natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The objectives are relevant, but they are only specific, stated in a measurable format and timed as regards the expected outputs of the facility. 
25. cilji so ustrezni, toda specifični, izraženi v merljivi obliki in časovno opredeljeni so le v zvezi s pričakovanimi izložki sheme.
The quantified target of reaching 315 750 SMEs seems to be reasonably achievable (see paragraph 77). 
Količinsko opredeljen cilj doseči 315 750 mSP, se zdi razumno dosegljiv (glej odstavek 77).
22 Article 27(3) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 
1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
23 Thedefinitionistakenfrom the European Commission, ‘Impact assessment guidelines’, SEC(2005) 791, 15.6.2005. 
23 Definicija je iz smernic Evropske komisije za oceno učinka, SEc(2005) 791, 15.6.2005.
24 CIP Decision, Article 2. 
24 SklepoPKI,člen2.
26 CIP Decision, Article 10. 
26 Sklep o PKI, člen 10.
Compared to the MAP, the objectives of the SMEG facility were more precise. However, they are defined in a very broad manner. 
V primerjavi s programom mAP so bili cilji garancijske sheme za mSP natančnejši, vendar so opredeljeni zelo na splošno.
For instance, according to the EIP immediate objective, the loans have ‘to improve access to finance for the start-up and growth of SMEs’. 
Če na primer upoštevamo takojšen cilj PPI, morajo posojila zagotoviti izboljšanje dostopa do financiranja za začetno fazo in fazo rasti mSP.
Such an objective implies a very broad set of potential target SMEs as it can be argued that almost any borrowing by any SME will be undertaken in order to ensure the growth of a company. 
Tak cilj pomeni zelo široko bazo potencialnih ciljnih mSP, saj je mogoče za skoraj vsako posojilo kateremu koli mSP trditi, da bo namenjeno zagotavljanju rasti podjetja.
Also, the concept of innovation has been interpreted in a wide way27. 
Na široko se razlaga tudi koncept inovativnosti27.
27 Examples of innovation found in the sample: investment in new packaging and sorting technology in a warehouse and a new oven with additional functionalities in a bakery shop. 
27 Primeri inovativnosti, ugotovljeni v vzorcu: naložbe v novo tehnologijo za pakiranje in razvrščanje v skladišču, nova pečica z dodatnimi funkcijami v pekarni.
Immediate objective To improve (...) access to finance for the start-up and growth of SMEs and investment in innovation activities. The four SMEG windows Loan window — shall reduce the particular difficulties SMEs face in accessing finance either due to the perceived higher risk associated with investments in certain knowledge-related activities such as technological development, innovation and technology transfer, or due to a lack of sufficient collateral. Microcredit window — shall encourage financial institutions to play a greater role in the provision of loans of a smaller amount which would normally involve proportionately higher unit handling costs for borrowers with insufficient collateral. 
20 OkVIr 1 cIljI GarancIjske sheMe za MsP splošni cilj Spodbujati konkurenčnost podjetij, zlasti mSP. takojšnji cilj Izboljševanje dostopa do financiranja za vstop na trg in rast mSP ter za njihovo vlaganje v inovacijske dejavnosti. štirje okviri garancijske sheme za MsP Okvir za posojila – zmanjšuje posebne težave, s katerimi se srečujejo mSP pri dostopu do financ bodisi zaradi večjega tveganja, zaznanega v zvezi z nekaterimi naložbami, kot so tehnološki razvoj, inovativnost in prenos tehnologije, bodisi zaradi nezadostnih jamstev. Okvir za mikrokredite – spodbuja finančne ustanove k prevzemanju večje vloge pri posojilih manjših vrednosti, ki bi običajno zahtevala sorazmerno višje stroške obdelave na enoto za posojilojemalce z nezadostnimi jamstvi.
In addition to guarantees or counter-guarantees, financial intermediaries may receive grants to partially offset the high administrative costs inherent in microcredit financing. 
Poleg garancij ali protigarancij lahko finančni posredniki prejmejo nepovratna sredstva za delno pokritje visokih upravnih stroškov financiranja z mikrokrediti.
Equity and quasi-equity window — shall include investments which provide seed capital and/or capital in the start-up phase, as well as mezzanine financing, in order to reduce the particular difficulties which SMEs face because of their weak financial structure, and those arising from business transfers. 
Okvir za naložbe lastniškega kapitala ali navideznega lastniškega kapitala – vključuje naložbe, ki zagotavljajo semenski kapital in/ali kapital v začetni fazi, kot tudi dolžniško-lastniško financiranje, da se zmanjšajo posebne težave, s katerimi se spopadajo mSP zaradi svoje šibke finančne strukture, ter težave, ki so posledica poslovnih transferjev.
Securitisation window — shall mobilise additional debt financing for SMEs under appropriate risk-sharing arrangements with the targeted institutions. 
Okvir za listninjenje – sprosti dodatno financiranje dolgov za mSP v okviru ustreznih dogovorov delitve tveganja s ciljnimi institucijami.
Support for those transactions shall be made available upon an undertaking by the originating institutions to grant a significant part of the liquidity resulting from the mobilised capital for new SME lending in a reasonable period of time. Special Report No 4/2011 – The audit of the SME Guarantee facility 
Podpora za takšne transakcije je na voljo, če se institucija obveže, da bo v razumnem obdobju namenila precejšen delež likvidnosti, ki je posledica sproščenega kapitala, novim posojilom za mSP. Posebno poročilo št. 4/2011 — Revizija garancijske sheme za mSP
The CIP impact assessment sets an output target for the number of SMEs expected to benefit within the seven-year programme horizon. 
Ocena učinka PKI določa načrtovan izložek za število mSP, za katere se pričakuje, da bodo prejeli garancijo v obdobju sedemletnega programa.
Targets in terms of results or impact have not been set (for more details, see paragraph 64). 
Načrtovani cilji glede rezultatov ali učinka niso bili določeni (za več podrobnosti glej odstavek 64).
An estimated number of direct jobs maintained or created within five years was provided in the impact assessment. 
V oceni učinka je bilo navedeno ocenjeno število neposrednih delovnih mest, ohranjenih ali ustvarjenih v petih letih.
This does not directly relate to any of the objectives, but can be derived from the renewed Lisbon strategy. 
To se sicer ne nanaša neposredno na nobenega od ciljev, vendar se lahko izpelje iz prenovljene lizbonske strategije.
The cornerstone of efficient and effective delegation is the contractual agreement detailing the provisions for the implementation of the tasks entrusted to the specialised body. 
Temelj za učinkovit in uspešen prenos je pogodbeni sporazum, v katerem je podrobno navedeno, kako se izvajajo naloge, zaupane specializiranemu organu.
This contractual agreement should in particular detail the obligations of the specialised body and include all appropriate arrangements for ensuring that the policy objectives will be attained28. 
Ta pogodbeni sporazum bi moral zlasti podrobno navesti obveznosti specializiranega organa ter vključevati vse primerne ureditve za zagotavljanje doseganja ciljev politike28.
The EIF has systematically developed expertise in providing financial engineering products to SMEs in Europe. 
EIS je sistematično razvijal strokovno znanje na področju zagotavljanja produktov finančnega inženiringa za mSP v Evropi.
It was selected by the European Community to operate the day-to-day management of the SMEG facility at its start in 1998. Using the EIF under the successive multiannual programmes (G & E, MAP and then CIP) aims to ensure the required continuity of the management of the SMEG facility. 
Evropska skupnost ga je izbrala za tekoče upravljanje garancijske sheme za mSP na njenem začetku v letu 1998. z uporabo EIS v okviru zaporednih večletnih programov (Rast in zaposlovanje, mAP in nato PKI) se želi zagotoviti potrebno neprekinjenost upravljanja garancijske sheme za mSP.
