natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V. The Court did not find conclusive evidence to demonstrate that the audited schemes are in general a more effective tool than decoupled aid, allied with other EU and nationally funded measures, to maintain production and thus sustain economic activity in regions with few economic alternatives and generate environmental benefits. 
V. Sodišče ni našlo prepričljivih dokazov za to, da sta revidirani shemi na splošno uspešnejše sredstvo za ohranjanje proizvodnje in s tem gospodarske dejavnosti v regijah z malo drugimi gospodarskimi možnostmi ter za ustvarjanje koristi za okolje kot nevezana pomoč v povezavi z drugimi ukrepi, ki jih financirajo EU in države članice.
Additionally, there are weaknesses in the monitoring of key performance indicators and in assessing the ultimate social and environmental impacts of the schemes by the Commission and Member States, as well as a lack of coordination with other measures having similar objectives. 
Poleg tega so slabosti v spremljanju ključnih kazalnikov uspešnosti in ocenjevanju končnih socialnih in okoljskih učinkov shem, ki ju izvajajo Komisija in države članice, prav tako pa ni ustreznega usklajevanja z drugimi ukrepi, ki imajo podobne cilje.
SUMMARY VII. 
POVZETEK VII.
If the Commission’s proposal to continue voluntary coupled support beyond 2013 is accepted by the Council and the European Parliament, the Court recommends that the Commission should: (a) add a targeting requirement for coupled direct aid schemes for these sectors; (b) in coordination with Member States, clarify the most relevant types of farming activities to maintain production and thus address the ensuing social, economic and environmental aspects; (c) specifythemonitoringrequirementsandarrange-ments expected from Member States and implement a permanent monitoring framework that would indicate all direct aids paid to support the animal sectors in the Member States; (d) in coordination with Member States, undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the different support schemes affecting the sectors with a view to enhancing farm competitiveness. 
Če bosta Svet in Evropski parlament sprejela predlog Komisije, da se izvajanje prostovoljne vezane podpore nadaljuje tudi po letu 2013, Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija: (a) doda zahtevo po usmerjenosti za sheme vezane neposredne pomoči za te sektorje; (b) v sodelovanju z državami članicami ugotovi, katere vrste kmetijske dejavnosti so najustreznejše za ohranjanje proizvodnje, in tako obravnava posledične socialne, gospodarske in okoljske vidike; (c) natančneje opredeli zahteve in ureditve za spremljanje, ki jih morajo izpolniti države članice, ter uvede stalni okvir spremljanja za vse vrste neposredne pomoči, ki se izplačujejo v podporo živinorejskim sektorjem v državah članicah; (d) v sodelovanju z državami članicami izvede celovito oceno učinka različnih podpornih shem, ki zadevajo te sektorje, da se poveča konkurenčnost kmetij. Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP
9 INTRODUCTION THE BEEF AND VEAL AND SHEEPMEAT/GOATMEAT SECTORS IN THE EU 1. 
9 UVOD SEKTORJA GOVEJEGA IN TELEČJEGA MESA TER OVČJEGA IN KOZJEGA MESA V EU 1.
The sectors of beef and veal and sheepmeat and goatmeat (hereafter called ‘beef’ and sheepmeat/goatmeat sectors) are very important for EU agriculture. 
Sektorja govejega in telečjega mesa ter ovčjega in kozjega mesa (v nadaljevanju sektorja govejega ter ovčjega in kozjega mesa) sta za kmetijstvo EU zelo pomembna.
The EU is the third largest producer of beef and veal in the world with nearly 8 million tonnes of slaughtered cattle accounting for almost 12 % of world beef production2. 
EU je s skoraj 8 milijoni ton zaklanega goveda, kar pomeni skoraj 12 % svetovne proizvodnje govedine, tretja največja proizvajalka govejega in telečjega mesa na svetu2.
One third of the beef produced in the EU3 is a direct product of specialist beef producers maintaining ‘suckler cows’ that produce and feed calves. 
