natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The evaluation of CAP measures for the sheep and goat sector16 recommends specific production-linked support for sheep and goat production in order to maintain farming in specific vulnerable regions. 15 See http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/directaidbeef/exec_ sum_en.pdf 16 Seehttp://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/sheep-goat/executive_ summary_en.pdf REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Furthermore, for the four Member States mentioned by the Court, the sheep and goat premiums were integrated into the SPS because they considered that the level (50 %) of coupled payment allowed was not sufficient to justify keeping two management and control systems in parallel. 
Na podlagi ocene ukrepov SKP za sektor ovc in koz16 se priporoča posebna, z vzrejo povezana podpora za vzrejo ovc in koz, da bi se ohranilo kmetijstvo v posebnih občutljivih regijah. 15 Glej http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/directaidbeef/ exec_sum_en.pdf. 16 Glej http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/sheep-goat/ executive_summary_en.pdf.
Box 4 See reply to paragraph 28. 
Okvir 4 Glej odgovor na odstavek 28.
The Commission considers that the objectives of the audited schemes have been achieved. 
Komisija meni, da so bili cilji revidiranih shem doseženi.
In relation to the example given, the fact that the herd remained almost constant is in line with the objective to maintain the production in this area. 
V zvezi z navedenim primerom je dejstvo, da je čreda ostala skoraj nespremenjena, v skladu s ciljem ohranjanja proizvodnje na tem območju.
However, some analyses17 have shown that those premiums have contributed to maintaining animal production in some fragile regions and have mitigated the effects of those external factors. 
Vendar so nekatere analize17 pokazale, da so navedene premije prispevale k ohranjanju vzreje živali v nekaterih občutljivih regijah in ublažile učinke navedenih zunanjih dejavnikov.
Although the dynamics of the beef sector are affected by external factors, in the case of suckler cows the coupled premium appears to have supported the sector18. 
Čeprav zunanji dejavniki vplivajo na dinamiko sektorja govejega mesa, se zdi, da je v primeru krav dojilj vezana premija podprla sektor18.
Concerning the goat sector, the maintaining of coupled support has slowed down the decline in the sector, influenced by the fall in consumption and the drop in market prices. 
Kar zadeva sektor koz, je ohranjanje vezane podpore upočasnilo upadanje v sektorju, ki sta ga povzročila zmanjšanje porabe in znižanje tržnih cen.
The objective of partial decoupling is not to formulate an exact level of production to be achieved, but rather to maintain a minimum level of agricultural production to sustain the economic activity in regions with few economic alternatives. 
Cilj delno nevezane pomoči ni določiti natančne stopnje proizvodnje, ki jo je treba doseči, ampak ohranjati minimalno stopnjo kmetijske proizvodnje, da se obdrži gospodarska dejavnost v regijah, v katerih ni veliko drugih gospodarskih možnosti.
17 See report on the evaluation of market effects of partial decoupling - October 2010. 
17 Glej poročilo o oceni tržnih učinkov delno nevezane pomoči iz oktobra 2010.
The Commission confirms that overall the orientation toward decoupling has not suffered from the maintenance of some coupled aids: the decoupled part of direct aids represented 85.3 % of the total direct aids in calendar year 2009, compared to an expected rate of decoupling at around 93.6 % in calendar year 2013. 
Komisija potrjuje, da ohranjanje nekaterih vrst vezane pomoči ni ogrozilo splošne usmerjenosti k nevezani pomoči: nevezani del neposredne pomoči je v koledarskem letu 2009 predstavljal 85,3 % skupne neposredne pomoči, pričakovani delež nevezane pomoči za koledarsko leto 2013 pa je približno 93,6 %.
The Commission also wishes to underline that the improvement of the competitiveness of those farmers receiving the audited coupled aids was not a primary objective of the audited schemes and is better ensured by other CAP instruments (e.g. rural development investment measures). 
Komisija želi tudi izpostaviti, da izboljšanje konkurenčnosti kmetov, ki prejemajo revidirano vezano pomoč, ni bil glavni cilj revidiranih shem in da ta cilj bolje zagotavljajo drugi instrumenti SKP (npr. naložbeni ukrepi za razvoj podeželja).
Coupled aids aim at keeping a minimum production activity in regions where decoupling could lead to abandonment of production and to its consequences for employment and the environment (minimum agricultural activity is in sensitive areas essential for, for example, biodiversity and landscape). 
Cilj vezane pomoči je ohranjanje minimalne proizvodne dejavnosti v regijah, v katerih bi lahko nevezana pomoč povzročila opustitev proizvodnje ter tako vplivala na zaposlitev in okolje (minimalna kmetijska dejavnost je na občutljivih območjih bistvena za npr. biotsko raznovrstnost in krajino).
See also joint reply to paragraphs 29 and 30. 
Glej tudi skupni odgovor na odstavka 29 in 30.
The concentration trend noted by the Court is the effect of the long-term structural adjustment of the agricultural sector. 
Trend koncentracije, ki ga ugotavlja Sodišče, je učinek dolgoročnega strukturnega prilagajanja kmetijskega sektorja.
Based on Eurostat data, the concentration trend in terms of number of suckler cows, sheep and goats per producer can be confirmed for most Member States and for the EU-27 as a whole. 
Glede na podatke Eurostata se lahko trend koncentracije v smislu števila krav dojilj, ovc in koz na proizvajalca potrdi za večino držav članic in za EU-27 kot celoto.
The social impacts of partial implementation of the SPS, e.g. on employment or the vitality of rural areas, will only become apparent in the longer term. 
Socialni učinki delnega izvajanja SEP, npr. na zaposlitev ali sposobnost preživetja podeželskih območij, bodo postali vidni šele v dolgoročnem obdobju.
However, whether or not this decrease is linked to the choice of support system (coupled versus decoupled) is difficult to assess. 
Vendar je težko oceniti, ali je to zmanjšanje povezano z izbiro sistema podpore (vezana v primerjavi z nevezano).
The impact assessments of both the ‘Health check’ and the CAP towards 2020 reforms have shown that the decrease in the number of livestock farms will be high albeit to different extents depending on the Member State in case of full decoupling. 
Ocene učinka sistematskega pregleda in reforme SKP proti letu 2020 so pokazale, da bo zmanjšanje števila živinorejskih kmetij v primeru v celoti nevezane pomoči veliko, čeprav se bo med državami članicami razlikovalo.
Because CAP objectives are multiple and CAP tools and their combination contribute to those objectives in different ways, it is indeed sometimes difficult to distinguish at first glance the effect of one tool from another tool on one objective. 
Ker ima SKP več ciljev ter orodja SKP in njihove kombinacije na različne načine prispevajo k uresničevanju teh ciljev, je včasih dejansko težko na prvi pogled razlikovati med učinki različnih orodij na isti cilj.
This is the role of analysis and evaluation of CAP instruments done by the Commission. 
To je vloga analize in ocene instrumentov SKP, ki ju opravlja Komisija.
For instance, the synthesis of the evaluations analysing environmental impacts of CAP measures applied in different sectors19 shows that some coupled measures clearly have a positive environmental effect, in particular the suckler cow premium which, among other positive impacts, helped to maintain extensive farming. 
Zbirno poročilo o ocenah, s katerimi so bili analizirani učinki ukrepov SKP, uporabljeni v različnih sektorjih, na okolje19, je na primer pokazalo, da imajo nekateri vezani ukrepi jasen pozitiven učinek na okolje, zlasti premija za krave dojilje, ki je med drugimi pozitivnimi učinki pripomogla k ohranjanju ekstenzivnega kmetijstva.
All in all, those different CAP tools referred to in the Court’s observation are not necessarily used in the same regions and Member States have flexibility to decide which tools are the most appropriate to fulfil the assigned objectives. 
Na splošno se različna orodja SKP, navedena v opažanjih Sodišča, ne uporabljajo nujno v istih regijah, pri čemer se lahko države članice same odločijo, katera orodja so najprimernejša za uresničitev zastavljenih ciljev.
19 See http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/environment-summary/index_fr.htm Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
19 Glejhttp://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/environment-summary/ index_fr.htm. Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 17. 32.
Several analyses and evaluations demonstrate the relevance of these schemes. (See paragraph V.) 
Več analiz in ocen dokazuje pomembnost teh shem (glej odstavek V).
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 45. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 45.
Please see reply to paragraph VII(b). 
Glej odgovor na odstavek VII(b).
Box 7 Please see reply to paragraph VII(b). 
Okvir 7 Glej odgovor na odstavek VII(b).
The Commission proposal for the CAP towards 2020 foresees the establishment of a common monitoring and evaluation framework with a view to measuring the performance of the common agricultural policy, including first and second pillar measures. 
Predlog Komisije za SKP proti letu 2020 določa vzpostavitev skupnega okvira za spremljanje in ocenjevanje, da bi se meril uspeh skupne kmetijske politike, vključno z ukrepi prvega in drugega stebra.
The Commission considers that the risk of double funding is mitigated as Member States shall ensure that a farmer may receive support for a given operation under only one support measure (Article 38(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009). 
Komisija meni, da je tveganje dvojnega financiranja zmanjšano, ker države članice zagotavljajo, da lahko kmet prejme podporo za zadevno dejavnost le v okviru enega podpornega ukrepa (člen 38(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1120/2009).
Consequently, the Member State’s notification on specific support shall include in particular a description of any existing measures applied under Community support schemes or under measures financed by state aids in the same area or sector as the specific support measure and, where appropriate, the demarcation between them (Part A(c) of Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009). 
Zato obvestilo držav članic o posebni podpori vključuje zlasti opis vseh obstoječih ukrepov, ki se izvajajo na podlagi shem podpore Skupnosti ali drugih ukrepov, financiranih z državnimi pomočmi, na istem območju ali v istem sektorju kot posebni podporni ukrep, ter po potrebi razmejitev med temi ukrepi (del A(c) Priloge IV k Uredbi (ES) št.
This information is scrutinised by the Commission at the time of the assessment of the notification, irrespective of a possible approval of the notified measures. 
Te informacije Komisija podrobno pregleda v času ocene obvestila, ne glede na morebitno odobritev priglašenih ukrepov.
However, this procedure to avoid double funding for a single operation does not prevent the use of different tools (i.e. support schemes) in order to achieve a similar objective. 
Vendar ta postopek za preprečevanje dvojnega financiranja iste dejavnosti ne preprečuje uporabe različnih orodij (tj. podpornih shem) za uresničitev podobnega cilja.
Box 9 See reply to paragraph 39. 
Box 9 Glej odgovor na odstavek 39.
Member States have a certain flexibility among voluntary schemes to decide which scheme or combination of schemes will fit best with the challenges of specific sectors or regions. 
Države članice lahko do neke mere svobodno izbirajo med prostovoljnimi shemami in se odločijo, katera shema ali kombinacija shem bo najbolj ustrezala izzivom posebnih sektorjev ali regij.
Having different instruments which in combination contribute to achieving the multiple objectives of the CAP is considered as positive by the Commission and helps in obtaining better value for money. 
Uporabo kombinacije različnih instrumentov, ki prispeva k uresničevanju več ciljev SKP, Komisija obravnava kot pozitivno, pri čemer taka kombinacija pomaga tudi pri doseganju boljše vrednosti za denar.
Box 6 The decision to continue implementing coupled support for ruminants in the framework of the partial implementation of the SPS is a Member State decision. 
Okvir 6 Odločitev o nadaljnjem izvajanju vezane podpore za pre-žvekovalce v okviru delnega izvajanja SEP je odločitev države članice.
The decision of the UK — Scotland to continue granting a coupled support in the beef sector first, under Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, then under Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 is partially related to the context referred to in the Court’s observation. 
Odločitev Združenega kraljestva/Škotske o nadaljnjem dodeljevanju vezane podpore v sektorju govejega mesa, in sicer najprej v skladu s členom 69 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003, nato pa v skladu s členom 68 Uredbe (ES) št.
See reply to paragraph VII (d). 
Glej odgovor na odstavek VII (d).
43 and 44. Joint reply The assessment of the impacts of CAP support schemes in general and the schemes for beef and sheep and goat sectors in particular is done on a regular basis by the Commission. 
43 in 44. – skupni odgovor Komisija redno ocenjuje splošne učinke shem podpore SKP ter zlasti učinke shem za sektorja govejega mesa ter ovc in koz (glej odgovor na odstavek V v zvezi z navedenimi analizami in ocenami).
In terms of income and employment (social impact), the abovementioned evaluations and analyses give a good indication of the fact that the income of those livestock sectors depends strongly on the coupled aids and that environmentally, the decoupling of coupled aid would certainly lead to abandonment of breeding activities, which in sensitive regions will result in loss of employment and even to abandonment of agricultural production. 
Z vidika dohodka in zaposlitve (socialni učinek) zgoraj navedene ocene in analize jasno dokazujejo, da je dohodek zadevnih živinorejskih sektorjev v veliki meri odvisen od vezane pomoči in da bi z okoljskega vidika nevezana pomoč gotovo povzročila opustitev dejavnosti vzreje, zaradi česar bi v občutljivih regijah prišlo do izgub zaposlitve in celo do opustitve kmetijske proizvodnje.
In addition, the monitoring of the schemes is ensured by relevant provisions in the applicable legislation aiming for example at ensuring compliance with the budgetary ceilings fixed by the Commission for the audited schemes20, at following the implementation of the schemes by the Member States21 and at monitoring the controls carried out by the Member States under the IACS rules22. 
