natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, this finding depends, first, on whether the coincidence is recognisable or rather remains unnoticed in the overall impression of both marks (paragraph 3.4.5.1 below), and furthermore, on the distinctiveness and dominant character of the common elements (paragraph 3.4.5.2 below), and also the impact of the remaining elements in the overall impression of the marks (paragraph 3.4.5.3 below). 
Vendar je ta ugotovitev odvisna od tega, ali je to ujemanje prepoznavno ali v celotnem vtisu obeh znamk ostane neopaženo (odstavek 3.4.5.1 v nadaljevanju), od razlikovalnega in prevladujočega učinka skupnih elementov (odstavek 3.4.5.2 v nadaljevanju) ter od vpliva, ki ga imajo ostali elementi na celotni vtis znamk (odstavek 3.4.5.3 v nadaljevanju).
3.4.5.1 Identifiable common element/coincidence 
Prepoznavnost skupnega elementa/ujemanja
Two marks are similar when, from the point of view of the relevant public, they are at least partly identical as regards one or more relevant aspects (23/10/2002, T6/01, Matratzen + Matratzenmarkt Concord (fig.), EU:T:2002:261, § 30). 
Znamki sta podobni, kadar sta z vidika upoštevne javnosti vsaj delno enaki v zvezi z enim ali več zadevnimi vidiki (23/10/2002, T6/01, Matratzen + Matratzenmarkt Concord (fig.), EU:T:2002:261, § 30).
The coincidence must be, therefore, ‘relevant' from the perspective of the consumer who usually perceives a mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyse its various details (13/02/2008, T146/06, Aturion, EU:T:2008:33, § 58). 
Ujemanje mora torej biti „pomembno“ z vidika potrošnika, ki običajno znamko zaznava kot celoto in ne analizira posameznih podrobnosti (13/02/2008, T146/06, Aturion, EU:T:2008:33, § 58).
The coincidence is clearly perceived when the commonality forms an independent word element or when it is separated in the way of writing (use of a special character, hyphen or other punctuation mark). 
Potrošnik jasno zazna ujemanje, kadar je skupna točka samostojen besedni element ali je ločena z načinom zapisa (uporabo posebnega znaka, vezaja ali drugega ločila).
As regards word marks, it should be recalled that they should not be dissected visually based on the alternation of upper and lower case letters, since in the case of word marks the use of mixed cases is irrelevant. 
Pri besednih znamkah je treba upoštevati, da jih ne bi smeli vizualno razčlenjevati na podlagi izmenjevanja velikih in malih črk, saj v primeru besednih znamk izmenjevanje velikih in malih črk ni pomembno.
Sometimes the graphical representation allows the separation of different elements of the mark and identification. 
Včasih grafični prikaz omogoča ločitev in prepoznavo različnih elementov znamke.
Furthermore, the common word can be identified as such in an isolated manner because of its clear meaning. 
Poleg tega lahko javnost prepozna skupno besedo kot skupno, če ima jasen pomen.
An average consumer perceiving a word sign will break it down into elements that suggest a concrete meaning or resemble known words (06/10/2004, T356/02, Vitakraft, EU:T:2004:292, § 51; confirmed 01/12/2005, C512/04 P, Vitakraft, EU:C:2005:736). 
Povprečni potrošnik bi, ko bi videl besedni znak, tega razstavil na besedne elemente, ki mu vzbujajo asociacijo na konkretni pomen ali so podobni besedam, ki jih pozna (06/10/2004, T356/02, Vitakraft, EU:T:2004:292, § 51; potrjena 01/12/2005, C512/04 P, Vitakraft, EU:C:2005:736)).
In the following examples, the common element is a part of a word, but could be identified since the public will logically split the word according to the meaning of its elements. 
V primerih v nadaljevanju je skupni element del besede, a ga je mogoče prepoznati, ker bo javnost besedo logično razstavila glede na pomen njenih elementov.
On the contrary, if it remains unnoticed, the mere coincidence in a string of letters is not enough for a finding of similarity. 
