natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The abovementioned EP opinion reflects the support of this institution for the measure to continue to be funded from the Common Agricultural Policy. 
Omenjeno mnenje EP odraža podporo te institucije nadaljnjemu financiranju ukrepa iz skupne kmetijske politike.
Recommendation 1 After having analysed in an extensive way the technical, political and legal elements of the programme (see the Impact Assessment supporting the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation), the Commission has concluded that the CAP was the appropriate frame for the continuation of the scheme. 
Priporočilo 1 Po temeljiti analizi tehničnih, političnih in pravnih elementov programa (glej oceno učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta), je Komisija ugotovila, da je skupna kmetijska politika ustrezen okvir za nadaljnje izvajanje programa.
The Commission is of the view that the programme is being implemented by Member States with a satisfactory level of coordination and consultation with all relevant actors although further progress in this domain is always to be pursued. 
Komisija meni, da države članice izvajajo program z zadovoljivo stopnjo usklajevanja in posvetovanja z vsemi zadevnimi akterji, čeprav si je treba vedno prizadevati za nadaljnji napredek na tem področju.
Recommendation 2 For years, the programme has had a powerful leverage effect on the development of food initiatives or related measures by private bodies (charities) and public authorities (Member State and local levels). 
Priporočilo 2 Program ima že leta močan spodbujevalni učinek na razvoj pobud v zvezi s hrano ali povezanih ukrepov javnih ustanov (dobro-delnih ustanovah) in javnih organov (na ravni držav članic in na lokalni ravni).
Such role can be further promoted. 
Tako vlogo je mogoče še naprej spodbujati.
While taking due account of the subsidiarity principle, several options to enhance the link between the scheme and other similar actions were analysed in the context of the Impact Assessment and some of them were included in the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation. 
Ob ustreznem upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti je bilo v okviru ocene učinka analiziranih več možnosti za izboljšanje povezave med programom in drugimi podobnimi ukrepi, nekatere od njih pa so bile vključene v predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta. ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 80.
One of the aims of this measure is to provide charities with a stable and reliable source of foodstuffs for assisting the most deprived persons. 
Eden od ciljev tega ukrepa je dobrodelnim ustanovam zagotoviti stabilen in zanesljiv vir živil za pomoč najbolj ogroženim osebam.
In this sense, the impact of the programme cannot be merely assessed on the average number of meals that it provides but on the extent to which it does contribute to the supply of charitable organisations. 
V tem smislu učinka programa ni mogoče ocenjevati samo glede na povprečno število obrokov, ki jih zagotovi, pač pa glede na obseg, v katerem prispeva k dobavi dobrodelnim ustanovam.
This aim is largely attained as far as the programme provides between 30 and 70 % of the total food distributed in the Community to the most deprived people, depending on the charities and the Member States. 
Ta cilj je v glavnem dosežen, saj program zagotavlja od 30 do 70 % (odvisno od dobrodelne organizacije in države članice) vseh živil, ki se razdelijo najbolj ogroženim v Skupnosti.
By virtue of the subsidiarity principle, Member States define the criteria of the population having access to the food aid distributed by this measure. 
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti države članice opredelijo merila glede tega, katera populacija ima dostop do živil, ki se razdelijo v okviru tega ukrepa.
Recommendation 3 The Commission already analysed this issue in the framework of the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation. 
Priporočilo 3 Komisija je to vprašanje že analizirala v okviru ocene učinka, ki spremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta.
It concluded that the respect of the subsidiarity principle goes along with a higher efficiency of the scheme when the targeting of the beneficiaries remains the Member State’s competence. 
Ugotovila je, da je zaradi spoštovanja načela subsidiarnosti učinkovitost sheme boljša, kadar so za določitev upravičencev pristojne države članice.
This position is supported by an overwhelming majority of stakeholders and coincides with the result of a public Internet consultation that received more that 14 000 replies. 
To stališče zagovarja tudi velika večina zainteresiranih strani, sklada pa se tudi z rezultati javnega internetnega posvetovanja, v okviru katerega je bilo zabeleženih 14 000 odzivov.
