natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EU-13 countries as a group already in 2016 benefitted from EFSI with a share equal to their share in the EU economy. 
Države EU-13 so kot skupina že leta 2016 izkoristile sredstva sklada EFSI v deležu, ki je bil enak njihovemu deležu v gospodarstvu EU.
By end 2017 their share in EFSI financing amounted to 12%, over-proportional to their cumulative 8.6% share in EU GDP. 
Do konca leta 2017 je njihov delež pri financiranju iz sklada EFSI znašal 12 %, kar pomeni, da je bil nesorazmerno večji od njihovega skupnega 8,6-odstotnega deleža v BDP EU.
The referred Member States have the NPBs with the level of experience and sophistication that is required to perform higher-risk financial products. 
Zadevne države članice imajo nacionalne spodbujevalne banke z izkušnjami in razvitostjo, ki se zahtevajo za izvajanje finančnih produktov z višjim tveganjem.
See comments to paragraph 72 explaining that investment platforms are products that require more advanced technical capacities than the traditional products offered to NPBIs. 
Glejte pripombe k odstavku 72, ki pojasnjujejo, da so naložbene platforme produkti, ki zahtevajo naprednejše tehnične zmogljivosti kot tradicionalni produkti, ki so ponujeni nacionalnim spodbujevalnim bankam in institucijam.
It is therefore not surprising that most experienced and well-developed NPBIs were interested to implement these structures together with the EIB covering a considerable number of Member States (see comment on paragraph 78 below). 
Zato ni presenetljivo, da so bile najizkušenejše in najrazvitejše nacionalne spodbujevalne banke in institucije zainteresirane za izvajanje teh struktur skupaj z EIB, pri čemer pokrivajo precejšnje število držav članic (glejte pripombo k odstavku 78 spodaj).
As of October 2018, the investment platforms approved span 14 Member States and cover a range of sectors, including digital, environment, transport and energy, with a strong focus on small and medium sized companies and mid-cap companies. 
Odobrene naložbene platforme od oktobra 2018 obsegajo 14 držav članic in pokrivajo vrsto sektorjev, vključno z digitalnim, okoljskim, prometnim in energetskim, z močnim poudarkom na malih in srednjih podjetjih ter podjetjih s srednje veliko tržno kapitalizacijo.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 80. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 80.
During its first three years of implementation EFSI has successfully contributed to supporting investments and job creation in the EU. 
Sklad EFSI je v prvi treh letih izvajanja uspešno prispeval k podpiranju naložb in ustvarjanju delovnih mest v EU.
By 17 July 2018, EFSI has helped mobilise EUR 334.8 billion of investment, covering all Member States. 
Do 17. julija 2018 je pomagal privabiti naložbe v višini 334,8 milijarde EUR v vseh državah članicah.
Two thirds of the EUR334.8 billion raised comes from private resources, meaning that the EFSI has also met its objective of mobilising private investment. 
Dve tretjini zneska od zbranih 334,8 milijarde EUR izvirata iz zasebnih virov, kar pomeni, da je sklad EFSI dosegel tudi cilj glede privabljanja zasebnih naložb.
In addition, about 697000 SMEs are expected to benefit from financing supported by EFSI. 
Poleg tega se pričakuje, da bo financiranje ob podpori sklada EFSI koristilo približno 697 000 MSP.
The EIB's Economics Department and the Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) estimate that EFSI operations have already supported more than 750 000 jobs with the figure set to rise to 1.4 million jobs by 2020 compared to the baseline scenario. 
Oddelek EIB za ekonomijo in Skupno raziskovalno središče Komisije (JRC) ocenjujeta, da je bilo z operacijami sklada EFSI v primerjavi z osnovnim scenarijem podprto že več kot 750 000 delovnih mest, pri čemer naj bi se število delovnih mest do leta 2020 povečalo na 1,4 milijona.
Due to its success, EFSI has been extended until the end of 2020, with a view to reaching EUR 500 billion of additional investment by then. 