Če pa ujemanje v zaporedju črk ostane neopaženo, to ujemanje še ni dovolj za ugotovitev podobnosti.
The rule remains that the public compares the marks as a whole and will not artificially dissect them. 
Še vedno velja pravilo, da javnost primerja znamki kot celoti in ju ne razčlenjuje umetno.
In the following cases the similarity of the marks was denied despite an overlap in some letters (see also paragraph 4 below, especially paragraph 4.2.4). 
V naslednji zadevi podobnost znamk ni bila ugotovljena, čeprav se prekriva nekaj njunih črk (glej tudi odstavek 4 v nadaljevanju, zlasti odstavek 4.2.4).
3.4.5.2 Distinctiveness and dominant character of the common elements 
Razlikovalni in prevladujoči učinek skupnih elementov
For the conclusion of similarity, the degree of distinctiveness of the common element (or elements) must be taken into account. 
Za ugotovitev podobnosti je treba upoštevati stopnjo razlikovalnega učinka skupnega elementa (ali elementov).
The more distinctive the common element is, the higher the degree of similarity in each aspect of the comparison (visual, phonetic and conceptual). 
Bolj ko je skupni element razlikovalen, višja je stopnja podobnosti pri vsakem vidiku primerjave (vizualnem, zvočnem in pojmovnem).
A finding that the common element has a limited distinctiveness will lower the similarity, with the consequence that if the only common element of both marks is non-distinctive, the degree of similarity at all levels of comparison will be low or that even - depending on the impact of the elements that differentiate the marks - the similarity will be entirely denied (see paragraph 4.2.5 below). 
Če se ugotovi, da ima skupni element omejen razlikovalni učinek, se podobnost zniža, kar pomeni, da je, če je edini skupni element obeh znamk nerazlikovalen, stopnja podobnosti na vseh ravneh primerjave nizka, ali pa se podobnost celo povsem zavrne, odvisno od vpliva elementov, v katerih se znamki razlikujeta (glej odstavek 4.2.5 v nadaljevanju).
In the following examples, the common element was considered descriptive or otherwise non-distinctive, with the consequence that the level of similarity was considered low. 
V naslednjih primerih se je skupni element štel kot opisen ali drugače nerazlikovalen, zaradi česar je bila ugotovljena stopnja podobnosti nizka.
The fact that the coinciding element is a non-distinctive element, does not however, suffice to deny any similarity between the marks, unless there are further factors differentiating them (see paragraph 4.2.5 below). 
Dejstvo, da je element, ki se ujema, nerazlikovalen, še ne pomeni, da se zavrne vsakršna podobnost med znamkama, razen če se znamki razlikujeta tudi v drugih dejavnikih (glej odstavek 4.2.5 v nadaljevanju).
If the public will notice the overlap, it must be taken into account in the comparison. 
Če bo javnost opazila prekrivanje, ga je treba upoštevati pri primerjavi.
The fact that an element is descriptive or otherwise non-distinctive is not on its own sufficient to conclude that that word is negligible in the overall impression produced by that mark (08/02/2011, T194/09, Líneas aéreas del Mediterráneo, EU:T:2011:34, § 30). 
Dejstvo, da je element opisen ali drugače nerazlikovalen, samo po sebi še ne zadošča za ugotovitev, da je pri celotnem vtisu, ki ga znamka ustvarja, ta beseda zanemarljiva (08/02/2011, T194/09, Líneas aéreas del Mediterráneo, EU:T:2011:34, § 30).
(For the impact of common weak or non-distinctive components on likelihood of confusion see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 7, Global Assessment). 
(Za vpliv skupnih šibkih ali nerazlikovalnih sestavnih delov na verjetnost zmede glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 7: Celovita presoja.)
The conclusion on visual similarity also has to take into account whether the common element is dominant (visually outstanding) or at least codominant in the overall impression of the marks. 
Pri ugotovitvi glede vizualne podobnosti je treba upoštevati tudi, ali je skupni element v okviru celotnega vtisa znamk prevladujoč (vidno izstopajoč) ali vsaj soprevladujoč.
