natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission did not make a systematic comparison but it did publish a Commission working paper (1) in December 2006 summarising several months of analysis of ERF projects in the Member States. 
Čeprav Komisija ni izvedla sistematične primerjave, je decembra 2006 objavila delovni dokument svojih služb (1), ki povzema večmesečno analizo ukrepov ESB na ravni držav članic.
Its conclusions are based on an evaluation by independent experts who give a very positive verdict on the FundŐs achievements despite its limited budget over the five years in question. 
Ugotovitve tega dokumenta se opirajo na oceno neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki so uporabo sredstev ocenili zelo pozitivno, čeprav je bil celotni znesek dodeljenih finančnih sredstev za teh pet let omejen.
The evaluation carried out by the Commission also demonstrated that: Ń social, material and medical assistance was provided in difficult circumstances under the projects carried out, which directly concerned over 600 000 persons, Ń the organisations which carried out the projects take a very positive view of the Fund, Ń seen from the angle of the Member States, some of which have more budgetary resources than others in the field of asylum, the Fund has helped to gradually establish a common asylum policy governed by Community legislation. 
Ocena, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, prav tako dokazuje, da: — je posredovanje neposredno doseglo 600 000 oseb in jim zagotovilo socialno, materialno in zdravstveno pomoč v težkih razmerah, — organizacije, ki izvajajo projekte, Sklad sprejemajo zelo pozitivno, — v okviru držav članic, med katerimi imajo nekatere več proračunskih sredstev za področje azila, je Sklad prispeval k postopnemu oblikovanju skupne azilne politike, ki jo določajo akti Skupnosti.
The quality of statistical data is gradually being improved. 
Kakovost statističnih podatkov se postopoma izboljšuje.
(1) SEC(2006) 1636, Final evaluation of the European Refugee Fund for the period 2000 to 2004. 
(1) SEC(2006) 1636, Končna ocena Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2000–2004.
The Commission acknowledges that there was a significant delay in publishing some of the ERFŐs implementing rules. 
Komisija priznava, da so bila nekatera pravila uporabe ESB objavljena z znatno zamudo.
The implementing rules were presented to, and discussed by, the Committee of Member State representatives well before their adoption. 
Pravila uporabe so bila predstavljena in obravnavana v odboru držav članic že dolgo pred njihovim sprejetjem.
The fund allocation procedure under ERF I was not perfect and some simplifications have already been made. 
Postopek dodelitve sredstev v okviru ESB I ni bil najboljši, nekaj poenostavitev je bilo že uvedenih.
The Commission considers the current procedure is the only way of ensuring ERF funds are deployed as quickly as possible in the Member States on the basis of detailed annual programmes which have been given the CommissionŐs prior approval. 
Komisija meni, da je sedanji postopek edini, ki lahko na osnovi podrobnega letnega programa, ki ga predhodno potrdi Komisija, zagotovi uporabo sredstev ESB v državah članicah v najkrajšem možnem času.
Although it will of course continue its efforts to provide clarification and guidance to the Member States on the ERFŐs rules, the Commission believes that differences in the way Member States implement national projects reflect the fact that projects are tailored to national needs rather than different interpretations of the FundŐs legal basis. 
Komisija si bo še naprej prizadevala države članice iz-obraževati o ESB in jim pojasnjevati njegova pravila, vendar meni, da razlike pri izvajanju nacionalnih ukrepov med državami članicami ne izhajajo iz različnih razlag pravne podlage, temveč so posledica prilagajanja ukrepov nacionalnim potrebam.
The Commission has played an advisory and monitoring role in relation to the Member States even though monitoring was not an obligation laid down in the FundŐs legal basis. 
Komisija je prevzela vlogo svetovanja in spremljanja držav članic, čeprav slednje v pravni podlagi ni predvideno.
Whenever necessary, the Commission takes the across-the-board corrective measures provided for in the FundŐs legal basis. 
Kadar je potrebno, Komisija uvede splošne popravne ukrepe za primere, predvidene v pravni podlagi.
49 and 50. 
49. in 50.
The Commission was late, as it has acknowledged, in publishing the conclusions of the ERF evaluation for the period 2000 to 2004. 
Komisija je sklepne ugotovitve ocene ESB za obdobje 2000–2004 objavila z zaostankom, ki ga je priznala.
Annual evaluations were nevertheless carried out in each Member State. 
Vendar so bile na voljo letne ocene na ravni držav članic.
Despites it small budget the ERF has helped a huge number of persons (600 000). 
Kljub omejenemu proračunu je veliko število ljudi dobilo pomoč iz ESB (600 000 oseb).
In many Member States it has helped to adapt or strengthen asylum legislation and practices. 
Sklad je v več državah članicah omogočil prilagoditev ali zaostritev zakonodaje in praks na področju azila.
The Commission accepts the recommendation for greater harmonisation of statistics. 
Komisija se strinja s priporočilom za bolj usklajene statistične podatke.
It will work out with Member States ways of ensuring more effective validation of data. 
Skupaj z državami članicami si bo prizadevala opredeliti načine za natančnejše preverjanje podatkov.
The Commission considers that a slight risk of poor quality data has to be accepted in view of the nature of the information gathered. 
Komisija meni, da je treba zaradi same narave zbranih podatkov sprejeti tveganje, da bo pri majhnem delu podatkov kakovost nižja.
The Regulation proposed by the Commission in September 2005 on asylum and immigration statistics should overcome this problem once it starts to have an impact on the gathering of asylum data and the Commission and Member States will have to work together more closely. 
Uredba o statistikah na področju azila in priseljevanja, ki jo je Komisija predlagala septembra 2005, bi morala omogočiti rešitev tega vprašanja, takoj ko bi začela vplivati na zbiranje statističnih podatkov na področju azila, Komisija in države članice pa bodo morale okrepiti medsebojno sodelovanje.
The new ERF (2008 to 2013) will include actions enhancing the capacity to collect, analyse and disseminate statistics. 
Novi ESB (2008–2013) bo vključeval dejavnosti spodbujanja zmogljivosti zbiranja, analiziranja in širjenja statističnih podatkov.
31.7.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/23 52. 
31.7.2007 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 178/23 52.
The Commission accepts the recommendation concerning the need to make use of the revised statistics but considers it already takes account of ex post revisions of data for previous years by using the most up-to-date data for the previous three years to allocate funds for a reference year. 
Komisija se strinja s priporočilom o tem, da je treba uporabljati pregledane statistične podatke, toda meni, da z uporabo najnovejših podatkov zadnjih treh let za dodelitev sredstev za referenčno leto že upošteva naknadne preglede podatkov prejšnjih let.
This procedure is compatible with the FundŐs legal basis and the annual nature of the Community budget. 
Ta postopek je v skladu s pravno podlago in načelom enoletnosti proračuna Skupnosti.
The current statistical approach used as a basis for the allocation of funds is the result of detailed and difficult discussions with the Council during the negotiation of the FundŐs legal basis. 
Sedanji pristop v zvezi s statističnimi podatki, uporabljenimi za dodelitev sredstev, je rezultat poglobljenih in težavnih razprav s Svetom v okviru pogajanj o pravni podlagi.
The allocation of fixed amounts has already been used on occasion (minimum threshold by Member State), but the Commission does not believe it can go further in this direction or that funds can be allocated totally on a fixed amount basis without calling into question the ERFŐs fundamental objective which is to spread the burden of managing refugees and displaced persons within the European Union. 
Pavšalna dodelitev sredstev (spodnji prag za države članice) se že delno uporablja. Komisija meni, da ni v njeni moči, da bi v zvezi s tem storila še kaj, in da sredstva ne morejo biti v celoti dodeljena na osnovi pavšala, ne da bi pod vprašaj postavili temeljni cilj ESB, tj. razporeditev bremena beguncev in razseljenih oseb na vso Unijo.
The Commission accepts the recommendation that discussions be initiated with the Council and Parliament on the clarity and precision of the eligibility rules. It would, however, point out that there was an in-depth discussion of eligible projects and target groups during negotiation of the legal basis for ERF 2008 to 2013. The issue of persons eligible for repatriation will be resolved when the European Return Fund comes into force. 
Komisija se strinja s priporočilom, da bi s Svetom in Parlamentom začeli razpravo o jasnosti in natančnosti pravil o upravičenosti do podpore, ampak poudarja, da je do poglobljene razprave o ukrepih in ciljnih skupinah, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, že prišlo v okviru pogajanj za sprejetje pravne podlage ESB za obdobje 2008–2013. Vprašanje oseb, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za ukrep vračanja, bo rešeno z začetkom veljavnosti Evropskega sklada za vračanje.
SUMMARY ................................................................ 
POVZETEK ................................................................
AUDITSCOPEANDAPPROACH............................................... 
Pomanjkljive strateške smernice povzročajo težave pri izvajanju . . . . . . . . . . . ....
Managementstructuresnotalwaysappropriate ............................ 
Preusmeritev pomoči iz naložbene podpore v vzpostavljanje institucij . . . . . . ....
Limited recipient country responsibilities in the project identification and tendering phases............................................................ 
Učinkovite upravljavske strukture so zagotovile hitro dostavo pomoči, pojavljale pa so se težaveznacionalnimiupravnimizmogljivostmi ...............................
C 285/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.11.2007 CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 
Nedosledenpristopprispremljanjuinocenjevanju .............................
How effective was the CommissionŐs management of the CARDS programme? . . . . . . . How far was the strategic guidance directing the programmes appropriate and coherent?.............................................................. 
V kolikšni meri so bile strateške smernice za vodenje programov primerne in dosledne? .............................................................
How far were the management approaches established and used by the Commission appropriateandefficient? ................................................. To what extent did the projects financed encourage recipient country ownership? . . . . . 
V kolikšni meri je bilo spremljanje in ocenjevanje uspešno pri ugotavljanju pomanjkljivosti in širjenju informacij ter ali je Komisija sprejela pravočasne nadaljnje ukrepe? . . . .
Paragraph Page 61-70 15 61 15 62-64 15 65-67 15 68-69 16 70 16 TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 19 
Odstavek Stran 61–70 15 61 15 62–64 15 65–67 15 68–69 16 70 16 OdgovoriKomisije .................................................................... 19
27.11.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/3 ADF BiH CARDS CFCU CSP DG ELARG DG RELEX EAR EC ECPA EU EURALIUS FRY FYROM HQ IPA KFOR MIP OSCE OVI ROM SAI SAp SR UN UNMIK WB ABBREVIATIONS Albanian Development Fund Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation Central Finance and Contracting Unit Country Strategy Paper Directorate-General for Enlargement Directorate-General for External Relations European Agency for Reconstruction European Commission EC Police Assistance mission in Albania European Union European Assistance Mission to the Albanian Justice System Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Headquarter Instrument for Pre-Accession NATO led Kosovo Force Multiannual Indicative Programme Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Objectively Verifiable Indicators Result Oriented Monitoring Supreme Audit Institution Stabilisation and Association process Special Report of the European Court of Auditors United Nations United Nations Mission in Kosovo World Bank 
27.11.2007 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 285/3 ARS BiH CARDS CFPE GD ELARG GD RELEX EAR ECPA EU EURALIUS ZRJ NJRM IPA KFOR OVSE ROM VRI ZN UNMIK KRATICE Albanski razvojni sklad Bosna in Hercegovina Pomoč Skupnosti za obnovo, razvoj in stabilizacijo Centralna finančna in pogodbena enota Generalni direktorat za širitev Generalni direktorat za zunanje odnose Evropska agencija za obnovo Policijska misija Evropske komisije za pomoč v Albaniji Evropska unija Evropska misija za pomoč albanskemu pravosodnemu sistemu Zvezna republika Jugoslavija Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija Instrument za predpristopno pomoč Sile za Kosovo, ki jih vodi NATO Organizacija za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi Spremljanje, usmerjeno k rezultatom (Result Oriented Monitoring) Vrhovna revizijska institucija Združeni narodi Misija Združenih narodov na Kosovu
C 285/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. The main objectives of the ÔCommunity Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and StabilisationŐ (CARDS) programme are to contribute to the recipientsŐ participation in the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAp) and to increase the responsibility of the western Balkan countries and entities in relation to that process. 
C 285/4 SL Uradni list Evropske unije POVZETEK I. Glavna cilja programa „Pomoč Skupnosti za obnovo, razvoj in stabilizacijo“ (programa CARDS) sta okrepiti sodelovanje prejemnikov v stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenem procesu in povečati odgovornost zahodnobalkanskih držav in subjektov v tem procesu.
CARDS was designed to encourage sustainable and EU compatible reform, consolidate stability and to bring the region closer to the European Union. 
Program CARDS je bil zasnovan za spodbuditev trajnostne in z EU združljive reforme, utrditev stabilnosti in približanje regije Evropski uniji.
For the period of 2000 to 2006 the programme has had a budget allocation of more than 5 000 million euro (see paragraphs 1 to 7). 
Programu so bila za obdobje 2000–2006 dodeljena proračunska sredstva v znesku nad 5 000 milijonov EUR (glej odstavke 1 do 7).
The Court audited the CARDS programme to conclude on the effectiveness of the CommissionŐs management. 
Sodišče je revidiralo program CARDS, da bi ugotovilo, kako uspešna je bila Komisija pri njegovem upravljanju.
This was done by assessing (see paragraph 8): (a) whether the strategic guidance directing the programme was appropriate and coherent; (b) whether the management approaches established and used by the Commission were appropriate and efficient; (c) whether projects financed by the programme encouraged recipient country ownership; and (d) whether monitoring and evaluation were effective in identifying weaknesses and disseminating their findings, and the subsequent action taken by the Commission was timely. 
Pri tem je ocenilo (glej odstavek 8): (a) ali so bile strateške smernice za vodenje programa primerne in dosledne; (b) ali so bili upravljavski pristopi, ki jih je vzpostavila in uporabljala Komisija, primerni in učinkoviti; (c) ali so projekti, ki so se financirali v okviru programa, spodbujali lastništvo držav prejemnic in (d) ali se je s spremljanjem in ocenjevanjem uspešno ugotavljalo pomanjkljivosti in širilo te ugotovitve ter ali so bili nadaljnji ukrepi Komisije pravočasni.
The CommissionŐs strategic guidance was very general. 
Strateške smernice Komisije so bile zelo splošne.
This was adequate for the reconstruction phase but not for the more challenging institution building objectives. 
Bile so ustrezne za fazo obnove, za zahtevnejše cilje v zvezi z vzpostavljanjem institucij pa ne.
The country strategy papers did not provide sufficient orientation, particularly as they were not supported by timely sectoral strategies. 
Državni strateški dokumenti niso zagotovili zadovoljive usmeritve, še zlasti zato, ker jih niso pravočasno podprle sektorske strategije.
The multi-annual indicative programmes did not prioritise between or within the different areas of intervention. 
V večletnih indikativnih programih različna področja ukrepanja niso bila prednostno razvrščena niti niso bile določene prednostne naloge v okviru določenega področja.
The European partnerships introduced in 2004 were not used to improve guidance for selection of actions (see paragraphs 11 to 27). 
Evropska partnerstva, uvedena leta 2004, se niso uporabila za izboljšanje smernic za izbor ukrepov (glej odstavke 11 do 27).
In the past the EU assistance to the western Balkans suffered from the co-existence of three different legal bases, slow implementation of programmes and excessive centralisation. 
V preteklosti je imela EU pri pomoči zahodnemu Balkanu težave zaradi soobstoja treh različnih pravnih podlag, počasnega izvajanja programov in pretirane centralizacije.
The CARDS Regulation unified the legal bases. 
Uredba CARDS je poenotila pravne podlage.
The Commission was also successful in ensuring that aid was delivered quickly although this was sometimes at the expense of the capacity of the recipient countries to benefit from the aid. 
Komisija je uspešno zagotavljala tudi hitro dostavljanje pomoči, čeprav včasih na račun zmožnosti držav prejemnic za izkoriščanje pomoči.
The Commission used four different management approaches. 
Komisija je uporabljala štiri različne upravljavske pristope.
The two main approaches Ń devolved Delegations and the European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) Ń were mostly effective and appropriate (see paragraphs 28 to 41). 
Glavna pristopa – dekoncentrirane delegacije in Evropska agencija za obnovo (EAR) – sta bila večinoma uspešna in primerna (glej odstavke 28 do 41).
V. While recipient country ownership was considered a priority by the Commission, there was no consistent approach to achieving this aim and the management approaches used did not encourage such ownership (see paragraphs 42 to 54). 
V. Čeprav je Komisija štela lastništvo države prejemnice za prednostno nalogo, pa pri doseganju tega cilja ni imela doslednega pristopa, uporabljeni upravljavski pristopi pa takšnega lastništva niso spodbujali (glej odstavke 42 do 54).
Monitoring and evaluation was good in parts, but inconsistencies exist between the Delegations and the EAR. 
Spremljanje in ocenjevanje sta bila deloma uspešna, vendar obstajajo neskladja med delegacijami in Evropsko agencijo za obnovo.
An absence of adequate project indicators compromised the effectiveness of monitoring (see paragraphs 55 to 60). 
Ker ni bilo na voljo ustreznih projektnih kazalnikov, je bila ogrožena uspešnost spremljanja (glej odstavke 55 do 60).
The Court concludes that the CommissionŐs management of the CARDS programme was largely successful in contributing to stabilisation and reconstruction in the recipient countries. 
Sodišče je prišlo do zaključka, da je Komisija z upravljanjem programa CARDS v glavnem uspešno prispevala k stabilizaciji in obnovi v državah prejemnicah.
However, the aid was less effective in improving administrative capacities, due to an initially low concentration on institution building and insufficient recipient country capacity to absorb the assistance provided (see paragraphs 61 to 70). 
Vendar je bila pri izboljšanju upravnih zmogljivosti pomoč manj uspešna, ker je bila na začetku manj usmerjena v vzpostavljanje institucij in ker države prejemnice niso imele zadostnih sposobnosti za črpanje zagotovljene pomoči (glej odstavke 61 do 70).
The CARDS Regulation came to an end in 2006 and the new Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance came into effect in 2007. 
Uredba CARDS je prenehala veljati leta 2006, leta 2007 pa je začel veljati nov instrument za predpristopno pomoč.
The Court recommends that the Commission: improves its strategic guidance; ensures that implementation speed takes full account of beneficiariesŐ ability to absorb the assistance; establishes an effective strategy for ensuring recipient country ownership; and extends best practice in monitoring and evaluation (see paragraphs 61 to 70). 27.11.2007 
Sodišče Komisiji priporoča, naj: izboljša svoje strateške smernice; zagotovi, da se pri hitrosti izvajanja v celoti upoštevajo sposobnosti prejemnikov za črpanje pomoči; sprejme uspešno strategijo za zagotovitev lastništva držav prejemnic in razširi najboljšo prakso pri spremljanju in ocenjevanju (glej odstavke 61 do 70). 27.11.2007
27.11.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/5 INTRODUCTION 1. 
27.11.2007 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 285/5 UVOD 1.
CARDS is the acronym for ÔCommunity Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and StabilisationŐ. 
CARDS je kratica za „Pomoč Skupnosti za obnovo, razvoj in stabilizacijo“.
The CARDS programme (1) covers the following countries of the western Balkans: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 
V program CARDS (1) so vključene naslednje zahodnobalkanske države: Albanija, Bosna in Hercegovina, Hrvaška, Zvezna republika Jugoslavija (ZRJ) in Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija.
Concerning the assistance to the FRY and its successor the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (2), the CARDS programme was split into three annual programmes: Serbia (3), Kosovo and Montenegro. 
Pri pomoči za ZRJ in njeno naslednico Državno skupnost Srbije in Črne gore(2) je bil program CARDS razdeljen na tri letne programe: za Srbijo (3), Kosovo in Črno goro.
CARDS is part of the European UnionŐs Stabilisation and Association strategy towards the western Balkans, which emerged in response to the wars in former Yugoslavia during the 1990s. 
Program CARDS je sestavni del stabilizacijsko-pridružitvene strategije Evropske unije za zahodni Balkan, ki je nastala kot odziv na vojne v nekdanji Jugoslaviji v 90. letih prejšnjega stoletja.
The Stabilisation and Association strategy marked the end of the military conflict, the start of physical reconstruction and economic re-launch of the countries (i.e. stabilisation) and increasingly closer ties with the European Union (i.e. association). 
Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvena strategija je zaznamovala konec vojaškega spopada, začetek fizične in gospodarske obnove držav (tj. stabilizacijo) in tesnejše povezovanje z Evropsko unijo (tj. pridružitev).
The European Council meeting in June 2000 was explicit that this integration could ultimately mean membership of the European Union. 
Evropski svet je na svojem zasedanju junija 2000 izrecno nakazal, da bi to povezovanje lahko na koncu pomenilo članstvo v Evropski uniji.
The preamble of the CARDS Regulation describes the main objective of the assistance: ÔThe existing Community assistance should be expanded and redirected to adjust it to the European UnionŐs political objectives for the region and, particularly, to contribute to the stabilisation and association process and increase the responsibility of the recipient countries and entities in relation to that processŐ. Also, according to the Regulation the regional dimension of Community assistance should be given special attention. 
V preambuli Uredbe CARDS je opisan glavni cilj pomoči: „Sedanjo pomoč Skupnosti je treba razširiti in preusmeriti, da bo ustrezala političnim ciljem Evropske unije za to regijo in zlasti pospeševala proces stabilizacije in pridruževanja ter okrepila odgovornost držav prejemnic in subjektov v tem procesu.“ V skladu z uredbo je treba posebno pozornost nameniti tudi regionalni razsežnosti pomoči Skupnosti.