natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Within the visual comparison it is important to note first that the public perceives word elements of a mark in a different way from other elements. 
V okviru vizualne primerjave je treba najprej poudariti, da javnost besedne elemente znamke zaznava drugače kot druge elemente.
Word elements can be read or associated with a sequence of letters. 
Besedne elemente je mogoče prebrati ali jih povezati z zaporedjem črk.
Other elements are just assessed as to their graphical or figurative characteristics. 
Drugi elementi se presodijo le glede na njihove grafične ali figurativne značilnosti.
In the following, the principles of visual comparison will be presented depending on the type of trade marks involved. 
V nadaljevanju so navedena načela vizualne primerjave, in sicer po vrstah zadevnih blagovnih znamk.
3.4.1.1 Word mark versus word mark 
Besedna znamka proti besedni znamki
When at least one word mark is involved, the word as such is protected, not its written form. 
V primeru vsaj ene besedne znamke je zaščitena beseda kot taka in ne njena pisna oblika.
According to the case-law, a word mark is a mark consisting entirely of letters, of words or of associations of words, written in printed characters in normal font, without any specific graphic element (20/04/2005, T211/03, Faber, EU:T:2005:135, § 33; 13/02/2007, T353/04, Curon, EU:T:2007:47, § 74). 
V skladu s sodno prakso je besedna znamka tista znamka, ki je sestavljena izključno iz črk, besed ali besednih zvez, napisanih s tiskanimi črkami v običajni pisavi, brez posebnega grafičnega elementa (20/04/2005, T211/03, Faber, EU:T:2005:135, § 33; 13/02/2007, T353/04, Curon, EU:T:2007:47, § 74).
The protection offered by the registration of a word mark applies to the word stated in the application for registration and not to the individual graphic or stylistic characteristics which that mark might possess (22/05/2008, T254/06, RadioCom, EU:T:2008:165, § 43). 
Varstvo, ki izhaja iz registracije besedne znamke, se nanaša na besedo, navedeno v prijavi za registracijo, in ne na posamezne grafične ali stilistične značilnosti, ki bi jih ta znamka lahko imela (22/05/2008, T254/06, RadioCom, EU:T:2008:165, § 43).
Therefore, it is irrelevant whether the word mark is depicted in lower or upper case letters. 
Zato ni pomembno, ali je besedna znamka prikazana z malimi ali velikimi črkami.
For word marks, the visual comparison is based on an analysis of the number and sequence of the letters/characters, the position of the coinciding letters/characters, the number of words and the structure of the signs (e.g. whether word elements are separated or hyphenated). 
Vizualna primerjava pri besednih znamkah temelji na analizi števila in zaporedja črk/znakov, položaja ujemajočih se črk/znakov, števila besed in strukture znakov (npr. ali so besedni elementi ločeni ali pisani z vezajem).
However, the average consumer normally perceives a sign as a whole and does not proceed to analyse its various details. 
Vendar povprečni potrošnik navadno zaznava znak kot celoto in ne preverja posameznih podrobnosti.
Therefore, small differences in the (number of) letters are often not sufficient to exclude a finding of visual similarity, particularly when the signs have a common structure. 
Zato majhne razlike v črkah (številu črk) pogosto ne zadostujejo za izključitev ugotovitve vizualne podobnosti, zlasti kadar imajo znaki enako strukturo.
In the following cases the marks were held to be visually similar. 
V naslednjih primerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da so si znamke vizualno podobne.
The following word marks are visually dissimilar. 
Naslednji besedni znamki se vizualno razlikujeta.
3.4.1.2 Word mark versus figurative mark with word elements 
Besedna znamka proti figurativni znamki z besednimi elementi
When figurative marks with word elements and word marks are compared visually, what matters is whether the signs share a significant number of letters in the same position and whether the word element in the figurative sign is highly stylised. 
Pri vizualni primerjavi figurativne znamke z besednimi elementi in besedne znamke je pomembno, ali je znakoma skupno precejšnje število črk na istem mestu in ali je besedni element v figurativnem znaku močno stiliziran.
Similarity may be found despite the fact that the letters are graphically portrayed in different typefaces, in italics or bold, in upper or lower case or in colour. 
Podobnost se lahko ugotovi kljub dejstvu, da so črke grafično prikazane v različnih pisavah, poševnem ali krepkem tisku, z velikimi ali malimi črkami ali v barvi.
In principle, when the same letters are depicted in the same sequence, any variation in stylisation has to be high in order to find visual dissimilarity. 
Kadar se iste črke pojavijo v enakem zaporedju, mora biti razlika pri stilizaciji načeloma velika, da se lahko ugotovi vizualna različnost.
The following marks were considered visually similar because there was no high variation in the stylisation of the word elements in the figurative marks and the word element was easily recognisable and legible. 
Naslednje znamke so se štele za vizualno podobne, ker pri stilizaciji besednih elementov v figurativnih znamkah ni bilo velike razlike ter je bil besedni element zlahka razpoznaven in berljiv.
However, where the word in the figurative mark is highly stylised, the marks should be found visually dissimilar, as in the following examples. 
Kadar je beseda v figurativni znamki močno stilizirana, je treba ugotoviti, da se znamki vizualno razlikujeta, kot je to prikazano v naslednjih primerih.
3.4.1.3 Purely figurative versus purely figurative signs 
Povsem figurativni znak proti povsem figurativnemu znaku
When comparing signs in conflict in terms of their purely figurative elements, the Office considers the latter as images: if they match in one, separately recognisable, element or have the same or a similar contour, it is likely that some visual similarity will be found. 
Urad pri primerjavi sovpadajočih znakov v smislu njunih povsem figurativnih elementov zadnjenavedene šteje za slike: če se ujemata v enem, ločeno prepoznavnem elementu ali imata enak ali podoben obris, bo verjetno ugotovljena določena vizualna podobnost.
The following purely figurative signs were found to be visually similar. 
Za naslednje povsem figurativne znake je bilo ugotovljeno, da so si vizualno podobni.
The following purely figurative signs were deemed to be visually dissimilar. 
Za naslednja povsem figurativna znaka se je štelo, da se vizualno razlikujeta.
3.4.1.4 Stylised mark versus stylised mark 
Stilizirana znamka proti stilizirani znamki
When comparing signs in terms of their word elements, the Office considers signs similar insofar as they share a significant number of letters in the same position and when they are not highly stylised or when they are stylised in the same or a similar manner. 
Urad pri primerjavi znakov v smislu njunih besednih elementov ta znaka šteje za podobna, če jima je skupno precejšnje število črk na istem mestu in če nista močno stilizirana ali če sta stilizirana enako ali podobno.
Similarity may be found despite the fact that the letters are graphically portrayed in different typefaces, in italics or bold, in upper or lower case or in colour (18/06/2009, T418/07, LiBRO, EU:T:2009:208; 15/11/2011, T434/10, Alpine Pro Sportswear & Equipment, EU:T:2011:663; 29/11/2012, C42/12 P, Alpine Pro Sportswear & Equipment, EU:C:2012:765, appeal dismissed). 
Podobnost se lahko ugotovi kljub dejstvu, da so črke grafično prikazane v različnih pisavah, poševnem ali krepkem tisku, z velikimi ali malimi črkami ali v barvi (18/06/2009, T418/07, LiBRO, EU:T:2009:208; 15/11/2011, T434/10, Alpine Pro Sportswear & Equipment, EU:T:2011:663; 29/11/2012, C42/12 P, Alpine Pro Sportswear & Equipment, EU:C:2012:765, pritožba zavrnjena).
In the following examples, the marks were considered visually similar because they share some words or sequences of letters and the typeface was deemed not to be highly stylised. 
V naslednjih primerih so se znamke štele za vizualno podobne, ker so jim skupne nekatere besede ali zaporedja črk in ker se pisava ni štela za močno stilizirano.
In the following examples, however, the marks were considered visually dissimilar in spite of the fact that they shared some words and/or letters and/or figurative devices, because the shared letters are highly stylised, placed differently and/or there are additional figurative devices. 
V naslednjih primerih pa se je štelo, da se znamke vizualno razlikujejo, čeprav so jim skupne nekatere besede in/ali črke in/ali figurativni elementi, ker so skupne črke močno stilizirane, drugače postavljene in/ali ker obstajajo dodatni figurativni elementi.
When comparing figurative signs with word elements visually, it is still possible to find visual similarity when the figurative elements are different (i.e. they do not match or have the same or similar contours) and the word elements are different. 
Pri vizualni primerjavi figurativnih znakov z besednimi elementi je mogoče vizualno podobnost ugotoviti tudi, kadar znaki vsebujejo različne figurativne elemente (tj. kadar se ti ne ujemajo ali nimajo enakega ali podobnega obrisa) in različne besedne elemente.
Similarity will be found when the overall stylisation, structure and colour combination render the signs visually similar overall. 
Podobnost bo ugotovljena, kadar sta si znaka zaradi celotne stilizacije, strukture in barvne kombinacije na splošno vizualno podobna.
The following example illustrates how similar structure, stylisation and colour combination render signs visually similar. 
Naslednji primer ponazarja, kako sta si znaka zaradi podobne strukture, stilizacije in barvne kombinacije vizualno podobna.
3.4.1.5 Word/figurative sign versus figurative sign 
Besedno-figurativni znak proti figurativnemu znaku
A coincidence in a figurative element that is visually perceived in an identical or similar way may lead to a visual similarity. 
Ujemanje v figurativnem elementu, ki se vizualno zaznava enako ali podobno, lahko vodi do vizualne podobnosti.
The following examples are cases where there are visual similarities because of matching figurative elements. 
V naslednjih primerih obstaja vizualna podobnost zaradi ujemajočih se figurativnih elementov.
In the following example the figurative elements were different and the signs were considered visually dissimilar. 
V naslednjem primeru sta bila figurativna elementa različna, zato se je štelo, da se znaka vizualno razlikujeta.
3.4.1.6 Signs consisting of a single letter 
Znaki, sestavljeni iz ene same črke
In cases of conflicting signs consisting of the same single letter, the visual comparison is of decisive importance, these signs being phonetically and usually also conceptually identical. 
V primerih sovpadajočih znakov, sestavljenih iz ene same črke, je odločilna vizualna primerjava, saj so ti znaki zvočno in običajno tudi pojmovno enaki.
The fact that the conflicting signs comprise the same single letter can lead to a finding of visual similarity between them, depending on the particular way the letters are depicted. 
Ker sta sovpadajoča znaka sestavljena iz ene same iste črke, se lahko ugotovi, da sta vizualno podobna, odvisno od načina, kako je črka prikazana.
In the following examples, the signs were found to be visually similar to a high or medium degree. 
V naslednjih primerih je bila ugotovljena visoka ali srednja stopnja podobnosti med znakoma.
In the following cases, the signs were found to be visually similar to a low degree (that resulted, depending on a particular case, both in likelihood of confusion and no likelihood of confusion). 
V naslednjih primerih je bila ugotovljena nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti (zaradi česar je ali pa ni obstajala verjetnost zmede, odvisno od primera).
Finally, in the examples below the signs were found to be visually dissimilar due to the different stylisations or graphic elements of the single-letter signs. 
Zadnja možnost je, da sta znaka zaradi različne stilizacije ali grafičnih elementov ugotovljena kot vizualno različna, kot v spodnjih primerih.
The final outcomes of these cases were those of no likelihood of confusion. 
Končni izid teh zadev je bil, da ne obstaja verjetnost zmede.
It should be pointed out that the verbal representation of ‘one-letter/one-digit sign' is not to be considered equivalent to the sign (e.g. ‘ONE' is not equal to ‘1' or ‘EM' to ‘M'). 
Treba je opozoriti, da se prikaza „znaka iz ene črke/ene števke“ z besedo ne sme šteti za enakovrednega znaku (npr. beseda „ONE“ ni enakovredna številki „1“ ali beseda „EM“ ni enakovredna „M“).
Therefore, the aforementioned arguments are not directly applicable to such cases. 
Zato se zgoraj navedene utemeljitve ne morejo neposredno uporabljati za takšne primere.
Finally, it must be noted that the above considerations also apply to signs consisting of single numbers. 
Nazadnje, treba je poudariti, da zgoraj navedeno velja tudi za znake, sestavljene iz ene same številke.
3.4.1.7 Three-dimensional marks 
Tridimenzionalne znamke
When comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional signs, the same basic principles as for two-dimensional marks are to be applied. 
Pri primerjavi tridimenzionalnih in dvodimenzionalnih znakov veljajo enaka osnovna načela kot za dvodimenzionalne znamke.
Although the comparative rarity of the three-dimensional sign will usually particularly affect the visual impact of the sign, this must be considered in relation to the overall impression. 
Čeprav bo razmeroma redek pojav tridimenzionalnega znaka običajno vplival zlasti na vizualni učinek znaka, je treba to upoštevati pri celotnem vtisu.
In contrast, there is a low degree of visual similarity between the following marks. 
Pri naslednjih znamkah pa je v nasprotju s prejšnjimi primeri nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti.
The following marks are visually dissimilar. 
Naslednji znamki se vizualno razlikujeta.
3.4.2 Phonetic comparison 
Zvočna primerjava
When the opposition is based on earlier signs that enjoy protection in different EU Member States, in principle, account must be taken of all the different pronunciations of the signs by the relevant public in all official languages of those Member States. 
Kadar ugovor temelji na prejšnjih znakih, ki so zaščiteni v različnih državah članicah EU, je treba načeloma upoštevati vse različne izgovarjave znakov, kot jih izgovarja upoštevna javnost, v vseh uradnih jezikih zadevnih držav članic.
Local accents are not taken into account. 
Lokalni naglasi se ne upoštevajo.
Nevertheless, as already mentioned, when the earlier mark is an EUTM registration, the analysis must in principle extend to the whole EU. 
Če pa je prejšnja znamka, kot je bilo že navedeno, registrirana blagovna znamka EU, je treba pri analizi načeloma zajeti celotno EU.
However, where there is a likelihood of confusion for a part of the EU and it is justifiable for reasons of economy of procedure (such as to avoid examining specific pronunciations or meanings of marks in several languages), the Office's analysis need not extend to the whole EU but may instead focus on only a part or parts where there is a likelihood of confusion. 
Vendar kadar obstaja verjetnost zmede v delu EU in kadar je to upravičeno zaradi ekonomičnosti postopka (da se izognemo preizkušanju posebnih izgovarjav ali pomenov znamk v več jezikih), Uradu pri analizi ni treba zajeti celotne EU, ampak se lahko osredotoči samo na del ali dele, kjer obstaja verjetnost zmede.
The overall phonetic impression produced by a sign is particularly influenced by the number and sequence of its syllables. 
Na celotni zvočni vtis, ki ga ustvarja znak, zlasti vplivata število in zaporedje njegovih zlogov.
The common rhythm and intonation of signs play an important role in how signs are perceived phonetically. 
Običajni ritem in intonacija znakov imata pomembno vlogo pri tem, kako se znaki zaznavajo zvočno.
The Collins English Dictionary defines ‘rhythm' as ‘the arrangement of words into a more or less regular sequence of stressed and unstressed or long and short syllables'. 
V Collinsovem angleškem slovarju je „ritem“ opredeljen kot razporeditev besed v bolj ali manj redno zaporedje poudarjenih in nepoudarjenih ali dolgih in kratkih zlogov.
‘Intonation' is defined as ‘the sound pattern of phrases and sentences produced by pitch variation in the voice'. 
„Intonacija“ je opredeljena kot zvočni vzorec besednih zvez in stavkov, ki nastaja s spreminjanjem višine tona v glasu.
Therefore, the key elements for determining the overall phonetic impression of a trade mark are the syllables and their particular sequence and stress. 
Ključni elementi za določitev celotnega zvočnega vtisa blagovne znamke so torej zlogi ter njihovo posebno zaporedje in poudarek.
The assessment of common syllables is particularly important when comparing marks phonetically, as a similar overall phonetic impression will be determined mostly by those common syllables and their identical or similar combination. 
Presoja skupnih zlogov je zlasti pomembna, kadar se znamke primerjajo na zvočni ravni, saj bo podobnost celotnega zvočnega vtisa odvisna predvsem od teh skupnih zlogov in njihove enake ali podobne kombinacije.
The following are examples of phonetically dissimilar marks. 
V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri znamk, ki se zvočno razlikujejo.
The following are examples of phonetically similar/identical marks. 
V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri zvočno podobnih/enakih znamk.
3.4.2.1 Signs and elements in signs that must be assessed 
Znaki in elementi v znakih, ki jih je treba presoditi
The Office conducts a phonetic comparison when both trade marks can be pronounced or have a sound. 
Urad opravi zvočno primerjavo, kadar je obe blagovni znamki mogoče izgovoriti oziroma imata zvok.
Accordingly, a figurative mark without word elements cannot, by definition, be pronounced. 
Figurativne znamke, ki nima besednih elementov, ni mogoče izgovoriti.
At the very most, its visual or conceptual content can be described orally. 
V najboljšem primeru se lahko ustno opiše njena vizualna ali pojmovna vsebina.
In other words, purely figurative marks (i.e. those not containing any word element) are not subject to a phonetic assessment. 
Z drugimi besedami, pri povsem figurativnih znamkah (tj. znamkah, ki ne vsebujejo besednega elementa), zvočna presoja ni potrebna.
The ‘meaning' that the image evokes, or its ‘description', will be assessed visually and conceptually. 
Pomen, ki ga izraža slika, oziroma njen opis se presodi vizualno in pojmovno.
In this respect, the Office follows the case-law established by the judgments of 07/02/2012, T424/10, Éléphants dans un rectangle, EU:T:2012:58, § 46; 08/10/2014, T342/12, Star, EU:T:2014:858, § 48; 30/09/2015, T364/13, KAJMAN / Device of a crocodile et al., EU:T:2015:738, § 46; 25/11/2015, T320/14, Device of two wavy black lines (fig.) / Device of wavy black link (fig.), EU:T:2015:882, § 45-46. 
V tem pogledu Urad sledi sodni praksi, ki se je oblikovala s sodbami z dne 07/02/2012, T424/10, Éléphants dans un rectangle, EU:T:2012:58, § 46; 08/10/2014, T342/12, Star, EU:T:2014:858, § 48; z dne 30/09/2015, T364/13, KAJMAN / Device of a crocodile et al., EU:T:2015:738, § 46; z dne 25/11/2015, T320/14, Device of two wavy black lines (fig.) / Device of wavy black link (fig.), EU:T:2015:882, § 45-46.
The contrary position taken by the Court in the judgment of 07/05/2015, T599/13, GELENKGOLD / FORM EINES TIGERS et al., EU:T:2015:262, § 65 cannot be considered as a prevailing trend until clarification is given by the Court of Justice. 
Nasprotno stališče, ki ga je Sodišče zavzelo v sodbi z dne 07/05/2015, T599/13, GELENKGOLD / FORM EINES TIGERS et al., EU:T:2015:262, § 65, se ne more šteti kot prevladujoči trend, dokler Sodišče ne poda pojasnila.
In its decision of 09/07/2015, R 863/2011G, Malta Cross + International + Foundation (fig.) / Malteserkreuz (fig.), § 49, the Grand Board of Appeal excluded the possibility of a direct (pronunciation-based) phonetic comparison of figurative elements. 
Veliki odbor za pritožbe je v odločbi z dne 09/07/2015, R 863/2011G, Malta Cross + International + Foundation (fig.) / Malteserkreuz (fig.), § 49, izključil možnost neposredne zvočne primerjave figurativnih elementov (na podlagi izgovarjave).
The Office does not undertake an indirect phonetic comparison, based on the description or a meaning attributed to the image by the public, given that in most cases, it is difficult to define which description the public will attribute to a figurative element and that the comparison based on such a description would lead to a subjective and arbitrary outcome. 
Urad ne opravlja posrednih zvočnih primerjav na podlagi opisa ali pomena, ki ga sliki pripisuje javnost, saj je v večini primerov težko opredeliti, kateri opis bo javnost pripisala figurativnemu elementu, zaradi primerjave, ki bi temeljila na takem opisu, pa bi bil izid zadeve subjektiven in arbitraren.
Furthermore, if the phonetic comparison is based on a description of a figurative element or on its meaning, it will only repeat the outcome of the visual or conceptual comparison respectively, where these elements have already been assessed. 
Če zvočna primerjava temelji na opisu ali pomenu figurativnega elementa, poleg tega samo ponavlja izid vizualne oziroma pojmovne primerjave, čeprav so bili ti elementi že predmet presoje.
The following are examples of where no phonetic comparison could be made because the marks are purely figurative. 
V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri, pri katerih zvočna primerjava ni bila mogoča, ker so znamke povsem figurativne.
Furthermore, when one of the signs has elements that can be read and the other has only figurative elements, the two signs cannot be phonetically compared directly, as in the following examples. 
Kadar ima eden od znakov elemente, ki jih je mogoče prebrati, drugi pa le figurativne elemente, znakov ni mogoče neposredno zvočno primerjati, kot je prikazano v naslednjih primerih.
With regard to the pronunciation of figurative elements reminiscent of a letter, it should be noted that the relevant public will tend to read these figurative elements only when they are linked to or form part of a word known to the relevant public, such as in the following examples. 
V zvezi z izgovarjavo figurativnih elementov, ki spominjajo na črko, je treba poudariti, da bo upoštevna javnost takšne figurativne elemente navadno prebrala samo, če so povezani z besedo ali če so del besede, ki je upoštevni javnosti znana, kot je to prikazano v naslednjih primerih.
In the following case, however, the figurative element will not be recognised and read as ‘X' and the contested sign read as ‘be light'. 
V naslednjem primeru figurativni element ne bo prepoznan in prebran kot „X“, izpodbijani znak pa bo prebran kot „be light“.
As a general rule, all word elements (including letters and numbers) are subject to the phonetic comparison. 
Praviloma se zvočno primerjajo vsi besedni elementi (vključno s črkami in številkami).
It may be the case, however, that the relevant public refers aurally to a sign by some elements and omits some words/letters. 
Možno pa je, da se upoštevna javnost zvočno sklicuje na znak le z nekaterimi elementi, druge besede ali črke pa izpusti.
For example, in its judgment of 03/07/2013, T206/12, LIBERTE american blend, EU:T:2013:342, the Court found that the public will not pronounce the words ‘american blend' due to their descriptive character. 
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 03/07/2013, T206/12, LIBERTE american blend, EU:T:2013:342, na primer ugotovilo, da javnost ne bo izgovorila besed „american blend“, ker sta opisni.
In its judgment of 03/06/2015, in joined cases T544/12, PENSA PHARMA, EU:T:2015:355 and T546/12, pensa, EU:T:2015:355, the Court stated that consumers would not pronounce the word ‘pharma', inasmuch as that word was superfluous because of the nature of the goods and services at issue. 
V sodbi z dne 03/06/2015 v združenih zadevah T544/12, PENSA PHARMA, EU:T:2015:355 in T546/12, pensa, EU:T:2015:355 je navedlo, da potrošniki ne bi izgovorili besede „pharma“, saj ta beseda zaradi vrste zadevnega blaga in storitev ni potrebna.