natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Number of OPs which represent no particular risk as the most recent error rate < 2 % 7 2. 
Število operativnih programov, ki ne pomenijo posebnega tveganja,saj je najnovejša stopnja napake < 2 % 7 2.
Error rate shows a clear decreasing trend after preventive measures and/or financial corrections have been initiated 3. 
Stopnja napake kaže jasen trend zmanjševanja po preventivnih ukrepih in/ali finančnih popravkih, ki so bili uvedeni 3.
Error rate increased/fluctuated despite the preventive measures and/or financial corrections initiated 9 Total 20 
Stopnja napake se je povečala/je nihala kljub uvedenim preventivnim ukrepom in/ali finančnim popravkom 9 Skupaj 20
Finally, the measures address particular types of errors (e.g. specific restrictive selection criteria or problems with the method of selecting projects to be co‐financed). 
napak (npr. specifična omejevalna izbirna merila ali problemi z metodo izbire projektov, ki naj bi se sofinancirali).
Therefore, the Commission’s measures in many cases correct/prevent errors related to a part of an OP and are related to certain specific types of errors. 
Zato ukrepi Komisije v mnogih primerih popravljajo/preprečujejo napake, ki zadevajo del operativnega programa, ali nekatere specifične vrste napak.
The Commission made efforts to increase the effect of its preventive measures and financial corrections by extending these measures to other programmes where similar weaknesses have been noted. 
Komisija si je prizadevala za povečanje učinka svojih preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov tako, da je te ukrepe razširila na druge programe, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene podobne slabosti.
This led to an increased impact (see Box 4). 
To je povečalo njihov učinek (glej okvir 4).
The Commission’s reporting on preventive measures and financial corrections made it difficult to get a comprehensive and analytical overview Information on preventive measures and financial corrections is presented in several reports and documents 112. 
S poročanjem Komisije o preventivnih ukrepih in finančnih popravkih je bilo težko dobiti celovit in analitičen pregled Informacije o preventivnih ukrepih in finančnih popravkih so predstavljene v več poročilih in dokumentih 112.
The Commission should report on preventive measures and financial corrections in a comprehensive and coherent way to ensure that relevant information is accessible and easy 57 Box 4 – Commission good practice in increasing the impact of its measures: Hungary In autumn 2012 the Commission carried out an audit on public procurement related to the Hungarian OPs for the Environment and for Public Administration. 
Dopolnjevala so jih četrtletna poročila o finančnih popravkih in letno poročilo o upravljanju in smotrnosti 54 Okvir 4 – Dobra praksa Komisije, ki je povečala učinek njenih ukrepov: Madžarska Komisija je jeseni leta 2012 izvedla revizijo javnega naročanja z zvezi z madžarskima operativnima programoma za okolje in javno upravo.
This audit revealed that one of the selection criteria used (compulsory requirement for registration with the Hungarian Chamber of Engineers at the tender submission stage) was discriminatory and the audited programmes were pre‐ suspended in spring 2013. 
Pri reviziji se je pokazalo, da je bilo eno od izbirnih meril (obvezna včlanitev v madžarsko inženirsko zbornico v fazi oddaje ponudbe) diskriminatorno, in revidirani programi so bili spomladi leta 2013 predhodno začasno ustavljeni.
The Commission considered these shortcomings to be systematic and to go beyond the remit of the OPs audited. 
Komisija je za te pomanjkljivosti menila, da so sistematične in da presegajo področje revidiranih operativnih programov.
This is why the Commission also interrupted payment claims introduced by Hungary for two additional programmes (OPs for Transport and Social Infrastructure). 
Zato je Komisija prekinila tudi plačila zahtevkov, ki jih je Madžarska predložila za dva dodatna programa (operativna programa za promet in socialno infrastrukturo).
The managing authorities of these programmes were asked to analyse if the same erroneous practices had occurred in these programmes as well. 
Organe upravljanja teh programov je pozvala, naj analizirajo, ali je do istih napačnih praks prišlo tudi v teh programih.
As a result of these verifications by the national authorities, the Commission imposed financial corrections on all four programmes. 
Po preverjanjih nacionalnih organov je Komisija naložila finančne popravke za vse štiri programe.
