natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the Office finds that the fee has not been paid, it will invite the applicant to pay it within a given time limit. 
Če Urad ugotovi, da pristojbina ni bila plačana, bo vložnika zahteve pozval, naj jo plača v določenem roku.
If the required fee is not paid within the time limit, the Office will inform the applicant that the application for cancellation is deemed not to have been filed. 
Če zahtevana pristojbina ni plačana v roku, bo Urad vložnika zahteve obvestil, da se zahteva za izbris ne šteje za vloženo.
If the fee is paid, but after the specified time limit, it will be refunded to the applicant. 
Če je bila pristojbina plačana, vendar po preteku določenega roka, bo vložniku povrnjena.
In cases where the fee is received after the expiry of the time limit specified by the Office but the applicant provides proof that, within the time limit, it duly gave an order to a banking establishment to transfer the amount of the payment in a Member State, Article 180(3) EUTMR will be applied, including the payment of a surcharge where applicable (see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 3, Payment of Fees, Costs and Charges). 
Če Urad prejme pristojbino po preteku določenega roka zapadlosti, vendar vložnik zahteve dokaže, da je pred pretekom roka bančni ustanovi v državi članici ustrezno predložil nalog za nakazilo zneska plačila, se uporabi člen 180(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, to velja tudi za morebitno plačilo doplačila (glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 3: Plačilo pristojbin, stroškov in taks).
The filing date of an application for cancellation is not affected by the date of payment of the fee, since Article 63(2) EUTMR does not establish any consequence as regards the filing date of the application. 
Datum plačila pristojbine ne vpliva na datum vložitve zahteve za izbris, saj v členu 63(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU niso predvidene nobene posledice v zvezi z datumom vložitve zahteve.
When the fee is paid before the expiry of the time limit specified by Article 15(1) EUTMDR, the application is deemed to have been filed and the filing date will be that on which the written statement was received by the Office. 
Pri plačilu pristojbine pred pretekom roka, opredeljenega v členu 15(1) Delegirane uredbe, se šteje, da je bila zahteva vložena, pri čemer se bo kot datum vložitve uporabljal tisti, na katerega je Urad prejel pisno izjavo.
As a general principle, the cancellation fee is an application fee due for the filing of the application regardless of the outcome of the proceedings. 
Pristojbina za izbris je načeloma enaka pristojbini za prijavo, ki jo je treba plačati za vložitev prijave, ne glede na izid postopka.
Therefore, it will not be refunded in cases of inadmissibility. 
Zato se v primerih nedopustnosti ne povrne.
Neither will the cancellation fee be refunded in cases where the application for cancellation is withdrawn at any stage. 
Pristojbina za izbris se ne povrne niti, če se zahteva za izbris umakne na kateri koli stopnji postopka.
In this context, the only provisions that envisage the refund of the cancellation fee are Article 15(1) EUTMDR, applicable only in cases where the application is deemed not to have been filed as a result of a late payment, and Article 18(2) EUTMDR, which, applying Article 9(4) EUTMDR mutatis mutandis, envisages a refund of 50 % of the cancellation fee in the event of multiple applications, provided that the proceedings were suspended before the commencement of the adversarial part of the proceedings. 
Glede na navedeno sta edini določbi, ki predvidevata vračilo pristojbine za izbris, člen 15(1) Delegirane uredbe, ki se uporablja samo, kadar se zaradi poznega plačila šteje, da zahteva ni bila vložena, in člen 18(2) Delegirane uredbe, ki - ob smiselni uporabi člena 9(4) Delegirane uredbe - predvideva povračilo 50 % pristojbine za izbris v primeru več zahtev, če je bil postopek prekinjen pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka.
However, in the event of the withdrawal of the application for cancellation where the declaration of withdrawal reaches the Office on the same day as the original application, the fee will be refunded. 
Vendar se v primeru umika zahteve za izbris pristojbina povrne, če Urad izjavo o umiku prejme isti dan kot prvotno zahtevo.
2.4 Languages and translation of the application for cancellation 
Jeziki in prevod zahteve za izbris
2.4.1 Language of the proceedings 
Jezik postopka
Article 146(5) to (7) EUTMR 
Člen 146(5) do (7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 15(2) and (3) EUTMDR 
Člen 15(2) in (3) Delegirane uredbe
The application for revocation or invalidity must be filed in one of the five languages of the Office. 
Zahtevo za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti je treba vložiti v enem od petih uradnih jezikov Urada.
The rules regarding the language of proceedings are explained in detail in the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 4, Language of Proceedings. 
Pravila o jeziku postopka so podrobno pojasnjena v Smernicah, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 4: Jezik postopka.
According to these rules, in cancellation proceedings there are cases where the applicant has a choice between two possible languages of proceedings (the first and second languages of the contested mark, both being languages of the Office), and cases where there is only one possible language of proceedings (when the first language is not one of the five languages of the Office, the language of the cancellation proceedings can only be the second language of the contested mark). 
V skladu s temi pravili so lahko v postopku izbrisa primeri, v katerih lahko vložnik zahteve izbira med dvema možnima jezikoma postopka (prvim in drugim jezikom izpodbijane znamke, ki sta oba jezika Urada), in primeri, v katerih je le en možen jezik postopka (če prvi jezik ni eden od petih jezikov Urada, je lahko jezik postopka izbrisa samo drugi jezik izpodbijane znamke).
In cases where there is a choice, the language of proceedings will be that expressly indicated in the application for cancellation or, in the absence of an express indication, the language in which the application for cancellation was filed, in both cases provided that it is one of the possible languages of proceedings. 
V primerih, v katerih je mogoča izbira, bo jezik postopka jezik, ki je izrecno naveden v zahtevi za izbris, ali, če izrecne navedbe ni, jezik, v katerem je bila zahteva za izbris vložena, in sicer v obeh primerih pod pogojem, da je zadevni jezik eden od možnih jezikov postopka.
Where the wrong language of the proceedings has been chosen by the applicant, the EUTMR distinguishes between two different scenarios: where the incorrect language is a language of the Office, and where the incorrect language is one of the official languages of the European Union (but not of the Office). 
Če vložnik zahteve izbere napačen jezik postopka, se v Uredbi o blagovni znamki EU razlikuje med dvema primeroma: kadar je nepravilni jezik jezik Urada in kadar je nepravilni jezik eden od uradnih jezikov Evropske unije (ne pa eden od jezikov Urada).
Depending on which of the above applies, there are different consequences for the applicant and time limits to respect when choosing the correct language of the proceedings and submitting the translation of the application for cancellation. 
Odvisno od tega, za katerega od zgornjih primerov gre, obstajajo različne posledice za vložnika zahteve in roki, ki jih mora vložnik zahteve upoštevati pri izbiri ustreznega jezika postopka in predložitvi prevoda zahteve za izbris.
If the application has been filed in a language of the Office that is not one of the possible languages of the proceedings, of its own motion the applicant has to submit a translation of the application into the first language, provided that it is a language of the Office, or into the second language. 
Če je zahteva vložena v jeziku Urada, ki ni eden od možnih jezikov postopka, mora vložnik zahteve na svojo pobudo predložiti prevod zahteve v prvi jezik, če je ta jezik Urada, ali v drugi jezik.
The translation must be produced within 1 month of the filing date of the application for cancellation, failing which the application will be rejected as inadmissible (Article 146(7) EUTMR; Article 15(2) and (3) EUTMDR). 
Prevod je treba predložiti v enem mesecu od datuma vložitve zahteve za izbris, sicer bo zahteva zavržena kot nedopustna (člen 146(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, člen 15(2) in (3) Delegirane uredbe).
