natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Consequently, GIs for certain foodstuffs and certain non-food agricultural products (as set out in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Annex I to the Foodstuffs Regulation), wines and grapevine products (as set out in Annex VII, part 2, to the Wines Regulation), spirit drinks (as set out in Annex II to the Spirit Drinks Regulation) and aromatised wine products (as set out in Annex II to the Aromatised Wines Regulation) that may claim protection under national laws are not a proper basis for opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR. 
Zato geografske označbe za nekatera živila in neživilske kmetijske proizvode (kot je določeno v Prilogi I k Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in Prilogi I k Uredbi o živilih), vina in proizvode iz vinske trte (kot je določeno v delu 2 Priloge VII k Uredbi o vinih), žgane pijače (kot je določeno v Prilogi II k Uredbi o žganih pijačah) ter aromatizirane vinske proizvode (kot je določeno v Prilogi II k Uredbi o aromatiziranih vinskih proizvodih), za katere se lahko zahteva zaščita na podlagi nacionalnega prava, niso utemeljen razlog za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
For the latter products, the opponent must invoke the relevant EU legislation in the notice of opposition. 
Za navedene proizvode se mora vložnik ugovora v obvestilu o ugovoru sklicevati na ustrezno zakonodajo EU.
Article 8(6)(i) EUTMR requires proof of registration of the GI invoked. 
21: Na primer vino, peneče vino, likersko vino, vinski mošt, vendar ne vinski kis.][
Accordingly, the opponent must submit the relevant registration certificate or equivalent documents emanating from the competent national registration authority. 
22: Na primer žitno žganje, vinsko žganje, sadno žganje, brendi, likerji, rum, viski, gin.][
Such evidence may be provided by making reference to an online source recognised by the Office (Article 7(3) EUTMDR). 
V skladu s tem mora vložnik ugovora predložiti ustrezno potrdilo o registraciji ali enakovredne dokumente, ki jih izda pristojni nacionalni organ za registracijo.
Further, pursuant to Article 7(2)(e) EUTMDR, where the earlier GI is invoked pursuant to the law of a Member State, the opponent must provide a clear identification of the content of the national law relied upon by adducing publications of the relevant provisions or case-law. 
Dokazila morajo podpreti vse podatke o geografski označbi, tudi njeno ime, ki je zaščiteno kot geografska označba, zajeto blago, pridobitev pred datumom prednostne pravice izpodbijane znamke, dokaz o upravičenosti in dokaz, da zaščita na podlagi nacionalnega prava upravičencu geografske označbe podeljuje neposredno pravico do ukrepanja zoper nepooblaščeno uporabo.
It may provide such evidence by making a reference to a relevant online source recognised by the Office. 
Te dokaze lahko predloži s sklicevanjem na ustrezni spletni vir, ki ga priznava Urad.
The opponent must prove the conditions of the scope of protection and particulars proving that those conditions are fulfilled in the given case. 
Vložnik ugovora mora dokazati pogoje obsega varstva in podatke, ki dokazujejo, da so ti pogoji v zadevnem primeru izpolnjeni.
5.2.3 GIs protected under international agreements 
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov
Notwithstanding that Article 8(6) EUTMR does not explicitly mention GIs protected under international agreements, the reference to ‘Union legislation' and ‘national law' naturally includes international agreements as they form part of the legal order of the European Union or the Member State that is a party to the international agreement. 
Ne glede na to, da člen 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU geografskih označb, ki so zaščitene na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov, ne omenja izrecno, sklicevanje na zakonodajo Unije in nacionalno pravo seveda vključuje mednarodne sporazume, saj so del pravnega reda Evropske unije ali države članice, ki je pogodbenica mednarodnega sporazuma.
In order for an opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR to be successful on the basis of a right deriving from any international agreement, the provisions under the international agreement must be directly applicable and they must allow the beneficiary of the relevant GI to take direct legal action to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark (see paragraph 3.1 above concerning the requirement of a direct right of action). 
Da bi bil ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uspešen na podlagi pravice, ki izhaja iz katerega koli mednarodnega sporazuma, se morajo določbe na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma neposredno uporabljati, upravičencu zadevne geografske označbe pa morajo omogočati, da za prepoved uporabe poznejše znamke uporabi neposreden sodni postopek (glej odstavek 3.1 zgoraj o zahtevi za neposredno pravico do ukrepanja).
In the latter respect, international agreements are not always self-executing. 
