natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A colour may also be usual (e.g. again, red for fire extinguishers, yellow for postal services in many countries). 
Barva je lahko tudi običajna (npr. rdeča barva za gasilne aparate, rumena za poštne storitve v številnih državah).
A colour may indicate a particular characteristic of the goods, such as a flavour (yellow for lemon flavour, pink for strawberry flavour). 
Barva lahko označuje neko lastnost blaga, kot je okus (rumena za okus limone, rožnata za okus jagode).
See judgment of 03/05/2017, T36/16, GREEN STRIPES ON A PIN (col.), EU:T:2017:295, paras 43 to 47, in which the Court stated that the colour green, perceived as the colour of nature, would lead the relevant public to understand it as referring to the ecological nature of the goods at issue (wind energy converters). 
Glej sodbo z dne 03/05/2017, T36/16, GREEN STRIPES ON A PIN (col.), EU:T:2017:295, točke od 43 do 47, v kateri je Sodišče navedlo, da bi zelena barva, ki se zaznava kot barva narave, upoštevno javnost napeljala k temu, da jo razume kot ekološko naravo zadevnega blaga (pretvorniki vetrne energije).
A colour combination should also be refused if the existence of the colour combination can already be found on the market, in particular if used by different competitors (e.g. the Office proved that the colour combination red and yellow is used by various enterprises on beer and soft drink cans). 
Kombinacijo barv je treba zavrniti tudi, če je takšno barvno kombinacijo že mogoče najti na trgu, zlasti če jo uporabljajo različni konkurenti (na primer, Urad je dokazal, da različna podjetja kombinacijo rdeče in rumene barve uporabljajo na pločevinkah za pivo in brezalkoholne pijače).
In all these cases the trade mark should be objected to but with careful analysis of the goods and services concerned and the situation on the market. 
V vseh teh primerih je treba vložiti ugovor, vendar na podlagi podrobne analize zadevnega blaga in storitev ter razmer na trgu.
The criteria to assess the distinctiveness of colour marks designating services should not be different from those applicable to colour marks designating goods (as reiterated by the General Court in its judgment of 12/11/2010, T404/09, Grau/Rot, EU:T:2010:466). 
Merila za ocenjevanje razlikovalnega učinka barvnih znamk, ki označujejo storitve, ne smejo biti drugačna od meril, ki veljajo za barvne znamke, ki označujejo blago (kot je Splošno sodišče izpostavilo v sodbi z dne 12/11/2010, T404/09, Grau/Rot, EU:T:2010:466).
In this case, the colour combination applied for was considered not to differ for the relevant consumer in a perceptible manner from the colours generally used for the services concerned. 
V tem primeru se je štelo, da se barvna kombinacija, za katero je bila vložena prijava, z vidika upoštevnega potrošnika ne razlikuje dovolj od barv, ki se splošno uporabljajo za zadevne storitve, da bi bilo to mogoče zaznati.
The General Court concluded that the colour combination applied for was very close to the combination ‘white/red' used on the railway crossing gates and traffic signs associated with train traffic and that the sign, as a whole, would be recognised by the relevant public as a functional or decorative element and not as an indication of the commercial origin of the services. 
Splošno sodišče je sklenilo, da je barvna kombinacija, za katero je bila vložena prijava, zelo podobna kombinaciji „bela/rdeča“, ki se uporablja na železniških prehodih in prometnih znakih, povezanih z železniškim prometom, in da bi upoštevna javnost znak na splošno prepoznala kot funkcionalni ali okrasni element, in ne kot označbo trgovskega izvora storitev.
The higher the number of colours is, the less distinctiveness is likely, because of the difficulty of memorising a high number of different colours and their sequence. 
Več ko je barv, manj verjetneje je, da ima barvna kombinacija razlikovalni učinek, ker si je težje zapomniti veliko število različnih barv in njihovo zaporedje.
For the names of colours see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 4, Descriptive Trade Marks (Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR). 
Za imena barv glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavje 4: Opisne blagovne znamke (člen 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
15 Sound Marks 
Zvočne znamke
The definition of sound marks is restricted to only those that consist exclusively of a sound or a combination of sounds (Article 3(3)(g) EUTMIR). 
Opredelitev zvočnih znamk je omejena samo na tiste, ki so sestavljene izključno iz zvoka ali kombinacije zvokov (člen 3(3)(g) Izvedbene uredbe).
Trade marks combining sounds with other elements, namely movement, do not qualify as sound marks, but are considered multimedia marks. 
Znamke, ki so sestavljene iz kombinacije zvoka in drugih elementov, in sicer gibanja, niso zvočne znamke, ampak multimedijske znamke.
The acceptability of a sound mark must, like words or other types of trade marks, depend upon whether the sound is distinctive per se, that is, whether the average consumer will perceive the sound as a memorable one that serves to indicate that the goods or services are exclusively associated with one undertaking. 
Sprejemljivost zvočne znamke mora biti, kot v primeru besed ali drugih vrst blagovnih znamk, odvisna od tega, ali je zvok razlikovalen, tj. ali bo povprečen potrošnik zvok zaznal kot zvok, ki si ga lahko zapomni in proizvode ali storitve povezuje izključno z enim podjetjem.
Consumers are not in the habit of making assumptions about the origin of goods in the absence of any graphic or word element, because generally a sound per se is not commonly used in any field of commercial practice as a means of identification. 
Potrošniki ob neobstoju kakršnih koli grafičnih ali besednih elementov po navadi ne domnevajo o izvoru blaga, ker se običajno zvok ne uporablja na katerem koli področju trgovinske prakse kot sredstvo identifikacije.
The perception of the relevant public is not necessarily the same in the case of a sign consisting of a sound per se as it is in the case of a word or figurative mark consisting of a sign that bears no relation to the appearance of the goods it denotes. 
Zaznavanje upoštevne javnosti ni nujno enako v primeru znaka, ki ga sestavlja zvok, kot v primeru besedne ali figurativne znamke, ki jo sestavlja znak brez povezave z videzom blaga, ki ga označuje.
While the public is accustomed to perceiving word or figurative marks instantly as signs identifying the commercial origin of the goods, the same is not necessarily true where the sign is merely a sound (see, by analogy, judgment of 04/10/2007, C144/06 P, Tabs (3D), EU:C:2007:577, § 36). 
Javnost navadno takoj zazna besedne ali figurativne znamke kot znake, ki opredeljujejo trgovski izvor blaga, to pa ne velja nujno v primeru znaka, ki ga sestavlja samo zvok (po analogiji glej sodbo z dne 04/10/2007, C144/06 P, Tabs (3D), EU:C:2007:577, § 36).
By the same token, only a sound that departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector and thereby fulfils its essential function of indicating origin is not devoid of any distinctive character for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR (see, by analogy, judgment of 24/05/2012, C98/11 P, Hase, EU:C:2012:307, § 42). 
Enako ima samo zvok, ki pomembno odstopa od standarda ali navad v sektorju in torej ustreza poglavitnim nalogam označbe izvora, razlikovalni učinek v smislu člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (po analogiji glej sodbo z dne 24/05/2012, C98/11 P, Hase, EU:C:2012:307, § 42).
The kinds of sound marks that are unlikely to be accepted without evidence of factual distinctiveness include: 
Vrste zvočnih znamk, ki se običajno ne sprejmejo brez dokaza dejanskega razlikovalnega učinka, zajemajo:
very simple pieces of music consisting of only one or two notes (see examples below); 
zelo preproste skladbe, ki jih sestavljata samo ena ali dve noti (glej spodnje primere);
sounds that are too long to be considered as an indication of origin; 
zvoke, ki so predolgi, da bi lahko označevali izvor;
sounds typically linked to specific goods and services (see examples below). 
zvoke, ki so značilno povezani z določenim blagom in storitvami (glej spodnje primere).
Where the sign applied for consists of a non-distinctive sound but includes other distinctive elements, such as words or lyrics, it will be considered as a whole. 
Kadar znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, sestavlja nerazlikovalen zvok, vendar zajema druge razlikovalne elemente, kot so besede ali besedilo, se znak šteje kot celota.
Refused trade marks 
Zavrnjene blagovne znamke
Acceptable trade marks 
Sprejemljive blagovne znamke
16 Motion, Multimedia and Hologram Marks 
Znamke gibanja, multimedijske znamke in holografske znamke
Article 3(3)(h) EUTMIR describes a motion mark as a trade mark consisting of, or extending to, a movement or a change in the position of the elements of the mark. 
Člen 3(3)(h) Izvedbene uredbe opisuje znamko gibanja kot znamko, ki je sestavljena iz gibanja ali spremembe položaja elementov znamke ali ju zajema.
The term ‘extending to' means that these marks cover not only the motion per se but also movements that contain word or figurative elements such as logos or labels. 
Izraz „ju zajema“ pomeni, da te znamke ne zajemajo le gibanja, temveč tudi gibanje, ki vsebuje besedne ali figurativne elemente, kot so logotipi ali etikete.
The proposed definition does not restrict motion marks to those depicting movement. 
Predlagana opredelitev ne omejuje znamk gibanja na znamke, ki prikazujejo gibanje.
A sign may also qualify as a motion mark if it is capable of showing a change in the position of the elements (e.g. a sequence of stills). 
Znak je lahko znamka gibanja tudi, če lahko pokaže spremembo položaja elementov (npr. zaporedje mirujočih slik).
Motion marks do not include sound (see multimedia marks below). 
Znamke gibanja ne vključujejo zvoka (glej multimedijske znamke v nadaljevanju).
The term ‘extending to' means that these marks cover not only the combination of sound and image per se but also combinations that include word or figurative elements. 
Izraz „jo zajema“ pomeni, da te znamke ne zajemajo le kombinacije zvoka in slike, temveč tudi kombinacije, ki vsebujejo besedne ali figurativne elemente.
Article 3(3)(j) EUTMIR defines a hologram mark as a trade mark consisting of elements with holographic characteristics. 
Člen 3(3)(j) Izvedbene uredbe opredeljuje holografsko znamko kot blagovno znamko, ki je sestavljena iz elementov s holografskimi značilnostmi.
In the absence of relevant case-law, the general criteria for the assessment of distinctiveness will apply to these marks. 
Glede na neobstoj ustrezne sodne prakse se za te znamke uporabljajo splošna merila za oceno razlikovalnega učinka.
The mark will be distinctive within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR if the sign can serve to identify the product and/or services for which registration is applied for as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish that product/service from those of other undertakings. 
Znamka ima razlikovalni učinek v smislu člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če znak omogoča, da se ugotovi istovetnost proizvoda in/ali storitev, za katere se zahteva registracija, kot proizvoda in/ali storitev, ki prihajajo iz nekega podjetja, in da se ta proizvod in/ali storitve razlikujejo od proizvodov in/ali storitev drugih podjetij.
This distinctiveness will be assessed by reference, first, to the goods or services for which registration is sought and, second, to the relevant public's perception of that sign. 
Ta razlikovalni učinek se presoja po eni strani glede na proizvode ali storitve, za katere se zahteva registracija, in po drugi strani glede na to, kako ta znak zaznava upoštevna javnost.
EUTM Main function Case No 
Blagovna znamka EU št.
EUTM No 5 904 438 MORE THAN JUST A CARD for Class 36 (bank, credit and debit card services) Customer service statement R 1608/20074 
5 904 438 MORE THAN JUST A CARD za razred 36 (plačilne storitve z bančnimi, kreditnimi, debetnimi in elektronskimi karticami) Izjava o storitvah za stranke R 1608/20074
It is the kind of language an English speaker would use to describe a bank card that is a little out of the ordinary. 
Takšne vrste jezik bi angleški govorec uporabil za opis bančne kartice, ki je nekoliko drugačna od običajnih bančnih kartic.
It conveys the notion that the card has welcome features that are not obvious at first sight. 
Razkriva idejo, da ima kartica dobrodošle lastnosti, ki niso očitne na prvi pogled.
AND KEEP YOU AHEAD for Class 40 Customer service statement (Examiner's decision without BoA case) 
AND KEEP YOU AHEAD za razred 40 Izjava o storitvah za stranke (Odločba preizkuševalca brez primera odbora za pritožbe)
EUTM Main function Case No 
Blagovna znamka EU Glavna funkcija Št. zadeve
Contrary to the appellant's contentions that the word ‘now' constitutes an original element since nobody will believe that by purchasing the goods in question they will literally save the Earth now, the word ‘NOW' is an emotional word commonly used in marketing to urge consumers to consume, to get what they want without waiting; it is a call to action. 
V nasprotju s pritožnikovimi trditvami, da je beseda „NOW“ izviren element, ker nihče ne bo verjel, da bo z nakupom zadevnega blaga dejansko zdaj rešil Zemljo, je to čustvena beseda, ki se pri trženju pogosto uporablja za spodbujanje potrošnikov k potrošnji, ne da bi morali čakati na to, kar si želijo; gre za poziv k dejanju.
EUTM No 4 885 323 DRINK WATER, NOT SUGAR for Classes 32 and 33 Inspirational or motivational statement R 718/20072 
4 885 323 DRINK WATER, NOT SUGAR za razreda 32 in 33 Navdihujoča ali motivacijska izjava R 718/20072
The mark lacks any secondary or covert meaning, has no fanciful elements, and its message to the consumer is plain, direct and unambiguous. 
Nima niti drugotnega ali prikritega pomena niti nobenih domišljijskih elementov, njegovo sporočilo potrošniku pa je preprosto, neposredno in nedvoumno.
For these reasons, it is unlikely to be perceived as a sign of trade origin. 
Zato ni verjetno, da bi se znamka prepoznala kot označba trgovskega izvora.
It is easily seen that the mark consists merely of good counsel, namely that it is better from a health point of view to drink water that has not been sugared. 
Očitno je, da znamka vsebuje le dober nasvet, in sicer da je z zdravstvenega vidika bolje piti vodo, ki ni sladkana.
What better way to promote such goods than by an expression such as DRINK WATER, NOT SUGAR? 
Ni boljšega načina za promocijo takšnega blaga kot uporaba slogana „DRINK WATER, NOT SUGAR“.
Consumers will read this with approval, but will look elsewhere on the product for the trade mark. 
Potrošniki ga bodo prebrali z odobravanjem, vendar bodo poskušali znamko poiskati na drugih mestih na proizvodu.
Classes 35, 36, 41 and 45 Inspirational or motivational statement 02/07/2008, T186/07, EU:T:2008:244 
Razredi 35, 36, 41 in 45 Navdihujoča ali motivacijska izjava 02/07/2008, T186/07, EU:T:2008:244
The relevant English-speaking public will see this as an invitation or encouragement to achieve their dreams and will understand the message that the services covered by that trade mark will allow them to do so. 
Upoštevna angleško govoreča javnost bo to zaznala kot povabilo ali spodbudo, da izpolni svoje sanje, in bo sporočilo razumela tako, kot da ji bodo storitve te blagovne znamke to omogočile.
VALORES DE FUTURO for Class 41 Value statement 06/12/2013, T428/12, EU:T:2013:629 
VALORES DE FUTURO za razred 41 Izjava o vrednotah 06/12/2013, T428/12, EU:T:2013:629
INVESTING FOR A NEW WORLD Classes 35 and 36 Value statement 29/01/2015, T59/14 
INVESTING FOR A NEW WORLD Razreda 35 in 36 Izjava o vrednotah 29/01/2015, T59/14
Given that the services covered by the mark applied for are all related to activities connected with finance and have a close link with the word ‘investing', the Board of Appeal was right to find that the message conveyed by the expression ‘investing for a new world' was that, when purchasing the services in question, the money or capital invested created an opportunity in a new world, which carried a positive connotation. 
Glede na to, da so se vse storitve, ki jih zajema znamka, za katero je bila vložena prijava, nanašale na finance in so tesno povezane z besedo „investing“, je odbor za pritožbe upravičeno ugotovil, da je sporočilo slogana „investing for a new world“ ustvarjanje priložnosti v novem svetu z denarjem ali kapitalom za nakup zadevnih storitev, kar je imelo pozitivno konotacijo.
The Court also found that the fact that the expression at issue could be interpreted in a number of ways did not alter its laudatory nature. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da dejstvo, da se lahko zadevni znak razlaga na več načinov, ne spreminja njegovega poveličevalnega značaja.
SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY Classes 35 and 36 Value statement 29/01/2015, T609/13 
SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY Razreda 35 in 36 Izjava o vrednotah 29/01/2015, T609/13
In the present case, the average reasonably well-informed and reasonably observant and circumspect consumer of the services covered by the application for registration will, on reading or hearing that expression, wonder whether he or she is using his or her money effectively. 
V tem primeru se dobro obveščen ter razumno pozoren in preudaren povprečen potrošnik storitev, ki jih zajema prijava za registracijo, ko prebere ali sliši ta slogan, vpraša, ali učinkovito porablja svoj denar.
PIONEERING FOR YOU Classes 7, 9, 11, 37 and 42 Value statement 12/12/2014, T601/13, EU:T:2014:1067 
PIONEERING FOR YOU Razredi 7, 9, 11, 37 in 42 Izjava o vrednotah 12/12/2014, T601/13, EU:T:2014:1067
Objected to under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR The sign would be understood as ‘innovative for you'. 
Vložen ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The meaning of the sign is clear and does not leave any doubts. 
Znak bi se razumel kot „inovativni za vas“.
It is, as a whole, a simple message that could be attributed to any producer or service provider with the natural consequence that it does not indicate the origin of the goods or services 
Kot celota je preprosto sporočilo, ki ga je mogoče pripisati kateremu koli proizvajalcu ali ponudniku storitev, naravna posledica pa je, da ne navaja izvora blaga ali storitev.
EUTM Classes Case No 
Blagovna znamka EU Razredi Št. zadeve
The mark ‘SITEINSIGHTS' shows some degree of originality and expressiveness, which makes it easy to remember. 
Znamka „SITEINSIGHTS“ kaže neko mero izvirnosti in izraznosti, zaradi česar si jo je mogoče zlahka zapomniti.
It contains a play on words as the word ‘SITE' and the ‘SIGHT' element of ‘INSIGHTS' are pronounced identically. 
Vsebuje besedno igro, saj se beseda „SITE“ in del „SIGHT“ besede „INSIGHTS“ enako izgovorita.
WET DUST CAN'T FLY Classes 3, 7 and 37 22/01/2015, T133/13, EU:T:2015:46 
WET DUST CAN'T FLY Razredi 3, 7 in 37 22/01/2015, T133/13, EU:T:2015:46
The concept of ‘wet dust' is literally inaccurate, since dust is no longer dust when it is wet. 
Koncept „wet dust“ je netočen, saj prah ni več prah, ko je moker.
Consequently, the juxtaposition of those two words gives that concept a fanciful and distinctive character. 
Zato vzporedna postavitev teh dveh besed temu konceptu daje domišljijski in razlikovalni učinek.
Sign Goods and services Reasoning Case No 
Znak Blago in storitve Obrazložitev Št. zadeve
Class 33 The sign consists merely of a normal pentagon, a simple geometric figure. 
Razred 33 Znak je sestavljen samo iz navadnega peterokotnika, ki je preprost geometrijski lik.
The geometric form, if it happened to be the form of the label, would be perceived as having a functional or aesthetic purpose rather than an origin-indicating function. 
Potrošniki bi geometrijski lik, če bi imel obliko etikete, zaznali, kot da ima funkcionalen ali estetski namen, in ne namen navajanja izvora.
Classes 9, 14,16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 28, 35-39, 41-45 The sign will be perceived as an excessively simple geometric shape, essentially as a parallelogram. 
Razredi 9, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 28, 35-39, 41-45 Javnost bo znak zaznala kot preveč preprosto geometrijsko obliko, dejansko paralelogram.
To fulfil the identification function of a trade mark, a parallelogram should contain elements that singularise it in relation to other parallelograms' representations. 
Da bi bilo mogoče znamko prepoznati, bi moral paralelogram vsebovati elemente, zaradi katerih bi bil edinstven v odnosu do drugih predstavitev paralelogramov.
The two characteristics of the sign are the fact that it is slightly inclined towards the right and that the base is slightly rounded and elongated towards the left. 
Dve značilnosti znaka sta, da je nagnjen nekoliko na desno ter da je spodnji del rahlo zaobljen in raztegnjen v levo.
Such nuances would not be perceived by the general consumer. 
Običajni potrošnik ne bi opazil takšnih značilnosti.
Classes 14,18, 25 The sign does not contain any elements that may be easily and instantly memorised by an attentive relevant public. 
Razredi 14, 18, 25 Znak ne vsebuje nobenih elementov, ki bi si jih upoštevna javnost brez težav in hitro zapomnila, tudi če bi bila pozorna.
It will be perceived only as a decorative element, regardless of whether it relates to goods in Class 14 or to those in Classes 18 and 25. 29 
Javnost ga bo zaznala izključno kot okrasni element, ne glede na to, ali se nanaša na blago iz razreda 14 ali na tisto iz razredov 18 in 25. 29
Class 9 The sign consists of a basic equilateral triangle. 
Razred 9 Znak je sestavljen iz navadnega enakostraničnega trikotnika.
The inverted configuration and red outline of the triangle do not serve to endow the sign with distinctive character. 
Obrnjena postavitev in rdeč obris trikotnika znaku ne dajeta razlikovalnega učinka.
The sign's overall impact remains that of a simple geometric shape that is not capable of transmitting a trade mark message prima facie. 
Znak v celoti daje vtis enostavne geometrijske oblike, ki na prvi pogled ne more prenesti sporočila, da gre za znamko.
Classes 3, 18, 24, 43, 44 The sign consists of merely a simple geometric figure in green. 
Razredi 3, 18, 24, 43 in 44 Znak je sestavljen samo iz preprostega zelenega geometrijskega lika.
The specific colour is commonly and widely used in advertising and in the marketing of goods and services for the power to attract without giving any precise message. 
Ta barva se običajno in na splošno uporablja v oglaševanju in trženju blaga in storitev, ker ima moč privabljanja brez navajanja natančnega sporočila.
Classes 35, 41 It is a simple repetition of two basic triangles without any creative arrangement. 
Razreda 35 in 41 Gre za preprosto ponovitev dveh osnovnih trikotnikov brez ustvarjalne priredbe.
Invented example 
Izmišljen primer
Sign Goods and services Reasoning EUTM No 
Znak Blago in storitve Obrazložitev Št. blagovne znamke EU
Classes 35, 41 The sign gives the impression of overlapping triangles, but this is actually just an illusion formed by one single line. 
Razreda 35 in 41 Znak daje občutek prekrivajočih se trikotnikov, vendar je to samo utvara, ki jo ustvarja ena sama črta.
Classes 14, 18 and 25 The GC confirmed the finding of the BoA that the trade mark applied for is devoid of the necessary degree of distinctive character. 
Razredi 14, 18 in 25 Splošno sodišče je potrdilo ugotovitev odbora za pritožbe, da znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, nima potrebne stopnje razlikovalnega učinka.
It consists merely of a punctuation mark with no special additional features immediately apparent to customers, and is a commonplace sign that is frequently used in business or in advertising. 
Sestavljena je zgolj iz ločila brez kakršnih koli posebnih dodatnih lastnosti, ki bi jih potrošniki takoj opazili, in je običajen znak, ki se pogosto uporablja pri poslovanju ali oglaševanju.
Classes 29, 30, 31 and 32 The sign applied for was refused because, in the case of the goods for which the trade mark is protected (foodstuffs and beverages), percentages are particularly important in relation to the price. 
Razredi 29, 30, 31 in 32 Znak, za katerega je bila vložena prijava, je bil zavrnjen, ker so v zvezi z zadevnim blagom (živila in pijače) z zaščiteno blagovno znamko odstotki posebej pomembni v povezavi s ceno.