natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For all other costs (which will apply in extremely rare cases), a bill and supporting evidence are needed, but it suffices that these make it plausible (rather than provide fully fledged proof) that the costs have been incurred. 
Za vse druge stroške (ki se pojavljajo zelo redko) so potrebni obračun stroškov in dokazov, vendar zadostuje že, da je iz njih očitno razvidno, da so stroški nastali (in ne da zagotavljajo popolne dokaze).
5.6.4 Review of fixing of costs 
Ponovna presoja določitve stroškov
Article 109(8) EUTMR 
Člen 109(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
If one of the parties disagrees with the amounts fixed, it can ask for a review of the decision. 
Če se ena od strank ne strinja z določenimi zneski, lahko zahteva ponovno presojo odločitve.
The request must state the reasons and be filed within 1 month of the date of notification of the fixation. 
Zahtevo mora obrazložiti in jo vložiti v enem mesecu od datuma uradnega obvestila o določitvi.
The request is only deemed to be filed when the fee for review of EUR 100 has been paid. 
Zahteva se šteje za vloženo le, če je plačana pristojbina za ponovno presojo v višini 100 EUR.
There are no reimbursable costs in the review procedure (16/12/2004, R 503/20014, BIOLACT / BIO). 
Stroški v postopku ponovne presoje se ne povrnejo (16/12/2004, R 503/20014, BIOLACT / BIO).
6 Procedural Issues 
Postopkovna vprašanja
6.1 Correction of mistakes 
Popravljanje napak
Applying Article 49(2) EUTMR, which refers to the EUTM application, by analogy, obvious mistakes in the notice of opposition may be corrected. 
Očitne napake v ugovoru se lahko popravijo tako, da se po analogiji uporabi člen 49(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ki se nanaša na prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
The Office considers ‘obvious error' in relation to Article 49(2) EUTMR and Article 102(1) EUTMR to be understood as meaning mistakes that obviously require correction, in the sense that nothing else would have been intended than what is offered as the correction. 
Urad glede na člen 49(2) in člen 102(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU meni, da je treba „očitno napako“ razumeti kot napako, ki jo je očitno treba popraviti, in sicer v smislu, da ne bi bilo mišljeno nič drugega kot tisto, kar se ponuja kot popravek.
For example, if the opponent's details appear where the representative's should appear, this can be considered an obvious mistake. 
Na primer, če so podatki o vložniku ugovora navedeni tam, kjer bi morali biti navedeni podatki o zastopniku, se to lahko šteje za očitno napako.
6.1.2 Correction of mistakes and errors in publications 
Popravljanje napak in pomot v objavah
Article 44(3) EUTMR 
Člen 44(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Where the publication of the application contains a mistake or error attributable to the Office, the Office will correct the mistake or error on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant. 
Če objava prijave vsebuje napako ali pomoto, ki jo je mogoče pripisati Uradu, bo Urad napako ali pomoto popravil na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo prijavitelja.
The corrections effected under this rule have to be published. 
Popravke, izvedene na podlagi tega pravila, je treba objaviti.
If the correction concerns mistakes that do not affect the opposition, it will be published when the EUTM is registered. 
Če se popravek nanaša na napake, ki ne vplivajo na ugovor, se ga objavi, ko je blagovna znamka EU registrirana.
Where the correction leads to an extension of the list of goods or services or concerns the representation of the mark, a new opposition period is opened, but only in respect of the corrected parts. 
Če popravek povzroči razširitev seznama blaga ali storitev oziroma se nanaša na prikaz znamke, se določi nov rok za vložitev ugovora, vendar le v zvezi s popravljenimi deli.
If oppositions were filed after the ‘first' publication of the EUTM application, the opponents will have to be informed of the republication. 
Če so bili ugovori vloženi po „prvi“ objavi prijave blagovne znamke EU, bo treba vložnike ugovorov obvestiti tudi o ponovni objavi.
