natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
19 The aim of this audit was to examine the Commission’s tools for measuring farmers’ incomes and its use of income-related data for assessing the performance of CAP measures aimed at viable food production and supporting the income of farmers. 
19 Cilj te revizije je bil preučiti orodja, ki jih Komisija uporablja za merjenje dohodkov kmetov, in njeno uporabo podatkov v zvezi z dohodki za oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP, namenjenih trajnostni proizvodnji hrane in podpori dohodkov kmetov.
In this context the Court also reviewed the common performance indicators which the Commission recently defined for direct payments and other measures financed by the EAGF in relation to specific CAP objectives23. 
V tem okviru je Sodišče pregledalo tudi skupne kazalnike smotrnosti poslovanja, ki jih je Komisija pred kratkim opredelila za neposredna plačila in druge ukrepe, ki se financirajo iz EKJS v zvezi s posebnimi cilji SKP23.
It was not the purpose of this audit to evaluate the CMEF as such or to express an overall opinion on the functioning of the Member States’ statistical systems. 
Namen te revizije ni bil ovrednotiti skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja kot tak ali podati splošno mnenje o delovanju statističnih sistemov držav članic.
20 The overall audit question was: ‘Is the Commission’s system for measuring the performance of the CAP in relation to farmers’ incomes well designed and based on sound data?’ 
20 Splošno revizijsko vprašanje je bilo: „Ali je sistem Komisije za merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju SKP v zvezi z dohodki kmetov dobro zasnovan in ali temelji na zanesljivih podatkih?”
More specifically, the audit aimed to answer the following questions. ο Has the Commission clearly established what statistical data are needed for the effective performance assessment of CAP measures in support of farmers’ incomes? ο Did the Commission and Member States ensure that the data used for the measurement of farmers’ incomes are of appropriate quality? ο Did the Commission define relevant indicators allowing for the effective performance assessment of CAP measures in support of farmers’ incomes? 
Natančneje, namen revizije je bil odgovoriti na naslednja vprašanja: ο Ali je Komisija jasno določila, kateri statistični podatki so potrebni za uspešno oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v podporo dohodkov kmetov? ο Ali so Komisija in države članice zagotovile, da so podatki, ki se uporabljajo za merjenje dohodkov kmetov, ustrezne kakovosti? ο Ali je Komisija določila ustrezne kazalnike, ki omogočajo uspešno oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v podporo dohodkom kmetov?
23 For the performance measurement of the measures financed from the EAFRD see Special Report No 12/2013, ‘Can the Commission and Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent?’ (http://eca.europa.eu) 
23 Za merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov, financiranih iz EKSRP, glej Posebno poročilo št.
Audit scope and approach 17 21 The Court established its audit criteria on the basis of the provisions in the treaty24 and the regulations in force25. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 17 21 Sodišče je svoja revizijska merila določilo na podlagi določb iz Pogodbe24 in veljavnih predpisov25.
22 Audit visits were carried out at the Commission and in six Member States26. 
22 Revizijski obiski so bili opravljeni pri Komisiji in v šestih državah članicah26.
Together, these Member States account for more than 50 % of the gross value added of European agriculture and farmers in these Member States receive more than 50 % of the EU budget for agriculture, primarily in the form of direct payments. 
Te države članice skupaj pomenijo več kot 50 % bruto dodane vrednosti evropskega kmetijstva, kmetje v teh državah članicah pa prejemajo več kot 50 % sredstev proračuna EU za kmetijstvo, predvsem v obliki neposrednih plačil.
23 At the level of the Commission, the Court audited whether procedures ensured that the compilation of the EAAs and the management of the FADN were in line with the quality requirements of the framework for the development, production and dissemination of European statistics laid down in the Eurostat code of practice27. 
23 Na ravni Komisije je Sodišče revidiralo, ali so postopki zagotovili, da sta sestavljanje ERK in upravljanje FADN v skladu z zahtevami glede kakovosti iz okvira za razvoj, pripravo in izkazovanje evropske statistike Eurostata, določenega v kodeksu ravnanja Eurostata27.
In the Member States visited, the Court reviewed the procedures in place for data collection and quality assurance in respect of both the EAAs and the FADN. 
V obiskanih državah članicah je Sodišče pregledalo vzpostavljene postopke za zbiranje podatkov in zagotavljanje kakovosti v zvezi z ERK in FADN.
The purpose of the visits to Member States was also to identify good practice in terms of measurement of farmers’ incomes. 
