natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court indicated that ‘the fact that, in that newspaper article, the names of the funds are composed of the term “halder”, to which a number in Roman numerals has been added, is not such as to call into question the conclusion on use of the mark, since, because of their brevity, their weak distinctive character and their ancillary position, those additions do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered' (para. 58). 
Sodišče je navedlo, da dejstvo, da so imena skladov v navedenem časopisnem članku sestavljena iz izraza halder, ki mu je dodana rimska številka, ne vzbuja dvomov glede ugotovitve o uporabi znamke, saj ti dodatki zaradi svoje kratkosti, šibkega razlikovalnega značaja in akcesornega položaja ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja znamke v obliki, v kateri je bila registrirana“ (točka 58).
09/07/2013, R 1190/20114, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI; confirmed 30/06/2015, T489/13, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI 
09/07/2013, R 1190/20114, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI; potrjena 30/06/2015, T489/13, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI
The figurative signs reproduced in the evidence of use contain the distinctive elements of the earlier mark and those elements are clearly visible on the labels. 
Figurativni znaki, prikazani v dokazih o uporabi, vsebujejo razlikovalne elemente prejšnje znamke, ki so jasno vidni na etiketah.
The inversion of the figurative and word elements of the sign and the additional indication of the respective appellation of origin (Soave, Soave Superiore and Chianti) do not alter the distinctive character of the earlier mark, which appears reproduced in the sign with all its distinctive elements. 
Zamenjava položaja figurativnega in besednega elementa znaka in dodatna navedba zadevne označbe porekla (Soave, Soave Superiore in Chianti) ne spreminjata razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje znamke, saj se zdi, da znak vsebuje vse njene razlikovalne elemente.
Consumers of wines are particularly interested in knowing the precise geographical origin of these products; however, the addition of this information about the geographical origin of the goods is not capable of altering the distinctive character of a trade mark in its essential function of identifying a particular commercial origin (08/12/2005, T29/04, Cristal Castellblanch, EU:T:2005:438, § 19). 
Potrošniki vin želijo še zlasti poznati natančno geografsko poreklo teh proizvodov; vendar dodatek teh informacij o geografskem poreklu blaga ne more spremeniti razlikovalnega značaja blagovne znamke v zvezi z njeno bistveno funkcijo, ki je označevanje določenega trgovskega izvora (08/12/2005, T29/04, Cristal Castellblanch, EU:T:2005:438, § 19).
The Court stated that the term ‘line', synonymous with the German word ‘Linie', is commonly used in advertising and business in relation to a product line. 
Sodišče je navedlo, da se angleški izraz „line“ (linija), katerega ustreznik v nemščini je „Linie“, v oglaševanju in trgovanju pogosto uporablja v zvezi z linijo proizvodov.
It is likely to be perceived automatically as an additional element by the average consumer, particularly in Germany. 
Verjetno je, da ga bo povprečni potrošnik samodejno dojemal kot dodatni element, zlasti v Nemčiji.
The Court agreed with the Board of Appeal that the term ‘line' did not alter the distinctive character of the disputed mark and that use of this trade mark in combination with this term was a use of that mark (paras 26-27). 
Sodišče se je strinjalo z odborom za pritožbe, da izraz „line“ ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja izpodbijane znamke in da je uporaba te blagovne znamke skupaj s tem izrazom pomenila uporabo navedene znamke (točki 26 in 27).
AINHOA AINHOA in combination with ‘BIO', ‘LUXE', ‘MINERAL PASSION', ‘SPA WORLD CHOCOLATE' or 23/09/2015, T426/13, EU:T:2015:669 
AINHOA AINHOA v kombinaciji z „BIO“, „LUXE“, „MINERAL PASSION“, „SPA WORLD CHOCOLATE“ ali 23/09/2015, T426/13, EU:T:2015:669
The figurative element consists of a square representing the sky, with clouds concentrated in the lower part of the square. 
Figurativni element je sestavljen iz kvadrata, ki ponazarja nebo, z oblaki, ki so skoncentrirani v spodnjem delu kvadrata.