The opponents that opposed the ‘first' publication do not have to file a new opposition. 
Vložnikom ugovorov, ki so ugovor vložili zoper prvo objavo, ni treba vložiti novega ugovora.
The proceedings must be suspended until the opposition period following the ‘second' publication has expired. 
Postopek je treba začasno ustaviti, dokler se ne izteče rok za vložitev ugovora v zvezi z drugo objavo.
If a ‘first publication opponent' wishes to withdraw its opposition as a consequence of the republication, the proceedings should be closed and the opposition fee should be refunded (see paragraph 5.4.1.2 above). 
Če želi „vložnik ugovora zoper prvo objavo“ umakniti svoj ugovor na podlagi ponovne objave, je treba postopek končati, pristojbino za ugovor pa povrniti (glej odstavek 5.4.1.2 zgoraj).
6.2 Time limits 
Roki
Articles 101(1) and 146(9) EUTMR 
Člen 101(1) in člen 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 63 EUTMDR 
Člen 63 Delegirane uredbe
Time limits are an essential tool for conducting orderly and reasonably swift proceedings. 
Roki so osnovno orodje za vodenje pravilnih in razumno hitrih postopkov.
They are a matter of public policy, and rigorous compliance with them is necessary for ensuring clarity and legal certainty. 
Spadajo v javno politiko, njihovo dosledno izpolnjevanje pa je nujno za zagotavljanje jasnosti in pravne varnosti.
For general information on time limits and continuation of proceedings, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits. 
Za splošne informacije o rokih in nadaljevanju postopka glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki.
6.2.1 Extension of time limits in opposition proceedings 
Podaljšanje rokov v postopku ugovora
6.2.1.1 Non-extendable and extendable time limits 
Roki, ki jih ni mogoče podaljšati, in tisti, ki jih je mogoče podaljšati
Article 101(1) EUTMR 
Člen 101(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
A time limit cannot be extended if its length is set by the Regulation. 
Roka ni mogoče podaljšati, če je njegovo trajanje določeno z uredbo.
the 3-month opposition period to file an opposition; 
Člen 46(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 46(3) EUTMR 
trimesečni rok za vložitev ugovora;
the 3-month time limit to pay the opposition fee; 
Člen 46(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 141(3) EUTMR 
trimesečni rok za plačilo pristojbine za ugovor;
the 2-month time limit to remedy deficiencies according to Article 5(5) EUTMDR. 
dvomesečni rok za odpravo pomanjkljivosti v skladu s členom 5(5) Delegirane uredbe.
Rule 101(1) EUTMR 
Člen 101(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
The length of extendable time limits is specified by the Office. 
Roki, ki jih je mogoče podaljšati, so tako dolgi, kot določi Urad.
For example, the time limit to submit observations in reply to the notice of opposition is an extendable time limit. 
Na primer, rok za predložitev pripomb v odgovor na ugovor je rok, ki ga je mogoče podaljšati.
6.2.1.2 Request made in time 
Pravočasno vložena prošnja
Note that extensions of the cooling-off period have a special regime. 
Treba je upoštevati, da za podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje velja posebna ureditev.
For further details, see above under paragraph 3.2, Extension of the cooling-off period. 
Za dodatne podrobnosti glej odstavek 3.2 zgoraj, Podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje.
For an extension to be granted, the request has to fulfil the following conditions: 
Za odobritev podaljšanja morajo biti izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the time limit must be extendable; 
rok mora biti mogoče podaljšati,
the extension has to be requested by the party concerned or jointly by both parties; 
za podaljšanje mora zaprositi zadevna stranka ali obe stranki skupaj,
the request has to be signed; 
prošnja mora biti podpisana,
the original time limit must not have expired already; 
prvotni rok se še ni iztekel,
the language regime must be respected (i.e. if the request is not in the language of the proceedings, a translation must be submitted within 1 month of filing; otherwise the request will not be taken into account). 
upoštevati je treba jezikovno ureditev (tj. če prošnja ni v jeziku postopka, je treba v enem mesecu od vložitve predložiti prevod, sicer se prošnja ne bo upoštevala).