As explained previously (see paragraph 3.3 above), within the assessment of the dominant character of one or more components, the intrinsic qualities (size, striking graphical representation, etc.) of each of those components have to be compared with the intrinsic qualities of the other components. 
Kot je že pojasnjeno v odstavku 3.3 zgoraj, je treba v okviru presoje prevladujočega učinka enega ali več sestavnih delov značilnosti, lastne posameznemu sestavnemu delu (velikost, izstopajoč grafični prikaz itd.), primerjati z značilnostmi, lastnimi drugim sestavnim delom.
In addition and accessorily, account may be taken of the relative position of the various components within the arrangement of the composite mark (23/09/2014, T341/13, So'bio etic (fig.) / SO…? et al., EU:T:2014:802, § 67). 
Poleg tega se lahko upošteva relativni položaj posameznih sestavnih delov v postavitvi sestavljene znamke (23/09/2014, T341/13, So'bio etic (fig.) / SO…? et al., EU:T:2014:802, § 67).
The distinctiveness and dominant character of the common element(s) are separate but related terms. 
Razlikovalni in prevladujoči učinek skupnega elementa ali elementov sta ločena, a sorodna pojma.
According to the Court: 
Kot trdi Sodišče:
It should also be noted that where some elements of a trade mark are descriptive or non-distinctive, they are not generally regarded by the public as being dominant in the overall impression conveyed by that mark, unless, particularly because of their position or their size, they appear likely to make an impression on consumers and to be remembered by them. 
Treba je omeniti tudi, da kadar so nekateri elementi blagovne znamke opisni ali nerazlikovalni, teh javnost običajno ne šteje kot prevladujočih v celotnem vtisu, ki ga ustvarja ta znamka, razen če so, zlasti zaradi svojega položaja ali velikosti, videti tako, da bi verjetno naredili vtis na potrošnike in bi si jih ti zapomnili
(31/01/2013, T54/12, Sport, EU:T:2013:50, § 24 and the case-law cited). 
(31/01/2013, T54/12, Sport, EU:T:2013:50, § 24 in navedena sodna praksa).
3.4.5.3 Importance of additional (not common) elements 
Pomen dodatnih elementov (ki niso skupni)
Within the comparison of trade marks as a whole, the impact of the non-common elements in their overall impression also has to be taken into account in order to reach a conclusion on similarity. 
V okviru primerjave blagovnih znamk kot celote je treba upoštevati tudi vpliv elementov, ki niso skupni, na njihov celotni vtis, da se lahko oblikuje ugotovitev glede podobnosti.
The more differences the remaining elements of the marks present, the lower would be the similarity resulting from the common element. 
Več razlik ko ponazarjajo preostali elementi znamke, nižja je stopnja podobnosti, ki izhaja iz skupnega elementa.
It cannot be generally assumed that the elements of difference between the marks would tend to become less marked in the consumer's memory in favour of the elements of similarity. 
Ni mogoče splošno domnevati, da bi se elementi, ki se med znamkama razlikujejo, potrošniku manj vtisnili v spomin kot podobni elementi.
In accordance with settled case-law, the extent of the similarity or difference between the signs at issue may depend, in particular, on the inherent qualities of the signs (13/05/2015, T169/14, Koragel / CHORAGON, EU:T:2015:280, § 84). 
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso je lahko stopnja podobnosti ali različnosti med zadevnima znakoma odvisna zlasti od notranjih značilnosti znakov (13/05/2015, T169/14, Koragel / CHORAGON, EU:T:2015:280, § 84).
The distinctiveness and dominant character of the differentiating elements has to be, therefore, taken into account. 
Treba je torej upoštevati razlikovalni in prevladujoči učinek elementov, ki se razlikujejo.
If these elements are the distinctive ones and dominate the overall impression of the marks, the level of similarity will decrease. 
Če so ti elementi razlikovalni in v celotnem vtisu znamk prevladujejo, bo stopnja podobnosti nižja.
