natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The ECB considers different scenarios in the planning of its property requirements, including teleworking arrangements and collaborative working areas. 
ECB pri načrtovanju zahtev glede nepremičnin upošteva različne scenarije, vključno z ureditvijo dela na daljavo in skupnimi delovnimi prostori.
In addition, it is currently undertaking an NWoW pilot project which includes new concepts for office workspace planning and activity-based working modes. 
Poleg tega trenutno izvaja pilotni projekt o novih načinih dela, ki vključuje nove koncepte za načrtovanje delovnih prostorov v pisarnah in za načine dela na podlagi dejavnosti.
The pilot project was launched in January 2018 with a test floor in the main building, and other test floors are expected to be set up in the remaining buildings. 
Pilotni projekt se je začel izvajati januarja 2018 s testnim področjem v enem od nadstropij glavne stavbe, druga testna nadstropja pa bodo predvidoma vzpostavljena v preostalih stavbah.
The responses from the various business areas involved in the project are being continuously monitored and evaluated by way of customer feedback loops. 
Odzivi različnih poslovnih področij, ki so vključena v projekt, se stalno spremljajo in ocenjujejo na podlagi povratnih informacij udeležencev.
The potential improvements identified are recorded for follow-up or implemented immediately where possible. 
Ugotovljene možne izboljšave se beležijo za nadaljnje ukrepanje ali začnejo takoj izvajati, če je to mogoče.
A final evaluation can only take place towards the end of the project, which is expected in 2020, when the majority of business areas have had experience of the pilot floors. 
Projekt bo mogoče dokončno oceniti šele proti koncu izvedbe, ki je predviden za leto 2020. Takrat bo večina poslovnih področij že imela izkušnjo dela v pilotnih nadstropjih.
V. Please see item (ii) of the comment on paragraph III of the executive summary. 
V. Glej postavko (ii) v pripombi na odstavek III povzetka.
Based on the audit observations and conclusions in this report, it is the ECB’s understanding that it is only addressed in recommended topics (a) and (b). 
ECB na podlagi revizijskih opažanj in ugotovitev v tem poročilu razume, da se nanjo nanašata le predloga, ki se priporočata v točkah (a) in (b).
Please also see the comments on the individual recommendations below. 
Glej tudi spodnje pripombe na posamezna priporočila.
Regarding recommended topics (c) and (d), the ECB was excluded from the institutions analysed with respect to the financing mechanisms and management procedures of large construction projects (see paragraph 43). 
Kar zadeva predloga, priporočena v točkah (c) in (d), ECB ni bila med institucijami, ki so se analizirale v zvezi z mehanizmi financiranja in postopki upravljanja za večje gradbene projekte (glej odstavek 43).
Regarding recommended topic (e), the ECA assessed the ECB’s monitoring and reporting of its buildings portfolio as “well-developed” (see paragraph 62). 
Kar zadeva predlog, priporočen v točki (e), pa je ECA ocenilo, da je v ECB spremljanje portfelja nepremičnin in poročanje o njem »dobro razvito« (glej odstavek 62).
The ECB is the only audited EU institution that has its offices in Frankfurt. This limits the opportunities for closer cooperation with the other EU institutions referred to in the report. 
ECB je edina revidirana institucija EU, ki ima pisarne v Frankfurtu, zato so priložnosti za tesnejše sodelovanje z drugimi institucijami EU, ki so obravnavane v tem poročilu, omejene.
Please see the comment on paragraph IV of the executive summary. In addition, as part of the ongoing monitoring (from January 2018 onwards) of the ECB’s NWoW pilot project, the evaluation demonstrated that it outperforms the ECB’s historic floor layout, providing 
Poleg tega je v okviru tekočega spremljanja (od januarja 2018 naprej) pilotnega projekta novih načinov dela v ECB ocena projekta pokazala, da takšna ureditev prinaša boljše rezultate kot uveljavljena razporeditev prostorov v stavbah ECB.
approximately 20% more workplaces, which preliminarily indicates an overall cost reduction per workplace. 
