natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court also noted that delays in implementing projects concerning domestic water supplies caused by additional requests imposed by environmental impact assessments, difficulties in obtaining administrative permits, inaccurate estimates or calculations could have been partly avoided by better planning (SR No 9/2010, paragraph 51). _____________ (27) SR No 8/2010, paragraph 46; SR No 9/2010, paragraph 51; SR No 5/2010, paragraph 71. EN 
Sodišče je prav tako ugotovilo, da bi bilo mogoče zamude pri izvajanju projektov za oskrbo gospodinj­ stev z vodo, ki so jih povzročile dodatne zahteve zaradi presoj vplivov na okolje, težave pri pridobivanju upravnih dovoljenj in netočne ocene ali izračuni, delno preprečiti z boljšim načr­ tovanjem (Posebno poročilo št. 9/2010, odstavek 51). _____________ (27) Posebna poročila št. 8/2010, odstavek 46; št.
EN 222 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Controls and performance monitoring 8.45. Some of the Court’s observations(28) encouraged managers to improve systems of internal control, and to monitor performance by setting up appropriate mechanisms to record information and data on the achieved outcomes or on the level of performance. 
SL 8. 10.
8.46. For example, the Court observed that the reviews carried out to monitor EU-funded interventions in basic education in sub-Saharan Africa focussed in general on the processes and financial issues linked to specific disbursement conditions rather than on education outcomes (SR No 12/2010, paragraph 62). 
8.46 Sodišče je na primer opazilo, da so pregledi, ki se izvajajo pri spremljanju intervencij za osnovno izobraževanje v podsaharski Afriki, ki jih financira EU, bolj kot na izide izobraževanja običajno osredotočeni na procese in finančna vprašanja, povezane s posebnimi pogoji za izplačilo (Posebno poročilo št.
Similarly, it observed that the Local Action Groups responsible for implementing the Leader programme did not collect data on or assess whether local strategy objectives were met (SR No 5/2010, paragraph 31). 
12/2010, odstavek 62). Podobno je ugotovilo, da lokalne akcijske skupine, odgovorne za izvajanje programa Leader, niso zbirale podatkov o doseganje ciljev lokalne stra­ tegije niti preverjale, ali so bili doseženi (Posebno poročilo št.
TheCourtalsonoted,however,efficientaspectsofthe supervisory and control systems, such as the role of the verifi­ cations carried out by the Food and Veterinary Office for maintaining a necessary control pressure (SR No 14/2010, paragraph 67), or the development by the Commission of a sound approach for controls on simplified customs procedures (SR No 1/2010, paragraph 81). 
5/2010, odstavek 31). 8.47 Sodišče pa je opazilo tudi učinkovite vidike nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov, kot je vloga preverjanj, ki jih izvaja Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo, za ohranjanje potrebnega kontrolnega pritiska (Posebno poročilo št.
8.48. TheCourtunderlinedinoneofitsreports(SRNo 10/2010, paragraph 40) the usefulness of an annual assessment of the programmes’ implementation, indicating that such assessment enabled managers to bring effective modifications to ongoing programmes. 
10/ 2010, odstavek 40) je Sodišče poudarilo uporabnost letne ocene izvajanja programov, pri čemer je navedlo, da je takšna ocena vodstvenim delavcem omogočila uspešno prilagajanje tekočih programov.
In relation to Leader, the Commission has provided further guidance to Member States on how to better monitor, assess and improve the Local Action Groups' (LAGs) strategies and their respective achievements. 
8.46 Komisija je v zvezi s pristopom Leader državam članicam zagotovila dodatne smernice za boljše spremljanje, ocenjevanje in izboljšanje strategij lokalnih akcijskih skupin (LAS) ter njihovih dosežkov.
It has also launched in early 2011 a Focus Group on the quality of local development strategies, including monitoring and evaluation issues, under the European Network for Rural Devel­ opment. 
