natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the purposes of exercising its discretionary power, the Office must take into account, in particular, the stage of proceedings and whether the facts or evidence are, prima facie, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and whether there are valid reasons for the late submission of the facts or evidence. 
Urad mora za namene uveljavljanja svoje diskrecijske pravice upoštevati zlasti fazo postopka in to, ali so dejstva ali dokazi na prvi pogled verjetno pomembni za izid zadeve in ali obstajajo tehtni razlogi za zapoznelo predložitev dokazov ali dokazil.
The stage of the proceedings indicates how advanced the proceedings are at the time of submitting the late evidence. 
Faza postopka kaže, v kako pozni fazi je postopek ob predložitvi prepoznih dokazov.
The late evidence is prima facie relevant, if it appears to have an impact on the assessment and outcome of the case. 
Prepozno predloženi dokazi so na prvi pogled pomembni, če se zdi, da vplivajo na presojo in izid zadeve.
Valid reasons are typically where the supplementing evidence was not yet available before the expiry of the substantiation time limit. 
Tehtni razlogi običajno obstajajo, če dopolnilni dokazi pred iztekom roka za utemeljitev še niso bili na voljo.
There may be other valid reasons. 
Obstajajo lahko drugi tehtni razlogi.
These factors are interdependent. 
Ti dejavniki so med medsebojno odvisni.
The later the stage of proceedings, the stronger must be the reason for late submission or the relevance of the evidence. 
Poznejša ko je faza postopka, tehtnejši mora biti razlog za zapoznelo predložitev ali pomembnost dokazov.
Therefore, additional facts or evidence can be accepted if, prima facie, they are likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case and are submitted at an early stage of the proceedings with a justification for why they are being submitted at this stage of the proceedings. 
Zato je dodatna dejstva ali dokaze mogoče sprejeti, če se na prvi pogled zdi, da so verjetno pomembni za izid zadeve, in če so predloženi v zgodnji fazi postopka skupaj z utemeljitvijo, zakaj so predloženi v zadevni fazi postopka.
There may be other relevant factors. 
Obstajajo lahko drugi upoštevni dejavniki.
The intention to prolong the proceedings by submitting evidence in parts (delaying tactics), if the circumstances of the case permit this conclusion, argues against the admission of late evidence. 
Ob nameri, da se postopek podaljša s predložitvijo dokazov v delih (taktika zavlačevanja), če okoliščine zadeve omogočajo to ugotovitev, se prepozno predloženi dokazi ne sprejmejo.
Also, the fact that the requirements to be proven are circumscribed in detail in the law or that the Office has explicitly drawn the opponent's attention to those requirements argues against admitting late evidence. 
Proti njihovemu sprejetju je tudi dejstvo, da so zahteve, ki jih je treba dokazati, podrobno zamejene s pravom ali da je Urad vložnika ugovora nanje izrecno opozoril.
The natural difficulties involved in obtaining the evidence are not, as such, a valid reason for its belated submission. 
Osnovne težave pri pridobivanju dokazov niso tehten razlog za zapoznelo predložitev.
4.2.6.3 Treatment of late evidence in proceedings 
Obravnava prepozno predloženih dokazov v postopku
Facts or evidence received after the set time limit will be forwarded to the other party for information purposes without any indication of whether it has been accepted or refused, and will be examined at a later stage, when taking the decision. 
Dejstva ali dokazi, prejeti po določenem roku, bodo posredovani drugi stranki v vednost brez navedbe, ali so bila sprejeti ali zavrnjeni, in bodo proučeni v poznejši fazi, in sicer v fazi sprejemanja odločitve.
The proceedings will be re-opened and a second round of observations will be granted if necessary - namely, if the Office is considering accepting late facts or evidence and the applicant has not yet had the opportunity to comment on them. 
Postopek bo znova odprt, pri čemer bo po potrebi odobren drugi krog za predložitev pripomb, tj. če Urad obravnava sprejetje prepozno predloženih dejstev ali dokazov in če prosilec še ni imel možnosti, da predloži pripombe k njim.
Application of the discretionary power must be reasoned in the decision concluding the opposition. 
Uveljavljanje diskrecijske pravice mora biti obrazloženo v odločbi, s katero se odloči o ugovoru.
However, where the initial evidence is in itself sufficient to prove the earlier rights and grounds of opposition invoked, there is no need to consider late additional evidence. 
Če pa so prvotni dokazi sami po sebi zadostni za dokaz prejšnjih pravic in razlogov za ugovor, ki se uveljavljajo, prepozno predloženih dodatnih dokazov ni treba upoštevati.
