natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, only 14 Member States had registered users at the time of our audit, meaning that there is no full and consistent EU coverage for this type of threat reporting. 
Toda registrirane uporabnike je v času naše revizije imelo le 14 držav članic, kar pomeni, da za tovrstno sporočanje nevarnosti ni popolne in skladne pokritosti na ravni EU.
The Commission did not provide clear evidence of how the platform would be moderated and maintained, or how training and promotion of its use would be organised. 
Komisija ni posredovala jasnih navedb o tem, kako bi se taka platforma vodila in vzdrževala ali kako bi se organizirala usposabljanje in spodbujanje njene uporabe.
73 The standard operating procedure for rapid risk assessments to be performed by the Scientific Committee only referred to chemical incidents and did not mention environmental threats. 
73 Standardni operativni postopek za hitre ocene tveganja, ki jih pripravi Znanstveni odbor, se je nanašal le na kemične nesreče, okoljske nevarnosti pa v njem niso bile omenjene.
We did not identify any other standard operating procedure at the level of the Commission for obtaining rapid risk assessments for serious cross-border environmental threats. 
Drugih standardnih operativnih postopkov na ravni Komisije za pridobivanje hitrih ocen tveganja za resne čezmejne okoljske nevarnosti Sodišče ni našlo.
Overall there was little EU-level experience in responding to serious cross-border chemical or environmental threats, and the relevant updated monitoring and early response arrangements for such threats were yet to be tested. 
Na splošno je bilo na ravni EU le malo izkušenj z odzivanjem na resne čezmejne kemične ali okoljske nevarnosti, ustrezne posodobljene ureditve za spremljanje in zgodnji odziv na take nevarnosti pa še niso bile preizkušene.
59 Rapid Alert System for chemical threats: RASCHEM. 
59 Sistem hitrega opozarjanja za kemične nevarnosti: RASCHEM.
Audit observations 35 60 Chapter III of Decision No 1082/2013/EU. 
Revizijska opažanja 35 60 Poglavje III Sklepa št. 1082/2013/EU.
61 A case definition is a set of commonly agreed criteria that have to be fulfilled in order to accurately identify cases of a targeted serious cross-border threat to health. 
61 Opredelitev primera je sklop skupno dogovorjenih meril, ki morajo biti izpolnjena za natančno prepoznavanje primerov zadevne čezmejne nevarnosti za zdravje.
62 ECDC Chapter 9.1 Surveillance ‘Context and future outlook’. 
62 ECDC, poglavje 9.1 Surveillance: Context and future outlook (9.1 Spremljanje: Okvir in obeti za prihodnost).
63 ECDC collects, analyses and disseminates surveillance data on 53 communicable diseases and related special health issues from all 28 European Union (EU) Member States and two of the three remaining European Economic Area (EEA) countries (Iceland and Norway) (http://ecdc.europa. eu/en/activities/surveillance/ Pages/index.aspx). 
63 ECDC zbira, analizira in posreduje podatke o spremljanju za 53 nalezljivih bolezni in z njimi povezane posebne zdravstvene probleme iz vseh 28 držav članic Evropske unije (EU) ter z Islandije in Norveške, dveh od treh preostalih držav Evropskega gospodarskega prostora (EGP). http://ecdc. europa.eu/en/activities/ surveillance/Pages/index. aspx.
64 Commission Implementing Decision 2012/506/EU of 8 August 2012 amending Decision 2002/253/EC laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community Network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 262, 27.9.2012, p. 
64 Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2012/506/EU z dne 8. avgusta 2012 o spremembi Odločbe 2002/253/ES o opredelitvi primerov nalezljivih bolezni za poročanje mreži Skupnosti v skladu z Odločbo št. 2119/98/ ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 262, 27.9.2012, str.
The EU system for epidemiological surveillance generally works well, but some further work is required to optimise data comparability and quality 74 The Commission should60 establish and update procedures for the operation of the epidemiological surveillance network as developed in application of specific provisions in the ECDC founding regulation. 
