natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Visually and phonetically, the similarity of the signs at issue is not limited to the presence of the term ‘perfect' within each of those two signs, since those signs also have the same length and the same number of syllables, that are identically stressed, and an almost identical sequence of vowels; based on an overall impression, the similar elements between the signs referred to prevail globally over the dissimilar elements (paras 28, 32) . 
Vizualna in zvočna podobnost zadevnih znakov ni omejena na prisotnost izraza „perfect“ v vsakem od teh znakov, saj sta znaka tudi enako dolga in imata enako število zlogov, sta enako poudarjena in imata skoraj enako zaporedje samoglasnikov, na podlagi splošnega vtisa podobni elementi v znakih v celoti prevladajo nad različnimi elementi (točki 28 in 32).
The signs were found visually, phonetically and conceptually similar to an average degree (paras 32-33, 40). 
Ugotovljeno je, da znaka dosegata povprečno stopnjo vizualne, zvočne in pojmovne podobnosti (točke 32-33 in 40).
G&S: Classes 35, 37, 39, 40, 42 Territory: EU Assessment: The Court confirmed that the lack of distinctive character of the term ‘AQUA' has to be taken into account and that the specialised relevant public will not pay much attention to the descriptive element ‘AQUA', the only common element of the conflicting signs (paras 84-85). 
Blago in storitve: razredi 35, 37, 39, 40 in 42 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Sodišče je potrdilo, da je treba upoštevati pomanjkanje razlikovalnega značaja pojma „AQUA“ in da strokovna upoštevna javnost temu opisnemu elementu, ki je edini skupni element nasprotujočima si znakoma, ne bo namenjala veliko pozornosti (točki 84 in 85).
The figurative elements of the signs are totally different. 
Figurativni elementi znakov so povsem različni.
They are basic but not insignificant, so they must be taken into account in the overall impression of the signs (paras 54-55). 
So osnovni, vendar ne nepomembni, zato jih je treba upoštevati pri splošnem vtisu znakov (točki 54 in 55).
There is a low degree of visual similarity. 
Vizualna podobnost je šibka.
There is a low degree of phonetic and conceptual similarity, even though the different suffixes allow the specialised public to gather a different conceptual content (paras 71-73). 
Tudi zvočna in pojmovna podobnost sta šibki, tudi če različne pripone strokovni javnosti omogočajo, da dojame različno pojmovno vsebino (točke 71-73).
The differences between the signs are sufficient to exclude the likelihood of confusion, even for identical services and taking into account that the earlier trade mark, as a whole, has an enhanced distinctiveness (para. 86). 
Razlike med znakoma so dovolj velike, da se izključi verjetnost zmede, tudi v primeru enakih storitev, ob upoštevanju, da ima prejšnja blagovna znamka kot celota povečan razlikovalni učinek (točka 86).
G&S: Classes 36, 38 Territory: Bulgaria Assessment: The Court confirmed that the signs at issue are visually and phonetically highly similar, and conceptually identical, given that they coincide in their word elements, and despite the figurative nature of the signs at issue, the fonts used for the word elements do not make it possible to detect any particular difference between them (para. 28 in fine). 
Blago in storitve: razreda 36 in 38 Ozemlje: Bolgarija Presoja: Sodišče je potrdilo, da sta zadevna znaka vizualno in zvočno zelo podobna in pojmovno enaka, saj se ujemata v svojih besednih elementih; kljub figurativni naravi zadevnih znakov uporabljena pisava za besedne elemente ne omogoča, da bi se ugotovile kakršne koli posebne razlike med njimi (točka 28 na koncu).
G&S: Class 5 Territory: Austria Assessment: The Court found that although the element ‘BIO' is descriptive for the goods in question, the trade marks coincide not only in these three letters, but also in their fourth and fifth letters, ‘c' and ‘e' (para. 38). 
Blago in storitve: razred 5 Ozemlje: Avstrija Presoja: Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se blagovni znamki kljub temu, da je element „BIO“ opisen za zadevno blago, ne ujemata samo v teh treh črkah, temveč tudi v četrti in peti črki „c“ in „e“ (točka 38).
The difference in the last letters, ‘rt' versus ‘f', does not counteract the important similarity arising from the fact that the first five letters at the centre of the two signs, which are of very similar length, are identical (para. 39). 
Razlika med zadnjimi črkami „rt“ in „f“ ne prevlada nad pomembno podobnostjo, ki izhaja iz dejstva, da je prvih pet črk na sredini obeh znakov, ki so zelo podobne dolžine, enakih (točka 39).
There is an average degree of visual and phonetic similarity (paras 40, 46), whereas the conceptual comparison is neutral (para. 48) 
Obstaja povprečna stopnja vizualne in zvočne podobnosti (točki 40 in 46), pojmovna primerjava pa je nevtralna (točka 48).
MINI 23/01/2015, R 596/2014-4, confirmed 10/03/2016, T160/15, EU:T:2016:137 
MINI 23/01/2015, R 596/2014-4, potrjeno 10/03/2016, T160/15, EU:T:2016:137
G&S: Class 12 Territory: United Kingdom Assessment: The earlier trade mark is reputed for cars, and accordingly, it has enhanced distinctive character in the UK. 
Blago in storitve: razred 12 Ozemlje: Združeno kraljestvo Presoja: Prejšnja blagovna znamka ima ugled v zvezi z avtomobili, v skladu s tem pa povečan razlikovalni značaj v Združenem kraljestvu.
Thus, for the relevant public in the UK, the contested composite sign will be perceived as the widely-known trade mark ‘MINI' in combination with the descriptive word ‘CARGO'. 
Zato bo upoštevna javnost v Združenem kraljestvu izpodbijani sestavljeni znak zaznavala kot splošno znano blagovno znamko „MINI“ v kombinaciji z opisno besedo „CARGO“.
This is as a direct consequence of the earlier trade mark's repute in the field of motor vehicles (paras 19, 25-26). 
To je neposredna posledica ugleda prejšnje blagovne znamke na področju motornih vozil (točke 19, 25 in 26).
G&S: Class 25 Territory: Denmark, Finland, Sweden Assessment: ‘The element ‘by CAMPER' will be perceived as subsidiary, also due to the fact that the relevant public will perceive it as a mere indication of the undertaking producing the goods in question.' 
Blago in storitve: razred 25 Ozemlje: Danska, Finska in Švedska Presoja: Element „by CAMPER“ bo zaznan kot podrejen element, med drugim tudi zato, ker ga bo upoštevna javnost zaznala le kot navedbo podjetja, ki proizvaja zadevno blago.
Therefore, relevant consumers will focus their attention on the word ‘BROTHERS' and might attribute a common origin to the goods concerned (paras 65, 86) - likelihood of confusion. 
Zato bodo upoštevni potrošniki svojo pozornost osredotočili na besedo „BROTHERS“ in ji lahko pripisali skupni izvor zadevnega blaga (točki 65 in 86) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Classes 18, 25 Territory: Portugal Assessment: The two word marks at issue are identical, which increases the likelihood that consumers might perceive the goods marketed under those marks as coming from the same source. 
Blago in storitve: razreda 18 in 25 Ozemlje: Portugalska Presoja: Obe zadevni besedni znamki sta enaki, kar povečuje verjetnost, da bodo potrošniki blago, ki se trži pod tema znamkama, zaznavali, kot da izvira iz istega vira.
Moreover, the applicant has not shown that the Italian first name ‘Giordano' which makes up both trade marks is common in Portugal (para. 32) - likelihood of confusion. 
Poleg tega prijavitelj ni dokazal, da je italijansko ime „Giordano“, ki sestavlja obe blagovni znamki, običajno na Portugalskem (točka 32) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Classes 9, 42 Territory: Portugal Assessment: The Court considers that even if it is not certain that the relevant public throughout the European Union will necessarily perceive the signs at issue as being specifically diminutives of the name ‘Elizabeth', the relevant public will certainly regard them as highly similar female names derived from the same root. 
Blago in storitve: razreda 9 in 42 Ozemlje: Portugalska Presoja: Po mnenju Sodišča ni gotovo, da bo upoštevna javnost po Evropski uniji zadevna znaka nujno zaznala kot posebno pomanjševalnico imena „Elizabeth“, ju bo pa zagotovo štela za zelo podobni ženski imeni, ki izvirata iz istega korena.
