natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Structural policies, transport, research and energy • Whether Community financing of major projects under the Cohesion Fund was adequately prepared by the Commission and whether the ex post evaluation of major projects generated results that were useful for future decision-making (SR 1/2008). • Whether the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) had achieved its aims of providing a rapid, efficient and flexible response to Member States suffering from natural disasters (SR 3/2008). • Whether the Commission had planned, monitored and evaluated the IEE programme (Intelligent Energy for Europe Programme, designed to promote energy efficiency, the use of renewable energy sources and energy diversification) adequately, and whether the Executive Agency that runs the programme had made positive changes to the management of the programme (SR 7/2008). • Whether ISPA (Instrument for Structural policies for Pre-Accession, one of the instruments assisting candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe in preparation for accession in the period 2000–2006) was adequately prepared and was used following a coherent strategy. The Court furthermore assessed whether ISPA projects had been implemented as planned, were contributing to the beneficiary countries’ compliance with EU environmental standards and improved the Trans-European network (SR 12/2008). 
3/2008). • Ali je Komisija ustrezno načrtovala, spremljala in vrednotila program IEE (program Inteligentna energija za Evropo, namenjen spodbujanju energetske učinkovitosti, uporabi obnovljivih virov energije in energetski diverzifikaciji) in ali je izvajalska agencija, ki je izvajala program, pozitivno vplivala na upravljanje programa (Posebno poročilo št. 7/2008). • Ali je bil instrument ISPA (instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju kot eden od instrumentov za pomoč državam kandidatkam iz srednje in vzhodne Evrope pri pripravah na pristop v obdobju 2000–2006) ustrezno pripravljen in ali je temeljil na skladni strategiji. Sodišče je poleg tega ocenilo, ali so bili projekti ISPA izvedeni po načrtih, ali so prispevali k temu, da bi države upravičenke spoštovale okoljske standarde EU in k izboljšanju vseevropskega omrežja (Posebno poročilo št.
23 External actions • Whether the Commission adequately identified the rehabilitation needs of those affected by the Tsunami and Hurricane Mitch disasters and whether the aid was implemented in a timely and efficient matter (SR 6/2008). • Whether the EU support to new direct EU border neighbours (Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine), following the enlargements of 2004 and 2007, improved their capacity in areas of border control, migration/asylum management, the fight against organised crime, and judiciary and good governance. 
Zunanji ukrepi • Ali je Komisija ustrezno opredelila sanacijske potrebe tistih, ki sta jih prizadela cunami in hurikan Mitch, in ali se je pomoč izvajala pravočasno in učinkovito (Posebno poročilo št. 6/2008). • Ali je podpora EU novim sosedskim državam, ki neposredno mejijo na EU (Belorusija, Moldavija in Ukrajina), po širitvah v letih 2004 in 2007 izboljšala njihove zmogljivosti na področjih mejne kontrole, upravljanja migracij/azila, boja proti organiziranemu kriminalu ter sodstva in odgovornega vodenja.
The Court also assessed the reasons for possible underperformance and to what extent the Commission had a process in place to take into account lessons learned for continued assistance in this field (SR 9/2008). • Whether the EU assistance in contributing to improving health services in Sub-Saharan Africa (in the context of the EC’s commitments to poverty reduction and the Millennium Development Goals (MDG)) had been effective. 
Sodišče je ocenilo tudi razloge za možno premajhno uspešnost in v kolikšni meri je Komisija vzpostavila proces, s katerim bi upoštevala pridobljena spoznanja pri nadaljevanju pomoči na tem področju (Posebno poročilo št. 9/2008). • Ali je pomoč EU uspešno prispevala k izboljšanju zdravstvenih storitev v Podsaharski Afriki (v okviru zavez ES o zmanjšanju revščine in razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja).
The Court assessed whether financial and human resources allocated to the health sector reflected the EC’s policy commitments, whether the Commission had speeded up the implementation of this aid and whether the Commission had used various instruments to assist the health sector in an effective way (SR 10/2008). 
Sodišče je ocenilo, ali so finančni in človeški viri, ki so bili dodeljeni zdravstvenemu sektorju, odražali zaveze politike ES, ali je Komisija pospešila izvajanje te pomoči in ali je uporabljala različne instrumente za uspešno pomoč zdravstvenemu sektorju (Posebno poročilo št. 10/2008).
Revenue, banking activities, administrative expenditure, Community institutions and bodies and internal policies • Whether the management of the Binding Tariff Information, which promotes uniform applications of customs policy and ensures correct duty levies, was effective (adequate and applying legal provisions) (SR 2/2008). • Whether the EU ‘regulatory agencies’ had been able to implement the EU’s major administrative and financial reforms aiming at gearing management towards getting results. 