An extension will only be possible if the relevant request is filed and received before the expiry of the original term (30/01/2014, C324/13 P, Patrizia Rocha, EU:C:2014:60). 
Podaljšanje bo mogoče samo, če je zadevna prošnja vložena in prejeta pred iztekom prvotnega roka (30/01/2014, C324/13 P, Patrizia Rocha, EU:C:2014:60).
If a request for extension is received by the Office after the expiry of the time limit, it must be rejected. 
Če Urad prošnjo za podaljšanje prejme po izteku roka, jo mora zavrniti.
As a general rule, the first request for an extension that is received in time will be considered appropriate and will be granted for a period of 2 months (or less, if so requested). 
Načeloma se za prvo pravočasno prispelo prošnjo, ki se šteje za ustrezno, odobri podaljšanje za obdobje dveh mesecev (ali manj, če je tako zahtevano).
However, any subsequent request for an extension of the same time limit will be refused, unless the party requesting it duly explains and justifies the exceptional circumstances that prevented it from meeting the original time limit and the first extension, and why a further extension is necessary. 
Vendar se vsaka poznejša prošnja za podaljšanje istega roka zavrne, razen če stranka, ki zaprosi za podaljšanje, ustrezno pojasni in utemelji izjemne okoliščine, ki so ji preprečile izpolniti prvotni rok in njegovo prvo podaljšanje, ter navede razloge, zakaj je potrebno nadaljnje podaljšanje.
General or vague explanations will not justify a second extension. 
Splošna ali nejasna pojasnila ne bodo zadostovala za drugo podaljšanje.
The request must always be accompanied by evidence and/or supporting documentation. 
Prošnji morajo biti vedno priloženi dokazi in/ali spremna dokumentacija.
On the other hand, circumstances that are within the control of the party concerned are not ‘exceptional circumstances'. 
Po drugi strani okoliščine, ki so pod nadzorom zadevne stranke, niso izjemne okoliščine.
For example, last-minute discussions with the other party are not ‘exceptional circumstances'. 
Na primer, pogovori z drugo stranko v zadnjem trenutku niso izjemne okoliščine.
They are within the control of the parties. 
Stranki imata nadzor nad njimi.
The request has to be filed by the party affected by the time limit. 
Prošnjo mora vložiti stranka, na katero rok vpliva.
For example, if the applicant has to submit observations in reply to the notice of opposition, it can only be the applicant that asks for an extension. 
Na primer, če mora prijavitelj predložiti pripombe v odgovor na ugovor, lahko za podaljšanje zaprosi le on.
For more information on extensions of time limits, consult the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits, paragraph 3.1.3. 
Za več informacij o podaljšanjih rokov glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki, odstavek 3.1.3.
6.2.1.3 Extension of a time limit by the Office on its own initiative 
Podaljšanje roka na lastno pobudo Urada
The Office can extend a time limit on its own initiative, if and when particular reasons make it necessary. 
Urad lahko podaljša rok na svojo pobudo, če in kadar je to potrebno iz posebnih razlogov.
For example, a request to extend a time limit without any justification is received by the Office 20 days before the end of the time limit to file observations but is not dealt with until after expiry of the time limit. 
Na primer, Urad 20 dni pred iztekom roka za predložitev pripomb prejme prošnjo za podaljšanje roka brez utemeljitve, vendar jo obravnava šele po izteku tega roka.
Because refusal of the request after expiry of the time limit will disproportionately harm the interests of the party who requested the extension, the Office extends the time limit by the number of days that were left when the party submitted its request, in this case 20 days. 
