natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We have 95 % confidence that the estimated level of error in the population lies between 1,6 % and 6,0 % (the lower and upper error limits respectively). 
Sodišče s 95-odstotno stopnjo zaupanja ugotavlja, da je ocenjena stopnja napake v populaciji med 1,6% in 6,0% (spodnja oz. zgornja meja napake).
(35) The figure quoted is the best estimate based on a representative sample of 108 transactions. 
(35) Navedena številka je najboljša ocena na podlagi reprezentativnega vzorca 108 transakcij.
We have 95 % confidence that the rate of error in the population lies between 3,0 % and 8,6 % (the lower and upper level error limits respectively). 
Sodišče s 95-odstotno stopnjo zaupanja ugotavlja, da je stopnja napake v populaciji med 3,0 % in 8,6 % (spodnja oz. zgornja meja stopnje napake).
C 375/302 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 Source: European Court of Auditors. 
C 375/302 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Projects EN 29. 
Projekti SL 29.
Of the 125 payment transactions relating to projects that we examined, 35 (28 %) were affected by error. 
Napake so vplivale na 35 (28%) od 125 plačilnih transakcij, povezanih s projekti, ki jih je Sodišče preučilo.
Of the 28 (80 %) payment transactions affected by quantifiable errors, 16 were final transactions authorised after all ex-ante checks had been carried out. 
Med 28 (80%) plačilnimi transakcijami, na katere so vplivale količinsko opredeljive napake, je bilo 16 končnih transakcij, ki so bile odobrene po izvedbi vseh predhodnih pregledov.
As was the case in previous years (36), the Commission and its implementing partners committed more errors in transactions relating to programme estimates, grants and contribution agreements with international organisations than in other forms of support. 
Kot v prejšnjih letih (36) so Komisija in njeni izvajalski partnerji naredili več napak v transakcijah v zvezi s predračuni za programe, nepovratnimi sredstvi in sporazumi o prispevku z mednarodnimi organizacijami kot pri drugih vrstah podpore.
Of the 71 transactions of this type examined, 25 (35 %) were affected by quantifiable errors which accounted for 79 % of the estimated level of error. 
Preučenih je bilo 71 takih transakcij, na 25 (35 %) od njih pa so vplivale količinsko opredeljive napake, ki so pomenile 79% ocenjene stopnje napake.
Figure 3 — Breakdown of the estimated level of error THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS (36) Paragraph 31 of the 2014 annual report. 
Slika 3 – Razčlenitev ocenjene stopnje napake UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA (36) Odstavek 31 letnega poročila za leto 2014.
The main types of quantifiable error concerned: (a) essential supporting documentation not provided (13 transactions) (37); (b) non-compliance by the beneficiary with procurement rules (seven transactions); (c) ineligible expenditure, such as expenditure relating to activities not covered by the contract (seven transactions), ineligible VAT (two transactions), expenditure incurred outside the implementation period (two transactions) and indirect costs claimed as direct costs (one transaction); (d) expenditure not incurred by beneficiaries (seven transactions); (e) incorrect calculation of expenditure (four transactions). 
Glavne vrste količinsko opredeljivih napak so bile: (a) bistvena dokazila niso bila zagotovljena (13 transakcij) (37); (b) upravičenec ni upošteval pravil javnega naročanja (sedem transakcij); (c) neupravičeni odhodki, kot so odhodki za dejavnosti, ki niso bile vključene v pogodbo (sedem transakcij), neupravičen DDV (dve transakciji), odhodki, ki so nastali zunaj obdobja izvajanja (dve transakciji), in posredni stroški, prijavljeni kot neposredni (ena transakcija); (d) odhodki, ki niso nastali pri upravičencih (sedem transakcij); (e) napačen izračun odhodkov (štiri transakcije).
Essential supporting documentation not provided We examined a clearance of expenditure incurred under the ‘Support to the Institutional Development of the Ministry of Interior’ programme implemented by a national development aid agency in Mozambique. We tested 10 expenditure items. 
Bistvena dokazila niso bila zagotovljena Sodišče je pregledalo obračun odhodkov, nastalih v okviru programa podpore institucionalnemu razvoju ministrstva za notranje zadeve, ki ga izvaja nacionalna agencija za razvojno pomoč v Mozambiku.
For four of them, relating to supply of laboratory, IT and office equipment amounting to 874309 euro, the essential supporting documents for the expenditure (e.g. evidence of goods delivery, certificate of origin or procurement documents) were not provided. 
Za štiri izmed njih, ki so se nanašale na dobavo opreme za laboratorij, opreme IT in pisarniške opreme ter so skupaj znašale 874 309 EUR, bistvena dokazila za odhodke (npr. dokazilo o dostavi blaga, potrdilo o poreklu ali razpisna dokumentacija) niso bila predložena.
Non-compliance by the beneficiary with procurement rules We examined the final payment of 427 956 euro under a supply contract for agricultural product testing laboratory equipment in Ethiopia. 
Upravičenec ni upošteval pravil javnega naročanja Sodišče je preučilo končno plačilo v višini 427 956 EUR v okviru pogodbe o dobavi opreme za laboratorijsko analizo kmetijskih proizvodov v Etiopiji.
Under the EU procurement rules, the contract should have been awarded following an open international tender. 
V skladu s pravili EU za javna naročila bi bilo treba za oddajo tega naročila uporabiti odprt mednarodni razpis.
Instead, the contract was awarded directly to a consulting company without any competitive procedure. 
To naročilo pa je bilo neposredno oddano svetovalni družbi brez kakršnega koli konkurenčnega postopka.
This was not justified. 
To ni bilo utemeljeno.
In addition, the company was not an authorised distributor of the procured equipment, but only acted as an intermediary and procured the equipment from an authorised distributor. 
Poleg tega izbrana družba ni bila pooblaščeni distributer naročene opreme, temveč je delovala le kot posrednik in opremo naročila od pooblaščenega distributerja.
The absence of competitive tendering without justification was in breach of the principle of equal treatment and resulted in restricted competition. of the European Union THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES C 375/303 Figure 4 — Examples of quantifiable errors in project transactions Figure 4 — Examples of quantifiable errors in project transactions Essential supporting documentation not provided Among others, one of the corrective measures foreseen by the Commission is the inclusion of the sampled contract in 2016 Audit Plan, which was decided prior to the Court’s visit. In addition, the recovery procedure has been initiated for the full amount found ineligible by the Court. 
To, da brez utemeljitve ni bil uporabljen konkurenčen razpisni postopek, je kršitev načela enakega obravnavanja in je privedlo do omejevanja konkurence. Bistveni dokazi niso bili predloženi Med drugim je eden od popravnih ukrepov, ki jih je predvidela Komisija, vključitev vzorčne pogodbe v revizijski načrt za leto 2016, kar je bilo odločeno pred obiskom Računskega sodišča. Poleg tega je bil sprožen postopek izterjave za celoten znesek, za katerega je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da je neupravičen.
Non-compliance by the beneficiary with procurement rules The Commission is implementing relevant corrective measures, i.e. the recovery procedure has been initiated for the full amount found ineligible by the Court. 
Upravičenčevo nespoštovanje pravil javnega naročanja Komisija izvaja ustrezne popravne ukrepe, in sicer je začela postopek izterjave za celoten znesek, za katerega je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je neupravičen.
In addition, the Commission launched an external expenditure verification of all Programme Estimates managed by the contractor, pending receipt of final reports in order to establish the full amount due. 
Poleg tega je Komisija začela zunanje preverjanje odhodkov za vse ocene programov, ki jih upravlja izvajalec, pri čemer še niso bila prejeta končna poročila za določitev celotnega zapadlega zneska.
(37) We report quantifiable errors in cases where no documentation is available at all, where there is no evidence that a reported activity actually took place, or where there is no link between the expenditure charged and the documentation provided. 
Slika 4 – Primeri količinsko opredeljivih napak v transakcijah v zvezi s projekti (37) Sodišče o količinsko opredeljivih napakah poroča, kadar ni na voljo nobene dokumentacije, kadar ni dokazov, da je prijavljena dejavnost dejansko potekala, ali kadar ni povezave med zaračunanimi odhodki in zagotovljeno dokumentacijo.
There are two main reasons for reporting missing documentation: (i) either the document has never existed (this should have been detected by ex-ante checks); or (ii) the document exists but could not be retrieved, which points to a weakness in document management. 
O manjkajoči dokumentaciji poročamo iz dveh razlogov: (i) ali dokument ni nikoli obstajal, kar bi morali odkriti predhodni pregledi, ali (ii) dokument obstaja, vendar ga ni bilo mogoče najti, kar kaže na slabost v vodenju dokumentacije.
EN C 375/304 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Ineligible expenditure We examined a clearance of expenditure amounting to 76609 euro under the ‘Facilité de Coopération Technique’ programme in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. 
SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA Neupravičeni odhodki Sodišče je preučilo obračun odhodkov v višini 76 609 EUR v okviru programa sklada za tehnično sodelovanje v Demokratični republiki Kongo.
One item concerned extension works on a building that was not covered by the programme. 
