natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Section III — Information on the suitability of buildings is not reliable and is not used for planning, which is too short term and particularly weak for owned properties 48 The suitability of delegation buildings depends not only on their initial selection, but also on the way the EEAS ensures they continue to meet needs and provide value for money. 
Oddelek III – Informacije o ustreznosti stavb niso zanesljive in se ne uporabljajo za načrtovanje, ki je preveč kratkoročno in še posebej ohlapno pri lastniških nepremičninah 48 Ustreznost stavb delegacij ni odvisna le od njihove prvotne izbire, ampak tudi od tega, kako ESZD zagotavlja, da stavbe še naprej zadostujejo potrebam in da so stroškovno učinkovite.
The audit therefore examined whether the EEAS monitors the suitability of buildings once they have been selected, and plans necessary changes and maintenance to ensure they continue to meet needs and provide value for money. 
Pri reviziji se je zato preučilo, ali ESZD spremlja ustreznost stavb, potem ko so bile izbrane, ter načrtuje potrebne spremembe in vzdrževanje za zagotavljanje, da še naprej zadostujejo potrebam in da so stroškovno učinkovite.
Central monitoring systems do not provide reliable basic information on the suitability of all delegation buildings Site visits assess whether buildings meet the needs of delegations, but do not identify all shortfalls 49 Headquarters assesses delegation buildings through the following mechanisms to ensure they continue to meet the needs of delegations. (a) The Delegation Support and Evaluation Service carries out evaluations of delegations on average every 4 years, which include an assessment of offices and residences. (b) On behalf of the EEAS, an external contractor carried out health and safety inspections of nearly all offices and residences of delegations between 2010 and 2015. (c) The regional security officer carries out security assessments of the delegation’s buildings at least once a year. 
Centralni sistemi za spremljanje ne zagotavljajo zanesljivih osnovnih informacij o ustreznosti vseh stavb delegacij Z obiski na kraju samem se oceni, ali stavbe zadostujejo potrebam delegacij, vendar se vse pomanjkljivosti ne odkrijejo 49 Za zagotovitev, da stavbe delegacij še naprej zadostujejo potrebam delegacij, jih sedež ocenjuje z naslednjimi mehanizmi: (a) služba za podporo delegacijam in ocenjevanje povprečno vsaka štiri leta opravi ocene delegacij, ki vključujejo oceno pisarn in rezidenc; (b) zunanji izvajalec je med letoma 2010 in 2015 v imenu ESZD opravil zdravstvene in varnostne inšpekcijske preglede skoraj vseh pisarn in rezidenc delegacij; (c) regionalni uradnik za varnost vsaj enkrat letno opravi ocene varnosti stavb delegacije.
Observations 37 50 These assessments of buildings recommend corrective action (for example, setting up security systems, carrying out works or moving premises) to remedy the shortfalls identified. 
Opažanja 37 50 V teh ocenah stavb se priporočajo popravljalni ukrepi (na primer vzpostavitev varnostnih sistemov, izvedba del ali selitev v druge prostore), s katerimi se odpravijo ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti.
However, these assessments do not identify all shortfalls. 
Vendar pa se v okviru teh ocen ne ugotovijo vse pomanjkljivosti.
For example, the November 2013 report of the regional security officer in Nepal did not address the fundamental issue of how to provide the same level of security for garages and prefabricated cabins as for the main building (see Box 2). 
V poročilu regionalnega uradnika za varnost v Nepalu iz novembra 2013 na primer ni bilo obravnavano temeljno vprašanje, kako za garaže in montažne hišice zagotoviti enako raven varnosti kot za glavno stavbo (glej okvir 2).
The monitoring of space per person in office buildings does not take account of all relevant factors 51 The EEAS building policy recommends that delegation offices should have a maximum size of 35 m2 per person (see paragraph 20). 
Pri spremljanju površine na osebo v pisarniških stavbah se ne upoštevajo vsi ustrezni dejavniki 51 Stavbna politika ESZD priporoča, naj bi imele pisarne delegacij največ 35 m2 površine na osebo (glej odstavek 20).
The building policy provides for certain areas to be excluded from the calculation. 
Skladno s stavbno politiko so nekateri prostori izvzeti iz izračuna.
However, headquarters cannot accurately identify all office buildings for which there is too much or too little space, because it does not separately identify the following surface areas when monitoring the space per person: (a) office space rented to another organisation; (b) an additional conference room when necessary to meet the needs of the presidency function under the Lisbon Treaty; (c) space used by temporary trainees and seconded national experts, when a delegation employs such staff regularly. 
Vendar sedež ne more natančno opredeliti vseh pisarniških stavb, ki imajo preveliko ali premajhno površino, ker pri spremljanju površine na osebo ne obravnava ločeno naslednjih površin: (a) pisarniških prostorov, oddanih v najem drugi organizaciji; (b) dodatne konferenčne sobe, ki je morda potrebna za potrebe funkcije predsedstva v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo; (c) prostorov, ki jih uporabljajo začasni pripravniki in napoteni nacionalni strokovnjaki, če jih delegacija redno zaposluje.
52 The monitoring system does not keep track of the buildings for which exemptions concerning the surface area ceilings have been granted. 
52 S sistemom za spremljanje se ne spremljajo stavbe, za katere je bila odobrena izjema glede zgornje meje za površino.
Observations 38 The EEAS does not monitor whether rents of office buildings and residences remain in line with market rates 53 Headquarters has the necessary information to calculate the cost per m2 for each office building and residence. 
Opažanja 38 ESZD ne spremlja, ali so najemnine za pisarniške stavbe in rezidence še vedno v skladu s tržnimi cenami 53 Sedež ima informacije, potrebne za izračun stroškov na m2 za vsako pisarniško stavbo in rezidenco.
However, it does not regularly compare these costs per m2 with market rates to identify significant differences. 
Vendar pa teh stroškov na m2 redno ne primerja s tržnimi cenami, da bi ugotovil, ali obstajajo bistvene razlike.
Such an exercise was carried out for staff accommodation in 2014: it found significant differences between some rental ceilings and market prices. 
Takšna primerjava je bila izvedena leta 2014 za stanovanja zaposlenih. Ugotovljene so bile bistvene razlike med nekaterimi zgornjimi mejami in tržnimi cenami za najemnine.
Similarly, headquarters does not monitor charges to co-located organisations to ensure they recover full costs. 
Prav tako sedež ne spremlja stroškov, ki se zaračunajo drugim organizacijam za kolokacijo, da bi se zagotovilo kritje celotnih dejanskih stroškov.
The EEAS does not reliably record the results of its monitoring in its information systems 54 Before the creation of the EEAS, the European Commission had developed an information system for managing delegation real estate: ImmoGest. 
ESZD v svojih informacijskih sistemih ne beleži zanesljivo rezultatov spremljanja 54 Evropska komisija je pred ustanovitvijo ESZD za upravljanje nepremičnin delegacij razvila informacijski sistem ImmoGest.
This buildings information system, in use since 2008, has the potential to provide information to feed into the planning process in line with best practice. 
Ta informacijski sistem za stavbe, ki se uporablja od leta 2008, bi lahko zagotavljal informacije, ki bi se v skladu z najboljšo prakso uporabile pri procesu načrtovanja.
However, more than half of the respondents to the audit survey considered that ImmoGest is not useful for managing buildings (see Figure 16). 
Vendar pa je več kot polovica anketirancev menila, da ImmoGest za upravljanje stavb ni uporaben (glej sliko 16).
Opinions on ImmoGest 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Disagree Agree Useful for managing buildings Easy to use Complete Reliable Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations. 
Mnenja o sistemu ImmoGest 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% se ne strinjam se strinjam uporaben za upravljanje stavb preprosta uporaba popoln zanesljiv Vir: Revizijska anketa za vodje administracije v delegacijah EU.
Respondents Figure 16 
Anketiranci Slika 16
Observations 39 55 Each delegation is responsible for entering information on its office buildings, residence and staff accommodation in ImmoGest. 
Opažanja 39 55 Vsaka delegacija je odgovorna za vnašanje informacij o svojih pisarniških stavbah, rezidencah in stanovanjih zaposlenih v ImmoGest.
However, around 35 % of office buildings and residences were not recorded in ImmoGest in 2014. 
Vendar pa leta 2014 približno 35 % pisarniških stavb in rezidenc ni bilo evidentiranih v sistemu ImmoGest.
More than half of the respondents to the audit survey considered that the system is not easy to use and more than 30 % of respondents considered that the data are not complete or reliable (see Figure 16). 
Več kot polovica anketirancev je menila, da sistem ni preprost za uporabo, in več kot 30 % jih je odgovorilo, da podatki niso popolni ali zanesljivi (glej sliko 16).
56 The following findings from the audit visits to delegations reinforced the results of the survey. (a) The ImmoGest system is not user friendly. 
56 Rezultate raziskave so okrepile naslednje ugotovitve revizijskih obiskov pri delegacijah: (a) sistem je ImmoGest ni uporabniku prijazen.
It has bugs which have not been fixed and in Nepal, for example, the system functions slowly and is sometimes inaccessible. (b) The information is not linked to business processes and the ImmoGest system does not, for example, provide practical reminders when rental payments are due or when lease end dates are approaching. (c) Headquarters does not make effective use of the information entered by delegations. 
Vsebuje programske napake, ki niso bile odpravljene. V Nepalu na primer sistem deluje počasi in je včasih nedostopen; (b) informacije niso povezane s poslovnimi procesi. Sistem ImmoGest na primer ne zagotavlja praktičnih opomnikov, ko zapadejo plačila najemnine ali ko se približujejo datumi poteka najemnih pogodb; (c) sedež ne uporablja uspešno informacij, ki jih vnesejo delegacije.
For example, although ImmoGest contains information on building rents, headquarters does not use this information to compile the budget. (d) Most of the information describing staff accommodation where costs are reimbursed serves no purpose. (e) Because the system is not used to perform practical functions, delegations do not regularly update data in the system. 
Na primer, ImmoGest sicer vsebuje informacije o najemninah za stavbe, vendar sedež teh ne uporablja za pripravo proračuna; (d) večina informacij, ki se nanašajo na opise stanovanj zaposlenih, za katere se povrnejo stroški, ne služi nobenemu namenu; (e) ker se sistem ne uporablja za izvajanje praktičnih funkcij, delegacije podatkov v sistemu ne posodabljajo redno.
Moreover, there are a number of mistakes in the data. 
Poleg tega so v podatkih številne napake.
For example, some buildings are recorded in ImmoGest as owned when they are rented. 
Na primer, nekatere stavbe so v sistemu ImmoGest evidentirane kot lastniške, v resnici pa so najete.
Observations 40 57 Instead of using ImmoGest, the EEAS Infrastructure Division maintains a central Excel spreadsheet containing information on all delegation offices and residences, including information obtained through site visits. 
Opažanja 40 57 Namesto da bi oddelek za infrastrukturo ESZD uporabljal sistem ImmoGest, uporablja centralno Excelovo preglednico, ki vsebuje informacije o vseh pisarnah in rezidencah delegacij, vključno z informacijami, pridobljenimi v okviru obiskov na kraju samem.
However, some of the information in the spreadsheet is also incomplete or inaccurate. 
Vendar pa so tudi v preglednici nekatere informacije nepopolne ali netočne.
For example: (a) The condition of unoccupied buildings is not recorded. (b) There are no data on the condition of 53 residences (38 %). (c) The office space of some office buildings is inaccurate. 
Na primer: (a) stanje praznih stavb ni evidentirano; (b) ni podatkov o stanju 53 rezidenc (38 %); (c) površina pisarn v nekaterih pisarniških stavbah ni točno navedena.
For example, office space in the office building in Nepal was recorded in the spreadsheet as 1 225 m2, but the delegation confirmed it was 947 m2. (d) The condition of some office buildings and residences is not consistent with the assessment. 
Na primer, za površino pisarn v pisarniški stavbi v Nepalu je v preglednici evidentirano 1 225 m2, vendar je delegacija potrdila, da znaša 947 m2; (d) stanje nekaterih pisarniških stavb in rezidenc ni v skladu z oceno.
For example, the health and safety report assessed the office building in Nepal as 4 out of 5, but the spreadsheet recorded 3 out of 5. 
Na primer, v zdravstvenem in varnostnem poročilu je bilo stanje pisarniške stavbe v Nepalu ocenjeno z oceno 4 od 5, v preglednici pa je evidentirana ocena 3 od 5.
The condition of the residence in Washington DC was assessed as 5 out of 5, even though major maintenance work is needed. 
Stanje rezidence v Washingtonu je bilo ocenjeno z oceno 5 od 5, čeprav so tam potrebna večja vzdrževalna dela.
58 The EEAS Infrastructure Division maintains a separate inventory of owned properties. Some of the information in this inventory is also inaccurate or incomplete. 
58 Oddelek za infrastrukturo ESZD uporablja ločen popis lastniških nepremičnin, vendar pa so tudi tu nekatere informacije netočne ali nepopolne.
For example, in 2014, the residence owned in Zimbabwe was recorded as offices, the former residence in Tanzania was not included and the inventory did not indicate which buildings were still in use. 
Leta 2014 je bila na primer lastniška rezidenca v Zimbabveju evidentirana kot pisarne, nekdanja rezidenca v Tanzaniji pa ni bila vključena. Poleg tega v popisu ni bilo navedeno, katere stavbe se še uporabljajo.
59 EEAS headquarters does not, therefore, have reliable basic information on all office buildings and residences, although such information is essential to feed into the planning process by identifying where changes are necessary. 
59 Sedež ESZD torej nima zanesljivih osnovnih informacij o vseh pisarniških stavbah in rezidencah, čeprav so te informacije ključne za proces načrtovanja, saj se na njihovi podlagi določi, kje so potrebne spremembe.
At the end of 2015, the EEAS was taking steps to make ImmoGest more relevant and user friendly. 
Konec leta 2015 je ESZD sprejemala ukrepe, da bi bil sistem ImmoGest ustreznejši in uporabniku prijaznejši.
Observations 41 Planning makes insufficient use of available information and is short term Available relevant information is not used to create plans 60 The lack of reliable basic information on delegation buildings and the weaknesses in central monitoring systems (see paragraphs 50 to 59) are obstacles to effective planning by headquarters. 
Opažanja 41 Razpoložljive informacije se pri načrtovanju ne uporabljajo dovolj, načrtovanje pa je kratkoročno Razpoložljive relevantne informacije se ne uporabljajo za pripravo načrtov 60 Pomanjkanje zanesljivih osnovnih informacij o stavbah delegacij in slabosti v centralnih sistemih spremljanja (glej odstavke 50 do 59) ovirajo uspešno načrtovanje na sedežu.
Moreover, headquarters does not make effective use of available information to draw up plans for maintaining or changing buildings. 
Poleg tega sedež ne uporablja uspešno razpoložljivih informacij za pripravo načrtov za vzdrževanje ali spreminjanje stavb.
For example: (a) Headquarters does not prioritise, budget for or integrate into maintenance plans the recommendations from on-site assessments which delegations do not have the resources to implement29. 
Na primer: (a) sedež ne razvršča prednostno priporočil iz ocen, opravljenih na kraju samem, za katerih izvajanje delegacije nimajo sredstev, niti jih ne vključuje v proračunsko načrtovanje ali v načrte vzdrževanja29.
Delegations implement some recommendations from assessments regarding their buildings to address short-falls30, but not others. 
Delegacije izvajajo nekatera priporočila iz ocen, ki se nanašajo na njihove stavbe, in tako obravnavajo po-manjkljivosti30, nekaterih pa ne.
Respondents to the audit survey explained that delegations do not implement many recommendations from assessments because of the lack of human and financial resources, and local constraints. 
Anketiranci so pojasnili, da delegacije mnogih priporočil iz ocen ne izvajajo zaradi pomanjkanja človeških in finančnih virov ter lokalnih omejitev.
Health and safety recommendations, for example, are based on EU legislation, regardless of local conditions. 
Zdravstvena in varnostna priporočila na primer temeljijo na evropski zakonodaji, ne glede na lokalne razmere.
One respondent summed up the difficulties as follows: ‘Lack of human resources, lack of budget and general local conditions and procurement issues substantially undermine scheduled implemen-tation.’ 
Eden od anketirancev je težave povzel takole: pomanjkanje človeških virov, pomanjkanje proračuna ter splošni lokalni pogoji in težave pri javnem naročanju bistveno otežujejo načrtovano izvajanje.
The delegation in Nepal did not have the resources to rectify certain issues repeatedly highlighted in reports by the regional security officer. (b) Although headquarters has information on buildings in poor condition or with too much or too little space, it does not fully use it to prioritise where changes are the most needed, and to plan the related maintenance works, co-location or moves. 
Delegacija v Nepalu ni imela sredstev za razrešitev nekaterih vprašanj, ki jih je regionalni uradnik za varnost večkrat poudaril v svojih poročilih; (b) sedež sicer ima informacije o stavbah, ki so v slabem stanju ali imajo preveliko ali premajhno površino, pa jih v celoti ne uporablja za to, da bi jih prednostno razvrstil glede na to, kje so spremembe najbolj potrebne, in načrtoval z njimi povezana vzdrževalna dela, kolokacije ali selitve.
This results, for example, in the deterioration of the condition of office buildings, especially those acquired before 2000 (see Figure 4 and paragraph 23). 
Zaradi tega prihaja na primer do poslabšanja stanja pisarniških stavb, zlasti tistih, kupljenih pred letom 2000 (glej sliko 4 in odstavek 23).
The audit survey showed that 42 % of respondents realised that their office space per person exceeded the recommended maximum. 
Revizijska anketa je pokazala, da se je 42 % anketirancev zavedalo, da njihova površina na osebo presega priporočeno zgornjo mejo.
However, 47 % of these were taking no action to reduce office space and align it with the ceiling. 
Vendar jih 47 % od teh ni sprejelo nobenih ukrepov za zmanjšanje površine pisarn in uskladitev z zgornjo mejo.
In Turkey, even though office space per person exceeded the recommended maximum, there was insufficient space due to the unpractical floor layout (see Box 5). 29 For example, headquarters did not prioritise or estimate the cost of recommendations following the health and safety inspection to Nepal of November 2012. 
V Turčiji je površina na osebo v pisarnah sicer presegala priporočeno zgornjo mejo, vendar je bila zaradi nepraktične razporeditve prostorov površina premajhna (glej okvir 5); 29 Na primer, sedež ni prednostno razvrstil ali ocenil stroškov priporočil, ki so sledila zdravstvenemu in varnostnemu inšpekcijskemu pregledu v Nepalu novembra 2012.
Headquarters did not follow up in any way the recommendations regarding the residence (which the delegation did not implement). 
Sedež ni sprejel nobenih nadaljnjih ukrepov v zvezi s priporočili glede rezidence (ki jih delegacija ni izvajala).
30 For example, the 2012 evaluation of the delegation in Tanzania found that the office premises were too small and had reached their capacity. 
30 Na primer, pri oceni delegacije v Tanzaniji leta 2012 je bilo ugotovljeno, da so pisarniški prostori premajhni in da so dosegli svoje zmogljivosti.
The delegation subsequently rented part of the fourth floor from the Netherlands embassy from April 2013. 
Delegacija je nato aprila 2013 od nizozemskega veleposlaništva najela del četrtega nadstropja.
Observations 42 (c) Headquarters does not plan how to dispose of owned buildings no longer occupied by delegations. 
Opažanja 42 (c) sedež ne načrtuje, kako prodati lastniške stavbe, ki jih delegacije ne uporabljajo več.
There are no plans for most of the 20 % of owned buildings which are not used by delegations (see paragraph 25). 
Za večino od skoraj 20 % lastniških stavb, ki jih delegacije ne uporabljajo več, ni nobenih načrtov (glej odstavek 25).
As an example of good practice, when German embassies move to a new building, they are required to plan how to dispose of the former building, if owned, before buying or renting something else. (d) Headquarters does not plan the review of contributions paid by co-locating organisations. 
Primer dobre prakse so nemška veleposlaništva, ki morajo pri selitvi v novo stavbo pred njenim nakupom ali najemom načrtovati, kako prodati nekdanjo stavbo, če je ta lastniška; (d) sedež ne načrtuje pregleda prispevkov, ki jih plačajo druge organizacije za kolokacijo.
In 2013 the EEAS required delegations to charge for common areas (see paragraph 27(c)). 
Leta 2013 je ESZD zahtevala, da delegacije tem organizacijam zaračunavajo uporabo skupnih prostorov (glej odstavek 27(c)).
The EEAS has also recognised that hosted organisations should contribute to the administrative burden. 
ESZD je tudi ugotovila, da bi morale gostujoče organizacije prispevati k upravnemu bremenu.
However, the EEAS has not planned which existing agreements to review as a priority. 
Vendar pa ESZD ni načrtovala, katere obstoječe pogodbe je treba prednostno pregledati.
Managing office space in the delegation in Turkey The surface area of the delegation offices in Turkey was 5 500 m2 for 150 staff, which is equivalent to 37 m2 per person. 
Upravljanje pisarniških prostorov delegacije v Turčiji Površina pisarn delegacije v Turčiji je znašala 5 500 m2 za 150 zaposlenih, kar znaša 37 m2 na osebo.
Although this exceeds the ceiling of 35 m2 per person, the October 2008 evaluation report found that the unpractical floor layout of the building resulted in insufficient office space for staff. 
Čeprav to presega zgornjo mejo 35 m2 na osebo, je bilo v poročilu o oceni iz oktobra 2008 ugotovljeno, da so imeli zaradi nepraktične razporeditve prostorov v stavbi zaposleni premalo pisarniškega prostora.
In 2015, the project to rearrange office space within the current building and to increase office sharing has released some space and reduced the space per person to 34 m2. 
Leta 2015 se je s projektom, namenjenim preureditvi pisarniških prostorov v sedanji stavbi in povečanju souporabe pisarn, pridobilo nekaj prostora, površina na osebo pa se je zmanjšala na 34 m2.
Planning focuses on addressing short-term needs 61 The EEAS Infrastructure Division produces planning documents which incorporate elements of sound practice. 
Načrtovanje je osredotočeno na kratkoročne potrebe 61 Oddelek za infrastrukturo ESZD pripravlja dokumente o načrtovanju, ki vsebujejo elemente dobre prakse.
However, these planning documents focus on short-term needs (around 2 years) and building projects currently being prepared or explored. 
Vendar pa so ti dokumenti osredotočeni na kratkoročne potrebe (približno dveletne) in projekte v zvezi s stavbami, ki se trenutno pripravljajo ali preučujejo.
For example: (a) The 2014 and 2015 annual working documents on the EEAS building policy, which describe projects under preparation and exploration, show no planned changes in office space after 2015. 
Na primer: (a) letna delovna dokumenta o stavbni politiki ESZD za leto 2014 in 2015, ki opi-sujeta projekte, ki se pripravljajo in preučujejo, ne kažeta načrtovanih sprememb površine pisarn po letu 2015.
They state that changes in surface areas and locations will follow political decisions and the availability of resources. Box 5 
Navajata, da bodo spremembe površin in lokacij temeljile na političnih odločitvah in razpoložljivosti sredstev; Okvir 5