natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
At the end of January 2016, 236 000 Burundians have fled their country and are now mostly hosted in refugee camps in Rwanda and Tanzania (see Annex III about the number of Burundian refugees per country of the region). 
Do konca januarja 2016 je svojo državo zapustilo 236 000 Burundijcev, ki zdaj večinoma prebivajo v begunskih taboriščih v Ruandi in Tanzaniji (glej Prilogo III za število burundijskih beguncev na državo v regiji).
Internally Displaced People (IDP) settlement of Kibabi ‐ Kishusha, Masisi, North Kivu (6 360 people at the end of August 2015) 1 It is ranked 176th, out of 188, in the world on the UNDP Human Development Index for 2014. 
Naselje za notranje razseljene osebe Kibabi–Kishusha, teritorij Masisi, Severni Kivu (6 360 oseb konec avgusta 2015) 1 Na indeksu človekovega razvoja za leto 2014 Programa Združenih narodov za razvoj je Kongo uvrščen kot 176. od 188 držav.
Burundi is 184th, Rwanda and Uganda are 163th and Tanzania is 151th. 
Burundi je na 184. mestu, Ruanda in Uganda na 163., Tanzanija pa na 151.
Picture 1 Introduction 09 03 Article 214 of the Treaty of on the functioning of the EU underpins the commitment of the EU to provide humanitarian aid consisting of assistance, relief and protection to victims of natural and man-made disasters around the world. 
Uvod 09 03 Člen 214 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije je temelj zaveze EU o zagotavljanju humanitarne pomoči, in sicer pomoči, podpore in zaščite žrtvam naravnih nesreč ali nesreč, ki jih je povzročil človek, po vsem svetu.
The overall policy framework for humanitarian assistance is outlined in the ‘European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid’ of 20082. 
Splošni okvir politike za humanitarno pomoč je prikazan v Evropskem soglasju o humanitarni pomoči2.
This political document sets out the EU’s vision based on common principles aiming at improving the coherence, effectiveness and quality of its humanitarian response. 
V tem političnem dokumentu je predstavljena vizija EU, ki temelji na skupnih načelih, katerih cilj je izboljšati skladnost, uspešnost in kakovost njenega humanitarnega odziva.
04 The principal objectives (see Box 1) and provisions for the implementation and administration of humanitarian aid by the Commission are laid out in the Humanitarian Aid Regulation of 19963. 
04 Glavni cilji (glej okvir 1) in določbe Komisije v zvezi z izvajanjem in upravljanjem humanitarne pomoči so določeni v uredbi o humanitarni pomoči iz leta 19963.
Its assistance targets the most vulnerable populations and is based on the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence. 
Komisija namenja pomoč, ki temelji na humanitarnih načelih humanosti, nevtralnosti, nepristranskosti in neodvisnosti, najbolj ranljivim skupinam prebivalstva.
It also provides support for the defence of humanitarian work and the respect of humanitarian principles and international humanitarian law (IHL). 
Podporo zagotavlja tudi obrambi humanitarnega dela ter spoštovanju humanitarnih načel in mednarodnega humanitarnega prava.
2 Joint Statement by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission (OJ C 25, 30.1.2008, p. 
2 Skupna izjava Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, Evropskega parlamenta in Evropske komisije (UL C 25, 30.1.2008, str.
3 Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid (OJ L 163, 2.7.1996, p. 
1257/96 z dne 20. junija 1996 o humanitarni pomoči (UL L 163, 2.7.1996, str.
4 Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96. 
4 Člen 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1257/96.
Introduction 10 05 For the AGL region, the initial budget5 allocated by the Commission for humanitarian aid ranged between 52 million euros in 2011 and 47 million euros in 2015. 
Uvod 10 05 Prvotni proračun5, ki ga je Komisija dodelila za humanitarno pomoč na območju afriških Velikih jezer, se je gibal med 52 milijoni EUR leta 2011 in 47 milijoni EUR leta 2015.
The amount spent after receiving the top-up funding from the EU Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR)6 or from the European Development Fund (EDF)7 reached, on average, 63 million euros annually (see Graph 1). 
Po prejemu dodatnih sredstev iz rezerve EU za nujno pomoč6 ali iz Evropskega razvojnega sklada (ERS)7 je porabljeni znesek dosegel povprečno 63 milijonov EUR letno (glej diagram 1).
In addition to these amounts, the Commission spent, annually, about 1.8 million euros for its field office in the DRC and 7 million euros for aerial transport in the AGL region8. 
Poleg teh zneskov je Komisija letno porabila približno 1,8 milijona EUR za svoj terenski urad v DR Kongo in 7 milijonov EUR za letalske prevoze na območju afriških Velikih jezer8.
06 As a humanitarian aid donor, the Commission’s worldwide funding is channelled through about 200 partners9 with whom they have signed a framework partnership agreement (FPA)10 for a duration of 4 to 5 years. 
06 Komisija kot donatorka humanitarne pomoči sredstva po svetu dodeljuje preko približno 200 partnerjev9, ki so podpisali okvirne sporazume o partnerstvu10 za obdobje štirih do petih let.
These partners are international non-governmental organisations (NGOs), international organisations (IOs)11 or agencies from the United Nations (UN). 
Ti partnerji so mednarodne nevladne organizacije, mednarodne organizacije11 ali agencije Združenih narodov (ZN).
In the AGL region, the split was: 46 % NGOs, 7.3 % IOs and 46.7 % UN. 
Na območju afriških Velikih jezer so bila ta sredstva razdeljena takole: 46 % nevladne organizacije, 7,3 % mednarodne organizacije in 46,7 % ZN.
Given the specificities of humanitarian aid, the projects funded last between a couple of months and 18 months. 
Zaradi posebnosti humanitarne pomoči so financirani projekti trajali od nekaj do 18 mesecev.
07 Annually the Commission decides on the allocation of the initial budgetary envelope for humanitarian aid in a worldwide decision. 
07 Komisija vsako leto sprejme sklep o začetni proračunski ovojnici za humanitarno pomoč za ves svet.
The proposed responses per crisis, country or region as well as the corresponding budget are detailed in the Humanitarian Implementation Plans (HIP) and Technical Annex (including operational recommendations), established on the basis of a needs assessment. 
Predlagani odzivi v zvezi s posamezno krizo, državo ali regijo in ustrezni proračun so podrobno določeni v humanitarnih izvedbenih načrtih in tehnični prilogi (vključno z operativnimi priporočili), ki so sestavljeni na podlagi ocene potreb.
08 In the case of the AGL region, there is a major assessment (or selection exercise) of funding requests received, at the beginning of the year. 
08 Za območje afriških Velikih jezer se na začetku leta opravi obširna ocena (ali izbor) prejetih vlog za financiranje.
Additional assessments may take place in the course of the year according to the evolution of the situation. 
Glede na spremembo razmer se lahko med letom opravijo še dodatne ocene.
The selected projects have a duration of between 3 and 12 months. 
Izbrani projekti trajajo od treh do 12 mesecev.
This may be extended by up to 6 months, to a maximum of 18 months in total. 
To obdobje se lahko podaljša še za do šest mesecev, torej na skupno največ 18 mesecev.
5 From Chapter 23 02, humanitarian aid, food aid and disaster preparation, section 3 of the general budget of the EU. 
5 Iz poglavja 23 02, Humanitarna pomoč, pomoč v hrani in pripravljenost na nesreče, oddelek 3 splošnega proračuna EU.
6 The EAR is designed to enable a rapid response to specific aid requirements for non-EU countries that were unforeseeable when the budget was drawn up. 
6 Rezerva za dodatno pomoč je zasnovana za omogočanje hitrega odziva na posebne potrebe tretjih držav po pomoči, ki jih v času priprave proračuna ni bilo mogoče predvideti.
Priority is given to humanitarian operations, but the reserve may also be used for civil crisis management and protection if necessary. 