Poleg tega spremljanje shem zagotavljajo zadevne določbe veljavne zakonodaje, katerih cilji so npr. zagotavljanje skladnosti s proračunskimi zgornjimi mejami, ki jih je Komisija določila za revidirani shemi20, spremljanje izvajanja shem s strani držav članic21 ali spremljanje kontrol, ki jih države članice izvajajo na podlagi pravil IAKS22.
20 Article 64(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
20 Člen 64(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
21 See communications under Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004. 
21 Glej sporočila iz člena 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004.
22 Notifications referred to in Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. 
22 Obveščanje iz člena 76 Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004.
The evaluation of the meat sector requires time for the impact of the policy to become visible, as there is a time lag (typically several years) between the production decisions of farmers and their impact. 
V analizi se z namenom ocene učinkov zlasti primerja marža glede na stroške poslovanja z vezanimi plačili in brez njih, pri čemer se osredotoča na določene države članice, vrste sistemov reje in vrste območij (območja z omejenimi možnostmi, gorska območja z omejenimi možnostmi, območja, ki nimajo omejenih možnosti), Za oceno sektorja mesa je potreben čas, da postane učinek politike viden, ker med proizvodnimi odločitvami kmetov in njihovim učinkom preteče nekaj časa (navadno več let).
The example referred to by the Court provides a good illustration: the implementation in the Member States of Article 68 measures23 started only in 2010. 
Primer, ki ga je navedlo Sodišče, to dobro ponazarja: izvajanje ukrepov iz člena 6823 se je v državah članicah začelo — šele leta 2010.
Consequently, an evaluation at this stage would have been premature. 
Zato bi bila ocena v tej fazi prezgodnja.
To address this inherent limitation, the evaluation of market effects of partial decoupling24 (concluded in 2010) included a simulation of a situation with full decoupling of direct aid in both the beef and veal and sheep and goat sectors, giving an indication of the possible effects of full decoupling applied to those sectors. 
Zaradi obravnavanja te inherentne omejitve je ocena tržnih učinkov delno nevezane pomoči24 (zaključena leta 2010) vključevala simulacijo razmer v primeru v celoti nevezane neposredne pomoči v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa ter v sektorju ovc in koz, pri čemer so bili izraženi možni učinki v celoti nevezane pomoči v navedenih sektorjih.
In addition, the impact assessment for the CAP towards 2020 includes specific analysis supported by the latest available data on the suppression of coupled support for beef, sheep and goat sectors25. 
Poleg tega ocena učinka za SKP proti letu 2020 vključuje posebno analizo, podprto z najnovejšimi razpoložljivimi podatki o odpravljanju vezane podpore v sektorjih govejega mesa, ovc in koz25.
When it comes to the decision-making process for the upcoming reform, the Commission bases its proposals on an impact assessment which draws on a whole range of information sources, quantitative analyses, qualitative and quantitative information from the literature and public consultations26. 
V postopku odločanja v zvezi s prihodnjo reformo se Komi-— sija pri svojih predlogih opira na oceno učinka, ki temelji na številnih različnih virih informacij, kvantitativnih analizah, kvalitativnih in kvantitativnih informacijah iz literature ter javnih posvetovanjih26.
23 Article 68 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (which replaced Article 69 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003). 
23 Člen 68 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 (ki je nadomestil člen 69 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
24 Report on the evaluation of market effects of partial decoupling — October 2010. 
24 Poročilo o oceni tržnih učinkov delne nevezanosti pomoči iz oktobra 2010.
25 See Sub-annex 3E of the impact assessment report (SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 of 20 October 2011). 
26 Glejtočko1.3oceneučinkaskupnekmetijskepolitikeprotiletu2020, SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 z dne 20. oktobra 2011.
In particular: — recent impact assessments27 indicate the economic need to maintain coupled support in certain sectors and for certain regions of Europe; in particular, the analyses compare the margin over operating costs with and without coupled payments and look at the particular Member States, types of production systems and types of areas (LFA, mountain LFA, non-LFA) to assess the impacts. — synthesis of the evaluations analysing environmental impacts of CAP measures applied in different sectors28 indicates a positive environmental effect of some of the coupled measures, in particular the suckler cow premium which, among other positive impacts, helped to maintain extensive farming and to avoid intensification in some regions. — the evaluation of direct aids in the beef and veal sector29 recommended maintaining some type of coupled aid in sensitive regions, in particular for suckler cows as it helps maintain the suckler cow’s herd and could slow down employment decline in the breeding activity in sensitive regions. — similarly, the evaluation of CAP measures for the sheep and goat sector30 recommends specific production linked support to the sheep and goat production in order to maintain farming in specific vulnerable regions. 
Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP — zbirno poročilo o ocenah, s katerimi so bili analizirani učinki ukrepov SKP, uporabljenih v različnih sektorjih, na okolje28, je pokazalo pozitiven učinek nekaterih vezanih ukrepov na okolje, zlasti premije za krave dojilje, ki je med drugimi pozitivnimi učinki pripomogla k ohranjanju ekstenzivnega kmetijstva in preprečevanju intenzifikacije v nekaterih regijah, glede na oceno neposredne pomoči v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa29 je priporočljivo, da se v občutljivih regijah ohranijo nekatere vrste vezane pomoči, zlasti za krave dojilje, saj prispevajo k ohranjanju črede krav dojilj in lahko v občutljivih regijah upočasnijo upadanje zaposlenosti na področju reje, — podobno se na podlagi ocene ukrepov SKP za sektor ovc in koz30 priporoča posebna, z vzrejo povezana podpora za vzrejo ovc in koz, da bi se ohranilo kmetijstvo v posebnih občutljivih regijah.
27 See Note 3 of Annex C of the health check impact assessment and Annex 3E of the CAP post 2013 impact assessment (SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 of 20 October 2011). 
27 Glejopombo3PrilogeCkoceniučinkasistematskegapregledaSKPin Prilogo 3E k oceni učinka SKP po letu 2013 (SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 z dne 20. oktobra 2011).
The decision to partially implement the single payment scheme31 was left to the Member States in order to allow them to facilitate the transition between the payment regimes in force in the previous period and the new single payment scheme in sectors where such a transition could affect certain types of farming. 
Odločitev glede delnega izvajanja sheme enotnega pla-čila31 je bila prepuščena državam članicam, da bi se jim omogočilo olajšanje prehoda med plačilnimi režimi, veljavnimi v predhodnem obdobju, in novo shemo enotnega plačila v sektorjih, v katerih bi tak prehod lahko vplival na nekatere vrste kmetijstva.
The decision to grant coupled support was taken by the Member States on the basis of an analysis at national level of the potential negative effect of the immediate implementation of the SPS in the identified sectors. 
Odločitev o odobritvi vezane podpore so sprejele države članice na podlagi analize morebitnega negativnega učinka takojšnjega izvajanja SEP v opredeljenih sektorjih, izvedene na nacionalni ravni.
The ‘growing trend’ referred to by the Court is the result of the possibilities of ‘decou-pling’ offered by the legislation, either at the beginning of the SPS or later on the framework of the ‘Health check’ decisions. 
Vedno večje vključevanje, ki ga navaja Sodišče, je posledica možnosti nevezane pomoči, ki jih ponuja zakonodaja, in sicer na začetku izvajanja SEP ali pozneje v okviru odločitev v zvezi s sistematskim pregledom SKP.
There are several tools in the CAP that allow for supporting fragile sectors and/or regions, and Member States can decide which tools fit best to the specific needs of the sectors and/or regions. 
V okviru SKP je več orodij, ki omogočajo podpiranje občutljivih sektorjev in/ali regij, pri čemer se lahko države članice odločijo, katera orodja so najprimernejša za posebne potrebe sektorjev in/ali regij.
Pillar 1 coupled aids for sheep and goat and for suckler cow are essential in some regions to maintain the herds because the operating costs of those sectors may not always be covered by output and thus, in case of full decoupling, there is a high risk that farmers stop producing. 
Vezana pomoč iz prvega stebra za ovce in koze ter krave dojilje je v nekaterih regijah nujna za ohranjanje čred, ker materialnih stroškov teh sektorjev ni vedno mogoče pokriti s proizvodnjo, zato v primeru v celoti nevezane pomoči obstaja veliko tveganje, da bodo kmetje opustili proizvodnjo.
In the framework of the reform of the CAP towards 2020 and following a thorough assessment of the impacts towards the CAP objectives, the Commission has pro-posed32 that Member States may grant coupled support to farmers to a limited number of sectors or production and to finance this support by using up to a certain percentage of their annual national ceiling. 
V okviru reforme SKP proti letu 2020 in na podlagi podrobne ocene učinkov na cilje SKP je Komisija predla-gala32, da lahko države članice odobrijo vezano podporo kmetom za omejeno število sektorjev ali proizvodov in da za financiranje te podpore namenijo določen odstotek svoje letne nacionalne zgornje meje.