natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The ECDC is not prevented by its founding regulation22 from deploying epidemiologists to countries outside the EU. 
Centru ECDC njegova ustanovitvena uredba22 ne preprečuje, da bi napotil epidemiologe v države zunaj EU.
The existing financial and administrative arrangements within the ECDC as well as between the Commission and the ECDC, however, do not lend themselves well to large-scale deployments outside the EU, in particular for through the UCPM. 
Obstoječe finančne in upravne ureditve v okviru ECDC ter med Komisijo in ECDC pa niso najbolj primerne za obsežne napotitve zunaj EU, zlasti prek mehanizma Unije na področju civilne zaščite.
The ECDC is not equipped in terms of core staff and processes to support sustainable deployments and, because its mandate is primarily focused on threats potentially affecting the EU, dedicated budgetary resources have not been made available to support such operations outside the Union. 
ECDC nima dovolj osnovnega osebja in postopkov, da bi lahko podprl trajne napotitve. Ker je njegov mandat osredotočen predvsem na nevarnosti, ki bi lahko prizadele EU, za podporo takih dejavnosti zunaj Unije nima namenskih proračunskih sredstev.
In the absence of a dedicated EU mechanism to deploy epi-demiologists, experts were deployed through the WHO’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network. 
Ker EU ni imela namenskega mehanizma za napotitev epidemiologov, so bili strokovnjaki napoteni v okviru svetovne mreže za opozarjanje in odzivanje na izbruhe, ki deluje pri SZO.
Under the terms of reference of these deployments, however, information restrictions applied and experts could not report directly to the ECDC and to the Commission. 
V okviru mandata teh napotitev pa so veljale omejitve razkrivanja informacij, zato strokovnjaki niso mogli poročati neposredno ECDC in Komisiji.
19 Commission Implementing Decision 2014/762/EU of 16 October 2014 laying down rules for the implementation of Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism and repealing Commission Decisions 2004/277/EC, Euratom and 2007/606/EC, Euratom (OJ L 320, 6.11.2014, p.1). 
1313/2013/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o mehanizmu Unije na področju civilne zaščite ter razveljavitvi odločb Komisije 2004/277/ES, Euratom in 2007/606/ES, Euratom (UL L 320, 6.11.2014, str. 1).
20 Annex II, point 10 of the Implementing Decision. 
20 Točka 10 Priloge II k izvedbenemu sklepu.
21 This component has been operational since the beginning of 2016, and in May 2016 a team including ECDC epidemiologists was mobilised to respond to the yellow fever outbreak in Africa. 
21 Ta element je začel delovati v začetku leta 2016, maja 2016 pa je bila mobilizirana skupina, ki je vključevala epidemiologe Evropskega centra za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni in je bila namenjena odzivu na izbruh rumene mrzlice v Afriki.
22 Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 establishing a European centre for disease prevention and control (OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p. 
851/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o ustanovitvi Evropskega centra za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni (UL L 142, 30.4.2004, str.
Observations 21 EU civil protection teams benefited from substantial support from the EU delegations 34 The EUD in the affected country has an obligation to provide logistical support to the EUCP teams which, in turn, should liaise with the EUD23. In all the crises examined, the EUDs provided — within the capacities available — substantial support in terms of logistics, security briefings, facilitating meetings with local authorities, advice and interpretation with local staff24. 
Opažanja 21 Ekipe EU za civilno zaščito so bile deležne znatne podpore delegacij EU 34 Delegacija EU v prizadeti državi je obvezana, da zagotovi logistično podporo ekipam EUCP, ki se morajo tudi same povezati z delegacijo.23 V vseh krizah, ki jih je preučilo Sodišče, so delegacije EU – kolikor so dopuščale njihove zmogljivosti – zagotavljale znatno podporo, kar zadeva logistiko, informiranje o varnostnih zadevah, olajševanje srečanj z lokalnimi organi, svetovanje in tolmačenje z lokalnim osebjem.24 35 Revizorji so odkrili dokaze o uspešnem sodelovanju med strokovnjaki ekipe EUCP in delegacijami EU.
EUCP teams regularly shared information with the EUD staff. The EUCP teams used the EUDs’ premises as the base for their operations, where they held regular coordination meetings. 
Ekipe EUCP so redno delile informacije z delegacijami, prostore delegacij so uporabljale kot bazo za svoje operacije, kjer so organizirale redne usklajevalne sestanke.
36 In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the national authorities requested the common security and defence policy mission ‘EUFOR Althea’ to provide first response support. 
36 V Bosni in Hercegovini so nacionalni organi za podporo pri prvem odzivu zaprosili misijo skupne varnostne in obrambne politike EUFOR Althea.
The Commission involved EUFOR in the ERCC-organised coordination meetings from the outset, enabling EUFOR to provide information on the action it had undertaken. 
Komisija je od samega začetka vključevala sile EUFOR v usklajevalne sestanke v organizaciji centra ERCC ter jim tako omogočila, da zagotovijo informacije o ukrepih, ki so jih izvedle.
Coordination on the ground between the EUCP team and EUFOR was primarily facilitated by the EUD/EU Special Representative’s office, which also coordinated the activities of the various EU actors and the Member States’ missions. 
Lažje usklajevanje na terenu med ekipo EUCP in silami EUFOR sta omogočala predvsem delegacija EU/urad posebnega predstavnika EU, ki sta usklajevala tudi dejavnosti različnih akterjev EU in misij držav članic.
In this context, the EUCP team received direct assistance from EUFOR through the provision of a helicopter, which was then used to conduct an aerial assessment of the situation and a field visit. 
Tako je EUFOR ekipi EUCP zagotovil neposredno pomoč tako, da ji je dal na razpolago helikopter, ki je bil nato uporabljen za izvedbo ocene stanja iz zraka in obisk na terenu.
37 Levels of awareness of what capacities the UCPM could offer or how affected countries should request its assistance varied across the EUDs in the affected countries. 
37 Raven ozaveščenosti o tem, katere zmogljivosti lahko ponudi mehanizem UCPM ali kako lahko prizadete države zaprosijo pomoč v njegovem okviru, se je pri delegacijah EU v prizadetih državah razlikovala.
There are no dedicated ‘civil protection focal points’ in the EUDs. 
V delegacijah EU ni namenskih kontaktnih točk za civilno zaščito.
While the EUD to Bosnia and Herzegovina had previous experience in triggering the mechanism, the EUDs in the countries affected by the Ebola outbreak had limited awareness of the possibilities offered by the UCPM at the outset of the crisis, despite the note sent by ECHO in 201225. At a Health Security Committee meeting in August 2014, ECHO informed Member States that it had taken the initiative of contacting the affected countries; nevertheless, we were unable to obtain direct evidence of proactive steps taken by the Commission, either directly or through the EEAS, to encourage the affected countries to request activation. 
Medtem ko je delegacija EU v Bosni in Hercegovini imela pretekle izkušnje z aktivacijo mehanizma, pa so delegacije EU v državah, ki jih je prizadel izbruh ebole, ob začetku krize slabo poznale možnosti, ki jih ponuja mehanizem Unije na področju civilne zaščite, čeprav jim je GD ECHO v letu 2012 poslal obvestilo v zvezi s tem.25 Na sestanku Odbora za zdravstveno varnost avgusta 2014 je GD ECHO obvestil države članice, da je na lastno pobudo vzpostavil stik s prizadetimi državami, vendar Sodišče ni moglo pridobiti neposrednih dokazov o morebitnih proaktivnih ukrepih Komisije, bodisi neposrednih bodisi prek Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje, s katerimi bi spodbujala prizadete države, da zaprosijo za aktivacijo mehanizma.
23 Article 16(5) of the Decision. 
23 Člen 16(5) Sklepa.
24 In Nepal, the head of the EU delegation signalled the inadequate level of preparedness of the EUD itself in the event of a worst-case scenario 2 months prior to the earthquake striking. 
24 V Nepalu je vodja delegacije EU opozorila na nezadostno raven pripravljenosti same delegacije za primer najslabšega možnega scenarija dva meseca pred potresom.
While the scale of the disaster was very significant, it was less severe than foreseen in this worst-case scenario, and therefore the EUD was able to provide the necessary support to the EUCP team. 
Čeprav je bil obseg nesreče znaten, ta ni bila tako resna, kot je bilo predvideno v najslabšem možnem scenariju, zato je delegacija zmogla zagotoviti potrebno podporo ekipi EUCP.
25 The Commission sent notes to the heads of EU delegations in 2012 and at the end of 2014 explaining the workings of the UCPM and how affected countries could request assistance. 
25 Komisija je vodjem delegacij EU leta 2012 in konec leta 2014 poslala obvestila, v katerih je pojasnila delovanje mehanizma Unije na področju civilne zaščite in to, kako lahko prizadete države zaprosijo za pomoč.
Observations 22 The Commission made use of the existing ECHO Field Network, but greater civil protection synergies could be sought 38 Following an activation, the Commission should seek synergies between the UCPM and other EU instruments, in particular with EU humanitarian aid26. The implementing rules of the Commission’s Decision do not explicitly address synergies and the Commission has not identified the practical steps involved in achieving them. 
Opažanja 22 Komisija je uporabljala obstoječe terenske mreže GD ECHO, vendar bi bilo na področju civilne zaščite mogoče najti večje sinergije 38 Po aktivaciji mehanizma mora Komisija poiskati sinergije med mehanizmom UPCM in drugimi instrumenti EU, predvsem humanitarno pomočjo EU.26 Izvedbena pravila Sklepa Komisije sinergij izrecno ne obravnavajo, Komisija pa ni opredelila praktičnih ukrepov za njihovo uresničitev.
When analysing the three disasters, we identified efforts to coordinate and link with other instruments, especially with humanitarian and development aid, although this was mainly done on an ad hoc basis. 
Pri analizi zadevnih treh nesreč je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so obstajala prizadevanja za uskladitev in povezavo z drugimi instrumenti, zlasti s humanitarno in razvojno pomočjo, čeprav so se ta v glavnem izvajala po potrebi.
39 In all three cases examined, ECHO Field Network experts were deployed on the ground at the same time as the EUCP teams and modules, providing information to the ERCC and attending coordination meetings. 
39 V vseh treh preučenih primerih so bili hkrati kot ekipe in moduli EUCP na teren napoteni strokovnjaki terenske mreže GD ECHO, ki so zagotavljali informacije centru ERCC in se udeleževali usklajevalnih sestankov.
In this way, the Commission made good use of the existing network in its overall response. 
Tako je Komisija pri svojem splošnem odzivu dobro izkoristila obstoječo mrežo.
40 Nevertheless, potential synergies have not been fully exploited between the civil protection and humanitarian assistance areas. 
40 Kljub temu pa morebitne sinergije med področjema civilne zaščite in humanitarne pomoči niso bile v celoti izkoriščene.
The ECHO Field Network’s staff are experts in the UN humanitarian aid system but are typically not trained in matters of civil protection. 
Osebje terenske mreže GD ECHO so strokovnjaki na področja sistema ZN za humanitarno pomoč, vendar običajno niso usposobljeni na področju civilne zaščite.
In its lessons-learned report on Nepal, the Commission acknowledged that ‘Civil protection could make more/quicker use of the humanitarian aid partner network for assessments’. 
V svojem poročilu o pridobljenih izkušnjah v Nepalu je Komisija navedla, da bi civilna zaščita za ocenjevanje lahko večkrat in hitreje uporabila mrežo partnerjev s področja humanitarne pomoči.
The Commission respected UN OCHA’s leading role and adopted flexible coordination structures in coherence with the overall UN set-up 41 According to the legal framework, the Commission’s coordination activities should be fully integrated into UN OCHA’s overall coordination efforts and respect UN OCHA’s leading role27. Although ‘full integration’ is not further defined, the draft operational guidelines for field cooperation between EUCP and UNDAC teams cite three areas where ‘full integration is possible and desirable’: assessment, coordination and information management28. 26 Article 16(11) of the Decision. 
Komisija je spoštovala vodilno vlogo ZN OCHA in je vzpostavila prožne strukture usklajevanja v skladu s splošno zasnovo ZN 41 V skladu s pravnim okvirom morajo biti dejavnosti Komisije v zvezi z usklajevanjem popolnoma vključene v splošna prizadevanja za usklajevanje, za katera skrbi Urad ZN za usklajevanje humanitarnih aktivnosti (OCHA), pri tem pa mora Komisija spoštovati njegovo vodilno vlogo.27 Čeprav ni dodatno opredeljeno, kaj pomeni popolna vključenost, pa so v osnutku operativnih smernic za sodelovanje na terenu med ekipami EUCP in UNDAC navedena tri področja, na katerih je popolna vključenost možna in zaželena: ocenjevanja, usklajevanje in upravljanje informacij.28 26 Člen 16(11) Sklepa.
27 Article 16(2) of the Decision. 
27 Člen 16(2) Sklepa.
The obligation with regard to integrating the coordination only applies to UN OCHA, not to other UN organisations. 
Obveznost glede vključenosti usklajevanja se nanaša zgolj nauradZNOCHAinnena druge organizacije ZN.
28 Draft operational guidelines for field cooperation between EU civil protection and UNDAC teams: Civil Protection Committee, information exchange on ongoing activities, 21-22 October 2009. 
28 Osnutek smernic za sodelovanje na terenu med ekipami EUCP in ekipami UNDAC: Odbor za civilno zaščito, izmenjava informacij o tekočih dejavnostih, 21.-22. oktobra 2009.
Observations 23 42 In practice, the degree of integration in the UN system falls across a broad spectrum. 
Opažanja 23 42 V praksi je stopnja vključenosti v sistem ZN zelo širok pojem.
There might be joint EU/UNDAC assessment missions, EUCP teams integrated into the UNDAC-established On-site Operations Coordination Centre (OSOCC), parallel EU and UNDAC teams or no UNDAC team at all. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach. 
Možne so skupne ocenjevalne misije EU/UNDAC, ekipe EUCP, vključene v center UNDAC za usklajevanje operacij na kraju nesreče (OSOCC), vzporedne ekipe EU in UNDAC, včasih pa ekipe UNDAC sploh ne obstajajo – univerzalnega pristopa ni.
How well EUCP teams will fit into the overall coordination structure is very context specific: the greater the EU contribution to rescue operations, the greater the need for a strong EU coordination role. 
Kako dobro bodo ekipe EUCP vključene v splošno strukturo za usklajevanje je odvisno od vsakokratnih okoliščin: večji kot je prispevek EU k reševalni akciji, večja je potreba po močni vlogi EU pri usklajevanju.
43 This is illustrated by the very different coordination structures with the UN in place for the three examined disasters. 
43 To je razvidno iz zelo različnih struktur za usklajevanje z ZN, ki so bile vzpostavljene v primerih treh preučenih nesreč.
In Bosnia and Herzegovina, due to the absence of a UNDAC team, the UN resident coordinator and the EU head of delegation/EUSR agreed informally to assign to the EUCP team the responsibility for coordinating incoming civil protection assistance. 
V Bosni in Hercegovini sta se – zaradi odsotnosti ekipe UNDAC – lokalni koordinator ZN in vodja delegacije EU/posebni predstavnik EU neuradno dogovorila, da odgovornost za usklajevanje prihajajoče pomoči na področju civilne zaščite dodelita ekipi EUCP.
At the same time, the EU respected the UN’s lead on humanitarian aid coordination through the ‘cluster system’29 established by the UN Development Programme in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 
Obenem je EU spoštovala vodilno vlogo ZN pri usklajevanju humanitarne pomoči na podlagi sistema usklajevanja po sklopih29, ki ga je vzpostavil Program ZN za razvoj v Bosni in Hercego-vini.
In Nepal, the EUCP teams were integrated into the UN OSOCC structure and the cluster system. 
V Nepalu so bile ekipe EUCP vključene v strukturo ZN OSOCC in sistem usklajevanja po sklopih.
During the Ebola outbreak, EU experts were deployed to the UNDAC teams as associated members. 
Med izbruhom ebole so bili strokovnjaki EU napoteni v ekipe UNDAC kot pridruženi člani.
While these cases differed, the Court found that, in all three cases, the Commission respected the UN’s lead. 
Čeprav so se opisani primeri razlikovali, je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je Komisija v vseh treh primerih spoštovala vodilno vlogo ZN.
44 The integration of EUCP experts into the UN OSOCC structure in Nepal made it difficult for us to clearly and separately identify the EU contribution to the overall coordination efforts and its added value. 
44 Zaradi vključenosti strokovnjakov EUCP v strukturo ZN OSOCC v Nepalu je imelo Sodišče težave jasno in ločeno opredeliti prispevek EU k splošnim prizadevanjem za usklajevanje in njegovo dodano vrednost.
Although the EUCP team’s activity reports highlighted regular contact with the modules deployed via the UCPM and provided first-hand information for the ERCC and the Participating States, the modules were mainly coordinated through the UN system (e.g. the allocation of areas of operation or concrete tasks). 
Čeprav so poročila o dejavnostih ekipe EUCP poudarjala redne stike z moduli, napotenimi v okviru UPCM, in zagotavljala neposredne informacije za center ERCC in sodelujoče države, je usklajevanje modulov večinoma potekalo v okviru sistema ZN (npr. dodelitev območij za operacije ali konkretnih nalog).
45 While liaison officers and EUCP experts from regional mechanisms like the UCPM can be deployed to UN OSOCCs, their integration ‘does not provide a sufficient basis for regional organisations to facilitate operational coordination for their members’30. Therefore, the Commission has been tasked by the UN in 2016 with defining more precisely a specific role for regional coordination mechanisms within the OSOCCs’ operations. 
45 Uradniki za zvezo in strokovnjaki EUCP iz regionalnih mehanizmov, kot je mehanizem UPCM, so lahko napoteni v centre ZN OSOCC, vendar njihovo vključevanje ni dovolj, da bi regionalne organizacije lahko olajševale operativno usklajevanje za svoje člane.30 Zato so ZN leta 2016 Komisiji zaupali nalogo natančnejše opredelitve specifičnih vlog regionalnih mehanizmov za usklajevanje pri operacijah OSOCC.
This is intended to improve operational coordination among their own members, allowing for more common situational analyses and needs assessments31. 29 Clusters are groups of humanitarian organisations, both UN and non-UN, in each of the main sectors of humanitarian action, e.g. water or health. 
To naj bi izboljšalo operativno usklajevanje med njihovimi lastnimi člani in omogočalo bolj usklajeno analizo položaja in ocene potreb.31 29 Sklopi so skupine humanitarnih organizacij, tako v okviru ZN kot zunaj ZN, iz vsakega od glavnih sektorjev humanitarne pomoči, npr. vodni viri, zdravje.
They are created when clear humanitarian needs exist within a sector, when there are numerous actors within sectors and when national authorities need coordination support. 
Oblikujejo se, kadar v nekem sektorju obstaja jasna humanitarna potreba, kadar v sektorju delujejo številni akterji in kadar nacionalni organi potrebujejo pomoč pri usklajevanju.
30 ECHO, 2016, ‘A new role for regional coordination mechanisms in the framework of the OSOCC’, discussion paper for the Humanitarian Networks and Partnership Week, Geneva 2-5 February. 31 Ibid. 
30 GD ECHO, 2016, A new role for regional coordination mechanisms in the framework of the OSOCC (Nova vlogo regionalnih mehanizmov za usklajevanje v okviru OSOCC), dokument za razpravo na srečanju Humanitarian Networks and Partnership Week, Ženeva, 2.–5. februarja. 31 Prav tam.
Observations 24 46 Cooperation is largely based on a high level of trust, and so personal relationships play an important role. 
Opažanja 24 46 Sodelovanje večinoma temelji na visoki stopnji zaupanja, zato osebni odnosi igrajo pomembno vlogo.
The Commission has acknowledged, however, the need to formalise its relationships with UN OCHA and other UN agencies to strengthen cooperation and coordination in disaster preparedness and response. 
Komisija pa priznava, da je treba formalizirati njene odnose z ZN OCHA in drugimi agencijami ZN, da bi se okrepili sodelovanje in usklajevanje pri pripravljenosti na nesreče in odzivanju nanje.
Since 2015 it has signed formal cooperation agreements with UN OCHA and the WFP, and further agreements with the WHO and the IOM are planned. 
Od leta 2015 je sklenila formalna sporazuma o sodelovanju z ZN OCHA in Svetovnim programom za hrano, sporazumi s SZO in Mednarodno organizacijo za migracije pa so v načrtu.
The Commission took steps towards ensuring a smooth transition into the recovery phase 47 Towards the end of a disaster, in the closing phase of the civil protection response, the Commission has an obligation to facilitate a smooth handover among all relevant actors32. To this end, handover meetings took place for all three disasters, aimed at ensuring a smooth transition to humanitarian aid/further investment (see Box 2). 
Komisija je izvedla ukrepe za zagotovitev nemotenega prehoda v fazo okrevanja 47 Proti koncu nesreče, v zaključni fazi odziva civilne zaščite, je dolžnost Komisije, da omogoči nemoten primopredaja med vsemi zadevnimi akterji.32 Zato so bili pri vseh treh nesrečah organizirani sestanki za primopredajo, katerih cilj je bil zagotoviti nemoten prehod v fazo humanitarne pomoči/nadaljnjih naložb (glej okvir 2).
48 For all three disasters, post-disaster needs assessments were carried out jointly by the UN, the World Bank and the European Commission. 
48 Pri vseh treh nesrečah so ZN, Mednarodna banka za obnovo in razvoj ter Evropska komisija skupaj opravile ocene potreb po nesreči.
Following the floods in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the ERCC actively participated in the selection of experts for the recovery needs assessment and carried out a related preparatory mission. 
Po poplavah v Bosni in Hercegovini je ERCC dejavno sodeloval pri izboru strokovnjakov za oceno potreb pri okrevanju in opravil s tem povezane pripravljalne misije.
ECHO also collaborated closely with DG NEAR ahead of the July 2014 international donor conference of the country’. 
GD ECHO je prav tako tesno sodeloval z GD NEAR pri pripravah na mednarodno konferenco donatorjev za državo, ki je potekala julija 2014.
32 Article 16(3)(e) of the Decision. 
32 Člen 16(3)(e) Sklepa.
Coordinating the transition into the recovery phase in Bosnia and Herzegovina The case of the Austrian water purification module in the Posavina canton in Bosnia and Herzegovina can serve as an illustration of a thorough handover. 
Usklajevanje prehoda v fazo okrevanja v Bosni in Hercegovini Avstrijski modul za prečiščevanje vode v kantonu Posavina v Bosni in Hercegovini lahko služi kot primer temeljito izvedene primopredaje.
As assistance was being phased out, the EUCP team collaborated with the local working group — in which local governments, water suppliers, international teams and several NGOs were represented — to agree on a strategy to provide drinking water until enough wells had been tested and, if necessary, cleaned. 
Ko je bila pomoč v fazi postopnega zaključevanja, je ekipa EUCP sodelovala z lokalno delovno skupino, – v kateri so bili predstavniki lokalnih upravnih organov, podjetij za vodno oskrbo, mednarodnih ekip in več nevladnih organizacij –, da bi se dogovorili o strategiji oskrbe s pitno vodo, dokler ne bi bilo preizkušenih in po potrebi očiščenih dovolj vodnjakov.
This resulted in the need for the Austrian team to stay for 2 months. 
Zato je morala avstrijska ekipa ostati še dva meseca.
Their large capacity made a phased withdrawal of the other teams possible and also ensured that the working group was connected to the national Unicef-led WASH33 cluster. 
Ker so bile njene zmogljivosti velike, so se druge ekipe lahko postopoma umaknile, zagotovila pa je tudi, da je bila delovna skupina v stiku s predstavniki nacionalnega sklopa WASH33, ki ga je vodil UNICEF.
33 Water, sanitation and hygiene. 
33 Voda, komunala in higiena.