natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Equally, it is because of their nature that most items made of leather are classified in Class 18, whereas clothing made of leather falls under Class 25 since it serves a very specific purpose, namely that of being worn by people and as protection from the elements. 
Podobno je večina izdelkov iz usnja zaradi svoje narave uvrščena v razred 18, oblačila iz usnja pa spadajo v razred 25, ker se uporabljajo za zelo specifični namen, in sicer da jih nosijo ljudje in da zagotavljajo zaščito pred neugodnimi vremenskimi razmerami.
1.2.3 Conclusions to be drawn from the structure of the Nice Classification 
Končne ugotovitve glede strukture Nicejske klasifikacije
The structure of the class headings is not uniform and does not follow the same logic. 
Struktura naslovov razredov ni enotna in ne temelji na isti logiki.
Some classes consist of only one general indication that by definition already covers nearly all the goods/services included in this class (Class 15 musical instruments; Class 38 telecommunications). 
Nekatere razrede sestavlja samo ena splošna označba, ki že po definiciji vključuje skoraj vse blago ali storitve iz tega razreda (razred 15 glasbeni instrumenti, razred 38 telekomunikacije).
Others include many general indications - some very broad and others very specific. 
Drugi razredi vključujejo veliko splošnih označb; nekatere so zelo široke, druge pa zelo specifične.
For example, the heading of Class 9 includes more than 30 terms, ranging from scientific apparatus and instruments to fire-extinguishing apparatus. 
Na primer, naslov razreda 9 vključuje več kot 30 izrazov, vse od znanstvenih aparatov in instrumentov do gasilnih aparatov.
Exceptionally, there are class headings containing general indications that include another general indication and are thus identical. 
Izjeme so naslovi razredov s splošnimi označbami, ki zajemajo drugo splošno označbo in so tako enaki.
Example: materials for dressing in Class 5 include plasters in Class 5. 
Primer: materiali za obveze v razredu 5 vključujejo obliže iz razreda 5.
Other specific indications in a class heading are only mentioned to clarify that they do not belong to another class. 
Druge specifične označbe v naslovu razreda so navedene le za pojasnitev, da ne spadajo v drug razred.
Example: adhesives used in industry are included in chemicals used in industry in Class 1. 
Primer: lepila za uporabo v industriji so vključena v kemikalije, ki se uporabljajo v industriji v razredu 1.
Its mention is mainly thought to distinguish them from adhesives classified in Class 16, which are for stationery or household purposes. 
Navedena so zlasti zato, da jih je mogoče razlikovati od lepil, uvrščenih v razred 16, za pisarniške ali gospodinjske namene.
To conclude, the Nice Classification gives indications that can be used in the assessment of identity or similarity of goods/services. 
Končna ugotovitev je tako naslednja: Nicejska klasifikacija vsebuje označbe, ki jih je mogoče uporabiti pri presoji enakosti ali podobnosti blaga ali storitev.
However, its structure and content is not consistent. 
Vendar njena struktura in vsebina nista dosledni.
Therefore, each heading or specific term has to be analysed according to the specific class under which it is classified. 
Zato je treba vsak naslov ali posamezen izraz analizirati v skladu z določenim razredom, v katerega je uvrščen.
As stated before, the Nice Classification mainly serves to categorise goods/services for administrative purposes and is not decisive for their comparison. 
Kot je bilo že navedeno, se Nicejska klasifikacija uporablja zlasti za razvrščanje blaga ali storitev v upravne namene in ni odločilna za njihovo primerjavo.
1.2.4 Changes in the classification of goods/services 
Spremembe v razvrstitvi blaga ali storitev
Normally, each revision of the Nice Classification brings changes in the classification of goods/services (in particular transfers of goods/services between various classes) or in the wording of headings. 
Z vsako revizijo Nicejske klasifikacije se običajno spremeni razvrstitev blaga ali storitev (zlasti v obliki prenosa blaga ali storitev med različnimi razredi) ali besedilo naslovov.
In such cases the list of goods/services of both the earlier and the contested mark must be interpreted according to the edition of the Nice Classification in force at the time of filing. 
V takšnih primerih je treba seznam blaga in/ali storitev prejšnje in izpodbijane znamke razlagati v skladu z izdajo Nicejske klasifikacije, ki se uporablja ob vložitvi prijave.
Legal services were transferred from Class 42 to Class 45 with the 8th edition of the Nice Classification. 
Pravne storitve so bile v osmi izdaji Nicejske klasifikacije prenesene iz razreda 42 v razred 45.
The nature of these services has not changed. 
Narava teh storitev se ni spremenila.
Vending machines were transferred from Class 9 to Class 7 in the 10th edition of the Nice Classification, since a vending machine is basically a powered machine and as such was considered more appropriately classified in Class 7 with other machinery. 
V deseti izdaji Nicejske klasifikacije so bili prodajni avtomati iz razreda 9 preneseni v razred 7, saj je prodajni avtomat v bistvu stroj na pogon in se je v zvezi z njim kot takim štelo, da ga je ustrezneje razvrstiti v razred 7 z drugimi stroji.
However, since the nature of these goods has not changed, vending machines classified in different classes due to the different filing dates of the respective applications are regarded as identical. 
Ker pa se narava tega blaga ni spremenila, se šteje, da so prodajni avtomati, ki so zaradi različnih datumov vložitve zadevnih prijav razvrščeni v različne razrede, enaki.
1.3 The Similarity Tool (EUIPN) for the comparison of goods/services 
Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti (EUIPN) za primerjavo blaga ali storitev
The Similarity Tool for the comparison of goods and services is a search tool to help and support examiners in assessing the similarity of goods and services. 
Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti za primerjavo blaga in storitev je iskalno orodje, ki preizkuševalcem zagotavlja pomoč in podporo pri presoji podobnosti blaga in storitev.
The Similarity Tool serves to harmonise practice on the assessment of similarity of goods and services and to guarantee the coherence of opposition decisions. 
Uporablja se za usklajevanje prakse pri presoji podobnosti blaga in storitev ter za zagotavljanje skladnosti odločb o ugovoru.
The Similarity Tool must be followed by examiners. 
Preizkuševalci ga morajo upoštevati.
The Similarity Tool is based on comparing specific pairs of goods and services. 
Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti temelji na primerjavi posameznih parov blaga in storitev.
A ‘pair' compares two ‘terms'. 
„Par“ se primerja z dvema „izrazoma“.
A ‘term' consists of a class number from the Nice Classification (1-45) and a textual element, that is to say, a specific product or service (including general categories of goods and services, such as clothing or education). 
„Izraz“ sestavljata številka razreda iz Nicejske klasifikacije (od 1 do 45) in besedni element, to je posamezni proizvod ali storitev (vključno s kategorijami blaga in storitev, kot so na primer oblačila ali izobraževanje).
There are five possible results of the search: identity, high degree of similarity, similarity, low degree of similarity and dissimilarity. 
V zbirki je pet možnih rezultatov iskanja: enakost, visoka stopnja podobnosti, podobnost, nizka stopnja podobnosti in različnost.
For each of the degrees of similarity, the tool indicates which criteria lead to each result. 
V orodju se za vsako stopnjo podobnosti prikažejo merila, ki so privedla do vsakega rezultata.
The Similarity Tool is constantly updated and revised as necessary in order to create a comprehensive and reliable source of reference. 
Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti se stalno posodablja in po potrebi revidira, da bi se ustvaril izčrpen in zanesljiv referenčni vir.
Since the tool gives, or will give, answers to specific comparisons, the Guidelines concentrate on defining the general principles and their application in practice. 
Ker orodje zagotavlja ali bo zagotavljalo odgovore na posamezne primerjave, je v Smernicah posebna pozornost namenjena opredelitvi splošnih načel in njihovi uporabi v praksi.
1.4 Definition of goods and services (terminology) 
Opredelitev blaga in storitev (terminologija)
1.4.1 Goods 
Blago
The EUTMR does not give a definition of goods and services. 
Uredba o blagovni znamki EU ne vsebuje opredelitve blaga in storitev.
Although the Nice Classification gives some general explanations to this effect in its introductory remarks, it refrains from clearly setting criteria for the distinction between goods and services. 
Čeprav Nicejska klasifikacija v ta namen vsebuje nekaj splošnih pojasnil v uvodnih opombah, pa ne vsebuje jasnih meril za razlikovanje med blagom in storitvami.
In principle, the word ‘goods' refers to any kind of item that may be traded. 
Beseda „blago“ se načeloma nanaša na vsak predmet, s katerim je mogoče trgovati.
Goods comprise raw materials (unprocessed plastics in Class 1), semi-finished products (plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture in Class 17) and finished products (plastic household containers in Class 21). 
Blago obsega surovine (umetne snovi v surovem stanju v razredu 1), polizdelke (ekstrudirana plastika za proizvodnjo v razredu 17) in končne izdelke (plastična posoda za gospodinjstvo v razredu 21).
They include natural and manufactured goods, such as agricultural products in Class 31 and machines and machine tools in Class 7. 
Vključuje naravne dobrine in proizvedeno blago, kot so na primer poljedelski proizvodi v razredu 31 ter stroji in orodni stroji v razredu 7.
However, sometimes it is not clear whether goods comprise only tangible physical products as opposed to services, which are intangible. 
Vendar včasih ni jasno, ali blago vključuje samo opredmetene fizične proizvode v nasprotju s storitvami, ki so neopredmetene.
The definition and thus the scope of protection are particularly relevant when it comes to ‘goods', such as electricity, that are intangible. 
Opredelitev in s tem obseg varstva sta zlasti pomembna pri „blagu“, kot je električna energija, ki je neopredmetena.
This question is already answered during the examination on classification and will not usually cause any problems in the comparison of goods and services. 
Odgovor na to vprašanje da že preverjanje razvrstitve in običajno ne povzroča težav pri primerjavi blaga in storitev.
1.4.2 Services 
Storitve
A service is any activity or benefit that one party can offer to another that is intangible and does not result in the transfer of ownership of any physical object. 
Storitev je vsaka dejavnost ali korist, ki jo lahko ena stranka zagotovi drugi, ki je neopredmetena in ki ni rezultat prenosa lastništva fizičnega predmeta.
In contrast to goods, a service is always intangible. 
Storitev je v nasprotju z blagom vedno neopredmeteno sredstvo.
Importantly, services comprise economic activities provided to third parties. 
Poudariti je treba, da storitve zajemajo gospodarske dejavnosti, ki se zagotavljajo tretjim osebam.
Advertising one's own goods is not a service but running an advertising agency (designing advertising campaigns for third parties) is. 
Oglaševanje svojega blaga ni storitev, je pa storitev vodenje oglaševalske agencije (oblikovanje oglaševalskih akcij za tretje osebe).
Similarly shop window dressing is only a service when provided for third parties, not when done in one's own shop. 
Podobno je aranžiranje izložb storitev le, kadar se zagotavlja za tretje osebe, ne pa, kadar se opravlja v lastni trgovini.
Selling or distributing one's own goods is not a service. 
Prodaja ali distribucija svojega blaga ni storitev.
Retail services are meant to cover the services around the actual sale of goods, such as providing the customer with an opportunity to conveniently see, compare or test the goods. 
Storitve na drobno zajemajo storitve v povezavi z dejansko prodajo blaga, kot je zagotovitev možnosti stranki, da si ustrezno ogleda blago, ga primerja ali preskusi.
For more detailed information, see Annex II, paragraph 7, Retail Services. 
Za podrobnejše informacije glej Prilogo II, odstavek 7, Storitve prodaje na drobno.
One indication for an activity to be considered a service under trade mark law is its independent economic value, that is to say, it is usually provided in exchange for some form of (monetary) compensation. 
Eden od znakov, da se dejavnost šteje za storitev v skladu z zakonodajo o znamki, je njena neodvisna tržna vrednost, to je, da se običajno zagotavlja v zameno za nekakšno (denarno) obliko nadomestila.
Otherwise, it could be a mere ancillary activity provided together with or after the purchase of a specific product. 
Sicer bi lahko bila le pomožna dejavnost, ki se zagotovi z nakupom nekega proizvoda ali po njem.
Delivery, including the transport of furniture that has previously been purchased (either in a physical establishment or online), is not an independent service falling under transport services in Class 39. 
Dostava, ki vključuje prevoz predhodno kupljenega pohištva (v fizični prodajalni ali na spletu), ni neodvisna storitev, ki bi spadala pod prevozniške storitve iz razreda 39.
However, the intention to make profit is not necessarily a criterion for defining whether an activity can qualify as a ‘service' (09/12/2008, C442/07, Radetzky, EU:C:2008:696, § 16-18). 
Vendar ustvarjanje dobička ni nujno merilo za določitev, da je mogoče neko dejavnost opredeliti kot „storitev“ (glej sodbo 09/12/2008, C442/07, Radetzky, EU:C:2008:696, § 16-18).
It is more a question of whether the service has an independent market area and targeted public rather than the way or form in which compensation is made for it. 
Bolj pomembno je vprašanje, ali ima storitev neodvisen trg in ciljno javnost, in ne način ali oblika nadomestila.
In common parlance the term ‘products' is used for both goods and services, for example, ‘financial products' instead of financial services. 
Izraz „proizvodi“ se v vsakdanjem jeziku uporablja tako za blago kot za storitve, na primer „finančni produkti“ namesto finančne storitve.
Whether terms in common parlance are described as ‘products' is immaterial to them being classified as goods or services. 
Če so izrazi v vsakdanjem jeziku opisani kot „proizvodi“, je njihova razvrstitev kot blago ali storitev nepomembna.
1.5 Determining the goods/services 
Določitev blaga ali storitev
1.5.1 The correct wording 
Ustrezno besedilo
As a preliminary, the correct wording of the lists of goods/services under consideration must be identified. 
Najprej je treba opredeliti ustrezno besedilo seznamov blaga ali storitev, ki se obravnavajo.
1.5.1.1 European Union trade marks 
Blagovne znamke Evropske unije
An application for an EUTM will be published in all the official languages of the European Union (Article 147(1) EUTMR). 
Prijava za blagovno znamko EU se objavi v vseh uradnih jezikih Evropske unije (člen 147(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Likewise, all entries in the Register of European Union trade marks (the Register) will be in all these languages (Article 147(2) EUTMR). 
Podobno se v vseh teh jezikih izvedejo vsi vpisi v register blagovnih znamk Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: register) (člen 147(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Both applications and entries in the Register are published in the EUTM Bulletin (Article 116(1)(a) and Article 116(2) EUTMR). 
Prijave in vpisi v register se objavijo v Biltenu (člen 116(1)(a) in (2) Uredbe o blagovnih znamkah EU).
In practice, occasional discrepancies may be found between: 
V praksi se lahko občasno najdejo neskladnosti med:
the translation of the wording of the list of goods and/or services of an EUTM (application or registration) published in the EUTM Bulletin, and 
prevodom besedila seznama blaga in/ali storitev blagovne znamke EU (za prijave ali registracije), objavljenim v Biltenu, in
the original wording as filed. 
izvirnim besedilom, kot je bilo vloženo.
In cases of such discrepancy, the definitive version of the list of goods and services is: 
V primeru takšnih neskladnosti je končna različica seznama blaga in storitev:
the text in the first language, if the first language is one of the five languages of the Office. 
besedilo v prvem jeziku, če je prvi jezik eden od petih uradnih jezikov Urada,
the text in the second language indicated by the applicant (Article 147(3) EUTMR), if the first language of the application is not one of the five languages of the Office. 
besedilo v drugem jeziku, ki ga navede prijavitelj (člen 147(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), če prvi jezik prijave ni eden od petih uradnih jezikov Urada.
This applies regardless of whether the EUTM (or EUTM application) is the earlier right or the contested application. 
To velja ne glede na to, ali je blagovna znamka EU (ali prijava blagovne znamke EU) prejšnja pravica ali izpodbijana prijava.
Where an incorrect translation of the list of goods and services is detected in an EUTM application that prevents the Office from carrying out a comparison of the goods and services, the list will either be sent for translation again or, in clear-cut cases, changed directly in the Register. 
Če se v prijavi blagovne znamke EU odkrije nepravilen prevod seznama blaga ali storitev, ki Uradu onemogoča izvedbo primerjave blaga in storitev, bo seznam vnovič poslan v prevod ali - v jasnih primerih - spremenjen neposredno v registru.
The Office will take its decisions on the basis of the correct translation. 
Urad bo sprejel odločitve na podlagi pravilnega prevoda.
Where an incorrect translation is detected in a registered EUTM, the Office will explain which language version of the goods and services is the definitive version for the purposes of the comparison. 
Če se nepravilen prevod odkrije v registrirani blagovni znamki EU, bo Urad pojasnil, katera jezikovna različica blaga in storitev je za namene primerjave končna različica.
1.5.1.2 Earlier national marks and international registrations 
Prejšnje nacionalne znamke in mednarodne registracije
The list of goods and services of the earlier marks on which the opposition is based must be submitted in the language of the opposition proceedings (Article 7(4) EUTMDR). 
Seznam blaga in storitev prejšnjih znamk, na katerih temelji ugovor, je treba predložiti v jeziku postopka ugovora (člen 7(4) Delegirane uredbe).
The Office does not require any certified translation; it accepts simple translations, drawn up by the opponent or its representative. 
Urad ne zahteva overjenega prevoda in sprejme preproste prevode, ki jih opravi vložnik ugovora ali njegov zastopnik.
The Office normally does not exercise the option available under Article 26 EUTMIR of requiring the translation to be certified by a sworn or official translator. 
Urad običajno ne uveljavi možnosti, ki jo ima na voljo na podlagi člena 26 Izvedbene uredbe in v skladu s katero lahko zahteva, da prevod overi zapriseženi ali uradni prevajalec.
Where the representative adds a declaration that the translation is true to the original, the Office will in principle not question this. 
Če zastopnik priloži izjavo, da je prevod v skladu z izvirnikom, Urad o tem načeloma ne bo podvomil.
For international registrations under the Madrid Agreement or Protocol, the language in which the international registration was registered is definitive (French, English or Spanish). 
Za mednarodne registracije na podlagi Madridskega sporazuma ali protokola je jezik, v katerem je registrirana mednarodna registracija, določen (francoščina, angleščina ali španščina).
However, where the language of the opposition procedure is not the language of the international registration, a translation must be supplied, as for earlier national marks. 
Vendar če jezik postopka ugovora ni jezik mednarodne registracije, je treba kot za prejšnje nacionalne znamke predložiti prevod.
Where a clearly incorrect translation is detected in the list of goods and services covered by the earlier national or international mark that prevents the Office from carrying out a comparison of goods and services, the opponent may be required under Article 26 EUTMIR to submit a certificate from a sworn or official translator confirming that the translation corresponds to the original. 
Če se na seznamu blaga in storitev, zajetih s prejšnjo nacionalno ali mednarodno znamko, odkrije očitno napačen prevod, ki Uradu onemogoča izvedbo primerjave blaga in storitev, bo vložnik ugovora v skladu s členom 26 Izvedbene uredbe lahko pozvan, naj predloži potrdilo zapriseženega ali uradnega prevajalca, s katerim se potrjuje, da se prevod ujema z izvirnim besedilom.
Alternatively, in clear-cut cases, the Office may, for the purposes of the decision, replace a clearly incorrect translation of a certain term by a correct translation, adding an explanation to that effect. 
Druga možnost je, da Urad v jasnih primerih za namene sprejetja odločitve očitno napačen prevod nekega izraza nadomesti s pravilnim prevodom in v zvezi s tem doda pojasnilo.
For example, where the term ‘bars' in Class 43 is translated as barras de cereales (cereal bars), it is a clearly incorrect translation as this term could never fall within Class 43. 
Na primer, če je izraz ploščice v razredu 19 preveden kot žitne ploščice, je to očitno napačen prevod, saj ta izraz ne bi nikoli spadal v razred 19.
1.5.2 The relevant scope 
Zadevni obseg
Comparison of the goods and services must be based on the wording indicated in the respective lists of goods/services. 
Primerjava blaga in storitev mora temeljiti na besedilu zadevnih seznamov blaga ali storitev.
Any actual or intended use not stipulated in the list of goods/services is not relevant for this comparison since it is part of the assessment of likelihood of confusion in relation to the goods/services on which the opposition is based and against which it is directed; it is not an assessment of actual confusion or infringement (16/06/2010, T487/08, Kremezin, EU:T:2010:237, § 71). 
Dejanska ali predvidena uporaba blaga in storitev, ki v seznamu blaga ali storitev ni določena, ni pomembna za primerjavo, saj je del presoje verjetnosti zmede v zvezi z blagom ali storitvami, na katerih temelji ugovor in zoper katere je usmerjen; to ni presoja dejanske zmede ali kršitve (16/06/2010, T487/08, Kremezin, EU:T:2010:237, § 71).
However, if proof of use of the earlier mark is validly requested and the submitted evidence is sufficient for only part of the goods/services listed, the earlier mark is deemed to be registered for only those goods/services (Article 47(2) EUTMR); consequently, the examination is restricted to those goods/services (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use). 
Če se upravičeno zahteva dokaz o uporabi prejšnje znamke in predložena dokazila zadostujejo samo za del navedenega blaga ali storitev, se za prejšnjo znamko šteje, da je bila registrirana samo za navedeno blago ali storitve (člen 47(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), zato se preizkus omeji na navedeno blago ali storitve (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi).
Moreover, in the case of the earlier mark, only the goods and services on which the opposition is validly based are pertinent. 
Poleg tega so pri prejšnji znamki pomembni samo blago in storitve, na podlagi katerih je veljavno utemeljen ugovor.
Hence, no account will be taken of goods/services: 
Zato ni treba upoštevati blaga ali storitev:
that cannot be taken into account for reasons of admissibility; 
ki jih ni mogoče upoštevati zaradi dopustnosti,
that have not been properly substantiated (e.g. only a partial translation of the list of goods/services was filed); or 
ki niso bili ustrezno utemeljeni (npr. predložen je bil samo delni prevod seznama blaga ali storitev) ali
on which the opposition is not, or is no longer, based. 
na katerih ne temelji ali nič več ne temelji ugovor.
Similarly, only those goods and services of the contested application against which the opposition is directed are taken into consideration. 
Podobno se upoštevajo samo blago in storitve izpodbijane prijave, zoper katere je usmerjen ugovor.