natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S The Commission notes that for the third consecutive year, the level of error remains well below those reported by the Court in the period 2006-2008. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E Komisija ugotavlja, da stopnja napake tretje leto zapored ostaja krepko pod ravnmi, o katerih je poročalo Sodišče za obdobje 2006–2008.
This positive development derives from the reinforced control provisions of the 2007-2013 programming period and its strict policy of interruptions/suspensions when deficiencies are ident­ ified, in line with its 2008 Action Plan. 
Ta pozitiven razvoj izhaja iz okrepljenih kontrolnih postopkov za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 in stroge politike Komisije glede prekinitev/ začasnih ustavitev, če se odkrijejo pomanj­ kljivosti, kar je v skladu z akcijskim načrtom za leto 2008.
As shown in Table 1.3, the combined most likely error for regional policy, transport, energy and employment and social affairs also decreased considerably compared to 2010, from 7,7 % to 5,1 %. 1.15. 
Kot prikazuje tabela 1.3, se je skupna najverjetnejša stopnja napake na področju regionalne politike, energetike in prometa ter zaposlovanja in socialnih zadev v primerjavi z letom 2010 znatno zmanjšala s 7,7 % na 5,1 %.
After taking into account the new valuation of cross-compliance errors in agriculture, the Commission notes the most likely error estimated by the Court is very close to that of 2010 despite a number of adverse technical and structural factors (EU multiannual programmes entering a critical phase with increasing complex payments necessarily more prone to errors). _____________ (9) In contrast to previous years, failure to meet cross-compliance obligations by recipients of payments under the CAP has been included in the calculation of the most likely error. 
1.15 Po upoštevanju novega vrednotenja napak navzkrižne sklad­ nosti na področju kmetijstva Komisija ugotavlja, da je najverjetnejša stopnja napake, ki jo je ocenilo Sodišče, zelo blizu napake iz leta 2010, kljub številnim negativnim tehničnim in strukturnim dejav­ nikom (vstop večletnih programov EU v kritično fazo s povečanjem kompleksnih plačil, v kateri so napake še posebej pogoste). _____________ (9) Za razliko od prejšnjih let je bilo v izračun najverjetnejše stopnje napake vključeno neizpolnjevanje obveznosti navzkrižne skladnosti pri prejemnikih plačil v okviru skupne kmetijske politike.
The errors found represent around 0,1 percentage point of the most likely error estimated by the Court for payments as a whole (see paragraph 3.9, second indent, paragraph 3.13, paragraph 4.9, second indent, and paragraphs 4.16 to 4.18). 
Ugoto­ vljene napake znašajo približno 0,1 odstotne točke najverjetnejše stopnje napake za plačila kot celoto, kot jo je ocenilo Sodišče (glej drugo alineo odstavka 3.9, odstavek 3.13, drugo alineo odstavka 4.9 in odstavke 4.16 do 4.18).
The errors found represent around 0,2 percentage points of the total most likely error. (2) In contrast to previous years, failure to meet cross-compliance obligations by recipients of payments under the CAP has been included in the calculation of the most likely error. 
Ugotovljene napake znašajo približno 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 (1) Za razliko od prejšnjih let je bilo v izračun najverjetnejše stopnje napake vključeno neizpolnjevanje obveznosti navzkrižne skladnosti (glej skupne najverjetnejše stopnje napake.
The errors found represent around 0,1 percentage point of the most likely error estimated by the Court for payments as a whole (see also footnote 1). 7 Free from material error Free from material error 44 Affected by material error Affected by material error Audit conclusions Affected by material error 
(2) Za razliko od prejšnjih let je bilo v izračun najverjetnejše stopnje napake vključeno neizpolnjevanje obveznosti navzkrižne skladnosti 0,1 odstotne točke najverjetnejše stopnje napake za plačila kot celoto, kot jo je ocenilo Sodišče (glej tudi opombo 1).
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/23 EN C 344/24 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Reliability of Commission management representations Introduction 1.16. 
SL C 344/24 Uradni list Evropske unije 12.11.2012 U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Zanesljivost poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije Uvod 1.16 V skladu s členom 317 PDEU je za izvrševanje prora­ čuna EU dokončno odgovorna Komisija.
A keystone of the Commission’s present system for managing EU funds (which was revised thoroughly on the basis of a reform launched in April 2000 (10) in response to a resolution adopted by the European Parlia­ ment (11)) is the responsibility of the directors-general. 
Sedanji sistem Komi­ sije za upravljanje sredstev EU (ki je bil temeljito prenovljen z reformo, uvedeno aprila 2000(10), po sprejetju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta (11)) temelji na odgovornosti generalnih direktorjev.
The latter must put in place effective supervisory and control systems which meet pre-defined standards (12). 
Ti morajo vzpostaviti uspešne nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme, ki dosegajo vnaprej določene standarde (12).
1.17. TheCommission’sdirectors-generalreportannually on the performance of their duties in activity reports(13). 
1.17 Generalni direktorji Komisije vsako leto poročajo o opravljanju svojih nalog v poročilih o dejavnostih (13).
These are accompanied by declarations inter alia on the extent to which resources have been used for their intended purpose, and control procedures ensure the legality and regu­ larity of transactions. 
Tem so priložene izjave, v katerih je med drugim navedeno, v kolikšnem obsegu so bila sredstva porabljena za načrtovane namene in v kolikšnem obsegu kontrolni postopki zagotavljajo zakonitost in pravilnost transakcij.
When they identify significant problems in these respects directors-general may include reservations in their declarations. 1.18. 
Če generalni direktorji pri tem odkrijejo večje težave, lahko v svoje izjave vključijo pri­ držke.
TheCommissionassumespoliticalresponsibilityfor management by its directors-general through the synthesis report. This report draws on representations provided by directors-general in their annual activity reports, as well as on other sources, such as the overall opinion of the internal auditor. 
1.18 Komisija prevzame politično odgovornost za poslovo­ denje svojih generalnih direktorjev v zbirnem poročilu, ki temelji na njihovih predstavitvah v njihovih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih in drugih virih, kot je skupno mnenje notranjega revizorja.
The report also describes the measures taken by the Commission to address management and control deficiencies. _____________ (10) White Paper ‘Reforming the Commission’, COM(2000) 200 final of 5.4.2000. 
V poročilu so poleg tega opisani ukrepi, ki jih je Komisija sprejela za odpravljanje pomanjkljivosti pri upra­ vljanju in kontroliranju. _____________ (10) Reforming the Commission – A White Paper (bela knjiga o reformi Komisije), COM(2000) 200 final z dne 5.4.2000.
(11) European Parliament resolution of 19 January 2000 on action to be taken on the second report of the Committee of Independent Experts on reform of the Commission (OJ C 304, 24.10.2000, p. 
(11) Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. januarja 2000 o ukre­ pih, ki jih je treba sprejeti na podlagi drugega poročila odbora neodvisnih strokovnjakov o reformi Komisije (UL C 304, 24.10.2000, str.
(12) The Commission’s internal control standards are largely inspired by the COSO principles. 
(12) Standardi Komisije v zvezi z notranjo kontrolo se močno zgledu­ jejo po načelih COSO.
COSO is a voluntary private-sector organisation dedicated to improving the quality of financial management and reporting through business ethics, effective internal controls and corporate governance. 
COSO je prostovoljna organizacija zaseb­ nega sektorja, katere cilj je doseganje večje kakovosti finančnega poslovodenja in poročanja s poslovno etiko, uspešnimi notranjimi kontrolami in upravljanjem družb.
(13) The term ‘director-general’ is used in the broad sense of persons responsible. 
(13) Izraz „generalni direktor“ je uporabljen v širšem pomenu in ozna­ čuje odgovorne osebe.
In fact, the 48 declarations have been signed by 1 secretary-general, 36 directors-general, 7 directors and 4 heads of service. 
Dejanski podpisniki 48 izjav so bili 1 gene­ ralni sekretar, 36 generalnih direktorjev, 7 direktorjev in 4 vodje služb.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/25 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Annual activity reports and declarations by directors-general (14) Increased amount of payments under reservation 1.19. Although all directors-general declared that the control procedures put in place give the necessary guarantees concerning the regularity of transactions, the number of direc­ torates-general or services which have issued one or more reservations increased to 16 in 2011 (2010: 13). 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/25 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Letna poročila o dejavnostih in izjave generalnih direktorjev (14) Povečan znesek plačil, za katera veljajo pridržki 1.19 Čeprav so vsi generalni direktorji izjavili, da uvedeni kontrolni postopki dajejo potrebna jamstva za pravilnost tran­ sakcij, se je število generalnih direktoratov ali služb, ki so izrekli vsaj en pridržek, leta 2011 povečalo na 16 (2010: 13).
The total number of reservations increased to 27 in 2011 (2010: 17), the majority of which, as in previous years, refer to weaknesses concerning the regularity of transactions. 
Skupno število pridržkov se je leta 2011 povečalo na 27 (2010: 17), večina pa se jih je tako kot v prejšnjih letih nanašalo na slabosti v zvezi s pravilnostjo transakcij.
The estimated total financial impact of reservations increased to 1 959 million euro or 1,5 % of the payments made in 2011 (2010: 423 million euro or 0,3 %) (see Table 1.4 and Chapters 2 to 9). _____________ (14) Performance aspects of the annual activity reports are treated in Chapter 10. 
Ocenjen skupni finančni učinek pridržkov se je povečal na 1 959 mili­ jonov EUR ali 1,5 % plačil v letu 2011 (2010: 423 milijonov EUR ali 0,3 %) (glej tabelo 1.4 in poglavja 2 do 9). _____________ (14) Vidik smotrnosti poslovanja iz letnih poročil o dejavnostih je obravnavan v poglavju 10.
EN C 344/26 Official Journal of the European Union Table 1.4 — Reservations issued by Commission's directorates-general for 2011 AGRI BUDG CLIMA COMM EACEA EMPL ENER ENTR HOME INFSO MARE MOVE REA REGIO RTD SANCO (1) For the full list of Commission's DGs/services please see http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-390600.htm (2) Source: 2011 consolidated accounts. 
SL C 344/26 Uradni list Evropske unije Tabela 1.4 – Pridržki, ki so jih generalni direktorati Komisije izrazili za leto 2011 AGRI BUDG CLIMA COMM EACEA EMPL ENER ENTR HOME INFSO MARE MOVE REA REGIO RTD SANCO (1) Za celoten seznam služb/GD Komisije glej http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-390600.htm. (2) Vir: konsolidirani računovodski izkazi za leto 2011.
(3) Source: 2011 annual activity reports. 
(3) Vir: letna poročila o dejavnostih za leto 2011.
REGIO and REA have indicated minimum and maximum amounts. 
REGIO in REA sta navedla najnižje in najvišje zneske.
12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/27 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 1.20. Theincreasesinthenumberofreservations,direc­ torates-general concerned and financial impact estimated reflect the recognition, by the directors-general, of a high risk of error in some areas, such as rural development, cohesion or the 7th Framework Programme (FP7). 
12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/27 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 1.20 Povečanještevilapridržkov,številageneralnihdirekto­ ratov, ki so jih izrazili, in ocenjenega finančnega učinka kaže, da se generalni direktorji zavedajo visokega tveganja napake na nekaterih področjih, kot so razvoj podeželja, kohezija ali 7. okvirni program (OP7).
This also corroborates the Court’s audit results for 2011 (see paragraphs 1.10 to 1.15). 
To potrjuje tudi rezultate revizije, ki jo je Sodišče izvedlo za leto 2011 (glej odstavke 1.10 do 1.15).
Each directorate-general is required to assess the extent to which transactions remain affected by error after the operation of supervisory and control systems. 
Komisija oceni „stopnjo preostale napake“ 1.21 Vsak generalni direktorat mora oceniti, v kolikšnem obsegu po uporabi nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov na tran­ sakcije še vedno vplivajo napake.
This can be done by calculating a residual error rate (RER). 
To se lahko stori z izra­ čunom stopnje preostale napake.
In the simplest terms the RER is the error rate obtained from an examination of a representative sample of transactions less any corrections resulting from the supervisory and control systems. 
Najbolj preprosto povedano je stopnja preostale napake stopnja napake, ki jo dobimo pri pregledu reprezentativnega vzorca transakcij, če odštejemo vse popravke, ki so rezultat uporabe nadzornih in kontrolnih siste­ mov.
If the RER exceeds 2 %, the director-general must include a reservation in the declaration which is included in the annual activity report. 1.22. 
Če stopnja preostale napake presega 2 %, mora generalni direktor v izjavi, ki je del letnega poročila o dejavnostih, izra­ ziti pridržek.
This led to an improvement in some declarations, in particular for the cohesion directorates-general (see paragraphs 5.66 and 6.25) and the Directorates-General for Research and Innovation and for the Information Society and Media (see paragraphs 8.35 to 8.36). 
Posle­ dica tega je bilo izboljšanje nekaterih izjav, zlasti izjav gene­ ralnih direktoratov za kohezijo (glej odstavka 5.66 in 6.25), Generalnega direktorata za raziskave in inovacije ter General­ nega direktorata za informacijsko družbo in medije (glej odstavka 8.35 in 8.36).
However, the Court found weak­ nesses in these instructions and their implementation. 
Vendar je Sodišče v teh navodilih in pri njihovi uporabi ugotovilo slabosti.
Some directorates-general provided unclear information and/or underestimated RERs, which meant that they failed to make reservations or understated their seriousness (15). 
Nekateri generalni direk­ torati so navedli nejasne informacije in/ali podcenili stopnje preostale napake, kar je pomenilo, da niso izrazili pridržkov ali da so podcenjevali njihovo resnost (15).
For example: — the guidance did not sufficiently explain what to do when it was not possible to calculate a reliable RER; — amounts were included in the calculation although, due to long delays, they had not been received or otherwise recovered; T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 1.20. The Commission has reported its analysis of the various reasons behind this increase in the Synthesis report for 2011. 
Na primer: — v smernicah ni bilo dovolj pojasnjeno, kaj je treba storiti, kadar ni mogoče izračunati zanesljive stopnje preostale napake, — v izračun so bili zajeti tudi zneski, ki zaradi velikih zamud še niso bili prejeti ali drugače izterjani, O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 1.20 Komisija je analizo različnih razlogov za povečanje stopnje napak objavila v zbirnem poročilu za leto 2011.
These are outlined in paragraph 1.27 below. 
Razlogi so podani v odstavku 1.27 spodaj.
For regional policy, the increase in the number of reservations is mainly due to the application of a stricter methodology in particular by assessing the cumulative residual risk, to address observations made by the Court in its former Annual Reports. 
Na področju regionalne politike je povečanje števila pridržkov v glavnem posledica uporabe strožje metodologije, zlasti z oceno skupnega preostalega tveganja, pri obravnavi opažanj Sodišča iz prejšnjih letnih poročil.
For the first year, programmes are put under reservation when the cumulative residual risk is above 2 %. 
Prvo leto so za programe izraženi pridržki, če je skupno preostalo tveganje višje od 2 %.
The examination of a representative sample of transactions typically requires an audit effort which is beyond the means of direc­ torate-generals and services outside the four main expending areas (agriculture, Structural Funds, external aid and research). 
1.21 Pregled reprezentativnega vzorca transakcij običajno zahteva revizijo v obsegu, ki presega sredstva generalnih direktoratov in služb zunaj štirih glavnih področij odhodkov (kmetijstvo, strukturni skladi, zunanja pomoč in raziskave).
The AAR standing instructions provide extensive guidance on how to provide assurance when the available control indicators are not statistically representative of the transaction population. 
Veljavna navodila za pripravo letnega poročila o dejavnostih zagotavljajo obširne smernice o tem, kako dati zagotovilo, ko razpoložljivi kontrolni kazalniki niso statistično repre­ zentativni za populacijo transakcij.
For cohesion policy the regulations provide that Member States audit representative samples of transactions for programmes or groups of programmes each year. 
Na področju kohezijske politike predpisi določajo, da morajo države članice vsako leto revidirati repre­ zentativne vzorce transakcij za programe ali skupine programov.
The resulting error rates are then reviewed and confirmed by the Commission services and used for their assurance process. 1.22. 
Ugotovljene stopnje napak nato pregledajo in potrdijo službe Komisije ter jih uporabijo pri postopku dajanja zagotovil.
The Commission welcomes the acknowledgement of its improved guidance as a response to the Court’s recommendations made in its 2010 Annual Report. 
1.22 Komisija izraža zadovoljstvo ob potrditvi izboljšanih smernic kot odgovor na priporočila Sodišča v njegovem poročilu za leto 2010.
It considers that the DGs referred to by the Court followed the instructions and made appropriate reservations. — The AAR instructions include specific, step-by-step guidance on how to proceed in case this information is not available. — In line with the Commission’s instructions, only financial corrections that were officially agreed by national authorities and recorded by the Certifying Authority in their books were taken into consideration when calculating the residual error rate. 
Komisija meni, da so generalni direktorati, na katere se sklicuje Sodišče, sledili navodilom in izrekli primerne pridržke. — Navodila za pripravo letnega poročila o dejavnostih vključujejo specifične smernice po korakih o tem, kako ravnati, če te infor­ macije niso na voljo. — V skladu z navodili Komisije so bili za izračun stopnje preostale napake upoštevani samo finančni popravki, o katerih so se nacio­ nalni organi uradno dogovorili in jih je v svojih računovodskih knjigah evidentiral organ za potrjevanje.
Provided that these requirements are met, the Commission ensures that all agreed financial corrections are deducted from the next payment claim submitted by the relevant authorities. _____________ (15) See paragraphs 3.40 to 3.41, 4.48 to 4.50, 5.67 to 5.69, 6.24 to 6.26 and 7.25. 
Pod pogojem, da so te zahteve izpolnjene, Komisija zagotavlja, da so vsi dogovorjeni finančni popravki odšteti od naslednjega zahtevka za plačilo, ki ga predložijo ustrezni organi. _____________ (15) Glej odstavke 3.40 in 3.41, 4.48 do 4.50, 5.67 do 5.69, 6.24 do 6.26 ter 7.25.
EN 16). 
SL 1. 2. 16).
Furthermore, the instructions also foresaw suspensions to be included. 1.23. 
Poleg tega je bilo v navodilih predvideno, da se zajamejo tudi začasne ustavitve plačil.
The Court concludes that the RER is not yet a reliable indicator of the extent to which transactions remain affected by error. 
1.23 Sodišče je prišlo do zaključka, da stopnja preostale napake še ni zanesljiv kazalnik obsega, v katerem napake še vedno vplivajo na transakcije.
In the introduction to the synthesis report (17), the Commission takes overall political responsibility for management of the EU budget primarily based on the assurances and reservations in the AARs from directors-general and heads of service. 
Zbirno poročilo Komisije 1.24 Komisija v uvodu zbirnega poročila (17) na podlagi zagotovil in pridržkov generalnih direktorjev in vodij služb v njihovih letnih poročilih o delu prevzema splošno politično odgovornost za upravljanje proračuna EU.
The Commission notes that they all give reasonable assurance concerning the regularity of the underlying trans­ actions. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da vsa dajejo razumno zago­ tovilo o pravilnosti osnovnih transakcij.
The Court has noticed improvements in some AARs recognising a high risk of error and providing quantitative indicators for measuring regularity of transactions (see para­ graphs 1.20 and 1.22). However, the Court emphasises that issues previously identified remain unresolved (see paragraph 1.22 and Annex 1.2, paragraph 2). 
Sodišče je opazilo izboljšanja v nekaterih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih, ki priznavajo visoko tveganje napake in navajajo kvantitativne kazalnike za merjenje pravilnosti transakcij (glej odstavka 1.20 in 1.22), vendar poudarja, da prej opredeljene zadeve ostajajo nerešene (glej odstavek 1.22 in odstavek 2 Priloge 1.2).
1.26. Thesynthesisreportalsodrawsonthesecondoverall opinion issued by the Commission’s Internal Auditor. 
1.26 Zbirno poročilo temelji tudi na drugem skupnem mnenju, ki ga je izdal notranji revizor Komisije.
The overall opinion is based on the work carried out from 2009 to 2011 by the IAS and the Internal Audit Capabilities as well as the assurance given in the AARs for 2011 by senior management. 
Skupno mnenje temelji na delu, ki so ga med letoma 2009 in 2011 opravili služba in oddelki za notranjo revizijo, ter na zagoto­ vilu, ki ga je v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih za leto 2011 podalo višje poslovodstvo.
Compared to last year, the overall opinion has improved by providing more detail on the matters raised. 
V primerjavi s prejšnjim letom se je skupno mnenje izboljšalo, saj vsebuje več podrobnosti o obravnavanih zadevah.
The opinion remains positive, building in most cases on the same reservations as contained in the AARs. 
Mnenje ostaja pozitivno in se večinoma zanaša na enake pridržke, kot so navedeni v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih.
The Court considers that the issues identified by the Internal Auditor as requiring further attention — such as the weaknesses in the external aid area (18) — should be appropriately addressed by the direc­ torates-general concerned. _____________ (16) See paragraphs 1.32 to 1.50 of the Court’s 2009 Annual Report. 
Sodišče meni, da bi morali generalni direktorati ustrezno obravnavati zadeve, ki po mnenju notranjega revi­ zorja zahtevajo dodatno pozornost, kot so slabosti na področju zunanje pomoči (18). _____________ (16) Glej odstavke 1.32 do 1.50 letnega poročila Sodišča za leto 2009.
(17) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors — Synthesis of the Commission’s management achievements in 2011, COM(2012) 281 final of 6.6.2012. 
(17) Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Računskemu sodišču – Zbirno poročilo o dosežkih Komisije pri upravljanju v letu 2011, COM(2012) 281 final, 6.6.2012.
(18) Information about the overall quality of financial management is absent in the external aid DGs, but no reservation has been provided for this (see paragraph 7.25 and paragraphs 52 to 53 in the 2011 EDF Annual Report). of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S — The Commission agrees that suspensions should not be included in the residual error rate calculation and no directorate-general has done so. 1.23. 
(18) V generalnih direktoratih, ki upravljajo zunanjo pomoč, ni infor­ macij o splošni kakovosti finančnega poslovodenja, vendar ni bil za to izražen noben pridržek (glej odstavek 7.25 ter odstavka 52 in 53 letnega poročila o dejavnostih ERS za leto 2011). O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E — Komisija soglaša, da se začasne ustavitve plačil ne vključijo v izračun stopnje preostale napake, in tega ni storil noben generalni direktorat.
The Commission acknowledges that wider and more consistent use of the RER indicator is desirable. 
1.23 Komisija se strinja, da je zaželena širša in bolj skladna uporaba kazalnika stopnje preostale napake.