Article 15(4) EUTMDR, regarding the invitation to the applicant to remedy deficiencies, does not refer to Article 146(7) EUTMR; therefore, in these cases the Office will not send a deficiency letter, it will wait for 1 month from the filing date for the translation of the cancellation application to be submitted. 
Člen 15(4) Delegirane uredbe v zvezi s pozivom vložniku zahteve, naj odpravi pomanjkljivosti, se ne nanaša na člen 146(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, zato v teh primerih Urad ne bo poslal poziva za dopolnitev zahteve in bo po datumu vložitve počakal en mesec, da se predloži prevod zahteve za izbris.
If the language chosen by the applicant is not a language of the Office, the application will be rejected as inadmissible. 
Če jezik, ki ga izbere vložnik zahteve, ni jezik Urada, bo zahteva zavržena kot nedopustna.
Article 146(5) EUTMR applies, as it clearly specifies that the application for cancellation must be filed in a language of the Office. 
Uporablja se člen 146(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, saj je v njem jasno določeno, da je treba zahtevo za izbris vložiti v jeziku Urada.
As it has not been filed in a language of the Office, the 1month period to remedy the deficiency of Article 146(7) EUTMR does not apply. 
Če zahteva za izbris ni vložena v jeziku Urada, se enomesečni rok za odpravo pomanjkljivosti iz člena 146(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne uporablja.
In the event that the language chosen by the applicant is not one of the possible languages of the proceedings, any correspondence issued by the Office in the cancellation proceedings will be in the first language of the contested mark, providing that it is a language of the Office, or in the second language if the first one is not one of the five languages of the Office. 
Če jezik, ki ga izbere vložnik zahteve, ni eden od možnih jezikov postopka, bodo vsi dopisi, ki jih izda Urad v postopku izbrisa, v prvem jeziku izpodbijane blagovne znamke, če je ta jezik Urada, ali v drugem jeziku, če prvi jezik ni eden od petih jezikov Urada.
Concerning the use of official forms, Article 146(6) EUTMR states that when the form provided by the Office is used, it may be used in any official language of the European Union, provided that it is completed in one of the languages of the Office as far as textual elements are concerned. 
Kar zadeva uporabo uradnih obrazcev, je v členu 146(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določeno, da se v primeru uporabe obrazca Urada lahko obrazec uporabi v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije, če je, kar zadeva besedilne elemente, izpolnjen v enem od jezikov Urada.
Where the applicant uses the official form in a language that cannot be the language of the proceedings, all textual elements are in the wrong language and a language has been chosen that cannot be the language of the proceedings, the above principles apply: where the incorrect language chosen is a language of the Office, the applicant has 1 month to submit a translation on its own motion; where the incorrect language chosen is not a language of the Office, the deficiency cannot be remedied and the application will be deemed inadmissible. 
Če vložnik zahteve uporablja uradni obrazec v jeziku, ki ne more biti jezik postopka, so vsi besedilni elementi v napačnem jeziku in je bil izbran jezik, ki ne more biti jezik postopka, se uporabljajo zgornja načela: če je izbrani napačni jezik jezik Urada, mora vložnik zahteve v enem mesecu na svojo pobudo predložiti prevod, če izbrani napačni jezik ni jezik Urada, pomanjkljivosti ni mogoče odpraviti in zahteva se bo štela za nedopustno.
2.4.2 Translation of the evidence required for admissibility 
Prevod dokazov, ki se zahtevajo za dopustnost
Articles 15(4) and 16(2) EUTMDR 
Člen 15(4) in člen 16(2) Delegirane uredbe
Where evidence in support of the application is required to evaluate the admissibility of the case (e.g. the particulars of the earlier right on which the application is based), and this evidence is not in the language of the proceedings, or translated into that language, the Office will invite the applicant to remedy the deficiency pursuant to Article 15(4) EUTMDR (02/03/2007, R 300/20064, ACTILON / ACTELION (fig.)). 
Če se zahtevajo dokazi v podporo zahtevi za presojo dopustnosti zadeve (npr. podrobnosti o prejšnji pravici, na kateri temelji zahteva) in dokazi niso v jeziku postopka ali niso prevedeni v navedeni jezik, bo Urad v skladu s členom 15(4) Delegirane uredbe vložnika zahteve pozval, naj odpravi pomanjkljivost (02/03/2007, R 300/20064, ACTILON / ACTELION (fig.)).
If the deficiency is not remedied, the application for cancellation will be rejected as totally or partially inadmissible (Articles 15(4) and 16(2) EUTMDR). 
Če pomanjkljivost ni odpravljena, bo zahteva za izbris zavržena v celoti ali delno nedopustna (člen 15(4) in člen 16(2) Delegirane uredbe).
2.5 Admissibility check 
Preverjanje dopustnosti
Article 58 and Articles 60(4), 63(3) and 66(2) EUTMR 
Člen 58, člen 60(4), člen 63(3) in člen 66(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Articles 12, 15 and 16 EUTMDR 
Členi 12, 15 in 16 Delegirane uredbe
Once the Office has established that the corresponding fee has been duly paid, it checks the admissibility of the application. 
Ko Urad ugotovi, da je bila ustrezna pristojbina plačana v celoti, preveri dopustnost zahteve.
In contrast to opposition proceedings, there is no cooling-off period and the applicant has until the closure of the adversarial part of the proceedings to submit evidence for substantiation. 
V nasprotju s postopkom ugovora ni obdobja za pobotanje, vložnik zahteve pa mora dokaze za utemeljitev predložiti do konca kontradiktornega dela postopka.
This means, in particular, that in the case of an application for invalidity based on relative grounds, the proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of all the earlier rights and the evidence proving the applicant's entitlement to them have to be submitted. 
To pomeni zlasti, da je treba pri zahtevi za ugotovitev ničnosti na podlagi relativnih razlogov predložiti dokaz o obstoju, veljavnosti in obsegu varstva vseh prejšnjih pravic ter dokaze o pravici vložnika zahteve, da se sklicuje nanje.
These documents should preferably be submitted together with the application. 
Zaželeno je, da se ti dokumenti predložijo skupaj z zahtevo.
The admissibility check may result in the identification of absolute and/or relative admissibility deficiencies in the application. 
Med preverjanjem dopustnosti se lahko ugotovijo absolutne in/ali relativne pomanjkljivosti glede dopustnosti zahteve.
Absolute admissibility deficiencies are those that cannot be remedied by the applicant and will automatically lead to the application being considered inadmissible. 
Absolutne pomanjkljivosti glede dopustnosti so tiste, ki jih vložnik zahteve ne more odpraviti, zato se bo zahteva samodejno štela za nedopustno.
They are described in detail in paragraph 2.5.1 below. 
Podrobneje so opisane v odstavku 2.5.1 v nadaljevanju.
Relative admissibility deficiencies, however, are those that can in principle be remedied by the applicant. 
Relativne pomanjkljivosti glede dopustnosti so tiste, ki jih lahko vložnik zahteve načeloma odpravi.
They include non-compliance with one or more of the relative admissibility requirements contained in Article 12 EUTMDR (which are described in detail in paragraph 2.5.2 below). 
Med njimi so neskladnost z eno ali več relativnimi zahtevami glede dopustnosti, ki so zajete v členu 12 Delegirane uredbe (in so podrobneje opisane v odstavku 2.5.2 v nadaljevanju).
In these cases, in accordance with Article 15(4) EUTMDR, the Office will invite the applicant to remedy the deficiency within 2 months. 
V takšnih primerih bo Urad v skladu s členom 15(4) Delegirane uredbe vložnika zahteve pozval, naj pomanjkljivost odpravi v dveh mesecih.
Where one or more relative admissibility deficiencies have been found and they are not remedied within the specified time limit, a decision will be issued rejecting the application for cancellation as inadmissible. 
Kadar obstaja ena ali več relativnih pomanjkljivosti glede dopustnosti in te niso odpravljene v določenem roku, bo izdana odločba, s katero se zahteva za izbris zavrže kot nedopustna.
Any decision to reject an application for cancellation in its entirety as inadmissible will be communicated to the applicant and the proprietor of the EUTM (Article 15(5) EUTMDR) and can be appealed by the applicant. 
Vsaka odločba, s katero se zahteva za izbris v celoti zavrže kot nedopustna, bo poslana vložniku zahteve in imetniku blagovne znamke EU (člen 15(5) Delegirane uredbe), vložnik zahteve pa se lahko zoper njo pritoži.
However, if the result of the admissibility check is that the application is considered partially admissible (i.e. admissible for at least some of the grounds and/or earlier rights on which it is based), the proceedings will continue. 
Če pa se med preverjanjem dopustnosti pokaže, da se zahteva šteje za delno dopustno (tj. dopustno vsaj za nekatere razloge in/ali prejšnje pravice, na katerih temelji), se postopek nadaljuje.
If one of the parties disagrees with the result of the admissibility check, it can appeal against it together with the final decision terminating the proceedings (Article 66(2) EUTMR). 
Če se katera od strank ne strinja z rezultatom preverjanja dopustnosti, se lahko pritoži le v pritožbi zoper končno odločbo, s katero se postopek konča (člen 66(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
2.5.1 Absolute admissibility requirements 
Absolutne zahteve za dopustnost
Where an absolute admissibility deficiency is found, the Office will invite the applicant to comment on the inadmissibility within 2 months. 
Če Urad odkrije absolutno pomanjkljivost glede dopustnosti, bo vložnika zahteve pozval, naj v dveh mesecih predloži pripombe glede nedopustnosti.
If, after hearing the applicant, the Office still maintains that there is an absolute admissibility deficiency, a decision will be issued rejecting the application for cancellation as inadmissible. 
Če Urad po tem, ko se seznani z mnenjem vložnika zahteve, še vedno meni, da obstaja absolutna pomanjkljivost glede dopustnosti, bo izdal odločbo, v kateri zahtevo za izbris zavrže kot nedopustno.
This decision will be copied to the EUTM proprietor. 
Izvod te odločbe se pošlje imetniku blagovne znamke EU.
Contested mark is not yet registered 
Izpodbijana blagovna znamka še ni registrirana
The application is filed against an EUTM that has not yet been registered. 
Vložena zahteva se nanaša na blagovno znamko EU, ki še ni bila registrirana.
An application for cancellation can only be filed against a registered EUTM. 
Zahtevo za izbris je mogoče vložiti samo zoper registrirano blagovno znamko EU.
A request directed against an application that has not yet been registered is premature (22/10/2007, R 284/20074, VISION / VISION). 
Zahteva glede prijave, ki še ni bila registrirana, je prezgodnja (22/10/2007, R 284/20074, VISION / VISION).
Contested mark no longer exists 
Izpodbijana blagovna znamka ne obstaja več
The application is filed against an EUTM that no longer exists at the time of filing, since it has already been surrendered, has expired, or has been revoked or invalidated by a final decision. 
Vložena zahteva se nanaša na blagovno znamko EU, ki ob vložitvi ne obstaja več, ker je bila odpovedana, je potekla, je bila razveljavljena ali ugotovljena za nično s dokončno odločbo.
Res judicata 
Pravnomočna razsodba
Article 63(3) EUTMR 
Člen 63(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
There is a previous final decision by the Office or by a European Union trade mark court as referred to in Article 123 EUTMR on a cancellation application or counterclaim relating to the same subject matter and cause of action, and involving the same parties, which has been adjudicated on its merits, and the decision has acquired the authority of a final decision. 
