natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
7.3 Colour marks per se 22 
7.3 Barvna znamka kot taka 21
1.1 Nature of global assessment 
Narava celovite presoje
A likelihood of confusion (including a likelihood of association) exists if there is a risk that the public might believe that the goods or services in question, under the assumption that they bear the marks in question, come from the same undertaking or, as the case may be, from economically linked undertakings. 
Verjetnost zmede (vključno z verjetnostjo povezovanja) obstaja, kadar obstaja tveganje, da bi javnost lahko mislila, da zadevno blago ali storitve izvirajo iz istega podjetja ali gospodarsko povezanih podjetij, na podlagi predpostavke, da so označeni z zadevnimi znamkami.
If a significant part of the relevant public of the goods or services at issue may be confused as to the origin of the goods or services, this is sufficient. 
Za ugotovitev, da obstaja verjetnost zmede, je dovolj, če pomemben del upoštevne javnosti ni prepričan o izvoru zadevnega blaga ali storitev.
Therefore, there is no need to establish that all actual or potential consumers of the relevant goods or services are likely to be confused. 
Zato ni treba ugotavljati, ali obstaja verjetnost zmede pri vseh dejanskih ali potencialnih potrošnikih zadevnega blaga ali storitev.
The Office normally examines the most salient and habitually relevant factors relating to likelihood of confusion and establishes their degrees: 
Urad navadno prouči dejavnike, ki najbolj izstopajo in so običajno najpomembnejši pri presojanju verjetnosti zmede, ter določi njihove stopnje:
similarity of the goods and services; 
podobnost blaga in storitev;
the relevant public and the level of attention; 
upoštevna javnost in stopnja pozornosti;
similarity of the signs taking into account their distinctive and dominant elements; 
podobnost znakov ob upoštevanju njihovih razlikovalnih in prevladujočih elementov;
the distinctiveness of the earlier mark. 
razlikovalni učinek prejšnje znamke.
In the last section of a decision containing the global assessment, those factors are weighed up. 
Ti dejavniki se pretehtajo v zadnjem razdelku odločbe, ki vsebuje celovito presojo.
However, the global assessment can weigh up many other factors that are relevant to deciding on likelihood of confusion (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 6, Other Factors). 
Vendar se lahko v celoviti presoji pretehtajo številni drugi dejavniki, ki so pomembni za odločitev glede verjetnosti zmede (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 6: Drugi dejavniki).
2 Interdependence Principle 
Načelo soodvisnosti
The Court has set out the essential principle that evaluating likelihood of confusion implies some interdependence between the relevant factors and, in particular, between the previously established findings on the degree of similarity between the marks and that between the goods or services. 
Sodišče je določilo osnovno načelo, da se pri ugotavljanju verjetnosti zmede upošteva neka stopnja soodvisnosti med upoštevnimi dejavniki, zlasti pri prejšnjih ugotovitvah o stopnji podobnosti med znamkami ter med blagom ali storitvami.
Therefore, a lesser degree of similarity between goods and services may be offset by a greater degree of similarity between the marks and vice versa (29/09/1998, C39/97, Canon, EU:C:1998:442, § 17). 
Tako lahko majhna podobnost med blagom in storitvami odtehta večjo podobnost med znamkami in obratno (29/09/1998, C39/97, Canon, EU:C:1998:442, § 17).
This principle of interdependence is crucial to the analysis of likelihood of confusion. 
To načelo soodvisnosti je bistveno za analizo verjetnosti zmede.
The interdependence of those factors is expressly referred to in recital 8 in the Preamble to the EUTMR, according to which the concept of similarity is to be interpreted in relation to the likelihood of confusion, the assessment of which depends on numerous elements and, in particular, on the recognition of the mark on the market, the association that can be made with the used or registered sign, the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign and that between the goods or services identified (10/09/2008, T325/06, Capio, EU:T:2008:338, § 72 and case-law cited). 
Soodvisnost med navedenimi dejavniki je izrecno navedena v uvodni izjavi 8 v preambuli Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, v skladu s katero je treba pojem podobnosti razlagati v zvezi z verjetnostjo zmede, ugotavljanje katere je odvisno od številnih elementov, zlasti od prepoznavnosti blagovne znamke na trgu, povezovanja, ki ga lahko povzroči uporabljen ali registriran znak, stopnje podobnosti med znamko in znakom ter med označenim blagom in storitvami (10/09/2008, T325/06, Capio, EU:T:2008:338, § 72 in navedena sodna praksa).
The requirement for a global assessment and the principle of interdependence means that where there is at least some degree of similarity between the signs and the relevant goods/services, there will be an assessment of likelihood of confusion involving an iterative process that weighs up all the relevant factors. 
Zahteva po celoviti presoji in načelo soodvisnosti pomenita, da kadar obstaja vsaj neka stopnja podobnosti med znaki in zadevnim blagom/storitvami, se bo presojala verjetnost zmede, ki vključuje iterativni postopek, pri katerem se presoja pomen vseh upoštevnih dejavnikov.
This process takes place in the global assessment section. 
Ta postopek se izvaja v okviru razdelka Celovita presoja.
In practice, this means that the Office will weigh up, inter alia, the degree of similarity between the goods and services and the degree of attention paid by the relevant public to those goods and services, the degree of similarity between the signs, and whether the impression produced by any one of the levels of comparison (visual/aural/conceptual) is more important, and the distinctiveness of the earlier mark. 
V praksi to pomeni, da bo Urad med drugim pretehtal stopnjo podobnosti med blagom in storitvami ter stopnjo pozornosti, ki jo upoštevna javnost nameni navedenemu blagu in storitvam, stopnjo podobnosti med znaki, ali je pomembnejši vtis, ustvarjen na kateri koli stopnji primerjave (vizualni/zvočni/pojmovni), ter razlikovalni učinek prejšnje znamke.
The outcome depends on the particularities of each case, but as a rule of thumb it can be said that when there is an average degree of similarity between the signs and between the goods or services, the degree of attention of the relevant public is average and the earlier trade mark has a normal distinctiveness, there will be a likelihood of confusion. 
Rezultat je odvisen od posebnosti vsakega primera, vendar je mogoče na splošno reči, da bo verjetnost zmede obstajala pri povprečni stopnji podobnosti med znaki ter med blagom ali storitvami, povprečni stopnji pozornosti upoštevne javnosti in običajnem razlikovalnem učinku prejšnje blagovne znamke.
However, the lower the degree of one factor, the higher the degree of other factors must be in order to find a likelihood of confusion (bearing in mind that the likelihood of confusion is inversely affected by an increased degree of attention of the relevant public). 
A nižja ko je stopnja enega dejavnika, višja mora biti stopnja drugih dejavnikov, da bi ugotovili verjetnost zmede (ob upoštevanju, da na verjetnost zmede obratno sorazmerno vpliva povečana stopnja pozornosti upoštevne javnosti).
Therefore, on the basis of an average degree of distinctiveness of the earlier mark and an average degree of attentiveness of the public, the finding of a likelihood of confusion may be justified when the signs are identical or highly similar, despite a low degree of similarity between the goods and/or services. 
Zato se na podlagi povprečne stopnje razlikovalnega učinka prejšnje znamke in povprečne stopnje pozornosti javnosti ugotovitev verjetnosti zmede lahko upraviči, kadar so znaki enaki ali zelo podobni, kljub nizki stopnji podobnosti med blagom in/ali storitvami.
However, such a finding is more difficult on the basis of a limited distinctiveness of the earlier mark and/or when the level of attention of the public is higher than average. 
Vendar je takšna ugotovitev težja na podlagi omejenega razlikovalnega učinka prejšnje znamke in/ali kadar je stopnja pozornosti javnosti višja od povprečja.
