natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Consequently, restrictions applied during the proceedings to either the list of goods/services of the application or the goods/services on which the opposition is based, or both, will limit the goods and services to be compared. 
Zato bodo omejitve, uporabljene med postopkom bodisi za seznam blaga ali storitev iz prijave bodisi za blago ali storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor, ali za oboje, omejile blago in storitve, ki jih je treba primerjati.
Furthermore, an analysis of the wording of the list of goods/services might be required to determine the scope of protection of those goods and services. 
Poleg tega je mogoče zahtevati analizo besedila seznama blaga ali storitev, da se določi obseg varstva navedenega blaga in storitev.
This is especially true where terms such as in particular, namely, or equivalents are used in order to show the relationship of an individual product with a broader category. 
To velja zlasti, kadar se uporabljajo izrazi, kot so zlasti, in sicer ali njune ustreznice, da se pokaže na razmerje posameznega proizvoda s širšo kategorijo.
The term in particular (or for example, such as, including or other equivalent) indicates that the specific goods/services are only examples of items included in the category, and that protection is not restricted to them. 
Izraz zlasti (ali na primer, kot je, vključno ali druga ustreznica) kaže na to, da so določeno blago ali storitve samo primeri proizvodov in storitev, vključenih v kategorijo, in da varstvo ni omejeno nanje.
In other words, it introduces a non-exhaustive list of examples (on the use of in particular, see the reference in 09/04/2003, T224/01, Nu-Tride, EU:T:2003:107). 
Z drugimi besedami, navedeni izraz uvaja neizčrpen seznam primerov (o uporabi izraza zlasti glej sodbo 09/04/2003, T224/01, Nu-Tride, EU:T:2003:107).
However, the term namely (or exclusively or other equivalent) is exclusive and restricts the scope of the registration to only the specifically listed goods. 
Vendar je izraz in sicer (ali izključno ali druga ustreznica) izključen in obseg registracije omejuje samo na posebej navedeno blago.
For example, in the case of chemicals used in industry, namely raw materials for plastics only the raw materials for plastics need to be compared with the goods of the other mark. 
Na primer, v primeru kemikalije, ki se uporabljajo v industriji, in sicer surovine za proizvodnjo plastike je treba z blagom druge znamke primerjati samo surovine za proizvodnjo plastike.
The use of commas in the list of goods/services serves to separate items within the same or a similar category. 
Vejice se v seznamu blaga ali storitev uporabljajo za ločevanje blaga in storitev v okviru iste ali podobne kategorije.
The use of a semicolon means a separation between terms. 
Uporaba podpičja pomeni ločevanje med izrazi.
The separation of terms by different punctuation can lead to changes in their meaning and may lead to a different assessment when comparing the goods/services. 
Ločevanje izrazov z različnimi ločili lahko spremeni njihov pomen in povzroči drugačno presojo pri primerjavi blaga ali storitev.
For more information on punctuation in lists of goods and services, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 3, Classification. 
Za več informacij o ločilih v seznamih blaga in storitev glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 3: Razvrstitev.
For example, in computer software for use with industrial machines; fire extinguishers in Class 9, the inclusion of a semicolon means that the term fire extinguishers must be considered as an independent category of goods, regardless of whether the intention was to protect computer software to be used in the field of industrial machines and fire extinguishers. 
Na primer, vključitev podpičja v primeru računalniška programska oprema za uporabo z industrijskimi stroji; gasilni aparati v razredu 9 pomeni, da je treba izraz gasilni aparati obravnavati kot neodvisno kategorijo blaga, ne glede na to, ali je bil namen zaščititi računalniško programsko opremo za uporabo na področju industrijskih strojev in gasilnih aparatov.
An analysis of the wording of the list of goods/services is also required where the wording used is not sufficiently clear and precise to enable the competent authorities and economic operators, on that sole basis, to determine the scope of protection, and, consequently, to enable the Office to carry out a proper comparison of those goods and services. 
Analiza besedila seznama blaga ali storitev je potrebna tudi, kadar uporabljeno besedilo ni dovolj jasno in natančno, da bi lahko pristojni organi in gospodarski subjekti že na navedeni podlagi določili obseg varstva ter, posledično, da bi lahko Urad opravil ustrezno primerjavo tega blaga in storitev.
In such cases the Office will first verify whether goods or services are considered to be unclear or imprecise due to an incorrect translation of the original list. 
Urad bo v takih primerih najprej preveril, ali se zaradi nepravilnega prevoda prvotnega seznama šteje, da so blago ali storitve nejasne ali nenatančne.
If so, the Office will take different steps depending on whether the unclear or imprecise term is contained in the specification of the EUTM (regardless of whether the EUTM (or EUTM application) is the earlier right or the contested application) or of the national or international mark on which the opposition is based. 
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, bo Urad ukrepal različno, odvisno od tega, ali je nejasen ali nenatančen izraz vključen v podrobno opredelitev blagovne znamke EU (ne glede na to, ali je blagovna znamka EU (ali prijava blagovne znamke EU) prejšnja pravica ali izpodbijana prijava) ali nacionalne ali mednarodne znamke, na kateri temelji ugovor.
The provisions contained in paragraphs 1.5.1.1 and 1.5.1.2 above apply. 
Uporabljajo se določbe iz odstavkov 1.5.1.1 in 1.5.1.2 zgoraj.
If the lack of clarity and precision is not the result of an incorrect translation but the term is unclear or imprecise in itself, and it prevents the Office from carrying out a proper comparison of the goods and services, then, in the absence of a limitation enabling the Office to clearly determine the exact scope of protection of the vague term, different steps must be taken depending on whether the unclear or imprecise term is contained in the contested mark or the earlier mark. 
Če nejasnost in nenatančnost nista rezultat napačnega prevoda, temveč je izraz nejasen ali nenatančen sam po sebi in Uradu onemogoča izvedbo ustrezne primerjave blaga in storitev, je treba zato - če ni omejitve, ki bi Uradu omogočila, da jasno opredeli natančen obseg varstva nejasnega izraza - sprejeti različne ukrepe, odvisno od tega, ali je nejasen ali nenatančen izraz vključen v izpodbijano znamko ali prejšnjo znamko.
Unclear or imprecise term(s) in the list of goods/services covered by the contested mark 
Nejasni ali nenatančni izrazi v seznamu blaga ali storitev, zajetih z izpodbijano znamko
Where the contested mark contains a vague term that prevents the Office from carrying out a comparison of goods and services, the Office will reopen examination of the classification of the mark under Article 33 EUTMR and suspend the opposition proceedings accordingly (27/02/2014, T229/12, Vogue, EU:T:2014:95, § 55). 
Če izpodbijana znamka vključuje nejasen izraz, ki Uradu onemogoča izvedbo primerjave blaga in storitev, bo Urad znova začel preizkus razvrstitve znamke v skladu s členom 33 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in posledično začasno ustaviti postopek ugovora (27/02/2014, T229/12, Vogue, EU:T:2014:95, § 55).
Unclear or imprecise term(s) in the list of goods and services covered by the earlier mark 
Nejasni ali nenatančni izrazi v seznamu blaga ali storitev, zajetih s prejšnjo znamko
Where the Office is unable to clearly determine the exact scope of protection of vague terms, the vagueness of the wording is not a sufficient basis in itself for arguing in support of identity or similarity. 
Če Urad ne more jasno opredeliti natančnega obsega varstva nejasnih izrazov, nejasnost besedila sama po sebi ni zadostna podlaga za argumente v podporo enakosti ali podobnosti.
Vague terms may only be taken into account in their most natural and literal meaning and may not be construed as relating to goods, qualities, properties, methods of use, etc. to which that term is not expressly limited (14/07/2003, R 559/20024, MOBILIX / OBELIX, §17; 02/02/2015, R 391/20144 POWERMATIC / POWRMATIC et al., § 29, 33). 
Nejasne izraze je mogoče upoštevati le v njihovem najnaravnejšem in najbolj dobesednem pomenu, pri čemer se ne smejo razlagati, kot da se nanašajo na blago, značilnosti, lastnosti, načine uporabe itd., na katere navedeni izraz ni izrecno omejen (14/07/2003, R 559/20024, MOBILIX / OBELIX, §17; 02/02/2015, R 391/20144 POWERMATIC / POWRMATIC et al., § 29, 33).
Nor may the vague term be interpreted in relation to other goods or services within the same class or different classes. 
Poleg tega nejasnega izraza ni mogoče razlagati v zvezi z drugim blagom ali storitvami v istem razredu ali različnih razredih.
For example, when comparing the vague term machines to dual combustion machines for use in agriculture, the vagueness of the term cannot be used on its own for arguing similarity; nor can the term be construed as relating to ‘dual combustion' machines or to machines ‘for use in agriculture' when such qualities and methods of use have not been expressly identified in the specification. 
Na primer, če se nejasen izraz stroji primerja z izrazom kmetijski stroji z dvojnim izgorevanjem, se nejasnost izraza sama po sebi ne more uporabiti za trditev o podobnosti; poleg tega se izraz ne sme razlagati, kot da se nanaša na stroje „z dvojnim izgorevanjem“ ali „za uporabo v kmetijstvu“, če takšne značilnosti in načini uporabe niso izrecno opredeljeni v specifikaciji.
Likewise, when comparing a vague term such as giftware of all kinds, such a wide formulation cannot be used by the opponent to argue that the retail of these goods is similar to all kinds of goods in the contested mark, when the opponent could have easily specified the kind of giftware offered for sale. 
Podobno, kadar se primerja nejasen izraz darila vseh vrst, vložnik ugovora ne more uporabiti tako široke ubeseditve za zatrjevanje, da je prodaja tega blaga na drobno podobna vsem vrstam blaga, zajetega z izpodbijano blagovno znamko, ko pa bi lahko vložnik ugovora zlahka podrobno opredelil vrsto daril, ki so na prodaj.
In these cases, the comparison will be done on a case-by-case basis. 
V takih primer bo primerjava opravljena za vsak primer posebej.
Further examples of general indications and terms and expressions lacking clarity and precision can be found in the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 3, Classification, paragraph 4.2. 
Več primerov splošnih označb ter nejasnih in nenatančnih izrazov je na voljo v Smernicah, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 3: Razvrstitev, odstavek 4.2.
1.5.3 The meaning of goods/services 
Pomen blaga ali storitev
Once the wording of the goods and services to be considered has been identified, its meaning must be determined. 
Potem ko je bilo določeno ustrezno besedilo blaga in storitev, ki jih je treba proučiti, je treba določiti njegov pomen.
In some cases, the exact meaning is immediately obvious from the list of goods and/or services of the marks, where a more or less detailed description of the goods and services will often be given. 
V nekaterih primerih je točen pomen takoj očiten iz seznama blaga in/ali storitev znamk, pri katerih je pogosto naveden bolj ali manj podroben opis blaga in storitev.
For example, the wording belts, being articles of clothing excludes by definition safety or industrial belts. 
Na primer, besedilo pasovi kot oblačila po definiciji izključuje varnostne ali industrijske pasove.
In cases of doubt about the exact meaning of the terms used in the list of goods and/or services, the terms have to be interpreted both in the light of the Nice Classification and from a commercial perspective. 
V primeru dvoma glede točnega pomena izrazov, uporabljenih v seznamu blaga in/ali storitev, je treba izraze razlagati v skladu z Nicejsko klasifikacijo in s poslovnega vidika.
Therefore, belts in Class 25 are, due to their classification, articles of clothing. 
Zato so pasovi v razredu 25 zaradi svoje razvrstitve oblačila.
Where the meanings of terms in a semantic context, a commercial context and/or under the Nice Classification are ambiguous or leave doubts, the meaning they have under the Nice Classification prevails. 
Če je pomen izrazov v semantičnem smislu, poslovnem smislu in/ali v skladu z Nicejsko klasifikacijo nejasen ali dvoumen, prevlada njihov pomen v skladu z Nicejsko klasifikacijo.
However, this does not mean that two general indications in one class heading can never be considered identical. 
Vendar to ne pomeni, da dve splošni označbi iz naslova enega razreda nikoli ni mogoče šteti za enaki.
As mentioned above, the structure of the class headings is not uniform. 
Kot je bilo že omenjeno, struktura naslovov razredov ni enotna.
Some general indications included in the class headings may encompass others. 
Nekatere splošne označbe, vključene v naslove razredov, lahko vključujejo druge.
Meat and poultry are identical (Class 29). 
Meso in perutnina sta enaka (razred 29).
1.6 Objective approach 
Nepristranski pristop
The comparison of the goods/services in question must be made without taking into account the degree of similarity of the conflicting signs or the distinctiveness of the earlier mark. 
Primerjavo zadevnega blaga ali storitev je treba opraviti brez upoštevanja stopnje podobnosti nasprotujočih si znakov ali razlikovalnega učinka prejšnje znamke.
It is only in the overall assessment of a decision that the examiners will take into account all the relevant factors. 
Preizkuševalci bodo vse upoštevne dejavnike upoštevali samo v celoviti presoji odločbe.
The classification of the goods or services is not conclusive, because similar goods/services may be classified in different classes, whereas dissimilar goods/services may fall within the same class. 
Klasifikacija blaga ali storitev ni dokončna, ker so lahko podobno blago ali storitve uvrščene v različne razrede, različno blago ali storitve pa lahko spadajo v isti razred.
Identity or similarity of the goods/services in question must be determined on an objective basis. 
Enakost ali podobnost zadevnega blaga ali storitev je treba določiti na nepristranski podlagi.
It is necessary to base the findings on the realities of the marketplace, such as established customs in the relevant field of industry or commerce. 
Ugotovitve je treba utemeljiti na dejanskem stanju na trgu, na primer ob upoštevanju navad in običajev na zadevnem področju industrije ali trgovine.
These customs, especially trade practices, are dynamic and constantly changing. 
Te navade in običaji, zlasti poslovne prakse, so dinamični in se nenehno spreminjajo.
For instance, mobile phones nowadays combine many functions, such as being communication tools as well as photographic apparatus. 
Na primer, danes mobilni telefoni združujejo več funkcij, so komunikacijsko orodje in fotografski aparat.
The degree of similarity of the goods and services is a matter of law, which must be assessed ex officio by the Office even if the parties do not comment on it (16/01/2007, T53/05, Calvo, EU:T:2007:7, § 59). 
Stopnja podobnosti blaga in storitev je vprašanje prava, ki jo mora Urad proučiti po uradni dolžnosti, tudi če stranki ne predložita pripomb o njej (16/01/2007, T53/05, Calvo, EU:T:2007:7, § 59).
However, the Office's ex officio examination is restricted to well-known facts, that is to say, ‘facts which are likely to be known by anyone or which may be learned from generally accessible sources', which excludes facts of a highly technical nature (03/07/2013, T106/12, Alpharen, EU:T:2013:340, § 51). 
Vendar je preizkus, ki ga Urad opravi po uradni dolžnosti, omejen na splošno znana dejstva, to je „dejstva, ki jih lahko pozna vsak in jih je mogoče dobiti iz splošno dostopnih virov“, kar izključuje zelo tehnična dejstva (03/07/2013, T106/12, Alpharen, EU:T:2013:340, § 51).
Consequently, what does not follow from the evidence/arguments submitted by the parties or is not commonly known should not be speculated on or extensively investigated ex officio (09/02/2011, T222/09, Alpharen, EU:T:2011:36, § 31-32). 
Zato se o tistem, kar ne izhaja iz dokazil/argumentov, ki so jih predložile stranke, ali kar ni splošno znano, ne smejo oblikovati domneve oziroma se to ne sme obširno preiskovati po uradni dolžnosti (09/02/2011, T222/09, Alpharen, EU:T:2011:36, § 31-32).
1.7 Statement of reasons 
Obrazložitev
The examiner is required to state reasons for the outcome of the comparison (identity, similarity or dissimilarity) for each of the individual goods and services specified in the application for registration. 
Preizkuševalec mora obrazložiti izid primerjave (enakost, podobnost ali različnost) za vsako posamezno blago in storitev iz prijave za registracijo.
However, the examiner may use only general reasoning for groups of the goods or services concerned as long as the goods or services present analogous characteristics (see, by analogy, 18/03/2010, C282/09 P, P@yweb card / Payweb card, EU:C:2010:153, § 37-38; 12/04/2011, T28/10, Euro automatic Payment, EU:T:2011:158, § 54; 17/10/2013, C597/12 P, Zebexir, EU:C:2013:672, § 26-27). 
Vendar lahko preizkuševalec za vse zadevno blago ali storitve uporabi samo splošno obrazložitev, če imajo to blago ali storitve podobne značilnosti (glej po analogiji sodbe 18/03/2010, C282/09 P, P@yweb card / Payweb card, EU:C:2010:153, § 37-38; 12/04/2011, T28/10, Euro automatic Payment, EU:T:2011:158, § 54; 17/10/2013, C597/12 P, Zebexir, EU:C:2013:672, § 26-27).
2 Identity 
Enakost
2.1 General principles 
Splošna načela
Identity is generally defined as ‘the quality or condition of being the same in substance, composition, nature, properties, or in particular qualities under consideration' (Oxford Dictionaries online edition). 
Enakost je na splošno opredeljena kot značilnost ali stanje biti enak po snovi, sestavi, naravi, lastnostih in zlasti po obravnavanih značilnostih (spletna izdaja slovarjev Oxford Dictionaries).
Identity exists not only when the goods and services completely coincide (the same terms or synonyms are used), but also when and insofar as the contested mark's goods/services fall within the earlier mark's broader category, or when and insofar as - conversely - a broader term of the contested mark includes the more specific goods/services of the earlier mark. 
Enakost ne obstaja samo takrat, kadar se blago in storitve popolnoma ujemajo (ko se uporabljajo isti izrazi ali sinonimi), temveč tudi, kadar in kolikor blago ali storitve izpodbijane znamke spadajo v širšo kategorijo prejšnje znamke ali obratno, če splošnejši izraz izpodbijane znamke vključuje natančneje določeno blago ali storitve prejšnje znamke.
There might also be identity when two broad categories under comparison coincide partially (‘overlap'). 
Enakost lahko obstaja tudi, če se dve širši kategoriji, ki se primerjata, delno ujemata („prekrivata“).
Hence a distinction can be made between cases of ‘full identity' and ‘partial identity'. 
Zato je mogoče razlikovati med primeri popolne in delne enakosti.
Identity should not be established on the basis of similarity factors (see paragraph 3.1.1 below). 
Enakost se ne sme ugotoviti na podlagi dejavnikov podobnosti (glej odstavek 3.1.1 v nadaljevanju).
2.2 Identical terms or synonyms 
Enaki izrazi ali sinonimi
Identity between the goods/services in dispute must be established on the basis of the wording of the relevant parts of the lists of goods and/or services of the two marks that have been identified in accordance with the principles set out above. 
Enakost izpodbijanega blaga ali storitev je treba ugotoviti na podlagi besedila ustreznih delov seznamov blaga in/ali storitev obeh znamk, ki so bili določeni v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi načeli.
Identity is obvious where the goods/services to be compared are listed in exactly the same terms. 
Enakost je očitna, če so blago ali storitve, ki se primerjajo, navedene s popolnoma enakimi izrazi.
Vehicles are identical to vehicles. 
Vozila so enaka vozilom.
Where this is not the case, the terms of the respective lists of goods and/or services must be interpreted in order to show that they are in fact synonyms, that is to say, that their meaning is the same. 
V drugih primerih je treba izraze ustreznih seznamov blaga in/ali storitev razložiti, s čimer se dokaže, da so dejansko sinonimi, tj. da imajo enak pomen.
The interpretation can be made based on dictionary definitions, expressions from the Nice Classification and, in particular, by taking into account the commercial perspective. 
Razlago je mogoče utemeljiti na slovarskih opredelitvah, izrazih iz Nicejske klasifikacije in zlasti ob upoštevanju poslovnega vidika.
Bicycle is a synonym for bike. 
V angleščini je bicycle (kolo) sinonim za cycle (kolo).
The goods are identical. 
Proizvoda sta enaka.
The meaning of the words smokers' articles in Class 34 refers to individual objects that are used in close connection with tobacco or tobacco products. 
Pomen besed potrebščine za uporabo s tobakom v razredu 34 vključuje posamezne predmete, ki se uporabljajo v tesni povezavi s tobakom in tobačnimi izdelki.
In former editions of the Nice Classification these products were called smokers' requisites. 
Ti izdelki so se v prejšnjih izdajah Nicejske klasifikacije imenovali potrebščine za kadilce.
Therefore, despite a different term used in the current heading, these goods are identical. 
Zato je to blago kljub uporabi drugega izraza v sedanjem naslovu enako.
From a commercial perspective, health spa services and wellness services are the same and are therefore identical. 
Storitve zdravilišč in velnes storitve so s poslovnega vidika isto, zato so enake.
However, if identical wording is used but the goods are classified in different classes, this generally means that these goods are not identical. 
Če se uporabi enako besedilo, vendar je blago uvrščeno v različne razrede, to običajno pomeni, da to blago ni enako.
Drills (machine tools) in Class 7 are not identical to drills (hand tools) in Class 8. 
Vrtalniki (orodni stroji) iz razreda 7 niso enaki vrtalnim strojem (ročno orodje) iz razreda 8.
Lasers (not for medical treatment) in Class 9 are not identical to lasers (for curative purposes) in Class 10. 
Laserji (razen za medicinske namene) iz razreda 9 niso enaki laserjem (za zdravilne namene) iz razreda 10.
Even though they might be similar, the classification in different classes indicates that they have a different nature, purpose or method of use, etc. 
Čeprav bi lahko bili podobni, razvrstitev v različne razrede kaže, da imajo različno naravo, namen ali način uporabe itd.
The same reasoning does not apply if the different classification is only due to a revision of the Nice Classification or where it is clear that the goods/services are wrongly ‘classified' due to an obvious mistake. 
Enaka obrazložitev se ne uporablja, če je različna razvrstitev le posledica revizije Nicejske klasifikacije ali če je jasno, da so blago ali storitve napačno „razvrščene“ zaradi očitne napake.
Playing cards (Class 16 - 7th edition) are identical to playing cards (Class 28 - 10th edition). 
Igralne karte (razred 16 - sedma izdaja) so enake igralnim kartam (razred 28 - deseta izdaja).
Pharmaceutical preparations (Class 15) - an obvious typing error - are identical to pharmaceutical preparations (Class 5). 
Farmacevtski pripravki (razred 15) - očitna tipkarska napaka - so enaki farmacevtskim pripravkom (razred 5).
2.3 Terms included in the general indication or broad category 
Izrazi, vključeni v splošno označbo ali široko kategorijo
2.3.1 The earlier mark includes the goods/services of the contested mark 
Prejšnja blagovna znamka vključuje blago ali storitve izpodbijane blagovne znamke.