natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court further ruled that, although the trade mark for which registration is sought may have been used as part of a registered trade mark or in conjunction with such a mark, the fact remains that, for the purposes of registration of the mark itself, the trade mark applicant must prove that that mark alone, as opposed to any other trade mark that may also be present, identifies the particular undertaking from which the goods originate (16/09/2015, C215/14, Nestlé KIT KAT, EU:C:2015:604, § 66; 24/02/2016, T411/14, Shape of a bottle (3D), EU:T:2016:94, § 76; 16/03/2016, T363/15, LAATIKON MUOTO (3D), EU:T:2016:149, § 51). 
Sodišče je odločilo še, da čeprav se je blagovna znamka, za katero se zahteva registracija, morda uporabljala kot del registrirane blagovne znamke ali v povezavi s tako znamko, ostaja dejstvo, da mora prijavitelj blagovne znamke za namene registracije znamke dokazati, da samo ta znamka, v nasprotju s katero koli drugo znamko, ki je lahko prav tako prisotna, identificira zadevno podjetje, iz katerega izhaja blago (16/09/2015, C215/14, Nestlé KIT KAT, EU:C:2015:604, § 66; 24/02/2016, T411/14, Shape of a bottle (3D), EU:T:2016:94, § 76; 16/03/2016, T363/15, LAATIKON MUOTO (3D), EU:T:2016:149, § 51).
Moreover, the Court has held on numerous occasions that advertising material on which a sign that is devoid of any distinctive character always appears with other marks that, by contrast, do have distinctive character does not constitute proof that the public perceives the sign applied for as a mark that indicates the commercial origin of the goods. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče večkrat odločilo, da reklamno gradivo, na katerem se znak, ki je brez slehernega razlikovalnega učinka, vedno pojavlja z drugimi znamkami, ki imajo v nasprotju z njim razlikovalni učinek, ni dokaz, da javnost znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, zaznava kot znamko, ki označuje trgovski izvor blaga.
For instance, the Court considered that the use of the sign ‘Gifflar' (which indicates a kind of bread in Swedish) on the packaging of pastries, together with the trade mark Pågen, was made in a descriptive context, not as a badge of origin (09/07/2014, T520/12, Gifflar, EU:T:2014:620, § 44-45). 
Sodišče je na primer menilo, da je uporaba znaka Gifflar (ki v švedščini označuje vrsto kruha) na embalaži peciva skupaj z blagovno znamko Pågen opisna in ni označba porekla (09/07/2014, T520/12, Gifflar, EU:T:2014:620, § 44-45).
The evidence should indicate when use commenced and should also show that the use was continuous or indicate reasons if there are gaps in the period of use. 
Dokazi morajo izkazovati, kdaj se je začela uporaba, in tudi, da je bila uporaba neprekinjena, ali pa morajo biti navedeni razlogi za vrzeli v obdobju uporabe.
As a general rule, long-standing use is likely to be an important persuasive element in establishing acquired distinctiveness. 
Splošno pravilo je, da bo dolgotrajna uporaba verjetno pomemben prepričevalni element pri ugotavljanju pridobljenega razlikovalnega učinka.
The longer customers and potential customers have been exposed to a mark the more likely they are to have made the connection between that mark and a single source in trade. 
Dlje ko so bili kupci in morebitni kupci izpostavljeni znamki, verjetneje je, da so ustvarili povezavo med znamko in enotnim virom v trgovini.
Considering, however, that length of use is only one of the factors to be taken into account, there may be situations where exceptions to the above rule are justified, in particular when other factors may also come into play that are capable of making up for a short length of use. 
Ker pa je trajanje uporabe samo eden od dejavnikov, ki jih je treba upoštevati, lahko nastanejo okoliščine, v katerih so izjeme od zgornjega pravila utemeljene, zlasti kadar obstajajo tudi drugi dejavniki, ki lahko nadomestijo kratko trajanje uporabe.
For example, where products or services are the subject of a major advertising launch and/or the sign applied for is a mere variant of a sign already in long use, it may be the case that acquired distinctiveness can be achieved quite quickly. 
Na primer, če so proizvodi ali storitve del začetka obsežnega oglaševanja in/ali je znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, samo različica znaka, ki se že dolgo uporablja, se lahko zgodi, da se lahko pridobljeni razlikovalni učinek doseže precej hitro.
This could be the case, for instance, where a new version of an existing and widely used computer-operating system is launched under a sign that essentially reproduces the structure and/or contents of the trade mark applied to previous versions of the product. 
Tako je lahko na primer, če se nova različica obstoječega in splošno uporabljanega računalniškega operacijskega sistema da na trg pod znakom, ki v bistvu vsebuje strukturo in/ali vsebino blagovne znamke, ki se je uporabljala za prejšnje različice proizvoda.
The trade mark for such a product would be capable of achieving widespread acquired distinctiveness within a fairly short period of time simply because all existing users will immediately be made aware that the sign applied for refers to the upgrading to the new version. 
Blagovna znamka za tak proizvod bi bila sposobna doseči obsežen pridobljeni razlikovalni učinek v dokaj kratkem času, saj bi se vsi obstoječi uporabniki takoj zavedli, da se znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, nanaša na nadgradnjo nove različice.
In the same vein, it is in the nature of certain major sporting, musical or cultural events that they take place at regular intervals and are known to have extremely wide appeal. 
Podobno je za določene glavne športne, glasbene ali kulturne dogodke značilno, da potekajo v rednih presledkih in so znani po tem, da pritegnejo obsežno publiko.
These major events are anticipated by millions, and the knowledge that the event is due on a particular date precedes the formal announcement of where it will take place. 
Teh pomembnih dogodkov se udeležijo milijoni ljudi, obvestilo o tem, da bo dogodek na določen datum, pa ima prednost pred uradno napovedjo kraja dogodka.
This circumstance creates intense interest in the nominated location of such events and in the announcement thereof (‘city/country+year' marks). 
Te okoliščine ustvarijo veliko zanimanje za predlagano lokacijo teh dogodkov in njihovo napoved (znamke „mesto/država + leto“).
It is therefore reasonable to suppose that the moment a particular event, tournament or games is announced as having been allocated to a particular city or country, it is likely to become known instantly to practically all relevant consumers with an interest in the sector concerned or to professionals in the sector. 
Zato je razumno domnevati, da bo napoved dodelitve nekega dogodka, turnirja ali tekme nekemu mestu ali državi verjetno takoj postala znana vsem upoštevnim potrošnikom, ki jih zanima zadevni sektor, ali strokovnjakom v sektorju.
This may thereby give rise to the possibility of very rapid acquired distinctiveness of a mark concerning a forthcoming event, in particular where the sign reproduces the structure of previously used trade marks with the result that the public immediately perceives the new event as a sequel to a series of well-established events. 
To lahko povzroči, da znamka, ki se nanaša na prihodnji dogodek, zelo hitro pridobi razlikovalni učinek, predvsem če znak vsebuje strukturo predhodno uporabljenih blagovnih znamk, rezultat tega pa je, da javnost novi dogodek takoj zazna kot nadaljevanje serije dobro uveljavljenih dogodkov.
The assessment of such rapid acquired distinctiveness will follow the general criteria regarding, for instance, extent of use, territory, relevant date or targeted public, as well as regarding the onus on the applicant to provide evidence thereof. 
Presoja tako hitro pridobljenega razlikovalnega učinka je v skladu s splošnimi merili, ki na primer zadevajo obseg uporabe, ozemlje, upoštevni datum ali ciljno javnost ter dolžnost prijavitelja, da zagotovi ustrezne dokaze.
The only particularity refers to length of use and the possibility that, under certain circumstances, the acquisition of acquired distinctiveness may occur very rapidly, or even instantaneously. 
