natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reply of the Commission 37 VIII The Commission notes that the recommendations made by the Court are totally aligned with the reform of the facilities that the Commission has started at the end of 2013 and which is now enter‐ ing the approval phase. 
Odgovori Komisije 37 VIII Komisija ugotavlja, da so priporočila Sodišča popolnoma v skladu z reformo instrumentov, ki jo je Komisija začela konec leta 2013 in je zdaj v fazi odobritve.
Introduction Box 1 The IMF no longer sets loan‐by‐loan concessional‐ ity requirements, instead it sets an overall average weighted concessionality rate for all borrowings. 
Uvod Okvir 1 MDS ne določa več zahtev v zvezi s koncesivnostjo za posamezna posojila, temveč namesto tega za vsa posojila določi skupno povprečno tehtano raven koncesivnosti.
Hence this mechanistic approach will not automati‐ cally apply in the future. 
Zato se ta mehanistični pristop v pri‐ hodnosti ne bo več samodejno uporabljal.
08 The Commission is now considering modifying the ITF in order for it to be managed like the other six regional facilities having the same rules for all and therefore increasing transparency and predictability of the process for all partners and ensuring equal rights to all Member States in operational boards. 
08 Komisija zdaj razmišlja o spremembi skrbniškega sklada EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo (ITF), da bi slednjega lahko upravljala kot ostalih šest regional‐ nih instrumentov, in sicer z enakimi pravili za vse, ter s tem povečala preglednost in predvidljivost postopka za vse partnerje ter zagotovila enake pra‐ vice vsem državam članicam v operativnih odborih.
Furthermore the special funds allocated by the Member States to blending can be still managed by the EIB if they so desire. 
Poleg tega lahko Evropska investicijska banka (EIB) še vedno upravlja posebna sredstva, ki jih države članice namenijo za kombiniranje, če slednje to želijo.
12 The Commission is actively promoting the involve‐ ment of more Member States agencies in the imple‐ mentation of the facilities to ensure equal opportu‐ nities and increased exchange of best practices. 
12 Komisija za zagotavljanje enakih možnosti in izbolj‐ šanje izmenjave dobrih praks dejavno spodbuja vključevanje več agencij držav članic v izvajanje instrumentov.
Observations 16 The Commission considers that the management of the regional investment facilities has been adequate. 
Opažanja 16 Komisija meni, da je bilo upravljanje regionalnih naložbenih instrumentov ustrezno.
The Commission is responsible for the set‐up of the facilities, assessed positively in the report. 
Komisija je zadolžena za vzpostavitev instrumen‐ tov, ki so v poročilu pozitivno ocenjeni.
The Commission has devised this set‐up taking full account of the potential benefits of the facilities. 
Komisija je oblikovala to ureditev, pri čemer je v celoti upoštevala potencialne koristi instrumentov.
18 The Commission is addressing the governance of ITF and the limitation identified by the Court such as the restrictions to regional programmes (e.g. opening to national programmes, different sectors‐same voting rights, management by the Commission). 
18 Komisija obravnava upravljanje ITF in ovire, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, kot so omejitve v zvezi z regio‐ nalnimi programi (npr. vzpostavitev nacionalnih programov, različni sektorji in enake glasovalne pravice ter upravljanje s strani Komisije).
20 The identification of projects is a result of interac‐ tions and discussions between different stakehold‐ ers, including the partner countries or relevant regional organisations, the Commission and EU delegations, other donors, the financial institutions and in some cases, private sector as well as civil society representatives. 
20 Opredelitev projektov je rezultat medsebojnega sodelovanja in razprav med različnimi deležniki, vključno s partnerskimi državami ali ustreznimi regionalnimi organizacijami, delegacijami Komisije in EU, drugimi donatorji, finančnimi institucijami ter v nekaterih primerih predstavniki zasebnega sektorja in tudi civilne družbe.
