natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
17 In relation to application year 2010, state entities received directly some 13,8 million euro for nearly 82 000 ha of land of which more than 27 000 had been declared by the 10 national parks for which SAPS aid of 4,3 million euro was paid to the State Treasury. Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
17 Za leto oddaje zahtevkov 2010 so državni subjekti neposredno prejeli približno 13,8 milijona EUR za skoraj 82 000 ha zemljišč, pri čemer je za več kot 27 000 ha vloge za pomoč oddalo 10 nacionalnih parkov, za katere je bilo v državno zakladnico plačanih 4,3 milijona EUR pomoči iz SEPP. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
While the national budgetary ceilings available for direct payments were established by the Council, it was left to the Commission and the Member States concerned to determine precisely the areas actually eligible for SAPS aid18. 26. 
Nacionalne proračunske zgornje meje, ki so bile na voljo za neposredna plačila, je sicer določil Svet, natančna določitev površin, ki bodo dejansko upravičene do pomoči iz SEPP, pa je bila prepuščena Komisiji in državam članicam.18 26.
As mentioned above, the Act of Accession and the subsequent Council Regulations provided that the eligible agricultural area shall be that part of the ‘utilised agricultural area’ (UAA) which was in ‘good agricultural condition’ (GAC) as at 30 June 2003, whether in production or not at that date. 
Kot že omenjeno, je bilo v aktu o pristopu in poznejših uredbah Sveta določeno, da so upravičena kmetijska zemljišča „kmetijska zemljišča v uporabi“ (KZU), ki so bila 30. junija 2003 v dobrem kmetijskem stanju (GAC), ne glede na to, ali so se takrat obdelovala ali ne.
In the case of Bulgaria and Romania this historic reference however does not apply so that the eligible agricultural area is that part of the UAA being in GAC during the application year in question. 
V primeru Bolgarije in Romunije ta pretekla referenca ne velja, tako da je upravičena kmetijska površina tisti del KZU, ki je v GAC v zadevnem letu oddaje zahtevkov.
The UAA criterion excludes from the benefit of SAPS aid non-agricultural areas such as woodland or pleasure gardens but also areas no longer farmed for economic, social or other reasons (including when such areas could be brought back into cultivation using the resources normally available on an agricultural holding). 
Zaradi merila v zvezi s KZU se pomoč iz SEPP ne dodeljuje za nekmetijske površine, kot so gozdovi ali okrasni vrtovi, niti za površine, na katerih se zaradi gospodarskih, socialnih ali drugih razlogov ne izvaja več kmetijska dejavnost (tudi če bi jih bilo mogoče znova kultivirati z uporabo virov, ki so običajno na voljo na kmetijskih gospodarstvih).
The Court notes that the rules as established to date are incoherent as farmers who want to take parcels back into cultivation in the SAPS Member States that joined the EU in 2004 are excluded from SAPS aid with respect to such parcels while in Bulgaria and Romania farmers received SAPS aid where they farm formerly abandoned land. 
Sodišče ugotavlja, da so sedanja pravila nedosledna, saj kmetje, ki želijo znova kultivirati parcele v državah članicah, ki uporabljajo SEPP in so se pridružile EU leta 2004, zanje ne morejo prejeti pomoči iz SEPP, medtem ko jo kmetje v Bolgariji in Romuniji prejmejo, če obdelujejo prej opuščena zemljišča.
18 The agricultural areas in respect of which SAPS aid may be claimed are laid down in Annex VIII of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 of 29 October 2009 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards the support schemes for farmers provided for in Titles IV and V thereof (OJ L 316, 2.12.2009, p. 
1121/2009 z dne 29. oktobra 2009 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 v zvezi s shemami podpor za kmete iz naslovov IV in V Uredbe (UL L 316, 2.12.2009, str.
For the application years before 2010 the areas were laid down in Annex XXI of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials (OJ L 345, 20.11.2004, p. 
Površine za leta oddaje zahtevkov pred letom 2010 so določene v Prilogi XXI k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1973/2004 z dne 29. oktobra 2004 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
EU legislation does not further define ‘good agricultural condition’ (GAC). 
V zakonodaji EU „dobro kmetijsko stanje“ (GAC) ni dodatno opredeljeno.
At the time of the audit only Bulgaria had adopted explicit standards defining GAC. 
V času revizije je imela samo Bolgarija standarde, ki izrecno opredeljujejo GAC.
