natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission notes that the payment-upon-delivery design feature was determined by the co-legislators in the text of the ETS Directive. 
Komisija opozarja, da sta značilnost zasnove, da se plača po izvedbi, določila sozakonodajalca v besedilu direktive o ETS.
However, Member States were able to provide upfront funding, support the construction phase and share the risks with the project developers. 
Kljub temu so lahko države članice zagotovile vnaprejšnje financiranje, s katerim so podprle fazo gradnje in delile tveganja z nosilci projektov.
Bankability assessment can only be relevant for projects that are economically viable, have clear and secured revenues, clear financing structure, and secured business case. 
Ocena dobičkonosnosti je lahko pomembna le za projekte, ki so ekonomsko upravičeni, ki imajo jasne in zagotovljene prihodke, jasno strukturo financiranja in zagotovljeno gospodarsko upravičenost.
These features are not the characteristics of first of a kind projects whose main purpose is to demonstrate technological viability. 
Te lastnosti niso značilne za projekte, ki so prvi svoje vrste in katerih glavni namen je dokazati tehnološko vzdržnost.
Therefore, the due diligence did not include the bankability assessment. 
Zato potrebna skrbnost ni zajela ocene dobičkonosnosti.
It can be assumed that few of the projects submitted or selected would have scored positively, as is a normal case for pre-commercial demonstration investments, at the early stage of project development/application. 
Domnevati je mogoče, da bi bilo le nekaj predloženih ali izbranih projektov ocenjenih pozitivno, kakor je običajno pri predkomercialnih predstavitvenih naložbah v zgodnji fazi izdelave/uporabe projekta.
Bankability becomes relevant at the stage of the financial close, after technological demonstration leads to full visibility of the business case. 
Dobičkonosnost postane pomembna v fazi zapiranja finančne konstrukcije, potem ko tehnološka predstavitev pripelje do popolne prepoznavnosti gospodarske upravičenosti.
The rule, set in the legal basis (NER 300 Decision) was to rank the projects based on Cost-per-unit performance (CPUP) – there was no other choice than to follow the adopted implementing act provisions. 
Po pravilu, določenem v pravni podlagi (sklepu o programu NER300), je bilo treba projekte razvrstiti na podlagi stroškov na enoto – ni bilo druge možnosti, kakor da se upoštevajo sprejete določbe izvedbenega akta.
This uncertainty in costs is a common feature for all projects at similar technological readiness levels (TRL) and project preparedness. 
Ta negotovost pri stroških je pogosta značilnost vseh projektov na podobni ravni tehnološke in projektne pripravljenosti.
The NER 300 decision and award decisions foresee adjusting of the relevant costs and maximum award when the final investment decision is taken and the uncertainty of costs diminishes. 
prilagoditev ustreznih stroškov in najvišjega zneska dodeljenih sredstev po tem, ko je sprejeta končna odločitev o naložbi in se negotovost stroškov zmanjša.
The Commission considered the information received from European Investment Bank (EIB). 
Komisija je obravnavala informacije, ki jih je prejela od Evropske investicijske banke (EIB).
Nevertheless, the final award decision followed direct confirmation of support from the Member States for all projects. 
Kljub temu je končna odločitev o dodelitvi sledila neposredni potrditvi držav članic, da bodo zagotovile podporo za vse projekte.
Box 9 The Member State confirmed the support to all selected projects. 
Okvir 9 Država članica je potrdila, da bo podprla vse izbrane projekte.
Other support mechanisms than Feed-in-tariffs were possible to be used. 4 
Namesto zagotovljenih odkupnih cen je bilo mogoče uporabiti druge podporne mehanizme.
The Commission notes that Member States were able to request the Due Diligence reports after the competitive process was concluded. 
Komisija opozarja, da so države članice po zaključku konkurenčnega postopka lahko zaprosile za poročila o skrbnem pregledu poslovanja.
