natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
59 The Commission points out that the Technical Assistance project accompanying the SBS and supporting the coordination of the Justice Sector reform started on 09 April 2013, therefore half a year prior to the ratification of the financing agreement triggering the official start of the SBS Programme on Justice on 25 September 2013. 
59 Komisija poudarja, da se je projekt tehnične pomoči, ki spremlja sektorsko proračunsko podporo in podpira usklajevanje reforme pravosodnega sektorja, začel 9. aprila 2013, torej pol leta pred ratifikacijo sporazuma o financiranju, ki je 25. septembra 2013 sprožil uradni začetek programa sektorske proračunske podpore za pravosodje.
61 This is an example of flexible adjustment to additional needs arising in the implementation of an SBS programme, even where such support was not explicitly envisaged in the initial project contract. 
61 To je primer prožnega prilagajanja dodatnim potrebam, ki nastanejo pri izvajanju programa sektorske proračunske podpore, tudi če taka podpora ni bila izrecno predvidena v prvotni projektni pogodbi.
Replies of the Commission and the EEAS 48 Conclusions and recommendations 70 The Commission points out that there was progress, albeit partial, in two (water and health) of four audited Budget Support sectors while the other two (Justice and PFPR), more recent programmes remain ongoing and their final results can therefore not be measured yet. 
Odgovori Komisije in ESZD 48 Zaključki in priporočila 70 Komisija poudarja, da je bil dosežen napredek, čeprav delni, v dveh od štirih revidiranih sektorjev proračunske podpore (vodna oskrba in zdravstvo), medtem ko se v drugih dveh sektorjih (pravosodje in reforma politike javnih financ) novejši programi še izvajajo, zato še ni mogoče izmeriti njihovih končnih rezultatov.
The Court rightly points to the good project outputs. 
Sodišče pravilno poudarja, da so izložki projektov dobri.
As opposed to Budget Support, traditional aid projects by construction suffer from reduced ownership which can thus affect sustainability. 
V nasprotju s proračunsko podporo tradicionalni projekti pomoči zaradi svoje strukture povzročijo manjši občutek odgovornosti, kar lahko vpliva na trajnost.
However, the detailed findings from the Court’s sample rather point to partial achievement of sustainability. 
Vendar pa podrobne ugotovitve iz vzorca Sodišča kažejo na delno doseganje trajnosti.
71 The Commission points out that there was progress, albeit partial, in two (water and health) of four audited Budget Support sectors while the other two (Justice and PFPR), more recent programmes remain ongoing and their final results can therefore not be measured yet. 
71 Komisija poudarja, da je bil dosežen napredek, čeprav delni, v dveh od štirih revidiranih sektorjev proračunske podpore (vodna oskrba in zdravstvo), medtem ko se v drugih dveh sektorjih (pravosodje in reforma politike javnih financ) novejši programi še izvajajo, zato še ni mogoče izmeriti njihovih končnih rezultatov.
72 The Commission agrees that the response could have been quicker. 
72 Komisija se strinja, da bi se lahko hitreje odzvala.
The Commission’s response to risk was actually quick taking account of the actual unfolding of events and internal decisions as indicated in the Commission replies to paragraphs 13-28. 
Komisija se je na tveganje dejansko hitro odzvala, če upoštevamo dejanski razvoj dogodkov in notranje odločitve, kot je navedeno v odgovorih Komisije na odstavke 13–28.
73 The Commission emphasises that Budget Support as an aid modality is a comprehensive package of measures including funding, capacity building, policy dialogue and performance indicators. 
73 Komisija poudarja, da je proračunska podpora kot oblika pomoči celovit sveženj ukrepov, vključno s financiranjem, izgradnjo zmogljivosti, političnim dialogom in kazalniki uspešnosti.
The Commission recognises that in one case, in particular, the assessement could have been more stringent but is is not systemic. 
Komisija priznava, da bi bila ocena zlasti v enem primeru lahko strožja, a to ni sistematično.
Those decisions were taken by the Commission under its implementation mandate of external assistance, with political guidance from the EEAS, and endorsed by member states, in full respect of comitology. 
Komisija je te odločitve sprejela v okviru svojega izvajanja nalog zunanje pomoči, s političnim svetovanjem ESZD, potrdile pa so jih države članice ob popolnem spoštovanju komitologije.
Replies of the Commission and the EEAS 49 74 The Commission emphasises the quality of project design, their effectiveness and their outputs. 
Odgovori Komisije in ESZD 49 74 Komisija poudarja kakovost zasnove projektov ter njihovo učinkovitost in izložke.
75 The Commission agrees on the sequencing between technical assistance, twinning projects and Budget Support. 
75 Komisija se strinja, da je treba določiti časovno razporeditev tehnične pomoči, projektov tesnega medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja in proračunske podpore.
However, in the context of the present financial rules, there will always be a lead time between Technical assistance / twinning and budget support operations. 
Vendar pa v okviru obstoječih finančnih pravil vedno preteče nekaj časa med tehnično pomočjo ali dejavnostmi tesnega medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja in proračunske podpore.
Recommendation 2 The Commission accepts the recommendation Recommendation 3 The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 2 Komisija sprejema to priporočilo. Priporočilo 3 Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
Recommendation 4 The Commission accepts the recommendation Recommendation 5 The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 4 Komisija sprejema to priporočilo. Priporočilo 5 Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
Event Date Adoption of APM / Start of audit 24.3.2015 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 15.2.2016 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 19.4.2016 Commission’s (or other auditee’s) official replies received in all languages 25.5.2016 
Dogodek Datum Sprejetje revizijskega memoranduma / začetek revizije 24.3.2015 Osnutek poročila uradno poslan Komisiji (ali drugemu revidirancu) 15.2.2016 Sprejetje končnega poročila po razčiščevalnem postopku 19.4.2016 Prejeti uradni odgovori Komisije (ali drugega revidiranca) v vseh jezikih 25.5.2016
Moldova receives the highest amount of EU aid per inhabitant of all of the EU’s eastern neighbours. 
Moldavija prejema najvišji znesek pomoči EU na prebivalca med vsemi vzhodnimi sosedami EU.
We assessed whether EU aid had contributed effectively to improving the country’s public administration. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali je pomoč EU uspešno prispevala k izboljšanju njene javne uprave.
We concluded that budget support had had a limited effect. 
Zaključilo je, da je imela proračunska podpora omejen učinek.
The Commission could have responded more quickly when risks materialised, and programmes were not sufficiently aligned to Moldovan strategies. 
Komisija bi se lahko hitreje odzvala na uresničitev tveganj, programi pa niso bili dovolj usklajeni z nacionalnimi strategijami.
The Commission did not make full use of its ability to set conditions for disbursement, and additional incentive-based funds were not fully justified. 
Komisija ni v celoti izkoristila možnosti za določitev predpogojev za izplačilo, dodatna sredstva, ki so temeljila na spodbudah, pa niso bila povsem utemeljena.
The projects we assessed were relevant, and had delivered the expected outputs. 
Projekti, ki jih je ocenilo Sodišče, so bili ustrezni in so prinesli pričakovane dosežke.
However, they were not always well coordinated with budget support programmes, and results were not always sustainable. 
Vendar pa niso bili vedno dobro usklajeni s programi sektorske proračunske podpore, rezultati pa niso bili vedno trajnostni.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Vprašanja: eca.europa.eu/sl/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Spletišče: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA Veliko dodatnih informacij o Evropski uniji je na voljo na internetu.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-5012-4 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-5016-2 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-5076-6 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/292235 doi:10.2865/92371 doi:10.2865/71466 QJ-AB-16-014-EN-C QJ-AB-16-014-EN-N QJ-AB-16-014-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2016 Tiskana izdaja PDF EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-5040-7 ISBN 978-92-872-5052-0 ISBN 978-92-872-5071-1 ISSN 1831-094X ISSN 1977-5784 ISSN 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/1646 doi:10.2865/289672 doi:10.2865/94801 QJ-AB-16-014-SL-C QJ-AB-16-014-SL-N QJ-AB-16-014-SL-E © Evropska unija, 2016 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 15 in the African Great Lakes Region? (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) Did the Commission effectively manage the Humanitarian aid provided to populations affected by conflicts 
št. 15 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Ali je Komisija uspešno upravljala humanitarno pomoč prebivalstvu na območju afriških Velikih jezer, ki so ga prizadeli konflikti? (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
This performance audit was produced by Chamber III of the ECA, which is responsible for the audit of the external actions’ spending areas. 
To revizijo smotrnosti poslovanja je opravil revizijski senat III Evropskega računskega sodišča, ki je odgovoren za področja porabe zunanjih ukrepov.
Mr Karel Pinxten, Dean of this Chamber, is the reporting Member. 
Član poročevalec je Karel Pinxten, dekan tega senata.
He was supported in the preparation of the report by the Head of his office, Gerard Madden; Gérald Locatelli and Beatrix Lesiewicz, support and quality control; Myriam Cazzaniga, Head of Task; Kim Hublé, Peter Kovacs, Cyril Messein and Roberto Ruiz Ruiz, auditors. 
Pri pripravi poročila so sodelovali vodja njegovega kabineta Gerard Madden, Gérald Locatelli in Beatrix Lesiewicz, zadolžena za podporo in kontrolo kakovosti, vodja naloge Myriam Cazzaniga ter revizorji Kim Hublé, Peter Kovacs, Cyril Messein in Roberto Ruiz Ruiz.
From left to right: C. Messein, M. Cazzaniga, K. Pinxten, K. Hublé, R. Ruiz Ruiz. 
Od leve proti desni: C. Messein, M. Cazzaniga, K. Pinxten, K. Hublé, R. Ruiz Ruiz.
Contents 03 Paragraph I–IX 1–10 11–12 13–55 13–31 14–17 18–24 25–31 32–44 33–40 41–44 45–55 46–49 50–52 53–55 56–63 Acronyms and abbreviations Executive summary Introduction Audit scope and approach Observations Funding allocated to well established main priorities but insufficient clarity at further prioritisation stage The Commission has properly identified needs for the AGL region The Commission’s response is appropriate Insufficient transparency at the project selection stage Overall, the Commission’s monitoring is appropriate although the information obtained could be better used In most cases, the Commission obtains adequate information on project implementation Follow‐up is insufficient Most of the projects examined delivered satisfactory results Overall outcomes achieved are positive but in some cases, the Commission’s assessment is not clearly justified The Commission was responsive to changes but could better justify time extensions granted There is limited evidence of what is being done to link Relief, Rehabilitation and Development Conclusions and recommendations 
Kazalo 03 Odstavek I–IX 1–10 11–12 13–55 13–31 14–17 18–24 25–31 32–44 33–40 41–44 45–55 46–49 50–52 53–55 56–63 Kratice in okrajšave Povzetek Uvod Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Opažanja Sredstva so se dodelila za ustrezno določene glavne prednostne naloge, vendar je bilo nadaljnje prednostno razvrščanje premalo jasno Komisija je ustrezno ugotovila potrebe na območju afriških Velikih jezer Odziv Komisije je ustrezen Premajhna preglednost v fazi izbora projekta Spremljanje Komisije je na splošno ustrezno, čeprav bi bilo mogoče bolje uporabiti pridobljene informacije Komisija v večini primerov pridobi ustrezne informacije o izvajanju projektov Nadaljnje spremljanje ni zadostno Večina preučenih projektov je dosegla zadovoljive rezultate Splošni doseženi izidi so pozitivni, toda v nekaterih primerih ocena Komisije ni jasno utemeljena Komisija se je odzivala na spremembe, vendar bi lahko bolje upravičila odobrena podaljšanja trajanja O ukrepih za povezovanje pomoči, rehabilitacije in razvoja obstajajo le skromni dokazi Zaključki in priporočila
Contents 04 Annex I Annex II Annex III Annex IV Annex V Annex VI — Map of the African Great Lakes Region — DRC refugees at the beginning of 2016 — Map Burundian refugees at 26 January 2016 — List of projects examined — Interim and final reports examined — Amendments to projects reviewed Reply of the Commission 
Kazalo 04 Priloga I Priloga II Priloga III Priloga IV Priloga V Priloga VI — Zemljevid območja afriških Velikih jezer — Begunci iz DR Kongo v začetku leta 2016 — Zemljevid – begunci iz Burundija 26. januarja 2016 — Seznam preučenih projektov — Preučena vmesna in končna poročila — Spremembe pregledanih projektov Odgovori Komisije
Acronyms and 05 abbreviations AGL: African Great Lakes DG International Cooperation and Development: Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development DG ECHO: Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection DRC: Democratic Republic of the Congo EAR: Emergency Aid Reserve EDF: European Development Fund EEAS: European External Action Service HAP: Humanitarian Action Plan HIP: Humanitarian Implementation Plan IDP: Internally Displaced People IHL: International Humanitarian Law IO: International organisation LRRD: Linking Relief and Rehabilitation with Development NFI: Non Food Items NGO: Non-governmental organisation NIP: National Indicative Programme OCHA: Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN agency) 
Kratice in okrajšave 05 DR Kongo: Demokratična republika Kongo ERS: Evropski razvojni sklad ESZD: Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje GD za mednarodno sodelovanje in razvoj: Generalni direktorat za mednarodno sodelovanje in razvoj GD ECHO: Generalni direktorat za humanitarno pomoč in civilno zaščito MO: mednarodna organizacija NVO: nevladna organizacija OCHA: Urad za usklajevanje humanitarnih dejavnosti (agencija ZN)
Executive summary 06 IThe African Great Lakes area has in recent decades been beset by conflicts, which have resulted in huge population displacements with severe humanitarian consequences. 
Povzetek 06 IObmočje afriških Velikih jezer so v zadnjih desetletjih zajeli konflikti, ki so povzročili veliko razseljevanje prebivalstva z resnimi humanitarnimi posledicami.
The Commission has funded humanitarian projects in this area since 1994, and is continuing with its efforts to tackle the consequences of the conflicts and unrest. 
Komisija od leta 1994 financira humanitarne projekte na tem območju in nadaljuje svoja prizadevanja za odpravo posledic konfliktov in nemirov.
II At present, the area most affected is the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which has about 1.6 million internally displaced people. 
II Trenutno najbolj prizadeto območje je Demokratična republika Kongo, v kateri je približno 1,6 milijona notranje razseljenih oseb.
Currently, there are about 437 000 Congolese refugees in the neighbouring countries, mainly in Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda and Tanzania. 
V sosednjih državah, zlasti v Burundiju, Ruandi, Ugandi in Tanzaniji, je zdaj približno 437 000 kongovskih beguncev.
The unrest in Burundi in 2015 has added about 236 000 to the overall figure for refugees. 
Zaradi nemirov v Burundiju leta 2015 se je skupno število beguncev povečalo še za približno 236 000 ljudi.
In addition to the refugees and the displaced persons, humanitarian aid is also given to the local populations who are caught up in the conflicts or are hosting refugees and displaced persons. 
Poleg beguncev in razseljenih oseb humanitarno pomoč prejema tudi lokalno prebivalstvo, ki se je znašlo sredi konfliktov ali gosti begunce in razseljene osebe.
III This aid consists of the provision of shelter, food, health care and other basic services. 
III Pomoč vključuje zagotavljanje zavetišč, hrane, zdravstvene oskrbe in drugih osnovnih storitev.
To provide this aid the Commission works in close cooperation with international non-governmental organisations, United Nations agencies and other international organisations. 
Da bi jo Komisija zagotovila, tesno sodeluje z mednarodnimi nevladnimi organizacijami (NVO), agencijami Združenih narodov in drugimi mednarodnimi organizacijami.
The amount spent on humanitarian assistance in the African Great Lakes area over the period 2011-2015 was about 300 million euros. 
Za humanitarno pomoč na območju afriških Velikih jezer je bil v obdobju 2011– 2015 porabljen znesek v višini približno 300 milijonov EUR.
IV The auditors conclude that humanitarian aid to the population affected by conflict, in the African Great Lakes area was, generally, managed effectively by the Commission. 
IV Revizorji so prišli do zaključka, da je Komisija na splošno uspešno upravljala humanitarno pomoč prebivalstvu na območju afriških Velikih jezer, ki so ga prizadeli konflikti.
The needs assessment carried out was comprehensive and the flexibility to react quickly to changing circumstances was ensured. 
Opravljena je bila izčrpna ocena potreb in zagotovljena prožnost za hitro odzivanje na spreminjajoče se razmere.
Most of the projects examined were satisfactory in responding to the particular challenges faced. 
Odziv večine preučenih projektov na posebne izzive, ki so se pojavljali, je bil zadovoljiv.
However, a number of weaknesses were identified. 
Kljub temu je bilo opaženih več slabosti.
VThere was a lack of documentary evidence at the stages of determining geographical priorities and assessing project proposals. 
VZa fazi ugotavljanja geografskih prednostnih nalog in ocenjevanja projektnih predlogov ni bilo dokazne dokumentacije.
As a result it was not possible to determine whether the projects chosen complied with the relevant criteria and if the most appropriate projects were selected. 
Zato ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali so izbrani projekti izpolnjevali ustrezna merila in ali so bili izbrani najustreznejši projekti.
When considering the merits of proposals their cost efficiency was not given sufficient attention. 
Pri tehtanju primerjalnih prednosti predlogov je bilo premalo pozornosti namenjene njihovi stroškovni učinkovitosti.
Executive summary 07 VI The monitoring framework was appropriate given the difficult working environment. The reports from the partners were, however, frequently late and this hampered their usefulness. 
Povzetek 07 VI Okvir za spremljanje je bil glede na zahtevnost delovnega okolja ustrezen, vendar pa so partnerji pogosto poročali z zamudo, kar je omejevalo uporabnost poročil.
The expertise of the Commission’s field staff was helpful to the funded partners but reporting from the field visits was not sufficiently comprehensive. 
Strokovno znanje uslužbencev Komisije na terenu je koristilo financiranim partnerjem, toda poročanje o obiskih na terenu ni bilo dovolj izčrpno.
Because of inadequate recording of the follow-up of problems raised, it was not possible to ensure that these were satisfactorily resolved. 
Nadaljnje spremljanje v zvezi z ugotovljenimi problemi ni bilo ustrezno evidentirano, zato ni mogoče zagotoviti, da so bili ti problemi zadovoljivo rešeni.
On a more global level there is no reporting on the Humanitarian Implementation Plan (HIP) to provide an overview of results and lessons learnt. 
Na širši ravni ni poročanja o humanitarnem izvedbenem načrtu, ki bi zagotovilo pregled nad rezultati in pridobljenimi izkušnjami.
VII The results achieved overall for the projects examined were satisfactory. 
VII Na splošno so preučeni projekti dosegli zadovoljive rezultate.
One partner, however, managed to spend most of its budget despite achieving a small percentage of the planned results. 
Toda eden od partnerjev je porabil večino svojih proračunskih sredstev, čeprav je dosegel le majhen delež načrtovanih rezultatov.
In a few cases the justification for time extensions and additional budgets was not apparent. As regards the Commission’s own assessment of results it was unclear, in some cases, from the information available, how they arrived at their conclusions. 
V nekaj primerih ni bilo jasno utemeljeno podaljšanje trajanja projektov in dodatna proračunska sredstva. Pri oceni rezultatov, ki jo je opravila Komisija, včasih iz razpoložljivih informacij ni bilo jasno, kako je prišla do zaključkov.
VIII While the desirability of Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD) has been widely accepted by the Commission and other donors, there are very few examples of this being applied in practice. 
VIII Komisija in drugi donatorji so sicer na široko priznavali, da je zaželeno povezovanje pomoči, obnove in razvoja, vendar je le malo primerov, pri katerih se je to upoštevalo v praksi.
Without very actively pursuing this goal there is a danger that opportunities to move from humanitarian aid to development aid will be missed. 
Brez zelo dejavnega zasledovanja tega cilja obstaja nevarnost, da možnosti za prehod s humanitarne na razvojno pomoč ne bodo izkoriščene.
IX A number of recommendations are made in paragraphs 58 to 63 of the report which are designed to enable the Commission to improve its management of humanitarian aid in the Great Lakes area and beyond. 
IX V odstavkih 58 do 63 poročila je izrečenih več priporočil, katerih namen je omogočiti Komisiji, da izboljša svoje upravljanje humanitarne pomoči na območju Velikih jezer in drugod.
Introduction 08 01 The African Great Lakes (AGL) region comprises the countries of Burundi, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda (see map in Annex I). 
Uvod 08 01 Na območju afriških Velikih jezer ležijo države Burundi, Demokratična republika Kongo (DR Kongo), Kenija, Ruanda, Tanzanija in Uganda (glej zemljevid v Prilogi I).
It has witnessed some of the worst conflicts on the African continent over the last decades. 
Na tem območju v zadnjih desetletjih potekajo nekateri od najhujših konfliktov na afriški celini.
In Eastern Congo, armed groups, including the Congolese Army, continue to commit human rights abuse, exactions, looting accompanied by violence like rape, abduction, and forced recruitment of children. 
V vzhodnem delu DR Kongo oborožene skupine, med njimi tudi kongovska vojska, kršijo človekove pravice, izsiljujejo in ropajo, vse skupaj pa spremlja nasilje, kot so posilstva, ugrabitve in prisilno rekrutiranje otrok.
The resulting humanitarian crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is among the world’s most complex and protracted emergencies in one of the world’s poorest countries1. 
Posledična humanitarna kriza v DR Kongo sodi med najkompleksnejše in najdolgotraj-nejše izredne razmere na svetu, in to v eni od najrevnejših držav sveta1.
At the end of April 2015, presidential elections in Burundi, that took place in July, triggered a spiral of violence and unrest that sent hundreds of thousands on the roads fleeing their country. 
Konec aprila 2015 so predsedniške volitve v Burundiju, ki so potekale julija, povzročile spiralo nasilja in nemirov, zaradi katerih se je na stotisoče ljudi podalo na ceste, da bi pobegnili iz države.
02 Towards the end of 2015, there were about 1.6 million Internally Displaced People (IDPs) in the DRC and more than 437 000 Congolese refugees (see Annex II) in the neighbouring countries, namely in Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda and Tanzania. 
02 Proti koncu leta 2015 je bilo v DR Kongo približno 1,6 milijona notranje razseljenih oseb, v sosednjih državah (v Burundiju, Ruandi, Ugandi in Tanzaniji) pa več kot 437 000 kongovskih beguncev (glej Prilogo II).