Sklad je bil zaradi svojega uspeha podaljšan do konca leta 2020, da do tedaj doseže 500 milijard EUR dodatnih naložb.
See also Commission replies to paragraph 33. 
Glejte tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavek 33.
Recommendations 1 – Promoting the justified use of higher-risk EIB products under EFSI In its role as the implementing agent of EFSI, the EIB accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 1 – Spodbuja naj se upravičena uporaba produktov EIB z višjim tveganjem v okviru sklada EFSI EIB kot izvajalec sklada EFSI sprejema to priporočilo.
Recommendation 2 – Encouraging complementarity between EU financial instruments and EU budgetary guarantees The Commission accepts the recommendation and considers that this recommendation has already been addressed through the legislative proposals for the post-2020 MFF. In particular, the 71. 
Priporočilo2 – Spodbuja naj se dopolnjevanje med finančnimi instrumenti EU in proračunskimi jamstvi EU Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in meni, da se je to priporočilo že obravnavalo v okviru zakonodajnih predlogov za večletni finančni okvir po letu 2020.
Commission proposed to streamline and improve the centrally managed EU investment support instruments. 
Zlasti predlaga racionalizacijo in izboljšanje centralno upravljanih instrumentov EU za podporo naložbam.
All investment support instruments, in the field of EU internal policies, are proposed to be implemented under a single, InvestEU Programme under four distinct Policy Windows to ensure complementarity. 
Predlaga se, da se vsi instrumenti za podporo naložbam na področju notranjih politik EU izvajajo v okviru enotnega programa InvestEU znotraj štirih ločenih delov politike, da bi se zagotovilo dopolnjevanje.
This would improve complementarity between different EU investment instruments by avoiding duplications and overlaps. 
S tem bi se izboljšalo dopolnjevanje med različnimi naložbenimi instrumenti EU, saj bi se preprečila podvajanja in prekrivanja.
Recommendation 3 – Improving the assessment of whether potential EFSI projects could have been financed from other sources In its role as the implementing agent of EFSI, the EIB accepts the recommendation and considers it already implemented for EFSI 2.0. 
Priporočilo 3 – Izboljša naj se ocena možnosti za financiranje potencialnih projektov sklada EFSI iz drugih virov EIB kot izvajalec sklada EFSI sprejema to priporočilo in meni, da se že izvaja v zvezi s skladom EFSI 2.0.
In line with the Investment Guidelines, when developing new products under EFSI, the EIB considers that it took this issue into account with the view to propose a wide range of products addressing market needs while encouraging private investment in projects, without crowding out private market finance. 
EIB meni, da je v skladu z naložbenimi smernicami pri razvijanju novih produktov v okviru sklada EFSI to vprašanje že upoštevala pri pripravi predlogov za najrazličnejše produkte, ki obravnavajo potrebe trga, hkrati pa spodbujajo zasebne naložbe v projekte brez izrivanja zasebnega tržnega financiranja.
At operation level, following the entry into force of EFSI 2.0 Regulation, EIB has already included qualitative assessment of additionality, including of market failure or suboptimal investment situations (including the availability of complementary and alternative sources of finance and their terms and conditions). 
Na operativni ravni je EIB po začetku veljavnosti uredbe o EFSI 2.0 že vključila kvalitativno oceno dodatnosti, vključno z nedelovanjem trga ali neoptimalnimi naložbenimi situacijami (vključno z razpoložljivostjo dopolnilnih in alternativnih virov financiranja ter njihovimi pogoji).
EIB does articulate this assessment in line with the enhanced requirements of the EFSI Regulation in the proposals submitted to the Investment Committee. 
EIB pojasnjuje to oceno v skladu s strožjimi zahtevami uredbe o EFSI v predlogih, ki jih je predložila naložbenemu odboru.
The EIB recalls that the analysis of crowding out of other sources of finance would need to evidence the true counterfactual. 
Opozarja, da bi bilo treba pri analizi izrivanja drugih virov financiranja jasno dokazati dejanski hipotetični scenarij.
Due to the fragmentation of the financial market, the evidence of the counterfactual is practically impossible. 
Vendar je to zaradi razdrobljenosti finančnega trga praktično nemogoče.
The EFSI multiplier calculation methodologies foresee that any double counting is eliminated as soon as identified and that, at approval, only incremental investment mobilised is accounted for. 
Metodologije sklada EFSI za izračun multiplikatorja predvidevajo, da se vsako dvojno štetje odpravi takoj, ko se ugotovi, in da se ob odobritvi upoštevajo samo dodatne privabljene naložbe.
In the cases that were reviewed by the ECA, the EIB confirms that it adjusted the double counting as soon as the information became available in line with the methodology. 
EIB v primerih, ki jih je pregledalo Evropsko računsko sodišče, potrjuje, da je prilagodila dvojno štetje takoj, ko so bile na voljo informacije v skladu z metodologijo.
The Investment Mobilised reflects the best estimate of the expected investment in the real economy with actual amounts revised at project completion. 
Privabljene naložbe pomenijo najboljšo oceno pričakovanih naložb v realnem gospodarstvu, pri čemer se dejanski zneski revidirajo ob zaključku projekta.
Hence, by definition, the ex-ante Investment Mobilised is an estimate at approval, not an over or under-statement. 
Zato predhodno privabljene naložbe po definiciji predstavljajo oceno ob odobritvi in ne ocene navzgor ali navzdol.
Recommendation 4 – Estimating better the investment mobilised The Commission accepts the recommendation 4.a. (a) For all the investment support instruments for the next MFF, the Commission has proposed a coherent set of indicators for the measurement of expected results in line with the Financial Regulation. 
Priporočilo 4 – Privabljene naložbe naj se bolje ocenijo Komisija sprejema priporočilo 4.a. (a) Komisija v zvezi z vsemi instrumenti za podporo naložbam za naslednji večletni finančni okvir predlaga skladen niz kazalnikov za merjenje pričakovanih rezultatov v skladu s finančno uredbo.
The methodology needs to remain implementable, taking also into account the costs and administrative burden to the final beneficiaries, financial intermediaries, implementing partners and the Commission. (b) The Commission and the EIB accept recommendation 4.b and consider it subsequently implemented after the ECA’s audit. 
Metodologija mora ostati izvedljiva, pri čemer je treba upoštevati tudi stroške in upravno breme končnih upravičencev, finančnih posrednikov, izvajalskih partnerjev in Komisije. (b) Komisija in EIB sprejemata priporočilo 4.b in zanj štejeta, da je bilo naknadno izvedeno po reviziji, ki jo je opravilo Evropsko računsko sodišče.
In this respect, the EFSI Steering Board already approved, in October 2018, an updated EIB EFSI multiplier calculation methodology. 
V zvezi s tem je usmerjevalni odbor sklada EFSI oktobra2018 že odobril posodobljeno metodologijo za izračun multiplikatorja EIB za sklad EFSI.
In addition, the EIF EFSI Multiplier Methodology was updated in March 2018. 
Marca 2018 je bila posodobljena tudi metodologija za izračun multiplikatorja Evropskega investicijskega sklada za sklad EFSI.
Those methodologies are applied at approval stage ensuring that only incremental investment mobilised, is accounted for towards the EFSI target. 
Navedeni metodologiji se uporabljata ob odobritvi, s čimer se zagotovi, da se pri ciljih sklada EFSI upoštevajo samo dodatne privabljene naložbe.
Both of the already approved updates clarify the concept of estimated incremental EFSI Eligible Investment Mobilised in particular in reference to subsequent financing under EFSI and co-investments. 6 
Obe že odobreni posodobitvi pojasnjujeta pojem predvidenih dodatnih upravičenih privabljenih naložb sklada EFSI, zlasti v zvezi z naknadnim financiranjem v okviru sklada EFSI in sonaložbami.