The use of the figurative element must be regarded as an acceptable variation of the contested mark. 
Uporabo figurativnega elementa je treba šteti za sprejemljivo različico izpodbijane znamke.
Furthermore, the elements added, such as, ‘bio', ‘luxe', ‘mineral passion' or ‘spa world chocolate', are descriptive of the characteristics of the goods. 
Poleg tega dodani elementi, kot so „bio“, „luxe“, „mineral passion“ ali „spa world chocolate“, opisujejo značilnosti blaga.
The element ‘bio' may easily be perceived as an abbreviation of the term ‘biological' and refers to the origin or composition of the goods concerned. 
Element „bio“, ki bi se lahko zlahka dojemal za okrajšavo izraza biološki, se nanaša na izvor ali sestavo zadevnega blaga.
The term ‘mineral' describes the components of the goods in question as minerals are commonly used in cosmetics. 
Izraz „mineral“ opisuje sestavine zadevnega blaga, saj se minerali pogosto uporabljajo v kozmetiki.
In addition, the word ‘spa' has a particular meaning with regard to health and wellness establishments. 
Poleg tega ima beseda „spa“ poseben pomen v zvezi z obrati za zdravje in dobro počutje.
Finally, the word ‘luxe' is intended to describe the range of goods in question. 
Nazadnje, z besedo „luxe“ naj bi se opisovala vrsta zadevnega blaga.
Consequently, such additional elements do not alter the distinctive character of the mark (paras 30-32). 
Zato takšni dodatni elementi ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja znamke (točke od 30 do 32).
The use of the earlier mark ‘PELASPAN-PAC' without the hyphen connecting the elements ‘PELASPAN' and ‘PAC' does not alter the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered and therefore counts for the genuine use assessment. 
Uporaba prejšnje znamke „PELASPAN-PAC“ brez vezaja, ki povezuje elementa „PELASPAN“ in „PAC“, ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje znamke, kot je registrirana, in jo je zato treba upoštevati pri presoji resne in dejanske uporabe.
‘In the case in hand, and after an examination of the proof submitted, which focuses essentially on the Spanish market, the Board is of the opinion that use of the “TENTATION” registered trade mark through use of the “TENTATIONS” sign does not alter the distinctive character of the original registered trade mark. 
Odbor za pritožbe v zadevnem primeru in po proučitvi predloženih dokazov, ki so v bistvu osredotočeni na španski trg, meni, da uporaba registrirane blagovne znamke TENTATION prek uporabe znaka TENTATIONS ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja prvotne registrirane blagovne znamke.
Specifically, the mere addition of the letter “S” to the end of the trade mark does not substantially alter the visual appearance or pronunciation of the registered trade mark and does not create a different conceptual impression on the Spanish market either. 
Podrobneje, le dodana črka S na koncu blagovne znamke ne spreminja bistveno videza ali izgovarjave registrirane blagovne znamke in ne ustvarja drugačnega pojmovnega vtisa na španskem trgu.
The trade mark in question will be perceived merely as being in its plural form as opposed to its singular form. 
Zadevna blagovna znamka se bo dojemala le kot množinska oblika namesto edninske.
Therefore, said change does not alter the distinctive character of the sign' (para. 17). 
Zato ta sprememba ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja znaka (točka 17).
The form used contained the logo plus the words ‘SOCIEDAD LIMITADA' (in small letters) underneath the term ‘SISTEMAS' and/or the ‘E' device with the words ‘epco SISTEMAS, S.L.' in bold 19/01/2009 R 1088/20082, EPCOS (fig.) / E epco SISTEMAS (fig.); confirmed 15/12/2010, T132/09, Epcos 
Uporabljena oblika je zajemala logotip in besedi „SOCIEDAD LIMITADA“ (z malimi črkami) pod izrazom „SISTEMAS“ in/ali figurativnim elementom „E“ z besedami „epco SISTEMAS, S.L.“ v krepkem tisku 19/01/2009 R 1088/20082, EPCOS (fig.) / E epco SISTEMAS (fig.); potrjena 15/12/2010, T132/09, Epcos
‘… these signs are not, as the applicant seems to suggest, significant alterations of the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered' (para. 24). 
