natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court found that in the present case, the omission of the words ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor' in the form used alters the distinctive character of the mark (paras 31-45). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da izpustitev besed „La Sabiduría del Sabor“ v obliki, ki se uporablja, spreminja razlikovalni značaj znamke (točke od 31 do 45).
‘The earlier trade marks are strongly characterised by the presence of the figurative element. 
Za prejšnje blagovne znamke je zelo značilen figurativni element.
However, the documents submitted during the opposition proceedings and, even if they were to be taken into account, the appeal proceedings, do not show any use of the figurative element contained in the earlier trade marks' (para. 19). 
Vendar iz dokumentov, ki so bili predloženi v postopku ugovora, tudi če bi jih bilo treba upoštevati v postopku pritožbe, ni razvidna nikakršna uporaba figurativnega elementa iz prejšnjih blagovnih znamk (točka 19).
‘Therefore, the Office considers that the alteration of the opponent's trade mark appearing in the way it is currently used is not an acceptable alteration and consequently use of the registered mark is not shown. 
Urad zato meni, da sprememba blagovne znamke vložnika ugovora, ki se pojavlja v obliki, v kateri se uporablja zdaj, ni sprejemljiva sprememba, zato uporaba registrirane znamke ni dokazana.
The Court confirmed that the use of a [standard] typeface does not alter the distinctive character of a word mark. 
Sodišče je potrdilo, da uporaba [standardne] pisave ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja besedne znamke.
It rather helps to distinguish the mark from the descriptive elements ‘ron' and ‘de Cuba' (para. 34). 
Nasprotno, pripomore k razlikovanju znamke od opisnih elementov „ron“ in „de Cuba“ (točka 34).
The Board confirmed OD's views that use of the word mark ‘MILENARIO' written in stylised bold characters did not affect the distinctive character of the mark, as the word ‘MILENARIO' was considered to be the dominant element of the mark registered for sparkly wines and liquors in Class 33 (para. 13). 
Odbor za pritožbe je potrdil stališča oddelka za ugovore, da uporaba besedne znamke „MILENARIO“, napisane v stiliziranih črkah v krepkem tisku, ni vplivala na razlikovalni značaj znamke, saj se upošteva, da je beseda „MILENARIO“ prevladujoči element znamke, registrirane za peneča vina in likerje iz razreda 33 (točka 13).
Representation of the word mark, registered for pharmaceutical and sanitary preparations; plasters; materials for dressings; fungicides; disinfectants covered by the earlier trade mark in Class 5, in a stylised form together with figurative elements was not considered as substantially changing the distinctive character of the word trade mark ‘AMYCOR' as registered. 
Štelo se je, da prikaz besedne znamke, registrirane za farmacevtske in sanitarne proizvode; obliže, obvezilni material; materiale za obveze; fungicide; razkužila, ki jih označuje prejšnja znamka iz razreda 5, pri čemer je znamka prikazana v stilizirani obliki skupaj s figurativnimi elementi, ne spreminja bistveno razlikovalnega značaja besedne znamke „AMYCOR“, kot je bila registrirana.
‘The applicant's argument that the proof of use is insufficient because it refers to the device mark … and not to the word mark ‘THE ECONOMIST' fails. 
Trditev vložnika ugovora, da je dokaz o uporabi nezadosten, ker se nanaša na figurativno znamko […], in ne na besedno znamko THE ECONOMIST, ne vzdrži.
First, the submitted evidence refers to both earlier marks (i.e. the word mark and the device mark). 
Prvič, predloženi dokazi se nanašajo na obe prejšnji znamki (tj. besedno in figurativno znamko).
Furthermore, use of the earlier device mark constitutes use of the earlier word mark. 
Poleg tega uporaba prejšnje figurativne znamke pomeni uporabo prejšnje besedne znamke.
- Reference in newspaper articles to the word BIOTEX in plain typeface. 