V začetku leta 2011 je v okviru evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja oblikovala tudi ciljno skupino za kakovost lokalnih razvojnih strategij, vključno z vprašanji glede spremljanja in vrednotenja.
The results, which will be available by the end of the year, will provide further tools and good practice to both Member States and LAGs. 
Rezultati, ki bodo na voljo konec leta, bodo državam članicam in LAS zagotovili dodatna orodja in dobro prakso.
The Food and Veterinary Office is constantly assessing both the effectiveness and the efficiency of its control work to ensure that resources are put to the best use. 
8.47 Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo stalno ocenjuje uspešnost in učinkovitost svoje kontrole za zagotovitev najprimernejše uporabe sredstev.
8.48. The Commission has set common performance indicators whose assessment will help further improving the POSEI and the smaller Aegean Islands schemes. 
8.48 Komisija je oblikovala skupne kazalnike uspešnosti, katerih ocene bodo pripomogle k nadaljnjemu izboljšanju programa POSEI in programov za manjše egejske otoke.
In relation to education sector policy support programmes financed by sectoral budget support, progress against outcome indicators (enrolment, completion, survival, and learning achievements in some cases) is assessed in Joint Reviews with other donors, led by the partner country. 
V zvezi z izobraževanjem je glede programov podpore sektorske politike, ki so financirani s sektorsko proračunsko podporo, napredek pri kazalnikih izida (vpis, dokončanje, napredovanje in v nekaterih primerih učni dosežki) ocenjen v skupnih pregledih z drugimi donatorji, ki jih vodi partnerska država.
When agreeing performance monitoring arrangements with partners, the Commission considers that a good mix of outcome and process indicators provides the necessary compre­ hensive picture of the progress of the country in implementing its sector policy. 
Kar zadeva dogovore o načinih spremljanja delovne uspešnosti s partnerji, Komisija meni, da dobra kombinacija kazalnikov izida in procesa zagotavlja potrebno celovito sliko napredka države pri izvajanju njene sektorske politike.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 223 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Court’s observations concerning achievements and reporting Achievement of the objectives set 8.49. TwooftheCourt’sreportsconcludepositivelyon results achieved through interventions financed by the EU budget (SRs No 8/2010 and No 10/2010). The Court found that EU co-financed rail infrastructure projects delivered the planned infrastructure to specification, and, once completed, have created new and improved rail transport possibilities on key sections of the Priority Projects (SR No 8/2010, paragraph 65). 
10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 223 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A Opažanja Sodišča o dosežkih in poročanju Doseganje zastavljenih ciljev 8.49 Sodišče je v dveh poročilih prišlo do pozitivnih zaključkov o rezultatih, doseženih z intervencijami, financira­ nimi iz proračuna EU (posebni poročili št.8/2010 in 10/ 2010). Ugotovilo je, da je bila v okviru železniških infrastruk­ turnih projektov, ki jih je sofinancirala EU, načrtovana infra­ struktura zgrajena v skladu s specifikacijo, kar je po zaključku projektov prineslo nove in izboljšane možnosti za železniški promet na ključnih odsekih prednostnih projektov (Posebno poročilo št.
Regarding specific measures for agriculture in favour of the outermost regions of the Union and the smaller Aegean islands, the programmes were in general implemented effectively and thus met the needs of these regions (SR No 10/2010, paragraph 82). 
Programi v okviru posebnih ukrepov za kmetijstvo v korist najbolj oddaljenih regij Unije in manjših egejskih otokov so se na splošno izvajali uspešno in tako zadostili potrebam v teh regijah (Posebno poročilo št 10/ 2010, odstavek 82).
Otherspecialreportspresentmoremixedresults,with some important objectives not met (SRs No 6/2010, No 9/2010, No 12/2010 and No 13/2010). 
6/2010, št.
The Court observed that where there are conflicting objectives it is difficult for them to be achieved simultaneously (SR No 6/2010, paragraphs 93 and 99). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je težko sočasno doseči naspro­ tujoče si cilje (Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, odstavka 93 in 99).
Whilst structural measures spending has contributed to improving the supply of water for domestic use, better results could have been achieved at a lower cost to the EU budget (SR No 9/2010, paragraph 71). 
Čeprav je poraba za strukturne ukrepe prispevala k izbolj­ šanju oskrbe gospodinjstev s pitno vodo, bi bilo mogoče doseči boljše rezultate z nižjimi stroški za proračun EU (Posebno poročilo št. 9/2010, odstavek 71).
Reporting on performance 8.51. In its reports, the Court drew attention (29) to the need for appropriate reporting structures and relevant, comparable and reliable data to enable assessment of the correspondence between the objectives fixed and the results obtained. 
Poročanje o smotrnosti poslovanja 8.51 Sodišče je v svojih poročilih opozorilo (29) na potrebo po ustreznih strukturah za poročanje ter po relevantnih, primerljivih in zanesljivih podatkih, da se lahko oceni ujemanje zastavljenih ciljev z doseženimi rezultati.
8.52. InitsreportontheLeonardodaVincimobility scheme, the Court noted that as the annual work programme was structured differently from the annual activity report, it was not possible to make a meaningful comparison of results against planned performance (SR No 4/2010, paragraph 41). 
8.52 V svojem poročilu o programu mobilnosti Leonardo da Vinci je ugotovilo, da smiselna primerjava rezultatov z načrtovanim delom ni mogoča, ker je letni program dela struk­ turiran drugače kot letno poročilo o dejavnostih (Posebno poročilo št.
The Court also observed that the Commission and the Member States were not able to establish the effectiveness of Leader programmes in delivering of rural development outcomes in the absence or unreliability of data either in absolute terms or in relation to the effec­ tiveness of other delivery methods (SR No 5/2010, paragraph 100). _____________ (29) SR No 4/2010, paragraph 41; SR No 5/2010, paragraph 100. 
4/2010, odstavek 41). Prav tako je opazilo, da Komisija in države članice niso mogle opredeliti, kako uspešni so bili programi Leader pri doseganju izidov na področju razvoja podeželja, tako v absolutnem smislu kot v povezavi z uspešnostjo drugih metod, ker ni bilo podatkov ali pa so bili ti nezanesljivi (Posebno poročilo št.
The objectives of the 2006 reform of the EU sugar market are directly linked to the objectives of the common agricultural policy (CAP), which are enshrined in the Treaties. 
SL 8.50 Cilji reforme trga sladkorja v EU iz leta 2006 so nepo­ sredno povezani s cilji skupne kmetijske politike (SKP), ki so zajeti v Pogodbah.
It is not a shortcoming of the reform to have partly diverging objectives, but rather a result of its comprehensive scope. 
Delno različni cilji niso pomanjkljivost reforme, ampak so posledica njenega širokega obsega.
The Commission considers that the sugar reform has successfully managed the restructuring of the sector, providing it with a long-term policy framework and considerably improving its competitiveness. 8.52. 
Komisija meni, da je reforma sektorja sladkorja povzročila prestrukturiranje sektorja, pri čemer mu je zagotovila dolgoročen okvir politike in bistveno izboljšala njegovo konkurenčnost.
With regard to the Leonardo da Vinci mobility scheme — as announced in the action plan in reply to the Court's report — an internal working group of DG Education and Culture revised the requirements and form of the Yearly National Agency Report in the second quarter of 2011. 
8.52 V zvezi s programom mobilnosti Leonardo da Vinci je mednarodna delovna skupina GD za izobraževanje in kulturo, kot je bilo napovedano v akcijskem načrtu v odgovoru na poročilo Sodišča, v drugem četrtletju leta 2011 revidirala zahteve in obliko letnega poročila nacionalnih agencij.
