natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, the applicant's argument in defence that the opponent had not hitherto invoked or had not hitherto been able to prevent the actual use of the contested mark in the relevant territory cannot succeed (29/03/2011, C96/09 P, Bud, EU:C:2011:189, § 191, 193). 
Zato trditev prijavitelja v zagovoru, da se vložnik ugovora še ni skliceval ali še ni mogel preprečiti dejanske uporabe izpodbijane znamke na zadevnem ozemlju, ne more biti uspešna (29/03/2011, C96/09 P, Bud, EU:C:2011:189, § 191, 193).
Based on the above, the Office will reject the opposition if: 
Urad na podlagi zgornjega zavrne ugovor, če:
the opponent invokes a right but does not include a reference to any specific national law and/or legal provision protecting that right (e.g. the opponent only indicates that the opposition is based on a commercial designation in Germany or that the opposition based on a commercial designation in Germany is protected under DE-TMA); or 
če se vložnik ugovora sklicuje na pravico, vendar ne vključi sklicevanja na katero koli nacionalno pravo in/ali pravno določbo, ki ščiti to pravico (npr. vložnik ugovora navede samo, da ugovor temelji na trgovski označbi v Nemčiji ali da je ugovor, ki temelji na trgovski označbi v Nemčiji, zaščiten na podlagi nemškega zakona o blagovnih znamkah), ali
the opponent provides a reference to the applicable national law and legal provision(s) but the reference is not complete: the legal provision only indicates the conditions governing the acquisition of the right but not the scope of protection of the right (or vice versa) (e.g. the opponent indicates that the opposition is based on a commercial designation in Germany protected under Article 5 DE-TMA, which establishes the conditions for acquisition of the right, but the reference to the conditions governing the scope of protection, Article 15 DE-TMA, is missing); or 
vložnik ugovora predloži sklicevanje na nacionalno pravo in pravno določbo/pravne določbe, ki se uporabljajo, vendar sklicevanje ni popolno: pravna določba navaja samo pogoje, ki urejajo pridobitev pravice, ne pa tudi obsega varstva pravice (ali obratno) (npr. vložnik ugovora navede, da ugovor temelji na trgovski označbi v Nemčiji, zaščiteni na podlagi člena 5 nemškega zakona o blagovnih znamkah, ki določa pogoje za pridobitev pravice, sklicevanje na pogoje, ki urejajo obseg varstva, člen 15 nemškega zakona o blagovnih znamkah, pa manjka), ali
the opponent provides the reference to the relevant legal provision but does not provide the content (text) of the legal provision (e.g. the opponent's submission refers to the DE-TMA but does not include the content of the law); or 
vložnik ugovora predloži sklicevanje na ustrezno pravno določbo, vendar ne predloži vsebine (besedila) pravne določbe (npr. predloženo sklicevanje vložnika ugovora se nanaša na nemški zakon o blagovnih znamkah, vendar ne vključuje vsebine zakona), ali
the opponent provides the content of the legal provision only in the language of the proceedings but not in the original language (e.g. the language of the proceedings is English but the text of the DE-TMA is submitted only in English, not in German); or 
vložnik ugovora predloži vsebino pravne določbe samo v jeziku postopka, vendar ne v jeziku izvirnika (npr. jezik postopka je angleščina, besedilo nemškega zakona o blagovnih znamkah pa se predloži samo v angleščini in ne v nemščini), ali
the opponent does not provide any or sufficient evidence of the acquisition of the right invoked or does not provide arguments as to why it fulfils the conditions governing the scope of protection (e.g. the opponent refers to the relevant legal provisions and provides their content both in the original language and translated into the language of the proceedings, but does not provide any or sufficient evidence of the acquisition of protection or does not state whether it fulfils the conditions of the scope of protection). 
vložnik ugovora ne predloži dokaze, ali ne predloži zadostnih dokazov o pridobitvi pravice, ali ne predloži utemeljitev, zakaj izpolnjuje pogoje, ki urejajo obseg varstva (npr. vložnik ugovora se sklicuje na ustrezne pravne določbe in predloži njihovo vsebino v jeziku izvirnika in prevod v jezik postopka, vendar ne predloži dokazov, ali ne predloži zadostnih dokazov o pridobitvi varstva, ali ne navede, ali izpolnjuje pogoje obsega varstva).