[…] ta znaka nista - kot se zdi, da trdi vložnik ugovora - pomembni spremembi razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje znamke, kot je bila registrirana (točka 24).
‘… whereas the German word “Feriendorf”, meaning “holiday village”, could be perceived as descriptive of the relevant [hotel] services, the same was not true for the word element “panno[n]ia”' (para. 30). 
[…] medtem ko bi bilo mogoče nemško besedo Feriendorf, ki pomeni letoviško naselje, dojemati, kot da opisuje ustrezne [hotelske] storitve, to ne velja za besedni element panno[n]ia (točka 30).
Consequently, the addition of the word ‘panno[n]ia' alters the distinctive character of the mark. 
Zato dodatek besede „panno[n]ia spremeni razlikovalni značaj znamke.
‘It cannot be considered … that the use of CAPTAIN BIRDS EYE constitutes use of the mark CAPTAIN in a form which does not alter the distinctive character of the mark as registered, since the two signs appear essentially different' (para. 20). 
Ni mogoče šteti, […] da uporaba izraza CAPTAIN BIRDS EYE pomeni uporabo znamke CAPTAIN v obliki, ki ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja znamke, kot je bila registrirana, saj se znaka na videz bistveno razlikujeta (točka 20).
The addition of the semi-circular graphical element does not change the overall impression of the sign (para. 49). 
Dodatek polkrožnega grafičnega elementa ne spreminja celotnega vtisa znaka (točka 49).
The figurative elements are only decorative or even negligible and do not alter the distinctive character of the mark (para. 43). 
Figurativni elementi so le okrasni ali celo zanemarljivi in ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja znamke (točka 43).
‘[T]his material shows that the respondent's products also contain other elements, in particular a Japanese character within a small circle, which is depicted either above or below the word “BIONSEN”' (para. 19). 
Iz tega gradiva je razvidno, da proizvodi tožene stranke zajemajo tudi druge elemente, zlasti japonsko pismenko v majhnem krogu, ki je prikazan nad besedo BIONSEN ali pod nj“ (točka 19).
‘However, in the present case, the combination of the stylised form of the word “BIONSEN” and the Japanese character, independently of whether it is above or under the word “BIONSEN”, constitutes at the most use which differs from the form in which it was registered only in negligible elements. 
Vendar v tem primeru kombinacija stilizirane oblike besede BIONSEN in japonske pismenke, ne glede na to, ali prikazana nad besedo BIONSEN ali pod njo, pomeni kvečjemu uporabo, ki se od oblike, v kateri je bila registrirana, razlikuje le v zanemarljivih elementih.
The word “BIONSEN” as used is merely a slight and banal stylisation of the word ‘BIONSEN'. 
Beseda BIONSEN, kot se uporablja, je le neznatna in vsakdanja stilizacija besede BIONSEN.
As to the addition of the figurative element in the form of a circular element with a Japanese character, this will hardly be noticed by the average consumer due to its relatively small size and position, either under or on the right side above the word “BIONSEN”' (para. 23). 
V zvezi z dodanim figurativnim elementom v obliki okroglega elementa z japonsko pismenko se šteje, da ga bo povprečni potrošnik komaj opazil zaradi njegove razmeroma majhne velikosti in položaja bodisi pod besedo BIONSEN bodisi na desni strani nad njo (točka 23).
The General Court considered that both the registered form of the earlier mark and the form used included the word ‘BUS' and the figurative element of ‘three interlaced triangles'. 
Splošno sodišče je menilo, da sta registrirana oblika prejšnje znamke in uporabljena oblika vsebovali besedni element „BUS“ in figurativni element treh prepletenih trikotnikov.
The presentation of the elements is not particularly original or unusual in either form. 
Prikaz elementov v nobeni od oblik ni posebej izviren ali neobičajen.
The variation in them does not affect the distinctive character of the trade mark. 
Njuna sprememba ne vpliva na razlikovalni značaj blagovne znamke.
As regards the omission of ‘Betreuungsverbund für Unternehmer und Selbständige e. 