While the provisions adopted in the Acts of Accession required the national authorities to physically identify the eligible agricultural area, most Member States visited had however difficulties in reliably identifying this area. 
Določbe aktov o pristopu so sicer zahtevale, da morajo nacionalni organi fizično določiti upravičene kmetijske površine, vendar je imela večina držav članic pri tem težave z zanesljivostjo.
In the absence of a definition of the GAC and because the systems for land parcel identification (LPIS) were either not available or sufficiently developed, Member States used different methods to establish their respective agricultural area. 
Ker ni bilo opredelitve GAC in ker identifikacijski sistemi za zemljišča (LPIS) niso bili na voljo, ali pa niso bili dovolj razviti, so države članice za določitev svojih kmetijskih površin uporabljale različne metode.
In Poland, the eligible agricultural area accepted by the Commission was determined on the basis of global land use information in the 2002 farm survey and complemented by information on ‘idle land’ which was expected to be taken into agricultural use once farmers became aware that they would receive SAPS payments. 
Na Poljskem so bile upravičene kmetijske površine, ki jih je sprejela Komisija, določene na podlagi globalnih podatkov o rabi zemljišč iz popisa kmetijskih gospodarstev iz leta 2002 in dopolnilnih informacij o neobdelanih zemljiščih, za katera se je pričakovalo, da jih bodo kmetje spet začeli uporabljati za kmetijske dejavnosti, ko bodo ugotovili, da lahko zanje prejmejo plačila iz SEPP.
By contrast, the areas included in the LPIS were established on the basis of land register information which contained much larger areas but for which no information on their condition in 2003 was available19. 32. 
V LPIS pa so bile vključene površine na podlagi podatkov iz zemljiških knjig, ki so vsebovale veliko večje površine, ne pa tudi podatkov o njihovem stanju leta 2003.19 32.
In Hungary, the eligible agricultural area accepted by the Commission was determined on the basis of pre-accession land use information and the 2002 farm survey, excluding an estimate of land considered unsuitable for agriculture. 
Na Madžarskem so bile upravičene kmetijske površine, ki jih je sprejela Komisija, določene na podlagi predpristopnih podatkov o rabi zemljišč in popisa kmetijskih gospodarstev iz leta 2002 brez upoštevanja ocene zemljišč, ki se štejejo za neprimerna za kmetijstvo.
The LPIS by contrast is entirely based on the interpretation of aerial images. 
LPIS pa v celoti temelji na interpretaciji letalskih posnetkov.
The above examples also show that the LPIS which registers eligible areas for SAPS aid and which the new Member States use for the management of aid applications20, includes agricultural areas which are sometimes significantly higher than the agricultural area determined and accepted by the Commission at the time of accession. 
Navedeni primeri kažejo tudi, da so v LPIS, kjer so evidentirane površine, upravičene do pomoči iz SEPP, in ki ga države članice uporabljajo za upravljanje zahtevkov,20 vključene tudi kmetijske površine, ki so včasih mnogo večje od kmetijskih površin, ki jih je določila in sprejela Komisija v času pristopa.
This was still the case in 2010 as shown in the Table. 
Kot je prikazano v tabeli, je bilo stanje leta 2010 še vedno enako.
19 See the Table. 
19 Glej tabelo.
20 Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 of 30 November 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system, under the direct support schemes for farmers provided for that Regulation, as well as for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards cross-compliance under the support scheme provided for the wine sector (OJ L 316, 2.12.2009, p. 
20 Člen 6 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1122/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo, modulacijo ter integriranim administrativnim in kontrolnim sistemom v okviru shem neposrednih podpor za kmete, določenih za navedeno uredbo, ter za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
The Commission has not requested the Member States to analyse such discrepancies. 
Komisija od držav članic ni zahtevala, da te neskladnosti analizirajo.
The Court cannot therefore confirm whether the areas recorded as eligible for SAPS payments were actually determined in agreement with the provisions of the Acts of Accession and subsequent EU legislation21. 
Sodišče zato ne more potrditi, da so bile površine, evidentirane kot upravičene do plačil iz SEPP, dejansko določene v skladu z določbami aktov o pristopu in kasnejše zakonodaje EU21.
