natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 35 The nature and pattern of errors varies significantly between EAGF and the other spending areas under natural resources. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 35 Vrsta in vzorec napak se med EKJS in drugimi področji porabe v okviru naravnih virov močno razlikujeta.
Agriculture — market and direct support (EAGF) Many of the errors identified in our audits are the result of inaccurate or ineligible claims by beneficiaries, with the most frequent being the over-declaration of agricultural land surface or ineligible parcels of land (see examples). 
Kmetijstvo – tržna in neposredna podpora (EKJS) Veliko napak, ki jih je Sodišče ugotovilo med revizijami, je posledica netočnih ali neupravičenih zahtevkov upravičencev, med katerimi so najpogostejše prijave prevelike površine kmetijskih zemljišč ali neupravičenih parcel (glej primere).
Having a reliable and up-to-date Land Parcel Identification System database (LPIS) can help to reduce such errors. 
Zanesljiva in posodobljena podatkovna zbirka identifikacijskega sistema za zemljišča (LPIS) lahko pomaga zmanjšati take napake.
Examples of overstated or ineligible claims Aid for permanent pasture In the Czech Republic, France, Greece, Poland, Slovakia and Spain, some land claimed and paid for as permanent grassland was in reality fully or partly covered with ineligible vegetation (dense shrubs, bushes, trees and rock). 
Primeri zahtevkov s previsoko navedenimi ali neupravičenimi zemljišči Pomoč za trajne pašnike Na Češkem, v Franciji, Grčiji, na Poljskem, Slovaškem in v Španiji je bil del zemljišč, ki so bila prijavljena kot trajni pašniki in za katera je bila izplačana pomoč, v resnici pokrita z neupravičenim rastlinjem (gosto grmi-čevje, grmovje, drevesa in kamenje).
Aid for arable land In the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Spain and the United Kingdom, we found cases of land claimed by beneficiary farmers as arable when this was not the case. 
Pomoč za orna zemljišča Sodišče je na Češkem, Danskem, Finskem, v Franciji, Nemčiji, Italiji, na Poljskem, Slovaškem, v Španiji in Združenem kraljestvu ugotovilo primere, v katerih so kmetje upravičenci površine prijavili kot orne, čeprav niso bile.
In Spain, aid was paid for land claimed and recorded in the land parcel identification system as arable land which was, in reality, a motocross track. 
V Španiji je bila pomoč plačana za parcelo, ki je bila v LPIS prijavljena in evidentirana kot orno zemljišče, v resnici pa je bila proga za motokros.
In several cases of quantifiable errors made by final beneficiaries, national authorities had sufficient information to prevent, or detect and correct the errors before declaring the expenditure to the Commission. 
V več primerih količinsko opredeljivih napak, ki so jih naredili končni upravičenci, so imeli nacionalni organi dovolj informacij, da bi napake lahko preprečili ali odkrili in popravili, preden so bili odhodki prijavljeni Komisiji.
If all the information had been used to correct errors, the estimated level of error would have been 0.6 percentage points lower. 
Če bi vse te informacije uporabili za popravo napak, bi bila ocenjena stopnja napake za 0,6 odstotne točke nižja.
In addition, we detected a considerable number of cases of errors made by the national authorities. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče odkrilo večje število primerov napak nacionalnih organov.
These contributed 0.7 percentage points to the estimated level of error. 
Te napake so k ocenjeni stopnji napake prispevale 0,7 odstotne točke.
Beneficiaries of EAGF direct support and of EARDF area-related support have a legal obligation to fulfil cross-compliance requirements. 
Upravičenci do neposredne podpore EKJS in na površino vezane podpore EKSRP so po zakonu dolžni izpolnjevati zahteve navzkrižne skladnosti.
These requirements relate to the protection of the environment, public health, animal and plant health, animal welfare and to the maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition. 
Te zahteve se nanašajo na varstvo okolja, javno zdravje, zdravje živali in rastlin, dobro počutje živali ter ohranjanje dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev kmetijskih zemljišč.
If farmers do not comply with these obligations their aid is reduced. 
Če kmetje ne ravnajo v skladu s temi obveznostmi, se njihov znesek pomoči zniža.
In our testing, we found infringements in 27 % of the transactions subject to cross-compliance obligations. 
Sodišče je pri preizkušanju transakcij, za katere velja obveznost navzkrižne skladnosti, pri 27 % transakcij odkrilo kršitve.
The cross-compliance errors had an impact of 0.7 percentage points on the estimated level of error. 
Učinek napak v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo na ocenjeno stopnjo napake je bil 0,7 odstotne točke.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 36 The integrated administration and control system (IACS) is the main management and control system for ensuring the regularity of EAGF payments. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 36 Integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem (IAKS) je glavni upravljavski in kontrolni sistem za zagotavljanje pravilnosti plačil EKJS.
For 2014, we examined the operation of IACS in Croatia and identified only minor deficiencies that do not affect the reliability of the system. 
Sodišče je za leto 2014 preučilo operacije IAKS na Hrvaškem in ugotovilo le manjše pomanjkljivosti, ki ne vplivajo na zanesljivost sistema.
We additionally carried out desk reviews of 14 conformity audits carried out by the Commission on systems in Member States and found the work done to be satisfactory. 
Poleg tega je izvedlo pregled dokumentacije 14 revizij skladnosti v zvezi s sistemi držav članic, ki jih je opravila Komisija, in ugotovilo, da je bilo opravljeno delo zadovoljivo.
Remedial action has also been taken on IACS weaknesses that we reported in previous years. 
Popravljalni ukrepi so bili izvedeni tudi v zvezi s slabostmi IAKS, o katerih smo poročali v prejšnjih letih.
However, this was not always done promptly and, in several instances, weaknesses continue to persist, although to a lesser degree. 
Toda popravljalni ukrepi niso bili vedno takoj sprejeti in v več primerih slabosti še vedno obstajajo, čeprav manjše.
The payments under market measures represent around 6 % of the EAGF. However, they contribute disproportionately to a larger share of the overall estimated level of error for the Fund. 
Plačila v okviru tržnih ukrepov pomenijo približno 6 % plačil EKJS, vendar prispevajo nesorazmerno večji delež k skupni ocenjeni stopnji napake za ta sklad.
We also completed our examination of the reinforcement of assurance procedure that is applicable on a voluntary basis in six Member States or regions. 
Sodišče je zaključilo tudi preučitev okrepitev postopka dajanja zagotovila, ki se prostovoljno uporablja v šestih državah članicah ali regijah.
In these Member States or regions, an independent audit body provides an opinion on the proper functioning of systems and the regularity of expenditure declared to the EU. 
V teh državah članicah ali regijah neodvisni revizijski organ da mnenje o pravilnem delovanju sistemov ter pravilnosti odhodkov, prijavljenih EU.
With the exception of one Member State, the weaknesses in the implementation of this procedure make the levels of error they report unreliable. 
Razen v eni državi članici so stopnje napake, o katerih poročajo, nezanesljive zaradi slabosti pri izvajanju tega postopka.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 37 Rural development, environment, climate action and fisheries We found errors in all 18 Member States which we audited. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 37 Razvoj podeželja, okolje, podnebni ukrepi in ribištvo Sodišče je ugotovilo napake v vseh 18 revidiranih državah članicah.
The main reasons for errors in this spending area were ineligibility of the beneficiary, activity, project and/or expenditure, or non-compliance with agri-environment commitments to use agricultural production methods compatible with protection of the environment, landscape and natural resources. 
Glavni razlogi za napake na tem področju porabe so bili neupravičenost upravičencev, dejavnosti, projektov in/ali odhodkov ali neizpolnjevanje kmetijsko-okoljskih zavez za uporabo metod kmetijske proizvodnje, skladnih z varstvom okolja, krajine in naravnih virov.
Examples of eligibility errors We found three cases of suspected intentional circumvention of the rules when claiming for aid. 
Primeri napak v zvezi z upravičenostjo Sodišče je ugotovilo tri primere domnevnega namernega zaobhajanja pravil pri zahtevkih za pomoč.
These cases were forwarded to the European Anti-Fraud Office for analysis and possible investigation. 
Te primere je posredovalo Evropskemu uradu za boj proti goljufijam za analizo in morebitno preiskavo.
For confidentiality reasons, we cannot disclose specific details of these cases but can describe the general nature of these errors: ο Well-established companies, which would not qualify for financing, set up new entities to artificially meet the eligibility and selection criteria. ο Groups of persons set up several entities for the purpose of obtaining aid which exceed the ceiling allowed under the conditions of the investment measure. 
Zaradi zaupnosti Sodišče posebnih podrobnosti o njih ne sme razkriti, opiše pa lahko splošne značilnosti teh napak: ο dobro uveljavljene družbe, ki ne bi bile upravičene do financiranja, so ustanovile nove subjekte, tako da so formalno izpolnjevale merila za upravičenost in izbirna merila, ο skupine oseb so ustanovile več subjektov z namenom pridobitve pomoči nad dovoljeno zgornjo mejo, ki spada med pogoje naložbenega ukrepa.
Although the beneficiaries declared that these entities operate independently, this was not the case in practice. 
Čeprav so upravičenci izjavili, da ti subjekti delujejo neodvisno, to v praksi ni držalo.
Examples of non‐compliance with agri‐environment commitments We detected six such cases in Germany, Italy and United Kingdom. 
Primeri neizpolnjevanja kmetijsko‐okoljskih zavez Sodišče je odkrilo šest takih primerov v Nemčiji, Italiji in Združenem kraljestvu.
For example, in the United Kingdom, a beneficiary did not respect the commitment he made to close off a hay meadow for grazing before 15 May of each year. 
Upravičenec v Združenem kraljestvu na primer ni upošteval zaveze, da bo vsako leto pred 15. majem ogradil travnik za pašnjo.
In some cases of quantifiable errors made by final beneficiaries, national authorities had sufficient information to prevent, or detect and correct the errors before declaring the expenditure to the Commission. 
V nekaterih primerih količinsko opredeljivih napak, ki so jih naredili končni upravičenci, so imeli nacionalni organi dovolj informacij, da bi napake lahko preprečili ali odkrili in popravili, preden so bili odhodki prijavljeni Komisiji.
If all information had been used to correct errors, the estimated level of error for this spending area would have been 3.3 percentage points lower. 
Če bi vse te informacije uporabili za popravo napak, bi bila ocenjena stopnja napake za to področje porabe za 3,3 odstotne točke nižja.
In addition, we detected a few cases of errors made by the national authorities. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče odkrilo nekaj primerov napak nacionalnih organov.
These contributed 0.6 percentage points to the estimated level of error. 
Te napake so k ocenjeni stopnji napake prispevale 0,6 odstotne točke.
We found significant weaknesses in nine of the 12 reviewed systems of Member States. 
Sodišče je v devetih od 12 pregledanih sistemov držav članic ugotovilo bistvene slabosti.
For the five paying agencies that we visited on the spot, the system weaknesses that we found were very similar to those identified and reported in previous years. 
Za pet plačilnih agencij, ki jih je Sodišče obiskalo na kraju samem, je ugotovilo zelo podobne sistemske slabosti, kot jih je odkrilo in o njih poročalo v prejšnjih letih.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 38 For 2014, based on a pilot exercise that we undertook on some project performance issues, we found that for 93 % of the completed rural development projects we examined, the investment had been carried out as planned. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 38 Za leto 2014 je Sodišče na podlagi pilotnega projekta v zvezi z nekaterimi vprašanji, povezanimi s smotrnostjo projektov, ugotovilo, da je bila naložba pri 93 % preučenih zaključenih projektih za razvoj podeželja, izvedena v skladu z načrtom.
However, the targeting of the support and the selection of the projects were not as rigorous as could be expected. 
Toda usmerjanje podpore in izbira projektov nista bila tako stroga, kot bi se lahko pričakovalo.
We additionally observed that there was insufficient evidence that costs were reasonable. 
Sodišče je poleg tega ugotovilo, da ni bilo dovolj dokazov o razumnosti stroškov.
In the case of fisheries, we assessed the effectiveness of the checks done by the audit authority in Italy and found that while the methodology for audits of operations and systems was effective, there were weaknesses in the management and documentation of audit tasks and in the verification of eligibility conditions. 
Na področju ribištva je Sodišče ocenilo uspešnost pregledov, ki jih je izvedel revizijski organ v Italiji, in ugotovilo, da je metodologija za revizije operacij in sistemov sicer uspešna, vendar obstajajo slabosti pri upravljanju in dokumentiranju revizijskih nalog ter pri preverjanju pogojev za upravičenost.
What we recommend We recommend that: ο for EAGF, Member States make further efforts to include reliable and updated information in their LPIS database and to use all the information available to avoid payments for ineligible land; ο for rural development, the Commission takes the appropriate measures to strengthen the Member States’ action plans addressing frequent causes of error, and to revise the strategy for its rural development conformity audits; ο for both the EAGF and rural development, the Commission ensures that the new assurance procedure which will become mandatory from 2015 is correctly applied and reliable; and ο in the area of fisheries, the Commission ensures that Member States carry out their tasks more thoroughly, notably through required on-the-spot controls, applying quality control procedures and improving audit documentation. Want to know more? 
Kaj Sodišče priporoča Sodišče priporoča: ο za EKJS: naj si države članice še naprej prizadevajo za to, da v svoje podatkovne zbirke LPIS vključujejo zanesljive in posodobljene informacije ter uporabljajo vse informacije, ki so na voljo, in se tako izognejo plačilom za neupravičena zemljišča, ο za razvoj podeželja: naj Komisija sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za okrepitev akcijskih načrtov držav članic, ki obravnavajo pogosto ugotovljene vzroke za napake, in pregleda strategijo za svoje revizije skladnosti na področju razvoja podeželja, ο za EKJS in tudi za razvoj podeželja: naj Komisija zagotovi, da se bo novi postopek zagotovila, ki bo od proračunskega leto 2015 postal obvezen, pravilno uporabljal in da bo zanesljiv, ter ο na področju ribištva: naj Komisija zagotovi, da države članice izvajajo svoje naloge temeljiteje, zlasti z opravljanjem potrebnih kontrol na kraju samem, uporabo postopkov za kontrolo kakovosti in izboljšanjem revizijske dokumentacije. Želite izvedeti več?
Full information on our audit of EU expenditure on natural resources can be found in Chapter 7 of the 2014 annual report on the EU budget. 
Vse informacije o naši reviziji odhodkov EU za naravne vire so v poglavju 7 letnega poročila o proračunu EU za leto 2014.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 39 Global Europe €7.4 billion What we audited This spending area covers expenditure in the fields of foreign policy, support to EU candidate and potential candidate countries, as well as development assistance and humanitarian aid to developing and neighbouring countries (with the exception of the European Development Funds). 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 39 Evropa v svetu 7,4 milijarde EUR Kaj je Sodišče revidiralo To področje porabe obsega odhodke na področju zunanje politike, podporo državam kandidatkam in potencialnim kandidatkam za vstop v EU ter razvojno in humanitarno pomoč državam v razvoju in sosednjim državam (vendar ne evropskih razvojnih skladov).
Expenditure is dispersed throughout more than 150 countries, using a broad range of cooperation instruments and delivery methods. 
Za odhodke, ki se izplačujejo v več kot 150 držav, se uporablja veliko različnih instrumentov sodelovanja in načinov izvajanja.
Spending is implemented directly by Commission directorates-general, either from their headquarters in Brussels, by EU delegations in recipient countries, or jointly with international organisations. 
Porabo neposredno izvajajo generalni direktorati Komisije s svojega sedeža v Bruslju ali po delegacijah EU v državah prejemnicah ali pa generalni direktorati Komisije skupaj z mednarodnimi organizacijami.
What we found 1 Equivalent estimated levels of error for 2013 to reflect the new MFF headings. 
Da 2,7 % (leta 2013: 2,1 %) 1 Ekvivalentna ocenjena stopnja napake za leto 2013, ki odraža nove razdelke večletnega finančnega okvira.
The majority of errors we identified from our audits involve ineligible expenditure claimed by final beneficiaries, particularly expenditure incurred outside the eligibility period, inclusion of ineligible taxes, non-compliance with the rule of origin, and indirect costs wrongly charged as direct costs. 
Večina napak, ki jih je Sodišče ugotovilo med svojimi revizijami, se nanaša na neupravičene odhodke, ki so jih prijavili upravičenci, zlasti odhodke, ki so nastali zunaj obdobja upravičenosti, vključitev neupravičenih davkov, neupoštevanje pravila o poreklu in posredne stroške, napačno zaračunane kot neposredne stroške.
We also found cases of beneficiaries claiming costs without supporting documentation to justify the expenditure, instances of non-compliance with procurement rules, as well as errors in calculation. 
Ugotovilo je tudi primere upravičencev, ki so prijavili stroške brez dokazil za utemeljitev odhodkov, primere neupoštevanja pravil javnega naročanja ter napake v izračunih.
Other errors we found related to the acceptance and clearance of payment by the Commission for services, works or supplies that had not yet been incurred by the beneficiary. 
Druge ugotovljene napake so se nanašale na to, da je Komisija sprejela in obračunala odhodke za storitve, delo in blago, ki jih upravičenec še ni imel.
Estimated level of error1: Yes 2.7 % (2013: 2.1 %) Example: Expenditure not incurred The Commission concluded a €6.5 million contribution agreement with a Caribbean bank for the establishment of a revolving credit facility for sugar cane replanting in Belize. 
Primer: Odhodki, ki niso nastali Komisija je podpisala sporazum o prispevku s karibsko banko za znesek v višini 6,5 milijona EUR za ustanovitev instrumenta za obnavljajoče se kredite za ponovno zasaditev sladkornega trsa v Belizeju.
In 2014, the Commission accepted expenditure amounting to €2.3 million, of which €740 000 represented loans to farmers which had been approved by the bank but had not been paid out at the time. 
Leta 2014 je sprejela odhodke v višini 2,3 milijona EUR, od česar se je 740 000 EUR nanašalo na posojilne pogodbe s kmeti, ki jih je banka odobrila, vendar jih takrat še ni izplačala.
They led to the Commission clearing a higher amount of pre-financing than was justified. 
Zato je Komisija obračunala višji znesek predfinanciranja, kot je bilo upravičeno.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 40 The testing of transactions of EuropeAid, one of the directorates-general of the Commission managing a significant part of the Global Europe spending, revealed, in some cases, a failure to detect errors. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 40 Pri preizkušanju transakcij EuropeAid, enega od generalnih direktoratov Komisije, ki upravlja bistven del porabe na področju Evropa v svetu, se je pokazalo, da napake niso bile vedno odkrite.
The shortcomings in these checks, carried out ex ante by auditors appointed by the beneficiaries, led to the reimbursement by the Commission of ineligible costs. 
Zaradi pomanjkljivosti v pregledih, ki so jih izvedli revizorji, ki jih izberejo upravičenci, je Komisija povrnila neupravičene stroške.
What we recommend We recommend that the Commission: ο sets up and implements internal control procedures to ensure that pre-financing payments are cleared on the basis of actual incurred expenditure; and ο strengthens the ex ante controls for grant contracts, including the use of risk-based planning and systematic follow-up and on-the-spot visits. 
Kaj Sodišče priporoča Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija: ο vzpostavi in izvaja postopke notranje kontrole, da se zagotovi obračunavanje plačil predfinanciranja na podlagi dejansko nastalih odhodkov, ter ο okrepi predhodne kontrole pogodb o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev, vključno z uporabo načrtovanja na podlagi tveganja ter sistematičnega spremljanja izvajanja priporočil in obiskov na kraju samem.
Want to know more? 
Želite izvedeti več?
Full information on our audit of EU expenditure for Global Europe can be found in Chapter 8 of the 2014 annual report on the EU budget. 
Vse informacije o naši reviziji odhodkov EU za Evropo v svetu so v poglavju 8 letnega poročila o proračunu EU za leto 2014.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 41 Administration €8.8 billion What we audited Administration covers the expenditure of EU institutions and other bodies. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 41 Uprava 8,8 milijarde EUR Kaj je Sodišče revidiralo Področje uprave zajema odhodke institucij in drugih organov EU.
These are the Commission, Parliament, European External Action Service (EEAS), European Council and Council, European Court of Justice, European Court of Auditors, European Economic and Social Committee, Committee of Regions, European Ombudsman and European Data Protection Supervisor. 
Ti so Komisija, Parlament, Evropska služba za zunanje zadeve, Evropski svet in Svet, Sodišče Evropske unije, Evropsko računsko sodišče, Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, Odbor regij, Evropski varuh človekovih pravic in Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov.
It also includes payments to the European Schools. 
Vključuje tudi plačila evropskim šolam.
Spending on human resources (salaries, allowances and pensions) accounts for about 60 % of the total. 
Poraba za človeške vire (plače, dodatki in pokojnine) pomeni približno 60 % celotne porabe.
Expenditure on buildings, equipment, energy, communications and information technology accounts for the remainder. 
Odhodki za stavbe, opremo, energijo, komunikacije in informacijsko tehnologijo pomenijo preostanek porabe.
The results of our audits of the European Union agencies and other decentralised bodies are reported in specific annual reports, which are published separately, together with a summary of the results. 
Evropsko računsko sodišče o rezultatih svojih revizij agencij in drugih decentraliziranih organov Evropske unije poroča v specifičnih letnih poročilih, ki so objavljena posebej, skupaj s povzetkom rezultatov.
What we found 1 Equivalent estimated levels of error for 2013 to reflect the new MFF headings. 
Ugotovitve Sodišča 1 Ekvivalentna ocenjena stopnja napake za leto 2013, ki odraža nove razdelke večletnega finančnega okvira.
Our examination of systems did not reveal any significant weaknesses overall. 
Sodišče pri preučitvi sistemov v glavnem ni ugotovilo resnih slabosti.
However, we found some areas where there is scope for improvement in certain institutions and bodies. 
Ugotovilo pa je nekaj področij, na katerih za nekatere institucije in organe še obstajajo možnosti za izboljšanje.
These are covered in the following recommendations. 
Ta so zajeta v spodnja priporočila.
Estimated level of error1: No 0.5 % (2013: 1.1 %) 
Ne 0,5 % (leta 2013: 1,1 %)