natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN C 344/270 Official Journal T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 56. 
SL C 344/270 Uradni list Evropske unije 12.11.2012 U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 56.
Basedonitsauditwork,theCourtfoundthatthe examined supervisory and control systems of EuropeAid were partially effective (see paragraphs 31 to 53). 
Sodišče je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela ugoto­ vilo, da so bili pregledani nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi Euro­ peAid delno uspešni (glej odstavke 31 do 53).
TheCourtconcludesthatthequalityofCRISdata remains a source of concern and affects both the accuracy of the data used for the preparation of the annual accounts (see paragraph 20) and the effectiveness of supervisory and control systems (see paragraphs 39, 40 and 43) (39). 
Sodišče ugotavlja, da kakovost podatkov v CRIS ostaja vir zaskrbljenosti in vpliva na točnost podatkov, uporabljenih za pripravo letnih računovodskih izkazov (glej odstavek 20), ter uspešnost nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov (glej odstavke 39, 40 in 43) (39).
Recommendations 58. 
Priporočila 58.
Annex 3 shows the result of the Court’s review of progress in addressing recommendations made in its 2009 Annual Report. 
VPrilogi3jeprikazanrezultatpregledanapredkapri obravnavanju priporočil iz letnega poročila Sodišča za leto 2009.
The following points should be noted: (a) EuropeAid has made significant progress in implementing many of the Court’s recommendations. 
Upoštevati bi bilo treba naslednje: (a) EuropeAid je dosegel velik napredek pri izvajanju mnogih priporočil Sodišča.
This is notably the case in relation to the development of the methodology for estimating the residual error rate, the dissemination of the financial management toolkit to improve the beneficiaries’ knowledge of eligibility rules, the planning and monitoring of audits and the assessment of eligibility for budget support; (b) further efforts are necessary to fully implement the Court’s recommendations concerning the quality of CRIS data, the follow-up of audit findings and recommendations and the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of the transactional ex-post control system. of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 56. 
To velja zlasti za razvoj metodologije za ocenjevanje stopnje preostalih napak, razširjanje sklopa orodij za finančno poslovodenje zaradi izboljšanja pozna­ vanja pravil o upravičenosti, načrtovanje in spremljanje revizij ter oceno upravičenosti za proračunsko podporo; (b) treba si je še naprej prizadevati, da se v celoti izvedejo priporočila Sodišča v zvezi s kakovostjo podatkov v CRIS, spremljanjem popravnih učinkov revizijskih ugoto­ vitev in priporočil ter oceno stroškovne učinkovitosti sistema naknadnih kontrol transakcij. O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 56.
The Commission has designed its controls to cover the full lifecycle of its multi-annual projects. 
Komisija je svoje kontrole zasnovala tako, da zajemajo celotni življenjski cikel njenih večletnih projektov.
It believes that these supervisory and control systems are effective and have significantly improved year on year, covering both the operation of the EDFs and activities financed by the EU budget. 
Meni, da so ti nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi uspešni ter se vsako leto znatno izboljšujejo, saj pokrivajo tako delo ERS kot dejavnosti, ki se financirajo iz proračuna EU.
Despite the challenges of a high risk external aid environment, the Court's most likely estimated annual error rate for external aid under the EU budget has been below materiality for 2010 and 2011, and was below materiality for the EDFs in 2009. 
Kljub izzivom zelo tveganega okolja zunanje pomoči je bila po oceni Sodišča najverjetnejša letna stopnja napak za zunanjo pomoč v okviru proračuna EU pod pragom pomembnosti za leti 2010 in 2011, za ERS pa pod pragom pomembnosti leta 2009.
The Commission shares the Court's concern to continue to improve the quality of data held in the external aid management information system (CRIS). 
Komisija se strinja s pomislekom Sodišča, da je treba še naprej izboljševati kakovost podatkov v CRIS.
However, as the Court states in paragraph 20, the encoding errors found have had no material impact on the annual accounts. 
Vendar, kot navaja Sodišče v odstavku 20, ugotovljene napake pri kodiranju niso pomembno vplivale na letne računovodske izkaze.
