natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the dictionary, ice is the singular of ices and means inter alia ‘(an) ice cream' or ‘water ice' (Oxford Dictionaries online edition). 
Po slovarju je angleška beseda ice (led) edninska oblika besede ices in med drugim pomeni „ice cream“ (sladoled) ali „water ice“ (vodni led) (spletna izdaja slovarjev Oxford Dictionaries).
If the comparison of ices and ice in Class 30 were made on the basis of the definition from the dictionary alone, it would lead to the erroneous conclusion that ice is identical to ices. 
Če bi besedi ices in ice iz razreda 30 primerjali samo na podlagi slovarske opredelitve, bi to privedlo do napačne ugotovitve, da je ice enako ices.
However, since both ices and ice are mentioned in the list of goods in Class 30, ices are to be understood as ‘edible ices', whereas ice is to be understood as ‘cooling ice'. 
Ker pa sta obe besedi, ices in ice, navedeni v seznamu blaga iz razreda 30, je treba ices razumeti „kot sladoled“, ice pa je treba razumeti „kot led“.
Although they coincide in the composition to the extent that both consist (partly) of frozen water, their commercial nature is different: while one is a foodstuff, the other is an auxiliary good for preserving and/or cooling foodstuffs. 
Čeprav se ujemata v sestavi, saj oba (delno) sestavlja zmrznjena voda, je njuna poslovna narava različna: eden je živilo, drugi pa je drugi pomožno blago za podaljšanje trajnosti in/ali hlajenje živil.
This shows that the Nice Classification, in conjunction with the commercial perspective, prevails over the dictionary definition. 
To kaže, da Nicejska klasifikacija v povezavi s poslovnim vidikom prevlada nad slovarsko opredelitvijo.
Once the relevant factors have been identified, the examiner must determine the relation between and the weight attributed to the relevant factors (see paragraph 3.3 below). 
Preizkuševalec mora po opredelitvi upoštevnih dejavnikov določiti povezavo med njimi in njihovo težo, ki se jim pripisuje (glej odstavek 3.3 v nadaljevanju).
3.2 The specific similarity factors 
Posebni dejavniki podobnosti
The following paragraphs define and illustrate the various factors for similarity of goods and services. 
V naslednjih odstavkih so opredeljeni in ponazorjeni različni dejavniki podobnosti blaga in storitev.
3.2.1 Nature 
Narava
The nature of a product/service can be defined as the essential qualities or characteristics by which this product/service is recognised. 
Naravo proizvoda ali storitve je mogoče opredeliti kot bistvene lastnosti ali značilnosti, po katerih je ta proizvod ali storitev mogoče prepoznati.
Nature often corresponds to the particular type or sort of product/service or the specific category to which this product/service belongs and which is usually used to define it. 
Narava pogosto ustreza določenemu tipu ali vrsti proizvoda ali storitve ali posebni kategoriji, v katero ta proizvod ali storitev spada in ki se običajno uporablja za njegovo ali njeno opredelitev.
In other words, it is the answer to the question ‘What is it?' 
Z drugimi besedami, to je odgovor na vprašanje: „Kaj je to?
Car is a vehicle; 
Avtomobil je vozilo.
Body lotion is a cosmetic product. 
Losjon za telo je kozmetično sredstvo.
3.2.1.1 Indicative value of class headings and categories 
Okvirna vrednost naslovov razredov in kategorij
The fact that goods/services to be compared fall under the same general indication of a class heading or broad category does not automatically mean that they are of the same nature. 
Dejstvo, da blago ali storitve, ki se primerjajo, spadajo pod isto splošno označbo naslova razreda ali v širšo kategorijo, ne pomeni samodejno, da so enake narave.
An example of such a broad category is foodstuffs for human consumption. 
Primer takšne širše kategorije so živila za človeško prehrano.
Fresh fruit (Class 31) on the one hand and coffee, flour, and bread (Class 30) on the other hand are of a different nature despite being foodstuffs. 
Sveže sadje (razred 31) na eni strani ter kava, moka in kruh (razred 30) na drugi imajo različno naravo, kljub temu da so živila.