Prednost imajo humanitarne operacije, toda rezervo je po potrebi mogoče uporabiti tudi za civilno krizno upravljanje in zaščito.
Decisions on its use are taken by the Council and the European Parliament, on a proposal from the Commission. 
Odločitev o uporabi rezerve sprejmeta Svet in Evropski parlament na predlog Komisije.
7 A reserve of 204 million euros, approximately 0.7 % of the total 11th EDF, for the period 2014-2020, is set aside in order to finance humanitarian and emergency operations in ACP countries only in cases of unforeseen needs which cannot be covered by funds planned in ECHO’s programme. 
7 Za obdobje 2014–2020 so za financiranje humanitarnih in nujnih operacij v državah AKP rezervirani 204 milijoni EUR, kar je približno 0,7 % skupnih sredstev 11. ERS. Ta sredstva so namenjena le za nepredvidene potrebe, ki jih ni mogoče kriti s sredstvi, načrtovanimi v programu GD ECHO.
ECHO is in charge of administering this reserve and may be using the funds after having received the EEAS and DG International Cooperation and Development’s agreement. 
GD ECHO je zadolžen za upravljanje te rezerve in lahko sredstva uporabi, potem ko sta v to privolila ESZD in GD za mednarodno sodelovanje in razvoj.
8 The total amount of the contract is higher. This is because ECHO Flight also flies in other countries outside the AGL region such as Mali, Kenya, Chad, on an ad hoc basis. 
8 Skupni znesek pogodbe je višji, ker služba ECHO Flight priložnostno leti tudi v druge države izven območja afriških Velikih jezer, kot so Mali, Kenija in Čad.
9 International NGOs are selected through a specific procedure carried out by DG ECHO. 
9 Mednarodne nevladne organizacije so izbrane po posebnem postopku, ki ga izvede GD ECHO.
IOs and UN agencies have to undergo an assessment as requested in Article 60 of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 
Za mednarodne organizacije in agencije ZN se opravi ocena, kot zahteva člen 60 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št.
10 A Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement (FAFA) with UN agencies. 
10 Okvirni finančni in upravni sporazum z agencijami ZN.
11 International Committee of the Red Cross, International Federation of the Red Cross and the International Organisation for Migration. 
11 Mednarodni odbor Rdečega križa, Mednarodna zveza društev Rdečega križa in Mednarodna organizacija za migracije (IOM).
Introduction 11 Repartition of the HIP allocation per main areas for the period 2011‐2015 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Uvod 11 Porazdelitev dodeljenih sredstev v okviru humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta po glavnih področjih za obdobje 2011–2015 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
09 Burundi crisis: refugees in Rwanda and Tanzania Central African Republic crisis: refugees in the North of the DRC Assistance to refugee camps / settlements in Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania DRC non-conflict areas (response to severe acute malnutrition and to epidemics) DRC conflict Eastern Congo and Katanga province 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 12 Beginning of 2016, there were 48 field offices in 40 countries and 12 regional offices. 
09 Kriza v Burundiju: begunci v Ruandi in Tanzaniji Pomoč begunskim taboriščem/naseljem v Ugandi, Ruandi, Burundiju in Tanzaniji Kriza v Srednjeafriški republiki: begunci na severu DR Kongo Nekonfliktna območja v DR Kongo (odziv na hudo akutno podhranjenost in epidemije) Konfliktna območja v DR Kongo: vzhodni del DR Kongo in provinca Katanga 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 12 V začetku leta 2016 je mreža obsegala 48 terenskih uradov v 40 državah in 12 regionalnih uradov.
13 Sectorial experts providing support to country offices are located in regional offices. 
13 Sektorski strokovnjaki, ki zagotavljajo podporo uradom za to državo, delujejo v regionalnih uradih.
From mid-2015, Kinshasa becomes a regional office providing support to the Republic of Congo, Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania. 
Sredi leta 2015 je urad v Kinšasi postal regionalni urad. Podporo zagotavlja Republiki Kongo, Angoli, Burundiju, Ruandi in Tanzaniji.
A key feature of the Commission’s interventions is its presence in the field. 
Ključna značilnost intervencij Komisije je njena prisotnost na terenu.
It has put in place an extensive field network with offices located in crisis zones where EU-funded relief aid is being delivered12. The main functions of this network are: (a) to provide headquarters in Brussels with up-to-date information and analysis on needs for a given country, region or crisis; (b) to contribute to the development of humanitarian intervention strategies; (c) to give technical support to EU-funded humanitarian operations; (d) to monitor the implementation of EU-funded projects; (e) to facilitate donor coordination at field level. 
Vzpostavila je obsežno terensko mrežo z uradi na kriznih območjih, na katera se dostavlja nujna pomoč, ki jo financira EU.12 Glavne naloge te mreže so: (a) zagotavljati sedežu v Bruslju najnovejše informacije in analize v zvezi s posamezno državo, regijo ali krizo; (b) prispevati k razvoju strategij humanitarnih intervencij; (c) zagotavljati tehnično podporo za humanitarne operacije, ki jih financira EU; (d) spremljati izvajanje projektov, ki jih financira EU; (e) pomagati pri usklajevanju donatorjev na terenu.
10 In the DRC, the field network is comprised of the head office in Kinshasa, one country sub office in Goma and an antenna in Bukavu. 
10 Terensko mrežo v DR Kongo sestavljajo glavni urad v Kinšasi, podurad za to državo v Gomi in področni urad v Bukavuju.
It has five expatriated experts (‘Technical assistants’) and 12 local staff (‘National staff’). 
Za mrežo dela pet strokovnjakov iz tujine (strokovnjaki za humanitarno pomoč) in 12 lokalnih uslužbencev (nacionalni uslužbenci).
In addition, several sectoral experts (food, protection, health ...) based in the regional support office in Nairobi (Kenya) contribute as needed to the selection, monitoring and assessment of projects in the African Great Lakes region13. millioneuro Graph 1 
Poleg tega je v regionalnem podpornem uradu v Nairobiju (Kenija) več sektorskih strokovnjakov (prehrana, zaščita, zdravje ...), ki po potrebi pomagajo pri izboru, spremljanju in ocenjevanju projektov na območju afriških Velikih jezer13. v milijonih EUR Diagram 1
Audit scope and approach 12 11 We examined whether the Commission effectively managed its funding for humanitarian aid targeted at populations affected by conflicts in the African Great Lakes region. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski 12 pristop 11 Sodišče je preučilo, ali je Komisija uspešno upravljala svoje financiranje humanitarne pomoči, namenjene prebivalstvu na območju afriških Velikih jezer, ki so ga prizadeli konflikti.
Our audit focused on the following three main questions: (a) Did the Commission allocate its funding to well-established priorities? (b) Did the Commission monitor the projects properly? (c) Did the projects achieve their objectives? 
Naša revizija je bila osredotočena na tri glavna vprašanja: (a) Ali je Komisija svoja sredstva dodelila za ustrezno določene prednostne naloge? (b) Ali je Komisija ustrezno spremljala projekte? (c) Ali so projekti dosegli svoje cilje?
12 The audit covered the Commission’s support during the period 2011-2015 to the AGL region consisting of the DRC, Uganda14, Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania. 
12 Revizija se je nanašala na podporo, ki jo je Komisija v obdobju 2011–2015 namenila območju afriških Velikih jezer, v katerega spadajo DR Kongo, Uganda14, Ruanda, Burundi in Tanzanija.
It was carried out between May and December 2015 and included the following: (a) A review of EU policy documents and strategy documents related to humanitarian aid, and other relevant documentation and reports. (b) Interviews with Commission officials and with partners’ representatives. (c) A review of 19 projects, for a cumulative amount of 42.9 million euros (out of a total number of 164 projects, costing 255.3 million euros), that were implemented during the period 2011-2014, plus the ECHO Flight service contract15 for aerial transport (see list in Annex IV). 
Revizija je potekala od maja do novembra 2015 in je zajela: (a) pregled dokumentov EU o politikah in njenih strateških dokumentov, povezanih s humanitarno pomočjo, ter druge ustrezne dokumentacije in poročil; (b) pogovore z uradniki Komisije in predstavniki partnerjev; (c) pregled 19 projektov v kumulativnem znesku v višini 42,9 milijona EUR (od skupaj 164 projektov, ki so stali 255,3 milijona EUR), izvedenih v obdobju 2011–2014, ter pogodbe o storitvah službe ECHO Flight15 za letalske prevoze (glej seznam v Prilogi IV).
The selection criteria included materiality, geographical and sectoral coverage, period of implementation, nature of aid and type of partners. (d) Visits to the DRC from 16 to 25 September 2015 and to Tanzania, Rwanda and Uganda from 30 September to 8 October 2015 which included interviews with staff in the field, EU delegation staff, partners’ representatives and beneficiaries as well as on-the-spot visits to 10 projects. 
Izbirna merila so vključevala pomembnost, geografsko in sektorsko pokritost, obdobje izvajanja, vrsto pomoči in vrsto partnerjev; (d) obisk v DR Kongo od 16. do 25. septembra 2015 ter obiske v Tanzaniji, Ruandi in Ugandi od 30. septembra do 8. oktobra 2015. Obiski so zajemali pogovore z uslužbenci na terenu, uslužbenci v delegaciji EU, predstavniki partnerjev in upravičenci ter obiske na kraju samem pri desetih projektih.
14 In the 2015 programming, the Commission decided to take Uganda out of the AGL HIP and add it in the Horn of Africa HIP. This is because an allocation for Uganda was approved under the HIP 2015 for the Horn of Africa region in order to respond to the influx of South Sudanese refugees and, according to a Commission internal rule, a country cannot be covered under two different HIPs. 
14 Komisija se je pri načrtovanju programov za leto 2015 odločila, da bo Ugando izvzela iz humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta za afriška Velika jezera in jo vključila v humanitarni izvedbeni načrt za območje Afriškega roga, saj je bila dodelitev za Ugando namenjena odzivu na pritok beguncev iz Južnega Sudana in zato odobrena v okviru humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta za območje Afriškega roga, v skladu z internim pravilom Komisije pa država ne more biti zajeta v dva različna humanitarna izvedbena načrta.
Observations 13 Funding allocated to well established main priorities 16 See webpage: http://www. inform-index.org/Home but insufficient clarity at further prioritisation stage 13 We examined whether the Commission allocated humanitarian aid to well established priorities by looking at how the humanitarian needs for the region were identified, what response the Commission envisaged and whether its support went to the most relevant projects. 
Opažanja 13 Sredstva so se dodelila za ustrezno določene glavne prednostne naloge, vendar je bilo nadaljnje prednostno razvrščanje premalo jasno 13 Ali je Komisija dodelila humanitarno pomoč za ustrezno določene prednostne naloge, smo preučili tako, da smo pregledali, kako so bile ugotovljene humanitarne potrebe v regiji, kakšen odziv je predvidela Komisija in ali so njeno podporo dobili najustreznejši projekti.
The Commission has properly identified needs for the AGL region The needs assessment is evidence based 14 The Commission performs annual needs assessments for all countries/regions to which it is already providing a financial contribution. 
Komisija je ustrezno ugotovila potrebe na območju afriških Velikih jezer Ocena potreb temelji na dokazih 14 Komisija opravi letne ocene potreb za vse države/regije, ki jim že zagotavlja finančni prispevek.
It carries out ad hoc needs assessments whenever an unexpected crisis occurs, whether natural or man-made. 
Če nastopi nepričakovana kriza, naravna ali takšna, ki jo je povzročil človek, izvede ac hoc ocene potreb.
In cases of deterioration of existing and already covered crises, the Commission updates its initial needs assessment. 
Če se že obstoječe krize, za katere je bila ocena že opravljena, zaostrijo, Komisija to prvotno oceno posodobi.
This is the main exercise in preparation for its annual programming, the Humanitarian Implementation Plan (HIP). 
To je glavni del njenih priprav na letno načrtovanje programov, ki jih pripravi v obliki humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta.
15 For the AGL region, the needs assessment is based on the accumulated knowledge and experience of the operational team in Brussels and the team in the DRC’s field office. 
15 Ocena potreb za območje afriških Velikih jezer temelji na pridobljenem znanju in izkušnjah operativne ekipe v Bruslju in ekipe v terenskem uradu v DR Kongo.
The other main sources of information are (i) a range of internationally available indicators to determine a risk index value per country16 and (ii) the stakeholders in the field, namely the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) for the DRC and the Commission’s partners, humanitarian donors. 
Drugi glavni viri informacij so (i) širok nabor mednarodno razpoložljivih kazalnikov za določitev vrednosti indeksa tveganja za posamezno državo16 in (ii) deležniki na terenu, namreč Urad za usklajevanje humanitarnih dejavnosti (OCHA) za DR Kongo in donatorji humanitarne pomoči, ki so partnerji Komisije.
Observations 14 16 The needs assessment for the AGL region gives a good overview of the situation in the DRC, both in conflict and non-conflict zones, and in neighbouring countries. 
Opažanja 14 16 Ocena potreb za območje afriških Velikih jezer daje dober uvid v razmere v konfliktnih in nekonfliktnih območjih v DR Kongo in sosednjih državah.
The affected populations identified are: (a) internally displaced people (IDPs) in the DRC; (b) refugees, mainly Central African and Rwandan in the DRC and Congolese and Burundian in neighbouring countries; (c) returned people (IDPs or refugees); (d) host populations who need help to cope with the influx of refugees and IDPs; (e) other local populations weakened by the conflicts or that are very vulnerable to malnutrition or epidemics in non-conflict zones. 
Prizadete skupine prebivalstva so: (a) notranje razseljene osebe v DR Kongo; (b) begunci, zlasti iz Srednjeafriške republike in Ruande v DR Kongo ter iz Konga in Burundija v sosednjih državah; (c) vrnjene osebe (notranje razseljene osebe ali begunci); (d) gostiteljsko prebivalstvo, ki potrebuje pomoč pri obvladovanju pritoka beguncev in notranje razseljenih oseb; (e) drugo lokalno prebivalstvo, ki so ga prizadeli konflikti ali je na nekonfliktnih območjih zelo izpostavljeno slabi prehranjenosti ali epidemijam.
17 The needs identified for these categories covered a wide range: protection, food security, nutrition, health care, water and sanitation, non-food items (NFI) such as pots and pans, clothing, soap, etc. and shelter. 
17 Potrebe, ki so bile ugotovljene za te kategorije, so bile zelo raznolike: zaščita, prehranska varnost, prehrana, zdravstvena oskrba, voda in sanitarije, neprehrambeni izdelki, kot so posoda, oblačila, milo itn., ter zavetišča.
Education was not included as it was not deemed to have sufficient priority. 
Izobraževanje ni bilo zajeto, ker ni bilo ocenjeno kot dovolj prednostno.
The Commission’s response is appropriate Main priorities were well established 18 In the AGL region, the Commission’s overall objective is ‘to address urgent needs arising from population movements in conflict zone and life-threatening situations in non-conflict areas using the most appropriate response mechanisms’17. 
Odziv Komisije je ustrezen Glavne prednostne naloge so bile dobro določene 18 Splošni cilj Komisije za območje afriških Velikih jezer je obravnavati nujne potrebe, ki nastajajo zaradi preseljevanja prebivalstva na konfliktnem območju in življenjsko nevarnih razmer na nekonfliktnih območjih, z najustreznejšimi mehanizmi za odzivanje17.