natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(9) Article 128(2)(e) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities requires that the assistant has a thorough knowledge of one of the languages of the Community and a satisfactory knowledge of another Community language to the extent necessary for the performance of his duties. 
(9) Člen 128(2)(e) Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti zahteva, da ima pomočnik temeljito znanje enega od jezikov Skupnosti in zadovoljivo znanje drugega jezika Skupnosti v obsegu, ki omogoča opravljanje dela.
EN C 344/210 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Performance of the ex-ante verification of recruitment procedures 9.14. Articles 47 and 48 of the implementing rules of the Financial Regulation provide that every act implementing the budget must be subject to an ex-ante verification. 
SL C 344/210 Uradni list Evropske unije 12.11.2012 U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Izvajanje predhodnega preverjanja postopkov zaposlovanja 9.14 Člena 47 in 48 izvedbenih pravil finančne uredbe določata, da je treba vsako dejavnost izvrševanja proračuna predhodno preveriti.
In 9 out of the 10 procedures for recruiting APAs audited, there were no documents on file evidencing the ex-ante checks of recruitment documents performed. 
Pri devetih od 10 revidiranih postopkov zaposlovanja akreditiranih parlamentarnih pomočnikov v spisih ni bilo dokumentov, ki bi dokazovali, da so bili opra­ vljeni predhodni pregledi dokumentov, zahtevanih pri zaposlo­ vanju.
Best practice is to ensure that all formal documentation is duly filled in and archived for internal control purposes. 
Najboljša praksa je zagotoviti, da so vsi formalni doku­ menti ustrezno izpolnjeni in arhivirani za namene notranje kontrole.
Theauditexamined10procurementprocedures.In two cases, relating to the maintenance of buildings and to printing services, there were weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria. 
V dveh primerih, ki sta se nanašala na vzdrže­ vanje stavb in tiskarske storitve, so obstajale slabosti pri uporabi izbirnih meril in meril za dodelitev.
In the procedure regarding the maintenance of buildings, tenderers did not receive detailed information on the method applied for the evaluation of their bids. 
9.16 V postopku za vzdrževanje zgradb ponudniki niso prejeli podrobnih informacij o metodi, uporabljeni za vredno­ tenje njihovih ponudb.
For one lot valued at 750 000 euro over four years (out of a total contract value of 23 141 740 euro), the estimated value of materials to use, which amounted to 40 % of the value of the lot, was not disclosed in the tender documentation. 
Pri enem sklopu, ki je bil ocenjen na 750 000 EUR v štirih letih (pri skupni vrednosti naročila 23 141 740 EUR), v razpisni dokumentaciji ni bila razkrita ocenjena vrednost materialov za uporabo, ki je znašala 40 % vrednosti sklopa.
Tenderers were only asked to submit a gross profit margin rate on materials and were thus prevented from making a more competitive bid by combining optimally the components of their financial offer. 
Od ponudnikov so zahtevali le, naj predložijo stopnjo bruto dobička za materiale, zato ti niso mogli pripra­ viti konkurenčnejše ponudbe z optimalno kombinacijo sestavnih delov svoje finančne ponudbe.
9.17. Inthecaseofonenegotiatedprocedurerelatingto printing services, the specification for the location of the services to be provided was not drafted in a clear and trans­ parent manner. 
9.17 Vprimeruenegapostopkaspogajanji,kisejenanašal na tiskarske storitve, specifikacija kraja storitev, ki bi jih bilo treba zagotoviti, ni bila sestavljena jasno in pregledno.
In addition, the potential tenderers consulted were all based in Luxembourg, thereby restricting cross border competition. 
Poleg tega so imeli vsi ponudniki, s katerimi so potekali pogovori, sedež v Luksemburgu, kar je omejevalo čezmejno konkurenco.
Out of the 11 potential tenderers consulted, only the previous contractor submitted a bid and was awarded the contract for 60000 euro over four years. 
Od 11 potencialnih ponudnikov, s katerimi so potekali pogo­ vori, je ponudbo predložil le prejšnji pogodbenik in dodeljeno mu je bilo naročilo v vrednosti 60 000 EUR v štirih letih.
Furthermore, compliance with selection criteria was not checked before entering into the negotiation, in contradiction with the provisions of Article 122(3) of the implementing rules of the Financial Regulation. 
Poleg tega pred začetkom pogajanj v nasprotju z določbami člena 122(3) izvedbenih pravil finančne uredbe ni bila prever­ jena skladnost z izbirnimi merili.
