natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When there has been a partial transfer of a (contested) EUTM application, the Office must create a separate file for the new registration (application) with a new registration (application) number. 
Urad mora v primeru delnega prenosa (izpodbijane) prijave blagovne znamke EU odpreti ločen spis za novo registracijo (prijavo) z novo številko registracije (prijave).
In this case, when the transfer is recorded in the Register and a new EUTM application is created, the opposition examiner also has to create a new opposition file against the new EUTM application, since it is not possible to deal with one opposition against two separate EUTM applications. 
V takšnem primeru mora preizkuševalec ugovora, ko je prenos vpisan v register in je ustvarjena nova prijava blagovne znamke EU, tudi odpreti nov spis ugovora(-ov) zoper novo prijavo blagovne znamke EU, ker ni mogoče obravnavati enega ugovora zoper ločeni prijavi blagovne znamke EU.
However, this is only the case when some of the originally contested goods and services are maintained in the ‘old' EUTM application and some in the newly created EUTM application. 
Vendar to velja samo, kadar je del prvotno izpodbijanega blaga in storitev ohranjen v prejšnji prijavi blagovne znamke EU, del pa je vključen v novo ustvarjeno prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
For example: Opponent X opposes all the goods of EUTM application Y, applied for in Class 12 for apparatus for locomotion by land and air, and for clothing and footwear in Class 25. 
Na primer: vložnik ugovora X vloži ugovor zoper vse blago iz prijave blagovne znamke EU Y, ki se nanaša na naprave za gibanje po kopnem in zraku iz razreda 12 ter oblačila in obutev iz razreda 25.
EUTM application Y is partially transferred, and split into old EUTM application Y for apparatus for locomotion by land and clothing, and new EUTM application Y for apparatus for locomotion by air, and footwear. 
Prijava blagovne znamke EU Y je delno prenesena in razdeljena na prejšnjo prijavo blagovne znamke EU Y za naprave za gibanje po kopnem in oblačila ter novo prijavo blagovne znamke EU Y za naprave za gibanje po zraku in obutev.
Articles 20 and 27 EUTMR 
Člena 20 in 27 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Since there was only one opposition fee to be paid when the opponent filed its opposition, a second fee for the new opposition created after the split of the EUTM application is not required because, at the time of filing, the opposition was only directed against one EUTM application. 
Ker je moral vložnik ugovora ob vložitvi ugovora plačati samo eno pristojbino za ugovor, se za novi ugovor, ustvarjen po razdelitvi prijave blagovne znamke EU, ne zahteva plačilo še ene pristojbine za ugovor, saj je bil ugovor ob vložitvi usmerjen le zoper eno prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
Regarding the apportionment of costs, the opposition examiner will take into account the fact that only one opposition fee was paid. 
Preizkuševalec ugovora bo v zvezi s porazdelitvijo stroškov upošteval, da je bila plačana samo ena pristojbina za ugovor.
Moreover, depending on the circumstances of the case, it could be possible to join the proceedings (e.g. when the representative of the ‘old' and ‘new' applications is the same). 
Poleg tega bo morda mogoče glede na okoliščine zadeve združiti postopka (npr. kadar je zastopnik za prejšnjo in novo prijavo isti).
6.5.2 Parties are the same after transfer 
Stranki sta po prenosu isti
In the event that, as a result of a transfer, the opponent and applicant become the same person or entity, the opposition becomes devoid of any purpose and will accordingly be closed ex officio by the Office. 
Če vložnik ugovora in prijavitelj zaradi prenosa postaneta ista oseba ali subjekt, ugovor postane brezpredmeten in ga zato Urad konča po uradni dolžnosti.
6.5.3 Change of names 
Sprememba imena
As mentioned above, a change of name does not imply a change of ownership. 
Kot je bilo navedeno zgoraj, sprememba imena ne pomeni spremembe lastništva.
6.5.4 Change of representatives 
Zamenjava zastopnikov
Article 119 EUTMR 
Člen 119 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
When there is a change of representative during opposition proceedings, the other party will have to be informed by sending it a copy of the letter and of any authorisation submitted. 
Če se med postopkom ugovora zamenja zastopnik, je treba drugo stranko o tem obvestiti s kopijo dopisa in katerega koli predloženega pooblastila.
For detailed information please refer to the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 5, Professional Representation. 
Za podrobne informacije glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 5: Poklicno zastopanje.
6.5.5 Interruption of the proceedings due to death or legal incapacity of the applicant or its representative 
Prekinitev postopka zaradi smrti ali pravne in poslovne nesposobnosti prijavitelja ali njegovega zastopnika
Article 106 EUTMR 
Člen 106 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 72 EUTMDR 
Člen 72 Delegirane uredbe
Article 106 EUTMR deals with interruption of proceedings. 
Člen 106 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se nanaša na prekinitev postopka.
Paragraph 1 distinguishes three situations: 
V odstavku 1 se razlikuje med tremi primeri.
Opposition proceedings before the Office will be interrupted: 
Postopek ugovora pred Uradom se prekine:
1. when the EUTM applicant has died or is under legal guardianship; 
v primeru smrti ali pravne in poslovne nesposobnosti prijavitelja blagovne znamke EU,
2. when the EUTM applicant is subject to bankruptcy or any similar proceedings; 
kadar je prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU v stečaju ali podobnem postopku izvršbe,
3. when the representative of an applicant has died or is otherwise prevented from representing the applicant. 
v primeru smrti zastopnika prijavitelja ali če je zastopniku kako drugače onemogočeno zastopanje prijavitelja.
For further information see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 5, Professional Representation. 
Za več informacij glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 5: Poklicno zastopanje.
Article 106 EUTMR only refers to the applicant and its representative and does not mention anything about other parties, such as opponents. 
Člen 106 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se nanaša samo na prijavitelja in njegovega zastopnika, druge stranke, kot so vložniki ugovorov, pa v njem sploh niso navedene.
In the absence of relevant provisions, the Office will apply this provision only to cases where the applicant (or its representative) is not able to continue the proceedings. 
Ker ni ustreznih določb, bo Urad to določbo uporabljal samo za primere, v katerih prijavitelj (ali njegov zastopnik) ne more nadaljevati postopka.
Therefore, if, for example, the opponent is declared bankrupt, the proceedings will not be interrupted (even where the opponent is the applicant/proprietor of an earlier EUTM application/EUTM). 
Če je torej na primer razglašen stečaj vložnika ugovora, postopek ne bo prekinjen (tudi če je vložnik ugovora prijavitelj/imetnik prejšnje prijave blagovne znamke EU/blagovne znamke EU).
The uncertainty of the legal status of an opponent or its representative will not be to the detriment of the applicant. 
Negotovost pravnega statusa vložnika ugovora ali njegovega zastopnika ne bo škodovala prijavitelju.
In such a case, when the notification is returned to the Office as undeliverable, the normal rules for public notification apply. 
V takšnem primeru se, če je uradno obvestilo vrnjeno Uradu kot nevročljivo, uporabljajo običajna pravila za javno obveščanje.
6.5.5.1 Death or legal incapacity of the applicant 
Smrt ali pravna in poslovna nesposobnost prijavitelja
In the event of the death of the applicant or of the person authorised by national law to act on their behalf because of the legal incapacity of the applicant, the proceedings are only interrupted when this is requested by the representative of the applicant/authorised person or when the representative resigns. 
V primeru smrti prijavitelja ali osebe, ki je zaradi pravne in poslovne nesposobnosti prijavitelja na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje pooblaščena za delovanje v njegovem imenu, se postopek prekine samo, kadar to zahteva prijaviteljev zastopnik/pooblaščena oseba ali kadar zastopnik odstopi.
6.5.5.2 Applicant prevented from continuing the proceedings before the Office owing to legal reasons (e.g. bankruptcy) 
Prijavitelj iz pravnih razlogov (npr. stečaj) ne more nadaljevati postopka pred Uradom
Article 106(1)(b) EUTMR 
Člen 106(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 72(3) EUTMDR 
Člen 72(3) Delegirane uredbe
Article 106(1)(b) EUTMR applies from the point in time from which the party to the proceedings is no longer entitled to dispose of the procedure, i.e. to dispose of its assets, until the point in time a liquidator or trustee is appointed who will then continue to represent the party under the law. 
Člen 106(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se uporablja od trenutka, ko stranka v postopku nima več pravice nadaljevati postopka, tj. razpolagati s svojim premoženjem, do trenutka, ko je imenovan likvidator ali upravitelj, ki bo nato po pravu zastopal stranko.
When the applicant is represented by a professional representative who has not resigned, there is no need to interrupt the proceedings. 
Če prijavitelja zastopa poklicni zastopnik, ki ni odstopil, postopka ni treba prekiniti.
The Office considers the applicant's representative to be entitled to represent the applicant until the Office is informed otherwise by the representative itself, by the designated trustee or the court dealing with the legal action in question. 
Urad šteje, da ima prijaviteljev zastopnik pravico zastopati prijavitelja, dokler ga zastopnik sam, imenovani upravitelj ali sodišče, pristojno za zadevni sodni postopek, ne obvesti drugače.
If the representative informs the Office that it is resigning, how the Office proceeds will depend on whether the representative also indicates who will act as trustee or liquidator in the bankruptcy. 
Če zastopnik Urad obvesti, da odstopa, je nadaljnje ravnanje Urada odvisno od tega, ali zastopnik tudi navede, kdo je imenovan za stečajnega upravitelja ali likvidatorja.
If the representative does indicate a trustee or liquidator, the Office will continue to correspond with that trustee or liquidator. 
Če zastopnik to navede, bo Urad odslej komuniciral z navedenim upraviteljem ali likvidatorjem.
If there were time limits affecting the applicant that had not yet expired when it went bankrupt, the Office will re-start these time limits. 
Če so za prijavitelja veljali roki, ki se ob njegovem stečaju še niso iztekli, bo Urad določil vnovični začetek teh rokov.
Therefore, in this case, the proceedings are interrupted and immediately resumed. 
V takšnem primeru se zato postopek prekine in takoj začne znova.
For example, if the applicant still had ten days to file observations when it went bankrupt, the new letter of the Office to the trustee will give a fresh time limit of 2 months to file those observations. 
Na primer, če je imel prijavitelj ob stečaju na voljo še deset dni za predložitev pripomb, bo v novem dopisu Urada za upravitelja določen nov dvomesečni rok za njihovo predložitev.
If the representative does not give any information regarding a liquidator or trustee, the Office has no choice but to declare an interruption of the proceedings. 
Če zastopnik ne predloži informacij o likvidatorju ali upravitelju, Urad nima druge možnosti, kot da postopek prekine.
A communication to that effect will be sent to the bankrupt applicant directly and to the opponent. 
Obvestilo v zvezi s tem bo poslano neposredno prijavitelju v stečaju in vložniku ugovora.
Although it is not up to the Office to investigate who the liquidator is, the Office will keep on trying to communicate with the bankrupt applicant with the aim of resuming the proceedings. 
Čeprav ni dolžnost Urada, da razišče, kdo je likvidator, si bo še naprej prizadeval komunicirati s prijaviteljem v stečaju, da bi se postopek lahko nadaljeval.
This is because, although the bankrupt applicant is not allowed to undertake binding legal acts, generally it still receives correspondence, or, if not, the correspondence is delivered automatically to the trustee as long as there is one. 
To pa zato, ker prijavitelj v stečaju, čeprav ne sme izvajati pravno zavezujočih dejanj, na splošno še vedno prejema korespondenco ali pa je ta, če je ne prejema, samodejno dostavljena upravitelju, če ta obstaja.
The Office might also consider information on the identity of the trustee provided by the opponent. 