Sistem EU za epidemiološko spremljanje na splošno dobro deluje, potrebno pa je nadaljnje delo za optimizacijo primerljivosti in kakovosti podatkov 74 Komisija mora60 vzpostaviti in posodobiti postopke za delovanje mreže epidemiološkega spremljanja, razvite v skladu s posebnimi določbami uredbe o ustanovitvi ECDC.
In addition, when reporting information on epidemiological surveillance, the national competent authorities should, where available, use the case definitions61 adopted in accordance with the decision for each communicable disease and related special health issue included in an EU list of diseases. 
Poleg tega morajo pristojni nacionalni organi pri sporočanju informacij o epidemiološkem spremljanju uporabljati razpoložljive opredelitve primerov61, sprejete v skladu s sklepom, za vsako nalezljivo bolezen in z njo povezan poseben zdravstveni problem iz seznama bolezni, ki ga je pripravila EU.
The Commission adopts case definitions to ensure data comparability and compatibility at Union level. 
Komisija sprejme opredelitve primerov, da bi zagotovila primerljivost in združljivost podatkov na ravni Unije.
ECDC hosts and operates the epidemiological surveillance platform TESSy to which Member States upload their surveillance data. 
ECDC gosti in upravlja platformo TESSy za epidemiološko spremljanje, kamor države članice naložijo svoje podatke o spremljanju.
Improving the quality of surveillance data collected at a European level constitutes one of ECDC’s objectives in its long-term surveillance strategy for 2014-2020. 
Izboljšanje kakovosti podatkov o spremljanju, zbranih na evropski ravni, je eden od ciljev ECDC v njegovi dolgoročni strategiji spremljanja za obdobje 2014–2020.
ECDC’s strategic multiannual programme62 also states that data quality and comparability across Member States can be increased. 
Strateški večletni program ECDC62 navaja tudi, da je mogoče izboljšati kakovost in primerljivost podatkov po državah članicah.
75 ECDC and surveillance experts in the Member States have collaborated to develop surveillance standards in order to streamline EU surveillance and to improve data quality. 
75 ECDC je sodeloval z izvedenci za spremljanje v državah članicah, da bi razvili standarde spremljanja ter tako racionalizirali spremljanje v EU in izboljšali kakovost podatkov.
ECDC considers Member States’ compliance with reporting requirements to be overall satisfactory. However, data quality (completeness and representativeness) is often problematic. 
ECDC meni, da je upoštevanje zahtev glede poročanja s strani držav članic na splošno zadovoljivo, vendar so pogoste težave s kakovostjo podatkov (popolnost in reprezentativnost).
ECDC has conducted specific data quality assessments on three63 diseases to assess quality indicators such as completeness, precision and validity. 
ECDC je izvedel posebne ocene kakovosti podatkov za tri63 bolezni, da bi ocenil kazalnike kakovosti, kot so popolnost, natančnost in veljavnost.
These assessments have identified multiple shortcomings for these criteria. 
V ocenah je bilo opredeljenih več pomanjkljivosti teh meril.
76 A project run by ECDC since 2009 devoted to improving the quality of data collected by the national surveillance systems was planned to finish in 2011, but was still ongoing at the end of 2015. 
76 Projekt, ki ga je od leta 2009 vodil ECDC in je bil namenjen izboljšanju kakovosti podatkov, zbranih z nacionalnimi sistemi spremljanja, bi se moral po načrtih končati leta 2011, vendar je konec leta 2015 še vedno deloval.
Finally, according to ECDC, one of the factors contributing to the data quality issues is the fact that Member States often choose to use other case definitions than the EU case definitions established by a 2012 Commission implementing decision64. 
Po navedbah ECDC je med dejavniki, ki prispevajo k težavam s kakovostjo podatkov, tudi dejstvo, da države članice pogosto uporabljajo druge opredelitve primerov od tistih, ki jih je določila EU z izvedenim sklepom Komisije iz leta 201264.