Z njo se namreč ustvari približno 20% več delovnih mest, kar po prvih ugotovitvah kaže na zmanjšanje skupnih stroškov na delovno mesto.
As the project is still ongoing (expected to be completed in 2020), it is not yet possible to accurately assess the potential economic and other benefits of the NWoW. 
Ker projekt še traja (predvidoma se bo zaključil leta 2020), še ni mogoče natančno oceniti morebitne ekonomske in druge koristi novih načinov dela.
The headquarters agreement between the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany and the ECB does not offer any privileges in terms of tax exemptions other than those outlined in the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union. 
Sporazum o sedežu med vlado Zvezne republike Nemčije in ECB ne določa privilegijev v obliki oprostitve davkov, razen tistih, ki so navedeni v Protokolu o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1 The ECB welcomes this recommendation. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA Priporočilo 1 ECB pozdravlja to priporočilo.
The ECB has a building/real estate strategy which was approved by management in July 2017. 
ECB ima nepremičninsko strategijo, ki jo je vodstvo odobrilo julija 2017.
The strategy was reviewed during the second quarter of 2018 (including an update of the various development options) and approved by management in August 2018. 
Strategija je bila pregledana in spremenjena v drugem četrtletju 2018 (vključno s posodobitvijo različnih razvojnih možnosti), vodstvo pa jo je odobrilo avgusta 2018.
Recommendation 2 The ECB welcomes this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 2 ECB pozdravlja to priporočilo.
The ECB will evaluate its NWoW pilot project (launched in January 2018 and expected to be completed in 2020) from an economic cost and benefit perspective and will consider integrating the results into strategic reflections on the development of its relevant policies. 
Pilotni projekt novih načinov dela (ki se je začel izvajati januarja 2018 in se bo predvidoma zaključil leta 2020) bo ECB ocenila z ekonomskega vidika stroškov in koristi ter pretehtala možnost, da rezultate vključi v strateške razmisleke o razvoju relevantnih politik.
Recommendation 3 It is the ECB’s understanding that it is not addressed by recommendation 3. 
Priporočilo 3 Kot razume ECB, se priporočilo 3 ne nanaša nanjo.
Please see the comment on Paragraph VIII of the executive summary. Recommendation 4 It is the ECB’s understanding that it is not addressed by recommendation 4. 
Glej pripombo na odstavek VIII povzetka. Priporočilo 4 Kot razume ECB, se priporočilo 4 ne nanaša nanjo.
Please see the comment on Paragraph VIII of the executive summary. Recommendation 5 It is the ECB’s understanding that it is not addressed by recommendation 5. 
Glej pripombo na odstavek VIII povzetka. Priporočilo 5 Kot razume ECB, se priporočilo 5 ne nanaša nanjo.
Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 6.6.2017 Official sending of draft report to auditees 19.7.2018 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 5.12.2018 Official replies received in all languages Parliament: 23.11.2018 Council: 15.11.2018 Commission: 30.11.2018 Court of Justice: 18.12.2018 Central Bank: 27.11.2018 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1587-9 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/896619 QJ-AB-18-033-EN-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1614-2 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/11532 QJ-AB-18-033-EN-Q 
7. 11. 2018 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1610-4 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/18578 QJ-AB-18-033-SL-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1597-8 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/599181 QJ-AB-18-033-SL-Q
The institutions spend around 11 % of their budget on administrative expenditure for buildings. 
Institucije za upravne odhodke za zgradbe porabijo približno 11 % svojega proračuna.
The composition of the buildings portfolios differs and depends on each institution’s mandate and organisational structure, nevertheless a significant share of the space used is devoted to office accommodation. 
Sestava portfeljev nepremičnin se razlikuje ter je odvisna od mandata institucije in njene organizacijske strukture, pri čemer je velik delež uporabljenega prostora namenjen pisarniškim prostorom.
