natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
An open procurement procedure where all interested economic partners may submit a tender should have been used. 
Uporabiti bi bilo treba odprti postopek javnega naročanja, ki omogoča, da vsi zainteresirani gospodarski partnerji predložijo svoje ponudbe.
The OfficeŐs audited budgetary implementation report differs from the level of detail provided by most other agencies which demonstrates the need for clear guidelines on the agenciesŐ budget reporting. 
Revidirano poročilo Urada o izvrševanju proračuna ni enako podrobno kot pri večini drugih agencij, kar kaže, da agencije potrebujejo jasne smernice za poročanje o proračunu.
Carry-overs of committed appropriations for Title II (administrative expenditure) were high at 134 228 euro, i.e. 44 % (2014: 91 757 euro, i.e. 40 %). 
Prenosi odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti, so bili visoki za naslov II (upravni odhodki) in so znašali 134 228 EUR ali 44 % (2014: 91 757 EUR ali 40 %).
These carry-overs are mainly related to the delivery of services that go beyond 2015. 
Prenosi so se nanašali predvsem na storitve, zagotovljene po letu 2015.
(1) European Free Trade Association. 
(1) (2) (3) Evropsko združenje za prosto trgovino.
(2) In the case of purchase orders and low-value contracts the procurement rules limit the competition to one and three candidates, respectively. 
Pri naročilnicah in pogodbah majhne vrednosti pravila javnega naročanja omejujejo konkurenco na enega oziroma na tri kandidate.
(3) The total value of the contracts signed amounts to around 80 000 euro, whereas the threshold established by Article 137 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 is 60 000 euro. 
Skupna vrednost sklenjenih pogodb znaša približno 80 000 EUR, prag, določen v členu 137 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1268/2012, pa znaša 60 000 EUR.
C 417/36 Official Journal of the European Union 6.12.2017 THE BEREC OFFICE REPLY 18. 
C 417/36 Uradni list Evropske unije 6.12.2017 ODGOVOR URADA BEREC 18.
The host Member State Latvia does not have an accredited European School. 
V državi gostiteljici, Latviji, ni evropske šole.
The establishment of a new accredited European School is a long process, and in the meantime the BEREC Office has established direct contracts with schools providing education in English, French and German as a main language of instruction as an interim measure to ensure international schooling for the pupils of the staff in line with the Commission guidelines on staff policy in the European Regulatory Agencies (1). 
Ker je ustanovitev nove akreditirane evropske šole dolgotrajen proces, je urad BEREC kot začasno rešitev vzpostavil neposredne stike s šolami, ki zagotavljajo izobraževanje v angleščini, francoščini ali nemščini kot glavnim jezikom poučevanja, da se zagotovi mednarodno izobraževanje za otroke zaposlenih, kakor določajo smernice Komisije o politiki glede zaposlenih v evropskih regulativnih agencijah(1).
The BEREC Office agrees with the findings of the auditors that the use of framework service contracts is not appropriate for the BEREC OfficeŐs schooling situation and in future will use direct service agreements with the schools without procurement. 
Urad BEREC se strinja z opažanji revizorjev, da zanj uporaba okvirnih pogodb za storitve šolanja ni ustrezna, in bo v prihodnosti s šolami sklenil neposredne sporazume o storitvah brez postopka javnega naročanja.
The BEREC Office would appreciate updated Commission guidelines to take into account the specificities of schooling services. 
Urad želi, da bi posodobljene smernice Komisije upoštevale posebnosti storitev šolanja.
On the basis of the recommendations made by the Joint Reclassification Committee and based on the files of all temporary staff eligible for the reclassification, the Appointing Authority adopted the list of temporary staff members reclassified. 
Na podlagi priporočil Skupnega odbora za prerazvrščanje in na podlagi dosjejev vseh začasnih zaposlenih, upravičenih do prerazvrstitve, je organ za imenovanje sprejel seznam članov začasnega osebja, ki so bili prerazvrščeni.
In addition, on proposal from the Administrative Manager, the Appointing Authority agreed, after thorough consideration, to reclassify the jobholder in the step 2 of the higher grade instead of step 1, and respectively an ex ante exception has been registered according to the rules on handling deviations from the established financial rules and procedures. 
Poleg tega se je na predlog upravnega vodje organ za imenovanje po temeljitem premisleku strinjal, da prerazvrsti zaposlenega v drugo stopnjo višjega razreda namesto v prvo, kar je bilo kot ex ante izjema ustrezno zabeleženo v skladu s pravili o obravnavanju odklonov od obstoječih finančnih pravil in postopkov.
The BEREC Office widely agrees with the comment on the framework contract for human resource management services. 
Urad BEREC se strinja s pripombo o okvirnih pogodbah za storitve upravljanja kadrovskih virov.
The implementation of the first specific contract has already demonstrated some difficulties related to the fact that the award of the contract was exclusively based on pricing and not on the consultantŐs professional qualification and experience. 
Pri izvajanju prve posebne pogodbe so se že pokazale nekatere težave, povezane z dejstvom, da je oddaja javnega naročila temeljila izključno na ceni in ne na strokovnem znanju in izkušnjah svetovalca.
In full agreement with the remarks of the auditors, the BEREC Office has terminated the framework contract and will put in place a different strategy to obtain the necessary services. 
Urad BEREC se popolnoma strinja s pripombo revizorjev in je okvirno pogodbo prekinil ter bo za pridobitev potrebnih storitev uporabil drugačno strategijo.
The BEREC Office recognises that the high staff turnover is a risk factor, which has been recorded in the risk register as a significant risk, especially taking into account the small size of the Agency, which makes that high turnover has a more negative impact (the BEREC Office is the smallest decentralized EU Agency). 
Urad BEREC priznava, da je visoka fluktuacija zaposlenih dejavnik tveganja, ki je bilo zabeleženo v registru tveganj kot pomembno, zlasti ob upoštevanju majhnosti agencije, zaradi katere ima visoka fluktuacija zaposlenih še bolj negativen vpliv (urad BEREC ja najmanjša decentralizirana agencija EU).
The management is continuously working on the introduction of mitigation techniques but it must be emphasized that some structural and external horizontal elements affecting the turnover are outside the control of the BEREC Office, as they are stemming from the regional/local working environment of the BEREC Office. 
Vodstvo si nenehno prizadeva za uvedbo blažilnih ukrepov, toda poudariti je treba, da na nekatere strukturne in zunanje horizontalne dejavnike, ki vplivajo na fluktuacijo zaposlenih, urad nima vpliva, saj izhajajo iz njegovega regionalnega/ lokalnega okolja.
The recent net salary decrease, a result of the continuous decreasing of the correction coefficient for Latvia, increased the risk factor. 
Nedavno neto znižanje plače, ki je posledica nepretrganega zniževanja korekcijskega koeficienta za Latvijo, je tveganje še povečalo.
Any action taken or planned by the BEREC Office to improve the situation can only mitigate the risk and in order to properly tackle the issue of the retention of staff, an external intervention, especially on the current system of correction coefficients, should be implemented. 
Kateri koli ukrep, ki ga urad uvede ali načrtuje, lahko tveganja le blaži, da pa bi se ustrezno lotili problema, kako zadržati osebje, bi bilo treba ukrepati od zunaj, zlasti glede trenutnega sistema izračunavanja korekcijskih koeficientov.
The BEREC Office has cooperated with the Commission for the preparation of the evaluation report envisaged in Article 25 of its founding regulation and is ready to cooperate with the Commission for future evaluations. 
Urad BEREC je s Komisijo sodeloval pri pripravi poročila o oceni, kakor je predvideno v členu 25 njegove ustanovne uredbe, in je tudi pri prihodnjih ocenah pripravljen sodelovati z njo.
The BEREC Office will comply with any requirements in that area which could be introduced by the legislator. 
Urad BEREC bo upošteval katere koli zahteve na tem področju, ki bi jih morda uvedel zakonodajalec.
The BEREC regulation is currently under review and the Commission proposal includes a specific provision on recurring evaluation every five years. 
Uredba urada BEREC je trenutno v pregledu, predlog Komisije pa vključuje posebno določbo o rednem ocenjevanju vsakih pet let.
(1) COM(2005) 5304 EN 
(1) COM(2005) 5304 SL
2018 Future of the CAP Briefing Paper March 2018 
SL 2018 Prihodnost skupne kmetijske politike Kratko poročilo Sodišča Marec 2018
CONTENTS Paragraph Executive summary I-V Introduction 1-6 Topic and purpose 1-4 Approach and presentation 5-6 Key data and trends relevant to the farming sector and rural areas 7-18 CAP spending over the last decade has been stable and focused on income support 7-8 Fewer but larger farms (and a smaller workforce) produce a constant value of outputs, leading to increased incomes per full-time person 9-10 EU food prices have converged with world prices and the EU has become a net exporter of food 11 The average age of farm managers has increased, and the land data are inconsistent 12-13 Insufficient progress on environmental care and climate action 14-16 Economic differences between rural and other areas have become less significant 17-18 Our review 19-49 CAP needs 20-26 Insufficient information to identify needs 20-23 Lack of clarity on EU value added 24 Responding to long-term trends 25 The CAP’s impact on fairness and the single market 26 CAP Objectives 27-30 Insufficient clarity and specificity of objectives 28 Need for consistency with other EU objectives 29-30 2 
KAZALO Odstavek Povzetek I–V Uvod 1–6 Tema in namen 1–4 Pristop in predstavitev 5–6 Ključni podatki in trendi, pomembni za kmetijski sektor in podeželska območja 7–18 V zadnjem desetletju je bila poraba za SKP stabilna in osredotočena na dohodkovno podporo 7–8 Manj kmetij, ki pa so večje, (in manj delavcev) ustvarja stalno vrednost proizvodnje, kar vodi do večjih dohodkov na osebo, prikazano z ekvivalentom polnega delovnega časa 9–10 Cene hrane v EU so se približale svetovnim cenam, EU pa je postala neto izvoznica hrane 11 Povprečna starost upraviteljev kmetijskih gospodarstev se je zvišala, podatki o zemljiščih pa se ne ujemajo 12–13 Nezadosten napredek na področju skrbi za okolje in podnebnih ukrepov 14–16 Ekonomske razlike med podeželskimi in drugimi območji so postale manj pomembne 17–18 Pregled Sodišča 19–49 Potrebe v zvezi s SKP 20–26 Za opredelitev potreb ni dovolj informacij 20–23 Nejasnost v zvezi z dodano vrednostjo EU 24 Odziv na dolgoročne trende 25 Vpliv SKP na pravičnost in enotni trg 26 Cilji SKP 27–30 Cilji niso dovolj jasni niti dovolj specifični 28 Potreba po skladnosti z drugimi cilji EU 29–30 2
CAP Inputs The allocation of funds is not sufficiently based on needs or expected EU value added CAP Processes Better and quicker information needed to design cost-effective CAP instruments Achieving consistency between the CAP and other EU policies and between different CAP instruments Simplification needed, but not at the cost of effectiveness Sufficient time must be allowed to roll out the next CAP reform CAP outputs, outcomes and external factors Need for an effective performance system linking outputs, results, impacts and objectives Link between money paid and achievement of agreed performance targets Policy should be monitored and – when necessary – adjusted Accountability for the CAP Criteria and implications for assessing future policy Annex I – List of ECA publications supporting this briefing paper Annex II – Treaty CAP objectives 31-34 31-34 35-42 35-37 38-40 41 42 43-48 43-46 47 48 49 50-66 3 
Vložki pri SKP Dodelitev sredstev ne temelji dovolj na potrebah ali pričakovani dodani vrednosti EU Procesi pri SKP Za pripravo stroškovno učinkovitih instrumentov SKP so potrebne boljše in ažurnejše informacije Doseganje skladnosti med SKP in drugimi politikami EU ter med različnimi instrumenti SKP Potrebna je poenostavitev, vendar ne na račun uspešnosti Zagotoviti je treba dovolj časa za uvedbo naslednje reforme SKP Izložki, izidi in zunanji dejavniki pri SKP Potreben je uspešen sistem zagotavljanja smotrnosti, ki povezuje izložke, rezultate, učinke in cilje Povezava med plačili in doseganjem dogovorjenih ciljev v zvezi s smotrnostjo Politiko bi bilo treba spremljati in po potrebi prilagajati Odgovornost za SKP Merila za ocenjevanje prihodnjih politik in njihove posledice Priloga I: Seznam objav Evropskega računskega sodišča, na katerih temelji to kratko poročilo Priloga II: Cilji za SKP v Pogodbi 31–34 31–34 35–42 35–37 38–40 41 42 43–48 43–46 47 48 49 50–66 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is up for review, as the current seven-year planning period for EU finances and policy implementation ends in 2020. 
POVZETEK I. Skupno kmetijsko politiko EU (SKP) bi bilo treba pregledati, saj se bo sedanje sedemletno obdobje finančnega načrtovanja in izvajanja politik EU končalo leta 2020.
In November 2017 the Commission published a Communication on the future of food and farming, which presents its thinking on the post-2020 CAP. 
Komisija je novembra 2017 objavila sporočilo z naslovom Prihodnost preskrbe s hrano in kmetijstva, v katerem je predstavljeno njeno razmišljanje o SKP po letu 2020.
This briefing paper is our response to the Commission’s Communication. 
To kratko poročilo je odziv Sodišča na sporočilo Komisije.
In this document we analyse key trends and data relevant to agriculture and rural areas, present our views on the current CAP, and discuss criteria and key challenges for the new CAP. 
Sodišče v tem dokumentu analizira ključne trende in podatke, pomembne za kmetijstvo in podeželska območja, predstavlja svoja mnenja o sedanji SKP ter razpravlja o merilih in ključnih izzivih v zvezi z novo SKP.
The Communication takes into account a number of recommendations the ECA has made over several years. 
V sporočilu so upoštevana številna priporočila, ki jih je Evropsko računsko sodišče predlagalo v več letih.
It sets out an ambition to deliver a new performance-based framework. 
Predstavljeno je tudi prizadevanje za zagotovitev novega okvira, ki temelji na smotrnosti.
However we note that some of the statistics underlying the Communication do not meet the criteria we have set out in previous reports, and that the measures supported are, on the basis of the Communication, likely to be similar to those supported in the past. 
Vendar Sodišče ugotavlja, da nekateri statistični podatki, na katerih temelji sporočilo, ne izpolnjujejo meril, ki jih je Sodišče določilo v prejšnjih poročilih, in da bodo – sodeč po sporočilu – podprti ukrepi verjetno podobni ukrepom, ki so bili podprti v preteklosti.
A key element of the Communication is advocacy of a “new delivery model” – based on increased flexibility and subsidiarity and giving Member States more responsibility for performance. 
Eden od ključnih elementov sporočila je podpora novemu izvedbenemu modelu, ki temelji na večji fleksibilnosti in subsidiarnosti, državam članicam pa zagotavlja več odgovornosti glede smotrnosti.
In our view, the success of the new delivery model requires: • Measures designed on the basis of solid scientific and statistical evidence demonstrating that they will deliver desired results; • The new “CAP strategic plans” setting relevant, ambitious and verifiable targets that are aligned with EU objectives; • A robust performance monitoring and evaluation framework; and • A solid accountability and audit chain providing assurance on both compliance and performance. 
Sodišče meni, da so za uspešnost novega izvedbenega modela potrebni: 4 • • • • ukrepi, zasnovani na podlagi trdnih strokovnih in statističnih dokazov o zagotavljanju potrebnih rezultatov, novi strateški načrti SKP, ki določajo ustrezne, velikopotezne in preverljive ciljne vrednosti, ki so usklajene s cilji EU, trden okvir za spremljanje in vrednotenje smotrnosti ter trdno verigo odgovornosti in revidiranja, ki zagotavlja tako skladnost kot smotrnost.
V. The Commission’s Communication does not represent a proposal. 
V. Sporočilo Komisije še ni predlog.
The criteria set out in this briefing paper will inform our future review of the Commission’s proposal when that is published. 
Potem ko bo predlog Komisije objavljen, ga bo Sodišče pregledalo na podlagi meril, določenih v tem kratkem poročilu.
We envisage that the review will then lead to an opinion on the final proposal. 4 
Sodišče predvideva, da bo nato na podlagi pregleda pripravilo mnenje o končnem predlogu. 5
INTRODUCTION Topic and purpose 1. 
UVOD Tema in namen 1.
The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is up for review, as the current seven-year planning period for EU finances and policy implementation ends in 2020. 
Skupno kmetijsko politiko EU (SKP) bi bilo treba pregledati, saj se bo sedanje sedemletno obdobje finančnega načrtovanja in izvajanja politik EU končalo leta 2020.
The Commission intends to present its legislative proposal for the next CAP together with an impact assessment in May 2018. 
Komisija namerava zakonodajni predlog za naslednjo SKP predstaviti maja 2018 skupaj z oceno učinka.
A key step in preparing the CAP reform for the period after 2020 came in November 2017, when the Commission published a Communication on the future of food and farming1. 
Ključni korak pri pripravi reforme SKP za obdobje po letu 2020 je bil narejen novembra 2017, ko je Komisija objavila sporočilo z naslovom Prihodnost preskrbe s hrano in kmetijstva1.
When the Commission announced its intention to issue the communication, we planned a high priority task to react to it in our 2018 Work Programme. 
Ko je Komisija napovedala, da namerava objaviti sporočilo, je Sodišče med svoje prednostne naloge v delovnem programu za leto 2018 vključilo pripravo odziva nanj.
On 6 December 2017, we also received a request for such a reaction from the Commissioner responsible, Mr Hogan. 
Sodišče je 6. decembra 2017 od pristojnega komisarja Phila Hogana prejelo tudi prošnjo za ta odziv.
The Communication focuses on: • continuation of direct support to farmers, but with greater use of risk management tools and initiatives to increase farmers’ market rewards; • contributing more to EU environmental and climate objectives; • attention to the “socio-economic fabric” of rural areas; • greater focus on sustainable agricultural production, health, nutrition, food waste and animal welfare; • better use of research, innovation and technology, and financial instruments; and • a new delivery model based on greater flexibility and subsidiarity – giving Member States more responsibility for performance. 
Sporočilo je osredotočeno na: • nadaljevanje neposredne podpore kmetom, vendar z večjo uporabo orodij za obvladovanje tveganja in spodbud za boljše nagrajevanje kmetov na trgu, • večji prispevek k okoljskim in podnebnim ciljem EU, • namenjanje pozornosti družbeno-ekonomskemu tkivu podeželskih območij, • dajanje večjega poudarka trajnostni kmetijski proizvodnji, zdravju, prehrani, zavrženi hrani in dobrobiti živali, • boljšo uporabo raziskav, inovacij in tehnologij ter finančnih instrumentov in • nov izvedbeni model, ki temelji na večji prožnosti in subsidiarnosti ter tako državam članicam zagotavlja večjo odgovornost glede smotrnosti.
However, drawing on our audit experience, we can offer advice to EU policymakers COM(2017) 713 final : Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – The Future of Food and Farming. 5 1 
Prav to je namen tega dokumenta, ki COM(2017) 713 final, Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Prihodnost preskrbe s hrano in kmetijstva. 6 1
This is the purpose of this paper, which is our response to the Commission’s Communication on the future of food and farming. This is not an audit report. It is a review based on publicly available information. 
je odziv Sodišča na sporočilo Komisije z naslovom Prihodnost preskrbe s hrano in kmetijstva. Dokument ni revizijsko poročilo, ampak pregled na podlagi javno objavljenih informacij.
Approach and presentation 5. 
Pristop in predstavitev 5.
Our views expressed in this briefing paper2 are based on: • our previous work; • reviews of external reports and consultation with external experts; • discussions with the relevant Directorates-General of the Commission3. 
Mnenja Sodišča, ki so izražena v tem kratkem poročilu2, temeljijo na: • prejšnjem delu Sodišča, • pregledih zunanjih poročil in posvetovanjih z zunanjimi strokovnjaki, • razpravah z zadevnimi generalnimi direktorati Komisije3.
In this briefing paper, we present: • key data and trends relevant to the farming sector and rural areas; • our views on the current CAP; • conclusions, including a set of criteria for assessing the CAP legislative proposal and the resulting future policy, and key challenges for the post-2020 CAP. 
Sodišče v tem kratkem poročilu predstavlja: • ključne podatke in trende, pomembne za kmetijski sektor in podeželska območja, • svoja mnenja o sedanji SKP, • zaključke, vključno s sklopom meril za ocenjevanje zakonodajnega predloga SKP in prihodnje politike na njegovi podlagi ter ključnimi izzivi za SKP po letu 2020.
KEY DATA AND TRENDS RELEVANT TO THE FARMING SECTOR AND RURAL AREAS CAP spending over the last decade has been stable and focused on income support 7. 
KLJUČNI PODATKI IN TRENDI, POMEMBNI ZA KMETIJSKI SEKTOR IN PODEŽELSKA OBMOČJA V zadnjem desetletju je bila poraba za SKP stabilna in osredotočena na dohodkovno podporo 7.
Since 2006, EU budgeted spending on the CAP has averaged €54 billion per year. 
Od leta 2006 je poraba iz proračuna EU za SKP znašala povprečno 54 milijard EUR na leto.
In nominal terms, the CAP budget has remained relatively stable (see Figure 1). 
V nominalnem smislu je proračun za SKP ostal razmeroma stabilen (glej sliko 1).
A briefing paper is a review product, not an audit product. As such, it does not involve new audit work, but is based on published audit findings, conclusions and recommendations, and other publicly available information. 
Kratko poročilo je pregled in ne revizija, zato ne vključuje novega revizijskega dela, ampak temelji na objavljenih revizijskih ugotovitvah, sklepih in priporočilih ter drugih javno objavljenih informacijah.
Annex I provides a full list of our publications referred to in this paper. 
Priloga I vsebuje popoln seznam objav Sodišča, na katere se sklicuje ta dokument.
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Directorate-General for Climate Action, Directorate-General for Environment, Eurostat, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. 
Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, Generalni direktorat za podnebno politiko, Generalni direktorat za okolje, Eurostat, Generalni direktorat za regionalno in mestno politiko ter Generalni direktorat za zdravje in varnost hrane.
Figure 1 – The CAP budget has been stable over several years Source: ECA, based on EU budgets. 8. 
Slika 1 – Proračun za SKP je že več let stabilen Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi proračunov EU 8.
Around 72 % of the CAP budget is spent on direct payments to farmers, and so supports their incomes. 
Približno 72 % proračuna za SKP se porabi za neposredna plačila kmetom, s čimer se podpirajo njihovi dohodki.
These payments are generally paid per hectare of agricultural land, for the most part without a link to production, and with little decrease in support paid per hectare as farm size increases. 
Ta plačila so običajno izvršena po hektaru kmetijskega zemljišča in večinoma niso povezana s proizvodnjo, podpora na hektar pa se le malo zmanjša, če so kmetije večje.
Around 22 % is spent on rural development measures, half of which are also paid to farmers on a per hectare basis. 
Približno 22 % proračunskih sredstev se porabi za ukrepe za razvoj podeželja. Polovica teh sredstev se kmetom prav tako izplača na podlagi števila hektarov.