natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The opponents will have to be asked to continue the opposition either as multiple opponents based on the first three earlier trade marks or as multiple opponents based on the first, fourth and fifth earlier trade marks. 
Vložnike ugovora bo treba pozvati, naj navedejo, ali želijo ugovor nadaljevati bodisi kot več vložnikov ugovora na podlagi prvih treh prejšnjih blagovnih znamk bodisi kot več vložnikov ugovora na podlagi prve, četrte in pete prejšnje blagovne znamke.
The opponents will have to be asked to continue the opposition either as multiple opponents A, B and C based on the first and the second earlier trade marks or as multiple opponents A and B based on the first, third, fourth and fifth earlier trade marks. 
Vložnike ugovora bo treba pozvati, naj navedejo, ali želijo ugovor nadaljevati bodisi kot več vložnikov ugovora (osebe A, B in C) na podlagi prve in druge prejšnje blagovne znamke bodisi kot več vložnikov ugovora (osebi A in B) na podlagi prve, tretje, četrte in pete prejšnje blagovne znamke.
Indication of relationships other than co-ownership 
Navedba razmerja, ki ni solastništvo
Where two opponents are mentioned in the notice of opposition, one as owner of the earlier right, and another as licensee (authorised by the owner to file opposition), no objections will be raised if the owner of all earlier rights on which the opposition is based is the same legal or natural person, regardless of how many licensees join it in the case. 
Kadar sta v ugovoru navedena dva vložnika, en kot imetnik prejšnje pravice in drug kot pridobitelj licence (ki ga je za vložitev ugovora pooblastil imetnik), pomisleki ne bodo izraženi, če je imetnik vseh prejšnjih pravic, na katerih temelji ugovor, ista pravna ali fizična oseba, ne glede na to, koliko pridobiteljev licence se ji pridruži v zadevi.
In the following example the opposition is acceptable with A, B and C as multiple opponents. 
V naslednjem primeru je ugovor sprejemljiv z osebami A, B in C kot več vložniki ugovora.
By contrast, in the following case, although B is accepted as a multiple opponent as licensee for earlier mark 1, it cannot be accepted as a multiple opponent as owner of earlier mark 3. 
Nasprotno pa v naslednjem primeru oseba B, čeprav je v vlogi pridobitelja licence za prejšnjo znamko 1 priznana kot eden od več vložnikov ugovora, v vlogi imetnika prejšnje znamke 3 ne more biti priznana kot eden od več vložnikov ugovora.
The Office will ask the opponents to indicate whether they want to continue the opposition with A or with B as an opponent. 
Urad bo vložnike ugovora pozval, naj navedejo, ali želijo ugovor nadaljevati z osebo A ali B kot vložnikom ugovora.
If the opponents do not reply, the opposition is inadmissible. 
Če vložniki ugovora ne odgovorijo, je ugovor nedopusten.
In cases where the opposition is based on earlier registered marks, the most common way of providing evidence of co-ownership is to submit a copy of the registration certificate or an extract from an official database. 
Kadar ugovor temelji na prejšnjih registriranih znamkah, je dokazi o solastništvu najobičajneje predložiti kot kopije potrdila o registraciji ali izpisek iz uradne podatkovne zbirke.
If the opposition is based on several earlier marks/rights but the opponents have already submitted evidence of co-ownership of one earlier registered mark, the opponents will still be required to confirm ownership of the other earlier rights. 
Če ugovor temelji na več prejšnjih znamkah ali pravicah, vendar so vložniki ugovora že predložili dokaze o solastništvu ene prejšnje registrirane znamke, bodo kljub temu pozvani, naj predložijo tudi dokaze o solastništvu drugih prejšnjih pravic.
As at this stage of the opposition proceedings the opponents are not obliged to submit evidence of their earlier marks/rights, a statement confirming their capacity to file an opposition together will be considered sufficient for admissibility purposes. 
Ker vložnikom ugovora na tej stopnji postopka ni treba predložiti dokazov o svojih prejšnjih znamkah ali pravicah, se bo izjava, s katero je potrjena njihova pravica do skupne vložitve ugovora, štela za zadostno za namene dopustnosti.
2.4.2.6 Professional representation 
Poklicno zastopanje
Representative 
Zastopnik
Article 2(2)(h)(ii) and Article 73 EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2)(h)(ii) in člen 73 Delegirane uredbe
Article 2(2)(h)(ii) EUTMDR provides that if the opponent has designated a representative, it must provide the name and business address of the representative in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) EUTMIR. 
Člen 2(2)(h)(ii) Delegirane uredbe določa, da mora vložnik ugovora, če je imenoval zastopnika, v skladu s členom (2)(1)(e) Izvedbene uredbe navesti ime in poslovni naslov zastopnika.
Where there is more than one opponent before the Office a common representative must be appointed. 
Če je vložnikov ugovora v postopku pred Uradom več, je treba imenovati skupnega zastopnika.
If the opponent is from the European Economic Area (EEA) (not obliged to be represented under Article 119 EUTMR), failure to appoint a representative, or failure to indicate the name or business address of the representative, merely has the consequence that the Office will communicate with the opponent directly. 
Če je vložnik ugovora iz Evropskega gospodarskega prostora (zastopnik na podlagi člena 119 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni potreben), je edina posledica, da ni imenoval zastopnika ali da ni navedel imena ali poslovnega naslova zastopnika, ta, da bo Urad komuniciral neposredno z njim.
If the opponent is obliged to be represented under Article 119 EUTMR, failure to appoint a representative, or failure to indicate the name or business address of the representative, constitutes a relative admissibility deficiency. 
Če mora vložnik ugovora imeti zastopnika na podlagi člena 119 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, neimenovanje zastopnika ali opustitev navedbe imena ali poslovnega naslova zastopnika pomeni relativno pomanjkljivost v zvezi z dopustnostjo.
The Office will invite the opponent to appoint a representative and/or to indicate the name and address of the representative, failing which the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible. 
Urad bo vložnika ugovora pozval, naj imenuje zastopnika in/ali navede njegovo ime in naslov, sicer bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
For further details on professional representatives, see the Guidelines, Part A, General rules, Section 5, Professional Representation. 
Za dodatne podrobnosti o poklicnih zastopnikih glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 5: Poklicno zastopanje.
2.4.2.7 Signature 
Podpis
Article 63(1)(a) EUTMDR 
Člen 63(1)(a) Delegirane uredbe
A notice of opposition must be signed by the opponent or, if it is submitted by a representative, by the representative. 
Ugovor mora podpisati vložnik ugovora ali zastopnik, če ga vloži zastopnik.
If a notice of opposition is filed by electronic means, the indication of the name of the sender is deemed equivalent to a signature. 
Če je ugovor vložen elektronsko, se navedba imena pošiljatelja šteje za enakovredno podpisu.
2.4.2.8 Relative admissibility requirements: sanctions 
Relativne zahteve za dopustnost: sankcije
Article 5(5) EUTMDR 
Člen 5(5) Delegirane uredbe
If relative admissibility requirements are missing or not complied with, the opponent or its representative is given 2 months to remedy the deficiency. 
Če relativne zahteve za dopustnost niso izpolnjene, mora vložnik ugovora ali njegov zastopnik pomanjkljivosti odpraviti v dveh mesecih.
This time limit cannot be extended. 
Tega roka ni mogoče podaljšati.
2.4.3 Optional indications 
Neobvezne navedbe
2.4.3.1 Extent of opposition 
Obseg ugovora
Article 2(2)(i) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2)(i) Delegirane uredbe
If the opponent indicates that the opposition is only directed against part of the goods and services of the EUTM application, it must list these goods clearly. 
Če vložnik ugovora navede, da je ugovor usmerjen samo zoper del blaga in storitev prijave blagovne znamke EU, mora jasno navesti to blago.
The extent of the opposition is correctly indicated where the goods are specific goods encompassed by a broader term used in the contested specification (e.g. opposition directed against trousers and the EUTM application is filed for clothing - in this example, the only contested goods are considered to be trousers). 
Obseg ugovora je pravilno naveden, kadar je navedeno blago posebno blago, zajeto s širšim izrazom, uporabljenim v izpodbijanem seznamu (npr. ugovor je usmerjen zoper hlače, prijava blagovne znamke EU pa je vložena za oblačila - v tem primeru se za izpodbijano blago štejejo samo hlače).
However, when the opponent uses ambiguous wording, such as ‘the opposition is directed against all goods similar to …', when the opponent's goods are substituted for applicant's goods, or when any other indication given does not clearly identify the contested goods and services, the opposition will be considered to be directed against all of the goods and services of the opposed mark. 
Kadar pa vložnik ugovora uporabi dvoumno besedilo, kot je „ugovor je usmerjen zoper vse blago, podobno …“, kadar je prijaviteljevo blago nadomeščeno z blagom vložnika ugovora ali kadar je uporabljena navedba, ki ne omogoča jasne opredelitve izpodbijanega blaga in storitev, se bo štelo, da je ugovor usmerjen zoper vse blago in storitve izpodbijane znamke.
Additionally, where the opponent indicates in the opposition form that the opposition is directed against ‘part of the goods and services of the contested mark' but then lists ‘all' of the goods and services in the notice of opposition or in the annexes, the Office will, in order to overcome the contradictory information contained in the notice of opposition, assume that the opposition is directed against ‘all the goods and services'. 
Poleg tega bo Urad zaradi razjasnitve nasprotujočih si informacij v ugovoru, če vložnik ugovora na obrazcu za ugovor navede, da je ugovor usmerjen zoper del blaga in storitev izpodbijane znamke, vendar nato v ugovoru ali prilogah navede vse blago in storitve, domneval, da je ugovor usmerjen zoper vse blago in storitve.
2.4.3.2 Reasoned statement on grounds 
Utemeljena izjava z vzroki
Article 2(4) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(4) Delegirane uredbe
A ‘reasoned statement' means any facts and arguments on which the opposition relies as well as any evidence in support of the opposition. 
„Utemeljena izjava“ pomeni vsa dejstva in navedbe, na katere se ugovor opira, ter vse dokaze v podporo ugovoru.
It is optional when filing an opposition. 
Pri vložitvi ugovora ni obvezna.
It may be included in the opposition, but otherwise may be submitted after expiry of the cooling-off period (Article 7(1) EUTMDR), and concerns the substance, not the admissibility, of the opposition. 
Lahko je vključena v ugovor, v nasprotnem primeru pa se lahko predloži po izteku obdobja za pobotanje (člen 7(1) Delegirane uredbe), vendar se nanaša na vsebino ugovora, ne pa na njegovo dopustnost.
2.5 Notification of the notice of opposition 
Uradno obvestilo o ugovoru
Articles 4, 5, and 6 EUTMDR 
Členi 4, 5 in 6 Delegirane uredbe
Any notice of opposition and any document submitted by the opposing party, as well as any communication addressed to one of the parties by the Office prior to the commencement of the cooling-off period, will be sent by the Office to the other party for information purposes. 
Urad bo vsak ugovor, vsak dokument, ki ga predloži stranka, ki ugovarja, ter vsako sporočilo, ki ga Urad naslovi na eno od strank pred začetkom obdobja za pobotanje, poslal v vednost drugi stranki.
Once the opposition has been found admissible, the Office will send a notification to the parties informing them that the adversarial part of the proceedings are deemed to commence 2 months after receipt of the communication. 
Urad bo po tem, ko se ugovor ugotovi za dopustnega, strankama poslal uradno obvestilo, da se šteje, da se kontradiktorni del postopka začne dva meseca po prejemu zadevnega obvestila.
The notification will also set the time limit for the opponent to present the facts, evidence and arguments in support of its opposition, as well as the time limit for the applicant to submit its observations in reply. 
V uradnem obvestilu bosta določena tudi rok, v katerem lahko vložnik ugovora predloži dejstva, dokaze in navedbe v podporo svojemu ugovoru, in rok, v katerem lahko prijavitelj v odgovor predloži svoje pripombe.
It is important to note that due to different means of communication (e-communication, fax and post) the time limits mentioned in this notification are set according to the ‘slowest' communication channel. 
Pomembno je opozoriti, da so roki, navedeni v tem uradnem obvestilu, zaradi različnih komunikacijskih sredstev (npr. elektronska sporočila, telefaks in pošta) določeni glede na najpočasnejši komunikacijski način.
For example, if one of the parties is notified by e-communication through the official web page of the Office, notification is deemed to have taken place on the fifth calendar day following the day on which the document was created by the Office's systems. 
Na primer, če je ena od strank obveščena z elektronskim sporočilom prek uradne spletne strani Urada, se šteje, da je bila uradno obveščena peti koledarski dan po dnevu, ko je bil dokument ustvarjen v sistemih Urada.
Therefore, if the notification to the other party is sent by fax, this latter party will also be granted the five additional days so that the time limits granted in the notifications coincide. 
Če se torej uradno obvestilo drugi stranki pošlje po telefaksu, bo tudi tej stranki odobrenih pet dodatnih dni, tako da se bodo roki, odobreni v uradnih obvestilih, ujemali.
For more information on communication with the Office, please refer to the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits. 
Za več informacij o komunikaciji z Uradom glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki.
Whenever the opposition is based on an earlier trade mark registered or applied for in colour, the Office will ensure that the applicant receives the colour representation. 
Kadar koli ugovor temelji na prejšnji blagovni znamki, ki je bila registrirana ali prijavljena v barvi, bo Urad zagotovil, da bo prijavitelj prejel barvni prikaz.
In some cases this may require notification by post. 
V nekaterih primerih bo zato treba uradno obvestilo poslati po pošti.
Notification is not carried out before expiry of the opposition period. 
Uradno obvestilo se ne pošlje pred iztekom roka za ugovor.
3 Cooling-off Period 
Obdobje za pobotanje
3.1 Setting the cooling-off period in motion 
Začetek obdobja za pobotanje
Articles 5, 7 and Articles 6(1), 8(2) and (9) EUTMDR 
Člena 5 in 7, člen 6(1) ter člen 8(2) in (9) Delegirane uredbe
When the opposition is found admissible, the Office sends a notification to the parties informing them that the opposition is deemed admissible and that the adversarial part of the proceedings is deemed to commence 2 months after receipt of the notification (a 2-month ‘cooling-off' period is granted before the proceedings officially start, with legal consequences as regards the opposition fees in particular). 
Ko je ugotovljena dopustnost ugovora, Urad strankama pošlje uradno obvestilo, da se ugovor šteje za dopustnega in da se v zvezi s kontradiktornim delom postopka šteje, da se začne dva meseca po prejemu obvestila (pred uradnim začetkom postopka je odobreno dvomesečno obdobje za razmislek z nekaterimi pravnimi posledicami, zlasti v zvezi s pristojbinami za ugovor).
Consequently, the Office is bound by this decision. 
Zato je ta odločba za Urad zavezujoča.
The opponent will be given a time limit of 2 months after expiry of the cooling-off period to submit facts, evidence or arguments, irrespective of whether it has already submitted such facts, evidence or arguments together with the notice of opposition. 
Vložnik ugovora bo imel po izteku obdobja za pobotanje na voljo dva meseca za predložitev dejstev, dokazov ali navedb, in sicer ne glede na to, ali je taka dejstva, dokazi ali navedbe že predložil skupaj z ugovorom.
Within the same time limit, the opponent must also substantiate its earlier right(s). 
V istem roku mora utemeljiti tudi svojo(-e) prejšnjo(-e) pravico(-e).
The request to the opponent is a general invitation to complete the file within the meaning of Article 7 EUTMDR. 
Zahteva za vložnika ugovora je splošni poziv za dopolnitev spisa v smislu člena 7 Delegirane uredbe.
The Office will not indicate the nature and type of the material necessary for completing the file (see expressly Article 8(9), second sentence, EUTMDR). 
Urad ne bo navedel narave niti vrste dokumentov ali dokazov, potrebnih za dopolnitev spisa (glej izrecno drugi stavek člena 8(9) Delegirane uredbe).
Rather, it will be for the opponent to decide what it wishes to submit. 
Vložnik ugovora se bo moral sam odločiti, kaj želi predložiti.
In practice, the time limit for submitting such additional material will be set at 4 months from the date of notification. 
V praksi bo rok za predložitev takih dodatnih dokumentov ali dokazov določen na štiri mesece od datuma uradnega obvestila.
Therefore, opponents should be aware that the time limit for submitting such additional material is not a time limit of 2 months beginning after the cooling-off period has expired, but a time limit of 4 months from the notification. 
Vložniki ugovorov se morajo zato zavedati, da rok za predložitev takih dodatnih dokumentov ali dokazov ni dva meseca po izteku obdobja za pobotanje, ampak štiri mesece od uradnega obvestila.
The applicant will be given an additional time limit of 2 months for replying to the opposition. 
Prijavitelj bo imel na voljo dodatna dva meseca za odgovor na ugovor.
Rather than setting separate 2-month time limits (2 months for the cooling-off period, 2 months for completing the opposition, 2 months for replying), the time limit for replying to the opposition will be set at 6 months from the notification of admissibility (day of the start of the cooling-off period). 
Namesto določitve ločenega dvomesečnega roka (dva meseca za obdobje za pobotanje, dva meseca za dopolnitev ugovora, dva meseca za odgovor) bo rok za odgovor na ugovor določen na šest mesecev od uradnega obvestila o dopustnosti (datum začetka obdobja za pobotanje).
When the opponent completes its opposition any time after notification and before expiry of the 4 months available to it, the additional material will be forwarded to the applicant without any change in the time limit available for responding to the opposition. 
Če vložnik ugovora ugovor dopolni kadar koli po uradnem obvestilu in pred iztekom štirimesečnega roka, ki ga ima na voljo, bodo dodatni dokumenti ali dokazi prijavitelju poslani brez spremembe roka, ki ga ima na voljo za odgovor na ugovor.
However, if the additional material arrives at the Office without sufficient time to forward it to the applicant within the time limit set for the opponent, the additional material will then be forwarded to the applicant together with the setting of a new time limit of 2 months for replying to the opposition. 
Če pa dodatni dokumenti ali dokazi na Urad prispejo tako pozno, da ni dovolj časa, da bi bili prijavitelju poslani v roku, določenem za vložnika ugovora, mu bodo poslani skupaj z določitvijo novega dvomesečnega roka za odgovor na ugovor.
This separately set 2-month time limit will run from the date of receipt of the notification of the additional material in order to ensure that the applicant always has a full 2 months to prepare its reply. 
Ta posebej določeni dvomesečni rok začne teči od datuma prejema uradnega obvestila o dodatnih dokumentih ali dokazih, s čimer se zagotovi, da ima prijavitelj vedno na voljo polna dva meseca za pripravo svojega odgovora.
3.2 Extension of the cooling-off period 
Podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje
Article 146(5) to (7) and (9) EUMTR 
Člen 146(5) do (7) in (9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 6(1) EUTMDR 
Člen 6(1) Delegirane uredbe
The cooling-off period may be extended up to a total of 24 months if both parties submit requests for an extension before the period expires. 
Obdobje za pobotanje se lahko podaljša za največ 24 mesecev, če obe stranki pred iztekom obdobja predložita prošnji za podaljšanje.
The Office will grant an extension of 22 months, irrespective of what length of extension is requested. 
Urad bo podaljšanje odobril za 22 mesecev, ne glede na to, za koliko mesecev je bilo zaprošeno podaljšanje.
It is not possible to circumvent the limitation of the cooling-off period to 24 months by requesting a suspension. 
Štiriindvajsetmesečni omejitvi obdobja za pobotanje se ni mogoče izogniti tako, da se zahteva začasna ustavitev.
Requests can be accepted at this stage but will only have effect once the cooling-off period has expired. 
V tej fazi se zahtevki lahko sprejmejo, vendar bodo učinkovali šele po izteku obdobja za pobotanje.
When the parties invoke ongoing negotiations, the proceedings will not be suspended during the cooling-off period, but a request for such a suspension may be made after expiry of the cooling-off period. 
Če se stranki sklicujeta na pogajanja v teku, postopek ne bo začasno ustavljen v obdobju za pobotanje, zahteva za takšno začasno ustavitev pa se lahko predloži po izteku obdobja za pobotanje.
To extend the cooling-off period the following is necessary. 
Za podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje morajo biti izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
A signed request from both parties. 
podpisana prošnja obeh strank.
This may take the form of either two separate requests or one joint request. 
Ta je lahko bodisi z dvema prošnjama bodisi z eno skupno prošnjo.
It is not necessary to state a reason for the extension. 
Razloga za podaljšanje ni treba navesti,
The request must be in the language of the proceedings. 
prošnja mora biti v jeziku postopka.
Alternatively, the request can be filed in one of the Office languages. 
Druga možnost je, da se prošnja vloži v enem od jezikov Urada.
However, a translation must be filed on the parties' own initiative within 1 month of filing. 
Vendar morata stranki v enem mesecu od vložitve prošnje na svojo pobudo predložiti prevod.
The Office does not send any communication requesting a translation of the request for extension. 
Urad ne bo poslal sporočila, v katerem bi zahteval prevod prošnje za podaljšanje,
The request must be filed before expiry of the cooling-off period. 
prošnja mora biti vložena pred iztekom obdobja za pobotanje.
Any request filed after expiry of the cooling-off period will have to be rejected. 
Prošnja, vložena po tem obdobju, bo zavrnjena.
If one party files the request within but the other after expiry of the cooling-off period, the extension is also to be refused. 
Podaljšanje je treba zavrniti tudi, če ena stranka prošnjo vloži v roku, druga pa po izteku obdobja za pobotanje.
The extension of the cooling-off period must be differentiated from requests for extension of a time limit or a suspension. 
Podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje je treba razlikovati od prošenj za podaljšanje roka ali začasno ustavitev.
In the event that the request for extension is inadmissible because it has been filed late or because the cooling-off period had already been extended, it will be treated as a request for suspension provided that the conditions of such a request are fulfilled. 
Če je prošnja za podaljšanje nedopustna, ker je bila vložena prepozno, ali ker je bilo obdobje za pobotanje že podaljšano, se bo obravnavala kot prošnja za začasno ustavitev, če so izpolnjeni pogoji za tako prošnjo.
The extension is granted for a period of 24 months from the date of the start of the cooling-off period. 
Podaljšanje se odobri za 24 mesecev od datuma začetka obdobja za pobotanje.
This procedure avoids multiple extensions and at the same time leaves the parties maximum freedom to decide when they want to continue with the adversarial stage of the proceedings. 
S tem postopkom se preprečijo večkratna podaljšanja, hkrati pa imata stranki tako največ svobode pri odločitvi, kdaj želita preiti na kontradiktorni del postopka.
Any party can then bring the extended cooling-off period to an end (opt out) by expressly indicating this in writing. 
Katera koli stranka lahko nato podaljšano obdobje za pobotanje konča (izstopi iz postopka), tako da to izrecno pisno navede.