natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
9.2. Thischapteralsogivesinformationontheresultsof the Court’s audits of the Agencies of the European Union and other decentralised bodies as well as of the European Schools. 
9.2 Topoglavjevsebujetudiinformacijeorezultatihrevizij, ki jih je Računsko sodišče izvedlo v agencijah Evropske unije in drugih decentraliziranih organih ter evropskih šolah.
Specific characteristics of the policy group 9.3. Administrativeexpendituremainlycomprisesexpen­ diture for human resources (salaries, allowances and pensions) and expenditure for buildings, equipment, energy, communications, and information technology. 
Posebne značilnosti te skupine politik 9.3 Medupravneodhodkesodijopredvsemodhodkiza kadrovske vire (osebni prejemki, dodatki in pokojnine) ter odhodki za zgradbe, opremo, energetiko, komunikacije in informacijsko tehnologijo.
9.4. This chapter also covers expenditure considered in the general budget as operational although its purpose and object is in most cases the functioning of the Commission’s adminis­ tration rather than policy delivery. 
9.4 V tem poglavju so obravnavani tudi odhodki, ki so v splošnem proračunu obravnavani kot operativni odhodki, čeprav sta njihov namen in cilj v večini primerov delovanje uprave Komisije, ne pa izvajanje politike.
This expenditure includes the following titles of the general budget: Title 14 (‘taxation and customs union’), Title 24 (‘fight against fraud’), Title 25 (‘Commission’s policy coordination and legal advice’), Title 26 (‘Commission’s administration’), Title 27 (‘budget’) and Title 29 (‘statistics’). 
Ti odhodki zajemajo naslednje naslove splošnega proračuna: naslov 14 („obdavčenje in carinska unija“), naslov 24 („boj proti goljufijam“), naslov 25 („usklajevanje politike Komisije in pravno svetovanje“), naslov 26 („upravna služba Komisije“), naslov 27 („proračun“) in naslov 29 („statistika“).
Some of these titles also include operational expen­ diture. 
Nekateri od teh naslovov zajemajo tudi operativne odhodke.
Title 27 includes for 2009 an amount of 200 million euro as ‘Temporary and lump-sum compensation for the new Member States’. 
Naslov 27 za leto 2009 zajema znesek 200 milijonov EUR kot „začasna in pavšalna nadome­ stila za nove države članice“.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 197 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 9.5. Themainrisksintheadministrativeandotherexpen­ diture policy group are non-compliance with the provisions on procurement, the implementation of contracts, recruitment procedures and the calculation of salaries and allowances. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 197 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A 9.5 Glavnatveganjavskupinipolitik,kizajemaupravnein druge odhodke, so neupoštevanje določb o javnih naročilih, izvajanju pogodb, postopkih zaposlovanja ter izračunavanju osebnih prejemkov in dodatkov.
TheCourt’soverallauditapproachandmethodologyis described in Part 2 of Annex 1.1. For the audit of Adminis­ trative expenditure: — a sample of 57 transactions, drawn randomly from all the administrative expenditure referred to in paragraphs 9.3 and 9.4, was tested; — the Court assessed the compliance of the supervisory and control systems (1) applied by each Institution with the requirements of the Financial Regulation; — the Court also reviewed the management representations of four Commission’s Directorates General and Offices primarily responsible for administrative expenditure. 
Pri revidiranju upravnih odhodkov je Sodišče: — preizkusilo vzorec s 57 transakcijami, naključno izbranimi med vsemi upravnimi odhodki iz odstavkov 9.3 in 9.4, — ocenilo, ali so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi(1), ki jih uporabljajo posamezne institucije, skladni z zahtevami finančne uredbe, — preučilo tudi poslovodske predstavitve štirih generalnih direktoratov in uradov Komisije, ki so v največji meri odgovorni za upravne odhodke.
TheCourtalsoauditedthefollowingselectedtopicson the basis of specific samples: (a) engagement of temporary and contract agents in all Insti­ tutions, (b) payment of social allowances to staff in all Institutions in higher risk areas (household allowance for families without dependent children, national allowances not deducted from those of a similar nature paid by the Institutions when the spouse is deemed to receive income or benefits from outside the Institutions, national allowances deducted from those of a similar nature paid by the Institutions and not updated for more than one year), (c) procurement contracts in all Institutions except the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, (d) procurement contracts awarded following a negotiated procedure due to urgency in all Institutions except the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor. _____________ (1) Ex-ante and ex-post controls, internal audit function, exception reporting and internal control standards. 