This uncertainty in the area eligible for SAPS aid has two types of consequences: (a) as the financial envelopes allocated to each Member State are fixed for the financial period, the average amount per hectare was reduced in proportion where the total areas declared by the farmers exceeded the agricultural area approved by the Commission; (b) the average amount of SAPS aid per hectare was increased where the agricultural area approved by the Commission was lower than the actual agricultural area as defined in the LPIS. 
Ta negotovost v zvezi s površinami, upravičenimi do pomoči iz SEPP, ima dve vrsti posledic: (a) ker je finančni okvir za vsako državo članico določen za proračunsko obdobje, je bil povprečni znesek na hektar sorazmerno znižan, kjer so vse površine, ki so jih prijavili kmetje, presegle kmetijske površine, ki jih je odobrila Komisija; (b) povprečni znesek pomoči iz SEPP na hektar je bil povečan, kadar so bila kmetijska zemljišča, ki jih je odobrila Komisija, manjša od dejanskih kmetijskih zemljišč, kot so opredeljena v LPIS.
21 Article 124(1) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
21 Člen 124(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
Hungary Poland 3 620 000 13 298 000 Agricultural area approved by the Commission (Annex VIII of Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009) 3 492 000 4 829 000 14 137 000 8 716 000 1 865 000 Total SAPS eligible area recorded in LPIS 3 707 125 5 681 781 18 245 374 13 015 446 2 083 248 Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
Madžarska Poljska 3 620 000 13 298 000 Kmetijska zemljišča, ki jih je odobrila Komisija (Priloga VIII k Uredbi (ES) št.
The Commission can approve revisions to the eligible agricultural area of a Member State where it turns out that the one initially established is incorrect. 
Komisija lahko odobri spremembe upravičenih kmetijskih površin države članice, če se izkaže, da so prvotno določene površine nepravilne.
Such adjustments can be made under the condition that the Member State concerned has defined objective and non-discriminatory criteria22. 37. 
Take prilagoditve se lahko izvedejo, če je zadevna država članica opredelila objektivna in nediskriminatorna merila.22 37.
Since 2004, the Commission approved requests for revision of the agricultural areas for Bulgaria, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. 
Komisija je od leta 2004 odobrila zahtevke za spremembo kmetijskih površin Bolgariji, Litvi, Madžarski, Poljski in Slovaški.
In the case of Bulgaria, Poland and Slovakia the revision resulted in a decrease of the agricultural area and therefore a higher per hectare rate of the SAPS aid. 
V Bolgariji, na Poljskem in Slovaškem so se zaradi sprememb kmetijske površine zmanjšale, zato se je znesek pomoči iz SEPP na hektar povečal.
This allowed these Member States to fully use their respective annual financial envelopes. 
To je tem državam članicam omogočilo, da so v celoti porabile svoje letne finančne okvire.
Hungary requested an increase of the agricultural area, because the authorities received aid applications for much larger areas than expected. 
Madžarska je zaprosila za povečanje kmetijskih površin, ker so organi prejeli zahtevke za pomoč za mnogo večje površine, kot je bilo pričakovano.
This resulted in a reduction of the SAPS payments to all farmers to avoid the annual financial envelope being exceeded. 
Zato so se plačila iz SEPP za vse kmete zmanjšala, da letni finančni okvir ne bi bil presežen.
The Court found that, while in Bulgaria the revision of the agricultural area partly resulted from the identification of ineligible land, in Hungary, Poland and Slovakia the revision was not based on verifiable criteria other than the fact that the authorities had received aid applications for less or for more agricultural land than expected. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je bila v Bolgariji sprememba kmetijskih površin deloma posledica ugotovitve neupravičenih zemljišč, na Madžarskem, Poljskem in Slovaškem pa sprememba ni temeljila na preverljivih merilih, ampak zgolj na dejstvu, da so organi prejeli zahtevke za pomoč za več oziroma manj kmetijskih zemljišč, kot je bilo pričakovano.
As early as 2005 the Commission had already informed the Slovakian authorities that the number of aid applications received in a year and any anticipated increase was not a sufficiently objective criterion for the modification of the agricultural area under SAPS. 
Komisija je že leta 2005 slovaške organe obvestila, da letno število prejetih zahtevkov za pomoč in kakršno koli pričakovano povečanje nista dovolj objektivni merili za spremembo kmetijskih površin v okviru SEPP.
However, for Hungary, Poland and Slovakia the Commission eventually accepted the requests for revision without further analysis23. 
