natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
MAs also had to report cases of non-compliance with the legal durability requirements in their annual reports. 
Organi upravljanja so morali v svojih letnih poročilih poročati tudi o primerih neizpolnjevanja zakonodajnih zahtev glede trajnosti.
However, the Commission could not provide any evidence of what action it had taken to follow up on these non-compliance cases. 
Komisija ni mogla predložiti dokazov o tem, katere ukrepe je sprejela za naknadno spremljanje teh primerov neskladnosti.
The Commission had incorporated studies on ERDF financial support for large companies and SMEs into its wider ex-post evaluation of 2007-2013 Cohesion policy50. 
Komisija je študije o finančni podpori ESRR za velika podjetja in MSP vključila v svoje širše naknadno vrednotenje kohezijske politike v obdobju 2007–201350.
While the final reports did not entail direct assessments of the durability of results, they nonetheless contained findings relevant to the objective of attaining long-lasting results from the EU investments in businesses. 
Končna poročila sicer niso vsebovala neposrednih ocen trajnosti rezultatov, so pa kljub temu vsebovala ugotovitve, pomembne za cilj, da se z naložbami EU v podjetja dosežejo dolgoročni rezultati.
The most important evaluation findings concerning the two types of businesses were consistent with our audit results and are summarised in Annex VIII. 
Najpomembnejše ugotovitve vrednotenja v zvezi z obema vrstama podjetij so bile skladne z rezultati revizije Sodišča in so povzete v Prilogi VIII.
The Commission has not collected statistics on the survival rates of EU-funded businesses at both EU and national level. As a result, it is not yet able to conduct benchmarking between those that receive support and those that do not. 
Komisija ni zbirala statističnih podatkov o stopnji preživetja podjetij, ki jih financira EU, na ravni EU niti na nacionalni ravni, zato še ne more opraviti primerjalne analize med tistimi, ki prejemajo podporo, in tistimi, ki je ne.
Corrective measures taken in case of failure to achieve targets and comply with durability requirements were not applied consistently 79. 
Popravljalni ukrepi, sprejeti v primeru nedoseganja ciljev ali neizpolnjevanja zahtev glede trajnosti, so se izvajali nedosledno 79.
We looked at the way in which the MAs applied corrective measures for failing to achieve the targets set or comply with the durability requirements as this also may have an influence on the degree to which durable results were achieved. 
Sodišče je pregledalo, kako so organi upravljanja uporabljali popravljalne ukrepe v primeru nedoseganja zastavljenih ciljev ali neizpolnjevanja zahtev glede trajnosti, saj tudi to lahko vpliva na stopnjo doseganja trajnih rezultatov.
The MAs envisaged recoveries for failing to achieve the binding targets set in the grant agreement and failing to comply with the legal durability requirements. However, these measures were not applied in a uniform manner. 
Organi upravljanja so predvideli izterjave za nedoseganje zavezujočih ciljev, določenih v sporazumu o nepovratnih sredstvih, in za neizpolnjevanje zakonodajnih zahtev glede trajnosti, vendar se ti ukrepi niso uporabljali enotno.
The amount by which projects had to fall short of their targets for corrective measures to be applied varied, and the amounts recoverable also varied depending on the rules established in the OPs. 
Mera, s katero je bilo določeno, da projekt ni dosegel svojih ciljev in se bodo zato zanj uporabljali popravljalni ukrepi, se je razlikoval od primera do primera. Prav tako so se razlikovali izterljivi zneski, ki so bili odvisni od pravil, določenih v operativnih programih.
The Czech and Polish MAs were more flexible: they recovered funds only if the actual value achieved was less than 95 % (Czech Republic) or 90 % (Poland) of the binding targets set. 
Organa upravljanja Češke republike in Poljske sta bila prožnejša: sredstva sta izterjala le, če je dejanska dosežena vrednost znašala manj kot 95 % (Češka) ali 90 % (Poljska) določenih zavezujočih ciljev.
The Italian authorities, too, recovered funds from projects which had failed to achieve the target values. 
Tudi italijanski organi so izterjali sredstva od projektov, ki niso dosegli svojih ciljnih vrednosti.
However, the amounts to be recovered also differed significantly among the OPs. 
Zneski, ki jih je treba izterjati, pa so se močno razlikoval tudi po operativnih programih.
The German and Czech OPs applied a full recovery. For Italian OPs, however, the recovery was proportionate to the value of the assets and the length of time they had been disused. 
Pri nemških in čeških operativnih programih se je uporabljala izterjava v celoti, pri italijanskih pa je bila izterjava sorazmerna z vrednostjo sredstev in časom opustitve.
