natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The European Refugee Fund (ERF) is the very first Community legal instrument to be adopted in the field of asylum and immigration. 
Evropski sklad za begunce (ESB) je prvi pravni akt, ki ga je Skupnost sprejela na področju azila in priseljevanja.
A shared management approach was chosen to implement the Fund to highlight the fact that the aid provided under this instrument is more effective and better targeted if co-financed projects take account of the situation and needs in each Member State. 
Kot način izvajanja ESB je bilo deljeno upravljanje izbrano zato, da bi poudarili, da bo podpora, zagotovljena s pomočjo tega instrumenta, učinkovitejša in bolje usmerjena, če bodo ukrepi sofinanciranja temeljili na razmerah in potrebah v vsaki državi članici posebej.
According to the Council decision, the Commission is assisted by a Committee, consisting of representatives of the Member States, which is responsible in particular for adopting the rules governing eligibility of expenditure. 
V skladu s sklepom Sveta Komisiji pomaga odbor, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic, zlasti pri sprejemanju pravil o upravičenosti izdatkov.
The Commission has proposed that the Council adopt some of the improvements called for by the Court in the annual reports covering previous years. 
Komisija je Svetu predlagala, da sprejme določene izboljšave, za katere se zavzema Sodišče in ki so navedene v letnih poročilih preteklih let.
On the basis of the CommissionŐs proposals the Council has accepted amendments to the legislation for the period 2005 to 2010 which will simplify the implementing arrangements. 
Na osnovi predlogov Komisije je Svet sprejel pravne spremembe za obdobje 2005–2010, ki poenostavljajo pravila za izvajanje.
Target groups have been more carefully defined for ERF II as a result of the adoption of new Community directives on asylum. 
Sprejetje novih direktiv Skupnosti na področju azila je omogočilo natančnejšo opredelitev ciljnih skupin za ESB II.
The Commission has proposed new financial instruments for the period 2007 to 2013 under a framework programme on solidarity and management of migration flows. 
Komisija je nove finančne instrumente za obdobje 2007–2013 predstavila v okvirnem programu „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“.
The rules governing these financial instruments resolve many of the problems highlighted by the Court in its report. 
Določbe teh finančnih instrumentov razjasnijo velik del problemov, ki jih je Računsko sodišče predstavilo v tem poročilu.
The final evaluation of ERF 2000 to 2004 follows a long series of analyses by the Member States and the Commission. The Commission had external consultants carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the ERF 2000 to 2004. 
Končna ocena ESB 2000–2004 je bila izdelana po številnih analizah tako na ravni držav članic kot na ravni služb Komisije. Poleg tega se je Komisija za celotno oceno ESB v obdobju 2000–2004 obrnila na zunanje svetovalce.
The consultants presented their 1 125-page report in March 2006. THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES 
Poročilo študije svetovalcev, ki obsega 1 125 strani, je na voljo od marca 2006. ODGOVORI KOMISIJE
C 178/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 31.7.2007 The Commission does, however, acknowledge that the final report published in December 2006 should have been sent to the other Institutions by September 2005. 
C 178/20 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 31.7.2007 Vendar Komisija priznava, da bi moralo biti končno poročilo, objavljeno decembra 2006, drugim institucijam posredovano pred septembrom 2005.
In some cases, Eurostat stated that it was unable to comment on or check alternative data proposed for the ERF allocation by Member States. 
V nekaterih primerih je Eurostat navedel, da ni mogel razložiti ali preveriti drugih podatkov, ki so jih za dodelitev sredstev ESB predložile države članice.
This took place only when Member States failed to supply appropriate metadata, when disaggregations by month and/or citizenship were not supplied (meaning that the internal consistency of the data could not be tested) or when there were unexplained discrepancies with data previously supplied. 
To se je zgodilo le, kadar države članice niso predložile ustreznih metapodatkov, kadar razčlenitev po mesecih in/ali državljanstvu ni bila na razpolago (to pomeni, da se ni dalo preveriti notranje usklajenosti podatkov) ali v primeru nepojasnjenih odstopanj od predhodno predloženih podatkov.
The Commission considers that it already takes account of the variability of statistics in calculating budget allocations by Member State since these allocations are based on the previous three years, i.e. the impact of ex post revisions is spread over time. 
Komisija meni, da je pri izračunu proračunskih dodelitev državam članicam že upoštevala variabilnost statističnih podatkov, saj dodelitve temeljijo na podatkih zadnjih treh let.
The Commission acknowledges that in the process of establishing the statistics to be used for the allocation for the first two years of the ERF I the outcome of exchanges of information between Member States and the Commission should have been better documented. 
Komisija potrjuje, da bi morali biti pri pripravi statističnih podatkov, ki bodo uporabljeni za dodeljevanje v prvih dveh letih ESB I, rezultati izmenjave informacij med državami članicami in Komisijo bolje dokumentirani.
However, efforts were undertaken, as in the case of Italy, to make the adjustments in the best possible way. 
Vendar je bilo vloženega veliko truda, kot v primeru Italije, da bi se to izboljšalo na najustreznejši način.
The communication procedures in place between Eurostat and the Member States in order to establish the asylum statistics reflect accepted practice adopted for other areas of statistics. 
Postopki komunikacije, ki poteka med Eurostatom in državami članicami za ureditev statističnih podatkov na področju azila, kažejo sprejeto prakso, ki se uporablja za statistične podatke na drugih področjih.
This is a transparent process and offers adequate opportunities for Member States to check and validate/revise their national data. 
To je pregleden postopek, ki državam članicam daje ustrezne možnosti, da preverijo in potrdijo oziroma popravijo svoje podatke.
Harmonised statistical data were not yet available at EU level when the ERF was set up and the Commission proposed a pragmatic and fair approach to the Council and Parliament. 
Ko je bil ESB ustanovljen, na ravni Evropske unije še ni bilo usklajenih statističnih podatkov. Komisija je Svetu in Parlamentu predlagala, naj ukrepata pragmatično in pravično.
Delays at the beginning of a new programme are inevitable for the adoption of implementing rules. 
Na začetku novega programa so zamude pri sprejemanju pravil za izvajanje neizogibne.
The Commission recognises that there was a certain delay (1) caused by the necessary consultations with the Member States and translation deadlines. 
Komisija priznava, da je zaradi potrebnega posvetovanja z državami članicami in rokov za prevode prišlo do določene zamude (1).
However the Commission worked closely with the Member States during the elaboration of the implementing rules, therefore the delays in finalisation of the texts did not contribute to the difficulties of the Member States in administering the programme. 
Vendar je Komisija pri oblikovanju pravil za izvajanje tesno sodelovala z državami članicami, zato zamude pri dokončanju besedil niso prispevale k težavam, ki so jih imele države članice z upravljanjem programa.
(1) Decision 2000/596/CE establishing the European Refugee Fund was adopted on 28 September 2000. 
(1) Odločba 2000/596/ES o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce je bila sprejeta 28. septembra 2000.
The Commission adopted Decision C(2001) 736 on eligibility of expenditure and reports on implementation in the context of actions co-financed by the ERF on 20 March 2001. 
Komisija je 20. marca 2001 sprejela Odločbo C(2001) 736 glede upravičenosti izdatkov in poročil o izvajanju v zvezi z dejavnostmi, ki jih sofinancira ESB.
The Commission adopted Decision C(2001) 4372 on the management and control systems as well as the process for the implementation of financial corrections on 18 December 2001. 
Komisija je 18. decembra 2001 sprejela Odločbo C(2001) 4372 o upravljanju, sistemih nadzora in postopku izvajanja finančnih popravkov.
20 to 22. based on data available, in constant dialogue with Member States. 
20. do 22. novi razpoložljivih podatkov in se pri tem ves čas posvetovala z državami članicami.
There was no common statistical definition in 2000 of the target groups and the methodology for collecting statistics on asylum claims. 
Za leto 2000 ni bilo skupne statistične opredelitve ciljnih skupin in metodologije zbiranja statističnih podatkov o prošnjah za azil.
The Member StatesŐ annual data collection exercises were not specifically related to the CommissionŐs requirements. 
Države članice pri letnem zbiranju podatkov niso posebej upoštevale zahtev Komisije.
The harmonisation in this field (definition of terms, procedure of data collection) took longer than expected. 
Usklajevanje na tem področju (opredelitev pojmov, postopek zbiranja podatkov) je trajalo dlje, kot je bilo pričakovano.
The Commission has put in place tools to improve the quality and reliability of the data collection. 
Komisija je oblikovala orodja za izboljšanje kakovosti in zanesljivosti zbiranja podatkov.
This process has improved gradually between 2000 and 2004 and is still on going. 
Postopek zbiranja podatkov se je v letih med 2000 in 2004 postopoma izboljševal in še vedno traja.
This reflects the complexity of the asylum systems and the large differences between the Member States in terms of how asylum applications and decisions are defined and counted. 
