natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘Newspapers; Magazines; Books' requested to read ‘Newspapers; Magazines; All the aforementioned goods except dictionaries' or ‘Newspapers; Magazines; All the aforementioned goods being dictionaries'; this restriction cannot be accepted as, by excluding the broad category of ‘Books', the remaining goods to which the restriction refers no longer contain the subcategory of ‘Dictionaries'. 
Izraz časopisi; revije; knjige naj bi se v skladu z zahtevo glasil časopisi; revije; vse navedeno blago razen slovarjev ali časopisi; revije; vse navedeno blago, ki so slovarji; te omejitve ni mogoče sprejeti, saj preostalo blago, na katero se omejitev nanaša, z izključitvijo široke kategorije knjige ne vsebuje več podkategorije slovarji.
‘Newspapers; Magazines; Books, namely dictionaries' requested to read ‘Newspapers; Magazines; Books, namely dictionaries; All the aforementioned goods except cookbooks'; this restriction cannot be granted as with the specification of the broader category of ‘Books', the remaining goods to which the restriction could refer, that is to say, ‘Dictionaries', or even ‘Newspapers' and ‘Magazines', no longer contain the subcategory of ‘Cookbooks' - or are not even considered to be ‘Books' for that matter, as in the latter case of ‘Newspapers' and ‘Magazines'. 
Izraz časopisi; revije; knjige, in sicer slovarji naj bi se v skladu z zahtevo glasil časopisi; revije; knjige, in sicer slovarji; vse navedeno blago razen knjig z recepti; te omejitve ni mogoče odobriti, saj z opredelitvijo širše kategorije knjige preostalo blago, na katero bi se lahko omejitev nanašala, to je slovarji ali celo časopisi in revije, ne vključuje več podkategorije knjige z recepti - ali jih sploh ni več mogoče šteti za knjige kot pri zadnjem primeru časopisi in revije.
A restriction can result in the deletion of an entire class or, on the contrary, in entering a longer list of goods and services than what was originally applied for. 
Omejitev lahko privede do izbrisa celotnega razreda ali, nasprotno, do vnosa daljšega seznama blaga in storitev, kot je bil prvotno prijavljen.
‘Newspapers; Magazines; Books' in Class 16 could, for instance, be restricted to read ‘Newspapers; Magazines; Books, namely dictionaries, cookbooks, biographies, poetry, fairy tales and philosophy books'. 
Izraz časopisi; revije; knjige iz razreda 16 bi lahko bil na primer omejen, tako da bi se glasil časopisi; revije; knjige, in sicer slovarji, knjige z recepti, biografije, poezija, pravljice in knjige s področja filozofije.
Furthermore, according to the criteria mentioned under paragraph 5.3.1 above, the following examples represent acceptable and unacceptable restriction scenarios: 
Poleg tega so v naslednjih primerih v skladu z merili, omenjenimi v odstavku 5.3.1 zgoraj, ponazorjeni scenariji sprejemljive in nesprejemljive omejitve:
In order to be able to restrict them, the goods or services need to be covered by the current specification in the class applied for. 
Da bi se blago ali storitve lahko omejili, morajo biti zajeti s sedanjo prvotno opredelitvijo v razredu, za katerega je bila vložena prijava.
Examples of acceptable restrictions: 
Primeri sprejemljivih omejitev:
Class 16: Books, namely dictionaries; 
Razred 16: Knjige, in sicer slovarji
Class 25: Footwear, only being flip-flops. 
Razred 25: Obutev, od tega samo japonke
Examples of unacceptable restrictions concerning different classes: 
Primeri nesprejemljivih omejitev v zvezi z različnimi razredi:
Class 5: Diagnostic preparations, all for scientific use; 
Razred 5: Diagnostični pripravki, vsi za znanstvene namene
Class 7: Milling machines, only for dental purposes. 
Razred 7: Rezkalni stroji, samo zobozdravstveni
Although ‘Diagnostic preparations' can be found both in Class 1 and Class 5, Class 5 would only cover those for medical or veterinary purposes. 