Tretjina govejega mesa, ki se proizvede v EU3, je neposredni proizvod specializiranih proizvajalcev govejega mesa, ki redijo „krave dojilje“ za proizvodnjo in hranjenje telet.
Suckler cow herds are generally fed under an extensive grazing system and their offspring once weaned are either sold directly for slaughter or to other specialists who fatten bovine animals under a more intensive production system before slaughter. 
Črede krav dojilj se na splošno krmijo v sistemih ekstenzivne paše, njihovi mladiči pa se po odstavitvi prodajo bodisi neposredno v zakol ali pa drugim specializiranim proizvajalcem, ki govedo pred zakolom redijo po sistemu bolj intenzivne reje.
According to the most recent data, the suckler cow herd in the EU has stabilised at around 12,4 million animals between 2000 and 20104. 
Po najnovejših podatkih se je število krav dojilj v čredi med letoma 2000 in 2010 ustalilo na okrog 12,4 milijona4.
Production in the sheepmeat/goatmeat sector, which had been stable at a little over 1 million tonnes in recent years, fell to 804 000 tonnes in 2009. 
Proizvodnja v sektorju ovčjega in kozjega mesa, ki je v zadnjih letih znašala nekaj več kot milijon ton, je v letu 2009 padla na 804 000 ton.
The size of the herd in the EU amounts to around 81 million sheep, down from 91 million in 2008, and 13 million goats. 
Velikost črede v EU znaša okrog 81 milijonov ovac (zmanjšanje glede na leto 2008, ko jih je bilo 91 milijonov) in 13 milijonov koz.
EU DIRECT AIDS TO THE BEEF AND SHEEPMEAT/ GOATMEAT SECTORS 3. 
NEPOSREDNA POMOČ EU ZA SEKTORJA GOVEJEGA TER OVČJEGA IN KOZJEGA MESA 3.
Farmers in the beef and sheepmeat/goatmeat sectors have historically been supported by different EU direct aids. 
Kmetje v sektorjih govejega ter ovčjega in kozjega mesa so tudi v preteklosti prejemali različne oblike neposredne pomoči EU.
The primary aim of providing support to these sectors has been to maintain production, ‘especially in areas where there is no alternative’ and ‘where such production is important for the local economy’5. 
Glavni cilj podpore tema sektorjema je bila ohranitev proizvodnje, „zlasti na območjih, kjer ni druge alternative“ in „kjer je takšna proizvodnja pomembna za lokalno gospodarstvo“5.
In order to be eligible for EU direct aids, farmers had to have premium rights (individual quotas) which constitute the quantitative limits for each Member State and were distributed to farmers upon application. 
Da bi bili upravičeni do neposredne pomoči EU, so kmetje morali pridobiti pravice do premije (individualne kvote), ki predstavljajo količinske omejitve za vsako državo članico in so bile razdeljene med kmete na podlagi zahtevkov.
Direct aids for farmers in these sectors include, inter alia, a basic premium and an additional/supplementary premium6 for suckler cows and ewe and goat. 
Neposredna pomoč za kmete v teh sektorjih med drugim vključuje osnovno premijo in dodatno premijo6 za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze.
These are headage-based7 premiums, which are designed to maintain numbers of productive animals that will deliver offspring (calves or lambs) that in turn provide supply to the processing industry (specialised fatteners or slaughterhouses). 
To so premije na glavo živine7, katerih namen je ohraniti število živali v plodni dobi, ki bodo dale mladiče (teleta in jagnjeta), s katerimi se oskrbuje predelovalna industrija (specializirani rejci ali klavnice).
2 Agriculture in the European Union — Statistical and economic information 2010, European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development DG. 
2 Kmetijstvo v Evropski uniji – Statistične in gospodarske informacije 2010, Evropska komisija, GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja.
3 For the EU as a whole, some two-thirds of the beef produced is derived directly or indirectly from dairy herds, a sector not covered in this audit. 
3 Približno dve tretjini govedine, ki se proizvede v EU, izhaja neposredno ali posredno iz čred krav molznic, torej sektorja, ki ni bil vključen v to revizijo.
4 Source: Eurostat. 
4 Vir: Eurostat.
5 See e.g. preamble of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 
1254/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za goveje in telečje meso (UL L 160, 26.6.1999, str.
21), recital 12 stating that ‘[...] it is opportune to allow Member States to establish a link between sensitive zones or localities and the production of suckler cows so as to ensure the maintenance of such production especially in areas where there is no other alternative’. 
21), v kateri je navedeno, da„[...] je umestno dovoliti državam članicam vzpostavitev povezave med občutljivimi območji ali kraji in rejo krav dojilj tako, da bi zagotovili vzdrževanje take proizvodnje, zlasti na območjih, kjer ni druge alternative.“ V zvezi z ovčjim ali kozjim mesom je v uvodni izjavi 11 preambule Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
For sheepmeat/goatmeat, the preamble of Council Regulation (EC) No 2529/2001 of 19 December 2001 on the common organisation of the market in sheepmeat and goatmeat (OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 
2529/2001 z dne 19. decembra 2001 o skupni ureditvi trga za ovčje in kozje meso (UL L 341, 22.12.2001, str.
3), recital 11 stated that ‘A link should be established between sensitive zones or localities and the production of sheep and goats so as to ensure the maintenance of such production, especially in areas where such production is important for the local economy’. 
3) navedeno: „Uveljaviti je treba povezavo med občutljivimi območji ali kraji in rejo ovac in koz, da bi zagotovili ohranitev te proizvodnje zlasti v območjih, kjer je ta proizvodnja pomembna za lokalno gospodarstvo.“ 6 Uredba (ES) št.
6 Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 established premium rates for the beef sector. 
1254/1999 določa stopnje premij za sektor govejega mesa.
Regulation (EC) No 2529/2001 established direct aids for the sheepmeat/ goatmeat sector. 
2529/2001 določa neposredno pomoč za sektor ovčjega in kozjega mesa.
7 Based on the number of animals. 
7 Temeljijo na številu živali.
The 2003 CAP reform introduced the notion of decoupling8 (i.e. removal of the link between the payment of a subsidy and the requirement for a specific production) in agricultural payments and a new scheme of EU direct aid support — the single payment scheme (SPS). 
Z reformo SKP iz leta 2003 sta bila uvedena pojem nevezanosti8 (odprava povezave med plačilom subvencije in zahtevo po opredeljeni proizvo-dnji) plačil v kmetijstvu in nova shema podpore z neposredno pomočjo EU – shema enotnega plačila (SEP).
As an exception to decoupling, where Member States considered that there was a risk of disturbance to agricultural markets or abandonment of production as a result of the move to the SPS, they had the option to maintain a proportion of direct aids in some sectors9 in their existing form, i.e. partial implementation of SPS10. 
Če so države članice menile, da zaradi prehoda na SEP obstaja nevarnost motenj na kmetijskih trgih ali opustitve proizvodnje, so imele možnost kot izjemo k nevezanosti plačil ohraniti del neposredne pomoči v nekaterih sektorjih9 v obstoječi obliki, t. i. delno izvajanje SEP10.
Eight Member States decided to use the option to maintain direct aids under partial implementation of SPS for suckler cow and/or ewe and goat (see Table 1). 
Osem držav članic se je odločilo za možnost, da ohranijo neposredne vrste pomoči v okviru delnega izvajanja SEP za krave dojilje in/ali ovce in koze (glej tabelo 1).
The suckler cow premiums were allowed to remain 100 % coupled, meaning that they could continue to be paid as before the reform. 
Premije za krave dojilje so lahko ostale 100-odstotno vezane, kar pomeni, da so se lahko izplačevale enako kot pred reformo.
For the ewe and goat premiums, 50 % coupling meant that only half of the annual financial envelopes that were available under the 2001 system were allowed to continue as coupled payments11 (other than for outermost regions12, where there is 100 % coupling). 
Pri premijah za ovce in koze je bila mogoča samo 50-odstotna vezanost, kar pomeni, da se je lahko le polovica letnih sredstev, ki so bila na voljo v okviru sistema iz leta 2001, še naprej izplačevala v obliki vezanih plačil11 (razen za najbolj oddaljene regije12, za katere velja 100-odstotna vezanost).
9 10 The single payment scheme came into operation on 1 January 2005. 
10 Shema enotnega plačila je začela veljati 1. januarja 2005.
Member States could choose to apply the SPS following a transitional period (which ended on 31 December 2005 or 31 December 2006), where this was justified on the grounds of special agricultural conditions. 
Države članice so se lahko odločile, da jo bodo začele uporabljati po prehodnem obdobju, ki se je zaključilo 31. decembra 2005 ali 31. decembra 2006, če so to upravičevali posebni kmetijski pogoji.
The legal basis for exercising the partial implementation of SPS option was provided for in Articles 64 to 68 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
Pravna podlaga za uporabo delnega izvajanja SEP je določena v členih od 64 do 68 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
11 The rest of the average amounts paid to farmers during a reference period (generally 2000–02) were integrated into the calculation of the SPS according to the option of calculation of entitlements chosen by each Member State. 
11 Preostanek povprečnih zneskov, ki so se kmetom izplačevali v referenčnem obdobju (na splošno 2000– 2002), je bil vključen v izračun SEP v skladu z možnostjo izračuna pravic, ki jo je izbrala posamezna država članica.
12 Regions which are part of the Member State, are situated outside Europe and are fully part of the EU. 
12 Regije, ki so del države članice, se nahajajo izven Evrope in so v celoti del EU.
There are nine such regions — six French, two Portuguese and one Spanish. 
Takšnih regij je devet – šest francoskih, dve portugalski in ena španska.
13 Spain, France and Slovenia decoupled the sheep and goat premium in calendar year 2010 while Denmark decoupled in calendar year 2012. 
13 Španija, Francija in Slovenija so uvedle nevezano premijo za ovce in koze v koledarskem letu 2010, Danska pa v koledarskem letu 2012.
Member State Sector Premium amount Austria, Belgium Suckler cow premium ο 200 euro per suckler cow; up to 50 euro additional premium. ο 10,50 euro per ewe; 3,50 euro supplementary premium; and 8,40 euro per goat1. 
10 Država članica Sektor Znesek premije Avstrija, Belgija premija za krave dojilje ο 200 EUR na kravo dojiljo; do 50 EUR dodatne premije ο 10,50 EUR na ovco; 3,50 EUR dodatne premi‐ je; in 8,40 EUR na kozo1 Danska, Finska, Slovenija premija za ovce in koze Francija, Portugalska, Španija premija za krave dojilje in premija za ovce in koze 1 Razen v primerih, ko se je število upravičencev po uvedbi nevezanih plačil znatno zmanjšalo, kar je omogočilo povečanje stopnje pomoči na kmeta.
In 2008, in the context of the mid-term review of the CAP, known as the ‘Health Check’, the Commission proposed14 the continuation of targeted selective decoupling using the arguments set out in Box 1. 
Leta 2008 je Komisija v okviru vmesnega pregleda SKP, znanega kot pregled stanja SKP, predlagala14 nadaljevanje usmerjene selektivne uvedbe nevezanih plačil na podlagi argumentov, navedenih v okviru 1.
Hence, upon entry into effect of the 2009 legislation15 following the ‘Health Check’, further decoupling of the direct aids to the meat producing sectors was introduced16. 
Zato se je z začetkom veljavnosti zakonodaje iz leta 200915 po pregledu stanja SKP nadaljevalo uvajanje nevezane neposredne pomoči za sektorje proizvodnje mesa16.
However, there was no change for the suckler cow and ewe and goat premiums, as Member States that in 2003 had opted for the partial implementation of SPS as regards these sectors were again allowed to continue with this option, with the emphasis on the allocation of funds on a regional needs basis17. 
Pri premijah za krave dojilje ter za ovce in koze pa ni prišlo do sprememb, saj je bilo državam članicam, ki so se leta 2003 odločile za delno izvajanje SEP v teh sektorjih, ponovno dovoljeno, da nadaljujejo s to možnostjo s poudarkom na dodeljevanju sredstev na osnovi regionalnih potreb17.
Furthermore, the possibility of providing support to the two sectors was widened via two measures linked to particular types of farming and agricultural activities (see Box 2). 
Možnost zagotavljanja podpore tema dvema sektorjema sta razširila dva ukrepa, povezana s posebnimi vrstami kmetovanja in kmetijskih dejavnosti (glej okvir 2).
17 Recital 34 of the preamble of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009: ‘[...] as regards the suckler cow and sheepmeat and goatmeat sector, maintaining a minimum level of agricultural production may still be necessary for the agricultural economies in certain regions and, in particular, where farmers cannot have recourse to other economic alternatives [...]’. 
17 Uvodna izjava 34 preambule Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009:„Kar pa se tiče sektorjev krav dojilj ter ovčjega in kozjega mesa, se zdi, da bo morda ohranjanje minimalne ravni kmetijske pridelave še vedno potrebno za kmetijska gospodarstva v nekaterih regijah in zlasti tam, kjer kmetje nimajo dostopa do drugih gospodarskih možnosti.“ 14 COM(2008) 306 final z dne 20 maja 2008.
15 Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (JO L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 
15 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št.
16), which entered into force as of January 2009. 
16), ki je začela veljati januarja 2009.
16 In the beef sector, the slaughter premium and the special premium for male animals were to be decoupled by 1 January 2012 at the latest. 
16 V sektorju govejega mesa je bilo treba najkasneje do 1. januarja 2012 uvesti nevezano klavno premijo in posebno premijo za moško govedo.
11 BOX 1 ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY THE COMMISSION FOR CONTINUING PARTIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF SPS IN THE AUDITED SECTORS ‘[...] the extent of recent reforms and the integration of more sectors into the SPS render the partially coupled support less relevant and often preventing farmers to achieve further competitiveness and market orientation. 
11 OKVIR 1 ARGUMENTI, KI JIH JE PREDSTAVILA KOMISIJA, ZA NADALJEVANJE DELNEGA IZVAJANJA SEP V REVIDIRANIH SEKTORJIH Zaradi obsega nedavnih reform in vključevanja več sektorjev v SEP je delno vezana podpora postala manj pomembna in pogosto preprečuje, da bi kmetje dosegli večjo konkurenčnost in tržno usmerjenost.
Moreover, in the cases of non profitable sectors farmers are worse off than farmers in a full decoupling situation receiving lower payments18. 
Poleg tega so v nedonosnih sektorjih kmetje v slabšem položaju kot tisti, za katere velja popolna nevezanost, saj prejemajo nižja plačila18.
Besides, farmers still receiving coupled aid have also to face both coupled and decoupled systems running in parallel, thus adding complexity and administrative costs without any income benefits. 
Kmetje, ki še vedno prejemajo vezano pomoč, se morajo soočati tako z vezanim kot nevezanim sistemom, ki potekata vzporedno, kar povečuje kompleksnost in upravne stroške, ne prinaša pa nikakršnih koristi pri prihodkih.
For the reasons mentioned above, move to full decoupling would be desirable. 
Zato bi bil zaželen prehod na v celoti nevezano pomoč.
In some specific cases a minimum level of agricultural production is important to sustain economic activity in regions with few economic alternatives, to ensure an adequate supply of raw materials to processing industries, or to generate environmental benefits.’ 
Vendar pa je v nekaterih primerih minimalna raven kmetijske proizvodnje pomembna za ohranjanje gospodarske dejavnosti v regijah z malo drugimi gospodarskimi možnostmi za zagotovitev ustrezne preskrbe predelovalne industrije s surovinami ali pa za doseganje okoljskih koristi.
18 This argument was already raised during the discussion in the Council that preceded the 2003 reform. 
18 Ta argument je bil omenjen že med razpravo v Svetu pred reformo leta 2003.
See Council ‘CAP reform: explanatory note DS 222/03’, Luxembourg, 18 June 2003. 
Glej dokument Sveta Reforma SKP – obrazložitev, DS 222/03, Luxembourg, 18. junija 2003.
The current trend in the Member States using the partial implementation option of SPS for these schemes is towards integrating the premiums into the SPS. 
Sedanji trend v državah članicah, ki uporabljajo možnost delnega izvajanja SEP za te sheme, kaže v smeri vključevanja premij v SEP.
This means that farmers who previously received payments under the audited schemes are now eligible to receive payments under SPS without the need to maintain animals. 
To pomeni, da so kmetje, ki so prej prejemali plačila v okviru revidiranih shem, zdaj upravičeni do plačil v okviru SEP, ne da bi morali ohraniti živali.
The ewe and goat premium has already been, or is planned to be, decoupled in most of these Member States, while France has partially decoupled the suckler cow premium from 2010. 
Večina držav članic je že uvedla nevezano premijo za ovce in koze ali pa to načrtuje, Francija pa je z letom 2010 uvedla delno nevezano premijo za krave dojilje.
As a result, the annual amounts under partial implementation measures fell from over 2 billion euro in 2006 (the year in which all Member States had changed over to the SPS) to a little over 1 billion euro in 2011 (see Table 2). 
Posledično so se letni zneski v okviru ukrepov delnega izvajanja znižali z več kot 2 milijardi EUR v letu 2006 (ko so vse države članice prešle na SEP) na nekaj več kot milijardo EUR leta 2011 (glej tabelo 2).
The Commission adopted legislative proposals for the CAP post 2013 establishing, amongst others, new rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the CAP19. 
Komisija je sprejela zakonodajne predloge za SKP za obdobje po letu 2013, v katerih je med drugim določila nova pravila za neposredna plačila kmetom po podpornih shemah v okviru SKP19.
According to Article 38(2) of this proposal ‘coupled support may only be granted to sectors or regions of a Member State where specific types of farming or specific agricultural sectors undergo certain difficulties and are particularly important for economic and/or social and/or environmental reasons’. Hence, in the beef and sheepmeat/goatmeat sectors, voluntary coupled support would still be allowed, thereby retaining the possibility for direct aids such as the audited schemes. 
V skladu s členom 38(2) tega predloga se lahko vezana podpora „odobri le sektorjem ali regijam države članice, v katerih se specifične vrste kmetovanja ali specifični kmetijski sektorji, ki so posebej pomembni iz gospodarskih in/ali socialnih razlogov, spopadajo s težavami.“ Tako bi bila v sektorjih govejega ter ovčjega in kozjega mesa prostovoljna vezana podpora še vedno dovoljena, kar pomeni, da bi se ohranila možnost neposrednih vrst pomoči, kot sta revidirani shemi.
19 Commission proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy — COM(2011) 625 final/2 of 19 October 2011. 
19 Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi pravil za neposredna plačila kmetom v podpornih shemah v okviru skupne kmetijske politike – COM(2011) 625 final/2 z dne 19. oktobra 2011.
Title IV, Chapter 1 describes the possibilities for voluntary coupled support which may be granted to certain sectors including sheepmeat and goatmeat and beef and veal up to 5 % of annual national ceilings and more than that in specific cases. 
V naslovu IV poglavja 1 so opisane možnosti prostovoljne vezane podpore, ki se lahko dodeli nekaterim sektorjem, vključno s sektorjema ovčjega in kozjega mesa ter govejega in telečjega mesa, v višini do 5 % letne nacionalne zgornje meje, v posebnih primerih pa tudi več.