natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It also restructured direct payments, which, as of 2015, are broken down into a basic per-hectare payment for all farmers, a ‘greening payment’ by which farmers are rewarded for specific agricultural practices considered beneficial for the climate and the environment and a payment for young farmers. 
Poleg tega je prestrukturirala neposredna plačila, ki so od leta 2015 naprej razdeljena na osnovno plačilo na hektar za vse kmete, „zeleno plačilo”, s katerim so kmetje nagrajeni za posebne kmetijske prakse, ki štejejo kot koristne za podnebje in okolje, ter na plačilo za mlade kmete.
Within certain limits, Member States have significant leeway and can further target payments in order to address specific policy concerns5. 
V okviru nekaterih omejitev imajo države članice precej manevrskega prostora in lahko še dodatno ciljno usmerijo plačila, da bi obravnavale specifične težave na področju politike5.
1 Article 39(1)(a) and (b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) (OJ L 326, 26.10.2012, p. 
1 Člen 39(1)(a) in (b) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) (UL L 326, 26.10.2012, str.
Other CAP objectives laid down in Article 39 are (c) to stabilise markets, (d) to assure the availability of supplies and (e) to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices. 
Drugi cilji SKP, določeni v členu 39, so: (c) stabilizirati trge, (d) zagotoviti redno preskrbo in (e) zagotoviti, da je preskrba potrošnikom dostopna po primernih cenah.
2 Article 110 (2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
2 Člen 110(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o financiranju, upravljanju in spremljanju skupne kmetijske politike in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št.
3 See also preamble to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
3 Glej tudi uvodne izjave Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št.
4 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
1311/2013 z dne 2. decembra 2013 o večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2014–2020 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str.
5 For an overview of the options chosen by Member States see Annex I. in relation to farmers’ incomes 
5 Za pregled možnosti, za katere so se države članice odločile, glej Prilogo I. z dohodki kmetov
Introduction 11 04 Although they are not particularly clearly stated in the regulation6, the Commission considers certain policy elements to be specifically related to supporting farmers’ incomes, in particular direct payments. 
Uvod 11 4Čeprav nekateri elementi politike v uredbi6 niso posebej jasno navedeni, Komisija meni, da se posebej nanašajo na podpiranje dohodkov kmetov, zlasti neposrednih plačil.
These payments intend to help keep farming in place throughout the territory of the EU by supporting and stabilising farmers’ incomes, thereby ensuring the longer-term economic viability of farms and making them less vulnerable to price fluctuations. 
Ta plačila naj bi pripomogla k ohranjanju kmetovanja na celotnem ozemlju EU s podpiranjem in stabilizacijo dohodkov kmetov ter posledično z zagotavljanjem dolgoročne ekonomske sposobnosti preživetja kmetij in njihove manjše občutljivosti na nihanje cen.
In addition, by making full payments conditional upon respecting basic standards (known as cross-compliance) and by applying the specific ‘greening’ component, these payments should also help ensure that agriculture provides public goods for society. 
Poleg tega naj bi s tem, ko so celotna plačila postala odvisna od upoštevanja osnovnih standardov (imenovanih navzkrižna skladnost), in z uporabo posebnega „zelenega plačila” pomagala zagotoviti, da kmetijstvo zagotavlja javne dobrine za družbo.
05 Although financially the most important, direct payments are not the only instrument that affects farmers’ incomes. 
5Neposredna plačila so sicer finančno najpomembnejša, vendar niso edini instrument, ki vpliva na dohodke kmetov.
At EU level, they are accompanied by rural development7 measures and a set of market and promotion measures which aim at specific agricultural sectors. 
Na ravni EU jih spremljajo ukrepi razvoja podeželja7 in sklop tržnih in promocijskih ukrepov, namenjenih specifičnim kmetijskim sektorjem.
The Commission may also intervene in specific markets in times of crisis by opening limited access to public or private intervention storage, which influences market prices and thus farmers’ incomes. 
Komisija lahko na določenih trgih intervenira tudi v kriznih časih, in sicer z odprtjem omejenega dostopa do javnih ali zasebnih intervencijskih zalog, kar vpliva na tržne cene in posledično na dohodke kmetov.
Farmers’ incomes, the income of farm households and standard of living 06 Family farming is the most common farming model in the EU, with the vast majority of agricultural holdings still managed as individual holdings8. 
