natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Considering that the specific circumstances of individual Member States may not be widely known in EU territory, the objection letter should explain these circumstances clearly in order to make sure that the applicant is able to fully understand the reasoning behind the objection and is able to respond accordingly. 
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da posebne okoliščine posameznih držav članic na ozemlju EU morda niso splošno znane, je treba v obvestilu o ugovoru te okoliščine jasno pojasniti, da lahko prijavitelj v celoti razume razlog za ugovor in ustrezno odgovori.
2 ‘Public Policy' 
„Javni red“
2.1 Concept and categories 
Pojem in kategorije
This objection derives from an assessment based on objective criteria. 
Ta ugovor izhaja iz presoje na podlagi objektivnih meril.
‘Public policy' is the body of all legal rules that are necessary for the functioning of a democratic society and the state of law. 
„Javni red“ je korpus vseh pravnih pravil, ki so potrebna za delovanje demokratične družbe in pravne države.
In the context of Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR, ‘public policy' refers to the body of EU law applicable in a certain area, as well as to the legal order and the state of law as defined by the Treaties and secondary EU legislation, which reflect a common understanding of certain basic principles and values, such as human rights. 
V okviru člena 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se javni red nanaša na korpus prava EU, ki se uporablja na posebnem področju, ter pravni red in pravno državo, kot sta opredeljena v Pogodbah in sekundarni zakonodaji EU ter ki izražata skupno razumevanje nekaterih temeljnih načel in vrednot, kot so človekove pravice.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of examples of when signs will be caught by this prohibition: 
Naslednji neizčrpen seznam primerov ponazarja, kdaj se ta prepoved uporablja za znake:
Any EUTM applied for that can be deemed to support or benefit an individual or a group on the list will be rejected as being against public policy. 
Katera koli blagovna znamka EU, za katero je vložena prijava in v zvezi s katero je mogoče šteti, da podpira posameznika ali skupino z navedenega seznama oziroma mu/ji koristi, bo zavrnjena, ker je v nasprotju z javnim redom.
3 Accepted Principles of Morality 
Sprejeta moralna načela
This objection concerns subjective values, but these must be applied as objectively as possible by the examiner. 
Ta ugovor se nanaša na subjektivne vrednosti, ki jih mora preizkuševalec uporabljati čim objektivneje.
The provision excludes registration as European Union trade marks of blasphemous, racist, discriminatory or insulting words or phrases, but only if that meaning is clearly conveyed by the mark applied for in an unambiguous manner; the standard to be applied is that of the reasonable consumer with average sensitivity and tolerance thresholds (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye! 
Določba izključuje registracijo blagovnih znamk Evropske unije, ki vsebujejo bogokletne, rasistične, diskriminatorne ali žaljive besede ali izraze, vendar samo, če prijavljena blagovna znamka prenaša ta pomen jasno in nedvoumno; pri tem se kot standard uporabi razumen potrošnik s povprečnim pragom občutljivosti in tolerance (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye!
The concept of morality in Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR is not concerned with bad taste or the protection of individuals' feelings. 
Pojem morale v členu 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se ne nanaša na slab okus ali varstvo občutkov posameznikov.
In order to fall foul of Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR, a trade mark must be perceived by the relevant public, or at least a significant part of it, as going directly against the basic moral norms of society. 
Da bi bila znamka v nasprotju s členom 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, jo mora upoštevna javnost ali vsaj njen velik del zaznavati, kot da neposredno krši temeljna moralna načela družbe.
It is not sufficient if the trade mark is only likely to offend a small minority of exceptionally puritanical citizens. 
Ne zadostuje namreč, da bi bila blagovna znamka morda žaljiva samo za maloštevilno manjšino izredno moralističnih prebivalcev.
Conversely, a trade mark should not be allowed to be registered simply because it would not offend the equally small minority at the other end of the spectrum who find even gross obscenity acceptable. 