Vendar je Komisija zahtevke za spremembo, ki so jih vložile Madžarska, Poljska in Slovaška nazadnje sprejela brez dodatne analize.23 22 Člen 124(1) Uredbe (ES) št.
23 Commission Regulations (EC) No 993/2007 (OJ L 222, 28.8.2007, p. 
23 Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 993/2007 (UL L 222, 28.8.2007, str.
10), No 316/2009 (OJ L 100, 18.4.2009, p. 
316/2009 (UL L 100, 18.4.2009, str.
3) both amending Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 387/2010 (OJ L 114, 7.5.2010, p. 
1973/2004 ter Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 387/2010 (UL L 114, 7.5.2010, str.
1) amending Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 introducing detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
1) o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št.
A particular characteristic of many SAPS Member States is the existence of tracts of unutilised or abandoned agricultural land. 
Posebna značilnost mnogih držav članic, ki uporabljajo SEPP, so kmetijska zemljišča, ki niso v uporabi ali so opuščena.
This is primarily due to the social and economic changes that occurred after 1990. 
To je predvsem posledica socialnih in gospodarskih sprememb po letu 1990.
No SAPS aid should be paid in relation to such land. 
Za taka zemljišča se pomoč iz SEPP ne bi smela izplačevati.
As pointed out above, Member States had difficulties reliably to identify that part of the UAA which was in GAC as at 30 June 2003. 
Kot že navedeno, so imele države članice težave pri opredeljevanju tistega dela KZU, ki je bil 30. junija 2003 v GAC.
The audits carried out by the Court in the framework of the annual statement of assurance had found that the LPIS often lacked sufficient quality and had not been regularly updated. 
Pri revizijah, ki jih je Sodišče izvedlo v okviru letne izjave o zanesljivosti, je bilo ugotovljeno, da LPIS pogosto ni bil dovolj kakovosten niti redno posodobljen.
The Court found that the Commission and the Member States endeavoured to improve the LPIS. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so si Komisija in države članice prizadevale za izboljšanje LPIS.
For example, in Hungary, the authorities classified between 2008 and 2010 some 891 000 ha as ineligible for SAPS payments, because they had identified the corresponding parcels as having been abandoned or not being suitable for agricultural activity anymore. 
Organi na Madžarskem so na primer med letoma 2008 in 2010 približno 891 000 ha razvrstili med neupravičene površine za plačila iz SEPP, ker so ugotovili, da so bile ustrezne parcele opuščene ali niso bile več primerne za kmetijske dejavnosti.
For Bulgaria and Romania the Commission set up specific action plans which were not fully implemented for the period audited (application year 2010) but which had already led to significant reductions in the initially eligible area. 
Za Bolgarijo in Romunijo je Komisija pripravila posebna akcijska načrta, ki v revidiranem obdobju (leto oddaje zahtevkov 2010) še nista bila v celoti izvedena, vendar so se zaradi njiju že pomembno zmanjšale prvotno upravičene površine.
In Slovakia the authorities had identified around 100 000 ha of permanent grassland (around one fifth of the total permanent grassland area) where they had doubts as to whether they are fully in agricultural use and considered reducing the per hectare SAPS payments to take account of the unutilised parts of the parcels. 
Na Slovaškem so organi za 100 000 ha trajnega travinja (približno ena petina celotne površine trajnih travinj) dvomili, da so v celoti v kmetijski uporabi, in razmišljali o znižanju plačil iz SEPP na hektar, da bi upoštevali dele parcel, ki niso v uporabi.
In spite of these efforts, the LPIS of some Member States still includes tracts of abandoned or unutilised land. Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
Kljub tem prizadevanjem so v LPIS nekaterih držav članic še vedno zemljišča, ki niso v uporabi ali so opuščena. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
22 BOX 2 PAYMENT OF SAPS AID IN RELATION TO UNUTILISED LAND In Romania, where agricultural areas declared for SAPS have increased since 2007, parcels were considered eligible even where no agricultural activity was carried out (Picture 1). 
22 OKVIR 2 PLAČILO POMOČI IZ SEPP ZA ZEMLJIŠČA, KI NISO V UPORABI V Romuniji, kjer so se prijavljene kmetijske površine od leta 2007 povečale, so se parcele štele za upravičene, tudi če se na njih ni izvajala kmetijska dejavnost (fotografija 1).
The authorities have not yet defined clear and unambiguous conditions under which abandoned land which farmers intend to take back into cultivation becomes eligible. 
Organi še niso opredelili jasnih in nedvoumnih pogojev, pod katerimi postanejo upravičena opuščena zemljišča, ki jih nameravajo kmetje znova kultivirati.
Picture 1 — Abandoned land no longer worked in Romania In Bulgaria, the authorities require as a minimum condition for eligibility that permanent grassland be grazed by animals or mown at least once a year. 
Fotografija 1 – Opuščeno neobdelano zemljišče v Romuniji V Bolgariji organi kot minimalni pogoj za upravičenost zahtevajo, da se na trajnem travinju pasejo živali ali da se ta vsaj enkrat letno pokosi.
In practice the authorities fully accept however parcels with only very limited or no agricultural activity at all (e.g. parcels just crossed by farm or wild animals). 
V praksi pa v celoti sprejmejo tudi parcele z zelo omejeno kmetijsko dejavnostjo ali celo brez nje (npr. parcele, ki jih domače ali divje živali samo prečkajo).
The Court found also examples of SAPS payments in relation to parcels where there was no evidence that any agricultural activity had ever taken place (Picture 2). 
Sodišče je odkrilo tudi primere plačil iz SEPP za parcele, za katere ni bilo dokazov, da se je na njih kdaj koli izvajala kakršna koli kmetijska dejavnost (fotografija 2).
Picture 2 — Unutilised parcel in Bulgaria Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States © European Court of Auditors. © European Court of Auditors. 
Fotografija 2 – Parcela v Bolgariji, ki ni v uporabi Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah © Evropsko računsko sodišče. © Evropsko računsko sodišče
23 In Poland, GAEC requirements demand a regular activity on arable land. 
23 Na Poljskem zahteve GAEC predpisujejo redno dejavnost na njivah.
However the Court found that SAPS aid was paid in relation to unutilised arable land shown in Picture 3. 
Vendar je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je bila pomoč iz SEPP izplačana za njive na fotografiji 3, ki niso v uporabi.
Among the beneficiaries visited the Court frequently came across similar situations. 
Sodišče je pri obiskanih upravičencih pogosto ugotovilo podobno stanje.
SAPS beneficiaries received in most cases full payment or are only subject to very moderate reductions even where the authorities found that they have not used their land for several years. 
Upravičenci do SEPP so v večini primerov prejeli celotno ali le zelo zmerno znižano plačilo, tudi kadar so organi ugotovili, da zemljišča že več let niso v uporabi.
Picture 3 — Former arable land which was not used for several years in Poland In Hungary, apart from an obligation to combat unwanted weeds, farmers are not required to carry out any agricultural activities for their parcels to be eligible. 
Fotografija 3 – Nekdanja njiva na Poljskem, ki že več let ni bila v uporabi Na Madžarskem razen odstranjevanja plevela kmetom za upravičenost njihovih parcel ni treba izvajati nobene kmetijske dejavnosti.
The Court came across cases where farmers rented large tracts of semi-natural grassland and received payments of SAPS aid without using the land at all for farming. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo primere, ko so kmetje najeli prostrana polnaravna travinja in prejeli plačila pomoči iz SEPP, ne da bi zemljišča sploh uporabljali za kmetovanje.
In addition, this absence of any agricultural activity adversely affects the environmental value of that type of land (Picture 4). 
Poleg tega je neizvajanje kmetijske dejavnosti negativno vplivalo na okoljsko vrednost tovrstnih zemljišč (fotografija 4).
Picture 4 — Unutilised semi-natural grassland in Hungary Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States © European Court of Auditors. © European Court of Auditors. 
Fotografija 4 – Polnaravno travinje na Madžarskem, ki ni v uporabi Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah © Evropsko računsko sodišče © Evropsko računsko sodišče.
The assessment of whether a parcel is eligible or not for SAPS payments depends on whether and how clearly Member States have further defined the conditions for eligibility and the minimum standards of agricultural activity, how reliably the national authorities can establish the status of that parcel as at 30 June 2003, and how closely they check the situation. 
Ocena upravičenosti parcele do plačil iz SEPP je odvisna od tega, ali so države članice dodatno opredelile pogoje za upravičenost in minimalne standarde za kmetijsko dejavnost ter kako jasno so to storile, kako zanesljivo lahko nacionalni organi ugotovijo status parcele 30. junija 2003 ter kako skrbno preverjajo stanje.