natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Name of colours can be single colour names (e.g. red, green), compound colour names (e.g. navy blue, blood red) or more unusual colour names. 
Imena barv so lahko imena posameznih barv (npr. rdeča, zelena), sestavljena imena barv (npr. mornarsko modra, krvavo rdeča) ali neobičajnejša imena barv.
Among unusual colour names, there are names of objects, gemstones, flowers or similar elements (e.g. magnolia, emerald, amethyst, alabaster) and combination of colour associated with another noun (e.g. flamenco red, crystal pink, vintage rose, Bermuda blue). 
Med neobičajnimi imeni barv so imena predmetov, poldragih kamnov, rož ali podobni elementi (npr. magnolija, smaragd, ametist, alabaster) in kombinacija barve in samostalnika (npr. flamenko rdeča, kristalno rožnata, starinsko rožnata, bermudsko modra).
A sign consisting exclusively of the name of a colour must be objected to under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR when the application claims any goods and services for which the colour can reasonably be perceived by the public as a description of one of its characteristics. 
Za znak, ki je sestavljen izključno iz imena barve, je treba vložiti ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če so v prijavi navedeni katero koli blago in storitve, v zvezi s katerimi lahko javnost barvo razumno zazna kot opis ene od njihovih lastnosti.
For example, the name of the colour BLUE in relation to cheese describes a specific kind of cheese; the colour GREEN describes a specific kind of tea or environmentally friendly services. 
Na primer, ime barve MODRA v zvezi s sirom opisuje posebno vrsto sira, ZELENA pa opisuje posebno vrsto čaja ali okolju prijazne storitve.
The name of the colour BROWN in relation to sugar describes the colour and kind of the sugar. 
Ime barve RJAVA v zvezi s sladkorjem opisuje barvo in vrsto sladkorja.
This rule applies mainly to common colours, for example, primary colours or SILVER and GOLD. 
To pravilo velja predvsem za navadne barve, na primer primarne barve ali SREBRNO in ZLATO.
The following guidelines should generally be applied: 
Načeloma je treba uporabiti naslednje smernice:
where colour is a typical feature of the goods and relevant for consumer choice, such as clothing and motor cars, colour names such as CYAN, EMERALD or APRICOT, which, despite having alternative meanings, are recognised as having a strong connotation with definite colours, and should be objected to. 
Kadar je barva značilna lastnost blaga in je pomembna za potrošnikovo izbiro, na primer pri oblačilih in avtomobilih, se imena barv, kot so ZELENOMODRA, SMARAGDNA ali MARELIČNA, čeprav imajo tudi druge pomene, prepoznajo v močni povezavi z določenimi barvami, zato je zoper njih treba vložiti ugovor.
Where the name of a colour is combined with a reference to a possible texture, sheen or finish: SMOKY GRAY, SANDY BROWN, METALLIC BLUE, MATT GOLD, BRILLIANT BRONZE, etc., and the combination represents a typical feature of the goods and is relevant for the consumer's choice, the sign will be objected to inasmuch as it describes the colour and finish/sheen/texture of the respective goods. 
Kadar je ime barve združeno z možno teksturo, leskom ali apreturo: DIMASTO SIVA, PEŠČENO RJAVA, KOVINSKO MODRA, MAT ZLATA, BRILIJANTNO BRONASTA itd., kombinacija pa predstavlja značilno lastnost blaga in je pomembna za potrošnikovo izbiro, je treba zoper znak vložiti ugovor, ker opisuje barvo in apreturo/lesk/teksturo zadevnega blaga.
When the goods for which protection is sought concern colourants such as paint, ink, dyes or cosmetics (e.g. lipsticks or make-up) the name of a colour may describe the actual colour of the goods, and signs consisting exclusively of a colour should be objected to under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR. 
Kadar se blago, za katero se zahteva varstvo, nanaša na sredstva za barvanje, kot so barve, črnila, barvila, kozmetični izdelki (npr. šminke ali ličila), lahko ime barve opisuje dejansko barvo blaga, za znake, sestavljene izključno iz barve, pa je treba vložiti ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
In these cases, names of colours would not be seen as trade marks but merely as indications of the principal characteristic of the goods. 