Edina posebnost se nanaša na trajanje uporabe in možnost, da je lahko v določenih okoliščinah pridobitev razlikovalnega učinka zelo hitra ali celo takojšnja.
As under any other claim for acquired distinctiveness, it is for the applicant to demonstrate that the public is able to perceive the trade mark in question as a distinctive sign. 
Prijavitelj mora kot pri vsaki zahtevi za pridobljeni razlikovalni učinek dokazati, da lahko javnost zazna zadevno blagovno znamko kot razlikovalen znak.
8.7 Post-filing-date evidence 
Dokazi, predloženi po datumu vložitve
The evidence must show that, prior to the filing date, the trade mark had acquired distinctive character through use. 
Dokazi morajo izkazovati, da je blagovna znamka pred datumom vložitve prijave imela razlikovalni učinek, pridobljen z uporabo.
However, this does not preclude the possibility that account may be taken of evidence that, although subsequent to the filing date, enables conclusions to be drawn regarding the situation as it was on the filing date (19/06/2014, C217/13, Oberbank e.a., EU:C:2014:2012, § 60). 
To pa ne izključuje možnosti, da se upoštevajo tudi dejavniki, ki - čeprav se nanašajo na obdobje po vložitvi prijave za registracijo - omogočajo sklepanje o stanju, kakršno je bilo na datum vložitve prijave (19/06/2014, C217/13, Oberbank e.a., EU:C:2014:2012, § 60).
Therefore, evidence cannot be rejected merely because it post-dates the filing date. 
Dokazi se torej ne morejo zavrniti samo zato, ker so predloženi po datumu vložitve prijave.
Accordingly, such evidence must be assessed and given due weight. 
O teh dokazih je treba ustrezno presoditi in jih ustrezno upoštevati.
As an example, a trade mark that enjoys particularly relevant recognition on the market or a substantially relevant market share a few months after the filing date may have had acquired distinctiveness also on the filing date. 
Kot primer, blagovna znamka, ki uživa posebno pomembno prepoznavnost na trgu ali ima bistveno pomemben tržni delež nekaj mesecev po datumu vložitve, je lahko razlikovalni učinek pridobila na datum vložitve prijave.
9 Consequences of Acquired Distinctiveness 
Posledice pridobljenega razlikovalnega učinka
A trade mark registered in accordance with Article 7(3) EUTMR enjoys the same protection as any other trade mark that was found inherently registrable upon examination. 
Blagovna znamka, registrirana v skladu s členom 7(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, uživa enako varstvo kot katera koli druga blagovna znamka, za katero je bilo po preizkušanju ugotovljeno, da jo je mogoče registrirati.
If the EUTM application is accepted based on Article 7(3) EUTMR, this information is published in the EUTM Bulletin, using INID code 521. 
Če se prijava blagovne znamke EU sprejme na podlagi člena 7(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, se ta informacija objavi v Biltenu in uporabi koda INID 521.
Language Official language in the following Member States 
Jezik Uradni jezik v naslednjih državah članicah
German Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and Austria 
nemščina Belgija, Nemčija, Luksemburg in Avstrija
Greek Greece and Cyprus 
grščina Grčija in Ciper
English Ireland, Malta and the United Kingdom, 
angleščina Irska, Malta in Združeno kraljestvo
French Belgium, France and Luxembourg 
francoščina Belgija, Francija in Luksemburg
Dutch Belgium and Netherlands 
nizozemščina Belgija in Nizozemska
Swedish Finland and Sweden (09/07/2014, T520/12, Gifflar, upholding 18/09/2012, R 46/20122, GIFFLAR (fig.)) 
švedščina Finska in Švedska (09/07/2014, T520/12, Gifflar, ki je potrdila 18/09/2012, R 46/20122, GIFFLAR (fig.))
