natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such a strengthened role is being considered in the upcoming update of the CAFS (see Commission's replies to paragraphs 50-54 and recommendation 2.1). 
Tako okrepljena vloga se upošteva v prihodnji posodobitvi strategije Komisije za boj proti goljufijam (glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke 50–54 in priporočilo 2.1).
As far as real time detailed analysis of fraud patterns and the causes of fraud is concerned, please refer to the Commission's replies to recommendations 1 and 2.2. 
Kar zadeva podrobno analizo vzorcev goljufij v realnem času in vzroke goljufij, glej odgovora Komisije na priporočili 1 in 2.2.
To the extent possible, the Commission will increasingly present fraud patterns found in OLAF investigations in case compendiums. b) Vis-à-vis the Member States, OLAF will continue to perform its coordinating and advisory functions, notably as the lead service for irregularity reporting and the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Fraud Prevention. 
Kolikor bo mogoče, bo Komisija vzorce goljufij, ugotovljene v preiskavah urada OLAF, vse pogosteje predstavljala v zbirkah primerov. (b) V razmerju do držav članic bo urad OLAF še naprej opravljal svoje usklajevalne in svetovalne funkcije, in sicer kot glavna služba za prijavljanje nepravilnosti in Svetovalni odbor za usklajevanje preprečevanja goljufij.
Likewise, the Authorising Officers Responsible in the Directorates-General in charge of shared management will continue to exercise their supervisory role over the Member States. 
Podobno bodo tudi odgovorni odredbodajalci v generalnih direktoratih, pristojnih za deljeno upravljanje, še naprej izvajali svojo vlogo nadzornika nad državami članicami.
OLAF will then in turn review the anti-fraud policies of those spending Directorates-General, as outlined above. 
Urad OLAF bo nato pregledoval politike navedenih generalnih direktoratov porabnikov na področju boja proti goljufijam, kot je opisano zgoraj.
The analytical component of OLAF's enhanced role can only gradually be implemented and will not be fully operational before the mid-point of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021–2027 (please refer to the Commission's reply to recommendation 2.2.). 
Analitično komponento okrepljene vloge urada OLAF je mogoče izvajati le postopoma, tako da se na sredini večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2021–2027 še ne bo v celoti uporabljala (glej odgovor Komisije na priporočilo 2.2.).
As the ECA acknowledges, a comprehensive fraud risk assessment forms the basis for fully effective fraud risk management. 
Kot priznava Evropsko računsko sodišče, je celovita ocena tveganja goljufij podlaga za v celoti učinkovito obvladovanje tveganja goljufij.
Consequently, the OLAF’s analytical capabilities and its reinforced oversight role will gain effectiveness in a gradual process. 30 
Posledično bodo analitične zmogljivosti urada OLAF in njegova okrepljena nadzorna vloga postopoma postajale učinkovitejše. 30
Audit team The ECA’s special reports set out the results of its audits of EU policies and programmes, or of management-related topics from specific budgetary areas. 
Revizijska ekipa Posebna poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča predstavljajo rezultate njegovih revizij politik in programov EU ali tem v zvezi z upravljanjem na posameznih področjih proračuna.
The ECA selects and designs these audit tasks to be of maximum impact by considering the risks to performance or compliance, the level of income or spending involved, forthcoming developments and political and public interest. 
Računsko sodišče izbira in načrtuje revizijske naloge tako, da je njihov učinek kar največji, in pri tem upošteva tveganje za smotrnost ali skladnost, višino ustreznih prihodkov ali porabe, prihodnji razvoj in politični javni interes.
The audit was led by ECA Member Juhan Parts, supported by Ken-Marti Vaher, Head of Private Office and Margus Kurm, Private Office Attaché; Judit Oroszki, Principal Manager and Head of Task; Tomasz Plebanowicz, Deputy Head of Task; Rogelio Abarquero Grossi, Daria Bochnar, Jana Janeckova and Anzela Poliulianaite, Auditors. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Juhan Parts, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njegovega kabineta Ken-Marti Vaher, ataše v njegovem kabinetu Margus Kurm, vodilna upravna uslužbenka in vodja naloge Judit Oroszki, namestnk vodje naloge Tomasz Plebanowicz ter revizorji Rogelio Abarquero Grossi, Daria Bochnar, Jana Janeckova in Anzela Poliulianaite.
Michael Pyper provided linguistic support and Valérie Tempez-Erasmi provided secretarial assistance. 
Jezikovno podporo je zagotovil Michael Pyper, Valérie Tempez-Erasmi pa je opravila tajniške naloge.