With particular reference to the provisions of the Financial Regulation applicable to the 10th European Development Fund (3) and in view of the proposed reduction of its available resources, the Commission will consider the cost and benefits of the Court's recom­ mendations before taking and/or proposing appropriate action. (a) The Commission's results for the estimation of EuropeAid's residual error rate i.e. the financial impact of errors remaining after all planned controls are completed) will be available in early 2013 for the 2012 reporting period. (b) EuropeAid will re-launch its efforts to improve CRIS data quality in 2012 and better link the financial findings of audits to the recovery of funds. 
S posebnim poudarkom na določbah finančne uredbe, ki se uporablja za 10. Evropski razvojni sklad (3) , in ob upoštevanju predlaganega zmanjšanja razpoložljivih virov bo Komisija preučila stroške in koristi priporočil Sodišča, preden bo sprejela in/ali pred­ lagala ustrezne ukrepe. (a) Rezultati ocene Komisije v zvezi s stopnjo preostalih napak Euro­ peAid, tj. finančni učinek napak, ki ostane po izvedbi vseh načr­ tovanih kontrol, bodo za obdobje poročanja 2012 na voljo v začetku leta 2013. (b) EuropeAid bo v letu 2012 ponovno okrepil prizadevanja za izboljšanje kakovosti podatkov v CRIS in boljšo povezavo finan­ čnih ugotovitev revizij z izterjavo sredstev.
The transactional ex-post system was suspended in 2012. _____________ (39) See also the Court’s Special Report No 5/2012 ‘The Common External Relations Information System (CRIS)’ (http://eca.europa.eu). _____________ (3) Articles 11-13. 
Sistem naknadnih pregledov transakcij je bil leta 2012 začasno prekinjen. _____________ (39) Glej tudi posebno poročilo Sodišča št.
Following this review and the findings and conclusions 59. for 2011, the Court recommends that EuropeAid: T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S (a) improve the management of contract awarding procedures, by setting out clear selection criteria and better docu­ menting the evaluation process (see paragraph 28(b)); (b) introduce documented risk-based planning and systematic follow-up for verification visits (see paragraph 40) and on-the-spot monitoring visits (see paragraph 45); (c) render compulsory the guidelines on risk analysis for the preparation of annual audit plans by delegations and EuropeAid’s headquarters (see paragraph 48); (d) review the design of KPIs to ensure that they are unambiguous and easy to interpret (see paragraph 39); (e) assess the IAC’s capacity to perform its task effectively (see paragraph 50). (a) The Commission will launch a process designed to learn the lessons of the errors detected by the Court in the contract awarding process and a revision of the Practical Guide to Contracts will be issued in 2013. (b) The Commission will consider whether the purpose and the specific objectives of EuropeAid's delegation verification missions need to be re-examined. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/271 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 59. Sodišče glede na ta pregled ter ugotovitve in zaključke 59. za leto 2011 priporoča, naj EuropeAid: (a) izboljša vodenje postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil z opredelitvijo jasnih meril za izbiro in boljšim dokumenti­ ranjem procesa vrednotenja (odstavek 28(b)); (b) uvede dokumentirano načrtovanje na podlagi tveganja in sistematično spremljanje za obiske zaradi preverjanja (glej odstavek 40) ter obiske za spremljanje na kraju samem (glej odstavek 45); (c) uvede obvezne smernice za analizo tveganja za pripravo letnih revizijskih načrtov za delegacije in osrednje službe EuropeAid (glej odstavek 48); (d) pregleda zasnovo ključnih kazalnikov uspešnosti, da se zagotovi, da bodo nedvoumni in lahki za razlago (glej odstavek 39); (e) oceni zmožnosti enote za notranjo revizijo za učinkovito opravljanje njenih nalog (glej odstavek 50).
EuropeAid will introduce a more formal assessment and annual planning process for both verification missions to delegations and on-the-spot monitoring of projects. 
EuropeAid bo uvedel bolj formalen proces ocenjevanja in letnega načrtovanja tako za obiske delegacij zaradi preverjanja kot za spremljanje projektov na kraju samem.
