natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition compulsory checks of areas planted by individual growers were found not to have been carried in Greece (column 3.2) exposing the Community to the risk that production aid for tobacco could be claimed as well as area-based aid for other crops (false claims). 
Poleg tega se je izkazalo, da v Grčiji niso izvajali obveznih pregledov površin, ki so jih obdelovali posamezni pridelovalci (stolpec 3.2.), kar je Skupnost izpostavilo tveganju, da bi lahko bila zahtevana tako pomoč za pridelavo tobaka kot tudi pomoč na površino za druge pridelke (lažni zahtevki).
Other cases were found in Greece and Italy (column 4) where, contrary to a Court of Justice ruling in 1997, on-the-spot controls oftobacco parcels were carried out after the tobacco had been harvested (18) thereby rendering them ineffective. 
V drugih primerih so v Grčiji in Italiji (stolpec 4) odkrili, da so kontrole parcel s tobakom na kraju samem v nasprotju s sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti iz leta 1997 izvajali po spravilu tobaka (18), zaradi česar so bile te kontrole neučinkovite.
(18) The Court of Justice, in its ruling in Case C-46/97, Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities, concluded that, in order to be considered as effective, on-the-spot checks of tobacco fields must be carried out at the time when the tobacco is still in the field. 
(18) Sodišče je v sodbi v Zadevi C-46/97, Republika Grčija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, sklenilo, da je mogoče preglede tobačnih polj na kraju samem imeti za učinkovite le v primeru, če so izvedeni v času, ko je tobak še na polju.
Since the Greek authorities had executed the controls after the harvest, Greece had to accept a 2 % flat-rate reduction of the annual premium granted. 
Ker so grške oblasti nadzor opravljale po spravilu letine, je morala Grčija sprejeti enotno 2-odstotno zmanjšanje odobrene letne premije.
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/13 (c) Checks at first processors to ensure that tobacco is not released from supervision without being processed were either not executed at all, not executed in compliance with regulations or were not sufficiently documented (columns 7 and 8). 
17.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 41/13 (c) Pregledi prvih predelovalcev, ki naj bi zagotovili, da nadzor nad tobakom traja, dokler ta ni predelan, se bodisi sploh niso izvajali bodisi niso bili izvedeni v skladu s predpisi ali pa niso bili v zadostni meri dokumentirani (stolpca 7 in 8).
Therefore, there was inadequate assurance that aid was not paid on raw tobacco submitted more than once or on tobacco imported from third countries which does not qualify for aid. (d) Some producer organisations had not complied with recognition conditions which must precede qualification for specific aid, had used the aid for ineligible purposes or had failed to achieve additionality because the specific aid was used to finance existing administrative measures instead of new activities (columns 9, 10, 12 and 13). (e) There had been failures to comply with the prohibition of producer groups from carrying out first processing. 
Posledično ni bilo mogoče z gotovostjo izključiti možnosti, da je bila pomoč za surovi tobak izplačana večkrat ali pa da je bila plačana za tobak, uvožen iz tretjih držav, ki ni upravičen do pomoči. (d) Nekatere skupine proizvajalcev niso izpolnile pogojev za priznanje, ki predstavljajo pogoj za odobritev posebne pomoči, so pomoč uporabljale za neupravičene namene ali pa niso upoštevale načela dodatnosti, ker so določeno pomoč uporabile za financiranje obstoječih upravnih ukrepov namesto za nove dejavnosti (stolpci 9, 10, 12 in 13). (e) Prihajalo je do kršitev prepovedi opravljanja prve predelave s strani skupin proizvajalcev.
This is a specific requirement of the Regulations introduced in 1993 to prevent distortion of competition and monitoring difficulties (column 11). (f) Premium and specific aid were granted in respect of cultivation contracts concluded after the regulatory deadline or which did not contain the information required for the tobacco to be eligible for aid (columns 14 and 15). 