In certain Member States, notably the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany and Austria, they will certainly be perceived by the relevant public as being diminutives of the full forename Elizabeth (para. 36) - likelihood of confusion. 
V nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti v Združenem kraljestvu, na Irskem, v Nemčiji in Avstriji, ju bo upoštevna javnost zagotovo zaznala kot pomanjševalnici imena Elizabeth (točka 36) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 25 Territory: EU Assessment: The marks compared are both variations of the female first name ‘Giselle' of old German and French origin and are overall very similar, so that a likelihood of confusion exists (paras 14, 15, 20) - likelihood of confusion. 
Blago in storitve: razred 25 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Primerjani znamki sta različici ženskega imena „Giselle“, ki izvira iz stare nemščine in francoščine, in sta si v celoti zelo podobni, tako da obstaja verjetnost zmede (točke 14, 15 in 20) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 3 Territory: Spain Assessment: In the Board's view, the average Spanish consumer who is familiar with the trade mark ‘LAURA' for perfumes will not be confused. 
Blago in storitve: razred 3 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Odbor meni, da pri povprečnem španskem potrošniku, ki pozna blagovno znamko parfumov „LAURA“, ni verjetnost zmede.
Conceptually, ‘LAURA' will be seen as a common first name in Spain. 
Konceptualno se „LAURA“ v Španiji zaznava kot običajno ime.
It is highly unlikely that the average Spanish consumer would consider linking the more specific name ‘LAURA MERCIER' with ‘LAURA' (para. 16) - no likelihood of confusion. 
Malo je verjetno, da bi povprečen španski potrošnik povezoval bolj določno ime „LAURA MERCIER“ z imenom „LAURA“ (točka 16) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
G&S: Classes 29, 30 Territory: Spain Assessment: The term ‘SMITH' in the trade mark application will be perceived by the Spanish consumers as a common Anglo-Saxon surname and will have less weight than the first name ‘AMANDA' (which is less common in Spain) (para. 31) - likelihood of confusion. 
Blago in storitve: razreda 29 in 30 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Izraz v prijavi blagovne znamke „SMITH“ bodo španski potrošniki zaznali kot običajni anglosaški priimek, ki bo imel manjši pomen kot ime „AMANDA“ (ki je v Španiji manj običajno) (točka 31) - verjetnost zmede.
ROSALIA ROSALIA DE CASTRO 05/10/2011, T421/10, EU:T:2011:565, (appeal 03/10/2012, C649/11 P, EU:C:2012:603, dismissed) 
ROSALIA ROSALIA DE CASTRO 05/10/2011, T421/10, EU:T:2011:565 (pritožba 03/10/2012, C649/11 P, EU:C:2012:603, zavrnjena)
G&S: Classes 32, 33, 35 Territory: Spain Assessment: The signs are visually and conceptually similar, and aurally very similar. 
Blago in storitve: razredi 32, 33 in 35 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Znaka sta vizualno in pojmovno podobna, zvočno pa zelo podobna.
The products are identical. 
Izdelki so enaki.
The services are similar. 
Storitve so podobne.
Neither the name ROSALIA nor the surname DE CASTRO is common in Spain. 
V Španiji niti ime ROSALIA niti priimek DE CASTRO nista običajna.
None of these elements has a higher distinctive character than the other (paras 5051) - likelihood of confusion. 
Nobeden od teh elementov nima večjega razlikovalnega značaja kot drugi (točki 50 in 51) - verjetnost zmede.
(Emidio Tucci fig.) 13/12/2004, T8/03, EU:T:2004:358, 03/10/2002, R 700/20004 & R 746/20004, confirmed 28/09/2006, C104/05 P, EU:C:2006:611 
(Emidio Tucci fig.) 13/12/2004, T8/03, EU:T:2004:358, 03/10/2002, R 700/20004 in R 746/20004, potrjeno z dne 28/09/2006, C104/05 P, EU:C:2006:611
G&S: Classes 3, 18, 24, 25 Territory: Spain Assessment: Both marks consist of the combination of a first name and a surname and give a similar overall impression - likelihood of confusion. 