Prihodki, bančne dejavnosti, upravni odhodki, institucije in organi Skupnosti ter notranje politike • Ali je bilo upravljanje zavezujoče tarifne informacije, ki spodbuja enotno izvajanje carinske politike in zagotavlja pravilno obračunavanje dajatev, uspešno (ustreznost in izvajanje zakonskih določb) (Posebno poročilo št. 2/2008). • Ali so „regulativne agencije“ EU lahko izvajale veliko upravno in finančno reformo EU, katere cilj je bil usmeriti upravljanje k doseganju rezultatov.
The Court considered whether the agencies had planned their activities adequately, introduced sound monitoring tools for these activities and properly reported on their activities and evaluated their results (SR 5/2008). 24 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali so agencije svoje dejavnosti ustrezno načrtovale, uvedle zanesljive instrumente za spremljanje teh dejavnosti ter ustrezno poročale o svojih dejavnostih in ocenjevale svoje rezultate (Posebno poročilo št. 5/2008). 24
25 SPECIAL REPORTS PUBLISHED IN 20086 1/2008 The procedures for the preliminary examination and evaluation of major investment projects for the 1994–1999 and 2000–2006 programming periods (OJ C 81, 1.4.2008) 2/2008 Binding Tariff Information (BTI) (OJ C 103, 24.4.2008) 3/2008 The European Union Solidarity Fund: how rapid, efficient and flexible is it? 
25 POSEBNA POROČILA, OBJAVLJENA V LETU 20086 1/2008 Procesi obravnavanja vlog in vrednotenja v zvezi z velikimi naložbenimi projekti iz programskih obdobij 1994–1999 in 2000–2006 (UL C 81, 1.4.2008) 2/2008 Zavezujoče tarifne informacije (ZTI) (UL C 103, 24.4.2008) 3/2008 Kako hiter, učinkovit in fleksibilen je Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije?
(OJ C 153, 18.6.2008) 4/2008 The implementation of milk quotas in the Member States which joined the European Union on 1 May 2004 (OJ C 185, 22.7.2008) 5/2008 The European Union’s agencies: Getting results 6/2008 The European Commission Rehabilitation Aid following the Tsunami and Hurricane Mitch 7/2008 Intelligent Energy 2003–2006 8/2008 Is cross compliance an effective policy? 
(UL C 153, 18.6.2008) 4/2008 Izvajanje mlečnih kvot v državah članicah, ki so se Evropski uniji pridružile 1. maja 2004 (UL C 185, 22.7.2008) 5/2008 Agencije Evropske unije: doseganje rezultatov 6/2008 Pomoč Evropske komisije za sanacijo po cunamiju in hurikanu Mitch 7/2008 Inteligentna energija 2003–2006 8/2008 Ali je navzkrižna skladnost uspešna politika?
9/2008 The effectiveness of EU support in the area of freedom, security and justice for Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine 10/2008 EC Development Assistance to Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa 11/2008 The management of the European Union support for the public storage operations of cereals 12/2008 The Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-accession (ISPA), 2000–2006 6 Special reports are available from the Court’s website or by filling in an electronic order form on EU Bookshop. 
9/2008 Uspešnost podpore EU na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice v Belorusiji, Moldaviji in Ukrajini 10/2008 Razvojna pomoč ES za zdravstvene storitve v Podsaharski Afriki 11/2008 Upravljanje podpore Evropske unije za dejavnosti javnega skladiščenja žit 12/2008 Instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA), 2000–2006 6 Posebna poročila lahko najdete na spletni strani Sodišča ali jih naročite tako, da izpolnite elektronsko naročilnico na spletni strani EU-Bookshop.
26 OPINIONS PUBLISHED IN 2008 Another contribution by the Court to improving the financial management of EU funds is provided via opinions on proposals or financial management issues. 
MNENJA, OBJAVLJENA V LETU 2008 Sodišče prispeva k izboljševanju finančnega poslovodenja sredstev EU tudi z izdajanjem mnenj o predlogih ali vprašanjih, povezanih s finančnim poslovodenjem.
These opinions are required as part of the process of adopting financial legislation7, or can be delivered at the request of any of the EU institutions8. 
Ta mnenja so zahtevana v okviru sprejemanja finančne zakonodaje7 oziroma jih je mogoče podati na zaprosilo katere od institucij EU8.
The Court’s opinions cover issues relating to specific areas of EU expenditure, e.g. on amending the European Aviation Safety Agency’s Financial Regulation (Opinion No 1/2008), as well as on issues relating to the EU’s revenue, e.g. on amending the regulation on the system of the Communities’ own resources (Opinion No 2/2008). 
Mnenja Sodišča pokrivajo vprašanja, povezana s posebnimi področji odhodkov EU, npr. o spremembi finančne uredbe Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu (Mnenje št. 1/2008) ter vprašanja, povezana s prihodki EU, npr. o spremembi uredbe o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev (Mnenje št. 2/2008).
Opinions draw on the Court’s expertise with respect to EU financial management developed over years of audits; in some cases specific audits or opinions are referred to. 
Osnovana so na strokovnem znanju Sodišča o finančnem poslovodenju EU, ki ga je z leti pridobilo med izvajanjem svojih revizij, v nekaterih primerih pa se sklicujejo na posebne revizije ali mnenja.
For example, in the opinion on a new financial regulation of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor), the Court refers to its 2006 Annual Report, where it had already drawn the attention to high risks associated with legality and regularity of payments related to research grants. 
V mnenju o novi finančni uredbi za Evropsko skupno podjetje za ITER (Mednarodni termonuklearni poskusni reaktor), na primer, se Sodišče sklicuje na svoje Letno poročilo za leto 2006, v katerem je že opozorilo na visoka tveganja, povezana z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo plačil v zvezi z donacijami za raziskave.
7 Article 279 of the EC Treaty. 
26 7 Člen 279 Pogodbe ES.
8 Article 248(4) of the EC Treaty. 
8 Člen 248(4) Pogodbe ES.
27 OPINIONS ADOPTED IN 20089 Opinion No 1/2008 Opinion No 2/2008 Opinion No 3/2008 Opinion No 4/2008 Opinion No 5/2008 on a proposal for a Decision of the Management Board of the European Aviation Safety Agency amending the Agency’s Financial Regulation on a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 implementing Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities’ own resources (OJ C 192, 29.7.2008) of the Court of Auditors of the European Communities on a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 549/69 determining the categories of officials and other servants of the European Communities to whom the provisions of Article 12, the second paragraph of Article 13 and Article 14 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the Communities apply (OJ C 199, 5.8.2008) on the Financial Regulation of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy) on a proposal for a Council Regulation amending the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities (OJ C 8, 13.1.2009) 9 The Court decides whether to publish its opinions publicly on a case-by-case basis, depending on general interest and considerations of confidentiality. 
5/2008 o predlogu sklepa upravnega odbora Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu o spremembi finančne uredbe Agencije o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1150/2000 o izvajanju Sklepa 2000/597/ES, Euratom o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Skupnosti (UL C 192, 29.7.2008) Računskega sodišča Evropskih skupnosti o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (Euratom, ESPJ, EGS) št. 549/69 o določitvi kategorij uradnikov in drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti, za katere se uporabljajo določbe člena 12, drugega odstavka člena 13 in člena 14 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Skupnosti (UL C 199, 5.8.2008) o finančni uredbi za Evropsko skupno podjetje za ITER in razvoj fuzijske energije (fuzija za energijo) o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti (UL C 8, 13.1.2009) 9 Sodišče se glede na splošni interes in vidike zaupnosti za vsak posamezen primer odloči, ali bo mnenje javno objavilo.
FOLLOW-UP AND IMPACT Public auditing is a key component in ensuring accountability, and a useful contribution to public debate. 
NADALJNJE UKREPANJE IN UČINEK Revidiranje javnih financ je ključni sestavni del zagotavljanja odgovornosti in koristen prispevek k javni razpravi.
It also plays a key role in helping modern democracies run efficiently. 
Ključno vlogo ima tudi pri tem, da sodobnim demokracijam pomaga pri učinkovitem delovanju.
Through audit activities the ultimate stakeholders, in this case the citizens of Europe, are being informed about whether their money is being spent in a correct and useful way. 
Prek revizijskih dejavnosti so končne zainteresirane strani, v tem primeru državljani Evrope, obveščeni o tem, ali se njihov denar porablja pravilno in koristno.
The Court’s audits provide information directly to decision-makers in the institutions concerned — in the European context, primarily the Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Member States. 
Revizije Sodišča zagotavljajo informacije neposredno oblikovalcem odločitev v zadevnih institucijah – v evropskem kontekstu predvsem v Komisiji, Parlamentu, Svetu in državah članicah.
They can take action on this information, with or without reference to the Court’s audit conclusions. 
Ti lahko na podlagi teh informacij sprejmejo ukrepe in se pri tem sklicujejo na revizijske zaključke Sodišča ali pa ne.
While the main impact of the Court’s audit is through its published reports and opinions, there is also impact during the audit process. 
Čeprav je glavni učinek revizij Sodišča prek njegovih objavljenih poročil in mnenj, se učinek pojavi tudi med potekom revizijskega procesa.
In particular, all audits involve the presentation of detailed findings, sent to the auditee to confirm the veracity of the Court’s observations. 
Del vseh revizij je namreč predstavitev podrobnih ugotovitev, ki se pošlje revidirancu, da potrdi resničnost opažanj Sodišča.
The auditee’s — mainly the Commission — replies are published together with the reports. 
Odgovori revidiranca – največkrat Komisije – se objavijo skupaj s poročili.
In many of these replies the auditee recognises the problems identified by the Court and sets out steps that it intends to take to address them. 
Revidiranec v teh odgovorih pripozna težave, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, in navede ukrepe, ki jih namerava sprejeti za odpravljanje teh težav.
Once the auditing work is finished and a report has been published it is analysed and used by the Parliament and Council, in exercising their political oversight over the use of the budget. 
Ko je revizijsko delo opravljeno in je objavljeno poročilo, ga Parlament in Svet analizirata in uporabita pri izvajanju svojega političnega nadzora nad porabo proračuna.
The Court’s reports provide a basis for the Council’s recommendation and Parliament’s decision on the annual discharge of the budget. 
Letna poročila Sodišča zagotavljajo podlago za priporočilo Sveta in odločitev Parlamenta o letni razrešnici za proračun.
Examples of the impact of the Court’s work can be found in actions taken by the Commission as a result of the discharge resolution on the 2006 Budget (mainly impact in 2008): • In the area of Agricultural expenditure: the adoption of new guidelines for certification bodies that are being applied for 2007 and onwards. • In the area of Cohesion: the simplification of rules and eligibility criteria for the 2007–2013 period (flat rates for overheads, establishment of eligibility rules at national levels, ...). • In the area of External Actions: the adoption of new joint (EC–UN) visibility guidelines in 2008, with the development of common terms of reference for verifications; the improvement by the Commission of the functionalities of a common information system for projects; the adoption of standard terms of reference for expenditure verifications for grants and fee based service contracts of external action expenditure at the level of project implementing organisations. • In the area of Internal Policies: the improvement of information available to beneficiaries through a specific website (CORDIS); the adoption of an Audit Strategy for 2007–2013 (Commission) in order to correct errors not detected during desk-reviews; simplification of cost eligibility (personnel and indirect costs). 
Primere učinka dela Sodišča je mogoče najti v ukrepih, ki jih je Komisija uvedla po resoluciji o razrešnici za proračun za leto 2006 (učinek v glavnem v letu 2008): • Na področju kmetijskih odhodkov: sprejetje novih smernic za certifikacijske organe, ki se uporabljajo od leta 2007. • Na področju kohezije: poenostavitev pravil in meril za upravičenost za obdobje 2007–2013 (pavšalne stopnje za režijske stroške, določitev pravil za upravičenost na nacionalnih ravneh ...) • Na področju zunanjih ukrepov: sprejetje novih skupnih (ES – ZN) smernic o razpoznavnosti leta 2008 z razvojem obsega skupnih nalog in pristojnosti za preverjanja; izboljšava, ki jo je Komisija uvedla v zvezi s funkcionalnostmi skupnega informacijskega sistema za projekte, sprejetje standardnega obsega in nalog za preverjanje odhodkov pri donacijah in na pristojbinah temelječih pogodbah o storitvah za odhodke pri zunanjih ukrepih, na ravni organizacij, ki izvajajo projekte. • Na področju notranjih politik: izboljšanje informacij, ki so na voljo upravičencem prek posebne spletne strani (CORDIS); sprejetje revizijske strategije za obdobje 2007–2013 (Komisija), da se odpravijo napake, ki niso bile odkrite med pregledi dokumentacije; poenostavitev upravičenosti stroškov (stroški dela in posredni stroški).
Source: Report from the Commission to the EP and Council on the follow-up of discharge 2006. 
Vir: Poročilo Komisije EP in Svetu o nadaljnjem ukrepanju v zvezi z razrešnico za leto 2006.
29 Special reports are also taken into consideration during the discharge procedure. 
V postopku razrešnice se upoštevajo tudi posebna poročila.
The impact of audit reports can be increased if they are taken up by the relevant media, stimulating wider attention and debate. 
Učinek revizijskih poročil se lahko poveča, če o njih poročajo sredstva javnega obveščanja, kar spodbudi širšo pozornost in razpravo.
The Court’s Annual Report will usually get significant media coverage, but several of its special reports have also been followed with interest by the press. 
Letno poročilo Sodišča je običajno deležno velike medijske pozornosti, vendar je tisk z zanimanjem spremljal tudi več njegovih posebnih poročil.
One example of this was the report on cross compliance (SR 8/2008) which was published in the period of the adoption of the health check of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). 
Eden od takšnih primerov je bilo poročilo o navzkrižni skladnosti (Posebno poročilo št. 8/2008), ki je bilo objavljeno v času sprejetja pregleda skupne kmetijske politike (SKP).
Due to the importance of cross compliance and its central role in the CAP and due to the timing of the publication, it received wide coverage in many different types of media: television, newspapers, specialised press, internet publications (press, agricultural organisations, MEP websites, internet blogs, etc.). 
Zaradi pomembnosti navzkrižne skladnosti in njene osrednje vloge v SKP ter zaradi časa objave, ga je obširno pokrivalo veliko različnih vrst medijev: televizija, časopisi, specializiran tisk, spletne objave (tisk, kmetijske organizacije, spletne strani poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, spletni blogi itd).
Indeed, it was intensively discussed in the European Parliament, which has included almost all of the Court’s recommendations in its draft discharge report. 
O njem so intenzivno razpravljali tudi v Evropskem parlamentu, ki je skoraj vsa priporočila Sodišča vključil v svoj osnutek poročila o razrešnici.
Follow-up information on the Court’s previous observations is given in the respective chapters of the Court’s Annual Report. 
Informacije o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi prejšnjih opažanj Sodišča so podane v posameznih poglavjih letnega poročila Sodišča.
The most common observation made by the Court in its latest Annual Report (2007) is that while some action has been taken the weaknesses previously identified remain at least partly unresolved. 
Sodišče v svojem zadnjem letnem poročilu (2007) najpogosteje opaža, da so bili sicer sprejeti nekateri ukrepi, vendar predhodno ugotovljene slabosti ostajajo vsaj delno nerazrešene.
The Court is currently developing its analysis of the impact of its work — both audits and opinions — over longer periods of time. 
Sodišče trenutno razvija svojo analizo učinka svojega dela – tako v zvezi z revizijami kot mnenji – v daljših časovnih obdobjih.
As an example of this, the Court uses a Commission database on its follow-up of audit recommendations as a base for assessing the impact of its audits. 
Sodišče na primer pri oceni učinka svojih revizij uporablja Komisijino podatkovno zbirko o njenem nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi revizijskih priporočil.
The assessment might lead to audit work consisting of separate in-depth audit tasks, leading to further findings and recommendations. 
Ocena bi lahko privedla do revizijskega dela, ki bi ga sestavljale ločene poglobljene revizijske naloge, ki bi privedle do nadaljnjih ugotovitev in priporočil.
These can be included in either a subsequent special report covering the audit area, or a report on the follow-up and impact of recommendations on financial management. 
Te bi lahko bile del poznejših posebnih poročil, ki bi pokrivala dano revizijsko področje, ali poročil o nadaljnjem ukrepanju in učinku priporočil na finančno poslovodenje.
THE COURT’S VIEW THE CONCEPT OF TOLERABLE RISK OF ERROR Within the context of developing a Community internal control framework, the Court indicated in its Opinion No 2/2004 that it is for the Union’s political institutions to take a decision on the level of risk which they are prepared to tolerate when approving EU spending policies. 
STALIŠČE SODIŠČA KONCEPT DOPUSTNEGA TVEGANJA NAPAKE V kontekstu razvijanja okvira notranje kontrole Skupnosti je Sodišče v svojem Mnenju št. 2/2004 navedlo, da je naloga političnih institucij Unije, da sprejmejo odločitev o stopnji tveganja, ki so ga pripravljene dopustiti pri odobravanju politik porabe EU.
The Court suggested that the Parliament and Council should reach agreement on the trade-off between the costs and benefits of controls, in other words, on a tolerable risk of residual errors in expenditure. 
Sodišče je predlagalo, da se Svet in Parlament dogovorita o kompromisu med stroški in koristmi kontrol, ali drugače povedano, o dopustnem tveganju preostalih napak pri odhodkih.
The cost of controls should be in proportion to the benefits that they bring in both monetary and political terms. 
Stroški kontrol bi morali biti sorazmerni s koristmi, ki jih prinašajo, tako z monetarnega kot političnega vidika.