Ker bo zavrnitev prošnje po izteku roka nesorazmerno škodovala interesom stranke, ki je zaprosila za podaljšanje, Urad podaljša rok za število dni, ki je preostalo do izteka roka, ko je stranka predložila svojo prošnjo, v tem primeru za 20 dni.
This practice is based on the rules of fair administration. 
Ta praksa temelji na pravilih dobrega upravljanja.
Where a request for extension of an extendable time limit is filed and received before expiry of the time limit (30/01/2014, C324/13 P, Patrizia Rocha, EU:C:2014:60), the party concerned will be granted at least 1 day, even if the request for extension arrived on the last day of this time limit. 
Če je bila prošnja za podaljšanje roka, ki ga je mogoče podaljšati, vložena in prejeta pred iztekom tega roka (30/01/2014, C324/13 P, Patrizia Rocha, EU:C:2014:60), se zadevni stranki odobri podaljšanje za vsaj en dan, tudi če je prošnja za podaljšanje prispela zadnji dan tega roka.
6.2.1.4 Signature 
Podpis
A joint request has to be signed by both parties and has to be received within the time limit for which an extension is requested. 
Skupno prošnjo morata podpisati obe stranki, prispeti pa mora v roku, za katerega se zahteva podaljšanje.
A request signed by one of the representatives, assuring the Office that the other party agrees to the extension, is not acceptable. 
Prošnja, ki jo podpiše eden od zastopnikov, ki Uradu zagotavlja, da se druga stranka strinja s podaljšanjem, ni sprejemljiva.
For joint requests submitted in one single submission by electronic means, the indication of the name of the sender is deemed to be equivalent to its signature; however, the signature of the other party must be present in order for the request to be acceptable. 
Za skupne prošnje, predložene elektronsko v okviru iste predložitve, se navedba imena pošiljatelja šteje za enakovredno njegovemu podpisu; da pa je prošnja sprejemljiva, je treba predložiti podpis druge stranke.
6.3 Suspension 
Začasna ustavitev
Article 9(4) and Article 71 EUTMDR 
Člen 9(4) in člen 71 Delegirane uredbe
The Office can suspend opposition proceedings either ex officio or at the request of either one or both parties. 
Urad lahko po uradni dolžnosti ali na zahtevo obeh strank ali ene od njiju začasno ustavi postopek ugovora.
6.3.1 Suspension requested by both parties 
Začasna ustavitev na zahtevo obeh strank
According to Article 71(2) EUTMDR, if both parties request suspension after expiry of the cooling-off period, upon a reasoned request (for example, negotiations towards a friendly settlement), the suspension is granted. 
V skladu s členom 71(2) Delegirane uredbe se začasna ustavitev odobri na zahtevo obeh strank po izteku obdobja za pobotanje, in sicer mora biti ta zahteva utemeljena (npr. pogajanja o sporazumni rešitvi).
In this case, and regardless of the period requested by the parties, the first suspension will be granted for a period of 6 months, with the parties being given the possibility of opting out. 
V takšnem primeru in ne glede na obdobje, ki ga zahtevata stranki, bo prva začasna ustavitev postopka odobrena za šest mesecev, pri čemer bosta lahko stranki končali to obdobje.
The process for opting out is the same as for the extension of the cooling-off period: if one party opts out, the suspension will end 14 days after the parties have been informed thereof. 
Postopek za končanje tega obdobja je enak kot za podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje: če ena od strank konča to obdobje, začasna ustavitev postopka preneha 14 dni po tem, ko sta stranki o tem obveščeni.
The proceedings will resume the day after, and the party whose time limit was pending at the moment of suspension will be granted a time limit of 2 months. 
Postopek se bo znova nadaljeval naslednji dan, stranki, katere rok je miroval ob začasni ustavitvi, pa bo odobren dvomesečni rok.
It is not possible to opt out during the last month of the suspended period, and any requests to do so will be rejected. 