Blago in storitve: razredi 3, 18, 24 in 25 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Obe znamki sta sestavljeni iz kombinacije imena in priimka ter ustvarjata podoben celoten vtis - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Classes 18, 25 Territory: Italy Assessment: Since it was contested that ‘Fusco' was not one of the most common surnames in Italy, the Court considered that, since the Italian consumer generally attributes greater distinctiveness to the surname than the forename, it will keep in mind the (neither rare nor common) surname ‘Fusco' rather than the (common) forenames ‘Antonio' or ‘Enzo'. 
Blago in storitve: razreda 18 in 25 Ozemlje: Italija Presoja: Zaradi izpodbijanja, da priimek „Fusco“ ni med najbolj običajnimi v Italiji, je Sodišče menilo, da si bo italijanski potrošnik, ker na splošno pripisuje večji razlikovalni učinek priimku kot imenu, namesto (običajnega) imena „Antonio“ ali „Enzo“ zapomnil priimek „Fusco“ (ki ni niti redek niti običajen).
Therefore, a consumer faced with goods bearing the trade mark applied for, ENZO FUSCO, might confuse it with the earlier trade mark, ANTONIO FUSCO, so that there is a likelihood of confusion (paras 53, 67) - likelihood of confusion. 
Zato bi lahko potrošnik, ko vidi blago s prijavljeno blagovno znamko ENZO FUSCO, to zamenjal s prejšnjo blagovno znamko ANTONIO FUSCO, tako da obstaja verjetnost zmede (točki 53 in 67) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Classes 18, 25 Territory: EU Assessment: Not only are consumers throughout the EU aware of the fact that people share the same surname without being necessarily related, but they will also be able to distinguish the Italian surname ‘ROSSI' bearing two different first names in the fashion field (paras 33-35) - no likelihood of confusion. 
Blago in storitve: razreda 18 in 25 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Potrošniki po vsej EU vedo, da ima veliko ljudi enak priimek, ne da bi bili nujno povezani, poleg tega bodo na področju mode sposobni razlikovati med italijanskim priimkom „ROSSI“, pred katerim stojita drugačni imeni (točke 33-35) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
G&S: Class 25 Territory: EU Assessment: Both of the marks at issue are made up of a first name and a surname. 
Blago in storitve: razred 25 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Obe zadevni znamki sta sestavljeni iz imena in priimka.
It is common ground that the element ‘storm' in the two marks at issue can be a surname. 
Ni sporno, da je lahko element „storm“ v obeh zadevnih znamkah priimek.
The elements ‘peer' and ‘peter' in the mark applied for and the earlier mark respectively are first names. 
Elementa „peer“ in „peter“ v znamki, za katero je vložena prijava, in prejšnji znamki, sta imeni.
In particular in the Nordic countries and in Germany, Peer is a first name. 
Peer je ime zlasti v skandinavskih državah in Nemčiji.
The fact that the mark applied for is written as one word cannot cast doubt on the finding that the two marks at issue are made up of a first name and a surname (para. 66) - likelihood of confusion. 
Dejstvo, da je znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, napisana z eno besedo, vzbuja dvom glede ugotovitve, da sta obe zadevni znamki sestavljeni iz imena in priimka (točka 66) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 33 Territory: Spain Assessment: It is common ground that the Spanish public will perceive the verbal element making up the trade mark applied for as a proper name (first name plus surnames) and the earlier trade mark as a surname. 
Blago in storitve: razred 33 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Ni sporno, da bo španska javnost besedni element, ki sestavlja prijavljeno blagovno znamko, zaznala kot lastno ime (ime in priimek), prejšnjo blagovno znamko pa kot priimek.
It is quite likely that the relevant public will regard the addition, in the trade mark applied for, of the first name ‘Julián' and the surname ‘Entrena' merely as a way of distinguishing a range of wines produced by the undertaking that owns the earlier trade mark or, at least, an undertaking economically linked to the intervener (paras 42, 78) - likelihood of confusion. 
