natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They represent our best estimate for the respective categories of staff within the three institutions. 
Predstavljajo najboljšo oceno Sodišča za zadevne kategorije uslužbencev znotraj treh institucij.
The overview of the main results of the survey is presented in Table 2. 48 
Pregled glavnih rezultatov ankete je predstavljen v tabeli 2. 48
Table 2 – Overview of the main results of the survey 49 1. 
Tabela 2 – Pregled glavnih rezultatov ankete 49 1.
How would you assess your knowledge of the ethical framework applicable within your institution? 
Kako ocenjujete svoje znanje o etičnem okviru, ki se uporablja znotraj vaše institucije?
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Avoidance of conflict of interest 29.9 % 13.4 % 42.0 % 37.0 % 7.7 % 31.2 % 16.8 % 10.2 % 11.5 % 38.9 % 36.1 % 13.5 % 2.4. 
Dobro poznam te zahteve. Imam poglobljeno znanje o teh zahtevah.
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Rules on outside activities I have in-depth knowledge of the requirements 36.7 % 21.7 % 15.3 % 3.4 % 17.9 % 13.9 % 40.3 % 37.7 % 8.1 % 2.5. 
Ali poznate zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za : pravila o zunanjih dejavnostih? 36,7 % 21,7 % 15,3 % 3,4 % 17,9 % 7,3 % 13,9 % 40,3 % 37,7 % 8,1 % 2.5.
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Obligation of confidentiality 52.3 % 24.4 % 18.6 % 12.4 % 18.9 % 31.6 % 20.1 % 20.1 % 47.2 % 27.2 % 5.5 % 2.6. 
Ali poznate zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za : obveznost glede zaupnosti? Imam poglobljeno znanje o teh zahtevah. 52,3 % 18,6 % 20,1 % 47,2 % 27,2 % 5,5 % 2.6.
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Rules on gifts, payments, honours and hospitality I have in-depth knowledge of the requirements 34.1 % 54.1 % 19.6 % 53.3 % 16.9 % 5.7 % 15.3 % 15.2 % 9.2 % 13.9 % 43.1 % 34.2 % 8.8 % 2.7. 
Ali poznate zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za : pravila glede daril, plačil, časti in gostoljubnosti? Imam poglobljeno znanje o teh zahtevah. Dobro poznam te zahteve.
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Rules in case of intention to run for public office and taking up public office 15.6 % 5.9 % 5.4 % 18.8 % 45.8 % 30.0 % Managers Administrators APAs Other Commission Council Parliament TOTAL 
Imam poglobljeno znanje o teh zahtevah. 15,6 % 40,0 % 5,9 % 16,9 % 2,7 % 4,6 % 5,0 % 7,9 % 5,4 % 18,8 % 45,8 % 30,0 % Vodstveni delavci Upravni uslužbenci Akreditirani parlamentarni pomočniki Drugi Komisija Svet Parlament SKUPAJ
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Rules and guidance on the use of information and communications technology 18.7 % 53.4 % 24.2 % 3.7 % 56.0 % 7.3 % 0.2 % 52.0 % 27.8 % 3.6 % 45.0 % 23.9 % 6.7 % 3. 
Teh zahtev ne poznam. 2.11. Ali poznate zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za : pravila in smernice za uporabo informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije?
How would you assess your awareness of the ways in which unethical conduct (a conduct which does not appear to be in compliance with the Institution's ethical framework) can be reported? 
Kako bi ocenili svoje poznavanje možnih načinov prijave neetičnega ravnanja (ravnanja, za katerega se zdi, da ni v skladu z etičnim okvirom institucije)?
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Rules with regards to psychological and sexual harassment 36.6 % 6.8 % 16.9 % 7.5 % 8.2 % 14.6 % 9.0 % 40.1 % 40.2 % 10.7 % 2.13. 
Ali poznate zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za : pravila v zvezi s psihičnim in spolnim nadlegovanjem? Imam poglobljeno znanje o teh zahtevah. 36,6 % 16,9 % 7,5 % 14,6 % 9,6 % 9,0 % 40,1 % 40,2 % 10,7 % 2.13.
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Rules on whistle-blowing I have in-depth knowledge of the requirements 16.6 % 5.5 % 6.8 % 3.2 % 5.5 % 6.2 % 3.3 % 5.1 % 26.8 % 37.3 % 30.8 % 2.14. 
Ali poznate zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za : pravila o prijavljanju nepravilnosti? 16,6 % 6,8 % 3,2 % 5,1 % 26,8 % 37,3 % 30,8 % 2.14.
Are you familiar with the requirements applicable to the following? : Contacts with interest representatives (lobbying) I have in-depth knowledge of the requirements 24.3 % 9.5 % 31.7 % 13.6 % 2.3 % 8.0 % 5.3 % 19.3 % 5.0 % 7.1 % 25.0 % 39.5 % 28.3 % I have in-depth knowledge of the ways in which unethical conduct can be reported 2.7 % 1.5 % 19.4 % 52.2 % 27.0 % 1.7 % 29.3 % 55.4 % 13.5 % Managers Administrators APAs Other Commission Council Parliament TOTAL 
Dobro poznam te zahteve. Te zahteve nekoliko poznam in vem, kako dobiti več informacij. 24,3 % 45,0 % 23,9 % 9,5 % 31,7 % 40,1 % 13,6 % 39,0 % 40,7 % 2,3 % 14,8 % 40,6 % 8,0 % 26,6 % 37,5 % 5,3 % 19,3 % 43,0 % 5,0 % 22,1 % 44,9 % 7,1 % 25,0 % 39,5 % 28,3 % Imam poglobljeno znanje o možnih načinih prijave neetičnega ravnanja.
Have you attended any ethics training (e.g. courses, seminars, sessions) held by your institution or your service? 
Ali ste se udeležili kakšnega usposabljanja o etiki (npr. tečajev, seminarjev, sej), ki jih je organizirala vaša institucija ali služba?
Why have you not attended any training in ethics? 
Vodstvo ni odobrilo moje prijave za udeležbo na usposabljanju o etiki.
Does your institution or service provide you with guidance on ethical behaviour on the basis of real-world examples and by discussing how specific situations have been handled in the past and/or are expected to be handled in the future? 
Ali vam vaša institucija ali služba zagotavlja smernice o etičnem vedenju na podlagi resničnih primerov in z razpravami o tem, kako so se specifične situacije obravnavale v preteklosti in/ali kako naj bi se obravnavale v prihodnosti?
Did the training provide you with an adequate understanding of the ethics framework? 
Ali ste na usposabljanju pridobili ustrezno razumevanje etičnega okvira?
42.7 % 5.1 % 27.4 % 13.7 % 38.4 % 6.8 % 54.8 % 1.7 % 3.4 % 2.4 % 28.8 % 19.2 % 0.2 % 2.8 % 46.7 % 7. 
0,0 % 1,7 % 3,4 % 3,2 % 2,8 % 1,8 % 1,2 % 2,4 % 28,8 % 19,2 % 0,2 % 2,8 % 46,7 % 7.
Are you required to declare (once or on a regular basis) that you are aware of the ethical rules to which you are subject? 
Ali morate prijaviti (enkrat ali redno), da ste obveščeni o etičnih pravil, ki veljajo za vas? Da.
Yes 40.4 % 44.8 % 28.0 % 41.6 % 25.4 % 37.3 % 18.4 % 26.7 % 22.1 % 47.7 % 16.8 % 50.0 % 24.1 % 44.9 % 30.9 % 8. 
Ne. 40,4 % 44,8 % 28,0 % 41,6 % 25,4 % 18,4 % 26,7 % 22,1 % 16,8 % 24,1 % 44,9 % 30,9 % 8.
Are you required to confirm (explicitly or tacitly) on a regular basis whether you have complied with the ethical rules in force? 
Ali morate (eksplicitno ali samodejno) redno potrditi, da izpolnjujete veljavna etična pravila? Da.
5.1 % 9.4 % 13.7 % 54.5 % 22.4 % Yes No 58.6 % 41.4 % 32.7 % 67.3 % 30.5 % 69.5 % 23.7 % 76.3 % 31.6 % 68.4 % 31.2 % 68.8 % 23.9 % 76.1 % 29.8 % 70.2 % 10. 
Ne. 58,6 % 41,4 % 32,7 % 67,3 % 30,5 % 69,5 % 23,7 % 76,3 % 31,6 % 68,4 % 31,2 % 68,8 % 23,9 % 76,1 % 29,8 % 70,2 % 10.
Are you aware of the consequences of and sanctions against unethical behaviour? 
Ali ste seznanjeni s posledicami neetičnega vedenja in sankcijami zanj?
What is your perception on the following statement: I recognise unethical conduct when I see it 36.6 % 39.0 % 27.1 % 25.5 % 30.2 % 64.1 % 1.7 % 0.2 % 3.8 % Managers Administrators APAs Other Commission Council Parliament TOTAL 
Ne poznam nobenih kazni za neetično vedenje. 11.1. Kako dojemate naslednjo trditev: Neetično ravnanje prepoznam, ko ga vidim.
Are the requirements of the ethical framework sufficiently communicated (e.g. during meetings, training courses, events, on the intranet) to staff? 
Ali so uslužbenci dovolj seznanjeni z zahtevami etičnega okvira (npr. na sestankih, usposabljanjih, prireditvah, na intranetu)? Da.
In your opinion, does the ethical framework sufficiently address all potential issues? 
Ali etični okvir po vašem mnenju dovolj obravnava vse potencialne zadeve?
Yes, I believe so 65.0 % 38.7 % 23.7 % 28.8 % 25.1 % 36.6 % 19.2 % 32.6 % 16.8 % 22.7 % 33.2 % 18.8 % 48.0 % 14. 
65,0 % 13,8 % 21,2 % 38,7 % 20,7 % 23,7 % 28,8 % 47,5 % 25,1 % 16,3 % 58,6 % 36,6 % 19,2 % 32,6 % 16,8 % 22,7 % 18,2 % 33,2 % 18,8 % 48,0 % 14.
What is your perception of the sanctions your organisation adopted in the past against unethical conduct? 
Kako dojemate sankcije, ki jih je vaša organizacija v preteklosti sprejela za neetično ravnanje?
Acronyms and abbreviations APA(s): Accredited Parliamentary Assistant(s), AMP: Annual Management Plan, CEOS: Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, Council: Council of the European Union and the European Council, CoI: Conflict of Interest, DG: Directorate-General of the European Commission, AGRI: Agricultural and Rural Development, COMP: Competition, ENER: Energy, HR: Human Resources and Security, RTD: Research and Innovation and SG: Secretariat-General, EU: European Union, Commission: European Commission, Parliament: European Parliament, IR: Internal Rules, MEP(s): Member(s) of the European Parliament, OECD: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, RoP: Rules of Procedures, TEU: Treaty of the European Union, TFEU: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 
2,7 % 33,2 % 0,0 % 5,1 % 0,5 % 10,7 % 0,2 % 0,1 % 2,0 % 13,2 % 25,6 % 59,2 % 0,6 % 13,7 % 21,1 % 64,6 % Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče Vodstveni delavci Upravni uslužbenci Akreditirani parlamentarni pomočniki Drugi Komisija Svet Parlament SKUPAJ Kratice in okrajšave EU: Evropska unija GD: Generalni direktorat Evropske komisije, AGRI: kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, COMP: konkurenca, ENER: energetika, HR: človeški viri in varnost, RTD: raziskave in inovacije ter SG: generalni sekretariat Komisija: Evropska komisija OECD: Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj Parlament: Evropski parlament PDEU: Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije PEU: Pogodba o Evropski uniji Svet: Svet Evropske unije in Evropski svet 54
Workplace harassment is more and more a sensitive area of effective human resources’ management. 
Nadlegovanje na delovnem mestu postaja vse bolj občutljivo področje uspešnega upravljanja človeških virov.
It is also known as “mobbying”, and includes different types of discrimination and acts of violation that are not confined to one specific group of staff. These can be categorised into emotional and physical abuse. 
Imenuje se tudi „mobing” in vključuje različne vrste diskriminacije in kršitev, ki niso omejene na eno samo specifično skupino uslužbencev in se lahko razdelijo na čustveno ali fizično zlorabo.
Ethical framework: For the purposes of this audit we refer, firstly, to ethical legal requirements, and secondly, to procedures, enforcement tools, guidance and communication that help to ensure that legal requirements are being adhered to Gifts and entertainment: They are sums of money or any other physical objects offered without any payment in return or the possibility of participating free of charge in events that are accessible only in return of payment. 
Člani ali poslanci institucij EU: so osebe, ki so bile imenovane ali izvoljene v organ odločanja institucije. Darila in pogostitev: so denarni zneski ali kakršni koli drugi fizični predmeti, ponujeni brez kakršnega koli plačila zanje, ali možnosti brezplačne udeležbe na prireditvah, ki so dostopne le s plačilom.
These are also offers of food, drink, meals and accommodation. 
Mednje spadajo tudi ponujena hrana, pijača, obroki in nastanitev.
Hospitality: This includes providing food, drink, meals and accommodation. 
Gostoljubnost: zajema zagotavljanje hrane, pijače, obrokov in nastanitve.
It can also involve entertainment and leisure activities. 
Lahko vključuje tudi razvedrilne in prostočasne dejavnosti.
Mediation: In the context of the anti-harassment rules, this is a process according to which the victims decide to follow informal procedures to resolve the case. 
Mediacija: v kontekstu pravil za boj proti nadlegovanju je to postopek, v skladu s katerim se žrtve odločijo za neformalni postopek za rešitev zadeve.
Mediators are the persons who attempt to make people involved in a conflict come to an agreement (see also counselling). 
Mediatorji so osebe, ki si prizadevajo za to, da bi osebe, ki so v sporu, dosegle sporazum (glej tudi svetovanje).
These are of occupational character and/or go beyond what can be reasonably considered as leisure activities. Post-EU employment and mandate: Former staff or Members of the EU institutions are subject to certain obligations, some of which are applicable to active officials or to the duration of their mandate. 
Obdobje po prenehanju zaposlitve in mandata v institucijah EU: za nekdanje uslužbence ali člane ali poslance institucij EU veljajo obveznosti, od katerih se nekatere uporabljajo za aktivno zaposlene uradnike ali v obdobju trajanja njihovega mandata.
These obligations are provided for in the Staff Regulations or in the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) as well as in the codes of conduct for Members of the EU institutions, and include notably: the prohibition of unauthorised disclosure of information, the obligation to notify any occupational activities within two years after leaving the service, duty to behave with integrity and discretion as regards the acceptance of certain appointments and benefits, provisions related to inventions and the reception of social benefits and allowances. 56 
Te obveznosti so navedene v kadrovskih predpisih ali Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) ter v kodeksu ravnanja za člane ali poslance institucij EU in zajemajo zlasti: prepoved nepooblaščenega razkritja informacij, obveznost seznanjanja s kakršnimi koli poklicnimi dejavnostmi v dveh letih po prenehanju zaposlitve v instituciji EU, dolžnost vedenja z integriteto in diskretnega vedenja v zvezi s sprejemanjem nekaterih imenovanj ali ugodnosti, določbe v zvezi z izumi ter sprejemanjem socialnih prejemkov in dodatkov.
Register of gifts: It is a register, which includes all relevant information on gifts and entertainment accepted by staff and Members of the EU institutions. 
Register daril: je register, ki zajema vse relevantne informacije o darilih in pogostitvah, ki so jih prejeli uslužbenci in člani ali poslanci institucij EU.
For staff, it is an internal register managed by the Administration, and only includes gifts for which a permission is required. 
Register za uslužbence je interni register, ki ga upravlja uprava in zajema le darila, za katera je potrebno dovoljenje.
For the Members, the register is publicly available; it is managed by the President and includes all gifts accepted. 
Register za člane in poslance je javno dostopen. Upravlja ga predsednik in zajema vsa sprejeta darila.
Self-declaration: This is a tool, which is in place in the EU institutions, allowing staff and Members to fulfil their obligations on ethics. 
Upravne poizvedbe: so vsi ukrepi, ki jih sprejmejo pooblaščeni uradniki za ugotavljanje dejanskega stanja in po potrebi tega, ali uradniki institucij EU dejansko niso izpolnjevali svojih obveznosti.
Staff of the EU institutions: These are all members of the staff employed directly by the EU under different employment schemes: officials, temporary agents, contract agents, local agents, special advisers and accredited parliamentary assistants. 
Uslužbenci institucij EU: so vsi uslužbenci, ki jih je zaposlila neposredno EU na podlagi različnih zaposlitvenih shem in so lahko uradniki, začasni uslužbenci, pogodbeni uslužbenci, lokalni uslužbenci, posebni svetovalci in akreditirani parlamentarni pomočniki.
Other persons working as seconded national experts and trainees are assimilated to staff of the EU institutions. 
Druge osebe, ki delajo kot napoteni nacionalni strokovnjaki in praktikanti, so pridružene uslužbencem institucij EU.
REPLIES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ADOPTED BY THE BUREAU TO THE OBSERVATIONS BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, ON THE SPECIAL REPORT “THE ETHICAL FRAMEWORKS OF THE AUDITED EU INSTITUTIONS: SCOPE FOR IMPROVEMENT” Reply to Observation 38: Parliament believes that its Rules of Procedures (including the codes of conduct and of appropriate behaviour), as well as the anti-harassment roadmap, constitute strategic objectives and priorities for Members’ ethics. 
57 ODGOVORI EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA, KI JIH JE SPREJELO PREDSEDSTVO NA UGOTOVITVE EVROPSKEGA RAČUNSKEGA SODIŠČA, V ZVEZI S POSEBNIM POROČILOM „ETIČNI OKVIRI REVIDIRANIH INSTITUCIJ EU: MOŽNOSTI ZA IZBOLJŠAVE“ Odgovor na pripombo 38: Parlament meni, da njegov poslovnik (vključno s kodeksom ravnanja in ustreznim ravnanjem) ter načrt boja proti nadlegovanju izražata strateške cilje in prednostne naloge za etiko poslancev.
The code of conduct and staff anti-harassment policy express its strategic objectives and priorities for staff. 
Kodeks ravnanja in kadrovska politika proti nadlegovanju odražata strateška cilja in prednostni nalogi za uslužbence.
As the evaluation of 2017 demonstrates, performance is measurable. 
Kot dokazuje ocenjevanje iz leta 2017, je uspešnost merljiva.
Reply to Observation 43: All declarations on the absence of CoI at recruitment are sent to the ethics sector of the Career Development and Ethics Unit (CDEU) for verification. 
Odgovor na pripombo 43: Vse izjave o odsotnosti preiskovalne komisije pri zaposlitvenem postopku se pošljejo v preverjanje oddelku za etiko enote za karierni razvoj in etiko.
Cross-checks are performed in practice, wherever possible, between relevant units of the European Parliament. 
Navzkrižna preverjanja se izvajajo v praksi, kadar koli je to mogoče, med ustreznimi oddelki Evropskega parlamenta.
Consistency is ensured by the review of all files by the Head of Unit. 
Skladnost se zagotovi s pregledovanjem vseh dokumentov, ki ga opravi vodja enote.
Moreover, when changes to the spouse’s employment are registered at the Individual Entitlements Unit, the CDEU colleagues follow this and send the form for the declaration of spouse’s gainful employment to the colleague concerned. 
Poleg tega, kadar se spremembe zaposlitve zakonca registrirajo v enoti za individualne pravice, to obravnavajo uslužbenci CDEU in zadevnemu uslužbencu ali uslužbenki pošljejo obrazec za prijavo plačane zaposlitve zakonca.
Existing documentation will be completed with the checks to be performed. 
Rezultati preverjanj bodo vključeni v obstoječo dokumentacijo.
Reply to Observation 48: MEPs may seek advice in confidence from the Advisory Committee on the Conduct of Members. 
Odgovor na pripombo 48: Poslancem lahko z nasveti pomaga posvetovalni odbor o ravnanju poslancev.
In case of an alleged breach of these disclosure obligations, a procedure is set out in Art. 8 of the Code of Conduct. 
V primeru domnevne kršitve obveznosti razkritja je postopek določen v členu 8 kodeksa ravnanja.
Parliament submits that setting out a further-reaching “written standard procedure” on how to conduct the checks that are foreseen is problematic because of the infinite possible variety of incoming information. 
Parlament trdi, da je določitev daljnosežnejšega „pisnega standardnega postopka“ o tem, kako izvesti predvidene preglede, problematična zaradi neskončne možne raznolikosti prejetih informacij.
Therefore, by necessity, each incoming piece of information has to be assessed on its own merits. 
Zato je treba vsako novo informacijo oceniti posebej.
A full requirement of ex officio checks on accuracy or completeness could require significant additional human resources, up to approximately 60 AD posts. 
Popolno izvajanje zahteve po uradnem preverjanju točnosti ali popolnosti bi lahko zahtevalo znatne človeške vire, do približno 60 dodatnih delovnih mest AD.
Also, it should be noted that Parliament has no powers of investigation over MEPs, who are accountable to the voters, and must respect the free mandate. 
Prav tako bi bilo treba opozoriti, da Parlament nima pooblastil za preiskavo o poslancih, ki so odgovorni volivcem, in mora spoštovati svobodni mandat.
Reply to Observation 50: Guidance based on a consistent and well-established practice is available for MEPs. 
Odgovor na pripombo 50: Poslancem so na voljo smernice, ki temeljijo na dosledni in uveljavljeni praksi.
Reply to Observation 53: For staff, Parliament has a code of conduct in place (Guide to the obligations of officials and other servants of the European Parliament, Bureau Decision of 7 July 2008). 
Odgovor na pripombo 53: Za osebje ima Parlament kodeks ravnanja (priročnik o obveznostih uradnikov in drugih uslužbencev Evropskega parlamenta, sklep predsedstva z dne 7. julija 2008).
To improve accessibility and understanding, Parliament has prepared and is currently in the process of launching an additional EN PE 639.414/BUR/ANN.2/rev 
Za izboljšanje dostopnosti in razumevanja je Parlament pripravil in trenutno pripravlja dodatne smernice za uslužbence, ki vključujejo obsežna in podrobna pojasnila, primere in postopkovna navodila v zvezi s kodeksom ravnanja, vključno z vsemi vprašanji, ki jih je Računsko sodišče izpostavilo v zvezi z darili.
Reply to Observation 56: The Parliament would like to point out that APAs are employed directly by the European Parliament while they work under the direction of the Member they assist who acts as hierarchical superior (Article 5a of the CEOS and Article 1 of the implementing measures of Title VII of the CEOS). 
Parlament želi poudariti, da so akreditirani parlamentarni pomočniki zaposleni neposredno v Evropskem parlamentu, delajo pa pod vodstvom poslanca, pri katerem so pomočniki in ki deluje kot nadrejeni (člen 5a Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropske unije in člen 1 izvedbenih ukrepov iz naslova VII teh pogojev).
Given that they are “chosen by one or more Members”, it is not possible for them to be transferred to another post in the EP by decision of the administration alone. 
Glede na to, da jih izbere eden ali več poslancev, ne morejo biti premeščeni na drugo delovno mesto v EP izključno z odločbo uprave.
Parliament may not unilaterally change this, as it is a legislative requirement. 
Parlament tega ne more enostransko spremeniti, saj je to zakonodajna zahteva.
However, other, tailor-made forms of assistance are available p for APAs, in accordance with Article 24 of the Staff Regulations, as applicable by analogy to APAs. 
Vendar se za akreditirane parlamentarne pomočnike v skladu s členom 24 kadrovskih predpisov po analogiji uporabljajo prilagojene oblike pomoči.
Reply to Observation 61: The Parliament has no jurisdiction to define further reaching restrictions over former MEPs other than regarding their access to premises, use of facilities and financial entitlements. 
Odgovor na pripombo 61: Parlament ni pristojen za določanje daljnosežnih omejitev glede nekdanjih poslancev, razen glede njihovega dostopa do prostorov, uporabe zmogljivosti in finančnih pravic.
It should also be taken into account that it has been a major step in the development of parliamentary democracy to allow and encourage persons who are not able to sustain themselves by existing wealth to run for public office. 
Treba bi tudi bilo upoštevati, da je to pomemben korak v razvoju parlamentarne demokracije, da bi omogočali osebam, ki se ne morejo same preživljati z obstoječim premoženjem, da kandidirajo za javno funkcijo, in jih k temu spodbujali.
Further restrictions on immediate post-mandate employment therefore either means accepting a disincentive to run for office in the first place, since there is no “employment guarantee” for Members beyond one legislative term, or compensatory mechanisms might have to be found in the transitional allowances schemes. 
Nadaljnje omejitve glede takojšnje zaposlitve po izteku mandata zato pomenijo, da je treba v prvi vrsti predvideti odvračilnost pri kandidaturi, saj po izteku zakonodajnega obdobja za poslance ni „jamstva za zaposlitev“ , ali pa bi lahko v sheme za začasna nadomestila vključili kompenzacijske mehanizme.
Reply to Observation 67: The Parliament prioritises resolving any conflict of interest, and requires to publish information about it only where the MEP does not resolve it. 
Odgovor na pripombo 67: Parlament daje prednost reševanju vsakega navzkrižja interesov in zahteva, da se o tem objavijo podatki le, če ga poslanec ne razreši.