natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
genuine use must relate to goods or services already marketed or about to be marketed and for which preparations by the undertaking to secure customers are under way, particularly in the form of advertising campaigns (paragraph 37); 
resna in dejanska uporaba se mora nanašati na blago ali storitve, ki se že tržijo ali se bodo kmalu začeli tržiti in v zvezi s katerimi podjetje že izvaja dejavnosti za pritegnitev strank, zlasti z oglaševalskimi kampanjami (točka 37),
when assessing whether there has been genuine use, regard must be had to all the facts and circumstances relevant to establishing whether the commercial exploitation of the mark is real, in particular whether such use is viewed as warranted in the economic sector concerned to maintain or create a share in the market for the goods or services protected by the mark (paragraph 38); 
presoja resne in dejanske uporabe mora temeljiti na vseh dejstvih in okoliščinah, ki so pomembni za ugotovitev resnične uporabe znamke na trgu, zlasti tega, ali se v zadevnem gospodarskem sektorju taka uporaba upošteva kot upravičena za ohranjanje ali ustvarjanje deleža na trgu za blago ali storitve, ki jih varuje znamka (točka 38),
the circumstances of the case may, therefore, include giving consideration, inter alia, to the nature of the goods or services at issue, the characteristics of the market concerned and the scale and frequency of use of the mark (paragraph 39); 
okoliščine zadeve lahko zato vključujejo obravnavo med drugim narave zadevnega blaga ali storitev, značilnosti zadevnega trga ter obsega in pogostosti uporabe znamke (točka 39),
use need not, therefore, always be quantitatively significant for it to be deemed genuine, as that depends on the characteristics of the goods or services concerned on the corresponding market (paragraph 39). 
zato ni nujno, da je obseg uporabe prejšnje blagovne znamke vedno zelo velik, da bi jo bilo mogoče šteti za resno in dejansko, saj je ta odvisen od značilnosti zadevnega blaga ali storitev na ustreznem trgu (točka 39).
In its order of 27/01/2004, C259/02, Laboratoire de la mer, EU:C:2004:50, the Court further elaborated the Minimax criteria as follows: 
Sodišče je v sklepu 27/01/2004, C259/02, Laboratoire de la mer, EU:C:2004:50, dodatno opredelilo merila iz zadeve Minimax, kot sledi:
the question whether use is sufficient to preserve or create market share for the goods or services concerned depends on several factors and on a case-by-case assessment. 
vprašanje, ali uporaba zadostuje za ohranjanje in ustvarjanje deleža na trgu za zadevno blago ali storitve, je odvisno od številnih dejavnikov in presoje vsakega primera posebej.
The characteristics of the goods and services, the frequency or regularity of the use of the mark, whether the mark is used for the purpose of marketing all the identical goods or services of the proprietor or merely some of them, or evidence that the proprietor is able to provide, are among the factors that may be taken into account (paragraph 22); 
Značilnosti blaga in storitev, pogostost ali rednost uporabe znamke, dejstvo, ali se znamka uporablja za trženje vsega enakega blaga ali storitev imetnika ali le za njihov del, ali dokazi o uporabi blagovne znamke, ki jih lahko priskrbi imetnik, so nekateri od dejavnikov, ki jih je mogoče upoštevati (točka 22),
use of the mark by a single client that imports the goods for which the mark is registered can be sufficient to demonstrate that such use is genuine, if it appears that the import operation has a genuine commercial justification for the proprietor of the mark (paragraph 24); 
uporaba blagovne znamke s strani ene stranke, ki uvaža blago, za katero je blagovna znamka registrirana, lahko zadostuje za dokaz, da je takšna uporaba resna in dejanska, če se zdi, da je dejavnost uvoza pristen poslovni razlog za imetnika znamke (točka 24),
a de minimis rule cannot be laid down (paragraph 25). 
pravila de minimis ni mogoče določiti (točka 25).
2.2 Genuine use: standard of proof applied by the Office 
Resna in dejanska uporaba: dokazni standard, ki ga uporablja Urad
Article 47 EUTMR requires proof of genuine use of the earlier mark. 
V skladu s členom 47 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je treba predložiti dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi prejšnje znamke.
Genuine use of a trade mark cannot be proved by means of probabilities or suppositions, but must be demonstrated by solid and objective evidence of effective and sufficient use of the trade mark on the market concerned (18/01/2011, T382/08, Vogue, EU:T:2011:9, § 22). 
Resna in dejanska uporaba blagovne znamke ne more biti izkazana z verjetnimi elementi ali domnevami, ampak mora temeljiti na konkretnih in objektivnih elementih, ki dokazujejo resnično in zadostno uporabo blagovne znamke na zadevnem trgu (18/01/2011, T382/08, Vogue, EU:T:2011:9, § 22).
Moreover, the Office cannot determine ex officio the genuine use of earlier marks. 
Poleg tega Urad po uradni dolžnosti ne more opredeliti resne in dejanske uporabe prejšnjih znamk.
Even proprietors of purportedly well-known marks must submit evidence to prove genuine use of the earlier mark(s). 
Tudi imetniki domnevno dobro znanih znamk morajo predložiti dokaze o resni in dejanski uporabi prejšnje(-ih) znamke (znamk).
The Office does not necessarily require a high threshold of proof of genuine use. 
Urad ne zahteva nujno visokega dokaznega praga za resno in dejansko uporabo.
The Court has indicated that it is not possible to prescribe, in the abstract, what quantitative threshold should be chosen in order to determine whether use was genuine or not, and accordingly there can be no objective de minimis rule to establish a priori the level of use needed in order for it to be ‘genuine'. 
Sodišče je navedlo, da ni mogoče vnaprej abstraktno določiti količinskega praga, ki ga je treba doseči, da bi se lahko uporaba štela za resno in dejansko, zato objektivnega pravila de minimis ni mogoče določiti za vnaprejšnjo opredelitev stopnje uporabe, ki je potrebna za to, da je uporaba resna in dejanska.
So, whilst a minimum extent of use must be shown, what exactly constitutes this minimum extent depends on the circumstances of each case. 
Čeprav je treba dokazati minimalen obseg uporabe, je natančna opredelitev tega minimuma odvisna od okoliščin posameznega primera.
The general rule is that, when it serves a real commercial purpose, even minimal use of the trade mark could be sufficient to establish genuine use, depending on the goods and services, and the relevant market (23/09/2009, T409/07, acopat, EU:T:2009:354, § 35 and case-law cited therein; 02/02/2012, T387/10, Arantax, EU:T:2012:51, § 42). 
Splošno pravilo je, da če se blagovna znamka uporablja za dejanski komercialni namen, tudi minimalna uporaba blagovne znamke zadostuje za ugotovitev obstoja resne in dejanske uporabe, odvisno od blaga in storitev ter upoštevnega trga (23/09/2009, T409/07, acopat, EU:T:2009:354, § 35 in citirana soda praksa; 02/02/2012, T387/10, Arantax, EU:T:2012:51, § 42).
In other words, it is sufficient if the evidence of use proves that the trade mark owner has seriously tried to acquire or maintain a commercial position in the relevant market as opposed to having solely used the mark with the intention of preserving the rights conferred by the mark (token use). 
Z drugimi besedami, zadostovalo bo, če je iz dokazov o uporabi razvidno, da je imetnik blagovne znamke resno poskušal pridobiti ali ohraniti tržni položaj na upoštevnem trgu, ne pa da je blagovno znamko uporabljal le, da bi ohranil pravice, ki iz nje izhajajo (simbolična uporaba).
For instance, in some cases, relatively few sales might be sufficient to conclude that the use is not merely token, in particular with regard to expensive goods (04/09/2007, R 35/20072, DINKY, § 22). 
V nekaterih primerih lahko na primer že razmeroma majhen obseg prodaje zadostuje za ugotovitev, da uporaba ni le simbolična, zlasti v zvezi z dragim blagom (04/09/2007, R 35/20072, DINKY, § 22).
Nonetheless, even if inter alia a very modest amount of use can suffice in certain circumstances, proprietors should adduce comprehensive evidence of use. 
Kljub temu morajo imetniki predložiti izčrpne dokaze o uporabi, čeprav lahko v nekaterih okoliščinah med drugim zadostuje že zelo majhen obseg uporabe.
According to Article 10(3) EUTMDR, the indications and evidence required in order to provide proof of use must concern the place, time, extent and nature of use of the opponent's trade mark for the relevant goods and services. 
V skladu s členom 10(3) Delegirane uredbe se morajo podatki in dokazi o uporabi nanašati na kraj, čas, obseg in naravo uporabe blagovne znamke vložnika ugovora za zadevno blago in storitve.
These requirements for proof of use are cumulative (05/10/2010, T92/09, STRATEGI / Stratégies, EU:T:2010:424, § 43). 
Te zahteve za dokaz o uporabi so kumulativne (05/10/2010, T92/09, STRATEGI / Stratégies, EU:T:2010:424, § 43).
This means that the opponent is obliged not only to indicate but also to prove each of these requirements. 
To pomeni, da mora vložnik ugovora navesti in dokazati vsako od teh zahtev.
However, the sufficiency of the indication and proof as to the place, time, extent and nature of use has to be considered in view of the entirety of the evidence submitted. 
Vendar je treba zadostnost navedb in dokazov glede kraja, časa, obsega in narave uporabe presojati na podlagi vseh predloženih dokazov.
A separate assessment of the various relevant factors, each considered in isolation, is not suitable (17/02/2011, T324/09, Friboi, EU:T:2011:47, § 31). 
Ločena presoja različnih upoštevnih dejavnikov, pri čemer se vsak od njih obravnava posebej, ni primerna (17/02/2011, T324/09, Friboi, EU:T:2011:47, § 31).
Thus, the Office evaluates the evidence submitted in an overall assessment. 
Urad zato predložene dokaze presoja v okviru celovite presoje.
All the circumstances of the specific case have to be taken into account and all the materials submitted must be assessed in conjunction with each other. 
Upoštevati je treba vse okoliščine nekega primera in, vse predloženo gradivo je treba presojati skupaj.
Therefore, although pieces of evidence may be insufficient by themselves to prove the use of an earlier trade mark, they may contribute to proving use in combination with other documentation and information. 
Zato lahko dokazi, čeprav posamično morda ne zadostujejo za dokaz o uporabi prejšnje blagovne znamke, skupaj z drugimi dokumenti in informacijami prispevajo k dokazovanju uporabe.
Evidence of use may be of an indirect/circumstantial nature, such as evidence about the share in the relevant market, the importing of the relevant goods, the supply of the necessary raw materials or packaging to the owner of the mark, or the expiry date of the relevant goods. 
Dokazi o uporabi so lahko posredni, na primer dokazi o deležu na upoštevnem trgu, uvozu upoštevnega blaga, dobavi potrebnih surovin ali embalaže imetniku blagovne znamke ali roku uporabe upoštevnega blaga.
For instance, the judgment of 08/07/2010, T30/09, Peerstorm, EU:T:2010:298, § 42 et seq. found that catalogues in themselves could - under certain circumstances - be conclusive evidence of sufficient extent of use. 
Tako je bilo na primer v sodbi 08/07/2010, T30/09, Peerstorm, EU:T:2010:298, § 42 et seq., ugotovljeno, da so lahko katalogi kot taki v nekaterih okoliščinah prepričljiv dokaz o zadostnem obsegu uporabe.
It is necessary to take into account the specific kind of the goods and services involved when assessing the probative value of the evidence submitted. 
Pri presoji dokazne vrednosti predloženih dokazov je treba upoštevati posebno vrsto zadevnega blaga in storitev.
For example, it may be common in a particular market sector for the samples of the goods and services themselves not to bear indications of the place, time, extent and nature of use. 
V nekem tržnem sektorju je morda na primer običajno, da vzorci blaga in storitev niso opremljeni s podatki o kraju, času, obsegu in naravi uporabe.
In these cases it is obviously inappropriate to disregard such evidence of use if indications in this respect can be found in the other evidence submitted. 
V teh primerih seveda ni ustrezno, da se takšni dokazi o uporabi ne upoštevajo, če so podatki v zvezi s tem morda na voljo v drugih predloženih dokazih.
Each of the documents submitted has to be carefully evaluated as to whether it really reflects use in the 5 years preceding the date of filing or the date of priority of the EUTM application (see paragraph 2.5 below) and use in the relevant territory (see paragraph 2.4 below). 
V zvezi z vsemi predloženimi dokumenti je treba skrbno presoditi, ali dejansko izražajo uporabo v petih letih pred datumom vložitve ali datumom prijave za prednostno pravico blagovne znamke EU (v zvezi s tem glej odstavek 2.5 v nadaljevanju) ali uporabo na upoštevnem ozemlju (glej odstavek 2.4 v nadaljevanju).
In particular, the dates and place of use shown on orders, invoices and catalogues are carefully examined. 
Zlasti je treba skrbno preveriti datume in kraj uporabe, navedene na naročilnicah, računih in v katalogih.
[4: Publication date of the contested EUTM application in the event of oppositions filed before 23/03/2016, see paragraph 2.5.2 below.] 
[4: V primeru ugovorov, vloženih pred 23. marcem 2016, datum, ko je bila objavljena izpodbijana prijava blagovne znamke EU, glej odstavek 2.5.2 v nadaljevanju.]
Material submitted without any indication of date of use may, in the context of an overall assessment, still be relevant and taken into consideration in conjunction with other pieces of evidence that are dated (17/02/2011, T324/09, Friboi, EU:T:2011:47, § 33). 
Gradivo, ki je bilo predloženo brez navedbe datuma uporabe, je lahko še vedno pomembno v okviru celovite presoje in ga je mogoče upoštevati v povezavi z drugimi dokazi, ki so opremljena z datumom (17/02/2011, T324/09, Friboi, EU:T:2011:47, § 33).
This is the case in particular if it is common in a particular market sector for the samples of the goods and services themselves not to bear indications of time (05/09/2001, R 608/20004, PALAZZO / HELADERIA PALAZZO, § 16, noting that ice-cream menus are rarely dated). 
To še zlasti velja, če je v nekem tržnem sektorju običajno, da na vzorcih blaga in storitev čas ni naveden (05/09/2001, R 608/20004, PALAZZO / HELADERIA PALAZZO, § 16, v kateri je bilo ugotovljeno, da so meniji sladoledov le redko opremljeni z datumom).
For implementation of the abovementioned general principles in practice, see the examples in paragraph 3.7.5 below. 
V zvezi z izvajanjem zgoraj navedenih splošnih načel v praksi glej primere v odstavku 3.7.5 v nadaljevanju.
2.3 Nature of use 
Narava uporabe
The term ‘nature of use' refers to: 
Izraz narava uporabe se nanaša na:
use of a mark in accordance with its essential function (paragraph 2.3.1 below); 
uporabo znamke v skladu z njeno bistveno funkcijo (odstavek 2.3.1 v nadaljevanju),
use of the mark as registered or of a variation thereof in accordance with Article 18(1)(a) EUTMR (paragraph 2.7 below); and 
uporabo znamke, kot je bila registrirana, ali njene različice v skladu s členom 18(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (odstavek 2.7 v nadaljevanju) in
use in connection with the goods and services for which it is registered (paragraph 2.8 below). 
uporabo v povezavi z blagom in storitvami, za katere je registrirana (odstavek 2.8 v nadaljevanju).
2.3.1 Use of a mark in accordance with its function 
Uporaba znamke v skladu z njeno funkcijo
2.3.1.1 Use of individual marks 
Uporaba posameznih znamk
Article 18 and Article 47(2) EUTMR require proof of genuine use in connection with the goods or services for which the trade mark is registered and which the opponent cites as justification for its opposition. 
V členu 18 in členu 47(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se zahteva dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi za blago ali storitve, za katere je blagovna znamka registrirana in ki jih je vložnik ugovora navedel kot podlago za ugovor.
Hence, the opponent has to show that the mark has been used as a trade mark on the market. 
Vložnik ugovora mora zato dokazati, da se je blagovna znamka kot taka uporabljala na trgu.
As a trade mark has, inter alia, the function of operating as a link between the goods and services and the person responsible for their marketing, the proof of use must establish a clear link between the use of the mark and the relevant goods and services. 
Ker ima blagovna znamka med drugim funkcijo povezovanja blaga in storitev z osebo, odgovorno za njihovo trženje, je treba z dokazom o uporabi opredeliti jasno povezavo med uporabo blagovne znamke ter upoštevnim blagom in storitvami.
As clearly indicated in Article 10(4) EUTMDR, it is not necessary for the mark to be affixed to the goods themselves (12/12/2014, T105/13 TrinkFix, EU:T:2014:1070, § 2838). 
Kot je jasno navedeno v členu 10(4) Delegirane uredbe, ni nujno, da je znamka nameščena na blago (12/12/2014, T105/13 TrinkFix, EU:T:2014:1070, § 2838).
A representation of the mark on packaging, catalogues, advertising material or invoices relating to the goods and services in question constitutes direct evidence that the mark has been put to genuine use (see also paragraph 2.3.3.2 below). 
Prikaz znamke na embalaži, v katalogih, na oglaševalskem gradivu ali računih, povezanih z zadevnim blagom in storitvami, je neposreden dokaz, da se je znamka resno in dejansko uporabljala (glej tudi odstavek 2.3.3.2 v nadaljevanju).
Genuine use requires that use is made as a trade mark: 
Za resno in dejansko uporabo se zahteva, da se blagovna znamka uporablja kot:
not for purely illustrative purposes or on purely promotional goods or services, 
ne le izključno za ponazoritev ali na povsem promocijskem blagu ali storitvah,
in accordance with its essential function, which is to guarantee the identity of the origin of the goods or services for which it is registered (11/03/2003, C40/01, Minimax, EU:C:2003:145, § 43). 
v skladu z njeno bistveno funkcijo, ki je zagotavljati istovetnost izvora blaga ali storitev, za katere je registrirana (11/03/2003, C40/01, Minimax, EU:C:2003:145, § 43).
Therefore, by way of example, the following are not suitable for supporting genuine use of a trade mark. 
Zato naslednji primeri niso ustrezni v podporo resni in dejanski uporabi blagovne znamke.
Use as a certification mark. 
Uporaba znamke kot certifikacijske znamke.
Certification marks can be obtained in some jurisdictions for compliance with defined standards. 
V nekaterih jurisdikcijah se lahko certifikacijske znamke pridobijo na podlagi skladnosti z določenimi standardi.
The holder of a certification mark is not the authorised user, producer or provider of the certified goods or services, but rather the certifier, which exercises legitimate control over use of the certification mark. 
Imetnik certifikacijske znamke ni pooblaščeni uporabnik, proizvajalec ali ponudnik certificiranega blaga ali storitev, temveč je izdajatelj certifikata, ki izvaja legitimen nadzor nad uporabo certifikacijske znamke.
Certification marks may be used together with the individual trade mark of the producer of the certified goods or of the provider of the certified services. 
Certifikacijske znamke se lahko uporabljajo skupaj s posamezno blagovno znamko proizvajalca certificiranega blaga ali ponudnika certificiranih storitev.
The essential function of a certification mark is different from the essential function of an individual trade mark: while the latter primarily serves to identify the origin of goods and services, the former serves to certify that the goods or services meet certain established standards and possess particular characteristics. 
Bistvena funkcija certifikacijske znamke se razlikuje od bistvene funkcije posamezne blagovne znamke: zadnjenavedena se uporablja predvsem za opredelitev izvora blaga in storitev, prvonavedena pa certificira, da blago ali storitve izpolnjujejo nekatere veljavne standarde in imajo posebne značilnosti.
Therefore, use as a certification mark does not serve as use as an individual trade mark, which is the use required by Article 47(2) and (3) EUTMR (16/08/2011, R 87/20102, DVC DIGITAL VIDEO CALLING (fig.) / DVB DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING (fig.), § 32). 
Zato se uporaba znamke kot certifikacijske znamke ne šteje za uporabo posamezne blagovne znamke, ki je uporaba, zahtevana v členu 47(2) in (3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (16/08/2011, R 87/20102, DVC DIGITAL VIDEO CALLING (fig.) / DVB DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING (fig.), § 32).
Use as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI)/Protected Denomination of Origin (PDO). 
Uporaba znamke kot zaščitene geografske označbe (ZGO)/zaščitene označbe porekla (ZOP).
The essential function of PGIs/PDOs is to designate the origin of goods as being from a particular region or locality. 
Bistvena funkcija ZGO/ZOP je označevanje porekla blaga iz zadevne regije ali kraja.
This is in contrast with the main function of an individual trade mark, namely to serve as an indicator of commercial origin. 
To je v nasprotju z glavno funkcijo posamezne blagovne znamke, in sicer označevati trgovski izvor.
When a PGI/PDO has been registered as an individual mark (and not, for example, as a collective mark), the opponent has to submit proof of use as an individual mark. 
Če je bila ZGO/ZOP registrirana kot posamezna znamka (ne na primer kot kolektivna znamka), mora vložnik ugovora predložiti dokaz o uporabi označbe kot posamezne blagovne znamke.
Evidence of use as a PGI/PDO (e.g. general statements of Regulatory Councils) cannot serve for proving use as an individual mark. 
Dokazov o uporabi kot ZGO/ZOP (npr. splošne izjave regulativnih svetov) ni mogoče uporabljati za dokaz o uporabi kot posamezne znamke.
Use of a sign as a business, company or trade name can be regarded as trade mark use provided that the relevant goods or services themselves are identified and offered on the market under this sign (13/04/2011, T209/09, Alder Capital, EU:T:2011:169, § 5556). 
Uporabo znaka kot poslovnega imena, imena podjetja ali trgovskega imena je mogoče šteti za uporabo blagovne znamke, če so tudi upoštevno blago ali storitve opredeljene in se ponujajo na trgu pod tem znakom (13/04/2011, T209/09, Alder Capital, EU:T:2011:169, § 5556).
In general, this is not the case when the business name is merely used as a shop sign (except when proving use for retail services), or appears on the back of a catalogue or as an incidental indication on a label (18/01/2011, T382/08, Vogue, EU:T:2011:9, § 47). 
To na splošno ne velja, če se poslovno ime uporablja samo kot ime trgovine (razen kadar se uporablja za dokazovanje uporabe za storitve trgovine na drobno) ali se pojavi na zadnji strani kataloga ali kot naključna navedba na etiketi (18/01/2011, T382/08, Vogue, EU:T:2011:9, § 47).
In principle, use of the sign as a company name or trade name, is not, of itself, intended to distinguish goods or services. 
Uporaba znaka kot imena podjetja ali trgovskega imena kot taka načeloma ni namenjena razlikovanju blaga ali storitev.
The purpose of a company name is to identify a company, whereas the purpose of a trade name or a shop name is to designate a business that is being run. 
Namen imena podjetja je identifikacija podjetja, namen trgovskega imena ali imena trgovine pa je označevanje poslovne dejavnosti, ki se izvaja.
Accordingly, where use of a company name, trade name or shop name is limited to identifying a company or designating a business that is being run, such use cannot be considered as being ‘in relation to goods or services' (11/09/2007, C17/06, Céline, EU:C:2007:497, § 21; 13/05/2009, T183/08, Jello Schuhpark II, EU:T:2009:156, § 3132). 
V skladu s tem ni mogoče šteti, da je takšna uporaba povezana z blagom ali storitvami, če je uporaba imena podjetja, trgovskega imena ali imena trgovine omejena na identifikacijo podjetja ali označevanje poslovne dejavnosti, ki se izvaja (11/09/2007, C17/06, Céline, EU:C:2007:497, § 21; 13/05/2009, T183/08, Jello Schuhpark II, EU:T:2009:156, § 3132).
Use of a business, company or trade name can be regarded as use ‘in relation to goods' where: 
Uporabo poslovnega imena, imena podjetja ali trgovskega imena je mogoče šteti za uporabo v zvezi z blagom, če: