natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In a flooding in 2005, a lot of information Ń and in particular electronic data Ń was sent immediately after the disaster occurred and before the official application was submitted. 
Pri poplavah v letu 2005 je bilo veliko informacij – zlasti podatkov v elektronski obliki – poslanih takoj po nesreči in pred predložitvijo uradne vloge.
The result was that the Commission requested further information 1,6 months before it received the application and the assessment stage was shorter than the average. 
Posledično je Komisija zahtevala dodatne informacije 1,6 meseca, preden je prejela vlogo, zato je bilo trajanje faze ocenjevanja krajše od povprečja.
In a forest fire case in 2003, the authorities sent the Commission the information it had requested the next day. 
V primeru gozdnega požara leta 2003 so pristojni organi že naslednji dan poslali Komisiji informacije, ki jih je zahtevala.
This resulted in an overall assessment time of 1,5 months only. 
Zato je ocenjevanje skupaj trajalo samo 1,5 meseca.
At the other extreme, in a case of 2003, the assessment took 12,5 months. 
Druga skrajnost je primer iz leta 2003, pri katerem je ocenjevanje trajalo 12,5 meseca.
The reason was that the national authorities sent a huge but incomplete package of supporting documentation in their national language. 
Do tega je prišlo, ker so nacionalni organi poslali ogromen, vendar nepopoln sklop dokazil v svojem nacionalnem jeziku.
The Court examined how the applicants view the duration of the assessment phase (see Table 4). 
Sodišče je preučilo, kako na trajanje faze ocenjevanja gledajo prosilci (glej tabelo 4).
According to the survey data, more than half of the successful applicants and also two thirds of the unsuccessful applicants found the CommissionŐs time spent for the assessment of their application to be reasonable. 
Po podatkih, pridobljenih z raziskovalno anketo, je več kot polovica uspešnih prosilcev in tudi dve tretjini neuspešnih prosilcev menilo, da je Komisija njihovo vlogo ocenila v razumnem roku.
The successful applicants are those whose applications were approved, the unsuccessful are those whose applications were rejected. 
Uspešni prosilci so tisti, katerih vloge so bile odobrene, neuspešni pa tisti, katerih vloge so bile zavrnjene.
Table 4 Percentage of applicants considering the assessment phase as reasonable, too long or having some other opinion Applicants 15. 
Tabela 4 Delež v odstotkih prosilcev, ki menijo, da je trajanje faze ocenjevanja razumno, predolgo ali pa imajo drugačno mnenje 15.
Furthermore, Table 5 shows the average duration of the assessment phase considered by the applicants as reasonable and the average duration of the assessment phase considered by the applicants as too long. 
Nadalje je v tabeli 5 prikazano povprečno trajanje faze ocenjevanja, ki ga prosilci vidijo kot razumnega, in povprečno trajanje faze ocenjevanja, ki ga prosilci štejejo za predolgo.
Interestingly enough, the unsuccessful applicants appear to be more ÔpatientŐ than the successful applicants. 
Zanimivo je, da se neuspešni prosilci zdijo „potrpežljivejši“ od uspešnih prosilcev.
It is worth remarking that only one unsuccessful applicant considered the time taken by the Commission as Ôtoo longŐ. 
Dodati je treba tudi, da se je čas, ki ga je potrebovala Komisija, samo enemu neuspešnemu prosilcu zdel „predolg“.
Table 5 Relationship between the success of the application, the duration of the assessment phase and the applicantsŐ opinion Approved applications Rejected applications Average time for those applicants who considered the time spent as reasonable Source: Average time for those applicants who considered the time spent as too long Average time for those applicants who considered the time spent as reasonable Average time for those applicants who considered the time spent as too long 171 days Survey data obtained from the applicants by the Court. 
Tabela 5 Razmerje med uspehom vloge, trajanjem faze ocenjevanja in mnenjem prosilcev Povprečno trajanje pri tistih prosilcih, ki se jim je porabljeni čas zdel razumen Vir: Odobrene vloge Zavrnjene vloge Povprečno trajanje pri tistih prosilcih, ki se jim je porabljeni čas zdel predolg 101 dan Podatki, ki jih je Sodišče pridobilo z raziskovalno anketo med prosilci.
181 days 101 days 129 days Opinion on the duration of the assessment phase More than two months on average to make the financial resources available in the EU budget. 16. 
171 dni 129 dni 181 dni Povprečno trajanje pri tistih prosilcih, ki se jim je porabljeni čas zdel razumen Povprečno trajanje pri tistih prosilcih, ki se jim je porabljeni čas zdel predolg Mnenje o trajanju faze ocenjevanja Prosilci Povprečno mineta več kot dva meseca, preden so dana na razpolago finančna sredstva iz proračuna EU 16.
Following the decision in principle by the Commission, the budget phase commences. 
Po načelni odločitvi Komisije se začne proračunska faza.
The budget line for EUSF is only a token entry. 
Proračunska vrstica za SSEU je samo zaznamek.
The Commission prepares a Ôbudgetary requestŐ which is presented to the budgetary authority (Council and Parliament). 
Komisija pripravi „zahtevek za proračunska sredstva“, ki se predloži proračunskima organoma (Svet in Parlament).
This budgetary amending procedure takes more than two months on average but can increase to four months during holiday periods (see Textbox 2). 
Ta postopek spreminjanja proračuna povprečno traja več kot dva meseca, vendar se lahko v času praznikov ali dopustov zavleče tudi na štiri mesece (glej okvir 2).
Textbox 2 Passing the budgetary amending procedure For two flooding applications in 2005, the decision in principle was taken in December 2005 but the budget amendment was only approved in April 2006, four months later. 
Okvir 2 Izvedba postopka spreminjanja proračuna Za dve vlogi v zvezi s poplavami v letu 2005 je bila načelna odločitev sprejeta decembra 2005, sprememba proračuna pa je bila odobrena šele aprila 2006, štiri mesece pozneje.
For a flooding case in 2004, the decision in principle was taken in June 2005 and the budget amendment was only approved in September 2005, three months later. 
Za primer vloge v zvezi s poplavami leta 2004 je bila načelna odločitev sprejeta junija 2005, sprememba proračuna pa je bila odobrena šele septembra 2005, tri mesece pozneje.
Three months on average to get all documents signed. 17. 
Do podpisa vseh dokumentov povprečno pretečejo trije meseci 17.
Once the necessary financial resources have been made available in the budget, the Commission adopts a grant decision and concludes an agreement with the applicant. 
Ko so v proračunu dana na razpolago potrebna finančna sredstva, Komisija sprejme odločbo o nepovratnih sredstvih in sklene sporazum s prosilcem.
This agreement sets out the type and location of operations to be financed by the Fund. 
V tem sporazumu se določita vrsta in kraj dejavnosti, ki bodo financirane iz sklada.
18.6.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 153/7 months. 
18.6.2008 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 153/7 so včasih tako preprosti kot identifikacijska številka bančnega računa za plačilo.
The method by which documents are sent to the Commission can also cause delay. 
Tudi metoda, po kateri se dokumenti pošiljajo Komisiji, lahko povzroči zamudo.
For instance some applicants who returned the signed grant agreement by diplomatic mail to their permanent representation, who then forwarded it to the Commission found that this in fact was slower than direct post mail. 
Na primer, nekateri prosilci, ki so podpisan sporazum o nepovratnih sredstvih z diplomatsko pošto poslali svojemu stalnemu predstavništvu, to pa nato Komisiji, so ugotovili, da je bilo to dejansko počasneje, kot če bi sporazum poslali neposredno po pošti.
The sum of the average time for the budget phase and the average time for the grant decision phase represents almost half of the average time from the date of disaster to the date of obtaining aid from the Fund. 
Seštevek povprečnega časa za proračunsko fazo in povprečnega časa za fazo odločanja o nepovratnih sredstvih predstavlja skorajda polovico povprečnega časa, ki preteče od datuma nesreče do datuma pridobitve pomoči iz sklada.
