natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission is pleased that the Court appreciates its continuous efforts to promote better understanding of the new instruments under FP6, including its quick response to external evaluations. 
Komisija je zadovoljna, da se Sodišče zaveda njenih nenehnih prizadevanj za spodbujanje boljšega razumevanja novih instrumentov v okviru 6. OP, vključno z njenim hitrim odzivanjem na zunanja ocenjevanja.
The European research community by and large understood and used the new instruments well. 
Evropska raziskovalna skupnost je nova instrumenta v glavnem pravilno razumela in uporabljala.
The introduction of new instruments unavoidably brought the need for proposers to become familiar with new notions in terms of the negotiations to be carried out and the data to be submitted, elements that very often made necessary further contacts and exchanges between participants themselves, an always time-consuming process. 
Pri uvedbi novih instrumentov se ni bilo mogoče izogniti potrebi po tem, da se predlagatelji seznanijo z novimi pojmi v smislu pogajanj, ki jih je treba izvesti, in podatki, ki jih je treba predložiti, ti elementi pa so zelo pogosto zahtevali nadaljnje stike in izmenjave med samimi udeleženci, kar je vedno dolgotrajen proces.
Further, the obligation imposed on the Commission by the legislator (the Council, in this case) to receive a (positive) opinion on all IPs and NoEs to be funded (irrespective of the amount of Community contribution) contributed to making the time-to-contract longer. 
Tudi zaradi obveznosti, ki jo je Komisiji naložil zakonodajalec (v tem primeru Svet), da mora dobiti (pozitivno) mnenje o vseh integriranih projektih in mrežah odličnosti, ki naj bi se financirali (ne glede na znesek prispevka Skupnosti), se je čas za sklepanje pogodb še podalj-šal.
Moreover, the time is comparable to that of other major funding agencies in the world. 
Poleg tega je navedeni čas primerljiv s časom drugih večjih agencij za financiranje v svetu.
As regards the negotiation process, modifications on the project scope were always done in the context of the FP’s legal framework. 
Kar zadeva pogajalski postopek, se je obseg projekta vedno spreminjal v skladu s pravnim okvirom okvirnega programa.
However, the Commission recalls that one of the most important aspects of these new instruments, repeatedly brought forward in various guidance documents, was the enhanced role of the consortia themselves (and, in particular, of the coordinators) concerning the internal management of the project. Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
Kljub temu opozarja, da je bil eden od najpomembnejših vidikov teh novih instrumentov, ki se je večkrat poudarjal v različnih smernicah, okrepljena vloga samih konzorcijev (in zlasti koordinatorjev) pri notranjem upravljanju projekta. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2009 – „Mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje?
The Commission strongly endorses the importance of project monitoring, carried out through a variety of means including the detailed attention of project officers. 
Komisija se zelo strinja, da je pomembno spremljanje projektov, ki se izvaja na različne načine, med drugim z veliko pozor-nostjo projektnih uradnikov.
It recognises however, that there have been some cases, often for individual and specific reasons, where independent review was not carried out. 
Kljub temu priznava, da je bilo nekaj primerov, pogosto iz individualnih in posebnih razlogov, ko neodvisen pregled ni bil izveden.
A common template for the reviewers’ report was prepared for all Research DGs. 
Za vse generalne direktorate, povezane z raziskavami, je bil pripravljen enotni obrazec poročila pregledovalcev.
A basic common guidance document was also prepared and given to the different services to adapt to their own needs. 
Pripravljene so bile tudi temeljne skupne smernice, ki so jih prejele različne službe, da bi jih prilagodile svojim potrebam.
The Commission acknowledges the Court’s findings. 
Komisija se strinja z ugotovitvami Sodišča.
The Commission would like to stress, however, that the EU contribution to the private sector under FP6 increased significantly by more than 1 billion euro in comparison to FP5. 
Kljub temu želi poudariti, da se je prispevek EU za zasebni sektor v okviru 6. OP zelo povečal – za več kot 1 milijardo EUR – v primerjavi s 5.
It is also true that the situation differs by sectors. 
Res je tudi, da se položaj od sektorja do sektorja razlikuje.
The Commission considers that FP6 had a positive influence on industrial competitiveness. 
Komisija meni, da je 6. OP pozitivno vplival na industrijsko konkurenčnost.
Furthermore, it would like to add that when taking into account public and private organisations engaged in commercial activities (the business enterprise sector) participation rates are similar to those of FP5. 
Poleg tega želi dodati, da je ob upoštevanju javnih in zasebnih organizacij, ki se ukvarjajo s poslovnimi dejavnostmi (poslovno-podjetniški sektor), stopnja udeležbe podobna kot pri 5.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 57.
The Commission considers that the FPs have always been based on a sound intervention logic. 
Komisija meni, da so okvirni programi vedno temeljili na dobro premišljeni logiki posega.
Under FP6, the legislative acts and the Commission’s work programmes and information material of various types provided a coherent stream and wealth of information on intervention logic, objectives, justification of the efforts and their European added value, actions envisaged, rationale and operational framework of application for all instruments to be used and other helpful information for the proposers and project participants. 
V okviru 6. OP so se z zakonodajnimi akti, delovnimi programi Komisije in različnimi vrstami informativnega gradiva zagotovili dosleden pretok in velika količina informacij o logiki posega, ciljih, utemeljitvi prizadevanj in njihovi evropski dodani vrednosti, načrtovanih ukrepih, načelih in operativnem okviru uporabe za vse instrumente, ki naj bi se uporabljali, ter druge koristne informacije za predlagatelje in udeležence projektov.
Despite the fact that this approach was not explicit in the Financial Regulation applicable at the moment of the FP6 preparation and adoption, essential elements of the ‘SMART’ approach were nevertheless taken up in the Commission’s work programmes under FP6. 
Čeprav tak pristop ni bil izrecno določen v finančni uredbi, ki se je uporabljala ob pripravi in sprejetju 6. OP, so bili bistveni elementi pristopa SMART kljub temu povzeti v delovnem programu Komisije v okviru 6.
Under FP7, all work programmes contain expected impact statements, which correspond with the objectives, rationale and activities set out in the Specific Programmes. 
Vsi delovni programi v okviru 7. OP vsebujejo izjave o pričakovanem učinku, ki ustrezajo ciljem, načelom in dejavnostim iz posebnih programov.
The Commission considers that FP6 was properly monitored and evaluated. 
Komisija meni, da sta bila spremljanje in ocenjevanje 6.
Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
Posebno poročilo št. 8/2009 – „Mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje?
40 Recommendation No 1 The Commission considers that the FPs have always been based on a sound intervention logic which has allowed effective evaluation and monitoring. 
40 Priporočilo št. 1 Komisija meni, da so okvirni programi vedno temeljili na dobro premišljeni logiki posega, kar je omogočilo učinkovito ocenjevanje in spremljanje.
This will help further strengthen the evaluation and monitoring system. 
To bo pripomoglo k dodatni okrepitvi sistema ocenjevanja in spremljanja.
Under FP7, instead of being encapsulated in the ‘instruments’, research goals and research policy objectives, including those aiming at structuring research efforts, are clearly and explicitly set in the work programmes. 
Namesto da bi bili cilji raziskav in raziskovalne politike, skupaj s tistimi za oblikovanje raziskovalnih prizadevanj, vključeni v „instrumente“, so v okviru 7. OP jasno in izrecno določeni v delovnih programih.
For each topic on which proposals are invited, the scientific goals, the scope of activities and indications on the results expected are defined. 
Za vsako temo, za katero se lahko predložijo predlogi, so opredeljeni znanstveni cilji, obseg dejavnosti in pričakovani rezultati.
There was a large number of NoEs where lasting integration among partners was achieved and the overall quality of projects was deemed high (the overall assessment in Figure 5 shows the NoEs’ quality to be ‘acceptable’ and ‘good to excellent’ with a total percentage of above 80 %). 
V številnih mrežah odličnosti je bilo doseženo trajno povezovanje med partnerji, skupna kakovost projektov pa se je štela za visoko (iz skupne ocene v diagramu 5 je razvidno, da je kakovost mrež odličnosti skupaj v več kot 80 % „sprejemljiva“ in „dobra do odlična“).
Almost two thirds of NoEs achieved full restructuring of activities and integration between partners. 
V skoraj dveh tretjinah mrež odličnosti sta bili doseženi polno preoblikovanje dejavnosti in povezovanje med partnerji.
The possibility of continuing the financing of certain promising FP6 NoEs under FP7 is addressed on a case-by-case basis. 
Možnost nadaljnjega financiranja nekaterih obetavnih mrež odličnosti iz 6. OP v okviru 7.
In fact, an FP6 NoE’s duration may be prolonged without new funding (cases of these currently exist). 
Dejansko se lahko trajanje mreže odličnosti iz 6. OP podaljša brez novega financiranja (taki primeri trenutno obstajajo).
Moreover, new NoEs could be envisaged in duly justified cases. 
Poleg tega se lahko v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih predvidijo nove mreže odličnosti.
A distinction has to be made between the possible dimension of financial integration and the co-financing principle governing any FP6 project. 
Razlikovati je treba med mogočim obsegom finančnega povezovanja in načelom sofinanciranja, ki ureja kateri koli projekt 6.
There has been no requirement on IP participants to attract other sources of funding beyond their own co-financing share. 
Od udeležencev v integriranih projektih se ni zahtevalo, da morajo poleg lastnega deleža sofinanciranja privabiti še druge vire financiranja.
The Commission notes variable behaviour across the thematic areas of the Framework Programme in terms of attracting additional private and public funding. 
Komisija opozarja na različno ravnanje po tematskih področjih okvirnega programa v smislu privabljanja dodatnega zasebnega in javnega financiranja.
With regard to a continued funding of FP6 NoEs, the Commission reached a similar conclusion following the Report of the Expert Group on the future of Networks of Excellence. 
OP je na podlagi poročila strokovne skupine o prihodnosti mrež odličnosti (Report of the Expert Group on the future of Networks of Excel-lence) prišla do podobne ugotovitve. 58.
FP6 makes up a very small part (close to 5 %) of the overall funding provided for research in Europe and, hence, its scope for influence in a domain where Member States have the first role to play is by definition limited. 
OP obsega zelo majhen delež (približno 5 %) vsega financiranja, zagotovljenega za raziskave v Evropi, zato ima na področju, na katerem imajo države članice glavno vlogo, že po definiciji majhne možnosti vplivanja.
Yet the Commission believes that FP6 has provided a significant boost to research efforts. 
Komisija kljub temu meni, da je 6. OP bistveno spodbudil raziskovalna prizadevanja.
Recommendation No 3 The Commission is constantly examining the research landscape, monitors the national R & D policies and is actively engaged in the endeavours to further research investments through, not least, the open method of coordination. 
Priporočilo št. 3 Komisija nenehno proučuje raziskovalno področje, spremlja nacionalne raziskovalne in razvojne politike ter dejavno sodeluje pri prizadevanjih za nadaljnje spodbujanje naložb v raziskave, med drugim tudi prek odprte metode usklajevanja.
The Commission has actively sought to address any problems encountered, within the constraints imposed by the existing legislative framework. 
Komisija si je v okviru omejitev, določenih z veljavnim zakonodajnim okvirom, dejavno prizadevala za rešitev morebitnih težav.
The Commission notes that the large number of projects under the new instruments, which points to the involvement of thousands of participants in them, as well as the overall good results that were registered for them, shows that any shortcomings have not been important for the overall use of the IPs and the NoEs. 
Komisija opozarja, da veliko število projektov v okviru novih instrumentov, kar pomeni, da v njih sodeluje na tisoče udeležencev, in na splošno dobri rezultati, doseženi v zvezi z njimi, kažejo na to, da morebitne pomanjkljivosti na splošno niso vplivale na uporabo integriranih projektov in mrež odličnosti. Priporočilo št.
Recommendation No 4 The Commission agrees that clear and timely guidance, a speedier contracting process and better project monitoring are very important elements for the implementation of a European FP for research. 
4 Komisija se strinja, da so jasna in pravočasna navodila, hitrejši postopek oddaje naročil in boljše spremljanje projekta zelo pomembni dejavniki za izvajanje okvirnega programa Evropske skupnosti za raziskave.
The Commission carries out its obligations while it constantly has to balance between two goals that are difficult to reconcile, namely the speediness of disbursement of funds and the need to ensure their accountable distribution to contractors, all in the context of the current legislative environment. 
Komisija izvaja svoje obveznosti, pri tem pa mora nenehno uravnavati dva cilja, ki ju je težko uskladiti, in sicer hitrost izplačevanja sredstev in potrebo po zagotovitvi njihove odgovorne razdelitve izvajalcem, vse v okviru danega zakonodajnega okolja.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2009 — 41 pp. — 21 􏰋 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-408-1 doi:10.2865/63596 REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 43 Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
8/2009 „Mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje? Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2009 – 41 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978–92–9207–420-3 doi:10.2865/67415 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 43 Posebno poročilo št.
