natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The application was allocated to the Court &amp; apos;s Third Section (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court), which decided on 10 November 2006 to notify the respondent Government of it as a matter of urgency under Rule 40 of the Rules of Court and to grant priority to it under Rule 41.
Pritožba je bila dodeljena tretjemu oddelku Sodišča (prvi odstavek 52. člena Poslovnika Sodišča), ki je 10. novembra 2006 sklenil, da o njej kot nujni zadevi obvesti toženo vlado po 40. členu Poslovnika Sodišča in da zanjo odobri prednostno obravnavo po 41. členu poslovnika.
The respondent Government and the applicants replied to the Serbian Government &amp; apos;s comments.
Tožena vlada in pritožniki so odgovorili na pripombe srbske vlade.
The complaints of Mr and Mr, who had been granted permanent residence permits, and the remainder of the other applicants &amp; apos; complaints were declared inadmissible.
Pritožbi, ki sta pridobila dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje, ter preostali del pritožb drugih pritožnikov so bili razglašeni za nesprejemljive.
In addition, third-party comments were received from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ( &amp; quot;UNHCR &amp; quot;), which had been given leave by the President to intervene in the written procedure before the Grand Chamber (Article 36 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 44 § 3).
Prejete so bile tudi pripombe tretje strani, Urada visokega komisarja ZN za begunce (UNHCR), ki mu je predsednik dovolil, da posreduje v pisnem postopku pred velikim senatom (drugi odstavek 36. a konvencije in tretji odstavek 44. člena poslovnika).
The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ( &amp; quot;the SFRY &amp; quot;) was a federal State composed of six republics: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Montenegro and Macedonia.
Socialistična federativna republika Jugoslavija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SFRJ) je bila zvezna država, sestavljena iz šestih republik: Bosna in Hercegovina, Hrvaška, Srbija, Slovenija, Črna gora in Makedonija.
SFRY nationals had &amp; quot;dual citizenship &amp; quot; for internal purposes, that is, they were citizens both of the SFRY and of one of the six republics.
Državljani SFRJ so imeli za notranje namene &amp; quot;dvojno državljanstvo &amp; quot;, kar pomeni, da so bili državljani SFRJ in tudi ene od šestih republik.
In principle, a child acquired his or her parents &amp; apos; citizenship; if the parents were citizens of different republics, they jointly agreed on their child &amp; apos;s citizenship.
Načeloma je otrok pridobil državljanstvo po svojih starših; če so bili starši državljani različnih republik, so se dogovorili o državljanstvu otroka.
On the date of acquisition of the citizenship of another republic, a person &amp; apos;s prior republic citizenship came to an end.
Z datumom pridobitve državljanstva druge republike je prejšnje republiško državljanstvo osebe prenehalo.
On 6 December 1990, the then Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia adopted the &amp; quot;Statement of Good Intentions &amp; quot; (Izjava o dobrih namenih), guaranteeing that all persons with permanent residence on Slovenian territory would be enabled to acquire Slovenian citizenship if they so wished (see paragraph 200 below).
6. decembra 1990 je takratna Skupščina Republike Slovenije sprejela Izjavo o dobrih namenih, ki je zagotavljala vsem osebam s stalnim prebivališčem na slovenskem ozemlju, da bodo lahko pridobili slovensko državljanstvo, če bodo to želeli (glej 200. odstavek).
A series of laws termed &amp; quot;the independence legislation &amp; quot; were passed.
Sprejeta je bila vrsta zakonov, imenovana &amp; quot;osamosvojitvena zakonodaja &amp; quot;.
This included the Citizenship of the Republic of Slovenia Act (Zakon o državljanstvu Republike Slovenije - &amp; quot;the Citizenship Act &amp; quot;), the Aliens Act (Zakon o tujcih, see paragraphs 205-207 below), the National Border Control Act (Zakon o nadzoru državne meje) and the Passports of the Citizens of Slovenia Act (Zakon o potnih listinah državljanov Republike Slovenije).
