natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 5(1)(b) of the Directive cannot be interpreted as meaning that where: a trade mark has a particularly distinctive character, either per se or because of the reputation it enjoys with the public, and a third party, without the consent of the proprietor of the mark, uses, in the course of trade in goods or services that are identical with, or similar to, those for which the trade mark is registered, a sign that so closely corresponds to the mark as to give the possibility of its being associated with that mark, the exclusive right enjoyed by the proprietor entitles him to prevent the use of the sign by that third party if the distinctive character of the mark is such that the possibility of such association giving rise to confusion cannot be ruled out (emphasis added) (para. 42). 
Člena 5(1)(b) direktive ni mogoče razlagati, kot da: ima blagovna znamka poseben razlikovalni učinek, bodisi sama po sebi bodisi zaradi ugleda v javnosti, in kadar tretja oseba brez soglasja imetnika blagovne znamke v gospodarskem prometu z blagom ali storitvami, ki so enaki ali podobni tistim, za katere je bila blagovna znamka registrirana, uporablja znak, ki je tako podoben blagovni znamki, da bi ga bilo mogoče povezati z navedeno blagovno znamko, imetniku njegova izključna pravica omogoča, da prepreči uporabo tega znaka tretji osebi, če je razlikovalni učinek blagovne znamke takšen, da ni mogoče izključiti možnosti takšnega povezovanja, ki povzroča zmedo (dodan poudarek) (točka 42).
Where the goods or services are identical there may be a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public where the contested sign is composed by juxtaposing the company name of another party and a registered mark that has normal distinctiveness and which, without alone determining the overall impression conveyed by the composite sign, still has an independent distinctive role therein (para. 37). 
V javnosti lahko obstaja verjetnost zmede v primeru enakega blaga ali storitev, ko je izpodbijani znak sestavljen iz dveh elementov, postavljenih drug ob drugem, na eni strani oznake družbe tretje osebe in na drugi strani registrirane blagovne znamke z normalno razlikovalno močjo, in kadar ta, ne da bi sama ustvarjala celotni vtis sestavljenega znaka, v tem znaku ohrani avtonomni razlikovalni položaj (točka 37).
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part C, Opposition Page 2 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del C, Ugovor stran 12
DOUBLE IDENTITY AND 
DVOJNA ENAKOST
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION 
IN VERJETNOST ZMEDE
COMPARISON OF 
PRIMERJAVA
GOODS AND SERVICES 
BLAGA IN STORITEV
1.1 Relevance 5 
1.1 Ustreznost 6
1.2 Nice Classification: a starting point 6 
1.2 Nicejska klasifikacija: izhodiščna točka 7
1.2.1 Its nature as a classification tool 6 
1.2.1 Njena narava kot orodje za razvrščanje 7
1.2.2 Its structure and methodology 6 
1.2.2 Njena struktura in metodologija 7
1.2.3 Conclusions to be drawn from the structure of the Nice Classification 7 
1.2.3 Končne ugotovitve glede strukture Nicejske klasifikacije 8
1.2.4 Changes in the classification of goods/services 7 
1.2.4 Spremembe v razvrstitvi blaga ali storitev 8
1.3 The Similarity Tool (EUIPN) for the comparison of goods/services 8 
1.3 Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti (EUIPN) za primerjavo blaga ali storitev 9
1.4 Definition of goods and services (terminology) 8 
1.4 Opredelitev blaga in storitev (terminologija) 9
1.4.1 Goods 8 
1.4.1 Blago 9
1.4.2 Services 9 
1.4.2 Storitve 10
1.5 Determining the goods/services 10 
1.5 Določitev blaga ali storitev 11
1.5.1 The correct wording 10 
1.5.1 Ustrezno besedilo 11
1.5.2 The relevant scope 11 
1.5.2 Zadevni obseg 12
1.5.3 The meaning of goods/services 13 
