natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This paragraph also draws upon Article 1(2) of the European Social Charter, which was signed on 18 October 1961 and has been ratified by all the Member States, and on point 4 of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers of 9 December 1989. The expression &amp; quot;working conditions &amp; quot; is to be understood in the sense of Article III-213 of the Constitution.
Ta odstavek se prav tako sklicuje na drugi odstavek člena 1 Evropske socialne listine, ki je bila podpisana 18. oktobra 1961 in so jo ratificirale vse države članice, ter na točko 4 Listine Skupnosti o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev z dne 9. decembra 1989. Izraz »delovni pogoji« je treba razumeti v smislu III-213. člena Ustave.
&amp; quot;Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.
»Vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba ima pravico do spoštovanja svojega premoženja.
The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties. &amp; quot;
Ta določba pa nikakor ne omejuje pravice držav, da uveljavijo zakone, za katere menijo, da so potrebni za nadzor nad uporabo premoženja v skladu s splošnim interesom ali za zagotovitev plačila davkov, drugih prispevkov ali denarnih kazni.«
Article III-124 confers power on the Union to adopt legislative acts, including harmonisation of the Member States &amp; apos; laws and regulations, to combat certain forms of discrimination, listed exhaustively in that Article.
III-124. člen Uniji dodeljuje pristojnost, da sprejema zakonodajne akte, vključno z usklajevanjem zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic za boj proti nekaterim oblikam diskriminacije, ki so izčrpno naštete v tem členu.
Such legislation may cover action of Member State authorities (as well as relations between private individuals) in any area within the limits of the Union &amp; apos;s powers.
Taka zakonodaja lahko vključuje dejavnosti organov držav članic (kot tudi odnose med posamezniki) na vseh področjih v okviru pristojnosti Unije.
See also Directive 2001/23/EC on the safeguarding of employees &amp; apos; rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, and Directive 80/987/EEC on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, as amended by Directive 2002/74/EC.
Glej tudi Direktivo 2001/23/ES v zvezi z ohranjanjem pravic delavcev v primeru prenosa podjetij (UL L 82, 22. 3. 2001, str. 16) in Direktivo 80/987/EGS o varstvu delavcev v primeru plačilne nesposobnosti njihovega delodajalca
The expression &amp; quot;working conditions &amp; quot; must be understood in the sense of Article III-213 of the Constitution.
Izraz »delovni pogoji« je treba razumeti v smislu III-213. člena.
&amp; quot;Maternity &amp; quot; covers the period from conception to weaning.
»Materinstvo« je obdobje od spočetja do prenehanja dojenja.
&amp; quot;Maternity &amp; quot; must be understood in the same sense as in the preceding Article.
»Materinstvo« je treba razumeti enako kot v prejšnjem členu.
The European Convention has considered the Union &amp; apos;s system of judicial review including the rules on admissibility, and confirmed them while amending them as to certain aspects, as reflected in Articles III-353 to III-381 of the Constitution, and in particular in Article III-365(4).
Evropska konvencija je preučila sistem sodnega nadzora Unije, vključno s pravili o dopustnosti, ter ga potrdila in hkrati spremenila nekatere njegove vidike, kot je prikazano v III-353. do III-381. členu Ustave, in zlasti v četrtem odstavku III-365. člena Ustave.
&amp; quot;In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
»Vsakdo ima pravico, da o njegovih civilnih pravicah in obveznostih ali o kakršnihkoli kazenskih obtožbah zoper njega pravično in javno ter v razumnem roku odloča neodvisno in nepristransko z zakonom ustanovljeno sodišče.
Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. &amp; quot;
Sodba mora biti izrečena javno, toda tisk in javnost sta lahko izločena iz sojenja deloma ali v celoti v interesu morale, javnega reda ali državne varnosti, če to v demokratični družbi zahtevajo koristi mladoletnikov ali varovanje zasebnega življenja strank, pa tudi tedaj, kadar bi po mnenju sodišča zaradi posebnih okoliščin javnost sojenja škodovala interesom pravičnosti.«
That is one of the consequences of the fact that the Union is a community based on the rule of law as stated by the Court in Case 294/83, &amp; quot;Les Verts &amp; quot; v. European Parliament (judgment of 23 April 1986, [1988] ECR 1339).
To je ena od posledic dejstva, da je Unija skupnost, ki temelji na načelih pravne države, kot navaja Sodišče v zadevi 294/83, »Les Verts« proti Evropskemu parlamentu (sodba z dne 23. aprila 1986, [1988] PSES 1339).
