natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evaluations, together with the impact assessment exercise, are essential tools for the Commission to study the impacts of a policy and to help prepare an informed opinion when drafting relevant legislative proposals49. 
Ocene, skupaj z oceno učinka, so bistveno orodje, s pomočjo katerega Komisija preuči učinke politike in pripravi utemeljeno mnenje, ko pripravlja posamezne zakonodajne predloge49.
However, evaluations in an environment of rapid reforms, as currently being experienced (2003 CAP reform followed by the 2008 ‘Health Check of the CAP’ reform, followed by the CAP post 2013 reform), have to rely on an analysis of the past which may no longer be fully relevant and/or come too late to be on their own of adequate help to the Commission. 
Vendar pa ob sedanjih hitrih reformah (reforma SKP iz leta 2003, ki ji je sledil pregled stanja SKP iz leta 2008, temu pa reforma SKP za obdobje po letu 2013) ocene temeljijo na analizah preteklega stanja, ki morda niso več povsem ustrezne in/ali jih Komisija prejme prepozno, da bi se nanje res lahko oprla.
For example, concerning the two audited meat sectors and schemes, the evaluations available50 when the Commission was developing the post 2013 CAP proposals only covered the situation pertaining to the decisions of the 2003 reform51 and not that post 2008. 
Za revidirana sektorja mesa in shemi so ocene, ki so bile na voljo50, ko je Komisija pripravljala predloge za SKP za obdobje po letu 2013, zajemale le stanje v zvezi z odločitvami iz reforme iz leta 200351, ne pa tudi tistimi po letu 2008.
However, Member States were already implementing provisions that resulted from the ‘Health Check of the CAP’ which improved and introduced new tools for the Member States52 to deal with potential disturbances in the audited sectors due to decoupling. 
Države članice pa so že izvajale določbe, ki izhajajo iz pregleda stanja SKP, ki je izboljšal obstoječa in uvedel nova orodja52, s katerimi so države članice lahko obravnavale morebitne motnje v revidiranih sektorjih, do katerih je prišlo zaradi uvedbe nevezane pomoči.
The same issues are relevant to an evaluation of CAP measures for the sheep and goat sector which was published in November 201153. 
Enako je bilo tudi pri oceni ukrepov SKP za sektor ovčjega in kozjega mesa, ki je bila objavljena novembra 201153.
49 Legislative proposals on the post 2013 CAP reform. 
49 Zakonodajni predlogi za reformo SKP za obdobje po letu 2013.
50 Evaluation of direct aids in the beef and veal sector, October 2010 and Evaluation of market effects of partial decoupling, October 2010. 
50 Ocenaneposrednepomoči v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa, oktober 2010, in Ocena učinkov delno nevezanih pomoči na trge, oktober 2010.
51 I.e. covering Article 69 measures of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
51 Tj. v zvezi z ukrepi iz člena 69 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
53 Evaluation of CAP measures for the sheep and goat sector – November 2011. 
53 Ocena ukrepov SKP za sektor ovčjega in kozjega mesa – november 2011.
As a result, the Council and the Parliament are currently called to take decisions on a new reform without fully absorbing the impacts of the 2008 reforms of the CAP which introduced important changes concerning the possibilities of providing specific support54. 
Tako morata Svet in Parlament sedaj sprejeti odločitve o novi reformi, ne da bi v celoti poznala učinke reforme SKP iz leta 2008, v okviru katere so bile uvedene pomembne spremembe glede možnosti zagotavljanja posebne podpore54.
54 For example, the 2010 report titled ‘Evaluation of market effects of partial decoupling’ (Evaluation of CAP measures concerning sectors subject to past or present direct support — Lot 1: Horizontal issues, p. 
54 Na primer v poročilu iz leta 2010: Ocena učinkov delno nevezanih pomoči na trge (Ocena ukrepov SKP v zvezi s sektorji, ki jim je bila ali jim je namenjena neposredna podpora – Sklop 1: Horizontalna vprašanja, str.