4.2.2 European Union law 
Pravo Evropske unije
The above requirements also apply to European Union law, except that the opponent is not obliged to provide the content (text) of the law invoked. 
Zgornje zahteve se uporabljajo tudi za pravo Evropske unije, pri tem pa vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti vsebine (besedila) prava, na katero se sklicuje.
However, the opponent has to provide particulars proving the fulfilment of the conditions under the relevant provisions of European Union law (paragraph 4.2.1. 
Vendar mora vložnik ugovora predložiti podatke, ki dokazujejo izpolnjevanje pogojev na podlagi ustreznih določb prava Evropske unije (odstavek 4.2.1(b) zgoraj).
The essential function of the protection of a geographical indication is to guarantee to the consumer the geographical origin of the goods and the special qualities connected therewith (29/03/2011, C96/09 P, Bud, EU:C:2011:189, § 147). 
Bistvena funkcija zaščite geografskih označb je zagotavljanje geografskega porekla proizvodov in njihovih značilnosti potrošnikom (29/03/2011, C96/09 P, Bud, EU:C:2011:189, § 147).
A geographical indication identifies a product originating in a particular geographical area, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of that product is essentially attributable to its geographical origin. 
Geografska označba označuje proizvod s poreklom z zadevnega geografskega območja, katerega določeno kakovost, sloves ali drugo značilnost je mogoče pripisati predvsem njegovemu geografskemu poreklu.
EU legislation distinguishes between ‘protected designations of origin' (PDOs), where the quality or characteristics of the product are essentially or exclusively due to a particular geographical environment, and ‘protected geographical indications' (PGIs), where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the product is essentially attributable to its geographical origin, without the stages of production, processing or preparation all necessarily taking place in the same area . 
Zakonodaja EU razlikuje med zaščitenimi označbami porekla (ZOP), pri katerih je mogoče kakovost ali značilnost proizvoda pripisati predvsem ali izključno določenemu geografskemu okolju, in zaščitenimi geografskimi označbami (ZGO), pri katerih je določeno kakovost, sloves ali drugo značilnost proizvoda mogoče pripisati predvsem njegovemu geografskemu poreklu, ne da bi morale faze proizvodnje, predelave ali priprave nujno potekati na istem območju.
In essence, PDOs have a closer link with the geographical area of production. 
Označbe ZOP so v bistvu tesneje povezane z geografskim območjem proizvodnje.
The distinction, however, does not affect their scope of protection, which is the same for PDOs and PGIs. 
Vendar to razlikovanje ne vpliva na njihov obseg varstva, ki je enak za označbe ZOP in ZGO.
For the purposes of this chapter, the term ‘geographical indication' (GI) is used to refer to both PDOs and PGIs in general. 
Za namene tega poglavja se izraz geografska označba uporablja na splošno za označbe ZOP in ZGO.
[3: GIs for spirit drinks and aromatised wine products are protected under EU law as ‘geographical indications', not as PGIs or PDOs.] 
[3: Geografske označbe za žgane pijače in aromatizirane vinske proizvode so na podlagi prava EU zaščitene kot geografske označbe, in ne kot označbe ZGO ali ZOP.]
5.1 Relationship between Article 8(4) and 8(6) EUTMR 
Uredba (EU) 2015/2424 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
Prior to that, GIs could form the basis of an opposition pursuant to Article 8(4) EUTMR as ‘another sign used in the course of trade'. 
Pred tem so bile geografske označbe lahko podlaga za ugovor v skladu s členom 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU kot „[drug znak], ki se uporablja v gospodarskem prometu“.
GIs can no longer form the basis of an opposition under Article 8(4) EUTMR, even though the wording of that provision has not changed. 
Geografske označbe ne morejo več biti podlaga za ugovor v skladu s členom 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, čeprav se besedilo navedene določbe ni spremenilo.
[4: 23 March 2016.] 
[4: 23. marec 2016.]
However, if an opponent files an opposition based on a GI after entry into force of the Amending Regulation, in which it indicates incorrectly Article 8(4) EUTMR as a ground for opposition, the Office will examine the opposition, to the extent that it is clearly based on a GI, as if the ground invoked were Article 8(6) EUTMR. 