Glede na zadnjenavedeno se mednarodni sporazumi ne izvajajo vedno neposredno.
This depends on the characteristics of the agreement itself and on how they have been interpreted in the relevant jurisdiction. 
To je odvisno od značilnosti sporazuma in od tega, kako se razlagajo v okviru ustrezne jurisdikcije.
For example, the Office considers that the provisions of the Lisbon Agreement (in particular Articles 3 and 8) are not self-executing. 
Urad na primer meni, da se določbe Lizbonskega aranžmaja (zlasti člena 3 in 8) ne izvajajo neposredno.
As expressly indicated by Article 8 of the Lisbon Agreement, it is the relevant national legislation that must determine which type of legal actions may be taken, their scope and whether these legal actions include allowing the proprietor of an appellation of origin to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark. 
Kot je izrecno navedeno v členu 8 Lizbonskega aranžmaja, mora o vrsti sodnih postopkov, ki se lahko uporabijo, njihovem obsegu in tem, ali ti sodni postopki vključujejo možnost, da imetnik označbe porekla prepove uporabo poznejše znamke, odločiti ustrezna nacionalna zakonodaja.
Therefore, in such cases, the requisite national legislation must be adduced as this is a necessary component in order for the opponent to prove that the GI in question can prevent use of the subsequent mark and that the opponent is entitled by the law governing the right to exercise this right. 
Zato je treba v takšnih primerih navesti ustrezno nacionalno zakonodajo, saj je to nujen element, s katerim vložnik ugovora dokaže, da lahko zadevni geografski označbi prepreči uporabo poznejše znamke in da je vložnik ugovora upravičen do uveljavljanja te pravice na podlagi zakona, ki ureja to pravico.
International agreements entered into by the EU 
Mednarodni sporazumi, ki jih je sklenila EU
GIs deriving from agreements between the EU and third countries can be invoked under Article 8(6) EUTMR, if the provisions of these agreements vest the GI in a particular beneficiary or a precise class of users that have a direct right of action. 
Na geografske označbe, ki izhajajo iz sporazumov med EU in tretjimi državami, se je mogoče sklicevati na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če določbe iz teh sporazumov geografsko označbo dodelijo določenemu upravičencu ali natančni kategoriji uporabnikov, ki imajo neposredno pravico do ukrepanja.
Some Member States (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Portugal and Slovakia) are party to the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration of 1958 (as revised at Stockholm on 14/07/1967, and as amended on 28/09/1979). 
[24: Nekatere države članice (Bolgarija, Češka, Francija, Madžarska, Italija, Portugalska in Slovaška) so pogodbenice Lizbonskega aranžmaja o zaščiti označb porekla in njihovi mednarodni registraciji iz leta 1958 (revidiranega v Stockholmu 14. julija 1967 in spremenjenega 28. septembra 1979).
The European Union is not a signatory to the Lisbon Agreement.] 
Evropska unija ni podpisnica Lizbonskega aranžmaja.]
For the reasons set out in paragraph 5.2.1.3 above, a GI protected under an international agreement concluded by Member States (either among Member States or with third countries) cannot be invoked as an earlier right under Article 8(6) EUTMR if it encroaches upon the exhaustive nature of EU law in the relevant areas (currently certain foodstuffs and other agricultural products, wines, spirit drinks and aromatised wine products). 
Zaradi razlogov, določenih v zgoraj navedenemu odstavku 5.2.1.3, se na geografsko označbo, zaščiteno na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, ki ga sklenejo države članice (med seboj ali s tretjimi državami), kot prejšnjo pravico na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni mogoče sklicevati, če na ustreznih področjih (v tem primeru nekatera živila in drugi kmetijski proizvodi, vina, žgane pijače ter aromatizirani vinski proizvodi) posega v izčrpna pravila zakonodaje EU.
In the Budějovický Budvar case (08/09/2009, C478/07, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521), the Court discussed the exhaustive nature of EU law as regards GIs originating from Member States. 
Sodišče je v zadevi Budějovický Budvar (08/09/2009, C478/07, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521) razpravljalo o izčrpnosti prava EU v zvezi z geografskimi označbami, ki izvirajo iz držav članic.
In the Office's interpretation, this also applies a fortiori to third-country GIs in the relevant product fields that enjoy protection in the territory of a Member State through an international agreement concluded between that Member State and a non-EU country . 
Na podlagi razlage Urada to še toliko bolj velja tudi za geografske označbe tretje države na ustreznih področjih proizvodov, ki so na ozemlju države članice zaščiteni na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, sklenjenega med navedeno državo članico in tretjo državo.
