natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its judgment of 10/07/2014, C421/13, Apple Store, EU:C:2014:2070, § 19, the Court of Justice found that a representation that depicts the layout of a retail store may constitute a trade mark provided that it is capable of distinguishing the products or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings. 
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 10/07/2014, C421/13, Apple Store, EU:C:2014:2070, § 19, točka 19, odločilo, da predstavitev, s katero je upodobljena ureditev trgovine na drobno, lahko sestavlja blagovno znamko pod pogojem, da se z njeno pomočjo blago ali storitve nekega podjetja lahko razlikujejo od blaga ali storitev drugih podjetij.
The layout was represented by means of a single design, combining lines, curves and shapes, without any indication of the size or proportions. 
Slikovna predstavitev prostora je zajemala eno sliko, na kateri so bile upodobljene črte, vijuge in oblike, brez navedbe velikosti ali dimenzij.
Following the abovementioned judgment, it cannot be excluded that the requirements for the representation of the layout of a retail store could be satisfied by a design alone, combining lines, curves and shapes, without any specific indication of the size or proportions in the description. 
Glede na navedeno sodbo ni mogoče izključiti, da bi bile zahteve za slikovno predstavitev ureditve trgovine na drobno izpolnjene zgolj s sliko, ki jo sestavljajo črte, vijuge in oblike, brez natančne navedbe velikosti ali dimenzij v opisu.
The Court indicated that in such a case, the trade mark could be registered, provided that the sign is capable of distinguishing the services of the applicant for registration from those of other undertakings and if no other grounds for refusal apply. 
Sodišče je navedlo, da se blagovna znamka v takem primeru lahko registrira, če se lahko storitve prijavitelja registracije na podlagi znaka razlikujejo od storitev drugih podjetij in če ni drugih razlogov za zavrnitev.
As a representation that depicts the layout of a retail store is not strictly covered by any of the types of marks listed in Article 3(3) EUTMIR, the representation must comply with the standards set out in Article 3(1) EUTMIR and may be accompanied by a description clearly specifying the subject matter for which protection is sought. 
Ker prikaza ureditve trgovine na drobno ne zajema izrecno nobena od vrst znamk iz člena 3(3) Izvedbene uredbe, mora prikaz izpolnjevati standarde iz člena 3(1) Izvedbene uredbe in ga lahko spremlja opis, ki jasno določa predmet, za katerega se zahteva varstvo.
2.9.2 Smell/olfactory marks 
Znamke vonja
It is currently not possible to represent smells in compliance with Article 4 EUTMR, as the subject matter of protection cannot be determined with clarity and precision with generally available technology. 
Prikaz vonja v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU trenutno ni mogoč, ker predmeta varstva ni mogoče jasno in natančno ugotoviti s splošno dostopno tehnologijo.
Article 3(9) EUTMIR specifically excludes the filing of samples. 
Člen 3(9) Izvedbene uredbe izrecno izključuje vložitev vzorcev.
The following are examples of non-satisfactory means of representation of a smell. 
V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri neustreznih sredstev za prikaz vonja.
Only specialists in chemistry would recognise the odour in question from such a formula. 
Samo strokovnjak na področju kemije bi lahko zadevni vonj prepoznal na podlagi kemijske formule.
Representation and description in words 
Prikaz in opis z besedami
The representation requirements are not satisfied by: 
Zahteve za prikaz niso izpolnjene z:
a graphic representation of the smell; 
grafičnim prikazom vonja,
a description of the smell in words; 
opisom vonja z besedami,
a combination of both (graphic representation and description in words). 
kombinacijo obeh (grafičnega prikaza in opisa z besedami).
In its judgment of 12/12/2002, C273/00, Sieckmann, EU:C:2002:748, § 69-73, the Court dismissed the possibility of representing an olfactory mark by a chemical formula, by a description in writing, by the deposit of an odour sample or by a combination of those elements. 
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 12/12/2002, C273/00, Sieckmann, EU:C:2002:748, § 69-73, zavrnilo možnost prikaza znamke vonja s kemijsko formulo, pisnim opisom, vložitvijo vzorca vonja ali kombinacijo teh elementov.
There is no generally accepted international classification of smells that would make it possible - as with international colour codes or musical notation - to identify an olfactory sign objectively and precisely by attributing a name or precise code specific to each smell (27/10/2005, T305/04, Odeur de fraise mûre, EU:T:2005:380, § 34). 
Ne obstaja splošno sprejeta mednarodna klasifikacija vonjev, ki bi dopuščala, po zgledu mednarodnih barvnih oznak ali notnih zapisov, objektivno in natančno identifikacijo vonjalnega znaka s pomočjo določitve imena ali natančne oznake, ki je lastna vsakemu vonju (27/10/2005, T305/04, Odeur de fraise mûre, EU:T:2005:380, § 34).
2.9.3 Taste marks 
Znamke okusa
It is currently not possible to represent a taste in compliance with Article 4 EUTMR as Article 3(9) EUTMIR specifically excludes the filing of samples and the subject matter of protection cannot be determined with clarity and precision with generally available technology. 
Prikaz okusa v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU trenutno ni mogoč, ker člen 3(9) Izvedbene uredbe izrecno izključuje vložitev vzorcev in ker predmeta varstva ni mogoče jasno in natančno ugotoviti s splošno dostopno tehnologijo.
The arguments mentioned above under paragraph 2.9.2 similarly apply to taste marks (04/08/2003, R 120/20012, THE TASTE OF ARTIFICIAL STRAWBERRY FLAVOUR (GUSTATORY MARK)). 
Utemeljitve iz zgornjega odstavka 2.9.2 podobno veljajo za znamke okusa (04/08/2003, R 120/20012, THE TASTE OF ARTIFICIAL STRAWBERRY FLAVOUR (ZNAMKA OKUSA)).
2.9.4 Tactile marks 
Tipne znamke
It is currently not possible to represent the tactile effect of a certain material or texture in compliance with Article 4 EUTMR as Article 3(9) EUTMIR specifically excludes the filing of samples and the subject matter of protection cannot be determined with clarity and precision with generally available technology. 
Prikaz tipnega učinka določenega materiala ali strukture v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU trenutno ni mogoč, ker člen 3(9) Izvedbene uredbe izrecno izključuje vložitev vzorcev in ker predmeta varstva ni mogoče jasno in natančno ugotoviti s splošno dostopno tehnologijo.
The arguments mentioned above under paragraph 2.9.2 similarly apply to tactile marks (27/05/2015, R 2588/2014-2, EMBOSSED PATTERN ON A SMOOTH BOTTLE SURFACE (TACTILE MARK)). 
Utemeljitve iz zgornjega odstavka 2.9.2 podobno veljajo za tipne znamke (27/05/2015, R 2588/2014-2, EMBOSSED PATTERN ON A SMOOTH BOTTLE SURFACE (TIPNA ZNAMKA)).
3 Relationship with Other EUTMR Provisions 
Povezava z drugimi določbami Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
If the sign does not meet these requirements and the representation is not clear and precise, the application will not be examined on the basis of the other absolute grounds for refusal. 
Če znak ne izpolnjuje teh zahtev in prikaz ni jasen ter natančen, se prijave ne preizkusi na podlagi drugih absolutnih razlogov za zavrnitev.
According to Article 7(3) EUTMR, the absolute grounds for refusal under Article 7(1)(a) EUTMR cannot be overcome through acquired distinctiveness in consequence of use of the mark. 
V skladu s členom 7(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU absolutnih razlogov za zavrnitev na podlagi člena 7(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni mogoče odpraviti, če je razlikovalni učinek pridobljen z uporabo znamke.
Sign Case No 
Znak Št. zadeve
The colour distribution from the top to the bottom is: very light green, light green, medium green, dark green and very dark green. 
Barvna razporeditev od zgoraj navzdol je: zelo svetlo zelena, svetlo zelena, srednje zelena, temno zelena in zelo temno zelena.
Proportion of the five colours: 20 % each. 
Delež petih barv: 20 % vsaka.
Colour indication: RAL 9018; NCS S 5040G5OY + RAL 9018 1 : 4; NCS S 5040G5OY + RAL 9018 2 : 3; NCS S 5040G50Y + RAL 9018 3 : 2; NCS S 504050Y + RAL 9018 4 : 1: NCS S 5040G50Y. 
Navedba barve: RAL 9018; NCS S 5040G5OY + RAL 9018 1 : 4; NCS S 5040G5OY + RAL 9018 2 : 3; NCS S 5040G50Y + RAL 9018 3 : 2; NCS S 504050Y + RAL 9018 4 : 1: NCS S 5040G50Y.
[T]he contested mark was registered as a colour mark (§ 36). 
Izpodbijana znamka je bila registrirana kot barvna znamka (točka 36).
Consequently … the upright trapezoidal shape is not part of the subject matter of the protection sought and that element does not set contours to the colours, but only serves to indicate how the colours will be applied on the goods at issue. 
Zaradi tega pokončna trapezoidna oblika ni del predmeta, za katerega se zahteva varstvo, element pa ne določa robov barv, ampak je namenjen samo prikazu, kako se bodo barve uporabljale za zadevno blago.
EUTM 9 045 907 (This mark was applied for as ‘other' under the previous regime, indicating that it was a position mark. 
9 045 907 (Ta znamka je bila v skladu s prejšnjim sistemom prijavljena pod vrsto znamke „drugo“, kar kaže, da je bila pozicijska znamka.
The example is given here to show that it can also be filed as a colour mark (combination of colours), showing how the combination appears on the products.) 
Primer je tukaj predstavljen za ponazoritev, da jo je mogoče prijaviti tudi kot barvno znamko (kombinacija barv), ki prikazuje, kako se barvna kombinacija uporablja na proizvodih.)
Example of an unacceptable sound mark 
Primer nesprejemljive zvočne znamke
Description: This is a motion mark in colour. 
Opis: To je barvna znamka gibanja.
The nature of the motion is that of a trailing ribbon with a liquid-like appearance (ribbon). 
Narava gibanja je trak, ki se vleče in pri tem daje videz tekočine (trak).
The ribbon flows around and ultimately into a spherical shape (sphere). 
Trak nato zaokroži in nazadnje zavzame okroglo obliko (krogla).
The motion takes approximately 6 seconds. 
Gibanje traja približno šest sekund.
The stills in the sequence are spaced approximately 0.3 seconds apart and are evenly spaced from the beginning to the end of sequence. 
Razmak med mirujočimi slikami v zaporedju je približno 0,3 sekunde, mirujoče slike pa so enakomerno porazdeljene od začetka do konca zaporedja.
The first still is at top left. 
Prva mirujoča slika je na vrhu levo.
The last still (20th) is the middle one in the bottom row. 
Zadnja mirujoča slika (20.) je srednja v spodnji vrsti.
The stills follow a progression from left to right within each row, before moving down to the next row. 
Mirujoče slike si sledijo od leve proti desni v posamezni vrstici, preden se premaknejo v naslednjo vrstico.
The precise sequence of the stills is as follows: In the 1st still, the ribbon enters the frame in the upper edge of the frame and flows down the right edge of the frame, before flowing upward in the 2nd to 6th stills. 
Točno zaporedje mirujočih slik je: na prvi mirujoči sliki se trak pojavi v okviru na zgornjem robu okvira in se premika navzdol ob desnem robu okvira, preden se začne na 2. do 6. mirujoči sliki premikati navzgor.
During that phase of motion (in the 4th still) the end of the ribbon is shown, producing the effect of a trailing ribbon. 
Med to fazo gibanja (na 4. mirujoči sliki) je prikazan rep traku, kar ustvari učinek vlečenja traku.
In the 6th to 17th stills, the ribbon flows counterclockwise around the frame. 
Na 6. do 17. mirujoči sliki se trak premika v nasprotni smeri urnega kazalca okoli okvira.
From the 9th still onwards, the sphere appears in the centre of the frame. 
Od 9. mirujoče slike se v središču okvira pojavi krogla.
The interior of the sphere is the same colour as the ribbon. 
Notranjost krogle je enake barve kot trak.
The ribbon flows around the sphere. 
Trak se premika okoli krogle.
In the 14th still, the ribbon enters the sphere, as if being pulled inside. 
Na 14. mirujoči sliki trak vstopi v kroglo, kot da ga nekaj vsrka vanjo.
In the 15th to 17th stills, the ribbon disappears inside the sphere. 
Na 15. do 17. mirujoči sliki trak izgine v notranjosti krogle.
EUTM 8 581 977 RED LIQUID FLOWING IN SEQUENCE OF STILLS (MOVEMENT MARK) R 443/20102 
8 581 977 RED LIQUID FLOWING IN SEQUENCE OF STILLS (ZNAMKA GIBANJA) R 443/20102
Description: The mark is an animated sequence with two flared segments that join in the upper right portion of the mark. 
Opis: Znamka je animirano zaporedje s svetlobnima elementoma, ki se združita v zgornjem desnem kotu znamke.
During the animation sequence, a geometric object moves upwards adjacent to the first segment and then downwards adjacent to the second segment, while individual chords within each segment turn from dark to light. 
Med animacijskim zaporedjem se geometrijski lik pomika navzgor neposredno ob prvem segmentu in nato navzdol neposredno ob drugem, posamezne tetive v vsakem segmentu pa se spreminjajo od temnih do svetlih.
The stippling in the mark is for shading only. 
Pike so v znamki uporabljene samo zaradi senčenja.
The entire animated sequence lasts between 1 and 2 seconds. 
Celotna animacija traja od ene do dve sekundi.
Description: The mark consists of an animated sequence on a plain background, namely a door that can be opened in the following three stages: open/mid-open/closed or closed/mid-open/open, using the symbols ‘+' and ‘-'. 
Opis: Znamko sestavlja animirano zaporedje na preprostem ozadju, in sicer vratih, ki jih je mogoče s simboloma „+“ in „-“ odpreti v naslednjih treh stopnjah: odprto/napol odprto/zaprto ali zaprto/napol odprto/odprto.
The length of the animation between the stages is half a second. 
Animacija med stopnjami traja pol sekunde.
The door and its frame are rectangular and are in the style of a basic geometric drawing with a small rectangular handle, opening onto a plain background. 
Vrata in podboj sta pravokotna in v slogu osnovne geometrijske risbe z majhno pravokotno kljuko, preostalo je preprosto ozadje.
The Office rejected the application as it was not possible to establish the precise movement from the description provided along with the graphic representation. 
Urad je prijavo zavrnil, ker ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti natančnega gibanja iz opisa, ki je bil priložen grafičnemu prikazu.
A sign that consists of the opening and closing of a door by pushing buttons on the left or right of the latter is subject to the consumer's personal interpretation. 
Znak, ki ga sestavlja odpiranje in zapiranje vrat s pritiskanjem na gumb na levi ali desni strani, je stvar osebne razlage potrošnika.
The sign therefore cannot fulfil the clarity and precision requirements under Article 4 EUTMR because each consumer would interpret it in a different way and would be subjected to a different sequence of the movement mark. 
Znak zato ne more izpolniti zahtev po jasnosti in natančnosti iz člena 4 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ker bi ga vsak potrošnik razlagal drugače in bi bil dovzeten za različno zaporedje znamke gibanja.
Mark description: Smell of ripe strawberries EUTM No 1 122 118 
Opis znamke: Vonj zrele jagode Blagovna znamka EU št.
The description was found neither unequivocal nor precise and did not eliminate all elements of subjectivity in the process of identifying and perceiving the sign claimed. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da opis ni ne enopomenski ne natančen in ne dopušča neupoštevanja katerega koli subjektivnega elementa pri prepoznavanju in zaznavanju zahtevanega znaka.
Absolute Grounds for Refusal - Non-Distinctive Trade Marks 
Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev - Nerazlikovalne blagovne znamke
CHAPTER 3 
POGLAVJE 3
NON-DISTINCTIVE TRADE MARKS 
NERAZLIKOVALNE BLAGOVNE ZNAMKE
(Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR) 
(člen 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU)
1 General Remarks 3 
1 Splošne opombe 3
2 Word Elements 3 
2 Besedni elementi 4
3 Titles of Books 5 
3 Naslovi knjig 5
4 Single Letters 6 
4 Posamezne črke 6
4.1 General considerations 6 
4.1 Splošne ugotovitve 6
4.2 Examples 7 
4.2 Primeri 7
5 Slogans: Assessing Distinctive Character 7 
5 Slogani: presoja razlikovalnega učinka 7
6 Simple Figurative Elements 11 
6 Enostavni figurativni elementi 11
7 Commonplace Figurative Elements 12 
7 Običajni figurativni elementi 12
10 Common/Non-Distinctive Labels 16 
10 Splošno uporabljene etikete, ki nimajo razlikovalnega učinka 16
11 Shape Marks 18 
11 Oblikovne znamke 18
11.1 Preliminary remarks 18 
11.1 Uvodne pripombe 18
11.2 Shapes unrelated to the goods or services themselves 18 
11.2 Oblike, ki niso povezane z blagom ali storitvami 18
11.3 Shape of the goods themselves or shapes related to the goods or services 18 
11.3 Oblika blaga ali oblike, povezane z blagom ali storitvami 18
11.4 Shape of the packaging 25 
11.4 Oblika embalaže 24
12 Position Marks 27 
12 Pozicijske znamke 27
13 Pattern Marks 29 
13 Znamke z vzorcem 28
14 Colour Marks 32 
14 Barvne znamke 32
14.1 Single Colours 32 
14.1 Posamezne barve 32
14.2 Colour combinations 33 
14.2 Kombinacije barv 33
15 Sound Marks 34 
15 Zvočne znamke 34
16 Motion, Multimedia and Hologram Marks 36 
16 Znamke gibanja, multimedijske znamke in holografske znamke 36
The subject matter of a trade mark is defined by the representation of the trade mark (Article 3(2) EUTMIR). 
Prikaz blagovne znamke opredeljuje predmet znamke (člen 3(2) Izvedbene uredbe).
Specific types of trade mark - namely ‘word mark', ‘figurative mark', ‘shape mark', ‘position mark', ‘pattern mark', ‘colour mark', ‘sound mark', ‘motion mark', ‘multimedia mark', and ‘hologram mark' - are now defined by law (Article 3(3)(a) to (j) EUTMIR). 
Zakonodaja (člen 3(3)(a) do (j) Izvedbene uredbe) zdaj opredeljuje posamezne vrste blagovnih znamk, in sicer „besedno znamko“, „figurativno znamko“, „oblikovno znamko“, „pozicijsko znamko“, „znamko z vzorcem“, „barvno znamko“, „zvočno znamko“, „znamko gibanja“, „multimedijsko znamko“ in „holografsko znamko“.
Marks not covered by those specific types may, however, also be filed as EUTM applications (Article 3(4) EUTMIR). 
Tudi znamke, ki jih te posebne vrste znamk ne zajemajo, se lahko prijavijo kot blagovne znamke EU (člen 3(4) Izvedbene uredbe).
Regarding the formalities for the different types of trade mark, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 2, Formalities, paragraph 10. 
Glede formalnosti v zvezi z različnimi vrstami blagovnih znamk glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 2: Formalnosti, odstavek 10.
According to settled case-law, distinctiveness of a trade mark within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR means that the sign serves to identify the product and/or services in respect of which registration is applied for as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish that product from those of other undertakings (29/04/2004, C468/01 P - C472/01 P, Tabs (3D), EU:C:2004:259, § 32; 21/10/2004, C64/02 P, Das Prinzip der Bequemlichkeit, EU:C:2004:645, § 42; 08/05/2008, C304/06 P, Eurohypo, EU:C:2008:261, § 66; 21/01/2010, C398/08 P, Vorsprung durch Technik, EU:C:2010:29, § 33). 
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso razlikovalni učinek blagovne znamke v smislu člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU pomeni, da ta znamka omogoča, da se ugotovi istovetnost proizvoda in/ali storitev, za katere je bila zahtevana registracija, kot proizvoda in/ali storitev, ki prihajajo iz nekega podjetja, in da se ta proizvod in/ali storitve razlikujejo od proizvodov in/ali storitev drugih podjetij (29/04/2004, C468/01 P - C472/01 P, Tabs (3D), EU:C:2004:259, § 32; 21/10/2004, C64/02 P, Das Prinzip der Bequemlichkeit, EU:C:2004:645, § 42; 08/05/2008, C304/06 P, Eurohypo, EU:C:2008:261, § 66; 21/01/2010, C398/08 P, Vorsprung durch Technik, EU:C:2010:29, § 33).
According to settled case-law, such distinctiveness can be assessed only by reference first to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought and, second, to the relevant public's perception of that sign (12/07/2012, C311/11 P, Wir machen das Besondere einfach, EU:C:2012:460, § 24 and case-law cited). 
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso je treba ta razlikovalni učinek presojati po eni strani glede na proizvode ali storitve, za katere se zahteva registracija, in po drugi strani glede na to, kako znamko zaznava upoštevna javnost (12/07/2012, C311/11 P, Wir machen das Besondere einfach, EU:C:2012:460, § 24 in navedena sodna praksa).
According to the case-law of the European courts, a word mark that is descriptive of characteristics of goods or services for the purposes of Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR is, on that account, necessarily devoid of any distinctive character with regard to the same goods or services for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR (12/06/2007, T190/05, Twist & Pour, EU:T:2007:171, § 39). 
V skladu s sodno prakso evropskih sodišč je besedna znamka, ki je opisna glede lastnosti proizvodov ali storitev v smislu člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, zaradi tega dejstva nujno brez slehernega razlikovalnega učinka glede teh proizvodov ali storitev v smislu člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (12/06/2007, T190/05, Twist & Pour, EU:T:2007:171, § 39).
In a similar vein, even though a given term might not be clearly descriptive with regard to the goods and services concerned, as to the point that an objection under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR would not apply, the term would still be objectionable under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR on the ground that it will be perceived by the relevant public as only providing information on the nature of the goods and/or services concerned and not as indicating their origin. 
Čeprav navedeni izraz morda ni jasno opisen glede zadevnega blaga in storitev in tako ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne bi bil mogoč, bi bil izraz še vedno sporen v skladu s členom 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ker bi ga upoštevna javnost zaznala, kot da zagotavlja samo informacije o lastnostih zadevnega blaga in/ali storitev, ne navaja pa njihovega izvora.
This was the case with the term ‘medi', which was considered as merely providing information to the relevant public about the medical or therapeutic purpose of the goods or of their general reference to the medical field (12/07/2012, T470/09, Medi, EU:T:2012:369, § 22). 
Tako je bilo v zadevi, ki je obravnavala izraz „medi“, za katerega se je štelo, da upoštevni javnosti zagotavlja le informacije o zdravstvenem ali terapevtskem namenu blaga ali njegovi splošni povezavi z zdravstvenim področjem (12/07/2012, T470/09, Medi, EU:T:2012:369, § 22).
An objection under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR would also apply in those cases where the lexical structure employed, although not correct from a grammatical point of view, can be considered to be common in advertising language and in the commercial context at issue. 
Ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU bi bil mogoč tudi, kadar se lahko uporabljena leksikalna struktura, ki sicer ni slovnično pravilna, šteje za običajno v oglaševalskem jeziku in zadevnem trgovinskem okolju.
This was the case for the combination ‘ECO PRO', in which the laudatory element PRO is placed after the descriptive element ECO and which would be perceived by the relevant public as an indication that the designated goods are intended for ‘ecological professionals' or are ‘ecological supporting' (25/04/2013, T145/12, Eco Pro, EU:T:2013:220, § 29-32). 
Tako je bilo v primeru besedne zveze „ECO PRO“, v kateri je poveličevalen element PRO postavljen za opisnim elementom ECO, kar bi upoštevna javnost zaznala, kot da je zadevno blago namenjeno za „ekološke strokovnjake“ ali da „podpira ekologijo“ (25/04/2013, T145/12, Eco Pro, EU:T:2013:220, § 29-32).
2 Word Elements 
Besedni elementi
Words are non-distinctive or cannot confer distinctiveness on a composite sign if they are so frequently used that they have lost any capacity to distinguish goods and services. 
Besede so nerazlikovalne ali ne morejo imeti razlikovalnega učinka za sestavljeni znak, če so tako pogosto uporabljene, da so izgubile vsako možnost razlikovanja blaga in storitev.
The following terms, alone or in combination with other unregistrable elements, fall foul of this provision. 
Naslednji izrazi se bodisi samostojno bodisi v kombinaciji z drugimi elementi, ki jih ni mogoče registrirati, zavrnejo v skladu s to določbo.