natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although the sample results show that most producer organisations made at least some progress towards most of the 11 objectives, this is not sufficient on its own to confirm that the operational programme aid scheme has been effective, because of the influence of the other factors described in paragraph 64. 
Čeprav rezultati vzorca kažejo, da je večina organizacij proizvajalcev pri doseganju večine od 11 ciljev dosegla vsaj nekaj napredka, to zaradi vpliva drugih dejavnikov, opisanih v odstavku 64, samo po sebi ne zadošča za potrditev, da je bil program pomoči za operativne programe uspešen.
Diagram 9 Sample of producer organisations: progress towards EU objectives 
Diagram 9 Vzorec organizacij proizvajalcev: napredek pri doseganju ciljev EU
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/47 Commission data on producer organisations 69. 
20.11.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 282/47 Podatki Komisije o organizacijah proizvajalcev 69.
As shown in Part I, the Commission has not taken the opportunity of exploiting the evaluations made by producer organisations in their final reports to monitor achievement of the operational programme objectives. 
Kot je prikazano v delu I, Komisija ni izkoristila priložnosti, da bi ocene, ki so jih v svojih končnih poročilih podale organizacije proizvajalcev, uporabila za spremljanje doseganja ciljev operativnega programa.
Furthermore, the Commission has not so far complied with its obligation under the EU Financial Regulation to evaluate the policy. 
Poleg tega Komisija doslej ni izpolnila svoje obveznosti ocenjevanja politike, ki jo ima v skladu s Finančno uredbo.
An evaluation study is scheduled to start in 2008, with the results expected in 2009. 
Ocenjevalna študija bi se morala začeti v letu 2008, rezultati pa se pričakujejo v letu 2009.
Nevertheless, the Commission does have some information on producer organisations. 
Komisija ima kljub temu nekaj podatkov o organizacijah proizvajalcev.
It obtains data on the quantities of surplus produce withdrawn from the market for which aid is claimed. 
Zbira podatke o količinah presežne proizvodnje, umaknjene s trga, za katero se zahteva pomoč.
Since 2000, it has also required information on operational programmes and extended the information collected on producer organisations in an annual statistical report from the Member States. 
Od leta 2000 zahteva tudi podatke o operativnih programih, obseg podatkov, zbranih o organizacijah proizvajalcev, pa je v letnem statističnem poročilu držav članic razširila.
The data on operational programmes is limited to breakdowns of the aid paid by categories of expenditure. 
Podatki o operativnih programih so omejeni na razčlenitev pomoči, plačane po kategorijah odhodkov.
This indicates what the operational programme aid is being spent on, but not what is being achieved with that aid. 
To kaže, za kaj je bila porabljena pomoč za operativni program, ne pa, kaj je bilo s to pomočjo doseženo.
The Commission requires a more extensive set of data on producer organisations, in particular on their membership, their production and their sales. 
Komisija zahteva obsežnejši sklop podatkov o organizacijah proizvajalcev, zlasti o njihovem članstvu, proizvodnji in prodaji.
The CourtŐs checks on the reliability of this information were made difficult, as the Commission does not have a proper management information system for recording the data. 
Sodišče je težko preverjalo zanesljivost teh podatkov, saj Komisija nima pravega upravljavskega informacijskega sistema za njihovo beleženje.
The Commission addressed numerous queries to the Member States in 2004 and 2005 on inconsistencies in the data, but did not follow these up. 
Komisija je v letih 2004 in 2005 na države članice naslovila številna vprašanja o nedoslednosti podatkov, vendar po tem ni nadalje ukrepala.
Important data is lacking, particularly for the three largest fruit and vegetable producing Member States: Italy, Spain and France. 
Manjkajo pomembni podatki, zlasti za tri države članice, ki so največje pridelovalke sadja in zelenjave: Italijo, Španijo in Francijo.
Analysis of the data is hampered by its incompleteness and the large number of inconsistencies, making it insufficiently reliable for indicating anything other than broad trends. 
Analiza podatkov je otežena zaradi njihove nepopolnosti in številnih nedoslednosti, zato je premalo zanesljiva, da bi pokazala kar koli drugega kot splošne trende.
The main indicator that can be derived from this data is the share of producer organisationsŐ output in the EU total. 
Glavni kazalnik, ki ga je mogoče izpeljati iz teh podatkov, je delež proizvodnje organizacij proizvajalcev v celotni proizvodnji EU.
This shows how much production is concentrated in producer organisations, which is the overall aim of the policy for the fruit and vegetable sector. 
Ta kaže, v kolikšni meri je proizvodnja koncentrirana v organizacijah proizvajalcev, kar je splošni cilj politike za sektor sadja in zelenjave.