Hence, making the financial resources available and getting all documents signed takes as much time as assessing an application. 
Torej dajanje na razpolago razpoložljivih finančnih sredstev in podpis vseh dokumentov traja enako dolgo kot ocenjevanje vloge.
19. As shown in Table 3, the average time for the payment phase is 24 days. 
Do izplačila povprečno mine skoraj mesec dni 19. Kot prikazuje tabela 3, faza izplačila povprečno traja 24 dni.
Once the agreement has been signed by both parties, the payment itself usually takes less than one month, but it can take longer. 
Ko obe strani podpišeta sporazum, do izplačila običajno mine manj kot mesec dni, vendar lahko traja tudi dlje.
This is the case if the signed agreement is only received by the Commission at the beginning of the budget year. 
To se zgodi, če Komisija podpisan sporazum prejme šele na začetku proračunskega leta.
Then Ń due to accounting procedures at the end and beginning of the year Ń the payment will not be made before the month of March. 
V tem primeru – zaradi računovodskih postopkov na koncu in začetku leta – izplačilo ne bo izvršeno pred marcem.
What factors account for variation in time taken for obtaining aid from the Fund? 
Kateri dejavniki so odgovorni za časovne razlike pri pridobivanju pomoči iz sklada?
So far, this report has presented the average time taken for each of the five phases in the process of obtaining aid from the Fund. 
Do zdaj je bil v tem poročilu predstavljen povprečni čas, potreben za vsako od petih faz procesa pridobivanja pomoči iz sklada.
There was a wide variation around the average time. 
Pri povprečnem času so se pojavile velike razlike.
The Court sought to identify factors which might account for the variation. 
Sodišče je skušalo najti dejavnike, ki bi jih lahko pojasnili.
So the Court examined the extent to which variation is explained by the category of the disaster, the type of the disaster and the country where the disaster took place. 
Zato je preučilo, v kakšnem obsegu razlike pojasnjujejo kategorija nesreče, vrsta nesreče in država, v kateri je do nesreče prišlo.
Three categories of disaster were distinguished: major, neighbouring and regional disasters. 
Pri tem je razlikovalo med tremi kategorijami nesreč: večjimi nesrečami, nesrečami v sosedstvu in regionalnimi nesrečami.
With respect to their type, the disasters were classified as flooding, forest fire, storm, earthquake, oilspill, adverse weather, volcanic eruption and explosion. 
Glede na vrsto so bile nesreče razvrščene kot poplava, gozdni požar, neurje, potres, razlitje nafte, neugodne vremenske razmere, vulkanski izbruh in eksplozija.
No significant relationship between the category of disaster and time taken for obtaining aid from the Fund was found. 
Ugotovljeno ni bilo nikakršno pomembno razmerje med kategorijo nesreče in časom, potrebnim za pridobitev pomoči iz sklada.
The same holds for the type of disaster and the country where the disaster took place. 
Isto velja za vrsto nesreče in državo, v kateri je do nesreče prišlo.
An example of the analysis of variation in time taken for obtaining aid from the Fund is presented in Table 6. 
Primer analize razlik pri času, ki je bil potreben za pridobitev pomoči iz sklada, je predstavljen v tabeli 6.
There the relationship between the type of disaster and the duration of the application phase is shown. 
Tam je prikazano razmerje med vrsto nesreče in trajanjem faze podajanja vloge.
As can be seen, the type of disaster does not account for a significant part of the variation in time the applicant needs to present the case to the Commission. 
Kot je mogoče razbrati, vrsta nesreče ne pojasnjuje pomembnega dela razlike v času, ki ga prosilec potrebuje, da primer predloži Komisiji.
Table 6 Duration of the application phase in relation to the type of the disaster Type of disaster Number of applications Average number of days 67 58 64 72 55 79 79 68 66 Minimum number of days 12 24 61 70 55 79 79 68 12 Maximum number of days Standard deviation Flooding 19 106 17 70 17 67 2 74 2 55 0 79 0 79 0 68 0 106 15 Forest fires Storm Earthquake Oilspill Adverse weather Volcanic eruption Explosion All disasters 11 5 2 1 1 1 1 41 Source: Regional Policy DG records of applications. 
Tabela 6 Trajanje faze podajanja vloge glede na vrsto nesreče Vrsta nesreče Standar-število število dno Število Povpreč-vlog no število dni Najmanjše Največje 19 67 11 58 dni dni 12 106 17 24 70 17 odstopanje Poplava Gozdni požar Neurje Potres 27270742 5 64 61 67 2 Razlitje nafte Neugodne vremenske razmere Vulkanski izbruh Eksplozija Vse nesreče 1 55 55 55 0 1 79 79 79 0 1 79 79 79 0 1 68 68 68 0 41 66 12 106 15 Vir: Evidenca vlog v GD za regionalno politiko.
22. mobilise funds depends mainly on: (a) the administrative rules to be applied; (b) the rapidity of the Commission, including the need for translation; (c) the promptness of the national authoritiesŐ replies; and (d) the quality of the information provided by the applicant. 
Analiza Sodišča kaže, da je čas, ki je potreben za 22. aktiviranje sredstev, odvisen predvsem od: (a) upravnih pravil, ki se uporabijo; (b) hitrosti Komisije, vključno s potrebo po prevajanju; (c) hitrosti odgovorov nacionalnih organov in (d) kakovosti informacij, ki jih zagotovi prosilec.
Can the time actually taken be regarded as showing that the Fund provided a rapid response to the applicants? 
Ali je mogoče trditi, da dejansko porabljeni čas kaže, da je sklad prosilcem zagotovil hiter odziv?
An attempt was undertaken to benchmark the rapidity of the Fund against similar funds or activities. 
Skušalo se je izmeriti, kakšna je bila uspešnost sklada v primerjavi s podobnimi skladi ali dejavnostmi.
Various other funds and activities were reviewed. 
Preučeni so bili različni drugi skladi in dejavnosti.
The closest equivalent was found to be the CommissionŐs Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid The CourtŐs analysis suggests that the time necessary to C 153/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 18.6.2008 (ECHO) Emergency Aid Fund. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da mu je C 153/8 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 18.6.2008 najbolj podobna rezerva za nujno pomoč Komisijinega Generalnega direktorata za humanitarno pomoč (ECHO).
However, despite there being similarities between the two funds, they are not sufficiently similar to provide a benchmark for the rapidity of the Solidarity Fund. 
Toda kljub podobnostim med skladoma si ta nista podobna dovolj, da bi to zagotavljalo merilo uspešnosti za Solidarnostni sklad.
The Emergency Aid Fund has a specific regulatory and procedural framework which is designed to ensure that it can provide immediate relief (e.g. an assessment phase of less than one week and a fixed budget line). 
Sklad za nujno pomoč ima specifičen uredben in postopkovni okvir, ki je zasnovan, da bi se omogočila zagotovitev takojšnje pomoči (npr. faza ocenjevanja, ki traja manj kot teden dni, in fiksna proračunska vrstica).
The Fund does not have an equivalent regulatory framework. 
Sklad nima enakovrednega uredbenega okvira.
However, when analysing the data, the Court noted that the first four applications were paid within a time span of between 100 and 150 days from the date of the disaster, on average in 131 days. 
Vendar je Sodišče pri analiziranju podatkov ugotovilo, da so bile prve štiri vloge izplačane v roku, ki je trajal med 100 in 150 dnevi od datuma nesreče, povprečno v 131 dneh.
The Commission started to deal with the first four applications before the Fund was fully set up. 
Komisija je prve štiri vloge začela obravnavati pred dokončno vzpostavitvijo sklada.
The processing time for those four applications provides a standard of comparison against which the processing time for subsequent applications can be judged. 
Čas obravnavanja teh štirih vlog zagotavlja merilo primerjave, s katerim je mogoče presojati čas obravnavanja nadaljnjih vlog.
If for an application received in 2003 or later when the Fund was fully set up the processing time, i.e. the time from the date of disaster to the date of obtaining aid from the Fund, exceeds 150 days, it can be considered as long. 
Če pri vlogi, ki je bila prejeta leta 2003 ali pozneje, ko je bil sklad že v celoti vzpostavljen, čas obravnave, torej čas od dneva nesreče do dneva pridobitve pomoči iz sklada, presega 150 dni, ga je mogoče šteti kot dolgega.
The average processing time for the 19 successful applications after the first four applications was 415 days, hence above the benchmark just defined. 
Povprečni čas obravnavanja pri 19 uspešnih vlogah po prvih štirih vlogah je znašal 415 dni, torej je bil daljši od pravkar opredeljenega merila uspešnosti.
Therefore, the Court does not consider the Fund to be rapid in providing aid in the years after 2002. 
Zato Sodišče ni mnenja, da je sklad v obdobju po letu 2002 pomoč zagotavljal hitro.
The Fund was much more rapid in dealing with the first four applications than it was in dealing with the subsequent ones. 
Sklad je prve štiri vloge obravnaval veliko hitreje kot naslednje vloge.
The four benchmark cases could help to identify how to speed up the process in new cases. 
Štirje primeri, ki so bili uporabljeni za merilo uspešnosti, bi lahko pomagali ugotoviti, kako bi bilo proces mogoče pospešiti pri novih primerih.
In these four cases: (a) the assessment lasted on average only nine days because significant documentation was provided to the Commission in the preliminary stages (before the formal application); (b) the budget phase lasted on average only eight days since the Commission sent the proposal to the Parliament on the same day that the decision in principle was taken; and (c) in the grant decision phase, a significant amount of time was saved by the signature of the agreement by both parties on the same day. 
V teh štirih primerih je: (a) ocenjevanje povprečno trajalo samo devet dni, saj je bila Komisiji obsežna dokumentacija zagotovljena že na predhodnih stopnjah (preden je bila vloga uradno podana); (b) proračunska faza povprečno trajala samo osem dni, kajti Komisija je predlog Parlamentu poslala istega dne, kot je bila sprejeta načelna odločitev; in (c) v fazi odločanja o nepovratnih sredstvih veliko časa prihranilo to, da sta obe strani sporazum podpisali istega dne.
The Court examined whether the applicants considered that the duration of the process had had an impact on the implementation of remedial mesures. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali prosilci menijo, da je trajanje procesa vplivalo na izvajanje sanacijskih ukrepov.
The survey revealed that most of the applicants considered that the duration of process had not had any effect on the implementation of remedial measures. 
Anketa je pokazala, da večina prosilcev meni, da trajanje procesa ni v nobenem pogledu vplivalo na izvajanje sanacijskih ukrepov.
This opinion is probably due to the fact that the Fund is mainly used for the reimbursement of a small part of the costs caused by the disaster (see Graph 1). 
Takšnega mnenja so verjetno zato, ker se sklad uporablja predvsem za povračilo majhnega dela stroškov, ki jih je povzročila nesreča (glej grafični prikaz 1).
Graph 1 Survey based opinion of beneficiary states on the effect of the Fund on the implementation of remedial measures 
Grafični prikaz 1 Mnenje na podlagi ankete v državah upravičenkah o učinku sklada na izvajanje sanacijskih ukrepov
18.6.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 153/9 Efficiency 27. 
18.6.2008 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 153/9 Učinkovitost 27.
The Fund is required to be efficient. 
Sklad mora biti učinkovit.
The regulation stipulates that Ôadministrative procedures should be adjusted accordingly and confined to an absolute minimumŐ without defining the concept further (1). 
Uredba določa, da „Upravni postopki morajo biti ustrezno prilagojeni in omejeni na nujno potrebni minimum“, ne da bi koncept nadalje opredelila (1).
The Court reviewed the procedures that the beneficiary states are required to comply with in respect of tendering, contracting, implementing, reporting and auditing the grant. 
Sodišče je pregledalo postopke, ki jih morajo upoštevati države upravičenke pri javnih razpisih, sklepanju pogodb in uporabi nepovratnih sredstev, pri poročanju o njih in pri njihovem revidiranju.
The Court concluded that the requirements for beneficiary states of EUSF are less cumbersome than those receiving other EU funds. 
Sodišče je prišlo do sklepa, da so zahteve za države upravičenke SSEU manj okorne kot za tiste, ki prejemajo druga sredstva EU.
It can therefore be considered that the administrative procedures have been reduced to a level which ensures that the procedures are efficient for beneficiary states. 
Zato se za upravne postopke lahko šteje, da so bili zmanjšani na raven, ki zagotavlja, da so za države upravičenke učinkoviti.
The Court reviewed the administrative procedures at the Commission to assess whether they were confined to a minimum. 
Sodišče je preučilo upravne postopke na Komisiji, da bi ocenilo, ali so bili omejeni na minimum.
The Court concluded that within the current framework of the Fund (i.e. a solidarity and not an emergency fund) all the five phases of administrative procedures were necessary and none of them was redundant. 
Prišlo je do sklepa, da je v sedanjem okviru sklada (ki je solidarnostni sklad in ne sklad za nujne primere) vseh pet faz upravnih postopkov potrebnih in da nobena ni odveč.
Despite the fact that the Commission does not have an accounting system providing data to calculate the costs of the Fund, the average direct cost of managing the Fund can be estimated to be around 0,06 % (or less than 0,1 %) of the amount granted as shown in Table 7. 
Čeprav Komisija nima računovodskega sistema, ki bi zagotavljal podatke za izračun stroškov sklada, je mogoče oceniti, da je povprečni neposredni strošek upravljanja sklada približno 0,06 % (oziroma manj kot 0,1 %) odobrenega zneska, kot prikazuje tabela 7.
Since the establishment of the Fund in 2002, two people have been permanently allocated to the task of managing the Fund services. They deal with the process from the initiation of applications up to the closure of the aid. 
Od vzpostavitve sklada leta 2002 je bila naloga upravljanja storitev sklada kot stalno delo dodeljena dvema ose-bama, ki se s procesom ukvarjata od sprožitve vlog do zaključka pomoči.
In an effort to calculate the total cost of managing the Fund by the Commission additional information was requested from both Human Resources and Audit Directorates on other personnel assigned to this task, mission frequency and cost by operational and audit units as well as other administrative, monitoring and control on-the-spot costs. Limited information was available. 
Pri prizadevanjih, da bi se izračunal celotni strošek Komisijinega upravljanja sklada, so se tako od kadrovskega kot od revizijskega direktorata zahtevale dodatne informacije o drugih uslužbencih, ki so sodelovali pri tej nalogi, pogostosti službenih potovanj ter stroških po operativnih in revizijskih enotah, pa tudi o drugih upravnih stroških ter stroških spremljanja in kontrol na kraju samem.
So in order to create a ÔbenchmarkŐ for evaluation purposes, the Court calculated an estimate for all above costs on a yearly basis. 
Zato je Sodišče, da bi sestavilo „merilo uspešnosti“ za namene vrednotenja, izračunalo oceno vseh zgornjih stroškov na letni osnovi.
This sums up to an average annual amount of EUR 170 000. 
Ta letno povprečno znaša 170 000 EUR.
In Table 7 it can be seen that the administrative costs are minimal when compared to the amount managed. 
Tabela 7 kaže, da so upravni stroški v primerjavi z upravljanim zneskom minimalni.
As an indication, in 2002, a year with only four cases to manage, the administrative costs represented 0,02 % of the aid granted. 
Za ponazoritev: leta 2002, ko je bilo treba upravljati samo štiri primere, so upravni stroški predstavljali 0,02 % odobrene pomoči.
The CourtŐs findings indicate that the Commission manage the Fund in an efficient way. 
Ugotovitve Sodišča kažejo, da Komisija učinkovito upravlja sklad.