To je posebna zahteva Uredb, vpeljana leta 1993, da bi preprečili izkrivljanje konkurence in nadzirali težave (stolpec 11). (f) Premije in posebne pomoči so bile odobrene na podlagi pogodb o pridelavi, sklenjenih po zakonskem roku, ali na podlagi pogodb, v katerih ni bilo informacij, ki so zahtevane, če naj bo tobak upravičen do pomoči (stolpca 14 in 15).
The Court notes that until June 2004, the Commission had not finalised its work and imposed financial corrections where deemed necessary (Spain, Greece, Italy). 
Sodišče opaža, da Komisija do junija 2004 ni končala dela in uveljavila finančnih popravkov, kjer je menila, da so ti potrebni (Španija, Grčija, Italija).
MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE REFORMED CMO Monitoring Verification of controls by the Commission 75. 
SPREMLJANJE IN OCENJEVANJE REFORMIRANE SKUPNE UREDITVE TRGA Spremljanje Preverjanje nadzora s strani Komisije 75.
The Court examined the work undertaken on tobacco aid in the framework of the clearance of accounts procedure which requires the Commission to perform checks to verify whether Member States have correctly interpreted and applied the regulations relating to aid schemes (19). 
Sodišče je preučilo delo, opravljeno v zvezi s pomočjo za tobak v okviru potrjevanja obračunov, ki zahteva, da Komisija opravi preverjanja, s katerimi naj bi ugotovila, ali so si države članice pravilno razlagale in uporabljale uredbe v zvezi s programi pomoči (19).
The Audit Directorate of the Directorate-General for Agriculture made control visits for tobacco to four Member States following the 1998 reform which covered the key controls indicated in Annex 6. 
Revizijski direktorat Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo je po reformi iz leta 1998 opravil kontrolne obiske v zvezi s tobakom v štirih državah članicah, ki so zadevali ključne kontrole, navedene v Prilogi 6.
The Court considers however that on the basis of the CommissionŐs guidelines regarding the calculation of financial consequences, when preparing the decisions regarding the clearance of accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Fund, a number of other controls should have been considered and classified as Ôkey controlsŐ (see Annex 7). 
Vendar pa je Sodišče mnenja, da bi bilo, upoštevaje smernice Komisije v zvezi z izračunavanjem finančnih posledic, pri pripravi odločitev v zvezi s potrjevanjem obračunov Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) potrebno kot „ključne kontrole“ obravnavati in opredeliti še nekatere druge kontrole (glej Prilogo 7).
These key controls should be examined during the clearance of accounts audit, in order to obtain reasonable assurance concerning the correctness of the accounts. 
Te ključne kontrole bi bilo treba pregledati med revizijo potrjevanja obračunov, da bi tako dobili razumna zagotovila glede pravilnosti obračunov.
The detailed rules to be applied by Member States require them to verify the moisture content of the tobacco for which aid premium is claimed. 
V skladu z izvedbenimi pravili so države članice dolžne preverjati vsebnost vlage v tobaku, za katerega se zahteva izplačilo premije.
This is needed in order to verify the permitted levels for tobacco varieties and to calculate the weight of tobacco for which aid can be claimed. 
To je potrebno za preverjanje dovoljenih ravni za posamezne sorte tobaka in za izračun teže tobaka, za katerega je mogoče zahtevati pomoč.
The CourtŐs audit of the records in Greece showed that the moisture tests carried out in relation to the 1999 to 2001 harvests were not carried out in compliance with the provisions of the legislation and no weight adjustments were made. 
Revizija zapisnikov v Grčiji, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče, je pokazala, da testi vlažnosti, opravljeni pri letinah 1999–2001, niso bili izvedeni v skladu z določbami zakonodaje, poleg tega pa niso bile izvedene ustrezne korekcije teže.
Further enquiries made by the Court established that correct checks had not been carried out since 1993. 
Nadaljnje preiskave Sodišča so pokazale, da se preverjanja niso izvajala pravilno od leta 1993.
