natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Just two of the eight programmes examined (Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein and Ems-Dollart Region) employed a computerised project management system and a database for compiling information to be used when setting indicators. 
Samo dva od osmih pregledanih programov (programa pobude Skupnosti za Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein ter za regijo Ems-Dollart) sta imela računalniški sistem upravljanja projektov in podatkovno zbirko za zbiranje informacij glede kazalnikov.
Systems had been developed separately in different regions of the Member States, but this can only mean higher costs and delays in the implementation of programme monitoring. 
Regije držav članic so sisteme razvile ločeno, kar lahko poveča stroške in zamude pri vzpostavljanju spremljanja programov pobude Skupnosti.
Compared with the shortcomings noted during the CourtŐs audit of Interreg I, there have been improvements to the trans-European nature of projects and cooperation in the implementation of CIPs (see paragraph 7). 
V primerjavi s pomanjkljivostmi, ki jih je Sodišče ugotovilo med revizijo Interreg I, sta se transevropski značaj projektov in sodelovanje pri izvajanju programov pobude Skupnosti okrepila (glej odstavek 7).
However, there are still serious delays and, despite some efforts, a satisfactory solution is still to be found for evaluating the CIŐs impact, owing in part to the imprecision and very broad scope of the objectives set in the guidelines and at CIP level. 
Vendar so bile vseeno ugotovljene velike zamude in kljub nekaterim prizadevanjem še ni zadovoljivega odgovora na vprašanje ocene učinka pobud Skupnosti, deloma zaradi splošnosti in obsežnosti ciljev na ravni smernic in programov pobude Skupnosti.
The guidelines focus on operational procedures but were made available too late and contain over-generalised objectives 80. 
Smernice se osredotočajo na pravila za izvajanje, vendar so bile na voljo prepozno in s preveč splošnimi cilji 80.
With a view to enhancing cooperation, the Commission guidelines contain a definition of the trans-European projects that are to be implemented in every CIP (see paragraphs 13 and 14) and establish stricter requirements concerning implementation. 
Smernice Komisije vsebujejo opredelitev transevropskega projekta, ki ga je treba izvesti v vsakem programu pobude Skupnosti (glej odstavka 13 in 14), in okrepitev zahtev na področju izvajanja, da bi pospešili sodelovanje.
However, not enough thought was given to the matter of implementing cooperation via bodies that are genuinely shared, such as EEIGs. 
Vendar vprašanje izvajanja sodelovanja z resničnimi skupnimi strukturami, kot so evropska gospodarska interesna združenja, še ni bilo dovolj dodelano.
Bodies of this sort are able to represent the various regions concerned and take on the task of implementation (see paragraphs 15 and 16). 
Te strukture lahko predstavljajo različne zadevne regije in so odgovorne za izvajanje (glej odstavka 15 in 16).
No analysis was available to the Commission of the specific situation of eligible areas or the progress that had been made towards achieving the CI objectives or the more specific objectives of CIPs. 
Komisija ni imela na voljo analize o posebnem položaju na območjih, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, in napredku, doseženem pri uresničevanju ciljev pobude Skupnosti ali posebnih ciljev programov pobude Skupnosti.
The new guidelines do not contain objectives that are targeted and measurable. 
Nove smernice ne predvidevajo ciljno naravnanih in merljivih ciljev.
If no choices setting concrete objectives at CIP level are made, implementation of the CI will lead to the dilution of resources. 
Ker na ravni programov pobude Skupnosti niso bili določeni konkretni cilji, bo izvajanje pobude Skupnosti privedlo do razdelitve sredstev.
The Commission has not established common indicators which would allow the progress achieved through implementation of the Initiative to be measured globally at Community level (see paragraphs 17 to 25). 
Komisija ni določila skupnih kazalnikov, s katerimi bi na splošni ravni Skupnosti izmerili napredek, dosežen pri izvajanju pobude (glej odstavke 17 do 25).
As regards Strand A, no solution has been found, using the present characteristics of the NUTS nomenclature, to the problem of the existence, in a number of Member States, of areas which are too large to allow effective cooperation (see paragraph 26). 
