natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Figure 3 – Responsibilities for inventories, projections, policies and measures 14 o o o Estimate past and future emissions and the effects of the national policies and measures on emissions Submit these estimates to the EU and the UNFCCC Improve the data following recommendations of the EU and UNFCCC review European Commission o Prepare EU scenarios o Proposes new policies and measures to reduce emissions o Estimate the effects of EU policies and measures on emissions and submits this information to the UNFCCC European Commission assisted by the EEA o Review estimates received from Member States and recommend improvements o Compile and check EU aggregated inventories and projections, and submits those to the UNFCCC Member States UNFCCC Secretariat o Reviews the estimates submitted by the Member States and the Commission on past and future emissions and the information on the effects of policies and measures • • o Recommends improvements Preparation and submission of data on past and future emissions and on policies and measures Providing insight into future emission reductions © European Commission, EEA, UNFCCC. 
Evropska komisija o pripravi scenarije EU, o predlaga nove politike in ukrepe za zmanjšanje emisij, o oceni učinke politik in ukrepov EU na emisije ter informacije o tem predloži konvenciji UNFCCC. Evropska komisija s pomočjo EEA o pregleda ocene, ki jih predložijo države članice, in priporoči izboljšave, o pripravlja in preverja zbirne evidence in projekcije EU ter jih predloži konvenciji UNFCCC. Države članice Sekretariat konvencije UNFCCFC o pregleda ocene preteklih in prihodnjih emisij, ki jih predložijo države članice in Komisija, terinformacije o učinkih politik in ukrepov, o priporoči izboljšave. • • Priprava in predložitev podatkov o preteklih in prihodnjih emisijah ter o politikah in ukrepih Zagotavljanje vpogleda v prihodnja zmanjšanja emisij © Evropska komisija, EEA, konvencija UNFCCC.
Audit scope and approach 16 Our audit covered the design and functioning of the EU’s reporting and quality assurance framework for data reported since 2015 under the Kyoto protocol and the EU Monitoring Mechanism Regulation. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 16 V reviziji je Sodišče zajelo zasnovo in delovanje okvira EU za poročanje in zagotavljanje kakovosti za podatke, ki so bili sporočeni od leta 2015 v okviru Kjotskega protokola in uredbe EU o mehanizmu za spremljanje podnebja.
17 We carried out this audit because our landscape review on EU action on energy and climate change of 2017 identified inventories of greenhouse gas emissions as an area of potential risk in which limited audit work had taken place. 
17 Revizijo je izvedlo, ker je v svojem dokumentu iz leta 2017 z naslovom Panoramski pregled: Ukrepanje EU na področju energetike in podnebnih sprememb opredelilo evidence emisij toplogrednih plinov kot področje morebitnega tveganja, kjer revizijsko delo ni bilo celovito.
We expect our conclusions and recommendations to provide a useful input for the improvement of the Commission review process of greenhouse gas emission data and of the framework for future emission reductions. 
Sodišče pričakuje, da bodo njegovi zaključki in priporočila koristno prispevali k izboljšanju postopka Komisije za pregled podatkov o emisijah toplogrednih plinov in okvira za prihodnja zmanjšanja emisij.
18 Our overall audit question was: 19 To answer our overall audit question, we: (a) assessed the quality checks done on the EU greenhouse gas inventory; (b) examined the additional information on planned reduction of EU greenhouse gas emissions (EU projections and reference scenario, long-term strategies, quantification of the effects of EU policies and measures). 
18 Splošno revizijsko vprašanje Sodišča je bilo: 19 Da bi lahko Sodišče odgovorilo na to splošno revizijsko vprašanje, je: (a) ocenilo kontrole kakovosti, opravljene pri evidenci toplogrednih plinov EU; (b) preučilo dodatne informacije o načrtovanem zmanjšanju emisij toplogrednih plinov v EU (projekcije in referenčni scenarij EU, dolgoročne strategije, količinsko opredelitev učinkov politik in ukrepov EU).