This may explain why the CommissionŐs checks did not identify the problem. 
To utegne pojasniti, zakaj se s preverjanji s strani Komisije ni odkrilo problema.
The Audit Directorate of the Directorate-General for Agriculture was informed through different sources of the failure but had decided not to apply financial corrections even though there was a systematic lack of compliance. 
Revizijski direktorat Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo so različni viri obvestili o tej neizpolnjeni obveznosti, vendar se je ta odločil, da navkljub sistematičnemu kršenju predpisov ne bo izvedel finančnih popravkov.
The level of correction would have been between 2 and 10 % (20), applicable to all aid claims in the period, had it been imposed. 
Če bi popravke uveljavili, bi ti dosegli raven med 2 in 10 % (20), in sicer pri vseh zahtevkih za pomoč iz tega obdobja.
As part of the1998 reform proposals, the Commission suggested dropping the requirement for the control on the grounds that it was imprecise and difficult. 
Komisija je med predlogi za reformo iz leta 1998 predlagala tudi opustitev zahteve po kontroli, češ da je ta nenatančna in težavna.
The reforms finally adopted by the Council however, maintained and reinforced the requirement for this test. 
Vendar pa so reforme, ki jih je Svet nazadnje sprejel, zahtevo po tem testu ohranile in okrepile.
In 2000, the Commission expressed its intention to pursue corrections for non-compliance but only in respect of future failures. 
Leta 2000 je Komisija izrazila namen uveljavljati popravke v primeru neskladnosti s predpisi, vendar zgolj v zvezi s prihodnjimi odkloni.
The Court notes that, as EAGGF years from 1997 onwards remain open, corrective action for these years is still possible. 
Sodišče ugotavlja, da so popravki za leta od 1997 naprej še mogoči, saj v Evropskem kmetijskem usmerjevalnem in jamstvenem skladu ta leta še niso poslovno zaključena.
Inadequate review during the budgetary procedure 79. 
Neustrezen pregled med proračunskim postopkom 79.
The Financial Regulation requires that the annual budgetary procedure should ensure that the Ômobilisation of Community resources must be preceded by an evaluation to ensure that the resultant benefits are in proportion to the resources appliedŐ. 
Finančna uredba zahteva, da je v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka zagotovljeno, da „je pred uporabo sredstev Skupnosti izvedeno vrednotenje, da bi tako zagotovili, da so posledične koristi sorazmerne z uporabljenimi sredstvi“.
It further requires that all on-going operations Ômust be subject to regular reviewŐ in order to confirm their continued justification. 
Nadalje zahteva tudi, da vse tekoče operacije „morajo biti podvržene rednim pregledom“, da bi tako potrdili, da so še naprej upravičene.
Examination of the budget submissions by the Commission for tobacco from 1999 to 2002 (21) revealed them to be repetitive and lacking in evaluative comment in relation to the above criteria. 
Pri pregledu proračunskih predlog (21), ki jih je v zvezi s tobačnim sektorjem izdelala Komisija v časovnem obdobju 1999–2002, se je izkazalo, da se te predloge ponavljajo in da ne vsebujejo vrednotenj v skladu z zgornjimi kriteriji.
(20) Commission Document: Guidelines for flat-rate corrections DOC. 
(20) Dokumenti Komisije: Guidelines for flat-rate corrections (Smernice za spremembe pavšalne stopnje) DOC.
VI/5330/97 of 23 December 1997 and clearance of accounts enquiry No 99/902-ES. 
VI/5330/97 z dne 23. decembra 1997 in Clearance of Accounts Enquiry (Poizvedba glede potrditve ob-računa) št. 99/902-ES.
(21) Preliminary draft general budget of the European Commission. 
(21) Predhodni osnutek splošnega proračuna Evropske komisije.
C 41/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2005 Insufficient information was provided by Member States and by the Commission 81. 
