natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
93 The institutions in the same location established inter-institutional working groups where they discuss strategic property issues. 
93 Institucije na isti lokaciji so ustanovile medinstitucionalne delovne skupine, v katerih razpravljajo o strateških nepremičninskih vprašanjih.
This cooperation enabled institutions to share, take-over or sub-let properties. 
To sodelovanje institucijam omogoča deljenje, prevzeme ali nadaljnje oddajanje nepremičnin.
It resulted in setting-up several inter-institutional tendering procedures for supplies of goods and services linked to the operation of the buildings portfolios (see paragraphs 20 to 22). 43 
Posledično je bilo pripravljenih več medinstitucionalnih postopkov javnega naročanja za nakup blaga in storitev, povezanih z upravljanjem portfeljev nepremičnin (glej odstavke 20 do 22). 42
Recommendation 1 – The institutions69 should update and formalise their building strategies and regularly update planning documents The institutions should define their main decision-making principles in building strategies, which should be approved by management and reflect the latest evolution in the institutions’ mandate, policies and objectives. 
Priporočilo 1 – Institucije69 naj posodobijo in uradno potrdijo svoje nepremičninske strategije ter redno posodabljajo dokumente za načrtovanje Institucije bi morale v nepremičninskih strategijah, ki bi jih moralo odobriti vodstvo in bi morale odražati zadnji razvoj mandatov, politik in ciljev v institucijah, opredeliti svoja glavna načela odločanja.
The institutions should complement their building strategies by medium-term planning, which - are regularly updated based on the evolution in the needs and in available office accommodation, and - include the analysis of various development options (“scenario planning”). 
Institucije bi morale svoje nepremičninske strategije dopolniti s srednjeročnim načrtovanjem, ki: – se redno posodablja na podlagi razvoja potreb in razpoložljivih pisarniških prostorov ter – vključuje analizo različnih razvojnih možnosti („načrtovanje scenarijev”).
Timeframe for implementation: by the end of 2020. 
Časovni okvir za uresničitev: do konca leta 2019.
94 The institutions started introducing New Ways of Working (NWoW). 
94 Institucije so začele uvajati nove načine dela.
Some aspects, such as teleworking and, in some occasions, collaborative working space have already been implemented. 
Nekateri vidiki, kot so delo na daljavo in, v nekaterih primerih, skupni delovni prostor, se že izvajajo.
However, results of surveys and evaluations of implemented projects were not available at the time of the audit (see paragraphs 23 to 27). 
Vendar rezultati raziskav in ocen izvedenih projektov v času revizije še niso bili na voljo (glej odstavke 23 do 27).
Recommendation 2 – The institutions should evaluate the New Ways of Working projects The institutions should (i) evaluate the results of implemented NWoW projects and (ii) integrate their results into strategic reflections on the development of their building strategies and Human Resources policies. 
Priporočilo 2 – Institucije naj ocenijo projekte novih načinov dela Institucije bi morale (i) oceniti rezultate izvedenih projektov novih načinov dela ter (ii) rezultate vključiti v strateške razmisleke o razvoju njihovih nepremičninskih strategij in politik na področju človeških virov.
Timeframe for implementation: (i) by the end of 2019 and (ii) by the end of 2020. 
Časovni okvir za uresničitev: (i) do konca leta 2019 in (ii) do konca leta 2020.
95 The host countries offered to the institutions preferential conditions for purchasing or renting office accommodation. 
95 Države gostiteljice so institucijam ponudile preferencialne pogoje za nakup ali najem pisarniških prostorov.
They also support the institutions in their major construction projects (see paragraphs 31 to 35). 
Poleg tega so jih podprle pri velikih gradbenih projektih (glej odstavke 31 do 35).
44 69 The Parliament, the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice and the ECB. 
43 69 Parlament, Svet, Komisija, Sodišče Evropske unije in ECB.
45 96 Overall, the decisions on obtaining office accommodation were well founded (see paragraphs 36 and 37). 
44 96 Na splošno so bile odločitve o pridobitvi pisarniških prostorov dobro utemeljene (glej odstavka 36 in 37).
97 For financing of large construction projects under our review, the institutions used complex mechanisms. 
97 Institucije so za financiranje velikih gradbenih projektov, ki jih je Sodišče pregledalo, uporabljale kompleksne mehanizme.
As a result, they are not directly in control of the financial aspects of the projects. 
Zato nimajo neposrednega nadzora nad finančnimi vidiki projektov.
The use of unused appropriations from other budget lines to make anticipated payments is a common practice when financing construction projects, however it affects budgetary transparency (see paragraphs 38 to 42). 
Uporaba neporabljenih proračunskih sredstev iz drugih proračunskih vrstic za predvidena plačila je splošna praksa pri financiranju gradbenih projektov, vendar vpliva na proračunsko preglednost (glej odstavke 38 do 42).
Recommendation 3 – The institutions should increase budgetary transparency of the financing mechanisms for construction projects. For the financing of construction projects, the institutions should aim for more budgetary transparency and less complexity. 
Priporočilo 3 – Institucije naj povečajo proračunsko preglednost mehanizmov za financiranje gradbenih projektov Institucije bi si morale pri financiranju gradbenih projektov prizadevati za večjo proračunsko preglednost in manjšo kompleksnost.
This could for instance be done by adequately disclosing the advance payments on building projects in the appropriate budget lines during the budgetary procedure. 
To bi na primer lahko dosegle tako, da bi med proračunskim postopkom v ustreznih proračunskih vrsticah primerno razkrile predplačila za gradbene projekte.
Timeframe for implementation: for projects starting after the end of 2019. 
Časovni okvir za uresničitev: za projekte, ki se bodo začeli izvajati po koncu leta 2019.
98 Institutions have different ways to manage their major construction projects. 
98 Institucije svoje velike gradbene projekte vodijo na različne načine.
Some delegated construction to the state, while others decided to manage the project internally with some external support. 
Nekatere so za gradnjo pooblastile državo, druge pa so se odločile za notranje vodenje projekta z določeno zunanjo pomočjo.
Most of the recent construction projects we analysed were affected by delays, mostly caused by unforeseen circumstances, which led to project changes. 
Na večino nedavnih gradbenih projektov, ki jih je Sodišče analiziralo, so vplivale zamude, ki so bile zlasti posledica nepredvidenih okoliščin, ki so vodile do sprememb projekta.
Other elements contributed to delays, for example in case of the Europa building project of the Council it was weaknesses in national authorities’ operational and administrative project management. 
Na zamude so vplivali še drugi dejavniki, v primeru gradbenega projekta Sveta za zgradbo Europa so to bile na primer pomanjkljivosti operativnega in upravnega vodenja projekta, ki so ga izvajali nacionalni organi.
At the beginning of the KAD II project the Parliament lacked necessary internal resources and expertise to manage such projects. 
Na začetku izvajanja projekta KAD II Parlament ni imel dovolj potrebnih notranjih virov in strokovnega znanja za vodenje takih projektov.
In two projects, the delays led to additional costs (see paragraphs 44 to 54). 
Pri dveh projektih so zamude pomenile dodatne stroške (glej odstavke 44 do 54).
Recommendation 4 – The institutions should set up adequate management procedures for large construction and renovation projects The institutions should set up adequate management procedures for large construction and renovation projects based on assessments of risks, which would ensure sufficient administrative and operational follow-up of the project and ensure that the financial costs linked to delays are minimalised. 
Priporočilo 4 – Institucije naj vzpostavijo ustrezne postopke vodenja velikih gradbenih projektov in projektov prenove Institucije bi morale vzpostaviti ustrezne postopke vodenja velikih gradbenih projektov in projektov prenove na podlagi ocene tveganja, s katerimi bi zagotovile, da se bo projekt primerno upravno in operativno spremljal ter da bodo finančni stroški, povezani z zamudami, čim manjši.
Timeframe for implementation: by the end of 2019. 
Časovni okvir za uresničitev: do konca leta 2019.
99 The institutions monitor each aspect of the building portfolio, such as facilities management, space allocation, energy consumption, financial, legal and accounting aspects, using a variety of IT systems and tools, but they do not regularly monitor indicators to assess the efficiency of their building portfolio for management purposes. 
99 Institucije z različnimi sistemi in orodji IT spremljajo vse vidike portfelja nepremičnin, kot so upravljanje objektov, dodeljevanje prostorov, poraba energije ter finančni, pravni in računovodski vidiki, vendar kazalnikov za oceno učinkovitosti svojega portfelja nepremičnin za namene upravljanja ne spremljajo redno.
We found a good practice for monitoring and reporting in the ECB (see paragraphs 56 to 62). 
Sodišče je dobro prakso spremljanja in poročanja ugotovilo v ECB (glej odstavke 56 do 62).
100 Although the institutions with their buildings in Brussels and Luxembourg adopted common Inter-institutional Measuring Code, due to differences in the detailed area categories adopted by each institutions, the collection of data for institutional comparison is difficult. 
100 Čeprav so institucije, ki imajo svoje zgradbe v Bruslju in Luxembourgu, sprejele skupne medinstitucionalne predpise za merjenje, je zbiranje podatkov za primerjavo med institucijami zaradi razlik v podrobnih kategorijah območij, ki so jih sprejele posamezne institucije, težko.
Differences in the IT systems used by the institutions and the two Commission’s offices (OIB and OIL) for space management also affect comparability of data. 
Na primerljivost podatkov vplivajo tudi različni sistemi IT, ki jih za upravljanje prostorov uporabljajo institucije in oba urada Komisije (OIB in OIL).
The annual reporting to the budgetary authorities on buildings does not allow for comparison namely because the institutions use different space categories (see paragraphs 63 to 69). 
Letno poročanje proračunskim organom, kar zadeva zgradbe, ne omogoča primerjave, saj institucije uporabljajo različne kategorije prostorov (glej odstavke 63 do 69).
101 The surface indicators we calculated show that the use of office space is comparable between institutions (see paragraphs 72 to 79). 
101 Iz izračunanih kazalnikov površin je razvidno, da je uporaba pisarniških prostorov med institucijami primerljiva (glej odstavke 72 do 79).
We found that the rents the institutions negotiated were generally below market levels (see paragraphs 80 to 82). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so bile najemnine, ki so jih institucije dosegle s pogajanji, na splošno nižje od tržnih ravni (glej odstavke 80 do 82).
We also found that the annual rents per person vary significantly per building (see paragraphs 83 to 86). 
Ugotovilo je tudi, da se letne najemnine na osebo med zgradbami znatno razlikujejo (glej odstavke 83 do 86).
The total cost per square meter of two recently constructed flagship buildings is higher than the cost of a standard office building (see paragraphs 87 to 89). 46 
Pri dveh nedavno zgrajenih prestižnih zgradbah so skupni stroški na kvadratni meter višji kot stroški standardne pisarniške zgradbe (glej odstavke 87 do 89). 45
Recommendation 5 – The institutions should improve consistency of data and monitoring of the buildings portfolio The institutions should: (a) develop indicators to monitor the efficiency of their buildings portfolio for their internal management purposes and for that use the potential of their IT tools; (b) adopt a common methodology for the calculation and presentation of surface area and cost indicators, and share such data on a regular basis in interinstitutional fora; (c) agree on a common methodology and presentation of the data in the annual reporting to the budgetary authorities in order to ensure comparability of information. 
Priporočilo 5 – Institucije naj izboljšajo skladnost podatkov in spremljanje portfelja nepremičnin Institucije bi morale: (a) razviti kazalnike za spremljanje učinkovitosti portfelja nepremičnin za namene notranjega upravljanja, za to pa izkoristiti možnosti svojih orodij IT; (b) sprejeti skupno metodologijo za izračun in predstavitev kazalnikov površin in stroškov ter te podatke redno izmenjevati v medinstitucionalnih forumih; (c) sprejeti dogovor o skupni metodologiji in predstavitvi podatkov v okviru letnega poročanja proračunskim organom, da bi zagotovile primerljivost informacij.
This Report was adopted by Chamber V, headed by Mr Lazaros S. LAZAROU, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 5 December 2018. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat V, ki ga vodi Lazaros S. LAZAROU, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 5. decembra 2018.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President 47 
Za Evropsko računsko sodišče Klaus-Heiner LEHNE Predsednik 46
1 Annexes Annex I — Calculation methodology for surface and cost indicators 01 In our questionnaire, we asked the institutions to provide us with data on surface and costs illustrating the situation as at the end of 2016. 
Priloge Annex I — Priloga I – Metodologija izračuna kazalnikov površin in stroškov 01 Sodišče je v vprašalniku institucije pozvalo, naj predložijo podatke o površinah in stroških, iz katerih je bilo razvidno stanje ob koncu leta 2016.
We based our calculations on the data provided. 
Izračuni so temeljili na podatkih, ki so jih predložile.
Surface indicators 02 The data on surface provided by the institutions was not directly comparable, mainly due to discrepancies in interpretation of terminology (net office area, gross office area). 
Kazalniki površin 02 Podatki o površinah, ki so jih predložile institucije, zlasti zaradi različne razlage terminologije (neto pisarniška površina, bruto pisarniška površina) niso bili neposredno primerljivi.
We therefore established our own definitions, which are close to those used by most institutions. 
Sodišče je zato določilo lastne opredelitve, podobne opredelitvam, ki jih je uporabljala večina institucij.
We requested additional data where necessary and adjusted the original data accordingly. 
Po potrebi je zaprosilo za dodatne podatke ter izvirne podatke ustrezno prilagodilo.
As no institutions except the ECB keep detailed historical data on surface, we could not analyse changes in the building portfolios over time. 
Ker z izjemo ECB nobena institucija ne shranjuje preteklih podatkov o površini, Sodišče ni moglo analizirati nastalih sprememb v portfeljih nepremičnin.
For the same reason, the additional data requested was not available at the end of 2016, but refers to the date of extraction from the systems in 2017. 
Iz istega razloga zahtevani dodatni podatki niso bili na voljo konec leta 2016, ampak so bili pridobljeni iz sistemov leta 2017.
03 For the purposes of our analysis, we established that the office surface includes individual and shared offices and collaborative space. 
03 Sodišče je za namene analize določilo, da površina pisarn vključuje lastne in skupne pisarne ter skupne prostore.
Offices used for other purposes, such as meetings or storage, are excluded. 
Pisarne, ki se uporabljajo za druge namene, na primer sestanke ali skladiščenje, so izključene.
Vacant offices and offices kept as buffer space are included in the office surface1. 04 The number of staff refers to the staff using the office space, including external consultants working on site. 
Prazne pisarne in pisarne, namenjene za rezervni prostor, so vključene v površino pisarn.1 04 Število zaposlenih pomeni zaposlene, ki uporabljajo pisarniški prostor, vključno z zunanjimi svetovalci, ki delajo na kraju samem.
05 We retained only buildings with at least 20 % office space. 
05 Sodišče je upoštevalo samo zgradbe z vsaj 20 % pisarniških prostorov.
We excluded from the analysis buildings that are not typical office buildings, such as warehouses, training centres and childcare facilities. 
Iz analize je izključilo zgradbe, ni niso običajne pisarniške zgradbe, kot so skladišča, središča za usposabljanje in ustanove za varstvo otrok.
For the analysis of the area efficiency ratios, we also Buffer space is space set aside in order to allow a certain degree of flexibility. 
Za analizo razmerij učinkovitosti območij je Rezervni prostor omogoča določeno stopnjo prilagodljivosti.
It is used for moves; renovations; unforeseen minor staff increases, etc. 1 SR-34 EN.docx 05/12/2018 
Uporablja se za selitve, prenove, manjša nepredvidena povečanja števila zaposlenih itd. 1 1
excluded unoccupied buildings. 
izključilo tudi nezasedene stavbe.
In the case of the Commission, we excluded office space occupied by executive agencies and other bodies (e.g. EEAS, EACEA). 
Pri Komisiji je izključilo pisarniški prostor, ki ga zasedajo izvajalske agencije in drugi organi (npr. ESZD in EACEA).
06 In the case of Parliament, we excluded buildings in Strasbourg from our analysis, as they are not permanently occupied and most staff assigned to those buildings have another office in one of the other seats of the Parliament2. 07 We calculated the indicators by dividing the office surface by the number of staff working in the building. 
06 Pri Parlamentu je Sodišče iz analize izključilo zgradbe v Strasbourgu, ker niso stalno zasedene, večina zaposlenih, ki so jim te zgradbe dodeljene, pa ima drugo pisarno na enem od drugih sedežev Parlamenta.2 07 Sodišče je kazalnike izračunalo tako, da je površino pisarn delilo s številom zaposlenih, ki delajo v zgradbi.
The weighted average ratios were calculated by dividing the total3 office surface by the total number of staff working in the buildings. 
Razmerja tehtanega povprečja so bila izračunana z deljenjem skupne površine3 pisarn s številom vseh zaposlenih, ki delajo v zgradbi.
Cost indicators Comparison with market rent 08 We based our analysis on publicly available market reports by real estate agents (e.g. Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) and BNP Paribas Real Estate). 
Kazalniki stroškov Primerjava s tržno najemnino 08 Analiza Sodišča je temeljila na poročilih o trgu, ki so jih objavile nepremičninske agencije (npr. Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) in BNP Paribas Real Estate).
The market reports mostly contain analyses of prime rent. 
Poročila o trgu vsebujejo zlasti analize referenčne najemnine.
JLL defines 4 the prime office rent as: o the top open market rent that could be expected for a notional office unit of the highest quality and specification in the best location in a market, as at the survey date (normally at the end of each quarter). 
Nepremičninska agencija JLL referenčno najemnino opredeljuje4 kot: o najvišjo najemnino na odprtem trgu, ki se lahko pričakuje za hipotetično pisarno najvišje kakovosti z najboljšimi specifikacijami na najboljši lokaciji na trgu na datum raziskave (običajno ob koncu posameznega četrtletja).
09 In order to take into account the fact that the buildings rented by the institutions are not always of the highest standard, we extended our analysis by comparing the rent with the average annual office rent applicable to the location. 
09 Sodišče je ob upoštevanju dejstva, da zgradbe, ki jih najemajo institucije, ne ustrezajo vedno najvišjim standardom, analizo razširilo tako, da je najemnino primerjalo s povprečno letno najemnino za pisarno, ki velja za lokacijo.
According to JLL5,the weighted average rent repres ents : In July 2014, the Court produced an analysis of potential savings to the EU budget if the European Parliament centralised its operations in Brussels (www.eca.europa.eu). 
Ker za Luxembourg informacije za analizirana leta niso bile na voljo, je Sodišče uporabilo Sodišče je julija 2014 analiziralo, kakšni bi bili prihranki v proračunu EU, če bi Evropski parlament svoje dejavnosti centraliziral v Bruslju (www.eca.europa.eu).
Either total for all buildings in the portfolio of one institution or total for all institutions combined. 
Skupna površina vseh zgradb v portfelju ene institucije ali skupna površina vseh institucij skupaj.
Source: JLL Office Market Report Luxembourg Q4 2015. 
Vir: Poročilo nepremičninske agencije JLL o pisarniškem trgu v Luxembourgu za zadnje četrtletje leta 2015 2 2 3 4
2 2 3 4 5 o the mean value of all known face rent6 achieved on leasing transactions completed within a market during the survey period weighted with the floor space. 
oceno. Po mnenju nepremičninske agencije JLL5 tehtana povprečna najemnina predstavlja: o srednjo vrednost vseh znanih nominalnih najemnin6, doseženih za posle zakupa, sklenjene na trgu v obdobju raziskave in utežene s površino.
10 Rent included in the market reports is based on the ‘face rent’. 
10 Najemnina, vključena v poročila o trgu, temelji na nominalni najemnini.
This rent does not take into account incentives provided by the property owner, such as a rent-free period or the contribution by the property owner to additional costs (e.g. refurbishment or additional technical improvements linked to security). 
Ta najemnina ne upošteva spodbud, ki jih zagotovi lastnik nepremičnine, kot je obdobje brez najemnine ali prispevek lastnika nepremičnine k dodatnim stroškom (npr. prenovi ali dodatnim tehničnim izboljšavam, povezanim z varnostjo).
Therefore, in order to use a comparable basis as far as possible, we compared the market rent reported for contract signature period with the rent for office space stipulated in the contract. 
Zato je Sodišče, da bi v karseda veliki meri uporabljalo primerljivo podlago, tržno najemnino, sporočeno za obdobje podpisa pogodbe, primerjalo z najemnino za pisarniški prostor, določeno v pogodbi.
It should be noted that most of the rental contracts signed by the institutions include provision for indexation, which is normal market practice. 
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da večina najemnih pogodb, ki so jih podpisale institucije, vključuje provizijo za indeksacijo, kar je običajna tržna praksa.
11 For rented buildings, the institutions use different legal arrangements: — standard rental; — usufruct7; — long-term leasehold (“emphyteusis”8) without the option to buy. 
11 Institucije za najete zgradbe uporabljajo različne pravne ureditve: — običajni najem; — užitek7; — dolgoročni zakup (emfitevza8) brez možnosti odkupa.
12 The party using a building in accordance with a usufruct or emphyteusis contract is required to pay the taxes, such as registration tax, VAT, property tax and other regional taxes linked to the property. By contrast, under a lease contract, the lessor (owner) is required to pay those taxes and pass on the costs incurred to the lessee. 
12 Stran, ki zgradbo uporablja v skladu s pogodbo o užitku ali emfitevzi, mora plačati davke, kot so davek ob registraciji, DDV, nepremičninski davek in drugi regionalni Vir: Poročilo nepremičninske agencije JLL o pisarniškem trgu v Luxembourgu za zadnje četrtletje leta 2015 Najemnina za pisarniški prostor, določena v pogodbi.
Usufruct - Right to use a building. 
Užitek je pravica do uporabe zgradbe.
The user (usufructuary) has more rights than under a rental contract but also more obligations when it comes to repair works. 
Uporabnik (užitkar) ima več pravic kot bi jih imel na podlagi najemne pogodbe, in obenem več obveznosti, kar zadeva popravila.
Most taxes are the responsibility of the user, not the owner. 
Za večino davkov je odgovoren uporabnik in ne lastnik.
The usufruct payment (redevance) is generally lower than the cost of leasing the same building. 
Plačilo za užitek (pristojbina) je običajno nižje kot stroški zakupa iste zgradbe.
Emphyteusis - The right to use land or a building in exchange for rent, for a fixed amount of time (under Belgian law, minimum 27 and maximum 99 years). 
Emfitevza je pravica do uporabe zemljišča ali zgradbe v zameno za najemnino v omejenem obdobju (po belgijski zakonodaji najmanj 27 in največ 99 let).