Iz postopka ni mogoče izstopiti v zadnjem mesecu začasno ustavljenega postopka, vse zahteve za izstop iz postopka pa bodo zavrnjene.
A joint request for suspension will not be granted if it is received within the cooling-off period, because the purpose of the cooling-off period is to set a time frame for negotiations before the adversarial stage begins. 
Skupna zahteva za začasno ustavitev ne bo odobrena, če je prejeta v obdobju za pobotanje, saj je namen tega obdobja določiti časovni okvir za pogajanja pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka.
In principle, the parties may obtain extensions of the suspension by jointly filing a reasoned request (for example indicating that the negotiations towards a friendly settlement are ongoing). 
Strankama se lahko načeloma odobrijo podaljšanja začasne ustavitve, če skupaj vložita utemeljeno zahtevo (v kateri na primer navedeta, da potekajo pogajanja za sporazumno rešitev).
Such requests will be granted for further 6-month periods. 
Takšne zahteve bodo odobrene za nadaljnja šestmesečna obdobja.
However, the maximum duration of this suspension of the proceedings is limited to 2 years, as set out in Article 71(2) EUTMDR - a duration that is to be understood as 2 years cumulative over the course of the proceedings. 
Kot pa je določeno v členu 71(2) Delegirane uredbe, je ta začasna ustavitev postopka omejena na največ dve leti, pri čemer se razume, da je to obdobje skupno dve leti med postopkom.
Consequently, requests for suspension submitted by both parties must be rejected if the suspended period exceeds the maximum of 2 years as a whole. 
Zato je treba zahteve za začasno ustavitev na podlagi pogajanj v teku ustaviti, če obdobje začasne ustavitve skupaj presega dve leti.
Requests for suspension based on ongoing negotiations submitted by only one of the parties will be rejected. 
Zahteve za začasno ustavitev na podlagi pogajanj v teku, ki jih predloži le ena od strank, bodo zavrnjene.
6.3.2 Suspensions by the Office ex officio or at the request of one of the parties 
Urad postopek začasno ustavi po uradni dolžnosti ali na zahtevo ene od strank
The Office may suspend the opposition proceedings ex officio or at the request of one party under a variety of circumstances: 
Urad lahko začasno ustavi postopek ugovora po uradni dolžnosti ali na zahtevo ene od strank v različnih okoliščinah:
the opposition is based on an application for registration of a trade mark (including conversion); 
ugovor temelji na prijavi za registracijo blagovne znamke (vključno s konverzijo),
the opposition is based on an application for registration of a geographical indication or designation of origin. 
ugovor temelji na prijavi za registracijo geografske označbe ali označbe porekla,
the earlier right is at risk (under opposition or cancellation); 
prejšnja pravica je ogrožena (v postopku ugovora ali izbrisa),
there are third-party observations that raise serious doubts as to the registrability of the EUTM application (see paragraph 4.6 above); 
pripombe tretjih oseb vzbujajo resne dvome glede možnosti registracije prijave blagovne znamke EU (glej odstavek 4.6 zgoraj),
there are errors in the publication of the contested application that require the mark to be republished; 
v objavi izpodbijane prijave so napake, zaradi katerih je treba znamko znova objaviti,
a transfer is pending on earlier EUTMs/EUTM applications or contested EUTM applications. 
v teku je prenos v zvezi s prejšnjimi blagovnimi znamkami EU/prijavami blagovne znamke EU ali izpodbijanimi prijavami blagovne znamke EU.
It should be noted that there is no obligation in any of the abovementioned cases to suspend the proceedings. 
Treba je upoštevati, da v nobenem od zgoraj navedenih primerov ni treba začasno ustaviti postopka.
The Office will decide whether suspension is appropriate under the circumstances of each case. 
Urad se bo na podlagi okoliščin posamezne zadeve odločil, ali je ustrezna začasna ustavitev postopka.
Therefore, the decision is at the Office's discretion. 
Odločitev zato Urad sprejme po svoji presoji.
