natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Payment of social allowances to staff members Staff should be requested to deliver at appropriate intervals documents confirming their personal situation. 
Izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov uslužbencem Od uslužbencev bi morali zahtevati, da v ustreznih razmikih predložijo dokumente, ki dokazujejo njihove osebne razmere.
In addition, the Parliament should implement a system for the timely monitoring and control of these documents. 
Poleg tega bi moral Parlament uporabljati sistem za pravo­ časno spremljanje in preverjanje teh dokumentov.
Commission — DG RELEX As mentioned in Annex 7.4 of the 2010 Annual Report the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS) would be an opportunity to remind staff of the obligations to update files when rights are concerned and to set up adequate controls. 
Komisija – GD RELEX Kot je omenjeno v Prilogi 7.4 letnega poročila za leto 2010, bi bila ustanovitev Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) priložnost, da se uslužbence opozori na njihovo obveznost, da posodobijo spise, kadar to zadeva pravice, in da se vzpostavijo ustrezne kontrole.
The Court's audit showed, however, that the risk of making incorrect or undue payments remains. 
Kljub temu pa je revizija Sodišča pokazala, da tveganje nepravilnih ali neupravičenih izplačil še vedno obstaja.
Commission Payment of social allowances and benefits to staff members An automatic update of the amounts of the allowances of like nature from the Belgian State is being implemented by the Commission in SYSPER2/Rights (the Information System for the management of Individual Entitlements) since April 2012. 
Komisija Izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov in prejemkov uslužbencem Komisija od aprila 2012 samodejno posodablja zneske podobnih dodatkov, ki jih izplačuje Belgija, v sistemu SYSPER2/pravice (infor­ macijski sistem za upravljanje posameznih pravic).
ANNEX 9.3 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND OTHER EXPENDITURE Additionally, a new module will be put in place in the front office of SYSPER2/Rights. 
PRILOGA 9.3 Poleg tega bo vzpostavljen nov modul v zunanjem poslovanju sistema SYSPER2/pravice.
EEAS The Paymaster Office (PMO), which is responsible for the adminis­ tration of entitlements of EEAS staff in headquarters, will adopt an automatic updating of benefits received from other sources. 
ESZD Urad PMO, ki zagotavlja upravljanje v zvezi z uslužbenci ESZD na sedežu ESZD, bo samodejno posodobil podatke o prejemkih iz drugih virov.
The automatic updating will be introduced for EEAS staff in Head­ quarters during the last quarter of 2012. 
Ta posodobitev se bo za uslužbence ESZD na sedežu ESZD izvajala od jeseni 2012.
In conformity to Article 67 of the Staff Regulations, also EEAS officials in Delegations will be requested to declare in Sysper 2 their benefits received from other sources. 
Kar zadeva uslužbence ESZD v delegacijah, bo ESZD zahtevala, naj prijavijo „prejemke iz drugih virov“ („PDV“) v sistemu Sysper2, in jih tako pozvala k izpolnjevanju obveznosti iz člena 67 Kadrovskih predpisov.
EN C 344/222 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 Year Court recommendation Court's analysis of the progress made Institution reply 2009 Staff should be requested to deliver at appropriate intervals documents proving their personal situation. 
SL C 344/222 Uradni list Evropske unije 12.11.2012 Leto Priporočilo Sodišča Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov Doseženi napredek po analizi Sodišča Odgovor institucije 2009 Od uslužbencev bi morali zahtevati, da v ustreznih razmikih predložijo dokumente, ki dokazujejo njihove osebne razmere.
In this respect, the European Data Protection Supervisor should improve its system for the timely monitoring and control of these docu­ ments. 
V skladu s tem bi moral Evropski nadzornik za varstvo po­ datkov izboljšati sistem za pravočasno spremljanje in prever­ janje teh dokumentov.
European Data Protection Supervisor As mentioned in Annex 7.4 of the 2010 Annual Report the EDPS has implemented tools for better management of the allowances (formal contacts within the EDPS' Office and with the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements and yearly information fiche). 
Izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov uslužbencem Kot je omenjeno v Prilogi 7.4 letnega poročila za leto 2010, je Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov uvedel orodja za boljše upravljanje dodatkov (uradni stiki znotraj Urada Evrop­ skega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov in z Uradom za vodenje in plačevanje posameznih pravic ter letni informativni obra­ zec).
The Court's audit showed that these measures were effective. 
Revizija Sodišča je pokazala, da so bili ti ukrepi uspešni.
The EDPS takes good note of the result of the Court's analysis and intends to continue to improve its system for timely monitoring and control. 
ENVP se je podrobno seznanil z rezultati analize, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, in namerava nadalje izboljševati svoj sistem za pravočasno spremljanje in nadzor.
EN C 344/224 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S INTRODUCTION 10.1. ThisChapterfocusesonperformance.Aninitial,short section covers the Commission’s first evaluation report (1). The remainder of the Chapter presents the Court’s observations on the Commission’s self-assessments on performance as stated in part 1 of the annual activity reports of the Commission’s directors-general (2), and highlights some of the main themes arising from the Court’s 2011 special reports on perform­ ance (3). 
SL C 344/224 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A UVOD 10.1 Vtempoglavjujeobravnavanasmotrnostposlovanja. Najprej je v kratkem razdelku opisano prvo poročilo o oceni financ Unije, ki ga je pripravila Komisija(1), v preostanku poglavja pa so nato predstavljena opažanja Sodišča o samoo­ cenah Komisije o smotrnosti poslovanja (2), deloma predstav­ ljenih v delu 1 letnih poročil generalnih direktorjev Komisije o dejavnostih, ter izpostavljene nekatere ključne teme iz posebnih poročil Sodišča o smotrnosti poslovanja iz leta 2011 (3).
Performance is assessed on the basis of the sound financial management principles (economy, efficiency and effectiveness) (4). 
10.2 Smotrnostposlovanjaseocenjujenapodlaginačel dobrega finančnega poslovodenja (gospodarnost, učinkovitost in uspešnost) (4).
Its measurement is key throughout the public intervention process, covering inputs (financial, human, material, organisational or regulatory means needed for the implementation of the programme), outputs (the deliverables of the programme), results (the immediate effects of the programme on direct addressees or recipients) and impacts (long-term changes in society that are, at least partly, attributable to the EU’s action). 
Njeno merjenje je ključno v celotnem procesu javnega posredovanja in zajema vložke (finančna, kadrovska, materialna, organizacijska ali zakonska sredstva, potrebna za izvedbo programa), izložke (kaj je bilo narejeno v okviru programa), rezultate (takojšnji vplivi programa na neposredne naslovnike ali prejemnike) in učinke (dolgoročne spremembe v družbi, ki jih je vsaj delno mogoče pripisati ukrepanju EU).
EVALUATION REPORT ON THE UNION’S FINANCES BASED ON RESULTS ACHIEVED 10.3. InFebruary2012,theCommissionpublishedareport to the European Parliament and the Council on the evaluation of the Union’s finances based on the results achieved (the evaluation report) (5). 
POROČILO O OCENI FINANC UNIJE GLEDE NA DOSEŽENE REZULTATE 10.3 Komisija je februarja 2012 objavila poročilo Evrop­ skemu parlamentu in Svetu o oceni financ Unije glede na dosežene rezultate (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poročilo o oceni) (5).
The Treaty requires that the Commission produce such a report, and that the report is part of the evidence on which the Parliament gives a discharge each year to the Commission in respect of the budget (6). _____________ (1) Article 318 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) (OJ C 83, 30.3.2010) provides for a report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the evaluation of the Union’s finances based on the results achieved. 
Komisija mora tako poročilo o oceni pripraviti v skladu s Pogodbo, ki prav tako določa, da je to del dokazov, na podlagi katerih Parlament Komisiji vsako leto podeli razrešnico v zvezi s proračunom (6). 12.11.2012 _____________ (1) Člen 318 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) (UL C 83, 30.3.2010) določa, da Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu finančno poročilo Unije glede na dosežene rezultate.
(2) Article 60(7) of the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 
(2) Člen 60(7) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
1) provides that the annual activity reports ‘shall indicate the results of the operations by reference to the objectives set, the risks associated with these operations, the use made of resources provided and the efficiency and effectiveness of the internal control system’. 
1), določa, da letno poročilo o dejavnostih opisuje „rezultate poslo­ vanja glede na zastavljene cilje, tveganja, povezana s tem poslova­ njem, uporabo zagotovljenih sredstev ter učinkovitost in uspešnost sistema notranje kontrole“.
(3) The Court’s special reports cover the EU budget, as well as the European Development Funds. 
(3) Posebna poročila Sodišča obravnavajo proračun EU in evropske razvojne sklade.
(4) Article 27 of the Financial Regulation. 
(4) Člen 27 finančne uredbe.
(5) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the evaluation of the Union’s finances based on the results achieved (COM(2012) 40 final). 
(5) Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o oceni financ Unije glede na dosežene rezultate, COM(2012) 40 final.
(6) Articles 318 and 319 TFEU. 
(6) Člena 318 in 319 PDEU.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/225 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 10.4. InresponsetoaninvitationfromtheParliament,the Court issued Opinion No 4/2012 on the evaluation report (7) in June 2012. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/225 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 10.4 Sodišče je junija 2012 na povabilo Parlamenta izdalo Mnenje št. 4/2012 o poročilu o oceni (7).
In this Opinion the Court states that the evaluation report is vague, short on substance and consequently adds little value, and that the Parliament, Council and Commission should use the opportunity afforded by the report to discuss and agree on how it might be made useful to the discharge authority. 
V njem navaja, da je to nejasno, kratko, ima malo vsebine in prinaša malo dodane vrednosti ter da bi morali Parlament, Svet in Komisija izkori­ stiti priložnost, ki jo ponuja, za razpravo in dogovor o tem, kako bi ga bilo treba pripraviti, da bi bilo koristno za organ za razrešnico.
The Court assessed the reporting of three DGs: those for Agriculture and Rural Development (DG AGRI), for Regional Policy (DG REGIO) and for Development and Co-operation — EuropeAid (EuropeAid) (8). 
POROČANJE POSLOVODSTVA KOMISIJE O DOSEŽKIH LETA Uvod 10.5 GeneralnidirektorjiKomisijezasvojegeneralnedirek­ torate določijo cilje smotrnosti poslovanja v letnih načrtih upravljanja, nato pa o dosežkih poročajo v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih. Sodišče je ocenilo poročanje treh generalnih direk­ toratov, in sicer za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja (GD AGRI), za regionalno politiko (GD REGIO) ter za razvoj in sodelovanje – EuropeAid (EuropeAid) (8).
Together these three DGs are responsible for around three-quarters of the payments made from the EU budget in 2011 (9). 
Ti trije generalni direktorati so skupaj odgovorni za približno tri četrtine plačil iz proračuna EU v letu 2011 (9).
The Court considered the changes made to the Commission’s internal reporting arrangements since the previous year and, for the three DGs referred to above, analysed whether the objectives and performance indicators presented were: (a) r e l e v a n t — whether they were coherent with the policy objectives and management mode, and linked to quantified targets; T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 10.4. 
10.6 Sodišče je upoštevalo spremembe v ureditvi notranjega poročanja Komisije od prejšnjega leta ter za omenjene tri gene­ ralne direktorate analiziralo, ali so cilji in z njimi povezani kazalniki smotrnosti poslovanja: (a) r e l e v a n t n i – ali so bili skladni s cilji politike in načinom upravljanja ter povezani s količinsko opredelje­ nimi ožjimi cilji; O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 10.4 Poročilo o oceni za leto 2010 je bilo v začetku leta 2012 predmet razprav z organom za razrešnico.
Based on these discussions, the Commission has reconsidered the approach used for the first Evaluation Report towards more comprehensive reporting on results of activities financed by the budget, relying on existing reporting material. 
Na njihovi osnovi je Komisija vnovič preučila pristop, uporabljen za prvo poročilo o oceni, in se odločila za celovitejše poročanje o rezultatih dejavnosti, ki se financirajo iz proračuna, pri čemer se bo zanašala na obstoječe gradivo za poročanje.
However, the Commission continues further developing the Evaluation Report as a key contribution to the discharge process in the light of the reactions from the discharge authority. _____________ (7) Opinion No 4/2012 on the Commission’s evaluation report on the Union’s finances based on results achieved established under Article 318 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 179, 20.6.2012). 
Komisija kljub temu na podlagi odzivov organa za razrešnico še naprej razvija poročilo o oceni kot ključni prispevek k postopku razrešnice. _____________ (7) Mnenje št. 4/2012 o poročilu Komisije o oceni financ Unije glede na dosežene rezultate skladno s členom 318 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL C 179, 20.6.2012).
(8) The annual activity reports of DG AGRI and DG REGIO were also examined in the Court’s 2010 Annual Report. 
(8) Letni poročili o dejavnostih GD AGRI in GD REGIO je Sodišče pregledalo tudi v letnem poročilu za leto 2010.
EuropeAid was created in January 2011 by the merger of the DGs for Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific States (DG DEV), and the EuropeAid Co-operation Office (DG AIDCO). 
EuropeAid je bil ustanovljen januarja 2011 z združitvijo generalnih direktoratov za razvoj in odnose z afriškimi, karibskimi in pacifiškimi državami (GD DEV) ter Urada za sodelovanje EuropeAid (GD AIDCO).
(9) DG AGRI: 56,2 billion euro, DG REGIO: 32,9 billion euro, Euro­ peAid: 4,1 billion euro. 
(9) GD AGRI: 56,2 milijarde EUR, GD REGIO: 32,9 milijarde EUR, EuropeAid: 4,1 milijarde EUR.
EN C 344/226 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S (b) comparable — whether indicators selected at the planning stage were later used for reporting, with any changes explained; and (c) r e l i a b l e — whether the reader can have reasonable assurance that the reported information is accurate (10). 
SL C 344/226 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A (b) p r i m e r l j i v i – ali so bili kazalniki, izbrani pri načrtova­ nju, pozneje uporabljeni pri poročanju in vse spremembe pojasnjene, ter (c) zanesljivi – ali je bralcu na voljo razumno zagotovilo, da so informacije v poročilu točne (10).
For example, instructions for reporting on policy achievements in the first part of the annual activity report were clarified, with directors-general required to focus more on the progress towards the achievement of the objectives in terms of the results and impact, as well as to provide a description of the outputs secured. 
(11) Pojasnjena so bila, na primer, navodila za poročanje o dosežkih politik v prvem delu letnega poročila o dejavnostih, kjer bi se morali generalni direktorji bolj osredotočiti na napredek pri doseganju ciljev v smislu rezultatov in učinkov ter podati opis zagotovljenih izložkov.
Relevance remains an issue in some cases 10.8. Atthestrategiclevel,DGsarerequiredtodefinea limited number of ‘general objectives’, together with a set of ‘impact indicators’ allowing progress against the general objectives to be tracked. 
V nekaterih primerih je relevantnost še vedno problematična 10.8 Nastrateškiravnimorajogeneralnidirektoratioprede­ liti omejeno število „splošnih ciljev“ in niz „kazalnikov učinka“, ki omogočajo spremljanje napredka pri njihovem doseganju.
The general objectives and impact indicators, taken together, are tools for Commission management — and therefore also for readers of the annual activity report, such as the discharge authority — to assess the extent to which the DG is meeting its high level goals. 
Skupaj so splošni cilji in kazalniki učinka orodje poslovodstva Komisije, posledično pa tudi za bralce letnega poročila o dejav­ nostih, kot je organ za razrešnico, za ocenjevanje uspešnosti generalnih direktoratov pri doseganju njihovih ciljev na visoki ravni.
The Court found a number of problems with the objectives and indicators, limiting their usefulness, as set out in the following paragraphs. _____________ (10) For this aspect, the Court carried out only a limited review — see paragraph 10.17. 
Sodišče je odkrilo več težav v zvezi s cilji in kazalniki, kar omejuje njihovo koristnost, kot je zapisano v nadaljevanju. 12.11.2012 _____________ (10) Ta vidik je Sodišče pregledalo samo v omejenem obsegu – glej odstavek 10.17.
(11) The timing of the Court’s annual report is such that there is limited time available for the Commission’s annual activity reports to take account of its messages. 
(11) Letno poročilo Sodišča se pripravlja v takem časovnem obdobju, da ima Komisija na voljo le malo časa za upoštevanje njegovih sporočil v svojih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 10.9. Example 10.1 DG AGRI: impact indicator does not cover entirety of objective One general objective in the annual activity report has three aims: — topromoteaviableandcompetitiveagriculturalsector, — which respects high environmental and production standards, — ensuring at the same time a fair standard of living for the agricultural community. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 10.9 Primer 10.1 GD AGRI: kazalnik učinka ne zajema celotnega cilja En splošni cilj v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih ima tri namene: — spodbujati donosen in konkurenčen kmetijski sektor, — ki sledi najnovejšim dosežkom na področju okolja in proizvodnje, — in hkrati zagotavlja primeren življenjski standard za kmečko skupnost.
The only impact indicator for this objective is ‘farmers’ income developments’. 
Edini kazalnik učinka za ta cilj je „raven dohodkov kmetov“.
This relates only to the third aim above, meaning that there are no indicators for the first two aims. 
To se nanaša samo na tretji zgoraj navedeni namen, kar pomeni, da za prva dva ni kazalnikov.
EuropeAid: impact indicator formulated as an objective The impact indicator ‘EU coordinated approach’ corresponding to general objective 4: ‘Promote an international development framework based on enhanced multilateral cooperation and global governance’ and having the target ‘New EU budget support contracts are concluded in coherence with the principles of COM 638’ is formulated as an objective rather than an indicator. 
EuropeAid: kazalnik učinka oblikovan kot cilj Kazalnik učinka „usklajen pristop EU“, ki ustreza splošnemu cilju 4 „podpiranje mednarodnega razvojnega okvira na podlagi okrepljenega večstranskega sodelovanja in upravljanja na svetovni ravni“ z ožjim ciljem „novi sporazumi o proračunski podpori EU se sklenejo v skladu z načeli iz COM 638“, je oblikovan kot cilj in ne kot kazalnik.
Example 10.1 The basic requirements of the internal control standard 5 establish that Management Plans should provide for at least one indicator per objective, both at policy area and at activity level, to monitor and report on achievements. 
Primer 10.1 Osnovne zahteve standarda notranje kontrole 5 določajo, da mora biti za spremljanje dosežkov in poročanje o njih v načrtih upravljanja naveden najmanj en kazalnik za posamezen cilj, in sicer tako na ravni področja politike kot na ravni dejavnosti.
This requirement is reproduced in SG standing instructions and DG AGRI is in compliance with it. 
Zahteva je ponovljena v stalnih navodilih generalnega sekretariata in GD AGRI se ravna po njej.
The Commission has made significant efforts to define the objectives and indicators in a coherent and comprehensive way. 
Komisija je vložila veliko truda, da bi cilje in kazalnike opredelila na usklajen in celovit način.
In certain policy areas it is very difficult and it should be taken into consideration that indicators in the AAR should not be read in isolation. 
To je na nekaterih področjih politik zelo težko in upoštevati je treba, da se kazalniki v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih ne smejo obravnavati brez ustreznega konteksta.
The Commission considers that the indicator ‘farmer’s income developments’ does cover the entirety of the general objective 1 as it responds not only to the aim of ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community but also to the viability of farms and rural areas. 
Komisija meni, da kazalnik „razvoj dohodkov kmetov“ zajema celoten splošni cilj 1, saj ustreza namenoma zagotavljanja primernega življenjskega standarda za kmetijsko skupnost ter spodbujanja donosnosti kmetij in podeželja.
Additionally, as for the receipts of single payments farmers need to maintain the land in good agricultural and environmental conditions, the general objective 1 aim of respecting ‘high environmental and production standards’ is also met. 
Ker morajo kmetje, če želijo prejemati enotna plačila, ohranjati svoje zemljišče v dobrem kmetijskem in okoljskem stanju, je izpolnjen tudi preostali namen splošnega cilja 1, torej spoštovati „visoke okoljske in proizvodne standarde“.
The Commission will explore alternative ways of defining indicators based on ‘SMART’ objectives. 10.10. 
Komisija bo preučila drugačne načine opredelitve kazalnikov na podlagi ciljev „SMART“.
Most indicators and targets related to the entire 2007-2013 period, with no use made of interim indicators or milestones. 10.10. 
Večina kazalnikov in ožjih ciljev se je nanašala na celotno obdobje 2007–2013, vmesni kazalniki ali mejniki pa niso bili uporabljeni.
The Commission confirms that it is the very nature of multiannual programmes to invest in the longer term with a possi­ bility to evaluate impact only over a significant period of time. 
10.10 Komisija potrjuje, da so večletni programi že v zasnovi namenjeni dolgoročnim naložbam in je mogoče njihov učinek ocenje­ vati samo za daljše časovno obdobje.
For the 2014-2020 period, the Commission has proposed milestones for output indicators which are more directly related to the policy. 
Za obdobje 2014–2020 je Komisija predlagala uvedbo mejnikov za kazalnike izložka, ki so neposredneje povezani s politiko.
However: (a) of the 29 impact indicators in the three annual activity reports examined, 11 did not have quantified targets — and no deadlines — associated with them (12); (b) for DG REGIO, while all but one of its targets have dead­ lines, these deadlines are frequently at some point in the medium term future. 
Vendar: (a) 11 od skupno 29 kazalnikov učinka v treh pregledanih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih ni bilo povezanih s koli­ činsko opredeljenimi ožjimi cilji niti z roki (12); (b) v primeru GD REGIO so roki sicer določeni za vse ožje cilje razen za enega, vendar pogosto v neki srednjeročni prihodnosti.
As a consequence, its Annual Activity Report for 2011 often reports against results achieved in relation to the previous programming period, 2000-2006. 10.12. 
Zato GD REGIO v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2011 pogosto poroča s sklicevanjem na rezultate, dosežene v zvezi s prejšnjim programskim obdobjem (2000–2006).