natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, DG AGRI does not check if certification bodies' reports follow up previously detected observations, even if they were identified as part of the Commission's conformity clearance procedure. 
Vendar GD AGRI ne preverja, ali se v poročilih certifikacijskih organov spremljajo prejšnja opažanja, čeprav so bila opredeljena kot del postopka potrditve skladno­ sti, ki ga izvaja Komisija.
Currently, the Commission guidelines do not specify that certification bodies should include in their audit strategy and report information from other sources such as previous audits by the Commission or the Court. 
Trenutno v smernicah Komisije ni določeno, da bi morali certifikacijski organi v svojo revizijsko strategijo in poročilo zajeti informacije iz drugih virov, kot so prejšnje revizije Komisije ali Sodišča.
Therefore, the certification bodies do not have to assess either the risk of previously detected observations or their financial implications or if the paying agencies have remedied these findings. of the European Union T H E 4.36. 
Zato certifikacijskim organom ni treba oceniti niti tveganja, ugotovljenega v prejš­ njih opažanjih, niti finančnih posledic teh opažanj niti ali so plačilne agencije po teh ugotovitvah sprejele popravne ukrepe.
Therefore the Commission considers that EU auditors' findings, irre­ spective of whether they come from the Court of auditors or the Commission audit services, might be a very valuable source of information for the certification bodies to understand and evaluate the paying agencies' internal control systems. 
Zato je Komisija mnenja, da so ugotovitve revizorjev EU, ne glede na to, ali so jih oblikovali Računsko sodišče ali revizijske službe Komisije, lahko zelo dragocen vir informacij za certifikacijske organe, na podlagi katerih bodo ti razumeli in vrednotili sisteme notranje kontrole plačilnih agencij.
The certification bodies are reminded of the relevance to consider such findings in the certifi­ cation bodies' expert group meeting. 4.37. 
Komisija certifikacijske organe opozarja na to, kako pomembno je, da tovrstne ugotovitve obravnavajo na srečanju strokovne skupine certifikacijskih organov.
The certification bodies have to report on the paying agency's follow-up of their previous own findings, be it financial errors or recommendations to address systems weaknesses. 
4.37 Certifikacijski organi morajo poročati o tem, kako so plačilne agencije spremljale prejšnje ugotovitve teh organov, ki so se nanašale na finančne napake ali vsebovale priporočila za obravnavo sistemskih slabosti.
When reviewing the certification bodies' reports, the Commission system­ atically ensures that the certification bodies adequately address the follow-up of their own findings from previous years. 
Pri pregledu poročil certifikacijskih organov Komisija siste­ matično zagotovi, da certifikacijski organi ustrezno spremljajo lastne ugotovitve iz prejšnjih let.
For what concerns other auditors' findings, the Commission considers that these might be a useful source of information to be considered by the certification body when planning its audit strategy (see reply to paragraph 4.36). 
Kar zadeva ugotovitve drugih revizorjev, je Komisija mnenja, da so te ugotovitve lahko koristen vir informacij za certifikacijske organe, kadar ti načrtujejo svoje revizijske strategije (glej odgovor na odstavek 4.36 zgoraj).
It is however not in the certification bodies' mandate to report system­ atically in detail on the follow-up of the Commission, Court of auditors or any other external audit body's finding. 
Vendar pa ni v pristojnosti certifikacijskih organov, da sistematično in podrobno poročajo o spremljanju ugotovitev Komisije, Računskega sodišča ali katerega koli drugega zunanjega revizijskega organa.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/109 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 4.38. The Court also reviewed the work done by the certifi­ cation body concerning EAFRD in the Member State (Denmark) where it had identified the most serious weaknesses in the supervisory and control systems. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/109 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 4.38 Sodišče je prav tako pregledalo delo, ki ga je certifika­ cijski organ za EKSRP opravil v državi članici (Danska), kjer je odkrilo največje slabosti v nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemih.
The Court found that this certification body: (a) was not fully independent as legally required, as the firm which carried out the certification work was also involved in pre-payment eligibility checks in 35 % of the 65 files audited; (b) relied to a significant extent on the work carried out by the internal audit unit of the paying agency, without documen­ tation showing that this work was sufficiently reviewed; (c) had not sufficiently checked that the expenditure complied with all eligibility conditions. 
Sodišče je za ta certifikacijski organ ugotovilo: (a) da v nasprotju s pravnimi zahtevami ni bil povsem neod­ visen, saj je podjetje, ki je izvajalo certifikacijsko delo, sodelovalo tudi pri preverjanju upravičenosti pred plačilom pri 35 % od 65 revidiranih dosjejev; (b) da se je v precejšnjem obsegu opiral na delo, ki ga je opravila enota plačilne agencije za notranjo revizijo, ne da bi bilo iz dokumentacije razvidno, da je bilo to delo dovolj pregledano; (c) da ni dovolj preverjal, ali so odhodki skladni z vsemi pogoji za upravičenost.
In seven of 11 files selected which had been checked by the certification body, the Court identified ineligible expenditure representing 8 % of the EAFRD amount checked. 4.39. 
V sedmih od 11 izbranih dosjejev, ki jih je preveril certifikacijski organ, je Sodišče odkrilo neupravičene odhodke, ki so predstavljali 8 % preverjenega zneska za EKSRP.
The second stage of the clearance of accounts procedure is based on audits performed by the Commission. 
4.39 Druga stopnja postopka potrditve obračunov temelji na revizijah, ki jih je opravila Komisija.
The Court reviewed all 27 audits carried out by DG AGRI in 2011 for EAFRD and found that these audits were generally a sufficient basis for the conformity clearance procedure subject to the weaknesses reported below. 
Sodišče je pregledalo vseh 27 revizij, ki jih je izvedel GD AGRI v letu 2011 za EKSRP, in ugotovilo, da so bile, ob upoštevanju v nadaljevanju navedenih slabosti, te revizije na splošno zadostna podlaga za postopek potrditve obračunov.
In its audits, the Commission found similar weaknesses as reported by the Court, e.g. concerning a lack of verification of the reason­ ableness of costs, public procurement and eligibility of expen­ diture. 
Komisija je pri svojih revizijah odkrila podobne slabosti, kot jih odkriva Sodišče, npr. v zvezi s pomanjkanjem preverjanja razumnosti stroškov, javnim naro­ čanjem in upravičenostjo odhodkov.
Samples are selected on a judge­ mental or random basis, and cover expenditure relating to several budgetary years. 
Vzorci se izberejo na podlagi presoje ali naključno in zajemajo odhodke, ki se nanašajo na več proračunskih let.
The Commission's audit work is thus not intended to calculate an annual error rate. 
Revizijsko delo Komi­ sije tako ni namenjeno izračunavanju letne stopnje napake.
4.41. TheCourtfoundthattheCommissiondidnotalways have adequate records of the checks carried out. 
4.41 Sodišče je ugotovilo, da Komisija ni imela vedno ustreznih evidenc o izvedenih pregledih.
For instance, no standardised checklists were used for the 11 audits carried out for non-area-related measures. 
Pri 11 revizijah ukre­ pov, ki niso vezani na površino, se na primer niso uporabljali nobeni standardizirani kontrolni seznami.
In addition, the audit work was generally not reviewed by an independent party. 
Poleg tega revizij­ skega dela na splošno ni pregledala neodvisna stran.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 4.38. (a) and (b) In the framework of the financial clearance procedure, the Commission will follow up the issue with the Danish auth­ orities, notably with a view to reinforcing the operational inde­ pendence of the certification body. (c) The work that the certification bodies have to do in relation to the financial clearance procedure is mostly aimed at checking that the accounts are complete, accurate and true. 4.40. See joint replies to paragraphs 1.12 and 1.13. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 4.38 (a) in (b) V okviru postopka potrditve obračunov bo Komisija spremljala nastali položaj v sodelovanju z danskimi organi, zlasti z namenom, da bi okrepila operativno neodvisnost certifikacij­ skega organa. (c) Delo, ki ga morajo certifikacijski organi opraviti v povezavi s postopkom potrditve obračunov, je večinoma usmerjeno k prever­ janju, ali je zaključni račun popoln, točen in verodostojen. 4.40 Glej skupni odgovor na odstavka 1.12 in 1.13.
4.41. The Commission has adequate records of the checks carried out, although not in a standardised form in all cases. 
4.41 Komisija ima ustrezne evidence o izvedenih pregledih, čeprav v vseh primerih te evidence nimajo standardizirane oblike.
This is due to measures being very heterogeneous and, in addition, implemented by Member States in very different ways. 
Razlog za to je precejšnja heterogenost ukrepov, poleg tega države članice ukrepe izvajajo na zelo različne načine.
The Commission services will consider using suitable standardised checklists in all cases. 
Službe Komisije bodo preučile uporabnost ustreznih standardiziranih kontrolnih seznamov v vseh primerih.
All audit findings and the resulting reports are reviewed and approved by team leaders and head of unit before being finalised. 
Vse revizijske ugotovitve in poročila na podlagi teh ugotovitev pred končno potrditvijo pregledajo in odobrijo vodje skupin in vodja enote.
EN C 344/110 Official Journal T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S DG AGRI's management representation — the Annual Activity Report (AAR) 4.42. DG AGRI's AAR contains a reservation for the total EAFRD expenditure for 2011 (11,8 billion euro) with a total residual amount at risk of 278 million euro (20). The Court considers that, in principle, this reservation corroborates the Court's observations on substantive testing and systems audit as presented above. 
SL C 344/110 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 12.11.2012 Poslovodska predstavitev GD AGRI – letno poročilo o dejavnostih 4.42 Letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD AGRI vsebuje pridržek za odhodke EKSRP za leto 2011 kot celoto (11,8 milijarde EUR), pri čemer je skupni preostali tvegani znesek 278 milijonov EUR (20). Sodišče meni, da ta pridržek načeloma potrjuje opažanja Sodišča o preizkušanju podatkov in reviziji sistemov, kot so predstavljena zgoraj.
4.43. DGAGRI'smainargumentforincludingareservation for EAFRD is because the residual error rate reported by DG AGRI of 2,36 % is above the 2 % materiality threshold. 
4.43 GlavniargumentGDAGRIzauvedbopridržkaza EKSRP je, da je stopnja preostale napake v višini 2,36 %, o kateri je poročal GD AGRI, nad 2-odstotnim pragom pomembnosti.
The Court noted that DG AGRI in its AAR (21): — does not analyse nor explain why the residual error rate for EAFRD reported by DG AGRI has ‘increased significantly compared to the previous year’; of the European Union T H E 4.43. 12.11.2012 — reports that it has put in place a plan with corrective actions envisaged to address the situation. 
Sodišče je opazilo, da GD AGRI v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih (21): — ne analizira in ne pojasni, zakaj se je stopnja preostale napake za EKSRP, o kateri je poročal (GD AGRI), precej povišala v primerjavi z lanskim letom, 4.43 — poroča, da je uvedel načrt popravnih ukrepov za izboljšanje razmer.
4.44. The Court notes in addition that the error rate reported by DG AGRI is based on figures reported by the Member States for 2010. 
4.44 Sodišče poleg tega opaža, da stopnja napake, o kateri je poročal GD AGRI, temelji na podatkih, ki so jih sporočile države članice za leto 2010.
One of the reasons why the Court has identified a much higher error rate than the one reported by DG AGRI is that as part of its audit the Court found that Member States do not detect and report all non-eligible expen­ diture due to weaknesses in the administrative and the on-the-spot checks of the paying agency, as illustrated in example 4.2, example 4.5 and analysed in paragraphs 4.24, 4.28, 4.29 and 4.39. — The higher error rate for rural development measures, as compared to measures under the first pillar of the CAP financed by the EAGF, is mainly due to the fact that support for certain of these measures such as, for example, agri-environ­ mental measure is subject to a high number of conditions often of a very specific nature, which may increase the risk of errors by the beneficiaries and may render the controls by the national auth­ orities more difficult. 
Eden od razlogov, da je Sodišče odkrilo veliko višjo stopnjo napake kot GD AGRI, je, da je med svojo revizijo ugotovilo, da države članice ne odkrijejo in sporočijo vseh neupravičenih odhodkov zaradi slabosti v admi­ nistrativnih pregledih in pregledih na kraju samem, ki jih izva­ jajo plačilne agencije, kot je prikazano v primerih 4.2 in 4.5 ter analizirano v odstavkih 4.24, 4.28, 4.29 in 4.39. — Višja stopnja napake v primeru ukrepov za razvoj podeželja v primerjavi z ukrepi v okviru prvega stebra SKP, ki ga financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad, je v glavnem posledica dejstva, da je za podporo za nekatere od teh ukrepov, kot je na primer ukrep za kmetijstvo in okolje, treba izpolniti mnoge pogoje, ki so pogosto zelo specifični, kar lahko pri upravičencih poveča tveganje napak in oteži opravljanje kontrol nacionalnih organov.
As a consequence of the reservation on rural development expen­ diture made by the Director-General of DG AGRI in his declaration of assurance in the Annual Activity Report 2011, the Commission services have started in cooperation with the Member States (June 2012), an in depth analysis of the situation in order to diagnose the underlying reasons for the higher error rates and determine specific corrective actions. 
Na podlagi pridržka o odhodkih za razvoj podeželja, ki ga je generalni direktor GD AGRI izrazil v svoji izjavi o zanesljivosti v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2011, so službe Komisije v sodelovanju z državami članicami junija 2012 začele opravljati podrobno analizo položaja, da bi odkrile razloge za višje stopnje napake in določile specifične popravne ukrepe.
4.44. In order to address the risk that the error rates derived from these control statistics could have been understated due to inaccuracies in the databases or inadequate follow-up of anomalies, as referred to by the Court, DG AGRI applied a safety margin of 25 % when calculating the residual risk to the Fund. 
4.44 Zaradi morebitnega tveganja, da bi bile stopnje napake, ki izhajajo iz teh kontrolnih statističnih podatkov, podcenjene zaradi netočnosti podatkovnih zbirk ali nezadostnega spremljanja nepravil­ nosti, kot navaja Sodišče, je GD AGRI pri izračunu preostalega tveganja za sklad uporabil pribitek v višini 25 %.
The Commission considers this largely sufficient to cover the risks referred to by the Court. 
Komisija je mnenja, da je ta pribitek dovolj velik za kritje tveganj, na katera opozarja Sodišče.
It should also be noted that the Member States' control statistics are verified and validated to a large extent by the certification bodies, as recommended as an option by the Court in its Annual Report for 2005, and the results of this works are presented in DG AGRI's Annual Activity Report. 
Treba bi bilo opozoriti tudi na to, da kontrolne statistične podatke držav članic v veliki meri preverijo in potrdijo certifikacijski organi, kar je možnost, ki jo priporoča Sodišče v svojem poročilu za leto 2005, rezultati tega dela pa so predstavljeni v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih GD AGRI.
The Commission notes that some observations of the Court concern national rules on public procurement and that certain Member States have a different interpretation of those rules to that of the Court. _____________ (20) The reservation does not cover expenditure for completion of earlier (2000-2006) programmes (500 million euro) and pre-accession measures in the field of agriculture and rural devel­ opment (102 million euro). 
Komisija opozarja, da se nekatera opažanja Sodišča nanašajo na nacionalna pravila javnega naročanja in da si nekatere države članice ta pravila razlagajo drugače kot Sodišče. _____________ (20) Ta pridržek ne zajema odhodkov za dokončanje prejšnjih (2000–2006) programov (500 milijonov EUR) in predpristopnih ukrepov na področju kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja (102 milijona EUR).
(21) Pages 58, 59 and 79 to 81 of DG AGRI's AAR. 
(21) Strani 58, 59 ter 79 do 81 letnega poročila o dejavnostih GD AGRI.
C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/111 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Environment and climate action, maritime affairs and fisheries, health and consumer protection 4.45. Thepolicyareasofenvironmentandclimateaction, maritime affairs and fisheries as well as health and consumer protection are managed by the Commission under specific control systems. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/111 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Okolje in podnebni ukrepi, pomorske zadeve in ribištvo, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov 4.45 Področja politik okolje in podnebni ukrepi, pomorske zadeve in ribištvo ter zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov upravlja Komisija s posebnimi kontrolnimi sistemi.
The Court examined the internal control system of DG MARE. 
Sodišče je pregle­ dalo sistem notranje kontrole v GD MARE.
Internal Control System of DG MARE 4.46. 30randomlyselectedpaymentsconcerningthemain budget areas of DG MARE were tested. The audit found that key controls were not always fully documented with the risk that such controls are not performed. 
Sistem notranje kontrole v GD MARE 4.46 Preizkušenih je bilo 30 naključno izbranih plačil v zvezi z glavnimi proračunskimi področji GD MARE. Revizija je pokazala, da ključne kontrole niso bile vedno v celoti doku­ mentirane, kar pomeni tveganje, da se takšne kontrole ne izvajajo.
Furthermore, there was insufficient monitoring of fish catches under an international fisheries agreement that resulted in unforeseen expenditure for the Commission, as illustrated in example 4.6. 
Poleg tega se je premalo spremljal ulov rib v okviru mednarodnega sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju, kar je povzročilo nepredvidene odhodke za Komisijo, kot je prikazano v primeru 4.6.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S The monitoring of catches has been strengthened and an alert mechanism now prevents overshooting. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E Spremljanje ulova se je okrepilo, preseganje kvot pa po novem preprečuje mehanizem za opozarjanje.
Example 4.6 — Insufficient monitoring of fish catches The Commission acknowledges that there was some delay in the monitoring of pelagic catches during the protocol year 2009/2010 (1 August to 31 July) and that this had certain consequences in terms of additional payments to be made to Mauritania in 2010. 
Primer 4.6 – Premajhno spremljanje ulova rib Komisija priznava, da je prišlo pri spremljanju pelagičnih ulovov v letu veljavnosti Protokola 2009/2010 (1. avgust–31. julij) do nekaj zamude, kar je imelo posledice v smislu dodatnih plačil, ki jih je bilo treba leta 2010 izplačati Mavretaniji.
This issue has now been fully addressed by specifically deducting the exceeded quantity (and of course the related payment) from the additional pelagic quota for 2011/2012. 
Ta težava je zdaj v celoti odpravljena s specifičnim odbitkom presežene količine (in s tem povezanega plačila) od dodatne kvote za pelagični ulov v letu 2011/2012.
In other words, what was caught and paid for in 2009/2010 was taken off in 2011/2012. 
Z drugimi besedami, kar je bilo ulovljeno in plačano v letu 2009/2010, se odbije v letu 2011/2012.
Thus, both sustainability and sound financial management were respected. 
Tako sta bila upoštevana trajnost in dobro finančno poslovodenje.
Moreover, to further strengthen monitoring of catches, general working methods have improved substantially from 2010 onwards. 
Poleg tega so bile z letom 2010 uvedene bistvene izboljšave splošnih metod dela, da bi se spremljanje ulova dodatno okrepilo.
An alert mechanism (pelagic catches which are close to the catch limits are being monitored on a weekly basis) was introduced to prevent the overshooting. 
Uveden je bil mehanizem za opozarjanje (pelagični ulovi blizu zgornje meje ulova se spremljajo tedensko), da se prepreči preseganje kvot.
In 2011, following the exhaustion of the quota, the Commission closed the pelagic fishery 16 days before the end of the Protocol year, after having monitored pelagic catches on a weekly and in the last period also on a daily basis. 
Leta 2011 je Komisija po izčrpanju kvote ustavila pelagični ribolov 16 dni pred koncem leta veljavnosti Protokola, kar je sledilo tedenskemu, v zadnjem obdobju pa tudi dnevnemu spremljanju pelagičnih ulovov.
The same precautionary approach prevailed in 2012 (closing of the pelagic fishery already on 23 April 2012). 
Enak previdnostni pristop je prevladal leta 2012 (pelagični ribolov je bil ustavljen že 23. aprila 2012).
EN C 344/112 Official Journal of the European Union T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 12.11.2012 T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S Other DGs' management representation — the annual activity reports (AARs) 4.47. 
SL C 344/112 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 12.11.2012 O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E Poslovodske predstavitve drugih GD – letna poročila o dejavnostih 4.47 Sodišče je pregledalo letna poročila o dejavnostih in izjave generalnih direktorjev za generalne direktorate Komisije ENV, CLIMA, MARE in SANCO.
4.48. DGENVdidnotcreateareservation,becauseits residual error rate was under the 2 % materiality threshold. 
4.48 GDENVniuvedelpridržka,kerjebilaprinjem stopnja preostale napake pod 2-odstotnim pragom pomemb­ nosti.
The Court notes that the calculation of the residual error rate by DG ENV is based on assumptions that are not fully supported by representative testing. 
Sodišče opaža, da GD ENV stopnjo preostale napake izračuna na podlagi predpostavk, ki niso v celoti podprte z reprezentativnim preizkušanjem.
4.49. DGCLIMAmaintaineditsreservationfrom2010on reputational grounds related to a significant security breach identified in the national registries of the EU Emissions Trading System. 
4.49 GDCLIMAjeohranilsvojpridržekizleta2010v zvezi z ugledom, povezan z resno kršitvijo varnosti, ugo­ tovljeno v nacionalnih registrih za sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami.
There were no reservations relating to expen­ diture, most of which relates to procurement. 
V zvezi z odhodki, ki se večinoma nanašajo na javno naročanje, ni bilo pridržkov.
4.50. DGSANCO'sonlyreservationrelatedtothefoodand feed policy area, on the basis that the residual error rate was 4,3 %. 
4.50 EdinipridržekGDSANCOsejenanašalnapodročje hrane in krme, in sicer na podlagi dejstva, da je bila stopnja preostale napake 4,3 %.
All 2011 payments in the public health policy area (except for the contributions to regulatory agencies) relate to procurement. 
Vsa plačila za leto 2011 na področju politike javno zdravje (razen prispevkov regulativnim agenci­ jam) se nanašajo na javno naročanje.
DG SANCO did not perform ex-post controls on this expenditure and assumed that, due to its ex-ante controls, the error rate for procurement related expenditure is approxi­ mately 0 %. 
GD SANCO ni opravil naknadnih kontrol teh odhodkov, ampak je domneval, da je zaradi njegovih predhodnih kontrol stopnja napake pri odhod­ kih, povezanih z javnim naročanjem, približno 0 %.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions 4.51. Based on its audit work, the Court concludes that the payments for the year ended 31 December 2011 for rural development, environment, fisheries and health were affected by material error. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA Zaključki 4.51 Sodišče je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela prišlo do zaključka, da so na plačila za razvoj podeželja, okolje, ribi­ štvo in zdravje za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2011, vplivale pomembne napake.