natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In other words, the Office considers that even if all spirit drinks are comparable products, the relevant consumers will not establish a link between a bottle of whisky marketed under the trade mark ‘POLISH TASTE' and vodka protected by the designation ‘Polish vodka', taking into account the differences between whisky and vodka (e.g. different characteristics, ingredients and taste) and the fact that the PGI ‘Polish vodka' is not fully reproduced in the trade mark. 
Z drugimi besedami, Urad ob upoštevanju razlik med viskijem in vodko (npr. druge značilnosti, sestavine in okus) ter dejstva, da ZGO „Polish vodka“ ni v celoti reproducirana v blagovni znamki, meni, da tudi če so vse žgane pijače primerljivi proizvodi, upoštevni potrošnik ne bo ustvaril povezave med steklenico viskija, ki se trži pod blagovno znamko „POLISH TASTE“, in vodko, zaščiteno z ZGO „Polish vodka“.
Similarly, the expression ‘M. 
Podobno izraz „M.
Müller - Real Bavarian Quality of Bodensee) for beef evokes the PGI ‘Bayerisches Rindfleisch' (beef from Bavaria). 
Müller - Prava bavarska kakovost z Bodenskega jezera) za govedino prikazuje ZGO „Bayerisches Rindfleisch“ (bavarska govedina).
However, the Office considers that the same expression for poultry will not evoke the PGI ‘Bayerisches Rindfleisch'. 
Urad pa meni, da enak izraz za perutnino ne navaja ZGO „Bayerisches Rindfleisch“.
The Office considers that even if meat products are comparable, the relevant consumers will not establish a link between poultry meat marketed under the trade mark ‘M. 
MÜLLER - ECHTE BAYERISCHE QUALITÄT VON BODENSEE“, in govedino, zaščiteno z ZGO „Bayerisches Rindfleisch“.
MÜLLER - ECHTE BAYERISCHE QUALITÄT VON BODENSEE' and beef protected by the designation ‘Bayerisches Rindfleisch', taking into account the differences between beef and poultry and the fact that the PGI ‘Bayerisches Rindfleisch' is not fully reproduced in the trade mark. 
Predpisi EU o označbi ZOP/ZGO zajemajo sklicevanja na različne izraze, ki jih Urad vse razlaga kot sopomenke za primerljivo blago.
The EU PDO/PGI regulations contain references to different expressions, all interpreted by the Office as synonyms of comparable goods. 
Urad si različna izraza, uporabljena v členu 102(1) in členu 103(2) Uredbe (EU) št.
Specifically for wines, the different terms used in Articles 102(1) and 103(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 (‘product falling under one of the categories listed in Part II of Annex VII' and ‘comparable products' respectively) are interpreted by the Office as synonyms referring to the same concept. 
1308/2013 („proizvod, ki spada v eno od kategorij s seznama v delu II Priloge VII“ oziroma „primerljivi proizvodi“), zlasti za vina razlaga kot sopomenki, ki se nanašata na isti pojem.
For ease of reference, the categories listed in Part II of Annex VII can be grouped in: (i) wine; (ii) sparkling wine; (iii) grape must; (iv) wine vinegar. 
Za lažje sklicevanje je mogoče kategorije iz dela II Priloge VII združiti v: (i) vino, (ii) peneče vino, (iii) grozdni mošt in (iv) vinski kis.
They are classified into the following categories: aromatised wines; aromatised wine-based drinks; and aromatised wine-product cocktails. 
Razvrščeni so v naslednje kategorije: aromatizirana vina, aromatizirane pijače na osnovi vina in aromatizirani koktajli iz vinskih proizvodov.
The notion of comparable goods must be understood restrictively and is independent of the analysis of similarity between goods in trade mark law. 
Pojem primerljivega blaga, ki ga je treba razumeti restriktivno, je neodvisen od analize podobnosti med blagom v okviru zakonodaje o znamkah.
Accordingly, the criteria set out in the judgment of 29/09/1998, C39/97, Canon, EU:C:1998:442, should not necessarily be adhered to, although some of them may be useful. 
V skladu s tem ni treba nujno upoštevati meril iz sodbe 29/09/1998, C39/97, Canon, EU:C:1998:442, čeprav so lahko nekatera med njimi koristna.
For example, given that a PDO/PGI serves to indicate the geographical origin and the particular qualities of a product, criteria such as the nature of the product or its composition are more relevant than, for instance, whether or not goods are complementary. 
Ker se na primer ZOP/ZGO uporablja za označevanje geografskega porekla in posebnih lastnosti proizvoda, so merila, kot je vrsta proizvoda ali njegova sestava, pomembnejša kot na primer to, ali je blago komplementarno ali ne.
In particular, the CJEU (14/07/2011, C4/10 & C27/10, BNI Cognac, EU:C:2011:484, § 54) has developed certain criteria for determining whether goods are comparable, specifically whether or not the products have common objective characteristics, such as method of elaboration, physical appearance of the product or use of the same raw materials. 
Sodišče (14/07/2011, C4/10 & C27/10, BNI Cognac, EU:C:2011:484, § 54) je razvilo nekatera merila za določanje, ali je blago primerljivo, še zlasti, ali imajo proizvodi skupne objektivne lastnosti, kot so način izdelave, fizični videz proizvoda ali uporaba istih surovin.
In addition, factors such as whether the products are consumed, from the point of view of the relevant public, on largely identical occasions, or whether or not they are distributed through the same channels and/or subject to similar marketing rules, can be taken into account in order to confirm whether goods are comparable. 
Poleg tega je mogoče za potrditev, ali je blago primerljivo, upoštevati dejavnike, kot so, ali zadevna javnost proizvode uživa v pretežno enakih okoliščinah, ali se distribuirajo po istih distribucijskih mrežah in/ali zanje veljajo podobna tržna pravila.
Although it is not possible in these Guidelines to list all the possible scenarios, the following are some examples of comparable products. 
Čeprav v teh smernicah ni mogoče navesti vseh možnih scenarijev, so v nadaljevanju ponazorjeni nekateri primeri primerljivih proizvodov.
Depending on the specific goods, the applicant may overcome an objection against comparable goods by restricting the list of goods. 
Prijavitelj lahko glede na posebno blago odpravi ugovor zoper primerljivo blago z omejitvijo seznama blaga.
4.3 Restrictions of the list of goods 
V skladu s členom 103(1) Uredbe (EU) št.
Objections raised under Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR may be waived if the relevant goods are restricted to comply with the specifications of the PDO/PGI in question. 
Ugovore, vložene na podlagi člena 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, je mogoče razveljaviti, če je upoštevno blago omejeno, da bi bilo v skladu s specifikacijami zadevne ZOP/ZGO.
Restriction of goods can be a complex task, which may depend to a large extent on a case-by-case examination. 
Omejitev blaga je lahko zapletena naloga, ki je morda precej odvisna od preizkušanja vsakega primera posebej.
Products identical to those covered by the PDO/PGI must be restricted in order to meet the specifications of the PDO/PGI. 
Proizvode, ki so identični tistim, zaščitenim z ZOP/ZGO, je treba omejiti za dosego skladnosti s specifikacijami ZOP/ZGO.
The proper wording is ‘[name of the product] complying with the specifications of the [PDO ‘X']/PGI ‘X']'. 
Ustrezno besedilo je „[ime proizvoda] v skladu s specifikacijami [ZOP ‚X﻿ /ZGO ‚X﻿ “.
No other wording should be proposed or allowed. 
Drugačno besedilo se ne sme predlagati ali dovoliti.
Restrictions such as ‘[name of the product] with the [PDO ‘X']/PGI ‘X']' or ‘[name of the product] originating in [name of a place]' are not acceptable. 
Omejitve, kot so „[ime proizvoda] z [ZOP ,X﻿ /ZGO ,X﻿ “ ali „[ime proizvoda] s poreklom iz [ime kraja]“, niso sprejemljive.
The category of products that includes those covered by the PDO/PGI should be restricted as follows: 
Kategorijo proizvodov, ki vključuje proizvode, zaščitene z ZOP/ZGO, je treba omejiti na naslednji način:
For wines and aromatised wines, the restriction should designate wines and aromatised wines that comply with the specifications of the PDO/PGI. 
Za vina in aromatizirana vina je treba v omejitvi označiti vina in aromatizirana vina, ki so skladna s specifikacijami ZOP/ZGO.
The category of products is found in the Extract from the E-Bacchus Register under ‘registered as'. 
Kategorija proizvodov je na voljo v izpisu iz podatkovne zbirke E-Bacchus v rubriki „registrirano kot“.
For agricultural products and foodstuffs, the category of products that includes those covered by the PDO/PGI should be restricted to designate exactly the products covered by the PDO/PGI and complying with its specifications. 
Za kmetijske proizvode in živila je treba omejiti kategorijo proizvodov, ki vključuje proizvode, zaščitene z ZOP/ZGO, da se natančno označijo proizvodi, ki so zaščiteni z ZOP/ZGO in so skladni z njenimi specifikacijami.
The category of products that includes those covered by the PDO/PGI in question can be consulted in the ‘DOOR database. 
Kategorijo proizvodov, ki vključuje proizvode, zaščitene z zadevno ZOP/ZGO, si je mogoče ogledati v podatkovni zbirki DOOR.
The exact product covered can be found in the application document attached to the publication in the Official Journal (C series), also accessible through DOOR. 
Točno določeni zaščiteni proizvod je mogoče najti v prijavnem dokumentu, priloženem objavi v Uradnem listu (serija C), ki je dostopen tudi prek podatkovne zbirke DOOR.
Comparable products: 
Primerljivi proizvodi:
If the comparable products can be caught by the protection granted by the PGI/PDO, they should be included in the restriction, e.g. vinegar or wine based cocktails (e.g. sangria) are comparable to wine but still capable of being subjected to the PGI/PDO requirements. 
Če lahko primerljive proizvode zajame zaščita označbe ZGO/ZOP, morajo biti vključeni v omejitev, npr. kis ali koktajli na osnovi vina (npr. sangria) so primerljivi z vinom, vendar so lahko še vedno predmet zahtev ZGO/ZOP.
For foodstuff products see below under ‘products used as ingredients'. 
Za živilske proizvode glej v nadaljevanju Proizvodi, ki se uporabljajo kot sestavine.
An objection must be raised for comparable goods when they cannot be part of the restriction, for example when the goods applied for, although ‘comparable', do not include the product covered by the PDO/PGI. 
Vložiti je treba ugovor za primerljivo blago, če ne more biti del omejitve, na primer, kadar blago, za katero je vložena prijava, čeprav je primerljivo, ne vključuje proizvoda, ki ga zajema ZOP/ZGO.
5 PDOs/PGIs not Protected under EU Regulations 
510/2006 [ki je veljala takrat] „izčrpen“.
Paragraph 3 added that Member States could ‘maintain national protection of the names communicated in accordance with paragraph 1 until such time as a decision on registration has been taken' (04/03/1999, C87/97, Cambozola, EU:C:1999:115, § 18). 
510/2006, s katero je bila nadomeščena) je določal, da so morale države članice „obvesti[ti] Komisijo, katera od njihovih pravno zaščitenih imen […] [so] žel[ele] registrirati“ v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
In other words, the EU system of protection comprising the above EU Regulations overrides and replaces national protection of PDOs/PGIs for agricultural products and foodstuffs, wines, aromatised wines and spirit drinks. 
Z drugimi besedami, sistem zaščite EU, ki ga sestavljajo zgoraj navedene uredbe EU, razveljavi in nadomesti nacionalno zaščito označb ZOP/ZGO za kmetijske proizvode in živila, vina, aromatizirana vina in žgane pijače.
In light of the foregoing: 
Glede na zgoraj navedeno:
geographical indications for wines, spirits and agricultural products and foodstuffs that now qualify for a PDO/PGI under EU Regulations and in the past enjoyed protection by means of national legislation do not fall within the scope of Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR. 
geografske označbe za vina, žgane pijače ter kmetijske proizvode in živila, ki zdaj v skladu z uredbami EU izpolnjujejo pogoje za ZOP/ZGO in so bile v preteklosti zaščitene z nacionalno zakonodajo, ne spadajo na področje uporabe člena 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Accordingly, they do not constitute, as such, and for that reason alone, a ground for refusal under Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR, unless they have also been registered at EU level. 
V skladu s tem kot take in samo iz tega razloga niso razlog za zavrnitev na podlagi člena 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, razen če so bile registrirane tudi na ravni EU.
Therefore, if, for example, a third party argues that an EUTM contains or consists of a geographical indication for wines that was registered in the past at national level in an EU Member State, the examiner will check whether the geographical indication is also registered at EU level as a PDO/PGI. 
Če na primer zato tretja oseba trdi, da blagovna znamka EU vsebuje geografsko označbo za vina, ki je bila v preteklosti registrirana na nacionalni ravni v državi članici EU, oziroma je iz nje sestavljena, bo preizkuševalec preveril, ali je takšna geografska označba registrirana tudi na ravni EU kot ZOP/ZGO.
If not, the third-party observations will be deemed not to raise serious doubts as regards Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR. 
V nasprotnem primeru se bo štelo, da pripombe tretje osebe ne vzbujajo resnih dvomov v zvezi s členom 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Member States had until 28/03/2017 to submit all relevant information for the protection of national PGIs at EU level to the Commission. 
Države članice so morale do 28. marca 2017 Komisiji predložiti vse ustrezne informacije za zaščito nacionalnih ZGO na ravni EU.
After that date, existing national PGIs that had not been notified to the Commission lost protection. 
Po tem datumu so obstoječe nacionalne ZGO, ki niso bile sporočene Komisiji, izgubile zaščito.
As a consequence, until 28/03/2017 both EU and national PGIs fell within the scope of Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR. 
Posledično so do 28. marca 2017 označbe ZGO na ravni EU in nacionalne ZGO spadale na področje uporabe člena 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
However, in those areas where no uniform EU system of protection is in place, PDOs/PGIs protected under national law fall within the scope of Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR. 
Na tistih področjih, na katerih ni vzpostavljen enoten sistem EU za zaščito, pa ZOP/ZGO, ki so zaščitene na podlagi nacionalnega prava, spadajo na področje uporabe člena 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
This is the case, in particular, for PDOs/PGIs for non-agricultural products. 
To velja predvsem za označbe ZOP/ZGO za nekmetijske proizvode.
Currently, neither the Commission nor the Office keeps a database listing the PDOs/PGIs protected under national law for non-agricultural products. 
Trenutno Komisija in Urad v podatkovni zbirki ne vodita seznama ZOP/ZGO za nekmetijske proizvode, ki so zaščitene na podlagi nacionalnega prava.
Given the inherent difficulty in identifying such PDOs/PGIs, the Office will in these cases rely principally on observations by third parties. 
Urad bo zaradi neizogibnih težav pri opredeljevanju takih ZOP/ZGO v takšnih primerih v glavnem upošteval pripombe tretjih oseb.
5.2 PDOs/PGIs from non-EU countries 
Označbe ZOP/ZGO iz držav, ki niso članice EU
The following situations refer to PDOs/PGIs from non-EU countries that are not simultaneously registered at EU level. 
Naslednji primeri se nanašajo na ZOP/ZGO iz držav, ki niso članice EU, in ki hkrati niso registrirane na ravni EU.
The geographical indication is protected only in the non-EU country of origin under its national legislation 
Geografska označba je zaščitena le v državi, ki ni članica EU, in ki je država porekla, na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje
Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR does not apply since the non-EU-country geographical indication is not recognised and protected expressis verbis under EU legislation. 
Člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se ne uporablja, ker geografska označba države, ki ni članica EU, ni izrecno priznana in zaščitena v skladu z zakonodajo EU.
In this respect, note that the provisions of the TRIPs Agreement are not such as to create rights upon which individuals may rely directly before the courts by virtue of EU law (14/12/2000, C300/98 & C392/98, Dior and Others, EU:C:2000:688, § 44). 
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da določbe sporazuma TRIPS ne morejo ustvariti pravic, na katere se lahko posamezniki na podlagi prava EU neposredno sklicujejo pred sodiščem (14/12/2000, C300/98 & C392/98, Dior and Others, EU:C:2000:688, § 44).
Example: ‘Miel Blanc d'Oku' or ‘Poivre de Penja' from Cameroon. 
Primer: „Miel Blanc d'Oku“ ali „Poivre de Penja“ iz Kameruna.
For non-EU-country PDOs/PGIs protected in a Member State by virtue of an international agreement signed by that Member State (and not the EU), see paragraph 5.2 c) below. 
Za označbe ZOP/ZGO iz držav, ki niso članice EU, in ki so v državi članici zaščitene na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, ki ga je podpisala zadevna država članica (in ne EU), glej odstavek 5.2 c) v nadaljevanju.
Nevertheless, when the EUTM application contains or consists of one such protected geographical indication, it must also be assessed whether or not the EUTM may be considered descriptive and/or deceptive under Article 7(1)(c) and (g) EUTMR in accordance with the general rules set out in these Guidelines. 
Če blagovna znamka EU kljub temu vsebuje takšno zaščiteno geografsko označbo oziroma je iz nje sestavljena, je treba presoditi tudi, ali je mogoče blagovno znamko EU v skladu s splošnimi pravili iz teh Smernic šteti za opisno in/ali zavajajočo na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) in (g) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
For example, where a third party observes that an EUTM application consists of the term ‘Murakami' (invented example), which is a PGI for spirits in accordance with the national legislation of country X, Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR will not apply for the reasons set out above, but it must be examined whether or not the EUTM will be perceived as a descriptive and/or deceptive sign by the relevant EU consumers. 
Če na primer tretja oseba ugotovi, da je prijava blagovne znamke EU sestavljena iz izraza „Murakami“ (izmišljen primer), ki je v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo države X ZGO za žgane pijače, se člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov ne bo uporabljal, vendar je treba preizkusiti, ali bodo upoštevni potrošniki EU blagovno znamko EU zaznavali kot opisen in/ali zavajajoč znak.
The geographical indication is protected under an agreement to which the European Union is a contracting party 
Geografska označba je zaščitena na podlagi sporazuma, katerega pogodbenica je Evropska unija
The EU has signed a number of trade agreements with non-EU countries that protect geographical indications. 
EU je z državami, ki niso članice EU, sklenila številne trgovinske sporazume za zaščito geografskih označb.
These instruments typically include a list of the geographical indications, as well as provisions on their conflicts with trade marks. 
Ti akti običajno vključujejo seznam geografskih označb in določbe o njihovem navzkrižju z znamkami.
The content and degree of precision may nevertheless vary from one agreement to another. 
Vsebina in stopnja natančnosti pa se lahko med posameznimi sporazumi kljub temu razlikujeta.
Geographical indications from non-EU countries are protected at EU level after the relevant agreement has entered into force. 
Geografske označbe iz držav, ki niso članice EU, so na ravni EU zaščitene, ko začne veljati zadevni sporazum.
In this respect, it is settled case-law that a provision of an agreement entered into by the EU with non-EU countries must be regarded as being directly applicable when, in view of the wording, purpose and nature of the agreement, it may be concluded that the provision contains a clear, precise and unconditional obligation that is not subject, in its implementation or effects, to the adoption of any subsequent measure (14/12/2000, C300/98 & C392/98, Dior and Others, EU:C:2000:688, § 42). 
V zvezi s tem je ustaljena sodna praksa, da je treba v zvezi z določbo sporazuma, ki ga EU sklene z državami, ki niso članice EU, šteti, da se neposredno uporablja, kadar je mogoče na podlagi ubeseditve, namena in narave sporazuma skleniti, da določba vključuje jasno, natančno in brezpogojno obveznost, ki z vidika izvajanja ali učinkov ne zahteva sprejetja nobenih naknadnih ukrepov (14/12/2000, C300/98 & C392/98, Dior and Others, EU:C:2000:688, § 42).
The scope of protection given to these PGIs by non-EU countries is defined through the substantive provisions of the agreement concerned. 
Obseg varstva, ki ga tem označbam ZGO dodelijo države, ki niso članice EU, je določen z vsebinskimi določbami zadevnega sporazuma.
In the light of this, EUTMs that contain or consist of a non-EU-country PDO/PGI that is protected by an agreement to which the EU is a contracting party (and that is not simultaneously registered under the EU regulations) are examined, on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with the specific substantive provisions of the agreement in question on the refusal of conflicting trade marks, taking into account the case-law cited above. 
Glede na navedeno se blagovne znamke EU, ki vsebujejo ZOP/ZGO države, ki ni članica EU, in ki ni zaščitena s sporazumom, katerega pogodbenica je EU (in hkrati ni registrirana v skladu s predpisi EU), oziroma so iz nje sestavljene, preizkusijo za vsak primer posebej, in sicer v skladu s posebnimi vsebinskimi določbami zadevnega sporazuma o zavrnitvi nasprotujočih si znamk in ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedene sodne prakse.
The mere fact that a PDO/PGI from a non-EU country is protected by those instruments does not automatically imply that an EUTM that contains or consists of the PDO/PGI must be refused: this will depend on the content and scope of the agreement's relevant provisions. 
Dejstvo, da je ZOP/ZGO iz države, ki ni članica EU, zaščitena s temi instrumenti, ne pomeni samodejno, da je treba zavrniti blagovno znamko EU, ki vsebuje ZOP/ZGO ali je sestavljena iz nje: to je odvisno od vsebine in obsega ustreznih določb sporazuma.
As regards the relevant point in time for the protection of such PDOs/PGIs, a case-by-case approach is necessary. 
Glede upoštevnega trenutka za zaščito takih ZOP/ZGO je potreben pristop na podlagi posameznega primera.
PDOs/PGIs included in the initial agreement are normally protected as of the date when the agreement enters into force. 
ZOP/ZGO, vključene v prvotni sporazum, so običajno zaščitene od datuma, na katerega začne veljati sporazum.
However, the list of protected PDOs/PGIs can subsequently be updated in the ‘second generation agreements'. 
Seznam zaščitenih ZOP/ZGO se lahko nato posodobi v sporazumih druge generacije.
In these cases, the relevant priority date varies from agreement to agreement: in some cases the priority date may be the date of the non-EU-country's request to update the list and not the date when the Commission accepts the inclusion of the PDOs/PGIs. 
V teh primerih je upoštevni datum prednostne pravice različen glede na posamezni sporazum: v nekaterih primerih je lahko datum prednostne pravice datum zahtevka države, ki ni članica EU, o posodobitvi seznama, in ne datum, ko Komisija sprejme vključitev označb ZOP/ZGO.
The Office keeps a public database where information on non-EU-country PDO/PGIs protected in the EU under international agreements is included. 
Urad vodi javno podatkovno zbirko, v katero so vključene informacije o označbah ZOP/ZGO iz držav, ki niso članice EU, in ki so v EU zaščitene na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov.
It is accessible here: 
Do nje je mogoče dostopati prek naslednje povezave:
It should be noted that the trade agreements signed by the EU with non-EU countries typically have annexed to them a list of the PDOs/PGIs registered at EU level that are also to be protected in the non-EU countries in question (11/05/2010, T237/08, Cuvée Palomar, EU:T:2010:185, § 104-108; 19/06/2013, R 1546/20114, FONT DE LA FIGUERA). 
Upoštevati je treba, da je trgovinskim sporazumom, ki jih EU sklene s državami, ki niso članice EU, običajno priložen seznam ZOP/ZGO, registriranih na ravni EU, ki bodo zaščitene tudi v zadevnih državah, ki niso članice EU (11/05/2010, T237/08, Cuvée Palomar, EU:T:2010:185, § 104-108; 19/06/2013, R 1546/20114, FONT DE LA FIGUERA).