natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) CommissionRegulation(EC)No411/1997of3March1997(OJL62, 4.3.1997, p. 
411/1997 z dne 3. marca 1997 (UL L 62, 4.3.1997, str.
9), replaced by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003 of 11 August 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards operational funds, operational programmes and financial assistance (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 
9), ki jo je nadomestila Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1433/2003 z dne 11. avgusta 2003 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
Producer organisations have the freedom to propose operational programme measures that suit their particular situation, with the proviso that the programmes must target ÔseveralŐ of the objectives set out in the Council regulation (see Text Box 4). 
Organizacije proizvajalcev lahko v operativnih programih predlagajo ukrepe, ki ustrezajo njihovim razmeram, pod pogojem, da so programi usmerjeni na doseganje „več“ ciljev, določenih v Uredbi Sveta (glej Okvir 4).
To complete the feedback circuit, producer organisations are required to report to the Member State at the end of the programme on the extent to which they have achieved their objectives, and the lessons to be learnt for their next programme. 
Za sklenitev kroga povratnih informacij morajo organizacije proizvajalcev ob koncu programa državi članici poročati, v kolikšnem obsegu so dosegle svoje cilje in kaj so se koristnega naučile za svoj naslednji program.
This Ôprogramming modelŐ to be followed by producer organisations is illustrated in Diagram 5. 
Ta „model načrtovanja programov“, ki ga morajo upoštevati organizacije proizvajalcev, je prikazan v Diagramu 5.
The Commission regulation also specified a number of checks that the Member States should make on the operational programme proposals: Ń verify the producer organisationŐs initial situation and the operational programme objectives; Ń verify the compliance of the operational programme objectives with those set out in the Council regulation; Diagram 4 Main EU aids paid to fruit and vegetable producer organisations 1996-2004 (EU 15) Diagram 5 Programming model 
V Uredbi Komisije so prav tako podrobno določeni številni pregledi predlogov operativnih programov, ki bi jih morale izvesti države članice: — preveritev začetnega stanja organizacije proizvajalcev in ciljev operativnega programa, — preveritev skladnosti ciljev operativnega programa s cilji, določenimi v Uredbi Sveta, Diagram 5 Model načrtovanja programov
C 282/38 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 Ń verify the economic consistency and technical quality of the proposed operational programme, and the soundness of the estimates. 
C 282/38 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 20.11.2006 — preveritev gospodarske doslednosti in strokovne kakovosti predlaganega operativnega programa ter utemeljenosti ocen.
The regulation provided that the Member States should then approve the programme, require changes, or reject it. 
Uredba določa, da države članice nato program odobrijo, zahtevajo spremembe ali pa ga zavrnejo.
PART I: EFFECTIVENESS OF OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES 19. 
DEL I: USPEŠNOST OPERATIVNIH PROGRAMOV 19.
As described above, Member States and the Commission share the responsibility to ensure that the aid scheme is effective: that the aid is used to achieve progress towards the 11 objectives the Council set for operational programmes. 
Kot je opisano zgoraj, si države članice in Komisija delijo odgovornost za zagotavljanje uspešnosti programa pomoči: se pravi, da je pomoč porabljena za doseganje napredka pri 11 ciljih, ki jih je Svet določil za operativne programe.
This part of the report first looks at whether the aid scheme was implemented by the Commission and Member States in a way to encourage effectiveness, and in particular, if the Ôprogramming modelŐ operated as intended. 
V tem delu poročila je najprej obravnavano vprašanje, ali so Komisija in države članice program pomoči izvajale tako, da so spodbujale uspešnost in zlasti, ali je „model načrtovanja programov“ deloval, kot je bilo načrtovano.
It then assesses a sample of operational programmes to determine whether the measures financed resulted in progress towards the schemeŐs objectives. 
Temu sledi ocena vzorca operativnih programov, da se ugotovi, ali so financirani ukrepi prinesli napredek pri doseganju ciljev programa pomoči.
Has the aid scheme been implemented in a way to ensure that operational programmes are likely to be effective? 
Ali je bil program pomoči izvajan tako, da se zagotovi verjetnost uspešnosti operativnih programov?
Commission checks to ensure that Member States grant the EU aid according to the principles of sound financial management 20. 
Pregledi Komisije, da se zagotovi, da države članice pomoč EU dodeljujejo v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja 20.
Member States approve the operational programmes proposed by the producer organisations, but under the Treaty, the Commission retains final responsibility for the sound financial management of the EU budget and supervises the Member States. 
Operativne programe, ki jih predlagajo organizacije proizvajalcev, odobrijo države članice, vendar po Pogodbi Komisija zadrži končno odgovornost za dobro finančno poslovodenje proračuna EU in nadzira države članice.
In the ÔClearance of AccountsŐ process, the Commission visits Member States to check that the aid payments have been made in compliance with Community rules. 
Komisija v okviru postopka „potrditve obračunov“ obišče države članice in preveri, ali so bila plačila pomoči izvedena v skladu s pravili Skupnosti.
The Council regulation also set up a ÔSpecial Corps of InspectorsŐ for the fruit and vegetable sector with the role, inter alia, of ensuring a uniform application of the rules across the EU. 
Z Uredbo Sveta je bil ustanovljen tudi „poseben oddelek inšpektorjev“ za sektor sadja in zelenjave, katerega naloga je med drugim zagotavljati enotno uporabo pravil po vsej EU.
In practice, these are the same officials that check expenditure for the Clearance of Accounts. 
V praksi so to isti uradniki, ki preverjajo tudi odhodke za potrditev obračunov.
In relation to other EU agricultural policies, the operational programme aid scheme requires Member States to exercise a greater degree of judgment in deciding whether to approve, reject or require changes to the measures proposed in an operational programme. 
V primerjavi z drugimi kmetijskimi politikami zahteva program pomoči za operativne programe od držav članic večjo stopnjo presojanja pri odločanju o tem, ali naj ukrepe, predlagane v operativnem programu, odobrijo, zavrnejo ali pa zahtevajo spremembe.
However, since the initial checks of the Member StatesŐ procedures in 1997 and 1998, Commission inspections have focused on compliance with the criteria for the eligibility of expenditure and have not checked whether the Member State procedures for approving and monitoring operational programmes shown in paragraph 18 operate in a way to ensure that operational programmes are likely to be effective. 
Vendar so bili Komisijini inšpekcijski pregledi po začetnih pregledih postopkov držav članic v letih 1997 in 1998 osredotočeni na upoštevanje meril za upravičenost odhodkov in se pri njih ni preverjalo, ali postopki držav članic za odobravanje in spremljanje operativnih programov, prikazani v odstavku 18, delujejo tako, da zagotavljajo verjetnost uspešnosti operativnih programov.
Consequently, while the Commission has checked the eligibility of the aid paid out by Member States for Clearance of Accounts purposes, it has not checked whether this aid has been granted respecting the sound financial management principles, in particular, of effectiveness. 
Posledično je Komisija za namene potrditve obračunov sicer preverjala upravičenost pomoči, ki so jo izplačale države članice, ni pa preverjala, ali je bila ta pomoč dodeljena ob upoštevanju načel dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, zlasti uspešnosti.
Member StatesŐ implementation of the aid scheme Details of the audit in the Member States 24. 
Izvajanje programa pomoči v državah članicah Podrobnosti revizije v državah članicah 24.
Given the Member StatesŐ key role in approving operational programmes, the Court audited the procedures applied in all 14 Member States concerned (Text box 5). 
Glede na ključno vlogo držav članic pri odobravanju operativnih programov je Sodišče revidiralo postopke, ki se uporabljajo v vseh 14 zadevnih državah članicah (Okvir 5).
As implementation of the scheme is decentralised in some Member States, the procedures were also checked at a further 19 regional and local administrations in Italy, Spain, France and Greece. 
Ker je izvajanje programa pomoči v nekaterih državah članicah decentralizirano, so bili postopki pregledani še v 19 regionalnih in lokalnih upravah v Italiji, Španiji, Franciji in Grčiji.
The implementing regulation requires Member States to make a number of checks, but does not prescribe how. 
Izvedbena uredba od držav članic zahteva številne preglede, vendar ne določa načina njihovega izvajanja.
This gives Member States the flexibility to organise these procedures according to their context. 
To državam članicam omogoča prožnost, da te postopke organizirajo v skladu s svojimi razmerami.
Consequently, each administration has implemented the scheme in a different way and the findings below do not apply equally in all Member States (1). 
Posledično je vsaka uprava izvajala program pomoči drugače in spodaj navedene ugotovitve ne veljajo enako za vse države članice (1).
Text box 5 Details of the audit in the Member States: We based the audit of the Member StatesŐ procedures on a random sample of 30 operational programmes completed in 2003 and 2004. 