[25: To which the EU is not a contracting party.] 
[25: EU ni pogodbenica tega sporazuma.]
This equally applies to the Lisbon Agreement. 
Enako velja tudi za Lizbonski aranžma.
The Lisbon Agreement creates an international registration and protection system for ‘appellations of origin' (Article 2(1)). 
Lizbonski aranžma določa sistem za mednarodno registracijo in varstvo za označbe porekla (člen 2(1)).
The definition of ‘appellations of origin' for food and beverage products under this Agreement is largely equivalent to that of a ‘designation of origin' under the relevant EU regulations. 
Opredelitev izraza označbe porekla za živila in pijače na podlagi tega aranžmaja je precej enaka opredelitvi izraza označba porekla na podlagi zadevnih uredb EU.
Therefore, appellations of origin protected in a Member State by virtue of the Lisbon Agreement cannot be a basis for opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR. 
Zato označbe porekla, ki so v državi članici zaščitene v skladu z Lizbonskim aranžmajem, ne morejo biti podlaga za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The only exceptions in this regard are the following. 
Edine izjeme v zvezi s tem so naslednji primeri:
International agreements that cover GIs that do not relate to foodstuffs, wines, spirit drinks or aromatised wine products. 
mednarodni sporazumi, ki zajemajo geografske označbe, ki se ne nanašajo na živila, vina, žgane pijače ali aromatizirane vinske proizvode;
International agreements concluded with third countries by a Member State before its accession to the EU. 
mednarodni sporazumi, ki jih država članica sklene s tretjimi državami pred datumom svojega pristopa k EU.
However, Member States are required to take all appropriate steps to eliminate the incompatibilities between an agreement concluded before a Member State's accession and the Treaty (see Article 307, Treaty establishing the European Community, now Article 351, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as interpreted by the Court in its judgment of 18/11/2003, C216/01, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2003:618, § 168-172). 
Vendar morajo države članice izvesti vse potrebne ukrepe za odpravo neskladnosti med sporazumom, sklenjenim pred pristopom države članice, in Pogodbo (glej člen 307 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zdaj člen 351 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), kot ga Sodišče razlaga v svoji sodbi 18/11/2003, C216/01, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2003:618, § 168-172);
International agreements concluded with a third country by a Member State after its accession to the EU, but before the entry into force of the uniform EU system of protection in the given product area. 
mednarodni sporazumi, ki jih država članica sklene s tretjo državo po svojem pristopu k EU, vendar pred začetkom veljavnosti enotnega sistema varstva EU za določeno področje proizvoda.
As Member States are under an obligation to eliminate incompatibilities with EU law, the Office will apply the last two exceptions (which exclusively concern third country GIs in the fields of foodstuffs, wines, spirit drinks or aromatised wine products) only when the opponent expressly refers to the exception and supports it by a coherent line of argument and relevant evidence (in particular, concerning the date of entry into force of the cited international agreement in the EU Member State where protection is claimed and its continued validity). 
Ker morajo države članice odpraviti neskladnosti z zakonodajo EU, bo Urad zadnji dve izjemi (ki se nanašata izključno na geografske označbe tretjih držav na področju živil, vin, žganih pijač ali aromatiziranih vinskih proizvodov) uporabljal le, kadar se vložnik ugovora izrecno sklicuje na izjemo ter to podpre s povezanimi trditvami in ustreznimi dokazi (zlasti v zvezi z datumom začetka veljavnosti navedenega mednarodnega sporazuma v državi članici EU, kjer se zahteva varstvo, in z njegovo nadaljnjo veljavnostjo).
General allegations by the opponent (such as merely citing the relevant international agreement) will not be sufficient in themselves for the Office to consider that one of the latter two exceptions applies. 
Splošne trditve vložnika ugovora (kot je le navedba ustreznega mednarodnega sporazuma) same po sebi ne bodo zadostovale, da bi Urad priznal veljavnost ene od zadnjih dveh izjem.
Although Article 8(6)(i) EUTMR requires registration of the GI, it can be applied by way of analogy to third-country GIs protected under international agreements. 
Čeprav se na podlagi člena 8(6)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU zahteva registracija geografske označbe, se lahko po analogiji uporablja za geografske označbe tretjih držav, zaščitene na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov.
In the case of international agreements to which the EU is a party, the date of entry into force of the international agreement is deemed to be the date of priority of such a GI (and in the case of a third-country GI added subsequently to the list, the date of entry into force of the amendment), unless the international agreement stipulates an earlier date of priority. 