These were complemented by the quarterly reports on financial corrections and the “Annual Management and Performance Report” (until 2014 the “Annual Synthesis Report on the Commission’s management achievements”) (see Table 5). 58 
izvrševanja proračuna EU (do leta 2014: letno zbirno poročilo o upravljavskih dosežkih Komisije) (glej tabelo 5). 55
Table 5 ‐ Commission publications in relation to preventive measures and financial corrections Title To whom Presented by Coverage Content Published since Annual activity reports European Parliament and the Council 31 March1 specific policy area The annual activity report details the achievements and initiatives taken during the year and provided for in the management plan, as well as the resources used. 
Tabela 5 – Publikacije Komisije v zvezi s preventivnimi ukrepi in finančnimi popravki Naslov Naslovnik Datum objave Področje Vsebina Objavlja se od leta Letna poročila o dejavnostih Evropski parlament in Svet 31. marec1 specifično področje V letnih poročilih o dejavnostih so natančno navedeni dosežki in pobude, ki so bile dane med letom in so navedene v načrtu upravljanja, ter uporabljeni viri.
It also contains detailed Member State level information concerning the Commission's control activities and related preventive measures and financial corrections. 
2007 Vključujejo tudi podrobne informacije na ravni držav članic o nadzornih dejavnostih Komisije in z njimi povezanih preventivnih ukrepih in finančnih popravkih.
The EU's annual accounts consist of the financial statements (and its notes) and the consolidated reports on the implementation of the budget. 
Letni zaključni račun EU obsega računovodske izkaze (in pojasnila) in konsolidirana poročila o izvrševanju proračuna.
It contains aggregate information per fund on financial corrections. 
Vsebuje zbirne informacije o finančnih popravkih za posamezen sklad.
Concerning preventive measures till 2012 (incl.) the information was provided per Member State, from 2013 however, only aggregated figures per fund are published. 
V zvezi s preventivnimi ukrepi do (vključno) leta 2012 so se informacije 2007 zagotavljale za vsako državo članico, od leta 2013 pa se objavljajo samo zbirni podatki za vsak sklad.
As of 2015 the information on preventive measures is no longer reported in the annual accounts, but only in the Communication. 
Od leta 2015 se o informacijah o preventivnih ukrepih ne poroča več v zaključnem računu, temveč samo v sporočilu.
2007 Annual accounts European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors 31 July whole budget 2007 Communication European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors 31 October2 whole budget The Communication describes the functioning of the preventive and corrective mechanisms used to protect the EU budget from illegal or irregular expenditure, and to provide a best estimate of the figures resulting from their use. 
V sporočilu je podrobno opisano delovanje preventivnih in popravljalnih mehanizmov, ki se uporabljajo za zaščito proračuna EU pred nezakonitimi ali nepravilnimi odhodki in zagotavljanje najboljše ocene podatkov, ki izhajajo iz 2012 njihove uporabe.
On preventive measures it contains aggregated information and on financial corrections it contains aggregated information as well as information at Member State level. 
Vsebuje zbirne podatke o preventivnih ukrepih ter zbirne podatke in podatke na ravni držav članic za finančne popravke.
2012 Quarterly report European Parliament End of each quarter specific policy area The quarterly reports provide regular information on the financial corrections per fund under the cohesion policy. 
Četrtletna poročila zagotavljajo redne informacije o finančnih popravkih za posamezne sklade v okviru 2008 kohezijske politike.
The synthesis reports detail the previous year's management achievements based on the annual activity reports presented by the different Directors‐General. 
V zbirnih poročilih so navedene podrobnosti o upravljavskih dosežkih preteklega leta na podlagi letnih 2007 poročil o dejavnostih, ki so jih predstavili različni generalni direktorji.
2 As of financial year 2015 the Communication document is presented as part of the so‐called ‘integrated financial reporting package’ together with the consolidated annual accounts by 31 July. 
2 Od proračunskega leta 2015 dalje se sporočilo predloži kot del t. i. celovitega svežnja finančnih poročil skupaj s konsolidiranim zaključnim računom do 31. julija.
All reports, except for the annual activity reports, were compiled by the Commission’s Directorate‐General for Budget, based on the information provided by the Directorate‐ General for Regional and Urban Policy and the Directorate‐General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion according to the instructions or guidelines (for the annual activity reports of the Directorates‐General) issued by the Directorate‐General for Budget. 
Vsa poročila, razen letnih poročil o dejavnostih, je pripravil Generalni direktorat Komisije za proračun na podlagi informacij, ki sta jih zagotovila Generalni direktorat za regionalno in mestno politiko ter Generalni direktorat za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje v skladu z navodili ali smernicami (za letna poročila o dejavnostih generalnih direktoratov), ki jih je izdal Generalni direktorat za proračun.
