natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such banal elements are considered non-distinctive, and their omission does not change the distinctive character of the sign. 
Takšni vsakdanji elementi se štejejo za nerazlikovalne, njihova opustitev pa ne spremeni razlikovalnega značaja znaka.
Therefore, it is important to establish which elements influence the distinctive character of the mark and how consumers will perceive them. 
Zato je treba opredeliti, kateri elementi vplivajo na razlikovalni značaj znamke in kako jih bodo zaznavali potrošniki.
The omission of the transliteration of a term is generally considered as an acceptable alteration. 
Opustitev prečrkovanja izraza se na splošno šteje za sprejemljivo spremembo.
Unacceptable omissions 
Nesprejemljive opustitve
In cases where the figurative element is the dominant or distinctive element and not merely decorative or banal, its omission can alter the distinctive character of the sign. 
Kadar je figurativni element prevladujoč ali razlikovalen in ne le okrasen ali vsakdanji, lahko njegova opustitev spremeni razlikovalni značaj znaka.
2.7.3.3 Other alterations 
Druge spremembe
Acceptable alterations 
Sprejemljive spremembe
Word marks 
Besedne znamke
Word marks are considered used as registered regardless of typeface, use of upper/lower case or colour. 
Šteje se, da se besedne znamke uporabljajo, kot so bile registrirane, ne glede na pisavo, uporabo velikih/malih črk ali barvo.
It would not be correct to analyse this type of use from the perspective of whether distinctive character is altered. 
Analiza tovrstne uporabe z vidika spremembe razlikovalnega značaja ne bi bila primerna.
However, a very particular typeface (highly stylised) may lead to a different conclusion. 
Vendar lahko zelo posebna pisava (zelo stilizirana) privede do drugačne ugotovitve.
Changing the letter size or switching between upper/lower case is customary when using word marks. 
Pri uporabi besednih znamk je običajno spreminjati velikost črk ali izmenično uporabljati velike in male črke.
Therefore, such use is considered use of the registered mark. 
Zato se takšna uporaba upošteva kot uporaba registrirane znamke.
Word marks are registered in black and white. 
Besedne znamke so registrirane v črni in beli barvi.
It is customary to use marks in colour. 
Običajno je, da se znamke uporabljajo v barvah.
Such use does not constitute a variant but use of the registered mark. 
Takšna uporaba ne pomeni uporabe različice, temveč uporabo registrirane znamke.
Figurative marks 
Figurativne znamke
Using a purely figurative mark (without word elements) in a form other than registered often constitutes an unacceptable alteration. 
Uporaba le figurativne znamke (brez besednih elementov) v obliki, ki ni registrirana oblika, na splošno pomeni nesprejemljivo spremembo.
In the case of composite marks (i.e. marks composed of word and figurative elements), changes to certain figurative elements do not normally affect the distinctive character of the marks. 
V primeru sestavljenih znamk (tj. znamk, sestavljenih iz besednih in figurativnih elementov), spremembe nekaterih figurativnih elementov običajno ne vplivajo na razlikovalni značaj znamk.
This is particularly relevant in cases where the figurative element is mainly descriptive of the relevant goods and services. 
To je še zlasti pomembno v primerih, kadar figurativni element predvsem opisuje zadevno blago in storitve.
This is also the case where the dominant elements remain unchanged (24/11/2005, T135/04, Online Bus, EU:T:2005:419 above). 
To velja tudi, če prevladujoči elementi ostanejo nespremenjeni (zgoraj navedena sodba 24/11/2005, T135/04, Online Bus, EU:T:2005:419).
For alterations in colour specifically, the main question that needs to be addressed is whether the mark as used alters the distinctive character of the registered mark, that is to say whether use of the mark in colour, while being registered in black and white or greyscale (and vice versa) constitutes an alteration of the registered form. 
Kar zadeva konkretno barvne spremembe, je glavno vprašanje, ki ga je treba obravnavati, ali znamka, kot se uporablja, spreminja razlikovalni značaj registrirane znamke, in sicer ali uporaba znamke v barvah, čeprav je registrirana v črno-beli barvi ali sivinah (in obratno), pomeni spremembo registrirane oblike.