Registrirana oblika Dejanska uporaba Št. zadeve
- The word BIOTEX in white block capitals with the top-most point of the letter ‘I' in darker colouring. 
BIOTEX (različna) 02/10/2001, R 812/20001 BIO TEK (fig.) / BIOTEX
- The word BIOTEX in white upper and lower cases block letters on a darker background incorporating a figurative ‘wave' device' (para. 14). 
Črke, ki sestavljajo znamko, so bile na splošno preproste velike tiskane črke brez nenavadnih elementov.
‘The evidence of use shows the mark has remained, in spite of various stylistic changes, essentially BIOTEX. 
Velike črke so včasih preproste in dvodimenzionalne, včasih pa senčene, da dajejo vtis tridimenzionalnosti.
The letters forming the mark have in general been mere block capitals, lacking anything fanciful. 
Zgornji del črke l je včasih drugačne barve.
The Board does not consider that these variations invalidate use of the mark BIOTEX and therefore the contested decision must be annulled at this point' (para. 17). 
Poleg tega meni, da te spremembe ne izpodbijajo uporabe znamke BIOTEX, zato je treba izpodbijano odločbo na tej točki razveljaviti (točka 17).
‘The actual use of the trade mark which can be seen on the beer pack, the newspaper extract and on the calendar is not the use of the registered word mark SILVER, but of the colour device mark, namely a beer label with the word SILVER written in white capital letters in a red banner which overlaps a golden circle which contains the word elements “Bière sans alcool”, “Bière de haute qualité”, “pur malt” and “Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg”. 
Dejanska uporaba znamke, ki jo je mogoče videti na embalaži piva, v odlomku iz časopisa in na koledarju, ni uporaba registrirane besedne znamke SILVER, temveč barvne figurativne znamke, in sicer etikete piva, na kateri je beseda SILVER napisana v belih velikih črkah na rdečem traku, ki prekriva zlat krog, v katerem so besedni elementi Bière sans alcool, Bière de haute qualité, pur malt in Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg.
This does not automatically mean that the mark was not used as registered. 
To samo po sebi ne pomeni, da znamka ni bila uporabljena, kot je bila registrirana.
Each case must be looked at on its own merits. 
Vsaka zadeva se analizira samostojno.
In this case, the Office finds that the mark SILVER is the actual trade mark. 
Urad v tem primeru meni, da je beseda SILVER dejanska blagovna znamka.
The appearance of the other word elements “Bière sans alcool”, “Bière de haute qualité”, “pur malt” and “Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg” and the figurative element is only secondary to the mark SILVER. 
Drugi prikazani besedni elementi Bière sans alcool, Bière de haute qualité, pur malt in Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg ter figurativni element so v primerjavi z znamko SILVER drugotnega pomena.
It is also clear from the marketing study, the newspaper extract and the invoices that the actual trade mark is SILVER. 
Poleg tega je iz tržne študije, odlomka iz časopisa in računov razvidno, da je SILVER dejanska blagovna znamka.
The Office finds that the use of the word SILVER is so dominant in the figurative mark that it fulfils the requirements of having been used as registered.' 
Po mnenju Urada je uporaba besede SILVER tako prevladujoča v figurativni znamki, da izpolnjuje zahteve glede uporabe v obliki, kot je bila registrirana.
12/01/2006, T147/03, Quantum, EU:T:2006:10; dismissed 15/03/2007, C171/06 P, Quantum, EU:C:2007:171 
12/01/2006, T147/03, Quantum, EU:T:2006:10; Pritožba zavrnjena 15/03/2007, C171/06 P, Quantum, EU:C:2007:171
In any case, since the stylisation of the letter “q” suggests, as has just been said, the face of a watch, it is not particularly distinctive for goods in Class 14, the only goods for which the applicant has furnished proof of use of the earlier mark. 
Sicer pa je treba natančneje določiti, da stilizacija črke q, ki namiguje, kot je bilo že povedano, na urino številčnico, ne pomeni posebej razlikovalnega značaja proizvodov iz razreda 14, ki so edini, za katere je tožeča stranka predložila dokaz o uporabi prejšnje znamke.
The word ‘vigar' is an invented word and is, therefore, inherently distinctive. 
Beseda „vigar“ je izmišljena beseda in je zato inherentno razlikovalna.
Given the fact that the word ‘vigar' is the only word element, and given its inherent distinctiveness, its central position and the fact that the additional elements highlight its presence, the word is the most distinctive element of the earlier mark. 
Ker je beseda „vigar“ edini besedni element in zaradi njenega inherentnega razlikovalnega učinka, osrednjega položaja in dejstva, da dodatni elementi poudarjajo njeno prisotnost, je ta beseda najbolj razlikovalen element prejšnje znamke.
The form as used differs from the earlier mark as registered only in the ascending orientation of its oval background, the use of lower case instead of upper case letters and the replacement of the crown element by a sequence of three dots. 
Oblika, ki se uporablja, se razlikuje od prejšnje znamke, kot je bila registrirana, le v ascendentni orientaciji njenega ovalnega ozadja, uporabi malih namesto velikih črk in nadomestitvi elementa krone z zaporedjem treh pik.
The Court agreed that a different orientation of the same background, the use of upper case or lower case letters when they are standard letters that reproduce the same term, or the substitution of an ornamental element (the sequence of dots) for a laudatory element when both of those elements serve to reinforce the term ‘vigar', are minor differences that do not alter the distinctive character of the earlier trade mark as registered. 
Sodišče se je strinjalo, da so drugačna orientacija istega ozadja, uporaba velikih ali malih črk, kadar so običajne črke, ki prikazujejo enak izraz, ali nadomestitev poveličevalnega elementa z okrasnim (zaporedje pik), kadar sta oba elementa namenjena krepitvi izraza „vigar“, majhne razlike, ki ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje blagovne znamke, kot je bila registrirana.
That finding is not called into question if the second form of use is taken into account, inasmuch as, even though, in that case, the basic background disappears and the word ‘spain' is present, the latter will be understood as a merely descriptive addition (paras 70-74). 
O tej ugotovitvi ni mogoče podvomiti, če se upošteva druga oblika uporabe, glede na to, da čeprav v tem primeru izgine osnovno ozadje in je prisotna beseda „spain“, se bo ta štela le za opisni dodatek (točke od 70 do 74).
The distinctive character of the mark is essentially derived, not from its figurative elements, but from the word ‘vieta'. 
Razlikovalni značaj znamke dejansko ne izhaja iz njenih figurativnih elementov, temveč iz besede „vieta“.
The element has a high level of distinctive character and occupies an important position in the overall impression created by the mark as registered, whilst the figurative elements have only weak distinctive character and occupy merely an ancillary position in the overall impression. 
Ta element ima močan razlikovalni značaj in ima pomemben položaj v celotnem vtisu, ki ga ustvarja znamka, kot je bila registrirana, figurativni elementi v celotnem vtisu pa imajo le šibek razlikovalni značaj in le akcesorni položaj.
Those figurative elements, including the typeface used, have a relatively marginal visual impact. 
Ti figurativni elementi, vključno z uporabljeno pisavo, imajo razmeroma zanemarljiv vizualni učinek.
The rectangular border does not present any originality in relation to usual commercial use. 
Štirikotna obroba ni nikakor izvirna z vidika običajne komercialne rabe.
As regards the figurative elements made up of, on the one hand, grey rectangles separating the letters of the word ‘vieta' and, on the other hand, white rectangles appearing in the middle of the sides of the rectangular border, they are very small in size, are not striking and do not present any originality (paras 47 and 48). 
Kar zadeva figurativne elemente, ki so na eni strani sestavljeni iz sivih štirikotnikov, ki ločijo črke besede „vieta“, na drugi strani pa dveh belih štirikotnikov, ki sta na sredi ploskev pravokotne obrobe, so ti zelo majhni in niso izstopajoči, poleg tega niso nikakor izvirni (točki 47 in 48).
‘In relation to the “FETA” product, as regards the two Greek flags next to the word “TAVERNA” it should be noted that the obligation of using a trade mark as registered does not require its proprietor to use the mark in isolation in the course of trade. 
V zvezi s proizvodom FETA je treba glede dveh grških zastav poleg besede TAVERNA opozoriti, da obveznost glede uporabe blagovne znamke, kot je bila registrirana, ne pomeni, da mora imetnik blagovno znamko v gospodarskem prometu uporabljati ločeno.
Article 15(1) CTMR [now Article 18(1) EUTMR] does not preclude the possibility of the trade mark's proprietor adding further (decorative or descriptive) elements, or even other marks such as its house mark on the packaging of the product, as long as the trade mark ‘as registered' remains clearly recognisable and in an individual form. 
Člen 15(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki Skupnosti [zdaj člen 18(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU] ne izključuje možnosti, da imetnik na embalažo proizvoda doda dodatne (okrasne ali opisne) elemente ali celo druge znamke, kot je njegova hišna znamka, če blagovna znamka, kot je bila registrirana, ostane jasno prepoznavna in ohrani individualno obliko.
The two Greek flags do not possess any distinctive character in relation to the products at hand which are commonly known to be food specialities originating from Greece. 
Grški zastavi nimata razlikovalnega značaja v zvezi z zadevnimi proizvodi, ki so na splošno znani kot kulinarične specialitete iz Grčije.
This is supported by the whole get-up of the product, coloured in blue and white in accordance with the colours of the Greek flag, the depiction of scenery which calls to mind a Mediterranean scene and the symbol for a Protected Designation of Origin below the picture' (para. 39). 
To ugotovitev podpirajo celoten videz proizvoda, saj je njegova embalaža modre in bele barve kot grška zastava, slika pokrajine, ki spominja na prizor iz Sredozemlja, in znak za zaščiteno označbo porekla pod sliko (točka 39).
The Court took the view that, if no colour is claimed in the application, the use of different colour combinations ‘must be allowed, as long as the letters contrast against the background.' 
Sodišče je menilo, da če v prijavi ni navedena nobena barva, je treba uporabo različnih barvnih kombinacij dovoliti, če so črke v kontrastu z ozadjem.
The Court also noted that the letters M, A, D were arranged in a particular way in the EUTM. 
Poleg tega je ugotovilo, da so črke M, A in D v blagovni znamki EU razporejene po določenem vzorcu.
Accordingly, representations of the sign that do not alter the arrangement of the letters, or the contrast of colour, constitute genuine use (paras 41 and 45). 
V skladu s tem prikazi znaka, ki ne spreminjajo razporeditve črk ali barvnega kontrasta, pomenijo resno in dejansko uporabo (točki 41 in 45).
The word element was considered to be the dominant feature of the figurative mark, since it was in a central position and in large letters. 
Štelo se je, da je besedni element prevladujoči element figurativne znamke, saj ima osrednji položaj in je napisan z velikimi črkami.
It was considered that the distinctive character was not changed (para. 15). 
Poleg tega se je štelo, da razlikovalni značaj ni bil spremenjen (točka 15).
‘The orange background is the colour of packaging of the products. 
Oranžno ozadje je barva embalaže proizvodov.
The mark is used in black on a white background, outlined in silver similar to the earlier registered mark. 
Znamka se uporablja v črni barvi na belem ozadju, ki je podobno kot v prejšnji registrirani znamki obrobljeno srebrno barvo.
The typeface has been slightly modernised and the small hyphen between “Bi” and “Fi” has been deleted. 
Pisava je nekoliko posodobljena, vezaj med Bi in Fi pa je bil odstranjen.
(with word mark John Deere) 28/10/2009, T137/08, Green/Yellow, EU:T:2009:417 (AG case) 
(z besedno znamko John Deere) 28/10/2009, T137/08, Green/Yellow, EU:T:2009:417 (zadeva AG)
‘The colours covered by the application for registration were designated using the Munsell system as: 9.47 GY3.57/7.45 (green) and 5.06 Y7.63/10.66 (yellow). 
„Barvi, na kateri se nanaša zahteva za registracijo, sta bili označeni na podlagi Munsellovega sistema: 9.47 GY3.57/7.45 (zelena) in 5.06 Y7.63/10.66 (rumena).
The arrangement is described as being ‘green for the vehicle body and yellow for the wheels', as is shown by a picture attached to the application and reproduced below ' (para. 3). 
Opis določa, da je ,trup vozila zelen, kolesa pa rumena‘, kot je prikazano na sliki, priloženi zahtevi in upodobljeni spodaj: ' (točka 3).
‘[A]lthough it is true that the disputed mark was used and promoted in conjunction with the word mark John Deere [underlining added] and that the intervener's advertising expenditure in the European Union was presented as a whole and not individually for each country, the applicant is wrong to claim that it was not proved to the required legal standard that the intervener had used the combination of the colours green and yellow on its goods as a trade mark and that the market penetration of its goods had been deep and long-lasting in all the Member States of the European Union as at 1 April 1996' (para. 46). 
„[﻿ eprav drži, da je bila izpodbijana blagovna znamka uporabljena in razširjana v povezavi z besedno znamko John Deere in so bili intervenientkini stroški oglaševanja v Evropski uniji predstavljeni v celoti, in ne posamezno za vsako državo članico, tožeča stranka napačno trdi, da ni bilo pravno zadostno dokazano, da je intervenientka kombinacijo zelene in rumene barve na svojih proizvodih uporabljala kot znamko in da je bilo 1. aprila 1996 razširjanje teh proizvodov na trgu temeljito in trajno v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije“ (točka 46).
In this case the use of the mark with a different spelling and the addition of the letter ‘C' alter the distinctive character of the registered sign, because the letters ‘VIT' are now seen as a descriptive element, namely ‘VIT C' (which refers to ‘Vitamin C'). 
V tem primeru uporaba znamke z drugačnim črkovanjem in dodana črka „C“ spreminjata razlikovalni značaj registriranega znaka, saj se črke „VIT“ zdaj upoštevajo kot opisni element, in sicer „VIT C“ (ki se nanaša na „vitamin C“).
‘[T]he ‘NOVEDADES' catalogues dated 2004-2009 consistently show the mark and only this version. 
V katalogih NOVEDADES iz obdobja 2004-2009 je dosledno prikazana blagovna znamka in samo ta različica.
This does not constitute use of the mark [as registered] (with or without colour) as admissible under Article 15(1)(a) CTMR [now Article 18(1)(a) EUTMR]. 
To ne pomeni uporabe znamke [kot je bila registrirana] (z barvo ali brez nje), ki je sprejemljiva na podlagi člena 15(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki Skupnosti [zdaj člen 18(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU].
The mere fact that both marks include a word element LLOYD'S is not enough for that purpose, also the figurative elements of the earlier mark must appear in the form as used. 
Le dejstvo, da obe znamki vključujeta besedni element LLOYD'S, ne zadostuje za to; tudi figurativni elementi prejšnje znamke morajo biti prikazani v obliki, ki se uporablja.
The form as used is in a different font, lacks the single letter L at the end and surrounded by an orbital device, and lacks the circular or orbital device around the word ‘LLOYD'S'. 
Oblika, ki se uporablja, ima drugačno pisavo, saj na koncu nima črke L, obdane z orbitalnim figurativnim elementom, in je brez okroglega ali orbitalnega figurativnega elementa okrog besede LLOYD'S.
In other words, all its figurative elements are missing in the form as used. 
Z drugimi besedami, v obliki, ki se uporablja, manjkajo vsi figurativni elementi.
On top, the form as used contains the conspicuous device of a flying bird with a long beak. 
Na vrhu oblike, ki se uporablja, je vpadljiv figurativni element leteče ptice z dolgim kljunom.
The omission of all the figurative elements of the mark as registered and the addition of another figurative element does alter, in the form as used, the distinctive character of the mark and is much more than a mere variation or modernisation' (para. 35). 
Opustitev vseh figurativnih elementov znamke, kot je bila registrirana, in vključitev dodatnega figurativnega elementa v obliko, ki se uporablja, spremeni razlikovalni značaj znamke in je precej več kot le sprememba ali posodobitev (točka 35).
There are significant differences between the sign used and the earlier mark in its registered form. 
Uporabljeni znak je bistveno drugačen od prejšnje blagovne znamke v njeni registrirani obliki.
Those differences are such as to alter, from the perspective of the average French consumer to whom the goods in Class 25 are addressed, the distinctiveness of the earlier mark in its registered form. 
Zaradi teh razlik je z vidika povprečnega francoskega potrošnika, ki so mu namenjeni proizvodi iz razreda 25, spremenjen razlikovalni učinek prejšnje blagovne znamke v registrirani obliki.
The differences between the abovementioned mark and sign are not negligible and the mark and sign cannot be regarded as being broadly equivalent within the meaning of the case-law. 
Navedene razlike med zgorajnavedeno znamko in znakom niso zanemarljive, zato ju ni mogoče obravnavati kot splošno enakovredna v smislu sodne prakse.
Contested sign Case No 
Izpodbijani znak Št. zadeve
CARRERA 09/09/2009, R 260/20094, (revocation) 
CARRERA 09/09/2009, R 260/20094, (razveljavitev)
The proven use of a trade mark for: decorative lettering; increased performance packages; covers for storage compartments; wheel sets and complete wheel sets for summer and winter; and door sill cover plates was considered sufficient proof of use for motor vehicle and land vehicle parts overall, for which the mark was registered. 
Dokazana uporaba blagovne znamke za: okrasno pisavo, pakete za boljšo učinkovitost, pokrove za predelke za shranjevanje, komplete koles in popolne komplete koles za poletje in zimo in zaščitne plošče za pragove se je štela za zadosten dokaz o uporabi za dele motornih in kopenskih vozil na splošno, za katere je bila blagovna znamka registrirana.
The main arguments were that it was used for numerous different motor vehicle parts and the goods for which use had been proven thus covered a wide spectrum of motor vehicle parts: elements of the chassis, the bodywork, the engine, the interior design and decorative elements. 
Glavne trditve so bile, da se je blagovna znamka uporabljala za številne različne dele motornih vozil, zato je blago, za katero je bila uporaba dokazana, zajemalo širok nabor delov motornih vozil: elemente šasije, karoserijo, motor, notranje oblikovanje in okrasne elemente.
The Court held that ‘polish for metals', which in itself is already a subcategory of the class heading term polishing preparations, is sufficiently precise and narrowly defined in terms of the function and intended purpose of the claimed goods. 
Sodišče je odločilo, da je izraz pripravki za poliranje kovin, ki je že sam po sebi podkategorija izraza naslova razreda polirni pripravki, dovolj natančen in omejen v smislu funkcije in namena zadevnega blaga.
No further subcategory can be established without being artificial, and thus, use for the entire category of polish for metals was assumed. 
Ker ni mogoče opredeliti nobene nadaljnje podkategorije, ne da bi ta bila umetna, je bila sprejeta uporaba za celotno kategorijo pripravkov za poliranje kovin.
Turbo 19/06/2007, R 378/20062, TURBO Revocation 
Turbo 19/06/2007, R 378/20062, TURBO Razveljavitev
Thus, the Board found that use of the contested mark had been proved for clothing (para. 22). 
Zato je ugotovil, da je bila dokazana uporaba izpodbijane znamke za oblačila (točka 22).