Čeprav je mogoče izraz diagnostični pripravki najti v razredih 1 in 5, bi razred 5 zajemal le tiste za medicinske ali veterinarske namene.
‘Diagnostic preparations for scientific use' would be proper to Class 1 and therefore cannot be excluded from a Class 5 specification. 
Izraz diagnostični pripravki za znanstvene namene bi bil značilen za razred 1 in ga zato ni mogoče izključiti iz podrobne opredelitve za razred 5.
Similarly, although ‘Milling machines' could indeed also be used by dental technicians, such goods would not be proper to Class 7 but Class 10. 
Podobno, čeprav bi rezkalne stroje dejansko lahko uporabljali tudi zobni tehniki, tako blago ne bi bilo značilno za razred 7, temveč za razred 10.
Therefore, it is impossible to exclude them from Class 7, as they are not contained in the original specification. 
Zato jih ni mogoče izključiti iz razreda 7, saj niso vključeni v prvotno podrobno opredelitev.
Example of an unacceptable restriction within the same class: 
Primer nesprejemljive omejitve v istem razredu:
Original specification in Class 16: Newspapers; Magazines; Books. 
Prvotna podrobna opredelitev v razredu 16: Časopisi; revije; knjige
Restriction request: Newspapers; Magazines; Books; All the aforementioned goods except pencils. 
Zahteva za omejitev: Časopisi; revije, knjige; vse zgoraj navedeno blago razen svinčnikov
It is clearly impossible to exclude a term that is not covered by the original list of goods and services, even if in this case ‘Pencils' would be proper to the same class as the current specification. 
Očitno je, da ni mogoče izključiti izraza, ki ni zajet s prvotnim seznamom blaga in storitev, čeprav bi bil v tem primeru izraz svinčniki značilen za isti razred kot v sedanji podrobni opredelitvi.
Generic references to trade marks will be objected to. 
Splošna sklicevanja na blagovne znamke bodo zavrnjena.
Example of an unacceptable restriction: 
Primer nesprejemljive omejitve:
Class 9: Apparatus for the reproduction of sound, namely iPods. 
Razred 9: Aparati za reprodukcijo zvoka, in sicer iPod-i
Territorial limitations contradicting the unitary nature of an EUTM are not allowed. 
Ozemeljske omejitve, ki so v nasprotju z enotnostjo blagovne znamke EU, niso dovoljene.
Example of an unacceptable limitation: 
Primer nesprejemljive omejitve:
Class 7: Washing machines, only for sale in France. 
Razred 7: Pralni stroji, samo za prodajo v Franciji
This example would be in contradiction to the principle of free movement of goods and uniform protection throughout the entire area of the European Union referred to in Article 28 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 
Ta primer bi bil v nasprotju z načelom prostega pretoka blaga in enotnega varstva na celotnem območju Evropske unije iz člena 28 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Nevertheless, restrictions concerning the origin of goods are, in principle, acceptable, and, under certain circumstances, such as in relation to protected geographical indications (PGIs), might even be necessary. 
Kljub temu so omejitve glede izvora blaga načeloma sprejemljive in so lahko v nekaterih okoliščinah, na primer v zvezi z zaščitenimi geografskimi označbami (ZGO), celo nujne.
For further guidance on restrictions required on the grounds of Article 7(1)(j) to (l) EUTMR, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal. 
Za več smernic o omejitvah, zahtevanih na podlagi člena 7(1)(j) do (l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev.
Example of an acceptable restriction indicating origin: 
Primer sprejemljive omejitve v zvezi z označbo izvora:
Original specification in Class 25: Clothing. 
Prvotna podrobna opredelitev v razredu 25: Oblačila
Restriction request: Clothing made in Vietnam. 
Zahteva za omejitev: Oblačila, narejena v Vietnamu
Such restriction requests are acceptable from the classification examination perspective, but the application can become subject to other objections (e.g. under Article 7(1)(g) EUTMR). 
