natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5.5.1 Cases in which a decision on costs must be taken 
Primeri, v katerih je treba sprejeti odločitev o stroških
Article 6(4) EUTMDR 
Člen 6(4) Delegirane uredbe
A decision on costs is taken in opposition proceedings that have passed the cooling-off period, that is to say, where the adversarial part of the proceedings has both started and come to an end. 
Odločitev o stroških se sprejme v postopku ugovora, ki se je nadaljeval po obdobju za pobotanje, tj. ko se je začel in končal kontradiktorni del postopka.
If a decision on substance is taken, the decision on apportionment of costs is given at the end of the decision. 
Če se sprejme meritorna odločba, je odločitev o porazdelitvi stroškov navedena na koncu odločbe.
In all other cases where the Opposition Division closes the case, a decision on costs is issued together with the closure letters unless the parties have informed the Office about an agreement on costs. 
V vseh drugih primerih, kadar zadevo konča oddelek za ugovore, se odločitev o stroških izda skupaj z dopisi o končanju postopka, razen če sta stranki Urad obvestili o dogovoru o stroških.
5.5.2 Cases in which a decision on costs is not taken 
Primeri, v katerih se odločitev o stroških ne sprejme
No decision on costs is taken for oppositions that are closed before or during the cooling-off period. 
Odločitev o stroških se ne sprejme pri ugovorih, ki se končajo pred obdobjem za pobotanje ali med njim.
5.5.2.1 Agreement on costs 
Dogovor o stroških
Article 109(6) EUTMR 
Člen 109(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Whenever the parties have settled the opposition proceedings with an agreement that includes the costs, the Office will not issue a decision on costs. 
Kadar stranki sporazumno končata postopek ugovora z dogovorom, ki vključuje stroške, Urad ne bo sprejel odločitve o stroških.
The same is true if the Office receives information signed by both parties stating that the parties have agreed on costs. 
Enako velja, če Urad prejme obvestilo, ki sta ga podpisali obe stranki in v katerem je navedeno, da sta se dogovorili o stroških.
Such a request can also be sent in two separate letters to the Office. 
Takšno zahtevo je Uradu mogoče poslati tudi v dveh ločenih dopisih.
This information must be received before the Office has confirmed the closure of the proceedings. 
Urad mora to obvestilo prejeti, preden potrdi končanje postopka.
If the parties settle the opposition by mutual agreement, they are free not to include the cost issue. 
Če stranki dosežeta sporazumno rešitev ugovora, se lahko prosto odločita, da ta rešitev ne bo vključevala vprašanja stroškov.
If no indication is given as to whether the parties have agreed on the costs, the Office will take a decision on costs immediately, together with its confirmation of the withdrawal/restriction. 
Če ni nikjer navedeno, ali sta se stranki dogovorili o stroških, bo Urad nemudoma sprejel odločitev o stroških skupaj s potrditvijo umika/omejitve.
If the parties inform the Office that they have reached an agreement on costs after the withdrawal/restriction, the decision already issued on costs will not be revised by the Office. 
Če stranki Urad obvestita, da sta se o stroških dogovorili po umiku/omejitvi, Urad ne bo spremenil že sprejete odločitve o stroških.
It is left to the parties to respect the agreement and not to ‘execute' the Office's decision on costs. 
Stranki se lahko sami odločita, da bosta upoštevali dogovor in ne bosta izvršili odločitve Urada o stroških.
5.5.2.2 Information from potential ‘successful party' 
Informacije stranke, ki bo verjetno uspela v postopku
When the party that would be entitled to be awarded costs according to the general rules described in paragraph 5.5.3 below informs the Office that it accepts each party bearing their own costs, no decision on costs is necessary. 
Kadar stranka, ki bi bila upravičena do povrnitve stroškov v skladu s splošnimi pravili, opisanimi v odstavku 5.5.3 v nadaljevanju, Urad obvesti, da se strinja s tem, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške, odločitev o stroških ni potrebna.
