natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The MFF MTR (as detailed in the Commission reply to paragraph 28) also explicitly highlights elements that should support further climate mainstreaming in Horizon 2020. 
Vmesni pregled večletnega finančnega okvira (kot je opisano v odgovoru Komisije na odstavek 28) izrecno poudarja tudi elemente, ki bi lahko podprli nadaljnje vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov v program Obzorje 2020.
63 The 2018-2020 strategic programming process is ongoing and identifies climate action as a strong priority. 
63 Postopek strateškega načrtovanja programov za obdobje 2018–2020 je v teku in opredeljuje podnebne ukrepe kot pomembno prednostno nalogo.
Once the strategic programming process has been finalised, more quantitative aspects for 2018-2020 including budget allocation for climate action can be addressed. 
Ko bo postopek strateškega načrtovanja programov dokončan, bo mogoče obravnavati več kvantitativnih vidikov za obdobje 2018–2020, vključno z dodeljevanjem proračunskih sredstev za podnebne ukrepe.
64 The Commission action plan should be complemented with ‘quantifiable targets’. 
64 Akcijski načrt Komisije bi bilo treba dopolniti s „količinsko opredeljivimi cilji“.
However, the best time to set these is when drafting the Work Programmes for 2018-2020 which are not yet completed. 
Vendar bi bil najboljši čas za to pri pripravi delovnih programov za obdobje 2018–2020, ki pa še ni končana.
65 The Commission confirms that no comparable data regarding climate related spending under the previous MFF exist. 
65 Komisija potrjuje, da v prejšnjem večletnem finančnem okviru ni primerljivih podatkov glede porabe v zvezi s podnebjem.
At the same time, the Commission considers that the major increase in climate spending in the Court’s estimates for some programmes (notably those in paragraph 69) broadly confirm the scale of the Commission’s working level estimates from the beginning of the MFF. 
Hkrati Komisija meni, da velik porast porabe za podnebne ukrepe v oceni Sodišča za nekatere programe (zlasti v odstavku 69) na splošno potrjuje obseg ocen Komisije na delovni ravni ob začetku večletnega finančnega okvira.
67 The Commission considers that the primary benefit of climate tracking in the EU budget lies in supporting a climate-friendly design of spending measures across EU programmes. 
67 Komisija meni, da je glavna korist spremljanja odhodkov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, v proračunu EU podpora okolju prijazne zasnove varčevalnih ukrepov v programih EU.
We recognise that the examples highlighted in the section do not provide ground for drawing broader conclusions and can only serve as illustrations. 
Zavedamo se, da primeri iz oddelka ne dajejo podlage za oblikovanje širših sklepov in lahko služijo samo za ponazoritev.
70 The Commission stresses that the aim of its mainstreaming approach is to integrate climate considerations across the EU budget instruments, and that the change in the composition of climate relevant spending mirrors the changes in the spending priorities in individual programmes and the roles of different financing sources available at country level. 
70 Komisija poudarja, da je cilj njenega pristopa k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov v instrumente proračuna EU in da sprememba sestave porabe, povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi, odraža spremembe v prednostnih ciljih glede porabe sredstev v posameznih programih in vlogah različnih virov financiranja, ki so na voljo na nacionalni ravni.
Reply of the Commission 74 71 The variations in climate relevant spending in different country programmes reflect to a great extent the sector priorities of the country, and thus should not be seen as an indication of broader or narrower commitment to climate action. 
Odgovori Komisije 74 71 Razlike glede porabe, povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi, v različnih nacionalnih programih so v veliki meri odraz prednostnih nalog sektorja posamezne države, zato ne bi smele biti obravnavane kot znak večje ali manjše zavezanosti k podnebnim ukrepom.
75 The targeting of research and innovation (R&I) activities on particular sectors or clusters (such as low carbon economy) were expressly not the subject of detailed discussions in programming. 
75 Usmerjanje dejavnosti raziskav in inovacij na določene sektorje ali skupine (kot so nizkoogljično gospodarstvo) izrecno ni bilo predmet poglobljenih razprav pri načrtovanju programov.
Had the Commission intervened to have a stronger climate-related orientation as regards research and innovation in the German and Romania OPs it would have been contrary to the legally established ex ante conditionality on smart specialisation strategies for which a bottom-up process is essential. 