The Office and a number of IP offices of the European Union have agreed on a common practice under the European Trade Mark and Designs Network, whereby a change only in colour does not alter the distinctive character of the trade mark as long as: 
Urad in številni uradi za intelektualno lastnino iz Evropske unije so v okviru Evropske mreže blagovnih znamk in modelov sprejeli skupno prakso, v skladu s katero sprememba le barve ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja blagovne znamke, če:
the word/figurative elements coincide and are the main distinctive elements; 
se besedni/figurativni elementi skladajo in so glavni razlikovalni elementi,
the contrast of shades is respected; 
je upoštevan kontrast senc,
the colour or combination of colours does not have distinctive character in itself; 
barva ali kombinacija barv sama po sebi nima razlikovalnega značaja,
the colour is not one of the main contributors to the overall distinctiveness of the sign. 
barva ni eden od dejavnikov, ki pomembno prispevajo k splošnemu razlikovalnemu učinku znaka.
3D marks 
Tridimenzionalne znamke
The use of a 3D mark in varying sizes usually amounts to use of the mark as registered. 
Uporaba tridimenzionalne znamke v različnih velikostih pomeni uporabo znamke, kot je bila registrirana.
The addition of a word/figurative element to such a mark does not generally alter the distinctive character of the sign. 
Besedni/figurativni element, ki je dodan k takšni znamki, na splošno ne spremeni razlikovalnega značaja znaka.
Colour marks 
Barvne znamke
Colour marks are marks consisting of one or more colours. 
Barvne znamke so znamke, ki zajemajo eno ali več barv.
Where the mark is a colour combination, the registration must indicate the proportion of each colour and specify how they will appear. 
Če je znamka barvna kombinacija, je treba v registraciji navesti delež vsake barve in podrobno opredeliti, kako bodo prikazane.
Colour marks must be used with the colours as registered. 
Barvne znamke je treba uporabljati z barvami, ki so bile registrirane.
Insignificant variations in the colour shade and strength will not alter distinctive character. 
Nepomembne razlike v odtenku in intenzivnosti barv ne bodo spremenile razlikovalnega značaja.
Where a colour combination is registered without specifying the respective proportions, use in varying proportions will not affect distinctive character. 
Če je barvna kombinacija registrirana brez podrobne opredelitve zadevnih deležev, uporaba v različnih razmerjih ne bo vplivala na razlikovalni značaj.
The case is different when particular proportions were claimed and these are substantially altered in the variant as used. 
To ne velja, če so bili opredeljeni posebni deleži, ki so bili bistveno spremenjeni v različici, ki se uporablja.
Where a colour or colour combination is registered, use in combination with a distinctive or descriptive word will not affect distinctive character. 
Če je registrirana barva ali barvna kombinacija, uporaba v kombinaciji z razlikovalno ali opisno besedo ne bo vplivala na razlikovalni značaj.
See, by analogy, the Court judgment below regarding the proof of acquired distinctiveness of a mark (examination). 
Glej po analogiji v nadaljevanju navedeno sodbo Sodišča v zvezi z dokazom o pridobljenem razlikovalnem učinku znamke (preizkus).
Unacceptable alterations 
Nesprejemljive spremembe
Where a mark is composed of several elements, only one or some of which are distinctive, that have rendered the mark as a whole registrable, an alteration of that element or its omission or replacement by another element will generally mean that the distinctive character is altered. 
Če je znamka sestavljena iz več elementov, od katerih je le eden razlikovalen ali pa jih je razlikovalnih več in tako omogočajo, da je mogoče znamko kot celoto registrirati, bo sprememba navedenega elementa ali njegova opustitev ali nadomestitev z drugim elementom na splošno pomenila, da je razlikovalni značaj spremenjen.
2.8 Use for the goods or services for which the mark is registered 
Uporaba za blago ali storitve, za katere je znamka registrirana
In accordance with Article 18 EUTMR, the mark must be used for the goods or services for which it is registered in order to be enforceable. 
V skladu s členom 18 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je treba znamko, da bi bila zaščitena, uporabljati za blago ali storitve, za katere je registrirana.
In accordance with the first sentence of Article 47(2) EUTMR, the earlier registered mark must have been put to genuine use in connection with the goods or services in respect of which it is registered and which the opponent cites as justification for its opposition. 
V skladu s prvim stavkom člena 47(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se je morala prejšnja registrirana znamka resno in dejansko uporabljati za blago ali storitve, za katere je registrirana in ki jih vložnik ugovora navaja kot razlog za ugovor.
As the General Court stated in the Aladin case: 
Dejansko določbe člena 43 Uredbe št.
