natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There is room for improvement in the CommissionŐs rules concerning on-the-spot checks andpenalties.......................................................... . 
Premije za govedo, ki so predmet kontrol v okviru integriranega administrativnega inkontrolnegasistema ...............................................
FINDINGS CONCERNING THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SYSTEM AT COMMUNITY LEVEL Absenceofpreciserulesonthemanagementofnationaldatabases................ . 
IzredniukrepipodporezatrggovejegamesapokriziBSE....................
TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 
ZAKLJUČKIINPRIPOROČILA .................................................
31 4.2.2005 Paragraph Page I-X 3 1-6 4 1-3 4 4-6 4 7-32 5 7-10 5 11-17 9 18-26 9 27-32 12 27 12 28 13 29-31 13 32 13 33-46 13 33-34 13 35-37 13 38-39 14 40-41 15 42-46 17 47-78 18 47-54 18 55-64 20 65-71 22 72-77 24 72-74 24 75-77 24 78-91 25 92-99 29 
31 Odstavek Stran I–IX 3 1–6 4 1–3 4 4–6 4 7–26 5 7–10 5 11–17 9 18–26 9 27–32 12 27 12 28 13 29–31 13 32 13 33–46 13 33–34 13 35–37 13 38–39 14 40–41 15 42–46 17 47–77 18 47–54 18 55–64 20 65–71 22 72–77 24 72–74 24 75–77 24 78–91 25 92–99 29
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. Identifying and registering the bovine herd is an essential prerequisite in guaranteeing the traceability of beef and veal and is also an element in the conditions attached to the various bovine premiums. These premiums amounted to more than 7 000 million euro in 2002 and more than 8 000 million euro in 2004. 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije POVZETEK I. Identifikacija in registracija goveda sta bistvenega pomena za zagotavljanje izsledljivosti govejega mesa in pomembna pogoja za uspešno dodeljevanje različnih premij za govedorejo, ki so leta 2002 znašale več kot 7 milijard eurov, leta 2004 pa več kot 8 milijard eurov.
The main objective of the audit was to evaluate the cattle identification and registration system, at the Commission (design, implementation controls and follow-up) and in the Member States (operational system allowing effective monitoring of animals from birth until slaughter and allowing verification of correct payment of all direct aid). 
Glavni cilj revizije je bil oceniti sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda na ravni Komisije (oblikova-nje, opravljanje kontrol in izvajanje popravljalnih ukrepov) in na ravni držav članic (operativni sistem, ki zagotavlja učinkovit nadzor živali od rojstva do zakola in omogoča ugotavljanje, ali so bila vsa izplačila neposredne pomoči izvedena pravilno).
The audit was carried out in the four Member States with the largest bovine herds (Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom). 
Revizija je bila opravljena v štirih državah članicah z največjim staležem goveda (Nemčiji, Franciji, Italiji in Združenem kraljestvu).
The identification system has four components: ear tags, passports, herd registers and the computerised database containing the details of all cattle. 
Sistem identifikacije je sestavljen iz štirih delov: ušesnih znamk, potnih listov, registrov staleža in računalniške podatkovne baze, ki vsebuje podrobnosti o vsem govedu.
This database is one component of the system and was to be operational on 31 December 1999 at the latest. 
Ta podatkovna baza je eden izmed sestavnih delov sistema in bi morala biti vzpostavljena do 31. decembra 1999.
Cattle identification and registration systems were set up in the four Member States more than two years after the target date of 31 December 1999 and still have some weaknesses. 
Sistemi identifikacije in registracije goveda so bili v teh štirih državah članicah uvedeni več kot dve leti po ciljnem datumu 31. decembru 1999 in imajo še vedno določene pomanjkljivosti.
For example, the passports of animals traded between Member States are not monitored, there is no exchange of information between national databases, there are delays in updating the databases and the level of reliability of the information contained in the databases must often be considered inadequate. 
Na primer, potnih listov živali, s katerimi se trguje med državami članicami, se ne pregleduje; ni izmenjave podatkov med nacionalnimi podatkovnimi bazami; pri sprotnem dopolnjevanju podatkovnih baz prihaja do zamud, zato je stopnja zanesljivosti podatkov v teh bazah pogosto neprimerna.
The main finding is that the cattle identification and registration system that was designed does not guarantee the traceability of intra-Community or extra-Community cattle movements. 
Glavna ugotovitev je, da obstoječi sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda ne zagotavlja izsledljivosti gibanj goveda v Skupnosti in zunaj nje.
These movements nevertheless involve approximately three million head of cattle per year (approximately 4 % of the herd). 
Vendar pa ta gibanja obsegajo približno 3 milijone glav govedi na leto (približno 4 % staleža).
V. The general framework of the system was laid down by the Parliament and the Council. 
V. Splošni okvir sistema sta določila Evropski parlament in Svet EU.
The Commission was given the task of implementing certain components of the system, but responsibility for implementing the system lies with the Member States. 
Komisija je imela nalogo, da oblikuje določene elemente sistema, vendar pa so za njegovo izvrševanje odgovorne države članice.
The legislation did not include procedures for Member States to exchange data on cattle movements and the exchange was in any case compromised by the fact that data format varies from one Member State to another. 
V zakonodajo niso vključeni postopki, na podlagi katerih naj bi države članice izmenjevale podatke o gibanju goveda in izmenjava je bila v vseh primerih okrnjena, saj se formati podatkov posameznih držav članic razlikujejo.
All attempts to reconcile information from the various databases have failed. 
Vsi poskusi uskladitve podatkov iz različnih podatkovnih baz so se izjalovili.
The Member States interpreted certain elements of Community regulations in different ways, in respect of the deadlines for tagging and reporting, the fundamental concept of Ôkeeper of bovine animalsŐ and return of animal passports. 
Države članice so si nekatere določbe uredb Skupnosti razlagale različno, in sicer določbe v zvezi z roki za označevanje in poročanje, samim konceptom „imetnik goveda“ ter vrnitvijo potnega lista živali.
The Commission was not given responsibility for adopting implementing measures for setting up and checking the databases. 
Komisija ni bila pooblaščena za sprejem ukrepov za izvajanje v zvezi z oblikovanjem in preverjanjem podatkovnih baz.
This explains, in part, the differences found between the Member States. 
To deloma pojasnjuje ugotovljene razlike med državami članicami.
The control and penalty systems in place have not been adapted to ensure that they are appropriate to the various keepers of cattle, such as traders, assembly centres or slaughterhouses. 
Veljavni sistemi kontrol in kaznovanja niso prirejeni različnim imetnikom goveda, kot so trgovci, zbirni centri in klavnice.
In addition, the databases contain certain data, such as retagging rates and delays in registration, which the Member States do not use as control instruments. 
Poleg tega podatkovne baze vsebujejo določene podatke, kot so zamude pri registraciji in takse za ponovno označevanje, ki jih države članice ne uporabljajo kot instrumente kontrol.
Control practices also vary greatly from one Member State to another. 
Tudi kontrolne prakse se od države do države zelo razlikujejo.
As far as checks on the implementation and monitoring of the cattle identification and registration system are concerned, the Commission has interpreted its own role in a restrictive manner and has given no guidance on the setting-up of the databases. 
V zvezi s kontrolo izvajanja in nadzora sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda je Komisija svojo vlogo razumela v omejenem pomenu in ni poskrbela za navodila za oblikovanje podatkovnih baz.
No standardised management rules have been issued and no quality indicator has been developed as regards the operation of the databases. 
Ni določila standardiziranih upravljavskih pravil, niti kazalcev kakovosti, povezanih z delovanjem podatkovnih baz.
The procedures for recognising the Ôfully operational characterŐ of the databases are unsatisfactory and the CommissionŐs role is too often limited to confirming the technical existence of the databases, without evaluating their actual operation on the basis of precise management rules or predefined quality indicators. 
Postopki za priznanje „popolnoma operativnega značaja“ podatkovnih baz so nezadostni in vloga Komisije je vse prepogosto omejena na priznanje tehničnega obstoja podatkovnih baz, ocene njihovega dejanskega delovanja na podlagi natančnih upravljavskih pravil ali vnaprej določenih kazalcev kakovosti pa niso podane.
The Commission should be given adequate resources to take on a genuine guiding role in the system, in particular by drawing up standardised management rules, quality indicators and a format for the exchange of data between national databases. 
Komisiji bi bilo treba dodeliti primerna sredstva za prevzem dejanske vodilne vloge pri tem sistemu, še zlasti z uvedbo standardiziranih upravljavskih pravil, kazalcev kakovosti in formata za izmenjavo podatkov med nacionalnimi podatkovnimi bazami.
The exchange of data between Member States, and even with third countries, should be organised with a view to retaining control over intra-Community and extra-Community movements. 
Izmenjava podatkov med državami članicami in celo s tretjimi državami bi morala biti organizirana z vidika ohranitve nadzora nad gibanji v Skupnosti in zunaj nje.
C 29/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 IX. 
C 29/4 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.2.2005 UVOD IX.
The administrative checks applied in the various Member States should also be compared and specifications provided for cross-checks to be carried out between the identification and registration databases and the IACS databases before the various premiums are paid. 
Treba bi bilo tudi primerjati administrativne kontrole, ki se izvajajo v različnih državah članicah in izvesti specifikacije za navzkrižna preverjanja med podatkovnimi bazami identifikacije in registracije ter podatkovnimi bazami integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema, in sicer preden se izplačajo različne premije.
The system of on-the-spot checks should also be reviewed, including the penalty mechanisms, and specific approaches for the different types of keepers of cattle should be drawn up and an approach imposed which is fully integrated with IACS. 
Poleg tega bi bilo treba revidirati sistem kontrol na kraju samem, vključno z mehanizmi za izrekanje kazni, in predvideti specifične pristope za različne vrste imetnikov goveda ter določiti pristop, ki je v celoti skladen z integriranim administrativnim in kontrolnim sistemom. integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema (IAKS) (3).
INTRODUCTION General context 1. 
Splošni kontekst 1.
The specific regulation concerning the identification and registration of bovine animals (1) (cattle), on the one hand, establishes a system for the identification and registration of cattle at the production stage and, on the other, creates a specific Community labelling system in the beef sector. 
Posebna uredba o identifikaciji in registraciji goveda (1) na eni strani uvaja sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda na stopnji proizvodnje ter na drugi strani poseben sistem označevanja Skupnosti na področju govejega mesa.
These two systems are interdependent: the fact that cattle can be traced by means of the identification and registration system is a prerequisite for guaranteeing the safety of the food chain through the labelling system. 
Ta dva sistema sta sood-visna; pravzaprav je sledljivost goved s sistemom identifikacije in registracije predpogoj, da se s sistemom označevanja zagotovi varnost prehranske verige.
Veterinary and health reasons, and some of the requirements relating to the management of a number of Community animal premium schemes, all demand an efficient system of cattle identification and registration. 
Veterinarski in zdravstveni razlogi ter zahteve na področju upravljanja nekaterih programov živalskih premij Skupnosti govorijo v prid sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda.
This report focuses on the cattle identification and registration system and does not deal with the labelling of the marketed products. 
To poročilo obravnava le sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda ter se ne ukvarja z označevanjem proizvodov na trgu.
The system comprises ear tags as a means of identifying individual animals, animal passports, individual registers kept on each holding and computerised databases set up by the Member States. 
Sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda je sestavljen iz ušesnih znamk za posamezno identifikacijo živali, potnih listov za živali, posameznih registrov, ki se vodijo na vsakem kmetijskem gospodarstvu, in računalniških podatkovnih baz, ki jih vzpostavijo države članice.
The computerised databases, which were to be set up by all Member States by 31 December 1999, are an important part of the system. 
Računalniške podatkovne baze, ki bi jih vse države članice morale vzpostaviti do 31. decembra 1999, so pomemben element sistema.
They must contain all the data on all the movements of all cattle from birth through to slaughter. 
Te podatkovne baze morajo vsebovati vse podatke o vsakem premiku posameznega goveda od njegove skotitve do zakola.
(2) The preamble to Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (OJ L 117, 7.5.1997 p. 
1760/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. julija 2000 o uvedbi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo govedi ter o označevanju govejega mesa in proizvodov iz govejega mesa in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 820/97 (UL L 204, 11.8.2000, str.
1) states, ÔWhereas Article 3(1)(c) of Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market states that animals for intra-Community trade must be identified in accordance with the requirements of Community rules and be registered in such a way that the original or transit holding, centre or organisation can be tracedŐ. context of the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) (3). 
820/97 z dne 21. julija 1997 o uvedbi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo govedi ter o označevanju govejega mesa in proizvodov iz govejega mesa, „člen 3(1)(c) Direktive Sveta 90/425/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o veterinarskih in zootehničnih pregledih v trgovini med državami članicami Skupnosti za nekatere žive živali in proizvode za dokončno vzpostavitev notranjega trga navaja, da je treba živali za trgovino med državami članicami Skupnosti označevati v skladu z zahtevami pravil, ki veljajo v Skupnosti, in jih registrirati tako, da je možna sledljivost do izvornega ali tranzitnega gospodarstva, središča ali organiza-cije“ (UL L 117, 7.5.1997, str.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/5 6. 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 29/5 6.
The audit also evaluated the level of the systemŐs development in four Member States, namely Germany (Bavaria and Saxony), France, Italy and the United Kingdom (Great Britain) (see paragraphs 78 to 91). 
Revizija je ocenila tudi stopnjo razvoja sistema v štirih državah članicah, in sicer v Nemčiji (Bavarska in Saška), Franciji, Italiji in Združenem kraljestvu (Velika Britanija) (glej odstavke 78–91).
The aim was to examine the implementation of the system by checking that the proposed system ensures that cattle are traceable on the European level, thus making it possible for all movements of cattle to be tracked from birth or importation from a third country through to slaughter or export from the European Union. 
Cilj je bil preučiti izvajanje sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda ter preveriti, ali predlagani sistem zagotavlja sledljivost goveda na evropski ravni, kar omogoča spremljanje vseh premikov goveda od njegove skotitve ali uvoza iz tretje države do zakola ali izvoza iz Evropske unije.
In 2002, 64 % of the EU bovine herd was to be found in the four Member States visited and they received almost 59 % of bovine premiums. 
Leta 2002 so štiri obiskane države imele 64 % staleža goved EU in prejele okoli 59 % premij za govedorejo.
The audit also took into consideration the CommissionŐs work and, in particular, the reports on inspections in the Member States. 
Pri reviziji se je prav tako upoštevalo delo Komisije in zlasti poročila o inšpekcijskih pregledih v državah članicah.
GENESIS AND EVOLUTION OF THE SYSTEM Size of the bovine sector 7. 
NASTANEK IN RAZVOJ SISTEMA Obseg področja govedoreje 7.
According to the survey carried out by Eurostat, there were 81,1 million head of cattle in the European Union in May/June 2002 (1). 
Po raziskavi, ki jo je opravil Eurostat, je imela Evropska unija maja/junija 2002 81,1 milijona glav goveda (1).
France, with 20,5 million head, had more than a quarter of the European herd, followed by Germany and the United Kingdom with 14,0 and 10,4 million head respectively, i.e. 17,3 and 12,8 % of the European herd. 
Francija je z 20,5 milijona glav imela več kot četrtino evropskega staleža. Sledili sta ji Nemčija in Združeno kraljestvo s 14,0 oziroma 10,4 milijona glav, kar je 17,3 % in 12,8 % evropskega staleža.
ItalyŐs herd, like that of Ireland, numbered more than 7,2 million head (8,9 %) and SpainŐs more than 6 million (see diagram 1). 8. 
Stalež v Italiji in na Irskem je štel več kot 7,2 milijona glav (8,9 %), v Španiji pa več kot 6 milijonov (glej prikaz 1).
Intra-Community movements are relatively extensive, whereas trade with third countries appears more limited. 
Gibanja znotraj Skupnosti so sorazmerno obsežna, medtem ko se zdi trgovina s tretjimi državami bolj okrnjena.
In 2001 almost three million cattle were involved in intra-Community and extra-Community trade, which represents around 4 % of the European herd (see diagrams 2 and 3). 
Leta 2001 je bilo v trgovino znotraj Skupnosti in zunaj nje vključenih okoli 3 milijone goved, kar je okoli 4 % evropskega staleža (glej prikaza 2 in 3).
According to the information available, exits of cattle were very considerable in the case of France (1,4 million animals) and Germany (0,5 million animals). 
Po razpoložljivih podatkih je zelo veliko živali zapustilo Francijo (1,4 milijona goved) in Nemčijo (0,5 milijona go-ved).
These two Member States account for more than 75 % of exits to other Community countries. 
Ti dve državi članici predstavljata več kot 75 % vseh pošiljk živali v druge države Skupnosti.
In contrast, exits of animals to other Member States involved fewer than 25 animals in the case of Finland, the United Kingdom, Portugal and Greece. 
Na drugi strani pa je iz Finske, Združenega kraljestva, Portugalske in Grčije v druge države članice odšlo manj kot 25 glav goveda.
The same phenomenon was observed in the case of entries, where Italy (1,3 million animals), Spain (0,5 million), the Netherlands (0,4 million) and France (0,2 million) recorded 93 % of entries from other Member States. 
Isti pojav je bilo opaziti pri vstopih, kjer so Italija (1,3 milijona glav goveda), Španija (0,5 mi-lijona), Nizozemska (0,4 milijona) in Francija (0,2 milijona) zabeležile 93 % vstopov živali iz drugih držav članic.
The 11 other Member States registered less than 7 % of intra-Community entries. 
Enajst drugih držav članic je zabeležilo manj kot 7 % vstopov živali iz drugih držav članic Skupnosti.
The variations observed in respect of cattle flow are a reflection of the specific characteristics of the beef and veal sector in the different Member States. 
Opažene razlike v zvezi s tokovi goveda so odraz posebnih značilnosti sektorja govejega in telečjega mesa v različnih državah članicah.
For example, France is renowned for the large number of beef farms specialising in the production of young animals for sale to other Member States, where they are fattened. 
Tako je Francija znana po velikem številu govejih farm, specializiranih za proizvodnjo mladih goved za prodajo v druge države članice, kjer se potem spitajo.
Italy, which has a deficit in beef, is a particular case in point. 
Tak primer je Italija, ki ima primanjkljaj govejega in telečjega mesa.
(1) Eurostat, Statistics in Focus, Agriculture and Fisheries, Theme 5 - 10/2001, bovine herd survey of November/December 2000. 
(1) Eurostat, Statistika na kratko, Kmetijstvo in ribištvo, tema 5–10/2001, raziskava o staležu goveda iz novembra/decembra 2000.
Diagram 1 Overview of EU bovine herd in million head (2002 bovine herd survey) C 29/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 Diagram 2 Source: Comext database (extracted in January 2003). 
C 29/6 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.2.2005 Nemčija 486 332 Španija 94 909 Izstopi znotraj Skupnosti: Izstopi izven Skupnosti: Skupaj izstopi: 2 450 140 glav 169 387 glav 2 619 527 Francija 1 383 615 Vir: Podatkovna baza Comext (izvleček iz januarja 2003).
Source: Comext database (extracted in January 2003). 
Španija 463 685 Italija 1 257 212 Vstopi s poreklom iz tretjih držav: 438 714 Vir: Podatkovna baza Comext (izvleček iz januarja 2003).
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/7 9. 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 29/7 9.
Budgetary expenditure on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal, which is constantly increasing, came to 4 600 million euro, i.e. 11,5 % of total expenditure on agriculture, in 1999, and to 7 100 million euro, i.e. 16,4 % of agricultural expenditure, in 2002. 
Proračunski izdatki za skupno ureditev trga za goveje in telečje meso, ki stalno naraščajo, so se leta 1999 povečali na 4,6 milijarde eurov ali 11,5 % skupnih izdatkov za kmetijstvo ter kmetijstvo.
The budget provision for 2004 totalled 8 100 million euro, i.e. 17,2 % of total expenditure on agriculture (see table 1). 
Za leto 2004 proračun predvideva 8,1 milijarde eurov ali 17,2 % skupnih izdatkov za kmetijstvo (glej tabelo 1).
10. lion euro in 1999 to 6 000 million euro in 2002, i.e. 80,7 % and 84,4 % respectively of total expenditure on beef and veal. 
Izdatki, povezani z neposrednimi pomočmi, so se s 3,7 milijarde eurov leta 1999 povečali na 6,0 milijarde eurov leta 2002 oziroma z 80,7 % na 84,4 % skupnih izdatkov za goveje in telečje meso.
The budget for 2004 provides for a further increase in direct aid to 7 300 million euro, i.e. 90,2 % of total expenditure on beef and 
Proračun za leto 2004 predvideva dodatno povečanje neposrednih pomoči na 7,3 milijarde eurov ali 90,2 % skupnih izdatkov za goveje in telečje meso.