This slight connection, namely all being foodstuffs, does not preclude that their nature is different. 
Ta šibka povezava, saj vse navedeno spada pod živila, ne izključuje možnosti, da je njihova narava različna.
The fact that goods/services to be compared fall under a sufficiently narrow general indication of a class heading favours an identical or similar nature. 
Dejstvo, da blago ali storitve, ki se primerjajo, spadajo pod dovolj ozko splošno označbo naslova razreda, daje prednost enaki ali podobni naravi.
Condensed milk and cheese (both in Class 29) share the same nature because they belong to the same product category, namely milk products, which are a subcategory of foodstuffs (4/11/2003, T85/02, Castillo, EU:T:2003:288, § 33). 
Kondenzirano mleko in sir (oba iz razreda 29) imata enako naravo, saj spadata v isto družino izdelkov, in sicer med mlečne izdelke, ki so podkategorija živil (4/11/2003, T85/02, Castillo, EU:T:2003:288, § 33).
3.2.1.2 Features of the goods defining their nature 
Lastnosti blaga, ki opredeljujejo njegovo naravo
A variety of features of the goods in question may be useful for defining their nature. 
Za opredelitev narave zadevnega blaga je mogoče uporabiti njegove različne lastnosti.
These include the following: 
Te so med drugim:
Composition: for example, ingredients, materials of which the goods are made. 
Sestava: na primer sestavine in materiali, iz katerih je narejeno blago.
Yoghurt (Class 29) is a milk product (the nature of yoghurt may be defined by its basic ingredient). 
Jogurt (razred 29) je mlečni izdelek (naravo jogurta je mogoče opredeliti z njegovo osnovno sestavino).
Composition may be the most relevant criterion for defining nature. 
Sestava je morda najustreznejše merilo za opredelitev narave.
However, an identical or similar composition of the goods is not per se an indicator of the same nature. 
Vendar enaka ali podobna sestava blaga sama po sebi ne kaže enake narave.
A chair (Class 20) and a doll (Class 28) can both be made of plastic, but they are not of the same nature since one is a piece of furniture and the other is a toy. 
Stol (razred 20) in punčka (igrača) (razred 28) sta lahko oba narejena iz plastike, vendar nista enake narave, saj je prvi proizvod kos pohištva, drugi pa igrača.
They belong to different categories. 
Zato spadata v različni kategoriji.
Functioning principle: for example, mechanical functioning, with or without engine/motor; optical, electrical, biological, or chemical functioning. 
Načelo delovanja: na primer mehansko delovanje, z motorjem ali brez njega; optično, električno, biološko ali kemično delovanje.
Telescope (Class 9) is an optical device (the nature of a telescope may be defined by its functioning principle, which is optical). 
Teleskop (razred 9) je optična naprava (naravo teleskopa je mogoče opredeliti z njegovim načelom delovanja, ki je optično).
Although the functioning principle may help to define the nature of some goods, it is not always conclusive. 
Čeprav si je mogoče z načelom delovanja pomagati pri opredelitvi narave nekaterega blaga, pa to načelo ni vedno odločilno.
There are cases where goods, in particular technology-related ones, with the same functioning principle are of a different nature. 
Obstajajo primeri, v katerih ima blago, zlasti s področja tehnologije, enako načelo delovanja in drugačno naravo.
A blender and an electric toothbrush have the same functioning principle of rotation, but they are not of the same nature. 
Mešalnik in električna zobna ščetka imata enako načelo delovanja, tj. vrtenje, vendar nimata enake narave.
In contrast, there are goods with different functioning principles but the same nature. 
Nasprotno pa obstaja blago z različnimi načeli delovanja, vendar enako naravo.
The functioning principle of washing machines using washing powder is chemical, which is not the same as the functioning principle of washing machines using magnetic waves. 
Načelo delovanja pralnih strojev, ki uporabljajo pralni prašek, je kemično in ni enako načelu delovanja pralnih strojev, ki uporabljajo magnetne valove.
However, these goods are of the same nature as they are both washing machines. 
Vendar sta ta proizvoda enake narave, saj sta oba pralna stroja.