The Commission has the largest buildings portfolio of which more than 80 % is office space. 
Komisija ima največji portfelj nepremičnin, od katerih je več kot 80 % pisarniških prostorov.
We examined the management of expenditure on office accommodation of the five institutions with the most office accommodation (Parliament, Council, Commission, Court of Justice and ECB). 
Sodišče je preučilo upravljanje odhodkov za pisarniške prostore petih institucij z največ pisarniškimi prostori (Parlament, Svet, Komisija, Sodišče Evropske unije in ECB).
We covered their buildings in Brussels, Luxembourg and Frankfurt and compared their data and management procedures with other EU institutions and bodies. 
Vključilo je njihove zgradbe v Bruslju, Luxembourgu in Frankfurtu ter njihove podatke in postopke vodenja primerjalo z drugimi institucijami in organi EU.
Overall, we found that the institutions manage their spending on office accommodation efficiently and decisions on office accommodation were well founded. 
Sodišče je na splošno ugotovilo, da institucije učinkovito upravljajo svojo porabo za pisarniške prostore, njihove odločitve v zvezi s pisarniškimi prostori pa so dobro utemeljene.
They cooperate with each other and apply similar decision-making principles. 
Institucije sodelujejo med seboj in uporabljajo podobna načela odločanja.
However, their building strategies are not always formalised and were sometimes outdated. 
Vendar njihove nepremičninske strategije niso vedno uradno potrjene, načrtovanje pa je bilo včasih zastarelo.
The financing mechanisms of the large construction projects we analysed were often complex and, in some cases, affected budgetary transparency. 
Mehanizmi za financiranje velikih gradbenih projektov, ki jih je Sodišče analiziralo, so bili pogosto kompleksni in so v nekaterih primerih vplivali na proračunsko preglednost.
Most of these projects were delayed, which in some cases, led to additional costs. 
Večina teh projektov je zamujala, kar je v nekaterih primerih pomenilo dodatne stroške.
Most institutions do not adequately monitor their buildings’ portfolio. 
Večina institucij svojega portfelja nepremičnin ne spremlja ustrezno.
The institutions need to develop common indicators and improve the consistency of data presented to the budgetary authorities. 
Institucije morajo razviti skupne kazalnike in izboljšati skladnost podatkov, ki jih predložijo proračunskim organom.
EN 2019 Special Report NO 01 Fighting fraud in EU spending: action needed (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
01 Posebno poročilo SL 2019 Boj proti goljufijam pri porabi EU: potrebni so ukrepi (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
Contents Executive summary About this audit What we found What we recommend Introduction Definition of fraud Protecting the EU’s financial interests against fraud Audit scope and approach Observations The Commission’s insight into the scale, nature and causes of fraud is insufficient Data on the detected fraud level is incomplete The Commission lacks insight into the level of undetected fraud The Commission’s analysis of fraud patterns and fraud risks is insufficient The Commission has not analysed the causes of fraud There are weaknesses in the Commission’s strategic approach to managing the risk of fraud Under the Commission’s governance model, responsibilities are split; however, corporate oversight of fraud risk management is insufficient There are weaknesses in anti-fraud strategies and reporting on their effectiveness Paragraph I-X I-IV V-VIII IX-X 01-09 01-03 04-09 10-13 14-128 14-49 21-32 33-37 38-46 47-49 50-64 52-57 58-64 2 
Vsebina Povzetek Informacije o reviziji Kaj je Sodišče ugotovilo Kaj Sodišče priporoča Uvod Opredelitev goljufije Zaščita finančnih interesov EU pred goljufijami Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Opažanja Komisija ima nezadosten vpogled v obseg, naravo in vzroke goljufij Podatki o ravni odkritih goljufij niso popolni Komisija nima vpogleda v raven neodkritih goljufij Analiza vzorcev in tveganj goljufij, ki jo izvaja Komisija, je nezadostna Komisija ni analizirala vzrokov goljufij Strateški pristop Komisije k obvladovanju tveganja goljufij ima slabosti V okviru modela upravljanja Komisije so odgovornosti razdrobljene, nadzor obvladovanja tveganja goljufij pri podjetjih pa je pomanjkljiv Pri strategijah za boj proti goljufijam in poročanju o njihovi uspešnosti se pojavljajo slabosti Preprečevanju goljufij ni bilo namenjene dovolj pozornosti Komisija je v pravila o porabi na najvišji ravni nedavno vključila kontrole na področju boja proti goljufijam Po letu 2021 bo treba pred sprejetjem pravil o porabi oceniti tveganje goljufij Podatke za preprečevanje goljufij je treba bolje uporabljati Odstavek I-X I-IV V-VIII IX-X 01-09 01-03 04-09 10-13 14-128 14-49 21-32 33-37 38-46 47-49 50-64 52-57 58-64 65-88 66-70 71-75 76-88 2
Fraud prevention has not received enough attention The Commission recently included fraud controls in top-level spending rules A fraud risk assessment before adopting spending rules will be required as from 2021 Better use of data for fraud prevention is needed OLAF’s administrative investigations have led to prosecution in fewer than half of cases, and resulted in recovery of less than a third of the funds The current fraud investigation system has inherent weaknesses Administrative recovery of funds is hindered by insufficient evidence Putting EPPO into operation will require coordinated effort Conclusions and recommendations The Commission’s insight into the scale, nature and causes of fraud is insufficient There are weaknesses in the Commission’s strategic approach to managing the risk of fraud Fraud prevention has not received enough attention OLAF’s administrative investigations have led to prosecution in fewer than half of cases, and resulted in recovery of less than a third of the funds Annexes Annex I — Extract of relevant legal texts 65-88 66-70 71-75 76-88 89-124 94-104 105-124 125-128 129-142 131-134 135-136 137-140 141-142 Annex II — EU and Member State bodies involved in managing the risk of fraud Annex III — Recent legislative initiatives in the EU’s area of the fight against fraud 3 
Upravne preiskave urada OLAF so pripeljale do pregona v manj kot polovici primerov, na njihovi podlagi pa je bila izterjana manj kot tretjina sredstev Sedanji sistem za preiskovanje goljufij ima inherentne slabosti Upravno izterjavo sredstev ovirajo nezadostni dokazi Za zagon Evropskega javnega tožilstva bo potrebno usklajeno prizadevanje Zaključki in priporočila Komisija ima nezadosten vpogled v obseg, naravo in vzroke goljufij Strateški pristop Komisije k obvladovanju tveganja goljufij ima slabosti Preprečevanju goljufij ni bilo namenjene dovolj pozornosti Upravne preiskave urada OLAF so pripeljale do pregona v manj kot polovici primerov, na njihovi podlagi pa je bila izterjana manj kot tretjina sredstev Priloge Priloga I — Izvleček iz ustreznih pravnih besedil 89-124 94-104 105-124 125-128 129-142 131-134 135-136 137-140 141-142 Priloga II — EU in organi držav članic, ki sodelujejo pri obvladovanju tveganja goljufij Priloga III — Novejše zakonodajne pobude EU na področju boja proti goljufijam Priloga IV — Dogodki, zaradi katerih države članice Komisiji prijavijo primere goljufij v kazenskih preiskavah Priloga V — Naloge in odgovornosti v Komisiji za izide ukrepov za boj proti goljufijam pri porabi EU Priloga VI — Viri Kratice in okrajšave Glosar Odgovori Komisije Revizijska ekipa 3
Executive summary About this audit I Fraud refers to any intentional act or omission designed to deceive others, resulting in the victim suffering a loss and the perpetrator achieving a gain. 
Povzetek Informacije o reviziji I Goljufija pomeni vsako namerno dejanje ali opustitev dejanja, namenjeno preslepitvi drugih, ki žrtvi povzroči izgubo, storilcu pa korist.
Fraud involving public funds is often linked with corruption, which is generally understood as any act or omission that abuses official authority, or seeks to bring about the abuse of official authority, in order to obtain undue benefit. 
Goljufije v zvezi z javnimi sredstvi so pogosto povezane s korupcijo, ta pa na splošno pomeni vsako dejanje ali opustitev dejanja, s katero storilec zlorabi javno oblast ali skuša doseči zlorabo javne oblasti, da bi pridobil neupravičeno korist.
II The Commission and the Member States have a shared responsibility to protect the EU’s financial interests against fraud and corruption. 
II Komisija in države članice so skupaj odgovorne za zaščito finančnih interesov EU pred goljufijami in korupcijo.
The European anti-fraud office (OLAF) is currently the EU’s key anti-fraud body. 
Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) je trenutno ključni organ EU za boj proti goljufijam.
It contributes to the design and implementation of the Commission’s anti-fraud policy and conducts administrative investigation into fraud against the EU budget. 
OLAF sodeluje pri oblikovanju in izvajanju politike Komisije na področju boja proti goljufijam ter opravlja upravne preiskave goljufij, ki škodijo proračunu EU.
In 2020, a European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) will start operating, with powers to prosecute crimes against the EU’s financial interests in 22 Member States. 
Leta 2020 bo začelo delovati Evropsko javno tožilstvo, ki bo pooblaščeno za pregon kaznivih dejanj, ki škodijo finančnim interesom EU, v 22 državah članicah.
III As fraud prevention and detection are important for the EU’s financial management, we decided to undertake a performance audit on the Commission’s management of fraud risk in EU spending. 
III Preprečevanje in odkrivanje goljufij sta pomembna za finančno poslovodenje EU, zato se je Sodišče odločilo, da bo opravilo revizijo smotrnosti o tem, kako Komisija obvladuje tveganje goljufij pri porabi EU.
In particular, we examined: — the Commission’s anti-fraud strategy, its fraud prevention tools and whether it has access to appropriate data on the scale, nature and causes of fraud in EU spending; — whether OLAF’s administrative investigations have led to prosecution and recovery. 
Preučilo je zlasti: — strategijo Komisije za boj proti goljufijam, njena orodja za preprečevanje goljufij in ali ima dostop do ustreznih podatkov o obsegu, naravi in vzrokih goljufij pri porabi EU; — ali so upravne preiskave urada OLAF vodile do pregona in izterjave.
IV We also considered the arrangements for establishing the EPPO and analysed whether the new body has the potential to address the current weaknesses. 
IV Sodišče je tudi preučilo ureditve za vzpostavitev Evropskega javnega tožilstva in analiziralo, ali bi lahko ta novi organ obravnaval trenutne slabosti.
What we found V Over the last ten years, the Commission has taken steps to fight fraud against the EU budget. In particular, it adopted the ‘Commission Anti-fraud Strategy’ (CAFS) in 2011, and each Directorate-General (DGs) or group of DGs implements its own operational anti-fraud strategy. 
Kaj je Sodišče ugotovilo V V zadnjih desetih letih si je Komisija prizadevala za boj proti goljufijam, ki škodijo proračunu EU, in sicer je leta 2011 sprejela strategijo za boj proti goljufijam, vsak generalni direktorat ali skupina generalnih direktoratov pa izvaja svojo operativno strategijo za boj proti goljufijam.
The Commission has also established an ‘Early Detection and Exclusion System’ (EDES), and an inter-institutional panel which advises on whether to exclude economic operators from EU financing on the grounds of fraud or corruption, among other possible 5 
Poleg tega je Komisija vzpostavila sistem za zgodnje odkrivanje in izključitev ter medinstitucionalni odbor, ki svetuje glede izključevanja gospodarskih subjektov iz financiranja EU, med drugim zaradi goljufije ali korupcije.
Each year, the Commission presents to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the ‘Protection of the Financial Interests of the Union’ (the ‘PIF report’). 
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsako leto predloži poročilo o zaščiti finančnih interesov Unije. 4
VI However, we found that the Commission lacks comprehensive information on the scale, nature and causes of fraud. 
5 VI Sodišče pa je ugotovilo, da Komisija nima izčrpnih informacij o obsegu, naravi in vzrokih goljufij, saj so njeni uradni statistični podatki o odkritih goljufijah nepopolni.
Its official statistics on detected fraud are not complete and it has so far not carried out any assessment of undetected fraud. Some information is available on fraud patterns and schemes used in different sectors. There is no detailed analysis to identify what causes some recipients of EU money to behave fraudulently. 
Poleg tega Komisija doslej še ni opravila nobene ocene neodkritih goljufij. Na voljo je nekaj informacij o vzorcih in sistemih goljufij, ki se uporabljajo v različnih sektorjih, ni pa podrobne analize vzrokov za goljufivo ravnanje nekaterih prejemnikov sredstev EU.
This lack of information reduces the practical value of the Commission’s strategic plans, such as the CAFS, which has not been updated since 2011. 
To pomanjkanje informacij zmanjšuje praktično vrednost strateških načrtov Komisije, kot je strategija za boj proti goljufijam, ki ni bila posodobljena od leta 2011.
VII The current approach, whereby OLAF launches administrative investigations after receiving information from other sources and whereby OLAF’s investigation of suspected fraud is often followed by a criminal investigation at national level, takes up much time in a considerable number of cases and thus it decreases the chances to achieve prosecution. 
VII Sedanji pristop, v katerem urad OLAF po prejetju informacij od drugih virov sproži upravne preiskave in v katerem njegovi preiskavi suma goljufije pogosto sledi kazenska preiskava na nacionalni ravni, je v mnogih primerih dolgotrajen, zato se zmanjšajo možnosti za dosego pregona.
As a result, OLAF investigations result in the prosecution of suspected fraudsters in about 45 % of cases. 
Zato preiskave urada OLAF privedejo do pregona osumljenih goljufov v okoli 45 % primerov.
As for the recovery of unduly paid EU money, in a number of cases, the DGs find that OLAF’s Final Reports do not provide sufficient information to serve as a basis for initiating the recovery of unduly disbursed funds. 
V zvezi z izterjavo neupravičeno izplačanih sredstev EU generalni direktorati v veliko primerih ugotovijo, da končna poročila urada OLAF vsebujejo premalo informacij, da bi bile te lahko podlaga za sprožitev izterjave nepravilno izplačanih sredstev.
In such cases, the DGs take (or outsource) further action in order to decide whether it is possible to recover the amount recommended by OLAF or they rely on evidence gathered through their own audits. 
V takih primerih generalni direktorati sprejmejo nadaljnje ukrepe (ali jih naročijo zunanjim izvajalcem), da bi ugotovili, ali je izterjava zneska, ki ga priporoča urad OLAF, mogoča, ali pa se zanašajo na dokaze, pridobljene pri lastnih revizijah.
VIII We consider establishing the EPPO (in which 22 Member States will participate) to be a step in the right direction, but the current regulation poses several risks. 
VIII Sodišče meni, da je ustanovitev Evropskega javnega tožilstva (v katerem bo sodelovalo 22 držav članic) korak v pravo smer, vendar je s sedanjo uredbo povezanih več tveganj.
Probably the most serious of these concerns the detection and investigation, which will be carried out primarily by the Member States’ investigators under the authority of the EPPO. 
Najresnejše med njimi je verjetno tveganje, povezano z odkrivanjem in preiskovanjem, ki ga bodo izvajali preiskovalci držav članic pod vodstvom Evropskega javnega tožilstva.