Nasprotno se registracija blagovne znamke ravno tako ne bi smela dovoliti samo zato, ker ne bi bila žaljiva za enako maloštevilno manjšino na drugi strani, za katero je sprejemljiva tudi prostaška opolzkost.
The trade mark must be assessed by reference to the standards and values of ordinary citizens who fall between those two extremes (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 21). 
Blagovno znamko je treba presojati s sklicevanjem na standarde in vrednote običajnih državljanov, ki so vmes med tema skrajnostma (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 21).
As stated under ‘General remarks' above, national legislation and practice of Member States are indicators to be taken into account in order to assess how certain categories of signs are perceived by the relevant public in those Member States (20/09/2011, T232/10, Coat of Arms of the Soviet Union, EU:T:2011:498, § 58). 
Kot je navedeno v splošnih pripombah zgoraj, sta nacionalna zakonodaja in praksa držav članic merili, ki ju je treba upoštevati pri presoji, kako upoštevna javnost v teh državah članicah zaznava zadevne kategorije znakov (20/09/2011, T232/10, Coat of Arms of the Soviet Union, EU:T:2011:498, § 58).
However, the Office must not object to trade marks because of the mere fact that they are in conflict with national legislation and practice. 
Vendar Urad ne sme blagovnim znamkam nasprotovati samo zato, ker so v nasprotju z nacionalno zakonodajo in prakso.
National legislation and practice are considered to be factual evidence that enables an assessment of the perception of the relevant public within the relevant territory. 
Nacionalna zakonodaja in praksa veljata za dejanski dokaz, ki omogoča presojo zaznavanja upoštevne javnosti na zadevnem ozemlju.
Examples of national legislation taken into account as evidence of a trade mark being contrary to accepted principles of morality: 
Primeri nacionalne zakonodaje, ki se upošteva kot dokaz, da je blagovna znamka v nasprotju s sprejetimi moralnimi načeli:
use of symbols and names of unconstitutional parties or organisations is prohibited in Germany (§ 86a dt. 
uporaba simbolov in imen protiustavnih strank ali organizacij je prepovedana v Nemčiji (§ 86a dt.
StGB (German Criminal Code), BGBl. 
StGB (nemški kazenski zakonik), BGBl. št.
No I 75/1998) and in Austria (§ 1 öst. 
I 75/1998) in v Avstriji (§ 1 öst.
Abzeichengesetz (Austrian Law on Insignias), BGBl. 
Abzeichengesetz (avstrijski zakon o oznakah), BGBl. št.
No 84/1960 in conjunction with § 1 öst. 
84/1960 v povezavi z § 1 öst.
Verbotsgesetz (Austrian Prohibition Law), BGBl. 
Verbotsgesetz (avstrijski zakon o prepovedi), BGBl. št.
‘use of symbols of totalitarianism' (e.g. the sickle and hammer and the five-pointed red star), specifically in a way to offend the dignity of victims of totalitarian regimes and their right to sanctity is prohibited in Hungary (Section 335 of Act C of 2012 on the Criminal Code) (20/09/2011, T232/10, Coat of Arms of the Soviet Union, EU:T:2011:498). 
„uporaba simbolov totalitarizma“ (npr. srpa in kladiva ter petorokrake rdeče zvezde), zlasti na način, ki je žaljiv za dostojanstvo žrtev totalitarnih režimov in njihovo pravico do svetosti življenja, je prepovedana na Madžarskem (oddelek 335 zakona C iz leta 2012 o kazenskem zakoniku) (20/09/2011, T232/10, Coat of Arms of the Soviet Union, EU:T:2011:498).
Raising an objection when a trade mark is contrary to accepted principles of morality does not exclude, however, that the sign can also be contrary to public policy (e.g. the trade mark may be perceived by the relevant public as directly against the basic moral norms of society and at the same time, may contradict the basic principles and fundamental values of the EU political and social order). 