2) stated that its aim was to analyse the effects of coupled or partially coupled aids — as they are established by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — on the market, within a general context of total decoupling. 
2) je navedeno, da je bil njegov cilj analizirati učinke vezanih ali delno vezanih vrst pomoči – kot so opredeljene v Uredbi (ES) 1782/2003 – na trg, znotraj splošnega okvira uvedbe popolne nevezanosti.
Similarly, the report published in 2010 titled ‘Evaluation of direct aids in the beef and veal sector’ focuses on the period 2005–07 and does not cover the effects of legal provisions introduced with Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
Podobno se tudi poročilo Ocena neposredne pomoči v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa, objavljeno leta 2010, osredotoča na obdobje 2005–2007 in ne zajema učinkov pravnih predpisov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št.
The Court did not find conclusive evidence to demonstrate that the suckler cow and ewe and goat schemes, as under the partial implementation option of SPS, are in general a more effective tool than decoupled aid, allied with other EU and nationally funded measures, to maintain production and thus sustain economic activity in regions with few economic alternatives and generate environmental benefits. 
Sodišče ni našlo prepričljivih dokazov za to, da sta shemi za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze, ki se uporabljata v okviru možnosti delnega izvajanja SEP, na splošno uspešnejše sredstvo za ohranjanje proizvodnje in s tem gospodarske dejavnosti v regijah z malo drugimi gospodarskimi možnostmi ter za ustvarjanje koristi za okolje kot nevezana pomoč v povezavi z drugimi ukrepi, ki jih financirajo EU in države članice.
A number of Member States have concluded that the intended effects of the schemes would be better addressed by total decoupling of the premiums along with a coordinated approach of using Pillar I and Pillar II funds to support the sectors in fragile areas or for specific purposes. 
Več držav članic je ugotovilo, da bi bilo načrtovane učinke lažje doseči z uvedbo v celoti nevezanih premij ob usklajenem pristopu uporabe sredstev iz stebra I in stebra II, namenjenih podpori za sektorje na občutljivih območjih ali za posebne namene.
Accordingly, there is a growing trend to absorb the audited aid schemes into SPS and to rely on alternative instruments to protect vulnerable sectors. 
Zato se revidirani shemi pomoči vedno bolj vključujeta v SEP, za zaščito ranljivih sektorjev pa se uporabljajo drugi instrumenti.
The Commission has proposed that voluntary coupled aid should be permitted beyond 2013 in certain sectors, including the audited sectors. 
Komisija je predlagala, da se prostovoljna vezana pomoč v nekaterih sektorjih, vključno z revidiranima sektorjema, dovoli tudi po letu 2013.
Neither the Council nor the European Parliament has yet reacted formally to the Commission’s proposal. 
Svet in Evropski parlament se na ta predlog Komisije še nista uradno odzvala.
The recommendations below suggest detailed changes that the legislator might wish to include in any revised scheme if the Commission’s proposal is accepted. 
V spodnjih priporočilih so navedene natančne spremembe, ki bi jih zakonodajalec morda želel vključiti v morebitno revidirano shemo, če bo predlog Komisije sprejet.
ARE SUCKLER COW AND EWE AND GOAT SCHEMES TARGETED TO THE MOST RELEVANT REGIONS IN MEMBER STATES? 
ALI STA SHEMI ZA KRAVE DOJILJE TER OVCE IN KOZE USMERJENI V NAJRELEVANTNEJŠE REGIJE V DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH?
Member States were allowed to maintain the suckler cow and ewe and goat schemes because of production risks in certain sectors and regions. 
Države članice so lahko obdržale shemi za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze zaradi tveganja za proizvodnjo v nekaterih sektorjih in regijah.
The audit concluded that most of the funds under the audited schemes are made available across Member States’ territories. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da je večina sredstev iz revidiranih shem na voljo na celotnem ozemlju držav članic.