Namen obiskov v državah članicah je bil tudi ugotoviti dobre prakse na področju merjenja dohodkov kmetov.
Audit evidence was collected and examined against the audit criteria by means of interviews and the analysis of documents and data. 
Revizijski dokazi so bili zbrani in preučeni na podlagi revizijskih meril s pogovori ter analizo dokumentov in podatkov.
In addition, the Court conducted a survey in all 28 Member States regarding the implementation of the EAAs and the FADN. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče v vseh 28 državah članicah izvedlo raziskovanje v zvezi z izvajanjem ERK in FADN.
24 The Court also carried out a desk review and analysis of the Commission’s performance management framework with regard to the objectives and performance indicators in relation to farmers’ incomes. 
24 Sodišče je opravilo tudi dokumentacijski pregled in analizo okvira Komisije za upravljanje smotrnosti poslovanja glede na cilje in kazalnike smotrnosti poslovanja v zvezi z dohodki kmetov.
In this analysis as well as in the audit of the FADN system the Court was assisted by two external experts. 
Pri tej analizi, pa tudi pri reviziji sistema FADN, so Sodišču pomagali zunanji strokovnjaki.
24 Article 39 TFEU. 
24 Člen 39 PDEU.
25 Regulation (EC) No 138/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 December 2003 on the economic accounts for agriculture in the Community (OJ L 33, 5.2.2004, p. 
138/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. decembra 2003 o ekonomskih računih za kmetijstvo v Skupnosti (UL L 33, 5.2.2004, str.
1) and Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 of 30 November 2009 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Community (OJ L 328, 15.12.2009, p. 
1217/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi mreže za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov o dohodkih in poslovanju kmetijskih gospodarstev v Evropski skupnosti (UL L 328, 15.12.2009, str.
27), Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics and repealing Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1101/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transmission of data subject to statistical confidentiality to the Statistical Office of the European Communities, Council Regulation (EC) No 322/97 on community statistics and Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom establishing a Committee on the Statistical Programmes of the European Communities (OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 164) and Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. 
1101/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenosu zaupnih podatkov na Statistični urad Evropskih skupnosti, Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 322/97 o statističnih podatkih Skupnosti in Sklepa Sveta 89/382/EGS, Euratom, o ustanovitvi Odbora za statistične programe Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 87, 31.3.2009, str. 164) in Uredba (EU) št.
26 Germany, Spain, France, the Netherlands, Poland and Romania. 
26 Nemčija, Španija, Francija, Nizozemska, Poljska in Romunija.
27 See Annex V. 
27 Glej Prilogo V.
Observations 18 The Commission has not yet established a comprehensive set of data for assessing the performance of CAP measures in relation to farmers’ incomes 25 To address the issue of whether the Commission has clearly established the statistical data needed, the Court considered whether information on all relevant aspects of farmers’ incomes is obtained, whether the EAAs capture sufficient macroeconomic data on farmers’ incomes and whether the FADN includes sufficient income data at the level of individual farmers. 
Opažanja 18 Komisija še ni določila celovitega sklopa podatkov za oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v zvezi z dohodki kmetov 25 Za obravnavo vprašanja, ali je Komisija jasno določila potrebne statistične podatke, je Sodišče ocenilo, ali so pridobljene informacije o vseh ustreznih vidikih dohodkov kmetov, ali ERK zajemajo zadostne makroekonomske podatke o dohodkih kmetov in ali FADN zajema dovolj podatkov o dohodkih na ravni posameznih kmetov.
The Commission still lacks information on farmers’ incomes at EU level There is no representative data on the disposable incomes of farm households 26 Disposable income of farm households includes receipts from sales of agricultural products, subsidies, other receipts (farm-related income)28 and other income29. 
Komisija še vedno nima informacij o dohodkih kmetov na ravni EU Ni reprezentativnih podatkov o razpoložljivih dohodkih gospodinjstev kmetij 26 Razpoložljivi dohodek gospodinjstev kmetij vključuje prejemke od prodaje kmetijskih proizvodov, subvencije, druge prejemke (dohodek, povezan s kmetijo)28, in druge dohodke29.
Disposable income is a key element for assessing the standard of living of farmers, one of the main objectives of the treaty. 
Razpoložljivi dohodek je eden ključnih elementov za oceno življenjske ravni kmetov, ki je eden glavnih ciljev Pogodbe.
27 A statistical framework to provide information on the disposable income of farmers and their households has not been developed at EU level. This is despite the fact that available information points to the growing significance of incomes that are not related to agricultural activity. 
27 Statistični okvir za zagotavljanje informacij o razpoložljivem dohodku kmetov in njihovih gospodinjstev na ravni EU še ni razvit, čeprav razpoložljive informacije kažejo, da so dohodki, ki niso povezani s kmetijsko dejavnostjo, vedno pomembnejši.
The Commission conducted two feasibility studies on the collection of such data30, the evaluation of which was part of the Commission’s statistical programme 2008-201231. 
Komisija je opravila dve študiji izvedljivosti o zbiranju tovrstnih podatkov30, katerih vrednotenje je bilo del statističnega programa Komisije za obdobje 2008–201231.
However, the Commission has so far neither carried out such evaluation, nor taken any other action to improve its knowledge of disposable farm household income. 
Vendar Komisija takega vrednotenja doslej ni izvedla niti sprejela drugih ukrepov za izboljšanje znanja o razpoložljivih dohodkih gospodinjstev kmetij.
28 Data on the disposable income and living conditions of households in general, including farm households, are available through the EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC)32. 
28 Podatki o razpoložljivem dohodku in življenjskih pogojih gospodinjstev na splošno, vključno z gospodinjstvi kmetij, so na voljo v okviru statistike EU o dohodku in življenjskih pogojih (EU-SILC)32.
The number of farm households included in this survey is, however, generally too small to draw valid conclusions on the incomes and living conditions of the farmers. 
Število gospodinjstev kmetij, vključenih v to raziskovanje, pa je na splošno premajhno za sprejetje veljavnih zaključkov o dohodkih in življenjskih pogojih kmetov.
28 Income from other gainful activities carried out using farm resources. 
28 Dohodek od drugih pridobitnih dejavnosti, ki se izvajajo z uporabo virov kmetije.
29 Income from outside sources, such as wages or salaries from other activities of the farmer or family members. 
29 Dohodek od zunanjih virov, kot so plače v zvezi z drugimi dejavnostmi kmeta ali družinskih članov.
30 Statistics Sweden, Feasibility study on collection of off-farm income data and data on other income, 2006; AgraCeas, Feasibility study on the implementation of income of agricultural households sector (IAHS) statistics, 2007. 
30 Statistics Sweden, Feasibility study on collection of off-farm income data and data on other income, 2006; AgraCeas, Feasibility study on the implementation of income of agricultural households sector (IAHS) statistics, 2007.
31 Decision No 1578/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 on the Community statistical programme 2008 to 2012 (OJ L 344, 28.12.2007, p. 
1578/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2007 o statističnem programu Skupnosti 2008–2012 (UL L 344, 28.12.2007, str.
32 Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) (OJ L 165, 3.7.2003, p. 1). 
1177/2003 z dne 16. junija 2003 o statistiki Skupnosti o dohodku in življenjskih pogojih (EU-SILC) (UL L 165, 3.7.2003, str. 1).
Observations 19 29 Furthermore, farm household income data are only specifically collected in 10 Member States. 
Opažanja 19 29 Poleg tega se podatki o dohodkih gospodinjstev kmetij posebej zbirajo samo v desetih državah članicah.
In addition, the approaches to collecting such information and the level of detail obtained vary significantly across these Member States (see Box 1). 
Tudi pristopi k zbiranju tovrstnih informacij in stopnja podrobnosti pridobljenih informacij se med temi državami članicami precej razlikujejo (glej okvir 1).
This variability of approaches limits the conclusions that can be drawn on the incomes and standard of living of farmers. 
Zaradi te raznolikosti pristopov je težje priti do zaključkov v zvezi z dohodki in življenjsko ravnjo kmetov.
Farm household income statistics prepared by individual Member States Data on the income of farm households are currently collected in Bulgaria, Denmark, Spain, France, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom (England). 
Statistični podatki o dohodku gospodinjstva kmetije, ki so jih pripravile posamezne države članice Podatki o dohodkih gospodinjstev kmetij se trenutno zbirajo v Bolgariji, na Danskem, v Španiji, Franciji, na Nizozemskem, v Avstriji, na Poljskem, Finskem, Švedskem in v Združenem kraljestvu (Anglija).
However, there is no common definition of ‘farm households’ and methodologies applied vary. 
Vendar pa ni skupne opredelitve pojma „gospodinjstvo kmetije”, pa tudi metodologije, ki se uporabljajo, se med seboj razlikujejo.
In the Netherlands, information on household income is available for more than half of the farms in the FADN sample (2013). 
Na Nizozemskem so informacije o dohodkih gospodinjstev za več kot polovico kmetij na voljo v vzorcu FADN (2013).
In France, the authorities use the FADN data together with information from tax registers to calculate the income of farm households. 
Francoski organi za izračun dohodka gospodinjstev kmetij uporabljajo podatke FADN skupaj z informacijami iz davčnih registrov.
In Poland, the EU-SILC survey is used and FADN respondents are asked to provide additional information about the income of their households on a voluntary basis. 
Na Poljskem se uporablja raziskovanje EU-SILC, anketiranci FADN pa so zaprošeni, da prostovoljno zagotovijo dodatne informacije o dohodku svojih gospodinjstev.
Bulgaria, Spain and Finland use only the EU-SILC survey, which contains a comparatively small number of farm households. 
Bolgarija, Španija in Finska uporabljajo le raziskovanje EU-SILC, ki zajema razmeroma malo gospodinjstev kmetij.
There is no adequate reference system for comparing farmers’ incomes to those in other sectors of the economy 30 It is important to compare farmers’ incomes to incomes in other sectors of the economy or with the income of specific socioeconomic groups that are comparable to farmers in order to determine to what extent they may be disadvantaged and why EU income support is needed or important for the viability of the holdings. 
Ni ustreznega referenčnega sistema za primerjavo dohodkov kmetov z dohodki v drugih gospodarskih sektorjih 30 Pomembno je primerjati dohodke kmetov z dohodki v drugih gospodarskih sektorjih ali z dohodki posebnih socialno-ekonomskih skupin, primerljivih s kmeti, da se določi, koliko so ti morda v manj ugodnem položaju in zakaj je dohodkovna podpora EU potrebna ali pomembna za sposobnost preživetja teh gospodarstev.
31 According to the Commission, available statistics indicate that farmers’ incomes are still significantly below the average income in the total economy33. 
31 Komisija meni, da razpoložljivi statistični podatki kažejo, da so dohodki kmetov še vedno bistveno nižji od povprečnih dohodkov v celotnem gospodarstvu33.
However, this conclusion is based on comparing incomes which are computed on different bases and are therefore difficult to compare34. 
Vendar ta ugotovitev temelji na primerjavi dohodkov, ki so izračunani na drugačnih osnovah in jih je zato težko primerjati34.
Such comparison requires careful interpretation to avoid the risk of inaccurate conclusions as to whether and, if so, the extent to which farmers’ incomes are lower than those in other sectors of the economy. 
Za takšno primerjavo je potrebna previdna razlaga, da se prepreči tveganje netočnih zaključkov o tem, ali so dohodki kmetov nižji od dohodkov v drugih gospodarskih sektorjih in, če so, za koliko.
33 SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 of 20 October 2011, ‘Commission impact assessment — Common agricultural policy towards 2020’, p. 
33 SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 z dne 20. oktobra 2011 o oceni učinka, ki jo je pripravila Komisija v zvezi s skupno kmetijsko politiko v obdobju do leta 2020, str.
According to the Commission, the level of income in the agricultural sector remains below 50 % of the average salary in the total economy. 
Komisija meni, da je raven dohodkov v kmetijskem sektorju še vedno pod 50 % povprečne plače v celotnem gospodarstvu.
34 In its annual activity reports the Commission compares the agricultural factor income per agricultural working unit with the EU gross domestic product per capita. 
34 Komisija v svojih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih primerja faktorski dohodek kmetijstva na kmetijsko delovno enoto z bruto domačim proizvodom v EU na prebivalca.
Another comparison used by the Commission is between agricultural entrepreneurial income per unpaid worker and gross wages and salaries per full-time equivalent in the rest of the economy. 
Komisija uporablja tudi primerjavo med podjetniškim dohodkom kmetijstva na neplačanega delavca ter bruto plačami na ekvivalent polnega delovnega časa v preostalih gospodarskih sektorjih.
Observations 20 32 Farm sizes and the income levels of the farming population vary significantly, as does the diversity of holdings. 
Opažanja 20 32 Velikosti kmetij in stopnje dohodkov kmetijskega prebivalstva se med seboj zelo razlikujejo, tako kot tudi raznovrstnost kmetijskih gospodarstev.
The averages used by the Commission to compare incomes per farm size, farm type and region in the FADN do not always demonstrate the extent to which certain groups of farmers are disadvantaged compared to others. 
Povprečne vrednosti, ki jih je Komisija uporabila za primerjavo dohodkov po velikosti in vrsti kmetije ter regiji v mreži FADN, ne odražajo vedno, v kolikšni meri so nekatere skupine kmetov v manj ugodnem položaju v primerjavi z drugimi.
As a result, these averages cannot be used to help determine whether the CAP measures to support farmers’ incomes help to reduce income disparities. 
Zato teh povprečnih vrednosti ni mogoče uporabljati za pomoč pri ugotovitvi, ali ukrepi SKP v podporo dohodkom kmetov pripomorejo k zmanjšanju razlik v dohodkih.
The EAAs are an important tool for monitoring the economic situation of agriculture but they have inherent limitations for assessing CAP measures The Commission has not further developed the EAAs in order to better use their potential 33 The Commission has to date not adapted the EAAs to the new standards for national accounts35 and has not used the full potential of the EAAs by developing them further to provide information on the role of imports, developments in demand for agricultural products (domestic or foreign), supply to the food industry, final consumption by households, special treatment of agriculture in the tax systems or use for non-food purposes such as production of bioenergy. 
Ekonomski računi za kmetijstvo so pomembno orodje za spremljanje gospodarskih razmer v kmetijstvu, vendar imajo omejitve za ocenjevanje ukrepov SKP Komisija ERK ni dodatno razvila, da bi bolje izkoristila njihov potencial 33 Komisija ERK še ni prilagodila novim standardom za nacionalne račune35 in ni izkoristila njihovega celotnega potenciala tako, da bi jih dodatno razvila, kar bi zagotovilo informacije o vlogi uvoza, spremembah v povpraševanju po kmetijskih proizvodih (domačih in tujih), dobavi živilski industriji, končni potrošnji gospodinjstev, posebni obravnavi kmetijstva v davčnih sistemih ali uporabi v neprehrambene namene, kot je proizvodnja bioenergije.
All these elements are, however, important factors that impact farmers’ incomes. 
Vsi ti elementi pa so pomembni dejavniki, ki vplivajo na dohodke kmetov.
34 The EAAs are not designed to help analyse the dependency of specific sectors on subsidies and their importance for viable farming in the regions, for specific types of production or for specific socioeconomic groups of farmers. 
34 ERK niso zasnovani tako, da bi pripomogli k analizi odvisnosti nekaterih sektorjev od subvencij in njihovega pomena za rentabilno kmetovanje v zadevnih regijah, za posebne vrste proizvodnje ali za posebne socialno-ekonomske skupine kmetov.
The role of subsidies is only shown as an aggregate which includes both EU and national support granted to farmers. 
Vloga subvencij je prikazana le v okviru zbirnih podatkov, ki vključujejo tako podporo EU kot tudi nacionalno podporo, dodeljeno kmetom.
This limits the EAAs’ usefulness in providing a basis for the analysis of the effectiveness and the efficiency of CAP measures in relation to farmers’ incomes. 
To omejuje uporabnost ERK pri zagotavljanju osnove za analizo uspešnosti in učinkovitosti ukrepov SKP v zvezi z dohodki kmetov.
35 Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union (ESA 2010) (OJ L 174, 26.6.2013, p. 1). 
549/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. maja 2013 o Evropskem sistemu nacionalnih in regionalnih računov v Evropski uniji (ESR 2010) (UL L 174, 26.6.2013, str. 1).
Observations 21 35 Information on land prices and rents is not only important for the calculation of farmers’ incomes but also for the assessment of the impact of CAP measures, because land is the main production factor for agriculture. 
Opažanja 21 35 Informacije o cenah zemljišč in najemninah niso pomembne le za izračun dohodkov kmetov, temveč tudi za oceno učinka ukrepov SKP, saj so zemljišča v kmetijstvu glavni proizvodni dejavnik.
Moreover, direct payments are mostly related to agricultural land, which can have an influence on land prices and thus on the efficiency and effectiveness of the support36. 
Poleg tega se neposredna plačila v glavnem nanašajo na kmetijska zemljišča, kar lahko vpliva na cene zemljišč ter posledično na učinkovitost in uspešnost podpore36.
To date, there is no legal basis in EU legislation that would ensure the regular collection of data on land prices and rents in all Member States and of comparable quality. 
Zaenkrat v zakonodaji EU še ne obstaja pravna podlaga, ki bi zagotovila redno zbiranje podatkov primerljive kakovosti o cenah zemljišč in najemnin v vseh državah članicah.
In spite of some efforts by Eurostat to gather suitable data, the available data are incomplete and do not follow a common methodology. 
Kljub nekaterim prizadevanjem Eurostata za zbiranje ustreznih podatkov so razpoložljivi podatki nepopolni in ne temeljijo na skupni metodologiji.