natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, while words, letters and numbers should in principle be assessed phonetically, some symbols and abbreviations give rise to uncertainty. 
Nazadnje je pri besedah, črkah in številkah treba načeloma opraviti zvočno presojo, pri nekaterih simbolih in kraticah pa obstaja negotovost.
For example, the logogram ‘&' (ampersand) will generally be read and pronounced and therefore should be included in the phonetic comparison. 
Na primer, logogram „&“ (et) se navadno prebere in izgovori, zato mora biti vključen v zvočno primerjavo.
However, the pronunciation of a given symbol may differ where different languages are concerned. 
Vendar se lahko neki simbol v različnih jezikih različno izgovarja.
The same goes for the typographic character @, which in principle will be pronounced. 
Enako velja za tipografski znak „@“, ki se bo načeloma izgovoril.
Obviously, the pronunciation of a given symbol may differ where different languages are concerned. 
Seveda se lahko neki simbol v različnih jezikih različno izgovarja.
In the above case, it cannot be denied that a part of the relevant public - in particular English speakers - would read the ‘at' symbol and thus pronounce the trade mark as ‘at home'. 
V zgornjem primeru ni mogoče zanikati, da bo del upoštevne javnosti - zlasti angleško govoreči - simbol „at“ prebral in torej blagovno znamko izgovoril kot „at home“.
This possibility must, therefore, be taken into consideration, together with other possibilities such as ‘a home' or simply ‘home'. 
To možnost je torej treba upoštevati, skupaj z drugimi možnostmi, kot je a home ali preprosto „home“.
However, compare this with the following examples. 
Vendar primerjajmo to z naslednjima primeroma.
The plus (+) and minus/hyphen (-) symbols may or may not be pronounced by the relevant public, depending on the circumstances. 
Znake za plus (+) in vezaj (-) oziroma minus (-) upoštevna javnost lahko izgovori ali pa ne, odvisno od okoliščin.
In the following examples, the symbol ‘+' in the contested EUTM application would be pronounced as ‘plus'. 
V naslednjih primerih bi se znak „+“ v izpodbijani prijavi blagovne znamke EU izgovoril kot plus.
Currency symbols (€, $, ₤, etc.) may also be pronounced when the relevant mark is pronounced. 
Tudi simboli za valute (€, $, ₤ itd.) se lahko izgovorijo, kadar se zadevna znamka izgovori.
As an example (fictional), in the United Kingdom the sign ‘₤ 20' would be pronounced as ‘20 pounds'. 
Kot (izmišljen) primer, v Združenem kraljestvu bi se znak „₤20“ izgovoril kot „20 pounds“.
Therefore, the signs ‘₤ 20', ‘20 pounds' and ‘twenty pounds' are phonetically identical. 
Zato so znaki „₤20“, „20 pounds“ in „twenty pounds“ zvočno enaki.
However, sometimes the way in which symbols - or letters - are used makes it unrealistic to assume that they will be read and pronounced in a particular way, for example, when in a figurative mark a symbol is repeated in order to create a pattern or is highly distorted or when the letters/numbers are otherwise not clearly legible/identifiable. 
Vendar je včasih zaradi načina, kako so simboli ali črke uporabljeni, nerealno domnevati, da se bodo prebrali in izgovorili na neki način, kadar se na primer simbol v figurativni znamki ponovi zaradi oblikovanja vzorca, ali je močno popačen, ali pa so črke ali številke slabo berljive ali prepoznavne.
This is illustrated by the following examples. 
To je ponazorjeno z naslednjimi primeri.
In summary, whether or not a given symbol/letter is pronounceable depends on the type of character in question, how it is depicted, and how it is combined with other elements of the sign. 
Skratka, izgovarjava simbola/črke je odvisna od vrste zadevnega znaka ter od tega, kako je prikazan in kako je povezan z drugimi elementi znaka.
3.4.2.2 Identical/similar sounds in different order 
Enaki/podobni glasovi v različnem vrstnem redu
Where the opposing trade marks are formed of syllables or words that are identical or highly similar but in a different order, so that if just one of the syllables or words were rearranged the signs would be identical or highly similar phonetically, the conclusion should be that the signs are phonetically similar. 
Kadar sta nasprotujoči si blagovni znamki sestavljeni iz zlogov ali besed, ki so enaki ali zelo podobni, vendar postavljeni v različnem vrstnem redu, tako da bi bila znaka, če bi bil samo eden od zlogov ali ena od besed postavljena na drugo mesto, zvočno enaka ali zelo podobna, je treba ugotoviti, da sta si znaka zvočno podobna.
3.4.2.3 Signs consisting of or including foreign or invented words 
Znaki, ki so sestavljeni iz tujih ali izmišljenih besed ali ki vključujejo takšne besede
When a sign contains foreign words, it should be assumed in principle that the relevant public is unfamiliar with how foreign native speakers pronounce their own language. 
Kadar znak vsebuje tuje besede, je treba načeloma domnevati, da upoštevna javnost ne ve, kako jih tuji domači govorci izgovarjajo v svojem jeziku.
Accordingly, the public will tend to pronounce a foreign word in accordance with the phonetic rules of their own language. 
Javnost bo torej običajno tujo besedo izgovarjala v skladu s fonetičnimi pravili svojega jezika.
However, this will not be the case when the relevant public is familiar with a word, for example in the following scenarios. 
Vendar to ne drži, kadar upoštevna javnost besedo pozna, kot to velja za naslednje primere.
When it is an established fact that a foreign language is known by the relevant public. 
Kadar je splošno znano, da upoštevna javnost pozna tuji jezik.
For example, the Court has already confirmed that there is at least a basic understanding of the English language by the general public in the Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands and Finland (26/11/2008, T435/07, New Look, EU:T:2008:534, § 23). 
Na primer, Sodišče je že potrdilo, da ima širša javnost v skandinavskih državah, na Nizozemskem in Finskem vsaj osnovno znanje angleškega jezika (26/11/2008, T435/07, New Look, EU:T:2008:534, § 23).
When certain terminology is clearly known by the relevant public for certain classes of goods and/or services. 
Kadar upoštevna javnost očitno pozna nekatere strokovne izraze za nekatere razrede blaga in/ali storitev.
For example, IT professionals and scientists are generally considered to be more familiar with the use of technical and basic English vocabulary than the average consumer, irrespective of territory (27/11/2007, T434/05, Activy Media Gateway, EU:T:2007:359, § 38, 48 for the IT field (11/12/2008, C57/08 P, EU:C:2008:718, dismissed); 09/03/2012, T207/11, Isense, EU:T:2012:121, § 21-22 for German professionals in the medical field). 
Za strokovnjake s področja informacijske tehnologije in znanstvenike se na primer na splošno šteje, da so bolj seznanjeni s tehničnim in osnovnim angleškim besediščem kot povprečni potrošnik, ne glede na ozemlje (27/11/2007, T434/05, Activy Media Gateway, EU:T:2007:359, § 38, 48 za področje informacijske tehnologije; (11/12/2008, C57/08 P, EU:C:2008:718, zavrnjena); 09/03/2012, T207/11, Isense, EU:T:2012:121, § 21-22, za nemške strokovnjake na področju medicine).
When very basic words will be understood in all Member States, such as the English words ‘baby', ‘love', ‘one', ‘surf', the Italian word ‘pizza', which has also entered the English language, etc. 
Kadar bo javnost v vseh državah članicah razumela zelo osnovne besede, kot so angleške besede „baby“, „love“, „one“, „surf“, italijansko besedo pizza, ki je tudi postala del angleškega jezika, itd.
Finally, when any one of the parties provides compelling evidence that a word is known by a significant portion of the relevant public. 
Nazadnje, kadar ena od strank predloži prepričljiv dokaz, da besedo pozna velik del upoštevne javnosti.
Where a significant part of the relevant public pronounces the foreign word correctly, but another significant part applies the rules of their mother tongue, any assessment of phonetic similarity should mention both pronunciations and provide reasoning. 
Če velik del upoštevne javnosti tujo besedo izgovarja pravilno, drug velik del pa uporablja pravila svojega maternega jezika, je treba pri kakršni koli presoji zvočne podobnosti navesti obe izgovarjavi in zagotoviti obrazložitev.
As regards invented or fanciful words (words that do not correspond to any existing word in the EU), the relevant consumer might pronounce them not only as they would sound according to the rules of pronunciation of their mother tongue but also as they are written. 
Kar zadeva izmišljene ali domišljijske besede (besede, ki ne ustrezajo nobeni obstoječi besedi v EU), bi jih upoštevni potrošnik lahko izgovarjal ne samo tako, kot bi zvenele glede na pravila izgovarjave njegovega maternega jezika, ampak tudi tako, kot so napisane.
3.4.2.4 Single letter signs 
Znaki, sestavljeni iz ene same črke
Marks consisting of a single letter can be compared phonetically. 
Znamke, ki so sestavljene iz ene same črke, je mogoče primerjati zvočno.
The following marks are phonetically identical insofar as they both reproduce the letter ‘A'. 
Naslednji znamki sta zvočno enaki, saj je v obeh prikazana črka „A“.
3.4.3 Conceptual comparison: practical criteria 
Pojmovna primerjava: praktična merila
Two signs are identical or similar conceptually when they are perceived as having the same or analogous semantic content (11/11/1997, C251/95, Sabèl, EU:C:1997:528, § 24). 
Znaka sta pojmovno enaka ali podobna, kadar se zaznavata kot znaka z enako ali podobno semantično vsebino (11/11/1997, C251/95, Sabèl, EU:C:1997:528, § 24).
The ‘semantic content' of a mark is what it means, what it evokes or, when it is an image or shape, what it represents. 
„Semantična vsebina“ znamke je to, kar pomeni, na kar spominja ali kar ponazarja (če je to slika ali oblika).
In this text the expressions ‘semantic content' and ‘concept' will be used indiscriminately. 
V tem besedilu se bosta izraza „semantična vsebina“ in „pojem“ uporabljala brez razlikovanja.
If a mark consists of various elements (e.g. a word and a figurative element) the concept of each of the elements must be defined. 
Če je znamka sestavljena iz različnih elementov (npr. besednega in figurativnega elementa), je treba opredeliti pojmovno vsebino vsakega od elementov.
However, if the mark is a meaningful expression (made up of two or more words), what matters is the meaning of the expression as a whole and not of each of the words in isolation. 
Vendar če je znamka smiseln izraz (iz dveh ali več besed), je pomemben pomen izraza kot celote, in ne pomen vsake posamezne besede.
Not every concept has to be defined: only those concepts likely to be known by the relevant public, as defined by the relevant territory, matter. 
Vsakega pojma ni treba opredeliti: pomembni so sami tisti pojmi, ki jih bo upoštevna javnost, kot je opredeljena z upoštevnim ozemljem, verjetno poznala.
For example, if the relevant territory is Spain, the fact that the word has a meaning in Polish is normally irrelevant. 
Na primer, če je upoštevno ozemlje Španija, dejstvo, da ima beseda pomen v poljščini, običajno ni pomembno.
As a rule, the conceptual comparison is not influenced by the relevant goods and services. 
Upoštevno blago in storitve praviloma ne vplivajo na pojmovno primerjavo.
However, if a term has many meanings, one of which is of particular significance to the relevant goods and services, the conceptual comparison may focus on this meaning. 
Vendar če ima izraz več pomenov, od katerih je eden posebej pomemben za upoštevno blago in storitve, je lahko pojmovna primerjava osredotočena na ta pomen.
In any event, what matters is how the term is perceived by the relevant public. 
Vsekakor je pomembno to, kako izraz zaznava upoštevna javnost.
A link between the goods and services and what the sign means, evokes or represents must not be forced or artificially constructed. 
Povezava med blagom in storitvami ter tem, kaj znak pomeni, na kaj spominja ali kaj ponazarja, ne sme biti izsiljena ali umetno ustvarjena.
For example, if the relevant goods relate to lighting and the sign is or contains the element ‘LED', ‘light-emitting diode' is one of the various possible meanings of ‘LED'. 
Na primer, če so upoštevno blago aparati za razsvetljavo in je znak „LED“ ali vsebuje element „LED“, je svetleča dioda eden od različnih možnih pomenov „LED“.
Therefore, the conceptual comparison may focus on this meaning. 
Pojmovna primerjava je torej lahko osredotočena na ta pomen.
3.4.3.1 The semantic content of words 
Semantična vsebina besed
When the mark consists of or contains a word, the first step for an examiner is to look up the explanation of that word in dictionaries and/or encyclopaedias in the language(s) of the relevant territory. 
Če je znamka sestavljena iz besede ali jo vsebuje, mora preizkuševalec najprej poiskati razlago te besede v slovarjih in/ali enciklopedijah v jeziku(-ih) upoštevnega ozemlja.
If the word is in the dictionary/encyclopaedia, the described meaning will be its semantic content. 
Če je beseda v slovarju/enciklopediji, bo opisan pomen njena semantična vsebina.
As a starting point, it should be noted that the relevant public in the various EU Member States mainly speak the languages predominant in their respective territories (23/10/2002, T6/01, Matratzen + Matratzenmarkt Concord (fig.), EU:T:2002:261, § 27). 
Na začetku je treba navesti, da upoštevna javnost v različnih državah članicah EU govori večinoma jezike, ki prevladujejo na upoštevnih ozemljih teh držav (23/10/2002, T6/01, Matratzen + Matratzenmarkt Concord (fig.), EU:T:2002:261, § 27).
These languages are normally the official languages of the relevant territory. 
Ti jeziki so običajno uradni jeziki upoštevnega ozemlja.
However, the Court has made equally clear that this rule only concerns the primary linguistic understanding of the public in those territories. 
Ob tem je Sodišče pojasnilo še, da se to pravilo nanaša samo na osnovno jezikovno razumevanje javnosti na navedenih ozemljih.
This is not an inflexible rule. 
To ni strogo pravilo.
The relevant public should not automatically be considered as having as its mother tongue the language that is predominant in the Member State concerned, or to have no particular knowledge of other languages (03/06/2009, C394/08 P, Zipcar, EU:C:2009:334, § 51). 
Za upoštevno javnost se ne sme samodejno šteti, da je njen materni jezik tisti jezik, ki prevladuje v zadevni državi članici, ali da nima posebnega znanja drugih jezikov (03/06/2009, C394/08 P, Zipcar, EU:C:2009:334, § 51).
For instance, in the following scenarios, languages other than the predominant one are to be taken into account. 
Tako je treba v naslednjih primerih upoštevati druge jezike, ki niso prevladujoči jezik.
When the word in another language is very close to the equivalent word in the official language of the relevant territory. 
Kadar je beseda v drugem jeziku zelo podobna enakovredni besedi v uradnem jeziku upoštevnega ozemlja.
For example, the English word ‘bicycle' will be understood in Spain because it is very close to the Spanish equivalent word, ‘bicicleta'. 
Na primer, angleško besedo „bicycle“ bodo v Španiji razumeli, saj je zelo podobna enakovredni španski besedi „bicicleta“.
When the word in a foreign language is commonly used in the relevant territory. 
Kadar se beseda v tujem jeziku pogosto uporablja na upoštevnem ozemlju.
For example, the Spanish word ‘bravo' is commonly used as a term denoting praise, in the sense of ‘well done' in Germany. 
Na primer, španska beseda „bravo“ se v Nemčiji pogosto uporablja kot izraz za pohvalo v smislu „dobro opravljeno“.
When it is known that the relevant public is familiar with a foreign language. 
Kadar je splošno znano, da upoštevna javnost pozna tuji jezik.
For example, the Court has already confirmed that the general public in the Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands and Finland, has at least a basic understanding of the English language (26/11/2008, T435/07, New Look, EU:T:2008:534, § 23). 
Sodišče je na primer že potrdilo, da širša javnost v skandinavskih državah, na Nizozemskem in Finskem premore vsaj osnovno razumevanje angleškega jezika (26/11/2008, T435/07, New Look, EU:T:2008:534, § 23).
When it is known that the relevant public is familiar with a certain language for certain classes of goods and/or services. 
Kadar je znano, da upoštevna javnost pozna izraze za nekatere razrede blaga in/ali storitev v nekem jeziku.
For example, English IT terms are normally understood by the relevant public for IT goods and services, irrespective of territory. 
Na primer, upoštevna javnost običajno razume angleške računalniške izraze za blago in storitve s področja informacijske tehnologije, ne glede na ozemlje.
Very basic words, which will be understood in all Member States because they have become internationally used, such as ‘baby', ‘love', ‘one', ‘surf', the Italian word ‘pizza', which has also entered the English language, etc. 
Javnost bo v vseh državah članicah razumela zelo osnovne besede, kot so „baby“, „love“, „one“, „surf“, italijansko besedo „pizza“, ki je tudi postala del angleškega jezika, itd., ker se uporabljajo mednarodno.
Finally, when any one of the parties submits evidence that a word is known by a relevant portion of the relevant public. 
Nazadnje, kadar katera koli od strank predloži prepričljiv dokaz, da besedo pozna velik del upoštevne javnosti.
The following are examples of concepts behind words. 
V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri pojmov v zvezi z besedami.
As shown in some of the examples above, it is not always necessary to give a complete dictionary definition of what a word means. 
Kot je razvidno iz nekaterih zgornjih primerov, ni treba vedno nujno navesti popolne slovarske opredelitve pomena besede.
It is sufficient to use a synonym, such as Peer = Lord or Storm = Bad weather. 
Zadostuje uporaba sopomenke, tako kot to velja za Peer = Lord ali Storm = slabo vreme.
Additionally, when part of the public will perceive the concept while another part either will not or will perceive a different meaning, a distinction should be made accordingly. 
Kadar bo del javnosti zaznal pojem, medtem ko ga drugi del bodisi ne bo zaznal bodisi bo zaznal drugačen pomen, je treba poleg tega opraviti še ustrezno razlikovanje.
When the mark conveys a meaningful expression, the meaning of the expression as a whole, as long as it is understood as such by the relevant public, and not that of the individual words, is the one that is relevant for the conceptual comparison (however, note the exception below concerning expressions in foreign languages). 
Kadar znamka predstavlja smiseln izraz, je za pojmovno primerjavo pomemben pomen izraza kot celote, če ga upoštevna javnost razume kot takega, in ne pomen posameznih besed (vendar bodite pozorni na izjemo v nadaljevanju v zvezi z izrazi v tujih jezikih).
Fictional example: ‘KING'S DOMAIN' v ‘KING SIZE'. 
Izmišljen primer: „KING'S DOMAIN“ proti „KING SIZE“.
Incorrect assessment: ‘KING' means ‘a male sovereign', ‘DOMAIN' means ‘a territory over which rule or control is exercised' and ‘SIZE' means ‘the physical dimensions, proportions, magnitude, or extent of an object'. 
Napačna presoja: „KING“ pomeni „moški vladar“, „DOMAIN“ pomeni „ozemlje pod vladavino ali nadzorom“ in „SIZE“ pomeni „prostorske dimenzije, mere, razsežnost ali obseg predmeta“.
The marks are conceptually similar insofar as they share the notion of ‘king'. 
Znamki sta si pojmovno podobni, ker jima je skupen pojem „king“.
Correct assessment: ‘KING'S DOMAIN' means ‘a territory under the control of a king'; ‘KING SIZE' means ‘larger or longer than the usual or standard size'. 
Pravilna presoja: „KING'S DOMAIN“ pomeni ozemlje pod nadzorom kralja, „KING SIZE“ pomeni večje ali daljše od običajne ali standardne velikosti.
The marks are conceptually dissimilar even though they share the word ‘KING'. 
Znamki se pojmovno razlikujeta, čeprav jima je skupna beseda „KING“.
This is illustrated by the following examples where the marks were found to be conceptually dissimilar. 
To je ponazorjeno z naslednjimi primeri, v katerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da se znamki pojmovno razlikujeta.
The abovementioned rule on meaningful expression has the following exception: when signs are in a foreign language, a significant part of the relevant public may have only a limited command of the relevant foreign language and, therefore, might not be able to distinguish the difference in meaning between two expressions. 
Pri zgornjem pravilu o smiselnem izrazu obstaja naslednja izjema: kadar sta znaka v tujem jeziku, ima lahko velik del upoštevne javnosti le omejeno znanje zadevnega tujega jezika in zato morda ne bo mogel ugotoviti razlike v pomenu med izrazoma.
In these instances it may be that the meaning of an expression as such is not perceived; only the meanings of the individual elements. 
V takšnih primerih se lahko zgodi, da javnost ne bo zaznala pomena izraza kot takega; zaznala bo samo pomene posameznih elementov.
Similar considerations apply to expressions that include a combination of technical words understood by only part of the relevant public (e.g. Latin words, words belonging to highly specialised language) and commonly used words. 
Podobni razmisleki veljajo za izraze, ki vključujejo kombinacijo tehničnih besed, ki jih razume le del upoštevne javnosti (npr. latinske besede, besede iz zelo strokovnega jezika), in pogosto uporabljenih besed.
In these cases, it may be that only the meaning of the commonly used words is perceived, and not the meaning of the expression as such. 
V takšnih primerih se lahko zgodi, da bo javnost zaznala samo pomen pogosto uporabljenih besed, ne pa tudi pomena izraza kot takega.
3.4.3.2 The semantic content of parts of words 
Semantična vsebina delov besed
In this regard, the Court has held that, although the average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyse its various details, the fact remains that, when perceiving a word sign, they will break it down into elements which, for them, suggest a specific meaning or which resemble words known to them (13/02/2007, T256/04, Respicur, EU:T:2007:46, § 57). 
Sodišče je v zvezi s tem razsodilo, da čeprav povprečni potrošnik običajno dojame znamko kot celoto in ne preverja njenih posameznih podrobnosti, ostaja dejstvo, da bo, ko bo videl besedni znak, tega vseeno razstavil na elemente, ki ga spominjajo na določen pomen ali so podobni besedam, ki jih pozna (13/02/2007, T256/04, Respicur, EU:T:2007:46, § 57).
Consequently, while the rule is that marks are perceived as a whole, the exception to the rule is that, under certain circumstances, consumers could break them down into smaller parts. 
Torej, čeprav se pravilo glasi, da se znamke zaznavajo kot celota, je izjema tega pravila, da bi jih lahko potrošniki v nekaterih okoliščinah razstavili na manjše dele.
Since this is an exception, it has to be applied restrictively. 
Ker je to izjema, jo je treba uporabljati omejeno.
It will be applied in the following cases. 
Uporabljala se bo v naslednjih primerih:
Examples of signs visually broken down 
Primeri vizualno razčlenjenih znakov
Examples of cases that are not broken down visually but where all the parts suggest a concrete meaning known to the relevant public. 
Primeri znakov, ki vizualno niso razčlenjeni, vendar pri katerih vsi deli namigujejo na konkreten pomen, ki je upoštevni javnosti znan:
Finally, cases where only one part has a clear meaning are usually ones where there is a common prefix or suffix, as in the examples below. 
Nazadnje, primeri znakov, pri katerih ima samo en del jasen pomen, so običajno tisti, v katerih je uporabljena splošno razširjena predpona ali pripona, kot v spodnjih primerih.
As explained above, all three exceptions have to be construed narrowly; therefore, where it is not obvious that a part or parts suggest(s) a concrete meaning known to the relevant public, examiners should refrain from looking for these meanings ex officio. 
Kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, je treba vse tri izjeme razlagati ozko, zato se morajo preizkuševalci, kadar ni očitno, da del ali več delov namiguje na konkreten pomen, ki je upoštevni javnosti znan, vzdržati iskanja takšnih pomenov po uradni dolžnosti.
In the examples below, no concept was found in the signs. 
V spodnjih primerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da znaki nimajo pojmovne vsebine.