natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
9. for each programme period, the commission issues guidelines for the implementation of the funds. for the 2000–06 period, the guidelines issued in 1999 make it a priority to support compliance with the environmental standards established in the relevant EU directives. they specify that projects in the water sector ‘should be consistent with the principles of the proposed water framework directive’ and that ‘there should be more emphasis on increasing the efficiency of existing infrastructure with a view to limiting losses’9. 
9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito? 9. komisija za vsako programsko obdobje izda smernice za izvajanje dejavnosti skladov. v smernicah za obdobje 2000–2006, izdanih leta 1999, je prednostna naloga podpora skladnosti z okoljskimi standardi, predpisanimi v relevantnih direktivah eu.
In addition, the guide to the cohesion fund indicates that ‘all the investments in water supply should be accompanied by a concrete action plan to limit water losses from the distribution system to an optimal percentage for the efficiency of the system’10. 
Smernice določajo, da morajo biti projekti v vodnem sektorju skladni z načeli predlagane okvirne direktive o vodah in da je treba dati večji poudarek povečanju učinkovitosti obstoječe infrastrukture, da se omejijo izgube9. poleg tega je v vodniku po kohezijskem skladu navedeno, da mora biti za vsako naložbo v oskrbo z vodo pripravljen konkreten akcijski načrt za omejitev izgub vode iz distribucijskega sistema na optimalen odstotek za učinkovitost sistema10.
10. co-financed infrastructures are of various types. the ‘water supply systems’ scheme in Annex I gives a description of the components of the water systems, from abstraction (bulk water supply systems) to distribution to end users (distribution networks), and Box 1 gives some examples of co-financed projects. the most common elements of the water supply systems are: dams, desalination plants, water treatment plants, water mains, pumping stations, reservoirs, water tanks, distribution networks, and remote control and detection systems for leaks and breakdowns. 
10. Sofinancirane infrastrukture so različnih vrst. v shemi sistemov oskrbe z vodo v Prilogi I so opisani sestavni deli vodovodnih sistemov od črpanja (sistemi množične oskrbe z vodo) do distribucije končnim uporabnikom (distribucijska omrežja), v okviru 1 pa je navedenih nekaj primerov sofinanciranih projektov.
9 the structural funds and their coordination with the cohesion fund — guidelines for programmes in the period 2000–06. communication of the commission (oj c 267, 22.9.1999, p. 
9 The Structural Funds and their coordination with the Cohesion Fund-Guidelines for programmes in the period 2000–2006 (Strukturni skladi in njihova koordinacija s kohezijskim skladom – Smernice za programe v obdobju 2000–2006). Sporočilo komisije (uL c 267, 22.9.1999, str. 2).
2). quoted in page 6. 
Navedeno na strani 6.
10 guide to the cohesion fund 2000–06 , annex a, Ec, version 1.0, february 2000, pp. 9–10. 
10 vodnik po kohezijskem skladu 2000–2006, priloga A, eS, različica 1.0, februar 2000, str.
12 box 1 ExamPlEs of ProjEcts co-fInancEd by thE Eu one project aimed to extend the public water supply network to the population of rural districts which were using private and dispersed sources. the project consisted of 11 water tanks, 32,6 km of pipes for the connection of the new network to the bulk water supply system, 10 pumping stations and about 87 km of pipes for the new distribution network. the cost of the project eligible for EU assistance was 4,28 million euro, with 3,21 million euro of Erdf co-financing. a series of projects was designed to create new water sources and to improve the water treatment in a bulk water supply system covering an area of 11 000 km2 and 2,5 million inhabitants. 
9 in 10. 12 OkVIr 1 PrImerI PrOjektOV, kI jIh je sOfInancIrala eU cilj enega projekta je bil razširiti javno omrežje oskrbe z vodo, da bo dostopno tudi za prebivalstvo podeželskih območij, kjer so se uporabljali zasebni in razpršeni viri. projekt je zajemal 11 rezervoarjev za vodo, 32,6 km cevi za povezavo novega omrežja s sistemom množične oskrbe z vodo, deset črpališč in približno 87 km cevi za novo distribucijsko omrežje.
It consists of various co-financed projects: a desalination plant with a capacity of 65 000 m3 of water per day at an eligible cost of 55,10 million euro, with 46,86 million euro of cf co-financing; the renewal of a treatment plant with a capacity of 116 640 m3 of water per day at an eligible cost of 5,38 million euro, with 3,50 million euro of Erdf co-financing; and the construction of a water main of 27 km and three associated water tanks connecting the bulk water supply system with another desalination plant at an eligible cost of 19,71 million euro, with 12,81 million euro of Erdf co-financing. special report no 9/2010 – Is EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? 
Med njimi so bili: obrat za razsoljevanje z zmogljivostjo 65 000 m3 vode na dan z upravičenimi stroški v višini 55,10 milijona eur, s prispevkom 46,86 milijona eur iz kohezijskega sklada; obnova čistilne naprave z zmogljivostjo 116 640 m3 vode na dan z upravičenimi stroški v višini 5,38 milijona eur, s prispevkom 3,50 milijona eur iz eSrr ter izgradnja 27-kilometrskega vodovoda in treh povezanih rezervoarjev za vodo, ki so sistem množične oskrbe z vodo povezali z drugim obratom za razsoljevanje z upravičenimi stroški v višini 19,71 milijona eur, s prispevkom 12,81 milijona eur iz eSrr. posebno poročilo št. 9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito?
somE ProjEcts co-fInancEd by thE Eu 13 Picture 1: Pumping station in Portugal Picture 2: Desalination plant in Spain Picture 3: Dam in Spain Picture 4: Treatment plant in Greece special report no 9/2010 – Is EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? 
nekaterI PrOjektI, kI jIh je sOfInancIrala eU 13 Fotografija 1: črpališče na Portugalskem Fotografija 2: obrat za razsoljevanje v Španiji Fotografija 3: jez v Španiji Fotografija 4: čistilna naprava v Grčiji posebno poročilo št. 9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito?
14 aUdIt scopE and objEctIvEs 11. the main objective of the audit was to assess whether EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption is used to best effect. 
14 obSeg IN cILjI revIzIje 11. glavni cilj revizije je bil oceniti, ali so bila sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo učinkovito porabljena. 12.
12. the court addressed the following sub-questions: (a) were the most appropriate solutions adopted in order to meet the needs of the areas concerned? (b) have the projects achieved their aims of improving the supply of water for domestic consumption? (c) have the objectives been achieved at the lowest cost to the EU budget? 
Sodišče je obravnavalo naslednja podvprašanja: (a) Ali so bile sprejete najprimernejše rešitve za zadovoljevanje potreb zadevnih območij? (b) Ali so projekti dosegli svoje cilje izboljšanja oskrbe z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo? (c) Ali so bili rezultati doseženi z najnižjimi mogočimi stroški za proračun eu?
13. the audit was carried out at the commission and in the four Member states which account for most of the expenditure on infrastructure exclusively dedicated to water supply for domestic use: spain, greece, portugal and Italy. 
13. revizija je bila izvedena na komisiji in v štirih državah članicah, ki so prejele večino sredstev za infrastrukturo, namenjeno izključno oskrbi z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo: v Španiji, grčiji, na portugalskem in v Italiji.
It was conducted from february 2009 to March 2010, on the basis of a sample of 29 projects financed under the 2000–06 programme period and physically completed. three of them were approved by the commission before 2000, but all three were substantially modified by commission decisions during the 2000–06 period. the projects were selected in proportion to the size of the total financial support provided to each of the four Member states. nine were co-financed by the cf and 20 by the Erdf, two of which were major projects7 (see Annex II). 
14. revizija je potekala od februarja 2009 do marca 2010 na podlagi vzorca z 29 fizično zaključenimi projekti, ki so se financirali v okviru programskega obdobja 2000–2006. tri od njih je odobrila komisija pred letom 2000, vendar so bili vsi trije znatno spremenjeni z odločitvami komisije v obdobju 2000–2006. projekti so bili izbrani sorazmerno z obsegom skupne finančne podpore, ki jo je prejela vsaka od štirih držav članic. devet projektov je bilo sofinanciranih iz kohezijskega sklada, 20 pa iz eSrr, med njimi sta bila dva velika projekta7 (glej Prilogo II). 15.
15. project files were reviewed at all levels and meetings were held with representatives of various local authorities and public or mixed companies responsible for the design, implementation and management of the infrastructures related to the selected projects. the court was assisted by experts in water supply engineering. special report no 9/2010 – Is EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? 
Sodišče je pregledalo projektno dokumentacijo na vseh ravneh in se sestalo s predstavniki različnih lokalnih organov in javnih podjetij ali javno-zasebnih partnerstev, ki so bili odgovorni za načrtovanje, izvedbo in upravljanje infrastrukture, povezane z izbranimi projekti. pri tem so mu pomagali strokovnjaki za področje vodnega inženiringa. posebno poročilo št. 9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito?
15 obsErvatIons WErE thE most aPProPrIatE solutIons adoPtEd In ordEr to mEEt thE nEEds of thE arEas concErnEd? 
