natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Certifying Authorities carry out additional checks prior to submitting payment claims to the Commission. 4.8. 
Organi za potrjevanje opravijo dodatne preglede, preden Komisiji predlo­ žijo zahtevke za plačilo.
Forthe2007-2013programmingperiod,auditand control provisions have been strengthened (3). 
4.8 Določbe o revidiranju in kontroliranju so bile za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 okrepljene (3).
The Member States are required to submit for acceptance to the Commission a report and an opinion for each OP. 
Države članice morajo za vsak operativni program Komisiji v odobritev pred­ ložiti poročilo in mnenje.
The report must explain whether management and control systems comply with the relevant regulations (‘compliance assessment report’). 
V poročilu morajo pojasniti, ali so upravljavski in kontrolni sistemi skladni z relevantnimi pred­ pisi („poročilo o oceni skladnosti“).
The Audit Authority has to submit an audit strategy within nine months of the approval of the programme. 
Revizijski organ mora pred­ ložiti revizijsko strategijo v devetih mesecih od odobritve programa.
In addition the Audit Authority is responsible for providing reasonable assurance on the effective functioning of the management and control systems of the programme, and as a consequence on the regularity of the expenditure certified (4), to the Commission through annual control reports (5) and annual opinions. 4.9. 
Poleg tega je revizijski organ odgovoren za podajo razumnega zagotovila o uspešnem delovanju upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov programa ter posledično tudi o pravilnosti potrjenih odhodkov (4), kar stori tako, da Komisiji predloži letna poročila o kontroli (5) in letna mnenja.
MemberStatesalsobeartheprimaryresponsibilityfor correcting the irregular expenditure they detect, and reporting on this to the Commission. 
4.9 Države članice so primarno odgovorne za popravljanje nepravilnih odhodkov, ki jih odkrijejo, in morajo o tem poročati Komisiji.
Member States must take action to recover or withdraw the undue payments made to beneficiaries of Cohesion spending. _____________ (3) See Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 
Sprejeti morajo ukrepe za izterjavo ali umik neupravičenih plačil upravičencem do kohezijske porabe. _____________ (3) Glej Uredbo Sveta (ES) št.
25) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 (OJ L 371, 27.12.2006, p. 1). 
1828/2006 (UL L 371, 27.12.2006, str. 1).
(4) See in particular Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
(4) Glej zlasti člen 62 Uredbe (ES) št.
(5) The 2009 annual control report (which had to be submitted by the end of 2009) covers the results of the audits carried out during the period July 2008 to June 2009. 
(5) Letno poročilo o kontroli za leto 2009 (ki ga je bilo treba predložiti do konca leta 2009) vsebuje rezultate revizij, izvedenih v obdobju od julija 2008 do junija 2009.
It comprises system audits performed and audit of operations covering the expenditure declared to the Commission during the period January 2007 to December 2008. 
V njem so opisane izvedene revizije sistemov in revizija poslovanja, ki zajema odhodke, prijavljene Komisiji v obdobju od januarja 2007 do decembra 2008.
If Commission audits find that Member States have failed to correct irregular expenditure or there are serious failings in the management and control systems, it interrupts and/or suspends payments to the Member State concerned (6). 
Če pri revizijah ugotovi, da države članice niso popravile nepra­ vilnih odhodkov ali da so v upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemih hujše pomanjkljivosti, prekine in začasno ustavi plačila zadevni državi članici (6).
If the Member State does not recover or withdraw the irregular expenditure (i.e. replace the excluded expenditure with other eligible expenditure) or remedy the detected system failures, the Commission may apply financial corrections, reducing EU funding accordingly. Specific risks to regularity 4.11. 
Če država članica ne izterja ali umakne nepravilnih odhodkov (tj. če izključenih odhodkov ne nadomesti z drugimi, upravičenimi odhodki) ali če ne popravi napak, ki so bile odkrite v sistemih, lahko Komisija izvede finančne popravke, s katerimi ustrezno zmanjša financi­ ranje iz EU.
TheregulatoryframeworkofCohesioniscomplex, requiring conformity with a variety of EU policies and rules, such as those relating to public procurement and State aid, as well as requirements specific to Cohesion spending. 4.12. 
Posebna tveganja za pravilnost 4.11 Zakohezijoseuporabljazapletenureditveniokvir,ki mora biti skladen z različnimi politikami in pravili EU, npr. na področju javnih naročil in državne pomoči, ter posebnimi zahtevami za kohezijsko porabo.
Thereisalargenumberofauthoritiesresponsiblefor the implementation of Cohesion policy in Member States (national authorities, regional authorities, intermediate bodies) and an even larger number of beneficiaries and recipients of Community support. 
4.12 Organov,odgovornihzaizvajanjekohezijskepolitike v državah članicah (nacionalni in regionalni organi, posred­ niška telesa) je veliko, še več pa je upravičencev in prejemnikov podpore Skupnosti.
The actors involved in implementing OPs and projects at national or regional level may be either unaware of the applicable rules or unsure about their correct interpretation. 
Udeleženci pri izvajanju operativnih programov in projektov na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni morda ne poznajo veljavnih pravil ali ne vedo, kako se pravilno uporabljajo.
This can lead them to make incorrect or unjus­ tified declarations. 
Zato se lahko zgodi, da predložijo nepra­ vilne ali neupravičene izjave o odhodkih.
4.13. PaymentsfromanOPtobeneficiariesforexpenditure incurred during the eligibility period usually continue beyond the programming period, until all projects are finalised and the programme is closed down. 
4.13 Pri operativnih programih se plačila upravičencem za odhodke, nastale v obdobju upravičenosti, običajno nadaljujejo še po izteku programskega obdobja, dokler niso končani vsi projekti in je program zaključen.
As the eligibility period for 2000-2006 came to an end in 2009, national authorities may have been under pressure to absorb the EU funds committed. 
Ker se je obdobje upraviče­ nosti za obdobje 2000–2006 leta 2009 izteklo, so lahko bili nacionalni organi pod pritiskom, da izčrpajo sredstva EU, za katera so bile prevzete proračunske obveznosti.
As already stated by the Court in its 2008 Annual Report, this increases the risk that ineligible projects are reimbursed by the EU budget when expenditure which has been found to be ineligible is replaced by new expenditure (‘withdrawal’) without an effective ex-ante verification by the Member State before programme closure (7). _____________ (6) Article 39(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 
Kot je Sodišče že navedlo v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2008, to povečuje tveganje, da se iz proračuna EU izplačajo povračila stroškov za neupravičene projekte, kadar se odhodki, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da niso upravičeni, nadomestijo z novimi („umik“), ne da bi država članica pred zaključkom programa uspešno izvedla predhodno preverjanje (7). _____________ (6) Člen 39(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1260/1999 (UL L 161, 26.6.1999, str.
1); Articles 91 and 92 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
1), člena 91 in 92 Uredbe (ES) št.
(7) See paragraphs 6.19 and 6.33 of the 2008 Annual Report. 
(7) Glej odstavka 6.19 in 6.33 letnega poročila za leto 2008.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 4.10. Member States are primarily responsible for ensuring the regularity of expenditure declared to the Commission. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 4.10 Države članice so odgovorne predvsem za zagotavljanje pravilnosti odhodkov, prijavljenih Komisiji.
The Commission performs its supervisory role through its own audit activity taking also account of other Community and national audit work and also through programmes negotiation, participation in monitoring committees, annual meetings with managing and audit authorities and by providing extensive guidance and seminars. 
Komisija opravlja svojo nadzorno vlogo z lastno revizijsko dejavnostjo, pri čemer upošteva tudi revizije drugih organov Skupnosti in nacionalnih organov, pa prek pogajanj o programih, sodelovanja v nadzornih odborih, letnih sestankov z upravljavskimi in revizijskimi organi ter z zagotavljanjem obsežnih navodil in seminarjev.
The Commission has strengthened its supervision through the imple­ mentation of its 2008 Action Plan (COM(2008) 97 final). 
Komisija je z izvedbo akcijskega načrta iz leta 2008 (COM(2008) 97 konč.) okrepila svojo nadzorno vlogo.
In 2009 the Commission adopted 7 suspension decisions and imposed financial corrections totalling 2,3 billion euro. 4.11. 
V letu 2009 je Komisija sprejela 7 sklepov o odložitvi plačil in naložila finančne popravke v višini 2,3 milijarde EUR.
The Commission refers to the vast simplification exercise of the Cohesion regulatory framework initiated in 2008 and completed in 2010, involving specific requirements of the sectoral regulations. 
4.11 Komisija se sklicuje na obsežno poenostavitev regulativnega okvira za kohezijo, ki se je začela leta 2008 in je bila dokončana leta 2010 ter je vključevala posebne zahteve sektorskih predpisov.
Possible shortcomings in the implementation of the EU rules on public procurement and State aid at a national, regional or local level in applying EU law are not specifically related to the imple­ mentation of cohesion projects. 
Morebitne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju pravil EU o javnih naročilih in državnih pomočeh na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni pri uporabi zakonodaje EU niso vezane samo na izvajanje kohezijskih projektov.
The 2007-2013 regulatory framework has been enhanced to ensure that beneficiaries are informed of all specific conditions for financing, implementing and reporting, and that managing authorities satisfy themselves that beneficiaries have the capacity to fulfil these conditions before approving projects. 
4.12 Regulativni okvir 2007–2013 je bil okrepljen z namenom, da bi zagotovili obveščenost upravičencev o vseh posebnih pogojih financiranja, izvajanja in poročanja ter da upravljavski organi pred odobritvijo projektov lahko preverijo, ali so upravičenci sposobni izpol­ niti te pogoje.
Moreover, since the beginning of the programming period the Commission has provided regular and early training and guidance to the competent authorities in the Member States. 
Poleg tega Komisija od začetka programskega obdobja pristojnim organom v državah članicah zagotavlja redno in pravočasno usposab­ ljanje in navodila.
Specific training actions were also foreseen in the Commission Action Plan adopted in February 2008 (COM(2008) 97 final) in that regard and are carried out on a regular basis. 
Posebni ukrepi usposabljanja na tem področju, ki se redno izvajajo, so bili predvideni tudi v akcijskem načrtu Komisije, sprejetem februarja 2008 (COM(2008) 97 konč.).
The regulatory framework for both 2000-2006 and 2007-2013 periods provide that funds allocations are to be used within a period of two or three years after they are committed to avoid an automatic decommitment of funds. 
4.13 Regulativni okvir za obdobji 2000–2006 in 2007–2013 določa, da je treba dodeljena sredstva porabiti v obdobju 2 ali 3 let po tem, ko so bile zanje prevzete obveznosti, da se prepreči avtoma­ tična sprostitev sredstev.
This ensures that expen­ diture is committed and paid evenly throughout the period and is not back-loaded in the last year. 
To zagotavlja, da se obveznosti za odhodke prevzemajo in plačila izvršujejo enakomerno skozi celotno obdobje, namesto da bi se nakopičili v zadnjem letu.
The Commission is also particularly vigilant that Member States’ management and control systems are effective throughout the imple­ mentation period up to closure and imposes financial corrections where necessary. 
Poleg tega je Komisija še posebej pozorna, da so upravljavski in kontrolni sistemi držav članic učinkoviti v celotnem obdobju izvajanja do zaključka projektov, ter po potrebi naloži finančne popravke.
EN 100 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 4.14. For the 2007-2013 programming period, the Commission’s acceptance of Member States’ compliance assessments (which accompany the management and control systems description reports) and audit strategies constitutes the first essential element in the control framework for Cohesion policy. 
SL 100 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 4.14 Zaprogramskoobdobje2007–2013jeprvibistveni element okvira kontrole za kohezijsko politiko Komisijina odobritev ocen skladnosti (ki so priložene poročilom z opisom upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov) in revizijskih strategij.
Unless and until it has approved the compliance assessments, the Commission does not authorise interim payments to the programme concerned. At the same time, Member States are allowed to start making payments to bene­ ficiaries through unapproved systems while awaiting the Commission’s approval to take place. The expenditure taking place during this period is at an increased risk of error. 
Če (in dokler) Komisija ne potrdi ocen skladnosti, ne dovoli nobenih vmesnih plačil zadevnemu programu, vendar lahko države članice med čakanjem na Komisijino potrditev ocen skladnosti začnejo izvrševati plačila upravičencem, pri čemer uporabljajo nepotrjene sisteme. Tveganje napak pri odhodkih, ki nastanejo v tem obdobju, je večje.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S The Commission is actively following up the risk identified in the 2008 annual report of the Court, in particular in the context of the closure of the 2000-2006 programmes. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Komisija aktivno spremlja tveganja, ugotovljena v letnem poročilu Sodišča za leto 2008, zlasti glede zaključka programov za obdobje 2000–2006.
The Commission has carried out its approval procedures (of compliance assessment reports and national audit strategies) within the deadlines set. 
4.14 Komisija je svoje postopke za odobritev (poročil o ocenah skladnosti in nacionalnih revizijskih strategij) izvedla v določenih rokih.
The risk identified by the Court is inherent to the regulatory length of time for the submission by Member States of compliance assessment reports and audit strategies. 
Tveganja, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, so posledica regulativnega roka, v katerem morajo države članice predložiti poročila o ocenah tveganja in revizijske strategije.
The Commission considers that this is a limited risk because the fact that it has not approved management and control systems yet does not mean that such systems, approved at national level, do not comply with requirements and do not function effectively. 
Komisija meni, da gre za manjše tveganje, saj dejstvo, da še ni odobrila upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov, ne pomeni, da ti sistemi, ki so odobreni na nacionalni ravni, niso skladni z zahtevami in ne delujejo učinkovito.
Mitigating controls are in place and the Structural Funds Direc­ torates-General have taken this risk into account in their audit strategy and also drawn this risk to the attention of the audit authorities. 
Vzpostavljene so kontrole za omejevanje tveganja; poleg tega so generalni direktorati za strukturne sklade to tveganje upoštevali v njihovi revizijski strategiji ter nanj opozorili tudi revizijske organe.
Each audit authority has to present to the Commission conclusions from the results of audits of representative samples of operations, which cover expenditure declared each year and an annual opinion on the effective functioning of the management and control systems. 
Vsak revizijski organ mora Komisiji sporočiti ugotovitve na podlagi rezultatov revizije reprezentativnih vzorcev dejavnosti, ki zajemajo odhodke, prijavljene vsako leto, ter letno predložiti mnenje o uspešnem delovanju upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov.
4.15. — The Commission notes that prefinancing, which by definition bears almost no risk, represents one third of its cohesion payments in 2009 (see table 4.1). 
4.15 — Komisija opozarja, da predhodno financiranje, ki po definiciji ne vključuje skoraj nobenega tveganja, predstavlja tretjino njenih kohezijskih plačil v letu 2009 (glej razpredelnico 4.1).
For the audit of Cohesion, the following specific points should be noted: — a sample of 180 interim and final payments was tested. 
Pri revidiranju področja kohezije je treba upoštevati naslednje: — preizkušen je bil vzorec s 180 vmesnimi in končnimi plačili.
69 % of these randomly selected payments relate to projects of the 2007-2013 programming period, and — prefinancing payments were not included in the sample because of the very low risk associated with this type of payment. 
69 % teh naključno izbranih plačil se nanaša na projekte iz programskega obdobja 2007–2013 in — plačila predfinanciranja niso bila vključena v vzorec, ker je za tovrstna plačila značilno zelo nizko tveganje.
4.16. Theassessmentofsystemscoveredthemanagement and control systems related to: — the compliance with certain key provisions specified in the regulatory framework for 16 OPs of the 2007-2013 programming period in 13 Member States, and — the processing and reporting of recoveries and withdrawals for four OPs and one Community Initiative of the 2000-2006 programming period in six Member States. 
4.16 Priocenjevanjusistemovsobiliocenjeniupravljavski in kontrolni sistemi, ki so se uporabljali za: — zagotavljanje skladnosti 16 operativnih programov iz programskega obdobja 2007–2013 z nekaterimi ključnimi določbami ureditvenega okvira v 13 državah članicah in — obdelavo izterjav in umikov ter poročanje o njih za štiri operativne programe in eno pobudo Skupnosti iz programskega obdobja 2000–2006 v šestih državah članicah.
In 2009 this was the case for 36 % (8) of the 180 audited projects. 
Leta 2009 so napake vplivale na 36 % (8) od 180 revidiranih projektov.
ThemostlikelyerrorrateestimatedbytheCourtis above 5 % (9). T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 4.18. The Commission notes that there is a trend for decrease in error frequency in the last three years, from 54 % in the Court’s annual report for 2007 to 36 % this year, as noted in Annex 4.1 to the Court’s report. 
4.19 Sodišče ocenjuje, da je najverjetnejša stopnja napak nad 5 % (9). O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 4.18 Komisija opozarja, da pogostost napak v zadnjih treh letih izkazuje trend upadanja, saj se je znižala s 54 % v letnem poročilu Sodišča za leto 2007 na 36 % letos, kot je navedeno v Prilogi 4.1 k poročilu Sodišča.
The Commission also underlines that 53 % of the errors are non-quantifiable. 
Komisija prav tako poudarja, da 53 % napak ni količinsko oprede­ ljivih.
In some cases these compliance errors would have had no impact on the reimbursement of expenditure, even if detected before certifying expenditure to the Commission. 4.19. 
V nekaterih primerih te napake glede skladnosti ne bi imele nobenega vpliva na povračilo odhodkov, tudi če bi bile ugotovljene pred potrditvijo odhodkov Komisiji.
In 2009, the Court estimates that at least 3 % of the expenditure certified to the Commission should not have been reim­ bursed, compared to at least 11 % for 2008. 
4.19 Leta 2009 je Sodišče ocenilo, da ne bi smelo biti povrnjenih najmanj 3 % odhodkov, potrjenih Komisiji, v primerjavi z najmanj 11 % v letu 2008.
This constitutes a significant improvement compared to previous years (see point 1.26). 
Gre za precejšnje izboljšanje v primerjavi s preteklimi leti (glej točko 1.26).
The Commission considers that this improvement reflects the enhanced control provisions in the 2007-2013 Cohesion regulatory framework, as well as the first impact of the 2008 Commission Action Plan to strengthen its supervisory role for structural actions. 
Komisija meni, da to izboljšanje odraža okrepljene določbe glede nadzora v kohezijskem regulativnem okviru 2007–2013, pa tudi prve učinke akcijskega načrta Komisije iz leta 2008 za krepitev njene nadzorne vloge pri strukturnih ukrepih.
The Commission is committed to actively pursue its efforts to reduce the errors even further. The Commission considers that in eight ERDF cases affected by a quantifiable error the national authorities had already applied propor­ tionate financial corrections before declaring the expenditure to the Commission. 
Komisija si bo aktivno prizadevala za nadaljnje zmanjšanje napak. Komisija meni, da so v 8 zadevah ESRR, na katere je vplivala količinsko opredeljiva napaka, nacionalni organi že uporabili soraz­ merne finančne popravke, preden so odhodke prijavili Komisiji.
As a result, there is no negative financial impact on the EU budget (see point (d) in box below). 
Zato to ni imelo negativnega finančnega učinka na proračun EU (glej točko (d) okvira v nadaljevanju).
The Commission follows up in a rigorous manner all errors detected by the Court and ensures that appropriate corrections are made where necessary, as it did for previous years (see Annex 4.4 to the Court’s report). 
4.20 Komisija dosledno spremlja vse napake, ki jih ugotovi Sodišče, ter tako kot že prejšnja leta zagotavlja, da se po potrebi izvedejo ustrezni popravki (glej Prilogo 4.4 k poročilu Sodišča).
Possible shortcomings in the implementation of public procurement rules at a national, regional or local level in applying EU law are not strictly related to the implementation of cohesion projects. 
Morebitne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju pravil o javnih naročilih na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni pri uporabi zakonodaje EU niso strogo vezane na izvajanje kohezijskih projektov.
The Commission has taken into account those errors for its risk assessment in its own audit work. 
Komisija je te napake upoštevala pri oceni tveganja v okviru lastne revizijske dejavnosti.
It has also taken other steps, such as providing specialised training on public procurement procedures on numerous occasions and issued guidance to programme authorities. 4.20. 
Izvedla je tudi druge ukrepe, kot je zagotavljanje specializiranega usposabljanja o postopkih javnega naročanja ob številnih priložnostih, ter izdala smernice organom, pristojnim za programe.
Amajorproportionoftheestimatederrorrateis attributable to eligibility errors, which are the most common type of quantifiable error in the audit sample. They were found in 24 payments to projects audited. 
4.20 Velik delež ocenjene stopnje napak je mogoče pripisati napakam v zvezi z upravičenostjo, ki so najpogostejša vrsta količinsko opredeljivih napak v revizijskem vzorcu.
The main causes of the eligibility errors were inclusion of costs which are not eligible for reimbursement and serious failures to respect public procurement rules (see the following examples). _____________ (8) See Annex 4.1. 
Odkrite so bile v 24 plačilih za revidirane projekte in so nastale predvsem zaradi vlaganja zahtevkov za stroške, ki niso upravičeni do povračila, in hujšega nespoštovanja pravil za oddajo javnega naročila (glej naslednje primere). _____________ (8) Glej Prilogo 4.1.
In 2008 and 2007, the corresponding figures were 43 % and 54 %, respectively. 
Leta 2008 so napake vplivale na 43 %, leta 2007 pa na 54 % revidiranih projektov.
(9) The error rates are calculated based on a representative statistical sample drawn from interim and final payments for 2009 (23 billion euro) with a 95 % confidence level as indicated in Table 4.1. 
(9) Stopnje napak so izračunane na podlagi reprezentativnega statistič­ nega vzorca vmesnih in končnih plačil za leto 2009 (23 milijard EUR) s 95-odstotno stopnjo zaupanja, kot je prikazano v tabeli 4.1.
In 2009 the Court estimates that at least 3 % of the expen­ diture certified by Member States to the Commission in Cohesion should not have been reimbursed. 
Sodišče ocenjuje, da leta 2009 vsaj 3 % odhodkov, ki so jih države članice za kohezijo potrdile Komisiji, ne bi smeli biti povrnjeni.
The corresponding figures in 2008 (2008 Annual Report, paragraph 6.17) and 2007 (2007 Annual Report, paragraph 6.27) were 11 %. 
Ta delež je v letih 2008 (letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavek 6.17) in 2007 (letno poročilo za leto 6.27) znašal 11 %.