natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The reports are also sent to the Council, for its consideration in the context of the discharge procedure and, on occasion, through presentations to Council working parties. 
Poročila so poslana tudi Svetu za preudarek v okviru postopka razrešnice in občasno v predstavitev delovnim skupinam Sveta.
Our annual activity report (which contains details of our special reports) is also sent to the parliament of each Member State, and individual Members of the Court may bring particular reports to the special attention of a national parliament or its relevant committee, in the course of their interaction with the parliament concerned. 
Naše letno poročilo o dejavnostih (ki vsebuje podrobnosti naših posebnih poročil) se pošlje tudi parlamentu vsake države članice. Posamezni člani Sodišča lahko na nekatera poročila posebej opozorijo nacionalni parlament ali njegov ustrezni odbor v okviru svoje interakcije z zadevnim parlamentom.
Our recommendations are also disseminated to Member States through the medium of Commission guidelines and training interventions. 
Naša priporočila se v državah članicah razširjajo tudi s smernicami in usposabljanji Komisije.
(67) Reports are selected on the basis that they have not yet been followed up, are still relevant, and that a minimum two years have elapsed since the publication of the special report. 
(67) Podlaga za izbor poročil je, da zanje še ni bilo opravljeno spremljanje izvajanja priporočil, da so še vedno relevantna in da sta od objave posebnega poročila minili vsaj dve leti.
(68) In addition to the recommendations in the Court’s reports, the Member States who are examined as part of the sample for individual performance audits also receive from the Court a dedicated unpublished report on what we found. 
(68) Poleg priporočil iz poročil Sodišča dobijo države članice, ki so preučene kot del vzorca za posamezne revizije smotrnosti poslovanja, od Sodišča tudi neobjavljeno namensko poročilo o naših ugotovitvah.
These reports are not considered here. 
Ta poročila tu niso upoštevana.
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal of the European Union C 375/115 Figure 3.7 — Communication of findings to Member States Source: European Court of Auditors. 
SL 13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/115 Slika 3.7 – Sporočanje ugotovitev državam članicam Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 3.83. However, to date we have had relatively little information on the impact of these communication efforts in the Member States. 
UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA 3.83 Za zdaj pa smo dobili le razmeroma malo informacij o učinku teh prizadevanj za sporočanje državam članicam.
To remedy this, we conducted a survey of paying agencies, ministries and SAIs at Member State national level on the follow up of recommendations (69). 
Da bi to izboljšali, smo izvedli anketo med plačilnimi agencijami, ministrstvi in VRI na nacionalni ravni držav članic o izvajanju na podlagi priporočil(69).
(69) A survey sample of 76 was identified and final responses were received from 56, a response rate of 74 %. 
(69) Anketni vzorec je bil opredeljen na 76, končni odgovori pa so bili prejeti od 56, torej je bila stopnja odziva 74-odstotna.
EN C 375/116 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 3.84. This confirmed that communication of recommendations does indeed get through to Member State level with the survey providing evidence of receipt of our messages through one or more of the above channels. 
C 375/116 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA 3.84 Anketa je potrdila, da so priporočila, ki jih sporočimo, na ravni držav članic znana, saj je zagotovila dokaze o prejemu naših sporočil po enem ali več navedenih kanalih.
In terms of impact, 80 % of respondents acknowledged at least ‘some awareness’ of our reports at Member State level. 
Kar zadeva učinek, je 80 % anketirancev potrdilo, da na ravni države članice obstaja vsaj nekolikšno poznavanje naših poročil.
However, only 13 % responded that there was a co-ordinated follow-up process for all of our recommendations in their Member State. 
Le 13 % pa je odgovorilo, da v njihovi državi članici poteka usklajen proces izvajanja vseh naših priporočil.
As regards follow-up action taken, 38 % suggested that action only takes place for particular topics, while 49 % indicated that no formal follow-up action takes place. 
Glede uvedenega izvajanja priporočil je 38% menilo, da so ukrepi izvedeni samo za nekatere teme, 49% pa jih je navedlo, da ni nobenega formalnega izvajanja naših priporočil.
Nevertheless, some Member States provided concrete examples of embedding our recommendations in national policy and practice, mainly in the field of natural resources (see Figure 3.8). 
Vseeno pa so nekatere države članice navedle konkretne primere umeščanja naših priporočil v nacionalno politiko in prakso, zlasti na področju naravnih virov (glej sliko 3.8).
Figure 3.8 — Examples of awareness and communication at Member State level Our report on ‘The cost-effectiveness of EU Rural Development support for non-productive investments in agriculture’ (70) recommended that Member States should put in place procedures to ensure that the costs of the supported non-productive investments do not exceed the costs of similar types of goods, service or works offered by the market. 
Slika 3.8 – Primeri poznavanja in sporočanja na ravni države članice Naše poročilo Stroškovna učinkovitost podpore EU za razvoj podeželja za neproduktivne naložbe v kmetijstvu(70) je priporočilo, naj države članice uvedejo postopke za zagotavljanje, da stroški podprtih neproduktivnih naložb ne presegajo stroškov podobnih vrst blaga, storitev ali del, ki jih ponuja trg.
More concretely, Member States should define appropriate benchmarks and/or reference costs against which the costs of non-productive investments are systematically verified as part of their administrative checks. 
Natančneje, države članice bi morale določiti ustrezne referenčne vrednosti in/ali referenčne stroške, na podlagi katerih bi se stroški neproduktivnih naložb sistematično preverjali kot del njihovih administrativnih pregledov.
Responding to this recommendation, one Member State has introduced standard prices for the management of planting of hedges. 
V odziv na to priporočilo je ena država članica uvedla standardne cene za upravljanje zasaditev žive meje.
For disseminating the Court's recommendations, a managing authority in one Member State makes the Court's findings available on its rural development programme implementation committee intranet where all the implementing bodies and the paying agency are represented. 
Organ upravljanja v eni od držav članic priporočila Sodišča razširja tako, da daje njegove ugotovitve na voljo na svojem internem spletišču odbora za izvajanje programa razvoja podeželja, na katerem so zastopani vsi izvajalski organi in plačilna agencija.
In one Member State, the Ministry of Agriculture notifies the paying agency and, where necessary, other stakeholders by means of a summary report with our key findings and recommendations, with the full report in an annex. 
V eni državi članici ministrstvo za kmetijstvo obvesti plačilno agencijo in po potrebi druge deležnike s povzetkom naših ključnih ugotovitev in priporočil, v prilogi pa doda celotno poročilo.
Source: Select survey responses from our survey of SAIs and paying agencies. 
Vir: izbrani odzivi na našo anketo VRI in plačilnih agencij.
(70) Special report No 20/2015, ‘The cost-effectiveness of EU Rural Development support for non-productive investments in agriculture’ (http://eca.europa.eu). 
(70) Posebno poročilo št. 20/2015 – Stroškovna učinkovitost podpore EU za razvoj podeželja za neproduktivne naložbe v kmetijstvu (http://eca.europa.eu).
However, there is a wide variation in the level of formal follow-up and only moderate evidence of changes in national policy and practice as a result of our recommendations. 
Toda stopnja formalnega izvajanja naših priporočil je zelo različna in dokazi o spremembah v nacionalni politiki in praksi, ki bi nastale zaradi naših priporočil, so skromni.
It is clear that there is scope for improvement in how we develop and distribute our recommendations for maximum impact at Member State level. 
Jasno je, da je mogoče izboljšati to, kako razvijamo in razširjamo svoja priporočila, da bo učinek na ravni držav članic čim večji.
In the autumn of 2016, the Court will engage the Contact Committee, Commission services and the Council in the consultation on possible follow-up of recommendations in Member States. 
Jeseni 2016 bo Sodišče začelo posvetovanje z Odborom za stike, službami Komisije in Svetom o morebitnem spremljanju izvajanja priporočil v državah članicah.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions 3.86. Horizon 2020 is an ambitious, wide-ranging programme, bringing previously separate research and innovation programmes together for the first time, and incorporating a focus on ‘Societal challenges’. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA Zaključki 3.86 Obzorje 2020 je ambiciozen in daljnosežen program, ki prvič združuje prej ločene programe za raziskave in inovacije ter vključuje osredotočenost na družbene izzive.
There are high-level links between Horizon 2020 and the EU’s main strategy, Europe 2020: two of the three main indicators for Horizon 2020 are also high-level indicators for Europe 2020. 
Med Obzorjem 2020 in glavno strategijo EU Evropa 2020 obstajajo povezave na visoki ravni: dva od treh glavnih kazalnikov za Obzorje 2020 sta tudi kazalnika na visoki ravni za Evropo 2020.
These indicators, however, are of limited use in tracking the contribution of Horizon 2020 to Europe 2020 (see paragraphs 3.7 to 3.17). 
Vendar pa je uporabnost teh kazalnikov pri sledenju prispevku Obzorja 2020 k Evropi 2020 omejena (glej odstavke 3.7 do 3.17).
3.87. The links between the Commission’s 10 political priorities and Europe 2020/Horizon 2020 need further clarification. 
3.87 Povezave med desetimi političnimi prednostnimi nalogami Komisije in Evropo 2020/Obzorjem 2020 je treba dodatno razjasniti.
The political priorities overlap with, but are different from, the Europe 2020 priorities. 
Politične prednostne naloge se prekrivajo s prednostnimi nalogami Evrope 2020, vendar se od njih razlikujejo.
It is not clear to which set of priorities Horizon 2020 — in its planning right through to its monitoring and reporting — is now to be aligned. 
Ni jasno, s katerim sklopom prednostnih nalog bo, od načrtovanja in vse do spremljanja in poročanja, usklajeno Obzorje 2020.
There is a risk that other areas of EU activity are concerned (see paragraphs 3.18 to 3.21). of the European Union THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES C 375/117 While the Commission accepts that it needs to improve further, it considers that its performance framework already tracks the contribution of Horizon 2020 to Europe 2020. 
Obstaja tveganje, da se to nanaša tudi na druga področja dejavnosti EU (glej odstavke 3.18 do 3.21).
As explained under Figure 3.1 and in paragraph 3.13: The EU budget represents only a small part of total research and innovation spending in Europe, and so in itself can make only a minor contribution towards the achievement of the Europe 2020 objectives. 
Kot je pojasnjeno v odgovoru na sliko 3.1 in odstavek 3.13: Proračun EU je le majhen del skupne porabe za raziskave in inovacije v Evropi in tako lahko sam po sebi le malo prispeva k doseganju ciljev Evrope 2020.
Progress towards the Europe 2020 strategy depends on a wide range of actions at EU and national level, which are not only on spending, and for which Member States have a primordial role to play. 
Napredek pri uresničevanju strategije Evropa 2020 je odvisen od najrazličnejših ukrepov na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni, ki pa ne temeljijo le na porabi in pri katerih imajo države članice glavno vlogo.
The political priorities of the Juncker Commission provide the framework for the Commission’s own contribution to the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy, which is a shared responsibility of the Union and the Member States. 
3.87 Politične prednostne naloge Junckerjeve Komisije zagotavljajo okvir za prispevek Komisije k izvajanju strategije Evropa 2020, odgovornosti, ki si jo delijo Unija in države članice.
The political priorities guide the Commission’s implementation of financial programmes but this is done in full complementarity with the Europe 2020 strategy and in accordance with the legal framework underpinning Horizon 2020, which has not changed. 
Politične prednostne naloge vodijo Komisijo pri izvajanju finančnih programov, kar poteka v popolnem dopolnjevanju s strategijo Evropa 2020 in v skladu s pravnim okvirom, na katerem temelji Obzorje 2020 in ki ni bil spremenjen. 3.86
EN C 375/118 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 3.88. A key success factor for Horizon 2020 is effective synergy and complementarity between national and European research and innovation programmes. 
C 375/118 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 3.88 Ključna dejavnika uspeha za Obzorje 2020 sta uspešna sinergija in dopolnjevanje med nacionalnimi in evropskimi programi za raziskave in inovacije.
Our partners in the supreme audit institutions of Bulgaria and Portugal found that while there were areas of complementarity in their countries, there were also some problems at the national level (see paragraphs 3.22 and 3.23). 
Naši partnerji v vrhovnih revizijskih institucijah Bolgarije in Portugalske so ugotovili, da v njihovih državah obstajajo področja dopolnjevanja, vendar pa je na nacionalni ravni tudi nekaj težav (glej odstavka 3.22 in 3.23).
3.89. The legal framework of Horizon 2020 introduces several important elements for performance management such as objectives and key performance indicators. 
3.89 Pravni okvir Obzorja 2020 uvaja več pomembnih elementov za upravljanje smotrnosti poslovanja, kot so cilji in ključni kazalniki smotrnosti poslovanja.
This is a welcome development. However, further developments to the framework are still needed; some baselines, milestones and targets still need to be developed, some targets should be reviewed to ensure that they are suitably ambitious; some indicators suffer from lack of available information. 
To je dobrodošel razvoj dogodkov, toda še vedno je treba nadalje razvijati okvir ter razviti nekatera izhodišča, mejnike in cilje, nekatere cilje je treba pregledati, da se zagotovi, da so dovolj ambiciozni, v zvezi z nekaterimi kazalniki pa ni na voljo dovolj informacij.
The objectives defined by the legislation are themselves naturally at a high-level, but are not translated, through work programmes and calls, into lower level objectives useful for operational performance management purposes. 
Cilji, opredeljeni v zakonodaji, so seveda na visoki ravni, vendar v programih dela in razpisih niso pretvorjeni v cilje na nižji ravni, ki bi bili uporabni za operativno upravljanje smotrnosti poslovanja.
The Commission does not use the Horizon 2020 work programmes and associated calls to increase the focus on performance (see paragraphs 3.27 to 3.38). 3.90. 
Komisija ne uporablja programov dela v okviru Obzorja 2020 in s tem povezanih razpisov za to, da bi povečala osredotočenost na smotrnost poslovanja (glej odstavke 3.27 do 3.38).
For the proposals and grant agreements we examined, objectives were generally SMART when it was required by the Commission. 
3.90 V predlogih in sporazumih o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev, ki smo jih preučili, so bili cilji običajno SMART, ko je tako zahtevala Komisija.
The evaluation process of these proposals, with the exception of ERC that uses excellence as a criterion, had an emphasis on performance. 
Z izjemo Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta, ki kot merilo uporablja odličnost, je bil poudarek procesa vrednotenja teh predlogov na smotrnosti poslovanja.
Grant agreements require beneficiaries to report to the Commission information for the aggregation of the Horizon 2020 KPIs. 
Sporazumi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev zahtevajo, da upravičenci Komisiji sporočijo informacije za združitev ključnih kazalnikov smotrnosti poslovanja Obzorja 2020.
However the use of the wider concept of expected impact rather than expected result increases the risk that information provided for this part is too broad and not directly attributable to the action funded by Horizon 2020, with the result that performance assessment could be difficult (see paragraphs 3.39 to 3.43). of the European Union THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 3.89. 
Toda raba širšega pojma pričakovanega učinka namesto pričakovanega rezultata povečuje tveganje, da so informacije, zagotovljene za ta del, presplošne in jih ni mogoče neposredno pripisati ukrepu, financiranemu iz Obzorja 2020. Posledično bi bilo lahko ocenjevanje smotrnosti težavno (glej odstavke 3.39 do 3.43).
The results and impacts of work programmes, and of Horizon 2020 more generally, will be assessed using this performance framework. 
Rezultati in učinki delovnih programov, kot tudi Obzorja 2020 na splošno, bodo ocenjeni z uporabo tega okvira smotrnosti poslovanja.
The long-term nature of research, the timescale of the preparation of the legislation, and the limitations in the availability of some data do provide challenges in the completion of the performance framework, and the Commission accepts that continual improvements are necessary. 
Dolgoročna narava raziskav, časovni okvir za pripravo zakonodaje in omejitve razpoložljivosti nekaterih podatkov so izzivi pri dokončanju okvira smotrnosti poslovanja in Komisija se zaveda, da so potrebne nenehne izboljšave.
3.90. The use of ‘expected impact’ rather than ‘result’ arises from the fact that the Horizon 2020 legislation predates the better regulation guidelines. 
3.90 Uporaba izraza „pričakovani učinek“ namesto „rezultat“ izhaja iz dejstva, da je bila zakonodaja za Obzorje 2020 sprejeta pred Smernicami za boljše pravno urejanje.
The Commission wants to evaluate the expected impact of projects when considering which projects to support. 
Komisija želi oceniti pričakovani učinek projektov, ko presoja, katere projekte bo podprla.
This will not affect the monitoring of the indicators that have been set out in the legislation, and which are the cornerstone of the performance framework. 
To ne bo vplivalo na spremljanje kazalnikov, ki so bili opredeljeni v zakonodaji in ki so temelj okvira smotrnosti poslovanja.
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 3.91. Weaknesses in the design of the monitoring and reporting system for Horizon 2020 mean that the Commission is limited in its ability to monitor and report on the performance of the programme: of the European Union C 375/119 THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 3.91. 
13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/119 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA 3.91 Slabosti v zasnovi sistema spremljanja in poročanja za Obzorje 2020 pomenijo, da ima Komisija le omejeno zmožnost spremljanja smotrnosti poslovanja in poročanja o njej: (a) sedanja ureditev Komisiji ne omogoča, da bi ločeno spremljala porabo in smotrnost različnih komponent raziskav in razvoja ter inovacij v okviru Obzorja 2020 in o njiju ločeno poročala (glej odstavke 3.45 do 3.47); (b) prispevek Obzorja 2020 k Evropi 2020 je v proračunskem procesu dobro opredeljen, vendar se o prispevku Obzorja 2020 k Evropi 2020 za zdaj še ni smiselno poročalo (glej odstavke 3.48 do 3.50); (c) sistem spremljanja in poročanja za Obzorje 2020 se je v primerjavi s 7. okvirnim programom izboljšal, vendar so pri informacijah, zbranih za Obzorje 2020, še vedno prisotne slabosti.
The Commission considers that the Horizon 2020 monitoring and reporting system is a great improvement compared to FP7. 
3.91 Komisija meni, da je sistem za spremljanje Obzorja 2020 in poročanje o njem velik napredek v primerjavi s 7. okvirnim programom.
Clear objectives have been established, and a performance framework, discussed fully with stakeholders and the legislative authority, has been anchored in the legal basis. 
Vzpostavljeni so jasni cilji, okvir smotrnosti poslovanja, o katerem se je v celoti razpravljalo z zainteresiranimi stranmi in zakonodajnim organom, pa je utemeljen v pravni podlagi.
There is a risk that difficulties encountered in the ex post evaluation of FP 7 might persist for Horizon 2020 (see paragraphs 3.51 to 3.53). the Commission does not consider that research and innovation spending needs to be reported on separately, this is not required by the legislation and runs counter to the efforts made in Horizon 2020 to close the gap between research and innovation; the legislation requires the contribution of Horizon 2020 to Europe 2020 to be reported on in the interim evaluation of the programme, and this evaluation will be undertaken in 2017. 
Komisija se zaveda, da določene slabosti ostajajo, in si prizadeva, da bi jih odpravila: (a) Komisija ni mnenja, da bi bilo treba o porabi za raziskave in inovacije poročati posebej, saj tega zakonodaja ne zahteva in bi bilo v nasprotju s prizadevanji v okviru Obzorja 2020 za zmanjšanje vrzeli med raziskavami in inovacijami; (b) zakonodaja zahteva, da se o prispevkih Obzorja 2020 k Evropi 2020 poroča med vmesnim vrednotenjem programa, ki bo izvedeno v letu 2017.
The nature of the research cycle means that a certain time must elapse before the contribution to Europe 2020 can be reported on in a meaningful way; the Commission agrees that the Horizon 2020 monitoring and reporting system has improved compared to FP7. 
Narava raziskovalnega cikla pomeni, da mora preteči nekaj časa, preden se lahko na smiseln način poroča o prispevku k Evropi 2020; (c) Komisija se strinja, da je sistem za spremljanje Obzorja 2020 in poročanje o njem velik napredek v primerjavi s 7. okvirnim programom.
Clear objectives have been established, and a performance framework, discussed fully with stakeholders and the legislative authority, has been anchored in the legal basis. 3.92. 
Vzpostavljeni so jasni cilji, okvir smotrnosti poslovanja, o katerem se je v celoti razpravljalo z zainteresiranimi stranmi in zakonodajnim organom, pa je utemeljen v pravni podlagi.
It considers that it has acted to mitigate the difficulties identified in the FP7 evaluation system. 3.92. 
Komisija meni, da je ukrepala za zmanjšanje težav, ki so bile ugotovljene v sistemu vrednotenja 7. okvirnega programa.
The adoption of the Horizon 2020 Regulations (December 2013) preceded the better regulation guidelines (May 2015). 
3.92 Uredbe o Obzorju 2020 (iz decembra 2013) so bile sprejete pred Smernicami za boljše pravno urejanje (iz maja 2015).
Since the adoption of the better regulation guidance, the better regulation terminology is consistently used in the monitoring and evaluation of the performance of Horizon 2020. 
Od sprejetja Smernic za boljše pravno urejanje se terminologija boljšega pravnega urejanja dosledno uporablja pri spremljanju in vrednotenju smotrnosti poslovanja Obzorja 2020.
EN C 375/120 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 3.93. For the natural resources family of DGs, we noted that many of the objectives used in MPs and AARs were taken directly from policy or legislative documents and were therefore at too high a level for management purposes. 
C 375/120 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA 3.93 Za skupino generalnih direktoratov za naravne vire smo ugotovili, da je bilo veliko ciljev v načrtih upravljanja in letnih poročilih o dejavnostih prevzetih neposredno iz dokumentov o politikah ali zakonodajnih dokumentov, zato so bili na previsoki ravni za namene upravljanja.
We observed progress for the indicators used to measure performance but some shortcomings remain (see paragraphs 3.60 to 3.65). of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 3.93. 
Pri kazalnikih za merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja smo ugotovili napredek, toda nekatere pomanjkljivosti ostajajo (glej odstavke 3.60 do 3.65).
Since the Court’s observation in relation to the management plans for 2015, the Commission has introduced changes to the SPP cycle notably to provide a clearer framework for the Commission’s accountability and for its services. 
3.93 Od opažanja Sodišča glede načrtov upravljanja za leto 2015 je Komisija v cikel strateškega načrtovanja in oblikovanja programov uvedla spremembe, zlasti za določitev bolj jasnega okvira za odgovornost Komisije in njenih služb.