natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is immaterial whether the other party agrees with this or not. 
Pri tem ni pomembno, ali se druga stranka s tem strinja ali ne.
When one of the parties opts out before expiry of the extended cooling-off period, the Office will confirm this to both parties and set the cooling-off period to expire 2 weeks after the said notification. 
Kadar ena od strank izstopi iz postopka pred iztekom podaljšanega obdobja za pobotanje, bo Urad to potrdil obema strankama in določil, da se obdobje za pobotanje izteče dva tedna po zadevnem obvestilu.
The adversarial part of the proceedings will commence the day after. 
Kontradiktorni del postopka se bo začel naslednji dan.
The same notification will notify new time limits for substantiation of the opposition and the applicant's reply, which will be 2 and 4 months, respectively, from the end of the cooling-off period. 
V istem obvestilu bo Urad sporočil nova roka za utemeljitev ugovora in prijaviteljev odgovor, in sicer dva oziroma štiri mesece od konca obdobja za pobotanje.
Opting out is irrevocable. 
Odločitev o izstopu iz postopka je nepreklicna.
Opting out during the last month before commencement of the proceedings will not be accepted. 
Vendar take odločitve ni mogoče sprejeti v zadnjem mesecu pred začetkom postopka.
4 Adversarial Stage 
Kontradiktorna faza
4.1 Completion of the opposition 
Dopolnitev ugovora
Within 2 months of expiry of the cooling-off period, the opponent may submit additional facts, evidence and arguments in support of its opposition. 
Vložnik ugovora lahko v dveh mesecih po izteku obdobja za pobotanje predloži dodatna dejstva, dokaze in navedbe v podporo svojemu ugovoru.
Within the same time limit, the opponent must prove the existence, validity and scope of protection of its invoked earlier rights, and submit proof of its entitlement to file the opposition. 
Vložnik ugovora mora v istem roku dokazati obstoj, veljavnost in obseg varstva svojih prejšnjih pravic, na katere se sklicuje, ter predložiti dokaz o upravičenosti do vložitve ugovora.
4.2 Substantiation 
Utemeljitev
Article 46 EUTMR 
Člen 46 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 7 and Article 8(1) EUTMDR 
Člen 7 in člen 8(1) Delegirane uredbe
Substantiation is defined by Article 7(2) EUTMDR and refers to the proof of existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark(s) or right(s), and the proof of entitlement to file the opposition. 
Utemeljitev je opredeljena s členom 7(2) Delegirane uredbe ter se nanaša na dokaz o obstoju, veljavnosti in obsegu varstva prejšnje(-ih) znamke (znamk) ali pravice (pravic) ter dokaz o upravičenosti do vložitve ugovora.
After the parties have been notified of the admissibility of the opposition, the opponent has 2 months from the end of the cooling-off period in which not only to complete its file, that is, present all the evidence in support of its opposition, but also to prove the existence and validity of the earlier rights invoked and its entitlement to file the opposition. 
Ko sta bili stranki uradno obveščeni o dopustnosti ugovora, ima vložnik ugovora na voljo dva meseca od konca obdobja za pobotanje, v katerih mora ne le dopolniti svoj spis, tj. predložiti vse dokaze v podporo svojemu ugovoru, temveč tudi dokazati obstoj in veljavnost prejšnjih pravic, na katere se sklicuje, ter upravičenost do vložitve ugovora.
Where relevant for the opposition, the opponent must also submit evidence of reputation, enhanced distinctiveness or any other aspect affecting the scope of protection of its earlier right(s). 
Kadar je to pomembno za ugovor, mora vložnik ugovora predložiti tudi dokaze o ugledu, povečanem razlikovalnem učinku ali katerem koli drugem vidiku, ki vpliva na obseg varstva njegove(-ih) prejšnje(-ih) pravice (pravic).
The evidence must be in the language of the proceedings or accompanied by a translation for substantiation purposes. 
Dokazi morajo biti v jeziku postopka ali pa jim mora biti za namene utemeljitve priložen prevod.