It also indicates the broader success of the policy by showing what proportion of fruit and vegetable growers choose to participate in the EU aid scheme. 
Prav tako kaže širši uspeh politike, saj je razvidno, kolikšen delež pridelovalcev sadja in zelenjave se je odločil za sodelovanje v programu pomoči EU.
In the 2005 budget documents the Commission set a target of 60 % for this indicator by 2013, with an annual increase. 
V proračunskih dokumentih za leto 2005 je Komisija za ta kazalnik določila cilj 60 % do leta 2013, z letnim povečanjem.
Consequently, while it has data on withdrawals and the concentration of supply, the Commission has no indicators to show the progress made by producer organisations towards achieving the other policy objectives such as reducing costs, stabilising prices, improving quality and the environment. 
Posledično Komisija kljub temu, da ima podatke o umikih in koncentraciji ponudbe, nima kazalnikov, ki bi kazali napredek organizacij proizvajalcev pri doseganju drugih ciljev politike, kot so zmanjšanje stroškov, stabiliziranje cen, izboljšanje kakovosti in okolja.
Analysis of data on withdrawals of surplus produce 75. 
Analiza podatkov o umikih presežne proizvodnje 75.
The reform of the fruit and vegetable policy in 1996 limited the quantities of surplus produce that could be disposed of under the withdrawals aid scheme, and cut the compensation paid to growers for those withdrawals. 
Reforma politike za sadje in zelenjavo leta 1996 je omejila količino presežne proizvodnje, ki jo je mogoče odstraniti v okviru programa pomoči za umike, ter zmanjšala nadomestila, izplačana pridelovalcem za te umike.
The Commission data shows that this has resulted in a substantial reduction in the quantities of withdrawals within the EU aid scheme (Diagram 10). 
Podatki Komisije kažejo, da se je zaradi tega količina umikov znotraj programa pomoči EU močno zmanjšala (glej Diagram 10).
This is in line with the result of the CourtŐs sample that 90 % of producer organisations had reduced withdrawals, or maintained them at zero. 
To se ujema z rezultatom vzorca Sodišča, ki kaže, da je 90 % organizacij proizvajalcev zmanjšalo umike ali jih ohranilo na stopnji nič.
One of the objectives set for the operational programme aid scheme was to support measures taken by producer organisations to reduce withdrawals. 
Eden od ciljev, določenih za program pomoči za operativne programe, je bil podpiranje ukrepov, ki jih organizacije proizvajalcev sprejmejo za zmanjšanje umikov.
However, this reduction in withdrawals does not necessarily prove that the operational programme aid has resulted in producer organisations planning and adjusting their production to the demand: producer organisations explained that the reduced aid rates for withdrawals phased in since 1996, together with increased controls, make it no longer worthwhile to claim the aid on their surplus production. 
Vendar to zmanjša-Diagram 10 Umiki sadja in zelenjave, za katere je bila izplačana pomoč 1994–2004 (EU-15) nje umikov ne dokazuje nujno, da so organizacije proizvajalcev zaradi pomoči, ki so jo prejele za svoje operativne programe, načrtovale in prilagodile svojo proizvodnjo povpraševanju: organizacije proizvajalcev so pojasnile, da se zaradi znižanih stopenj pomoči za umike, ki so bile postopno uvedene od leta 1996, in povečanega nadzora ne splača več vložiti zahtevka za pomoč za njihovo presežno proizvodnjo.
Analysis of data on the concentration of supply 77. 
Analiza podatkov o koncentraciji ponudbe 77.
The policy introduced in 1996 should result in a situation where the aid helps producer organisations to adapt and succeed and other growers are encouraged to join. 
Rezultat politike, uvedene leta 1996, bi morale biti razmere, kjer pomoč organizacijam proizvajalcev pomaga, da se prilagodijo in uspejo, druge pridelovalce pa spodbudijo, da se jim pridružijo.
Both of these factors should increase the turnover of producer organisations, Ôconcentrating supplyŐ in their hands. 
Oba dejavnika bi morala povečati promet organizacij proizvajalcev s „koncentriranjem ponudbe“ v njihovih rokah.
C 282/48 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 Diagram 11 Share of producer organisations in total value of marketed production (EU 15) 78. 
C 282/48 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 20.11.2006 Diagram 11 Delež organizacij proizvajalcev v skupni vrednosti tržene proizvodnje (EU-15) 78.
However, the CommissionŐs data shows that the concentration of supply indicator has decreased: producer organisationsŐ share of the total output fell from 40 % in 1999 to 31 % in 2003 (Diagram 11). 
Vendar podatki Komisije kažejo, da se je kazalnik koncentracije ponudbe znižal: delež organizacij proizvajalcev v skupni proizvodnji je s 40 % v letu 1999 padel na 31 % v letu 2003 (Diagram 11).
(The figure shown for 2004 is provisional, as two of the largest Member States, France and Italy, have not reported complete data). 
(Številka, prikazana za leto 2004, je začasna, saj dve največji državi članici, Francija in Italija, nista sporočili vseh podatkov).
While the value of marketed production of the total fruit and vegetable sector increased by 45 % from 1999 to 2003, that of producer organisations increased by only 12 %. 
Čeprav se je vrednost tržene proizvodnje celotnega sektorja sadja in zelenjave od leta 1999 do 2003 zvišala za 45 %, se je delež organizacij proizvajalcev zvišal samo za 12 %.
As described in paragraph 72, it is not possible to place too much reliance on this data, other than to indicate the broad trend. 
Kot je opisano v odstavku 72, se ni mogoče preveč zanesti na te podatke, razen da se nakaže splošni trend.
The 2003 percentage was incorrectly reported by the Commission, for example, because of an error concerning missing data for Greece. 
Komisija je na primer zaradi napake v zvezi z manjkajočimi podatki za Grčijo za leto 2003 sporočila napačen odstotek.
While the Court was able to easily find and correct this, the Commission could not demonstrate to the Court that the other data is sufficiently reliable. 
Čeprav je Sodišče to zlahka ugotovilo in popravilo, Komisija Sodišču ni mogla pokazati, da so ostali podatki dovolj zanesljivi.
The data also shows the continuing geographical disparity in participation in the aid scheme (Diagram 12). 
Podatki kažejo tudi stalno geografsko nesorazmerje pri sodelovanju v programu pomoči (Diagram 12).
Portugal and Greece, the Member States in which fruit and vegetables represents the largest share of agricultural output, have the lowest participation rates, and have not shown any significant increase. 
Portugalska in Grčija, državi članici, v katerih predstavlja sektor sadja in zelenjave največji delež kmetijske proizvodnje, imata najnižji stopnji sodelovanja in nista pokazali nobenega pomembnega povečanja.
Because of this low participation in producer organisations, only 6 % of PortugalŐs fruit and vegetable sector receives aid for operational programmes, and 13 % in Greece compared to 80 % in the Netherlands. 
Zaradi te nizke udeležbe v organizacijah proizvajalcev samo 6 % portugalskega in 13 % grškega sektorja sadja in zelenjave prejema pomoč za operativne programe, v primerjavi z 80 % na Nizozemskem.
The design of the aid scheme, which rewards success by paying aid as a percentage of producer organisationsŐ turnover, should create an incentive for smaller producers with lower value production, and with the most need for adapting to the marketŐs increasing quality and environmental standards and concentrated demand, to join producer organisations. 
Zasnova programa pomoči, ki nagrajuje uspeh s plačevanjem pomoči v obliki odstotka prometa organizacije proizvajalcev, bi morala manjše proizvajalce z nižjo vrednostjo proizvodnje, pri katerih je največja potreba po prilagajanju zahtevam trga po boljši kakovosti in višjih okoljskih standardih ter koncentriranem povpraševanju, spodbuditi, da se pridružijo organizacijam proizvajalcev.
The data shows that in some Member States, this has not happened. 
Podatki kažejo, da se v nekaterih državah članicah to ni zgodilo.
Instead the scheme has had the result of directing the aid to large producer organisations with high value production. 
Namesto tega je bil rezultat programa usmerjanje pomoči k velikim organizacijam proizvajalcev z visoko vrednostjo proizvodnje.
The Commission lacks information on the differences in performance of producer organisations and other growers and so cannot explain why the sector outside producer organisations appears to be growing at a faster rate than producer organisations. 
Komisiji primanjkuje podatkov o razlikah v uspešnosti organizacij proizvajalcev in drugih pridelovalcev in zato ne more pojasniti, zakaj kaže, da je rast sektorja zunaj organizacij proizvajalcev hitrejša od rasti organizacij proizvajalcev.
To explain the lack of progress in the concentration of supply, it is also necessary to find out why growers do not join producer organisations. 
Da bi se pojasnilo pomanjkanje napredka pri koncentraciji ponudbe, je treba tudi ugotoviti, zakaj se pridelovalci ne pri-družujejo organizacijam proizvajalcev.
The Commission has not questioned producers in any systematic way to find the real reasons for this. 
Komisija ni na noben sistematičen način spraševala proizvajalcev, da bi ugotovila prave razloge za to.
In its reply to the CourtŐs Annual Report 2000, the Commission stated Ôif the majority of producers ... prefer not to join an effective producer organisation, they must also take the consequences of their decision. 
Komisija je v svojem odgovoru na Letno poročilo Sodišča za leto 2000 navedla: „če se večina proizvajalcev ... odloči, da se raje ne bodo pridružili uspešni organizaciji proizvajalcev, morajo sprejeti tudi posledice svoje odločitve.
A comparison of the income of those belonging to producer organisations and that of non-members will show which choice was betterŐ. 
Primerjava dohodkov članov organizacij proizvajalcev in nečlanov bo pokazala, katera izbira je bila boljša“.
However, the Commission has not monitored the revenues of producer organisation members to be able to make this comparison. 
Vendar Komisija ni spremljala prihodkov članov organizacij proizvajalcev, da bi lahko opravila to primerjavo.
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/49 Diagram 12 Producer organisationsŐ share of the total value of marketed production 2000-2004 Rural development 84. 
20.11.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 282/49 Diagram 12 Delež organizacij proizvajalcev v skupni vrednosti tržene proizvodnje v obdobju 2000–2004 Razvoj podeželja 84.
One particular risk, identified by the Commission at an early stage, is that the availability of rural development funding may have undermined the incentive to join or form producer organisations by offering aid similar to operational programmes without requiring the growers to be members of producer organisations (see Text box 18). 
Komisija je že na zgodnji stopnji opredelila posebno tveganje, in sicer da lahko razpoložljivost financiranja za razvoj podeželja, ki nudi podobno pomoč, kot je tista za operativne programe, vendar brez obveznega članstva v organizaciji proizvajalcev, oslabi spodbudo za pridelovalce, da oblikujejo organizacije proizvajalcev ali pa se jim pridružijo (glej Okvir 18).
Although the rural development regulation addressed this issue (by providing that fruit and vegetable producers are not eligible for rural development aid to the extent that similar aid is available under operational programmes), exceptions were allowed. 
Čeprav je bilo to vprašanje obravnavano v uredbi o razvoju podeželja (ki določa, da proizvajalci sadja in zelenjave niso upravičeni do pomoči za razvoj podeželja, v kolikor je podobna pomoč na voljo v okviru operativnih programov), so bile dovoljene izjeme.
As a result of these exceptions, Rural Development funding is available for a similar range of activities, from irrigation projects to packaging machinery, for producer organisations and other growers alike. 
Zaradi teh izjem so sredstva za razvoj podeželja na voljo za podobno vrsto dejavnosti, od namakalnih projektov do embalažnih strojev, tako za organizacije pridelovalcev kot za ostale.
A significant proportion of Rural Development projects under the measures Ôinvestments in agricultural holdingsŐ and Ôimproving the processing and marketing of agricultural productsŐ concern fruit and vegetables. 
Precejšen del projektov za razvoj podeželja pod ukrepoma „naložbe v kmetijska gospodarstva“ in „izboljšanje predelave in trženja kmetijskih proizvodov“ zadeva sadje in zelenjavo.
Despite the potential importance of the risk of the Rural Development programmes undermining producer organisations, which are the cornerstone of the EUŐs policy for fruit and vegetable producers, the Commission has not checked the operation of Member StatesŐ procedures for ensuring consistency, or collected information or undertaken any assessment of the extent to which this may have occurred. 
Komisija kljub možni pomembnosti tveganja, da bodo programi za razvoj podeželja oslabili organizacije proizvajalcev, ki so temelj politike EU za proizvajalce sadja in zelenjave, ni preverjala delovanja postopkov držav članic za zagotavljanje doslednosti, niti ni zbirala podatkov ali opravila ocene, v kolikšnem obsegu se je to tveganje morda uresničilo.
CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of operational programmes Has the aid scheme been implemented in a way to ensure that operational programmes are likely to be effective? 
ZAKLJUČKI Uspešnost operativnih programov Ali je bil program pomoči izvajan tako, da se zagotovi verjetnost uspešnosti operativnih programov?
Member States have focused on the eligibility of operational programme actions by the nature of the expenditure, without also considering whether they represent a step forward for the producer organisation towards achieving the operational programme objectives. 
Države članice so se osredotočile na upravičenost dejavnosti operativnih programov glede na vrsto odhodkov, ne da bi pri tem upoštevale, ali za organizacije proizvajalcev predstavljajo korak naprej pri doseganju ciljev operativnih programov.
As a result, Member StatesŐ procedures do not Text box 18 Key features of the two aid schemes Aid only available to producer organisations? Multiannual programme? 
Države članice pri odobravanju operativnih programov niso uporabljale načela dobrega finančnega Okvir 18 Osnovne značilnosti obeh programov pomoči Ali je pomoč na voljo samo organizacijam proizvajalcev?
Objectives include planning and adapting production to demand, reducing costs, improving quality and environment? 
Ali cilji zajemajo načrtovanje in prilagajanje proizvodnje glede na povpraševanje, zmanjševanje stroškov, izboljšanje kakovosti in okolja?
Measures proposed, implemented and co-funded by beneficiary? 
Ali ukrepe predlaga, izvaja in sofinancira upravičenec?
Measures approved and checked by Member State? 
Ali ukrepe odobri in preveri država članica?
Evaluation at end of programme? 
Ali ob koncu programa sledi ocena?
Rural Operational development programmes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 
Razvoj Operativni podeželja programi Ne Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da
Commission checks have focused on compliance with the criteria for the eligibility of expenditure and not on whether the Member State procedures for approving and monitoring operational programmes operate in a way to ensure that the programmes are likely to be effective. 
Pregledi Komisije so bili osredotočeni na skladnost z merili za upravičenost odhodkov, ne pa na to, ali postopki držav članic za odobravanje in spremljanje operativnih programov delujejo tako, da zagotavljajo verjetnost uspešnosti operativnih programov.
The aid scheme has been costly to implement for the Member State administrations and for producer organisations. 
Izvajanje programa pomoči je bilo drago tako za uprave držav članic kot za organizacije proizvajalcev.
The programming elements required by the regulations have been followed nominally, at a significant cost but without real benefits. 
Elementi načrtovanja programov, določeni v uredbah, so bili formalno upoštevani, toda s precejšnjimi stroški in brez pravih koristi.
The criteria for the eligibility of expenditure were not clear, resulting in uncertainty and an increased need for controls to ensure compliance. 
Merila za upravičenost odhodkov niso bila jasna, kar je povzročalo negotovost in večjo potrebo po kontrolah, da se zagotovi skladnost.
Almost half of the actions financed in operational programmes resulted in a significant advance from the producer organisationsŐ initial situation towards at least one of the 11 objectives, and can therefore be considered effective. 
Skoraj polovica dejavnosti, financiranih v operativnih programih, je v primerjavi z začetnim stanjem organizacije proizvajalcev prinesla precejšen napredek pri doseganju vsaj enega od 11 ciljev in jih je zato mogoče šteti za uspešne.
Member States have also granted the aid for operational programme actions with low effectiveness that achieve little change. 
Države članice so pomoč dodelile tudi za dejavnosti operativnih programov z nizko uspešnostjo, ki prinašajo malo sprememb.
In these cases, the aid could be more effective if better targeted. 
V teh primerih bi bila lahko pomoč uspešnejša, če bi bila bolje ciljno usmerjena.
Progress made by producer organisations Have producer organisations made progress towards achieving the objectives set for the aid scheme? 
Napredek, ki so ga dosegle organizacije proizvajalcev Ali so organizacije proizvajalcev dosegle napredek pri doseganju ciljev programa pomoči?
Producer organisations have adapted to the changing demand and made progress towards the objectives set in the Council regulation. 
Organizacije proizvajalcev so se prilagodile spreminjajočemu se povpraševanju in dosegle napredek pri ciljih, določenih v Uredbi Sveta.
Operational programmes have contributed to this, but are not the only factor. 
Operativni programi so k temu sicer prispevali, vendar niso edini dejavnik.
Rural development funding is also available to producer organisations, and to other fruit and vegetable growers, to support similar activities, with similar objectives to operational programmes. 
Organizacijam proizvajalcev ter drugim pridelovalcem sadja in zelenjave so na voljo tudi sredstva za razvoj podeželja, ki podpirajo podobne dejavnosti s podobnimi cilji, kot jih imajo operativni programi.
Market forces put pressure on all producers to meet higher environmental standards, improve product quality and control costs. 
Tržne sile so pritiskale na vse proizvajalce, da bi dosegali višje okoljske standarde, izboljšali kakovost proizvodov in stroške nadzora.
Consequently, some of these effects may have been observed even without the operational programme aid. 
Posledično bi bili lahko morda nekateri od teh učinkov opaženi tudi brez pomoči za operativne programe.
Despite the availability of EU aids to members of producer organisations, the majority of growers in the main fruit and vegetable producing Member States choose not to participate. 
Kljub temu, da so bila članom organizacij proizvajalcev na voljo sredstva pomoči EU, se večina pridelovalcev v državah članicah, ki so največje proizvajalke sadja in zelenjave, ni odločila za sodelovanje.