natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The relevant dates for establishing the priority of a trade mark and of a TTW are the date of application of the EUTM (or the so-called Paris Convention priority, if claimed) and the date of application for protection of a TTW to the Commission, respectively. 
Upoštevna datuma za opredelitev prednostne pravice znamke in tradicionalnega izraza za vino sta datum prijave blagovne znamke EU (ali tako imenovana prednostna pravica po Pariški konvenciji, če je vložena zahteva za njeno priznanje) oziroma datum vloge za zaščito tradicionalnega izraza za vino, predložene Komisiji.
Where there is no relevant date information in the E-Bacchus extract, this means that the TTW in question was already in existence on 01/08/2009, the date on which the register was set up. 
Če v izpisu iz podatkovne zbirke E-Bacchus ni informacij o upoštevnem datumu, to pomeni, da je zadevni tradicionalni izraz za vino že obstajal 1. avgusta 2009, tj. na dan vzpostavitve registra.
For any TTW added subsequently, the E-Bacchus extract includes a reference to the publication in the Official Journal, which gives the relevant information. 
Za vse pozneje dodane tradicionalne izraze za vina je v izpisu iz podatkovne zbirke E-Bacchus sklicevanje na objavo v Uradnem listu, ki zagotavlja upoštevne informacije.
By analogy with the current practice for PGIs/PDOs, and in view of the fact that the vast majority of applications for TTWs usually mature into a registration, an objection will be raised when the TTW was applied for before the filing date (or the priority date, if applicable) of the EUTM application but had not yet been registered at the time of examination of the EUTM application. 
Po analogiji s sedanjo prakso za označbe ZGO/ZOP in ob upoštevanju, da se velika večina vlog za tradicionalne izraze za vina običajno konča z registracijo, bo vložen ugovor, če je bila vloga za tradicionalni izraz za vino predložena pred datumom vložitve (ali datumom prednostne pravice, če se uporablja) prijave blagovne znamke EU, vendar v času preizkušanja prijave blagovne znamke EU še ni bila registrirana.
However, if the EUTM applicant indicates that the TTW in question has not yet been registered, the proceedings will be suspended until the outcome of the registration procedure for the TTW. 
Če pa prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU navede, da zadevni tradicionalni izraz za vino še ni bil registriran, se postopek prekine do izida postopka registracije v zvezi s tradicionalnim izrazom za vino.
TTWs do not constitute intellectual or industrial property rights like PDOs or PGIs. 
Tradicionalni izrazi za vina ne izhajajo iz pravic intelektualne ali industrijske lastnine kot označbe ZOP/ZGO.
Nevertheless, some of the protected TTWs are associated with the use of a (particular) PDO/PGI. 
Kljub temu so nekateri zaščiteni tradicionalni izrazi za vina povezani z uporabo (zadevne) ZOP/ZGO.
For instance, the TTW ‘Cannellino' is an exclusive term related to a type of ‘Frascati' wine and to its production. 
Na primer, tradicionalni izraz za vino „Cannellino“ je edinstven izraz, povezan z vrsto vina „Frascati“ in njegovo proizvodnjo.
Frascati is a PDO. 
Frascati je ZOP.
The scope of protection of protected TTWs is narrower than that of PDOs/PGIs. 
Obseg varstva zaščitenih tradicionalnih izrazov za vina je manjši kot za označbe ZOP/ZGO.
3. any other practice likely to mislead the consumer, in particular to give the impression that the wine qualifies for the protected traditional term. 
vsemi drugimi praksami, ki utegnejo potrošnika zavesti, zlasti z ustvarjanjem vtisa, da vino izpolnjuje pogoje za zaščiten tradicionalni izraz.
The Office does not automatically object to trade marks that include a term that is also a TTW. 
Urad ne vloži samodejno ugovora zoper blagovne znamke, ki vključujejo izraz, ki je tudi tradicionalni izraz za vino.
It raises an objection only in the event of misuse or false/misleading use of the TTW. 
Ugovor vloži samo v primeru zlorabe ali napačne/zavajajoče uporabe tradicionalnega izraza za vino.
