natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the Office does not use those lists as a source of information about EU PDOs/PGIs; it uses the database cited above. 
Vendar Urad teh seznamov ne uporablja kot vir informacij o označbah ZOP/ZGO, registriranih v EU, temveč uporablja zgoraj navedeno podatkovno zbirko.
Firstly, the lists of EU PDOs/PGIs to be protected abroad may vary from one agreement to another, depending on the particularities of the negotiations. 
Prvič, seznami označb ZOP/ZGO, ki so registrirane v EU in bodo zaščitene v tujini, se lahko med sporazumi razlikujejo, kar je odvisno od posebnih značilnosti pogajanj.
Secondly, the annexes to the agreements are usually amended and updated through an ‘Exchange of Letters'. 
Drugič, priloge k sporazumom se običajno spreminjajo in posodabljajo z izmenjavo dopisov.
The geographical indication is protected under an international agreement signed only by Member States (i.e. the EU is not a party) 
Geografska označba je zaščitena v skladu z mednarodnim sporazumom, ki so ga podpisale le države članice (EU torej ni pogodbenica)
Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR applies to PDOs/PGIs protected by international agreements to which a Member State is a party. 
Člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se uporablja za ZOP/ZGO, ki so zaščitene z mednarodnimi sporazumi, katerih pogodbenica je država članica.
However, by analogy with the Office's interpretation of Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR as far as national law is concerned, the Office considers that the reference to ‘international agreements to which the … Member State concerned is party' should be interpreted as international agreements in those areas where no uniform EU protection is in place, namely non-agricultural products (see paragraph 5.1 above). 
Urad po analogiji s tem, kako razlaga člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU glede nacionalne zakonodaje, meni, da je treba sklicevanje na „mednarodne sporazume, katerih pogodbenica je zadevna država članica“ razlagati kot mednarodne sporazume na področjih, na katerih ni enotnega sistema zaščite EU, in sicer nekmetijski proizvodi (glej odstavek 5.1 zgoraj).
In its judgment of 08/09/2009, C478/07, Budĕjovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521, the Court discussed the exhaustive nature of EU law as regards PGIs originating from Member States. 
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 08/09/2009, C478/07, Budĕjovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521, EU:C:2009:521, razpravljalo o izčrpnosti prava EU v zvezi z ZGO, ki izvirajo iz držav članic.
In the Office's interpretation, this also applies to non-EU-country PDOs/PGIs in the relevant product fields that enjoy protection in the territory of a Member State through an international agreement concluded between that Member State and a non-EU-country. 
Na podlagi razlage Urada to velja tudi za označbe ZOP/ZGO države, ki ni članica EU, na ustreznih področjih proizvodov, ki so na ozemlju države članice zaščiteni na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, sklenjenega med navedeno državo članico in državo, ki ni članica EU.
This interpretation also applies to international agreements signed exclusively by Member States with non-EU countries (in particular, the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration). 
Ta razlaga se uporablja tudi za mednarodne sporazume, ki so jih podpisale izključno države članice s državami, ki niso članice EU (predvsem Lizbonski sporazum o zaščiti označb porekla in njihovi mednarodni registraciji).
For the sole purpose of the examination of absolute grounds for refusal, the EU is not a contracting party to these agreements, and they do not impose any obligations on the EU (14/10/1980, C812/79, Attorney General v Burgoa, EU:C:1980:231, § 9). 
EU izključno za preizkušanje absolutnih razlogov za zavrnitev ni pogodbenica teh sporazumov, ti pa EU tudi ne nalagajo nobenih obveznosti (14/10/1980, C812/79, Attorney General v Burgoa, EU:C:1980:231, § 9).
Therefore, Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR only applies to PDOs/PGIs for non-agricultural products protected under such agreements. 
Zato se člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uporablja samo za ZOP/ZGO za nekmetijske proizvode, ki so zaščitene na podlagi teh sporazumov.
In light of the foregoing, for the purposes of Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR, international agreements concluded by Member States are not applicable except: 
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se mednarodni sporazumi, ki jih sklenejo države članice, za namene člena 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne uporabljajo, razen:
to the extent that they cover PDOs/PGIs for non-agricultural products. 
če zajemajo ZOP/ZGO za nekmetijske proizvode.
Currently, neither the Commission nor the Office keeps a database listing the PDOs/PGIs for non-agricultural products protected under international agreements concluded by Member States. 
Trenutno niti Komisija niti Urad ne vodita podatkovne zbirke, ki bi vsebovala seznam ZOP/ZGO za nekmetijske proizvode, zaščitenih na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov, ki so jih sklenile države članice,
in the case of international agreements concluded with non-EU countries by a Member State before its accession to the EU. 
v primeru mednarodnih sporazumov, ki jih država članica sklene z državami, ki niso članice EU, pred datumom svojega pristopa k EU.
This is because the obligations arising out of an international agreement entered into by a Member State before its accession to the EU have to be respected. 
To pa zato, ker je treba spoštovati obveznosti iz mednarodnega sporazuma, ki ga je država članica sklenila pred svojim pristopom k EU.
However, Member States are required to take all appropriate steps to eliminate the incompatibilities between an agreement concluded before a Member State's accession and the Treaty (see Article 307, Treaty Establishing the European Community, now Article 351 TFEU, as interpreted by the Court in its judgment of 18/11/2003, C216/01, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2003:618, § 168-172). 
Vendar morajo države članice izvesti vse potrebne ukrepe za odpravo neskladnosti med sporazumom, sklenjenim pred pristopom države članice, in Pogodbo (glej člen 307 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zdaj člen 351 PDEU, kot ga Sodišče razlaga v svoji sodbi 18/11/2003, C216/01, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2003:618, § 168-172),
in the case of international agreements concluded with a non-EU country by a Member State after its accession to the EU, but before the entry into force of the uniform EU system of protection in the given product area. 
v primeru mednarodnih sporazumov, ki jih država članica sklene z državo, ki ni članica EU, po svojem pristopu k EU, vendar pred začetkom veljavnosti enotnega sistema varstva EU za določeno področje proizvoda.
5.3 Relationship with other EUTMR provisions 
Povezava z drugimi določbami Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
When the mark can be objected to under Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR, further examination may still be necessary under the remaining possible grounds for refusal, such as Article 7(1)(k) or 7(1)(l) EUTMR. 
Kadar se zoper znamko lahko vloži ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, je morda še vedno potrebno nadaljnje preizkušanje glede preostalih možnih razlogov za zavrnitev, kot je člen 7(1)(k) ali (l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
In other words, an EUTM application may be in conflict with both a PDO/PGI in the wine sector and a protected traditional term for wines or with a PDO/PGI in the agricultural and foodstuffs sector and a protected traditional speciality guaranteed. 
Z drugimi besedami, prijava blagovne znamke EU lahko sovpada z ZOP/ZGO v vinskem sektorju in zaščitenim tradicionalnim izrazom za vina ali ZOP/ZGO v sektorju kmetijskih proizvodov in živil in zaščiteno zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnostjo.
PDO/PGI European Union trade mark 
ZOP/ZGO Blagovna znamka Evropske unije
The genitive case denotes, inter alia, origin and possession and in this case evokes the PDO. 
Rodilnik med drugim označuje poreklo in svojino ter v tem primeru navaja ZOP.
The figurative element is a visual repetition of the term as it consists of a typical representation of the ancient Greek god Asclepios. 
Figurativni element je vidna ponovitev izraza, saj je značilna upodobitev starogrškega boga Asklepija.
PDO/PGI Trade Mark Explanation 
ZOP/ZGO Blagovna znamka Pojasnilo
The presence of a partial correlation in the present case between the terms ‘VERDI' on the one hand, and ‘VERDE' on the other, is not sufficient to offset the fact that the consumer of the goods in question will perceive the sign ‘VERDI' as a clear reference to the Italian opera composer. 
Prisotnost delne povezave med izrazoma „VERDI“ na eni strani in „VERDE“ na drugi strani v tem primeru ne zadostuje za ugotovitev, da bo potrošnik zadevnega blaga znak „VERDI“ zaznal kot jasno sklicevanje na italijanskega opernega skladatelja.
Therefore, it is unlikely that it will be perceived as evoking a PGI relating to wine. 
Zato ni verjetno, da bo zaznana kot navajanje ZGO, ki se nanaša na vino.
Moreover, ‘Cape' by itself is not, on its own, the significant part of the PGI. 
Poleg tega izraz „Cape“ sam po sebi ni velik del ZGO.
PDO/PGI European Union trade mark (invented examples) Explanation 
ZOP/ZGO Blagovna znamka Evropske unije (izmišljeni primeri) Pojasnilo
IBIZA IBICENCO Noun in the PGI → Adjective in the EUTM 
IBIZA IBICENCO Samostalnik v ZGO → Pridevnik v blagovni znamki EU
AÇORES AÇORIANO Noun in the PGI → Adjective in the EUTM 
AÇORES AÇORIANO Samostalnik v ZGO → Pridevnik v blagovni znamki EU
BORDEAUX BORDELAIS Noun in the PDO → Adjective in the EUTM 
BORDEAUX BORDELAIS Samostalnik v ZOP → Pridevnik v blagovni znamki EU
JAGNIĘCINA PODHALAŃSKA JAGNIĘCINA Z PODHALA Adjective in the PGI → Noun in the EUTM 
JAGNIĘCINA PODHALAŃSKA JAGNIĘCINA Z PODHALA Pridevnik v ZGO → Samostalnik v blagovni znamki EU
MEL DO ALENTEJO MEL ALENTEJANA Noun in the PDO → Adjective in the EUTM 
MEL DO ALENTEJO MEL ALENTEJANA Samostalnik v ZOP → Pridevnik v blagovni znamki EU
SCOTTISH WILD SALMON WILD SALMON FROM SCOTLAND Adjective in the PGI → Noun in the EUTM 
SCOTTISH WILD SALMON WILD SALMON FROM SCOTLAND Pridevnik v ZGO → Samostalnik v blagovni znamki EU
The inclusion of the term ‘NATURA' in the sign applied for does not prevent the existence of an ‘inclusion' and ‘evocation' of the geographical indication ‘EMILIA'. 
Vključitev izraza „NATURA“ v znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, ne preprečuje obstoja vključitve in navajanja geografske označbe „EMILIA“.
On the contrary, this element, interpreted to mean ‘essence' or ‘nature', reinforces the concept conveyed by the adjective ‘EMILIANA', which is the most distinctive element of the sign applied for. 
Nasprotno, ta element, ki se razlaga kot „bistvo“ ali „narava“, krepi koncept pridevnika „EMILIANA“, ki je najbolj razlikovalen element znaka, za katerega je vložena prijava.
PDO/PGI European Union trade mark Explanation 
ZOP/ZGO Blagovna znamka Evropske unije Pojasnilo
COGNAC KONJAKKI (invented example) An EUTM that contains the term ‘Konjakki' will be considered to evoke ‘Cognac' in Finnish. 
COGNAC KONJAKKI (izmišljen primer) V zvezi z blagovno znamko EU, ki vsebuje izraz „Konjakki“, se bo štelo, da prikazuje izraz „Cognac“ v finščini.
PÂTES D'ALSACE ALSATIAN PASTA (invented example) An EUTM that contains the expression ‘Alsatian Pasta' will be considered to evoke the PGI ‘Pâtes d'Alsace'. 
PÂTES D'ALSACE ALSATIAN PASTA (izmišljen primer) Šteje se, da blagovna znamka EU, ki vsebuje izraz „Alsatian Pasta“, navaja ZGO „Pâtes d'Alsace“.
RIOJA (PDO-ES-A0117) RIOJA STYLE RED WINE An EUTM that contains an expression such as ‘Rioja Style Red Wine' will be considered to evoke the PDO ‘Rioja' even if it conveys the idea that the product in question is not a ‘genuine' PDO Rioja wine. 
RIOJA (PDO-ES-A0117) RIOJA STYLE RED WINE V zvezi z blagovno znamko EU, ki vsebuje izraz, kot je „Rioja Style Red Wine“, se bo štelo, da prikazuje ZOP „Rioja“ tudi, če vzbuja predstavo, da zadevni proizvod ni „pristno“ vino ZOP Rioja.
FETA GREEK STYLE PLAIN FETA ARABIAN FETA An EUTM that contains expressions such as ‘Greek Style Plain Feta' or ‘Arabian Feta', will be considered to evoke the PDO ‘Feta', even if it conveys the idea that the product in question is not a ‘genuine PDO Feta' cheese. 
FETA GREEK STYLE PLAIN FETA ARABIAN FETA V zvezi z blagovno znamko EU, ki vsebuje izraze, kot sta „Greek Style Plain Feta“ ali „Arabian Feta“, se bo štelo, da navaja ZOP „Feta“ tudi, če vzbuja predstavo, da zadevni proizvod ni „pristen sir ZOP Feta“.
PDO/PGI European Union trade mark (invented example) Explanation 
ZOP/ZGO Blagovna znamka Evropske unije (izmišljen primer) Pojasnilo
RIOJA (PDO-ES-A0117) RIOJA WINE UKRAINE The EUTM refers to a Spanish PDO. 
RIOJA (PDO-ES-A0117) RIOJA WINE UKRAJINA Blagovna znamka EU se nanaša na špansko ZOP.
It also refers to Ukraine. 
Nanaša se tudi na Ukrajino.
The trade mark misuses the term RIOJA for wines from Ukraine. 
Blagovna znamka zlorablja izraz RIOJA za vina iz Ukrajine.
PORTO (PDO-PT-A1540) EUTM depicting the ‘Dom Luís I Bridge' in the city of Porto A picture of the Dom Luís I Bridge and its riverside is a well-known emblem of the city of Porto. 
PORTO (PDO-PT-A1540) Blagovna znamka EU, ki upodablja most Dom Luís I v Portu Slika mostu Dom Luís I in njegovega rečnega brega je znan simbol Porta.
PDO/PGI CASTELLÓ (PGI) for wines 
ZOP/ZGO CASTELLÓ (ZGO) za vina
European Union trade mark CASTELL DE LA BLEDA for wines EUTM No 14 202 808 
Blagovna znamka Evropske unije CASTELL DE LA BLEDA za vina Blagovna znamka EU št.
It is considered that the term ‘CASTELL' does not constitute, strictly speaking, an evocation of the PGI in question. 
Šteje se, da izraz „CASTELL“ strogo gledano ne pomeni prikazovanja zadevne ZGO.
While it is admitted that the difference is only in one letter, terms such as ‘castillo/castello', ‘torre', etc. are commonly used in the presentation of wines. 
Čeprav se upošteva, da se razlikuje samo ena črka, se izrazi, kot sta „castillo/castello“, „torre“ itd., običajno uporabljajo pri predstavitvi vin.
In view of this, it is unlikely that the relevant consumers would associate the EUTM in question with the wines protected under the PGI. 
Glede na to ni verjetno, da bi upoštevni potrošniki zadevno blagovno znamko EU povezali z vini, zaščitenimi z ZGO.
It is rather more likely that they will first make an immediate association with a common term in the marketing of wines. 
Verjetneje je, da jo bodo najprej povezali z običajnim izrazom v trženju vin.
PDO/PGI ALBA (PDO) for wines 
ZOP/ZGO ALBA (ZOP) za vina
European Union trade mark EUTM No 14 955 736 for wines 
Blagovna znamka Evropske unije Blagovna znamka EU št.
PGI European Union trade mark Explanation 
ZGO Blagovna znamka Evropske unije Pojasnilo
Vodka of Finland FINNISH TASTE (fig.) applied for alcoholic beverages (invented example) The EUTM is acceptable for vodka complying with the specifications of the PGI vodka of Finland; vodka-based beverages complying with the specifications of the PGI ‘Vodka of Finland' and for any other specific alcoholic beverages, for instance: vodka complying with the specifications of the PGI ‘Vodka of Finland'; beverages based on or containing vodka complying with the specification ‘Vodka of Finland'; whisky. alcoholic beverages except vodka and beverages based on or containing vodka. 
Vodka of Finland FINNISH TASTE (fig.) vložena prijava za alkoholne pijače (izmišljen primer) Blagovna znamka EU je sprejemljiva za vodko, ki je skladna s specifikacijami označbe ZGO „Vodka of Finland“; pijače na osnovi vodke, ki so skladne s specifikacijami označbe ZGO „Vodka of Finland“, in za vse druge specifične alkoholne pijače, na primer: vodka, ki je skladna s specifikacijami ZGO „Vodka of Finland“; pijače na osnovi vodke ali ki vsebujejo vodko in so skladne s specifikacijo „Vodka of Finland“; viski; alkoholne pijače razen vodke in pijač na osnovi vodke ali ki vsebujejo vodko.
The following limitation is, however, not acceptable: vodka complying with the specifications of the PGI ‘Vodka of Finland'; other alcoholic beverages. 
Naslednja omejitev pa ni sprejemljiva: vodka, ki je skladna s specifikacijami označbe ZGO „Vodka of Finland“; druge alkoholne pijače.
The reference to ‘other alcoholic beverages' would include vodkathat does not comply with the PGI specifications. 
Sklicevanje na izraz druge alkoholne pijače bi vključevalo vodko, ki ni skladna s specifikacijami označbe ZGO.
Therefore, the addition of the reference to ‘Portugal' will not trigger the image of the PGI ‘anis português' and/or PGI ‘ginjinha portuguesa' in the mind of the relevant public when encountering the trade mark. 
Zato dodatek sklicevanja na Portugalsko ne bo povzročil, da upoštevna javnost ob blagovni znamki pomisli na označbo ZGO „anis português“ in/ali označbo ZGO „ginjinha portuguesa“.
PDO/PGI RIOJA (PDO-ES-A0117) SANTIAGO (Chilean PGI) for wines 
ZOP/ZGO RIOJA (PDO-ES-A0117) SANTIAGO (čilska ZGO) za vina
European Union trade mark RIOJA SANTIAGO for wines 
Blagovna znamka Evropske unije RIOJA SANTIAGO za vina
Explanation The trade mark applied for consists of the terms ‘RIOJA' and ‘SANTIAGO', each of which coincides with a PDO for wines, the former (RIOJA) being protected by the European Union and the latter (SANTIAGO), a geographical indication for a wine originating from Chile, protected under a bilateral agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile. 
Pojasnilo Znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, je sestavljena iz izrazov „RIOJA“ in „SANTIAGO“, pri čemer oba sovpadata z ZOP za vino, prvega (RIOJA) je zaščitila Evropska unija, drugi (SANTIAGO), geografska označba za vino iz Čila, pa je zaščiten na podlagi dvostranskega sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Republiko Čile.
It is not possible to accept any limitation that includes wine originating from the territory of one of the two designations of origin since such a limitation automatically excludes wines originating from the other designation of origin, which inevitably means that the trade mark applied for will lead to confusion. 
Ni mogoče sprejeti nobene omejitve, ki vključuje vino, ki izvira iz ozemlja ene od dveh označb porekla, saj takšna omejitev samodejno izključuje vina, ki izvirajo iz druge označbe porekla, kar nujno pomeni, da bo znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, povzročila zmedo.
By the same token, a hypothetical limitation of the list of goods to wine from the geographical area covered by either of the designations of origin, e.g. ‘wines from the Rioja designation of origin and wines from the Santiago designation of origin', in Class 33, would be covered by the prohibition of Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR insofar as the trade mark would inevitably - and confusingly - identify wines with a geographical origin other than that of the respective designations of origin included under the trade mark. 
Iz istega razloga bi za hipotetično omejitev seznama blaga na vina iz geografskega območja, ki ga zajema katera koli od označb porekla, na primer vina označbe porekla Rioja in vina označbe porekla Santiago iz razreda 33, veljala prepoved iz člena 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, saj bi znamka nujno - in na način, ki povzroča zmedo - opredelila vina z geografskim poreklom, ki se razlikuje od geografskega porekla zadevnih označb porekla, zajetih z znamko.
Preventing such an eventuality is the principal purpose of that article. 
Glavni namen navedenega člena je preprečiti takšno situacijo.
PDO/PGI PAUILLAC (PDO-FR-A0713) BORDEAUX (PDO-FR-A0821) for wines 
ZOP/ZGO PAUILLAC (PDO-FR-A0713) BORDEAUX (PDO-FR-A0821) za vina
European Union trade mark PAUILLAC BORDEAUX for wines 
Blagovna znamka Evropske unije PAUILLAC BORDEAUX za vina
Explanation A limitation is not possible, as a limitation of one or the other would be deceptive. 
Pojasnilo Omejitev ni mogoča, saj bi bila omejitev enega ali drugega zavajajoča.
The quality and characteristics of the PDO are not the same and the consumers would be misled as to the geographical origin of the product. 
Kakovost in značilnosti označbe ZOP niso enake, potrošnike pa bi bili zavedeni glede geografskega porekla proizvoda.
This applies, notwithstanding that Pauillac is geographically located within the Bordeaux region. 
To se uporablja ne glede na to, da je Pauillac geografsko v regiji Bordeaux.
PDO/PGI TORO (PDO-ES-A0886) QUESO ZAMORANO (ES/PDO/0017/0089) 
ZOP/ZGO TORO (PDO-ES-A0886) QUESO ZAMORANO (ES/PDO/0017/0089)
European Union trade mark TORO ZAMORANO for wines and cheese 
Blagovna znamka Evropske unije TORO ZAMORANO za vina in sir
Explanation Toro is a region within the province of Zamora. 
Pojasnilo Toro je regija v provinci Zamora.
The sign reproduces in its integrity the PDO Toro and evokes the PDO ‘Queso Zamorano'. 
Znak kot celota reproducira ZOP Toro in navaja ZOP „Queso Zamorano“.
A limitation should be introduced for both wines complying with the PDO Toro and cheese complying with the PDO ‘Queso Zamorano'. 
Uveljaviti bi bilo treba omejitev za vina, ki so v skladu z ZOP Toro, in sir, ki je v skladu z ZOP „Queso Zamorano“.
PDO/PGI ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA (PGI) ACETO BALSAMICO TRADIZIONALE DI MODENA (PDO) both for vinegar 
ZOP/ZGO ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA (ZGO) ACETO BALSAMICO TRADIZIONALE DI MODENA (ZOP) obe za kis
European Union trade mark MARIOLA ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA (invented) for vinegar 
Blagovna znamka Evropske unije MARIOLA ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA (izmišljeno) za kis
Comment The sign reproduces in its integrity the PGI aceto balsámico di Modena. 
Pripomba Znak kot celota reproducira ZGO „aceto balsámico di Modena“.
A limitation should be introduced for vinegars complying with the specifications of the PGI ‘ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA'. 
Uveljaviti bi bilo treba omejitev za kis v skladu s specifikacijami ZGO „ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA“.
The public will not be deceived as to the geographical origin of the products. 
Javnost ni zavedena glede geografskega porekla proizvoda.
However, a limitation for aceto balsámico tradizionale di Modena should not be accepted as the sign expressly refers to the PGI and not to the PDO. 
Omejitve za aceto balsámico tradizionale di Modena se ne sme sprejeti, saj se znak izrecno nanaša na ZGO, in ne na ZOP.
PGI ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA (PGI) ACETO BALSAMICO TRADIZIONALE DI MODENA (PDO) both for vinegar 
ZGO ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA (ZGO) ACETO BALSAMICO TRADIZIONALE DI MODENA (ZOP) obe za kis
European Union trade mark MARIOLA MODENA (invented) for vinegar 
Blagovna znamka Evropske unije MARIOLA MODENA (izmišljeno) za kis
Comment A limitation should be introduced either for the PGI ‘aceto balsámico di Modena' or for the PDO ‘aceto balsámico tradizionale di Modena' or for both. 
Pripomba Uvesti je treba omejitev za ZGO „aceto balsámico di Modena“ ali za ZOP „aceto balsámico tradizionale di Modena“ ali obe.
PDO/PGI Alpes-de-Haute-Provence (PGI) Coteaux d'Aix-en-Provence (PDO) Coteaux Varois en Provence (PDO) Côtes de Provence (PDO) Les Baux de Provence (PDO) all for wines 
ZOP/ZGO Alpes-de-Haute-Provence (ZGO) Coteaux d'Aix-en-Provence (ZOP) Coteaux Varois en Provence (ZOP) Côtes de Provence (ZOP) Les Baux de Provence (ZOP) vse za vina
European Union trade mark CHATEAU LEBEL PONT EN PROVENCE for wines 
Blagovna znamka Evropske unije CHATEAU LEBEL PONT EN PROVENCE za vina
Comment A limitation should be introduced with respect to one, some, or all of the PGIs/PDOs. e.g. wines complying with the specifications of the PGI ‘Alpes-de-Haute-Provence'; wines complying with the specifications of the PDO ‘Coteaux d'Aix-en-Provence'; wines complying with the specifications of the PDO ‘Coteaux Varois en Provence'; wines complying with the specifications of the PDO ‘Côtes de Provence'; wines complying with the specifications of the PDO ‘Les Baux de Provence'. 
Pripomba Uveljaviti bi bilo treba omejitev glede ene, nekaterih ali vseh ZGO/ZOP. npr. vina v skladu s specifikacijami ZGO „Alpes-de-Haute-Provence“; vina v skladu s specifikacijami ZOP „Coteaux d'Aix-en-Provence“; vina v skladu s specifikacijami ZOP „Coteaux Varois en Provence“; vina v skladu s specifikacijami ZOP „Côtes de Provence“; vina v skladu s specifikacijami ZOP „Les Baux de Provence“.
This EUTM application is different from the EUTM application Pauillac Bordeaux, where the EUTM application expressly refers to two PGIs/PDOs. 
Prijava blagovne znamke EU je drugačna od prijave blagovne znamke EU Pauillac Bordeaux, ki se izrecno nanaša na dve ZGO/ZOP.