On the contrary, if the element in which the marks differ is of less inherent distinctiveness than the common element, this will increase the level of similarity. 
Nasprotno pa se bo, če ima element, v katerem se znamki razlikujeta, manjši svojstven razlikovalni učinek kot skupni element, stopnja podobnosti zvišala.
3.4.6 Other principles to be taken into account in the comparison of signs 
Druga načela, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri primerjavi znakov
3.4.6.1 Impact of word elements versus figurative elements on the visual and conceptual comparison 
Vpliv besednih elementov in vpliv figurativnih elementov na vizualno in pojmovno primerjavo
When signs consist of both verbal and figurative components, in principle, the verbal component of the sign usually has a stronger impact on the consumer than the figurative component. 
Če so znaki sestavljeni iz besednega in figurativnega elementa, ima besedni del navadno močnejši učinek na potrošnika kot figurativni del.
This is because the public does not tend to analyse signs and will more easily refer to the signs in question by their verbal element than by describing their figurative elements (14/07/2005, T312/03, Selenium-Ace, EU:T:2005:289, § 37; 19/12/2011, R 233/20114, BEST TONE (fig.) / BETSTONE, § 24; 13/12/2011, R 53/20115, JUMBO (fig.) / DEVICE OF AN ELEPHANT (fig.), § 59). 
Razlog za to je, da javnost običajno ne analizira znakov in se bo lažje sklicevala na zadevne znake z navajanjem besednega elementa kot z opisovanjem figurativnega elementa (14/07/2005, T312/03, Selenium-Ace, EU:T:2005:289, § 37; 19/12/2011, R 233/20114, BEST TONE (fig.) / BETSTONE, § 24; 13/12/2011, R 53/20115, JUMBO (fig.) / DEVICE OF AN ELEPHANT (fig.), § 59).
However, the verbal element of a sign does not automatically have a stronger impact (31/01/2013, T54/12, Sport, EU:T:2013:50, § 40) and in certain cases, the figurative element of a composite mark may, owing to, inter alia, its shape, size, colour or position within the sign, rank equally with the word element (23/11/2010, T35/08, Artesa Napa Valley, EU:T:2010:476, § 37). 
Vendar besedni element znaka nima samodejno večjega vpliva (31/01/2013, T54/12, Sport, EU:T:2013:50, § 40) in figurativni element sestavljene znamke ima lahko v nekaterih primerih, med drugim zaradi svoje oblike, velikosti, barve ali položaja v znaku, enakovredno mesto kot besedni (23/11/2010, T35/08, Artesa Napa Valley, EU:T:2010:476, § 37).
In addition, when the earlier mark is a word mark, the figurative elements of the contested sign may even play a decisive role in differentiating the signs (see the first example in the table below). 
Kadar je prejšnja znamka besedna znamka, imajo figurativni elementi izpodbijanega znaka lahko celo odločilno vlogo pri razlikovanju med znakoma (glej prvi primer v spodnji preglednici).
Moreover, in assessing the impact of the verbal element of a composite trade mark, account should be taken of the distinctiveness of this element. 
Poleg tega je treba pri presoji učinka besednega elementa v sestavljeni blagovni znamki upoštevati njegov razlikovalni učinek.
Signs with an identical or very similar verbal element and different figurative elements 
Znaki z enakim ali zelo podobnim besednim elementom in različnimi figurativnimi elementi
When the verbal elements are identical or similar and the figurative element has neither semantic meaning nor striking stylisation, the signs are usually similar. 
Kadar sta besedna elementa enaka ali podobna, figurativni element pa niti nima semantičnega pomena niti ni izstopajoče stiliziran, sta znaka običajno podobna.
In this scenario, the figurative element will be considered not to have a significant influence in the relevant public's perception of the sign. 
V tem primeru se bo štelo, da figurativni element ne vpliva pomembno na to, kako upoštevna javnost znak zazna.
