natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The aural and conceptual identity may be overridden, in the assessment of likelihood of confusion, by sufficient visual differences between the signs (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 7, Global Assessment, paragraph 7.1). 
Pri presoji verjetnosti zmede lahko zadostne vizualne razlike med znakoma prevladajo nad zvočno in pojmovno enakostjo (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 7: Celovita presoja, odstavek 7.1).
Two-letter/number signs 
Znaki iz dveh črk ali števk
The over-mentioned rule on the importance of visual comparison applies to two-letter/number marks accordingly. 
Zgoraj navedeno pravilo o pomembnosti vizualne primerjave velja tudi za znamke iz dveh črk ali števk.
The comparison of these signs depends on their stylisation and, especially, on whether the letters are recognisable as such in the sign. 
Primerjava teh znakov je odvisna od njihove stilizacije in zlasti od tega, ali so črke v znaku prepoznavne kot črke.
Consequently, the visual overall impression of the signs may be different when two conflicting signs, albeit containing or consisting of the same combination of two-letters, are stylised in a sufficiently different way or contain a sufficiently different figurative element, so that their different overall graphical representation eclipses the common verbal element. 
Zato se vizualni celotni vtis znakov lahko razlikuje, kadar sta sovpadajoča znaka, čeprav vsebujeta isto kombinacijo dveh črk ali sta sestavljena iz nje, stilizirana dovolj različno ali vsebujeta dovolj različen figurativni element, da njun različen celoten grafični prikaz prevlada nad skupnim besednim elementom.
In the following examples, the marks were found visually similar due to the graphic representations/visual similarities of the same two-letter combinations. 
V naslednjih primerih so bile zaradi grafičnih prikazov istih kombinacij dveh črk oziroma njihovih vizualnih podobnosti znamke ugotovljene kot vizualno podobne.
In the following example, the signs were found visually and phonetically dissimilar due to the different graphic representation and the fact that they may not be read as the same letters. 
V naslednjem primeru je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta znaka zaradi različnega grafičnega prikaza in dejstva, da se ne prebereta nujno kot isti črki, vizualno in zvočno različna.
As to the difference in one of the letters see the following examples. 
Glede razlike v eni od črk glej naslednje primere.
Three-letter/number signs 
Znaki iz treh črk/števk
When the signs in conflict are three-letter/number signs, a difference of one letter does not exclude similarity, especially if this letter is phonetically similar. 
Kadar sta sovpadajoča znaka iz treh črk ali števk, razlika v eni črki ne izključuje podobnosti, zlasti če je ta črka zvočno podobna.
Conclusion on similarity 
Ugotovitev glede podobnosti
Each aspect of (visual, phonetic and conceptual) the comparison of signs leads to a decision as to whether the marks are similar and if so, to what degree. 
Vsak vidik (vizualni, zvočni in pojmovni) primerjave privede do odločitve, ali sta znamki podobni, in če sta, kakšna je stopnja podobnosti.
In general, the more commonalities that exist between marks, the higher the degree of similarity. 
Na splošno velja, da več ko imata znamki skupnega, višja je stopnja podobnosti med njima.
An assessment of similarity between two marks means more than taking just one component of a composite trade mark and comparing it with another. 
Presoja podobnosti med znamkama se ne more omejiti na upoštevanje le enega sestavnega dela sestavljene blagovne znamke in ga primerjati z drugim.
On the contrary, the comparison must be made by examining each of the marks in question as a whole, which does not mean that the overall impression conveyed to the relevant public by a composite trade mark may not, in certain circumstances, be dominated by one or more of its components. 
Nasprotno, primerjava se mora izvesti tako, da se prouči vsaka zadevna znamka kot celota, kar pa ne pomeni, da v celotnem vtisu na upoštevno javnost, ki ga naredi sestavljena blagovna znamka, v nekaterih okoliščinah ne prevladuje eden ali več sestavnih delov.
The conclusion as to the degree of similarity of the signs at each of the three levels is the result of an evaluation of all of the relevant factors. 
Ugotovitev glede stopnje podobnosti znakov na vsaki izmed treh ravni se sprejme po presoji vseh upoštevnih dejavnikov.
The main factors that may impact on an assessment of similarity have been explained in the previous paragraphs of this chapter. 
Glavni dejavniki, ki lahko vplivajo na presojo podobnosti, so bili že pojasnjeni v prejšnjih odstavkih tega poglavja.
It should be borne in mind that in an assessment of similarity, the relevant factors (dominance, distinctiveness, etc.) are considered not only for the purpose of determining the common elements of marks, but also to establish any differing and/or additional elements in conflicting signs. 
Treba je upoštevati, da se pri presoji podobnosti upoštevni dejavniki (prevladujoči ali razlikovalni učinek itd.) ne upoštevajo le zato, da se določijo skupni elementi znamk, temveč tudi zato, da se ugotovijo morebitni različni in/ali dodatni elementi v sovpadajočih znakih.
It must also be born in mind that since the assessment of similarity is based on the overall impression of the signs, once signs have been found to be similar, it would not be consistent to find later, in the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion, that ‘the overall impression of the signs is different' in order to support an outcome of no likelihood of confusion. 
Ker presoja temelji na celotnem vtisu znakov, je treba upoštevati tudi, da ob ugotovitvi, da sta znaka podobna, ne bi bilo dosledno, če bi se pozneje, pri celoviti presoji verjetnosti zmede, ugotovilo, da imata „znaka različen celotni vtis“, s čimer bi se podprl izid, da ne obstaja verjetnost zmede.
In general, the following should be considered when assessing similarity and degrees of similarity. 
Na splošno bi bilo treba pri presoji podobnosti in stopnje podobnosti upoštevati naslednje.
impact of the distinctiveness of the elements 
Vpliv razlikovalnega učinka elementov
The greater or lesser degree of distinctiveness of the common elements of the signs is one of the relevant factors in assessing the similarity between signs. 
Višja ali nižja stopnja razlikovalnega učinka skupnih elementov znakov je eden izmed upoštevnih dejavnikov pri presoji podobnosti med znakoma.
For example, if the coincidences between the signs on any of the three aspects of comparison derive from an element with limited distinctiveness, the established degree of visual, aural and/or conceptual similarity, respectively, will be lower than where the elements in common have a normal distinctiveness. 
Če na primer ujemanja med znakoma v katerih koli od treh vidikov primerjave izhajajo iz elementa, ki ima omejen razlikovalni učinek, bo ugotovljena stopnja vizualne, zvočne in/ali pojmovne podobnosti nižja, kot če imata skupna elementa običajen razlikovalni učinek.
For example, if the marks coincide in a descriptive or weak figurative component but also share a distinctive verbal element, the level of aural similarity is not affected. 
Če se na primer znamki ujemata v opisnem ali šibkem figurativnem sestavnem delu, imata pa tudi skupen razlikovalen besedni element, stopnja zvočne podobnosti ostane nespremenjena.
In addition, the impact of a coinciding figurative dominant element is clearly something that affects the visual comparison. 
Ujemanje v figurativnem prevladujočem elementu jasno vpliva na vizualno primerjavo.
In the following examples the signs involved weak/descriptive elements but with different outcomes. 
V naslednjih primerih so znaki vsebovali šibke ali opisne elemente, izidi pa so bili različni.
Impact of the dominant elements 
Vpliv prevladujočih elementov
It should also be noted that where some elements of a trade mark are descriptive or non-distinctive, they are not generally regarded by the public as being dominant in the overall impression conveyed by that mark, unless, particularly because of their position or their size, they appear likely to make an impression on consumers and to be remembered by them. 
Treba je omeniti tudi, da kadar so nekateri elementi blagovne znamke opisni ali nerazlikovalni, teh javnost običajno ne šteje kot prevladujočih v celotnem vtisu, ki ga ustvarja ta znamka, razen če so, zlasti zaradi svojega položaja ali velikosti, videti tako, da bi verjetno naredili vtis na potrošnike in bi si jih ti zapomnili.
It should be emphasised that the abovementioned factors may not be applicable to all cases and the assessment of similarity is always undertaken on a case-by-case basis and a consideration of further factors may be necessary. 
Treba je poudariti, da omenjena dejavnika ne ustrezata nujno vsem primerom ter da se presoja podobnosti vedno izvede v vsaki zadevi posebej, zaradi česar je morda potrebno upoštevati še druge dejavnike.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the above factors and principles do not call into question the principle that the examination of the similarity of trade marks must take into account the overall impression produced by them on the relevant public. 
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da zgornji dejavniki in načela niso v nasprotju z načelom, da je treba pri preizkusu podobnosti blagovnih znamk upoštevati celotni vtis, ki ga naredita na upoštevno javnost.
Impact of word versus figurative elements 
Vpliv besednih v primerjavi z vplivom figurativnih elementov
Therefore, if the coincidences between composite signs (signs comprising word and figurative elements) lie within the verbal elements and the differences arise out of the figurative elements, the degree of visual and aural similarity is likely to be higher than average (see example below). 
Če se sestavljena znaka (znaka, ki imata besedni in figurativni element) ujemata v besednih elementih, v figurativnih elementih pa razlikujeta, bo stopnja vizualne in zvočne podobnosti verjetno višja od povprečne (glej primer v nadaljevanju).
In general, the identity or similarity of the figurative component of the signs is insufficient to establish a considerable level of similarity where at least one of the signs contains a further verbal component that is not contained in the other sign. 
Na splošno enakost ali podobnost figurativnega sestavnega dela znakov ne zadostuje za ugotovitev precejšnje stopnje podobnosti v primerih, pri katerih vsaj eden od znakov vsebuje dodaten besedni sestavni del, ki ga v drugem znaku ni.
However, although the word elements of a mark may have a greater impact, this is not necessarily the case where the figurative element visually dominates the overall impression made by the mark (see paragraph 3.4.6.1 above). 
Čeprav imajo besedni elementi znamke lahko večji vpliv, pa ni nujno tako, če je figurativni element v okviru celotnega vtisa znamke prevladujoč (glej odstavek 3.4.6.1 zgoraj).
Beginning of signs 
Začetek znakov
In principle, coincidences at the beginning of signs increase their similarity more than coincidences in the middle or at the end of signs. 
Načeloma se z ujemanjem na začetku znakov njuna podobnost poveča bolj kot z ujemanjem na sredini ali na koncu znakov.
Therefore, consumers attach less importance to the end of the mark and coincidences located at the end of signs would lead to a finding of a lower degree of visual similarity than common elements at the beginning of signs (see first example below). 
Za potrošnike je konec znamke manj pomemben in če se znaka ujemata na koncu, bo ugotovljena nižja stopnja vizualne podobnosti, kot če imata skupni element na začetku (glej prvi primer v nadaljevanju).
Likewise, the position of the coinciding/similar phonemes or syllables at the beginning of the conflicting signs would increase the degree of aural similarity. 
Podobno je stopnja zvočne podobnosti med zadevnima znakoma višja, če so enaki ali podobni fonemi ali zlogi na začetku znakov.
However, the degree of similarity will usually be lower, despite identical beginnings, if those are the weak elements in the signs or if the remaining elements have a clearly different meaning (see second example below). 
Stopnja podobnosti bo kljub enakemu začetku običajno nižja, če sta na začetku šibka elementa ali če imajo ostali elementi jasno različen pomen (glej drugi primer v nadaljevanju).
Short signs 
Kratki znaki
The length of the signs may influence their overall impression and thus the effect of the differences between them. 
Dolžina znakov lahko vpliva na celoten vtis in tako na učinek razlik med njimi.
In principle, the shorter a sign is, the more easily the public is able to perceive all its single elements. 
Načeloma velja, da kolikor krajši je znak, lažje lahko javnost zazna vse njegove posamezne elemente.
The application of the abovementioned principles and factors should not be automatic. 
Omenjena načela in dejavniki se ne bi smeli uporabljati kar samodejno.
The decision has to explain their relevance for the particular case and weigh them up. 
V odločbi je treba pojasniti, zakaj so pomembni za obravnavano zadevo, in jih pretehtati.
However, the rules explained in this chapter have a general character and the particularities of a specific case may justify different findings. 
Pravila, pojasnjena v tem poglavju, so splošna in zaradi posebnih značilnosti določene zadeve so lahko upravičene drugačne ugotovitve.
However, in such cases it is of even greater importance to provide a clear and thorough reasoning in the decision. 
V takih primerih je še pomembnejše, da odločba vsebuje jasno in temeljito obrazložitev.
4 Dissimilarity of Signs 
Različnost znakov
The similarity of signs is a necessary condition for a finding of a likelihood of confusion under Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR. 
Za ugotovitev verjetnosti zmede v skladu s členom 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU mora biti izpolnjen pogoj podobnosti med znakoma.
An assessment of the similarity between two marks must be based on the overall impression created by them, in particular, by their distinctive and dominant components (23/10/2002, T6/01, Matratzen + Matratzenmarkt Concord (fig.), EU:T:2002:261, § 32 and the case-law cited). 
Presoja podobnosti med znamkama mora temeljiti na celotnem vtisu, ki ga ustvarjata ti znamki, zlasti pa njuni razlikovalni in prevladujoči sestavni deli (23/10/2002, T6/01, Matratzen + Matratzenmarkt Concord (fig.), EU:T:2002:261, § 32 and the case-law cited).
Where the overall impression is that the signs are dissimilar, this excludes the likelihood of confusion. 
Kadar je celotni vtis, da sta znaka različna, je verjetnost zmede izključena.
The finding as to whether signs are similar or dissimilar overall is the result of a combined assessment of (i) the visual, phonetic, conceptual overlaps and differences and (ii) the significance of the overlaps and differences in the perception of the relevant public. 
Da se doseže ugotovitev, ali sta znaka na splošno podobna ali različna, se presodijo (i) vizualna, zvočna ter pojmovna prekrivanja in razlike ter (ii) pomembnost prekrivanj in razlik v okviru zaznave upoštevne javnosti.
Where the signs at issue are dissimilar, 
Kadar sta zadevna znaka različna,
the general rule is that the goods and services do not need to be compared. 
blaga in storitev načeloma ni treba primerjati.
Only the signs are compared and the examination stops upon concluding on the dissimilarity of the signs. 
Primerjata se samo znaka in preizkus se ustavi, ko se ugotovi, da sta različna.
Nevertheless, reasoning strategy may justify a comparison of some of the goods and services and continue the assessment of the similarity of signs for the remaining goods and services only, where the signs are otherwise dissimilar due to an overlap exclusively in a descriptive or non-distinctive element (see paragraph 4.2.5 below). 
Kljub temu je zaradi pristopa k obrazložitvi lahko upravičena primerjava nekaterega blaga in storitev, presoja podobnosti znakov pa se nadaljuje samo za preostalo blago in storitve, če sta znaka sicer različna, ker se prekriva izključno opisen ali nerazlikovalen element (glej odstavek 4.2.5 v nadaljevanju).
For example, in the case of long lists of goods and services, it may prove more efficient to first rule on the dissimilarity of some of the goods and services, and continue to the comparison of the signs (including the assessment of distinctive components in several languages) only for the remaining, shorter list of goods and services. 
Če je na primer seznam blaga in storitev dolg, je morda učinkoviteje najprej odločiti, da so nekatero blago in storitve različni, nato pa se postopek nadaljuje s primerjavo znakov (vključno s presojo razlikovalnih sestavnih delov v več jezikih) le za preostali, krajši seznam blaga in storitev.
Any claim of enhanced distinctiveness is not examined. 
Morebitno sklicevanje na povečani razlikovalni učinek se ne preizkusi.
If the signs are dissimilar, the opposition under Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR must be rejected regardless of any enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark. 
Če sta znaka različna, je treba ugovor v skladu s členom 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU zavrniti ne glede na morebitni povečani razlikovalni učinek prejšnje znamke.
Where the marks in question are not similar, there is no need to take account of the reputation of the earlier mark, since it does not fall within the scope of the test of similarity and cannot serve to increase the similarity between those marks (14/03/2011, C370/10 P, EDUCA Memory game, EU:C:2011:149, § 50-51 and the case-law cited). 
Kadar zadevni znamki nista podobni, ni treba upoštevati ugleda prejšnje znamke, saj ta ne spada na področje uporabe preizkusa podobnosti, zaradi njega se ne more povečati podobnost med navedenima znamkama (14/03/2011, C370/10 P, EDUCA Memory game, EU:C:2011:149, § 50-51 ter navedena sodna praksa).
There is no global assessment of factors. 
Celovita presoja dejavnikov se ne opravi.
The decision concludes that in the absence of one of the conditions, the opposition under Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR must be rejected. 
V odločbi se ugotovi, da je treba, ker ni izpolnjen eden izmed pogojev, ugovor v skladu s členom 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU zavrniti.
4.2 Scenarios for dissimilarity 
Primeri različnosti
4.2.1 No element in common 
Ni skupnega elementa
The signs are obviously dissimilar if they have nothing in common in any of the three aspects of comparison. 
Če znaka v nobenem izmed treh vidikov primerjave nimata nič skupnega, sta seveda različna.
This is more a hypothetical scenario as the signs at issue in an opposition under Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR normally have something in common. 
Ta primer je bolj hipotetičen, saj imata znaka, v zvezi s katerima je vložen ugovor v skladu s členom 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, običajno kaj skupnega.
What is rather debated by the parties is the significance of the overlap in an element. 
Stranke razpravljajo bolj o tem, kako pomembno je prekrivanje nekega elementa.
4.2.2 Overlap in a negligible element 
Prekrivanje zanemarljivega elementa
The signs are dissimilar if the only element they have in common is negligible in one or both of the marks in the sense that, due to its size and/or position, it will be likely to go unnoticed or disregarded by the relevant public. 
Znaka sta različna, če je edini skupni element pri eni ali obeh znamkah zanemarljiv, kar pomeni, da ga upoštevna javnost verjetno ne bo opazila ali upoštevala.
Negligible elements, after having duly reasoned why they are considered negligible, will not be compared (12/06/2007, C334/05 P, Limoncello, EU:C:2007:333, § 42). 
Zanemarljivi elementi se ne primerjajo, potem ko Urad ustrezno utemelji, zakaj jih šteje za zanemarljive (12/06/2007, C334/05 P, Limoncello, EU:C:2007:333, § 42).
The notion of negligible elements should be strictly interpreted and, in the event of any doubt, the assessment should cover all the elements of the sign (see paragraph 1.5 above). 
Pojem zanemarljivih elementov je treba razlagati ozko, presoja pa mora v primeru dvoma zajemati vse elemente znaka (glej odstavek 1.5 zgoraj).
Concerning the assessment as to whether an element is negligible, the test is not whether the Office can, in a meticulous side-by-side examination of the signs, decipher the element concerned. 
Pri presoji, ali je neki element zanemarljiv, se ne preverja, ali lahko Urad v okviru natančnega preizkusa znakov drugega ob drugem razbere zadevni element.
The question is rather whether, in the overall impression of the sign, the element is noticeable by the average consumer who normally perceives a sign as a whole and does not proceed to analyse its various details. 
Pravo vprašanje je, ali element v okviru celotnega vtisa znaka lahko opazi povprečni potrošnik, ki običajno znak zaznava kot celoto in ne preverja posameznih podrobnosti.
4.2.3 Overlap in a verbal element not noticeable due to high stylisation 
Prekrivanje besednega elementa, ki zaradi močne stilizacije ni opazen
The signs are dissimilar if the verbal element, which would give rise to similarity, is not discernible due to its high stylisation. 
Znaka sta različna, če besedni element, zaradi katerega bi bila podobna, ni prepoznaven, ker je močno stiliziran.
Sometimes the way in which letters or symbols are used makes it unrealistic to assume that they will be read and pronounced, for example, when in a figurative mark a symbol or letter is repeated in order to create a pattern, is highly distorted or otherwise not clearly legible. 
Včasih je zaradi načina, kako so črke ali simboli uporabljeni, nerealno domnevati, da jih bo mogoče prebrati in izgovoriti, kadar se na primer simbol ali črka v figurativni znamki ponovi zaradi oblikovanja vzorca ali pa je močno popačena ali sicer slabo berljiva.
If the verbal element is not recognisable in the overall impression of the sign, thus, not legible and not pronounceable, it will not be taken into account in the comparison. 
Če besednega elementa v okviru celotnega vtisa znaka ni mogoče prepoznati ter posledično prebrati in izgovoriti, se pri primerjavi ne bo upošteval.
Again, the test is not whether the Office can, in a meticulous side-by-side examination of the signs, identify the verbal element concerned. 
Še enkrat naj se poudari, da se ne preverja, ali lahko Urad v okviru natančnega preizkusa znakov drugega ob drugem prepozna zadevni besedni element.
It is irrelevant if the verbal element is recognised only with the help of the other mark, as the consumer normally does not have the opportunity to compare signs side by side. 
Če se besedni element prepozna le ob pomoči druge znamke, to ni pomembno, saj potrošnik običajno ne more primerjati znakov drugega ob drugem.
Furthermore, it is irrelevant that the party refers to its mark by a particular verbal element in its submissions or if the particulars of the mark indicate a verbal element, because the consumer will not be assisted by that information on encountering the sign as registered or applied for. 
Poleg tega ni pomembno, da stranka v svojih predloženih elementih imenuje znak z določenim besednim elementom ali da je besedni element naveden v podrobnem opisu znamke, saj si potrošnik ne bo mogel pomagati s temi informacijami, ko se bo srečal z znakom, kot je registriran ali je zanj vložena prijava.
The question whether the verbal element is indeed ‘lost' in the stylisation must be carefully assessed. 
Vprašanje, ali se je besedni element s stilizacijo dejansko „izgubil“, je treba skrbno pretehtati.
The consumer intuitively looks for pronounceable elements in figurative signs by which the sign can be referred to. 
Potrošnik v figurativnih znakih intuitivno išče izgovorljive elemente, s katerimi se lahko nanaša na znak.
The high stylisation of one or more letters of a word may not prevent the consumer from identifying the verbal element as a whole, particularly, if it suggests a concrete meaning. 
Močna stilizacija ene ali več črk v besedi še ne pomeni, da potrošnik ne bo prepoznal besednega elementa kot celote, zlasti če namiguje na konkreten pomen.