natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This shows that the cooperation arrangements put in place work well in practice. 
To kaže, da dogovori o sodelovanju, ki se izvajajo, v praksi delujejo dobro.
For the 2014‐2020 period the Member State has to prepare a major project application in which it is required to demonstrate the compliance with State aid before submission to DG REGIO, regardless of which major project decision‐making procedure it is choosing (Article 102.1 or Article 102.2 of the CPR). 
Za obdobje 20142020 morajo države članice pripraviti vlogo za velik projekt, v kateri morajo dokazati skladnost državne pomoči še pred predložitvijo GD REGIO, ne glede na to, kateri postopek odločanja o velikih projektih izbere (člen 102(1) ali člen 102(2) uredbe o skupnih določbah).
In any event, if a State aid deci‐ sion is needed, it has to be adopted before the major project can be submitted to DG REGIO. 
Če je potrebna odločitev o državni pomoči, mora ta biti v vsakem primeru sprejeta še pred predložitvijo velikega projekta GD REGIO.
In addition to the enhanced cooperation referred to by the Court, an additional preventive measure has been put in place: the possibility for the Member State and IQR experts to contact DG COMP at project preparation level in case of doubts whether the respective major project needs to be the subject of a State Aid Notification procedure to DG COMP or not. 
Poleg okrepljenega sodelovanja, ki ga omenja Sodišče, je bil uveden dodatni preventivni ukrep: možnost, da se država članica in strokovnjaki za neodvisne preglede obrnejo na GD COMP že v fazi priprave projekta, če so v dvomih glede tega, ali je treba za posamezni velik projekt uporabiti postopek priglasitve GD COMP ali ne.
The Commission therefore considers that the current preventive measures and cooperation with DG COMP put in place for the 2014 to 2020 period both at project preparation stage and at project decision‐making stage appropri‐ ately mitigate the risk mentioned by the Court in paragraph 70. 
Komisija zato meni, da sedanji preventivni ukrepi in sodelovanje z GD COMP, vzpostavljeni za obdobje 2014–2020 v fazah priprave in odločanja o projektu, ustrezno zmanjšujejo tveganja, ki jih omenja Sodišče v odstavku 70.
Common reply to paragraphs 74 to 79 The Regulation requires audit authorities to submit in their annual control reports (ACR) the principal results of the audits but not detailed information regarding the nature of errors identified in the framework of the audits of operations. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke od 74 do 79: Uredba od revizijskih organov zahteva, da v svojih letnih poročilih o nadzoru objavijo glavne ugotovitve revizij, ne pa tudi podrobnih informacij o vrsti ugotovljenih napak v okviru revizij dejavnosti.
This can however be done on a voluntary basis. 
To pa je vseeno mogoče na prostovoljni osnovi.
Moreover, based on its own reviews, the Commission considers that in some cases Audit authorities may have detected State aid errors while reporting them under a different category, such as non‐compliance with national eligibility rules, leading to a possible under‐reporting in the ACR. 
Poleg tega Komisija na podlagi lastnih pregledov meni, da so v nekaterih primerih revizijski organi morda zaznali napake pri državni pomoči, prijavili pa so jih v drugi kategoriji, na primer kot neskladnost z nacionalnimi pravili o upravičenosti, kar je privedlo do mogoče prenizke stopnje prijavljanja v letnem poročilu o nadzoru.
The Commission services are also continuously and closely working with audit authorities in order to increase their audit capacity on State aid issues through training, guidance and exchange of experience, including on the sharing of specific audit checklists which the Commission did in 2011 and again in 2015 with updated checklists. 
Službe Komisije prav tako nenehno in tesno sodelujejo z revizijskimi organi, da bi povečale njihove revizijske zmogljivosti glede vprašanj državne pomoči prek usposabljanja, usmerjanja in izmenjave izkušenj, vključno z izmenjavo posebnih revizijskih kontrolnih seznamov, ki jih je Komisija pripravila leta 2011 in posodobila leta 2015.
During the ACRs’ review, the Commission examines whether the audit authority’s opinion is solidly grounded on the basis of the results of system and operations audits. 
Komisija pri pregledu letnih poročil o nadzoru preveri, ali je mnenje revizijskega organa dobro utemeljeno z ugotovitvami iz sistemskih revizij in revizij dejavnosti.
Finally, the Commission's own verifications have found significant improvements concerning the quality of State aid check lists used by audit authorities, in line with the Court’s assessment (see paragraph 79). 
Nenazadnje so lastna preverjanja Komisije pokazala tudi na nedavne pomembne izboljšave kakovosti kontrolnih seznamov za državno pomoč, ki jih uporabljajo revizijski organi, v skladu z oceno Sodišča (glejte odstavek 79).
Reply of the Commission 80 Common reply to paragraphs 81 and 82 In recent years, the Commission services have stepped up their training support for Member States in a very con‐ siderable manner. 
Odgovori Komisije 80 Skupni odgovor na odstavka 81 in 82 V zadnjih letih so službe Komisije močno okrepile svojo podporo usposabljanju za države članice.
First, they have organised or contributed to a significant number of seminars and workshops throughout the EU (for instance, they provided training on the GBER in most Member States, including to all audit authorities, see paragraph 111). 
Najprej so organizirale oziroma prispevale k velikemu številu seminarjev in delavnic po vsej EU (izvajale so, na primer, usposabljanja o uredbi o splošnih skupinskih izjemah v večini držav članic, ki so vključevala tudi vse revizijske organe; glej odstavek 111).
In addition, they provide guidance in the form of grids, checklists or quick replies to interpretation questions submitted by aid granting or audit authorities. 
Zagotavljajo tudi smernice v obliki preglednic, kontrolnih seznamov ali hitrih odgovorov za tolmačenje vprašanj organov, ki dodeljujejo pomoč, ali revizijskih organov.
The recently adopted Commission Notice on the Notion of aid also provides further guidance on when public spending falls within, and outside, the scope of EU State aid control. 
Nedavno sprejeto Obvestilo Komisije o pojmu pomoči zagotavlja nadaljnja navodila tudi o tem, kdaj je javna poraba znotraj in zunaj nadzora državne pomoči na ravni EU.
This guidance should help public authorities and companies to identify when public support measures can be granted without needing approval under EU State aid rules. 
Ta navodila bi morala biti v pomoč javnim organom in podjetjem pri prepoznavanju tega, ali je mogoče ukrepe javne podpore odobriti, ne da bi potrebovali odobritev v skladu s pravili EU o državni pomoči.
The Commission services note the outcome of the survey conducted by the Court and the preference given, out of other possibilities, to a practical guidebook with case studies and additional training measures. 
Službe Komisije so se seznanile z izidom ankete, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče, in s prednostjo, ki jo Sodišče pred drugimi možnostmi daje praktičnemu vodniku s študijami primerov in dodatnim ukrepom usposabljanja.
In the field of State aid, the specific circumstances of a case play a significant role in its assessment. 
Na področju ocenjevanja državne pomoči pomembno vlogo igrajo posebne okoliščine primera.
DG COMP considers that the Com‐ mission’s State aid decisions constitute the best examples for useful guidance for Member States. 
GD COMP meni, da odločitve o državni pomoči Komisije predstavljajo najboljše primere uporabnih navodil za države članice.
The Commission will continue to support audit authorities and will encourage them to have increased contacts with State aid offices in the Member States. 
Komisija bo še naprej podpirala revizijske organe in jih spodbujala, da čim bolj sodelujejo z uradi za državno pomoč v državah članicah.
Common reply to paragraphs 92 to 94 The main purpose of the 2014 review of the GBER was to further clarify and simplify State aid rules and to reduce the administrative burden on Member States. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke od 92 do 94: Glavni namen revizije uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah iz leta 2014 je bil nadalje pojasniti in poenostaviti pravila o državni pomoči in zmanjšati upravno breme držav članic.