Physical condition: for example, liquid/solid, hard/soft, flexible/rigid. 
Fizikalno stanje: na primer tekoče/trdno, trdo/mehko, prožno/togo.
The physical condition is another feature of the goods that may be used to define nature but, like the functioning principle, it is not conclusive. 
Fizikalno stanje je še ena od lastnosti blaga, ki jo je mogoče uporabiti za opredelitev narave, vendar tako kot načelo delovanja tudi to ni odločilno.
All drinks are liquid. 
Vse pijače so tekoče.
Their nature is different from the nature of solid foodstuffs. 
Njihova narava je drugačna od narave živil v trdem stanju.
However, when comparing two different drinks, their physical condition should not be conclusive: milk (Class 29) is not of the same nature as an alcoholic beverage (Class 33). 
Vendar pri primerjavi dveh pijač ne sme biti odločilno njuno fizikalno stanje: mleko (razred 29) ni enake narave kot alkoholna pijača (razred 33).
Yoghurt is marketed both in solid and liquid form. 
Jogurt se trži v trdni in tekoči obliki.
However, the nature of this good is not defined by its physical condition, but - as mentioned above - by its basic ingredient (milk). 
Vendar narava tega izdelka ni opredeljena z njegovim fizikalnim stanjem, temveč - kot je navedeno zgoraj - z njegovo osnovno sestavino (mleko).
In both cases, the nature of a solid yogurt and of a liquid yogurt is the same (a milk product). 
V obeh primerih je narava trdnega jogurta in tekočega jogurta enaka (mlečni izdelek).
3.2.1.3 Nature of services 
Narava storitev
When defining the nature of services, the composition of features, functioning principle and physical condition cannot be used since services are intangible. 
Pri opredelitvi narave storitev ni mogoče uporabiti skupka lastnosti, načela delovanja in fizikalnega stanja, ker so storitve neopredmetene.
The nature of services can be defined, in particular, by the kind of activity provided to third parties. 
Naravo storitev je mogoče opredeliti zlasti z vrsto dejavnosti, ki se zagotavlja tretjim osebam.
In most cases, it is the category under which the service falls that defines its nature. 
V večini primerov naravo storitev določa kategorija, v katero spadajo.
Taxi services (Class 39) have the same nature as bus services (Class 39) as they are both transport services. 
Taksi storitve (razred 39) imajo enako naravo kot storitve avtobusnega prevoza (razred 39), saj gre v obeh primerih za prevozne storitve.
3.2.1.4 Nature of goods versus nature of services 
Narava blaga v primerjavi z naravo storitev
By their nature, goods are generally dissimilar to services. 
Blago se od storitev običajno razlikuje po svoji naravi.
This is because goods are articles of trade, wares or merchandise. 
To pa zato, ker blago vključuje trgovsko blago, proizvode ali prodajne izdelke.
Their sale usually entails the transfer in title of something physical. 
Njegova prodaja običajno vključuje prenos lastninske pravice na nekem predmetu.
Services, however, consist of the provision of intangible activities. 
Storitve pa pomenijo zagotavljanje neopredmetenih dejavnosti.
3.2.2 Intended purpose 
Predvideni namen
‘Purpose' is generally defined as ‘the reason for which something is done or made, or for which it exists' (Oxford Dictionaries online edition). 
„Namen“ je običajno opredeljen kot razlog, zaradi katerega se nekaj dela ali ustvarja ali zaradi katerega nekaj obstaja (spletna izdaja slovarjev Oxford Dictionaries).
As a Canon factor, purpose means the intended use of the goods or services and not any other possible use. 
Namen kot dejavnik iz sodbe v zadevi Canon pomeni predvideno uporabo blaga ali storitev in ne drugo možno uporabo.
A plastic bag can be used as protection against the rain. 
Plastično vrečko je mogoče uporabiti kot zaščito pred dežjem.
However, its intended purpose is to carry items. 
Njen predvideni namen pa je prenašanje predmetov.
The purpose is defined by the function of the goods/services. 
Namen je opredeljen s funkcijo blaga ali storitev.
In other words, it answers the questions: What need do these goods/services satisfy? 
Z drugimi besedami, daje odgovor na vprašanji: Kaj morajo to blago ali storitve zadovoljiti?
What problem do they solve? 
Katero težavo rešujejo?
It is sometimes difficult to determine the proper level of abstraction in order to determine the purpose. 
Včasih je težko določiti ustrezno raven abstraktnosti za opredelitev namena.
As in the case of defining the nature, the purpose must be defined in a sufficiently narrow way. 
Tako kot naravo je treba tudi namen določiti dovolj ozko.
In the case of vinegar, the intended purpose should not be defined as ‘human consumption', which is the general purpose that all foodstuffs share, but as ‘everyday seasoning'. 
Pri kisu se predvideni namen ne sme opredeliti kot „prehrana ljudi“, kar je skupni splošni namen vseh živil, temveč kot „vsakdanja začimba“.
The method of use determines the way in which the goods/services are used to achieve their purpose. 
Način uporabe določa, kako se blago ali storitve uporabljajo za dosego svojega namena.
The question to be asked is: How are these goods/services used? 
Postaviti je treba naslednje vprašanje: Kako se blago ali storitve uporabljajo?
Method of use often follows directly from the nature and/or intended purpose of the goods/services and therefore has little or no significance of its own in the similarity analysis. 
Način uporabe pogosto izhaja neposredno iz narave in/ali predvidenega namena blaga ali storitev in je zato sam po sebi pri analizi podobnosti malo pomemben oziroma sploh ni pomemben.
The method of use of newspapers and books is the same in the sense that they are both read. 
Način uporabe časopisov in knjig je enak v smislu, da se oboje bere.
However, similarity can already be concluded from the facts that they are both printed matter (same nature) and that they both serve to entertain or to inform (same purpose). 
Vendar je o podobnosti mogoče sklepati že iz dejstev, da gre v obeh primerih za tiskovino (enaka narava) in da se oboje uporablja za zabavo ali obveščanje (enak namen).
Notwithstanding the explanation above, the method of use may be important, independent of nature and purpose, where it characterises the goods. 
Ne glede na zgoraj navedeno razlago pa je lahko način uporabe pomemben neodvisno od narave in namena, če označuje blago.
Pharmaceutical preparations for treating skin diseases in Class 5 can take the form of creams. 
Farmacevtski pripravki za zdravljenje kožnih bolezni iz razreda 5 so lahko v obliki krem.
They have the same method of use as cosmetic creams in Class 3. 
Imajo enak način uporabe kot kozmetične kreme iz razreda 3.
However, even where the method of use characterises the goods under comparison and where it is identical for both goods, this fact alone will not be sufficient to establish similarity. 
Vendar če je način uporabe značilen za blago, ki se primerja, in če je enak za obe vrsti blaga, to samo po sebi ne bo zadostovalo za ugotovitev podobnosti.
Chewing gum (Class 30) and chewing tobacco (Class 34) have an identical method of use. 
Žvečilni gumi (razred 30) in tobak za žvečenje (razred 34) imata enak način uporabe.
However, this fact alone does not make them similar. 
Vendar si le zaradi tega še nista podobna.
3.2.4 Complementarity 
Dopolnjevanje
Goods (or services) are complementary if there is a close connection between them, in the sense that one is indispensable (essential) or important (significant) for the use of the other in such a way that consumers may think that responsibility for the production of those goods or provision of those services lies with the same undertaking (11/05/2011, T74/10, Flaco, EU:T:2011:207, § 40; 21/11/2012, T558/11, Artis, EU:T:2012:615, § 25; 04/02/2013, T504/11, Dignitude, EU:T:2013:57, § 44). 
Proizvodi (ali storitve) se med seboj dopolnjujejo, če med njimi obstaja tesna povezava v tem smislu, da je eden neobhodno potreben (nujen) ali pomemben (ključen) za uporabo drugega, tako da lahko potrošniki sklepajo, da oba proizvoda izdeluje oziroma obe storitvi opravlja isto podjetje (11/05/2011, T74/10, Flaco, EU:T:2011:207, § 40; 21/11/2012, T558/11, Artis, EU:T:2012:615, § 25; 04/02/2013, T504/11, Dignitude, EU:T:2013:57, § 44).
The complementary relation between the goods/services can be, for example, functional. 
Dopolnjevalni odnos med proizvodi ali storitvami je lahko na primer funkcionalen.
Internet site hosting services in Class 42 cannot exist without computer programming services in Class 42. 
Gostovanje spletnih strani na internetu iz razreda 42 ne more obstajati brez računalniškega programiranja iz razreda 42.
There is a functional complementarity between those services, which, by their nature, belong to the field of information technology. 
Med tema storitvama, ki po svoji naravi spadata na področje informacijske tehnologije, obstaja funkcionalen dopolnjevalni odnos.
Moreover, these services are aimed at the same public and use the same distribution channels. 
Poleg tega sta storitvi namenjeni isti javnosti in uporabljata iste distribucijske poti.
They are therefore similar (29/09/2011, T150/10, Loopia, EU:T:2011:552, § 36, 43). 
Zato sta si podobni (29/09/2011, T150/10, Loopia, EU:T:2011:552, § 36, 43).
By definition, goods intended for different publics cannot be complementary (22/06/2011, T76/09, Farma Mundi Farmaceuticos Mundi, EU:T:2011:298, § 30; 12/07/2012, T361/11, Dolphin, EU:T:2012:377, § 48). 
Blago, namenjeno različnima javnostma, po definiciji ne more biti dopolnjevalno (22/06/2011, T76/09, Farma Mundi Farmaceuticos Mundi, EU:T:2011:298, § 30; 12/07/2012, T361/11, Dolphin, EU:T:2012:377, § 48).
See also paragraph 3.3.1 below. 
Glej tudi odstavek 3.3.1 v nadaljevanju.
Textile products in Class 24 (aimed at the public at large) and treatment services relating to textile products in Class 40 (aimed at professionals) cannot be complementary (16/05/2013, T80/11, Ridge Wood, EU:T:2013:251, § 28-32). 
Tekstilni izdelki iz razreda 24 (namenjeni širši javnosti) in storitve obdelave tekstilnih izdelkov iz razreda 40 (namenjene strokovnjakom) ne morejo biti dopolnjevalni (16/05/2013, T80/11, Ridge Wood, EU:T:2013:251, § 28-32).
These goods and services are not similar. 
Ti proizvodi in storitve niso podobni.
Complementarity is not usually conclusive on its own for finding similarity between goods and/or services. 
Dopolnjevanje samo po sebi običajno ni odločilno za ugotovitev podobnosti med proizvodi in/ali storitvami.
Even where a degree of complementarity exists, goods and/or services may be dissimilar. 
Tudi če obstaja določena stopnja dopolnjevanja, si proizvodi in/ali storitve morda niso podobni.
There is a degree of complementarity between wine (Class 33) and wineglasses (Class 21) insofar as wineglasses are intended to be used for drinking wine. 
Med vinom (razred 33) in kozarci za vino (razred 21) je neka stopnja dopolnjevanja, saj so kozarci za vino namenjeni pitju vina.
However, that complementarity is not sufficiently pronounced to conclude that these goods are similar. 
Vendar to dopolnjevanje ni dovolj izrazito za ugotovitev, da je to blago podobno.
Furthermore, these goods are not of the same nature or usual origin nor do they usually share distribution channels (12/06/2007, T105/05, Waterford Stellenbosch, EU:T:2007:170, § 34; confirmed 07/05/2009, C398/07 P, Waterford Stellenbosch, EU:C:2009:288, § 45). 
Poleg tega to blago ni enake narave ali običajnega izvora, poleg tega običajno nima enakih distribucijskih poti (12/06/2007, T105/05, Waterford Stellenbosch, EU:T:2007:170, § 34; potrjena 07/05/2009, C398/07 P, Waterford Stellenbosch, EU:C:2009:288, § 45).
However, when complementarity between goods/services has been found in combination with other factors, such as ‘usual origin' and/or ‘distribution channel', similarity may be found. 
Če pa je bilo dopolnjevanje med proizvodi ali storitvami ugotovljeno v kombinaciji z drugimi dejavniki, kot so „običajni izvor“ in/ali „distribucijska pot“, je podobnost mogoče ugotoviti.