4.3 Translation/changes of language during the opposition proceedings 
Prevod/spremembe jezika med postopkom ugovora
Pursuant to general rules set in Article 146(9) EUTMR and Article 24 EUTMIR, most submissions of the parties in opposition proceedings have to be in the language of the proceedings in order to be taken into account. 
V skladu s splošnimi pravili iz člena 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 24 Izvedbene uredbe mora biti večina dokumentov in stališč, ki jih stranki predložita v postopku ugovora, v jeziku postopka, da bi se upoštevali.
However, for different submissions there are different rules to be applied. 
Za različne predložene dokumente in stališča pa se uporabljajo različna pravila.
4.3.1 Translations of evidence submitted to substantiate the opposition and of facts, evidence and arguments submitted by the opponent to complete its file 
Prevodi dokazov, predloženih za utemeljitev ugovora, ter dejstev, dokazov in navedb, ki jih za dopolnitev spisa predloži vložnik ugovora
Articles 7(4) and (5) and 8(1) EUTMDR 
Člen 7(4) in (5) ter člen 8(1) Delegirane uredbe
Article 25(1) EUTMIR 
Člen 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe
On the basis of Article 24 EUTMIR, a distinction should be made between 1) evidence of filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, and any provisions of the applicable national law; 2) other evidence submitted to substantiate the opposition; and 3) facts and arguments submitted by the opponent to complete its file. 
Na podlagi člena 24 Izvedbene uredbe je treba razlikovati med 1) potrdili o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju oziroma enakovrednimi dokumenti in vsemi določbami nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja, 2) drugimi dokazi, predloženimi za utemeljitev ugovora, ter 3) dejstvi in navedbami, ki jih za dopolnitev spisa predloži vložnik ugovora.
4.3.1.1 Translation of evidence of filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, and provisions of the applicable national law 
Prevodi potrdil o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovrednih dokumentov ter določb nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja
Pursuant to Article 7(4) EUTMDR, any filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, as well as any provisions of the applicable national law governing the acquisition of rights and their scope of protection, submitted by the opponent to substantiate the opposition must be either in the language of the proceedings, or be accompanied by a translation into that language. 
V skladu s členom 7(4) Delegirane uredbe morajo biti vsa potrdila o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju oziroma enakovredni dokumenti - in katere koli določbe nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja in ureja pridobivanje pravic in obseg njihovega varstva -, ki jih predloži vložnik ugovora za utemeljitev ugovora, v jeziku postopka ali se morajo predložiti skupaj s prevodom v ta jezik.
Such translations must be submitted by the opponent on its own motion and within the time limit for substantiation of the opposition. 
Vložnik ugovora mora takšne prevode na lastno pobudo predložiti v roku za utemeljitev ugovora.
Only what is submitted and translated within this time limit is taken into account. 
Upoštevajo se samo dokumenti in dokazi, ki so predloženi in prevedeni v tem roku.
The requirement for the evidence of substantiation to be translated also relates to online evidence referred to by the opponent, where the language of the online evidence is not the same as the language of the proceedings. 
Zahteva glede prevoda dokazov o utemeljitvi se nanaša tudi na spletne dokaze, na katere se sklicuje vložnik ugovora, če jezik spletnih dokazov ni jezik postopka.
This follows from Article 7(4) EUTMDR, which states that ‘“evidence accessible online” … shall [also either] be in the language of the proceedings or shall be accompanied by a translation into that language'. 
To izhaja iz člena 7(4) Delegirane uredbe, ki določa, da so „dokazil[a], dostopn[a] na spletu, [...] v jeziku postopka ali se predložijo skupaj s prevodom v ta jezik“.
Article 25(1) EUTMIR requires the translation to reproduce the structure and contents of the original document. 
V skladu s členom 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe mora prevod po zgradbi in vsebini ustrezati izvirnemu dokumentu.
For translations of online evidence of substantiation, submission of the translation without the original will be accepted, as long as the document to which it refers is identified correctly. 
Kar zadeva prevode spletnih dokazov o utemeljitvi, bo sprejeta predložitev prevoda brez izvirnega dokumenta, če je dokument, na katerega se prevod nanaša, pravilno opredeljen.
The Office does not consider that information already given in the language of the proceedings in the notice of opposition, or in documents attached thereto or submitted later (e.g. explanation of grounds, lists of earlier marks, etc.), amounts to a valid translation of a registration document, such as a registration certificate, even where such indications have been accepted for admissibility purposes. 
