natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Office will base its decision only on reasons on which both sides have had an opportunity to submit observations, and will identify those items of evidence not taken into account due to not fulfilling the requirements of Article 55 EUTMDR. 
Urad bo odločbo sprejel samo na podlagi obrazložitev, h katerim sta obe stranki imeli možnost predložiti pripombe, in bo navedel dokazila, ki jih ni upošteval, ker niso izpolnjevala zahtev iz člena 55 Delegirane uredbe.
No such specific provisions as to the format of document or items of evidence exist for RCD proceedings. 
Za postopke v zvezi z registriranimi modeli Skupnosti ne veljajo nobene take posebne določbe glede formata dokumenta ali dokazil.
Therefore, documents or items of evidence submitted by one party will be communicated to the other parties as soon as possible, and the Office may set the other parties a time limit of, in principle, 2 months to reply. 
Dokumenti ali dokazila, ki jih predloži ena stranka, se tako nemudoma pošljejo drugim strankam, Urad pa lahko tem strankam določi načeloma dvomesečni rok, da odgovorijo nanje.
For further information on oral proceedings, see paragraph 5 below. 
Za več informacij o ustnih postopkih glej odstavek 5 v nadaljevanju.
4.2 Oral evidence and inspections 
Zaslišanje in pregledi
This refers to evidence taken in oral proceedings, such as hearing the oral evidence of parties, witnesses or experts, or carrying out inspections. 
To se nanaša na dokazila, pridobljena v ustnem postopku, kot je zaslišanje strank, prič ali izvedencev, in na opravljanje pregledov.
Only in exceptional cases will the Office decide to hear oral evidence, in particular because of the cumbersome nature of the procedure, which is liable to protract the proceedings, and because of the cost, which will have to be borne by the unsuccessful party in inter partes proceedings or, in some cases, by both parties. 
Urad se samo v izjemnih primerih odloči za zaslišanje, zlasti zaradi zapletenosti ustnega postopka, zaradi česar se lahko postopek podaljša, in zaradi stroškov, ki jih mora v danem primeru kriti neuspešna stranka v postopku inter partes, v nekaterih primerih pa obe stranki.
If the Office invites one of the parties to give evidence orally, it will advise the other parties accordingly so that they can attend. 
Če Urad eno od strank pozove na zaslišanje, o tem ustrezno obvesti druge stranke, da se zaslišanja lahko udeležijo.
Similarly, when the Office summons an expert or a witness to a hearing, it will advise the parties concerned. 
Tudi kadar Urad na zaslišanje pozove izvedenca ali pričo, o tem obvesti zadevne stranke.
These may be present and put questions to the person giving evidence. 
Te so lahko prisotne in osebi, ki je zaslišana, postavljajo vprašanja.
4.3 Specific means of evidence 
Posebni načini pridobivanja dokazil
4.3.1 Commissioning of experts by the Office 
Urad pooblasti izvedence
Opinions by experts will be used only as a last resort because they involve substantial costs and protract the proceedings. 
Izvedenska mnenja se uporabijo le kot zadnja možnost, saj ustvarijo precejšnje stroške in podaljšajo postopek.
It is up to the Office to decide whether or not to commission an expert's opinion, who to appoint as expert and what form the opinion should take. 
Urad odloči, ali je treba naročiti izvedensko mnenje ali ne, kdo je imenovan za izvedenca in kakšno obliko naj ima mnenje.
However, the Office does not maintain a list of experts because it uses experts as a means of taking evidence only by way of exception. 
Urad ne vodi seznama izvedencev, saj način pridobivanja dokazil z izvedenci uporablja le izjemoma.
The terms of reference of the expert include: 
Navodila izvedencu vključujejo:
a precise description of their task; 
natančen opis njegove naloge,
the deadline for submitting their opinion; 
rok za predložitev mnenja,
the names of the parties to the proceedings; 
imena strank v postopku,
details of any costs to be reimbursed by the Office. 
podrobnosti o katerih koli stroških, ki jih Urad povrne.
The expert opinion must be submitted in the language of the proceedings or accompanied by a translation into that language. 
Izvedensko mnenje je treba predložiti v jeziku postopka ali pa mu mora biti priložen prevod v navedeni jezik.
A copy of any written opinion, and of the translation if needed, must be submitted to the parties. 
Strankam je treba predložiti kopijo vsakega pisnega mnenja in po potrebi prevoda.
If the Office considers the report sufficient, and if the parties accept this form of report, it will in principle be used only in its written form. 
Če Urad meni, da je mnenje zadostno, in če se stranke strinjajo s to obliko, se načeloma uporabi le pisno.
The submission of an oral report or the hearing of oral evidence given by the expert will therefore be at the Office's discretion. 
Možnost ustne predložitve mnenja ali zaslišanja izvedenca tako Urad uporabi le po svoji presoji.
The parties can object to an expert on the grounds of incompetence or a conflict of interest, or because the expert was previously involved in the dispute or is suspected of partiality. 
Stranke lahko izvedencu ugovarjajo zaradi nesposobnosti, nasprotja interesov, njegove predhodne vključenosti v spor ali domneve pristranskosti.
No refusal may be based on the appointed expert's nationality. 
Zavrnitev ne sme temeljiti na državljanstvu imenovanega izvedenca.
If a party objects to the expert, the Office will rule on the objection. 
Če stranka ugovarja izvedencu, o ugovoru odloči Urad.
The grounds that may be cited for objecting to an expert are the same as those for objecting to an examiner or Board of Appeal member pursuant to Article 169 EUTMR and Article 44(4) CDIR. 
Razlogi, zaradi katerih lahko stranke ugovarjajo izvedencu, so enaki kot v primeru ugovarjanja preizkuševalcu ali članu odbora za pritožbe v skladu s členom 169 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in členom 44(4) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti.
4.3.2 Affidavits 
Izjave pod prisego
Sworn or affirmed statements in writing or statements having a similar effect under the law of the State in which the statement is drawn up are equally admissible as evidence if submitted by a party. 
Zaprisežene ali potrjene pisne izjave ali izjave, ki imajo podoben učinek po zakonu države, v kateri je izjava sestavljena, so enako dopustne kot dokazila, če jih predloži stranka.
In order for a statement to be considered sworn or affirmed, it must be understood by the parties that making a false statement would be considered a criminal offence under the law of the Member State in which the document was drawn up. 
Da bi se izjava štela za zapriseženo ali potrjeno, morajo stranke razumeti, da se lažna izjava po zakonu države članice, v kateri je bila sestavljena, šteje za kaznivo dejanje.
Where that is not the case, the document will be considered simply as any other written document or statement (28/03/2012, T214/08, Outburst, EU:T:2012:161, § 32 and the case-law cited therein). 
V nasprotnem primeru se dokument preprosto šteje kot vsak drug pisni dokument ali izjava (28/03/2012, T214/08, Outburst, EU:T:2012:161, § 32 in tam navedena sodna praksa).
The evidential value of an affidavit is relative (28/03/2012, T214/08, Outburst, EU:T:2012:161, § 33). 
Dokazna moč pisne izjave je relativna (28/03/2012, T214/08, Outburst, EU:T:2012:161, § 33).
In assessing the evidential value of such a document, the Office will consider first and foremost the credibility of the account it contains. 
Pri ocenjevanju dokazne moči takega dokumenta Urad najprej in predvsem prouči verodostojnost vsebovanega pričevanja.
It will then take account, in particular, of the person who produced the document, the circumstances in which it came about, the person to whom it was addressed and whether, on the face of it, the document appears sound and reliable (07/06/2005, T303/03, Salvita, EU:T:2005:200, § 42 and the case-law cited therein; 18/11/2015, T813/14, Cases for portable computers, EU:T:2015:868, § 26). 
Zatem upošteva zlasti izvor dokumenta, okoliščine njegove izdelave, njegovega naslovnika in se vpraša, ali se glede na njegovo vsebino zdi razumen in zanesljiv (07/06/2005, T303/03, Salvita, EU:T:2005:200, § 42 in tam navedena sodna praksa, 18/11/2015, T813/14, Cases for portable computers, EU:T:2015:868, § 26).
Affidavits containing detailed and concrete information and/or that are supported by other evidence have a higher probative value than very general and abstractly drafted statements. 
Izjave pod prisego, ki vsebujejo podrobne in konkretne podatke ter so potrjene z drugimi dokazili, imajo večjo dokazno vrednost kot zelo splošne in splošno napisane izjave.
The mere fact that affidavits from third parties are made according to a predetermined draft provided by the interested party (parties) does not in itself affect their reliability and credibility, and does not call into question their probative value since the veracity of their contents is certified by the signatory (16/09/2013, T200/10, Avery Dennison, EU:T:2013:467, § 73). 
Dejstvo, da tretje osebe podajo izjave pod prisego, ki so oblikovane po predhodno določenem osnutku, ki ga zagotovi(-jo) zainteresirana(-e) stranka(-e), ne vpliva na njihovo zanesljivost in verodostojnost ter ne vzbuja dvoma o njihovi dokazni vrednosti, saj resničnost njihove vsebine potrdi podpisnik (16/09/2013, T200/10, Avery Dennison, EU:T:2013:467, § 73).
4.3.3 Inspections 
Pregledi
Only in very exceptional circumstances will the Office carry out an inspection in situ. 
V izjemnih okoliščinah lahko Urad opravi pregled na kraju samem.
If it does decide to carry out an inspection, it will take an interim decision to that end, stating the means by which it intends to obtain evidence (in the present case, an inspection), the relevant facts to be proved, and the date, time and place of the inspection. 
Če se odloči za to možnost, sprejme vmesno določbo, v kateri navede, kako namerava pridobiti dokazila (v obravnavanem primeru je to pregled), upoštevna dejstva, ki jih je treba dokazati, ter datum, čas in kraj pregleda.
The date fixed for the inspection must allow the party concerned sufficient time to prepare for it. 
Datum, določen za pregled, mora biti takšen, da ima zadevna stranka dovolj časa, da se pripravi na pregled.
If the inspection cannot take place for any reason, the proceedings will continue based on the evidence on file. 
Če se pregled iz katerega koli razloga ne more opraviti, se postopek nadaljuje na podlagi dokazil v spisu.
5 Oral Proceedings 
Ustni postopek
Articles 96 to 97 EUTMR 
Člena 96 in 97 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Articles 49 to 55 EUTMDR 
Členi 49 do 55 Delegirane uredbe
Articles 64 to 65 CDR 
Člena 64 in 65 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Articles 42 to 46 and 82 CDIR 
Členi 42 do 46 in 82 Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Article 96 EUTMR and Article 64 CDR provide that the Office may hold oral proceedings. 
Člen 96 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člen 64 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti določata, da lahko Urad izvede ustni postopek.
Any unofficial contacts such as telephone conversations will not be considered to constitute oral proceedings within the meaning of Article 96 EUTMR and Article 64 CDR. 
Neuradni stiki, kot so telefonski pogovori, se ne štejejo za ustni postopek v smislu člena 96 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 64 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti.
The Office will hold oral proceedings either on its own initiative or at the request of any party to the proceedings only when it considers these to be absolutely necessary. 
Urad izvede ustni postopek na svojo pobudo ali na zahtevo katere koli stranke v postopku le, kadar meni, da je ta zares potreben.
This will be at the Office's discretion (20/02/2013, T378/11, Medinet, EU:T:2013:83, § 72 and the case-law cited therein; 16/07/2014, T66/13, Flasche, EU:T:2014:681, § 88). 
O tem presodi Urad (20/02/2013, T378/11, Medinet, EU:T:2013:83, § 72 in tam navedena sodna praksa; 16/07/2014, T66/13, Flasche, EU:T:2014:681, § 88).
In the vast majority of cases it will be sufficient for the parties to present their observations in writing. 
V veliki večini primerov zadostuje, da stranke svoje pripombe predložijo v pisni obliki.
5.1 Summons to oral proceedings 
Poziv na ustni postopek
Where the Office has decided to hold oral proceedings and to summon the parties, the period of notice may not be less than one month unless the parties agree to a shorter period. 
Če se je Urad odločil izvesti ustni postopek in pozvati stranke, rok obvestila ne sme biti krajši od enega meseca, razen če se stranke strinjajo s krajšim rokom.
Since the purpose of any oral proceedings is to clarify all outstanding points before the final decision is taken, the Office, in its summons, should draw the parties' attention to the points that need to be discussed in order for the decision to be taken. 
Ker je namen ustnega postopka pojasniti vsa nerešena vprašanja pred sprejetjem končne odločbe, Urad v pozivu stranke opozori na vprašanja, v zvezi s katerimi je potrebna razprava.
Where the Office considers it necessary to hear oral evidence from the parties, witnesses or experts, it will take an interim decision stating the means by which it intends to obtain evidence, the relevant facts to be proven and the date, time and place of the hearing. 
Kadar Urad presodi, da je treba zaslišati stranke, priče ali izvedence, sprejme vmesno odločbo, v kateri navede, kako namerava pridobiti dokazila, upoštevna dejstva, ki jih je treba dokazati, ter datum, čas in kraj pregleda.
The period of notice will be at least one month, unless the parties concerned agree to a shorter period. 
Rok obvestila je najmanj en mesec, razen če se zadevne stranke strinjajo s krajšim rokom.
The summons will provide a summary of this decision and state the names of the parties to the proceedings and details of the costs, if any, that the witnesses or experts may be entitled to have reimbursed by the Office. 
Poziv vsebuje povzetek navedene odločbe, imena strank v postopku in podrobnosti o morebitnih stroških, ki jih mora Urad morda povrniti pričam ali izvedencem.
The Office may also offer the possibility of taking part in the oral proceedings by video conference or other technical means. 
Urad lahko tudi ponudi možnost sodelovanja v ustnem postopku prek videokonference ali z drugimi tehničnimi sredstvi.
If required, and in order to facilitate the hearing, the Office may invite the parties to submit written observations or to submit evidence prior to the oral hearing. 
Če je to potrebno in da bi olajšal potek zaslišanja, lahko Urad stranke pozove, naj pred ustno obravnavo predložijo pisne pripombe ali dokazila.
The period fixed by the Office for receiving these observations must allow sufficient time for them to reach the Office and then be forwarded to the other parties. 
Urad določi tak rok za pošiljanje takšnih pripomb, da ima dovolj časa, da jih prejme in nato posreduje drugim strankam.
The parties may likewise submit evidence in support of their arguments on their own initiative. 
Stranke lahko dokazila v podporo svojim trditvam predložijo tudi na svojo pobudo.
However, if this evidence ought to have been produced at an earlier stage of the proceedings, the Office will decide whether these items of evidence are admissible, taking account of the principle of hearing both parties, where appropriate. 
Vendar če bi morala biti takšna dokazila predložena v zgodnejši fazi postopka, Urad odloči, ali so ta dokazila dopustna, pri čemer upošteva načelo, da je treba zaslišati obe stranki, če je to primerno.
5.2 Language of oral proceedings 
Jezik ustnega postopka
Oral proceedings will be in the language of the proceedings unless the parties agree to use a different official EU language. 
Ustni postopek poteka v jeziku postopka, razen če se stranke dogovorijo, da bodo uporabljale drug uradni jezik EU.
The Office may communicate in oral proceedings in another official EU language and it may, upon prior written request, authorise a party to communicate in another official EU language provided that simultaneous interpretation of the communication into the language of proceedings can be made available. 
Urad lahko v ustnem postopku komunicira v drugem uradnem jeziku EU in na predhodno pisno zahtevo lahko stranki odobri, da komunicira v drugem uradnem jeziku EU, če se lahko zagotovi simultano tolmačenje sporočanja v jezik postopka.
The costs of providing simultaneous interpretation will be paid by the party making the request or by the Office as the case may be. 
Stroške zagotavljanja simultanega tolmačenja krije stranka, ki je podala zahtevo, oziroma Urad, odvisno od primera.
5.3 Course of the oral proceedings 
Potek ustnega postopka
Oral proceedings before the examiners, the Opposition Division and the department in charge of the Register will not be public. 
Ustni postopek pred preizkuševalci, oddelkom za ugovore in oddelkom za vodenje registra ni javen.
Oral proceedings, including the delivery of the decision, will be public before the Cancellation/Invalidity Division and the Boards of Appeal, insofar as the department before which the proceedings are taking place does not decide otherwise in cases where admission of the public could have serious and unjustified disadvantages, in particular for a party to the proceedings. 
Ustni postopek pred oddelkom za izbris/ugotovitev ničnosti in odbori za pritožbe, vključno z izrekom odločbe, pa je javen, če oddelek, pred katerim poteka postopek, ne odloči drugače, kar stori v zadevah, v katerih bi prisotnost javnosti lahko imela resne in neupravičene negativne posledice, zlasti za stranko v postopku.
If a party who has been duly summoned to oral proceedings does not appear before the Office, the proceedings may continue without them. 
Če se stranka, ki je bila pravočasno pozvana na zaslišanje, pozivu ne odzove, se lahko postopek pred Uradom nadaljuje brez navedene stranke.
If the Office invites a party to give evidence orally, it will advise the other parties accordingly so that they can attend. 
Če Urad stranko pozove na ustno predložitev dokazov, o tem ustrezno obvesti druge stranke, da se zaslišanja lahko udeležijo.
At the end of the oral proceedings the Office will allow the parties to present their final pleadings. 
Ob koncu ustnega postopka Urad strankam omogoči končni govor.
5.4 Minutes of oral evidence and of oral proceedings 
Zapisnik o zaslišanju in ustnem postopku
Article 53 EUTMDR 
Člen 53 Delegirane uredbe
Article 46 CDIR 
Člen 46 Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Minutes of the taking of oral evidence and of oral proceedings will be confined to the essential elements. 
Zapisnik o zaslišanju in ustnem postopku je omejen na bistvene elemente.
In particular, they will not contain the verbatim statements made nor be submitted for approval. 
Zlasti ne vsebuje dobesednih izjav in se ne predloži v odobritev.
However, any statements by experts or witnesses will be recorded so that at further instances the exact statements made can be verified. 
Vse izjave izvedencev ali prič pa se posnamejo, da se lahko v nadaljevanju sojenja preverijo natančne izjave.
Where oral proceedings or the taking of evidence before the Office are recorded, the recording will replace the minutes. 
Kadar se ustni postopek ali pridobivanje dokazil pred Uradom posname, posnetek nadomesti zapisnik.
The parties will receive a copy of the minutes. 
Stranke prejmejo izvod zapisnika.
5.5 Costs of taking evidence in oral proceedings 
Stroški pridobivanja dokazil z ustnim postopkom
The Office may make the taking of evidence conditional upon a deposit by the party requesting it. 
Urad lahko za pridobivanje dokazil, ki ga zahteva stranka, postavi pogoj predplačila, ki ga plača ta stranka.
The amount will be fixed by the Office based on an estimate of the costs. 
Urad znesek določi na podlagi ocene stroškov.
The witnesses and experts summoned or heard by the Office will be entitled to reimbursement of expenses for travel and subsistence, including an advance. 
Priče in izvedenci, ki jih Urad pozove in pričajo pred Uradom, so upravičeni do povračila potnih stroškov in stroškov bivanja, vključno s predujmom.
They will also be entitled to compensation for loss of earnings and payment for their work. 
Upravičeni so tudi do nadomestila za izgubljeni zaslužek in plačila za svoje delo.
Where the Office decides to adopt means of taking evidence that require oral evidence from witnesses or experts, the Office will bear the cost of this. 
Kadar se Urad odloči, da bo dokazila pridobival na način, pri katerem je potrebno zaslišanje prič ali izvedencev, stroške tega krije Urad.
However, where one of the parties has requested oral evidence, then that party will bear the cost, subject to a decision on the apportionment of costs in inter partes proceedings. 
Kadar pa zaslišanje zahteva ena od strank, stroške krije ta stranka v skladu z odločbo o porazdelitvi stroškov v postopkih inter partes.
6 Decisions 
Odločbe
6.1 Contents 
Vsebina
Articles 38 to 41 CDIR 
Člen 62 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
The decision will cover the relevant points raised by the parties. 
Odločba zajema upoštevne točke, ki so jih navedle stranke.
In particular, if there are different outcomes for some goods and services of the EUTM application or registration concerned, the decision will make clear which of the goods and services are refused and which are not. 
Zlasti če obstajajo različni izidi za nekatero blago in storitve v zvezi z zadevno prijavo blagovne znamke EU ali registracijo, mora biti v odločbi jasno navedeno, katere vrste blaga in storitve se zavrnejo in katere ne.
At the end of the decision, there will also be a notice advising of the right to appeal. 
Če takega obvestila ni, to ne vpliva na zakonitost odločbe in rok za vložitev pritožbe.
6.2 Apportionment of costs 
Člen 33 Delegirane uredbe
Article 105(5), Article 109 and Annex I A(33)EUTMR 
Člen 70 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Articles 37 and 79 CDIR 
Člen 24 Priloge k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št.
Article 24 of the Annex to the CDFR 
2246/2002 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o pristojbinah za modele Skupnosti)
‘Costs' comprise the costs incurred by the parties to the proceedings, chiefly (i) representation costs and costs for taking part in oral hearings (‘representation costs' means the costs for professional representatives within the meaning of Article 120 EUTMR and Article 78 CDR, not for employees - not even those from another company with economic links); and (ii) the opposition, cancellation or invalidity fee. 
Stroški pomenijo stroške, ki jih imajo stranke v postopku, zlasti (i) stroške zastopanja (stroški zastopanja pomenijo stroške za poklicne zastopnike v smislu člena 120 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 78 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti, ne za zaposlene - tudi če so ti iz drugega podjetja, s katerim je stranka ekonomsko povezana) in stroške sodelovanja na ustnih obravnavah ter (ii) pristojbino za ugovor, izbris ali ugotovitev ničnosti.
‘Apportionment of costs' means that the Office will decide whether and to what extent the parties have to reimburse each other. 
Porazdelitev stroškov pomeni, da Urad odloči, ali in v kakšni višini morajo stranke druga drugi povrniti te zneske.
It does not involve the relationship with the Office (fees paid, the Office's internal costs). 
To ne vključuje razmerja z Uradom (plačane pristojbine, notranji stroški Urada).
In ex parte proceedings, there is no decision on costs, nor any apportionment of costs. 
Pri postopku ex parte ni odločbe o stroških niti porazdelitve stroškov.
The Office will not reimburse any fees paid (the exceptions are Article 33 EUTMDR and Article 37 CDIR, refund of the appeal fee in certain cases, and Article 105(5) EUTMR, refund of the fee for continuation of proceedings if the application is not granted). 
Urad ne povrne plačanih pristojbin (izjemi sta povračilo pristojbine za pritožbe v nekaterih primerih v skladu s členom 33 Delegirane uredbe in členom 37 Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti ter povračilo pristojbine za nadaljevanje postopka, če Urad zahtevo zavrne, v skladu s členom 105(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).