However the Commission considers that the current risk-based selection process may usefully be complemented by additional selection criteria. 
Vendar Komisija meni, da bi bilo koristno, če bi obstoječi proces izbire, ki temelji na tveganju, dopolnjevala dodatna merila za izbor.
See also reply to paragraph 40. (c) The Commission will consider making EuropeAid's audit planning risk analysis methodology compulsory for the 2013 period onwards. (d) The Commission is not able to undertake to review the EuropeAid's Key Performance Indicators in the short to medium term. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 40. (c) Komisija bo razmislila o tem, da bi bila metodologija EuropeAid za analizo tveganja pri načrtovanju revizij od leta 2013 obvezna. (d) Komisija v kratko-do srednjeročnem smislu ne more izvesti pregleda ključnih kazalnikov uspešnosti EuropeAid.
The KPIs were newly introduced (by a steering group representing a wide range of interests and stakeholders) for annual reporting on 2011 (in 2012) and the Commission does not yet have sufficient information or analysis of the dataset. 
Ključne kazalnike uspešnosti je leta 2012 na novo uvedla usmerjevalna skupina, ki zastopa širok razpon interesov in zainteresiranih strani, za namen poročanja za leto 2011, zato Komisija še nima zadostnih informacij ali analize podatkov.
However they may well require adjustment over time once the new reporting system is embedded. (e) The Commission will assess the capacity of EuropeAid's Internal Audit Unit (IAC) and consider a potential reinforcement if found to be necessary. 
Vendar jih bo treba verjetno sčasoma prilagoditi, ko bo novi sistem poročanja uveljavljen. (e) Komisija bo ocenila zmogljivost enote EuropeAid za notranjo revizijo in jo po potrebi okrepila.
Given the commitment to reduce its overall staff, EuropeAid will look in the first instance at possibilities for enhancing available expertise. 
EuropeAid bo v okviru svojega prizadevanja za zmanjšanje skupnega števila osebja v prvi vrsti poiskal možnosti za okrepitev razpoložljivega strokovnega znanja.
EN C 344/272 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 SIZE AND STRUCTURE OF THE SAMPLE Total commitments Total transactions (of which): 27 133 3 30 30 30 50 45 163 165 170 170 Advances Interim/Final payments 133 RESULTS OF TESTING (1) (2) Proportion (number) of transactions tested found to be: Free of error 65% Affected by one or more errors 35% (86) (47) 77 % (23) 23 % (7) 67% (109) 33% (54) 73 % 78% 76% 27% 22% 24% Analysis of transactions affected by error Analysis by type of error Non-quantifiable errors: 38% (18) 100 % (7) 46% (25) 49% 65% 61% Quantifiable errors: 62% Eligibility 52% Occurrence 38% Accuracy 10% (29) (15) (11) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 54% (29) 52% (15) 38% (11) 10% (3) 51% 35% 39% 70% 23% 44% 17% 23% 38% 13% 54% 19% ESTIMATED IMPACT OF QUANTIFIABLE ERRORS Most likely error rate 5,1 % Upper error limit (UEL) Lower error limit (LEL) 8,1 % 2,0 % (1) To improve insight into areas with different risk profiles within the policy group, the sample was split up into segments. 
SL C 344/272 Uradni list Evropske unije 12.11.2012 VELIKOST IN STRUKTURA VZORCA Obveznosti skupaj Plačila skupaj (od tega): 27 133 0 133 3 30 0 30 30 30 50 45 163 165 170 170 0 0 0 40 163 165 170 130 predplačila vmesna/končna plačila REZULTATI PREIZKUŠANJA (1) (2) Delež preizkušenih plačil, za katera je bilo ugotovljeno: da v njih ni napak 65% (86) 77 % (47) 23 % (23) (7) 67% (109) 73% 78% 76% 33% (54) 27% 22% 24% da je nanje vplivala vsaj ena napaka 35% Analiza plačil, na katera so vplivale napake Analiza po vrstah napak količinsko neopredeljive napake 38% količinsko opredeljive napake 62% (18) 100 % (7) 46% (25) 49% 65% 61% 54% (29) 51% 35% 39% upravičenost 52% nastanek 38% točnost 10% (29) 0% (15) 0% (11) 0% (0) (0) (0) (0) 52% (15) 70% 23% 44% 38% (11) 17% 23% 38% 10% (3) 13% 54% 19% OCENJENI UČINEK KOLIČINSKO OPREDELJIVIH NAPAK Najverjetnejša stopnja napake 5,1 % zgornja meja napake spodnja meja napake 8,1 % 2,0 % (1) Vzorec je bil razdeljen v segmente zaradi boljšega uvida v področja z različnimi profili tveganja v tej skupini politik.