Urad informacij, ki so v ugovoru ali dokumentih, priloženih k ugovoru ali predloženih pozneje (npr. obrazložitev razlogov, seznami prejšnjih znamk itd.), že navedene v jeziku postopka, ne šteje za veljaven prevod dokumenta o registraciji, kot je potrdilo o registraciji, tudi če so bile takšne navedbe sprejete za namene preizkusa dopustnosti.
The translation has to be on a stand-alone basis and cannot be assembled from fragments taken from other documents. 
Prevod mora biti samostojen dokument in ne sme biti sestavljen iz odlomkov iz drugih dokumentov.
Article 25(1) EUTMIR provides that the opponent may indicate that only parts of the document are relevant, and therefore the translation may be limited to those parts only. 
Člen 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe določa, da lahko vložnik ugovora navede, da so pomembni samo deli dokumenta, zato je lahko prevod omejen le na te dele.
However, only irrelevant administrative indications (e.g. previous transfers of ownership that do not affect the opposition, administrative entries on fees, etc.) with no bearing on the case may be omitted from the translation. 
Vendar se iz prevoda lahko izpustijo le nepomembne upravne navedbe (npr. prejšnji prenosi lastništva, ki ne vplivajo na ugovor, upravni vnosi o pristojbinah itd.), ki ne vplivajo na zadevo.
The provisions of Article 25(1) EUTMIR do not imply that the opponent has discretion to decide not to translate the elements required by the Regulation, specifically those listed in Article 7(2) EUTMDR as required for substantiating the earlier rights. 
Določbe člena 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe ne pomenijo, da ima vložnik ugovora diskrecijsko pravico za odločitev, da ne bo prevedel elementov, ki se zahtevajo z uredbo, in sicer tistih, navedenih v členu 7(2) Delegirane uredbe, kot se zahtevajo za utemeljitev prejšnjih pravic.
Where the Regulation establishes that an element must be proven, as is the case for existence, validity, scope of protection of earlier rights and entitlement to file the opposition, and these particular parts of the evidence are not translated, the opposition may be rejected as non-substantiated. 
Če Uredba določa, da mora biti neki element dokazan, kot velja za obstoj, veljavnost, obseg varstva prejšnjih pravic in upravičenost do vložitve ugovora, in ti konkretni deli dokazov niso prevedeni, se ugovor lahko zavrne kot neutemeljen.
The list of INID codes and their explanations are attached as Appendix 1 to Standard ST 60 (‘Recommendation concerning bibliographic data relating to marks'), available on WIPO's website. 
60 - Recommendation Concerning Bibliographic Data Relating to Marks (Priporočilo o bibliografskih podatkih v zvezi z znamkami), ki je na voljo na spletišču organizacije WIPO.
Where the opposition is based on only some of the goods and services covered by the earlier right, it is sufficient to submit only a translation of the goods and services on which the opposition is based. 
Če ugovor temelji samo na nekaterem blagu in storitvah, zajetih s prejšnjo pravico, zadostuje samo predložitev prevoda blaga in storitev, na katerih temelji ugovor.
When the entire original document is in the language of the proceedings except for the list of goods and services, there will be no need to submit a complete translation following the structure of the original document. 
Kadar je celotni izvirni dokument, razen seznama blaga in storitev, v jeziku postopka, ni treba predložiti popolnega prevoda ob upoštevanju zgradbe izvirnega dokumenta.
In this case, it is acceptable if only the goods and services on which the opposition is based have been translated separately in the notice of opposition or in documents attached thereto or submitted later within the time limit to substantiate the opposition. 
V takšnem primeru je sprejemljivo, če so bili v ugovoru ali dokumentih, priloženih k ugovoru ali predloženih pozneje, ločeno prevedeni samo blago in storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor, in to v roku za utemeljitev ugovora.
The same applies to extracts/certificates that make use of INID or national codes, where the only information that still needs to be translated into the language of the proceedings is the list of goods and services. 
Enako velja za izpiske/potrdila, v katerih se uporabljajo kode INID ali nacionalne kode in pri katerih je edina informacija, ki jo je še vedno treba prevesti v jezik postopka, seznam blaga in storitev.
The Office accepts simple translations, drawn up by anybody. 
Urad priznava navadne prevode, ki jih pripravi kdor koli.
The Office normally does not make use of its faculty to require the translation to be certified by a sworn or official translator unless serious doubts arise regarding the accuracy or content of the translation. 