Kar zadeva opustitev izraza „Betreuungsverbund für Unternehmer und Selbständige e.
V.', the latter was ‘a string of words, written in small characters and occupying a secondary position, at the bottom of the sign. 
V.“, je bil to dolg besedni element, napisan z majhnimi črkami, ki ima drugoten položaj ob vznožju znaka.
Its meaning (Association for the assistance of businessmen and the self-employed, registered association) refers to the services in question. 
Ta pomen (združenje za pomoč podjetnikom in samostojnim podjetnikom, prijavljeno združenje) se nanaša na zadevne storitve.
29/09/2011, T415/09, Fishbone, EU:T:2011:550; confirmed 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2013:484 
29/09/2011, T415/09, Fishbone, EU:T:2011:550; potrjena z dne 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2013:484
The Board considered that although in some pieces of evidence the earlier mark did not include the word ‘beachwear', this did not alter the distinctiveness of the earlier mark because it was plainly descriptive of the nature of the goods (t-shirts, beachwear). 
Odbor za pritožbe je menil, da čeprav v nekaterih dokazih prejšnja blagovna znamka ni vključevala besede „beachwear“, to ne spreminja razlikovalnega učinka prejšnje blagovne znamke, ker le opisuje naravo blaga (majice s kratkimi rokavi, oblačila za na plažo).
The General Court held: ‘In the present case, the earlier mark is a composite mark, representing a ship's wheel, that is to say, a sign with a rounded shape. 
Splošno sodišče je menilo: V tem primeru je prejšnja blagovna znamka sestavljena znamka, ki ponazarja ladijsko krmilo, to je okrogel znak.
In the centre of the sign there is a fish skeleton, at the top of which is written the term “fishbone”, and at the bottom the term “beachwear”. 
V sredini znaka je ribje okostje, nad njim je napisan izraz fishbone, pod njim pa izraz beachwear.
… although the use of the earlier mark varies in certain items of evidence and is used in a form different from that under which it was registered, in the sense that the sign does not include the term “beachwear”, such a fact does not affect its distinctive character. 
[…] čeprav se uporaba prejšnje blagovne znamke razlikuje v nekaterih dokaznih elementih in se uporablja v obliki, ki je drugačna od oblike, v kateri je bila registrirana - v smislu, da znak ne vključuje izraza beachwear -, to ne vpliva na njen razlikovalni značaj.
The term “beachwear”, which means “beach clothing” in English, is descriptive of the nature of the goods covered by the earlier mark [emphasis added]. 
Izraz beachwear, ki v angleškem jeziku pomeni oblačila za na plažo, opisuje naravo blaga, ki ga označuje prejšnja znamka [dodan poudarek].
That descriptive character is obvious in the case of the “beach clothing” covered by the earlier mark, but also in the case of “t-shirts”, for which the term “beachwear” will immediately be perceived as meaning that it refers to a t-shirt to be worn in casual situations, for example, on the beach in summer. 
Navedeni opisni značaj je očiten v primeru oblačil za na plažo, označenih s prejšnjo znamko, vendar tudi v primeru majic s kratkimi rokavi, v zvezi s katerimi bo mogoče izraz beachwear takoj dojeti, kot da se nanaša na majico s kratkimi rokavi, ki se nosi ob vsakdanjih priložnostih, na primer poleti na plaži.
Consumers will thus understand that term as designating the type of goods and will not perceive it as an indication of their commercial origin. 
Potrošniki bodo tako izraz razumeli, kot da označuje vrsto blaga, in ga ne bodo dojemali kot označbo njegovega trgovskega izvora.
The fact that the term “beachwear” is written in a more fanciful font than that of the term “fishbone”, which is written in ordinary capital letters, cannot alter such an assessment. 
Dejstvo, da je izraz beachwear napisan v bolj nenavadni pisavi kot izraz fishbone, ki je napisan v navadnih velikih črkah, ne more spremeniti takšne presoje.
Furthermore, … the font of the term “beachwear” cannot be regarded as uncommon, since it comprises printed lower-case characters. 
