natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recommendation 3 — Developing synergies between the FADN and other statistical tools The Commission’s analysis of farmers’ incomes should be based on indicators taking account of the current situation of agriculture and on sufficient and consistent data for all beneficiaries of CAP measures. 
Priporočilo 3 – Razvoj sinergij med mrežo FADN in drugimi statističnimi orodji Analiza dohodkov kmetov, ki jo opravlja Komisija, bi morala temeljiti na kazalnikih, ki upoštevajo trenutne razmere v kmetijstvu, in na zadostnih in doslednih podatkih za vse upravičence ukrepov SKP.
This could be done by developing synergies between existing administrative data or by developing the FADN or other suitable statistical tools. 
To bi se lahko doseglo z razvojem sinergij med obstoječimi upravnimi podatki ali z razvojem mreže FADN ali pa drugih ustreznih statističnih orodij.
The Commission and Member States did not always ensure that the data used for measurement of farmers’ incomes were of appropriate quality 96 The Commission had insufficient up-to-date information on the EAA methodology and data sources used by Member States, reporting to Eurostat was affected by shortcomings and the quality assurance arrangements were not fully effective. 
Komisija in države članice niso vedno zagotovile, da so podatki, ki se uporabljajo za merjenje dohodkov kmetov, ustrezne kakovosti 96 Komisija ni imela dovolj posodobljenih informacij o metodologiji in virih podatkov ERK, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, na poročanje Eurostatu so vplivale pomanjkljivosti, ureditve zagotavljanja kakovosti pa niso bile povsem uspešne.
This can affect the accuracy and impair the comparability of the data reported. 
To lahko vpliva na točnost in škoduje primerljivosti sporočenih podatkov.
It also calls into question the reliability of the Commission’s main indicators for monitoring the performance of the CAP (paragraphs 53 to 58). 
Tako je vprašljiva tudi zanesljivost glavnih kazalnikov za spremljanje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju SKP, ki jih uporablja Komisija (odstavki 53 do 58).
Recommendation 4 — Improving the quality of the EAAs In view of the importance of the EAAs for monitoring the CAP, the Commission should introduce regular quality reporting on the EAAs and obtain reasonable assurances that Member States set up a quality assurance framework to ensure that data provided by Member States are comparable and compiled in line with the quality criteria applying to European statistics. 
Priporočilo 4 – Izboljšanje kakovosti ERK Glede na pomen ERK pri spremljanju SKP naj Komisija uvede redno poročanje o kakovosti ERK in pridobi razumno zagotovilo, da so države članice vzpostavile okvir za zagotavljanje kakovosti za zagotovitev, da bodo podatki, ki jih posredujejo države članice, primerljivi in zbrani v skladu z merili kakovosti, ki se uporabljajo za evropsko statistiko.
Conclusions and recommendations 44 97 For the FADN, in some Member States the technical implementation of the survey affected the quality of the results, and the representativeness of the sample varied across Member States. 
Zaključki in priporočila 44 97 V okviru FADN je tehnična izvedba raziskovanja v nekaterih državah članicah vplivala na kakovost rezultatov, reprezentativnost vzorca pa je bila v državah članicah različna.
As a consequence, not all sectors, size classes and regions were sufficiently well represented in the FADN, which reduces its usefulness for analysis purposes. 
Zaradi tega vsi sektorji, velikostni razredi in regije niso bili dovolj dobro zastopani v FADN, kar zmanjšuje njeno uporabnost za namene analize.
Furthermore, insufficient funding by Member States for the collection of FADN data can impact the quality of the results obtained (paragraphs 59 to 72). 
Poleg tega lahko nezadostno financiranje držav članic za zbiranje podatkov FADN vpliva na kakovost dobljenih rezultatov (odstavki 59 do 72).
98 The audit identified certain weaknesses in the quality assurance arrangements for the FADN (paragraphs 73 to 76). 
98 Pri ureditvah za zagotavljanje kakovosti za FADN so bile pri reviziji ugotovljene nekatere slabosti (odstavki 73 do 76).
Recommendation 5 — Improving the quality of FADN The Commission should also address weaknesses identified in the implementation of the FADN by agreeing a clear timetable with the Member States concerned and encouraging better use of the system’s potential. 
Priporočilo 5 – Izboljšanje kakovosti FADN Komisija naj obravnava tudi slabosti, ugotovljene pri izvajanju FADN, ter se z zadevnimi državami članicami dogovori za jasen časovni načrt in spodbuja boljšo izkoriščenost potenciala sistema.
The Commission should further develop the present quality arrangements for the establishment of the FADN statistics by the Member States to ensure that, in all Member States, sectors and size classes of holdings that are of interest for the CAP are adequately represented, reflecting also the choices made by Member States in terms of CAP options. 
Komisija naj sedanje ureditve v zvezi s kakovostjo pri vzpostavitvi statističnih podatkov FADN v državah članicah nadalje razvije, da bi zagotovila, da so sektorji in velikostni razredi gospodarstev, ki so pomembni za SKP, v vseh državah članicah ustrezno zastopani, kar naj bi odražalo tudi odločitve držav članic v zvezi z možnostmi SKP.
The Commission has not defined relevant indicators allowing for an effective performance assessment of CAP measures in supporting farmers’ incomes 99 Vague objectives and the absence of a baseline make it difficult to assess on the basis of the performance indicators whether individual CAP measures aiming at the support of farmers’ incomes have achieved their objectives. 
Komisija še ni določila ustreznih kazalnikov, ki omogočajo uspešno oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v podporo dohodkom kmetov 99 Zaradi ohlapnih ciljev in odsotnosti izhodišča je na podlagi kazalnikov smotrnosti poslovanja težko oceniti, ali so posamezni ukrepi SKP, namenjeni podpori dohodkom kmetov, dosegli svoje cilje.
Member States’ choices for the implementation of direct payments are an additional challenge for the Commission’s analysis as to whether they contributed more efficiently and effectively to achieving the CAP objectives and thus added EU value (paragraphs 79 to 82). 
Odločitve držav članic pri izvajanju neposrednih plačil so za Komisijo dodaten izziv pri analizi, ali so bolj učinkovito in uspešno prispevale k doseganju ciljev SKP in s tem zagotovile dodano vrednost EU (odstavki 79 do 82).
Conclusions and recommendations 45 100 The Commission’s indicators in relation to viable food production and farmers’ incomes are not sufficiently reliable or are not linked clearly enough to CAP measures to show that they contributed effectively and efficiently towards the desired effects. 
Zaključki in priporočila 45 100 Kazalniki Komisije v zvezi s trajnostno proizvodnjo hrane in dohodki kmetov niso dovolj zanesljivi ali niso dovolj jasno povezani z ukrepi SKP, da bi odražali, ali so slednji uspešno in učinkovito prispevali k želenim učinkom.
Limitations in the availability of data further reduce the relevance of the indicators. 
Omejitve pri razpoložljivosti podatkov dodatno zmanjšujejo relevantnost kazalnikov.
They are also not informative as to whether the objectives were efficiently achieved, which requires an in-depth analysis of the factors impacting farmers’ incomes (paragraphs 83 to 87). 
Prav tako ne zagotavljajo informacij o tem, ali so bili cilji uspešno uresničeni, kar zahteva poglobljeno analizo dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na dohodke kmetov (odstavki 83 do 87).
Recommendation 6 — Improving the performance measurement of CAP measures supporting farmers’ incomes Taking into consideration the weaknesses identified by the Court, the Commission should improve the reliability and completeness of performance information of the CAP measures in relation to farmers’ incomes by: ο defining from the outset appropriate operational objectives and baselines against which the performance of the CAP measures can be compared for the next programming period; ο in the context of its evaluations, complementing the current framework of performance indicators with other relevant and good-quality data to measure the results achieved; ο also in the context of its evaluations, assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of the measures designed to support farmers’ incomes. 
Priporočilo 6 – Izboljšanje merjenja smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v podporo dohodkom kmetov Ob upoštevanju slabosti, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, naj Komisija izboljša zanesljivost in popolnost podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v zvezi z dohodki kmetov, tako da: ο na začetku opredeli ustrezne operativne cilje in izhodišča, na podlagi katerih se lahko primerja smotrnost poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP za naslednje programsko obdobje; ο v okviru svojih vrednotenj dopolni sedanji okvir za kazalnike smotrnosti poslovanja z drugimi ustreznimi in kakovostnimi podatki za oceno doseženih rezultatov; ο v okviru svojih vrednotenj oceni uspešnost in učinkovitost ukrepov, namenjenih podpori dohodkom kmetov.
This Report was adopted by Chamber I, headed by Mr Augustyn KUBIK, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 13 January 2016. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat I, ki ga vodi Augustyn KUBIK, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 13. januarja 2016.