Pri usmeritvi A se zaradi trenutnih značilnosti nomenklature NUTS ni našla rešitev za vprašanje območij v nekaterih državah članicah, ki so prevelika, da bi omogočila dejansko sodelovanje (glej odstavek 26).
The Commission guidelines and the working papers produced to help the Member States with programme planning were published late, after the Member States had started work on preparing their CIP proposals. 
Smernice Komisije in delovni dokumenti za pomoč državam članicam pri izdelavi programov so bili objavljeni pozno, ko se je priprava predlogov pobude Skupnosti v državah članicah že začela.
This delayed the implementation of the CIPs and may have resulted in programmes of a mediocre quality (see paragraphs 28 and 29). 
To je povzročilo zamude pri izvajanju programov pobude Skupnosti, poleg tega so zaradi tega lahko nastali premalo kakovostni programi (glej odstavka 28 in 29).
The procedure for examining CIP proposals must be improved 84. 
Postopke za preverjanje predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti je treba izboljšati 84.
The criteria for examining the quality of programme proposals submitted by the Member States were lacking in detail and inadequately prepared. 
Merila za preverjanje kakovosti predlogov programov, ki so jih predložile države članice, niso bila dovolj natančno določena in pripravljena.
The procedure for examining CIP proposals did not always result in the desired improvements (see paragraphs 31 to 33(a)). 
Postopek preverjanja predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti ni vedno privedel do želenih izboljšanj (glej odstavke 31 do 33(a)).
Delays of this nature limit the time available for developing projects and mean a more or less lengthy interruption in the process of cooperation between eligible regions in the Member States. 
Te zamude skrajšujejo obdobje, v katerem je mogoče razviti projekte, in povzročajo bolj ali manj dolgo prekinitev v procesu sodelovanja med regijami držav članic, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje.
As a result, commitment appropriations were reallocated in 2000 and payment appropriations were under-utilised throughout the first four years of the period (see paragraphs 35 to 39). 
Povzročile so ponovno razdelitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti za leto 2000 in nizko porabo odobritev plačil v prvih štirih letih obdobja (glej odstavke 35 do 39).
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/17 Preparation and the start of implementation are generally characterised by cooperation 86. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/17 Priprava in začetek izvajanja v glavnem potekata v sodelovanju 86.
Most programmes benefited from a preliminary process of consultation with potential project partners. 
Predhodni proces posvetovanja z morebitnimi nosilci projektov je bil izveden za večino programov.
However, as no choices ensued, this process led to CIPs that were poorly targeted (see paragraphs 41 and 42). 
Ker proces ni privedel do izbire, so bili programi pobude Skupnosti premalo ciljno naravnani (glej odstavka 41 in 42).
CIPs were constructed around shared implementing bodies and financial elements. 
Vzpostavljeni so bili skupni organi za izvajanje ter skupni finančni elementi za programe pobude Skupnosti.
This effectively strengthened cooperation between all the partners. 
Sodelovanje med vsemi partnerji se je dejansko okrepilo.
However, there is still room for improvement: on the one hand, the absence of bodies that were genuinely shared to represent the various Member States conferred an artificial role on the managing authorities (see paragraphs 43 and 44); on the other hand, the spirit of cooperation that was supposed to characterise the constitution of JTSs was not always in evidence, and in several cases the principle of a single financial plan was not fully respected because the resources allocated to the SFs and, more specifically, to the CIs were assigned by Member States (see paragraphs 45 to 50). 
Vendar so še vedno možne izboljšave: na eni strani imajo organi upravljanja zaradi odsotnosti resničnih skupnih struktur, ki bi zastopale različne države članice, umetno vlogo (glej odstavka 43 in 44); na drugi strani duh sodelovanja, ki bi moral prevladati pri oblikovanju skupnih tehničnih sekretariatov, ni bil vedno upoštevan in enotnost finančnega načrta večkrat ni bila v celoti upoštevana zaradi razdelitve sredstev, dodeljenih strukturnim skladom in zlasti pobudam Skupnosti, po posameznih državah članicah (glej odstavke 45 do 50).
Analyses are generally integrated but of little use; no connection exists between analyses and the definition of programme measures; the added value of projets needs to be enhanced 88. 
Analize so v glavnem celostne, vendar malo uporabne; med analizami in opredelitvijo ukrepov programov in projektov ni povezave, njihovo dodano vrednost pa bi bilo treba povečati 88.
Since the ex ante assessors usually contributed to the preparation and drafting of the CIPs, they are unable to provide the wholly independent critical opinion that is required of them (see paragraph 52). 
Predhodni ocenjevalci, ki so na splošno prispevali k pripravi in izdelavi programov pobude Skupnosti, ne morejo dati popolnoma neodvisnega kritičnega mnenja, ki se od njih zahteva (glej odstavek 52).
The analyses which are supposed to underlie any decisions concerning CIP priorities and measures take time and a good deal of effort necessitating the involvement of experts. 
Analize, na katerih bi morala temeljiti določitev prednostnih nalog in ukrepov programov pobude Skupnosti, zahtevajo veliko dela in časa.
Although they usually cover the eligible region as a whole, the analyses are of little use, in particular because the information that they incorporate does not establish a regional point of departure against which the indicators are to measure CIP impact. 
Čeprav so analize regije, ki izpolnjuje pogoje, na splošno celostne, so kljub temu malo uporabne, predvsem zato, ker se informacije, ki jih vsebujejo, ne uporabljajo za opredelitev začetnega stanja v regiji, na podlagi katerega bi morali kazalniki oceniti učinek programov pobude Skupnosti.
Where the results of these analyses are contradicted by the Ôbottom-upŐ consultation process, the programmes should explain why (see paragraphs 55 to 57). 
Če se v procesu posvetovanja od spodaj navzgor oddalji od rezultatov teh analiz, bi programi morali pojasniti vzroke za to (glej odstavke 55 do 57).
Moreover, the problems identified are of a general nature and are not specifically caused by the existence of borders, although for some CIPs measures (on the environment and territorial concerns linked to the ESDP, etc.) are justified because the borders appear per se to constitute an obstacle (see paragraph 58). 
Poleg tega so opredeljene težave splošne in ne nastajajo ravno zaradi meja, čeprav so ukrepi (okolje, ozemeljski vidiki, povezani z EPPR, itd.) za nekatere programe pobude Skupnosti utemeljeni, ker se meje po svoji naravi kažejo kot ovira (glej odstavek 58).
Finally, the causal links between these analyses and the CIP priorities are unclear. 
Vzročne povezave med temi analizami in prednostnimi nalogami programov pobude Skupnosti so nejasne.
Both the stated objectives and the priorities and measures derive from other concerns than that of targeting actions to resolve specific border-related problems. 
Cilji ter prednostne naloge in ukrepi so bili določeni na podlagi drugih argumentov in ne zaradi reševanja posebnih mejnih težav s ciljno naravnanimi ukrepi.
Although the sharing of implementing bodies is conducive to cooperation, it has not resulted in a targeted strategy (see paragraphs 59 to 63). 
Enotnost organov za izvajanje programov pobude Skupnosti kljub spodbujanju sodelovanja ni privedla do ciljno naravnane strategije (glej odstavke 59 do 63).
Strand C programmes are the least well defined, in that they offer vague specific guidelines without the ex ante evaluation that would have served to clarify needs. 
Programi v okviru usmeritve C so najslabše opredeljeni, ker zaradi odsotnosti predhodne ocene, ki bi lahko določila njihove potrebe, kopičijo nejasne specifične smernice.
That it was impossible to define indicators also demonstrates that the Commission was not entirely prepared for the introduction of this Strand (see paragraphs 24, 57, 62 and 72). 
Nezmožnost določitve kazalnikov kaže tudi, da Komisija ni bila dovolj pripravljena na uvedbo te usmeritve (glej odstavke 24, 57, 62, 72).
There is no point in assessing the complementarity of CIPs unless they are more tightly focused (see paragraphs 64 and 65). 
Dopolnjevanje programov pobude Skupnosti je vredno pregledati, le če so njihovi cilji bolje določeni (glej odstavka 64 in 65).
Most of the first projects adopted were prepared and will be implemented through cooperation. 
Za pripravo in nadaljnjo izvedbo večine prvih sprejetih projektov je bilo značilno sodelovanje.
However, projects do not always contribute significantly to the resolution of border-related problems, as some are limited to the exchange of experience or exist irrespective of the proximity of a border. 
Prispevek projektov k reševanju težav, povezanih z mejami, kljub temu ni vedno velik, ker se nekateri projekti omejujejo na izmenjavo izkušenj ali niso povezani z obstojem meja.
In the CourtŐs view there is too little added value, mainly by virtue of the imprecise nature of the stated objectives and the broad scope of the measures for each CIP (see paragraphs 66 to 69). 
Sodišče meni, da je ta dodana vrednost premajhna predvsem zaradi nejasnih ciljev in obsega ukrepov vsakega programa pobude Skupnosti (glej odstavke 66 do 69).
The available tools are inadequate to the task of measuring the impact of CIPs in relation to their objectives 95. 
Razpoložljiva orodja niso primerna za merjenje učinka programov pobude Skupnosti z vidika njihovih ciljev 95.
The CIPs contain objectives at global level and at that of priorities and measures. 
Programi pobude Skupnosti vsebujejo cilje na splošni ravni ter na ravni prednostnih nalog in ukrepov.
These objectives do not result from choices made in order to resolve specific border-related problems, and they were not further broken down (see paragraphs 71 and 72). 
Niso posledica odločitev, sprejetih za reševanje posebnih težav, povezanih z mejami, in njihova povezava ni opazna (glej odstavka 71 in 72).
The many indicators set for the CIPs embody the objectives inadequately or not at all. 
Številni kazalniki programov pobude Skupnosti prikazujejo cilje samo nezadostno ali sploh ne.
They exist in response to an obligation rather than to a need to measure the progress achieved against the stated objectives. 
Obstajajo bolj zaradi obveznosti kot potrebe po merjenju napredka z vidika določenih ciljev.
Moreover, some indicators need to be clarified and the sources of information need to be defined more precisely. 
Poleg tega bi bilo treba določiti nekatere kazalnike in natančno navesti vire informacij.
Although efforts were made to quantify some indicators, these bear no relation to the initial analysis and concern largely irrelevant objectives. 
Obstajalo je prizadevanje za kvantifikacijo nekaterih kazalnikov, vendar ni temeljilo na osnovni analizi in je zadevalo samo malo pomembne cilje.
In most cases, the computer application that should enable the statistical data necessary for the indicators to be collected is still non-existent (see paragraphs 73 to 78). 
V večini pregledanih primerov računalniško orodje za zbiranje statističnih podatkov o kazalnikih še ne obstaja (glej odstavke 73 do 78).
Recommendations 97. 
Priporočila 97.
For the current period: (a) the system of indicators adopted for each CIP should be improved and simplified in order to give a more valid measure of impact, also bearing in mind the weaknesses that were highlighted; (b) the selection criteria for new projects that might benefit from the appropriations that have yet to be committed for each CIP should be strengthened so as to improve the response to specific border-related problems. 
Za sedanje obdobje: (a) treba bi bilo izboljšati in poenostaviti sisteme kazalnikov, uporabljenih za vsak program pobude Skupnosti, da bi lahko koristno izmerili njihov učinek ob upoštevanju drugje ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti; (b) pri novih projektih, ki bi lahko prejeli sredstva, ki jih je še treba dodeliti vsakemu programu pobude Skupnosti, je treba okrepiti izbirna merila, da bi rešili posebne težave, povezane z mejami.
C 303/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 98. 
C 303/18 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 98.
If the Initiative is renewed after 2006: (a) a study should be launched to determine what problems exist in connection with border areas and in which areas Interreg could offer added value as compared with traditional Objective 1 and 2 interventions; (b) for each Interreg strand, the Commission should use the information that it has received concerning the situation in eligible areas to draw up priorities and establish concrete objectives. 
Pri morebitnem podaljšanju pobude po letu 2006: (a) bi bilo treba narediti analizo, s katero bi ugotovili, katere težave, povezane z mejami, so ostale in za katere ima Interreg večjo vrednost v primerjavi s tradicionalnimi pomočmi ciljev 1 in 2; (b) bi morala Komisija za vsako od usmeritev Interreg določiti konkretne cilje, ki se ji zdijo prednostni, in pri tem upoštevati predložene informacije o položaju na območjih, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje.
It should then propose a common system of indicators for each Strand with which to monitor progress; (c) there is a need for detailed criteria for the assessment of CIP proposals. 
Nato bi morala za vsako usmeritev predlagati skupni sistem kazalnikov, ki bo omogočil spremljanje doseženega napredka; (c) bi bilo treba določiti podrobna merila za ocenjevanje predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti.
With clearer CI objectives, projects could then be expected to offer greater added value; (d) the analyses requested for each CIP should serve as a basis for setting objectives and measuring progress; (e) the guidelines, working papers and other information intended as a tool for the preparation of CIP proposals should be made available before preparation begins; (f) the role of ex ante assessors and the content of their evaluations should be clarified, as it is not always easy to reconcile the task of helping to draft CIP proposals with that of making a critical examination of programme content; (g) the usefulness of the information in the programme complement should be considered with a view to reducing content; (h) the financial resources allocated to the Initiative should be held in common rather than assigned by Member State; (i) the work begun on legal instruments for cooperation should continue so that they can be applied to Interreg. 
Omogočila bi proaktiven pristop do držav članic, da bi že na začetku povečali kakovost predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti in ustreznost informacij, ki jih vsebujejo; to bi skupaj s razjasnitvijo ciljev pobude Skupnosti omogočilo oblikovanje projektov z večjo dodano vrednostjo; (d) morata določitev ciljev in merjenje napredka temeljiti na analizah, zahtevanih za vsak program pobude Skupnosti; (e) bi morale biti smernice, delovni dokumenti in druge informacije, ki se uporabljajo za pripravo predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti, na voljo pred začetkom priprave; (f) bi bilo treba pojasniti vlogo predhodnega ocenjevalca in vsebino njegove ocene, ker ni vedno lahko uskladiti naloge pomoči pri izdelavi predlogov programa pobude Skupnosti in naloge kritičnega ocenjevanja njegove vsebine; (g) bi bilo treba preučiti koristnost informacij, upoštevanih v programskem dopolnilu, da bi lahko skrčili njegovo vsebino; (h) se finančnih sredstev, dodeljenih pobudi, ne bi smelo dodeliti posameznim državam članicam, ampak bi morala biti skupna; (i) bi bilo treba nadaljevati začeto delo v zvezi s pravnimi instrumenti sodelovanja, da bi omogočili njihovo uporabo v okviru Interrega.
The Interreg CI promotes cooperation between partners in different Member States and contributes to the opening of borders. 
Pobuda Skupnosti Interreg partnerjem iz različnih držav članic omogoča, da delajo skupaj, in prispeva k odpiranju meja.
At all stages of its implementation Interreg brings together a number of Member States and regions. 
Na vseh stopnjah izvajanja združuje več držav članic in njihovih regij.
It will benefit, during the rest of the 2000 to 2006 programming period, from efforts with regard to indicators, the measurement of impact and selection criteria. 
Zasluži si, da se še v programskem obdobju 2000–2006 ohrani prizadevanja na področju kazalnikov, merjenja učinka in izbirnih meril.
Looking ahead to the next period, should the Commission decide to renew the Initiative after 2006, there should also be efforts focusing mainly on programme planning and the conditions of implementation. 
Poleg tega bi si bilo treba v pričakovanju naslednjega obdobja, če namerava Komisija podaljšati pobudo po letu 2006, še naprej prizadevati za izboljšave zlasti pri zasnovi in pogojih izvajanja.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 1 July 2004. 
To poročilo je sprejelo Računsko sodiče v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 1. julija 2004.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/19 Table 1 From the basic Community Structural Funds legislation to projects receiving ERDF assistance 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/19 Tabela 1 Od osnovne zakonodaje skupnosti o strukturnih skladih k projektom upravičencev do pomoči ESRR Kaj Kdo Uredba (ES) št.