natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the earlier mark is an EUTM, no representation is requested since it is available in the Office's database. 
Če vložnik ugovora pomanjkljivosti ne odpravi v določenem dvomesečnem roku, bo prejšnja pravica zavržena kot nedopustna.
If the mark is a word mark, an indication of the word is sufficient to consider that a proper representation of the mark has been submitted. 
Če je prejšnja znamka blagovna znamka EU, se prikaz ne zahteva, saj je na voljo v podatkovni zbirki Urada.
For the same purpose, if the mark is figurative, 3D, other mark, etc., the representation of the mark as applied for or registered must be filed. 
Če je znamka besedna znamka, zadostuje navedba besede, da se šteje, da je bil predložen ustrezen prikaz znamke.
When the trade mark is in colour, at least a representation of the mark in colour must be submitted. 
Če je za enake namene znamka figurativna, tridimenzionalna, druga znamka itd., je treba vložiti prikaz znamke, kot je bila prijavljena ali registrirana.
Therefore, when an indication in this regard is contained in the submitted documents without it being accompanied by a representation of the mark in colour (i.e. no graphical representation of the mark or a representation of the mark in black and white is filed), the Office will notify this deficiency. 
Če predloženi dokumenti vsebujejo navedbo v zvezi s tem, ne da bi ji bil priložen barvni prikaz znamke (tj. predložen ni niti grafični niti črno-beli prikaz znamke), bo Urad vložnika ugovora zato uradno obvestil o tej pomanjkljivosti.
If the opponent does not comply within the 2-month time limit given, the earlier right will be rejected as inadmissible. 
Če vložnik ugovora pomanjkljivosti ne odpravi v določenem dvomesečnem roku, bo prejšnja pravica zavržena kot nedopustna.
A colour representation of the mark is not compulsory if the national mark was not published (for technical reasons) in colour, as is the practice, for example, in Cyprus and Latvia. 
Barvni prikaz znamke ni obvezen, če nacionalna znamka (iz tehničnih razlogov) ni bila objavljena v barvah, kot velja na primer na Cipru in v Latviji.
In these cases the Office neither asks for a colour representation nor requests the opponent to file a translation of the colour indications submitted in the original language. 
V takšnih primerih Urad od vložnika ugovora ne zahteva niti barvnega prikaza niti prevoda navedb barv, predloženih v izvirnem jeziku.
The following countries have either always published in colour or have done so since the date indicated: 
Naslednje države ali že od nekdaj objavljajo v barvah ali to počnejo od navedenega datuma:
Bulgaria 
Bolgarija
Czech Republic (1999) 
Češka (1999)
Estonia (2003) 
Estonija (2003)
Ireland (2003) 
Irska (2003)
Greece (2007) 
Grčija (2007)
Spain (as of 31/07/2002) 
Španija (od 31. julija 2002)
France (1992) 
Francija (1992)
Croatia (2009) 
Hrvaška (2009)
Lithuania (as of July 2009) 
Litva (od julija 2009)
Austria 
Avstrija
Poland (2003) 
Poljska (2003)
Portugal (2006) 
Portugalska (2006)
Romania 
Romunija
Slovenia (1992) 
Slovenija (1992)
Slovakia (2008) 
Slovaška (2008)
Finland (2005) 
Finska (2005)
United Kingdom (2004). 
Združeno kraljestvo (2004)
International marks have been published in colour since 1989. 
Mednarodne znamke se v barvah objavljajo od leta 1989.
If the representation on file is not clear, the Office may ask for a clearer one. 
Če prikaz v spisu ni jasen, lahko Urad zahteva jasnejši prikaz.
If the representation that is received is incomplete or illegible and the request to provide a clear one is not complied with, the representation will be deemed not to have been received and the right will be rejected as inadmissible 
Če je prejeti prikaz nepopoln ali neberljiv in vložnik ugovora ne izpolni zahteve po predložitvi jasnejšega prikaza, se bo štelo, da prikaz ni bil prejet, pravica pa bo zavržena kot nedopustna.
2.4.2.3 Goods and services 
Blago in storitve
Article 2(2)(g) and Article 5(5) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2)(g) in člen 5(5) Delegirane uredbe
Article 2(2)(g) EUTMDR stipulates that the notice of opposition must contain an indication of the goods and services on which the opposition is based in the language of the proceedings for each of the grounds. 
Člen 2(2)(g) Delegirane uredbe določa, da mora ugovor vsebovati navedbo blaga in storitev, na katerih temelji ugovor, in sicer v jeziku postopka za vsakega od razlogov.
This applies to all types of earlier rights. 
To velja za vse vrste prejšnjih pravic.
The opposition can be based on all the goods and services for which the earlier mark is registered or applied for, or on only some of the goods and services. 
Ugovor lahko temelji na vsem blagu in storitvah, za katere je prejšnja znamka registrirana ali prijavljena, ali samo na nekaterem blagu in storitvah.
These goods and services must be listed in the language of the proceedings. 
To blago in storitve morajo biti navedeni v jeziku postopka.
If the goods and services on which the opposition is based are fewer than the goods and services for which the mark is registered, the goods and services on which the opposition is not based need not be indicated, as they are irrelevant to the proceedings. 
Če je blaga in storitev, na katerih temelji ugovor, manj kot blaga in storitev, za katere je znamka registrirana, blaga in storitev, na katerih ne temelji ugovor, ni treba navesti, ker niso pomembni za postopek.
An indication of the class number(s) or a reference to ‘all goods and services for which the earlier mark is registered' is accepted as sufficient indication of the goods and services of the earlier rights on which the opposition is based, provided that a registration certificate or extract from an official source, containing the list of goods and services covered by that mark, is attached (the registration certificate or extract must either be in the language of the proceedings or be translated into the language of the proceedings or make use of national or INID codes so as to clearly identify the relevant class number(s)). 
Navedba številke razreda ali številk razredov ali sklicevanje na „vse blago in storitve, za katere je registrirana prejšnja znamka“ je priznano kot zadostna navedba blaga in storitev prejšnjih pravic, na katerih temelji ugovor, če je priloženo potrdilo o registraciji ali izpisek iz uradnega vira, ki vsebuje seznam blaga in storitev, zajetih z navedeno znamko (potrdilo o registraciji ali izpisek mora biti bodisi v jeziku postopka bodisi preveden v jezik postopka ali pa morajo biti uporabljene nacionalne kode ali kode INID, da se jasno opredeli(-jo) ustrezna(-e) številka(-e) razreda(-ov)).
If an indication such as ‘the opposition is based on all the goods in Class 9' is used and no certificate in the language of the proceedings is attached, the Office will require a specification of the goods in the language of the proceedings. 
Če je uporabljena navedba, kot je „ugovor temelji na vsem blagu iz razreda 9“, in potrdilo ni priloženo v jeziku postopka, bo Urad zahteval podrobno opredelitev blaga v jeziku postopka.
An indication of this type is only acceptable when the opponent replies that it owns a registration with a description that mentions that the sign is registered for ‘all goods in Class 9'. 
Tovrstna navedba je sprejemljiva samo, če vložnik ugovora odgovori, da je imetnik registracije z opisom, v katerem je navedeno, da je znak registriran za vse blago iz razreda 9.
Additionally, where the opponent indicates in the opposition form that the opposition is based on ‘all goods and services for which the earlier right is registered' but then lists only ‘part' of these goods and services (when compared with the registration certificate or relevant official extract attached to the opposition form) the Office will, in order to overcome the contradictory information contained in the notice of opposition, assume that the opposition is based on ‘all goods and services for which the earlier right is registered'. 
Poleg tega bo Urad, če vložnik ugovora na obrazcu za ugovor navede, da ugovor temelji na „vsem blagu in storitvah, za katere je registrirana prejšnja pravica“, vendar nato navede samo del tega blaga in storitev (v primerjavi s potrdilom o registraciji ali ustreznim uradnim izpiskom, priloženim obrazcu za ugovor), zaradi razjasnitve nasprotujočih si informacij v ugovoru domneval, da ugovor temelji na „vsem blagu in storitvah, za katere je registrirana prejšnja pravica“.
Even if the opponent has not indicated, or has not clearly indicated, on which goods and/or services it bases its opposition, it is sufficient if a registration certificate in the language of the proceedings is attached; it is then assumed that the opposition is based on the goods and services that appear in the certificate. 
Tudi če vložnik ugovora ni navedel ali ni jasno navedel, na katerem blagu in/ali storitvah temelji njegov ugovor, zadostuje že, če je priloženo potrdilo o registraciji v jeziku postopka; v takem primeru se domneva, da ugovor temelji na blagu in storitvah, ki so navedeni v potrdilu.
However, if the certificate is in a language other than the language of the proceedings or if no certificate is attached, the deficiency must be notified. 
Vendar če je potrdilo v jeziku, ki ni jezik postopka, ali če ni priloženo nobeno potrdilo, je treba sporočiti pomanjkljivost.
If an opposition is based on ‘all identical/similar goods and services', clarification must be requested since this wording is not sufficiently clear to identify the basis of the opposition. 
Če ugovor temelji na vsem enakem/podobnem blagu in storitvah, je treba zahtevati pojasnilo, saj to besedilo ni dovolj jasno za opredelitev podlage ugovora.
For oppositions based on earlier non-registered trade marks or rights, the opponent must indicate the commercial activities in which they are used. 
Vložnik ugovora mora pri ugovorih, ki temeljijo na prejšnjih neregistriranih blagovnih znamkah ali pravicah, navesti gospodarske dejavnosti, v katerih se uporabljajo.
Specific aspects: oppositions filed against international registrations designating the EU 
Posebni vidiki: ugovori, vloženi zoper mednarodne registracije, v katerih je imenovana EU
For admissibility purposes, with regard to oppositions filed against international registrations designating the EU, an indication of the class number(s) only in the notice of opposition is not sufficient to identify the goods and services on which the opposition is based. 
V zvezi z dopustnostjo velja, da pri ugovorih, vloženih zoper mednarodne registracije, v katerih je imenovana EU, navedba samo številke razreda ali več številk razredov v ugovoru ne zadostuje za opredelitev blaga in storitev, na katerih temelji ugovor.
If the opposition is based on all or part of the goods and services for which the earlier mark(s) is/are registered/applied for, these goods and services need to be listed in the language of the opposition proceedings. 
Če ugovor temelji na vsem blagu in storitvah ali delu blaga in storitev, za katere je prejšnja znamka ali več takih znamk registriranih/prijavljenih, morajo biti to blago in storitve navedeni v jeziku postopka ugovora.
This list must include all the goods or services covered by that mark or at least the relevant goods or services on which the opposition is based. 
Ta seznam mora vključevati vse blago ali storitve, zajete z navedeno znamko, ali vsaj zadevno blago ali storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor.
2.4.2.4 Earlier mark with a reputation: territorial scope of reputation 
Prejšnja znamka z ugledom: obseg ugleda
When the opponent invokes Article 8(5) EUTMR on the basis of a national trade mark, the Office assumes that reputation is claimed for the territory in relation to which the earlier national mark has protection. 
Če se vložnik ugovora sklicuje na člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU na podlagi nacionalne blagovne znamke, Urad domneva, da se ugled uveljavlja za ozemlje, v zvezi s katerim je prejšnja nacionalna znamka zaščitena.
When the opponent invokes Article 8(5) EUTMR on the basis of an international trade mark, the opponent will have to identify the territories for which it claims reputation for its mark. 
Če se vložnik ugovora sklicuje na člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU na podlagi mednarodne blagovne znamke, bo moral opredeliti ozemlja, za katera uveljavlja ugled svoje znamke.
In the absence of that indication, the Office assumes that reputation is claimed for all the territories in relation to which the earlier mark has protection. 
Če navedene navedbe ni, Urad domneva, da se ugled uveljavlja za vsa ozemlja, v zvezi s katerimi je prejšnja znamka zaščitena.
When the earlier mark is an EUTM, no indication is requested since it is considered that the reputation is claimed for the EU. 
Če je prejšnja znamka blagovna znamka EU, se navedba ne zahteva, saj se šteje, da se ugled uveljavlja za EU.
2.4.2.5 Identification of the opponent 
Opredelitev vložnika ugovora
Article 46(1) EUTMR 
Člen 46(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 2(2)(h)(i) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2)(h)(i) Delegirane uredbe
The opponent can either be a natural or a legal person. 
Vložnik ugovora je lahko fizična ali pravna oseba.
In order to be able to identify the opponent, there must be an indication of its name and address. 
Za opredelitev vložnika ugovora morata biti navedena njegovo ime in naslov.
Until now there have been no oppositions where the opponent was not identified. 
Do zdaj ni bilo ugovorov, v katerih vložnik ugovora ni bil opredeljen.
If only the name of the opponent and, for example, a fax number is indicated, the opponent must be asked to give the particulars of its address. 
Če sta navedena samo ime vložnika ugovora in na primer številka telefaksa, je treba vložnika ugovora pozvati, naj navede podatke o svojem naslovu.
When examining whether the opponent is clearly identified, attention should be given to the nature of the opponent, that is to say whether it is a natural or legal person. 
Pri proučitvi, ali je vložnik ugovora jasno opredeljen, je treba pozornost nameniti vrsti vložnika ugovora, tj. ali gre za fizično ali pravno osebo.
Entitlement 
Upravičenost
Article 2(2)(h)(i) and (iii) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2)(h)(i) in (iii) Delegirane uredbe
It is assumed that the opponent claims to be the owner of the earlier right, unless otherwise stated. 
Domneva se, da vložnik ugovora trdi, da je imetnik prejšnje pravice, razen če ni navedeno drugače.
Only if the opponent acts in the capacity of an authorised licensee or a person authorised under national law, does it have to make a statement to that effect, and it has to specify the basis on which it is so entitled or authorised. 
Samo če vložnik ugovora deluje kot pooblaščeni pridobitelj licence ali oseba, pooblaščena na podlagi nacionalnega prava, mora v zvezi s tem podati izjavo in opredeliti podlago za to njegovo pravico ali pooblastilo.
If those details are not given, a deficiency must be notified. 
Če ti podatki niso navedeni, je treba vložnika ugovora uradno obvestiti o pomanjkljivosti.
In accordance with Article 2(2)(h)(iii) EUTMDR an opponent who acts as a licensee or authorised person has to indicate its name and address in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) EUTMIR. 
V skladu s členom 2(2)(h)(iii) Delegirane uredbe mora vložnik ugovora, ki deluje kot pridobitelj licence ali pooblaščena oseba, navesti svoje ime in naslov v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe.
If the notice of opposition is based on the grounds of Article 8(1) or (5) EUTMR and thus on trade mark registrations or applications, the notice of opposition may be filed by the owner of these registrations or applications, or by the licensees, provided they are authorised by the owner. 
Če ugovor temelji na razlogih iz člena 8(1) ali (5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, torej na registracijah ali prijavah blagovnih znamk, lahko ugovor vloži imetnik teh registracij ali prijav ali pridobitelji licence, če jih pooblasti imetnik.
If the notice of opposition is based on the grounds of Article 8(3) EUTMR (an agent trade mark), it may be filed by the owner of that trade mark. 
Če ugovor temelji na razlogih iz člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (blagovna znamka posrednika), ga lahko vloži imetnik navedene blagovne znamke.
If the notice of opposition is based on the grounds of Article 8(4) EUTMR (earlier marks or signs), it may be filed by the owner of that earlier mark or sign and by persons authorised under the relevant national law to exercise the rights to the earlier mark or sign. 
Če ugovor temelji na razlogih iz člena 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (prejšnje znamke ali znaki), ga lahko vloži imetnik te prejšnje znamke ali znaka ali osebe, ki so na podlagi zadevnega nacionalnega prava pooblaščene za uveljavljanje pravic iz prejšnje znamke ali znaka.
If the notice of opposition is based on the grounds of Article 8(6) EUTMR, it may be filed by any person authorised under the relevant EU legislation or national law to exercise the rights to the earlier protected designation of origin or geographic indication. 
Če ugovor temelji na razlogih iz člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ga lahko vloži vsaka oseba, ki je na podlagi zadevne zakonodaje EU ali nacionalnega prava pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic iz prejšnje zaščitene označbe porekla ali geografske označbe.
As long as the opponent claims to own a right or registration in one of the Member States of the European Union, it is entitled to file an opposition, irrespective of country of origin. 
Če vložnik ugovora trdi, da je imetnik pravice ali registracije v eni od držav članic Evropske unije, ima pravico vložiti ugovor ne glede na državo izvora.
Change of owner (transfer of earlier mark) before the opposition is filed 
Sprememba imetnika (prenos prejšnje znamke) pred vložitvijo ugovora
Where the earlier mark has been transferred before the opposition is filed, a distinction has to be made between oppositions based on an earlier EUTM and oppositions based on national trade mark registrations (or applications). 
Če je bila prejšnja znamka prenesena pred vložitvijo ugovora, je treba razlikovati med ugovori, ki temeljijo na prejšnji blagovni znamki EU, in tistimi, ki temeljijo na registracijah (ali prijavah) nacionalne blagovne znamke.
Oppositions based on an earlier EUTM 
Ugovori, ki temeljijo na prejšnji blagovni znamki EU
An opposition based on European Union registrations or applications may be entered by the successor in title of an EUTM only if the conditions set out in Article 20(12) EUTMR are met, namely, only if the opponent has submitted a request for the registration of the transfer when the opposition is filed. 
Ugovor, ki temelji na registracijah ali prijavah blagovne znamke Evropske unije, lahko pravni naslednik blagovne znamke EU vloži samo, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 20(12) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, tj. samo če je vložnik ugovora ob vložitvi ugovora predložil prijavo za registracijo prenosa.
According to Article 20(12) EUTMR, where there are time limits to be observed vis-à-vis the Office, the successor in title may make the corresponding statements to the Office once the request for registration of the transfer has been received by the Office. 
Člen 20(12) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določa, da če je treba upoštevati roke Urada, lahko pravni naslednik poda ustrezne izjave Uradu, ko Urad prejme prijavo za registracijo prenosa.
It is up to the opponent to provide this information, and it will not be checked by the Office during the admissibility check. 
Te informacije mora zagotoviti vložnik ugovora, Urad pa jih med preizkusom dopustnosti ne bo preverjal.
However, if the opponent mentions in the explanation of its opposition that it is the new owner (or uses similar terms), the Office must request the opponent to indicate the date the request for registration of the transfer was sent to or received by the Office. 
Vendar če vložnik ugovora v obrazložitvi svojega ugovora navede, da je novi imetnik (ali uporabi podobne izraze), ga mora Urad pozvati, naj navede datum, ko je bila prijava za registracijo prenosa poslana Uradu ali ko jo je Urad prejel.
Opposition based on a national registration or application 
Ugovor, ki temelji na registraciji ali prijavi nacionalne blagovne znamke
An opposition based on a national registration or application may be entered by the ‘old' owner or by the successor in title, as there are different practices in the different Member States regarding the need to register the transfer in the national trade mark register in order to be able to claim rights arising from the registration. 
Ugovor, ki temelji na registraciji ali prijavi nacionalne blagovne znamke, lahko vloži prejšnji imetnik ali pravni naslednik, saj so v različnih državah članicah različne prakse glede potrebe po vpisu prenosa v nacionalni register blagovnih znamk za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz registracije.
g. evidence of the transfer or of the granting of a licence before the opposition was filed) has to be proved within the time limit for substantiation. 
Vendar je treba upravičenost do vložitve ugovora (npr. dokazi o prenosu ali podelitvi licence pred vložitvijo ugovora) dokazati v roku za utemeljitev.
Multiple opponents 
Več vložnikov ugovora
Articles 2(1) and 73(1) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(1) in člen 73(1) Delegirane uredbe
In some cases there is more than one opponent indicated in the notice of opposition. 
V nekaterih primerih je v ugovoru naveden več kot en vložnik.
There are only two situations in which the Office accepts two or more separate persons (either natural or legal) as multiple opponents, namely: 
Možna sta samo dva primera, v katerih Urad priznava dve ali več oseb (fizičnih ali pravnih) kot vložnike ugovora, in sicer:
if they are co-owners of the earlier mark or right; 
če so soimetniki prejšnje znamke ali pravice,
if the opposition is filed by the owner or co-owner of an earlier mark or right together with one or more licensees of these earlier marks/rights. 
če imetnik ali soimetnik prejšnje znamke ali pravice ugovor vloži skupaj z enim ali več pridobitelji licence za te prejšnje znamke ali pravice.
If there is no indication that the multiple opponents fulfil one of the two requirements mentioned above, they will be asked to indicate their relationship (co-owners or owner/licensee) or to indicate one of the multiple opponents as the only opponent. 
Če ni razvidno, da več vložnikov ugovora izpolnjuje eno od zgornjih dveh zahtev, bodo pozvani, naj pojasnijo svoje razmerje (solastništvo ali lastnik/pridobitelj licence) ali naj enega od več vložnikov ugovora imenujejo za edinega vložnika ugovora.
If an earlier mark and/or an earlier right has more than one proprietor (co-ownership), the opposition may be filed by any or all of them. 
Če ima prejšnja znamka in/ali prejšnja pravica več kot enega imetnika (solastništvo), lahko ugovor vloži kateri koli od njih ali pa ga vložijo vsi.
However, if the opponents inform the Office that, for example, Company A B.V. owns five of the earlier rights and Company A PLC owns another five, they will have to indicate with whom the opposition will continue. 
Vendar če vložniki ugovora Urad obvestijo, da je na primer podjetje A B.V. imetnik petih prejšnjih pravic in podjetje A PLC imetnik drugih petih, bodo morali navesti, s katerim od teh imetnikov se bo nadaljeval ugovor.
As a consequence, five out of the ten earlier rights will not be taken into account. 
Pet od desetih prejšnjih pravic se torej ne bo upoštevalo.
If the opponents do not respond appropriately within the 2-month time limit set, the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible. 
Če vložniki ugovora ne odgovorijo ustrezno v določenem dvomesečnem roku, bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
Acceptable 
Sprejemljivo
The second combination is acceptable only if at least A is one of the opponents. 
Druga kombinacija je sprejemljiva samo, če je vsaj oseba A eden od vložnikov ugovora.
Not acceptable 
Nesprejemljivo
The opponents will have to be asked to indicate whether they want to continue the proceedings with A or B as an opponent. 
Vložnike ugovora bo treba pozvati, naj navedejo, ali želijo postopek nadaljevati z osebo A ali B kot vložnikom ugovora.