77 Overall, we therefore found that ECDC’s efforts to address issues in epidemiological surveillance data reporting have not yet been fully effective to ensure optimal data comparability and quality. 
77 Na splošno je Sodišče torej ugotovilo, da prizadevanja ECDC za obravnavanje vprašanj glede sporočanja podatkov epidemiološkega spremljanja še niso povsem uspešna, da bi zagotovila optimalno primerljivost in kakovost podatkov.
Member States could also still improve in this area by consistently using EU-level case definitions and optimising their data delivery to ECDC. 
Države članice bi lahko to področje prav tako izboljšale, če bi dosledno uporabljale opredelitve primerov na ravni EU in optimizirale svoje posredovanje podatkov ECDC.
Audit observations 36 The performance of the health programme as regards protecting citizens from health threats showed weaknesses 78 We examined whether the EU health programmes are making effective contributions to protecting citizens from threats to health. 
Revizijska opažanja 36 Pri učinkovitosti zdravstvenega programa, kar zadeva varovanje državljanov pred nevarnostmi za zdravje, so se kazale slabosti 78 Sodišče je proučilo, ali zdravstveni programi EU uspešno prispevajo k varovanju državljanov pred nevarnostmi za zdravje.
This included a detailed examination of the management by the Consumer, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) and performance of 20 actions (see Annex III for an overview) funded under the health threats objective of the second health programme (see paragraph 11), including visits to coordinating beneficiaries of seven projects. 
K temu je spadala podrobna proučitev upravljanja, za katerega je odgovorna Izvajalska agencija za potrošnike, zdravje, kmetijstvo in hrano (Chafea), ter proučitev smotrnosti 20 ukrepov (za pregled glej Prilogo III), ki se financirajo v okviru cilja glede nevarnosti za zdravje iz drugega zdravstvenega programa (glej odstavek 11), vključno z obiski upravičencev koordinatorjev v okviru sedmih projektov.
We also audited the progress of the health threats objective under the current third health programme in terms of relevant actions formulated in the annual work plans and the related performance measuring by the Commission. 
Sodišče je revidiralo tudi napredek cilja glede nevarnosti za zdravje iz sedanjega tretjega zdravstvenega programa, kar zadeva ustrezne ukrepe, oblikovane v letnih delovnih načrtih, in z njimi povezano merjenje uspešnosti, ki ga izvaja Komisija.
Overall, we found that the performance of the health programmes, as regards protecting citizens from (serious cross-border) health threats, showed weaknesses. 
Na splošno je ugotovilo, da se pri smotrnosti zdravstvenih programov, kar zadeva varovanje državljanov pred (resnimi čezmejnimi) nevarnostmi za zdravje, kažejo slabosti.
In the following paragraphs we report on the lack of sustainable results for health threat actions under the second health programme (2008-2013) and weaknesses in measuring the indicator for the health threat objective under the third health programme. 
V naslednjih odstavkih Sodišče poroča o pomanjkanju trajnostnih rezultatov, ko gre za ukrepe na področju nevarnosti za zdravje iz drugega zdravstvenega programa (2008–2013), ter slabostih pri merjenju kazalnika za cilj glede nevarnosti za zdravje iz tretjega zdravstvenega programa.
For the 2014-2016 period we also found a relatively low level of spending on health threat actions, considering the importance and ambition of the relevant objective and available resources. 
Za obdobje 2014–2016 smo ugotovili tudi, da je bila raven porabe za ukrepe na področju nevarnosti za zdravje razmeroma nizka, če se upoštevajo pomembnost in ambicioznost ustreznega cilja ter razpoložljivi viri.
Lack of sustainable results for health threat actions under the second EU health programme 79 The second health programme should65 complement, support and add value to the policies of the Member States by protecting and promoting human health and safety and improving public health. 
