natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1 ‘As regards the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), significant synergies have already been obtained by harmonising and aligning management and control rules for the first pillar (European Agricultural Guarantee Fund — EAGF) and the second pillar (EAFRD) of the CAP. 
1 „Glede skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) so bile s prilagajanjem in usklajevanjem pravil upravljanja in nadzora za prvi (Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad – EKJS) in drugi steber (EKSRP) SKP dosežene znatne sinergije.
The strong link between the EAGF and the EAFRD should therefore be maintained and the structures already in place in the Member States preserved.’ 
Močna povezava med EKJS in EKSRP bi se zato morala ohraniti, ohraniti pa bi bilo treba tudi delujoče strukture v državah članicah.“
Reply of the Commission 76 23 Each year the Commission analyses the Annual Control Reports and requests corrective measures in case of material annual error rates or cumulative residual risk (residual risk rates at closure). 
Odgovori Komisije 76 23 Komisija vsako leto analizira letna poročila o kontrolah in v primeru pomembnih letnih stopenj napak ali kumulativnega preostalega tveganja (stopnje preostalega tveganja ob zaključku) zahteva popravljalne ukrepe.
The Commission has also adopted a robust policy of interruptions and suspensions of interim payments where serious deficiencies were found. 
Komisija je sprejela tudi trdno politiko prekinitev in začasnih ustavitev vmesnih plačil v primeru ugotovljenih resnih pomanjkljivosti.
This should reduce the workload at closure as many issues have already been identified and corrected during implementation. 
S tem bi se morala zmanjšati obremenitev ob zaključku, saj je veliko vprašanj ugotovljenih in popravljenih že med izvajanjem.
24 In rural development the closure exercise is a financial clearance exercise of the last execution year. 
24 Na področju razvoja podeželja je zaključevanje finančno potrjevanje zadnjega leta izvajanja.
A final balance is calculated and payable at closure only if all annual accounts of the programming period are cleared (financial clearance). 
Končni znesek se izračuna in plača ob zaključku le, če so potrjeni vsi letni obračuni programskega obdobja (finančna potrditev).
The legality and regularity of EAFRD spending is ensured through the conformity clearance procedure, independently from the closure. If, through the conformity clearance procedure, deficiencies are identified in the management and control of the expenditure, the Commission applies financial corrections for expenditure effected for up to 24 months prior to notification by the Commission, in accordance with Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. 
Zakonitost in pravilnost porabe EKSRP se zagotovita s postopkom potrditve skladnosti, ki je neodvisen od zaključka. Če se s postopkom potrditve skladnosti ugotovijo pomanjkljivosti pri upravljanju in kontroli odhodkov, Komisija v skladu s členom 52 Uredbe (EU) št.
See also Commission’s reply to paragraph 19. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 19.
28 In the case of cohesion funds the annual budgets of the Commission are protected with payment of only 90 % of interim expenditure. 
28 V primeru kohezijskih skladov so letni proračuni Komisije zaščiteni tako, da se plača le 90 % vmesnih odhodkov.
This is comparable to the 95 % rule for EAFRD at the end of the programing period (Article 34 of Regulation 1306/2013). 
To je primerljivo s pravilom o 95 % za EKSRP ob koncu programskega obdobja (člen 34 Uredbe (EU) št.
EAFRD does not have this additional annually cleared pre-financing system and therefore does not need to withhold anything from the interim payments before 95 % implementation. 
EKSRP nima tega dodatnega letno potrjenega sistema predhodnega financiranja in mu zato pred 95-odstotno izvedbo ni treba zadržati nobenega deleža vmesnih plačil.
29 Potential further alignment should respect the need to preserve the consistency between the two pillars of the CAP. 
29 Pri morebitnem dodatnem usklajevanju bi bilo treba upoštevati potrebo po ohranitvi skladnosti med obema stebroma SKP.
See also Commission’s reply to paragraph 20. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 20.
32 For cohesion policy the purpose of closure is already clearly set out in the regulations for the 2014-2020 period. 
32 Na področju kohezijske politike je namen zaključevanja jasno določen že v uredbah za obdobje 2014–2020.
Reply of the Commission 77 33 For cohesion policy the regulation foresees a period of 3 years after the payment of the balance to keep supporting documents and in that period audits can be carried out and consequently financial corrections applied. 
Odgovori Komisije 77 33 V Uredbi je za kohezijsko politiko določeno, da je treba tri leta po plačilu preostalega zneska hraniti podporne dokumente, pri čemer se lahko v tem obdobju izvajajo revizije in posledično uporabijo finančni popravki.
For rural development beneficiaries have the obligations to maintain the co-financed investment for a period of 5 years after the payment or the obligation of Member State to recover unduly spent amounts. 
Na področju razvoja podeželja so upravičenci dolžni sofinancirano naložbo ohraniti pet let po plačilu oziroma so države članice dolžne povrniti neupravičeno porabljene zneske.
The Commission must be in a position to check the compliance with these obligations and impose financial corrections in case of breaches. 
Komisija mora imeti možnost, da preveri izpolnjevanje teh obveznosti in da v primeru kršitev uvede finančne popravke.
It is clearly set out in the guidelines for the closure of the 2007-2013 rural development programmes that the conformity audits continue to be carried out independently from the closure. 
V smernicah o zaključevanju programov za razvoj podeželja v obdobju 2007–2013 je jasno določeno, da se revizije potrditve skladnosti izvajajo še naprej, in to neodvisno od zaključka.
The financial corrections do not influence the calculation of the final balance. 
Finančni popravki ne vplivajo na izračun končnega zneska.
The amounts of the financial corrections are established in Commission's conformity clearance decisions and executed by recovery orders (net financial corrections). 
Zneski finančnih popravkov se določijo v odločitvah Komisije o potrditvi skladnosti in izvršijo z nalogi za izterjavo (neto finančni popravki).
34 For rural development, there is no legal basis to impose financial corrections based on an estimated error rate and in order to reduce the error rate below the level of materiality. 
34 Na področju razvoja podeželja ni pravne podlage za uvedbo finančnih popravkov, ki temeljijo na ocenjeni stopnji napake in s katerimi naj bi se znižala stopnja napake pod stopnjo pomembnosti.
It can only be done by conformity clearance procedure, which the Commission will carry out where appropriate. 
To se lahko doseže le s postopkom potrditve skladnosti, ki ga bo Komisija izvedla, kadar bo to ustrezno.
See also Commission’s reply to paragraph 36. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 36.
35 For cohesion policy, the Commission is calculating the cumulative residual risk throughout the programming period, thus allowing for the reduction of the risk of errors below the materiality level at any moment in time during the programming period. 
35 Na področju kohezijske politike Komisija izračuna kumulativno preostalo tveganje v celotnem programskem obdobju in s tem omogoči, da se tveganje napake v katerem koli trenutku programskega obdobja zmanjša pod stopnjo pomembnosti.
The audit authorities are requested to disclose the residual risk rate at closure and, where material, programme authorities are requested to take the necessary additional financial corrections before submitting their final closure declaration. 
Revizijski organi morajo ob zaključku razkriti stopnjo preostalega tveganja. Če je ta pomembna, morajo organi, pristojni za programe, pred predložitvijo končne izjave o zaključitvi izvesti potrebne dodatne finančne popravke.
36 In the current legal framework for rural development, conformity clearance decisions can continue to be taken even after the closure of the programme. 
36 V sedanjem pravnem okviru za razvoj podeželja se lahko odločitve o potrditvi skladnosti še naprej sprejemajo tudi po zaključku programa.
Therefore, the concept of a ‘residual risk rate at closure is currently not compatible with the legislation underpinning the second pillar of the CAP. 
Zato pojem stopnje preostalega tveganja ob zaključku zdaj ni združljiv z zakonodajo, na kateri temelji drugi steber SKP.
However, every year the annual activity report of DG AGRI discloses, both the estimated error rates of the transactions between Member States and the beneficiaries and the corrective capacity of the ex post controls and procedures leading to recoveries from beneficiaries and net financial corrections. 
Vendar se v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih GD AGRI vsako leto razkrijeta ocenjena stopnja napake transakcij med državami članicami in upravičenci ter popravna zmogljivost naknadnih kontrol in postopkov za izterjavo od upravičencev in neto finančne popravke.
Comparing the two enables the Commission to conclude on the annual residual risk to the EU budget after all controls and corrections are taken into account. 
Komisija lahko na podlagi njune primerjave sprejme sklep o letnem preostalem tveganju za proračun EU, ko so že upoštevani vsi popravki in kontrole.
The Commission maintains the view expressed in the 2015 annual activity report of DG AGRI. 
Komisija vztraja pri stališču, izraženem v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih GD AGRI za leto 2015.
The situation remains under close scrutiny and the Commission is committed to assist the Member States in combatting the root causes of errors. 
Stanje se še naprej pozorno nadzoruje, Komisija pa je zavezana državam članicam pomagati pri preprečevanju glavnih vzrokov napak.
Reply of the Commission 78 37 Every year the DG AGRI Annual Activity Report discloses an adjusted error rate and an estimated amount at risk for the rural development area. 
Odgovori Komisije 78 37 Vsako leto se v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih GD AGRI razkrijeta prilagojena stopnja napake in ocenjeni obseg tveganja na področju razvoja podeželja.
An adjusted error rate is calculated at Paying Agency level and then aggregated at Activity area. 
Prilagojena stopnja napake se izračuna na ravni plačilne agencije in nato združi na področju dejavnosti.
Under the current rules governing cap expenditure (including rural development), assurance on legality and regularity results from the conformity clearance procedure and not from a calculation of a residual error rate at closure. 
Na podlagi sedanjih pravil, ki urejajo odhodke za SKP (vključno z razvojem podeželja), zagotovilo o zakonitosti in pravilnosti izhaja iz postopka potrditve skladnosti in ne iz izračuna stopnje preostale napake ob zaključku.
The conformity clearance procedure is launched when the total error at the fund level is reported by the certification body as being above materiality. 
Postopek potrditve skladnosti se začne, ko certifikacijski organ sporoči, da je skupna napaka na ravni sklada nad stopnjo pomembnosti.
Financial corrections are applied when the certification bodies’ findings are confirmed. 
Finančni popravki se uporabijo, ko so ugotovitve certifikacijskega organa potrjene.
38 For 2014-2020 programmes, a block of expenditure is certified annually in the accounts which will be subject to an annual acceptance/clearance and to further examination of its legality and regularity. 
38 Za programe za obdobje 2014–2020 se letno potrdi skupina odhodkov v obračunih, ki bodo predmet letnega sprejetja/potrditve in za katere se bo preučilo, ali so zakoniti in pravilni.
Expenditure is no longer certified cumulatively during the programming period and therefore there is no need to calculate a cumulative residual risk rate or to request an audit opinion concerning the whole programming period at closure. 
Odhodki se ne potrjujejo več kumulativno v programskem obdobju, zato ni treba izračunati kumulativne stopnje preostalega tveganja ali zahtevati revizijskega mnenja glede celotnega programskega obdobja ob zaključku.
For the last year of the period, for cohesion the audit authorities will provide their annual residual risk rate and issue their last annual audit opinion based on it. 
Na področju kohezije bodo revizijski organi za zadnje leto obdobja navedli letno stopnjo preostalega tveganja in na podlagi tega izdali svoje zadnje letno revizijsko mnenje.
For Rural Development the certification bodies will provide the error rates and the incompliance rates in their last annual audit opinion. 
Na področju razvoja podeželja bodo certifikacijski organi v svojem zadnjem letnem revizijskem mnenju navedli stopnje napake in stopnje neskladnosti.
39 The European Parliament and the Council are informed in the Annual Activity Reports about the progress of the closure of cohesion and rural development programmes. 
39 Evropski parlament in Svet sta v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih obveščena o napredku zaključevanja programov na področjih kohezije in razvoja podeželja.
40 The Commission underlines that the closure process should serve to clarify and settle all open issues related to control activities and audit findings and considers that the cumulative audit work gathered during the programming period and at closure will provide for a sufficient level of assurance at closure without the need to perform additional audit work thereafter. 
40 Komisija poudarja, da bi moral proces zaključevanja služiti pojasnitvi in rešitvi vseh odprtih vprašanj, povezanih s kontrolnimi dejavnostmi in revizijskimi ugotovitvami, ter meni, da bo s kumulativnim revizijskim delom v programskem obdobju in ob zaključku dosežena ustrezna stopnja zagotovila, ne da bi bilo treba po tem opraviti dodatno revizijsko delo.
Concerning the 2007-2013 period, the audit plan in the last years 2015-2016 is clearly targeted at checking the level of preparation of the Member States for closure focusing on re-performance of audits carried out by audit authorities but also including audits of risky operational programmes and of the reliability of the withdrawals and recoveries reported by Member States. 
Kar zadeva obdobje 2007–2013, je revizijski načrt v zadnjih letih, tj. letih 2015 in 2016, nedvoumno usmerjen v preverjanje stopnje pripravljenosti držav članic na zaključevanje, pri čemer se osredotoča na ponovno opravljanje revizij, ki jih izvajajo revizijski organi, vključuje pa tudi revizije tveganih operativnih programov ter zanesljivosti umikov in izterjav, o katerih poročajo države članice.
Audits after closure are not excluded though, depending on the assessment of any remaining risk following the analysis of closure documents. 
Revizije po zaključku niso izključene in so odvisne od ocene preostalega tveganja po analizi dokumentov o zaključku.
43 The Commission considers that the current set-up of the conformity clearance procedure ensures an adequate protection of the financial interests of the EU budget. 
43 Komisija meni, da sedanja ureditev postopka potrditve skladnosti zagotavlja ustrezno zaščito finančnih interesov proračuna EU.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 24. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 24.
Reply of the Commission 79 46 The Commission considers that the closure process would take much longer and would require much more resources if final reporting and evaluation of the programme, including monitoring and analysis of the achievement of outputs and results for the entire period is to be covered. 
Odgovori Komisije 79 46 Komisija meni, da bi proces zaključevanja trajal veliko dlje in bi bilo zanj potrebnih veliko več virov, če bi moral zajemati končno poročanje o programu in njegovo vrednotenje, vključno s spremljanjem in analizo doseganja izložkov in rezultatov za celotno obdobje.
48 The legal framework in place for cohesion policy 2007-2013 does not allow for conditioning payments on results or achievements. 
48 Pravni okvir, ki velja za kohezijsko politiko v obdobju 2007–2013, ne omogoča pogojevanja plačil z rezultati ali dosežki.
Section 5.2.6 of the closure guidelines requires systematic reporting on indicators by priority axis where achievements diverge by more than 25 % from targets including a justification on why targets were not met and why corrective actions were not taken. 
V oddelku 5.2.6 smernic o zaključevanju je določeno, da je treba sistematično poročati o kazalnikih po prednosti osi, kadar se dosežki za več kot 25 % razlikujejo od ciljev, vključno z utemeljitvijo, zakaj cilji niso bili izpolnjeni in zakaj niso bili sprejeti popravljalni ukrepi.
The outputs and results-oriented approach has been more extensively introduced in the period 2014-2020 for both policy areas (see paragraph 52). 
Pristop, usmerjen k izložkom in rezultatom, je bil za obe področji obsežneje uporabljen v obdobju 2014–2020 (glej odstavek 52).
This approach has been reinforced by the introduction of a performance reserve amounting to 6 % of the programme budget. 
Ta pristop je bil podprt z uvedbo rezerve za uspešnost v višini 6 % proračuna programa.
The performance framework builds indeed on elements of the result orientation. 
Okvir uspešnosti dejansko temelji na elementih usmerjenosti v rezultate.
Its objective is to give incentives to programme and priority managers to deliver what is under their control. 
Njegov cilj je spodbujanje upravljavcev programov in prednostnih nalog, da izvedejo, kar spada v okvir njihove kontrole.
It will reward programmes which progress well towards the objectives through the allocation of the performance reserve, but will also trigger measures for priorities which fail to do so. 
Na tej podlagi se programi, ki dobro napredujejo pri doseganju ciljev, nagradijo z dodelitvijo rezerve za uspešnost, sprožijo pa se tudi ukrepi za prednostne naloge, pri katerih ni napredka.
There are milestones set for these indicators to be achieved by the end of 2018 and targets to be achieved by the end of 2023. 
Določeni so mejniki za doseganje teh kazalnikov do konca leta 2018 in cilji, ki jih je treba izpolniti do konca leta 2023.
Allocation of the reserve is conditional on the achievement of those milestones set at the level of programme priorities (Article 20 and Article 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013). 
Dodelitev rezerve je pogojena z doseganjem navedenih mejnikov, določenih na ravni prednostnih nalog programa (člen 20 in člen 22(2) Uredbe (EU) št.
If targets are not achieved, the Commission may also apply financial corrections with a link of the payments to the actual achievements of the outputs and results. 
Če cilji niso doseženi, lahko Komisija uporabi tudi finančne popravke, ki so povezani s plačili za dejansko doseganje izložkov in rezultatov.
49 The Commission considers that section 3.5 of the closure guidelines clearly explains how to treat uncompleted operations. 
49 Komisija meni, da je v oddelku 3.5 smernic o zaključevanju nedvoumno pojasnjeno, kako obravnavati nekončane projekte.
On the financial consequences of not achieving the targets set in the programmes, the Commission refers to the Questions and Answers on closure2 see replies to questions 200-205, where it explains that the Member State should report in the Final Implementation Report on the programme achievements as measured by physical and financial indicators and should provide information on indicators. 
V zvezi s finančnimi posledicami nedoseganja ciljev, določenih v programih, se Komisija sklicuje na dokument z odgovori in vprašanji o zaključevanju2 (glej odgovore na vprašanja 200–205), kjer pojasnjuje, da bi morale države članice v končnem poročilu o izvajanju poročati o dosežkih programov, kot so bili izmerjeni s fizičnimi in finančnimi kazalniki, ter predložiti informacije o kazalnikih.
And only if there is a significant divergence should an explanation and a justification be provided as requested by the closure guidelines. 
Pojasnitev in utemeljitev bi bilo treba predložiti le v primeru pomembnega odstopanja, kot je določeno v smernicah o zaključevanju.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 48. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 48.
2 http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/guidelines/closure_2007_2013/qa_closure20072013_en.pdf 
2 http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/guidelines/closure_2007_2013/qa_closure20072013_en.pdf.
Reply of the Commission 80 50 The Commission has provided relevant guidance to Member States on the subject, e.g. in the framework of the rural development committee and the evaluation expert group. 
Odgovori Komisije 80 50 Komisija je državam članicam zagotovila ustrezna navodila glede tega vprašanja, na primer v okviru odbora za razvoj podeželja in strokovne skupine za vrednotenje.
51 According to the closure guidelines for cohesion, at the time of submission of the closure documents, Member States have to ensure that all projects included in the programmes closure are functioning, meaning completed and in use. 
51 V skladu s smernicami o zaključevanju na področju kohezije morajo države članice ob predložitvi dokumentov o zaključku zagotoviti, da vsi projekti, ki so zajeti v zaključevanje programov, delujejo, torej da so končani in se uporabljajo.
The Commission makes an exception for the non-functioning projects and phased projects which will be monitored (annexes III, IV and V). 
Komisija zagotavlja izjemo za nedelujoče projekte in projekte, razdeljene v faze, ki se bodo spremljali (priloge III, IV in V).
These will be a complement on the data reported on the achievement of targets. 
Ti bodo dopolnjevali sporočene podatke o izpolnjevanju ciljev.
More specifically, phasing and its concrete implementation has been subject of several replies provided under the ‘questions and answers’ document on closure, closure trainings and specific support provided to the Member States in the context of the task force for better implementation. 
Natančneje, delitev v faze in njeno dejansko izvajanje sta bila predmet več odgovorov v okviru dokumenta z vprašanji in odgovori o zaključevanju, usposabljanj v zvezi z zaključevanjem in posebne podpore za države članice v okviru delovne skupine za boljše izvajanje.
For rural development the reporting on achievements of the targets is done in the last annual progress report (table G.3 submitted by the MS indicates the level of achievement of these targets). 
Na področju razvoja podeželja se o doseganju ciljev poroča v zadnjem letnem poročilu o napredku (v razpredelnici G.3, ki jo predložijo države članice, je prikazana stopnja izpolnjevanja teh ciljev).
The ex post evaluations will take into account these indicators and the achievements of the targets. 
Ti kazalniki in izpolnjevanje ciljev bodo upoštevani v naknadnih vrednotenjih.
52 The Commission refers to its reply in paragraph 48. 
52 Komisija se sklicuje na svoj odgovor v odstavku 48.
The performance framework provides a mechanism for monitoring whether the implementation of the priorities is on track. 
Okvir uspešnosti zajema mehanizem za spremljanje, ali izvajanje prednostnih nalog poteka po načrtu.
The performance reserve provides an incentive to achieve the milestones, which necessarily are the precondition for obtaining the intended results. 
Rezerva za uspešnost zagotavlja spodbudo za doseganje mejnikov, ki so nujen pogoj za doseganje želenih rezultatov.
The performance reserve is only one of the elements supporting an increased focus on results. 
Rezerva za uspešnost je zgolj eden od elementov, ki spodbujajo večjo osredotočenost na rezultate.
The core element of the results orientation is the intervention logic embedded in each programme with the output and result indicators associated. 
Temeljni element osredotočenosti na rezultate je logika posredovanja, ki je del vsakega programa in je povezana s kazalniki izložkov in rezultatov.
The Commission also refers to the observations of Chapter III of the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors for the year 2014. 
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na ugotovitve iz poglavja III letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za leto 2014.
The Commission also notes that the ex post evaluation of the programme is only required by 31 December 2024 (Article 57 R1303/2013). 
Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da se naknadno vrednotenje programa zahteva le do 31. decembra 2024 (člen 57 Uredbe (EU) št.