natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
53 The Commission refers to its reply to paragraph 47. 
53 Komisija se sklicuje na odgovor na odstavek 47.
54 The Commission indeed informed France that the quantitative overall targets of the plan are not sufficiently clear and indicated that doubts remain on the qualitative aspects of the offers that Pôle Emploi will propose to the NEETs in order to comply with the YG. 
54 Komisija je dejansko obvestila Francijo, da skupni količinski cilji načrta niso dovolj jasni, in navedla, da še vedno obstajajo dvomi o kvalitativnih vidikih ponudb, ki jih bo Pôle Emploi zaradi uskladitve z jamstvom za mlade predlagal mladim, ki niso zaposleni in se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo.
Further follow up is taking place in the context of the European Semester. 
Nadaljnje spremljanje se izvaja v okviru evropskega semestra.
In its YGIP, Ireland provided a table which sets out information on average participation, inflow of new participants, the expected inflow of young people and the indicative cost of youth provision. 
Irska je v INJM predložila preglednico, ki vsebuje informacije o povprečni udeležbi, dotoku novih udeležencev, pričakovanem dotoku mladih in okvir‐ nih stroških zagotavljanja storitev za mlade.
Irish authorities are reticent to project future participa‐ tion numbers until national budget allocations are decided and therefore did not provide any figures beyond 2014. 
Irski organi so zadržani pri napovedovanju prihodnje udeležbe, dokler ne bodo sprejete dodelitve naci‐ onalnih proračunskih sredstev, zato niso predložili nobenih številk za obdobje po letu 2014.
It was therefore not deemed neces‐ sary or appropriate to request further information from the Irish authorities. 
Zato se ni zdelo potrebno ali primerno od irskih organov zahtevati dodatnih informacij.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 55 and 56 The Commission considered that it was primarily important to be able to see if (sufficient) national resources were allocated in addition to the EU funds. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 55 in 56. Komisiji se je zdelo zlasti pomembno, da se lahko ugotovi, ali so poleg sredstev EU dodeljena (zadostna) nacionalna sredstva.
It therefore provided the Member States with a template where they were asked to pro‐ vide information on the available funding sources, i.e. whether it would originate from EU, national, regional/local, employer and/or other funding sources. 
Zato je državam čla‐ nicam zagotovila predlogo, v kateri naj bi navedle informacije o razpoložljivih virih financiranja, tj. ali bi sredstva pridobile od EU, iz nacionalnih, regional‐ nih/lokalnih virov, od delodajalcev in/ali iz drugih virov financiranja.
The breakdown between the different EU funds was secondary at that stage, since the operational pro‐ grammes were to follow shortly. 
V tej fazi je bila razčlenitev na različna sredstva EU drugotnega pomena, saj naj bi kmalu sledili opera‐ tivni programi.
The Commission considered that a detailed breakdown of EU funding sources by ESF/YEI funds would be provided within the relevant OPs, especially as the informal negotia‐ tions on the OP financial plans were still ongoing between the Member States and the Commission. 
Komisija je menila, da bo podrobna razčlenitev virov financiranja EU na sredstva ESS/ PZM zagotovljena v okviru ustreznih operativnih programov, zlasti ker so med državami članicami in Komisijo še vedno potekala neformalna pogajanja o finančnih načrtih za operativne programe.
However, the Commission agrees that an effective implementation of Youth Guarantee schemes is crucial. 
Komisija se strinja, da je kakovost ključni element izvajanja jamstva za mlade.
As said (cf. common reply to paragraphs 61 and 62) the Commission will further stimulate the reflection around ‘good quality’ offers. 
63 Komisija se sklicuje na skupni odgovor na odstavka 61 in 62.
The Commission has regular exchanges with the European Parliament on the European Semester developments. 
Odgovori Komisije 44 Z Evropskim parlamentom si redno izmenjuje infor‐ macije o poteku evropskega semestra.
Moreover, further to the 27–28 June 2013 European Council conclusions, the Commission will report to the European Parliament and the Council in 2016 on the implementation of the Youth Guarantee and on the operation of the YEI. 
Poleg tega bo v skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta z dne 27. in 28. junija 2013 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v letu 2016 poročala o izvajanju jamstva za mlade in delovanju PZM.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 69 and 70 The Commission notes that a second review of pro‐ gress on the implementation of Youth Guarantee schemes in 21 Member States took place in EMCO on 3 December 2014 with conclusions for each reviewed Member State. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 69 in 70 Komisija poudarja, da je Odbor za zaposlovanje 3. decembra 2014 opravil drugi pregled napredka pri izvajanju programov jamstva za mlade v 21 državah članicah in sprejel sklepe za vsako pregledano državo članico.
These will be followed up in May 2015. 
Maja 2015 bo sledilo nadaljnje preverjanje.
All December 2014 EMCO reviews focused extensively on the Youth Guarantee schemes in a consistent manner, according to Work‐ ing Methods applied to all Member States. 
Odbor za zaposlovanje je decembra 2014 preglede osredotočil predvsem na programe jamstva za mlade in jih dosledno izvajal v skladu z delovnimi metodami, ki so se uporabljale za vse države članice.
Both the May and December 2014 reviews were echoed in the following EPSCO meetings on Youth unemploy‐ ment and the Youth Guarantee. 
O pregledih, opravljenih maja in decembra 2014, se je razpravljalo na naslednjih sestankih sveta EPSCO o brezposelnosti mladih in jamstvu za mlade.
71 The Indicator Framework for Monitoring the Youth Guarantee was endorsed by EMCO on 22 Septem‐ ber 2014. 
71 Odbor za zaposlovanje je 22. septembra 2014 potrdil okvir kazalnikov za spremljanje jamstva za mlade.
The EPSCO Council endorsed in Decem‐ ber 2014 the EMCO Key messages on the Indicator Framework for Monitoring the Youth Guarantee which ask for a strong political commitment to overcome the existing obstacles in data collection and ensure a sound monitoring system of the Youth Guarantee at EU and Member State level, based on the proposed framework. 
Svet EPSCO je decembra 2014 potrdil ključna sporočila Odbora za zaposlovanje o okviru kazalni‐ kov za spremljanje jamstva za mlade, v katerih poziva k močni politični zavezanosti za premagovanje obstoječih ovir pri zbiranju podatkov in zagotavlja trden sistem spremljanja jamstva za mlade na ravni EU in držav članic, ki temelji na predlaganem okviru.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 65. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 65.
Reply of the Commission 45 72 The Commission agrees that the continued com‐ mitment of Member States is needed. 
Odgovori Komisije 45 72 Komisija se strinja, da je potrebna stalna zaveza‐ nost držav članic.
The aim was to test the methodology proposed for the regular administrative data collection for monitoring the implementation of the Youth Guarantee and assess the obstacles faced by Member States and how they can be overcome in view of launching regular data collection in June 2015. 
Cilj je bil preskusiti predlagano metodolo‐ gijo za redno zbiranje upravnih podatkov za spre‐ mljanje izvajanja jamstva za mlade in oceniti ovire, s katerimi se srečujejo države članice, ter ugotoviti, kako jih je mogoče premagati, glede na to, da se junija 2015 začenja redno zbiranje podatkov.
By 18 February all Member States but three have sent their contributions. 
Do 18. februarja so poslale prispevke vse države članice razen treh.
The remaining contributions are expected soon. 
Pričakuje se, da bodo kmalu prispeli tudi preostali prispevki.
73 The reading of the scoreboard of key employment and social indicators is supplemented by the addi‐ tional information derived from — inter alia — the Employment Performance Monitor (EPM), and the assessment of policy measures undertaken by the Member States. 
73 Proučitev pregleda stanja ključnih zaposlitvenih in socialnih kazalnikov je dopolnjena z dodatnimi informacijami, pridobljenimi med drugim iz prikaza uspešnosti zaposlovanja (Employment Performance Monitor – EPM), in oceno ukrepov politike, ki so jih sprejele države članice.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 74 to 76 The Commission emphasises that the formulation and adoption of CSR is foremost a political process, where on the basis of country‐specific analysis in the staff working documents, the Commission makes a proposal which is then reviewed through a multilateral surveillance process in Committees, Council Groups and subsequently endorsed by the European Council. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke 74 do 76 Komisija poudarja, da je oblikovanje in sprejetje priporočil za posamezne države predvsem politični proces, pri katerem Komisija na podlagi analiz po posameznih državah v delovnih dokumentih služb Komisije pripravi predlog, ta pa se nato pregleda z večstranskim postopkom nadzora v odborih in skupinah Sveta, nazadnje pa ga potrdi Evropski svet.
The Commission’s proposals for country‐specific recommendations take into account the specifici‐ ties of each country’s situation. 
V predlogih Komisije za priporočila za posamezne države so upoštevane posebnosti razmer v vsaki državi.
Box 7 The Commission considers that recommendations for both Lithuania and Italy took duly into account the specificities of each country’s situation. 
Okvir 7 Komisija meni, da so v priporočilih za Litvo in Italijo ustrezno upoštevane posebnosti razmer v vsaki od teh dveh držav.
77 The Commission notes that on a whole, the Semes‐ ter process is leading, over a medium‐term per‐ spective, to considerable reform efforts in Member States. 
77 Komisija ugotavlja, da na splošno postopek evrop‐ skega semestra srednjeročno v državah članicah spodbuja precejšnja prizadevanja za reforme.
80 The Commission considers that the YGIP submitted by Member States provide already in most cases a useful general overview of all Youth Guarantee measures. 
80 Komisija meni, da INJM, ki so jih predložile države članice, večinoma že zagotavljajo koristen splošni pregled nad vsemi ukrepi v okviru jamstva za mlade.
Moreover, the Commission has set up a monitoring system for the Youth Guarantee. 
Poleg tega je Komisija vzpostavila sistem spremlja‐ nja za jamstvo za mlade.
Structural reforms are monitored through the European Semester, including EMCO. 
Strukturne reforme se spremljajo v okviru evropskega semestra, vključno z Odborom za zaposlovanje.
Measures targeting individu‐ als will be monitored both through the Indicator Framework for Monitoring the Youth Guarantee, and in the case of measures financed from the YEI, through the relevant arrangements that are set out in Article 19 and Annex I and II of the ESF regulation and relevant CPR provisions related to monitoring and evaluation. 
Ukrepi, namenjeni posameznikom, se bodo spremljali prek okvira kazalnikov za spremljanje jamstva za mlade, v pri‐ meru ukrepov, financiranih iz PZM, pa prek ustrez‐ nih ureditev, določenih v členu 19 ter prilogah I in II k uredbi o ESS in ustreznih določbah uredbe CPR v zvezi s spremljanjem in vrednotenjem.
84 The Annex II ESF indicators for YEI have been designed to follow as closely as possible the ESF Annex I common indicators. At the same time, they reflect the specific nature of YEI. 
84 Kazalniki ESS iz Priloge II za PZM so bili oblikovani tako, da so čim bolj skladni s skupnimi kazalniki ESS iz Priloge I. Hkrati se v njih kaže tudi posebna narava PZM.
84 First indent For the purpose of ensuring the quality result in relation to the (YEI) funding provided, the Commis‐ sion is interested in measuring the overall outcomes in relation to the change in the person’s status — namely that from being a NEET at the stage of entering the operation to a potential change after the YEI support. 
84 Prva alinea Za zagotovitev kakovostnih rezultatov v zvezi z zagotovljenim financiranjem (PZM) želi Komisija izmeriti splošne rezultate v zvezi s spremembo statusa osebe – od statusa mladih, ki niso zaposleni, se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo, ko se vključijo v program, do morebitne spremembe po prejemu podpore PZM.
The Youth Guarantee has its own monitoring requirements which will allow tracking the type of offers provided under the Youth Guarantee from 2016 onwards. 
Jamstvo za mlade ima svoje zahteve glede spremlja‐ nja, ki bodo od leta 2016 omogočile sledenje vrstam ponudb, zagotovljenim v okviru jamstva za mlade.
84 Second indent The YEI indicators follow the logic and pattern of the ESF common indicators. 
84 Druga alinea Kazalniki PZM so skladni z logiko in vzorcem skupnih kazalnikov ESS.
Reply of the Commission 46 Subsequent monitoring for former participants in YEI measures places additional burden on the participants and administrative resources. 
Odgovori Komisije 46 Zaradi nadaljnjega spremljanja nekdanjih udele‐ žencev ukrepov PZM se udeležencem in upravnim virom nalaga dodatno breme.
For some of the measures such extensive obligatory monitoring might be seen as costly and excessive. 
Za nekatere ukrepe se lahko tako obsežno obvezno spremljanje šteje za drago in čezmerno.
Effects observed after prolonged time also decrease causality linking observations to the interventions, decreasing the value‐added of these observations. 
Učinki, ugotovljeni po daljšem času, prav tako zmanjšujejo vzročnost, ki povezuje ugotovitve s posredovanji, kar zmanjšuje dodano vrednost teh ugotovitev.
However, Member States can in addition to compul‐ sory monitoring decide to have additional longer term indicators, for example to repeat a survey after 6 months. 
Vendar se lahko države članice odločijo, da imajo poleg obveznega spremljanja dodatne dolgoroč‐ nejše kazalnike, na primer ponovitev raziskave po šestih mesecih.
Also, Member States have an obligation to carry out impact evaluations, which will provide insights on long‐term effects of interventions such as income differentials for subsequent year and similar indicators in addition to the indicators pre‐ sented in Annex II. 
Poleg tega morajo države članice izvajati ocene učinka, zaradi katerih bo mogoče razumeti dolgoročne učinke posredovanj, kot so razlike v dohodkih za naslednje leto in podobni kazalniki, poleg kazalnikov iz Priloge II.
84 Third indent Whenever a Member State has stated in its OP that it plans to extend the target group to below 30 years, the Commission has requested that the Member State includes additional programme‐spe‐ cific indicators to cover the 25–29 group. 
84 Tretja alinea Kadar koli je država članica v operativnem pro‐ gramu navedla, da namerava razširiti ciljno skupino na osebe, stare do 30 let, jo je Komisija pozvala, naj vključi dodatne kazalnike v zvezi s programom, da zajame starostno skupino 25–29 let.
Result indicators are not age specific as such and do not cover any age group such as 15–18, etc. How‐ ever, Member States are asked by the Commission to include programme‐specific output indicators for YEI age group 25–29, if they decide to target them. Such indicators will allow assessing effectiveness of interventions when crossed with YEI Annex II Result indicators. 
Kazalniki rezultatov sami po sebi niso povezani s starostjo in ne zajemajo nobene starostne sku‐ pine, kot so osebe, stare od 15 do 18 let, itd. Vendar je Komisija pozvala države članice, naj vključijo kazalnike rezultatov v zvezi s programom za PZM za starostno skupino 25–29 let, če se odločijo, da bo to njihova ciljna skupina. Taki kazalniki bodo omogo‐ čili ocenjevanje učinkovitosti posredovanj, če se bodo uporabili skupaj s kazalniki rezultatov PZM iz Priloge II.
Conclusions and recommendations 87 See Commission reply to paragraph 37. 
Zaključki in priporočila 87 Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 37.
89 The Commission refers to its reply to paragraph 47. 
89 Komisija se sklicuje na odgovor na odstavek 47.
The Commission notes that the Council recom‐ mendation does not prescribe any precise way in which the Member States will implement the YG (i.e. employment, continued education, apprenticeship or a traineeship) since it will depend on the national situation (i.e. how many NEETs they have, the struc‐ ture of NEETs). 
Ugotavlja, da priporočilo Sveta ne določa natančno, kako bodo države članice izvajale jamstvo za mlade (tj. zaposlovanje, nadaljnje izobraževanje, vajeništvo ali pripravništvo), saj bo to odvisno od nacionalnih razmer (tj. števila mladih, ki niso zaposleni, se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo, in njihove strukture).
The targeting and the design of the precise support influences the costs and benefits and makes it difficult to estimate in advance the costs and benefits of all potential options. 
Ciljno usmerjanje in oblikovanje natančne podpore vpliva na stroške in koristi ter otežuje vnaprejšnje ocenjevanje stroškov in koristi vseh potencialnih možnosti.
The Commission however agrees that there might be a risk that total funding may not be adequate to implement the Youth Guarantee schemes and has encouraged Member States to prioritise youth employment measures in their national budgets. 
Vendar se Komisija strinja, da lahko obstaja tve‐ ganje, da skupno financiranje ne bo zadostno za izvedbo programov jamstva za mlade, in je spodbu‐ dila države članice, naj v državnih proračunih dajo prednost ukrepom za zaposlovanje mladih.
It should also be recalled that EU funds support to the YG goes beyond direct YEI and ESF measures for young persons’ training and employment measures. 
Spomniti je treba tudi, da podpora za jamstvo za mlade iz sredstev EU presega neposredne ukrepe PZM in ESS za ukrepe za usposabljanje in zaposlova‐ nje mladih.
The ESF also supports labour market services mod‐ ernisation, self‐employment, education and social inclusion measures — which partly also support youth employment from a structural reform point of view. 
ESS podpira tudi ukrepe za posodobitev storitev na trgu dela, samozaposlovanje, izobra‐ ževanje in socialno vključenost, ki delno podpi‐ rajo tudi zaposlovanje mladih z vidika strukturne reforme.
Recommendation 1 The Commission notes the recommendation addressed to Member States and would indeed welcome in some cases a better overview of the estimated cost of all planned measures to combat youth unemployment. 
Priporočilo 1 Komisija sprejema v vednost priporočilo, naslov‐ ljeno na države članice, in bi v nekaterih primerih resnično pozdravila boljši pregled nad ocenjenimi stroški vseh načrtovanih ukrepov za boj proti brez‐ poselnosti mladih.
The template produced by the Commission requested Member States to provide information on EU, national, regional/local, employer and other funding sources thus encouraging the Member States to give the complete information on the overall costs and funding of a YG (including funding gaps). 
V predlogi, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, se od držav članic zahteva, naj predložijo informacije o virih financiranja, pridobljenih na ravni EU, nacionalni, regionalni/lokalni ravni, pri delodajalcih in iz drugih virov financiranja, s čimer se jih spodbuja k navedbi popolnih informacij o celotnih stroških in financiranju jamstva za mlade (vključno z vrzelmi v financiranju).
Reply of the Commission 47 90 The Commission considers that a consistent imple‐ mentation of the Youth Guarantee and a ‘one‐size‐ fits‐all’ approach is neither possible nor in line with the Council recommendation, which clearly indi‐ cates that YG schemes should be in accordance with local, regional and national circumstances. 
Odgovori Komisije 47 90 Komisija meni, da dosledno izvajanje jamstva za mlade in pristop „enotnega modela za vse“ nista niti mogoča niti v skladu s priporočilom Sveta, v kate‐ rem je jasno navedeno, da bi morali biti programi jamstva za mlade skladni z lokalnimi, regionalnimi in nacionalnimi razmerami.
The Commission agrees that an effective implemen‐ tation of Youth Guarantee schemes is crucial. 
Komisija se strinja, da je uspešno izvajanje pro‐ gramov jamstva za mlade ključno.
The outcome based approach followed by the Commis‐ sion has precisely many advantages in assessing the effectiveness of the measures within the YG schemes, as it takes into account the diverse labour market situations and the suitability of an offer to the individual. 
Uporablja na rezultatih temelječ pristop, ki ima številne prednosti pri ocenjevanju učinkovitosti ukrepov v okviru pro‐ gramov jamstva za mlade, saj se upoštevajo različne razmere na trgu dela in ustreznost ponudbe za posameznika.
In this regard, the Commission is of the view that, in general, an offer is of good quality if the person who benefits from it achieves sustainable labour market attachment. 
V zvezi s tem Komisija meni, da je ponudba na splošno kakovostna, če oseba, ki ima od nje koristi, doseže trajnostno povezanost s trgom dela.
That is to say, does not return to unemployment or inactivity thereafter; a ‘good quality’ offer can thus be measured by its outcome. 
To pomeni, da se oseba pozneje ne vrne v brezposel‐ nost ali neaktivnost; kakovostna ponudba se torej lahko izmeri glede na rezultat.
The Commission notes that offers of apprentice‐ ships, traineeships and continued education, be they subsidised offers — such as those financed under YEI/ESF programmes or under national pro‐ grammes — or not, are already covered by quality standards. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da so ponudbe za vajeništvo, pripravništvo ali nadaljnje izobraževanje že zajete v standardih kakovosti, ne glede na to, ali so sub‐ vencionirane – kot so ponudbe, financirane v okviru programov PZM/ESS ali nacionalnih programov – ali ne.
In this regard, the Commission promotes a set of qualitative attributes for traineeships (through the Council Recommendation on a Quality Framework for Traineeships) and for apprenticeships (through the European Alliance for Apprenticeships and the related Council Declaration). 
V zvezi s tem spodbuja sklop kvalitativnih značil‐ nosti za pripravništva (na podlagi Priporočila Sveta o okviru za kakovost pripravništev) in vajeništva (prek Evropske koalicije za vajeništva in povezane izjave Sveta).
For jobs, the Com‐ mission monitors the quality of employment in the European Semester, with particular attention being paid to school‐to‐work transitions and issues related to labour market segmentation. 
Kar zadeva delovna mesta, spremlja kakovost zaposlovanja v okviru evropskega seme‐ stra, pri čemer namenja posebno pozornost preho‐ dom iz šolanja v zaposlitev in vprašanjem, poveza‐ nim s segmentacijo trga dela.
Regarding the quality of employment in the open market, the Commission notes that any quality assessment will be dependent on the situation of the relevant labour market, including aspects such as labour laws or the current economic climate. 
V zvezi s kakovostjo zaposlitve na odprtem trgu meni, da bo vsaka ocena kakovosti odvisna od raz‐ mer na zadevnem trgu dela, vključno z vidiki, kot so delovno pravo ali trenutne gospodarske razmere.
Recommendation 2 The Commission accepts the recommendation and considers it as partially implemented, in particular through the Council Recommendation on a Quality Framework for Traineeships, the European Alliance for Apprenticeships and the related Council Decla‐ ration and the monitoring of the quality of employ‐ ment in the European Semester. 
Priporočilo 2 Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in meni, da je delno že izvedeno, zlasti prek Priporočila Sveta o okviru za kakovost pripravništev, Evropske koalicije za vajeništva in povezane izjave Sveta ter spremljanja kakovosti zaposlovanja v okviru evrop‐ skega semestra.
Regarding the promotion of qualitative attributes, the Commission will further stimulate the reflection around ‘good quality’ offers, taking into account the qualitative attributes mentioned in the Guid‐ ance for evaluation of the YEI. 
V zvezi s spodbujanjem kvalitativnih značilnosti bo še naprej spodbujala razmislek o kakovostnih ponudbah, pri čemer se bodo upoštevale kvalita‐ tivne značilnosti, omenjene v smernicah za vred‐ notenje PZM.