To kaže na zapletenost azilnih sistemov in velike razlike v tem, kako države članice opredeljujejo in obravnavajo prošnje za azil ter z njimi povezane odločitve.
The availability of the statistical data required for the allocation of the Fund was reduced due to the absence of specific statistical legislation obliging Member States to supply asylum data to Eurostat. 
Razpoložljivost statističnih podatkov, ki so potrebni za dodelitev sredstev Sklada, se je zmanjšala zaradi pomanjkanja posebne zakonodaje na področju statistike, ki bi države članice obvezovala, da Eurostatu pošiljajo podatke o azilu.
Certainly in the first years of this data collection, much data was not yet systematically and timely supplied by Member States. 
V prvih letih zbiranja podatkov države članice podatkov seveda še niso pošiljale sistematično in pravočasno.
The provisional approach therefore had to be continued longer than expected. 
Zato je bilo treba z začasnim pristopom nadaljevati dlje, kot je bilo pričakovano.
Meanwhile, the Commission brought forward a proposal in September 2005 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics on migration and international protection (COM (2005) 375 final). 
Medtem je Komisija septembra 2005 predložila predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statističnih podatkih Skupnosti o selitvah in mednarodni zaščiti (COM(2005) 375 konč.).
This proposal represents an important step towards harmonised Community statistics on migration and asylum and should further improve the situation. 
Ta predlog pomeni velik korak k usklajenim statističnim podatkom Skupnosti o selitvah in azilu, s katerim bi se morale razmere še izboljšati.
The Commission did not have a mandate to undertake audits of the asylum systems or the statistical data produced. 
Komisija ni imela pristojnosti za izvedbo revizij azilnih sistemov ali zbranih statističnih podatkov.
Some of the differences in interpretation of statistical data are due to differing national legislation but the data are still reliable. 
Določene razlike v statistični razlagi se dajo pojasniti z različnimi nacionalnimi zakonodajami, ne da bi pod vprašaj postavili zanesljivost podatkov.
The Commission recognises that the gathering of statistical data was hampered by a number of factors but considers that, in the final analysis, it has done its utmost to draw up an equitable basis for the allocation of funds and this has been confirmed by the external independent evaluation of ERF I. The Commission shared the budgetary resources 
Komisija priznava, da zbiranje statističnih podatkov ovirajo različni dejavniki, vendar je za vzpostavitev pravične osnove za razdeljevanje proračunskih sredstev vložila veliko truda, kar potrjuje tudi zunanja neodvisna ocena ESB I. Komisija je proračunska sredstva razdelila na os-
31.7.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/21 27. 
31.7.2007 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 178/21 27.
The ERF was based on the principle of allocation of funds and programming at Member State level, both on an annual basis. 
ESB je bil zasnovan na osnovi vsakoletnega dodeljevanja sredstev in načrtovanja na ravni držav članic.
Consequently the Commission had to reconcile prior national programming with the need to adjust allocations according to the amounts approved by the budgetary authority. 
Iz tega logično sledi, da je morala Komisija uskladiti načrtovanje programa na ravni držav članic in potrebno prilagoditev podpore zneskom, ki jih je sprejel proračunski organ.
Programming principles were improved for the subsequent ERF 2005 to 2013 phase but the approach was the same. 
Načela načrtovanja so bila za naslednje faze ESB 2005–2013 izboljšana v mejah zmožnosti, a logika je ostala nespremenjena.
Given the unavoidable time required for examination and approval of annual programmes, the Commission had no choice but to ask Member States to draw up their programmes on the basis of provisional budgetary data and to adjust them in the light of the final data. 
Ker časa, ki je potreben za pregled in sprejetje letnih programov, ni mogoče skrajšati, Komisija nima druge izbire kot pozvati države članice, naj pri načrtovanju upoštevajo začasne proračunske podatke in ga pozneje prilagodijo v skladu s končnimi podatki.
Under the FundŐs legal basis co-financing requests enable Member States to define their annual programming of actions between the measures eligible under the ERF with justifications in terms of national needs rather than simply take over the overall budget allocations. 
V skladu s pravno podlago zahtevek za sofinanciranje državam članicam omogoča, da natančno določijo letni program ukrepov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje ESB, so upravičeni glede na nacionalne potrebe in se ne omejujejo le na splošne proračunske dodelitve.
The Commission takes the view that the example of 2003 demonstrates the incompatibility of the EUŐs budgetary procedure timetable and that for ERF I programming. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da primer iz leta 2003 dokazuje, da je časovni razpored proračunskega postopka Unije in časovni razpored načrtovanja ESB I resnično težko uskladiti.
The initial timetable proposed by the Commission was changed during negotiation of the legal basis. 
Prvotni časovni razpored, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, je bil na pogajanjih o pravni podlagi spremenjen.
Individual co-financing decisions by Member States are preceded by a decision allocating funds between Member States, by the transmission and analysis of Member StatesŐ annual programmes and consultation of the Committee of Member StatesŐ representatives. 
Pred sprejetjem odločb o sofinanciranju za vsako državo članico posebej se sprejme odločba o dodelitvi sredstev za vse države članice skupaj, izvede prenos in analiza letnih programov držav članic ter posvetovanje z odborom držav članic.
Each of these stages takes several weeks. 
Za vsakega od teh korakov je potrebnih več tednov.
31 to 33. 
31. do 33.
Under ERF II, the Commission is able to disburse up to 100 % of funds for the second pre-financing given to the Member States. 
V okviru ESB II Komisija lahko v drugem pred-plačilu izplača do 100 % sredstev, namenjenih državam članicam.
Consequently, the Member State has the possibility to disburse up to 100 % to the final beneficiary, without prejudice to the Member StateŐs own payment procedures. 
Zato lahko države članice do 100 % sredstev izplačajo končnemu upravičencu, brez poseganja v svoje lastne postopke izplačevanja.
The new scheduling of payments will be beneficial to all organisations, regardless of their size. 
Z novim razporedom izplačil bodo pridobile vse organizacije, ne glede na svojo velikost.
Co-financing of voluntary repatriation of failed or rejected asylum seekers is eligible under the ERFŐs legal basis and the Statement by the ECRE (European Council on Refugees and Exiles) reflects a position which has nothing to do with the ERFŐs scope and implementing rules. 
Sofinanciranje prostovoljnih povratkov neuspešnih prosilcev za azil je v skladu s pravno podlago ESB upravičeno, izjava Evropskega sveta za begunce in izgnance (ECRE) pa kaže na zavzetje stališča, ki ni povezano s področjem in načinom uporabe ESB.
The Commission considers the definition of persons eligible for repatriation is generally adequate. 
Na splošno Komisija meni, da opredelitev oseb, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za vračanje, ni neprimerna.
Co-financing of the repatriation of any national from a non-EU country, including candidate countries before the entry into force of the acts of accession, is compatible with the ERF. 
Sofinanciranje vračanja vseh oseb iz tretjih držav, vključno z državami pristopnicami pred začetkom veljavnosti aktov o pristopu, je v skladu z ESB.
Consequently there was no question of applying different treatment to non-EU nationals according to whether or not they came from candidate countries or belong to target groups for the measures co-financed by the ERF (reception, integration or return). 
Zato nikakor ne bi smeli različno obravnavati oseb iz tretjih držav glede na to, ali prihajajo iz države pristopnice ali ne, saj gre za ciljne skupine ukrepov, ki jih sofinancira ESB (sprejem, vključevanje in vračanje).
The positive examples mentioned by the Court demonstrate that the legal provisions and guidance provided by the Commission have helped the Member States which wished to do so to build sound control systems. 
Pozitivni primeri, ki jih navaja Sodišče, poudarjajo, da pravne določbe in vodenje Komisije lahko državam članicam, ki bi to želele, omogočijo vzpostavitev trdnega kontrolnega sistema.
The Commission considers that monitoring covers all contacts with Member States and not simply on-the-spot visits. 
Komisija meni, da dejavnosti spremljanja zajemajo odnose z državami članicami v celoti in ne le obiskov v državah članicah.
The meetings of the Committee of Member State representatives have, for example, provided an opportunity for specific guidance to be given on the ERFŐs rules. 
Seje odbora držav članic so na primer omogočile sprejetje posebnih smernic za različna pravila ESB.
The Commission has established a programme of on-the-spot visits to assist Member States within the constraints of its available resources even though it is not required to do so under the ERF I legal basis. 
V skladu s pomanjkanjem sredstev in kljub temu, da je k upoštevanju te določbe ne obvezuje pravna podlaga ESB, je Komisija vzpostavila program obiskov v državah članicah njim v pomoč.
In view of the serious problems found by the Commission in the United Kingdom, the Director-General of DG JLS entered a reservation about this situation in his annual reports for 2004 and 2005. 