Če bi Komisija ukrepala za močnejšo usmerjenost na podnebno področje v zvezi z raziskavami in inovacijami v operativnih programih v Nemčiji in Romuniji, bi bilo to v nasprotju z zakonsko določeno predhodno pogojnostjo strategij za pametno specializacijo, za katere je proces „od spodaj navzgor“ bistvenega pomena.
The Commission services are observing that sustainable energy and climate are one of the top priories of these strategies. 
Službe Komisije ugotavljajo, da so trajnostna energija in podnebni ukrepi med glavnimi prednostnimi nalogami teh strategij.
76 The Commission notes that the European Social Fund (ESF) programmes can respond to any changes in demand for green skills as and when they emerge. 
76 Komisija ugotavlja, da se lahko programi Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS) odzivajo na vse spremembe povpraševanja po zelenih znanjih spretnostih, kakor in kadar se pojavijo.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 77-79 The Commission notes that while the contribution of all the ESI Funds together to climate action exceeds 25 %, the individual contribution of each of the funds is inevitably set to vary according to how closely its specific primary missions are linked to climate action. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke od 77–79 Komisija ugotavlja, da prispevek vseh skladov ESI za podnebne ukrepe sicer presega 25 %, toda posamični prispevek vsakega sklada se nujno razlikuje glede na to, kako tesno so njegova osnovna poslanstva povezana s podnebnimi ukrepi.
For the ESF, such a contribution can only be indirect, in particular through investments into green skills, which are in turn closely related to labour market developments and hence demand-driven. 
Za ESS je lahko ta prispevek le posreden, zlasti prek naložb v zelena znanja in spretnosti, ki so po drugi strani same tesno povezane z razvojem trgov dela in s tem s povpraševanjem.
The Commission notes that the monitoring system to track the ESF contribution to climate action has been strengthened in the 2014-2020 financial period in particular by including climate action as a ‘secondary theme’ for tracking the ESF contribution. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da se je sistem spremljanja prispevka ESS k podnebnim ukrepom v finančnem obdobju 2014– 2020 okrepil, zlasti z vključevanjem podnebnih ukrepov kot „sekundarne teme“ za spremljanje prispevka ESS.
Notwithstanding, the Commission admits that the ESF contribution to climate action can be better valorised, and will consider options to this end in the future. 
Kljub temu Komisija priznava, da je prispevek ESS k podnebnim ukrepom mogoče bolje vrednotiti in bo proučila možnosti za to v prihodnosti.
81 With the last CAP reform the scope of cross compliance was subject to a considerable review in light of the fact if requirements were controllable, directly addressed to farmers and linked to farming activity. 
81 Z zadnjo reformo SKP je bil obseg navzkrižne skladnosti podrobneje pregledan glede na dejstvo, ali je bilo mogoče zahteve nadzorovati, ali so bile naslovljene neposredno na kmete in ali so bile povezane s kmetijskimi dejavnostmi.
As a result, the list of Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions (GAECs) was shortened by more than 50 % (from 15 to 7) and the statutory management requirements (SMRs) reduced from 18 to 13. 
Zaradi tega se je seznam dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev (GAEC) zmanjšal za več kot 50 % (s 15 na 7), predpisane zahteve ravnanja (PZR) pa z 18 na 13.
Reply of the Commission 75 82 The Commission does not share the view that the greening of direct payments is largely based on the previous GAECs. 
Odgovori Komisije 75 82 Komisija se ne strinja z mnenjem, da neposredna plačila zelene komponente v veliki meri temeljijo na prejšnjih dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih.
The requirements for ecological focus area and crop diversification are new and the protection of permanent pasture has been strongly reinforced with for instance the full protection of environmentally sensitive permanent grassland and a reduced margin of possibility to plough up permanent grassland. 
Zahteve za površine z ekološkim pomenom in diverzifikacijo posevkov so nove, zaščita trajnih travnikov pa je bila močno okrepljena, na primer s popolno zaščito okoljsko občutljivih površin s trajnim travinjem in znižano stopnjo možnosti preoranja trajnega travinja.
The Commission also believes that the greening of direct payments has a significant impact rather than a limited impact. 
Komisija prav tako meni, da imajo neposredna plačila zelene komponente močan učinek, ne le omejenega.
The impact fairly reflects the climate-relatedness of the three farming practices. 
Ta vpliv pravično odraža povezanost treh kmetijskih praks s podnebnimi spremembami.
While indeed the greening requirements do not affect all farmers, the available information also shows that 72 % of the total agricultural area is concerned, which is even more relevant with regard to climate action. 
Zelene zahteve sicer res ne veljajo za vse kmete, toda razpoložljive informacije kažejo tudi, da zadevajo 72 % celotnih kmetijskih površin, kar je še toliko pomembnejše v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi.
84 Climate mainstreaming does not require each region/Member State to step up the investment in climate change mitigation or adaptation. 
84 Vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov ne zahteva, da mora vsaka posamezna regija/država članica okrepiti naložbe v blažitev podnebnih sprememb ali prilagajanje nanje.
Climate action has to be given due consideration in the SWOT analysis and the identification of needs and are evaluated against other priorities. 
Podnebne ukrepe je treba ustrezno upoštevati v analizi SWOT in opredelitvi potreb, ocenjujejo pa se glede na druge prednostne naloge.
The basis of comparison has changed in the two programming periods. 
Osnova za primerjavo se je v teh dveh programskih obdobjih spremenila.
In particular, the effect of the economic crisis has in many areas led to a greater need of enhancing the economic situation in the farming sector which has been affected by the crisis. 
Zlasti učinek gospodarske krize je na številnih področjih povzročil večjo potrebo po izboljšanju gospodarskih razmer v kmetijskem sektorju, ki ga je prizadela kriza.
Against this background, the stabilisation of climate-related expenditure (even if this cannot be precisely quantified due to a lack of appropriate methodologies) is not a negative outcome. 
Zato stabilizacija odhodkov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi (čeprav tega ni mogoče natančno količinsko opredeliti zaradi pomanjkanja ustrezne metodologije), ni negativen izid.
85 The setting of selection criteria is a responsibility of the Member States. 
85 Za določitev meril za izbor so odgovorne države članice.
The Commission provided guidance on the ‘potential for climate action in EAFRD’ which included a recommendation to design selection criteria. 
Komisija je pripravila smernice o „potencialu za podnebne ukrepe v okviru EKSRP“, v katerem je tudi priporočilo za oblikovanje meril za izbor.
89 The objective to adapt fishing capacity to available resources through financial support to fleet management measures was partially achieved in the last programming period. 
89 Cilj za prilagoditev ribolovnih zmogljivosti razpoložljivim virom prek finančne podpore ukrepom za upravljanje ladjevja je bilo delno dosežen v zadnjem programskem obdobju.
This explains the reduced support from the EMFF to fleet measures compared to the previous period under the EFF. 
To pojasnjuje zmanjšano podporo iz ESPR za ukrepe v zvezi s ladjevjem v primerjavi s prejšnjim obdobjem v okviru ESR.
Conclusions and recommendations 91 The Commission stresses that the undertaking to increase climate-related spending to at least 20 % of the EU budget was a political commitment intended to mainstream climate action across EU programmes. 
Sklepne ugotovitve in priporočila 91 Komisija poudarja, da je bila zaveza za povečanje porabe, povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi, na vsaj 20 % proračuna EU, politična zaveza, namenjena za vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov v programe EU.
Reply of the Commission 76 92 The Commission considers that, in general, important progress has been made both in including climate considerations in programme development and in developing the unique quantified mainstreaming approach, which now provides a transparent baseline. 
Odgovori Komisije 76 92 Komisija meni, da je bil na splošno dosežen pomemben napredek tako z vključevanjem podnebnih vprašanj v program razvoja kot tudi z razvojem edinstvenega količinsko opredeljenega pristopa k vključevanju, ki zdaj zagotavlja pregledno osnovo.
The Commission notes, however, that the potential individual contribution of each of the funds is set to vary according to how closely its specific primary missions are linked to climate action. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da se potencialni posamični prispevek vsakega sklada nujno razlikuje glede na to, kako tesno so njegova osnovna poslanstva povezana s podnebnimi ukrepi.
It is, therefore, inevitable that the systems used to programme and to monitor the contribution would differ from one fund to another. 
Zato je neizogibno, da se sistemi, ki se uporabljajo za načrtovanje in spremljanje prispevka, razlikujejo od enega sklada do drugega.
Nevertheless, the Commission considers that it is broadly on track towards the 20 % target, while recognising that further efforts are needed, as outlined in the MFF MTR. 
Kljub temu pa Komisija meni, da je na splošno na dobri poti k uresničitvi cilja 20 %, hkrati pa priznava, da so potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja, kot je predstavljeno v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira.
93 The Commission highlights that the 20 % objective was announced as one element of the mainstreaming approach in the EU budget, with is in itself one element in the EU approach to responding to the investment needs associated with climate change (see Commission reply to paragraph 24). 
93 Komisija poudarja, da je bil cilj 20 % objavljen kot del pristopa k vključevanju v proračun EU, ki je tudi sam element pristopa EU k odzivanju na naložbene potrebe v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 24).
The Commission has assessed progress towards the 20 % target in the MFF MTR, as explained in its reply to paragraph 28. 
Komisija je ocenila napredek pri doseganju cilja 20 % v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira, kot je opisano v njenem odgovoru na odstavek 28.
94 With the programming processes completed, the Commission is now in a position to consolidate the reliable data for updated estimates of these programmes with regard to climate spending, and has published the state of play in the context of the MFF MTR. 
94 Zdaj, ko so programski procesi dokončani, je Komisija v položaju, ko lahko konsolidira zanesljive podatke za posodobljene ocene teh programov v zvezi s porabo za podnebne ukrepe, in je objavila stanje v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira.
This exercise would have been based on inaccurate data and thus could have led to erroneous interpretations, if undertaken on the basis of the 2014-2016 data. 
Če bi bil ta postopek izveden na podlagi podatkov za obdobje 2014–2016, bi temeljil na netočnih podatkih, kar bi lahko privedlo do napačnih razlag.
95 The Commission underlines that the EU method of tracking climate-related spending is pioneering a quantified approach to monitoring budgetary spending. 
95 Komisija poudarja, da je metoda EU za spremljanje porabe v zvezi s podnebjem pionirski količinsko opredeljen pristop k spremljanju proračunske porabe.
As such, there are opportunities for further improvement, while overall the methodology is robust and transparent. 
Zato obstajajo možnosti za dodatne izboljšave, čeprav je metodologija na splošno zanesljiva in pregledna.
Recommendation 1 — Robust multi annual consolidation exercise The Commission accepts the recommendation with regard to carrying out a robust, multi-annual consolidation exercise to identify whether programmed climate expenditure is on track to achieve the 20 % target, and considers it delivered within the context of the MFF MTR. 
Priporočilo 1 – Zanesljiva večletna konsolidacija Komisija sprejema priporočilo glede izvedbe zanesljive večletne konsolidacija za ugotovitev, ali so načrtovani odhodki, povezani s podnebnimi ukrepi, na dobri poti, da dosežejo cilj 20 %, in meni, da je to opravljeno v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira.
The Commission plans to continue monitoring progress annually in the context of preparing annual draft budgets. 
Komisija namerava še naprej letno spremljati napredek v okviru priprave letnih predlogov proračunov.
Reply of the Commission 77 Recommendation 2 — Comprehensive reporting framework (a) The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Odgovori Komisije 77 Priporočilo 2 – Celovit okvir za poročanje (a) Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
It accepts to show relevant aspects of, and progress made on, climate action in the relevant AARs as appropriate. 
Komisija se strinja, da se v zadevnih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih, kjer je to primerno, prikažejo pomembni vidiki in napredek v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi.
The new Annual Management and Performance report (AMPR) summarises (section 1) the EU budget performance based on the latest available evidence on the results achieved with the EU budget. 
Novo letno poročilo o upravljanju in smotrnosti izvrševanja (AMPR) povzema (oddelek 1) smotrnost izvrševanja proračuna EU na podlagi najnovejših razpoložljivih podatkov o rezultatih, doseženih s proračunom EU.
This reporting draws on information from the Annual Activity Reports; the budgetary Programme Statements; and other sources such as evaluation and implementation reports on EU programmes. 
To poročilo izhaja iz informacij iz letnih poročil o dejavnostih, proračunskih poročil o programih in drugih virov, kot so poročila o ocenjevanju in izvajanju programov EU.
The report provides a summary account whereas further detailed reporting on programmes’ objectives and progress on indicators are available in the Annual Activity Reports and Programme Statements. 
Poročilo vsebuje kratek povzetek, medtem ko je podrobnejše poročanje o ciljih in napredku programov glede na kazalnike na voljo v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih in v poročilih o programih.
The Commission does not accept the recommendation to report on financial instruments in the context of tracking budgetary effort towards the 20 % target. (b) The Commission notes that this recommendation is addressed to the Member States. (c) The Commission does not accept the recommendation. 
Komisija ne sprejema priporočila za poročanje o finančnih instrumentih v okviru spremljanja proračunskih prizadevanj za doseganje cilja 20 %. (b) Komisija ugotavlja, da je to priporočilo naslovljeno na države članice. (c) Komisija ne sprejema priporočila.
While committed to improving the granularity of data, the implications of such additional administrative burden imposed on both the Commission and the Member States are unclear. 
Čeprav si komisija prizadeva za večjo razčlenjenost podatkov, so učinki takih dodatnih upravnih obremenitev za Komisijo in države članice nejasni.
The Commission will consider the possibility of differentiating between mitigation and adaptation if the methodology is revised in the future, and highlights that the two are closely interlinked. 
Komisija bo proučila možnost razlikovanja med blažitvijo in prilagajanjem, če se metodologija v prihodnosti spremeni, in poudarja, da sta oba vidika med seboj tesno povezana.
96 The Commission agrees that further efforts are needed to mainstream climate across EU programmes. 
96 Komisija soglaša, da so potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja za vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov v programe EU.
The political objective of 20 % was set to foster mainstreaming (see also Commission reply to paragraph 25). 
Politični cilj 20 % je bil objavljen za spodbujanje vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov (glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 25).
The Commission considers such flexibility in relation to the 20 % target as appropriate in developing an innovative approach to mainstreaming and tracking climate relevant spending. 
Komisija meni, da je takšna prilagodljivost glede cilja 20 % primerna za razvoj inovativnega pristopa k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov in spremljanju porabe, povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi.
The EU mainstreaming approach seeks to integrate climate aspects into all policies and uses the 20 % target to foster mainstreaming. 
EU si pri vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov prizadeva vključiti podnebne vidike v vse politike in uporablja cilj 20 % za spodbujanje vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov.
The Commission has assessed progress towards the 20 % target in the MFF MTR, as explained in the Commission reply to paragraph 28. 
Komisija je ocenila napredek pri doseganju cilja 20 % v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira, kot je opisano v njenem odgovoru na odstavek 28.
Recommendation 3 — Assessment of climate change needs The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 3 – Ocena potreb na področju podnebnih sprememb Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission accepts to consider the climate change needs and the potential to contribute of different areas when proposing a new overall political target. 
Komisija se strinja, da bo preučila potrebe glede podnebnih sprememb in možnost dodajanja različnih področij, ko bo predlagala nov skupni politični cilj.
The Commission does not accept to plan specific contributions for each area or programme. 
Komisija ne sprejema načrtovanja posebnih prispevkov za vsako področje ali program.
Reply of the Commission 78 97 The Commission considers that good progress has been made in climate mainstreaming in the EU budget and that the EU methodology is transparent and fit for purpose. 
Odgovori Komisije 78 97 Komisija meni, da je bil glede vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov v proračun EU dosežen znaten napredek in da je metodologija EU pregledna in ustreza svojemu namenu.
The Commission refers to its reply to paragraph 29 with regard to the nature of the climate spending in various instruments. 
Komisija se sklicuje na svoj odgovor na odstavek 29 glede narave porabe za podnebne ukrepe v različnih instrumentih.
It points out that the legal texts differ in their integration of the political objective of climate mainstreaming which in several cases is introduced as a political ambition in the preamble, not a legally binding target. 
Opozarja, da se pravna besedila razlikujejo glede političnega cilja vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov, ki je v več primerih uveden kot politični cilj v preambuli, ne pa kot pravno zavezujoč cilj.
See also Commission reply to paragraphs 25 and 26. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavka 25 in 26.
98 The EU approach to climate mainstreaming was built on international practices and has developed a quantified tracking methodology that balances the administrative burden and robustness of data. 
98 Pristop EU k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov temelji na mednarodni praksi in je razvil količinsko opredeljeno metodologijo, ki uravnoveša upravno breme in zanesljivost podatkov.
The Commission notes the Court’s calculations based on other methods of climate tracking, but does not consider that these should be given preference over the innovative and detailed mainstreaming approach that has been agreed in the EU. 
Komisija je seznanjena z izračuni Sodišča na podlagi drugih metod za spremljanje odhodkov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, vendar ne meni, da bi bilo treba tem metodam dati prednost pred inovativnim in podrobnim pristopom k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov, ki je bil dogovorjen na ravni EU.