Precej verjetno je, da bo upoštevna javnost dodatek imena „Julián“ in priimka „Entrena“ pri prijavljeni blagovni znamki štela le kot način razlikovanja izbora vin, ki jih izdeluje podjetje, ki je lastnik prejšnje blagovne znamke, ali vsaj podjetje, ki je s posrednikom gospodarsko povezano (točki 42 in 78) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 11 Territory: EU Assessment: The sign for which the EUTM applied for seeks protection consists of the term ‘Vera Bradley', which will most probably be seen as the name (forename and family name) of a person, fictitious or real. 
Blago in storitve: razred 11 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Znak, za katerega je vložena prijava za blagovno znamko EU in za katerega se zahteva varstvo, je sestavljen iz izraza „Vera Bradley“, ki se bo najverjetneje štel za ime (ime in priimek) osebe, ki je lahko izmišljena ali resnična.
It is composed of the first name ‘VERA', which is a common name for women in many EU countries such as, e.g. the Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Austria, Slovenia and the United Kingdom, and the surname ‘BRADLEY', which is an English family name. 
Sestavljeno je iz običajnega ženskega imena „VERA“ v številnih državah EU, npr. na Češkem, v Nemčiji, na Irskem in Nizozemskem, v Avstriji, Sloveniji in Združenem kraljestvu, in angleškega priimka „BRADLEY“.
The latter surname is not a common family name, neither in English-speaking countries nor in any other countries within the European Union. 
Ta priimek ni običajen niti v angleško govorečih državah niti v drugih državah Evropske unije.
Even if consumers might be able to distinguish between the signs due to the element ‘Vera', which has no counterpart in the earlier trade mark, they will see a specific line of products or an extended form of the mark. 
Čeprav bi bili potrošniki lahko sposobni razlikovati med znakoma zaradi elementa „Vera“, ki ga v prejšnji blagovni znamki ni, bodo izpodbijani znak razumeli kot posebno linijo izdelkov ali razširjeno obliko znamke.
Consequently, consumers might believe that the trade marks belong to the same undertakings or economically linked undertakings (paras 36-37, 52) -likelihood of confusion. 
Zato je verjetno, da bodo potrošniki mislili, da blagovni znamki pripadata istemu podjetju ali gospodarsko povezanim podjetjem (točke 36, 37 in 52) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 8 Territory: EU Assessment: In the case at hand, the colour combinations, identified by different colour codes, are not sufficiently close to lead to a likelihood of confusion, taking into account that the inherent distinctiveness is limited (para. 18). 
Blago in storitve: razred 8 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: V obravnavanem primeru barvne kombinacije, določene z različnimi barvnimi lestvicami, niso dovolj podobne, da bi povzročile verjetnost zmede, ob upoštevanju, da je svojstveni razlikovalni učinek omejen (točka 18).
The BoA referred to CJEU judgments and public interest in ensuring that colours remain available to competitors (para. 19). 
Odbor za pritožbe se je pri zagotavljanju razpoložljivosti barv za tekmece skliceval na sodbe Sodišča Evropske unije in javni interes (točka 19).
The opponent did not prove enhanced distinctive character (para. 25) - no likelihood of confusion. 
Vložnik ugovora ni dokazal povečanega razlikovalnega značaja (točka 25) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part C, Opposition Page 20 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del C, Ugovor stran 1
Unauthorised Filing by Agents of the TM Proprietor 
Nepooblaščena vložitev, ki jo opravijo posredniki imetnika blagovne znamke
UNAUTHORISED FILING 
NEPOOBLAŠČENA VLOŽITEV,
BY AGENTS OF THE TM PROPRIETOR (ARTICLE 8(3) EUTMR) 
KI JO OPRAVIJO POSREDNIKI IMETNIKA BLAGOVNE ZNAMKE (ČLEN 8(3) UREDBE O BLAGOVNI ZNAMKI EU)
1 Preliminary Remarks 3 
1 Uvodne pripombe 3
1.1 Origin of Article 8(3) EUTMR 3 
1.1 Izvor člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU 3
1.2 Purpose of Article 8(3) EUTMR 4 
1.2 Namen člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU 4
2 Entitlement of the Opponent 4 
2 Upravičenost vložnika ugovora 4
3 Scope of Application 5 
3 Področje uporabe 5
3.1 Kinds of mark covered 5 
3.1 Vrste upoštevnih znamk 5