Vključevala je Zakon o državljanstvu Republike Slovenije, Zakon o tujcih (glej 205.- 207. odstavek), Zakon o nadzoru državne meje in Zakon o potnih listinah državljanov Republike Slovenije.
Section 40 of the Citizenship Act, which entered into force on 25 June 1991, provided that citizens of the former SFRY republics who were not citizens of Slovenia ( &amp; quot;citizens of the former SFRY republics &amp; quot;) could acquire Slovenian citizenship if they met three requirements:
Zakon o državljanstvu, ki je začel veljati 25. junija 1991, je v 40. členu določal, da državljani republik nekdanje SFRJ, ki niso bili državljani Slovenije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: državljani republik nekdanje SFRJ), lahko pridobijo slovensko državljanstvo, če izpolnjujejo tri pogoje:
After the declaration of independence, the Ministry of the Interior ( &amp; quot;the Ministry &amp; quot;) sent several unpublished internal instructions (okrožnice, navodila, depeše) to municipal administrative authorities relating to the implementation of the independence legislation, and in particular the Aliens Act.
Po razglasitvi neodvisnosti je Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ministrstvo) poslalo občinskim upravnim organom več neobjavljenih notranjih navodil (okrožnice, navodila, depeše) v zvezi z izvajanjem osamosvojitvene zakonodaje, zlasti Zakona o tujcih.
On 26 February 1992, the date on which the second subsection of section 81 of the Aliens Act became applicable, the municipal administrative authorities removed those who had not applied for or obtained Slovenian citizenship from the Register of Permanent Residents (Register stalnega prebivalstva - &amp; quot;the Register &amp; quot;) and, according to the Government, transferred them into the Register of Aliens without a Residence Permit.
26. februarja 1992, ko se je začel uporabljati drugi odstavek 81. člena Zakona o tujcih, so občinski upravni organi izbrisali iz Registra stalnega prebivalstva (v nadaljnjem besedilu: register) tiste osebe, ki niso zaprosile za slovensko državljanstvo ali ga pridobile in jih po navedbah vlade prenesli v Register tujcev brez dovoljenja za prebivanje.
It drew their attention to the fact that numerous problems were expected to arise; the legal status of the persons concerned should be regulated and, in parallel, &amp; quot;the clearing of records &amp; quot; should be undertaken.
Opozorilo jih je, da se pričakujejo številne težave; pravni status teh oseb je treba urediti in hkrati je treba začeti &amp; quot;čistiti evidence &amp; quot;.
In addition, the Ministry pointed out that the papers of such persons, even if issued by the Slovenian authorities and formally valid, would in fact become invalid owing to the persons &amp; apos; change in status ex lege.
Poleg tega je opozorilo, da bodo dokumenti teh oseb, čeprav so jih izdali slovenski organi in so formalnoveljavni, dejansko postali neveljavni zaradi spremembe v statusu oseb po zakonu (ex lege).
They became known as the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; (izbrisani), and included the applicants in the present case.
Postali so znani kot izbrisani in med njimi so bili tudi pritožniki v obravnavani zadevi.
New data on the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; were collected in 2009 (see paragraph 69 below).
Novi podatki o izbrisanih so bili zbrani leta 2009 (glej 69. odstavek).
As a result, the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; became aliens or stateless persons illegally residing in Slovenia.
Posledično so izbrisani postali tujci ali osebe brez državljanstva, ki so prebivali v Sloveniji nezakonito.
Among the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; were 5,360 minors.
Med izbrisanimi je bilo 5360 mladoletnih oseb.
Some of the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; voluntarily left Slovenia.
Nekateri od izbrisanih so Slovenijo zapustili prostovoljno.
The Government maintained that, further to this letter, they took action in order to attenuate the consequences of the &amp; quot;erasure &amp; quot; by interpreting the provisions of the Aliens Act in a more flexible manner (see paragraph 36 below).
Vlada je trdila, da je na podlagi tega dopisa ukrepala in določbe Zakona o tujcih razložila prožneje (glej 36. odstavek), da bi omilila posledice izbrisa.
On 3 September 1992 the Government decided to take into account the period before the entry into force of the Aliens Act for the purposes of calculating the required period of three years &amp; apos; residence in Slovenia for issuing a permanent residence permit.
3. septembra 1992 je vlada sklenila, da pri določanju obdobja treh let prebivanja v Sloveniji, predpisanega za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje, upošteva obdobje pred začetkom veljavnosti Zakona o tujcih.
In the years that followed, several non-governmental organisations, including Amnesty International and Helsinki Monitor, and the Slovenian Human Rights Ombudsman issued reports drawing attention to the situation of the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot;.
V naslednjih letih so številne nevladne organizacije, med njimi Amnesty International in Helsinški monitor ter slovenski varuh človekovih pravic, izdali poročila, v katerih so opozorili na položaj izbrisanih.
It further found that there was no legal basis for this measure; the Inhabitants &amp; apos; Evidence of Residence and Population Registry Act did not provide for ex lege deregistration.
Ugotovilo je tudi, da ni bilo nobene pravne podlage za ta ukrep; v samem Zakonu o evidenci nastanitve občanov in o registru prebivalstva (ex lege) odjava ni bila predvidena.
In the Constitutional Court &amp; apos;s view, in the light of modern developments in human-rights protection, the situation of persons who had held the nationality of the predecessor but not of the successor State, with permanent residence on the territory of States that had disintegrated after 1990, had become a matter governed by international agreements.
Po mnenju ustavnega sodišča in z vidika sodobnega razvoja varstva človekovih pravic bi morali položaj oseb, ki so imele stalno prebivališče na ozemlju po letu 1990 razpadlih držav in državljanstvo države predhodnice, ne pa tudi države naslednice, urejati mednarodni sporazumi.
As a consequence, the Act on Regularisation of the Legal Status of Citizens of Other Successor States to the Former SFRY in Slovenia (Zakon o urejanju statusa državljanov drugih držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ v Republiki Sloveniji - &amp; quot;the Legal Status Act &amp; quot;) was passed on 8 July 1999 to regulate the legal status of the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; by simplifying the requirements for acquiring a permanent residence permit.
Posledično je bil 8. julija 1999 sprejet Zakon o urejanju statusa državljanov drugih držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ v Republiki Sloveniji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZUSDDD), da uredi pravni status izbrisanih s poenostavitvijo zahtev za pridobitev dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje.
Relying on its leading decision of 4 February 1999 (see paragraphs 41-48 above), the Constitutional Court has given several decisions in individual cases brought by some of the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot;.
Ustavno sodišče je na podlagi svoje temeljne odločbe z dne 4. februarja 1999 (glej 41.-48. odstavek) izdalo več odločb v posameznih primerih, ki so jih predložili nekateri izbrisani.
On 1 July 1999 (Up-333/96) it examined the case of a claimant who had been refused the renewal of his driving licence because of the &amp; quot;erasure &amp; quot; of his name from the Register.
1. julija 1999 (Up-333/96) je obravnavalo primer pritožnika, ki mu je bilo zavrnjeno podaljšanje vozniškega dovoljenja zaradi izbrisa njegovega imena iz registra.
On 18 November 1999 (Up-20/97) and 16 December 1999 (Up-152/97), in cases concerning the payment of a military pension to two &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; persons, the Constitutional Court quashed the judgment of the Supreme Court and sent the case back for re-examination.
Ustavno sodišče je 18. novembra 1999 (Up-20/97) in 16. decembra 1999 (Up-152/97) v primerih, povezanih s plačilom vojaške pokojnine dvema izbrisanima osebama, razveljavilo sodbo vrhovnega sodišča in vrnilo zadevo v ponovno odločanje.
On 20 September 2001, in a case (Up-336/98) concerning an individual &amp; apos;s right to a childcare allowance, the Constitutional Court quashed the decisions of the lower authorities and sent the case back for re-examination.
Ustavno sodišče je 20. septembra 2001 v primeru (Up-336/98), povezanem s pravico osebe do preživnine, razveljavilo odločbe organov nižje stopnje in vrnilo zadevo v ponovno odločanje.
Furthermore, the Constitutional Court has examined a number of cases brought by &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; persons concerning the conditions for acquiring Slovenian citizenship.
Ustavno sodišče je obravnavalo tudi številne zadeve, ki so jih predložili izbrisani in so bile povezane s pogoji za pridobitev slovenskega državljanstva.
In a decision of 6 July 1995 (Up-38/93) it held that the condition of &amp; quot;actually residing in Slovenia &amp; quot; in section 40 of the Citizenship Act (see paragraphs 25 above and 205 below) could be fulfilled in a situation where a person &amp; apos;s residence in Slovenia had been interrupted on justifiable grounds if there were other circumstances proving that the centre of his or her life interests was on Slovenian territory.
V odločbi z dne 6. julija 1995 (Up-38/93) je razsodilo, da je pogoj &amp; quot;dejanskega življenja v Sloveniji &amp; quot; v 40. členuu Zakona o državljanstvu (glej 25. in 205. odstavek) lahko izpolnjen, kadar je bilo prebivanje osebe v Sloveniji prekinjeno zaradi opravičljivih razlogov, če so druge okoliščine dokazovale, da je bilo središče njenih življenjskih interesov na slovenskem ozemlju.
It quashed the Supreme Court &amp; apos;s decision because there had been differential treatment of analogous cases and sent the case back for re-examination.
Razveljavilo je odločbo vrhovnega sodišča, ker so bili podobni primeri obravnavani različno, in vrnilo zadevo v ponovno odločanje.
On 3 April 2003, ruling on a challenge to the constitutionality of the Legal Status Act in its version of 8 July 1999 in a case (U-I-246/02) brought by the Association of the &amp; quot;Erased &amp; quot; and by other &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; persons, the Constitutional Court found the Legal Status Act unconstitutional because it did not grant retrospective permanent residence from the date of the &amp; quot;erasure &amp; quot;, it did not define the meaning of the words &amp; quot;actually residing &amp; quot; which appeared in section 1 and it failed to regulate the acquisition of permanent residence for citizens of former SFRY republics who had been forcibly removed from Slovenia pursuant to section 28 of the Aliens Act.
Pri razsojanju o pobudi za presojo ustavnosti ZUSDDD, sprejetega 8. julija 1999, je ustavno sodišče 3. aprila 2003 v primeru (U-I-246/02), ki so ga predložili Društvo izbrisanih prebivalcev Slovenije in drugi izbrisani, odločilo, da je ZUSDDD protiustaven, ker ni priznaval stalnega prebivanja za nazaj od datuma izbrisa, ni opredelil pomena izraza &amp; quot;dejansko življenje &amp; quot; iz 1. člena in ni uredil pridobitve stalnega prebivališča za državljane republik nekdanje SFRJ, ki so bili prisilno izgnani iz Slovenije na podlagi 28. člena Zakona o tujcih.
Although the exact number of those deported was unknown, the Constitutional Court considered that the numbers would probably be low, since the unregulated status of the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; had generally been tolerated.
Čeprav točno število oseb, ki so bile prisilno izgnane, ni bilo znano, je ustavno sodišče menilo, da je bilo verjetno majhno, saj se je neurejen status izbrisanih na splošno dopuščal.
In point no. 8 of the operative part of the decision, the Constitutional Court ordered the Ministry to issue, ex proprio motu, decisions establishing permanent residence in Slovenia ex tunc with effect from 26 February 1992, the date of the &amp; quot;erasure &amp; quot;, to those who already had ex nunc (non-retroactive) permits in accordance with the Legal Status Act or the Aliens Act (extracts of this decision are quoted in paragraph 215 below).
V 8. točki izreka odločbe je ustavno sodišče odredilo ministrstvu, da iz lastnega nagiba (ex proprio motu) izda odločbe o ugotovitvi stalnega prebivanja v Sloveniji z učinkom za nazaj (ex tunc) z veljavnostjo od 26. februarja 1992, dneva izbrisa, vsem, ki so že imeli dovoljenja z učinkom za naprej (ex nunc) v skladu z ZUSDDD ali Zakonom o tujcih (izvlečki iz te odločbe so navedeni v 215. odstavku).
On 25 November 2003 Parliament enacted the Act on the Application of Point No. 8 of the Constitutional Court &amp; apos;s Decision no. U-I-246/02-28 (Zakon o izvršitvi 8. toèke odloèbe Ustavnega sodišèa Republike Slovenije št. U-I-246/02-28), also known as the &amp; quot;Technical Act &amp; quot;.
Parlament je 25. novembra 2003 sprejel Zakon o izvršitvi 8. točke odločbe Ustavnega sodišča Republike Slovenije št. U-I-246/02-28, znan tudi pod imenom &amp; quot;tehnični zakon &amp; quot;.
Furthermore, in an individual case (Up-211/04) brought by one of the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot;, claiming that his absence from Slovenia was due to the state of war, on 2 March 2006 the Constitutional Court set aside the judgments of the Supreme Court dismissing the claimant &amp; apos;s request for a permanent residence permit under the Legal Status Act, and remitted the case to the Administrative Court.
Poleg tega je ustavno sodišče 2. marca 2006 v posamičnem primeru (Up-211/04), ki ga je predložil eden od izbrisanih, ki je trdil, da je bil odsoten iz Slovenije zaradi vojnega stanja, razveljavilo sodbe vrhovnega sodišča, s katerimi je bila zavrnjena njegova prošnja za dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje po ZUSDDD, in vrnilo zadevo upravnemu sodišču.
It instructed the latter to make an appropriate assessment of the legal condition of &amp; quot;actually residing on the territory of the Republic of Slovenia &amp; quot; from 23 December 1990 onwards and of the reasons for the claimant &amp; apos;s absence from Slovenia.
Naročilo je upravnemu sodišču, naj ustrezno presodi pogoj &amp; quot;dejanskega življenja na ozemlju Republike Slovenije &amp; quot; od 23. decembra 1990 in razloge za pritožnikovo odsotnost iz Slovenije.
In 2004 the Ministry issued 4,034 retroactive permits to the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot;, solely on the basis of the above-mentioned Constitutional Court decision.
Leta 2004 je ministrstvo izbrisanim izdalo 4034 dovoljenj z učinkom za nazaj zgolj na podlagi omenjene odločbe ustavnega sodišča.
Following the parliamentary elections held on 21 September 2008, a new government was appointed in November 2008. The regulation of the status of the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; in compliance with the Constitutional Court &amp; apos;s decisions was established as one of its priorities.
Po državnozborskih volitvah 21. septembra 2008 je bila novembra 2008 imenovana nova vlada. Kot enega svojih prednostnih ciljev je navedla ureditev statusa izbrisanih v skladu z odločbami ustavnega sodišča.
Further to an upgrading of the IT system, the Ministry collected new data on the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; and issued a report stating that on 24 January 2009 the number of the people removed from the Register amounted to 25,671, of whom 7,899 had subsequently acquired Slovenian citizenship; 7,313 of them were still alive.
Po posodobitvi informacijskega sistema je ministrstvo zbralo nove podatke o izbrisanih in izdalo poročilo, v katerem je navedlo, da je bilo 24. januarja 2009 25.671 oseb izbrisanih iz registra; od teh je 7899 pozneje pridobilo slovensko državljanstvo; 7313 je bilo še vedno živih.
13,426 &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; persons did not have a regulated status in Slovenia on that date and their current residence was unknown.
Preostalih 13.426 izbrisanih ta dan ni imelo urejenega statusa v Sloveniji in njihovo takratno prebivališče je bilo neznano.
In 2009 the Ministry resumed the process of issuing, ex proprio motu, decisions establishing permanent residence in Slovenia ex tunc with effect from 26 February 1992 under point no. 8 of the operative part of the Constitutional Court &amp; apos;s decision of 2003 (see paragraph 60 above) to those who were already in possession of ex nunc permits.
Leta 2009 je ministrstvo iz lastnega nagiba (ex proprio motu) ponovno začelo izdajati odločbe o ugotovitvi stalnega prebivanja v Sloveniji z učinkom za nazaj (ex tunc) z veljavnostjo od 26. februarja 1992 po 8. točki izreka odločbe ustavnega sodišča iz leta 2003 (glej 60. odstavek) tistim osebam, ki so že imele dovoljenja z učinkom za naprej (ex nunc).
Subsequently, the Ministry prepared amendments and supplements to the Legal Status Act ( &amp; quot;the amended Legal Status Act &amp; quot;), regulating the incompatibilities between the Legal Status Act and the Constitution, following the Constitutional Court &amp; apos;s decision of 3 April 2003, in particular in respect of those who had been deported and those who had had to leave Slovenia because of other reasons related to the &amp; quot;erasure &amp; quot;.
Nato je ministrstvo pripravilo spremembe in dopolnitve ZUSDDD (v nadaljnjem besedilu: spremenjeni in dopolnjeni ZUSDDD), ki so urejale neskladnosti med ZUSDDD in ustavo na podlagi odločbe ustavnega sodišča z dne 3. aprila 2003, zlasti glede tistih oseb, ki so bile prisilno izgnane, in tistih, ki so morale zapustiti Slovenijo zaradi drugih razlogov, povezanih z izbrisom.
On 12 March 2010 thirty-one parliamentarians requested that a referendum be held on the amended Legal Status Act, inter alia because it did not regulate the question of compensation for the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot;; as a result, its entry into force was postponed.
12. marca 2010 je enaintrideset poslancev zahtevalo, da se razpiše referendum o spremenjenem in dopolnjenem ZUSDDD, med drugim zato, ker ni uredil vprašanja odškodnin izbrisanim; zato je bil začetek veljavnosti zakona odložen.
The amended Act was considered to provide for a permanent solution to the status of those &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot; persons who had been unable to regularise their status, including that of their children, and for the issuing of special retroactive decisions to those of them who had been granted Slovenian citizenship, without the requirement of having a prior permanent residence permit.
Menilo je, da spremenjeni in dopolnjeni zakon zagotavlja trajno rešitev za status tistih izbrisanih, ki niso mogli urediti svojega statusa, vključno z njihovimi otroki, ter za izdajanje posebnih odločb z učinkom za nazaj tistim, ki jim je bilo podeljeno slovensko državljanstvo, ne da bi bilo zahtevano predhodno dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje.
In paragraph 43 of its decision the Constitutional Court held that, by passing the Act in question, which provided for the retroactivity of permanent residence status, the legislature had introduced moral satisfaction as a particular form of reparation for the &amp; quot;erased &amp; quot;.
Ustavno sodišče je v 43. točki odločbe trdilo, da je zakonodajalec s sprejetjem spremenjenega in dopolnjenega ZUSDDD, ki predvideva veljavnost statusa stalnega prebivalca za nazaj, vzpostavil moralno zadoščenje kot posebno obliko poravnave škode izbrisanim.
If damage was caused to individuals as a result of their &amp; quot;erasure &amp; quot;, the question of possible State liability could arise on the basis of Article 26 of the Constitution if other conditions provided for by that Article and the relevant statutory conditions were met.
Če je bila posameznikom zaradi izbrisa povzročena škoda, bi se lahko zastavilo vprašanje o morebitni odškodninski odgovornosti države na podlagi 26. člena ustave, če bi bili izpolnjeni drugi v tem členu predvideni pogoji in ustrezni zakonski pogoji.
It was legitimate for the legislature to pass specific legislation limiting the State &amp; apos;s liability, as had been done, for instance, in respect of the victims of the Second World War.
Zakonodajalec lahko zakonito sprejme posebno zakonodajo o omejitvi odgovornosti države, kakor je bilo to na primer storjeno za žrtve druge svetovne vojne.