natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The examples of disallowed practices in the four Member States referred to in Box 2 show that the control mechanisms are working, and highlight the utility of combining all types of food law controls in one coherent system. 
Primeri prepovedane prakse v štirih državah članicah iz okvira 2 dokazujejo, da nadzorni mehanizmi delujejo, in poudarjajo koristnost združitve vseh vrst nadzora živilske zakonodaje v en usklajen sistem.
See the reply to points 29 and 30 and 31–32. 
Glej odgovor k točkam 29, 30, 31 in 32.
According to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 and in line with the subsidiarity principle, Member States are better placed to decide the use of resources based on risk-assessment and specificities of the national market. 
882/2004 in v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti so države članice primernejše za sprejemanje odločitev glede uporabe sredstev na podlagi ocene tveganja in posebnosti domačega trga.
The Commission is obliged to carry out audits to verify the implementation of multiannual national control plans, and of official controls in the Member States12. 
Komisija mora izvajati revizije, da preveri izvajanje večletnih nacionalnih načrtov nadzora in uradnega nadzora v državah članicah12.
The Commission, under Regulation (EC) No 882/2004, is required to carry out general and specific audits to verify that national authorities control, ensure and enforce the correct application of feed and food law. 
882/2004 mora Komisija s splošnimi in posebnimi revizijami preverjati, ali nacionalni organi nad-zirajo, zagotavljajo in uresničujejo pravilno uporabo zakonodaje o krmi in živilih.
The responsibility for this verification under the OFFC, including the geographical indications (GI) scheme, is clear. 
Odgovornost za to preverjanje v okviru OFFC, vključno s shemo geografskih označb (GO), je jasna.
The audits are planned and executed by the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO — the Health and Consumers DG) in full cooperation with the Agriculture and Rural Development DG. 
Revizije načrtuje in izvaja Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo (GD SANCO) ob polnem sodelovanju z GD AGRI.
On-the-spot audits are not the only tools to monitor the implementation of legislation. 
Revizije na kraju samem niso edino orodje za spremljanje izvajanja zakonodaje.
Other tools, including infringements procedures, bilateral meetings with individual Member States, exchanges in committees, are employed by the Commission. 
Komisija uporablja tudi druga orodja, vključno s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, dvostranskimi srečanji s posameznimi državami članicami in izmenjavami med odbori.
This was also previously done by the Agriculture and Rural Development DG in various meetings to discuss the multiannual national control plans (MANCPs) and annual reports (ARs). 11 In the case of PDO/PGI this was done at the 89th committee meeting of 26 May 2011. Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 
12 Na področjih, opredeljenih na podlagi tveganja, se lahko opravijo pregledi na kraju samem, preostali nadzor pa se izvede s pregledi večletnih nacionalnih načrtov nadzora in letnih poročil. Posebno poročilo št. 11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost?
40 Joint reply to points 31–32 The plans and reports reviewed in 2009 by the Court were the Member States’ first response to the planning and reporting requirements of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004. 
40 Skupni odgovor k točkama 31 in 32 Načrti in poročila, ki jih je Sodišče pregledalo leta 2009, so bili prvi odziv držav članic na zahteve za načrtovanje in poročanje iz Uredbe (ES) št.
In the meantime the Commission has been working with the Member States to improve the amount and quality of the information in these reports across all sectors; these efforts include the provision of information in relation to PDO/PGI controls. 
882/2004. Medtem Komisija sodeluje z državami članicami, da bi se v vseh sektorjih izboljšali količina in kakovost informacij v teh poročilih.
At the beginning of 2010, the Agriculture and Rural Development DG assessed the MANCPs and ARs of 10 Member States (where a general audit by the FVO was scheduled for the year 2010) with regard to the provisions on PDOs/PGIs and provided the FVO with comments on these documents. 
V začetku leta 2010 je GD AGRI ocenil večletne nacionalne načrte nadzora in letna poročila desetih držav članic (v katerih je v letu 2010 Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo načrtoval splošno revizijo) v zvezi z določbami o ZOP/ZGO ter Uradu za prehrano in veterinarstvo predložil pripombe o teh dokumentih.
The Commission is frequently confronted with serious deficiencies or inadequacies in the applications received. 
Komisija se v prejetih vlogah pogosto srečuje z resnimi pomanjkljivostmi in nezadostnimi podatki.
The Commission has systematically offered the possibility to the applicant to complete/ clarify/amend its initial application. 