The revised report form is now in line with the structure and content of the National Agency work programme revised for 2011. 
Revidirana oblika poročila je zdaj skladna s strukturo in vsebino delovnega programa nacionalnih agencij, revidiranega za leto 2011.
As a consequence the Yearly NA Report on the year 2011 (to be received by the Commission in 2012) will allow meaningful comparison of results against planned performance. 
Posledično bo letno poročilo nacionalnih agencij za leto 2011 (ki ga bo Komisija prejela leta 2012) omogočalo smiselno primerjavo rezultatov z načrtovanim izva­ janjem.
EN 224 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S The mid-term evaluation of Leader+ took place at an early stage in LAG strategy implementation. 
SL 224 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Vmesno vrednotenje programa Leader+ se je izvedlo na zgodnji stopnji izvajanja strategije LAS.
However, the ex-post evaluation of Leader+, which was finalised in December 2010, provides useful information on the effectiveness and efficiency of Leader interventions. 
Vendar naknadno vrednotenje programa Leader+, ki je bilo končano decembra 2010, zagotavlja koristne informacije o uspešnosti in učinkovitosti intervencij programa Leader.
This information will be useful in the context of the ongoing work on the post-2013 CAP policy framework. 
Te informacije bodo koristne za tekoče delo v zvezi z okvirom SKP po letu 2013.
The Commission agrees that departure of actual achievements from the planned targets could be better explained in future Annual Activity Reports. 
8.53 Komisija se strinja, da bi se lahko odstopanje med dejan­ skimi dosežki in načrtovanimi ožjimi cilji v prihodnjih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih bolje pojasnilo.
According to Article 60(7) of the Financial Regulation, it is the efficiency and effectiveness of the internal control system which has to be reported in the AAR and not the efficiency and effectiveness of the EU actions. 
Glede na člen 60(7) finančne uredbe je treba v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih poročati o učinkovitosti in uspešnosti sistema notranje kontrole, ne pa o učinkovitosti in uspešnosti ukrepov EU.
The content of the AAR is defined according to the requirements of this provision. 
Vsebina letnega poročila o dejavnostih je opredeljena glede na zahteve te določbe.
In any case, thanks to the line of consistency provided by the ABB nomenclature, the human and financial resources (as shown in Annexes 2 and 3) allocated to each ABB activity are clearly identified and can be linked with the indicators in the corresponding Annex, thus making it possible to assess the economy and efficiency in the management of the resources available. 8.54. 
V vsakem primeru so zaradi vrste doslednosti iz nomenkla­ ture proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti človeški in finančni viri (kot je prikazano v prilogah 2 in 3), namenjeni vsaki dejavnosti proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti, jasno opredeljeni in se lahko povežejo s kazal­ niki v ustrezni prilogi, zaradi česar je mogoče oceniti gospodarnost in učinkovitost upravljanja razpoložljivih sredstev.
For multiannual programmes it is not always meaningful to set interim milestones, as impacts will only be reached in a non-linear way at the end of the programming period. 
8.54 Za večletne programe ni vedno smiselno določiti vmesnih mejnikov, ker bodo učinki doseženi samo na nelinearen način na koncu programskega obdobja.
The annual reporting on inputs, outputs and results, i.e. the monitoring of the progress in programme implementation, does allow for a regular assessment of the progress towards the attainment of the objectives. 
Letno poročanje o vložkih, izložkih in rezultatih, tj. spremljanje napredka pri izvajanju programa, omogoča redno ocenjevanje napredka pri doseganju ciljev.
For rural development, the Commission established a Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) for the 2007-2013 programming period. 
8.56 V zvezi z razvojem podeželja je Komisija za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 oblikovala skupni okvir spremljanja in vredno­ tenja.
It provides for the first time a single framework for monitoring and evaluation of all rural devel­ opment interventions on the basis of common indicators. 