Urad lahko upošteva tudi informacije o identiteti upravitelja, ki jih zagotovi vložnik ugovora.
When the notification is returned to the Office as undeliverable, the normal rules for public notification apply. 
Če je uradno obvestilo Uradu vrnjeno kot nevročljivo, se uporabljajo običajna pravila za javno obveščanje.
Evidence submitted about the appointment of the liquidator or trustee need not be translated into the language of the proceedings. 
Predloženih dokazov o imenovanju likvidatorja ali upravitelja ni treba prevesti v jezik postopka.
Once the Office has been informed of who the liquidator or trustee is, the proceedings are resumed from a date to be fixed by the Office. 
Ko je Urad obveščen o tem, kdo je likvidator ali upravitelj, se postopek nadaljuje od datuma, ki ga določi Urad.
The other party must be informed. 
Druga stranka mora biti o tem obveščena.
Time limits that had not yet expired when the proceedings were interrupted start running again when the proceedings are resumed. 
Rok, ki se še ni iztekel, ko je bil postopek prekinjen, začne znova teči, ko se postopek nadaljuje.
For example, if the proceedings were interrupted ten days before the applicant had to submit observations, a new time limit will start - of 2 months rather than the ten days left at the time of the interruption. 
Na primer, če je bil postopek prekinjen deset dni pred iztekom roka, ki ga je imel prijavitelj na voljo za predložitev pripomb, bo začel veljati nov rok, in sicer je ta dolg dva meseca, ne pa deset dni, ki so ostali ob prekinitvi postopka.
For clarification, the letter sent by the Office informing the parties about the resumption will fix a new time limit. 
Urad zaradi jasnosti v dopisu, s katerim stranki obvesti o nadaljevanju postopka, določi nov rok.
6.5.5.3 Death or legal incapacity of the applicant's representative 
Smrt ali pravna in poslovna nesposobnost zastopnika prijavitelja
Article 106(1)(c) and Article 119(2) EUTMR 
Člen 106(1)(c) in člen 119(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
In the case referred to in Article 106(1)(c) EUTMR, the proceedings must be interrupted and will be resumed when the Office is informed of the appointment of a new representative of the EUTM applicant. 
V primeru iz člena 106(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je treba postopek prekiniti, nadaljuje pa se, ko je Urad obveščen o imenovanju novega zastopnika prijavitelja blagovne znamke EU.
When resuming the proceedings, the Office will proceed as follows. 
Pri nadaljevanju postopka Urad ravna, kakor sledi:
1. If the appointment of a representative is compulsory under Article 119(2) EUTMR because the applicant has neither its domicile nor its seat in the EEA, the Office will contact the applicant and inform it that the EUTM application will be refused if it does not appoint a representative within a specified time limit. 
če je imenovanje zastopnika obvezno na podlagi člena 119(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ker prijavitelj nima stalnega prebivališča ali sedeža v EGP, bo Urad stopil v stik s prijaviteljem in ga obvestil, da bo prijava blagovne znamke EU zavrnjena, če v dveh mesecih ne imenuje zastopnika;
2. If appointment of a representative is not compulsory under Article 119(2) EUTMR, the Office will resume the proceedings and will send all the communications to the applicant directly. 
če imenovanje zastopnika ni obvezno na podlagi člena 119(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, bo Urad postopek nadaljeval in vso korespondenco poslal neposredno prijavitelju.
In both cases, resuming the proceedings will mean that any time limits pending for the applicant when the proceedings were interrupted start running again once the proceedings are resumed. 
V obeh primerih nadaljevanje postopka pomeni, da vsi roki, ki jih je prijavitelj še imel na voljo, ko je bil postopek prekinjen, začnejo znova teči, ko se postopek nadaljuje.
Earlier trade marks 1 2 3 4 5 
Prejšnje blagovne znamke 1 2 3 4 5
Owner A/B A A A A 
Imetnik A/B A A A A
Owners A/B A/C A A A 
Imetniki A/B A/C A A A
Owners A A B B B 
Imetniki A A B B B
Owners A/B A A B B 
Imetniki A/B A A B B
Owners A/B/C B/C A A A 
Imetniki A/B/C B/C A A A
Earlier trade marks 1 2 3 
Prejšnje blagovne znamke 1 2 3
Owner A A A 
Imetnik A A A
Licensees B C None 
Pridobitelji licence B C Ga ni
Owner A A B 
Imetnik A A B
Licensees B C A 
Pridobitelji licence B C A
Countries Term of protection Starting point 
Države Veljavnost varstva Začetek
Benelux (Belgium, Luxembourg, The Netherlands) 10 years Filing date 
Beneluks (Belgija, Luksemburg, Nizozemska) 10 let Datum vložitve
Bulgaria 10 years Filing date 
Bolgarija 10 let Datum vložitve
Czech Republic 10 years Filing date 
Češka 10 let Datum vložitve
Denmark 10 years Registration date 
Danska 10 let Datum registracije
Germany 10 years Filing date 
Nemčija 10 let Datum vložitve
Estonia 10 years Registration date 
Estonija 10 let Datum registracije
Ireland 10 years for TM registered since 01/07/1996 (7/14 years renewal before that) Registration date = filing date 
Irska 10 let za blagovne znamke, registrirane od 1. julija 1996 (pred tem 7 let in podaljšanje za 14 let) Datum registracije = datum vložitve
Greece 10 years Filing date 
Grčija 10 let Datum vložitve
Spain 10 years for trade marks applied for since 12/05/89 (20 years for trade marks applied for before that, counting from the date of registration, and with a renewal from the filing date) Filing date 
Španija 10 let za blagovne znamke, prijavljene po 12. maju 1989 (20 let za blagovne znamke, prijavljene pred tem, pri čemer se šteje datum registracije, in s podaljšanjem od datuma vložitve) Datum vložitve
France 10 years Filing date 
Francija 10 let Datum vložitve
Croatia 10 years Filing date 
Hrvaška 10 let Datum vložitve
Italy 10 years Filing date 
Italija 10 let Datum vložitve
Cyprus 7 years first term/14 years renewal Filing date = registration date 
Ciper 7 let za prvo obdobje varstva/podaljšanje za 14 let Datum vložitve = datum registracije
Latvia 10 years Filing date 
Latvija 10 let Datum vložitve
Lithuania 10 years Filing date 
Litva 10 let Datum vložitve
Hungary 10 years Filing date 
Madžarska 10 let Datum vložitve
Malta 10 years Registration date = filing date 
Malta 10 let Datum registracije = datum vložitve
Austria 10 years Registration date 
Avstrija 10 let Datum registracije
Poland 10 years Filing date 
Poljska 10 let Datum vložitve
Portugal 10 years Registration date 
Portugalska 10 let Datum registracije
Romania 10 years Filing date 
Romunija 10 let Datum vložitve
Slovenia 10 years Filing date 
Slovenija 10 let Datum vložitve
Slovakia 10 years Filing date 
Slovaška 10 let Datum vložitve
Finland 10 years Registration date 
Finska 10 let Datum registracije
Sweden 10 years Registration date 
Švedska 10 let Datum registracije
International registration 10 years (even if 20 years for Madrid Agreement registrations, fees must be paid in two instalments of 10 years, equivalent to a renewal fee) International registration date 
Mednarodna registracija 10 let (čeprav za registracije po Madridskem sporazumu velja 20 let, je treba pristojbine plačati v dveh obrokih za 10 let, enakovrednih pristojbini za podaljšanje) Datum mednarodne registracije
Opposition Extent 
Ugovor Obseg
No 1 Class 3 
Št. 1 Razred 3
No 2 Class 25 
Št. 2 Razred 25
No 3 Classes 18 and 25 
Št. 3 Razreda 18 in 25
No 4 Classes 14 and 25 
Št. 4 Razreda 14 in 25
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part C, Opposition Page 74 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del C, Ugovor stran 88
Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion - General Principles 
Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede - Splošna načela
DOUBLE IDENTITY AND LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION 
DVOJNA ENAKOST IN VERJETNOST ZMEDE
2 Article 8(1) EUTMR 4 
2 Člen 8(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU 4
2.1 Article 8(1)(a) EUTMR - double identity 4 
2.1 Člen 8(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU - dvojna enakost 4
2.2 Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR - likelihood of confusion 4 
2.2 Člen 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU - verjetnost zmede 4
2.3 Interrelation of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) EUTMR 5 
2.3 Medsebojna povezanost člena 8(1)(a) in (b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU 5
3 The Notion of Likelihood of Confusion 5 
3 Pojem verjetnost zmede 5
3.2 Likelihood of confusion and likelihood of association 6 
3.2 Verjetnost zmede in verjetnost povezovanja 6
3.3 Likelihood of confusion and distinctiveness of the earlier mark 7 
3.3 Verjetnost zmede in razlikovalni učinek prejšnje blagovne znamke 7
3.4 Likelihood of confusion: questions of fact and questions of law 8 
3.4 Verjetnost zmede: vprašanja dejstev in vprašanja prava 8
3.4.1 Fact and law - similarity of goods/services and of signs 8 
3.4.1 Dejstva in pravo - podobnost blaga ali storitev in znakov 8
3.4.2 Fact and law - evidence 9 
3.4.2 Dejstva in pravo - dokazi 9
4 Evaluation of the Relevant Factors for Establishing a Likelihood of Confusion 10 
4 Presoja zadevnih dejavnikov za ugotovitev verjetnosti zmede 9
4.1 The relevant point in time 10 
4.1 Zadevni trenutek 9
4.2 List of factors for assessing the likelihood of confusion 10 
4.2 Seznam dejavnikov za presojo verjetnosti zmede 10
Annex 11 
Priloga 11
This chapter provides an introduction to and overview of the concepts of (i) double identity and (ii) likelihood of confusion that are applied in situations of conflict between trade marks in opposition proceedings under Article 8(1) EUTMR. 
To poglavje je uvod in pregled v pojma (i) dvojna enakost in (ii) verjetnost zmede ter pregled teh pojmov, ki se uporabljata v primeru nasprotujočih si blagovnih znamk v postopku ugovora na podlagi člena 8(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The paragraphs below set out the nature of these concepts and their legal underpinning as determined by the relevant laws and as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court') . 
V nadaljevanju sta opredeljena narava teh pojmov in njuna pravna podlaga, kot je opredeljena z ustreznimi zakoni in kot jo razlaga Sodišče Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sodišče EU).
[2: The Court was, in fact, often interpreting Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (the ‘Directive'), which for the purposes of interpretation are broadly comparable to Articles 8 and 9 EUTMR.] 
[2: Sodišče EU je dejansko pogosto razlagalo člena 4 in 5 Direktive 2008/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2008 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami (v nadaljnjem besedilu: direktiva), ki sta za namene razlage na splošno primerljiva s členoma 8 oziroma 9 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.]
The legal concepts of double identity and likelihood of confusion are used to protect trade marks and, at the same time, to define their scope of protection. 
Pravna pojma dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede se uporabljata za varstvo blagovnih znamk in hkrati za opredelitev obsega njihovega varstva.
It is thus important to bear in mind what aspects or functions of trade marks merit protection. 
Zato je treba upoštevati, kateri vidiki ali funkcije blagovnih znamk so upravičeni do varstva.
Trade marks have various functions. 
Blagovne znamke imajo različne funkcije.
The most fundamental one is to act as ‘indicators of origin' of the commercial provenance of goods/services. 
Najosnovnejša je, da so označbe izvora tržnega izvora blaga ali storitev.
This is their ‘essential function'. 
To je njihova bistvena funkcija.
In the Canon judgment the Court held that: 
Sodišče EU je v sodbi v zadevi Canon menilo, da: