natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A sample of 32 projects adopted between 2000 and 2003 (16 environment and 16 transport) covering six beneficiary countries was examined. 
Preučen je bil vzorec 32 projektov, ki so bili sprejeti med letoma 2000 in 2003 (16 okoljskih in 16 prometnih) in so zajemali šest držav upravičenk.
Sixteen projects were visited on the spot (eight environment and eight transport) in the Czech Republic, Poland, Latvia and Romania. 
16 projektov je bilo obiskanih na kraju samem (osem okoljskih in osem prometnih) na Češkem, Poljskem, v Latviji in Romuniji.
They concern the abovementioned countries plus Hungary and Bulgaria. 
Ti zadevajo zgoraj omenjene države ter Madžarsko in Bolgarijo.
File reviews and interviews were carried out both at the Commission headquarters and Commission delegations. 
Pregledi dosjejev in pogovori so bili izvedeni tako v sedežu Komisije kot v njenih delegacijah.
In the candidate countries, meetings were held with the Ministries of Environment and Transport, regional and local authorities, as well as with final beneficiaries. 
V državah kandidatkah so potekali sestanki z ministrstvi za okolje in promet, regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi ter s končnimi upravičenci.
In addition, the Court carried out a survey by sending questionnaires to 155 project managers and bodies responsible for day-to-day management of projects8 in the four countries visited, in order to collect opinions on the most common problems encountered during ISPA implementation. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče opravilo anketo, pri kateri je poslalo vprašalnike 155 vodjem projektom in organom, odgovornim za vsakodnevno upravljanje projektov8 v štirih obiskanih državah, da bi zbralo mnenja o najobičajnejših težavah, ki so se pojavljale pri izvajanju ISPA.
The Court received 145 answers9 (93 % response rate). 
Sodišče je prejelo 145 odgovorov9 (delež odgovorov je 93 %).
Moreover, the Court obtained advice from experts in environment and transport projects from international financial institutions. 
Poleg tega so Sodišču svetovali strokovnjaki za okoljske in prometne projekte iz mednarodnih finančnih ustanov.
7 The Court’s Special Report No 5/2003 concerning Phare and ISPA funding of environmental projects in the candidate countries (OJ C 167, 17.7.2003, p. 
5/2003 o financiranju PHARE in ISPA okoljskih projektov v državah kandidatkah (UL C 167, 17.7.2003, str. 1), Posebno poročilo št.
1), Special Report No 15/2000 on the Cohesion Fund (OJ C 279, 2.1.2000, p. 
15/2000 o kohezijskem skladu (UL C 279, 2.1.2000, str. 1) in Posebno poročilo št.
1) and Special Report No 6/2005 on the trans-European network for transport (TEN-T) (OJ C 94, 21.4.2006, p. 
6/2005 o vseevropskem prometnem omrežju (TEN-T) (UL C 94, 21.4.2006, str.
8 The project managers represented 42 % of ISPA projects in the environment and transport sectors. 
8 Vodje projektov so predstavljali 42 % projektov ISPA v okoljskem in v prometnem sektorju.
9 For technical reasons such as incorrect completion of the questionnaire or incomplete reply, 127 replies were usable (82 %). Special Report No 12/2008 — The Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), 2000–06 
9 Zaradi tehničnih razlogov, kot je nepravilno izpolnjen vprašalnik ali pomanjkljiv odgovor, je bilo mogoče uporabiti 127 odgovorov (82 %). Posebno poročilo št. 12/2008 – Instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA) 2000–2006
GENERAL FRAMEWORK AND AUDIT CRITERIA 13. 
SPLOŠNI OKVIR IN REVIZIJSKA MERILA 13.
National ISPA strategies for the environment and transport sectors were prepared by each beneficiary country at the request of the Commission. 
Vsaka država upravičenka je na zahtevo Komisije pripravila nacionalno strategijo ISPA za okoljski in prometni sektor.
Their purpose was to define the priority objectives by identifying sector and sub-sector priorities and geographical priorities such as transport bottlenecks or environmental black spots, and to identify the resources needed. 
Namen teh strategij je bil, da se ugotovijo sektorske in podsektorske prednostne naloge ter geografske prednostne naloge, kot so ozka grla v prometu ali okoljske črne točke, ter na podlagi tega opredelijo prednostni cilji in se ugotovi, kakšna sredstva so potrebna.
The national ISPA strategies should also provide the framework for project identification and set out the criteria to be used to select and appraise proposed projects (see Annex I). 