Urad običajno ne izkoristi možnosti, na podlagi katere lahko zahteva, da prevod overi zapriseženi ali uradni prevajalec, razen če se pojavijo resni dvomi glede točnosti ali vsebine prevoda.
Where the representative adds a declaration that the translation is true to the original, the Office will, in principle, not question this. 
Če zastopnik priloži izjavo, da je prevod v skladu z izvirnikom, Urad načeloma o tem ne bo podvomil.
The Office even accepts handwritten text on the copies of the original certificates giving the meaning of the various entries in the language of the proceedings, provided of course that they are complete and legible. 
Urad priznava celo ročno napisano besedilo na kopijah originalnih potrdil, s katerim je naveden pomen različnih vnosov v jeziku postopka, če je to besedilo seveda popolno in berljivo.
Extracts from commercial databases cannot be considered valid translations of an official document, unless they reproduce the structure and contents of the original document. 
Izpiskov iz komercialnih podatkovnih zbirk ni mogoče šteti za veljavne prevode uradnega dokumenta, razen če se ujemajo z zgradbo in vsebino izvirnega dokumenta.
Where, when assessing the substantiation, it is detected that the translation does not accurately reflect the structure and content of the online database relied upon by the opponent, the Office will, pursuant to Article 97(1)(b) EUTMR, ask the opponent for clarification. 
Če se pri presoji utemeljitve ugotovi, da prevod ne ustreza natančno zgradbi in vsebini spletne podatkovne zbirke, na katero se opira vložnik ugovora, bo Urad v skladu s členom 97(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU vložnika ugovora pozval, naj predloži pojasnitev.
This would require the opponent to submit evidence of the contents of the original extract to which the translation relates. 
Vložnik ugovora bi moral predložiti dokaze o vsebini izvirnega izpiska, na katerega se prevod nanaša.
In the absence of such evidence, or if the evidence shows a discrepancy between the translation submitted and the original extract as regards the structure and content, the earlier mark will be deemed to be non-substantiated. 
Če takšnih dokazov ni oziroma če je iz dokazov razvidna neskladnost med predloženim prevodom in izvirnim izpiskom, kar zadeva zgradbo in vsebino, se bo štelo, da prejšnja znamka ni bila utemeljena.
4.3.1.2 Translations of evidence submitted to substantiate the opposition other than filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, or provisions of the applicable national law 
Prevodi dokazov, predloženih za utemeljitev ugovora, ki niso potrdila o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovredni dokumenti ali določbe nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja
Article 7(4) EUTMDR also addresses the language regime applicable to evidence submitted by the opposing party to substantiate the opposition other than filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, and provisions of applicable national law. 
V členu 7(4) Delegirane uredbe se obravnava tudi jezikovna ureditev, ki se uporablja za dokaz, ki jih predloži stranka, ki ugovarja, za utemeljitev ugovora, pri čemer ti dokazi niso potrdila o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovredni dokumenti in določbe nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja.
Such evidence encompasses evidence of reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR) and evidence of use of more than mere local significance (Article 8(4) EUTMR). 
Takšni dokazi obsegajo dokaze o ugledu (člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU) in dokaze o uporabi, ki je več kot le lokalnega pomena (člen 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
If the evidence is submitted in an EU language that is not the language of the proceedings, the Office may, pursuant to Article 24 EUTMIR, and either of its own motion or upon reasoned request by the applicant, require the opponent to submit a translation of the evidence into the language of the proceedings within a specified time limit. 
Če so dokazi predloženi v jeziku EU, ki ni jezik postopka, lahko Urad v skladu s členom 24 Izvedbene uredbe in na lastno pobudo ali na utemeljeno zahtevo prijavitelja od vložnika ugovora zahteva, naj v določenem roku predloži prevod dokazov v jeziku postopka.
In other words, the opponent has no obligation to submit the translation on its own motion, unless it is requested to do so by the Office. 
Z drugimi besedami, vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti prevoda na svojo pobudo, razen če to od njega zahteva Urad.
Such language regime mirrors the one applicable to proof of use; hence, rules regarding the translation of proof of use equally apply to the abovementioned evidence for substantiation. 
Takšna jezikovna ureditev izraža jezikovno ureditev, ki se uporablja za dokaz o uporabi, zato se pravila v zvezi s prevodom dokaza o uporabi uporabljajo tudi za zgoraj navedeni dokazi za utemeljitev.
For further information on applicable rules, see paragraph 4.3.4, Proof of use, below. 
