natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The budget for 2015 was €51.1 billion. • Efforts to address problems with public procurement in EU cohesion expenditure should be intensified (10/2015) - examined whether the Commission and Member States are taking appropriate and effective action to address the problem of public procurement errors in the cohesion area. 
Proračun za leto 2015 je znašal 51,1 milijarde EUR. • Prizadevanja za reševanje problemov pri javnem naročanju na področju odhodkov EU za kohezijo bi bilo treba povečati (10/2015) – V poročilu je bilo preučeno, ali so Komisija in države članice sprejele primerne in uspešne ukrepe za reševanje problema napak pri javnem naročanju na področju kohezijske politike.
The audit found that widespread problems persist in the way public authorities across the EU contract out work. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da še vedno obstajajo splošno razširjeni problemi v zvezi z načinom, kako javni organi v EU oddajajo javna naročila.
Even though the Commission and the Member States have started to address the problem, there is still a long way to go. 
Čeprav so Komisija in države članice problem začele reševati, jih čaka še veliko dela.
Serious errors resulted in a lack of fair competition and contracts being awarded to those who were not the best bidders. 
Zaradi resnih napak je prihajalo do pomanjkanja poštene konkurence in do oddaje naročil tistim ponudnikom, ki niso bili najboljši.
Systematic analysis is very limited and there is a lack of sufficiently detailed, robust and coherent data on the nature and extent of the errors. 
Opravljenih je bilo zelo malo sistematičnih analiz in primanjkuje dovolj podrob-nih, zanesljivih in usklajenih podatkov o naravi in obsegu napak.
If the situation has not improved by the end of 2016, the audit recommended that 2014-2020 payments to the Member States concerned should be suspended. 
Pri reviziji je bila zato priporočena začasna ustavitev nakazovanja plačil za obdobje 2014–2020 nekaterim državam članicam, če se položaj v njih ne bo izboljšal do konca leta 2016.
Between 2007 and 2013, €349 billion was earmarked for spending in the area of regional policy through the ERDF, the CF and the ESF. 
Od leta 2007 do leta 2013 je bilo za porabo na področju regionalne politike rezerviranih 349 milijard EUR iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj, Kohezijskega sklada in Evropskega socialnega sklada.
A significant part of this money is spent through public procurement. 
Velik del tega denarja se porabi na podlagi javnega naročanja.
Errors were detected in around 40 % of projects in which public procurement was audited in the ECA’s annual reports over the years 2009-2013. 
Pri približno 40 % projektov, pri katerih je Sodišče za pripravo letnih poročil za leta od 2009 do 2013 revidiralo javno naročanje, so bile odkrite napake.
Our activities 19 • EU funding of Urban Waste Water Treatment plants in the Danube river basin: further efforts needed in helping Member States to achieve EU waste water policy objectives (2/2015) - assessed the effectiveness of the ERDF and the CF in helping Member States in the Danube river basin to achieve EU waste water policy objectives. 
Naše dejavnosti 19 • Poraba sredstev EU za komunalne čistilne naprave v Podonavju: potrebna so dodatna prizadevanja za pomoč državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU na področju odpadne vode (2/2015) – V poročilu je bila ocenjena uspešnost pomoči iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijskega sklada za države članice v Podonavju pri doseganju ciljev politike EU na področju odpadne vode.
The audit found that while EU spending played a key role in helping the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia achieve progress, all countries incurred delays in complying with the rules and in taking up the EU money available. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da so imela sredstva EU ključno vlogo pri doseganju napredka na Češkem, Madžarskem, v Romuniji in na Slovaškem, vendar so v vseh teh državah nastale zamude pri izpolnjevanju pravil in črpanju razpoložljivih sredstev EU.
A third of the plants were oversized and potentially unsustainable. 
Tretjina čistilnih naprav je bila prevelika in potencialno ni bila vzdržna.
The countries took up the available EU funds slowly, thus risking losing EU funding or creating a need for additional money from their national coffers. 
Države so razpoložljiva sredstva EU črpale počasi in tako tvegale, da bodo izgubile financiranje EU ali ustvarile potrebo po dodatnih sredstvih iz nacionalnih blagajn.
The Commission should enhance reporting requirements and Member States should put in place legal provisions to ensure prompt connection to the public sewage network. 
Komisija bi morala okrepiti zahteve glede poročanja, države članice pa bi morale sprejeti predpise za zagotovitev hitre priključitve gospodinjstev na javna kanalizacijska omrežja.
The Commission and Member States should set criteria for all types of use of sludge and ensure robust monitoring of pollutants. 
Komisija in države članice bi morale določiti merila za vse vrste uporabe blata in zagotoviti zanesljivo spremljanja onesnaževal.
The EU contributed €7.9 billion for waste water treatment projects in the four audited Member States over the 2000-2006 and 2007-2013 programme periods. • Water quality in the Danube river basin: progress in implementing the water framework directive but still some way to go (23/2015) - assessed whether the implementation of the water framework directive by the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia led to an improvement in the surface water quality of the Danube river basin. 
EU je v programskih obdobjih 2000–2006 in 2007–2013 prispevala 7,9 milijarde EUR za projekte čiščenja odpadne vode v štirih revidiranih državah članicah. • Kakovost vode v Podonavju: izvajanje okvirne direktive o vodah napreduje, vendar ostaja še veliko dela (23/2015) – V poročilu je bilo ocenjeno, ali je izvajanje okvirne direktive o vodah na Češkem, Madžarskem, v Romuniji in na Slovaškem privedlo do izboljšanja kakovosti površinske vode v Podonavju.
The audit found there had been little improvement since 2004. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je stanje od leta 2004 le malo izboljšalo.
The audit pointed to an absence of targeted measures for water bodies of unsatisfactory quality. 
Revizija je opozorila na pomanjkanje ciljno usmerjenih ukrepov za vodna telesa nezadovoljive kakovosti.
There were also shortcomings in monitoring systems resulting in a lack of data both on the type and sources of pollution which caused water bodies to fail. 
Obstajale so tudi pomanjkljivosti v sistemih spremljanja, ki so povzročile pomanjkanje podatkov o vrsti in virih onesnaževanja, zaradi katerih stanje vodnih teles ni bilo dobro.
In addition, Member States exempted a significant number of water bodies from important deadlines without sufficient justification. 
Poleg tega države članice za veliko število vodnih teles niso upoštevale pomembnih rokov, ne da bi to zadostno utemeljile.
The recommendations included improving pollution monitoring and diagnosis systems, stronger criteria for inspections and looking at charges or taxation to deter emissions. 
Priporočila so vključevala izboljšanje sistemov za spremljanje in diagnozo onesnaženosti ter preučitev pristojbin ali obdavčitev za odvračanje od emisij.
Between 2007 and 2013, the ERDF and the CF provided €6.35 billion to Member States in the Danube basin for waste water treatment. 
Med letoma 2007 in 2013 je bilo državam članicam v Podonavju iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj/Kohezijskega sklada zagotovljenih 6,35 milijarde EUR za čiščenje odpadne vode.
Over the same period, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) provided €6.39 billion to compensate farmers taking agri-environmental measures. 
V istem obdobju je Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja zagotovil 6,39 milijarde EUR za nadomestila kmetom za izvajanje kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
Our activities 20 • EU Youth Guarantee: first steps taken but implementation risks ahead (3/2015) - assessed whether the Commission provided appropriate support to Member States in setting up the Youth Guarantee scheme and reviewed possible implementation risks. 
Naše dejavnosti 20 • Jamstvo EU za mlade: narejeni so bili prvi koraki, vendar se nakazujejo tveganja pri izvajanju (3/2015) – V poročilu je bilo ocenjeno, ali je Komisija zagotovila ustrezno podporo državam članicam pri vzpostavljanju programov jamstva za mlade, pregledana pa so bila tudi mogoča tveganja pri izvajanju.
The audit identified three risks to the successful implementation of the Youth Guarantee initiative: adequacy of total funding, the definition of a ‘good-quality offer’ and the way the Commission monitors and reports on results. 
Pri reviziji so bila ugotovljena tri tveganja za uspešno izvajanje pobude za jamstvo za mlade: zadostnost skupnega financiranja, opredelitev kakovostne ponudbe in način, kako Komisija spremlja rezultate programa in poroča o njih.
The Commission did provide timely and appropriate support to the Member States in setting up their Youth Guarantee schemes. 
Komisija je zagotovila pravočasno in ustrezno podporo državam članicam pri vzpostavljanju njihovih programov jamstva za mlade.
But it did not carry out an impact assessment specifying expected costs and benefits, despite this being a standard procedure. 
Ni pa izvedla ocene učinka, v kateri bi bili navedeni pričakovani stroški in koristi, čeprav je to standardni postopek.
Although the Commission had asked Member States to provide cost estimates when submitting their Youth Guarantee implementation plans, some responses lacked relevant information, while none provided estimated costs for the structural reforms required. 
Komisija je sicer pozvala države članice, naj pri predložitvi izvedbenih načrtov za jamstvo za mlade zagotovijo oceno stroškov, vendar nekatere države niso poslale ustreznih informacij, nobena od njih pa ni posredovala ocenjenih stroškov za potrebne strukturne reforme.
The Youth Guarantee scheme was established in June 2013 in response to the worsening situation for young unemployed people, which was exacerbated by the economic and financial crisis. 
Program jamstva za mlade je bil vzpostavljen junija 2013 v odziv na slabšanje razmer za mlade brezposelne, ki so se zaostrile zaradi gospodarske in finančne krize.
From 2014 to 2020, the scheme will be partly financed to a total of €12.7 billion from the EU budget through the ESF and a dedicated Youth Employment initiative. • Commission’s support of youth action teams: redirection of ESF funding achieved, but insufficient focus on results (17/2015) - assessed whether the redirection of ESF funding benefited from proposals developed in 2012 by the youth action teams on how to achieve faster and more effective results for young unemployed people through ESF spending. 
V obdobju od leta 2014 do leta 2020 bo program delno financiran iz proračuna EU v skupni višini 12,7 milijarde EUR, in sicer v okviru Evropskega socialnega sklada in posebne pobude za jamstvo za mlade. • Podpora Komisije za skupine za ukrepanje na področju zaposlovanja mladih: preusmerjanje sredstev ESS doseženo, vendar ni dovolj osredotočenosti na rezultate (17/2015) – V poročilu je bilo ocenjeno, ali so bili predlogi, kako bi s sredstvi Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS) hitreje in uspešneje dosegli rezultate pri zaposlovanju mladih brezposelnih, ki so jih leta 2012 pripravile skupine za ukrepanje na področju zaposlovanja mladih, koristni za preusmeritev financiranja iz ESS.
The audit found that the youth action teams set up by the Commission did succeed in redirecting money towards support for young people, but they made only limited proposals. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile skupine za ukrepanje na področju zaposlovanja mladih, ki jih je ustanovila Komisija, uspešne pri preusmerjanju sredstev v podporo mladim, vendar je bilo predlogov malo.
The Commission provided advice to the Member States, but its support was limited by the level and quality of information available to it. 
Komisija je zagotavljala svetovanje za države članice, vendar je bila njena podpora omejena zaradi ravni in kakovosti razpoložljivih informacij.
While the initiative led to the reprogramming and reallocation of ESFs, the Commission’s assessment of operational programme amendments focused mainly on their impact on the budget. 
Pobuda je sicer privedla do reprogramiranja in prerazporeditve sredstev Evropskega socialnega sklada, toda Komisija je v svoji oceni sprememb operativnih programov namenjala pozornost predvsem njihovemu vplivu na proračun.
Expectations for such initiatives need to be better managed where there is a potential gap between what is promised and what can realistically be delivered by the Commission. 
Kadar obstaja možna vrzel med tem, kar je bilo obljubljeno, in tem, kar Komisija lahko dejansko uresniči, ja treba pričakovanja v zvezi s takimi pobudami bolje usmerjati.
The Commission set up youth action teams in 2012, as part of its youth opportunities initiative. 
Komisija je v okviru pobude Priložnosti za mlade leta 2012 ustanovila skupine za ukrepanje na področju zaposlovanja mladih.
The teams brought together national and Commission experts in the eight Member States with the highest levels of youth unemployment. 
V skupinah, ki so bile ustanovljene v osmih državah članicah z najvišjo stopnjo brezposelnosti mladih, so sodelovali strokovnjaki iz držav članic in Komisije.
The initiative concerned almost €10 billion of ESFs still available in the Member States concerned. 
Pobuda je bila povezana s skoraj 10 milijardami EUR sredstev Evropskega socialnega sklada, ki so bile še vedno na voljo v teh državah članicah.
Our activities 21 Natural resources €417 billion Sustainable growth: natural resources This budgetary heading covers the EU’s common agricultural and fisheries policies, rural development and environmental measures. 
Naše dejavnosti 21 Naravni viri 417 milijard EUR Trajnostna rast: naravni viri Ta proračunska postavka zajema skupno kmetijsko in ribiško politiko EU, razvoj podeželja in okoljske ukrepe.
Three quarters of the spending involves direct spending to farmers and support for agricultural markets. 
Tri četrtine sredstev se porabi kot neposredna poraba za kmete in podpora za kmetijske trge.
A further fifth goes for rural development. 
Petina sredstev pa se porabi za razvoj podeželja.
The planned expenditure for 2014-2020 represents almost 39 % of the total EU budget for the whole programming period, which is €417 billion. 
Načrtovani odhodki za obdobje 2014–2020 dosegajo skoraj 39 % celotnega proračuna EU za celotno programsko obdobje, kar je 417 milijard EUR.
The budget for 2015 was €56 billion. 
Proračun za leto 2015 je znašal 56 milijard EUR.
100 80 60 40 20 0 39 % • Technical assistance: what contribution has it made to agriculture and rural development? 
100 80 60 40 20 0 39 % • Tehnična pomoč: kakšen je njen prispevek na področju kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja?
(4/2015) - examined the use of technical assistance funds in agriculture and rural development during the 2007-2013 programming period. 
(4/2015) – V poročilu je bila preučena poraba sredstev za tehnično pomoč na področju kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja v programskem obdobju 2007–2013.
It focused on the regularity, effectiveness and efficiency of funding at the Commission and in the Member States. 
Revizija je bila osredotočena na pravilnost, uspešnost in učinkovitost financiranja v Komisiji in državah članicah.
The audit found that neither the European Commission nor the Member States were able to demonstrate how well the use of technical assistance in agriculture and rural development policy had contributed to budgetary efficiency and to the objectives of the common agricultural policy. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da Evropska komisija in države članice niso mogle dokazati, kako dobro je tehnična pomoč na področju kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja prispevala k proračunski učinkovitosti in ciljem skupne kmetijske politike.
Rural networks, which aim to increase cooperation, knowledge sharing and innovation in the agricultural sector, are a very suitable vehicle for technical assistance. 
Mreže za podeželje, katerih cilj je povečanje sodelovanja, izmenjave znanja in inovacij v kmetijskem sektorju, so še posebno primerne za zagotavljanje tehnične pomoči.
But in most cases resources intended for capacity building had been used to shore up general administrative budgets. 
Vendar pa so bila v večini primerov sredstva, namenjena vzpostavljanju zmogljivosti, uporabljena kot podpora za splošne administrativne proračune.
The Commission should clarify the scope and application of technical assistance from Member States in the area of rural development and monitor implementation closely. 
Komisija bi morala razjasniti obseg in uporabo tehnične pomoči držav članic na področju razvoja podeželja in skrbno spremljati njeno izvajanje.
For the 2007-2013 period, the Member States planned to use €1.5 billion of technical assistance funding from the EU budget, up to a ceiling of 4 % of the national rural development envelope. 
Za obdobje 2007–2013 so države članice iz proračuna EU nameravale porabiti 1,5 milijarde EUR sredstev za financiranje tehnične pomoči do zgornje meje v višini 4 % nacionalne ovojnice za razvoj podeželja.
For the 2014-2020 period, that figure has increased to around €1.9 billion. 
Za obdobje 2014–2020 se je ta znesek povečal na približno 1,9 milijarde EUR.
Our activities 22 • Are financial instruments a successful and promising tool in the rural development area? 
Naše dejavnosti 22 • Ali so finančni instrumenti uspešno in obetavno orodje na področju razvoja podeželja?
(5/2015) - focused on whether financial instruments (loan and guarantee funds) implemented under EU rural development policy had been well designed and managed in the 2007-2013 programming period. 
(5/2015) – Poročilo se osredotoča na vprašanje, ali so bili v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 finančni instrumenti (posojilni in jamstveni skladi), ki so se izvajali v okviru politike EU za razvoj podeželja, dobro zasnovani in upravljani.
No clear case was made for setting up financial instruments in the 2007-2013 programming period. 
V programskem obdobju 2007–2013 ni bilo jasnih argumentov za vzpostavitev finančnih instrumentov.
There was no reliable quantifiable information to justify the types of financial instrument established, determine demand for financial instruments in the field of agriculture and show that the amount of capital earmarked for the fund was appropriate. 
Prav tako ni bilo zanesljivih količinsko opredeljivih informacij, ki bi utemeljevale vrsto vzpostavljenih finančnih instrumentov, omogočale ugotavljanje povpraševanja po finančnih instrumentih na področju kmetijstva in dokazovale ustreznost zneska kapitala, namenjenega skladu.
Better incentives should be given for Member States to set up financial instruments for rural development and stimulate demand from farmers or other beneficiaries, and appropriate standards and targets for leverage and revolving effects should be set for 2014-2020. 
Državam članicam bi bilo treba zagotoviti boljše spodbude za vzpostavitev finančnih instrumentov za razvoj podeželja in spodbujanje povpraševanja kmetov ali drugih upravičencev. Za obdobje 2014–2020 bi bilo treba določiti ustrezne standarde ter cilje za učinek finančnega vzvoda in obnavljanja financiranja.
The EU and the Member States had invested around €700 million in rural development guarantee and loan funds by the end of 2013. 
EU in države članice so do konca leta 2013 inve-stirale približno 700 milijonov EUR v jamstvene in posojilne sklade za razvoj podeželja.
For the 2014-2020 period, the Commission wants Member States to commit themselves to at least a twofold increase in their use. 
Komisija želi, da se države članice zavežejo, da bodo v obdobju 2014–2020 uporabo finančnih instrumentov vsaj podvojile.
Performance audit in focus: The integrity and implementation of the EU ETS (6/2015) The European Union emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) is somewhat different from other policies and programmes we audit in that it does not receive significant funding from the EU budget. 
Poudarek na reviziji smotrnosti poslovanja: celovitost in izvajanje sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami (EU ETS) (6/2015) Sistem Evropske unije za trgovanje z emisijami (EU ETS) se nekoliko razlikuje od drugih politik in programov, ki jih revidiramo, saj ne prejema veliko sredstev iz proračuna EU.
On the other hand, it does have a very strong impact on the policy implementation across the EU and on the quality of life of citizens. 
Po drugi strani pa ima zelo močan vpliv na izvajanje politike v EU in na kakovost življenja državljanov.
Introduced in 2005, the EU ETS is often cited as the reference model for emerging climate change policy and emissions trading schemes elsewhere in the world. 
EU ETS, ki je bil uveden leta 2015, se pogosto navaja kot referenčni model za nastajajočo politiko na področju podnebnih sprememb in sisteme za trgovanje z emisijami drugod po svetu.
So one would expect there to be a good framework involving market regulation and oversight, legal certainty and systems for dealing with fundamental information. 
Zato bi bilo pričakovati, da bo obstajal dober okvir, ki bi vključeval ureditev in nadzor trga, pravno varnost in sisteme za obravnavanje temeljnih informacij.
Furthermore the ‘nuts and bolts’ of the implementation systems should be sufficiently tight. 
Poleg tega bi morali biti praktični elementi sistemov izvajanja dovolj premišljeni.
In late 2013, our auditors set out to examine the framework for protecting the integrity of the EU ETS and the systems for actually implementing the scheme in the Commission and the Member States up to phase II (end 2012). 
Konec leta 2013 so se naši revizorji lotili preučevanja okvira za zaščito celovitosti EU ETS ter sistemov za dejansko izvajanje programa v Komisiji in državah članicah do II. faze (konec leta 2012).
This was prompted by the risks in creating a functioning market to achieve the EU’s climate change policy, and the difficulties in controlling such an intangible activity (‘how to measure hot air?’). 
Vzrok za to so bila tveganja pri vzpostavitvi delujočega trga za dosego ciljev politike EU na področju podnebnih sprememb ter težave pri nadzorovanju takšne neotipljive dejavnosti („Kako izmeriti vroč zrak?“).
Our auditors assessed whether the EU ETS was managed adequately. 
Naši revizorji so ocenili, ali je bilo upravljanje EU ETS ustrezno.
Not only did they carry out desk reviews and interviews with the officials involved in managing the EU ETS at the European Commission in Brussels, but they also went to five Member States — Germany, France, Italy, Poland and the United Kingdom — to visit the relevant authorities. 
Opravili so preglede dokumentacije in razgovore z uradniki Evropske komisije v Bruslju, ki sodelujejo pri upravljanju EU ETS, ter obiskali pristojne organe v petih državah članicah: Nemčiji, Franciji, Italiji, na Poljskem in v Združenem kraljestvu.
In addition, they reviewed the documents for two others — Greece and Spain — and consulted experts in the field. 
Poleg tega so pregledali dokumentacijo še za dve državi (Grčijo in Španijo) ter se posvetovali s strokovnjaki na tem področju.
They also obtained evidence by testing the data from the documents at national authorities, which related to 150 installations selected from these seven countries, and an analysis of data from the EU’s transaction log. 
Dokaze so pridobili tudi s preizkušanjem podatkov iz dokumentacije nacionalnih organov, ki se je nanašala na 150 naprav, izbranih v teh sedmih državah, ter analizo podatkov iz evidence transakcij EU.
Our activities 23 They could not visit the actual installations as these do not get EU money to operate the scheme, so our institution does not have audit access rights. 
Samih naprav niso mogli obiskati, saj te Naše dejavnosti 23 za upravljanje sistema ne prejemajo sredstev EU, zato naša institucija nima pravice do njihovega revidiranja.
The evidence our auditors obtained pointed to a lack of oversight of the emissions market and also of cooperation between regulators. 
Dokazi, ki so jih pridobili naši revizorji, kažejo na pomanjkanje nadzora trga emisij, pa tudi sodelovanja med regulatorji.