Pomanjkanje trajnostnih rezultatov ukrepov na področju nevarnosti za zdravje iz drugega zdravstvenega programa EU 79 Drugi zdravstveni program bi65 dopolnjuje, podpira in dodaja vrednost politikam držav članic z varovanjem in spodbujanjem zdravja in varnosti državljanov ter izboljšanjem javnega zdravja.
The programme has three objectives, one of which is to improve citizens’ health security. 
Program ima tri cilje, med katerimi je tudi izboljšanje zdravstvene varnosti državljanov.
Under this objective, the action covered in the scope of this audit is Action 1.1: Protect citizens against health threats. 
V okviru tega cilja je v to revizijo zajet ukrep 1.1: Varovanje državljanov pred nevarnostmi za zdravje.
80 The EU financial regulation requires the budget to be implemented in compliance with the principles of sound financial management (i.e. economy, efficiency and effectiveness). 
80 Finančna uredba EU zahteva, da se proračun izvaja v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja (tj. gospodarnostjo, učinkovitostjo in uspešnostjo).
The principle of effectiveness requires attaining the specific objectives set and achieving the intended results. 
Načelo uspešnosti zahteva doseganje zadanih specifičnih ciljev in želenih rezultatov.
The Commission and Chafea need to ensure that the co-funded actions contribute to achieving the objectives of the health programme. 
Komisija in Chafea morata zagotoviti, da sofinancirani ukrepi prispevajo k doseganju ciljev zdravstvenega programa.
We also consider that results delivered by the funded actions, provided that they are of sufficient quality, should be sustained and promoted after the actions finish, in order to ensure that there is an impact and added value from them. 
Sodišče tudi meni, da bi bilo treba rezultate, ki jih zagotovijo financirani ukrepi in so dovolj dobri, ohraniti in spodbujati tudi po koncu ukrepov, da bi tako zagotovili njihov učinek in dodano vrednost.
65 Article 2(1) of Decision No 1350/2007/EC. 
65 Člen 2(1) Sklepa št. 1350/2007/ES.
Audit observations 37 81 Most of the 14 projects66 in our sample of 20 actions performed well in terms of producing the agreed deliverables (except for two, which were rated by Chafea as ‘fair’ and failed to produce some of the required deliverables, or to the required quality). 
Revizijska opažanja 37 81 Večina od 14 projektov66 v našem vzorcu 20 ukrepov je bila uspešna, kar zadeva zagotavljanje dogovorjenih končnih izdelkov (razen dveh, ki jih je Chafea ocenila za zadovoljiva in nista zagotovila nekaterih končnih izdelkov ali zahtevane kakovosti).
However, we found that many deliverables, even if very practical or ready for use (e.g. toolkits, protocols, guides) were not being used after the projects had finished, or no clear demonstration could be provided of how the deliverables influenced policymaking at national or EU levels. 
Sodišče pa je ugotovilo, da se številni končni izdelki, tudi če so zelo praktični ali pripravljeni za uporabo (npr. sklopi orodij, protokoli, smernice), po zaključku projektov niso uporabljali ali pa ni bilo mogoče jasno prikazati, kako ti končni izdelki vplivajo na oblikovanje politik na nacionalni ravni ali ravni EU.
For nine out of the 12 completed actions audited we identified significant issues concerning the lack of sustainability of results, which in many cases were also identified in Chafea’s own internal assessment notes prepared at the end of these projects (see Box 5 for examples). 
Pri devetih od dvanajstih revidiranih zaključenih ukrepov je Sodišče odkrilo bistvene težave zaradi netrajnostnih rezultatov, ki so bile v mnogih primerih opisane tudi v notranjih ocenah, ki jih je ob koncu teh projektov pripravila Chafea (za primere glej okvir 5).
82 In addition, we found that Chafea and/or the Commission give very limited technical feedback on the content of project deliverables and policy relevance when the projects finish. 
82 Poleg tega je Sodišče ugotovilo, da Chafea in/ali Komisija po zaključku projektov dajeta zelo omejene tehnične povratne informacije o vsebini končnih izdelkov projektov in njihovi pomembnosti za zadevno politiko.
This was also confirmed by the beneficiaries that we visited on the spot. 
To so potrdili tudi upravičenci, ki jih je Sodišče obiskalo na kraju samem.
When they finish, Chafea assesses projects’ potential for the broader policy context and the relevance of the action for DG Health and Food Safety’s policy. 
Ko se projekti zaključijo, Chafea oceni njihove možnosti za vključitev v širši politični okvir ter pomembnost ukrepa za politiko GD za zdravje in varnost hrane.
However, we found that DG Health and Food Safety, despite having access to these Chafea files, does not systematically review the information included in them to assess which role it can play in taking results marked as relevant for its policies further at EU level or enabling a stronger or wider EU impact67. 
Sodišče pa je ugotovilo, da GD za zdravje in varnost hrane, čeprav ima dostop do dokumentacije, ki jo pripravi Chafea, informacij v njej ne pregleduje sistematično, da bi ocenil, kakšno vlogo bi lahko imel pri nadaljnjem razvoju rezultatov, ki so označeni kot pomembni za njegove politike, na ravni EU ali pri omogočanju njihovega večjega ali širšega učinka v EU67.
During our visits to project coordinators we discussed their concerns that despite significant dissemination activities required under the grant agreement, they find it challenging to reach specific target audiences, in particular EU-level and national level policymakers. 
Na srečanjih s koordinatorji projektov je Sodišče razpravljalo o njihovih pomislekih, da kljub obsežnim dejavnostim obveščanja, ki jih zahteva sporazum o nepovratnih sredstvih, težko dosežejo specifične ciljne skupine, zlasti oblikovalce politik na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni.
66 The sample included 14 projects, one joint action and five procurement actions (see Annex III). 
66 Vzorec je obsegal 14 projektov, en skupni ukrep in pet javnih naročil (glej Prilogo III).
67 The Court has already recommended that the Commission evaluate projects ex post in order to improve the design of forthcoming projects by applying lessons learnt: see Recommendation 2 of Special Report 2/2009 on the first health programme (2003-2007). 
67 Sodišče je Komisiji že priporočilo, naj projekte naknadno oceni, da bi s pomočjo pridobljenih izkušenj izboljšala zasnovo prihodnjih projektov; glej priporočilo 2 Posebnega poročila št. 2/2009 o prvem zdravstvenem programu (2003–2007).
Examples of audited projects and issues found Our audit work for one project in the sample showed that part of the project results could not be sustained because the network of specialists using the developed IT platform largely ceased to function after the project ended. 
Primeri revidiranih projektov in ugotovljene težave Revizija Sodišča enega od projektov v vzorcu je pokazala, da nekateri rezultati projekta niso bili trajnostni, ker je mreža strokovnjakov, ki so uporabljali razvito računalniško platformo, po zaključku projekta večinoma nehala delovati.
We also audited a project with extensive research components, which proved to be overly complex and costly. 
Sodišče je revidiralo tudi projekt z obsežnimi raziskovalnimi elementi, ki se je izkazal za preveč zapletenega in dragega.
The main objective of this project was not achieved. 
Glavni cilj tega projekta ni bil dosežen.
This was in part due to the fact that lessons from the project’s predecessor were not duly taken into account and ambitions were therefore set too high. 
Do tega je deloma prišlo zaradi neupoštevanja izkušenj, pridobljenih v okviru predhodnega projekta, zato so bili cilji zastavljeni preveč ambiciozno.
In a third project for screening of a specific disease in certain populations we found that the project was very successful at delivering the required high-quality outputs, but its outputs were not updated further after the project finished, nor widely used. 
V zvezi s tretjim projektom, ki je bil namenjen presejalnim testom za neko bolezen v določenih segmentih prebivalstva, je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je zelo uspešno zagotovil zahtevane izide visoke kakovosti, toda po zaključku projekta se izložki niso več posodabljali in niso prešli v široko uporabo.
The contributions of these projects to the health programme’s health threats objective would therefore rapidly decrease with time. 
Prispevki teh projektov k cilju glede nevarnosti za zdravje iz zdravstvenega okvira bi se torej s časom hitro zmanjševali.
Audit observations 38 83 The ex post evaluation of the health programme68 listed similar issues saying that even though a considerable effort was made during the second half of the programme to enhance dissemination, there remained room for improvement in terms of raising awareness among relevant stakeholders of the results69 of co-funded actions, in order to maximise their uptake and impact70. 
Revizijska opažanja 38 83 V naknadni oceni zdravstvenega programa68 so bile navedene podobne težave: kljub obsežnim prizadevanjem v drugi polovici programa za boljše obveščanje še vedno obstaja možnost za izboljšanje, kar zadeva osveščanje ustreznih deležnikov o rezultatih69 sofinanciranih ukrepov, da bi kar najbolj povečali njihovo uporabo in vpliv70.
In addition, the evaluation report identified that if policy links are absent, it is difficult to overcome barriers for EU-wide implementation of results. 
Poleg tega poročilo o oceni ugotavlja, da je brez povezav s politiko težko preseči ovire za uporabo rezultatov v vsej EU.
According to the same report, not all co-funded actions were particularly effective when it came to achieving tangible and useful results and impacts. 
Isto poročilo navaja, da nekateri sofinancirani ukrepi pri doseganju oprijemljivih in uporabnih rezultatov in vplivov niso bili preveč uspešni.
While joint actions (see Box 6) typically achieve a tangible impact, the report said, projects relatively often fail to see their results taken forward and put into practice. 
Skupni ukrepi (glej okvir 6) običajno sicer imajo oprijemljiv vpliv, navaja poročilo, vendar razmeroma pogosto prihaja do tega, da se rezultati projektov nadalje ne razvijajo in ne uporabijo v praksi.
Among other reasons this was due to insufficient attention being paid to key barriers to implementation and engagement of relevant enablers71. 
Med drugim je tako tudi zato, ker se ključnim oviram za izvajanje in vključevanju spodbujevalcev namenja premalo pozornosti71.
84 As regards the five procurement items (see Annex III) that we audited at DG Health and Food Safety and Chafea, we also identified a limited uptake of outputs and evaluation of results. 
84 Sodišče je v zvezi s petimi javnimi naročili (glej Prilogo III) GD za zdravje in varnost hrane ter agencije Chafea, ki jih je revidiralo, prav tako ugotovilo omejeno uporabo izložkov in oceno rezultatov.
Recommendations from final activity and evaluation reports for exercises and workshops/trainings were generally not integrated in action plans whose implementation could be monitored72. 
Priporočila iz končnih poročil o dejavnostih in poročil o oceni vaj in delavnic/usposabljanj na splošno niso bila vključena v akcijske načrte, katerih izvajanje bi bilo mogoče spremljati72.
Two exercises (held in 2011 and 2014) included in our sample of five procurement items covered chemical threats and identified many similar and also some identical issues and recommendations. 
Dva ukrepa (izvedena leta 2011 in 2014), vključena v vzorec petih javnih naročil, sta zajemala kemične nevarnosti, v njunem okviru pa so bili opredeljeni številni podobni problemi in priporočil, nekaj pa celo enakih.
68 Ex post evaluation of the health programme (2008-2013), 2016. 
68 Naknadna ocena zdravstvenega programa (2008–2013), 2016.
69 The text in this paragraph is paraphrased from the ex post evaluation report. 
69 Besedilo v tem odstavku je parafrazirano iz poročila o naknadni oceni.
The use of the terms ‘results’ and ‘impacts’ here is therefore not necessarily aligned with the Court’s methodology. 
Uporaba izrazov „rezultati” in „vplivi” na tem mestu zato ni nujno v skladu z metodologijo Sodišča.