The identification of projects builds on the pro‐ gramming process and on the approved policy pri‐ orities by the Commission, EEAS and partner coun‐ tries. 
Opredelitev projektov temelji na postopku načrto‐ vanja in prednostnih nalogah politike, ki jih odo‐ brijo Komisija, Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) in partnerske države.
The identification of projects further builds on the strategic discussions held within each blending facility in the context of the strategic board/steer‐ ing committee and on the discussions held on the analysis of the portfolio of approved projects and on the pipeline of projects. 
Opredelitev projektov temelji tudi na strateških razpravah v okviru vsa‐ kega kombiniranega instrumenta, in sicer v okviru strateškega/usmerjevalnega odbora, ter na raz‐ pravah o analizi portfelja odobrenih projektov ter načrtih za njihovo pripravo.
Reply of the Commission 38 Being systematically ‘at the initiative’ is not an operational objective in itself for the Commission. 
Odgovori Komisije 38 Sistematičnost „na pobudo“ sama po sebi ni operativni cilj Komisije.
The Commission rather strives to maximise effi‐ ciency and division of labour in the identification process and build on all stakeholders operationals strengths. 
Slednja si namesto tega prizadeva, da bi čim bolj povečala učinkovitost in delitev dela pri postopku opredelitve ter da bi gra‐ dila na operativnih prednostih vseh deležnikov.
This will be further streamlined by the reform of the blending in its approval phase. 
To bo nadalje poenostavljeno z reformo kombiniranja v fazi odobritve.
21 The Commission envisages reviewing the set‐up of the facilities for the Africa region. 
21 Komisija predvideva pregled ureditve instrumen‐ tov za afriško regijo.
Please see Com‐ mission’s reply to paragraph 18. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 18.
Common reply to paragraphs 22 to 31 22 Due to the flexible nature and extensive sector cov‐ erage of the facilities, the process for establishing a common indicator for value added for all the pro‐ jects is necessarily complex and almost impossible. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke od 22 do 31 22 Postopek za vzpostavitev skupnega kazalnika dodane vrednosti za vse projekte je zaradi prilagod‐ ljivosti instrumentov in njihovega širokega pokriva‐ nja sektorjev nujno zapleten in skoraj neizvedljiv.
Added value of the grant is always assessed and this assessment has been strengthened over time, in particular, in the context of the work undertaken by the EU Platform. 
Dodana vrednost nepovratnih sredstev se vedno oceni, ta ocena pa se je zlasti pri opravljenem delu v okviru platforme EU sčasoma še okrepila.
23 The Commission considers that relevant data required at different stages of approval (provisional and final) were at the disposal of the Commission. 
23 Komisija meni, da so ji bili na voljo ustrezni podatki, ki se zahtevajo v različnih fazah odobritve (začasna in končna).
Financial data at a provisional approval stage is likely to change. 
Finančni podatki iz faze začasne odobri‐ tve se bodo verjetno spremenili.
However, at a final approval stage this information is assessed. 
Vendar pa se v fazi končne odobritve te informacije ocenijo.
Additionally, certain loan conditions might change between the request and the final approval due to economic fluctuations. 
Poleg tega bi se lahko zaradi ekonomskih nihanj spremenili določeni posojilni pogoji v času med vložitvijo vloge in končno odobritvijo.
Therefore, the FIs can finalise negotiations regarding the exact conditions of their loan (interest rate, tenor years, etc.) after the Facility Board’s approval. 
Zato lahko finančne institucije zaključijo pogajanja v zvezi z natančnimi pogoji glede posojila (obrestna mera, trajanje v letih ipd.) po odobritvi s strani odbora za instrument.
It is the responsibility of the financiers to carry out the necessary calculations according to interna‐ tional standards, the principle of due diligence and agreed methods in a context of partnership and efficient division of labour. 
Ponudniki financiranja so zadolženi za izvajanje potrebnih izračunov v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi, načelom primerne skrbnosti ter dogovor‐ jenimi metodami v okviru partnerstva in učinkovite delitve dela.
In‐depth project appraisal is made by specialised teams of the FIs in accordance with the principles of due diligence. 
Specializirane skupine finančnih institucij pripra‐ vijo poglobljeno oceno projekta v skladu z načeli primerne skrbnosti.
The underlying studies are primarily carried out by the lead European Financier and are available whenever there are concerns regarding the suitabil‐ ity of the projects or whenever additional informa‐ tion is requested over and above the information contained in the application. 
Osnovne študije v prvi vrsti izvaja vodilni evrop‐ ski ponudnik financiranja in so na voljo, v kolikor obstajajo pomisleki glede primernosti projektov in v kolikor se zahtevajo dodatne informacije o tistih podatkih, ki so vsebovani v vlogi.
The Commission does not consider it necessary for financiers to provide the studies in a systematic way as this will only increase the administrative burden without real added value in most of the cases. 
Komisija meni, da ponudnikom financiranja ni treba zagotavljati študij sistematično, saj bo to v večini primerov le povečalo upravno breme brez prave dodane vrednosti.
24 The Commission underlines that EU contributions have been approved only when the necessary information underlying compliance with the main requirements set out in the Strategic Orientations has been obtained. 
24 Komisija poudarja, da so bili prispevki EU odobreni le, v kolikor so bile pridobljene potrebne informa‐ cije, ki so osnova za izpolnjevanje glavnih zahtev, določenih v strateških usmeritvah.
All the information needed for taking a decision has been produced and factored in the decision‐making process. 
Pri odločanju so bile predložene in upoštevane vse informacije, potrebne za sprejetje odločitve.
In accordance with the Financial Regula‐ tion and in the context of indirect management, the Commission can rely on the work already done by the entrusted entity, in line with the principles of due diligence and division of labour at the core of our partnership with the financial institutions. 
Komisija se lahko v skladu s finančno uredbo in v okviru posrednega upravljanja opre na delo, ki ga je že opravil subjekt, ki mu je bilo to zaupano, in sicer v skladu z načeli primerne skrbnosti in deli‐ tve dela v samem jedru partnerstva s finančnimi institucijami.
Only sufficiently mature projects are considered for approval. 
Le pri dovolj zrelih projektih se razmišlja o njihovi odobritvi.
Subsequent feasibility studies aimed at further strengthening project set‐up in line with beneficiaries’ needs can still be done, thereby enhancing the quality of the project. 
Še vedno je mogoče izvesti naknadne študije izvedljivosti za nadaljnjo krepitev ureditve projekta v skladu s potrebami upravičencev in s tem izboljšati kakovost projekta.
Reply of the Commission 39 Concessionality, debt sustainability, grant amount and economic viability are all elements at the core of the analysis undertaken by the financial institu‐ tions and the Commission. 
Odgovori Komisije 39 Koncesivnost, vzdržnost dolga, višina nepovratnih sredstev in ekonomska smiselnost so osrednji ele‐ menti analize, ki jo izvedejo ponudniki financiranja in Komisija.
26 The Commission involves the Union delegations in the review of the suitability of the grant and their advice is sought whenever relevant for the selection process. 
26 Komisija vključi delegacije Unije v pregled ustrez‐ nosti nepovratnih sredstev in se z njimi posvetuje, kadar je to pomembno za izbirni postopek.
96 % of the responding delegations stated that they are involved in the selection process. 
96 % anketiranih delegacij je navedlo, da so sodelo‐ vale pri izbirnem postopku.
The lower figure (59%) corresponds to the early identification stage as part of the overall selection process. 
Zgodnji fazi opredelitve v okviru celotnega izbirnega postopka ustreza nižji delež (59 %).
The Commission endeavours to further engage Union delegations in the preparation and follow‐up of blending operations. 
Komisija si prizadeva za nadaljnje vključevanje dele‐ gacij Unije v pripravo in spremljanje operacij kom‐ biniranja.
This is essential to assure coherence of EU activities, increase EU visibility and strengthen the EU’s weight in policy dialogue. 
To je bistveno za zagotavljanje skladnosti dejavnosti EU, izboljšanje njene prepoznavnosti in povečanje vpliva EU v političnem dialogu.
27 The start date for the calculation should not be the entry in the pipeline. 
27 Začetni datum za izračun ne bi smel biti datum vključitve v načrt za pripravo.
The pipeline is only a prelimi‐ nary indication of potential projects with a very dif‐ ferent level of development and different degrees of maturity. 
Načrt za pripravo je le predhodni pokazatelj potencialnih projektov z zelo različno stopnjo razvoja in različnimi stopnjami zrelosti.
The Commission is of the view that the most suit‐ able indicator is the time elapsed between the approval by the Technical Board and the adoption by the Operational Board at the time of the final approval. 
Komisija meni, da je najbolj primeren kazalnik čas, ki preteče med odobritvijo s strani tehničnega odbora in sprejetjem s strani operativnega odbora ob končni odobritvi.
This timeframe appears to be reasonable considering the technical complexity of blending projects and the potential number of partners involved. 
Zdi se, da je ta časovni okvir razumen glede na tehnično zapletenost projektov, ki se financirajo s kombiniranjem virov sredstev, in glede na more‐ bitno število vključenih partnerjev.
Box 2 As recorded in the minutes of the 9th ITF Executive Committee meeting, additional information on this project was provided to its members upon prior request. 
Okvir 2 Kot je navedeno v zapisniku 9. seje izvršilnega odbora ITF, so bile dodatne informacije o tem projektu pred‐ ložene njegovim članom na predhodno zahtevo.
This project was approved in 2009. 
Ta projekt je bil odobren leta 2009.
Since then, the grant application form has considerably improved in order to complement the information provided by the financial institutions. 
Od takrat je bil obrazec vloge za nepovratna sredstva, in sicer za dopolnitev informacij, ki jih predložijo finančne institucije, precej izboljšan.
25 All projects financed under the facilities are ana‐ lysed both from an economic and debt sustainabil‐ ity perspective. 
25 Vsi projekti, ki se financirajo iz instrumentov, se analizirajo tako z ekonomskega vidika kot z vidika vzdržnosti dolga.
One of the main objectives of the Commission and of the financiers is to preserve the envisaged investment and its long term sustainabil‐ ity and development impact. 
Eden od glavnih ciljev Komisije in ponudnikov financiranja je ohranitev predvidene naložbe in njene dolgoročne vzdržnosti ter vpliva na razvoj.
Still, uniform criteria, such as minimum thresholds, cannot be established for assessing economic viability. 
Enotnih meril za ocenjevanje ekonomske smisel‐ nosti, kot so najnižji pragovi, še vedno ni mogoče opredeliti.
The Working Group on the additionality of grants in the framework of blending mecha‐ nisms concluded in 2009 that the very nature of the blending operations calls for a case by case approach in terms of assessment of the amount, form and nature of support needed. 
Delovna skupina za dodano vrednost nepovratnih sredstev v okviru mehanizmov kom‐ biniranja je leta 2009 prišla do zaključka, da sama narava operacij kombiniranja zahteva posamičen pristop, in sicer v smislu ocene zneska, oblike in vrste potrebne podpore.
This approach has been confirmed in the context of the more recent work of the EU Platform for Blending in External Cooperation (EUBEC). 
Ta pristop je bil potrjen pri nedavno opravljenem delu v okviru platforme EU za kombiniranje na področju zunanjega sodelovanja (EUBEC).
The EIRR (Economic Internal Rate of Return) for projects is always assessed as part of due diligence. 
Ekonomska interna stopnja donosnosti (EIRR) projektov se vedno oceni v okviru primerne skrb‐ nosti.
Grant allocation decisions are made based on the economic and financial analysis of the projects, as well as the expected social benefits (affordability, impact on health, social situation). 
Odločitve za dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev temeljijo na ekonomski in finančni analizi projektov ter tudi na pričakovanih socialnih koristih (cenovna dostopnost, vpliv na zdravje, socialne razmere).
This review is based on the information provided in the grant application form, as well as additional information stemming from exchanges between different Commission services and its delegations, the FI and any relevant stakeholder, before, during and after the technical meetings. 
Ta pregled temelji na informacijah, navedenih v obrazcu vloge za nepovratna sredstva, in tudi na dodatnih informacijah, ki izvirajo iz izmenjave podatkov med različnimi službami Komisije in nje‐ nimi delegacijami, finančnimi institucijami in vsemi ustreznimi deležniki pred tehničnimi sestanki, med njimi in po njih.
Reply of the Commission 40 The proof that the length of the procedure is appropriate and reasonable is that there has been no evidence so far that any relevant project was not implemented due to delays in the approval pro‐ cedure. 
Odgovori Komisije 40 Da je trajanje postopka ustrezno in razumno, potr‐ juje dejstvo, da do zdaj ni bilo dokazov, da kateri koli zadevni projekt ni bil izveden zaradi zamud pri postopku odobritve.
On the contrary, the approval process has sufficient flexibility to take into account the need of partners allowing speeding up the process, if necessary. 
Nasprotno je postopek odobri‐ tve dovolj prožen, da se lahko upoštevajo potrebe partnerjev, kar omogoča pospešitev postopka, če je to primerno.
29 The Commission would like to clarify that achiev‐ ing IMF concessionality levels may be necessary, but not sufficient, in the light of project‐specific issues. 
29 Komisija želi pojasniti, da je doseganje ravni kon‐ cesivnosti MDS sicer lahko potrebno, vendar ob upoštevanju posebnih vprašanj v zvezi s posamez‐ nim projektom ne zadostuje.
Meeting the 35 % threshold can be consid‐ ered a first, necessary precondition for the financ‐ ing package to be accepted by a beneficiary under IMF restrictions. 
Doseganje 35‐odstot‐ nega praga se lahko šteje kot prvi nujni predpogoj za finančni paket, ki ga mora sprejeti upravičenec v skladu z omejitvami MDS.
However, it is not automatically sufficient condition in itself. 
Vendar ta pogoj sam po sebi ni samodejno zadosten.
Certain projects might require a higher grant element of the financing package than 35 % without putting into doubt the significant development impact they provide. 
V zvezi z nekaterimi projekti se lahko zahtevajo višja nepovratna sred‐ stva v okviru finančnega paketa od navedenih 35 %, ne da bi se podvomilo v znaten vpliv na razvoj, ki ga ti zagotavljajo.
30 The justification for grant amounts requested can vary considerably according to the specific market barrier being addressed, target group affordability, project maturity, local market conditions, availabil‐ ity of funds from other financiers and the capac‐ ity and risk appetite of the project implementers, among other conditions. 
30 Utemeljitev zahtevane višine nepovratnih sred‐ stev se lahko zelo razlikuje, med drugim glede na posebno oviro na trgu, ki se obravnava, dostopnost za ciljne skupine, zrelost projekta, razmere na lokal‐ nem trgu, razpoložljivost sredstev drugih ponudni‐ kov financiranja in zmogljivost ter pripravljenost za tveganje izvajalcev projekta.
This variance, coupled with the dearth of reliable market information in partner countries, makes it challenging to establish criteria for setting the amounts of grants cover‐ ing every possible intervention in every possible dynamic market context. 
Zaradi teh razlik in pomanjkanja zanesljivih tržnih informacij v partner‐ skih državah je težko opredeliti merila za določanje višine nepovratnih sredstev, ki pokrivajo vse možne posege v vseh možnih razmerah dinamičnega trga.
Ultimately the Commis‐ sion has to rely to some extent on the ability of partner finance institutions to negotiate the best deal, i.e. the minimum grant amount, to catalyse a specific project. 
Nenazadnje se mora Komisija do neke mere opreti na sposobnost partnerskih finančnih institucij, da se izpogajajo za najboljšo ponudbo, tj. najnižja nepovratna sredstva, za spodbuditev posameznega projekta.
There are no viable alternatives to this ‘pricing’ process for some projects. 
V zvezi z nekaterimi projekti za ta posto‐ pek „določanja cen“ ni izvedljivih nadomestnih možnosti.
For exam‐ ple, the size of a first loss guarantee for lending to SMEs is not generally determined by historical experience (if there is any) but rather by the lenders’ perceived risk — a subjective parameter that can only be determined through skilled negotiation. 
Višina jamstva ob prvi izgubi pri posojilih za mala in srednje velika podjetja (MSP) na splošno na primer ni določena s predhodno izkušnjo (če ta obstaja), ampak z dojemanjem tveganja posojilo‐ dajalcev, kar je subjektivni parameter, ki se lahko opredeli le v okviru spretnih pogajanj.
Whilst the assessment was challenging in the absence of comparisons between similar projects in the early years of the blending facilities, the Com‐ mission builds on experience acquired over the years to refine the assessment process. 
Medtem ko je bilo zaradi odsotnosti primerjave med podobnimi projekti v zgodnjih letih uporabe instrumentov kombiniranja težko izvesti oceno, Komisija za izboljšanje postopka ocenjevanja gradi na izkušnjah, pridobljenih v zadnjih letih.
Indeed, with the reform of blending discussed and agreed recently, the grant amount provided as financing will be further subject to comparability and increased value for money. 
Dejansko bo z reformo kombiniranja, ki je bila nedavno obravnavana in sprejeta, višina nepovrat‐ nih sredstev, zagotovljenih v obliki financiranja, nadalje odvisna od primerljivosti in povečane stroš‐ kovne učinkovitosti.
31 There is no evidence to suggest that it has materi‐ alised so far. 
31 Do zdaj ni dokazov, ki bi kazali na to, da se je nave‐ deno uresničilo.
The Commission’s partners are devel‐ opment banks, not commercial banks; their main objective is to contribute to development funding. 
Partnerji Komisije so razvojne in ne poslovne banke, pri čemer je njihov glavni cilj pri‐ spevati k financiranju razvoja.
Nevertheless, the confidentiality around pricing models and decisions has indeed hindered wide‐ spread use of the interest rate subsidy instrument. 
Kljub temu je zaup‐ nost v zvezi z modeli določanja cen in odločitvami dejansko ovirala širšo uporabo instrumenta subven‐ cije obrestne mere.
Where interest rate subsidies are used, the Commis‐ sion relies, in particular, on its own supervision of the multilateral institutions (e.g. through the pillars assessment) and on national oversight and regula‐ tion governing the bilateral institutions as elements mitigating this risk. 
Kadar se uporabljajo subvencije obrestne mere, se Komisija opira zlasti na lasten nadzor večstranskih institucij (npr. prek ocenjevanja stebrov) in na nacio‐ nalni nadzor ter predpise, ki urejajo dvostranske institucije, kot elemente za blaženje tega tveganja.
The calculation of interest rates made by the banks will be subject to scrutiny and benchmarking. 
Za izračun obrestnih mer s strani bank se bodo upo‐ rabljali pregledi in primerjalne analize.
32 In indirect centralised or joint management the advance disbursements were indeed high at the moment of the creation of the first facilities. 
32 Pri posrednem centraliziranem ali skupnem uprav‐ ljanju so bila vnaprejšnja izplačila ob vzpostavitvi prvih instrumentov zares visoka.
This was motivated by the need to launch a new aid modality and encourage the financial institutions to take over the management of complex projects. 
To je bilo uteme‐ ljeno s potrebo, da se vzpostavi nova oblika pomoči in da se finančne institucije spodbudijo k prevzemu upravljanja zapletenih projektov.