C 41/14 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 17.2.2005 Države članice in Komisija so posredovale nezadostne informacije 81.
In order to ensure efficient and effective monitoring of the market the Commission needs relevant, accurate, complete, timely, and unbiased information. 
Da bi lahko zagotovila učinkovito in uspešno nadziranje trga, potrebuje Komisija ustrezne, točne, popolne, pravočasne in nepristranske informacije.
This is important, not only from their own point of view as managers, to ascertain whether modification of measures is required, but also where they are required to publish information to be used by interested parties. 
To je pomembno, in sicer ne le iz zornega kota Komisije, ki kot upravljavec mora ugotoviti, ali je potrebno ukrepe spremeniti, temveč tudi zaradi njej naložene objave informacij, namenjenih drugim zainteresiranim stranem.
This was not achieved as explained below. 
Kakor je pojasnjeno v nadaljevanju, ta cilj ni bil dosežen.
The CMO regulations (22) require Member States to submit data on cultivated areas, numbers of contracts, quantities, growers and first processors and estimated and actual production to enable the Commission to monitor the tobacco market. 
Uredbe skupne ureditve trga (22) od držav članic zahtevajo, da predložijo podatke o obdelanih površinah, o številu pogodb, količinah, pridelovalcih in prvih predelovalcih ter o ocenjeni in dejanski pridelavi, da bi tako Komisiji omogočile nadzor trga tobaka.
Compliance was in general satisfactory. 
Spoštovanje teh določil je bilo v splošnem zadovoljivo.
Member States are also required to submit information on cultivation contracts concerning prices, first processors, producers, quotas and the surfaces involved. 
Države članice morajo predložiti tudi informacije o pogodbah o pridelavi, ki zadevajo cene, prve predelovalce, proizvajalce, kvote in uporabljene površine.
After harvest, additional data on tobacco deliveries, sales and stocks must also be provided. 
Po spravilu letine morajo posredovati dodatne podatke o dobavah tobaka, prodaji in zalogah.
For the 1999 harvest only Germany, a small-scale producer, submitted the information on time. 
Za leto 1999 je informacije pravočasno predložila le Nemčija – majhna proizvajalka.
In respect of the 2000 harvest, the information was supplied by all the Member States, except for Italy. 
Za letino 2000 so informacije predložile vse države članice razen Italije.
For the 2001 and 2002 harvests the situation deteriorated and only three and four Member States respectively submitted the information on time. 
Pri letinah 2001 in 2002 se je stanje poslabšalo – v prvem primeru so informacije pravočasno predložile zgolj tri, v drugem pa zgolj štiri države članice.
The Commission is required to publish timely and up-to-date lists of first processing undertakings approved to sign cultivation contracts (23). 
Komisija je dolžna objavljati pravočasne in ažurne sezname podjetij za prvo predelavo, ki smejo podpisovati pogodbe o pridelavi (23).
Examination showed that the Commission only published such lists after the deadline for signing contracts. 
Preiskava je pokazala, da je Komisija take sezname objavljala šele po poteku roka za podpisovanje pogodb.
This exposed growers and producer organisations to the risk of contracting with non-approved first processors and losing the right to aid. 
Posledično so bili pridelovalci in skupine proizvajalcev izpostavljeni tveganju, da bodo pogodbe sklepali z neodobrenimi prvimi predelovalci in tako izgubili pravico do pomoči.
The 1998 reform required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council, before 1 April 2002, a report on the functioning of the CMO in raw tobacco. 
V skladu z reformo iz leta 1998 je bila Komisija dolžna Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu pred 1. aprilom 2002 predložiti poročilo o delovanju skupne ureditve trga surovega tobaka.
The Commission, considering that the information it had asked for would be insufficient for the purpose of producing the required report, requested additional information from the Member States. 
Komisija, ki je bila mnenja, da bodo informacije, za katere je prosila, nezadostne za izdelavo zahtevanega poročila, je države članice zaprosila za dodatne informacije.
It carried out additional work to provide the necessary factual information which was processed and made available to Parliament and the Council in a report in November 2002 (24). 
Opravila je dodatno delo, da bi priskrbela potrebne informacije o dejstvih, ki jih je obdelala ter jih Parlamentu in Svetu predložila v poročilu novembra 2002 (24).
(22) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 (OJ L 358, 27.12.1988, p. 
2848/98 (UL L 358, 31.12.1998, str. 17) in Uredba Komisije (ES) št.
17) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2636/1999 (OJ L 323, 15.12.1999, p. 
2636/1999 (UL L 323, 15.12.1999, str. 4).
(23) Article 54(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98. 
(23) Člen 54(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 2848/98.
SEC(2002) 1183 of 6 November 2002. 
SEC(2002) 1183 z dne 6. novembra 2002.
The external evaluation concluded that the CMO was not achieving the intended impact 85. 
Zunanje ocenjevanje je pokazalo, da skupna ureditev trga ni prinesla želenega učinka 85.
The Commission engaged external consultants to provide an analysis/evaluation of the market for the period 1993 to 2001. 
Komisija je zunanjim svetovalcem naložila pripravo analize/ocene trga za obdobje 1993–2001.
Their report was made public in October 2003 (25) and their findings are similar to those of the Court. 
Njihovo poročilo je bilo objavljeno oktobra 2003 (25), njihove ugotovitve pa so podobne ugotovitvam Sodišča.
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/15 (g) although management was generally more effective, especially in terms of reducing costs and time and of increasing transparency in the management of premium, system weaknesses remained; for example, an excessively bureaucratic approach to activities and financial stress for producer groups caused by the time lag between calculation and payment of the variable premium. 
17.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 41/15 (g) čeprav je bilo upravljanje v splošnem učinkovitejše, še posebej z vidika zmanjševanja stroškov in porabe časa ter povečevanja transparentnosti upravljanja s premijami, so bile sistemske slabosti še naprej prisotne; tako je denimo na dejavnosti negativno vplival pretirano birokratski pristop, poleg tega pa je časovni zamik med obračunom in izplačilom spremenljive premije pomenil finančni pritisk za skupine proizvajalcev.
It envisaged a phased decoupling of the existing aid from production over a period of three years accompanied by a phasing out of the Tobacco Fund (which, in the meantime would continue to fund anti-smoking information campaigns). 
Predvidela je postopno ločevanje obstoječe pomoči od proizvodnje, in sicer v obdobju treh let, ki bi ga spremljala opustitev Tobačnega sklada (ki bi v vmesnem času še naprej financiral protikadilske informativne kampanje).
A specific financial envelope would be established for the restructuring of tobacco-producing areas. 
Za prestrukturiranje območij, kjer pridelujejo tobak, bi bil narejen poseben finančni okvir.
The approved reform will begin from 2006 with the transfer of all or part of current tobacco premium into entitlements to a single farm payment. 
Odobrena reforma se bo začela leta 2006 s pretvorbo celote ali dela sedanje tobačne premije v upravičenost do enotnega izplačila za kmetijo.
With full implementation, the reform will redistribute 50 % of the current tobacco production premium to the single farm payment and 50 % to the restructuring envelope. 
Ko bo reforma uveljavljena v celoti, bo prerazporedila 50 % sedanje premije za proizvodnjo tobaka v enotna izplačila za kmetijo, 50 % pa v okvir za prestrukturiranje.
It is expected that, in the short term, cultivation of less-profitable tobacco varieties will cease and farmers will be encouraged to convert to other forms of land use. 
Pri-čakovati je, da se bo pridelava manj dobičkonosnih vrst tobaka v kratkem roku končala, kmete pa bodo spodbujali k preusmerjanju k drugim oblikam uporabe zemlje.
How the reform will address the weaknesses identified by the audit 92. 
Kako bi se lahko s pomočjo predlagane reforme odpravilo pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je odkrila revizija 92.
The reform has the potential to reduce the mismatch between internal supply and demand. 
Reforma lahko zmanjša neskladje med notranjo ponudbo in povpraševanjem.
There would no longer be an incentive for the producer to grow tobacco with the main objective of obtaining the premium. 
Proizvajalcev ne bi več spodbujala h gojenju tobaka, zato da bi dobil premijo.
Producers would be encouraged to respond to the demands of the market. 
Proizvajalce bi spodbujala k temu, da se odzivajo na povpraševanje na trgu.
There will no longer be a need for a production threshold system with the objective of guiding production. 
Sistem proizvodnih pragov, namenjen vodenju proizvodnje, ne bo več potreben.
The reform will also do away with the production quota system and thereby the need for quota transfers, quota buy back and reserves. 
Reforma bo odpravila tudi sistem proizvodnih kvot in s tem tudi potrebo po prenosih kvot, odkupih kvot in rezervah kvot.
Reinforcement of structural measures also has the potential to improve the viability of tobacco holdings which have, up to now, been inhibited by the rigid production quota system. 
Tudi krepitev strukturnih ukrepov utegne izboljšati sposobnost tobačnih posestev za preživetje, ki jih je doslej omejeval togi sistem proizvodnih kvot.
It should also improve professional training of producers allowing them to improve production techniques and quality. 
Izboljšala naj bi tudi strokovno usposabljanje proizvajalcev, tako da bi ti lahko izboljšali proizvodne metode in kakovost.
The switch to the single farm payment scheme and the cross-compliance system will make payments dependent on the respect of environmental requirements thus replacing the present ineffective system linked to the specific aid to producer groups. 
S prehodom na shemo enotnih izplačil za kmetije in sistem navzkrižne skladnosti bodo postala plačila odvisna od upoštevanja okoljskih zahtev in tako nadomestila sedanji neučinkoviti sistem, povezan s posebno pomočjo za skupine proizvajalcev.
Finally, it will remove one of the agriculture support systemŐs most complex and expensive control systems. 
Naposled, odpravila bo enega najkompleksnejših in najdražjih nadzornih sistemov znotraj sistema podpor za kmetijstvo.
The Court regrets the CommissionŐs contradictions within its replies which makes the reading of this report more difficult. 
Sodišče obžaluje protislovja v odgovorih Komisije, zaradi katerih je branje tega poročila težje.
87. emerges is that the CMO has not achieved any material beneficial change in most areas (or cannot conclude in the absence of relevant data) although the continuity of support through aid has permitted growers to survive. 
87. vanja, da skupna ureditev trga na večini področij ni dosegla nikakršnih bistvenih koristnih sprememb (ali pa o tem zaradi pomanjkanja relevantnih podatkov ni mogoče sklepati), da pa je nadaljevanje podpiranja prek pomoči pridelovalcem omogočilo preživetje.
Even today (26), tobacco production without aid is not viable for the tobacco growing community. 
Celo danes (26) proizvodnja tobaka brez pomoči za proizvajalce ni rentabilna.
FURTHER REFORM OF THE CMO Assessment of options for reform of the CMO 88. 
NADALJNJA REFORMA SKUPNE UREDITVE TRGA Ocena možnih izbir za reformo skupne ureditve trga 88.
In July 2002, the Commission published its mid-term review of the CAP as a whole. 
Julija 2002 je Komisija objavila svoj vmesni pregled skupne kmetijske politike kot celote.
It proposed a new strategy for sustainable development which would decouple support from production and provide support to farmers through a payment scheme based on the support payments previously received by the farmer in a reference period. 
Predlagala je novo strategijo za trajnostni razvoj, ki bi podporo ločila od proizvodnje ter bi kmetom nudila podporo preko sheme izplačil, temelječe na predhodnih izplačilih podpore, ki jih je kmet prejemal v referenčnem obdobju.