Komisija vložniku sistematično omogoča, da dopolni/pojasni/ spremeni svojo prvotno vlogo.
Such flexibility and enhanced cooperation with the applicants largely explain the average length referred to by the Court. 
Ta prilagodljivost in okrepljeno sodelovanje z vložniki v veliki meri pojasnjujeta povprečno trajanje postopka, na katero opozarja Sodišče.
The Commission is confident that two guides released in 2010 and referred to by the Court will lead to improving the quality of applications. 
Komisija je prepričana, da bosta priročnika, ki sta bila izdana leta 2010 in ki ju navaja Sodišče, zagotovila izboljšanje kakovosti vlog.
In addition, in order to reach this goal, it has been explained to Member States during several committee meetings on PGIs and PDOs that this flexibility needs to be limited in order to ensure a more timely management of requests for registration, within strict respect of current rules. 
Poleg tega je bilo za uresničitev tega cilja državam članicam na več srečanjih odbora v zvezi z ZOP in ZGO pojasnjeno, da je treba to prilagodljivost omejiti, da se zagotovi časovno bolj učinkovita obravnava zahtevkov za registracijo ob strogem spoštovanju veljavnih predpisov.
The rural development programming is, above all, based on the national/regional needs which are translated into the respective strategy. 
Programi razvoja podeželja temeljijo zlasti na nacionalnih/regionalnih potrebah, ki so prenesene v ustrezno strategijo.
It is logical that not all Member States have programmed measure 132. 
Razumljivo je, da niso vse države članice v te programe vključile ukrepa 132.
While PDOs/PGIs are important to some Member States, they may be of less importance to some other Member States which would rather use the finite funds elsewhere. 
Medtem ko so ZOP/ZGO pomembne za nekatere države članice, so manj pomembne za druge, ki omejena sredstva raje uporabijo za druge namene.
See also the reply to point 46. 
Glej tudi odgovor k točki 46.
The survey was conducted at a time when the use of the logo, or any identification of the EU PDO or PGI status on the product, was optional, contrary to the situation as from 1 May 2009, when their use became compulsory. 
V času izvajanja raziskave je bila uporaba logotipa ali katere koli opredelitve statusa ZOP ali ZGO v EU na proizvodu neobvezna, medtem ko je od 1. maja 2009 uporaba teh opredelitev obvezna.
Many of the most famous names, having developed their own marketing identities did not use the ‘PDO’ or ‘PGI’ identity or logo. 
Veliko najbolj znanih imen, ki so razvila svoje lastne tržne identitete, ni uporabljalo označb „ZOP“ ali „ZGO“ ali logotipa.
In addition, its attractiveness is proven by other elements such as the fact that the Agriculture and Rural Development DG continues to receive many new applications or that many products bearing a registered name can claim a price premium compared to non-registered products from the same sector. Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 
Privlačnost sheme dokazujejo tudi drugi elementi, na primer dejstvo, da GD AGRI še naprej prejema veliko novih vlog ali da je veliko proizvodov z registriranim imenom upravičenih do cenovne premije, neregi-strirani proizvodi iz istega sektorja pa ne. Posebno poročilo št. 11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost?
41 The primary objective of the scheme is to register and protect the names. 
41 Glavni cilj sheme je registracija in zaščita imen.
The provision of marketing tools and other economic benefits are secondary to this primary aim. 
Na drugem mestu pa je zagotavljanje tržnih orodij in drugih gospodarskih koristi.
As part of the ongoing reflexion on the reform of the regime on information and promotion of agricultural products, the Commission will consider appropriate ways to further enhance the promotion of quality schemes. 
Komisija bo v okviru tekočega razmišljanja o reformi ureditve ukrepov za informiranje o kmetijskih proizvodih in njihovo promocijo preučila ustrezne načine za dodatno okrepitev promocije shem kakovosti.
This issue will be addressed, inter alia, by a Green Paper published on 14 July 2011. 
To vprašanje je med drugim obravnavano v zeleni knjigi, objavljeni 14. julija 2011.
See the reply to point 55. 
Glej odgovor k točki 55.
As measure 133 is not limited to GI schemes, it is clear that the focus cannot be the GI scheme itself. 
Ukrep 133 ni omejen na sheme GO, zato je jasno, da se ne osredotoča na GO.
Where the promotion concerns for example a regional quality scheme dealing with only one product, it is normal that the emphasis will be on that product. 
