natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ownership of EU collective marks is limited to (i) associations of manufacturers, producers, suppliers of services, or traders that, under the terms of the law governing them, have the capacity in their own name to have rights and obligations of all kinds, to make contracts or accomplish other legal acts and to sue and be sued; and (ii) legal persons governed by public law (Article 74 EUTMR). 
Lastništvo kolektivnih znamk EU je omejeno na (i) združenja izdelovalcev, proizvajalcev, izvajalcev storitev ali trgovcev, ki imajo po pravu, ki velja zanje, sposobnost, da imajo pravice in obveznosti vseh vrst, pravice do sklepanja pogodb ali izvrševanja drugih pravnih dejanj ter sposobnost, da tožijo in so tožene, in (ii) javnopravne osebe (člen 74 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The first type of owner typically comprises private associations with a common purpose or interest. 
Prva vrsta imetnikov običajno vključuje zasebna združenja s skupnim namenom ali interesom.
As set out in the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 2, Formalities, paragraph 8.2.1, ‘[c]ollective does not mean that the mark belongs to several persons [co-applicants/co-owners] nor that it designates/covers more than one country'. 
Kot je določeno v Smernicah, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 2: Formalnosti, odstavek 8.2.1, „[i]zraz ,kolektivna‘ ne pomeni, da znamka pripada več osebam [soprijaviteljem/soimetnikom] ali da označuje/zajema več kot eno državo“.
Associations may be organised under different legal forms, including that of private corporations (such as Gesellschaften mit beschränkter Haftung). 
Združenja so lahko organizirana kot drugačne pravne oblike, tudi zasebne družbe (kot so Gesellschaften mit beschränkter Haftung).
However, as the latter are generally not organised as associations, the Office considers that a private corporation cannot be the owner of an EU collective mark unless it shows that its internal structure is of an associative nature. 
Ker pa te običajno niso organizirane kot združenja, Urad meni, da zasebna družba ne more biti imetnik kolektivne znamke EU, če ne dokaže, da je njegova notranja zgradba združevalna.
The same applies to the second type of owners. 
Enako velja za drugo vrsto imetnikov.
‘Legal persons governed by public law' have to be either associations in a formal sense or need to have an internal structure of an associative nature (the broader approach, in decision of 10/05/2012, R 1007/20112, REPRESENTATION OF A FLAG WITH STARS (fig.), § 17, relates to the state of the law prior to the creation of the EU certification mark by Regulation 2015/2424). 
Javnopravne osebe morajo biti združenja v formalnem smislu ali pa imeti notranjo zgradbo združevalne narave (širši pristop v odločbi z dne 10/05/2012, R 1007/20112, REPRESENTATION OF A FLAG WITH STARS (fig.), § 17, se nanaša na stanje prava pred uvedbo certifikacijske znamke EU z Uredbo (EU) 2015/2424).
This concept includes, for example, associations or corporations governed by public law, such as the consejos reguladores or colegios profesionales under Spanish law. 
Ta koncept na primer vključuje združenja ali družbe javnega prava, kot so consejos reguladores ali colegios profesionales na podlagi španskega prava.
3 Specific Absolute Grounds of Refusal 
Posebni absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev
3.1 Misleading as to the character or meaning of the mark 
Zavajanje glede značaja ali pomena znamke
Under Article 76(2) EUTMR, the examiner must refuse the application if the public is liable to be misled as regards the character or the meaning of the mark, in particular if it is likely to be perceived as something other than a collective mark. 
V skladu s členom 76(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU mora preizkuševalec prijavo zavrniti, če obstaja verjetnost zmede v javnosti glede značaja ali pomena blagovne znamke, še zlasti, če je verjetno, da jo bo javnost razumela kot nekaj drugega kot kolektivno blagovno znamko.
This refers to the situation where the mark will not be perceived as a collective mark by the public, but rather as an individual or certification mark. 
To se nanaša na situacije, v katerih javnost znamke ne bo razumela kot kolektivno znamko, ampak kot posamezno ali certifikacijsko znamko.
For example, a collective mark that is available for use only by members of an association that owns the mark could be liable to mislead if it gives the impression that it is available for use by anyone that is able to meet certain objective standards. 
Na primer, kolektivna znamka, ki je na voljo za uporabo le članom združenja, ki je imetnik znamke, bi lahko bila zavajajoča, če vzbuja vtis, da jo lahko uporabljajo vsi, ki izpolnjujejo določene objektivne standarde.
It could also mislead if it conveys a strong certification message (for example, (invented example), which is a clear contradiction of the function of the collective mark). 
Zavajajoča bi lahko bila tudi, če ima močno certifikacijsko sporočilo (na primer, (izmišljeni primer), ki je v jasnem nasprotju s funkcijo kolektivne znamke).
A collective mark would not, as such, be considered misleading as to its character by the sole fact that the regulations governing use may also include specific requirements of use with respect to the quality of the goods and services protected by the mark. 
Značaj kolektivne znamke ni zavajajoč samo zaradi dejstva, da lahko pravilnik o uporabi vključuje tudi posebne zahteve za uporabo v zvezi s kakovostjo blaga in storitev, zaščitenih z znamko.
However, where examination of the regulations governing use reveals that the mark is actually to be used as a certification mark and not as an indicator that the goods and services come from the members of the association, it will be considered to mislead the public. 
Če pa preizkušanje pravilnika o uporabi razkrije, da se namerava znamka dejansko uporabljati kot certifikacijska znamka in ne kot kazalnik, da blago in storitve izvirajo od članov združenja, se šteje, da zavaja javnost.
3.2 Regulations governing use 
Pravilnik o uporabi
3.2.1 Filing 
Predložitev
The regulations governing use may be filed within 2 months of the application of the collective mark (Article 75(1) EUTMR) and their content must comply with the requirements of Article 16 EUTMIR. 
Pravilnik o uporabi se lahko predloži v dveh mesecih po datumu vložitve prijave kolektivne znamke (člen 75(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), njegova vsebina pa mora biti skladna z zahtevami iz člena 16 Izvedbene uredbe.
3.2.2 Content 
Vsebina
The regulations governing use form an integral part of the collective mark. 
Pravilnik o uporabi je sestavni del kolektivne znamke.
They must specify the persons authorised to use the mark and the conditions for membership of the association, and can also include the conditions of use of the mark (Article 16 EUTMIR). 
Določati mora osebe, pooblaščene za uporabo znamke, in pogoje za članstvo v združenju, ter vključevati pogoje uporabe znamke (člen 16 Izvedbene uredbe).
The regulations governing use should reflect the specific kind of mark of the application and the fact that the mark is indeed a collective mark, which will be used by the members of the association. 
Pravilnik o uporabi mora navajati posebno vrsto znamke iz prijave in dejstvo, da je znamka dejansko kolektivna znamka, ki jo bodo uporabljali člani združenja.
In addition, where the collective mark is applied for by making use of the ‘geographical derogation' (see paragraph 4.1 below), the regulations governing use must explicitly authorise any person whose goods or services originate in the geographical area concerned to become a member of the association that is the proprietor of the mark. 
Poleg tega mora pravilnik, če se pri prijavi kolektivne znamke izkoristi „geografsko odstopanje“ (glej odstavek 4.1 v nadaljevanju), vsaki osebi, katere blago ali storitve izvirajo z zadevnega geografskega območja, izrecno omogočati, da postane član združenja, ki je nosilec blagovne znamke.
Substantive examination of the application will begin only once the regulations governing use have been received. 
Vsebinsko preizkušanje prijave se začne šele po prejemu pravilnika o uporabi.
3.2.3 Compliance with public policy and morality 
Skladnost z javnim redom in moralo
If the regulations governing use of the mark are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality, the EU collective mark application must be refused under Article 76(1) EUTMR. 
Če je pravilnik o uporabi znamke v nasprotju z javnim redom ali sprejetimi moralnimi načeli, je treba prijavo kolektivne znamke EU zavrniti na podlagi člena 76(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
This ground for refusal applies in addition to Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR, which relates in the first place to the sign applied for. 
Ta razlog za zavrnitev se uporablja dodatno k členu 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ki se nanaša predvsem na znak, za katerega je bila vložena prijava.
It refers to situations where, regardless of the trade mark, the regulations governing use of the mark contain a provision that is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality. 
Zadeva situacije, v katerih pravilnik o uporabi znamke ne glede na blagovno znamko vsebuje določbo, ki je v nasprotju z javnim redom ali sprejetimi moralnimi načeli.
This would be the case, for example, where the authorisation or conditions of use discriminate between market operators without due justification (such as a lack of objective criteria or the application of inadmissible criteria) or where the regulations governing use establish manifestly discriminatory fees. 
Tako je, na primer kadar pooblastilo ali pogoji uporabe razlikujejo med udeleženci na trgu brez ustrezne utemeljitve (kot je neobstoj objektivnih meril ali uporaba nedopustnih meril) ali kadar pravilnik o uporabi določa očitno diskriminatorne pristojbine.
3.2.4 Remedies 
Pravna sredstva
In some cases, it will be possible to amend the regulations governing use in order to remove a ground for refusal of an EU collective mark application (Article 76(3) EUTMR) raised by the Office under Articles 76(1) and (2) EUTMR. 
V nekaterih primerih je mogoče spremeniti pravilnik o uporabi, da se odpravi razlog za zavrnitev kolektivne znamke EU (člen 76(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), ki ga Urad vloži na podlagi člena 76(1) in (2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
4 Specificities as Regards the General Absolute Grounds for Refusal 
Posebnosti v zvezi s splošnimi absolutnimi razlogi za zavrnitev
In addition to the specific grounds for refusal applicable to collective marks, applications for this kind of mark need to be examined with regard to the absolute grounds for refusal listed in Article 7(1) EUTMR (Article 74(3) EUTMR). 
Razen v zvezi s posebnimi razlogi za zavrnitev, ki se uporabljajo za kolektivne znamke, je treba prijave za tovrstne znamke preizkusiti tudi v zvezi z absolutnimi razlogi za zavrnitev, navedenimi v členu 7(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (člen 74(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
This means that EU collective mark applications will, like any other EUTM application, be assessed on all general grounds for refusal laid down in Article 7(1) EUTMR. 
To pomeni, da se prijava kolektivne znamke EU tako kot vsaka druga prijava blagovne znamke EU preizkusi glede vseh splošnih razlogov za zavrnitev iz člena 7(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
If, for example, a collective mark is not inherently distinctive under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR, it will be refused (18/07/2008, R 229/20064, CHARTERED MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT, § 7). 
Če na primer kolektivna znamka v skladu s členom 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU nima svojstvenega razlikovalnega učinka, bo zavrnjena (18/07/2008, R 229/20064, CHARTERED MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT, § 7).
4.1 Descriptive signs and the ‘geographical derogation' 
Opisni znaki in „geografsko odstopanje“
Pursuant to Article 74(2) EUTMR, signs or indications that may serve, in trade, to designate the geographical origin of the goods or services may constitute EU collective marks. 
V skladu s členom 74(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU so znaki in označbe, ki v gospodarskem prometu lahko označujejo geografski izvor blaga ali storitev, lahko kolektivne znamke EU.
As a result, a sign that describes the geographical origin of the goods or services (and that would be refused if it were applied for as an individual EUTM) can be accepted if: 
Zato se lahko sprejme znak, ki opisuje geografski izvor blaga ali storitev (in bi bil zavrnjen, če bi bila zanj vložena prijava za posamezno blagovno znamko EU), če:
it is validly applied for as an EU collective mark; and 
je zanj veljavno vložena prijava za kolektivno znamko EU in
it complies with the authorisation set out in Article 75(2) EUTMR (05/10/2006, R 280/20061, VINO NOBILE, § 16-17). 
je skladen s pooblastilom iz člena 75(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (05/10/2006, R 280/20061, VINO NOBILE, § 16-17).
According to this provision, the regulations governing use of an EU collective mark that is descriptive must authorise any person whose goods or services originate in the geographical area concerned to become a member of the association that is the proprietor of the mark. 
V skladu s to določbo mora pravilnik o uporabi kolektivne znamke EU, ki je opisna, vsaki osebi, katere blago ali storitve izvirajo z zadevnega geografskega območja, omogočiti, da postane član združenja, ki je nosilec znamke.
For example, an application for the word mark ‘Alicante', specifying tourist services, should be refused under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR if it is applied for as an individual EUTM, given that it describes the geographical origin of the services. 
Tako je treba na primer prijavo za besedno znamko Alicante, ki opredeljuje turistične storitve, zavrniti na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če je bila zanjo vložena prijava za posamezno blagovno znamko EU, ker opisuje geografsko poreklo storitev.
However, as an exception, if it is validly applied for as an EU collective mark (i.e. it is applied for by an association or a legal person governed by public law and it complies with the other requirements of EU collective marks) and the regulations governing use of the mark contain the authorisation set out in Article 75(2) EUTMR, it will be accepted for registration. 
Vendar bo registracija izjemoma sprejeta, če je zanjo veljavno vložena prijava za kolektivno znamko EU (tj. če prijavo vloži združenje ali javnopravne osebe in če so izpolnjene druge zahteve glede kolektivnih znamk EU) in če pravilnik o uporabi znamke vključuje pooblastilo iz člena 75(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
This exception only applies to those signs that are descriptive of the geographical origin of the goods and services. 
Ta izjema se uporablja samo za znake, ki opisujejo geografsko poreklo blaga in storitev.
If the EU collective mark is descriptive of other characteristics of the goods or services, this exception does not apply and the application will be refused under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR (08/07/2010, R 934/20101, ENERGY WINDOW, § 38; 12/12/2014, R1360/20145, DOWNMARK, § 35; 15/11/2012, T278/09, GG, EU:T:2012:601, § 48, 49; 17/05/2011, T341/09, Txakoli, EU:T:2011:220, § 33-35). 
Če kolektivna znamka EU opisuje druge značilnosti blaga ali storitev, se ta izjema ne uporablja, prijava pa se zavrne na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (08/07/2010, R 934/20101, ENERGY WINDOW, § 38; 12/12/2014, R1360/20145, DOWNMARK, § 35; 15/11/2012, T278/09, GG, EU:T:2012:601, § 48, 49; 17/05/2011, T341/09, Txakoli, EU:T:2011:220, § 33-35).
4.2 Objections raised under Article 7(1)(j), (k) or (l) EUTMR 
Ugovori na podlagi člena 7(1)(j), (k) ali (l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
In the event that the goods and services have to be limited as a consequence of an objection raised under Article 7(1)(j) (geographical indication), 7(1)(k) (traditional terms for wines) or 7(1)(l) EUTMR (traditional specialities guaranteed), the applicant of the EU collective mark has to amend the regulations governing use accordingly (Article 16(h) EUTMIR). 
Če je treba blago in storitve omejiti zaradi ugovora, vloženega na podlagi člena 7(1)(j) (geografska označba), člena 7(1)(k) (tradicionalni izrazi za vina) ali člena 7(1)(l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti), mora prijavitelj kolektivne znamke EU ustrezno spremeniti pravilnik o uporabi (člen 16(h) Izvedbene uredbe).
For further information regarding these objections, please see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapters 10, 11 and 12. 
Več informacij o teh ugovorih je na voljo v Smernicah, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavja 10, 11 in 12.
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part B, Examination Page 2 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del B, Preizkušanje stran 8
Absolute Grounds for Refusal - European Union Certification Marks 
Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev - Certifikacijske znamke Evropske unije
CHAPTER 16 
POGLAVJE 16
EUROPEAN UNION CERTIFICATION MARKS 
CERTIFIKACIJSKE ZNAMKE EVROPSKE UNIJE
1 Relevant Provisions 3 
1 Zadevne določbe 3
2 Definition and Specific Function 3 
2 Opredelitev in posebna funkcija 3
2.1 Definition 3 
2.1 Opredelitev 3
3.1 Sign and distinguishing capacity 4 
3.1 Znak in razlikovalna sposobnost 4
3.2 Description as certification mark 4 
3.2 Opis certifikacijske znamke 4
3.3 List of goods and services 4 
3.3 Seznam blaga in storitev 4
3.4 Regulations governing use 5 
3.4 Pravilnik o uporabi znamke 5
4 Specific Requirement as Regards Ownership 5 
4 Posebne zahteve v zvezi z lastništvom 5
5 Examination of the Specific Grounds of Refusal 6 
5 Preizkušanje posebnih razlogov za zavrnitev 6
5.1 Misleading as to the character or the meaning of the mark 6 
5.1 Zavajanje glede značaja ali pomena znamke 6
5.2 Certification of the geographical origin 6 
5.2 Certificiranje geografskega porekla 6
5.3 Regulations governing use 7 
5.3 Pravilnik o uporabi znamke 7
5.3.1 Standard to be certified 7 
5.3.1 Standard, ki se certificira 7
5.3.2 Persons authorised to use the mark 8 
5.3.2 Osebe, pooblaščene za uporabo znamke 8
5.3.3 Testing, supervision and conditions of use, sanctions 8 
5.3.3 Preverjanje, nadzor in pogoji uporabe ter sankcije 8
5.3.4 Compliance with public order 8 
5.3.4 Skladnost z javnim redom 8
5.3.5 Remedies 9 
5.3.5 Pravna sredstva 9
6 Specificities as Regards the Examination of the General Grounds for Refusal 9 
6 Posebnosti v zvezi s preizkušanjem splošnih absolutnih razlogov za zavrnitev 9
Relevant Provisions 
Zadevne določbe
As of 1 October 2017, the certification mark is codified as a new kind of European Union trade mark governed by specific provisions. 
Certifikacijska znamka je od 1. oktobra 2017 kodificirana kot nova vrsta blagovne znamke Evropske unije, ki jo urejajo posebne določbe.
Until the latest amendment of the EUTMR by Amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2424, certification marks could not be protected as European Union trade marks. 
Do zadnje spremembe Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU z Uredbo (EU) 2015/2424 o spremembi varstvo certifikacijskih znamk kot blagovnih znamk Evropske unije ni bilo mogoče.
The relevant specific provisions for certification marks have been laid down in Chapter VIII EUTMR and are completed by the provision of Article 17 EUTMIR. 
Ustrezne specifične določbe za certifikacijske znamke so zajete v poglavju VIII Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, dopolnjujejo pa jih določbe iz člena 17 Izvedbene uredbe.
EU designations in international registrations (IRs) are addressed in Article 194 EUTMR. 
Mednarodne registracije, v katerih je imenovana EU, so obravnavane v členu 194 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The general provisions of the EUTMR apply to EU certification marks as well, unless the specific provisions of Articles 83 to 93 EUTMR provide otherwise. 
Splošne določbe Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se uporabljajo tudi za certifikacijske znamke EU, če specifične določbe členov 83 do 93 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne določajo drugače.
The latter lay down some particularities and exceptions to the general EUTM regime as regards EU certification marks, which need to be taken into account when filing and examining such marks. 
Ti členi določajo nekatere posebnosti in izjeme od splošne ureditve za blagovne znamke EU ter jih je treba upoštevati pri vložitvi prijave za te znamke in preizkušanju teh znamk.
Definition and Specific Function 
Opredelitev in posebna funkcija
The certification mark is a third kind of European Union trade mark established by the EUTMR in addition to the individual trade mark and the collective trade mark. 
Certifikacijska znamka je tretja vrsta blagovnih znamk Evropske unije, ki jo poleg posamezne blagovne znamke in kolektivne znamke uvaja Uredba o blagovni znamki EU.
Article 83(1) EUTMR defines the EU certification mark as a mark that ‘is capable of distinguishing goods or services which are certified by the proprietor of the mark in respect of material, mode of manufacture of goods or performance of services, quality, accuracy or other characteristics, with the exception of geographical origin, from goods and services which are not so certified'. 
Člen 83(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU certifikacijsko znamko opredeljuje kot znamko, ki „omogoča razlikovanje med blagom ali storitvami, ki jih je imetnik znamke certificiral na podlagi materiala, načina proizvodnje blaga ali opravljanja storitev, kakovosti, natančnosti ali drugih značilnosti z izjemo geografskega porekla, na eni strani ter blagom in storitvami, ki niso certificirani, na drugi strani“.
The list of possible characteristics to be certified by an EU certification mark is non-exhaustive and can relate to characteristics other than material, mode of manufacture or performance, quality or accuracy. 
Seznam možnih značilnosti, ki jih certificira certifikacijska znamka EU, ni izčrpen in se lahko nanaša na druge značilnosti kot material, način proizvodnje blaga ali opravljanja storitev, kakovost ali natančnost.
It explicitly excludes, however, the possibility of certifying the geographical origin of goods or services. 
Izrecno pa izključuje možnost certificiranja geografskega porekla blaga ali storitev.
The owner of the certification mark does not necessarily have to provide the certification services itself. 
Ni nujno, da imetnik certifikacijske znamke sam zagotavlja storitve certificiranja.
It is sufficient that the certification process is conducted under its control and supervision (see paragraph 5.3.3 below). 
Zadostuje, če kontrolira postopek certificiranja in se ta izvaja pod njegovim nadzorom (glej odstavek 5.3.3 v nadaljevanju).
Specific function 
Posebna funkcija
A certification mark indicates that the goods or services bearing the mark (i) comply with a given standard set out by the owner of the mark (ii) as a result of a control set up by the certification mark owner, (iii) irrespective of the identity of the undertaking that actually produces or provides the goods and services at issue and actually uses the certification mark. 
Certifikacijska znamka označuje, da so blago in storitve z znamko (i) skladni z zadevnim standardom, ki ga določi imetnik znamke, (ii) kot rezultat nadzora, ki ga vzpostavi imetnik certifikacijske znamke, (iii) ne glede na identiteto podjetja, ki dejansko proizvaja zadevno blago ali opravlja storitve ter dejansko uporablja certifikacijsko znamko.
The certification mark's essential distinguishing function, therefore, relates to the guarantee of specific characteristics of certain goods and services. 
Bistvena razlikovalna funkcija certifikacijske znamke se tako nanaša na jamstvo posebnih značilnosti zadevnega blaga in storitev.
Sign and distinguishing capacity 
Znak in razlikovalna sposobnost
First, as with any EUTM, a certification mark needs to be a sign capable of being represented on the Register of European Union trade marks. 
Prvič, certifikacijska znamka mora biti kot vse blagovne znamke EU znak, ki se lahko prikaže v registru blagovnih znamk Evropske unije.
In this respect, the general rules apply (Article 83(3) and Article 4 EUTMR). 
V zvezi s tem se uporabljajo splošna pravila (člen 83(3) in člen 4 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).