natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(16)). of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S (c) The risk analysis carried out by the Member States should take due account of the prescription period and in some cases it may not require that an audit of warehousing is carried out every three years. (d) The Commission will follow up this finding with the Member States concerned. (e) The Commission will follow up the individual cases with the Member States concerned in order to determine whether there are financial consequences. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E (c) Analiza tveganj, ki so jo izvedle države članice, bi morala ustrezno upoštevati zastaralni rok, poleg tega v nekaterih primerih analiza tveganj ni nujno podlaga za revizijo skladiščenja na vsaka tri leta. (d) Komisija bo z zadevnimi državami članicami sprejela nadaljnje ukrepe na podlagi te ugotovitve. (e) Komisija bo z zadevnimi državami članicami spremljala posa­ mezne primere, da bi ugotovila, ali so nastale finančne posledice.
2.21. DG Budget has made the reservation on the reliability of this Member State's clearance and accounting procedures and systems for TOR on the basis of three consecutive Commission inspections and on the findings of the Court. 
2.21 Generalni direktorat za proračun je izrazil pridržek glede zanesljivosti postopkov potrjevanja, računovodskih postopkov in sistemov za tradicionalna lastna sredstva te države članice na podlagi treh zaporednih inšpekcijskih pregledov Komisije in ugotovitev Sodišča.
The Member State submitted a plan of action at the end of November 2011 setting out the corrective measures that will be taken. 
Država članica je ob koncu novembra 2011 predložila akcijski načrt popravnih ukrepov, ki bodo sprejeti.
The plan contains short-term (2012), medium-term (2012-2013) and long-term objectives (2013-2014 and subsequent years). 
Načrt vsebuje kratkoročne (2012), srednjeročne (2012–2013) in dolgoročne cilje (2013–2014 in v letih, ki sledijo).
The Commission is monitoring the implemen­ tation of the plan. 
Komisija spremlja izvajanje načrta.
The first stage consists in carrying out an external audit of the accounting system. 
Prva faza zajema izvedbo zunanje revizije računovodskega sistema.
It can take time for Member States to improve their systems, particularly where disagreements arise or systemic and structured changes are required. 
Države članice morda potrebujejo več časa za izboljšanje svojih sistemov, zlasti tam, kjer se pojavljajo neskladja ali je treba uvesti sistemske in strukturne spremembe.
The Commission services use all the means at their disposal to ensure Member States satisfactorily address findings and, where relevant, require the Member States to recover any tradi­ tional own resources underpaid. 
Službe Komisije uporabljajo vsa razpoložljiva sredstva, da bi zagotovile zadovoljiv odziv držav članic na ugotovitve, poleg tega po potrebi od posamezne države članice zahtevajo, da izterja tradicionalna lastna sredstva, ki niso bila poravnana v celoti.
This may include taking infringement proceedings where there is a clear ongoing transgression of EU customs legislation. 
To lahko vključuje začetek postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev, kadar gre za očitno kršitev carinske zakonodaje EU.
In recent years the Commission has carried out inspections of simplified procedures, custom control strategy and local clearance. 
V zadnjih letih je Komisija pregledala poenostavljene postopke, strategijo carinskega nadzora in postopek hišnega carinjenja.
A thematic report on custom control strategy was provided to the Advisory Committee on own resources in 2011 and the thematic report on local clearance will be presented in 2012. _____________ (12) Spain and France. 
Tematsko poročilo o strategiji carinskega nadzora je bilo leta 2011 predloženo Svetovalnemu odboru za lastna sredstva, leta 2012 pa bo predstavljeno tematsko poročilo o hišnem carinjenju. _____________ (12) Španija in Francija.
(13) Germany and France. 
(13) Nemčija in Francija.
(14) Spain and France. 
(14) Španija in Francija.
(15) Paragraph 2.15: Belgium. 
(15) Odstavek 2.15: Belgija.
(16) See ECA website: http://eca.europa.eu 
(16) Glej spletno stran ERS: http://eca.europa.eu.
The use of reservations is thus part of the internal control process. 
Zato je uporaba pridržkov del postopka notranje kontrole.
However, the Commission and Member States should endeavour to resolve doubtful elements as soon as possible. 2.24. 
Vendar bi si morale Komisija in države članice prizadevati za čimprejšnjo odpravo dvomljivih elementov.
According to the Commission, the net effect was to decrease VAT-based own resources by approximately 88 million euro (17). 
Po mnenju Komisije je bil neto učinek zmanjšanje lastnih sredstev iz naslova DDV za približno 88 milijonov EUR (17).
At the end of the year, a total of 156 reservations were in place (see Table 2.2). 
Na koncu leta je bilo skupno število pridržkov 156 (glej tabelo 2.2).
Of the reservations put in place by the Commission, 51 relate to infringements of VAT legislation. 
Med uvedenimi pridržki se jih 51 nanaša na kršitve zakonodaje o DDV.
These can only be lifted after the infringement procedure has been closed and the effect on the VAT base for the years concerned has been determined. 
Te je mogoče umakniti šele po zaključku postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev in po ugotovitvi učinka na osnovo za DDV za zadevna leta.
2.25. TheCommissioniscontinuingitseffortstoliftlong-outstanding VAT reservations. The Court defines such reser­ vations as relating to a year at least 10 years previously, that is reservations still in place at the end of 2011 concerning 2002 and earlier years. 
Sodišče kot dolgo neod­ pravljene pridržke opredeljuje tiste, ki so bili uvedeni pred najmanj 10 proračunskimi leti, se pravi pridržke, ki konec leta 2011 še vedno veljajo in se nanašajo na leto 2002 in leta pred tem.
There were 15 such reservations at the year end, some dating back to 1995, compared to 16 at the end of 2010 (paragraph 2.23 of the 2010 Annual Report). 
Konec leta je bilo takih pridržkov, med katerimi so bili nekateri uvedeni že leta 1995, 15, konec leta 2010 pa 16 (odstavek 2.23 letnega poročila za leto 2010).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S _____________ (17) The balance of an increase of 8 million euro and a decrease of 96 million euro. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E _____________ (17) Razlika med povečanjem za približno 8 milijonov EUR in zmanj­ šanjem za skoraj 96 milijonov EUR.
EN 2.24. 2.25. There has been an ongoing improvement in the frequency of consultations with Member States plus enhancement of the levels of cooperation between the Commission and Member States which will continue. 
SL 2.24 2.25 Pogostost posvetovanj z državami članicami se ves čas izboljšuje, poleg tega se še naprej krepi raven sodelovanja med Komi­ sijo in državami članicami; to se bo še nadaljevalo.
The proportion of reservations that the Court defines as long-outstanding is continuing to decrease — being now less than 10 % of the total. 
Delež pridržkov, ki jih Sodišče opredeljuje kot dolgo neodpravljene, se še naprej zmanj­ šuje – zdaj znaša manj kot 10 % vseh pridržkov.
Even with enhanced cooperation, there will always be some long-outstanding reservations as some have many ramifi­ cations to explore, including issues of principle, and may entail more than one attempt to reach a solution. 
Kljub okrepljenemu sodelovanju so nekateri dolgo neodpravljeni pridržki neizogibni, saj je v nekaterih primerih treba proučiti številne vidike, vključno z načel­ nimi vprašanji, možnih pa je tudi več poti do rešitve.
The definition of long-outstanding, adopted by the Court, risks over-accentuating the time apparently taken to resolve reservations. 
Pri opredelitvi dolgo neodpravljenih pridržkov, ki jo uporablja Sodišče, obstaja tvega­ nje, da se pretirano osredotoča na čas, ki je očitno potreben za odpravo pridržkov.
Of the new reservations set by the Commission in 2011, 75 % covered 2007 so were according to the Court’s methodology already almost halfway to being long-outstanding. 
Od novih pridržkov, ki jih je Komisija izrazila leta 2011, se jih je 75 % nanašalo na leto 2007, zato so bili v skladu z metodologijo Sodišča skoraj že na pol poti, da bi bili opredeljeni kot dolgo neodpravljeni.
The figures used in this report slightly differ from those the Commission provides in the relevant annex to its annual accounts. 
Številke, navedene v tem poročilu, se nekoliko razlikujejo od tistih, ki jih Komisija navaja v ustrezni prilogi k svojemu zaključnemu računu.
This is because the Court and the Commission use slightly different methods for counting the stock of reservations. 
Do tega je prišlo, ker Sodišče in Komisija uporabljata neko­ liko drugačen način štetja pridržkov.
The Court uses the date of notification and the Commission the date the associated internal administrative procedures are completed. 
Sodišče upošteva datum urad­ nega obvestila, Komisija pa datum, ko se zaključijo ustrezni notranji upravni postopki.
EN C 344/60 Official Journal of the European Union Table 2.2 — VAT reservations as at 31 December 2011 12.11.2012 Member State Reservations outstanding at 31.12.2010 Reservations placed in 2011 Reservations lifted in 2011 Reservations outstanding at 31.12.2011 Earliest year to which reservations apply 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 6 8 9 4 13 9 2 3 8 1 5 0 6 9 1 0 10 10 2 7 5 7 0 0 7 1 2 0 3 6 1 0 7 8 2 3 7 6 0 2 4 6 0 1 5 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 10 0 0 10 8 6 5 9 6 0 0 6 6 0 1 5 14 0 9 5 0 5 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 1 10 10 2 1 11 9 0 1 8 152 46 42 156 Belgium 2007 Bulgaria 2007 Czech Republic 2004 Denmark 2005 Germany 2003 Estonia 2004 Ireland 1998 Greece 1999 Spain 2003 France 2001 Italy 1995 Cyprus 2004 Latvia 2004 Lithuania 2005 Luxembourg Hungary 2004 Malta 2004 Netherlands 2004 Austria 2002 Poland 2004 Portugal 2003 Romania 2007 Slovenia Slovakia Finland 1995 Sweden 1995 United Kingdom 1998 TOTAL Source: European Court of Auditors. 
SL C 344/60 Uradni list Evropske unije Tabela 2.2 – Pridržki v zvezi z DDV 31. decembra 2011 12.11.2012 Država članica Neodpravljeni pridržki 31.12.2010 Pridržki, uvedeni leta 2011 Pridržki, umaknjeni leta 2011 Neodpravljeni pridržki 31.12.2011 Prvo leto, za katero velja pridržek 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 6 8 9 4 13 9 2 3 8 1 5 0 6 9 1 0 10 10 2 7 5 7 0 0 7 1 2 0 3 6 1 0 7 8 2 3 7 6 0 2 4 6 0 1 5 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 10 0 0 10 8 6 5 9 6 0 0 6 6 0 1 5 14 0 9 5 0 5 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 1 10 10 2 1 11 9 0 1 8 152 46 42 156 Belgija 2007 Bolgarija 2007 Češka 2004 Danska 2005 Nemčija 2003 Estonija 2004 Irska 1998 Grčija 1999 Španija 2003 Francija 2001 Italija 1995 Ciper 2004 Latvija 2004 Litva 2005 Luksemburg Madžarska 2004 Malta 2004 Nizozemska 2004 Avstrija 2002 Poljska 2004 Portugalska 2003 Romunija 2007 Slovenija Slovaška Finska 1995 Švedska 1995 Združeno kraljestvo 1998 SKUPAJ Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/61 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S GNI-based own resources General and specific reservations 2.26. General reservations (18) existed at the end of 2011 on the GNI data of EU-15 Member States for the period 2002 to 2007, EU-10 Member States for 2004-2007, and Bulgaria and Romania for 2007. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/61 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Lastna sredstva iz naslova BND Splošni in posebni pridržki 2.26 Konec leta 2011 so obstajali splošni pridržki (18) v zvezi s podatki o BND držav članic EU-15 za obdobje 2002–2007, držav članic EU-10 za obdobje 2004–2007 ter za Bolgarijo in Romunijo za leto 2007.
2.27. Atthebeginningof2011,therewerefouropen specific GNP reservations (19) relating to the period 1995 to 2001. 
2.27 Nazačetkuleta2011soveljališeštirjeposebni pridržki (19) za BNP, ki se nanašajo na obdobje od leta 1995 do leta 2001.
The Commission subsequently lifted two reservations concerning the United Kingdom, leaving a balance of two (20) at the end of 2011. 
Komisija je pozneje umaknila dva pridržka za Združeno kraljestvo, tako da sta bila konec leta 2011 v veljavi še dva (20).
Verification of GNI inventories 2.28. BasedonEurostatverificationofGNIinventoriesthe GNI Committee adopted the assessment reports on the EU-25 Member States, in July and October 2011. 
Preverjanje opisov virov in metod ocenjevanja BND 2.28 PotemkojeEurostatpreverilmetodologijeocenjevanja BND, je Odbor BND julija in oktobra 2011 sprejel ocenjevalna poročila za države članice EU-25.
No general reser­ vations were lifted or specific reservations put in place in respect of GNI data for the period 2002 onwards until the end of January 2012 (see paragraphs 2.29 and 2.41, fourth indent, of the 2010 Annual Report). 
Za obdobje od leta 2002 do konca januarja 2012 niso bili umaknjeni nobeni splošni pridržki niti uvedeni nobeni posebni pridržki za podatke o BND (glej odstavek 2.29 in četrto alineo odstavka 2.41 letnega poročila za leto 2010).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 2.26. As the Court acknowledges in paragraph 2.28 the situation had changed markedly by January 2012 when general reservations remained in place only for Bulgaria and Romania. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 2.26 Kot Sodišče priznava v odstavku 2.28, se je položaj opazno spremenil do januarja 2012, ko so splošni pridržki ostali v veljavi samo za Bolgarijo in Romunijo.
2.27. The Commission is making progress via its cooperation with the two countries that still have GNP reservations for the period 1995-2001 (one for Greece and one for the United Kingdom at end 2011) so that these reservations can be lifted. 
2.27 Komisija uspešno sodeluje z obema državama, v zvezi s katerima pridržki za BNP za obdobje 1995–2001 še vedno veljajo (eden za Grčijo in eden za Združeno kraljestvo ob koncu leta 2011), da bi te lahko odpravili.
2.28. As a result of conclusions drawn at the two GNI Committee meetings in the second half of 2011 work continued until the end of the year identifying and precisely framing the specific reservations needed to replace the existing general reservations. 
2.28 Po sprejetju sklepov na dveh zasedanjih Odbora za BND v drugi polovici leta 2011 se je do konca leta nadaljevalo opredelje­ vanje in natančno določanje posebnih pridržkov, s katerimi je bilo treba nadomestiti obstoječe splošne pridržke.
The administrative processes necessary to provide each of the 25 Member States simultaneously with confirmatory official notification of the lifting of the general reservations and the specific reservations set concerning them were completed in early 2012. _____________ (18) Article 10(7) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000, as amended, states that, after 30 September of the fourth year following a given financial year, any changes to GNP/GNI shall no longer be taken into account, except on points notified within this time limit by either the Commission or the Member State. 
Na začetku leta 2012 so bili dokončani upravni postopki, ki jih je bilo treba opraviti, da je vseh 25 držav članic hkrati prejelo potrdilno uradno obvestilo o odpravi splošnih pridržkov in začetku veljavnosti posebnih zadržkov, ki so jih nadomestili. _____________ (18) Člen 10(7) spremenjene Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1150/2000 določa, da po 30. septembru četrtega leta po danem proračunskem letu sprememb BNP/BND ni več mogoče upoštevati, razen pri točkah, ki jih je v roku sporočila Komisija ali država članica.
(19) A specific reservation covers discrete elements of GNI (GNP until 2001, GNI thereafter) such as gross value added of selected activ­ ities, total final consumption expenditure or gross operating surplus and mixed income. 
(19) Posebni pridržek se nanaša na posamezne dele BND (do leta 2001 BNP, potem BND), kot so bruto dodana vrednost izbranih dejav­ nosti, skupni izdatki za končno potrošnjo ali bruto poslovni presežek in raznovrstni dohodek.
(20) These concerned Greece and the United Kingdom and related to methodological and compilation aspects. 
(20) Nanašala sta se na Grčijo in Združeno kraljestvo, in sicer na vidike metodologije in sestavljanja.
At the end of 2011 around 2%(22) of fines pending were not covered either by a provisional payment or by a guarantee after the due date. 
Konec leta 2011 približno 2 % (22) zapadlih kazni ni bilo pokritih z delnim plačilom ali garancijo po datumu zapadlosti.
2.30. The Court examined a sample of 14 of such fines and found that in eight cases the Commission had not used all available means to enforce the recovery. 
2.30 Sodišče je preučilo vzorec 14 takšnih kazni in ugoto­ vilo, da Komisija v osmih primerih ni uporabila vseh sredstev za izterjavo, ki so ji na voljo.
All of these cases concerned debtors which, the Commission claims, were in a precarious financial condition. 
2.31 Vsi ti primeri so se nanašali na dolžnike, za katere Komisija trdi, da so bili v negotovem finančnem položaju.
DG BUDG states in its 2011 Annual Activity Report that it will not seek to enforce recovery if it assesses that the Union's financial interest is best protected by negotiating a payment plan. 
GD BUDG v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2011 navaja, da si ne bo prizadeval za prisilno izterjavo, če bo ocenil, da so finančni interesi Unije bolje zaščiteni s pripravo načrta plačevanja.
1), as last amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 478/2007 (OJ L 111, 28.4.2007, p. 
1), kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št.478/2007 (UL L 111, 28.4.2007, str.
(22) About 240 million out of 13 billion euro. 
(22) Približno 240 milijonov od 13 milijard EUR.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/63 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Minimum credit ratings of financial institutions that issue guarantees 2.32. Under Article 28a of the Financial Regulation (23), the safeguarding of assets is a management objective of the Commission. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/63 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Minimalne bonitetne ocene finančnih institucij, ki dajejo garancije 2.32 Po členu 28a finančne uredbe (23) je varovanje sredstev upravljavski cilj Komisije.
In order to ensure that the guarantees covering fines are safeguarded, the Commission sets minimum credit rating requirements for the financial institutions providing the guarantees. 
Da se zagotovi, da so garancije za kritje kazni zagotovljene, Komisija določi minimalne zahtevane bonitetne ocene za finančne institucije, ki dajejo garancije.
The Court found cases where these requirements were not respected. 2.33. 
Sodišče je odkrilo primere, ko te zahteve niso bile upoštevane.
On 13 May 2011 the Commission made the conditions for such guarantees less stringent to reflect the deteriorating market conditions. 
2.33 Komisijaje13.maja2011zaradiposlabšanjapogojev na trgu ublažila pogoje za takšne garancije.
The Court found examples where even these updated conditions were not respected. 2.34. 
Sodišče je odkrilo primere, ko celo ti posodobljeni pogoji niso bili upoštevani.
In view of the current state of the banking sector, the Commission states in DG BUDG's Annual Activity Report that it is reviewing its risk management policy. 
2.34 Komisija v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih GD BUDG navaja, da glede na trenutne razmere v bančnem sektorju preverja svojo politiko na področju obvladovanja tveganj.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 2.32-2.35. The Commission considers that in a very limited number of cases it was impossible to obtain guarantees respecting the set requirements taking into account the deteriorating financial environment. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 2.32–2.35 Komisija je mnenja, da je bilo zaradi poslabšanja finančnega okolja v zelo omejenem številu primerov nemogoče prido­ biti jamstva v skladu s predpisanimi zahtevami.
2.33-2.34. In view of the current state of the European financial sector, it is inevitable that the Commission reviews on a regular basis its risk management policy concerning the guarantees covering outstanding fines. 
2.33–2.34 Glede na trenutne razmere v evropskem finančnem sektorju je neizbežno, da Komisija v povezavi z jamstvi, s katerimi so zavarovane neporavnane globe, redno pregleduje svojo politiko na področju obvladovanja tveganj.
Indeed, most major banks have now lost their acceptable rating from all three major rating agencies and in a large majority of Member States it is impossible to find a bank with an acceptable rating, which makes it very difficult for a small or medium-sized company, for instance, to obtain such a guarantee. 
Pravzaprav je večina večjih bank že izgubila sprejemljivo bonitetno oceno vseh treh glavnih bonitetnih agencij, poleg tega je v veliki večini držav članic nemogoče najti banko s sprejemljivo bonitetno oceno, kar na primer malim in sred­ njim podjetjem na primer zelo otežuje pridobitev takega jamstva.
Due to market conditions the Commission was obliged to review requirements for the guarantees on 13 May 2011. 
Zaradi razmer na trgu je bila Komisija 13. maja 2011 primorana pregledati zahteve glede jamstev.
In the examples referred to by Court, guarantees concerned respected the risk policy in force, when accepted by Commission. 
V primerih, na katere se sklicuje Sodišče, so bila zadevna jamstva v skladu z veljavno politiko glede tveganj, ko jih je Komisija sprejela.
Guarantors were later downgraded, which in view of the reduced number of banks fulfilling the criteria still on the market, led Commission again to reconsider its risk policy for bank guarantees in June 2012. 
Garantom je bila pozneje znižana bonitetna ocena, kar je v povezavi z zmanjšanim številom bank na trgu, ki še izpolnjujejo merila, privedlo do tega, da je Komisija junija 2012 ponovno razmislila o svoji politiki na področju tveganj v zvezi z bančnimi jamstvi.
While taking into account the evolution of the financial markets, the new decision also ensures a sufficient degree of diversification in the Commission's overall exposure vis-à-vis individual guarantors. 
Ob upoštevanju razvoja na finančnih trgih novi sklep zagotavlja tudi zadostno stopnjo razpršenosti glede na celotno izpostavljenost Komi­ sije v razmerju do posameznih garantov.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions 2.35. Based on its audit work (24), the Court concludes that, for the year ended 31 December 2011, (a) Member States' declarations and payments of TOR; _____________ (23) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA Zaključki 2.35 Sodišče je za proračunsko leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2011, na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela (24) prišlo do zaključka, da: (a) v izjavah držav članic in njihovih plačilih tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev; _____________ (23) Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št.
1), as last amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1081/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 311, 26.11.2010, p. 
1081/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 311, 26.11.2010, str.
(24) For reasons explained in paragraphs 2.13 and 2.14, this conclusion does not provide an assessment of the quality of VAT or GNI data that were received by the Commission from Member States. 
(24) Zaradi razlogov, pojasnjenih v odstavkih 2.13 in 2.14, ta zaključek ne vsebuje ocene kakovosti podatkov o DDV in BND, ki jih je Komisija prejela od držav članic.
EN C 344/64 Official Journal T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S (b) the Commission's calculation of Member States' contributions on the basis of the VAT and GNI data received from Member States; (c) the calculation of the UK correction; and (d) other revenue; were free from material error. 2.36. Basedonitsauditwork,theCourtfoundthatthe examined supervisory and control systems for revenue were effective. 
SL C 344/64 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 12.11.2012 O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E (b) v izračunu prispevkov držav članic, ki ga je Komisija opra­ vila na podlagi podatkov o DDV in BND, ki so jih poslale države članice; (c) v izračunu popravka za ZK in (d) v drugih prihodkih ni bilo pomembnih napak.
However, the Court draws attention to the matters set out below: (a) The Court's audits revealed weaknesses in national customs supervision (paragraph 2.20). 
Ne glede na to Sodišče opozarja na naslednje zadeve: (a) Sodišče je pri svojih revizijah ugotovilo slabosti v carin­ skem nadzoru na ravni držav članic (odstavek 2.20).