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part B, Examination Page 2 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del B, Preizkušanje stran 15
Absolute Grounds for Refusal - European Union Collective Marks 
Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev - Kolektivne znamke Evropske unije
CHAPTER 15 
POGLAVJE 15
EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE MARKS 
KOLEKTIVNE ZNAMKE EVROPSKE UNIJE
1 Character of Collective Marks 3 
1 Značilnosti kolektivnih znamk 3
1.1 Definition 3 
1.1 Opredelitev 3
1.3 Relationship with individual and certification marks 3 
1.3 Razmerje do individualnih in certifikacijskih znamk 3
1.4 Applicable provisions and examination 4 
1.4 Veljavne določbe in preizkušanje 4
2 Ownership 4 
2 Lastništvo 4
3 Specific Absolute Grounds of Refusal 5 
3 Posebni absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev 5
3.1 Misleading as to the character or meaning of the mark 5 
3.1 Zavajanje glede značaja ali pomena znamke 5
3.2 Regulations governing use 6 
3.2 Pravilnik o uporabi 6
3.2.1 Filing 6 
3.2.1 Predložitev 6
3.2.2 Content 6 
3.2.2 Vsebina 6
3.2.3 Compliance with public policy and morality 6 
3.2.3 Skladnost z javnim redom in moralo 6
3.2.4 Remedies 6 
3.2.4 Pravna sredstva 6
4 Specificities as Regards the General Absolute Grounds for Refusal 7 
4 Posebnosti v zvezi s splošnimi absolutnimi razlogi za zavrnitev 7
4.1 Descriptive signs and the ‘geographical derogation' 7 
4.1 Opisni znaki in „geografsko odstopanje“ 7
4.2 Objections raised under Article 7(1)(j), (k) or (l) EUTMR 8 
4.2 Ugovori na podlagi člena 7(1)(j), (k) ali (l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU 8
1 Character of Collective Marks 
Značilnosti kolektivnih znamk
Definition 
Opredelitev
A European Union collective mark (EU collective mark) is a specific kind of EUTM that, pursuant to Article 74(1) EUTMR, ‘is described as such when the mark is applied for and is capable of distinguishing the goods or services of the members of the association which is the proprietor of the mark from those of other undertakings'. 
Kolektivna znamka Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: kolektivna znamka EU) je posebna vrsta blagovne znamke EU, ki se v skladu s členom 74(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU „uporablja za in je sposobna razlikovati blago ali storitve članov združenja, ki je nosilec blagovne znamke, od blaga ali storitev drugih podjetij“.
It is one of the three kinds of marks set out in the Regulation, along with individual marks and certification marks. 
Skupaj s posameznimi znamkami in certifikacijskimi znamkami je ena od treh vrst znamk iz Uredbe.
An EU collective mark distinguishes the goods and services of the members of the association that owns the mark from those of other companies that do not belong to that association. 
Kolektivna znamka EU razlikuje blago in storitve članov združenja, ki je imetnik znamke, od blaga in storitev drugih podjetij, ki niso člani zadevnega združenja.
Therefore, the EU collective mark qualifies the commercial origin of certain goods and services by informing the consumer that the producer of the goods or the service provider belongs to a certain association and has the right to use the mark. 
Kolektivna znamka EU zato označuje trgovski izvor nekaterega blaga in storitev z obveščanjem potrošnikov, da je proizvajalec blaga ali ponudnik storitve član nekega združenja in ima pravico uporabljati znamko.
An EU collective mark is typically used by companies, together with their own individual marks, to indicate that they are members of a certain association. 
Kolektivno znamko EU običajno skupaj s svojimi individualnimi znamkami uporabljajo podjetja, da tako pokažejo, da so člani nekega združenja.
For example, Spain's Association of Shoe Manufacturers may want to apply for the collective mark ‘Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Calzado', which, while belonging to the association, is also going to be used by all its members. 
Na primer, špansko združenje proizvajalcev čevljev morda želi prijaviti kolektivno znamko Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Calzado, ki jo bodo uporabljali tudi vsi člani združenja, čeprav pripada združenju.
A member of the association may want to use the collective mark in addition to its own individual mark, which could be, for example, ‘Calzados Luis'. 
Član združenja bi morda rad uporabljal kolektivno znamko poleg svoje posamezne znamke, ki je lahko na primer Calzados Luis.
1.3 Relationship with individual and certification marks 
Razmerje do individualnih in certifikacijskih znamk
It is up to the applicant to decide whether the trade mark fulfils the requirements of a collective mark, as opposed to those of an individual mark or certification mark within the meaning of Article 83 EUMTR. 
Prijavitelj odloči, ali blagovna znamka izpolnjuje zahteve za kolektivno znamko, in ne za posamezno ali certifikacijsko znamko v smislu člena 83 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
This means that, in principle, the same sign applied for as an EU collective mark might also be applied for as an individual EUTM or EU certification mark, provided that the respective conditions of the EUTMR are met for each application. 
To pomeni, da se lahko načeloma za znak, za katerega je bila vložena prijava za kolektivno znamko EU, vloži tudi prijava za posamezno blagovno znamko EU ali certifikacijsko znamko EU, če so za posamezno prijavo izpolnjeni pogoji iz Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The three kinds of marks do not differ necessarily with respect to the signs per se but as regards other characteristics specific to each one of them, including, in particular, the requirements of ownership and the conditions of use of the mark. 
Te tri vrste znamk se ne razlikujejo nujno glede znakov, ampak glede drugih značilnosti, ki so specifične za vsako od njih, predvsem tudi glede zahtev za lastništvo in pogojev uporabe znamke.
However, an applicant should be aware of the fact that, in the event of having to subsequently demonstrate genuine use of the marks, it will probably be rather difficult to show use of the same sign for different kinds of marks. 
Vendar mora prijavitelj upoštevati, da bo verjetno precej težko dokazati uporabo istega znaka za različne znamke, če bo moral naknadno dokazati dejansko uporabo znamk.
For further information regarding genuine use of a mark in accordance with its function, please see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use, paragraph 2.3.1. 
Več informacij o dejanski uporabi znamke v skladu z njeno funkcijo je na voljo v Smernicah, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi, odstavek 2.3.1.
For example, an association can file an application for the word mark ‘Tamaki' either as an individual mark, a certification mark or a collective mark, depending on the mark's intended use (by the association itself or its members, or as a sign of guarantee of a characteristic or not). 
Združenje lahko na primer vloži prijavo za besedno znamko Tamaki kot posamezno znamko, certifikacijsko znamko ali kolektivno znamko, glede na predvideno uporabo znamke (ki jo uporablja združenje ali njegovi člani ali kot znak jamstva značilnosti).
If it is applied for as an EU collective mark, certain additional formalities must be met, such as the submission of regulations governing use (see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 2, Formalities, paragraph 8.2). 
Če se zanjo vloži prijava kot za kolektivno znamko EU, morajo biti izpolnjene nekatere dodatne formalnosti, kot je predložitev pravilnika o uporabi (glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 2: Formalnosti, odstavek 8.2).
After filing the application, changes to the kind of mark (between collective, certification and individual marks) are accepted only when it is obvious from the application that the wrong kind of mark has been selected (see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 2, Formalities, paragraph 8.4). 
Po vložitvi prijave se spremembe vrste znamke (med kolektivnimi, certifikacijskimi ali posameznimi znamkami) sprejmejo samo, če je iz prijave razvidno, da je bila izbrana napačna vrsta znamke (glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 2: Formalnosti, odstavek 8.4).
1.4 Applicable provisions and examination 
Veljavne določbe in preizkušanje
The EUTMR provisions apply to EU collective marks, unless Articles 75 to 82 EUTMR provide otherwise. 
Določbe Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se uporabljajo za kolektivne znamke EU, če členi 75 do 82 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne določajo drugače.
On the one hand, EU collective marks are therefore subject to the general EUTM regime and on the other hand, to some exceptions and particularities. 