Kadar se promocija nanaša na primer na regionalno shemo kakovosti, ki obravnava le en proizvod, je pričakovati, da bo poudarek na tem proizvodu.
In general, promotion of a food quality scheme cannot be separated from the products covered, otherwise the consumer cannot relate to the scheme. 
Promocije sheme kakovosti hrane praviloma ni mogoče ločiti od proizvodov, ki jih zajema, ker se v tem primeru potrošnik ne more povezati s shemo.
The implementation of the measure can be followed up by the output indicator which measures the number of supported information and promotion actions. 
Po izvedbi ukrepa se lahko uvede kazalnik učinka, ki meri število podprtih dejavnosti informiranja in promocije.
The importance of the measure is further assessed by the result indicator measuring the value of agricultural production under recognised quality labels/standards. 
Pomembnost ukrepa se oceni tudi s kazalnikom rezultatov, ki meri vrednost kmetijske proizvodnje v skladu s priznanimi označ-bami/standardi kakovosti.
Therefore, the impact cannot only be derived from the uptake of the measure. 
Zato učinka ni mogoče oceniti samo na podlagi uporabe ukrepa.
Measure 133 not only applies to GI schemes, but also quality schemes recognised by the Member States. 
Ukrep 133 se ne nanaša samo na sheme GO, ampak tudi na sheme kakovosti, ki jih priznavajo države članice.
Moreover, even if a Member State has no product registered as a PDO/PGI, it has the choice to include measures 132 and 133 into its rural development programme (RDP) in anticipation of quality product registration. 
Poleg tega lahko država članica v pričakovanju registracije kakovostnih proizvodov vključi ukrepa 132 in 133 v svoj program razvoja podeželja, tudi če v njej ni proizvodov, registriranih kot ZOP/ZGO.
The cumulative expenditure at the end of 2010 shows an increase of 131% (or 9,18 million euro) compared to the cumulative expenditure at the end of 2009. 
Skupni odhodki konec leta 2010 so se v primerjavi s skupnimi odhodki leta 2009 povečali za 131 % (ali 9,18 milijona EUR).
Sectoral and geographical evaluations of the promotion measures have already been elaborated by external consultants. 
Zunanji svetovalci so že pripravili sektorska in geografska vrednotenja promocijskih ukrepov.
The conclusions of the two evaluations dealing respectively with specific areas covering third countries’ programmes and particular products’ sectors in the internal market were positive and their recommendations for further improvements have been taken into account. 
Sklepne ugotovitve dveh vrednotenj, ki sta obravnavali posebna področja v zvezi s programi tretjih držav in sektorji določenih proizvodov na notranjem trgu, so bile pozitivne, pri čemer so se upoštevala njihova priporočila za nadaljnje izboljšave.
Evaluation methods as well as impact assessments at each programme’s level have been made mandatory since 2008 and regulatory dispositions have been reinforced in accordance with the Court of Auditors’ recommendations in its Special Report No 10/2009. 
Leta 2008 so metode vrednotenja in ocene učinka na vsaki ravni programa postale obvezne, regulativne določbe pa so bile okrepljene v skladu s priporočili Računskega sodišča iz njegovega posebnega poročila št. 10/2009.
Programmes adopted since 2008 do include data which will be taken into account within the ongoing external evaluation of Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008. 
Programi, sprejeti po letu 2008, vključujejo podatke, ki se bodo upoštevali v okviru tekočega zunanjega vrednotenja Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3/2008.
This evaluation is expected to be available by October 2011. 
Pričakuje se, da bo to vrednotenje na voljo oktobra 2011.
The Commission would underline that: — small producer groups can also benefit from the rural development promotion measure 133; — in the past, programmes not representing large market volume were accepted with respect to the regulatory conditions. 
Komisija želi poudariti, da: — imajo lahko tudi majhne skupine proizvajalcev koristi od promocijskega ukrepa 133 za razvoj podeželja; — so se programi, ki niso imeli velikega obsega trgovanja, v preteklosti sprejemali glede na regulativne pogoje.
Box 3 Taking into account both the populations involved and the limited budgetary resources devoted to the information and promotion regime, the programmes co-financed in the USA and Canada target opinion multipliers and leaders instead of public opinion. 
Okvir 3 Ob upoštevanju vključenega prebivalstva in omejenih proračunskih sredstev, namenjenih ureditvi ukrepov za informiranje in promocijo, so programi, sofinancirani v ZDA in Kanadi, usmerjeni na oblikovalce javnega mnenja in ne na javno mnenje.
