natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3 The obligation to report to the Supervisory Committee on cases that are still open after nine months should be considered in the context of the Supervisory Committee’s role of reinforcing the independence of the Office. 
3 Pri obveznosti poročanja nadzornemu odboru o primerih, ki so po devetih mesecih še vedno v obravnavi, je treba upoštevati vlogo nadzornega odbora, da spodbuja neodvisnost urada.
Historically, the purpose of this reporting was to prevent an interference by the Institutions in OLAF’s independent case work. Special Report No 2/2011 — Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office 
Prej je bil namen poročanja preprečevanje vmešavanja institucij v samostojno obravnavo primerov urada OLAF. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2011 – Nadaljnje ukrepanje po Posebnem poročilu št.
48 The 24 months target set in OLAF’s AMP is realistic taking into consideration OLAF’s operational experience and the various factors influencing the course of investigations (such as OLAF’s dependence on cooperation from Member States or third countries). 
48 Cilj 24 mesecev, določen v letnem načrtu upravljanja urada OLAF, je uresničljiv, če upoštevamo operativne izkušnje urada OLAF in različne faktorje, ki vplivajo na potek preiskav (kot je odvisnost urada OLAF od sodelovanja z državami članicami in tretjimi državami).
However, one size does not fit all, and in recognition of these factors, OLAF is assessing the possibility of making a clear distinction between the duration targets for different types of case, whilst still retaining the average duration target of 24 months. 29–30. 
Ob upoštevanju teh faktorjev in ker vse ne odgovarja vsem, OLAF ocenjuje možnost jasnega razločevanja med cilji glede trajanja za različne vrste primerov, pri čemer pa bo cilj za povprečno trajanje preiskave ostalo 24 mesecev.
In addition to the 9-and 18-month reports, there is continuous supervision of duration by line management. 
Poleg 9-in 18-mesečnih poročil čas trajanja stalno spremlja tudi pristojno vodstvo.
On a monthly basis, statistics are produced for management drawing attention to longer cases. 
Vsak mesec so objavljene statistike, ki vodstvo opozorijo na dalj trajajoče primere.
These are regularly discussed at Directors’ meetings. 
O teh se redno razpravlja na srečanjih direktorjev.
Regarding the role of the Board, see reply to paragraph 21. 
Glede vloge odbora glej odgovor na odstavek 21.
The revised proposal to amend Regulation 1073/1999 will foresee reinforced controls of the duration of investigations, including informing the Supervisory Committee in a timely manner. 
Spremenjen predlog o spremembi Uredbe št. 1073/1999 bo predvideval poostrene kontrole trajanja preiskav, vključno s pravočasnim obveščanjem nadzornega odbora.
Even though the number of cases per investigator in Investigations and Operations Directorates may have decreased, the amount of incoming information needing to be evaluated has considerably increased, which has a significant impact on the overall workload of investigators. 
Čeprav se je število primerov na preisko-valca v direktoratih za preiskave in operacije morda zmanjšalo, se je količina vstopnih informacij, ki jih je treba ovrednotiti, precej povečala, kar ima velik vpliv na skupno količino dela preiskovalcev.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Due to OLAF’s policy to focus on the more serious cases, their duration tends to be in line with their increased complexity. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Ker je politika urada OLAF, da se osredotoča na resnejše primere, se njihovo trajanje ponavadi poveča zaradi njihove večje zapletenosti.
OLAF is fully committed to controlling the duration of cases through their efficient management. 
OLAF se odločno zavezuje, da bo z učinkovitim vodenjem primerov nadziral njihovo trajanje.
See also reply to paragraphs 29–30. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavka 29 in 30.
As already mentioned, the volume of incoming information has increased considerably and OLAF intends to put in place a procedure for a more efficient and accurate processing of the information during the evaluation period. 
Kot je že bilo omenjeno, se je količina vstopnih informacij znatno povečala. OLAF namerava uvesti postopek za učinkovitejšo in natančnejšo obdelavo informacij med obdobjem ocenjevanja.
This will include an upstream filtering and where necessary an analysis of information. 
Ta bo vključeval predhodno filtriranje in po potrebi tudi analizo informacij.
In many cases where initial information needs to be verified with external bodies, Member States and third country authorities, OLAF depends on its external partners to respond in a timely manner and relies upon their goodwill and cooperation. 
V mnogih primerih, kjer morajo informacije preveriti zunanji organi, organi držav članic in tretjih držav, je OLAF za pravočasen odziv odvisen od svojih zunanjih partnerjev in se zanaša na njihovo dobro voljo in sodelovanje.
