natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Small-scale investment total The overall objective is broad and accompanied by indicators which do not measure the extent to which it has been achieved. 
Višina investicij manjšega merila Splošni cilj je obsežen in ga spremljajo kazalniki, ki pa ne merijo, v kolikšni meri je bil dosežen.
There are numerous sub-objectives. 
Podcilji so številni.
Corresponding indicators have been defined, but in view of the number involved, they are difficult to handle. and market integration 2. 
Pripadajoči kazalniki so bili opredeljeni, vendar je zaradi njihovega števila z njimi težko ravnati. čevanje 2. Povečati investicijske tokove, gospo-3.
Rail and other connections between economic relations and visitors main urban centres between the two countries 3. 
Železniške in druge povezave med glavnimi urbanimi središči darske odnose in pretok obiskovalcev med obema državama 3.
To plan the use of the territory in order to increase its competitiveness, 4. 
Načrtovati uporabo ozemelj, da bi tako povečali njihovo konkurenčnost 4.
To promote territorial integration and the development of rural areas world 2. 
Spodbujati ozemeljsko vključevanje in razvoj podeželskih območij
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/25 Western Mediterranean (Strand B) To increase territorial competitiveness throughout the Mdoc area; strengthen the cohesion of the cooperational area by making land development policies more consistent through enhanced interinstitutional integration; to foster and initiate richer, more numerous, transnational cooperation initiatives with a view to sustainable development on the scale of the European regions eligible for the programme, and with the non-member countries on the southern shores of the Mediterranean. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/25 Program pobude Skupnosti Splošni cilj Merjenje celostnega učinka ali rezultata Prednostne naloge ali podcilji Merjenje učinka ali rezultata Zahodno Sredozemlje (usmeritev B) Povečati konkurenčnost ozemlja zahodnega Sredozemlja v celoti; utrditi kohezijo prostora za sodelovanje z bolj skladnimi politikami ozemeljskega razvoja s pomočjo poudarjene medinstitucionalne integracije; pospeševati in vpeljati bogatejše in številnejše transnacionalne pobude za sodelovanje z vizijo trajnostnega razvoja evropskih regij, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za program, kot tudi z državami nečlanicami z južnih obal Sredozemskega morja.
Number of organisations involved in Four priorities: Examples of result indicators for priority 1: North (Strand C) Improving the effectiveness of regional Ń development and cohesion policies and tools through the creation of networks, especially for the regions whose development is lag-Ń Ń CIP Overall objective Measure of overall impact or result Priority or sub-objective Measure of impact or result The overall objective is very broad and cannot be measured by means of the indicators adopted. ging behind and the reconversion regions. 
Število v projektih sodelujočih organov 2. Število izvedenih strateških in prostor-4 prednostne naloge: Primeri kazalnikov rezultatov za prednostno nalogo 1: Severno območje (usmeritev C) Izboljšanje učinkovitosti politik in instrumentov regionalnega razvoja in kohezije s povezovanjem v omrežja zlasti za regije, katerih razvoj je v zaostanku ali v prilagajanju. — — — Splošni cilj je zelo širok in ga izbrani kazalniki ne merijo.
The Strand C objectives and CIPs have not yet been adequately defined. 
Kazalniki še niso oblikovani.
(1) The term ÔimpactŐ refers to long-term effects, while ÔresultsŐ are direct and immediate. projects 2. 
(1) Izraz „učinek“ se nanaša na dolgoročne vplive, medtem ko se izraz „rezultat“ nanaša na neposredne in takojšnje vplive. skih analiz 3.
Number of networks involving public 3. 
Število omrežij, ki vključujejo javne 3.
4. bodies 4. 
4. organe 4.
Number of projects involving more Ń Ń Number of people trained Number of portals shared by more than one undertaking on the two shores of the Mediterranean Increase in the rate of use of the new technologies by the authorities and undertakings being financed than two countries, or at least one non-member country. 
Število projektov, ki vključujejo vsaj — — dve državi ali vsaj eno državo nečlanico Število skupnih portalov, ki jih deli več podjetij na obeh bregovih Sredozemskega morja Povečanje stopnje uporabe novih tehnologij s strani oblasti in financiranih gospodarskih družb 1. 2.
C 303/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 S I G o i g e R Interreg IIIA programms (2000-2006) Canarias (E) 1. 
C 303/26 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 S I G o i g e R Interreg IIIA programms (2000-2006) Canarias (E) 1.
48 49 Map 1 (F) (F) Guyane (F) (F) Madeira (P) Aores (P) 20. 
48 49 Karta 1 (F) (F) Guyane (F) (F) Madeira (P) Açores (P) 20.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union Map 2 Interreg IIIB (2000-2006): Cooperation areas C 303/27 Northern Periphery North Sea Baltic Sea North West Europe Atlantic Area CADSES South West Europe Western Mediterranean Alpine Space Northern Periphery North West Europe South West Europe North Sea Atlantic Area Archimed Non-E.U. areas are indicative only. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije Karta 2 Interreg IIIB (2000-2006): Cooperation areas C 303/27 Northern Periphery North Sea Baltic Sea North West Europe Atlantic Area CADSES South West Europe Western Mediterranean Alpine Space Northern Periphery North West Europe South West Europe North Sea Atlantic Area Archimed Non-E.U. areas are indicative only. © EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries S G I R e g i o Vir: Komisija, GD REGIO.
C 303/28 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 S I G R e g i o INTERREG IIIC (2000-2006) South West North East North East South West Source: Commission, DG REGIO. 
C 303/28 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 S I G R e g i o INTERREG IIIC (2000-2006) South West North East North East South West Vir: Komisija, GD REGIO.
Map 3 Canarias (E) Guadeloupe Martinique Runion (F) (F) Madeira (P) (F) Guyane (F) Aores (P) INTERREG IIIC 0 100 500km Š EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries 
Karta 3 Canarias (E) Guadeloupe Martinique Réunion (F) (F) Madeira (P) (F) Guyane (F) Açores (P) INTERREG IIIC 0 100 500km © EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/29 THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES SUMMARY III. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/29 POVZETEK III.
In view of the large number of cross-border programmes, the many different types of area concerned and the priority objective of developing cross-border economic and social centres, the Commission opted in its guidelines for a bottom-up approach. 
Ob upoštevanju številnih čezmejnih programov, različnosti zadevnih območij kot tudi prednostnega cilja o razvoju čezmejnih gospodarskih in družbenih polov je Komisija v svojih usmeritvah izbrala pristop „od spodaj navzgor“.
This is why the guidelines for strands A and C refer to the priority areas in relatively broad and non-exhaustive terms. 
Zaradi tega usmeritve za dela A in C na razmeroma obsežen in neizčrpen način omenjajo prednostna področja.
The added value is to be found in the development of cross-border cooperation and in the catalyst effect this produces. 
Korist je v razvoju čezmejnih sodelovanj in združujočih učinkih, ki iz tega sledijo.
The indicators should measure progress made in this field. 
Kazalci morajo meriti na tem področju dosežen napredek.
However, the intangible nature of a great many operations made it difficult to devise targeted indicators. 
Vendarle je neotipljivost velikega števila ukrepov otežila dokončno oblikovanje ciljnih kazalcev.
The main actors were familiar with the general points of the guidelines, and the Commission had been in regular contact with them well before the guidelines were published. 
Glavni akterji so poznali glavne poteze usmeritev in Komisija je imela z njimi redne stike dolgo pred objavo usmeritev.
Even though improvements are always possible, the Commission believes that the procedural stages were adequately prepared and that the main shortcomings had been corrected, as far as was possible given that there had to be some negotiation. 
Čeprav so izboljšave vedno mogoče, Komisija meni, da je v mejah, ki ji jih je nalagal pogajalski položaj, na zadovoljiv način pripravila postopke in dosegla odpravo poglavitnih pomanjkljivosti.
The delays were largely due to the time taken to remedy these shortcomings given the need to secure the agreement of all the Member States concerned. 
Zamude so v veliki meri nastale zaradi časa, ki je bil potreben za odpravljanje teh pomanjkljivosti, ker je bilo treba pridobiti soglasje vseh zadevnih držav članic.
The delays had little impact on the start-up of the programmes. 
Učinek zamud na začetek izvajanja programov je bil omejen.
V. The creation of genuine joint management structures with their own legal personality would facilitate implementation of cooperation programmes. 
V. Oblikovanje resničnih skupnih upravljalnih struktur s statusom pravne osebe bo olajšalo izvajanje programov sodelovanja.
In its third report on economic and social cohesion the Commission announced that it intended to propose to the Council a new legal instrument, in the form of a European cooperation structure. 
Komisija je v svojem tretjem poročilu o ekonomski in socialni koheziji napovedala, da namerava Svetu predlagati nov pravni instrument v obliki strukture evropskega sodelovanja.
The bottom-up approach brings out concerns not identified by expert analysis but expressed by regional and local authorities which feed into the strategy and choice of priorities. 
Pristop „od spodaj navzgor“ je pokazal skrbi, ki jih iz-vedenske analize niso ugotovile, so jih pa izrazili regionalni in lokalni organi oblasti, ki skrbijo za strategijo in izbiro prednostnih nalog.
As the overall objective of the cross-border CIPs is to contribute to the development of cross-border economic and social centres, any project which facilitates cooperation on this point can participate in the objective. 
Ker je okvirni cilj čezmejnih programov pobud Skupnosti prispevati k razvoju čezmejnih gospodarskih in družbenih polov, lahko k temu cilju prispeva vsak projekt, ki olajšuje sodelovanje.
The Commission recognises that there is a difficulty in finding suitable indicators due to the fact that the added value of the Interreg Initiative takes a variety of forms. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da je težko najti primerne kazalce, ker se korist pobude Interreg kaže v različnih oblikah.
The sets of indicators in individual Interreg III programmes are, however, a promising start in this direction. 
Vrste kazalcev v posameznih programih Interreg III so vendarle obetaven začetek v tej smeri.
The Commission encouraged Member States to put in place IT project management systems and databases to compile information for use with indicators. 
Komisija je spodbudila države članice k vzpostavitvi informacijskih sistemov za vodenje projektov ter podatkovnih baz, v katerih se bodo zbirale informacije o kazalcih.
After the mid-term assessments, the Commission urged many programme management authorities to improve the systems of indicators. 
Komisija je po opravljenem vmesnem vrednotenju pri organih upravljanja programov pogosto vztrajala pri izboljšavi sistemov kazalcev.
As part of the simplification drive, the Commission called on Member States to simplify and reduce the number of their impact indicators. 
Komisija je v okviru poenostavljanja pozvala države članice, da poenostavijo in omejijo število njihovih kazalcev rezultatov.
The Commission considers that added value is greater if CIPs contribute to creating cross-border economic centres rather than simply resolving problems still existing at borders. 
Komisija meni, da je korist večja, če programi pobud Skupnosti prispevajo k nastanku čezmejnih gospodarskih polov, kot če prispevajo samo k reševanju preostalih težav na mejah.
The choice of this approach affects the possibility of laying down standard indicators, even if improvements are possible in this field. 
Izbira tega pristopa vpliva na možnost predvidevanja standardnih kazalcev, čeprav so na tem področju možne izboljšave.
X. The Commission will present the guidelines and methodology documents well before the next programming period gets under way. 
X. Komisija bo metodološke usmeritve in dokumente predstavila precej pred začetkom naslednjega programskega obdobja.
The Commission is reviewing the role of ex ante evaluation in preparing the new regulations. 
Komisija premišljuje o vlogi predhodne ocenitve v okviru priprav na novo zakonodajo.
The Commission will examine the CourtŐs recommendation when preparing the next programming period. It is working on the legal cooperation instruments. 
Komisija bo preučila priporočila Sodišča v okviru priprav na prihodnje programsko obdobje. Pripravlja pravne instrumente sodelovanja.
INTRODUCTION 4. (a) The Commission would point out that the recommendation made in 4(a) has been taken into account in the guidelines for Interreg III. 
INTRODUCTION ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 4. (a) The Commission would point out that the recommendation made in 4(a) has been taken into account in the guidelines for Interreg III.
C 303/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 16. 
C 303/30 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 16.
In its guidelines the Commission gives European economic interest groupings (EEIGs) as one of the avenues to be explored; this was done in a number of programmes but the results were rather disappointing, as is stated in paragraph 44. 
In its guidelines the Commission gives European economic interest groupings (EEIGs) as one of the avenues to be ex-plored; this was done in a number of programmes but the results were rather disappointing, as is stated in paragraph 44.
Both in the guidelines and during the negotiations the Member States were recommended, inter alia, because of the limited funds available, to focus the actions in each programme on certain prioritised measures deriving from the socio-economic analysis of the situation in the regions concerned. 
Both in the guidelines and during the negotiations the Member States were recom-mended, inter alia, because of the limited funds available, to focus the actions in each programme on certain prioritised measures deriving from the socio-economic analysis of the situation in the regions concerned.
The Commission wanted to leave the decentralised public authorities the choice of areas in which they wished to cooperate to improve their development policies and instruments. 
The Commission wanted to leave the decentralised public authorities the choice of areas in which they wished to coop-erate to improve their development policies and instruments.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/31 25. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/31 25.
The corrected version of the programme, which was judged admissible, added the creation of a genuine JTS for support for the overall management of the programme (in the managing authority) and of the subprogrammes as regards operations coming under the responsibility of the central authorities of the two countries. 
The corrected version of the programme, which was judged admissible, added the creation of a genu-ine JTS for support for the overall management of the programme (in the managing authority) and of the subpro-grammes as regards operations coming under the responsibility of the central authorities of the two countries.
C 303/32 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 39. 
C 303/32 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 39.
The Commission would refer to methodology working document No 2 ÔEx ante evaluation of Structural Fund operationsŐ which recommends an independent and objective evaluation, underlines the principle of proportionality, advocates an interactive link between ex ante evaluation and preparation of the strategy and proposes that the work of the evaluators be transmitted to the Commission either as an annex or as a document or series of separate documents. 
The Commission would refer to methodology working document No 2 ‘Ex ante evaluation of Structural Fund operations’ which recommends an independent and objective evaluation, un-derlines the principle of proportionality, advocates an interactive link between ex ante evaluation and preparation of the strategy and proposes that the work of the evaluators be transmitted to the Commission either as an annex or as a document or series of separate documents.
Due to the specificities of the three strands, the involvement of the various partners was different. 
Due to the specificities of the three strands, the involve-ment of the various partners was different.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/33 60. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/33 60.
C 303/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 73. 
C 303/34 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 73.
What the Commission has seen so far is that one point criticised in a good many reports is that project partners can each determine their own indicators; in its official reaction to the reports the Commission will recommend that project partners be required to use the indicators stipulated in the programming documents (programme and complement). 
What the Commission has seen so far is that one point criticised in a good many reports is that project partners can each determine their own indi-cators; in its official reaction to the reports the Commission will recommend that project partners be required to use the indicators stipulated in the programming documents (programme and complement).
It reminded Member States of this recommendation in the simplification exercise (Communication of 25 April 2003 (C(2003) 1255)). 
It reminded Member States of this recommendation in the simplification exercise (Com-munication of 25 April 2003 (C(2003) 1255)).
These two approaches are not therefore mutually exclusive, as is shown by the examples of targeting on specific problems that the Court quotes in paragraph 58. 
These two ap-proaches are not therefore mutually exclusive, as is shown by the examples of targeting on specific problems that the Court quotes in paragraph 58.
The Commission organised systematic assessment of the quality of the proposals and monitored the action taken on its observations. 
The Commission organised systematic assessment of the quality of the proposals and monitored the action taken on its ob-servations.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/35 88. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/35 88.
The Interact programme is an indication of the importance the Commission and the Member States attach to improving the design and implementation of these programmes by exchanging methods and experience between managers, Member States and the Commission. (a) The Commission is looking into the problems with indicators in the mid-term reviews (see reply to paragraph 73). (b) The Court itself observes (paragraph 67) that most of the projects selected so far satisfy the trans-European criterion. 
The Interact programme is an indication of the importance the Commission and the Member States attach to improving the design and implementation of these programmes by ex-changing methods and experience between managers, Member States and the Commission. (a) The Commission is looking into the problems with indicators in the mid-term reviews (see reply to paragraph 73). (b) The Court itself observes (paragraph 67) that most of the projects selected so far satisfy the trans-European criterion.
The Commission does not believe that projects should be concerned solely with resolving specific border-related problems (see paragraphs 58 and 63). 
The Commission does not believe that projects should be concerned solely with resolving specific border-related problems (see paragraphs 58 and 63).
98. (a) The Interact programme also helps to prepare the future. 
98. (a) The Interact programme also helps to prepare the future.
However, the Commission believes that in view of the different situations which exist, the analyses must be conducted border by border within a wide-ranging partnership on the responsibility of the authorities in charge of the cross-border programmes and not on the CommissionŐs responsibility. (b) For all the objectives of the forthcoming programming period 2007 to 2013, the Commission will propose that the Council adopt strategic EU guidelines for cohesion policy. 
However, the Commission believes that in view of the different situations which exist, the analyses must be conducted border by border within a wide-ranging partnership on the responsibility of the authorities in charge of the cross-border programmes and not on the Commission’s responsibility. (b) For all the objectives of the forthcoming programming period 2007 to 2013, the Commission will propose that the Council adopt strategic EU guidelines for cohesion policy.
These guidelines will serve as a framework for preparing and implementing fund programming, including the European territorial cooperation objective. (e) The Commission will present the guidelines and methodology documents before the next programming period gets under way. (g) The Commission has announced that programme complements will be dropped in the next programming period. (h) The Commission will consider the CourtŐs recommendation when preparing the new period. (i) The Commission will propose a specific Council regulation on this subject. 
These guidelines will serve as a framework for preparing and implementing fund programming, including the European territorial cooperation objective. (e) The Commission will present the guidelines and methodology documents before the next programming period gets under way. (g) The Commission has announced that programme complements will be dropped in the next programming period. (h) The Commission will consider the Court’s recommendation when preparing the new period. (i) The Commission will propose a specific Council regulation on this subject.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 6/2004 The organisation of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals in the European Union together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 248(4) of the EC Treaty) (2005/C 29/01) Photograph: Animal wearing the two statutory ear tags 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 29/1 I (Informacije) RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE POSEBNO POROČILO št.
C 29/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ 
RevizijaSodišča.........................................................
INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 
SvetEUinEvropskiparlament .............................................
Generalcontext......................................................... 
ZakonodajaSkupnostinidovoljnatančna ....................................
TheCourtŐsaudit........................................................ 
UGOTOVITVE V ZVEZI Z UPRAVLJANJEM SISTEMA NA RAVNI SKUPNOSTI . . . . . . . . . . .
GENESISANDEVOLUTIONOFTHESYSTEM..................................... 
Ninatančnihpravilzaupravljanjenacionalnihpodatkovnihbaz ...................
ROLES AND LEGAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE VARIOUS PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE CATTLE IDENTIFICATIONANDREGISTRATIONSYSTEM.................................. 
Ni kriterijev za priznanje popolnoma operativnega značaja podatkovnih baz . . . . . . . . .
TheMemberStates ...................................................... 
NadzorsstraniKomisije..................................................
Legislation makes no provision for exchanges of information between the databases Communitylegislationisnotsufficientlyprecise ............................... The Commission has no mandate to adopt implementing measures in respect of national databases.............................................................. 
Nedoslednostipriupravljanjupremij ........................................