Ta prvič zagotavlja enoten okvir za spremljanje in vrednotenje vseh intervencij za razvoj podeželja na podlagi skupnih kazalnikov.
Within this framework, the responsibility for the provision of reliable monitoring data relies on the Member States, in line with the repar­ tition of competences under shared management. 
Glede na navedeno so za zagotavljanje zanesljivih podatkov o sprem­ ljanju odgovorne države članice v skladu s porazdelitvijo pristojnosti v okviru deljenega upravljanja.
Considering the high number of projects and the broad range of Member States' project specificities, it is neither feasible nor cost effective for the Commission to verify at project level data provided by the Member States. 
Glede na veliko število projektov in širok obseg specifičnosti projektov držav članic ni niti izvedljivo niti stro­ škovno učinkovito, da bi Komisija na ravni projekta preverjala podatke, ki jih predložijo države članice.
See also reply to point 8.29. 
Glej tudi odgovor na točko 8.29.
As noted at the beginning of this chapter, the Financial Regulation provides that the Annual Activity Reports shall indicate the results of the operations by reference to the objectives set, the risks associated with these operations, the use made of resources provided and the effi­ ciency and effectiveness of the internal control system (30). 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 8.53 Kot je bilo navedeno na začetku tega poglavja, finančna uredba določa, da morajo letna poročila o dejavnostih prikazovati rezultate poslovanja glede na določene cilje, tveganja, povezana s tem poslovanjem, uporabo odobrenih sredstev ter učinkovitost in uspešnost sistema notranjih kontrol (30).
The Court observed that the differences between planned targets and achievements were often not analysed (see paragraph 8.16) and that the framework for reporting on effectiveness did not cover economy and efficiency of the spending (see paragraph 8.17). 8.54. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da razlike med načrtovanimi ožjimi cilji in dosežki pogosto niso bile analizirane (glej odstavek 8.16) in da okvir za poročanje o smotrnosti poslo­ vanja ni zajel gospodarnosti in učinkovitosti porabe (glej odstavek 8.17).
The absence of appropriate interim milestones hindered the assessment of whether the progress made could be considered on track towards the achievement of multi­ annual objectives (see paragraphs 8.20 and 8.21). 
8.54 Pomanjkanjeustreznihvmesnihmejnikovjeoviralo ugotavljanje, ali se dosega napredek pri doseganju večletnih ciljev (glej odstavka 8.20 in 8.21).
8.55. TheCourtnotedthattheobjectives,indicatorsand targets set in the Management Plans were generally those used for reporting in the Annual Activity Reports (see paragraphs 8.24 and 8.25). 
8.55 Sodišče je opazilo, da so bili cilji, kazalniki in ožji cilji, določeni v načrtih upravljanja, v glavnem uporabljeni tudi za poročanje v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih (glej odstavka 8.24 in 8.25).
8.56. Legallimitationsandpracticalconstraintsimpaired the reliability of the planning and reporting information collected by the DGs from Member States regarding programmes under shared management (see paragraphs 8.27 to 8.29). _____________ (30) Article 60(7), second subparagraph, of the Financial Regulation. 
8.56 Zakonske in praktične omejitve so slabo vplivale na zanesljivost informacij o načrtovanju in poročanju, ki so jih generalni direktorati pridobili od držav članic v zvezi s programi v okviru deljenega upravljanja (glej odstavke 8.27 do 8.29). _____________ (30) Drugi pododstavek člena 60(7) finančne uredbe.
Insufficient or weak planning, including the absence of SMART objectives, may produce delays, additional costs, and affect the results achieved (see paragraphs 8.33 to 8.44). 8.58. 
Nezadostno ali slabo načrtovanje, vključno s pomanjkanjem ciljev v obliki SMART, lahko povzroči zamude in dodatne stroške ter vpliva na dosežene rezultate (glej odstavke 8.33 do 8.44).
It is important for the management’s accountability that the results reported correspond to the objectives and indicators set in the management plan and that appropriate monitoring and control systems are in place to obtain reliable information for reporting on results (see paragraphs 8.45 to 8.48 and 8.51 to 8.52). 8.59. 
8.58 Za odgovornost vodstva je pomembno, da rezultati, o katerih se poroča, ustrezajo ciljem in kazalnikom, določenim v načrtu upravljanja, ter da so vzpostavljeni ustrezni sistemi za spremljanje in kontrolo, da se pridobijo zanesljive informacije za poročanje o rezultatih (glej odstavke 8.45 do 8.48 ter 8.51 in 8.52).
TheCourtmakesthefollowingrecommendations: — Recommendation 1: Increased focus should be put on performance in the DG Annual Activity Reports, in particular by analysing differences between planned targets and achievements as well as by reporting on the economy and efficiency of EU funding (see paragraph 8.53). — Recommendation 2: The Commission services should define appropriate interim milestones for multiannual targets, so that progress can be assessed adequately (see paragraph 8.54). — Recommendation 3: The Commission and the Member States within the context of their respective responsibilities under shared management should agree on consistent performance indicators and ensure the reliability of information on planned targets and achieved results (see paragraph 8.56). 
8.59 Sodišče izreka naslednja priporočila: — Priporočilo 1: V letnih poročilih o dejavnostih generalnih direktoratov bi bilo treba več pozornosti nameniti smotr­ nosti poslovanja, zlasti z analiziranjem razlik med načrto­ vanimi ožjimi cilji in dosežki ter s poročanjem o gospo­ darnosti in učinkovitosti financiranja EU (glej odstavek 8.53). — Priporočilo 2: Službe Komisije bi morale opredeliti ustrezne vmesne mejnike za večletne ožje cilje, tako da bi bilo mogoče ustrezno ocenjevati napredek (glej odstavek 8.54). — Priporočilo 3: Komisija in države članice bi si morale v kontekstu svojih odgovornosti v okviru deljenega upra­ vljanja prizadevati za dogovor o skladnih kazalnikih smotr­ nosti poslovanja ter zagotoviti zanesljivost informacij o načrtovanih ožjih ciljih in doseženih rezultatih (glej odstavek 8.56).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 8.57. The Commission agrees on the importance of the planning phase and the need to rely on SMART objectives. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 8.57 Komisija se strinja s pomenom faze načrtovanja in potrebo po opiranju na cilje SMART.
8.58. The Commission agrees that it is important for the management’s accountability that the results reported correspond to the objectives and indicators set in the management plan and that appropriate monitoring and control systems should be in place to obtain reliable information for reporting on results. 
8.58 Komisija se strinja, da je za odgovornost vodstva pomembno, da rezultati, o katerih se poroča, ustrezajo ciljem in kazalnikom, določenim v načrtu upravljanja, ter da bi morali biti vzpostavljeni ustrezni sistemi za spremljanje in kontrolo, da se prido­ bijo zanesljive informacije za poročanje o rezultatih.
The Commission is committed to constantly improving its monitoring and control systems to ensure that they are appropriate and adequate to deliver the necessary information reliably. 
Komisija je zavezana k stalnemu izboljševanju svojih sistemov za spremljanje in kontrolo, da zagotovi njihovo primernost in zadostnost pri podajanju potrebne zanesljivosti informacij.
8.59. — Differences between planned targets and actual achievement against objectives set could indeed be better explained. 
8.59 — Razlike med načrtovanimi ožjimi cilji in dejanskim dosežkom pri zastavljenih ciljih bi se lahko dejansko bolje pojasnile.
However, MP and AAR are not intended to provide detailed information on economy and efficiency (See replies to paragraphs 8.17 and 8.53). 
Vendar načrt upravljanja in letno poročilo o dejavnostih nista namenjena zagotavljanju podrobnih informacij o gospodarnosti in učinkovitosti (glej odgovora na odstavka 8.17 in 8.53).