natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
TheCommissionshouldfurtherimprovethequality of its ex-ante controls on the procurement procedures and interim/final payments and ensure that ex-post control functions are covered by work programmes. 
8.33 Komisijabimoralanadaljeizboljšatikakovostsvojih predhodnih kontrol postopkov za oddajo javnega naročila in vmesnih/končnih plačil ter zagotoviti, da funkcije naknadne kontrole pokrivajo delovni programi.
For joint management with ESA, the Commission should closely monitor the effective functioning of ESA’s control systems and the reliability of its annual financial report covering the implementation of activities financed under the GMES dele­ gation agreement. 8.34. Afollow-upofpreviousobservationsissummarised in Annex 8.4. 
Pri skupnem upravljanju z ESA bi morala Komisija skrbno spremljati uspešnost delo­ vanja kontrolnih sistemov ESA in zanesljivost njenega letnega finančnega poročila, ki pokriva izvajanje dejavnosti, financi­ ranih v okviru sporazuma o prenosu pooblastil na GMES.
EN 188 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S RESULTS OF THE AUDIT OF THE GUARANTEE FUND FOR EXTERNAL ACTIONS 8.35. ThepurposeoftheGuaranteeFundforExternal Actions (17) (the Fund), which guarantees loans to third countries, is to reimburse the Community’s creditors (18) in the event of a beneficiary’s defaulting on a loan and to avoid direct calls on the Community budget. 
SL 188 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A REZULTATI REVIZIJE JAMSTVENEGA SKLADA ZA ZUNANJE UKREPE 8.35 Namen Jamstvenega sklada za zunanje ukrepe (17) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklad), ki jamči za posojila tretjim državam, je poplačati upnike Skupnosti (18) v primeru, da upra­ vičenec ne odplača posojila, in preprečiti neposredne zahtevke za plačila iz proračuna Skupnosti.
The adminis­ trative management of the Fund is carried out by the Direc­ torate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN) while the European Investment Bank (EIB) is responsible for its treasury management. 
Administrativno ga upravlja Generalni direktorat za gospodarske in finančne zadeve (GD ECFIN), njegovo zakladnico pa vodi Evropska investicijska banka (EIB).
At 31 December 2009, the Fund’s total resources were 1 240 million euro, compared with 1 091 million euro at 31 December 2008. 
8.36 Nadan31.decembra2009soskupnasredstvasklada znašala 1 240 milijonov EUR, 31. decembra 2008 pa 1 091 milijonov EUR.
No guarantee calls were made on the Fund in the year under review. 8.37. 
V pregledanem letu ni sklad prejel nobenega poziva za izpolnitev jamstva.
The return on the Fund’s portfolio in 2009 amounted to 4,6 %, compared with a benchmark return of 3,78 %. 
Donos portfelja sklada je leta 2009 znašal 4,6 % v primerjavi s primerjalnim donosom 3,78 %.
TheinvestmentportfoliooftheGuaranteeFundis managed by the EIB on behalf of the European Commu­ nities (19) whereas the investments portfolio of the ECSC i.L. is managed by a dedicated unit of DG-ECFIN. 
8.38 NaložbeniportfeljJamstvenegaskladazaEvropski skupnosti upravlja EIB(19), naložbeni portfelj ESPJ v l. pa posebna enota GD ECFIN.
The investment objectives of both portfolios are fairly similar — e.g. risk appetite, type and quality of investments as well as investment restrictions. 
Naložbeni cilji obeh portfeljev so si dokaj podobni – npr. pripravljenost na tveganje, vrsta in kakovost naložb ter naložbene omejitve.
The financial benefits of both funds being managed by the unit of DG-ECFIN have not been assessed. 
Finančne koristi, ki bi jih prineslo upravljanje obeh skladov s strani enote GD ECFIN, niso bile ocenjene.
Overall, the Court considers that during 2009 the Guarantee Fund was managed in a satisfactory manner and that appropriate actions have been taken to monitor the impact of the financial crisis on the Fund’s portfolio. _____________ (17) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 of 31 October 1994 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions (OJ L 293, 12.11.1994, p. 
8.39 Sodišče meni, da je bilo upravljanje Jamstvenega sklada v letu 2009 na splošno zadovoljivo in da so bili sprejeti primerni ukrepi za spremljanje učinka finančne krize na port­ felj sklada. _____________ (17) Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94 z dne 31. oktobra 1994 o ustanovitvi Jamstvenega sklada za zunanje ukrepe (UL L 293, 12.11.1994, str.
1), as last amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 89/2007 (OJ L 22, 31.1.2007, p. 
1), kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 89/2007 (UL L 22, 31.1.2007, str.
(18) Principally the EIB, but also Euratom external lending and EC macro financial assistance (MFA) loans to third countries. 
(18) Zlasti EIB, vendar tudi zunanja posojila Euratom in posojila tretjim državam v okviru makrofinančne pomoči ES (MFA).
(19) Article 6 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 and the EIB receives an annual management fee for the services provided. 
(19) Člen 6 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 8.38. The Commission considers that there are operational and financial risk diversification benefits deriving from the fact that funds are managed by two institutions. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 8.38 Komisija meni, da dejstvo, da sklad upravljata dve instituciji, prinaša koristi z vidika diverzifikacije poslovnega in finančnega tveganja.
It is in fact a practice followed by the ministries of finance and national central banks of most Member States to outsource some of the management of their funds to third parties. 
Tako prakso dejansko uporabljajo finančna ministrstva in nacionalne centralne banke večine držav članic, ki del upravljanja svojih sredstev oddajajo tretjim strankam.
Both the EIB and the Commission have the capacity to manage the assets of the Fund in a similar way and with similar financial results. 
EIB in Komisija lahko podobno in s podobnimi finančnimi rezultati upravljata sredstva sklada.
Therefore, there is no performance-related reason to propose an amendment to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 of 25 May 2009 (codified version) by which the management of the assets of the Guarantee Fund for external actions has been given to the EIB. 
Zato z nobenim pomislekom glede učinkovitosti ni mogoče utemeljiti predloga spremembe člena 7 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 189 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S RESULTS OF THE AUDIT OF THE ECSC IN LIQUIDATION 8.40. After the expiry of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community on 23 July 2002, the assets and liabilities of the ECSC were transferred to the European Community (20). 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 189 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A REZULTATI REVIZIJE ESPJ V LIKVIDACIJI 8.40 KosejePogodbaoustanovitviEvropskeskupnostiza premog in jeklo 23. julija 2002 iztekla, so se sredstva in obveznosti ESPJ prenesla na Evropsko skupnost (20).
Their net worth, referred to as the European Coal and Steel Community in Liquidation (ECSC i.L.), is allocated to research in the coal and steel industry. 
Njihova neto vrednost, imenovana Evropska skupnost za premog in jeklo v likvidaciji (ESPJ v l.), je dodeljena raziskavam v industriji premoga in jekla.
At 31 December 2009, the total assets of the ECSC i.L. were 2 011 million euro, compared with 2 045 million euro at 31 December 2008. 
8.41 SkupnasredstvaESPJvl.so31.decembra2009 znašala 2 011 milijonov EUR v primerjavi z 2 045 milijoni EUR 31. decembra 2008.
The net profit for 2009 was 13,9 million euro compared to a net loss of 14,8 million euro in 2008. 
Neto dobiček za leto 2009 je znašal 13,9 milijona EUR v primerjavi z neto izgubo 14,8 milijona EUR v letu 2008.
8.42. ThenetrevenueofECSCi.L.investmentsin2009 amounted to 68 million euro and will be made available to the Community budget for financing research for coal and steel projects. 
8.42 NetoprihodkiodnaložbESPJvl.soleta2009znašali 68 milijonov EUR in bodo na voljo proračunu Skupnosti za financiranje raziskav za projekte v zvezi s premogom in jeklom.
The Court noted that as at 31 December 2009 the unused budget available for financing coal and steel research had accumulated to 238 million euro (21). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da 31. decembra 2009 neporab­ ljen proračun za raziskave na področju premoga in jekla znaša 238 milijonov EUR (21).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 8.43. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 8.43 Vletu2009jebilauspešnostportfeljaESPJvl.
The performance of the ECSC i.L portfolio was 5,85 % for the year 2009 while the return of the benchmark, serving as reference rate for the ECSC i.L., was 4,41 %. 
5,85 %, primerjalni donos, ki je referenčna stopnja za ESPJ v l., pa 4,41 %.
The winding-up of the financial operations of the ECSC i.L. is proceeding in compliance with the relevant legis­ lation, including the multiannual financial guidelines. 
8.44 Zaključevanje finančnih poslov ESPJ v l. poteka v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo, vključno z večletnimi finanč­ nimi smernicami.
The Court noted that appropriate actions had been taken to monitor the impact of the financial crisis on the assets of the ECSC i.L. _____________ (20) Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (OJ C 80, 10.3.2001. p. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so bili sprejeti primerni ukrepi za spremljanje učinka finančne krize na sred­ stva ESPJ v l. _____________ (20) Protokol o finančnih posledicah izteka Pogodbe o Evropski skup­ nosti za premog in jeklo ter o Raziskovalnem skladu za premog in jeklo (UL C 80, 10.3.2001, str.
(21) Including the allocations for 2011 amount to 61 million euro and for 2010 to 54 million euro. 
(21) Vključno z dodelitvami za leto 2011 v višini 61 milijonov EUR in za leto 2010 v višini 54 milijonov EUR.
8.42. — outstanding amounts (123 million euros) related to contracts signed since 2003, in respect of which the closure of accounts is not yet completed for all partners of the project. 
8.42 Neporabljeni proračun v višini 238 milijonov EUR zajema: — dodelitev za leto 2010, za katero obveznosti še niso bile prevzete (54 mio EUR), — dodelitev za leto 2011 (61 mio EUR), — neporavnani zneski (123 mio EUR) v zvezi s pogodbami, podpi­ sanimi od leta 2003, v zvezi s katerimi knjigovodski računi za vse partnerje projekta še niso zaključeni.
The decom­ mitment can be processed two months after the last closure of accounts of the contract. 
Prevzete obveznosti se lahko začnejo sproščati dva meseca po zadnji zaključitvi računov pogodbe.
The average duration of a RFCS contract is three years, and most of the outstanding amount is related to contracts not yet finished or for which the final technical report has not been approved (condition for the last payment and the closure of accounts). 
Pogodbe Raziskovalnega sklada za premog in jeklo povprečno trajajo tri leta, večina neporavnanih zneskov pa je povezana s pogodbami, ki še niso bile končane ali za katere končno tehnično poročilo še ni bilo odobreno (pogoj za zadnje plačilo in zaključitev računov).
Therefore, it is only natural that the amount of 238 million euros was still unused at 31 December 2009. 
Zato je povsem naravno, da znesek 238 milijonov EUR 31. decembra 2009 še ni bil porabljen.
EN 190 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 SIZE AND STRUCTURE OF THE SAMPLE Total transactions (of which): 48 Interim/Final payments 20 27 27 1 1 0 0 4 3 51 45 40 RESULTS OF TESTING (in % and numbers of transactions) Transactions not affected by error 54 % {28} Transactions affected by error 46% {20} 100 % 0% {27} {0} 100 % 0% {1} {0} N/A N/A N/A N/A 75 % 25% {3} {1} 74 % 26% {59} {21} 86 % 14% 93 % 7% ESTIMATED IMPACT OF QUANTIFIABLE ERRORS Policy area 02 — Enterprise Policy area 01 — Economic and Financial Affairs Policy area 03 — Competition Policy area 12 — Internal Market Policy area 20 — Trade Total 2008 2007 ANNEX 8.1 RESULTS OF TRANSACTION TESTING FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS 80 80 55 Advances 280001293515 Most likely error rate: < 2% X X 2 % to 5 % X > 5% 2009 
SL 190 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 VELIKOST IN STRUKTURA VZORCA Transakcije skupaj (od tega): Predplačila 48 28 20 27 0 27 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 3 80 80 55 35 15 Vmesna/končna plačila REZULTATI PREIZKUŠANJA 29 51 45 40 (v % in po številu transakcij) Transakcije, na katere niso vplivale napake 54 % 46% {28} {20} 100 % 0% {27} {0} 100 % 0% {1} {0} NR NR NR NR 75 % 25% {3} {1} 74 % 26% {59} {21} 86 % 14% 93 % 7% Transakcije, na katere so vplivale napake OCENJENI UČINEK KOLIČINSKO OPREDELJIVIH NAPAK podjetništvo gospodarske in fina­ nčne zadeve konkurenca notranji trg trgovina PRILOGA 8.1 REZULTATI PREIZKUŠANJA TRANSAKCIJ ZA GOSPODARSKE IN FINANČNE ZADEVE 2009 Področje politike 02 – Področje politike 01 – Področje politike 03 – Področje politike 12 – Področje politike 20 – Skupaj 2008 2007 Najverjetnejša stopnja napake: < 2% X X 2 % do 5 % X > 5%
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 191 ANNEX 8.2 RESULTS OF EXAMINATION OF SYSTEMS FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS Assessment of selected supervisory and control systems System concerned Policy area 01 — Economic and Financial Affairs Policy area 02 — Enterprise Policy area 03 — Competition Policy area 12 — Internal Market Policy area 20 — Trade (1) Effective for DG Enterprise and Industry, partially effective for EACI and not effective for ESA and REA. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 191 PRILOGA 8.2 REZULTATI PREVERJANJA SISTEMOV ZA GOSPODARSKE IN FINANČNE ZADEVE Ocena izbranih nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov Zadevni sistem Področje politike 01 – gospodarske in finančne zadeve Področje politike 02 – podjetništvo Področje politike 03 – konkurenca Področje politike 12 – notranji trg Področje politike 20 – trgovina (1) Uspešno za GD za podjetništvo in industrijo, delno uspešno za EACI ter neuspešno za ESA in REA.
Overall assessment Ex-ante checks Audit certification Ex-post financial audit N/A (1) N/A N/A Overall assessment of supervisory and control systems Overall assessment 2007 2009 2008 Legend: N/A Effective Partially effective Not effective Not applicable: does not apply or not assessed 
Skupna ocena Predhodni pregledi Revizijsko potrjevanje Naknadna revizija računo­ vodskih izkazov NR (1) NR NR Skupna ocena nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov Skupna ocena 2007 2009 2008 Legenda NR uspešno delno uspešno neuspešno ni relevantno: se ne uporablja ali ni bilo ocenjeno
A ECFIN without reservations N/A The previous reservation concerning problems with the implementation of ‘additionality requirements’ for a financial programme was lifted. 
A ECFIN brez pridržkov NR Umaknjen je bil prejšnji pridržek o težavah v zvezi z „zahtevami dodatnosti“ za finančni program.
The Court reviewed the completion of the action plan and obtained evidence that the final checks concerning the effectiveness of the improved control systems were put in place. reservations 1. 
Sodišče je pregledalo dokončanje akcijskega načrta in pridobilo dokaze, da so bili uvedeni končni pregledi v zvezi z uspešnostjo izboljšanih kontrolnih sistemov. ENTR s pridržki 2.
Reservation concerning the rate of residual error with regard to the accuracy of cost claims in the Sixth Research Framework Programme (FP6). 
Pridržek v zvezi s stopnjo preostale napake pri točnosti zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov v 6. okvirnem programu za raziskave (6. OP).
The amount at risk in respect of FP7 cost claims is assessed by DG ENTR as not material in 2009 and therefore no reservation is made. 
Po oceni GD ENTR ogroženi znesek pri zahtevkih za povračilo stroškov za 7. OP za leto 2009 ni pomemben, zato ni izrečen noben pridržek.
However, the Court has noted the potential material error in FP7 cost claims from 2010. 
Vendar je Sodišče opazilo potencialno pomembno napako pri zahtevkih za stroške za 7.
Regularity of underlying transactions Action taken Court analysis Commission reply In 2007, the Court identified regularity errors in three payments which were financed either under the fifth or the sixth Framework Programmes for research and tech­ nological development. 
A 5. 6.
The errors detected were principally due to: inadequate or missing supporting evidence to justify the cost claimed; the use of budgeted figures which does not comply with the contractual requirements to use actual cost; and inclusion of various ineligible costs. 
Ugotovljene napake so bile predvsem posledica: neustreznih ali manjkajočih dokazil, ki bi upravičila prijavljene stroške; uporabe v proračunu predvidenih stroškov, ki ni skladna s pogodbenimi zahtevami po uporabi dejanskih stroškov, ter vključitve različnih neupravičenih stroškov.
The Commission has made financial corrections for the errors identified in the sample, either by issuing a recovery order or by adjusting payments to the beneficiaries in subsequent periods. 
Komisija je izvedla finančne popravke za napake, ugotovljene v vzorcu, tako da je izdala nalog za izterjavo ali prilagodila plačila upra­ vičencemvnaslednjihobdobjih.
The Commission has followed up the errors identified by the Court and taken appropriate corrective action. 
Komisija je ukrepala glede napak, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, in sprejela ustrezne popravne ukrepe.
The Commission will continue to correct the errors identified and agreed upon. 
Komisija bo še naprej popravljala ugotovljene in spre­ jete napake.
(2007 Annual Report, paragraphs 10.16 and 10.17) 2. 
(Letno poročilo za leto 2007, odstavka 10.16 in 10.17.) 2.
Audit certification of project cost statements The EU financial rules require that cost statements above a certain threshold have to be accompanied by an audit certificate. 
Revizijsko potrjevanje izjav o stroških projektov Finančna pravila EU zahtevajo, da mora izjave o stroških, ki presegajo določen prag, spremljati revizijsko potrdilo.
In three projects the certifying auditor issued an unqualified opinion whereas the Court detected serious quantifiable errors. 
Za tri projekte je revizor, ki izvaja potrjevanje, izrekel mnenje brez pridržka, čeprav je Sodišče našlo resne količinsko opredeljive napake.
For FP7 the Commission aimed to further improve the reliability of audit certificates by using ‘agreed upon procedures’, setting out in detail the audit work to be performed by the certifying auditors issuing the ‘certificate on the financial statements’ and encouraging ex-ante certification of the cost methodology. 
OP skušala nadalje izboljšati zanesljivost revizijskih potrdil s pomočjo uporabe „dogovorjenih postopkov“, podrobne določitve revizijskega dela, ki ga morajo opraviti revizorji, ki izvajajo potrjevanje in izdajo „potrdilo o računovodskih izkazih“, ter spodbu­ janja predhodnega potrjevanja metodologije obračunavanja stroškov.
These measures are unlikely to have a positive impact on the number of cost statements with errors in them in the short term because as at the end of 2009, DG ENTR has not yet executed a payment accompanied by such a certificate and the Commission had accepted the cost methodologies of only 11 beneficiaries. 
Malo verjetno je, da bodo imeli ti ukrepi krat­ koročno pozitiven učinek na število izjav o stroških, ki vsebujejo napake, saj GD ENTR do konca leta 2009 še ni izvršil nobenega plačila, ki bi ga spremljalo tako potrdilo, Komisija pa je potrdila metodologije obračunavanja stroškov za samo 11 upravičencev.
FP7 establishes a threshold at the level of 375 000 EUR (EU contribution in cumulative terms per participant per project) to trigger the submission of an audit certificate. 
OP je vzpostavljen prag 375 000 EUR (kumu­ lativen prispevek EU na udeleženca na projekt), nad katerim je treba obvezno predložiti revizijsko potrdilo.
Most FP7 projects are only in their first reporting period which explains the limited number of certificates on financial statements at the end of 2009. 
OP je šele v prvem obdobju poročanja, kar pojasnjuje majhno število potrdil o računovodskih izkazih ob koncu leta 2009.
As regards ex ante certification of the cost methodology, at the end of May 2010, the Commission had accepted the cost methodologies of 25 beneficiaries. 
Glede predhodnega potrjevanja metodologije obračunavanja stroškov je do konca maja 2010 Komisija sprejela metodologije obračunavanja stroškov 25 upravičencev.
(2007 Annual Report, paragraphs 10.27 to 10.30) ANNEX 8.4 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS 
(Letno poročilo za leto 2007, odstavki 10.27 do 10.30.) PRILOGA 8.4 NADALJNJE UKREPANJE PO PREJŠNJIH OPAŽANJIH ZA GOSPODARSKE IN FINANČNE ZADEVE
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 195 CHAPTER 9 Administrative and other expenditure TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 9.1-9.8 Specific characteristics of the policy group Parliament Paragraph 9.3-9.5 9.6-9.8 9.9 9.10 9.11 9.12-9.27 9.13-9.16 Council 9.17 Commission 9.18-9.20 Court of Justice 9.21 Court of Auditors 9.22 European Economic and Social Committee 9.23 Committee of the Regions 9.24 European Ombudsman 9.25 European Data Protection Supervisor 9.26-9.27 Conclusions and recommendation 9.28-9.31 European Agencies and Executive Agencies 9.32-9.34 European Schools 9.35-9.37 Audit scope and approach Regularity of transactions Compliance of systems with the financial regulation Reliability of Commission management representations Observations on specific Institutions 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 195 Uvod Posebne značilnosti te skupine politik Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Odstavek 9.1–9.8 9.3–9.5 9.6–9.8 9.9 9.10 9.11 9.12–9.27 9.13–9.16 9.17 9.18–9.20 9.21 9.22 9.23 9.24 9.25 9.26–9.27 9.28–9.31 9.32–9.34 9.35–9.37 Pravilnost transakcij Skladnost sistemov s finančno uredbo Zanesljivost poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije Opažanja o posameznih institucijah Parlament Svet Komisija Sodišče Evropske unije Računskosodišče Evropski ekonomsko–socialni odbor Odbor regij Evropski varuh človekovih pravic Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov Zaključki in priporočilo Agencije EU in izvajalske agencije Evropske šole POGLAVJE 9 Upravni in drugi odhodki KAZALO
EN 196 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S INTRODUCTION 9.1. This chapter presents the Court’s specific assessment of administrative expenditure of the Institutions and bodies of the European Union. 
SL 196 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A UVOD 9.1 Sodišče v tem poglavju predstavlja svojo posebno oceno o upravnih odhodkih institucij in organov Evropske unije.
Key information on the Institutions and bodies covered, and on the spending in 2009 is provided in Table 9.1. 
Ključne informacije o obravnavanih institucijah in organih ter o porabi v letu 2009 so v tabeli 9.1.
Table 9.1 — Administrative expenditure of the institutions — Key information (million euro) Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Budget Title Policy area Description Payments 2009 Management Mode Administrative and other expenditure European Parliament Council Commission Court of Justice Court of Auditors Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions European Ombudsman European Data Protection Supervisor 1 466 659 6 358 307 123 117 86 8 5 Sections I, II and IV-IX. 
Tabela 9.1 – Upravni odhodki institucij – ključne informacije Oddelki I, II in IV–IX. Za oddelek III, poglavje 1 vseh naslovov in naslovi 14, 24–27 in 29 neposredno neposredno neposredno neposredno neposredno neposredno neposredno neposredno neposredno (v milijonih EUR) centralizirano centralizirano centralizirano centralizirano centralizirano centralizirano centralizirano centralizirano centralizirano Proračunski naslov Področje politike Opis Plačila za leto 2009 Način upravljanja Upravni in drugi odhodki Evropski parlament Svet Komisija Sodišče Evropske unije Računsko sodišče Ekonomsko-socialni odbor Odbor regij Evropski varuh človekovih pravic Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov 1 466 659 6 358 307 123 117 86 8 5 Upravni odhodki skupaj 9 129 Operativni odhodki skupaj Plačila za leto skupaj 9 129 Obveznosti za leto skupaj 9 224 Vir: Letni računovodski izkazi za leto 2009.