natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It has two objectives: - to reduce accessibility to terrorist content online; - to empower civil-society partners to increase the volume of effective alternative narratives online. 
Ima dva cilja: – zmanjšati dostopnost terorističnih vsebin na spletu, – opolnomočati partnerje civilne družbe za povečanje količine uspešnih alternativnih diskurzov na spletu.
European Strategic Communications Network The European Strategic Communications Network is a network where EU Member StatesŐ experts share good practices on strategic communications. 
Evropska mreža za strateško komuniciranje Evropska mreža za strateško komuniciranje je mreža, v okviru katere si strokovnjaki držav članic izmenjujejo dobre prakse o strateškem komuniciranju.
Its advisory team provides governments with advice on developing a communication strategy and producing counter-narrative campaigns9. The ŇInternal Security Fund - PoliceÓ provided grants of Ű2.2 million to finance their activities for the period from January 2015 to September 2017. 
Njena svetovalna skupina svetuje vladam pri pripravi komunikacijskih strategij in protipropagandnih kampanj.9 Nepovratna sredstva v višini 2,2 milijona EUR za financiranje dejavnosti mreže od januarja 2015 do septembra 2017 so se zagotavljala iz Sklada za notranjo varnost – Policija.
Inclusive and resilient societies are promoted by means of projects financed by the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ such as STRESAVIORA (see Box 3). 
Vključujoče in odporne družbe se podpirajo s projekti, kot je STRESAVIORA in ki se prav tako financirajo iz Sklada za notranjo varnost – Policija (glej okvir 3).
In addition, projects financed by Erasmus+ and the European Social Fund also aim to strengthen resilience and reach out to disadvantaged communities. 
Poleg tega so krepitvi odpornosti in doseganju prikrajšanih skupnosti namenjeni tudi projekti, financirani iz programa Erasmus+ in Evropskega socialnega sklada.
Although their objectives are much broader and are not specifically designed to address radicalisation, they indirectly help to prevent it. 
Čeprav so cilji teh projektov veliko širši in projekti niso zasnovani posebej za boj proti radikalizaciji, ti projekti posredno prispevajo k njenemu preprečevanju.
9 The European Strategic Communications Network evolved from the Syria Strategic Communications Advisory Team (SSCAT). 
Evropska mreža za strateško komuniciranje se je razvila iz svetovalne skupine za strateško komuniciranje v zvezi s Sirijo. 9
The Commission supports Member States in identifying and dealing with radicalised people by facilitating exchanges of information between Member StatesŐ law enforcement authorities (e.g. through the Schengen Information System). 
Komisija podpira države članice pri odkrivanju in obravnavanju radikaliziranih oseb z omogočanjem izmenjave informacij med organi pregona držav članic (npr. v okviru schengenskega informacijskega sistema).
It also supports the development of exit strategies to help people disengage from radicalised environments and re-integrate into society by means of rehabilitation and de-radicalisation projects funded by the Justice Programme. 
Podpira tudi pripravo strategij izstopa za pomoč posameznikom pri osvoboditvi iz radikaliziranih sredin in ponovno vključitev v družbo s projekti rehabilitacije in de-radikalizacije, ki se financirajo iz programa Pravosodje.
Radicalisation in countries outside Europe is addressed both by dedicated counter-terrorism measures and mainstreaming in other measures. 
Za odzivanje na radikalizacijo v državah zunaj Evrope se uporabljajo namenski protiteroristični ukrepi in vključevanje te teme v druge ukrepe.
This includes programmes financed by the European Development Funds, Erasmus+, the European Neighbourhood Instrument and the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace. 
To vključuje programe, ki se financirajo iz evropskih razvojnih skladov, programa Erasmus+, evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in instrumenta za prispevanje k stabilnosti in miru.
We examined whether the Commission appropriately managed its support for Member States in addressing radicalisation leading to terrorism. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali je Komisija ustrezno upravljala podporo za države članice pri odzivanju na radikalizacijo, ki vodi v terorizem.
The aim was to answer the following questions: Does the Commission provide Member States with relevant support? 
Želelo je odgovoriti na spodnja vprašanja. Ali Komisija zagotavlja ustrezno podporo državam članicam?
In order to answer this question, we assessed whether the CommissionŐs policy objectives and actions were designed in such a way as to reflect Member StatesŐ needs. 
Za odgovor na to vprašanje je Sodišče ocenilo, ali so bili cilji politike Komisije in njeni ukrepi zasnovani tako, da so odražali potrebe držav članic.
12 Box 3 - STRESAVIORA STRESAVIORA I involved researchers who identified the need for young people to become more resilient, express their own opinions, engage in debate, and stand up for themselves. 
13 Okvir 3 – STRESAVIORA V projekt STRESAVIORA I so bili vključeni raziskovalci, ki so ugotovili, da bi morali mladi postati odpornejši, izražati svoja mnenja, se vključevati v razprave in se postaviti zase.
It included those in their direct social environment (e.g. parents, teachers and police officers) whose awareness needed to be raised. 
Vključene so bile tudi osebe iz njihovega neposrednega družbenega okolja (npr. starši, učitelji in policisti), katerih ozaveščenost bi bilo treba izboljšati.
STRESAVIORA II aims to implement the tools for increasing resilience that were developed during the first phase of the project in two cities in each of five EU countries (Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden). 
Projekt STRESAVIORA II je namenjen uporabi orodij za povečanje odpornosti, ki so bila pripravljena v prvi fazi projekta v dveh mestih v petih državah članicah EU (Belgija, Francija, Nemčija, Nizozemska in Švedska).
The project concerns all types of radicalisation (not just Islamist), and so could be extended to other parts of Europe with different needs. 
Projekt obravnava vse vrste radikalizacije (ne samo islamistično), zato bi ga bilo mogoče razširiti in vanj vključiti tudi druge dele Evrope z drugačnimi potrebami.
Are the actions financed by the different EU funds coordinated to make the most of any synergies? 
Ali se ukrepi, financirani iz različnih skladov EU, usklajujejo, tako da so sinergije čim bolj izkoriščene?
In order to answer this question, we assessed whether the Commission had the necessary procedures for coordinating its support. 
Za odgovor na to vprašanje je Sodišče ocenilo, ali je Komisija vzpostavila postopke, ki so potrebni za usklajevanje njene podpore.
Has the Commission put in place a framework to assess the effectiveness and value for money of its support? 
Ali je Komisija vzpostavila okvir za ocenjevanje uspešnosti in stroškovne učinkovitosti svoje podpore?
In order to answer this question, we examined whether the Commission had set up the necessary framework of indicators and reports to assess whether its policy is effective and offers value for money. 
Za odgovor na to vprašanje je Sodišče preučilo, ali je Komisija vzpostavila okvir kazalnikov in poročil, potreben za oceno, ali je njena politika uspešna in zagotavlja stroškovno učinkovitost.
We also examined whether assessments of individual actions measured not only activity, but also effectiveness. 
Preučilo je tudi, ali se je pri ocenjevanju posameznih ukrepov merila tudi uspešnost in ne samo dejavnosti.
Our focus was mainly on the period from 2014 onwards, to coincide with the start of the 2014-2020 funding periods for the CommissionŐs funds and programmes. 
Sodišče se je osredotočilo v glavnem na obdobje po letu 2014, ki se ujema z začetkom obdobja financiranja 2014–2020 za sklade in programe Komisije.
We focused mainly on the management of actions within the EU whose primary purpose was to prevent and counter radicalisation, but we also took into account actions which pursue broader objectives, such as the social inclusion of disadvantaged groups. 
Sodišče se je osredotočilo v glavnem na upravljanje ukrepov v EU, ki so bili v prvi vrsti namenjeni preprečevanju radikalizacije in boju proti njej, čeprav je upoštevalo tudi tiste, ki imajo širše cilje, kot je socialna vključenost prikrajšanih skupin.
We did not examine information systems (e.g. the Schengen Information System) for exchanging information between Member States on details of radicalised individuals. 
Ni pa preučilo informacijskih sistemov (npr. schengenskega informacijskega sistema) za izmenjavo informacij o podrobnostih v zvezi z radikaliziranimi posamezniki med državami članicami.
Audit approach 14. 
Revizijski pristop 14.
Our audit fieldwork was carried out from November 2016 to March 2017. 
Delo Sodišča na terenu je potekalo od novembra 2016 do marca 2017.
We based our observations on the following sources of evidence: a review of documentation on policies, procedures and actions relating to support for Member States in addressing radicalisation; interviews with Commission directorates-general that manage EU funds and tools for addressing radicalisation, as well as with the RAN Centre of Excellence, the EU IRU at Europol, and the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (an organisation which promotes the sharing of knowledge and ideas on counter-terrorism); 13 
Opažanja Sodišča temeljijo na naslednjih virih dokazov: pregledu dokumentacije o politikah, postopkih in ukrepih v zvezi s pomočjo državam članicam pri odzivu na radikalizacijo; razgovorih z generalnimi direktorati Komisije, ki upravljajo sklade in orodja EU za odziv na radikalizacijo, Centrom odličnosti Mreže za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji, enoto EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin pri Europolu ter Mednarodnim centrom za boj proti terorizmu (organizacijo, ki spodbuja izmenjavo znanja in idej v zvezi z bojem proti terorizmu); 14
a survey we sent out to counter-terrorist focal points in all the Member StatesŐ Permanent Representations to the EU. 
anketi, ki smo jo poslali kontaktnim točkam v stalnih predstavništvih vseh držav članic pri EU.
15 out of 28 counter-terrorist focal points completed the survey, i.e. a response rate of 54 %. 
Nanjo je odgovorilo 15 od 28 kontaktnih točk za boj proti terorizmu, kar pomeni 54-odstotno stopnjo odziva.
The survey included questions on the relevance, added value and challenges of the support given to Member States; visits to national authorities in Belgium and France in order to assess the relevance and added value of the support they receive. 
Anketa je vsebovala vprašanja o ustreznosti in dodani vrednosti podpore za države članice ter izzivih zanjo; obiskih nacionalnih organov v Belgiji in Franciji zaradi ocene ustreznosti in dodane vrednosti prejete podpore.
OBSERVATIONS Support is relevant and well designed 15. 
OPAŽANJA Podpora je ustrezna in dobro zasnovana 15.
We examined the CommissionŐs policy framework in order to assess whether it addressed Member StatesŐ needs, and whether there were any gaps. 
Sodišče je preučilo okvir Komisije za to politiko, da bi ocenili, ali je ustrezal potrebam držav članic in ali so bile v njem kake vrzeli.
We also examined whether actions were designed in such a way as to bring benefits to Member States from acting at European level. 
Preučilo je tudi, ali so bili ukrepi zasnovani tako, da bi imele države članice korist od ukrepanja na evropski ravni.
The Commission addressed the needs of Member States, with few exceptions 16. 
Komisija je, razen z nekaj izjemami, obravnavala potrebe držav članic 16.
Member StatesŐ policymakers can inform the Commission about the areas where they need support in addressing radicalisation. This is done through various meetings, networks and documents (e.g. the Council Working Group on Terrorism, the network of prevent policymakers launched in February 2017 and Council Conclusions), or as part of the approval of work programmes for EU funds. 
Oblikovalci politike v državah članicah lahko obveščajo Komisijo o področjih, na katerih potrebujejo pomoč pri odzivanju na radikalizacijo, in sicer na različnih sestankih, v okviru mrež in z dokumenti (npr. delovna skupina Sveta za področje terorizma, mreža nacionalnih oblikovalcev preprečevalne politike, vzpostavljena februarja 2017, in sklepi Sveta) ali kot del sprejemanja programov dela za sklade EU.
We found that when the Commission drafted its policy framework to address radicalisation, it took account of the needs expressed by Member StatesŐ policymakers (see Box 4). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je Komisija pri pripravi svojega okvira politike za odziv na radikalizacijo upoštevala potrebe, o katerih so jo obvestili snovalci politike v državah članicah (glej okvir 4).
14 Box 4 - Examples where the Commission took account of the needs expressed by Member States In November 2015, the Member StatesŐ Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs used the Conclusions of the Council of the European Union to highlight the need for the Commission to support Member States in addressing radicalisation in prisons. 
15 Okvir 4 – Primeri, v katerih je Komisija upoštevala potrebe, o katerih so jo obvestile države članice Novembra 2015 so ministri držav članic za pravosodje in notranje zadeve uporabili sklepe Sveta Evropske unije, da bi poudarili, da mora Komisija podpreti države članice pri odzivanju na radikalizacijo v zaporih.
In response, the 2016 ŇCommunication on supporting the prevention of radicalisation leading to violent extremismÓ included a focus on radicalisation in prisons. 
Kot odgovor na to je bil v sporočilo iz leta 2016 o spodbujanju preprečevanja radikalizacije, ki vodi v nasilni ekstremizem, vključen poudarek, dan radikalizaciji v zaporih.
Just as Member StatesŐ needs have changed in response to the changing threat situation, so has the CommissionŐs support. 
Tako kot so se spremenile potrebe držav članic zaradi spreminjajočega se stanja ogroženosti, se je spremenila tudi podpora Komisije.
In modifying its support, the Commission takes account of the work of European bodies such as Europol which provides it with information on the threat situation in Member States (see Box 5). 
Komisija pri spreminjanju svoje pomoči upošteva delo evropskih organov, kot je Europol, ki ji zagotavlja informacije o stanju ogroženosti v državah članicah (glej okvir 5).
15 Following the terrorist attacks in Paris and Denmark in early 2015, in March 2015 EU Education Ministers issued the Paris Declaration on promoting citizenship and the common values of freedom, tolerance and non-discrimination through education. 
16 Po terorističnih napadih v Parizu in na Danskem v začetku leta 2015 so ministri EU za izobraževanje marca 2015 izdali pariško deklaracijo o spodbujanju državljanstva in skupnih vrednot svobode, strpnosti in nediskriminacije z izobraževanjem.
In line with this Declaration, the 2016 ŇCommunication on supporting the prevention of radicalisation leading to violent extremismÓ placed greater emphasis on tackling social exclusion. 
V skladu s to deklaracijo je bil v sporočilu iz leta 2016 o spodbujanju preprečevanja radikalizacije, ki vodi v nasilni ekstremizem, dan večji poudarek boju proti socialni izključenosti.
Box 5 - The CommissionŐs support changes in response to the threat situation In response to recent terrorist attacks in Europe and EuropolŐs analysis, the 2016 ŇCommunication on supporting the prevention of radicalisation leading to violent extremismÓ highlighted the threat posed by returning foreign terrorist fighters (those who leave their home in the EU and travel to other countries, e.g. the conflict zones in Syria and Iraq, to take part in terrorist fighting or training). 
Okvir 5 – Podpora Komisije se spreminja glede na stanje ogroženosti V odziv na nedavne teroristične napade v Evropi in analizo Europola je v sporočilu iz leta 2016 o spodbujanju preprečevanja radikalizacije, ki vodi v nasilni ekstremizem, poudarjena grožnja, ki jo pomenijo tuji teroristični bojevniki povratniki (ki so zapustili svoj dom v EU in odpotovali v druge države, npr. območja spopadov v Siriji in Iraku, da bi sodelovali v terorističnih bojih ali urjenju).
It reinforced support for developing exit strategies to help individuals to disengage from radicalised environments and reintegrate into society. 
Okrepljena je bila tudi podpora za pripravo strategij izstopa za pomoč posameznikom pri osvoboditvi iz radikaliziranih sredin in ponovni vključitvi v družbo.
As the Commission takes account of the needs expressed by Member States, the policy framework focuses support for Member States on relevant areas. 
Ker Komisija upošteva potrebe, o katerih so jo obvestile države članice, okvir politike osredotoča podporo za države članice na ustrezna področja.
Our survey confirmed that most respondents felt the CommissionŐs support for Member States in the various areas was relevant (see Figure 2). 
Anketa Sodišča je potrdila, da je po mnenju večine anketirancev, ki so odgovorili na anketo, podpora Komisije za države članice na različnih področjih ustrezna (glej sliko 2).
The percentage varied between 64 % and 80 %, depending on the area. 
Odstotek se je gibal med 64 % in 80 %, odvisno od področja.
The Annex shows how the Commission not only targeted relevant areas in its policy framework, but also applied the various EU funds to carry out actions which actually address those areas in practice. 
V Prilogi je prikazano, kako je Komisija v svojem okviru politike usmerjala pomoč na različna področja in poleg tega uporabljala različne sklade EU za izvajanje ukrepov, ki ta področja dejansko obravnavajo v praksi.
Figure 2 - Relevance of the Commission support Source: Audit survey of Member StatesŐ Permanent Representations to the EU. 
Slika 2 – Ustreznost podpore Komisije Vir: revizijska anketa za stalna predstavništva držav članic pri EU 19.
19. However, there were exceptions where needs were not sufficiently addressed: The Belgian authorities informed us that the issue of mainstream media (television, radio and the press) was insufficiently addressed in the policy framework. 
Vendar so obstajale izjeme, pri katerih potrebe niso bile dovolj upoštevane. Belgijski organi so seznanili Sodišče, da tradicionalni mediji (televizija, radio in časopisi) niso bili dovolj obravnavani v okviru politike.
They considered it important to include this issue in the policy framework in order to facilitate reflection on the mediaŐs role not only in encouraging people to leave Europe to fight in Syria but also in contributing to polarisation in society, which could create tensions leading to radicalisation. 
Menili so, da je pomembno vključiti to vprašanje v okvir politike, da se omogoči razmislek o vlogi medijev ne samo pri spodbujanju posameznikov k odhodu iz Evrope zaradi bojevanja v Siriji, ampak tudi pri njihovem prispevku k polarizaciji družbe, kar bi lahko povzročilo napetosti, ki bi privedle do radikalizacije.
The need to develop exit strategies (see Box 5) was not sufficiently addressed in practice. 
V praksi potreba po pripravi strategij izstopa (glej okvir 5) ni bila dovolj obravnavana.
In 2014, the Commission launched a call for proposals for projects to be financed by the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ. 
Leta 2014 je Komisija objavila razpis za zbiranje predlogov za projekte, ki naj bi se financirali iz Sklada za notranjo varnost – Policija.
This call aimed to address two priorities: preventing radicalisation and developing exit strategies. 
Razpis je bil namenjen obravnavanju dveh prioritet: boja proti radikalizaciji in priprave strategij izstopa.
However, only projects addressing the first objective of preventing radicalisation were funded because they received a higher ranking. 
Financirali pa so se samo projekti, s katerimi je bila obravnavana prva prioriteta, tj. preprečevanje radikalizacije, ker so bili višje uvrščeni na prednostni lestvici.
The 2015 and 2016 annual work programmes for the 16 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Not relevant Relevant Developing knowledge of radicalisation and sharing practices Countering terrorist propaganda Promoting inclusive and resilient societies Identifying and dealing with radicalised people Addressing radicalisation in countries outside Europe % respondents 
V programih dela za 17 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Ni relevantno Relevantno Pridobivanje znanja o radikalizaciji in izmenjava praks Boj proti teroristični propagandi Odkrivanje vključujoče in radikaliziranih radikalizacijo v Spodbujanje Odzivanje na odporne družbe oseb in državah zunaj ravnanje z Evrope njimi % anketirancev
ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ included no further calls for proposals to develop programmes on exit strategies. 
leti 2015 in 2016 za Sklad za notranjo varnost – Policija niso bili vključeni nobeni dodatni razpisi za zbiranje predlogov za pripravo programov za strategije izstopa.
Support is designed to bring benefits to Member States from acting at European level 20. 
Podpora je zasnovana tako, da bi države članice imele korist od ukrepanja na evropski ravni 20.
The Commission not only targets relevant areas, but also makes use of EU funds and tools to deliver concrete support for Member States which is designed to bring benefits from acting at European level. 
Ne samo, da Komisija podporo usmerja na ustrezna področja, ampak sklade in orodja EU uporablja za zagotavljanje konkretne podpore za države članice, ki naj bi prinašala korist od ukrepanja na evropski ravni.
Examples of this support include the RAN (see Box 1), the EU Internet Forum, the European Strategic Communications Network and the EU IRU at Europol (see Box 2). 
Primeri te podpore vključujejo Mrežo za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji (glej okvir 1), Internetni forum EU, Evropsko mrežo za strateško komuniciranje in enoto EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin pri Europolu (glej okvir 2).
These initiatives, which specifically target radicalisation, promote cooperation between Member States and would not be implemented at all - or not as efficiently - by Member States acting individually. 
Te pobude, namenjene posebej radikalizaciji, spodbujajo sodelovanje med državami članicami in sploh ne bi bile izvedene ali vsaj ne tako učinkovito, če bi države članice ukrepale same.
The ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ national programmes managed by Member States are also designed to bring benefits from acting at European level by raising national standards to reduce disparities and by stimulating synergies between Member States. 
Tudi nacionalni programi Sklada za notranjo varnost – Policija, ki jih upravljajo države članice, so zasnovani tako, da prinašajo koristi zaradi delovanja na evropski ravni, in sicer z zviševanjem nacionalnih standardov za zmanjševanje razlik in spodbujanjem sinergije med državami članicami.
18 Member States included specific actions to tackle radicalisation in their national programmes. 
18 držav članic je v svoje nacionalne programe vključilo ukrepe, namenjene posebej radikalizaciji.
Belgium, for example, financed projects to increase radicalisation awareness in prisons, support a network for assisting vulnerable families, and fund mobile multidisciplinary teams to analyse the needs of local authorities and propose local strategies. 
Belgija je na primer financirala projekte za povečevanje ozaveščenosti o radikalizaciji v zaporih, podpiranje mreže za pomoč ranljivim družinam ter financiranje mobilnih multidisciplinarnih teamov za analizo potreb lokalnih organov in pripravo predlogov lokalnih strategij.
The Commission fosters synergies, but coordination could be improved 22. 
Komisija spodbuja sinergijo, lahko pa bi izboljšala koordinacijo 22.
The Commission is increasingly active in supporting Member States in addressing radicalisation. 
Komisija je vse bolj aktivna pri podpiranju držav članic pri odzivu na radikalizacijo.
14 out of the 15 respondents to our survey (see paragraph 14) felt that the Commission was more active now than five years ago. 
14 od 15 anketirancev, ki so odgovorili na vprašanja, (glej odstavek 15) je menilo, da je bila Komisija takrat aktivnejša kot pet let prej.