Če pa vložnik ugovora ugovor, ki temelji na geografski označbi, vloži po začetku veljavnosti uredbe o spremembi in je v njem kot razlog za ugovor napačno naveden člen 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, bo Urad vseeno preizkusil ugovor, če je očitno, da temelji na geografski označbi, kot če bi se kot razlog uveljavljal člen 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
In such a case, the notice of opposition leaves no doubt as to the opponent's intention to invoke the ground for opposition protecting earlier GIs. 
V takem primeru obvestilo o ugovoru ne dopušča dvoma o namenu vložnika ugovora, da se kot razlog za ugovor sklicuje na zaščito prejšnje geografske označbe.
Article 8(6) EUTMR reads: 
Člen 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se glasi:
Upon opposition by any person authorised under the relevant law to exercise the rights arising from a designation of origin or a geographical indication, the trade mark applied for shall not be registered where and to the extent that, pursuant to the Union legislation or national law providing for the protection of designations of origin or geographical indications: 
Ob ugovoru katere koli osebe, ki je v skladu z zadevnim pravom pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz označbe porekla ali geografske označbe, se blagovna znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, ne registrira, če in kolikor v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalnim pravom o zaščiti označb porekla ali geografskih označb velja naslednje:
(i) an application for a designation of origin or a geographical indication had already been submitted, in accordance with Union legislation or national law, prior to the date of application for registration of the EU trade mark or the date of the priority claimed for the application, subject to its subsequent registration; 
prijava za označbo porekla ali geografsko označbo je že bila vložena v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalnim pravom pred datumom prijave za registracijo blagovne znamke EU ali pred datumom prednostne pravice, zahtevane v zvezi s prijavo, pod pogojem, da je ta pozneje registrirana;
(ii) that designation of origin or geographical indication confers the right to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark. 
ta označba porekla ali geografska označba podeljuje pravico do prepovedi uporabe poznejše blagovne znamke.
The new ground of opposition for GIs specifies this particular type of earlier right, its beneficiary and its date of priority. 
Novi razlog za ugovor za geografske označbe določa to posebno vrsto prejšnje pravice, upravičenca in datum prednostne pravice.
However, apart from those evident specificities, the only substantial difference between Article 8(4) and 8(6) EUTMR is that the latter does not require the opponent to prove use in the course of trade of more than mere local significance. 
Vendar je razen teh očitnih posebnosti edina bistvena razlika med členoma 8(4) in 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, da zadnjenavedeni od vložnika ugovora ne zahteva, da dokaže uporabo v gospodarskem prometu, ki je več kot le lokalnega pomena.
The rest of this chapter addresses the particularities of GIs as a basis for opposition. 
Vrste geografskih označb, zajete v členu 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
5.2.1 GIs protected under EU law 
[5: Nadomešča in razveljavlja Uredbo (ES) št.
[7: Replaced and repealed Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89.] 
aromatizirani vinski proizvodi (v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št.
aromatised wine products (pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 , the ‘Aromatised Wines Regulation'). 
251/2014, v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba o aromatiziranih vinih).
[8: Replaced and repealed Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91.] 
[8: Nadomešča in razveljavlja Uredbo (EGS) št.
The Foodstuffs Regulation protects GIs that existed in Member States and have been applied for to be registered in the EU system of protection (in a simplified registration procedure) within a 6-month period between 24/07/1993 and 23/01/1994 (with similar application periods provided to any new Member State on accession) subject to its registration, and any further GIs applied for and registered pursuant to the EU system of protection thereafter. 
Uredba o živilih ščiti geografske označbe, ki so obstajale v državah članicah in za katere je bila vložena prijava za registracijo v sistemu EU za varstvo (v poenostavljenem postopku registracije) v šestih mesecih med 24. julijem 1993 in 23. januarjem 1994 (s podobnimi roki prijave, ki se vsaki novi državi članici zagotovijo ob pristopu), če se registrirajo, ter vse druge geografske označbe, za katere je vložena prijava in se nato registrirajo v skladu s sistemom EU za varstvo.
The Aromatised Wines Regulation protects GIs that were already protected in a Member State on 27/03/2014 subject to further conditions , and any further GIs applied for and registered pursuant to the EU system of protection thereafter. 
Uredba o aromatiziranih vinih ščiti geografske označbe, ki so že bile zaščitene v državi članici dne 27. marca 2014, pod dodatnimi pogoji, ter vse druge geografske označbe, za katere je vložena prijava in se nato registrirajo v skladu s sistemom EU za varstvo.