9.7 Sodišče je na podlagi posebnih vzorcev revidiralo tudi naslednje izbrane teme: (a) zaposlovanje začasnih in pogodbenih uslužbencev v vseh institucijah; (b) izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov uslužbencem v vseh insti­ tucijah na področjih z večjim tveganjem (gospodinjski dodatek za družine brez vzdrževanih otrok, nacionalni dodatki, ki se ne odštejejo od podobnih dodatkov, ki jih izplačajo institucije, kadar se šteje, da zakonec prejema prihodke ali dodatke iz virov zunaj institucij, nacionalni dodatki, ki se odštejejo od podobnih dodatkov, ki jih izplačajo institucije in več kot leto dni niso bili posodob­ ljeni); (c) pogodbe za javna naročila v vseh institucijah, razen pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic in Evropskem nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov; (d) pogodbe za javna naročila, ki so bile zaradi nujnih razlogov sklenjene po postopku s pogajanji, v vseh insti­ tucijah, razen pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic in Evropskem nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov. _____________ (1) Predhodne in naknadne kontrole, funkcija notranje revizije, poročanje o izjemah in standardi notranjega kontroliranja.
In addition, the Court performed an in-depth assessment of supervisory and control systems in the Court of Justice, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče izvedlo poglobljeno oceno nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov na Sodišču Evropske unije, pri Evropskem varuhu člove­ kovih pravic in Evropskem nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov.
This assessment included the examination of an additional sample of transactions of payments relating to human resources and to other adminis­ trative expenditure. 
Ta ocena je zajemala preučitev dodatnega vzorca plačil, povezanih s kadrovskimi viri in drugimi upravnimi odhodki.
EN 198 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 9.8. TheCourtofAuditorsisauditedbyanindependent external audit firm (2) which issued an audit report on the financial statements for the financial year from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 and an assurance report concerning the regularity of the use of the Court's resources, and the control procedures in place for the financial year from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 (see paragraph 9.22). 
SL 198 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A 9.8 Revizijo Računskega sodišča izvaja neodvisno zunanje revizijsko podjetje (2), ki je izdalo revizijsko poročilo o raču­ novodskih izkazih za proračunsko leto od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 in poročilo o zanesljivosti glede pravilnosti porabe sredstev Sodišča ter vzpostavljenih kontrolnih postopkov za proračunsko leto od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 (glej odstavek 9.22).
On the basis of the sample of 57 transactions, the audit found the payments as a whole to be free from material error. 
Pri reviziji je bilo na podlagi pregleda vzorca s 57 tran­ sakcijami ugotovljeno, da v plačilih kot celoti ni pomembnih napak.
COMPLIANCE OF SYSTEMS WITH THE FINANCIAL REGULATION 9.10. The results of the examination of systems are summarised in Annex 9.2. 
SKLADNOST SISTEMOV S FINANČNO UREDBO 9.10 RezultatipreverjanjasistemovsopovzetivPrilogi9.2.
The Court’s audit of the compliance of the systems designed to ensure the regularity of transactions with the provisions of the Financial Regulation (see paragraph 9.6) found no material weakness. 
Sodišče pri reviziji skladnosti sistemov, zasnovanih za zagota­ vljanje pravilnosti transakcij, z določbami finančne uredbe (glej odstavek 9.6) ni našlo pomembnih slabosti.
OBSERVATIONS ON SPECIFIC INSTITUTIONS 9.12. Thespecificobservationsthatfollowandwhichare presented by Institution or body of the European Union are based on the Court’s audit (a) of the supervisory and control systems applied by each Institution and (b) on the selected topics (see paragraphs 9.6 and 9.7). 
OPAŽANJA O POSAMEZNIH INSTITUCIJAH 9.12 Naslednja posebna opažanja Sodišča, ki so predsta­ vljena po institucijah ali organih Evropske unije, temeljijo na njegovi reviziji (a) nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov, ki jih uporabljajo posamezne institucije, ter (b) izbranih tem (glej odstavka 9.6 in 9.7).
These findings do not call into question the assessments set out in paragraphs 9.9 and 9.10 as they are not material to administrative expenditure as a whole but are significant in the context of the individual Institution concerned. 
Oceni v odstavkih 9.9 in 9.10 zaradi teh ugotovitev nista vprašljivi, ker vpliv teh ugotovitev ni pomemben za upravne odhodke kot celoto, ampak za insti­ tucije, na katere se ugotovitve nanašajo.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION The Commission welcomes the Court of Auditors' positive assessment that the administrative expenditure was free from material error. _____________ (2) PricewaterhouseCoopers, Société à responsabilité limitée, Réviseur d'Entreprises. 
9.9 ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Komisija z zadovoljstvom sprejema pozitivno oceno Računskega sodišča, da v upravnih odhodkih ni bilo pomembnih napak. _____________ (2) PricewaterhouseCoopers, družba z omejeno odgovornostjo (réviseur d'entreprises).
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 199 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Parliament Engagement of temporary and contractual agents 9.13. The examination of the procedures for the engagement of other agents of the Institutions (temporary and contract staff) established that, in five cases out of 20, documents evidencing compliance with the rules related to the fulfilment of military or other obligations had not been provided. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 199 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A Parlament Zaposlovanje začasnih in pogodbenih uslužbencev 9.13 Sodišče je pri preverjanju postopkov za zaposlovanje drugih uslužbencev institucij (začasnih in pogodbenih) ugoto­ vilo, da v petih od 20 primerov niso bila predložena dokazila o upoštevanju pravil o izpolnjevanju obveznosti služenja voja­ škega roka ali drugih obveznosti.
THE REPLY OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT As regards the documents to be provided as proof of fulfilment of military obligations, Parliament wishes to state the following: Parliament acknowledges that, in the light of the gradual abolition of military service in the Member States, fulfilment of such obligations was not the subject of systematic checks in connection with the recruitment of temporary and contract staff until the start of the second half of 2008. 
9.13 ODGOVORI PARLAMENTA V zvezi z dokumenti, ki dokazujejo spoštovanje vojaških obveznosti, želi Parlament pripomniti naslednje: Parlament priznava, da, glede na postopno ukinjanje vojaških obvez­ nosti v posameznih državah članicah, pri zaposlovanju začasnega in pogodbenega osebja do začetka druge polovice leta 2008 ni sistema­ tično preverjal spoštovanja teh obveznosti.
However, since then DG Personnel has asked applicants to provide proof of fulfilment of their military obligations. 
Vendar pa GD za kadrovske zadeve od takrat naprej od kandidatov zahteva predložitev dokazila o spoštovanju vojaških obveznosti.
The Recruitment and Staff Transfers Unit has a database which gives details of the military obligations to be met in each Member State and systematically verifies that those obligations have been fulfilled when concluding contracts with other servants. 
Oddelek za zaposlovanje in prerazporejanje kadrov ima tako bazo podatkov, v kateri so opisane vojaške obveznosti v državah, in siste­ matsko preverja spoštovanje teh obveznosti pri sestavi zaposlitvenih pogodb.
The instances of non-compliance highlighted by the Court concern temporary and contract staff recruited by Parliament for the first time prior to the introduction of these systematic checks. 9.14. 
Primeri neskladnosti, ki jih navaja Sodišče, se navezujejo na začasno/ pogodbeno osebje, zaposleno v Evropskem parlamentu prvič in pred uvedenim sistematskim preverjanjem.
THE REPLY OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT As stipulated in Article 67(2) and Article 68 of the Staff Regu­ lations, it is for the recipients of allowances to notify the Adminis­ tration of any change in their circumstances. 
9.14 ODGOVORI PARLAMENTA V skladu z določbami člena 67(2) in člena 68 statuta morajo prejemniki nadomestil pristojne službe nemudoma obvestiti o vseh spremembah.
This arrangement, based on ‘spontaneous declarations’, may give rise to delays in updating individual entitlements. 
Ta sistem, ki temelji na „spontani izjavi“, lahko privede do morebitne zamude pri posodobitvi individualnih pravic zaposlenih.
With a view to forestalling this risk, Parliament has always taken regular steps to verify the circumstances of its staff. 
Za odpravo teh tveganj je Parlament vedno redno preverjal status svojih uslužbencev.
As from 2010, that verification has been computerised through the introduction of the ‘electronic data sheet’. 
Od leta 2010 to preverjanje poteka avtomatsko na podlagi „elektronskega obrazca“.
This ‘proactive’ procedure will make it possible to verify staff members’ personal and administrative data at least once a year. 
Ta postopek je odslej „proaktiven“ in mora omogočiti najmanj letno preverjanje osebnih in administra­ tivnih podatkov uslužbencev.
Each staff member is required to verify his or her circumstances on a given date and to forward notification of any change, along with the requisite supporting documents, to the department concerned. 
V okviru tega preverjanja lahko zadevni uslužbenec sam preveri svoj status na dan D in pristojno službo s predložitvijo ustrezne dokumentacije obvesti o morebitnih spremembah.
Sums unduly paid to officials and other servants who fail to notify the Administration of changes in their circumstances are recovered. 
Če uslužbenci pristojnih služb ne obvestijo o spremembah stanja, je treba preveč izplačane zneske vrniti.
Payment of social allowances to staff members 9.14. The audit found that, in 16 cases out of 30, information available to the Parliament’s services, in order to ensure that allowances provided for by the Staff Regulations are paid to staff in compliance with relevant community regu­ lations and national legislation, was not up-to-date. 
Izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov uslužbencem 9.14 Medrevizijojebilougotovljeno,dainformacije,kiso jih imele na voljo službe Parlamenta, da bi zagotovile, da se dodatki, določeni v kadrovskih predpisih, uslužbencem izplačajo v skladu z ustreznimi predpisi Unije in nacionalnimi zakoni, v 16 od 30 primerov niso bile posodobljene.
This situation leads to the risk of making incorrect or undue payments if the circumstances of the individual have changed. 
Zato prihaja do tveganja nepravilnih ali neupravičenih izplačil, če se posameznikove okoliščine spremenijo.
Staff should be requested to deliver at appropriate intervals documents confirming their personal situation. 
Od uslužbencev bi morali zahtevati, da v ustreznih razmikih predložijo doku­ mente, ki potrjujejo njihove osebne razmere.
In addition, the Parliament should implement a system for the timely monitoring and control of these documents. 
Poleg tega bi moral Parlament uporabljati sistem za pravočasno spremljanje in kontrolo teh dokumentov.
EN 200 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Organisation and functioning of political groups 9.15. Article12.9oftheParliament’sInternalRulesforthe implementation of the budget, adopted on 27 April 2005, provides that the Internal Auditor’s area of competence does not include the appropriations from Parliament’s budget managed by political groups. 
SL 200 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A Organizacija in delovanje političnih skupin 9.15 Včlenu12.9notranjihpravilParlamentazaizvrše­ vanje proračuna, sprejetih 27. aprila 2005, je določeno, da odobrena proračunska sredstva Parlamenta, ki jih upravljajo politične skupine, ne sodijo v področje pristojnosti notranjega revizorja.
The specific rules on the use of these appropriations (3) require that each political group estab­ lishes its own internal financial rules and implements an internal control system. 
Posebna pravila o uporabi teh sredstev (3) določajo, da mora vsaka politična skupina pripraviti svoja notranja finančna pravila in izvajati notranji kontrolni sistem.
The internal audit function is not mentioned. 
Funkcija notranje revizije ni omenjena.
Only the rules of one out of seven political groups provide for the appointment of an internal auditor. 
Le ena od sedmih političnih skupin je v svojih pravilih določila, da je treba imenovati notranjega revizorja.
The functional independence of political groups does not justify that regulatory provisions on the internal audit function are not applied as regards the use of funds by political groups. 
Funkcionalna neodvisnost političnih skupin ni opravičilo, da se za sredstva, ki jih slednje porabljajo, ne uporabljajo uredbene določbe o funkciji notranje revizije.
9.16. Thesamespecificrulesontheuseofappropriations establish provisions for the carry-over of Parliament’s budget appropriations managed by political groups. They allow political groups to carry-over to the succeeding financial years unused appropriations of a given year, without having to justify this decision(4). 
9.16 Istaposebnapravilaouporabiodobrenihproračun­ skih sredstev vsebujejo določbe o prenosu teh sredstev Parla­ menta, ki jih upravljajo politične skupine, v naslednje leto. Te lahko neporabljena odobrena proračunska sredstva danega leta prenesejo v naslednja proračunska leta brez utemeljitve (4).
These specific provisions, which introduced an exception to the budgetary principle of annuality, do not find a legal basis in the Financial Regulation. 
Te posebne določbe, s katerimi je bila uvedena izjema pri proračunskem načelu enoletnosti, nimajo pravne podlage v finančni uredbi.
Council Procurement 9.17. Intwooutofsixprocurementproceduresaudited,the rules set in the Financial Regulation for the publication of the outcome of the procedure in contract award notices were not respected. 
Svet Javna naročila 9.17 Vdvehodšestihrevidiranihpostopkovjavnihnaročil niso bila upoštevana pravila finančne uredbe glede objave izida postopka v obvestilih o oddaji naročila.
THE REPLY OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Parliament notes the Court’s finding and, in response, intends to discuss the possibility of: — incorporating into the rules governing the use of Item 4 0 0 0 appropriations the requirement that the financial rules adopted by the groups should include a provision laying down the remit and duties of an internal auditor, as provided for in Article 85 of the Financial Regulation, — allowing the groups either to appoint an internal auditor (if their size permits) or to confer those duties on an external auditor, on the understanding that he or she is not the external auditor responsible for examining the group’s accounts. 
9.15 ODGOVORI PARLAMENTA Parlament je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Sodišča in namerava preučiti morebitne možnosti: — da se v pravilnik o uporabi odobrenih sredstev iz proračunske postavke 4 0 0 0 uvede obveznost, da skupine v svoja finančna pravila vključijo formulo za kritje obsega in funkcije notranjega revizorja, kot to določa člen 85 finančne uredbe, — da se skupinam zagotovi možnost uporabe bodisi notranjega revizorja (če velikost skupine to dopušča), ali da se to delo zaupa zunanjemu revizorju, pod pogojem, da ne gre za istega zunanjega revizorja, ki pregleduje računovodske izkaze skupine.
THE REPLY OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT A distinction should be drawn between the budgetary operations conducted by the authorising officer by delegation — who commits and pays appropriations from budget Item 4 0 0 0 in full compliance with the Financial Regulation, and in particular the principle of annuality — and the management of the resources of each political group, which is governed by specific rules adopted by the Bureau on 30 June 2003. 
9.16 ODGOVORI PARLAMENTA Treba je razlikovati proračunske operacije odredbodajalca, ki uporablja sredstva iz proračunske postavke 4 0 0 0 popolnoma v skladu s finančno uredbo, zlasti z načelom enoletnosti, ter upravljanje vsake izmed skupin nad sredstvi v skladu s posebnim pravilnikom, ki ga je sprejelo predsedstvo 30. junija 2003.
Those rules take account of the constraints imposed by the specific nature of the political groups’ role and make explicit provision for the carryover procedure referred to by the Court. 
Ta pravilnik je bil oblikovan, da bi se upoštevale vse posebne potrebe delovanja političnih skupin, in izrecno predvideva postopek, ki ga omenja sodišče.
REPLY OF THE COUNCIL In conformity with Article 149.1 of the Implementing Rules, the General Secretariat of the Council informs systematically and without delay all candidates participating in a tender procedure of the outcome of the procedure as soon as the contracting authority has decided on the award of the contract. 
9.17 ODGOVOR SVETA V skladu s členom 149.1 izvedbenih pravil generalni sekretariat Sveta vse kandidate, ki sodelujejo pri razpisnem postopku, sistema­ tično in nemudoma obvesti o izidu postopka, takoj ko se naročnik odloči o oddaji naročila.
In addition, the award notice mentioned in Article 118.4 of the Implementing Rules is sent by the central procurement department for publication by the Publications Office as soon as the contract is signed by the authorising officer. 
Poleg tega osrednja služba za javna naročila obvestilo o oddaji naročila iz člena 118.4 izvedbenih pravil pošlje v objavo Uradu za publikacije takoj, ko pogodbo podpiše odredbodajalec.
Unfortunately, in the two cases identified by the Court, the latter informed the central procurement department too late and the delay mentioned in Article 118.4 of the IR was not respected. _____________ (3) Rules adopted by the Bureau of the European Parliament on 30 June 2003, as amended by decisions of 22 March 2006 and 11 July 2007. 
Žal Računsko sodišče v dveh odkritih primerih ni pravočasno obvestilo osrednje službe za javna naročila, zato rok iz člena 118.4 izvedbenih pravil ni bil spoštovan. _____________ (3) Ta pravila je 30. junija 2003 sprejelo predsedstvo Evropskega parla­ menta, pozneje pa so bila spremenjena s sklepoma z dne 22. marca 2006 in 11. julija 2007.
(4) At the end of the financial year 2008, appropriations carried over by political groups amounted to 22 million euro, i.e. 42,5 % of the annual appropriations for 2008. 
(4) Ob koncu proračunskega leta 2008 so odobrena proračunska sred­ stva, ki so jih politične skupine prenesle v naslednje leto, znašala 22 milijonov EUR, kar je 42,5 % odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za leto 2008.
It should be noted that the in the two cases cited by the European Court of Auditors (both with a very limited number of candidates), the latter have no grounds for complaint since they were informed individually immediately of the award decision. 9.18. 
9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 201 Komisija Opozoriti je treba, da v primerih, ki ju je navedlo Evropsko računsko sodišče (oba z zelo majhnim številom kandidatov), kandidati nimajo razlogov za pritožbo, saj so bili posamično takoj obveščeni o dodelitvi naročila.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION The Office for Administration and Payments of Individual Entitlements (PMO) has already taken action to catch up delays in the control of national social allowances and will follow up the detected cases. 
9.18 ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Urad za vodenje in plačevanje posameznih pravic (PMO) je že sprejel ukrepe za zmanjšanje zamud pri kontroli nacionalnih socialnih doda­ tkov in bo spremljal razvoj navedenih primerov.