Thus, despite the legislator’s emphasis on fragile regions, the schemes, as designed, do not focus on those regions and areas where local production is vital to the economy and the environment and where no alternatives exist. 
Zato ti shemi, kakor sta zasnovani, kljub poudarku, ki ga je zakonodajalec namenil občutljivim regijam, nista osredotočeni na tiste regije in območja, kjer je lokalna proizvodnja ključnega pomena za gospodarstvo in okolje in kjer ni drugih možnosti.
The effects of the schemes are therefore diluted by the lack of targeting (paragraphs 15 to 17). 
Tako so učinki teh shem zaradi premajhne usmerjenosti razvodeneli (odstavki od 15 do 17).
The only targeted measures foreseen in the aids for both sectors are the additional premiums where these apply and which can only be paid to farmers located in certain areas. 
Edini usmerjeni ukrepi, predvideni v okviru pomoči za oba sektorja, so dodatne premije, kjer se te uporabljajo, saj se lahko izplačujejo le kmetom na določenih območjih.
However, these are of limited financial significance and/or in the process of being decoupled (paragraphs 18 to 21). 
Vendar pa imajo te omejen finančni pomen in/ali postopoma postajajo nevezane (odstavki od 18 do 21).
36 RECOMMENDATION 1 The Commission should add a targeting requirement for coupled direct aid schemes. 
36 PRIPOROČILO 1 Komisija naj za sheme vezane neposredne pomoči doda zahtevo po usmerjenosti.
In particular, the Commission’s implementing rules should require the Member States to identify and justify agricultural areas in which coupled animal premiums could have a demonstrably beneficial effect and where there is a lack of real viable alternatives. 
Zlasti izvedbene določbe Komisije bi morale zahtevati, da države članice opredelijo kmetijska območja, na katerih bi vezane premije na glavo živine lahko imele dokazljive pozitivne učinke in na katerih primanjkuje resničnih izvedljivih drugih možnosti, ter to utemeljijo.
ARE THE SUCKLER COW AND EWE AND GOAT SCHEMES EFFECTIVE IN MAINTAINING SPECIFIC PRODUCTION AND THUS AVOIDING NEGATIVE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES? 
ALI STA SHEMI ZA KRAVE DOJILJE TER OVCE IN KOZE UČINKOVITI PRI OHRANJANJU OPREDELJENE PROIZVODNJE IN PREPREČEVANJU NEGATIVNIH SOCIALNIH, GOSPODARSKIH IN OKOLJSKIH UČINKOV?
A comparison between Member States having completely decoupled support and Member States having maintained the audited support schemes does not provide any conclusive evidence in favour of the overall effectiveness of the latter in maintaining production (paragraphs 22 to 28). 
Primerjava med državami članicami, ki so uvedle v celoti nevezano podporo, in državami članicami, ki so ohranile revidirani shemi podpore, ne prinaša prepričljivih dokazov, ki bi podpirali splošno uspešnost teh shem pri ohranjanju proizvodnje (odstavki od 22 do 28).
The impact of exogenous and contextual factors influencing the sectors is predominant, rather than the impact of the schemes as such (paragraphs 29 and 30). 
Učinek zunanjih dejavnikov in okoliščin, ki vplivajo na sektorja, je pomembnejši od učinka shem (odstavka 29 in 30).
However, there was evidence that, in fragile regions, decoupling of the premiums has resulted in a reduction in livestock production (paragraph 41). 
Vendar pa obstajajo dokazi, da je uvedba nevezanih premij v občutljivih regijah povzročila upad živinoreje (odstavek 41).
RECOMMENDATION 2 The Commission, in coordination with the Member States, should clarify the most relevant types of specific farming activities (e.g. extensive grazing systems, shepherding, etc.) to maintain agricultural production and sustain economic activity in regions with few economic alternatives and generate environmental benefits. 
PRIPOROČILO 2 Komisija naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami razjasni, katere vrste posebnih kmetijskih dejavnosti (npr. sistemi ekstenzivne paše, pastirska ovčereja itn.) so najrelevantnejši za ohranjanje proizvodnje in podpiranje gospodarske dejavnosti v regijah z malo drugimi gospodarskimi možnostmi ter za zagotavljanje okoljskih koristi.
To maximise the effectiveness of EU support to the audited sectors, such support should be focused on farmers and specific farming activities in disadvantaged regions facing environmental, social and economic risks. 
Da bi bila podpora EU za revidirana sektorja kar najuspešnejša, bi morala biti usmerjena h kmetom in posebnim kmetijskim dejavnostim v prikrajšanih regijah, ki se soočajo z okoljskimi, družbenimi in ekonomskimi tveganji.
Suckler cow and sheep and goat farmers’ production decisions are affected by the panoply of different support measures available to them coming from different sources. 
Na odločitve rejcev krav dojilj ter ovac in koz v zvezi s proizvodnjo vplivajo številni podporni ukrepi, ki so jim na voljo iz različnih virov.
To the extent that coupled aid schemes are deemed necessary, they are likely to have a greater impact if they are focused and better orientated towards farm competitiveness (paragraphs 31 and 32). 
Kjer sheme vezane pomoči veljajo za potrebne, je verjetno, da bodo imele večji učinek, če so osredotočene in bolje usmerjene na konkurenčnost kmetij (odstavka 31 in 32).
There were no discernible differences between Member States using full or partial implementation of SPS in trends concerning social, economic and environmental aspects such as meat production, number of beneficiaries and animals, and area under permanent pasture (paragraphs 24 to 28 and 33 to 40). 
Med državami članicami, ki izvajajo SEP v celoti ali delno, ni opazne razlike pri trendih, ki zadevajo socialne, gospodarske in okoljske vidike, kot so proizvodnja mesa, število upravičencev in živali ter površina, ki se uporablja kot trajni pašnik (odstavki od 24 do 28 ter od 33 do 40).
ARE THE SUCKLER COW AND EWE AND GOAT SCHEMES WELL MONITORED AND ASSESSED BY THE COMMISSION AND THE MEMBER STATES? 
ALI KOMISIJA IN DRŽAVE ČLANICE DOVOLJ DOBRO SPREMLJAJO IN OCENJUJEJO SHEMI ZA KRAVE DOJILJE TER OVCE IN KOZE?
In most Member States visited, monitoring of performance indicators was weak due to the lack of an ad hoc performance monitoring system for measuring the results and outcomes of the audited schemes, and the different interpretations of the terms ‘production’ and ‘supply to the processing industry’ by each Member State (paragraphs 43 to 46). 
V večini obiskanih držav članic je bilo spremljanje kazalnikov uspešnosti slabo zaradi neobstoja ad hoc sistema za spremljanje uspešnosti, s pomočjo katerega bi bilo mogoče meriti rezultate in izide revidiranih shem, ter zaradi različnega razumevanja pojmov proizvodnja in preskrba predelovalne industrije v posameznih državah članicah (odstavki od 43 do 46).
An additional constraint in the monitoring by the Commission was the lack of an appropriate tool providing a global view of the aids that are available from different sources (paragraphs 47 to 49). 
Dodatna omejitev pri spremljanju, ki ga izvaja Komisija, je bilo dejstvo, da ni bilo ustreznega orodja, ki bi zagotavljalo globalen pregled nad vrstami pomoči, ki so na voljo iz različnih virov (odstavki od 47 do 49).
The rapid pace of recent CAP reforms does not always enable precise quantitative assessments to be made in a timely manner. 
Hitro izvajanje nedavnih reform SKP pogosto ne omogoča pravočasnega natančnega kvantitativnega ocenjevanja.
Thus, the Commission’s system for assessing the impacts of the audited schemes is hindered by the unavailability of an evaluation of the 2008 ‘Health Check’ (paragraphs 42 and 50 to 53). 
Zato sistem Komisije za ocenjevanje učinkov revidiranih shem ovira pomanjkanje ocen pregleda stanja SKP iz leta 2008 (odstavki 42 in od 50 do 53).
37 Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
37 Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP
38 RECOMMENDATION 3 The Commission should specify the monitoring requirements and arrangements expected from Member States for the aid schemes concerning the animal sectors and include these in a legal requirement, such as an implementing act, requiring Member States to use appropriate performance indicators and up-to-date data which are well linked to the envisaged outcomes from the animal aid schemes. 
38 PRIPOROČILO 3 Komisija naj natančno opredeli zahteve glede spremljanja in ureditev, ki se pričakujejo od držav članic v zvezi s shemami pomoči za živinorejske sektorje, ter te zahteve vključi v zakonsko zahtevo, na primer v izvedbeni akt, ki bi zahteval, da države članice uporabljajo ustrezne kazalnike uspešnosti in ažurne podatke, ki so dobro povezani s predvidenimi izidi shem pomoči za živali.
The Commission should implement a permanent monitoring framework that would indicate all the direct aids paid to support the animal sectors in the Member States, including national aids and Pillar II support, by collecting and monitoring information in a comprehensive manner across the EU. 
Komisija naj s pomočjo celovitega zbiranja in spremljanja podatkov iz celotne EU izvaja stalni okvir spremljanja, ki bi zajel vse vrste neposredne pomoči za podporo živinorejskim sektorjem v državah članicah, vključno z nacionalno pomočjo in podporo iz stebra II.
By doing so, the Commission would take into consideration the overall effects of different types of schemes aimed at the animal sectors and identify potential synergies amongst them, with a view to avoiding double funding under support instruments which have similar objectives. 
S tem bi Komisija upoštevala skupne učinke različnih vrst shem, namenjenih živinorejskim sektorjem, in opredelila morebitne sinergije med njimi, kar bi preprečilo dvojno financiranje v okviru podpornih instrumentov s podobnimi cilji.
RECOMMENDATION 4 The Commission in coordination with the Member States should undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the different support schemes and, where appropriate, assess the impacts of alternative measures to improve production quality and competitiveness, e.g. by encouraging herd improvements. 
PRIPOROČILO 4 Komisija naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami izvede celovito oceno učinka različnih podpornih shem in po potrebi oceni učinke drugih mogočih ukrepov za izboljšanje proizvodne kakovosti in konkurenčnosti, npr. s spodbujanjem izboljšanja črede.
This report was adopted by Chamber I, headed by Mr Ioannis SARMAS, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 20 June 2012. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat I, ki ga vodi Ioannis SARMAS, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju 20. junija 2012.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President 39 Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik 39 Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP
OVERVIEW OF SUCKLER COW AND SHEEP AND GOAT COUPLED DIRECT PAYMENTS IN THE MEMBER STATES IMPLEMENTING SPS 40 ANNEX I Member States Sheep and goat Starting year Suckler cow Starting year EU ceiling 2005 Sheep and goat Suckler cow Basic Supplementary Basic Additional Belgium Decoupled 2005 Coupled / N/A N/A 77 565 000 19 389 000 Denmark 2012 / Decoupled 2005 855 000 N/A N/A N/A Germany Decoupled 2005 Decoupled 2005 N/A N/A N/A N/A Ireland Decoupled 2005 Decoupled 2005 N/A N/A N/A N/A Greece Decoupled 2006 Decoupled 2006 180 300 000 63 200 000 25 700 000 3 100 000 Spain 2010 / Coupled / 366 997 000 111 589 000 279 830 000 28 937 000 France 2010 / 25 % decoupled in 2010 / 133 716 000 40 208 000 734 908 000 1 137 000 Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
PREGLED VEZANIH NEPOSREDNIH PLAČIL ZA KRAVE DOJILJE TER OVCE IN KOZE V DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH, KI IZVAJAJO SEP 40 PRILOGA I Država članica Ovce in koze Začetno leto Krave dojilje Začetno leto Zgornja meja za plačila EU v letu 2005 Ovce in koze Krave dojilje Osnovna Dodatna Osnovna Dodatna Belgija nevezana 2005 vezana N/R N/R 77 565 000 19 389 000 Danska 2012 nevezana 2005 855 000 N/R N/R N/R Nemčija nevezana 2005 nevezana 2005 N/R N/R N/R N/R Irska nevezana 2005 nevezana 2005 N/R N/R N/R N/R Grčija nevezana 2006 nevezana 2006 180 300 000 63 200 000 25 700 000 3 100 000 Španija 2010 vezana 366 997 000 111 589 000 279 830 000 28 937 000 Francija 2010 25 % nevezana v letu 2010 133 716 000 40 208 000 734 908 000 1 137 000 Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP
ANNEX I 2006 13 800 000 300 000 42 Member States Sheep and goat Starting year Suckler cow Starting year N/A N/A N/A Luxembourg Decoupled 2005 Decoupled 2005 N/A N/A N/A 10 900 000 N/A Malta Decoupled 2007 Decoupled 2007 53 000 18 000 26 000 3 000 Netherlands Decoupled Decoupled 2006 N/A Austria Decoupled 2005 Coupled / N/A N/A 70 578 000 99 000 Portugal Coupled / Coupled / 21 892 000 7 184 000 79 031 000 9 503 000 Slovenia 2010 / Decoupled 2007 520 000 178 000 5 183 000 626 000 Finland Coupled / Decoupled 2006 1 200 000 400 000 9 300 000 600 000 Sweden Decoupled 2005 Decoupled 2005 N/A N/A N/A N/A United Kingdom Decoupled 2005 Decoupled 2005 N/A N/A N/A N/A TOTAL 1 Source: European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development DG, Unit D1 Implementation of Specific Support (Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009). 
11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP PRILOGA I 42 Država članica Ovce in koze Začetno leto Krave dojilje Začetno leto N/R N/R N/R Luksemburg nevezana 2005 nevezana 2005 N/R N/R N/R N/R Malta nevezana 2007 nevezana 2007 53 000 18 000 26 000 3 000 Nizozemska nevezana nevezana 2006 N/A 1 Vir: Evropska komisija, GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, Enota D1 za izvajanje posebne podpore (člen 68 Uredbe (ES) št.
Provisional figures notified by Member States and still subject to modification. 
Začasni podatki, ki so jih posredovale države članice in se še spreminjajo.
DS/2010/03 updated 5.9.2011. 
DS/2010/03, posodobljeno 5.
719 333 000 223 077 000 EU ceiling 2005 Sheep and goat 1 293 021 000 Suckler cow Basic Supplementary Basic Additional Italy Decoupled 2005 Decoupled 2005 N/A 63 394 000 Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
Zgornja meja za plačila EU v letu 2005 Ovce in koze Krave dojilje Osnovna Dodatna Osnovna Dodatna Italija nevezana 2005 nevezana 2005 N/R 2006 13 800 000 300 000 10 900 000 Avstrija nevezana 2005 vezana / N/A N/A 70 578 000 99 000 Portugalska vezana / vezana / 21 892 000 7 184 000 79 031 000 9 503 000 Slovenija 2010 / nevezana 2007 520 000 178 000 5 183 000 626 000 Finska vezana / nevezana 2006 1 200 000 400 000 9 300 000 600 000 Švedska nevezana 2005 nevezana 2005 N/R N/R N/R N/R Združeno kraljestvo nevezana 2005 nevezana 2005 N/R N/R N/R N/R TOTAL 719 333 000 223 077 000 1 293 021 000 63 394 000 Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP