natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, DG REGIO presented recent evidence of the added value of the Cohesion Policy quoting the ex post evaluations of ERDF programmes 2000-2006, the conclusions of the ‘Experts evaluation network’ on the 2007-2013 programming period and the fifth Cohesion Report (10). 8.10. 
Poleg tega je pred­ stavil novejše dokaze o dodani vrednosti kohezijske politike, pri čemer se je skliceval na naknadna vrednotenja programov ESRR iz obdobja 2000–2006, zaključke „mreže strokovnjakov za vrednotenje“ o programskem obdobju 2007–2013 in peto poročilo o koheziji (10).
DG REGIO presented the latest developments regarding the implementation of the relevant programming periods separately for the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Cohesion Fund, the pre-accession inter­ ventions and the European Union Solidarity Fund and included related performance indicators in Annex 7 to the Annual Activity Report. Research and Innovation 8.11. 
8.10 GDREGIOjenajnovejšedogajanjepriizvajanjuposa­ meznih programskih obdobij predstavil ločeno za Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR), Kohezijski sklad, predpri­ stopno pomoč in Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije ter ustrezne kazalnike smotrnosti poslovanja vključil v Prilogo 7 letnega poročila o dejavnostih.
IntheAnnualActivityReport,theDirector-General recalled the objective of the Commission and the Member States to drive forward an integrated and world-class research system in Europe. 
Raziskave in inovacije 8.11 Generalni direktor je v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih opozoril na cilj Komisije in držav članic, da v Evropi spodbudijo razvoj sistema povezanih vrhunskih razi­ skav.
The situation presented was that overall the EU scientific and technological competitiveness remained strong, accounting for 23,4 % of the world’s total research investment, 22 % of the researchers, 32,4 % of all the high impact publications and 31,3 % of all patents. 
Predstavljeno stanje kaže, da je znanstvena in tehnološka konkurenčnost EU na splošno ostala močna, saj je predstavljala 23,4 % vseh svetovnih naložb v raziskave, 22 % raziskovalcev, 32,4 % vseh vplivnejših publikacij in 31,3 % vseh patentov.
In its Annual Activity Report, the Directorate-General for Regional Policy (DG REGIO) reports performance on several aspects: budgetary execution, policy development, operational achievement linked to the quality of intervention and the implementation of the recovery package, sound financial management, etc. The operational priorities, defined in the Management Plan (MP), are one of the elements to assess performance. _____________ (9) Cohesion Policy regroups Regional Policy managed by DG REGIO and the European Social Fund managed by DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 8.8 Generalni direktorat za regionalno politiko (GD REGIO) v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih poroča o delovni uspešnosti z več vidikov: izvrševanja proračuna, razvoja politike, operativnega dosežka, povezanega s kakovostjo intervencije in izvajanjem svežnja ukrepov za oživitev gospodarstva, dobrega finančnega poslovodenja itd. Operativne prednostne naloge, določene v načrtu upravljanja, so eden od elementov za ocenjevanje delovne uspešnosti. _____________ (9) Kohezijska politika združuje regionalno politiko, ki jo upravlja GD REGIO, in Evropski socialni sklad, ki ga upravlja GD za zaposlo­ vanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje.
(10) http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/ cohesion5/index_en.cfm EN 
(10) http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/ cohesion5/index_en.cfm SL
RegardingtheSeventhFrameworkProgrammefor Research and Technological Development (FP7), the EU’s main instrument to implement and support EU research policy, DG RTD reported to have concluded a total of 38 (11) calls for proposals in 2010 and to have committed over 5,2 billion euro. 
OP), ki je glavni instrument EU za izva­ janje in podpiranje raziskovalne politike EU, je GD RTD poročal, da je v letu 2010 zaključil skupno 38 (11) razpisov za zbiranje predlogov in prevzel obveznosti za več kot 5,2 milijarde EUR.
8.13. The2010interimevaluationofFP7concludedthatit contributed to the development of European Research Area and its geographical outreach in cross-border cooperation and its promotion of research excellence continued to make a difference to the European research landscape. 
8.13 Vmesnovrednotenje7.OPvletu2010jeprišlodo zaključka, da je program prispeval k razvoju evropskega razi­ skovalnega prostora in njegovega geografskega dosega v čezmejnem sodelovanju, njegovo spodbujanje odličnosti v razi­ skavah pa je še naprej pozitivno vplivalo na področje raziskav v Evropi.
8.14. TheAnnualActivityReportalsopresentedthemain achievements for each activity and reported on objectives and related indicators in its Annex 8. 
8.14 V letnem poročilu o dejavnostih so bili predstavljeni tudi glavni dosežki za posamezne dejavnosti, v Prilogi 8 pa cilji in z njimi povezani kazalniki.
General objectives were defined at strategic policy level. 
Splošni cilji so bili dolo­ čeni na ravni strateške politike.
Their achievement was measured using impact indicators and related targets. 
Njihovo doseganje se je merilo s kazalniki učinka in z njimi povezanimi ožjimi cilji.
Specific objectives defined at operational level were linked to results indicators and targets. 
Specifični cilji, določeni na operativni ravni, so bili povezani s kazalniki rezultatov in ožjimi cilji.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S _____________ (11) This figure refers to the period from January to October 2010 (see footnote 4 of the Annual Activity Report). 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E _____________ (11) Ta številka se nanaša na obdobje od januarja do oktobra 2010 (glej sprotno opombo 4 v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih).
The Commission considers that the Annual Activity Reports (AARs) examined by the Court are in compliance with the requirements of Article 60(7) of the Financial Regulation. 
Komisija meni, da so letna poročila o dejavnostih, ki jih je pregledalo Sodišče, skladna z zahtevami iz člena 60(7) finančne uredbe.
The set of objectives, indicators and targets in the Management Plan has been designed to focus on policy or programme effectiveness. 8.15. 
Niz ciljev, kazalnikov in ožjih ciljev v načrtu upravljanja je bil obli­ kovan zaradi osredotočenosti na uspešnost politike ali programa. 8.15
EN 210 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 8.16. In the Annual Activity Reports however, the differences between the targets and the achieved results were not analysed (DG REGIO, DG RTD) or only partially (DG AGRI). 
SL 210 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 8.16 Vendar v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih razlike med ožjimi cilji in doseženimi rezultati niso bile analizirane (GD REGIO, GD RTD) ali pa so bile analizirane le delno (GD AGRI).
Thus, the information presented in the Annual Activity Reports was not sufficient to understand why a target was not achieved or significantly exceeded. 
Tako informacije, predstavljene v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih, niso zadoščale, da bi bilo mogoče razumeti, zakaj neki ožji cilj ni bil dosežen ali pa je bil močno presežen.
Currently the Management Plan does not foresee objectives and indicators to measure economy and efficiency 8.17. In the Management Plan, the DGs did not set objectives and related indicators to assess economy (costs of inputs) or efficiency (relation between inputs, outputs and results), either at the level of the EU policy, or at the level of expenditure under direct control of the DG. 
Zaenkrat v načrtu upravljanja niso predvideni cilji in kazalniki za merjenje gospodarnosti in učinkovitosti 8.17 Generalni direktorati v načrtih upravljanja niso določili ciljev in z njimi povezanih kazalnikov za ocenjevanje gospo­ darnosti (stroški vložkov) ali učinkovitosti (razmerje med vložki, izložki in rezultati) niti na ravni politike EU niti na ravni odhodkov, ki so pod neposrednim nadzorom general­ nega direktorata.
Thus, it was not possible in the Annual Activity Report to assess whether the achievements presented were the result of an economic and efficient management of resources or whether any progress had been recorded in this area. 
Zato v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih ni bilo mogoče oceniti, ali so bili predstavljeni dosežki rezultat gospo­ darnega in učinkovitega upravljanja virov in ali je bil na tem področju ugotovljen kak napredek.
The standing instructions ask the Commission services to justify any discrepancy between results achieved and planned. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 8.16 Službe Komisije so v stalnih navodilih pozvane, naj upra­ vičijo kakršno koli razhajanje med doseženimi in načrtovanimi rezul­ tati.
For some cases, although a full assessment of the differences between the targets and the achieved results was not presented, data on the current situation is provided annually showing clearly the trend towards attainment of the objectives. 
Čeprav v nekaterih primerih ni bila predstavljena popolna ocena razlik med ožjimi cilji in doseženimi rezultati, so podatki o trenutnem stanju zagotovljeni letno in jasno kažejo težnjo k doseganju ciljev.
The Commission agrees that departure of actual achievements from the planned targets could be better explained in future Annual Activity Reports, and, in the future, particular attention will be paid to further developing the analysis of the achievements against the targets set. 
Komisija se strinja, da bi se lahko odstopanje dejanskih dosežkov od načrtovanih ožjih ciljev bolje pojasnilo v prihodnjih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih, pri čemer bo v prihodnje posebna pozornost namenjena nadaljnjemu razvijanju analize dosežkov v primerjavi z določenimi cilji.
8.17. Within the implementation of Activity Based Management, the MP was the tool chosen by the Commission for its services to translate the Commission's long-term strategy into general and specific objectives. 
8.17 Pri izvajanju upravljanja po dejavnostih je Komisija svojim službam kot orodje za prenos dolgoročne strategije Komisije v splošne in specifične cilje izbrala načrt upravljanja.
Concerning the general objectives, the standing instructions invite the services to limit their number, to align them in particular with the EU 2020 Strategy and to define priorities amongst them. 
V zvezi s splošnimi cilji so službe v stalnih navodilih pozvane, naj omejijo njihovo število, jih prilagodijo zlasti strategiji EU 2020 in med njimi opredelijo prednostne naloge.
On the side of the specific objectives, services are instructed to set objectives that are aligned with the general objectives and that address the direct effect of the EU actions on the targeted population. 
Glede specifičnih ciljev je službam naročeno, naj določijo cilje, ki so usklajeni s splošnimi cilji in ki obravnavajo neposredni učinek ukrepov EU na ciljno prebivalstvo.
In conclusion, the MP focuses on policy effectiveness (the degree to which objectives are achieved). 
Tako je načrt upravljanja osredotočen na uspešnost politike (stopnjo, do katere so doseženi cilji).
On the side of the reporting, the Commission services report, in their AARs, on effectiveness, efficiency and economy aspects of their control systems, in line with Article 60(7) of the Financial Regulation. 
Službe Komisije v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih v skladu s členom 60(7) finančne uredbe glede poročanja poročajo o vidikih uspešnosti in učinkovitosti ter gospodarskih vidikih svojih sistemov kontrole.
Part 2 of the AAR focuses on the effectiveness of the internal control system while Part 3 includes key indicators on legality and regularity which are established under the format ‘inputs, outputs, results and impact’. 
Del 2 letnega poročila o dejavnostih je osredotočen na uspešnost sistema notranje kontrole, medtem ko del 3 vključuje ključne kazalnike zako­ nitosti in pravilnosti, ki so določeni v obliki „vložkov, izložkov, rezul­ tatov in učinka“.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 211 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S In some areas targets not sufficiently quantified or specific 8.18. ForDGAGRIfouroutof10targetsforimpact indicators, and for DG RTD three out of ten, were not quantified, mentioning only a trend. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 211 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A Na nekaterih področjih ožji cilji niso dovolj količinsko oprede­ ljeni ali specifični 8.18 Štirje od desetih ožjih ciljev za kazalnike učinka za GD AGRI in trije od desetih za GD RTD niso bili količinsko opre­ deljeni, ampak je bil omenjen le trend.
Explanations were not provided for the basis on which the targets were set for five impact indicators out of 10 in DG AGRI, and for four out of 10 impact indicators as well as all results indicators for coop­ eration in the different research areas in DG RTD. 
Ni bilo pojasnjeno, na podlagi česa so bili določeni ožji cilji za pet kazalnikov učinka od desetih v GD AGRI ter ožji cilji za štiri od desetih kazal­ nikov učinka in za vse kazalnike rezultatov za sodelovanje na različnih raziskovalnih področjih v GD RTD.
For DG REGIO, while the targets for impact and results indicators were quantified, most operational priorities and outputs for 2010 set in the Management Plan were not specific (12) or measurable. 
Večina opera­ tivnih prednostnih nalog in izložkov za leto 2010, določenih v načrtu upravljanja GD REGIO, ni bila specifičnih ali merljivih (12), čeprav so bili ožji cilji za kazalnike učinka in rezultatov količinsko opredeljeni.
Overall assessment was therefore difficult. 
Skupna ocena je bila zato težavna.
DG RTD’s Annual Activity Report did not clearly separate the impacts of projects financed through Framework Programme under its direct responsibility from those of its action to coordinate the research efforts of Member States under a common and coherent EU policy for research, where the Commission’s influence is indirect only. 
V letnem poročilu o dejavnostih GD RTD učinki projektov, financiranih iz okvirnega programa pod njegovo neposredno odgovornostjo, niso bili jasno ločeni od učinkov njegovih ukrepov za usklajevanje prizadevanj držav članic na področju raziskav v okviru skupne in skladne raziskovalne politike EU, na katero ima Komisija le posreden vpliv.
The Commission standing instructions do not require all indicators to be quantitative nor to explain the targets as the MP is primarily a tool for management. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 8.18 Stalna navodila Komisije ne zahtevajo, da so vsi kazalniki količinsko opredeljeni ali da pojasnjujejo ožje cilje, saj je načrt upra­ vljanja predvsem orodje za upravljanje.
Indicators need to be measurable to monitor progress towards achieving the set goals; and trends are adequate for this purpose. 
Kazalniki morajo biti merljivi, da lahko spremljajo napredek pri doseganju določenih ciljev; trendi so za ta namen ustrezni.
For DG REGIO, general and specific objectives linked to the activity-based budgeting (ABB) activities are ‘SMART’ and the definition of policy outputs is also clear. 
Za GD REGIO imajo splošni in specifični cilji, povezani z dejav­ nostmi v okviru proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti, obliko „SMART“ in tudi opredelitev izložkov politike je jasna.
DG REGIO has introduced so-called ‘operational priorities’. 
GD REGIO je uvedel t. i. „operativne prednostne naloge“.
These are aimed at introducing a management style based on a ‘systems thinking’ approach focusing on increasing quality. 
Te so namenjene uvedbi načina upra­ vljanja na podlagi pristopa „sistematičnega razmišljanja“, ki je osre­ dotočen na izboljšanje kakovosti.
As such, the focus is more on processes and progress, rather than on achieving specific outputs and targets. 
Pri tem je večji poudarek na postopkih in napredku kot na doseganju specifičnih izložkov in ožjih ciljev.
8.19. Even though the same indicators are used for several activities, the standing instructions ask the Commission services to present their objectives and indicators by ABB activity, and not consolidate information across activities. 
8.19 Čeprav se enaki kazalniki uporabljajo za več dejavnosti, so službe Komisije v stalnih navodilih pozvane, naj predstavijo svoje cilje in kazalnike za dejavnost v okviru proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti ter naj ne konsolidirajo informacij v okviru dejavnosti.
It is extremely difficult to separate the impacts according to the nature of the Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (DG RTD) intervention, since impacts refer to ultimate changes in EU society. 
Glede na značilnosti intervencije Generalnega direktorata za raziskave in inovacije (GD RTD) je zelo težko ločiti učinke, ker se nanašajo na končne spremembe v družbi EU.
These societal changes depend essentially from the action of other actors (Member States, regions, undertakings ...). 
Te družbene spremembe so odvisne predvsem od ukrepanja drugih akterjev (držav članic, regij, podjetij itd.).
8.20. For multiannual programmes it is not always meaningful to set interim milestones, as impacts will only be reached in a non-linear way at the end of the programming period. 
8.20 Za večletne programe ni vedno smiselno določiti vmesnih mejnikov, ker bodo učinki doseženi samo na nelinearen način na koncu programskega obdobja.
According to the Commission standing instructions, milestones are only needed for general objectives. 
Glede na stalna navodila Komisije so mejniki potrebni samo za splošne cilje.
The annual reporting on inputs, outputs and results, i.e. the monitoring of the progress in programme implemen­ tation, does allow for a regular assessment of the progress towards the attainment of the objectives. 
Letno poročanje o vložkih, izložkih in rezultatih, tj. spremljanje napredka pri izvajanju programa, omogoča redno ocenjevanje napredka pri doseganju ciljev.
In addition, in the area of rural development, the mid-term evaluation of the rural development programmes (RDPs) provides a further in-depth independent quantitative and qualitative view of whether programmes are on track to achieve their objectives and what adjustments might be needed. _____________ (12) Such as, for instance, operational priorities 2010 ‘1.1 To take actions to facilitate the high quality implementation of programmes by national and regional bodies’ or ‘1.2 To takes actions together with Member States and candidate countries to ensure a good absorption and use of resources’. 
Poleg tega na območju razvoja podeželja vmesno vrednotenje programov za razvoj podeželja zagotavlja nadaljnji poglobljen neod­ visen kvantitativen in kvalitativen pogled na to, ali se programi približujejo dosegi svojih ciljev, in kakšni popravki bi bili potrebni. _____________ (12) Kot na primer operativni prednostni nalogi za leto 2010: „1.1 Ukrepanje za olajšanje visokokakovostnega izvajanja programov s strani nacionalnih in regionalnih organov“ ali „1.2 Ukrepanje skupaj z državami članicami in državami kandidatkami za zagota­ vljanje dobrega črpanja in porabe sredstev“.
EN 212 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S For indicators measuring the ultimate goals of the research and innovation policy at EU level and for those of the Activity ‘ERA Development’, data are usually updated yearly but with a certain time lag of 2 or more years depending on the indicator. 
SL 212 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Za kazalnike, ki merijo končne cilje politike raziskav in inovacij na ravni EU, in za tiste iz dejavnosti „razvoja ERP“ se podatki običajno posodabljajo letno, vendar z določenim časovnim zamikom dveh ali več let, kar je odvisno od kazalnika.
The Court's suggestion to provide more explicit explanations on whether achievement of objectives is considered on track could be explored in the future. 
Predlog Sodišča, da se zagotovijo jasnejša pojasnila o tem, ali se šteje, da se bodo cilji dosegli, bi se lahko raziskal v prihodnosti.
See also reply to paragraph 8.21. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 8.21.
The pace of progress for multiannual programmes can indeed be relatively slow. The reasons are twofold: the implementation of the programmes entails initial capacity building and the required impact takes several years to gather speed. 
8.21 Napredek večletnih programov je resnično lahko sorazmerno počasen, in sicer iz dveh razlogov: izvajanje programov vključuje začetno krepitev zmogljivosti in zahtevan učinek je viden šele po več letih.
Regarding the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) support to broadband access, the 2007-2013 targets mentioned for the various result indicators will not be achieved in 7 years but at the end of the eligibility period 2 years later. 
V zvezi s podporo Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) za širokopasovni dostop ožji cilji za obdobje 2007–2013 glede različnih kazalnikov rezultata ne bodo doseženi v sedmih letih, ampak konec obdobja upravičenosti dve leti pozneje.
DG REGIO's has highlighted in key documents, all mentioned in the Annual Activity Report, the need for Member States to accelerate achievement of the EU 2020 objectives for broadband access (1). 
GD REGIO je v svojih klju­ čnih dokumentih, navedenih v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih, poudaril potrebo po tem, da države članice pospešijo doseganje ciljev EU 2020 v zvezi s širokopasovnim dostopom (1).
See also reply to point 8.20. 
Glej tudi odgovor na točko 8.20.
It is inherent to the annual nature of the annual activity report cycle that, within the multiannual period during which the policy and/or programme is being implemented, in the management part of the annual activity report the Authorising Officer by Delegation (AOD) focuses on the inputs and outputs which are under his management scope rather than already on the long term results and impacts of the policies and programmes, which can only be known at the end of the programme and which may also be influenced by other factors outside his management scope. 
8.22 Ker se letna poročila o dejavnostih pripravljajo letno, se v večletnem obdobju izvajanja politike in/ali programa odredbodajalec na podlagi prenosa v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih pri upravljanju osredotoča na vložke in izložke, ki so v njegovem obsegu upravljanja, ne pa že na dolgoročne rezultate in učinke politik ter programov, ki so lahko znani samo na koncu programa in na katere lahko vplivajo tudi drugi dejavniki zunaj njegovega obsega upravljanja.
See also reply to paragraph 8.23. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 8.23.
8.21. Formultiannualprogrammes,thestandardpaceof progress might be relatively slow, so that an achievement of less than 10 % of the target after a number of years could in certain cases be considered normal, while in other cases signal delays. 
8.21 Pri večletnih programih je morda običajno, da se napredek dosega razmeroma počasi, tako da se lahko manj kot 10-odstotna izpolnitev cilja po več letih v nekaterih primerih šteje za normalno, medtem ko v drugih pomeni zaostanek.
For example in the area of ERDF, the target for addi­ tional population covered by broadband access in six Member States was set at 10 million over 2007-2013. 
Na področju ESRR, na primer, je bil določen ožji cilj, da bo v obdobju 2007–2013 širokopasovni dostop v šestih državah članicah na voljo dodatnim 10 milijonom prebi­ valcev.
The latest known result was 550 000 for 2007-2009, representing 5,5 % of the overall target after 3 years out of 7. 
Zadnji znani rezultat je bil 550000 za obdobje 2007–2009, kar pomeni 5,5 % celotnega ožjega cilja po treh od predvidenih sedmih let.
There was no indication on whether this level was considered sufficient to reach the multiannual target. 
Nikjer ni bilo navedeno, ali je bila ta raven ocenjena kot zadostna za doseganje tega večletnega ožjega cilja.
In such instances, it will not be possible, till the very end of the period, to check whether the DGs are still on track towards the achievement of multiannual targets. 
V takšnih primerih bo šele tik pred koncem obdobja mogoče preveriti, ali so generalni direktorati še vedno na pravi poti k doseganju večletnih ciljev.