Vložitev ugovora, kadar je blagovna znamka v nasprotju s sprejetimi moralnimi načeli, pa ne izključuje dejstva, da je znak lahko v nasprotju tudi z javnim redom (npr. upoštevna javnost lahko blagovno znamko zaznava kot znamko, ki je neposredno v nasprotju s temeljnimi moralnimi načeli družbe in ki lahko obenem nasprotuje temeljnim načelom in vrednotam političnega in družbenega reda EU).
The examination of Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR should consider the context in which the mark is likely to be encountered, assuming normal use of the mark in connection with the goods and services covered by the application (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 21). 
Pri proučitvi člena 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU bi bilo treba upoštevati okvir, v katerem se bo znamka verjetno pojavila, ob predpostavki običajne uporabe znamke v povezavi z blagom in storitvami, ki jih prijava zajema (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 21).
Taking account of the goods and services for which registration of the mark is sought is normally necessary, since the relevant public may be different for different goods and services and, therefore, may have different thresholds with regard to what is clearly unacceptably offensive. 
Običajno je treba upoštevati blago in storitve, za katere se zahteva registracija znamke, saj je lahko upoštevna javnost različna za različno blago in storitve ter ima lahko zato različne prage glede tega, kaj je jasno in nesprejemljivo žaljivo.
For example, ‘a person who is sufficiently interested in [sex toys] to notice the trade marks under which they are sold is unlikely to be offended by a term with crude sexual connotations' (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 29). 
Na primer, ni verjetno, da bo izraz s prostaškimi spolnimi konotacijami žaljiv za osebo, ki se dovolj zanima za [spolne pripomočke], da opazi blagovne znamke, pod katerimi se prodajajo (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 29).
Nevertheless, although the Court has held that the goods and services for which protection is sought are important for identifying the relevant public whose perception needs to be examined, it has also made it clear that the relevant public is not necessarily only that which buys the goods and services covered by the mark, since a broader public than just the consumers targeted may encounter the mark (05/10/2011, T526/09, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 17-18). 
Čeprav Sodišče meni, da so blago in storitve, za katere se zahteva varstvo, pomembni za določitev upoštevne javnosti, katere zaznavanje je treba proučiti, je kljub temu jasno navedlo, da upoštevna javnost ni nujno samo tista, ki kupi blago in storitve, ki jih zajema znamka, saj se lahko z njo sreča tudi širša javnost, in ne samo ciljni potrošniki (05/10/2011, T526/09, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 17-18).
Accordingly, the commercial context of a mark, in the sense of the public targeted by the goods and services, is not always the determining factor in whether that mark would breach accepted principles of morality (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye! 
Zato komercialni okvir znamke v smislu ciljne javnosti za blago in storitve ni vedno odločilni dejavnik pri presoji, ali bi zadevna znamka kršila sprejeta moralna načela (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye!
Illegality is not a necessary condition for giving rise to a conflict with accepted principles of morality: there are words or signs that would not lead to proceedings before the relevant authorities and courts, but that are sufficiently offensive to the general public to not be registered as trade marks (01/09/2011, R 168/20111, fucking freezing! by TÜRPITZ (fig.), § 16). 
Nezakonitost ni nujen pogoj za nastanek nasprotovanja s sprejetimi moralnimi načeli: obstajajo besede ali znaki, ki ne bi privedli do postopka pred ustreznimi organi in sodišči, vendar so dovolj žaljivi za širšo javnost, da niso registrirani kot blagovne znamke (01/09/2011, R 168/20111, fucking freezing! by TÜRPITZ (fig.), § 16).
Furthermore, there is an interest in ensuring that children and young people, even if they are not the relevant public of the goods and services in question, do not encounter offensive words in shops that are accessible to the general public. 
Poleg tega obstaja interes za zagotovitev, da otroci in mladi, tudi če niso upoštevna javnost za zadevno blago in storitve, niso izpostavljeni žaljivim besedam v trgovinah, ki so dostopne širši javnosti.
Dictionary definitions will in principle provide a preliminary indication as to whether the word in question has an offensive meaning in the relevant language (01/09/2011, R 168/20111, fucking freezing! by TÜRPITZ (fig.), § 25), but the key factor must be the perception of the relevant public in the specific context of how and where the goods or services will be encountered. 
Slovarske opredelitve pojmov so načeloma predhodni znak, ali ima zadevna beseda žaljiv pomen v upoštevnem jeziku (01/09/2011, R 168/20111, fucking freezing! by TÜRPITZ (fig.), § 25), ključni dejavnik pa mora biti zaznava upoštevne javnosti v posebnem okviru tega, kako in kje bodo blago ali storitve na voljo.
However, the Boards of Appeal took the view that the word ‘kuro' did not convey to the Hungarian public the offensive meaning of the word ‘kúró' (meaning ‘fucker' in English), since the vowels ‘ó' and ‘ú' are separate letters that are distinct from ‘o' and ‘u', which are pronounced differently and convey different meanings (22/12/2012, R 482/20121, kuro, § 12 et seq.). 
Vendar je odbor za pritožbe menil, da beseda „kuro“ za madžarsko javnost nima žaljivega pomena besede „kúró“ (ki v slovenščini pomeni „fukač“), saj sta samoglasnika „ó“ in „ú“ ločeni črki, ki se razlikujeta od „o“ in „u“, ki se drugače izgovarjata in prinašata drug pomen (22/12/2012, R 482/20121, kuro, § 12 et seq.).
There is a clear risk that the wording of Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR could be applied subjectively so as to exclude trade marks that are not to the examiner's personal taste. 
Obstaja jasno tveganje, da bi se lahko besedilo člena 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uporabljalo subjektivno za izključitev znamk, ki ne ustrezajo osebnemu okusu preizkuševalca.
However, for the word(s) to be objectionable, it (they) must have a clearly offensive impact on people of normal sensitivity (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye! 
Da je (so) beseda(-e) sporna(-e), mora(-jo) imeti očitno žaljiv učinek na osebe, ki so občutljive, kot je to običajno (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye!
There is no need to establish that the applicant wants to shock or insult the relevant public; the fact that the EUTM applied for might be seen, as such, to shock or insult is sufficient (23/10/2009, R 1805/20071, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 27, confirmed 05/10/2011, T526/09, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 20 et seq.). 
Ni treba ugotoviti, da prijavitelj želi presuniti ali žaliti upoštevno javnost; zadostuje dejstvo, da bi bilo mogoče blagovno znamko EU, za katero je vložena prijava, šteti za nespodobno ali žaljivo samo po sebi (23/10/2009, R 1805/20071, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 27, potrjena 05/10/2011, T526/09, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 20 et seq.).
Finally, it is not only signs with a ‘negative' connotation that can be offensive. 
Žaljivi pa niso le znaki z negativno konotacijo.
The banal use of some signs with a highly positive connotation can also be offensive (e.g. terms with a religious meaning or national symbols with a spiritual and political value, like ‘ATATURK' for the EU general public of Turkish origin (17/09/2012, R 2613/20112, ATATURK, § 31)). 
Tudi vsakdanja uporaba nekaterih znakov z zelo pozitivno konotacijo je lahko žaljiva (npr. izrazi z verskim pomenom ali nacionalni simboli z duhovno in politično vrednostjo, na primer izraz ATATURK za širšo javnost EU turškega rodu (17/09/2012, R 2613/20112, ATATURK, § 31).
Examples of rejected EUTM applications (public policy and/or morality) 
Primeri zavrnjenih prijav za blagovno znamko EU (javni red in/ali morala)
Examples of accepted EUTM applications 
Primeri sprejetih prijav blagovnih znamk EU
Sign Relevant Consumer Public policy/morality Case No 
Znak Upoštevni potrošnik Javni red/morala Št. zadeve
BIN LADIN General consumer Morality and public policy - the mark applied for will be understood by the general public as the name of the leader of the notorious terrorist organisation Al Qaeda; terrorist crimes are in breach of public order and moral principles (para. 17). 
BIN LADIN Običajni potrošnik Morala in javni red - znamko, za katero je vložena prijava, bo širša javnost razumela kot ime vodje zloglasne teroristične organizacije Al Kaida, teroristična kazniva dejanja kršijo javni red in moralna načela (točka 17).
CURVE 300 General consumer Morality - ‘Curve' is an offensive and vulgar word in Romanian (it means ‘whores'). 
CURVE 300 Običajni potrošnik Morala - „Curve“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v romunščini (pomeni „kurbe“).
CURVE General consumer Morality - ‘Curve' is an offensive and vulgar word in Romanian (it means ‘whores'). 
CURVE Običajni potrošnik Morala - „Curve“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v romunščini (pomeni kurbe).
The relevant public is not limited only to the public to which the goods and services covered by the mark are directly addressed. 
Upoštevna javnost ni samo javnost, ki so ji blago in storitve, ki jih zajema znamka, neposredno namenjeni.
‘Curve' equally offends other persons, who are confronted with the sign accidentally without being interested in these goods and services (para. 19). 
Beseda „curve“ je enako žaljiva za druge osebe, ki se z znakom srečajo naključno, ne da bi se zanimale za to blago in storitve (točka 19).
With regard to the word ‘Curve'+ additions [‘AIRCURVE'], see example below in this paragraph (R 203/20142). 
V zvezi z besedo „curve“ in dodatki [„AIRCURVE﻿ glej primer v nadaljevanju tega odstavka (R 203/20142).
General consumer Morality - ‘fucking' is an offensive and vulgar word in English. 
Običajni potrošnik Morala - „fucking“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v angleščini.
General consumer Morality - ‘HIJOPUTA' is an offensive and vulgar word in Spanish. 
Običajni potrošnik Morala - „HIJOPUTA“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v španščini.
General consumer Morality - the Hungarian Criminal Code bans certain ‘symbols of despotism', including the hammer and sickle as well as the five-pointed red star symbolising the former USSR. 
Običajni potrošnik Morala - madžarski kazenski zakonik prepoveduje nekatere „simbole despotizma“, vključno s kladivom in srpom ter peterokrako rdečo zvezdo, ki simbolizira nekdanjo ZSSR.
This law is not applicable by reason of its normative value but rather as evidence of the perception of the relevant public (paras 59-63) . 
Ta odredba se ne uporablja zaradi normativne vrednosti, temveč kot dokaz o tem, kako upoštevna javnost zaznava znak (točke 59-63).
3: The Hungarian Criminal Code, in force at the time of the judgment (20/09/2011), has been amended by Act C of 2012 to now encompass ‘Use of Symbols of Totalitarianism', used ‘specifically in a way to offend the dignity of victims of totalitarian regimes and their right to sanctity' (formerly Section 269/B, now Section 335 of the Hungarian Criminal Code).] 
3: Madžarski kazenski zakonik, ki je veljal v času sodbe (20. septembra 2011), je bil spremenjen z aktom C iz leta 2012 in danes zajema uporabo simbolov totalitarizma, ki se uporabljajo posebej na način, ki je žaljiv za dostojanstvo žrtev totalitarnih režimov in njihovo pravico do svetosti življenja (prej oddelek 269/B, zdaj oddelek 335 madžarskega kazenskega zakonika).]
PAKI General consumer Morality - ‘PAKI' is a racist insult in English. 
PAKI Običajni potrošnik Morala - „PAKI“ je rasistična žaljivka v angleščini.
SCREW YOU General consumer (for goods other than sex products) Morality - a substantial proportion of ordinary citizens in Britain and Ireland would find the words ‘SCREW YOU' offensive and objectionable (para. 26). 
SCREW YOU Običajni potrošnik (za blago, ki niso spolni pripomočki) Morala - Velik del navadnih državljanov v Veliki Britaniji in na Irskem bi besedi „SCREW YOU“ štel za žaljivi in sporni (točka 26).
FICKEN General consumer Morality - ‘FICKEN' is an offensive and vulgar word in German (it means ‘fuck'). 
FICKEN Običajni potrošnik Morala - „FICKEN“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v nemščini (pomeni fukati).
ATATURK Average consumer in the EU general public of Turkish origin Morality - banal use of signs with a highly positive connotation can be offensive under Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR. 
ATATURK Povprečen potrošnik splošne javnosti EU turškega rodu Morala - v skladu s členom 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je lahko vsakdanja uporaba znakov z zelo pozitivno konotacijo žaljiva.
‘ATATURK' is a national symbol of spiritual and political value for the European general public of Turkish origin. 
„ATATURK“ je nacionalni simbol z duhovno in politično vrednostjo za pripadnike splošne evropske javnosti turškega rodu.
FUCK CANCER General consumer Morality - the word ‘FUCK' is not only a ‘slightly rude word' in combination with the word ‘CANCER', but offensive and indecent, at least for the English-speaking part of the trade circles (para. 19). 
FUCK CANCER Običajni potrošnik Morala - beseda „FUCK“ ni samo malce nevljudna beseda v kombinaciji z besedo „CANCER“, temveč je tudi žaljiva in nespodobna, vsaj za angleško govorečo upoštevno javnost (točka 19).
MECHANICAL APARTHEID General consumer Public policy - ‘APARTHEID' refers to an offensive former political regime in South Africa that included state terror, torture and the denial of human dignity. 
MECHANICAL APARTHEID Običajni potrošnik Javni red - „APARTHEID“ se nanaša na žaljiv nekdanji politični režim v Južni Afriki, ki je vključeval državni teror, mučenje in zanikanje človekovega dostojanstva.
The message conveyed by the sign for computer games, related publications and entertainment is contrary to the European Union's public policy, since it contradicts the indivisible, universal values on which the EU is founded, i.e. human dignity, freedom, physical integrity, equality and solidarity, and the principles of democracy and the rule of law (para. 30). 
Sporočilo, ki ga prenaša znak računalniških iger, povezan s publikacijami in zabavo, je v nasprotju z javnim redom Evropske unije, saj zanika nedeljive, univerzalne vrednote, na katerih temelji EU, tj. človekovo dostojanstvo, svobodo, telesno celovitost, enakost in solidarnost ter načeli demokracije in pravne države (točka 30).
MH17 MH370 General consumer Morality - acronyms of the flights. 
MH17 MH370 Običajni potrošnik Morala - kratice poletov.
The trade mark application ‘Fack Ju Göhte' contains the phonetic reproduction in German of the expression ‘Fuck you'. 
Prijava blagovne znamke „Fack Ju Göhte“ vsebuje fonetično reprodukcijo izraza „fuck you“ v nemščini.
It is true that the sign also contains the word ‘Göhte'; however, the decisive factor is that the dominant component at the beginning of the trade mark application ‘Fack ju' is already so insulting and offensive that the relevant public will be offended by it' (para 32). 
Res je, da znak vsebuje tudi besedo „Göhte“, vendar je odločilen dejavnik ta, da je prevladujoč element „Fack ju“ na začetku prijave blagovne znamke že sam dovolj žaljiv, da bo užalil tudi upoštevno javnost (točka 32).
01/12/2016, R 2205/20155, under appeal, T69/17) 
01/12/2016, R 2205/20155, predmet pritožbe, T69/17
General consumer Public policy and morality - mafia-type organised crime is a clear and present threat to the whole of the EU. 
Običajni potrošnik Javni red in morala - organizirani kriminal mafijskega tipa je jasna in navzoča grožnja za vso EU.
The EU's policies have evolved in the context of manifold international efforts to tackle this threat. 
V okviru številnih mednarodnih prizadevanjih so se razvile politike EU za spopadanje s to grožnjo.
The EU has both codrafted and drawn on international laws and standards, resulting in a comprehensive anti-organised crime policy. 
EU je sodelovala pri pripravi osnutkov in oblikovanju mednarodnih predpisov in standardov, na podlagi katerih je nastala celovita politika za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu.