natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In relation to more regular reporting, such as that introduced under the Six‐pack and Two‐pack through the stability programmes in the spring and draft budgetary plans in the autumn, there are detailed requirements set out regarding what a Member State is obliged to report. 
V zvezi z rednejšim poročanjem, kot je na primer tisto, ki je bilo uvedeno v okviru šesterčka in dvojčka prek programov stabilnosti spomladi in osnutkov proračunskih načrtov jeseni, so določene podrobne zahteve glede tega, o čem mora poročati država članica.
According to Article 7(2) of Regulation 473/2013, in the case where the Commission is not satisfied that a Member State’s DBP adequately demonstrates its fiscal plans to be in compliance with its requirement, the Commission may request that the Member State concerned re‐submit its DBP. 
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 7(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 473/2013 od države članice zahteva, naj ponovno predloži svoj osnutek proračunskega načrta, če meni, da v njenem osnutku proračunskega načrta ni ustrezno dokazano, da je njen fiskalni načrt skladen z zahtevami.
However, where the Member State does not comply with the more general reporting requirements, it is true that the Commission’s options for enforce‐ ment are limited, in particular concerning the stability programmes. 
Vendar je res, da so možnosti Komisije glede izvrševanja, kadar država članica ne izpolnjuje splošnejših zahtev glede poročanja, omejene, zlasti v zvezi s programi stabilnosti.
86 Fiscal surveillance documents (such as the Stability and Convergence Programmes or the Draft Budgetary Plans) including those reporting on compliance with the Council recommendations (reports on action taken), may some‐ times lack concrete information on corrective measures, notably for the outer years. This is reflected in the Commis‐ sion forecasts, which form the basis of the risk assessments of the Member States’ plans. 
86 Dokumenti v zvezi s fiskalnim nadzorom (kot so programi stabilnosti in konvergenčni programi ali osnutki proračunskih načrtov), vključno s poročili o skladnosti s priporočili Sveta (poročila o sprejetih ukrepih), včasih ne vsebujejo konkretnih informacij o popravljalnih ukrepih, zlasti za zadnja leta zadevnega obdobja To se kaže v napovedih Komisije, ki so podlaga za ocene tveganja v zvezi z načrti držav članic.
Indeed, in cases where the corrective measures are considered to be insufficiently specified, they are not taken into account in the forecast. 
Kadar se šteje, da so popravljalni ukrepi nezadostno opredeljeni, se v napovedi ne upoštevajo.
Furthermore, if the lack of concrete information weights on the balance of risks, risks are always clearly mentioned in the Commission assessments. 
Če je zaradi pomanjkanja konkretnih informacij vprašljiva uravnoteženost tveganj, se tveganja vedno jasno navedejo v ocenah Komisije.
Box 8 – First indent The list of measures with fiscal impact is part of the convergence programme and not primarily the national reform programme. 
Okvir 8, prva alinea Seznam ukrepov s fiskalnim učinkom je del konvergenčnega programa in ne predvsem nacionalnega programa reform.
Box 8 – Second indent The Commission highlights the fact that convergence programme 2012 presents the impact of measures in three separate tables – one from the perspective of direct tax reform (revenue side measures), the second providing a detailed breakdown of planned consolidation measures with an impact on the deficit and the third summariz‐ ing smaller changes valid since 2012 (only expenditure side). 
Okvir 8, druga alinea Komisija poudarja, da je v konvergenčnem programu za leto 2012 učinek ukrepov prikazan v treh ločenih preglednicah – ena kaže ta učinek z vidika reforme neposrednih davkov (ukrepi na strani prihodkov), druga kaže podrobno razčlenitev načrtovanih ukrepov za konsolidacijo z vplivom na primanjkljaj, tretja pa povzema manjše spremembe, ki veljajo od leta 2012 (samo na strani odhodkov).
Although not every single measure is described in the accompanying text, the titles are sufficiently detailed and understandable. 
Čeprav v spremljajočem besedilu niso opisani vsi posamezni ukrepi, so naslovi dovolj podrobni in razumljivi.
Reply of the Commission 123 Reply to the heading above paragraph 88 The Commission does not agree that its monitoring and surveillance lack transparency. 
Odgovori Komisije 123 Odgovor na naslov pred točko 88 Komisija se ne strinja, da njeno spremljanje in nadzor nista pregledna.
The legislative changes introduced had to be technically operationalised. 
Uvedene zakonodajne spremembe je bilo treba tehnično uveljaviti.
To this end, the methodologies and clas‐ sifications utilised in assessing compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) had to be adapted. 
Za ta namen je bilo treba prilagoditi metodologije in razvrstitve, ki se uporabljajo pri ocenjevanju skladnosti s Paktom za stabilnost in rast (SGP).
This process took place through extensive discussions in the Economic and Financial Committee (EFC) and other competent instances of the Council. 
Ta postopek je potekal z obširnimi razpravami v Ekonomsko-finančnem odboru (EFC) in drugih pristojnih organih Sveta.
The increased complexity of the surveillance framework called for additional explanation in a spirit of transparency. 
Zaradi povečane kompleksnosti okvira za nadzor so bila potrebna dodatna pojasnila v smislu preglednosti.
Therefore, all the approaches to the implementation of the revised framework were summarised in the Vade Mecum on the Stability and Growth Pact, publicly available on the Commission’s website. 
Zato so bili vsi pristopi k izvajanju revidiranega okvira povzeti v Vademekumu o Paktu za stabilnost in rast, ki je javno objavljen na spletni strani Komisije.
The Vade Mecum will now be updated annually in line with a commitment in the Commission Communication of 21 October 2015 on Completing EMU. 
Vademekum se bo zdaj letno posodabljal v skladu z zavezo iz Sporočila Komisije z dne 21. oktobra 2015 o korakih za dokončanje ekonomske in monetarne unije.
In order to further increase transparency, since spring 2014 the Commission agreed to provide Member States with all the necessary information to replicate the underlying computations related to the compliance assessment under both the preventive and the corrective arm, including detailed excel spreadsheets providing step‐by‐step calcula‐ tions. 
Da bi Komisija nadalje povečala preglednost, od pomladi 2014 državam članicam zagotavlja vse potrebne informacije za ponovitev zadevnih izračunov v zvezi z ocenjevanjem skladnosti, za preventivni in popravljalni del, vključno s podrobnimi Excelovimi preglednicami, ki predstavljajo postopne izračune.
Regarding discretionary measures, the Commission has made fully public aggregate data series on the impact of discretionary measures and the level of one‐offs since spring 2014 and, in line with the Ecofin Council Conclu‐ sions of June 2014, has made further progress by sharing with the Member States the yield of key individual tax measures incorporated in the bottom‐up approach for EDP countries as of spring 2015. 
Kar zadeva diskrecijske ukrepe, Komisija od pomladi 2014 v celoti javno objavlja sklope zbirnih podatkov o vplivu diskrecijskih ukrepov in stopnji enkratnih ukrepov ter je v skladu s Sklepi Sveta Ecofin iz junija 2014 naredila še en korak naprej, saj je od pomladi 2015 države članice obveščala o rezultatih ključnih individualnih davčnih ukrepov, vključenih v pristop od spodaj navzgor za države, vključene v postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
Furthermore, the Commission has made available detailed information on the main measures in the Staff Working Documents which accompany new EDP recommendations, including the forecast of key variables for the compu‐ tation of the fiscal effort under the baseline scenario (e.g. the point of reference to which future forecasts will be compared in order to compute both the top‐down and the bottom‐up approach). 
Poleg tega je dala Komisija na voljo podrobne informacije o glavnih ukrepih v delovnih dokumentih služb Komisije, ki so priloženi novim priporočilom v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, vključno z napovedjo ključnih spremenljivk za izračun fiskalnega napora po osnovnem scenariju (npr. referenčna točka, s katero se bodo primerjale prihodnje napovedi za izračun po pristopu od zgoraj navzdol in od spodaj navzgor).
The methodological framework for assessing the impact of structural reforms upon fiscal sustainability was outlined in a note provided to Member States through the EFC‐A in February 2015. 
Metodološki okvir za ocenjevanje vpliva strukturnih reform na fiskalno vzdržnost je bil predstavljen v dopisu, posredovanem državam članicam prek namestnikov Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora februarja 2015.
89 (ii) The Commission would like to clarify in relation to the Court’s observation 89 (ii) that the effective action meth‐ odology, which was endorsed by the Council in 2014, is wider‐ranging than just the bottom‐up methodology, also incorporating a top‐down approach to assessing effective action. 
89 (ii) Komisija želi v zvezi z opažanjem Sodišča 89(ii) pojasniti, da je metodologija uspešnih ukrepov, ki jo je Svet potrdil leta 2014, širša od zgolj metodologije od spodaj navzgor in da vključuje tudi pristop od zgoraj navzdol za ocenjevanje uspešnih ukrepov.
The methodology is explained in Part II.1 of the Public Finance Report 2014. 
Metodologija je pojasnjena v delu II.1 Poročila o javnih financah v letu 2014.
Reply of the Commission 124 90 The compliance with EDP recommendations is ultimately checked using actual data, verified by Eurostat, rather than the Commission’s forecasts. 
Odgovori Komisije 124 90 Skladnost s priporočili v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem se na koncu preveri z uporabo dejanskih podatkov, ki jih preveri Eurostat, in ne napovedi Komisije.
Moreover, an assessment of effective action, known as a careful analysis, is con‐ ducted if the Member State fails to meet either its headline deficit targets or required improvement in the structural balance. 
Poleg tega se ocenjevanje uspešnega ukrepa, znano kot natančna analiza, izvede, če država članica ne izpolni ciljev glede nominalnega primanjkljaja ali ne doseže zahtevanega izboljšanja strukturnega salda.
Box 9 – Sixth indent The Commission broadly agrees that the assessment of effective action has become increasingly complex. 
Okvir 9, šesta alinea Komisija se na splošno strinja, da ocenjevanje uspešnih ukrepov postaja vse bolj kompleksno.
It takes better account of more complex economic situations as well as adding new surveillance elements, ensuring equality of treatment across countries and time required transparent operationalisation of the rules (see Commission’s reply to paragraph 89). 
Bolje upošteva kom-pleksnejše gospodarske razmere in dodaja nove elemente nadzora za zagotavljanje enakega obravnavanja v vseh državah in časa, potrebnega za pregledno uveljavitev pravil (glej odgovor Komisije na točko 89).
91 The top‐down and bottom‐up approaches are the reflection of the need to better capture prevailing economic situ‐ ations. 
91 Pristopa od zgoraj navzdol in od spodaj navzgor izhajata iz potrebe po boljšem upoštevanju prevladujočih gospodarskih razmer.
The note reviewing the methodology on the effective action assessment, including the operationalization of the bottom‐up approach (Review of the methodology for assessing effective action) was first discussed on 26 Feb‐ ruary 2014 at the EFC‐A, approved by the EFC on 12 June 2014 and endorsed by the Ecofin Council on 20 June 2014. 
O dopisu o pregledu metodologije o ocenjevanju uspešnih ukrepov, vključno z uveljavitvijo pristopa od spodaj navzgor (Pregled metodologije za ocenjevanje uspešnih ukrepov), so namestniki Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora prvič razpravljali 26. februarja 2014, Ekonomsko-finančni odbor ga je odobril 12. junija 2014, Svet Ecofin pa ga je potrdil 20. junija 2014.
The Commission recognises that there is a natural trade‐off between defining the approach taken as much as possi‐ ble in terms of capturing the underlying macroeconomic situation and developments, and the degree of complexity of the system of rules. 
Komisija priznava, da obstaja naravni kompromis med opredelitvijo takega pristopa, ki čim bolj upošteva zadevno makroekonomsko stanje in gibanje, ter stopnjo kompleksnosti sistema pravil.
However, following a specific request from the Member States, these data are not fully public, but shared via a common platform named CIRCA, to which only the members of the EFC and their alternates in the Ministries are granted access. 
Vendar ti podatki zaradi posebne zahteve držav članic niso povsem javni, temveč se posredujejo prek skupne platforme CIRCA, do katere imajo dostop samo člani Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora in njihovi namestniki v ministrstvih.
92 The assessment of the fiscal effort is centred around the structural balance since the 2005 reforms of the SGP, which sought to better take account of the effect of the economic cycle on Member States’ fiscal positions. 
92 Ocenjevanje fiskalnega napora je od reform Pakta za stabilnost in rast v letu 2005, katerih namen je bil bolje upoštevati učinek gospodarskega cikla na fiskalno stanje držav članic, osredotočeno na strukturni saldo.
It is true that the structural balance is intrinsically linked to estimates of potential growth, which is an unobservable variable. 
Res je, da je strukturni saldo sam po sebi povezan z ocenami potencialne rasti, ki je nemerljiva spremenljivka.
This reflects the limits of macroeconomics and cannot be escaped as long as the structural balance remains a key ele‐ ment of fiscal measurement as mandated by the Regulation. 
Tukaj so vidne omejitve makroekonomije, čemur se ni mogoče izogniti, dokler strukturni saldo ostaja ključni element fiskalnega merjenja, kot zahteva Uredba.
A detailed common approach to estimating potential output is agreed with Member States through the long‐stand‐ ing Output Gap Working Group and endorsed by the Council. 
Podroben skupni pristop k oceni potencialne proizvodnje je bil z državami članicami dogovorjen prek že dolgo obstoječe delovne skupine za proizvodno vrzel in Svet ga je odobril.
Reply of the Commission 125 94 The Code of Conduct suggests that a ‘bottom‐up’ estimation of the fiscal effort (that is, one that typically focuses on the estimated budgetary impact of discretionary fiscal measures) should complement the estimation of the fiscal effort yielded by the change in the structural balance (or ‘top‐down’ approach). 
Odgovori Komisije 125 94 V kodeksu ravnanja je navedeno, naj ocena fiskalnega napora „od spodaj navzgor“ (tj. taka, ki se značilno osredotoča na ocenjeni proračunski vpliv diskrecijskih fiskalnih ukrepov) dopolni oceno fiskalnega napora, ki nastane s spremembo strukturnega salda (oziroma pristop „od zgoraj navzdol“).
The note reviewing the methodol‐ ogy on the effective action assessment, including the operationalization of the bottom‐up approach (Review of the methodology for assessing effective action) was first discussed on 26 February 2014 at the EFC‐A, approved by the EFC on 12 June 2014 and endorsed by the Ecofin Council on 20 June 2014. 
O dopisu o pregledu metodologije o ocenjevanju uspešnih ukrepov, vključno z uveljavitvijo pristopa od spodaj navzgor (Pregled metodologije za ocenjevanje uspešnih ukrepov), so namestniki Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora prvič razpravljali 26. februarja 2014, Ekonomsko-finančni odbor ga je odobril 12. junija 2014, Svet ECOFIN pa ga je potrdil 20. junija 2014.
This methodology builds on the estimated budgetary impact of discretionary measures on the revenue side and takes into account both explicit and implicit measures on the expenditure side. 
Ta metodologija temelji na proračunskem vplivu diskrecijskih ukrepov na strani prihodkov ter upošteva izrecne in implicitne ukrepe na strani odhodkov.
In terms of discretionary measures, the Commission has ensured a concrete follow‐up to its transparency commit‐ ments by (i) making available for each country the impact of discretionary measures (current/capital revenue as well as current/capital expenditure) and the level of one‐offs in the AMECO database online (i.e. the fully public Commis‐ sion database) since spring 2014 ii) sharing with the Member States through the CIRCA platform, the main discre‐ tionary tax measures incorporated in the bottom‐up approach for EDP countries as of spring 2015. 
V zvezi z diskrecijskimi ukrepi je Komisija zagotovila konkretno nadaljnje ukrepanje glede svojih zavez o preglednosti, tako da (i) za vsako državo od pomladi 2014 daje na voljo vpliv diskrecijskih ukrepov (tekoči/kapitalski prihodki in tekoči/kapitalski odhodki) in ravni enkratnih ukrepov v spletni zbirki podatkov AMECO (tj. v povsem javni zbirki podatkov Komisije) ter da (ii) države članice prek platforme CIRCA od pomladi 2015 obvešča o glavnih diskrecijskih davčnih ukrepih, vključenih v pristop od spodaj navzgor za države v postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
95 The Commission does not agree that its analysis have become less transparent. 
95 Komisija se ne strinja, da je njena analiza postala manj pregledna.
The EU fiscal framework has undergone several changes in recent years with a view to introducing complementary rules, strengthening compliance mechanisms and raising national ownership. 
V zadnjih letih je bil fiskalni okvir EU večkrat spremenjen, da bi se uvedla dopolnilna pravila, okrepili mehanizmi skladnosti in povečala nacionalna odgovornost.
The rule were also made more apt to deal with differing economic conditions. 
Tudi pravila so postala ustreznejša za obravnavo različnih gospodarskih razmer.
The legislative changes had to be technically operationalised. 
Zakonodajne spremembe je bilo treba tehnično uveljaviti.
To this end, the methodologies and classifications utilised in assessing compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) had to be adapted. 
Za ta namen je bilo treba prilagoditi metodologije in razvrstitve, ki se uporabljajo pri ocenjevanju skladnosti s Paktom za stabilnost in rast (SGP).
The Vade Mecum will now be updated annually in line with a commitment in the Commission Communication of 21 October 2015 on Completing EMU (see Commission’s replies to paragraphs 88‐94). 
Vademekum se bo zdaj letno posodabljal v skladu z zavezo iz Sporočila Komisije z dne 21. oktobra 2015 o korakih za dokončanje ekonomske in monetarne unije (glej odgovore Komisija na točke 88–94).
Reply of the Commission 126 96 In relation to the top‐down approach, while the necessary data to replicate the Commission’s calculations were not systematically available outside the Commission until 2014, the Commission has made significant efforts to correct this and now aims at insuring full transparency by giving access to all relevant data to the Member States. 
Odgovori Komisije 126 96 Kar zadeva pristop od zgoraj navzdol, podatki, potrebni za ponovitev izračunov Komisije, sicer niso bili sistematično na voljo zunaj Komisije do leta 2014, vendar si je Komisija zelo prizadevala, da bi to popravila, zato je zdaj njen cilj zagotoviti popolno preglednost s tem, da državam članicam omogoča dostop do vseh zadevnih podatkov.
To that end, the Commission has made available detailed information on the main measures in the Staff Working Docu‐ ments which accompany new EDP recommendations, including the forecast of key variables for the computation of the fiscal effort under the baseline scenario (e.g. the point of reference to which future forecasts will be compared in order to compute both the top‐down and the bottom‐up approach). 
V ta namen je dala Komisija na voljo podrobne informacije o glavnih ukrepih v delovnih dokumentih služb Komisije, ki so priloženi novim priporočilom v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, vključno z napovedjo ključnih spremenljivk za izračun fiskalnega napora po osnovnem scenariju (npr. referenčna točka, s katero se bodo primerjale prihodnje napovedi za izračun po pristopu od zgoraj navzdol in od spodaj navzgor).
