natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If so, the party adversely affected by the error must be informed accordingly. 
V tem primeru je treba o tem ustrezno obvestiti stranko, ki jo je napaka prizadela.
As revocation/cancellation will be to the latter's advantage, the decision can be revoked or the entry cancelled at the same time as the letter is sent (to both parties). 
Ker bo imela zadnjenavedena stranka koristi od razveljavitve ali izbrisa, se lahko odločba razveljavi ali vpis izbriše hkrati s pošiljanjem dopisa (obema strankama).
There is no need for the party that benefited from the error to submit observations, as its letter informing the Office of the error can be taken as its agreement to revocation/cancellation. 
Stranki, ki je imela koristi od napake, ni treba predložiti pripomb, saj se lahko dopis, s katerim je Urad obvestila o napaki, šteje za njeno strinjanje z razveljavitvijo ali izbrisom.
Likewise, there is no need to hear the party adversely affected, as a decision is made in its favour. 
Prav tako ni treba zaslišati stranke, ki jo je napaka prizadela, saj se sprejme odločba njej v prid.
For example, where an applicant informs the Office that its EUTM application has been registered despite being rejected in an opposition, the entry in the Register must be cancelled. 
Na primer, ko prijavitelj Urad obvesti, da je bila njegova prijava blagovne znamke EU registrirana, čeprav jo je Urad zavrnil v okviru ugovora, je treba vpis v register izbrisati.
There is no need to hear either the applicant (who benefited from the error) or the opponent (who was adversely affected by it). 
Zaslišati ni treba niti prijavitelja (ki je imel koristi od napake) niti vložnika ugovora (ki ga je napaka prizadela).
Finally, once a revocation or cancellation has become final, it must be published if a wrong entry in the Register has already been published. 
Nazadnje, potem ko razveljavitev ali izbris postane dokončen, je to treba objaviti, če je bil napačen vpis v register že objavljen.
If the Office finds that, despite information received from either party, there are no reasons to revoke a decision/cancel an entry or it is no longer possible, it informs the parties accordingly, giving appropriate reasons (and forwarding the original request to the other party for information purposes). 
Če Urad ugotovi, da kljub informacijam, prejetim od ene ali druge stranke, ni razlogov za razveljavitev odločbe ali izbris vpisa ali ta nista več mogoča, o tem ustrezno obvesti stranki in navede ustrezne razloge (ter pošlje izvirno zahtevo drugi stranki v vednost).
2 Correction of Errors in Decisions and Other Notifications 
Popravljanje napak v odločbah in drugih obvestilih
Article 102(1) EUTMR 
Člen 102(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
2.1 Correction of linguistic errors, errors of transcription and manifest oversights in decisions 
Popravljanje jezikovnih napak, napak pri prepisu in očitnih spregledov v odločbah
2.1.1 General remarks 
Splošne pripombe
According to Article 102(1) EUTMR, the Office will correct any linguistic errors or errors of transcription and manifest oversights in its decisions. 
V skladu s členom 102(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU bo Urad v svojih odločbah popravil vse jezikovne napake, napake pri prepisu in očitne spreglede.
It is apparent from the wording that the only legitimate purpose of corrections made on the basis of this provision is to correct spelling or grammatical errors, errors of transcription or errors that are so obvious that nothing other than the wording as corrected could have been understood. 
Iz besedila je razvidno, da je edini legitimni namen popravljanja napak na podlagi te določbe popraviti pravopisne ali slovnične napake, napake pri prepisu ali napake, ki so tako očitne, da je edina razumljiva ubeseditev samo popravljeno besedilo.
However, when the error affects the dictum of a decision, only revocation is possible, and then only if all the conditions are met. 
Kadar pa napaka vpliva na izrek odločbe, je mogoča samo razveljavitev, in to le, če so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji.
When fixing of costs is part of the dictum of the decision it can be corrected only by revocation. 
Če je določitev stroškov del izreka odločbe, jo je mogoče popraviti le z razveljavitvijo.
The distinction between revocation under Article 103 EUTMR and correction under Article 102(1) EUTMR is that revocation annuls a decision, whereas the correction of errors does not affect the validity of the decision and does not open a new appeal period. 
Razlika med razveljavitvijo v skladu s členom 103 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in popravki v skladu s členom 102(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je, da razveljavitev izniči odločbo, popravki napak pa ne vplivajo na veljavnost odločbe in ne zagotavljajo novega roka za pritožbo.
2.1.2 Procedural aspects 
Postopkovni vidiki
As there is no time limit for the correction of linguistic errors, errors of transcription and manifest oversights in decisions, such errors can be corrected any time. 
Ker za popravljanje jezikovnih napak, napak pri prepisu in očitnih spregledov v odločbah ni določen rok, jih je mogoče popraviti kadar koli.
2.1.2.2 Assessment 
Presoja
It must be verified whether the error to be corrected is a linguistic error, an error of transcription or a manifest oversight - in other words, that it does not fall rather within the scope of ‘obvious errors' that can only be corrected through revocation pursuant to Article 103 EUTMR. 
Treba je preveriti, ali je napaka, ki jo je treba popraviti, jezikovna napaka, napaka pri prepisu ali očitni spregled, oziroma da napaka ne spada na področje uporabe „očitnih napak“, ki jih je mogoče v skladu s členom 103 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU popraviti le z razveljavitvijo.
It results from the nature of the errors and oversights that can be corrected pursuant to Article 102 EUTMR that an appeal filed against a decision is not an obstacle to correction of the decision by the first instance department that adopted it. 
Iz vrste napak in spregledov, ki jih je mogoče popraviti v skladu s členom 102 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, izhaja, da vložena pritožba zoper odločbo ne pomeni ovire za to, da jo popravi oddelek na prvi stopnji, ki jo je sprejel.
Nevertheless, the relevant department will inform the Boards of Appeal promptly if it is considering a correction and will also inform them of the outcome of its deliberations (i.e. whether any correction has been made) with a view to it being taken into account in the appeal proceedings. 
Zadevni oddelek bo kljub temu nemudoma obvestil odbore za pritožbe, če obravnava popravek, in jih tudi obvestil o izidu obravnave (tj. ali je sprejel kakšen popravek), da se bo to lahko upoštevalo v pritožbenem postopku.
2.1.2.3 Procedure 
Postopek
Linguistic errors, errors of transcription and manifest oversights in decisions are corrected by sending a corrigendum to the affected party/parties. 
Jezikovne napake, napake pri prepisu in očitni spregledi se popravijo s pošiljanjem popravka prizadeti(-m) stranki(-am).
The accompanying letter must briefly explain the corrections. 
V spremnem dopisu morajo biti na kratko obrazloženi popravki.
Once the correction has been made, the Office makes sure that the changes are reflected in the decision as published in the Office's database. 
Ko je popravek narejen, Urad zagotovi, da so spremembe navedene v odločbi, kot je objavljena v podatkovni zbirki Urada.
The date of the decision remains unchanged after correction. 
Datum odločbe po popravku ostane nespremenjen.
Therefore, the time limit for appeal is not affected. 
Zato popravki ne vplivajo na rok za pritožbo.
2.2 Correction of errors in notifications other than decisions 
Popravljanje napak v obvestilih, ki niso odločbe
Errors in notifications other than decisions can be remedied by sending a corrected notification indicating that the latter replaces and annuls the one previously sent. 
Napake v obvestilih, ki niso odločbe, se lahko popravijo s pošiljanjem popravljenega obvestila, ki vsebuje navedbo, da nadomešča in razveljavlja obvestilo, ki je bilo poslano pred tem.
3 Correction of Technical Errors in Registering a Trade Mark or Publishing the Registration 
Popravljanje tehničnih napak pri registraciji blagovne znamke ali objavi registracije
Articles 44, 102, 111 and 116 EUTMR 
Členi 44, 102, 111 in 116 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 44(1) EUTMR states that EUTM applications that have not been refused on absolute grounds must be published. 
Člen 44(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določa, da je treba prijave blagovnih znamk EU, ki niso bile zavrnjene iz absolutnih razlogov, objaviti.
Articles 44(3) and (4) EUTMR refer to the correction of mistakes and errors in the publication of the application. 
Člen 44(3) in (4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU obravnava popravljanje napak pri objavi prijave.
Article 102 EUTMR refers to mistakes and errors in the registration of an EUTM or in any entry made in the Register in accordance with Article 111(2) and (3) EUTMR or a Decision of the Executive Director pursuant to Article 111(4) EUTMR, and to errors in the publication of those entries in the Register. 
Člen 102 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU obravnava napake pri registraciji blagovne znamke EU ali pri katerem koli vpisu v register v skladu s členom 111(2) in (3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ali sklepom izvršnega direktorja v skladu s členom 111(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in napake pri objavah teh vpisov v register.
The main difference between the correction of an entry in the Register pursuant to Article 102 EUTMR and the cancellation of an entry in the Register pursuant to Article 103 EUTMR is that the former relates to only one part of the publication, whereas the latter cancels the whole entry in the Register. 
Glavna razlika med popravkom vpisa v register v skladu s členom 102 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in izbrisom vpisa v register v skladu s členom 103 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je, da se prvi nanaša le na del objave, pri drugem pa se izbriše celoten vpis v register.
Where there is an error attributable to the Office, the latter corrects it either of its own motion (where the Office itself has become aware of the error) or at the proprietor's request. 
Kadar gre za napako, ki jo je mogoče pripisati Uradu, jo ta popravi bodisi po uradni dolžnosti (kadar Urad sam ugotovi napako) bodisi na zahtevo imetnika.
Corrections of errors in EUTM applications that do not require republication of the application for opposition purposes are published in Section B.2 of the Bulletin. 
Popravki napak v prijavah blagovne znamke EU, za katere ni potrebna ponovna objava prijave zaradi ugovora, se objavijo v razdelku B.2 Biltena.
Corrections pursuant to Articles 44(3) and (4) EUTMR that do require republication of the application for opposition purposes are published in Section A.2. 
Popravki na podlagi člena 44(3) in (4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, za katere je potrebna ponovna objava prijave zaradi ugovora, se objavijo v razdelku A.2.
However, republication will only be required if the initial publication published a more limited list of goods and services. 
Vendar bo ponovna objava potrebna le, če je prvotna objava vsebovala nekoliko bolj omejen seznam blaga in storitev.
For more information on the effect of republication on pending opposition proceedings, see the Guidelines, Part C Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, paragraph 6.1.2. 
Za več informacij o učinku, ki ga ima ponovna objava na tekoče postopke ugovora, glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, odstavek 6.1.2.
In all cases, the affected party/parties is/are notified of the corrections. 
V vseh primer Urad stranko(-e) obvesti o popravkih.
The following are examples of errors that can be corrected (Article 102 EUTMR). 
Sledijo primeri napak, ki se lahko popravijo (člen 102 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The EUTM has been published for one class fewer than applied for. 
Blagovna znamka EU je bila objavljena za en razred manj, kot je bila prijavljena.
The sign ‘x' was applied for and the publication refers to the sign ‘y', or the list of goods and services published is wrong. 
Znak „x“ je bil prijavljen, objavljen pa je znak „y“ ali pa je objavljen napačen seznam blaga in storitev.
The EUTM has been registered without taking into consideration a limitation. 
Blagovna znamka EU je bila registrirana brez upoštevanja omejitve.
Corrections of errors in registered EUTMs that do not require republication for opposition purposes are published in subsection B.4.2 of the Bulletin. 
Popravki napak v registriranih blagovnih znamkah EU, za katere ni potrebna ponovna objava zaradi ugovora, so objavljeni v podrazdelku B.4.2 Biltena.
Corrections pursuant to Article 102 EUTMR that require republication of part of the application for opposition purposes are published in subsection A.2.1.2. 
Popravki v skladu s členom 102 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, za katere je potrebna ponovna objava dela prijave zaradi ugovora, so objavljene v podrazdelku A.2.1.2.
Republication for opposition purposes will always be required where a correction involves changes to the representation of the mark or a broadening of the list of goods and services already published. 
Ponovna objava zaradi ugovora se zahteva vedno, kadar popravek vsebuje spremembe prikaza znamke ali razširja že objavljeni seznam blaga in storitev.
For other corrections, republication must be decided on a case-by-case basis. 
Za preostale popravke se o ponovni objavi odloča za vsak primer posebej.
Corrections to entries in the Register must be published pursuant to Article 102(3) and Article 116(1)(a) EUTMR. 
Popravki vpisov v register morajo biti objavljeni v skladu s členom 102(3) in členom 116(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Corrections of relative errors in an entry in the Register are published in subsection B.4.2 of the Bulletin. 
Popravki relativnih napak pri vpisu v register so objavljeni v podrazdelku B.4.2 Biltena.
All the examples listed above (of corrections and of revocation/cancellations) require publication. 
V vseh zgoraj navedenih primerih (popravkov in razveljavitev ali izbrisov) je potrebna objava.
No corrections need to be published pursuant to Article 102 EUTMR when the initial publication was in the wrong section of the Bulletin. 
V skladu s členom 102 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni treba objaviti popravkov, kadar je bila prvotna objava navedena v napačnem razdelku Biltena.
The legal effect of the publication under Article 11(1) EUTMR remains the same regardless of whether the publication is made in Part B.1 or Part B.2 of the Bulletin'. 
Pravni učinek objave na podlagi člena 11(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ostane enak ne glede na to, ali je bila objava navedena v delu B.1 ali B.2 Biltena.
Time limit. 
Rok.
There is no time limit for corrections pursuant to Article 102 or Article 44(3) and (4) EUTMR. 
Za popravke v skladu s členom 102 ali členom 44(3) ali (4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni nobenega roka.
They can be made at any time once the error has been detected. 
Uvedejo se lahko kadar koli, ko se napaka odkrije.
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part A, General Rules Page 10 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del A, Splošna pravila Stran 10
Revision 
Revizija
SECTION 7 
RAZDELEK 7
REVISION 
REVIZIJA
1 General Principles 3 
1 Splošna načela 3
2 Revision of Decisions in Ex Parte Cases 3 
2 Revizija odločb v zadevah ex parte 3
2.1 Procedures where revision is available 3 
2.1 Postopki, kadar je revizija na voljo 3
2.2 Verification whether the appeal is admissible 4 
2.2 Preverjanje, ali je pritožba dopustna 4
2.3 Verification whether the appeal is well founded 4 
2.3 Preverjanje, ali je pritožba utemeljena 4
2.4 Decision not to grant revision 4 
2.4 Odločitev o zavrnitvi revizije 4
2.5 Decision to grant revision 5 
2.5 Odločba o odobritvi revizije 5
2.5.1 Contents of the decision 5 
2.5.1 Vsebina odločbe 5
2.5.1.1 Reopening the proceedings 5 
2.5.1.1 Ponovitev postopka 5
2.5.1.2 A new decision on the merits 6 
2.5.1.2 Nova odločba na vsebinski podlagi 6
2.6 Communication of the decision 6 
2.6 Obvestilo o odločbi 6
1 General Principles 
Splošna načela
Article 69 EUTMR 
Člen 69 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 58 CDR 
Člen 58 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Pursuant to Article 69 EUTMR in European Union trade mark (EUTM) cases and Article 58 CDR in registered Community design (RCD) cases, revision is only available in ex parte cases, that is to say, those that involve only one party. 
V skladu s členom 69 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v zadevah v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami Evropske unije in s členom 58 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti v zadevah v zvezi z registriranimi modeli Skupnosti je revizija na voljo le v zadevah ex parte, torej tistih, ki zadevajo le eno stranko.
Revision can be granted where an appeal has been lodged against a decision for which the Boards of Appeal are competent pursuant to Article 66 EUTMR and Article 55 CDR. 
Revizija se lahko odobri, če je bila vložena pritožba zoper odločbo, za katero so v skladu s členom 66 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in členom 55 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti pristojni odbori za pritožbe.
It is the responsibility of the Boards of Appeal to decide on an appealed decision. 
Odbori za pritožbe so odgovorni za odločanje glede odločb, zoper katere je vložena pritožba.
The Board sends the appealed decision back to the department that took the decision in order for it to be revised. 
Odbor vrne odločbo, zoper katero je bila vložena pritožba, v revizijo oddelku, ki jo je sprejel.
This enables the first-instance decision taker to rectify the decision if the appeal is admissible and well founded. 
To nosilcu odločanja na prvi stopnji omogoča, da popravi odločbo, če je pritožba dopustna in utemeljena.
The purpose of revision is to avoid the Boards of Appeal ruling on appeals against decisions for which a need for rectification has been recognised by the division that took the decision. 
Namen revizije je preprečiti, da bi morali odbori za pritožbe odločati o pritožbah zoper odločbe, pri katerih je potrebo po spremembi ugotovil oddelek, ki je sprejel odločbo.
If the division of the Office whose decision is appealed considers the appeal to be admissible and well founded, it must rectify its decision. 
Če oddelek Urada zoper odločbo katerega je vložena pritožba, presodi, da je ta pritožba utemeljena, mora popraviti svojo odločbo.
If the decision is not rectified within 1 month following receipt of the statement of grounds of appeal, the appeal must be remitted to the Boards of Appeal without delay and without comment as to its merits. 
Če se odločba v enem mesecu po prejetju izjave z razlogi za pritožbo ne popravi, se pritožba vrne odborom za pritožbe brez odlašanja in brez vsebinskih pripomb.
Since revision requires a pending appeal, it is not available where an appeal has been withdrawn before the 1-month time limit for revision has expired and a decision on revision has not yet been taken. 
Ker je za revizijo potrebna nerešena pritožba, revizija ni na voljo, kadar je pritožba umaknjena pred iztekom enomesečnega roka za revizijo in odločitev o reviziji še ni bila sprejeta.
2 Revision of Decisions in Ex Parte Cases 
Revizija odločb v zadevah ex parte
2.1 Procedures where revision is available 
Postopki, kadar je revizija na voljo
Articles 69 and 159 EUTMR 
Člena 69 in 159 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Articles 58 and 102 CDR 
Člena 58 in 102 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Where revision is available, the Registrar of the Boards of Appeal sends the appeal documents. 
Kadar je revizija na voljo, tajnik odborov za pritožbe pošlje pritožbeno dokumentacijo.
The division concerned examines whether revision may be granted. 
Zadevni oddelek prouči, ali je mogoče odobriti revizijo.
Revision may only be granted where the appeal is admissible and well founded. 
Revizija se lahko odobri le, če je pritožba dopustna in utemeljena.
2.2 Verification whether the appeal is admissible 
Preverjanje, ali je pritožba dopustna
Articles 66 to 68 EUTMR 
Členi 66 do 68 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Articles 21(1) and 23(1) EUTMDR 
Člen 21(1) in člen 23(1) Delegirane uredbe
Articles 55 to 57 CDR 
Členi 55 do 57 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Articles 34(1) and 35(2) CDIR 
Člen 34(1) in člen 35(2) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
The competent division must be satisfied that the appeal is admissible, that is to say, that it complies with the requirements laid down in Articles 66 to 68 EUTMR or Articles 55 to 57 CDR, and Article 21(1) EUTMDR or Article 34(1) CDIR, as well as with all other requirements to which Article 23(1) EUTMDR or Article 35(2) CDIR refer. 
Pristojni oddelek se mora prepričati, ali je pritožba dopustna, tj. ali izpolnjuje zahteve iz členov 66 do 68 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ali členov 55 do 57 Uredbe o znamki Skupnosti in člena 21(1) Delegirane uredbe ali člena 34(1) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti ter druge pogoje iz člena 23(1) Delegirane uredbe ali člena 35(2) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti.
2.3 Verification whether the appeal is well founded 
Preverjanje, ali je pritožba utemeljena
The competent division has to verify whether the appeal is ‘well founded' within the context of the scope of the appeal. 
Pristojni oddelek mora v okviru obsega pritožbe preveriti, ali je pritožba utemeljena.
An appeal will be ‘well founded' within the meaning of Article 69 EUTMR and Article 58 CDR where the competent division finds that the appealed decision was not taken in accordance with the legal provisions under the EU Regulations. 
Pritožba je utemeljena v smislu člena 69 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 58 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti, kadar pristojni oddelek ugotovi, da odločba, zoper katero je bila vložena pritožba, ni bila sprejeta v skladu s pravnimi določbami uredb EU.
This covers cases of obvious procedural error or manifest errors on substance on the part of the Office. 
To zajema primere očitnih postopkovnih napak in očitnih vsebinskih napak, ki jih je storil Urad.
The relevant date for assessing whether the appeal is ‘well founded' is that on which the competent division took the appealed decision. 
Zadevni datum za presojo, ali je pritožba utemeljena, je datum, ko je pristojni oddelek sprejel odločbo, zoper katero je bila vložena pritožba.
Revision will not be granted when the appellant attempts to remedy deficiencies for the first time before the Boards of Appeal, for example, by submitting new arguments or supporting documents. 
Revizija ne bo odobrena, če pritožnik pred odbori za pritožbe šele poskuša odpraviti pomanjkljivosti, na primer tako, da predloži nove trditve ali dokazila.
2.4 Decision not to grant revision 
Odločitev o zavrnitvi revizije
Article 69(2) EUTMR 
Člen 69(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 58(2) CDR 
Člen 58(2) Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
When the competent division concludes that the conditions for granting revision are not met, and at the latest upon expiry of the 1-month time limit provided for in Article 69(2) EUTMR and Article 58(2) CDR, the competent division must remit the case to the Boards of Appeal without any comment or statement. 
Pristojni oddelek mora, če sklene, da zahteve za odobritev revizije niso izpolnjene, najpozneje do izteka enomesečnega roka iz člena 69(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 58(2) Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti primer vrniti odboru za pritožbe brez kakršnih koli pripomb ali izjav.
When the competent division remits the case without comments, no decision has to be taken to refuse revision. 
Če pristojni oddelek primer vrne brez pripomb, ni treba sprejeti odločbe o zavrnitvi revizije.
2.5 Decision to grant revision 
Odločba o odobritvi revizije
Article 69(2) and Article 75 EUTMR 
Člen 69(2) in člen 75 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 33 EUTMDR 
Člen 33 Delegirane uredbe
Articles 37 and 38 CDIR 
Člena 37 in 38 Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
If the competent division concludes that revision will be granted, the rectified decision must be issued within 1 month following receipt of the statement of grounds of the appeal in order to comply with the time limit set in Article 69(2) EUTMR and Article 58(2) CDR. 
Če pristojni oddelek sklene, da se revizija odobri, je treba popravljeno odločbo izdati v enem mesecu po prejetju izjave z razlogi za pritožbo, da se izpolni rok, določen v členu 69(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in členu 58(2) Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti.