natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Other buildings, however, are retained unoccupied. 
Druge stavbe pa ostajajo prazne.
For example: (a) Owned office buildings in Botswana and The Gambia have been unoccupied since 2004. (b) The residences in South Africa and Cape Verde have been unoccupied since 2012. (c) In Tanzania, the ex-residence of the head of delegation (see Figure 11) and a staff house have been unoccupied since 2009 at a cost of 25 000 euro per year for security, utilities and gardening. 
Na primer: (a) lastniške pisarniške stavbe v Bocvani in Gambiji so prazne od leta 2004; (b) rezidenci v Južni Afriki in na Zelenortskih otokih sta prazni od leta 2012; (c) v Tanzaniji sta nekdanja rezidenca vodje delegacije (glej sliko 11) in hiša za zaposlene prazni od leta 2009, stroški za njuno varovanje, komunalne storitve in vrtnarjenje pa znašajo 25 000 EUR letno.
They are located outside the area recommended by the regional security officer. 
Nahajata se zunaj območja, ki ga priporoča regionalni uradnik za varnost.
Another house owned by the delegation, which is located within the recommended security area, has been unoccupied since April 2014. 
Od aprila 2014 je prazna še ena hiša, ki je v lasti delegacije in se nahaja na priporočenem varnostnem območju.
Observations 24 Former residence in Tanzania empty since 2009, but retained by the EEAS Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Opažanja 24 Nekdanja rezidenca v Tanzaniji, ki je prazna od leta 2009, vendar jo je ESZD ohranila Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Some charges for co-location in office buildings do not recover full costs 26 The EEAS encourages solutions which involve sharing office premises with Member States or other EU institutions and bodies, including DG Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection. 
Nekateri zaračunani stroški za kolokacijo v pisarniških stavbah ne krijejo celotnih dejanskih stroškov 26 ESZD spodbuja rešitve, ki vključujejo souporabo pisarniških prostorov z državami članicami ali drugimi institucijami in organi EU, vključno z GD za humanitarno pomoč in civilno zaščito.
Co-location aims to ensure better visibility of the EU, facilitate cooperation with Member States and also save costs18. 
Namen kolokacije je zagotoviti boljšo prepoznavnost EU, olajšati sodelovanje z državami članicami in tudi zmanjšati stroške18.
There were 45 delegations sharing their office premises with either EU Member States or EU institutions and bodies in 2015. 
V letu 2015 si je 45 delegacij delilo pisarniške prostore z državami članicami EU ali institucijami in organi EU.
The number of delegations hosting or hosted by Member States’ embassies increased from 14 to 17 between May 2014 and May 201519. 
Število delegacij, ki so gostile veleposlaništva držav članic ali ki so jih veleposlaništva gostila, se je med majem 2014 in majem 2015 povečalo s 14 na 1719.
Annex I shows the 17 delegations where there was co-location with one or more Member States in 2015. 
Priloga I prikazuje 17 delegacij s kolokacijo z eno ali več državami članicami v letu 2015.
18 EEAS building policy: Delegation offices — policy and selection. 
18 Stavbna politika ESZD: pisarne delegacij – politika in izbira.
EEAS building policy: Sharing delegation offices or co-location with third parties. 
Stavbna politika ESZD: souporaba pisarn delegacije ali kolokacija s tretjimi osebami.
19 2014 and 2015 working documents on the EEAS building policy. 
19 Delovna dokumenta o stavbni politiki ESZD iz let 2014 in 2015.
Observations 25 27 Member States and EU institutions and bodies should pay their fair share of the costs involved in co-location20. 
Opažanja 25 27 Države članice ter institucije in organi EU bi morali plačevati celotni delež svojih stroškov za kolokacijo20.
In practice, there are different methods for calculating charges to co-locating organisations, some of which do not recover full costs. 
V praksi obstajajo različne metode za izračun stroškov, ki se zaračunavajo organizacijam v kolokaciji.
For example: (a) In Washington DC, the delegation has co-location agreements with five different organisations. 
Na primer: (a) delegacija v Washingtonu ima pogodbe o kolokaciji s petimi različnimi organizacijami.
However, only the two most recent agreements (with Europol and the European Investment Bank) include a contribution to administrative overheads. (b) In Nepal, DG Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection contributes to cleaning, maintenance, utilities and security guards. However, it makes no contribution to office rent, which would amount to a further 8 000 euro per year. 
Vendar pa samo dve najnovejši pogodbi (z Europolom in Evropsko investicijsko banko) vključujeta prispevke za upravne režijske stroške; (b) v Nepalu GD za humanitarno pomoč in civilno zaščito prispeva za čiščenje, vzdrževanje, komunalne storitve in za varnostnike, ne pa tudi za najem pisarn, kar bi pomenilo dodatnih 8 000 EUR letno.
Similarly, in Tanzania, where the delegation owns the building, the delegation charges EUCAP Nestor21 only for running costs (maintenance, utilities, security and cleaning). (c) The 2013 guidance to delegations on calculating the rent charged to other organisations required all new agreements, and existing agreements when renewed, to charge for common areas. 
Podobno je v Tanzaniji, kjer je delegacija lastnica stavbe, ki pa misiji EUCAP Nestor21 zaračunava le za tekoče stroške (vzdrževanje, komunalne storitve, varnost in čiščenje); (c) na podlagi smernic iz leta 2013 za delegacije o izračunu najemnine, ki se zaračunava drugim organizacijam, morajo nove pogodbe, pa tudi obstoječe, če se podaljšajo, vključevati tudi stroške za skupne prostore.
Charges set before 2013 only take into account the net office area of the tenant. 
Zaračunani stroški, določeni pred letom 2013, so vključevali le neto površino pisarn najemnika.
As a result, the tenant uses the common areas for free and pays less than its fair share of rent and operating costs. 
Najemnik tako uporablja skupne prostore brezplačno in plačuje manj, kot dejansko znaša njegov delež najemnine in operativnih stroškov.
Section II — There is a structured procedure for selecting delegation buildings but there are some weaknesses at each of the major stages when it is applied in practice 28 Section I examined the suitability of delegation buildings: whether they meet the needs of delegations and provide value for money. 
Oddelek II –Za izbiro stavb delegacije obstaja strukturiran postopek, vendar se pri njegovi uporabi v praksi pojavljajo nekatere slabosti v vseh glavnih fazah 28 V oddelku I je bila preučena ustreznost stavb delegacij: ali zadostujejo potrebam delegacij in ali so stroškovno učinkovite.
Whether or not delegation buildings are suitable depends first of all on the way they were selected. 
Ali so stavbe delegacij ustrezne ali ne, je odvisno predvsem od načina, kako so bile izbrane.
The audit therefore examined whether the EEAS has effective procedures for selecting the right buildings. 
Pri reviziji je bilo zato preučeno, ali ima ESZD vzpostavljene uspešne postopke za izbiro ustreznih stavb.
20 European Parliament Decision of 3 April 2014 on the discharge for 2012. 
20 Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 3. aprila 2014 o razrešnici za leto 2012.
21 EUCAP Nestor is an EU civilian mission, with some military expertise. 
21 EUCAP Nestor je civilna misija EU z delnim vojaškim strokovnim znanjem.
It supports the development of maritime security systems in Horn of Africa and Western Indian Ocean states, to enable them to fight piracy and other maritime crime more effectively. 
Podpira razvoj pomorskih varnostnih sistemov v državah Afriškega roga in zahodnega Indijskega oceana ter jim tako omogoča, da se uspešneje borijo proti piratstvu in drugemu pomorskemu kriminalu.
Observations 26 29 The building-file procedure provides a structured basis for selecting delegation buildings. 
Opažanja 26 29 Postopek na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah zagotavlja strukturirano osnovo za izbiro stavb delegacij.
However, there are some weaknesses when the building-file procedure is applied in practice. 
Vendar pa se pri uporabi tega postopka v praksi pojavljajo nekatere slabosti.
As a consequence, there is a risk that the EEAS may not select the right building. 
Zato obstaja tveganje, da ESZD ne izbere ustreznih stavb.
The weaknesses occur at each of the major stages of the building-file procedure: (a) when the delegation searches for suitable buildings; (b) when the delegation compares options and presents them to the Headquarters Building Committee; (c) when the Building Committee makes and explains its decision. 
Slabosti se pojavljajo v vseh glavnih fazah postopka na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah: (a) kadar delegacija išče ustrezne stavbe; (b) kadar delegacija primerja možnosti in jih predstavi odboru za stavbe pri sedežu; (c) kadar odbor za stavbe sprejme in utemelji svojo odločitev.
The building-file procedure provides a structured basis for selecting delegation buildings 30 The selection of buildings for rental or purchase is based on the EEAS building-file procedure. (a) For offices and residences, delegations have to prepare a building file before renting, buying or constructing a new building, or when renewing a rental agreement. 
Postopek na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah zagotavlja strukturirano osnovo za izbiro stavb delegacij 30 Izbira stavb za najem ali nakup temelji na postopku na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah, ki ga uporablja ESZD: (a) za pisarne in rezidence morajo delegacije pripraviti dokumentacijo o stavbah pred najemom, nakupom ali gradnjo nove stavbe ali pri podaljšanju najemne pogodbe.
