natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These factors include suitability of land, market circumstances, the extent of competition from third countries and consumer tastes. 
Ti dejavniki vključujejo primernost zemljišč, tržne okoliščine, obseg konkurence iz tretjih držav in okus potrošnikov.
20 GRAPH 2 TREND IN SHEEP AND GOAT NUMBERS FOR COUPLED AND DECOUPLED MEMBER STATES 2000–10 120 110 100 90 80 70 Sheep and Goat Indice Trends (2000=100) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Coupled MSs Decoupled MSs EU-15 Source: Based on Eurostat data. 
20 120 110 100 90 80 70 2000 Trendi kazalnikov za ovce in koze (2000 = 100) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Države članice z vezano pomočjo Države članice z nevezano pomočjo EU-15 Vir: na podlagi podatkov Eurostata.
These exogenous and contextual factors have such a strong overall effect that the audited schemes either lose their effect, where these factors are positive, or cannot reverse the situation, where these factors are negative. 
Ti zunanji dejavniki in okoliščine imajo tako močan splošni učinek, da revidirani shemi izgubita pomen, kadar so ti dejavniki pozitivni, ali pa ne moreta spremeniti položaja, kadar so negativni.
This is supported both by the Court’s analysis of long-term trends of animal numbers in individual Member States (see Box 5) and by the Commission’s evaluations and other studies34. 
To je bilo ugotovljeno tako pri analizi dolgoročnih trendov gibanja števila živali v posameznih državah članicah, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče (glej okvir 5), kot tudi pri ocenah Komisije in drugih raziskavah34.
34 Commission’s Evaluation Report (2010): ‘Evaluation of Market Effects of Partial Decoupling’, p. 
34 Ocenjevalno poročilo Komisije (2010): Ocena učinkov delno nevezanih pomoči na trge, str.
Ministry of Agriculture in Spain: ‘Analysis for possible decoupling of bovine premiums (suckler cow premium and slaughter premium)’. 
Špansko ministrstvo za kmetijstvo: Analiza morebitne uvedbe nevezanih premij za govedo (premije za krave dojilje in klavne premije).
21 BOX 4 EXAMPLE OF INTEGRATING THE EWE AND GOAT SCHEMES INTO THE SPS AND PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC SUPPORT TO THE SHEEP AND GOAT SECTOR As of 2010, France fully decoupled the sheep premiums and designed a more focused and targeted specific support scheme to replace the ewe and goat scheme under partial implementation of SPS, on the basis of technical and economic selection criteria. 
21 OKVIR 4 PRIMER VKLJUČEVANJA SHEM ZA OVCE IN KOZE V SEP IN ZAGOTAVLJANJA DODATNE POSEBNE PODPORE SEKTORJU OVČJEGA IN KOZJEGA MESA Francija je z letom 2010 uvedla v celoti nevezane premije ter na podlagi tehničnih in ekonomskih izbirnih meril zasnovala bolj osredotočeno in usmerjeno shemo posebne podpore, ki je zamenjala shemo za ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja SEP.
This was done in the framework of Article 68(1)(b) and in combination with SPS aid (i.e. total payments in addition to SPS of about 135 million euro in 2010). 
To je storila na podlagi člena 68(1)(b) in v kombinaciji s pomočjo iz SEP (skupna plačila poleg SEP so v letu 2010 znašala okrog 135 milijonov EUR).
An effect of this policy change on beneficiaries is shown in the following case: A farmer located in Auvergne, who raised sheep on a farm located at more than 1 000 metres altitude where other economic alternatives are limited, experienced a gain of 15 000 euro in aid between 2006 (partial decoupling: 50 % of the ewe premium) and 2010 (full decoupling of the premiums plus Article 63 and 68 specific support). 
Učinek te spremembe politike na upravičence ponazarja naslednji primer. Kmetu v regiji Auvergne, ki je redil ovce na kmetiji na nadmorski višini več kot 1 000 metrov, kjer so druge gospodarske možnosti omejene, se je pomoč med letoma 2006 (delna nevezanost: 50 % premije za ovce) in 2010 (uvedba v celoti nevezanih premij v kombinaciji s posebno podporo iz členov 63 in 68) povečala za 15 000 EUR.
However, the farmer’s production remained constant during this period, ranging from 612 to 653 sheep. 
Njegova proizvodnja pa je v tem obdobju ostala nespremenjena in je znašala od 612 do 653 ovac.
BOX 5 EXAMPLE OF STRONG EFFECTS ON ANIMAL PRODUCTION OF EXOGENOUS FACTORS Portugal, a Member State using partial implementation of SPS, has experienced positive trends in suckler cow numbers due to a programme to convert arable land to pasture in 1994 in order to favour animal farming and the allocation of an additional 90 000 animal entitlements that increased the national suckler cow quota. Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
OKVIR 5 PRIMER MOČNEGA UČINKA ZUNANJIH DEJAVNIKOV NA ŽIVINOREJO Na Portugalskem, v državi članici, ki delno izvaja SEP, so zabeležili pozitivne trende gibanja števila krav dojilj zaradi programa iz leta 1994 za spreminjanje obdelovalnih površin v pašnike, s katerim so želeli podpreti živinorejo, in dodelitve dodatnih 90 000 pravic do plačila za živali, s katero se je povečala nacionalna kvota za krave dojilje. Posebno poročilo št.
22 HEADAGE-BASED PREMIUMS THAT ARE NOT LINKED TO OTHER CONDITIONS DO NOT PROVIDE INCENTIVES TO IMPROVE COMPETITIVENESS 31. 
22 PREMIJE NA GLAVO ŽIVINE, KI NISO VEZANE NA DRUGE POGOJE, NE SPODBUJAJO IZBOLJŠANJA KONKURENČNOSTI 31.
The retention of coupled aid is a transitional measure to support farmers in sensitive areas but, according to the Commission, was not intended to compromise the overall direction of the reform towards decoupling and more market orientation by producers. 
Ohranitev vezane pomoči je prehoden ukrep za podporo kmetom na občutljivih območjih, ki naj bi po navedbah Komisije ne ogrozil splošne smeri reforme, ki vodi proti nevezani pomoči in večji tržni usmerjenosti proizvajalcev.
However, a support scheme that pays premiums on a headage basis without any other specific conditions does not provide immediate incentives for farmers to improve their competitiveness. 
Toda shema podpore, v okviru katere se premije izplačujejo na glavo živine neodvisno od drugih posebnih pogojev, ne predstavlja neposredne spodbude kmetom za izboljšanje njihove konkurenčnosti.
In contrast, linking the headage payments to quality improvements as practised by certain Member States (e.g. Ireland and United Kingdom — Scotland), has the potential to be a more effective support measure which encourages both the maintenance of production as well as the desired increased market orientation. 
Nasprotno pa je lahko možnost, pri kateri se plačila na glavo živine vežejo na izboljšanje kakovosti in ki jo uporabljajo nekatere države članice (npr. Irska in Združeno kraljestvo – Škotska), učinkovitejši podporni ukrep, ki spodbuja ohranjanje proizvodnje ter želeno večjo tržno usmerjenost.
Such an approach would also address a fundamental problem highlighted in the impact assessment carried out in the context of the ‘Health Check of the CAP’, notably, the fact that partially coupled support is ‘often preventing farmers to achieve further competitiveness and market orientation. 
Tak pristop obravnava tudi temeljno težavo, ki je bila poudarjena v oceni učinka, izvedeni v okviru pregleda stanja SKP, in sicer dejstvo, da delno vezana pomoč kmetom pogosto preprečuje, da bi dosegli večjo konkurenčnost in tržno usmerjenost.
Moreover, in the case of non profitable sectors farmers are worse off than farmers in a full decoupling situation receiving lower payments’35. 
Poleg tega so v nedonosnih sektorjih kmetje v slabšem položaju kot tisti, za katere velja popolna nevezanost, saj prejemajo nižja plačila35.
The continuation of the audited schemes was also intended to mitigate the negative social, economic and environmental consequences of restructuring due to decoupling, i.e. full implementation of SPS in these sectors. 
Namen nadaljnjega izvajanja revidiranih shem je bila tudi omilitev negativnih socialnih, gospodarskih in okoljskih posledic prestrukturiranja zaradi uvedbe nevezanih plačil, tj. zaradi izvajanja SEP v celoti v teh sektorjih.
The audit compared trends in relevant proxy indicators (meat production, number of beneficiaries and animals per farm and area under permanent pasture) for Member States using full decoupling and those using partial implementation of SPS, in order to help determine the extent of such negative consequences under decoupling. 
Zaradi ugotavljanja obsega negativnih posledic uvedbe nevezanih plačil so bili pri reviziji primerjani trendi ustreznih posrednih kazalnikov (proizvodnja mesa, število upravičencev in živali na kmetijo ter površina, ki se uporablja kot trajni pašnik) za države članice, ki uporabljajo v celoti nevezano pomoč, in za tiste, ki delno izvajajo SEP.
35 CAP Health Check — impact assessment note No 3, p. 
35 Pregled stanja SKP – dokument o oceni učinka št. 3, str.
23 NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN MEAT PRODUCTION TRENDS BETWEEN MEMBER STATES WHICH USE THE AUDITED SCHEMES AND THOSE WHICH DO NOT 34. 
23 MED DRŽAVAMI ČLANICAMI, KI UPORABLJAJO REVIDIRANI SHEMI, IN TISTIMI, KI JU NE UPORABLJAJO, NI BISTVENE RAZLIKE V TRENDIH PROIZVODNJE MESA 34.
The audit found no discernible difference in the trends observed in meat production between those Member States which maintain the audited schemes coupled (i.e. as before the reform) and those which have fully integrated these premiums into the SPS (see Annex II for meat production trends). 
Pri reviziji niso bile ugotovljene vidne razlike v trendih proizvodnje mesa med državami članicami, ki so v revidiranih shemah ohranile vezanost plačil (tj. kot so bila pred reformo), in tistimi, ki so te premije v celoti vključile v SEP (za trende proizvodnje mesa glej Prilogo II).
While only one third of EU beef production is directly related to suckler cows, nevertheless these trends provide an indication that decoupling of the audited schemes has not had a significant impact on meat production. 
Sicer je le tretjina celotne proizvodnje govejega mesa v EU neposredno povezana s kravami dojiljami, vendar pa ti trendi kažejo, da uvajanje nevezane pomoči v revidiranih shemah ni imelo bistvenega vpliva na proizvodnjo mesa.
These trends are again strongly influenced by exogenous and contextual factors, including restructuring currently taking place at both farm (e.g. exit of unsustainable farms, higher concentration of animals per farm) and industry level (e.g. supermarket chains entering the market directly as customers, merger of slaughterhouses, etc.). 
Na te trende pa močno vplivajo zunanji dejavniki in okoliščine, vključno s sedanjim prestrukturiranjem na ravni kmetij (npr. izginjanje nedonosnih kmetij, večja koncentracija živali na kmetijo) in industrije (npr. verige supermarketov vstopajo na trg neposredno kot stranke, združevanje klavnic itn.).
As an illustration of these contextual factors, there was evidence that the organisation of the agri-food production chain strongly affects the processing industry. 
Za ponazoritev dejavnikov, vezanih na okoliščine, obstajajo dokazi, da organizacija agroživilske proizvodne verige močno vpliva na predelovalno industrijo.
For example, in Portugal, where 75 % of farms are classified as ‘very small’, the national authorities noted the weak bargaining power of small and fragmented livestock farmers vis-à-vis suppliers and customers as factors limiting the productivity of the sector. 
Na Portugalskem, kjer je 75 % kmetij uvrščenih med „zelo majhne“ kmetije, so nacionalni organi ugotovili, da imajo majhni in razdrobljeni živinorejci majhno pogajalsko moč v primerjavi z dobavitelji in strankami, in to dejstvo opredelili kot dejavnik, ki omejuje produktivnost tega sektorja.
This was exacerbated by the fact that slaughterhouses in Portugal provided only a slaughtering service, instead of playing a more prominent role in meat marketing. 
Ta položaj je še poslabšalo dejstvo, da so klavnice na Portugalskem zagotavljale zgolj klavniške storitve in niso imele pomembnejše vloge pri trženju mesa.
In contrast, in the United Kingdom after full implementation of SPS, the national authorities noted a shift towards improving herd productivity and farm competitiveness and efforts to expand livestock farmers’ market share and outputs via cooperatives. Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
Nasprotno pa so nacionalni organi v Združenem kraljestvu po uveljavitvi SEP v celoti opazili, da se trend premika k izboljšanju produktivnosti črede in konkurenčnosti kmetij ter prizadevanju za povečevanje tržnega deleža živinorejcev in njihove proizvodnje s pomočjo zadrug. Posebno poročilo št.
GRAPH 3 MEAT PRODUCTION – COMPARISON OF MEMBER STATES USING THE PREMIUMS AND THOSE WHICH DO NOT 20 % 15 % 10 % 5% 0% -5 % -10 % -15 % -20 % 10 % 0% -10 % -20 % -30 % -40 % -50 % Coupled Decoupled Variation of cattle meat production (2009 vs average 2003-05) 24 Variation of sheep and goat meat production (2009 vs average 2003-05) Coupled Decoupled Source: Based on Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) Statistical Year Book 2010, Table B.10. 
20 % 15 % 10 % 5% 0% -5 % -10 % -15 % -20 % 10 % 0% -10 % -20 % -30 % -40 % -50 % vezana pomoč nevezana pomoč 24 DIAGRAM 3 PROIZVODNJA MESA – PRIMERJAVA MED DRŽAVAMI ČLANICAMI, KI UPORABLJAJO PREMIJE, IN TISTIMI, KI JIH NE UPORABLJAJO Spremembe v prireji govejega mesa (leto 2009 v primerjavi s povprečjem obdobja 2003–2005) Spremembe v prireji ovčjega in kozjega mesa (leto 2009 v primerjavi s povprečjem obdobja 2003–2005) vezana pomoč nevezana pomoč Vir: Na podlagi tabele B.10 iz statističnega letopisa 2010 Organizacije Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO).
25 SIMILARITIES IN CERTAIN RELEVANT SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRENDS ACROSS ALL MEMBER STATES 37. 
25 PODOBNOSTI MED DRŽAVAMI ČLANICAMI GLEDE NEKATERIH SOCIALNIH IN OKOLJSKIH TRENDOV 37.
In the audited Member States, there has been an overall decrease in the number of suckler cow and sheep and goat beneficiaries, in line with the overall trend in agriculture, with less competitive farmers leaving the sector. 
V revidiranih državah članicah je na splošno prišlo do zmanjšanja števila upravičencev do pomoči za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze, saj so manj konkurenčni kmetje izstopili iz sektorja, kar je v skladu s splošnim trendom v kmetijstvu.
Such a decrease can have adverse impacts, for example, a reduction in farm employment, economic consequences for rural communities and negative environmental effects. 
Takšno zmanjšanje ima lahko negativne učinke, kot so zmanjšanje zaposlenosti na kmetijah, ekonomske posledice za podeželske skupnosti in negativni vplivi na okolje.
However, these potential impacts have been largely offset by the general trend across the EU of increasing the number of maintained animals per farm (see Annex III), with the more competitive farmers taking over part of the production factors of those who have left, in an attempt to increase their competitiveness and profitability by increasing their scale of production. 
Vendar pa so se morebitni negativni učinki večinoma izravnali s splošnim trendom povečevanja števila živali na kmetijo (glej Prilogo III), do katerega je prišlo, ker so bolj konkurenčni kmetje prevzeli del proizvodnje tistih, ki so jo opustili, zaradi povečanja konkurenčnosti in donosnosti svojih kmetij s povečanjem proizvodnje.
The maintenance of a minimum production requirement, such as that encouraged by the audited schemes, can play a role in providing environmental benefits such as decreasing fire risk and enhancing biodiversity. 
Ohranitev zahteve po minimalni proizvodnji, ki jo spodbujata revidirani shemi, lahko pripomore k zagotavljanju koristi za okolje, na primer k zmanjševanju požarne ogroženosti in povečevanju biotske raznovrstnosti.
For example, the Commission has already identified certain types of farming activities, such as extensive grazing systems, shepherding and transhumance36 of animals, which are linked to social and environmental impacts. 
Komisija je na primer že ugotovila, da so nekatere vrste kmetijskih dejavnosti, kot so sistemi ekstenzivne paše, pastirska ovčereja in sezonska paša36 živali, povezane s socialnimi in okoljskimi vplivi.
However, other EU policy instruments such as agri-environment or LFA measures or even EU regulatory requirements37 play a similar and complementary role. 
Vendar pa imajo podobno in dopolnilno vlogo tudi drugi instrumenti politik EU, kot so kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi ali ukrepi za območja z omejenimi možnostmi ali celo regulativne zahteve EU37.
These measures are also linked to the envisaged environmental impacts of the audited schemes. 
Ti ukrepi so povezani tudi z načrtovanimi okoljskimi učinki revidiranih shem.
It is therefore unclear to what extent the audited schemes, when applied across the whole of Member States’ territories, contribute to the avoidance of negative environmental consequences. 
Zato ni jasno, koliko revidirani shemi, če se uporabljata na celotnem ozemlju držav članic, pripomoreta k preprečevanju negativnih posledic za okolje.
This is corroborated by the fact that, in the decoupled Member States visited, there was no evidence of widespread environmental problems caused by land abandonment after decoupling of the audited schemes. 
To potrjuje tudi dejstvo, da v obiskanih državah članicah z nevezano pomočjo ni bilo dokazov o splošnih okoljskih težavah, do katerih bi prišlo zaradi opustitve zemljišč po uvedbi nevezanih plačil iz revidiranih shem.
Furthermore, the ‘permanent pasture area’ used by ruminant livestock (see Table 3), which can be used as an environmental indicator, has either been stable or has not severely declined across the EU Member States regardless of the choice to decouple the audited schemes or not. 
Poleg tega je „površina trajnih pašnikov“, ki se uporabljajo za prežveko-valce (glej tabelo 3), ki jo lahko uporabimo kot okoljski kazalnik, v vseh državah članicah EU ostala ustaljena ali pa se ni bistveno zmanjšala, ne glede na to, ali so se države odločile za uvedbo nevezane pomoči ali ne.
36 Seasonal moving of animal herds from one location to another. 
36 Sezonska selitev čred z ene lokacije na drugo.
37 E.g. Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 which stipulates that Member States should ensure that land which was under permanent pasture in 2003 should be maintained. 
37 Npr. člen 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, ki določa, da morajo države članice zagotoviti, da zemljišča, ki so se uporabljala kot trajni pašniki leta 2003, ostanejo trajni pašniki.
26 TABLE 3 TOTAL LAND DECLARED UNDER PERMANENT PASTURE DECLARED PERMANENT PASTURE AREA (1 000 hectares) EU-15 2006 2009 Percentage change (2009 vs 2006) Belgium1 459 458 – 0,2 % Denmark 225 215 – 4,4 % Spain1 5 695 6 001 5,4 % France1 8 103 8 106 0% Austria 1 437 1 397 – 2,8 % Portugal1 1 037 1 124 8,4 % Finland 22 19 – 15,1 % (A) Sub-totals (partial implementation of SPS Member States) 16 978 17 320 2,0 % Germany 4 925 4 798 – 2,6 % Ireland 4 264 4 233 – 0,7 % Greece 2 740 2 719 – 0,8 % Italy 2 303 2 325 1% Luxembourg 66 65 – 1,7 % Netherlands 813 832 2,4 % Sweden 800 713 – 11 % United Kingdom 9 919 9 796 – 1,2 % (B) Sub-totals (full implementation of SPS Member States) 25 830 25 481 – 1,4 % 1 Member States visited on the spot. 
11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP 26 TABELA 3 SKUPNA POVRŠINA ZEMLJIŠČ, KI SO PRIJAVLJENA KOT TRAJNI PAŠNIKI Prijavljena površina trajnih pašnikov (v 1 000 hektarih) EU-15 leto 2006 leto 2009 sprememba v odstotkih (primerjava med letoma 2009 in 2006) Belgija1 459 458 – 0,2 % Danska 225 215 – 4,4 % Španija1 5 695 6 001 5,4 % Francija1 8 103 8 106 0% Avstrija 1 437 1 397 – 2,8 % Portugalska1 1 037 1 124 8,4 % Finska 22 19 – 15,1 % A) Vmesne vsote (države članice, ki delno izvajajo SEP) 16 978 17 320 2,0 % Nemčija 4 925 4 798 – 2,6 % Irska 4 264 4 233 – 0,7 % Grčija 2 740 2 719 – 0,8 % Italija 2 303 2 325 1% Luksemburg 66 65 – 1,7 % Nizozemska 813 832 2,4 % Švedska 800 713 – 11 % Združeno kraljestvo 9 919 9 796 – 1,2 % B) Vmesne vsote (države članice, ki v celoti izvajajo SEP) 25 830 25 481 – 1,4 % 1 Države članice, obiskane na kraju samem.
Belgium, Spain, France, Austria and Portugal with suckler cow premiums and Denmark and Finland with ewe and goat premiums. 
Belgija, Španija, Francija, Avstrija in Portugalska s premijami za krave dojilje ter Danska in Finska s premijami za ovce in koze.
Portugal: see Box 5 for reasons of the increase. 
Portugalska: glej okvir 5 za razloge za porast.
Source: European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development DG. 
Vir: Evropska komisija, GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja.
Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements DECOUPLING OF THE PREMIUMS HAS ADVERSELY AFFECTED ANIMAL FARMING IN FRAGILE AREAS 41. 
11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP UVEDBA NEVEZANIH PREMIJ JE NEUGODNO VPLIVALA NA ŽIVINOREJO NA OBČUTLJIVIH OBMOČJIH 41.
Although there are some cases where there seems to be a good justification for the schemes the experience with decoupling shows that in general this move did not imply dramatic changes in the production structure at the EU level as was also noted by the Commission38. 
Čeprav se v nekaterih primerih zdi, da sta shemi povsem upravičeni, izkušnje z nevezanostjo kažejo, da na splošno ta sprememba ni prinesla dramatičnih sprememb v proizvodni strukturi na ravni EU, kar je opazila tudi Komisija38.
The Court’s audit found that in certain regions within Member States, such as mountainous areas or regions where not many viable agricultural alternatives exist, there is a real risk39 of abandonment of livestock farming, which, as shown in Box 6, has materialised in certain Member States. 
Pri reviziji Sodišča je bilo ugotovljeno, da v določenih regijah v državah članicah, na primer na goratih območjih ali v regijah, kjer ni veliko drugih gospodarsko upravičenih možnosti v kmetijstvu, obstaja dejansko tveganje39 za opustitev živinoreje, ki se je, kot je prikazano v okviru 6, v nekaterih državah članicah tudi uresničilo.
In such areas, due to difficult soil or climate conditions and lower profitability, an absence of a specific production requirement causes ruminant livestock production to decrease which, in turn, can have social and economic consequences. 
Na takih območjih s slabo prstjo ali neugodnimi podnebnimi pogoji in nižjo donosnostjo lahko odsotnost posebnih zahtev glede proizvodnje povzroči upad reje prežvekovalcev, kar ima lahko socialne in gospodarske posledice.
39 For a detailed analysis of the environmental risks that can be dealt with through sheep and goat farming, see Commission Evaluation report, (2007) ‘Study on environmental consequences of Sheep and Goat farming and of the Sheep and Goat premium system’, p. 48 to 64. 
39 Za podrobno analizo okoljskih tveganj, ki jih je mogoče reševati v okviru ovčereje in kozjereje, glej ocenjevalno poročilo Komisije (2007): Study on environmental consequences of Sheep and Goat farming and of the Sheep and Goat premium system (Raziskava okoljskih posledic ovčereje in kozjereje ter sistema premij za ovce in koze), str. od 48 do 64.
BOX 6 28 ABANDONMENT OF PRODUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH DECOUPLING IN FRAGILE REGIONS Scotland, which has a large share of low productivity land40 and whose production alternatives are thus limited to ruminant livestock production fed under an extensive grazing system, experienced a strong decline in the number of beneficiaries after the introduction of SPS. 
OKVIR 6 28 OPUSTITEV PROIZVODNJE, POVEZANA Z UVEDBO NEVEZANE POMOČI V OBČUTLJIVIH REGIJAH Na Škotskem, kjer je delež nizko produktivnih površin visok40 in kjer so druge možnosti za proizvodnjo zato omejene na rejo prežvekovalcev, krmljenih v sistemih ekstenzivne paše, je po uvedbi SEP prišlo do velikega zmanjšanja števila upravičencev.
Part of the abandonment was explained by the Scottish authorities as due to older or less efficient farmers getting out of farming who then sublet their land. 
Po navedbah škotskih organov je do dela opustitve prišlo, ker so starejši ali manj učinkoviti kmetje opustili kmetovanje in dali svojo zemljo v podzakup.