natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For instance, books (Class 16) and electronic media (Class 9) (goods in competition, with e-media substituting books) are both goods of a publishing house. 
Na primer, knjige (razred 16) in elektronski mediji (razred 9) (medsebojno konkurenčno blago, pri čemer elektronski mediji nadomeščajo knjige) so oboji blago založbe.
Leather belts (Class 25) and leather handbags (Class 18) are not only manufactured in the same sites, for example, leather workshops, but are also manufactured using the same tools and machines for the treatment of leather. 
Usnjeni pasovi (razred 25) in ročne torbe iz usnja (razred 18) se proizvajajo v istih proizvodnih obratih, na primer v usnjarskih delavnicah, vendar se proizvajajo tudi z istim orodjem in stroji za obdelavo usnja.
(Technical) know-how 
(Tehnično) strokovno znanje
Computer virus protection services (Class 42) and software design (Class 42) involve similar technical know-how in the field of information technology. 
Storitve zaščite pred računalniškimi virusi (razred 42) in oblikovanje programske opreme (razred 42) vključujejo podobno tehnično strokovno znanje s področja informacijske tehnologije.
Established trade custom known to the public 
Uveljavljen poslovni običaj, ki je javnosti poznan
An established trade custom, such as when manufacturers expand their businesses to adjacent markets, is of particular importance for concluding whether goods/services of different nature have the same origin. 
Uveljavljen poslovni običaj, kadar na primer proizvajalci razširijo svoja podjetja na sosednje trge, je zlasti pomemben za sprejetje ugotovitve, da imajo blago ali storitve z različno naravo enak izvor.
In such situations, it is necessary to determine whether such expansion is common in the industry or, conversely, whether it may occur in exceptional cases only. 
V takšnih primerih je treba ugotoviti, ali je takšna širitev v neki industrijski panogi običajna ali pa se lahko, prav nasprotno, pojavi samo izjemoma.
Example where extension has become customary 
Primer, ko je širitev postala običajna
Shoes (Class 25) and handbags (Class 18): it is customary in the market for the producers of shoes also to be involved in the manufacture of handbags. 
Čevlji (razred 25) in ročne torbice (razred 18): na trgu je običajno, da se proizvajalci čevljev pogosto ukvarjajo tudi s proizvodnjo ročnih torbic.
Example where extension is not (yet) common 
Primer, ko širitev (še) ni običajna
Clothing (Class 25) and perfumes (Class 3): even though some designers that make fashion clothes nowadays also sell perfumes under their marks, this is not the rule in the clothing industry, and rather applies only to (economically) successful designers. 
Oblačila (razred 25) in parfumi (razred 3): čeprav danes nekateri modni oblikovalci, ki izdelujejo modna oblačila, pod svojo blagovno znamko prodajajo tudi parfume, to v industriji oblačil ni pravilo in velja bolj za (gospodarsko) uspešne oblikovalce.
3.3 Relation between different factors 
Povezava med različnimi dejavniki
The Canon criteria were enumerated in the corresponding judgment without any indication of relationship or hierarchy (weight) among them. 
V sodbi v zadevi Canon so bila merila našteta, ne da bi bila navedena njihova medsebojna povezava ali pomembnost (teža).
They were considered one by one. 
Vsako merilo se je obravnavalo drugo za drugim.
However, they cannot be considered independently since some criteria are interrelated and some criteria are more important than others, regardless of whether goods are being compared with goods, services with services or goods with services. 
Vendar meril ni mogoče obravnavati neodvisno, saj so nekatera medsebojno povezana oziroma pomembnejša od drugih, in sicer ne glede na to, ali se primerja blago z blagom, storitve s storitvami ali blago s storitvami.
As a result of weighing all these factors in accordance with their respective importance in relation to the goods/services at issue, similarity may be found to various degrees: low, average or high (see paragraph 3.3.4 below). 