15 opAžANjA alI sO bIle sPrejete najPrImernejše rešItVe za zadOVOljeVanje POtreb zadeVnIh ObmOčIj?
16. the commitment of financial resources to the building of new infrastructure, which is often expected to be used for several decades, should be preceded by an analysis aiming at finding the best solution to local water supply needs. the main elements of such an analysis are the demand forecast, calculated mainly from the size of the population and the expected per capita consumption, and the availability and quality of existing water resources. some of these elements, such as per capita consumption and the quality of existing water resources, may be influenced by demand side measures and actions for water resource protection respectively. 
16. pred prevzemanjem obveznosti za finančne vire za izgradnjo nove infrastrukture, za katero se pogosto pričakuje, da bo v uporabi nekaj desetletij, bi bilo treba izvesti analizo, da se najde najboljša rešitev za lokalne potrebe oskrbe z vodo. glavni elementi te analize so napoved povpraševanja, izračunana predvsem na podlagi števila prebivalcev in pričakovane porabe na prebivalca, ter dostopnost in kakovost obstoječih vodnih virov. Na nekatere od teh elementov je mogoče vplivati, na porabo na prebivalca na primer z ukrepi, usmerjenimi na povpraševanje, na kakovost obstoječih vodnih virov pa z ukrepi za zaščito vodnih virov.
17. the court examined whether: (a) the estimates of water needs underpinning co-financed infrastructure projects were based on well-founded assumptions about the evolution of demand and water availability in the area concerned; (b) various potential solutions, including action to affect demand or to maintain or improve the quality of the water resources currently used, had been adequately analysed in order to select the best one; (c) the authorities in charge of assessing applications and approving grants have added value to the projects proposed. special report no 9/2010 – Is EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? 
17. Sodišče je preučilo, ali: (a) so ocene potreb po vodi, na katerih temeljijo sofinancirani projekti izgradnje infrastrukture, izdelane na podlagi dobro utemeljenih predpostavk o razvoju povpraševanja in dostopnosti vode na zadevnih območjih; (b) so bile različne mogoče rešitve, vključno z ukrepi za vplivanje na povpraševanje ali za ohranjanje ali izboljšanje kakovosti obstoječih vodnih virov, ustrezno analizirane, da se izbere najboljša; (c) so organi, zadolženi za oceno vlog za donacije in njihovo odobritev, predlaganim projektom dodali vrednost. posebno poročilo št.
16 In almost all casEs, forEcasts of nEEds dId not takE Into account doWnWard trEnds In PEr caPIta WatEr consumPtIon, and In somE casEs, not all rEsourcEs alrEady aVaIlablE WErE consIdErEd 18. the decision to build new infrastructure for water supply was, in all but three projects, based on estimates of future demand and of the need for supplementary water resources. 
16 V skOraj nObenI naPOVedI POtreb nI bIl UPOšteVan trend zmanjšeVanja POrabe VOde na PrebIValca, V nekaterIh PrImerIh Pa nItI VsI že dOstOPnI VIrI 18. odločitev o izgradnji nove infrastrukture za oskrbo z vodo je pri vseh razen treh projektih temeljila na ocenah prihodnjega povpraševanja in potrebe po dopolnilnih vodnih virih. pri treh izjemah te ocene niso bile potrebne, saj so se naložbe nanašale le na dodajanje ali zamenjavo elementov na obstoječem sistemu.
In 21 cases, demand was estimated on the basis of theoretical per capita consumption recommended by hydrological planning documents, given the lack of data on consumption and losses from the networks in the past. the demand estimated in this way was sometimes adjusted upwards using various factors that are difficult to evaluate, such as the effect of temporary populations11 and industrialisation rate. 
19. v 21 primerih je bilo prihodnje povpraševanje ocenjeno na podlagi teoretične porabe na prebivalca, priporočene v dokumentih za načrtovanje upravljanja z vodnimi viri, saj ni bilo podatkov o pretekli porabi in izgubah iz omrežja. tako ocenjeno povpraševanje je bilo včasih prilagojeno navzgor, in sicer z uporabo različnih dejavnikov, ki jih je težko ovrednotiti, kot sta učinek začasnih populacij11 in stopnja industrializacije.
20. In the other five cases, water demand forecasts were estimated on the basis of data about real past consumption, but applying different methods. In three of these cases, the per capita consumption used to justify the need for the project is higher than the one recommended by hydrological planning documents. 
20. v ostalih petih primerih so bile napovedi povpraševanja ocenjene na podlagi podatkov o dejanski pretekli porabi, vendar so se uporabljale različne metode. v treh od teh petih primerov je poraba na prebivalca, s katero je bila utemeljena potreba po izvedbi projekta, višja od priporočene v dokumentih za načrtovanje upravljanja z vodnimi viri.