3.2 Origin of the earlier mark 6 
3.2 Izvor prejšnje znamke 6
4 Conditions of Application 7 
4 Pogoji za uporabo 7
4.1 Agent or representative relationship 7 
4.1 Posredniško ali zastopniško razmerje 7
4.1.1 Nature of the relationship 7 
4.1.1 Vrsta razmerja 7
4.1.2 Form of the agreement 10 
4.1.2 Oblika sporazuma 10
4.1.3 Territorial scope of the agreement 11 
4.1.3 Ozemeljski obseg sporazuma 11
4.1.4 Relevant points in time 11 
4.1.4 Upoštevni datumi 11
4.2 Application in the agent's name 13 
4.2 Prijava v imenu posrednika 13
4.3 Application without the proprietor's consent 14 
4.3 Prijava brez soglasja imetnika 14
4.4 Absence of justification on the part of the applicant 16 
4.4 Neobstoj utemeljitve prijavitelja 16
4.5 Applicability beyond identical signs - goods and services 18 
4.5 Uporaba, ki ni omejena na enake znake - blago in storitve 18
1 Preliminary Remarks 
Uvodne pripombe
According to Article 8(3) EUTMR, upon opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark, a trade mark will not be registered: 
V skladu s členom 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se ob ugovoru imetnika prejšnje blagovne znamke blagovna znamka ne registrira:
where an agent or representative of the proprietor of the trade mark applies for registration thereof in his own name without the proprietor's consent, unless the agent or representative justifies his action. 
če posrednik ali zastopnik imetnika blagovne znamke zahteva njeno registracijo v lastnem imenu brez imetnikovega soglasja, razen če posrednik ali zastopnik svoje ravnanje upraviči.
1.1 Origin of Article 8(3) EUTMR 
Izvor člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 8(3) EUTMR has its origin in Article 6septies of the Paris Convention (PC), which was introduced into the convention by the Revision Conference of Lisbon in 1958. 
Člen 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU izhaja iz člena 6septies Pariške konvencije, ki je bil v Konvencijo uveden na lizbonski revizijski konferenci leta 1958.
The protection it affords to trade mark proprietors consists of the right to prevent, cancel, or claim as their own unauthorised registrations of their marks by their agents or representatives, and to prohibit use thereof, where the agent or representative cannot justify its acts. 
Varstvo, ki ga zagotavlja imetnikom blagovnih znamk, vključuje pravico do preprečevanja, izbrisa ali prenosa nepooblaščenih registracij njihovih znamk, ki jih njihovi posredniki ali zastopniki opravijo na svoje ime, in pravico do prepovedi njihove uporabe, če posrednik ali zastopnik ne more upravičiti svojih dejanj.
Article 6septies PC reads as follows: 
Člen 6septies Pariške konvencije se glasi:
(1) If the agent or representative of the person who is the proprietor of the mark in one of the countries of the Union applies, without such proprietor's authorization, for the registration of the mark in his own name, in one or more countries of the Union, the proprietor shall be entitled to oppose the registration applied for, or demand its cancellation or, if the law of the country so allows, the assignment in his favour of the said registration, unless such agent or representative justifies his action. 
Če zahteva predstavnik ali zastopnik upravičenca do znamke v posamezni državi Unije registracijo zadevne znamke na svoje ime v eni ali več državah Unije, ne da bi ga upravičenec za to pooblastil, se lahko upravičenec upre zahtevni registraciji ali lahko zahteva črtanje znamke oziroma prenos te registracije na svoje ime, če zakon države to dovoljuje, kolikor predstavnik ali zastopnik ne opraviči svojih postopkov.
(2) The proprietor of the mark shall, subject to the provisions of paragraph (1), above, be entitled to oppose the use of his mark by his agent or representative if he has not authorized such use. 
Upravičenec do znamke ima pod pogoji iz zgornjega odstavka (1) pravico upreti se uporabi svoje znamke s strani svojega predstavnika ali zastopnika, če ni dal svojega pooblastila zanjo.
(3) Domestic legislation may provide an equitable time limit within which the proprietor of a mark must exercise the rights provided for in this Article. 
Nacionalne zakonodaje lahko določijo pravičen rok, v katerem mora upravičenec do znamke zahtevati svoje pravice iz tega člena.