natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
15/09/2011, R 2100/20101, SEXIALIS / CIALIS et al. The documents submitted (press articles, sales figures, surveys) showed that the earlier sign, CIALIS, was intensively used before the filing date of the EUTM application, that the products under the mark CIALIS were marketed in several Member States where they enjoyed a consolidated position among the leading brands, and that there was a high degree of recognition when compared with the market leader Viagra. 
15/09/2011, R 2100/20101, SEXIALIS / CIALIS et al. Iz predloženih dokumentov (člankov, podatkov o prodaji, raziskav) je bilo razvidno, da se je prejšnji znak CIALIS intenzivno uporabljal pred datumom vložitve prijave blagovne znamke EU, da so se izdelki pod znamko CIALIS tržili v več državah članicah, kjer so imeli utrjen položaj med vodilnimi znamkami, in da je imel znak visoko stopnjo prepoznavnosti v primerjavi z znamko VIAGRA, ki je bila vodilna na trgu.
Large and constantly growing market share and sales numbers also showed ‘the vast expansion of CIALIS' (para. 55). 
Iz velikega in nenehno rastočega tržnega deleža ter podatkov o prodaji je bil prav tako razviden velik porast znamke CIALIS“ (točka 55).
Reputation was not sufficiently proven, in particular because none of the documents referred to recognition of the earlier trade mark by the relevant end consumers. 
Ugled ni bil zadovoljivo dokazan, zlasti ker se noben dokument ni nanašal na prepoznavnost prejšnje znamke pri upoštevnih končnih potrošnikih.
Nor was any evidence about the market share of the opponent's goods submitted. 
Predložen ni bil tudi noben dokaz o tržnem deležu blaga vložnika ugovora.
Information about market share is particularly important in the sector in which the opponent had its core business (handbags, transport items, accessories and clothing), as it is ‘a quite atomized and competitive sector' and ‘there are many different competitors and designers in that product range' (paras 59 to 61). 
Informacije o tržnem deležu so zlasti pomembne v sektorju, v katerem je vložnik ugovora opravljal svoj osnovni posel (ročne torbice, potovalni izdelki, dodatki in oblačila), ki je precej razpršen in konkurenčen sektor in v katerem je veliko različnih tekmecev in oblikovalcev takih izdelkov“ (točke od 59 do 61).
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Although, for reasons of force majeure, it was not possible for the earlier trade mark to become well known by traditional methods, that is, through sales of the product, it did become extremely well known as a result of promotional activities, through the trade mark being extensively, continually and constantly publicised in the specialist press and at sector fairs, thereby reaching virtually the whole of the three relevant sectors of the public. 
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ/FLATZ Čeprav prejšnja znamka zaradi višje sile ni mogla postati znana po tradicionalnih metodah, torej s prodajo izdelka, je postala zelo znana zaradi promocijskih dejavnosti, nenehnega obširnega obveščanja javnosti o znamki v specializiranem tisku in na sektorskih sejmih, zaradi česar je dejansko dosegla vse tri upoštevne dele javnosti.
The limited presence of the product on the market by no means prevented it from becoming well known by the relevant public that, on the relevant date, FLATZ was the trade mark with which the opponent identified its electronic bingo machines (paras 41, 42, 50 and 51). 
Omejena navzočnost izdelka na trgu upoštevni javnosti ni preprečila, da na zadevni datum ne bi bila dobro seznanjena z dejstvom, da je FLATZ znamka, s katero vložnik ugovora označuje svoje naprave za elektronski bingo (točke 41, 42, 50 in 51).
The lack of figures regarding market share held by the trade mark ARENA in the relevant countries was not in itself capable of calling the finding of reputation into question. 
Nerazpoložljivost podatkov o tržnem deležu znamke ARENA v upoštevnih državah sama po sebi ni bila dovolj, da bi bila zaradi nje vprašljiva ugotovitev glede ugleda.