Nacionalne strategije ISPA naj bi zagotovile tudi okvir za opredelitev projektov in določile merila za izbiranje in ocenjevanje predlaganih projektov (glej Prilogo I).
Candidate countries submitted an application to the Commission which had to contain, inter alia, the following elements10: (a) the timetable for implementation of the works; (b) a cost–benefit analysis; (c) the financial plan, including financing sources other than ISPA. 
Države kandidatke so Komisiji predložile vlogo, ki je med drugim morala vsebovati naslednje sestavne dele10: (a) časovni razpored za izvedbo del; (b) analizo stroškov in koristi; (c) finančni načrt, vključno z drugimi viri kot ISPA.
The Court analysed the strategy documentation, and the preparation of ISPA projects, checking whether: (a) the national sectoral strategies contained an assessment of sectoral needs in the fields of environment and transport designed to catch up with EU environmental standards and upgrade and expand links with trans-European transport networks; (b) the Commission developed on time manuals and guidelines to enable candidate countries to submit proposals containing all the relevant information. 
Sodišče je analiziralo dokumentacijo, povezano s strategijo, in pripravo projektov ISPA ter preverilo, ali: (a) so nacionalne sektorske strategije vsebovale oceno sektorskih potreb na področjih okolja in prometa, z namenom dohitevanja okoljskih standardov EU ter posodobitve in razširitve povezav z vseevropskimi prometnimi omrežji; (b) je Komisija pravočasno pripravila priročnike in smernice ter tako omogočila državam članicam, da predložijo predloge, ki vsebujejo vse relevantne informacije.
10 Article 7(3)(a) of and Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999. 
10 Člen 7(3)(a) in Priloga I Uredbe (ES) št. 1267/1999.
Special Report No 12/2008 — The Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), 2000–06 WELL TARGETED ISPA STRATEGIES 16. 
12/2008 – Instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA) 2000–2006 DOBRA CILJNA USMERJENOST STRATEGIJ ISPA 16.
The Commission’s framework documents for the environment and transport sectors proved to be effective in setting out the key criteria for the preparation of national ISPA strategies which included general priorities and identified projects to be implemented with ISPA support (see Textbox 1). 
Okvirni dokumenti Komisije za okoljski in prometni sektor so se izkazali za uspešne pri določanju ključnih meril za pripravo nacionalnih strategij ISPA, v katerih so bile zajete tudi splošne prednostne naloge in opredeljeni projekti, ki se izvedejo s podporo ISPA (glej okvir 1).
In the cases where shortcomings were identified, the Commission provided support in order to address these weaknesses (see Textbox 2). 
V primerih, kjer so bile ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti, je Komisija zagotovila podporo za odpravljanje teh slabosti (glej okvir 2).
14 TEXTBOX 1 TEXTBOX 2 In the case of Latvia, in the environment sector, the main focus for ISPA was to concentrate on projects which enabled the country to comply with the requirements of Community environmental law and with the objectives of the accession partnership. 
14 OKVIR 1 OKVIR 2 V primeru Latvije se je ISPA v okoljskem sektorju zlasti osredotočala na projekte, ki so državi omogočili izpolnjevati zahteve okoljskega prava Skupnosti in dosegati cilje partnerstva za pristop.
The strategy identifies and selects projects to be proposed for financing under ISPA that are consistent with the abovementioned criteria. 
V strategiji so opredeljeni in izbrani projekti, ki so skladni z omenjenimi merili in se predlagajo za financiranje v okviru instrumenta ISPA.
The selection of ISPA projects was based on the government guidelines, which took into consideration assumptions of environmental policy. 
Izbira projektov ISPA je temeljila na vladnih smernicah, ki so upoštevale predpostavke okoljske politike.
In Romania, the updated 2003 version of the national transport strategy did not receive unreserved consent from the Commission due to several shortcomings. 
V Romuniji posodobljena različica nacionalne prometne strategije iz leta 2003 zaradi več pomanjkljivosti ni dobila soglasja Komisije brez pridržkov.
In order to address these shortcomings, the Commission decided to grant a technical assistance project aimed at drafting a general transport master plan. Special Report No 12/2008 — The Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), 2000–06 
Komisija se je odločila, da bo za odpravljanje teh pomanjkljivosti odobrila donacijo za projekt tehnične pomoči, namenjen pripravi osnutka glavnega načrta za splošni promet. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2008 – Instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA) 2000–2006
TEXTBOX 3 TEXTBOX 4 18. Even though in some cases it was not possible to explain the ranking of investment projects11, an examination of the strategies of the four countries visited has enabled the Court to conclude that, in general, national sectoral ISPA strategies clearly identified the needs in each country, also taking into consideration the existing national planning documents (see Textbox 3). 
Čeprav v nekaterih primerih ni bilo mogoče pojasniti razvrstitve naložbenih projektov11, je pregled strategij štirih obiskanih držav Sodišču omogočil priti do zaključka, da so bile v nacionalnih sektorskih strategijah ISPA v vsaki državi potrebe na splošno jasno opredeljene, v njih pa so bili upoštevani tudi obstoječi nacionalni dokumenti načrtovanja (glej okvir 3).
National ISPA strategies acted as a tool in the selection of ISPA projects, linking objectives and priorities to specific project proposals. 
Nacionalne strategije ISPA so bile uporabljene kot orodje za izbiro projektov ISPA tako, da so povezale cilje in prednostne naloge s specifičnimi predlogi projektov.
In some cases the national ISPA strategies were a development of existing national strategies that had already taken into consideration the need to adopt the acquis communautaire in the field of the environment (see Textbox 4). 
V nekaterih primerih so se nacionalne strategije ISPA razvile iz obstoječih nacionalnih strategij, v katerih je bila že upoštevana potreba po sprejetju pravnega reda Skupnosti na področju okolja (glej okvir 4).
11 This has been pointed out also in the Court’s Special Report No 5/2003 (shortcomings in strategies, paragraphs 18 to 20). 
11 Na to je opozorilo tudi Posebno poročilo Sodišča št. 5/2003 (pomanjkljivosti v strategijah, odstavki 18 do 20).
15 Action to protect the environment in the Baltic region was initiated by the Polish government at the beginning of the 1990s in cooperation with other countries. 
15 Poljska vlada je v začetku1990-ih let v sodelovanju z drugimi državami sprožila ukrepe za varstvo okolja v baltski regiji.
The region of Krakow was already identified in the Helsinki Con-vention12 as one of the hot spots for the protection of the Baltic Sea, as this area, even though far from the coast, contains a high density of industries discharging waste into the Vistula River, which flows into the Baltic Sea. 
Krakovska regija je bila že v helsinški konvenciji12 opredeljena kot eno od kritičnih območij za varstvo Baltskega morja, saj je na tem območju kljub njegovi oddaljenosti od obale visoka koncentracija industrijskih panog, ki izpuščajo odpadke v reko Vislo, ki se izliva v Baltsko morje.
A common solution for the whole urban area of Krakow was prepared and included in the national programme for purification of communal wastewater. 
Skupna rešitev za celotno urbano območje Krakova je bila pripravljena in vključena v nacionalni program za prečiščevanje komunalnih odpadnih vod.
The project of a sewage treatment plant in Krakow was then included in the national ISPA strategy for the environment in 1999, to be implemented as one of the priority projects. 
Projekt naprave za čiščenje odplak v Krakovu je bil nato leta 1999 vključen v nacionalno strategijo ISPA za okolje, v kateri naj bi se izvajal kot eden od prednostnih projektov.
12 Helsinki Convention: convention on the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area, signed in 1974 and revised in 1992 which concerns all the states bordering on the Baltic Sea. 
12 Helsinška konvencija: Konvencija o varstvu morskega okolja območja Baltiškega morja, podpisana leta 1974 in spremenjena leta 1992. Zadeva vse države, ki mejijo na Baltsko morje.
The convention covers the whole of the Baltic Sea area, including inland waters as well as the water of the sea itself and the sea-bed. 
Konvencija velja za celotno območje Baltskega morja, vključno s celinskimi vodami ter vodo samega morja in morskim dnom.
Measures are also taken in the whole catchment area of the Baltic Sea to reduce land-based pollution. 
Tudi ukrepi se izvajajo v celotnem povodju Baltskega morja, da se zmanjša onesnaževanje s kopnega.
In Latvia the main objectives of the national environment policy plan, which was approved in 1995, were to enable the country to comply with the requirements of the Community environmental legal framework and with the objectives of the accession partnership. 
V Latviji sta bila glavna cilja nacionalnega načrta za okoljsko politiko, ki je bil odobren leta 1995, da se državi omogoči izpolnjevati zahteve okoljskega pravnega okvira Skupnosti in da se dosežejo cilji partnerstva za pristop.
The objectives of this policy plan were taken over in the national ISPA strategy for the environment. 
Cilji tega načrta za okoljsko politiko so bili preneseni v nacionalno strategijo ISPA za okolje.
The selection process for the projects was based on these objectives. Special Report No 12/2008 — The Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), 2000–06 
Na njih je temeljil proces izbiranja projektov. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2008 – Instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA) 2000–2006
Three main guidelines were developed by the Commission and made available for project preparation. (a) An ISPA manual was provided to the beneficiary countries in 2000, during the preparation phase of the first project applications. (b) A second version of the ISPA manual was developed in 2002, clarifying in particular the tendering and contracting procedures. (c) Updated guidance on cost–benefit analysis was made available in 2002, which addressed weaknesses identified in the previous version. 
Komisija je razvila tri glavne dokumente s smernicami, ki jih je dala na voljo za pripravo projektov: (a) v fazi priprave prvih projektnih vlog je bil leta 2000 državam upravičenkam zagotovljen priročnik ISPA; (b) leta 2002 je bila pripravljena druga različica priročnika ISPA, v kateri so bili zlasti pojasnjeni razpisni postopki in postopki sklepanja pogodb; (c) leta 2002 so bile razposlane posodobljene smernice o analizi stroškov in koristi, ki so se posvečale slabostim, ugotovljenim v prejšnji različici.
In particular it gave average rates of return and recommended time horizons for different sectors. 
V njih so bile zlasti navedene povprečne stopnje donosa in priporočeni roki za različne sektorje.
However, it did not provide any details or forecasting techniques concerning impacts on the environment. 
Vendar smernice niso zagotovile nobenih podrobnosti ali metod napovedovanja vplivov na okolje.
These methodological guides were developed after the projects audited by the Court were submitted to the Commission for approval. 
Ti metodološki vodniki so bili razviti zatem, ko so bili projekti, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, predloženi Komisiji v odobritev.
This late availability limited their contribution to familiarising the candidate countries with the policies, procedures and the funding principles of the EU. 
Ta pozna razpoložljivost vodnikov je omejila njihov prispevek k seznanjanju držav članic s politikami EU, njenimi postopki in načeli financiranja.
WEAKNESSES IN FINANCIAL AND COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS CBA 22. 
SLABOSTI FINANČNE ANALIZE TER ANALIZE STROŠKOV IN KORISTI 22.
Each application for ISPA assistance had to contain a financial and a cost–benefit analysis. 
Vsaka vloga za pomoč ISPA je morala vsebovati finančno analizo ter analizo stroškov in koristi.
For some projects these were not available or presented weaknesses. 
Ti pri nekaterih projektih nista bili na voljo ali pa so se v njiju kazale slabosti.
Nevertheless, the Commission considered that, since most of the projects were required to fulfil basic needs in the candidate countries, it was not appropriate to hold them up because of shortcomings in the cost–benefit analysis. 16 Special Report No 12/2008 — The Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), 2000–06 
Toda ker je bil namen večine projektov zadostiti osnovnim potrebam držav kandidatk, je Komisija menila, da jih ni primerno zadrževati zaradi pomanjkljivosti v analizi stroškov in koristi. 16 Posebno poročilo št. 12/2008 – Instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA) 2000–2006
The Court’s review of the financial and cost–benefit analyses provided for the projects audited identified the following weaknesses13: (a) some missing information about discount rates used and scenario assumptions where a risk analysis was presented; (b) inconsistencies of CBA and financial analyses figures between different documents for the same project; (c) unsubstantiated socio-economic benefits and incomplete estimates of effects in the transport sector. 
Sodišče je pri pregledu finančnih analiz ter analiz stroškov in koristi, ki so bile zagotovljene za revidirane projekte, ugotovilo naslednje slabosti13: (a) kjer je bila podana analiza tveganja, so manjkale nekatere informacije o uporabljenih diskontnih stopnjah in predpostavkah scenarija; (b) v različnih dokumentih za isti projekt so bili navedeni neskla-dni številčni podatki iz analize stroškov in koristi ter finančne analize; (c) neutemeljene socialno-ekonomske koristi in necelovite ocene vplivov v prometnem sektorju.
In these circumstances, the Commission was unable to confirm from the cost–benefit analysis that the projects submitted by the candidate countries represented in relative terms the highest added value. 
V takšnih razmerah Komisija na podlagi analize stroškov in koristi ni mogla potrditi, da projekti, ki so jih predložile države kandidatke, v relativnem smislu nudijo najvišjo dodano vrednost.
GENERAL FRAMEWORK AND AUDIT CRITERIA 25. 
SPLOŠNI OKVIR IN REVIZIJSKA MERILA 25.
After the assessment of project application and approval by the Commission, a financing memorandum was signed defining, in particular, the financial resources and planning for implementing the project, including the completion date. 
Ko je Komisija ocenila projektno vlogo in jo odobrila, je bil podpisan memorandum o financiranju, v katerem so bili opredeljeni zlasti finančni viri in načrtovanje izvedbe projekta, vključno z datumom zaključka.
After project completion, candidate countries had to present a final report. 
Po dokončanju projekta so morale države kandidatke predstaviti končno poročilo.
The Court assessed to what extent the main conditions set in the financing memorandum had been respected, that is: (a) whether projects had been implemented according to initial plan and the reasons for any delay; (b) whether the financial plans for the projects had been respected and if not, the reasons why. 
Sodišče je ocenilo, v kolikšni meri so se upoštevali glavni pogoji, določeni v memorandumu o financiranju, torej: (a) ali so bili projekti izvedeni v skladu s prvotnim načrtom in kakšni so bili razlogi za vsako zamudo; (b) ali so se upoštevali finančni načrti za projekte in, če se niso, razlogi za to.
13 See also Special Report No 5/2003 (weaknesses in project appraisal, paragraphs 30 to 34) and Special Report No 6/2005 (weaknesses in evaluation and selection of projects, paragraphs 30 to 43). 
13 Glej tudi Posebno poročilo št. 5/2003 (slabosti pri ocenjevanju projektov, odstavki 30 do 34) in Posebno poročilo št. 6/2005 (slabosti pri vrednotenju in izboru projektov, odstavki 30 do 43).
17 Special Report No 12/2008 — The Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), 2000–06 ALMOST ALL PROJECTS WERE DELAYED 27. 
12/2008 – Instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA) 2000–2006 PRI SKORAJ VSEH PROJEKTIH JE PRIHAJALO DO ZAMUD 27.
If projects are delivered later than expected, the benefits are deferred and the problems they are intended to address continue for longer than necessary. 
Če so projekti dokončani pozneje, kot je bilo pričakovano, so tudi koristi na voljo pozneje, težave, ki naj bi jih projekti odpravljali, pa se nadaljujejo dlje, kot bi bilo potrebno.
Delays also create uncertainties, as the socio-economic environment may change and may make it difficult to implement projects as foreseen. 
Zamude povzročajo tudi negotovost, saj se socialno-ekonomsko okolje lahko spremeni, kar lahko otežkoči predvideno izvajanje projektov.
The 32 projects in the Court’s sample were approved between 2000 and 2003. 
Vseh 32 projektov v vzorcu Sodišča je bilo odobrenih med letoma 2000 in 2003.
The majority of the projects audited should have been completed between 2004 and 2006 according to the initial financial memoranda. 
Večina revidiranih projektov bi morala biti v skladu s prvotnimi memorandumi o financiranju končana med letoma 2004 in 2006.
However, only five had been completed by the initial expected date14 at the time of the audit (two in the Czech Republic and three in Latvia)15. 
Vendar jih je bilo v času revizije le pet končanih do prvotno pričakovanega datuma14 (dva na Češkem in trije v Latviji)15.
For the other 27 projects, the completion date was amended. 
Pri ostalih 27 projektih je bil datum dokončanja spremenjen.
The delays vary from 2 to 5 years (Poland), 4 to 4.5 years (Bulgaria), 2 to 4.8 years (Romania), 1.5 years (Hungary) and 1 to 3 years (Latvia). 
Zamude trajajo od 2 do 5 let (Poljska), od 4 do 4,5 leta (Bolgarija), od 2 do 4,8 leta (Romunija), 1,5 leta (Madžarska) in od 1 do 3 let (Latvija).
In the Czech Republic, there were no major delays. 
Na Češkem ni bilo večjih zamud.
In the survey addressed to the project managers in the four audited countries, the Court obtained information on the delays in implementation and the reasons for the delays. 
Z anketo, naslovljeno na vodje projektov v štirih revidiranih državah, je Sodišče pridobilo informacije o zamudah pri izvajanju in razlogih zanje.
In the environment sector, the average scheduled duration of the projects was 5 years and in the transport sector, 4.2 years. 
V okoljskem sektorju je povprečno načrtovano trajanje projektov znašalo 5 let, v prometnem sektorju pa 4,2 leta.
According to the survey, the average delay was 2.5 years in both sectors (see Figure 5). 
Sodeč po anketi je povprečna zamuda v obeh sektorjih trajala 2,5 leta (glej sliko 5).