The Commission’s proposal for a new Council Regulation incorporates the obligation for Member States to prepare national food distribution programmes that would include comprehensive information on recipients and charities taking part in the programme. 
Predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta vključuje obveznost, da države članice pripravijo nacionalne programe razdeljevanja hrane, ki bodo vključevali celovite informacije o prejemnikih in dobrodelnih ustanovah, ki sodelujejo v programu.
Details will be laid down in the implementing rules after the adoption of the Commission proposal. 
Podrobnosti bodo po sprejetju predloga Komisije določene v izvedbenih pravilih.
Recommendation 4 The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation7 includes the removal of this restriction. 
Priporočilo 4 Predlog Komisije za novo uredbe Sveta7 določa tudi odpravo te omejitve.
By its very nature, such a scheme has to adapt to very different situations in the various participating Member States. 
Tak program se mora zaradi svoje narave prilagajati različnim razmeram v različnih sodelujočih državah članicah.
The needs of food aid vary hugely between individual aid recipients and over time. 
Potrebe po pomoči v hrani se močno razlikujejo pri posameznih prejemnikih pomoči in odvisno od časa.
The differences in the quantity of food distributed to every individual aid recipient can therefore not be presented as unequal treatment. 
Razlike v količini hrane, ki se razdeli vsakemu prejemniku, ne pomenijo neenake obravnave.
The setting of common standards would not necessarily result in improving the impact of the measure that, as proven in Box 5 of the Court’s report, is very substantial in the light of the share of food distributed by NGOs sourced from the EU programme. 
Z določitvijo skupnih standardov se ne bi nujno izboljšal učinek ukrepa, ki je, kot je razvidno iz okvira 5 poročila Sodišča, zelo pomemben glede na delež živil iz programa EU, ki jih razdelijo NVO.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Recommendation 5 Introducing standards at Community level could hinder the necessary flexibility the programme must preserve in order to adapt to the varied circumstances of the most deprived. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Priporočilo 5 Z določitvijo standardov na ravni Skupnosti bi se verjetno omejila potrebna prožnost, ki jo mora program ohraniti, da se prilagodi različnim razmeram, v katerih živijo najbolj ogroženi.
The Commission considers that the way the programme is currently run, with a large element of subsidiarity built in it, attains a significant impact and allows an equal treatment to all the aid recipients. 
Komisija meni, da je na način, kot se program vodi sedaj – z veliko mero vgrajene subsidiarnosti – dosežen velik učinek in omogočena enaka obravnava vseh prejemnikov pomoči.
The Commission, also based on its audits, can claim that Member States implementation is globally satisfactory even if certain areas may improve further. 
Komisija lahko tudi na podlagi svojih revizij trdi, da države članice na splošno zadovoljivo izvajajo program, čeprav je mogoče nekatera področja še izboljšati.
The method for the allocation of financial resources is transparent and based on the best statistical information available. 
Metoda za dodeljevanje finančnih sredstev je pregledna in temelji na najboljših dostopnih statističnih podatkih.
Year after year, participating Member States endorse this method when voting in favour of the annual plans in the Management Committee. 
Države članice vsako leto podprejo to metodo, kadar gla-sujejo v korist letnih načrtov v upravljalnem odboru.
Recommendation 6 In the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation, a series of measurable objectives has been proposed. 
Priporočilo 6 V oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta, je predlagana vrsta merljivih ciljev.
The Commission will consider introducing corresponding performance indicators in the framework of the revision of the implementing rules after the adoption of the new Council Regulation. 
Komisija bo po sprejetju nove uredbe Sveta proučila, ali naj uvede ustrezne kazalnike učinkovitosti v okviru pregleda izvedbenih pravil.
The Commission has equally expressed its intention to reinforce Member States’ reporting obligations in particular through the new national food distribution programmes, in order to ensure a better follow-up of the scheme and improve its planning and management over time. 
Komisija je prav tako izrazila svoj namen, da poveča obveznosti držav članic glede poročanja, zlasti v okviru novih nacionalnih programov razdeljevanja hrane, da bi zagotovila boljše spremljanje programa ter sčasoma izboljšala njegovo načrtovanje in upravljanje.
Directive 2004/18/EC on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, provides a common legal basis throughout the EU. 
Direktiva 2004/18/ES o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev, določa skupno pravno podlago v vsej EU.
The audits carried out by the Commission conclude to the compliance of the call for tenders run by the Member States with the Directive. 
Pri revizijah, ki jih je opravila Komisija, se je izkazalo, da so javni razpisi, ki jih vodijo države članice, skladni z Direktivo.
Differences in modalities found in the Member States are foreseen in the Directive. 
V Direktivi so predvidene razlike med državami članicami.
Sometimes operators take part in tenders organised in other Member States. 
Dobavitelji včasih sodelujejo na javnih razpisih, ki jih organizirajo druge države članice.
Recommendation 7 The Commission already analysed the question of the tendering procedures in the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation including some ideas for enhancing the EU-wide publicity of the tenders. 
Priporočilo 7 Komisija je vprašanje postopkov javnih naročil že analizirala v oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, vključno z nekaterimi zamislimi za povečanje medijske pozornosti javnim razpisom v celi EU.
Detailed rules may be laid down in the new implementing rules after the adoption of a new Council Regulation. 
Podrobna pravila bodo lahko določena v novih izvedbenih pravilih po sprejetju nove uredbe Sveta.
The Commission will examine the proposition of the Court as regards the adaptation of the bartering arrangements without nevertheless preventing the possibility to mobilise intervention stocks as this practice is at the core of the scheme. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 
Komisija bo proučila predlog Sodišča v zvezi s prilagoditvijo mehanizma blagovne menjave, ne da bi preprečevala vključitev intervencijskih zalog, saj je ta praksa v središču programa. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod ODGOVORI KOMISIJE
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 6/2009 European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2009 — 56 pp. — 21 􏰋 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-340-4 doi: 10.2865/2420 REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 59 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Evropsko računsko sodišče Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2009 – 56 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-352-7 doi: 10.2865/26372 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 59 Posebno poročilo št.
You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://bookshop.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758. 
Njihovi kontaktni podatki so na voljo na povezavi http://bookshop.europa.eu ali po faksu +352 2929-42758.
You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://ec.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758. 
Njihovi kontaktni podatki so na voljo na povezavi http://ec.europa.eu ali po faksu +352 2929-42758.
THE MEASURE WAS FIRST INTRODUCED IN 1987, BY USING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS IN PUBLIC INTERVENTION STOCKS, AND IS STILL APPLIED IN CERTAIN MEMBER STATES. 
UKREP JE BIL UVEDEN LETA 1987, ZA NJEGOVO IZVAJANJE SO BILI UPORABLJENI KMETIJSKI PROIZVODI V INTERVENCIJSKIH ZALOGAH IN SE ŠE VEDNO IZVAJA V NEKATERIH DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH.
THE REPORT DEMONSTRATES THAT THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME, ESPECIALLY THAT FOR THE ‘CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS THE WELL-BEING’ OF THE MOST NEEDY REMAIN VALID, AND MAKES A SERIES OF RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT INCREASING THE IMPACT OF THE MEASURE. 
IZ POROČILA JE RAZVIDNO, DA SO CILJI PROGRAMA, ZLASTI„PRISPEVATI K BLAGINJI“ OGROŽENIH OSEB, ŠE VEDNO VELJAVNI, HKRATI PA VSEBUJE VRSTO PRIPOROČIL, NAMENJENIH POVEČANJU UČINKA UKREPA.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-09-007-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJ-AB-09-007-SL-C
Special Report No 8 2009 ISSN 1831-0834 
Posebno poročilo št.
Special Report No 8 2009 ‘NETWORKS OF EXCELLENCE’ AND ‘INTEGRATED PROJECTS’ IN COMMUNITY RESEARCH POLICY: DID THEY ACHIEVE THEIR OBJECTIVES? (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 8 2009 „MREŽE ODLIČNOSTI“ IN „INTEGRIRANI PROJEKTI“ V RAZISKOVALNI POLITIKI SKUPNOSTI: ALI SO DOSEGLI SVOJE CILJE? (V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 248(4) ES) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
2 EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-45410 Fax +352 4398-46410 E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Special Report No 8 2009 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). 
2 EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-45410 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: euraud@eca.europa.eu Spletni naslov: http://www.eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9207-408-1 doi:10.2865/63596 © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9207-420-3 doi:10.2865/67415 © Evropski skupnosti, 2009 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
4 Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 5 GLOSSARY European Research Area (ERA): A border-free zone for research, in which scientific resources will be better deployed to create more jobs and to improve Europe’s competitiveness. 
8/2009 – „Mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje? 5 GLOSAR Evropski raziskovalni prostor (ERP): Območje brez meja za raziskave, kjer se bodo znanstveni viri bolje uporabljali, da se ustvari več delovnih mest in izboljša konkurenčnost Evrope.
RTD Framework Programmes (FPs): Multiannual programmes establishing, for a given period, the scientific and technological activities to be funded by the Community, their budget and the detailed rules for their technical and financial implementation. 
Okvirni programi RTR (OP): Večletni programi, v katerih so za določeno obdobje določene znanstvene in tehnološke dejavnosti, ki jih financira Skupnost, njihov proračun ter podrobna pravila za njihovo tehnično in finančno izvajanje.
RTD Instruments: Different types of projects defined by the FPs. 
Instrumenti RTR: Različne vrste projektov, opredeljene v OP.
Each instrument addresses specific objectives and involves particular participation arrangements. 
Vsak instrument obravnava posebne cilje in zajema posebne ureditve za udeležbo.
Networks of Excellence (NoE): Instrument aimed at creating substantial and lasting integration of the research activities of the network partners, thus directly tackling the fragmentation of research activities in Europe in a given area. 
Mreže odličnosti: Instrument, katerega cilj je ustvariti močno in trajno povezovanje raziskovalnih dejavnosti partnerjev v mreži in tako na določenem področju neposredno odpravljati razdrobljenost raziskovalnih dejavnosti v Evropi.
Integrated Projects (IPs): Instrument designed to achieve ambitious, clearly defined scientific and technological objectives of a European dimension. 
Integrirani projekti: Instrument, zasnovan za doseganje ambicioznih, jasno opredeljenih znanstvenih in tehnoloških ciljev z evropsko razsežnostjo.
Gross domestic product (GDP): The total market value of all final goods and services produced in a country in a given year. 
Bruto domači proizvod (BDP): Celotna tržna vrednost vseh končnih izdelkov in storitev, ki jih država proizvede v določenem letu.
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Enterprises which employ fewer than 250 persons and which have an annual turnover not exceeding 50 million euro, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding 43 million euro. 
Mala in srednje velika podjetja (MSP): Podjetja, ki zaposlujejo manj kot 250 ljudi, in katerih letna realizacija ne presega 50 milijonov EUR in/ali letna bilanca stanja ne presega 43 milijonov EUR.
SMART objectives: Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed objectives, as defined by the EU Financial Regulation. Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
Cilji SMART: Specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, ustrezni in časovno opredeljeni cilji, kot jih določa Finančna uredba EU. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2009 – „Mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje?
6 Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? I. European research is held to suffer from insufficient and dispersed investment. 
6 Posebno poročilo št. 8/2009 – „Mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje? I. Za evropske raziskave se meni, da trpijo zaradi nezadostnih in razpršenih naložb.
As part of the EU actions to remedy this, the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) introduced two new instruments, ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’. 
Za omilitev tega stanja sta bila v okviru ukrepov EU s šestim okvirnim programom (6. OP) uvedena dva nova instrumenta, „mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“.
The aim was, on one side, to create a substantial and lasting integration of the research activities and, on the other side, to achieve ambitious, clearly defined scientific and technological objectives of a European dimension. 
Po eni strani je bil cilj ustvariti močno in trajno povezovanje raziskovalnih dejavnosti, po drugi strani pa doseči ambiciozne, jasno opredeljene znanstvene in tehnološke cilje z evropsko razsežnostjo.
The audit examined to what extent ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ had contributed to achieve the research policy objectives set by the Treaty as well as their own specific objectives, the Commission had effectively managed the new instruments and FP6 had stimulated RTD investment. 
V okviru revizije je bilo preučeno, v kolikšnem obsegu so „mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ prispevali k doseganju ciljev raziskovalne politike, določenih s Pogodbo, in doseganju lastnih posebnih ciljev, kako uspešno je Komisija upravljala nove instrumente in v kolikšni meri je 6.
The Court concluded that: (i) The FP6 instruments audited were successful in promoting research collaboration and projects of reasonable quality. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da: (i) so bili revidirani instrumenti 6. OP uspešni pri spodbujanju raziskovalnega sodelovanja in projektov primerne kakovosti.
However these instruments have operated in the absence of an explicit intervention logic, as well as of SMART objectives and performance indicators. (ii) The specific objectives of the new instruments were only partially achieved. ‘Networks of Excellence’ promoted a good level of research collaboration, but often did not achieve a progressive and self-sustainable integration of the research activities between the network partners. ‘Integrated Projects’ promoted high-quality research collaboration, but did not attract more resources from individual participants nor additional sources of public and private financing. 
Vendar so ti instrumenti delovali brez jasno izražene logike posega in ciljev SMART ter kazalnikov uspešnosti. (ii) Posebni cilji novih instrumentov so bili samo delno doseženi. „Mreže odličnosti“ so spodbudile zadovoljivo stopnjo raziskovalnega sodelovanja, vendar pogosto niso dosegle postopnega samostojnega povezovanja raziskovalnih dejavnosti med partnerji v mreži. „Integrirani projekti“ so spodbudili visokokakovostno raziskovalno sodelovanje, vendar niso pritegnili niti več sredstev od posameznih udeležencev niti dodatnih virov javnega in zasebnega financiranja. POODVGZOEVTOE KR I KOMISIJE
The participation of the private sector even diminished in relative terms. 
Sodelovanje zasebnega sektorja je bilo v relativnem smislu celo manjše.
The target of 15 % of the total budget of FP6 thematic priorities for SME participation was not achieved. 
Končni cilj, da se od skupnega proračuna za tematske prednostne naloge v 6. OP 15 % nameni za udeležbo MSP, ni bil dosežen.
The Court recalls its previous recommendation that spending programmes should be based upon an explicit intervention logic, linking the instruments to realistic objectives. 
Sodišče opozarja na svoje v preteklosti podano priporočilo, da bi morali programi porabe temeljiti na jasno izraženi logiki posega, ki povezuje instrumente s stvarnimi cilji.
In this context, the possibility of setting one single objective for each instrument should be considered in order to ensure clarity of the instruments’ specific role. 
V tem kontekstu bi bilo treba razmisliti o možnosti določitve enega samega cilja za vsak instrument, da se zagotovi jasnost posebne vloge instrumentov.
For each programme there should be appropriate performance indicators to monitor the expected outputs, outcomes and impacts. 
Za vsak program bi morali obstajati ustrezni kazalniki uspešnosti za spremljanje predvidenih izložkov, izidov in učinkov.
ER XE PE CL YU OT I FV ET H E SC UO M M M M AI S R S Y I O N V. The Court also recommends that: (i) The Commission should consider whether NoEs and IP-like collaborative projects have realistic objectives and provide significant advantages as compared with traditional instruments for research collaboration. 
POODVGZOEVTOE KR I KOMISIJE V. Poleg tega Sodišče priporoča: (i) Komisija naj razmisli, ali imajo mreže odličnosti in skupni projekti, podobni integriranim projektom, stvarne cilje in ali v primerjavi s tradicionalnimi instrumenti za raziskovalno sodelovanje zagotavljajo pomembne prednosti. V zvezi z mrežami odličnosti, ki so bile financirane v okviru 6.