natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
41 The complete timeline of the project is available on the Council’s website (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/contact/address/council-buildings/europa-building/timeline-europa-building/). 
41 Celotna časovnica projekta je na voljo na spletišču Sveta (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/contact/address/council-buildings/europa-building/timeline-europa-building/).
42 The convention foresaw a possibility for an amicable settlement of the final price of the project based on supporting documents provided by the state, analysed, and approved by the Council. 
42 V konvenciji je bila predvidena možnost za sporazumno določitev končne cene projekta na podlagi dokazil, ki jih predloži država ter analizira in odobri Svet.
This allowed the Council to negotiate the price which then became final and discharged of all past, present and future obligations. 
To je Svetu omogočalo pogajanje o ceni, ki je nato postala končna ter prosta vseh preteklih, sedanjih in prihodnjih obveznosti.
A number of project management weaknesses contributed to the delays: — The national authorities did not properly manage change requests nor did they pay contractors on time; — The consulting firms contracted by the national authorities had limited capacity to transcribe the Council’s complex functional and quality requirements into tender specifications. 
— Nacionalni organi niso ustrezno upravljali zahtev za spremembe in niso pravočasno plačevali pogodbenih izvajalcev. — svetovalna podjetja, ki so jih najeli nacionalni organi, so se srečevala s težavami pri vključevanju kompleksnih zahtev Sveta glede funkcionalnosti in kakovosti v razpisno specifikacijo.
This hampered the project throughout its life and led to most of the change requests; — Reaching an agreement on the final price was complicated because, even six months after delivery, the national authorities were not able to provide the complete list of invoices. 
To je oviralo projekt v celotni življenjski dobi in povzročilo največ zahtev za spremembe; — sklenitev sporazuma o končni ceni je bila zapletena, saj tudi šest mesecev po koncu nacionalni organi niso mogli zagotoviti popolnega seznama računov.
47 The Council partially mitigated the impact by enlarging its project team and stepping up project management procedures and internal controls. 
47 Svet je vpliv delno zmanjšal tako, da je povečal svojo projektno skupino ter okrepil postopke vodenja projekta in notranji nadzor.
The Parliament’s KAD II project: significant delays leading to additional costs 48 Initially, the KAD II building delivery date was due to be 2013. 
Projekt Parlamenta za zgradbo KAD II: zaradi znatnih zamud so nastali dodatni stroški 48 Sprva bi morala biti zgradba KAD II končana leta 2013.
The current estimate is the following: East construction site - end of 2019, West construction site - 2022. 
Sedanja ocena je naslednja: vzhodno gradbišče – konec leta 2019, zahodno gradbišče – leta 2022.
The main explanations for this delay are the Parliament’s limited experience as a developer at the beginning of the project and an unsuccessful first tender for construction works. 
Glavna pojasnila za to zamudo so omejene izkušnje Parlamenta v vlogi investitorja na začetku projekta in neuspešni prvi javni razpis za gradbena dela.
The set-up of the financial structure and financing model was delayed by three months due to the first unsuccessful tender. 
Zaradi neuspelega prvega javnega razpisa sta bila finančna struktura in model financiranja vzpostavljena s trimesečno zamudo.
49 The original estimated budget of €317.5 million was revised in 2009 to €363 million44. 
49 Prvotni ocenjeni proračun v višini 317,5 milijona EUR je bil leta revidiran in je znašal 363 milijonov EUR44.
In order to ensure the success of the tender, while respecting the allocated budget, the Parliament reduced the size of the project, modified the technical specifications and allowed more competition in the procurement procedure 43 The majority of these changes were due to a new configuration of the European Council and the creation of the post of President with special prerogatives in terms of representation of the Union towards third countries, both a consequence of the Lisbon Treaty. 
Da bi Parlament zagotovil uspešen javni razpis in hkrati upošteval dodeljena proračunska sredstva, je zmanjšal obseg projekta, spremenil tehnične specifikacije in omogočil večjo konkurenco v postopku javnega naročanja, tako da je povečal število lotov.
As the project is not yet finished, the final price is unknown. 
Ker projekt še ni končan, končna cena ni znana.
The Parliament intends to keep the costs within the current budget of €432 million45. Taking into account an 8 % increase in the price index for construction work between 2012 and 2017, construction costs could increase further. 
Parlament ne namerava prekoračiti sedanjega proračuna v višini 432 milijonov EUR.45 Glede na 8-odstotno povečanje indeksa cene za gradbena dela med letoma 2012 in 2017 bi se lahko stroški gradnje še povečali. prve stopnje, ki jo je vložil eden od neuspešnih udeležencev postopka oddaje javnega naročila, ugotovitve precejšnje onesnaženosti tal in strožjih varnostnih zahtev.