From left to right: Ken-Marti Vaher, Judit Oroszki, Tomasz Plebanowicz, Juhan Parts, Michael Pyper, Daria Bochnar, Anzela Poliulianaite, Jana Janeckova, Rogelio Abarquero Grossi, Valérie Tempez-Erasmi, Margus Kurm. 
Od leve proti desni: Ken-Marti Vaher, Judit Oroszki, Tomasz Plebanowicz, Juhan Parts, Michael Pyper, Daria Bochnar, Anzela Poliulianaite, Jana Janeckova, Rogelio Abarquero Grossi, Valérie Tempez-Erasmi, Margus Kurm.
Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 4.4.2017 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 26.6.2018 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 14.11.2018 Commission’s (or other auditee’s) official replies received in all languages EN: 8.1.2019 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1460-5 doi:10.2865/951680 QJ-AB-18-030-EN-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1466-7 doi:10.2865/057159 QJ-AB-18-030-EN-Q 
Dogodek Datum Sprejetje revizijskega memoranduma / začetek revizije 4.4.2017 Osnutek poročila uradno poslan Komisiji (ali drugemu revidirancu) 26.6.2018 Sprejetje končnega poročila po razčiščevalnem postopku 14.11.2018 Prejeti uradni odgovori Komisije (ali drugega revidiranca) v vseh jezikih EN: 8.1.2019 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1455-1 doi:10.2865/90178 QJ-AB-18-030-SL-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1461-2 doi:10.2865/943614 QJ-AB-18-030-SL-Q
Protecting the EU’s financial interests against fraud is a key responsibility of the European Commission. 
Zaščita finančnih interesov EU pred goljufijami je ena od ključnih odgovornosti Evropske komisije.
The Commission ‘s own Directorates-General, Executive agencies and Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) work with a large number of other organisations, including authorities in the Member States and the future European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). 
Generalni direktorati Komisije, izvajalske agencije in Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) sodelujejo z mnogimi drugimi organizacijami, vključno z organi v državah članicah in prihodnjim Evropskim javnim tožilstvom.
In this audit we assessed whether the Commission is properly managing the risk of fraudulent activities to the detriment of the EU budget. 
Pri tej reviziji je Sodišče ocenilo, ali Komisija ustrezno obvladuje tveganje goljufivih dejanj v škodo proračunu EU.
We found that the Commission lacks comprehensive and comparable data on the detected fraud level in EU spending. 
Ugotovilo je, da Komisija o stopnji odkritih goljufij pri porabi EU nima izčrpnih in primerljivih podatkov.
Moreover, it has so far not carried out any assessment of undetected fraud, nor detailed analysis of what causes economic actors to engage in fraudulent activities. 
Prav tako doslej še ni opravila nobene ocene neodkritih goljufij niti podrobne analize vzrokov, zakaj gospodarski subjekti zagrešijo goljufiva dejanja.
This reduces the practical value and effectiveness of the Commission’s strategic plans for protecting the EU’s financial interests against fraud. 
To zmanjšuje praktično vrednost in uspešnost strateških načrtov Komisije za zaščito finančnih interesov EU pred goljufijami.
The current system, whereby OLAF’s administrative investigation of suspected fraud is followed by a criminal investigation at national level, takes up much time in a considerable number of cases and thus it decreases the chances to achieve prosecution. 
Sedanji sistem, pri katerem upravni preiskavi suma goljufije urada OLAF sledi kazenska preiskava na nacionalni ravni, je v mnogih primerih dolgotrajen, zato se zmanjšajo možnosti za dosego njegovega končnega cilja – pregona.
In addition, OLAF’s final reports often do not provide sufficient information to initiate the recovery of unduly disbursed funds. 
Prav tako končna poročila urada OLAF vsebujejo premalo informacij, da bi bile te lahko podlaga za sprožitev izterjave nepravilno izplačanih sredstev.
Fewer than half of OLAF investigations have led to prosecution of suspected fraudsters and resulted in recovery of less than a third of unduly paid EU money. 
Preiskave urada OLAF so pripeljale do pregona osumljenih goljufov v manj kot polovici primerov, na njihovi podlagi pa je bila izterjana manj kot tretjina nepravilno izplačanih sredstev EU.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors © European Union, 2019 For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the European Union copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Vprašanja: eca.europa.eu/sl/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Spletišče: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors ©Evropska unija, 2019. Za dovoljenje za uporabo ali reprodukcijo fotografij ali drugega gradiva, za katere Evropska unija nima avtorskih pravic, je treba zaprositi neposredno imetnike avtorskih pravic.
EN 2019 Special Report NO 03 European Fund for Strategic Investments: Action needed to make EFSI a full success (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
03 Posebno poročilo SL 2019 Evropski sklad za strateške naložbe: za celovit uspeh sklada EFSI so potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
Contents Executive summary Introduction Audit scope and approach Observations The EIB Group approved close to the expected levels of higher-risk financing under EFSI The total approved EFSI financing in the first 3 years reached the amounts % originally expected EFSI increased the EIB’s higher-risk financing less than expected The EIB has scope to further promote the use of higher-risk financial products for EFSI EFSI partly replaced funding from other financial instruments supported by the EU budget Nearly a third of projects signed under Infrastructure and Innovation Window could have been financed without EFSI support, but not on such favourable terms The reported “investment mobilised” and “multiplier effect” are overstated EFSI reaches different sectors but its geographical distribution is not balanced Conclusions and recommendations Annexes Annex I — Reported data for EFSI operations as at 30 June 2018 Annex II — EIB group product categories Annex III — ESIF financial instruments for the 2014-2020 period Annex IV — List of EFSI performance and monitoring indicators Paragraph I-XI 01-11 12-14 15-79 15-29 16-18 19-23 24-29 30-37 38-47 48-64 65-79 80-88 2 Annex V — EFSI operations with NPBI participation as of 31 December 2017 Glossary Replies of the Commission and the EIB Audit team 3 
Vsebina Povzetek Uvod Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Opažanja Skupina EIB je v okviru sklada EFSI odobrila zneske financiranja z višjim tveganjem blizu pričakovane višine Skupno odobreno financiranje sklada EFSI v prvih treh letih je doseglo prvotno načrtovane zneske S skladom EFSI se je financiranje EIB z višjim tveganjem povečalo manj, kot je bilo pričakovano EIB ima možnost nadalje spodbujati uporabo finančnih produktov z višjim tveganjem za sklad EFSI Sklad EFSI je delno nadomestil financiranje iz drugih finančnih instrumentov, ki jih podpira proračun EU Skoraj tretjina projektov, sklenjenih v okviru dela za infrastrukturo in inovacije, bi lahko bila financirana brez podpore sklada EFSI, vendar ne pod tako ugodnimi pogoji „Privabljene naložbe“ in „multiplikacijski učinek“, o katerih se je poročalo, so precenjeni Sklad EFSI seže na različne sektorje, vendar njegova geografska porazdelitev ni uravnotežena Zaključki in priporočila Prilogi Priloga I — Sporočeni podatki za operacije sklada EFSI na dan 30. junija 2018 Priloga II — Kategorije produktov skupine EIB Odstavek I-XI 01-11 12-14 15-79 15-29 16-18 19-23 24-29 30-37 38-47 48-64 65-79 80-88 2 Priloga III — Finančni instrumenti skladov ESI za obdobje 2014– 2020 Priloga IV — Seznam kazalnikov smotrnosti in spremljanja za sklad EFSI Priloga V — Operacije sklada EFSI z udeležbo nacionalnih spodbujevalnih bank in institucij na dan 31. decembra 2017 Glosar Revizijska ekipa 3
Executive summary I The European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) was set up in 2015 as part of the “Investment Plan for Europe” designed to tackle the investment gap that emerged following the financial and economic crisis, which began in 2008. 
Povzetek I Evropski sklad za strateške naložbe (EFSI) je bil ustanovljen leta 2015 kot del naložbenega načrta za Evropo, katerega cilj je odpraviti naložbeno vrzel, ki je nastala po finančni in ekonomski krizi z začetkom leta 2008.
It was established within the EIB and is governed by a Steering Board composed of representatives of the Commission and the EIB. 
Ustanovljen je bil v okviru EIB, upravlja pa ga usmerjevalni odbor, sestavljen iz predstavnikov Komisije in EIB.
EFSI was initially set up to use a €16 billion EU budget guarantee and €5 billion of EIB own resources to enable the EIB Group to provide around €61 billion of finance with the goal of mobilising an additional €315 billion, by July 2018, of strategic investments in infrastructure and SMEs, covering most EU policy areas and all Member States. 
Sklad EFSI je bil prvotno ustanovljen za to, da bi skupina EIB s 16 milijardami EUR proračunskega jamstva EU in 5 milijardami EUR lastnih sredstev zagotovila okoli 61 milijard EUR financiranja s ciljem do julija 2018 privabiti dodatnih 315 milijard EUR strateških naložb v infrastrukturo in mala in srednja podjetja (MSP), ki bi zajemale večino področij EU in vse države članice.
II The audit objective was to assess whether EFSI was effective in raising finance to support additional investment within the whole EU. 
II Cilj revizije je bil oceniti, ali je bil sklad EFSI uspešen pri zbiranju finančnih sredstev za podporo dodatnim naložbam po celotni EU.
Based on a risk assessment, we examined whether: (a) the EIB provided the expected level of higher-risk financing by July 2018; (b) EFSI replaced other EIB and EU financing operations; (c) investment projects could have been financed in the EFSI implementation period with other public or private funds; (d) reported estimates of investments mobilised by EFSI were realistic in terms of their impact on the real economy; (e) the EFSI investment portfolio was suitably balanced in terms of relevant EU policy areas and geographic concentration. 
Na podlagi ocene tveganja je Sodišče preučilo, ali: (a) je EIB do julija 2018 zagotovila pričakovani obseg financiranja z višjim tveganjem, (b) je sklad EFSI nadomestil druge operacije financiranja EIB in EU, (c) bi bilo naložbene projekte v obdobju izvajanja sklada EFSI mogoče financirati tudi z drugimi javnimi ali zasebnimi sredstvi, (d) so bile sporočene ocene naložb, ki naj bi jih privabil sklad EFSI, realne, kar zadeva njihov vpliv na realno gospodarstvo, (e) je bil naložbeni portfelj sklada EFSI ustrezno uravnotežen, kar zadeva ustrezna področja EU in geografsko osredotočenost.
III Our audit covered the EFSI operations from its launch in 2015 up until July 2018. 
III Revizija Sodišča je zajela operacije sklada EFSI od njegovega začetka leta 2015 do julija 2018.
As part of our audit work, we reviewed reports on EFSI’s performance published by the time of our audit, analysed the EFSI portfolio of operations, and reviewed a sample of operations as well as interviewed and surveyed Commission and EIB group officials, EFSI counterparts, and experts in the field. 
V okviru svojega revizijskega dela je Sodišče pregledalo poročila o smotrnosti poslovanja sklada EFSI, objavljena do izvedbe revizije, analiziralo portfelj operacij sklada EFSI in pregledalo vzorec operacij. Opravilo je tudi razgovore in anketo z uradniki Komisije, skupine EIB, predstavniki sklada EFSI in strokovnjaki na tem področju.
IV We conclude that EFSI has been effective in raising finance to support substantial additional investment in the EU. 
IV Sodišče je prišlo do zaključka, da je bil sklad EFSI uspešen pri zbiranju finančnih sredstev za podporo znatnim dodatnim naložbam v EU.
However, the reported estimate of investment mobilised does not take account of the fact that some EFSI operations replaced other EIB operations and EU financial instruments or the fact that a part of the EFSI support went to projects that could have been financed from other sources, albeit on different 4 
Vendar pri sporočeni oceni privabljenih naložb ni bilo upoštevano to, da so nekatere operacije sklada EFSI nadomestile druge operacije EIB in finančne instrumente EU ali da je bil del podpore iz sklada EFSI porabljen za projekte, ki bi lahko bili financirani iz drugih virov, čeprav pod 4
V We found that the EIB Group had succeeded in approving more than €59 billion of EFSI financial operations as at 30 June 2018. 
V Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je skupina EIB do 30. junija 2018 uspešno odobrila več kot 59 milijard EUR finančnih operacij EFSI.
Moreover, EIB Group approved financing reached €65.5 billion by 17 July 2018. 
Do 17. julija 2018 je financiranje, ki ga je odobrila skupina EIB, znašalo celo 65,5 milijarde EUR.
A number of factors contributed to this result, including establishing EFSI as a budgetary guarantee provided to the EIB, providing it with operational flexibility, setting few targets or constraints on the EFSI investment portfolio, introducing streamlined governance arrangements, and enhancing cooperation with National Promotional Banks or Institutions. 
Na ta rezultat je vplivalo več dejavnikov, med drugim vzpostavitev sklada EFSI kot proračunskega jamstva za EIB, zagotovitev operativne fleksibilnosti sklada EFSI, določitev malega števila ciljev ali omejitev za naložbeni portfelj sklada EFSI, uvedba racionaliziranih ureditev upravljanja ter okrepljeno sodelovanje z nacionalnimi spodbujevalnimi bankami ali institucijami.
VI EFSI support enabled the EIB to achieve a four-fold increase in its higher-risk financing operations compared to 2014. 
VI Podpora sklada EFSI je EIB omogočila doseči štirikratno povečanje operacij financiranja z višjim tveganjem v primerjavi z letom 2014.
However, the value of EFSI related higher-risk financial operations actually signed by the EIB was lower than planned. 
Vendar je bila vrednost operacij financiranja z višjim tveganjem, povezanih s skladom EFSI, ki jih je EIB dejansko sklenila, nižja od načrtovane.
The EIB undertook higher-risk financing by offering classic senior investment loans with longer maturities, taking unsecured positions where all or most other lenders were secured, and dealing with higher-risk counterparts, while making relatively little use of other available higher-risk financial products. 
EIB je izvajala financiranje z večjim tveganjem tako, da je ponujala klasična prednostna naložbena posojila z daljšo zapadlostjo, pri čemer je prevzela nezavarovane pozicije, kadar so bili vsi drugi posojilodajalci ali večina njih zavarovani, in obravnavala nasprotne strani z višjim tveganjem, hkrati pa je relativno malo uporabljala druge razpoložljive finančne produkte z višjim tveganjem.
VII EFSI also partly replaced funding from other centrally managed EU financial instruments, in particular in the fields of transport and energy. 
VII Sklad EFSI je delno nadomestil tudi financiranje iz drugih centralno upravljanih finančnih instrumentov EU, zlasti na področjih prometa in energetike.
In addition, we identified a need for the Commission and the EIB to consider the potential future overlaps between operations under the EFSI Infrastructure and Innovation Window and the European Structural and Investment Funds financial instruments. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da bi bilo potrebno, da Komisija in EIB preučita morebitna prihodnja prekrivanja med operacijami v okviru dela za infrastrukturo in inovacije sklada EFSI in finančnimi instrumenti skladov ESI.
VIII The fact that an EFSI operation was assessed as providing additionality in line with the EFSI Regulation’s definition and classified as being higher risk than a normal EIB operation did not necessarily mean that the project could not have been financed from other sources. 
VIII To, da je bilo za neko operacijo sklada EFSI ocenjeno, da zagotavlja dodatnost v skladu z opredelitvijo iz uredbe o skladu EFSI in se uvršča v kategorijo z višjim tveganjem kot običajna operacija EIB, ni nujno pomenilo, da projekt ne bi mogel biti financiran iz drugih virov financiranja.
Our survey results showed that nearly a third of Infrastructure and Innovation Window financed projects would have been undertaken even without EFSI support. 
Rezultati ankete Sodišča so pokazali, da bi bila skoraj tretjina projektov, financiranih iz dela za infrastrukturo in inovacije, izvedena tudi brez podpore sklada EFSI.
Project promoters largely preferred EFSI financing because it was either cheaper or offered a longer payback period. 
Nosilci projektov so večinoma dajali prednost skladu EFSI, saj je bilo to bodisi ceneje ali je zagotavljalo daljše obdobje odplačevanja.
We found some cases where the EFSI projects could have been financed by private and other public sources or by the EIB as a normal operation albeit under different terms. 
Sodišče je odkrilo nekaj specifičnih primerov, v katerih bi se lahko projekti sklada EFSI financirali iz zasebnih in drugih javnih virov ali prek EIB kot običajne operacije, četudi pod drugimi pogoji.
IX The methodology used to estimate the investment mobilised overstated, in some cases, the extent to which EFSI support actually induced additional investment in the real economy. 
IX Z metodologijo, ki se je uporabljala za oceno privabljenih naložb, je bilo v nekaterih primerih precenjeno, koliko je podpora EFSI dejansko spodbudila dodatne naložbe v realno gospodarstvo.
The lack of comparable performance and monitoring indicators for all EU financial instruments and budgetary guarantees diminishes transparency and the ability to assess results. 
Umanjkanje primerljivih kazalnikov smotrnosti in 5 spremljanja za vse finančne instrumente EU in proračunska jamstva zmanjšuje preglednost in sposobnost za oceno rezultatov.
X The EFSI portfolio at the end of 2017 was within the indicative limits set for investing in specific policy sectors. 
X Portfelj sklada EFSI je bil ob koncu leta 2017 v razponu okvirnih omejitev, določenih za naložbe na specifičnih področjih.
However, the geographic concentration of EFSI signed financing operations was not sufficiently balanced, mostly ending up in a few of the larger EU 15 Member States. 
Vendar pa geografska koncentracija operacij financiranja, sklenjenih v okviru sklada EFSI, ni bila zadostno uravnotežena, saj so se te izvajale predvsem v nekaj večjih državah članicah EU-15.
The countries with the highest EFSI uptake were those with the most developed and active National Promotional Banks and Institutions, thus suggesting a need to provide support, including technical assistance, to those that are less developed. 
Države z največjo stopnjo uporabe sklada EFSI so bile tiste, ki imajo najbolj razvite in dejavne nacionalne spodbujevalne banke in institucije, kar kaže, da bi bilo treba podporo, vključno s tehnično pomočjo, zagotoviti tistim državam, v katerih so te manj razvite.