Dohodki kmetov, dohodki gospodinjstev kmetij in življenjska raven 6Družinsko kmetovanje je najpogostejši model kmetovanja v EU, pri katerem se velika večina kmetijskih gospodarstev še vedno upravlja kot posamezna go-spodarstva8.
Such holdings are typically characterised by the extensive use of family labour. The income situation of this type of farm household is displayed in the Figure. 
Za tovrstna gospodarstva je običajno značilna obsežna uporaba dela družinskih članov. Dohodkovni položaj tovrstnega gospodinjstva kmetije je prikazan na sliki.
EU legislation has never defined the concepts of ‘agricultural community’, a ‘fair standard of living’ or ‘earnings’ mentioned in the treaty, but the disposable income of the farm household is a key element for assessing the standard of living9. 
V zakonodaji EU niso bili nikoli opredeljeni pojmi „kmetijska skupnost”, „primerna življenjska raven” ali „zaslužek”, navedeni v Pogodbi, vendar je razpoložljivi dohodek gospodinjstva kmetije eden ključnih elementov za oceno življenjske ravni9.
6 Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ L 347 of 20.12.2013, p. 
6 Uredba (EU) št. 1307/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o pravilih za neposredna plačila kmetom na podlagi shem podpore v okviru skupne kmetijske politike ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
7 Such as investment measures or payments to farmers in areas facing natural or other specific constraints. 
7 Kot so naložbeni ukrepi ali plačila kmetom na območjih z naravnimi ali drugimi posebnimi omejitvami.
8 The term ‘family farm’ is used to refer to any farm under family management where 50 % or more of the regular agricultural labour force is provided by family workers. 
8 Izraz „družinska kmetija” se uporablja za vse kmetije z družinskim vodenjem, na katerih 50 % ali več redne kmetijske delovne sile zagotavljajo družinski delavci.
According to Eurostat, in 2010 97 % of the agricultural holdings in the EU were managed by individual holders. 
Po podatkih Eurostata so leta 2010 97 % kmetijskih gospodarstev v EU upravljali posamezni imetniki.
9 See paragraphs 64 and 65 of Special Report No 14/2003 on the measurement of farm incomes by the Commission Article 33(1)(b) of the EC Treaty (OJ C 45, 20.2.2004, p. 
9 Glej odstavka 64 in 65 Posebnega poročila št.
1). Introduction 12 Components of farm household income + Market receipts + Subsidies = + Other receipts = –– = = Gross receipts Cash expenses + Depreciation Farm income Net operating income Farm income Total farm household income + Gross wages and salaries + Property income + Social transfers + Other income = = – Taxes and mandatory contributions Disposable farm household income Off-farm income Source: OECD (2003). 
1). Uvod 12 Sestavni deli dohodkov gospodinjstva kmetije + tržni prihodki + subvencije = + drugi prihodki = –– = = bruto prihodki gotovinski stroški + amortizacija dohodek kmetije neto dohodek iz poslovanja dohodek kmetije skupni dohodek gospodinjstva kmetije + bruto plače + dohodek od lastnine + socialni transferji + drugi dohodki = = – davki in obvezni prispevki razpoložljivi dohodek gospodinjstva kmetije dohodki zunaj kmetije Vir: OECD (2003).
The Commission’s data sources for incomes in agriculture 07 The Commission has to define the necessary statistical framework to measure farmers’ incomes, while Member States should provide the Commission with all the information necessary for monitoring and evaluation of the measures concerned. 
Viri podatkov o dohodkih v kmetijstvu, ki jih uporablja Komisija 7Komisija mora opredeliti potrebni statistični okvir za merjenje dohodkov kmetov, države članice pa bi morale Komisiji zagotoviti vse informacije, potrebne za spremljanje in vrednotenje zadevnih ukrepov.
As far as possible, the information needed should be based on established sources of data10. 
Potrebne informacije bi morale v največji mogoči meri temeljiti na priznanih virih podatkov10.
08 The Commission’s principal source of general data about the agricultural population is the farm structure survey (FSS)11, which collects data on the agricultural situation across the EU for monitoring trends and transitions in the structure of European agricultural holdings. 
