natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reply of the Commission 62 72 Infrastructure projects must ensure that during the 5 years following the final payment, there is no substantial change of the projects affecting their nature, objectives or implementation conditions which would result in undermining of their original objectives. 
Odgovori Komisije 62 72 Infrastrukturni projekti morajo zagotoviti, da se v petletnem obdobju po izvršitvi zadnjega plačila ne opravijo nobene bistvene spremembe projektov, ki bi vplivale na njihovo naravo, cilje ali pogoje izvajanja, zaradi česar bi se razvrednotili njihovi prvotni cilji.
This is to be verified with ex post checks on a sample basis as provided by Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 809/2014. 
To bo preverjeno z naknadnimi pregledi na podlagi vzorcev, kot je določeno v členu 52 Uredbe (ES) št. 809/2014.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 79 and 81 In the 2007-2013 programming period, the CMEF was a new feature. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 79 in 81 V programskem obdobju 2007–2013 je bil skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CMEF) novost.
Some Member States required a learning curve regarding the methodology of data collection, processing and the use of the evaluation results. 
Nekatere države članice so zahtevale izobraževanje v zvezi z metodologijo zbiranja in obdelave podatkov ter uporabe rezultatov vrednotenja.
Information available through the monitoring and evaluation system, while incomplete and possibly not always fully reliable, was the best available at this stage, taking into account financial and practical limitations. 
Informacije, ki so bile na voljo prek sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja, so bile nepopolne in morda niso bile vedno popolnoma zanesljive, vendar so bile ob upoštevanju finančnih in praktičnih omejitev na tej stopnji najboljše razpoložljive.
The Commission has proposed solutions for a number of problems related to the monitoring and evaluation system for the programming period 2014-2020 but there will always be the need to find a balance between the benefits of monitoring and evaluation and the costs and administrative burden related to it. 
Komisija je predlagala rešitve za številne težave, ki so povezane s sistemom spremljanja in vrednotenja za programsko obdobje 2014–2020, vendar bo vedno obstajala potreba, da se vzpostavi ravnotežje med prednostmi, ki jih zagotavlja spremljanje in vrednotenje, ter s tem povezanimi stroški in upravnim bremenom.
80 In its observation letters addressed to the Member States concerning the annual progress reports, the Commission has invited the authorities to speed up the process of quantification of the indicators. 
80 Komisija je v svojih dopisih s pripombami na letna poročila o napredku, naslovljenih na države članice, pozvala organe, naj pospešijo postopek količinske opredelitve kazalnikov.
Box 15 The fact that only a few hundred of persons live in a village in which a road is built does not give information on how many actually use it or might use it. 
Okvir 15 Na podlagi dejstva, da v vasi, kjer je zgrajena cesta, živi samo nekaj sto ljudi, ni jasno, koliko ljudi cesto dejansko uporablja ali bi jo lahko uporabljalo.
The double counting of the rural population for the aims of measure 322 (village renewal) was intended and is a result of the adopted methodology. 
Dvojno štetje prebivalstva na podeželju za namene ukrepa M322 (prenova vasi) je bilo načrtovano in je posledica sprejete metodologije.
83 There is no legal requirement for setting quantified targets for each individual projects. 
83 Za določanje količinsko opredeljenih ciljev za posamezne projekte ni pravne zahteve.
As shown in Annex II to the report, four out of five Polish projects had quantifiable results, while the only exception related to the cultural/sport infrastructure. 
Kot je prikazano v Prilogi II poročila, so imeli štirje od petih poljskih projektov merljive rezultate z izjemo kulturne/športne infrastrukture.
85 For 2014-2020 CMES, the new result indicator 'Change in agricultural output on supported farms/ annual work unit’ will be assessed by external evaluators in 2017 and 2019 and in the ex post evaluations. 
85 Novi kazalnik rezultatov „sprememba v kmetijski proizvodnji na podprtih kmetijah/letno delovno enoto“ v okviru skupnega sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CMES) 2014– 2020 bodo leta 2017 ocenili zunanji izvajalci vrednotenj, leta 2019 pa bo opravljeno naknadno vrednotenje.
The Commission considers that this frequency is appropriate taking into account the cost/benefit ratio of such evaluations. 
Komisija meni, da je glede na razmerje med stroški in koristmi takšna pogostost vrednotenja primerna.
86 The two 2014-2020 CMES indicators (the output and result indicators 'population benefiting from improved services/infrastructure') will complement each other. 
