natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There are basically two types of intervention through which the donor community has sought to address the environmental aspects of development cooperation: adopted which included environment as a cross-cutting issue. 
V osnovi obstajata dve vrsti pomoči, s katerima so donatorji skušali rešiti okoljske vidike razvojnega sodelovanja: politika Evropskih skupnosti, ki je vključevala okolje kot medsektorsko vprašanje.
The development policy consensus agreed between the European Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament in December 2005 not only maintained the environment as a cross-cutting issue but also made environment and natural resources one of nine priority sectors for funding. 
S soglasjem o razvojni politiki, kakršno je bilo sprejeto med Evropsko komisijo, državami članicami in Evropskim parlamentom decembra 2005, okolje ne le da je ostalo medsektorsko vprašanje, ampak je skupaj z naravnimi viri postalo tudi eden od devetih prednostnih sektorjev za financiranje.
Audit scope and approach 4. 
Obseg revizije in pristop 4.
In view of the environmentŐs key role as one of the three pillars of sustainable development and its importance as one of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the European Court of Auditors carried out an audit in 2005 of the European CommissionŐs management of the environmental aspects of its development cooperation with Asian and Latin American developing countries, southern Mediterranean countries and the African, Caribbean and Pacific group of States. 
Ker ima okolje kot eden od treh stebrov trajnostnega razvoja ključno vlogo in ker je pomembno kot eden od razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja, je Evropsko računsko sodišče leta 2005 opravilo revizijo Komisijinega upravljanja okoljskih vidikov njenega razvojnega sodelovanja z azijskimi in latinskoameriškimi državami v razvoju, z državami južnega Sredozemlja ter skupino afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav.
More specifically, the audit focused on the following key questions (1): (a) does the Commission have a comprehensive overall strategy to deal with the environmental aspects of its development cooperation and has it made adequate management arrangements for implementing its strategy and assessing the environmental performance of its development aid? (b) has the Commission effectively mainstreamed the environment into all of its development cooperation? (c) have the environment programmes and projects financed by the Commission been effective? 
Revizija se je še zlasti osredotočila na naslednja ključna vprašanja (1): (a) Ali ima Komisija izčrpno splošno strategijo za reševanje okoljskih vidikov svojega razvojnega sodelovanja in ali je sprejela ustrezne ureditve upravljanja za izvajanje svoje strategije ter ocenjevanje okoljske učinkovitosti svoje razvojne pomoči? (b) Ali je Komisija uspešno integrirala okolje v celotno razvojno sodelovanje? (c) Ali so bili okoljski programi in projekti, ki jih je financirala Komisija, uspešni?
Environment is not an easy term to define. 
Pojem okolja je težko opredeliti.
For the purpose of this audit, environment was understood in the first place in accordance with the relatively narrow sense defined by the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) for project classification purposes (see Annex I). 
Za namen te revizije je bilo okolje razumljeno predvsem v skladu z relativno ozkim pomenom, kot ga za namen razvrstitve projektov opredeljuje Odbor za razvojno pomoč OECD (glej Prilogo I).
In addition, the audit also took into consideration the natural resource sectors (forestry, water, fisheries) and focused on one of these areas, namely for-estry(2). 
Poleg tega so bili pri reviziji upoštevani tudi sektorji naravnih virov (gozdar-stvo, vode, ribištvo), osredotočena pa je bila na eno od treh področij, gozdarstvo (2).
The commitments for programmes and projects (1) When addressing these key questions, the audit took into account the environmental auditing guidelines of the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). 
Obveznosti, prevzete za programe in (1) Pri obravnavanju teh ključnih vprašanj so bile pri reviziji upoštevane smernice okoljskega revidiranja Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucij (INTOSAI).
(2) The main reason for focusing on forestry is that the Commission has a special budget line for tropical and other forests (see paragraph 10). 
(2) Glavni razlog za osredotočanje na gozdarstvo je, da ima Komisija posebno proračunsko vrstico za tropske in ostale gozdove (glej odstavek 10).
While a special ACP-EU Water Facility was created in 2004, this is still at an early stage of implementation. (a) (b) the financing of programmes and projects whose principal objective is to improve environmental conditions; the integration of environmental concerns into all other types of development programmes and projects. 
Čeprav je bil leta 2004 ustanovljen poseben sklad za vodo AKP-EU, je ta še na zgodnji stopnji izvajanja. (a) (b) financiranje programov in projektov, katerih glavni cilj je izboljšati okoljske razmere; integracija okoljevarstvenih skrbi v vse druge vrste razvojnih programov in projektov.