Projects 2011 Budget support Total 2010 2009 2008 ANNEX 1 RESULTS OF TRANSACTION TESTING FOR THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 40 (3) 0% (0) 30 163 165 170 130 
Projekti 2011 Proračunska podpora Skupaj 2010 2009 2008 (3) 0% PRILOGA 1 REZULTATI PREIZKUŠANJA TRANSAKCIJ ZA EVROPSKE RAZVOJNE SKLADE
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/273 ANNEX 2 RESULTS OF EXAMINATION OF SYSTEMS FOR THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUNDS AND DEVELOPMENT AID UNDER THE GENERAL BUDGET Assessment of the systems examined System concerned Ex-ante controls Monitoring and supervision External audits Internal audits Overall assessment Central systems EuropeAid Partially effective Effective Effective Partially effective Partially effective Delegations Partially effective Partially effective Partially effective N/A Partially effective 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/273 PRILOGA 2 REZULTATI PREGLEDA SISTEMOV ZA EVROPSKE RAZVOJNE SKLADE IN RAZVOJNO POMOČ V OKVIRU SPLOŠNEGA PRORAČUNA Ocena pregledanih sistemov Sistem Predhodne kontrole Spremljanje in nadzor Zunanje revizije Notranje revizije Skupna ocena Osrednji sistemi EuropeAid delno uspešno uspešno uspešno delno uspešno delno uspešno Delegacije delno uspešno delno uspešno delno uspešno NR delno uspešno
EN C 344/274 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 Year Court recommendation Court's analysis of the progress made Commission reply 2009 EuropeAid should, in the context of its planned review of its overall control strategy, develop a key indicator for the estimated financial impact of residual errors after all ex-ante and ex-post controls have been implemented, based for example in an examination of a representative statistical sample of closed projects (2009 Annual Report, paragraph 54(a)). 
SL C 344/274 Uradni list Evropske unije 12.11.2012 Leto Priporočilo Sodišča EuropeAid bi moral v okviru načrtovanega pregleda svoje 2009 skupne kontrolne strategije razviti ključni kazalnik ocenjenega finančnega učinka stopnje preostalih napak po izvedbi vseh predhodnih in naknadnih kontrol, na primer na podlagi pregleda reprezentativnega statističnega vzorca zaključenih projektov (letno poročilo za leto 2009, odstavek 54(a)).
EuropeAid has adopted a methodology to estimate the residual error rate and contracted an external audit firm to perform this work. 
EuropeAid je sprejel metodologijo za oceno stopnje preostalih napak in sklenil pogodbo z zunanjo revizijsko družbo za izvedbo te ocene.
The results of the first exercise should be available to be taken in consideration in EuropeAid's 2012 AAR. The implementation of this recommendation is ongoing. 
Rezultati prve ocene bi morali biti na voljo dovolj zgodaj, da bodo upoštevani pri pripravi letnega poročila o dejavnostih EuropeAid za leto 2012. To priporočilo se še vedno izvaja.
The Commission's work is on track in relation to the establishment of the residual error rate for the EuropeAid portfolio. 
Delo Komisije v zvezi z določitvijo stopnje preostalih napak za portfelj EuropeAid napreduje po načrtih.
EuropeAid should, in the context of this review, assess the cost-effectiveness of the various controls, notably of the trans­ actional ex-post control system (2009 Annual Report, paragraph 54(b)). 
