natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If at any stage of the proceedings one of the parties does not submit observations within the specified time limit, the Office will close the adversarial part and take a decision on the basis of the evidence before it (Article 17(2) EUTMDR). 
Če ena od strank na kateri koli stopnji postopka ne predloži pripomb v določenem roku, bo Urad kontradiktorni del končal in sprejel odločitev na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazov (člen 17(2) Delegirane uredbe).
As regards the rules on time limits, extensions, notification or change of parties in the course of proceedings, etc., see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, as the rules are applicable mutatis mutandis. 
Za pravila glede rokov, podaljšanj, obveščanja ali spremembe strank med postopkom itd. glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, saj se pravila uporabljajo smiselno.
3.2 Substantiation 
Utemeljitev
Article 16 and Article 17(2), (3) and (4) EUTMDR 
Člen 16 ter člen 17(2), (3) in (4) Delegirane uredbe
The applicant has up to the closure of the adversarial part of the proceedings to present the facts, evidence and arguments in support of the application. 
Vložnik zahteve lahko predloži dejstva, dokaze in navedbe za podkrepitev zahteve vse do zaključka kontradiktornega dela postopka.
This means that it may do so with the application for cancellation, once the Office has informed of the admissibility of the application and invited the EUTM proprietor to submit observations (Article 17(1) EUTMDR), or during a time limit set by the Office for the applicant to submit observations in response to the EUTM proprietor (pursuant to Article 17(2) EUTMDR and Article 64(1) EUTMR). 
To pomeni, da lahko to stori ob predložitvi zahteve za izbris po tem, ko Urad stranke obvesti o dopustnosti zahteve in pozove imetnika blagovne znamke EU, naj predloži pripombe (člen 17(1) Delegirane uredbe), ali v roku, ki ga Urad določi vložniku zahteve za predložitev pripomb v odziv na navedbe imetnika blagovne znamke EU (v skladu s členom 17(2) Delegirane uredbe in členom 64(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
However, for reasons of procedural economy the Office highly recommends that all facts, evidence and arguments in support of the application (including any necessary translations) are presented together with the initial application for cancellation. 
Vendar Urad zaradi gospodarnosti postopka močno priporoča, da se vsa dejstva, dokazi in navedbe v podporo zahtevi (vključno z vsemi potrebnimi prevodi) predložijo skupaj s prvotno zahtevo za izbris.
In the case of an application for revocation pursuant to Article 58(1)(a) EUTMR, the onus is on the EUTM proprietor to submit the proof of genuine use or of proper reasons for non-use; therefore, this is the only case where the applicant does not have to substantiate the application (Article 19(1) EUTMDR). 
V primeru zahteve za razveljavitev v skladu s členom 58(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU mora imetnik blagovne znamke EU predložiti dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi oziroma upravičene razloge za neuporabo; zato je to edini primer, v katerem vložniku ni treba utemeljiti zahteve (člen 19(1) Delegirane uredbe).
In the case of an application for revocation pursuant to Article 58(1)(b) or (c) EUTMR or an application for invalidity based on absolute grounds pursuant to Article 59 EUTMR, the applicant must submit facts, arguments and evidence to support the grounds on which the application is based (Article 16(1)(a) EUTMDR). 
V primeru zahteve za razveljavitev v skladu s členom 58(1)(b) ali (c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ali zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti na podlagi absolutnih razlogov v skladu s členom 59 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU mora vložnik zahteve predložiti dejstva, navedbe in dokaze v podporo razlogom, na katerih temelji zahteva (člen 16(1)(a) Delegirane uredbe).
In the case of an application for invalidity based on relative grounds pursuant to Article 60(1) EUTMR, the applicant must prove the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier rights invoked, as well as submit evidence proving its entitlement to file the application for cancellation (Article 16(1)(b) EUTMDR). 
V primeru zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti na podlagi relativnih razlogov v skladu s členom 60(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU mora vložnik zahteve dokazati obstoj, veljavnost in obseg varstva prejšnjih pravic, ki se uveljavljajo, ter predložiti dokaze o tem, da je upravičen do vložitve zahteve za izbris (člen 16(1)(b) Delegirane uredbe).
As regards substantiation requirements of earlier rights, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, paragraph 4.2, and the section on invalidity proceedings based on relative grounds in the Guidelines, Part D, Cancellation, Section 2, Substantive Provisions. 
Kar zadeva zahteve glede utemeljitve v zvezi s prejšnjimi pravicami, glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, odstavek 4.2, in razdelek o postopkih za ugotovitev ničnosti na podlagi relativnih razlogov v Smernicah, del D: Izbris, razdelek 2: Vsebinske določbe.
In the case of an application for invalidity based on relative grounds pursuant to Article 60(2) EUTMR, the applicant must submit evidence of acquisition, continued existence and scope of protection of the earlier right, as well as evidence proving its entitlement to file the application for cancellation (Article 16(1)(c) EUTMDR). 
V primeru zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti na podlagi relativnih razlogov v skladu s členom 60(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU mora vložnik zahteve predložiti dokaze o pridobitvi, nadaljnjem obstoju in obsegu varstva prejšnje pravice ter dokaze o tem, da je upravičen do vložitve zahteve za izbris (člen 16(1)(c) Delegirane uredbe).
Furthermore, for grounds invoked pursuant to Article 60(1)(c) and (d) and Article 60(2) EUTMR, where rights are invoked under national law, the applicant must provide the reference to and the wording of the provisions of national law on which it bases its case and make its case under that law. 
Poleg tega mora vložnik zahteve v zvezi z razlogi, na katere se sklicuje na podlagi člena 60(1)(c) in (d) ter člena 60(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, v primerih sklicevanja na pravice v skladu z nacionalnim pravom predložiti sklicevanje na določbe nacionalnega prava, na katerih temelji njegova zahteva, in besedilo zadevnih določb ter utemeljiti svoje argumente na navedenem pravu.
See the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 4, Rights under Article 8(4) and (6) EUTMR (Article 16(1)(c) EUTMDR). 
Glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 4: Pravice iz člena 8(4) in (6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (člen 16(1)(c) Delegirane uredbe).
If the applicant does not submit the facts, arguments or evidence required to substantiate the application, the application will be rejected as unfounded (Article 17(3) EUTMDR). 
Če vložnik zahteve ne predloži potrebnih dejstev, ali dokazov za utemeljitev zahteve, se zahteva zavrne kot neutemeljena (člen 17(3) Delegirane uredbe).
3.2.1 Online Evidence 
Spletni dokazi
3.2.1.1 Earlier trade mark applications and registrations, non-registered trade marks and other signs used in the course of trade, designations of origin and geographical indications (Article 60(1) EUTMR) 
Prejšnje prijave in registracije blagovne znamke, neregistrirane blagovne znamke in drugi znaki, ki se uporabljajo v gospodarskem prometu, označbe porekla in geografske označbe (člen 60(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU)
According to Article 16(1)(b) EUTMDR, in the case of an application for invalidity based on the relative grounds for invalidity listed in Article 60(1) EUTMR, the evidence required for the substantiation of the claim is the same as that required in opposition proceedings, as Article 7(3) EUTMDR applies mutatis mutandis. 
V skladu s členom 16(1)(b) Delegirane uredbe so v primeru zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti na podlagi relativnih razlogov za ničnost, navedenih v členu 60(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, dokazi, potrebni za utemeljitev zahteve, enaki kot dokazi, ki se zahtevajo v postopku ugovora, saj se smiselno uporablja člen 7(3) Delegirane uredbe.
This also means, that the applicant in invalidity proceedings can rely on online substantiation for evidence of filing or registration of these earlier rights, and, where applicable, the relevant national law. 
To tudi pomeni, da se lahko vložnik zahteve v postopku za ugotovitev ničnosti opira na spletno utemeljitev v zvezi s potrdili o vložitvi ali registraciji teh prejšnjih pravic in, če je ustrezno, na zadevno nacionalno pravo.
As the practice of informing the Office of the intention to rely on online evidence, and the identification of the online source is the same as for opposition proceedings, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, paragraph 4.2, where the process of ‘formal declaration' is explained, and later to each specific paragraph concerning each type of earlier right for the identification of the online sources. 
Ker je praksa glede obveščanja Urada o nameri, da se bodo uporabili spletni dokazi, in opredelitve spletnega vira enaka kot pri postopku ugovora, glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, odstavek 4.2, v katerem je je pojasnjen postopek „formalne izjave“, in pozneje vsak specifični odstavek glede vsake vrste prejšnje pravice za opredelitev spletnih virov.
3.2.1.2 Industrial property rights (Article 60(2)(d) EUTMR) 
Pravice industrijske lastnine (člen 60(2)(d) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU)
In addition to the above, according to Article 16(1)(c) EUTMDR, second sentence, where evidence concerning the filing or registration of an earlier industrial property right is to be submitted (under Article 60(2)(d) EUTMR), including where evidence concerning the contents of the relevant national law is required under this ground, and this evidence is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the applicant may rely on online substantiation. 
Poleg zgoraj navedenega v skladu z drugim stavkom člena 16(1)(c) Delegirane uredbe velja, da če je treba predložiti dokaze o vložitvi ali registraciji prejšnje pravice industrijske lastnine (na podlagi člena 60(2)(d) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), med drugim tudi, kadar se na podlagi tega razloga zahtevajo dokazi o vsebini zadevnega nacionalnega prava in so ti dokazi dostopni prek spletnega vira, ki ga priznava Urad, se lahko vložnik zahteve opre na spletno utemeljitev.
Reliance on an industrial property right is specific to invalidity proceedings; however, applying the same reasoning and process set out in opposition proceedings, the applicant must formally declare its reliance on online substantiation before the expiry of the substantiation deadline. 
Sklicevanje na pravico industrijske lastnine je specifično za postopke za ugotavljanje ničnosti, vendar mora vložnik zahteve ob upoštevanju istih argumentov in procesa, določenih v postopku ugovora, pred iztekom roka za utemeljitev predložiti formalno izjavo, da se bo opiral na spletno utemeljitev.
In addition, the Office will accept the identification of the official publications and/or national databases to the extent that they originate from the government or official body of the respective Member State, and if they are publically accessible and free of charge. 
Poleg tega bo Urad sprejel opredelitev uradnih publikacij in/ali nacionalnih podatkovnih zbirk, če izvirajo od vladnega ali uradnega organa zadevne države članice ter če so javno dostopne in brezplačne.
For the identification of national law, the same requirements apply as in non-registered trade marks or other signs used in the course of trade (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, paragraph 4.2.4.3). 
V zvezi z opredelitvijo nacionalnega prava se uporabljajo iste zahteve kot v zvezi z neregistriranimi blagovnimi znamkami ali drugimi znaki, ki se uporabljajo v gospodarskem prometu (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, odstavek 4.2.4.3).
3.3 Translations and changes of language during cancellation proceedings 
Prevodi in spremembe jezika med postopkom izbrisa
3.3.1 Change of language 
Sprememba jezika
Article 13 EUTMDR 
Člen 13 Delegirane uredbe
The language of cancellation proceedings will in general be determined by the applicant in the cancellation application and has to comply with Article 146 EUTMR. 
Jezik postopka izbrisa, ki mora biti v skladu s členom 146 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, bo na splošno določil vložnik zahteve v zahtevi za izbris.
See paragraph 2.4.1 above for more details about the choice of language for cancellation proceedings. 
Za več podrobnosti o izbiri jezika za postopek izbrisa glej odstavek 2.4.1 zgoraj.
However, the parties to cancellation proceedings may also agree on a different official language of the European Union as the language of the proceedings (Article 146(8) EUTMR). 
Stranke v postopku izbrisa se lahko sporazumejo, da je jezik postopka tudi drug uradni jezik Evropske unije (člen 146(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
This agreement has to be communicated to the Office within 2 months of the notification of the application for cancellation to the EUTM proprietor. 
Urad je treba o tem sporazumu obvestiti v dveh mesecih po tem, ko je bilo imetniku blagovne znamke EU poslano uradno obvestilo glede zahteve za izbris.
Where the application has not been filed in that language, the EUTM proprietor may request that the applicant submit a translation into that language. 
Če zahteva ni bila vložena v navedenem jeziku, lahko imetnik blagovne znamke EU zahteva, da vložnik zahteve predloži prevod v navedeni jezik.
The translation request must be received by the Office within the same 2month period. 
Urad mora zahtevo za prevod prejeti v zadevnem dvomesečnem obdobju.
In this case, the applicant will be invited by the Office to submit the translation of the application into the language chosen by both parties within a time limit set for this purpose. 
V tem primeru bo Urad vložnika zahteve pozval, naj predloži prevod zahteve v jezik, ki ga izbereta obe stranki, in sicer v roku, določenem za ta namen.
Where the translation is formally requested and it is not submitted or it is submitted late, or where the request to change the language is submitted late (after the expiry of the 2 months), the language of the proceedings will remain unchanged (Article 13 EUTMDR). 
Če se prevod formalno zahteva in ni predložen oziroma je predložen prepozno ali če je zahteva za spremembo jezika predložena prepozno (po izteku dvomesečnega roka), bo jezik postopka ostal nespremenjen (člen 13 Delegirane uredbe).
3.3.2 Translation of evidence of substantiation submitted by the applicant 
Prevod dokazov o utemeljitvi, ki jih predloži vložnik zahteve
Article 16(2) EUTMDR 
Člen 16(2) Delegirane uredbe
Article 24 and Article 25(1) EUTMIR 
Člen 24 in člen 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe
3.3.2.1 Evidence of filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, any provisions of the applicable national law 
Dokazi o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovredni dokumenti ter določbe veljavnega nacionalnega prava
Where the application is based on the grounds of Article 60(1) and (2) EUTMR, the evidence concerning the filing, registration or renewal of earlier marks or rights, or where applicable, the contents of the relevant national law must be submitted in the language of the proceedings, or should be translated into the language of the proceedings. 
Če zahteva temelji na razlogih iz člena 60(1) in (2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, je treba dokaze o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju prejšnjih blagovnih znamk ali pravic ali, če je ustrezno, vsebini ustreznega nacionalnega prava predložiti v jeziku postopka oziroma jih je treba prevesti v jezik postopka.
The translation is to be submitted by the applicant of its own motion within 1 month of the filing of such evidence. 
Vložnik zahteve mora prevod predložiti na svojo pobudo v enem mesecu od vložitve takšnih dokazov.
This applies to all the evidence submitted by the applicant in the course of the proceedings in order to comply with the requirements of Article 16(1)(b) and (c) EUTMDR, whether it is submitted together with the application or at a later stage. 
To velja za vse dokaze, ki jih vložnik zahteve predloži med postopkom za izpolnitev zahtev iz člena 16(1)(b) in (c) Delegirane uredbe, in sicer ne glede na to, ali so predložena skupaj z zahtevo ali v poznejši fazi.
The Office will not send a deficiency letter, and it is up to the applicant to submit the translation of the evidence in support of the application of its own motion. 
Urad ne bo pošiljal poziva za dopolnitev zahteve, vložnik zahteve pa mora na svojo pobudo poskrbeti, da predloži prevod dokazov v podporo zahtevi.
The requirement of translating the evidence of substantiation also relates to online evidence referred to by the applicant, where the language of the online evidence is not the same as the language of the proceedings. 
Zahteva glede prevoda dokazov o utemeljitvi se nanaša tudi na spletne dokaze, na katera se sklicuje vložnik zahteve, če jezik spletnih dokazov ni jezik postopka.
This follows from Article 16(2) EUTMDR, which states that ‘evidence accessible online' must also either be in the language of the proceedings, or be accompanied by a translation. 
To izhaja iz člena 16(2) Delegirane uredbe, ki določa, da so dokazi dostopni na spletu v jeziku postopka ali se predložijo skupaj s prevodom.
Article 25(1) EUTMIR requires that the translation reproduces the structure and contents of the original document. 
Člen 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe zahteva, da se prevod ujema z zgradbo in vsebino izvirnega dokumenta.
In the case of translations of online evidence of substantiation, the submission of the translation without the original will be accepted, as long as the document to which it refers is identified correctly. 
V primeru prevodov spletnih dokazov o utemeljitvi bo sprejeta predložitev prevoda brez izvirnega dokumenta, če je dokument, na katerega se prevod nanaša, pravilno opredeljen.
Any document in support of the application that is not translated by the applicant into the language of proceedings within the time limit specified in Article 16(2) EUTMDR will be deemed not to have been received by the Office, and therefore will not be taken into account (Article 25(2) EUTMIR) (05/03/2012, R 826/20104, MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 (fig.), § 25). 
V zvezi z vsemi dokumenti v podporo zahtevi, ki jih vložnik zahteve v roku iz člena 16(2) Delegirane uredbe, ne bo prevedel v jezik postopka, se bo štelo, da jih Urad ni prejel in se zato ne bodo upoštevali (člen 25(2) Izvedbene uredbe) (05/03/2012, R 826/20104, MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 (fig.), točka 25).
3.3.2.2 Other evidence 
Drugi dokazi
Any other evidence submitted by the applicant to substantiate the application, such as evidence showing use in the course of trade or evidence of reputation, will be subject to Article 24 EUTMIR, namely it will only have to be translated into the language of the proceedings at the Office's request within a period specified to that effect. 
Za vse druge dokaze, ki jih predloži vložnik za utemeljitev zahteve, kot so dokazi o uporabi v gospodarskem prometu ali dokazi o ugledu, se bo uporabljal člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe, in sicer jih bo treba prevesti le v jezik postopka na zahtevo Urada v roku, ki ga za to določi Urad.
3.3.3 Translation of observations submitted by the parties in the course of the proceedings 
Prevod pripomb, ki jih stranke predložijo med postopkom
Article 25(2)(a) EUTMIR 
Člen 25(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe
In written proceedings before the Office, a party who submits observations in a language of the Office other than the language of the proceedings has to submit a translation of those observations in the language of the proceedings within 1 month of the submission date (Article 146(9) EUTMR). 
Stranka, ki v pisnem postopku pred Uradom predloži pripombe v enem izmed uradnih jezikov Urada, ki ni jezik postopka, mora predložiti prevod teh pripomb v jeziku postopka v enem mesecu po dnevu vložitve (člen 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The Office will not ask for the translations and will proceed with the case. 
Urad ne bo posebej prosil za prevode in bo zadevo obravnaval naprej.
It is up to the party to submit the requisite translations. 
Za predložitev zahtevanih prevodov je odgovorna stranka.
If the translations are not submitted on the parties' initiative within the time limit of 1 month, the observations will be deemed not to have been received by the Office, and therefore will not be taken into account (Article 25(2)(a) EUTMIR). 
Če se prevodi na pobudo strank ne predložijo v enem mesecu, se bo štelo, da Urad pripomb ni prejel, in se zato ne bodo upoštevale (člen 25(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe).
Where a party submits observations in a language of the European Union that is not a language of the Office, the 1month time limit to translate the observations does not apply. 
Če stranka pripombe predloži v jeziku Evropske unije, ki ni jezik Urada, se enomesečni rok za prevod pripomb ne uporablja.
The observations will be deemed not to have been received from the outset, and will not be taken into account. 
Štelo se bo, da pripombe niso bile prejete od začetka, zato se ne bodo upoštevale.
3.3.4 Translation of evidence submitted by the EUTM proprietor in the course of the proceedings 
Prevod dokazov, ki jih imetnik blagovne znamke EU predloži med postopkom
Article 24 and Article 25(2)(a) EUTMIR 
Člen 24 in člen 25(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
The supporting documents submitted by the EUTM proprietor in the course of the proceedings (except for proof of use, see below) are subject to Article 24 EUTMIR, and therefore may be submitted in any official language of the European Union. 
Za dokaze, ki jih med postopkom predloži imetnik blagovne znamke EU (razen dokazov o uporabi, glej v nadaljevanju), se uporablja člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe in jih je zato mogoče predložiti v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije.
In accordance with this provision, the EUTM proprietor is not automatically obliged to submit a translation, but the Office may require it to do so within a time limit. 
V skladu s to določbo imetnik blagovne znamke EU ni samodejno zavezan k predložitvi prevoda, vendar lahko Urad zahteva, da to stori v določenem roku.
When exercising its discretion in this matter, the Office will take into account the nature of the evidence and the interests of the parties. 
Urad bo pri uveljavljanju svoje diskrecijske pravice glede tega vprašanja upošteval naravo dokazov in interese strank.
In cases where the Office does invite the EUTM proprietor to submit translations of the evidence, failure to do so within the specified time limit will mean that the untranslated documents will not be taken into account (Article 25(2)(a) EUTMIR). 
Če Urad imetnika blagovne znamke EU pozove, naj predloži prevode dokazov, in ta tega ne stori v določenem roku, to pomeni, da se neprevedeni dokumenti ne bodo upoštevali (člen 25(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe).
3.3.5 Translation of proof of use 
Prevod dokaza o uporabi
Article 19 EUTMDR 
Člen 19 Delegirane uredbe
According to Article 19(1) EUTMDR (to which Article 10(6) EUTMDR applies mutatis mutandis) and to Article 19(2) EUTMDR (to which Article 24 EUTMIR applies directly), evidence of use may be submitted in any official language of the European Union. 
V skladu s členom 19(1) Delegirane uredbe (v zvezi s katerim se smiselno uporablja člen 10(6) Delegirane uredbe) in členom 19(2) Delegirane uredbe (v zvezi s katerim se neposredno uporablja člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe) se lahko dokaz o uporabi predloži v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije.
Where the evidence of use is not in the language of the proceedings, the Office may require the party to submit a translation of the evidence into that language within a time limit specified by it. 
Kadar dokazi o uporabi niso v jeziku postopka, lahko Urad od stranke zahteva, da v roku, ki ga določi, predloži prevod dokazov v navedeni jezik.
In exercising its discretion in this matter, the Office will take into account the nature of the evidence and the interests of the parties. 
Urad bo pri uveljavljanju svoje diskrecijske pravice glede tega vprašanja upošteval naravo dokazov in interese strank.