natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/233 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S — No 10/2011 ‘Are the School Milk and School Fruit Schemes effective?’. — No 11/2011 ‘Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective?’. — No 12/2011 ‘Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities?’. — No 13/2011 ‘Does the control of customs procedure 42 prevent and detect VAT evasion?’. — No 14/2011 ‘Has EU assistance improved Croatia’s capacity to manage post-accession funding?’. — No 15/2011 ‘Do the Commission’s procedures ensure effective management of State aid control?’. — No 16/2011 ‘EU financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: achievements and future challenges’. 
10/2011 – Ali sta program „mleko za šole“ in sistem razdeljevanja sadja v šolah uspešna? — št.11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost? — št.12/2011–AlisoukrepiEUprispevalikprilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim? — št.13/2011–Aliseskontrolocarinskegapostopka42 preprečujejo in ugotovijo utaje DDV? — št.
The scope of the Court’s special reports in 2011 was similarly wide-ranging. 
Obseg posebnih poročil Sodišča v letu 2011 je bil podobno širok.
However, as the Union prepares to enter into the new 2014-2020 programming period, the Court examines here the lessons that can be learned from its 2011 special reports for the preparation of new programmes and projects, focusing on three themes: needs analysis, design, and the concept of EU added value. 
Ker pa se Unija pripravlja na začetek novega programskega obdobja (2014–2020), Sodišče tu obravnava, kaj se je mogoče naučiti iz njegovih posebnih poročil za leto 2011 pri pripravi novih programov in projektov, pri čemer se osredotoča na tri teme: analizo potreb, zasnovo in koncept dodane vrednosti EU.
These three themes are also reflected, to varying degrees, in the Court’s recent opinions on the proposed regu­ lations for the Common Strategic Framework and the common agricultural policy (17). _____________ (17) Opinions No 7/2011 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agri­ cultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the Common Strategic Framework and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ C 47, 17.2.2012) and No 1/2012 on certain proposals for regulations relating to the common agricultural policy for the period 2014-2020 (http://eca.europa.eu). 
Te tri teme se v različnem obsegu odražajo tudi v nedavnih mnenjih Sodišča o predlaganih uredbah za skupni strateški okvir in skupno kmetijsko politiko (17). _____________ (17) Mnenje št. 7/2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evrop­ skem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo, ki jih zajema splošni strateški okvir, o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu ter o razve­ ljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
The assistance provided to Croatia so that it will be able to manage EU funding after it joins the Union is an example where the Commission generally ensured that key needs were identified (19). 
(18) Pomoč Hrvaški, da bo lahko upravljala financiranje EU po pristopu, je primer, ko je Komisija na splošno poskrbela, da so bile ugotovljene ključne potrebe (19).
10.23. In2011,theCourtcontinuedtofindandreporton cases where sound needs analyses had not been carried out. 
10.23 Sodišče je v letu 2011 še vedno poročalo o ugoto­ vljenih primerih, ko niso bile izvedene tehtne analize potreb.
For example, early strategies for e-Government — where projects may be supported by the European Regional Devel­ opment Fund (ERDF) — were prepared mainly in response to political declarations rather than rigorous needs assessments, with the result that projects did not address the most important issues (20). 
Prve strategije za e-upravo, na primer, v okviru katerih se lahko projekti podpirajo s sredstvi ESRR, so bile večinoma pripravljene v odziv na politične izjave, namesto da bi temeljile na natančnih ocenah potreb, zato projekti niso obravnavali najpomembnejših vprašanj (20).
And for two out of the three nuclear decommissioning programmes audited by the Court, no needs assessment was carried out in relation to the programmes’ objective to reduce the impact of closing the nuclear plants earlier than originally planned (21). 
Pri dveh od treh programov za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, pa ni bila izvedena ocena potreb v zvezi s ciljem programov, da se ublažijo posledice predčasnega zaprtja jedrskih elek­ trarn (21).
10.24. Oneconsequenceofinadequateneedsanalysisis that it makes it harder to determine which of competing projects are likely to offer the best value for money. 
10.24 Neustreznaanalizapotrebmeddrugimotežujeodlo­ čanje o tem, za katere konkurenčne projekte je verjetno, da bodo prinesli najboljše rezultate za najmanj denarja.
This was the case in the audit of e-Government projects referred to above (22), and also in the audit of the EU support for agri-environment. 
To sta pokazali revizija zgoraj omenjenih projektov e-uprave (22) in revizija podpore EU za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe.
In the latter case, the Court reported that targeting funds at those areas most in need was key to enhancing the environmental effects of agri-environment support; however, Member States had not considered targeting on the basis of an analysis of the costs and benefits involved (23). _____________ (18) Annual Report concerning the financial year 2010, paragraph 8.36. 
V zadnjem primeru je Sodišče poročalo, da je usmerjanje sredstev na območja, ki jih najbolj potrebujejo, ključno za krepitev vplivov podpore za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe na okolje, vendar države članice kljub temu niso pretehtale ciljnega usmerjanja na podlagi analize stroškov in koristi (23). 12.11.2012 _____________ (18) Letno poročilo za proračunsko leto 2010, odstavek 8.36.
(19) Special Report No 14/2011 ‘Has EU assistance improved Croatia’s capacity to manage post-accession funding?’, paragraph 17 (http://eca.europa.eu). 
(19) Posebno poročilo št. 14/2011 – Ali je pomoč EU izboljšala zmogljivosti Hrvaške za upravljanje financiranja po pristopu?, odstavek 17 (http://eca.europa.eu).
(20) Special Report No 9/2011 ‘Have the e-Government projects supported by ERDF been effective?’, paragraph 56(a) (http://eca. europa.eu). 
(20) Posebno poročilo št. 9/2011 – Ali so bili projekti e-uprave, ki jih je podpiral ESRR, uspešni?, odstavek 56(a) (http://eca.europa.eu).
(21) Special Report No 16/2011 ‘EU financial assistance for the decom­ missioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: achievements and future challenges’, paragraph 26 and Figure 7 (http://eca.europa.eu). 
(21) Posebno poročilo št. 16/2011 – Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi, odstavek 26 in diagram 7 (http://eca.europa.eu).
(22) Special Report No 9/2011, paragraph 56(b). 
(22) Posebno poročilo št.
(23) Special Report No 7/2011 ‘Is agri-environment support well designed and managed?’, paragraphs 72 and 78 (http://eca.europa. eu). of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 10.22. The Commission agrees that a sound needs analysis forms an important part of the programme cycle and is analysing carefully the cases in which the Court found that a needs analysis had not been carried out sufficiently. 
(23) Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?, odstavka 72 in 78 (http://eca.europa.eu). O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E Komisija se strinja, da je tehtna analiza potreb pomemben del programskega cikla, in natančno preučuje primere, za katere analiza potreb po mnenju Sodišča ni bila zadovoljivo opravljena.
The cost of migrating to e-Government is very high. 
10.23 Stroški prehoda na e-upravo so zelo visoki.
Priorities are needed and it is reasonable that they are provided by political statements and declarations, which served to raise awareness and as early strategies. 
Prednostne naloge so potrebne in smiselno je, da so navedene v političnih izjavah in deklaracijah, ki so namenjene ozaveščanju in imajo vlogo zgodnjih strategij.
However, priority setting has improved signifi­ cantly in the interim period, and today all Member States have developed more sophisticated e-Government strategies. 
Določanje prednostnih nalog pa se je v vmesnem obdobju močno izboljšalo in danes so vse države članice razvile bolj prefinjene strategije e-uprave.
The Accession Treaties or subsequent regulations identified the need for mitigating measures. 
Pristopne pogodbe ali poznejše uredbe obravnavajo potrebo po blažilnih ukrepih.
The EU support scheme is designed to ensure that the measures proposed by the Member States are in accordance with and based on their national energy strategies, which inevitably consider the impact of the nuclear plants’ closure. 
Shema podpor EU je oblikovana tako, da zagota­ vlja skladnost in utemeljenost ukrepov, ki jih predlagajo države članice, z njihovimi nacionalnimi strategijami oskrbe z energijo, v katerih se preučujejo tudi posledice zaprtja jedrskih elektrarn.
10.24. The Commission agrees that needs analysis can help identify the priority projects. 
10.24 Komisija se strinja, da lahko analiza potreb pomaga dolo­ čiti prednostne projekte.
However, as regards agri-environment support, some Member States have considered the desirable degree of targeting on the basis of an analysis of the costs and benefits involved. 
Vendar so v povezavi s kmetijsko-okoljskimi ukrepi nekatere države članice želeno stopnjo ciljnega usmerjanja pretehtale na podlagi analize stroškov in koristi.
Romania, for example, targets High Nature Value agri-environment payments on a geographical basis, and the eligible areas are established using macro-level data. 
Romunija na primer ciljno usmerja kmetijsko-okoljska plačila za kmetovanje z visoko naravno vrednostjo na geografski osnovi, upravičene površine pa se določajo z uporabo podatkov na makro ravni.
In view of e-Government projects, following EU policy initiatives, today, all Member States have developed more sophisticated e-Government strategies based on the e-Government Action Plan 2011-2015. 
V okviru projektov e-uprave so vse države članice v skladu s pobudami politike EU danes razvile bolj prefinjene strategije e-uprave na podlagi akcijskega načrta za e-upravo za obdobje 2011–2015. 10.22
12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/235 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Design: insufficiently clear what is to be achieved 10.25. Identifying needs is only the start of the process. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/235 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Zasnova: ni dovolj jasno, kaj naj bi dosegli 10.25 Ugotavljanje potreb je le začetek procesa.
Good design both of the programmes and of the individual projects within those programmes is essential for sound financial management, so that funds achieve the maximum impact at the minimum cost. 
Dobra zasnova programov in njihovih posameznih projektov je ključna za dobro finančno poslovodenje, da se s finančnimi sredstvi doseže največji učinek pri najnižjih stroških.
The design of programmes and of individual projects within them should establish a link between the activities funded by the budget and the intended outputs, results and impacts of that spending. 
V zasnovi programov in njihovih posameznih projektov bi morala biti vzpostavljena povezava med dejavnostmi, ki se financirajo iz proračuna, in načrtovanimi izložki, rezultati in učinki te pora­ be.
10.26. Inonecase,theCommissiontookintoconsideration the design problems of one scheme to improve, at least in part, the design of a similar scheme. 
10.26 VenemprimerujeKomisijatežaveprizasnoviene sheme upoštevala pri zasnovi podobne sheme, da bi jo vsaj delno izboljšala.
As a result, measures to encourage the consumption of fruit in schools do not suffer from problems of unattractiveness to beneficiaries and the deadweight effect(24) that the similar school milk scheme does (25). 
Posledično ukrepi za spodbujanje uživanja sadja v šolah niso tako neprivlačni za upravičence in nimajo takih učinkov mrtvih izgub (24) kot podobni program „mleko za šole“ (25).
However, the Court continued to find a number of weaknesses in the design of the funding streams that it audited in 2011, as set out in the following paragraphs. 
Vendar je Sodišče še naprej odkrivalo številne slabosti v zasnovi programov odhodkov, ki jih je revidiralo v letu 2011, kot je opisano v naslednjih odstavkih.
However, almost all (18 out of 19) contribution agreements audited by the Court had one or more of a number of design weaknesses, such as the absence of baseline criteria, unspecific objectives or missing indicators. 
Kljub temu so skoraj vsi (18 od 19) sporazumi o prispevkih, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, vsebovali vsaj eno od številnih slabosti v zasnovi, kot so pomanjkanje izhodiščnih meril, nenatančno določeni cilji ali manjkajoči kazalniki.
As a result, there was a lack of clarity about what was to be achieved, and how success could be assessed (26). 
Zato ni bilo jasno, kaj naj bi se doseglo in kako bi bilo mogoče oceniti uspeh (26).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S _____________ (24) Deadweight occurs where a measure is used to support bene­ ficiaries who would have made the same choice in the absence of the aid. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E _____________ (24) Mrtve izgube nastanejo, kadar je ukrep namenjen podpiranju upra­ vičencev, ki bi ravnali enako tudi brez pomoči. (25) Posebno poročilo št.
(25) Special Report No 10/2011 ‘Are the School Milk and School Fruit Schemes effective?’, paragraph 53 (http://eca.europa.eu). 
10/2011 – Ali sta program „mleko za šole“ in sistem razdeljevanja sadja v šolah uspešna?, odstavek 53 (http://eca.europa.eu).
(26) Special Report No 3/2011 ‘The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations organisations in conflict-affected countries’, paragraphs 23, 24 and 48 (http://eca. europa.eu). 
(26) Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 – Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij Združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih, odstavki 23, 24 in 48 (http://eca.europa.eu).
EN The Commission is of the view that the latest revision of the School Milk Scheme (SMS) has addressed to a large extent the observations of the Court with a view to improving the overall efficiency of the system. 
Komisija meni, da zadnja revizija programa „mleko za šole“ obravnava velik del opažanj Sodišča z namenom izboljšati splošno učinkovitost sistema.
10.27. The Commission acknowledges the importance of project design but considers that only two of the 18 cases cited had weak­ nesses that could directly influence the project results. 
10.27 Komisija priznava pomen zasnove projektov, vendar meni, da sta le dva od 18 primerov vsebovala slabosti, ki bi lahko nepo­ sredno vplivale na rezultate projekta.
The Commission has introduced new training and guidance in 2011 to improve project design, which it considers largely meet the concerns of the Court. 
Komisija je v letu 2011 uvedla novo usposabljanje in izdala navodila za boljšo zasnovo projektov, za katera meni, da pretežno odgovarjajo na vprašanja Sodišča.
Furthermore, the Court’s special report recognised that, even in extremely difficult circumstances, projects implemented with the UN in conflict-affected countries achieve good results and are reasonably sustainable. 10.26. 
Poleg tega Sodišče v posebnem poročilu priznava, da projekti, ki se izvajajo skupaj z Združenimi narodi v državah, prizadetih v konflik­ tih, celo v izredno težkih razmerah dosegajo dobre rezultate in so razumno trajnostni. 10.26
EN C 344/236 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 10.28. TheSinglePaymentSchemeofthecommonagri­ cultural policy (CAP) was designed to encourage farmers to respond to market demand and to promote more environ­ mentally-friendly agricultural practices. However, there is a contradiction in the design of the scheme: while it is intended to support individual income, in practice the way that financial assistance is distributed takes little account of the specific circumstances of the recipient, with the result that the distribution of subsidies to individual farmers remains essentially based on the surface of land farmed and thus a high proportion of Single Payment Scheme aid still goes to large farms as was the case under the previous system (27). 
C 344/236 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 12.11.2012 10.28 Shema enotnega plačila v okviru skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) naj bi spodbudila kmete k odzivanju na povpra­ ševanje na trgu in spodbujala okolju prijaznejše kmetijske prakse. Vendar je zasnovana protislovno: čeprav je mišljena kot podpora individualnim dohodkom, se v praksi pri razde­ ljevanju finančne pomoči le malo upoštevajo specifične okoli­ ščine prejemnika, zato razdeljevanje subvencij posameznim kmetom v bistvu še vedno temelji na površini obdelovanih zemljišč in velik delež pomoči iz sheme enotnega plačila tako kot v prejšnjem sistemu še vedno prejemajo velike kmeti­ je (27).
The Single Payment Scheme (SPS) has proven to be a very effective tool to grant basic income support while allowing the farmer to make production decisions on the basis of market signals. 
Shema enotnega plačila (SEP) se je izkazala kot zelo učinkovito orodje za zagotavljanje osnovne dohodkovne podpore, ob tem pa kmetom omogoča, da odločitve o proizvodnji sprejemajo na podlagi tržnega dogajanja.
This is because payments are decoupled from production and do not interfere with production decisions. 
To je mogoče, ker so izplačila ločena od proizvodnje in ne vplivajo na proizvodne odločitve.
To be eligible for payments, beneficiaries, parcels and activities must match clear conditions set up in the Council Regulation that are compatible with WTO rules, i.e. not linked with production factors. 
Za upravičenost do izplačil morajo upravičenci, zemljišča in dejavnosti ustrezati jasnim pogojem, ki so določeni v uredbi Sveta in združljivi s pravili STO, tj. niso povezani s proizvodnimi dejavniki.
The needs for basic income support of ‘large farms’ should not be considered systematically lower than those of other farms as income in general depends strongly on types of production, input and output costs, farm labour, etc. The value and number of entitlements were calculated, using historical references of production and surfaces so as to ensure a smooth tran­ sition towards decoupling. 
SL O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 10.28 Potreb po osnovni dohodkovni podpori za „velike kmetije“ ne smemo sistematično šteti za manjše od potreb drugih kmetij, saj je prihodek na splošno močno odvisen od vrste proizvodnje, stroškov vložkov in izložkov, dela na kmetiji itd. Vrednost in število pravic sta bila izračunana na podlagi preteklih podatkov o proizvodnji in površini, s čimer se je zagotovil lahek prehod k ločeni podpori.
Hence, the current distribution of direct payments between farms is simply a reflection of the fact that agri­ cultural land and agricultural production are not shared equally among the farms in the EU. 
Tako je sedanja porazdelitev neposrednih plačil med kmetijami preprosto odsev dejstva, da kmetijska zemljišča in kmetijska proizvodnja niso enakomerno porazdeljeni med kmeti­ jami v EU.
Nevertheless, the issue of redistribution of support between farmers and Member States is considered in the legal proposals for CAP post-2013, and should also lead to improved targeting of the SPS aid. 
Kljub temu je vprašanje prerazporeditve podpore med kmeti in drža­ vami članicami obravnavano v pravnih predlogih za skupno kmetijsko politiko po letu 2013 in bi moralo privesti tudi do boljšega ciljnega usmerjanja pomoči SEP.
As to add value and quality in spending, the Commission has proposed to improve and add also some other elements, thus covering some of the issues mentioned by the Court in its special report: redesign and better targeting of support. 10.29. 
Glede zagotavljanja dodane vrednosti in kakovosti pri porabi sredstev je Komisija predlagala, da bi izboljšali in dodali druge elemente, s čimer bi zajeli vprašanja, ki jih v svojem posebnem poročilu omenja Sodišče: preoblikovanje in boljše ciljno usmerjanje podpore.
The appropriate instruments and legal means are in place and producers are invited to join the scheme on a voluntary basis. 
Na voljo so primerni instrumenti in pravna sredstva, proizvajalci pa so vabljeni k prostovoljnemu sodelovanju v shemi.
This is also confirmed by the clear interest in the scheme shown by producers: a significant number of product names has been registered (above 1 000), accounting for a market value of 14,5 billion euro (in 2008). 
To potrjuje tudi jasno zanimanje, ki ga za sodelovanje v shemi izkazujejo proizvajalci: registriranih je bilo veliko imen izdelkov (več kot 1 000), kar pomeni tržno vrednost v višini 14,5 milijarde EUR (v letu 2008).
The Member States that have joined the EU since 2004 are still picking up on speed in relation to the scheme. 
Za države članice, ki so se EU pridružile od leta 2004, se sodelovanje v shemi še vedno postopoma povečuje.
A series of initiatives, including information campaigns, trade fairs, thematic international exhibitions and/or preparation of guides for applicants for geographical indications (PDO or PGI), have been launched to further attract potential applicants. 
Predstavljena je bila vrsta pobud, vključno z informativnimi kampanjami, sejmi, mednarodnimi tematskimi razstavami in izdajo navodil za prijavo geografskih označb (ZOP ali ZGO), da bi privabili več morebitnih prosilcev.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/237 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 10.30. Under the common fisheries policy, the Commission provides support for Member States to reduce the capacity of their fishing fleets with the ultimate goal of preserving fish stocks. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/237 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 10.30 VokviruskupneribiškepolitikeKomisijadržavam članicam zagotavlja podporo za zmanjšanje ribolovne zmoglji­ vosti njihovih ribiških flot zaradi ohranjanja ribjih staležev, ki pa je zaradi težav v zasnovi manj uspešna.
For example, the eligibility and selection criteria for fishing vessel decommissioning schemes were poorly targeted, with the result that some fishing vessels were scrapped with little or no effect on targeted fish stocks (29). 
Tako na primer merila za upravičenost in izbiro pri shemah za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja niso bila dobro ciljno usmerjena, zato so bila dana v razrez nekatera ribiška plovila z malo ali nič učinka na ciljne ribje staleže (29).
EU added value: justification for the EU intervention 10.31. TheCommissionhasdefinedEUaddedvalueas‘the value resulting from an EU intervention which is additional to the value that would have been otherwise created by Member State action alone’ (30). 
Dodana vrednost EU: utemeljitev za posredovanje EU 10.31 Komisija je dodano vrednost EU opredelila kot „vred­ nost, ki izhaja iz posredovanja EU in ki dopolnjuje vrednost, ki bi bila dosežena izključno z ukrepi države članice“ (30).