The Commission did not have the mandate to provide the reports, unless Member States asked for them. 
Komisija ni imela pooblastila, da priskrbi poročila, če države članice niso zaprosile za njih.
The design of the selection and award process was set in the related Implementing act (NER 300 Decision), and was based on a single CPUP indicator. 
Zasnova postopka izbire projektov in dodelitve sredstev je bila določena v povezanem izvedbenem aktu (sklepu o programu NER300), temeljila pa je na enem kazalniku stroškov na enoto.
It was therefore not possible to set another methodology for selection and award of projects. 
Zato ni bilo mogoče določiti druge metodologije za izbiro projektov in dodelitev sredstev.
Eligibility criteria included the innovativeness indicator, which was a pre-requisite for entry into the competition for funding. 
Merila za upravičenost so zajemala kazalnik inovativnosti, ki je bil prvi pogoj za potegovanje za financiranje.
All NER 300 selected projects fulfilled provisions of innovativeness, as at the time of award, none of the technologies were commercially available. 
Vsi projekti, izbrani v okviru programa NER300, so izpolnjevali določbe o inovativnosti, saj ob dodelitvi nobena tehnologija ni bila na voljo za komercialno uporabo.
That fact that markets change, some technologies progress faster than others, and some can be slowed down by the economic or regulatory framework is a natural characteristics of market economy. 
Dejstvo, da se trgi spreminjajo, da nekatere tehnologije napredujejo hitreje kot druge in da lahko nekatere upočasni ekonomski ali regulativni okvir, je naravna značilnost tržnega gospodarstva.
Box 10 The first NER 300 call was launched in 2011. 
Okvir 10 Prvi razpis za zbiranje predlogov v okviru programa NER300 je bil objavljen leta 2011.
All selected projects were evaluated as innovative and represented projects not commercially tested or implemented at the time. 
Vsi izbrani projekti so bili ocenjeni kot inovativni, poleg tega pa je šlo za projekte, ki takrat še niso bili komercialno preizkušeni ali izvedeni.
This was an eligibility criterion checked by both the Member States and the Commission. 
To je bilo merilo za upravičenost, ki so ga preverile države članice in Komisija.
They contributed to the aim of the SET-Plan (Strategic Energy Technology Plan) programme in wind at the time, which was presented in the Wind European Industrial Initiative Team 2010-2012 Implementation Plan of May 2010. 
Prispevala sta k cilju takratnega vetrnega programa načrta SET (strateškega načrta za energetsko tehnologijo), ki je bil predstavljen v izvedbenem načrtu skupine za vetrno energijo v okviru evropske industrijske pobude za obdobje 2010–2012 iz maja 2010.
The objectives, criteria and monitoring requirements of selected Financial Instruments used to channel the NER 300 unspent funds from the first call, have been aligned with the NER 300 legal basis requirements, through amendments of specific Delegation Agreements with the EIB. 
Cilji, merila in zahteve glede spremljanja izbranih finančnih instrumentov, uporabljenih za usmerjanje neporabljenih sredstev v okviru programa NER300 iz prvega razpisa za zbiranje predlogov, so bili s spremembami posebnih sporazumov o prispevku z EIB usklajeni z zahtevami pravne podlage programa NER300.
Common eligibility check will be performed, ensuring the objectives of the NER 300 are attained. 
Opravljeno bo skupno preverjanje upravičenosti, kar bo zagotovilo doseganje ciljev programa NER300.
Although voluntary in character, the Integrated SET-plan remains one of the main 'soft' policy tools available to align and coordinate efforts (national and EU level) on clean energy technology innovation. 
Čeprav je celovit načrt SET prostovoljen, je še naprej eno glavnih „mehkih“ orodij politike, ki je na voljo za usklajevanje prizadevanj (na nacionalni ravni in ravni EU) glede inovacij na področju tehnologij za čisto energijo.
The platforms for interaction with stakeholders have evolved over the years. 
Platforme za stik z zainteresiranimi stranmi so se z leti razvile.
The establishment of implementing structures that will take forward the delivery of the activities under each Implementation Plan will strive to be as inclusive as possible. 
Ustanavljanje izvedbenih struktur, ki bodo nadaljevale dejavnosti po posameznem izvedbenem načrtu, naj bi bilo kar najbolj vključujoče.
The Commission considers that joint programming already exists in several areas. 
Komisija meni, da na več področjih skupno načrtovanje programov že obstaja.
ERA-Net (European Research Area) actions are an important joint funding instrument used for the coordination of the SET-Plan. 
Ukrepi programa ERA-Net (evropskega raziskovalnega prostora) so pomemben instrument skupnega financiranja, ki se uporablja za usklajevanja načrta SET.
By June 2018, the process of finalisation and endorsement of the Implementation Plans has progressed and 11 of the 14 plans have been endorsed. 
Postopek dokončanja in potrditve izvedbenih načrtov je do junija 2018 napredoval in potrjenih je bilo 11 od 14 načrtov.
A new SET-Plan agenda 2018-2023 has been endorsed including the guidelines for reporting on progress and achievements. 
Potrjen je bil nov program načrta SET za obdobje 2018–2023, vključno s smernicami glede poročanja o napredku in dosežkih.
Reporting to the SET-Plan steering group meetings on the achievements of each Implementation Plan will come from the relevant implementing bodies to be set up. 
Poročanje na sejah usmerjevalne skupine načrta SET o dosežkih posameznega izvedbenega načrta bodo opravili ustrezni izvajalski organi, ki bodo ustanovljeni.
The new SET-Plan agenda 2018-2023 has identified the need for strengthening the engagement of national funding bodies in the SET-Plan implementation. 
Novi program načrta SET za obdobje 2018–2023 je opredelil potrebo po krepitvi vključevanja nacionalnih organov financiranja v izvajanje načrta SET.
The Commission wants to stress that SET-Plan Roadmaps, product of the SET-Plan temporary working groups, are part of the evidence base for the development of the Innovation Fund. 
Komisija poudarja, da so časovni načrti iz načrta SET, ki so jih oblikovale začasne delovne skupine za načrt SET, del dokazne podlage za oblikovanje sklada za inovacije.
The Commission has organised comprehensive workshops with all sectors eligible under the Innovation Fund, followed by the open public consultation, where Commission services cooperated on including the SET-Plan community. As well, the Commission established an expert group 5 
Komisija je organizirala celovite delavnice za vse sektorje, upravičene do sredstev iz sklada za inovacije, ki jim je sledilo odprto javno posvetovanje, v okviru katerega so njene službe sodelovale pri vključevanju skupnosti, ki oblikuje načrt SET.
composed of the representatives of industry and Member States, which will assist with the development of the Innovation Fund Delegated Act. 
Poleg tega je ustanovila skupino strokovnjakov, sestavljeno iz predstavnikov industrije in držav članic, ki bodo pomagali pri pripravi delegiranega akta o skladu za inovacije.
The SET-Plan Steering Group has adopted a new SET-Plan Agenda 2018-2023 identifying the activities over the next 5 years to optimise its impact and delivery. 
Usmerjevalna skupina načrta SET je sprejela nov program načrta SET za obdobje 2018–2023, v katerem so za naslednjih 5 let opredeljene dejavnosti, ki bodo optimizirale učinke in rezultate načrta SET.
Special emphasis has been set on the operational framework for the execution of the 14 Implementation Plans. 
Poseben poudarek je na operativnem okviru za izvedbo 14 izvedbenih načrtov.
To assess progress towards the objectives of the 2015 Commission Communication 'Towards an Integrated Strategic Energy Technology Plan' and the realization of the agenda 2018-2023, an independent assessment will be performed in 2020. 
Napredek pri doseganju ciljev iz sporočila Komisije iz leta 2015 „Na poti k celostnemu strateškemu načrtu za energetsko tehnologijo“ in uresničevanju programa za obdobje 2018–2023 bo ocenjen z neodvisno oceno, ki bo opravljena leta 2020.
Additionally, Member States will also report from 2020 on, as part of their new Integrated Energy and Climate Plans. 
Poleg tega bodo države članice od leta 2020 poročale v okviru novih celovitih energetskih in podnebnih načrtov.
The execution of the SET-Plan Implementation Plans will be also monitored using Strategic Energy Technologies Information system (SETIS). 
Izvajanje izvedbenih načrtov načrta SET se bo spremljalo tudi z uporabo informacijskega sistema za strateško energetsko tehnologijo (SETIS).
SETIS provides information on the significant results achieved over the years, since 2007, and offers a useful insight into its benefits. 
Ta zagotavlja informacije o pomembnih rezultatih, doseženih od leta 2007, ter daje koristen vpogled v njegove prednosti.
Finally, the InnovFin Energy Demo Projects (InnovFin EDP), developed under Horizon 2020 to address the needs of the SET-Plan stakeholders, is a measurable result. 
Nazadnje, instrument InnovFin Energy Demo Projects (InnovFin EDP), ki je bil oblikovan v okviru Obzorja 2020 za obravnavo potreb zainteresiranih strani, povezanih z načrtom SET, je merljiv rezultat.
The Commission would like to point out the fact that there are a number of NER 300 projects being actively screened or developed under the InnovFin EDP pipeline. 
Komisija želi poudariti dejstvo, da se številni projekti iz programaNER300 aktivno pregledujejo ali oblikujejo v okviru priprave projektov znotraj instrumenta InnovFin Energy Demo Projects.
Some projects are progressing with receiving additional support from the InnovFin EDP.Projects can be supported through financial instruments when they reach certain maturity and bankability. 
Nekateri projekti napredujejo z dodatno podporo instrumenta InnovFin Energy Demo Projects. Projekti se lahko podprejo s finančnimi instrumenti, ko dosežejo neko zrelost in dobičkonosnost.
To get there, projects must secure revenues to be able to service their debt or ensure equity returns. 
Da do tega pride, morajo projekti zagotoviti prihodke, ki lahko poplačajo njihove dolgove ali zagotovijo donose iz lastniških instrumentov.
This takes time, as first the technological viability must be demonstrated. 
Za to je potreben čas, saj je treba najprej dokazati tehnološko vzdržnost.
The Commission notes that Horizon 2020 and Innovation Fund have different objectives set up by their legal basis, which cannot be served with one single joined programme. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da imata Obzorje 2020 in sklad za inovacije različne cilje, ki jih določata njuni pravni podlagi in ki jih ni mogoče doseči z enim skupnim programom.
Therefore, they will remain complementary although it may require enhancing the possible synergies. 
Zato se bosta še naprej dopolnjevala, čeprav bi bilo morda za to treba okrepiti možne sinergije.
The Commission has recently adopted a proposal for the Invest EU Programme, which will streamline and consolidate the EU Financial Instruments. 
Komisija je pred kratkim sprejela predlog programa InvestEU, ki bo racionaliziral in utrdil finančne instrumente EU.
Article 6 of InvestEU Regulation proposal includes provisions for blending grants with financial instruments, as a key measure enabling effective offer of specific products fit for various sectors and risk profiles. 
Člen 6 predloga uredbe o programu InvestEU vključuje določbe za kombiniranje nepovratnih sredstev s finančnimi instrumenti kot ključni ukrep, ki omogoča uspešno ponudbo posebnih produktov, primernih za različne sektorje in profile tveganja.
Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Debt Instruments also includes a blending call. 
Dolžniški instrument v okviru instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope vključuje tudi razpis za kombinirano financiranje.
The Commission notes that the Delegation Agreement with the EIB provides for rigorous monitoring and reporting obligations to ensure sound financial management. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da sporazum o prispevku zEIB določa stroge obveznosti glede spremljanja in poročanja, da se zagotovi dobro finančno upravljanje.
The Commission will address the financial control issues in the relevant Delegation Agreements with the EIB, and in the Innovation Fund delegated act. 
Komisija bo vprašanja glede finančnega nadzora uredila v ustreznih sporazumih o prenosu pooblastil z EIB in delegiranem aktu o skladu za inovacije.
NER 300 revenues and assets under EIB management are not part of the EU budget and are not under the Commission control. 
Prihodki v okviru programa NER300 in sredstva, ki jih upravlja EIB, niso del proračuna EU in niso pod nadzorom Komisije.
Projects are selected and contracted by the Member States, remaining revenues accrue to them. 
Projekte izberejo države članice, ki zanje tudi sklenejo pogodbe, poleg tega pa jim pripadejo preostali prihodki.
Therefore they cannot be integrated with the EU Budget and reported on the EU balance sheet under the applicable EU accounting rule 2 (‘Consolidation and Accounting for Joint Arrangements and Associates’). 
Zato jih ni mogoče vključiti v proračun EU in izkazati v bilanci stanjaEU po veljavnem računovodskem pravilu2EU („Konsolidacija in obračunavanje skupnih ureditev in pridruženih podjetij“).
The Commission reports annually on the NER 300 implementation in its Management Plan and Annual Activity Reports. 
Komisija letno poroča o izvajanju programa NER300 v svojih poročilih o načrtih upravljanja in o letnih dejavnostih.
Please see Commission reply to paragraph 104. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 104.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 109.
109. The Commission stresses the particularly adverse conditions that prevailed from 2012 onwards. 
Komisija poudarja zlasti škodljive razmere, ki so prevladovale od leta 2012.
Although the Commission deployed significant efforts in respect of these six projects, it could not go against the industrial trend or the more general market demand and neither could it go against changing political priorities of Member State governments. 
Čeprav je v teh šest projektov vložila veliko truda, ni mogla kljubovati industrijskemu trendu ali bolj splošnemu tržnemu povpraševanju niti spreminjajočim se političnim prednostnim nalogam vlad držav članic.
The Commission wants to stress that withdrawal of innovative projects is a normal market feature. 
Komisija poudarja, da je umik inovativnih projektov normalna tržna značilnost.
50% withdrawal rate is a normal situation, and is also globally exhibited in other programmes supporting innovation. 
Petdesetodstotna stopnja umika je običajna, kaže pa se tudi globalno pri drugih programih, ki podpirajo inovacije.
It is clear that projects that withdraw cannot deliver, as they prove not feasible in the marketplace. 
Jasno je, da umaknjeni projekti ne bi mogli biti uspešni, saj so se na trgu izkazali za neizvedljive.
The fact that these projects did not draw the NER 300 resources provides for prudent assurance that resources were not wasted, and allows for supporting new projects (under InnovFin Energy Demonstration Projects or Connecting Europe Facility Debt Instrument). 
Dejstvo, da ti projekti niso črpali sredstev iz programa NER300, prinaša preudarno zagotovilo, da sredstva niso bila zapravljena, in omogoča podporo novih projektov (v okviru instrumenta InnovFin Energy Demonstration Projects ali dolžniškega instrumenta v okviru instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope).
Any unused resources from the second call will be channelled to the Innovation Fund, hence supporting new projects. 
Vsa neporabljena sredstva iz drugega razpisa za zbiranje predlogov bodo usmerjena v sklad za inovacije, s čimer se bodo podprli novi projekti.
The Commissions however acknowledges that "frozen resources" are not an effective outcome of the programme. 
Komisija kljub temu priznava, da „zamrznjena sredstva“ niso uspešen izid programa.
The Commission would like to highlight the globally adverse effect of low oil prices to bioenergy projects. 
Komisija poudarja globalno škodljiv vpliv nizkih cen nafte na projekte s področja bioenergije.
According to investors, innovative bioenergy market collapsed after oil price crash and abundant oil reserves were supplied to the market. 
Po informacijah vlagateljev se je trg inovativne bioenergije po padcu cen nafte in dobavi velikih rezerv nafte na trg zrušil.
The decision to support innovation is a political risk assumed by the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament. 
Odločitev, da se podprejo inovacije, je politično tveganje, ki ga prevzemajo Komisija, Svet in Evropski parlament.
The Commission was encouraged to support this innovation by the Member States and stakeholders as well as by the consideration of the great potential of the CCS in contributing to the Union’s Energy and Climate targets. 
Komisijo so k podpiranju teh inovacij spodbudile države članice in zainteresirane strani, pa tudi upoštevanje velikega potenciala zajemanja in shranjevanja ogljikovega dioksida pri prispevanju k energetskim in podnebnim ciljem Unije.
The Member States involved remained supportive to the projects and the Commission considers that there was a reliable plan for their implementation. 
Vključene države članice so projekta še naprej podpirale in po mnenju Komisije je bil izdelan zanesljiv načrt za njuno izvedbo.
Therefore, at the time it was still expected that the projects would be realised. 
V danem trenutku se je zato še vedno pričakovalo, da bosta projekta uresničena.
The significant knowledge acquired in this process continues to be used at EU level, especially in the context of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan as well as in the European CCS Demonstration Project Network which is a platform to share the knowledge gained in such projects. 
Pomembno znanje, pridobljeno v tem procesu, se še naprej uporablja na ravni EU, zlasti v smislu strateškega načrta za energetsko tehnologijo in v evropskem omrežju predstavitvenih projektov zajemanja in shranjevanja ogljikovega dioksida, ki je platforma za izmenjavo znanja, pridobljenega v takih projektih.
The Commission will have a role in scrutinising the Member State plans and reporting to establish whether they contain all required elements. 
Komisija bo sodelovala pri pregledovanju načrtov in poročanja držav članic, da bi ugotovila, ali vsebujejo vse potrebne elemente.
It should consider the national integrated energy and climate plans when it awards EU funding. 
Pri dodeljevanju sredstev EU bi morala upoštevati nacionalne celovite energetske in podnebne načrte.
However, for centrally managed EU programmes, where the primary beneficiary of the Funds is not the Member State itself, the completeness of the Member States’ integrated energy and climate plans should not be used as a criterion to assess the merit of or make a final funding decision on a project. 
Kljub temu pri centralno upravljanih programihEU, pri katerih država članica ni glavna upravičenka do sredstev, popolnost celovitih energetskih in podnebnih načrtov držav članic ne bi 7 smela biti uporabljena kot merilo za oceno upravičenosti projekta ali končno odločitev o njegovem financiranju.
This could otherwise have the adverse effect of compromising projects that could have been beneficial for energy and climate policies. 
V nasprotnem primeru bi to imelo škodljiv vpliv, saj bi ogrozilo projekte, ki bi lahko bili koristni za energetske in podnebne politike.
In centrally managed programmes it will be up to the Commission to ensure that projects are aligned with the EU’s energy and climate policy objectives. 
Pri centralno upravljanih programih bo morala Komisija zagotoviti, da so projekti skladni s cilji energetskih in podnebnih politik EU.
Recommendation 1 – Increasing the potential for effective EU support to low carbon energy innovations The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo1 – Povečanje možnosti za učinkovito podporo EU za inovacije na področju nizkoogljične energije Komisija sprejema priporočilo.
Under the Innovation Fund, clear commitment from Member States, where relevant, will be sought. 
V okviru sklada za inovacije bo, kadar je to primerno, od držav članic zahtevana jasna zaveza.