natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Concerning NoEs financed under FP6, the Commission should assess on a case-by-case basis whether past achievements, potential EU added value and prospects of self-sustainability justify further funding under FP7. 
OP, bi morala Komisija na podlagi posameznega primera oceniti, ali pretekli dosežki, možna dodana vrednost EU in možnosti za samostojnost upravičujejo nadaljnje financiranje v okviru 7.
The main reason is that the participation of the private sector in general has declined (see paragraph 55). 
Glavni razlog je, da se je udeležba zasebnega sektorja na splošno zmanjšala (glej odstavek 55).
The Court’s audit revealed cases where EU funds were far higher than the own resources committed by public bodies participating in the programme, with the possibility that EU funds simply substitute participants’ own resources (see paragraph 56). 
Sodišče je pri reviziji odkrilo primere, kjer so bila finančna sredstva EU veliko višja od lastnih sredstev, ki so jih dodelili javni organi, ki sodelujejo v programu, in obstajala je možnost, da finančna sredstva EU preprosto nadomestijo lastna sredstva udeležencev (glej odstavek 56).
FP6 sought to take SMEs particular needs into account and set for this purpose a target of at least 15 % of the total budget of the thematic priorities (like in the current FP7). 
OP se je skušalo upoštevati posebne potrebe MSP, zato je bil pri njem določen končni cilj vsaj 15 % skupnega proračuna za tematske prednostne naloge (tako kot v tekočem 7.
Although, when compared to FP5, more SMEs were involved in RTD projects, the Community contribution allocated to SMEs in the thematic priorities was limited to 10 % (against 12 % in FP5). 
OP). OP v projektih RTR sodelovalo več MSP, je bil prispevek Skupnosti, ki je bil v okviru tematskih prednostnih nalog dodeljen MSP, omejen na 10 % (v primerjavi z 12 % pri 5.
FP7 first results show a further decline (see paragraphs 39 to 40). Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
OP kažejo nadaljnje upadanje (glej odstavka 39 do 40). Posebno poročilo št. 8/2009 – „Mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje?
The Court observes that FP6 has not stimulated a significant increase in terms of participants’ RTD investment, in a context where the European Council has set the objective of reaching RTD investments in the EU equivalent to 3 % of gross domestic product, two thirds of which should come from the private sector. 
Sodišče opaža, da 6. OP ni spodbudil bistvenega povečanja naložb udeležencev v RTR, v kontekstu cilja, ki ga je določil Evropski svet, da naložbe v RTR v EU dosežejo vrednost, enakovredno 3 % bruto domačega proizvoda, od česar bi morali dve tretjini priti iz zasebnega sektorja.
32 RECOMMENDATION NO 3 EXAMINE THE REASONS FOR A LOW INVESTMENT LEVEL The Commission should examine the various reasons (specific to the Framework Programme or external to it) underlying the relatively low level of participants’ RTD investment compared to the goals pursued and propose specific measures. 
32 PRIPOROČILO ŠT. 3 PREUČITI RAZLOGE ZA NIZKO STOPNJO NALOŽB Komisija bi morala preučiti različne razloge (lastne okvirnemu programu ali zunaj njega), povezane z relativno nizko stopnjo naložb udeležencev v RTR, v primerjavi z zastavljenimi ožjimi cilji, in predlagati posebne ukrepe.
Appropriate data should be made available to monitor the catalytic effect of EU RTD funding on the investments undertaken. 
Na razpolago bi bilo treba dati ustrezne podatke za spremljanje pospeševalnega učinka financiranja prevzetih naložb EU v RTR.
The realism of expected targets, in particular for SMEs and the private sector, should be reassessed. 
Ponovno bi bilo treba oceniti stvarnost predvidenih končnih ciljev, zlasti za MSP in zasebni sektor.
The Commission’s management has a decisive role in ensuring success and making schemes attractive to potential participants. 
Komisijino upravljanje ima odločilno vlogo pri zagotavljanju uspeha in privlačni predstavitvi shem morebitnim udeležencem.
Manageable structures, clarity of objectives, rapid and straightforward procedures, and project monitoring are all determinants of the Framework Programme’s effectiveness. 
Obvladljive strukture, jasni cilji, hitri in enostavni postopki ter ustrezno spremljanje projekta so vsi odločilni dejavniki za uspešnost okvirnega programa.
The Court’s audit highlighted a number of issues which affected the effectiveness of the actions funded by FP6. 
Sodišče je z revizijo ugotovilo številne težave, ki so vplivale na uspešnost dejavnosti, financiranih iz 6.
These concern in particular the uncertainty about the instruments’ specific role, the multiplicity of legal provisions with guidance not always sufficient, a negotiation process that is increasingly long and often not transparent, the rather large number of participants/grant and weaknesses in project monitoring (see paragraphs 44 to 53). 
OP. Te težave zadevajo zlasti negotovost glede posebne vloge instrumentov, številne zakonske določbe z občasno pomanjkljivimi navodili, vse daljši in pogosto nepregleden postopek pogajanj, precej visoko število udeležencev/donacij in slabosti pri spremljanju projekta (glej odstavke 44 do 53).
Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III. 
Posebno poročilo št. 8/2009 – „Mreže odličnosti“ in „integrirani projekti“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje? POVZETEK III.
The Commission welcomes the Court’s conclusion on the success achieved by the FP6 instruments audited. (i) The FPs have always been based on a sound intervention logic (in FP7 it is made more explicit). 
Komisija izraža zadovoljstvo ob ugotovitvi Sodišča, da je bil z revidiranima instrumentoma 6. okvirnega programa (OP) dosežen uspeh. (i) Okvirni programi so vedno temeljili na dobro premišljeni logiki posega (v 7.
It is challenging, in particular given the inherent uncertainty of research results, to ensure all objectives fit precisely within the strict definitions of ‘SMART’ criteria. 
Poseben izziv je zagotoviti, zlasti zaradi negotovosti rezultatov raziskav, da vsi cilji natančno ustrezajo strogim opredelitvam meril SMART.
And yet, essential aspects of the ‘SMART’ rationale were accommodated in all research-related legislative and implementation acts as can be evidenced e.g. by the existence of ‘objectives’ in the FP6 thematic priorities, despite the fact that this approach was not explicit in the Financial Regulation applicable at the moment of the FP6 preparation and adoption. 
Pa vendar so se bistveni vidiki načel SMART upoštevali v vseh z raziskavami povezanih zakonodajnih in izvedbenih aktih, kot dokazuje na primer obstoj „ciljev“ tematskih prednostnih področij 6. OP, čeprav tak pristop ni bil izrecno določen v finančni uredbi, ki se je uporabljala ob pripravi in sprejetju 6.
Under FP7, all work programmes contain expected impact statements, which correspond with the objectives, rationale and activities set out in the Specific Programmes. (ii) The Commission believes that some ‘Networks of Excellence’ have been less successful than others but several NoEs reached self-sustained integration. 
OP. Vsi delovni programi v okviru 7. OP vsebujejo izjave o pričakovanem učinku, ki ustrezajo ciljem, načelom in dejavnostim iz posebnih programov. (ii) Komisija verjame, da so bile nekatere „mreže odličnosti“ manj uspešne od drugih, vendar je več mrež odličnosti doseglo samostojno povezovanje.
This is normal given the wide range of areas covered, the various participants in dozens of different projects and the realities of collaboration in consortia. 
To ni nič nenavadnega glede na širok razpon zajetih področij, raznolikost udeležencev v številnih različnih projektih in stvarnost sodelovanja v konzorcijih.
On their side, the IPs were, by common admission, quite successful, for example, in the areas of energy and transport industrially led demonstration IPs. 
Po drugi strani pa se v zvezi z integriranimi projekti na splošno priznava, da so bili dokaj uspešni, na primer sektorsko vodeni pred-stavitveni integrirani projekti na področjih energije in prometa.
Many projects have led to market deployment and replication after the successful end of the FP6 contracts. 
Številni projekti so po uspešno izpeljanih pogodbah 6.
35 (iii) The Commission considers that its management of the FP6 instruments has played an important role in ensuring the success achieved by these instruments. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE KOMISIJE 35 (iii) Komisija meni, da je z upravljanjem instrumentov 6.
The Commission has actively sought to address any problems encountered, within the constraints imposed by the existing legislative framework. 
V okviru omejitev, določenih z veljavnim zakonodajnim okvirom, si je dejavno prizadevala za rešitev morebitnih težav.
Draft guidance documents were actually available even before the launch of FP6. (iv) FP6 alone (with its two new instruments, the IPs and NoEs) is not the panacea for the challenges facing the European research landscape, especially since it made up only 5 % of the overall European funding for research. 
Osnutki smernic so bili dejansko na voljo že pred začetkom 6. OP. (iv) 6. OP kot tak (s svojima dvema novima instru-mentoma, integriranimi projekti in mrežami odličnosti) ni univerzalni odgovor na izzive, s katerimi se srečuje evropsko raziskovalno področje, zlasti ker je vseboval samo 5 % vseh evropskih sredstev za raziskave.
Moreover, at a moment when thousands of projects financed by it continue their course, it is too early to make conclusive comparisons with FP5. 
Poleg tega je v trenutku, ko se na tisoče projektov, ki jih je financiral, še vedno izvaja, še prezgodaj za dokončne primerjave s 5.
Further, the Commission believes that FP6 has provided a significant boost to research efforts and that the achievements of FP6 have been substantial. 
OP. Komisija tudi meni, da je 6. OP bistveno spodbudil raziskovalna prizadevanja in da so bili dosežki 6.
The Commission acknowledges the Court’s findings as regards the participation of the private sector and would like to add that when taking into account public and private organisations engaged in commercial activities (the business enterprise sector) participation rates are similar to those of FP5. 
Komisija se strinja z ugotovitvami Sodišča v zvezi z udeležbo zasebnega sektorja in želi dodati, da je ob upoštevanju javnih in zasebnih organizacij, ki se ukvarjajo s poslovnimi dejavnostmi (poslovno-podjetniški sektor), stopnja udeležbe podobna kot pri 5.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION IV. 
OP. ODGOVORI KOMISIJE IV.
The FPs have always been based on a sound intervention logic which has allowed effective evaluation and monitoring. 
Okvirni programi so vedno temeljili na dobro premišljeni logiki posega, kar je omogočilo učinkovito ocenjevanje in spremljanje.
In FP7, the intervention logic is made more explicit, together with the objectives and performance measures that will help further strengthen the evaluation and monitoring system. 
OP je logika posega še jasnejša, skupaj s cilji in ukrepi za povečanje učinkovitosti, ki bodo pripomogli k dodatni okrepitvi sistema ocenjevanja in spremljanja.
In FP7, research goals and research policy objectives are clearly and explicitly set in the work programmes. 
Cilji raziskav in raziskovalne politike so v 7. OP jasno in izrecno določeni v delovnih programih.
For each topic, the scientific goals, the scope of activities and indications on the results expected are defined. 
Za vsako temo so opredeljeni znanstveni cilji, obseg dejavnosti in pričakovani rezultati.
V. (i) The Commission has evaluated IPs and NoEs through various studies and reports. 
V. (i) Komisija je integrirane projekte in mreže odličnosti ocenila z različnimi študijami in poročili.
With regard to a continued funding of FP6 NoEs under FP7, the Commission reached a similar conclusion to the Court. (ii) The Commission is constantly examining the research landscape, monitors the national R & D policies and is actively engaged in endeavours to further research investments through, not least, the open method of coordination. (iii) The Commission agrees that clear and timely guidance, a speedier contracting process and better project monitoring are very important. 
V zvezi z nadaljnjim financiranjem mrež odličnosti iz 6. OP v okviru 7. OP je prišla do podobne ugotovitve kot Sodišče. (ii) Komisija nenehno proučuje raziskovalno področje, spremlja nacionalne raziskovalne in razvojne politike ter dejavno sodeluje pri prizadevanjih za nadaljnje spodbujanje naložb v raziskave, med drugim tudi prek odprte metode usklajevanja. (iii) Komisija se strinja, da so jasna in pravočasna navodila, hitrejši postopek oddaje naročil in boljše spremljanje projekta zelo pomembni.
The Commission carries out its obligations while it constantly has to balance between two goals that are difficult to reconcile, namely the speediness of disbursement of funds and the need to ensure their accountable distribution to contractors, all in the context of the given legislative environment. 
Komisija izvaja svoje obveznosti, pri tem pa mora nenehno uravnavati dva cilja, ki ju je težko uskladiti, in sicer hitrost izplačevanja sredstev in potrebo po zagotovitvi njihove odgovorne razdelitve izvajalcem, vse v okviru danega zakonodajnega okolja.
36 INTRODUCTION 10. 
36 UVOD 10.
FP6 was meant to encourage the participation of SMEs in all areas and all instruments, in particular in the context of the activities carried out in the priority thematic areas. 
S 6. OP naj bi se spodbujala udeležba MSP na vseh področjih in pri vseh instrumentih, zlasti pri dejavnostih, ki se izvajajo na tematskih prednostnih področjih.
A lower success rate for proposals under FP6 than under FP5 is attributed to the higher subscription rates under FP6. 
Nižja stopnja uspešnosti predlogov v okviru 6. OP kot v okviru 5. OP se lahko pripiše višjim stopnjam prijav v okviru 6.
Subscription rates depend on a number of complex factors, among others the degree of detail of the calls for proposals, the funds available and the evaluation approach. 
Stopnje prijav so odvisne od številnih zapletenih dejavnikov, med drugim od ravni podrobnosti razpisov za zbiranje predlogov, razpoložljivih sredstev in ocenjevalskega pristopa.
In its response to a previous audit of the Court1, the Commission maintained that the FPs have always been based on a sound intervention logic, which has been articulated as per the Treaty’s provisions in the various legislative and implementation acts. 
Komisija je v odgovor na prejšnjo revizijo Sodišča1 navedla, da so okvirni programi vedno temeljili na dobro premišljeni logiki posega, ki se je v skladu z določbami Pogodbe izražala v različnih zakonodajnih in izvedbenih aktih.
In FP7 this is made more explicit, which will further strengthen the Commission’s monitoring and evaluation. 
OP je to še izrazitejše, kar bo dodatno okrepilo spremljanje in ocenjevanje, ki ju izvaja Komisija.
Under FP7, which was developed on the basis of a detailed ex ante impact assessment, all work programmes contain expected impact statements, which correspond with the objectives, rationale and activities set out in the Specific Programmes. 
OP, ki je bil pripravljen na podlagi podrobne predhodne ocene učinka, vsi delovni programi vsebujejo izjave o pričakovanem učinku, ki ustrezajo ciljem, načelom in dejavnostim iz posebnih programov.
1 See the Commission’s replies to Special Report No 9/2007. 
1 Glej odgovore Komisije na Posebno poročilo št. 9/2007.
The Commission considers that the high overall satisfaction with the two instruments (NoEs and IPs) expressed by the participants in the Court’s survey is very positive. 
Komisija meni, da je visoko splošno zadovoljstvo z obema instrumentoma (mrežami odličnosti in integriranimi projekti), ki so ga udeleženci izrazili v anketi Sodišča, zelo pozitivno.
Given the different scope and profile of the two instruments, it is normal that private partners found in particular IPs more suitable to fit their needs. 
Glede na različen obseg in značilnosti obeh instrumentov ni nič nenava-dnega, da so se zasebnim partnerjem zdeli zlasti integrirani projekti primernejši glede na njihove potrebe.
As proposals correspond to ‘expectations’ and projects to reality, and as the implementation of projects can result in unexpected difficulties, it is not surprising that the evaluation of some projects could be less positive than the evaluation of the proposals they stemmed from. 
Ker se predlogi navezujejo na „pričakovanja“, projekti pa na stvarnost, in ker se lahko med izvajanjem projektov pojavijo nepričakovane težave, ni presenetljivo, da je bila lahko ocena nekaterih projektov manj pozitivna, kot je bila ocena predlogov, na katerih so temeljili.
The Commission notes that, according to Figure 5, the overall assessment of the projects’ quality showed them to be ‘acceptable’ and ‘good to excellent’ with a percentage of above 80 %, which suggests that participants adequately allocated their research capacities to the network. 
Komisija opozarja, da je iz diagrama 5 razvidno, da so po skupni oceni kakovosti projektov ti v več kot 80 % „sprejemljivi“ in „dobri do odlični“, kar kaže na to, da so udeleženci svoje raziskovalne zmogljivosti ustrezno namenili za mrežo.
One of the most important aspects of these new instruments, repeatedly brought forward in various guidance documents, was the enhanced role of the consortia themselves (and, in particular, of the coordinators) concerning the internal management of the project. 
Eden od najpomembnejših vidikov teh novih instrumentov, ki se je večkrat poudarjal v različnih smernicah, je bila okrepljena vloga samih konzorcijev (in zlasti koordinatorjev) pri notranjem upravljanju projekta.
It could be too soon to reach a definitive conclusion on how and/or if the objective of ‘self-sustainable long-term research activities and partnerships’ has been reached. 
Morda je še prezgodaj za dokončen sklep o tem, kako oziroma ali je bil dosežen cilj „samoza-dostnosti dolgoročnih raziskovalnih dejavnosti in partnerstev“.
37 The Commission notes that the behaviour of the NoEs has been variable across the Framework Programme. 
Komisija opozarja, da je bilo delovanje mrež odličnosti znotraj okvirnega programa različno.
In some thematic priorities such as IST and NMP, NoEs tend to reach greater degrees of sustainable development than in others2. 
Na nekaterih tematskih prednostnih področjih, kot sta IST in NMP, mreže odličnosti navadno dosegajo višje stopnje trajnostnega razvoja kot na drugih2.
The Commission notes the Court’s own statement that almost two thirds of NoEs achieved full restructuring of activities and integration between partners, which is a considerable proportion. 
Komisija opozarja na ugotovitev Sodišča, da sta skoraj dve tretjini mrež odličnosti dosegli polno preoblikovanje dejavnosti in povezovanje med partnerji, kar je precejšen delež.
Certain circumstances may have hindered participants from working together more effectively. 
Nekatere okoliščine so udeležence morda ovirale pri učinkovitejšem sodelovanju.
This is a normal trait, inextricably linked to the nature of collaboration between various actors with complementary yet different individual research goals. 
To je nekaj povsem običajnega in je neločljivo povezano z naravo sodelovanja med različnimi akterji, katerih individualni raziskovalni cilji se dopolnjujejo, a so vendarle različni.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 40. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 40.
Concerning FP7, it is still too early in the course of this seven-year long FP to suggest any final judgment on the SMEs’ participation. 
OP, je v tem sedemletnem okvirnem programu še prezgodaj, da bi domnevali o kakršni koli dokončni oceni o udeležbi MSP.
The Commission agrees about the difficulties related to the SME participation under FP6. 
Komisija se strinja glede težav, povezanih z udeležbo MSP v okviru 6.
These issues have been addressed in FP7. 
Te težave so odpravljene v 7.
In addition, on top of the funding provided following calls for proposals, FP7 supports the Eurostars Joint Programme for SMEs based on Article 169 of the Treaty by up to 100 million euro. 
Še več, poleg financiranja, zagotovljenega na podlagi razpisov za zbiranje predlogov, se v 7. OP do 100 milijonov EUR namenja skupnemu programu za MSP, imenovanemu Eurostars, ki temelji na členu 169 Pogodbe.
The programme is jointly undertaken by Eureka countries, supporting transnational projects initiated and led by R & D performing SMEs. 
Program skupaj izvajajo države EUREKA, namenjen pa je podpori nadnacionalnih projektov, ki jih začnejo in vodijo MSP, ki se ukvarjajo z raziskavami in razvojem.
Eurostars is expected to contribute to building the European Research Area by integrating the participating national programmes into a joint programme at European level. 
Eurostars naj bi pripomogel k oblikovanju evropskega raziskovalnega prostora, in sicer s povezovanjem sodelujočih nacionalnih programov v skupen program na evropski ravni.
The Commission considers that the Court’s conclusion that the FP6 instruments audited had promoted effective research collaboration between project participants (see paragraph 58) reflects well on the Commission’s overall management of these instruments. 
Komisija meni, da ugotovitev Sodišča, da sta revidirana instrumenta 6. OP spodbujala uspešno raziskovalno sodelovanje med udeleženci projekta (glej odstavek 58), kaže na to, da je Komisija na splošno dobro upravljala te instrumente.
The Commission has actively sought to address any problems encountered, within the constraints imposed by the existing legislative framework, and continues to do so under FP7. 35. 
Komisija si je v okviru omejitev, določenih z veljavnim zakonodajnim okvirom, dejavno prizadevala za rešitev morebitnih težav in to nadaljuje tudi v okviru 7.
The Commission provided guidance material to the actors involved in order to facilitate their understanding of the new instruments. 
Komisija je sodelujočim akterjem zagotovila smernice za lažje razumevanje novih instrumentov.
A very high percentage of coordinators and participants in the survey apparently did understand the distinction between the two instruments (see the Court’s Figure 7). 
Zelo visok odstotek koordinatorjev in sodelujočih v anketi je očitno vendarle razumel razliko med obema instrumentoma (glej diagram 7 Sodišča).
It is also to be expected that coordinators would have a better understanding of these than other participants. 
Pričakovalo bi se tudi, da jo bodo koordinatorji razumeli bolje kot drugi udeleženci.
The European research community by and large understood and used well the new instruments, as evidenced by Figure 7 itself. 
Kot je razvidno že iz diagrama 7, je evropska raziskovalna skupnost nova instrumenta v glavnem razumela in pravilno uporabljala.
The Commission implemented the FP in the best possible manner to ensure compliance with the different applicable provisions. 
Komisija je okvirni program izvajala kar naj-bolje, da bi zagotovila skladnost z različnimi veljavnimi določbami.
The Commission has acted as quickly as possible given the late adoption of the FP6 legal acts by the legislators. 
Glede na to, da sta zakonodajalca pravne akte 6. OP sprejela z zamudo, je Komisija ukrepala kar se da hitro.
Detailed brochures and ‘Provisions for implementing’ for all the instruments were already available in November 2002, well before the production of the model contracts. 
Že novembra 2002, precej pred pripravo modelov pogodb, so bile za vse instrumente na voljo podrobne zloženke in „določbe za izvajanje“.
A large number of guidance documents have been produced and published on the internet. 
Pripravljene so bile številne smernice, ki so bile objavljene na internetu.
Additionally, targeted events for coordinators, to which all projects have been invited, addressed in particular any questions they might have had on the specificities of the instruments. 
Poleg tega so se na ciljno usmerjenih dogodkih za koordinatorje, na katere so bili vabljeni vsi projekti, obravnavala zlasti vprašanja, ki bi jih morda imeli v zvezi s posebnostmi instrumentov.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 49. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 49.