natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
16/11/2011, T308/06, Buffalo Milke, EU:T:2011:675 Nine invoices dated between April 2001 and March 2002, representing sales of around EUR 1 600 (with a turnover figure barely above EUR 1 000 000 per year) and showing that items were delivered to different customers in small quantities (12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 or 144 pieces), for widely used products like shoe polish, in the largest European market, Germany, with approximately 80 million potential consumers, were deemed as providing evidence of use that objectively is such as to create or preserve an outlet for polishing cream and leather conditioner. 
16/11/2011, T308/06, Buffalo Milke, EU:T:2011:675 Štelo se je, da devet računov iz obdobja med aprilom 2001 in marcem 2002, ki so se nanašali na prodajo v višini približno 1 600 EUR (z letnim prometom, ki je komaj presegel 1 000 000 EUR) in iz katerih je bilo razvidno, da so bili izdelki dobavljeni v majhnih količinah (12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 ali 144 kosov) različnim strankam, in sicer za proizvode, kot so loščila za čevlje, ki se veliko uporabljajo na največjem evropskem trgu, to je v Nemčiji, ki ima približno 80 milijonov potencialnih potrošnikov, zagotavlja dokaz o uporabi, ki je objektivno primerno za ustvarjanje ali ohranjanje trga za polirne kreme in kreme za usnje.
Furthermore, the volume of sales, in relation to the period and frequency of use, was deemed to be significant enough not to be considered merely token, minimal or notional for the sole purpose of preserving the rights conferred by the mark. 
Poleg tega se je štelo, da je obseg prodaje glede na trajanje in pogostost uporabe dovolj velik, da se ne šteje za le simbolično, minimalno ali navidezno uporabo z edinim ciljem ohranjanja pravic, ki izhajajo iz znamke.
Confirmed by the General Court (para. 68) 
Potrjena s sodbo Splošnega sodišča (točka 68).
10/09/2008, T325/06, Capio, EU:T:2008:338 Evidence (invoices, lists of sales) proving that the intervener sold 4 hollow-fibre oxygenators with detachable hard-shell reservoirs in Finland in 1998, 105 in 1999 and 12 in 2001, for a total amount of EUR 19 901.76, was deemed sufficient proof of genuine use of the EUTM registered for oxygenators with integrated pump; controllers for integrated pump; regulating devices of air pressure for integrated pump; suction pumps; blood flow meters in Class 10 (paras 48, 60). 
10/09/2008, T325/06, Capio, EU:T:2008:338 Dokazi (računi, seznami prodaje), iz katerih je bilo razvidno, da je intervenientka na Finskem leta 1998 prodala štiri oksigenatorje iz votlih vlaken z odstranljivimi trdimi tanki, leta 1999 105 in leta 2001 12 v skupni vrednosti 19 901,76 EUR, so se šteli za zadosten dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi blagovne znamke EU, registrirane za oksigenatorje z vgrajeno črpalko; krmilnike za vgrajene črpalke; naprave za reguliranje zračnega tlaka za vgrajene črpalke; črpalke; merilnike krvnega pretoka iz razreda 10 (točki 48 in 60).
27/09/2007, T418/03, La Mer, EU:T:2007:299 Ten invoices over a period of 33 months, relating to several product ranges, the packaging of which bears the trade mark concerned, with numbers very far apart (22 214 for the invoice of 03/01/1995, 24 085 for that of 04/05/1995, 24 135 for that of 10/05/1995 and 31 348 for that of 26/03/1997), showing that the sales were made to different persons, were deemed as permitting the inference that they had been submitted merely by way of illustration of total sales but not as showing that the trade mark was used publicly and outwardly rather than solely within the undertaking that owned the earlier trade mark or within a distribution network owned or controlled by that undertaking. 
27/09/2007, T418/03, La Mer, EU:T:2007:299 Štelo se je, da deset računov iz 33-mesečnega obdobja v zvezi z več vrstami proizvodov, katerih embalaža je označena z zadevno blagovno znamko, na katerih so navedene zelo raznolike številke (22 214 za račun z dne 3. januarja 1995, 24 085 za račun z dne 4. maja 1995, 24 135 za račun z dne 10. maja 1995 in 31 348 za račun z dne 26. marca 1997) in ki kažejo, da je prodaja potekala z različnimi osebami, omogoča sklepanje, da so bili predloženi le za ponazoritev celotnega obsega prodaje in ne kot dokaz o tem, da se blagovna znamka uporablja javno in zunanje, in ne le v podjetju, ki je imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke, ali v distribucijskem omrežju, ki ga ima to podjetje v lasti ali ga nadzira.