50 Due to the delay, the Parliament has to rent other buildings in Luxembourg for a longer period than initially planned. 
26 50 Parlament mora zaradi zamude najemati druge stavbe v Luxembourgu za daljše obdobje od prvotno načrtovanega.
This additional renting cost amounts to €14.4 million per year or €86 million over the six-year period. 
Ti dodatni stroški najema znašajo 14,4 milijona EUR letno ali 86 milijonov EUR v obdobju šestih let.
In accounting terms, this additional renting cost is outweighed by a later start of the depreciation of the new building investment (€17.3 million per year). 
V računovodskem smislu se ti dodatni stroški najema izravnajo s poznim začetkom amortizacije naložbe za novo stavbo (17,3 milijona EUR letno).
The EU taxpayer is nevertheless paying the additional renting cost in addition to paying for the construction of the new building. 
Davkoplačevalci EU kljub temu poleg stroškov za izgradnjo nove stavbe plačujejo tudi dodatne stroške najema.
The Commission's JMO II project: delays and additional costs 51 Lengthy negotiations with the Luxembourgish state delayed the start of the Commission’s major construction project in Luxembourg, JMO II. 
Projekt Komisije za zgradbo JMO II: zamude in dodatni stroški 51 Zaradi dolgotrajnih pogajanj z Luksemburgom je prišlo do zamude pri začetku velikega gradbenega projekta Komisije v Luxembourgu, tj. JMO II.
It took 15 years to reach an initial agreement in 2009. 
Prvi sporazum je bil po 15 letih sklenjen leta 2009.
52 The Commission and the Luxembourgish authorities planned that the building would be delivered in two phases, the first mid-2016 and the second at the end of 2019. 
52 Po načrtih Komisije in luksemburških organov bi se morala gradnja končati v dveh fazah, pri čemer bi se prva faza končala sredi leta 2016 in druga konec leta 2019.
The timeline for delivery of the building was revised several times before the construction works began. 
Časovnica za končanje zgradbe je bila pred začetkom gradbenih del večkrat revidirana.
The last known timetable for the JMO II project sets the delivery date for phase one as February 2023 and for phase 2 as February 2024. 
V zadnjem znanem časovnem razporedu za projekt JMO II je bil za datum končanja prve faze določen februar 2023, za datum končanja druge faze pa februar 2024.
53 The delayed start of the construction project was mainly caused by uncertainties regarding the architectural competition, administrative issues in the tender procedure for earthmoving works, and the additional security measures that had to be incorporated in the project. 
53 Pozen začetek izvajanja gradbenega projekta je bil zlasti posledica negotovosti v zvezi z arhitekturnimi razpisi, upravnih vprašanj v postopku javnega naročanja zemeljskih del in dodatnih varnostnih ukrepov, ki jih je bilo treba vključiti v projekt.
It is still unclear how costs resulting from these delays will be shared with the Luxemburgish authorities. 
Še vedno ni jasno, kako se bodo stroški, nastali zaradi teh zamud, delili z luksemburškimi organi.
In addition, in 2015 the Commission had to evacuate its main building in Luxembourg, the JMO building as a precautionary measure to avoid exposing staff to any potential danger arising from the presence of asbestos. 
Poleg tega je morala Komisija leta 2015 izprazniti svojo glavno zgradbo v Luxembourgu, zgradbo JMO, kot previdnostni ukrep, da bi preprečila izpostavljenost zaposlenih potencialni nevarnosti, ki je posledica prisotnosti azbesta.
It thus rented additional office space in several buildings to relocate the staff. 
Za preselitev zaposlenih je zato najela dodatne prostore v več zgradbah.
54 Considering the initial agreement and the latest known timetable, we estimate that the Commission will incur rental costs of €248 million46 due to the delayed start of the construction project and the need to rent additional office space following the evacuation of the JMO building. 
54 Sodišče glede na prvi sporazum in zadnji znani časovni okvir ocenjuje, da bo zaradi zamud pri gradbenem projektu in potrebe po najemu dodatnih pisarniških prostorov zaradi izpraznjenja stavbe JMO Komisiji nastalo za 248 milijonov EUR46 stroškov najema.
Monitoring and reporting are insufficient 55 We examined how the EU institutions monitor different aspects of their existing building portfolio (e.g. space and facilities management, contractual conditions, compliance with technical specifications) including indicators related to the efficient use and cost of buildings. 
Spremljanje in poročanje sta nezadostna 55 Sodišče je preučilo, kako institucije EU spremljajo različne vidike svojega portfelja obstoječih nepremičnin (npr. upravljanje prostorov in objektov, pogodbeni pogoji, skladnost s tehničnimi specifikacijami), vključno s kazalniki, ki so povezani z učinkovito uporabo in stroški zgradb.
This would provide them with an overview of their portfolio, enabling them to identify potential areas of improvement. 
To bi jim zagotovilo pregled portfelja in jim omogočilo opredelitev področij, na katerih so možne izboljšave.
We examined whether the institutions had improved the standardisation of surface measurement and categorisation and whether it was possible to compare efficiency using the data available internally and reported to the budgetary authorities. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali so institucije izboljšale standardizacijo merjenja in kategorizacije površin ter ali je bilo mogoče učinkovitost primerjati na podlagi podatkov, ki so na voljo interno in se sporočajo proračunskim organom.
The institutions monitor various aspects but not indicators related to efficient use and cost of buildings 56 The institutions use a variety of IT systems and tools to manage and monitor their building portfolio. 
Institucije spremljajo različne vidike, vendar ne kazalnikov, povezanih z učinkovito uporabo in stroški zgradb 56 Institucije za upravljanje in spremljanje portfeljev nepremičnin uporabljajo različne sisteme in orodja IT.
Each aspect of the building portfolio, such as facilities management, space allocation, energy consumption, financial, legal and accounting aspects, is monitored using IT systems or manually via spreadsheets. 
Vsak vidik portfelja nepremičnin, kot so upravljanje objektov, dodelitev prostorov, poraba energije ter finančni, pravni in računovodski vidiki, se spremljajo z uporabo sistemov IT ali ročno s preglednicami.
57 The Commission in Luxembourg uses space allocation reports to manage in a consistent manner the space allocation entitlements defined by the ‘Housing Conditions Manual’. 
57 Komisija v Luxembourgu za dosledno upravljanje na področju pravic do dodelitve prostorov, določenih v priročniku o pogojih namestitve, uporablja poročila o dodelitvi prostorov.
In Brussels, the Commission has been developing its integrated real estate management software since 2015, which should eventually provide one point of access to any information related to the building portfolio of the Commission. 
V Bruslju od leta 2015 razvija lastno celovito programsko opremo za upravljanje nepremičnin, ki bi sčasoma morala postati enotna točka dostopa do vseh informacij, povezanih s portfeljem nepremičnin Komisije.
However, the system currently in use does not produce reports to monitor whether 46 The estimate is based on the latest known schedule from the Commission concerning its abandonment of rented buildings and relocation of staff into JMO II. 
Vendar sistem, ki se zdaj uporablja, ne omogoča generiranja poročil za spremljanje, ali je prostor, dodeljen političnim oddelkom (generalnim direktoratom), skladen s pogoji iz priročnika o pogojih namestitve.
47 Based on the Commission’s hypothesis from 2013, established at the time of signature of the framework contract with the Luxembourgish authorities. 29 
47 Na podlagi domneve Komisije iz leta 2013, ugotovljene v času podpisa okvirne pogodbe z organi Luksemburga.
The Parliament is planning to develop by 2026 a system allowing electronic storage of all building-related information. 
Parlament namerava do leta 2026 razviti sistem, ki bo omogočal elektronsko shranjevanje vseh informacij, povezanih z zgradbami.
59 The majority of institutions do not regularly monitor indicators to assess the efficiency of their building portfolio for management purposes. 
59 Večina institucij ne spremlja redno kazalnikov, da bi ocenila učinkovitost portfelja nepremičnin za namene upravljanja.
60 The Commission in Brussels uses just one indicator linked to the efficiency of office accommodation in its building portfolio: the net office surface allocated per workstation. 
60 Komisija v Bruslju uporablja samo en kazalnik, povezan z učinkovitostjo uporabe pisarniških prostorov v svojem portfelju nepremičnin: dodeljeno neto pisarniško površino na delovno postajo.
It reports an average of 14 m2 with a target of 12 m2 to be reached by 2020, mainly by introducing collaborative spaces. 
Po poročanju znaša povprečna površina 14 m2, pri čemer je cilj, ki ga je treba do leta 2020 doseči zlasti z uvedbo skupnih prostorov, 12 m2.
We did not find any indicators linked to the efficiency of office accommodation in the relevant annual activity reports of the Parliament, Council or Court of Justice, nor did these institutions produce any other management reports assessing the efficiency of office accommodation management. 
Sodišče v zadevnih letnih poročilih o dejavnosti Parlamenta, Sveta ali Sodišča Evropske unije ni našlo kazalnikov, povezanih z učinkovitostjo pisarniških namestitev, prav tako pa te institucije niso pripravile nobenih drugih poročil o upravljanju, v katerih bi se ocenjevala učinkovitost upravljanja pisarniških prostorov.
61 The Commission has nevertheless definitions 49 for efficiency indicators such as net floor area/gross floor area; usable area above ground/net floor area above ground; office area/net floor area above ground. 
61 Komisija ima kljub temu opredelitve49 za kazalnike učinkovitosti, kot so neto površina tal/bruto površina tal, uporabna nadzemna površina/neto nadzemna površina tal in pisarniška površina/neto nadzemna površina tal.
We found evidence that the efficiency of the areas of the building is one of the criteria considered when evaluating offers for new building projects. 
Sodišče je našlo dokaze, da je učinkovitost površin zgradbe eno od meril, ki se upoštevajo pri ocenjevanju ponudb za projekte novogradenj.
However, the Commission does not monitor these indicators on the level of the entire portfolio of buildings. 
Vendar Komisija teh kazalnikov ne spremlja na ravni celotnega portfelja nepremičnin.
62 The ECB applies a well-developed approach to monitoring and reporting on its building portfolio (see Box 4 below). 
62 ECB za spremljanje portfelja nepremičnin in poročanje o njem uporablja dobro razvit pristop (glej okvir 4 spodaj).
49 Definitions are set in the ‘Measuring Code applicable to Commission buildings in Brussels’. 
29 49 Opredelitve so določene v predpisih za merjenje, ki se uporabljajo za zgradbe Komisije v Bruslju.
The available data is not standardised, so institutions cannot easily be compared 63 In 2009, the EU institutions50 adopted the Inter-institutional Measuring Code. 
Razpoložljivi podatki niso standardizirani, zato institucij ni mogoče enostavno primerjati 63 Leta 2009 so institucije EU50 sprejele medinstitucionalne predpise za merjenje.
This code defines measurement methods and basic types of building areas based on German standards. 
V teh predpisih so na podlagi nemških standardov opredeljeni načini merjenja in osnovne vrste zazidalnih območij.
Each institution has further developed this code into more detailed area categories, making it difficult to compare data from different institutions 51. The Commission in Brussels and Luxembourg even use different area categories. 
Vsaka institucija je ta pravila nadalje razvila v podrobnejše kategorije območij, zato je težko primerjati podatke različnih institucij.51 Komisija v Bruslju in Luxembourgu uporablja celo različne kategorije območij.
This makes it difficult for the Commission to draw up reports based on the same parameters . 
Zato težko pripravi poročila na podlagi istih parametrov.
64 Although three of the five institutions examined52 use the same IT platform for their space management, each one was individually customised. 
64 Čeprav tri od petih preučenih institucij52 za upravljanje prostorov uporabljajo isto platformo IT, jo je vsaka prilagodila svojim potrebam.
This has a negative impact on the availability of comparable data. 
To negativno vpliva na razpoložljivost primerljivih podatkov.
65 Every year by 1 June, the institutions provide the budgetary authorities with a detailed report about their building policy53. This requirement was introduced by the Financial Regulation in 2013. 
65 Institucije vsako leto do 1. junija proračunskim organom predložijo podrobno poročilo o svoji nepremičninski politiki.53 Ta zahteva je bila leta 2013 uvedena s finančno uredbo.
The report must include expenditure and surface per building, as well as the expected evolution of the programming of surfaces and 50 Although the ECB is not part of this agreement, it applies the same standards. 
Poročilo mora vključevati odhodke in površino na zgradbo, pa tudi predviden razvoj načrtovanja površine in lokacije v prihodnjih letih. Zaradi te zahteve 50 ECB uporablja iste standarde, čeprav ni podpisnica tega sporazuma.
51 For example, the Council includes small meeting rooms in the lowest sub-category of office space, whereas other EU institutions (Commission, Parliament, Court of Justice) do not. 
51 Svet na primer manjše sejne sobe vključuje v najnižjo podkategorijo pisarniških prostorov, druge institucije EU (Komisija, Parlament, Sodišče Evropske unije) pa ne.
52 Council, Court of Justice, Commission (OIL). 
52 Svet, Sodišče Evropske unije, Komisija (OIL).
53 Annual report on buildings pursuant to Article 203.3 of the Financial Regulation (not applicable to the ECB). 
53 Letno poročilo o nepremičninah v skladu s členom 203(3) finančne uredbe (ne uporablja se za ECB).
This requirement made the institutions’ property situation and actions more transparent for the budgetary authorities and, for some institutions, the public54. 66 Figure 8 below shows that in their annual reports on buildings, each institution uses different surface categories, so these categories cannot be used for comparison purposes. 
31 so stanje nepremičnin in ukrepi institucij preglednejši za proračunske organe in – pri nekaterih institucijah – za javnost.54 66 Na sliki 8 spodaj je prikazano, da vsaka institucija v svojem letnem poročilu uporablja različne kategorije površin, zato teh kategorij ni mogoče uporabiti za primerjavo.
The Financial Regulation does not require information to be included on the number of workstations or staff accommodated. 
V finančni uredbi ni določeno, da morajo biti vključene informacije o številu delovnih postaj oziroma zaposlenih, ki imajo prostore v določeni zgradbi.
It also does not require the inclusion of any efficiency indicators. 
V njej prav tako ni določeno, da je treba vključiti kakršne koli kazalnike učinkovitosti.
Figure 8 – Annual reports on buildings - office space categories 32 Surface categories in the annual report on buildings Institutions using these categories in their annual report Office space (above ground, below ground, total) Specific areas (above ground, below ground, total) Facilities (above ground, below ground, total) Council Office space above ground Non-office space above ground Commission Court of Justice Total gross surface area European Parliament Source: ECA, based on the institutions’ 2017 annual reports on buildings. 
Slika 8 – Letna poročila o nepremičninah – kategorije pisarn Kategorije površin v letnih poročilih o nepremičninah Institucije, ki te kategorije uporabljajo v svojih letnih poročilih Pisarne (nadzemne, podzemne, skupaj) Posebna območja (nadzemna, podzemna, skupaj) Objekti (nadzemni, podzemni, skupaj) Svet Nadzemne pisarne Drugi nadzemni prostori Komisija Sodišče Evropske unije Skupna bruto površina Evropski parlament Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi letnih poročil institucij o nepremičninah za leto 2017.
67 In addition, the Commission’s report does not provide a clear picture of the different types of area in its building portfolio, as it does not clearly define the criteria separatingofficeandnon-officespace.Furthermore, thesurfaceareasusedbythe Commission in the annual report on buildings are not comparable with those recorded in the space management tools. 
67 Poleg tega poročilo Komisije ne zagotavlja jasnega pregleda različnih vrst območij v portfelju nepremičnin, saj ne opredeljuje jasnih meril za ločevanje med pisarnami in drugimi prostori. Poleg tega površine, ki jih Komisija uporablja v letnem poročilu o nepremičninah, niso primerljive s površinami, evidentiranimi v orodjih za upravljanje prostorov.
68 The most recent attempt to produce consolidated information on the buildings of the EU institutions dates back to 2010. 
68 Zadnja prizadevanja za pripravo konsolidiranih informacij o nepremičninah institucij EU so potekala leta 2010.
The EU institutions drew up a report in the context of the Draft Budget 2011 in response to a request by the Parliament and the Council to “provide comprehensive information on building matters with the 54 The Council’s, the Commission’s, and the Court of Justice’s annual reports on buildings are public documents. 
Institucije EU so pripravile poročilo v okviru osnutka proračuna za leto 2011 kot odgovor na zahtevo Parlamenta in Sveta, „naj priskrbijo izčrpne informacije o zadevah v zvezi z zgradbami s predhodnimi predlogi 54 Letna poročila o nepremičninah Sveta, Komisije in Sodišča Evropske unije so javni dokumenti.
This report56 presented data on the following ratios for the institutions’ building portfolio: — share of office and non-office space in total space; — office space/employee; — average expenditure/ m2. 
proračuna/ocenami”.55 V tem poročilu56 so bili predstavljeni podatki o naslednjih razmerjih v portfeljih nepremičnin: — delež pisarn in drugih prostorov glede na skupni prostor; — pisarniški prostori/zaposlenega; — povprečni odhodki/m2.
69 The values of the indicators varied substantially between institutions. 
69 Vrednosti kazalnikov so se med institucijami precej razlikovale.
We did not receive any evidence that the data provided had been analysed, or that the institutions would be required to improve the comparability of the indicators or produce the reports more regularly. 
Sodišče ni prejelo dokazov, da so bili predloženi podatki analizirani ali da se je od institucij zahtevalo, da izboljšajo primerljivost kazalnikov oziroma poročila pripravljajo bolj redno.
Surface indicators are comparable between institutions but costs vary considerably 70 Based on the information available and making corrections where necessary, we compared the efficiency of the institutions building policies. 
Kazalniki površin so med institucijami primerljivi, stroški pa se precej razlikujejo 70 Sodišče je na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij in ob upoštevanju popravkov, kadar so bili potrebni, primerjalo učinkovitost nepremičninskih politik institucij.