natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
6 Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 7 SUMMARY I. The European geographical indications scheme aims to protect the names of products whose characteristics are associated with the geographical area in which they are produced. 
11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost? 7 POVZETEK I. Evropska shema geografskih označb je namenjena zaščiti imen proizvodov, pri katerih obstaja povezava med njihovimi značilnostmi in geografskim območjem njihove proizvodnje.
Depending on the degree and type of association with a specific geographical area, it distinguishes between two types of protected names — PDO and PGI. 
Glede na stopnjo in vrsto povezave z nekim geografskim območjem razlikuje med dvema vrstama zaščitenih imen: ZOP in ZGO.
The geographical indications scheme provides a potential economic opportunity for farmers and producers of food and can have a positive impact on the rural economy. 
Shema geografskih označb prinaša gospodarske možnosti za kmete in proizvajalce hrane in lahko ugodno vpliva na gospodarstvo na podeželju.
To achieve this objective and provide the intended protection, an appropriate EU framework needs to be in place. 
Za doseganje tega cilja in zagotavljanje načrtovane zaščite mora biti vzpostavljen ustrezen okvir EU.
The Court examined whether the scheme’s control system is conceptually robust, whether the procedures and measures used render it attractive to potential participants and whether the measures available and the Commission’s actions have contributed to increasing consumer awareness. 
Sodišče je preverilo, ali je zamisel nadzornega sistema sheme dobra, ali je shema zaradi uporabljenih postopkov in ukrepov privlačna za morebitne uporabnike ter ali so razpoložljivi ukrepi in dejavnosti Komisije prispevali k večji ozaveščenosti potrošnikov.
Checks relating to the geographical indications scheme aim to verify compliance of a PDO or PGI product with a product specification and to detect instances of disallowed use of a protected name. 
Pregledi v zvezi s shemo geografskih označb so namenjeni preverjanju skladnosti proizvodov, upravičenih do ZOP ali ZGO, z njihovimi specifikacijami in odkrivanju prepovedane uporabe zaščitenega imena.
The audit showed that further clarification on the design of the control system for these checks is needed. 
Revizija je pokazala, da so potrebna dodatna pojasnila v zvezi z zasnovo sistema nadzora za te preglede.
The provisions in the EU regulation on checks of compliance with food and feed law, animal health and welfare rules do not set out minimum requirements for Member States’ checks related to the geographical indications scheme. 
Določbe uredbe EU o preverjanju skladnosti z zakonodajo o živilih in krmi ter s pravili o zdravju in dobrem počutju živali ne opredeljujejo minimalnih zahtev za preglede držav članic v zvezi s shemo geografskih označb.
Regarding the Commission’s supervision of Member States’ checks related to the geographical indications scheme, no service within the Commission has sole responsibility for carrying out audits of the scheme and no such audits have been carried out so far. 
Za nadzor nad pregledi držav članic v zvezi s shemo geografskih označb Komisija nima ene same službe, ki bi bila v celoti odgovorna za revizije sheme geografskih označb, poleg tega pa se doslej te revizije še niso izvajale.
V. The effectiveness of the geographical indications scheme is affected by the extent to which it is used by producers and the level of consumer awareness of it. 
V. Na uspešnost sheme geografskih označb vpliva, koliko jo uporabljajo proizvajalci in poznajo potrošniki.
Potential exists to attract further producers to join the scheme, especially where the take-up is low, but the procedure for the scrutiny of applications is lengthy and discourages them. 
Obstajajo možnosti za pritegnitev nadaljnjih proizvajalcev v shemo, zlasti če se malo uporablja, vendar je postopek za preverjanje vlog dolgotrajen in odvrača proizvajalce.
In addition, producers are often not aware of the existence of the scheme. 
Poleg tega ti pogosto niti ne vedo za shemo.
A study carried out on behalf of the Commission demonstrates low rates of consumer recognition of the scheme’s symbols and concept. 
Študija, izvedena po naročilu Komisije, kaže, da potrošniki slabo poznajo simbole in zamisel sheme.
Whilst this situation calls for action to raise awareness of the geographical indications scheme, no overall strategy addressing this issue exists at EU level. 
Čeprav je zaradi takega stanja potrebno ukrepanje za povečanje ozaveščenosti o shemi geografskih označb, na ravni EU ni splošne strategije za obravnavanje tega vprašanja.
A series of measures and actions is available but these appear fragmented. 
Na voljo je vrsta ukrepov in dejavnosti, ki pa se zdijo razdrobljeni.
SUMMARY VI. 
POVZETEK VI.
The Court recommends that: — Minimum requirements on checks of product specifications are laid down in the legal provisions on the geographical indications scheme; — Further clarifications are given on the scope of regular checks aiming at disallowed practices. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj: — se v predpisih o shemi geografskih označb določijo minimalne zahteve za preverjanje specifikacij proizvodov; — se podrobneje pojasni obseg rednih pregledov za odkrivanje prepovedane prakse.
Mutual assistance rules should be adapted to the needs of the national authorities; — The Commission should include audits on Member States’ checks of the GI scheme in its plan of regular audits in the Member States; — A clear strategy is developed for the promotion of the geographical indications scheme to producers and consumers in order to raise awareness. 
Pravila o vzajemni pomoči bi bilo treba prilagoditi potrebam nacionalnih organov; — Komisija v svoj načrt rednih revizij v državah članicah vključi revizije pregledov držav članic v zvezi s shemo GO; — se oblikuje jasna strategija za promocijo sheme geografskih označb med proizvajalci in potrošniki zaradi krepitve njihove ozaveščenosti.
The Commission should explore more effective means of promoting the scheme, such as running a campaign on its own initiative. 8 Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 
Komisija bi morala preučiti sredstva za promocijo sheme, ki bi bila uspešnejša, na primer izvajanje kampanje na njeno pobudo. 8 Posebno poročilo št. 11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost?
9 INTRODUCTION THE PRINCIPLES OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS SCHEME 1. 
9 UVOD NAČELA, NA KATERIH TEMELJI SHEMA GEOGRAFSKIH OZNAČB 1.
The EU agricultural product quality policy aims to highlight individual product qualities resulting from a particular origin and/or production method. 
Politika EU na področju kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov je namenjena poudarjanju značilnosti posameznih proizvodov, ki so posledica posebnega porekla in/ali proizvodne metode.
One of the schemes, which forms part of this policy and which is the subject of this report, is the geographical indications (‘GI’) scheme for agricultural products and foodstuffs. 
Ena od shem, ki je del te politike in obenem tema tega poročila, je shema geografskih označb (GO) za kmetijske proizvode in živila.
The GI scheme is intended to protect names that identify products whose quality, reputation or other characteristic are essentially attributable to their geographical origin. 
Shema GO je namenjena zaščiti imen, ki označujejo proizvode, katerih kakovost, sloves ali druge značilnosti je mogoče pripisati predvsem njihovemu geografskemu poreklu.
These names are considered to be intellectual property rights. 
Zanje veljajo pravice intelektualne lastnine.
The scheme is inspired by national systems, such as the French appellation d’origine contrôlée (‘AOC’) or the Italian denomina-zione di origine controllata (‘DOC’) which granted protection at national level. 
Shema se zgleduje po nacionalnih sistemih, kot je francoski appellation d’origine con-trôlée („AOC“) ali italijanski denominazione di origine control-lata („DOC“), ki zagotavljajo zaščito na nacionalni ravni.
The introduction of the GI scheme in 1992 aimed to provide a framework of Community rules that would allow a single harmonised EU approach for protection of the registered product names1. 
Cilj uvedbe sheme GO leta 1992 je bil zagotoviti okvir pravil Skupnosti, ki bi omogočal enoten in usklajen pristop k zaščiti registriranih imen proizvodov v EU1.
It is presently governed by Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (‘the Regulation’)2. 
Trenutno jo ureja Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila (v nadaljevanju Uredba)2.
The GI scheme distinguishes between two types of protected names, depending on the degree and type of association with a specific geographical area: (a) Names registered as a protected designation of origin (‘PDO’) describe products having characteristics resulting essentially from the geographical area and the know-how of the producers in the area of production3. 
Glede na stopnjo in vrsto povezave z nekim geografskim območjem razlikuje med dvema vrstama zaščitenih imen. (a) Imena, registrirana kot zaščitene označbe porekla (ZOP), se uporabljajo za oznako proizvodov z značilnostmi, ki so predvsem posledica geografskega območja in znanja proizvajalcev na tem proizvodnem območju3, na katerem potekajo tudi vse faze proizvodnje.
There must be a close link between the products’ features and their geographical origin. 
Med lastnostmi proizvodov in njihovim geografskim poreklom mora obstajati tesna povezava.
Examples of well-known PDO products are ‘Queso Manchego’, ‘Prosciutto di Parma’, ‘Grana Padano’, ‘Comté’; 1 The GI scheme was first established with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 1). 
2081/92 z dne 14. julija 1992 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila (UL L 208, 24.7.1992, str. 1).
2 OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 
2 UL L 93, 31.3.2006, str.
3 Article 2(1)(a) of the Regulation. 
3 Člen 2(1)(a) Uredbe.
Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? (b) Names registered as a protected geographical indication (‘PGI’) describe products having specific characteristics or reputation associating them with a given geographical area where at least one stage of the production takes place. 
11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost? (b) Imena, registrirana kot zaščitene geografske označbe (ZGO), se uporabljajo za oznako proizvodov, ki imajo posebne lastnosti ali sloves, ki jih je mogoče pripisati nekemu geografskemu območju, na katerem poteka vsaj ena faza proizvodnje.
If the products are processed, the raw materials may come from other geographical areas4. 
Če gre za predelane proizvode, lahko surovine prihajajo z drugih geografskih območij4.
Examples of well-known PGI products are ‘Bayerisches Bier’, ‘Scotch Beef’, ‘Pruneaux d’Agen’. 
Primeri znanih proizvodov z ZGO so „Bayerisches Bier“, „Scotch Beef “, „Pruneaux d’Agen“.
The registration of a product name under either of the two types of the GI scheme is possible for products that concern a geographical area within the EU as well as in a third country where the product names are protected (e.g. China and Co-lombia). 
Ime proizvoda z eno od obeh označb iz sheme GO je mogoče registrirati za proizvode, povezane z geografskim območjem v EU in v tretji državi, v kateri so imena proizvodov zaščitena (npr. Kitajska in Kolumbija).
As at the end of 2010, 964 product names were registered under the Regulation, of which 502 as a PDO and 462 as a PGI. 
Konec leta 2010 je bilo v skladu z Uredbo registriranih 964 imen proizvodov, in sicer 502 kot ZOP in 462 kot ZGO.
The Commission has set itself the target of 1 100 registered product names by the end of 20125. 
Komisija si je določila za cilj, da bo do konca leta 2012 registriranih 1 100 imen proizvodov5.
PDO and PGI products may be recognised by means of specific EU symbols, which are intended to provide a guarantee that the products concerned relate to a particular geographical area. 
Proizvode z ZOP in ZGO je mogoče prepoznati po posebnih simbolih EU, ki veljajo kot zagotovilo, da so ti proizvodi povezani s posamezno regijo.
The logo (or the indications ‘protected designation of origin’ or ‘protected geographical indication’) has to appear on the labelling of products covered by the GI scheme. 
Logotip (ali navedba „zaščitena označba porekla“ ali „zaščitena geografska označba“) mora biti prikazan na nalepkah na proizvodih, za katere velja shema GO.
PDO and PGI logos 4 Article 2(1)(b) of the Regulation. 
Logotipa za ZOP in ZGO 4 Člen 2(1)(b) Uredbe.
5 The Commission’s Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development: Annual Activity Report 2010, Table 1.2, p. 
5 Generalni direktorat Komisije za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja. Letno poročilo o dejavnosti 2010, Tabela 1.2, str.
10 Source: Annex V to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1898/2006 (OJ L 369, 23.12.2006, p. 
10 Vir: Priloga V k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1898/2006 (UL L 369, 23.12.2006, str.
1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 628/2008 (OJ L 173, 3.7.2008, p. 3). 
1), kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št.
Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL 8. 
11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost? MOŽNOSTI ZA GOSPODARSKI RAZVOJ 8.
The overall wholesale value of PDO and PGI products registered under the Regulation is estimated to be some 15 billion euro, which is equal to around 2,5 % of the expenditure for food consumption in the EU6 and is at a similar level as the wholesale value of organic products. 
Ocenjuje se, da celotna vrednost grosistične prodaje proizvodov z ZOP in ZGO, registriranih v skladu z Uredbo, znaša okoli 15 milijard EUR, kar je približno 2,5 % izdatkov za hrano v EU6 in dosega podobno raven kot grosistična prodaja ekoloških proizvodov.
Graph 1 shows the percentage of the total wholesale value for the major classes of PDO and PGI products7. 
Spodnji diagram prikazuje odstotek skupne vrednosti grosistične prodaje za najpomembnejše razrede proizvodov z ZOP in ZGO7.
Studies show that PDO and PGI products usually have a higher producer price than products of the same product category without protected geographical indications. 
Študije kažejo, da je proizvodna cena za proizvode z ZOP in ZOG običajno višja kot za proizvode iz iste kategorije, ki niso upravičeni do zaščitenih geografskih označb.
The difference in prices observed ranged from 5 % to 300 %. 
Zaznana razlika v ceni je znašala od 5 % do 300 %.
A key reason given in the studies for this difference is the control of quality achieved through the protection of geographical indications8. 
Najpomembnejši razlog za to razliko, ki ga navajajo študije, je nadzor kakovosti, dosežene z zaščito geografskih označb8.
6 AND International: ‘Valeur de la production agricole sous AOP et IGP’ — Final report (August 2009). 
6 AND International: „Valeur de la production agricole sous AOP et IGP“ – Končno poročilo (avgust 2009).
7 Agriculture and Rural Development DG newsletter on PDO and PGI agricultural products (2010). 
7 Glasilo GD AGRI o kmetijskih proizvodih z ZOP in ZGO (2010).
8 London Economics: Evaluation of the CAP policy on the protected designations of origin (PDO) and protected geographical indications (PGI) (2008). 
8 London Economics, Vrednotenje skupne kmetijske politike na področju zaščitenih označb porekla (ZOP) in zaščitenih geografskih označb (ZGO) (2008).
11 GRAPH 1 PERCENTAGE OF WHOLESALE VALUE FOR PDO AND PGI PRODUCTS Bread, biscuits, confectionery 4% Fruit and vegetables 4% Fresh meats 6% Processed meats 16 % Others 13 % Cheeses 37 % Beers 20 % Source: European Commission, Agriculture and Rural Development DG. Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 
11 DIAGRAM 1 ODSTOTEK VREDNOSTI GROSISTIČNE PRODAJE ZA PROIZVODE Z ZOP IN ZGO Kruh, pecivo, slaščice 4% Sadje in zelenjava 4% Sveže meso 6% Predelano meso 16 % Drugo 13 % Sir 37 % Pivo 20 % Vir: Evropska Komisija, GD AGRI. Posebno poročilo št. 11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost?
The Regulation recognises the economic potential of the GI scheme and considers that it can be of considerable benefit to the rural economy by improving the income of farmers and by retaining the population in rural areas9. 
Uredba ugotavlja, da shema GO prinaša možnosti za gospodarski razvoj, in navaja mnenje, da bi lahko bila zelo koristna za gospodarstvo na podeželju, ker bi povečala dohodek kmetov in zadržala ljudi na podeželskih območjih9.
The Commission in its communication about the future of the common agricultural policy (‘CAP’) emphasised that the agricultural product quality policy, including the GI scheme, forms part of the CAP10. 
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu o prihodnosti Skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) poudarila, da je politika na področju kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov, vključno s shemo GO, del SKP10.
It contributes to maintaining the diversity of agricultural activities in rural areas and enhances competitiveness. 
Prispeva k ohranjanju raznolikosti kmetijskih dejavnosti na podeželskih območjih in povečuje konkurenčnost.
Financial measures exist, related to the GI scheme, which do not involve significant EU budgetary expenditure. 
Obstajajo finančni ukrepi, povezani s shemo GO, ki ne zahtevajo velikih proračunskih odhodkov EU.
These measures aim at promoting food quality schemes, including the GI scheme and at supporting farmers who participate in them. 
Ti ukrepi so namenjeni promociji shem za kakovost hrane, vključno s shemo GO, in podpiranju kmetov, ki v njih sodelujejo.
9 Recital 2 of the preamble to the Regulation. 
9 Uvodna izjava 2 preambule Uredbe.
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future’ (COM(2010) 672 final of 18 November 2010). 
10 Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij „Skupna kmetijska politika proti letu 2020: odziv na prihodnje izzive, povezane s hrano, naravnimi viri in ozemljem“, COM(2010) 672 konč., 18. november 2010.
12 Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 13 AUDIT OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND APPROACH 12. 
11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost? 13 CILJ IN OBSEG REVIZIJE TER REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP 12.
The Regulation states that the promotion of products having certain characteristics can be of considerable benefit to the rural economy. 
Uredba navaja, da lahko promocija proizvodov z določenimi značilnostmi močno koristi gospodarstvu na podeželju.
To achieve this objective and provide the intended protection, an appropriate EU framework needs to be in place. 
Za dosego tega cilja in zagotovitev načrtovane zaščite je potreben ustrezen okvir EU.
The audit therefore aimed to reply to the question: ‘Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective?’ 13. 
Zato je bil cilj revizije, da odgovori na naslednje vprašanje: „Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost?“ 13.
The criteria used to reply to this question are: (a) Robustness of the system defined for the checks related to the GI scheme: The producer who joins the GI scheme expects that the name of his product is properly protected against its unauthorised or improper use which may happen as a result of a higher price for registered products. 
Za odgovor na to vprašanje so bila uporabljena merila, našteta v nadaljevanju. (a) Zanesljivost sistema, določenega za preglede v zvezi s shemo GO. Proizvajalec, ki se vključi v shemo GO, pričakuje, da bo ime njegovega proizvoda ustrezno zaščiteno pred nedovoljeno ali neprimerno uporabo, do katere bi lahko prišlo zaradi višje cene registriranih proizvodov.
The consumer who buys a PDO or PGI product expects that it originates from the specified geographical area and complies with the product specification11. 
Potrošnik, ki kupi proizvod z ZOP ali ZGO, pričakuje, da proizvod izvira z navedenega geografskega območja in ustreza specifikaciji11.
A robust system for the checks related to the GI scheme needs therefore to be defined to fulfil the expectations of the two parties; (b) Attractiveness of the GI scheme: The extent to which the GI scheme is successful depends on its ability to attract producers. 
Treba je torej določiti zanesljiv sistem pregledov v zvezi s shemo GO, da bodo pričakovanja obeh udeleženih strani izpolnjena. (b) Privlačnost sheme GO. Kako uspešna bo shema GO, je odvisno od njene sposobnosti, da pritegne proizvajalce.
If these have little or no interest in the scheme, it cannot have the intended impact; (c) Consumer awareness of the GI scheme: The consumer preference for a PDO or PGI product requires that s/he is aware of the existence and the principles of the GI scheme, which guarantee that the product comes from a certain geographical area and was made according to the product specification. 
Če so ti le malo ali sploh niso zainteresirani za shemo, ta ne more dosegati načrtovanega učinka. (c) Ozaveščenost potrošnikov o shemi GO. Da bi potrošniki dali prednost proizvodom z ZOP in ZGO, morajo vedeti, da shema GO obstaja, in poznati njena načela, ki jamčijo, da proizvod izvira z opredeljenega geografskega območja in da je bil proizveden v skladu s specifikacijo.
The Court visited the responsible departments of the Commission’s Directorate-General (DG) for Agriculture and Rural Development, where interviews were held and documents examined. 
Sodišče je obiskalo pristojne oddelke Generalnega direktorata Komisije za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja (GD AGRI), kjer je opravilo razgovore in pregledalo dokumente.
The Commission’s Directorate-General for Health and Consumers was contacted to obtain information on its role concerning the Commission supervision of Member States’ checks related to the GI scheme. 
Obrnilo se je tudi na Generalni direktorat Komisije za zdravje in potrošnike (GD SANCO), da je pridobilo informacije o njegovi vlogi pri nadzoru Komisije nad pregledi, ki jih države članice izvajajo v zvezi s shemo geografskih označb.
11 The product specification concerns important aspects, such as the name of the product, its description, the definition of the geographical area, the method of obtaining the product and details bearing out the link between the product and the geographical area. Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 
11 Specifikacija proizvoda vključuje pomembne elemente, kot so ime proizvoda, njegov opis, opredelitev geografskega območja, proizvodne metode in podrobnosti o povezavi proizvoda z geografskim območjem. Posebno poročilo št. 11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost?
The responsible services in all Member States were contacted in order to obtain further evidence relating to the observations made at Commission level and additional information where available. 
Prav tako je navezalo stik s pristojnimi službami v vseh državah članicah, da bi pridobilo dodatne dokaze v zvezi z opažanji, ki veljajo za Komisijo, ter dodatne informacije, če so bile na voljo.
The information was gathered by means of an online survey and visits to authorities of the Member States12. 
Informacije so bile zbrane s spletno anketo in obiski nacionalnih organov v državah članicah12.