EuropeAid bi moral v okviru tega pregleda oceniti stroškovno učinkovitost različnih kontrol, zlasti sistema naknadnih kontrol transakcij (letno poročilo za leto 2009, odstavek 54(b)).
In its replies to the 2010 Annual Report, the Commission has stated that it had started work on the cost effectiveness of controls in 2010. 
Komisija je v odgovorih na letno poročilo za leto 2010 navedla, da so leta 2010 stekla dela v zvezi s stroškovno učinkovitostjo kontrol.
This work was to be reviewed and relaunched in 2011/2012 in the context of the final outcome of the current revision of the Financial Regulation. 
To delo naj bi v letih 2011/2012 pregledala in nadaljevala glede na končni rezultat potekajoče revizije finančne uredbe.
Limited progress was made in 2011. 
Leta 2011 je bil dosežen skromen napredek.
The implementation of this recommendation is ongoing. 
To priporočilo se še vedno izvaja.
Progress was indeed made in 2011 in relation to the costs and benefits of controls as set out in the Annual Activity Report 2011 which details the costs of many internal controls (e.g. audits, training, ex post controls) and reports on new and innovative ways of measuring benefits such as key performance indicators lifted from CRIS data and pre and post training tests. 
Leta 2011 je dejansko bil dosežen napredek v zvezi z oceno stroškov in koristi kontrol, kot je bilo predvideno v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2011, ki natančno opredeljuje stroške številnih notranjih kontrol (npr. revizij, usposabljanja, naknadnih kontrol) ter navaja nove in inovativne načine za merjenje njihovih koristi, kot so ključni kazalniki uspešnosti na podlagi podatkov v CRIS ter preizkusi znanja pred usposabljanjem in po njem.
Cost benefit analysis has for example led to the suspension of ex-post transactional controls in 2012. 
Analiza stroškov in koristi je na primer povzročila začasno prekinitev naknadnih kontrol transakcij v letu 2012.
EuropeAid should finalise and disseminate the financial management toolkit targeting the high inherent risk of errors at the level of implementing organisations, contractors and beneficiaries to ensure adequate knowledge of financial management and eligibility rules (2009 Annual Report, paragraph 54(c)). 
EuropeAid bi moral končati in razširjati Sklop orodij za finančno poslovodenje, namenjen ugotavljanju tveganja napak pri delovanju na ravni izvajalskih organizacij, izvajalcev in upravičencev, da bi zagotovil ustrezno poznavanje pravil za finančno poslovodenje in upravičenost (letno poročilo za leto 2009, odstavek 54(c)).
The Financial Toolkit was finalised and disseminated in early 2011. 
Sklop orodij je bil pripravljen in objavljen na začetku leta 2011.
The Commission believes that this recommendation has been fully implemented. 
Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo v celoti uresničeno.
EuropeAid should continue its efforts to ensure that the Delegations record data in CRIS Audit in a comprehensive and timely manner (2009 Annual Report, paragraph 54(d)). 
EuropeAid bi moral nadaljevati svoja prizadevanja za zagoto­ vitev, da delegacije evidentirajo podatke v CRIS Audit celovito in pravočasno (letno poročilo za leto 2009, odstavek 54(d)).
EuropeAid has stated its intention to relaunch its efforts in 2012. 
EuropeAid je izjavil, da namerava leta 2012 obnoviti svoja prizadevanja.
EuropeAid will relaunch its efforts to improve CRIS data quality in 2012. 
EuropeAid bo v letu 2012 ponovno okrepil prizadevanja za izbolj­ šanje kakovosti podatkov v CRIS.