21. Moreover, in almost all the projects, the demand estimates do not reflect the downward trend in per capita consumption and, sometimes, in water losses that has taken place since the end of the 1990s or early 2000s in most of the areas concerned by the projects12. this trend is a result of improvements in the networks13, the installation of domestic meters and awareness campaigns promoted by water authorities and operators. as the implementation of such demand side measures is becoming more widespread, an increasing trend of per capita consumption is unlikely14. 
21. poleg tega ocene povpraševanja pri skoraj nobenem projektu ne odražajo trenda zmanjševanja porabe vode na prebivalca in včasih niti trenda zmanjševanja izgub vode od konca 1990-ih ali začetka 2000-ih na večini območij, ki jih ti projekti zade-vajo12. ta trend je rezultat izboljšav v omrežjih13, namestitve gospodinjskih vodomerov in kampanj za ozaveščanje, ki so jih spodbujali organi in upravljavci, pristojni za oskrbo z vodo. ker se vedno bolj izvajajo takšni ukrepi v zvezi s povpraševanjem, ni verjetno, da se bo poraba vode na prebivalca večala14.
11 temporary (transient) population refers to tourists, commuting and seasonal workers, i.e. all non-resident persons. 
11 Izraz začasna (prehodna) populacija se nanaša na turiste, vozače in sezonske delavce, tj. vse osebe, ki na določenem območju nimajo stalnega prebivališča.
12 for example, in four big cities, the downward trend in per capita consumption is so sharp that, despite population increase, the overall water consumption has decreased between 1 % and 29 % since the end of the 1990s. 
12 vštirihvelikihmestihnaprimer je trend zmanjševanja porabe vode na prebivalca tako močen, da se je skupna poraba vode kljub povečanju populacije od konca 1990-ih zmanjšala za od 1 % do 29 %.
In a densely populated coastal area, the same trend has been observed since the early 2000s. Eight projects examined are located in these areas. 
Na gosto poseljenem obalnem območju je enak trend opažen od začetka 2000-ih. osem pregledanih projektov se nahaja na teh območjih.
13 Improvementsinthenetworks result in reduced losses. losses are considered as being part of the demand as they need to be covered by the total water production. 
13 zaradiizboljšavvomrežjusose zmanjšale izgube, ki se štejejo za del povpraševanja, ker jih je treba pokriti pri pridobivanju vode.
14 see also communication from the commission ‘addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts in the European Union’, coM(2007) 414 final and final report from the commission to the council and the European parliament on the ‘follow-up to the communication on water scarcity and droughts in the European Union’, coM(2008) 875. special report no 9/2010 – Is EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? 
14 glej tudi Sporočilo komisije „obravnavanje izziva pomanjkanja vode in suše v evropski uniji“, coM(2007) 414 konč., in končno poročilo komisije Svetu in evropskemu parlamentu „poročilo o spremljanju Sporočila o pomanjkanju vode in suši v evropski uniji“, coM(2008) 875. posebno poročilo št. 9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito?
22. as a result, a comparison between forecasts of future demand and actual consumption very often shows that (see Table 2 for some examples): (a) actual per capita consumption in 200815 is significantly lower than the estimate for the horizon year, and in several cases, it is even less than half of this estimate; (b) actual overall consumption in 2008 is much lower than estimated. 
22. zato se pri primerjavi napovedi prihodnjega povpraševanja in dejanske porabe pogosto pokaže, da (glej Tabelo 2, kjer je navedenih nekaj primerov): (a) je bila dejanska poraba na prebivalca v letu 200815 bistveno manjša, kot je bilo ocenjeno za konec načrtovalnega obdobja, v nekaj primerih pa je celo za več kot polovico manjša od ocenjene; (b) je bila dejanska skupna poraba v letu 2008 veliko manjša, kot je bilo ocenjeno.
15 themostrecentdataavailableat the time of the audit. 
15 Najnovejšipodatki,kisobili na voljo v času revizije.
17 tablE 2 Project Per capita consumption in l/day Overall consumption in hm3/year Country Horizon year Estimated ex-ante for the horizon year 1 Actual in 2008 1 Estimated ex-ante Actual For the horizon year For 20082 In 2008 ES 2027 530 286 26 24 14 GR 2020 375–609 197 219 180 90 IT 2040 432 360 178 149 90 PT 2030 154–300 34–66 25 15 6 PT 2038 150 74 0,6 0,4 0,1 ES 2030 350 201–291 8,5 no data 4,3 WatEr consumPtIon EstImatEs and actual ValuEs In 2008 for somE ProjEcts ExamInEd 1 per capita consumption includes peaks, losses and industrial coefficient. 
17 tabela 2 Projekt Poraba na prebivalca v l/dan Skupna poraba v hm3/leto Država Konec načrtovalnega obdobja Predhodna ocena za konec načrtovalnega obdobja1 Dejanska poraba v letu 20081 Predhodna ocena Dejanska poraba Za konec načrtovalnega obdobja Za leto 20082 V letu 2008 ES 2027 530 286 26 24 14 GR 2020 375–609 197 219 180 90 IT 2040 432 360 178 149 90 PT 2030 154–300 34–66 25 15 6 PT 2038 150 74 0,6 0,4 0,1 ES 2030 350 201–291 8,5 ni podatka 4,3 Ocene POrabe VOde In dejanske VrednOstI Iz leta 2008 za nekaj PreGledanIh PrOjektOV 1 v porabo na prebivalca so zajeti obdobja največje porabe, izgube in industrijski koeficient.
2 the overall consumption estimates for 2008 were indicated in the project studies or calculated by the court on the basis of population and per capita consumption trends shown in these studies. special report no 9/2010 – Is EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? 
2 Splošne ocene porabe za leto 2008 so bile navedene v projektnih študijah ali pa jih je na osnovi populacije in trenda, ki so ga za porabo na prebivalca pokazale študije, izračunalo Sodišče. posebno poročilo št. 9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito?
23. resources already available were not fully taken into account in the design of new infrastructure in six cases (see Box 2). In particular, where water was of poor quality, for example because of high nitrates or sulphates content, it was not examined whether this water could have been mixed with water of good quality in order to meet the regulatory standards for drinking water, instead of being fully replaced by water from another source16. 
23. v šestih primerih se že dostopni viri niso popolnoma upoštevali pri načrtovanju nove infrastrukture (glej Okvir 2). predvsem na območjih z vodo slabe kakovosti, na primer zaradi visoke vsebnosti nitratov ali sulfatov, ni bilo preverjeno, ali je mogoče to vodo mešati z vodo dobre kakovosti, da bi izpolnili predpisane standarde za pitno vodo, namesto da se v celoti nadomesti z vodo iz drugega vira16.
24. a better estimation of future demand and water deficits could have made it possible to consider alternative solutions which were not taken into account and build smaller capacity infrastructure. 
24. boljša ocena prihodnjega povpraševanja in primanjkljaja vode bi omogočila razmislek o alternativnih rešitvah, ki se niso upoštevale, in izgradnjo infrastrukture z manjšo zmogljivostjo.
16 directive 98/83/Ec sets parametric values for such substances as sulphate and nitrate salts in water intended for human consumption. when the salt concentration exceeds these values, it is common practice to dilute the water with other (available) water from low salinity sources. 
16 direktiva 98/83/eS določa posamezne vrednosti parametrov za snovi, kot so nitratne in sulfatne soli, v vodi, namenjeni za prehrano ljudi. ko koncentracija soli preseže te vrednosti, se vodo običajno razredči z drugo (dostopno) vodo iz virov z nizko slanostjo.
18 box 2 ExamPlEs of ProjEcts WhErE aVaIlablE rEsourcEs WErE IGnorEd In thE PlannInG PhasE In spain, the Erdf co-financed a project to improve the quality of water supplied to various neighbouring municipalities, as current water supply did not comply with regulatory parameters. the estimates of water volume to be provided by the new infrastructures were based upon the estimate of total future demand for the area. nevertheless, some of the municipalities had water of excellent quality and experienced no shortages. furthermore, the project could have been based on the estimate of the volume of good quality water required to achieve the appropriate mix with the low quality water already available. four years after commissioning, the rate of use of the new capacity is around 16 %. 
18 OkVIr 2 PrImera PrOjektOV, PrI katerIh se V načrtOValnI fazI nIsO UPOšteValI že dOstOPnI VIrI eSrr je v Španiji sofinanciral projekt za izboljšanje kakovosti vode za oskrbo različnih bližnjih občin, ker obstoječa oskrba z vodo ni bila v skladu s predpisanimi parametri. ocene količine vode, ki bi jo bilo treba zagotoviti s pomočjo nove infrastrukture, so temeljile na oceni skupnega prihodnjega povpraševanja za celotno območje. vendar so imele nekatere občine zelo kakovostno vodo, ki je ni nikoli zmanjkalo. poleg tega bi projekt lahko temeljil na oceni potrebne količine vode dobre kakovosti, da se pridobi primerna mešanica z vodo slabe kakovosti, ki je že na voljo.