In contrast, when the common verbal elements are likewise weak or even less distinctive than the figurative elements, the coincidence in the verbal elements leads to only low similarity, if there are differences in the figurative elements. 
Kadar pa sta skupna besedna elementa šibka ali še manj razlikovalna kot figurativna elementa, zaradi ujemanja besednih elementov obstaja le nizka stopnja podobnosti, če so razlike v figurativnih elementih.
Signs with an identical or very similar figurative element and different verbal elements 
Znaki z enakim ali zelo podobnim besednim elementom in različnimi figurativnimi elementi
In general, the identity or similarity of the figurative component of signs will not lead to a considerable level of similarity where at least one of the signs contains a further verbal component that is not contained in the other sign. 
Na splošno zaradi enakosti ali podobnosti figurativnega sestavnega dela znakov ne nastane precejšnja stopnja podobnosti, kadar vsaj eden od znakov vsebuje dodaten besedni sestavni del, ki ga v drugem znaku ni.
The outcome will however depend on the particular circumstances in each individual case. 
Vseeno bo izid odvisen od posebnih okoliščin posameznega primera.
This rule does not apply to the cases where the verbal element is of limited distinctiveness and not dominant. 
To pravilo ne velja, kadar ima besedni element omejen razlikovalni učinek in ni prevladujoč.
Signs with figurative elements corresponding to the meaning of the verbal elements 
Znaki s figurativnimi elementi, ki se ujemajo s pomenom besednih elementov
The figurative element may ‘cooperate' with the verbal part in defining a particular concept and may even help with the understanding of words that, in principle, might not be widely known to consumers. 
Figurativni element lahko „prispeva“ k besednemu delu z opredelitvijo posebnega pojma in lahko celo pomaga pri razumevanju besed, ki pri potrošnikih načeloma niso splošno znane.
This will strengthen the conceptual similarity. 
S tem se okrepi pojmovna podobnost.
3.4.6.2 Beginning of the signs in the visual and phonetic comparison 
Začetek znakov pri vizualni in zvočni primerjavi
In word signs or in signs containing a verbal element, the first part is generally the one that primarily catches the consumer's attention and, therefore, will be remembered more clearly than the rest of the sign. 
V besednih znakih in znakih, ki vsebujejo besedni element, je načeloma prvi del tisti, ki pritegne pozornost potrošnika, ter si ga bo zato bolj zapomnil kot preostali del znaka.
This means that in general the beginning of a sign has a significant influence on the general impression made by the mark (15/12/2009, T412/08, Trubion, EU:T:2009:507, § 40; 25/03/2009, T109/07, Spa Therapy, EU:T:2009:81, § 30). 
To pomeni, da ima običajno začetek znaka precejšnji vpliv na splošni vtis, ki ga ustvari znamka (15/12/2009, T412/08, Trubion, EU:T:2009:507, § 40; 25/03/2009, T109/07, Spa Therapy, EU:T:2009:81, § 30).
Nevertheless, the concept ‘beginning of the sign' is undetermined, as there is no particular indication of what forms the beginning, what is the end or even if there is or is not a middle part of the sign. 
Vendar pojem „začetek znaka“ ni določen, ker ni posebej navedeno, kaj je začetek in kaj konec znaka ter ali obstaja srednji del znaka ali ne.
Again, this perception mostly depends on the circumstances of the case (length of sign, syllabic distribution, use of typeface, etc.) and not on a set rule. 
Tudi v tem primeru je zaznavanje odvisno predvsem od okoliščin posameznega primera (dolžina znaka, delitev zlogov, uporaba tipografije), in ne od absolutnega pravila.
As it is usually the beginning of a sign that catches consumers' attention, where signs only differ in their endings, this difference is often insufficient to exclude similarity. 
Če se znaka razlikujeta le po končnicah, ta razlika pogosto ne zadošča za izključitev podobnosti, ker pozornost potrošnika navadno pritegne začetek znaka.
However, this is not a fixed rule and the outcome depends on the circumstances of the case. 
Vendar to pravilo ne velja vedno, saj je izid odvisen od okoliščin primera.
Moreover, this rule only applies when the sign contains a verbal element (which would explain reading from left to right) and when this verbal element is not very short (otherwise the sign will be perceived immediately in its entirety). 
Poleg tega se pravilo uporablja le, če znak vsebuje besedni element (kar bi pojasnilo branje od leve proti desni) in če ta ni zelo kratek (drugače se znak takoj zazna kot celota).
The Office considers signs consisting of three or fewer letters/numbers as very short signs (see in more detail paragraph 3.4.6.3 below). 
Urad znake s tremi črkami/števkami ali manj šteje kot zelo kratke znake (za več podrobnosti glej odstavek 3.4.6.3 v nadaljevanju).
In principle, coincidences at the beginning of signs increase their similarity more than in the middle or at the end. 
Načeloma se z ujemanjem na začetku znakov njuna podobnost poveča bolj kot z ujemanjem na sredini ali na koncu.
However, the degree of similarity will usually be lower, despite identical beginnings, if those are the weak elements in the signs or if the remaining elements have a clearly different meaning. 
Stopnja podobnosti bo kljub enakemu začetku običajno nižja, če sta na začetku šibka elementa ali če imajo preostali elementi jasno različen pomen.
3.4.6.3 Short signs 
Kratki znaki
The comparison of signs must be based on the overall impression given by the marks. 
Primerjava znakov mora temeljiti na celotnem vtisu, ki ga ustvarjata znamki.
The length of signs may influence the effect of the differences between them. 
Dolžina znakov lahko vpliva na učinek razlik med njimi.
In principle, the shorter a sign, the more easily the public is able to perceive all its single elements. 
Načeloma velja, da kolikor krajši je znak, lažje lahko javnost zazna vse njegove posamezne elemente.
In contrast, the public is usually less aware of differences between longer signs. 
Nasprotno pa javnost navadno slabše zazna razlike med daljšimi znaki.
However, each case must be judged on its own merits, having regard to all the relevant factors. 
Vendar je treba vsak primer presojati na podlagi njegovih značilnosti ob upoštevanju vseh upoštevnih dejavnikov.
The Courts have not defined exactly what a short sign is. 
Sodišča niso natančno opredelila, kaj je kratek znak.
However, signs with three or less than three letters/numbers are considered by the Office as short signs. 
Vendar Urad šteje, da je znak kratek, če je sestavljen iz največ treh črk/števk.
The paragraphs below thus analyse the impact on the overall impression, and thus, on the similarity of the respective signs for one-, two- and three-letter/number signs. 
V spodnjih odstavkih je analiziran vpliv na celotni vtis in s tem na podobnost znakov, in sicer za znake iz ene, dveh in treh črk ali števk.
The comparison between signs consisting of a single letter or a combination of three or less than three letters not recognisable as a word, follows the same rules as that for word signs comprising a word, a name or an invented term (06/10/2004, T117/03 T119/03 & T171/03, NL, EU:T:2004:293, § 47-48; 10/05/2011, T187/10, G, EU:T:2011:202, § 49). 
Za primerjavo znakov, sestavljenih iz ene same črke ali kombinacije treh črk ali manj, ki ni prepoznavna kot beseda, veljajo enaka pravila kot za besedne znake, ki obsegajo besedo, ime ali fantazijsko sestavino (06/10/2004, T117/03 T119/03 & T171/03, NL, EU:T:2004:293, § 47-48; 10/05/2011, T187/10, G, EU:T:2011:202, § 49).
Single-letter/Single-number signs 
Znaki iz ene same črke ali števke
It follows from the case-law of the Court that in the assessment of likelihood of confusion between signs comprising the same single letter, the visual comparison (see paragraph 3.4.1.6 above) is, in principle, decisive. 
Iz sodne prakse Sodišča izhaja, da je pri presoji verjetnosti zmede med znakoma, sestavljenima iz ene same iste črke, načeloma odločilna vizualna primerjava (glej odstavek 3.4.1.6 zgoraj).