GIs protected under the above Regulations are, thus, ‘existing GIs' from Member States that existed before the uniform EU system of protection (subject to further conditions of full EU protection) and ‘new GIs' from Member States that have been applied for and registered under the uniform system of EU protection. 
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi zgornjih uredb, so torej obstoječe geografske označbe iz držav članic, ki so obstajale pred enotnim sistemom EU za varstvo (pod dodatnimi pogoji polne zaščite EU) in nove geografske označbe iz držav članic, za katere je bila vložena prijava in so bile registrirane v skladu z enotnim sistemom EU za varstvo.
Furthermore, GIs originating from third countries are also protected under the above Regulations pursuant to direct applications filed with the Commission (as an alternative to their protection through international agreements, discussed in paragraph 5.2.3 below). 
Tudi geografske označbe iz tretjih držav so zaščitene na podlagi zgornjih uredb v skladu z neposrednimi prijavami, vloženimi pri Komisiji (kot nadomestna možnost za njihovo zaščito na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov, obravnavanih v odstavku 5.2.3 v nadaljevanju).
5.2.1.2 Specifics of substantiation 
Posebnosti utemeljitve
GIs protected under the above Regulations may be a valid basis for an opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR, to the extent that they allow the person authorised under the applicable law to exercise those rights to prevent the use of a subsequent mark. 
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi zgornjih uredb, so lahko veljavna podlaga za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če osebi, ki je v skladu z veljavnim pravom pooblaščena za uveljavljanje teh pravic, omogočajo preprečitev uporabe poznejše znamke.
Their ability to prevent use is governed by the relevant provisions of the Regulations cited above (Articles 13(1), 103(2), 16 and 20(2) of the Foodstuffs, Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations, respectively). 
Njihovo sposobnost preprečevanja uporabe urejajo ustrezne določbe iz zgoraj navedenih uredb (člen 13(1) Uredbe o živilih, člen 103(2) Uredbe o vinih, člen 16 Uredbe o žganih pijačah in člen 20(2) Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih).
In this context, it is important to distinguish the latter provisions preventing use from those that prevent registration of a trade mark, which are not a basis for opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR. 
V okviru tega je pomembno, da se te določbe, ki preprečujejo uporabo, razlikujejo od tistih, ki preprečujejo registracijo blagovne znamke in ki niso podlaga za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
[16: Articles 14(1), 102(1), 23(1) and 19(1) of the Foodstuffs, Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations respectively.] 
[16: Člen 14(1) Uredbe o živilih, člen 102(1) Uredbe o vinih, člen 23(1) Uredbe o žganih pijačah in člen 19(1) Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih.]
In order to substantiate its right, the opponent must provide the Office with the necessary facts and evidence regarding the existence of its right. 
Vložnik ugovora mora za utemeljitev svoje pravice Uradu predložiti potrebna dejstva in dokaze v zvezi z obstojem te pravice.
A mere extract of, or reference to, the relevant online EU databases (DOOR, E-Bacchus or E-Spirit-Drinks) or in the case of spirit drinks, an extract from Annex III to the Spirit Drinks Regulation, is not sufficient, as they do not contain sufficient data to determine all the relevant particulars of the earlier right (e.g. entitlement of the opponent or goods protected by the GI). 
Pri tem niso dovolj le izpiski iz ustreznih spletnih podatkovnih zbirk EU (DOOR, E-Bacchus ali E-Spirit-Drinks) ali sklicevanje nanje ali, v primeru žganih pijač, izpisek iz Priloge III k Uredbi o žganih pijačah, saj ne vsebujejo dovolj podatkov za določitev vseh ustreznih podatkov v zvezi s prejšnjo pravico (npr. upravičenost vložnika ugovora ali blago, zaščiteno z geografsko označbo).
For example, the E-Bacchus and E-Spirit-Drinks extracts/database, or Annex III to the Spirits Drinks Regulation merely indicate the country of origin of the GI, which is not sufficient to prove the opponent's entitlement. 
Izpiski iz podatkovnih zbirk E-Bacchus in E-Spirit-Drinks ali Priloga III k Uredbi o žganih pijačah navajajo samo državo porekla geografske označbe, kar ne zadostuje kot dokaz upravičenosti vložnika ugovora.
Where available, the opponent must provide the Office with copies of the publication and registration of the GI in the Official Journal (or a reference to the relevant online source recognised by the Office, pursuant to Article 7(3) EUTMDR), and, if these documents are not available or lack information about the opponent's entitlement, further documents must be submitted proving entitlement to file the opposition as an authorised person under the relevant law to exercise the rights arising from a GI (Article 46(1)(d) EUTMR and Article 7(2)(e) EUTMDR) (17/10/2013, R 1825/20124, Dresdner Striezel-Glühwein / Dresdner Stollen, § 37). 
Vložnik mora, če so na voljo, Uradu predložiti kopije objave in registracije geografske označbe v uradnem listu (ali sklicevanje na ustrezni spletni vir, ki ga priznava Urad, v skladu s členom 7(3) Delegirane uredbe), če ti dokumenti niso na voljo ali ne zajemajo podatkov o upravičenosti vložnika ugovora, pa je treba predložiti dodatne dokumente, ki dokazujejo upravičenost do vložitve ugovora kot pooblaščena oseba na podlagi zadevnega prava za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz geografske označbe (člen 46(1)(d) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člen 7(2)(e) Delegirane uredbe) (17/10/2013, R 1825/20124, Dresdner Striezel-Glühwein / Dresdner Stollen, § 37).
For example, until such time that the so-called single documents summarising the particulars of the GI are available in EBacchus and E-Spirit-Drinks, opponents seeking to rely on the relevant GIs must provide any means of proof to substantiate their entitlement and other relevant particulars of the GI, including national laws or administrative decisions granting GI protection in force at the time of the automatic extension of EU protection . 
Na primer, dokler v podatkovnih zbirkah EBacchus in E-Spirit-Drinks niso na voljo tako imenovani enotni dokumenti, ki povzemajo podatke o geografskih označbah, morajo vložniki ugovorov, ki se opirajo na zadevne geografske označbe, za utemeljitev svoje upravičenosti predložiti vse dokaze in druge ustrezne podatke o geografski označbi, tudi nacionalne zakone ali upravne odločbe, ki geografski označbi zagotavljajo varstvo in veljajo v času samodejne razširitve varstva EU.
This arises from the findings of the Court in the Budějovický Budvar case (08/09/2009, C478/07, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521, § 95-129). 
To izhaja iz ugotovitev Sodišča v zadevi Budějovický Budvar (08/09/2009, C478/07, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521, § 95-129).
Although the Court has not specifically pronounced upon the exhaustive nature of the Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations, the same principle must apply because they contain substantively similar provisions to the Foodstuffs Regulation and they have the same purpose for the respective products. 
Čeprav se Sodišče ni posebej izreklo v zvezi z izčrpnimi pravili Uredbe o vinih, Uredbe o žganih pijačah in Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih, se mora isto načelo uporabljati tudi za ti dve Uredbi, saj vsebujeta določbe, ki so vsebinsko podobne določbam Uredbe o živilih in imajo v zvezi z zadevnimi proizvodi enak namen.
[18: For additional information, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 10, Trade Marks in Conflict with Designations of Origin and Geographical Indications (Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR).] 
[18: Dodatne informacije so na voljo v Smernicah, del B: Preizkušanje, oddelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavje 10: Blagovne znamke, ki sovpadajo z označbami porekla in geografskimi označbami (člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).]
5.2.2 GIs protected under the laws of Member States 
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi prava držav članic
GIs protected under the laws of Member States may be a basis for opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR only to the extent that no uniform EU protection is in place for the given category of goods. 
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi prava držav članic, so lahko podlaga za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU samo, če za zadevno kategorijo blaga ni enotnega sistema EU za varstvo.
For the reasons set out above, in the areas of foodstuffs, wines, spirit drinks and aromatised wine products, protection at EU level is exhaustive in nature, which means that opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR cannot be based on national rights in these areas. 
Varstvo na področju živil, vin, žganih pijač in aromatiziranih vinskih proizvodov na ravni EU iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov vsebuje izčrpna pravila, kar pomeni, da na teh področjih ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne more temeljiti na nacionalnih pravicah.
This is because the EU system of protection comprising the above Regulations overrides and replaces national protection of GIs for foodstuffs, wines, spirit drinks and aromatised wine products. 
To pa zato, ker sistem EU za varstvo, ki vključuje zgoraj Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, razveljavlja in nadomešča nacionalno varstvo geografskih označb za živila, vina, žgane pijače in aromatizirane vinske proizvode.