natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the list of goods/services of the earlier right includes a general indication or a broad category that covers the goods/services of the contested mark in their entirety, the goods/services will be identical (17/01/2012, T522/10, Hell, EU:T:2012:9, § 36). 
Če seznam blaga ali storitev prejšnje pravice vključuje splošno označbo ali širšo kategorijo, ki v celoti zajema blago ali storitve izpodbijane blagovne znamke, so blago ali storitve enake (17/01/2012, T522/10, Hell, EU:T:2012:9, § 36).
Temporary accommodation (earlier right, Class 43) includes youth hostel services (contested mark, Class 43). 
Začasna nastanitev (prejšnja pravica, razred 43) vključuje storitve mladinskih hotelov (izpodbijana blagovna znamka, razred 43).
Therefore, the services are identical. 
Zato sta storitvi enaki.
Pasta (earlier right, Class 30) includes spaghetti (contested mark, Class 30). 
Testenine (prejšnja pravica, razred 30) vključuje špagete (izpodbijana blagovna znamka, razred 30).
The conflicting goods are considered identical. 
Nasprotujoče si blago se šteje za enako.
2.3.2 The contested mark includes the goods/services of the earlier mark 
Izpodbijana znamka vključuje blago ali storitve prejšnje znamke.
If the goods/services designated in the earlier mark are covered by a general indication or broad category used in the contested mark, these goods/services must be considered identical since the Office cannot dissect ex officio the broad category of the applicant's/holder's goods/services (07/09/2006, T133/05, Pam-Pim's Baby-Prop, EU:T:2006:247, § 29). 
Če so blago ali storitve, ki jih označuje prejšnja znamka, vključene v splošno označbo ali širšo kategorijo, uporabljeno v izpodbijani znamki, je treba to blago ali storitve šteti za enake, ker Urad po uradni dolžnosti ne sme razčleniti širše kategorije prijaviteljevega/imetnikovega blaga ali storitev (07/09/2006, T133/05, Pam-Pim's Baby-Prop, EU:T:2006:247, § 29).
The earlier mark's jeans (Class 25) are included in articles of clothing (contested mark, Class 25). 
Denim kavbojke iz prejšnje blagovne znamke (razred 25) so vključene v oblačila (izpodbijana blagovna znamka, razred 25).
The goods are considered identical. 
Blago se šteje za enako.
The earlier mark's bicycles (Class 12) are included in vehicles (contested mark, Class 12). 
Kolesa iz prejšnje blagovne znamke (razred 12) so vključena v vozila (izpodbijana blagovna znamka, razred 12).
The applicant/holder may, however, restrict the list of goods/services in a way that excludes identity, but could still lead to similarity (24/05/2011, T161/10, E-Plex, EU:T:2011:244, § 22). 
Prijavitelj/imetnik lahko omeji seznam blaga ali storitev tako, da izključi enakost, vendar bi to lahko še vedno vodilo v podobnost (24/05/2011, T161/10, E-Plex, EU:T:2011:244, § 22).
The earlier mark's jeans (Class 25) are included in articles of clothing (Class 25). 
Denim kavbojke iz prejšnje znamke (razred 25) so vključene v oblačila (razred 25).
The applicant/holder restricts the specification to articles of clothing, excluding jeans. 
Prijavitelj/imetnik omeji specifikacijo na oblačila, razen denim kavbojk.
The goods are no longer identical but remain similar. 
Blago ni več enako, je pa še vedno podobno.
The earlier mark's bicycles (Class 12) are included in vehicles (contested mark, Class 12). 
Kolesa iz prejšnje znamke (razred 12) so vključena v vozila (izpodbijana znamka, razred 12).
The applicant/holder restricts the specification to vehicles, namely automobiles. 
Prijavitelj/imetnik omeji specifikacijo na vozila, in sicer avtomobili.
The goods are no longer identical or similar. 
Blago ni več enako ali podobno.
If the applicant/holder does not restrict the list of goods/services, or does not do so sufficiently, the Office will treat the contested mark's general indication or broad term/category as a single unit and find identity. 
Če prijavitelj/imetnik ne omeji seznama blaga ali storitev oziroma ga ne omeji dovolj, bo Urad obravnaval splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo izpodbijane znamke kot eno enoto in ugotovil enakost.
If the contested mark covers a general indication or a broad term/category as well as specific items that fall under that general indication or broad term/category, all of these will need to be compared with the specific earlier goods/services. 
Če izpodbijana znamka zajema splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo in specifično blago ali storitve, ki spadajo pod to splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo, je vse to treba primerjati s specifičnim prejšnjim blagom ali storitvami.
The result of identity found with the general indication or broad term/category does not automatically extend to the specific items. 
Enakost, ugotovljena s splošno označbo ali širšim izrazom/kategorijo, se ne razširi samodejno na specifično blago ali storitve.
The contested mark covers vehicles (general indication) as well as bicycles, aircraft, trains (included in vehicles). 
Izpodbijana znamka vključuje vozila (splošna označba) ter kolesa, zračna vozila, vlake (vključene v vozila).
Where the earlier mark is protected for bicycles, identity will be found with respect to vehicles and to bicycles but not for aircraft or trains. 
Če je prejšnja znamka zaščitena za kolesa, se bo enakost ugotovila v zvezi z vozili in kolesi, ne pa za zračna vozila ali vlake.
However, if the contested mark covers a general indication or broad term/category and specific terms that are not listed independently but only as examples, the comparison differs insofar as only the general indication or broad term/category has to be compared. 
Če pa izpodbijana znamka vključuje splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo in posebne izraze, ki niso navedeni samostojno, temveč samo kot primeri, se primerjava razlikuje, saj je treba primerjati samo splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo.
The contested mark covers vehicles, in particular bicycles, aircraft, trains. 
Izpodbijana znamka vključuje vozila, zlasti kolesa, zračna vozila, vlake.
The earlier mark is protected for bicycles. 
Prejšnja znamka je zaščitena za kolesa.
The goods in conflict are considered identical. 
Nasprotujoče si blago se šteje za enako.
The applicant/holder can avoid this result by deleting the general indication vehicles, the expression in particular, and the specific category bicycles. 
Prijavitelj/imetnik se lahko temu rezultatu izogne tako, da črta splošno označbo vozila, izraz zlasti in posebno kategorijo kolesa.
Where the list of goods and/or services of the contested mark reads: vehicles, namely bicycles, aircraft, trains, the comparison differs insofar as only the specific items have to be compared. 
Če se seznam blaga in/ali storitev izpodbijane znamke glasi: vozila, in sicer kolesa, zračna vozila, vlaki, se primerjava razlikuje, saj je treba primerjati samo specifično blago ali storitve.
In this case only the contested bicycles are identical to the earlier goods. 
V tem primeru so le izpodbijana kolesa enaka prejšnjemu blagu.
2.4 Overlap 
Prekrivanje
If two categories of goods/services coincide partially (‘overlap') there might be identity if: 
Če se dve kategoriji blaga ali storitev delno ujemata („prekrivata“), enakost lahko obstaja, če:
they are classified in the same class; 
sta uvrščeni v isti razred;
it is impossible to clearly separate the two goods/services. 
če ni mogoča jasna ločitev obeh vrst blaga ali storitev.
In such cases, it is impossible for the Office to filter these goods from the abovementioned categories. 
Urad v takšnih primerih tega blaga ne more izključiti iz zgoraj navedenih kategorij.
Since the Office cannot dissect ex officio the broad category of the applicant's/holder's goods, they are considered to be identical. 
Ker Urad po uradni dolžnosti ne more razčleniti širše kategorije prijaviteljevega/imetnikovega blaga, se to šteje za enako.
In the fifth example given above, the outcome changes, of course, if soap is limited to soaps for personal use. 
V petem zgoraj navedenem primeru se izid seveda spremeni, če je milo omejeno na mila za osebno uporabo.
In this case the goods are no longer included in the heading cleaning preparations in Class 3 since the latter are only for household use. 
Blago v tem primeru ni več vključeno v naslov čistilni pripravki za gospodinjske namene v razredu 3, ker so ti samo za uporabo v gospodinjstvu.
2.5 Practice on the use of general indications of the class headings 
Praksa na področju uporabe splošnih označb naslovov razredov
According to Article 33(3) EUTMR, the Office does not object to the use of any of the general indications of the class headings provided that this identification is sufficiently clear and precise . 
Urad v skladu s členom 33(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne nasprotuje uporabi katere koli splošne označbe iz naslovov razredov, če je ta opredelitev dovolj jasna in natančna.
[3: See the ‘Common Communication on the Common Practice on the General Indications of the Nice Class Headings'.] 
[3: Glej Skupno sporočilo o skupni praksi pri splošnih označbah naslovov razredov Nicejske klasifikacije.]
According to Article 33(5) EUTMR, the use of general terms or general indications of the class headings will be interpreted as including all the goods or services clearly covered by the literal meaning of the indication or term. 
Če se v skladu s členom 33(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uporabijo splošni izrazi ali splošne označbe iz naslovov razredov, se razlagajo, kot da vključujejo vse blago ali storitve, ki so jasno zajete z dobesednim pomenom označbe ali izraza.
The use of such terms will not be interpreted as comprising a claim to goods or services that cannot be so understood. 
Uporaba takšnih izrazov se ne razlaga, kot da vključujejo zahtevo za blago ali storitve, ki jih ni mogoče tako razumeti.
Under Article 33(8) EUTMR, during the 6-month period ending on 24/09/2016, proprietors of European Union trade marks filed before 22/06/2012 and registered for the entire heading of a Nice class had the opportunity to declare that their intention at the time of filing had been to cover goods and services going beyond the literal meaning of that class heading, provided that the goods or services declared were included in the alphabetical list for the class of the edition of the Nice Classification in force on the date of filing. 
V skladu s členom 33(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU so imetniki blagovnih znamk EU, za katere je bila prijava vložena pred 22. junijem 2012 in so registrirane za celoten naslov razreda Nicejske klasifikacije, v šestmesečnem obdobju, ki se je končalo 24. septembra 2016, lahko izjavili, da je bil njihov namen na dan vložitve zahtevati varstvo za blago ali storitve v širšem pomenu blaga in storitev, zajetih v dobesednem pomenu naslova zadevnega razreda, če so bili prijavljeno blago ali storitve vključeni v abecedni seznam tega razreda izdaje Nicejske klasifikacije, ki je veljala na dan vložitve.
According to Article 33(8) EUTMR, last sentence, from the expiry of the 6-month period following the entry into force of the Amending Regulation, all European Union trade marks registered in respect of the entire heading of a Nice class for which no declaration has been filed, will be deemed to extend only to goods or services clearly covered by the literal meaning of the indications included in the heading of the relevant class. 
V skladu z zadnjim stavkom člena 33(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU po izteku šestmesečnega obdobja po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) 2015/2424 za vse blagovne znamke EU, registrirane za celoten naslov razreda Nicejske klasifikacije in za katere ni predložena nobena izjava, velja, da zajemajo le blago ali storitve, ki so jasno zajete v dobesednem pomenu označb, vključenih v naslov zadevnega razreda.
Declarations for European Union trade marks filed within the relevant period will take effect from the moment of their entry in the Register. 
Izjave za blagovne znamke Evropske unije, vložene v zadevnem obdobju, bodo začele veljati od trenutka njihovega vpisa v register.
Where the declaration is accepted and the Register is amended, Article 33(9) EUTMR will apply. 
Če je izjava sprejeta in se register spremeni, se bo uporabljal člen 33(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
According to Article 33(9) EUTMR, the amendment of a list of goods or services recorded in the Register following a declaration under Article 33(8) EUTMR made during the 6-month period after the entry into force of the Regulation, cannot give the proprietor of a European Union trade mark the right to oppose or to apply for a declaration of invalidity in respect of a later mark where and to the extent that (i) the later trade mark was in use for, or an application had been made to register the later trade mark for, goods or services before the Register was amended for the earlier mark and (ii) the use in relation to those goods or services did not infringe, or would not have infringed, the proprietor's rights based on the literal meaning of the record of the goods or services in the Register at that time. 
Člen 33(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določa, da sprememba seznama blaga ali storitev, vpisanih v register po izjavi na podlagi člena 33(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, podani v šestmesečnem obdobju po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe, imetniku blagovne znamke Evropske unije ne daje pravice, da nasprotuje ali zahteva ugotovitev ničnosti poznejše blagovne znamke, če in kolikor (i) se je poznejša blagovna znamka bodisi že uporabljala ali je bila prijava za registracijo poznejše blagovne znamke za blago ali storitve vložena pred spremembo registra za prejšnjo znamko in (ii z uporabo blagovne znamke v zvezi s tem blagom ali storitvami niso bile kršene ali se ne bi kršile pravice imetnika na podlagi dobesednega pomena blaga in storitev, ki so bili v tistem času vpisani v registru.
In practice, this means that, where the earlier mark is a European Union trade mark and the contested mark was filed, or was in use, before the Register was amended under Article 33(8) EUTMR for the earlier European Union trade mark, the goods and services identified as going beyond the literal meaning of the class heading will not be taken into account in oppositions or declarations of invalidity filed after the entry into force of the Amending Regulation. 
V praksi to pomeni, da če je prejšnja blagovna znamka blagovna znamka Evropske unije in je bila prijava izpodbijane blagovne znamke vložena oziroma se je izpodbijana blagovna znamka uporabljala pred spremembo registra v skladu s členom 33(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU za prejšnjo blagovno znamko Evropske unije, se blago in storitve, ki presegajo dobesedni pomen naslova zadevnega razreda, ne bodo upoštevali pri ugovorih ali zahtevah za ugotovitev ničnosti, vloženih po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) 2015/2424.
