natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There are five ‘strategic objectives’ which lead to six envisaged actions/priorities (see Box 2). 
Strateških ciljev je pet, iz njih pa izhaja šest predvidenih ukrepov/prednostnih nalog (glej okvir 2).
They are all in line with the Union’s principal objectives for humanitarian aid (see Box 1 in paragraph 4) and they allow the needs identified to be addressed. 
Vsi so v skladu z glavnimi cilji Unije za humanitarno pomoč (glej okvir 1 pod odstavkom 4) in omogočajo obravnavo opredeljenih potreb.
All the interventions have to target the most vulnerable populations. 
Vse intervencije morajo biti namenjene najbolj ranljivim skupinam prebivalstva.
17 HIP AGL 2015 version 4, point 4) envisaged ECHO response, p. 
17 Humanitarni izvedbeni načrt za območje afriških Velikih jezer za leto 2015, različica 4, točka 4, predvideni odziv ECHO, str.
Observations 15 Main priorities: (a) reducing protection risks and addressing protection needs, (b) providing minimum basic services, health, food and NFI as fast as possible in emergency situations, (c) providing support to the management of refugee camps in the region, (d) providing water, hygiene and sanitation activities in areas at risk, outside conflict zones, (e) giving priority to multi-sector approaches, and (f) supporting coordination, security and logistics. 
Opažanja 15 Glavne prednostne naloge: (a) zmanjševanje tveganj v zvezi z zaščito in obravnavanje potreb po zaščiti; (b) čim hitrejše zagotavljanje minimalnih osnovnih storitev, zdravstvenih storitev, hrane in neprehrambenih izdelkov v nujnih primerih; (c) zagotavljanje podpore upravi begunskih taborišč na območju; (d) zagotavljanje oskrbe z vodo, higiene in sanitarij na ogroženih področjih izven konfliktnih območij; (e) namenjanje prednosti večsektorskim pristopom; (f) podpiranje usklajevanja, varnosti in logistike.
19 The main constraints faced by the Commission, and donors in general, are in the DRC. 
19 Komisija in donatorji na splošno naletijo na omejitve v glavnem v DR Kongo.
They are related to the challenging logistics in such a large country, the poor state of infrastructure and the lack of government’s capacity and willingness to contribute. 
Omejitve so povezane z zahtevnostjo logistike v tako veliki državi, slabim stanjem infrastrukture ter pomanjkanjem zmogljivosti vlade in njene pripravljenosti za angažiranje.
The lack of partners in some parts of the country may also limit the capacity to make interventions. 
Tudi pomanjkanje partnerjev v nekaterih delih države lahko omeji zmogljivost za intervencije.
Finally, the security constraints, due to the constant shifting of military operations and subsequent movements of armed groups, curtail the activities of the donors, especially in the most remote areas. 
Poleg tega varnostne omejitve, ki jih povzroča nenehna selitev vojaških operacij in posledični premiki oboroženih skupin, ovirajo dejavnosti donatorjev, še predvsem na najbolj oddaljenih območjih.
20 The Commission’s response is consistent with the analysis of the situation and needs assessment. 
20 Odziv Komisije je v skladu z analizo razmer in oceno potreb.
Both are consistent with the response described in the DRC’s Annual Humanitarian Action Plan (HAP) prepared by a team of humanitarian organisations representatives. Box 2 
Oboje je skladno z odzivom, opisanim v letnem humanitarnem akcijskem načrtu za DR Kongo, ki ga je pripravila ekipa predstavnikov humanitarnih organizacij. Okvir 2
Observations 16 Flexibility in programming and in funding is ensured 21 In the HIP, the Commission does not impose areas/sectors for intervention which may be obsolete by the time of the selection. 
Opažanja 16 Prožnost pri programskem načrtovanju in financiranju je zagotovljena 21 Komisija v humanitarnem izvedbenem načrtu ne določa intervencij na področ-jih/v sektorjih, ki bi bili lahko v času izbora že zastareli.