Urad ali sodišče za blagovne znamke Evropske unije, kot je navedeno v členu 123 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, je že izdalo dokončno odločbo o zahtevi za izbris ali nasprotni tožbi, ki se je nanašala na isti predmet in pravno podlago ter je vključevala iste stranke ter je že vsebinsko odločilo o zahtevi oziroma nasprotni tožbi, odločba pa je postala pravnomočna.
For more details on this admissibility deficiency, see the corresponding section in the Guidelines, Part D, Cancellation, Section 2, Substantive Provisions, paragraph 5. 
Za več podrobnosti o tej pomanjkljivosti glede dopustnosti glej ustrezni razdelek v Smernicah, del D: Izbris, razdelek 2: Vsebinske določbe, odstavek 5.
New application invoking other rights that could have been invoked in support of the first application 
Nova zahteva, v kateri se vložnik zahteve sklicuje na druge pravice, na katere bi se lahko skliceval v podporo prvi zahtevi
Article 60(4) EUTMR 
Člen 60(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
In cases of invalidity based on relative grounds, where the applicant owns several earlier rights and has previously applied for the invalidity of the same EUTM (or made a counterclaim) on the basis of another of those earlier rights that could have been invoked in the previous application or counterclaim. 
V primerih ničnosti na podlagi relativnih razlogov, v katerih je vložnik zahteve imetnik več prejšnjih pravic in je že vložil zahtevo za ugotovitev ničnosti (to velja tudi za nasprotne tožbe) iste blagovne znamke EU na podlagi katere druge od teh prejšnjih pravic, na katere bi se lahko skliceval v prejšnji zahtevi ali nasprotni tožbi.
For more details on this admissibility deficiency, see the Guidelines, Part D, Cancellation, Section 2, Substantive Provisions, paragraph 4.5.2. 
Za več podrobnosti o tej pomanjkljivosti glede dopustnosti glej Smernice, del D: Izbris, razdelek 2: Vsebinske določbe, odstavek 4.5.2.
Revocation on non-use: the mark has been registered for less than 5 years 
Razveljavitev na podlagi neuporabe: blagovna znamka je registrirana manj kot pet let
Article 58 EUTMR 
Člen 58 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
An application for revocation based on non-use is filed against a trade mark that has not been registered for 5 years at the date of the application. 
Zahteva za razveljavitev na podlagi neuporabe se vloži v zvezi z blagovno znamko, ki na datum vložitve zahteve še ni registrirana pet let.
Application filed in the wrong language 
Zahteva, vložena v napačnem jeziku
Article 146(5) EUTMR 
Člen 146(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
An application for cancellation is filed without having used the official form, which is neither in the correct language as established in Article 146 EUTMR nor translated into that language within 1 month of the filing of the application for cancellation. 
Zahteva za izbris se ne vloži na uradnem obrazcu, niti ni napisana v ustreznem jeziku, kakor je določeno v členu 146 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, niti ni v ta jezik prevedena v enem mesecu po vložitvi zahteve za izbris.
For more detailed information, see paragraph 2.4 above. 
Za podrobnejše informacije glej odstavek 2.4 zgoraj.
Identification of the contested mark 
Opredelitev izpodbijane blagovne znamke
Article 12(1)(a) EUTMDR 
Člen 12(1)(a) Delegirane uredbe
An application for cancellation must contain the EUTM registration number in respect of which revocation or a declaration of invalidity is sought and the name of its proprietor. 
Zahteva za izbris mora vsebovati registracijsko številko blagovne znamke EU, za katero se je vložila zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti, in ime njenega imetnika.
For more details on this admissibility deficiency, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, paragraph 2.4.1.1, as the same explanations and reasoning apply to cancellation proceedings. 
Za več podrobnosti o tej pomanjkljivosti glede dopustnosti glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, odstavek 2.4.1.1, saj se ista pojasnila in argumenti uporabljajo tudi za postopek izbrisa.