natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court recommends that the Commission considers the merits of alternative approaches to simplify and reduce the costs of the scheme and improve the effectiveness of the aid. 
Sodišče priporoča, da Komisija razmisli o prednostih drugačnih pristopov, da bi poenostavila program pomoči, zmanjšala njegove stroške ter izboljšala uspešnost pomoči.
The Commission should consider if this could best be achieved by aligning the schemeŐs procedures and rules for the eligibility of expenditure with those of the Rural Development investment measures. 
Komisija bi morala razmisliti, ali bi bilo to mogoče najbolje doseči z uskladitvijo postopkov in pravil o upravičenosti odhodkov, ki veljajo za ta program, s tistimi, ki veljajo za naložbene ukrepe za razvoj podeželja.
Whichever approach is followed, the Commission should improve its monitoring of the effectiveness of the aid and use the planned evaluation study in 2009 to establish the reasons for the relative lack of progress by producer organisations, particularly in those Member States where the fruit and vegetables sector represents the highest proportion of agricultural output. 
Ne glede na to, kateremu pristopu bo sledila, bi Komisija morala izboljšati svoje spremljanje uspešnosti pomoči in leta 2009 uporabiti načrtovano ocenjevalno študijo, da ugotovi razloge za relativno pomanjkanje napredka organizacij proizvajalcev, zlasti v tistih državah članicah, kjer sektor sadja in zelenjave predstavlja največji delež kmetijske proizvodnje.
X. If the evaluation confirms that producer organisations are an effective mechanism for strengthening the position of growers in these Member States, the policy should be better targeted to achieve this. 
X. Če ocena potrdi, da so organizacije proizvajalcev uspešen mehanizem za okrepitev položaja pridelovalcev v teh državah članicah, bi bilo treba za doseganje tega cilja politiko bolje usmeriti.
If, on the other hand, the Commission cannot demonstrate that the concentration of supply in producer organisations delivers real benefits, it should reconsider this mechanism for supporting the EUŐs fruit and vegetable growers. 
Če Komisija po drugi strani ne more pokazati, da koncentracija ponudbe v organizacijah proizvajalcev prinaša dejanske koristi, bi morala ponovno razmisliti o tem mehanizmu za podpiranje pridelovalcev sadja in zelenjave v EU.
C 282/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 INTRODUCTION Objective of the aid scheme: adapting to the changing market situation 1. 
C 282/34 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 20.11.2006 UVOD Cilj programa pomoči: prilagajanje spreminjajočim se razmeram na trgu 1.
Faced in the 1990s with a changing market for fruit and vegetables, requiring different products and increased guarantees of quality and environmental standards, the EU introduced a new aid scheme to support growers in adapting to this demand. 
EU je bila v 1990-ih soočena s spreminjajočim se trgom sadja in zelenjave, ki je zahteval drugačne proizvode in večja jamstva glede kakovosti in okoljskih standardov, zato je uvedla nov program pomoči, da bi pridelovalce podprla pri prilagajanju na takšno povpraševanje.
This was the aid for Ôoperational programmesŐ, which is described below. 
To je bila pomoč za „operativne progra-me“, ki je opisana v nadaljevanju.
At the same time, cuts were made in the long-standing aid for withdrawals (1), providing a further incentive for the EUŐs growers to produce what the market wanted. 2. 
Hkrati je bila omejena že dolgo izvajana pomoč za umike (1), kar je pridelovalce v EU še dodatno spodbudilo h gojenju tega, kar je želel trg. 2.
The market situation was also changing with the increasing dominance of a few large retail and distribution groups. 
Razmere na trgu so se prav tako spreminjale, saj je naraščala prevlada nekaj velikih skupin za maloprodajo in distribucijo.
In response, the EU strengthened the policy followed since the 1960s encouraging the formation of groups of growers known as Ôproducer organisationsŐ with a view to obtaining economies of scale and a stronger market presence. 
V odziv je EU okrepila politiko, ki jo je izvajala že od 1960-ih let, v okviru katere je spodbujala oblikovanje skupin pridelovalcev, znanih kot „organizacije proizvajalcev“, da bi dosegla ekonomijo obsega in močnejšo prisotnost na trgu.
This grouping of supply (or ÔconcentrationŐ) was encouraged by making membership of a producer organisation a condition for receiving the new aid for operational programmes. 
To združevanje ponudbe (ali „koncentracijo“) je spodbujala tako, da je bilo članstvo v organizaciji proizvajalcev pogoj za prejemanje nove pomoči za operativne programe.
Fruit and vegetable growers not in producer organisations were not eligible for the EU aid. 
Pridelovalci sadja in zelenjave, ki niso bili člani organizacije proizvajalcev, niso bili upravičeni do pomoči EU.
This created an incentive for growers to form or join producer organisations. 
To je spodbudilo pridelovalce, da oblikujejo organizacije proizvajalcev ali pa se jim pridružijo.
At the same time, the EU set stricter conditions to be met by the producer organisations to ensure that they would be effective in concentrating the supply. 
Hkrati je EU določila strožje pogoje za organizacije proizvajalcev, da bi zagotovila njihovo uspešnost pri koncentriranju ponudbe.
Audit scope and approach 4. 
Obseg in pristop revizije 4.
The Court reported the results of its previous audit of the aids for the fruit and vegetable sector in the Annual Report for 2000 (2). 
Sodišče je poročalo o rezultatih svoje prejšnje revizije pomoči za sektor sadja in zelenjave v Letnem poročilu za leto 2000 (2).
At that time, few operational programmes had been completed, so the longer-term effectiveness of the aid was not apparent. 
Takrat je bilo dokončanih le malo operativnih programov, zato dolgoročna uspešnost pomoči ni bila očitna.
However, the report identified weaknesses in the Member StatesŐ management of the scheme, which had reduced the effectiveness of the aid. 
Vendar so bile v poročilu opredeljene pomanjkljivosti v upravljanju programa pomoči s strani držav članic, zaradi katerih je bila pomoč manj uspešna.
In the light of this, the objective set for this audit was to assess the effectiveness of the aid scheme for operational programmes. 
Glede na to je bil cilj te revizije oceniti uspešnost programa pomoči za operativne programe.
Effectiveness is defined in the EUŐs Financial Regulation (3) as Ôattaining the specific objectives set and achieving the intended resultsŐ. 
Uspešnost je v Finančni uredbi EU (3) opredeljena kot „doseganje specifičnih ciljev in rezultatov, za katere so bila sredstva namenjena“.
As the objectives set for the operational programme aid scheme are not definite or quantified, in this audit, effectiveness is considered as making progress towards those objectives. 
Ker cilji, določeni za program pomoči za operativne programe, niso dokončni ali količinsko opredeljeni, se uspešnost pri tej reviziji razume kot doseganje napredka pri izpolnjevanju teh ciljev.
6. (i) (ii) (iii) 7. (i) (ii) (iii) The questions set for this audit were: Has the aid scheme been implemented in a way to ensure that operational programmes are likely to be effective? 
6. (i) (ii) (iii) 7. (i) (ii) (iii) Pri tej reviziji so bila zastavljena naslednja vprašanja: Ali je bil program pomoči izvajan tako, da se zagotovi verjetnost uspešnosti operativnih programov?
Have the measures financed in operational programmes been effective? 
Ali so bili ukrepi, financirani v operativnih programih, uspešni?
Haveproducerorganisationsmadeprogresstowardsachiev-ing the objectives set for the aid scheme? The audit approach consisted of: assessing the procedures established by the Commission and the Member States for implementing the policy; testing the effectiveness of a sample of operational programme actions; and examiningasampleofproducerorganisations,andCommis-sion data at EU level, for evidence of progress made by producer organisations towards the policy objectives. 
Revizijski pristop je zajemal: ocenjevanje postopkov, ki so jih Komisija in države članice vzpostavile za izvajanje politike; preizkušanje uspešnosti na vzorcu dejavnosti operativnih programov; in pregledvzorcaorganizacijproizvajalcevterpodatkovKomi-sije na ravni EU, da bi dobili dokaze o napredku, ki so ga organizacije proizvajalcev dosegle pri ciljih politike.
Text box 1 ÔAn intelligent aidŐ enthused the director of a fruit and vegetable producer organisation we visited. 
Okvir 1 „Inteligentna pomoč,“ je bil navdušen direktor ene od obiskanih organizacij proizvajalcev sadja in zelenjave.
No longer does the EU hand out aid to growers to destroy their surplus fruit and vegetables that no one wants to buy. 
EU pridelovalcem ne daje več pomoči za uničevanje njihovega presežnega sadja in zelenjave, ki ju nihče noče kupiti.
Now, the EU subsidises measures taken by the growers to adapt their production to the quantity and quality for which there is demand. 
Zdaj EU subvencionira ukrepe, ki jih pridelovalci sprejmejo, da bi prilagodili svojo proizvodnjo količini in kakovosti, po katerih vlada povpraševanje.
Text box 2 ÔGrowing successŐ: The aid is linked to turnover, so the more producer organisations grow, the more aid they get to finance adaptation. 
Okvir 2 „Uspešna rast“: Pomoč je vezana na promet, zato bolj kot organizacije proizvajalcev rastejo, več pomoči prejmejo za financiranje prilagajanja.
This success should encourage more growers to form or join producer organisations, resulting in more bargaining power and a higher turnover, and therefore more aid for further adaptation... 
Ta uspeh bi moral več pridelovalcev spodbuditi, da oblikujejo organizacije proizvajalcev ali pa se jim pridružijo, kar bi prineslo več pogajalske moči in višji promet, s tem pa tudi več pomoči za nadaljnje prilagajanje ...
8. random sample of 30 operational programmes completed in 2003 and 2004 in eight Member States: Greece, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. 
8. naključnem vzorcu 30 operativnih programov, ki so bili v letih 2003 in 2004 dokončani v osmih državah članicah: Grčiji, Španiji, Franciji, na Irskem, v Italiji, na Nizozemskem, Portugalskem in v Združenem kraljestvu.
Producer organisations in the new Member States were not included as they had not completed operational programmes at the time of the audit. 
Organizacije proizvajalcev v novih državah članicah niso bile zajete, saj v času revizije še niso dokončale operativnih programov.
(2) Court of Auditors Ń Annual Report concerning the financial year 2000 (OJ C 359, 15.12.2001). 
(2) Računsko sodišče – Letno poročilo za proračunsko leto 2000 (UL C 359, 15.12.2001).
(3) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 
(3) Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 (UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
The audit fieldwork was undertaken in 2005, based on a (1) Growers who ÔwithdrawŐ surplus fruit and vegetables from the market to support prices (usually by destroying the produce) are paid compensation from the EU budget. 
Revizijsko delo na terenu je bilo opravljeno v letu 2005 na (1) Pridelovalci, ki „umaknejo“ presežek sadja in zelenjave s trga v podporo cenam (običajno tako, da uničijo pridelke), prejmejo nadomestilo iz proračuna EU.
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/35 Producer organisations 9. 
20.11.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 282/35 Organizacije proizvajalcev 9.
A producer organisation is a group of growers who act together to strengthen their position in the market. 
Organizacija proizvajalcev je skupina pridelovalcev, ki delujejo skupaj, da bi okrepili svoj položaj na trgu.
Many are cooperatives, but they can be groups of individuals or groups of companies. 
Številne so zadruge, lahko pa so tudi skupine posameznikov ali skupine družb.
The conditions to be met, set out in the EU regulations (1), are to have at least five members and a minimum turnover of 100 000 euro. 
Pogoji zanje so določeni v uredbah EU (1), in sicer morajo imeti vsaj pet članov in minimalni promet v višini 100 000 EUR.
Producer organisations have to provide the means for storing, packaging and marketing their membersŐ produce. 
Organizacije proizvajalcev morajo zagotavljati sredstva za skladiščenje, pakiranje in trženje proizvodnje svojih članov.
They have to be able to plan and adapt their production, and promote environmentally sound cultivation and waste-management practices. 
To proizvodnjo morajo biti sposobne načrtovati in prilagajati ter spodbujati okolju prijazno obdelavo tal in ravnanje z odpadki.
A start-up aid is available over a five-year period for new producer organisations to set up and acquire the facilities they need to meet the EUŐs conditions. 
Novi organizaciji proizvajalcev je v petletnem obdobju na voljo zagonska pomoč za vzpostavitev in pridobitev zmogljivosti, potrebnih za izpolnjevanje pogojev EU.
Once established, Member States check that producer organisations continue to meet these conditions, although no further aid is available for this. 
Ko je organizacija vzpostavljena, države članice preverjajo, da še naprej izpolnjuje te zahteve, vendar za to ni več na voljo nobena dodatna pomoč.
In principle, the EU does not support producer organisationsŐ administrative, operating or production costs (2). 
Načeloma EU ne podpira upravnih, poslovnih in proizvodnih stroškov organizacij proizvajalcev (2).
There are some 1 500 producer organisations in the 14 Member States (3) (Diagram 1). 
V 14 državah članicah (3) je približno 1 500 organizacij proizvajalcev (Diagram 1).
There is a great diversity in the sizes and nature of producer organisations (Diagram 2). 
Te organizacije se med seboj močno razlikujejo po velikosti in vrsti (Diagram 2).
In the course of this audit, the Court visited fig growers in Greece and mushroom growers in Ireland, a citrus fruit cooperative in Portugal and tomato growers from Spain to the Netherlands. 
Sodišče je med revizijo obiskalo gojitelje fig v Grčiji, gojitelje gob na Irskem, zadrugo za pridelavo agrumov na Portugalskem in gojitelje paradižnika od Španije do Nizozemske.
Some had fewer than 10 members, one in Italy specialising in apples had 5 800 members. 
Nekatere organizacije so imele manj kot deset članov, ena od organizacij v Italiji, specializirana za jabolka, pa 5 800 članov.
One producer organisation was made up of 14 companies, each with turnover averaging 2,6 million euro, another was a cooperative of 800 part-time growers averaging just 600 euro of produce each. 
Eno organizacijo proizvajalcev je sestavljalo 14 družb, vsaka s povprečnim prometom v višini 2,6 milijona EUR, druga pa je bila zadruga z 800 pridelovalci s krajšim delovnim časom, ki so imeli v povprečju vsak za 600 EUR proizvodnje.
The average EU producer organisation in 2003 had a turnover of 9 million euro and over 300 members. 
Povprečna organizacija proizvajalcev v EU je imela v letu 2003 promet v višini 9 milijonov EUR in več kot 300 članov.
Fruit and vegetables is the largest agricultural sector by value of output in the EU-15. 
Sadje in zelenjava predstavljata po vrednosti proizvodnje največji kmetijski sektor v EU-15.
It is particularly important to the agricultural economies of Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal, where the sector represents over 25 % of the value of agricultural output. 
Pomembna sta zlasti za kmetijsko gospodarstvo Grčije, Španije, Italije in Portugalske, kjer ta sektor predstavlja več kot 25 % vrednosti kmetijske proizvodnje.
Spain, France and Italy together account for 70 % of EU fruit and vegetable production by value. 
Španija, Francija in Italija po vrednosti skupaj predstavljajo 70 % proizvodnje sadja in zelenjave v EU.
About a third of their production was marketed by producer organisations in 2004. 
Približno tretjino njihove proizvodnje so v letu 2004 tržile organizacije proizvajalcev.
In the Netherlands, Belgium and Ireland, the proportion of fruit and vegetable output marketed by producer organisations was much higher, at around 80 %, whereas in Greece it was 13 % and in Portugal 6 % (Diagram 3). 
Na Nizozemskem, v Belgiji in na Irskem je bil delež proizvodnje sadja in zelenjave, ki so ga tržile organizacije proizvajalcev, veliko višji, približno 80 %, medtem ko je bil v Grčiji 13 % in na Portugalskem 6 % (Diagram 3).
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 
2200/96 z dne 28. oktobra 1996 o skupni ureditvi trga za sadje in zelenjavo (UL L 297, 21.11.1996, str.
1). and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1432/2003 of 11 August 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 regarding the conditions for recognition of producer organisations and preliminary recognition of producer groups (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 
1432/2003 z dne 11. avgusta 2003 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2200/96 glede pogojev za priznanje organizacij proizvajalcev in začasno priznanje skupin proizvajalcev (UL L 203, 12.8.2003, str.
(2) Some exceptions are allowed in producer organisationsŐ operational programmes. 
(2) Nekatere izjeme so dovoljene v operativnih programih organizacij proizvajalcev.
See paragraph 42. 
Glej odstavek 42.
(3) Luxembourg has no producer organisations. 
(3) Luksemburg nima organizacij proizvajalcev.
Diagram 1 Number of producer organisations in 2004 Diagram 2 Average value of marketed production per producer organisation 2004 (Mio EUR) The aid for operational programmes 13. 
Diagram 1 Število organizacij proizvajalcev v letu 2004 Diagram 2 Povprečna vrednost tržene proizvodnje v letu 2004 po organizacijah proizvajalcev (v milijonih EUR) Pomoč za operativne programe 13.
Producer organisations that meet the conditions in paragraph 9 can apply for aid for an Ôoperational programmeŐ. 
Organizacije proizvajalcev, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje iz odstavka 9, lahko zaprosijo za pomoč za „operativni program“.
This is a programme of measures that a producer organisation undertakes to adapt its membersŐ production to market demand and strengthen its position in the marketplace (Text box 3). 
To je program ukrepov, ki ga sprejme organizacija proizvajalcev za prilagoditev proizvodnje svojih članov tržnemu povpraševanju in okrepitev svojega položaja na trgu (Okvir 3).
The specific objectives that the measures should aim to achieve are set in C 282/36 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 Diagram 3 the Council regulation (1) (Text box 4). 
Posebni cilji, C 282/36 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 20.11.2006 Diagram 3 ki naj bi jih ukrepi dosegli, so določeni v Uredbi Sveta (1) (Okvir 4).
The programme is drawn up by the producer organisation and approved by the Member State, which pays EU aid annually of 50 % of the costs incurred by the producer organisation in implementing the programme. 
Program pripravi organizacija proizvajalcev, odobri pa ga država članica, ki letno izplača pomoč EU v višini 50 % stroškov, ki jih je imela organizacija proizvajalcev pri izvajanju programa.
The duration of an operational programme is between three and five years, and at the end of the period a producer organisation may apply for a new programme. 
Operativni programi trajajo od tri do pet let, ob koncu tega obdobja pa lahko organizacija proizvajalcev zaprosi za pomoč za nov program.
There is an annual ceiling on the aid, set at 4,1 % of the producer organisationŐs turnover. 
Znesek letne pomoči je omejen, in sicer na 4,1 % prometa organizacije proizvajalcev.
Over 70 % of producer organisations have an operational programme and the aid amounted to 500 million euro in 2004. 
Več kot 70 % organizacij proizvajalcev ima operativni program in v letu 2004 je pomoč znašala 500 milijonov EUR.
This represented 3 % of producer organisationsŐ turnover and approximately 1 % of the total value of EU fruit and vegetable output. 
To je predstavljalo 3 % prometa organizacij proizvajalcev in približno 1 % skupne vrednosti proizvodnje sadja in zelenjave v EU.
Take-up of the aid has increased greatly since it was introduced in 1997, at the same time as the aid for the withdrawal of surplus production has decreased (Diagram 4). 
Iz-koriščenost pomoči se je od uvedbe leta 1997 močno povečala, hkrati pa se je zmanjšala pomoč za umik presežne proizvodnje (glej Diagram 4).
The diagram also shows the aid paid through producer organisations to growers of tomatoes and fruit for processing, which is based on the volume of production. 
V diagramu je prikazana tudi pomoč, izplačana prek organizacij proizvajalcev pridelovalcem paradižnika in sadja za predelavo, ki temelji na obsegu proizvodnje.
Text box 3 Typical contents of an operational programme Ń purchase of sorting and packing machinery Ń employment of quality control staff and marketing staff Ń investments in irrigation facilities and greenhouses Ń subsidies to growers for replanting fruit trees Ń costs of natural pest and disease control approaches (1) Regulation (EC) No 2200/96. 
Okvir 3 Značilna vsebina operativnega programa — Nakup opreme za sortiranje in pakiranje, — zaposlovanje osebja za nadzor kakovosti in trženje, — naložbe v namakalne sisteme in rastlinjake, — subvencije pridelovalcem za ponovno zasaditev sadnih dreves, — stroški za naravno odstranjevanje škodljivcev in nadzor nad boleznimi. (1) Uredba (ES) št. 2200/96.
Text box 4 The 11 operational programme objectives Ń ensuring that production is planned and adjusted to demand, particularly in terms of quality and quantity Ń promoting the concentration of supply and the placing on the market of the products produced by its members Ń reducing production costs and Ń stabilising producer prices Ń promoting the use of environmentally-sound cultivation practices, production techniques and waste-management practices Ń improvement of product quality Ń boosting productsŐ commercial value Ń promotion of the products targeted at consumers Ń creation of organic product lines Ń the promotion of integrated production or other methods of production respecting the environment Ń the reduction of withdrawals 15. 
Okvir 4 11 ciljev operativnih programov — Zagotavljanje, da se proizvodnjo načrtuje in usklajuje s povpraševanjem, zlasti glede kakovosti in količine, — pospeševanje koncentracije ponudbe in dajanje na trg proizvodov, ki jih pridelajo člani organizacije proizvajalcev, — zmanjševanje proizvodnih stroškov, in — stabilizacija proizvodnih cen, — pospeševanje okolju prijaznih načinov obdelovanja, pridelovalnih tehnik in ravnanja z odpadki, — izboljšanje kakovosti proizvodov, — zvišanje komercialne vrednosti proizvodov, — promocija proizvodov pri ciljnih potrošnikih, — ustvarjanje ekoloških pridelovalnih linij, — promocija integrirane pridelave ali drugih načinov proizvodnje, ki upoštevajo varstvo okolja, — zmanjševanje umikov s trga. 15.
Implementation of the aid scheme is on the usual shared management basis whereby Member States follow detailed rules, set by the Commission, within the framework of the Council Regulation. 
Izvajanje programa pomoči temelji na običajnem deljenem upravljanju, kjer države članice upoštevajo podrobna pravila, ki jih določi Komisija v okviru Uredbe Sveta.
They are required to cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the aid is granted according to the principles of sound financial management: economy, efficiency and effectiveness. 
Države članice morajo sodelovati s Komisijo, da se zagotovi dodeljevanje pomoči v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja: gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti.
Value of marketed production in 2004 
Vrednost tržene proizvodnje v letu 2004
The Commission implementing regulation (1) requires producer organisations to describe in their operational programme proposal: Ń their initial situation, in particular regarding production, marketing and equipment, Ń the objectives of the programme, bearing in mind the market outlook, and Ń the concrete measures or ÔactionsŐ proposed to achieve those objectives. 
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (1) od organizacij proizvajalcev zahteva, da v svojem predlogu operativnega programa opišejo: — svoje začetno stanje, zlasti v zvezi s proizvodnjo, trženjem in opremo, — cilje programa ob upoštevanju tržnih predvidevanj, in — konkretne ukrepe ali „dejavnosti“, predlagane za doseganje teh ciljev.