8Glavni vir splošnih podatkov o kmetijskem prebivalstvu, ki ga uporablja Komisija, je raziskovanje strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev11, v okviru katerega se zbirajo podatki o razmerah v kmetijstvu v celotni EU za spremljanje trendov in sprememb strukture evropskih kmetijskih gospodarstev.
It is not designed to collect data on agricultural income of farmers or on EU support financed by the EAGF. 
Raziskovanje ni zasnovano za zbiranje podatkov o kmetijskih dohodkih kmetov ali o podpori EU, ki jo financira EKJS.
10 Article 110(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. 
10 Člen 110(4) Uredbe (EU) št.
11 Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 (OJ L 321, 1.12.2008, p. 
1306/2013. 11 Uredba (ES) št. 1166/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o raziskovanjih strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev in metod kmetijske proizvodnje ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št.
The last EU-wide FSS in the form of an agricultural census took place in 2010. 
Zadnje raziskovanje strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev v celotni EU v obliki popisa kmetijskih gospodarstev je bilo izvedeno leta 2010.
The next sample survey is planned for 2016. 
Naslednje vzorčno raziskovanje je načrtovano za leto 2016.
Figure Introduction 13 09 The Commission uses two main statistical instruments to monitor economic activities and income from agriculture and certain farm-related business activities: ο the economic accounts for agriculture (EAAs), a basic tool for analysing the macroeconomic situation of a country’s agricultural sector and changes in agricultural income; ο the farm accountancy data network (FADN), a microeconomic tool whose objective is to assess incomes and business activities of commercial agricultural holdings. 
Uvod 13 9Komisija za spremljanje gospodarskih dejavnosti in dohodkov iz kmetijstva in nekaterih s kmetijo povezanih poslovnih dejavnosti uporablja dva glavna statistična instrumenta: ο ekonomske račune za kmetijstvo (ERK), ki so osnovno orodje za analiziranje makroekonomskih razmer v kmetijskem sektorju v določeni državi in sprememb pri kmetijskih dohodkih; ο mrežo za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov s kmetijskih gospodarstev (FADN), ki je mikroekonomsko orodje, namenjeno oceni dohodkov in poslovnih dejavnosti komercialnih kmetijskih gospodarstev.
10 The EAAs are a satellite account of the European System of Accounts (ESA 95), which provide additional information and employ concepts suited to the agricultural sector12. 
10 ERK so satelitski račun evropskega sistema računov (ESA 95), ki zagotavlja dodatne informacije in uporablja koncepte, prilagojene kmetijskemu sektorju12.
They follow a specific methodology and are compiled using specific rules and methods13. 
Uporabljajo posebno metodologijo in se sestavljajo z uporabo posebnih pravil in me-tod13.
For larger Member States, the EAAs are subdivided into regional accounts. 
Za večje države članice so ERK razdeljeni še na regionalne račune.
Data collection and aggregation at national level is entirely financed by the Member States, and national statistical institutes or ministries of agriculture are responsible for data collection and the calculation of national EAAs. 
Zbiranje podatkov in njihovo združevanje na nacionalni ravni v celoti financirajo države članice, nacionalni statistični uradi ali ministrstva za kmetijstvo pa so odgovorni za zbiranje in izračunavanje podatkov nacionalnih ERK.
The Commission (Eurostat) is responsible for establishing the methodology and aggregating the data at EU level. 
Komisija (Eurostat) je pristojna za vzpostavitev metodologije in združevanje podatkov na ravni EU.
11 The FADN is designed to estimate the income of commercial agricultural holdings as a business unit, whose production value, measured in standard output, exceeds a certain threshold of what is considered to cover the largest possible share of agricultural output, agricultural area and agricultural labour of those holdings run with a market orientation14. 
11 Mreža FADN je zasnovana za ocenjevanje dohodkov komercialnih kmetijskih gospodarstev kot poslovnih enot, katerih vrednost proizvodnje, merjena s standardnim rezultatom, presega določen prag, za katerega se šteje, da zajema največji možni delež kmetijske proizvodnje, kmetijskih površin in kmetijske delovne sile tistih gospodarstev, ki so tržno orientirana14.
It is the only harmonised source of economic data on agricultural holdings at EU level15 and is managed by the Commission’s DG Agriculture and Rural Development. 
Mreža je edini usklajeni vir ekonomskih podatkov o kmetijskih gospodarstvih na ravni EU15. Upravlja jo Generalni direktorat Komisije za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja.
