natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, there are some geographical terms, such as major geographical places or regions as well as countries, which may be refused merely because of their widespread recognition and fame for the high quality of their goods or services. 
Nekateri geografski izrazi, kot so večja geografska območja ali regije in tudi države, ki se lahko zavrnejo le zaradi njihove splošne prepoznavnosti in slovesa zaradi visoke kakovosti blaga ali storitev.
In such cases no detailed assessment of the association between the place and the goods and services is necessary (15/12/2011, T377/09, Passionately Swiss, EU:T:2011:753, § 43-45). 
V teh primerih ni potrebna natančna presoja povezave med krajem in blagom ter storitvami (15/12/2011, T377/09, Passionately Swiss, EU:T:2011:753, § 43-45).
The mere fact that a geographical term is used by only one producer is not sufficient to overcome an objection, although it is an important argument to be taken into account in assessing acquired distinctiveness. 
Dejstvo, da geografski izraz uporablja le en proizvajalec, ne zadostuje za odpravo ugovora, čeprav je to pomembna utemeljitev, ki jo je treba upoštevati pri presoji pridobljenega razlikovalnega učinka.
2.7 Terms describing subject matter in goods or services 
Izrazi, ki opisujejo predmet blaga ali storitev
Where a sign consists exclusively of a word that describes what may be the subject matter or content of the goods or services in question, it should be objected to under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR. 
Če znak vsebuje samo besedo, ki opisuje, kaj je lahko predmet ali vsebina zadevnega blaga ali storitev, je zanj treba vložiti ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Commonly known terms likely to be linked to a particular thing, product or activity by the relevant public are capable of describing subject matter and should therefore be kept free for other traders (12/06/2007, T339/05, Lokthread, EU:T:2007:172, § 27). 
Splošno znani izrazi, ki jih bo upoštevna javnost verjetno povezala z določenim predmetom, proizvodom ali dejavnostjo, lahko opisujejo predmet in jih je zato treba ohraniti proste za druge trgovce (12/06/2007, T339/05, Lokthread, EU:T:2007:172, § 27).
The essential question is whether the sign applied for may be used in trade in relation to the goods or services applied for in a manner that will be undoubtedly perceived by the relevant public as descriptive of the subject matter of those goods or services for which protection is sought, and should therefore be kept free for other traders. 
Bistveno vprašanje je, ali se lahko znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, uporablja v trgovini v povezavi z zadevnim blagom ali storitvami na način, ki ga bo upoštevna javnost nedvomno zaznala, kot da ima opisni pomen za predmet zadevnega blaga ali storitev, za katere se zahteva varstvo, in ga je zato treba ohraniti prostega za druge trgovce.
For example, a widely known name such as ‘Vivaldi' will immediately create a link to the famous composer, just as the term ‘skis' will immediately create a link to the sport of skiing. 
Na primer, pri splošno znanem imenu, kot je „Vivaldi“, se bo takoj ustvarila povezava s slavnim skladateljem, pri izrazu „smuči“ pa se bo takoj ustvarila povezava s smučanjem.
While Class 16 (books) is a prime example of a category of goods that contains subject matter or content, an objection made under this section may occur also with respect to other goods and services, such as recorded DVDs or editorial services. 
Razred 16 (knjige) je značilen primer kategorije blaga, ki vsebuje predmet ali vsebino, ugovor v okviru tega razdelka pa se lahko vloži tudi v zvezi z drugim blagom in storitvami, kot so posnete DVD-plošče ali založniške storitve.
With regard to this section, the terms ‘subject matter' and ‘content' are used interchangeably. 
V zvezi s tem razdelkom sta izraza „predmet“ in „vsebina“ medsebojno zamenljiva.
See also the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 3, Non-Distinctive Trade Marks (Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR), paragraph 3. 
Glej tudi Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavje 3: Nerazlikovalne blagovne znamke (člen 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), odstavek 3.
Names of famous persons (in particular musicians or composers) can indicate the category of goods, if due to widespread use, time lapse, date of death, popularisation, recognition, multiple performers or musical training, the public can understand them as generic. 
Imena slavnih oseb (zlasti glasbenikov ali skladateljev) lahko označujejo kategorijo blaga, če jih lahko javnost zaradi razširjene uporabe, časovne oddaljenosti, datuma smrti, popularizacije, priznanja, različnih interpretacij ali glasbene izobrazbe razume kot splošna.
This would be the case, for example, with respect to ‘Vivaldi', whose music is played by orchestras all over the world and the sign ‘Vivaldi' will not be understood as an indicator of origin for music. 
Takšen primer je „Vivaldi“, čigar glasbo izvajajo orkestri po vsem svetu, zato se znak „Vivaldi“ ne bo razumel kot označba izvora za glasbo.
In the event of services, where a sign consists of a term indicating a certain industry, such as ‘CLOTHING' or ‘CARS', and it can be reasonably assumed that a services provider (e.g. in the field of advertising or retail services) could specialise to meet the characteristics of that particular industry, an objection to subject matter should be raised. 
V primeru storitev je treba, če znak sestavlja izraz, ki navaja določeno industrijo, kot je „OBLAČILA“ ali „AVTOMOBILI“, in se lahko razumno domneva, da bi se lahko ponudnik storitev (npr. na področju oglaševanja ali maloprodajnih storitev) specializiral, da bi bil skladen z značilnostmi zadevne industrije, vložiti ugovor zoper predmet.
Objections based on the above: 
Ugovori na podlagi zgoraj navedenega:
will apply only to goods (e.g. books) or services (e.g. education) that contain subject matter regarding other things, products and/or activities (e.g. a book about history, or an educational course on history); 
bodo veljali samo za blago (npr. knjige) ali storitve (npr. izobraževanje), ki vsebujejo predmet, povezan z drugimi stvarmi, proizvodi in/ali dejavnostmi (npr. knjiga o zgodovini ali izobraževalni program o zgodovini),
when the sign consists exclusively of the word identifying that subject matter (e.g. ‘VEHICLES' or ‘HISTORY'); and 
se bodo vložili, kadar znak vsebuje samo besedo, ki označuje ta predmet (npr.
Goods and services that may contain subject matter 
Blago in storitve, ki lahko vsebujejo predmet
For most cases, the goods or services that may consist of or contain subject matter that give rise to an objection are the following. 
V večini primerov blago ali storitve, ki lahko vsebujejo predmet, ki privede do ugovora, ali so iz njega sestavljene, vključujejo naslednje:
Class 9: software, electronic publications (downloadable). 
Razred 9: programska oprema, elektronske publikacije (prenosljive)
○ Give rise to an objection 
Privedejo do ugovora
- STATISTICAL ANALYSIS for software 
- STATISTIČNA ANALIZA za programsko opremo
- ROCK MUSIC for pre-recorded CDs. 
- ROCK GLASBA predposnete CD-plošče
Class 16: Printed matter, photographs and teaching materials as long as these include printed matter. 
Razred 16: Tiskovine, fotografije in učno gradivo, če vključujejo tiskovine
○ Give rise to an objection 
Privedejo do ugovora.
- HISTORY for books 
- ZGODOVINA za knjige
- PARIS for travel guides 
- PARIZ za potovalne vodnike
- CAR for magazines 
- AVTOMOBIL za revije
- ANIMALS for photographs 
- ŽIVALI za fotografije
- TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION for instructional and teaching material. 
- TRANSCENDENTALNA MEDITACIJA za material za učenje ali poučevanje
Class 28: Board games 
Razred 28: Igre na ploščah
Give rise to an objection 
Privedejo do ugovora
Class 35: Trade fairs, advertising, retail services, import-export services. 
Razred 35: Trgovski sejmi, oglaševanje in oglaševalske storitve, storitve maloprodaje
- ELECTRONICA for trade fairs related to electronic goods (05/12/2000, T32/00, Electronica, EU:T:2000:283, § 42-44) 
- ELECTRONICA za trgovske sejme v zvezi z elektronskimi proizvodi (05/12/2000, T32/00, Electronica, EU:T:2000:283, § 42-44)
- LIVE CONCERT for advertising services 
- KONCERT V ŽIVO za oglaševalske storitve
- CLOTHING for retail services 
- OBLAČILA za storitve maloprodaje
- PHARMACEUTICALS for import-export services. 
- FARMACEVTSKI PROIZVODI za uvozne in izvozne storitve
Class 41: Education, training, entertainment, electronic publications (non-downloadable). 
Razred 41: Izobraževanje, usposabljanje, razvedrilo, nenaložljive elektronske publikacije
- GERMAN for language courses 
- NEMŠČINA za jezikovne tečaje
- HISTORY for education 
- ZGODOVINA za izobraževanje
- COMEDY for television programmes 
- KOMEDIJA za televizijske programe
- TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION for education services. 
- TRANSCENDENTALNA MEDITACIJA za storitve izobraževanja
The above list of Nice classes is not exhaustive, although it will apply to the vast majority of cases. 
Zgornji seznam razredov Nicejske klasifikacije ni izčrpen, čeprav bo veljal za veliko večino primerov.
Consequently, objections based on descriptive subject matter should be raised primarily in the context of the goods and services listed above. 
Ugovore, ki temeljijo na opisnem predmetu, je zato treba vložiti predvsem v povezavi z zgoraj navedenim blagom in storitvami.
Where the sign applied for is a descriptive term for a particular characteristic of goods or services, a designation of goods or services that excludes that particular characteristic described by the sign applied for will not avoid an objection based on subject matter. 
Če je znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, opisni izraz za določeno lastnost blaga ali storitev, se oznaka blaga ali storitev, ki izključuje to lastnost, ki jo opisuje znak, ne bo izognila ugovoru na podlagi predmeta.
This is because it is unacceptable for an applicant to make a claim of goods or services subject to the condition that they do not possess a particular characteristic (12/02/2004, C363/99, Postkantoor, EU:C:2004:86, § 114116). 
Nesprejemljivo je namreč, da prijavitelj vloži zahtevo za blago ali storitve, če nimajo določene lastnosti (12/02/2004, C363/99, Postkantoor, EU:C:2004:86, § 114116).
The following invented examples illustrate designations of goods or services that will not avoid an objection: 
Naslednji izmišljeni primeri kažejo oznake blaga ali storitev, ki se ne bodo izognile ugovoru:
COMEDY for television broadcasting, except for comedy programming 
KOMEDIJA za televizijsko oddajanje, razen za programe s humorističnimi serijami,
PENGUINS (in plural!) for books, except for books about penguins 
PINGVINI (v množini) za knjige, razen za knjige o pingvinih,
TECHNOLOGY for classes, except for classes about computers and technology. 
TEHNOLOGIJA za poučevanje, razen za poučevanje o računalnikih in tehnologiji.
Distinguishable from the examples above are positive claims of goods or services, under which it is impossible for the sign applied for to describe any subject matter or content. 
Med zgornjimi primeri je treba prepoznati pozitivne zahteve za blago ali storitve, v skladu s katerimi znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, ne more opisovati nobenega predmeta ali vsebine.
For example, the following invented examples would not be liable to objection, at least with regard to signs being descriptive of subject matter: 
Na primer, naslednji izmišljeni primeri ne bi bili sporni, vsaj glede znakov, ki opisujejo predmet:
COMEDY for television broadcasting of economic news, politics and technology 
KOMEDIJA za televizijsko oddajanje o gospodarskih novicah, politiki in tehnologiji,
PENGUIN for comic books with country western, medieval and ancient Roman themes 
PINGVIN za stripe o divjem zahodu, srednjem veku in antičnem Rimu,
TECHNOLOGY for classes about creative fiction writing. 
TEHNOLOGIJA za poučevanje o ustvarjalnem pisanju leposlovne literature.
2.8 Single letters and numerals 
Posamezne črke in številke
Single letters 
Posamezne črke
[2: This part deals with single letters under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR. 
[2: Ta del obravnava posamezne črke na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
For single letters under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 3, Non-Distinctive Trade Marks (Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR), paragraph 5.] 
Za posamezne črke na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavje 3: Nerazlikovalne blagovne znamke (člen 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), odstavek 5.]
General considerations 
Splošne ugotovitve
In its judgment of 09/09/2010, C265/09 P, α, EU:C:2010:508, the Court stated that when examining absolute grounds for refusal, the Office is required, under Article 95(1) EUTMR, to examine, of its own motion, the relevant facts that might lead it to raise an objection under Article 7(1) EUTMR and that that requirement cannot be made relative or reversed, to the detriment of the EUTM applicant (paras 55-58). 
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 09/09/2010, C265/09 P, α, EU:C:2010:508, navedlo, da Urad na podlagi člena 95(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v postopku registracije v zvezi z absolutnimi razlogi za zavrnitev preveri upoštevna dejstva po uradni dolžnosti, na podlagi česar lahko vloži ugovor v skladu s členom 7(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, in da ta zahteva ne bi smela biti ne relativizirana ne v škodo prijavitelja (točke od 55 do 58).
Therefore, it is for the Office to explain, with motivated reasoning, why a trade mark consisting of a single letter represented in standard characters is descriptive. 
Zato mora Urad z utemeljeno obrazložitvijo pojasniti, zakaj je blagovna znamka, sestavljena iz ene same črke v standardni pisavi, opisna.
Consequently, when examining single letter trade marks, generic, unsubstantiated arguments such as those relating to the availability of signs, given the limited number of letters, should be avoided. 
Zato se je treba pri preizkušanju blagovnih znamk, sestavljenih iz ene same črke, zaradi omejenega števila črk izogibati splošnim, neutemeljenim argumentom, kot je razpoložljivost znakov.
Similarly, it would not be appropriate to base an objection on speculative reasoning as to the different meanings that a sign could possibly have. 
Podobno ne bi bilo primerno ugovor utemeljiti s hipotetično obrazložitvijo različnih pomenov, ki bi jih lahko imel znak.
The Office is obliged to establish, on the basis of a factual assessment, why the trade mark applied for would be liable to objection. 
Urad mora na podlagi presoje dejstev ugotoviti, zakaj bi bila blagovna znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, sporna.
It is therefore clear that the examination of single letter trade marks should be thorough and stringent, and that each case calls for a careful examination. 
Jasno je torej, da je treba blagovne znamke, sestavljene iz ene same črke, temeljito in strogo preizkusiti ter v vsakem primeru opraviti natančen preizkus.
For instance, in technical domains such as those involving computers, machines, motors and tools, it may be that particular letters have a descriptive connotation if they convey sufficiently precise information about the goods and/or services concerned. 
Na tehničnih področjih, ki vključujejo na primer računalnike, stroje, motorje in orodja, je mogoče, da imajo določene črke opisni pomen, če izražajo dovolj natančne informacije o zadevnem blagu in/ali storitvah.
The letter ‘E' was also considered to be descriptive in respect of wind power plants and parts thereof, generators, rotor blades for wind power plants, rotors for wind power plants in Class 7, control switches for wind power plants, frequency converters, measuring, signalling and checking (supervision) instruments, apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity in Class 9 and towers for wind power plants in Class 19, since it may be seen as a reference to energy or electricity (21/05/2008, T329/06, E, EU:T:2008:161, § 24-31; 08/09/2006, R 394/2006-1, E, § 22-26; 09/02/2015, R 1636/20142, E (fig.)). 
Za črko „E“ se je štelo, da je opisna v zvezi z vetrnimi elektrarnami in deli zanje, generatorji, lopaticami rotorja za vetrne elektrarne, rotorji za vetrne elektrarne iz razreda 7, kontrolnimi stikali za vetrne elektrarne, frekvenčnimi pretvorniki, instrumenti za merjenje, signaliziranje in preverjanje (nadziranje), aparati in instrumenti za prevajanje, preklapljanje, transformiranje, akumuliranje, regulacijo ali kontrolo električne energije iz razreda 9 ter stolpi za vetrne elektrarne iz razreda 19, ker jo je mogoče razumeti kot sklicevanje na energijo ali elektriko (21/05/2008, T329/06, E, EU:T:2008:161, § 24-31; 08/09/2006, R 394/2006-1, E, § 22-26; 09/02/2015, R 1636/20142, E (fig.)).
An objection might also be justified in respect of goods and/or services meant for a wider public. 
Ugovor je lahko utemeljen tudi v zvezi z blagom in/ali storitvami, namenjenimi širši javnosti.
For example, the letters ‘S', ‘M' or ‘L' for clothing would give rise to an objection as these letters are used to describe a particular size of clothing, namely as abbreviations for ‘Small', ‘Medium' or ‘Large'. 
Na primer, črke „S“, „M“ ali „L“ v zvezi z oblačili bi bile sporne, ker se uporabljajo za opisovanje določene velikosti oblačil, in sicer kot kratice za „Small“, „Medium“ ali „Large“.
However, if it cannot be established that a given single letter is descriptive for the goods and/or services concerned, and provided that the trade mark applied for is not open to objection under another provision of Article 7(1) EUTMR, then the application should be accepted. 
Vendar velja, da je treba prijavo sprejeti, če ni mogoče ugotoviti, da je določena posamezna črka opisna za zadevno blago in/ali storitve, ter če blagovna znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, ni sporna na podlagi katere druge določbe člena 7(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
See the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 3, Non-Distinctive Trade Marks (Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR), paragraph 5.2 for further examples of where an objection under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR may be raised. 
Glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavje 3: Nerazlikovalne blagovne znamke (člen 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), odstavek 5.2 za dodatne primere, v katerih je mogoče vložiti ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Numerals 
Številke
In its judgment of 10/03/2011, C51/10 P, 1000, EU:C:2011:139, the Court of Justice ruled that signs composed exclusively of numerals with no graphic modifications may be registered as trade marks (paras 29-30). 
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 10/03/2011, C51/10 P, 1000, EU:C:2011:139, odločilo, da se lahko znaki, sestavljeni izključno iz številk, ki niso grafično spremenjene, registrirajo kot blagovne znamke (točki 29 in 30).
The Court referred by analogy to its previous judgment of 09/09/2010, C265/09 P, α, EU:C:2010:508, in respect of single letters (para. 31) and emphasised that trade marks consisting of numerals must be examined with specific reference to the goods and/or services concerned (para. 32). 
Sodišče je po analogiji napotilo na predhodno sodbo z dne 09/09/2010, C265/09 P, α, EU:C:2010:508, glede posameznih črk (točka 31) in poudarilo, da je treba blagovne znamke, ki so sestavljene iz številk, preizkusiti ob upoštevanju zadevnega blaga in/ali storitev (točka 32).
Therefore, a numeral may be registered as a European Union trade mark only if it is distinctive for the goods and services covered by the application for registration (para. 32) and is not merely descriptive or otherwise non-distinctive for those goods and services. 
Tako se lahko znak, ki je sestavljen iz številk, registrira kot blagovna znamka Evropske unije samo, če ima razlikovalni učinek za blago in storitve, ki jih zajema prijava za registracijo (točka 32), in ni samo opisno ali drugače nerazlikovalno za to blago in storitve.
For example, the Boards of Appeal confirmed the refusal of the trade marks ‘15' (12/05/2009, R 72/20092, 15) and ‘60' (23/09/2015, R 553/20154, 60) applied for in respect of ‘clothing, footwear, headgear' in Class 25. 
Na primer, odbor za pritožbe je potrdil zavrnitev blagovnih znamk „15“ (12/05/2009, R 72/20092, 15) in „60“ (23/09/2015, R 553/20154, 60), za kateri je bila prijava vložena za „oblačila, obutev, pokrivala“ iz razreda 25.
The board considered in the first case that that the numeral ‘15' is linked directly and specifically to these goods, as it contains obvious and direct information regarding their size (paras 15-22). 
Odbor je v prvi zadevi menil, da je številka „15“ neposredno in specifično povezana s tem blagom, ker vsebuje očitno in neposredno informacijo o njegovi velikosti (točke od 15 do 22).
In the second decision, it held that the indication of size 60, whether it exists or might exist, would naturally be understood and connected to measurement (size) by the relevant public (para. 19). 
V drugi odločbi je menilo, da bi upoštevna javnost navedbo velikosti 60, če obstaja ali bi lahko obstajala, razumela in povezovala z mero (velikostjo) (točka 19).
The Board also confirmed the refusal of the sign ‘15' for ‘beers' in Class 32, as practical experience of the marketing of the relevant goods - relied upon by the Office - showed that a number of very strong beers with an alcohol content of 15 % volume exist on the EU market (12/05/2009, R 72/20092, 15, § 15-22). 
Poleg tega je odbor potrdil zavrnitev znaka „15“ za „pivo“ iz razreda 32, ker so praktične izkušnje v zvezi s trženjem zadevnega blaga, na katere se je opiral Urad, pokazale, da na trgu EU obstaja več vrst zelo močnega piva z vsebnostjo alkohola 15 vol. % (12/05/2009, R 72/20092, 15, § 15-22).
It is well known that numerals are often used to convey relevant information as to the goods and/or services concerned. 
Znano je, da se številke pogosto uporabljajo za izražanje pomembnih informacij glede zadevnega blaga in/ali storitev.
For example, in the following scenarios an objection would apply on the ground that the sign applied for is descriptive since it refers to: 
Na primer, v naslednjih primerih bi se vložil ugovor na podlagi razloga, da je znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, opisen, ker se nanaša na:
the date of production of goods/provision of services, when this factor is relevant in respect of the goods/services concerned. 
datum proizvodnje blaga/opravljanja storitev, kadar je ta dejavnik pomemben v zvezi z zadevnim blagom/storitvami.
For instance, 1996 or 2000 for wines would give rise to an objection, since the age of the wine is a very relevant factor when it comes to the purchasing choice; 2020 would give rise to an objection also for events as it could be considered the year of an event; 
Na primer, znak 1996 ali 2000 za vina bi privedel do ugovora, ker je starost vina zelo pomemben dejavnik, ko gre za izbiro pri nakupu; 2020 bi privedel do ugovora tudi za dogodke, ker se ga lahko povezuje z letom dogodka,
size: in addition to the previous examples 15 and 60 for clothing, 1 600 for cars, 185/65 for tyres, 10 for women's clothing in the UK, 32 for women's clothing in France; 
velikost: poleg predhodnih primerov 15 in 60 za oblačila, 1 600 za avtomobile, 185/65 za pnevmatike, 10 za ženska oblačila v Združenem kraljestvu, 32 za ženska oblačila v Franciji,
quantity: 200 for cigarettes; 
količina: 200 za cigarete,
telephone codes: 0800 or 0500 in the UK, 800 in Italy, 902 in Spain, etc.; 
telefonske klicne kode: 0800 ali 0500 v Združenem kraljestvu, 800 v Italiji, 902 v Španiji itd.,
the time of provision of services: 24/7; 
čas opravljanja storitev: 24/7,
the power of goods: 115 for engines or cars; 
moč blaga: 115 za motorje ali avtomobile,
alcoholic content: 4.5 for lager, 13 for wines; 
vsebnost alkohola: 4.5 za lager, 13 za vina,
the number of pieces: 1 000 for puzzles. 
število delov: 1 000 za sestavljanke.
2.9 Names of colours 
Imena barv