natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is the reason why the new clearance mechanism for irregularity cases was introduced, as a result of which the amount outstanding towards the EU budget has been reduced by 60 %. 
Zato je bil uveden nov mehanizem za potrditev obračunov v primerih nepravilnosti, na podlagi katerega se je neporavnani znesek do proračuna EU zmanjšal za 60 %.
The Commission considers this outcome to demonstrate that this new mechanism is an effective and efficient way of clearing irregularity cases and protecting the EU’s financial interests and a strong incentive for Member States to accelerate recovery procedures. 3.54. 
Po mnenju Komisije ta rezultat kaže, da je novi mehanizem uspešen in učinkovit način potrditve obračunov v primerih nepravilnosti in zaščite finančnih interesov EU, hkrati pa močna spodbuda državam članicam, da pospešijo svoje postopke izterjave.
The Commission obtained enough information on debtors for clearance and accounting purposes. 
3.54 Komisija je pridobila dovolj informacij o dolžnikih za potrditev obračunov in računovodske namene.
The corrections of EUR 14,8 million were proposed by the Commission based on its assessment of the information provided by the certification bodies in their reports. 
Komisija je predlagala popravke v višini 14,8 milijona EUR na podlagi lastne ocene infor­ macij, ki so jih v svojih poročilih predložili certifikacijski organi.
The financial errors found are pursued through the normal clearance of accounts procedures. 
Ugotovljene finančne napake se obravnavajo v okviru običajnih postopkov za potrditev obračunov.
Conformitydecisionsaretakenfollowingadditional verifications by the Commission of the expenditure declared by the Members States. They cover a number of years and have the objective of excluding expenditure from EU financing where the Commission has found that it ‘has been incurred in a way that has infringed EU rules’ (35). 
76 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A P o t r d i t e v s k la d n o s t i 3.55 Odločbe o skladnosti se sprejmejo, potem ko Komisija dodatno preveri odhodke, ki jih prijavijo države članice. Zaje­ majo več let, njihov cilj pa je izločitev odhodkov iz financi­ ranja EU, če Komisija ugotovi, da niso nastali skladno s pravili EU (35).
In previous annual reports the Court has criticised the fact that the Member States administrations, and not the final beneficiaries, are charged with the financial corrections. 
3.56 Sodišče je v svojih prejšnjih letnih poročilih kritiziralo dejstvo, da finančne popravke krijejo uprave držav članic in ne končni upravičenci.
In addition, the method provided for in the rules for calculating the conformity adjustments as applied by the Commission, involving considerable use of flat-rate corrections, means that the amounts thus recovered are not directly related to the real amount of irregular payments. 
Poleg tega metoda Komisije, ki je pred­ videna v pravilih za izračunavanje popravkov zaradi skladnosti in ki predvideva precejšnjo uporabo pavšalnih popravkov, pomeni, da tako izterjani zneski niso neposredno povezani z dejanskim zneskom nepravilnih plačil.
The conformity clearance system continued unchanged in 2009. 
Sistem potrditve sklad­ nosti je leta 2009 ostal nespremenjen.
The conformity clearance is designed to exclude expenditure from EU financing which has not been effected in compliance with EU rules. 
SL 3.56 Namen potrditve skladnosti je izvzem tistih odhodkov iz financiranja EU, ki niso bili izvršeni v skladu s predpisi EU.
In contrast, it is not a mechanism by which irregular payments to beneficiaries are recovered, which according to the principle of shared management is the sole responsibility of Member States. 
Nikakor pa to ni mehanizem za izterjavo nepravilnih plačil upravičencem, kar je v skladu z načelom deljenega upravljanja v izključni pristojnosti držav članic.
Where undue payments to beneficiaries can be identified as a result of the conformity clearance, Member States are required to follow them up with recovery actions against these beneficiaries. 
Če so bila kot rezultat potrditve skladnosti opredeljena neupravičena plačila upravičencem, morajo države članice te upravičence nadalje spremljati in zoper njih uvesti ukrepe za izterjavo.
However, even where recoveries from beneficiaries are not needed because the financial correction relates only to deficiencies in the Member States’ management and control system and not to undue payments, these corrections are an important means to improve the Member States’ systems and thus to prevent or detect and recover irregular payments to beneficiaries. 
Tudi kadar izter­ jave od upravičencev niso potrebne, ker se finančni popravek nanaša samo na pomanjkljivosti v sistemu upravljanja in nadzora, ki ga vodijo države članice, in ne na neupravičena plačila, so ti popravki pomembno sredstvo za izboljšanje sistemov držav članic ter za prepre­ čevanje, odkrivanje in izterjavo nepravilnih plačil upravičencem.
Financial corrections are determined on the basis of the nature and gravity of the infringement and the financial damage caused to the EU. 
Finančni popravki se določijo na podlagi narave in teže kršitve ter glede na finančno škodo, ki je bila povzročena EU.
The amount is calculated on the basis of the loss actually caused or on the basis of an extrapolation. 
Znesek se izračuna na podlagi dejansko povzročene izgube ali na podlagi ekstra­ polacije.
Where this is not possible, flat-rates are used which take account of the severity of the deficiencies in the national control systems in order to reflect the financial risk for the EU. 
Kadar to ni mogoče, se uporabljajo pavšalni zneski glede na resnost pomanjkljivosti v nacionalnih kontrolnih sistemih, ki odražajo finančno tveganje za EU.
The Commission therefore considers there to be a valid link between this type of financial corrections and the level of irregular payments to final beneficiaries. 
Zato Komisija meni, da obstaja utemeljena povezava med tovrstnimi finančnimi popravki in stopnjo nepravilnih plačil končnim upravičencem.
The use of flat rates has been accepted by the Court of Justice as being in conformity with the legal rules governing the conformity work and endorsed, under certain circumstances, by the European Parliament in its 2007 discharge resolution (paragraph 83). 
Sodišče Evropske unije je potrdilo, da je uporaba pavšalnih zneskov skladna s pravnimi predpisi, ki urejajo delo na področju skladnosti, pod določenimi pogoji pa jo je potrdil tudi Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji o razrešnici za leto 2007 (§ 83).
Finally, while the legal rules governing the conformity clearance system have remained unchanged, the Commission has taken action to improve its operation, including new guidelines on financial corrections and the proposal on the reinforcement of assurance referred to by the Court in paragraph 3.62. 
Končno, Komisija je ob tem, da so pravni predpisi, ki urejajo sistem potrditve skladnosti, ostali nespremenjeni, sprejela ukrepe za izbolj­ šanje njegovega delovanja, vključno z novimi smernicami o finančnih popravkih in predlogom za okrepitev zagotovila, ki ga je Sodišče navedlo v odstavku 3.62.
On the one hand, the certification bodies are requested to give an opinion on the quality of the on-the-spot inspections by checking a sample of at least 10 inspections for each of the following four populations: EAGF-IACS, EAGF-non IACS, EAFRD-IACS and EAFRD-non IACS. 
Certifikacijski organi morajo podati mnenje o kakovosti inšpekcijskih pregledov na kraju samem po pregledu vzorca vsaj desetih inšpekcijskih pregledov za vsako od naslednjih štirih populacij: EKJS-IAKS, EKJS-zunaj IAKS, EKSRP-IAKS in EKSRP-zunaj IAKS.
On the other hand, they are asked to verify and validate the Member States’ control statistics. 
Po drugi strani pa morajo preveriti in potrditi kontrolne statistične podatke držav članic.
In his AAR 2009, the Director General of DG AGRI indicates that the verification by the certification bodies of the quality of the on-the-spot inspections was largely (around 90 %) positive for the different populations and that as regards the accuracy of control statistics the opinion of the certification bodies was positive for 70 % of the EAGF population and for only 54 % of the EAFRD popu­ lation. 
Generalni direktor GD AGRI v letnem poročilu o dejav­ nostih za leto 2009 navaja, da so certifikacijski organi veči­ noma (v približno 90 % primerov) potrdili kakovost inšpekcij­ skih pregledov na kraju samem za različne populacije in da je bilo mnenje certifikacijskih organov v zvezi s točnostjo kontrolnih statističnih podatkov pozitivno za 70 % populacije EKJS in samo 54 % populacije EKSRP.
The certification body reports analysed by the Court showed that only six re-performed inspections, while 23 accompanied inspections and the remainder do not specify their approach. 
Iz poročil certifikacij­ skih organov, ki jih je analiziralo Sodišče, je razvidno, da je samo šest certifikacijskih organov ponovno izvedlo inšpe­ kcijske preglede, 23 jih je preglede spremljalo, ostali pa niso podrobneje opisali svojega pristopa.
The Court considers that re-performance of a previous inspection would provide a better basis for assessing the quality of inspections procedures as the presence of the certification body may influence the behaviour of the inspectors being assessed. 
Sodišče meni, da bi ponovna izvedba že izvedenih inšpekcijskih pregledov zagoto­ vila boljšo osnovo za oceno kakovosti inšpekcijskih postopkov, saj prisotnost certifikacijskega organa lahko vpliva na vedenje ocenjevanih inšpektorjev.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.58. An analysis of the certification bodies’ reports with regard to financial year 2009 shows that the certification bodies checked in total around 3 700 controls. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.58 Analiza poročil certifikacijskih organov za proračunsko leto 2009 kaže, da so certifikacijski organi skupno preverili približno 3 700 kontrol.
Where the certification bodies carried out the checks required: — in around 25 % of the cases, inspections were re-performed; — inspections were accompanied in a further 50 % of the cases; — in 5 % of cases both approaches were used (re-performance for certain populations and accompanied inspections for other popu­ lations); — in an additional 20 % of the cases, the certification bodies did not distinguish explicitly between the two methods. 
Kjer so certifikacijski organi opravili zahtevane preglede: — ponovna izvedba inšpekcijskih pregledov v približno 25% primerov, — spremljanje inšpekcijskih pregledov v nadaljnjih 50 % primerov, — v 5 % primerov sta bila uporabljena oba pristopa (ponovna izvedba za nekatere populacije in spremljanje inšpekcijskih pregledov za druge populacije), — pri dodatnih 20 % primerov certifikacijski organi niso izrecno razlikovali med metodama.
However, it is clear from the tables in the reports that these bodies also checked the quality of inspections using at least one method. 
Iz preglednic v poročilih pa je razvidno, da so ti organi ob uporabi vsaj ene metode preverili tudi kakovost inšpekcijskih pregledov.
Even though the Commission agrees that if carried out in due time, a re-performance of a previous check provides a better assessment of the quality of on-the-spot checks, it is still possible to evaluate the control environment through inspections accompanied by the certification body. 
Čeprav se Komisija strinja, da pravočasna ponovna izvedba že opravljenega pregleda zagotavlja boljšo oceno kakovosti pregledov na kraju samem, se še vedno ponuja možnost ocene obvladovalnega okolja na podlagi inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki jih spremlja certifikacijski organ.
These limitations are inherent in many ex-post controls performed by external auditors. 
Te omejitve so neločljivo povezane s številnimi naknadnimi kontrolami, ki jih opravijo zunanji revizorji.
In such situations, accompanied inspections are a good alternative. 
V takih primerih so spremljajoči inšpekcijski pregledi dobra alternativa.
They also have the additional benefit of reducing the administrative burden on the farmer. 
Njihova dodatna prednost je tudi, da zmanjšajo administrativno breme kmeta.
The Court considers that such information would be useful for the Commission to allow it to reliably assess the quality of the work carried out by the certification bodies. 
Sodišče meni, da bi bile te informacije za Komisijo koristne, saj bi ji omogočile zanesljivo oceno kako­ vosti dela, ki so ga opravili certifikacijski organi.
3.60. TheCourtnotesthatforanumberofpayingagencies the certification bodies could not confirm the reliability of the control statistics either because the reports were incomplete or were not made available. 
3.60 Sodišča ugotavlja, da za več plačilnih agencij certifi­ kacijski organi niso mogli potrditi zanesljivosti kontrolnih statističnih podatkov, ker so bila poročila nepopolna ali pa jih ni bilo.
If the certification body on this basis is able to confirm the accuracy of a Member State's control statistics, then the Commission will accept that the resulting error rate represents the maximum risk possible, i.e. financial corrections for the year in question can never be higher than that level. 
Če certifikacijski organ na podlagi tega lahko potrdi točnost kontrolnih statističnih podatkov držav članic, se bo Komisija strinjala, da posledična stopnja napak predstavlja največje mogoče tveganje, tj. da finančni popravki za zadevno leto nikoli ne morejo biti višji od te ravni.
These provisions are scheduled to enter into force in 2010 for financial years 2011 onwards. 
Te določbe bodo predvidoma začele veljati leta 2010 za proračunska leta od 2011 naprej.
Policy areas Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Health and Consumer Protection 3.62. Environment,MaritimeAffairsandFisheriesaswellas Health and Consumer Protection are managed by the Commission under specific control systems. 
Področja politik okolje, pomorske zadeve in ribi­ štvo, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov 3.62 Okolje,pomorskezadeveinribištvoterzdravjein varstvo potrošnikov upravlja Komisija, zanje pa veljajo posebni kontrolni sistemi.
The audit examined the internal control system relating to the animal disease and eradication programmes(36) managed by DG SANCO. 
Pri reviziji je bil preverjen sistem notranjih kontrol Komisije za programe za živalske bolezni in njihovo izkoreninjenje (36), ki jih upravlja GD SANCO.
The audit revealed that there is neither a systematic segregation of functions nor a clear definition and distinction of the roles and duties of the initiating and verifying officers. 
Pri reviziji se je pokazalo, da ne obstaja niti sistematično ločevanje nalog niti jasna opredelitev in ločevanje vlog in dolžnosti uradnikov, ki sprožijo postopek, in urad­ nikov, ki ga preverjajo.
Moreover, key controls are not implemented on the basis of a periodically reviewed formal risk analysis. _____________ (36) Budget line No 17.04.01.01. 
Poleg tega se ključne kontrole ne izvajajo na podlagi rednih pregledov uradne analize tveganja. _____________ (36) Proračunska vrstica 17 04 01 01.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.59. Certification bodies are required to keep, for each check made, a sufficiently detailed audit trail. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.59 Certifikacijski organi morajo za vsak opravljen pregled voditi dovolj podrobno revizijsko sled.
However, the Commission does not require certification bodies to provide, in the report submitted to the Commission, details of all checks made (in total around 3 700 every year), but rather to provide a summary report of the work done and the overall conclusions. 
Vendar Komisija od certifikacijskih organov ne zahteva, da v poročilu, ki ga pošljejo Komisiji, navedejo podrobnosti o vseh opravljenih pregledih (skupno približno 3 700 letno), temveč da predložijo zbirno poročilo o opravljenem delu in splošne zaključke.
Certification bodies have been asked from financial year 2010 onwards to provide more detailed information in this respect. 
Od proračunskega leta 2010 morajo certifikacijski organi v zvezi s tem zagotoviti podrobnejše informacije.
Certification bodies have properly discharged themselves of their responsibilities, by either reporting and concluding on the work done, or signalling where this was not possible. 
3.60 Certifikacijski organi so pravilno izpolnili svojo odgovornost, s poročanjem in predložitvijo sklepov o opravljenem delu oziroma z opozorilom, kje to ni bilo mogoče.
This issue was clearly reported on in the Annual Activity Report 2009 of the Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development and is being followed up by the Commission which has requested that the paying agencies in the affected Member States should take the necessary steps to ensure timely delivery of accurate information in future. 3.61. 
To vprašanje je bilo jasno izposta­ vljeno v letnem poročilu o delu Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja za leto 2009, nadalje pa ga obravnava Komisija, ki je zahtevala, da plačilne agencije v prizadetih državah članicah sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za pravočasno zagotovitev točnih podatkov v prihodnje.
At the moment of this report, several Member States have indicated that they will be asking the certification bodies to carry out the required work or are considering whether to do so. 
3.61 V času sestave tega poročila je več držav članic navedlo, da nameravajo od certifikacijskih organov zahtevati, da opravijo potrebno delo, oziroma da preučujejo to možnost.
Moreover, the Commission notes that the re-performance would not be limited to the on-the-spot checks, but would cover the entire handling of the file, from receipt of the aid application to the calcu­ lation and execution of the final payment, including the application of any sanctions (substantive testing). 
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja, da ponovna izvedba ne bi smela biti omejena na preglede na kraju samem, temveč mora zajeti celotno obravnavo spisa, od prejema zahtevka za pomoč do izračuna in izvedbe končnega plačila, vključno z uporabo morebitnih kazni (preiz­ kušanje podatkov).
3.63. The duties and the roles of the officers (financial initiators and verificators, operational initiators and verificators) are set out in the job description. 
3.63 Dolžnosti in vloge finančnih in operativnih uradnikov (tistih, ki sprožijo postopek, in tistih, ki ga preverjajo) so opredeljene v opisu delovnega mesta.
The Commission will further clarify the segre­ gation of duties between the different officers. 
Komisija bo dodatno pojasnila ločevanje dolžnosti med različnimi uradniki.
It can also be seen from the consecutive annual decisions related to the envisaged EU contributions towards the eradication/surveillance programmes of the diseases that legislation is evolving in function of the needs on the field and the risks (ceilings are in/decreased, eligible measures are adapted and better defined, the reporting requirements are updated and fine tuned). 
Prav tako je iz zaporednih letnih sklepov v zvezi s predvidenimi prispevki EU za programe za izkoreni­ njenje in spremljanje živalskih bolezni razvidno, da se zakonodaja spreminja v smeri potreb na terenu in tveganj (zgornje meje so povišane/znižane, upravičeni ukrepi so prilagojeni in bolje opredeljeni, zahteve za poročanje so posodobljene in natančno usklajene).
Since internal controls are not standardised, there is a risk of non-performance of important controls. 
Ker notranje kontrole niso standardizirane, obstaja tveganje, da se pomembne kontrole ne bodo izvedle.
There is no standardised report of the veterinary officers about the implementation of the operational programmes and there are no standardised checklists for the controls performed. 
Poročila veterinarskih uradnikov o izvajanju operativnih programov in kontrolni seznami za izvedene kontrole niso standardizirani.
Finally, the small number of ex-post audits does not adequately contribute to providing assurance that the payments are free from material error. 
In nazadnje, majhno število naknadnih revizij ne prispeva ustrezno k pridobivanju zagoto­ vila, da v plačilih ni pomembnih napak.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.64. Although the nature of the programmes is not fully comparable (eradication vis-à-vis monitoring) a maximum of stan­ dardisation is envisaged for internal control, reporting and checking. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.64 Čeprav narava programov ni povsem primerljiva (izkoreni­ njenje nasproti spremljanju), je za notranji nadzor, poročanje in preverjanje predvidena maksimalna stopnja standardizacije.
It should be recalled that the financial initiators and the veterinary officials are experienced and act under close supervision of the direct hierarchy. 
Opomniti je treba, da so finančni uradniki, ki sprožijo postopek, in veterinarski uradniki izkušeni, delujejo pa pod strogim nadzorom neposredno nadrejenega.
Due to a lack of human resources during 2009 and the priority that had to be given to ex-ante audits on the Emergency Fund, only a small number of ex-post audits could be carried out. 
Zaradi pomanjkanja kadrovskih virov v letu 2009 in prednosti, ki jo je bilo treba dati predhodnim revizijam Sklada za nujne primere, je bilo mogoče opraviti le majhno število naknadnih revizij.
Nevertheless, as the ex-post controls are organised on a two-year basis, more than 35 % of the amount paid could be ex-post checked. 
Ker pa se naknadne kontrole organizirajo vsaki dve leti, bi bilo mogoče naknadno preveriti več kot 35% plačanega zneska.
The Commission underlines that all the building blocks taken together provide reasonable assurance (management’s assessment of the entire internal control system, audit results, follow-up of previous year’s reservation and action plan for audits from previous years and assurance received from other authorising officers in cases of crossed sub-delegation). 
Komisija poudarja, da ob skupni obravnavi vseh elementov ti dajejo zadostno zagotovilo (poslovodska ocena celotnega internega kontrolnega sistema, rezultati revizije, spremljanje pridržka iz prejšnjega leta in akcijskega načrta za revizije iz prejšnjih let ter zagotovila drugih odredbodajalcev v primerih nadaljnjega navzkrižnega prenosa).
TheCourtreviewedtheCommissionmanagement representations, notably the Annual Activity Reports (AAR) and declarations by Directors-General, for Commission Direc­ torates General AGRI, ENV, MARE and SANCO. 
ZANESLJIVOST POSLOVODSKIH PREDSTAVITEV KOMISIJE 3.65 Sodišče je pregledalo poslovodske predstavitve Komi­ sije, zlasti letno poročilo o dejavnostih in izjave generalnih direktorjev generalnih direktoratov Komisije AGRI, ENV, MARE in SANCO.
The results of the review are summarised in Annex 3.3. 
Rezultati pregleda so povzeti v Prilogi 3.3.
3.66. InhisAARtheDirectorGeneralforAgriculture concludes that there is no evidence of major problems that could affect the assurance of the Director General. 
3.66 Generalni direktor za kmetijstvo v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih ugotavlja, da ni dokazov o večjih težavah, ki bi lahko vplivale na zagotovilo generalnega direktorja.
Referring to DG AGRI’s own audit results and the results of on-the-spot inspections carried out by the Member States he concludes that the residual error rate for direct aids, market intervention and rural development measures is below 2 %. 3.66. 
Na podlagi rezultatov lastne revizije GD AGRI in rezultatov inšpekcijskih pregledov na kraju samem, ki jih izvajajo države članice, je ugotovil, da preostala stopnja napake za neposredne pomoči, intervencije na trgu in ukrepe za razvoj podeželja znaša manj kot 2 %.
The declaration of assurance and the annual activity report of the Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development have been established in accordance with the Commission’s internal guidelines and, for the reasons set out in the Commission replies to paragraphs 3.67 to 3.69, give a fair assessment of the financial management in relation to the regularity of agricultural expenditure. 
3.66 Izjava o zagotovilu in letno poročilo o delu generalnega direktorja za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja sta bila sestavljena v skladu z notranjimi smernicami Komisije in ob upoštevanju razlogov, navedenih v odgovorih Komisije na odstavke 3.67 do 3.69, dajeta pošteno oceno finančnega poslovodenja v zvezi s pravilnostjo kmetij­ skih odhodkov.