Where the degrees of similarity of the marks are different in each aspect of comparison (visual, phonetic and conceptual), it has to be taken into account whether one aspect is more important for the public when purchasing the goods. 
Kadar so stopnje podobnosti znamk drugačne pri vsakem vidiku primerjave (vizualnem, zvočnem in pojmovnem), je treba upoštevati, ali je eden od vidikov pomembnejši za javnost pri nakupu blaga.
Moreover, the factors to be taken into account and their importance in the global assessment will vary according to the particular circumstances. 
Poleg tega se bodo dejavniki, ki jih je treba upoštevati, in njihov pomen pri celoviti presoji, razlikovali glede na določene okoliščine.
For example, in clear-cut cases where the goods/services and the signs are highly similar or identical, the Office may find a likelihood of confusion without assessing all factors - such as enhanced distinctiveness, family of marks, etc. 
Urad lahko na primer v nedvoumnih primerih, v katerih so blago/storitve in znaki zelo podobni ali enaki, ugotovi verjetnost zmede, ne da bi proučil vse dejavnike, na primer povečan razlikovalni učinek, družina znamk itd.
Importantly, it is not possible to set out in the abstract whether one factor carries more weight than another, because these factors will have varying degrees of relative importance depending on the circumstances. 
Pomembno je, da ni mogoče teoretično določiti, ali je kateri dejavnik pomembnejši od drugega, ker bo njihov pomen relativen in odvisen od okoliščin.
For instance, the degree of visual similarity may weigh more heavily in connection with goods that are usually examined visually, whilst the degree of aural similarity may be more relevant to goods normally ordered orally (see paragraph 4 below). 
Stopnja vizualne podobnosti je lahko na primer pomembnejša v povezavi z blagom, ki ga navadno zaznavamo vizualno, zvočna podobnost pa je lahko pomembnejša pri blagu, ki se naroča ustno (glej odstavek 4 v nadaljevanju).
3 Imperfect Recollection 
Nepopoln priklic v spomin
Although the average consumer of the category of products concerned is deemed to be reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, account is taken of the fact that the average consumer only rarely has the chance to make a direct comparison between the different marks and must place trust in the imperfect picture of them that he or she has kept in mind. 
Čeprav se šteje, da je povprečni potrošnik razreda zadevnih proizvodov razmeroma dobro obveščen ter razumno pozoren in preudaren, je treba upoštevati, da lahko redko neposredno primerja različne znamke in da se mora zanesti na nepopolno podobo znamk, ki si jih je zapomnil.
It should also be borne in mind that the average consumer's level of attention is likely to vary according to the category of goods or services in question (22/06/1999, C342/97, Lloyd Schuhfabrik, EU:C:1999:323, § 26). 
Poleg tega je treba upoštevati, da se lahko stopnja pozornosti povprečnega potrošnika spreminja glede na razred zadevnega blaga ali storitev (22/06/1999, C342/97, Lloyd Schuhfabrik, EU:C:1999:323, § 26).
Even consumers with a high level of attention need to rely on their imperfect recollection of trade marks (21/11/2013, T443/12, ancotel, EU:T:2013:605, § 54). 
Celo potrošniki z visoko stopnjo pozornosti se morajo zanesti na svoj nepopoln priklic v spomin na blagovne znamke (21/11/2013, T443/12, ancotel, EU:T:2013:605, § 54).
4 Impact of the Method of Purchase of Goods and Services 
Učinek načina kupovanja blaga in storitev
The Court has stated that, when evaluating the importance attached to the degree of visual, aural and conceptual similarity between the signs, it is appropriate to take into account the category of goods or services in question and the way they are marketed (22/09/1999, C342/97, Lloyd Schuhfabrik, EU:C:1999:323, § 27). 
Sodišče je navedlo, da je treba pri oceni, kako pomembna je stopnja vizualne, zvočne in pomenske podobnosti med znaki, upoštevati razred zadevnega blaga ali storitev in način njihovega trženja (22/09/1999, C342/97, Lloyd Schuhfabrik, EU:C:1999:323, § 27).
The category of goods and services involved may increase the importance of one of the different aspects of similarity between signs (visual, phonetic and conceptual) because of how goods and services are ordered and/or purchased. 
Zaradi razreda vključenega blaga in storitev se lahko poveča pomen enega od različnih vidikov podobnosti med znaki (vizualnega, zvočnega in pojmovnega) zaradi načina naročanja blaga in storitev in/ali kupovanja.
An aural or conceptual comparison between signs may be less important in the case of goods and services that are usually examined visually or may be tried on before being bought. 
Zvočna ali pojmovna primerjava med znaki je lahko manj pomembna pri blagu in storitvah, ki jih navadno vizualno zaznavamo ali jih pred nakupom lahko pomerimo.
In such cases, the visual impression of signs counts more in the assessment of likelihood of confusion. 
V takšnih primerih je pri presoji verjetnosti zmede pomembnejši vizualni vtis znakov.
However, it is important to emphasise that, as with all of the factors that are relevant to likelihood of confusion, the factors are interlinked and each set of circumstances must be examined on a case-by-case basis. 
Treba pa je poudariti, da so tudi ti dejavniki, tako kot drugi upoštevni dejavniki za verjetnost zmede, medsebojno povezani in je treba vsak sklop okoliščin proučiti za vsak primer posebej.
This means that no general rule should be applied to broad categories of goods or services. 
To pomeni, da se za širše kategorije blaga ali storitev ne uporablja nobeno splošno pravilo.
4.1 Visual similarity 
Vizualna podobnost
A good example of where visual similarity can play a greater - but not an exclusive - role in the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion is clothing. 
Dober primer, pri katerem ima lahko vizualna podobnost večjo, vendar ne izključno vlogo pri celoviti presoji verjetnosti zmede so oblačila.
Generally, in clothing shops, customers can either choose the clothes they wish to buy themselves or be assisted by the sales staff. 
Na splošno si v trgovinah z oblačili stranke lahko same izberejo oblačila, ki jih želijo kupiti, ali jim pomagajo prodajalci.
Whilst oral communication in respect of the product and the trade mark is not excluded, the choice of the item of clothing is generally made visually. 
Čeprav ustna komunikacija o izdelku in blagovni znamki ni izključena, se oblačila navadno izbirajo vizualno.
Therefore, visual perception of the marks in question will generally take place prior to purchase. 
Tako bo pred nakupom na splošno značilno vizualno zaznavanje zadevnih znamk.
Accordingly, the visual aspect plays a greater role in the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion (14/10/2003, T292/01, Bass, EU:T:2003:264, § 55; 06/10/2004, T117/03-T119/03 & T171/03, NL, EU:T:2004:293, § 50; 18/05/2011, T502/07, McKenzie, EU:T:2011:223, § 50; 24/01/2012, T593/10, B, EU:T:2012:25, § 47). 
V skladu s tem ima vizualni vidik večjo vlogo v celoviti presoji verjetnosti zmede (14/10/2003, T292/01, Bass, EU:T:2003:264, § 55; 06/10/2004, T117/03-T119/03 in T171/03, NL, EU:T:2004:293, § 50; 18/05/2011, T502/07, McKenzie, EU:T:2011:223, § 50; 24/01/2012, T593/10, B, EU:T:2012:25, § 47).
These considerations played a role in finding no likelihood of confusion between the marks below for, inter alia, certain goods in Class 25. 
Ti premisleki so bili pomembni pri odločitvi, da pri spodnjih znamkah za nekatero blago iz razreda 25 ni verjetnosti zmede.
The same considerations were central to a finding of likelihood of confusion in the following cases also for, inter alia, certain goods in Class 25. 
Isti premisleki so bili bistvenega pomena za ugotovitev verjetnosti zmede v naslednjih primerih in med drugim tudi za nekatere vrste blaga iz razreda 25.
However, granting preferential consideration to the visual perception does not mean that identical verbal elements can be overlooked due to the presence of striking figurative elements, as can be seen in the case below, where likelihood of confusion was found for goods in Class 25. 
Vendar prednostno upoštevanje vizualnega zaznavanja ne pomeni, da je mogoče zaradi vpadljivih figurativnih elementov prezreti enake besedne elemente, kot je prikazano v primerih v nadaljevanju, v katerih je bila ugotovljena verjetnost zmede za blago iz razreda 25.
In a similar way, the visual impression for marks covering video games has also been held to be particularly relevant because these goods are normally purchased after a comprehensive examination of their respective specifications and technical characteristics, firstly upon the basis of information that appears in specialist catalogues or on the internet, and then at the point of sale. 
Podobno je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vizualni vtis zlasti pomemben pri znamkah, ki zajemajo video igre, ker se to blago navadno kupi po izčrpnem pregledu ustreznih specifikacij in tehničnih značilnosti, najprej na podlagi informacij v strokovnih katalogih ali na spletu in nato na prodajnih mestih.
For these reasons, the visual differences were key to the finding of no likelihood of confusion below (08/09/2011, T525/09, Metronia, EU:T:2011:437, § 38-47). 
Zato so bile vizualne razlike ključne za ugotovitev, da pri blagovnih znamkah v nadaljevanju ni verjetnosti zmede (08/09/2011, T525/09, Metronia, EU:T:2011:437, § 38-47).
The visual similarity between signs may also have an increased importance where the goods are ordinary consumer products (e.g. goods in Classes 29 and 30) that are most commonly purchased in supermarkets or establishments where goods are arranged on shelves and where consumers are guided more by the visual impact of the mark they are looking for. 
Vizualna podobnost med znaki je lahko pomembnejša pri običajnih potrošniških proizvodih (na primer pri blagu iz razredov 29 in 30), ki se najpogosteje kupuje v samopostrežnih veleblagovnicah ali prodajalnah, v katerih je blago zloženo na police in kjer potrošnike usmerja bolj vizualni učinek znamke, ki jo iščejo.
Consequently, for such goods the visual differences were central to a finding of no likelihood of confusion in the United Kingdom between the marks below. 
Zato so bile za takšno blago vizualne razlike ključne za ugotovitev, da v Združenem kraljestvu med znamkami v nadaljevanju ni verjetnosti zmede:
However, the broad principle above does not mean that for goods that are normally purchased visually, the phonetic impression can be overlooked. 
Vendar zgornje splošno načelo ne pomeni, da se lahko pri blagu, ki se navadno kupuje vizualno, prezre zvočni vtis.
This latter point was highlighted in a case involving the marks below where the General Court, confirming the finding of a likelihood of confusion, held that although computers and computer accessories are sold to consumers ‘as seen' on shelves in self-service areas, the phonetic identity between the marks at issue was, in this case, at least as important as their visual similarity because an oral discussion of the characteristics of the goods and their mark is also likely to take place at the time of purchase. 
To je bilo poudarjeno v zadevi, ki je vključevala znamki v nadaljevanju in v kateri je Splošno sodišče, ki je potrdilo ugotovitev verjetnosti zmede, razsodilo, da se računalniki in računalniški pripomočki potrošnikom prodajajo na policah samopostrežnih trgovin, „kot jih vidijo“, zvočna enakost med zadevnima znamkama v tej zadevi pa je bila vsaj tako pomembna kot njuna vizualna enakost, saj je verjetno, da so se ob nakupu pogovarjali o značilnostih blaga in njegovi znamki.
Furthermore, those goods could be advertised orally, on radio or by other consumers. 
Poleg tega se lahko navedeno blago oglašuje ustno, po radiu ali o njem govorijo drugi potrošniki.
4.2 Aural similarity 
Zvočna podobnost
In contrast to the cases above, where visual similarity played a stronger role, similarity on the phonetic level may have more weight than similarity on the visual level when the goods at issue are traditionally ordered orally. 
V nasprotju z zgornjimi primeri, pri katerih je bila pomembnejša vizualna podobnost, je lahko zvočna podobnost pomembnejša od vizualne podobnosti, če se zadevno blago navadno naroča ustno.
This consideration came into play in the finding of likelihood of confusion in the case below, which dealt with vehicle rental and associated services, which are recommended and chosen orally in a significant number of cases. 
Ta vidik je imel vlogo pri ugotovitvi verjetnosti zmede v zadevi v nadaljevanju, ki je obravnavala najem vozil in povezane storitve, ki se v velikem številu primerov priporočijo in izberejo ustno.
Where goods are ordered orally, the phonetic perception of the sign may also be influenced by factors such as the likely presence of various other sounds perceived by the recipient of the order at the same time. 
Kadar se blago naroča ustno, lahko na zvočno zaznavanje znaka vplivajo tudi drugi dejavniki, kot so razni drugi zvoki, ki jih obenem zaznava prevzemnik naročila.
Such considerations are relevant where the goods in question are normally ordered at sales points with an increased noise factor, such as bars or nightclubs. 
Takšni razmisleki so pomembni, kadar se zadevno blago navadno naroča na hrupnejših prodajnih mestih, kot so bari ali nočni klubi.
In such cases, attaching particular importance to the phonetic similarity between the signs at issue may be appropriate. 
V teh primerih bi bilo primerno nameniti posebno pozornost zvočni podobnosti med zadevnima znakoma.
These considerations came into play in the finding of likelihood of confusion between the marks below for certain goods in Class 33 (15/01/2003, T99/01, Mystery, EU:T:2003:7, § 48). 
Ti razmisleki so se pojavili pri ugotovitvi o verjetnosti zmede med znamkama v nadaljevanju za posamezno blago iz razreda 33 (15/01/2003, T99/01, Mystery, EU:T:2003:7, § 48).
Similarly, a particular method or customary way of ordering goods may mean increased importance being attributed to the phonetic similarity between the signs. 
Podobno bi lahko posebni ali običajni način naročanja blaga pomenil, da se pripisuje večji pomen zvočni podobnosti med znaki.
For instance, the General Court has held that in the wines sector, consumers usually describe and recognise wine by reference to the verbal element that identifies it, in particular in bars and restaurants, in which wines are ordered orally after their names have been seen on the wine list (23/11/2010, T35/08, Artesa Napa Valley, EU:T:2010:476, § 62; 13/07/2005, T40/03, Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, § 56; 12/03/2008, T332/04, Coto d'Arcis, EU:T:2008:69, § 38). 
Splošno sodišče je na primer razsodilo, da so v vinskem sektorju potrošniki navajeni določiti in prepoznati vino glede na besedni element, ki ga označuje, zlasti v barih ali restavracijah, kjer se vino naroča ustno, potem ko so videli ime na vinski karti (23/11/2010, T35/08, Artesa Napa Valley, EU:T:2010:476, § 62; 13/07/2005, T40/03, Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, § 56; 12/03/2008, T332/04, Coto d'Arcis, EU:T:2008:69, § 38).
Accordingly, in such cases, it may be appropriate to attach particular importance to the phonetic similarity between the signs at issue. 
Zato bi bilo v takšnih primerih primerno posebno pozornost nameniti zvočni podobnosti med zadevnimi znaki.
These considerations came into play in the finding of likelihood of confusion between the marks below for wine despite their considerable visual differences. 
Ti razmisleki so se pojavili pri ugotovitvi verjetnosti zmede med vinskimi znamkami v nadaljevanju kljub velikim vizualnim razlikam med njimi.
Nevertheless, the broad principle above does not mean that the visual impression can be overlooked for goods normally purchased orally. 
Vendar zgornje splošno načelo ne pomeni, da se lahko pri blagu, ki se navadno kupuje ustno, prezre vizualni vtis.