Furthermore, after each forecast round (as of the Commission 2014 spring forecast) the Commission provides Member States with an excel spreadsheet tool with all the relevant input data in order that they can exactly replicate the Commission’s calculations. 
Poleg tega Komisija po vsakem krogu napovedi (od spomladanske napovedi Komisije za leto 2014) državam članicam posreduje orodje z Excelovimi preglednicami z vsemi zadevnimi vhodnimi podatki, da lahko te natančno ponovijo izračune Komisije.
97 The Commission would like to clarify that a bottom‐up quantification of the measures as part of the careful analysis that needs to be undertaken in cases of a shortfall from the recommended budgetary targets, was first proposed in a Commission note on the ‘Assessment of effective action’ to the Alternates of the Economic and Financial Commit‐ tee (the relevant instance of the Council) in December 2012 and since then carried out as a complementary indica‐ tor of the fiscal effort in the careful analysis, notably in the Staff Working Documents accompanying EDP recom‐ mendations or in the budgetary surveillance notes regularly discussed with the Member States. 
97 Komisija želi pojasniti, da je bila količinska opredelitev ukrepov od spodaj navzgor kot del natančne analize, ki jo je treba opraviti, kadar priporočeni proračunski cilji niso doseženi, prvič predlagana v dopisu Komisije o „oceni uspešnih ukrepov“ namestnikom Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora (zadevno telo Sveta) decembra 2012 in se odtlej uporablja kot dopolnilni kazalnik fiskalnega napora pri natančni analizi, zlasti v delovnih dokumentih služb Komisije, priloženih priporočilom v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ali v dopisih o proračunskem nadzoru, o katerih se redno razpravlja z državami članicami.
In the attempt of providing greater transparency on the methodologies used to assessing compliance with EDP recommendations, a note reviewing the methodology and detailing the bottom‐up operationalisation (Review of the methodology for assessing effective action) was first presented on 26 February 2014 at the EFC‐A. The Economic and Financial Com‐ mittee (EFC, the Parent Committee) approved the note on 12 June 2014, which was endorsed by the Ecofin Council on 20 June 2014. 
Dopis o pregledu metodologije in podrobnem opisu uveljavitve od spodaj navzgor (Pregled metodologije za ocenjevanje uspešnih ukrepov) je bil namestnikom Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora prvič predstavljen 26. februarja 2014, in sicer za zagotovitev večje preglednosti metodologij, ki se uporabljajo za ocenjevanje skladnosti s priporočil v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem. Ekonomsko-finančni odbor (EFC, matični odbor) je dopis odobril 12. junija 2014, Svet Ecofin pa ga je potrdil 20. junija 2014.
The Commission found that structural fiscal targets were expected to be met by France, according to the com‐ monly–agreed methodology and decided to put the procedure in abeyance. The reasoning is detailed in the Commission SWD available at http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/pdf/30_edps/ communication_to_the_council/2015‐07‐01_fr_communication_swd_en.pdf 98 The Commission agreed to provide Member States with all the necessary information for them to replicate the computation of the effective action assessment thus including detailed excel spreadsheets providing step‐by‐step calculations of both the top‐down and bottom‐up approach. 
Komisija je v skladu s skupno dogovorjeno metodologijo ugotovila, da bo Francija po pričakovanjih dosegla strukturne fiskalne cilje, in se odločila za mirovanje postopka. Utemeljitev je podrobno navedena v delovnem dokumentu služb Komisije, ki je na voljo na http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC032 6&qid=1458128824853&from=EN. 98 Komisija se je strinjala, da državam članicam zagotavlja vse potrebne informacije, da lahko te ponovijo izračun ocene uspešnih ukrepov, torej vključno s podrobnimi Excelovimi preglednicami, ki predstavljajo postopne izračune za pristop od zgoraj navzdol in od spodaj navzgor.