So far, none of the Commission reports have provided an analytical overview of preventive measures and financial corrections for the 2007‐2013 programme period 115. 
Doslej v nobenem poročilu Komisije ni bilo analitičnega pregleda preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 115.
Cohesion spending is based on multi‐annual programming. 
Odhodki za kohezijo temeljijo na večletnem programskem načrtovanju.
We consider therefore that the Commission should provide the European Parliament and the Council with a consolidated report containing key information on preventive measures and financial corrections relating to the programme period to date40. 116. 
Sodišče zato meni, da bi morala Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu zagotoviti konsolidirano poročilo, ki bi vsebovalo ključne informacije o preventivnih ukrepih in finančnih popravkih, ki se nanašajo na programsko obdobje do sedaj.40 116.
The analysis of the relevant reports listed in Table 5, however, showed that collectively they present preventive measures and financial corrections in relation to a number of years. 
Pri analizi relevantnih poročil, navedenih v tabeli 5, pa se je pokazalo, da skupaj predstavljajo preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke za več let.
However, no specific report providing an analytical overview was envisaged for the programme period as a whole. 
Vendar za programsko obdobje kot celoto ni bilo predvideno nobeno specifično poročilo z analitičnim pregledom.
As regards the 2000‐2006 period, we note that the Commission issued an ad hoc report on the financial corrections and status of closure of the ERDF and ESF programmes and CF projects in 2013. 
Kar zadeva obdobje 2000–2006, je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je Komisija objavila ad hoc poročilo o finančnih popravkih in stanju zaključevanja programov ESRR in ESS ter projektov Kohezijskega sklada v letu 2013.
Commission reports did not provide enough Member State comparisons and “good practice” examples on how to prevent, detect or correct recurrent problems 118. 
V poročilih Komisije ni bilo dovolj primerjav med državami članicami in primerov dobre prakse o preprečevanju, odkrivanju in popravljanju ponavljajočih se problemov 118.
The Commission reports should provide relevant information which improves understanding of the situation regarding preventive measures and financial corrections, so that appropriate action can be taken to improve management and control systems. 
Poročila Komisije naj bi zagotovila relevantne informacije, ki izboljšajo razumevanje stanja v zvezi s preventivnimi ukrepi in finančnimi popravki, tako da se lahko sprejmejo ustrezni ukrepi za izboljšanje sistemov upravljanja in kontrole.
We therefore asked members of the European Parliament’s Budgetary Control and Regional Development committees and representatives of Member States of the Council of the 40 60 Special Report No 36/2016 on the assessment of the arrangements for closure of the 2007‐2013 cohesion and rural development programmes (paragraph 56) (http://eca.europa.eu). 
Sodišče je zato je vprašalo člane odborov Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor in regionalni razvoj ter 40 59 Posebno poročilo št.
European Union’s Structural Actions Working Party about their perception of the usefulness of the available reports. 
predstavnike Delovne skupine za strukturne ukrepe držav članic Sveta Evropske unije, kaj mislijo o uporabnosti razpoložljivih poročil.
Most of the interviewees found the information provided by the Commission to be sufficient, or even too much, in volume. 
Večina vprašanih je menila, da je količina informacij, ki jih je predložila Komisija, zadostna ali celo prevelika.
Interviewees from Member States found the annual activity reports the most useful source of information as they contain information which can be used to benchmark their own programmes against those of other Member States. 
Vprašani iz držav članic so menili, da so letna poročila o dejavnosti najuporabnejši vir informacij, saj vsebujejo informacije, ki jih je mogoče uporabiti za primerjavo njihovih programov s programi drugih držav članic.
Finally, very few of the interviewees were aware of the quarterly reports. 
Zelo malo vprašanih pa je bilo seznanjenih s četrtletnimi poročili.
While most of the interviewees considered that the Commission clearly communicates the system and set‐up of the measures to protect the EU budget, half of them would like to have more information on the actual application of the measures and their practical implications. 
Večina vprašanih je sicer menila, da je komunikacija Komisije o sistemu in strukturi ukrepov za zaščito proračuna EU jasna, vendar bi jih polovica želela imeti več informacij o dejanski uporabi ukrepov in njihovih praktičnih vidikih.
During our interviews the following issues were raised: explanations of recurrent problems in relation to declaring irregular expenditure, causes of typical or repetitive errors and “best practices” on how to prevent, detect or correct them. 
Med razgovori so bile omenjene naslednje zadeve: razlaga ponavljajočih se problemov v zvezi s prijavo nepravilnih odhodkov, vzroki značilnih ali ponavljajočih se napak in primeri najboljših praks o tem, kako te napake preprečiti, odkriti ali popraviti.
Such information would help Member States to improve their own management and control systems. 
Te informacije bi državam članicam pomagale izboljšati njihove sisteme upravljanja in kontrole.
The Commission’s information systems do not provide a consolidated overview of preventive measures and financial corrections 121. 
Informacijski sistemi Komisije ne dajejo celovitega pregleda nad preventivnimi ukrepi in finančnimi popravki 121.
The Commission’s Directorates‐General record the information necessary for monitoring and reporting on preventive measures and financial corrections in its accounting system and in different electronic spreadsheets. 
Generalni direktorati Komisije evidentirajo informacije, potrebne za spremljanje preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov in poročanje o njih, v svojih računovodskih sistemih in v različnih elektronskih razpredelnicah.
We found that the latter suffered from various shortcomings which made it difficult to get an easy overview and to perform in‐ depth analyses: (a) the different systems are not integrated and data needs to be entered manually; (b) there is no overview for individual cases of all measures taken by the Commission to protect the EU budget. Instead, information is kept separately for preventive measures and financial corrections. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da imajo te razpredelnice več pomanjkljivosti, zaradi česar si je bilo težko ustvariti enostaven pregled in izvesti poglobljene analize: (a) različni sistemi niso povezani in podatke je treba vnesti ročno; (b) za posamezne primere ni enotnega pregleda vseh ukrepov za zaščito proračuna EU, ki jih je sprejela Komisija, temveč se podatki hranijo ločeno za preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke.
As there is no link between the two, it is difficult to see how cases evolve from the triggering event to the lifting of preventive measures or the implementation of financial corrections; and 61 
Ker med seboj niso povezani, je težko ugotoviti, kako se primeri razvijajo od dogodka, ki je povzročil uvedbo postopka, do odprave preventivnega ukrepa ali izvedbe finančnih popravkov; 60
(c) the databases do not always contain the necessary information for a comparative analysis between cases. 
(c) podatkovne zbirke ne vsebujejo vedno informacij, potrebnih za primerjalno analizo primerov.
This would facilitate the work of the ISFC Committee to ensure that similar cases are treated in a similar way. 
ISFCC bi tako lažje zagotavljal, da se podobni primeri obravnavajo podobno.
Regulatory provisions for the 2014‐2020 period significantly strengthened the Commission’s position in protecting the EU budget from irregular expenditure 122. 
Uredbene določbe za obdobje 2014–2020 so bistveno okrepile možnosti Komisije za zaščito proračuna EU pred nepravilnimi odhodki 122.
When setting up and designing the system of preventive measures and financial corrections for a new programme period the Commission should build on the lessons learnt and should mitigate the weaknesses identified during the implementation of the programmes in previous periods. 
Pri vzpostavitvi in zasnovi sistema preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov za novo programsko obdobje bi morala Komisija upoštevati izkušnje in ublažiti slabosti, ugotovljene med izvajanjem programov v prejšnjih obdobjih.
We therefore reviewed relevant EU legislation and compared it with the shortcomings found, to assess to what extent this has been done for the 2014‐2020 programme period. 
Sodišče je pregledalo ustrezno zakonodajo EU in jo primerjalo z ugotovljenimi slabostmi, da bi ocenilo, koliko je bilo to storjeno za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.
Reporting on financial corrections integrated in the annual assurance package and examined by the audit authority 123. 
Poročanje o finančnih popravkih je vključeno v letni sveženj zagotovil, preuči pa ga revizijski organ 123.
For 2007‐2013 programme period, the Commission itself identified shortcomings in relation to the correctness and completeness of information provided in the Article 20 reports and our own audits also identified risks in relation to the Member States’ reported financial corrections that were used by the Commission to calculate the CRR (see paragraphs 103 to 106). 
Za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 je Komisija sama ugotovila pomanjkljivosti glede točnosti in popolnosti informacij, zagotovljenih v poročilih iz člena 20, poleg tega pa so bila tudi pri revizijah, ki jih je izvedlo Sodišče, ugotovljena tveganja v zvezi s finančnimi popravki, o katerih so poročale države članice in ki jih je Komisija uporabila za izračun kumulativnega preostalega tveganja (glej odstavke 103 do 106).
Each year Member States need to submit an assurance package as part of the annual clearance procedure for each OP (or group of OPs). 
Države članice morajo vsako leto v okviru letnega postopka potrditve obračunov za vsak operativni program (ali skupino operativnih programov) predložiti sveženj zagotovil.
This package consists of the annual accounts, including information on amounts withdrawn and recovered41; the management declaration and annual summary of the controls carried out. 
Ta sveženj je sestavljen iz zaključnega računa, vključno z informacijami o preklicanih in izterjanih zneskih41, izjave o upravljanju in letnega povzetka opravljenih kontrol.
The audit authorities issue an audit opinion and provide an annual control report. 
Revizijski organi izdajo revizijsko mnenje in predložijo letno poročilo o nadzoru.
The first assurance packages were produced in the first half of 2016. 
Prvi svežnji zagotovil so bili pripravljeni v prvi polovici leta 2016.
Unlike in previous periods, the information on withdrawn and recovered amounts is now required to be reported in the annual accounts and included in the Member State’s calculation of the CRR for the OP (or group of OPs). 
Za razliko od prejšnjega obdobja je treba zdaj o informacijah o preklicanih in izterjanih zneskih poročati v zaključnem računu, te informacije pa je treba vključiti tudi v izračun 41 Člen 137 Uredbe (EU) št.
The completeness and reliability of this information is now also subject to verifications by the Member State’s audit authorities42. 
Popolnost in zanesljivost teh informacij zdaj preverjajo tudi revizijski organi držav članic42.
On the basis of these documents the Commission is required to perform an annual examination of the operational programme, in the course of which it determines the amount of expenditure eligible for the given year. 
Na podlagi teh dokumentov mora Komisija opraviti letno preučitev operativnega programa, med katero določi znesek upravičenih odhodkov za zadevno leto.
Member States will be required to correct all irregularities before the annual clearance procedure (i.e. withdraw or recover irregular expenditure with the possibility of replacing it with new expenditure). 
Države članice bodo morale pred postopkom letne potrditve obračunov popraviti vse nepravilnosti (tj. preklicati ali izterjati nepravilne odhodke z možnostjo nadomestitve z novimi odhodki).
If this is not done the Commission can launch a financial correction procedure. 
Če tega ne storijo, lahko Komisija sproži postopek za finančni popravek.
Legal provisions introduced for the 2014‐2020 period give more power to the Commission to protect the EU budget 10 % retention from all interim payments during the 2014‐2020 period 127. 
Pravne določbe, ki so bile uvedene za obdobje 2014–2020, dajejo Komisiji več pooblastil za zaščito proračuna EU Zadržanje 10 % vseh vmesnih plačil v obdobju 2014–2020 127.
The 2014‐2020 legislative framework established the instrument of 10 % retention from interim payments43. This means that during the accounting year the Commission pays only 90 % of the declared interim expenditure. 
Z zakonodajnim okvirom za obdobje 2014–2020 je bil uveden instrument za zadržanje 10 % vmesnih plačil.43 To pomeni, da med obračunskim letom Komisija izplača le 90 % prijavljenih vmesnih odhodkov.
The remaining 10 % is cleared after the submission and acceptance of the assurance package. 
Preostalih 10 % se obračuna po predložitvi in sprejetju svežnja zagotovil.
This 10 % retention by the Commission can be compared to a general conditional precautionary measure, which can be paid to the Member State if everything is found to be in order at the annual clearance. 
To, da Komisija zadrži 10 %, je mogoče primerjati s splošnim pogojevalnim previdnostnim ukrepom, zadržan znesek pa se državi članici izplača, če se pri potrditvi obračunov ugotovi, da je vse v redu.
Given the error levels observed during the 2007‐2013 period, we consider that this has the potential to ensure better protection of the EU budget since this creates an adequate buffer for the Commission to take corrective action even in a situation where the Member State fails to implement any financial corrections at all. 
Glede na stopnje napake, ugotovljene v obdobju 2007–2013, Sodišče meni, da bi to lahko zagotovilo boljšo zaščito proračuna EU, saj ustvarja zadostno rezervo, da Komisija lahko sprejme popravljalne ukrepe tudi, če države članice ne izvedejo nobenih finančnih popravkov.
42 43 63 Articles 127 and 137 of Regulation (EC) No 1303/2013. 
62 42 43 Člena 127 in 137 Uredbe (ES) št. 1303/2013.
Article 130 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
Člen 130 Uredbe (EU) št.