Zaradi premišljevanja o vseh teh dejavnikih v skladu z njihovim ustreznim pomenom za zadevno blago ali storitve se lahko morebitna podobnost nekoliko razlikuje (glej razdelek 3.3.4 v nadaljevanju).
3.3.1 Interrelation of factors 
Medsebojna povezanost dejavnikov
In many cases there will be relationships between the factors in the sense that where one is shared, another one might coincide as well. 
Dejavniki so v številnih primerih povezani v smislu, da če je eden skupen, se morda ujema tudi drugi.
Based on the purpose, it is also possible to determine who the actual and potential customers (i.e. the relevant public) are. 
Na podlagi namena je mogoče določiti tudi, kdo so dejanske in morebitne stranke (tj. upoštevna javnost).
The purpose, together with the relevant public, may also reveal whether goods/services are in competition. 
Namen lahko skupaj z upoštevno javnostjo razkrije tudi, ali so si blago ali storitve med seboj konkurenčne.
The same distribution channel goes hand in hand with the same public. 
Ista distribucijska pot je povezana z isto javnostjo.
In other words, where the distribution channels are different, the public may be different as well. 
Z drugimi besedami, če so distribucijske poti različne, je morda različna tudi javnost.
Goods/services intended for different publics cannot be complementary (11/05/2011, T74/10, Flaco, EU:T:2011:207, § 40, 22/06/2011; T76/09, Farma Mundi Farmaceuticos Mundi, EU:T:2011:298, § 30). 
Blago ali storitve, namenjene različnima javnostma, ne morejo biti dopolnjevalne (11/05/2011, T74/10, Flaco, EU:T:2011:207, § 40, 22/06/2011; T76/09, Farma Mundi Farmaceuticos Mundi, EU:T:2011:298, § 30).
The method of use usually depends on the nature and purpose of the goods. 
Način uporabe je običajno odvisen od narave in namena blaga.
There are cases in which it is difficult to make a distinction between various factors. 
V nekaterih primerih je težko razlikovati med različnimi dejavniki.
This is particularly true as far as ‘nature', ‘purpose' and ‘method of use' are concerned. 
To velja zlasti za „naravo“, „namen“ in „način uporabe“.
Where the examiner encounters such difficulties, it is sufficient to treat these factors jointly. 
Če se preizkuševalec sreča s takšnimi težavami, zadostuje, da te dejavnike obravnava skupaj.
An engine is a machine for converting any of various forms of energy into mechanical force and motion. 
Motor je stroj za pretvarjanje kakršne koli oblike energije v mehansko silo in gibanje.
In such a case, it is difficult to distinguish the nature from the purpose of the product. 
V takšnem primeru je težko ločiti naravo od namena tega proizvoda.
Therefore, in this case, no distinction between what is nature and what is purpose is necessary. 
Zato v tem primeru razlikovanje med naravo in namenom ni potrebno.
3.3.2 Importance of each factor 
Pomen posameznih dejavnikov
In assessing the similarity of goods and services, all relevant factors characterising the relationship between them should be taken into account. 
Pri presoji podobnosti blaga in storitev je treba upoštevati vse zadevne dejavnike, ki označujejo njihov medsebojni odnos.
However, depending on the kind of goods and services, a particular criterion may be more or less important. 
Vendar je lahko posamezno merilo glede na vrsto blaga in storitev bolj ali manj pomembno.
In other words, the various criteria do not have a standard value; rather, their specific importance should be determined in the context of each individual case. 
Z drugimi besedami, različna merila nimajo standardne vrednosti, temveč je treba njihov poseben pomen določiti za vsak primer posebej.
In general, the weight of each factor will depend on the impact it has on possible confusion regarding origin. 
Na splošno je teža vsakega dejavnika odvisna od učinka, ki ga ima na možno zmedo glede izvora.
Criteria clearly suggesting that the goods/services come or do not come from the same undertaking or economically linked undertakings should take precedence. 
Merila, ki jasno kažejo, da blago ali storitve izvirajo ali ne izvirajo iz istega podjetja ali gospodarsko povezanih podjetij, morajo imeti prednost.
Generally strong factors 
Na splošno pomembni dejavniki
Usual origin (because it has a strong impact on likelihood of confusion, which relates to common commercial origin). 
Običajni izvor (ker močno vpliva na verjetnost zmede, ki je povezana s skupnim trgovskim izvorom).
Purpose (because it is decisive for the choice made by the customer buying or selecting goods/services). 
Namen (ker je odločilen za strankino izbiro, da kupi ali izbere blago ali storitve).
Nature (because it defines the essential qualities and characteristics of the goods/services). 
Narava (ker opredeljuje ključne lastnosti in značilnosti blaga ali storitev).
Complementarity (because the close connection between the use of the goods/services makes the public believe that they share the same source). 
Dopolnjevanje (ker javnost zaradi tesne povezave z uporabo blaga ali storitev meni, da izvirajo iz istega vira).
In competition (usually goods/services that are in competition have the same purpose and target the same public). 
Medsebojna konkurenčnost (običajno imajo blago ali storitve, ki so si med seboj konkurenčne, isti namen in so namenjene isti javnosti).
Less important factors 
Manj pomembni dejavniki
Method of use (even dissimilar goods can be used in the same manner, e.g. baby carriages and shopping trolleys). 
Način uporabe (tudi različno blago je mogoče uporabljati na isti način, npr. otroške vozičke in nakupovalne vozičke).
Distribution channels (even dissimilar goods can be sold in the same section of stores depending on different display practices, e.g. chewing gum (Class 30) and cigarettes (Class 34)). 
Distribucijske poti (tudi različno blago je mogoče prodajati na istem oddelku trgovin, odvisno od različnih praks razstavljanja blaga, npr. žvečilni gumi (razred 30) in cigarete (razred 34)).
Relevant public (especially when goods/services target the general public). 
Upoštevna javnost (zlasti če so blago ali storitve namenjene splošni javnosti).
3.3.3 Different types of comparisons: goods versus goods, services versus services and goods versus services 
Različne vrste primerjav: blago z blagom, storitve s storitvami in blago s storitvami
In principle, the same factors for comparing goods with goods are relevant for the comparison of services with services. 
Načeloma so za primerjavo storitev s storitvami pomembni isti dejavniki kot za primerjavo blaga z blagom.
However, in applying these factors, the basic difference between goods and services (tangible versus intangible) must be considered. 
Pri uporabi teh dejavnikov pa je treba upoštevati osnovno razliko med blagom in storitvami (opredmeteno v primerjavi z neopredmetenimi).
Furthermore, the same principles that apply for the comparison between goods and goods and between services and services also apply in cases where goods are compared with services. 
Poleg tega se enaka načela, kot se uporabljajo za primerjavo blaga z blagom ter storitev s storitvami, se uporabljajo tudi v primerih, kadar se blago primerja s storitvami.
They can, however, be complementary. 
Vendar se lahko blago in storitve medsebojno dopolnjujejo.
Services can also have the same purpose and thus be in competition with goods. 
Storitve lahko imajo tudi isti namen in so zato konkurenčne blagu.
It follows that under certain circumstances similarity between goods and services can be found. 
Iz tega izhaja, da je mogoče v nekaterih primerih ugotoviti podobnost med blagom in storitvami.
3.3.4 Degree of similarity 
Stopnja podobnosti
Goods and/or services can be found similar to different degrees (low, average or high), depending on how many factors they share and the weight given to each of them. 
Za blago in/ali storitve je mogoče ugotoviti različne stopnje podobnosti (nizko, povprečno ali visoko), odvisno od števila skupnih dejavnikov in teže vsakega posameznega dejavnika.
The degree of similarity found between the goods and services is of relevance when making a final decision on the likelihood of confusion. 
Ugotovljena stopnja podobnosti med blagom in storitvami je pomembna pri sprejemanju končne odločitve o verjetnosti zmede.
Generally, one factor on its own is not sufficient for finding similarity between the goods/services, even if it is a strong factor. 
Na splošno en dejavnik sam po sebi ne zadostuje za ugotovitev nizke stopnje podobnosti med blagom ali storitvami, tudi če je pomemben.
Examples of dissimilarity 
Primera za različnost
Cars and bicycles (both in Class 12) share the same purpose (taking oneself from A to B), but this does not make them similar. 
Avtomobili in kolesa (oba razred 12) imajo isti namen (da se nekdo prepelje od točke A do točke B), vendar si zato še niso podobni.
Although window glass (Class 19) and glasses for spectacles (Class 9) have the same nature, they are not similar, since they do not coincide in other relevant factors, such as purpose, producers, distribution channels and relevant public. 
Čeprav imajo steklo za okna (razred 19) in stekla za očala(razred 9) enako naravo, si niso podobna, ker se ne ujemajo v drugih zadevnih dejavnikih, kot so namen, proizvajalci, distribucijske poti in upoštevna javnost.
It is the combination of various factors and their weight that allows the final conclusion on similarity. 
Končno ugotovitev o podobnosti je mogoče sprejeti na podlagi več različnih dejavnikov in njihove teže.
The combination of two strong factors, such as nature and producer, or the combination of one strong and two weak factors will often lead to similarity. 
Kombinacija dveh pomembnih dejavnikov, kot sta narava in proizvajalec, ali kombinacija enega pomembnega in dveh manj pomembnih dejavnikov pogosto vodi v podobnost.
In contrast, the combination of two weak factors, such as distribution channel and relevant public are, in principle, not conclusive for a finding of similarity between the goods and services. 
Nasprotno pa kombinacija dveh manj pomembnih dejavnikov, kot sta distribucijska pot in upoštevna javnost, načeloma ni odločilna za ugotovitev podobnosti med blagom in storitvami.
Examples of similarity 
Primera za podobnost
Milk and cheese (both in Class 29) have a different purpose and method of use; they are not in competition or complementary. 
Mleko in sir (oboje razred 29) imata različen namen in način uporabe; nista si niti konkurenčna niti se ne dopolnjujeta.
However, the fact that they share the same nature (dairy goods) and usual origin (dairy company) is decisive for a finding of similarity. 
Vendar je dejstvo, da imata enaka naravo (mlečna izdelka) in običajen izvor (mlekarsko podjetje), odločilno za ugotovitev podobnosti.
Although pharmaceuticals and plasters (both in Class 5) have a different nature, they share a similar purpose: treating diseases, disabilities or injuries. 
Čeprav imajo farmacevtski pripravki in obliži, obvezilni material (oba razred 5) različno naravo, imajo enak namen, tj. zdravljenje bolezni, invalidnosti ali poškodb.
The number of coinciding factors found, together with their importance/weight, establishes the degree of similarity. 
Število ugotovljenih skupnih dejavnikov skupaj z njihovim pomenom ali težo določa stopnjo podobnosti.
Generally speaking, the higher the number of common factors, the higher the degree of similarity. 
Na splošno velja, da večje ko je število skupnih dejavnikov, višja je stopnja podobnosti.
A similarity found on the basis of only two factors would normally not be high, unlike in cases where the goods/services coincide in four or more relevant factors. 
Podobnost, ugotovljena le na podlagi dveh dejavnikov, običajno ni velika, kar je v nasprotju s primeri, kjer se blago ali storitve ujemajo v štirih ali več zadevnih dejavnikih.
However, no mathematical analysis is possible since it always depends on the specific circumstances of each case. 
Vendar matematična analiza ni mogoča, ker je vedno odvisna od posebnih okoliščin posameznega primera.
Specific Questions on the Similarity of Goods and Services 
Posebna vprašanja v zvezi s podobnostjo blaga in storitev
This part does not establish any new criteria for finding similarity between goods and services. 
V tem delu niso določena nobena nova merila za ugotavljanje podobnosti med blagom in storitvami.
It merely helps to clarify how to compare specific groups of goods and services for which, apart from the Canon criteria, some general rules and exceptions apply. 
Njegov namen je zgolj pomagati pojasniti, kako je treba primerjati posebne skupine blaga in storitev, za katere se poleg meril iz sodbe Canon uporabljajo tudi nekatera splošna pravila in izjeme.
1 Parts, Components and Fittings 
Sestavni deli, komponente in spojni elementi
The mere fact that a certain product can be composed of several components does not automatically establish similarity between the finished product and its parts (27/10/2005, T336/03, Mobilix, EU:T:2005:379, § 61). 
Le dejstvo, da je neki proizvod morda sestavljen iz več komponent, ne zadostuje za samodejno ugotovitev podobnosti med končnim proizvodom in njegovimi sestavnimi deli (27/10/2005, T336/03, Mobilix, EU:T:2005:379, § 61).
Examples of dissimilarity 
Primeri za različnost
Fan blades (Class 7) and hair dryer (Class 11) 
Ventilatorske lopatice (razred 7) in sušilnik za lase (razred 11)
Electric cable (Class 9) and lamp (Class 11) 
Električni kabel (razred 9) in svetilka (razred 11)
Buttons (Class 26) and clothing (Class 25). 
Gumbi (razred 26) in oblačila (razred 25)
Similarity will only be found in exceptional cases and requires that at least some of the main factors for a finding of similarity, such as producer, public and/or complementarity, are present. 
Podobnost je mogoče ugotoviti samo v izjemnih primerih, zanjo pa morajo biti prisotni vsaj nekateri od glavnih dejavnikov za ugotovitev podobnosti, kot so proizvajalec, javnost in/ali dopolnjevanje.
Such an exception is based on the fact that parts and fittings are often produced and/or sold by the same undertaking that manufactures the end product and target the same purchasing public, as in the case of spare or replacement parts. 
Takšna izjema temelji na dejstvu, da sestavne dele in spojne elemente pogosto proizvaja in/ali prodaja isto podjetje, ki proizvaja končni proizvod in ga ponuja isti javnosti, kot je to pri rezervnih ali nadomestnih delih.
Depending on the product involved, the public may also expect the component to be produced by, or under the control of, the ‘original' manufacturer, which is a factor that suggests that the goods are similar. 
Javnost morda glede na zadevni izdelek tudi pričakuje, da komponento proizvaja „prvotni“ proizvajalec ali da se proizvaja pod njegovim nadzorom, kar je dejavnik, ki kaže, da je blago podobno.
In general, a variety of factors may be significant in each particular case. 
Na splošno so v vsakem posameznem primeru pomembni različni dejavniki.
For instance, if the component is also sold independently, or if it is particularly important for the functioning of the machine, this will favour similarity. 
Na primer, če se komponenta prodaja tudi neodvisno ali če je pomembna zlasti za delovanje stroja, bo to potrdilo podobnost.
Examples of similarity 
Primeri za podobnost
Electric toothbrush (Class 21) and replacement brush heads (Class 21) 
Električna zobna ščetka (razred 21) in nadomestne glave zobnih ščetk (razred 21)
Printer (Class 9) and ink jet cartridges (Class 2) 
Tiskalnik (razred 9) in inkjet kartuše (razred 2)
Sewing machines (Class 7) and walking feet for sewing machines (Class 7). 
Šivalni stroji (razred 7) in tačke za šivalne stroje (razred 7)
2 Raw Materials and Semi-Processed Goods 
Surovine in polizdelki
A similar approach is followed in relation to raw materials and semi-processed goods on the one hand and finished goods on the other. 
Podoben pristop se uporablja za surovine in polizdelke na eni strani ter končne izdelke na drugi.
In most cases, the mere fact that one product is used for the manufacture of another will not be sufficient in itself to show that the goods are similar, as their nature, purpose, relevant public and distribution channels may be quite distinct (13/04/2011, T98/09, T Tumesa Tubos del Mediterráneo S.A., EU:T:2011:167, § 4951). 
V večini primerov le dejstvo, da se en proizvod uporablja za izdelavo drugega, samo po sebi ne zadostuje za dokaz, da sta si proizvoda podobna, saj so morda njuna narava, namen, upoštevna javnost in distribucijske poti povsem drugačni (13/04/2011, T98/09, T Tumesa Tubos del Mediterráneo S.A., EU:T:2011:167, § 4951).
According to case-law, the raw materials subjected to a transformation process are essentially different from the finished products that incorporate, or are covered by, those raw materials, in terms of nature, aim and intended purpose (03/05/2012, T270/10, Karra, EU:T:2012:212, § 53). 
V skladu s sodno prakso se surovine, ki se preoblikujejo, bistveno razlikujejo od končnih proizvodov, ki te surovine vključujejo ali so z njimi zajeti v smislu narave, cilja in predvidenega namena (03/05/2012, T270/10, Karra, EU:T:2012:212, § 53).
Furthermore, they are not complementary since one is manufactured with the other, and raw material is in general intended for use in industry rather than for direct purchase by the final consumer (09/04/2014, T288/12, Zytel, EU:T:2014:196, § 39-43). 
Poleg tega se ne dopolnjujejo, saj so eni izdelani iz drugih in so surovine na splošno namenjene uporabi v industriji in ne neposredni prodaji končnemu potrošniku (09/04/2014, T288/12, Zytel, EU:T:2014:196, § 39-43).
Leather, animal skins (Class 18) and clothing (Class 25) 
Živalske kože (razred 18) in oblačila (razred 25)
Precious metals (Class 14) and jewellery (Class 14). 
Žlahtne kovine (razred 14) in nakit (razred 14)
However, the final conclusion may depend on the specific circumstances of the case, such as the degree of transformation of the raw material or whether it is the basic component of the end product. 
Vendar je lahko končna ugotovitev odvisna od posebnih okoliščin primera, kot je stopnja preoblikovanja surovin, ali, če gre za osnovno komponento, od končnega proizvoda.
The greater the significance of the raw material for the end product, the more likely it is that the goods will be similar. 
Pomembnejša ko je surovina za končni proizvod, večja je verjetnost za njuno podobnost.
Consequently, similarity might be established when the raw material or the semi-finished product can be decisive for the form, character, quality or value of the end product. 
Podobnost je zato mogoče ugotoviti, če sta lahko surovina ali polizdelek odločilna za obliko, značaj, kakovost ali vrednost končnega proizvoda.
In these cases, the raw material can often be obtained separately from the end product through the same distribution channels. 
V teh primerih je mogoče surovino pogosto pridobiti ločeno od končnega proizvoda po istih distribucijskih poteh.
Example of similarity 
Primer za podobnost
Precious stones (Class 14) and jewellery (Class 14). 
Kamni za nakit (razred 14) in nakit (razred 14).
Contrary to precious metals, precious stones can be obtained in jewellery shops independently of the end product. 
V nasprotju z žlahtnimi kovinami je kamne za nakit mogoče dobiti v draguljarnah, in to neodvisno od končnega proizvoda.
A subcategory of raw materials is ingredients used for the preparation of foodstuffs (see ingredients below). 
Podkategorija surovin so sestavine, ki se uporabljajo za pripravo živil (glej sestavine v nadaljevanju).
3 Accessories 
Dodatki
‘Accessories' with no further qualification is a vague term as described in paragraph 1.5.2 ‘The relevant scope' above, and should be treated accordingly. 
Izraz „dodatki“ je brez podrobnejše opredelitve nejasen, kot je opisano v odstavku 1.5.2 „Zadevni obseg“ zgoraj, zato ga je treba temu primerno obravnavati.
An accessory is something extra that improves or completes the main product it is added to. 
Dodatek je nekaj, kar izboljša ali dopolni glavni proizvod, h kateremu se doda.