natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We found weaknesses in the Commission’s systems and inconsistencies in the assessments of amounts at risk and error rates made by directorates-general. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo slabosti v sistemih Komisije ter nedoslednosti v ocenah zneskov, pri katerih obstaja tveganje, in stopnjah napake, ki jih pripravijo generalni direktorati.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 29 What we recommend We recommend that the Commission: ο along with national authorities and independent auditors, use all the relevant information available to prevent, or detect and correct errors before reimbursement; ο develops an appropriate risk management and control strategy for Horizon 2020, based on its experience under FP7. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 29 Kaj Sodišče priporoča Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija: ο z nacionalnimi organi in neodvisnimi revizorji uporablja vse razpoložljive informacije, da bi preprečila ali odkrila in popravila napake pred povračilom stroškov, ο na podlagi svojih izkušenj s 7. okvirnim programom pripravi ustrezno strategijo za obvladovanje tveganj in nadzor za Obzorje 2020.
This should include adequate checks of high-risk beneficiaries and of costs declared under specific eligibility criteria; and ο ensures that its services adopt consistent approach for the calculation of weighted average error rates and the resulting assessment of amounts at risk. Want to know more? 
Ta naj vključuje ustrezne preglede upravičencev z visokim tveganjem in stroškov, prijavljenih v skladu s posebnimi merili za upravičenost, ter ο zagotovi, da bodo njene službe uporabljale dosleden pristop k izračunu ponderiranih povprečnih stopenj napake ter iz tega izhajajočih ocen zneskov, pri katerih obstaja tveganje. Želite izvedeti več?
Full information on our audit of EU expenditure on competitiveness for growth and jobs can be found in Chapter 5 of the 2014 annual report on the EU budget. 
Vse informacije o naši reviziji odhodkov EU za konkurenčnost za rast in delovna mesta so v poglavju 5 letnega poročila o proračunu EU za leto 2014.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 30 Economic, social and territorial cohesion €55.7 billion What we audited This spending area comprises two parts: regional and urban policy which accounts for 80 %; and employment and social affairs which covers the remaining 20 %: ο The EU’s regional and urban policy is mostly implemented through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF). 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 30 Ekonomska, socialna in teritorialna kohezija 55,7 milijarde EUR Kaj je Sodišče revidiralo To področje porabe ima dva dela: regionalno in mestno politiko, za katerega se porabi 80 %, in zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, za katerega se porabi preostalih 20 %. ο Regionalna in mestna politika EU se večinoma izvaja preko Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) in Kohezijskega sklada.
The ERDF finances infrastructure projects, the creation or preservation of jobs, regional economic development initiatives and activities supporting small and medium enterprises. 
ESRR financira infrastrukturne projekte, ustvarjanje ali ohranjanje delovnih mest, pobude za regionalni gospodarski razvoj ter dejavnosti v podporo malim in srednjim podjetjem.
The CF finances investments in infrastructure in the fields of environment and transport. ο Employment and social affairs policy is mainly financed by the European Social Fund (ESF). 
Kohezijski sklad financira naložbe v infrastrukturo na področju okolja in prometa. ο Zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve se večinoma financirajo iz Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS).
The expenditure in this area covers investments in human capital and support actions aimed at improving the adaptability of workers and enterprises to the changes in working patterns, increasing access to employment, reinforcing the social inclusion of disadvantaged persons and strengthening the capacity and efficiency of administrations and public services. 
Odhodki na tem področju zajemajo naložbe v človeški kapital in podporne ukrepe za izboljšanje prilagodljivosti delavcev in podjetij spremembam v delovnih vzorcih, povečanje dostopa do delovnih mest, krepitev socialnega vključevanja prikrajšanih oseb ter krepitev zmogljivosti in učinkovitosti uprav in javnih storitev.
ERDF, CF and ESF are governed by common rules, subject to exceptions in the specific regulation of each fund. 
Za ESRR, Kohezijski sklad in ESS veljajo enaka pravila, ob upoštevanju izjem, določenih v uredbah za posamezen sklad.
The management of expenditure is shared with Member States and involves the co-financing of projects within approved spending programmes. 
Za odhodke se uporablja deljeno upravljanje z državami članicami, ki vključuje sofinanciranje projektov v okviru odobrenih programov porabe.
Eligibility rules for the reimbursement of costs are set out at national or regional level and may vary from one Member State to another. 
Pravila za upravičenost za povračilo stroškov so določena na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni in se med državami članicami lahko razlikujejo.