The provisions of Article 43 of Regulation No 40/94 [now Article 47 EUTMR] allowing an earlier trade mark to be deemed to be registered only in relation to the part of the goods or services in respect of which genuine use of the mark has been established (i) are a limitation on the rights which the proprietor of the earlier trade mark gains from his registration …, and (ii) must be reconciled with the legitimate interest of the proprietor in being able in the future to extend his range of goods or services, within the confines of the terms describing the goods or services for which the trade mark was registered, by using the protection which registration of the trade mark confers on him. 
40/94 [zdaj člen 47 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU] s tem, da dopuščajo, da se prejšnja znamka upošteva kot registrirana samo za del proizvodov in storitev, za katere je bila dokazana resna in dejanska uporaba znamke, po eni strani omejujejo pravice, ki jih ima imetnik prejšnje znamke na podlagi njene registracije, […] po drugi strani pa morajo biti usklajene z legitimnim interesom, do katerega ima navedeni imetnik pravico, da v bodoče razširi svoj obseg proizvodov ali storitev v mejah pojmov, ki določajo proizvode ali storitve, za katere je bila blagovna znamka registrirana, s tem da je deležen varstva, ki mu ga podeljuje registracija navedene blagovne znamke.
That is particularly so when, as here, the goods and services for which the trade mark has been registered form a sufficiently narrowly-defined category. 
To toliko bolj velja za primer, kadar, kot v obravnavani zadevi, proizvodi in storitve, za katere je bila znamka registrirana, sestavljajo dovolj omejeno [kategorijo]
(14/07/2005, T126/03, Aladin, EU:T:2005:288, § 51, emphasis added.) 
(14/07/2005, T126/03, Aladin, EU:T:2005:288, § 51, dodan poudarek).
The analysis of genuine use must in principle extend to all of the registered goods and/or services on which the opposition is based and for which the EUTM applicant has made an explicit request for proof of use. 
Analiza resne in dejanske uporabe mora načeloma zajemati vse registrirano blago in/ali storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor in za katere je prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU vložil izrecno zahtevo za dokaz o uporabi.
However, in situations where it is clear that likelihood of confusion can be established on the basis of some of the earlier goods and/or services, the Office's analysis of genuine use need not extend to all the earlier goods and/or services but instead may focus on only those goods and/or services sufficient for establishing identity/similarity to the contested goods and/or services. 
Kadar pa je jasno, da je mogoče verjetnost zmede opredeliti na podlagi nekaterega prejšnjega blaga in/ali storitev, ni potrebno, da analiza Urada glede resne in dejanske uporabe zajema vse prejšnje blago in/ali storitve, temveč je lahko osredotočena samo na tisto blago in/ali storitve, ki zadostujejo za ugotovitev enakosti/podobnosti z izpodbijanim blagom in/ali storitvami.
In other words, since likelihood of confusion can be established on the basis of a finding of genuine use for some of the earlier goods and/or services, it is unnecessary to examine the evidence of use submitted by the opponent with respect to the remaining earlier goods and/or services. 
Z drugimi besedami, ker je mogoče verjetnost zmede opredeliti na podlagi ugotovitve resne in dejanske uporabe za nekatero prejšnje blago in/ali storitve, ni treba proučiti dokazov o uporabi, ki jih predloži vložnik ugovora v zvezi s preostalim prejšnjim blagom in/ali storitvami.
The following sections include a number of guidelines to help establish whether the earlier trade mark has been effectively used for the registered goods and services. 
V naslednjih razdelkih je na voljo več smernic, s katerimi bo mogoče lažje opredeliti, ali se je prejšnja blagovna znamka dejansko uporabljala za registrirano blago in storitve.
For further details, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 2, Comparison of Goods and Services and, in particular, the practice regarding the use of all the general indications in the class heading, and the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 3, Classification. 
Za dodatne podrobnosti glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 2: Primerjava blaga in storitev, zlasti prakso v zvezi z uporabo splošnih označb v naslovih razredov, in Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 3: Razvrstitev blaga in storitev.
2.8.1 Comparison between goods/services used and specification of goods/services 
Primerjava uporabljenega blaga/storitev in njihova specifikacija
It must always be carefully assessed whether the goods and services for which the mark has been used fall within the category of the registered goods and services. 
Vedno je treba skrbno presoditi, ali blago in storitve, za katere se znamka uporablja, spadajo v kategorijo registriranega blaga in storitev.
2.8.2 Relevance of the classification 
Pomen razvrstitve
It is relevant to establish whether the specific goods or services for which a mark has been used fall under any general indication listed in the class heading of a particular class of goods or services, and if so, which. 
