natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In another case co-financed by the cf in spain, a dam was built to cover a future demand estimated at 13,9 hm3/year, without considering the resources that were already available (8 hm3/year). at the time of the audit, this dam was not necessary to cover the current demand of the area (8 hm3/year) as available resources were already sufficient. the co-financed infrastructure will be used as a reserve or for other areas and not as initially planned. special report no 9/2010 – Is EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? 
Štiri leta po začetku obratovanja znaša stopnja uporabe novih zmogljivosti okoli 16 %. v drugem primeru, ki ga je v Španiji sofinanciral kohezijski sklad, je bil zgrajen jez za zadovoljitev prihodnjega povpraševanja, ki je bilo ocenjeno na 13,9 hm3 na leto, ne da bi pri tem upoštevali že dostopne vire (8 hm3 na leto). v času revizije jez za zadovoljevanje trenutnega povpraševanja na zadevnem območju ni bil potreben (8 hm3 na leto), ker so zadostovali že dostopni viri. Sofinancirana infrastruktura bo uporabljena kot rezerva za druga območja in ne za prvotni namen. posebno poročilo št. 9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito?
19 thE focus Is on buIldInG InfrastructurEs to ExPloIt nEW WatEr sourcEs and attEntIon Is rarEly PaId to othEr solutIons, such as rEducInG WatEr lossEs, ... 
19 POUdarek je na IzGradnjI InfrastrUktUre za IzkOrIščanje nOVIh VOdnIh VIrOV, POzOrnOst Pa se redkO namenI drUGIm rešItVam, kOt sta zmanjšeVanje IzGUbe VOde ...
25. In all the cases examined by the court, the solution selected to tackle the estimated water deficit was to exploit new water sources and transport the water to the areas concerned17. 
25. v vseh primerih, ki jih je pregledalo Sodišče, je bila izbrana rešitev za spopadanje z ocenjenim primanjkljajem vode izkoriščanje novih vodnih virov in prenos vode na zadevna območja17.
26. where the level of non-invoiced water was high, the possibility of improving the distribution networks was rarely considered as a means of reducing future water needs, thereby excluding potential smaller capacity solutions (see Box 3). 
26. kjer je bila količina nezaračunane vode velika, se je za zmanjševanje prihodnjih potreb po vodi redko upoštevala možnost izboljšave distribucijskih omrežij, s čimer so bile izključene potencialne rešitve manjše zmogljivosti (glej okvir 3).
27. In two cases, however, municipalities have taken action to reduce demand. In these cases, the results have been so significant that the co-financed infrastructure has become unnecessary in the short term or is oversized (see Box 4). 
27. v dveh primerih pa sta občini sprejeli ukrepe za zmanjševanje povpraševanja. v obeh so bili rezultati tako dobri, da sofinancirana infrastruktura kratkoročno sploh ni potrebna ali je prevelika (glej okvir 4).
lImItEd ValuE Was addEd by thE Grant aPPlIcatIons’ aPPraIsal by thE commIssIon and thE mEmbEr statEs’ manaGInG authorItIEs 29. the audit sample includes nine cf projects and two Erdf major projects which were examined and approved by the commission. the other 18 projects were co-financed by the Erdf and were approved by the Member states’ managing authorities (see paragraph 8). 
OcenjeVanje VlOG za dOnacIje, kI sO Ga IzVedlI kOmIsIja In OrGanI UPraVljanja držaV članIc, je PrIneslO OmejenO dOdanO VrednOst 29. v revizijski vzorec je bilo zajetih devet projektov kohezijskega sklada in dva velika projekta eSrr, ki jih je preučila in odobrila komisija. ostalih 18 projektov je sofinanciral eSrr, odobrili pa so jih organi upravljanja držav članic (glej odstavek 8).
30. as already found in other court reports18, the absence of guidance and checklists for assessing the grant applications in the 2000–06 programme period meant that it was not possible to identify the checks carried out by the commission. 31. 
30. kot je Sodišče ugotovilo že v drugih poročilih18, zaradi pomanjkanja navodil in kontrolnih seznamov za ocenjevanje vlog za donacije v programskem obdobju 2000–2006 ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, katere preglede je izvedla komisija.
In no cases did the commission question the forecasts of future demand or the solutions chosen; nor did it ask for information about other potential solutions, such as accessing or treating water available nearby rather than extracting it from further away. 
31. komisija v nobenem primeru ni podvomila v napovedi prihodnjega povpraševanja ali izbrane rešitve niti ni prosila za informacije o drugih mogočih rešitvah, kot je dostop do bližnjih vodnih virov ali čiščenje vode iz teh virov namesto črpanja na bolj oddaljenih lokacijah.
32. following its review, the commission imposed conditions on four projects, relating to the reduction of water losses. however, in one case the commission did not quantify the objectives concerned; in another case, the deadlines for meeting them were set for after the completion date of the project, by which time the balance of the grant would have been paid. In no case was the effect of the required reduction in water losses taken into account in the calculation of water needs. 
32. komisija je po pregledu za štiri projekte postavila pogoje, ki so se nanašali na zmanjšanje izgub vode. vendar v enem primeru ni količinsko opredelila ciljev, v drugem primeru pa je kot rok za doseganje teh ciljev določila datum po zaključku projekta, ko bi bila izplačana že celotna donacija. v nobenem primeru pri izračunu potreb po vodi ni bilo upoštevano zahtevano zmanjšanje izgub vode.
33. In two of these projects, the grant decision also included a provision to the effect that the authorities had to monitor the application of the directives on the protection of surface and underground waters19 and inform the cf Monitoring committee. these provisions had the merit of creating a specific link between the payment of the grant and the required action. however, contamination by nitrates or waste water also affected other projects, which were designed partly to replace the contaminated sources and which were approved by the commission without any condition. further measures aiming at speeding up environmental recovery were never imposed as conditions for the EU grant. 
33. pri dveh od teh projektov je sklep o donaciji vseboval tudi določbo o tem, da morajo organi nadzorovati uporabo direktiv o varstvu površinskih voda in podtalnice19 ter obveščati nadzorni odbor za kohezijski sklad. S temi določbami se je ustvarila posebna povezava med plačilom donacije in potrebnimi ukrepi. vendar je onesnaževanje z nitrati ali odpadno vodo vplivalo tudi na druge projekte, ki so bili deloma načrtovani kot nadomestilo za onesnažene vire in ki jih je komisija odobrila brez pogojev. dodatni ukrepi za pospeševanje sanacije okolja nikoli niso bili postavljeni kot pogoj za donacijo eu.
18 see in particular paragraph 41 of special report no 3/2009 concerning the effectiveness of structural measures spending on waste water treatment for the 1994–99 and 2000–06 programme periods. 
18 glej predvsem odstavek 41 posebnega poročila št. 3/2009 – uspešnost porabe iz strukturnih ukrepov za čiščenje odpadne vode za programski obdobji 1994–1999 in 2000–2006.
19 council directive 91/676/Ecc of 12 december 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates and council directive 91/271/EEc of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment. 
19 direktiva Sveta 91/676/egS z dne 12. decembra 1991 o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati in direktiva Sveta 91/271/egS z dne 21. maja 1991 o čiščenju komunalne odpadne vode.
In the Member states, the court’s review found that, in no case did managing authorities suggest or make changes to the project proposals. conditions about water losses and savings, as well as measures to protect the quality of raw water, were never imposed. 
Sodišče je pri pregledih v državah članicah ugotovilo, da organi upravljanja v nobenem primeru niso predlagali sprememb predlogov projektov, niti jih niso sami spreminjali. pogoji v zvezi z izgubami vode, varčevanjem z vodo in zahteve po uvedbi ukrepov za zaščito kakovosti neobdelane vode niso bili postavljeni.
35. for the 2007–13 period, the way water supply projects are managed has changed: (a) at the commission, only projects whose total cost exceeds 50 million euro are examined. new assessment procedures have been designed: project applications have to include the results of feasibility studies, including the examination of alternatives; a checklist has been developed in order to assess project applications, in particular regarding the efficiency of water resource management (e.g. actions to reduce consumption or reuse waste water) in the areas concerned by the projects. however, the use of assessment criteria could improve the effectiveness of these procedures and the consistency of their results; (b) as regards the Member states visited, some positive initiatives have been taken: in three regions, one of the criteria for allocating Erdf assistance is that the proposed project should be part of a strategic plan for the area concerned and that it should be complementary to bulk water systems already built or planned. 
35. za obdobje 2007–2013 se je način upravljanja projektov oskrbe z vodo spremenil: (a) komisija preuči le projekte, katerih skupni stroški presegajo 50 milijonov eur. določeni so novi ocenjevalni postopki: projektne vloge morajo vsebovati rezultate študij izvedljivosti, vključno s pregledom alternativnih rešitev; sestavljen je kontrolni seznam za ocenjevanje vlog, predvsem z vidika učinkovitosti upravljanja vodnih virov (npr. ukrepi za zmanjševanje porabe ali ponovno uporabo odpadne vode) na območjih, ki jih zadevajo projekti. vendar bi lahko uporaba ocenjevalnih meril izboljšala uspešnost teh postopkov in doslednost njihovih rezultatov; (b) v obiskanih državah članicah so sprejeli nekaj pozitivnih pobud: v treh regijah je eden od pogojev za dodeljevanje pomoči iz eSrr, da mora biti predlagani projekt vključen v strateški načrt za zadevno območje in da mora dopolnjevati že zgrajene ali načrtovane sisteme množične oskrbe z vodo. v Italiji novi postopki predvidevajo povečanje proračunov regionalnih operativnih programov, ki dosegajo boljše rezultate pri zmanjševanju izgube vode. 22 posebno poročilo št. 9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito?
haVE thE ProjEcts achIEVEd thEIr aIms of ImProVInG thE suPPly of WatEr for domEstIc consumPtIon? 36. there can be many reasons for building new infrastructure (see paragraph 5) and project objectives can therefore vary significantly. to enable effective monitoring and evaluation, project objectives should be defined and quantified in grant applications and financing decisions, in terms of outputs and results. 
36. za izgradnjo nove infrastrukture je lahko veliko razlogov (glej odstavek 5), zato se lahko cilji projektov precej razlikujejo. da bi omogočili uspešno spremljanje in vrednotenje, je treba v vlogah za dodelitev donacij in sklepih o financiranju jasno določiti in količinsko opredeliti cilje projektov v smislu izložkov in rezultatov.
37. a range of indicators can be used to assess the extent to which objectives have been achieved. while output indicators should be defined in terms of physical achievements, such as kilometres of pipeline, number of tanks, etc., result indicators should be defined in order to reflect the extent to which the specific needs addressed by the project have been met: (a) availability: the additional volume of water entering the supply system due to the new infrastructure; (b) coverage: the increase in the number of people and percentage of the population supplied by the water distribution network; (c) water quality: the percentage of tests where water was assessed as non-compliant with EU, national or local standards and the improvement of the values for the parameters which were previously non-compliant; (d) efficiency of the systems: the reduction of non-invoiced water; (e) service quality: the reduction in the number and duration of restrictions and interruptions to the service. 
37. za oceno, v kolikšni meri so bili cilji doseženi, se lahko uporabi več različnih kazalnikov. Medtem ko bi morali biti kazalniki za izložke opredeljeni v smislu fizičnih dosežkov, kot so na primer kilometri vodovoda, število rezervoarjev itn., bi bilo treba kazalnike rezultatov opredeliti tako, da bi odražali, v kolikšni meri so bile dejansko zadovoljene specifične potrebe, ki jih je obravnaval projekt: (a) razpoložljivost: dodatna količina vode v sistemu za oskrbo zaradi nove infrastrukture; (b) pokritost: povečanje števila ljudi in deleža prebivalstva, ki se oskrbuje iz distribucijskega omrežja za vodo; (c) kakovost vode: delež testov, kjer je bila voda ocenjena kot neskladna s standardi eu, nacionalnimi in lokalnimi standardi ter izboljšanje vrednosti parametrov, ki prej niso bili skladni s standardi; (d) učinkovitost sistemov: zmanjšanje količine nezaračunane vode; (e) kakovost storitev: zmanjšanje števila in trajanja omejitev in prekinitev pri storitvah.
38. the court examined whether: (a) objectives had been defined and quantified; (b) objectives had been achieved; (c) achievements had been monitored by the authorities which approved the grants. 
38. Sodišče je preučilo, ali: (a) so bili cilji jasno določeni in količinsko opredeljeni, (b) so bili cilji doseženi, (c) so organi, ki so odobrili donacije, spremljali dosežke. cIljI PrOjektOV nIsO bIlI VednO kOlIčInskO OPredeljenI Glede na PrIčakOVane rezUltate 39. v vlogah za donacije in sklepih o donacijah so bili navedeni merljivi izložki, ki jih je treba doseči. za nekatere pregledane projekte so bili izložki načrtovani in količinsko opredeljeni v projektnih študijah, ker zanje ni posebnih vlog ali sklepov.
40. Most of the projects examined included overall measurable objectives established in terms of population to be covered and volume of water to be supplied. however, not all expected results (such as reducing the quantity of non-invoiced water and improving service continuity and water quality) were quantified. 
40. večina pregledanih projektov je vsebovala splošne merljive cilje, določene glede na prebivalstvo, ki ga je treba pokriti, in količino vode za oskrbo. vendar vsi pričakovani rezultati niso bili količinsko opredeljeni (kot na primer zmanjšanje količine nezaračunane vode in izboljšanje neprekinjenosti storitev in kakovosti vode).
41. all projects audited, despite delays and cost overruns (see paragraphs 51 to 52), were physically implemented as planned, with minor variations in, for example, the length of the pipelines or the capacity or location of the tanks, agreed during construction. 
PrOjektI sO dOseGlI merljIVe IzbOljšaVe PrI OskrbI držaVljanOV eU z VOdO, Vendar ... 41. vsi revidirani projekti so bili kljub zamudam in prekoračitvi stroškov (glej odstavka 51 in 52) fizično izvedeni po načrtih z manjšimi odstopanji, dogovorjenimi med izgradnjo, na primer spremembe pri dolžini vodovoda, zmogljivosti ali lokaciji rezervoarjev.
42. In terms of results, projects have contributed to improving the supply of water for domestic use, either by increasing the available volume of water, extending the public network to areas which were previously not connected or improving water quality, network efficiency or service continuity (see Box 6). 
42. kar zadeva rezultate, so projekti pripomogli k izboljšanju oskrbe z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo s povečanjem količine razpoložljive vode, s širitvijo javnega omrežja na območja, ki prej z njim niso bila povezana, ali z izboljšanjem kakovosti vode, učinkovitosti omrežja ali neprekinjenosti storitev (glej okvir 6).
Picture 5: Water feeding a new water main increasing Picture 6: New treatment plant improving water quality availability in an Italian region in a big Greek city box 6 25 ExamPlEs of PosItIVE achIEVEmEnts In order to cover the water deficit of a spanish area, the cf co-financed a desalination plant with a production capacity of 22 hm3 of drinking water per year. since 2006, the plant has been operating at around 90 % of its capacity, alleviating the water deficit of the three largest municipalities supplied. compared to the previous situation, significant improvement has also been achieved in the quality of the water distributed to the population in terms of some of the standards of the EU directive (conductivity and content in trihalomethanes and sulphates). 
9/2010 – Ali so sredstva eu iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito? Fotografija 5: voda, ki teče v novi vodovod, ki je povečal Fotografija 6: nova čistilna naprava za izboljšanje kakovosti razpoložljivost v neki italijanski regiji vode v nekem velikem grškem mestu OkVIr 6 25 PrImera POzItIVnIh dOsežkOV da bi pokrili primanjkljaj vode na nekem območju v Španiji, je kohezijski sklad sofinanciral izgradnjo obrata za razsoljevanje s proizvodno zmogljivostjo 22 hm3 pitne vode na leto. od leta 2006 obrat deluje s približno 90-odstotno zmogljivostjo in tako blaži primanjkljaj vode v treh največjih občinah, ki se oskrbujejo iz njega. v primerjavi s prejšnjim stanjem se je precej izboljšala tudi kakovost distribuirane vode za prebivalce v skladu z nekaterimi standardi direktive eu (prevodnost in vsebnost trihalometanov in sulfatov). da bi zadovoljili potrebe nekega urbanega območja v Italiji s pomanjkanjem vode, je eSrr sofinanciral vodovod za prenos vode od novega jeza do več občin. za obdobje 2004–2008 je bila letna razpoložljiva količina vode za to območje 14,5 hm3.
26 ... somE ProjEcts WErE not In oPEratIon bEcausE of mIssInG lInks ... 
26 ... nekaterI PrOjektI nIsO ObratOValI zaradI manjkajOčIh POVezaV, ...
43. five projects, although physically completed between 2005 and 2008, had not delivered any results by the time of the audit20. two other projects completed in the same period have become partially operational, but with limited results. the main reason for this was the lack of complementary infrastructure, delayed either in its construction or entry into service (see Box 7). ... and othEr ProjEcts contaInEd InhErEnt lImItatIons 44. 
43. pet projektov v času, ko je bila izvedena revizija, še ni prinašalo rezultatov, čeprav so bili fizično dokončani med letoma 2005 in 200820. dva druga projekta, ki sta bila dokončana v istem obdobju, delno že obratujeta, vendar z omejenimi rezultati. glavni razlog za to je pomanjkanje dopolnilne infrastrukture, pri kateri je prišlo do zamud pri izgradnji ali začetku obratovanja (glej okvir 7). .... drUGI PrOjektI Pa sO VsebOValI Inherentne OmejItVe 44. v nekaterih primerih na doseganje rezultatov vplivajo inherentne omejitve projektov: pri enem projektu na primer, ki je bil načrtovan za izboljšanje kakovosti vode v nekem velikem mestu, je doseganje najboljše mogoče kakovosti odvisno od drugih okoljsko spornih projektov. v dveh drugih primerih voda v zgrajene čistilne naprave priteka po odprtih kanalih, zaradi česar je izpostavljena onesnaženju. v enem primeru voda iz obrata za razsoljevanje v občinska vodna zajetja priteče s previsoko temperaturo za gospodinjsko uporabo (včasih več kot 30 stopinj).
20 a similar case had been observed in a statement of assurance exercise (see annual report 2008, paragraph 6.19). 
20 podoben primer je bil opažen med pripravo izjave o zanesljivosti (glej letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavek 6.19).
It concerns a water main which was physically completed in 2004 but was not in use at the beginning of 2009, due to lack of water in the reservoir feeding the water main. box 7 ExamPlEs of ProjEcts not In oPEratIon bEcausE of mIssInG lInks In spain, less than 20 % of the capacity of a desalination plant was being used four years after completion. despite there being sufficient demand to warrant increased water production, the conveyance system and urban distribution (and irrigation) networks, also co-financed by EU funds, were not in place at the time of the audit. four years after the construction of a dam in greece, the complementary treatment plant required to make the project operational needs to be redesigned and constructed, thus delaying the functioning of the system. special report no 9/2010 – Is EU structural measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect? 
Nanaša se na vodovod, ki je bil fizično zgrajen leta 2004, vendar še na začetku leta 2009 zaradi pomanjkanja vode v vodnem zajetju, iz katerega se napaja, ni obratoval. OkVIr 7 PrImera PrOjektOV, kI ne ObratUjeta zaradI manjkajOčIh POVezaV v Španiji je bilo štiri leta po izgradnji obrata za razsoljevanje izkoriščenih le 20 % njegove zmogljivosti. čeprav je bilo dovolj povpraševanja za utemeljitev povečane proizvodnje vode, v času revizije še ni bilo sistemov za prenos in omrežij za mestno distribucijo (in namakanje), ki so bili tudi sofinancirani s sredstvi eu.
27 rEPortInG on achIEVEmEnts has bEEn of lImItEd ValuE 45. for commission-managed cf projects (see paragraph 29), a final report has to be presented at completion as a condition for final payment; for Erdf major projects, the regulation only requires information to be provided in the reports of the operational programme where these projects are included. 
27 POrOčanje O dOsežkIh je ImelO OmejenO VrednOst 45. za projekte kohezijskega sklada, ki jih je upravljala komisija (glej odstavek 29), je treba ob zaključku predložiti končno poročilo, kar je pogoj za končno plačilo. za velike projekte eSrr uredba zahteva samo, da se podatki navedejo v poročilih operativnih programov, v katere so ti projekti vključeni.
In two cases, the final reports merely state that the results have been achieved and, in one case, no information is provided. In five projects, no results could be provided as, although the projects had been completed, they were not yet operational when the final report was presented. 47. as regards the additional conditions on reduction of water losses imposed by the commission (see paragraph 32), in one of the four cases, the report does not contain any information on the extent to which the commission’s condition had been met. nevertheless, the commission made the final payment. 
47. kar zadeva dodatne pogoje v zvezi z zmanjševanjem izgub vode, ki jih je postavila komisija (glej odstavek 32), poročilo v enem od štirih primerov ne vsebuje nobenih podatkov o tem, v kolikšnem obsegu so bili izpolnjeni pogoji komisije. komisija je kljub temu izvršila končno plačilo. v dveh primerih, v katerih je komisija določila specifične zahteve v zvezi z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem, zlasti glede izvajanja ukrepov proti kmetijskemu onesnaževanju ali onesnaževanju zaradi odpadne vode (glej odstavek 33), niso bili predloženi nobeni podatki.
In the two cases where the commission had imposed specific follow-up requirements, in particular regarding the application of measures against contamination from agriculture or waste water (see paragraph 33), no information was provided. 48. so far as projects subject only to Member state approval were concerned, only in two of the Member states covered by the audit were beneficiaries required to submit a final report with the final payment claim. 
48. pri projektih, ki so jih morale odobriti samo države članice, so morali upravičenci samo v dveh revidiranih državah članicah predložiti končno poročilo z zahtevkom za končno plačilo. v teh poročilih so poleg tega navedene glavne spremembe, ki so vplivale na stroške projekta in zamude, podrobnosti o doseženih rezultatih pa ne. v drugih dveh državah članicah so zahtevkom za končno plačilo priložena le dokazila o nastalih odhodkih. posebno poročilo št.
haVE thE rEsults bEEn achIEVEd at thE loWEst cost to thE Eu budGEt? 
alI sO bIlI rezUltatI dOseženI z najnIžjImI mOGOčImI strOškI za PrOračUn eU?
Most of the co-financed projects have contributed towards improving the supply of water to EU citizens. 
49. večina sofinanciranih projektov je prispevala k izboljšanju oskrbe državljanov eu z vodo.