natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(a) a party affixes the sign constituting its company name, trade name or shop name to the goods or; 
stranka na blago namesti znak, ki sestavlja ime podjetja, trgovsko ime ali ime trgovine, ali
(b) even though the sign is not affixed, the party uses the sign in such a way that a link is established between the company, trade or shop name and the goods or services (11/09/2007, C17/06, Céline, EU:C:2007:497, § 2123). 
kljub temu, da znak ni nameščen, ga stranka uporablja tako, da je vzpostavljena povezava med imenom podjetja, trgovskim imenom ali imenom trgovine in blagom ali storitvami (11/09/2007, C17/06, Céline, EU:C:2007:497, § 2123).
Provided that either of these two conditions is met, the fact that a word element is used as the company's trade name does not preclude its use as a mark to designate goods or services (30/11/2009, T353/07, Coloris, EU:T:2009:475, § 38). 
Če je izpolnjen kateri koli od teh pogojev, dejstvo, da se kot trgovsko ime podjetja uporablja besedni element, ne preprečuje njegove uporabe kot blagovne znamke za označevanje blaga ali storitev (30/11/2009, T353/07, Coloris, EU:T:2009:475, § 38).
For example, the presentation of the business name at the top of order forms or invoices, depending on how the sign appears on them may be suitable to support genuine use of the registered trade mark (06/11/2014, T463/12, MB, EU:T:2014:935, § 4445). 
Na primer, prikaz poslovnega imena na vrhu naročilnic ali računov, odvisno od tega, kako je znak na njih prikazan, je lahko ustrezen v podporo resni in dejanski uporabi registrirane blagovne znamke (06/11/2014, T463/12, MB, EU:T:2014:935, § 4445).
However, mere use of a business name at the top of invoices without a clear reference to specific products/services is not sufficient. 
Vendar ni dovolj le uporaba poslovnega imena na vrhu računov brez jasnega sklicevanja na posebne proizvode/storitve.
Use of a sign as a domain name or as part of a domain name primarily identifies the website as such. 
Uporaba znaka kot domenskega imena ali dela domenskega imena v glavnem identificira spletišče kot tako.
However, depending on the circumstances, such use may also be use of a registered mark (this presupposes that it connects to a site on which the goods and services appear). 
Vendar je lahko takšna uporaba glede na okoliščine tudi uporaba registrirane znamke (na podlagi domneve, da je povezana s spletnim mestom, na katerem so prikazani blago in storitve).
The mere fact that the opponent has registered a domain name containing the earlier trade mark is not sufficient in itself to prove genuine use of the trade mark. 
Le dejstvo, da je vložnik ugovora registriral domensko ime, ki vključuje prejšnjo blagovno znamko, samo po sebi ne zadostuje za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi blagovne znamke.
It is necessary for the party to prove that the relevant goods or services are offered under the trade mark contained in the domain name. 
Stranka mora dokazati, da se zadevno blago ali storitve ponujajo pod blagovno znamko, ki je del domenskega imena.
2.3.1.2 Use of collective and certification marks 
Uporaba kolektivnih in certifikacijskih znamk
National and EU collective marks and certification marks can also constitute ‘earlier trade marks' within the meaning of Article 8(2) EUTMR on which an opposition can be based and, as such, be subject to the requirement of use pursuant to Article 47(2) and (3) EUTMR. 
Nacionalne kolektivne in certifikacijske znamke ter kolektivne in certifikacijske znamke EU so lahko tudi prejšnje blagovne znamke v smislu člena 8(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, na katerih temelji ugovor, in zanje kot take lahko velja zahteva glede uporabe v skladu s členom 47(2) in (3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The requirements of the EUTMR relating to the conditions of use apply. 
Uporabljajo se zahteve iz Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v zvezi s pogoji uporabe.
However, the different function of these marks must be taken into account. 
Vendar je treba upoštevati drugačno funkcijo teh znamk.
The opponent must demonstrate that the authorised persons (see paragraph 2.9.3 below) used the collective or certification mark in accordance with its essential function. 
Vložnik ugovora mora dokazati, da so pooblaščene osebe (glej odstavek 2.9.3 v nadaljevanju) kolektivno ali certifikacijsko znamko uporabljale v skladu z njeno bistveno funkcijo.
The essential function of a collective mark is to distinguish the goods or services of the members of the association that is the proprietor of the mark from those of other undertakings. 
Bistvena funkcija kolektivne znamke je razlikovati blago ali storitve članov združenja, ki je imetnik znamke, od blaga ali storitev drugih podjetij.
The specific characteristic of collective marks is to indicate the collective trade origin of the goods or services (and not an individual trade origin as is the case with individual marks). 
Posebna značilnost kolektivnih znamk je, da označujejo kolektivni trgovski izvor blaga ali storitev (ne pa posamezni trgovski izvor kot v zvezi s posameznimi blagovnimi znamkami).
The essential function of a certification mark is not to indicate trade origin, as for individual and collective marks, but to differentiate the goods and services that are certified by the proprietor of the mark as meeting established standards and possessing particular characteristics from those that are not so certified. 
Bistvena funkcija certifikacijske znamke ni označba trgovskega izvora kot pri posameznih in kolektivnih blagovnih znamkah, temveč razlikovanje blaga in storitev, v zvezi s katerimi imetnik znamke certificira, da izpolnjujejo veljavne standarde in imajo posebne značilnosti v primerjavi z blagom in storitvami, ki niso tako certificirani.
2.3.2 Public use in the course of trade 
Javna uporaba v gospodarskem prometu
2.3.2.1 Public use versus internal use 
Javna uporaba v primerjavi z notranjo uporabo
The use must be public, that is to say it must be external and apparent to actual or potential customers of the goods or services. 
Uporaba mora biti javna, tj. biti mora zunanja in vidna dejanskim ali potencialnim strankam za blago ali storitve.
Use in the private sphere or purely internal use within a company or a group of companies does not amount to genuine use (09/12/2008, C442/07, Radetzky, EU:C:2008:696, § 22; 11/03/2003, C40/01, Minimax, EU:C:2003:145, § 37; 09/09/2015, T584/14, ZARA, EU:T:2015:604, § 33). 
Zasebna uporaba ali uporaba za povsem notranje namene v podjetju ali skupini podjetij ne pomeni resne in dejanske uporabe (09/12/2008, C442/07, Radetzky, EU:C:2008:696, § 22; 11/03/2003, C40/01, Minimax, EU:C:2003:145, § 37; 09/09/2015, T584/14, ZARA, EU:T:2015:604, § 33).
The mark must be used publicly and outwardly in the context of commercial activity with a view to economic advantage for the purpose of ensuring an outlet for the goods and services that it represents (12/03/2003, T174/01, Silk Cocoon, EU:T:2003:68, § 39; 30/04/2008, T131/06, Sonia Sonia Rykiel, EU:T:2008:135, § 38). 
Znamko je treba uporabljati javno in zunanje v okviru poslovne dejavnosti zaradi pridobivanja gospodarske koristi za zagotavljanje trga za blago in storitve, ki jih znamka označuje (12/03/2003, T174/01, Silk Cocoon, EU:T:2003:68, § 39; 30/04/2008, T131/06, Sonia Sonia Rykiel, EU:T:2008:135, § 38).
Outward use does not necessarily imply use aimed at end consumers. 
Zunanja uporaba ne pomeni nujno uporabe, usmerjene na končne potrošnike.
For instance, the relevant evidence can validly stem from an intermediary, whose activity consists of identifying professional purchasers, such as distribution companies, to which the intermediary sells products it has had manufactured by original producers (21/11/2013, T524/12, RECARO, EU:T:2013:604, § 2526). 
Ustrezni dokazi lahko na primer veljavno izhajajo od posrednika, čigar poslovna dejavnost zajema identifikacijo strokovnih kupcev, kot so distribucijske družbe, ki jim posrednik prodaja izdelke, ki so jih proizvedli prvotni proizvajalci (21/11/2013, T524/12, RECARO, EU:T:2013:604, § 2526).
Relevant evidence can also validly come from a distribution company that forms part of a group. 
Ustrezni dokazi lahko veljavno izhajajo iz distribucijske družbe, ki je del skupine.
Distribution is a method of business organisation that is common in the course of trade and implies use of the mark that cannot be regarded as purely internal use by a group of companies, since the mark is also used outwardly and publicly (17/02/2011, T324/09, Friboi, EU:T:2011:47, § 32). 
Distribucija je način poslovne organizacije, ki je običajen v gospodarskem prometu in pomeni uporabo blagovne znamke, ki je ni mogoče šteti za uporabo za povsem notranje namene skupine podjetij, saj se blagovna znamka uporablja tudi zunanje in javno (17/02/2011, T324/09, Friboi, EU:T:2011:47, § 32).
Use of the mark must relate to goods or services already marketed or about to be marketed and for which preparations by the undertaking to secure customers are under way. 
Uporaba blagovne znamke se mora nanašati na blago ali storitve, ki se že tržijo ali se bodo kmalu začeli tržiti in v zvezi s katerimi podjetje že izvaja dejavnosti za pritegnitev strank.
Mere preparation to use the mark - such as the printing of labels, producing of containers, etc. - is internal use and, therefore, not use in the course of trade for the present purposes (11/03/2003, C40/01, Minimax, EU:C:2003:145, § 37). 
Priprava na uporabo blagovne znamke, kot je tiskanje etiket, izdelava embalaže itd., je notranja uporaba in zato ni uporaba v gospodarskem prometu za zadevne namene (11/03/2003, C40/01, Minimax, EU:C:2003:145, § 37).
2.3.2.2 Commercial activity versus promotional activity 
Poslovna dejavnost v primerjavi s promocijsko dejavnostjo
Where the mark is protected for goods or services of not-for-profit enterprises, and the mark has been used, the fact that there is no profit motive behind the use is irrelevant: ‘The fact that a charitable association does not seek to make profit does not mean that its objective cannot be to create and, later, to preserve an outlet for its goods or services' (09/12/2008, C442/07, Radetzky, EU:C:2008:696, § 17). 
Če je blagovna znamka zaščitena za nepridobitna podjetja za njihovo blago ali storitve in se je uporabljala, je dejstvo, da uporaba nima pridobitnega namena, nepomembno: „Okoliščina, da dobrodelno združenje ne stremi k ustvarjanju dobička, namreč ne izključuje možnosti, da bi bil njegov cilj ustvariti in posledično ohraniti možnosti za prodajo svojega blaga ali storitev“ (09/12/2008, C442/07, Radetzky, EU:C:2008:696, § 17).
Goods and services offered free of charge may constitute genuine use when they are offered commercially, that is to say with the intention of creating or maintaining an outlet for those goods or services in the EU, as opposed to the goods or services of other undertakings, and therefore of competing with them (09/09/2011, T289/09, Omnicare Clinical Research, EU:T:2011:452, § 6768). 
Blago in storitve, ki se ponujajo brezplačno, lahko pomenijo resno in dejansko uporabo, kadar se ponujajo v okviru trgovanja, tj. za ustvarjanje ali ohranjanje trga za zadevno blago ali storitve v EU glede na blago ali storitve drugih podjetij in zato za ustvarjanje konkurence (09/09/2011, T289/09, Omnicare Clinical Research, EU:T:2011:452, § 6768).
Mere use of the mark on promotional material for other goods cannot normally be considered as sufficient (indirect) evidence of use within the meaning of trade mark law for the type of promotional items on which the mark is or has been used. 
Uporabe blagovne znamke le na promocijskem gradivu za drugo blago običajno ni mogoče šteti za zadosten (posreden) dokaz o uporabi v smislu prava o blagovnih znamkah za vrsto promocijskih izdelkov, na katerih se znamka uporablja ali se je uporabljala.
For example, giving away articles of clothing such as T-shirts and baseball caps at promotional events with the purpose of marketing a certain other product, such as a drink, cannot be considered as genuine use of the mark at issue for clothing. 
Na primer, brezplačnega razširjanja kosov oblačil, kot so majice s kratkimi rokavi in kape s ščitnikom, na promocijskih dogodkih zaradi trženja nekega drugega proizvoda, kot je pijača, ni mogoče šteti za resno in dejansko uporabo zadevne znamke za oblačila.
The Office practice concerning ‘genuine use' with regard to promotional articles has been confirmed by the Court. 
Sodišče je potrdilo prakso Urada glede resne in dejanske uporabe za promocijske izdelke.
2.3.3 Use in relation to goods or services 
Uporaba v zvezi z blagom ali storitvami
2.3.3.1 Use in relation to goods 
Uporaba v zvezi z blagom
Trade marks have traditionally been used on goods (printed on the goods, on labels, etc.) or their packaging. 
Blagovne znamke se tradicionalno uporabljajo na blagu (natisnjene so na blago, etikete itd.) ali njegovi embalaži.
However, showing use on goods or their packaging is not the only way of proving use in relation to goods. 
Vendar dokazovanje uporabe na blagu ali njegovi embalaži ni edini način za dokazovanje uporabe v zvezi z blagom.
It is sufficient, if there is a proper connection between the mark and the goods, for the mark to be used ‘in relation to' the goods or services, such as on brochures, flyers, stickers, signs inside places of sale, etc. 
Če med znamko in blagom obstaja ustrezna povezava, zadostuje, da se blagovna znamka uporablja v zvezi z blagom ali storitvami, na primer na brošurah, letakih, nalepkah, znakih v notranjosti prodajnih mest itd.
For example, when the opponent sells its goods only through catalogues (mail-order sales) or the internet, the mark may not always appear on the packaging or even on the goods themselves. 
Če na primer vložnik ugovora prodaja blago le prek katalogov (prodaja po pošti) ali spleta, znamka na embalaži ali celo na blagu morda ni vedno prikazana.
In such cases, use on the (internet) pages where the goods are presented - provided it is otherwise genuine in terms of time, place, extent and nature (see paragraph 2.3.4.4 below) - will generally be considered sufficient. 
V takšnih primerih se bo na splošno štelo, da zadostuje uporaba na (spletnih) straneh, kjer je predstavljeno blago, če je sicer resna in dejanska v smislu časa, kraja, obsega in narave (glej odstavek 2.3.4.4 v nadaljevanju).
The owner of the mark will not have to provide proof that the mark actually appeared on the goods themselves. 
Imetniku znamke ne bo treba predložiti dokaza, da je bilo blago dejansko opremljeno z znamko.
However, the situation is different when a trade mark is used, for example, in a catalogue or advertisements, or on bags or invoices, to designate the retailer of the goods and not the goods themselves. 
Vendar je položaj drugačen, če se blagovna znamka uporablja na primer v katalogu ali oglasnih sporočilih oziroma na vrečkah ali računih, da se označi trgovca z blagom na drobno, ne pa blago.
2.3.3.2 Use in relation to services 
Uporaba v zvezi s storitvami
Marks cannot be directly used ‘on' services. 
Znamk ni mogoče uporabljati neposredno s storitvami.
Therefore, use of marks registered for services will generally be on business paper, in advertising, or in some other way directly or indirectly related to the services. 
Znamke, registrirane za storitve, se bodo zato na splošno uporabljale na poslovnih dokumentih, v oglaševanju ali na drug način, ki je neposredno ali posredno povezan s storitvami.
Where the use on such items demonstrates genuine use, such use will be sufficient. 
Če se na takšnih elementih dokaže resna in dejanska uporaba, bo takšna uporaba zadostovala.
2.3.3.3 Use in advertising 
Uporaba v oglaševanju
Trade marks fulfil their function of indicating the commercial origin of goods or services and symbols of the goodwill of their owner not only when they are actually used on or for goods or services, but also when they are used in advertising. 
Blagovne znamke svoje funkcije označevanja trgovskega izvora blaga ali storitev in simbolov dobrega imena imetnika ne izpolnjujejo le, kadar se dejansko uporabljajo na blagu ali storitvah ali v zvezi z njimi, temveč tudi takrat, kadar se uporabljajo v oglaševanju.
In fact, the advertising or market communication function of trade marks is one of their most important functions. 
Dejansko je oglaševalska ali tržnokomunikacijska funkcija blagovnih znamk ena od njihovih najpomembnejših funkcij.
Therefore, use in advertising will generally be considered as amounting to genuine use: 
Zato se bo na splošno upoštevalo, da uporaba v oglaševanju pomeni resno in dejansko uporabo:
if the volume of advertising is sufficient to constitute genuine public use of the mark; and 
če obseg oglaševanja zadostuje za resno in dejansko javno uporabo znamke in
if a relation can be established between the mark and the goods or services for which the mark is registered. 
če je mogoče opredeliti povezavo med znamko in blagom ali storitvami, za katere je znamka registrirana.
The Court confirmed this approach in the Minimax case, where it held that use of the mark must relate to goods or services already marketed or about to be marketed and for which preparations by the undertaking to secure customers are under way, particularly in the form of advertising campaigns (11/03/2003, C40/01, Minimax, EU:C:2003:145, § 37). 
Sodišče je ta pristop potrdilo v zadevi Minimax, v kateri je odločilo, da se mora uporaba znamke nanašati na blago ali storitve, ki se že tržijo ali se bodo kmalu začeli tržiti in v zvezi s katerimi podjetje že izvaja dejavnosti za pritegnitev strank, zlasti z oglaševalskimi kampanjami (11/03/2003, C40/01, Minimax, EU:C:2003:145, § 37).
However, the outcome in a particular case will depend very much on the individual circumstances, as demonstrated by the following examples: 
Vendar bo izid v zadevnem primeru zelo odvisen od posameznih okoliščin, kot ponazarjajo naslednji primeri:
Where advertising is carried out in parallel with the marketing of goods and services and there is proof of both activities, advertising will support the genuineness of the use. 
Če oglaševanje poteka vzporedno s trženjem blaga in storitev ter obstaja dokaz o obeh dejavnostih, bo oglaševanje podprlo resnost in dejanskost uporabe.
Advertising in advance of the actual marketing of goods and services - if it is with a view to establishing a market for the goods or services - will generally be considered to constitute genuine use. 
Oglaševanje pred dejanskim trženjem blaga in storitev - če je njegov namen vzpostavitev trga za blago ali storitve - se bo na splošno štelo za resno in dejansko uporabo.
Whether mere advertising, without any current or future plans to actually market goods or services, constitutes genuine use appears doubtful. 
Zdi se dvomljivo, da bi bilo mogoče za resno in dejansko uporabo šteti le oglaševanje brez vsakršnih obstoječih ali prihodnjih načrtov za dejansko trženje blaga ali storitev.
As in most other situations, the outcome will depend on the circumstances of each case. 
Izid bo tako kot v večini drugih primerov odvisen od okoliščin posameznega primera.
For example, where the goods or services are available abroad, such as holiday accommodation or particular products, advertising alone may be sufficient to amount to genuine use. 
Na primer, če so blago ali storitve na voljo v tujini, kot so hotelska nastanitev ali posebni proizvodi, lahko že oglaševanje zadostuje za ugotovitev resne in dejanske uporabe.
2.3.3.4 Use on the internet 
Uporaba na spletu
The standard applied when assessing evidence in the form of printouts from the internet is no stricter than when evaluating other forms of evidence. 
Standard, ki se uporablja pri presoji dokazov v obliki izpisov s spleta, ni nič strožji od standarda, ki se uporablja pri presoji drugih oblik dokazov.
Consequently, the presence of the trade mark on websites can show inter alia the nature of its use or the fact that products or services bearing the mark have been offered to the public. 
Zato lahko prisotnost blagovne znamke na spletnih straneh med drugim kaže naravo njene uporabe ali dejstvo, da so se proizvodi ali storitve, opremljeni z znamko, ponujali javnosti.
However, the mere presence of a trade mark on a website is, of itself, not sufficient to prove genuine use unless the website also shows the place, time and extent of use or unless this information is otherwise provided. 
Vendar prisotnost blagovne znamke na spletni strani kot taka ne zadostuje za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi, razen če spletna stran prikazuje tudi kraj, čas in obseg uporabe ali če so te informacije predložene kako drugače.
In particular, the value in terms of evidence of internet extracts can be strengthened by submitting evidence that the specific website has been visited and, in particular, that orders for the relevant goods and services have been made through the website by a certain number of customers in the relevant period. 
Dokazno vrednost izvlečkov s spleta je mogoče okrepiti zlasti s predložitvijo dokazov, da je bila zadevna spletna stran obiskana in zlasti da je v upoštevnem obdobju določeno število strank prek te spletne strani oddalo naročila za upoštevno blago in storitve.
For instance, useful evidence in this regard could be records that are generally kept when operating a business web page, for example records relating to the number of hits attained at various points in time or, in some cases, the countries from which the web page has been accessed. 
Na primer, koristen dokaz v zvezi s tem bi lahko bila evidenca, ki se na splošno vodi pri upravljanju poslovne spletne strani, na primer evidenca v zvezi s številom obiskov v različnih obdobjih ali, v nekaterih primerih, državami, iz katerih se dostopa do spletne strani.
As to the relevant period, information on the internet or in online databases is considered to be of the date on which the information was posted. 
Glede upoštevnega obdobja v zvezi z informacijami na spletu ali v spletnih podatkovnih zbirkah se šteje, da so z dne, ko so bile objavljene.
Internet websites often contain highly relevant information. 
Spletna mesta pogosto vsebujejo zelo pomembne informacije.
Certain information may even be available only from such websites. 
Nekatere informacije so lahko na voljo le na takšnih spletiščih.
This includes, for example, online catalogues that are not available in printed format. 
To na primer vključuje spletne kataloge, ki niso na voljo v tiskani obliki.
The nature of the internet can make it difficult to establish the actual date on which information was in fact made available to the public. 
Zaradi narave spleta je težko ugotoviti dejanski datum, ko so bile informacije dejansko dostopne javnosti.
For instance, not all web pages mention when they were published. 
Na vseh spletnih straneh na primer ni navedeno, kdaj so bile objavljene.
In addition, websites are easily updated, yet most do not provide any archive of previously displayed material, nor do they display records that enable members of the public to establish precisely what was published when. 
Poleg tega se spletne strani zlahka posodabljajo, pri čemer jih večina nima nikakršnega arhiva predhodno objavljenega gradiva, poleg tega ne vključujejo evidenc, ki bi javnosti omogočile, da natančno opredeli, kaj je bilo objavljeno in kdaj.
In this context, the date of use on the internet will be considered reliable in particular where: 
V zvezi s tem se bo upoštevalo, da je datum uporabe na spletu zanesljiv, zlasti kadar:
the website time-stamps each entry and thus provides information relating to the history of modifications applied to a file or web page (for example, as available for Wikipedia or as automatically appended to content, e.g. forum messages and blogs); or 
spletna stran označi vsak vnos s časovnim žigom in tako zagotavlja informacije o zgodovini sprememb, opravljenih na datoteki ali spletni strani (kot je na primer na voljo za Wikipedijo ali samodejno pripeto vsebini, npr. objavam na forumih ali spletnim dnevnikom), ali
indexing dates are given to the web page by search engines (e.g. from the Google™ cache); or 
iskalniki spletni strani pripišejo datume indeksiranja (npr. iz predpomnilnika Google™), ali
a screenshot of a web page bears a given date. 
je na posnetku zaslona spletne strani viden datum.