Poleg tega pisave izraza beachwear ni mogoče šteti za nenavadno, ker je sestavljena iz malih tiskanih črk.
As for the horizontal position of the term “beachwear” in the earlier mark, which runs in a perpendicular sense across the bottom of a ship's wheel, it is no more graphically incisive than that of the term “fishbone” which, also written horizontally, follows the rounded shape of that wheel' (paras 6263). 
Kar zadeva vodoraven položaj izraza beachwear v prejšnji blagovni znamki, ki je pravokotno postavljen na spodnji del ladijskega krmila, ta ni nič bolj grafično vpadljiv od položaja izraza fishbone, ki je prav tako napisan vodoravno in sledi okrogli obliki krmila (točki 62 in 63).
It is not considered that the absence of the word ‘de' affects the distinctive character of the trade mark. 
Šteje se, da neuporaba besede „de“ ne vpliva na razlikovalni značaj blagovne znamke.
27/02/2014, T225/12, LIDL express, EU:T:2014:94, paras 4953; appealed 06/09/2016, C237/14 P, LIDL express (fig.) / LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al. 
27/02/2014, T225/12, LIDL express, EU:T:2014:94, paras 4953; pritožba 06/09/2016, C237/14 P, in drugi, C237/14 P
The Court confirmed (para. 53) the finding of the Board that the ‘distinctiveness of the mark is largely dominated by the wording ‘LIDL MUSIC' and only marginally influenced by the figurative elements used to represent the letters and the small monogram underneath' (21/03/2012, R 2379/20101, LIDL express (fig.)/LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al., para. 19). 
Sodišče je potrdilo (točka 53) ugotovitev odbora, da razlikovalni učinek znamke izhaja v glavnem iz besedila „LIDL MUSIC“ in da nanj le malo vplivajo figurativni elementi, uporabljeni za prikaz črk, in majhen monogram pod njimi“ (21/03/2012, R 2379/20101, LIDL express (fig.)/LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al., para. 19).
The omission of the transliteration of the term in Greek characters does not alter the distinctive character of the mark as the form used contains the term APALIA, which is distinctive and dominant. 
Opustitev prečrkovanja izraza z grškimi črkami ne spremeni razlikovalnega značaja znamke, saj oblika, ki se uporablja, vsebuje izraz APALIA, ki je razlikovalen in prevladujoč.
‘[T]he absence of the word element ‘TONY' in the first two marks significantly alters the distinctive character of the registered earlier mark ‘TONY HAWK'. 
Odsotnost besednega elementa TONY v prvih dveh znamkah bistveno spremeni razlikovalni značaj registrirane prejšnje znamke TONY HAWK.
Therefore, these marks shall be perceived as separate marks and their use cannot be considered as the use of the word mark ‘TONY HAWK'. 
Zato je treba ti znamki dojemati kot ločeni znamki, njune uporabe pa ni mogoče šteti za uporabo besedne znamke TONY HAWK“.
(in Spain) 03/02/2010, R 1625/20084 LT LIGHT-TECHNO / (FIGURATIVE); appeal 10/11/2011, T143/10, LT LighT-Thecno, EU:T:2011:652 did not refer to the Spanish trade marks) 
(v Španiji) 03/02/2010, R 1625/20084 LT LIGHT-TECHNO / (FIGURATIVE); pritožba 10/11/2011, T143/10, LT LighT-Thecno, EU:T:2011:652 (ni se nanašala na španske blagovne znamke)
‘The earlier trade mark is registered as “SP LA SPOSA”. 
Prejšnja blagovna znamka je registrirana kot SP LA SPOSA.
The documents submitted as proof of use refer only to female wedding dresses. 
Dokumenti, ki so bili predloženi kot dokaz o uporabi, se nanašajo le na ženske poročne obleke.
The element “LA SPOSA” is a common term, which will be understood by the Italian and Spanish public as “the bride” and has a weak distinctive character for the goods in issue, namely wedding dresses. 
Element LA SPOSA je običajen izraz, ki ga bosta italijanska in španska javnost razumeli, kot da pomeni nevesto, in ima šibek razlikovalni značaj za zadevno blago, in sicer poročne obleke.