1.5.3 Pomen blaga ali storitev 14
1.6 Objective approach 14 
1.6 Nepristranski pristop 15
1.7 Statement of reasons 15 
1.7 Obrazložitev 15
2 Identity 15 
2 Enakost 16
2.1 General principles 15 
2.1 Splošna načela 16
2.2 Identical terms or synonyms 15 
2.2 Enaki izrazi ali sinonimi 16
2.3 Terms included in the general indication or broad category 16 
2.3 Izrazi, vključeni v splošno označbo ali široko kategorijo 17
2.4 Overlap 18 
2.4 Prekrivanje 19
2.5 Practice on the use of general indications of the class headings 19 
2.5 Praksa na področju uporabe splošnih označb naslovov razredov 20
3 Similarity of Goods and Services 21 
3 Podobnost blaga in storitev 22
3.1 General principles 21 
3.1 Splošna načela 22
3.1.1 Similarity factors 21 
3.1.1 Dejavniki podobnosti 22
3.1.2 Defining relevant factors 22 
3.1.2 Opredelitev upoštevnih dejavnikov 23
3.2 The specific similarity factors 23 
3.2 Posebni dejavniki podobnosti 23
3.2.1 Nature 23 
3.2.1 Narava 24
3.2.2 Intended purpose 25 
3.2.2 Predvideni namen 26
3.2.4 Complementarity 26 
3.2.4 Dopolnjevanje 27
3.2.5 In competition 29 
3.2.5 Medsebojna konkurenčnost 30
3.2.6 Distribution channel 30 
3.2.6 Distribucijska pot 30
3.2.7 Relevant public 31 
3.2.7 Upoštevna javnost 31
3.2.8 Usual origin (producer/provider) 32 
3.2.8 Običajni izvor (proizvajalec/izvajalec) 32
3.3 Relation between different factors 34 
3.3 Povezava med različnimi dejavniki 34
3.3.1 Interrelation of factors 34 
3.3.1 Medsebojna povezanost dejavnikov 34
3.3.2 Importance of each factor 35 
3.3.2 Pomen posameznih dejavnikov 35
3.3.3 Different types of comparisons: goods versus goods, services versus services and goods versus services 36 
3.3.3 Različne vrste primerjav: blago z blagom, storitve s storitvami in blago s storitvami 36
3.3.4 Degree of similarity 36 
3.3.4 Stopnja podobnosti 36
Annex I 38 
Priloga I 38
1 Parts, Components and Fittings 38 
1 Sestavni deli, komponente in spojni elementi 38
2 Raw Materials and Semi-Processed Goods 38 
2 Surovine in polizdelki 38
3 Accessories 39 
3 Dodatki 39
4 Installation, Maintenance and Repair Services 40 
4 Montaža, vzdrževanje in popravila 40
5 Advisory Services 40 
5 Svetovalne storitve 40
6 Rental and Leasing 41 
6 Najem in zakup 41
6.1 Rental/leasing versus related services 42 
6.1 Najem/zakup v primerjavi s povezanimi storitvami 42
6.2 Rental/leasing versus goods 42 
6.2 Najem/zakup v primerjavi z blagom 42
Annex II 43 
Priloga II 43
1 Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetics 43 
1 Kemikalije, farmacevtski proizvodi in kozmetični izdelki 43
1.1 Chemicals (Class 1) versus chemical products (Classes 3 and 5) 43 
1.1 Kemikalije (razred 1) v primerjavi s kemičnimi proizvodi (razreda 3 in 5) 43
1.2 Pharmaceuticals versus pharmaceuticals 43 
1.2 Farmacevtski proizvodi v primerjavi z drugimi farmacevtskimi proizvodi 43
1.3 Pharmaceuticals versus dietetic substances adapted for medical use 45 
1.3 Farmacevtski proizvodi v primerjavi z dietetičnimi snovmi za medicinsko uporabo 44
1.4 Pharmaceuticals versus cosmetics 45 
1.4 Farmacevtski proizvodi v primerjavi s kozmetičnimi izdelki 45
1.5 Pharmaceuticals versus services 45 
1.5 Farmacevtski proizvodi v primerjavi s storitvami 45
2 Automobile Industry 45 
2 Avtomobilska industrija 45
3 Electric Apparatus/Instruments 46 
3 Električne naprave/instrumenti 46
4 Fashion and Textile Industries 46 
4 Modna in tekstilna industrija 46
4.1 Raw or semi-processed materials versus finished goods 46 
4.1 Surovine ali polpredelano blago v primerjavi s končnim blagom 46
4.2 Textile goods (Class 24) versus clothing (Class 25) 47 
4.2 Tekstilni izdelki (razred 24) v primerjavi z oblačili (razred 25) 47
4.3 Clothing, footwear and headgear (Class 25) 47 
4.3 Oblačila, obutev in pokrivala (razred 25) 47
4.4 Fashion accessories 48 
4.4 Modni dodatki 47
4.5 Sports clothing, footwear and headgear (Class 25) versus sporting and gymnastic articles (Class 28) 49 
4.5 Športna oblačila, obutev in pokrivala (razred 25) v primerjavi z gimnastičnimi in športnimi potrebščinami (razred 28) 48
4.6 Fashion design (Class 42) and tailoring services (Class 40) versus clothing (Class 25) 49 
4.6 Modno oblikovanje oblačil (razred 42) in izdelava oblačil po meri (razred 40) v primerjavi z oblačili (razred 25) 49
5 Food, Beverages and Restaurant Services 49 
5 Hrana, pijača in storitve restavracij 49
5.1 Ingredients of prepared food 49 
5.1 Sestavine pripravljene hrane 49
5.2 Main ingredient 49 
5.2 Glavna sestavina 49
5.3 Non-alcoholic beverages (Class 32) versus alcoholic beverages (except beers) (Class 33) 50 
5.3 Brezalkoholne pijače (razred 32) v primerjavi z alkoholnimi pijačami (razen piva) (razred 33) 50
5.4 Beers (Class 32), alcoholic beverages (except beers) (Class 33) 50 
5.4 Pivo (razred 32) v primerjavi z alkoholnimi pijačami (razen piva) (razred 33) 50
5.5 Provision of food and drinks versus food and drinks 50 
5.5 Nudenje hrane in pijače v primerjavi s hrano in pijačo 50
6 Services to Support Other Businesses 51 
6 Storitve za zagotavljanje podpore drugim podjetjem 51
7 Retail Services 54 
7 Storitve prodaje na drobno 53
7.1 Retail services versus any product 54 
7.1 Storitve prodaje na drobno v primerjavi s katerim koli proizvodom 54
7.2 Retail services of specific goods versus same specific goods: similar to a low degree 55 
7.2 Storitve prodaje specifičnega blaga na drobno v primerjavi z istim posameznim blagom: nizka stopnja podobnosti 54
7.3 Retail services of specific goods versus different or similar specific goods: dissimilar 55 
7.3 Storitve prodaje posameznega blaga na drobno v primerjavi z različnim ali podobnim posameznim blagom: različnost 55
7.4 Retail services versus retail services or retail services of specific goods 55 
7.4 Storitve prodaje na drobno v primerjavi z drugimi storitvami prodaje na drobno ali storitvami prodaje posameznega blaga na drobno 55
7.5 Retail services of specific goods versus retail services of other specific goods: similar 55 
7.5 Storitve prodaje posameznega blaga na drobno v primerjavi s storitvami prodaje drugega posameznega blaga na drobno: Podobnost 55
7.6 Services to which the same principles apply 56 
7.6 Storitve, za katere se uporabljajo enaka načela 55
7.7 Services to which the same principles do not apply 56 
7.7 Storitve, za katere se ne uporabljajo enaka načela 55
8 Financial Services 57 
8 Finančne storitve 56
8.1 Banking services (Class 36) versus insurance services (Class 36) 57 
8.1 Bančništvo (razred 36) v primerjavi z zavarovalniškimi storitvami (razred 36) 57
8.2 Real estate affairs (Class 36) versus financial affairs (Class 36) 57 
8.2 Nepremičninski posli (razred 36) v primerjavi s finančnimi storitvami (razred 36) 57
8.3 Credit cards (Class 9) versus financial services (Class 36) 58 
8.3 Kreditne kartice (razred 9) v primerjavi s finančnimi storitvami (razred 36) 58
9 Transport, Packaging and Storage 58 
9 Transport, pakiranje in skladiščenje blaga 58
9.1 Transport of goods (Class 39) versus any product 58 
9.1 Transport blaga (razred 39) v primerjavi s katerim koli proizvodom 58
10.1 Computers versus software 59 
10 Informacijska tehnologija 59
10.2 Software versus apparatus that use software 59 
10.1 Računalniki v primerjavi s programsko opremo 59
10.3 Software, downloadable ‘apps' and downloadable electronic publications 60 
10.2 Programska oprema v primerjavi z aparati, ki uporabljajo programsko opremo 59
10.4 Specific software versus specific software 60 
10.3 Programska oprema, naložljive aplikacije in naložljive elektronske publikacije 60
10.5 Computers and software (Class 9) versus computer programming (Class 42) 60 
10.4 Posebna programska oprema v primerjavi z drugo posebno programsko opremo 60
10.6 Apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction of sound or images, computers and software (Class 9) versus telecommunication services (Class 38) 61 
10.5 Računalniki in programska oprema (razred 9) v primerjavi z računalniškim programiranjem (razred 42) 60
1.1 Relevance 
Ustreznost
The comparison of goods and services is primarily of relevance for the assessment of identity according to Article 8(1)(a) EUTMR and likelihood of confusion according to Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR. 
Primerjava blaga in storitev je pomembna zlasti za presojo enakosti v skladu s členom 8(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in verjetnosti zmede v skladu s členom 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
One of the main conditions for Article 8(1)(a) EUTMR is the identity of goods/services, while Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR requires the identity or similarity of goods/services. 
Eden od glavnih pogojev iz člena 8(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je enakost blaga ali storitev, člen 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU pa zahteva enakost ali podobnost blaga ali storitev.
Consequently, if all goods/services are found to be dissimilar, one of the conditions contained in Article 8(1) EUTMR is not fulfilled and the opposition must be rejected without addressing the remaining sections of the decision . 
Če se za vse blago ali storitve ugotovi, da so različni, to pomeni, da eden od pogojev iz člena 8(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni izpolnjen in da je treba ugovor zavrniti brez obravnavanja drugih razdelkov odločbe.
[2: Equally, the comparison of goods and services is of relevance in invalidity proceedings, since pursuant to Article 60(1)(a) EUTMR, a registered European Union trade mark is declared invalid where the conditions set out in Article 8(1) EUTMR are fulfilled.] 
[2: Prav tako je primerjava blaga in storitev pomembna v postopkih za ugotavljanje ničnosti, saj se v skladu s členom 60(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU registrirana blagovna znamka Evropske unije razglasi za nično, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 8(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.]
The criteria for the assessment of identity or similarity might also play a role when proof of use has been requested and the evidence has to be assessed in order to conclude whether the opponent has proven use for the goods/services as registered. 
Merila za presojo enakosti ali podobnosti so lahko ustrezna tudi, če se zahteva dokaz o uporabi, ki ga je treba presoditi, da se ugotovi, ali je vložnik ugovora dokazal uporabo za blago ali storitve, kot so registrirani.
In particular, it is important to determine whether the goods and services for which the mark has been used belong to the category of goods and services for which the trade mark was registered. 
Zlasti je treba določiti, ali blago in storitve, za katere se uporablja znamka, spadajo v kategorijo blaga in storitev, za katere je bila blagovna znamka registrirana.
This is because, under Article 47(2) EUTMR, proof of use for a product or service that is merely similar to the one registered does not prove use for the registered product or service (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use). 
V skladu s členom 47(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se namreč šteje, da dokaz o uporabi za izdelek ali storitev, ki je le podoben oziroma podobna registriranemu izdelku ali storitvi, ne dokazuje uporabe za registrirani izdelek ali storitev (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi).
Likewise, evidence of use of goods/services might also be relevant when examining a claim to enhanced distinctiveness. 
Podobno je lahko dokazilo o uporabi blaga ali storitev pomemben tudi pri preizkusu trditve o povečanem razlikovalnem učinku.
In such cases it is often necessary to examine whether the enhanced distinctiveness covers goods/services for which the earlier trade mark enjoys protection and that are relevant for the specific case, that is to say, that have been considered to be identical or similar to the goods/services of the contested EUTM (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 5, Distinctiveness of the Earlier Mark). 
V takšnih primerih je pogosto treba preizkusiti, ali povečani razlikovalni učinek vključuje blago ali storitve, ki so zaščitene s prejšnjo blagovno znamko in so pomembne za konkreten primer, to je za katere se je štelo, da so enaki ali podobni blagu ali storitvam izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 5: Razlikovalni učinek prejšnje znamke).
Furthermore, the outcome of the comparison of goods/services plays an important role in defining the part of the public for whom likelihood of confusion is analysed because the relevant public is that of the goods/services found to be identical or similar (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 3, Relevant Public and Degree of Attention). 
Poleg tega je izid primerjave blaga ali storitev pomemben za opredelitev tistega dela javnosti, v zvezi s katerim se analizira verjetnost zmede, saj se upoštevna javnost prouči tudi za blago ali storitve, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so enaki ali podobni (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 3: Upoštevna javnost in stopnja pozornosti).
The comparison of goods/services may also be relevant under Article 8(3) EUTMR, which requires the identity or close relation or equivalence in commercial terms of goods/services (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 3, Unauthorised Filing by Agents of the TM Proprietor (Article 8(3) EUTMR)), and under the applicable provisions of national law under Article 8(4) EUTMR, since identity or similarity of the goods/services is often a condition under which the use of a subsequent trade mark may be prohibited (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 4, Rights under Article 8(4) and 8(6) EUTMR). 
Primerjava blaga ali storitev je lahko pomembna tudi na podlagi člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ki zahteva enakost ali tesno povezanost ali enakovrednost - v komercialnem smislu - blaga ali storitev (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 3: Nepooblaščena vložitev, ki jo opravijo posredniki imetnika blagovne znamke (člen 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU)), in veljavnih določb nacionalne zakonodaje v skladu s členom 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ker je enakost ali podobnost blaga ali storitev pogosto pogoj, na podlagi katerega je mogoče prepovedati uporabo poznejše blagovne znamke (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 4: Pravice iz člena 8(4) in (6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Furthermore, under Article 8(5) EUTMR, the degree of similarity or dissimilarity between the goods or services is a factor that must be taken into account when establishing whether or not the consumer will perceive a link between the marks. 
Poleg tega je v skladu s členom 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU stopnja podobnosti ali različnosti med blagom ali storitvami dejavnik, ki ga je treba upoštevati pri opredelitvi, ali bo potrošnik opazil povezavo med znamkama.
For example, the goods or services may be so manifestly dissimilar that use of the later mark on the contested goods or services is unlikely to bring the earlier mark to the mind of the relevant public (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 5, Trade Marks with Reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR)). 
Na primer, blago ali storitve so lahko tako očitno različne, da ni verjetno, da bi uporaba poznejše znamke na izpodbijanem blagu ali storitvah zadevni javnosti priklicala v spomin prejšnjo znamko (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 5: Blagovne znamke z ugledom (člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU)).
1.2 Nice Classification: a starting point 
Nicejska klasifikacija: izhodiščna točka
Article 33(1) EUTMR requires that the goods/services to be compared are classified according to the Nice Classification. 
V skladu s členom 33(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se blago ali storitve, ki se bodo primerjale, razvrstijo po Nicejski klasifikaciji.
Currently the Nice Classification consists of 34 classes (1-34) for categorising goods and 11 classes (35-45) for categorising services. 
Nicejsko klasifikacijo trenutno sestavlja 34 razredov (1-34) za razvrstitev blaga in 11 razredov (35-45) za razvrstitev storitev.
1.2.1 Its nature as a classification tool 
Njena narava kot orodje za razvrščanje
The Nice Classification was set up with the aim of harmonising national classification practices. 
Cilj vzpostavitve Nicejske klasifikacije je bil uskladiti nacionalne prakse razvrščanja.
Its first edition entered into force in 1961. 
Njena prva izdaja je začela veljati leta 1961.
Although it has undergone several revisions, it sometimes lags behind the rapid changes in product developments in the markets. 
Čeprav je bila večkrat revidirana, včasih zaostaja za hitrimi spremembami v razvoju proizvodov na trgih.
Furthermore, the wording of the headings is at times unclear and imprecise. 
Poleg tega je besedilo naslovov razredov včasih nejasno in nenatančno.
The Nice Classification serves purely administrative purposes and, as such, does not in itself provide a basis for drawing conclusions as to the similarity of goods and services. 
Nicejska klasifikacija se uporablja izključno v upravne namene in kot taka sama po sebi ne zagotavlja podlage za sprejemanje končnih ugotovitev glede podobnosti blaga in storitev.
According to Article 33(7) EUTMR, the fact that goods or services are listed in the same class of the Nice Classification is not, in itself, an indication of similarity. 
V skladu s členom 33(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU dejstvo, da so blago ali storitve navedene v istem razredu Nicejske klasifikacije, samo po sebi ne kaže na podobnost.
Examples 
Primera
Live animals are dissimilar to flowers (Class 31). 
Žive živali se razlikujejo od cvetja (razred 31).
Advertising is dissimilar to office functions (Class 35). 
Oglaševanje se razlikuje od pisarniških poslov (razred 35).
The fact that two specific goods/services fall under the same general indication of a class heading does not per se make them similar, let alone identical: cars and bicycles - although both fall under vehicles in Class 12 - are considered dissimilar. 
Dejstvo, da zadevna izdelka ali storitvi spadata pod isto splošno označbo naslova razreda, samo po sebi ne kaže na njuno podobnost, kaj šele enakost: avtomobili in kolesa - čeprav spadajo pod vozila v razredu 12 - se štejejo za različne.
Furthermore, goods/services listed in different classes are not necessarily considered dissimilar (16/12/2008, T259/06, Manso de Velasco, EU:T:2008:575, § 30-31). 
Poleg tega ni nujno, da se blago ali storitve, navedene v različnih razredih, štejejo za različne (16/12/2008, T259/06, Manso de Velasco, EU:T:2008:575, § 30-31).
Meat extracts (Class 29) are similar to spices (Class 30). 
Mesni ekstrakti (razred 29) so podobni začimbam (razred 30).
Travel arrangement (Class 39) is similar to providing temporary accommodation (Class 43). 
Organizacija potovanj (razred 39) je podobna nudenju začasne nastanitve (razred 43).
1.2.2 Its structure and methodology 
Njena struktura in metodologija
Classification may serve as a tool to identify the common characteristics of certain goods/services. 
Razvrstitev se lahko uporablja kot orodje za opredelitev skupnih značilnosti nekaterega blaga ali storitev.
Many classes of the Nice Classification are structured according to factors such as function, composition and/or purpose of use, which may be relevant in the comparison of goods/services. 
Številni razredi Nicejske klasifikacije so strukturirani po dejavnikih, kot so funkcija, sestava in/ali namen uporabe, ki so lahko pomembni pri primerjavi blaga ali storitev.
Class 1 comprises chemical goods based primarily on their chemical properties (nature), rather than on their specific application. 
V razred 1 so vključeni kemični proizvodi, prvenstveno na podlagi njihovih kemijskih lastnosti (narave), in ne na podlagi njihove specifične uporabe.
By contrast, Class 3 covers all items that are either cleaning preparations or for personal hygiene or beautification. 
Nasprotno pa razred 3 vključuje vse proizvode, ki so ali čistila ali izdelki za osebno higieno ali ličila.
Although they can by their nature also be classified as chemical products, it is their specific purpose that allows a distinction and thus a different classification. 
Čeprav bi jih bilo mogoče po njihovi naravi uvrstiti tudi kot kemične proizvode, njihov točno določen namen omogoča razlikovanje in tako različno razvrstitev.