Geographic concentration cannot be calculated solely based on the volume of signed financing operations in each Member State. 
Geografske koncentracije ni mogoče izračunati samo na podlagi obsega poslov financiranja, sklenjenih v vsaki državi članici.
When looking at geographic concentration the size of economies and population of individual Member States has to be taken into account. 
Pri preučitvi geografske koncentracije je treba upoštevati velikost gospodarstev in prebivalstva posameznih držav članic.
This includes enhanced cooperation with NPBs including through setting up of investment platforms and enhanced cooperation models (e.g. EIF-NPI Equity platform) and more targeted local outreach, in particular through the Advisory Hub. 
To vključuje okrepljeno sodelovanje z nacionalnimi spodbujevalnimi bankami, tudi z vzpostavljanjem naložbenih platform in modelov okrepljenega sodelovanja (npr. platforme za lastniško financiranje za olajšanje sodelovanja med Evropskim investicijskim skladom in nacionalnimi spodbujevalnimi institucijami), in bolj ciljno usmerjeno lokalno pokritost, zlasti prek svetovalnega vozlišča.
Recommendation 5 – Improving the geographical spread of EFSI supported investment The Commission and EIB accept this recommendation. 7 
Priporočilo 5 – Izboljša naj se geografska porazdelitev naložb, ki jih podpira sklad EFSI Komisija in EIB sprejemata to priporočilo. 7
Audit team This ECA’s special reports set out the results of its audits of EU policies and programmes, or of management-related topics from specific budgetary areas. 
Revizijska ekipa Posebna poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča predstavljajo rezultate njegovih revizij politik in programov EU ali tem v zvezi z upravljanjem na posameznih področjih proračuna.
The audit was led by ECA Member Leo Brincat, supported by Romuald Kayibanda, Head of Private Office and Annette Farrugia, Private Office Attaché; Ralph Otte, Principal Manager; Gabriela-Elena Deica, Head of Task; Martin Puc, Head of Task; James McQuade, Mariya Zhekova, Mircea-Cristian Martinescu and Felipe Andres Miguelez, Auditors. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Leo Brincat, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njegovega kabineta Romuald Kayibanda in atašejka v njegovem kabinetu Annette Farrugia, vodilni upravni uslužbenec Ralph Otte, vodji naloge Gabriela-Elena Deica in Martin Puc ter revizorji James McQuade, Mariya Zhekova, Mircea-Cristian Martinescu in Felipe Andres Miguelez.
53 From left to right: Romuald Kayibanda, James McQuade, Gabriela-Elena Deica, Annette Farrugia, Leo Brincat, Martin Puc, Valérie Tempez-Erasmi. 
54 Od leve proti desni: Romuald Kayibanda, James McQuade, Gabriela-Elena Deica, Annette Farrugia, Leo Brincat, Martin Puc, Valérie Tempez-Erasmi.
Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 4.7.2017 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 18.10.2018 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 8.1.2019 Commission’s (or other auditee’s) official replies received in all languages 24.1.2019 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1711-8 doi:10.2865/074156 QJ-AB-19-001-EN-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1681-4 doi:10.2865/295861 QJ-AB-19-001-EN-Q 
Dogodek Datum Sprejetje revizijskega memoranduma / začetek revizije 4.7.2017 Osnutek poročila uradno poslan Komisiji (ali drugemu revidirancu) 18.10.2018 Sprejetje končnega poročila po razčiščevalnem postopku 8.1.2019 Prejeti uradni odgovori Komisije (ali drugega revidiranca) v vseh jezikih 24.1.2019 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1676-0 doi:10.2865/86948 QJ-AB-19-001-SL-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1687-6 doi:10.2865/206447 QJ-AB-19-001-SL-Q
The European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI) helps finance strategic investments in key areas such as infrastructure, research and innovation, education, renewable energy and energy efficiency. 
Evropski sklad za strateške naložbe (sklad EFSI) pomaga financirati strateške naložbe na ključnih področjih, kot so infrastruktura, raziskave in inovacije, izobraževanje, obnovljiva energija in energetska učinkovitost.
It acts as an EU budgetary guarantee given to the EIB Group. 
Je proračunska garancija EU, dana skupini EIB.
The aim of the EFSI is to enable the EIB and the EIF to provide additional funding to eligible projects in the EU and mobilise additional private and public investment for these projects. 
Cilj sklada EFSI je omogočiti, da EIB in Evropski investicijski sklad zagotavljata dodatno financiranje upravičenim projektom v EU ter privabljata dodatne zasebne in javne naložbe zanje.
We concluded that the EFSI helped the EIB to provide more higher-risk finance for investments, financed many investment projects that could not otherwise have taken place, attracted additional public and private investment to those projects and supported investments in many policy sectors across the EU. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je sklad EFSI pripomogel k temu, da je EIB zagotovila dodatno financiranje z višjim tveganjem za naložbe, financirala veliko projektov, ki jih drugače ni bi bilo mogoče izvesti, privabila dodatne javne in zasebne naložbe zanje in podpirala naložbe v mnogih sektorjih po vsej EU.
However, we found that some EFSI support just replaced other EIB and EU financing, part of the finance went to projects that could have used other sources of public or private finance, estimates of additional investment attracted by EFSI were sometimes overstated and most investments went to a few larger EU 15 Member States with well-established national promotional banks. 
Kljub temu je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je včasih podpora sklada EFSI zgolj nadomestila drugo financiranje EIB ali EU, da je bil del financiranja namenjen projektom, ki bi lahko pridobili druge vire javnih ali zasebnih finančnih sredstev, da so bile ocene dodatnih naložb, ki naj bi jih privabil sklad EFSI, včasih precenjene in da je bila večina naložb izvedenih v nekaj večjih državah članicah EU-15, ki imajo dobro razvite nacionalne spodbujevalne banke.
EN 2019 Special Report NO 04 The control system for organic products has improved, but some challenges remain (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
04 Posebno poročilo SL 2019 Nadzorni sistem za ekološke proizvode se je izboljšal, vendar nekateri izzivi še vedno obstajajo (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
Traceability has improved inside the EU, but not all producers could be traced Our traceability exercise reveals problems with labelling and certificates Conclusions and recommendations 84 - 88 89 90 - 98 Annex – Assessment of the level of implementation of the recommendations included in SR No 9/2012 Replies of the Commission 3 
Sledljivost se je znotraj EU izboljšala, vendar pa proizvodom ni bilo mogoče slediti do vseh proizvajalcev Pri pregledu sledljivosti, ki ga je opravilo Sodišče, so bile ugotovljene težave z označevanjem in potrdili Zaključki in priporočila Priloga – Ocena stopnje izvajanja priporočil iz Posebnega poročila št.
GLOSSARY Accreditation body: Public or private body that gives a formal recognition that a control body is competent to test and certify third parties according to organic standards. 
GLOSAR Akreditacijski organ: javni ali zasebni organ, ki uradno potrdi, da je izvajalec nadzora pristojen za preverjanje in potrjevanje tretjih oseb v skladu z ekološkimi standardi.
Equivalent control body: Control body operating in a third country that is recognised by the Commission as applying equivalent organic rules and control measures as those applied in the EU. 
Enakovreden izvajalec nadzora: izvajalec nadzora, ki deluje v tretji državi, ki jo Komisija potrdi kot državo, ki uporablja enakovredna pravila za ekološko pridelavo in nadzorne ukrepe, kot se uporabljajo v EU.
Equivalent third country: Third country that is recognised by the Commission as applying equivalent organic rules and control measures as those applied in the EU. 
Enakovredna tretja država: tretja države, ki jo Komisija potrdi kot državo, ki uporablja enakovredna pravila za ekološko pridelavo in nadzorne ukrepe, kot se uporabljajo v EU.
OFIS: Organic Farming Information System – the Commission’s IT system for the treatment of organic farming information. 
OFIS: informacijski sistem za ekološko kmetijstvo – informacijski sistem Komisije za obdelavo informacij o ekološkem kmetijstvu.
It allows (a) electronic data exchange between EU Member States, Norway, Iceland and the Commission; and (b) dissemination of public data to European citizens and operators. 
Sistem omogoča (a) elektronsko izmenjavo podatkov med državami članicami EU, Norveško, Islandijo in Komisijo ter (b) razširjanje javnih podatkov med državljani in izvajalci EU.
TRACES: TRAde Control and Expert System – the Commission’s online management tool for all sanitary requirements on intra-EU trade and importation of animals, semen and embryos, food. 
TRACES: celoviti računalniški veterinarski sistem (TRAde Control and Expert System) – spletno orodje Komisije za upravljanje vseh sanitarnih zahtev v zvezi s trgovino znotraj EU ter uvozom živali, semen in zarodkov ter hrane.
TRACES was established by Commission Decision 2004/292/EC pursuant to Council Directive 90/425/EEC. 4 
Uveden je bil z Odločbo Komisije 2004/292/ES v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 90/425/EGS. 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The main objectives of an EU-wide framework for organic production are to better protect consumer interests, to ensure fair competition between the producers and to facilitate the free circulation of organic products in the EU. 
POVZETEK I. Glavni cilji okvira za ekološko pridelavo na ravni EU so boljša zaščita interesov potrošnikov, zagotovitev pravične konkurence med pridelovalci in omogočanje prostega prometa ekoloških proizvodov v EU.
The control system for organic products is set out in the EU regulations. 
Nadzorni sistem za ekološke proizvode je določen v uredbah EU.
It aims to give consumers the confidence that when they buy organic products, EU – or equivalent – rules have been applied at every stage of the supply chain. 
Njegov namen je doseči zaupanje potrošnikov v to, da so se za ekološke proizvode, ki jih kupijo, v vseh fazah dobavne verige uporabljala pravila EU ali enakovredna pravila.
This should be the case whether the products are produced in the EU or imported. 
To bi moralo veljati ne glede na to, ali so proizvodi pridelani v EU ali uvoženi.
In June 2012, we published Special Report No 9/2012 on the control system governing the production, processing, distribution and import of organic products. 
Sodišče je junija 2012 objavilo Posebno poročilo št. 9/2012 o nadzornem sistemu za pridelavo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz ekoloških proizvodov.
To assess whether the Commission had remedied the weaknesses identified in our report, we have carried out a follow-up audit. 
Da bi Sodišče ocenilo, ali je Komisija odpravila slabosti, ugotovljene v poročilu, je opravilo revizijo za spremljanje izvajanja priporočil.
In addition, we have covered the import regimes for organic products more extensively. 
Poleg tega je natančneje pregledalo uvozne režime za ekološke proizvode.
We found that the control system had improved and that our recommendations had generally been implemented since our previous audit, but that some challenges remained. 
Ugotovilo je, da se je nadzorni sistem izboljšal in da so bila priporočila, ki jih je dalo, od prejšnje revizije na splošno izvedena, vendar nekateri izzivi še vedno obstajajo.
For organic products produced in the EU – the major part of EU consumption – both the Commission and the Member States have addressed many of the weaknesses identified in our previous report. 
Kar zadeva ekološke proizvode, pridelane v EU, ki pomenijo največji del porabe EU, so tako Komisija kot tudi države članice obravnavale več slabosti, ugotovljenih v prejšnjem poročilu Sodišča.
After our 2012 report, the Commission has resumed its audit visits to Member States, and has now visited most of them. 
Po njegovi objavi leta 2012 je Komisija nadaljevala svoje revizijske obiske v državah članicah in tako doslej obiskala večino od njih.
The competent authorities of the Member States that we audited have taken action to improve their control systems. 
Pristojni organi držav članic, ki jih je Sodišče revidiralo, so sprejeli ukrepe za izboljšanje svojih nadzornih sistemov.