The Office will refrain from taking a decision on costs whenever the potential ‘successful party' informs the Office that it agrees to share the costs, even if the ‘losing party' does not confirm its agreement. 
Urad ne bo sprejel odločitve o stroških, kadar ga stranka, ki bo verjetno uspela v postopku, obvesti, da se strinja z delitvijo stroškov, tudi če stranka, ki ni uspela v postopku, ne potrdi svojega strinjanja.
The latest letters from both parties therefore have to be checked carefully before issuing a decision. 
Pred sprejetjem odločitve je zato treba skrbno preveriti zadnje dopise obeh strank.
However, any such request sent by the losing party to the Office will simply be forwarded to the other party, and the decision on costs will be taken ex officio under normal rules. 
Vendar bo vsaka takšna zahteva, ki jo Uradu pošlje stranka, ki ni uspela v postopku, poslana drugi stranki, odločitev o stroških pa bo sprejeta po uradni dolžnosti na podlagi običajnih pravil.
5.5.3 Standard cases of decisions on costs 
Standardni primeri odločitev o stroških
The general rule is that the party that terminates the proceedings, by withdrawing the EUTM application (wholly or partially) or by withdrawing the opposition, will bear the fees incurred by the other party as well as all costs incurred by it that are essential to the proceedings. 
Splošno pravilo je, da stranka, ki konča postopek z (popolnim ali delnim) umikom prijave blagovne znamke EU ali z umikom ugovora, plača pristojbine in stroške, ki so nastali drugi stranki in so nujni za potek postopka.
If both parties lose in part, a ‘different apportionment' has to be decided. 
Če obe stranki izgubita v nekaterih delih, je treba določiti drugačno porazdelitev.
As a general rule, it is equitable that each party bears its own costs. 
Praviloma je pravično, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške.
A party that terminates the proceedings is deemed to have given in. 
Za stranko, ki konča postopek, se šteje, da se je vdala.
The hypothetical outcome of the case if a decision on substance had become necessary is absolutely irrelevant. 
Hipotetičen izid zadeve, če bi bila potrebna meritorna odločba, je popolnoma nepomemben.
In standard cases the result is the following. 
V standardnih primerih je izid naslednji.
The applicant withdraws or restricts its application to the goods and services the opposition is not directed at (partial withdrawal). 
Prijavitelj umakne ali omeji svojo prijavo na blago in storitve, zoper katere ugovor ni usmerjen (delni umik).
In these cases the applicant has to pay the costs. 
V takšnem primeru mora prijavitelj plačati stroške.
The opponent withdraws its opposition without any restriction of the EUTM application as regards the contested goods and services after the cooling-off period. 
Vložnik ugovora umakne svoj ugovor po izteku obdobja za pobotanje, ne da bi bila prijava blagovne znamke EU kakor koli omejena v zvezi z izpodbijanim blagom in storitvami.
The opponent has to pay the costs. 
Stroške mora plačati vložnik ugovora.
Restriction of the application followed by withdrawal of the opposition (28/04/2004, T124/02 & T156/02, Vitataste, EU:T:2004:116, § 56). 
Omejitev prijave, ki ji sledi umik ugovora (28/04/2004, T124/02 & T156/02, Vitataste, EU:T:2004:116, § 56).
In principle each party bears its own costs. 
Načeloma vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške.
A different apportionment of costs can, however, be justified for reasons of equity (for example, if the application was restricted only to a very small extent). 
Vendar je lahko zaradi pravičnosti upravičena drugačna porazdelitev stroškov (npr. če je bila prijava omejena le v zelo majhnem obsegu).
The Office will not take into account parties' arguments as to who should pay. 
Urad ne bo upošteval navedb strank glede tega, kdo bi moral plačati stroške.
5.5.4 Cases that did not proceed to judgment 
Zadeve, v katerih se razsojanje ni nadaljevalo
5.5.4.1 Multiple oppositions 
Več ugovorov
Complete rejection of the EUTM application 
Popolna zavrnitev prijave blagovne znamke EU
In cases where there are multiple oppositions against the same EUTM application that have not been suspended by the Office in accordance with Article 9(2) EUTMDR, and one opposition leads to the rejection of the EUTM application, the Office does not take any action in the other oppositions until the appeal period has elapsed. 
Kadar je zoper isto prijavo blagovne znamke EU vloženih več ugovorov in jih Urad ni začasno ustavil v skladu s členom 9(2) Delegirane uredbe, pri čemer en ugovor vodi do zavrnitve prijave blagovne znamke EU, Urad ne sprejme nobenih ukrepov v drugih ugovorih, dokler se ne izteče rok za pritožbo.
If the appeal period elapses without an appeal being filed, the Office closes the other opposition proceedings and the cases do not proceed to judgment. 
Če se rok za pritožbo izteče, ne da bi bila vložena pritožba, Urad konča druge postopke ugovora in razsojanje se v teh zadevah ne nadaljuje.
In this case, the determination of costs is at the discretion of the Opposition Division (Article 109(5) EUTMR). 
V tem primeru je določitev stroškov v diskreciji oddelka za ugovore (člen 109(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The Office is not able to determine who the ‘winning or losing party' is, and the applicant should not be required to pay the costs of several other opponents if it loses in one decision on substance. 
Urad ne more določiti, kdo je stranka, ki je uspela, ali stranka, ki ni uspela, pri čemer se od prijavitelja ne sme zahtevati, naj plača stroške več drugih vložnikov ugovorov, če izgubi na podlagi ene meritorne odločbe.
Therefore, applying a principle of equity, each party will be ordered to bear its own costs. 
Zato bo na podlagi načela pravičnosti vsaki stranki naloženo plačilo svojih stroškov.
Partial rejection of the EUTM application 
Delna zavrnitev prijave blagovne znamke EU
In cases of multiple oppositions that are partially directed against the same goods and services of the contested trade mark, the opposition decision taken first may affect the other oppositions. 
V primerih več ugovorov, ki so delno usmerjeni zoper isto blago in storitve izpodbijane blagovne znamke, lahko odločba o ugovoru, ki je sprejeta prva, vpliva na druge ugovore.
Opposition A is directed against Class 1 and opposition B against Classes 1 and 2 of the contested EUTM application. 
Ugovor A je usmerjen zoper razred 1, ugovor B pa zoper razreda 1 in 2 izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU.
A decision is taken first in opposition A rejecting the contested application for Class 1. 
Odločba se najprej sprejme v zvezi z ugovorom A, saj se z njo zavrne izpodbijana prijava za razred 1.
When the decision is notified to the parties of opposition A, opposition B must be suspended until the decision in opposition A is final and binding. 
Ko je odločba vročena strankama ugovora A, je treba ugovor B začasno ustaviti, dokler odločba v zvezi z ugovorom A ni dokončna in zavezujoča.
Once the decision is final, the opponent of opposition B will be invited to inform the Office whether it wishes to maintain or withdraw its opposition in view of the amendment of the list of goods. 
Ko je odločba dokončna, bo vložnik ugovora B pozvan, naj Urad obvesti, ali želi ob upoštevanju spremembe seznama blaga vztrajati pri svojem ugovoru ali ga umakniti.
If the opponent withdraws the opposition, the case is closed. 
Če vložnik ugovora umakne ugovor, je zadeva končana.
In this situation, and if the case is closed after commencement of the adversarial part of the proceedings, the Office will issue a decision on costs in accordance with Article 109(3) EUTMR. 
V takšnem primeru in če je zadeva končana po začetku kontradiktornega dela postopka, bo Urad sprejel odločitev o stroških v skladu s členom 109(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The opponent withdrew its opposition following the partial rejection of the contested trade mark. 
Vložnik ugovora je ugovor umaknil po delni zavrnitvi izpodbijane znamke.
To this extent the opponent was successful in the proceedings. 
V tem smislu je vložnik ugovora uspel v postopku.
However, the partial rejection of the trade mark was more restricted than the scope of the opposition. 
Vendar je bila delna zavrnitev znamke bolj omejena kot obseg ugovora.
To this extent the applicant/holder was also successful in the proceedings. 
V tem smislu je tudi prijavitelj/imetnik uspel v postopku.
Consequently, it is equitable that each party should bear its own costs. 
Zato je pravično, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške.
If the opponent maintains its opposition after the partial rejection, the proceedings continue and in the final decision on the substance the decision on costs is taken according to the normal rules. 
Če vložnik ugovora po delni zavrnitvi vztraja pri svojem ugovoru, se postopek nadaljuje, v končni meritorni odločbi pa se o stroških odloči na podlagi običajnih pravil.
5.5.4.2 Rejection of an application on the basis of absolute grounds or formalities 
Zavrnitev prijave na podlagi absolutnih razlogov ali formalnosti
An EUTM application can be rejected during an opposition procedure on absolute grounds for refusal (either on the basis of third party observations, Article 45 EUTMR, or ex officio if the case is reopened) or on formalities (e.g. if an applicant from outside the EEA is no longer represented under Article 119(2) EUTMR). 
Prijava blagovne znamke EU se lahko zavrne med postopkom ugovora na podlagi absolutnih razlogov za zavrnitev (na podlagi pripomb tretjih oseb, člen 45 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ali po uradni dolžnosti, če je zadeva znova odprta) ali na podlagi formalnosti (npr. če prijavitelj, ki ni iz EGP, nima več zastopnika na podlagi člena 119(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Once the rejection becomes final, the opposition proceedings are closed by issuing a notification. 
Ko je zavrnitev dokončna, se postopek ugovora konča, tako da se pošlje uradno obvestilo.
In these situations the practice on costs is as follows. 
V takšnih primerih je praksa pri stroških naslednja.
If the refusal becomes final after the expiry of the cooling-off period, a decision on costs is taken pursuant to Article 109(5) EUTMR. 
Če zavrnitev postane dokončna po izteku obdobja za pobotanje, se odločitev o stroških sprejme v skladu s členom 109(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
If the same situation arises before commencement of the adversarial part, no decision on costs is to be taken. 
Če tak položaj nastane pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela, se odločitev o stroških ne sprejme.
5.5.4.3 Cases of joinder 
Združitev zadev
Article 9 EUTMDR 
Člen 9 Delegirane uredbe
For further information on joinder, see paragraph 6.4.3, Joinder of proceedings, below. 
Za dodatne informacije o združitvi zadev glej odstavek 6.4.3 v nadaljevanju, Združitev postopkov.
In cases where the joint opposition succeeds in its entirety the applicant should pay the opposition fees paid by each of the opponents but representation costs only once. 
Kadar skupni ugovor uspe v celoti, mora prijavitelj plačati pristojbine za ugovor, ki jih je plačal vsak od vložnikov ugovora, stroške zastopanja pa samo enkrat.
If the applicant wins, its representation costs will be awarded once but each of the joint opponents will be liable for them. 
Če v postopku uspe prijavitelj, bodo stroški zastopanja odobreni enkrat, vendar bo zanje odgovoren vsak od skupnih vložnikov ugovora.
A different apportionment of costs might be equitable. 
Pravična je lahko različna porazdelitev stroškov.
In cases of partial success or if equitable for other reasons, each party should bear its own costs. 
V primeru delnega uspeha ali če je to pravično iz drugih razlogov, mora vsaka stranka nositi svoje stroške.
5.5.4.4 The meaning of ‘bear one's own costs' 
Pomen izraza nositi svoje stroške
The notion of costs comprises the opposition fee and the costs essential to the proceedings, as referred to in Article 109(1) EUTMR. 
Pojem stroškov obsega pristojbino za ugovor in stroške, ki so nujni za potek postopka, kot je navedeno v členu 109(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
In most cases the costs cover the remuneration of an agent within the limits of the scales set by the Regulation. 
V večini primerov stroški krijejo plačilo za posrednika v okviru tarif iz uredbe.
‘Each party shall bear their own costs' means that no party has a claim against the other party. 
„Vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške“ pomeni, da nobena stranka nima zahteve do druge stranke.
5.6 Fixing of costs 
Določitev stroškov
Article 109(7) EUTMR 
Člen 109(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Where the costs are limited to representation costs and the opposition fee, the decision fixing the amount of costs will be included in the decision on the apportionment of the costs (i.e. as a rule, in the decision on substance). 
Če so stroški omejeni na stroške zastopanja in pristojbino za ugovor, bo odločitev o določitvi zneska stroškov vključena v odločitev o porazdelitvi stroškov (tj. praviloma v meritorno odločbo).
This means that in the vast majority of cases, it will not be necessary to fix the amount of costs separately. 
To pomeni, da zneska stroškov v veliki večini primerov ne bo treba določiti posebej.
The only exceptions are: 
Edine izjeme so:
when an oral hearing took place; 
če je bilo opravljeno ustno zaslišanje,
when the fixing of costs was inadvertently omitted (‘forgotten') in the main decision. 
če je bila določitev stroškov v glavni odločbi nenamerno izpuščena (pozabljena).
5.6.1 Amounts to be reimbursed/fixed 
Zneski, ki jih je treba povrniti/določiti
Article 85(1) and (6) EUTMDR 
Člen 85(1) in (6) Delegirane uredbe
The amount to be reimbursed is always fixed in euros, regardless of the currency in which the party had to pay its representative. 
Znesek, ki ga je treba povrniti, je vedno določen v evrih, in sicer ne glede na valuto, v kateri je morala stranka plačati svojega zastopnika.
If the opponent wins, the opposition fee will be reimbursed. 
Če v postopku uspe vložnik ugovora, bo pristojbina za ugovor povrnjena.
As regards representation costs, the amount is limited to EUR 300. 
Pri stroških zastopanja je znesek omejen na 300 EUR.
This applies both to the opponent and the applicant, provided that they were represented in the opposition procedure by a professional representative within the meaning of Article 120(1) EUTMR, irrespective of whether these costs have actually been incurred. 
To velja za vložnika ugovora in prijavitelja, če ju je v postopku ugovora zastopal poklicni zastopnik v smislu člena 120(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, in sicer ne glede na to, ali so ti stroški dejansko nastali.
If the winning party was represented at some stage of the proceedings by a professional representative, but is no longer represented at the time of taking the decision on costs, it is also entitled to an award of costs regardless of when in the proceedings professional representation ceased. 
Če je stranko, ki je uspela v postopku, v neki fazi postopka zastopal poklicni zastopnik, vendar v času sprejetja odločitve o stroških nima več zastopnika, je prav tako upravičena do odobritve stroškov, in sicer ne glede na to, kdaj v postopku se je poklicno zastopanje prenehalo.
Representation costs for employees, even from another company with economic connections, are not reimbursable and will not be fixed. 
Stroški zastopanja za zaposlene, tudi iz drugega podjetja, s katerim je stranka gospodarsko povezana, niso povračljivi in ne bodo določeni.
They will not be addressed in the decision on costs. 
V odločitvi o stroških ne bodo obravnavani.
For further information on representation, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 5, Professional Representation. 
Za dodatne informacije o zastopanju glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 5: Poklicno zastopanje.
In the case of a joinder under Article 9(1) EUTMDR, where the oppositions are successful, the Office will fix both (or all) opposition fees (one for each opposition) but only one representation fee. 
Če so v primeru združenih zadev v skladu s členom 9(1) Delegirane uredbe ugovori uspešni, bo Urad določil obe (ali vse) pristojbini(-e) za ugovor, vendar le en znesek za zastopanje.
As regards the costs of the opposition procedure, one single decision on the apportionment and on the fixing of costs must be taken for the opposition procedure as a whole. 
V zvezi s stroški postopka ugovora mora biti sprejeta ena sama odločitev o porazdelitvi in določitvi stroškov za postopek ugovora kot celoto.
When a decision is annulled by the Boards of Appeal and remitted to the Opposition Division, the Opposition Division has to decide on the case again and will take a decision on and fix the costs in the usual way. 
Če odbori za pritožbe razveljavijo odločitev in zadevo vrnejo v odločanje oddelku za ugovore, mora oddelek za ugovore znova odločati o zadevi, pri čemer bo o stroških odločil in jih določil, kot je običajno.
If this decision is appealed again (and not remitted for a second time) the Board will decide on and fix the costs in the usual way. 
Če je zoper to odločbo znova vložena pritožba (o kateri se ne odloča znova), bo odbor o stroških odločil in jih določil kot običajno.
5.6.2 Procedure if the fixing of costs is contained in the main decision 
Postopek, če so stroški določeni v glavni odločbi
Where the decision fixing the amount of costs is included in the decision on the apportionment of the costs, no bill or proof whatsoever is needed. 
Če je odločitev o določitvi zneska stroškov vključena v odločitev o porazdelitvi stroškov, ni potreben nikakršen obračun stroškov ali dokaz.
The Office knows that the opposition fee was paid and, if there is a representative, EUR 300 must be awarded irrespective of any evidence. 
Urad ve, da je bila pristojbina za ugovor plačana, in če obstaja zastopnik, je treba ne glede na kakršne koli dokaze odobriti 300 EUR.
It is assumed that the costs of representation have been of at least EUR 300. 
Predpostavlja se, da so stroški zastopanja znašali najmanj 300 EUR.
Therefore, no correspondence with the parties about the amount to be fixed is necessary. 
Zato ni potrebno nikakršno dopisovanje s strankama glede zneska, ki ga je treba določiti.
The fixing of the amount is automatic. 
Znesek se določi samodejno.
5.6.3 Procedure if a separate fixing of costs is needed 
Postopek, če je treba stroške določiti posebej
The following procedural requirements apply in the rare cases where a separate fixing of costs must be made (including when it was inadvertently omitted, in which case the party concerned must also comply with the applicable requirements): 
V redkih primerih, kadar je treba stroške določiti posebej (tudi kadar je bila ta določitev nenamerno izpuščena, pri čemer mora zadevna stranka v takšnem primeru ravnati tudi v skladu z zahtevami, ki se uporabljajo), se uporabljata naslednji postopkovni zahtevi:
admissibility 
dopustnost,
evidence. 
dokazi.
5.6.3.1 Admissibility 
Dopustnost
The request for fixation of costs is only admissible once the decision in respect of which the fixing of costs is required has become final and up to 2 months after that date. 
Zahteva za določitev stroškov je dopustna šele, ko je odločba, v zvezi s katero se zahteva določitev stroškov, postala dokončna in najpozneje dva meseca po tem datumu.
5.6.3.2 Evidence 
Dokazi
For awarding the opposition fee, no evidence is needed. 
Za odobritev pristojbine za ugovor dokazi niso potrebni.
For awarding the representation costs at the standard rate, an assurance by the representative that the costs have been incurred is sufficient. 
Za odobritev stroškov zastopanja po pavšalni stopnji zadostuje zagotovilo zastopnika, da so nastali stroški.
A fortiori, if a bill is presented, it suffices that it shows at least the reimbursable amount; it does not matter whether or not it is addressed to the party to the proceedings, as submitting a bill equals an assurance. 
Če je predložen obračun stroškov, zadostuje že, da je v njem naveden vsaj znesek za povračilo; ni pomembno, ali je naslovljen na stranko v postopku ali ne, saj je predložitev obračuna stroškov enakovredna zagotovilu.