Opredeliti je treba, ali določeno blago ali storitve, za katere se je uporabljala blagovna znamka, spadajo pod katero od splošnih označb, zapisanih v naslovu razreda posebnega razreda blaga ali storitev, in če je odgovor pritrdilen, katero.
For instance, in Class 25, the class heading is clothing, footwear, headgear, and each of these three items constitutes a ‘general indication'. 
Na primer, v razredu 25 je naslov razreda oblačila, obutev in pokrivala, vsaka od teh treh postavk pa je splošna označba.
Whereas, in general, classification does not serve more than administrative purposes, it is relevant, in order to assess the nature of the use, to establish whether the goods for which a mark has been used fall under the general indication of clothing, footwear, headgear. 
Čeprav se razvrstitev na splošno uporablja v upravne namene, je za presojo narave uporabe pomembna opredelitev, ali blago, za katero se je znamka uporabljala, spada pod splošno označbo oblačila, obutev ali pokrivala.
This is apparent when similar categories of goods have been classified differently for certain reasons. 
To je jasno, kadar so podobne kategorije blaga razvrščene drugače iz določenih razlogov.
For instance, shoes have been classified in various classes according to their intended purpose: orthopaedic shoes in Class 10 and ordinary shoes in Class 25. 
Na primer, obutev je bila razvrščena v različne razrede glede na svoj namen: ortopedska obutev v razred 10 in navadna obutev v razred 25.
It must be established, according to the evidence provided, to which kind of shoes the use relates. 
V skladu s predloženimi dokazi je treba opredeliti, na katero vrsto obutve se nanaša uporaba.
2.8.3 Use and registration for general indications in ‘class headings' 
Uporaba in registracija za splošne označbe v naslovih razredov
Where a mark is registered under all or part of the general indications listed in the class heading of a particular class and where it has been used for several goods or services that are properly classified in the same class under one of these general indications, the mark will be considered as having been used for that specific general indication. 
Če je znamka registrirana pod vsemi ali nekaterimi splošnimi označbami, zapisanimi v naslovu določenega razreda, in če se je uporabljala za več vrst blaga ali storitev, ki so ustrezno razvrščene v isti razred pod eno od teh splošnih označb, se bo štelo, da se je blagovna znamka uporabljala za navedeno specifično splošno označbo.
Example: The earlier mark is registered for clothing, footwear, headgear in Class 25. 
Primer: Prejšnja znamka je registrirana za oblačila, obutev, pokrivala iz razreda 25.
The evidence relates to ‘skirts', ‘trousers' and ‘Tshirts'. 
Dokazi se nanašajo na krila, hlače in majice s kratkimi rokavi.
Conclusion: The mark has been used for clothing. 
Sklepna ugotovitev: Znamka se je uporabljala za oblačila.
On the other hand, when a mark is registered for only part of the general indications listed in the class heading of a particular class but has been used only for goods or services which fall under another general indication of that same class, the mark will not be considered as having been used for the registered goods or services (see also paragraph 2.8.4 below). 
Po drugi strani, če je znamka registrirana le za del splošnih označb, navedenih v naslovu določenega razreda, vendar se je uporabljala le za blago ali storitve, ki spadajo pod drugo splošno označbo v istem razredu, se ne bo štelo, da se je znamka uporabljala za registrirano blago ali storitve (glej tudi odstavek 2.8.4 v nadaljevanju).
Example: The earlier mark is registered for clothing in Class 25. 
Primer: Prejšnja znamka je registrirana za oblačila iz razreda 25.
The evidence relates to ‘boots' only. 
Dokazi se nanašajo le na škornje.
Conclusion: The mark has not been used for the goods for which it is registered. 
Sklepna ugotovitev: Znamka se ni uporabljala za blago, za katero je registrirana.
2.8.4 Use for subcategories of goods/services and similar goods/services 
Uporaba za podkategorije blaga/storitev in podobnega blaga/storitev
This part deals with the extent of protection granted where there is use for subcategories of goods and of ‘similar' goods (or services). 
V tem delu je obravnavan obseg odobrenega varstva v primeru uporabe za podkategorije blaga in podobnega blaga (ali storitev).
In general, it is not appropriate to accept proof of use for ‘different' but somehow ‘linked' goods or services as automatically covering registered goods and services. 
Na splošno ni ustrezno sprejeti dokaza o uporabi za drugačno, vendar nekako povezano blago ali storitve, ki bi samodejno zajemal registrirano blago in storitve.