Nevertheless, the sales effected, while not considerable, were deemed as constituting use that objectively was such as to create or preserve an outlet for the products concerned and entailing a volume of sales that, in relation to the period and frequency of use, was not so low as to allow the conclusion that the use was merely token, minimal or notional for the sole purpose of preserving the rights conferred by the mark (paras 87-90). 
Kljub temu se je štelo, da ustvarjena prodaja, čeprav ni bila velika, pomeni uporabo, ki je objektivno primerna za ustvarjanje ali ohranjanje trga za zadevne proizvode in zajema obseg prodaje, ki glede na obdobje in pogostost uporabe ni tako majhen, da bi lahko privedel do ugotovitve, da gre za le simbolično, minimalno ali navidezno uporabo z edinim ciljem ohranjanja pravic, ki izhajajo iz blagovne znamke (točke od 87 do 90).
25/03/2009, T191/07, Budweiser, EU:T:2009:83 The Board of Appeal (20/03/2007, R 299/20062, ‘BUDWEISER/BUDWEISER BUDVAR (fig.) et al., § 26) found essentially that the documents presented to it during the administrative proceedings - invoices proving the sale of beer in France amounting to more than 40 000 litres between October 1997 and April 1999, 23 invoices issued in Austria between 1993 and 2000 to a single buyer in Austria, and 14 invoices issued in Germany between 1993 and 1997 - were sufficient to demonstrate the extent of use of the earlier international word mark BUDWEISER (IR No 238 203) in those countries. 
25/03/2009, T191/07, Budweiser, EU:T:2009:83 Odbor za pritožbe (20/03/2007, R 299/20062, ‘BUDWEISER/BUDWEISER BUDVAR (fig.) et al., § 26) je v bistvu menil, da so dokumenti, ki so mu bili predloženi med upravnim postopkom - računi, ki dokazujejo prodajo piva v Franciji v skupni količini več kot 40 000 litrov med oktobrom 1997 in aprilom 1999, 23 računov, izdanih v Avstriji med letoma 1993 in 2000 enemu kupcu, in 14 računov, izdanih v Nemčiji med letoma 1993 in 1997 -, zadoščali za dokaz obsega uporabe prejšnje mednarodne besedne znamke BUDWEISER (mednarodna registracija št.
11/05/2006, C416/04 P, Vitafruit, EU:C:2006:310 Evidence of the sale to a single customer in Spain of concentrated fruit juices during a period of 11.5 months, with a total volume of sales of EUR 4 800, corresponding to the sale of 293 cases of 12 items each, was considered sufficient use of the earlier Spanish trade mark (paras 68-77). 
11/05/2006, C416/04 P, Vitafruit, EU:C:2006:310 Štelo se je, da dokazi o prodaji koncentriranih sadnih sokov eni stranki v Španiji v 11 mesecih in pol s celotnim obsegom prodaje 4 800 EUR, kar ustreza prodaji 293 zabojev po 12 kosov, pomenijo zadostno uporabo prejšnje španske blagovne znamke (točke 68-77).
08/07/2010, T30/09, Peerstorm, EU:T:2010:298 As evidence of use, the opponent (merely) provided several catalogues for end consumers, featuring the relevant trade mark on clothing articles. 
08/07/2010, T30/09, Peerstorm, EU:T:2010:298 Vložnik ugovora je kot dokaz o uporabi predložil (le) več katalogov za končne potrošnike, v katerih so bila oblačila označena z zadevno blagovno znamko.
The Court held that ‘…it is true that those catalogues provide no information on the quantity of goods actually sold by the intervener under the trade mark PETER STORM. 
Sodišče je menilo, da „[…] je res, da ti katalogi ne zagotavljajo podatkov o količini proizvodov, ki jih je intervenientka dejansko prodala pod znamko PETER STORM.
However, it is necessary to take into account … the fact that a large number of items designated by the trade mark PETER STORM were offered in the catalogues and that those items were available in more than 240 shops in the United Kingdom for a significant part of the relevant period. 
Vendar je treba […] upoštevati, da je bilo zelo veliko proizvodov, označenih z znamko PETER STORM, ponujenih v katalogih in da so bili ti proizvodi na voljo v več kot 240 trgovinah v Združenem kraljestvu v velikem delu upoštevnega obdobja.
Those factors support the conclusion, in the context of a global assessment … that the extent of its use was fairly significant' (paras 42 to 43). 
Na podlagi teh dokazov je v okviru celovite presoje […] mogoče sklepati o precej velikem obsegu uporabe“ (točki 42 in 43).
04/09/2007, R 35/20072, DINKY The sale of approximately 1 000 miniature toy vehicles was considered sufficient extent of use in light of the products being sold mainly to collectors at a high price in a particular market. 
04/09/2007, R 35/20072, DINKY Prodaja približno 1 000 miniaturnih avtomobilčkov se je štela za zadosten obseg uporabe, ker so se proizvodi v glavnem prodajali zbirateljem po visoki ceni na določenem trgu.
11/10/2010, R 571/20091, VitAmour / VITALARMOR The sale of 500 kg of milk proteins for a total value of EUR 11 000 was considered sufficient to prove genuine use for milk proteins for human consumption. 
11/10/2010, R 571/20091, VitAmour / VITALARMOR Prodaja 500 kg mlečnih beljakovin v skupni vrednosti 11 000 EUR se je štela za zadosten dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi za mlečne beljakovine za človeško prehrano.
In view of the nature of the products, which are not consumer goods but ingredients for use by the food processing industry, the amount and values shown did demonstrate a market presence above the threshold required. 
Zaradi značilnosti proizvodov, ki niso potrošniško blago, temveč sestavine za uporabo v živilskopredelovalni industriji, so izkazana količina in vrednosti dokazale tržno prisotnost nad zahtevanim pragom.
27/07/2011, R 1123/20104, Duracryl / DURATINT et al. Eleven invoices made out to different undertakings in various regions of Spain, showing that the proprietor of the mark sold, in the relevant period and under the mark, 311 containers of the product, in different sizes, for a net amount of EUR 2 684, were deemed sufficient to prove genuine use of a mark registered for preservatives against deterioration of wood in Class 2. 
27/07/2011, R 1123/20104, Duracryl / DURATINT et al. Štelo se je, da enajst računov, ki so bili izdani različnim podjetjem iz različnih španskih regij in iz katerih je razvidno, da je imetnik blagovne znamke v upoštevnem obdobju in pod zadevno znamko prodal 311 škatel proizvoda različnih velikosti za neto znesek 2 684 EUR, zadostuje za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi blagovne znamke, registrirane za pripravke za preprečevanje razkroja lesa iz razreda 2.
01/02/2011, B 1 563 066 An annual turnover of more than EUR 10 million over several years was claimed for medical preparations. 
01/02/2011, B 1 563 066 Za medicinske preparate je bil prijavljen letni promet nad 10 milijonov EUR v obdobju več let.
The corresponding invoices (one per relevant year) only proved actual sales of about EUR 20 per year. 
Iz ustreznih računov (eden na upoštevno leto) je bila razvidna le dejanska prodaja v višini približno 20 EUR na leto.
In an overall assessment, and in the context of further material submitted, such as price lists, a sworn statement, packaging and advertising material, the Office found this sufficient to prove genuine use. 
Urad je v okviru celovite presoje in na podlagi predloženega dodatnega gradiva, ki je zajemalo cenike, zapriseženo izjavo, embalažo in oglaševalsko gradivo, menil, da to zadostuje za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi.
26/01/2001, B 150 039 The Opposition Division regarded evidence of sales of around 2 000 furry toy animals in a high-priced market sector as sufficient. 
26/01/2001, B 150 039 Oddelek za ugovore je menil, da so dokazi o prodaji približno 2 000 plišastih igrač v visokocenovnem tržnem sektorju zadostni.
18/06/2001, B 167 488 The opponent submitted one invoice referring to the sale of one high-precision laser cutting machine for FRF 565 000, a catalogue describing its performance and some photographs depicting the product. 
18/06/2001, B 167 488 Vložnik ugovora je predložil račun, ki se je nanašal na prodajo enega stroja za visoko natančno lasersko rezanje v znesku 565 000 FRF, katalog, v katerem je opisano njegovo delovanje, in nekaj fotografij proizvoda.
The Opposition Division considered them as sufficient evidence taking into account the nature of the product, the specific market and its considerably high price. 
Oddelek za ugovore je glede na značilnosti proizvoda, specifični trg in visoko ceno proizvoda menil, da so to zadostni dokazi.
Case No Registered mark Actual use Comment 
Št. zadeve Registrirana blagovna znamka Dejanska uporaba Pripomba
12/12/2014, T105/13, TrinkFix Drinkfit Relevant goods were beverages in Classes 29 and 32. 
12/12/2014, T105/13, TrinkFix Drinkfit Zadevno blago so bile pijače iz razredov 29 in 32.
The labels on bottles of beverages are narrow, so it is not unusual for a word mark to be written on two lines (para. 47). 
Etikete na steklenicah pijač so ozke, zato ni nenavadno, da je blagovna znamka zapisana v dveh vrsticah (točka 47).
Registered form Actual use Case No 
Registrirana oblika Dejanska uporaba Št. zadeve
‘In the present case the mark CRISTAL appears clearly four times on the neck of the bottle marketed by the intervener and twice on the main label, accompanied by the symbol ®. 
„V tem primeru se znamka CRISTAL jasno pojavi štirikrat na vratu buteljke, ki jo trži intervenient, in dvakrat na glavni označbi skupaj z simbolom ®.
On the neck, that mark is separate from the other elements. 
Na vratu se nahaja ločeno od drugih elementov.
In addition, the mark CRISTAL appears alone on the boxes in which bottles of the mark CRISTAL are marketed. 
V škatlah, v katerih se tržijo buteljke znamke CRISTAL, se pojavi samo znamka CRISTAL.
Equally, on the invoices produced by the intervener reference is made to the term “cristal” with the mention “1990 coffret”. 
Enako se na računih intervenienta navaja samo izraz ,cristal‘ skupaj z navedbo ,škatla 1990‘.
It should be noted that the mark CRISTAL thus identifies the product marketed by the intervener' (para. 35). 
Treba je poudariti, da znamka CRISTAL tako določa proizvod, ki ga trži intervenient“ (točka 35).
‘As regards the mention “Louis Roederer” on the main label, it merely indicates the name of the manufacturer's company, which may provide a direct link between one or more product lines and a specific undertaking. 
„Navedba ,Louis Roederer‘, ki se pojavlja na glavni označbi, preprosto označuje firmo proizvajalca, kar lahko vzpostavi neposredno vez med eno ali več vrst proizvodov in določenim podjetjem.
The same reasoning applies to the group of letters “lr”, which represents the initials of the intervener's name. 
Enako utemeljevanje velja za črki ,lr‘, ki predstavljata začetnici imena intervenienta.
As pointed out by [the Office], joint use of those elements on the same bottle does not undermine the function of the mark CRISTAL as a means of identifying the products at issue' (para. 36). 
Kot je navedel [Urad], hkratna uporaba teh elementov na isti buteljki ne pomeni kršitve funkcije identifikacije, ki jo ima znamka CRISTAL z vidika zadevnih proizvodov“ (točka 36).
‘Furthermore, [the Office's] finding that the use of the word mark together with the geographical indication “Champagne” cannot be considered to be an addition capable of altering the distinctive character of the trade mark when used for champagne must be endorsed. 
„Poleg tega je treba potrditi presojo [Urada], na podlagi katere uporabo besedne znamke skupaj z geografsko navedbo ,Champagne‘ ni mogoče šteti za dodatek, ki bi lahko spreminjal razlikovalni učinek znamke, ker se le-ta uporablja za šampanjec.
In the wine sector the consumer is often particularly interested in the precise geographical origin of the product and the identity of the wine producer, since the reputation of such products often depends on whether the wine is produced in a certain geographical region by a certain winery' (para. 37). 
Dejansko ima potrošnik na področju vina pogosto poseben interes v zvezi z natančnim geografskim izvorom proizvoda in identitete proizvajalca vina, ker je ugled teh proizvodov pogosto povezan z dejstvom, da jih določeno vinogradniško podjetje pridela na določenem geografskem področju“ (točka 37).
L.114 is a French trade mark registered for pharmaceutical products in Class 5. 
L.114 je francoska blagovna znamka, registrirana za farmacevtske proizvode iz razreda 5.
The Court found that: 1) the missing full-stop between the capital letter ‘L' and the number 114 constituted a minor difference that did not deprive earlier mark L.114 of its distinctive character (para. 53). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je: manjkajoča pika med veliko črko „L“ in številko 114 majhna razlika, ki prejšnji znamki L.114 ne odvzema razlikovalnega značaja (točka 53).
2) ‘Lehning' was the house mark. 
„Lehning“ je bila krovna znamka.
YGAY YGAY together with a number of other verbal and figurative elements 24/09/2008, R 1695/20071, I GAI (fig.) / YGAY et al.; confirmed 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai 
YGAY YGAY skupaj z več drugimi besednimi in figurativnimi elementi 24/09/2008, R 1695/20071, I GAI (fig.) / YGAY et al.; potrjena 21/09/2010, i Gai, T546/08
In the Board's decision (confirmed 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai, EU:T:2010:404, § 19, 20) it was pointed out that the trade mark YGAY appears in many photographs on both the label and the box in which the bottle is sold. 
V odločbi odbora za pritožbe (ki jo je Sodišče potrdilo v sodbi 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai, EU:T:2010:404, § 19, 20) je bilo poudarjeno, da se blagovna znamka YGAY pojavlja na številnih fotografijah na etiketi in škatli, v kateri se prodaja buteljka.
On the labels, the trade mark in question is separated from the other elements. 
Zadevna blagovna znamka je na etiketi ločena od drugih elementov.
On some labels, it appears on its own, beneath the phrase MARQUES DE MURRIETA, written in large bold letters. 
Na nekaterih etiketah se pojavlja sama pod izrazom MARQUES DE MURRIETA, napisanim z velikimi črkami v krepkem tisku.
On others, the phrase BODEGAS MARQUES DE MURRIETA is written in small letters in the upper part, while the elements CASTILLO YGAY are written in large, stylised letters across the label. 
Na drugih etiketah je izraz BODEGAS MARQUES DE MURRIETA napisan z malimi črkami na zgornjem delu etikete, elementa CASTILLO YGAY pa sta napisana z velikimi stiliziranimi črkami po celotni dolžini etikete.
The trade mark YGAY also appears on its own or together with the phrase CASTILLO YGAY on the boxes in which the bottles are sold. 
Blagovna znamka YGAY se sama ali skupaj z izrazom CASTILLO YGAY pojavlja tudi na škatlah, v katerih se prodajajo buteljke.
Levi Strauss is the proprietor of the two EUTMs reproduced above. 
Levi Strauss je imetnik dveh zgoraj prikazanih blagovnih znamk EU.
The Court found that the condition of ‘genuine use' may be fulfilled where an EU figurative mark is used only in conjunction with an EU word mark that is superimposed over it, and the combination of those two marks is, furthermore, itself registered as a European Union trade mark, to the extent that the differences between the form in which the trade mark is used and that in which it was registered do not change the distinctive character of the trade mark as registered. 
2. Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je pogoj resne in dejanske uporabe lahko izpolnjen, kadar se figurativna znamka EU uporablja le skupaj z besedno znamko EU, ki prekriva figurativno znamko, in je kot blagovna znamka registrirana kombinacija obeh znamk, če razlike med obliko, v kateri se blagovna znamka uporablja, in obliko, v kateri je bila registrirana, ne spremenijo razlikovalnega značaja blagovne znamke, kakor je bila registrirana.
Specsavers commenced proceedings for trade mark infringement and passing off on the basis of the earlier EUTM SPECSAVERS (word mark), as well as the figurative signs , and , against ASDA, a supermarket chain, which relaunched its optical business and targeted Specsavers in its marketing campaign. 
Družba Specsavers je sprožila postopek za kršitev blagovne znamke in zavajajoče označevanje na podlagi prejšnje blagovne znamke EU SPECSAVERS (besedna znamka) ter kršitev figurativnih znakov , in zoper družbo ASDA, verigo supermarketov, ki se je začela spet ukvarjati z optično dejavnostjo in je svojo oglaševalsko kampanjo usmerila zoper družbo Specsavers.
Specsavers used its black and white registrations in colour and acquired reputation in the UK for the colour green, using its sign as follows: . 
Družba Specsavers je svoje črno-bele registracije uporabljala v barvi in v Združenem kraljestvu pridobila ugled za zeleno barvo, pri čemer je uporabljala prikazani znak: .
ASDA also acquired reputation in the UK for another shade of green in its supermarket business and applied it to the optical business: . 
Tudi družba ASDA je v Združenem kraljestvu v okviru svoje dejavnosti supermarketov pridobila ugled za neki drug odtenek zelene barve, ki ga je uporabljala tudi v svoji optični dejavnosti: .
The Court found that the use of with the superimposed word sign may be considered genuine use of the wordless logo mark to the extent that the wordless logo mark as registered always refers in that form to the goods of the Specsavers group (to be determined by the referring court) (para. 24). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je uporabo znaka , ki ga prekriva besedni znak, mogoče šteti za resno in dejansko uporabo znamke z brezbesednim logotipom, če navedena znamka, kakor je bila registrirana, v tej obliki vedno napotuje na proizvode skupine Specsavers“ (kar mora presoditi predložitveno sodišče) (točka 24).
The Board of Appeal regarded the presentation of the two words as the use of two separate marks, since the evidence submitted by the opponent showed that one of them was an old brand of the opponent with its own identity and was present on the market with a number of accompanying signs, as is common practice in the labelling of the specific products (wine). 
Odbor za pritožbe je menil, da prikaz dveh besed pomeni uporabo dveh ločenih znamk, saj je bilo iz dokazov, ki jih je predložil vložnik ugovora, razvidno, da je bila ena od njih stara blagovna znamka vložnika ugovora s svojo identiteto in da je bila prisotna na trgu z več spremljevalnimi znaki, kar je običajna praksa pri označevanju posebnih proizvodov (vina).
‘“DUBOIS” and “MINUTO” are separate marks that are affixed together in the concrete product, as is common practice in the labelling of wine products (name of the winery and name of the product). 
„DUBOIS in MINUTO sta ločeni znamki, ki sta skupaj nameščeni na konkreten proizvod, kar je običajna praksa pri označevanju proizvodov vinskega sektorja (ime vinske kleti in ime proizvoda).
As regards Spanish brands, see for example “TORRES” - “Sangre de Toro”, “TORRES” - “Acqua d'Or”. 
V zvezi s španskimi znamkami glej na primer TORRES - Sangre de Toro in TORRES - Acqua d'Or.
When asking for “MINUTO” wine, the relevant consumer will be aware that such wine is included within the line of products “DUBOIS”, however, “MINUTO” will be perceived as a trade mark of its own, even if it may appear next to the sign ”DUBOIS” in the invoices, brochures and/or product labels' (para. 18). 
Kadar upoštevni potrošnik zahteva vino MINUTO, se zaveda, da je takšno vino del linije proizvodov DUBOIS, vendar se bo izraz MINUTO dojemal kot neodvisna blagovna znamka, tudi če se pojavi poleg znaka DUBOIS na računih, v brošurah in/ali na etiketah proizvodov“ (točka 18).
The General Court confirmed that the use of the mark Coloris with additional word elements such as ‘global coloring concept' or ‘gcc' did not alter its distinctive character because the additional elements were merely used together with the mark Coloris and positioned below it and were of such a size that they were not predominant in the mark. 
Splošno sodišče je potrdilo, da uporaba znamke Coloris z dodatnimi besednimi elementi, kot sta „global coloring concept ali „gcc, ni spremenila njenega razlikovalnega značaja, saj so se dodatni elementi uporabljali le skupaj z znamko Coloris in so bili nameščeni pod njo, njihova velikost pa je bila takšna, da v znamki niso bili prevladujoči.