In particular, the extension of the scope of the GBER led to a consider‐ able reduction of the number of State aid measures to be notified to the Commission. 
Zlasti razširitev obsega uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah je privedla do znatnega zmanjšanja števila ukrepov državne pomoči, ki jih je treba priglasiti Komisiji.
This should also facilitate the implementation of ESIF operations. 
To naj bi tudi olajšalo izvajanje dejavnosti skladov ESI.
93 The GBER is about the need to notify. 
93 Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah je namenjena opredelitvi potrebe o priglasitvi.
Its scope of application extends to measures that were not exempted from the obligation to notify before the entry into force of the GBER 2014. 
Njeno področje uporabe je razširjeno na ukrepe, ki niso bili izvzeti iz obveznosti priglasitve pred začetkom veljavnosti uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah iz leta 2014..
Those measures could have been declared com‐ patible after an assessment by the Commission also before the entry into force of the 2014 GBER. 
Te ukrepe bi bilo mogoče po oceni Komisije razglasiti za skladne tudi pred začetkom veljavnosti uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah iz leta 2014.
96 The Commission considers that the Deggendorf principle can only be applied at the level of an individual Member State. 
96 Komisija meni, da je mogoče načelo Deggendorf uporabiti samo na ravni posamezne države članice.
Should a Member State have doubts or face difficulties with identifying whether a certain undertaking is subject to an outstanding recovery order, it can approach DG COMP in the context of mutual cooperation. 
Če je država članica v dvomih ali ima težave pri ugotavljanju, ali za določeno podjetje velja neizvedena odredba o vračilu, se lahko obrne na GD COMP v okviru medsebojnega sodelovanja.
Common reply to paragraphs 102 to 104 Member States adopted action plans that must be implemented and completed by end 2016. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke od 102 do 104: Države članice so sprejele akcijske načrte, ki jih je treba izvajati in zaključiti do konca leta 2016.
This is thoroughly monitored by the Commission services (DG REGIO and DG COMP) and can eventually lead to suspension of pay‐ ments by the Commission in case of non‐fulfilment. 
Službe Komisije to temeljito nadzirajo (GD REGIO in GD COMP) in lahko sčasoma privede do ustavitve plačil s strani Komisije, če države članice ne bi izpolnjevale svojih obveznosti.
Reply of the Commission 81 105 The Commission notes that the ex‐ante conditionalities concern the implementation of the European Structural and Investment Funds, while schemes monitored by DG COMP do not necessarily involve funding from ESI funds. 
Odgovori Komisije 81 105 Komisija ugotavlja, da se predhodna pogojenost nanaša na izvajanje programov evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov, medtem ko programi GD COMP ne vključujejo nujno sredstev iz skladov ESI.
Also, as indicated by the Court the Common Provisions Regulation stipulates that the assessment of the ex‐ante conditionality on State aid is to be based on the three sub‐criteria defined in the Annex XI of the Common Provi‐ sions Regulation. 
Prav tako, kot navaja Sodišče, uredba o skupnih določbah določa, da mora ocena predhodnega pogojevanja državne pomoči temeljiti na treh podmerilih, opredeljenih v Prilogi XI uredbe o skupnih določbah.
The compliance with State aid rules during the 2007 – 2013 period is not a criterion for fulfilment as such. 
Skladnost s pravili o državni pomoči v obdobju 2007–2013 ni merilo za samo izvedbo.
However the Commission will continue to monitor all issues related to compliance with State aid for all Member States and will take appropriate action as necessary. 
Komisija pa bo še naprej spremljala vsa vprašanja, povezana s skladnostjo s pravili o državni pomoči pri vseh državah članicah, in bo po potrebi ustrezno ukrepala.
106 The procedure to approve major projects under the 2014 – 2020 period has improved compared to the previous period (see common reply to paragraphs 69 to 71). 
106 Postopek odobritve velikih projektov je v obdobju 2014–2020 izboljšan v primerjavi s predhodnim obdobjem (glejte skupni odgovor na odstavke od 69 do 71).
The Commission services are committed to undertake further efforts to streamline the treatment of major projects co‐financed by ESI Funds which are submitted via the new IQR procedure (Article 102.1 of the CPR). 
Službe Komisije so zavezane, da si bodo še naprej prizadevale za racionalizacijo obravnave velikih projektov, ki so sofinancirani iz skladov ESI in vloge za katere je treba predložiti po novem postopku za neodvisne preglede (člen 102(1) uredbe o skupnih določbah).
In this context, DG COMP has set up internal procedures to ensure the efficient and effective treatment of consulta‐ tions on major projects under the IQR procedure. 
GD COMP je o tem pripravil notranje postopke, da bi zagotovil uspešno in učinkovito obravnavo posvetovanj o velikih projektih v postopku za neodvisne preglede.
The IQR report should contain a comprehensive analysis on the aid character of the measure and/or on its compat‐ ibility on the basis of an exemption or an existing scheme. 
Poročilo iz neodvisnega pregleda mora vsebovati celovito analizo vrste pomoči, ki jo predstavlja ukrep, in/ali njegove združljivosti na podlagi izvzetja ali obstoječega programa.
Therefore also in this new IQR procedure, State aid issues notified to DG COMP have to be cleared before the major project documents can be submitted to the Commission. 
Vprašanja državne pomoči, priglašena GD COMP, morajo biti po novem postopku za neodvisne preglede razrešena, preden je mogoče projektno dokumentacijo za velik projekt predložiti Komisiji.
107 The Commission underlines that Member States have to demonstrate that they have checked thoroughly State aid compliance when they submit a major project proposal, regardless of which related decision‐making procedure it is choosing (Article 102.1 or Article 102.2 of the CPR). 
107 Komisija poudarja, da morajo države članice ob predložitvi predloga velikega projekta dokazati, da so temeljito preverile skladnost državne pomoči, ne glede na to, kateri sorodni postopek odločanja so izbrale (člen 102(1) ali 102(2) uredbe o skupnih določbah).
Major project proposals cannot be submitted to the Commission without such a detailed assessment on State aid compliance. 
Predlogov velikih projektov ni mogoče predložiti Komisiji brez takšne podrobne ocene skladnosti državne pomoči.
Only projects with a positive IQR report can be notified to the Commission according to Article 102.1 of the CPR, which means all requirements have been complied with by the Member State, including the State aid related ones. 
Komisiji je mogoče priglasiti le projekte s pozitivnim poročilom iz neodvisnega pregleda v skladu s členom 102(1) uredbe o skupnih določbah, kar pomeni, da mora država članica izpolnjevati vse zahteve, vključno z zahtevami za državno pomoč.
The Commission services consider that the procedure can have a number of positive effects since it includes a more detailed State aid assessment by the Member State submitting the application and a more in‐depth verification of the State aid issues by the IQR team of independent experts. 
Službe Komisije menijo, da ima postopek lahko številne pozitivne učinke, saj vključuje podrobnejšo oceno državne pomoči s strani države članice, ki vlaga vlogo, in bolj poglobljeno preverjanje vprašanj državne pomoči s strani skupine strokovnjakov za neodvisne preglede.
In addition, DG COMP has put in place arrangements to enable the IQR teams to consult it on State aid issues arising in a Major Project reviewed by them. 
Poleg tega je GD COMP pripravil vse potrebno, da omogoči skupinam za neodvisne preglede, da se posvetujejo o vprašanjih državne pomoči pri velikem projektu, ki ga pregledujejo.
Reply of the Commission 82 Going further and trying to obtain legal certainty on State aid compliance through systematic formal notifications followed by a Commission State aid decision on all major projects (independently of legal requirements) would conflict with the State aid modernisation process but also with the overarching objective of simplification and reduction of administrative burden of all stakeholders, and would entail additional risk for timely implementation of ERDF/CF funded major projects. 
Odgovori Komisije 82 Nadaljnja prizadevanja za doseganje pravne varnosti glede skladnosti državne pomoči v okviru sistematičnih uradnih obvestil, ki jim sledi odločitev o državni pomoči Komisije za vse velike projekte (neodvisno od pravnih zahtev), bi bila v nasprotju s procesom posodobitve področja državne pomoči, pa tudi s splošnim ciljem poenostavitve in zmanjšanja upravnih bremen vseh deležnikov ter bi pomenila dodatno tveganje za pravočasno financiranje velikih projektov iz ESRR/KS.
114 The Commission is supporting Member States' ability to correctly interpret and/or implement the State aid rules since they are primarily responsible for taking the appropriate measures to comply with these rules. 
114 Komisija podpira zmožnost držav članic za pravilno tolmačenje in/ali izvajanje pravil o državni pomoči, saj so v prvi vrsti same odgovorne za izvajanje ustreznih ukrepov v skladu s temi pravili.
In order to address deficiencies, the Commission services (at the level of the DG REGIO and DG COMP) are imple‐ menting a common action plan on ‘Strengthening Administrative Capacity for the Management of the Funds of Member States in the Field of State Aid’. 
Službe Komisije nepravilnosti odpravljajo z izvajanjem skupnega akcijskega načrta za „krepitev upravnih zmogljivosti za upravljanje skladov držav članic na področju državne pomoči“ (na ravni GD REGIO in GD COMP).
Trainings were provided to several Member States and the target audience are all relevant bodies involved in management and implementation of ESI Funds – the Managing Authorities, the Intermediate Bodies as well as the main beneficiaries. 
Usposabljanja izvajajo v več državah članicah, ciljna skupina pa so vsi ustrezni organi, ki sodelujejo pri upravljanju in izvajanju programov skladov ESI – organi upravljanja, vmesni organi in glavni upravičenci.
Furthermore, for the 2014‐2020 financial period, the Common Provisions Regulations foresees an ex‐ante condi‐ tionality related to State aid with the purpose to ensure ex‐ante conditions for effective application of EU State aid rules. 
Poleg tega uredba o skupnih določbah za finančno obdobje 2014–2020 predvideva predhodno pogojenost državne pomoči, da bi zagotovili predhodne pogoje za učinkovito izvajanje pravil EU o državni pomoči.
For those Member States not fulfilling this ex‐ante conditionality, action plans have been set out that must be implemented and completed by end 2016. 
Za države članice, ki ne izpolnjujejo predhodne pogojenosti, so pripravljeni akcijski načrti, ki jih morajo izvesti in zaključiti do konca leta 2016.
This is thoroughly monitored by the Commission services and can even‐ tually lead to suspension of payments by the Commission in case of non‐fulfilment. 
Službe Komisije to temeljito nadzirajo in lahko sčasoma privede do ustavitve plačil s strani Komisije, če države članice ne bi izpolnjevale svojih obveznosti.
114 (a) The Commission closely and continuously works with audit authorities to improve their capacity as regards audit of State aid. 
114 (a) Komisija tesno in redno sodeluje z revizijskimi organi pri izboljševanju njihovih zmogljivosti glede revizije državne pomoči.
Beyond targeted training, actions and guidance, it provided ready‐to‐use State aid checklists to audit authorities in 2011 and updated ones in November 2015.The Commission's own verifications have lately found significant improvements concerning the quality of State aid check lists used by audit authorities, in line with the Court’s assessment. 
Leta 2011 je revizijskim organom zagotovila kontrolne sezname za državno pomoč, pripravljene za uporabo, in novembra 2015 še posodobljene različice, poleg tega pa usmerjeno usposabljanje, ukrepe in navodila. Nedavno so lastna preverjanja Komisije pokazala tudi na nedavne pomembne izboljšave kakovosti kontrolnih seznamov za državno pomoč, ki jih uporabljajo revizijski organ, v skladu z oceno Sodišča.
The Commission services’ reviews of the ACRs include an examination of the methodology for system audits and audits of operations (including check‐lists) as well as re‐performing audits already done by Member States' audit authorities. 
Pregledi letnih poročil o nadzoru služb Komisije vključujejo preverjanje metodologije za revizije sistema in revizije operacij (vključno s kontrolnimi seznami) ter ponovitve revizij, ki so jih revizijski organi držav članic že opravili.
In such audits, the Commission services have identified weaknesses and requested the audit authorities to improve their controls on State aid issues. 
Službe komisije so v takšnih revizijah ugotovile tudi pomanjkljivosti in zahtevale, da revizijski organi izboljšajo nadzor nad vprašanji državne pomoči.
114 (b) The Commission notes that both DG REGIO and DG EMPL have made use of databases to record audit findings under the 2007‐2013 financial period. 
114 (b) Komisija ugotavlja, da sta GD REGIO in GD EMPL za zbiranje revizijskih ugotovitev iz finančnega obdobja 2007–2013 uporabila zbirke podatkov.
DG COMP shared in March 2016 its experience in ex‐post mon‐ itoring of State aid schemes with DG REGIO and DG EMPL. 
GD COMP je marca 2016 delil svoje izkušnje iz naknadnega spremljanja programov državne pomoči z GD REGIO in GD EMPL.
In particular, DG COMP provided the outcome of the 2015 monitoring cycle to DGs REGIO and EMPL. 
GD COMP je izide cikla spremljanja v letu 2015 predložil zlasti GD REGIO in GD EMPL.
As regards the preventive measures undertaken, the legislative framework for the 2014‐2020 programming period introduces ex‐ante conditionalities on State aid. 
Zakonodajni okvir za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 kot preventivne ukrepe uvaja predhodno pogojenost državne pomoči.
Reply of the Commission 83 In addition, the DGs REGIO and COMP are implementing a comprehensive action plan since March 2015 for strengthening administrative capacity for the management of Structural Funds in the field of State aid. 
Odgovori Komisije 83 Poleg tega GD REGIO in GD COMP od marca 2015 izvajata celovit akcijski načrt krepitve upravnih zmogljivosti za upravljanje strukturnih skladov na področju državne pomoči.
See also Commission replies to paragraphs 57 and 61. 
Glejte tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavka 57 in 61.
114 (c) The Commission stresses that the ex‐ante obligation to notify State aid measures lies with the Member States and the decision on the major project is not a decision on compliance of the major project with State aid rules. 
114 (c) Komisija poudarja, da je obveznost predhodnega obveščanja o ukrepih državne pomoči na državah članicah in da odločitev o velikem projektu ne predstavlja tudi odločitve o skladnosti velikega projekta s pravili o državni pomoči.
DG COMP was consulted in formal inter‐service consultations by DG REGIO on major projects decisions already before the end of 2012, although not systematically. 
GD COMP se je v okviru formalnih posvetovanj med službami z GD REGIO o odločitvah za velike projekte posvetoval že pred koncem leta 2012, vendar ne sistematično.
Appropriate checks and balances have been introduced, in the major projects information requirements and in both decision‐making procedures concerning major projects (Article 102.1 and Article 102.2 of the CPR), as preven‐ tive measures to avoid that State Aid non‐compliant decisions are taken on major projects in 2014‐2020. 
Pri zahtevkih za podatke o velikih projektih in v obeh postopkih odločanja glede velikih projektov (člen 102(1) in člen 102(2) uredbe o skupnih določbah) je bil kot preventivni ukrep uveden ustrezen sistem zavor in ravnotežij, ki v obdobju 2014–2020 preprečuje sprejemanje odločitev o velikih projektih, ki niso skladne s pravili o državni pomoči.