We did not directly check the information and estimates produced by Member State authorities. 
Pri reviziji niso bile neposredno preverjene informacije in ocene, ki so jih priskrbele države članice.
20 We checked the functioning of the EU quality assurance process for inventories, projections, policies and measures put in place by the Monitoring Mechanism Regulation and its implementing rules, through a sample of six Member States. 
20 Sodišče je preverilo delovanje postopka EU za zagotavljanje kakovosti evidenc, projekcij, politik in ukrepov, vzpostavljenih z uredbo o mehanizmu za spremljanje podnebja in njenimi izvedbenimi pravili, v vzorcu šestih držav članic.
The main criteria for selection were the annual emissions in 2016 and the number of UNFCCC recommendations from the 2015-2017 annual reviews of the national inventories. 
Glavna merila za izbor so bile letne emisije v letu 2016 in število priporočil konvencije UNFCCC iz letnih pregledov nacionalnih evidenc za obdobje 2015–2017.
The Member States in the sample were Czechia, Germany, France, Italy, Poland and Romania. 
Države članice, zajete v vzorec, so bile Češka, Nemčija, Francija, Italija, Poljska in Romunija.
They produced 56 % of EU emissions in 2016. 
Leta 2016 so proizvedle 56 % emisij v EU.
Does the Commission appropriately check the EU greenhouse gas inventory and the information on future emission reductions? 15 
Ali je Komisija ustrezno preverila kakovost evidence toplogrednih plinov EU in informacije o prihodnjih zmanjšanjih emisij? 15
We sought to obtain information on the Commission reviews of the national and aggregated EU inventories, policies and measures, and on using infrastructures and modelling tools for the in situ and satellite monitoring of the greenhouse gases and of their flows. 
Sodišče je skušalo pridobiti informacije o pregledih nacionalnih in zbirnih evidenc, politik in ukrepov EU, ki jih opravlja Komisija, ter o uporabi infrastrukture in orodij za modeliranje za spremljanje toplogrednih plinov in njihovih tokov na kraju samem in prek satelitskega sistema.
16 18 The UNFCCC Secretariat, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS), an EU-wide project funded by the 7th Framework Programme for Research. 
16 18 Sekretariat konvencije UNFCCC, Svetovna meteorološka organizacija in Integrirani sistem za opazovanje ogljika – projekt na ravni EU, ki se financira iz 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave.
Observations The Commission checks and reports EU emission data appropriately 22 We assessed the extent to which the range of emission data reported by the EU meets international requirements. 
Opažanja Komisija podatke o emisijah v EU ustrezno preverja in sporoča 22 Sodišče je ocenilo, v kolikšni meri je nabor podatkov o emisijah, ki jih je sporočila EU, skladen z mednarodnimi zahtevami.
We also examined the operation and results of the quality review of the EU and Member States’ inventories, and assessed whether the EU inventory had improved over time. 
Preučilo je tudi delovanje in rezultate pregleda kakovosti evidenc EU in držav članic ter ocenilo, ali so se evidence EU sčasoma izboljšale.
EU reports meet and exceed international requirements 23 The Kyoto Protocol requires the EU and each of its Member States to reduce their emissions of the seven main greenhouse gases by 20 % by 2020: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). 
Poročila EU izpolnjujejo in presegajo mednarodne zahteve 23 V skladu s Kjotskim protokolom morajo EU in vsaka od njenih držav članic do leta 2020 za 20 % zmanjšati svoje emisije sedmih glavnih toplogrednih plinov: ogljikovega dioksida (CO2), metana (CH4), dušikovega oksida (N2O), delno halogeniranih fluoroogljikovodikov (HFC), perfluoriranih ogljikovodikov (PFC), žveplovega heksafluorida (SF6) in dušikovega trifluorida (NF3).
The full range of gases and agreements is detailed in Figure C and Figure D of the Annex. 
Celoten podrobni seznam plinov in sporazumov je naveden na sliki C in sliki D Priloge.