As regards the scope of protection of national marks, the Office and all national trade mark offices of the European Union issued a Common Communication on the implementation of the IP Translator judgment. 
Kar zadeva obseg varstva nacionalnih blagovnih znamk, so Urad in vsi nacionalni uradi za blagovne znamke v Evropski uniji izdali skupno sporočilo o izvajanju sodbe v zadevi IP Translator.
According to that Communication, the Office interprets the scope of protection of national marks containing class headings as follows: 
Urad v skladu z navedenim sporočilom razlaga obseg varstva nacionalnih znamk, ki vključujejo naslove razredov, kot sledi:
Earlier national trade marks filed before the IP Translator judgment: in principle, the Office accepts the filing practice of all national trade mark offices in the European Union. 
Prejšnje nacionalne blagovne znamke, vložene pred objavo sodbe v zadevi IP Translator: Urad načeloma sprejema prakso vlaganja prijav vseh nacionalnih uradov za blagovne znamke v Evropski uniji.
National trade marks filed before the IP Translator judgment have the scope of protection awarded by the national office(s) concerned. 
Nacionalne blagovne znamke, za katere so bile prijave vložene pred objavo sodbe v zadevi IP Translator, imajo obseg varstva, ki (so) jim ga je dodelil(-) zadevni nacionalni urad(-i).
The majority of the national offices interpret the class headings of their marks literally. 
Večina nacionalnih uradov razlaga naslove razredov svojih znamk dobesedno.
For those marks, the Office also interprets the class headings on the basis of the natural and usual meaning of each general indication. 
Tudi Urad naslove razredov za navedene znamke razlaga na podlagi naravnega in običajnega pomena posamezne splošne označbe.
Only eight national trade mark offices do not interpret the class headings of their own marks filed before the IP Translator judgment on the basis of their natural and usual meaning: Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Romania and Finland (see Table 1 of the Common Communication). 
Samo osem nacionalnih uradov za znamke naslovov razredov svojih znamk, za katere so bile prijave vložene pred objavo sodbe v zadevi IP Translator, ne razlaga na podlagi njihovega naravnega in običajnega pomena: Bolgarija, Finska, Grčija, Italija, Latvija, Madžarska, Malta in Romunija (glej preglednico 1 skupnega sporočila).
The Office interprets those national marks as covering the class headings plus the alphabetical list of the Nice edition at the time of filing (even if the national office interprets the class heading as covering all goods and services in the class). 
Urad navedene nacionalne znamke razlaga kot znamke, ki vključujejo naslove razredov in abecedni seznam izdaje Nicejske klasifikacije, kot je veljala ob vložitvi prijave (tudi če nacionalni Urad razlaga, da naslov razreda zajema vse blago in storitve iz razreda).
Earlier national marks filed after the IP Translator judgment: the Office interprets all goods and services covered by the national marks on the basis of their natural and usual meaning (see Table 5 of the Common Communication). 
Prejšnje nacionalne znamke, vložene po objavi sodbe v zadevi IP Translator: Urad vse blago in storitve, ki so zajeti z nacionalnimi znamkami, razlaga na podlagi njihovega naravnega in običajnega pomena (glej preglednico 5 skupnega sporočila).
In order to determine the scope of protection the abovementioned principles have to be applied. 
Obseg varstva je treba določiti v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi načeli.
Only those goods or services deemed to be covered following these principles will be considered when comparing the goods/services. 
Pri primerjavi blaga ali storitev bo treba upoštevati samo blago ali storitve, za katere se šteje, da so zajete v skladu z navedenimi načeli.
3 Similarity of Goods and Services 
Podobnost blaga in storitev
3.1 General principles 
Splošna načela
3.1.1 Similarity factors 
Dejavniki podobnosti
Generally speaking, two items are defined as being similar when they have some characteristics in common. 
Na splošno velja, da sta dve vrsti blaga ali storitev opredeljeni kot podobni, če imata nekaj skupnih značilnosti.
The similarity of goods and services does not depend on any specific number of criteria that could be determined in advance and applied in all cases. 
Podobnost blaga in storitev ni odvisna od konkretnega števila meril, ki bi jih bilo mogoče opredeliti vnaprej in uporabljati v vseh primerih.
The similarity of goods and services has been addressed in the case-law of the Court of Justice in Canon (29/09/1998, C39/97, Canon, EU:C:1998:442). 
Podobnost blaga in storitev je bila v sodni praksi Sodišča obravnavana v zadevi Canon (29/09/1998, C39/97, Canon, EU:C:1998:442).
The Court of Justice held that in assessing the similarity of goods all the relevant factors relating to those goods themselves should be taken into account. 
Sodišče je odločilo, da je treba pri presoji podobnosti blaga upoštevati vse upoštevne dejavnike, ki se nanašajo na zadevno blago.
Those factors include, inter alia, their nature, their end users [should read ‘intended purpose'], their method of use and whether they are in competition with each other or are complementary (para. 23). 
Ti dejavniki med drugim vključujejo njegovo naravo, njegove končne uporabnike (kar je treba razumeti kot „predvideni namen“), njegov način uporabe in navedbo, ali je med seboj konkurenčno ali pa se dopolnjuje (točka 23).
The term inter alia shows that the enumeration of the above factors by the Court is only indicative. 
Izraz med drugim kaže, da je seznam zgornjih dejavnikov, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, samo okviren.
There may be other factors in addition to or instead of those mentioned by the Court that may be pertinent, depending on the particular case. 
Poleg dejavnikov, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, in namesto njih morda obstajajo drugi dejavniki, ki so morda pomembni, odvisno od konkretnega primera.
This leads to the conclusion that the following factors should be taken into account: 
Iz tega je mogoče sklepati, da bi bilo treba upoštevati naslednje dejavnike:
Canon factors 
Dejavnik v zadevi Canon:
nature 
narava
intended purpose 
predvideni namen
complementarity 
dopolnjevanje
competition. 
medsebojna konkurenčnost
Additional factors 
Dodatni dejavniki:
distribution channels 
distribucijske poti
relevant public 
upoštevna javnost
the usual origin of the goods/services. 
običajni izvor blaga ali storitev
These factors will be further explained in paragraph 3.2 below; they are also used in the Office's database on the comparison of goods and services. 
Ti dejavniki bodo dodatno pojasnjeni v odstavku 3.2 v nadaljevanju, uporabljajo se tudi v podatkovni zbirki Urada za primerjavo blaga in storitev.
It should be noted, however, that even though the database is restricted to these eight factors, there might be specific cases where other criteria are relevant. 
Poudariti je treba, da lahko obstajajo posebni primeri, v katerih so ustrezna druga merila, kljub temu da je podatkovna zbirka omejena na teh osem dejavnikov.
3.1.2 Defining relevant factors 
Opredelitev upoštevnih dejavnikov
The comparison should focus on identifying the relevant factors that specifically characterise the goods/services to be compared. 
Pri primerjavi se je treba osredotočiti na opredelitev upoštevnih dejavnikov, posebej značilnih za blago ali storitve, ki se primerjajo.
Therefore, the relevance of a particular factor depends on the respective goods/services to be compared. 
Zato je ustreznost nekega dejavnika odvisna le od nasprotujočega si blaga/storitev.
When comparing skis and ski-boots, it is evident that they do not coincide in their nature or method of use and are not in competition. 
Pri primerjavi smuči in smučarskih čevljev je očitno, da se ne ujemajo po svoji naravi ali načinu uporabe ter da si med seboj niso konkurenčni.
Therefore, the comparison should focus on their purpose, their complementary character, their distribution channels, their usual origin and/or the relevant public. 
Pri primerjavi bi se bilo treba torej osredotočiti na njihov namen, dopolnjevalni značaj, distribucijske poti, običajni izvor in/ali upoštevno javnost.
Therefore, the relevant factors and features characterising a product or a service may be different depending on the goods and services with which they have to be compared. 
Zato so lahko upoštevni dejavniki in značilnosti proizvoda ali storitve različni, odvisno od blaga in storitev, s katerimi jih je treba primerjati.
The following questions could be asked: 
Postaviti je mogoče naslednja vprašanja:
How will the goods/services be used? 
Kako se bodo blago ali storitve uporabljale?
What is their purpose? 
Kaj je njihov namen?
How likely is it that they coincide in producers? 
Kako verjetno je, da imajo istega proizvajalca?
Are they usually found in the same outlet or department store, or in the same section of a supermarket? 
Ali so običajno na voljo v isti trgovini ali veleblagovnici ali na istem oddelku supermarketa?
If the factors cannot already be defined from the wording of the goods/services, information may be derived from dictionary entries. 
Če dejavnikov ni mogoče opredeliti že iz besedila blaga ali storitev, je mogoče informacije poiskati v slovarskih geslih.
However, dictionary entries have to be analysed against commercial realities and in particular taking into account the Nice Classification. 
Vendar je treba slovarska gesla analizirati glede na poslovno stvarnost in zlasti ob upoštevanju Nicejske klasifikacije.