The list of protected TTWs includes terms that are fairly common or that have various meanings not necessarily related to wines (such as ‘NOBLE', ‘CLASICO' or ‘RESERVA'). 
Seznam zaščitenih tradicionalnih izrazov za vina vključuje izraze, ki so precej pogosti ali imajo različne pomene, ki niso nujno povezani z vini (kot so „NOBLE“, „CLASICO“ ali „RESERVA“).
Depending on the context in which these terms are used, they may or may not be associated with wine quality. 
Glede na okoliščine, v katerih se uporabljajo ti izrazi, so lahko povezani s kakovostjo vina ali pa tudi ne.
4 Relevant Goods 
Člen 113(2) Uredbe (EU) št.
The Office interprets this as meaning that, unlike PGIs/PDOs, objections based on conflicts with TTWs cannot be raised for comparable goods. 
Urad to razlaga tako, da v nasprotju z označbami ZGO/ZOP ugovorov zaradi sovpadanja s tradicionalnimi izrazi za vina ni mogoče vložiti za primerljive proizvode.
Such products are wine, liqueur wine, sparkling wine, quality sparkling wine, quality aromatic sparkling wine, semi-sparkling wine, aerated semi-sparkling wine, partially fermented grape must, wine from raisined grapes, wine of overripe grapes. 
Ti proizvodi so vino, likersko vino, peneče vino, kakovostno peneče vino, kakovostno aromatično peneče vino, biser vino, gazirano biser vino, delno prevreti grozdni mošt, vino iz sušenega grozdja, vino iz prezrelega grozdja.
For instance, in the event of an EUTM application containing the TTW ‘Fondillón', for wine in Class 33, the objection should be raised not only against wine of overripe grapes that is protected by the TTW, but also against wine as such (e.g. wine complying with the definition/conditions of use of the traditional term for wines ‘Fondillón'). 
Na primer, v primeru prijave blagovne znamke EU za vino iz razreda 33, ki vsebuje tradicionalni izraz za vino, je treba ugovor vložiti ne samo zoper vino iz prezrelega grozdja, ki je zaščiteno s tradicionalnim izrazom za vino, ampak tudi zoper vino na splošno (npr. vino, ki je v skladu z opredelitvijo/pogoji uporabe tradicionalnega izraza za vina „Fondillón“).
4.1 Restrictions of the list of goods 
Omejitve seznama blaga
Objections raised due to conflicts with PDOs/PGIs may be waived if the relevant goods are restricted so as to comply with the specifications of the PDO/PGI in question. 
Ugovore, vložene zaradi sovpadanja z označbami ZOP/ZGO, je mogoče razveljaviti, če je upoštevno blago omejeno, da bi bilo v skladu s specifikacijami zadevne ZOP/ZGO.
For TTWs, there are no such specifications but their registration in the E-Bacchus database includes a ‘summary of definition/conditions of use'. 
Za tradicionalne izraze za vino ni takih specifikacij, vendar njihova registracija v podatkovni zbirki E-Bacchus vključuje povzetek opredelitve ali pogojev uporabe.
Therefore, objections should be waived if the relevant goods are restricted so as to comply with the definition/conditions of use of the TTW in question. 
Zato se ugovori razveljavijo, če je upoštevno blago omejeno, da bi bilo v skladu z opredelitvijo/pogoji uporabe zadevnega tradicionalnega izraza za vino.
The proper wording is ‘[name of the product] complying with the definition/conditions of use of the [TTW ‘X']'. 
Ustrezno besedilo je „[ime proizvoda] v skladu z opredelitvijo/pogoji uporabe [tradicionalnega izraza za vino ‚X﻿ “.
Restrictions such as ‘[name of the product] with the [TTW ‘X']' are not acceptable. 
Omejitve, kot je „[ime proizvoda] s [tradicionalnim izrazom za vino ‚X﻿ “, niso sprejemljive.
5 International Agreements 
Mednarodni sporazumi
By analogy with PDOs/PGIs, where international agreements to which the EU is party can serve as a basis for raising an objection against a trade mark application, TTWs that may be protected under international agreements to which the EU is a party should be taken into account when assessing conflicts between a TTW and an EUTM application. 