In particular, the concept of similarity of goods and services is not a valid consideration within this context. 
Zlasti pojem podobnost blaga in storitev ni tehten razlog v zvezi s tem.
The third sentence of Article 47(2) EUTMR does not provide any exception in this regard. 
V tretjem stavku člena 47(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU glede tega ni predvidena nikakršna izjema.
2.8.4.1 Earlier mark registered for broad category of goods/services 
Prejšnja znamka, registrirana za široko kategorijo blaga/storitev
In the Aladin case, the General Court held: 
Splošno sodišče je v zadevi Aladin razsodilo:
if a trade mark has been registered for a category of goods or services which is sufficiently broad for it to be possible to identify within it a number of sub-categories capable of being viewed independently, proof that the mark has been put to genuine use in relation to a part of those goods or services affords protection, in opposition proceedings, only for the sub-category or sub-categories to which the goods or services for which the trade mark has actually been used belong. 
[…] če je bila blagovna znamka registrirana za dovolj široko kategorijo proizvodov ali storitev, ki bi se lahko v njej razporedili v več podkategorij, ki bi se lahko upoštevale samostojno, dokaz resne in dejanske uporabe znamke za del teh proizvodov ali storitev v postopku z ugovorom daje varstvo samo tej ali podkategorijam, ki navajajo proizvode ali storitve, za katere je bila blagovna znamka dejansko uporabljena
Therefore, if the earlier mark has been registered for a broad category of goods or services but the opponent provides evidence of use only for specific goods or services falling within this category, this raises the question of whether the submitted evidence is to be regarded strictly as proof of use only for the particular goods or services, which are not mentioned as such in the list of goods or services, or for the broad category as specified in the registration. 
Če je bila prejšnja znamka registrirana za široko kategorijo blaga ali storitev, vendar vložnik ugovora predloži dokaze o uporabi le za posebno blago ali storitve, ki spadajo v to kategorijo, se zato postavlja vprašanje, ali je treba predložene dokaze strogo obravnavati kot dokaz o uporabi le za posebno blago ali storitve, ki kot taki niso navedeni na seznamu blaga ali storitev, ali za široko kategorijo, kot je navedena v registraciji.
The General Court further pointed out, on the one hand, that it is necessary to interpret the last sentence of Article 47(2) EUTMR as seeking to deny a trade mark extensive protection, if it has only been used in relation to part of the goods or services for which it is registered, merely because it has been registered for a wide range of goods or services. 
Splošno sodišče je poudarilo še, da je treba po eni strani zadnji stavek člena 47(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU razlagati tako, kot da se z njim želi preprečiti, da bi blagovna znamka, ki se je uporabljala le za del blaga ali storitev, za katere je registrirana, uživala obsežno varstvo le zato, ker je bila registrirana za velik obseg blaga ali storitev.
Therefore, it is necessary to take account of the breadth of the categories of goods or services for which the earlier mark is registered, in particular the extent to which the categories concerned are described in general terms for registration purposes, and to do so in the light of the goods or services for which genuine use has actually been established (paragraph 44). 
Zato je treba upoštevati tudi obseg kategorij proizvodov ali storitev, za katere je prejšnja blagovna znamka registrirana, zlasti obseg, v katerem so bile kategorije v zvezi z registracijo na splošno opisane, in to storiti za blago ali storitve, katerih resna in dejanska uporaba je bila dejansko dokazana (točka 44).
On the other hand, it is not necessary for the opponent to file evidence of all the commercial variations of similar goods or services but merely of those goods or services that are sufficiently distinct to constitute coherent categories or subcategories (paragraph 46). 
Po drugi strani vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti dokazov za vse tržne različice podobnega blaga ali storitev, ampak samo proizvode ali storitve, ki so dovolj različni, da lahko oblikujejo koherentne kategorije ali podkategorije (točka 46).
The underlying reason is that in practice it is impossible for the proprietor of a trade mark to prove that the mark has been used for all conceivable variations of the goods concerned by the registration. 
Osnovni razlog je, da je praktično nemogoče, da bi imetnik blagovne znamke dokazal uporabo te znamke za vse mogoče različice blaga, ki jih zajema registracija.
Thus, protection is available only for the subcategory or subcategories to which the used goods or services belong if: 
Zato je varstvo na voljo le za podkategorijo ali več podkategorij, v katere spadajo uporabljeno blago in storitve, če:
1. a trade mark has been registered for a category of goods or services: 
je bila blagovna znamka registrirana za kategorijo blaga ali storitev: