natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 8(6) EUTMR is the ground for opposition based on designations of origin or geographical indications protected under EU legislation or Member State laws that confer on the person authorised under such laws the right to prohibit the unauthorised use of a subsequent trade mark. 
Člen 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je temelj za ugovor na podlagi označb porekla ali geografskih označb, zaščitenih v okviru zakonodaje EU ali prava držav članic, ki osebi, pooblaščeni na podlagi tega prava, daje pravico do prepovedi nepooblaščene uporabe poznejše blagovne znamke.
The opponent must prove that the designation of origin or geographical indication invoked is earlier than the date of application or, as the case may be, the priority date of the contested mark. 
Vložnik ugovora mora dokazati, da je bila označba porekla ali geografska označba, na katero se sklicuje, prijavljena pred datumom prijave ali pred datumom prednostne pravice izpodbijane znamke.
Various legal grounds, based on different earlier rights, may be alleged in either the same or multiple oppositions against the same EUTM application. 
Različni pravni razlogi, ki temeljijo na različnih prejšnjih pravicah, se lahko navedejo v istem ugovoru ali več ugovorih zoper isto prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
The Office's practice is based on the legal provisions of the EUTMR applied directly or by analogy, as confirmed by the case-law of the General Court (16/09/2004, T342/02, Moser Grupo Media, S.L., EU:T:2004:268; 11/05/2006, T194/05, Teletech International, EU:T:2006:124). 
Praksa Urada temelji na pravnih določbah Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ki se uporabljajo neposredno ali po analogiji, kot je potrjeno s sodno prakso Splošnega sodišča (16/09/2004, T342/02, Moser Grupo Media, S.L., EU:T:2004:268; 11/05/2006, T194/05, Teletech International, EU:T:2006:124).
Namely: 
In sicer:
multiple oppositions. 
Več ugovorov.
Article 9(2) and (3) EUTMDR allows the Office to examine only the ‘most effective' opposition(s), suspending the rest and eventually deeming them to have been dealt with if the application is rejected on the basis of the chosen opposition. 
Člen 9(2) in (3) Delegirane uredbe Uradu omogoča, da preizkusi samo „najučinkovitejši(-e)“ ugovor(-e), drugi pa se odloži(-jo) in se na koncu šteje(jo) za rešen(-e), če se prijava zavrne na podlagi izbranega(-ih) ugovora(ov).
With regard to the ‘most effective' opposition, see below. 
V zvezi z „najučinkovitejšim“ ugovorom glej besedilo v nadaljevanju.
multiple earlier rights in one opposition. 
Več prejšnjih pravic v enem ugovoru.
The Court has observed that grouping various earlier rights in one opposition is, for practical purposes, the same as presenting multiple oppositions, making it possible for the Office to base the rejection of the application on the ‘most effective' right(s). 
Sodišče je menilo, da je združitev različnih prejšnjih pravic v enem ugovoru iz praktičnih razlogov enako kot predložitev več ugovorov, kar Uradu omogoča, da zavrnitev prijave utemelji na podlagi „najučinkovitejše(-ih)“ pravice (pravic).
With regard to the ‘most effective' earlier right, see below. 
V zvezi z „najučinkovitejšo“ prejšnjo pravico glej besedilo v nadaljevanju.
multiple legal grounds in opposition(s). 
Več pravnih razlogov v ugovoru(-ih).
If the opposition is successful in its entirety on the basis of the ‘most effective' legal ground(s), it is not necessary to examine the remaining legal grounds. 
Če je ugovor uspešen v celoti na podlagi „najučinkovitejšega(-ih)“ pravnega(-ih) razloga(-ov), drugih pravnih podlag ni treba proučiti.
If a necessary requirement of a legal ground is not fulfilled, it is not necessary to examine the remaining requirements of that provision. 
Če nujna zahteva za pravno podlago ni izpolnjena, drugih zahtev iz navedene določbe ni treba proučiti.
With regard to the ‘most effective' legal ground(s), see below. 
V zvezi z „najučinkovitejšo(-imi)“ pravno(-imi) podlago(-ami) glej besedilo v nadaljevanju.
4 The Purpose of Opposition Proceedings and the Most Expedient Way to Treat Them 
Namen postopka ugovora in najustreznejši način njegovega obravnavanja
The Court of Justice has stated that the sole purpose of opposition proceedings is to decide whether the application may proceed to registration and not to pre-emptively settle potential conflicts (e.g. at a national level arising from the possible conversion of the EUTM application) (11/05/2006, T194/05, Teletech International, EU:T:2006:124, § 25-27). 
Sodišče je navedlo, da je edini namen postopka ugovora določiti, ali se lahko postopek prijave nadaljuje do registracije, in ne vnaprejšnje reševanje morebitnih sporov (na primer na nacionalni ravni, ki bi izhajali iz morebitne konverzije prijave blagovne znamke EU) (11/05/2006, T194/05, Teletech International, EU:T:2006:124, § 25-27).
The Court of Justice has confirmed clearly that the Office is under no obligation to examine all the earlier oppositions, rights and legal grounds invoked against the same EUTM application, if one of them suffices to reject the EUTM application. 
Sodišče je jasno potrdilo, da Uradu ni treba proučiti vseh prejšnjih ugovorov, pravic in pravnih razlogov, ki se uveljavljajo zoper isto prijavo blagovne znamke EU, če eden od njih zadostuje za zavrnitev te prijave.
Nor is it obliged to choose the earlier right with the widest territorial scope so as to prevent the eventual conversion of the application in as many territories as possible (16/09/2004, T342/02, Moser Grupo Media, S.L., EU:T:2004:268; 11/05/2006, T194/05, Teletech International, EU:T:2006:124). 
Urad prav tako ni zavezan izbrati prejšnje pravice z največjim geografskim območjem veljave, da bi preprečil morebitno konverzijo prijave na čim več geografskih območjih (16/09/2004, T342/02, Moser Grupo Media, S.L., EU:T:2004:268; 11/05/2006, T194/05, Teletech International, EU:T:2006:124).
This principle allows for a more expedient treatment of oppositions. 
To načelo omogoča ustreznejše obravnavanje ugovorov.
The Office is free to choose what it regards as the ‘most effective' opposition(s), earlier right(s) and legal ground(s) and which one to examine first in light of the principle of procedural economy. 
Urad lahko ob upoštevanju ekonomičnosti postopka prosto določi, kaj se šteje za „najučinkovitejši(-e)“ ugovor(-e), prejšnjo(-e) pravico(-e) in pravno(-e) podlago(-e) ter katere bo proučil najprej.
The ‘most effective' opposition can normally be defined as the opposition that allows the Office to refuse the registration of the opposed EUTM application to the broadest possible extent and in the simplest manner. 
„Najučinkovitejši“ ugovor je običajno mogoče opredeliti kot ugovor, ki Uradu omogoča, da registracijo izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU zavrne v najširšem možnem obsegu in na najpreprostejši način.
The ‘most effective' earlier right can normally be defined as the most similar (the closest) sign covering the broadest scope of goods and services and/or the right covering the most similar goods and services. 
„Najučinkovitejšo“ prejšnjo pravico je običajno mogoče opredeliti kot najbolj podoben (najbližji) znak, ki vključuje najširši obseg blaga in storitev, in/ali pravico, ki vključuje najbolj podobno blago in storitve.
The ‘most effective' legal ground can normally be defined as the opposition ground that presents the Office with the simplest manner of refusing the registration of the opposed EUTM application to the broadest possible extent. 
„Najučinkovitejšo“ pravno podlago je običajno mogoče opredeliti kot podlago za ugovor, ki Uradu omogoča, da registracijo izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU zavrne v najširšem možnem obsegu na najpreprostejši način.
Generally speaking, if applicable, Article 8(1)(a) EUTMR will be the simplest ground in terms of procedural economy on which to reject an EUTM application, since the Office will not need to enter into an analysis of similarities and differences between the signs or goods/services, nor will a finding of likelihood of confusion be necessary. 
Na splošno bo člen 8(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v smislu ekonomičnosti postopka, če je to ustrezno, najpreprostejši razlog za zavrnitev prijave blagovne znamke EU, ker Uradu ne bo treba opraviti analize podobnosti in razlik med znaki in blagom ali storitvami, poleg tega se ne bo zahtevala ugotovitev verjetnosti zmede.
Failing that, the factual circumstances of each opposition will determine whether Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(3), (4), (5) or (6) EUTMR are the next ‘most effective' grounds (e.g. if the goods and services of the earlier right and the EUTM application are different, Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(3) EUTMR cannot serve as a valid basis for opposition, the former requiring at least some similarity in this respect, and the latter requiring at least closely related or commercially equivalent goods and services). 
Če to ni mogoče, se na podlagi dejanskih okoliščin posameznih ugovorov določi, ali je člen 8(1)(b), (3), (4), (5) ali (6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU naslednji „najučinkovitejši“ razlog (npr. če so blago in storitve iz prejšnje pravice in prijave blagovne znamke EU različni, se člen 8(1)(b) in (3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne more uporabljati kot veljavna podlaga za ugovor, saj se za prvega zahteva vsaj določena stopnja podobnosti v zvezi s tem, za drugega pa vsaj tesno povezano ali komercialno enakovredno blago in storitve).
If evidence of use has been requested by the applicant in relation to some of the earlier rights, the Office will normally firstly consider if one earlier right not yet under the use obligation is capable of fully sustaining the opposition. 
Če je prijavitelj v zvezi z nekaterimi prejšnjimi pravicami zahteval dokaz o uporabi, bo Urad običajno najprej proučil, ali je mogoče z eno prejšnjo pravico, za katero obveznost uporabe še ne velja, v celoti ugoditi ugovoru.
If not, other earlier rights not yet under the use obligation will be examined to see if the opposition can be fully sustained on such a cumulative basis. 
Če ni mogoče, se bodo proučile druge prejšnje pravice, za katere obveznost uporabe še ne velja, da se ugotovi, ali je mogoče na takšni kumulativni podlagi v celoti ugoditi ugovoru.
In these cases, the EUTM application will be rejected without it being necessary to consider proof of use. 
V teh primerih se prijava blagovne znamke EU zavrne, pri čemer ni treba upoštevati dokazov o uporabi.
Only if no such earlier right(s) is (are) available, will the Office consider those earlier rights against which proof of use was requested. 
Samo če takšna(-e) prejšnja(-e) pravica(-e) ni(-so) na voljo, bo Urad proučil prejšnje pravice, za katere so se zahtevali dokazi o uporabi.
When an opposition is filed pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR and a likelihood of confusion can be found on the basis of a (substantial) part of the public, the reasoning of the decision should concentrate on that part of the public that is most prone to confusion and the analysis should not extend to all parts. 
Če se ugovor vloži v skladu s členom 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in je mogoče ugotoviti verjetnost zmede v (precejšnjem) delu javnosti, se mora utemeljitev odločbe osredotočiti na tisti del javnosti, ki je bolj nagnjen k zmedi, analiza pa ne sme zajeti vseh delov javnosti.
This would apply in particular in the following situations. 
To se uporablja predvsem v naslednjih okoliščinah.
Where there is likelihood of confusion in a specific linguistic area, the Office's analysis need not extend to the whole EU but may instead focus on that part (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 4, Comparison of Signs, paragraph 1.6, Relevant territory and relevant public). 
Če obstaja verjetnost zmede na nekem jezikovnem območju, analize Urada ni treba razširiti na celotno EU, ampak se lahko namesto tega osredotoči na zadevni del (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 4: Primerjava znakov, odstavek 1.6: Upoštevno ozemlje in upoštevna javnost).
For example, if the level of similarity between the marks is higher from the perception of a particular language, the examination of the perception of the marks by the public in other language areas (e.g. examining specific pronunciations or meanings of marks in several languages) is redundant. 
Na primer, če je stopnja podobnosti znamk večja z vidika zaznavanja v nekem jeziku, je proučitev zaznavanja znamk v javnosti na drugih jezikovnih področjih (npr. proučitev posebnih izgovarjav ali pomenov znamk v več jezikih) odveč.
Where the relevant public consists of both general and professional consumers, the finding of a likelihood of confusion in relation to just one part of the public is sufficient to uphold an opposition. 
Kadar upoštevno javnost sestavljajo tako splošni kot strokovni potrošniki, za sprejetje ugovora zadostuje, da se ugotovi verjetnost zmede v zvezi z le enim delom javnosti.
Usually it is the general public that is more prone to confusion. 
Ponavadi je splošna javnost bolj nagnjena k zmedi.
Consequently, if the likelihood of confusion is to be confirmed on the part of the general public, there is no need to examine it based on the perception of professionals. 
Če se verjetnost zmede potrdi v zvezi s splošno javnostjo, je tako ni treba preizkusiti glede na zaznavanje strokovnjakov.
In such circumstances, it should be explained from the beginning of the decision why such a focus has been chosen. 
V teh primerih je treba na začetku odločbe pojasniti, zakaj je bila izbrana tovrstna osredotočenost.
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part C, Opposition Page 4 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del C, Ugovor stran 1
Procedural Matters 
Postopkovne zadeve
PROCEDURAL MATTERS 
POSTOPKOVNE ZADEVE
1 Introduction - General Outline of Opposition Proceedings 6 
1 Uvod - splošni opis postopka ugovora 6
2 Notice of Opposition 7 
2 Ugovor 7
2.1 Notice of opposition in writing 7 
2.1 Pisni ugovor 7
2.1.1 Early oppositions against an international registration 7 
2.1.1 Predčasni ugovori zoper mednarodno registracijo 7
2.1.2 Early opposition against an EUTM application 8 
2.1.2 Predčasni ugovor zoper prijavo blagovne znamke EU 8
2.2 Payment 8 
2.2 Plačilo 8
2.2.1 Notice of opposition late, payment within the opposition period 8 
2.2.1 Prepozen ugovor, plačilo v roku za vložitev ugovora 8
2.2.2 Time of payment 9 
2.2.2 Čas plačila 9
2.2.2.1 Payment by bank transfer 9 
2.2.2.1 Plačilo z bančnim nakazilom 9
2.2.2.2 Payment by current account 9 
2.2.2.2 Plačilo na transakcijski račun 9
2.2.3 Consequences in the event of non-payment 10 
2.2.3 Posledice v primeru neplačila 10
2.3 Languages and translation of the notice of opposition 10 
2.3 Jeziki in prevod ugovora 10
2.3.1 Language of proceedings 10 
2.3.1 Jezik postopka 10
2.3.2 Examples 12 
2.3.2 Primeri 11
2.4 Admissibility check 12 
2.4 Preizkus dopustnosti 12
2.4.1 Absolute admissibility requirements 13 
2.4.1 Absolutne zahteve za dopustnost 13
2.4.1.1 Identification of the contested EUTM application 13 
2.4.1.1 Opredelitev izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU 13
2.4.1.2 Identification of earlier marks or rights 14 
2.4.1.2 Opredelitev prejšnjih znamk ali pravic 14
2.4.1.3 Identification of grounds 18 
2.4.1.3 Opredelitev razlogov 18
2.4.2 Relative admissibility requirements 19 
2.4.2 Relativne zahteve za dopustnost 18
2.4.2.1 Dates 19 
2.4.2.1 Datumi 18
2.4.2.2 Representation of earlier marks/signs 19 
2.4.2.2 Prikaz prejšnjih znamk ali znakov 19
2.4.2.3 Goods and services 21 
2.4.2.3 Blago in storitve 21
2.4.2.4 Earlier mark with a reputation: territorial scope of reputation 22 
2.4.2.4 Prejšnja znamka z ugledom: obseg ugleda 22
2.4.2.5 Identification of the opponent 22 
2.4.2.5 Opredelitev vložnika ugovora 22
2.4.2.6 Professional representation 26 
2.4.2.6 Poklicno zastopanje 26
2.4.2.7 Signature 27 
2.4.2.7 Podpis 27
2.4.2.8 Relative admissibility requirements: sanctions 27 
2.4.2.8 Relativne zahteve za dopustnost: sankcije 27
2.4.3 Optional indications 27 
2.4.3 Neobvezne navedbe 27
2.4.3.1 Extent of opposition 27 
2.4.3.1 Obseg ugovora 27
2.4.3.2 Reasoned statement on grounds 28 
2.4.3.2 Utemeljena izjava z vzroki 28
2.5 Notification of the notice of opposition 28 
2.5 Uradno obvestilo o ugovoru 28
3 Cooling-off Period 29 
3 Obdobje za pobotanje 28
3.1 Setting the cooling-off period in motion 29 
3.1 Začetek obdobja za pobotanje 28
3.2 Extension of the cooling-off period 30 
3.2 Podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje 29
4 Adversarial Stage 31 
4 Kontradiktorna faza 30
4.1 Completion of the opposition 31 
4.1 Dopolnitev ugovora 30
4.2 Substantiation 31 
4.2 Utemeljitev 31
4.2.1 EUTMs and EUTM applications 33 
4.2.1 Blagovne znamke EU in prijave blagovnih znamk EU 32
4.2.2 Converted EUTMs and EUTM applications 33 
4.2.2 Konvertirane blagovne znamke EU in prijave blagovnih znamk EU 32
4.2.2.1 Opposition based on EUTM (application) (to be) converted 33 
4.2.2.1 Ugovor, ki temelji na (prihodnji) konvertirani blagovni znamki EU (prijavi blagovne znamke EU) 32
4.2.2.2 Opposition based on EUTM (application) that is subsequently converted 33 
4.2.2.2 Ugovor, ki temelji na blagovni znamki EU (prijavi blagovne znamke EU), ki je pozneje konvertirana 32
4.2.3 Trade mark registrations or applications that are not EUTMs 33 
4.2.3 Registracije ali prijave blagovnih znamk, ki niso blagovne znamke EU 33
4.2.3.1 Certificates issued by the appropriate official body 34 
4.2.3.1 Potrdila, ki jih izda ustrezni uradni organ 33
4.2.3.2 Extracts from official databases 34 
4.2.3.2 Izpiski iz uradnih podatkovnih zbirk 34
4.2.3.3 Extracts from official bulletins of the relevant national trade mark offices and WIPO 36 
4.2.3.3 Izpiski iz uradnih biltenov zadevnih nacionalnih uradov za znamke in organizacije WIPO 35
4.2.3.4 Duration of a trade mark registration 36 
4.2.3.4 Veljavnost registracije blagovne znamke 36
4.2.3.5 Entitlement to file the opposition 38 
4.2.3.5 Upravičenost do vložitve ugovora 37
4.2.3.6 Verification of evidence 39 
4.2.3.6 Preverjanje dokazov 38
4.2.4 Substantiation of well-known marks, claims of reputation, trade marks filed by an agent, earlier signs used in the course of trade, designations of origin or geographical indications 40 
4.2.4 Utemeljitev znanih znamk, znamk z ugledom, blagovnih znamk, ki jih vloži posrednik, prejšnjih znakov, ki se uporabljajo v gospodarskem prometu, označb porekla ali geografskih označb 40
4.2.4.1 Well-known marks 40 
4.2.4.1 Znane znamke 40
4.2.4.2 Marks with reputation 41 
4.2.4.2 Znamke z ugledom 40
4.2.4.3 Non-registered trade mark or another sign used in the course of trade 41 
4.2.4.3 Neregistrirana blagovna znamka ali drug znak, ki se uporablja v gospodarskem prometu 41
4.2.4.4 Protected designations of origin, protected geographical indications 42 
4.2.4.4 Zaščitene označbe porekla, zaščitene geografske označbe 41
4.2.4.5 Mark filed by an agent or representative 43 
4.2.4.5 Znamka, ki jo vloži posrednik ali zastopnik 42
4.2.5 Non-compliance with the substantiation requirements 43 
4.2.5 Neupoštevanje zahtev glede utemeljitve 43
4.2.6 Facts and evidence submitted after the substantiation time limit 44 
4.2.6 Dejstva in dokazi, predloženi po roku za utemeljitev 44
4.2.6.3 Treatment of late evidence in proceedings 46 
4.2.6.3 Obravnava prepozno predloženih dokazov v postopku 45
4.3 Translation/changes of language during the opposition proceedings 46 
4.3 Prevod/spremembe jezika med postopkom ugovora 46
4.3.1 Translations of evidence submitted to substantiate the opposition and of facts, evidence and arguments submitted by the opponent to complete its file 46 
4.3.1 Prevodi dokazov, predloženih za utemeljitev ugovora, ter dejstev, dokazov in navedb, ki jih za dopolnitev spisa predloži vložnik ugovora 46
4.3.1.1 Translation of evidence of filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, and provisions of the applicable national law 47 
4.3.1.1 Prevodi potrdil o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovrednih dokumentov ter določb nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja 46
4.3.1.2 Translations of evidence submitted to substantiate the opposition other than filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, or provisions of the applicable national law 48 
4.3.1.2 Prevodi dokazov, predloženih za utemeljitev ugovora, ki niso potrdila o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovredni dokumenti ali določbe nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja 48
4.3.1.3 Translations of facts and arguments submitted by the opponent to complete its file 49 
4.3.1.3 Prevodi dejstev in navedb, ki jih za dopolnitev spisa predloži vložnik ugovora 48
4.3.2 Translation of further observations 49 
4.3.2 Prevod dodatnih pripomb 48
4.3.3 Translation of supporting documents other than observations 50 
4.3.3 Prevod dokazov, ki niso pripombe 49
4.3.4 Proof of use 51 
4.3.4 Dokaz o uporabi 50
4.3.5 Change of language during opposition proceedings 52 
4.3.5 Sprememba jezika med postopkom ugovora 50
4.4 Requests and other documents related issues 52 
4.4 Vprašanja v zvezi z zahtevami in drugimi dokumenti 51
4.4.1 Restrictions, withdrawals and requests for proof of use to be filed by way of a separate document 52 
4.4.1 Omejitve, umiki in zahteve za dokaz o uporabi, ki jih je treba vložiti v ločenem dokumentu 51
4.4.2 Documents not readable 53 
4.4.2 Neberljivi dokumenti 52
4.4.3 No return of original documents 53 
4.4.3 Nevračanje izvirnih dokumentov 52
4.4.4 Confidential information 53 
4.4.4 Zaupne informacije 52
4.4.5 References made to documents or items of evidence in other proceedings 54 
4.4.5 Sklicevanja na dokumente ali dokaze v drugih postopkih 53
4.5 Further exchanges 55 
4.5 Dodatne izmenjave 54
4.6 Observations by third parties 56 
4.6 Pripombe tretjih oseb 55
5 Termination of Proceedings 57 
5 Končanje postopka 55
5.1 Friendly settlement 57 
5.1 Sporazumna rešitev 55
5.2 Restrictions and withdrawals 57 
5.2 Omejitve in umiki 56
5.2.1 Restrictions and withdrawals of EUTM applications 57 
5.2.1 Omejitve in umiki prijav blagovne znamke EU 56
5.2.1.1 Withdrawal or restriction before the admissibility check is made 58 
5.2.1.1 Umik ali omejitev pred preizkusom dopustnosti 57
5.2.1.2 Restrictions and withdrawals of EUTM applications before the end of the cooling-off period 59 
5.2.1.2 Omejitve in umiki prijav blagovne znamke EU pred iztekom obdobja za pobotanje 58
5.2.1.3 Restrictions and withdrawals of EUTM applications after the end of the cooling-off period 60 
5.2.1.3 Omejitve in umiki prijav blagovne znamke EU po izteku obdobja za pobotanje 58
5.2.1.4 Restrictions and withdrawals of EUTM applications after a decision has been taken 60 
5.2.1.4 Omejitve in umiki prijav blagovne znamke EU po sprejetju odločbe 59
5.2.1.5 Language 61 
5.2.1.5 Jezik 59
5.2.2 Withdrawal of oppositions 61 
5.2.2 Umik ugovorov 60
5.2.2.1 Withdrawal of the opposition before the end of the cooling-off period 61 
5.2.2.1 Umik ugovora pred iztekom obdobja za pobotanje 60
5.2.2.2 Withdrawal of the opposition after the end of the cooling-off period 62 
5.2.2.2 Umik ugovora po izteku obdobja za pobotanje 60
5.2.2.3 Withdrawal of the opposition after a decision has been taken 62 
5.2.2.3 Umik ugovora po sprejetju odločbe 60
5.2.2.4 Language 62 
5.2.2.4 Jezik 61
5.2.3 Withdrawals of withdrawals/restrictions 62 
5.2.3 Umiki umikov/omejitev 61
5.3 Decision on substance 62 
5.3 Meritorna odločba 61
5.3.1 Earlier right not proven 63 
5.3.1 Prejšnja pravica, ki ni dokazana 61
5.3.2 Earlier right has ceased to exist 63 
5.3.2 Prenehanje obstoja prejšnje pravice 61
5.4 Fee refund 64 
5.4 Povračilo pristojbine 62
5.4.1 Opposition deemed not entered 64 
5.4.1 Ugovor, ki se ne šteje za vloženega 62
5.4.1.1 Opposition and withdrawal of the opposition filed the same date 64 
5.4.1.1 Ugovor in umik ugovora, vložena istega dne 62
5.4.1.2 Refund after republication 64 
5.4.1.2 Povračilo po ponovni objavi 62
5.4.2 Refund in view of withdrawals/restrictions of EUTM application 64 
5.4.2 Povračilo pri umikih/omejitvah prijave blagovne znamke EU 62
5.4.2.1 EUTM application withdrawn/restricted before end of cooling-off period 64 
5.4.2.1 Umik/omejitev prijave blagovne znamke EU pred iztekom obdobja za pobotanje 62