Zaradi resnih nepravilnosti, ki jih je Komisija ugotovila v Združenem kraljestvu, je generalni direktor GD JLS v svojih letnih poročilih za leti 2004 in 2005 v zvezi s tamkajšnjimi posebnimi razmerami izrazil svoje pridržke.
The Commission has proposed a 5 % financial correction for 2000 and 2001 reflecting the United KingdomŐs responsibility for the shortcomings observed and this has been accepted by the United Kingdom. 
Komisija je Združenemu kraljestvu predlagala finančni popravek v višini 5 % za leti 2000 in 2001 zaradi ugotovljenih nepravilnosti, za katere je odgovorna država članica, kar je Združeno kraljestvo sprejelo.
The closure procedure for 2002 to 2004 has not yet been completed. 
Postopek zaključevanja za leta od 2002 do 2004 še poteka.
The excessive volume of delegated tasks in Austria was identified by the Commission during a monitoring visit and immediately pointed out to the national authorities. 
Komisija je v okviru „spremljanja“ na obisku v Avstriji ugotovila prevelik obseg prenesenih nalog, o čemer je takoj obvestila nacionalne organe.
In the light of the CourtŐs findings relating to Italy, the Commission has set in train two measures: an ex post inspection of ERF 2000 to 2004 and a monitoring visit to check control systems for ERF II. 
Glede ugotovitev Sodišča v zvezi z Italijo Komisija načrtuje dva ukrepa: naknadni nadzor ESB 2000–2004 in spremljanje kontrolnih sistemov za ESB II v okviru obiska države članice.
The ex post inspection, which is being finalised, will make a detailed examination of the way in which the ERF was implemented and check that the procedures used for calls for proposals were compatible with the provisions governing the FundŐs legal basis. 
Misija naknadnega nadzora, ki natančno preiskuje pogoje izvajanja ESB vključno s skladnostjo postopkov zbiranja predlogov z določbami pravne podlage, je skoraj končana.
34 and 35. ment based on shared management was to enable Member States to tailor general measures to national needs. 
34. do 35. ljenim upravljanjem je, da se državam članicam omogoči, da splošne ukrepe prilagodijo nacionalnim potrebam.
The fact that objectives vary from one Member State to the next within the constraints of the FundŐs legal basis is considered by the Commission to be evidence of the correct use of the ERF by Member States and a guarantee of its effectiveness. The evaluation carried out by the Commission on the basis of a report by external experts for the ERF 2000 to 2004 phase demonstrated the effectiveness and worth of this approach. 
Ob upoštevanju pravne podlage so različni cilji držav članic za Komisijo dokaz, da so države članice ESB pravilno sprejele, in zagotovilo za njegovo učinkovitost. Ocena obdobja 2000–2004 ESB, ki jo je Komisija oblikovala na podlagi poročila zunanjih strokovnjakov, potrjuje, kako zelo je bil ta pristop učinkovit in pozitivno sprejet.
The Commission considers that the repatriation measure could be used to co-finance return flights. 
Komisija meni, da bi lahko ukrepe vračanja uporabili za sofinanciranje letov v izvorne države.
The list of measures in the legal basis illustrating the concept of prior information and advice is indicative only. 
Seznam ukrepov, predstavljenih v pravni podlagi, ki pojasnjuje pojem predhodnih informacij in svetovanja, je dejansko le okviren.
The main objective of having a financial instru- 
Glavni cilj uporabe finančnega instrumenta z de-
C 178/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 31.7.2007 At a more general level the Commission will ensure that the shortcomings noted by the Court are corrected when annual programmes are closed and, where applicable, during its monitoring visits. 
C 178/22 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 31.7.2007 Na splošno bo Komisija pri zaključevanju letnih programov in, če bo potrebno, v okviru svojih obiskov za spremljanje zagotovila, da se odpravijo morebitne nepravilnosti, na katere opozarja Sodišče.
The ERF is based first and foremost on the idea of solidarity between Member States so that the costs of reception, integration and repatriation of refugees and displaced persons are spread equally within the EU. 
ESB na prvem mestu temelji na solidarnosti med državami članicami, ki Uniji omogoča razporeditev finančnega bremena sprejemanja, vključevanja ter vračanja beguncev in razseljenih oseb.
Council Decision 2000/596/EC does not contain any reference to public spending obligations, and this is why additionality was not a issue for ERF I. 42. 
Odločba Sveta 2000/596/ES se ne sklicuje na obveznost javne porabe, kar še potrjuje dejstvo, da pri ESB I načelo dodatnosti ne velja. 42.