V teh primerih se imena barv ne bi zaznala kot blagovne znamke, temveč le kot označbe osnovnih lastnosti blaga.
Where the colour does not have a sufficiently strong colour connotation to overwhelm the other non-colour, the meaning should generally not be objected to if it is unlikely to be perceived as having a colour meaning with respect to the goods or services for which protection is sought (12/12/2013, 7 950 C, Lapislazuli). 
Kadar barva nima dovolj močne povezave z barvo, da bi prevladala nad drugim nebarvnim elementom, se zoper pomen načeloma ne vloži ugovora, če ni verjetno, da bi se zaznala kot pomen glede barve v zvezi z blagom ali storitvami, za katere se zahteva varstvo (12/12/2013, 7 950 C, Lapislazuli).
For instance, words such as FLAMINGO. 
Na primer, besede, kot je FLAMINGO.
Colours in combination with other words may be registrable if the sign as a whole is distinctive: ICE COFFEE, VANILLA ICE and MISTY BLUE. 
Barve v kombinaciji z drugimi besedami se lahko registrirajo, če ima znak kot celota razlikovalni učinek: ICE COFFEE, VANILLA ICE in MISTY BLUE.
Dictionary words that are descriptive of colours but are obscure and unlikely to be used by others can be accepted: LUNA (alchemists' name for silver) and CARNELIAN (an alternative name for CORNELIAN, a red gemstone that is less well known). 
Slovarske besede, ki opisujejo barve, vendar so nejasne in ni verjetno, da bi jih uporabljali drugi, se lahko sprejmejo: LUNA (alkimistično ime za srebro) in CARNELIAN (drugo ime za CORNELIAN, rdeč poldrag kamen, ki je manj znan).
2.10 Names of banks, newspapers/magazines and airports 
Imena bank, časopisov/revij in letališč
In some fields, such as banks, newspapers, magazines and airports, consumers are accustomed to recognising descriptive combinations of terms as badges of origin. 
Potrošniki so na nekaterih področjih, kot so banke, časopisi, revije in letališča, vajeni zaznati opisno kombinacijo izrazov kot označbo izvora.
This is due to the market reality whereby a sign composed of different elements has the capacity to identify a specific entity. 
Razlog za to je tržna stvarnost, v okviru katere je znak, ki je sestavljen iz različnih elementov, zmožen identificirati določen subjekt.
It is the case, for example, of a sign that describes an entity that is the only one to offer the respective goods and/or services. 
Gre na primer za znak, ki opisuje subjekt, ki edini ponuja zadevno blago in/ali storitve.
The following marks were accepted. 
Naslednje znamke so bile sprejete.
Nevertheless, descriptive combinations give rise to an objection when they do not create, at least prima facie, the impression of a clearly identifiable entity. 
Vendar opisne kombinacije privedejo do ugovora, če vsaj na prvi pogled ne ustvarijo vtisa jasno določljivega subjekta.
It is the case when the sign refers to a general category and not a specific unique entity. 
To se zgodi, kadar se znak nanaša na splošno kategorijo, in ne specifični edinstven subjekt.
The following marks were refused. 
Naslednje znamke so bile zavrnjene.
2.11 Names of hotels 
Imena hotelov
In the hotel sector, hotel names are often the combination of the word ‘HOTEL' together with a geographical term (i.e. the name of an island, a city, a country etc.). 
V hotelskem sektorju so imena hotelov pogosto kombinacija besede „HOTEL“ in geografskega izraza (tj. imena otoka, mesta, države itd.).
They usually indicate specific establishments that do not have any link with the geographical term they refer to, since they are not situated in that specific location. 
Običajno označujejo posebne ustanove, ki niso povezane z geografskim izrazom, na katerega se nanašajo, ker niso na tej določeni lokaciji.
Consequently, due to these trade habits, consumers would not perceive expressions such as ‘HOTEL BALI', ‘HOTEL BENIDORM' or ‘HOTEL INGLATERRA' as descriptive indications (describing that the services are provided by a hotel that is situated in that specific location) but rather as badges of origin. 
Potrošniki zaradi teh trgovskih običajev izrazov, kot so „HOTEL BALI“, „HOTEL BENIDORM“ ali „HOTEL INGLATERRA“, ne bi zaznali kot opisne označbe (ki opisujejo, da storitve zagotavlja hotel, ki se nahaja na določeni lokaciji), ampak kot označbo izvora.
Indeed, such expressions are not equivalent to the grammatically correct ones ‘HOTEL IN BALI', ‘HOTEL DE BENIDORM' or ‘HOTEL EN INGLATERRA', which clearly give rise to an objection. 
Ti izrazi niso enakovredni slovnično pravilnim izrazom „HOTEL IN BALI“, „HOTEL DE BENIDORM“ ali „HOTEL EN INGLATERRA“, ki nedvomno privedejo do ugovora.
This is even truer in cases where the hotel name consists of the names of two different cities, (or of two geographical terms in general), for example ‘HOTEL LONDRES SAN SEBASTIAN'. 
To še toliko bolj velja, kadar so imena hotelov sestavljena iz imen dveh različnih mest (ali na splošno dveh geografskih izrazov), na primer „HOTEL LONDRES SAN SEBASTIAN“.
Indeed, in this case the presence of the wording SAN SEBASTIAN (a city in the north of Spain) clearly indicates that ‘HOTEL LONDRES' must be regarded as a fanciful expression. 
V tem primeru bližina besedila SAN SEBASTIAN (mesto na severu Španije) jasno označuje, da je treba izraz „HOTEL LONDRES“ razumeti kot domišljijski izraz.
Therefore, no objection should be raised. 
Zato ni treba vložiti ugovora.
Nevertheless, in those cases where the geographical term precedes the word ‘HOTEL', the situation may change according to the different languages. 
Vendar pa se lahko, kadar geografski izraz stoji pred besedo „HOTEL“, situacija spremeni glede na različne jezike.
For example, in English the wording ‘BALI HOTEL', would be perceived as an expression merely indicating any hotel located in the island of Bali, which clearly gives rise to an objection. 
Na primer, v angleščini bi se besedilo „BALI HOTEL“ zaznalo kot izraz, ki označuje le kateri koli hotel na otoku Baliju, kar nedvomno privede do ugovora.
Consequently, each case should be assessed on its own merits. 
Zato bi bilo treba vsak primer presoditi samostojno.
Finally, descriptive combinations such as ‘LEADING HOTELS' give rise to an objection since they do not create, at least prima facie, the impression of a clearly identifiable entity. 
Nazadnje opisne kombinacije, kot je „LEADING HOTELS“, privedejo do ugovora, ker vsaj na prvi pogled ne ustvarijo vtisa jasno določljivega subjekta.
2.12 Combinations of names of countries/cities with a number indicating a year 
Kombinacije imen držav/mest s številko, ki označuje leto
Marks consisting of the combination of the name of a country/city with a number indicating a year must be refused under Article 7(1)(b) and (c) EUTMR in the following cases. 
Znamke, ki so sestavljene iz kombinacije imena države/mesta in številke, ki označuje leto, je treba zavrniti na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) in (c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v naslednjih primerih.
Firstly, where the combination is perceived by the relevant consumers as describing an event happening that specific year in the designated geographic location, it must be refused for all the goods and services for which protection is sought, since it is considered that the descriptive link applies to any good or service. 
Prvič, kadar zadevni potrošniki kombinacijo zaznajo kot opis dogodka v določenem letu na označeni geografski lokaciji, jo je treba zavrniti za vse blago in storitve, za katere se zahteva varstvo, ker se šteje, da se opisna povezava nanaša na katero koli blago ali storitve.
As an example, the mark ‘GERMANY 2006' was found to be immediately perceived as a reference to an event that would take place in 2006. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se na primer znamka „GERMANY 2006“ takoj zazna kot sklicevanje na dogodek, ki bo leta 2006.
It has been considered as a descriptive indication for a wide list of goods and services, ranging from unexposed films in Class 1 to vehicle maintenance in Class 37. 
Štela se je za opisno označbo obsežnega seznama blaga in storitev, ki segajo od neosvetljenih filmov iz razreda 1 do vzdrževanja vozil iz razreda 37.
In particular, the decision of 30/06/2008 in case R 1467/20051 stated that this mark: 
Zlasti v odločbi z dne 30/06/2008 v zadevi R 1467/20051 je navedeno, da ta znamka:
is descriptive of the kind and content of those services ‘of actually preparing, organising and promoting an event in Germany in 2006' (para. 29, referring to the organisation of sporting events related to or associated with football championships, etc.); 
opisuje vrsto in vsebino storitev „dejanske priprave, organizacije in oglaševanja dogodka v Nemčiji leta 2006“ (točka 29, ki se nanaša na organizacijo športnih dogodkov, ki se nanašajo na nogometna prvenstva ali so povezani z njimi, itd.),
is descriptive of ‘the purpose and thereby in part the level of quality of goods or services, during such competitions in Germany in the year 2006, as being suitable for competitions of the highest standard or that it has been successfully used in the context of such competitions' (para. 30, referring to medical instruments, soccer balls, etc.); 
opisuje „namen in s tem deloma raven kakovosti blaga ali storitev med takšnimi tekmovanji v Nemčiji leta 2006 kot primerne za tekmovanja najvišjega standarda ali da je bila uspešno uporabljena v kontekstu teh tekmovanj“ (točka 30, ki se nanaša na medicinske instrumente, nogometne žoge itd.),
qualifies the goods as souvenir articles (para. 31, referring to goods such as stickers, confetti, pyjamas, etc.). 
označuje blago kot spominke (točka 31, ki se nanaša na blago, kot so nalepke, konfeti, pižame itd.).
With regard to souvenir articles, the Board underlined that ‘merchandising and co-branding is not limited to ‘classic' souvenir products. 
Odbor je glede spominkov poudaril, da „trženje in povezovanje blagovnih znamk nista omejena na ‚klasične‘ spominke“.
It is public knowledge that there is a tendency to try to find new markets by combining various goods with the brand of some other unrelated popular event or names' (30/06/2008, R 1467/20051, GERMANY 2006, § 34, referring to goods such as eyeglasses, televisions, toilet paper, etc., all related to or associated with football championships). 
Znano je, da se poskušajo z združevanjem različnega blaga z znamko drugega nepovezanega popularnega dogodka ali imena najti novi trgi (30/06/2008, R 1467/20051, GERMANY 2006, § 34, ki se nanaša na blago, kot so očala, televizijski sprejemniki, toaletni papir itd., ki se vsi nanašajo na nogometna prvenstva ali so povezani z njimi).
In line with the above, the Boards confirmed the refusal of the trade mark ‘TARRAGONA 2017' for various commemorative articles, such as goods in Class 6 (bronzes (works of art), busts of common metal, crates of metal, bells, placards of metal, etc.) or goods in Class 14 (jewellery ornaments, decorative pins of precious metal, amulets (jewellery), rings (jewellery), bracelets and wrist bands, etc.) (28/10/2016, R 2318/20155, TARRAGONA 2017, § 32). 
Urad je v skladu z zgornjim potrdil zavrnitev blagovne znamke „TARRAGONA 2017“ za različne priložnostne proizvode, kot je blago iz razreda 6 (bronasta umetniška dela, doprsni kipi iz navadnih kovin, zaboji iz kovin, zvonci, panoji iz kovine itd.) ali blago iz razreda 14 (zlatarski izdelki, dekorativne igle iz kovine, amuleti (nakit), zapestnice in zapestni trakovi itd.) (28/10/2016, R 2318/20155, TARRAGONA 2017, § 32).
Secondly, where the combination is not, or not any more, perceived by the relevant consumers as describing an event that happens, or took place, in that specific year in the designated geographic location, a sign combining the name of a country or city with a number indicating a year might still be perceived by the relevant public as an indication of another characteristic, such as the place and time of production or destination. 
Drugič, kadar zadevni potrošniki kombinacije ne zaznajo ali ne zaznajo več kot opis dogodka v nekem letu na označeni geografski lokaciji, lahko upoštevna javnost znak, ki združuje ime države ali mesta in številko, ki označuje leto, še vedno zazna kot označbo druge značilnosti, kot sta kraj in čas proizvodnje ali namembni kraj.
The assessment has to be made in accordance with the criteria explained under paragraph 2.6 above. 
Presojo je treba opraviti v skladu z merili, pojasnjenimi v odstavku 2.6 zgoraj.
2.13 INN codes 
Kode INN
International non-proprietary names (INNs) are assigned to pharmaceutical substances by the World Health Organisation (WHO), so that each substance can be recognised by a unique name. 
Mednarodna nelastniška imena (INN) Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija (SZO) dodeli farmacevtskim snovem, da je mogoče vsako snov prepoznati po edinstvenem imenu.
These names are needed for the clear identification, safe prescription and dispensing of medicines, and for communication and exchange of information among health professionals. 
Ta imena so potrebna za jasno identifikacijo, varno predpisovanje in izdajanje zdravil ter za komunikacijo in izmenjavo informacij med zdravstvenimi delavci.
INNs can be used freely because they are in the public domain. 
Mednarodna nelastniška imena se lahko prosto uporabljajo, ker so javna.
Examples of INNs are alfacalcido, calcifediol, calcipotriol. 
Primeri INN so alfakalcidol, kalcifediol, kalcipotriol.
Stems define the pharmacologically related group to which the INN belongs. 
Koreni opredeljujejo farmakološko povezano skupino, ki ji pripada INN.
INN stems serve to indicate the mode of action of groups of drugs. 
Koreni INN so namenjeni navedbi načina delovanja skupin zdravil.
These stems and their definitions have been selected by WHO experts and are used when selecting new international non-proprietary names. 
Te korene in njihove opredelitve so izbrali strokovnjaki SZO in se uporabljajo pri izbiri novih mednarodnih nelastniških imen.
An example of a stem is ‘calci'. 
Primer korena je „kalci“.
The criteria for assessing the descriptiveness of a trade mark for pharmaceuticals are no different from those applicable to other categories of trade marks. 
Merila za presojanje opisnosti blagovne znamke za farmacevtske proizvode se ne razlikujejo od meril, ki veljajo za druge kategorije blagovnih znamk.
The provisions of trade mark law apply to pharmaceuticals in the same way as to other categories of goods. 
Določbe zakonodaje o blagovnih znamkah se za farmacevtske proizvode uporabljajo enako kot za druge kategorije blaga.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) assesses the single name under which a medicinal product will be marketed as part of its marketing authorisation for the European Union. 
Evropska agencija za zdravila (EMA) presoja o enotnem imenu, pod katerim se zdravilo daje v promet, v okviru dovoljenja za promet z zdravilom za Evropsko unijo.
The EMA's assessment is based on public health concerns and takes into account the WHO World Health Assembly resolution (WHA46.19) on protection of INNs/INN stems to prevent any potential risk of confusion. 
Ocena EMA temelji na tveganjih za javno zdravje in upošteva resolucijo skupščine SZO (WHA46.19) o zaščiti INN/korenov INN za preprečevanje morebitnega tveganja zamenjave.
The Office's assessment of the registrability of pharmaceutical trade marks, however, has no specific legal basis for taking such health-related concerns into consideration (by analogy, 05/04/2006, T202/04, Echinaid, EU:T:2006:106, § 31-32). 
Presoja možnosti registracije farmacevtskih blagovnih znamk, ki jo opravi Urad, pa nima posebne pravne podlage za obravnavanje takih zdravstvenih tveganj (po analogiji glej sodbo z dne 05/04/2006, T202/04, Echinaid, EU:T:2006:106, § 31-32).
Considering the descriptive nature of INN codes and stems, an objection should be raised for Class 5 in the following scenarios: 
Glede na opisni značaj kod in korenov INN bi bilo treba za razred 5 vložiti ugovor v naslednjih primerih:
where the EUTM is an INN (the general rules on misspellings also apply, see paragraph 2.3 above); or 
kadar je blagovna znamka EU INN (veljajo tudi splošna pravila za napačno črkovanje, glej odstavek 2.3 zgoraj), ali
where an INN appears within an EUTM and the other elements of the EUTM are descriptive/non-distinctive too (for instance BIO, PHARMA, CARDIO, MED, DERMA); or 
kadar se INN pojavi v okviru blagovne znamke EU in so drugi elementi blagovne znamke EU prav tako opisni/neopisni (na primer BIO, PHARMA, CARDIO, MED, DERMA), ali
where the EUTM consists only of a stem. 
kadar blagovno znamko EU sestavlja samo koren.
A list of INN codes can be accessed after online registration on MedNet (https://mednet-communities.net). 
Do seznama kod INN je mogoče dostopati po spletni registraciji na platformi MedNet (https://mednet-communities.net).
Office practice is to accept figurative trade marks containing INN codes or stems, applying the same criteria as to any other figurative trade mark containing descriptive word elements (i.e. whether the stylisation and/or the graphical features of a sign are sufficient for it to act as a trade mark). 
Praksa Urada je, da sprejme figurativne blagovne znamke, ki vsebujejo kode ali korene INN, pri tem pa uporabi enaka merila kot za katero koli drugo figurativno blagovno znamko, ki vsebuje opisne besedne elemente (tj. ali stilizirana predstavitev in/ali grafične značilnosti znaka zadostujejo, da ta deluje kot blagovna znamka).
An objection may also be based on Article 7(1)(g) EUTMR in the unlikely scenario that the list of goods in Class 5 refers to a different kind of drug from that covered by the INN. 
Ugovor se lahko vloži tudi na podlagi člena 7(1)(g) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v ne prav verjetnem primeru, da se seznam blaga iz razreda 5 nanaša na drugo vrsto zdravila kot je tisto, ki ga zajema INN.
Where the list in Class 5 includes pharmaceuticals, the Office assumes good faith and no objection under Article 7(1)(g) EUTMR will be raised. 
Če seznam iz razreda 5 vključuje farmacevtske proizvode, Urad domneva dobro vero in se ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(g) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne vloži.
3 Figurative Marks 
Figurativne znamke
By definition (Article 3(3)(b) EUTMIR), marks where non-standard characters, stylisation or layout, or a graphic feature or a colour is used are figurative marks. 
V skladu z opredelitvijo (člen 3(3)(b) Izvedbene uredbe) so znamke, pri katerih se uporabijo nestandardni znaki, stilizacija ali razporeditev znakov ali grafična poteza ali barva, figurativne znamke.
Signs represented in alphabets other than Latin, Greek or Cyrillic are to be considered figurative trade marks. 
Znaki, predstavljeni v abecedah, ki niso latinščina, grščina ali cirilica, se štejejo za figurativne blagovne znamke.
However, this does not mean that the semantic content of these signs will not be taken into consideration for the purpose of the application of Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR. 
Vendar to ne pomeni, da se ne bo upošteval semantični pomen teh znakov za namene uporabe člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Where a figurative mark consists exclusively of a basic natural form that is not significantly different from a true-to-life portrayal that serves to indicate the kind, intended purpose or other characteristic of the goods or services, it should be objected to under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR as descriptive of a characteristic of the goods or services in question. 
Če je figurativna znamka sestavljena izključno iz osnovne naravne oblike, ki se ne razlikuje bistveno od resnične podobe in je namenjena označbi vrste, predvidenega namena ali drugih lastnosti blaga ali storitev, je treba zoper njo vložiti ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ker opisuje lastnost zadevnega blaga ali storitev.
In these cases the Court held that for goods in Classes 18 and 31, the depiction of a dog or horse, respectively, serves to indicate the type of animal for which the goods are intended. 
Sodišče je v navedenih zadevah menilo, da podoba psa ali konja za blago iz razredov 18 in 31 označuje vrsto živali, kateri je blago namenjeno.