natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In cases where the Office does invite the party to submit translations of the evidence, failure to do so within the specified time limit will mean that the untranslated documents will not be taken into account. 
Če Urad stranko pozove, naj predloži prevode dokazov, in ta tega ne stori v določenem roku, to pomeni, da se neprevedeni dokumenti ne bodo upoštevali.
For further guidance on translation of evidence of use, see the Guidelines, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use, paragraph 3.6. 
Za dodatne smernice o prevodu dokaza o uporabi glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi, odstavek 3.6.
3.4 Requests for proof of use 
Zahteve za dokaz o uporabi
Article 19(2) EUTMDR 
Člen 19(2) Delegirane uredbe
The practice regarding proof of use requests according to Article 64(2) or (3) EUTMR, where the EUTM proprietor wishes to request proof of use of the earlier trade marks on which the application for invalidity is based, has been aligned with opposition proceedings (Article 10(1) EUTMDR). 
Praksa v zvezi z zahtevami za dokaz o uporabi na podlagi člena 64(2) ali (3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, v skladu s katero želi imetnik blagovne znamke EU zahtevati dokaz o uporabi prejšnjih blagovnih znamk, na katerih temelji zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti, je bila usklajena s postopkom ugovora (člen 10(1) Delegirane uredbe).
In cancellation proceedings, a request for proof of use must be filed by the EUTM proprietor together with its first reply to the application, within the first time limit set to submit observations according to Article 17(1) EUTMDR. 
V postopku izbrisa mora imetnik blagovne znamke EU zahtevo za dokaz o uporabi vložiti skupaj s svojim prvim odgovorom na zahtevo, in sicer v prvem roku, ki je v skladu s členom 17(1) Delegirane uredbe določen za predložitev pripomb.
If a request for proof of use is submitted by the EUTM proprietor at a later stage of the proceedings, it will not be admissible. 
Če imetnik blagovne znamke EU zahtevo za dokaz o uporabi predloži v poznejši fazi postopka, ta ne bo dopustna.
In addition, according to Article 19(2) EUTMDR, where the EUTM proprietor wishes to request proof of use, it must do so by way of a separate document. 
V skladu s členom 19(2) Delegirane uredbe mora poleg tega imetnik blagovne znamke EU, če želi zahtevati dokaz o uporabi, to storiti v ločeni vlogi.
When defining what a ‘separate document' is, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, paragraph 4.4.1, as the same principles apply. 
V zvezi z opredelitvijo ločene vloge glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, odstavek 4.4.1, saj veljajo enaka načela.
For further guidance on requests for proof of use, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use, paragraph 3. 
Za dodatne navodila o zahtevah za dokaz o uporabi glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi, odstavek 3.
4 Other Issues 
Druga vprašanja
4.1 Continuation of proceedings 
Nadaljevanje postopka
According to Article 105(1) EUTMR, any party to proceedings before the Office that has omitted to observe a time limit vis-à-vis the Office may, upon request, obtain the continuation of proceedings, provided that at the time the request is made the omitted act has been carried out. 
V skladu s členom 105(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU lahko katera koli stranka v postopku pred Uradom, ki ni upoštevala roka Urada, na zahtevo doseže nadaljevanje postopka, če je bilo zamujeno dejanje ob predložitvi zahteve izpeljano.
The request for continuation of proceedings will be admissible only if it is presented within 2 months of the expiry of the unobserved time limit and will not be deemed to have been filed until the corresponding fee has been paid. 
Zahteva za nadaljevanje postopka bo dopustna le, če se predloži v dveh mesecih po preteku neupoštevanega roka, pri čemer se bo štelo, da ni bila vložena, dokler se ne plača ustrezna pristojbina.
This provision is applicable to all the proceedings before the Office. 
Ta določba se uporablja za vse postopke pred Uradom.
For more details, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits. 
Za več podrobnosti glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki.
In cancellation proceedings, continuation of proceedings can be requested for any of the different time limits within the cancellation proceedings (except for the time limit established in Article 68(1) EUTMR to file an appeal). 
V postopku izbrisa se lahko zahteva nadaljevanje postopka za katerega koli od različnih rokov v postopku izbrisa (razen za rok za vložitev pritožbe iz člena 68(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
4.2 Suspensions 
Začasna prekinitev
Article 132 EUTMR 
Člen 132 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 71 EUTMDR 
Člen 71 Delegirane uredbe
In the matter of suspensions, see in general the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters (taking into account, however, that in cancellation proceedings there is no cooling-off period). 
Splošne informacije glede začasne prekinitve so na voljo v Smernicah, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve (ob upoštevanju, da v postopku izbrisa ni obdobja za pobotanje).
Article 71 EUTMDR applies. 
Uporablja se člen 71 Delegirane uredbe.
The main particularity of cancellation proceedings in this matter concerns the specific rules on related actions before European Union trade mark courts. 
Glavna posebnost v postopku izbrisa v tej zadevi se nanaša na posebna pravila o sorodnih tožbah pred sodišči za blagovne znamke Evropske unije.
According to Article 132(2) EUTMR, the Office, when hearing an application for cancellation will, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own motion after hearing the parties or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other parties, suspend the proceedings where the validity of the contested EUTM is already in issue on account of a counterclaim before a European Union trade mark court. 
V skladu s členom 132(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU bo Urad, ko obravnava zahtevo za izbris, razen če obstajajo posebni razlogi za nadaljevanje obravnave, na svojo pobudo po zaslišanju strank ali na zahtevo ene od strank in po zaslišanju drugih strank postopek ustavil, če se veljavnost izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU že izpodbija zaradi nasprotne tožbe pred sodiščem za blagovne znamke Evropske unije.
Article 132(2) EUTMR also states that if one of the parties to the proceedings before the European Union trade mark court so requests, the European Union trade mark court may, after hearing the other parties to these proceedings, suspend the proceedings. 
V členu 132(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je navedeno tudi, da če tako zahteva ena od strank v postopku pred sodiščem za blagovne znamke Evropske unije, lahko sodišče po zaslišanju drugih strank v tem postopku postopek ustavi.
The Office will continue the proceedings pending before it in this case. 
V tem primeru Urad nadaljuje obravnavo.
A request for suspension pursuant to Article 132(2) EUTMR should be supported by relevant evidence. 
Zahtevo za začasno prekinitev v skladu s členom 132(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je treba podpreti z ustreznimi dokazi.
Suspension requests are only considered relevant to the proceedings and might be granted under Article 132(2) EUTMR in cases where they refer to the contested EUTM and not where they refer to other EUTMs contested in parallel cancellation proceedings. 
Zahteve za začasno prekinitev se štejejo za pomembne za postopek in jim je mogoče ugoditi v skladu s členom 132(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU le, če se nanašajo na izpodbijano blagovno znamko EU, ne pa tudi, če se nanašajo na druge blagovne znamke EU, ki se izpodbijajo v vzporednem postopku izbrisa.
4.3 Surrenders, withdrawals and closure of the proceedings 
Odpovedi, umiki in zaključek postopka
Article 57(2) EUTMR 
Člen 57(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 17(5), (6), (7) and (8) EUTMDR 
Člen 17(5), (6), (7) in (8) Delegirane uredbe
4.3.1 Surrenders 
Odpovedi
In principle, the consequences in cancellation proceedings of a total surrender of the contested EUTM (or of a partial surrender of some of the goods and/or services against which the application for cancellation is directed) are similar to those of the withdrawal of an EUTM application in opposition proceedings. 
Načeloma so v postopku izbrisa posledice celotne odpovedi izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU (ali delne odpovedi nekaterega blaga in/ali storitev, na katere se nanaša zahteva za izbris) podobne posledicam umika prijave blagovne znamke EU v postopku ugovora.
However, unlike what occurs with the withdrawal of an EUTM application, the effects of the surrender of a registered EUTM are not the same as those of the decision on the substance terminating the proceedings in question. 
V nasprotju s tem, kar se zgodi pri umiku prijave blagovne znamke EU, pa učinki odpovedi registrirane blagovne znamke EU niso enaki tistim pri meritorni odločbi o prekinitvi zadevnega postopka.
While the surrender of an EUTM only becomes effective on the date on which the surrender is registered, a decision cancelling the EUTM produces its effects from an earlier date, be it from the outset (in the case of invalidity) or from either the date on which the cancellation request was filed or which was fixed in the Office's decision at the request of one of the parties pursuant to Article 62(1) EUTMR (in the case of revocation). 
Odpoved blagovne znamke EU začne veljati na dan registracije, učinki odločbe o izbrisu blagovne znamke EU pa segajo nazaj, in sicer do začetka (v primeru ničnosti) ali bodisi datuma, ko je bila vložena zahteva za izbris, bodisi datuma, določenega v odločbi Urada na zahtevo ene od strank v skladu s členom 62(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (v primeru razveljavitve).
Consequently, despite the declaration of surrender of the contested EUTM, the applicant may still claim to have a legitimate interest in continuing the cancellation proceedings in order to obtain a decision on the substance (24/03/2011, C552/09 P, TiMiKinderjoghurt, EU:C:2011:177, § 39; 22/10/2010, R 463/20094, MAGENTA (col.), § 25-27). 
Zato lahko kljub izjavi o odpovedi izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU vložnik zahteve še vedno trdi, da ima legitimen interes za nadaljevanje postopka izbrisa, v katerem pridobi meritorno odločbo (24/03/2011, C552/09 P, TiMiKinderjoghurt, EU:C:2011:177, § 39; 22/10/2010, R 463/20094, MAGENTA (col.), § 25-27).
However, the claim of legitimate interest must be declared and proven by the applicant (see paragraph 4.3.1.2 below). 
Vendar mora vložnik zahteve prijaviti legitimni interes in ga dokazati (glej odstavek 4.3.1.2 v nadaljevanju).
In practice, when there is a total or partial surrender of an EUTM that is subject to cancellation proceedings, and this surrender affects the scope of the proceedings, the Office will suspend the registration of the surrender and, in parallel, will notify the cancellation applicant of the surrender, inviting it to inform the Office whether it withdraws the application in view of the declared surrender. 
Če se v praksi blagovna znamka EU, v zvezi s katero poteka postopek izbrisa, odpove v celoti ali delno in ta odpoved vpliva na obseg postopka, bo Urad začasno prekinil registracijo odpovedi in hkrati vložnika zahteve za izbris obvestil o odpovedi ter ga pozval, naj ga obvesti, ali zaradi prijavljene odpovedi umika zahtevo.
The consequence for the parties and the Office will depend not only on the reply of the applicant, but also on the type of cancellation proceedings in question, that is to say, whether the cancellation action is an application for revocation or whether it is an application for a declaration of invalidity. 
Posledice za stranke in Urad ne bodo odvisne le od odgovora vložnika zahteve, temveč tudi od vrste zadevnega postopka izbrisa, to je od tega, ali je zahteva za izbris zahteva za razveljavitev ali zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti.
4.3.1.1 Application for revocation pending 
Nerešena zahteva za razveljavitev
If, in reply to the Office's letter, the applicant replies by withdrawing the application for revocation as a consequence of the surrender, the surrender will be recorded and the proceedings will be closed without a decision on the substance. 
Če vložnik zahteve v odgovor na dopis Urada zaradi odpovedi umakne zahtevo za razveljavitev, se odpoved evidentira, postopek pa se konča brez meritorne odločbe.
The application will be withdrawn. 
Zahteva bo umaknjena.
If the applicant does not reply, the suspension of the surrender will be maintained and the cancellation proceedings will continue until there is a final decision on the substance. 
Če vložnik zahteve ne odgovori, se prekinitev odpovedi ohrani, postopek izbrisa pa se nadaljuje, dokler ni sprejeta dokončna meritorna odločba.
After the decision on the cancellation has become final, the surrender will be recorded only for the goods and/or services for which the contested EUTM has not been revoked, if any. 
Po dokončnosti odločbe o izbrisu se odpoved zabeleži samo za blago in/ali storitve, za katere izpodbijana blagovna znamka EU ni bila razveljavljena, če obstajajo.
4.3.1.2 Application for a declaration of invalidity pending 
Nerešena zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti
If, in reply to the Office's letter, the applicant replies by withdrawing the application for a declaration of invalidity as a consequence of the surrender, the surrender will be recorded and the proceedings will be closed without a decision on the substance. 
Če vložnik zahteve v odgovor na dopis Urada zaradi odpovedi umakne zahtevo za ugotovitev ničnosti, se odpoved evidentira, postopek pa se konča brez meritorne odločbe.
If the applicant does not reply, the surrender will be recorded and the cancellation proceedings will continue for the remaining goods and/or services against which the cancellation is directed that were not removed by the partial surrender, if any. 
Če vložnik zahteve ne odgovori, se odpoved evidentira, postopek izbrisa pa se nadaljuje za preostalo blago in/ali storitve, zoper katere je usmerjen izbris in ki niso bile odstranjene z delno odpovedjo, če obstajajo.
If all of the contested goods are removed by the surrender, the invalidity proceedings will be closed without a decision on the substance. 
Če je z odpovedjo odstranjeno vse izpodbijano blago, se postopek za ugotavljanje ničnosti konča brez meritorne odločbe.
The application will be closed due to the surrender. 
Zahteva se zaradi odpovedi konča.
If the applicant replies and declares to have a legitimate interest in obtaining a decision on the substance, the Office will assess the request. 
Če vložnik zahteve odgovori in izjavi, da ima legitimen interes za pridobitev meritorne odločbe, bo Urad proučil njegovo zahtevo.
A claim to a legitimate interest will only be accepted where the applicant claims and proves why a decision on the substance of the declaration of invalidity is required, and why the surrender of the contested mark is not sufficient. 
Trditev o legitimnem interesu bo sprejeta le, če vložnik zahteve trdi, da je potrebna meritorna odločba o ugotovitvi ničnosti, in dokaže, zakaj je potrebna, pa tudi, zakaj odpoved izpodbijani blagovni znamki ne zadostuje.
Claims without any supporting evidence and without any explanation as to why the surrender of the mark is insufficient (as opposed to a declaration of invalidity) will be rejected. 
Zahteve brez dokazov in pojasnila, zakaj odpoved blagovni znamki ne zadostuje (v nasprotju z ugotovitvijo ničnosti), bodo zavrnjene.
In addition, the legitimate interest must be real, direct and present. 
Poleg tega mora biti legitimni interes resničen, neposreden in sedanji.
Requests based on possible future conflicts or presumed conflict arising from the conversion of the contested EUTM to a national registration will be rejected. 
Zahteve, ki temeljijo na možnih prihodnjih nasprotjih ali domnevnih nasprotjih, ki izhajajo iz konverzije izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU v nacionalno registracijo, bodo zavrnjene.
As cases where a legitimate interest is claimed will mostly involve pending court proceedings, the party claiming this interest must lay out the relief sought in these court proceedings. 
Ker zadeve, v katerih se zatrjuje legitimni interes, vključujejo predvsem sodne postopke v teku, mora stranka, ki zatrjuje ta interes, določiti ukrep, ki se zahteva v teh sodnih postopkih.
Only in cases where a legitimate interest is claimed and proven by the applicant, will the Office maintain the suspension of the surrender. 
Urad bo ustavitev odpovedi ohranil le, če vložnik zahteve, ki zatrjuje legitimni interes, tega tudi dokaže.
In all other cases, the surrender will be recorded and the cancellation proceedings will continue for the remaining goods and/or services against which the cancellation is directed that were not removed by the partial surrender, if any. 
V vseh drugih primerih se odpoved evidentira, postopek izbrisa pa se nadaljuje za preostalo blago in/ali storitve, zoper katere je usmerjen izbris in ki niso bile odstranjene z delno odpovedjo, če obstajajo.
If all of the contested goods are removed by the surrender, the invalidity proceedings will be closed without a decision on the substance. 
Če je z odpovedjo odstranjeno vse izpodbijano blago, se postopek za ugotovitev ničnosti konča brez meritorne odločbe.
4.3.1.3 The surrender predates the cancellation application 
Odpoved je starejša od zahteve za izbris
Where surrender is declared before the filing of the cancellation action, but had not yet been entered into the Register at the time of filing the application, the Office will take note of the surrender and enter it in the Register, irrespective of the filing of any later cancellation actions, including applications for revocation where the cancellation applicant asks for an earlier date to be fixed pursuant to Article 62(1) EUTMR. 
Če je odpoved prijavljena pred vložitvijo zahteve za izbris, vendar ob vložitvi zahteve še ni bila vpisana v register, jo bo Urad upošteval in vpisal v register ne glede na vložitev katerih koli poznejših zahtev za izbris, vključno z zahtevami za razveljavitev, kadar vložnik zahteve za izbris na podlagi člena 62(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU zahteva določitev zgodnejšega datuma.
For the Office to suspend the entry in the Register of the surrender as explained above, it must have been declared subsequent to the submission of the cancellation application. 
Urad bo vpis odpovedi v register, kot je bilo pojasnjeno zgoraj, ustavil le, če je bila prijavljena po vložitvi zahteve za izbris.
4.3.1.4 Partial surrender does not affect the extent of the cancellation 
Delna odpoved ne vpliva na obseg izbrisa
Where a partial surrender does not affect any of the contested goods and/or services, the partial surrender will be registered as described in the Guidelines, Part E, Register Operations, Section 1, Changes in a Registration, and the applicant in the cancellation proceedings will not be informed. 
Če delna odpoved ne vpliva na izpodbijano blago in/ali storitve, bo delna odpoved evidentirana, kot je opisano v Smernicah, del E: Registri, razdelek 1: Spremembe registracije, vložnik zahteve v postopku izbrisa pa o tem ne bo obveščen.
4.3.1.5 Surrender to be filed by way of a separate document 
Odpoved je treba vložiti z ločeno vlogo
According to Article 17(7) EUTMDR, during the course of cancellation proceedings, where the EUTM proprietor wishes to surrender the contested mark, it must do so by way of a separate document. 
Če se v skladu s členom 17(7) Delegirane uredbe imetnik blagovne znamke EU med postopkom izbrisa želi odpovedati izpodbijani blagovni znamki, mora to storiti z ločeno vlogo.
4.3.2 Withdrawals 
Umiki
The cancellation applicant can withdraw its application for cancellation at any time of the proceedings. 
Vložnik zahteve za izbris lahko to zahtevo umakne na kateri koli stopnji postopka.
The Office will inform the EUTM proprietor about the withdrawal and close the proceedings. 
Urad bo imetnika blagovne znamke EU obvestil o umiku in končal postopek.
4.3.3 Contested mark expires or is cancelled in parallel proceedings 
Veljavnost izpodbijane znamke poteče ali je ta izbrisana v vzporednem postopku
Similarly to the process explained above in paragraph 4.3.1.2, where some (or all) of the contested goods and services are removed as a consequence of the final expiry of the contested EUTM, or as a consequence of a refusal in parallel revocation proceedings, the Office will inform the applicant and invite it to inform the Office whether it has a legitimate interest in obtaining a decision on the merits from an earlier date. 
Podobno kot v postopku, opisanem zgoraj odstavku 4.3.1.2, v katerem se nekatero (ali vse) izpodbijano blago in storitve odstranijo zaradi dokončnega poteka veljavnosti izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU ali zaradi zavrnitve v vzporednem postopku za razveljavitev, bo Urad vložnika zahteve o tem obvestil in ga pozval, naj ga obvesti, ali ima legitimen interes za pridobitev meritorne odločbe od zgodnejšega datuma.
The same applies as has already been explained in paragraph 4.3.1.2, where a legitimate interest will have to be claimed and proven by the applicant. 
Kot je bilo že pojasnjeno v odstavku 4.3.1.2, enako velja, kadar mora vložnik zahteve uveljavljati legitimni interes in ga dokazati.
If a legitimate interest is not claimed or proven, or where the contested mark was invalidated from the outset in the parallel invalidity proceedings, the proceedings will be closed without a decision on the substance. 
Če se legitimni interes ne uveljavlja ali dokaže oziroma če je bila izpodbijana znamka v vzporednem postopku za ugotovitev ničnosti od začetka razglašena za nično, se postopek konča brez meritorne odločbe.
The application will be closed due to the expiry or cancellation of the contested mark in the parallel case. 
Zahteva se konča zaradi poteka veljavnosti izpodbijane znamke ali zaradi njenega izbrisa v vzporedni zadevi.
In the event that the expiry or the cancellation in parallel proceedings does not remove all of the contested goods, and a legitimate interest has not been claimed or proven, the proceedings will continue for the remaining goods and/or services against which the cancellation is directed that were not removed. 
Če se v primeru poteka veljavnosti ali izbrisa v vzporednem postopku ne odstrani vse izpodbijano blago in se legitimni interes ni uveljavljal ali ni bil dokazan, se bo postopek nadaljeval za preostalo blago in/ali storitve, zoper katere je usmerjen izbris in ki niso bile odstranjene.
4.3.4 Decision on the apportionment of costs 
Odločba o porazdelitvi stroškov
Article 109(4) and (6) EUTMR 
Člen 109(4) in (6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
The party that terminates the proceedings by withdrawing the application for revocation or the application for a declaration of invalidity, or by not renewing registration of the EUTM, or by surrendering the EUTM, will bear the fees and the costs incurred by the other party (Article 109(4) EUTMR), except in cases where the withdrawal is a consequence of a surrender (see paragraphs 4.3.1.1 and 4.3.1.2 above), in which case the costs will be borne by the EUTM proprietor. 
Stranka, ki ustavi postopek z umikom zahteve za razveljavitev ali zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti, ali tako, da ne podaljša registracije blagovne znamke EU ali se blagovni znamki EU odpove, bo plačala pristojbine in stroške, ki jih ima druga stranka (člen 109(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), razen če je umik posledica odpovedi (glej odstavka 4.3.1.1 in 4.3.1.2 zgoraj), v tem primeru stroške krije imetnik blagovne znamke EU.
In addition, the parties may indicate that a surrender or a withdrawal is a consequence of an agreement they have reached, and that a decision on costs is not necessary. 
Stranki lahko poleg tega navedeta, da je odpoved ali umik posledica dogovora, ki sta ga dosegli, in da odločba o stroških ni potrebna.
The Office will not issue a decision on costs if such a request is received together with a request for surrender or withdrawal and is signed by both parties. 
Urad ne bo izdal odločbe o stroških, če takšno zahtevo, ki sta jo podpisali obe stranki, prejme skupaj z zahtevo za odpoved ali umik.