natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The element ‘force' has a weak distinctive character for the goods concerned. 
Element „force“ ima pri zadevnem blagu šibek razlikovalni učinek.
Low visual, phonetic and conceptual similarity - no likelihood of confusion. 
Nizka stopnja vizualne, zvočne in pojmovne podobnosti - ni verjetnosti zmede.
The presence of the ‘+' sign in both signs cannot generate a visual similarity as this is a mathematical symbol that implies a concept of increase, so it only enjoys a weak distinctive character (para. 29). 
Zaradi znaka „+“ v obeh znakih ne more nastati vizualna podobnost, saj je to matematični simbol, ki se nanaša na pojem povečanja, zato ima le šibak razlikovalni učinek (točka 29).
The signs share a weak similarity on the phonetic side because of the presence of the ‘+' sign (paras 35-36) - no likelihood of confusion. 
Znaka sta zaradi znaka „+“ malo zvočno podobna (točki 35 in 36) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
As regards the common initial part of the marks ‘visco', it is descriptive for the German public with relation to one of the main characteristics of the relevant goods (oils, greases and fuels), namely its viscosity (para. 57). 
Skupni prvi del znamk „visco“ se za nemško javnost opisno nanaša na eno od glavnih značilnosti zadevnega blaga (olja, masti in goriva), in sicer z viskoznostjo (točka 57).
The marks are only vaguely similar visually and phonetically - no likelihood of confusion. 
Znamki sta vizualno in zvočno le malce podobni - ni verjetnosti zmede.
The word premium is laudatory (para. 44). 
Beseda premium je poveličevalna (točka 44).
The coincidence leads only to a low visual and phonetic and an average conceptual similarity - no likelihood of confusion. 
Zaradi ujemanja obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne in zvočne podobnosti ter povprečna stopnja pojmovne podobnosti - ni verjetnosti zmede.
The word ‘ultimate' is a promotional word used to indicate the superior quality of the latest goods available on the market and, has no distinctive character at all (para. 22). 
Beseda „ultimate“ je promocijska, uporablja se za navedbo vrhunske kakovosti najnovejšega blaga, ki je na voljo na trgu, in nima nikakršnega razlikovalnega učinka (točka 22).
Even if both trade marks share this element, there is only a low visual and phonetic similarity (paras 47-48). 
Čeprav je ta element skupen obema blagovnima znamkama, obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne in zvočne podobnosti (točki 47 in 48).
No conceptual similarity overall (para. 49) - no likelihood of confusion. 
Na ravni znamk kot celote ni pojmovne podobnosti (točka 49) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
As regards the visual comparison, the figurative element representing a dog in the earlier mark constitutes the dominant one. 
Kar zadeva vizualno primerjavo, je figurativni element prejšnje znamke, ki prikazuje psa, prevladujoči element.
Given that the respective graphic elements are different, the coincidence in the word element ‘K9' leads to a visual similarity only to a low degree. 
Ker se grafični elementi med znamkama razlikujejo, zaradi ujemanja besednega elementa „K9“ obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti.
The marks are phonetically similar to a high degree. 
Znamki imata visoko stopnjo zvočne podobnosti.
As to the conceptual comparison, the contested mark does not contain any figurative element conveying the concept of a dog, the marks are not conceptually similar (paras 27-34). 
Kar zadeva pojmovno primerjavo, izpodbijana znamka ne vsebuje nobenega figurativnega elementa, ki izraža pomen psa, zato znamki pojmovno nista podobni (točke 27-34).
(NEGRA MODELO) 06/03/2002, R 536/20013; confirmed 15/02/2005, T169/02, EU:T:2005:46 
(NEGRA MODELO) 06/03/2002, R 536/20013; potrjena 15/02/2005, T169/02, EU:T:2005:46
The earlier trade mark was a Portuguese registration. 
Prejšnja blagovna znamka je bila registrirana na Portugalskem.
‘Negra' is descriptive for the relevant goods in Class 33, since it may be used in Portuguese to designate brown beer, i.e. the type of beer sold under the trade mark NEGRA MODELO. 