Za dodatne informacije o pravilih, ki se uporabljajo, glej odstavek 4.3.4 v nadaljevanju, Dokaz o uporabi.
4.3.1.3 Translations of facts and arguments submitted by the opponent to complete its file 
Prevodi dejstev in navedb, ki jih za dopolnitev spisa predloži vložnik ugovora
The Office may consider facts and arguments filed by the opponent in support of the opposition only if they are submitted in the language of the proceedings or are accompanied by a translation within the time limit for substantiation. 
Urad lahko upošteva dejstva in navedbe, ki jih v podporo ugovoru predloži vložnik ugovora, le, če so v roku za utemeljitev predloženi v jeziku postopka, ali če jim je priložen prevod.
The Office will not request the opponent to send a translation; it has to send one on its own initiative. 
Urad od vložnika ugovora ne bo zahteval, naj pošlje prevod; poslati ga mora na svojo pobudo.
If no translation or only a partial translation has been submitted within the time limit set, parts of written submissions that have not been translated into the language of proceedings will, pursuant to Article 7(5) EUTMDR, not be taken into account. 
Če prevod v določenem roku ni predložen ali je predložen le delni prevod, se deli pisnih vlog, ki niso bili prevedeni v jezik postopka, v skladu s členom 7(5) Delegirane uredbe ne bodo upoštevali.
If the submissions are not in the language of the proceedings, they must be translated within the time limit specified for submitting the original document, namely within the time limit for substantiation of the opposition. 
Če vloge niso v jeziku postopka, jih je treba prevesti v roku, določenem za predložitev izvirnega dokumenta, in sicer v roku za utemeljitev ugovora.
If this is not done, the legal consequence is that written submissions, or parts thereof, that have not been translated in this time limit are not taken into account. 
Pravna posledica opustitve tega dejanja je, da se pisne vloge ali njihovi deli, ki niso bili prevedeni v tem roku, ne upoštevajo.
However, if documents proving the existence and validity of the earlier right have not been translated, the opposition must be refused as unfounded straight away. 
Če pa dokumenti, ki dokazujejo obstoj in veljavnost prejšnje pravice, niso bili prevedeni, je treba ugovor takoj zavrniti kot neutemeljen.
4.3.2 Translation of further observations 
Prevod dodatnih pripomb
Article 146(9) EUTMR 
Člen 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 8(2), (4) and (6) EUTMDR 
Člen 8(2), (4) in (6) Delegirane uredbe
According to Article 146(9) EUTMR, the applicant's first reply or the opponent's reply to the applicant's observations may be in any language of the Office. 
V skladu s členom 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je lahko prvi odgovor prijavitelja ali odgovor vložnika ugovora na prijaviteljeve pripombe v katerem koli jeziku Urada.
It is to be noted that if the applicant's first reply or the opponent's counter-reply is not in the language of proceedings but in one of the languages of the Office, the submission will not be taken into account unless the applicant or the opponent submits a translation of these documents in the language of the proceedings within the time limit of 1 month from the date of receipt of the original by the Office. 
Treba je upoštevati, da se vloga ne bo upoštevala, če prvi odgovor prijavitelja ali replika vložnika ugovora ni v jeziku postopka, ampak v enem od jezikov Urada, razen če prijavitelj ali vložnik ugovora v enem mesecu od datuma, ko Urad prejme izvirnik, predloži prevod teh dokumentov v jeziku postopka.
The Office will not request the parties to send a translation; the parties have to send one on their own initiative. 
Urad od strank ne bo zahteval, naj pošljeta prevod; stranki ga morata poslati na svojo pobudo.
Example 1 
1. primer
The language of opposition is English and the applicant has until 26/06/2017 to submit observations in reply to the notice of opposition. 
Jezik ugovora je angleščina in prijavitelj lahko pripombe v odgovor na ugovor predloži do 26. junija 2017.
If, on 20/06/2017, it submits its observations in reply to the opposition in German, it must file its translation by 20/07/2017. 
Če pripombe v odgovor na ugovor predloži 20. junija 2017 v nemščini, mora prevod predložiti do 20. julija 2017.
If it does file the translation on or before 20/07/2017, both the original submission and the translation must be taken into account, notwithstanding that the original time limit for filing observations expired on 26/06/2017. 
Če prevod predloži pred 20. julijem 2017 ali na ta datum, je treba upoštevati prvotno predložene pripombe in prevod, ne glede na to, da se je prvotni rok za predložitev pripomb iztekel 26. junija 2017.
Example 2 
2. primer