natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The added value of this measure in improving the living conditions of the most deprived is better evidenced by the estimates included in box 5 of the Court’s report, according to which the EU scheme provides between 30 and 70 % of the total food distributed in the Community to the most deprived people, depending on the charities and the Member States. 
Dodana vrednost tega ukrepa pri izboljšanju življenjskih pogojev najbolj ogroženih je bolje razvidna iz ocen iz okvira 5 poročila Sodišča, ki navaja, da program EU zagotavlja od 30 do 70 % (odvisno od dobrodelne organizacije in države članice) vseh živil, razdeljenih v Skupnosti najbolj ogroženim.
Nowadays selection criteria and targeting are decided by Member States’ administrations in cooperation with charities, the latter having to respect such criteria to be able to participate in the scheme. 
Merila za izbor in ciljne populacije določijo uprave držav članic v sodelovanju z dobrodelnimi organizacijami, ki morajo spoštovati ta merila, da sploh lahko sodelujejo v programu.
The public consultation on the future of the programme that took place as part of the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation, has revealed a large consensus for not restraining the choice of the population to be helped to certain categories among the most deprived. 
V javnem posvetovanju o prihodnosti programa, ki je potekalo kot del ocene učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, se je izkazalo, da obstaja veliko soglasje, da se populacija, ki je deležna pomoči, ne sme omejevati na določene kategorije med najbolj ogroženimi.
The Commission’s opinion is that, by virtue of the subsidiarity principle, such choice should be left to Member States. 
Komisija meni, da je treba zaradi načela subsidiarnosti to izbiro prepustiti državam članicam.
Following the Court’s examples in Box 5, the EU scheme provides between 30 and 70 % of the total food distributed in the Community to the most deprived people, depending on the charities and the Member States. 
Glede na primere, ki jih Sodišče navaja v okviru 5, program EU zagotavlja od 30 do 70 % (odvisno od dobrodelne organizacije in države članice) vseh živil, ki se razdelijo najbolj ogroženim v Skupnosti.
This is not negligible. 
To ni zanemarljivo.
One of the specific features of this scheme is the essential role played by NGOs and charities through their distribution chains and knowledge of the problems affecting the most deprived population of the Community. 
Ena od posebnosti tega programa je, da imajo poglavitno vlogo nevladne in dobrodelne organizacije s svojimi distribucijskimi veri-gami in poznavanjem problemov, s katerimi se sooča najbolj ogrožena populacija v Skupnosti.
By virtue of the principle of subsidiarity, it is up to Member States’ authorities to determine the appropriate procedures and criteria to designate the organisations taking part in the implementation of annual plans. 
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti so organi držav članic tisti, ki določijo ustrezne postopke in merila za izbiro organizacij, ki sodelujejo pri izvajanju letnih načrtov.
In the same line, the selection of food aid recipients falls under the responsibility of Member States by virtue of the principle of subsidiarity. 
Prav tako je tudi izbira prejemnikov pomoči v hrani v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti v pristojnosti držav članic.
The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation includes a more comprehensive reporting system by Member States to the Commission, the details of which would have to be laid down in the corresponding new implementing rules. 
Predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta vključuje celovitejši sistem poročanja držav članic Komisiji, podrobnosti o njem pa bi morale biti določene v ustreznih novih izvedbenih pravilih.
Differences in the frequency of the reception of the aid are not a proof of a poor impact of the scheme. 
Razlike pri pogostosti prejema pomoči niso dokaz za slab učinek programa.
The food needs of most deprived individuals vary greatly from case to case and over time. 
Potrebe najbolj ogroženih po hrani se zelo razlikujejo od primera do primera in od časa.
In order to be effective, the scheme requires a considerable degree of flexibility so that it can be adjusted to a broad range of circumstances. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Da bi bil učinkovit, mora biti program precej prožen in prilagodljiv zelo različnim okoliščinam. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
Over the years the Commission has adjusted the implementing rules of the scheme in order to soften the criteria on the products to be distributed. 
Komisija je z leti prilagodila izvedbena pravila programa, da je omilila merila glede proizvodov, ki se razdeljujejo.
A comprehensive description of these adjustments can be found in the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation. 
V oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, je obsežen opis teh prilagoditev.
In the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation the range of food that may be distributed is no longer confined to the families of products eligible for intervention. 
V predlogu Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta živila, ki se lahko razdeljujejo, niso več omejena na vrste proizvodov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za intervencijo.
The objective of the measure is not to provide an identical level of aid to all aid recipients as their needs are different too and so are the costs of food across Member States. 
Cilj ukrepa ni zagotoviti enako raven pomoči vsem prejemnikom, saj so različne tudi njihove potrebe, prav tako pa tudi cene hrane v državah članicah.
The absence of uniform quantities distributed per person does not necessarily create a risk of poor impact nor of aid recipients being treated unequally. 
Dejstvo, da količina, ki se dodeli posamezni osebi, ni določena, ne predstavlja nujno nevarnosti, da bo učinek slab ali da prejemniki ne bodo obravnavani enakovredno.
The Commission will do its utmost within the limits due to the nature and the specificities of this measure, to secure that the new implementing rules after the adoption of the new Council Regulation lay down objectives and indicators according to applicable guidelines. 
Komisija si bo v okviru omejitev zaradi narave in posebnosti tega ukrepa prizadevala zagotoviti, da bodo nova izvedbena pravila po sprejetju nove uredbe Sveta določala cilje in kazalnike v skladu z veljavnimi smernicami.
With this purpose, a series of measurable objectives and harmonised, measurable indicators have been proposed in the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation. 
V ta namen je v oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, predlagana vrsta merljivih ciljev in usklajenih merljivih kazalnikov.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 52. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 52.
As foreseen in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 with regard to the allocation of resources to Member States, the Commission duly considers the reports transmitted by Member States as part of the monitoring mechanism and in addition to regular contacts with Member States, in particular within the frame of the Management Committee. 
Kot določa člen 2 Uredbe št. 3149/92 glede dodelitve sredstev državam članicam, Komisija ustrezno upošteva poročila, ki jih posredujejo države članice v okviru mehanizma za spremljanje, poleg rednih stikov z državami članicami, zlasti v okviru upravljalnega odbora.
Moreover, the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation presents various findings based on the study of the national reports, such as for example the number of beneficiaries of the aid. 
Poleg tega je v oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta, predstavljenih več ugotovitev na podlagi študije nacionalnih poročil, na primer število prejemnikov pomoči.
This proves that the Commission analyses and makes use of these reports. 
To dokazuje, da Komisija analizira in uporablja ta poročila.
In application of the subsidiarity principle, it falls on Member States to fix the definition of beneficiaries best suited to the particular situation of its most deprived population. 
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti je v pristojnosti držav članic, da določijo, kateri upravičenci najbolj ustrezajo položaju najbolj ogrožene populacije.
Therefore, the Commission is of the view that common standards or definition of beneficiaries would not bring about any improvement to the efficiency of the programme. 
Zato Komisija meni, da skupni standardi ali opredelitev upravičencev ne bi izboljšali učinkovitosti programa.
In the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation the Commission has expressed its intention to reinforce Member States’ reporting obligations. 
V oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta, je Komisija izrazila svoj namen, da poveča obveznosti držav članic glede poročanja.
Details are to be laid down in the new implementing rules after the adoption of the new Council Regulation. 
Podrobnosti bodo določene v novih izvedbenih pravilih po sprejetju nove uredbe Sveta.
For the 2009 plan the Commission has followed a new method for the calculation of national allocations that takes into account the differences in purchasing power between Member States. 
Komisija je pri načrtu za leto 2009 uporabila novo metodo za izračun nacionalnih prispevkov, ki upošteva razliko v kupni moči med državami članicami.
Details about this calculation are provided in the annex to the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation. 
Podrobnosti o tem izračunu so na voljo v prilogi k oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta.
The Commission takes account of significant under-execution by Member States. 
Komisija upošteva nezadostno izvrševanje s strani držav članic.
The fact that no adjustment was applied during the period under scrutiny (plans 2006–2008) is due to the high level of execution achieved by participant Member States. 
V obdobju, za katero je bil opravljen pregled, zaradi visoke stopnje izvrševanja v sodelujočih državah članicah ni bila uporabljena prilagoditev (načrti za leta 2006–2008).
The Commission stresses that any calculation method has to be based on official statistics available for all Member States. 
Komisija poudarja, da mora metoda izračuna temeljiti na uradnih statističnih podatkih, ki so na voljo za vse države članice.
The definition of national needs is the responsibility of Member States following their own procedures, in particular consulting involved charities. 
Za opredelitev nacionalnih potreb so odgovorne države članice v skladu s svojimi postopki, zlasti v posvetovanju s sodelujočimi dobrodelnimi organizacijami.
In this sense, the Commission has always actively encouraged Member States to involve charities in the inception of the programme. 
V tem smislu je Komisija vedno spodbujala države članice, da dobrodelne organizacije vključijo ob začetku programa.
The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation foresees that Member States co-finance the programme, which will further encourage Member States to secure the necessary matching between requests and effective needs (see Annex 14 to the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal). 
Predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta določa sofinanciranje programa s strani držav članic, kar bo države članice še bolj spodbudilo, da zagotovijo potrebno skladnost med zahtevami in dejanskimi potrebami (glej Prilogo 14 ocene učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije).
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 59. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 59.
While it is correct that Member States needs cannot always be satisfied at 100 % mainly due to the lack of resources, the Commission makes every effort to meet Member States requests in the largest possible manner. 
Čeprav je res, da potrebe držav članic ne morejo biti vedno v celoti izpolnjene, predvsem zaradi pomanjkanja virov, si Komisija prizadeva, da bi v največji možni meri izpolnjevala njihove zahteve.
Member States communicate to the Commission the products they wish to get. 
Države članice Komisiji sporočijo, katere proizvode hočejo.
These initial requests are discussed both in the framework of the Management Committee and in bilateral contacts. 
O teh začetnih zahtevah se posvetuje v okviru upravljalnega odbora in med dvostranskimi stiki.
As a consequence the initial requests are adjusted. 
Posledično se začetne zahteve prilagodijo.
As an example rice and butter were replaced by other products. 
Riž in maslo so na primer nadomestili drugi proizvodi.
However, from this procedure it cannot be concluded that the Member States were allocated products which they did not want. 
Kljub temu iz tega postopka ni mogoče sklepati, da so države članice dobile proizvode, ki jih niso hotele.
Fact is that Member States accepted that their initial request could not be met and that, in exchange, they have received products which they initially did not demand. 
Dejstvo je, da so se države članice sprijaznile s tem, da njihovih začetnih zahtev ni bilo mogoče izpolniti, in so namesto tega prejele proizvode, za katere niso zaprosile na začetku.
Nevertheless, all Member States accepted these decisions and welcomed the products they finally received. 
Kljub temu so se vse države članice strinjale s temi odločitvami in sprejele proizvode, ki so jih na koncu dobile.
EU and national legislation on public procurement apply to the tenders run in the framework of this scheme, without the need of this legislation being explicitly mentioned in Regulations. 
Zakonodaja EU in nacionalna zakonodaja o javnih naročilih se nanašata na javne razpise v okviru tega programa, pri čemer te zakonodaje ni treba navesti v uredbah.
See the Commission reply to paragraph 63. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 63.
The Commission has performed 6 audits between 2006 and 2007 without finding any major shortcoming in the procedures followed by Member States to run the tenders. 
Komisija je v letih 2006 in 2007 opravila šest revizij in ni odkrila nobene večje pomanjkljivosti v postopkih, ki so jih države članice izvajale pri javnih razpisih.
Furthermore, it has found that operators based in a different Member State are granted with supply contracts, which shows that competition between operators from various Member States occurs. 
Poleg tega je ugotovila, da se dobaviteljem, ki imajo sedež v drugi državi članici, dodeljujejo pogodbe o dobavi, kar pomeni, da obstaja konkurenca med dobavitelji iz različnih držav članic.
Overall, the way Member States conduct the tenders has proven in compliance with the requirements laid down in the EU Directive 2004/18/EC. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Na splošno se je način, na katerega države članice izvajajo javne razpise, izkazal za skladnega z zahtevami iz Direktive EU 2004/18/ES. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
One of the objectives of the programme is the disposal of intervention stocks. 
Eden od ciljev programa je odstranitev intervencijskih zalog.
When available they constitute the priority source of supply for the programme. 
Kadar so na voljo, predstavljajo prednostni dobavni vir za program.
Furthermore, the disposal of intervention stocks through this scheme enables the Community to save the storage costs that otherwise would have to be borne by the EU budget. 
Poleg tega odstranitev intervencijskih zalog v okviru tega programa Skupnosti omogoča, da prihrani na stroških skladiščenja, ki bi se sicer krili iz proračuna EU.
See Commission reply to paragraph 64. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 64.
The Commission mainly follows the evolution of market prices for unprocessed agricultural products while the tenders concern food ready for consumption. 
Komisija spremlja predvsem gibanje tržnih cen nepredelanih kmetijskih proizvodov, medtem ko se javni razpisi nanašajo na živila, ki so pripravljena za uporabo.
No operational conclusions can be based on comparisons between both types of prices. 
Iz primerjave med obema tipoma cen ni mogoče izpeljati operativnih zaključkov.
See the Commission reply to paragraph 64. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 64.
Directive 2004/18/EC governing the procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, is in force in all Member States. 
Direktiva 2004/18/ES, ki ureja postopke za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, javna naročila blaga in javna naročila storitev, je v veljavi v vseh državah članicah.
Even when, within a Member State, provisions regulating tendering procedures differ, they remain in conformity with the Directive. 
Tudi če se določbe države članice, ki urejajo postopke javnih naročil, razlikujejo, so še vedno skladne z navedeno direktivo.
Chapter VI of the Directive contains provisions on publicity of the calls. 
Poglavje VI Direktive vsebuje določbe glede objave javnih razpisov.
Calls for tender are required to be published in national Official Journals, as well as in the Official Journal of the European Union. 
Javni razpisi morajo biti objavljeni v nacionalnih uradnih listih in v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
In some Member States visited by the Court, calls for tender are also publicised via Internet. 
V nekaterih državah članicah, ki jih je Sodišče obiskalo, so javni razpisi objavljeni tudi na internetu.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Provisions regarding the delays for submission of offers are laid down in Art. 38 of the Directive and can vary according to the modalities of implementation chosen in Article 36. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Roki za predložitev ponudb so določeni v členu 38 Direktive in se lahko razlikujejo glede na način izvajanja, izbran v členu 36.
The criteria to award contracts are the ones described in Article 53: i.e. the most advantageous offer in terms of quantity offered/ transport cost, or the lower offer in terms of price. 
Merila za oddajo naročil so določena v členu 53, tj. najugodnejša ponudba v smislu ponujene količine / stroškov prevoza ali najnižja ponudba kar zadeva ceno.
The Commission too noted the sometimes low number of participants submitting bids but it found no evidence of a link between the low participation and the way the Directive requirements were implemented. 
Tudi Komisija ugotavlja, da včasih odda ponudbe malo udeležencev, ni pa našla dokaza o povezavi med nizko udeležbo in načinom izvajanja zahtev iz Direktive.
Given the diversity both in terms of quantity and quality of the products to be supplied, it is not possible to compare prices obtained under the calls for tender with market prices. 
Glede na raznolikost proizvodov, ki se dobavijo, kar zadeva količino in kvaliteto, ni mogoče primerjati cen iz javnega razpisa s tržnimi.
Consequently, no conclusion can be drawn on this basis about the ‘quality’ of the offers submitted. 
Zato na tej podlagi niso mogoči sklepi o „kakovosti“ predloženih ponudb.
The Commission audits also found that several companies were awarded contracts over several years but there is no evidence of a link between the low participation and the way the Directive requirements were implemented. 
Komisija je med revizijami tudi ugotovila, da je več družb dobivalo naročila več let zapored, vendar ni dokaza, da obstaja povezava med majhno udeležbo in načinom izvajanja zahtev Direktive.
This additional economic effect should be taken into account. 
Ta dodaten ekonomski učinek je treba upoštevati.
53 (a) Given the basic link of this programme with intervention stocks, bartering was until recently the core of the scheme. (b) Almost all Member States have in place committees to establish bartering references, including those Member States visited by the Court. 
53 (a) Glede na osnovno povezavo tega programa z intervencijskimi zalogami je bila blagovna menjava do nedavnega jedro programa. (b) Skoraj vse države članice imajo odbore za opredelitev referenc v zvezi z blagovno menjavo, tudi tiste, ki jih je obiskalo Sodišče.
While appreciating the Court’s positive assessment of various elements of the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation, the Commission does not wish to pre-empt the outcome of the political discussions currently taking place on this basis. 
Komisija ceni pozitivno oceno Sodišča glede različnih elementov predloga Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, vendar ne želi domnevati o izidu političnih razprav, ki o tem trenutno potekajo.
Further, the Commission would like to stress that the European Parliament’s opinion5 does not call into question the opportunity to continue to finance this measure through CAP expenditure. 
Poleg tega želi Komisija poudariti, da mnenje Evropskega parlamenta5 ne postavlja pod vprašaj priložnosti za nadaljnje financiranje tega ukrepa iz odhodkov skupne kmetijske politike.
As mentioned in paragraph 25 above, intervention stocks for certain products are increasing under current market conditions. 
Kot je navedeno v točki 25, se intervencijske zaloge nekaterih proizvodov v sedanjih tržnih pogojih povečujejo.
The Commission is of the view that participation of Member States should remain voluntary. 
Komisija meni, da bi moralo biti sodelovanje držav članic še vedno na prostovoljni osnovi.
Setting obligations on the origin of the product would not only pose major control difficulties but would impose a huge administrative burden for Member States’ administrations without any improvement of the efficiency of the scheme, rather the contrary. 
Z določitvijo obveznosti glede izvora proizvodov bi zelo otežili nadzor, poleg tega pa bi to pomenilo veliko upravno breme za organe držav članic, pri čemer se učinkovitost programa ne bi povečala, prej nasprotno.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 76. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 76.
The measure has two complementary objectives: market stabilisation and contributing to the well-being of the most deprived. 
Ukrep ima dva cilja, ki se dopolnjujeta: stabilizacijo trga in izboljšanje blaginje najbolj ogroženih.
The evaluation report to which the Court refers was elaborated by independent consultants and its conclusions should be read taking into consideration the Commission’s critical remarks on the quality of the study, in particular with regard to its methodology, the robustness of the analysis and the credibility of the results. 
Poročilo o oceni, na katero se sklicuje Sodišče, so izdelali neodvisni svetovalci, pri razlagi njegovih zaključkov pa je treba upoštevati kritične pripombe Komisije glede kakovosti študije. zlasti kar zadeva metodologijo, zanesljivost analize in verodostojnost rezultatov.
The European Parliament has just released its opinion6 supporting with certain amendments the proposal of the Commission for a new Council Regulation adapting the measure to new prevailing conditions. 
Evropski parlament je pravkar podal mne-nje6, ki z nekaterimi spremembami podpira predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, ki prilagaja ukrep novim pogojem.
Decisions to continue implementing the programme have been taken on the merits of the measure on both its social and market stabilisation dimensions. 
Odločitve o nadaljevanju izvajanja programa so bile sprejete na podlagi dobrih strani ukrepa v smislu socialne dimenzije in dimenzije stabilizacije trga.
6 See footnote 5. 
6 Glej opombo 5.
Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
Although the Commission appreciates the Court’s positive assessment about its proposal for a new Council Regulation, it does not wish to pre-empt the ongoing debate at Council level on the appropriate financing of this measure for the future. 
Komisija ceni pozitivno oceno Sodišče glede njenega predloga za novo uredbo Sveta, vendar ne želi domnevati o razpravah glede ustreznega financiranja tega ukrepa v prihodnje, ki so v teku na ravni Sveta.