natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
VII (j) The Commission disagrees. 
VII (j) Komisija se s tem ne strinja.
The Commission con‐ siders that the sustainability period as defined by the Court should correspond to the durability period of the operations as defined in Article 71 of the common provisions regulation (CPR — Regula‐ tion (EU) No 1303/2013). 
Meni, da bi moralo obdobje trajnosti, kot ga opredeljuje Sodišče, ustre‐ zati obdobju trajnosti operacij, kot je opredeljeno v členu 71 uredbe o skupnih določbah.
There is no legal basis for the Commission to impose an adjustment of the durability period to the actual life of the business incubator assets beyond the 5 years. 
Ni pravne podlage, v skladu s katero bi lahko Komisija prila‐ godila obdobje trajnosti dejanskemu življenjskemu ciklu sredstev podjetniškega inkubatorja za več kot pet let.
In that context, the Commission takes note of the good practices identified by the Court in some Member States. 
Komisija v zvezi z navedenim upošteva dobre pra‐ kse, ki jih je Sodišče ugotovilo v nekaterih državah članicah.
VII (k) The Commission recognises the need to continue updating the knowledge. 
VII (k) Komisija priznava, da je treba informacije še naprej posodabljati.
In 2014, the Commission will publish a report on ‘Setting up, managing and evaluating EU science and technology parks’ which will provide advice and guidance and will be dis‐ seminated to managing authorities. 
Komisija bo leta 2014 objavila poročilo z naslovom „Ustanavljanje, upravljanje in ocenje‐ vanje znanstvenih in tehnoloških parkov EU“, ki bo vsebovalo nasvete in smernice ter bo posredovano organom upravljanja.
Reply of the Commission 39 VII (l) The Commission agrees and underlines that the new orientation of the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN) (2015–21) already takes account of these recommendations. 
Odgovori Komisije 39 VII (l) Komisija se strinja in poudarja, da nova usmerjenost Evropske podjetniške mreže (2015–2021) že upo‐ števa ta priporočila.
The EEN will play a role in con‐ necting regional SME support services (including incubators) to good practice at European level. 
Evropska podjetniška mreža bo imela vlogo pri povezovanju regionalnih podpornih storitev za MSP (vključno z inkubatorji) in dobre prakse na evropski ravni.
Enterprise Europe Network partners in the current network are also required to cooperate with other European networks and to put in place actions such as joint promotion and signposting. 
Poleg tega morajo sedanji partnerji Evropske pod‐ jetniške mreže sodelovati z drugimi evropskimi mre‐ žami ter izvajati ukrepe, kot sta skupna promocija in zagotavljanje informacij.
Introduction 01 The Commission reflected the important role which the SMEs play in the economy in the regulatory framework for the new 2014–20 programming period: the SMEs should be primarily supported from the European Structural and Investment Funds. 
Uvod 01 Komisija je pomembno vlogo MSP v gospodarstvu opisala v regulativnem okviru za novo programsko obdobje 2014–2020, v skladu s katerim bi bilo treba MSP podpirati predvsem iz evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov (skladi ESI).
Audit scope and objectives 16 The Commission welcomes the Court’s recognition that the EBN’s certification scheme, supported by the Commission, fosters best practice. 
Obseg in cilji revizije 16 Komisija pozdravlja priznanje Sodišča, da sistem potrjevanja EBN, ki ga Komisija podpira, spodbuja dobro prakso.
ERDF co‐ funded incubators in the Court’s sample are com‐ pared with EC‐BIC incubators which are certified on the basis of a wide range of criteria. 
Inkubatorji iz vzorca Sodišča, sofinan‐ cirani iz ESRR, se primerjajo z inkubatorji EC‐BIC, ki so potrjeni na podlagi veliko različnih meril.
Observations Common reply for paragraphs 21 to 23 The Commission welcomes the Court’s assessment. 
Opažanja Skupni odgovor na odstavke od 21 do 23 Komisija pozdravlja oceno Sodišča.
26 The size of the incubators is one of many factors ensuring comparability between the effectiveness of the ERDF audited incubators in relation to the benchmarked population. 
26 Velikost inkubatorjev je eden od številnih dejavni‐ kov, ki zagotavljajo primerjavo učinkovitosti med revidiranimi inkubatorji, sofinanciranimi iz ESRR, in referenčnimi inkubatorji.
The Commission would like to highlight that other external factors are also important, such as a regional economy, a profile of incubators and the type of businesses accommo‐ dated, and the principles of market failures. 
Komisija poudarja, da so pomembni tudi drugi zunanji dejavniki, kot so regionalno gospodarstvo, profil inkubatorjev, vrsta gostujočih podjetij in načela nedelovanja trga.
The primary role of the ERDF incubators is to foster the development of start‐ups. 
Glavna vloga inkubatorjev, sofinanciranih iz ESRR, je spodbujati razvoj zagonskih podjetij.
Support offered to businesses beyond the scope of physical incubation can be achieved by other means. 
Podporo, zagotovljeno podjetjem zunaj obsega fizične inku‐ bacije, je mogoče doseči tudi na drugačne načine.
As an example, business support in the UK is often provided by service companies which offer a wide variety of business advice. 
Podporo podjetjem v Združenem kraljestvu na pri‐ mer zagotavljajo storitvena podjetja, ki nudijo širok obseg storitev poslovnega svetovanja.
27 As regards the example given by the Court, the Commission notes that the cost per job created to assess the incubator’s efficiency can vary from country to country as the start‐up costs, deprecia‐ tion and accounting policies as well as salary level in different Member States impact upon this indicator. 
27 Kar zadeva primer, ki ga navaja Sodišče, Komisija ugotavlja, da se lahko stroški na ustvarjeno delovno mesto za oceno učinkovitosti inkubatorja razlikujejo od države do države, saj je ta kazalnik odvisen od stroškov ustanovitve, amortizacije, računovodskih politik in stopnje plač v različnih državah članicah.
28 The relative underperformance of ERDF‐supported incubators in the Court’s sample can also be ascribed to the fact that BIC incubators are subject to the quality check of EC‐BIC’s certification scheme. 
28 Sorazmerno slabo smotrnost poslovanja inkubator‐ jev, podprtih iz ESRR, v vzorcu Sodišča je mogoče pripisati tudi dejstvu, da se za inkubatorje BIC upo‐ rablja preverjanje kakovosti v okviru sistema potrje‐ vanja EC‐BIC.
See also the reply to paragraph 16. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 16.
29 Internal performance depends on management skills, organisation and the motivational and local innovation systems. 
29 Notranja uspešnost je odvisna od veščin upravljanja, organizacije, sistema spodbud in lokalnega inovacij‐ skega sistema.
The Commission will recom‐ mend that Member States implement accreditation or quality systems in ERDF‐inanced incubators. 
Komisija bo državam članicam pripo‐ ročila, da izvajajo akreditacijske sisteme ali sisteme kakovosti v inkubatorjih, financiranih iz ESRR.
Reply of the Commission 40 32 The Commission welcomes the Court’s assessment that 22 out of 27 projects audited had prepared a business plan in line with the obligations arising from the legislation governing ERDF support. 
Odgovori Komisije 40 32 Komisija pozdravlja oceno Sodišča, da je bil v okviru 22 od 27 revidiranih projektov pripravljen poslovni načrt v skladu z obveznostmi iz zakono‐ daje, ki ureja podporo iz ESRR.
The Commission acknowledges that in some cases business plans, although in line with the formal selection criterion, lacked quantifiable objectives and appropriate results indicators. 
Komisija priznava, da so v poslovnih načrtih, ki so bili sicer v skladu s formalnim merilom za izbor, v nekaterih primerih manjkali količinsko opredeljivi cilji in ustrezni kazalniki rezultatov.
However, under shared management, the selection of projects is the responsibility of the Member States. 
Vendar so pri deljenem upravljanju za izbor projektov odgovorne države članice.
This means that when selecting the business incubators, it should have been primarily the Member State (the managing authority) verifying the quality of project application and supporting documents (e.g. quality of business plans). 
To pomeni, da bi pri izboru podje‐ tniških inkubatorjev morala biti predvsem država članica (organ upravljanja) tista, ki preveri kakovost projektne vloge in dokazil (npr. kakovost poslovnih načrtov).
33 As recalled in the reply to paragraph 32, the selec‐ tion of projects under shared management is the responsibility of the Member States. 
33 Kot je navedeno v odgovoru na odstavek 32, so pri deljenem upravljanju za izbor projektov odgovorne države članice.
It is neither the role of the Commission nor within its capacity to verify all these details for each project application. 
Preverjanje vseh teh podrobnosti za vsako projektno vlogo ni vloga Komisije niti ni Komisija za to pristojna.
34 In some Member States, especially Member States that joined the EU in and after 2004, a predominant focus was given to the construction of the physical infrastructure because of a lack of previous experi‐ ence in the implementation of business incubators. 
34 V nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti tistih, ki so pristopile k EU leta 2004 in pozneje, je bil zaradi pomanjkanja predhodnih izkušenj z izvajanjem podjetniških inkubatorjev poudarek predvsem na gradnji fizične infrastrukture.
In order to have a fully operational business incu‐ bator, time and well‐performing local innovation ecosystems are required. 
Za popolno delova‐ nje podjetniškega inkubatorja sta potrebna čas in dobro delujoč lokalni inovacijski ekosistem.
This is the process which is going to be enforced with the new result‐orientation approach of cohesion policy. 
To je proces, ki se bo izvajal v okviru novega pristopa kohezijske politike, ki je usmerjen v rezultate.
36 As explained in paragraph 34, the business infrastruc‐ ture (e.g. business incubators) is underdeveloped in the majority of Member States that joined the EU in and after 2004. 
36 Kot je pojasnjeno v odstavku 34, je poslovna infra‐ struktura (npr. podjetniški inkubatorji) preslabo razvita v večini držav članic, ki so pristopile k EU leta 2004 in pozneje.
The ERDF supported the construction of business incubators and provision of basic ‘soft services’ for the newly in the 2007–13 period. 
ESRR je v obdobju 2007–2013 prvič podpiral gradnjo podjetniških inkubatorjev in zagotavljanje osnovnih „mehkih storitev“.
Soon it became evident that the support of ‘soft services’ was underestimated and improvements are planned for the 2014–20 programming period. 
Kmalu je postalo jasno, da je podpora „mehkih storitev“ podcenjena, pri čemer se za programsko obdo‐ bje 2014–2020 načrtujejo izboljšave.
37 Incubators go through different stages of the life cycle and their provisions depend on their maturity and the ecosystem they are operating in. 
37 Inkubatorji imajo različne faze življenjskega cikla, njihova ponudba pa je odvisna od njihove zrelosti in ekosistema, v katerem delujejo.
Although the Commission shares the view that a broad range of services should be offered to enable smooth incubation, the services to be offered are developing over time in line with the life cycle of incubators. 
Komisija se sicer strinja, da bi bilo treba zagotoviti širok razpon stori‐ tev, da se omogoči nemotena inkubacija, vendar se storitve, ki bi jih bilo treba zagotoviti, razvijajo skozi čas v skladu z življenjskim ciklom inkubatorjev.
38 The ERDF supported the construction of business incubators but there was a lack of focus on the coop‐ eration among businesses and business incubators. 
38 ESRR je sicer podpiral gradnjo podjetniških inku‐ batorjev, vendar se je premalo pozornosti name‐ njalo sodelovanju med podjetji in podjetniškimi inkubatorji.
In Member States that joined EU in 2004 and after, it is caused by lack of business knowledge (business planning, management skills etc.) on both sides, on the side of business incubators (new infrastructure and no skilled labour to manage it) and on the side of enterprises. 
V državah članicah, ki so pristopile k EU leta 2004 in pozneje, je to bila posledica pomanj‐ kanja poslovnega znanja (poslovnega načrtovanja, veščin upravljanja itd.) pri obeh straneh, tj. pri pod‐ jetniških inkubatorjih (nova infrastruktura, vendar brez usposobljene delovne sile, ki bi jo upravljala) in podjetjih.
The same is valid for EU‐15 Member States where the investments aimed to complement the mission innovation system infrastructure. 
Enako velja za države članice EU‐15, v katerih so bile naložbe namenjene kot dopolnitev k ustvarjanju infrastrukture inovacijskega sistema.
Furthermore, hosted companies are not compelled to collaborate with the incubator’s staff as they might resort to external services in order to estab‐ lish their development plan. 
Poleg tega gostujoča podjetja niso obvezana sode‐ lovati z osebjem inkubatorja, saj se lahko za obliko‐ vanje razvojnega načrta obrnejo na zunanje službe.
Sharing sensitive data might have negative consequences for the hosted companies unless a confidentiality agreement is signed. 
Če ni podpisanega dogovora o zaupnosti, ima lahko izmenjava občutljivih podatkov za gostujočo podje‐ tje negativne posledice.
Business services can be commissioned from out‐ side service providers instead of entrusting them to the incubator staff. 
Za poslovne storitve je namesto osebja inkuba‐ torja mogoče pooblastiti tudi zunanje ponudnike storitev.
39 The Commission refers to its reply to paragraph 38. 
39 Komisija se sklicuje na svoj odgovor na odstavek 38.
40 As pointed out by the Court, clients are attracted by subsidised office space rather than by services provided. 
40 Kot je izpostavilo Sodišče, uporabnike bolj kot storitve, ki se zagotavljajo, pritegne subvencioniran pisarniški prostor.
Tenants should be carefully selected and reflect a profile set out in the incubation programme. 
Najemnike bi bilo treba skrbno izbrati v skladu s profilom iz programa inkubiranja.
As the selection of projects and the definition of selection criteria fall within national competences, the Commission will recommend that Member States consider these aspects. 
Ker sta izbor projektov in opredelitev meril za izbor v nacionalni pristojnosti, bo Komisija državam člani‐ cam priporočila, da upoštevajo te vidike.
Reply of the Commission 41 41 Specialist services can be offered by outsiders as in‐ house services are of a more general nature. 
41 Posebne storitve lahko nudijo zunanji ponudniki, saj so notranje storitve bolj splošne narave.
Build‐ ing the expertise of incubator staff can be costly and the incubator might never reap the desired benefits. 
Razvoj stro‐ kovnega znanja osebja inkubatorja je lahko drag, inkubator pa morda nikoli ne bo imel želenih koristi.
43 The Commission considers that the lack of cooper‐ ation between incubators and clients may be a direct consequence of the client’s reluctance to share sensitive data. 
43 Komisija meni, da je pomanjkanje sodelovanja med inkubatorji in uporabniki morda neposredna posle‐ dica dejstva, da uporabniki ne želijo izmenjevati občutljivih podatkov.
44 The Commission considers that disbursed EU funds have a positive impact on the development of entities which are not physically located in the incu‐ bator’s premises but use their services and cooper‐ ate with tenants. 
44 Komisija meni, da črpana sredstva EU pozitivno vplivajo na razvoj subjektov, ki niso fizično prisotni v prostorih inkubatorja, vendar uporabljajo njegove storitve in sodelujejo z najemniki.
45 The business incubators have been only set up in Member States which joined in and after 2004 in this programming period and time was then needed to develop further the cooperation between the incubator and its clients and also with prospective clients. 
45 Podjetniški inkubatorji so bili ustanovljeni le v državah članicah, ki so pristopile leta 2004 in pozneje v tem programskem obdobju, pri čemer je bil potreben čas za nadaljnji razvoj sodelovanja med inkubatorjem in njegovimi uporabniki ter tudi s potencialnimi uporabniki.
Another factor which limited the cooperation was the quality of the staff manag‐ ing the business incubators that often possessed insufficient business skills. 
Drug dejavnik, ki je oviral sodelovanje, je bila kakovost osebja, ki je upravljalo podjetniške inkubatorje, saj člani ose‐ bja pogosto niso imeli ustreznih poslovnih veščin.
Lastly, some incubators lacked the organisational capacity to provide pre‐ incubation support while providing such support usually requires additional own resources. 
Poleg tega nekateri inkubatorji niso imeli zadostne organizacijske zmogljivosti, da bi zagotavljali pod‐ poro v predinkubacijski fazi, saj so za to običajno potrebni dodatni lastni viri.
The same is valid for EU‐15 Member States where the investments aimed to complement the creation of an innovation system infrastructure. 
Enako velja za države članice EU‐15, v katerih so bile naložbe namenjene kot dopolnitev k ustvarjanju infrastrukture inovacijskega sistema.
47 Weak cooperation between the business sector, universities and R & D institutions is well known in the Member States which joined the EU in 2004 and after and the Commission has been attempting to solve this issue in the current programming period by establishing proper coordination mechanisms where possible. 
47 V državah članicah, ki so pristopile k EU leta 2004 in pozneje, je slabo sodelovanje med poslovnim sektorjem, univerzami ter ustanovami za raziskave in razvoj znano dejstvo, pri čemer je Komisija v sedanjem programskem obdobju poskušala rešiti to težavo z vzpostavljanjem ustreznih mehanizmov za usklajevanje, kadar je bilo to mogoče.
This issue then has an impact on the activities of business incubators and their attempts to network with R & D and university partners. 
Ta težava posledično vpliva na dejavnosti podjetniških inku‐ batorjev ter njihove poskuse mrežnega povezovanja s partnerskimi ustanovami za raziskave in razvoj ter univerzami.
Reply of the Commission 42 58 The incubator’s provisions can be viewed from two perspectives: services provided and premises. 
Odgovori Komisije 42 58 Ponudbo inkubatorja je mogoče obravnavati z dveh vidikov, in sicer z vidika storitev, ki se zagotavljajo, in prostorov.
As far as premises are concerned, the ERDF has achieved the objective of providing suitable office space. 
Kar zadeva slednje, je ESRR dosegel cilje v zvezi z zagotavljanjem primernih pisarniških prostorov.
The service function can be delivered by outside service providers. 
Storitve lahko zagotavljajo zunanji ponu‐ dniki storitev.
Lack of external funding is a frequent issue when supporting SMEs or R & D activities. 
Pomanjkanje zunanjega financiranja pri podpiranju MSP ali dejavnosti na področju raziskav in razvoja je pogosta težava.
The business incubators were built in regions and after the sustainability period as defined in the ERDF regula‐ tion they were allowed to switch to other activities. 
Podjetniški inkubatorji so bili zgra‐ jeni v regijah, po obdobju trajnosti, kot je oprede‐ ljeno v uredbi o ESRR, pa jim je bil dovoljen prehod na druge dejavnosti.
This was primarily caused by improper definition of selection criteria; therefore, in the new program‐ ming period, and in line with the subsidiarity prin‐ ciple, the Commission will recommend that manag‐ ing authorities pay more attention to this aspect in particular, by establishing more demanding selec‐ tion criteria in the operation selection process. 
To je bila predvsem posle‐ dica nepravilne opredelitve meril za izbor, zaradi česar bo Komisija v novem programskem obdobju v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti organom upra‐ vljanja priporočila, da namenijo več pozornosti zla‐ sti temu vidiku, in sicer tako, da v postopku izbora projektov določijo zahtevnejša merila za izbor.
59 Under the shared management, the Commission is not involved in the selection of projects, except for the approval of the major projects. 
59 Pri deljenem upravljanju Komisija ni vključena v izbor projektov, razen za odobritev velikih projektov.
Indeed, as laid down in Article 125 of the CPR, establishing selection criteria falls under the responsibility of the managing authority, with the approval of the monitoring committee. 
1303/2013 z dne 17. decembra 2013) je za določanje meril za izbor dejansko odgovoren organ upravljanja, vendar mora merila potrditi odbor za spremljanje.
According to Article 48(3) of the CPR, the Commis‐ sion shall participate in the work of the monitoring committee but only in an advisory capacity. 
V skladu s členom 48(3) uredbe o skupnih določbah Komisija svetuje odboru za spremljanje.
The European Commission will therefore advise the managing authorities to include recommendations of the European Court of Auditors in the selection process and selection criteria of business incuba‐ tors. 
Zato bo Evropska komisija organom upravljanja svetovala, da v postopek izbora in merila za izbor podjetniških inkubatorjev vključijo priporočila Evropskega računskega sodišča.
Also, a contribution to the expected results of the priority axis is now required to be included in the selection criteria. 
Poleg tega je treba v merila za izbor zdaj vključiti tudi prispevek k priča‐ kovanim rezultatom prednostne osi.
60 For the 2014–20 programming period, the Commis‐ sion is requesting Member States to fulfil ex ante conditionality to put in place a smart specialisa‐ tion strategy which shall be developed through an entrepreneurial discovery process with a very closed involvement of enterprises to meet research strengths with business needs. 
60 Komisija za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 od držav članic zahteva, da izpolnijo predhodno pogo‐ jenost v zvezi z uvedbo strategije pametne spe‐ cializacije, razvite v okviru podjetniškega procesa iskanja in ob zelo tesnem sodelovanju s podjetji, da se uskladijo prednosti na področju raziskav s poslovnimi potrebami.
Common reply to paragraphs 62 to 62(c) Under the 2007–13 legal framework, the project assessment and selection process falls under the responsibility of national authorities, the manag‐ ing authority and the monitoring committee, with the Commission having only an advisory role in the latter. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavek 62 in odstavek 62 (c) V skladu s pravnim okvirom za obdobje 2007–2013 so za postopek ocene in izbora projektov odgo‐ vorni nacionalni organi, organ upravljanja in odbor za spremljanje, pri čemer Komisija slednjemu le svetuje.
Under the 2014–20 legal framework, the contribu‐ tion of an operation to the expected results of a priority axis is now required to be included in the selection criteria. 
V skladu s pravnim okvirom za obdobje 2014–2020 je treba v merila za izbor zdaj vključiti tudi prispe‐ vek dejavnosti k pričakovanim rezultatom predno‐ stne osi.
62(d) Investments in business incubators are more of an enabler than a driver of growth. 
62 (d) Naložbe v podjetniške inkubatorje bolj omogočajo rast, kot jo spodbujajo.
Business incubators cannot generate economic growth by themselves; they need to be combined with other external factors. 
Podjetniški inkubatorji sami ne morejo ustvarjati gospodarske rasti, zato jih je treba kombinirati z drugimi zunanjimi dejavniki.
In addition, the interventions may have significant externalities, having both negative and positive influences on the development of a region. 
Poleg tega imajo lahko ukrepi znatne zunanje učinke, ki tako negativno kot tudi pozitivno vplivajo na razvoj regije.
Therefore, establishing a direct link between the investment in a business incubator and regional benefits requires in‐depth evaluation. 
Zato je za vzpostavitev neposredne povezave med naložbo v podjetniški inkubator in regionalnimi koristmi potrebna podrobna ocena.
The Commission assesses the stated objectives of the priority axes of operational programmes. 
Komisija oceni navedene cilje prednostnih osi operativnih programov.
This may not only be jobs created but also, for example, new products developed or exports generated. 
Ti cilji ne zajemajo nujno le ustvarjanja delovnih mest, ampak na primer tudi razvoj novih izdelkov in izvoz.
64 As regards Member States which joined in and after 2004, they are still (continuously) learning how to properly define indicators and evaluate their implementation. 
64 Države članice, ki so pristopile leta 2004 in pozneje, se še vedno (nenehno) učijo, kako pravilno opre‐ deliti kazalnike in oceniti izvajanje.