natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is important to recognise, however, that charitable organisations, by their very nature, may not be able or willing to adopt restrictive distribution policies. 
Vendar je pomembno priznati, da dobrodelne organizacije že zaradi svoje narave morda ne morejo ali niso pripravljene uvesti restriktivne politike razdeljevanja.
UNCLEAR ELIGIBILITY AND SELECTION CRITERIA 38. 
NEJASNA MERILA ZA UPRAVIČENOST IN IZBOR 38.
In order to maximise the impact of the aid it is necessary to define workable priorities, both in view of selecting the charitable organisations which will channel the aid, and regarding categories and/or groups of the population who will receive the food aid. 
Za čim večji učinek pomoči je treba opredeliti izvedljive prednostne naloge tako glede izbire dobrodelnih organizacij, prek katerih se bo usmerjala pomoč, kot glede kategorij in/ali skupin prebivalstva, ki bodo prejemale pomoč v hrani.
The auditors found that in practice Member States have often without formalised procedures designated a small number of organisations operating nationwide, in which lower level organisations participate. 
Revizorji so ugotovili, da so v praksi države članice pogosto brez formaliziranih postopkov imenovale majhno število organizacij, ki delujejo na državni ravni in s katerimi sodelujejo organizacije na nižji ravni.
Precise data on the number of the designated charitable organisations with which the authorities of the Member States cooperate for the implementation of the annual plans are not available. 
Natančni podatki o številu imenovanih dobrodelnih organizacij, s katerimi sodelujejo organi držav članic pri izvajanju letnih načrtov, niso na voljo.
The charitable organisations at regional level automatically participate in the EU programme as being members of the main charitable organisations. 
Dobrodelne organizacije na regionalni ravni samodejno sodelujejo v programu EU kot članice glavnih dobrodelnih organizacij.
They have certain independence in establishing the criteria they apply for accepting lower level organisations for the distribution of food aid. 
Imajo določeno stopnjo samostojnosti pri določanju meril, ki jih uporabljajo za sprejemanje organizacij na nižji ravni za razdeljevanje pomoči v hrani.
20 Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, recital 18. 
20 Uredba (ES) št. 1234/2007, uvodna izjava (18).
21 Points 4 and 6.5 of Commission staff working document SEC(2008) 2436/2 accompanying the Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy and Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) as regards food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (COM(2008) 563 final). 
21 Točki 4 in 6.5 delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije SEC(2008) 2436/2, ki je priložen Predlogu za uredbo Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike in Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode („Uredba o enotni SUT“) v zvezi z razdeljevanjem hrane najbolj ogroženim osebam v Skupnosti (COM(2008) 563 konč.).
Furthermore, according to the legal provisions, the beneficiaries’ eligibility criteria should be based on ‘recorded or recognised social and financial dependence’. 
Poleg tega morajo v skladu s pravnimi določbami merila za upravičenost upravičencev temeljiti na „ugotovljeni ali priznani socialni in finančni odvisnosti“.
Accordingly, national authorities should adopt such criteria or to approve criteria used by charitable organisations. 
V skladu s tem morajo nacionalni organi pripraviti merila za to ali pa odobriti merila, ki jih uporabljajo dobrodelne organizacije.
Member States are also required to notify the Commission annually of the eligibility criteria to be met by recipients. 
Države članice morajo poleg tega Komisijo letno obveščati o merilih za upravičenost, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati prejemniki.
The Court found that no such precise eligibility criteria were fixed by the Member States. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da države članice niso določile nobenih natančnih meril za upravičenost.
The criteria communicated annually to the Commission22 are rather a typology of the persons assisted rather than quantitative or qualitative selection criteria (see Box 9). 
Merila, ki se letno sporočajo Komisiji22, so bolj tipologija oseb, ki se jim zagotavlja pomoč, ne pa kvantitativna ali kvalitativna merila za izbor (glej okvir 9).
Finally the Court found that there were significant differences in the frequency of reception of the aid (some persons having occasional meals provided compared to people in social institutes or to families receiving food aid or parcels on a regular basis). 
Kot zadnje je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so bile precejšnje razlike v pogostosti prejemanja pomoči (nekatere osebe dobijo obrok samo občasno, medtem ko osebe v socialnih ustanovah ali družine redno prejemajo pomoč v hrani ali pakete).
22 Pursuant to Article 1(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92. 
22 V skladu s členom 1(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3149/92.
BOX 9 20 EXAMPLES OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA USED BY CHARITABLE ORGANISATIONS • Economic criteria: homelessness, poverty, unemployment ... • Social criteria: immigrants, elderly people, large families ... • Health criteria: illnesses, handicapped. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
OKVIR 9 20 PRIMERI MERIL ZA UPRAVIČENOST, KI JIH UPORABLJAJO DOBRODELNE ORGANIZACIJE: • Ekonomska merila: brezdomstvo, revščina, brezposelnost itd. • Socialna merila: priseljenci, starejši, velike družine itd. • Zdravstvena merila: bolezni, invalidnost. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
THE VARIETY OF FOOD MADE AVAILABLE IS CONSTRAINED BY THE INTERVENTION STORAGE LINK, AND DISTRIBUTION VARIES WIDELY 42. The distribution of the foodstuffs by the charitable organisations to deprived persons may take different forms depending on the specific activities of the charitable organisation (meals offered in public canteens, meals offered in nurseries and hospices, packages of food delivered to individuals and families, etc.). 
RAZNOVRSTNOST HRANE, DANE NA VOLJO, JE OMEJENA ZARADI POVEZAVE Z INTERVENCIJSKIM SKLADIŠČENJEM, NAČINI RAZDELJEVANJA PA SE ZELO RAZLIKUJEJO 42. Dobrodelne organizacije lahko razdeljujejo živila ogroženim osebam na različne načine, odvisno od njihovih posebnih dejavnosti (obroki v javnih kuhinjah, obroki v jaslih in hospicih, paketi hrane, ki se dosta-vljajo posameznikom in družinam itd.).
The origin of the measure and its link with the distribution of foodstuff historically available from Community stocks also led to rules governing the programme which impose constraints on the variety of final products that may be acquired and distributed to the deprived persons. 
Zaradi ozadja ukrepa in njegove povezanosti z razdeljevanjem živil, ki so tradicionalno na voljo v zalogah Skupnosti, nekatera pravila, ki urejajo program, omejujejo raznovrstnost končnih proizvodov, ki jih je mogoče kupiti in razdeliti ogroženim osebam.
The legal provisions23 stipulate that the supply of products mobilised on the Community market must belong to the same product group as the product temporarily unavailable in the intervention stocks. 
V skladu s pravnimi določbami23 morajo proizvodi, ki se kupijo na trgu Skupnosti, spadati v isto skupino proizvodov kot proizvod, ki začasno ni na voljo v intervencijskih zalogah.
Up to September 2007 products from intervention stocks had to represent at least 40 % of the net weight of the food product to be supplied. 
Do septembra 2007 so morali proizvodi iz intervencijskih zalog predstavljati vsaj 40 % neto teže dobavljenega prehrambnega proizvoda.
Given the fact that in the course of the years some products have no longer been taken into intervention (e.g. beef, olive oil), the choice of products available for distribution to deprived persons has become limited. 
Ker se nekateri proizvodi z leti niso več jemali v intervencijo (npr. govedina, oljčno olje), je postala izbira proizvodov, ki so na voljo za razdelitev ogroženim osebam, omejena.
The Court found that several charitable organisations participating in the implementation of the programme considered it a priority to enlarge the variety of the products offered to allow the preparation of balanced meals24. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je več dobrodelnih organizacij, ki sodelujejo pri izvajanju programa, povečanje raznovrstnosti ponujenih proizvodov, ki omogoča pripravo uravnoteženih obrokov, štelo za prednostno nalogo24.
23 Article 4(1)(b) and 4(2a) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92. 
23 Člena 4(1)(b) in 4(2a) Uredbe (EGS) št.
24 In particular they expressed the need for food products such as oil, tomato pasta, meat, frozen vegetables. 21 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
24 Predvsem so izrazile potrebo po živilih, kot so olje, paradižnikova mezga, meso in zamrznjena zelenjava. 21 Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
The auditors also found that a wide variety of systems and methodologies are used to distribute foodstuffs from the managing authorities to designated organisations, from there to lower level charitable organisations and finally to deprived persons (see Box 10). 
Revizorji so prav tako odkrili, da se za razdeljevanje živil od organov upravljanja do imenovanih organizacij, od njih do dobrodelnih organizacij na nižjih ravneh in nazadnje do ogroženih oseb uporabljajo zelo raznoliki sistemi in metodologije (glej okvir 10).
22 BOX 10 DISTRIBUTION MODALITIES In Member States where more than one designated organisations are operating, the allocation of the foodstuffs among them is based on predetermined standard percentages applied and un-revised for many years (France, Poland). 
22 OKVIR 10 NAČINI RAZDELJEVANJA V državah članicah, v katerih deluje več imenovanih organizacij, dodeljevanje živil med te organizacije temelji na vnaprej določenih standardnih deležih, ki se nespremenjeni uporabljajo že vrsto let (v Franciji, na Poljskem).
In Italy designated organisations are not involved and the distribution of the final products is made directly to regional level organisations on the basis on specified parameters (number of interventions and applications). 
V Italiji imenovane organizacije ne sodelujejo in končni proizvodi se razdelijo neposredno organizacijam na regionalni ravni na podlagi posebej opredeljenih parametrov (števila intervencij in vlog).
For the distribution of the food from the designated national organisations to the lower level organisations again a multiplicity of systems and in some cases factors are used. 
Za razdeljevanje hrane od imenovanih nacionalnih organizacij do organizacij na nižji ravni se spet uporabljajo različni sistemi in v nekaterih primerih koeficienti.
In Spain the distribution is based on certain coefficients set by the designated organisation. 
V Španiji razdeljevanje poteka na podlagi določenih koeficientov, ki jih določi imenovana organizacija.
In Poland the organisations visited apply their own systems. 
Obiskane organizacije na Poljskem uporabljajo svoje sisteme.
For example one organisation has set a quantitative target, which is 35 kg of food per person per year. 
Neka organizacija je opredelila kvantitativni cilj, ki letno znaša 35 kg hrane na osebo, na primer.
In France each designated organisation applies its own system. 
V Franciji vsaka imenovana organizacija uporablja svoj sistem.
For example one organisation allocates the resources to 79 second level organisations on the basis of a factor called ‘coefficients K’ which is determined ‘according to certain criteria: population of the department, number of jobseekers, number of long-term jobseekers, number of recipients of minimum welfare income for the unemployed’. 
Neka organizacija na primer dodeljuje vire 79 organizacijam na drugi ravni na podlagi dejavnika, imenovanega „koeficienti K“, ki je opredeljen „glede na določena merila: število prebivalstva na upravnem območju, število iskal-cev zaposlitve, število dolgotrajno brezposelnih, število oseb, ki prejemajo minimalno socialno pomoč za brezposelne“.
Another organisation distributes the food to 98 federations proportionally to the number of beneficiaries declared. 
Neka druga organizacija pa razdeljuje hrano 98 federacijam sorazmerno s številom prijavljenih upravičencev.
The distribution of the foodstuffs to the final recipients by the charitable organisations and the frequency of deliveries are based on their own criteria and logistical capacities. 
Razdeljevanje živil končnim prejemnikom, ki ga opravljajo dobrodelne organizacije, in pogostost dobav temeljita na njihovih lastnih merilih in logističnih zmogljivostih.
In some cases charitable organisations suggest certain criteria. For example in Poland one organisation has proposed some standards for each delivery to an individual, e.g. milk at least 15 l per person and delivery, flour at least 5 kg per person and delivery. 
V nekaterih primerih dobrodelne organizacije predlagajo posamezna merila; neka organizacija na Poljskem, na primer, je predlagala nekaj standardov za vsako dostavo posameznikom, npr. za mleko vsaj 15 l na osebo in na dostavo, za moko vsaj 5 kg na osebo in na dostavo.
In most of the cases the charitable organisations distribute whatever they have received on the basis of their own criteria and in some cases on the principle of equal treatment of the persons in need, i.e. the quantity of the available products is distributed in equal parts to each person adhered to the organisation or requesting the aid. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Dobrodelne organizacije večinoma vse, kar so prejele, razdelijo na podlagi lastnih meril in v nekaterih primerih na podlagi načela enakega obravnavanja pomoči potrebnih oseb, tj. količina razpoložljivih proizvodov je razdeljena na enake dele za vse osebe, ki pripadajo organizaciji ali prosijo za pomoč. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
Specifically, in the entire distribution chain there are no common standards, guidelines or indications at Community or national level concerning the quantity and the variety of products to be distributed per person. 
Natančneje povedano, v celotni distribucijski verigi ni skupnih standardov, smernic ali indikacij na ravni Skupnosti ali nacionalni ravni o količini in raznovrstnosti razdeljenih proizvodov na osebo.
The Court found that the quantities distributed per person in each Member State and among the charitable organisations of the same Member State, differ considerably. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se razdeljene količine na osebo tako med državami članicami kot med dobrodelnimi organizacijami iste države članice zelo razlikujejo.
Such a diverse approach increases the risk of negligible impact and leads to unequal treatment between final recipients of the aid (see Box 11). 
Tako raznolik pristop povečuje nevarnost, da bo učinek zanemarljiv, in vodi k neenakopravni obravnavi končnih prejemnikov pomoči (glej okvir 11).
Annex III shows the products and quantities allocated by Member State and per final recipient for the annual plan 2005, for which data on final recipients are available. 
V Prilogi III so predstavljeni razdeljeni proizvodi in količine po posameznih državah članicah in po končnih prejemnikih za letni načrt za leto 2005, za katerega so na voljo podatki o končnih prejemnikih.
23 BOX 11 Organisation 2006 2007 A 1,71 kg/person 9,68 kg/person B 2,29 kg/person 14,44 kg/person EXAMPLES OF QUANTITIES OF PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTED PER PERSON Spain: Distribution statistics for the 2007 plan show that on average 49,88 kg of products per registered recipient were distributed; with a minimum of 28,24 kg/person in one food bank and a maximum of 89,16 kg/person in another. 
23 OKVIR 11 Organizacija 2006 2007 A 1,71 kg/osebo 9,68 kg/osebo B 2,29 kg/osebo 14,44 kg/osebo PRIMERI KOLIČIN RAZDELJENIH PROIZVODOV PO OSEBI: Španija: Statistični podatki o razdeljevanju v zvezi z načrtom za leto 2007 kažejo, da je bilo v povprečju razdeljenih 49,88 kg proizvodov na prijavljenega prejemnika, z najmanj 28,24 kg na osebo v eni banki hrane in največ 89,16 kg na osebo v drugi.
Italy: Two organisations active in the same area distributed the following quantities of pasta to their beneficiaries: Poland: The annual average distribution per person (2006) was: 24,95 kg by one designated organisation; 12,59 kg by another organisation. 
Italija: Dve organizaciji, ki delujeta na istem območju, sta svojim upravičencem razdelili naslednje količine testenin: Poljska: Povprečna letna razdelitev na osebo (2006) je znašala: pri eni imenovani organizaciji 24,95 kg; pri drugi imenovani organizaciji 12,59 kg.
A third organisation distributed 6,72 kg per person in the region of Dolnoslaskie, while in the region of Lodzkie it distributed 78,03 kg per person. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Tretja organizacija je razdelila 6,72 kg na osebo v regiji Dolnoslaskie in 78,03 kg na osebo v regiji Lodzkie. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
THE PROGRAMME’S ACTUAL IMPLEMENTATION: ARE THE PROCEDURES BEING APPLIED AS INTENDED? SHORTCOMINGS IN ADMINISTRATIVE AND ACCOUNTABILITY PROCEDURES NO OPERATIONAL SUB-OBJECTIVES 48. 
DEJANSKO IZVAJANJE PROGRAMA: SE POSTOPKI IZVAJAJO, KAKOR JE BILO PREDVIDENO? POMANJKLJIVOSTI V UPRAVNIH POSTOPKIH IN POSTOPKIH V ZVEZI Z ODGOVORNOSTJO NI OPERATIVNIH PODCILJEV 48.
Member States and the Commission share the responsibility to ensure that the programme is effective. 
Države članice in Komisija so skupaj odgovorne za zagotavljanje uspešnosti programa.
Article 27 of the Financial Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/200225 provides among others that specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely objectives shall be set for all sectors of activity covered by the EU budget. 
Člen 27 Finančne uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/200225 med drugim določa, da je treba opredeliti specifične, merljive, dosegljive, ustrezne in časovno opredeljene cilje za vse sektorje dejavnosti, ki jih zajema proračun EU.
The Court found that the objectives stipulated by the governing Community regulations, which are essentially high-level global objectives, have not been further developed and detailed into workable, measurable targets or sub-objectives. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so cilji iz uredb Skupnosti, ki urejajo to področje, v bistvu splošni cilji na visoki ravni, ki niso bili nadalje razviti in podrobno preneseni v izvedljive in merljive cilje ali podcilje.
Given this vagueness in the objectives, it is not surprising that, notwithstanding the legal obligation26, neither the Commission nor the Member States have set any performance indicators to monitor the achievement of objectives27. 
Zaradi te splošnosti ciljev ne preseneča, da ne Komisija ne države članice kljub zakonski obveznosti26 niso določile nobenih kazalnikov uspešnosti za spremljanje doseganja ciljev27.
Community regulations require that Member States transmit to the Commission a report on the implementation of the plan not later than 30 of June each year (n+1). 
Uredbe Skupnosti zahtevajo, da države članice Komisiji vsako leto najpozneje do 30. junija (n + 1) posredujejo poročilo o izvajanju načrta.
It should provide important information on the implementation of the plan and its verification28. 
Poročilo mora vsebovati bistvene informacije o izvajanju načrta in njegovem preverjanju28.
25 OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 
25 UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
26 Article 27 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, Financial Regulation, provides that achievement of objectives shall be monitored by performance indicators for each activity and information shall be provided by the spending authorities to the budgetary authority. 
26 Člen 27 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, tj. Finančne uredbe, določa, da se doseganje teh ciljev za vsako dejavnost spremlja s kazalci poslovanja, proračunski uporabnik pa mora proračunskemu organu zagotoviti ustrezne informacije.
Such information, as referred to in Article 33(2)(d), shall be provided annually and at the latest in the documents accompanying the preliminary draft budget. 
Informacije iz člena 33(2)(d) se posredujejo letno in najpozneje v dokumentih, ki so priloženi k predhodnemu predlogu proračuna.
27 In some Member States visited the opinion was expressed that the social objectives set by the Community regulations are more of a ‘philosophical nature’ than real measurable objectives. 
27 V nekaterih obiskanih državah članicah je bilo izraženo mnenje, da so socialni cilji, ki jih določajo uredbe Skupnosti, bolj „filozofski“ kot pa dejansko merljivi cilji.
28 The Report should indicate the amounts of products withdrawn from intervention stocks, the type, quantity and value of goods distributed, the transport and transfer costs and the number of recipients. 
28 V poročilu je treba navesti količine proizvodov, umaknjenih iz intervencijskih zalog, vrsto, količino in vrednost razdeljenega blaga, stroške prevoza in prenosa ter število prejemnikov.
The report should also specify the verification measures applied and the type and number of checks carried out, the results obtained and any cases of penalties imposed. 
V poročilu je treba navesti tudi ukrepe za preverjanje, ki so se uporabljali, ter vrsto in število opravljenih preverjanj, pridobljene rezultate in vse primere naloženih kazni.
It should also include the number of recipients over the course of the year (Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92). 
Poročilo mora prav tako vsebovati število prejemnikov v danem letu (člen 10 Uredbe (EGS) št.
The Court examined the reports required to be sent by the Member States for the period under audit and found that reports are sometimes late or incomplete. 
Sodišče je preučilo poročila, ki so jih poslale države članice za revidirano obdobje, in ugotovilo, da poročila včasih zamujajo ali so nepopolna.
Additionally, there was no evidence that the Commission makes a proper analysis and use of them. 
Poleg tega ni bilo dokazov, da jih Komisija ustrezno analizira in uporablja.
The auditors also found that the figures on final recipients provided in the report are in many cases estimations made by the charitable organisations and are not based on common standards or definitions of beneficiaries or criteria (recipients are recorded irrespectively of the frequency and the type and quantity of food received)29. 
Revizorji so prav tako ugotovili, da so številke o končnih prejemnikih v poročilih velikokrat ocene, ki so jih pripravile dobrodelne organizacije in ne temeljijo na skupnih standardih ali opredelitvah upravičencev ali merilih (prejemniki se beležijo ne glede na pogostost, vrsto in količino prejete hrane)29.
ESTIMATION OF BUDGETARY APPROPRIATIONS AND ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES BETWEEN MEMBER STATES 54. 
OCENA ODOBRENIH PRORAČUNSKIH SREDSTEV IN DODELJEVANJE SREDSTEV DRŽAVAM ČLANICAM 54.
The Court analysed the procedure used by the Commission to establish the budgetary appropriations necessary for the implementation of the programme and the allocation of resources amongst Member States. 
Sodišče je analiziralo postopek, ki ga Komisija uporablja za določitev odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, potrebnih za izvajanje programa, in dodeljevanje sredstev državam članicam.