Ena postavka je zadevala gradbena dela za povečanje stavbe, ki ni bila vključena v program.
In addition, the works were carried out between August and December 2013, outside the implementation period from December 2013 to March 2015. 
Poleg tega so bila dela izvedena med avgustom in decembrom 2013, kar je zunaj obdobja izvajanja od decembra 2013 do marca 2015.
Expenditure not incurred by the beneficiary We examined a clearance of prefinancing under the ‘Accelerate progress towards Millenium Development Goal 1c (38)’ programme implemented in Mozambique. 
Odhodki, ki niso nastali pri upravičencu Sodišče je pregledalo obračunavanje predfinanciranja v okviru programa za hitrejši napredek pri doseganju razvojnega cilja tisočletja 1c (38), ki se izvaja v Mozambiku.
The international organisation implementing the programme correctly indicated in its financial report that 3 651 772 euro was incurred in actual costs and a further 1 362 182 euro represented legal commitments (not yet incurred). 
Mednarodna organizacija, ki izvaja program, je v svojem finančnem poročilu pravilno navedla, da so nastali dejanski stroški v višini 3651772 EUR, dodatnih 1362182 EUR pa so znašale pravne obveznosti (stroški, ki še niso nastali).
DG DEVCO mistakenly accepted the total amount of 5 013 954 euro as eligible actual costs. 
GD DEVCO je pomotoma sprejel skupni znesek 5 013 954 EUR kot upravičene dejanske stroške.
In nine cases of quantifiable error, the Commissionhad sufficient information (39), via its systems, to prevent, detect, and correct the errors before accepting the expenditure. 
V devetih primerih količinsko opredeljivih napak je imela Komisija iz svojih sistemov dovolj informacij (39), da bi lahko te napake preprečila ali odkrila in popravila, preden je sprejela odhodke.
If all this information had been used to correct errors, the estimated level of error would have been 1,7 percentage points lower (40). 
Če bi vse te informacije uporabili za popravo napak, bi bila ocenjena stopnja napake za 1,7 odstotne točke nižja (40).
In addition, 12 transactions affected by a quantifiable error (41) were subject to an audit or expenditure verification. 
Poleg tega je bilo 12 transakcij, na katere je vplivala količinsko opredeljiva napaka(41), revidiranih ali pa je bilo v zvezi z njimi opravljeno preverjanje odhodkov.
The information provided in the audit or verification reports on the actual work done did not allow us to assess whether the errors could have been detected and corrected by these ex-ante checks. 
Z informacijami iz revizijskih poročil ali poročil o preverjanju o dejansko opravljenem delu Sodišče ni moglo oceniti, ali bi bilo napake mogoče odkrili in popravili s temi predhodnimi pregledi.
Non-quantifiable errors related to estimated instead of actual costs (three transactions), shortcomings in the procurement procedures followed (two transactions), insufficient documents (one transaction), and expenditure not covered by the contract (one transaction). 
Količinsko neopredeljive napake so se nanašale na uporabo ocenjenih namesto dejanskih stroškov (tri transakcije), pomanjkljivosti v uporabljenih postopkih javnega naročanja (dve transakciji), nezadostno dokumentacijo (ena transakcija) in odhodke, ki niso bili vključeni v pogodbo (ena transakcija).
Budget support 35. 
Proračunska podpora 35.
(38) “Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger”. 
(38) Med letoma 1990 in 2015 prepoloviti delež ljudi, ki trpijo zaradi lakote.
(39) On the basis of supporting documentation and mandatory checks. 
(39) Na podlagi dokazil in obveznih pregledov.
(40) For 0,3 % (three cases) the Commission committed the error itself and for 1,4 % (six cases) the error was made by beneficiaries. 
(40) V 0,3 % (trije primeri) je napako naredila Komisija sama, v 1,4 % (šest primerov) pa so napako naredili upravičenci.
(41) Contributing 1,3 percentage points to the estimated level of error. 
(41) K ocenjeni stopnji napake je prispevala 1,3 odstotne točke.
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal of the European Union C 375/305 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Examination of annual activity reports and other elements of internal control systems 36. 
13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/305 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA Preučitev letnih poročil o dejavnostih in drugih elementov sistemov notranje kontrole 36.
In May 2013, DG DEVCO adopted an action plan to address weaknesses in the implementation of its own control system (42). 
Maja 2013 je GD DEVCO sprejel akcijski načrt za obravnavanje slabosti, ki so bile ugotovljene pri delovanju njegovega kontrolnega sistema (42).
We reviewed the progress of the action plan and obtained evidence that 19 actions had been fully implemented and four were ongoing at the end of 2015. 
Sodišče je pregledalo napredek pri izpolnjevanju akcijskega načrta in pridobilo dokaze, da je bilo 19 ukrepov izvedenih v celoti, štirje pa so se ob koncu leta 2015 še izvajali.
In July 2015, DG DEVCO adopted a new action plan following the third consecutive year of a reservation expressed by the Director General in the 2014 annual activity report. 
GD DEVCO je julija 2015 sprejel nov akcijski načrt, potem ko je generalni direktor v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2014 že tretje leto zapored izrekel pridržek.
The new action plan contains specific measures targeting high-risk areas: indirect management with international organisations and direct management through grants. 
Nov akcijski načrt vsebuje posebne ukrepe, usmerjene v področja z visokim tveganjem: posredno upravljanje z mednarodnimi organizacijami in neposredno upravljanje z nepovratnimi sredstvi.
Progress on implementing the new action plan will be assessed in next year’s annual report. 
Napredek pri izvajanju novega akcijskega načrta bo ocenjen v naslednjem letnem poročilu.
As in previous years, the frequency of the errors found, including some affecting final claims which had been subject to ex-ante external audits and expenditure verifications, point to weaknesses in these checks. 
Pogostost odkritih napak, vključno z napakami, ki vplivajo na končne zahtevke, za katere so bile opravljene predhodne zunanje revizije in preverjanja odhodkov, kot v prejšnjih letih kaže na slabosti v teh pregledih.
In our last annual report, we reported on the measures already taken by DG DEVCO to improve the quality of these audits and verifications (43). 
Sodišče je v svojem zadnjem letnem poročilu poročalo o ukrepih, ki jih je GD DEVCO že sprejel za izboljšanje kakovosti teh revizij in preverjanj(43).
In February 2016 DG DEVCO put in place a quality grid (44) to assess the reliability of checks. 
Februarja 2016 je GD DEVCO pripravil tabelo za oceno kakovosti(44) za oceno zanesljivosti pregledov.
This tool will be mandatory for audits and verifications contracted by DG DEVCO after 1 January 2016. 
To orodje bo obvezno za revizije in preverjanja, ki jih bo GD DEVCO naročil po 1. januarju 2016.
However, it is not yet designed to be used for audits and expenditure verifications done by local audit companies directly contracted by beneficiaries (45), where the risk of insufficient quality is assessed to be higher. 
Ni pa še zasnovano za uporabo za revizije in preverjanja odhodkov, ki jih opravljajo lokalne revizijske družbe in jih naročijo neposredno upravičenci (45), pri katerih je po ocenah tveganje nezadostne kakovosti višje.
Furthermore, audit and verification reports do not contain sufficient information on the actual work done to enable the grid to be used effectively. 
Poleg tega revizijska poročila in poročila o preverjanju ne vsebujejo dovolj informacij o dejansko opravljenem delu, s katerimi bi bilo mogoče tabelo za oceno kakovosti uspešno uporabljati.
(42) See DG DEVCO’s 2013 annual activity report, pp. 188-190 and 195-196. 
(42) Glej letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD DEVCO za leto 2013, str. 188–190, 195 in 196.
(43) (a) risk analysis made compulsory for the preparation of annual audit plans by EU delegations and DG DEVCO departments; (b) grant contract templates revised so that auditors can be selected or contracted directly by DG DEVCO; (c) awareness-raising about the most common types of error, training and reinforcing of the financial and control skills of DG DEVCO staff and beneficiaries. 
(43) (a) obvezna za analizo tveganja za pripravo letnih revizijskih načrtov za delegacije EU in oddelke GD DEVCO; (b) popravljene predloge pogodb o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev, tako da lahko revizorje izbere ali najame neposredno GD DEVCO; (c) ozaveščanje o najpogostejših vrstah napake, usposabljanje in okrepitev finančne in nadzorne usposobljenosti zaposlenih v GD DEVCO in upravičencev.
(44) The quality grid is a tool used to assess the assurance provided by an audit or expenditure verification engagement regarding the eligibility and correct use of funding. 
(44) Tabela za oceno kakovosti je orodje za oceno zagotovila, ki ga da revizija ali preverjanje odhodkov v zvezi z upravičenostjo in pravilno porabo sredstev.
It aims to ensure that accepted reports are of sufficient quality. 
Namenjena je zagotavljanju, da so sprejeta poročila so dovolj kakovostna.
EN C 375/306 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 40. DG DEVCO has also developed a new audit application which became operational in the second half of 2015 and has the capacity to improve the monitoring and follow-up of findings detected by audits and verifications contracted by DG DEVCO. 
C 375/306 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 40. GD DEVCO je razvil tudi novo revizijsko aplikacijo, ki je začela delovati v drugi polovici leta 2015 in bi lahko izboljšala nadzor in spremljanje ugotovitev revizij in preverjanj, ki jih naroči GD DEVCO.
As with the quality grid, the new application does not cover audits and verifications contracted directly by beneficiaries, for which the current monitoring system does not enable DG DEVCO to obtain reliable information about aggregate costs and results. 
Kot tabela za oceno kakovosti tudi nova aplikacija ne vključuje revizij in preverjanj, ki jih naročijo neposredno upravičenci, za katere GD DEVCO s sedanjim sistemom spremljanja ne more pridobiti zanesljivih informacij o skupnih stroških in rezultatih.
In the areas of document management and procurement, DG DEVCO has put in place a number of measures aimed at improving the situation both for the Commission and for beneficiaries(46). 
GD DEVCO je na področjih upravljanja dokumentov in javnega naročanja uvedel vrsto ukrepov, namenjenih izboljšanju razmer za Komisijo in upravičence(46).
However, the absence of supporting documents and non-compliance with procurement rules are still the main contributing factors to the estimated level of error. 
Toda to, da ni bilo dokazil in da se niso upoštevala pravila za javno naročanje, sta še vedno glavna dejavnika za ocenjeno stopnjo napake.
2015 residual error rate (RER) study 42. 
Študija stopnje preostale napake (RER) za leto 2015 42.
In 2015 DG DEVCO carried out its fourth RER study to 42. estimate the level of error which has evaded all management for expenditure verifications directly contracted by the beneficiaries. checks to prevent, detect and correct errors. 
GD DEVCO je leta 2015 izvedel svojo četrto študijo stopnje preostale napake, da bi ocenil stopnjo napake, ki je ostala kljub vsem upravnim pregledom za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in popravljanje napak. 42.
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES DG DEVCO is going to apply a quality assurance system also in the terms of reference for types of engagements, DG DEVCO will first revise these terms of reference. 
Ker pa so pomanjkljivosti v sistemu delno povezane s pomanjkljivostmi v pravilniku za te vrste poslov, bo GD DEVCO najprej revidiral ta pravila.
The revision of the terms of reference will include, in addition to reinforced quality requirements, a clearer focus on useful results for assurance purposes. 
Revizija pravil bo poleg okrepljenih zahtev glede kakovosti vključevala jasnejše osredotočanje na uporabne rezultate za namene zagotovil.
The study consisted of an examination of a representative sample of transactions relating to contracts closed between September 2014 and August 2015. 
Študija je zajemala preučitev reprezentativnega vzorca transakcij, povezanih s pogodbami, zaključenimi med septembrom 2014 in avgustom 2015.
The results are presented in the AAR (47). 
Rezultati so predstavljeni v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih(47).
The study estimates the RER at 2,20 %, i.e. above the 2 % materiality level set by the Commission. 
V študiji je stopnja preostale napake ocenjena na 2,20%, to je nad stopnjo pomembnosti, ki jo je določila Komisija in znaša 2 %.
Following a recommendation made in our 2013 annual report (48), the AAR disclosed the scope of the RER study and its limitations compared with an audit engagement (49). of the European Union C 375/307 THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 43. 
V skladu s priporočilom, ki ga je v letnem poročilu za leto 2013 izreklo Sodišče (48), so v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih razkriti obseg študije stopnje preostale napake ter njene omejitve v primerjavi z revizijo (49). 43.
The Commission is considering this possibility. 
Komisija razmišlja o tej možnosti.
However, given the substantial amount of expenditure verifications implemented, the limited possibilities for follow-up and the investment in resources needed for monitoring them, DG DEVCO needs to assess first the costs and benefits of including them in the new audit application. 
Vendar mora GD DEVCO glede na visoko število opravljenih preverjanj odhodkov, omejene možnosti za nadaljnje ukrepanje in naložbe v sredstva, potrebna za njihovo spremljanje, najprej oceniti stroške in koristi njihove vključitve v novo revizijsko aplikacijo.
The Commission appreciates the Court’s acknowledgment of the measures put in place. 
Komisija pozdravlja in ceni, da je Sodišče priznalo sprejete ukrepe.
The measures incorporated in revised contract and procurement templates will only gradually be visible in the Court’s audit, in line with the increase of commitments based on those revised templates, in the Court’s sample of transactions. 
Ukrepi, vključeni v revidirano pogodbo in predloge za naročila, bodo le postopoma opazni pri reviziji Sodišča, v skladu s povečanjem obveznosti na podlagi teh popravljenih predlog v vzorcu transakcij Računskega sodišča.