The Commission’s funding is driven by the most acute needs of the most vulnerable populations on the basis of the partners experience in the field, corroborated by the information shared by the humanitarian coordinator and the knowledge of the staff. 
Svoje financiranje usmerja glede na najnujnejše potrebe najbolj ranljivih skupin prebivalstva na podlagi izkušenj partnerjev na terenu, podkrepljenih z informacijami, ki jih posreduje koordinator humanitarne pomoči, in znanjem uslužbencev.
Further prioritisation, mainly geographical, is done at the selection stage (see paragraph 25). 
Dodatno prednostno razvrščanje, zlasti geografsko, se opravi v fazi izbora (glej odstavek 25).
22 The Commission carries out a mid-term review of the HIPs on the basis of the subsequent year’s needs assessment. 
22 Komisija izvede vmesni pregled humanitarnih izvedbenih načrtov na podlagi ocene potreb iz naslednjega leta.
Moreover, the HIP is revised any time the evolution of the situation triggers a modification of the allocated amount. 
Poleg tega se načrt spremeni vsakič, ko razvoj položaja povzroči spremembo dodeljenega zneska.
When an increase of the initial allocation is approved, the additional funding can be obtained from the operational reserve, an amount of approximately 20 % of the annual budget set aside for unexpected emergencies. 
Ko je povečanje prvotno dodeljenih sredstev odobreno, je mogoče pridobiti dodatna sredstva iz operativne rezerve, ki znaša približno 20 % letnega proračuna in je rezervirana za nepričakovane nujne primere.
It may also be obtained from the EU EAR or from the EDF budget. 
Dodatna sredstva je mogoče dobiti tudi iz rezerve EU za dodatno pomoč ali iz proračuna ERS.
23 For the AGL region, this flexibility has been used several times during the period under review to address the consequences of unexpected events or deteriorating situation (see Graph 2). 
23 Za območje afriških Velikih jezer je bila ta prožnost v pregledanem obdobju večkrat uporabljena za odpravljanje posledic nepričakovanih dogodkov ali slabšanja razmer (glej diagram 2).
In 2015 alone, due mainly to the Burundian refugee crisis18, the HIP for the AGL region was modified three times. 
Samo v letu 2015 je bil humanitarni izvedbeni načrt za območje afriških Velikih jezer spremenjen trikrat, zlasti zaradi burundij-ske begunske krize18.
24 In addition, the AGL region operational team set aside a small share of the HIP’s allocation (approximately 1.5 million euros in 2015) for sudden increases in needs in the course of the year. 
24 Poleg tega je operativna ekipa za območje afriških Velikih jezer namenila majhen delež sredstev iz humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta (približno 1,5 milijona EUR v letu 2015) za nenadna povečanja potreb med letom.
This was used as a top-up for ongoing projects dealing with refugee camps in Rwanda and Tanzania as soon as it became known that high numbers of Burundians were fleeing the country at the end of April 2015. 
Ta sredstva so bila uporabljena kot dodatna sredstva za tekoče projekte v zvezi z begunskimi taborišči v Ruandi in Tanzaniji, takoj ko se je konec aprila 2015 razvedelo, da veliko število Burundijcev beži iz svoje države.
This allowed a prompt reaction while waiting for the approval of the first increase of the HIP which took place at the end of May. 
To je omogočilo takojšen odziv med čakanjem na odobritev prvega povečanja sredstev v okviru humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta, do katere je prišlo konec maja.
18 2 million euros were also added to the initial 2015 allocation for the AGL region because of the inflow of ± 80 000 of Central Africans to the DRC. 
18 Prvotno dodeljenim sredstvom za območje afriških Velikih jezer za leto 2015 sta bila dodana tudi 2 milijona EUR zaradi prihoda ± 80 000 Srednjeafričanov v DR Kongo.
Observations 17 Budget of the AGL region for the period 2011‐2015 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EU budget ad-hoc decisions EDF ad-hoc decisions HIP updates HIP initial amount 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Burundian crisis M23 rebellion in North Kivu Deterioration of the situation in Katanga due to conflicts Deterioration of nutritional situation in DRC and Burundi 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: European Court of Auditors. millioneuro Graph 2 
Opažanja 17 Proračun za območje afriških Velikih jezer za obdobje 2011–2015 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Ad hoc sklepi – proračun EU Ad hoc sklepi – ERS Posodobitve humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta Prvotni znesek iz humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Kriza v Burundiju Upor skupine M23 v Severnem Kivuju Poslabšanje razmer v Katangi zaradi konfliktov Poslabšanje prehranskih razmer v DR Kongo in Burundiju 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče. v milijonih EUR Diagram 2
Observations 18 Mahama refugee camp in Rwanda, newly built area hosting Burundian refugees Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Opažanja 18 Begunsko taborišče Mahama v Ruandi, novonaseljeno območje, na katerem živijo begunci iz Burundija Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Insufficient transparency at the project selection stage Geographical priorities in areas of conflict are not documented 25 In the HIP, the geographical area of intervention corresponding to the conflict zones is Eastern Congo, which includes North Kivu, South Kivu and the different regions of the former province Katanga. 
Premajhna preglednost v fazi izbora projekta Geografske prioritete na konfliktnih območjih niso dokumentirane 25 V humanitarnem izvedbenem načrtu za geografsko območje intervencije, ki se nanaša na konfliktna območja, šteje vzhodni del Konga, ki zajema Severni Kivu, Južni Kivu in različne regije nekdanje province Katanga.
In a volatile environment such as that in the DRC, more precise areas, where the most acute needs and most vulnerable populations are to be found, cannot be determined in advance. Picture 2 
Zaradi spremenljivosti razmer, kakršna se kaže v DR Kongo, ni mogoče vnaprej določiti natančnejših območij z najnujnejšimi potrebami in najbolj ranljivimi skupinami prebivalstva. Fotografija 2
Observations 19 26 According to the Commission, just before the assessment of the funding requests, the operational team defines top priority areas for allocating its support on the basis of information gathered on movements of the armed groups, including the FARDC, movements of population and the presence of partners. 
Opažanja 19 26 Komisija navaja, da operativna ekipa tik pred oceno vlog za financiranje opredeli glavna prednostna območja za dodelitev podpore, in sicer na podlagi informacij o premikih oboroženih skupin, vključno z oboroženimi silami Demokratične republike Kongo (FARDC), preseljevanja prebivalstva in prisotnosti partnerjev.
However, as this was not documented it was not possible to ascertain whether these geographical priorities were soundly based and whether the selected projects took place in top priority areas. 
Ker to ni bilo dokumentirano, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali so imele te geografske prioritete trdno podlago in ali so izbrani projekti potekali na glavnih prednostnih območjih.
The selection process is not well documented 27 Over the period under review, 2011-2015, the Commission received on average 71 funding requests per year, following the first publication of the HIP, and selected around half of them. 
Proces izbora ni dobro dokumentiran 27 Komisija je v pregledanem obdobju 2011–2015 po prvi objavi humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta letno prejela povprečno 71 vlog za financiranje, od katerih jih je izbrala približno polovico.
Depending on the evolution of the situation and the advent of new/increased needs in the course of the year, the Commission finally supported an average of 40 projects. 
Glede na spreminjanje razmer in pojav novih/pove-čanih potreb med letom je na koncu podprla povprečno 40 projektov.
The repartition of the HIP allocation is shown in Graph 1. 
Porazdelitev dodeljenih sredstev v okviru humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta je prikazana na diagramu 1.
28 Partners receive comprehensive guidance regarding their funding requests which are submitted in an electronic exchange system in a predetermined format. 
28 Partnerji prejmejo izčrpna navodila za svoje vloge za financiranje, ki jih v vnaprej določenem formatu vnesejo v sistem elektronske izmenjave.
All of these are assessed by the operational teams in Brussels and in the field and are discussed among these teams19. 
Operativne ekipe v Bruslju in na terenu ocenijo vse vloge in o njih razpravljajo19.
They present the final outcome of the selection in an internal document for decision. 
Končni izid izbora predstavijo v internem dokumentu, ki se uporabi za odločitev.
For the selected funding requests, the appraisal part of a document used for managing the project is then completed. 
Nato se za izbrane vloge za financiranje izpolni ocenjevalni del dokumenta, ki se uporablja za upravljanje projekta.
This document provides information for each significant stage of the project cycle: funding request, interim report, field visits, modification requests and final report. 
Ta dokument zagotavlja informacije o vsaki pomembni fazi projektnega cikla: vloga za financiranje, vmesno poročilo, obiski na terenu, zahtevki za spremembo in končno poročilo.
29 However, this appraisal part is not structured in such a way to demonstrate clearly that the criteria and general principles, detailed in the annex of the HIP, were assessed for each proposal. 
29 Vendar pa ta ocenjevalni del ni sestavljen tako, da bi bilo iz njega jasno razvidno, da je bil vsak predlog ocenjen glede na merila in splošna načela, ki so podrobno opisana v prilogi k humanitarnemu izvedbenemu načrtu.
Some key aspects such as the partner’s implementation capacity, the partner’s knowledge of the country/region, protection and resilience aspects are not mentioned at all. 
Nekateri ključni elementi, kot so partnerjeva izvedbena zmogljivost, njegovo poznavanje države/re-gije ter vidiki zaščite in odpornosti, sploh niso omenjeni.
For the projects examined, which were all in line with the main priorities and objectives set in the HIP, some general principles were not systematically assessed20 or some of the assessments were weak21. 
Preučeni projekti so bili sicer vsi v skladu z glavnimi prednostnimi nalogami in cilji, določenimi v humanitarnem izvedbenem načrtu, vendar nekatera splošna načela niso bila sistematično ocenjena20 ali pa so bile ocene včasih šibke21.
From the information available it was not possible to determine the comparative merits of the funding requests submitted and therefore to conclude that the most relevant projects were selected. 
Iz razpoložljivih informacij ni bilo mogoče razbrati primerjalnih prednosti predloženih vlog za financiranje in tako tudi ni bilo mogoče priti do zaključka o tem, ali so bili izbrani najustreznejši projekti.
19 The bulk of the funding requests are submitted around the indicative date mentioned in the first version of the HIP, usually towards year end or at the beginning of the subsequent year. 
19 Večina vlog za financiranje je predložena okoli okvirnega datuma, navedenega v prvi različici humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta, običajno proti koncu leta ali na začetku naslednjega leta.
20 (1) Adaptation to the specific needs related to gender and age. 
20 (1) Prilagoditev posebnim potrebam v zvezi s spolom in starostjo.
(2) Integration of resilience activities by identifying the possibilities to reduce potential risks for vulnerable people and to reinforce their livelihood, this also includes the recommendation from the Commission to its partners to explore from the beginning possible synergies and complementarities with development and national actors. 
(2) Integracija dejavnosti na področju odpornosti z ugotovitvijo možnosti za zmanjšanje morebitnih tveganj za ranljive osebe in okrepitev njihove zmožnosti preživetja. K temu šteje tudi priporočilo Komisije partnerjem, naj že v začetku raziščejo mogoče sinergije in dopolnjevanja z razvojnimi in nacionalnimi akterji.
(3) Integration of protection activities which objective is to reduce physical and psychological insecurity for persons and groups under threat. 
(3) Integracija dejavnosti zaščite, katerih cilj je zmanjšati fizično in psihološko negotovost za ogrožene osebe in skupine.
21 Weak or incomplete project appraisal was also mentioned by the Internal Audit Service of the Commission in its audit report on Contribution Agreements with UN bodies and other International Organisations of 19.6.2014. 
21 Šibke ali nepopolne ocene projektov je omenila tudi služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo v svojem revizijskem poročilu o sporazumih o prispevkih, sklenjenih z organih ZN in drugimi mednarodnimi organizacijami, z dne 19. junija 2014.
Observations 20 Cost efficiency is not analysed 30 The budgets provided with the funding requests for the projects examined were not detailed and were not analysed prior to selection. 
Opažanja 20 Stroškovna učinkovitost ni bila analizirana 30 Proračuni, ki so bili navedeni v vlogah za financiranje preučenih projektov, niso bili podrobni in pred izborom niso bili analizirani.
Thus no assessments of these were made to determine if the proposed costs were reasonable. 
Tako torej ni bilo ocene, s katero bi se ugotovilo, ali so predlagani stroški razumni.
In the case of partners, usually UN agencies sub-contracting activities to implementing bodies, there was no information on the level of funding that went to these bodies. 
Glede partnerjev, običajno agencij ZN, ki dejavnosti oddajo v podizvajanje organom izvajanja, ni bilo nobenih informacij o stopnji financiranja, ki so jo ti organi prejeli.
In general, no data was available on the level of aid spent on the beneficiaries. 
Na splošno ni bilo nobenih razpoložljivih podatkov o stopnji pomoči, porabljeni za upravičence.
31 In a context of ever-increasing humanitarian needs and ever tighter funding possibilities, efficiency aspects are of even greater importance. 
31 Glede na čedalje večje humanitarne potrebe in vse manjše možnosti za financiranje so vidiki učinkovitosti še pomembnejši.
Moreover, in the absence of adequate checks to ascertain that the budget is reasonable at the selection stage, subsequent analyses on the execution of this budget have limited use. 
Poleg tega je brez ustreznih pregledov, s katerimi bi se v fazi izbora preverila razumnost proračuna, koristnost poznejših analiz izvrševanja proračuna le delna.
Overall, the Commission’s monitoring is appropriate although the information obtained could be better used 32 We examined whether the Commission obtained adequate information from project reporting to monitor progress and took appropriate and timely measures when needed. 
Spremljanje Komisije je na splošno ustrezno, čeprav bi bilo mogoče bolje uporabiti pridobljene informacije 32 Preučili smo, ali je Komisija iz poročanja o projektih pridobila ustrezne informacije za spremljanje napredka in, če je bilo potrebno, sprejela ustrezne in pravočasne ukrepe.
In most cases, the Commission obtains adequate information on project implementation The monitoring framework in place is appropriate 33 This framework is based on: (a) an interim report, due 3 months before the end of actions whose duration exceeds 10 months, and a final report, to be submitted within 3 months following the end of the project and triggering the final payment (see Annex V); (b) a minimum of one field visit per project by Commission staff, provided that security or logistical constraints allow for that22. 
Komisija v večini primerov pridobi ustrezne informacije o izvajanju projektov Vzpostavljeni okvir za spremljanje je ustrezen 33 Ta okvir temelji na: (a) vmesnem poročilu, ki ga je treba oddati tri mesece pred koncem izvajanja ukrepov, ki trajajo več kot deset mesecev, in končnem poročilu, ki ga je treba oddati v treh mesecih po koncu projekta in ki sproži končno plačilo (glej Prilogo V); (b) tem, da uslužbenci Komisije opravijo vsaj en obisk na terenu na projekt, če to dopuščajo varnostne ali logistične omejitve22.
22 Any exception should be justified as it was the case for two projects in our sample. 
22 Vsako izjemo bi bilo treba upravičiti, kot je bilo pri dveh projektih v našem vzorcu.
Observations 21 34 In addition, the Commission carries out periodic, usually annual, assessments of the partners, focused on their financial soundness. 
Opažanja 21 34 Poleg tega Komisija opravlja redno (običajno letno) ocenjevanje partnerjev, osredotočeno na njihovo finančno trdnost.
The Commission also supervises audits, sub-contracted to external audit firms, at partners’ headquarters and in the field. 
Nadzoruje tudi revizije, ki so bile oddane v podizvajanje zunanjim revizijskim podjetjem, in sicer na sedežih partnerjev in na terenu.
Considering the nature of the actions and their duration, the monitoring framework in place is satisfactory. 
Glede na naravo ukrepov in njihovo trajanje je vzpostavljeni okvir za spremljanje zadovoljiv.
The timeliness and quality of some reporting was unsatisfactory 35 Interim and final reports are submitted through an electronic exchange system in a predetermined format. 
Pravočasnost in kakovost sta bili pri delu poročanja nezadovoljivi 35 Vmesna in končna poročila se v vnaprej določenem formatu vnesejo v sistem elektronske izmenjave.
They should include updated operational information, on the values reached per indicator and financial information, namely the budget consumption, to allow the Commission to conclude on the progress of an action as a whole. 
Vsebovati bi morala posodobljene operativne informacije v zvezi z vrednostmi, doseženimi za posamezne kazalnike, in finančne informacije, namreč o porabi proračuna, da se Komisiji omogoči sprejemanje zaključkov o napredku ukrepa kot celote.
The analysis of these reports and the reporting on the field visits is entered in its supervision document. 
Analiza teh poročil in poročila o obiskih na terenu se vključijo v njen dokument o nadzoru.
36 Many interim and final reports were considerably delayed and no explanations for these delays were demanded by the Commission. 
36 Številna vmesna in končna poročila so močno zamujala, Komisija pa ni zahtevala pojasnil za te zamude.
In particular, a high proportion of interim and final reports for projects implemented by UN agencies and IOs was not submitted on time (see Table 1). 
Zlasti ni bil pravočasno predložen velik delež vmesnih in končnih poročil za projekte, ki so jih izvajale agencije ZN in mednarodne organizacije (glej tabelo 1).
The late submission of interim reports curtails the Commission’s ability to address any problems that may be identified. 
Zaradi pozne predložitve vmesnih poročil se zmanjša možnost, da bi Komisija obravnavala ugotovljene probleme.
37 While, overall, the quality of the interim reports was satisfactory, we considered that only three out of the 18 final reports23 were satisfactory. 
37 Čeprav je bila kakovost vmesnih poročil na splošno zadovoljiva, so bila po mnenju Sodišča zadovoljiva samo tri od 18 končnih poročil23.
In the 15 other cases, the initial information reported was not sufficient to explain the level of performance achieved, the impossibility of using some indicators or why some activities had not been carried out. 
V preostalih 15 primerih prvotno sporočene informacije niso bile zadostne, da bi pojasnile doseženo raven smotrnosti, nezmožnost uporabe nekaterih kazalnikov ali vzroke za to, da nekatere dejavnosti niso bile izvedene.
In some reports supporting documentation for the provided data was missing and financial information was not detailed enough. 
V nekaterih poročilih so manjkala dokazila o zagotovljenih podatkih, finančne informacije pa niso bile dovolj podrobne.
In all cases but one24, the Commission requested supplementary explanation from the partners. 
Komisija je v vseh primerih razen v enem24 od partnerjev zahtevala dodatna pojasnila.
They provided additional information which in all cases but two25, was deemed satisfactory. 
Ti so v vseh primerih razen v dveh25 zagotovili dodatne informacije, ki so štele za zadovoljive.
23 One final report was not received at the end of the audit. 
23 Eno končno poročilo do konca revizije ni bilo prejeto.
24 In one case, DG ECHO did not respect the deadlines for reviewing final reports and was not able to send a request for information. 
24 V enem primeru GD ECHO ni spoštoval rokov za pregled končnih poročil in ni mogel poslati zahteve po informacijah.