The Italian MA applied a full recovery only where the non-compliance in question represented a substantial breach of the legal durability requirement, in case of non-achievement of employment objectives or if businesses contributed less to project financing than provided for in grant agreements. 
Italijanski organ upravljanja je izterjavo v celoti uporabljal le, kadar je zadevno neizpolnjevanje pomenilo bistveno kršitev zakonodajne zahteve glede trajnosti, v primeru nedoseganja ciljev glede zaposlovanja ali če so podjetja k financiranju projektov prispevala manj, kot je določeno v sporazumih o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev.
Where this was the case, the MAs allowed them to be renegotiated before the end of the durability period, in light of the values likely to be achieved. 
V takih primerih so organi upravljanja omogočili ponovna pogajanja pred iztekom obdobja trajnosti, ob upoštevanju vrednosti, ki naj bi se verjetno dosegle.
While this was justifiable in certain cases, e.g. due to changing external factors, there is a risk that, if applied almost as a rule, this will render both the earlier selection of project applications for financing and attaining durable results doubtful. 
To je bilo sicer v nekaterih primerih, npr. zaradi spremenljivih zunanjih dejavnikov, upravičljivo, toda v primeru, da se uporablja skoraj praviloma, obstaja tveganje, da bosta tako prej opravljena izbira projektnih vlog za financiranje kot tudi dosega trajnih rezultatov vprašljivi.
In other cases (e.g. in the Czech regional OP), the grant agreements allowed the transfer of the subsidised assets to a third party before the end of the durability period, provided the MA had endorsed this transfer. 
V drugih primerih (npr. v okviru češkega regionalnega operativnega programa) so sporazumi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev omogočili prenos subvencioniranih sredstev tretji stranki pred koncem obdobja trajnosti, če je upravni organ ta prenos potrdil.
According to the MA, such transfers only occurred after a thorough assessment of the firm to which the subsidised assets were transferred. 
Po navedbah organa upravljanja so bili tovrstni prenosi izvršeni samo po temeljiti oceni podjetja, na katero naj bi bila subvencionirana sredstva prenesena.
Saxony did, however, provide for the possibility of waiving recovery and termination in specifically justified cases. 40 51 
41 51 Saška je predvidela možnost opustitve izterjave in prekinitve v posebej utemeljenih primerih.
Some improvements were made in the 2014-2020 ESIF regulations to increase the potential for durability of results 85. 
V uredbah o skladih ESI za obdobje 2014–2020 so bile uvedene nekatere izboljšave za povečanje možnosti za trajnost rezultatov 85.
We assessed to what extent the Commission had used lessons learnt from previous programmes in its 2014-2020 ESIF legislative proposals and if it had identified technical and organisational constraints on the durability of results in business sector projects, as well as examples of good practice, from before 2014. 
Sodišče je ocenilo, v kolikšni meri je Komisija izkušnje, pridobljene v okviru prejšnjih programov, uporabila v svojih zakonodajnih predlogih o skladih ESI za obdobje 2014–2020 ter ali je opredelila tehnične in organizacijske omejitve v zvezi s trajnostjo rezultatov projektov v poslovnem sektorju, pa tudi primere dobre prakse iz obdobja pred letom 2014.
We checked whether the changes in relation to improved durability of EU investments had been reflected in policy documents and in the legal framework for this support sector. 
Preverilo je, ali se spremembe, povezane z izboljšano trajnostjo naložb EU, odražajo v dokumentih politike in v pravnem okviru za ta sektor podpore.
The regulatory framework has improved ... 
Regulativni okvir se je izboljšal ...
The Commission, in designing the 2014-2020 ESIF legislative proposals, used the lessons learnt from previous productive investment programmes. 
Komisija je pri oblikovanju zakonodajnih predlogov o skladih ESI za obdobje 2014–2020 uporabila izkušnje iz preteklih programov produktivnih naložb.
A number of essential modifications were inserted in the ESIF regulations. 
V uredbe o skladih ESI so bile vključene številne bistvene spremembe.
The following provisions in the ERDF Regulation and in the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR)52 have clarified the regulatory framework in terms of the durability of ESIF-financed operations and are likely to have an impact on enhancing the durability of results: • Since 2014, the ERDF has, in principle, supported productive investments for SMEs only. 
Naslednje določbe v uredbi o ESRR in uredbi o skupnih določbah52 so razjasnile regulativni okvir v smislu trajnosti operacij, ki jih financirajo skladi ESI, in bodo verjetno imele učinek na izboljšanje trajnosti rezultatov: • ESRR od leta 2014 načeloma podpira le produktivne naložbe za MSP.
SMEs are generally assumed to have greater need of funds and other support, such as business advisory services. 
Na splošno se predpostavlja, da imajo MSP večje potrebe po sredstvih in drugi podpori, kot so svetovalne storitve za podjetja.
Large enterprises may receive grants only for investments in strengthening research, technological development and innovation, or to support the shift towards a low-carbon economy53. 
Velika podjetja lahko prejmejo nepovratna sredstva le za naložbe v krepitev raziskav, tehnološkega razvoja in inovacij ali za podporo prehodu na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo53, • razjasnjeno je bilo, kdaj se začne petletno obdobje trajnosti.
Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
1301/2013 in Uredba (EU) št.
Article 3(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013. 
Člen 3(1)(a) in (b) Uredbe (EU) št.
It is now either the final payment date or, where relevant, the date set in the State aid decision, which was not clear and therefore not applied in a uniform manner by the MAs previously. • As regards corrective measures for failing to comply with the legal durability requirements, only one of the following three conditions now needs to apply (rather than all three, as was previously the case) in order to trigger a recovery: (a) a cessation or relocation of a productive activity outside the programme area; (b) a change in ownership of an item of infrastructure which gives a firm an undue advantage; or (c) a substantial change affecting its nature, objectives or implementation conditions which would undermine its original objectives. • The ESIF contribution is to be repaid if the productive investment is relocated outside the EU within 10 years (instead of 5 years) of the final payment, except where the beneficiary is an SME54. 
• v zvezi s popravljalnimi ukrepi za neizpolnjevanje zakonodajnih zahtev glede trajnosti mora biti zdaj izpolnjen samo eden od naslednjih treh pogojev (namesto vseh treh, kot je veljalo doslej), da se sproži izterjava, in sicer: (a) prenehanje ali premestitev proizvodne dejavnosti iz programskega območja, (b) sprememba lastništva postavke infrastrukture, ki daje podjetju neupravičeno prednost, ali (c) bistvena sprememba, ki vpliva na značaj, cilje ali pogoje izvajanja, zaradi česar bi se razvrednotili njeni prvotni cilji, • prispevek skladov ESI je treba vrniti, če se produktivna naložba v 10 letih (in ne v 5 letih) po končnem plačilu preseli zunaj EU, razen kadar je upravičenec MSP.54 87. V nedavni reviziji Sodišča55 je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile Komisija in države članice večinoma uspešne pri pripravi operativnih programov s trdnejšo intervencijsko logiko.
A recent audit by us55 found that the Commission and Member States had generally been successful in developing OPs with a more robust intervention logic, i.e. setting out the aims (specific objectives/results) and how these are expected to be achieved (required funding, actions to be undertaken and expected outputs). 
Določile so namreč, kakšen je namen intervencije (posebni cilji/rezultati) in kako naj bi ga dosegle (potrebno financiranje, ukrepi, ki jih je treba izvesti, in pričakovani izložki).
New rules have been introduced with the aim of using performance indicators more consistently and comprehensively to measure progress towards long-term results. 
Uvedena so bila nova pravila, da bi se kazalniki smotrnosti uporabljali bolj dosledno in celovito za merjenje napredka pri dosegi dolgoročnih rezultatov.
For each priority axis, the OPs (except for technical assistance axes and OPs dedicated to the SME initiative) must specify a performance framework constituted by a subset of indicators laid down in the OPs56, most of them being already pre-defined in the related regulation. 
V operativnih programih mora biti za vsako prednostno os (razen za osi tehnične pomoči in operativne programe, namenjene pobudi za mala in srednja podjetja) določen okvir smotrnosti, ki ga sestavlja podsklop kazalnikov, določenih v operativnih programih56, večinoma pa že vnaprej določenih v zadevni uredbi. ... toda vrzeli še vedno obstajajo 88.
Article 71 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
To so pogoji, ki temeljijo Člen 71 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
Special Report No 2/2017: ‘The Commission’s negotiation of 2014-2020 Partnership Agreements and programmes in Cohesion’. 
Posebno poročilo št. 2/2017 – Pogajanja Komisije o partnerskih sporazumih in programih na področju kohezije za obdobje 2014–2020.
42 54 55 56 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, Articles 22 and 96, and Annex II. 
Člena 22 in 96 Uredbe (EU) št.
These are conditions, based on pre-defined criteria established in the CPR, which are necessary prerequisites for the effective and efficient use of EU funding for all ESI funds. 
na merilih, vnaprej določenih v uredbi o skupnih določbah, ter so nujni osnovni pogoji za uspešno in učinkovito porabo sredstev EU za vse sklade ESI.
When preparing the OPs for the 2014-2020 period, the Member States had to assess whether these conditions were fulfilled. 
Pri pripravi operativnih programov za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 so morale države članice oceniti, ali so ti pogoji izpolnjeni.
In order to fulfil the requirements related to ex-ante conditionality 3, which deals with enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs, the national authorities had to undertake specific action to promote entrepreneurship, including under the Small Business Act for Europe58, prior to being allocated ESI funds to support businesses. 
Za izpolnitev zahteve glede predhodne pogojenosti št. 3, ki se nanaša na izboljšanje konkurenčnosti MSP, so morali nacionalni organi izvesti posebne dejavnosti za spodbujanje podjetništva, tudi v okviru Akta za mala podjetja za Evropo58, preden so jim bila dodeljena sredstva skladov ESI za podporo podjetjem.
Some of these activities are meant to have a positive effect on the organisation of entrepreneurship and, subsequently, on the life expectancy of businesses and their long-term results. 
Nekatere od teh dejavnosti naj bi imele pozitiven učinek na organizacijo podjetništva ter posledično na pričakovano življenjsko dobo podjetij in njihove dolgoročne rezultate.
However, given that, at the time of the audit, only three years had passed since the beginning of the programme period, their direct impact on the durability of results could not yet be demonstrated59. 
Vendar pa glede na to, da so v času revizije pretekla le tri leta od začetka programskega obdobja, neposrednega učinka teh dejavnosti na trajnost rezultatov še ni bilo mogoče dokazati59.
However, a proposal by the Commission for an additional ex-ante condition on the implementation of the late payment directive60, which could have had an important impact on the survival rates of SMEs, was not accepted by the legislative authorities. 
Vendar zakonodajni organi niso sprejeli predloga Komisije za dodatno predhodno pogojenost o izvajanju direktive o zamudah pri plačilih60, ki bi lahko imel pomemben učinek na stopnje preživetja MSP.
The OPs for the 2014-2020 period are structured in a way which has resulted in a significant increase in the number of performance indicators for outputs and results that See Article 17 and annex XI of Regulation No 1303/2013 as well as Special Report No 2/2017. 
Način strukturiranja operativnih programov za obdobje 2014–2020 je povzročil znatno povečanje števila kazalnikov smotrnosti za izložke in rezultate, ki jih je treba spremljati. Sodišče je v Posebnem poročilu št.
Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - “Think Small First” - A “Small Business Act” for Europe {SEC(2008) 2101} {SEC(2008) 2102} /* COM/2008/0394 final */ of 25 June 2008. 
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – „Najprej pomisli na male” – „Akt za mala podjetja” za Evropo {SEC(2008) 2101} {SEC(2008) 2102} /* COM/2008/0394 final */ z dne 25. junija 2008.
See also Commission Staff Working Document SWD (2017) 127 final of 31.3.2017, ‘The Value added of Ex-ante conditionalities in the European Structural and Investment Funds’. 
Glej tudi delovni dokument služb Komisije SWD(2017) 127 final z dne 31. marca 2017 o dodani vrednosti predhodnih pogojenosti v evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladih.
43 57 58 59 60 Directive 2011/7/EU. 
Direktiva 2011/7/EU.
In addition, another ECA report62 states that “the vast majority of indicators constitutes the basis for allocating the performance reserve related to output (57 %), financial indicators (33 %) and key implementation steps (9 %)”. 
Poleg tega je v drugem poročilu Sodišča62 navedeno, da se „[v]elika večina kazalnikov, ki so podlaga za dodeljevanje rezerve za smotrnost, [...] nanaša na izložke (57 %), finančne kazalnike (33 %) in ključne faze izvajanja (9 %)“.
When drafting the new regulatory framework, the Commission was unable to use the results from the 2007-2013 ex-post evaluations of ERDF support to businesses (both large and SMEs) as the reports were published only in early 2016. 
Komisija pri pripravi novega regulativnega okvira ni mogla uporabiti rezultatov naknadnih vrednotenj podpore ESRR za podjetja (velika in tudi MSP) v obdobju 2007–2013, ker so bila poročila objavljena šele na začetku leta 2016.
Except for a study by the European Parliament63, which largely focused on legal aspects, we have not been aware of other significant sources (for instance studies or other assessments by the national authorities) that deal with ERDF support for productive investment and were used for the design of the new ESIF regulations. 
Razen študije, ki jo je opravil Evropski parlament63 in je bila večinoma osredotočena na pravne vidike, Sodišče ne pozna nobenih bistvenih virov (na primer študij ali drugih ocen, ki bi jih pripravili nacionalni organi), ki obravnavajo podporo ESRR za produktivne naložbe in so se uporabljali pri zasnovi novih uredb o skladih ESI.
Overall, therefore the regulations for the 2014-2020 programming period were cast without sufficient information derived from evaluation studies. 
Na splošno so se zato uredbe za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 pripravljale brez zadostnih informacij, pridobljenih iz ocenjevalnih študij.
The Commission has not introduced any other specific measures to promote durability in ESIF productive investment projects in the regions. 
Komisija ni uvedla nobenih drugih posebnih ukrepov za spodbujanje trajnosti projektov produktivnih naložb iz skladov ESI v regijah.
The new legal framework still does not include provisions requiring the MAs to establish monitoring procedures which specifically allow the collection of robust data on durability. 
Novi pravni okvir še vedno ne vključuje določb, na podlagi katerih bi morali organi upravljanja vzpostaviti postopke spremljanja, ki izrecno omogočajo zbiranje zanesljivih podatkov o trajnosti.
Moreover, it has not given MAs or beneficiaries any relevant guidance in this respect for the new programme period. 
Poleg tega organom upravljanja ali upravičencem ne zagotavlja ustreznih navodil za novo programsko obdobje.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 95. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 95.
Overall, we conclude that, even though a majority of the projects audited generated durable results, between 2000 and 2013 there was not enough emphasis on the durability of results in the management of the ERDF support to productive investments in European businesses. 
Sodišče na splošno ugotavlja, da je večina revidiranih projektov sicer ustvarila trajnostne rezultate, vendar pa pri upravljanju podpore ESRR za produktivne naložbe v evropska podjetja med letoma 2000 in 2013 ni bilo dovolj poudarka na trajnosti rezultatov.
As a consequence, for one fifth of the projects audited, the results were not durable. 
Posledično pri petini revidiranih projektov rezultati niso bili trajni.
We found shortcomings in the programming of the OPs and at the selection, monitoring and evaluation stages of the projects audited. 
pri načrtovanju operativnih programov ter pri izbiri, spremljanju in vrednotenju revidiranih projektov.
The EU legal durability requirements, in particular the beneficiaries’ obligation to maintain purchased assets in their original locations until the end of fixed durability periods of five/three years, were met for all the projects audited. 
Zakonodajne zahteve EU glede trajnosti, zlasti obveznost upravičencev, da kupljena sredstva do konca 5-/3-letnega obdobja trajnosti obdržijo na njihovi prvotni lokaciji, so bile izpolnjene za vse revidirane projekte.
The beneficiary companies had not undergone any substantial modifications or changes in the nature of their ownership, or ceased or relocated their economic activity. 
Upravičene družbe niso bistveno prilagodile ali spremenile narave svojega lastništva niti niso prenehale izvajati svojih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali jih preselile.
The outputs were mostly used until the end of the durability period (see paragraphs 20 to 23). 
Ti so se večinoma uporabljali do konca obdobja trajnosti (glej odstavke 20 do 23).
Direct results for the projects audited mostly related to job creation, improved access to finance and loans, increased production and productivity. 
Neposredni rezultati revidiranih projektov so se večinoma nanašali na ustvarjanje delovnih mest, boljši dostop do financiranja in posojil, večjo proizvodnjo in produktivnost.
At the time of our audit, most of the projects audited were still generating the expected direct results. 
V času revizije je večina revidiranih projektov še vedno ustvarjala pričakovane neposredne rezultate.
However, for nearly half of the projects audited, we noted that a comprehensive assessment of durability at the end of the durability period was not feasible. 
Kljub temu je Sodišče za skoraj polovico revidiranih projektov ugotovilo, da celovita ocena trajnosti na koncu obdobja trajnosti ni bila izvedljiva.
As most MAs focused solely on job creation, and the results were not monitored and reported adequately after project completion, relevant information on the extent to which they had been achieved and on their durability was scarce (see paragraphs 26 to 31). 
Ker se je večina organov upravljanja osredotočala zgolj na ustvarjanje delovnih mest ter ker se rezultati po zaključku projektov niso ustrezno spremljali in se o njih ni ustrezno poročalo, so bile zadevne informacije o tem, v kakšnem obsegu so bili doseženi, in o njihovi trajnosti skope (glej odstavke 26 do 31).