Okvir 5 Podrobnosti revizije v državah članicah Revizija postopkov držav članic je temeljila na naključnem vzorcu 30 operativnih programov, dokončanih v letih 2003 in 2004.
We visited the Member StatesŐ administrations responsible for approving those programmes and the producer organisations concerned. 
Obiskali smo uprave držav članic, odgovorne za odobritev teh programov, in zadevne organizacije proizvajalcev.
Number of operational programmes selected Spain 11 France 8 Italy 4 Greece 2 Portugal 2 United Kingdom 1 Netherlands 1 Ireland 1 The selected operational programmes were approved by the Member States between 1998 and 2001. 
Število izbranih operativnih programov Španija 11 Francija 8 Italija 4 Grčija 2 Portugalska 2 Združeno kraljestvo 1 Nizozemska 1 Irska 1 Države članice so izbrane operativne programe odobrile med letoma 1998 in 2001.
To obtain sufficient evidence, and ensure that findings were still relevant, we examined documentation from 1998 to 2005 for a further 94 operational programmes and 103 evaluation reports. 
Da bi pridobili dovolj dokazov in zagotovili, da so ugotovitve še vedno relevantne, smo za obdobje od leta 1998 do 2005 pregledali dokumentacijo za dodatnih 94 operativnih programov ter 103 ocenjevalna poročila.
We selected these randomly at the Member State authorities we visited. 
Te smo izbrali naključno pri upravah držav članic, ki smo jih obiskali.
We undertook a more limited audit of the procedures followed by the other six Member States, based on a questionnaire and a check of documentation concerning randomly selected operational programmes. 
Opravili smo tudi bolj omejeno revizijo postopkov, ki jih uporablja ostalih šest držav članic, in sicer na podlagi vprašalnika in pregleda dokumentacije za naključno izbrane operativne programe.
(1) The Court has informed Member States of the specific findings that concern them. 
(1) Sodišče je države članice obvestilo o posebnih ugotovitvah, ki se nanašajo nanje.
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/39 Criteria for assessing the implementation of the programming model 26. 
20.11.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 282/39 Merila za ocenjevanje izvajanja modela načrtovanja programov 26.
To comply with the requirements for sound financial management, Member States should apply the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness in deciding whether to approve an operational programme, thereby granting the EU aid. 
Za skladnost z zahtevami dobrega finančnega poslovodenja bi morale države članice pri odločanju, ali naj odobrijo operativni program in s tem dodelijo pomoč EU, uporabljati načela gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti.
For the aid to be effective, each action financed in the programme should have an effect: the action should result in progress being made towards one or more of the 11 objectives set by the Council Regulation. 
Če naj bo pomoč uspešna, bi morala vsaka dejavnost, financirana v programu, doseči določen uspeh: dejavnost bi morala doseči napredek na področju enega ali več od 11 ciljev, določenih v Uredbi Sveta.
Consequently, Member States should base their decision on whether to approve, reject or require changes to an operational programme on whether the producer organisation has satisfactorily demonstrated that the proposed actions are likely to achieve these objectives. 
Zaradi tega bi morala odločitev držav članic o tem, ali naj odobrijo ali zavrnejo operativni program ali pa predlagajo spremembe, temeljiti na tem, ali je organizacija proizvajalcev zadovoljivo pokazala, da bodo predlagane dejavnosti verjetno dosegle te cilje.
Member States need detailed information from the producer organisations to be able to justify their decisions to award the aid in these terms. 
Države članice za utemeljitev svoje odločitve o dodelitvi pomoči pod temi pogoji od organizacij proizvajalcev potrebujejo podrobne podatke.
They need to know, for each objective, the producer organisationŐs initial situation and what impact the action(s) is expected to have. 
Za vsak cilj morajo poznati začetno stanje organizacije proizvajalcev in vedeti, kakšen je pričakovani učinek dejavnosti.
Following this logic, and the specific requirements of the Regulation (see paragraphs 16 to 18), the Court developed audit criteria for what would be reasonable to expect in a ÔgoodŐ system (Text box 6). 
Sodišče je ob upoštevanju te logike in posebnih zahtev Uredbe (glej odstavke 16 do 18) pripravilo revizijska merila za to, kaj bi bilo razumno pričakovati v „dobrem“ sistemu (Okvir 6).
If these criteria are met, Member StatesŐ procedures are likely to ensure that the aid will be effective. 
Če so ta merila izpolnjena, bodo postopki držav članic zelo verjetno zagotovili uspešnost pomoči.
These criteria can be summarised as follows: Ń Operational programme documents should show the producer organisationŐs initial situation in respect of each of the programmesŐ objectives. 
Ta merila je mogoče povzeti, kot sledi: — Iz dokumentov operativnega programa bi moralo biti razvidno začetno stanje organizacije proizvajalcev za vsak cilj programa.
The objectives should be ÔSMARTŐ (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed): specific so that there is no doubt about what the producer organisation aims to achieve; measurable (and timed) so that their achievement can be monitored; achievable through implementing the actions proposed in the programmes; and relevant: coherent with the producer organisationŐs situation and market outlook, and with the EUŐs 11 objectives. 
Cilji bi morali biti „SMART“ (specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, relevantni in časovno določeni): specifični, tako da ni nobenega dvoma o tem, kaj želi organizacija proizvajalcev doseči, merljivi (in časovno določeni), tako da je mogoče spremljati njihovo doseganje, dosegljivi z izvajanjem ukrepov, predlaganih v programih, in relevantni: skladni s stanjem in tržnimi predvidevanji organizacije proizvajalcev ter z 11 cilji EU.
Producer organisations should give targets for each objective in relation to the initial situation. 
Organizacije proizvajalcev bi morale za vsak cilj navesti svoje podcilje glede na začetno stanje.
The documents should show how the proposed actions will achieve the programmeŐs objectives. 
V dokumentih bi moralo biti navedeno, kako bodo predlagane dejavnosti dosegle cilje programa.
At the end of the programme the producer organisation should report on the extent to which the objectives have been achieved in relation to the initial situation and targets. Ń Member States should ensure that the operational programme objectives correspond to those in the EU regulation, and that the actions proposed represent a real advance towards the objectives at a reasonable cost. 
Ob koncu programa bi morala organizacija proizvajalcev poročati, v kolikšnem obsegu so bili ti cilji doseženi glede na začetno stanje in podcilje. — Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da cilji operativnega programa ustrezajo ciljem iz uredbe EU ter da predlagane dejavnosti predstavljajo dejanski napredek pri doseganju ciljev z razumnimi stroški.
They should use the evaluation information in the producer organisationsŐ final reports to monitor the effectiveness of the operational programmes and apply the lessons learned to improve the effectiveness of future programmes. 
Za spremljanje uspešnosti operativnih programov bi morale uporabiti podatke iz ocen v končnih poročilih organizacij proizvajalcev ter pridobljene izkušnje uporabiti za izboljšanje uspešnosti prihodnjih programov.
Text box 6 Methodology: Some of the CourtŐs criteria for assessing the Member StatesŐ implementation of the aid scheme go beyond formal compliance with the letter of the regulation (see Annex). 
Okvir 6 Metodologija: Nekatera merila Sodišča za ocenjevanje izvajanja pomoči v državah članicah presegajo formalno skladnost z določbami Uredbe (glej Prilogo).
As an illustration, to comply with the regulation the producer organisation has to describe its initial situation, and the Member State has to check its accuracy. 
Kot primer, za skladnost z Uredbo mora organizacija proizvajalcev opisati svoje začetno stanje, država članica pa mora preverti, ali je to točno.
To meet the audit criteria, the Member State should also ensure that the description is related to the objectives and actions in the proposed programme. 
Za izpolnitev revizijskega merila bi morala država članica ob tem še zagotoviti, da je opis povezan s cilji in dejavnostmi v predlaganem programu.
If not, the description of the initial situation has little purpose. 
Če ni, opis začetnega stanja nima veliko smisla.
The initial situation description is not related to the operational programme objectives 30. 
Opis začetnega stanja ni povezan s cilji operativnega programa 30.
All but two of the operational programmes examined included a section called Ôinitial situationŐ and more than half (60 %) formally complied with the regulation by mentioning production, marketing and equipment, even if very briefly. 
Vsi pregledani operativni programi, razen dveh, so vsebovali oddelek z naslovom „začetno stanje“ in več kot polovica (60 %) jih je bilo uradno skladnih z Uredbo, saj so omenjali proizvodnjo, trženje in opremo, četudi zelo na kratko.
Some Member States required producer organisations to list their equipment and facilities and give a table of their production in tonnes and by value, but without requiring this to be related to the programmeŐs objectives or actions in any way. 
Nekatere države članice so od organizacij proizvajalcev zahtevale, da naštejejo svojo opremo in zmogljivosti ter v tabeli navedejo svojo proizvodnjo v tonah in po vrednosti, niso pa zahtevale, da je to kakor koli povezano s cilji ali dejavnostmi programov.
Other Member States issued no particular instructions, and accepted very general descriptions, in some cases of only one or two sentences. 
Druge države članice niso izdale nobenih posebnih navodil in so sprejele zelo splošne opise, v nekaterih primerih celo samo stavek ali dva.
Few producer organisations described their initial situation in respect of the environment, product quality and production costs, yet nearly all operational programmes had these objectives (see Text box 7). 
Le malo organizacij proizvajalcev je opisalo svoje začetno stanje pri okolju, kakovosti proizvodov in proizvodnih stroških, čeprav so imeli skoraj vsi operativni programi te cilje (glej Okvir 7).
No producer organisation described the initial situation for each of the objectives in its operational programme. 
Nobena organizacija proizvajalcev v svojem operativnem programu ni opisala svojega začetnega stanja za vse cilje.
Text box 7 Regional authorities in Spain approved an operational programme containing ten actions with a total cost of 770 000 euros. 
Okvir 7 Regionalni organi oblasti v Španiji so odobrili operativni program, ki je vseboval deset dejavnosti in katerega skupni stroški so znašali 770 000 EUR.
Six of these actions had the objective of improving product quality, eight had the objective of reducing production costs, and two had the objective of improving environmental practices. 
Pri šestih od teh dejavnosti je bil cilj izboljšanje kakovosti proizvodov, pri osmih je bil cilj zmanjšanje proizvodnih stroškov, pri dveh pa izboljšanje okoljskih praks.
The producer organisation listed in the initial situation the types of fruit grown and the surface area, but gave no information on the initial quality of the fruit, the costs of production, or the environment. 
Organizacija proizvajalcev je v opisu začetnega stanja naštela vrste gojenega sadja in površino, ni pa podala nobenih podatkov o začetni kakovosti sadja, proizvodnih stroških ali okolju.
C 282/40 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 31. 
C 282/40 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 20.11.2006 31.
In a few cases, producer organisations described the starting situation in relation to specific actions, which is a requirement in the Netherlands, for example. 
V nekaj primerih so organizacije proizvajalcev opisale začetno stanje v zvezi s posameznimi dejavnostmi, kar je na primer zahtevano na Nizozemskem.
This went some way to meeting the criteria, but did not sufficiently describe the producer organisationŐs initial situation in terms of its objectives. 
To je delno ustrezalo merilom, vendar začetno stanje organizacije proizvajalcev glede na njene cilje ni bilo dovolj podrobno opisano.
The contents of operational programmes do not always relate to the stated objectives 32. 
Vsebina operativnih programov se ne nanaša vedno na navedene cilje 32.
Several Member States required producer organisations to explicitly state in their operational programmes which EU objectives related to each action. 
Več držav članic je zahtevalo, da organizacije proizvajalcev v svojih operativnih programih izrecno navedejo, na katere cilje EU se nanašajo posamezne dejavnosti.
In these cases, the correspondence between the objective and the programme was automatic on paper, making the Member StatesŐ check of the compliance of objectives with those in the regulation a formality. 
V teh primerih je bila skladnost med ciljem in programom na papirju samodejno dosežena, zaradi česar je bilo preverjanje skladnosti ciljev s cilji iz Uredbe s strani držav članic formalnost.
However, many producer organisations listed any objective that seemed relevant in an attempt to justify the programme or particular action, regardless of whether that was their real objective or not (Text boxes 8 and 9). 
Vendar so številne organizacije proizvajalcev naštele vsak cilj, ki se je zdel relevanten, da bi upravičile program ali posamezno dejavnost, ne glede na to, ali je bil to njihov dejanski cilj ali ne (okvirja 8 in 9).
In Italy and Greece, the authorities developed detailed lists of possible actions, from which the producer organisation could choose, and gave a predetermined objective to each action. 
V Italiji in Grčiji so organi oblasti pripravili podrobne sezname možnih dejavnosti, med katerimi so lahko izbirale organizacije proizvajalcev, in za vsako dejavnost navedli vnaprej določen cilj.
The French authorities also issued a list of possible actions, but classified according to their nature, not their objective. 
Tudi francoski organi oblasti so izdali seznam možnih dejavnosti, vendar so jih razvrstili glede na vrsto dejavnosti in ne po ciljih.