This is commonly referred to as ÔmainstreamingŐ the environment. 
To je običajno opredeljeno kot integracija okolja.
In recent years the donor community, including the European Commission, has given increasing attention to this approach. 
V zadnjih letih donatorji, skupaj z Evropsko komisijo, temu pristopu posvečajo vse več pozornosti.
3. ronment in the context of development should be seen not only in terms of an increased recognition by donors of the importance of this approach but also in the context of the wider European Union legal and policy framework. 
3. vezavi z razvojem, ne bi smela biti obravnavana samo v smislu povečanega priznavanja pomembnosti tega pristopa s strani donatorjev, pač pa tudi v smislu širšega pravnega in političnega okvira Evropske unije.
Thus Article 6 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, as amended by the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam, stipulates that: ÔEnvironmental protection requirements must be integrated into the definition and implementation of Community policies and activities..., in particular with a view to promoting sustainable developmentŐ. 
Tako člen 6 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, kakor je bila leta 1997 spremenjena z Amsterdamsko pogodbo, določa: „Zahteve varstva okolja je treba vključevati v opredelitve in izvajanje politik in dejavnosti Skupnosti ..., zlasti zaradi spodbujanja trajnostnega razvoja“.
In June 1998 the Cardiff European Council stressed the importance of integrating environmental protection and sustainable development into the major policy areas, including development aid, managed by the Commission and invited it to put forward appropriate strategies. 
Junija 1998 je Evropski svet v Cardiffu poudaril pomembnost integracije varstva okolja in trajnostnega razvoja v glavna politična področja, vključno z razvojno pomočjo, ki jo upravlja Komisija, in jo naprosil, naj predstavi ustrezne strategije.
C 235/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.9.2006 in these areas in 2003 and 2004 are given in the table below: Table Budgetary commitments to environment and natural resource sector 2003 to 2004 (b) whether the Commission had established the management systems which ensure the implementation and follow-up of this strategy and assess the environmental performance of its aid. 
C 235/6 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 29.9.2006 projekte na teh področjih v letih 2003 in 2004, so prikazane v tabeli spodaj: Tabela Proračunske obveznosti za okolje in sektor naravnih virov 2003–2004 (b) ali je Komisija vzpostavila upravljavske sisteme, ki zagotavljajo izvajanje in spremljanje te strategije ter ocenjevanje okoljske učinkovitosti njene pomoči.
Need for a clear and comprehensive environment strategy 9. 
Potreba po jasni in izčrpni okoljski strategiji 9.
Environmental protection is one of the three pillars of sustainable development (1). 
Varstvo okolja je eden od treh stebrov trajnostnega razvoja (1).
As such it should be an essential component of development objectives (2). 
Zato bi moralo biti bistven del razvojnih ciljev (2).
The European CommunityŐs development policy adopted in November 2000, the overarching objective of which was poverty reduction, sought to address the environment by treating it as one of several Ôcross-cutting issuesŐ to be integrated into all development programmes and projects. 
Razvojna politika Evropske skupnosti, ki je bila sprejeta novembra 2000 s prednostnim ciljem zmanjšati revščino, je skušala okoljsko vprašanje rešiti tako, da ga je obravnavala kot eno od več „medsektor-skih vprašanj“, ki jih je treba vključiti v vse razvojne programe in projekte.
It did not, however, include the environment as one of the six priority fields on which financing of aid programmes and projects would be concentrated. 
Vendar okolje ni bilo zajeto kot eno od šestih prednostnih področij, na katerega bi se osredotočilo financiranje programov in projektov pomoči.
Area General environment protection Water supply and sanitation Commitments 2003 to 2004 (EDF and general budget of the EU; million euro) 279 679 Commitments as % of total Commission Aid 2003 to 2004 1,8 % 4,3 % 0,3 % 0,4 % 6,8 % Forestry 42 Fisheries 70 Total Source: European Commission. 
Področje Splošno varstvo okolja Oskrba z vodo in zdravstvo Prevzete obveznosti 2003–2004 (ERS in splošni proračun EU; v milijonih EUR) 279 679 Prevzete obveznosti kot % skupne pomoči Komisije 2003–2004 1,8 % 4,3 % 0,3 % 0,4 % 6,8 % Gozdarstvo 42 Ribištvo 70 Vir: Skupaj Evropska komisija.
1 070 6. Work was carried out at the CommissionŐs headquarters, notably at the Europeaid Cooperation Office (Europeaid), the Directorate-General for Development (DG DEV), the Directorate-General for External Relations (DG Relex) and also the Directorate-General for Environment (DG ENV), in order to identify and assess the systems established to manage the environmental aspects of development cooperation. 
1 070 6. upravljanje okoljskih vidikov razvojnega sodelovanja, je bilo delo opravljeno na sedežu Komisije, zlasti v Evropskem uradu za sodelovanje EuropeAid (EuropeAid), Generalnem direktoratu za razvoj (DG DEV), Generalnem direktoratu za zunanje odnose (DG Relex) in tudi Generalnem direktoratu za okolje (DG ENV).
On-the-spot missions were carried out in Botswana, Brazil, the Central America region, China, Congo, Gabon, Indonesia, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, the Pacific region and Tanzania. 
Obiski na kraju samem so bili opravljeni v Bocvani, Braziliji, na območju Srednje Amerike, na Kitajskem, v Kongu, Gabonu, Indo-neziji, Maliju, na Mauritiusu, v Maroku, na pacifiškem območju in v Tanzaniji.
During these missions the Court audited 65 environment projects, representing commitments of 560 million euro over the period 1995 to 2005, to assess their effectiveness. 
Sodišče je na teh revizijskih obiskih revidiralo 65 okoljskih projektov, ki so za obdobje 1995–2005 predstavljali prevzete obveznosti v višini 560 milijonov EUR, da bi ocenilo njihovo uspešnost.
In addition, it examined 43 other development programmes and projects (total commitments: 1 073 million euro), where support to the environment was not the primary objective, in order to assess how well environmental aspects had been integrated into these interventions. 
Poleg tega je preučilo še 43 drugih razvojnih programov in projektov (skupne prevzete obveznosti: 1 073 milijonov EUR), kjer glavni cilj ni bila okoljska podpora, ampak da bi ocenilo, kako dobro so bili v to posredovanje zajeti okoljski vidiki.
Meetings were also held with the World Bank, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the British Department for International Development (DFID), and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 
Ob tem so bili opravljeni tudi sestanki s Svetovno banko, Programom Združenih narodov za razvoj (UNDP), britanskim oddelkom za mednarodni razvoj (DFID) in Organizacijo za mednarodno sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD).
This allowed a comparison to be made with the CommissionŐs approach to managing the environmental aspects of its development cooperation. 
To je omogočilo primerjavo s pristopom Komisije k upravljanju okoljskih vidikov njenega razvojnega sodelovanja.
In addition, meetings were held with two leading NGOs in the field of the environment, the WWF (European Policy Office) and the International Institute for Environment and Development. 
Poleg tega so bili opravljeni tudi sestanki med dvema vodilnima nevladnima organizacijama na področju okolja, s Svetovnim skladom za naravo (Urad za evropsko politiko) in Mednarodnim inštitutom za okolje in razvoj.
COMMISSION STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT AID Introduction Box 1 The Council and Commission joint declaration of 10 November 2000 on the EC development policy Overarching objective: poverty reduction Priority fields of cooperation: (1) Trade and development (2) Regional integration and cooperation (3) Support to macro-economic policies and the promotion of equitable access to social services (4) Transport (5) Food security and sustainable rural development (6) Institutional capacity-building Main cross-cutting issues: Human rights, Environment, Gender Equality, Good Governance 8. (a) The audit sought to establish: whether the Commission had a comprehensive overall strategy for the environmental aspects of its development cooperation which took into account both the financing of environment programmes and projects and mainstreaming the environment into other development programmes and projects; (1) The other two pillars are economic well-being and social development. 
Prevoz 5. Varnost hrane in trajnostni razvoj podeželja 6. Izgradnja institucionalnih zmogljivosti Glavna medsektorska vprašanja: Človekove pravice, okolje, enakost spolov, dobro upravljanje 8. (a) Pri reviziji se je skušalo ugotoviti: ali je Komisija imela izčrpno splošno strategijo za okoljske vidike njenega razvojnega sodelovanja, v kateri sta bila upoštevana tako financiranje okoljskih programov in projektov kot integracija okolja v druge razvojne programe in projekte; (1) Druga dva stebra sta gospodarska blaginja in socialni razvoj.
The most widely used definition of sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (1987 Bruntland Report on Environment and Development). 
Najširše uporabljena opredelitev trajnostnega razvoja je, da tak razvoj izpolnjuje potrebe sedanjosti, ne da bi ogrožal zmožnost izpolnjevanja lastnih potreb prihodnjih generacij (Poročilo Bruntland o okolju in razvoju iz leta 1987).
(2) Article 177 of the EC Treaty states that sustainable development is an objective of development cooperation. 
(2) Člen 177 Pogodbe ES navaja, da je trajnostni razvoj cilj razvojnega sodelovanja.
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/7 10. 
29.9.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 235/7 10.
The development policy, in following an approach which focused very largely on mainstreaming the environment, did not sufficiently take into consideration the fact that existing regional cooperation frameworks with the ACP States (1), Asia and Latin America (ALA) (2) and the Mediterranean region (MEDA) (3) provided for the possibility of significant funding of programmes and projects in the environment and the wider natural resources sector. 
Razvojna politika je sledila pristopu, ki se je v glavnem osredotočil na integracijo okolja, vendar ni dovolj upoštevala dejstva, da so okviri regionalnega sodelovanja z državami AKP (1), Azijo in Latinsko Ameriko (ALA) (2) ter sredozemsko regijo (MEDA) (3) zagotavljali možnost precejšnjega financiranja programov in projektov na področju okolja ter širšega sektorja naravnih virov.
Indeed, budget lines for technical and financial assistance to ALA and MEDA regions set aside 10 % of financial resources for environment and natural resources. 
V proračunskih vrsticah za tehnično in finančno pomoč regijam ALA in MEDA je bilo 10 odstotkov finančnih virov dejansko rezerviranih za okolje in naravne vire.
At the same time, although not referred to in the development policy, a specific regulation on forest conservation and management stipulated that a sum of 249 million euro would be allocated to this purpose over the period 2000 to 2006 (4). 
Čeprav razvojna politika tega ni omenjala, je bilo istočasno v posebni uredbi o ohranjanju gozdov in gospodarjenju z njimi določeno, da se za obdobje 2000–2006 v ta namen dodeli znesek 249 milijonov EUR (4).
Box 2 Examples of strategic issues relating to the financing of environment programmes and projects What are the CommissionŐs objectives and priority areas for funding environment programmes and projects, taking into account its strengths and weaknesses and the role of other donors? 
Okvir 2 Primeri strateških vprašanj, ki so povezana s financiranjem okoljskih programov in projektov Kakšni so cilji in prednostna področja Komisije pri financiranju okoljskih programov in projektov ob upoštevanju njenih prednosti in pomanjkljivosti ter vloge donatorjev?
Where the Commission does provide financing for a specific programme or project, in what cases should it manage the project itself, and in what circumstances might other donors better manage the project? 
V katerih primerih Komisija zagotavlja financiranje za določen program ali projekt, v katerih primerih bi morala projekt upravljati sama in v kakšnih okoliščinah bi projekt lahko bolje upravljali drugi dona-torji?
What are the comparative advantages of the different instruments available to the Commission for financing interventions in the environment sector (ÔbigŐ projects, ÔsmallŐ projects, sector policy support programmes, trust funds etc)? 
Kakšne so primerjalne prednosti različnih instrumentov, ki so Komisiji na voljo za financiranje posredovanj v okoljskem sektorju („veli-ki“ projekti, „mali“ projekti, podporni programi sektorski politiki, skrbniški skladi itd.)?
What should be the link between projects funded through bilateral aid and through the Environment and Tropical Forest budget line? 
Kakšna bi morala biti povezava med projekti, ki se financirajo v okviru dvostranske pomoči in v okviru proračunske vrstice za okolje in tropske gozdove?
What are the financial implications of the CommissionŐs commitments under the MEAs, for example in relation to institution building in beneficiary countries? 
Kakšne so finančne posledice za obveznosti, ki jih je Komisija prevzela v okviru večstranskih okoljskih sporazumov, na primer v zvezi z institucionalno izgradnjo v državah upravičenkah?
How far and in what ways will the Commission address the issue of financing of global public goods? 
V kakšnem obsegu in na kakšne načine bo Komisija reševala vprašanje financiranja globalnih javnih dobrin?
What are the CommissionŐs objectives and funding priorities at regional level? 
Kakšni so cilji Komisije in prednostno financiranje na regionalni rav-ni?
The lack of full coherence between the development policyŐs approach to the environment on the one hand and the approach foreseen in legal frameworks for development cooperation on the other hand highlighted the need for a comprehensive overall strategy on the environmental aspects of development cooperation. 
Pomanjkanje popolne koherence med pristopom razvojne politike do okolja na eni strani in pristopom, predvidenim v pravnih okvirih za razvojno sodelovanje na drugi strani, je izpostavilo potrebo po izčrpni splošni strategiji za okoljske vidike razvojnega sodelovanja.
The main strategy paper drawn up by the Commission on the environmental aspects of its development cooperation is the Commission Staff Working Paper ÔIntegrating The Environment Into EC Economic and Development Cooperation Ń A Comprehensive StrategyŐ, of April 2001. 
Glavni strateški dokument, ki ga je Komisija pripravila o okoljskih vidikih svojega razvojnega sodelovanja, je delovni dokument uslužbencev Komisije z naslovom „In-tegracija okolja v ekonomsko in razvojno sodelovanje ES – izčrpna strategija“ („Integrating The Environment Into EC Economic and Development Cooperation – A Comprehensive Stra-tegy“) iz aprila 2001.
This document stresses the importance of the environment to sustainable development, outlines how it can be mainstreamed into overall EC development policy, and identifies actions to be taken to implement the strategy. 
V tem dokumentu je poudarjena pomembnost okolja za trajnostni razvoj, opisan način njegove integracije v splošno razvojno politiko ES in opredeljeni ukrepi, ki jih je treba sprejeti za izvajanje strategije.
However, it does not represent a comprehensive environment strategy of the kind adopted by several other donors which clearly address not only environmental mainstreaming but also the financing of environment programmes and projects. 
Vendar pa ne predstavlja izčrpne okoljske strategije, kakršno je sprejelo več drugih donatorjev, ki jasno obravnava ne le integracijo okolja, ampak tudi financiranje okoljskih programov in projektov.
Some of the key issues which such a strategy could be expected to address are set out in Box 2. 
Nekatera ključna vprašanja, ki bi jih taka strategija morala obravnavati, so navedena v okviru 2 spodaj.
(1) Article 32 of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement signed on 23 June 2000 (OJ L 317, 15.12.2000). 
(1) Člen 32 Kotonovskega sporazuma, ki je bil podpisan 23. junija 2000 (UL L 317, 15.12.2000).
(2) Article5ofCouncilRegulation(EEC)No443/92of25February1992 on financial and technical assistance to, and economic cooperation with, the developing countries in Asia and Latin America (OJ L 52, 27.2.1992, p. 
443/92 z dne 25. februarja 1992 o finančni in tehnični pomoči državam v Aziji in Latinski Ameriki ter o sodelovanju z njimi (UL L 52, 27.2.1992, str.
(3) Annex II of Council Regulation (EC) No 1488/96 of 23 July 1996 on financial and technical measures to accompany (MEDA) the reform of economical and social structures in the framework of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership (OJ L 189, 30.7.1996, p. 
1488/96 z dne 23. julija 1996 o finančnih in tehničnih ukrepih (MEDA) za spremljanje reforme gospodarskih in socialnih struktur v okviru Evro-sredozemskega partnerstva (UL L 189, 30.7.1996, str.
(4) Regulation (EC) No 2494/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 November 2000 on measures to promote the conservation and sustainable management of tropical forests and other forests in developing countries (OJ L 288, 15.11.2000, p. 
2494/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. novembra 2000 o ukrepih za spodbujanje ohranjanja tropskih gozdov in drugih gozdov v državah v razvoju ter trajnostnega gospodarjenja z njimi (UL L 288, 15.11.2000, str. 6).
In December 2005 a new EC Development Policy (The European Consensus on Development) was signed. 
Decembra 2005 je bila podpisana nova razvojna politika ES („Evropsko soglasje o razvoju“) („The European Consensus on Development“).
The new policy seeks to address the environmental aspects of the CommissionŐs development aid not only through environmental mainstreaming but also by making the environment and natural resources one of nine priority sectors for funding. 
Nova politika skuša obravnavati okoljske vidike razvojne pomoči Komisije ne le s pomočjo integracije okolja, ampak tudi tako, da okolje in naravni viri postanejo eden od devetih prednostnih sektorjev za financiranje.
In proposing this new approach the Commission recognised that the previous policy had relied too heavily on mainstreaming to ensure the environmental aspects of the CommissionŐs development cooperation were addressed (5). 
Komisija je pri predlogu tega novega pristopa priznala, da se je predhodna politika preveč naslanjala na integracijo, da bi zagotovila obravnavanje okoljskih vidikov razvojnega sodelovanja Komisije (5).
However, while the new policy makes clear the CommissionŐs intention to increase the priority it attaches to funding environmental programmes and projects, there remains the need to make the policy operational by establishing a clear strategy. 
Kljub temu, da je iz nove politike jasno razvidna namera Komisije, da financiranju okoljskih programov in projektov da še večjo prednost, še vedno obstaja potreba po vzpostavitvi delujoče politike z uvedbo jasne strategije.