Note that the proceedings may be suspended for a period of time longer than the one set out in Article 71(2) EUTMDR where the conditions indicated in Article 71(1)(a) or (b) EUTMDR are complied with. 
Treba je upoštevati, da se postopek lahko začasno ustavi za daljše obdobje, kot je določeno v členu 71(2) Delegirane uredbe, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 71(1)(a) ali (b) Delegirane uredbe.
6.3.2.1 Explanation of the basic principle, timing of suspension 
Pojasnilo osnovnega načela, trenutek začasne ustavitve
Article 71(1)(a) and (b) EUTMDR 
Člen 71(1)(a) in (b) Delegirane uredbe
In principle, oppositions based on (i) applications or (ii) earlier rights that are at risk are not to be suspended ex officio at the very beginning of the proceedings. 
Načeloma se postopki ugovorov, ki temeljijo na (i) prijavah ali (ii) prejšnjih pravicah, na začetku postopka ne bi smeli začasno ustaviti po uradni dolžnosti.
The assumption is that in most cases applications mature into registrations, and oppositions or cancellation actions against earlier rights might be solved during the proceedings. 
Domneva se, da prijave v večini primerov že med postopkom privedejo do registracije, ugovori v zvezi s prejšnjimi pravicami ali njihovi izbrisi pa se lahko rešijo med postopkom.
In these cases the opposition proceeds until a decision is ready to be taken. 
V teh primerih se ugovor nadaljuje, dokler ni pripravljena odločitev, ki bo sprejeta.
Consideration must then be given as to whether the earlier right in question could make a difference, in a prima facie opinion, to the outcome of the opposition. 
Zato je treba upoštevati, ali bi zadevna prejšnja pravica na prvi pogled lahko vplivala na izid ugovora.
If the opposition is deemed to be successful or rejected anyway, regardless of the fate of the earlier right at risk, the proceedings should not be suspended. 
Če se za ugovor šteje, da bo vsekakor uspešen ali zavrnjen, ne glede na usodo ogrožene prejšnje pravice, postopka ni treba začasno ustaviti.
If, in contrast, the earlier right at risk must necessarily be taken into account in the decision on the opposition, the proceedings will be suspended and, in the case of a national application or an earlier national mark at risk, the opponent must be requested to provide information on the status of the application or registration. 
Če pa je treba po drugi strani ogroženo prejšnjo pravico nujno upoštevati v odločbi o ugovoru, bo postopek začasno ustavljen, pri čemer je treba od vložnika ugovora v primeru nacionalne prijave ali ogrožene prejšnje pravice zahtevati, naj predloži informacije o statusu prijave ali registracije.
For earlier EUTMs, the Office has this information at its disposal. 
Urad ima na voljo te informacije za prejšnje blagovne znamke EU.
However, the Office may suspend the proceedings earlier if this is requested by one of the parties and the earlier right is an application or is at risk. 
Vendar lahko Urad začasno ustavi postopek pred tem, in sicer če to zahteva ena od strank oziroma če je prejšnja pravica prijava ali je ogrožena.
If the earlier right is a national one, the parties must submit evidence that it is facing problems. 
Če je prejšnja pravica nacionalna, morata stranki predložiti dokaze, da se v zvezi z njo pojavljajo težave.
In this case the outcome of the proceedings against the earlier mark must have some impact on the opposition. 
V takšnem primeru mora imeti izid postopka zoper prejšnjo znamko določen vpliv na ugovor.
Therefore, the probable outcome of the opposition will be considered in order to decide on suspension - in particular, whether the final decision on the opposition cannot be issued without taking into account the earlier application or earlier registration. 
Zato bo pri sprejemanju odločitve o začasni ustavitvi upoštevan verjetni izid ugovora, zlasti, ali končne odločbe o ugovoru ni mogoče izdati brez upoštevanja prejšnje prijave ali prejšnje registracije.