(e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court. &amp; quot;
e) da ima brezplačno pomoč tolmača, če ne razume ali ne govori jezika, ki se uporablja pred sodiščem.«
This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations. &amp; quot;
Ta člen ni ovira za sojenje in kaznovanje oseb za kako storitev ali opustitev, ki je bila v času, ko je bila storjena, kazniva po splošnih pravnih načelih, ki jih priznavajo civilizirani narodi.«
In paragraph 2, the reference to &amp; quot;civilised &amp; quot; nations has been deleted; this does not change the meaning of this paragraph, which refers to crimes against humanity in particular.
V drugem odstavku se je črtala beseda »civilizirani«; to ne spreminja pomena tega odstavka, ki se nanaša predvsem na zločine zoper človeštvo.
No derogation from this Article shall be made under Article 15 of the Convention. &amp; quot;
Določila tega člena se ne smejo derogirati s sklicevanjem na 15. člen Konvencije.«
The &amp; quot;non bis in idem &amp; quot; rule applies in Union law (see, among the many precedents, the judgment of 5 May 1966, Cases 18/65 and 35/65, Gutmann v. Commission [1966] ECR 103 and a recent case, the decision of the Court of First Instance of 20 April 1999, Joined Cases T-305/94 and others, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV v. Commission [1999] ECR II-931).
Pravilo »non bis in idem« se uporablja v pravu Unije (glej med obsežno sodno prakso sodbo z dne 5. maja 1966, zadevi 18/65 in 35/65, Gutmann proti Komisiji [1966] PSES 103 in za novejšo zadevo sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. aprila 1999, združene zadeve T-305/94 in druge, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV proti Komisiji [1999] PSES II-931).
In accordance with Article 50, the &amp; quot;non bis in idem &amp; quot; rule applies not only within the jurisdiction of one State but also between the jurisdictions of several Member States.
V skladu s členom 50 se pravilo »non bis in idem« ne uporablja zgolj v okviru pristojnosti ene države, temveč tudi v okviru pristojnosti več držav članic.
That corresponds to the acquis in Union law; see Articles 54 to 58 of the Schengen Convention and the judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 February 2003, C-187/01 Gözütok (not yet published), Article 7 of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities &amp; apos; Financial Interests and Article 10 of the Convention on the fight against corruption.
To ustreza pravnemu redu v pravu Unije; glej člene 54 do 58 Schengenske konvencije in sodbo Sodišča z dne 11. februarja 2003, C-187/01 Gözütok, člen 7 Konvencije o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in člen 10 Konvencije o boju proti korupciji.
The very limited exceptions in those Conventions permitting the Member States to derogate from the &amp; quot;non bis in idem &amp; quot; rule are covered by the horizontal clause in Article 52(1) of the Charter concerning limitations.
Zelo omejene izjeme v navedenih konvencijah, ki državam članicam omogočajo izjemo od pravila »non bis in idem«, so določene s horizontalno klavzulo iz prvega odstavka člena 52 Listine glede omejitev.
The term &amp; quot;institutions &amp; quot; is enshrined in Part I of the Constitution.
Izraz »institucije« je utemeljen v I. delu Ustave.
The expression &amp; quot;bodies, offices and agencies &amp; quot; is commonly used in the Constitution to refer to all the authorities set up by the Constitution or by secondary legislation (see, e.g., Articles I-50 or I-51 of the Constitution).
V Ustavi se izraz »organi, uradi in agencije« navadno uporablja za označevanje vseh teles, ustanovljenih z Ustavo ali sekundarno zakonodajo (glej npr. I-50. ali I-51. člen Ustave).
&amp; quot;In addition, it should be remembered that the requirements flowing from the protection of fundamental rights in the Community legal order are also binding on Member States when they implement Community rules... &amp; quot;
»Treba je tudi upoštevati, da so zahteve, ki izhajajo iz varstva temeljnih pravic v pravnem redu Skupnosti, zavezujoče tudi za države članice pri njihovem izvajanju pravil Skupnosti...«
Consequently, an obligation, pursuant to the second sentence of paragraph 1, for the Union &amp; apos;s institutions to promote principles laid down in the Charter, may arise only within the limits of these same powers.
Zato obveznost institucij Unije, da v skladu z drugim stavkom prvega odstavka spodbujajo načela, podana v Listini, lahko obstaja le v mejah teh pristojnosti.