Although OLAF is investing heavily in improving these relationships in order to reduce delays in communication of information, this remains a factor largely outside its control. 
Čeprav OLAF, da bi zmanjšal zamude pri sporočanju informacij, veliko vlaga v izboljšanje teh odnosov, je to v veliki meri še vedno faktor, nad katerim nima nadzora.
The two-and six-month guidelines for assessments have been set by OLAF itself for work monitoring purposes. 
Navodila za ocenjevanje po dveh in šestih mesecih je za spremljanje dela uvedel OLAF sam.
Moreover, the progressive application of the de minimis guidelines (as laid down in an annex to the OLAF Manual) should facilitate progress in reducing assessment duration in the medium to longer term. Special Report No 2/2011 — Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office 
Vendar bi moralo postopno uvajanje navodil de minimis (kot so določena v prilogi k priročniku OLAF) pripomoči k skrajšanju ocenjevanja na srednji in dolgi rok. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2011 – Nadaljnje ukrepanje po Posebnem poročilu št.
OLAF has made considerable progress in ensuring that data subjects are informed of its investigations, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. 
OLAF je bistveno napredoval pri zagotavljanju, da so posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo podatki, obveščeni o preiskavah v skladu z Uredbo (ES) 45/2001.
This was achieved in a transparent way following a plan agreed with the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS). 
To je bilo doseženo na pregleden način na podlagi načrta, s katerim se je evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov strinjal.
OLAF has completed a data protection backlog exercise covering specified groups of investigations that were opened prior to the existence of the data protection module, therefore the five outstanding cases have been dealt with accordingly. 
OLAF je odpravil zaostanke glede varstva podatkov posebnih skupin preiskav, ki so se začele pred uvedbo modula za varstvo podatkov, tako se je ustrezno obdelalo tudi teh pet primerov, ki so bili izjeme.
Although the EDPS was consulted on all the aspects referred to by the Court in the context of the prior checks on OLAF investigations and follow-up, OLAF is willing to consult the EDPS again on the specific issue raised. 37. 
Čeprav je bil evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov (ENVP) vprašan za mnenje glede vseh vidikov, ki jih je Sodišče navedlo v zvezi s predhodnimi preverjanji preiskav urada OLAF in nadaljnjih ukrepov, se je OLAF pripravljen ponovno posvetovati z ENVP o posebnih izpostavljenih vprašanjih.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION The Commission considers that, even under the existing legal framework, the rights of individuals concerned are protected and that an independent control of investigative acts exists, to which the case law of the Court of Justice has been increasingly contributing since the Court made its statement in 2005. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Komisija meni, da so tudi v obstoječem pravnem okviru pravice zadevnih posameznikov zaščitene in da se preiskovalna dejanja nadzirajo na neodvisen način, k čemur od izjave Sodišča Evropske unije leta 2005 vedno več prispeva tudi njegova sodna praksa.
Even though it considers that OLAF’s investigative actions (including the Final Case Reports) cannot be challenged for annulment4, the Court of Justice contributes to an independent control notably of these by means of possible actions for damages5. 
Čeprav meni, da se preiskovalnih dejavnosti urada OLAF (vključno s končnimi poročili) na da razveljaviti4, Sodišče k njihovemu neodvisnemu nadzoru prispeva z morebitnimi odškodninskimi tožbami5.
Evidence must be collected in a lawful manner in order to ensure that national administrative and judicial authorities can make use of it in their respective procedures. 
Zbiranje dokazov se mora izvajati na zakonit način, da se zagotovi, da jih lahko nacionalni upravni in sodni organi uporabijo v svojih postopkih.
The same is valid for administrative and recovery procedures to be initiated by the authorising officers. 
Enako velja za upravne postopke in postopke izterjave, ki jih morajo začeti odredbodajalci.
In addition to this, the OLAF Manual provides clear internal guidelines for investigators concerning the conducting of an investigation. 
Poleg tega priročnik urada OLAF navaja jasne notranje smernice za preiskovalce glede vodenja preiskav.
OLAF has no powers to force its partners to react in a timely manner and relies upon their goodwill and cooperation. 
OLAF ne more prisiliti partnerjev, da bi se pravočasno odzvali, in se zanaša na njihovo dobro voljo in sodelovanje.
Although OLAF is investing heavily in improving these relationships, this remains a factor largely outside its control. 
Čeprav OLAF veliko vlaga v izboljšanje odnosov z njimi, je to področje še vedno izven njegovega nadzora.
4 Refer to cases T-193/04 Tillack v. Commission dated 4 October 2006 and T-261/09P Violetti et Schmit dated 20 May 2010. 
4 GlejzadeveT-193/04TillackprotiKomisijizdne4.oktobra2006 in T-261/09P Violetti et Schmit z dne 20. maja 2010.
5 Refer to cases T-48/05 Franchet et Byk v. Commission dated 8 July 2008 and F-5/07 and 7/05 Violetti v. Commission dated 28 April 2009 and F-72/06 Verheyden v. Commission dated 28 April 2009. 
5 GlejzadeveT-48/05FranchetetBykprotiKomisijizdne8.julija 2008 ter F-5/07 in 7/05 Violetti proti Komisiji z dne 28. aprila 2009 ter F-72/06 Verheyden proti Komisiji z dne 28. aprila 2009. 37.
It is envisaged that the proposal for the reform of Regulation 1073/1999 will consolidate the rights of the individual concerned and make them more visible. Additionally, it will introduce an independent review mechanism/procedure for dealing with complaints by persons concerned by investigations, who consider that their procedural rights have not been respected by OLAF. 
Predvideva se, da bodo s predlogom spremembe Uredbe št. 1073/1999 pravice zadevnih posameznikov še bolj uveljavljene in vidne. Poleg tega se bo uvedel neodvisen mehanizem/postopek pregle-dovanja, ki bo obravnaval pritožbe oseb, na katere se nanašajo preiskave, ki menijo, da OLAF ni spoštoval njihovih procesnih pravic.
50 With regard to cooperation with Member States in the field of direct expenditure, steps towards solving this problem have already been taken by the Commission. 
50 Kar zadeva sodelovanje z državami članicami na področju neposrednih odhodkov, je Komisija že začela ukrepati.
In 2009, as part of the questionnaire for the 2008 Annual Commission Report on the protection of the EU’s financial interests - fight against fraud, most Member States communicated to OLAF the complete contact details of national authorities for all expenditure fields, including direct expenditure, thus enabling OLAF investigators to identify and contact the competent authority in good time of the check. 
Leta 2009 je v okviru vprašalnika za letno poročilo Komisije za leto 2008 o varovanju finančnih interesov Komisije – boj proti goljufijam, večina držav članic uradu OLAF sporočila popolne kontaktne podatke nacionalnih organov za vsa področja odhodkov, vključno z neposrednimi odhodki, s katerimi so lahko preiskovalci urada OLAF pravočasno našli pristojne organe in stopili v stik z njimi.
OLAF will remain in close contact with Member States for the continuous updating of this information. 
OLAF bo zaradi stalnega posodabljanja teh informacij še naprej v tesnem stiku z državami članicami.
In the 2009 report, the Commission strongly recommends all Member States to set up national and judicial authorities with competences for the field of direct expenditure, as the same level of protection of financial interests must be ensured for all areas of the EU budget. 
V poročilu za leto 2009 Komisija vsem državam članicam toplo priporoča, da vzpostavijo nacionalne sodne organe, ki bodo pristojni za področje neposrednih odhodkov, ker je treba za vsa področja proračuna EU zagotoviti enako stopnjo zaščite finančnih interesov.
It is envisaged that the reformed Regulation 1073/1999 addresses this issue by proposing an Anti-fraud Coordination Service (AFCOS) for each Member State. 
1073/1999 rešil s predlogom za ustanovitev nacionalne službe za usklajevanje boja proti goljufijam (AFCOS) v vsaki državi članici.
The Practical Agreement provides for a framework for the respective cooperation. 
Praktični sporazumi določajo okvir za vsako sodelovanje.
There is a common understanding between OLAF and Eurojust that, in order to ensure sound management, the text is not in practice interpreted in a literal way but cooperation is focused on complex and sensitive criminal cases, and where it brings added value. 
OLAF in Eurojust sta se sporazumela, da se za zagotovitev dobrega vodenja v praksi besedilo ne razlaga dobe-sedno, ampak se sodelovanje osredotoča na zapletene in občutljive kazenske zadeve ter na primere, v katerih prinese dodano vrednost.
This cooperation is handled by the OLAF-Eurojust liaison team which meets regularly. 
To sodelovanje ureja skupina za zveze OLAF-Eurojust, ki se redno srečuje.
Additionally, OLAF and Eurojust organise regular exchange visits to further improve understanding of their respective tasks. 
OLAF in Eurojust poleg tega organizirata redne obiske v okviru izmenjav, s katerimi se razumevanje nalog udeleženih še izboljšuje.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 44. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 44.
The Commission is paying close attention to the possibilities offered by the Lisbon Treaty in terms of the further development of Eurojust and the setting up of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). 
Komisija veliko pozornost posveča možnostim, ki jih je prinesla Lizbonska pogodba na področju nadaljnjega razvoja Eurojusta in ustanovitve Evropskega javnega tožilstva.
The Commission is planning to issue a Communication on the establishment of an EPPO from Eurojust and to further reflect on the cooperation with all actors involved, including OLAF. 
Komisija namerava izdati sporočilo o ustanovitvi Evropskega javnega tožilstva iz Eurojusta in nadalje razmisliti o sodelovanju z vsemi sodelujočimi, vključno z uradom OLAF.
OLAF is fully aware of this perspective and will further improve cooperation. 
Urad OLAF se tega popolnoma zaveda in si bo še naprej prizadeval za boljše sodelovanje.
It is envisaged that the reformed Regulation 1073/1999 will lay down rules for closer cooperation between Eurojust and OLAF. 
Predvideva se, da bo spremenjena Uredba št. 1073/1999 določila pravila za tesnejše sodelovanje med Eurojustom in uradom OLAF.
It will provide a legal basis for OLAF to conclude cooperation arrangements with both Europol and Eurojust. 
Zagotovila bo pravno podlago, na podlagi katere bo OLAF zaključil dogovore o sodelovanju tako z Europolom kot z Eurojustom.
An information exchange between OLAF and Eurojust will be reinforced in the new proposal. 
Z novim predlogom se bo izmenjava informacij med uradom OLAF in Eurojustom povečala.
See also reply to paragraph 43. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 43.
OLAF makes every possible effort to evaluate and quantify the financial impact of fraudulent activity. 
OLAF si po najboljših močeh prizadeva oceniti in izmeriti finančni vpliv goljufij.
Nevertheless, the amounts to be recovered are not always possible to quantify at the outset and therefore the potential financial impact cannot always be considered as a clear ‘objective’ for an investigation. 
Vendar zneskov, ki jih je treba izterjati, ni vedno mogoče izmeriti na začetku in zato potencialni finančni vpliv ne more biti vedno jasen cilj za preiskavo. Posebno poročilo št.
Special Report No 2/2011 — Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office 51 The effectiveness of OLAF investigations cannot be assessed simply in financial terms. 
1/2005 o upravljanju Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) 51 Učinkovitosti preiskav urada OLAF se s finančnega vidika ne da enostavno oceniti.
OLAF gathers evidence both against and in favour of persons concerned, so a conclusion that a person concerned does not have a case to answer is also to be considered a positive result. 
OLAF zbira dokaze tako v škodo kot v prid zadevnih oseb, zato je treba sklep, da proti določeni osebi ni potreben proces, šteti kot pozitiven rezultat.
Also, a case which has limited immediate financial impact may have substantial longer term financial implications once lessons learnt have been reflected in improved procedures. 
Prav tako ima primer, pri katerem je takojšnji finančni vpliv majhen, lahko večje dolgoročne finančne posledice, ko se pridobljene izkušnje uporabijo v izboljšanih postopkih.
Indeed, OLAF fulfils its role to optimise conditions for follow-up. 
OLAF res izpolnjuje svojo vlogo optimizi-ranja pogojev za nadaljnje ukrepe.
In many instances, without OLAF’s assistance, follow-up would not have been successful. 52. 
V veliko primerih brez pomoči urada OLAF nadaljnji ukrepi ne bi bili uspešni.
The Commission appreciates the idea of further improving OLAF’s reporting, allowing for reliable comparisons over time. 
Komisija ceni pripravljenost urada OLAF, da še izboljša svoja poročila, kar bo omogočilo zanesljive primerjave skozi čas.
The proposal will be carefully examined. 
Predlog se bo temeljito preučil.
However, difficult technical issues have to be taken into account and resolved, in particular with respect to time lags and quality of data. 
Vendar je treba upoštevati in rešiti težka tehnična vprašanja, zlasti v zvezi z zamudami in kakovostjo podatkov.
The Commission agrees with the findings of the Court. 
Komisija se strinja z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča.
It should also be noted that the relations between OLAF and the Supervisory Committee have become much more fruitful since the previous audit. 
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da so od zadnje revizije odnosi med uradom OLAF in nadzornim odborom precej napredovali.
The rights of individuals concerned are already protected in the existing legal framework. 
Pravice zadevnih posameznikov so v obstoječem pravnem okviru že zaščitene.
Any formal procedure on the part of OLAF or the Supervisory Committee for an intervention of the Supervisory Committee on this issue in ongoing individual cases could be seen as an interference with the investigative independence of the OLAF Director. 
Kakršen koli formalni postopek urada OLAF ali nadzornega odbora za posredovanje nadzornega odbora glede tega v posameznih primerih v obravnavi bi bil lahko sprejet kot ovira za preiskovalno neodvisnost direktorja urada OLAF.
As regards the question whether the Supervisory Committee has to be informed when OLAF transmits information to national judicial authorities in cases which are already dealt with by the national judicial authorities, no definitive answer to this question is to be found in Art. 11(7) of Regulation 1073/1999. 
Na vprašanje, ali mora biti nadzorni odbor obveščen, ko OLAF nacionalnim sodnim organom pošlje informacije v zvezi s primeri, ki so jih ti organi že obravnavali, v členu 11(7) Uredbe št.
The provision could be interpreted strictly, limited only to internal cases, or in a broader sense. 
Določbo bi se lahko razlagalo absolutno, kar pomeni omejitev na notranje primere, ali v širšem smislu.
OLAF is willing to apply an extensive interpretation, i.e. including external cases, as this would facilitate the monitoring work of the Supervisory Committee. 
Urad OLAF je pripravljen uporabiti širšo razlago, tj. da se vključijo zunanji primeri, ker bi to olajšalo dejavnosti spremljanja, ki jih izvaja nadzorni odbor.
Concerning already ongoing criminal cases at national level, OLAF considers it appropriate to inform the Committee of these cases if an external or internal investigation has been opened and investigative action taken by OLAF. 
Urad OLAF v zvezi s kazenskimi zadevami v obravnavi na nacionalni ravni meni, da je ustrezno o njih obveščati odbor, če je OLAF začel zunanjo ali notranjo preiskavo in preiskovalne dejavnosti.
OLAF has already adapted its practice according to this interpretation. 
Urad OLAF je svojo prakso že prilagodil tej razlagi.
With the Decision of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 15 February 2011, the mandate of the present Supervisory Committee Members will be extended until 30 November 2011. 
Z odločitvijo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z dne 15. februarja 2011 se bo mandat članov sedanjega nadzornega odbora podaljšal do 30. novembra 2011.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 67. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 67.
The Commission reiterates its opinion that OLAF should continue to contribute to the establishment of its anti-fraud policy and strategy. 
Komisija ponavlja svoje mnenje, da bi urad OLAF moral še naprej prispevati k vzpostavljanju njene politike in strategije za boj proti goljufijam.
Even though the figure of 37 % is generated from the TMS, it does not entirely reflect the real situation. 
Čeprav številka 37 % izhaja iz sistema upravljanja časa, ne kaže celotne realne slike.
See also reply to paragraph 11. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 11.
The Commission appreciates the Court’s findings that OLAF is making more use of its investigative powers. 
Komisija ceni ugotovitve sodišča, da urad OLAF več uporablja svoja preiskovalna pooblastila.
Concerning strategic intelligence, its main concern is to understand the patterns of fraud and to identify (sectoral and other) risks which support operational activities and fraud prevention. 
Njegova glavna skrb glede strateškega obveščanja je razumevanje vzorcev goljufij in ugotavljanje (sektorskih in drugih) tveganj, ki so povezana z operativnimi dejavnostmi in preprečevanjem goljufij.
Special Report No 2/2011 — Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office 53 In addition to the assistance OLAF’s strategic intelligence offers to Member States, OLAF contributes significantly to the anti-fraud policy of the Commission. 
1/2005 o upravljanju Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) 53 Urad OLAF poleg pomoči, ki jo s svojim strateškim obveščanjem zagotavlja državam članicam, zelo prispeva k politiki Komisije za boj proti goljufijam.
For example, OLAF has issued specific recommendations to several Commission services to improve fraud prevention following an analysis of its operational cases. 
OLAF je na primer po analizi svojih operativnih primerov za različne službe Komisije izdal posebna priporočila za izboljšanje preprečevanja goljufij.
Follow-up recommendation 1 This recommendation is partially accepted. 
Priporočilo za nadaljnje ukrepanje 1 To priporočilo je delno že sprejeto.
The speed of investigations is an area that could be further improved (see also replies to paragraphs 27–29). 
Hitrost preiskav je področje, ki se ga lahko nadalje izboljša (glej tudi odgovore na odstavke 27–29).
However, as OLAF is committed to dealing with the more serious cases and is progressively applying financial thresholds when deciding whether or not to open a case, increased time spent on investigations may not necessarily imply an increase in the number of investigations. 
Ker pa je urad OLAF zavezan obravnavanju resnejših primerov in postopoma uvaja minimalne finančne prage pri odločanju, ali naj se preiskava začne ali ne, več časa, porabljenega za preiskave, ne pomeni nujno večjega števila preiskav.