First, the list of factors to be taken into consideration in order to ascertain the reputation of an earlier mark only serves to illustrate examples, as all the relevant evidence in the case must be taken into consideration and, second, the other detailed and verifiable evidence submitted by the opponent is already sufficient in itself to prove conclusively the substantial degree of recognition of the ARENA mark amongst the relevant public (para. 59). 
Prvič, seznam dejavnikov, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri ugotavljanju ugleda prejšnje znamke se uporablja samo za ponazoritev primerov, saj je treba upoštevati vse pomembne dokaze v zadevi, in drugič, vsi drugi podrobni in preverljivi dokazi, ki jih je predložil vložnik ugovora, že sami po sebi zadostujejo za prepričljivo potrditev znatne stopnje prepoznavnosti znamke ARENA pri upoštevni javnosti (točka 59).
If the earlier mark were so well known in the 27 Member States of the EU for TV broadcasting and magazines, it should have been easy for the opponent to provide information about ‘the reach of the mark' just before 2008, when the EUTM application was filed. 
Če bi bila prejšnja znamka tako dobro znana v 27 državah članicah EU zaradi televizijskih oddaj in revij, bi moral vložnik ugovora brez težav zagotoviti informacije o „dosegu znamke“ neposredno pred letom 2008, ko je bila vložena prijava blagovne znamke EU.
The magazine sales figures did not cover the right period. 
Podatki o prodaji revij se niso nanašali na pravilno obdobje.
Nor did the documents submitted give any indication of the extent to which the public was aware of the mark (paras 16 and 18). 
V predloženih dokumentih tudi ni bilo navedeno, v kolikšnem obsegu je bila znamka znana javnosti (točki 16 in 18).
The evidence submitted showed a particularly impressive duration of use (over 30 years) and geographical extent of use (over seventy-five countries worldwide, including the Member States concerned) for the ARENA brand (para. 55). 
Iz predloženih dokazov sta bila razvidna zlasti dolgo trajanje uporabe (več kot trideset let) in velik geografski obseg uporabe znamke ARENA (več kot 75 držav po vsem svetu, vključno z upoštevnimi državami članicami) (točka 55).
29/03/2012, T369/10, Beatle, EU:T:2012:177 (appeal dismissed in 14/05/2013, C294/12 P, EU:C:2013:300) The Beatles group was considered to be a group with an exceptional reputation, lasting for more than 40 years (para. 36). 
29/03/2012, T369/10, Beatle, EU:T:2012:177 (pritožba zavrnjena dne 14/05/2013, C294/12 P, EU:C:2013:300) Skupina The Beatles je bila skupina z izjemnim ugledom, ki traja več kot 40 let (točka 36).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Evidence of the promotion of BOTOX in English in the scientific and general-interest press was sufficient to establish the mark's reputation amongst both the general public and health-care professionals (paras 65 and 66). 
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Dokazi o promociji znamke BOTOX v angleškem jeziku v znanstvenem in splošnem tisku so zadostovali za ugotovitev ugleda znamke pri splošni javnosti in med strokovnimi zdravstvenimi delavci (točki 65 in 66).
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Although, for reasons of force majeure, it was not possible for the earlier trade mark to become well known by traditional methods, that is, through sales of the product, it did become extremely well known as a result of promotional activities, through the trade mark being extensively, continually and constantly publicised in the specialist press and at sector fairs, thereby reaching virtually the whole of the three relevant sectors of the public. 
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Čeprav prejšnja znamka zaradi višje sile ni mogla postati znana po tradicionalnih metodah, torej s prodajo izdelka, je postala zelo znana zaradi promocijskih dejavnosti, nenehnega obširnega obveščanja javnosti o znamki v specializiranem tisku in na sektorskih sejmih, zaradi česar je dejansko dosegla vse tri upoštevne dele javnosti.
