natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Copying the image from the database and including it electronically or otherwise in the notice of opposition form is not sufficient. 
Ne zadostuje, če se slika kopira iz podatkovne zbirke in elektronsko ali kako drugače vključi v obrazec za ugovor.
When English is the language of the proceedings, and where the national office also provides an English version of the trade mark extract no translation would in principle, be necessary. 
Če je jezik postopka angleščina in nacionalni urad predloži tudi angleško različico izpiska v zvezi z blagovno znamko, prevod načeloma ni potreben.
However, as regards the list of goods and/or services, where the extract itself only gives the class headings along with a warning indicating that this reference to the class heading does not necessarily reflect the goods and/or services protected under the trade mark, the opponent must always file the original list in the original language (from an official source) and, where the list does not consist of a class heading, an accurate translation into English. 
Če pa so, kar zadeva seznam blaga in/ali storitev, na izpisku navedeni samo naslovi razredov skupaj z opozorilom, da to sklicevanje na naslov razreda ne izraža nujno blaga in/ali storitev, zaščitenih z blagovno znamko, mora v takšnem primeru vložnik ugovora vedno predložiti izvirni seznam v izvirnem jeziku (iz uradnega vira) in, kadar seznam ne zajema naslova razreda, natančen prevod v angleščino.
Such translations are also required if the opponent relies on evidence accessible online from a source recognised by the Office if such evidence or part of it is not in the language of the proceedings. 
Takšni prevodi se zahtevajo tudi, če se vložnik ugovora opira na dokaze, dostopne prek spletnega vira, ki ga priznava Urad, če takšni dokazi ali del dokazov ni v jeziku postopka.
4.2.3.3 Extracts from official bulletins of the relevant national trade mark offices and WIPO 
Izpiski iz uradnih biltenov zadevnih nacionalnih uradov za znamke in organizacije WIPO
In all Member States the trade mark application and/or registration is published in an official bulletin. 
Prijava za znamko in/ali registracija znamke je v vseh državah članicah objavljena v uradnem biltenu.
Copies of the publication are accepted as long as the document (or the accompanying observations of the opponent) indicates the origin of the publication. 
Kopije objave so sprejemljive, če je na dokumentu (ali priloženih pripombah vložnika ugovora) naveden vir objave.
If this indication is missing, the evidence is insufficient to prove the validity of the mark. 
Če ta navedba manjka, takšni dokumenti ne zadostujejo za dokaz veljavnosti znamke.
Furthermore, a copy of the publication of the application is not sufficient to prove that the trade mark has been registered. 
Poleg tega kopija objave prijave ne zadostuje za dokaz, da je bila blagovna znamka registrirana.
In other words, it cannot serve to prove the existence of a trade mark registration. 
Z drugimi besedami, te kopije ni mogoče uporabiti za dokaz obstoja registracije blagovne znamke.
The Office accepts the first WIPO publication of the international registration as sufficient evidence of registration although, once registered, it can still be refused by national offices during the following 12 to 18 months. 
Urad prvo objavo mednarodne registracije pri organizaciji WIPO priznava kot zadostni dokaz o registraciji, čeprav jo lahko nacionalni organi po registraciji v naslednjih 12 do 18 mesecih še vedno zavrnejo.
Only if the applicant contests the protection of the mark in question in a given territory or for certain goods and services will the opponent have to submit evidence that the mark was not refused. 
Vložnik ugovora bo moral dokaze, da znamka ni bila zavrnjena, predložiti le, če prijavitelj izpodbija varstvo zadevne znamke na ustreznem ozemlju ali za nekatero blago in storitve.
4.2.3.4 Duration of a trade mark registration 
Veljavnost registracije blagovne znamke
In general, the registration of a mark lasts 10 years. 
Na splošno registracija znamke velja deset let.
After this period has elapsed, the registration of the mark can be renewed every 10 years. 
Po izteku tega obdobja se lahko registracija znamke podaljša vsakih deset let.
In most of the countries, the starting point of the 10 years is the filing date, but there are exceptions. 
V večini držav začne desetletno obdobje teči z datumom vložitve, vendar so možne tudi izjeme.
According to Article 7(2)(a)(ii) EUTMDR, if the trade mark is registered, the opponent must submit evidence of registration. 
V skladu s členom 7(2)(a)(ii) Delegirane uredbe mora vložnik ugovora, če je blagovna znamka registrirana, predložiti dokaz o registraciji.
If the opponent has submitted a registration certificate but the registration is due to expire before the expiry of the time limit for substantiation, it must file a renewal certificate or equivalent document in order to prove that the term of protection of the trade mark extends beyond this time limit or any extension given to substantiate its opposition. 
Če je vložnik ugovora predložil potrdilo o registraciji, vendar bo registracija potekla pred iztekom roka za utemeljitev, mora predložiti potrdilo o podaljšanju ali enakovreden dokument, da bi dokazal, da obdobje varstva blagovne znamke sega čez ta rok ali podaljšanje roka, ki mu je odobren za utemeljitev ugovora.
Such information must be accessible from a source recognised by the Office if the opponent relied on it. 
Takšne informacije morajo biti dostopne iz vira, ki ga Urad priznava, če se je vložnik ugovora skliceval nanj.
What counts is the date on which the registration would expire, and not the possibility of renewing the mark within the 6-month grace period under the Paris Convention. 
Pomemben je datum poteka registracije, ne pa možnost podaljšanja znamke v šestmesečnem odložnem roku (grace period) v smislu Pariške konvencije.
When an earlier right on which the opposition is based reaches the end of protection after expiry of the time limit set by the Office to substantiate the opposition, the opposition is not automatically rejected in the absence of further communications or proof from the opponent. 
Kadar se varstvo prejšnje pravice, na kateri temelji ugovor, preneha po izteku roka, ki ga določi Urad za utemeljitev ugovora, se ugovor ne zavrne samodejno, če vložnik ugovora ne predloži nadaljnjih sporočil ali dokazov.
Rather a communication is issued to the opponent in which it is invited to submit evidence of renewal, which is then communicated to the applicant (05/05/2015, T715/13, Castello (fig.) / Castelló y Juan S.A. (fig.) et al., EU:T:2015:256, § 68 et seq.). 
Namesto tega se mu pošlje sporočilo, v katerem se ga pozove k predložitvi dokazov o podaljšanju, ki se nato predložijo prosilcu (05/05/2015, T715/13, Castello (fig.) / Castelló y Juan S.A. (fig.) et al., EU:T:2015:256, § 68 et seq.).
Only if the renewal certificate contains all the necessary data that determines the scope of the protection of the earlier mark, can the renewal certificate be submitted without a copy of the registration certificate. 
Samo če potrdilo o podaljšanju vsebuje vse potrebne podatke za določitev obsega varstva prejšnje znamke, je mogoče potrdilo o podaljšanju predložiti brez kopije potrdila o registraciji.
For example, German renewals and sometimes Spanish renewals do not contain all the necessary data and therefore are, on their own, not sufficient to substantiate an earlier mark. 
Na primer, nemška in včasih tudi španska podaljšanja ne vsebujejo vseh potrebnih podatkov in zato ne zadostujejo za utemeljitev prejšnje znamke.
If there is no proper evidence of renewal, the earlier registration is not substantiated and will not be taken into account. 
Če se ustrezen dokaz o podaljšanju ne predloži, prejšnja registracija ne bo utemeljena in se ne bo upoštevala.
4.2.3.5 Entitlement to file the opposition 
Upravičenost do vložitve ugovora
Article 2(2)(h)(iii) and Article 7(2) EUTMDR 
Člen 2(2)(h)(iii) in člen 7(2) Delegirane uredbe
Depending on the ground invoked the following are entitled to file an opposition: 
Glede na navedeni razlog imajo pravico do vložitve ugovora:
1. proprietors and authorised licensees for Article 8(1) and (5) EUTMR; 
imetniki in pooblaščeni pridobitelji licence iz člena 8(1) in (5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU;
2. proprietors (only) for trade marks referred to in Article 8(3) EUTMR; 
(samo) imetniki za blagovne znamke iz člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU;
3. proprietors of earlier rights referred to in Article 8(4) EUTMR and persons authorised under the relevant applicable national law; 
imetniki prejšnjih pravic iz člena 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in osebe, pooblaščene na podlagi zadevnega nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja;
4. any person authorised under the relevant European Union legislation or national law to exercise the rights referred to in Article 8(6) EUTMR. 
katera koli oseba, ki je na podlagi zadevne zakonodaje Evropske unije ali nacionalnega prava pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic iz člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
If the opponent is a corporation, the name of the corporation must be carefully compared with the name of the corporation that owns the prior trade mark. 
Če je vložnik ugovora pravna oseba, je treba ime pravne osebe skrbno primerjati z imenom pravne osebe, ki je imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke.
For instance with British companies, John Smith Ltd, John Smith PLC and John Smith (UK) Ltd are different legal entities. 
Na primer, pri britanskih podjetjih so John Smith Ltd, John Smith PLC in John Smith (UK) Ltd različne pravne osebe.
If the opposition is filed with B as opponent and a copy of the registration certificate shows A as owner of the earlier mark, the opposition will be rejected as not substantiated, unless the opponent has submitted evidence of the transfer and, if already available, the registration of the transfer in the relevant register or the opponent has shown that A and B are the same legal entity, which has merely changed its name. 
Če ugovor vloži oseba B kot vložnik ugovora in je na kopiji potrdila o registraciji kot imetnik prejšnje znamke navedena oseba A, bo ugovor zavrnjen kot neutemeljen, razen če je vložnik ugovora predložil dokaze o prenosu in, če je že na voljo, dokaz o vpisu prenosa v ustrezen register ali dokazal, da sta osebi A in B ista pravna oseba, ki je le spremenila ime.
If the opponent is a licensee of the trade mark proprietor, the extract of the registration will normally show when a licence has been registered. 
Če je vložnik ugovora pridobitelj licence imetnika blagovne znamke, bo na izpisku iz vpisa v register običajno navedeno, kdaj je bila licenca registrirana.
However, some Member States do not record licences in their registers. 
Nekatere države članice licenc ne vpisujejo v svoje registre.
In all cases, it is up to the opponent to demonstrate that it is a licensee and also that it is authorised by the trade mark owner to file an opposition. 
V vseh primerih je vložnik ugovora tisti, ki mora dokazati, da je pridobitelj licence in da ga je za vložitev ugovora pooblastil imetnik blagovne znamke.
There are no restrictions on what evidence can be submitted to support such an authorisation: for example, any express authorisation on behalf of the trade mark proprietor, such as the licence contract, is deemed sufficient, so long as it contains indications concerning the authorisation or entitlement to file the opposition. 
Omejitev glede dokazov, ki jih je mogoče predložiti za dokaz obstoja takšnega pooblastila, ni: na primer, katero koli izrecno pooblastilo v imenu imetnika blagovne znamke, kot je licenčna pogodba, se šteje za zadostno, če vsebuje navedbe v zvezi s pooblastilom ali upravičenostjo do vložitve ugovora.
The same applies to any person authorised under the relevant applicable European Union legislation or national law for the grounds of Article 8(4) and (6) EUTMR. 
Enako velja za vse osebe, pooblaščene na podlagi zadevne zakonodaje Evropske unije ali nacionalnega prava, ki se uporabljata, v zvezi s členom 8(4) in (6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The opponent must prove its entitlement to file the opposition under the applicable European Union legislation or national law. 
Vložnik ugovora mora dokazati svojo upravičenost do vložitve ugovora na podlagi zakonodaje Evropske unije ali nacionalnega prava, ki se uporabljata.
According to Articles 25, 26 and 29 EUTMR, the Office registers and publishes licence agreements in respect of European Union trade marks. 
Urad v skladu s členi 25, 26 in 29 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v register vpiše licenčne pogodbe v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami EU in jih objavi.
If the earlier mark basis of an opposition subject to a licence agreement is an EUTM, the opponent does not have to submit any evidence of the licence agreement as long as the licence has been registered and published at the Office in accordance with Article 25 EUTMR. 
Če ugovor temelji na prejšnji znamki, ki je predmet licenčne pogodbe in je blagovna znamka EU, vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti nobenega dokaza o licenčni pogodbi, če je bila licenca vpisana v register in objavljena pri Uradu v skladu s členom 25 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
On the other hand, the opponent will still have to submit evidence that proves that this licence agreement entitles it to act in defence of the mark even where the licence is registered and published at the Office, if this evidence was not attached to the original request submitted in accordance with Article 25(5) EUTMR. 
Po drugi strani bo moral vložnik ugovora še vedno predložiti dokaze, če ti niso bili priloženi prvotni zahtevi, predloženi v skladu s členom 25(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, da ima na podlagi te licenčne pogodbe pravico ukrepati v obrambo znamke tudi, če je licenca vpisana v register in objavljena pri Uradu.
For more information on licences, see the Guidelines, Part E, Register Operations, Section 3, EUTMs and RCDS as Objects of Property, Chapter 2, Licences, Rights in Rem, Levies of Execution, Insolvency Proceedings or Similar Proceedings. 
Za več informacij o licencah glej Smernice, del E: Registri, razdelek 3: Blagovne znamke EU in registrirani modeli Skupnosti kot predmeti premoženja, poglavje 2: Licence, stvarne pravice, izvršbe, postopki v primeru insolventnosti ali podobni postopki.
It is not sufficient to prove the registration of the licence agreement - the opponent's entitlement to defend the EUTM must also be submitted in writing. 
Dokaz o vpisu licenčne pogodbe v register ne zadostuje, saj je treba predložiti tudi pisno pooblastilo za vložnika ugovora, da brani blagovno znamko EU.
4.2.3.6 Verification of evidence 
Preverjanje dokazov
The Office verifies that the claims submitted by the opponent within the 3month opposition period are reflected in the evidence submitted or in the evidence accessible online from a source recognised by the Office if the opponent relied on that. 
Urad preveri, ali so zahteve, ki jih je vložnik ugovora vložil v trimesečnem roku za ugovor, razvidne iz predloženih dokazov ali dokazov, ki so na voljo na spletu iz vira, ki ga Urad priznava, če se je vložnik ugovora nanj skliceval.
The following details should be checked: 
Preveriti je treba naslednje podrobnosti:
the issuing authority; 
organ, ki je izdal potrdilo,
the filing [210] and/or registration numbers [111] (in certain countries these are, or were, different); 
številko vložitve (210) in/ali registracije (111) (v nekaterih državah sta ali sta bili drugačni),
a representation of the sign as filed or registered [531, 540, 541, 546, 554, 556, 557, 571, 591] and as claimed in the notice of opposition; 
prikaz znaka, kot je prijavljen ali registriran (531, 541, 546, 554, 556, 557, 571, 591) in kot se zahteva v ugovoru.
Where the earlier mark has been identified as being in colour during the 3-month opposition period, there are two acceptable scenarios. 
Če se v trimesečnem roku za ugovor opredeli, da je prejšnja znamka barvna, sta sprejemljivi možnosti dve.
An official colour representation of the mark such as a registration certificate, renewal certificate, official extract, etc. is submitted or available online that contains a reproduction of the mark in colour. 
Predloži se uradni barvni prikaz znamke, ki vsebuje reprodukcijo znamke v barvah, na primer potrdilo o registraciji, potrdilo o podaljšanju, uradni izpisek itd., pri čemer je ta prikaz lahko na voljo tudi na spletu.
An official document is presented with the representation of the mark in black and white, together with a colour claim and a colour indication, both of which are translated into the language of the proceedings. 
Predloži se uradni dokument s črno-belim prikazom znamke, in sicer skupaj z zahtevo za barvo in navedbo barve, pri čemer sta oba prevedena v jezik postopka.
Where the national trade mark office does not provide a detailed colour claim identifying the colours, and instead says ‘Colours claimed' (or similar wording), this is acceptable as long as this entry is translated into the language of the proceedings. 
Če nacionalni urad za blagovne znamke ne zagotovi podrobne zahteve za barve, v kateri so opredeljene barve, ampak namesto tega navede, da so barve zahtevane (ali podobno besedilo), je to sprejemljivo, če je ta vnos preveden v jezik postopka.
Where the national office (e.g. the Portuguese Trade Mark Office) does not provide any indication of a colour claim in its certificate or official extract and the opponent does not rely on online evidence, further official documents must be submitted to prove this claim (e.g. a copy of the publication of the mark in the bulletin). 
Če nacionalni urad (npr. portugalski urad za blagovne znamke) v svojem potrdilu ali uradnem izpisku ne navede nobene zahteve glede barve in se vložnik ugovora ne sklicuje na spletne dokaze, je treba za dokaz te zahteve predložiti dodatne uradne dokumente (npr. kopijo objave znamke v biltenu).
However, the latter scenario is only acceptable if the opponent has also submitted a colour representation of the mark from an unofficial origin (separate sheet of paper, within the observations, attached to the notice of opposition, etc.). 
Vendar je ta druga možnost sprejemljiva le, če je vložnik ugovora predložil tudi barvni prikaz znamke iz neuradnega vira (ločen list papirja, v pripombah, prilogi k ugovoru itd.).
Therefore, if the opponent has identified during the 3-month opposition period that its figurative mark is in colour and has only submitted a black and white representation to the Office with no further evidence of a colour claim, the opposition based on that earlier right will be rejected as not substantiated. 
Če je vložnik ugovora v trimesečnem roku za ugovor opredelil, da je njegova figurativna znamka barvna, vendar je Uradu poslal samo črno-beli prikaz brez nadaljnjih dokazov o zahtevani barvi, bo zato ugovor, ki temelji na navedeni prejšnji pravici, zavrnjen kot neutemeljen.
Likewise, if the opponent has provided no indication during the opposition period that the earlier mark is in colour (representation in colour, or colour claim), and has only submitted a colour representation to the Office in order to substantiate its opposition, the opposition based on that earlier right will be rejected as not substantiated. 
Podobno, če vložnik ugovora v roku za ugovor ni navedel, da je prejšnja znamka barvna (barvni prikaz ali zahteva glede barve), in je Uradu za utemeljitev svojega ugovora predložil le barvni prikaz, bo ugovor, ki temelji na tej prejšnji pravici, zavrnjen kot neutemeljen;
the goods and services covered [511]; 
zajeto blago in storitve (511),
the expiry date of the registration (if given); 
datum poteka registracije (če je naveden),
the owner [731, 732]; 
imetnika (731, 732),
other entries in the register affecting the legal or procedural status or the scope of protection of the mark (e.g. disclaimers [526], restrictions, renewals, transfers, pending actions, the fact that the mark was registered due to acquired distinctiveness through use, etc.). 
druge vnose v register, ki vplivajo na pravni ali procesni status ali obseg varstva znamke (npr. odklonitve (526), omejitve, podaljšanja, prenosi, ukrepi v teku, dejstvo, da je bila znamka registrirana zaradi razlikovalnega učinka, pridobljenega z uporabo, itd.).
The number in square brackets is the international code number used to identify the information in many, but not all, pieces of evidence, such as extracts from official databases or registration certificates. 
Številka v oglatih oklepajih je številka mednarodne kode, ki se uporablja za označevanje informacij na številnih, vendar ne vseh dokazov, kot so izpiski iz uradnih podatkovnih zbirk ali potrdila o registraciji.
The opponent is not obliged to submit an explanation of the codes, either for the INID or for the national codes. 
Vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti pojasnila niti za kode INID niti za nacionalne kode.
4.2.4 Substantiation of well-known marks, claims of reputation, trade marks filed by an agent, earlier signs used in the course of trade, designations of origin or geographical indications 
Utemeljitev znanih znamk, znamk z ugledom, blagovnih znamk, ki jih vloži posrednik, prejšnjih znakov, ki se uporabljajo v gospodarskem prometu, označb porekla ali geografskih označb
4.2.4.1 Well-known marks 
Znane znamke
Article 7(2)(b) EUTMDR 
Člen 7(2)(b) Delegirane uredbe
An earlier well-known mark is a trade mark that is well known in a Member State, in the sense in which the words ‘well known' are used in Article 6bis of the Paris Convention. 
Prejšnja znana znamka je blagovna znamka, ki je v državi članici znana v smislu izraza znan iz člena 6bis Pariške konvencije.
Such a mark may be non-registered, but it may also be registered. 
Takšna znamka je lahko neregistrirana ali registrirana.
The opponent needs to demonstrate that it is the owner of an earlier trade mark that has become well known, in the relevant territory, for the goods and services on which the opposition is based. 
Vložnik ugovora mora dokazati, da je imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke, ki je na zadevnem ozemlju postala znana za blago in storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor.
In order to substantiate its mark it will have to submit evidence of the mark being well known. 
Za utemeljitev svoje znamke bo moral predložiti dokaze o tem, da je znamka znana.
If the opponent invokes a registered trade mark and claims the same mark in the same country as a well-known mark, this will in general be taken as an additional claim that its registered mark has acquired a high degree of distinctiveness by use. 
Če se vložnik ugovora sklicuje na registrirano blagovno znamko, ki jo v isti državi uveljavlja kot znano znamko, se bo to običajno razlagalo kot dodatna trditev, da je njegova registrirana znamka z uporabo pridobila visoko stopnjo razlikovalnega učinka.
It is very common for opponents to confuse ‘well-known' marks with ‘marks with a reputation' under Article 8(5) EUTMR. 
Vložniki ugovorov zelo pogosto zamenjujejo znane znamke z znamkami z ugledom v smislu člena 8(5) uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Depending on the ground of opposition that is indicated, the case will have to be considered under Article 8(2)(c) and/or Article 8(5) EUTMR. 
Glede na navedeni razlog za ugovor bo treba zadevo obravnavati na podlagi člena 8(2)(c) in/ali člena 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
See also the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 5, Trade Marks with Reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR). 
Glej tudi Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 5: Blagovne znamke z ugledom (člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
4.2.4.2 Marks with reputation 
Znamke z ugledom
Article 7(2)(f) EUTMDR 
Člen 7(2)(f) Delegirane uredbe
An opposition under Article 8(5) EUTMR is based on an earlier trade mark that has a reputation. 
Ugovor na podlagi člena 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU temelji na prejšnji blagovni znamki, ki uživa ugled.
See also the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 5, Trade Marks with Reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR). 
Glej tudi Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 5: Blagovne znamke z ugledom (člen 8(5) uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The earlier trade mark in these cases is a registered trade mark. 
V teh primerih je prejšnja blagovna znamka registrirana blagovna znamka.