In this context, the Court examined: ο whether the implementation of the SMEG facility was being effectively planned to avoid delays and to provide an uninterrupted support to the SMEs; and ο whether the regulatory framework29 defining the services to be provided by the EIF ensures efficient and effective management of the facility. 
Sodišče je v tem kontekstu pregledalo: ο ali je bilo načrtovanje izvajanja garancijske sheme za mSP uspešno, da se preprečijo zamude in zagotovi nemotena podpora za mSP, in ο ali uredbeni okvir29, v katerem so opredeljene storitve, ki jih mora zagotoviti EIS, zagotavlja učinkovito in uspešno upravljanje sheme.
28 In accordance with Article 43(4) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 
28 V skladu s členom 43(4) Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št.
29 For SMEG: the Fiduciary and Management Agreement and the related operational guidelines (such as the ‘Guidance on enhanced access to finance’). 
29 za garancijsko shemo za mSP: fiduciarni in upravljavski sporazum ter z njim povezane operativne smernice (kot npr. Smernice o izboljšanem dostopu do financiranja).
21 Special Report No 4/2011 – The audit of the SME Guarantee facility 
21 Posebno poročilo št. 4/2011 — Revizija garancijske sheme za mSP
Considering that the MAP covered the period from 2001 to 2006 and the CIP covers the period from 2007 to 2013, the start of the operations under the CIP should have been planned in order to preserve the continuity of the financial support. 
zaMUde PrI načrtOVanjU GarancIjske sheMe za MsP 31. glede na to, da je program mAP pokrival obdobje 2001–2006 in da program PKI pokriva obdobje 2007–2013, bi bilo treba začetek poslovanja v okviru programa PKI načrtovati tako, da bi se zagotovila neprekinjenost finančne podpore.
The FMA should have been in place at least 11 months (see paragraph 33) before the start of the CIP as this would have left sufficient time for signing the guarantee agreements between the EIF and the financial intermediaries. 
Fiduciarni in upravljavski sporazum bi moral biti vzpostavljen vsaj 11 mesecev (glej odstavek 33) pred začetkom programa PKI, da bi tako bilo na voljo dovolj časa za podpis garancijskih sporazumov med EIS in finančnimi posredniki.
The first draft version of the FMA under the CIP was dated March 2006, but was not signed until 20 September 2007, nearly nine months after the start of the CIP. Thereafter, it took almost one year until the first guarantee agreement between the EIF and a financial intermediary was signed30 (see Figure 2). 
Prvi osnutek fiduciarnega in upravljavskega sporazuma v okviru PKI je bil pripravljen marca 2006, podpisan pa je bil šele 20. septembra 2007, skoraj devet mesecev po začetku programa PKI. zatem je trajalo skoraj leto dni do podpisa prvega garancijskega sporazuma med EIS in finančnim posrednikom30 (glej sliko­2).
30 The first guarantee agreement under the CIP between a financial intermediary and the EIF was signed on 2 September 2008. 
30 Prvigarancijskisporazum v okviru PKI med finančnim posrednikom in EIS je bil podpisan 2. septembra 2008.
22 FIGURE 2 Nine months delay Twelve months delay December 2006 January 2007 September 2007 September 2008 End of MAP as per Decision No 1776/2005/EC Start of CIP as per Decision No1639/2006/EC CIP FMA signed between the EC and the EIF 1st guarantee agreement between the EIF and a FI TIMELINE OF THE MAP AND CIP LEGAL BASE Special Report No 4/2011 – The audit of the SME Guarantee facility 
22 slIka 2 Devetmesečna zamuda Dvanajstmesečna zamuda December 2006 januar 2007 September 2007 September 2008 Konec mAP po Sklepu št.1776/2005/ES začetek PKI po Sklepu št.1639/2006/ES Podpis FmA za PKI med EK in EIS Prvi garancijski sporazum med EIS in FP časOVnI VIdIk PraVne POdlaGe za MaP In PkI Posebno poročilo št. 4/2011 — Revizija garancijske sheme za mSP
The average period from the receipt of the CIP application from an intermediary up to the signature of the agreement was nearly 11 months31. 
Obdobje od prejema vloge za PKI od posrednika do podpisa sporazuma je v povprečju trajalo skoraj enajst mesecev31.
Moreover, the timeframe for the application process was considered to be unreasonable by eight out of 21 respondents to the Court’s questionnaire32. 
Poleg tega je osem od 21 anketirancev, ki so se odzvali na vprašalnik Sodišča, menilo, da je časovni razpored za prijavni postopek nerazumen32.
This delay in the selection process was mainly caused by the need to resolve technical issues raised by the EIF before the implementation of the SMEG facility, such as agreeing on a definition of and measuring the additionality of the loan guarantees (see paragraph 84). 
To zamudo v prijavnem postopku je povzročila predvsem potreba po rešitvi tehničnih vprašanj, ki jih je sprožil EIS pred izvajanjem garancijske sheme za mSP, kot sta strinjanje glede definicije in merjenje dodatnosti garancij za posojila (glej odstavek 84).
Altogether, this led to a significant time gap in the transition of the successive programmes. TO PRESERVE THE CONTINUITY OF THE SUPPORT A ‘RETROACTIVITY CLAUSE’ WAS INTRODUCED 34. 
To je skupaj privedlo do precejšnjega časovnega zamika pri prehodu med zaporednimi programi. za zaGOtaVljanje nePrekInjene POdPOre je bIla UVedena klaVzUla O retrOaktIVnOstI 34.
The continuity of the support is important for the financial intermediaries as some introduced specific loan products tailored to the needs of the SMEG facility. 
Neprekinjenost podpore je pomembna za finančne posrednike, ker so nekateri uvedli specifične možnosti posojil, prilagojene potrebam garancijske sheme za mSP.
The interruption of EU support could cause higher losses to the financial intermediaries if the product was maintained without the EU guarantee. 
Prekinitev podpore EU bi lahko povzročila večje izgube za finančne posrednike, če bi produkt ohranili brez garancije EU.
The ‘retroactivity clause’ was introduced with the aim of minimising the time gap between the two successive programmes and preserving continuity between the MAP and CIP programmes. 
Klavzula o retroaktivnosti je bila uvedena zaradi čim večjega zmanjšanja časovnega zamika med dvema zaporednima programoma in ohranjanja neprekinjenosti med mAP in PKI.
This clause enabled the financial intermediaries to retroactively include loans to be supported by the facility which they had entered into between the end of the availability period under MAP and the date on which their CIP guarantee agreement was signed. 
Ta klavzula je finančnim posrednikom omogočila, da v podporo iz sheme retroaktivno vključijo posojila, ki so jih sklenili med koncem obdobja razpoložljivosti v okviru mAP in datumom podpisa njihovega garancijskega sporazuma v okviru PKI.
As a result, the equal treatment of financial intermediaries was not ensured since the financial intermediaries which had participated in the MAP benefited from favourable treatment through the retroactive inclusion of loans. 
Posledica tega je bila, da ni bila zagotovljena enaka obravnava finančnih posrednikov, ker so imeli finančni posredniki, ki so sodelovali v programu mAP, posebne koristi zaradi retroaktivne vključitve posojil.
Loans could be retroactively included as from September 2007, whereas new financial intermediaries could only include loans once their guarantee agreement with the EIF33 had been signed. 
Posojila je bilo mogoče retroaktivno vključiti od septembra 2007 naprej, novi finančni posredniki pa so lahko posojila vključili šele po podpisu njihovega garancijskega sporazuma z EIS33 .
31 Calculated on the basis of the nine intermediaries visited, the average number of days for processing a successful application under CIP was 323. 
31 Izračun na podlagi obiska pri devetih posrednikih kaže, da je obdelava uspešne vloge v okviru PKI v povprečju trajala 323 dni.
32 Based on the questionnaire (Q6) sent to all FIs who applied under CIP. 
32 Na podlagi vprašalnika (vprašanje 6), poslanega vsem finančnim posrednikom, ki so se prijavili v okviru PKI.
33 The first guarantee agreements under the CIP were signed in September 2008. 
33 Prvi garancijski sporazumi so bili v okviru PKI podpisani septembra 2008.
23 Special Report No 4/2011 – The audit of the SME Guarantee facility 
23 Posebno poročilo št. 4/2011 — Revizija garancijske sheme za mSP
Although the retroactivity clause was designed to resolve the financial intermediaries’ funding gap between MAP and CIP, it could not always prevent a disruption of EU support to SMEs. 
Čeprav je bila klavzula o retroaktivnosti zasnovana za odpravo zamika pri financiranju finančnih posrednikov med mAP in PKI, ni mogla vedno preprečiti prekinitve podpore EU za mSP.
This was the case for two of the nine financial intermediaries visited for which the availability period under MAP ended before the start of the CIP availability period (a gap of four months). 
To se je zgodilo pri dveh od devetih obiskanih finančnih posrednikov, za katere se je obdobje razpoložljivosti v okviru mAP izteklo pred začetkom obdobja razpoložljivosti v okviru PKI (časovni zamik štirih mesecev). za UPraVljanje GarancIjske sheMe za MsP je bIl VzPOstaVljen Ustrezen UPraVljaVskI OkVIr 38. garancijsko shemo za mSP skupaj vodita Komisija in EIS34. za zagotavljanje uspešnega prenosa nalog bi morali fiduciarni in upravljavski sporazum ter ustrezne operativne smernice vsebovati: ο definicijo ukrepa, ki ga je treba izvesti, kot so specifični cilji za vsak posamezen okvir (glej okvir­1 za opis okvirov); ο upravljavsko strukturo za izvedbo nalog; in ο vzpostavitev ustrezne cenovne strukture za storitve, ki jih zagotovi EIS.
Article 3 of the FMA stipulates the tasks the EIF has to implement (see Box 2): 34 Inaccordancewith Article 53 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002. 
Člen 3 fiduciarnega in upravljavskega sporazuma določa naloge, ki jih mora izvesti EIS (glej okvir­2): 34 Vskladusčlenom53 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.
24 BOX 2 EIF MAIN TASKS FOR MANAGING THE SMEG FACILITY ο Identification, evaluation and selection of financial intermediaries ο Determination of, and agreement with, the financial intermediaries on the nature and detailed conditions of the EU guarantees ο Decisions to commit funds ο Execution, management and termination of the EU guarantees (including reporting and monitoring) Special Report No 4/2011 – The audit of the SME Guarantee facility 40. 
24 OkVIr 2 GlaVne nalOGe eIs PrI VOdenjU GarancIjske sheMe za MsP ο opredelitev, ovrednotenje in izbira finančnih posrednikov; ο določitev finančnih posrednikov in sklenitev sporazuma z njimi o naravi in podrobnih pogojih garancij EU; ο odločitve o prevzemu obveznosti za sredstva; ο izvrševanje, upravljanje in zaključitev garancij EU (vključno s poročanjem in spremljanjem). Posebno poročilo št.
For each SMEG window, operational guidelines35 were developed detailing the specific purpose, the selection of the intermediaries, the eligibility criteria, the EU guarantee and the modus operandi. 
40. za vsak okvir garancijske sheme za mSP so bile pripravljene operativne smernice35, ki so podrobno določale specifičen namen, izbiro posrednikov, pravila za upravičenost, garancijo EU in način delovanja.
The Commission issued ‘Guidance on enhanced access to finance’ on 29 October 2007 to supplement these operational guidelines, in particular the provisions of the FMA on establishing the parameters of the guarantee agreement. 41. 
Komisija je 29. oktobra 2007 izdala smernice za izboljšan dostop do financiranja, s katerimi je dopolnila operativne smernice, zlasti določbe fiduciarnega in upravljavskega sporazuma o določitvi parametrov garancijskega sporazuma.
The management structure established for the SMEG facility was appropriate as it improved the operational guidelines and the other provisions for the implementation of the tasks compared with those under the MAP, since they cover all tasks to be carried out in sufficient detail. 
41. za garancijsko shemo za mSP je bila vzpostavljena ustrezna upravljavska struktura, saj so bile v primerjavi s programom mAP izboljšane operativne smernice in druge določbe za izvajanje nalog, ki zdaj dovolj podrobno določajo vse naloge, ki jih je treba izvesti.
The fees to be paid to the EIF should be calculated so as to take into account: ο performance in achieving specific targets; ο the geographical distribution in the eligible countries; and ο the degree of novelty and complexity of the guarantee instrument. 
Pristojbine, ki jih je treba plačati EIS, bi bilo treba izračunati tako, da se upoštevajo: ο uspešnost pri doseganju specifičnih načrtovanih ciljev, ο geografska porazdelitev v državah upravičenkah in ο stopnja novosti in kompleksnosti garancijskega instrumenta.
The EIF fee scheme has been improved under CIP compared to MAP since: ο the fee structure has been split into four distinctive components better reflecting the associated workload for each task; and ο the fee entitlement is triggered by the achievement of specific results (see Table 3). 
Struktura EIS za pristojbine je bila v okviru PKI v primerjavi z mAP izboljšana: ο struktura pristojbin je bila razdeljena na štiri različne dele, ki bolje odražajo z njimi povezano delovno obremenitev za vsako nalogo, in ο pravica do pristojbine nastopi, ko se dosežejo specifični rezultati (glej tabelo­3).
35 FiduciaryandManagement Agreement, Annexes 1A to 1D. 
35 Fiduciarniinupravljavski sporazum, Priloge 1A do 1D.
25 TABLE 3 Type of incentive fee To mainly encourage Start-up Fee Setting-up the programme within 12 months Signature Fee Broad geographical coverage of the programme and use of specific windows Implementation Fee Additional volume achieved and daily operations Monitoring Fee Assurance of sound financial management OVERVIEW OF THE FOUR INCENTIVES FEES THAT CONSTITUTE EIF REMUNERATION Source: Annex 13 of the Fiduciary and Management Agreement. Special Report No 4/2011 – The audit of the SME Guarantee facility 
25 tabela 3 Vrsta pristojbine za storilnost Spodbuja predvsem Pristojbina za zagon Vzpostavitev programa v 12 mesecih Pristojbina za podpis Široka geografska pokritost programa in uporaba specifičnih okvirov Pristojbina za izvajanje Dosežen dodatni obseg in tekoče poslovanje Pristojbina za spremljanje Zagotavljanje dobrega finančnega poslovodenja PreGled štIrIh PrIstOjbIn, VezanIh na stOrIlnOst, kI PredstaVljajO PlačIlO za eIs Vir: Priloga 13 k fiduciarnemu in upravljavskemu sporazumu. Posebno poročilo št. 4/2011 — Revizija garancijske sheme za mSP
The EIF ‘signature fee’ gives a specific bonus for wide geographic coverage of intermediaries. 
Pristojbina za podpis daje EIS posebno nagrado za geografsko pokritost posrednikov.
Furthermore, fees are paid for the participation of intermediaries in countries that were not covered before and also for new intermediaries who did not participate under the previous programmes. 
Poleg tega se pristojbine plačajo za sodelovanje posrednikov v državah, ki prej niso bile pokrite, in tudi za nove posrednike, ki niso sodelovali v okviru prejšnjih programov.
Despite the incentive fee for using specific windows, the equity and quasi-equity guarantees and securitisation windows had not been utilised as at 31 December 2009. This is partly due to the financial crisis, which negatively impacted the securitisation market as a whole. 
Kljub pristojbini, vezani na storilnost, za uporabo specifičnih okvirov, okvir za garancije lastniškega kapitala in navideznega lastniškega kapitala ter okvir za listninjenje 31. decembra 2009 nista bila porabljena, deloma tudi zaradi finančne krize, ki je negativno vplivala na trg listninjenja kot celoto.