The opponent itself, in its price list “tarifa de precios” which is drafted in various official languages of the EC, translated this term into the respective languages; underneath the term “LA SPOSA”, the terms “novia” are mentioned in the Portuguese version of the list, “bride” in the English version, “Braut” in the German version, and so on. 
Vložnik ugovora je v svojem ceniku izraz tarifa de precios, ki je bil oblikovan v različnih uradnih jezikih Evropske skupnosti, prevedel v zadevne jezike; pod izrazom LA SPOSA so navedeni izrazi novia v portugalski različici cenika, bride v angleški različici, Braut v nemški itd.
This shows that even the respondent itself understands the term “LA SPOSA” as a reference to the consumer targeted, namely the bride' (para. 18). 
To kaže, da tudi tožena stranka izraz LA SPOSA razume kot sklicevanje na ciljnega potrošnika, in sicer nevesto (točka 18).
‘Therefore the element “SP” at the beginning of the earlier mark is a distinctive element and cannot be disregarded. 
Zato je element SP na začetku prejšnje blagovne znamke razlikovalni element in ga je treba upoštevati.
This element cannot be neglected, first and foremost as it is placed at the beginning of the mark. 
Ni ga mogoče zanemariti, predvsem zato, ker je postavljen na začetek znamke.
Also, it is meaningless and distinctive on its own, in all the languages of the European Union' (para. 19). 
Poleg tega nima pomena in je sam po sebi razlikovalen v vseh jezikih Evropske unije“ (točka 19).
‘[T]he omission of the letter “SP” in the word “LA SPOSA” or “LA SPOSA COLLECTION” is not an acceptable variation of the earlier mark but a significant modification to the distinctive character of the mark. 
„Opustitev črk SP v izrazu LA SPOSA ali LA SPOSA COLLECTION ni sprejemljiva različica prejšnje znamke, temveč bistvena sprememba razlikovalnega značaja znamke.
The documents submitted by the respondent are insufficient to prove that the mark “SP LA SPOSA” has been put to genuine use' (para. 26). 
Dokumenti, ki jih je predložila tožena stranka, ne zadostujejo za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znamke SP LA SPOSA (točka 26).
In this case the Court examined whether the omission, in the form as used, of the expression ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor' alters the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered. 
Sodišče je v tej zadevi proučilo, ali je opustitev izraza „La Sabiduría del Sabor“ v obliki, ki se uporablja, spreminja razlikovalni značaj prejšnje znamke, kot je bila registrirana.
Firstly, the words 'Sabores de Navarra' (tastes/flavours of Navarra) refer to sensations or impressions evoking a region of northern Spain. 
Najprej, besede „Sabores de Navarra“ (okusi Navarre) se nanašajo na občutke ali vtise, ki v spomin prikličejo pokrajino v severni Španiji.
Thus, the elements can be perceived by the Spanish-speaking public as descriptive of the geographical origin of the goods in question. 
Zato lahko špansko govoreča javnost te elemente dojema, kot da opisujejo geografsko poreklo zadevnega blaga.
Moreover, the word ‘sabores' (favours) may be perceived as an indication of product quality, i.e. flavour. 
Poleg tega bi se lahko beseda „sabores“ (okusi) dojemala kot označba kakovosti proizvodov, tj. okusa.
It follows that the elements ‘Sabores de Navarra' must be regarded as essentially descriptive. 
Iz tega sledi, da je treba v zvezi z elementi „Sabores de Navarra“ šteti, da so v bistvu opisni.
The elements ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor', given the meaning of the word ‘La Sabiduría' (wisdom) and the word ‘sabor' (flavour), constitutes a play of words and cannot be considered descriptive. 
Elementi „La Sabiduría del Sabor“ glede na pomen izraza „La Sabiduría“ (modrost) in besede „sabor“ (okus) pomenijo besedno igro in jih ni mogoče šteti za opisne.
It follows that the distinctiveness of the earlier mark comes essentially from the words ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor'. 
Iz tega sledi, da razlikovalni učinek prejšnje znamke dejansko izhaja iz besed „La Sabiduría del Sabor“.