Take zahteve za omejitev so sprejemljive z vidika preverjanja razvrstitve, vendar se lahko v zvezi s prijavo vložijo drugi ugovori (npr. na podlagi člena 7(1)(g) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Restrictions that are ambiguous regarding the different national regulatory regimes across the European Union will not be accepted. 
Omejitve, ki so dvoumne v zvezi z različnimi nacionalnimi regulativnimi ureditvami v Evropski uniji, ne bodo sprejete.
Class 5: Medicines, only on prescription. 
Razred 5: Zdravila, samo na recept
This example would be considered to go against the judgment of 08/11/2013, T536/10, Premeno, EU:T:2013:586. 
Šteje se, da ta primer ne bi bil v nasprotju s sodbo z dne 08/11/2013, T536/10, Premeno, EU:T:2013:586.
In particular, the criterion mentioned cannot be accepted due to the lack of uniform rules governing sales of medicines requiring prescription within the EU, as explained in paragraphs 31-32 and 47 of said judgment. 
Natančneje, navedenega merila ni mogoče sprejeti zaradi neobstoja enotnih pravil o prodaji zdravil, za katera je v EU potreben recept, kot je pojasnjeno v točkah 31, 32 in 47 navedene sodbe.
Restrictions must be clear and precise. 
Omejitve morajo biti jasne in natančne.
It should be clear which goods or services are excluded by the restriction and which will remain in the specification. 
Jasno je treba opredeliti, katero blago ali storitve so z omejitvijo izključeni in kateri bodo ostali v podrobni opredelitvi.
Restrictions that appear completely nonsensical within the context of the current specification will not be allowed. 
Omejitve, ki se v okviru sedanje podrobne opredelitve zdijo popolnoma nesmiselne, ne bodo dovoljene.
Examples of unacceptable nonsensical restrictions: 
Primeri nesprejemljivih nesmiselnih omejitev:
Class 16: Typewriters, only related to financial services. 
Razred 16: Pisalni stroji, samo v zvezi s finančnimi storitvami
Class 28: Roller skates, for exclusive use by surfers. 
Razred 28: Kotalke, ki jih uporabljajo izključno deskarji
Where there is no possibility that the proposed limited use can be assured on the market, or where the proposed remaining scope of protection is blurred by a limitation that cannot be clearly linked to an existing or a potential market subcategory of the goods or services, the Office will raise an objection. 
Če ni možnosti, da se na trgu zagotovi predlagana omejena uporaba, ali če je predlagani preostali obseg varstva zabrisan z omejitvijo, ki je ni mogoče jasno povezati z obstoječo ali morebitno tržno podkategorijo blaga ali storitev, bo Urad vložil ugovor.
Example of an unacceptable restriction where the goods do not possess such characteristics: 
Primer nesprejemljive omejitve, kadar blago nima takih značilnosti:
Class 31: Oranges, except clockwork. 
Razred 31: Pomaranče, razen mehanizmov za navijanje
The fresh fruit listed in the original specification will not cover any types of mechanical goods. 
Sveže sadje, navedeno v prvotni podrobni opredelitvi, ne zajema nobene vrste mehanskega blaga.
Emphasising this fact by submitting such a disclaimer will not add relevant information to the term, and therefore has no effect on the current scope of protection. 
Če se to dejstvo poudari z navedbo take izključitve, se s tem ne bodo dodale informacije, ki so pomembne za izraz, zato ta izključitev ne učinkuje na sedanji obseg varstva.
Examples of unacceptable restrictions where the remaining scope of protection cannot be exactly determined: 
Primeri nesprejemljivih omejitev, kadar preostalega obsega varstva ni mogoče natančno opredeliti:
Class 31: Fresh fruit, except any red fruit. 
Razred 31: Sveže sadje, razen katerega koli rdečega sadja
While it is true that many fruits share the colour red as one of their characteristics, it is still not clear what exactly is being excluded and what remains in the specification. 
Čeprav je res, da je ena od značilnosti številnih vrst sadja to, da so rdeče barve, še vedno ni jasno, kaj natančno se izključuje in kaj ostaja v podrobni opredelitvi.
This is because even if ‘red fruit' could arguably be the denomination of a subcategory of fruit, the term might refer to only some red-coloured fruit on the market, and not include all of them. 
To pa zato, ker tudi če bi bilo rdeče sadje domnevno poimenovanje podkategorije sadja, bi se lahko zadevni izraz nanašal le na nekatere vrste rdečega sadja na trgu in ne bi vključeval vseh njegovih vrst.
Example of unacceptable restriction lacking clarity and precision: 
Primer nesprejemljive omejitve, ki je nejasna in nenatančna:
Class 7: Machines, in particular bulldozers. 
Razred 7: Stroji, zlasti stroji za zemeljska dela
An unclear and imprecise term is not clarified or specified by simply mentioning an example of what it could cover. 
Nejasnega in nenatančnega izraza ni mogoče pojasniti ali opredeliti le z navedbo primera tistega, kar bi lahko zajemal.
Using the expressions ‘including', ‘in particular', ‘for example' or ‘such as', as well as ‘included in this class' or 'not included in other classes', does not constitute a valid restriction or specification of the preceding goods or services. 
Uporaba izrazov vključno s/z, zlasti, na primer ali kot je/so in ki jih zajema ta razred ali ki jih ne zajemajo drugi razredi ne pomeni veljavne omejitve ali podrobne opredelitve predhodno navedenega blaga ali storitev.
For further information see paragraph 4.1.2 above. 
Za več informacij glej odstavek 4.1.2 zgoraj.
Punctuation also plays an important role in determining the scope of a restriction, as explained in paragraph 4.1.4 above. 
Pri opredelitvi obsega omejitve imajo pomembno vlogo tudi ločila, kot je pojasnjeno v odstavku 4.1.4 zgoraj.
This is especially important in connection with formulations such as ‘all the aforementioned goods except for use in connection with […]' or ‘the aforementioned services exclusively related to […]': 
To je zlasti pomembno v zvezi s formulacijami, kot so vse zgoraj navedeno blago razen za uporabo v zvezi s/z […] ali zgoraj navedene storitve, ki se izključno nanašajo na […].
Thus, a restriction in Class 9 reading ‘operating systems; text processing applications; games software; all the aforementioned goods for the sole use with tablet computers' will be interpreted as intending to limit all these goods, equally due to the use of a semicolon separating the restriction from the rest of the list. 
Zato se bo omejitev v razredu 9, ki se glasi operacijski sistemi; aplikacije za obdelavo besedil; programska oprema za igrice; vse predhodno navedeno blago za izključno uporabo s tabličnimi računalniki, razumela, kot da se z njo želi v enaki meri omejiti vse to blago, in sicer zaradi uporabe podpičja, ki loči omejitev od preostalega seznama.
However, a restriction in Class 9 reading ‘operating systems; text processing applications; games software, all the aforementioned goods for the sole use with tablet computers' will be interpreted as limiting only the use of games software, since, if separated with a comma, the restriction merely involves the last preceding term delimited by a semicolon. 
Vendar se bo omejitev v razredu 9, ki se glasi operacijski sistemi; aplikacije za obdelavo besedil; programska oprema za igrice, vse predhodno navedeno blago za izključno uporabo s tabličnimi računalniki razumela, kot da se z njo omejuje le uporaba programske opreme za igrice, saj se omejitev, če je ločena le z vejico, nanaša le na zadnji prehodni izraz, zamejen s podpičjem.
A restriction by the addition of ‘all the aforementioned goods, excluding […]' or ‘all the previously mentioned services, only with regard to […]' at the end of the specification within a class and separated by a semicolon will be accepted as long as it can reasonably be applied to at least one product or service it refers to in that class. 
Omejitev z dodatkom izraza vse predhodno navedeno blago, razen […] ali vse predhodno navedene storitve le v zvezi s/z […] na konec podrobne opredelitve v razredu, pri čemer je ta izraz ločen s podpičjem, bo sprejeta, če jo je mogoče razumno uporabiti za vsaj en izdelek ali storitev, na katerega oziroma katero se sklicuje v navedenem razredu.
At the same time the criteria mentioned under paragraph 5.3.1 above need to be observed. 
Ob tem je treba upoštevati tudi merila, navedena v odstavku 5.3.1 zgoraj.
Should a restriction request be acceptable only in part, the Office will inform the applicant and set a time limit of 2 months for submitting observations. 
Če je zahteva za omejitev sprejemljiva le delno, bo Urad obvestil prijavitelja in določil dvomesečni rok za predložitev pripomb.
If no observations are submitted within the given time limit, the restriction request will be partly refused, and the Office will amend the specification in accordance with the acceptable part of the restriction. 
Če se pripombe ne predložijo v danem roku, bo zahteva za omejitev delno zavrnjena, Urad pa bo podrobno opredelitev spremenil v skladu s sprejemljivim delom omejitve.
The proceedings will then continue on the basis of that list (11/12/2014, C31/14 P, Premeno, EU:C:2014:2436, § 51-52). 
Postopek se bo nato nadaljeval na podlagi navedenega seznama (11/12/2014, C31/14 P, Premeno, EU:C:2014:2436, § 51-52).
For information on the language of the request, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 1, Proceedings, paragraphs 5 and 5.1.1. 
Za informacije o jeziku zahteve glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 1: Postopek, odstavka 5 in 5.1.1.
5.3.3 Interpretation going beyond the general criteria 
Razlaga, ki presega splošna merila
Restrictions need to be taken into account in the context of the proceedings in which they are requested. 
Omejitve je treba upoštevati v okviru postopka, v katerem se zahtevajo.
Depending on the stage of proceedings, various additional principles and rules based on specific case-law might need to be followed. 
Glede na fazo postopka bo morda treba upoštevati razna dodatna načela in pravila na podlagi konkretne sodne prakse.
For more detailed information on different proceedings, each respective part of the Guidelines should be consulted as appropriate - Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 10, Trade marks in Conflict with Designations of Origin and Geographical Indications (Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR); Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, and Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 1, General Principles; Part E: Register Operations, Section 1, Changes in a Registration, and Section 2: Conversion; and Part M, International Marks. 
Podrobnejše informacije o različnih postopkih je treba poiskati v posameznih zadevnih delih Smernic, kot je ustrezno, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavje 10: Blagovne znamke, ki sovpadajo z označbami porekla in geografskimi označbami (člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU); del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, in razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 1: Splošna načela; del E: Registri, razdelek 1: Spremembe registracije, in razdelek 2: Konverzija; in del M: Mednarodne znamke.
5.4 Addition of classes 
Dodatek razredov
Under the provisions of Article 49(2) EUTMR, it is possible to add a class or classes to an application, but only where the goods or services detailed in the original application were clearly included in the wrong class or when the goods or services have been clarified and need to be classified in new class(es). 
V skladu z določbami člena 49(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je mogoče prijavi dodati razred ali razrede, vendar le kadar so bili blago ali storitve iz prvotne prijave očitno vključeni v napačen razred ali kadar je bila vrsta blaga ali storitev pojasnjena in jo je treba razvrstiti v novi(e) razred(e).
For example, the original list of goods in Class 33 reads alcoholic beverages including beer, wines and spirits. 
Na primer, prvotni seznam blaga iz razreda 33 se glasi alkoholne pijače, vključno s pivom, vini in žganimi pijačami.
Since beer [alcoholic beverages] is proper to Class 32, the applicant will be requested to transfer the term to Class 32, even if Class 32 was not listed in the original application. 
Ker je pivo (alkoholne pijače) značilno za razred 32, bo prijavitelj pozvan, naj izraz prenese v razred 32, čeprav ta ni bil naveden v prvotni prijavi.
If the applicant agrees, the application will then cover the said goods in Classes 32 and 33. 
Če se prijavitelj strinja, bo prijava nato zajemala zadevno blago iz razredov 32 in 33.
When transferring a term from one class to another, the scope of protection originally applied for, defined by additional information, also needs to be taken into account. 
Pri prenosu izraza iz enega razreda v drugega je treba upoštevati tudi obseg varstva, za katerega je bila prvotno vložena prijava, opredeljenega z dodatnimi informacijami.
In the example above, the simple addition of the term beer to Class 32 would in fact mean an unacceptable broadening of the original scope of protection, since the application only includes alcoholic beverages. 
V zgornjem primeru bi preprost dodatek izraza pivo v razred 32 dejansko pomenil nesprejemljivo širitev prvotnega obsega varstva, saj prijava vključuje le izraz alkoholne pijače.
As such, the term beer in Class 32 would, however, also cover non-alcoholic beer, thus going beyond the original scope of protection. 
Vendar bi izraz pivo iz razreda 32 zajemal tudi brezalkoholno pivo, kar presega prvoten obseg varstva.
Therefore, to illustrate the principle, the term to be transferred to Class 32 should specifically read beer [alcoholic beverages]. 
Za ponazoritev zadevnega načela bi se zato moral izraz, ki ga je treba prenesti v razred 32, natančno glasiti pivo (alkoholne pijače).
When classes are added, additional fees may be payable and the applicant must be informed accordingly. 
Kadar se dodajo razredi, je morda treba plačati dodatne pristojbine, o čemer je treba ustrezno obvestiti prijavitelja.
5.5 Timing of objections 
Časovni okvir za ugovore
Classification objections should be raised as early as possible during the examination process, before publishing the application. 
Ugovore v zvezi z razvrstitvijo je treba med postopkom preizkusa vložiti čim prej, in sicer pred objavo prijave.
As a general rule, it is not Office practice to reassess the classification of an application after publication. 
Urad praviloma razvrstitve prijave po objavi ne presoja ponovno.
There are, however, occasions when raising a late objection is justified in order to avoid manifest errors of law or assessment, such as when the error is clearly against the provisions of Article 33 EUTMR and could prevent competent authorities or economic operators from identifying competition/determining the exact scope of protection. 
Vendar so primeri, v katerih je vložitev ugovora upravičena, da se prepreči očitno napačna uporaba prava ali napačna presoja, na primer kadar je napaka očitno v nasprotju z določbami člena 33 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in bi lahko pristojnim organom ali gospodarskim subjektom preprečila opredelitev konkurence/določitev natančnega obsega varstva.
Thus, in accordance with Article 44(3) EUTMR, where the publication of the application contains an error attributable to the Office, the Office will correct the error and publish the correction of its own motion or at the request of the applicant. 
Če je zato v skladu s členom 44(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v objavi prijave napaka, ki jo je mogoče pripisati Uradu, Urad to napako popravi na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo prijavitelja ter objavi popravek.
Article 46(2) EUTMR and Articles 2 to 10 EUTMDR apply mutatis mutandis where the correction concerns the list of goods or services of the mark. 
Člen 46(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in členi od 2 do 10 Delegirane uredbe se smiselno uporabljajo, kadar se popravek nanaša na seznam blaga ali storitev blagovne znamke.
Classification 
Razvrstitev
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part B, Examination Page 24 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del B, Preizkušanje stran 52
6 Annex 
Priloga
Advertising services 27 
Oglaševalske storitve 27
Air freshening and perfuming preparations 27 
Sredstva za dezodoriranje in odišavljanje zraka 27
Amusement apparatus and electronic games 27 
Igralni avtomati in elektronske igre 27
Assembly services 28 
Storitve sestavljanja 28
Association services or services provided by an association to its members 28 
Storitve združenj ali storitve, ki jih združenje zagotavlja svojim članom 28