The IPCC guidelines specify methods for estimating the emissions and removals of these gases, originating from sources and sinks that must be considered under the Kyoto Protocol: Energy, Industrial Processes and Product Use, Agriculture, LULUCF and Waste. 
Smernice IPCC natančno določajo metode za ocenjevanje emisij in odvzemov teh plinov, ki izhajajo iz virov in ponorov, ki jih je treba upoštevati v okviru Kjotskega protokola: energetika, industrijski procesi in uporaba izdelkov, kmetijstvo, LULUCF in odpadki.
We found that the EU and the Member States complied with these requirements. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da EU in države članice te zahteve izpolnjujejo.
24 The EU and the Member States’ inventories are also required to include gases, sources and sinks which are not covered by the Kyoto Protocol emissions reduction commitments, but which fall under the UNFCCC reporting rules. 
24 Evidence EU in držav članic morajo vključevati tudi pline, vire in ponore, ki niso zajeti v zavezah za zmanjšanje emisij iz Kjotskega protokola, temveč spadajo v pravila konvencije UNFCCC o poročanju.
These gases, sources and sinks are reported as “memorandum items”. 
Ti plini, viri in ponori se sporočajo kot pojasnjevalne postavke.
They concern emissions from international shipping, international aviation, and biomass for energy use. 
Nanašajo se na emisije iz mednarodnega ladijskega prometa, mednarodnega letalstva in biomase za pridobivanje energije.
The aggregated EU inventory includes data on emissions for all of these memorandum items, in accordance with the UNFCCC reporting rules. 
Zbirna evidenca EU vključuje podatke o emisijah za vse te pojasnjevalne postavke v skladu s pravili konvencije UNFCCC o poročanju.
25 The EU Monitoring Mechanism Regulation (see paragraph 11) establishes reporting rules beyond those set out in international agreements. 
25 V uredbi EU o mehanizmu za spremljanje podnebja (glej odstavek 11) so določena pravila o poročanju, ki presegajo pravila iz mednarodnih sporazumov.
The Regulation requires the Commission to report on black carbon (soot) emissions19 and the non-CO2 19 Fine particulate matter which has both a cooling and a warming effect on the atmosphere. 17 
V skladu z uredbo mora Komisija poročati o emisijah črnega ogljika (saj)19 in vplivih civilnega 19 Drobni delci, ki ozračje hladijo in tudi segrevajo. 17
impacts of EU civil aviation on climate20. 
letalstva EU, ki niso povezani s CO2, na podnebje20.
The Commission publishes an EU aggregate for black carbon on the basis of data provided by the Member States. 
Komisija objavi zbirne evidence EU za črni ogljik na podlagi podatkov, ki jih predložijo države članice.
The Commission also reports on the non-CO2 impacts of aviation21. 
Komisija poroča tudi o vplivih letalstva, ki niso povezani s CO221.
According to the 2019 European Aviation Environmental Report, the non-CO2 impacts of aviation exceed the CO2 impacts. 
V skladu z okoljskim poročilom o evropskem letalstvu za leto 2019 vplivi letalstva, ki niso povezani s CO2, presegajo vplive, povezane s CO2.
However, the scientific data currently available on such impacts is insufficient to quantify them precisely22. 
Vendar so znanstveni podatki, ki so trenutno na voljo o teh vplivih, nezadostni, da bi lahko vplive natančno količinsko opredelili22.
26 The Commission also prepares data on emissions generated by the consumption of goods and services within the EU (including imports, but excluding exports). 
26 Komisija pripravlja tudi podatke o emisijah, nastalih v okviru porabe blaga in storitev v EU (vključno z uvozom, vendar brez izvoza).
This information, called carbon footprint, allows for a complementary understanding of the economic drivers of air emissions, and in particular, of the EU impact on global emissions. 
Te informacije, imenovane ogljični odtis, omogočajo dopolnjeno razumevanje gospodarskih vzrokov za emisije v zrak, zlasti vpliva EU na globalne emisije.
It can encourage new approaches in policy-making and contribute to defining indicators of sustainable production and consumption23. 
Spodbujajo lahko nove pristope pri oblikovanju politik in prispevajo k opredelitvi kazalnikov trajnostne proizvodnje in porabe23.
27 Eurostat has estimated the EU carbon footprint to be 7.2 tonnes of CO2 per person (2017). 
27 Eurostat je ocenil, da je ogljični odtis EU 7,2 tone CO2 na osebo (2017).
However, the underlying calculation for the carbon footprint is complex24. 
Vendar je zadevni izračun ogljičnega odtisa kompleksen24.
The Commission and EEA quality review of the reported emissions is satisfactory 28 The Commission and EEA quality review process of national greenhouse gas inventories focuses on categories of emissions which, if over-or underestimated, could have a significant effect on Member States’ inventories and on the aggregated EU inventory. 
Pregled kakovosti sporočenih emisij, ki sta ga opravila Komisija in EEA, je zadovoljiv 28 Postopek za pregled kakovosti nacionalnih evidenc toplogrednih plinov, ki ga opravljata Komisija in EEA, je osredotočen na kategorije emisij, ki bi lahko, če bi bile ocenjene prenizko ali previsoko, bistveno vplivale na evidence držav članic in zbirno evidenco EU.
The review process focuses on the quality criteria defined by the UNFCCC guidelines: transparency, completeness, consistency, comparability and accuracy. 
Postopek pregleda je osredotočen na merila kakovosti, opredeljena v smernicah konvencije UNFCCC: preglednost, popolnost, doslednost, primerljivost in točnost.
The UNFCCC also reviews the estimates submitted by the Member States and the Commission (see Figure 3). 
Konvencija UNFCCC pregleduje tudi ocene, ki jih predložijo države članice in Komisija (glej sliko 3).
20 Such as aerosols and cloud formation, with an indirect warming effect on the atmosphere. 
20 Na primer aerosoli in tvorjenje oblakov, s posrednim vplivom na segrevanja ozračja.
21 Report COM/2018/716 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council “EU and the Paris Climate Agreement: Taking stock of progress at Katowice COP”. 
21 Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom EU in Pariški sporazum o podnebnih spremembah: ocena napredka na podnebni konferenci v Katovicah (COM(2018) 716).
22 The European Aviation Environmental Report of 2019. https://www.easa.europa.eu/eaer/. 
22 The European Aviation Environmental Report 2019. https://www.easa.europa.eu/eaer/.
23 EEA technical report No 20/2013: “European Union CO2 emissions: different accounting perspectives”. 
23 Tehnično poročilo EEA št. 20/2013 – European Union CO2 emissions: different accounting perspectives.
24 See also Box 3 in our special report 16/2019 “European Environmental Economic Accounts: usefulness for policymakers can be improved”. 
24 Glej tudi okvir 3 Posebnega poročila Sodišča št.
18 29 The review process consists of automated and manual checks. 
18 29 Postopek pregleda je sestavljen iz avtomatiziranih in ročnih pregledov.
Automated checks identify missing data and potential discrepancies in emissions, emission factors and trends. 
Pri avtomatiziranih pregledih se opredelijo manjkajoči podatki in morebitne neskladnosti pri emisijah, emisijskih faktorjih in trendih.
Expert reviewers perform manual checks, judging whether the findings of the automated checks are real issues or not, and whether the data and methods are plausible, i.e. not leading to over-or underestimations of emissions. 
Strokovnjaki pregledovalci izvajajo ročne preglede, da bi presodili, ali so ugotovitve avtomatiziranega preverjanja dejansko problematične ali ne in ali so podatki in metode verodostojni, tj. ne vodijo v previsoke ali prenizke ocene emisij.
The reviewers work in teams, and the findings of a reviewer are always corroborated by a second reviewer. 
Pregledovalci delajo v ekipah, ugotovitve enega pregledovalca pa vedno potrdi še drugi.
30 In the first step of the review process, reviewers verify estimates for all sectors of the greenhouse gas inventories: energy, industrial processes and product use, agriculture, LULUCF and waste. 
30 Pregledovalci v prvi fazi postopka pregleda preverijo ocene za vse sektorje evidenc toplogrednih plinov: energetiko, industrijske procese in uporabo izdelkov, kmetijstvo, LULUCF in odpadke.
The reviewers document the results of their checks and communicate their observations to the Member States. 
Rezultate svojih pregledov dokumentirajo in svoja opažanja sporočijo državam članicam.
In the second step, the reviewers verify the compliance issues not solved in the first step that would have a significant effect on the final emission estimate and may address recommendations on improving the inventories. 
V drugi fazi preverjajo zadeve v zvezi s skladnostjo, ki niso bile rešene v prvi, bi pa bistveno vplivale na končno oceno emisij, in lahko obravnavajo priporočila za izboljšanje evidenc.
However, the Commission reviewers do not document well their follow-up of previous Commission recommendations or their work on less significant issues detected by automated checks. 
Vendar pa pregledovalci s Komisije ne dokumentirajo dobro svojega spremljanja izvajanja prejšnjih priporočil Komisije ali svojega dela v zvezi z manj pomembnimi zadevami, odkritimi z avtomatizirani pregledi.
We also found that the Commission’s follow-up on unresolved issues identified by the UNFCCC reviews was based on incomplete information reported by the Member States. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da je spremljanje upoštevanja nerešenih zadev, opredeljenih v pregledih konvencije UNFCCC, ki ga je opravila Komisija, temeljilo na nepopolnih informacijah, ki so jih sporočile države članice.
In 2018, for our selection of Member states, we found documentation that the Commission reviewers followed up on 11 issues raised in the 2016 UNFCCC review reports. 
Leta 2018 je Sodišče za države članice iz svojega izbora našlo dokumentacijo o tem, da so pregledovalci Komisije spremljali 11 zadev, ugotovljenih v poročilih o pregledu UNFCCC iz leta 2016.
However, the UNFCCC reviewers had identified 64 persisting issues in their 2016 reviews. 
Vendar so pregledovalci UNFCCC v svojih pregledih iz leta 2016 opredelili 64 zadev, ki še niso bile rešene.
31 The LULUCF sector (see Box 2) is not covered by the EU 2020 target. 
31 Sektor LULUCF (glej okvir 2) ni zajet v cilj EU za leto 2020.
While LULUCF is included in the first step of the review, the Commission does not currently make recommendations, nor follow-up on most UNFCCC recommendations addressed to Member States. 
Čeprav je ta sektor vključen v prvo fazo pregleda, Komisija trenutno ne daje priporočil niti ne spremlja večine državam članicam namenjenih priporočil konvencije UNFCCC.
The LULUCF data reported in the aggregated EU inventory indicates that this sector currently removes more CO2 from the atmosphere than it emits (removal of 5.54 % of the EU emissions in 2017; see Figure 6). 
Podatki o LULUCF, sporočeni v zbirni evidenci EU, kažejo, da ta sektor trenutno iz ozračja odstrani več CO2, kot pa ga vanj izpusti (odvzem 5,54 % emisij EU v letu 2017; glej sliko 6).
Thus, the LULUCF sector is considered a net carbon sink. 
Sektor LULUCF zato šteje kot neto ponor ogljika, vendar je za podatke o LULUCF značilna razmeroma visoka statistična negotovost25.
Following the recent adoption of the LULUCF Regulation No 841/2018 that incorporates the sector in the 2030 target, the Commission plans to perform a complete review process for this sector starting with emissions reported in 2023 for the year 2021. 
Po nedavnem sprejetju uredbe LULUCF (Uredba št. 841/2018), ki vključuje ta sektor v cilj za leto 2030, namerava Komisija izvesti popoln postopek pregleda za ta sektor, začenši z emisijami, sporočenimi leta 2023 za leto 2021.
19 25 See EU inventory report of 2019. 
19 25 Glej poročilo EU o evidencah iz leta 2019.
32 The EU Monitoring Mechanism Regulation and its Implementing Regulation26 require inventories to be verified for consistency with data from other sources such as data reported for the ETS, energy statistics, air pollution and fluorinated gases regulation. 
32 V uredbi EU o mehanizmu za spremljanje podnebja in njeni izvedbeni uredbi26 je določeno, da je treba preveriti skladnost evidenc s podatki iz drugih virov, kot so podatki, sporočeni za sistem trgovanja z emisijami, statistični podatki o energiji in uredba o onesnaženosti zraka in fluoriranih plinih.
The Commission reviewers check the consistency of inventories with the required data, and use additional methods to verify that the estimations are reasonable27. 
Pregledovalci iz Komisije preverjajo skladnost evidenc z zahtevanimi podatki in uporabljajo dodatne metode za preverjanje razumnosti ocen27.
33 Satellite data, together with in situ monitoring data, has potential to improve activity data, verify reported data and provide additional information on emissions and removals for sectors where estimates tend to be less certain (see Box 3). 26 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 749/2014 on structure, format, submission processes and review of information reported by Member States pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 (OJ L 203, 11.7.2014, p. 
33 S satelitskimi podatki se lahko skupaj s podatki o spremljanju na kraju samem izboljšajo podatki o dejavnostih, preverjajo sporočeni podatki in zagotavljajo dodatne 26 Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 749/2014 o strukturi, obliki, postopkih predložitve in pregledu informacij, ki jih sporočajo države članice v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št.
27 The reviewers compare the Member States’ data with data on activity (existence and size i.e. output) relative to different emission sources. 
27 Pregledovalci primerjajo podatke držav članic s podatki o dejavnostih (obstoj in velikost, tj. izložek), ki se nanašajo na različne vire emisij.
This data is taken from European and international statistics, from global industry organisations, from Eurocontrol and from EU projects aimed at collecting and modelling such activity data. 
To so podatki iz evropske in mednarodne statistike, svetovnih panožnih organizacij, Eurocontrola in projektov EU, namenjenih zbiranju in modeliranju takih podatkov o dejavnostih.
20 Box 2 Relevance and reporting of the LULUCF sector Atmospheric CO2 accumulates as carbon in vegetation and soils in terrestrial ecosystems. 
20 Okvir 2 Pomen sektorja LULUCF in poročanje o njem CO2 iz ozračja se kopiči kot ogljik v vegetaciji in tleh v kopenskih ekosistemih.
The land use, changes in land use and the forests affect the levels of atmospheric CO2. 
Na njegove ravni vplivajo raba zemljišč, spremembe v rabi zemljišč in gozdovi.
Forests remove CO2 from the atmosphere by growing additional vegetation above and below ground. 
V gozdovih se s poganjanjem dodatne vegetacije nad in pod tlemi odstranjuje CO2 iz ozračja.
However, when grasslands are ploughed, trees are harvested for energy, or a forest is replaced by grasslands or a settlement, CO2 is emitted. 
Ko pa se travišča preorjejo, drevesa posekajo za proizvodnjo energije ali pa gozd nadomestijo travišča ali naselja, pride do emisij CO2.
All these removals and emissions of atmospheric CO2 are reported in the greenhouse gas inventories, as part of the LULUCF sector. 
Vsi ti odvzemi in emisije CO2 v ozračju se sporočajo v evidencah toplogrednih plinov kot del sektorja LULUCF.
The EU reports as part of its Kyoto Protocol and UNFCCC commitments emissions and removals from changes in forest lands (e.g. planting a forest or deforestation). 
EU v okviru svojih zavez iz Kjotskega protokola in konvencije UNFCCC sporoča emisije in odvzeme, ki nastanejo zaradi sprememb gozdnih zemljišč (npr. pogozdovanja ali krčenja gozdov).
If these changes store more CO2 than they emit, the inventories present the total emissions reduced with the net removals. 
Če se s temi spremembami shrani več CO2, kot se ga odda, se v evidencah prikažejo skupne emisije, zmanjšane z neto odvzemi.