ANNEX 3 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUNDS 
PRILOGA 3 SPREMLJANJE IZVAJANJA PREJŠNJIH PRIPOROČIL ZA EVROPSKE RAZVOJNE SKLADE Analiza doseženega napredka, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče Odgovor Komisije
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/275 Year Court recommendation Court's analysis of the progress made Commission reply 2009 EuropeAid should ensure that the specific conditions for performance-based variable tranches clearly specify the indi­ cators, targets, calculation methods and verification sources (2009 Annual Report, paragraph 55(a)). This recommendation has been fully implemented. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/275 Leto Priporočilo Sodišča Zasnovo CRIS Audit bi bilo treba spremeniti tako, da bi zago­ Analiza doseženega napredka, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče Kot je navedeno v odgovoru Komisije na letno poročilo Odgovor Komisije 2009 EuropeAid bi moral zagotoviti, da bodo v posebnih pogojih za spremenljive tranše, ki temeljijo na uspešnosti, jasno določeni kazalniki, cilji, metode izračuna in viri za preverjanje (letno poročilo za leto 2009, odstavek 55(a)).
The design of CRIS Audit should be modified to provide information on the amounts of final ineligible expenditure and financial corrections done after the audit clearance process with the auditee has been completed (2009 Annual Report, paragraph 54(e)). 
To priporočilo je v celoti uresničeno. tavljala informacije o zneskih končnih neupravičenih odhodkov in finančnih popravkov, izvedenih po koncu procesa revizijskega razčiščevanja z revidirancem (letno poro­ čilo za leto 2009, odstavek 54(e)).
As indicated in the Commission’s reply to the Court’s 2010 Annual Report, the audit and recovery modules of the CRIS information system were linked in 2011. This is a significant improvement but does not provide yet complete information on the results and follow-up of audits. 
Sodišča za leto 2010, sta bila modula o revizijah in izterjavah v informacijskem sistemu CRIS leta 2011 povezana, kar je velika izboljšava, vendar še ne zagotavlja popolnih informacij o rezultatih in spremljanju popravnih učinkov revizij.
The audit module of the external aid management information system (CRIS) was designed to plan, and record the results of external audits rather than track audit follow-up made by the Commission. 
Revizijski modul CRIS je bil oblikovan za načrtovanje zunanjih revizij in beleženje njihovih rezultatov in ne za sledenje nadaljnjega spremljanja revizij, ki ga izvaja Komisija.
However the Commission would like to be able to develop this functionality in the medium term, resources permitting. 
Vendar želi Komisija to funkcijo v srednjeročnem smislu razviti, če bodo to dovoljevali razpo­ ložljivi viri.
EuropeAid should ensure that Delegations’ reports provide a structured and formalised demonstration of public finance management progress by clearly setting the criteria against which progress was to be assessed (i.e. the results that the recipient government had to achieve during the period concerned), the progress made and the reasons why the reform programme may have not been implemented according to plan (2009 Annual Report, paragraph 55(b)). 
EuropeAid bi moral zagotoviti, da bodo poročila delegacij vsebovala strukturiran in formaliziran prikaz napredka pri upravljanju javnih financ tako, da bodo v njih jasno navedeni merila za oceno napredka (tj. rezultatov, ki jih je morala država prejemnica doseči v zadevnem obdobju), dosežen napredek in razlogi, zakaj program reforme morda ni bil izveden po načrtu (letno poročilo za leto 2009, odstavek 55(b)).
The quality of the assessment of the PFM general eligibility criterion has improved since the introduction of the new reporting format for the Delegation’s PFM Annual Monitoring Reports in 2010. However, the Court still detected cases in 2011 where this assessment was not sufficiently structured and formalised, as the PFM achievements were not compared with the objectives/targets set for the reference period. 
Kakovost ocene splošnega pogoja za upravičenost v zvezi z upravljanjem javnih financ se je po uvedbi novega formata za poročila delegacij o letnem spremljanju upravljanja javnih financ leta 2010 izboljšala, vendar je Sodišče za leto 2011 še vedno našlo primere, v katerih ta ocena ni bila dovolj strukturirana in formalizirana, saj dosežki pri upravljanju javnih financ niso bili primerjani s cilji/ožjimi cilji za refe­ renčno obdobje.
Nevertheless efforts will continue for the improvement of the budget support performance framework, notably in the revision of Budget Support Guidelines due to be issued in 2012. 
Kljub temu si bo še naprej prizadevala za izboljšanje okvira uspešnosti proračunske podpore, zlasti s popravljeno različico smernic za proračunsko podporo, ki naj bi bila izdana v letu 2012.