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112 KENZO / KENZO; 25/03/2013, R 1364/20122, KENZO / KENZO The opponent's goods have been advertised and articles have been written about them in many of the world's leading fashion-related lifestyle magazines, and in some of Europe's leading mainstream periodicals. 
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112 KENZO / KENZO; 25/03/2013, R 1364/20122, KENZO / KENZO Oglasi in članki o blagu vložnika ugovora so bili objavljeni v številnih vodilnih, z modo povezanih revijah o življenjskem slogu in v nekaterih vodilnih splošnih evropskih medijih.
In line with the case-law, the reputation of KENZO for the said goods is confirmed. 
V skladu s sodno prakso je ugled znamke KENZO v zvezi z navedenim blagom potrjen.
The goods for which the earlier mark has reputation are cosmetics, perfumes and clothing. 
Blago, v zvezi s katerim ima prejšnja znamka ugled, so kozmetični izdelki, parfumi in oblačila.
Because of its substantial reputation, the earlier mark KENZO possesses an ‘undisputable allure' that can be transferred to nearly any luxury product (para. 33). 
Zaradi znatnega ugleda je prejšnja znamka KENZO nedvomno privlačna, kar se lahko prenese na skoraj vsak luksuzni izdelek (točka 33).
A subsequent case confirmed this reputation (para. 33). 
Poznejša zadeva je potrdila ta ugled (točka 33).
It is apparent from Ferrero's various advertising campaigns on Italian television (including Rai) that the earlier mark was widely exposed to viewers in 2005 and 2006. 
Iz različnih oglaševalskih kampanj Ferrera na italijanski televiziji (vključno z RAI) je razvidno, da so bili gledalci v letih 2005 in 2006 precej izpostavljeni prejšnji znamki.
Many of these spots appear to have been broadcast at peak viewing times (e.g. during Formula 1 Grand Prix coverage) (para. 41). 
Veliko teh oglasov je bilo očitno prikazanih v času največje gledanosti (npr. med prenosom dirke za veliko nagrado v formuli 1) (točka 41).
11/01/2011, R 306/20104, CARRERA / CARRERA, (under appeal, 27/11/2014, T173/11, Carrera / CARRERA, EU:T:2014:1001) The opponent's trade mark is not only known per se but, due to the high price of sports cars and the opponent's intensive expenditure on advertising, and against the background of its successes in racing, the public associates it with an image of luxury, high technology and high performance (para. 31). 
11/01/2011, R 306/20104, CARRERA / CARRERA, (predmet pritožbe, 27/11/2014, T173/11, Carrera / CARRERA, EU:T:2014:1001) Znamka vložnika ugovora ni znana le sama po sebi, ampak jo zaradi visoke cene športnih avtomobilov in velikih izdatkov vložnika ugovora za oglaševanje, skupaj z njegovim uspehom na področju dirk, tudi javnost povezuje s podobo razkošja, visoke tehnologije in izjemne učinkovitosti (točka 31).
14/06/2012, R 1637/20115, made by APART since 1975 / Apart et al. The new evidence submitted by the appellant and accepted by BoA shows that the earlier mark had consistently been granted a high brand rating as well as prizes in surveys carried out by specialised companies in Poland between 2005 and 2009 (para. 30). 
14/06/2012, R 1637/20115, made by APART since 1975 / Apart et al. Iz novih dokazov, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, odbor za pritožbe pa jih je sprejel, je bilo razvidno, da je prejšnja znamka nenehno prejemala visoke ocene znamke in nagrade v raziskavah, ki so jih specializirane družbe na Poljskem opravile med letoma 2005 in 2009 (točka 30).
It was therefore considered that the appellant successfully proved reputation in Poland for jewellery, but did not prove reputation for the other goods and services covered by its earlier signs. 
Zato se je štelo, da je pritožnik na Poljskem uspešno dokazal ugled v zvezi z nakitom, ni pa dokazal ugleda za drugo blago in storitve, ki jih označujejo njegovi prejšnji znaki.
22/06/2004, T185/02, Picaro, EU:T:2004:189 (confirmed 12/01/2006, C361/04 P, Picaro, EU:C:2006:25) The Board of Appeal may take into consideration, in addition to the facts expressly put forward by the parties, facts that are well known, that is, which are likely to be known by anyone or that may be learnt from generally accessible sources. 
22/06/2004, T185/02, Picaro, EU:T:2004:189 (potrjena z dne 12/01/2006, C361/04 P, Picaro, EU:C:2006:25) Odbor za pritožbe lahko poleg dejstev, ki so jih izrecno navedle stranke, upošteva splošno znana dejstva, to so dejstva, ki jih lahko pozna vsak in jih je mogoče dobiti iz splošno dostopnih virov.
That exception must therefore be given a strict interpretation, defining its extent so as not to exceed what is necessary for achieving its object' (paras 29 to 32). 
Zaradi tega je treba to določbo razlagati ozko, pri čemer je njen obseg določen tako, da ne presega tistega, kar je nujno potrebno za dosego njenega cilja“ (točke od 29 do 32).
30/03/2009, R 1472/20072, El Polo / POLO It is common knowledge that the earlier mark is indeed a very famous brand, not only in France, but in most European countries, in large part due to the public's exposure to products at airport and duty free boutiques as well as long-standing advertising in widely circulated magazines. 
30/03/2009, R 1472/20072, El Polo / POLO Splošno znano je, da je prejšnja znamka resnično zelo slavna v Franciji in večini evropskih držav, predvsem zaradi izpostavljenosti javnosti tem izdelkom na letališčih in v prostocarinskih prodajalnah ter zaradi dolgotrajnega oglaševanja v zelo razširjenih revijah.
The weight of evidence required to support statements that are universally known to be true need not be great (para. 32). 
Za potrditev trditev, ki so splošno znane kot resnične, ni potrebno veliko dokazno breme (točka 32).
29/04/2010, R 295/20094, PG PROINGEC CONSULTORIA (fig.) / PROINTEC (fig.) et al. The content of the documentation submitted does not clearly demonstrate that the earlier marks enjoy a reputation. 
29/04/2010, R 295/20094, PG PROINGEC CONSULTORIA (fig.) / PROINTEC (fig.) et al. Iz vsebine predložene dokumentacije ni jasno razvidno, da imajo prejšnje znamke ugled.
The documentation emanates, in the main, from the respondent directly and contains information taken from its trade catalogues, its own advertising and documents downloaded from its website. 
Dokumentacija izvira predvsem neposredno od pritožnika in vsebuje informacije iz njegovih prodajnih katalogov, oglasov in dokumentov, prenesenih z njegovega spletnega mesta.
There is insufficient documentation/information from third parties to reflect clearly and objectively what precisely the respondent's position on the market is. 
Dokumentacija/informacije tretjih oseb ne zadostujejo za jasno in objektivno opredelitev natančnega položaja pritožnika na trgu.
Reputation not proved (para. 26). 
Ugled ni bil dokazan (točka 26).
16/11/2011, T500/10, Doorsa, As regards documents in the case file that come from the company itself, the General Court has held that, to assess the evidential value of such a document, account should be taken first and foremost of the credibility of the account it contains. 
16/11/2011, T500/10, Doorsa, Splošno sodišče je v zvezi z dokumenti v sodnem spisu, ki izhajajo iz same družbe, ugotovilo, da bi bilo treba za presojo dokazne vrednosti takih dokumentov upoštevati predvsem verodostojnost informacij, ki jih vsebujejo.
The General Court added that it is then necessary to take account, in particular, of the person from whom the document originates, the circumstances in which it came into being, the person to whom it was addressed and whether, prima facie, the documents appear sound and reliable (para. 49). 
Dodalo je, da je treba zato upoštevati zlasti izvor dokumenta, okoliščine njegove priprave in njegovega naslovnika ter ob tem presoditi, ali se dokumenti na prvi pogled zdijo smiselni in zanesljivi (točka 49).
12/05/2011, R 729/20091, SKYBLOG / SKY et al. The statement submitted by an expert consultancy firm in the area of digital media strategy in the UK attests to the fact that the opponent is ‘the leading supplier of digital television in the UK' and that ‘Sky has an enormous and impressive reputation' (para. 37). 
12/05/2011, R 729/20091, SKYBLOG / SKY et al. Izjava, ki jo je predložila izvedenska svetovalna družba na področju digitalne medijske strategije iz Združenega kraljestva, potrjuje, da je vložnik ugovora vodilni ponudnik storitev digitalne televizije v Združenem kraljestvu in da ima znamka Sky zelo velik in prepričljiv ugled (točka 37).
17/12/2010, T192/09, Seve Trophy, EU:T:2010:553 As far as judgments of Spanish courts are concerned, the European Union trade mark system is an autonomous system, consisting of a set of rules and objectives that are specific and applied independently of any national system (para. 79). 
17/12/2010, T192/09, Seve Trophy, EU:T:2010:553 Kar zadeva sodbe španskih sodišč, je sistem blagovne znamke EU avtonomni sistem, sestavljen iz sklopa pravil in ciljev, ki so specifični in se uporabljajo neodvisno od vseh nacionalnih sistemov (točka 79).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Decisions of the UK national office relating to the reputation of BOTOX are facts that may, if relevant, be taken into account by the General Court, despite the EUTM owners not being parties in those decisions (para. 78). 
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Odločbe nacionalnega urada Združenega kraljestva glede ugleda znamke BOTOX so dejstva, ki jih lahko Splošno sodišče upošteva, če so pomembna, kljub temu da imetniki blagovne znamke EU niso stranke v teh odločbah (točka 78).
(fig.) / FRESH & CLEAN et al. The cancellation applicant did not submit sufficient proof of the reputation of its trade marks. 
(fig.)/FRESH in CLEAN et seq. Vložnik zahteve za izbris ni predložil zadostnih dokazov o ugledu svojih znamk.
According to the extracts from the 2001 survey conducted in Italy, although the level of ‘prompted recognition' stands at 86 %, the rate of ‘spontaneous recognition' is only 56 %. 
Glede na izvlečke iz raziskave, opravljene leta 2001 v Italiji, je bila stopnja „naključne prepoznavnosti“ samo 56-odstotna, čeprav je bila stopnja „spodbujene prepoznavnosti“ 86-odstotna.
Moreover, no indication is given of the questions put to the people surveyed, making it impossible to determine whether the questions were really open and unassisted. 
Poleg tega vprašanja, zastavljena anketirancem, niso bila navedena, zaradi česar ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali so bila vprašanja resnično odprta in niso napeljevala k odgovoru.
The survey further fails to state for which goods the trade mark is known (para. 27). 
V raziskavi tudi ni navedeno, v zvezi s katerim blagom je znamka znana (točka 27).
27/03/2014, R 540/20132, Shape of a bottle (3D) The surveys do not seem to be carried out by the well-known GfK company, as the applicant argues, but rather by a Mr Philip Malivore who, according to his own declaration, is only ‘a former director of GfK'. 
27/03/2014, R 540/20132, Shape of a bottle (3D) Zdi se, da raziskav ni izvedlo znano podjetje GfK, kot trdi prijavitelj, ampak gospod Philip Malivore, ki je, kot je izjavil, samo „nekdanji direktor podjetja GfK“.
The Board is thus perplexed as to how a former employee of GfK can be authorised to use that company's logo on each and every page of the surveys when he is now ‘an independent market research consultant'. 
Odbor je zbegan glede tega, kako je lahko nekdanji zaposleni v podjetju GfK pooblaščen za uporabo logotipa podjetja na vsaki posamezni strani raziskav, če je zdaj „neodvisni svetovalec na področju tržnih raziskav“.
These facts cast considerable doubt on the source, reliability and independent nature of the surveys (para. 49). 
Ta dejstva vzbujajo precejšen dvom o viru, zanesljivosti in neodvisni naravi raziskav (točka 49).
/ COLOMBIANA LA NUESTRA The survey submitted by the opponent does not provide conclusive information to demonstrate that the earlier sign is well known to the Spanish public for aerated waters as the interviewees were carefully selected on the basis of their origin, that is, Colombians resident in Spain. 
/COLOMBIANA LA NUESTRA, R 1191/20104 Raziskava, ki jo je predložil vložnik ugovora, ne zagotavlja prepričljivih informacij, ki bi potrdile, da je prejšnji znak v španski javnosti dobro znan v zvezi s sodavicami, saj so bili anketiranci natančno izbrani na podlagi nacionalnosti, tj.
This is only a very small part of the population living in Spain. 
Kolumbijci, ki prebivajo v Španiji.
Moreover, the statements are not corroborated by conclusive data on the extent or turnover of the goods (para. 23). 
Poleg tega izjave niso bile podprte s prepričljivimi podatki o obsegu prometa blaga (točka 23).
In principle, samples of 1 000-2 000 interviewees are considered sufficient, provided they are representative of the type of consumer concerned. 
Načeloma se za zadostne štejejo vzorci od 1 000 do 2 000 anketirancev, če so reprezentativni za upoštevno vrsto potrošnikov.
The opponent's opinion poll was based on a sample of 500 interviewees, which is not sufficient in respect of the services for which reputation is claimed. 
Javnomnenjska raziskava, ki jo je predložil vložnik ugovora, je temeljila na vzorcu 500 anketirancev, kar ne zadostuje za storitve, v zvezi s katerimi se domneva njihov ugled.
According to the opinion poll, the logo of the earlier mark has been associated especially with services in the financial and insurance fields. 
V skladu z javnomnenjsko raziskavo je logotip prejšnje znamke povezan zlasti s storitvami na finančnem in zavarovalniškem področju.
Since the opposition is only based on Class 42 with regard to the earlier European Union trade mark, it does not cover financial and insurance services. 
Ker ugovor temelji izključno na razredu 42 v zvezi s prejšnjo blagovno znamko Evropske unije, ne zajema finančnih in zavarovalniških storitev.
Consequently, the opinion poll submitted is not suitable proof of the reputation of the opponent's European Union trade mark (para. 58). 
Posledično predložena javnomnenjska raziskava ni ustrezen dokaz o ugledu blagovne znamke Evropske unije vložnika ugovora (točka 58).
25/01/2011, R 907/20092, O2PLS / O2 et al. The many brand awards won by the mark were, together with the huge investment in advertising and the number of articles published in different publications, considered an important part of the evidence for reputation (para. 9(iii) and para. 27). 
25/01/2011, R 907/20092, O2PLS / O2 et al. Številne nagrade za blagovne znamke, ki jih je prejela znamka, skupaj z obsežnimi naložbami v oglaševanje in številom objav v različnih publikacijah, so se štele za pomemben del dokazov o ugledu (točki 9(iii) in 27).
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, confirmed 10/05/2012, C100/11 P The very existence of articles in a scientific publication or the general-interest press constitutes a relevant factor in establishing the reputation of the products marketed under the trade mark BOTOX amongst the general public, irrespective of the positive or negative content of those articles (para. 54). 
16/12/2010, T345/08 in T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, potrjena 10/05/2012, C100/11 P Objava člankov v znanstvenih publikacijah ali splošnem tisku je pomemben dejavnik pri ugotavljanju ugleda izdelkov, ki se tržijo pod znamko BOTOX, pri splošni javnosti, in to ne glede na njihovo pozitivno ali negativno vsebino (točka 54).