Izraz „Negra“ je za upoštevno blago iz razreda 33 opisen, ker se v portugalščini lahko uporabi za označitev temnega piva, tj. vrste piva, ki se prodaja pod blagovno znamko NEGRA MODELO.
The attention of the average Portuguese consumer will be focused on the coinciding word ‘modelo'. 
Pozornost povprečnega portugalskega potrošnika bo osredotočena na besedo „modelo“, ki se ujema.
Low visual, average phonetic and strong conceptual similarity - likelihood of confusion. 
Nizka stopnja vizualne, povprečna stopnja zvočne in visoka stopnja pojmovne podobnosti - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 3 Territory: EU Assessment: The figurative element of the mark applied for is as important as the word elements and has a significant impact on the overall visual impression given by that mark. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 3 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Figurativni element znamke, za katero je vložena prijava, je enako pomemben kot besedna elementa in ima precejšnji vpliv na celotni vizualni vtis, ki ga naredi ta znamka.
It is positioned above the word elements and occupies more space than both of those elements combined. 
Postavljen je nad besedna elementa in zavzema več prostora kot oba ta elementa skupaj.
Furthermore, it is distinctive for the goods at hand, as a duck has no connection with cosmetic or cleaning preparations. 
Poleg tega je za zadevno blago razlikovalen, saj raca ni povezana s kozmetičnimi ali čistilnimi pripravki.
In addition, the drawing of the duck is quite elaborate. 
Risba race je tudi precej umetelno izdelana.
Even if the element ‘GIOVANNI' is placed before the element ‘GALLI', there is only a low degree of visual similarity between the marks at issue, in view of the significant impact of the figurative element of the mark applied for on the overall impression given by that mark (paras 62-64, 72, 74). 
Čeprav je element „GIOVANNI“ postavljen pred element „GALLI“, med zadevnima znamkama obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti, saj ima figurativni element znamke, za katero je vložena prijava, precejšnji vpliv na celotni vtis, ki ga ustvarja ta znamka (točke 62-64, 72 in 74).
G&S: Classes 32 and 33 Territory: Poland Assessment: the figurative element of the mark applied for, consisting of the stylised representation of a bovine animal viewed in profile looking to the left and which may be perceived as a European bison, is of a similar size to that of the verbal element ‘wisent' and occupies a comparable space in that mark. 
Blago in storitve: Razreda 32 in 33 Ozemlje: Poljska Presoja: Figurativni element znamke, za katero je vložena prijava, ki ga sestavlja stiliziran prikaz goveda v profilu, ki gleda v levo in ki se ga lahko zazna kot zobra, je podobne velikosti kot besedni element wisent in v znamki zavzema primerljiv prostor.
As a result of its shape, its size, its colour and its position, that representation of a bison […] helps clearly to establish the image of the contested mark which the relevant public will retain in their mind, with the result that it cannot be discounted in the perception of that mark […]. 
Ta prikaz zobra je zaradi svoje oblike, velikosti, barve in položaja v pomoč pri ustvarjanju podobe izpodbijane znamke, ki si jo bo upoštevna javnost vtisnila v spomin, kar pomeni, da ga pri zaznavi te znamke ni mogoče zanemariti.
As regards the earlier mark, a naturalistic representation of a bison standing on four legs in a circle against a background of trees, coloured green, brown and black, is clearly perceptible in that mark. 
Pri prejšnji znamki je jasno zaznaven naturalističen prikaz zobra, ki stoji na štirih nogah, v krogu pred drevesi v ozadju, obarvan zeleno, rjavo in črno.
That representation of a bison occupies a central position and is of a slightly larger size than the only perceptible verbal element, the term ‘żubrówka', represented in yellow and black and placed above that representation. 
Ta prikaz zobra zavzema osrednji položaj in je malo večji od edinega zaznavnega besednega elementa, izraza „żubrówka“, prikazanega v rumeni in črni barvi ter postavljenega nad ta prikaz.
Therefore the figurative element consisting of a naturalistic representation of a bison cannot be discounted in the overall impression created by the earlier mark […]. 
Figurativnega elementa, ki ga sestavlja naturalističen prikaz zobra, pri celotnem vtisu, ki ga ustvarja prejšnja znamka, ni mogoče zanemariti.
Despite the presence of different verbal elements, as a whole the marks are visually similar to a low degree given the fact that they both contain a bison, the image of which will easily be retained by consumers in their memory as a result of their position within the marks at issue and their size (paras 76-77, 82, 85-86, 111, 113). 
Čeprav so prisotni različni besedni elementi, imata znamki kot celoti nizko stopnjo vizualne podobnosti, saj obe vsebujeta zobra, katerega podobo si potrošniki zlahka vtisnejo v spomin zaradi njenega položaja in velikosti v zadevnih znamkah (točke 76, 77, 82, 85, 86, 111 in 113).
G&S: Class 18 Territory: Spain, EU Assessment: the figurative elements of the earlier EUTM - namely, the oval and the geometric shape vaguely recalling a five-point star superimposed thereon - do not convey any identifiable conceptual content. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 18 Ozemlje: Španija, EU Presoja: Figurativna elementa prejšnje blagovne znamke EU, in sicer ovalno ozadje ter geometrijska oblika, ki nejasno spominja na peterokrako zvezdo na tem ozadju, ne ustvarjata prepoznavne pojmovne vsebine.
Consequently, it is highly unlikely that these figurative elements will hold the attention of the relevant consumer. 
Zato je malo verjetno, da bosta pritegnila pozornost upoštevnega potrošnika.
By contrast, although the verbal element does not convey any conceptual content either, the fact remains that it may be read and pronounced and that it is, therefore, likely to be remembered by consumers. 
Nasprotno pa, čeprav tudi besedni element ne izraža pojmovne vsebine, ostaja dejstvo, da ga je mogoče prebrati in izgovoriti, torej je verjetno, da si ga potrošniki zapomnijo.
Therefore, the verbal element of the earlier EUTM must be considered to dominate the visual impression made by that mark (para. 47). 
Zato je treba šteti, da besedni element prejšnje blagovne znamke EU prevlada nad vizualnim vtisom, ki ga navedena znamka ustvarja (točka 47).
G&S: Class 29 Territory: EU Assessment: visual similarity results from the fact that both have a unique verbal element very similar only differing in the final letter. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 29 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Obstaja vizualna podobnost zaradi dejstva, da imata obe znamki zelo podobna edinstvena besedna elementa, ki se razlikujeta le v zadnji črki.
Both figurative signs had the representation of a bird, an element that added to the similarity of the signs. 
Oba figurativna znaka vsebujeta prikaz ptice, kar še povečuje podobnost med znakoma.
The signs have little and minor differences only. 
Znaka imata le malo razlik, ki so majhne.
On the aural comparison both signs have a high degree of aural similarity having only one final letter difference. 
Znaka imata visoko stopnjo zvočne podobnosti, saj se razlikujeta le v eni, zadnji črki.
The conceptual comparison is not relevant as the verbal element of the signs had no meaning in some parts of the European Union (para. 38). 
Pojmovna primerjava ni pomembna, saj besedni element znakov v nekaterih delih Evropske unije nima pomena (točka 38).
G&S: Class 9 Territory: EU Assessment: ‘In respect of the figurative elements of which the sign is comprised, the Board considers that there is nothing in these elements that adds anything different to the contested sign other than some elements of decoration. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 9 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: „V zvezi s figurativnimi elementi, iz katerih je sestavljen znak, odbor meni, da pri njih ni ničesar, kar bi izpodbijanemu znaku dodalo kakšno razliko, razen nekaj okrasnih elementov.
The mere addition of banal figurative elements will not affect the perception of the sign by the relevant public' (para. 12). 
Samo z dodajanjem vsakdanjih figurativnih elementov upoštevna javnost znaka ne bo zaznavala drugače“ (točka 12).
22/05/2012, T60/11, EU:T:2012:252 (low visual and phonetic and average conceptual similarity) 
22/05/2012, T60/11, EU:T:2012:252 (nizka stopnja vizualne in zvočne podobnosti ter povprečna stopnja pojmovne podobnosti)
G&S: Classes 30, 31, 42 Territory: EU Assessment: the similarity of the marks is based solely on a word that has no distinctive character and would not be remembered by consumers as the key element of the marks at issue (para. 53). 
Blago in storitve: Razredi 30, 31 in 42 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Podobnost znamk temelji le na eni besedi, ki nima razlikovalnega učinka in si je potrošniki ne bi zapomnili kot ključno besedo zadevnih znamk (točka 53).
18/04/2011, R 1357/20092 (no visual or conceptual similarity, remote phonetic similarity) 
18/04/2011, R 1357/20092 (brez vizualne in pojmovne podobnosti, šibka zvočna podobnost)
G&S: Classes 5, 29, 30, 32 Territory: EU Assessment: the BoA took into account the non-distinctive and descriptive character of the word ‘Lactofree' for the relevant goods. 
Blago in storitve: Razredi 5, 29, 30 in 32 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Odbor za pritožbe je upošteval nerazlikovalni in opisni učinek besede „Lactofree“ za upoštevno blago.
The Board found the notable visual and conceptual differences between the signs (para. 98). 
Odbor je ugotovil precejšnje vizualne in pojmovne razlike med znakoma (točka 98).
(IBIZA REPUBLIC) 02/07/2009, T311/08, EU:T:2009:244 (low visual similarity, phonetic and conceptual dissimilarity) 
(IBIZA REPUBLIC) 02/07/2009, T311/08, EU:T:2009:244 (nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti, zvočna in pojmovna različnost)
G&S: Classes 25, 41, 43 Territory: France Assessment: taking into account the dominant character of the verbal element in the mark applied for, there is no phonetic and conceptual similarity and only a low degree of visual similarity between the signs (para. 58) - no likelihood of confusion. 
Blago in storitve: Razredi 25, 41 in 43 Ozemlje: Francija Presoja: Ob upoštevanju prevladujočega učinka besednega elementa v znamki, za katero je vložena prijava, ne obstaja zvočna in pojmovna podobnost, obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti med znakoma (točka 58) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
08/01/2010, R 280/20094 (visual, phonetic and conceptual dissimilarity) 
08/01/2010, R 280/20094 (vizualna, zvočna in pojmovna različnost)
Even in the area in question, ‘charitable fundraising; education, periodicals; medical services' (Classes 16, 36, 41, 45), the specific Maltese cross shape is not used exclusively by the appellant. 
„zbiranje dobrodelnih prispevkov; poučevanje; periodični tisk; zdravstvene storitve“ (razredi 16, 36, 41 in 45), ni edini, ki uporablja posebno obliko malteškega križa.
The EUTM application contains the unreservedly distinctive word sequence ‘Pro concordatia populorum' and cannot be reduced to its figurative element. 
Prijava blagovne znamke EU vsebuje popolnoma razlikovalno besedno zvezo „Pro concordatia populorim“, ki je ni mogoče skrčiti na figurativni element.
The signs are also dissimilar phonetically, as the opposing sign has no verbal elements. 
Znaka sta tudi zvočno različna, ker v izpodbijanemu znaku ni besednih elementov.
There is no conceptual similarity, as the EUTM application means ‘for the understanding of the peoples', a phrase that has nothing in common with the earlier sign. 
Ni pojmovne podobnosti, ker prijava blagovne znamke EU pomeni „za razumevanje ljudi“, ta stavek pa nima nič skupnega s prejšnjim znakom.
Therefore, there can be no likelihood of confusion, even in the case of the identical goods found only in Class 16. 
Zato ne more biti verjetnosti zmede, tudi če gre za enako blago, ki je le v razredu 16.
27/02/2002, R 68/20014 & R 285/20014 (high visual similarity) 
27/02/2002, R 68/20014 & R 285/20014 (visoka stopnja vizualne podobnosti)
G&S: Classes 18, 24, 25, 28 Territory: Benelux, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Austria Assessment: the wording ‘La Maison de la Fausse Fourrure' is not sufficient to reduce the impression of similarity between the conflicting marks. 
Blago in storitve: Razredi 18, 24, 25 in 28 Ozemlje: Beneluks, Nemčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Avstrija Presoja: Ubeseditev „La Maison de la Fausse Fourrure“ ne zadošča za to, da bi se zmanjšal vtis podobnosti med sovpadajočima znamkama.
In addition to its possibly descriptive nature, the Board notes that the wording is given, relative to the footprint device, a secondary position (it is placed under the device), a relatively limited size (four times smaller) and a conventional writing style (para. 22). 
Poleg tega, da je ubeseditev morda opisna, odbor ugotavlja, da ima v primerjavi z elementom odtisa stopinje drugoten položaj (postavljena je pod ta element), da je relativno omejene velikosti (štirikrat manjša) in da je zapisana v običajnem stilu pisave (točka 22).
G&S: Class 3 Territory: Germany, Spain Assessment: the figure of a moon, present in both signs, made the equivalence between the Spanish and English words ‘LUNA' and ‘MOON' clearer to Spanish consumers. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 3 Ozemlje: Nemčija, Španija Presoja: S podobo lune, ki je prisotna v obeh znakih, se je španskim potrošnikom še jasneje pokazala enakovrednost med špansko besedo „LUNA“ in angleško besedo „MOON“.
G&S: Classes 18, 25, 35 Territory: EU Assessment: visually, the trade marks are highly similar. 
Blago in storitve: Razredi 18, 25 in 35 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Vizualno sta si blagovni znamki zelo podobni.
An aural comparison is not possible. 
Zvočna primerjava ni mogoča.
G&S: Class 42 Territory: Spain Assessment: while both marks do not have any meaning and, thus, no conceptual comparison can be made, the trade marks are visually and phonetically highly similar, in particular because they coincide in their first four letters ‘ALEN'. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 42 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: čeprav sta obe znamki brez pomena in tako ni mogoča pojmovna primerjava, sta blagovni znamki vizualno in zvočno zelo podobni, zlasti ker se ujemata v prvih štirih črkah, „ALEN“.
It is generally accepted that people pay more attention to the first part of a trade mark, at least when they perceive the mark visually (para. 33). 
Splošno je sprejeto, da ljudje namenijo več pozornosti prvemu delu blagovne znamke, vsaj če znamko zaznavajo vizualno (točka 33).
G&S: Class 5 Territory: Greece Assessment: the signs share five of their six letters and the first two syllables are identical. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 5 Ozemlje: Grčija Presoja: Znaka imata pet črk od šestih enakih in enaka prva dva zloga.
There is a certain degree of visual similarity. 
Obstaja določena stopnja vizualne podobnosti.
Aurally the signs are highly similar as the initial part, which is normally the most important, is identical. 
Zvočno sta znaka zelo podobna, ker imata enak začetek, ki je navadno najpomembnejši.
Neither sign has a meaning in Greek (paras 35-36). 
V grščini sta oba znaka brez pomena (točki 35 in 36).
G&S: Class 5 Territory: EU Assessment: visually, the marks share some similarity due to the coinciding letters ‘C', ‘A', ‘L', ‘S' and ‘R' placed in the same order. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 5 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Vizualno sta si znamki nekoliko podobni, saj se ujemajo črke „C“, „A“, „L“, „S“ in „R“, ki so postavljene v enakem vrstnem redu.
Aurally, there is a low degree of similarity. 
Stopnja zvočne podobnosti je nizka.
Conceptually, the marks are similar insofar as they both contain the component ‘CAL'. 
Pojmovno sta znamki podobni, saj obe vsebujeta sestavni del „CAL“.
However, since this element clearly alludes to the kind of goods (containing ‘calcium'), not much weight can be given to this conceptual similarity (paras 21-23) - no likelihood of confusion. 
Ker pa ta element jasno namiguje na vrsto blaga (vsebuje „kalcij“), ta pojmovna podobnost ni zelo pomembna (točke 21-23) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
G&S: Class 30 Territory: Denmark, Finland, Sweden Assessment: the signs differ in the fifth letter and in their ending. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 30 Ozemlje: Danska, Finska, Švedska Presoja: Znaka se razlikujeta v peti črki in končnicah.
They are visually similar to an average degree. 
Vizualno sta si povprečno podobna.
In view of the length of the EUTM application, the signs differ in rhythm and intonation and are thus aurally similar to a low degree. 
Glede na dolžino prijave blagovne znamke EU se znaka razlikujeta po ritmu ter intonaciji in sta si torej malo zvočno podobna.
The distinctive character is below average. 
Razlikovalni učinek je podpovprečen.
G&S: Class 5 Territory: EU Assessment: visually, phonetically and conceptually the signs are similar insofar as they have the prefix ‘ALBU' (abbreviation of ‘albumin' or ‘albumen') in common. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 5 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Vizualno, zvočno in pojmovno sta si znaka podobna, ker imata enako predpono „ALBU“ (krajšava za „albumin“).
But this similarity is of little significance because the prefix is generic and so devoid of distinctiveness. 
Vendar ta podobnost ni pomembna, ker je predpona splošna in zato nima razlikovalnega učinka.
The second element of the earlier mark, ‘MAN', is visually, phonetically and conceptually completely different from the second element, ‘NORM', of the contested mark. 
Drugi element prejšnje znamke „MAN“ se vizualno, zvočno in pojmovno popolnoma razlikuje od drugega elementa „NORM“ v izpodbijani znamki.
G&S: Class 36 Territory: Spain Assessment: the overall visual impression of the conflicting marks is that they consist of two letters in an arbitrary figurative design that conveys the same impression. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 36 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Celoten vizualni vtis sovpadajočih znamk je, da sta sestavljeni iz dveh črk v poljubnem figurativnem oblikovanju, ki ustvarjata enak vtis.
The trade marks are considered similar. 
Blagovni znamki se štejeta kot podobni.
G&S: Classes 6, 7, 9. 11, 17 Territory: UK Assessment: it cannot be excluded that part of the relevant public will interpret the contested mark as the letter combination ‘GE' (paras 33-35). 
Blago in storitve: Razredi 6, 7, 9, 11 in 17 Ozemlje: Združeno kraljestvo Presoja: Ni mogoče izključiti, da bo del upoštevne javnosti izpodbijano znamko razumel kot kombinacijo črk „GE“ (točke 33-35).
The marks are phonetically identical and visually similar to a medium degree. 
Znamki sta zvočno enaki in imata srednjo stopnjo vizualne podobnosti.
As regards the conceptual comparison, it cannot be excluded that part of the relevant public will interpret the contested mark as the letter combination ‘GE'. 
Kar zadeva pojmovno primerjavo, ni mogoče izključiti, da bo del upoštevne javnosti izpodbijano znamko razumel kot kombinacijo črk „GE“.
G&S: Class 33 Territory: EU Assessment: from a visual point of view, the graphic stylisation of the earlier marks is very different compared with the contested mark. 
Blago in storitve: Razred 33 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Z vizualnega vidika je grafična stilizacija prejšnjih znamk zelo drugačna kot pri izpodbijani znamki.
The mere fact that one or both letters of the marks are identical is not enough to render the marks visually similar. 
Dejstvo, da sta ena ali obe črki znamk enaki, ni dovolj, da bi bile znamke vizualno podobne.
There is no aural similarity if the contested mark will be pronounced as ‘B' or ‘PB' as in short signs differences have a higher impact on the overall impression than in longer marks. 
Če se bo izpodbijana znamka izgovorila kot „B“ ali „PB“, ne bo zvočne podobnosti, saj imajo pri kratkih znakih razlike večji vpliv na celotni vtis kot pri daljših znamkah.
Conceptually, the contested mark and the earlier marks with no additional elements to the letter combination ‘AB' do not have a meaning in any of the relevant languages: the conceptual comparison remains thus neutral (paras 17-19). 
Pojmovno izpodbijana znamka in prejšnji znamki, ki poleg kombinacije črk „AB“ nimajo dodatnih elementov, nimajo pomena v nobenem izmed upoštevnih jezikov, tako da je rezultat pojmovne primerjave nevtralen (točke 17-19).