natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court held that, where promotional items are handed out as a reward for the purchase of other goods and to encourage the sale of the latter, the mark loses its commercial raison d'être for the promotional goods and cannot be considered to have been genuinely used on the market for goods in that class (para. 22). 
Sodišče je odločilo, da če se promocijski izdelki brezplačno delijo za nagrajevanje nakupa drugega blaga in spodbujanje njegove prodaje, znamka izgubi komercialni razlog za obstoj za promocijske izdelke, zato ni mogoče šteti, da se je resno in dejansko uporabljala na trgu za blago iz navedenega razreda (točka 22).
The evidence produced to show genuine use of the mark at issue may include catalogues. 
Dokazi, predloženi za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi sporne blagovne znamke, lahko vsebujejo kataloge.
‘It must be pointed out that, in addition to items of clothing designated by different marks, more than 80 different items are offered for sale in that catalogue under the mark PETER STORM. 
„[…] je treba opozoriti, da se poleg oblačil, označenih z drugimi znamkami, v [katalogu] ponuja več kot 80 različnih izdelkov za prodajo pod znamko PETER STORM.
They comprise men's and women's jackets, jumpers, trousers, tee-shirts, footwear, socks, hats and gloves, the respective characteristics of which are briefly described. 
Gre za moške in ženske obleke, puloverje, hlače, majice, čevlje, nogavice, klobuke in rokavice, katerih značilnosti so na kratko opisane.
The earlier mark appears, in stylised characters, next to each item. 
Prejšnja znamka je v stilizirani pisavi natisnjena ob vsakem izdelku.
In that catalogue, the prices of the items in GBP and the reference number for each item are stated' (paras 3839). 
V tem katalogu so navedene cene izdelkov v GBP in referenca vsakega izdelka“ (točki 38 in 39).
The General Court found that the use of the sign Schuhpark for footwear on advertisements, bags and invoices was not meant to identify the origin of the shoes (which bore their own mark or no mark at all) but rather the company name or trade name of the shoe retailer. 
Splošno sodišče je ugotovilo, da namen uporabe znaka Schuhpark za obutev na oglasnih sporočilih, vrečkah in računih ni bil identificirati izvora čevljev (ki so bili opremljeni s svojo blagovno znamko ali z njo sploh niso bili opremljeni), temveč ime podjetja ali trgovsko ime trgovca z obutvijo na drobno.
This was considered insufficient to establish a link between the sign Schuhpark and the shoes. 
Štelo se je, da to ne zadostuje za opredelitev povezave med znakom Schuhpark in čevlji.
In other words, Schuhpark may well be a mark for the retail of shoes, but it was not used as a trade mark for goods (paras 3132). 
Z drugimi besedami, čeprav je Schuhpark znamka za prodajo obutve na drobno, se ni uporabljala kot blagovna znamka za blago (točki 31 in 32).
The earlier trade mark was registered in Class 42 for, inter alia, the services of a patent attorney. 
Prejšnja blagovna znamka je bila registrirana v razredu 42 za med drugim storitve patentnega zastopnika.
Its use on invoices, business cards and business correspondence was considered sufficient to show genuine use in connection with the services of a patent attorney. 
Štelo se je, da uporaba blagovne znamke na računih, poslovnih vizitkah in v poslovni korespondenci zadostuje kot dokaz o njeni resni in dejanski uporabi v zvezi s storitvami patentnega zastopnika.
The fact that there is no ‘direct bilateral link' between the publisher and the recipient of the services does not impair such a finding of genuine use. 
Dejstvo, da med založnikom in prejemnikom storitev ni nobene neposredne dvostranske povezave, ne vpliva na takšno ugotovitev obstoja resne in dejanske uporabe.
This is because the magazine is not distributed free of charge, which could lend credibility to the claim that payment of the price of the magazine constitutes remuneration for the service provided (paras 3135). 
Razlog je, da se revija ne distribuira brezplačno, kar bi lahko dalo težo trditvi, da plačilo cene revije pomeni plačilo za opravljeno storitev (točke od 31 do 35).
Services: services of a publishing company in Class 41. 
Storitve: storitve založb iz razreda 41.
The Board confirmed that the evidence (consisting of catalogues, press notes and advertisements) read in conjunction was enough to prove genuine use of the trade mark. 
Odbor za pritožbe je potrdil, da dokazi (ki zajemajo kataloge, sporočila za javnost in oglase), ki se berejo v zvezi s tem, zadostujejo za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi blagovne znamke.
‘Although the order record and the receipt of the bank account do not provide any information on how and to what extent the mark was used in Spain, the remaining documents, namely the catalogues, press notes and advertisements, when read in conjunction, demonstrate that during the relevant period, the opponent has published in Spain books and magazines under the trade mark BLUME. 
Čeprav evidenca naročil in izpisek z bančnega računa ne zagotavljata informacij, kako in v kakšnem obsegu se je znamka uporabljala v Španiji, preostali dokumenti, in sicer katalogi, sporočila za javnost in oglasi, če se berejo v zvezi s tem, dokazujejo, da je vložnik ugovora v upoštevnem obdobju v Španiji izdajal knjige in revije pod blagovno znamko BLUME.
Even if the opponent does not provide any invoices, orders or sales figures, there is some reason to assume that it advertised its books and magazines, promoted and sold them under the trade mark BLUME. 
Tudi če vložnik ugovora ne predloži računov, naročilnic ali podatkov o prodaji, obstajajo nekateri razlogi za domnevo, da je knjige in revije oglaševal, promoviral in prodajal pod blagovno znamko BLUME.
Although the advertising documents and the press notes were identified and dated by the opponent, the trade mark BLUME is always mentioned in the press notes and on the cover page of the quoted books. 
Čeprav je vložnik ugovora opredelil oglaševalske dokumente in sporočila za javnost ter jih opremil z datumom, je blagovna znamka BLUME vedno omenjena v sporočilih za javnost in na naslovnici navedenih knjig.
In addition, the text is in the Spanish language and the price mentioned in pesetas. 
Poleg tega je besedilo v španskem jeziku, navedene cene pa v pezetah.
When read together with the catalogues, these press notes demonstrate that they refer to some of the books expressly quoted in the catalogues' (para. 23). 
Če se ta sporočila za javnost berejo skupaj s katalogi, dokazujejo, da se nanašajo na nekatere od knjig, ki so izrecno navedene v katalogih (točka 23).
BIODANZA 13/04/2010, R 1149/20092, BIODANZA (fig.) / BIODANZA; confirmed 08/03/2012, T298/10, Biodanza, EU:T:2012:113 
BIODANZA 13/04/2010, R 1149/20092, BIODANZA (fig.) / BIODANZA; potrjena 08/03/2012, T298/10, Biodanza, EU:T:2012:113
It follows clearly from the finding of the contested decision that the evidence of use submitted by the opponent consists solely of advertisements that can prove only that the opponent advertised a yearly ‘BIODANZA' festival during the whole of the relevant period and workshops on both a regular and irregular basis from 2002. 
Iz ugotovitve izpodbijane odločbe očitno izhaja, da dokazi o uporabi, ki jih je predložil vložnik ugovora, zajemajo le oglase, ki lahko dokažejo le, da je v celotnem upoštevnem obdobju oglaševal letno prireditev „BIODANZA“, delavnice pa redno in neredno od leta 2002.
The mere existence of advertisements could, at most, make it probable or credible that the services advertised under the earlier mark were sold or, at least, offered for sale within the relevant territory, but it cannot prove this, as was unduly supposed by the contested decision. 
Le obstoj oglasov bi lahko kvečjemu prispeval k verjetnosti ali verodostojnosti dejstva, da so bile storitve, oglaševane pod prejšnjo znamko, prodane ali vsaj ponujene v prodajo na upoštevnem ozemlju, vendar tega ne more dokazati, kot se je neustrezno domnevalo v izpodbijani odločbi.
The opponent submitted ‘extracts from the opponent's websites for different countries'. 
Vložnik ugovora je predložil izvlečke s svojih spletnih strani za različne države.
WALZERTRAUM 17/01/2013, T355/09, Walzer Traum, EU:T:2013:22; confirmed 17/07/2014, C141/13 P, Walzer Traum, EU:C:2014:2089 
WALZERTRAUM 17/01/2013, T355/09, Walzer Traum, EU:T:2013:22; potrjena 17/07/2014, C141/13 P, Walzer Traum, EU:C:2014:2089
The opponent, a confectioner, which owns the German trade mark ‘WALZERTRAUM' for goods in Class 30, sought to prove the extent of use of its mark by submitting evidence relating to an advertising brochure published on the internet, which gives general information about its working methods, the ingredients used for its products and the product range, including its ‘WALZERTRAUM' chocolate. 
Vložnik ugovora, pekarna, ki je imetnik nemške blagovne znamke „WALZERTRAUM“ za blago iz razreda 30, je, da bi dokazal obseg uporabe svoje blagovne znamke, predložil dokaze v zvezi z oglaševalsko brošuro, ki je objavljena na spletu in v kateri so navedene splošne informacije o njegovih delovnih metodah, sestavinah, ki se uporabljajo za njegove izdelke, in ponudbi izdelkov, vključno s čokolado „WALZERTRAUM“.
However, the goods could not be ordered online via the web page. 
Vendar blaga ni bilo mogoče naročiti na spletni strani.
For this reason the General Court held that a connection between the website and the number of items sold could not be established (para. 47). 
Splošno sodišče je zato odločilo, da ni mogoče opredeliti povezave med spletno stranjo in številom prodanih izdelkov (točka 47).
The opponent has submitted, inter alia, internet extracts from the home pages of several tax consultancies using the opposing mark. 
Vložnik ugovora je med drugim predložil spletne izvlečke z domačih strani več družb za davčno svetovanje, ki so uporabljale znamko, na kateri temelji ugovor.
The General Court considered that the indications on the internet pages allowed the reader to establish a link between the trade mark and the services provided (paras 3940). 
Splošno sodišče je menilo, da so navedbe na spletnih straneh bralcu omogočale povezovanje blagovne znamke in zagotovljenih storitev (točki 39 in 40).
‘[E]xcerpts from third parties' websites, despite having been printed out on 10 June 2008, contain consumers' comments about ‘SKUNKFUNK' clothes and shops dated within the relevant period. 
Izvlečki s spletnih strani tretjih oseb, čeprav so bili natisnjeni 10. junija 2008, vključujejo pripombe strank o oblačilih in trgovinah „SKUNKFUNK“, ki so bile datirane v upoštevnem obdobju.
In particular, as regards the relevant territory, the documents show various comments made by consumers in Spain and dated December 2004 and February-March-April-May-July 2007. 
Zlasti v zvezi z upoštevnim ozemljem dokumenti vsebujejo različne pripombe strank iz Španije iz decembra 2004 ter februarja, marca, aprila, maja in julija 2007.
Moreover, as the Opposition Division pointed out, a blog comment (dated 4 March 2007) on the Internet page www.cybereuskadi.com mentions that the opponent (‘designer of Skunkfunk') “exports surf clothes worldwide and has a turnover of nearly 7 million euros per year”' (para. 21). 
Kot je poleg tega poudaril oddelek za ugovore, je v pripombi iz spletnega dnevnika (z dne 4. marca 2007) na spletni strani www.cybereuskadi.com navedeno, da vložnik ugovora („oblikovalec oblačil Skunkfunk“) izvaža oblačila za deskanje po vsem svetu in ima letni promet v višini skoraj 7 milijonov EUR (točka 21).
Case No Earlier trade mark Comment 
Št. zadeve Prejšnja znamka Pripomba
11/05/2006, C416/04 P, Vitafruit VITAFRUT Use considered sufficient, even though the earlier Spanish mark was not present in a substantial part of the territory of Spain as the evidence referred to the sale of everyday consumer goods (concentrated fruit juices) to only a single customer in Spain (paras 60, 66 and 76). 
11/05/2006, C416/04 P, C416/04 P VITAFRUT Uporaba se je štela za zadostno, čeprav prejšnja španska znamka ni bila prisotna na večjem delu ozemlja Španije, glede na to, da so se dokazi nanašali na prodajo običajnega potrošniškega blaga (koncentriranih sadnih sokov) samo eni stranki v Španiji (točke 60, 66 in 76).
04/06/2015, T254/13, EU:T:2015:156 STAYER Genuine use may result from the export to a single operator located outside Europe, who can be an intermediary, for the purpose of selling to the end consumer in a non-EU country. 
04/06/2015, T254/13, EU:T:2015:156 STAYER Resna in dejanska uporaba lahko izhaja iz izvoza enemu gospodarskemu subjektu s sedežem zunaj Unije, ki je lahko posrednik, za namene prodaje proizvodov končnemu potrošniku v tretji državi.
Proof that the products have been put on the market in the non-EU importing country is not required (paras 57-61). 
Dokaza, da se proizvodi dajejo na trg v državi uvoznici, ki je tretja država, ni treba predložiti (točke od 57 do 61).
14/07/2010, R 602/20092 RED BARON The Board indicated that sales in Austria and Great Britain from the Netherlands also constituted genuine use in the Netherlands (para. 42). 
14/07/2010, R 602/20092 RED BARON Odbor za pritožbe je navedel, da tudi prodaja nizozemskega blaga v Avstriji in Veliki Britaniji pomeni resno in dejansko uporabo (točka 42).
18/03/2015,T250/13, SMART WATER The test sales of 15 000 water bottles are considered symbolic in the light of the size of the European market (para. 34-35). 
18/03/2015,T250/13, SMART WATER Testna prodaja 15 000 steklenic vode se glede na velikost evropskega trga šteje za simbolično (točki 34 in 35).
16/07/2014, T196/13, NAMMU, EU:T:2014:1065 The applicant provided an affidavit signed by the Head of the Import Department and Quality Manager, as well as photos, including one of a Nanu-Nana shop front, and others, undated, of various goods, such as folded paper boxes, albums, calendars, stickers, blocks, artists' materials, cards and other paper products, napkins, recipe books, furniture and home decor articles. 
16/07/2014, T196/13, NAMMU, EU:T:2014:1065 Vložnik zahteve je predložil zapriseženo izjavo, ki sta jo podpisala vodja oddelka za uvoz in vodja kakovosti, ter fotografije, vključno s fotografijo pročelja trgovine Nanu-Nana in druge nedatirane fotografije raznega blaga, kot so nesestavljene papirne škatle, albumi, koledarji, nalepke, pisalni bloki, potrebščine za umetnike, voščilnice in drugi izdelki iz papirja, serviete, knjige z recepti, pohištvo in proizvodi za notranjo opremo.
The goods depicted all bear labels and stickers with the earlier mark on their packaging. 
Vse prikazano blago je opremljeno z etiketami in nalepkami s prejšnjo znamko na svoji embalaži.
No evidence was submitted to prove the turnover figures given in the affidavits, and the photos were undated (para. 33). 
Predloženi niso bili nobeni dokazi, ki bi dokazovali podatke o prometu iz zapriseženih izjav, poleg tega so bile fotografije nedatirane (točka 33).
17/01/2013, T355/09, Walzer Traum, EU:T:2013:22; confirmed 17/07/2014, C141/13 P, Walzer Traum The opponent, a German bakery located in a city of 18 000 inhabitants, proved constant monthly sales of approximately 3.6 kg of exclusive, handmade chocolates over a period of 22 months. 
17/01/2013, T355/09, Walzer Traum, EU:T:2013:22; potrjena 17/07/2014, C141/13 P, Walzer Traum Vložnik ugovora, nemška pekarna iz mesta z 18 000 prebivalci, je dokazala stalni mesečni obseg prodaje, in sicer približno 3,6 kg ekskluzivnih, ročno izdelanih čokoladnih bonbonov v 22-mesečnem obdobju.
Despite being advertised on a web page accessible throughout the world, the chocolates could only be ordered and bought in the opponent's bakery. 
Čeprav so se čokoladni bonboni oglaševali na spletni strani, ki je dostopna z vsega sveta, jih je bilo mogoče naročiti in kupiti le v pekarni vložnika ugovora.
In view of the territorial and quantitative limits, the General Court considered that use had not been sufficiently proven (para. 32 et seq.). 
Splošno sodišče je zaradi ozemeljskih in količinskih omejitev menilo, da uporaba ni bila zadostno dokazana (točka 32 in naslednje).
30/04/2008, T131/06, Sonia Sonia Rykiel, EU:T:2008:135 54 units of women's slips and 31 units of petticoats were sold over a period of 13 months, for a total sum of EUR 432. 
30/04/2008, T131/06, Sonia Sonia Rykiel, EU:T:2008:135 V 13-mesečnem obdobju je bilo prodanih 54 ženskih kombinež in 31 spodnjih kril v skupnem znesku 432 EUR.
The General Court considered these modest quantities with regard to the relevant market (everyday consumption goods, sold at a very reasonable price) to be insufficient. 
Splošno sodišče je menilo, da je ta skromna količina glede na upoštevni trg (potrošniško blago, ki se prodaja po zelo sprejemljivi ceni) nezadostna.
27/02/2009, R 249/20084, AMAZING ELASTIC PLASTIC II 500 plastic balloon kits given away as ‘samples' free of charge cannot constitute genuine use. 
27/02/2009, R 249/20084, AMAZING ELASTIC PLASTIC II 500 plastičnih balonov, ki so se brezplačno razdeljevali kot vzorci, ne more pomeniti resne in dejanske uporabe.
20/04/2001, R 378/20001, RINASCIMENTO/RENACIMIENTO The Board of Appeal confirmed the decision of the Opposition Division that the submission of one bill of lading showing the delivery of 40 packages of sherry is insufficient to prove genuine use. 
20/04/2001, R 378/20001, RINASCIMENTO/RENACIMIENTO Odbor za pritožbe je potrdil odločbo oddelka za ugovore, da predložitev ene nakladnice, ki dokazuje dostavo 40 škatel šerija, ne zadostuje za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi.
09/02/2012, R 239/20111, GOLF WORLD (fig.9 / GOLF WORLD et al. (B 1 456 443, Golf World) As the only evidence of use for printed matter, the opponent submitted evidence that proved 14 subscribers for a magazine in Sweden. 
09/02/2012, R 239/20111, GOLF WORLD (fig.9 / GOLF WORLD et al. (B 1 456 443, Golf World) Vložnik ugovora je kot edini dokaz o uporabi za tiskovine predložil dokaz o 14 naročnikih na revijo na Švedskem.
The OD held that this is insufficient to prove genuine use in Sweden, particularly taking account of the fact that magazines are not high-priced articles. 
Oddelek za ugovore je menil, da to ne zadostuje za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi na Švedskem, zlasti ob upoštevanju dejstva, da revije niso izdelki z visoko ceno.
20/05/2011, R 2132/20102, SUSURRO (fig.) / SUSURRO Nine invoices concerning the sale of wine in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, showing that over a period of 36 months, goods marketed under the earlier mark and worth EUR 4 286.36 were sold, as well as an undated sample of a product label, were not considered sufficient proof of genuine use of a Spanish trade mark registered for alcoholic drinks (except beers) in Class 33. 
20/05/2011, R 2132/20102, SUSURRO (fig.) / SUSURRO Upoštevalo se je, da devet računov v zvezi s prodajo vina v letih 2005, 2006, 2007 in 2008, iz katerih je razvidno, da je bilo v 36 mesecih pod prejšnjo znamko trženo in prodano blago v vrednosti 4 286,36 EUR, in nedatiran vzorec etikete izdelka niso zadosten dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi španske blagovne znamke, registrirane za alkoholne pijače (razen piva) iz razreda 33.
The evidence showed that the sales of wine had been made in a small, very provincial, part of Spain. 
Iz dokazov je bilo razvidno, da je prodaja vina potekala na zelo majhnem in zelo provincialnem delu Španije.
For a country with over 40 million inhabitants, the amount sold of a relatively cheap wine was found to be too small to create or preserve an outlet for goods (wine) that are consumed in large quantities by the average Spanish consumer. 
Upoštevalo se je, da je količina prodanega razmeroma poceni vina za državo z več kot 40 milijoni prebivalcev premajhna, da bi ustvarila ali ohranjala trg za zadevno blago (vino), ki ga povprečni španski potrošnik porabi v velikih količinah.
07/07/2011, R 908/20102, ALFA-REN / ALPHA D3 et al. Table of sales figures for ALFACALCIDOL products in Lithuania between 2005 and 2008, indicating products sold by Teva Corp. under the trade mark ‘ALPHA D3' (source: IMS health database, Lithuania); an undated copy of packaging for a product ‘ALPHA D3' (undated); and a copy of an advertisement for ‘ALPHA D3' products sold in Lithuania (not translated) were found insufficient to show genuine use of the mark in Lithuania. 
07/07/2011, R 908/20102, ALFA-REN / ALPHA D3 et al. Preglednica s podatki o prodaji za proizvode ALFACALCIDOL v Litvi med letoma 2005 in 2008, v kateri so navedeni proizvodi, ki jih je podjetje Teva Corp. prodajalo pod blagovno znamko „ALPHA D3“ (vir: zdravstvena podatkovna zbirka IMS, Litva), nedatirana kopija embalaže za proizvod „ALPHA D3“ (brez datuma) in kopija oglasa za proizvode „ALPHA D3“, ki so bili naprodaj v Litvi (neprevedena), štelo se je, da navedeno ni zadosten dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi blagovne znamke v Litvi.
It could not be seen from the evidence submitted whether the marked goods were actually distributed and, if so, the quantities involved. 
Iz predloženih dokazov ni bilo razvidno, ali je bilo blago, ki ga označuje znamka, dejansko distribuirano in če je odgovor pritrdilen, kakšne so zadevne količine blaga.
16/03/2011, R 820/20101, BE YOU / BEYU Sales of goods with profits below EUR 200 during the 9month period of use were not considered sufficient proof of genuine use of the opposing mark in respect of the goods in Class 14. 
16/03/2011, R 820/20101, BE YOU / BEYU Štelo se je, da prodaja blaga z dobičkom manj kot 200 EUR v devetmesečnem obdobju uporabe ni zadosten dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znamke, na kateri temelji ugovor, v zvezi z blagom iz razreda 14.
06/04/2011, R 999/20101, TAUTROPFEN CHARISMA (fig.) / CHARISMA Eleven invoices showing that 13 units of perfumery goods were sold in Spain between 2003 and 2005, for a total amount of EUR 84.63, were deemed as insufficient proof of genuine use of the sign. 
06/04/2011, R 999/20101, TAUTROPFEN CHARISMA (fig.) / CHARISMA Štelo se je, da enajst računov, iz katerih je bilo razvidno, da je bilo v Španiji med letoma 2003 in 2005 prodanih 13 enot parfumerijskega blaga v skupni vrednosti 84,63 EUR, ni zadosten dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znaka.
Account has been taken of the fact that the goods were intended for daily use and available at a very affordable price. 
Štelo se je, da je bilo blago namenjeno za vsakodnevno uporabo in na voljo po zelo sprejemljivi ceni.
27/10/2008, B 1 118 605, Viña la Rosa Photocopies of three independent wine guides mentioning the opponent's trade mark (without further explanation as to the volume, edition, publisher, etc.) were not considered sufficient to prove use for wines. 
27/10/2008, B 1 118 605, Viña la Rosa Štelo se je, da fotokopije iz treh neodvisnih enoloških vodnikov, v katerih je bila omenjena blagovna znamka vložnika ugovora (brez dodatnih pojasnil v zvezi z zvezkom, izdajo, založbo itd.), niso zadosten dokaz o uporabi znamke za vina.
21/06/1999, B 70 716, Oregon The Opposition Division found an invoice for 180 pairs of shoes as insufficient to prove genuine use. 
21/06/1999, B 70 716, Oregon Oddelek za ugovore je menil, da račun za 180 parov čevljev ni zadosten dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znamke.
30/01/2001, B 193 716, Lynx As evidence of use the opponent submitted two invoices, for a total amount of 122 items of clothing, and four undated labels with no indication of what goods they were to be affixed to. 
30/01/2001, B 193 716, Lynx Vložnik ugovora je kot dokaz o uporabi predložil dva računa za skupaj 122 kosov oblačil in štiri nedatirane etikete brez navedbe, na katero blago so bile nameščene.
The Opposition Division considered them insufficient. 
Oddelek za ugovore je menil, da ti dokazi niso zadostni.