As it is based on national accountancy data networks, the Member States finance data collection but the Commission pays a standard fee per holding for the data received from Member States16. 
Temelji na nacionalnih mrežah računovodskih podatkov. Države članice financirajo zbiranje podatkov, Komisija pa za podatke, ki jih prejme od držav članic, plača standardno pristojbino za vsako gospodarstvo16.
Currently, national liaison agencies (public or private bodies) collect data from more than 80 000 agricultural holdings across all Member States. 
Trenutno nacionalni organi za zvezo (javni ali zasebni) zbirajo podatke z več kot 80 000 kmetijskih gospodarstev iz vseh držav članic.
Participation in the survey is voluntary. 
Sodelovanje v raziskovanju je prostovoljno.
Data are used by the Commission and many other stakeholders, including Member States. 
Podatke uporabljajo Komisija in mnogi drugi deležniki, vključno z državami članicami.
12 Regulation (EC) No 138/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 December 2003 on the economic accounts for agriculture in the Community (OJ L 33, 5.2.2004, p. 1). 
138/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. decembra 2003 o ekonomskih računih za kmetijstvo v Skupnosti (UL L 33, 5.2.2004, str. 1).
13 The calculation of agricultural income under the EAAs is shown in Annex II. 
13 Izračun kmetijskih dohodkov v okviru ERK je prikazan v Prilogi II.
14 The calculation of income under the FADN is shown in Annex III. 
14 Izračun dohodkov v okviru FADN je prikazan v Prilogi III.
A holding is not identical to a farm household and it is possible that one farmer manages several agricultural holdings. 
Gospodarstvo ni enako gospodinjstvu kmetije in možno je, da en kmet upravlja več kmetijskih gospodarstev.
15 Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 of 30 November 2009 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Union (OJ L 328, 15.12.2009, p. 
1217/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi mreže za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov o dohodkih in poslovanju kmetijskih gospodarstev v Evropski skupnosti (UL L 328, 15.12.2009, str.
16 For the accounting years from 2010 to 2014 the Commission has so far paid 51.4 million euro in standard fees. 
16 Za obračunska leta od 2010 do 2014 je Komisija doslej izplačala 51,4 milijona EUR standardnih pristojbin.
Introduction 14 Performance measurement of CAP measures in 12 Each CAP measure must be monitored and evaluated in order to improve its quality and demonstrate its achievements17. 
Uvod 14 Merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov 12 Vsak ukrep SKP je treba spremljati in ovrednotiti, da se izboljša njegova kakovost in pokažejo njegovi dosežki17.
The performance measurement of CAP measures in relation to agricultural income is based in large part on the information contained in the EAAs and the FADN, which therefore must be sufficient and of good quality. 
Merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP, povezanih s kmetijskimi dohodki, večinoma temelji na informacijah iz ERK in FADN, ki morajo zato biti zadostne in kakovostne.
13 By 31 December 2018, the Commission has to present the initial report on the implementation of monitoring and evaluation, including the first results of the performance of the CAP for 2014-2020. 
13 Komisija mora do 31. decembra 2018 predstaviti prvo poročilo o izvajanju spremljanja in vrednotenja, vključno s prvimi rezultati smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju SKP za obdobje 2014–2020.
A second report including an assessment of the performance of the CAP shall be presented by 31 December 2021. 
Drugo poročilo, vključno z oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri SKP, naj bi bilo pripravljeno do 31. decembra 2021.
14 With the 2013 CAP reform, the common monitoring and evaluation framework (CMEF), already applied for the EAFRD, was also applied to measures financed from the EAGF18. 
14 Z reformo SKP iz leta 2013 se je skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja (CMEF), ki se že uporablja za EKSRP, uporabljal tudi za ukrepe, ki se financirajo iz EKJS18.
In order to fulfil its responsibility of monitoring and evaluation of the measures financed by the EAGF the Commission must establish what information is necessary and draw up a multiannual evaluation plan. 
Da bi Komisija izpolnila svojo odgovornost za spremljanje in vrednotenje ukrepov, ki jih financira EKJS, mora opredeliti, katere informacije so potrebne, in pripraviti večletni načrt vrednotenja.
Member States should ensure that such data are of good quality and available in a timely manner. 
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da so te informacije kakovostne in pravočasno na voljo.
15 The CMEF is based on standard indicators in order to make a comprehensive and regular assessment of the progress, effectiveness and efficiency of the measures against objectives. 
15 Okvir CMEF temelji na standardnih kazalnikih, ki omogočajo celovito in redno oceno napredka, uspešnosti in učinkovitosti ukrepov glede na cilje.
The Commission has established a set of indicators19 to describe the implementation of the CAP instruments (output indicators), to measure what results are achieved (result indicators) and to show what impact they have on the achievement of the general objectives of the CAP (impact indicators)20. 
Komisija je določila sklop kazalnikov19 za opisovanje izvajanja instrumentov SKP (kazalniki realizacij), merjenje doseženih rezultatov (kazalniki rezultata) in za prikaz njihovega učinka na doseganje splošnih ciljev SKP (kazalniki učinka)20.
17 See also recital 68 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. 
17 Glej tudi uvodno izjavo 68 Uredbe (EU) št.
18 Article 110 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. 
1306/2013. 18 Člen 110 Uredbe (EU) št.
19 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 834/2014 of 22 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of the common monitoring and evaluation framework of the common agricultural policy (OJ L 230, 1.8.2014, p. 1). 
834/2014 z dne 22. julija 2014 o določitvi predpisov za uporabo skupnega okvira spremljanja in vrednotenja skupne kmetijske politike (UL L 230, 1.8.2014, str. 1).
20 For details see Annex IV. relation to agricultural income 
20 Za podrobnosti glej Prilogo IV. SKP v zvezi s kmetijskimi dohodki
Introduction 15 Previous Court audits 16 The Court audited the Commission’s measurement of farmers’ incomes in 200221. 
Uvod 15 Prejšnje revizije, ki jih je opravilo Sodišče 16 Sodišče je revidiralo merjenje dohodkov kmetov v letu 2002, ki ga je opravila Ko-misija21.
This audit concluded that the EU statistical instruments did not provide sufficiently exhaustive information on the disposable incomes of farm households and did not allow an assessment of the living standard of the agricultural community to be made. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da statistični instrumenti EU niso zagotavljali dovolj izčrpnih informacij o razpoložljivih dohodkih gospodinjstev kmetij in niso omogočali ocene življenjske ravni kmetijske skupnosti.
17 In its annual report for the financial year 2007, the Court observed, with regard to the measurement of farmers’ incomes, that the Commission had taken a number of initiatives regarding the EAAs and the FADN22. 
17 Sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za proračunsko leto 2007 v zvezi z merjenjem dohodkov kmetov ugotovilo, da je Komisija sprejela številne pobude v zvezi z ERK in FADN22.
However, the Court considered that more complete statistics and indicators were indispensable in order to follow more closely the performance of the CAP of which more than two thirds of the budgetary resources were devoted to income support. 
Vendar je Sodišče menilo, da so za pozornejše spremljanje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju SKP, od katere sta več kot dve tretjini proračunskih virov namenjeni dohodkovni podpori, nujno potrebni popolnejši statistični podatki in kazalniki.
21 Special Report No 14/2003. 
21 Posebno poročilo št. 14/2003.
22 Annual report concerning the financial year 2007 paragraph 5.66 (OJ C 286, 10.11.2008, p. 1). 
22 Odstavek 5.66 letnega poročila za proračunsko leto 2007 (UL C 286, 15.12.2001).
Audit scope 16 and approach 18 The monitoring and evaluation of the CAP requires good-quality information on the economic situation of agriculture and farmers’ incomes. 
Obseg revizije 16 in revizijski pristop 18 Spremljanje in vrednotenje SKP zahteva kakovostne informacije o gospodarskih razmerah v kmetijstvu in dohodkih kmetov.
The most significant risk is not having sound statistical information and relevant indicators at European level. 
Največje tveganje pri tem je, da ni zanesljivih statističnih informacij in ustreznih kazalnikov na evropski ravni.
More specifically, there is a risk that the indicators and criteria for measuring farmers’ incomes may not be properly defined or that appropriate data may not be available or not be of sufficient quality. 
Natančneje, obstaja tveganje, da kazalniki in merila za merjenje dohodkov kmetov morda niso ustrezno opredeljeni ali da ustrezni podatki morda niso na voljo ali dovolj kakovostni.