Within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 814/2000, calls for proposals to support information measures in agriculture are launched every year. 
814/2000 se vsako leto objavijo razpisi za zbiranje predlogov za podporo ukrepom informiranja v kmetijstvu.
The EU food quality policy has been one of the priority actions in the last three years. 
Politika EU na področju kakovosti hrane je zadnja tri leta ena od prednostnih nalog.
However, it is for Member States to put forward schemes — the Commission cannot oblige them to do so. 
Vendar se morajo države članice same odločiti za predložitev sheme, ker jih Komisija k temu ne more zavezati.
Although modest in budget, different types of information measures are foreseen, such as information campaigns, radio and/or television programmes, documen-taries, discussion programmes, measures targeting universities and schools, media events, etc.13 13 See e.g. 2010/C 231/05 (OJ C 231, 27.8.2010, p. 
Čeprav bo proračun majhen, se načrtujejo različne vrste ukrepov za informiranje, na primer informativne kampanje, radijske in/ali televizijske oddaje, dokumentarne oddaje, pogovorne oddaje, ukrepi, usmerjeni na univerze in šole, medijski dogodki itd13. 13 Glej npr. 2010/C231/05, UL C 231, 27.8.2010, str.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Also, the Agriculture and Rural Development DG participates on a regular basis in agricultural fairs, conferences14, seminars, round tables, etc. in Member States and third countries to make the GI scheme better known among potential participants. 
8. ODGOVORI KOMISIJE GD AGRI prav tako redno sodeluje na kmetijskih sejmih, konferencah14, seminarjih, okroglih mizah itd. v državah članicah in tretjih državah, da bi izboljšal prepoznavnost sheme GO med morebitnimi udeleženci.
GI schemes have had an important place in high-level missions organised by the Agriculture and Rural Development DG15. 
Sheme GO so imele pomembno vlogo v misijah na visoki ravni, ki jih je organiziral GD AGRI15.
The Quality website attracts more than 50 000 page views by more than 10 000 unique visitors per month. 
Spletna stran o kakovosti zabeleži več kot 50 000 obiskov več kot 10 000 enkratnih obiskovalcev na mesec.
14 Quality was one of the main topics of the Salone del Gusto in Turin in 2010, which the Agriculture and Rural Development DG took part in. 
14 Kakovost je bila ena od glavnih tem dogodka Salone del Gusto v Torinu leta 2010, pri katerem je sodeloval GD AGRI.
The GI schemes were also a topic on several conferences, such as the one on ‘Food quality certification schemes: adding value to farm produce’ organised by the Commission on 5 and 6 February 2007, or the 2-day high-level conference in Prague in 2009. 
Sheme GO so bile tudi tema več konferenc, na primer konference „Sheme za potrjevanje kakovosti hrane: dodajanje vrednosti kmetijskim proizvodom“, ki jo je Komisija organizirala 5. in 6. februarja 2007, ali dvodnevne konference na visoki ravni v Pragi leta 2009.
In 2010 the Agriculture and Rural Development DG also published a newsletter on quality logos. 
GD AGRI je leta 2010 objavil tudi glasilo o logotipih kakovosti.
15 For instance, a high-level mission exclusively devoted to the GI schemes was held from 21 to 25 March 2011 in China, with the participation of the Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development. 
15 Misija na visoki ravni, namenjena izključno shemam GO, je na primer potekala na Kitajskem od 21. do 25. marca 2001, udeležil pa se je je komisar za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja.
Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 
Posebno poročilo št. 11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost?
Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 provides for the appropriate legal framework for all food law obligations. 
882/2004 zagotavlja ustrezen pravni okvir za vse obveznosti živilske zakonodaje.
However without putting into question the application of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004, the Commission proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (COM(2010) 733 of 10 December 2010) on agricultural product quality schemes provides further details on the control system covering GIs. 
Vendar predlog Komisije za Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (COM(2010) 733 z dne 10. decembra 2010) o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov zagotavlja dodatne podrobnosti o sistemu nadzora, ki zajema geografske označbe, ne da bi pri tem ogrozil uporabo Uredbe (ES) št.
Food law controls, including Article 11 checks are carried out in a harmonised framework of general rules as laid down in the OFFC Regulation (EC) No 882/2004. 
Nadzor živilske zakonodaje, vključno s pregledi iz člena 11, poteka na podlagi usklajenega okvira splošnih pravil iz Uredbe (ES) št.
This regulation covers all issues falling in the field of consumer protection, including food labelling and consumer information issues. 
882/2004 OFFC. Uredba zajema vsa vprašanja, ki spadajo na področje varstva potrošnikov, vključno z vprašanji glede označevanja živil in obveščanja potrošnikov.
The specific modalities should be left to the Member States. 
Odločitve glede posebnih načinov je treba prepustiti državam članicam.
Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 requires Member States to carry out official controls regularly on a risk basis with appropriate frequency taking account, inter alia, of past history of compliance and the reliability of operators’ own controls. 
882/2004 od držav članic zahteva, da uradni nadzor opravljajo redno, na podlagi tveganja in z ustrezno pogostnostjo, pri čemer med drugim upoštevajo preteklo skladnost in zanesljivost lastnih kontrol gospodarskih subjektov.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Recommendation 1 The current regulatory system based on Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 provides for the necessary level of detail as regards the requirements of the GI checks. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Priporočilo 1 Veljaven regulativni sistem, ki temelji na Uredbi (ES) št. 882/2004, zagotavlja potrebno raven podrobnosti v zvezi z zahtevami za preglede GO.
Under the OFFC Regulation, the specific modalities regarding these controls are left to Member States pursuant to the principle of subsidiarity. 
Odločitve glede posebnih načinov v zvezi z navedenim nadzorom so na podlagi Uredbe OFFC prepuščene državam članicam v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti.
The Commission will however further discuss with Member States the coverage of checks, their frequency and the methodology for their selection in executing their responsibilities under the Official Food and Feed Control (OFFC) Regulation. 
Vendar bo Komisija z državami članicami nadalje razpravljala o obsegu pregledov, njihovi pogostnosti in metodologiji za njihov izbor pri izvajanju odgovornosti v skladu z Uredbo o uradnem nadzoru živil in krme (OFFC).
The obligation for Member States to perform checks aiming at detection and suppression of disallowed practices is provided in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004. 
Obveznost držav članic glede opravljanja pregledov, katerih cilj je odkrivanje in odpravljanje prepovedanih praks, je določena v Uredbi (ES) št. 882/2004.
Member States are requested to do so in a way that best suits their needs, based on a risk analysis. 
Države članice morajo to obveznost izpolnjevati na način, ki najbolj ustreza njihovim potrebam, na podlagi analize tveganja.
Recommendation 2 Regulation (EC) 882/2004 sets out clear principles for checks aiming at the detection and suppression of disallowed practices, which are established by Member States on the basis of a risk analysis. 
Priporočilo 2 Uredba (ES) št. 882/2004 določa jasna načela za preglede, katerih cilj je odkrivanje in odpravljanje prepovedanih praks ter ki jih države članice vzpostavijo na podlagi analize tveganja.
However without putting into question the application of this regulation, the Commission proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (COM(2010) 733 of 10 December 2010) on agricultural product quality schemes provides additional details on the control system covering GIs. 
Vendar predlog Komisije za Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (COM(2010) 733 z dne 10. decembra 2010) o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov zagotavlja dodatne podrobnosti o sistemu nadzora, ki zajema geografske označbe, ne da bi pri tem ogrozil uporabo te uredbe.
44 At the same time, within the frame of the OFFC architecture, these issues will be further reflected upon. 
44 Hkrati pa se bodo ta vprašanja nadalje obravnavala v okviru strukture OFFC.
With regard to mutual assistance provisions, they are already applicable in accordance with the provisions of Title IV (Administrative assistance and cooperation in the areas of feed and food), Articles 34 to 40 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004. 
Kar zadeva določbe o medsebojni pomoči, se te že uporabljajo v skladu z določbami iz členov 34–40 iz naslova IV (Upravna pomoč in sodelovanje na področju krme in živil) Uredbe (ES) št.
Audits and need for audit planning follow well-established criteria and are based on risk analysis and largely focused on hygiene and safety. 
Revizije in potreba po načrtovanju revizij upoštevajo dobro uveljavljena merila, temeljijo na analizi tveganja ter se osredotočajo predvsem na higiensko ustreznost in varnost.
Commission resources are very tight and choices have to be made in consideration of all food law undertakings. 
Sredstva Komisije so zelo omejena, pri odločitvah pa je treba upoštevati vse obveze živilske zakonodaje.
See also the reply to Recommendation 3. 
Glej tudi odgovor k priporočilu 3.