natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/25 93. 
3.3.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 54/25 93.
Moreover, as was the case for classical swine fever (99), the Commission has not updated its initial study, even though some of the data that were missing at the time have become available since the 2001 crisis (100). 
Poleg tega Komisija, enako kot v primeru prašičje kuge (99), ni posodobila začetne študije, čeprav je od krize leta 2001 (100) na voljo nekaj podatkov, ki so takrat manjkali.
The cost/benefit analysis of the new Community strategy of using emergency vaccination and authorising consumption of meat from animals vaccinated on European territory has not been updated, despite the changes introduced by the Office International des Epizooties (see paragraph 3) concerning the time limits for resuming commercial activities after an epidemic. 
Analiza stroškov in koristi strategije Skupnosti o uporabi cepljenja v nujnih primerih in dovoljevanju prehranjevanja z mesom cepljenih živali na ozemlju Skupnosti ni bila posodobljena kljub spremembam, ki jih je Mednarodni urad za kužne bolezni (glej odstavek 3) uvedel v zvezi z roki za obnovitev trgovskih dejavnosti po koncu epidemije živalske bolezni.
This is a significant factor, in as far as the policy change that has been made at Community level gives emergency vaccination more importance than it had before. 
Ta podatek je pomemben, če sprememba politike na ravni Skupnosti daje cepljenju v nujnih primerih večji pomen kot prej.
At the time of the audit the Court pointed out that a number of countries, some of which had concluded veterinary agreements with the Community, continued to block exports from the EU after the countries concerned had recovered their disease-free status (101). 
Sodišče je med revizijo ugotovilo, da so številne države, med katerimi so nekatere sklenile veterinarske sporazume s Skupnostjo, prepovedovale izvoze iz EU še potem, ko so zadevne države znova pridobile status območja, prostega bolezni (101).
The Commission, however, has not quantified the Community-level cost of export bans. 
Vendar Komisija ni ocenila stroška prepovedi izvoza na ravni Skupnosti.
There is a risk of bans becoming more significant if the EU pursues emergency vaccination, because of the risk that third countries that do not vaccinate may be reluctant to accept exports from zones that do. 
Te prepovedi lahko postanejo obsežnejše, če bo EU uporabljala cepljenje v nujnih primerih, saj bodo lahko tretje države, ki tega ne izvajajo, nerade sprejemale izvoze iz območij, na katerih se izvaja cepljenje.
(99) Special Report No 1/2000, paragraph 82. 
(99) Posebno poročilo št. 1/2000, odstavek 82.
(100) The 2001 Outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, 21 June 2002, The Stationery Office, London, paragraphs 1.23 to 1.29. 
(100) The 2001 Outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, 21. junij 2002, The Stationery Office, London, odstavki od 1.23 do 1.29.
For example, the estimate of losses to tourism is now available. In the case of the 2001 crisis they were valued at between 4 500 and 5 400 million pounds sterling for the United Kingdom alone (between 7 213 and 8 656 million euro at December 2001 rates). 
Od zdaj so na primer na voljo ocene izgub v turizmu zaradi krize leta 2001, ki so samo za Združeno kraljestvo ocenjene v višini med 4 500 in 5 400 milijoni funtov šterlingov (oziroma med 7 213 in 8 656 milijoni EUR po deviznem tečaju iz decembra 2001).
(101) The restrictions on exports from Member States were lifted very slowly and some were still in place. 
(101) Omejitve izvoza iz držav članic so bile odpravljene pozno, nekatere veljajo še vedno.
The Netherlands, for example, was still having difficulties with exports to the USA in September 2002, even though it had officially recovered the status of FMD-free country one year earlier. 
Tako je imela Nizozemska septembra 2002 še vedno težave pri izvozu v ZDA, čeprav je uradno že eno leto prej znova pridobila status države, proste slinavke in parkljevke.
Similar problems were found in France, Ireland and the United Kingdom. 
Podobne težave so odkrili v Franciji, na Irskem in v Združenem kraljestvu.
In addition, the Commission has still not updated its study on Member StatesŐ veterinary services. 
Komisija poleg tega še vedno ni posodobila študije o veterinarskih službah držav članic.
Despite the recommendations of the Parliament (102) (and of the international con-ference), that Member States introduce regular farm inspections, the Commission has not, so far, presented any proposals encouraging Member States to introduce such a system. 
Komisija kljub priporočilom Parlamenta (102), da bi države članice vzpostavile redne inšpekcije gospodarstev, in priporočilom mednarodne konference do sedaj ni predstavila predloga, s katerim bi države članice spodbudili k vzpostavitvi takšnega sistema.
Action in the financial field 98. 
Ukrepi na finančnem področju 98.
In a memorandum of April 2002 (103), the Spanish Presidency of the Council stated that agricultural insurance programmes in the livestock farming sector could provide an alternative solution to the mechanisms that are currently covered by the Emergency Fund. 
Špansko predsedstvo Sveta je v memorandumu aprila 2002 (103) pojasnilo, da bi lahko bili programi kmetijskega zavarovanja v živinoreji alternativna rešitev za sedanje mehanizme, ki jih pokriva sklad za nujne primere.
Following that memorandum, and earlier recommendations by the Court and the discharge authority (see paragraph 59 and Box 4), the Commission, in January 2003, ordered a study on insurance against the risks associated with animal diseases. 
Komisija je v odgovor na ta memorandum in prejšnja priporočila Sodišča in organov, ki sprejmejo sklep o razrešitvi (glej odstavek 59 in okvir 4), januarja 2003 financirala študijo o zavarovanjih, ki pokrivajo tveganja, povezana z živalskimi boleznimi.
The study highlighted the inconsistencies of the current system and was clearly in favour of generalised introduction in the Member States of financial systems managed by farmers themselves, with their own financial contributions, to encourage them to participate in disease control. 
Študija, ki odkriva nedoslednosti sedanjega sistema, jasno govori v prid splošne vzpostavitve sistemov financiranja v državah članicah, ki bi jih upravljali rejci sami in vanje tudi finančno prispevali; s tem bi jih spodbudili k sodelovanju pri nadzoru bolezni.
In the case of compensation for indirect losses, the study suggested introducing a system of voluntary insurance between farmers in the form of a mutual fund of some kind. 
Študija za nadomestilo neposrednih izgub (izgub iz poslovanja) predlaga vzpostavitev prostovoljnega sistema zavarovanj med rejci v obliki vzajemnega sklada.
Due to the recency of this study (May 2003), the Commission has not yet proposed amendments to the current system and has not laid down implementing procedures for the financial contribution to Member StatesŐ expenditure. 
Komisija zaradi nedavnih rezultatov te študije (maj 2003) še vedno ni predlagala spremembe sedanjega sistema niti določila načinov izvrševanja finančnega prispevka k izdatkom držav članic.
The need to complete the single market led the Community to ban preventive vaccination of livestock against FMD. 
Skupnost je zaradi potrebe po dokončanju enotnega trga prepovedala preventivno cepljenje živali proti slinavki in parkljevki.
At the time the choice was justified by commercial considerations and it was assumed that the counterpart would be a system of disease prevention and control that would make it possible to recover FMD-free status rapidly. 
Ta izbira, ki so jo tedaj upravičevali s trgovinskimi razlogi, naj bi ponudila sistem preprečevanja in nadzora bolezni, ki bi omogočil hitro ponovno pridobitev statusa območja, prostega bolezni.
The Community accordingly introduced prevention and control arrangements which effectively take into account the risks associated with the free movement of animals and animal products and seek to limit the risk of the virus being introduced into Community territory, as well as the risk of its becoming widespread throughout Community territory (see paragraph 6). 
Skupnost je zato vzpostavila sistem preprečevanja in nadzora, ki dejansko upošteva tveganja, povezana s prostim pre-tokom živali in proizvodov živalskega izvora, in katerega namen je omejitev tveganj vnosa virusa in njegovega širjenja na ozemlju Skupnosti (glej odstavek 6).
(102) Report on the proposal for a Council Directive on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease and amending Directive 92/426/EEC, European Parliament, doc. 
(102) Poročilo o predlogu direktive Sveta o uvedbi ukrepov Skupnosti za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke in spremembi Direktive 92/426/EGS, dok.
(103) Doc. 
(103) Dok.
C 54/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 102. 
C 54/26 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 3.3.2005 102.
In the nature of things such arrangements cannot be completely effective under all circumstances, but in the absence of full and timely appraisals and checks by the Commission some of the shortcomings of the arrangements, and deficiencies in their implementation by the Member States, could not be corrected in time. 
Čeprav takšen sistem zaradi svoje narave ne more biti popolnoma učinkovit v vseh okoliščinah, nekaterih pomanjkljivosti sistema in slabosti pri njegovem izvajanju s strani držav članic ni bilo mogoče pravočasno odpraviti, ker Komisija ni v primernem času izvedla izčrpne ocene in nadzorov.
The omissions of the Community regulations were not corrected before the 2001 crisis, although some Commission proposals predated the crisis (see paragraphs 18 to 43). 
Pomanjkljivosti predpisov Skupnosti kljub nekaterim predlogom Komisije, ki jih je predstavila pred krizo (glej odstavke 18–43), namreč niso bile odpravljene pred krizo leta 2001.
During the 2001 crisis the Commission was confronted with a large-scale epidemic, but quickly identified the shortcomings of the prevention and control arrangements and their implementation by some of the Member States, especially as regards the number of government vets and systems for notifying the disease and implementing culls. 
Komisija je med krizo leta 2001, ko se je morala spopasti z epidemijo živalske bolezni velikih razsežnosti, hitro odkrila pomanjkljivosti sistema preprečevanja in nadzora bolezni ter njegove uporabe v nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti nezadostno število državnih veterinarjev, ter sisteme na področju prijave bolezni in izvajanja zakolov.
However, it was impossible to rectify these shortcomings immediately (see paragraphs 48 to 58) They were a contributory factor in the increased financial cost of the 2001 epidemic. 
Vendar je bilo to nemogoče takoj odpraviti (glej odstavke 48–58). Te pomanjkljivosti so samo še povečale finančne stroške epidemije živalske bolezni leta 2001.
Moreover one Member State had its disease-free status officially withdrawn for 11 months under the OIE animal health code, while the Union, for all practical purposes, lost that status for over a year in that its exports were blocked by non-member countries. 
Ena država članica je bila poleg tega ob uporabi Mednarodnega zoosanitarnega kodeksa Mednarodnega urada za kužne bolezni enajst mesecev uradno brez statusa območja, prostega bolezni, in tudi Unija je bila brez tega statusa več kot eno leto, ker so tretje države prepovedale izvoze z njenega ozemlja.
The audit revealed that the effectiveness of the control arrangements relied heavily on farmers notifying the disease immediately and complying with movement restrictions. 
Revizija je pokazala, da je bila učinkovitost sistema nadzora odvisna predvsem od hitre prijave bolezni s strani rejcev in njihovega upoštevanja omejitev premikov.
The Court also found that the system of funding could be further improved: the scope of compensation and reimbursement is poorly defined, some Member States have still not been reimbursed, and treatment of farmers varies, depending on the location of the holding or the method of slaughter (see paragraphs 60 to 73). 
Sodišče poleg tega odkriva, da je sistem financiranja mogoče izboljšati: obseg nadomestil in povračila je slabo določen, nekatere države članice še vedno niso prejele povračil in rejci so obravnavani neenako glede na lokacijo njihovega gospodarstva ali glede na metodo zakola (glej odstavke 60–73).
The rules and procedures governing the eligibility of Member StatesŐ expenditure for Community reimbursement were laid down at a late stage (see paragraphs 74 to 83). 
Pravila in postopki o upravičenosti do povračila Skupnosti za izdatke držav članic so bili pozno določeni (glej odstavke 74–83).
Following Commission checks, payments for the United Kingdom and France were reduced by 58,1 % and 2,7 %, i.e. 573,2 million euro and 0,1 million euro respectively. 
Izplačila za Združeno kraljestvo in Francijo so se po nadzorih, ki jih je opravila Komisija, zmanjšala za 58,1 % in 2,7 % oziroma za 573,2 milijona EUR in 0,1 milijona EUR. 105.
Since then, the Council and the Commission have remedied many of the omissions in the legislation (see paragraphs 90 and 91). 
Svet in Komisija sta od takrat odpravila številne pomanjkljivosti v zakonodaji (glej odstavka 90–91).
The texts adopted are clear evidence that the Commission has learnt, and is still learning, from the experience acquired during the crisis. 
Sprejeti dokumenti kažejo, da se je Komisija naučila in se še uči na izkušnjah, ki jih je pridobila med krizo.
Some of the weaknesses persist nevertheless, and threaten to compromise the effectiveness of Community disease prevention and control. 
Vendar nekatere pomanjkljivosti še ostajajo in lahko še vedno ogrožajo učinkovitost preprečevanja in nadzora bolezni s strani Skupnosti.
This is particularly true as regards surveillance programmes, notification of FMD, and rapid culling (see paragraph 92). 
Predvsem gre za primer programov nadzorovanja, prijave slinavke in parkljevke ter hitrost zakolov (glej odstavek 92).
Community regulations now require Member States to put in place penalties for non-compliance with the national rules implementing Community directives. 
Predpisi Skupnosti seveda odslej od držav članic zahtevajo uvedbo kazni v primeru kršitev nacionalnih določb, sprejetih na podlagi direktiv Skupnosti.
They do not, however, include incentives to encourage farmers to participate actively in prevention and control. 
Vendar ne predvidevajo ukrepov, ki bi rejce spodbudili k dejavnemu sodelovanju pri preprečevanju in nadzoru bolezni.
In particular, farmers do not make a direct contribution to the Community funding for prevention and control arrangements. 
Rejci zlasti ne prispevajo k financiranju sistema preprečevanja in nadzora s strani Skupnosti.
Moreover, the funding system has still not been revised. 
Poleg tega sistem financiranja še vedno ni bil revidiran.
In spite of these omissions the current arrangements may give rise to reimbursements to Member States, leaving a substantial persistent financial risk to the Community budget. 
Sedanji sistem kljub pomanjkljivostim omogoča začetek izplačevanja povračil državam članicam, pri čemer ostaja veliko finančno tveganje za proračun Skupnosti.
On the basis of the above findings the Court recommends: (a) outside crisis periods, regular evaluation of the prevention and control arrangements and increased supervision of their implementation; (b) a study of ways of involving farmers more closely in rapid notification of disease and compliance with movement restrictions; (c) clarification of the financial framework applicable to epidemics of animal disease, combined with maximum reduction of the financial risks to the Community budget. in Luxembourg on 21 July 2004. 
Sodišče na podlagi teh ugotovitev priporoča, da: (a) se zunaj obdobja krize redno ocenjuje sistem preprečevanja in nadzora bolezni ter okrepi nadzor nad njegovim izvajanjem; (b) se preučijo sredstva, ki bi omogočila večjo pritegnitev rejcev k hitremu prijavljanju bolezni in upoštevanju omejitev premikov; (c) se pojasni finančni okvir za epidemije živalskih bolezni in hkrati čim bolj zmanjšajo finančna tveganja za proračun Skupnosti.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/27 SUMMARY I. Directive 90/423/EEC, amending Directive 85/511/EEC on control measures for FMD, sets up a comprehensive system for the prevention, control and eradication of the disease. 
3.3.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 54/27 POVZETEK I. Direktiva 90/423/EGS, ki spreminja Direktivo 85/511/EGS o nadzornih ukrepih za slinavko in parkljevko, vzpostavlja celovit sistem za preprečevanje, nadzor in odpravo bolezni.
While banning prophylactic vaccination for technical and economic reasons, the Directive introduced contingency planning for FMD and a system of antigen reserves to cater for the possibility of emergency vaccination, and modified other animal health legislation in order to prevent the spread of the disase. 
S prepovedjo profilaktičnega cepljenja iz tehničnih in ekonomskih razlogov, je Direktiva za slinavko in parkljevko uvedla načrtovanje dela v nepredvidenih razmerah, sistem rezerv antigenov za primer nujnega cepljenja ter spremenjeno drugo zakonodajo o zdravju živali s ciljem preprečitve širjenja bolezni.
In 1990 the Commission defined the overall strategy of the Community as follows: ÔMaintain the FMD-and infection-free status of the Community without practising prophylactic vaccinationŐ. 
Leta 1990 je Komisija opredelila celotno strategijo Skupnosti, kot sledi: „Vzdrževati status Skupnosti kot področja brez slinavke in parkljevke ter okužb brez izvajanja profilaktičnega cepljenja“.
This strategy has since been supported by Member States, the European Parliament and the relevant industries. 
To strategijo od takrat podpirajo vse države članice, Evropski parlament in ustrezne gospodarske panoge.
It is science-based, operates on established international standards and balances the risk of virus introduction with the technical and economical possibilities to react to the occurrence of the disease. 
Strategija temelji na znanosti, deluje po uveljavljenih mednarodnih standardih in uravna-va nevarnost vnosa virusa s tehničnimi in ekonomskimi odzivnimi možnostmi v primeru pojava bolezni.
Furthermore, the Commission feels that, although this strategy is not formally updated, it incorporates enough regular scientific information to be operational (1). 
Komisija poleg tega meni, da ta strategija, čeprav uradno ni posodobljena, za svoje izvajanje vsebuje dovolj točnih znanstvenih informacij (1).
(1) Following the outbreaks of FMD in Italy and Greece, to which the Court refers below, the Commission together with the Member States analysed in the Standing Veterinary Committee the epidemiological situation and the effects of the control measures applied; based on the output of working groups involving all Member States, a report was prepared in 1998 outlining the principles of a future FMD control policy. 
(1) Po izbruhih epidemije slinavke in parkljevke v Italiji in Grčiji, na katere se spodaj sklicuje Sodišče, je Komisija skupaj z državami članicami v Stalnem veterinarskem odboru analizirala epidemiološke razmere in učinke uporabljenih nadzornih ukrepov; na osnovi rezultatov delovnih skupin, v katerih so sodelovale vse države članice, je bilo leta 1998 pripravljeno poročilo, ki podaja pregled načel bodoče politike nadzora nad slinavko in parkljevko.
The Scientific Committee also prepared a report on emergency vaccination in 1999. 
Znanstveni odbor je prav tako pripravil poročilo o nujnem cepljenju leta 1999.
Each year the Commission coordinates the position of Member States in the General Session of the OIE, including positions on the FMD chapter of the Animal Health Code. 
Komisija vsako leto na generalnem zasedanju OIE (Mednarodni urad za epizootije) usklajuje stališča držav članic, vključno s stališči glede poglavja „slinavka in parkljevka“ v Kodeksu zdravstvenega stanja živali.
Member States, together with the Commission as observer, discuss biannually the FMD situation in the world and Europe within the framework of the European Commission for the Control of FMD at the FAO. 
V okviru Evropske komisije za nadzor nad slinavko in parkljevko pri FAO države članice, skupaj s Komisijo v vlogi opazovalke, dvakrat letno razpravljajo o razmerah v zvezi s slinavko in parkljevko v svetu ter v Evropi.
Taking into account the experience of past crises Council Directive 2001/89/EC summarised the lessons to be learned from the classical swine fever epidemic in parts of the EC in 1996/97 and provided ample opportunity to discuss key strategies for the control and eradication of major infectious livestock diseases. 
Ob upoštevanju izkušenj preteklih kriz je Direktiva Sveta 2001/89/ES povzela spoznanja, ki so bila pridobljena ob epidemiji klasične prašičje kuge v delih ES v letih 1996/1997, in podala številne možnosti za razpravo o ključnih strategijah za nadzor in odpravo velikih nalezljivih bolezni rejnih živali.
More recently, and in the light of the 2001 outbreak, the Community strategy defined in 1990 was unanimously reconfirmed by the International Conference in December 2001, by the Resolution of the EP in December 2002, in the Commission proposal for a new Directive submitted to the Council in December 2002, and finally by the Council adopting Directive 2003/85/EC following an opinion of the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. 
Nedavno in v luči epidemije iz leta 2001 je bila strategija Komisije, določene v letu 1990, soglasno potrjena na mednarodni konferenci v decembru 2001, z resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta decembra 2002, v predlogu Komisije o novi direktivi, ki je bila Svetu predložena decembra 2002, in nazadnje z Direktivo Sveta 2003/85/ES, po mnenju Evropskega parlamenta, Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Evropskega odbora regij.
As far as an assessment of the CommissionŐs action before the crisis is concerned, the report of the British National Audit Office on FMD notes under 9c: Ôif contingency plans were not sufficient to deal with an outbreak on this scale, it is unrealistic to expect that any could have coped with all the problems and difficulties that arose or that the authorities could have forecast the unprecedented nature of the 2001 outbreakŐ. 
V zvezi z vrednotenjem dejavnosti Komisije pred krizo britanski National Audit Office (NAO) v svojem poročilu o slinavki in parkljevki v opombi k točki 9c ugotavlja: „Če načrtovano delovanje v nepredvidenih razmerah ni zadoščalo za obravnavo epidemije takšnega obsega, je nerealno pričakovati, da bi lahko kdor koli obvladal nastale probleme in težave oziroma, da bi lahko pristojni organi napovedali značaj epidemije iz leta 2001, ki je brez primere“.
Whilst at the time of FMD crisis in 2001 not all measures in preparation were ready for implementation, due credit or acknowledgement as regards the progress which has been achieved by the Commission since the establishment of the single market in 1993 is not given in the present report. 
Čeprav v času krize slinavke in parkljevke leta 2001 vsi ukrepi v pripravi niso bili pripravljeni za izvajanje, sedanje poročilo ne priznava Komisiji, kot bi bilo treba, zaslug v zvezi z napredkom, ki ga je dosegla po ustanovitvi enotnega trga leta 1993.