Po analogiji z označbami ZOP/ZGO, pri katerih so lahko mednarodni sporazumi, katerih pogodbenica je EU, podlaga za vložitev ugovora zoper prijavo blagovne znamke, je treba tradicionalne izraze za vina, ki so lahko zaščiteni na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov, katerih pogodbenica je EU, upoštevati pri presoji sovpadanja tradicionalnega izraza za vino in prijave blagovne znamke EU.
6 Relationship with other EUTMR Provisions 
Povezava z drugimi določbami Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
When the mark can be objected to under Article 7(1)(k) EUTMR, further examination may still be necessary under the remaining possible grounds for refusal, such as Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR. 
Kadar se zoper znamko lahko vloži ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(k) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, je morda še vedno potrebno nadaljnje preizkušanje glede preostalih možnih razlogov za zavrnitev, kot je člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
In other words, an EUTM application may be in conflict with both a PDO/PGI in the wine sector and a TTW. 
Z drugimi besedami, prijava blagovne znamke EU lahko sovpada z ZOP/ZGO v vinskem sektorju in tradicionalnim izrazom za vino.
Case No Comment 
Št. zadeve Pripomba
The relevant public will link the term ‘château' in the sign with the traditional term ‘château'. 
Upoštevna javnost bo izraz „château“ v znaku povezala s tradicionalnim izrazom „château“.
The TM is therefore objectionable. 
Zato je zoper blagovno znamko mogoče vložiti ugovor.
EUTM application No 15 102 015 The addition of the term ‘RESERVA' within the expression ‘RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA' does not misuse or give misleading/false information with regard to the TTW ‘reserva'. 
15 102 015 Dodan izraz „RESERVA“ v izrazu „RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA“ ne pomeni zlorabe ali dajanja zavajajočih/napačnih informacij v zvezi s tradicionalnim izrazom za vino „reserva“.
The term ‘reserva' in the TM should not be assessed out of context. 
Pri presoji izraza „reserva“ v blagovni znamki je treba upoštevati okoliščine.
‘Reserva' is not only a TTW but also has, in the present case, another meaning, which has no obvious link with the TTW: in the EUTM application, combined with the word ‘biosfera', ‘reserva' clearly refers to a ‘natural space'. 
„Reserva“ ni samo tradicionalni izraz za vino, ampak ima v tem primeru tudi drug pomen, ki ni očitno povezan s tradicionalnim izrazom za vino: v prijavi blagovne znamke EU se izraz „reserva“ v kombinaciji z besedo „biosfera“ jasno nanaša na „naravno okolje“.
Note also that the sign does not refer expressly to a wine. 
Upoštevati je treba tudi, da se znak ne nanaša izrecno na vino.
In light of the above, the expression ‘RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA', read as a whole, constitutes a logical and conceptual unit, in which ‘RESERVA' is qualified by the other terms: ‘DE LA BIOSFERA'. 
Glede na navedeno izraz „RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA“ kot celota pomeni logično in konceptualno enoto, v kateri izraz RESERVA“ opredeljujejo drugi izrazi: „DE LA BIOSFERA“.
There is no direct link being made with the TTW ‘RESERVA' as clearly the term will not be identified as providing information on the quality of wine. 
S tradicionalnim izrazom za vino „RESERVA“ ni neposredne povezave, saj se izraz nedvomno ne bo zaznal kot informacija o kakovosti vina.
Moreover, the structure of the sign confirms that ‘reserva' is not used in isolation or in a different typeface or size. 
Poleg tega zgradba znaka potrjuje, da se izraz „reserva“ ne uporablja ločeno ali v drugi pisavi ali velikosti.
The TM is acceptable. 
Blagovna znamka je sprejemljiva.
‘Noble' is not only a TTW but also has, in the present case, another meaning, which has no obvious link with the TTW. 
„Noble ni samo tradicionalni izraz za vino, ampak ima v tem primeru tudi drug pomen, ki ni očitno povezan s tradicionalnim izrazom za vino.
In this particular case, the expression ‘NOBLE DRAGON' constitutes a logical and conceptual unit, in which ‘NOBLE' directly qualifies the term ‘DRAGON' and therefore does not provide information on the quality of the wine, for example that it is ‘noble' wine. 
