natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
12) on 2016 Discharge procedure, chapter 5 “Competitiveness for growth and jobs”, p. 
12) o postopku razrešnice za leto 2016, poglavje 5 – Konkurenčnost za rast in delovna mesta, str.
Opinion European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) on Mid-term evaluation Horizon 2020, section 5.1 and 5.4 (INT/792), paragraphs 5.1 and 5.4. 
Mnenje Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora o vmesnem pregledu programa Obzorje 2020, odstavka 5.1 in 5.4 (INT/792).
Operational conclusions of the Commission’s Corporate Management Board (CMB) meeting of 26/10/2016. 73 74 75 76 77 78 
73 74 75 76 77 78 Operativni sklepi, sprejeti na sestanku internega upravnega odbora Komisije 26.10.2016.
However, in the context of the inherent dilemmas described in this briefing paper, simplification remains difficult in the following areas: - the basic regulations remain difficult to comprehend for participants, especially those who are less familiar with the rules, such as SMEs (paragraphs 11 to 16 and 30; - the implementation of simpler funding options remains difficult for the beneficiaries (e.g. need to adapt their cost-accounting practices), as well as the control of them by the auditors (e.g. lack of audit evidence); besides, there is no robust evidence to prove a link between simplification efforts and the quantifiable error rate, yet (paragraphs 27 to 30 and boxes 3 and 4); - the success rate for applications has fallen in successive research programmes; EU - 13 Member States are lagging behind EU - 15 Member States (paragraphs 33 and table 4). 
Zaradi inherentnih dilem, opisanih v tem kratkem poročilu, pa je poenostavitev še vedno težka na naslednjih področjih: - udeleženci, zlasti tisti, ki slabše poznajo pravila, kot so mala in srednja podjetja, še vedno težko razumejo temeljne predpise (odstavki 11 do 16 in 30); - udeleženci še vedno težko uporabljajo poenostavljeno obračunavanje stroškov (npr. zaradi potrebe po prilagoditvi njihovih praks stroškovnega računovodstva), revizorji pa ga težko kontrolirajo (npr. zaradi pomanjkanja revizijskih dokazov). Poleg tega zaenkrat ni trdnih dokazov za povezavo med prizadevanji za poenostavitev in stopnjo količinsko opredeljivih napak (odstavki 27 do 30 in okvira 3 in 4); - stopnja uspešnosti predlogov projektov se je v vsakem naslednjem programu za raziskave zniževala. Države članice EU-13 zaostajajo za državami članicami EU-15 (odstavek 33 in tabela 4).
According to the High Level Group on research programmes79: “Horizon 2020 has achieved remarkable simplification” and the advice is to “simplify further”80. Our audit experience with regard to simplification shows the need to follow the line of reducing the burden for beneficiaries, aligning rules with their usual practices recognised by national funders, optimising the Commision’s management processes, and adopting a more risk-driven approach for control activities, where justified81. 
Po mnenju skupine za raziskovalne programe na visoki ravni79 so bile v programu Obzorje 2020 uvedene izjemne poenostavitve, skupina pa svetuje, naj se poenostavljanje nadaljuje.80 Revizijske izkušnje Sodišča v zvezi s poenostavitvijo kažejo, da bi bilo treba zmanjšati breme za upravičence, uskladiti pravila z njihovimi običajnimi praksami, ki jih priznavajo nacionalni financerji, optimizirati upravljavske procese Komisije in sprejeti pristop k dejavnostim kontrole, ki bi bil bolj usmerjen v tveganje, kadar je to upravičeno.81 Poleg tega Sodišče priporoča, da se zaradi zmanjšanja pravne negotovosti bolj upoštevajo možnosti Neodvisna skupina na visoki ravni za maksimiranje učinka programov EU za raziskave in inovacije je objavila poročilo LAP-FAB-APP (julij 2017).
LAB – FAB – APP – Investing in the European future we want, European Commission, DG RTD, July 2017, p. 
LAB – FAB – APP – Investing in the European future we want, Evropska komisija, GD za raziskave in inovacije, julij 2017, str.
18 and p. 
18 in str.
6 (recommendation 7). 
6 (priporočilo 7).
ECA, Special Report No 2/2013. 
2/2013.
Proposals for simplification beyond Horizon 2020 42. Our analysis shows that attention is needed in the following areas, taking into account our prior special reports and opinions: Proposal 1 (stability and change) – the need to provide a reasonable timespan between adoption and implementation of legal acts83 84 • the relevant actors like the Commission and beneficiaries need sufficient time to adjust to new legal framework, based on the principles of good administration (paragraphs 4, 11 and 20 to 22). 
Analiza Sodišča ter ugotovitve iz prejšnjih posebnih poročil in mnenj kažejo, da je treba pozornost posvetiti naslednjim zadevam: Predlog 1 (stabilnost in spremembe) – potreba po zagotovitvi razumnega časa med sprejetjem in izvajanjem zakonodajnih aktov8384 • Zadevni akterji, kot so Komisija in upravičenci, potrebujejo dovolj časa, da se prilagodijo na nov pravni okvir, kar je v skladu z načeli dobrega upravljanja (odstavki 4, 11 in 20 do 22).
Proposal 2 (accountability and ownership) – the need to assess the further use of simplified cost options such as lump sum project funding and prizes 85 86 87 • the further use of simplified cost options should be assessed in order to encourage wider participation from all types of beneficiary groups (such as SMEs and new entrants), based on more appropriate performance criteria(paragraphs 5 and 24 to 26). 
Predlog 2 (odgovornost in občutek lastništva) – potreba po oceni nadaljnjih koristi uporabe poenostavljenega obračunavanja stroškov, kot sta financiranje projektov v pavšalnih zneskih in nagrade858687 • Zaradi spodbujanja širšega sodelovanja upravičencev iz vseh skupin (kot so mala in srednja podjetja ter novi udeleženci) bi bilo treba na podlagi ustreznejših meril za Evropsko računsko sodišče, Letno poročilo za leto 2016, odstavek 5.31.
Special Report No 2/2017: The Commission’s negotiation of 2014-2020 Partnership Agreements and programmes in Cohesion, executive summary paragraph X, figure 3, paragraphs 36 to 37, paragraphs 138 to 139, recommendation 1. 
Posebno poročilo št. 2/2017 – Pogajanja Komisije o partnerskih sporazumih in programih na področju kohezije za obdobje 2014–2020, Povzetek, odstavek X, slika 3, odstavka 36 in 37, odstavka 138 in 139, priporočilo 1.
Special report No 1/2004: on the management of indirect RTD actions under the fifth framework programme (FP5) for research and technological development (1998 to 2002), together with the Commission’s replies (2004/C 99/01), summary VI. 
Posebno poročilo št. 1/2004 o upravljanju posrednih dejavnosti RTR v sklopu 5. okvirnega programa (5. OP) za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (1998–2002) z odgovori Komisije (2004/C 99/01), povzetek VI.
2016 Annual Report, paragraph 5.31, recommendation 1. 
Letno poročilo za leto 2016, odstavek 5.31, priporočilo 1.
Special report No 2/2013 “Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research?”, recommendation 5. 
Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?, priporočilo 5.
Opinion No 6/2012 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules for the participation and dissemination in ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’, summary XI prizes, paragraph 36. 
Mnenje št. 6/2012 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravilih za sodelovanje v okvirnem programu za raziskave in inovacije Obzorje 2020 ter razširjanje njegovih rezultatov (2014–2020), Povzetek XI – nagrade, odstavek 36.
27 83 84 85 86 87 
82 83 84 85 86 87
Proposal 3 (legal certainty and discretion) – the need to explain the use of guidelines as non-binding rules88 • the application of interfaces, such as guidelines, as supplementary to legal regulations should not hinder the discretion for individual practices (paragraphs 6 to 7 and 11 to 16). 
Predlog 3 (pravna gotovost in prosta presoja) – potreba po pojasnitvi uporabe smernic kot nezavezujočih pravil88 • Uporaba vmesnikov, npr. smernic, kot dodatka k zakonskim predpisom ne bi smela ovirati proste presoje za posamezne prakse (odstavki 6 in 7 ter 11 do 16).
Proposal 4 (beneficiaries’ interest and EU interest) – the need to further align programme provisions with beneficiaries’ accounting practices89 • the acceptance of beneficiaries’ accounting practices needs to be furthered in line with the new Financial Regulation, and where justified, it needs to be based on the work of others, such as certification by competent national authorities. (paragraphs 8 and 27 to 28). 
Predlog 4 (interesi upravičencev in interesi EU) – potreba po dodatnem usklajevanju programskih določb z računovodskimi praksami upravičencev89 • Treba je spodbujati sprejetje računovodskih praks upravičencev v skladu z novo finančno uredbo. Kadar je to upravičeno, bi moralo temeljiti na delu drugih, kot je potrjevanje, ki ga opravijo nacionalni organi (odstavki 8, 27 in 28).
Proposal 5 (Regional spread and excellence) – the need to recognise validated good research proposals under Horizon 2020 in other European and national programmes following a proper coordination mechanism90 91 92 • the evaluation and selection of good research proposals for Horizon 2020 needs to be recognised within other EU policies, such as cohesion policy, in order to avoid unnessary Special Report No 2/2013 “Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the Seventh Framework Programme for research?” summary III, paragraphs 26, 31 and 34. 
Predlog 5 (regionalna porazdelitev in odličnost) – potreba po dajanju priznanj preverjenim predlogom raziskav za program Obzorje 2020 v drugih evropskih in nacionalnih programih na podlagi ustreznih mehanizmov usklajevanja909192 • Vrednotenje in izbiro dobrih predlogov raziskav za program Obzorje 2020 je treba priznavati na drugih področjih EU, kot je kohezijska politika, zaradi izognitve nepotrebnemu podvajanju dela različnih služb Komisije v skladu s pristopom po načelu Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?, Povzetek III, odstavki 26, 31 in 34.
Special Report No 2/2013 “Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the Seventh Framework Programme for research?” summary VI (a) paragraphs 21 to 22, recommendation 1. 
2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?, Povzetek VI(a), odstavka 21 in 22 ter priporočilo 1.
Special Report No 2/2013 “Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the Seventh Framework Programme for research?” summary VI (b) and (c), figure 5, paragraphs 31 to 34, recommendations 2, 3 and 4. 
Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?, Povzetek VI(b) in (c), slika 5, odstavki 31 do 34 ter priporočila 2, 3 in 4.
Special Report No 2/2010 “The effectiveness of the Design Studies and Construction of New Infrastructures support schemes under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research”, recommendation 2. 
Posebno poročilo št. 2/2010 – Uspešnost podpornih shem za načrtovalne študije in izgradnjo novih infrastruktur v okviru šestega okvirnega programa za raziskave, priporočilo 2.
Opinion No 6/2012 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules for the participation and dissemination in ‘Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’, introduction paragraph 2, summary II and paragraph 9. 
Mnenje št. 6/2012 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravilih za sodelovanje v okvirnem programu za raziskave in inovacije Obzorje 2020 ter razširjanje njegovih rezultatov (2014–2020), Uvod, odstavek 2, Povzetek II in odstavek 9.
28 88 89 90 91 92 
28 88 89 90 91 92
duplication of work among Commission services in line with the one-stop-shop approach, and to ensure overall process efficiency in the allocation of EU funds(paragraphs 9, 33, 35 and 37). 
vse na enem mestu in zaradi zagotavljanja skupne učinkovitosti procesov pri dodeljevanju sredstev EU (odstavki 9, 33, 35 in 37).
List of workshops and conferences attended by ECA staff 1. 
PRILOGA II Seznam delavnic in konferenc, ki so se jih udeležili sodelavci Evropskega računskega sodišča 1.
Workshop “Experiences from practice with final beneficiaries from European Framework programmes for research and innovation FP7/Horizon 2020”, 9 February 2015, Brussels. 2. 
Delavnica z naslovom Experiences from practice with final beneficiaries from European Framework programmes for research and innovation FP7/Horizon 2020, 9. februar 2015, Bruselj 2.
Symposium “Auditing is listening” Audit principles and audit standards: their origins, connections and consequences, 2 July 2015, ECA, Luxembourg. 3. 
Simpozij z naslovom Auditing is listening – Audit principles and audit standards: their origins, connections and consequences, 2. julij 2015, Evropsko računsko sodišče, Luxembourg 3.
Discharge Commissioner Carlos Moedas - Research, Science and Innovation in the presence of Mr Brenninkmeijer, 2014 Annual Report, 3 December 2015, Brussels. 
Evropski komisar za raziskave, znanost in inovacije Carlos Moedas v prisotnosti A. Brenninkmeijerja, Letno poročilo za leto 2014, 3. december 2015, Bruselj.
ECA workshop, Theoretical framework on Legal Uncertainty on Final beneficiaries of EU subsidies, 11 March 2016, Brussels. 
Delavnica Evropskega računskega sodišča z naslovom Theoretical framework on Legal Uncertainty on Final beneficiaries of EU subsidies, 11. marec 2016, Bruselj.
Presentation ECA’s Special Report on the EIT, Brussels, 21 April 2016, EP, Brussels. 
Predstavitev posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča o Evropskem inštitutu za inovacije in tehnologijo, 21. april 2016, Bruselj.
ITRE - Exchange of views on ECA Annual Report 2015, 10 November 2016, Brussels. 
ITRE – Izmenjava mnenj o Letnem poročilu Evropskega računskega sodišča za leto 2015, 10. november 2016, Bruselj.
ITRE Working Group on Horizon 2020: "Simplification and Accounting system: flat rate vs. full costs / cooperation with the European Court of Auditors", 8 December 2016, Brussels. 
Delovna skupina ITRE za program Obzorje 2020, Simplification and Accounting system: flat rate vs. full costs / cooperation with the European Court of Auditors, 8. december 2016, Bruselj.
EP-CONT, Exchange of views with Commissioner Carlos Moedas, responsible for Research, Science and Innovation, in the presence of the Member of the European Court of Auditors responsible, Alex Brenninkmeijer, Brussels, 2015 Annual Report, 24 January 2017, Brussels. 
Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor, izmenjava mnenj s komisarjem za raziskave, znanost in inovacije Carlosom Moedasom v prisotnosti člana Evropskega računskega sodišča A. Brenninkmeijerja, Letno poročilo za leto 2015, 24. januar 2017, Bruselj.
Informal dialogue between IDEA-league, the European Commission and European Court of Auditors, 28 March 2017, Brussels. 
Neformalni dialog med IDEA-league, Evropsko komisijo in Evropskim računskim sodiščem, 28. marec 2017, Bruselj.
Discussion with IGLO, “Research funding and ECA’s 2016 Annual Report”, 7 June 2017, Brussels. 
Razprava z IGLO o financiranju raziskav in Letnem poročilu Evropskega računskega sodišča za leto 2016, 7. junij 2017, Bruselj.
Informal stakeholder meeting on simplification of the future Framework Programme (FP9), European University Association (EUA), 11 October 2017, Brussels. 
Neformalno srečanje deležnikov o poenostavitvi naslednjega (9.) okvirnega programa, Zveza evropskih univerz, 11. oktober 2017, Bruselj.
EARTO Policy Event,. “Towards FP9: Maximising R&I Impact to Ensure Europe's Position as Global Player”, 11 October 2017, Brussels. 
Dogodek EARTO z naslovom Towards FP9: Maximising R&I Impact to Ensure Europe's Position as Global Player, 11. oktober 2017, Bruselj.
EP-CONT, Exchange of views with Commissioner Carlos Moedas, responsible for Research, Science and Innovation, in the presence of the Member of the European Court of Auditors responsible, Alex Brenninkmeijer, 2016 Annual Report, 19 October 2017, Brussels. 
Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor, izmenjava mnenj s komisarjem za raziskave, znanost in inovacije Carlosom Moedasom v prisotnosti člana Evropskega računskega sodišča A. Brenninkmeijerja, Letno poročilo za leto 2016, 19. oktober 2017, Bruselj.
Stakeholder’s workshop on further simplification of implementation of R&I Framework Programmes, 20 October 2017, Brussels. 
Delavnica deležnikov o dodatni poenostavitvi izvajanja okvirnih programov za raziskave in inovacije, 20. oktober 2017, Bruselj.
FP5-FP6 ANNEX III 1 Overview of significant simplifications introduced since FP51 ‒ Introduction of the online Electronic Proposal Submission Service (EPSS) for the submission of proposal and development of electronic tools ‒ Introduction of audit certificates ‒ Introduction of the collective financial responsibility of project partners ‒ Adoption of an Action Plan on Rationalisation and Acceleration whose main actions were: diminution of the time to contract, clarification of the rules, improvement of information, improvement of internal management FP6-FP7 ‒ Clarification of the legal framework with the adoption of a general grant agreement instead of a general contract ‒ Reduction of the reporting burden by an increase of the standard duration of project reporting periods (18 instead of 12 months) ‒ Extension of the two stages submission of project proposals Funding model ‒ Abolition of the “additional cost” model (that did not allow universities to charge personnel costs for permanent staff) ‒ Adoption of a “simplified method” for the calculation of indirect costs for beneficiaries which do not have a full cost accounting system ‒ Lump sum for International Cooperation Partner Countries (ICPC) countries Audits & Controls ‒ Introduction of ex-ante certification on costing methodology for average personnel costs (CoMAv) ‒ Improvements to the system of audit certificates (agreed upon procedures for the certifying auditors and introduction of the “Certificate on Financial Statements (CFS)) 1 ECA, based on Commission (February 2018). 
1 2
‒ Substantial reduction in the number of CFS by introducing a minimum threshold (€375 000) requirement for a CFS ‒ Adoption of guidelines for checking the financial viability of applicants – providing for equal treatment and increased legal certainty. Creation of a URF (unique registration facility) to permit participants to submit their basic legal, administrative and financial information only once. 
1 2
2 
1 2
EN 2019 Challenges to effective EU cybersecurity policy Briefing Paper March 2019 
SL 2019 Izzivi za uspešno politiko EU za kibernetsko varnost Informativni dokument Marec 2019
About the paper: The objective of this briefing paper, which is not an audit report, is to provide an overview of the EU’s complex cybersecurity policy landscape and identify the main challenges to effective policy delivery. 
O dokumentu: Namen tega informativnega dokumenta, ki ni revizijsko poročilo, je zagotovitev pregleda kompleksne politike EU za kibernetsko varnost ter opredelitev glavnih izzivov za uspešno izvajanje te politike.
It covers network and information security, cybercrime, cyber defence and disinformation. 
V dokumentu so obravnavane varnost omrežij in informacijskih sistemov, kibernetska kriminaliteta, kibernetska obramba in dezinformacije.
The paper will also inform any future audit work in this area. 
Poleg tega bo dokument podlaga za morebitne prihodnje revizije tega področja.
We based our analysis on a documentary review of publicly available information in official documents, position papers and third party studies. 
Analiza Sodišča temelji na dokumentacijskem pregledu javno dostopnih informacij v uradnih dokumentih, dokumentov o stališču in študij tretjih oseb.
Our field work was carried out between April and September 2018, and developments up to December 2018 are taken into account. 
Delo na terenu je potekalo med aprilom in septembrom 2018, v dokumentu pa je upoštevan razvoj do decembra 2018.
We complemented our work by a survey of the Member States’ national audit offices, and through interviews with key stakeholders from EU institutions and representatives from the private sector. 
To delo dopolnjujejo anketa nacionalnih revizijskih uradov držav članic ter razgovori s ključnimi deležniki iz institucij EU in predstavniki zasebnega s ektorja.
The challenges we identified are grouped into four broad clusters: i) the policy framework; ii) funding and spending; iii) building cyber-resilience; iv) responding effectively to cyber incidents. 
Opredeljeni izzivi so razvrščeni v štiri široke skupine: i) okvir politike; ii) financiranje in poraba; iii) izgradnja kibernetske odpornosti; iv) uspešno odzivanje na kibernetske incidente.
Achieving a greater level of cybersecurity in the EU remains an imperative test. 
Doseganje višje ravni kibernetske varnosti v EU ostaja nujno.
We therefore end each chapter with a series of ideas for further reflection by policy-makers, legislators and practitioners. 
Zato Sodišče na koncu vsakega poglavja navaja vrsto zamisli za prihodnji razmislek oblikovalcev politik, zakonodajalcev in strokovnjakov.
We would like to acknowledge the constructive feedback received from the services of the Commission, the European External Action Service, the Council of the European Union, ENISA, Europol, the European Cybersecurity Organisation, and national audit offices of the Member States. 
Sodišče se zahvaljuje službam Komisije, Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje, Svetu Evropske unije, ENISI, Europolu, Evropski organizaciji za kibernetsko varnost in nacionalnim revizijskim uradom držav članic za konstruktivne povratne informacije.
Contents Executive summary Introduction What is cybersecurity? 
Vsebina Povze tek Uvod Kaj je kibernetska varnost?
How serious is the problem? 
Kako resen je problem?