R E P L Y O F T H E E U R O P E AN P AR L I AM E N T 9.14. Substantial improvements are currently being made to the ex-ante verifications carried out by the unit with responsibility for recruitment (thorough revision of checklists and introduction of cross-checking). 
O D G O V O R I P AR L AM E N T A 9.14 Oddelek, pristojen za zaposlovanje, trenutno uvaja izboljšave predhodnega preverjanja (prenovitev kontrolnih seznamov preverjanja in izvajanje navzkrižnega preverjanja).
The underlying documentation for those verifications is now being kept. 
Podporna dokumentacija pred­ hodnih preverjanj se bo zdaj ustrezno hranila.
R E P L Y O F T H E E U R O P E AN P AR L I AM E N T 9.16. In this particular lot Parliament has included the materials as an invariable sum in order to individualise and weigh in a trans­ parent way the real cost of the works. 
O D G O V O R I P AR L AM E N T A 9.16 V tem posebnem sklopu je Parlament predstavil material kot nespremenljiv znesek, da bi omogočil individualizacijo in na pregleden način ocenil dejanske stroške del.
R E P L Y O F T H E E U R O P E AN P AR L I AM E N T 9.17. Parliament agrees with the Court’s observations and will take them into account when preparing the next procedure. 
O D G O V O R I P AR L AM E N T A 9.17 Parlament se strinja z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča in jih bo upošteval pri pripravi naslednjega postopka.
However, Parliament underlines that for this particular small value contract the services to be provided were essentially local. 
Vendar pa poudarja, da so bile za to pogodbo z izredno majhno vrednostjo storitve predvsem lokalne.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/211 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S European Council and Council Procurement 9.18. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/211 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Evropski svet in Svet Javna naročila 9.18 Prirevizijijebilopregledanihpetpostopkovzajavna naročila.
Theauditexaminedfiveprocurementprocedures.In two cases relating to cleaning services (contract value of 16 214 000 euro over four years) and to the purchase of service clothing and shoes (contract value of 344 000 euro over four years) if tenderers did not propose a price for certain items of the tender, tender specifications enabled the Council to estimate a price based on the average price submitted for this item by the other tenderers. 
V dveh primerih, ki sta se nanašala na storitve čiščenja (vrednost naročila 16 214 000 EUR v štirih letih) ter na nakup delovnih oblačil in obutve (vrednost naročila 344 000 EUR v štirih letih), so Svetu pri ponudnikih, ki niso predložili cen določenih postavk iz javnega razpisa, razpisne specifikacije omogočile oceniti cene na podlagi povprečnih cen za te postavke, ki so jih predložili drugi ponudniki.
The Council thus modifies the value of the tender in a way which is not laid down in the Financial Regulation. 
To pomeni, da Svet spreminja vrednost javnega razpisa na način, ki ni določen v finančni uredbi.
R E P L Y O F T H E C O U N C IL 9.18. The Council observes first, that there has been no violation of the Financial Regulation, as Article 148(3) of the Regulation laying down the implementation rules targets contacts that lead to modification of the value of the tender. 
O DG O V O R S V E T A 9.18 Svet ugotavlja, da, prvič, ni bilo kršitve finančne uredbe, saj se člen 148(3) izvedbenih pravil nanaša na stike, ki privedejo do spremembe vrednosti ponudbe.
No such contacts have taken place in the procedures examined by the Court. 
V postopkih, ki jih je obravnavalo Sodišče, takšnih stikov ni bilo.
The Council fully acknowledges that this provision does not allow an institution to ask for prices which have been overlooked by a tenderer. 
Svet v celoti priznava, da ta določba ne omogoča instituciji, da zaprosi za cene, ki jih je ponudnik spre­ gledal.
In order not to exclude the candidate and to preserve the competition for complex tenders which cover an array of products or services, the tender documents explicitly mention that in the event of a price omission the evaluation committee may apply itself (barring any contact with the tenderers) a theoretical average price. 
Da pa kandidata ne bi izključili in da bi ohranili konkurenco za kompleksne ponudbe, ki pokrivajo paleto izdelkov oziroma storitev, je v razpisni dokumentaciji izrecno omenjeno, da lahko v primeru opustitve navedbe cene odbor za oceno ponudb sam (brez kakršnega koli stika s ponudniki) uporabi teoretično povprečno ceno.
In order to not distort the intention of the tenderer this method is only used to correct a limited number of omissions. 
Da ne bi napačno prikazali namere ponudnika, se ta metoda uporablja le za popravek omejenega števila opustitev navedbe cene.
It was only used in one of the cases identified by the Court for a minor item which was lacking in a list of 81 prices (corresponding with a financial impact of 0,67 % of the bid). 
Uporabljena je bila le v enem izmed primerov, ki jih je opredelilo Sodišče, za manjši izdelek, ki ga ni bilo na seznamu 81 cen (skladno s finančnim učinkom 0,67 % ponudbe).
The General Secretariat of the Council considers that this approach respects fully the spirit and the principles of the Financial Regulation: transparency, proportionality and non-discrimination. 
Generalni sekretariat Sveta meni, da je ta pristop povsem v skladu z duhom in načeli finančne uredbe, tj. preglednostjo, sorazmernostjo in nediskriminacijo.
Coupled with a measured and cautious implementation, it represents a safeguard for adequate competition and sound financial management. 
Skupaj s preudarnim in previdnim izvajanjem pred­ stavlja jamstvo za ustrezno konkurenco in dobro finančno poslovode­ nje.
An automatic update of the amounts of the allowances of like nature from the Belgian State is being implemented by the Commission in SYSPER2/Rights (the information system for the management of individual entitlements) since April 2012. 
O D G O VO R K O M I S I JE 9.19 Komisija od aprila 2012 samodejno posodablja zneske podobnih dodatkov, ki jih izplačuje Belgija, v sistemu SYSPER2/pra­ vice (informacijski sistem za upravljanje posameznih pravic).
This auto­ matism will significantly decrease the risk of errors as the update will not be done manually any more. 
S tem samodejnim postopkom se bo bistveno zmanjšalo tveganje pojavljanja napak, saj se zneski ne bodo več posodabljali ročno.
The other Member States will follow. 
Belgiji bodo sledile še ostale države članice.
Additionaly, a new module will be put in place in the front office of SYSPER2/Rights. Staff will be asked to declare the professional activity of their spouse. 
Poleg tega bo vzpostavljen nov modul v zunanjem poslovanju sistema SYSPER2/pravice. Osebje bo zaprošeno, naj navede poklicno dejav­ nost zakonca.
Commission Calculation and payment of social allowances to staff members 9.19. In 15 cases out of 28 audited, the information available in the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) on the personal and family situation of the staff members, was not up-to-date. 
Komisija Izračunavanje in izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov uslužbencem 9.19 V 15 od 28 revidiranih primerov Urad za vodenje in plačevanje posameznih pravic (PMO) ni imel posodobljenih informacij o osebnih in družinskih razmerah uslužbencev.
In six of these cases, it led to incorrect payments because the amounts deducted did not reflect the latest applicable value of benefits paid by national authorities (10). _____________ (10) Article 67(2) of the Staff Regulations requires allowances of like nature received from other sources to be deducted from those paid by the institutions. 
V šestih od teh primerov je to privedlo do nepravilnih plačil, ker odšteti zneski niso odražali najnovejše veljavne vrednosti prejemkov, ki jih izplačujejo nacionalni organi (10). _____________ (10) Člen 67(2) kadrovskih predpisov zahteva, da se podobni dodatki, prejeti iz drugih virov, odštejejo od dodatkov, ki jih izplačajo institucije.
In three of them for the provision of security services (contract value of 46000000 euro over four years), training services (contract value of 860 000 euro over four years) and maintenance services (contract value of 11 000 000 euro over four years), which were concluded under the automatic award procedure, weaknesses were noted: the application of award criteria at the selection stage, the use of similar criteria several times during the evaluation process and inconsistencies in the definition and evaluation of the selection criteria. 
V treh, v katerih so bila naročila oddana po avtomatskem postopku in so se nanašali na varnostne storitve (vrednost naročila 46 000 000 EUR v štirih letih), storitve usposabljanja (vrednost naročila 860 000 EUR v štirih letih) in storitve vzdrževanja (vrednost naročila 11 000 000 EUR v štirih letih), so bile ugotovljene slabosti: pri uporabi meril za dodelitev v fazi izbora, pri večkratni uporabi podobnih meril v procesu vrednotenja ter nedosled­ nosti pri opredelitvi in vrednotenju izbirnih meril.
9.21. OILalsoorganisedanopenprocurementprocedure to provide assistance and consultancy in technical, architectural and financial fields. 
9.21 OILjetudiorganiziralodprtpostopekzajavnonaro­ čilo za zagotovitev pomoči in svetovanja na tehničnem, arhi­ tekturnem in finančnem področju.
The total value of the market amounts to 3 124 000 euro over four years. 
Skupna vrednost naročila znaša 3 124 000 EUR v štirih letih.
The type of contract chosen is a multiple framework contract in cascade signed with three companies. 
Izbrana vrsta naročila je večkratno kaskadno okvirno naročilo, podpisano s tremi podjetji.
This means that, if the company ranked first in the cascade cannot provide the requested service, the company ranked second in the cascade is invited to submit a bid, and so on. 
To pomeni, da je v primeru, ko prvouvrščeno podjetje ne more zagotoviti zahtevane storitve, drugouvrščeno podjetje povabljeno k oddaji ponudbe in tako naprej.
The company ranked second in the cascade should have been eliminated at the stage of examination of selection criteria as it did not fulfil the requirement relating to previous experience in the field of the contract. Court of Auditors 9.22. 
Ponudbo podjetja, ki je bilo uvrščeno kot drugo, bi bilo treba izločiti v fazi pregledovanja izpolnjevanja izbirnih meril, ker ni izpolnjevalo zahteve o prejšnjih izkušnjah s področja, na katero se je nana­ šalo naročilo.
The external auditor’s report (11) states that, in the auditors' opinion, ‘the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the European Court of Auditors as of 31 December 2011, and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002, Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the said Council Regulation and the Accounting Rules of the European Union’. 
Računsko sodišče 9.22 V poročilu zunanjega revizorja (11) je navedeno, da so po mnenju revizorjev „računovodski izkazi resničen in pošten prikaz finančnega stanja Evropskega računskega sodišča na dan 31. decembra 2011 ter njegovega poslovnega izida in denarnih tokov za tedaj končano leto v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002, Uredbo Komi­ sije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje navedene uredbe ter v skladu z računovodskimi pravili Evropske unije“.
The report will be published in the Official Journal. of the European Union 12.11.2012 R E P L Y O F T H E C O M M IS S IO N 9.20. All procurement procedures analysed by the Court were launched at the end of 2010 or the beginning of 2011. 
Poročilo bo objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije. O D G O VO R K O M I S I JE 9.20 Vsi postopki javnega naročanja, ki jih je analiziralo Sodišče, so se začeli konec leta 2010 ali začetek leta 2011.
In mid-2011, OIL revised its approach with regards to calls for tender procedures with a view to streamlining all aspects of the tender specifications, such as reducing the number of selection and award criteria and defining them more precisely. 
Sredi leta 2011 je OIL spremenil svoj pristop v zvezi s postopki povabil k oddaji ponudb, da bi racionaliziral vse vidike tehničnih specifikacij, in sicer je zmanjšal število izbirnih meril in meril za dodelitev naročila ter jih natančneje opredelil.
For all new procurement procedures launched since then, most of the formal weaknesses high­ lighted by the Court have been resolved (for the ones still existing at the time of the audit of the Court, action has now been taken to eliminate them). 
Pri vseh novih postopkih javnega naročanja, ki so se začeli od takrat, je bila odpravljena večina formalnih slabosti, ki jih je izpostavilo Sodišče (kar zadeva slabosti, ki so v času revizije Sodišča še vedno obstajale, so bili sprejeti ukrepi o njihovi odpravi).
R E P L Y O F T H E C O M M IS S IO N 9.21. In the course of the tender procedure, OIL should have requested from the concerned bidder a more recent justification of experience in the field of the contract. 
O D G O VO R K O M I S I JE 9.21 Med razpisnim postopkom bi moral OIL od zadevnega ponudnika zahtevati novejša dokazila o izkušnjah iz področja razpisa.
If this information could not be provided, and only then, the bidder should have been eliminated. 
Ponudnika bi bilo treba izločiti iz postopka samo v primeru, če teh informacij ne bi mogel predložiti.
However, it should be noted that since the signature of the contract on the 4 March 2011 and until end of May 2012, OIL signed only one purchase order of a value of 1 116 euro with the concerned company. _____________ (11) See the external auditor’s report on the financial statements referred to in paragraph 9.8. 
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da je od podpisa pogodbe 4. marca 2011 do konca maja 2012 OIL z zadevnim podjetjem podpisal samo eno nakupno naročilo v vrednosti 1 116 EUR. _____________ (11) Glej poročilo zunanjega revizorja o računovodskih izkazih iz odstavka 9.8. SL
EN Anexaminationoftheproceduresfortheextension and modification of contracts of temporary and contract staff found that the provisions included in the internal rules and in the guidelines applicable to the selection and grading of these staff did not consistently take into account professional experience acquired by these staff. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/213 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor Sklepanje pogodb z začasnimi in pogodbenimi uslužbenci 9.23 Pregledpostopkovzapodaljševanjeinspremembo pogodb začasnih in pogodbenih uslužbencev je pokazal, da pri določbah notranjih pravil in smernic, ki se uporabljajo za izbor teh uslužbencev in njihovo razvrščanje v razrede, niso bile dosledno upoštevane njihove poklicne izkušnje.
In addition, one of the guidelines applied had no date of entry into force. 
Poleg tega je bila ena od smernic, ki so se uporabljale, brez datuma začetka veljavnosti.
These inconsistencies increase the risk of error in the grading of temporary staff employed under the provisions of Article 2(b) of the CEOS. RE P L Y O F T H E E E S C 9.23. 
Te nedoslednosti povečujejo tveganje napake pri razvrščanju v razrede začasnih uslužbencev, zapo­ slenih v skladu z določbami člena 2(b) Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti.
The current guidelines for the grading of temporary agents (DRHF 001/08) were adopted 14 January 2008. 
O D G O V O R E KO N O M S K O - S O C I A L N E G A O D B O R A 9.23 Sedanje smernice za razvrščanje v razrede začasnih usluž­ bencev (DRHF 001/08) so bile sprejete 14. januarja 2008.
However, since July 2010, grading for all temporary 2b agents has remained at AD5 level, initially due to a lack of available grades at a higher level, but later applied as a matter of policy. 
Vendar pa je vse od julija 2010 razvrščanje v razrede vseh začasnih usluž­ bencev 2b ostalo na ravni AD 5, kar je bilo prvotno posledica pomanjkanja razpoložljivih višjih razredov, pozneje pa se je izvajalo kot politično načelo.
The guidelines have indeed not been updated to reflect this change in policy and the EESC will adjust the provisions of its current regulation/guidelines concerning the grading of temporary staff employed under the provisions of Article 2(b) of the CEOS, in order to ensure a consistent and trans­ parent application. 
Smernice res niso bile posodobljene, da bi odra­ žale to spremembo politike, in EESO bo prilagodil določbe svoje dosedanje ureditve oz. smernic glede razvrščanja v razrede začasnih uslužbencev, zaposlenih na podlagi določb člena 2(b) pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Skupnosti, da se zagotovi dosledno in pregledno izvajanje.
The Court will be informed of the date of imple­ mentation of the future decision, which is expected by the end of autumn 2012. 
Sodišče bo obveščeno o datumu izvajanja prihodnje odločitve, ki je predvidena do konca jeseni 2012.
The undated document referred to was an internal working document intended solely to provide practical guidance for engagement procedures related to both contractual and temporary agents, which will be integrated in the updated guidelines as mentioned above. 
Navedeni nedatiran dokument je bil notranji delovni dokument, namenjen zgolj zagotavljanju praktične usmeritve pri postopkih zapo­ slovanja v zvezi s pogodbenimi uslužbenci in začasnimi uslužbenci, ki bo vključen v posodobljene smernice, kot je navedeno zgoraj.
RE P L Y O F T H E E E S C 9.24. In the case referred to by the Court, the staff member was indeed re-graded to the basic grade of his career at the occasion of his contract extension, six months after the initial contract entered into force, due to the unavailability of a post with the initial grade at that moment. 
O D G O V O R E KO N O M S K O - S O C I A L N E G A O D B O R A 9.24 V zadevi, na katero se sklicuje Sodišče, je bil uslužbenec Odbora pri podaljšanju pogodbe, 6 mesecev po tem, ko je začela veljati njegova prvotna pogodba, res naknadno uvrščen v osnovni karierni naziv, ker delovno mesto s prvotnim kariernim nazivom takrat ni bilo na voljo.
The Committee makes constant effort to improve the forecast of the utilisation of posts. 
Odbor si nenehno prizadeva izboljšati napovedi glede zapolnitve delovnih mest.
However, the margins are limited for smaller institutions, as the effect of only a few unforeseen movements in staff can have significant repercussions and therefore be difficult to counterbalance. 
Vendar pa je manevrski prostor v manjših institucijah omejen, saj ima lahko zgolj nekaj nepredvidenih sprememb med osebjem znatne posledice in je zato težko zagotoviti ponovno urav­ noteženost.
This situation shows a weakness in the planning of the allocation of available posts among the various categories of staff. EN C 344/214 Official Journal T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S European External Action Service Payment of social allowances and benefits to staff members 9.25. 
SL C 344/214 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 12.11.2012 Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje Izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov in prejemkov uslužbencem 9.25 V šestih od 17 revidiranih primerov službe Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) niso imele posodobljenih informacij o osebnih in družinskih razmerah uslužbencev.