V tem primeru izraz „NOBLE DRAGON“ pomeni logično in konceptualno enoto, v kateri izraz „NOBLE“ neposredno opredeljuje izraz „DRAGON“ in zato ne zagotavlja informacij o kakovosti vina, na primer, da je plemenito vino.
The structure of the sign confirms that ‘noble' is not used in isolation or in a different typeface or size. 
Zgradba znaka potrjuje, da se izraz „noble“ ne uporablja ločeno ali v drugi pisavi ali velikosti.
This conclusion is valid for average consumers in the EU: either they will understand the expression ‘NOBLE DRAGON' as a conceptual unit or, even if they do not attribute any meaning to the sign as a whole, given the structure of the sign, in particular the arrangement of the words and the size and typeface in which they are reproduced, the term ‘NOBLE' will not evoke in their minds anything particular about the wine. 
Ta ugotovitev velja za povprečne potrošnike v EU: izraz „NOBLE DRAGON“ bodo razumeli kot konceptualno enoto ali pa izraza „NOBLE“ glede na zgradbo znaka in zlasti razporeditev besed ter velikost in vrsto pisave, v katerih so prikazane, ne bodo povezali z ničemer v zvezi z vinom, tudi če znaku kot celoti ne bodo pripisali nobenega pomena.
Invented EUTM application AXN Late Harvest ‘Vendange Tardive' is a French TTW. 
Izmišljena prijava blagovne znamke EU AXN Late Harvest „Vendange Tardive“ je francoski tradicionalni izraz za vino.
It is protected only in French. 
Zaščiten je samo v francoščini.
The translation of the TTW into English is not objectionable. 
Prevod tradicionalnega izraza v angleščino ni sporen.
See also the EU Commission's reply to Parliamentary question E0622/2006, where it confirmed that the TTW ‘Vendange Tardive' is protected only in French for certain wines originating in France. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na parlamentarno vprašanje E0622/2006, v katerem je potrdila, da je tradicionalni izraz za vino „Vendange Tardive“ zaščiten samo v francoščini za nekatera vina s poreklom iz Francije.
As traditional expressions are only protected in the language in which they are listed, the expression ‘Late Harvest' is not protected in the EU. 
Ker so tradicionalni izrazi zaščiteni samo v jeziku, v katerem so navedeni, izraz „Late Harvest“ ni zaščiten v EU. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2006-0622&language=SL
(http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2006-0622&language=EN) 
ZOP/ZGO TRADICIONALNI IZRAZI ZA VINO Prijava blagovne znamke EU (izmišljena)
RIOJA (PDO-ES-A0117) RESERVA MARQUÉS DE SAN JUAN RESERVA 2010 RIOJA (invented example) Wines complying with the specifications of the PDO ‘Rioja' and with the definition/conditions of use of the traditional term for wines ‘RESERVA'. 
RIOJA (PDO-ES-A0117) RESERVA MARQUÉS DE SAN JUAN RESERVA 2010 RIOJA (izmišljen primer) Vina v skladu s specifikacijami ZOP „Rioja“ in z opredelitvijo/pogoji uporabe tradicionalnega izraza za vina RESERVA.
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part B Examination Page 8 
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del B, Preizkušanje Stran 9
Absolute Grounds for Refusal -Trade Marks in Conflict with Traditional Specialities Guaranteed 
Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev - Blagovne znamke, ki sovpadajo z zajamčenimi tradicionalnimi posebnostmi
CHAPTER 12 
POGLAVJE 12
TRADE MARKS IN CONFLICT WITH TRADITIONAL SPECIALITIES GUARANTEED (ARTICLE 7(1)(l) EUTMR) 
BLAGOVNE ZNAMKE, KI SOVPADAJO Z ZAJAMČENIMI TRADICIONALNIMI POSEBNOSTMI (ČLEN 7(1)(l) UREDBE O BLAGOVNI ZNAMKI EU)
1 Article 7(1)(l) EUTMR 3 
1 Člen 7(1)(l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU 3
2 General Remarks on EU Regulations 3 
2 Splošne opombe k uredbam EU 3
2.1 Definition of traditional specialities guaranteed under EU Regulations 3 
2.1 Opredelitev zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti v skladu z uredbami EU 3
2.2 Relationship with trade marks 4 
2.2 Razmerje do blagovnih znamk 4
3 Relevant Goods Under EU Regulations 4 
3 Upoštevno blago v skladu z uredbami EU 4
3.1 Relevant point in time 4 
3.1 Upoštevni trenutek 5
5 Relevant Goods 6 
5 Upoštevno blago 6
5.1 Restrictions of the list of goods 6 
5.1 Omejitve seznama blaga 6
6 International Agreements 7 
6 Mednarodni sporazumi 7
7 Relationship with Other EUTMR Provisions 7 
7 Povezava z drugimi določbami Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU 7
1 Article 7(1)(l) EUTMR 
Člen 7(1)(l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 7(1)(l) EUTMR applies to EUTMs that are in conflict with TSGs protected by either EU legislation or international agreements to which the EU is party. 
Člen 7(1)(l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se uporablja za blagovne znamke EU, ki sovpadajo z zajamčenimi tradicionalnimi posebnostmi, zaščitenimi z zakonodajo EU ali mednarodnimi sporazumi, katerih pogodbenica je EU.
Just as in the case of traditional terms for wine (TTWs), it is a ground for refusal of EUTMs that has been introduced for reasons of coherence, in order to offer TSGs a degree of protection equivalent to that given to designations of origin and geographical indications. 
Tako kot v primeru tradicionalnih izrazov za vina je bil razlog za zavrnitev blagovnih znamk EU uveden zaradi skladnosti, da se zajamčenim tradicionalnim posebnostim zagotovi raven zaščite, ki je enaka tisti, ki se priznava za označbe porekla in geografske označbe.
2 General Remarks on EU Regulations 
Splošne opombe k uredbam EU
2.1 Definition of traditional specialities guaranteed under EU Regulations 
Opredelitev zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti v skladu z uredbami EU
results from a mode of production, processing or composition corresponding to traditional practice for that product or foodstuff; or 
katerega način proizvodnje, predelava ali sestava ustreza tradicionalni praksi za zadevni proizvod ali živilo, ali
is produced from raw materials or ingredients that are those traditionally used.' 
ki je proizveden(-o) iz surovin ali sestavin, ki se tradicionalno uporabljajo“.
Hence, TSGs highlight the traditional characteristics of a product either in its production process or composition, for instance, ‘Lambic, Gueuze-Lambic, Gueuze' for Belgian acid beer during production of which spontaneous fermentation occurs, ‘Jamón Serrano' for Spanish ham produced in accordance with a traditional method of salting, drying/maturing and ageing. 
Zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti poudarjajo tradicionalne značilnosti proizvoda v zvezi z njegovim postopkom proizvodnje ali sestavo, na primer, „Lambic, Gueuze-Lambic, Gueuze“ za belgijsko kislo pivo, pri proizvodnji katerega nastane spontana fermentacija, „Jamón Serrano“ za špansko šunko, proizvedeno v skladu s tradicionalno metodo soljenja, sušenja/zorenja in staranja.
Unlike PGIs/PDOs, the TSG quality scheme does not certify that the protected food product has a link to a specific geographical area, for instance, TSG ‘Mozzarella' for Italian fresh pulled-curd cheese and PDO ‘Mozzarella di Bufala Campana' for mozzarella cheese originating from a particular geographical area. 
V nasprotju z označbami ZGO/ZOP shema kakovosti zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti ne potrjuje, da je zaščiteni živilski proizvod povezan z zadevnim geografskim območjem, na primer, ZTP „Mozzarella“ za italijanski sveži vlečeni sir iz skute in ZOP „Mozzarella di Bufala Campana“ za sir mocarela s poreklom z zadevnega geografskega območja.
To qualify as a TSG, a product must, according to Article 18(2) of the Regulation, be of a specific character: ‘2. 
Da bi izpolnjeval pogoje za zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti, mora proizvod v skladu s členom 18(2) navedene uredbe imeti posebne lastnosti: „2.
For a name to be registered as a traditional speciality guaranteed, it shall: 
Da se ime registrira kot zajamčena tradicionalna posebnost:
have been traditionally used to refer to the specific product; or 
se mora ime tradicionalno uporabljati za označevanje specifičnega proizvoda ali
‘specific character' as ‘the characteristic production attributes which distinguish a product clearly from other similar products of the same category'; 
„posebne lastnosti“ kot „tipične proizvodne lastnosti, zaradi katerih se proizvod jasno razlikuje od drugih podobnih proizvodov iste kategorije“;
‘traditional' as ‘proven usage on the domestic market for a period that allows transmission between generations; this period is to be at least 30 years.' 
„tradicionalen“ kot „dokazano uporabo na domačem trgu v obdobju, ki omogoča prenos iz generacije v generacijo; to obdobje je najmanj 30 let“.
2.2 Relationship with trade marks 
Razmerje do blagovnih znamk
Article 24(1) prohibits the use of the TSG in a number of situations but not the registration of a trade mark. 
Člen 24(1) prepoveduje uporabo zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti v številnih okoliščinah, vendar ne registracije blagovnih znamk.
Article 7(1)(l) EUTMR, however, refers to ‘trade marks which are excluded from registration pursuant to Union legislation'. 
Člen 7(1)(l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU pa se nanaša na „blagovne znamke, ki so izključene iz registracije v skladu z zakonodajo Unije“.
The Office considers that a systematic approach should be followed and draws an analogy with Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR: the registration of an EUTM application should be refused or the registration of an EUTM invalidated if there is conflict with a TSG. 
Urad meni, da je treba uporabiti sistematični pristop po analogiji s členom 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU: registracijo prijave blagovne znamke EU je treba zavrniti ali registracijo blagovne znamke EU razveljaviti, če sovpadajo z zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnostjo.
3 Relevant Goods Under EU Regulations 
Upoštevno blago v skladu z uredbami EU
Relevant information about traditional specialities guaranteed can be found in the DOOR database maintained by the Commission, which can be accessed online at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html. 
Upoštevne informacije o zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnostih so na voljo v podatkovni zbirki DOOR, ki jo vodi Komisija in do katere je mogoče dostopati na spletnem mestu http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html?locale=sl.
3.1 Relevant point in time 
Upoštevni trenutek
Article 7(1)(l) EUTMR applies only to TSGs that were applied for before the EUTM application and are registered at the time when the EUTM application was examined. 
Člen 7(1)(l) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se uporablja samo za zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti, ki so se uporabljale pred prijavo blagovne znamke EU in so registrirane v času preizkušanja prijave blagovne znamke EU.
By analogy with the current practice for PGIs/PDOs, and in view of the fact that the vast majority of applications for TSGs usually mature into a registration, an objection will be raised when the TSG was applied for before the filing date (or the priority date, if applicable) of the EUTM application but is not yet registered at the time when the EUTM application was examined. 
Po analogiji s sedanjo prakso za označbe ZGO/ZOP in ob upoštevanju, da se velika večina vlog za zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti običajno konča z registracijo, bo vložen ugovor, če je bila vloga za zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnost predložena pred datumom vložitve (ali datumom prednostne pravice, če se uporablja) prijave blagovne znamke EU, vendar v času preizkušanja prijave blagovne znamke EU še ni registrirana.
However, if the EUTM applicant submits that the TSG in question is not yet registered, the proceedings will be suspended until the outcome of the registration procedure for the TSG. 
Če pa prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU trdi, da zadevna zajamčena tradicionalna posebnost še ni registrirana, se postopek prekine do izida postopka registracije v zvezi z zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnostjo.
TSGs are used to provide information on particular methods of production and recipes. 
Zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti se uporabljajo za zagotavljanje informacij o posebnih metodah proizvodnje in receptih.
Importantly, unlike PDOs and PGIs, there is no link between a TSG and a specific geographical area. 
Pomembno je, da v nasprotju z označbami ZOP in ZGO ni povezave med zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnostjo in zadevnim geografskim območjem.
The scope of protection of protected TSGs is narrower than that of PDOs/PGIs. 
Obseg varstva zaščitenih zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti je manjši kot za označbe ZOP/ZGO.
The exploitation of the reputation of the TSG is not contemplated. 
Izkoriščanje ugleda zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti ni obravnavano.