Annexes 47 Calculation of agricultural income as defined under the EAAs – Intermediate consumption Final output of the agricultural industry = Gross value added at basic prices – Consumption of fixed capital = Net value added at basic prices = Agricultural factor income – Other taxes on production + Other subsidies on production Divided by total labour input Indicator A Indicator B + Interest received – Employees’ – Rent – Interest = Net entrepreneurial remuneration paid paid income Divided by unpaid labour input Indicator C Annex II 
Priloge 47 Izračun kmetijskega dohodka, kot je opredeljen v ERK – vmesna potrošnja končna proizvodnja kmetijske dejavnosti = bruto dodana vrednost v osnovnih cenah – potrošnja stalnega kapitala = neto dodana vrednost v osnovnih cenah – drugi davki na proizvodnjo + druge subvencije na proizvodnjo = faktorski dohodek kmetijstva deljeno s skupnim vložkom dela kazalnik A kazalnik B + prejete obresti – nadomestila zaposlenih – plačana – plačane = neto podjetniški dohodek deljeno z vložkom neplačanega dela najem-obresti nina kazalnik C Priloga II
Annexes 48 Calculation of income in the framework of the FADN + Sales + Farmhouse consumption Final stock agricultural products + Correction livestock inventory values + Farm use = Output (crop output plus livestock output) – Intermediate consumption + Farm subsidies – Balance of VAT and farm taxes = Farm gross value added (gross farm income) – Depreciation = Farm net value added (FNVA) + Subsidies on investments – Wages, rents and interest paid = Family farm income (FWI) – Starter stock agricultural products – Purchases of livestock Annex III 
Priloge 48 Izračun dohodka v okviru mreže FADN + prodaja + poraba v kmečkem gospodinjstvu končne zaloge kmetijskih proizvodov + popravki vrednosti zalog živine + poraba kmetije = proizvodnja (pridelkov in živine) – vmesna potrošnja + subvencije kmetije – saldo DDV in davkov kmetije = bruto dodana vrednost kmetije (bruto dohodek kmetije) – amortizacija = neto dodana vrednost kmetije + subvencije na naložbe – plače, najemnine in plačane obresti = dohodek družinske kmetije – začetne zaloge kmetijskih proizvodov – nabava živine Priloga III
Annexes 51 Quality criteria applying to European statistics1 Principles of the Eurostat code of practice Relevance Accuracy Timeliness Punctuality Accessibility and clarity Comparability Coherence Degree to which statistics meet current and potential needs of the users. 
Priloge 51 Merila kakovosti, ki se uporabljajo za evropsko statistiko1 Načela kodeksa ravnanja Eurostata Ustreznost Natančnost Pravočasnost Točnost Dostopnost in jasnost Primerljivost Skladnost Stopnja, do katere statistika ustreza sedanjim in potencialnim potrebam uporabnikov.
Closeness of estimates to the unknown true values. 
Prileganje ocenjenih vrednosti dejanskim, toda neznanim vrednostim.
Period between the availability of the information and the event or phenomenon it describes. 
Časovni zamik med dostopnostjo informacij in dogodkom ali pojavom, ki ga opisujejo.
Delay between the date of the release of the data and the date by which the data should have been delivered. 
Časovni zamik med datumom objave podatkov in datumom, ko bi se podatki morali zagotoviti.
Conditions and procedures by which users can obtain, use and interpret data. 
Pogoji in načini, na podlagi katerih lahko uporabniki pridobijo, uporabljajo in razlagajo podatke.
Measurement of the impact of differences in applied statistical concepts, measurement tools and procedures where statistics are compared among geographical areas, sectoral domains or over time. 
Vpliv razlik v uporabljenih statističnih konceptih, merskih orodjih in postopkih pri primerjavi statistike med zemljepisnimi območji, sektorskimi področji ali skozi čas.
Adequacy of the data to be reliably combined in different ways and for various uses. 
Primernost podatkov za njihovo zanesljivo povezovanje na različne načine in za različno uporabo.
1 Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009. 
1 Člen 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 223/2009.
Reply of the 52 Commission Executive summary I The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) specifies five objectives of the common agricultural policy (CAP), only one of which is linked to farmers’ income (but without actually mentioning the word income). 
Odgovori 52 Komisije Povzetek I Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) določa pet ciljev SKP, od katerih je samo eden povezan z dohodki kmetov (pri čemer beseda dohodek dejansko ni omenjena).
The 2013 reform of the CAP specifies three policy objectives (viable food production; sustainable management of natural resources and climate action; balanced territorial development), the first of which mentions agricultural income specifically. 
Reforma SKP iz leta 2013 določa tri cilje politike (trajnostno proizvodnjo hrane, trajnostno upravljanje naravnih virov in podnebne ukrepe ter uravnotežen teritorialni razvoj), od katerih prvi izrecno omenja kmetijske dohodke.
