natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since a payment by current account is considered to have been made on the date of receipt of the opposition, if the notice of opposition arrived late, the payment is also late. 
Ker se plačilo prek transakcijskega računa šteje za izvedeno na dan prejema ugovora, je to plačilo prepozno, če je tudi ugovor prispel prepozno.
Therefore, the opposition is deemed not to have been entered. 
Zato se ugovor ne šteje za vloženega.
Failure to indicate or to correctly indicate the amount of the opposition fee does not have any negative effect on the opposition, because it is clear that the opponent wanted to pay the amount of the opposition fee. 
Če se znesek pristojbine za ugovor ne navede oziroma se navede napačno, to nima nikakršnega negativnega učinka na ugovor, ker je jasno, da je vložnik ugovora želel plačati znesek pristojbine za ugovor.
Even if there is no express request from the opponent, the existence of a current account will be sufficient for the account to be debited. 
Tudi če vložnik ugovora ne da izrecnega navodila, obstoj transakcijskega računa zadostuje za bremenitev računa.
This is true regardless of whether the opposition form is used or not. 
To velja ne glede na to, ali je bil uporabljen obrazec za ugovor ali ne.
Fee payment by debiting a current account held by a third party 
Plačilo pristojbine z bremenitvijo transakcijskega računa tretje osebe
Payment of an opposition fee by debiting a current account held by a third party requires the explicit authorisation of the holder of the current account that its account can be debited for that particular fee. 
Za plačilo pristojbine za ugovor z bremenitvijo transakcijskega računa tretje osebe je potrebno izrecno pooblastilo imetnika transakcijskega računa, da se lahko določena pristojbina knjiži v breme njegovega računa.
In such cases the opponent must file an authorisation within the opposition period. 
V takšnih primerih mora vložnik ugovora pooblastilo predložiti v roku za ugovor.
Payment is considered to be made on the date the Office receives the authorisation. 
Plačilo se šteje za izvedeno na dan, ko Urad prejme pooblastilo.
2.2.3 Consequences in the event of non-payment 
Posledice v primeru neplačila
Article 99 EUTMR 
Člen 99 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
An opposition for which the payment is not made within the opposition period will be deemed not to have been entered and the opponent must be notified of this finding. 
Ugovor, za katerega plačilo ni izvedeno v roku za ugovor, se ne šteje za vloženega, vložnik ugovora pa mora biti o tej ugotovitvi uradno obveščen.
A copy of this letter must be sent to the applicant for information purposes at the same time. 
Kopijo tega dopisa je treba hkrati poslati prijavitelju v vednost.
If, within the time limit allowed, the opponent submits evidence that convinces the Office that the loss of rights was incorrect and proves that the payment was made on time, a notification has to be sent, with a copy to the applicant; the applicant will also be sent the evidence submitted by the opponent. 
Če vložnik ugovora v predpisanem roku predloži dokaze, da je bila ugotovitev Urada v zvezi z izgubo pravic nepravilna, in dokaže, da je bilo plačilo izvedeno pravočasno, je treba poslati uradno obvestilo in kopijo prijavitelju, pri čemer bodo prijavitelju poslani tudi dokazi, ki jih je predložil vložnik ugovora.
If an opposition is deemed not to have been entered, the opponent has the right to request a formal decision within 2 months. 
Če se šteje, da ugovor ni bil vložen, ima vložnik ugovora pravico, da v dveh mesecih zahteva formalno odločbo.
If it does so, the decision must be sent to both parties. 
Če to stori, mora biti odločba poslana obema strankama.
For cases in which the opposition fee has not been paid in full or has not been paid until after the opposition period, see paragraph 5.4.1 below. 
Za primere, v katerih pristojbina za ugovor ni bila v celoti plačana oziroma je bila plačana po izteku roka za ugovor, glej odstavek 5.4.1 v nadaljevanju.
2.3 Languages and translation of the notice of opposition 
Jeziki in prevod ugovora
Article 146(5), Article 146(6)(a) and Article 146(7) EUTMR 
Člen 146(5), člen 146(6)(a) in člen 146(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 5(3) and (4) and Article 65 EUTMDR 
Člen 5(3) in (4) ter člen 65 Delegirane uredbe
2.3.1 Language of proceedings 
Jezik postopka
The notice of opposition must be filed in one of the five languages of the Office. 
Ugovor je treba vložiti v enem od petih uradnih jezikov Urada.
The rules regarding the language of proceedings are explained in detail in the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 4, Language of Proceedings. 
Pravila o jeziku postopka so podrobno razložena v Smernicah, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 4: Jezik postopka.
According to these rules, in opposition proceedings there are cases where the opponent has a choice between two possible languages of proceedings (the first and second languages of the contested EUTM application, both being languages of the Office), and cases where there is only one possible language of proceedings (when the first language is not one of the five languages of the Office, the language of the opposition proceedings can only be the second language of the contested EUTM application). 
V skladu s temi pravili so lahko v postopku ugovora primeri, v katerih lahko vložnik ugovora izbira med dvema možnima jezikoma postopka (prvim in drugim jezikom izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU, ki sta oba jezika Urada), in primeri, v katerih je le en možen jezik postopka (če prvi jezik ni eden od petih jezikov Urada, je lahko jezik postopka ugovora lahko samo drugi jezik izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU).
In cases where there is a choice, the language of proceedings will be that expressly indicated by the opponent in the notice of opposition or, in the absence of an express indication, the language in which the notice of opposition was filed, provided in both cases that it is one of the possible languages of proceedings. 
V primerih, v katerih je mogoča izbira, bo jezik postopka jezik, ki ga vložnik ugovora izrecno navede v ugovoru, ali, če izrecne navedbe ni, jezik, v katerem je bil vložen ugovor, in sicer v obeh primerih pod pogojem, da je zadevni jezik eden od možnih jezikov postopka.
Where the wrong language of proceedings is chosen by the opponent, the EUTMR distinguishes between two different scenarios: where the incorrect language is a language of the Office, and where the incorrect language is one of the official languages of the European Union (but not one of the Office). 
Če vložnik ugovora izbere napačni jezik postopka, se v Uredbi o blagovni znamki EU razlikuje med dvema primeroma: kadar je nepravilni jezik jezik Urada in kadar je nepravilni jezik eden od uradnih jezikov Evropske unije (ne pa eden od jezikov Urada).
Depending on which of the above applies, there are different consequences and time limits for the opponent to respect when choosing the correct language of the proceedings and submitting the translation of the notice of opposition. 
Odvisno od tega, za katerega od zgornjih primerov gre, so različne posledice in roki, ki jih mora vložnik ugovora upoštevati pri izbiri ustreznega jezika postopka in predložitvi prevoda ugovora.
If the language chosen by the opponent is a language of the Office, but not one of the possible languages of the proceedings, the opposing party must produce, at its own expense, a translation of the notice of opposition into the first language, providing it is a language of the Office, or into the second language. 
Če je jezik, ki ga je izbral vložnik ugovora, jezik Urada, vendar ne eden od možnih jezikov postopka, mora stranka, ki ugovarja, na lastne stroške priskrbeti prevod ugovora v prvi jezik, če je ta jezik Urada, ali v drugi jezik.
The translation must be produced within 1 month from the expiry of the 3-month opposition period. 
Prevod je treba predložiti v enem mesecu od izteka trimesečnega roka za ugovor.
The language into which the notice of opposition has been translated will then become the language of the proceedings. 
Jezik, v katerega je preveden ugovor, nato postane jezik postopka.
Where the opposing party does not submit the translation within this time limit, the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible. 
Če stranka, ki ugovarja, prevoda ne predloži v tem roku, bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
Article 146(7) EUTMR and Article 5(3) and (4) EUTMDR apply. 
Uporabljata se člen 146(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ter člen 5(3) in (4) Delegirane uredbe.
If the language chosen by the opponent is not a language of the Office, the opposing party must produce, at its own expense, a translation of the notice of opposition into the first language, providing it is a language of the Office, or into the second language. 
Če jezik, ki ga je izbral vložnik ugovora, ni jezik Urada, mora stranka, ki ugovarja, na lastne stroške priskrbeti prevod ugovora v prvi jezik, če je ta jezik Urada, ali v drugi jezik.
The translation must be produced within the 3-month opposition period. 
Prevod je treba predložiti v trimesečnem roku za ugovor.
Where the opposing party does not submit the translation within the opposition period, the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible. 
Če stranka, ki ugovarja, prevoda ne predloži v roku za ugovor, bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
Article 146(5) EUTMR applies as it clearly specifies that the notice of opposition must be filed in a language of the Office. 
Uporablja se člen 146(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, saj je v njem jasno določeno, da je treba ugovor vložiti v jeziku Urada.
If it is not filed in a language of the Office, the 1-month period to remedy the deficiency of Article 146(7) and Article 5(3) EUTMDR does not apply. 
Če ugovor ni vložen v jeziku Urada, se enomesečni rok za odpravo pomanjkljivosti iz člena 146(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 5(3) Delegirane uredbe ne uporablja.
In the event that the language chosen by the opponent is not one of the possible languages of the proceedings, any correspondence issued by the Office in the opposition will be in the first language of the contested mark, providing it is a language of the Office, or in the second language if the first one is not one of the five languages of the Office. 
Če jezik, ki ga izbere vložnik ugovora, ni eden od možnih jezikov postopka, bodo vsi dopisi, ki jih izda Urad v postopku ugovora, v prvem jeziku izpodbijane znamke, če je ta jezik Urada, ali v drugem jeziku, če prvi jezik ni eden od petih jezikov Urada.
The language requirement of the notice of opposition is an absolute admissibility requirement and will be dealt with as explained under paragraph 2.4.1 below. 
Jezikovna zahteva o ugovoru je absolutna zahteva za dopustnost, ki bo obravnavana, kot je pojasnjeno v odstavku 2.4.1 v nadaljevanju.
Concerning the use of official forms, the second sentence of Article 146(6) EUTMR states that when the form provided by the Office is used, it may be used in any official language of the European Union, provided that it is completed in one of the languages of the Office as far as textual elements are concerned. 
Kar zadeva uporabo uradnih obrazcev, je v drugem stavku člena 146(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določeno, da se v primeru uporabe obrazca Urada lahko obrazec uporabi v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije, če je, kar zadeva besedilne elemente, izpolnjen v enem od jezikov Urada.
Where the opponent uses the official form in a language that cannot be the language of the proceedings, all textual elements are in the wrong language and a language has been chosen that cannot be the language of the proceedings, the above principles apply: where the incorrect language chosen is a language of the Office, the opponent has 1 month to file a translation on its own motion; where the incorrect language chosen is not a language of the Office, the deficiency cannot be remedied after the expiry of the opposition period and the opposition will be deemed inadmissible. 
Če vložnik ugovora uporablja uradni obrazec v jeziku, ki ne more biti jezik postopka, so vsi besedilni elementi v napačnem jeziku in je bil izbran jezik, ki ne more biti jezik postopka, se uporabljajo zgornja načela: če je izbrani napačni jezik jezik Urada, mora vložnik ugovora v enem mesecu predložiti prevod na svojo pobudo, če pa izbrani napačni jezik ni jezik Urada, pomanjkljivosti ni mogoče odpraviti po izteku roka za ugovor in ugovor se bo štel za nedopustnega.
2.3.2 Examples 
Primeri
As an illustration of what is explained in paragraph 2.3.1 above, here are some examples. 
V nadaljevanju so navedeni nekateri primeri, v katerih je ponazorjeno, kar je pojasnjeno v odstavku 2.3.1 zgoraj.
a) The languages of the EUTM application are PT and EN. 
Jezika prijave blagovne znamke EU sta portugalščina in angleščina.
The opponent files an opposition in PT, choosing PT as the language of the proceedings. 
Vložnik ugovora vloži ugovor v portugalščini, pri čemer portugalščino izbere za jezik postopka.
As the language of the proceedings has not been correctly chosen, since PT is not a language of the Office, the opponent must submit the translation of the notice of opposition into EN (the only correct language) before the expiry of the opposition period, and EN will therefore become the language of the proceedings. 
Ker jezik postopka ni bil izbran pravilno, saj portugalščina ni jezik Urada, mora vložnik ugovora pred iztekom roka za ugovor predložiti prevod ugovora v angleščini (edini ustrezen jezik), zato bo angleščina postala jezik postopka.
b) The languages of the EUTM application are BG and EN. 
Jezika prijave blagovne znamke EU sta bolgarščina in angleščina.
The opponent files an opposition in BG, and in BG expressly indicates that the language of the proceedings is EN. 
Vložnik ugovora vloži ugovor v bolgarščini, pri čemer v bolgarščini izrecno navede, da je jezik postopka angleščina.
The Office cannot accept an indication in BG that the language should be EN. 
Urad ne more sprejeti navedbe v bolgarščini, da mora biti jezik postopka angleščina.
As the language of the proceedings has not been correctly indicated, since BG is not a language of the Office, the opponent must submit the translation of the notice of opposition into EN (the only correct language) before the expiry of the opposition period, and EN will therefore become the language of the proceedings. 
Ker jezik postopka ni bil naveden pravilno, saj bolgarščina ni jezik Urada, mora vložnik ugovora pred iztekom roka za ugovor predložiti prevod ugovora v angleščini (edini ustrezen jezik), zato bo angleščina postala jezik postopka.
c) The languages of the EUTM application are DE and EN. 
Jezika prijave blagovne znamke EU sta nemščina in angleščina.
The opponent files an opposition in FR. 
Vložnik ugovora vloži ugovor v francoščini.
As FR is a language of the Office and as the language of proceedings can be either DE or EN, the opponent must produce the translation within 1 month of expiry of the opposition period into DE or EN, which will become the language of the proceedings. 
Ker je francoščina jezik Urada in ker je lahko jezik postopka nemščina ali angleščina, mora vložnik ugovora v enem mesecu po izteku roka za ugovor predložiti prevod v nemščini ali angleščini, ki bo postala jezik postopka.
In all of the above examples, if the opponent does not submit the translation into a correct language within the relevant time limit, the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible. 
Če v vseh zgornjih primerih vložnik ugovora prevoda v ustrezni jezik ne predloži v zadevnem roku, bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
However, in the above examples, if the official form had been used in PT, BG and FR respectively, but had been completed in its entirety in EN expressly indicating EN as the language of the proceedings, this would be admissible without any need for a translation into EN to be submitted. 
Če pa bi bil v zgornjih primerih uporabljen uradni obrazec v portugalščini, bolgarščini oziroma francoščini, vendar bi bil v celoti izpolnjen v angleščini ob izrecni navedbi, da je angleščina jezik postopka, bi bilo to sprejemljivo in ne bi bilo treba predložiti prevoda v angleščini.
There would be no need to submit a translation of the official form if all the textual elements, and the indication of language, were in EN. 
Prevoda uradnega obrazca ne bi bilo treba predložiti, če bi bili vsi besedilni elementi in navedba jezika v angleščini.
2.4 Admissibility check 
Preizkus dopustnosti
Articles 2(2) and 5(3) and (5) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2) ter člen 5(3) in (5) Delegirane uredbe
The admissibility check covers both absolute and relative requirements: 
Preizkus dopustnosti obsega absolutne in relativne zahteve:
absolute requirements are the indications and elements that must be present in the notice of opposition or submitted by the opponent on its own initiative within the opposition period, as laid down in Article 2(2)(a) to (c) EUTMDR, and Article 146(5) and (7) EUTMR; 
absolutne zahteve so navedbe in elementi, ki jih mora vsebovati ugovor ali ki jih na lastno pobudo v roku za ugovor predloži vložnik ugovora, kot je določeno v členu 2(2)(a) do (c) Delegirane uredbe ter členu 146(5) in (7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU,
relative requirements are the indications and elements that, if they are not submitted within the opposition period, trigger a deficiency notice from the Office, allowing the opponent to remedy the deficiency within a non-extendable time limit of 2 months, as laid down in Article 2(2)(d) to (h) EUTMDR. 
relativne zahteve so navedbe in elementi, katerih nepredložitev v roku za ugovor pomeni, da bo Urad poslal obvestilo o pomanjkljivostih, na podlagi katerega ima vložnik ugovora za odpravo pomanjkljivosti na voljo dva meseca, ki ju ni mogoče podaljšati, kot je določeno v členu 2(2)(d) do (h) Delegirane uredbe.
In addition, there are optional indications laid down in Article 2(2)(i) and (4) EUTMDR, that do not lead to a finding of non-admissibility, namely the submission of a reasoned statement or an indication of the goods and services against which the opposition is directed. 
Poleg tega so v členu 2(2)(i) in (4) Delegirane uredbe neobvezne navedbe, ki ne privedejo do ugotovitve nedopustnosti, in sicer utemeljena izjava ali navedba o blagu ali storitvah, ki jih ugovor zadeva.
For the purposes of assessing the admissibility of the opposition the Office must base itself solely on the claims contained in the documents submitted by the opponent within the opposition period (21/07/2014, R 1573/20134, OKAY / O-KEY (fig.)). 
Urad mora pri presoji dopustnosti ugovora upoštevati le trditve iz dokumentov, ki jih vložnik ugovora predloži v roku za ugovor (21/07/2014, R 1573/20134, OKAY / O-KEY (fig.)).
Identification elements are to be looked for not only in the notice of opposition, but also in annexes or other documents filed together with the opposition or any documents submitted within the opposition period. 
Elemente za opredelitev je treba poiskati v ugovoru in prilogah ali drugih dokumentih, predloženih skupaj z ugovorom, ali katerih kolih drugih dokumentih, predloženih v roku za ugovor.
Extent of the admissibility check 
Obseg preizkusa dopustnosti
The earlier marks/rights are examined to see if at least one is clearly identified. 
Proučijo se prejšnje znamke/pravice, da se ugotovi, ali je vsaj ena od njih jasno opredeljena.
If the only earlier right on which the opposition is based is not duly identified, the opposition is inadmissible and the opponent is invited to comment on the inadmissibility before the decision on inadmissibility is taken. 
Če edina prejšnja pravica, na kateri temelji ugovor, ni ustrezno opredeljena, je ugovor nedopusten, vložnik ugovora pa je pozvan k predložitvi pripomb glede nedopustnosti, preden se sprejme odločba o nedopustnosti.
If the only earlier right on which the opposition is based is duly identified (absolute requirements), the Office will examine whether it also meets the relative admissibility requirements. 
Če je edina prejšnja pravica, na kateri temelji ugovor, ustrezno opredeljena (absolutne zahteve), bo Urad proučil, ali ugovor izpolnjuje tudi relativne zahteve za dopustnost.
If the opposition is based on more than one earlier right and at least one of them has been correctly identified, the examination of admissibility (relative requirements) can proceed based on that earlier right. 
Če ugovor temelji na več kot eni prejšnji pravici in je bila vsaj ena od njih ustrezno opredeljena, se lahko preizkus dopustnosti (relativne zahteve) nadaljuje na podlagi te prejšnje pravice.
The parties are informed thereof when notification of the time limits for the opposition proceedings is sent to the parties. 
Stranki sta o tem obveščeni, ko jima je poslano uradno obvestilo o rokih postopka ugovora.
If necessary, the admissibility issue will be dealt with in the decision on the opposition. 
Vprašanje dopustnosti se po potrebi obravnava v odločbi o ugovoru.
2.4.1 Absolute admissibility requirements 
Absolutne zahteve za dopustnost
Absolute admissibility deficiencies can only be remedied on the opponent's initiative during the 3-month opposition period; otherwise the opposition is inadmissible. 
Absolutne pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z dopustnostjo je mogoče odpraviti le na pobudo vložnika ugovora v trimesečnem roku za ugovor, sicer je ugovor nedopusten.
2.4.1.1 Identification of the contested EUTM application 
Opredelitev izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU
Article 2(2)(a) and Article 5(3) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2)(a) in člen 5(3) Delegirane uredbe
The mandatory elements for identifying the contested EUTM application are the application number and the name of the applicant. 
Obvezna elementa za opredelitev izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU sta številka prijave in ime prijavitelja.
If, for example, the application number indicated does not correspond to the name of the applicant indicated, the Office will decide if it can be established without any doubt which is the contested EUTM application. 
Če se na primer navedena številka prijave ne ujema z navedenim imenom prijavitelja, bo Urad odločil, ali je mogoče brez kakršnega koli dvoma ugotoviti, katera je izpodbijana prijava blagovne znamke EU.
If the applicant's name is not indicated, it can be found in the Office's IT system. 
Če ime prijavitelja ni navedeno, ga je mogoče poiskati v informacijskem sistemu Urada.
The date of publication is an optional indication that helps to double-check the identification of the EUTM application. 
Datum objave je neobvezna navedba in omogoča dvojno preverjanje opredelitve prijave blagovne znamke EU.
Even if it is missing, the EUTM application can be sufficiently identified through the other indications. 
Tudi če ta manjka, lahko za opredelitev prijave blagovne znamke EU zadostujejo druge navedbe.
Only one EUTM application can be contested in one notice of opposition. 
V enem ugovoru je mogoče izpodbijati samo eno prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
2.4.1.2 Identification of earlier marks or rights 
Opredelitev prejšnjih znamk ali pravic
Article 8(2) EUTMR 
Člen 8(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 2(2)(b) and Article 5(3) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2)(b) in člen 5(3) Delegirane uredbe
Invoked rights that are not earlier 
Uveljavljane pravice, ki niso prejšnje
Articles 8(2) and 46(1) EUTMR 
Člen 8(2) in člen 46(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Sometimes an opposition is based on one or more marks or other rights that are not earlier than the EUTM application. 
Včasih ugovor temelji na eni ali več znamkah ali drugih pravicah, ki niso prejšnje glede na prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
Whether at least one of the rights invoked is earlier is established at the admissibility stage. 
Ali je vsaj ena od pravic, ki se uveljavlja, prejšnja, se opredeli v fazi preizkusa dopustnosti.
For an invoked right to be earlier it must have, in the absence of any priority, an application date that is prior to the day on which the contested EUTM application was filed. 
Da bi bila pravica, ki se uveljavlja, prejšnja, mora biti datum njene prijave - brez katere koli prednostne pravice - pred datumom, ko je bila vložena izpodbijana prijava blagovne znamke EU.