Na eni strani tako za kolektivne znamke EU velja splošna ureditev za blagovne znamke EU, na drugi strani pa nekatere izjeme in posebnosti.
It follows, firstly, that an application for an EU collective mark is, in principle, subject to the same examination procedure and conditions as an application for an individual mark. 
Prvič, iz tega izhaja, da se za prijavo kolektivne znamke EU uporabljajo enak postopek preizkušanja in pogoji kot za prijavo posamezne znamke.
In general terms, the classification of goods and services, and the examination of formalities and of absolute grounds for refusal, follow the same procedure as that applied to individual trade marks. 
Na splošno se razvrstitev blaga in storitev ter preizkušanje formalnosti in absolutnih razlogov za zavrnitev opravita v skladu z enakim postopkom, kot se uporablja za individualne blagovne znamke.
For example, examiners will check the list of goods and services or the language requirements in the same way as they do with individual trade marks. 
Tako bodo na primer preizkuševalci seznam blaga in storitev ali jezikovne zahteve preverili na enak način, kot to storijo za individualne znamke.
Similarly, if the EU collective mark falls under one of the grounds for refusal of Article 7 EUTMR, this will also be examined. 
Podobno se preizkusi tudi, ali kolektivna znamka EU spada na področje enega od razlogov za zavrnitev iz člena 7 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Pursuant to the new provision of Article 16 EUTMIR, the regulations submitted by the applicant governing the use of its EU collective mark must cover its use for all the goods and services included in the list of the EU collective mark application. 
V skladu z novo določbo člena 16 izvedbene Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU mora pravilnik o uporabi kolektivne znamke EU, ki ga predloži prijavitelj, zajemati njeno uporabo za blago in storitve s seznama prijave kolektivne blagovne znamke.
For EU collective marks conflicting with PGIs/PDOs, traditional terms for wine or traditional specialities guaranteed, the regulations governing the use of an EU collective mark should accurately reflect any limitation introduced to overcome such conflicts. 
Pri kolektivnih znamkah EU, ki sovpadajo z označbami ZGO/ZOP, tradicionalnimi izrazi za vina ali zajamčenimi tradicionalnimi posebnostmi mora pravilnik o uporabi kolektivne znamke EU natančno navesti vse omejitve, ki se uvedejo za odpravo sovpadanja.
For example, the regulations governing use of the EU collective mark ‘XYZ Designation of Origin' for wines should accurately reflect the fact that they refer to the use of the trade mark for wines complying with the PDO ‘XYZ'. 
Na primer, pravilnik o uporabi kolektivne znamke EU „označba porekla XYZ“ za vina mora natančno navesti, da se nanaša na uporabo blagovne znamke za vina v skladu z ZOP „XYZ“.
Secondly, the examination of an EU collective mark will also consider the exceptions and particularities of this kind of mark. 
Drugič, pri preizkušanju kolektivne znamke EU se bodo upoštevale izjeme in posebnosti tovrstne znamke.
These exceptions and particularities refer both to the formal and substantive provisions. 
Te izjeme in posebnosti se nanašajo na formalne in vsebinske določbe.
As regards formalities, the requirement for regulations governing use of the mark is, for example, a specific characteristic of an EU collective mark. 
V zvezi s formalnostmi je na primer posebna značilnost kolektivne znamke EU zahteva glede pravilnika o uporabi znamke.
(For further details of the examination of formalities of EU collective marks, including the regulations governing use of the mark, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 2, Formalities, paragraph 8.2). 
(Za dodatne podrobnosti o preizkušanju formalnosti kolektivnih znamk EU, vključno s pravilnikom o uporabi znamke, glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 2: Formalnosti, odstavek 8.2.)
The substantive exceptions and particularities that apply to an EU collective mark are described below. 
Vsebinske izjeme in posebnosti, ki se uporabljajo za kolektivne znamke EU, so opisane v nadaljevanju.
2 Ownership 
Lastništvo