THE SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME WAS SET UP BY THE EU TO PROMOTE EUROPEAN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT DURING THE PERIOD FROM 2002 TO 2006. 
EU JE VZPOSTAVILA ŠESTI OKVIRNI PROGRAM ZA SPODBUJANJE EVROPSKIH RAZISKAV IN TEHNOLOŠKEGA RAZVOJA V OBDOBJU OD 2002 DO 2006 .
THE COURT ANALYSED THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE TWO MAIN INSTRUMENTS, ‘NETWORKS OF EXCELLENCE’ AND ‘INTEGRATED PROJECTS’, HAD EFFECTIVELY CONTRIBUTED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME. 
SODIŠČE JE ANALIZIRALO, V KOLIKŠNEM OBSEGU STA DVA GLAVNA INSTRUMENTA, „MREŽE ODLIČNOSTI“ IN „INTEGRIRANI PROJEKTI“, USPEŠNO PRISPEVALA K DOSEGANJU CILJEV PROGRAMA.
THE COURT CONCLUDED THAT THESE INSTRUMENTS CONTRIBUTED TO THE GENERAL OBJECTIVE OF PROMOTING EFFECTIVE RESEARCH COLLABORATION BUT THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES WERE ONLY PARTIALLY ACHIEVED. 
PRIŠLO JE DO ZAKLJUČKA, DA STA TA INSTRUMENTA PRISPEVALA K SPLOŠNEMU CILJU SPODBUJANJA USPEŠNEGA RAZISKOVALNEGA SODELOVANJA, VENDAR SO BILI NJUNI POSEBNI CILJI SAMO DELNO DOSEŽENI.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-09-010-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJ-AB-09-010-SL-C
special report no 11 2009 The susTainabiliTy and The Commission’s managemenT of The life-naTure projeCTs (pursuant to article 248(4), second subparagraph, eC) european CourT of audiTors 
11 2009 TrajnosT projekTov LIFe-narava In kako jIh upravLja komIsIja (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 248(4) es) evropsko raČunsko soDIŠČe
european CourT of audiTors 12, rue alcide de gasperi 1615 luxembourg luXembourg Tel.: +352 4398-45410 fax: +352 4398-46410 e-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu special report no 11 2009 a great deal of additional information on the european union is available on the internet. it can be accessed through the europa server (http://europa.eu). 
evropsko raČunsko soDIŠČe 12, rue alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LuksemBurG Tel. +352 4398-45410 Faks +352 4398-46410 e-naslov: euraud@eca.europa.eu spletni naslov: http://www.eca.europa.eu posebno poročilo št. 11 2009 veliko dodatnih informacij o evropski uniji je na voljo na internetu. Dostop je mogoč na strežniku europa (http://europa.eu). kataloški podatki so navedeni na koncu te publikacije.
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. luxembourg : publications office of the european union, 2009 isbn 978-92-9207-431-9 doi 10.2865/70702 © european Communities, 2009 reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: urad za uradne publikacije evropskih skupnosti, 2009 IsBn 978-92-9207-443-2 doi 10.2865/75050 © evropski skupnosti, 2009 reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
4 glossary birds directive: Council directive 79/409/eeC of 2 april 1979 on the conservation of wild birds eAfrd: european agricultural fund for rural development eeA: european environment agency ec: european Community/Communities eec: european economic Community eff: european fisheries fund erdf: european regional development fund eionet: european environment information and observation network etc: european Topic Centre on biological diversity eu: european union eunis: european nature information system habitats directive: Council directive 92/43/eeC of 21 may 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. input: financial, human and material resources that are mobilised for the implementation of an intervention. intervention: any action or operation, carried out by public authorities or other organisations, regardless of its nature (policy, programme, measure or project). 
4 GLosar direktiva o pticah: Direktiva sveta 79/409/eGs z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic eksrP: evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja eea: evropska agencija za okolje es: evropska skupnost/evropski skupnosti egs: evropska gospodarska skupnost esr: evropski sklad za ribištvo esrr: evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj eIOnet: evropsko okoljsko informacijsko in opazovalno omrežje etc: evropski tematski center za biotsko raznovrstnost eU: evropska unija eUnIs: evropski informacijski sistem o naravi direktiva o habitatih: Direktiva sveta 92/43/eGs z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst Vložek: Finančni, človeški in materialni viri, ki se aktivirajo za izvedbo posega Poseg: vsa dejanja ali dejavnosti, ki jih izvajajo javni organi ali druge organizacije, ne glede na njihov značaj (politika, program, ukrep ali projekt). lIFe: Finančni instrument za okolje (L'Instrument Financier pour l'Environment) lIFe III: LIFe za obdobje 2000–2006 lIFe+: LIFe za obdobje 2007–2013 lIFe-narava: Del instrumenta LIFe, ki prispeva k obnovitvi ali vzdrževanju ugodnega stanja ohranjenosti naravnih habitatov in/ali populacij vrst Ukrep: osnovna enota upravljanja programa v okviru določene politike, sestavljena iz vrste podobnih projektov in z natančno določenim proračunom. dč: Država članica natura 2000: evropsko ekološko omrežje posebnih ohranitvenih območij varstva Ul: Uradni list Evropske unije posebno poročilo št.
5 objective: initial statement of the outcomes intended to be achieved by an intervention. a distinction should be made between global, intermediate, immediate and operational objectives: - a global objective corresponds to the global impact of an intervention and is generally defined by Community legislation in very broad terms; it is usually translated by the Commission and member states into intermediate objectives which correspond to the expected intermediate impacts of programmes financed; - immediate objectives concern the results of an intervention on direct addressees and are normally defined by member states within the implementation of programmes financed; - operational objectives specify the outputs to be produced. outcome: Change that arises from the implementation of an intervention and which normally relates to the objectives of this intervention. outcomes include results and impacts. outcomes may be expected or unexpected, positive or negative. output: That which is produced or accomplished with the resources allocated to an intervention (e.g. X hectares of habitat y restored). 
11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija 5 cilj: uvodna izjava o izidih, ki naj bi se dosegli s posegom. razlikovati je treba med global-nimi, posrednimi, takojšnjimi in operativnimi cilji: - globalni cilj ustreza globalnemu učinku posega in je na splošno v zelo širokem pomenu opredeljen v zakonodaji skupnosti; komisija in države članice ga običajno razumejo kot posredni cilj, ki ustreza pričakovanim posrednim učinkom financiranih programov; - takojšnji cilji zadevajo rezultate posega, ki nastanejo za neposredne naslovnike, države članice pa jih običajno opredelijo pri izvedbi financiranih programov; - operativni cilji določajo izložke, ki jih je treba proizvesti.
Project: non-divisible operation, delimited in terms of schedule and budget, and placed under the responsibility of an organisation which implements, closest to the field, the resources allocated to the intervention. result: immediate changes that arise for direct addressees at the end of their participation in an intervention. sci: site of community importance sebi: streamlining european biodiversity indicators sPA: special protection area special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
Izložek: kar se proizvede ali doseže z viri, ki so dodeljeni posegu (npr. obnovljenih je X hektarjev habitata Y). OPs: območje, pomembno za skupnosti POV: posebno območje varstva Projekt: nedeljiva naloga, določena v smislu časovnega razporeda in proračuna, za katero je odgovorna organizacija, ki čim bliže kraju samem izvršuje posegu dodeljena sredstva rezultat: Takojšnje spremembe, ki nastanejo pri neposrednih naslovnikih ob koncu njihovega sodelovanja v posegu sebI: racionalizacija kazalnikov evropske biotske raznovrstnosti posebno poročilo št.
The supervision and management of life-nature is complex, as projects deal with different situations from one site to another across the union, are run by a great variety of beneficiaries and should have a sustained impact on the conservation of individual species and habitats, while adding value through dissemination of the results achieved (paragraphs 1 to 8). iii. since the first life instrument, introduced in 1992, the Commission has progressively developed and improved its management and control systems, inter alia taking into account the results of the Court’s previous audits1. further changes were introduced with the start of life+ applying to the 2007–2013 period (paragraphs 9 to 11). 
To s finančnega vidika predstavlja najpomembnejše evropsko financiranje, ki je posebej namenjeno okolju in ga komisija upravlja neposredno, saj je bistvenega pomena za cilje okoljske politike evropske unije. II. nadzor in upravljanje projektov LIFe-narava sta zapletena, ker se razmere pri projektih med različnimi območji po vsej uniji razlikujejo, projekte vodijo najrazličnejši upravičenci, projekti sami pa bi morali trajno učinkovati na ohranjanje posameznih vrst in habitatov ter hkrati zagotavljati dodano vrednost prek razširjanja doseženih rezultatov (odstavki 1 do 8).