natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Executive 06 summary IOn its creation in January 2011, the European External Action Service (EEAS) took over responsibility for running EU delegations around the world from the European Commission. 
Povzetek 06 IEvropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) je ob svoji ustanovitvi januarja 2011 od Evropske komisije prevzela odgovornost za vodenje delegacij EU po vsem svetu.
It provides office space for 5 300 staff in around 140 delegations. 
Zagotavlja pisarniške prostore za 5 300 zaposlenih v približno 140 delegacijah.
The EEAS is also responsible for the residences of heads of delegation and for providing, or reimbursing the costs of, accommodation for 2 400 staff. 
Odgovorna je tudi za rezidence vodij delegacij in plačilo ali povračilo stroškov za stanovanja 2 400 zaposlenih.
The effective management of EU delegation buildings contributes to achieving the EU’s objectives in foreign policy, trade and development cooperation. 
Uspešno upravljanje stavb delegacij EU prispeva k doseganju ciljev EU na področju zunanje politike, trgovine in razvojnega sodelovanja.
EEAS expenditure on delegation buildings in 2014 amounted to 165 million euro (see paragraphs 1 to 4). 
Odhodki ESZD za stavbe delegacij so v letu 2014 znašali 165 milijonov EUR (glej odstavke 1 do 4).
II The European Court of Auditors examined whether delegation buildings meet the needs of the EEAS and provide value for money. 
II Evropsko računsko sodišče je preučilo, ali stavbe delegacij zadostujejo potrebam ESZD in ali so stroškovno učinkovite.
It examined whether the EEAS has effective procedures for selecting the right buildings, monitoring the suitability of buildings and planning necessary changes (see paragraphs 5 and 6). 
Preučilo je, ali ima ESZD uspešne postopke za izbiro primernih stavb, spremljanje ustreznosti stavb in načrtovanje potrebnih sprememb (glej odstavka 5 in 6).
III The audit found that delegation buildings, whether office buildings, residences of heads of delegation or staff accommodation, generally meet the needs of delegations (see paragraphs 8 to 19). 
III Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da stavbe delegacij – pisarniške stavbe, rezidence vodij delegacij in stanovanja zaposlenih – na splošno zadostujejo potrebam delegacij (glej odstavke 8 do 19).
However, in some cases, buildings do not provide best value for money because: (a) space in most office buildings, and some residences, exceeds the ceilings in the building policy (see paragraphs 20 to 22); (b) the EEAS owns buildings which it no longer uses (see paragraphs 23 to 25); (c) where delegations share their office premises with EU Member States or EU institutions or bodies, some charges to hosted organisations do not recover full costs (see paragraphs 26 and 27). 
Vendar pa v nekaterih primerih stavbe niso stroškovno učinkovite, ker: (a) površina v večini pisarniških stavb in v nekaterih rezidencah presega zgornje meje iz stavbne politike (glej odstavke 20 do 22); (b) ima ESZD v lasti stavbe, ki jih ne uporablja več (glej odstavke 23 do 25); (c) kjer si delegacije pisarniške prostore delijo z državami članicami EU ali institucijami ali organi EU, nekateri stroški, ki se zaračunavajo tem organizacijam, ne krijejo celotnih dejanskih stroškov (glej odstavka 26 in 27).
IV The suitability of delegation buildings depends firstly on their initial selection and then on the way the EEAS ensures they continue to meet needs and provide value for money. 
IV Ustreznost stavb delegacij je odvisna predvsem od njihove prvotne izbire, pa tudi od tega, kako ESZD zagotavlja, da stavbe še naprej zadostujejo potrebam in da so stroškovno učinkovite.
The initial selection of buildings for rental or purchase is based on the building-file procedure. 
Prvotna izbira stavb za najem ali nakup se izvede v okviru postopka na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah.
Before renting (or renewing a rental agreement) or buying, the delegation concerned submits a building file to headquarters for examination and approval. 
Zadevna delegacija mora pred najemom (ali podaljšanjem najemne pogodbe) ali nakupom stavbe sedežu predložiti dokumentacijo o stavbah v pregled in odobritev.
In providing a structured and documented basis for decision-making, the building-file procedure is an example of good practice (see paragraphs 30 and 31). 
Postopek na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah je primer dobre prakse pri zagotavljanju strukturirane in dokumentirane podlage za odločanje (glej odstavka 30 in 31).
However, there is a risk that the EEAS does not select the right buildings because there are some weaknesses in the practical application of each of the major stages of the selection procedure: (a) When some delegations search the local market, they have insufficient expertise to identify suitable options and do not receive sufficient support from headquarters (see paragraphs 32 to 35). (b) When delegations present options to headquarters, the proposed solution is sometimes not based on a sound technical and financial analysis (see paragraphs 36 to 43). (c) When the Headquarters Building Committee makes its final decision, it is sometimes too late to sign a contract and it does not always demonstrate that the decision represents best value for money (see paragraphs 44 to 47). 
Vendar pa obstaja tveganje, da ESZD ne izbere ustreznih stavb, saj obstajajo nekatere slabosti pri izvedbi vseh glavnih faz izbirnega postopka v praksi: (a) nekatere delegacije nimajo dovolj strokovnega znanja, da bi pri raziskovanju lokalnega trga opredelile ustrezne možnosti, pa tudi ne zadostne podpore s sedeža (glej odstavke 32 do 35); (b) kadar delegacija sedežu predstavi možnosti, predlagana rešitev včasih ne temelji na dobri tehnični in finančni analizi (glej odstavke 36 do 43); (c) ko odbor za stavbe pri sedežu sprejme končno odločitev, je včasih prepozno za podpis pogodbe, poleg tega pa ni vedno dokazano, da je odločitev stroškovno najbolj učinkovita (glej odstavke 44 do 47).
Executive summary 07 VOnce the EEAS has selected buildings, it regularly assesses whether they continue to meet the needs of delegations through site visits, but it does not identify all shortfalls (see paragraphs 49 and 50). 
Povzetek 07 VKo ESZD izbere stavbe, z obiski na kraju samem redno ocenjuje, ali še naprej zadostujejo potrebam delegacij, vendar ne opredeli vseh pomanjkljivosti (glej odstavka 49 in 50).
The EEAS does not take into account all relevant factors when it monitors the space per person in office buildings (see paragraphs 51 and 52); nor does it monitor that rents of office buildings and residences remain in line with market rates and that charges to co-located organisations recover full costs (see paragraph 53). 
ESZD pri spremljanju površine na osebo v pisarniških stavbah ne upošteva vseh relevantnih dejavnikov (glej odstavka 51 in 52). Prav tako ne spremlja tega, ali so najemnine za pisarniške stavbe in rezidence še vedno v skladu s tržnimi cenami ter ali stroški, ki se zaračunavajo organizacijam za kolokacijo, krijejo celotne dejanske stroške (glej odstavek 53).
Furthermore, the EEAS does not reliably record the results of its monitoring in its information systems (see paragraphs 54 to 59). 
Poleg tega ESZD v svojih informacijskih sistemih ne evidentira zanesljivo rezultatov svojega spremljanja (glej odstavke 54 do 59).
VI The lack of reliable basic information on delegation buildings is an obstacle to effective planning. 
VI Pomanjkanje zanesljivih osnovnih informacij o stavbah delegacij ovira uspešno načrtovanje.
Moreover, headquarters does not make effective use of the information which is available to draw up plans for taking corrective action (see paragraph 60). 
Poleg tega sedež informacij, ki so na voljo, ne uporablja uspešno za pripravo načrtov za sprejetje popravljalnih ukrepov (glej odstavek 60).
Planning focuses on addressing short-term needs (see paragraphs 61 and 62). 
Načrtovanje je osredotočeno na obravnavanje kratkoročnih potreb (glej odstavka 61 in 62).
VII It is the long-term objective of the EEAS to purchase more delegation office premises. 
VII Dolgoročni cilj ESZD je kupiti več pisarniških prostorov za delegacije.
In 2015, under the new provisions in the financial regulation, the EEAS arranged terms for borrowing up to 200 million euro to buy real estate. 
ESZD je leta 2015 na podlagi novih določb finančne uredbe izpogajala pogoje za posojila v višini do 200 milijonov EUR za nakup nepremičnin.
However, the EEAS has limited experience in owning buildings and lacks real-estate management expertise. 
Vendar ima ESZD omejene izkušnje z lastništvom stavb in premalo strokovnega znanja na področju upravljanja nepremičnin.
Consequently, it has not established effective systems to manage owned properties, for example to maintain properties in good condition or to sell buildings which it no longer uses (see paragraphs 63 to 66). 
Zato ni vzpostavila uspešnih sistemov za upravljanje lastniških nepremičnin, na primer za ohranjanje nepremičnin v dobrem stanju ali za prodajajo stavb, ki jih ne uporablja več (glej odstavke 63 do 66).
VIII On the basis of the observations in this report, the Court recommends that the EEAS should: (a) include environmental factors, access for disabled people and flexibility as objectives in the building policy for office buildings; (b) ensure charges paid by EU Member States or other EU institutions or bodies hosted in delegation buildings are consistent and recover full costs; (c) strengthen the application of the building-file procedure for selecting buildings; (d) use a central source of information to verify market rates for office buildings and regularly monitor consistency of office rents with market rates; (e) improve its real-estate management information system, so that it can provide more reliable and relevant information to feed into the planning process; (f) reinforce expertise in real-estate management at headquarters to develop a more strategic approach, improve planning and strengthen support for delegations; (g) establish priorities for rentals, purchases, sales, modifications and maintenance in rolling medium-term plans, using available information on floor space and building condition in order to comply with the building policy; (h) introduce systems to manage owned buildings effectively. 
VIII Na podlagi opažanj v tem poročilu Sodišče priporoča, naj ESZD: (a) med cilje stavbne politike za pisarniške stavbe vključi okoljske dejavnike, dostop za invalidne osebe in prožnost; (b) zagotovi, da bodo stroški, ki jih plačujejo države članice EU ali druge institucije ali organi EU, ki uporabljajo stavbe delegacij, usklajeni in da bodo krili celotne dejanske stroške; (c) pri izbiri stavb okrepi uporabo postopka na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah; (d) uporablja osrednji vir informacij za preverjanje tržnih cen za pisarniške stavbe in redno spremlja skladnost najemnin za pisarne s tržnimi cenami; (e) izboljša svoj informacijski sistem za upravljanje nepremičnin, da bo vseboval zanesljivejše in ustreznejše informacije, ki se uporabijo v procesu načrtovanja; (f) okrepi strokovno znanje na področju upravljanja nepremičnin na sedežu, da se razvije bolj strateški pristop, izboljša načrtovanje in okrepi podpora delegacijam; (g) v tekočih srednjeročnih načrtih določi prednostne naloge za najemnine, nakupe, prodajo, spremembe in vzdrževanje ob upoštevanju razpoložljivih informacij o tlorisni površini in stanju stavb zaradi skladnosti s stavbno politiko; (h) uvede sisteme za uspešno upravljanje lastniških stavb.
Introduction 08 01 The European External Action Service (EEAS) coordinates the EU’s foreign and security policy. 
Uvod 08 01 Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) usklajuje zunanjo in varnostno politiko EU.
The EEAS has its headquarters in Brussels and is responsible for running EU delegations around the world. 
Sedež ima v Bruslju, odgovorna pa je za vodenje delegacij EU po vsem svetu.
The EEAS is structurally and financially independent from the European Commission, but cooperates with it on many issues. 
Strukturno in finančno je neodvisna od Evropske komisije, vendar z njo sodeluje pri številnih vprašanjih.
02 On its creation in January 2011, the EEAS took over responsibility for all EU delegations from the European Commission. 
02 Ob ustanovitvi januarja 2011 je ESZD od Evropske komisije prevzela odgovornost za vse delegacije EU.
As a consequence, delegation buildings that are currently occupied are largely the result of past European Commission decisions. 
Zato so stavbe delegacij, ki se trenutno uporabljajo, večinoma rezultat preteklih odločitev Evropske komisije.
The EEAS provides office space for 5 300 staff in around 140 delegations. 
ESZD zagotavlja pisarniške prostore za 5 300 zaposlenih v približno 140 delegacijah.
The EEAS is also responsible for the residences of heads of delegation and for providing or reimbursing the costs of accommodation for 2 400 staff. 
Odgovorna je tudi za rezidence vodij delegacij ter plačilo ali povračilo stroškov za stanovanja 2 400 zaposlenih.
03 The effective management of EU delegation buildings contributes to achieving the EU’s objectives in foreign policy, trade and development cooperation. 
03 Učinkovito upravljanje stavb delegacij EU prispeva k doseganju ciljev EU na področju zunanje politike, trgovine in razvojnega sodelovanja.
Delegation offices aim to provide a stable, visible, functional and secure working and meeting environment for staff and visitors. 
Pisarne delegacij naj bi zagotavljale stabilno, prepoznavno, funkcionalno in varno delovno okolje in okolje za sestanke zaposlenim in obiskovalcem.
Buildings should provide value for money, and sharing office premises with Member States or other EU institutions and bodies is actively promoted. 
Stavbe bi morale biti stroškovno učinkovite, aktivno pa se spodbuja souporaba pisarniških prostorov z državami članicami ali drugimi institucijami in organi EU.
04 Some 80 % of delegation office buildings and residences of heads of delegation are rented, the rest are owned. 
04 Približno 80 % pisarniških stavb delegacij in rezidenc vodij delegacij je naje-tih, druge so lastniške.
EEAS expenditure on delegation buildings in 2014 amounted to 165 million euro (see Figure 1). 
Odhodki ESZD za stavbe delegacij so v letu 2014 znašali 165 milijonov EUR (glej sliko 1).
Introduction 09 2014 expenditure on delegation buildings 165 million euro Offices 53 million euro Residences - 11 million euro Staff accommodation 62 million euro Security costs 26 million euro — 16 % Water, gas, electricity, insurance — 3 % Cleaning and maintenance — 2 % Major repairs/fitting out — 2 % Purchase/construction of buildings — 1 % Source: EEAS. Rents or reimbursements of rents 126 million euro — 76 % Figure 1 
Uvod 09 Odhodki za stavbe delegacij v letu 2014 – 165 milijonov EUR stroški za varnost 26 milijonov EUR – 16 % voda, plin, elektrika, zavarovanje – 3 % čiščenje in vzdrževanje – 2 % večja popravila / opremljanje – 2 % nakup/izgradnja stavb – 1 % Vir: ESZD. najemnine ali nadomestila za najemnine 126 milijonov EUR – 76 % rezidence – 11 milijonov EUR pisarne 53 milijonov EUR stanovanja zaposlenih 62 milijonov EUR Slika 1
Audit scope 10 and approach Audit scope 05 The overall audit objective was to examine whether the EEAS manages delegation buildings well and the audit addressed the following sub-questions. (a) Do delegation buildings meet the needs of the EEAS and provide value for money? (b) Does the EEAS have effective procedures for selecting the right buildings? (c) Does the EEAS have effective systems for monitoring the continued suitability of buildings and planning necessary changes? 
Obseg revizije 10 in revizijski pristop Obseg revizije 05 Splošni cilj revizije je bil preučiti, ali ESZD dobro upravlja stavbe delegacij. Pri reviziji so bila obravnavana naslednja podvprašanja: (a) Ali stavbe delegacij zadostujejo potrebam ESZD in ali so stroškovno učinkovite? (b) Ali ima ESZD vzpostavljene uspešne postopke za izbiro primernih stavb? (c) Ali ima ESZD vzpostavljene uspešne sisteme za spremljanje stalne ustreznosti stavb in načrtovanje potrebnih sprememb?
Audit approach 06 We based the audit observations on four main sources of audit evidence (see Figure 2). (a) We sent a survey to heads of administration in 133 delegations1. 
Revizijski pristop 06 Revizijske ugotovitve temeljijo na štirih glavnih virih revizijskih dokazov (glej sliko 2): (a) vodjem administracije v 133 delegacijah1 smo poslali anketo.
112 heads of administration completed the survey, representing a response rate of 84 %. (b) We reviewed a sample of 30 building files submitted to headquarters in 2013 and 20142. 
Nanjo je odgovorilo 112 vodij administracije, kar pomeni 84-odstotno stopnjo odziva; (b) pregledali smo vzorec 30 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah, posredovanih sedežu v letih 2013 in 20142.
The decision to rent or buy a particular building, or whether or not to renew a lease, is taken on the basis of a building file submitted to headquarters by the delegation concerned. (c) We carried out visits to four delegations (Nepal, Tanzania, Turkey and United States — Washington DC) in order to examine building-management practices in delegations of different size, continent, space per person, ownership (three office buildings were rented), building condition, staff composition and experience of co-location. 
Odločitev o najemu ali nakupu določene stavbe ali o podaljšanju najemne pogodbe zanjo se sprejme na podlagi dokumentacije o stavbah, ki jo zadevna delegacija predloži sedežu; (c) opravili smo obiske pri štirih delegacijah (Nepal, Tanzanija, Turčija in ZDA – Washington), da bi preučili prakse upravljanja stavb v delegacijah različnih velikosti, na različnih celinah, z različno površino na osebo, različnim lastništvom (tri pisarniške stavbe so bile najete), z različnim stanjem stavb, sestavo zaposlenih in izkušnjami s kolokacijo.
During the visits to these delegations we also discussed building-management practices with heads of administration of the Member States’ embassies. 
Med obiski pri teh delegacijah smo o praksah upravljanja stavb razpravljali tudi z vodji administracij veleposlaništev držav članic.
Over the course of our visits we met with the embassies of Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. 
Med obiski smo se sestali z osebjem veleposlaništev Belgije, Danske, Finske, Nemčije, Nizozemske, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva.
We also visited the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the Netherlands to obtain further information on their innovative policies and procedures for managing embassy buildings. (d) We reviewed documentation relating to policies, procedures and tools, carried out interviews at headquarters and analysed quantitative information relating to delegation buildings. 
Obiskali smo tudi ministrstvo za zunanje zadeve na Nizozemskem, da bi pridobili nadaljnje informacije o njihovih inovativnih politikah in postopkih za upravljanje stavb veleposlaništev; (d) pregledali smo dokumentacijo o politikah, postopkih in orodjih, opravili pogovore na sedežu ESZD in analizirali kvantitativne informacije v zvezi s stavbami delegacij.
1 The survey was sent to all delegations except those located inside the EU (e.g. Delegation of the European Union to the OECD and Unesco in Paris) and those depending on another delegation. 
1 Anketa je bila poslana vsem delegacijam razen tistih znotraj EU (npr. delegacija Evropske unije v OECD in UNESCO v Parizu) in tistim, ki so odvisne od drugih delegacij.
2 The sample of 30 building files was selected using monetary unit sampling from the 148 building files submitted between January 2013 and September 2014. 
2 Vzorec 30 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah je bil izbran z metodo vzorčenja po denarni enoti iz 148 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah, predloženih med januarjem 2013 in septembrom 2014.
Audit scope and approach 11 Sources of audit evidence Review of 30 building files Audit visits to four delegations: Nepal, Tanzania, Turkey and United States Review of statistics and procedures Audit observations Audit survey Source: European Court of Auditors. Figure 2 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 11 Viri revizijskih dokazov pregled 30 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah revizijska anketa Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče. revizijska opažanja revizijski obiski štirih delegacij: Nepal, Tanzanija, Turčija in ZDA pregled statističnih podatkov in postopkov Slika 2
Observations 12 Section I — Buildings generally meet the needs of Delegations but in some cases do not provide best value for money because of excess space, unused properties and charges to tenants which do not recover full costs 07 The audit examined whether buildings meet the needs of delegations and provide value for money. 
Opažanja 12 Oddelek I – Stavbe na splošno zadostujejo potrebam delegacij, vendar zaradi odvečnega prostora, neuporabljenih nepremičnin in stroškov, ki se zaračunajo najemnikom in ne krijejo celotnih dejanskih stroškov, v nekaterih primerih niso stroškovno učinkovite 07 Pri reviziji je bilo preučeno, ali stavbe zadostujejo potrebam delegacij in ali so stroškovno učinkovite.
Buildings generally meet the needs of delegations Office buildings 08 The EEAS building policy has the following objectives for delegation offices: stability, visibility, functionality, security and best value for money. 
Stavbe na splošno zadostujejo potrebam delegacij Pisarniške stavbe 08 Stavbna politika ESZD za pisarne delegacij določa naslednje cilje: stabilnost, prepoznavnost, funkcionalnost, varnost in stroškovno učinkovitost.
The audit survey of heads of administration in delegations confirmed the relevance of all these objectives, shown in bold type in Figure 3. 
Revizijska anketa za vodje administracije v delegacijah je potrdila relevantnost vseh teh ciljev, označenih s krepkim tiskom na sliki 3.
Importance of objectives for delegation offices Accessibility for disabled — 6 % Environmental impact — 7 % Flexibility — 9 % Value for money — 12 % Visibility — 12 % Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations. Security — 22 % Functionality — 18 % Stability — 14 % Figure 3 
Pomembnost ciljev za pisarne delegacij dostopnost za invalide – 6 % okoljski vpliv – 7 % prožnost – 9 % stroškovna učinkovitost – 12 % prepoznavnost – 12 % Vir: Revizijska anketa za vodje administracije v delegacijah EU. varnost – 22 % funkcionalnost – 18 % stabilnost – 14 % Slika 3
Observations 13 09 Respondents gave the highest weighting to security and functionality, but also recognised the importance of other factors which are not currently objectives of the building policy. (a) Flexibility. The 2014 working document on the EEAS building policy stated that renting has the advantage of flexibility if needs change. 
Opažanja 13 09 Anketiranci so največjo težo namenili varnosti in funkcionalnosti, a so priznali tudi pomen drugih dejavnikov, ki trenutno ne spadajo med cilje stavbne politike: (a) prožnost: v delovnem dokumentu o stavbni politiki ESZD iz leta 2014 je navedeno, da ima najemanje prednost zaradi prožnosti v primeru, da se potrebe spremenijo.
Building needs may change, for example, as a result of an increase or decrease in staff numbers. 
Stavbne potrebe se lahko spremenijo, na primer zaradi povečanja ali zmanjšanja števila zaposlenih.
Moreover, staff numbers can be outside the direct control of the EEAS, as it provides office space for European Commission staff and for other organisations. (b) Environmental impact. Although the EEAS is determined to put in place an environmentally friendly workplace both at headquarters and in delega-tions3, its building policy does not reflect this concern. 
Poleg tega ESZD nima vedno neposrednega nadzora nad številom zaposlenih, saj zagotavlja pisarniške prostore za zaposlene Evropske komisije in za druge organizacije; (b) okoljski vpliv: čeprav je ESZD odločena, da zagotovi okolju prijazne delovne prostore na sedežu in tudi v delegacijah3, pa njena stavbna politika tega ne odraža.
For example, it has not yet committed itself to adopting EMAS (the eco-management and audit scheme)4. 
Na primer, ni se še zavezala, da bo sprejela sistem EMAS (sistem Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo)4.