Skis (Class 28) and ski boots (Class 25) are complementary because the use of one is indispensable for the use of the other. 
Smuči (razred 28) in smučarski čevlji (razred 25) se dopolnjujejo, ker je uporaba enih nepogrešljiva za uporabo drugih.
The relevant public may think that the production of these goods lies with the same undertaking. 
Upoštevna javnost bi lahko mislila, da ta dva proizvoda proizvaja isto podjetje.
In addition, they share the same public and distribution channels. 
Poleg tega si delita isto javnost in distribucijske poti.
These goods are consequently considered similar. 
Ta proizvoda se zato štejeta za podobna.
Teaching materials in Classes 9 and 16 (such as printed matter, pre-recorded data carriers and audio/video cassettes) are essential and thus complementary to educational courses in Class 41. 
Material za učenje ali poučevanje iz razredov 9 in 16 (kot so tiskovine, vnaprej posneti podatkovni nosilci in avdiokasete ali videokasete) je nujen za izobraževalne tečaje iz razreda 41 in jih zato dopolnjuje.
Generally the materials are issued by the same undertaking, and share the same public and distribution channels. 
Običajno ga izdaja isto podjetje ter si deli isto javnost in distribucijske poti.
These goods are similar to the services in question (23/10/2002, T388/00, ELS, EU:T:2002:260). 
To blago je podobno zadevnim storitvam (23/10/2002, T388/00, ELS, EU:T:2002:260).
Services of an architect (designing of buildings) (Class 42) are indispensable for building construction (Class 37). 
Arhitekturne storitve (načrtovanje stavb) (razred 42) so nepogrešljive za stavbeništvo (razred 37).
These services are often offered together through the same distribution channels, by the same providers and to the same public. 
Te storitve se pogosto ponujajo skupaj, in sicer jih ponujajo isti izvajalci po istih distribucijskih poteh isti javnosti.
Consequently, these services are complementary and similar (09/04/2014, T144/12, Comsa / COMSA S.A., EU:T:2014:197, § 65-67). 
Zato se te storitve dopolnjujejo in so podobne (09/04/2014, T144/12, Comsa / COMSA S.A., EU:T:2014:197, § 65-67).
3.2.4.1 Use in combination: not complementary 
Uporaba v kombinaciji: nedopolnjevalno
Complementarity has to be clearly distinguished from use in combination where goods/services are merely used together, whether by choice or convenience (e.g. bread and butter). 
Dopolnjevanje je treba jasno razlikovati od uporabe v kombinaciji, ko se blago ali storitve le uporabljajo skupaj, po izbiri ali zaradi priročnosti (npr. kruh in maslo).
This means that they are not essential for each other (16/12/2013, R 634/20134, ST LAB (fig.) / ST et al., § 20). 
To pomeni, da drug za drugega niso nujni (16/12/2013, R 634/20134, ST LAB (fig.) / ST et al., § 20).
In such cases similarity can only be found on the basis of other factors, not on complementarity. 
V takšnih primerih je mogoče podobnost ugotoviti samo na podlagi drugih dejavnikov, ne na podlagi dopolnjevanja.
Even if the functioning of transmission belts in Class 12 can be measured with the help of a device for motor-vehicle testing in Class 9, this does not mean that the goods are complementary. 
Čeprav se lahko delovanje pogonskih jermenov iz razreda 12 meri z napravo za preizkušanje avtomobilskih vozil iz razreda 9, to ne pomeni, da se zadevno blago dopolnjuje.
It can be convenient in certain cases to measure the performance of one or the other parameter but simple convenience is not sufficient to conclude that one product is indispensable for the other (03/10/2013, R 1011/20124, SUN (fig.) / SUN (fig.) et al., § 39). 
V nekaterih primerih je lahko priročno, da se meri učinkovitost enega ali drugega parametra, vendar le priročnost ne zadostuje za ugotovitev, da je en proizvod nepogrešljiv za drugega (03/10/2013, R 1011/20124, SUN (fig.) / SUN (fig.) et al., § 39).