Estimated level of error1: Regional and urban policy: Economic, social and territorial cohesion overall: Yes 5.7 % 2 (2013 : 5.9 %) Employment and social affairs: Yes Regional and urban policy: 6.1 % (20132: 7.0 %) Employment and social affairs: 3.7 % (2013: 3.1 %) 1 Equivalent estimated levels of error for 2013 to reflect the new MFF headings. 
Ocenjena stopnja napake1: Regionalna in mestna politika: Ekonomska, socialna in teritorialna kohezija skupaj: Da 5,7 % 2 (leta 2013 : 5,9 %) regionalna in mestna politika: 6,1 % (leta 20132: 7,0 %) zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve: 3,7 % (leta 2013: 3,1 %) 1 Ekvivalentne ocenjene stopnje napake za leto 2013, ki odraža nove razdelke večletnega finančnega okvira.
2 These figures for 2013 are calculated on the basis of the approach for the quantification of public procurement errors applicable at the time of the audit. 
2 Ti podatki za leto 2013 so izračunani na podlagi pristopa h količinskemu opredeljevanju napak pri javnem naročanju, ki se je uporabljal v času revizije.
They do not reflect the impact that the updated approach for the quantification of these errors had on the estimated level of error. 
Ne odražajo učinka posodobljenega pristopa h količinskemu opredeljevanju teh napak na ocenjeno stopnjo napake.
Comprising A closer look at revenue and spending areas 31 The main source of error for the spending on economic, social and territorial cohesion as a whole continues to be infringement of public procurement rules, accounting for nearly half of the estimated level of error. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 31 Glavni viri napak za ekonomsko, socialno in teritorialno kohezijo kot celoto so še vedno kršitve pravil o javnem naročanju, ki pomenijo skoraj polovico ocenjene stopnje napake, sledijo jim vključevanje neupravičenih odhodkov v izjave upravičencev o stroških, kršitve pravil o državni pomoči in, nazadnje, izbira v celoti neupravičenih projektov.
The impact of errors varies between these two spending areas. 
Učinek napak se med tema področjema porabe razlikuje.
Cases of serious failure to comply with public procurement rules that we identified in our audit work include, for example, unjustified direct award of contracts, additional works or services, unlawful exclusion of bidders, as well as cases of conflict of interest and discriminatory selection criteria. 
Primeri resnega neupoštevanja pravil o javnem naročanju, ki jih je Sodišče ugotovilo med revizijskim delom, vključujejo na primer neupravičeno neposredno oddajo naročila, dodatna dela ali storitve, nezakonito izločitev ponudnikov ter primere navzkrižja interesov in diskriminatornih izbirnih meril.
Example: Unjustified direct award of public works In a project in Malta related to the reconstruction and upgrade of a motorway section of a TEN-T road network, the contracting authority negotiated directly a contract with one company without a prior call for competition. 
Primer: Neupravičena neposredna oddaja javnega naročila gradenj Projekt na Malti se je nanašal na obnovo in izboljšavo avtocestnega odseka cestnega omrežja TEN-T. Javni naročnik je brez predhodnega javnega razpisa z nekim podjetjem neposredno izpogajal pogodbo.
This is not in line with EU and national procurement laws and the expenditure declared for this contract is ineligible. 
To ni v skladu s pravili o javnem naročanju na ravni EU in nacionalni ravni, zato so odhodki, prijavljeni za to naročilo, neupravičeni.
Another main cause of error is ineligible expenditure. 
Drug velik vzrok napak so neupravičeni odhodki.
This is due to, for example, expenditure declared outside the eligibility period, overcharged salaries, the declaration of costs not related to the project, non-compliance with national eligibility rules, or revenue that has not been deducted from the declared costs. 
Do tega je prišlo na primer zaradi odhodkov, prijavljenih izven obdobja upravičenosti, prekomerno zaračunanih plač, prijave stroškov, ki niso bili povezani s projektom, neupoštevanja nacionalnih pravil o upravičenosti ali prihodkov, ki niso bili odšteti od prijavljenih stroškov.
Example: Incorrect declaration of salaries In a project in Portugal related to a training programme for young people, the grant agreement provisions on how teachers’ salaries are to be calculated were not complied with by the beneficiary. 
Primer: Nepravilno prijavljanje plač Pri projektu na Portugalskem, ki je obsegal program usposabljanja za mlade, upravičenec ni upošteval določb iz sporazuma o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev o tem, kako se izračunajo plače učiteljev.
In addition, the teachers did not work as many hours as declared. 
Poleg tega so učitelji delali manj ur, kot je bilo prijavljeno.
We also verify whether EU state aid rules have been respected. 
Sodišče preverja tudi, ali se upoštevajo pravila EU o državni pomoči.
Unlawful state aid represents an unfair advantage for the beneficiary entities and thereby distorts the internal market. 
Nezakonita državna pomoč prinaša neupravičeno prednost upravičencem in zato izkrivlja notranji trg.
Errors related to infringement of EU state aid rules accounted for around a fifth of the estimated level of error of spending under this MFF heading. 
Napake v zvezi s kršenjem pravil EU o državni pomoči so pomenile približno petino ocenjene stopnje napake pri porabi za ta razdelek večletnega finančnega okvira.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 32 For a significant proportion of transactions affected by quantifiable errors, authorities in the Member States had sufficient information available to prevent, or detect and correct the errors before claiming reimbursement from the Commission. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 32 Za bistven delež transakcij, na katere so vplivale količinsko opredeljive napake, so imeli organi v državah članicah na voljo dovolj informacij, da bi lahko preprečili ali odkrili in popravili napake, preden so zahtevali povračilo od Komisije.
If all this information had been used to correct errors before declaring the expenditure to the Commission, the estimated level of error for expenditure under economic, social and territorial cohesion would have been 1.6 percentage points lower. 
Če bi vse te informacije uporabili za popravo napak pred prijavo odhodkov Komisiji, bi bila ocenjena stopnja napake za odhodke v okviru ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije za 1,6 odstotne točke nižja.
In addition, we found that for a number of cases, the error that we detected was made by national authorities. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče v mnogih primerih ugotovilo, da so napake, ki jih je odkrilo, naredili nacionalni organi.
These contributed 1.7 percentage points to the estimated level of error. 
Te napake so k ocenjeni stopnji napake prispevale 1,7 odstotne točke.
By the end of 2013, the average disbursement rate to final recipients of financial instruments was 47 %. 
Do konca leta 2013 je povprečna stopnja izplačil končnim upravičencem finančnih instrumentov znašala 47 %.
These funds provide assistance to enterprises or urban projects by way of equity investments, loans or guarantees. 
Ta sredstva pomagajo podjetjem ali projektom urbanega razvoja z vlaganji v lastniški kapital, posojili ali jamstvi.
In total, since 2007, Member States have set up 941 financial instruments with an endowment of around €14.3 billion. 
Od leta 2007 je bilo v državah članicah skupaj ustanovljenih 941 finančnih instrumentov s finančnimi sredstvi v višini okrog 14,3 milijarde EUR.
In April 2015, the Commission extended the eligibility period for these instruments through a Commission decision, instead of asking the Council and the Parliament to amend the deadline specified in the related Council regulation. 
Komisija je aprila 2015 podaljšala obdobje upravičenosti za te instrumente s sklepom Komisije, namesto da bi prosila Svet in Parlament, naj spremenita rok v zadevni uredbi Sveta.
In our view, this way of extending the eligibility period does not respect the hierarchy of the norms. 
Sodišče meni, da pri tem načinu podaljšanja obdobja upravičenosti ni bila upoštevana hierarhija pravnih aktov.
ESF projects whose costs are declared using simplified cost options (lump-sum and flat rate payments and standard scales of unit cost) are less prone to error than those using actual costs. 
Projekti ESS, pri katerih se stroški prijavljajo z uporabo poenostavljenih možnosti obračunavanja stroškov (zbir-na in pavšalna plačila ter standardni stroški na enoto), so manj dovzetni za napake kot tisti, pri katerih se uporabljajo dejanski stroški.
Beneficiaries declare paid expenditure to the national authorities and should be reimbursed ‘as quickly as possible and in full’. 
Upravičenci nacionalnim organom prijavijo plačane odhodke, ki morajo biti povrnjeni „kar se da hitro in v celoti”.
However, we have found that in some cases Member States have built up treasury reserves and beneficiaries were only paid several months after the related statement of expenditure was settled by the Commission, or had not been reimbursed at all at the time of the audit. 
Toda Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so države članice v nekaterih primerih ustvarile državne rezerve, upravičencem pa zneske izplačale šele nekaj mesecev po tem, ko je Komisija poravnala zadevne izjave o odhodkih, ali pa upravičenci v času revizije še niso prejeli povračila.
In general, the Commission’s assessment of error rates reported by audit authorities is largely coherent with the evidence provided by these audit authorities. 
Na splošno je ocena Komisije za stopnje napake, o katerih poročajo revizijski organi, skladna z dokazi, ki so jih zagotovili ti organi.
However, the Commission’s verification of annual control reports can only partly address the risks of under-reporting of errors and over-reporting of financial corrections by national authorities in Member States. 
Toda Komisija lahko s preverjanjem letnih poročil o nadzoru le delno obravnava tveganje, da nacionalni organi držav članic pri poročanju podcenjujejo napake in precenjujejo finančne popravke.
In particular, checks on state aid done by audit authorities were inadequate for nearly a third of the examined operational programmes. 
Predvsem pregledi državne pomoči, ki so jih izvedli revizijski organi, so bili za skoraj tretjino preučenih operativnih programov neustrezni.
In addition to checking the regularity of transactions, we assessed whether and to what extent ERDF, CF and ESF projects that had already been completed by the end of 2014 had achieved their objectives as set out in the grant agreements, and whether these objectives were in line with the objectives specified at programme level. 
Poleg pregleda pravilnosti transakcij je Sodišče ocenilo tudi to, ali in koliko so projekti ESRR, Kohezijskega sklada in ESS, ki so bili do konca leta 2014 že zaključeni, dosegli svoje cilje, kot so bili določeni v sporazumih o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev, ter ali so bili ti cilji skladni s cilji, navedenimi na ravni programa.
We found that three quarters of the projects we examined had fully or partially achieved their objectives. 
Ugotovilo je, da so tri četrtine preučenih projektov v celoti ali deloma dosegle svoje cilje.
Only in three cases were none of the project objectives attained. 
Samo v treh primerih ni bil dosežen noben cilj projekta.
We also identified some cases of projects that had objectives that were not in line with those specified for the operational programme and the priority axis under which the project was funded. 
Ugotovilo je tudi primere projektov s cilji, ki niso bili v skladu s tistimi, ki so navedeni za operativni program in prednostno os, v okviru katere so se projekti financirali.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 33 Finally, our review revealed that performance-based funding arrangements are the exception rather than the rule. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 33 Nazadnje je pregled, ki ga je izvedlo Sodišče, pokazal, da so ureditve za financiranje na podlagi smotrnosti poslovanja prej izjema kot pravilo.
In most cases, failure to achieve project objectives agreed in grant agreements did not impact on the level of EU funding received. 
V večini primerov nedoseganje ciljev projekta iz sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev ni vplivalo na raven prejetega financiranja EU.
What we recommend We recommend that: ο the Commission carries out a focused analysis of the national eligibility rules for 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 programming periods and uses it to provide guidance to Member States on how to simplify and avoid unnecessary complex and/or burdensome rules; ο the Commission further strengthens the control system for audit authorities, ensuring adequate checks of compliance with state aid and public procurement rules and that they provide the specific information on audits of operations. 
Kaj Sodišče priporoča Sodišče priporoča: ο naj Komisija naj izvede osredotočeno analizo nacionalnih pravil o upravičenosti za programski obdobji 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 in jo uporabi za zagotavljanje navodil državam članicam o tem, kako naj poenostavijo in preprečijo nepotrebno zapletena in/ali obremenjujoča pravila, ο naj Komisija dodatno okrepi kontrolni sistem za revizijske organe, da bi zagotovila, da revizijski organi izvajajo ustrezne preglede skladnosti s pravili o državni pomoči in javnem naročanju ter zagotavljajo specifične informacije o revizijah operacij.
The Commission should assess in all Member States the reliability of the financial corrections reported by the certifying authorities; ο the Commission submits a legislative proposal to amend the applicable regulation concerning the extension of the eligibility period for financial instruments under shared management; ο managing authorities and intermediate bodies in Member States intensify their efforts to address weaknesses in ‘first level checks’. 
Komisija naj v vseh državah članicah oceni zanesljivost finančnih popravkov, o katerih so poročali organi za potrjevanje, ο naj Komisija predloži zakonodajni predlog za spremembo veljavne uredbe v zvezi s podaljšanjem obdobja upravičenosti za finančne instrumente, za katere se uporablja deljeno upravljanje, ο naj organi upravljanja in posredniška telesa v državah članicah okrepijo svoja prizadevanja za obravnavo slabosti pri „pregledih na prvi stopnji”.
In addition, the Commission should request audit authorities to include in their systems audits the re-performance of some of these checks; and ο Member States extend the use of the simplified cost options for projects exceeding €50 000 as well as ensure that reimbursement to beneficiaries is done within 90 days after the submission of a correct payment claim by the beneficiary. Want to know more? 
Komisija naj poleg tega od revizijskih organov zahteva, da v svoje revizije sistemov vključijo ponovno izvedbo nekaterih pregledov, in ο naj države članice razširijo uporabo poenostavljenih možnosti obračunavanja stroškov za projekte, katerih vrednost presega 50 000 EUR, in zagotovijo, da se povračila upravičencem izvršijo v 90 dneh po predložitvi pravilnega zahtevka upravičenca za plačilo. Želite izvedeti več?
Full information on our audit of EU expenditure for economic, social and territorial cohesion can be found in Chapter 6 of the 2014 annual report on the EU budget. 
Vse informacije o naši reviziji odhodkov EU za ekonomsko, socialno in teritorialno kohezijo so v poglavju 6 letnega poročila o proračunu EU za leto 2014.
A closer look at revenue and spending areas 34 Natural resources €57.5 billion What we audited This spending area covers the common agricultural policy (CAP), common fisheries policy (CFP) and environmental measures: ο The CAP aims to increase agricultural productivity, ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, stabilise markets, assure the availability of supplies and ensure that supplies reach the consumers at reasonable prices. 
Podrobneje o prihodkih in področjih porabe 34 Naravni viri 57,5 milijarde EUR Kaj je Sodišče revidiralo To področje porabe zajema skupno kmetijsko politiko, skupno ribiško politiko in okoljske ukrepe: ο cilji skupne kmetijske politike so povečati kmetijsko produktivnost, zagotoviti primerno življenjsko raven kmetijske skupnosti, stabilizirati trge, zagotoviti redno preskrbo ter zagotoviti, da je preskrba potrošnikom dostopna po primernih cenah.
It is implemented through two funds: the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) which fully finances EU direct aid and market measures and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) which co-finances rural development programmes together with the Member States. 
Izvaja se preko dveh skladov: Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS), ki v celoti financira neposredno pomoč EU in tržne ukrepe, ter Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), ki skupaj z državami članicami sofinancira programe za razvoj podeželja.
Expenditure under both funds is channelled through some 80 paying agencies that are responsible for checking the eligibility of aid applications and making payments to beneficiaries. ο The CFP pursues similar objectives to those of the CAP and the main tool for implementation is the European Fisheries Fund (EFF). 
Odhodke v okviru obeh skladov izvršuje približno 80 plačilnih agencij, ki so odgovorne za pregledovanje upravičenosti vlog za pomoč in izvrševanje plačil upravičencem, ο skupna ribiška politika ima podobne cilje kot skupna kmetijska politika, glavno orodje za njeno izvajanje pa je Evropski sklad za ribištvo.
The fund is managed by the Commission and the Member States under shared management. ο The EU’s policy on environment aims to contribute to protecting and improving environmental quality, the life of citizens, and the rational utilisation of natural resources. 
Sklad v okviru deljenega upravljanja upravljajo Komisija in države članice, ο namen okoljske politike EU je prispevati k varovanju in izboljševanju kakovosti okolja in življenja njenih državljanov ter k racionalni porabi naravnih virov.
Expenditure in this area is managed centrally by the Commission. 
Odhodke na tem področju centralno upravlja Komisija.
The programme for environment (LIFE) is the most important. 
Najpomembnejši je program za okolje (LIFE), ki sofinancira projekte, povezane z naravo, biotsko raznovrstnostjo, okoljsko politiko in upravljanjem ter informiranjem in komuniciranjem.
What we found Affected by material error? Estimated level of error1: Agriculture — market and direct support: Natural resources overall: Yes 3.6 % (2013: 4.4 %) Agriculture — market and direct support: 2.9 % (2013: 3.6 %) Rural development, environment, climate action and fisheries: 6.2 % (2013: 7.0 %) 1 Equivalent estimated levels of error for 2013 to reflect the new MFF headings. 
Kmetijstvo – tržna in neposredna podpora: Razvoj podeželja, okolje, podnebni ukrepi in ribištvo: 1 Ekvivalentna ocenjena stopnja napake za leto 2013, ki odraža nove razdelke večletnega finančnega okvira. Da 3,6 % (leta 2013: 4,4 %) Ocenjena stopnja napake1: Naravni viri skupaj: Da kmetijstvo – tržna in neposredna podpora: 2,9 % (leta 2013: 3,6 %) razvoj podeželja, okolje, podnebni ukrepi in ribištvo: 6,2 % (leta 2013: 7,0 %) Od tega