natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The increase in capacity was artificially created to obtain the higher aid rate of 625 euros/tonne for a quantity of at least 21 500 tonnes. 
Povečanje zmogljivosti je bilo umetno ustvarjeno zaradi pridobitve višje stopnje pomoči v znesku 625 EUR na tono za vsaj 21 500 ton.
In addition, the 10 % of this aid was paid to growers who had never delivered sugar beet to the dismantled facility. 
Poleg tega je bilo 10 % te pomoči izplačanih pridelovalcem, ki niso nikoli dobavljali sladkorne pese odstranjenemu obratu.
Example 3.3 EU rules provide that the competent authority of the Member State decides on the eligibilty of each application for restructuring aid. 
Primer 3.3 Predpisi EU določajo, da pristojni organ države članice odloča glede upravičenosti posameznega zahtevka za pomoč za prestrukturiranje.
In the framework of the restructuring plan of the producer referred to by the Court, it was agreed that a quantity of sugar production would be renounced and that this would be managed via full dismantlement of one production site with quota renunciation on a further three sites. 
V okviru načrta proizvajalca za prestrukturiranje, na katerega se sklicuje Sodišče, je bilo dogovorjeno, da se opusti količina proizvodnje sladkorja in da se to izvede prek popolne odstranitve enega proizvodnega obrata z opustitvijo kvot za dodatne tri obrate.
EU rules further provide that restructuring plans submitted by applicants must specify for each factory concerned the amount of quota to be renounced, ‘which shall be lower than or equal to the production capacity’ to be fully or partially dismantled. 
Predpisi EU nadalje določajo, da morajo načrti za prestrukturiranje, ki jih predložijo vlagatelji zahtevka, za vsako zadevno tovarno natančno določati količino kvote, ki se opusti, pri čemer je ta „nižja od ali enaka proizvodni zmogljivosti“, ki se v celoti ali delno odstrani.
The rules do not specify how the production capacity has to be established and Member States are therefore in principle free to determine which is the most appropriate method. 
Predpisi ne določajo načina opredelitve proizvodne zmogljivosti, zato so države članice načeloma svobodne pri določanju najprimernejše metode.
The French authorities have confirmed that the methodology used was to determine the production capacity of a factory, not its effective production at a given moment in time. 
Francoski organi so potrdili, da je bil namen uporabljene metodologije določiti proizvodno zmogljivost tovarne in ne njene učinkovite proizvodnje v danem trenutku.
However, the Commission is pursuing the case in the context of an ongoing conformity clearance procedure with a view to determining if EU rules have been fully respected. 
Vendar Komisija obravnava primer v okviru obstoječega postopka potrditve skladnosti, da bi ugotovila, ali so bili predpisi EU v celoti upoštevani.
EAFRD 3.34. Administrativechecksconcernthecorrectnessofthe declarations made by the claimant and the fulfilment of the eligibility requirements for the granting and the payment of the aid(31). 
EKSRP 3.34 Administrativni pregledi se nanašajo na pravilnost prijav vlagateljev in izpolnjevanje zahtev za upravičenost do odobritve in izplačila pomoči (31).
Such controls include cross-checks with data already available to the administration, for example in the IACS databases. _____________ (30) These failures had only a limited impact in the Netherlands and the Dutch authorities have taken adequate remedial action as of claim year 2010. 
Te kontrole obsegajo navz­ križna preverjanja s podatki, ki so organom že na voljo, na primer v podatkovnih zbirkah IAKS. _____________ (30) Te opustitve so imele na Nizozemskem le omejen učinek in nizo­ zemski organi so v letu vložitve zahtevkov 2010 sprejeli ustrezne popravne ukrepe.
(31) For rural development measures under the 2007-2013 programming period, the detailed requirements for administrative checks are defined by Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006. 
(31) Natančne zahteve za administrativne preglede za ukrepe za razvoj podeželja v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 so opredeljene v Uredbi (ES) št. 1975/2006.
10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 85 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.35. Oneofthekeyadministrativechecksofmeasures(32) for improving the competitiveness of the agricultural sector, such as modernisation of farms, and improvement and devel­ opment of rural infrastructure, aims to assess the reason­ ableness of the costs claimed. 
10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 85 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.35 Cilj enega od ključnih administrativnih pregledov ukrepov (32) za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti v kmetijskem sektorju, kot sta posodabljanje kmetij ter izboljšanje in razvoj infrastrukture na podeželju, je ocena razumnosti prijavljenih stroškov.
Member States are therefore required to implement suitable systems for evaluating the amounts claimed by beneficiaries. 
Zato morajo države članice uporabljati ustrezne sisteme za ocenjevanje zneskov, ki so jih prijavili upravičenci.
The Court found that this regulatory requirement was not effectively implemented by four of the seven national authorities audited for this aspect. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da te zakonske obveznosti niso uspešno izvajali štirje od sedmih nacionalnih organov, pri katerih je bil revidiran ta vidik.
ForsomeEAFRDprojectstheadministrativechecks shall include a verification of the compliance of the operation with applicable national and EU rules including public procurement. 
3.36 ZanekatereprojekteEKSRPadministrativnipregledi zajemajo preverjanje skladnosti delovanja z veljavnimi nacio­ nalnimi pravili in pravili EU, vključno z javnimi naročili.
The Court found that, in Portugal, the costs related to the construction of a dam had been split over several contracts which could thus be awarded directly instead of being put out to tender. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so bili na Portugalskem stroški, pove­ zani z gradnjo jezu, razdeljeni na več pogodb, ki jih je bilo tako mogoče dodeliti neposredno, brez javnega razpisa.
This was not detected by the administrative checks. 
Pri administrativnih pregledih to ni bilo ugotovljeno.
(II) Control systems based on on-the spot checks 3.37. MemberStatesmust,eachyear,carryouton-the-spot checks covering, for most aid schemes, at least 5 % of all beneficiaries (33). 
(II) Kontrolni sistemi, ki temeljijo na pregledih na kraju samem 3.37 Države članice morajo vsako leto izvesti preglede na kraju samem, ki morajo pri večini shem pomoči zajeti vsaj 5 % upravičencev (33).
The Court’s audit focussed on the adequacy of risk analysis procedures to select beneficiaries for such checks, the quality of the checks and the adequacy of the corrections made. 3.38. 
Revizija Sodišča je bila osredotočena na ustreznost postopkov analize tveganja za izbiro upravičencev, zajetih v preglede, kakovost pregledov in ustreznost opra­ vljenih popravkov.
Whenre-performingon-the-spotcheckscarriedout by paying agencies, the Court frequently found that controls have not been properly executed (see example 3.4). 
3.38 Sodišče je pri ponovitvi pregledov na kraju samem, ki so jih opravile plačilne agencije, pogosto ugotovilo, da se kontrole niso pravilno izvrševale (glej primer 3.4).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.35. The Commission shares the view that administrative checks of the reasonableness of costs are essential for ensuring the effec­ tiveness of the whole control system. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.35 Komisija se strinja, da so administrativni pregledi razum­ nosti stroškov nujni za zagotovitev uspešnosti celotnega kontrolnega sistema.
These essential checks are systematically examined during Commission audit missions. 
Komisija te nujne preglede sistematično prouči med revizij­ skimi misijami.
The overall assessment is that, with two exceptions, effective or partially effective systems are in place in the Member States audited by the Commission. 
Splošna ocena je, da so države članice, ki jih je revidirala Komisija, z dvema izjemama, vzpostavile uspešne ali delno uspešne sisteme.
3.36. The Commission will pursue this case through the conformity clearance procedure. 
3.36 Komisija bo ta primer obravnavala v okviru postopka potr­ ditve skladnosti.
Example 3.4 In Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands the Court re-performed parcel measurements carried out by national inspectors. 
Primer 3.4 Sodišče je v Bolgariji, Grčiji, Romuniji, na Češkem in Nizozemskem ponovilo meritve parcel, ki so jih opravili nacionalni inšpektorji.
The eligible areas reported by the national inspectors were found to be incorrect for 13 out of 43 parcels in Bulgaria, 6 out of 32 parcels in Greece, 12 out of 29 parcels in Romania, 35 out of 67 parcels in the Czech Republic and 16 out of 174 parcels in the Netherlands. 
Ugotovilo je, da so bile upravičene površine, ki so jih navedli nacionalni inšpektorji, nepravilne pri 13 od 43 parcel v Bolgariji, 6 od 32 parcel v Grčiji, 12 od 29 parcel v Romuniji, 35 od 67 parcel na Češkem in 16 od 174 parcel na Nizozemskem.
However, in the cases examined the financial effects were limited. 
Vendar so bili finančni učinki v pregledanih primerih omejeni.
Example 3.4 For Greece the problem is limited to the issue of pasture areas and this issue is followed up under the conformity clearance procedure. 3.39. 
Primer 3.4 V zvezi z Grčijo je ta težava omejena na vprašanje pašnih površin, ki se obravnava v okviru postopka potrditve skladnosti.
In EAFRD, the Court found weaknesses in the planning of the on-the-spot checks and the analysis of the results. 
3.39 Za EKSRP je Sodišče ugotovilo slabosti pri načrtovanju pregledov na kraju samem in analizi rezultatov.
In Portugal, for instance, almost all checks (97,5 %) were carried out with considerable delays, e.g. 1 or even 2 years after the year for which the payment was claimed, which makes it harder to detect cases of non-compliance. _____________ (32) Referred to in Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006. 
Na primer, na Portugalskem so bili skoraj vsi pregledi (97,5 %) izvedeni z znatno zamudo, npr. eno ali celo dve leti po letu, za katero je bilo zahtevano plačilo, zaradi česar je pri njih težje ugotoviti primere neskladnosti. _____________ (32) Navedeno v naslovu II Uredbe (ES) št. 1975/2006.
(33) Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 and Article 30 of 3.39. The Commission discovered the same weaknesses during their audits in Portugal. 
(33) Člen 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 1975/2006 in člen 30 Uredbe (ES) 3.39 Komisija je med izvajanjem revizij na Portugalskem odkrila enake slabosti.
However, the Portuguese authorities have provided the Commission with information showing that for claim year 2010 the situation has greatly improved and that the vast majority of controls was completed by December 2010. 
Vendar so portugalski organi predložili Komisiji infor­ macije, ki dokazujejo, da so se razmere za leto vložitve zahtevkov 2010 bistveno izboljšale in da se je velika večina kontrol zaključila do decembra 2010. št.
Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009. EN 
1122/2009. SL
EN 86 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S (III) System to ensure implementation and control of cross compliance 3.40. CrosscompliancerequirementsconsistofStatutory Management Requirements (SMRs) and GAEC standards (see paragraph 3.6). 
SL 86 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A (III) Sistem, ki zagotavlja izvajanje in kontroliranje navzkrižne skladnosti 3.40 Zahteve v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo so sesta­ vljene iz predpisanih zahtev ravnanja in standardov za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje (glej odstavek 3.6).
Whilst SMRs are specified in various EU Directives and regulations, GAEC standards are to be defined at national level. 
Predpisane zahteve ravnanja so določene v različnih direktivah in uredbah EU, standarde za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje pa je treba opredeliti na nacionalni ravni.
With regard to cross compliance the paying agencies must check at least 1 % of applications for direct payments. 3.41. 
Glede navzkrižne sklad­ nosti morajo plačilne agencije pregledati vsaj 1 % zahtevkov za neposredna plačila.
During its on the spot visits the Court observed, on the basis of the limited audit (see paragraph 3.16, fifth indent) cross compliance infringements in around 12% of the payments subject to cross compliance obligations. 
3.41 Sodišče je med obiski na kraju samem na podlagi omejene revizije (glej peto alineo odstavka 3.16) ugotovilo kršitve navzkrižne skladnosti pri približno 12 % plačil, za katera veljajo obveznosti navzkrižne skladnosti.
The non-compliance observed related to both SMRs (identification and registration of animals), and GAEC (encroachment of unwanted vegetation). 
Ugotovljena neskladnost se je nanašala na predpisane zahteve ravnanja (identifikacija in registracija živali) in na dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje (širitev nezaželene vegetacije).
Systems related to recoveries and financial corrections Recovery cases 3.42. TheCourtpublishedaSpecialReportontheauditof recoveries of the CAP (34) which found that the systems are now more effective in protecting the EU’s financial interests and that for cases from 2006 onwards, the recovery rates have improved. 
Sistemi v zvezi z izterjavami in finančnimi popravki Primeri izterjave 3.42 Sodišče je objavilo Posebno poročilo o reviziji izterjav v okviru SKP (34), v katerem je bilo ugotovljeno, da sistemi zdaj uspešneje ščitijo finančne interese EU in da so se stopnje izterjave za primere po letu 2006 izboljšale.
However, the systems need to be further improved by clarifying the rules, thereby reducing the scope for inter­ pretation and diverging practices adopted by the Member States. 
Vendar je treba sisteme nadalje izboljševati z razjasnitvijo pravil, da se zmanjša možnost različnih razlag in praks v državah članicah.
Aid is paid by the Member States, which are then reimbursed by the Commission (35). 
Pomoč izplačajo države članice, Komisija pa jim nato povrne sredstva(35).
The final recognition of expenditure is determined through a two-stage procedure called the clearance of accounts procedure. 
Odhodki so dokončno sprejeti v dvostopenjskem postopku, ki se imenuje postopek potrditve obračunov.
The two stages consist of an annual financial decision and multiannual conformity decisions taken by the Commission. 3.44. 
Ti stopnji sta sprejetje sklepa o letni finančni potrditvi in sprejetje večletnih odločb o sklad­ nosti, ki jih sprejme Komisija.
In previous annual reports as well as in the Special Report (36) on the audit on the clearance of accounts procedure the Court has criticised the fact that the Member States, and not the final beneficiaries, are charged with the financial corrections and that the conformity adjustments involve considerable use of flat-rate corrections which are not directly related to the real amount of irregular payments. 
3.44 Sodišče je v svojih prejšnjih letnih poročilih in v posebnem poročilu Revizija postopka potrditve obračunov (36) kritiziralo dejstvo, da finančne popravke krijejo države članice in ne končni upravičenci in da se pri popravkih zaradi sklad­ nosti veliko uporabljajo pavšalni popravki, ki niso neposredno povezani z dejanskim zneskom nepravilnih plačil.
The conformity clearance system continued unchanged in 2010. _____________ (34) Special Report No 8/2011. 
Sistem potr­ jevanja obračunov je v letu 2010 ostal nespremenjen. _____________ (34) Posebno poročilo št. 8/2011.
(35) On a monthly basis for EAGF and a quarterly basis for EAFRD. 
(35) Mesečno za EKJS in vsako četrtletje za EKSRP.
(36) Special Report No 7/2010. 
(36) Posebno poročilo št. 7/2010.
3.42. The Commission welcomes the Court’s assessment that the management and audit of recoveries of the CAP have improved over the recent years. 
3.42 Komisija izraža zadovoljstvo ob oceni Sodišča, da sta se upravljanje in revizija izterjav v okviru skupne kmetijske politike v preteklih letih izboljšala.
Regarding the recommendations expressed in the special report to further improve the system, the Commission will consider possible modifications to, where appropriate, reinforce, harmonise or clarify the relevant rules in the context of its legislative proposals for the CAP towards 2020. 3.41. 
V zvezi s priporočili v posebnem poročilu za nadaljnje izboljšanje sistema bo Komisija proučila morebitne spre­ membe, da bi, kadar je to primerno, okrepila, uskladila ali razjasnila zadevna pravila v okviru svojih zakonodajnih predlogov za skupno kmetijsko politiko proti letu 2020.
3.44. What the Court criticises in the conformity clearance system is inherent to this system. 
3.44 To, kar Sodišče kritizira v zvezi s sistemom potrjevanja skladnosti, je s sistemom neločljivo povezano.
The conformity clearance is designed to exclude expenditure from EU financing which has not been effected in compliance with EU rules. 
Namen potrditve sklad­ nosti je izvzem tistih odhodkov iz financiranja EU, ki niso bili izvršeni v skladu s predpisi EU.
In contrast, it is not a mechanism by which irregular payments to beneficiaries are recovered, which according to the principle of shared management is the sole respon­ sibility of Member States. 
Nikakor pa to ni mehanizem za izterjavo nepravilnih plačil upravičencem, kar je v skladu z načelom deljenega upravljanja v izključni pristojnosti držav članic. 3.41
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 87 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S Where undue payments to beneficiaries can be identified as a result of the conformity clearance, Member States are required to follow them up with recovery actions against these beneficiaries. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 87 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Če so bila kot rezultat potrditve skladnosti ugotovljena neupravičena plačila upravičencem, morajo države članice te upravičence nadalje spremljati in zoper njih uvesti ukrepe za izterjavo.
However, even where recoveries from beneficiaries are not needed because the financial correction relates only to deficiencies in the Member States’ management and control system and not to undue payments, these corrections are an important means to improve the Member States’ systems and thus to prevent or detect and recover irregular payments to beneficiaries. 
Vendar so ti popravki pomembno sredstvo za izboljšanje sistemov držav članic ter s tem za preprečevanje ali odkrivanje in izterjavo nepravilnih plačil upravičencem, tudi kadar izterjava od upravičencev ni potrebna, ker finančni popravki veljajo le za nepravilnosti v upravljavskem in kontrolnem sistemu držav članic ter ne za neupravičena plačila.
The use of flat rates has been accepted by the Court of Justice as being in conformity with the legal rules governing the conformity work and endorsed, under certain circumstances, by the European Parliament in its 2007 discharge resolution (§ 83). 
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je uporabo pavšalnih stopenj sprejelo kot skladno s pravnimi predpisi, ki urejajo delo na področju skladnosti, pri čemer je to uporabo pod določenimi pogoji potrdil tudi Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji o razrešnici za leto 2007 (odstavek 83).
Finally, the Commission has indicated to Member States that if their certification bodies fully re-perform a representative sample of trans­ actions which the paying agency has checked on-the-spot and, on this basis, confirm the reliability of a Member State’s control statistics, then the Commission will accept that the resulting error rate represents the maximum risk possible and that any financial corrections for the year in question will not exceed that level. 
Poleg tega je Komisija navedla, da bo, če certifikacijski organi držav članic v celoti ponovijo reprezentativni vzorec transakcij, ki jih je plačilna agencija pregledala na kraju samem, in na podlagi tega potrdijo zanesljivost kontrolnih statističnih podatkov držav članic, sprejela, da nastala stopnja napake pomeni največje možno tveganje in da kakršni koli finančni popravki za zadevno leto ne bodo presegli te ravni.
Even though the Commission agrees that, if carried out in due time, a re-performance of a previous check provides a better assessment of the quality of on-the-spot checks, it is still possible to evaluate the control environment through inspections accompanied by the certification body. 
3.46 Čeprav se Komisija strinja, da pravočasna ponovna izvedba že opravljenega pregleda zagotavlja boljšo oceno kakovosti pregledov na kraju samem, je še vedno mogoča ocena kontrolnega okolja v okviru inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki jih spremlja certifikacijski organ.
They also have the additional benefit of reducing the administrative burden on the farmer by avoiding an accumulation of controls. 
Poleg tega so dodatno koristni, ker s preprečevanjem kopičenja kontrol zmanjšujejo upravno obremenitev kmetov.
An analysis of the certification bodies’ reports, with regard to financial year 2010, shows that the certification bodies checked in total around 3 000 controls. 
Analiza poročil certifikacijskih organov za proračunsko leto 2010 kaže, da so certifikacijski organi skupno preverili približno 3 000 kontrol.
Where the certification bodies carried out the checks required, inspections were re-performed in around 24 % of the cases, accompanied in a further 45 %, while in 12 % both approaches were used. 
V zvezi s pregledi, ki so jih izvedli certifikacijski organi, so se zahtevani inšpekcijski pregledi v približno 24 % primerov ponovno izvedli, v 45 % so jih navedeni organi spremljali, v 12 % pa sta se uporabila oba pristopa.
In an additional 19 % of the cases, the certification bodies did not distinguish explicitly between the two methods. 
Pri dodatnih 19 % primerov certifikacijski organi niso izrecno razlikovali med metodama.
Validation of paying agencies’ inspection results 3.45. Thecertificationbodiesarerequestedtogivean opinion on the quality of the on-the-spot inspections carried out by the paying agencies and to validate the compilation of the inspection results. 
Potrjevanje rezultatov inšpekcijskih pregledov plačilnih agencij 3.45 Certifikacijski organi morajo izreči mnenje o kakovosti inšpekcijskih pregledov na kraju samem, ki jih izvedejo plačilne agencije, in potrditi zbrane rezultate inšpekcijskih pregledov.
The Commission in its AAR uses the inspection results to assess the residual error rate in agriculture expenditure. 3.46. 
Komisija v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih uporabi rezultate inšpekcijskih pregledov za oceno stopnje preostalih napak na področju kmetijskih odhodkov.
The Commission guidelines leave the certification bodies the choice to either accompany or to re-perform on-the-spot inspections. 
3.46 SmerniceKomisijecertifikacijskimorganomprepuš­ čajo izbiro, ali bodo spremljali inšpekcijske preglede na kraju samem ali jih bodo ponovno izvedli.
A vast majority of the certification bodies choose to validate the quality of the inspections not by way of re-performance but by way of accompanying the national inspectors. 
Velika večina certifikacij­ skih organov potrdi kakovost inšpekcijskih pregledov tako, da spremlja nacionalne inšpektorje, ne pa s ponovno izvedbo.
Based on its experience, the Court considers that the quality of inspections would improve if certification bodies were required systematically to re-perform previous inspections. 
Sodišče na podlagi svojih izkušenj meni, da bi se kakovost inšpekcijskih pregledov izboljšala, če bi morali certifikacijski organi sistematično ponovno izvajati opravljene inšpekcijske preglede.