However income is not the only CAP objective and direct payments are not the only CAP instrument having an impact on income; neither is their impact limited to income as they support the joint delivery of private and public goods. 
Vendar dohodki niso edini cilj SKP, neposredna plačila pa ne edini instrument SKP, ki vpliva nanje; prav tako ni učinek neposrednih plačil omejen na dohodke, saj podpirajo skupno zagotavljanje zasebnih in javnih dobrin.
As area-based payments, they contribute not just to income support for farmers, but to other objectives related to land use, such as soil protection, biodiversity enhancement and climate mitigation, jointly with other CAP instruments. 
Kot plačila na površino ne prispevajo le k dohodkovni podpori za kmete, temveč skupaj z drugimi instrumenti SKP tudi k drugim ciljem, povezanim z rabo zemljišč, kot so varstvo tal, večja biotska raznovrstnost in ublažitev podnebnih sprememb.
It is thus extremely difficult to clearly allocate certain payments to individual impacts. 
Zato je izjemno težko jasno določiti, kakšen učinek ima določeno plačilo.
II The new monitoring and evaluation framework of the CAP is clearly designed by the legislator. 
II Zakonodajalec je jasno zasnoval novi okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja SKP.
It has been designed to capture the combined effects of the different measures as regards these different objectives. 
Ta naj bi zajel skupne učinke različnih ukrepov glede teh različnih ciljev.
Each of these objectives will be monitored and assessed using a comprehensive set of common indicators, some specific to measures and some broader ones to reflect combined effects. 
Vsak od teh ciljev se bo spremljal in ocenjeval na podlagi celovitega sklopa skupnih kazalnikov, od katerih se nekateri nanašajo posebej na ukrepe, nekateri pa so širši, da upoštevajo skupne učinke.
While useful as a starting point, individual indicators cannot directly assess the impact of a policy or measure; this needs to be done in an evaluation, taking into account other elements that influence the policy and its effects. 
Posamezni kazalniki so sicer koristni kot izhodišče, vendar ne morejo neposredno oceniti učinka politike ali ukrepa; to je treba storiti pri vrednotenju in pri tem upoštevati druge elemente, ki vplivajo na politiko in njene učinke.
Hence, the advantages or disadvantages of individual indicators will depend on how these are used in the evaluation. 
Zato bodo prednosti ali slabosti posameznih kazalnikov odvisne od tega, kako se uporabijo pri vrednotenju.
IV Individual indicators and tools have stronger and weaker points, however the overall system provides the best possible balance between the information needs and the related costs and administrative burdens. 
IV Posamezni kazalniki in orodja imajo močnejše in šibkejše točke, vendar celotni sistem zagotavlja najboljše možno ravnovesje med potrebami po informacijah ter s tem povezanimi stroški in upravnim bremenom.
What is identified as limitations of the statistical data is in fact the representation of the main features of the data sources. 
Kar je opredeljeno kot omejitev statističnih podatkov, je dejansko predstavitev glavnih značilnosti podatkovnih virov.
V The Commission has representative data on the income derived from agricultural activities. 
V Komisija ima reprezentativne podatke o dohodku iz kmetijskih dejavnosti.
These data can be used to assess the performance of CAP measures in support of farmers’ incomes. 
Te podatke je mogoče uporabiti za oceno uspešnosti izvajanja ukrepov SKP v podporo dohodkom kmetov.
In the treaty, there is a link between increasing agricultural productivity and ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture. 
V Pogodbi je navedena povezava med povečanjem kmetijske produktivnosti in zagotavljanjem primerne življenjske ravni kmetijske skupnosti, zlasti s povečanjem individualnega zaslužka oseb, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom.
It is thus appropriate to focus on the income derived from agricultural activities, as this income is of primary importance for the CAP. 
Zato se je primerno osredotočiti na dohodek iz kmetijskih dejavnosti, saj ima ta največji pomen za SKP.
Reply of the Commission 53 VI (a) - The FADN is not designed to collect data on farm household income The FADN is a key data source for the CAP monitoring and evaluation framework. 
Odgovori Komisije 53 VI(a) – Mreža FADN ni zasnovana za zbiranje podatkov o dohodku kmečkih gospodinjstev Mreža FADN je ključni vir podatkov za okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja SKP.
The objectives of the FADN are clearly laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 of 30 November 2009, i.e. to collect the accountancy data needed for the annual determination of incomes on agricultural holdings coming within the field of the survey and a business analysis of agricultural holdings, an assessment of the standard of living of farmers or of farm household income is outside the scope of the FADN. 
Njeni cilji so jasno določeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1217/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009, tj. zbiranje računovodskih podatkov, potrebnih za letno določanje dohodkov kmetijskih gospodarstev, ki spadajo na področje statističnih raziskav, in poslovno analizo kmetijskih gospodarstev; ocenjevanje življenjske ravni kmetov ali dohodka kmečkih gospodinjstev je zunaj področja uporabe mreže FADN.
VI (b) - The costs of collecting data on farm household income may outweigh the benefits The Commission is aware of the overall analytical value of statistics covering household income in different sectors and various attempts to introduce such data collection have been made in recent years. 
VI(b) – Stroški zbiranja podatkov o dohodku kmečkih gospodinjstev lahko prevladajo nad koristmi Komisija se zaveda splošne analitične vrednosti statističnih podatkov, ki pokrivajo dohodek gospodinjstva v različnih sektorjih, zato je bilo v zadnjih letih več različnih poskusov, da bi uvedli tako zbiranje podatkov.
However, also due to the resistance from the Member States to including information on taxation in statistics, the discussion has not achieved positive conclusions. 
Vendar razprava, tudi zaradi nepripravljenosti držav članic, da v statistiko vključijo informacije o obdavčevanju, ni prinesla pozitivnih zaključkov.
Given that the CAP focuses on supporting income from agricultural and rural development activities, an overall monitoring of farm household income was not a priority, nor was it feasible to include this new data collection in the statistical work programme. 
Ker je SKP osredotočena na dohodkovno podporo iz kmetijskih dejavnosti in dejavnosti razvoja podeželja, splošno spremljanje dohodka kmečkih gospodinjstev ni bilo prednostna naloga niti ni bilo izvedljivo, da bi se to novo zbiranje podatkov vključilo v statistični program dela.
Instead, a specific EU survey (EU-SILC) has been designed to collect information on the standard of living of EU households. 
Namesto tega je bila zasnovana posebna statistična raziskava EU (SILC) za zbiranje informacij o življenjski ravni gospodinjstev v EU.
VI (c) - The information on agricultural income provided by the FADN is complete Indeed, the FADN sample covers only those farms with accounting and bookkeeping practices, since the inclusion of non-commercial farms would imply the presence of less reliable data based more on estimation than on hard evidence. 
VI(c) – Informacije o kmetijskem dohodku, ki jih je zagotovila mreža FADN, so popolne Vzorec FADN dejansko zajema le kmetije z računovodsko in knjigovodsko prakso, saj bi vključitev nekomercialnih kmetij pomenila vključenost manj zanesljivih podatkov, ki bolj temeljijo na oceni kot na trdnih dokazih.
However, the use of different thresholds per EU Member State allows the FADN sample to cover farms of different economic size and thus to take into account differences in the commercial nature of farms in the different agricultural sectors all around Europe. 
Vendar uporaba različnih pragov po državah članicah EU omogoča, da vzorec FADN pokrije kmetije različne gospodarske velikosti in s tem upošteva razlike v trgovinski naravi kmetij v različnih kmetijskih sektorjih po vsej Evropi.
VII The thorough system of data checks and validation put in place by the Commission for the FADN ensures that the high level of quality of the collected data is verified and guaranteed. 
VII Temeljit sistem pregledov in potrjevanja podatkov, ki ga je Komisija vzpostavila za mrežo FADN, zagotavlja, da se preverja in zagotavlja visoka raven kakovosti zbranih podatkov.
Moreover, on-the-spot visits allow the follow-up of identified issues. 
Poleg tega obiski na kraju samem omogočajo nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi z ugotovljenimi težavami.
The Court did not identify any concrete weakness in the data validation procedures put in place by the Commission services. 
Sodišče ni odkrilo konkretnih slabosti pri postopkih potrjevanja podatkov, ki so jih vzpostavile službe Komisije.
The extensive use of FADN data within the Commission services and by the research community ensures that primary users can effectively check the quality of the data. 
Obsežna uporaba podatkov mreže FADN v službah Komisije in raziskovalni skupnosti zagotavlja, da lahko primarni uporabniki učinkovito preverijo kakovost podatkov.
VIII Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 clearly specifies the objectives against which the monitoring and evaluation framework has to measure the performance of the CAP. 
1306/2013 jasno določa cilje, na podlagi katerih se z okvirom spremljanja in vrednotenja meri uspešnost izvajanja SKP.