Delegations are required to submit such building files to the Headquarters Building Committee for examination and approval if they have a total value of 60 000 euro or more. (b) Delegations also have to submit a building file to the Building Committee before any acquisition of land. (c) When renting staff accommodation, delegations have to submit a building file if the rent exceeds the ceiling set by the EEAS for the country concerned and for the countries where no ceilings have been set. 
Če znaša skupna vrednost stavb 60 000 EUR ali več, morajo delegacije predložiti dokumentacijo o stavbah odboru za stavbe pri sedežu v preučitev in odobritev; (b) delegacije morajo dokumentacijo o stavbah predložiti odboru za stavbe tudi pred vsakim nakupom zemljišča; (c) pri najemu stanovanj za zaposlene morajo delegacije dokumentacijo o stavbah predložiti, če najemnina presega zgornjo mejo, ki jo je določila ESZD za zadevno državo, in v primeru držav, za katere zgornje meje niso bile določene.
31 In providing a structured and documented foundation for decision-making based on guidance from headquarters, the building-file procedure is an example of good practice. 
31 Postopek na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah je primer dobre prakse pri zagotavljanju strukturirane in dokumentirane podlage za odločanje.
Building files use the objectives set out in the EEAS building policy as a basis for the selection criteria. 
Pri dokumentaciji o stavbah se uporabljajo cilji, ki so določeni v stavbni politiki ESZD kot osnova za izbirna merila.
The building file should contain a shortlist of suitable options resulting from the delegation’s research of the local property market, a discussion of whether to rent or buy, the delegation’s assessment of suitable options and its proposal to the Building Committee. 
Dokumentacija o stavbah bi morala vključevati ožji seznam ustreznih možnosti, ki bi ga pripravila delegacija na podlagi raziskave lokalnega nepremičninskega trga, razpravo o tem, ali naj se stavba najame ali kupi, oceno ustreznih možnosti, ki jo pripravi delegacija, in predlog odboru za stavbe.
The building-file procedure helps ensure that the selected buildings meet the needs of delegations whilst providing value for money. 
Postopek na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah pomaga zagotoviti, da izbrane stavbe zadostujejo potrebam delegacij, hkrati pa so stroškovno učinkovite.
Observations 27 Delegations have insufficient expertise to identify suitable buildings and do not receive sufficient support from headquarters 32 Our audit review of 30 building files (see Annex II) found that in most of them (26 out of 30), the delegation had explored the local market. 
Opažanja 27 Delegacije nimajo dovolj strokovnega znanja za opredelitev ustreznih stavb niti zadostne podpore s sedeža 32 Pri revizijskem pregledu 30 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah (glej Prilogo II) je bilo ugotovljeno, da so delegacije pri večini (26 od 30) raziskale lokalni trg.
However, only 15 of the 30 building files included a shortlist of suitable, realistic options (see Figure 12). 
Vendar je le 15 od 30 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah vključevalo ožji seznam ustreznih, realističnih možnosti (glej sliko 12).
Summary results of audit review of 30 building files 4 25 15 8 7 26 23 22 15 5 No Yes 1. 
Povzetek rezultatov revizijskega pregleda 30 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah 4 25 15 8 7 26 23 22 15 5 ne da 1.
Exploration of the local market 2. 
Raziskava lokalnega trga 2.
Discussion of whether to rent or buy 3. 
Razprava o tem, ali naj se stavba najeme ali kupi 3.
Shortlist of more than one suitable, realistic option 4. 
Ožji seznam več kot ene ustrezne, realistične možnosti 4.
Delegation's proposed solution based on sound technical and financial analysis 5. 
Rešitev, ki jo predlaga delegacija in temelji na dobri tehnični in finančni analizi 5.
Convincing reason for HQ Building Committee's decision Source: European Court of Auditors based on review of 30 building files. 
Prepričljiv razlog za odločitev odbora za stavbe pri sedežu Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi pregleda 30 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah.
Number of building files Figure 12 
Število primerov dokumentacije o stavbah Slika 12
Observations 28 33 In the audit survey, almost half of heads of administration considered that their delegation does not have sufficient staff and expertise to manage its buildings. 
Opažanja 28 33 V revizijski anketi je skoraj polovica vodij administracije menila, da njihova delegacija nima zadosti zaposlenih in strokovnega znanja za upravljanje svojih stavb.
Heads of administration are not building-management specialists and do not receive specific training in this area. 
Vodje administracije niso strokovnjaki za upravljanje stavb in niso opravili posebnega usposabljanja na tem področju.
In order to manage building projects (e.g. moving to a new office building or carrying out works), they may therefore require approval to bring in the necessary expertise (e.g. to analyse the market, carry out a rent-versus-buy analysis, negotiate with landlords or design and monitor building works). 
Za upravljanje projektov v zvezi s stavbami (npr. selitev v novo pisarniško stavbo ali izvedba gradbenih del) lahko torej zahtevajo odobritev za pridobitev potrebnega strokovnega znanja z zunanjimi izvajalci (npr. za analizo trga, analizo o tem, ali naj se stavba najame ali kupi, za pogajanja z lastniki ali za zasnovo in spremljanje gradbenih del).
For example, in Washington DC the delegation hires a broker locally to research the market and to negotiate with landlords on its behalf. 
Na primer, v Washingtonu delegacija najame lokalnega posrednika za raziskavo trga in za pogajanja z lastniki v njenem imenu.
In countries where such expertise cannot be bought in, delegations require more involvement and support from headquarters. 
V državah, kjer tovrstnega strokovnega znanja ni mogoče dobiti, delegacije zahtevajo več sodelovanja in podpore s sedeža.
34 The audit survey showed that 85 % of heads of administration were satisfied with the support they receive from headquarters when renewing office rentals. 
34 Revizijska anketa je pokazala, da je bilo 85 % vodij administracije zadovoljnih s podporo s sedeža pri podaljšanju najemnih pogodb za pisarne.
The level of satisfaction was lower for the support received when choosing new offices (76 %) (see Figure 13). 
Raven zadovoljstva je bila nižja za prejeto podporo pri izbiri novih pisarnah (76 %) (glej sliko 13).
Support to delegations for building-management activities 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Inadequate HQ support Adequate HQ support Renewing office rental Choosing new offices Maintenance and renovation Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations. 
Podpora delegacijam za dejavnosti upravljanja stavb 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% neustrezna podpora sedeža ustrezna podpora sedeža podaljšanje najemne pogodbe za pisarne izbira novih pisarn vzdrževanje in obnova Vir: Revizijska anketa za vodje administracije v delegacijah EU.
Respondents Figure 13 
Anketiranci Slika 13
Observations 29 35 A number of responses to the audit survey highlighted the need for more intensive support from headquarters, particularly where there is a lack of suitable buildings on the local market22. 
Opažanja 29 35 Številni odgovori na revizijsko anketo so poudarili potrebo po intenzivnejši podpori s sedeža, zlasti če na lokalnem trgu primanjkuje ustreznih stavb22.
Some delegations visited, for example Nepal (see Box 2), also highlighted the need for on-site visits, particularly when searching for new premises. 
Nekaj obiskanih delegacij, na primer delegacija v Nepalu (glej okvir 2), je prav tako poudarilo potrebo po obiskih na kraju samem, zlasti pri iskanju novih prostorov.
In 2014 the Headquarters Infrastructure Division visited 36 delegations to provide on-site support. 
V letu 2014 je oddelek za infrastrukturo pri sedežu obiskal 36 delegacij, da bi zagotovil podporo na kraju samem.
As an example of good practice, when German embassies are seeking new premises, once the head of administration has identified possible locations, staff from headquarters arrive on site to check their suitability and to help with negotiations. 
Primer dobre prakse so nemška veleposlaništva, ki, kadar iščejo nove prostore in ko vodja administracije določi možne lokacije, na te lokacije pripeljejo zaposlene na sedežu, ki preverijo njihovo ustreznost in pomagajo pri pogajanjih.
22 This was identified by respondents to the survey as one of the main obstacles when it comes to finding better premises. 
22 To je po mnenju anketirancev ena glavnih ovir pri iskanju boljših prostorov.
Need for headquarters support to find an office building in Nepal In Nepal, because of a lack of space in the main building, since 2007 a third of staff have been working in converted garages. 
Potreba po podpori s sedeža pri iskanju pisarniške stavbe v Nepalu V Nepalu zaradi pomanjkanja prostora v glavni stavbi tretjina zaposlenih od leta 2007 dela v za to prilagojenih garažah.
Since 2009, another third have been working in second-hand prefabricated cabins installed in the garden, presenting a poor image of the delegation (see Figure 14). 
Od leta 2009 še druga tretjina dela v rabljenih montažnih hiškah, nameščenih na vrtu, kar daje slabo podobo delegacije (glej sliko 14).
The June 2011 evaluation of the delegation to Nepal recommended that a move to more appropriate and modern offices should be planned by the time the lease came to an end in 2014. 
V oceni delegacije v Nepalu iz junija 2011 je bilo priporočeno, da bi bilo treba po poteku najemne pogodbe leta 2014 načrtovati selitev v ustreznejše in sodobnejše pisarne.
The delegation did not have the time and expertise necessary to produce a high-quality building file. 
Delegacija ni imela na voljo časa in strokovnega znanja, potrebnega za pripravo visokokakovostne dokumentacije o stavbah.
It considered that a visit from a team of property-management experts from headquarters (e.g. a negotiator, an architect and a security officer) could help to search for new premises, negotiate the best arrangements and identify and compare suitable solutions. 
Menila je, da bi ekipa strokovnjakov za upravljanje nepremičnin s sedeža (npr. pogajalec, arhitekt in uradnik za varnost) s svojim obiskom lahko pomagala poiskati nove prostore, izpogajati najboljše dogovore ter opredeliti in primerjati ustrezne rešitve.
However, headquarters was unable to carry out such a visit, despite written requests from the delegation in 2011 and 2012. 
Vendar pa sedež takega obiska ni mogel izpeljati, čeprav je delegacija za to pisno zaprosila leta 2011 in 2012.
Headquarters did write to the delegation to encourage it to develop its proposal to purchase land from the French embassy and to construct offices and a residence, but then rejected the proposal due to lack of funds. 
Sedež je delegaciji poslal dopis, v katerem jo spodbuja k pripravi predloga za nakup zemljišča od francoskega veleposlaništva ter izgradnjo pisarn in rezidence, vendar je nato zaradi pomanjkanja sredstev predlog zavrnil.
The delegation was unable to identify a suitable alternative and so submitted a building file to renew the existing lease until 2024 which was approved by headquarters in November 2013. Box 2 
Delegacija ni mogla najti ustrezne alternative in je tako predložila dokumentacijo o stavbah za podaljšanje obstoječe najemne pogodbe do leta 2024, kar je sedež novembra 2013 sprejel. Okvir 2
Observations 30 Pre-fabricated cabins used as offices in Nepal Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Opažanja 30 Montažne hišice, ki se v Nepalu uporabljajo kot pisarne Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
There are some weaknesses in the way delegations present options to headquarters 36 The building policy requires delegations to present to headquarters, through building files, the results of their research into the local property market. 
Obstajajo nekatere slabosti pri tem, kako delegacije sedežu predstavijo možnosti 36 Skladno s stavbno politiko morajo delegacije sedežu v okviru dokumentaciji o stavbah predložiti rezultate svoje raziskave lokalnega nepremičninskega trga.
This should include a discussion of whether to rent or buy, their assessment of suitable options and their proposal to the Building Committee. 
Ta bi morala vključevati razpravo o tem, ali naj se stavba najame ali kupi, njihovo oceno ustreznih možnosti in njihov predlog odboru za stavbe.
However: (a) delegations do not produce building files for all new contracts; (b) building files are unnecessarily detailed when delegations have no intention of moving; (c) building files rarely discuss the possibility of buying and do not compare it with the cost of renting; (d) in some building files, delegations do not present options in a comparable way; (e) guidance on preparing building files does not take into account space rented to other organisations and income generated by co-location. 
Vendar pa: (a) delegacije ne predložijo dokumentacije o stavbah za vse nove pogodbe; (b) je dokumentacija o stavbah po nepotrebnem preveč podrobna, kadar se delegacija ne namerava seliti; (c) dokumentacija o stavbah redko vključuje razpravo o možnosti nakupa in tega ne primerja s stroški najema; (d) v nekaterih primerih dokumentacije o stavbah delegacije ne predstavijo možnosti na način, ki omogoča primerjavo; (e) smernice za pripravo dokumentacije o stavbah ne upoštevajo prostorov, ki se oddajajo v najem drugim organizacijam, in dohodkov, ustvarjenih s kolokacijo.
Observations 31 Delegations do not produce building files for all new contracts 37 Delegations sometimes sign a building contract without producing and submitting a building file to the Building Committee, as required. 
Opažanja 31 Delegacije ne predložijo dokumentacije o stavbah za vse nove pogodbe 37 Delegacije včasih podpišejo pogodbe za gradnjo, ne da bi pripravile dokumentacijo o stavbah in jo predložile odboru za stavbe, kot se zahteva.
For example, there was no building file for the 230 000 euro contract for Venezuela offices signed in 2013 or the 240 000 euro contract for the residence in Nepal signed in 2011. 
Tako na primer ni bilo dokumentacije o stavbah za pogodbo v vrednosti 230 000 EUR za pisarne v Venezueli, sklenjeno leta 2013, ali za pogodbo v vrednosti 240 000 EUR za rezidenco v Nepalu, sklenjeno leta 2011.