natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
190 ENISA,StrengtheningNetwork&InformationSecurity&ProtectingAgainstOnline Disinformation (“Fake News”), April 2018 191 EuropeanPoliticalandStrategyCentre(C.FrutosLópez),AResponsibilitytoSupport Electoral Organisations in Anticipating and Countering Cyber Threats, in: ibid, 2018. 
190 ENISA,StrengtheningNetwork&InformationSecurity&ProtectingAgainstOnline Disinformation (“Fake News”), april 2018. 191 Evropskosrediščezapolitičnostrategijo(C.FrutosLópez),AResponsibilitytoSupport Electoral Organisations in Anticipating and Countering Cyber Threats, v: ibid, 2018.
192 EuropeanCommission,ibid.,SWD(2018)403final,12September2018. 
192 Evropskakomisija,ibid.,SWD(2018)403final,12.september2018.
193 TheproposedRegulation(COM(2017)487final,13September2018)forFDIscreening, submitted in September 2017, is currently making its way through the legislative process. 
193 Predloguredbe(COM(2017)487final,13.september2017)zapregledovanjeneposrednih tujih naložb, predložen septembra 2017, je sedaj v zakonodajnem postopku.
It specifically covers critical technologies, which include artificial intelligence, cybersecurity and dual-use applications. 
Vanj so specifično vključene kritične tehnologije, ki vključujejo umetno inteligenco, kibernetsko varnost in aplikacije z dvojno rabo.
194 EuropeanCommission/EuropeanExternalActionService,ibid.,JOIN(2017)450final, 13 September 2017. 
194 Evropskakomisija/Evropskaslužbazazunanjedelovanje,ibid.,JOIN(2017)450final, 13. september2017.
ECA team This briefing paper Challenges to effective EU cybersecurity policy was adopted by Chamber III External actions/Security and justice, headed by ECA Member Bettina Jakobsen. 
Ekipa Evropskega računskega sodišča Ta informativni dokument z naslovom Izzivi za uspešno politiko EU za kibernetsko varnost je sprejel senat III – zunanji ukrepi, varnost in pravica –, ki mu predseduje članica Evropskega računskega sodišča Bettina Jakobsen.
The task was led by ECA Member Baudilio Tomé Muguruza, supported by Daniel Costa de Magalhaes, Head of Private Office and Ignacio Garcia de Parada, Private Office Attaché; Alejandro Ballester-Gallardo, Principal Manager; Michiel Sweerts, Head of Task; Simon Dennett, Aurelia Petliza, Mirko Iaconisi, Michele Scardone, Silvia Monteiro Da Cunha, auditors and Johannes Bolkart, intern. 
Nalogo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Baudilio Tomé Muguruza, pri tem pa so mu pomagali vodja njegovega kabineta Daniel Costa de Magalhaes in ataše v njegovem kabinetu Ignacio Garcia de Parada, vodilni upravni uslužbenec Alejandro Ballester-Gallardo, vodja naloge Michiel Sweerts ter revizorji Simon Dennett, Aurelia Petliza, Mirko Iaconisi, Michele Scardone, Silvia Monteiro Da Cunha in pripravnik Johannes Bolkart.
Hannah Critoph provided linguistic support. 
Jezikovno pomoč je zagotovila Hannah Critoph.
From left to right: Ignacio Garcia de Parada, Silvia Monteiro Da Cunha, Michele Scardone, Michiel Sweerts, Mirko Iaconisi, Baudilio Tomé Muguruza, Simon Dennett, Hannah Critoph, Daniel Costa de Magalhaes. 
Od leve proti desni: Ignacio Garcia de Parada, Silvia Monteiro Da Cunha, Michele Scardone, Michiel Sweerts, Mirko Iaconisi, Baudilio Tomé Muguruza, Simon Dennett, Hannah Critoph, Daniel Costa de Magalhaes.
© European Union, 2019 For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the European Union copyright, as f. ex. the logos in Figure 4, as well as Annex I and II, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. 
© Evropska unija, 2019. Za dovoljenje za uporabo ali reprodukcijo fotografij ali drugega gradiva, za katere Evropska unija nima avtorskih pravic, kot so npr. logotipi na sliki 4 ter v prilogah I in II, je treba zaprositi neposredno imetnike avtorskih pravic.
Cover page: © Syda Productions / Shutterstock.com EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors 
Naslovnica: © Syda Productions / Shutterstock.com EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Vprašanja: eca.europa.eu/sl/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Spletišče: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors
EN 2019 Delivering performance in Cohesion Briefing Paper June 2019 
SL 2019 Zagotavljanje smotrnosti na področju kohezije Informativni dokument Junij 2019
Contents Executive summary Introduction Performance in the EU Cohesion Objective and approach of the briefing paper Performance orientation in Cohesion Developments in the legislative framework for performance management Guiding principles 1 – Principles governing strategic planning 2 – Principles governing programming 3 – Principles governing implementation 4 – Principles governing monitoring and reporting 5 – Principle governing evaluation 6 – Cross-cutting principle Closing remarks Annex Annex I — Evolution of performance orientation in the legislation of Cohesion policy Endnotes ECA team Paragraph I-IX 01-07 01-02 03 04-07 08-124 08-11 12-124 13-29 30-56 57-78 79-104 105-113 114-124 125-129 2 
Vsebina Povzetek Uvod Smotrnost poslovanja v EU Kohezija Cilj in pristop v informativnem dokumentu Usmerjenost kohezijske politike v smotrnost Razvoj zakonodajnega okvira za upravljanje uspešnosti Vodilna načela 1 – Načela v zvezi s strateškim načrtovanjem 2 – Načela v zvezi z načrtovanjem programov 3 – Načela v zvezi z izvajanjem 4 – Načela v zvezi s spremljanjem in poročanjem 5 – Načelo v zvezi z vrednotenjem 6 – Načelo, ki se nanaša na več področij Zaključne pripombe Priloga Odstavek I-IX 01-07 01-02 03 04-07 08-124 08-11 12-124 13-29 30-56 57-78 79-104 105-113 114-124 125-129 Priloga I Razvoj usmerjenosti zakonodaje na področju kohezijske politike v smotrnost Končne opombe 2
Executive summary I The aim of the European Union’s (EU’s) Cohesion policy is to reduce disparities between EU regions in order to achieve balanced economic, social and territorial development. 
Povzetek I Namen kohezijske politike Evropske unije (EU) je zmanjšati razlike med regijami EU, da se doseže uravnotežen gospodarski, družbeni in teritorialni razvoj.
Approximately €350 billion, one third of the EU budget for 2014-2020, is allocated to this policy. 
Tej politiki je dodeljenih približno 350 milijard EUR, kar je ena tretjina proračuna EU za obdobje 2014–2020.
II Historically the EU has tended to focus on making sure that its budget spending complies with relevant rules. 
II V preteklosti se je EU običajno osredotočala na zagotavljanje skladnosti porabe proračunskih sredstev z ustreznimi pravili.
In recent years, however, the EU has sought to increase performance orientation, so that EU funds lead to positive changes for citizens. 
V zadnjih letih pa si je prizadevala povečati usmerjenost v smotrnost, da bi se s sredstvi EU zagotovile pozitivne spremembe za državljane.
In line with our Treaty responsibility to report on sound financial management, we have contributed significantly to this move. 
Sodišče je v skladu s svojo odgovornostjo iz Pogodbe glede poročanja o dobrem finančnem poslovodenju k temu znatno prispevalo.
III The current debate on performance orientation in Cohesion policy involves many stakeholders that have different, and sometimes contradictory, views on what performance orientation is and how it should be achieved. 
III V sedanjo razpravo o usmerjenosti kohezijske politike v smotrnost so vključeni številni deležniki, ki imajo različna in občasno nasprotna mnenja o tem, kaj je usmerjenost v smotrnost in kako bi jo bilo treba doseči.
This briefing paper represents a valuable source of information for all those involved in tackling the difficult political and practical challenges on how to improve performance orientation for the current and future programme periods. 
Ta informativni dokument je dragocen vir informacij za vse sodelujoče pri reševanju težkih političnih in praktičnih izzivov, povezanih s tem, kako v sedanjih in prihodnjih programskih obdobjih izboljšati usmerjenost v smotrnost.
IV The briefing paper presents our views on how performance orientation has evolved, from the previous programme period through to the Commission’s proposals for 2021-2027. 
IV V njem so predstavljena mnenja Sodišča o razvoju usmerjenosti v smotrnost od prejšnjega programskega obdobja do predlogov Komisije za obdobje 2021–2027.
We consider both the legislative framework, and its implementation at Commission and Member State level. 
Sodišče je obravnavalo tako zakonodajni okvir kot njegovo izvajanje na ravni Komisije in držav članic.
These principles cover the entire cycle of policy management, starting with strategic planning and moving through implementation until the reporting and evaluation stages. 
Ta načela zajemajo celoten cikel upravljanja politike od strateškega načrtovanja in izvajanja do poročanja in vrednotenja.
V On the basis of our extensive performance audit work in the area of Cohesion (69 reports), supplemented by reviews from other sources, we assessed how well these principles were applied for the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 programme periods and, on the assumption that the Commission’s proposals for the next period are implemented, how likely they are to be applied for the 2021-2027 programme period. 
V Sodišče je na podlagi obsežnih revizij smotrnosti poslovanja na področju kohezije (69 poročil), ki jih dopolnjujejo pregledi iz drugih virov, ocenilo, kako dobro so se ta načela uporabljala v programskih obdobjih 2007–2013 in 2014–2020, na podlagi predpostavke, da bodo predlogi Komisije za naslednje obdobje izvedeni, pa, kako verjetno je, da se bodo uporabila za programsko obdobje 2021–2027.
For those elements which have not yet been implemented – the 2021-2027 period and some parts of the 2014-2020 period – our assessment is based on the design of the systems in place. 
Ocena elementov, ki še niso bili izvedeni – obdobje 2021–2027 in nekateri deli obdobja 2014– 2020 – je temeljila na zasnovi vzpostavljenih sistemov.
VI We found that over these programme periods, the Commission has taken steps to include key design features for an effective system of performance management in both the general financial legislative framework and in the legislation specifically governing Cohesion. 
VI Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je Komisija v teh programskih obdobjih sprejela ukrepe za vključitev ključnih elementov zasnove uspešnega sistema upravljanja smotrnosti v splošni finančni zakonodajni okvir in v zakonodajo, ki posebej ureja kohezijo.
These key design features include defining good performance and the necessary conditions to achieve it, how to measure performance, and how to report and evaluate it. 
elementi zasnove vključujejo opredelitev dobre smotrnosti in potrebnih pogojev za njeno doseganje ter to, kako meriti smotrnost ter kako poročati o njej in jo vrednotiti.
The 2014-2020 period in particular saw significant changes. 
Zlasti za obdobje 2014–2020 so značilne bistvene spremembe.
VII These improvements in the legislative framework have not always been matched, however, by effective implementation on the ground. 
VII Kljub tem izboljšavam zakonodajnega okvira pa v praksi ni bilo vedno doseženo uspešno izvajanje.
Furthermore, one of the objectives of the proposed legislation for 2021-2027 is to simplify arrangements. 
Eden od ciljev predlagane zakonodaje za obdobje 2021–2027 je poenostavitev ureditev.
Simplification is an aim that, in principle, we endorse. 
Poenostavitev je cilj, ki ga Sodišče načeloma podpira.
However, in our view there is a risk that, in seeking simplification, the Commission’s proposals reduce the focus on performance. 
Meni pa, da pri prizadevanjih za poenostavitev obstaja tveganje, da bi se zaradi predlogov Komisije zmanjšala osredotočenost na smotrnost.
VIII Our assessment for each of the 14 guiding principles is summarised in Table 1 below. 
VIII Sodišče je ocenilo vseh 14 vodilnih načel, ocene pa so povzete v tabeli 1 spodaj.
The table shows that progress has been made in making Cohesion policy more performance-oriented, in particular as regards programming. 
Iz tabele je razvidno, da je bil pri zagotavljanju bolj v smotrnost usmerjene kohezijske politike dosežen napredek, zlasti v zvezi z načrtovanjem programov.
However, there remain a number of areas where there is scope for improvement: strategic planning, policy implementation, the generation and use of performance information in the monitoring/reporting and evaluation phases and ensuring sustainability. 
Še vedno bi bilo mogoče izboljšati rezultate na več področjih: strateško načrtovanje, izvajanje politike, ustvarjanje in uporaba informacij o smotrnosti poslovanja v fazah spremljanja/poročanja in vrednotenja ter zagotavljanje trajnostnosti.
Overall, we found that there are insufficient financial incentives for good performance. 
Na splošno je Sodišče ugotovilo, da za dobro smotrnost ni dovolj finančnih spodbud.
Table 1 – Assessment of the Guiding Principles per programme period 4 Programme periods Paragraph 2007-2013 2014-2020 2021-2027 1. 
Tabela 1 – Ocena vodilnih načel za posamezno programsko obdobje 4 Programska obdobja Odstavek 2007–2013 2014–2020 2021–2027 1.
Principles governing strategic planning 1. 
Načela v zvezi s strateškim načrtovanjem 1.
The EU has articulated a clear and consistent vision of what it wants to achieve with Cohesion policy funds, which needs to be owned and operationalised 14 to 23 2. 
EU je določila jasno in skladno vizijo, kaj želi doseči s skladi kohezijske politike, za katere sta potrebna občutek odgovornosti in operacionalizacija. 14 do 23 2.
The allocation of funding to Member States takes account of identified needs and is informed by performance information 24 to 29 2. 
Pri dodelitvi sredstev državam članicam se upoštevajo opredeljene potrebe in informacije o smotrnosti poslovanja. 24 do 29 2.
Principles governing programming 3. 
Načela v zvezi z načrtovanjem programov 3.
A clear intervention logic exists 31 to 38 4. 
Vzpostavljena je jasna intervencijska logika.
5 5. 
39 5.
A simple and consistent performance measurement framework is in place 40 to 49 6. 
Vzpostavljen je enostaven in skladen okvir za merjenje smotrnosti. 40 do 49 6.
Mechanisms to incentivise performance are in place 50 to 56 3. 
Vzpostavljeni so mehanizmi za spodbujanje smotrnosti. 50 do 56 3.
Principles governing implementation 7. 
5 7.
Member States spend their Cohesion policy funds in a timely way 58 to 64 8. 
Države članice pravočasno porabljajo sredstva iz skladov kohezijske politike. 58 do 64 8.
There is a performance-oriented approach when selecting and implementing projects 65 to 71 9. 
Pri izbiri in izvajanju projektov se uporablja pristop, ki je usmerjen v smotrnost. 65 do 71 9.
Revisions of programmes are informed by performance considerations including results 72 to 78 4. 
Pri reviziji programov se upoštevajo premisleki v zvezi s smotrnostjo, vključno z rezultati. 72 do 78 4.
Principles governing monitoring and reporting 10. 
Načela v zvezi s spremljanjem in poročanjem 10.
Monitoring systems ensure timely performance data of good quality 80 to 90 11. 
Sistemispremljanjazagotavljajo pravočasne in kakovostne podatke o smotrnosti. 80 do 90 11.
There is clear accountability for performance 91 to 98 12. 
Vzpostavljenajejasnaodgovornost za smotrnost. 91 do 98 12.
Performance information is used to take remedial action and support the strategic planning process 99 to 104 5. 
Informacijeosmotrnostiposlovanja se uporabljajo za sprejemanje popravljalnih ukrepov in podporo procesa strateškega načrtovanja. 99 do 104 5.
Principle governing evaluation 13. 
Načela v zvezi z vrednotenjem 13.
Evaluations at programme and policy level are used for decision making 106 to 113 6. 
Vrednotenjanaravniprogramovin politike se uporabljajo za odločanje. 106 do 113 6.
Cross-cutting principle 14. 
Načelo, ki se nanaša na več področij 14.
Sustainability is built into the cycle to ensure the longer-term effectiveness of public interventions 114 to 124 Source: ECA. 
Trajnostjevcikelvključenazaradi zagotavljanja dolgoročnejše uspešnosti javnih intervencij.
Red: Few of the underlying criteria are met. 
Rdeča: izpolnjenih je malo temeljnih meril.
Green: Underlying criteria are met in most respects. 
Zelena: temeljna merila so večinoma izpolnjena.
IX We have made many recommendations in previous reports on these issues – particularly in relation to GPs 1 and 9 which are marked in red for 2021-2027 in Table 1 above. 
IX Sodišče je v prejšnjih poročilih v zvezi s temi vprašanji izreklo veliko priporočil, zlasti v zvezi z vodilnima načeloma 1 in 9, ki sta v tabeli 1 zgoraj za obdobje 2021–2027 označeni z rdečo.
We have also pointed to the need to minimise delays throughout the cycle. 
Poudarilo je tudi, da je treba čim bolj zmanjšati zamude v celotnem ciklu.
Cumulative delays in implementation, together with overlapping eligibility periods, shift the focus away from performance considerations towards spending money. 
Zaradi kumulativne zamude pri izvajanju skupaj s prekrivanjem obdobij upravičenosti se pozornost preusmeri od premislekov v zvezi s smotrnostjo k porabi denarja.
Introduction Performance in the EU 01 The European Union (EU) spends around €140 billion each year. 
Uvod Smotrnost poslovanja v EU 01 Evropska unija (EU) vsako leto porabi približno 140 milijard EUR.
In recent years, there has been an increased focus on the extent to which this spending leads to positive benefits – performance. 
V zadnjih letih se vse bolj poudarja smotrnost, tj. v kolikšnem obsegu ta poraba vodi do pozitivnih koristi.
In EU legislation, performance tends to be referred to as “sound financial management”. 
V zakonodaji EU se smotrnost imenuje „dobro finančno poslovodenje“.
According to the Financial Regulation, “sound financial management” means implementation of the budget in accordance with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness, which it defines as follows1: o Economy – resources to be made available in due time, in appropriate quantity and quality and at the best price; o Efficiency – the best relationship between resources employed, activities undertaken and objectives achieved; o Effectiveness – the extent to which the objectives pursued are achieved through the activities undertaken. 
Glede na finančno uredbo „dobro finančno poslovodenje“ pomeni izvrševanje proračuna v skladu z načeli gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti, ki so opredeljeni, kot sledi1: o gospodarnost – finančni viri so na voljo pravočasno, v ustrezni količini in primerni kakovosti ter po najugodnejši ceni, o učinkovitost – najboljše razmerje med uporabljenimi sredstvi, izvedenimi dejavnostmi in doseženimi cilji, o uspešnost – obseg, v katerem so z izvedenimi dejavnostmi doseženi cilji.
02 The principle of economy relates to the inputs needed. 
02 Načelo gospodarnosti se nanaša na potrebne vložke.
Efficiency and effectiveness both involve what is achieved with these inputs, and therefore cover: o outputs – the deliverables of a programme; an airport, for example; o results – the immediate effects of the programme on direct addressees or recipients; the number of passengers using the airport; o impacts – longer term changes that are, at least partly, attributable to the EU action; the economic benefits derived from the airport (other factors might also be relevant, such as carbon emissions). 6 
Učinkovitost in tudi uspešnost sta povezani z dosežki teh vložkov in zato zajemata: o izložke – končni rezultat programa, na primer letališče, o rezultate – takojšnje učinke programa na neposredne naslovnike ali prejemnike, na primer število potnikov, ki uporabljajo letališče, o učinke – dolgoročnejše spremembe, ki jih je mogoče vsaj delno pripisati ukrepom EU, na primer gospodarske koristi zaradi letališča (pomembni bi lahko bili tudi drugi dejavniki, kot so emisije ogljika). 6
Cohesion 03 This briefing paper examines the performance orientation of one of the most important areas of EU activity – Cohesion. 
Kohezija 03 V tem informativnem dokumentu je preučena usmerjenost kohezije, ki je eno od najpomembnejših področij delovanja EU, v smotrnost.
Cohesion policies are designed to deliver one of the principal aims of the EU: “to promote economic, social and territorial cohesion among Member States”2.The evolution of how Cohesion funding and priorities have developed is shown in Table 2. 
Kohezijske politike so zasnovane tako, da zagotavljajo doseganje enega od glavnih ciljev EU: spodbujanje ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije med državami članicami.2 Razvoj kohezijskih sredstev in prioritet je prikazan v tabeli 2.
The table shows that: o Funding increased significantly from the outset, but has been more or less constant since the 2007-2013 period. o Before the 2007-2013 period, there was no stability in terms of the funds which contributed to Cohesion. 
V tabeli je prikazano, da: o se je financiranje od začetka znatno povečalo, vendar se od obdobja 2007–2013 skoraj ni spreminjalo, o pred obdobjem 2007–2013 ni bilo stabilnosti v zvezi s skladi, ki so prispevali h koheziji.
Since then they have remained the same. o Since the 2007-2013 period, the objectives of Cohesion have widened to include territorial (i.e. cross-border) cooperation, and objectives stemming from the EU’s long-term 10-year strategies3. o As at June 2019, there is no successor to the Europe 2020 strategy to which Cohesion spending, like other policy areas, will have to contribute. 7 
Od takrat pa se skladi niso spreminjali, o so se cilji na področju kohezije od obdobja 2007–2013 razširili tako, da vključujejo teritorialno (tj. čezmejno) sodelovanje in cilje dolgoročnih, desetletnih strategij EU,3 o od junija 2019 ni naslednice strategije Evropa 2020, h kateri bo morala prispevati poraba na področju kohezije in drugih področjih. 7