V primeru mednarodnih sporazumov, katerih pogodbenica je EU, se datum začetka veljavnosti mednarodnega sporazuma šteje za datum prednostne pravice take geografske označbe (in v primeru geografske označbe iz tretje države, ki se pozneje doda na seznam, datum začetka veljavnosti spremembe), če mednarodni sporazum ne določa zgodnejšega datuma prednostne pravice.
5.3 Scope of protection of GIs 
Obseg varstva geografskih označb
The scope of protection of GIs protected under EU law is governed by Articles 13(1), 103(2), 16 and 20(2) of the Foodstuffs, Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations, respectively. 
Obseg varstva geografskih označb, zaščitenih na podlagi prava EU, urejajo člen 13(1) Uredbe o živilih, člen 103(2) Uredbe o vinih, člen 16 Uredbe o žganih pijačah in člen 20(2) Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih.
The provisions preventing registration, Articles 14(1), 102(1), 23(1) and 19(1) of the Foodstuffs, Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations respectively, are not a basis for opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR (12/06/2007, T60/04 - T64/04, Bud, EU:T:2007:169, § 78); such an opposition cannot depend on whether the opponent fulfilled the conditions required to prohibit registration under the said provisions (18/09/2015, T387/13, COLOMBIANO HOUSE / CAFE DE COLOMBIA, EU:T:2015:647, § 40 et seq.). 
Določbe, ki preprečujejo registracijo, in sicer člen 14(1) Uredbe o živilih, člen 102(1) Uredbe o vinih, člen 23(1) Uredbe o žganih pijačah in člen 19(1) Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih, niso podlaga za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (12/06/2007, T60/04 - T64/04, Bud, EU:T:2007:169, § 78), tak ugovor ne more biti odvisen od tega, ali je vložnik ugovora izpolnil pogoje, ki so potrebni za preprečitev registracije na podlagi navedenih določb (18/09/2015, T387/13, COLOMBIANO HOUSE / CAFE DE COLOMBIA, EU:T:2015:647, § 40 et seq.).
Therefore, under Article 8(6) EUTMR, a GI can prevail if the conditions set out in the provisions preventing use are met. 
Zato lahko geografska označba na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU prevlada, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz določb, ki preprečujejo uporabo.
It must be emphasised that it is the specific conditions of the scope of protection as laid down in the applicable provisions that apply and not, for example, the ‘similarity of signs', ‘similarity of goods and services' or ‘likelihood of confusion'. 
Poudariti je treba, da se uporabljajo posebni pogoji obsega uporabe, kot so določeni v določbah, ki se uporabljajo, in ne na primer „podobnost znakov“, „podobnost blaga in storitev“ ali „verjetnost zmede“.
Detailed information on the scope of protection of GIs protected under the relevant EU regulations is included in the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 10, Trade Marks in Conflict with Designations of Origin and Geographical Indications (Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR) (e.g. definitions of direct and indirect use, imitation, evocation, comparable products). 
Podrobne informacije o obsegu varstva geografskih označb, zaščitenih na podlagi zadevnih uredb EU, so na voljo v Smernicah, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavje 10: Blagovne znamke, ki sovpadajo z označbami porekla in geografskimi označbami (člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU) (npr. opredelitve neposredne in posredne uporabe, posnemanja, navajanja, primerljivih proizvodov).
The provisions of the EU regulations preventing use contemplate situations where a GI can be invoked against goods or services that do not necessarily fall within the scope of objectionable goods and services under the ex officio examination of absolute grounds, subject to the conditions of the relevant provisions of the corresponding EU regulations. 
Določbe iz uredb EU, ki preprečujejo uporabo, obravnavajo okoliščine, v katerih je mogoče geografsko označbo uveljavljati zoper blago ali storitve, ki ne spadajo nujno med sporno blago in storitve v okviru preizkušanja absolutnih razlogov po uradni dolžnosti, pri čemer se upoštevajo pogoji zadevnih določb iz ustreznih uredb EU.
For instance, under Articles 13(1)(a), 103(2)(a)(ii), 16(a) and 20(2)(a)(ii) of the Foodstuffs, Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations respectively, a GI can be invoked against products and services that would not be objectionable ex officio under absolute grounds, subject to proof of reputation of the GI in the EU and proof that the use of the contested mark in relation to the contested goods and services would exploit the reputation of the GI. 
Na podlagi člena 13(1)(a) Uredbe o živilih, člena 103(2)(a)(ii) Uredbe o vinih, člena 16(a) Uredbe o žganih pijačah in člena 20(2)(a)(ii) Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih se lahko geografska označba uveljavlja zoper proizvode in storitve, ki ne bi bile sporne na podlagi absolutnih razlogov po uradni dolžnosti, pri čemer se upošteva dokaz o ugledu geografske označbe v EU in dokaz, da bi uporaba izpodbijane znamke v povezavi z izpodbijanim blagom in storitvami izkoriščala ugled geografske označbe.
The mere existence of protection as a GI and references to its reputation in the registration documents, even if such a reputation had been a factor in granting GI protection, is not sufficient; independent and conclusive evidence attesting to the reputation of the GI within the European Union is required for the purposes of applying the wider scope of protection. 
Le obstoj varstva kot geografske označbe in sklicevanje na njen ugled v dokumentih o registraciji, tudi če je bil ta ugled dejavnik pri podelitvi zaščite geografski označbi, ne zadostuje, za namene uporabe širšega obsega varstva so potrebni neodvisni in prepričljivi dokazi o ugledu geografske označbe v Evropski uniji.
As regards the standard of proof, the territorial and temporal scope of reputation, the standards for assessment of the reputation of an EUTM are applicable by way of analogy (with the obvious difference that any use must be in accordance with the function of a GI and not a trade mark). 
V zvezi z dokaznim standardom, ozemeljskim in časovnim obsegom ugleda se standardi za presojo ugleda blagovne znamke EU uporabljajo po analogiji (z očitno razliko, da mora biti kakršna koli uporaba v skladu s funkcijo geografske označbe, in ne blagovne znamke).
As regards the specific condition of ‘exploitation of reputation', the established standards for assessment of the link between the signs and taking unfair advantage of the reputation of a trade mark are applicable by way of analogy (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 5, Trade Marks with Reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR)). 
V zvezi s posebnimi pogoji izkoriščanja ugleda se vzpostavljeni standardi za presojo zveze med znaki in neupravičenega izkoriščanja ugleda blagovne znamke uporabljajo po analogiji (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 5: Blagovne znamke z ugledom (člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU)).
Nevertheless, either under EU or national legislation, the scope of protection of GIs cannot exceed what is required in order to safeguard the function of the GI; the function in question is to designate goods as being from a particular geographic origin and the special qualities connected therewith. 
Kljub temu obseg varstva geografskih označb na podlagi zakonodaje EU ali nacionalne zakonodaje ne sme presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za zagotovitev funkcije geografske označbe, tj. označiti določeno geografsko poreklo blaga in posebne značilnosti, ki so povezane s tem.
Unlike other signs, GIs are not used to indicate the commercial origin of goods and they afford no protection in this regard. 
Geografske označbe se v nasprotju z drugimi znaki ne uporabljajo za označevanje trgovskega porekla blaga in v zvezi s tem ne zagotavljajo varstva.
Therefore, where the specification of an EUTM application is limited to goods in conformity with the specification of the relevant protected GI, the function of the GI in question is safeguarded in relation to those products because the EUTM application only covers products from the particular geographic origin and the special qualities connected therewith. 
Če je torej specifikacija prijave blagovne znamke EU omejena na blago, ki je v skladu s specifikacijo ustrezne zaščitene geografske označbe, je za navedene proizvode funkcija zadevne geografske označbe zagotovljena, saj prijava blagovne znamke EU obsega le proizvode z določenim geografskim poreklom in posebnimi značilnostmi, ki so povezane s tem.
Consequently, opposition against an EUTM application that has been appropriately limited will not succeed. 
Zato ugovor zoper prijavo blagovne znamke EU, ki je bila ustrezno omejena, ne bo uspešen.
See in this regard Article 12(1) of the Foodstuffs Regulation or Article 103(1) of the Wines Regulation. 
V zvezi s tem glej člen 12(1) Uredbe o živilih in člen 103(1) Uredbe o vinih.
Earlier right Case No 
Prejšnja pravica Št. zadeve
Where the national law does not confer on a legal entity (whether public or private) a subjective right allowing it to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark, the ‘proprietary requirement' is not met. 
Če nacionalna zakonodaja pravni osebi (javni ali zasebni) ne podeljuje osebne pravice, ki ji omogoča prepoved uporabe poznejše znamke, „zahteva glede imetništva“ ni izpolnjena.