natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In such a situation the party making general reference to other documents or evidence may be invited to be sufficiently specific within a given time limit. 
V takšnem primeru je mogoče stranko, ki se na splošno sklicuje na druge dokumente ali dokaze, pozvati, naj v določenem roku natančno določi to sklicevanje.
The party should be informed that the time limit granted by the Office is only meant for the clear and precise indication of the documents or evidence referred to and that under no circumstances will an extension of the original time limit be granted. 
Stranko je treba obvestiti, da je rok, ki ga je odobril Urad, namenjen samo jasni in natančni navedbi dokumentov ali dokazov, na katere se sklicuje, ter da ne bo v nobenem primeru odobreno podaljšanje prvotnega roka.
Moreover, the party should also be informed that if it does not specify what documents are being referred to within the time limit set, those other documents will not be considered. 
Poleg tega jo je treba obvestiti tudi, da se ti drugi dokumenti ne bodo upoštevali, če v predpisanem roku ne bo podrobno navedla dokumentov, na katere se sklicuje.
In this case, the reference to documents or evidence submitted in other opposition proceedings has no effect. 
V takšnem primeru sklicevanje na dokumente ali dokaze, predložene v drugih postopkih ugovora, nima učinka.
4.5 Further exchanges 
Dodatne izmenjave
Article 8(2), (4), (6) and (9) EUTMDR 
Člen 8(2), (4), (6) in (9) Delegirane uredbe
The Office invites the applicant to file observations within the time limit set by it in accordance with Article 8(2) EUTMDR. 
Urad v skladu s členom 8(2) Delegirane uredbe prijavitelja pozove, naj predloži pripombe v roku, ki mu ga določi.
The applicant can request proof of use of the earlier right with or without submitting observations at the same time on the grounds on which the opposition is based. 
Prijavitelj lahko zahteva dokaz o uporabi prejšnje pravice, pri čemer lahko hkrati predloži pripombe glede razlogov, na katerih temelji ugovor, ali pa jih ne predloži.
In that case, the observations may be submitted together with the observations in reply to the proof of use. 
V takšnem primeru se lahko pripombe predložijo skupaj s pripombami v odgovor na dokaz o uporabi.
In appropriate cases, the Office may invite the parties to limit their observations to particular issues. 
Urad lahko v ustreznih primerih stranki pozove, naj pripombe omejita na določena vprašanja.
In that case, the party is allowed to raise the other issues at a later stage of the proceedings. 
V takšnem primeru se stranki dovoli, da druga vprašanja odpre v poznejši fazi postopka.
Once the applicant has submitted its observations in reply, the opponent is granted a final time limit to submit its counter-reply if the Office considers it necessary. 
Ko prijavitelj predloži pripombe v odgovor, se vložniku ugovora odobri zadnji rok za predložitev replike, če je to po mnenju Urada potrebno.
After this, the adversarial part of the proceedings is usually closed and the opposition is ready for decision. 
Po tem se kontradiktorni del postopka običajno konča in za ugovor je mogoče sprejeti odločbo.
The Office may, however, grant the possibility of another exchange of observations. 
Vendar lahko Urad odobri dodatno izmenjavo pripomb.
This can occur when the case deals with complex issues or when the opponent raises a new point and it is admitted to the proceedings. 
To se lahko zgodi, kadar se zadeva nanaša na zapletena vprašanja ali kadar vložnik ugovora odpre novo vprašanje in se to v postopku dopusti.
In this case, the applicant must be given a possibility of replying. 
V takšnem primeru je treba prijavitelju omogočiti odgovor.
The Office may exercise its discretion in deciding whether another round of observations should be granted to the opponent (e.g. if the applicant raises new issues such as the coexistence of the marks, the invalidity of the earlier right or an agreement between parties). 
Urad lahko uveljavlja diskrecijsko pravico pri odločanju, ali bi bilo treba vložniku ugovora odobriti dodaten krog izmenjave pripomb (npr. če prijavitelj odpre nova vprašanja, kot so soobstoj znamk, ničnost prejšnje pravice ali dogovor med strankama).
Pursuant to Article 10(7) EUTMDR, the Office may, under certain circumstances, take into account additional evidence for proof of use that is submitted after expiry of the corresponding time limit. 
Urad lahko v skladu s členom 10(7) Delegirane uredbe v nekaterih okoliščinah upošteva dodatnih dokazov za dokaz o uporabi, predložena po izteku ustreznega roka.
Additional evidence will be examined on a case-by-case basis. 
Dodatni dokazi bodo proučeni za vsak primer posebej.
For further details, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use. 
Za dodatne podrobnosti glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi.
4.6 Observations by third parties 
Člen 45 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Communication No 2/09 of the President of the Office of 09/11/2009 
2/09 z dne 9. novembra 2009
Third parties can make observations explaining why the EUTM application should not be registered under Article 5 EUTMR or on the basis of one of the absolute grounds of Article 7 EUTMR. 
Tretje osebe lahko predložijo pripombe, v katerih pojasnijo, zakaj prijava blagovne znamke EU ne bi smela biti registrirana v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ali na podlagi enega od absolutnih razlogov iz člena 7 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
For further details, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, and the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 1, Proceedings. 
Za dodatne podrobnosti glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev in razdelek 1: Postopek.
Anybody can submit third-party observations; even the opponent is entitled to do so. 
Pripombe tretje osebe lahko predloži kdor koli, tudi vložnik ugovora.
However, it should do so in a manner that leaves no doubt that they are third-party observations. 
Vendar mora to storiti tako, da ni nobenega dvoma, da so to pripombe tretje osebe.
According to the abovementioned Communication of the President of the Office, the observations must be submitted separately. 
V skladu z zgoraj navedenim sporočilom predsednika Urada je treba pripombe predložiti posebej.
However, in practice (30/11/2004, R 735/20002, Serie A (fig.) / LEGA PALLAVOLO SERIE A), the ‘separate submission' requirement is deemed to be satisfied when the observations are clearly separable from the grounds and arguments supporting the opposition, even if they are included in the same document. 
Vendar se v praksi (30/11/2004, R 735/20002, Serie A (fig.) / LEGA PALLAVOLO SERIE A) šteje, da je zahteva po ločeni predložitvi izpolnjena, kadar je mogoče pripombe jasno ločiti od razlogov in navedb v podporo ugovoru, tudi če so vključene v isti dokument.
As long as the opponent expressly mentions that it wishes to make observations under Article 45 EUTMR, these will be dealt with, even if they are not submitted separately. 
Če vložnik ugovora izrecno navede, da želi predložiti pripombe na podlagi člena 45 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, bodo te obravnavane, tudi če niso predložene ločeno.
However, if in its submission the opponent argues that the EUTM application should have been refused under Articles 5 and 7 EUTMR, without any reference to the contents of Article 45 EUTMR, this submission will not be regarded as third-party observations under Article 45 EUTMR. 
Vendar če vložnik ugovora v svojih pripombah trdi, da bi morala biti prijava blagovne znamke EU zavrnjena na podlagi členov 5 in 7 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ne da bi se skliceval na vsebino člena 45 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, se ta trditev ne bo štela za pripombe tretjih oseb na podlagi člena 45 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
When an opponent makes third-party observations, the Office will consider if the observations raise serious doubts as to the registrability of the EUTM application, or if they will only be sent to the applicant for information purposes. 
Kadar vložnik ugovora predloži pripombe tretje osebe, Urad prouči, ali pripombe vzbujajo resne dvome glede možnosti registracije prijave blagovne znamke EU oziroma ali jih je treba le poslati prijavitelju v vednost.
If the observations raise serious doubts, the Office must suspend the opposition proceedings until a decision on the observations is taken. 
Če pripombe vzbujajo resne dvome, mora Urad začasno ustaviti postopek ugovora, dokler se ne sprejme odločitev o pripombah.
In cases where the observations do not raise serious doubts (i.e. when the observations have only been sent to the applicant for information purposes) or do not affect the contested goods or services, the opposition proceedings will not be suspended. 
Kadar pripombe ne vzbujajo resnih dvomov (tj. pripombe so bile poslane prijavitelju le v vednost) ali ne vplivajo na izpodbijano blago ali storitve, se postopek ugovora ne bo začasno ustavil.
If the opposition proceedings need to be suspended, the suspension will take effect from the date when the Office issues the objection under Article 7 EUTMR, and proceedings will remain suspended until a final decision has been taken. 
Če je treba postopek ugovora začasno ustaviti, bo začasna ustavitev veljala od datuma, ko Urad izrazi pomisleke na podlagi člena 7 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, postopek pa bo ostal začasno ustavljen, dokler ne bo sprejeta končna odločitev.
Where the third-party observations are received within the 3-month opposition period, the Office will first deal with the admissibility of the opposition and, once the decision on admissibility has been notified, the opposition proceedings will be suspended. 
Kadar so pripombe tretjih oseb prejete v trimesečnem roku za ugovor, bo Urad najprej obravnaval dopustnost ugovora in po uradnem obvestilu o dopustnosti začasno ustavil postopek ugovora.
For oppositions closed due to third-party observations, the opposition fee will not be refunded, as no provision for such refund is made in the regulations (see Article 6(5) EUTMDR). 
Pri ugovorih, ki se končajo zaradi pripomb tretjih oseb, se pristojbina za ugovor ne povrne, ker tako povračilo ni predvideno v uredbah (glej člen 6(5) Delegirane uredbe).
5 Termination of Proceedings 
Končanje postopka
5.1 Friendly settlement 
Sporazumna rešitev
Article 47(4) EUTMR 
Člen 47(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 6(2) EUTMDR 
Člen 6(2) Delegirane uredbe
The parties are free to decide on the measure that brings the opposition proceedings to a conclusion. 
Stranki lahko sami odločata o ukrepih, s katerimi se konča postopek ugovora.
While they can decide to withdraw the opposition, they can also simply ask the Office to close the case without giving specific reasons. 
Odločita se lahko za umik ugovora ali preprosto prosita Urad, naj zadevo konča, ne da bi navedli posebne razloge.
It suffices to communicate the written signed agreement of the parties, which does not have to include a statement of grounds. 
Zadostuje že, da Uradu pošljeta podpisani pisni dogovor strank, pri čemer obrazložitev ni potrebna.
The Office then takes the steps needed to close the proceedings on the basis of this agreement. 
Urad nato sprejme ukrepe, potrebne za končanje postopka na podlagi tega dogovora.
Regarding the refund of fees and decision on costs in case of friendly settlement, please see the relevant paragraph below. 
V zvezi s povračilom pristojbin in odločitvijo o stroških v primeru sporazumne rešitve glej ustrezni odstavek v nadaljevanju.
The Office may, if it thinks fit, invite the parties to make a friendly settlement. 
Urad lahko, če se mu to zdi ustrezno, stranki pozove k sporazumni rešitvi.
The Office, as well as the parties, may therefore initiate a settlement procedure. 
Urad in stranki lahko torej začnejo postopek za sporazumno rešitev.
To this end the Office may issue proposals for friendly settlement. 
Urad lahko zato pripravi predloge za sporazumno rešitev.
As, in principle, the Office cannot (and does not wish to) replace the parties, it will only take action in very rare cases where a settlement between the parties appears desirable and if there are good reasons for considering that the proceedings can be ended by a settlement. 
Ker Urad načeloma ne more (in ne želi) nadomestiti strank, bo ukrepal le v zelo redkih primerih, kadar se sporazumna rešitev med strankama zdi primerna in če obstajajo dobri razlogi za mnenje, da se lahko postopek konča s sporazumno rešitvijo.
If expressly requested by the parties, the Office can also offer assistance with their negotiations, for instance by acting as an intermediary or by providing them with any material resources that they need. 
Urad lahko na izrecno zahtevo strank tudi ponudi pomoč pri njunih pogajanjih, tako da na primer deluje kot posrednik ali da jima zagotovi materialne vire, ki jih potrebujeta.
Any costs incurred are borne by the parties. 
Vse nastale stroške nosita stranki.
Friendly settlement may be preceded by a request for suspension. 
Pred sporazumno rešitvijo se lahko vloži prošnja za začasno ustavitev.
5.2 Restrictions and withdrawals 
Omejitve in umiki
Articles 66(1) and 71(3), Article 146(6)(a), Article 146(9) and Article 109 EUTMR 
Člen 66(1), člen 71(3), člen 146(6)(a), člen 146(9) in člen 109 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 6(2), (3) and (4) EUTMDR 
Člen 6(2), (3) in (4) Delegirane uredbe
5.2.1 Restrictions and withdrawals of EUTM applications 
Omejitve in umiki prijav blagovne znamke EU
Article 49 EUTMR 
Člen 49 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 6(5) EUTMDR 
Člen 6(5) Delegirane uredbe
It is possible for the applicant to restrict the goods and services of its application or to withdraw the entire application at any stage of the opposition proceedings. 
Prijavitelj lahko na kateri koli stopnji postopka ugovora omeji blago in storitve v svoji prijavi ali umakne celotno prijavo.
Such requests must be filed by way of separate documents as stated above under paragraph 4.4.1. 
Take zahteve je treba vložiti v ločenih dokumentih, kot je navedeno v odstavku 4.4.1 zgoraj.
Withdrawals and restrictions must be explicit and unconditional. 
Umiki in omejitve morajo biti izrecni in brezpogojni.
Silence on the part of the EUTM applicant during the proceedings will never be considered as a tacit withdrawal. 
Molk prijavitelja blagovne znamke EU med postopkom se ne bo nikoli štel za tihi umik.
A conditional or ambiguous withdrawal or restriction will not be accepted and will be forwarded to the other party merely for information purposes, with the parties being informed that it will not be taken into account. 
Pogojni ali dvoumni umiki ali omejitve ne bodo sprejeti in bodo drugi stranki poslani samo v vednost, pri čemer bosta stranki obveščeni, da se ne bodo upoštevali.
The Office does not accept conditional restrictions. 
Urad ne sprejema pogojnih omejitev.
For example, the applicant argues in its observations in reply to the opposition that the signs are dissimilar but adds that, if the examiner finds them similar, it will restrict the list of goods and services of the EUTM application. 
Na primer, prijavitelj v svojih pripombah v odgovor na ugovor trdi, da sta znaka različna, vendar dodaja, da bo, če bi preizkuševalec ugotovil njuno podobnost, omejil seznam blaga in storitev v prijavi blagovne znamke EU.
In this case, the restriction is not acceptable, and the applicant must be informed that the restriction must be express and unconditional. 
V tem primeru omejitev ni sprejemljiva, prijavitelja pa je treba obvestiti, da mora biti omejitev izrecna in brezpogojna.
If the restriction is not acceptable, the applicant must be notified. 
Če omejitev ni sprejemljiva, mora biti prijavitelj o tem obveščen.
If a restriction is partly acceptable and partly unacceptable, the Office will proceed with the restriction for the acceptable part and will inform the applicant of the part that cannot be accepted, giving the applicant 2 months to react. 
Če je omejitev delno sprejemljiva in delno nesprejemljiva, bo Urad priznal omejitev za sprejemljivi del in prijavitelja obvestil o delu, ki ga ni mogoče sprejeti, pri čemer bo prijavitelju dal na voljo dva meseca za odgovor.
The opponent must be sent a copy of the restriction and the Office's reply thereto. 
Vložniku ugovora je treba poslati kopijo omejitve in odgovora Urada nanjo.
If, within the 2 months, the applicant submits a new proposal for the unacceptable part of the restriction, which the Office can now accept, the restriction will be processed, taking into account the date of filing of the first request for the restriction. 
Če prijavitelj v dveh mesecih predloži nov predlog za nesprejemljivi del omejitve, ki jo Urad lahko zdaj sprejme, bo omejitev obravnavana, pri tem pa se upošteva datum vložitve prve zahteve za omejitev.
On the other hand, if the applicant does not react, the restriction is only processed insofar as it is acceptable (11/12/2014, C31/14 P, Premeno, EU:C:2014:2436, § 43-51). 
Po drugi strani, če prijavitelj ne odgovori, se omejitev obravnava le v delu, v katerem je sprejemljiva (11/12/2014, C31/14 P, Premeno, EU:C:2014:2436, § 43-51).
If the opponent withdraws its opposition after an unacceptable restriction has been filed, the withdrawal will not be taken into account if it clearly refers to the unacceptable restriction. 
Če vložnik ugovora umakne svoj ugovor po tem, ko je bila vložena nesprejemljiva omejitev, se umik ne bo upošteval, če se jasno nanaša na nesprejemljivo omejitev.
Once the restriction has become acceptable, the opponent will be informed of the new list of goods and services and will be granted a new time limit to confirm the withdrawal of the opposition. 
Ko omejitev postane sprejemljiva, bo vložnik ugovora obveščen o novem seznamu blaga in storitev ter mu bo odobren nov rok za potrditev umika ugovora.
If the restriction is acceptable, confirmation is sent to the applicant. 
Če je omejitev sprejemljiva, se prijavitelju pošlje potrditev.
Depending on the moment in the proceedings, the restriction or withdrawal has different consequences, described below. 
Posledice omejitve ali umika so različne in odvisne od tega, v kateri fazi je postopek, opisane pa so v nadaljevanju.
For further information on restrictions of an EUTM application, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 3, Classification and Part B, Examination, Section 1, Proceedings, paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2. 
Za dodatne informacije o omejitvah prijave blagovne znamke EU glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 3: Razvrstitev in razdelek 1: Postopek, odstavka 5.1 in 5.2.
5.2.1.1 Withdrawal or restriction before the admissibility check is made 
Umik ali omejitev pred preizkusom dopustnosti
Restriction covers the whole extent of opposition/withdrawal 
Omejitev se nanaša na celoten obseg ugovora/umika
When the EUTM application is withdrawn or restricted to non-contested goods and services before notification regarding admissibility of the opposition has been issued, the opposition proceedings are closed and the opposition fee is refunded. 
Kadar je prijava blagovne znamke EU umaknjena ali omejena na neizpodbijano blago in storitve pred izdajo uradnega obvestila o dopustnosti ugovora, se postopek ugovora konča in pristojbina za ugovor se povrne.
In other words, dealing with the withdrawal or restriction in such cases takes priority over the admissibility of the opposition. 
Z drugimi besedami, obravnavanje umika ali omejitve ima v takšnih primerih prednost pred preizkusom dopustnosti ugovora.
No decision on costs will be taken. 
Odločitev o stroških ne bo sprejeta.
Restriction does not (seem to) cover the whole extent of the opposition 
Omejitev se (kot kaže) ne nanaša na celoten obseg ugovora
In the case of a restriction that may still include contested goods and services, an admissibility check is done. 
Pri omejitvi, ki bi še lahko vključevala izpodbijano blago in storitve, se opravi preizkus dopustnosti.
The restriction is notified to the opponent together with the notification regarding admissibility or the communication informing the opponent of an absolute or relative admissibility deficiency. 
Omejitev se vložniku ugovora sporoči skupaj z uradnim obvestilom o dopustnosti ali sporočilom, s katerim je obveščen o absolutni ali relativni pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z dopustnostjo.
If the opposition is withdrawn, the opposition fee is refunded. 
Če je ugovor umaknjen, se pristojbina za ugovor povrne.
This is the case even if irremediable deficiencies exist. 
To velja tudi, če obstajajo nepopravljive pomanjkljivosti.
The opponent's letter does not have to make an express reference to the restriction, as long as it is later in time than the applicant's restriction. 
Vložniku ugovora se v dopisu ni treba izrecno sklicevati na omejitev, če je poznejši od prijaviteljeve omejitve.
5.2.1.2 Restrictions and withdrawals of EUTM applications before the end of the cooling-off period 
Omejitve in umiki prijav blagovne znamke EU pred iztekom obdobja za pobotanje
Restriction covers the whole extent of the opposition/withdrawal 
Omejitev se nanaša na celoten obseg ugovora/umika
When it is absolutely clear that the restriction covers the whole extent of the opposition, or when the EUTM application is withdrawn, this is notified to the parties and the proceedings are closed. 
Če je popolnoma jasno, da se omejitev nanaša na celoten obseg ugovora, ali kadar je prijava blagovne znamke EU umaknjena, se to sporoči strankama in postopek se konča.
The opponent is refunded the opposition fee. 
Vložniku ugovora se vrne pristojbina za ugovor.
Restriction does not (seem to) cover the whole extent of opposition/withdrawal 
Omejitev se (kot kaže) ne nanaša na celoten obseg ugovora/umika
If it is not completely clear that the restriction covers the whole extent of the opposition or the restriction does not cover the whole extent of the opposition, the opponent is invited to inform the Office whether it wishes to maintain or withdraw its opposition. 
Če ni popolnoma jasno, da se omejitev nanaša na celoten obseg ugovora, ali če se omejitev ne nanaša na celoten obseg ugovora, je vložnik ugovora pozvan, naj Urad obvesti, ali želi vztrajati pri svojem ugovoru ali ga umakniti.
The parties are notified of its reply. 
Njegov odgovor se uradno sporoči strankama.
If the opposition is withdrawn, the opposition fee is refunded to the opponent. 
Če je ugovor umaknjen, se vložniku ugovora vrne pristojbina za ugovor.
The relevant time for assessing whether the opposition proceedings have been closed during the cooling-off period is the date when a request for restriction was filed before the Office. 
Upoštevni čas za presojo, ali je bil postopek ugovora končan med obdobjem za pobotanje, je datum, ko je bila zahteva za omejitev vložena pri Uradu.
If the withdrawal of the opposition is received by the Office before the official notification of the restriction is forwarded to the opponent, the withdrawal is considered to be a consequence of the restriction and the opposition fee is also refunded. 
Če Urad umik ugovora prejme, preden je vložniku ugovora poslano uradno obvestilo o omejitvi, se šteje, da je umik posledica omejitve, povrne pa se tudi pristojbina za ugovor.
The initial reaction of the opponent to the notification does not matter, as long as the withdrawal is declared later. 
Prvotni odziv vložnika ugovora na obvestilo ni pomemben, če je umik razglašen pozneje.
The opponent does not reply within the time limit given to it but subsequently withdraws its opposition within the cooling-off period (which has been extended). 
Vložnik ugovora ne odgovori v roku, ki ga ima na voljo, vendar nato umakne svoj ugovor v obdobju za pobotanje (ki je bilo podaljšano).
The opponent responds by maintaining its opposition, but nevertheless withdraws the opposition still within the extended cooling-off period. 
Vložnik ugovora odgovori, da vztraja pri svojem ugovoru, vendar ga pozneje umakne v podaljšanem obdobju za pobotanje.
5.2.1.3 Restrictions and withdrawals of EUTM applications after the end of the cooling-off period 
Omejitve in umiki prijav blagovne znamke EU po izteku obdobja za pobotanje