The translation must be submitted within the time limit for submitting the original. 
Prevod je treba zagotoviti v roku za predložitev izvirnika.
For the specific rules on translation of substantiation evidence, reference is made to paragraphs 4.3.1.1 and 4.3.1.3 for facts, evidence and arguments that must be translated within the substantiation time limit, and to paragraph 4.3.1.2 for substantiation evidence that must be translated only upon the Office's request. 
V zvezi s specifičnimi pravili o prevodu utemeljitvenih dokazov glej odstavka 4.3.1.1 in 4.3.1.3 za dejstva, dokaze in navedbe, ki jih je treba prevesti v roku za utemeljitev, ter odstavek 4.3.1.2 za utemeljitvene dokaze, ki jih je treba prevesti le na zahtevo Urada.
For the purpose of substantiation, the opponent must provide the Office with the necessary proof. 
Vložnik ugovora mora za namene utemeljitve Uradu predložiti potrebne dokaze.
Apart from submitting physical evidence of substantiation, in cases where evidence concerning the filing or registration of the earlier rights or concerning the contents of the relevant national law is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the opponent may formally declare to the Office that it relies on online evidence, and that this online evidence may take the place of any physical evidence. 
Poleg predložitve fizičnih dokazov za utemeljitev lahko vložnik ugovora v primerih, v katerih so dokazi glede vložitve ali registracije prejšnjih pravic ali glede določb ustreznega nacionalnega prava dostopni prek spletnega vira, ki ga priznava Urad, Uradu predloži formalno izjavo, da se opira na spletne dokaze in da lahko ti spletni dokazi nadomeščajo katere koli fizične dokaze.
It is understood from the wording of Article 7(3) EUTMDR that, in order to rely on online evidence, there must be a formal declaration from the opponent asking the Office to access the necessary information for the earlier trade mark from the relevant online official sources. 
Iz določbe člena 7(3) Delegirane uredbe se razume, da se je mogoče na spletne dokaze opreti le, če vložnik ugovora predloži uradno izjavo, v kateri Urad zaprosi, naj do zahtevanih informacij o prejšnji blagovni znamki dostopa prek ustreznih uradnih spletnih virov.
Consequently, as this is optional, the opposing party should formally and proactively let the Office and the other party know it wishes to rely on this option. 
Ker to ni obvezno, mora stranka, ki ugovarja, formalno in proaktivno obvestiti Urad in drugo stranko, da se želi opreti na to možnost.
The declaration must be explicit and unconditional to be accepted. 
Izjava mora biti izrecna in brezpogojna, da se lahko sprejme.
Therefore, the Office will not check the substantiation of any rights online where the opposing party has not expressly and unconditionally consented to the use of online evidence. 
Urad zato ne bo preveril utemeljitve katerih koli pravic na spletu, če stranka, ki ugovarja, ni izrecno in brezpogojno privolila v uporabo spletnih dokazov.
It is noted that, even if the opponent formally declares that online evidence may be relied on, it is the opponent's obligation to check that the online sources reflect the most accurate and up-to-date relevant information. 
Opozoriti je treba, da tudi če vložnik ugovora formalno izjavi, da se je mogoče opirati na spletne dokaze, mora vložnik ugovora preveriti, da so v spletnih virih izražene najbolj natančne in najnovejše ustrezne informacije.
Moreover, in the event that the opponent, after such a declaration, still submits physical evidence without formally revoking its previous declaration, and there is a contradiction between the online evidence and the physical evidence, the most recent up-to-date evidence will apply. 
Poleg tega se, če vložnik ugovora po takšni izjavi še vedno predloži fizične dokaze, ne da bi formalno preklical svojo prejšnjo izjavo, in če so spletni in fizični dokazi v protislovju, uporabljajo najnovejši posodobljeni dokazi.
A declaration may be introduced by the opposing party at any time before expiry of the time limit of substantiation. 
Stranka, ki ugovarja, lahko izjavo predloži kadar koli pred iztekom roka za utemeljitev.
In the absence of any formal declaration (including when such declaration has been withdrawn), the opposition should be rejected as non-substantiated if no physical evidence is presented in due time. 
Če formalna izjava ni predložena (tudi v primeru umika takšne izjave), je treba ugovor zavrniti kot neutemeljen, če niso pravočasno predloženi fizični dokazi.
If the opponent has not proven the existence of at least one earlier right, the opposition will be refused as unfounded. 
Če vložnik ugovora ni dokazal obstoja vsaj ene prejšnje pravice, bo ugovor zavrnjen kot neutemeljen.
If the earlier right that has been found admissible is not substantiated at the substantiation stage and there is/are another/other earlier right(s) that is/are substantiated, the absolute admissibility requirements for that/those earlier right(s) will be checked. 
Če se prejšnja pravica, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je dopustna, v fazi utemeljitve ne utemelji, obstaja pa druga prejšnja pravica ali več takih pravic, ki so utemeljene, je treba preveriti absolutne zahteve za dopustnost za to prejšnjo pravico ali več takih pravic.
In relation to the submission of supporting documents, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits. 
V zvezi s predložitvijo dokazov glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki.
4.2.1 EUTMs and EUTM applications 
Blagovne znamke EU in prijave blagovnih znamk EU
If the earlier mark or application is an EUTM, the opponent does not have to submit any documents as far as the existence and validity of the EUTM (application) is concerned. 
Če je prejšnja znamka ali prijava blagovna znamka EU, vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti dokumentov glede obstoja in veljavnosti (prijave) blagovne znamke EU.
The examination of the substantiation will be done ex officio with respect to the data contained in the Office's database. 
Preizkus utemeljitve bo opravljen po uradni dolžnosti na podlagi podatkov iz podatkovne zbirke Urada.
4.2.2 Converted EUTMs and EUTM applications 
Konvertirane blagovne znamke EU in prijave blagovnih znamk EU
Article 139(1) EUTMR 
Člen 139(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
This section will deal only with specific aspects of conversion in opposition proceedings. 
V tem razdelku bodo obravnavani le posebni vidiki konverzije v postopku ugovora.
For further information on conversion, see the Guidelines, Part E, Register Operations, Section 2, Conversion. 
Za več informacije o konverziji glej Smernice, del E: Registri, razdelek 2: Konverzija.
4.2.2.1 Opposition based on EUTM (application) (to be) converted 
Ugovor, ki temelji na (prihodnji) konvertirani blagovni znamki EU (prijavi blagovne znamke EU)
National applications deriving from the conversion of an earlier EUTM or EUTM application are considered to come into existence as soon as a valid conversion request is submitted. 
Za nacionalne prijave, ki izhajajo iz konverzije prejšnje blagovne znamke EU ali prijave blagovne znamke EU, se šteje, da obstajajo od trenutka, ko je predložena veljavna zahteva za konverzijo.
Such rights will be properly substantiated under Article 7(2) EUTMDR if the opponent indicates the number of the EUTM (or EUTM application) under conversion and the countries for which it has requested conversion. 
Take pravice bodo ustrezno utemeljene na podlagi člena 7(2) Delegirane uredbe, če vložnik ugovora navede številko blagovne znamke EU (ali prijave blagovne znamke EU), ki je predmet konverzije, in države, za katere je zahteval konverzijo.
4.2.2.2 Opposition based on EUTM (application) that is subsequently converted 
Ugovor, ki temelji na blagovni znamki EU (prijavi blagovne znamke EU), ki je pozneje konvertirana
When, during opposition proceedings, the EUTM application (or EUTM) on which the opposition is based ceases to exist (or the list of goods and services is restricted), and a request for conversion is submitted, the proceedings can continue. 
Če prijava blagovne znamke EU (ali blagovna znamka EU), na kateri temelji ugovor, med postopkom ugovora preneha obstajati (ali je seznam blaga in storitev omejen) in je predložena zahteva za konverzijo, se lahko postopek nadaljuje.
This is because national trade mark registrations resulting from a conversion of an EUTM application can constitute the basis of the opposition procedure originally made on the basis of that EUTM application (15/07/2008, R 1313/2006G, CARDIVA (fig.) / CARDIMA (fig.)). 
To pa zato, ker so lahko registracije nacionalne blagovne znamke, ki izhajajo iz konverzije prijave blagovne znamke EU, podlaga za postopek ugovora, ki je bil prvotno uveden na podlagi te prijave blagovne znamke EU (15/07/2008, R 1313/2006G, CARDIVA (fig.) / CARDIMA (fig.)).
In such a case the Office will request the opponent in writing to inform the Office whether it maintains the opposition in view of the withdrawal, surrender or rejection of the earlier EUTM application(s) or registration(s) and whether it intends to rely on the national applications that result from the conversion of the earlier EUTM. 
V takem primeru bo Urad vložnika ugovora pozval, naj ga pisno obvesti, ali glede na umik, odpoved ali zavrnitev prijave (prijav) ali registracije (registracij) prejšnjih blagovnih znamk EU vztraja pri ugovoru in ali se namerava sklicevati na nacionalne prijave, ki izhajajo iz konverzije prejšnje blagovne znamke EU.
If the opponent does not inform the Office within the established time limit that it wishes to rely on the national applications, the opposition will be rejected as unfounded. 
Če vložnik ugovora Urada v določenem roku ne obvesti, da se želi sklicevati na nacionalne prijave, bo ugovor zavrnjen kot neutemeljen.
Evidence of the existence of the earlier national applications must be submitted by the opponent as soon as it becomes available. 
Vložnik ugovora mora dokaze o obstoju prejšnjih nacionalnih prijav predložiti takoj, ko so na voljo.
4.2.3 Trade mark registrations or applications that are not EUTMs 
Registracije ali prijave blagovnih znamk, ki niso blagovne znamke EU
Article 7(2)(a)(i) and (ii) EUTMDR 
Člen 7(2)(a)(i) in (ii) Delegirane uredbe
To substantiate an earlier trade mark application or registration the opponent must provide the Office with evidence of its filing or registration. 
Vložnik ugovora mora za utemeljitev prejšnje prijave ali registracije blagovne znamke Uradu predložiti dokaze o vložitvi prijave ali registraciji.
The Office accepts as evidence of the filing or registration of earlier marks the following documents: 
Urad kot dokaze o vložitvi prijave ali registraciji prejšnjih znamk sprejema naslednje dokumente:
certificates issued by the appropriate official body 
potrdila, ki jih izda ustrezni uradni organ,
extracts from official databases 
izpiske iz uradnih podatkovnih zbirk,
extracts from official bulletins of the relevant national trade mark offices and WIPO. 
izpiske iz uradnih biltenov ustreznih nacionalnih uradov za znamke in organizacije WIPO.
As mentioned above, the opponent may instead ask the Office to access the necessary information for this trade mark from the relevant online official database (see below under 4.2.3.2). 
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, lahko vložnik ugovora namesto tega Urad zaprosi, naj potrebne informacije za to blagovno znamko poišče v ustrezni spletni uradni podatkovni zbirki (glej odstavek 4.2.3.2 v nadaljevanju).
4.2.3.1 Certificates issued by the appropriate official body 
Potrdila, ki jih izda ustrezni uradni organ
Any registration certificate or the most recent renewal certificate showing the validity of the earlier mark beyond the time limit that was given to the opponent to substantiate its opposition, issued by a national office, or by WIPO if it concerns an international registration, constitutes valid evidence. 
Vsako potrdilo o registraciji ali najnovejše potrdilo o podaljšanju, iz katerega je razvidna veljavnost prejšnje znamke po roku, ki je bil odobren vložniku ugovora za utemeljitev ugovora, in ga je izdal nacionalni urad ali organizacija WIPO, če se nanaša na mednarodno registracijo, je veljavni dokaz.
For further requirements relating to renewal certificates, see below. 
Za dodatne zahteve v zvezi s potrdili o podaljšanju glej besedilo v nadaljevanju.
If the opposition is based on an application, the opponent must submit evidence that the application was filed at the national office or that an international application was filed with WIPO. 
Če ugovor temelji na prijavi, mora vložnik ugovora predložiti dokaze, da je bila prijava vložena pri nacionalnem uradu ali da je bila mednarodna prijava vložena pri organizaciji WIPO.
Once the earlier application has proceeded to registration, the opponent must submit evidence of registration. 
Ko je prejšnja prijava registrirana, mora vložnik ugovora predložiti dokaze o registraciji.
If, after the adversarial part of the proceedings, the opponent submits evidence that the national application in fact proceeded to registration before the time limit set in Article 7(1) EUTMDR, the earlier mark will be rejected as unfounded under Article 8(7) EUTMDR. 
Če vložnik ugovora po kontradiktornem delu postopka predloži dokaze, da je bila nacionalna prijava dejansko registrirana pred rokom iz člena 7(1) Delegirane uredbe, bo prejšnja znamka zavrnjena kot neutemeljena na podlagi člena 8(7) Delegirane uredbe.
An application certificate is not sufficient to prove that the trade mark has been registered. 
Potrdilo o prijavi ne zadostuje za dokaz, da je bila blagovna znamka registrirana.
In other words, it cannot serve to prove the existence of a trade mark registration. 
Z drugimi besedami, tega potrdila ni mogoče uporabiti za dokaz obstoja registracije blagovne znamke.
Certificates have to be checked carefully since, in some cases, there are only a few differences between an application form and the registration certificate. 
Potrdila je treba skrbno preveriti, saj lahko v nekaterih primerih obstaja le malo razlik med obrazcem za prijavo in potrdilom o registraciji.
4.2.3.2 Extracts from official databases 
Izpiski iz uradnih podatkovnih zbirk
Extracts from databases are accepted only if their origin is an official database, that is to say, the official database of one of the national offices or WIPO, and if they are equivalent to a certificate of registration or last renewal. 
Izpiske iz podatkovnih zbirk je mogoče predložiti le, če izvirajo iz uradne podatkovne zbirke, tj. uradne podatkovne zbirke enega od nacionalnih uradov ali organizacije WIPO, ali če so enakovredni potrdilu o registraciji ali o zadnjem podaljšanju.
Where an extract is submitted, the unaltered electronic image of an online database extract reproduced on a separate sheet is also acceptable as long as it contains an official identification of the authority or database from which it originates. 
Če je predložen izpisek, je sprejemljiva tudi nespremenjena elektronska slika izpiska iz spletne podatkovne zbirke na ločenem listu, če vsebuje uradno identifikacijo organa ali podatkovne zbirke, iz katere izvira.
Extracts from commercial databases are not accepted, even if they reproduce exactly the same information as the official extracts. 
Izpiski iz komercialnih podatkovnih zbirk niso sprejemljivi, tudi če vsebujejo popolnoma enake informacije kot uradni izpiski.
Examples of extracts that are not accepted are DEMAS, MARQUESA, COMPUSERVE, THOMSON, OLIVIA, PATLINK, SAEGIS or COMPUMARK. 
Med primeri nesprejemljivih izpiskov so DEMAS, MARQUESA, COMPUSERVE, THOMSON, OLIVIA, PATLINK, SAEGIS ali COMPUMARK.
For international registrations, the ROMARIN database is accepted (26/11/2014, T240/13, Alifoods, EU:T:2014:994) . 
V zvezi z mednarodnimi registracijami je mogoče predložiti izpiske iz podatkovne zbirke ROMARIN (26/11/2014, T240/13, Alifoods, EU:T:2014:994).
The ‘short' version of the extract is sufficient as long as it contains all the necessary information, but the extended or long version of the WIPO extract is preferable as it contains all the individual indications for each designated country, including the Statement of Grant of Protection. 
Zadostuje kratka različica izpiska, če vsebuje vse potrebne informacije, vendar je bolj zaželena razširjena ali dolga različica izpiska iz podatkovne zbirke organizacije WIPO, saj vsebuje vse posamezne označbe za vsako imenovano državo, vključno z izjavo o podelitvi varstva.
Extracts from TMview are acceptable evidence concerning international registrations and trade marks applied for or registered with the participating offices, as long as it contains the relevant data, since it reflects the information obtained directly from the databases of WIPO and the national offices. 
Izpiski iz podatkovne zbirke TMview so sprejemljivi dokazi za mednarodne registracije in blagovne znamke, prijavljene ali registrirane pri sodelujočih uradih, če vključujejo vse ustrezne podatke, saj so v zadevni podatkovni zbirki upoštevane informacije, pridobljene neposredno iz podatkovnih zbirk organizacije WIPO in nacionalnih uradov.
If relying on online evidence, the opponent has to provide a direct link to the source or clearly identify the database. 
Če se vložnik ugovora opira na spletne dokaze, mora predložiti neposredno povezavo na vir ali jasno opredeliti podatkovno zbirko.
The Office accepts official extracts from WIPO's ROMARIN or ‘Madrid Monitor' databases and from all the national IP offices' databases, while TMview is acceptable as a portal through which WIPO and the national offices are ‘accessed'. 
Urad sprejema uradne izpiske iz podatkovnih zbirk organizacije WIPO ROMARIN ali Madrid Monitor in iz vseh podatkovnih zbirk nacionalnih uradov za intelektualno lastnino, pri čemer je podatkovna zbirka TMview sprejemljiva kot portal, prek katerega se dostopa do organizacije WIPO in nacionalnih uradov.
General references to such databases and sources are sufficient, with use of a direct hyperlink being optional. 
Zadostujejo splošna sklicevanja na takšne podatkovne zbirke in vire, uporaba neposredne hiperpovezave pa ni obvezna.
For example, where the opponent relies on an earlier Spanish trade mark, the Office will accept indications such as ‘the Spanish national intellectual property office', ‘OEPM', ‘Spanish CEO database', ‘www.oepm.es' or ‘the administration with which the mark was registered', etc. 
Če se vložnik ugovora na primer opira na prejšnjo špansko blagovno znamko, bo Urad sprejel navedbe, kot so španski nacionalni urad za intelektualno lastnino, OEPM, španska podatkovna zbirka CEO, www.oepm.es ali organ, pri katerem je bila blagovna znamka registrirana, itd.
When the extract from an official database or the database accessed online does not contain all the required information, the opponent must supplement it with other documents from an official source showing the missing information. 
Če izpisek iz uradne podatkovne zbirke ali spletno dostopne podatkovne zbirke ne vsebuje vseh potrebnih informacij, ga mora vložnik ugovora dopolniti z drugimi dokumenti iz uradnega vira, ki vsebujejo manjkajoče informacije.
For figurative marks, database extracts sometimes show the image on a separate page. 
Kar zadeva figurativne znamke, je v izpiskih iz podatkovne zbirke včasih slika prikazana na ločeni strani.
Consequently, as regards figurative trade marks, when opponents file an extract as evidence, they must ensure that the representation of the mark appears on the same page and, if not, an additional document/page showing the image must be filed. 
Zato morajo vložniki ugovorov v zvezi s figurativnimi znamkami, kadar kot dokaz predložijo izpisek iz podatkovne zbirke, zagotoviti, da se prikaz znamke pojavi na isti strani, saj morajo v nasprotnem primeru predložiti dodaten dokument ali stran, na kateri je prikazana slika.
This can be from the database itself (which reproduces the image on a separate page that, when printed or saved as PDF, for example, includes an identification of the source) or from another official source (such as its publication in the official bulletin). 
Ta je lahko iz podatkovne zbirke (ki sliko prikaže na ločeni strani, ki pri tiskanju ali shranjevanju v format PDF vključuje opredelitev vira) ali iz drugega uradnega vira (kot je njena objava v uradnem biltenu).