86 Dva kazalnika v okviru CMES 2014–2020 (kazalnika izložkov in rezultatov „prebivalstvo, ki ima koristi od izboljšanih storitev/infrastrukture“) se bosta med seboj dopolnjevala.
They will measure respectively the gross and the net number of population benefiting for the operations. 
Merila bosta bruto in neto število prebivalstva, ki bo imelo koristi od operacij.
87 The assessment of the effects of measures will be carried out against the programmes' objectives to which they contribute. 
87 Učinki ukrepov bodo ocenjeni glede na cilje programov, h katerim prispevajo.
This approach reflects a result orientation of the policy and enables the combined effects of measures against relevant objectives to be better assessed. 
Ta pristop izraža usmerjenost politike v rezultate in omogoča boljše reševanje skupnih učinkov ukrepov glede na ustrezne cilje.
Reply of the Commission 63 The Member States can define additional programme-specific indicators in relation to a set of key measures. 
Odgovori Komisije 63 Države članice lahko določijo dodatne kazalnike za posamezne programe glede na sklop ključnih ukrepov.
However, this should not be requested systematically for all measures for reasons of keeping the costs of monitoring and evaluation reasonable. 
Vendar se tega ne bi smelo sistematično zahtevati za vse ukrepe, da ostanejo stroški spremljanja in vrednotenja razumni.
Ex post evaluators will further investigate the performance of single measures/ sub-measures. 
Izvajalci naknadnega vrednotenja podrobneje preučijo uspešnost posameznih ukrepov/podukrepov.
Moreover, the indicators as defined in the legislation or by the Member States are only the starting point for an evaluation, The evaluators can collect additional information, for example through case studies. 
Poleg tega so kazalniki, opredeljeni v zakonodaji ali s strani držav članic, samo izhodiščna točka za vrednotenje. Izvajalci vrednotenja lahko zberejo dodatne informacije, npr. prek študij primerov.
88 The mid-term evaluation did provide a good overview of the implementation of RDPs. 
88 Vmesno vrednotenje je zagotovilo dober pregled nad izvajanjem programov razvoja podeželja.
However, for multiannual programmes such as RDPs certain results (e.g. gross value added) and impacts can only be properly assessed and measured after sufficient time since implementation has passed. 
Vendar je določene rezultate (npr. bruto dodano vrednost) in vplive pri večletnih programih, kot je program razvoja podeželja, mogoče pravilno oceniti šele po izteku določenega časa od izvedbe.
89 The 2014-2020 monitoring and evaluation system incorporates a number of improvements in comparison with the 2007-2013 CMEF: — Enhanced annual implementation reports (AIRs) incorporating evaluation findings will replace mid-term evaluations. 
89 Sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja za obdobje 2014– 2020 vključuje številne izboljšave v primerjavi s CMEF 2007–2013: – Vmesna vrednotenja bodo nadomestila razširjena letna poročila o izvajanju, ki vključujejo ugotovitve vrednotenja.
The first AIR in 2017 will concentrate on elements related to programme steering, while the second AIR in 2019 will provide an initial assessment of the impact of the RDPs. — The Member States will be required to carry out evaluation activities throughout the programming period in accordance with the evaluation plan included in the RDPs. — The assessment and reporting of the results and impacts of the policy will be linked more appropriately to the stage of implementation of the RDPs. 
Prvo letno poročilo o izvajanju leta 2017 bo osredotočeno na elemente, ki so povezani z usmerjanjem programa, drugo letno poročilo leta 2019 pa bo zagotovilo prvo oceno vpliva programov razvoja podeželja. – Države članice bodo morale med programskim obdobjem izvajati dejavnosti vrednotenja v skladu z načrtom vrednotenja, ki je vključen v programe razvoja podeželja. – Ocena in poročanje rezultatov ter vplivov politike bodo bolje povezani s stopnjo izvajanja programov razvoja podeželja.
Conclusions and recommendations 93 The Member States were encouraged to include in their RDPs the most important rural areas to be developed. 
Zaključki in priporočila 93 Države članice so bile pozvane, naj v svoje programe razvoja podeželja vključijo najpomembnejša območja podeželja, ki jih je treba razviti.
The EAFRD has permitted the funding of investments which otherwise might not have been funded. 
EKSPR je omogočil financiranje naložb, ki se drugače morda ne bi.
94 Sharing best practices can best be done ex post, since infrastructure investments are of a longer-term nature and their benefits will be shown at a later stage. 
94 Izmenjavo najboljših praks je najbolje opraviti naknadno, saj so infrastrukturne naložbe dolgoročnega značaja, njihove koristi pa se bodo pokazale pozneje.
However, lessons learnt from the previous programming period are reflected in the legislative framework for 2014-2020. 
Vendar zakonodajni okvir za obdobje 2014–2020 temelji na izkušnjah, pridobljenih v prejšnjem programskem obdobju.
The European Network for Rural Development promotes the sharing of good practices among Member States and regions. 
Evropska mreža za razvoj podeželja spodbuja izmenjavo dobrih praks med državami članicami in regijami.
96 Coordination was to be ensured at national and/or regional level. 
96 Usklajevanje je bilo treba zagotoviti na nacionalni in/ali regionalni ravni.
Often integrated approaches at regional and local level have been followed, aiming at optimising the EU co-funding. 
Pogosto so sledili celostni pristopi na regionalni in lokalni ravni, ki so bili namenjeni optimizaciji sofinanciranja EU.
97 The interventions under the RDPs are co-financed by the Commission and the Member States. 
97 Posredovanja prek programov razvoja podeželja sofinancirajo Komisija in države članice.
For the 2014-2020 programming period, the issue of complementarity and demarcation was raised in the RDPs. 
Odgovori Komisije 64 Za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 je bilo vprašanje dopolnjevanja in razmejitve obravnavano v programih razvoja podeželja.
Also, the so-called ‘Commission services’ position papers’ drawn up for each Member State provided guidance on the coordinated interventions of the ESIF. 
Poleg tega so se s t.i. dokumenti služb Komisije o stališčih, pripravljenimi za vsako državo članico, zagotovile smernice o usklajenih ukrepih skladov ESI.
The Member States have to ensure the complementarity, consistency and conformity with other EU instruments. 
Države članice morajo zagotoviti skladnost, usklajenost in dopolnjevanje z drugimi instrumenti EU.
Recommendation 1 (a) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 1 (a) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
Recommendation 1 (b) The Commission accepts the recommendation and has started to implement it. 
Priporočilo 1 (b) Komisija sprejema priporočilo in ga je začela izvajati.
The risk of deadweight has to be considered on a case-by-case basis, depending on the type of investments concerned and local investment conditions. 
Tveganje mrtvih izgub je treba obravnavati za vsak primer posebej glede na vrsto zadevnih naložb in lokalne pogoje za naložbe.
Exchange of best practices concerning the mitigation of the risk of deadweight will be promoted through the activities of the European Rural Development Network. 
Izmenjava najboljših praks, povezanih z zmanjšanjem tveganja mrtvih izgub, se bo spodbujala prek dejavnosti v okviru Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja.
Mechanisms to ensure better complementarities and coordination between funds have been reinforced in the 2014-2020 programming period through the partnership agreements, where the Member States have to describe the use of ESIF in order to ensure complementarity and synergies of activities. 
V programskem obdobju 2014–2020 so bili mehanizmi za zagotavljanje boljšega dopolnjevanja in usklajevanja okrepljeni prek partnerskih sporazumov, v katerih morajo države članice opisati uporabo skladov ESI, da se zagotovijo dopolnjevanje in sinergije dejavnosti.
The issue of complementarity and demarcation was also raised in the RDPs. 
Vprašanje dopolnjevanja in razmejitve je bilo obravnavano tudi v programih razvoja podeželja.
While the principle of additionality of RDP resources to national funds is addressed at programme level by applying the relevant co-financing rates, the Commission will continue to promote efficiency in rural development spending. 
Medtem ko se načelo dodane vrednosti, ki ga viri iz programa razvoja podeželja zagotavljajo nacionalnim sredstvom, uresničuje na ravni programov z uporabo ustreznih stopenj sofinanciranja, bo Komisija še naprej spodbujala učinkovitost porabe na področju razvoja podeželja.
Reply of the Commission 65 Recommendation 1 (c) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Odgovori Komisije 65 Priporočilo 1 (c) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
Recommendation 1 (d) The Commission accepts this recommendation and has started to implement it. 
Priporočilo 1 (d) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in ga je začela izvajati.
When establishing the legal framework for the 2014-2020 programming period, the Commission has taken the necessary steps to improve coordination between different funds as regards the support to rural infrastructures. 
Komisija je pri oblikovanju pravnega okvira za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 sprejela potrebne ukrepe za izboljšanje usklajevanja med različnimi skladi, ki so namenjeni podpori podeželske infrastrukture.
Coordination and complementarity of EU funds at the level of national/regional strategies is addressed by the different services of the Commission. 
Za usklajevanje in dopolnjevanje skladov EU na ravni nacionalnih/regionalnih strategij skrbijo različne službe Komisije.
It is however for national/regional authorities to enforce such coordination/complementarity at measure/ project levels when implementing the programmes. 
Nacionalni/regionalni organi pa morajo takšno usklajevanje/dopolnjevanje izvrševati na ravni ukrepov/projektov pri izvajanju programov.
The Commission will regularly monitor and assess implementation in the Member States within the established framework for monitoring and reporting. 
Komisija bo redno spremljala in ocenjevala izvajanje v državah članicah znotraj vzpostavljenega okvira za spremljanje in poročanje.
103 The Commission's audits have also identified weaknesses in the systems put in place in the Member States to assess the reasonableness of costs. 
103 Revizije Komisije so pokazale tudi slabosti v sistemih, ki so jih države članice vzpostavile za ocenjevanje razumnosti stroškov.
In some cases, financial corrections have been imposed. 
V nekaterih primerih so bili opravljeni finančni popravki.
The improvement of checks on the reasonableness of costs and public procurement is a priority for the Commission. 
Za Komisijo je ključnega pomena, da se izboljšajo pregledi glede razumnosti stroškov in javnih naročil.
Training related to these issues has been delivered for the managing authorities and paying agencies and specific guidance has been issued. 
Za organe upravljanja in plačilne agencije so bila organizirana usposabljanja, povezana s temi vprašanji, izdane pa so bile tudi posebne smernice.
As regards public procurement, an action plan for all ESI funds and specific guidance for practitioners, training courses and dedicated webpages are being developed. 
Kar zadeva javno naročanje, se oblikujejo akcijski načrt za vse sklade ESI, posebne smernice za izvajalce, usposabljanja in posebne spletne strani.
Public procurement is an ex ante conditionality for all ESI funds and where there is not enough assurance that procedures and institutions in place can manage EU funds in an effective and efficient way, respecting the legality of the transactions, payments to the Member States might be suspended. 
Javna naročila so predhodni pogoj, ki velja za vse sklade ESI, in če ni zadostnega zagotovila, da lahko vzpostavljeni postopki in institucije upravljajo sklade EU na uspešen in učinkovit način ter ob spoštovanju zakonitosti transakcij, se lahko plačila državam članicam prekinejo.
104 While requiring the submission of a maintenance plan may be considered as a good practice for certain investments, there is no legal obligation to do so. 
104 Čeprav zahteva za predložitev načrta vzdrževanja velja za dobro prakso pri nekaterih naložbah, za to ni pravne obveze.
105 While setting administrative deadlines may be considered as a good practice, there are no legal provisions that empower the Commission to force Member States to set such deadlines. 
105 Čeprav določanje upravnih rokov velja za dobro prakso, ne obstajajo pravne določbe, ki bi Komisijo pooblaščale, da od držav članic zahteva določitev teh rokov.
Recommendation 2 (a) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 2 (a) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
Recommendation 2 (b) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 2 (b) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission is implementing the recommendations made in Special Report No 22/2014 by delivering specific training for the managing authorities and paying agencies, enhanced assessment of the verifiability and controllability of the measures and promotion of the use of simplified cost options. 
Komisija priporočila iz posebnega poročila št. 22/2014 izvaja z zagotavljanjem posebnih usposabljanj za organe upravljanja in plačilne agencije, ustreznejšo oceno preverljivosti in možnostjo kontrole ukrepov ter spodbujanjem poenostavljenega obračunavanja stroškov.
Furthermore, the systems in place for ensuring that the costs of the projects are reasonable will be assessed in the framework of conformity audits. 
Poleg tega bodo sistemi, vzpostavljeni za zagotavljanje, da so stroški projektov razumni, ocenjeni v okviru revizij skladnosti.
Financial corrections will be applied in cases of non-compliance. 
V primerih neskladnosti se bodo uporabili finančni popravki.
Reply of the Commission 66 Recommendation 2 (c) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Odgovori Komisije 66 Priporočilo 2 (c) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
Recommendation 2 (d) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 2 (d) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 107 and 108 Information available through the monitoring and evaluation system was the best available at this stage, taking into account financial and practical limitations. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 107 in 108 Informacije, ki so bile na voljo prek sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja, so bile ob upoštevanju finančnih in praktičnih omejitev na tej stopnji najboljše razpoložljive.
The Commission has proposed a number of improvements to the monitoring and evaluation system for the 2014-2020 programming period, while considering the need to find a balance between the benefits of monitoring and evaluation and the costs and administrative burden related to it. 
Komisija je predlagala številne izboljšave sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja za programsko obdobje 2014–2020, hkrati pa je upoštevala potrebo, da se poišče ravnotežje med prednostmi, ki jih zagotavlja spremljanje in vrednotenje, ter s tem povezanimi stroški in upravnim bremenom.
109 The 2014-2020 monitoring and evaluation system incorporates a number of improvements. 
109 Sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja za obdobje 2014– 2020 vključuje številne izboljšave.
Enhanced annual implementation reports (AIRs) will be issued in 2017 and 2019, which will incorporate evaluation findings. 
Razširjena letna poročila o izvajanju bodo izdana leta 2017 in 2019, vključevala pa bodo ugotovitve vrednotenja.
The first report will concentrate on the programme steering and the second one on the assessment of the impact of the RDPs. 
Prvo poročilo bo osredotočeno na usmerjanje programa, drugo pa na oceno vpliva programov razvoja podeželja.
The Member States will be required to carry out evaluation activities throughout the programming period in accordance with the evaluation plan included in the RDPs. 
Države članice bodo morale med programskim obdobjem izvajati dejavnosti vrednotenja v skladu z načrtom vrednotenja, ki je vključen v programe razvoja podeželja.
The assessment and reporting on the results and impacts of the policy will be linked more appropriately to the stage of implementation. 
Ocena in poročanje rezultatov ter vplivov politike bodo bolje povezani s stopnjo izvajanja.
To further underpin the result orientation of the policy, its assessment against relevant policy objectives will be strengthened. 
Za nadaljnje spodbujanje usmerjenosti politike v rezultate, bo njeno ocenjevanje okrepljeno v skladu z ustreznimi cilji politike.
Recommendation 3 (a) The Commission accepts this recommendation. However, given the limited value of assessing measures in isolation, the Commission is of the opinion that evaluation should be carried out at the level of the focus areas, which reflect policy objectives. 
Priporočilo 3 (a) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo, ker pa ima ločeno ocenjevanje ukrepov omejeno vrednost, meni, da bi bilo treba vrednotenje izvajati na ravni prednostnih območij, ki izražajo cilje politike.
Moreover, the Commission stresses the importance of evaluation to interpret and analyse the data collected in order to draw conclusions on effectiveness or efficiency. 
Komisija poleg tega poudarja pomen vrednotenja za razlago in analizo zbranih podatkov, da se oblikujejo zaključki o učinkovitosti in uspešnosti.
Recommendation 3 (b) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 3 (b) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
The EU co-finances investments in rural infrastructure with the aim to improve competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sectors and increase the quality of life in rural areas. 
EU sofinancira naložbe v podeželsko infrastrukturo s ciljem krepitve konkurenčnosti kmetijskega in gozdarskega sektorja in izboljšanja kakovosti življenja na podeželskih območjih.
This audit examined whether the Member States and the European Commission have achieved value for money with the funds allocated. 
S to revizijo je bilo preučeno, ali so države članice in Evropska komisija z dodeljenimi sredstvi dosegle stroškovno učinkovitost.
The audit found that the need for EU rural development funding was not always clearly justified, coordination with other funds was weak and selection procedures did not systematically direct funding towards the most cost-effective projects. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da potrebe po financiranju EU za razvoj podeželja niso bile vedno jasno utemeljene, da je bilo usklajevanje z drugimi sredstvi slabo in da izbirni postopki niso sistematično usmerjali financiranja v stroškovno najučinkovitejše projekte.
The Commission and the Member States have not collected adequate information on the effectiveness or efficiency of the measures funded, making it difficult to direct future policy and manage the budget by results. 
Komisija in države članice niso zbrale ustreznih informacij o uspešnosti in učinkovitosti financiranih ukrepov, kar je oteževalo usmerjanje prihodnje politike in upravljanje proračuna na podlagi rezultatov.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 01 Is the Commission’s system for performance measurement in relation to farmers’ incomes well designed and based on sound data? 
št. 01 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Ali je sistem Komisije za merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja v zvezi z dohodki kmetov dobro zasnovan in temelji na zanesljivih podatkih?