natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Special Report No 8 2012 TARGETING OF AID FOR THE MODERNISATION OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 8 2012 USMERJANJE POMOČI ZA POSODABLJANJE KMETIJSKIH GOSPODARSTEV (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Fax +352 4398-46410 E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://eca.europa.eu Special Report No 8 2012 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: eca-info@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012 ISBN 978-92-9237-647-5 doi:10.2865/34343 © European Union, 2012 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2012 ISBN 978-92-9237-662-8 doi:10.2865/43790 © Evropska unija, 2012 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
3 CONTENTS Paragraph I–VI 1–16 1–7 8–9 10–16 10–16 17–22 23–65 23–43 23–24 25–28 29–32 33–37 38 39–40 41–43 44–55 44–45 46–55 GLOSSARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION RURAL DEVELOPMENT — THE FRAMEWORK OF MEASURE 121 WHAT IS ‘MEASURE 121’? 
3 KAZALO Odstavek I–VI 1–16 1–7 8–9 10–16 10–16 17–22 23–65 23–43 23–24 25–28 29–32 33–37 38 39–40 41–43 44–55 44–45 46–55 GLOSAR POVZETEK UVOD RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA – OKVIR UKREPA 121 KAJ JE UKREP 121?
56–65 56–59 60–65 66–73 TARGETING THE AID TO AVOID RISKS TO SUSTAINABILITY AND DEADWEIGHT INSUFFICIENT VERIFICATION OF THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF HOLDINGS AND INVESTMENT PROJECTS SUBMITTED MEMBER STATES SELECTED PROJECTS THAT HAD ALREADY STARTED, THEREBY ENTAILING THE RISK OF DEADWEIGHT CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ANNEX — SELECTED RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES (RDP) AND CORRESPONDING MEMBER STATES OR THEIR REGIONS COVERED BY THE AUDIT, TOGETHER WITH THE RESPECTIVE BUDGET FOR MEASURE 121, FOR 2007–13 REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 4 Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev 56–65 56–59 60–65 66–73 USMERJANJE POMOČI, DA SE PREPREČIJO TVEGANJE ZA TRAJNOST IN MRTVE IZGUBE NEZADOSTNO PREVERJANJE EKONOMSKE UPRAVIČENOSTI GOSPODARSTEV IN PRIJAVLJENIH NALOŽBENIH PROJEKTOV DRŽAVE ČLANICE SO IZBRALE PROJEKTE, KI SO SE ŽE ZAČELI IZVAJATI, ZARADI ČESAR JE PRIŠLO DO TVEGANJA MRTVIH IZGUB ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA PRILOGA – IZBRANI PROGRAMI RAZVOJA PODEŽELJA (PRP) IN USTREZNE DRŽAVE ČLANICE ALI NJIHOVE REGIJE, KI SO BILE VKLJUČENE V REVIZIJO, TER USTREZNI PRORAČUN ZA UKREP 121 ZA OBDOBJE 2007–2013 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 4 Posebno poročilo št.
5 GLOSSARY Axes: Rural development in the 2007–13 programming period is implemented under four thematic axes, which represent coherent groups of rural development measures. 
Osi: Razvoj podeželja se v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 izvaja v okviru štirih tematskih osi, ki predstavljajo skladne svežnje ukrepov za razvoj podeželja.
CAP: Common agricultural policy: the set of legislation and practices adopted by the European Union to provide a common, unified policy on agriculture. 
SKP: Skupna kmetijska politika: sklop predpisov in praks, ki jih je Evropska unija sprejela, da bi zagotovila skupno in poenoteno politiko na področju kmetijstva.
Community strategic guidelines: With these strategic guidelines the Council identifies the European Union's priorities under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). 
Strateške smernice Skupnosti: S temi strateškimi smernicami je Svet opredelil prednostne naloge Evropske unije v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP).
It establishes a link with the objectives established by the Lisbon and Göteborg European Councils and translates them into rural development policy. 
Povezal jih je s cilji, določenimi na zasedanjih Evropskega sveta v Lizboni in Göteborgu, ter jih preoblikoval v politiko razvoja podeželja.
The idea is to ensure the consistency of rural development with other EU policies, in particular in the field of cohesion and environment, and accompany the implementation of the new common agricultural policy (CAP) and the restructuring involved. 
Namen je zagotoviti skladnost razvoja podeželja z drugimi politikami EU, zlasti na področju kohezije in okolja, ter podpreti izvajanje nove skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) in z njo povezanega prestrukturiranja.
Measure: An aid scheme for implementing a policy. 
U121: Ukrep 121 – posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev Ukrep: Shema pomoči za izvajanje politike.
A measure defines the rules for the projects that can be financed within an axis. 
Ukrep določa pravila za projekte, ki se lahko financirajo v okviru osi.
6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The European Union (EU) co-finances investment projects on agricultural holdings through its rural development policy. 
6 POVZETEK I. Evropska unija (EU) v okviru svoje politike razvoja podeželja sofinancira naložbene projekte kmetijskih gospodarstev.
Under the current programming period for 2007–13, 11,1 billion1 euro is budgeted for a specific investment measure called ‘modernisation of agricultural holdings’. 
V proračunu sedanjega programskega obdobja za leta 2007–2013 je 11,1 milijarde EUR1 namenjenih posebnemu naložbenemu ukrepu, ki se imenuje posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev.
EU funding is further complemented by national public expenditure to cover part of the total investment cost. 
Sredstva EU dopolnjujejo nacionalni javni odhodki, ki pokrivajo del skupnih stroškov naložb.
The Council has defined in its Community strategic guidelines for rural development specific EU priorities to be addressed through the rural development policy and Member States are requested to target funding on clearly defined objectives reflecting identified needs in the Member States’ rural areas. 
Svet je v strateških smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja opredelil posebne prednostne naloge EU, ki jih je treba obravnavati s politiko razvoja podeželja, države članice pa morajo sredstva usmeriti v jasno opredeljene cilje, ki odražajo ugotovljene potrebe na podeželju v državah članicah.
In 2009, to further strengthen operations related to the EU’s priorities of climate change, renewable energy, water management, biodiversity and the restructuring of the dairy sector, an extra 4,95 billion euro was allocated to rural development measures including modernisation through the ‘Health Check’ and the European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP). 
Leta 2009 je bilo dodeljenih dodatnih 4,95 milijarde EUR ukrepom razvoja podeželja, vključno s posodabljanjem s sistematskim pregledom in evropskim načrtom za oživitev gospodarstva (EERP), da bi se dodatno okrepile dejavnosti, povezane s prednostnimi nalogami EU na področju podnebnih sprememb, obnovljivih virov energije, gospodarjenja z vodnimi viri, biotske raznovrstnosti in prestrukturiranja sektorja mleka.
The audit examined whether EU aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings was directed to EU priorities and specific needs in Member States. 
Pri reviziji je bilo preučeno, ali je bila pomoč EU za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev usmerjena v prednostne naloge EU in posebne potrebe v državah članicah.
V. The Court found that: (a) Whilstthemeasure121‘modernisationofagricul-tural holdings’ was achieving its nominal objective of modernisation, this was almost inevitable as any investment or purchase of new equipment results in some degree of modernisation. 
V. Sodišče je ugotovilo, da: (a) je ukrep 121 za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev sicer dosegel cilj posodabljanja iz svojega poimenovanja, kar pa je bilo skoraj neizogibno, saj vsaka naložba ali nakup nove opreme prinaša delno posodobitev.
The measure has the potential to provide greater value for money if the funds available were better targeted. (b) The extent of targeting varies significantly between the Member States reviewed. 
Ukrep bi lahko zagotovil boljše razmerje med ceno in koristmi, če bi bila sredstva bolje usmerjena; (b) se usmerjanje sredstev med revidiranimi državami članicami močno razlikuje.
Some target effectively whereas others did not apply the good selection criteria they had established or have weak targeting systems. 1 Financial data as at January 2012. Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
Nekatere sredstva uspešno usmerjajo, medtem ko druge ne uporabljajo dobrih izbirnih meril, ki so jih vzpostavile, ali pa imajo slabe sisteme usmerjanja; 1 Finančni podatki iz januarja 2012. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev
(c) Member States’ rural development programmes (RDPs) often contain insufficient information to demonstrate that investment aid has been adequately targeted. 
(c) podatki v programih razvoja podeželja (PRP) držav članic pogosto ne zadostujejo za dokaz ustrezne usmerjenosti pomoči za naložbe.
Information is likewise lacking on the project selection process. 
Tudi podatkov o procesu izbire projektov je premalo.
Consequently, the Member States’ project selection procedures are often not known by the Commission when it approves the RDP. (d) The Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework does not generate the type of data necessary to allow progress in the achievement of EU priorities to be monitored; the data was found not to be reliable and it does not allow comparisons between Member States (and/or regions) to be drawn. (e) Further strengthening of operations related to the EU priorities was not achieved by some Member States due to the substitution of the extra funding with funds already programmed for the measures concerned prior to the ‘Health Check’. (f) The procedures for establishing the viability and sustainability of a holding or the investment project were not effective in all Member States. (g) The Court found that the deadweight risk linked to the retroactive approval of investments which had already started persists. 
Zato Komisija ob odobritvi PRP pogosto ne pozna izbirnih postopkov držav članic za projekte; (d) okvir skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja ne daje take vrste podatkov, ki je potrebna za spremljanje napredka pri izpolnjevanju prednostnih nalog EU. Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da podatki niso zanesljivi in ne omogočajo primerjave med državami članicami (in/ali regijami); (e) nekatere države članice zaradi nadomestitve dodatnega financiranja s sredstvi, ki so bila za zadevne ukrepe namenjena že pred sistematskim pregledom, niso dodatno okrepile dejavnosti, povezanih s prednostnimi nalogami EU; (f) postopkizaugotavljanjeekonomskeupravičenosti in trajnosti gospodarstva ali naložbenega projekta niso bili uspešni v vseh državah članicah; (g) tveganje mrtvih izgub zaradi naknadne odobritve naložb, ki so se že izvajale, ni bilo odpravljeno.
On the basis of its findings the Court makes the following recommendations: (a) The Commission should not approve RDPs unless they demonstrate that the aid is targeted and include clear and relevant selection criteria addressing EU priorities and national or regional needs. (b) The Commission should ensure that for the forthcoming programming period relevant and reliable information is obtained to facilitate management and monitoring of the results of the measure and to demonstrate the extent to which the aid given is contributing to the achievement of EU priorities. 
Sodišče na podlagi svojih ugotovitev priporoča, naj: (a) KomisijaneodobriPRP,četinedokažejo,dajepo-moč usmerjena, in ne vsebujejo jasnih in ustreznih izbirnih meril, ki obravnavajo prednostne naloge EU ter nacionalne ali regionalne potrebe; (b) Komisija zagotovi, da se bodo za prihodnje programsko obdobje pridobili ustrezni in zanesljivi podatki, da se omogoči upravljanje in spremljanje rezultatov ukrepa ter da se pokaže, koliko odobrena pomoč prispeva k izpolnjevanju prednostnih nalog EU; POVZETEK (c) Komisija za zagotovitev dodatnega učinka financiranja predlaga zakonodajo za vključitev te zahteve v povezane uredbe EU, kadar želi določene ukrepe in proračunska sredstva nameniti za posebne prednostne naloge, kot je bilo pri sistematskem pregledu; (d) države članice vzpostavijo uspešne in tveganju primerne postopke, s katerimi zagotovijo, da projekti ne dobijo donacije, če obstaja dvom o finančni upravičenosti naložbe ali trajnosti gospodarstva; (e) Komisija spodbuja države članice k dobri praksi, v skladu s katero so odhodki projekta upravičeni šele od datuma odobritve donacije.
7 Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
7 Posebno poročilo št. 8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev
8 INTRODUCTION RURAL DEVELOPMENT — THE FRAMEWORK OF MEASURE 121 1. 
8 UVOD RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA – OKVIR UKREPA 121 1.
The EU has set up a common rural development policy, also known as the ‘second pillar’ of the common agricultural policy (the ‘CAP’). The policy is implemented through multiannual programming periods. 
EU je vzpostavila skupno politiko razvoja podeželja, znano tudi kot drugi steber skupne kmetijske politike (SKP), ki se izvaja v večletnih programskih obdobjih.
The current period runs from 2007 to 2013 and payments must be completed by 2015. 
Sedanje obdobje traja od leta 2007 do leta 2013, plačila pa morajo biti zaključena do leta 2015.
The policy is based on the co-financing principle: EU funds are complemented by national funding, and also by private funding. 
Politika temelji na načelu sofinanciranja: sredstva EU dopolnjujejo nacionalna, pa tudi zasebna sredstva.
The EU co-finances operations through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), for which 96 billion euro was budgeted for the programming period 2007 to 2013. 
EU sofinancira dejavnosti prek Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), katerega proračun je v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 znašal 96 milijard EUR.
This includes almost 5 billion euro supplementary funding made available following the ‘Health Check’ and the European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP)2. 2. 
To vključuje skoraj 5 milijard EUR dodatnih sredstev, ki so bila zagotovljena po sistematskem pregledu in evropskem načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva.2 2.
The policy is based on three themes (‘axes’), plus a horizontal axis known as Leader. 
Politika temelji na treh temah (oseh) in horizontalni osi, imenovani LEADER.
The three axes are: ɦ Axis 1: Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector; ɦ Axis 2: Improving the environment and the countryside; and ɦ Axis 3: Improving the quality of life in rural areas. 
Tri osi so: – 1. os: izboljšanje konkurenčnosti kmetijskega in gozdarskega sektorja; – 2. os: izboljšanje okolja in podeželja ter – 3. os: izboljšanje kakovosti življenja na podeželju.
The Community strategic guidelines set at Community level the strategic priorities for rural development, while the main rules governing rural development policy for the period 2007 to 2013, as well as the policy measures available to Member States and regions, are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/20053. 
Strateške prioritete za razvoj podeželja na ravni Skupnosti so določene v strateških smernicah Skupnosti, glavna pravila, ki urejajo politiko razvoja podeželja za obdobje 2007–2013, kot tudi ukrepi politike, ki so na voljo državam članicam in regijam, pa so določeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št.
Within each axis, legislation has defined a set of ‘rural development measures’ which are specific instruments to implement the axis. 
Znotraj vsake osi je z zakonodajo opredeljen sklop ukrepov za razvoj podeželja, ki so specifični instrumenti za izvajanje osi.
The Member States draw up their own rural development programmes (RDP), at national or regional level, in which they define a strategy and propose the measures they wish to use to address their identified needs. 
Države članice pripravijo svoje programe razvoja podeželja (PRP) na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni, v katerih opredelijo strategijo in predlagajo ukrepe, s katerimi želijo obravnavati ugotovljene potrebe. PRP so glavni programski instrument za usmerjanje sredstev EU.
These programmes are approved by the European Commission. 
Odobri jih Evropska komisija.
A total of 97 RDPs were approved for the current programming period. 
Za sedanje programsko obdobje je bilo odobrenih skupaj 97 PRP.
2 In 2007, the European Commission proposed a ‘Health Check’ on the CAP which was subsequently adopted by the Council in 2008. 
2 Evropska komisija je leta 2007 predlagala sistematski pregled skupne kmetijske politike (SKP), ki ga je Svet sprejel leta 2008.
Subsequent to the ‘Health Check’, and as a response to the 2008 economic crisis, the Commission drew up the EERP which was agreed by the Council in December 2008. 
Komisija je po sistematskem pregledu in kot odziv na gospodarsko krizo leta 2008 pripravila evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva, ki ga je Svet sprejel decembra 2008.
3 Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ L 277, 21.10.2005, p. 
1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) (UL L 277, 21.10.2005, str.
In order to monitor and evaluate the implementation of rural development policy, the European Commission and the Member States have defined the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF). 
Evropska komisija in države članice so za spremljanje in vrednotenje izvajanja politike razvoja podeželja opredelile okvir skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja.
The CMEF provides a set of indicators which are intended to assess, at output, result and impact level, how far the expected objectives have been achieved. 
Ta okvir vključuje sklop kazalnikov za ocenjevanje doseganja pričakovanih ciljev na ravni izložkov, rezultatov in učinkov.
This report addresses the specific measure 121 under axis 1, which subsidises investment projects aimed at modernising agricultural holdings. 
V tem poročilu je obravnavan poseben ukrep 121 v okviru 1. osi, s katerim se subvencionirajo naložbeni projekti za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev.
Measure 121 finances investments in agricultural holdings. 
Ukrep 121 financira naložbe v kmetijska gospodarstva.
These investments may range from simple items such as farm tools and wooden fruit boxes up to complex projects such as biogas installations. 
To so lahko naložbe v enostavne predmete, kot so kmetijsko orodje in leseni zaboji za sadje, ali pa kompleksni projekti, kot so obrati za pridobivanje bioplina.
Its specific EU budget totals 11,1 billion euro (financed through the EAFRD)4, which represents, over the whole 2007–2013 programming period, around 11 % of all the EU’s planned spending on rural development in the EU. 
Posebni proračun EU za ta ukrep znaša 11,1 milijarde EUR (financira se prek EKSRP)4, kar v celotnem programskem obdobju 2007–2013 pomeni okrog 11 % celotne načrtovane porabe EU za razvoj podeželja v EU.
All Member States have chosen to use measure 121. 
Za uporabo ukrepa 121 so se odločile vse države članice.
4 Financial figures as at January 2012, including 630 million euro from the ‘Health Check’ and the EERP. 
4 Finančni podatki iz januarja 2012, vključno s 630 milijoni EUR, zagotovljenimi s sistematskim pregledom in evropskim načrtom za oživitev gospodarstva.
9 Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
9 Posebno poročilo št. 8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev
BOX 1 10 EXAMPLES OF THE RANGE AND TYPE OF INVESTMENTS FINANCED BY MEASURE 121 Photos taken during the audit illustrate how investment items financed through measure 121 range from forklifts ... ... to more complex machinery such as tractors and precision planters ... ... to animal housing equipped with mobile straw-spreading devices. Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
OKVIR 1 10 PRIMERI, KI KAŽEJO RAZNOLIKOST IN VRSTE NALOŽB, FINANCIRANIH Z UKREPOM 121 Fotografije, posnete med revizijo, kažejo različne predmete, kupljene v okviru naložb, ki so se financirale z ukrepom 121, od viličarja ... ... in bolj kompleksnih strojev, kot so traktorji in sadilniki, ... ... do hlevov za živali, opremljenih s premičnimi napravami za nastiljanje. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev
The main rural development regulation sets the standard aid rate for total public aid (that is from the EAFRD and national or regional public budgets) at 40 % of the eligible investment. 
Glavna uredba na področju razvoja podeželja določa standardno stopnjo skupne javne pomoči (iz EKSRP in nacionalnih ali regionalnih javnih sredstev) na 40 % upravičene naložbe.
Member States may set lower rates or maximum eligible costs, thereby limiting the aid. 
Države članice lahko določijo nižje stopnje javne pomoči ali najvišje upravičene stroške in s tem omejijo pomoč.
The standard aid rate may, however, be increased in particular circumstances. 
Standardna stopnja pomoči pa se v posebnih razmerah lahko poveča.
Thus, a young farmer may receive up to 50 % of the eligible investment. 
Tako lahko mladi kmet prejme do 50 % upravičene naložbe.
Farmers in mountainous areas, in other disadvantaged areas or in Natura 20005 areas may also receive an additional 10 %. 
Kmetje na goratih območjih, na drugih območjih z omejenimi možnostmi ali območjih Natura 20005 lahko prejmejo še dodatnih 10 %.
In exceptional cases (i.e. in outermost regions and the smaller Aegean islands), the aid rate may reach up to 75 %. 
Stopnja pomoči lahko v izjemnih primerih (tj. v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in na manjših Egejskih otokih) doseže do 75 %.
No minimum aid rate is defined by the EU regulations. 
Najnižja stopnja pomoči v uredbah EU ni opredeljena.
The Community strategic guidelines establish the EU priorities for improving the competitiveness of agriculture, which include modernisation, innovation and quality. 
Strateške smernice Skupnosti določajo prednostne naloge EU za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti kmetijstva, ki vključujejo posodabljanje, inovacije in kakovost.
The preamble to the main regulation, Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, states the purpose of investment aid for modernisation under measure 121 thus6: 5 ‘Natura 2000’ areas are specific protected areas of conservation. 
V preambuli glavne Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/20056 je naveden namen pomoči za naložbe za posodabljanje v okviru ukrepa 121: 5 Območja Natura 2000 so posebna zaščitena območja varstva.
6 Recital 21 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. 
21 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
7 Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. 
7 Člen 26 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
11 ‘the purpose of Community farm investment aid is to modernise agricultural holdings to improve their economic performance through better use of the production factors including the introduction of new technologies and innovation, targeting quality, organic products and on/off-farm diversification, including non-food sectors and energy crops, as well as improving the environmental, occupational safety, hygiene and animal welfare status of agricultural holdings.’ 11. 
11 „Namen pomoči Skupnosti naložbam v kmetijstvu je posodobiti kmetijska gospodarstva za povečanje njihove gospodarske učinkovitosti s pomočjo boljše uporabe proizvodnih dejavnikov, vključno z uvajanjem novih tehnologij in inovacij, usmerjanjem v kakovost, ekološko pridelavo ter diverzifikacijo kmetijskih in nekmetijskih dejavnosti, tudi v neživilskih sektorjih in z energetskimi pridelki, kot tudi za izboljšanje varovanja okolja, varstva pri delu ter higiene in dobrega počutja živali na kmetijskih gospodarstvih.“ 11.