natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
99 The Commission acknowledges that there is a possibility of over-and under-estimation of certain spending elements of climate relevance under the current methodology. 
99 Komisija priznava, da pri sedanji metodologiji obstaja možnost precenjenosti in podcenjenosti nekaterih elementov porabe v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi.
At the same time, we do not consider a set of principles developed by a group of international aid organisations in 2015 for mitigation tracking of their operations to be a relevant point of reference for the approach agreed at EU level. 
Hkrati menimo, da sklop načel, ki jih je leta 2015 postavila skupina mednarodnih organizacij za pomoč za spremljanje svojih dejavnosti pomoči za blažitev podnebnih sprememb, ni ustrezno izhodišče za pristop, ki je bil dogovorjen na ravni EU.
The method used by the Commission is sound and has been prepared in a transparent and coordinated manner and was communicated to the European Parliament and the Council. 
Metoda, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, je zanesljiva, pripravljena je bila na pregleden in usklajen način ter je bila predložena Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The Commission estimates the overall climate contribution of both CAP funds on the basis of a sound methodology, on which full details are provided in the programme statements accompanying the Commission’s Draft Budget. 
Komisija ocenjuje celoten podnebni prispevek obeh skladov SKP na podlagi zanesljive metodologije, o kateri so vse podrobnosti navedene v poročilih o programih, ki spremljajo njen osnutek proračuna.
The Commission believes that for green direct payments the impact fairly reflects the climate-relatedness of the three farming practices. 
Komisija verjame, da učinek neposrednih plačil za zeleno komponento pravično odraža povezanost treh kmetijskih praks s podnebnimi spremembami.
For non-greening direct payments, their benefit for climate actions in association with cross compliance can be assessed by applying a Rio marker of 40 % to a share of 20 % of non-greening direct payments. 
Glede neposrednih plačil za nezeleno komponento pa je mogoče njihovo korist za podnebne ukrepe oceniti v povezavi z navzkrižno skladnostjo z uporabo kazalnika iz Ria 40 % za delež 20 % neposrednih plačil za nezeleno komponento.
However the Commission believes that a climate impact of 8 % of non-greening direct payments is not overestimated if we look at the benefits for the climate of cross compliance and direct payments. 
Toda Komisija verjame, da podnebni vpliv neposrednih plačil za nezeleno komponento v višini 8 % ni precenjen, če upoštevamo koristi navzkrižne skladnosti in neposrednih plačil za podnebje.
This calculation fully reflects the principle of conservativeness. 
Ta izračun v celoti izraža načelo konzervativnosti.
100 The Commission estimates the overall climate contribution of both CAP funds on the basis of a sound methodology, on which full details are provided in the programme statements accompanying the Commission’s Draft Budget. 
100 Komisija ocenjuje celoten podnebni prispevek obeh skladov SKP na podlagi zanesljive metodologije, o kateri so vse podrobnosti navedene v poročilih o programih, ki spremljajo njen osnutek proračuna.
Reply of the Commission 79 Recommendation 4 — Correct overestimations The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Odgovori Komisije 79 Priporočilo 4 – Popraviti previsoke ocene Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
The tracking methodology needs to remain stable during the current MFF for reasons of predictability, consistency and transparency. 
Metodologija spremljanja mora ostati stabilna med sedanjim večletnim finančnim okvirom zaradi predvidljivosti, doslednosti in preglednosti.
However, the Commission will consider ways of fine-tuning the tracking methodology for the EAFRD for the post-2020 programming period without increasing the administrative burden. 
Vendar bo Komisija proučila načine za izboljšanje metodologije spremljanja odhodkov za EKSRP za programsko obdobje po letu 2020, ne da bi se povečalo upravno breme.
101 The Commission action plan will be complemented with more detailed, quantifiable targets. 
101 Akcijski načrt Komisije bo dopolnjen s podrobnejšimi, količinsko opredeljivimi cilji.
However, the most suitable time to set these is when drafting the Work Programmes for 2018-2020, not yet completed. 
Vendar bi bil najprimernejši čas za to pri pripravi delovnih programov za obdobje 2018–2020, ki pa še ni končana.
102 The Commission recognises that additional efforts are needed in several programmes to improve mainstreaming, but does not consider specific action plans to increase climate spending would have an added value. 
102 Komisija priznava, da so potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja v več programih za izboljšanje vključevanja, vendar meni, da posebni akcijski načrti za povečanje porabe za podnebne ukrepe ne bi imeli dodane vrednosti.
Recommendation 5 — Draw up action plans The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 5 – Priprava akcijskih načrtov Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission will assess opportunities to increase climate relevance in the context of the Mid-term Reviews of individual programmes and policies, as set out in the MFF MTR. 
Komisija bo ocenila priložnosti za povečanje pomena podnebnih vprašanj v vmesnem pregledu izvajanja posameznih programov in politik, kakor je navedeno v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira.
Pending the outcome of these reviews, the Commission will consider corrective action. 
Dokler niso znani rezultati teh pregledov, bo Komisija razmislila o korektivnem ukrepanju.
Instituting individual action plans would not be appropriate as individual programmes already provide processes for priority setting depending on the management mode. 
Uvajanje posameznih akcijskih načrtov ne bi bilo primerno, saj posamezni programi že opredeljujejo postopke za določanje prednostnih nalog, kar je odvisno od načina upravljanja.
103 The Commission considers that tracking commitment appropriations was a necessary first step to better integrating climate actions into the EU budget and provides a reasonable proxy, balancing the administrative burden of an additional layer of monitoring. 
103 Komisija meni, da je bilo spremljanje odobritev za sprejem obveznost nujen prvi korak k boljši vključitvi podnebnih ukrepov v proračun EU in da daje razumen približek, ki uravnoveša upravno breme dodatne ravni spremljanja.
The current estimates are indeed done on the basis of programmed expenditure (draft budget), they are however updated based on the actual voted budget and amending letters. 
Trenutne ocene so dejansko opravljene na podlagi načrtovanih odhodkov (predlog proračuna), vendar so posodobljene na podlagi dejanskega izglasovanega proračuna in pisnih predlogov spremembe.
The Commission will assess the cost-effectiveness of providing ex post estimates based on actual commitments. 
Komisija bo ocenila stroškovno učinkovitost zagotavljanja naknadnih ocen, ki temeljijo na dejanskih obveznostih.
However, calculations based on the actual payments would create additional administrative burden since the payments may last for years and may be subject to financial corrections. 
Toda izračuni na podlagi dejanskih plačil bi ustvarili dodatno upravno breme, saj se lahko plačila izvajajo več let in so lahko predmet finančnih popravkov.
The Commission can however provide an estimate, as approximately 97 % of commitment appropriations become payment appropriations. 
Komisija pa lahko poda oceno, saj približno 97 % odobritev za prevzem obveznosti postanejo odobritve plačil.
The Commission agrees with the need to strengthen the focus on results of the EU spending. 
Komisija se strinja, da je treba okrepiti osredotočenost na rezultate porabe sredstev EU.
However, the current performance framework set by the legislator provide for climate-related indicators only for a part of the spending and these indicators cannot be aggregated at the level of the EU budget. 
Vendar pa sedanji okvir uspešnosti, ki ga določi zakonodajalec, zagotovi kazalnike, povezane s podnebjem, le za del porabe in teh kazalnikov ni mogoče združevati na ravni proračuna EU.
The lessons learnt will be taken into consideration in the setup of the next MFF performance framework. 
Pridobljene izkušnje bodo upoštevane pri oblikovanju okvira za ocenjevanje smotrnosti naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira.
Reply of the Commission 80 Recommendation 6 — Develop indicators monitoring actual spending on climate action and related results (a) The Commission does not accept the recommendation to develop a new monitoring system at this stage. 
Odgovori Komisije 80 Priporočilo 6 – Razvoj kazalnikov za spremljanje dejanske porabe za podnebne ukrepe in s tem povezanih rezultatov (a) Komisija ne sprejema priporočila za oblikovanje novega sistema za spremljanje na tej stopnji.
It would lead to an increase in the level of the administrative burden imposed on Member States which was not foreseen under the current regulations and were not included in the partnership agreements and Operational Programmes. 
To bi vodilo do povečanja upravnega bremena držav članic, kar ni bilo predvideno v okviru sedanjih predpisov in ni bilo vključeno v sporazume o partnerstvu in operativne programe.
The Commission will continue to use the monitoring systems in place that also provide data on expenditure. (b) The Commission accepts the recommendation and will implement it as explained below. 
Komisija bo še naprej uporabljala uvedene sisteme spremljanja, ki zagotavljajo tudi podatke o odhodkih. (b) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in ga bo izvajala, kot je razloženo v nadaljevanju.
It will strengthen and improve comparability of the climate-related results indicators in all EU budget areas, and will consider options in the context of the next MFF to establish climate-related results indicators to assess the EU budget contribution to climate action, in particular to assess greenhouse gas emissions and reductions brought about through EU-funded measures. (c) The Commission accepts the recommendation which it considers as implemented as explained below. 
Okrepila in izboljšala bo primerljivost kazalnikov rezultatov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, na vseh proračunskih področjih EU in bo proučila možnosti, da se v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru določijo kazalniki rezultatov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, za oceno prispevka proračuna EU k podnebnim ukrepom, zlasti za ocenjevanje emisij toplogrednih plinov in njihovega zmanjšanja zaradi ukrepov, ki jih financira EU. (c) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo, ki je po njenem mnenju izvedeno, kot je razloženo v nadaljevanju.
It will continue to actively promote the exchange of good practices also in the specific area of climate-related result indicators. 
Še naprej bo dejavno spodbujala izmenjavo dobrih praks tudi na posebnem področju kazalnikov rezultatov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi.
For example, the Expert group on monitoring and evaluation for the CAP already provides a forum for exchanges of good practices on the evaluation of the CAP, including on such indicators. 
Tako na primer strokovna skupina za spremljanje in ocenjevanje za SKP že zagotavlja forum za izmenjavo dobrih praks v zvezi z ocenjevanjem SKP, vključno s takšnimi kazalniki.
105 The targeting of research and innovation activities on particular sectors or clusters (such as low carbon economy) were expressly not the subject of detailed discussions in programming. 
105 Usmerjanje dejavnosti raziskav in inovacij na določene sektorje ali skupine (kot so nizkoogljično gospodarstvo) izrecno ni bilo predmet poglobljenih razprav pri načrtovanja programov.
The negotiation of R&I objectives was subject to the ex ante conditionality on smart specialisation. 
Za pogajanja o ciljih raziskav in inovacij je veljala predhodna pogojnost na področju pametne specializacije.
Had the Commission intervened to have a stronger climate-related orientation as regards research and innovation in the OPs this would have been contrary to regulatory requirements, in particular the fact that smart specialisation strategies are a bottom-up process. 
Če bi Komisija ukrepala za močnejšo usmerjenost na podnebno področje v zvezi z raziskavami in inovacijami v operativnih programih, bi bilo to v nasprotju z regulativnimi zahtevami, zlasti glede na dejstvo, da so strategije pametne specializacije proces „od spodaj navzgor“.
In that context the trend is that investments in R&I in energy-low carbon themes are likely to be significantly higher that set out in the programmes and captured initially in the tracking methodology. 
V tem okviru obstaja težnja, da bodo naložbe v raziskave in inovacije na področjih energije iz obnovljivih virov in nizkoogljične družbe verjetno znatno višje, kot so določene v programih in prvotno ugotovljene z metodologijo spremljanja.
106 The Commission underlines that as the ESF contribution to climate action can only be indirect, in particular through investments into green skills, which are in turn closely related to labour market developments and hence demand-driven, the actual share of the ESF allocated to climate-related expenditure will only be known after the programmes’ implementation. 
106 Komisija poudarja, da je prispevek ESS k podnebnim ukrepom lahko le posreden, zlasti prek naložb v zelena znanja in spretnosti, ki so po drugi strani same tesno povezane z razvojem trgov dela in s tem s povpraševanjem, zato bo dejanski delež ESS pri odhodkih, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, znan šele po izvedbi programov.
The Commission considers that the share of the ESF allocated to climate-related expenditure established on the basis of the information reported by the Member States in the ESF operational programmes may therefore underestimate the expected contribution of the ESF to climate action in the 2014-2020 period. 
Komisija meni, da lahko delež ESS pri odhodkih, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, kot je določen na podlagi informacij, ki so jih sporočile države članice v operativnih programih ESS, tako prinese prenizko oceno pričakovanega prispevka ESS za podnebne ukrepe v obdobju 2014–2020.
The Commission refers to its common reply to paragraphs 77-79. 
Komisija se sklicuje na svoj odgovor na odstavke 77–79.
Reply of the Commission 81 107 The reform of the CAP has led to a significant increase in the financing of climate action as compared to the 2007-2013 period. 
Odgovori Komisije 81 107 Reforma SKP je privedla do znatnega povečanja financiranja podnebnih ukrepov v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007–2013.
108 The Commission does not share the view that the greening of direct payments rests in practice largely on already existing agricultural practices. 
108 Komisija se ne strinja z mnenjem, da ekologizacija neposrednih plačil v praksi v veliki meri temelji na obstoječih kmetijskih praksah.
Instead the Commission believes that the introduction of greening will significantly contribute to additional climate actions. 
Namesto tega Komisija meni, da bo uvedba ekologizacije znatno prispevala k dodatnim podnebnim ukrepov.
The requirements for ecological focus area and crop diversification are indeed new and the protection of permanent pasture has been strongly reinforced with for instance the full protection of environmentally sensitive permanent grassland and a reduced margin of possibility to plough up permanent grassland. 
Zahteve za površine z ekološkim pomenom in diverzifikacijo posevkov so dejansko nove, zaščita trajnih travnikov pa je bila močno okrepljena, na primer s popolno zaščito okoljsko občutljivih površin s trajnim travinjem in znižano stopnjo možnosti preoranja trajnega travinja.
The green payment has de facto increased the baseline beyond which environmental practices can be paid under rural development programmes. 
Plačevanje za zeleno komponento je de facto zvišalo osnovo, od katere naprej se lahko plačuje za okoljske prakse kot del programov razvoja podeželja.
The payments granted for types of operations programmed under the agri-environment climate measure can only be made for commitments and requirements going beyond the greening obligations. 
Plačila za vrste dejavnosti, načrtovana v okviru kmetijsko-okoljskih podnebnih ukrepov, je mogoče izvajati le za obveznosti in zahteve, ki presegajo obveznosti za zeleno komponento.
This implies higher environmental and climatic outcomes. 
To pomeni boljše okoljske in podnebne rezultate.
109 There is an increased focus on monitoring EMFF spending in climate action in the MS EMFF annual implementation reports. 
109 V letnih poročilih držav članic o izvajanju je večji poudarek namenjen spremljanju porabe ESPR v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi.
See Commission reply to paragraph 43. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 43.
Recommendation 7 — Explore all potential opportunities and ensure a real shift towards climate action (a) The Commission partially accepts the recommendation in the same sense as for Recommendation 5, i.e. that it will identify the areas with under-utilised potential and consider opportunities and actions to increase climate relevance in their spending programmes in the context of their individual Mid-term Reviews. 
Priporočilo 7 – Preučitev vseh mogočih priložnosti in zagotavljanje resničnega premika v smeri podnebnih ukrepov (a) Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo v istem smislu kot glede priporočila 5, tj. da bo opredelila področja s premalo izkoriščenim potencialom in preučila priložnosti in ukrepe za povečanje pomena podnebnih ukrepov v svojih programih porabe v njihovih posameznih vmesnih pregledih.
However, it will not develop specific action plans on climate spending for individual programmes. Recommendation 7 (b) The Commission does not accept this recommendation. 
Vendar ne bo razvila posebnih akcijskih načrtov na področju porabe za podnebne ukrepe za posamezne programe. (b) Komisija ne sprejema tega priporočila.
Changing the multiannual financial programming at this stage in ESIF programmes managed under shared management, with financing structures that are determined by pre-allocated envelopes, is neither practicable nor feasible. 
Spreminjanje večletnega finančnega načrtovanja na tej stopnji v programih ESI, ki se upravljajo na podlagi deljenega upravljanja, s finančnimi strukturami, ki so določene z vnaprej dodeljenimi zneski, ni ne praktično ne izvedljivo.
Similarly not feasible within this programming period are the development and adoption of new climate action measures in the legislative framework (e.g. of the EMFF). 
Prav tako v tem programskem obdobju nista izvedljiva razvoj in prilagajanje novih podnebnih ukrepov v zakonodajnem okviru (npr. ESPR).
At the same time the Commission will consider options to strengthen climate mainstreaming in the context of the midterm reviews of individual programmes. 
Obenem bo Komisija proučila možnosti za okrepitev vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov v vmesnih pregledih posameznih programov.
Event Date Adoption of the Audit Planning Memorandum/Start of audit 14.10.2015 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 22.7.2016 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 26.10.2016 Commission’s (or other auditee’s) official replies received in all languages 14.11.2016 
Dogodek Datum Sprejetje revizijskega memoranduma / začetek revizije 14.10.2015 Osnutek poročila uradno poslan Komisiji (ali drugemu revidirancu) 22.7.2016 Sprejetje končnega poročila po razčiščevalnem postopku 26.10.2016 Prejeti uradni odgovori Komisije (ali drugega revidiranca) v vseh jezikih 14.11.2016
In order to respond to climate change and the associated substantial investment needs, the EU has agreed that at least 20 % of its budget for 2014-2020 should be spent on climate-related action. 
EU se je v odziv na podnebne spremembe in z njimi povezane velike potrebe po naložbah odločila, da bo vsaj 20 % proračuna za obdobje 2014–2020 porabila za ukrepe v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami.
We found that ambitious work was underway and that, overall, progress had been made. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je delo, ki poteka, ambiciozno in da je bil na splošno dosežen napredek.
However, there is a serious risk that the 20 % target will not be met without more effort. 
Vendar obstaja resno tveganje, da 20-odstotni cilj brez dodatnega prizadevanja ne bo dosežen.
The implementation of the target has led to more, and better-focused, climate action funding in the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund. 
Zaradi prizadevanj za dosego cilja je postalo financiranje podnebnih ukrepov iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijskega sklada obsežnejše in bolje usmerjeno.
In the European Social Fund, and in the areas of agriculture, rural development and fisheries, however, there has been no significant shift towards climate action. 
Pri Evropskem socialnem skladu ter na področjih kmetijstva, razvoja podeželja in ribištva pa kljub temu ni bilo nobenega večjega premika v smeri podnebnih ukrepov.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 32 EU assistance to Ukraine EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
32 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Pomoč EU Ukrajini EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-6378-0 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-6337-7 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-6343-8 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/237521 doi:10.2865/937510 doi:10.2865/503560 QJ-AB-16-031-EN-C QJ-AB-16-031-EN-N QJ-AB-16-031-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-6321-6 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-6385-8 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-6328-5 ISSN 1831-094X ISSN 1977-5784 ISSN 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/43671 doi:10.2865/79965 doi:10.2865/40758 QJ-AB-16-031-SL-C QJ-AB-16-031-SL-N QJ-AB-16-031-SL-E © Evropska unija, 2016 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 32 EU assistance to Ukraine (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
32 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Pomoč EU Ukrajini (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
Audit team 02 The ECA’s special reports set out the results of its performance and compliance audits of specific budgetary areas or management topics. 
Revizijska ekipa 02 Posebna poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča predstavljajo rezultate njegovih revizij smotrnosti poslovanja in skla­ dnosti za posamezna proračunska področja ali upravljavske teme.
This performance audit was produced by Chamber III – headed by ECA Member Karel Pinxten - which specialises in external action, security and justice spending areas. 
To revizijo smotrnosti je opravil senat III, ki ga vodi član Evropskega računskega sodišča Karel Pinxten in ki je specializi­ ran za porabo na področjih zunanjih ukrepov, varnosti in pravice.
The audit was led by ECA Member Szabolcs Fazakas, supported by Márton Baranyi, Attaché of his private office; Beatrix Lesiewicz, Principal Manager, and Francis Joret, Principal Manager ad interim; Christian Geoffroy, Head of Task; Alina Milasiute and Balazs Kaszap, Auditors. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Szabolcs Fazakas, pomagali pa so mu ataše v njegovem kabinetu Márton Baranyi, vodilna upravna uslužbenka Beatrix Lesiewicz in začasni vodilni upravni uslužbenec Francis Joret, vodja naloge Christian Geoffroy ter revizorja Alina Milasiute in Balazs Kaszap.
From left to right: B. Kaszap, B. Lesiewicz, F. Joret, S. Fazakas, C. Geoffroy, A. Milasiute, M. Baranyi. 
Od leve proti desni: B. Kaszap, B. Lesiewicz, F. Joret, S. Fazakas, C. Geoffroy, A. Milasiute, M. Baranyi.