natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
10 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 CONTRIBUTIONS TO UN ORGANISATIONS IN 2006 AND 2007 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 UNDP WFP UNICEF UNRWA UNHCR FAO WHO UNFPA UNOPS ILO IFAD Other EuropeAid ECHO Source: Europeancommission. 
10 DIAGRAM 2 DIAGRAM 3 PRISPEVKI ORGANIZACIJAM ZN V LETIH 2006 IN 2007 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Vir: komisija.
SECTION 1.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 8. article 53 of the financial regulation which came into force in 2003 and was revised in 2007 sets out the conditions for working with international organisations2. this method of implementing the budget is called joint management. despite its name, the tasks related to the implementation of these funds are not jointly managed, but are delegated to international organisations to be implemented in accordance with their own procedures3. nevertheless, the treaty and the financial regulation insist that the commission retains overall responsibility for sound management of the budget4. tasks can be directly delegated to organisations and article 43 of the implementing rules on the financial regulation requires that the organisations and the actions to be financed shall be chosen in an objective and transparent manner5. 
ODDELEK 1.2 REGULATIVNI OKVIR 8. člen 53 Finančne uredbe, ki je stopila v veljavo leta 2003 in je bila spremenjena leta 2007, določa pogoje sodelovanja z mednarodnimi organizacijami2. Ta način izvrševanja proračuna se imenuje skupno upravljanje. kljub imenu pa se naloge, povezane z izvrševanjem teh sredstev, ne upravljajo skupno, temveč se prenesejo na mednarodne organizacije, ki jih upravljajo v skladu z lastnimi postopki3. vendar pa Pogodba in Finančna uredba določata, da mora komisija ohraniti splošno odgovornost za dobro upravljanje proračuna4. naloge je mogoče neposredno prenesti na organizacije in člen 43 podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Finančne uredbe zahteva, da se organizacije in ukrepi, ki se jih financira, izberejo na objektiven in pregleden način5.
9. the 2003 financial and administrative framework agreement (fafa) translates into contractual terms the requirements of the financial regulation and applies to all funding agreements between the commission and the Un. it sets out a framework intended to enhance cooperation by allowing Un organisations to manage contributions in accordance with their own procedures. the procedures for joint management with Un organisations differ from those required for actions implemented through ngos, which generally involve competition and the use of commission procedures. article 3.1 of the fafa requires all actions to comply with the principles of sound financial management, in particular value for money and cost-effectiveness. the fafa encourages multi-donor actions, requires Un organisations to publicise the role of EU funding, outlines the use of subcontractors and defines the financial framework and payment policy. it describes procedures for checking that funds are managed properly including the submission of reports by the Un and the right of the commission to carry out checks. 
9. okvirni finančni in upravni sporazum (FaFa) iz leta 2003 prenaša zahteve Finančne uredbe v pogodbene pogoje in se uporablja za vse sporazume o financiranju med komisijo in združenimi narodi. Predstavlja okvir, katerega namen je krepiti sodelovanje tako, da organizacijam zn omogoča, da s prispevki upravljajo v skladu z lastnimi postopki. Postopki za skupno upravljanje z organizacijami zn se razlikujejo od postopkov, potrebnih za izvajanje ukrepov prek nevladnih organizacij, ki običajno vključujejo konkurenco in uporabo postopkov komisije. člen 3.1 sporazuma FaFa določa, da morajo biti vsi ukrepi v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, zlasti z načeloma smotrne porabe sredstev ter stroškovne učinkovitosti. sporazum FaFa spodbuja večdonatorske ukrepe, zahteva, da organizacije zn obveščajo javnost o vlogi financiranja s strani Eu, določa uporabo podizvajalcev ter opredeljuje finančni okvir in plačilno politiko. opisuje postopke za preverjanje ustreznega upravljanja s sredstvi, ki vključujejo predložitev poročil s strani zn in pravico komisije, da izvaja preglede.
10. a contribution agreement is signed for each Un action funded by the commission, describing the amount of funding, the objectives of the action, the activities to be carried out and their timing. the contribution agreement incorporates the provisions of the fafa regarding the use of the Un organisation’s own procedures, visibility, use of subcontractors, financial framework and procedures for checking and reporting. 
10. za vsak ukrep zn, ki ga financira komisija, se podpiše sporazum o prispevku, v katerem so zapisani znesek financiranja, cilji ukrepa, dejavnosti, ki jih je treba izvesti, in rok za njihovo izvedbo. sporazum o prispevku vključuje določbe sporazuma FaFa o uporabi postopkov zadevne organizacije zn, prepoznavnosti, uporabi podizvajalcev, finančnem okviru ter postopkih pregledovanja in poročanja.
2 council regulation (Ec, Euratom) no 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the financial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European communities (oJ l 248, 16.9.2002, p. 
2 uredba sveta (Es, Euratom) št 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (ul l 248, 16.9.2002, str.
3 Un organisations may manage commission funds in accordance with their own accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures, provided these conform to internationally accepted standards (article 53d(1) of the financial regulation and the preamble to the fafa). 
3 organizacije zn lahko upravljajo s sredstvi komisije v skladu z lastnimi računovodskimi in revizijskimi postopki, postopki notranjega kontroliranja ter postopki za oddajo javnih naročil, če so ti v skladu z mednarodno sprejetimi standardi (člen 53d(1) Finančne uredbe in preambula FaFa).
4 article 274 of the Ec treaty states that the commission shall implement the budget on its own responsibility. article 27 of the financial regulation states that budget appropriations shall be used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management. article 165 of the financial regulation states that the implementation of actions by international organisations is subject to scrutiny by the commission. 
4 člen 274 Pogodbe Es določa, da komisija izvršuje proračun na lastno odgovornost. člen 27 Finančne uredbe določa, da morajo biti odobrena proračunska sredstva uporabljena v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja. člen 165 Finančne uredbe določa, da ukrepe, ki jih izvajajo mednarodne organizacije, nadzira komisija.
5 commission regulation (Ec, Euratom) no 2342/2002 of 23 december 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of council regulation (Ec, Euratom) no 1605/2002 on the financial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European communities (oJ l 357, 31.12.2002, p. 
5 uredba komisije (Es, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje uredbe sveta (Es, Euratom) št.
12 chaptEr 2 aUdit scopE and approach 11. the present audit covered overseas aid of Echo and Europeaid funded through Un organisations and addressed the following two questions: (a) does the process for deciding to implement aid through the Un demonstrate that this is the most efficient and effective option? (b) do monitoring arrangements provide assurance on the robustness of financial procedures and on the achievement of objectives? 
12 PoglavjE 2 oBsEg rEvizijE in rEvizijski PrisToP 11. Ta revizija je zajela pomoč čezmorskim državam, ki sta jo gd Echo in Europeaid namenila prek organizacij zn, in je obravnavala naslednji vprašanji: (a) ali postopek odločanja o izvajanju pomoči prek zn dokazuje, da je to najučinkovitejša in najuspešnejša možnost? (b) ali ureditve spremljanja zagotavljajo trdnost finančnih postopkov in doseganje rezultatov?
12. the consequence of weak procedures is a risk of a reduction in the efficiency and effectiveness of commission spending. the second phase of the audit, to be reported on at a later date, will assess the extent to which this risk materialises. 
12. če so postopki šibki, obstaja tveganje, da se zmanjšata učinkovitost in uspešnost porabe sredstev komisije. v drugi fazi revizije, o kateri bomo poročali pozneje, bomo ocenili, v kakšni meri se to tveganje uresničuje.
13. the audit was based on: (a) an analysis of documentation, including the commission’s may 2008 evaluation of its cooperation with the Un and reports of the commission’s internal audit service (ias) on the implementation of the fafa in 2006, 2007 and 2009; (b) interviews with commission and Un staff at their headquarters in Brussels and new York; (c) on-the-spot visits to the occupied palestinian territory and sudan in order to corroborate the reliability of monitoring systems; (d) observation of the april 2008 fifth annual fafa working group in Vienna and the april 2009 sixth annual fafa working group in Brussels; (e) previous audits of the court in which Un actions were included; and (f) the results of 52 questionnaires, addressed to delegations in the case of Europeaid and desk officers in the case of Echo, concerning the reasons for working with the Un and the systems for monitoring implementation6. 
13. revizija je temeljila na: (a) analizi dokumentacije, ki je vključevala tudi oceno komisije o njenem sodelovanju z združenimi narodi iz maja 2008 in poročila službe komisije za notranjo revizijo (ias) o izvajanju sporazuma FaFa v letih 2006, 2007 in 2009; (b) pogovorih z uslužbenci komisije in zn na njunih sedežih v Bruslju in new Yorku; (c) obiskih na kraju samem zasedenega palestinskega ozemlja in sudana, katerih namen je bil potrditi zanesljivost sistemov spremljanja; (d) opazovanju pete letne delovne skupine FaFa aprila 2008 na dunaju in šeste letne delovne skupine FaFa aprila 2009 v Bruslju; (e) prejšnjih revizijah sodišča, ki so zajemale dejavnosti združenih narodov, ter (f) na rezultatih 52 vprašalnikov o razlogih za sodelovanje z združenimi narodi in o sistemih za spremljanje izvajanja. vprašalniki so bili v primeru Europeaida naslovljeni na delegacije, v primeru gd Echo pa na pristojne uslužbence6.
6 the sample of 52 contracts with a total value of 764 million euro represented 7 % of the total number of contracts (741) agreed with the Un in 2006 and 2007 comprising 33 % of their total value (2 286 million euro). special report no 15/2009 - EU assistance implemented through United nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring 
6 vzorec 52 pogodb v skupni vrednosti 764 milijonov Eur je predstavljal 7 % celotnega števila pogodb (741), sklenjenih z zn v letih 2006 in 2007, in 33 % njihove skupne vrednosti (2 286 milijonov Eur). Posebno poročilo št. 15/2009 - Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje
13 chaptEr 3 oBsErVations SECTION 3.1 DECISIONS TO IMPLEMENT AID THROUGH THE UN 14. robust procedures for selecting the most appropriate aid delivery mechanism to achieve Ec policy objectives are necessary in order to ensure that the choice is based on the organisation’s capacity to carry out the task efficiently and effectively. the audit therefore examined whether the process for deciding to implement commission aid through the Un was objective and transparent and whether it demonstrated that this was the most efficient and effective option. in particular the audit examined whether decisions to fund Un organisations were informed by: (a) strategic policy guidelines requiring an assessment of the Un organisation’s suitability to carry out the proposed tasks; (b) a comparison with alternative aid delivery mechanisms. 
13 PoglavjE 3 oPažanja ODDELEK 3.1 ODLOČANJE O IZVAJANJU POMOČI PREK ZN 14. za izbiro mehanizma za zagotavljanje pomoči, ki je najustreznejši za izpolnjevanje ciljev politike Es, so potrebni trdni postopki, s katerimi je mogoče zagotoviti, da izbira temelji na sposobnosti organizacije za učinkovito in uspešno izvajanje naloge. zato se je pri reviziji preučilo, ali je postopek odločanja o izvajanju pomoči komisije prek zn objektiven in pregleden ter ali je bilo dokazano, da je to najučinkovitejša in najuspešnejša možnost.
STRATEGIC REQUIREMENTS INSUFFICIENTLY TRANSLATED INTO PRACTICE 15. in addition to the commitments of the European consensus (see paragraph 5), the 2001 commission communication on ‘Building an effective partnership with the United nations’ set out the commission’s strategy for funding aid through Un organisations7 and contained the following two main messages which remain preconditions of working with the Un: (a) the decision to fund a Un organisation should be based on its capacity to carry out the proposed task efficiently and effectively; and (b) through the provision of systematic rather than piecemeal funding, the commission should focus on results, rather than inputs, and ensure that Un reporting adequately demonstrates the achievement of well-defined objectives. 
STRATEŠKE ZAHTEVE NISO BILE ZADOSTNO PRENESENE V PRAKSO 15. Poleg zavez iz evropskega soglasja (glej odstavek 5) je strategijo komisije za financiranje pomoči prek organizacij zn določilo sporočilo komisije iz leta 2001 o razvijanju uspešnega partnerstva z združenimi narodi7. vsebovalo je naslednji glavni sporočili, ki ostajata predpogoja za sodelovanje z zn: (a) odločitev o financiranju organizacije zn mora temeljiti na sposobnosti te organizacije, da učinkovito in uspešno izvede predlagano nalogo, ter (b) komisija mora poskrbeti za sistematično, ne pa razdrobljeno financiranje, in se pri tem osredotočiti bolj na rezultate kot na vložke ter zagotoviti, da zn z ustreznim poročanjem dokažejo, da so dosegli natančno opredeljene cilje.
7 com(2001) 231 of 2.5.2001 ‘Building an effective partnership with the United nations in the fields of development and humanitarianaffairs’.thesubsequent communication com(2003) 526 of 10.9.2003 ‘the European Union and the United nations: the choice of multilateralism’ discussed how the EU council, member states and commission could make the EU more effective in shaping Un policy, but did not revise the strategy concerning cooperation in the development and humanitarian fields. these two communications are complemented by strategic partnership agreements with a number of Un organisations. special report no 15/2009 - EU assistance implemented through United nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring 
7 com(2001) 231 z dne 2. maja 2001 gradimo učinkovito partnerstvo z združenimi narodi na področju razvoja in humanitarnih dejavnosti. kasnejše sporočilo com(2003) 526 z dne 10. septembra 2003 Evropska unija in združeni narodi: izbira multilateralizma govori o tem, kaj lahko svet Eu, države članice in komisija storijo za to, da bi bila Evropska unija uspešnejša pri oblikovanju politike zn, vendar pa ne spreminja strategije sodelovanja na področju razvoja in humanitarnih dejavnosti. Ti dve sporočili dopolnjujejo sporazumi o strateškem partnerstvu s številnimi organizacijami zn. Posebno poročilo št.
16. the commission’s strategy with regard to EU assistance funded through Un organisations covered both development cooperation and humanitarian aid. it suggested that cooperation should focus on the six thematic areas identified as a priority for all development aid in the november 2000 statement by the council and the commission on ‘the European community’s development policy’8. however, in 2007 over half the commission funding through the Un related to dealing with crises (mainly post-crisis humanitarian aid, rehabilitation and recovery), rather than the six thematic areas identified in the communication. some 40 % of commission aid through the Un was spent on these six areas9, considerably less than the proportion of global commission aid, which amounted to almost 80 %10. it is not clear what added value the focus on thematic areas brings because it appears not to be followed in practice. 
15/2009 - Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje 16. strategija komisije v zvezi s pomočjo Eu, ki se financira prek organizacij zn, pokriva tako sodelovanje pri razvoju kot humanitarno pomoč. s to strategijo je bilo nakazano, da se mora sodelovanje osredotočiti na šest tematskih področij, ki so v izjavi sveta in komisije iz novembra 2000 o razvojni politiki Evropske skupnosti opredeljena kot prednostna za vso razvojno pomoč8. vendar pa je bila v letu 2007 več kot polovica sredstev, ki jih je komisija posredovala prek zn, povezana z reševanjem kriz (večinoma kot humanitarna pomoč v razmerah po krizi, za sanacijo in okrevanje) in ne s šestimi tematskimi področji, navedenimi v sporočilu. za omenjenih šest področij je bilo porabljenih približno 40 % pomoči komisije prek zn9, kar je znatno manj od ustreznega deleža pri globalni pomoči komisije, ki je znašal skoraj 80 %10. ni jasno, kakšno dodano vrednost prinaša osredotočenost na tematska področja, saj se zdi, da se ji v praksi ne sledi.
17. the strategic requirements are insufficiently translated into practical criteria for assessing the advantages and disadvantages of working with Un organisations. the commission has carried out retrospective analysis which shows that there are good reasons for implementing aid through the Un (see paragraph 20) and that the commission was satisfied with its choices (see paragraph 27). however, before deciding to work with a Un organisation, the commission does not systematically document its assessment of whether the added value of the Un offsets any disadvantages. 
17. strateške zahteve so v premajhni meri prenesene v praktična merila za ocenjevanje prednosti in pomanjkljivosti sodelovanja z organizacijami zn. komisija je izvedla retrospektivno analizo, ki je pokazala, da obstajajo dobri razlogi za izvajanje pomoči prek združenih narodov (glej odstavek 20) in da je bila komisija s svojimi odločitvami zadovoljna (glej odstavek 27). vendar komisija pred odločitvijo o sodelovanju z eno od organizacij zn ne dokumentira sistematično svoje ocene, ali dodana vrednost sodelovanja z zn odtehta morebitne pomanjkljivosti.
Before contracting with a Un organisation, Europeaid does not systematically carry out a documented assessment of its suitability to implement the proposed task. information on past performance, including the findings of results-oriented monitoring, is available to delegations through the cris database, and, since 2008, the twice-yearly external assistance management reports (Eamrs) include a specific section on international organisations. however, the information is not currently analysed and communicated to delegations in a way which could more usefully inform such assessments. one of the purposes of the commission’s evaluation in 2008 was to establish whether there were clear reasons for implementing aid through the Un. 
Europeaid pred sklenitvijo pogodbe z določeno organizacijo zn ne izvaja sistematično dokumentirane ocene primernosti te organizacije za izvedbo predlagane naloge. informacije o preteklem delovanju, vključno z ugotovitvami sistema spremljanja, usmerjenega v rezultate, so delegacijam na voljo prek zbirke podatkov cris, od leta 2008 pa imajo polletna poročila o upravljanju zunanje pomoči (Eamr) tudi poseben oddelek o mednarodnih organizacijah. Toda informacije se ne analizirajo sproti in se ne sporočajo delegacijam v obliki, ki bi lahko bolj učinkovito pripomogla k takšnim ocenam.
Europeaid has also carried out surveys to establish why Un organisations have been selected as partners. 
Tudi Europeaid je izvedel raziskave, s katerimi je skušal ugotoviti, zakaj so bile kot partnerji izbrane organizacije zn.
8 the six priority areas were: (i) trade and development; (ii) regional integration and cooperation; (iii) macroeconomic policies and social sector support ; (iv) transport; (v) food security and sustainable rural development; (vi) institutional capacity building. 
8 Šest prednostnih področij je bilo: (i) trgovina in razvoj, (ii) regionalno povezovanje in sodelovanje, (iii) makroekonomska politika in podpora socialnemu sektorju, (iv) promet, (v) varnost hrane in trajnostni razvoj podeželja, vi) krepitev institucionalnih zmogljivosti.
9 United nations: improving lives — results from the partnership of the United nations and the European commission in 2007. 
9 združeni narodi: izboljšujemo življenja – rezultati partnerstva med združenimi narodi in Evropsko komisijo v letu 2007.
10 Europeaid cooperation office: annual report 2008 on the Ec’s development and external assistance policies and their implementation in 2007. 14 special report no 15/2009 - EU assistance implemented through United nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring 
10 urad za sodelovanje Europeaid: letno poročilo iz leta 2008 o politikah razvoja in zunanje pomoči Es ter o njihovem izvajanju v letu 2007. 14 Posebno poročilo št. 15/2009 - Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje
Because of the urgent character of its interventions, Echo enters into framework agreements with all its partners, having first assessed their suitability. in addition, before entering into an agreement for a specific intervention, it systematically carries out and documents an appraisal of the capacity of the partner for the specific action proposed. however, the useful information on past performance of Un partners, contained in Echo’s project monitoring system, is stored at the level of operational units rather than being made readily available to all desks to inform decisions on funding Un organisations. consequently, Echo’s assessment process may be based on incomplete information and so the partner may not have the capacity to deliver the expected results, particularly where it diversifies outside its core activity. 
19. ker so posegi gd Echo po svoji naravi nujni, ta s svojimi partnerji vedno sklene okvirni sporazum, potem ko oceni njihovo primer-nost. Poleg tega pred sklenitvijo sporazuma o določenem posegu sistematično izvede in dokumentira oceno sposobnosti partnerja za izvajanje predlaganega ukrepa. vendar pa koristne informacije o preteklem delu partnerjev iz zn, ki so zajete v sistem gd Echo za spremljanje projektov, ostajajo shranjene na ravni operativnih enot, namesto da bi bile na voljo vsem uradom v pomoč pri odločitvah o financiranju organizacij zn.
20. the court’s questionnaires (see paragraph 13) aimed to identify, for each of the 52 contribution agreements, the three main reasons for choosing to work with the Un. the relative importance of the reasons for selecting the Un are summarised in Figure 4. the results of the questionnaires confirmed the findings of the commission’s evaluation and surveys that the commission chooses to work with the Un primarily for attributes linked to its capacity to deliver, such as its experience, expertise, logistical capacity (including access to insecure zones) and past performance. another reason why the commission chooses the Un is its capacity for coordination and high-level dialogue. 
20. z vprašalniki sodišča (glej odstavek 13) se je za vsakega od 52 sporazumov o prispevku skušalo ugotoviti tri glavne razloge za odločitev o sodelovanju z zn. relativno pomembnost razlogov za izbiro združenih narodov prikazuje diagram 4. rezultati vprašalnikov so potrdili ugotovitve ocene in raziskav komisije, da se komisija odloči za sodelovanje z zn zlasti zaradi njihovih značilnosti, ki so povezane s sposobnostjo za izvajanje nalog, kot so na primer izkušenost, strokovno znanje, logistične zmogljivosti (vključno z dostopom do nevarnih območij) in pretekla uspešnost. dodaten razlog za to, da komisija izbere zn, pa je njihova sposobnost usklajevanja in dialoga na visoki ravni.