In accordance with this rule, it goes without saying that the incorporation of the Charter into the Constitution cannot be understood as extending by itself the range of Member State action considered to be &amp; quot;implementation of Union law &amp; quot; (within the meaning of paragraph 1 and the above-mentioned case law).
V skladu s tem pravilom je samoumevno, da vključitev Listine v Ustavo ne more sama po sebi pomeniti širitve obsega ukrepov držav članic, ki štejejo kot »izvajanje prava Unije« (v smislu prvega odstavka in zgoraj navedene sodne prakse).
it is well established in the case law of the Court that restrictions may be imposed on the exercise of fundamental rights, in particular in the context of a common organisation of the market, provided that those restrictions in fact correspond to objectives of general interest pursued by the Community and do not constitute, with regard to the aim pursued, disproportionate and unreasonable interference undermining the very substance of those rights &amp; quot; (judgment of 13 April 2000, Case C-292/97, paragraph 45 of the grounds).
»...skladno z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča je mogoče uvesti omejitve pri uresničevanju temeljnih pravic, zlasti v okviru skupne ureditve trga, pod pogojem, da navedene omejitve dejansko ustrezajo ciljem splošnega interesa, za katere se zavzema Skupnost, in da ne povzročajo glede na želeni cilj čezmernega in neutemeljenega motenja, ki bi ogrožalo samo bistvo navedenih pravic« (sodba z dne 13. aprila 2000, zadeva C-292/97, odstavek 45 obrazložitve).
? Article 11 corresponds to Article 10 of the ECHR without prejudice to any restrictions which Union law may impose on Member States &amp; apos; right to introduce the licensing arrangements referred to in the third sentence of Article 10(1) of the ECHR
? člen 11 ustreza 10. členu EKČP ne glede na omejitve, ki jih pravo Unije lahko naloži državam članicam glede pravice do uvedbe dogovora o izdaji dovoljenj iz tretjega stavka prvega odstavka 10. člena EKČP;
The rule of interpretation contained in paragraph 4 has been based on the wording of Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union (cf. now the wording of Article I-9(3) of the Constitution) and takes due account of the approach to common constitutional traditions followed by the Court of Justice (e.g., judgment of 13 December 1979, Case 44/79 Hauer [1979] ECR 3727; judgment of 18 May 1982, Case 155/79, AM &amp; amp;S, [1982] ECR 1575).
Pravilo o razlagi, vsebovano v četrtem odstavku, temelji na besedilu člena 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (prim. sedaj besedilo tretjega odstavka I-9. člena Ustave) in ustrezno upošteva pristop do skupnih ustavnih tradicij, ki mu sledi Sodišče (npr. sodba z dne 13. decembra 1979, zadeva 44/79 Hauer [1979] PSES 3727; sodba z dne 18. maja 1982, zadeva 155/79, AM &amp; amp;S, [1982] PSES 1575).
Under that rule, rather than following a rigid approach of &amp; quot;a lowest common denominator &amp; quot;, the Charter rights concerned should be interpreted in a way offering a high standard of protection which is adequate for the law of the Union and in harmony with the common constitutional traditions.
Po tem pravilu je treba zadevne pravice iz Listine namesto s strogim pristopom »najnižjega skupnega imenovalca« razlagati na način, ki nudi visoko raven varstva, ustrezno pravu Unije in skladno s skupnimi ustavnimi tradicijami.
Paragraph 5 clarifies the distinction between &amp; quot;rights &amp; quot; and &amp; quot;principles &amp; quot; set out in the Charter.
Peti odstavek pojasnjuje razlikovanje v okviru Listine med »pravicami« in »načeli«.
They do not however give rise to direct claims for positive action by the Union &amp; apos;s institutions or Member States authorities.
Vendar niso razlog za neposredne zahteve po pozitivnem ukrepanju institucij Unije ali organov držav članic.
This is consistent both with case law of the Court of Justice (Cf. notably case law on the &amp; quot;precautionary principle &amp; quot; in Article 174 (2) TEC (replaced by Article III-233 of the Constitution): judgment of the CFI of 11 September 2002, T-13/99, Pfizer vs. Council, with numerous references to earlier case law; and a series of judgments on Article 33 (ex-39) on the principles of agricultural law, e.g. judgment of the Court of Justice C-265/85, Van den Berg, 1987 ECR 1155:
To je v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča (prim. zlasti sodno prakso v zvezi s »previdnostnim načelom« iz člena 174(2) PES (se nadomesti s III-233. členom Ustave), sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 11. septembra 2002, T-13/99, Pfizer proti Svetu, s številnimi sklicevanji na prejšnjo sodno prakso, in vrsto sodb v zvezi s členom 33 Pogodbe o ES glede načel kmetijskega prava, npr. sodba Sodišča C-265/85, Van den Berg, 1987 PSES 1155:
scrutiny of the principle of market stabilisation and of reasonable expectations) and with the approach of the Member States &amp; apos; constitutional systems to &amp; quot;principles &amp; quot; particularly in the field of social law.
ocena načela stabilizacije trga in legitimnih pričakovanj) in s pristopom v ustavnih sistemih držav članic do »načel«, zlasti na področju socialnega prava.
&amp; quot;Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention. &amp; quot;
»Nobene določbe v tej Konvenciji ni mogoče razlagati tako, kot da vsebuje za katerokoli državo, skupino ali posameznika pravico do kakršenkoli dejavnosti ali dejanja, ki je usmerjeno h kršenju katerihkoli pravic ali svoboščin, ki so tu določene, ali k njihovemu omejevanju v večjem obsegu, kot je določeno v tej Konvenciji.«
The terms &amp; quot;such measures are required in order to compensate for the economic disadvantages caused by the division of Germany to the economy of certain areas of the Federal Republic affected by that division &amp; quot; shall be interpreted in accordance with the existing case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and of the Court of First Instance.
Izraz »ukrepi potrebni za nadomestilo gospodarske škode, ki jo delitev Nemčije povzročila v gospodarstvu nekaterih območij Zvezne republike, prizadetih zaradi te delitve« se razlaga v skladu z obstoječo sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Sodišča prve stopnje..
The Conference agrees that the Union &amp; apos;s action in the area of research and technological development will pay due respect to the fundamental orientations and choices of the research policies of the Member States.
Konferenca se strinja, da bo delovanje Unije na področju raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja upoštevalo temeljne usmeritve in izbore raziskovalnih politik držav članic.
The Conference considers that the possibility of producing translations of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe in the languages mentioned in Article IV-448(2) contributes to fulfilling the objective of respecting the Union &amp; apos;s rich cultural and linguistic diversity as set forth in the fourth subparagraph of Article I-3(3) of that Treaty.
Konferenca meni, da možnost uradnega prevoda Pogodbe v jezikih iz drugega odstavka IV-448. člena Pogodbe, prispeva k izpolnjevanju cilja spoštovanja bogate kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti Unije, kot je določeno v tretjem odstavku I-3. člena Ustave.
Taking account of the provisions concerning the Sovereign Base Areas set out in the Treaty concerning the Establishment of the Republic of Cyprus (hereinafter referred to as the &amp; quot;Treaty of Establishment &amp; quot;) and the associated Exchanges of Notes dated 16 August 1960,
ob upoštevanju določb o suverenih conah iz Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Republike Ciper (v nadaljnjem besedilu »Pogodba o ustanovitvi«) in pripadajoče izmenjave not z dne 16. avgusta 1960,
Declaring the Union &amp; apos;s willingness to continue to provide adequate additional assistance to Lithuania &amp; apos;s decommissioning effort also after Lithuania &amp; apos;s accession to the Union for the period until 2006 and beyond and noting that Lithuania, bearing in mind this expression of Union solidarity, has committed to close Unit 1 of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant before 2005 and Unit 2 by 2009;
ob izjavi, da je Unija pripravljena zagotavljati zadostno dodatno pomoč litovskim naporom pri razgradnji tudi po pristopu Litve k Evropski uniji, v obdobju do 2006 in tudi dlje, in ob upoštevanju, da se je Litva upoštevajoč ta izraz solidarnosti Unije zavezala, da bo zaprla Enoto 1 Jedrske elektrarne Ignalina pred letom 2005 in Enoto 2 do leta 2009,
Considering the particular situation of the Kaliningrad region of the Russian Federation in the context of the Union &amp; apos;s enlargement;
ob upoštevanju posebne situacije območja Ruske federacije Kaliningrad v okviru širitve Unije,
RECOGNISE that in the event of Articles 109h and 109i being applied it will be necessary to take care that any measures required of the Italian Government do not prejudice the completion of its programme for economic expansion and for raising the standard of living of the population. &amp; quot;
PRIZNAVAJO, da je zlasti pri uporabi členov 109 H in 109 I treba zagotoviti, da ukrepi, ki se jih zahteva od italijanske vlade, ne ogrozijo izvajanja njenega programa gospodarskega razvoja in zviševanja življenjske ravni prebivalstva.«
Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the definition of the term &amp; quot;nationals &amp; quot;
Izjava Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske o opredelitvi izraza »državljani«
In respect of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in any of the acts deriving from those Treaties or continued in force by those Treaties, the United Kingdom reiterates the Declaration it made on 31 December 1982 on the definition of the term &amp; quot;nationals &amp; quot; with the exception that the reference to &amp; quot;British Dependent Territories Citizens &amp; quot; shall be read as meaning &amp; quot;British overseas territories citizens &amp; quot;. Declaration by the PlaceType placeKingdom of PlaceNameSpain on the definition of the term &amp; quot;nationals &amp; quot;
Združeno kraljestvo v zvezi s Pogodbo o Ustavi za Evropo ali Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo ali s katerim koli aktom, ki izhaja iz navedenih pogodb ali v skladu s temi pogodbami ostaja v veljavi, ponovno poudarja izjavo z dne 31. decembra 1982 o opredelitvi izraza »državljani«, izraz »državljani britanskih odvisnih ozemelj« se vedno razume kot »državljani britanskih čezmorskih ozemelj«.
(a) &amp; quot;Convention &amp; quot; means the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982;
a) »konvencija« pomeni Konvencijo Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu z dne 10. decembra 1982;
(b) &amp; quot;Statute &amp; quot; means the Statute of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in annex VI to the Convention;
b) »statut« pomeni Statut Mednarodnega sodišča za pomorsko mednarodno pravo iz Priloge VI h konvenciji;
(c) &amp; quot;States Parties &amp; quot; means States Parties to this Agreement;
c) »države pogodbenice« pomenijo države podpisnice tega sporazuma;
(d) &amp; quot;Tribunal &amp; quot; means the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea;
d) »sodišče« pomeni Mednarodno sodišče za pomorsko mednarodno pravo;
(e) &amp; quot;Member of the Tribunal &amp; quot; means an elected member of the Tribunal or a person chosen under article 17 of the Statute for the purpose of a particular case;
e) »član sodišča« pomeni izvoljenega člana sodišča ali osebo, izbrano po 17. členu statuta za določen primer;
(f) &amp; quot;Registrar &amp; quot; means the Registrar of the Tribunal and includes any official of the Tribunal acting as Registrar;
f) »tajnik« pomeni tajnika sodišča in vključuje katerega koli uradnika sodišča, ki deluje kot tajnik;
(g) &amp; quot;officials of the Tribunal &amp; quot; means the Registrar and other members of the staff of the Registry;
g) »uradniki sodišča« pomenijo tajnika in druge člane osebja sodne pisarne;
(h) &amp; quot;Vienna Convention &amp; quot; means the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961.
h) »Dunajska konvencija« pomeni Dunajsko konvencijo o diplomatskih odnosih z dne 18. aprila 1961.
AGREEMENT between the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Poland, Romania, the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Slovenia promoting cooperation in the field of higher education within the framework of the Central European Exchange Programme for University Studies ( &amp; quot;CEEPUS II &amp; quot;)
SPORAZUM med Republiko Avstrijo, Republiko Bolgarijo, Republiko Hrvaško, Češko republiko, Republiko Madžarsko, Republiko Poljsko, Romunijo, Slovaško republiko in Republiko Slovenijo o spodbujanju sodelovanja visokega šolstva v srednjeevropskem programu o meduniverzitetni izmenjavi (CEEPUS II)
(1) For the purpose of the present Agreement, the terms &amp; quot;University &amp; quot; applies to an establishment providing higher education and being recognized by the competent authority of a Contracting Party as belonging to its system of higher education.
(1) V tem sporazumu izraz »univerza« pomeni visokošolski zavod, ki omogoča visokošolski študij in jo pristojni organ pogodbenice priznava za del svojega visokošolskega sistema.
(2) For the purpose of the present Agreement, the term &amp; quot;academic year &amp; quot; applies to the period of time from September 1st until August 31st of the following year.
(2) V tem sporazumu izraz »študijsko leto« pomeni obdobje od 1. septembra do 31. avgusta naslednjega leta.