natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission is however of the opinion that the majority of the agricultural land under SAPS is used for production and the beneficiaries with limited activities represent only a small percentage of the total SAPS area. 
Vendar Komisija meni, da se večina kmetijskega zemljišča v okviru SEPP uporablja za proizvodnjo in upravičenci z omejenimi dejavnostmi predstavljajo le majhen odstotek celotnega področja, kjer se uporablja SEPP.
See also the Commission reply to paragraph 20. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na točko 20.
This issue has been addressed in the Commission legislative proposals on the CAP towards 2020 by proposing the definition of an active farmer. 
43 Okvir 1 Komisija to vprašanje dodatno obravnava v zakonodajnih predlogih o SKP do leta 2020 z zagotovitvijo opredelitve aktivnega kmeta.
When discussing further targeting of direct support during the Health Check, the Council considered that flexibility should be given to Member States to consider, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and according to their specific economic realities, which are the right parameters to be taken into account for the application of this possibility (to exclude from direct payments ‘natural or legal persons whose agricultural activities form only an insignificant part of their overall economic activities or whose principal business or company objects do not consist of exercising an agricultural activity’). 
Svet je v razpravah o nadaljnjem usmerjanju neposredne podpore med pregledom stanja menil, da bi bilo treba državam članicam v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti in glede na njihove specifične gospodarske razmere omogočiti prožnost pri presoji, katere parametre bodo upoštevale pri uporabi te možnosti (da iz neposrednih plačil izključijo „fizične ali pravne osebe, katerih kmetijske dejavnosti predstavljajo le majhen delež vseh gospodarskih dejavnosti ali katerih glavna dejavnost ali dejavnost družbe ni opravljanje kmetijske dejavnosti“).
This is further addressed in the Commission legislative proposals on the CAP towards 2020 through the definition of an active farmer. 
To je dodatno obravnavano v zakonodajnih predlogih Komisije o SKP do leta 2020 z opredelitvijo aktivnega kmeta.
Utilised agricultural area shall mean total area taken by arable land, permanent grassland, permanent crops and kitchen gardens as established by the Commission for its statistical purposes. 
Komisija je za statistične namene določila, da kmetijsko zemljišče v uporabi pomeni skupno površino njiv, trajnega travinja, trajnih nasadov in vrtov.
Following this definition, if agricultural land is no longer farmed for any (economic, social) reason, it shall be included within the category ‘other land’ as not eligible for SAPS. 
V skladu s to opredelitvijo bo kmetijsko zemljišče, na katerem se kmetijske dejavnosti zaradi različnih razlogov (gospodarskih, socialnih) ne izvajajo, kot neupravičeno do SEPP vključeno v kategorijo „drugo zemljišče“.
It is the MS responsibility to assess whether the characteristics of the land do not prevent an agricultural use. 
Naloga držav članic je, da ocenijo, ali značilnosti zemljišča ne preprečujejo kmetijske uporabe.
For Bulgaria and Romania the historical reference to the land which was in ‘good agricultural condition’ was dropped due to the specific structure of agricultural sectors before the accession. 
V primeru Bolgarije in Romunije je bila pretekla referenca za zemljišče, ki je bilo v „dobrem kmetijskem stanju“, opuščena zaradi specifične strukture kmetijskih sektorjev pred pristopom.
Due to various reasons (frag-mented parcels, unclear ownership and lack of capital), large areas of agricultural land were still not cultivated at the date of accession. 
Velike površine kmetijskih zemljišč zaradi različnih razlogov (razdrobljene parcele, nejasnosti v zvezi z lastništvom in pomanjkanje kapitala) na dan pristopa še vedno niso bile obdelane.
Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 44 Common reply to paragraphs 30–32 New Member States used the best available information at the time of establishing their land parcel identification systems (LPIS). 
16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah 44 Skupni odgovor na točke 30–32 Nove države članice so pri vzpostavljanju svojega identifikacijskega sistema za zemljišča (LPIS) uporabile najboljše takrat razpoložljive informacije.
The Commission audits carried out in 2004 concluded that the LPIS systems were generally operational in Slovakia, Poland and Hungary. 
Komisija je v svojih revizijah, izvedenih leta 2004, ugotovila, da so bili sistemi LPIS na splošno usposobljeni za delovanje na Slovaškem, Poljskem in Madžarskem.
The information on eligible agricultural areas recorded in the LPIS was not always fully accurate but with the audit missions and Action Plans in Bulgaria and Romania the Commission supported the new MS in their effort to improve the quality of the information in their land parcel identification systems. 
Informacije o upravičenih kmetijskih površinah, evidentirane v LPIS, niso bile vedno v celoti točne, vendar je Komisija z revizijskimi misijami in akcijskimi načrti v Bolgariji in Romuniji podprla novi državi članici v prizadevanjih za izboljšanje kakovosti informacij v njunih identifikacijskih sistemih za zemljišča.
The agricultural area for SAPS as approved by the Commission is the one the new MS have estimated (using objective criteria) before the accession as the potential eligible area that will be claimed. 
Komisija je za SEPP odobrila tisto kmetijsko površino, ki so jo nove države članice pred pristopom ocenile (z objektivnimi merili) kot morebitno upravičeno do vložitve zahtevka.
In LPIS, the total agricultural area is recorded; however, not all this area is finally claimed by the farmers (due to various reasons, e.g. process of land restitution, fragmented parcels, access to the land, etc.). 
V LPIS je evidentirana celotna kmetijska površina, vendar na koncu kmetje niso vložili zahtevkov za celotno površino (zaradi različnih razlogov, kot so postopek vračanja zemljišč, razdrobljene parcele, dostop do zemljišča itd.).
Therefore, the area approved by the Commission may be lower than the total agricultural area recorded in the LPIS. 
Zato je lahko površina, ki jo je odobrila Komisija, manjša od celotne kmetijske površine, evidentirane v LPIS.
The difference between agricultural area under SAPS as established in Annex VIII of Regulation (EC) 1121/2009 and the maximum eligible area for SAPS recorded in the LPIS can be explained. 
Za razliko med kmetijsko površino v okviru SEPP, kot je navedena v Prilogi VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 1121/2009, in največjo površino, ki je v LPIS evidentirana kot upravičena za SEPP, obstaja obrazložitev.
Therefore, the Commission did not consider it necessary to request the MS to analyse this discrepancy. 
Zato je Komisija menila, da od držav članic ni treba zahtevati analize tega odstopanja.
See also reply to paragraph 33. 
Glej tudi odgovor na točko 33.
Common reply to (a) and (b) The concept of application of a reduction coefficient is a standard mechanism to avoid that the budgetary ceilings are exceeded. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavka (a) in (b) Pojem uporabe količnika znižanja je standarden mehanizem za preprečevanje prekoračitev zgornjih mej proračuna.
There is no uncertainty since Member States can communicate to the farmers well in advance the maximum amount of SAPS payment per hectare they will be entitled to (= the division of the budgetary allocation available and the agricultural area under SAPS as established in Annex VIII of Regulation (EC) 1121/2009) as well as the estimated possible reduction on the basis of the data from aid applications. 
Ker lahko države članice kmete precej vnaprej obvestijo o največjem znesku plačila iz SEPP na hektar, do katerega bodo upravičeni (razdelitev razpoložljivih proračunskih dodelitev in kmetijska površina v okviru SEPP, kot je navedena v Prilogi VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 1121/2009), ter prav tako o ocenjenem možnem zmanjšanju na podlagi podatkov v zahtevkih za pomoč, ni pri tem nobene negotovosti.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 38. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 38.
Each request for the revision of utilised agricultural area has been analysed by the Commission taking into account the existence of objective criteria (e.g. size of agricultural holdings, experience from aid applications over the previous years, update of LPIS system, etc.). 
Komisija je analizirala vsak zahtevek za pregled kmetijskega zemljišča v uporabi, pri čemer je upoštevala obstoj objektivnih meril (npr. velikost kmetijskih gospodarstev, izkušnje z zahtevki za pomoč v prejšnjih letih, posodobitev sistema LPIS itd.).
Long-term experience from aid applications is considered as one of the objective criteria. 
Za enega od objektivnih meril se štejejo dolgoročne izkušnje z zahtevki za pomoč.
In 2005 the Slovak Republic authorities requested amendment of utilised agricultural area (UAA) on the basis of aid application for SAPS in 2004 only (one year data). 
Organi Slovaške republike so leta 2005 zahtevali spremembo kmetijskega zemljišča v uporabi (KZU) le na podlagi zahtevka za pomoč iz SEPP leta 2004 (podatki enega leta).
The Commission did not find the request sufficiently justified due to the specific situation in the Slovak Republic in that period (disputes of land ownership) and limited experience with SAPS. 
Komisija je menila, da zahtevek zaradi specifičnega položaja v Slovaški republiki v tem obdobju (spori v zvezi z lastništvom zemljišč) in omejenih izkušenj s SEPP ni zadostno utemeljen.
However, in November 2008 the Slovak Republic resubmitted the request to adjust utilised agricultural area on the basis of already four years experience with SAPS aid applications, which was accepted by the Commission. 
Vendar je Slovaška republika novembra 2008, tokrat na podlagi štiriletnih izkušenj z zahtevki za pomoč iz SEPP, ponovno predložila zahtevek za prilagoditev kmetijskega zemljišča v uporabi, ki ga je Komisija sprejela.
Abandoned land is one of the reasons for ineligibility of land. 
Eden od razlogov, da je zemljišče neupravičeno do pomoči, je njegova opuščenost.
The Commission audits find regularly ineligible land in the land parcel identification systems and deficiencies found are followed up in the context of the clearance of accounts. 
Komisija v svojih revizijah redno ugotavlja, da so v identifikacijskih sistemih za zemljišča neupravičena zemljišča, ugotovljene nepravilnosti pa so obravnavane v okviru potrditve obračunov.
Deficiencies found during audits are followed up in the context of the clearance of accounts. Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
Nepravilnosti, ugotovljene v revizijah, so obravnavane v smislu potrditve obračunov. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
Commission audits in Hungary have confirmed that the quality of the LPIS has improved over the past years. 
Revizije Komisije na Madžarskem so potrdile, da se je kakovost LPIS v zadnjih letih izboljšala.
For Romania, the Commission decided in 2012, on the basis of its audits carried out in 2011, to lift its reservation concerning IACS on the grounds that the Romanian action plan was completed, properly implemented and the system was operational of sufficient quality for claim year 2011. 
Komisija se je leta 2012 na podlagi svojih revizij iz leta 2011 odločila, da za Romunijo umakne pridržek v zvezi z integriranim administrativnim in kontrolnim sistemom (IAKS), kar temelji na dejstvu, da je bil romunski akcijski načrt zaključen in pravilno izveden ter da je bilo delovanje sistema za leto zahtevka 2011 dovolj kakovostno.
An audit of the implementation of the revised IACS system will be carried out as part of the normal audit programme in 2012. 
Revizija izvrševanja revidiranega sistema IAKS bo izvedena kot del običajnega revizijskega programa za leto 2012.
For Bulgaria, a detailed IACS action plan was developed and was completed in November 2011 as planned. 
Za Bolgarijo je bil razvit natančen akcijski načrt IAKS, ki je bil zaključen novembra 2011, kot je bilo načrtovano.
However, while audits carried out (end of 2011, beginning of 2012) considered the work done to be appropriate, the Commission had not yet sufficient assurance that the application of the new elements in the handling of the 2012 claims would work properly. 
V opravljenih revizijah (konec leta 2011 in v začetku leta 2012) je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo opravljeno delo ustrezno, vendar Komisija še ni imela zadostne zagotovitve, da bo uporaba novih elementov v obravnavi zahtevkov leta 2012 delovala pravilno.
As a consequence, the reservation was not lifted.8 42. 
Zato pridržek ni bil umaknjen8. 42.
Any deficiencies found are followed up in the context of the clearance of accounts. 
Vse ugotovljene nepravilnosti so obravnavane v okviru potrditve obračunov.
There may be specific cases in which eligibility of land for direct payments is not so obvious. 
Lahko obstajajo posebni primeri, ko je upravičenost zemljišča do neposrednih plačil manj očitna.
To address this issue, the Commission prepared a questionnaire and a discussion paper which reflected the exchange of views with MS. The discussion paper (DS/2010/04 rev1) concluded (from the questionnaires and the discussion) that the eligibility of areas is ‘undoubtful in the vast majority of cases and the assessment is without problem for neither controllers nor farmers’. 
Komisija je za obravnavo tega vprašanja pripravila vprašalnik in dokument za razpravo, ki sta odražala izmenjavo mnenj z državami članicami. V dokumentu za razpravo (DS/2010/04 rev1) je bilo ugotovljeno (iz vprašalnikov in razprave), da je upravičenost površine „v večini primerov nedvomna in ocena ni problematična ne za nadzornike ne za kmete“.
8 AAR 2011 - http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/synthesis/aar/doc/agri_aar_2011.pdf - page 75. 
8 AAR (Letno poročilo o dejavnostih) 2011 – http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/ synthesis/aar/doc/agri_aar_2011.pdf – stran 75.
The increase per AWU, besides higher prices and public support, came also from a reduction in the work force during the period. 
Povišanje na letno delovno enoto je poleg višjih cen in javne podpore tudi posledica zmanjšanja delovne sile v zadevnem obdobju.
To fully describe the situation, also market revenues should be taken into account in assessing the role of SAPS payments. 
Za celoten opis položaja je treba pri ocenjevanju vloge plačil iz SEPP upoštevati tudi tržne prihodke.
In 2004, when SAPS was introduced, net value added increased in the EU-10, but also in the EU-15. 
Leta 2004, ko je bila uvedena SEPP, se je čista dodana vrednost v EU-10 povečala, prav tako tudi v EU-15.
Later net value added varied without a clear link to SAPS implementation. 
Pozneje se je spreminjala brez jasne povezanosti z izvajanjem SEPP.
SAPS has been designed as an area aid without a need to declare farmers income. 
SEPP je bila zasnovana kot pomoč na površino, za katero ni treba navesti prihodkov kmetov.
The financial amount corresponds to the eligible hectares. 
Finančna vsota je v skladu z upravičenimi hektari.
In addition, new Member States can target specific groups of farmers/sectors via CNDPs (and specific support). 
Poleg tega lahko nove države članice posebnim skupinam kmetov/sektorjev namenijo dopolnilna nacionalna neposredna plačila (in posebno podporo).
The income situation of small farmers is addressed in the legislative proposals on the CAP towards 2020. 
Dohodkovno stanje malih kmetov je obravnavano v zakonodajnih predlogih o SKP do leta 2020.
The Commission’s legislative proposals on the CAP towards 2020 include an element of progressive reduction and capping of the direct payments which will allow a limitation of the payments made to farmers. 
Zakonodajni predlogi Komisije o SKP do leta 2020 vključujejo element postopnega zmanjšanja in omejitev neposrednih plačil, s čimer se bodo plačila kmetom lahko omejila.
In a decoupled support system set up to encourage farmers towards more market orientation to adjust the support level to e.g. income level of the farmers would be detrimental to the objective. 
V sistemu nevezane podpore za spodbujanje kmetov v bolj tržno usmerjenost bi prilagoditev ravni podpore, npr. stopnji njihovega prihodka, škodila namenu.
Also as income level is closely linked to production level and type, World Trade Organisation (WTO) ‘green box’ rules would certainly not be met. 
To bi vsekakor pomenilo tudi neupoštevanje pravil „zelene škatle“ Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), saj je stopnja prihodka tesno povezana z ravnjo in vrsto proizvodnje.
However, The Commission acknowledges that distribution of support between farmers needs to be more targeted and it is therefore a core issue of the Commissions’ legislative proposals for the CAP towards 2020, pointing for instance young farmers, small farmers, areas with natural constraints, etc. REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 51. 
Vendar Komisija priznava, da je treba razdelitev podpore med kmete bolj ciljno usmeriti in zato je to vprašanje ključno v zakonodajnih predlogih Komisije o SKP do leta 2020, s poudarkom, na primer, na mladih kmetih, malih kmetih, območjih z naravnimi omejitvami itd. ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 51.
There is a highly heterogeneous picture in the EU-12. 
Položaj v EU-12 je zelo heterogen.
Since SAPS is an area payment, it follows that farms that are large in terms of hectares receive higher payments which are not necessarily accompanied with high production. 
Ker je SEPP plačilo na površino, to pomeni, da kmetije z več hektari prejmejo višja plačila, ki pa jih ne spremlja nujno velika proizvodnja.
The redistributive effect is apparent even under SPS where9 decoupled aids are granted to 82 % of beneficiaries receiving less than 10 000 euro but represent only 24 % of the total value of payments. 
Učinek prerazporeditve je jasen tudi v okviru SEP, v kateri9 so nevezane pomoči dodeljene 82 % upravičencev, ki prejmejo manj kot 10 000 EUR, vendar predstavljajo le 24 % skupne vrednosti plačil.
Often the 0,2 % includes large cooperatives composed of many smaller farms. 
Pogosto so v 0,2 % vključene velike zadruge, ki jih sestavlja veliko manjših kmetij.
It was agreed by the Council that the concept of modulation (progressive reduction of direct payments) is applicable for new MS only when the level of direct payments is at least equal to that level in other Member States. 
Svet se je strinjal, da se koncept modulacije (postopno zmanjšanje neposrednih plačil) za nove države članice uporabi le, ko je raven neposrednih plačil vsaj enakovredna tisti v drugih državah članicah.
The issue of appropriate distribution pattern of aid among holdings of different sizes is addressed in the Commission’s legislative proposals on the CAP towards 2020 through progressive reduction and capping of the payment and specific scheme for small farmers. 
Vprašanje ustreznega vzorca razporeditve pomoči med gospodarstva različnih velikosti je obravnavano v zakonodajnih predlogih Komisije o SKP do leta 2020 s postopnim zmanjšanjem in omejitvijo plačil ter posebno shemo za male kmete.
In order to preserve the simplicity of the scheme, SAPS does not allow regionalisation of the scheme. 
Da bi bila SEPP še naprej enostavna shema, ne omogoča regionalizacije sheme.
However, new Member States are allowed to grant CNDPs on sectoral bases as a compensation for phasing-in. 
Vendar lahko nove države članice postopno uvajanje kompenzirajo z dodelitvijo dopolnilnih nacionalnih neposrednih plačil na sektorskih ravneh.
This tool together with the support under Article 131 (specific support) allows for addressing specific needs of the farmers in sensitive sectors (e.g. animal producers without agricultural areas). 
To orodje, skupaj s podporo v skladu s členom 131 (posebna podpora), omogoča obravnavo posebnih potreb kmetov v občutljivih sektorjih (npr. živinorejci brez kmetijskih površin).
In addition to SAPS, support under the rural development programmes exists to target farmers in disadvantaged areas (LFA payments). 
Poleg SEPP obstaja v okviru programov za razvoj podeželja podpora, namenjena kmetom v prikrajšanih območjih (plačila za območja z omejenimi možnostmi).
SAPS is a decoupled scheme, and hence there is no production requirement. 
SEPP je nevezana shema in zato ne pomeni nobenih zahtev glede proizvodnje.
However, any farmer receiving support must perform an agricultural activity which means that he should at least maintain his land in GAEC. 
Vendar mora vsak kmet, ki prejema podporo, izvajati kmetijsko dejavnost, kar pomeni, da mora svoja zemljišča obdelovati vsaj v skladu z GAEC.
Even if the land is only kept in GAEC, SAPS contributes to the protection of natural resources thus providing the basis for the delivery of public goods through agriculture. 
Četudi je zemljišče obdelovano zgolj v skladu z GAEC, SEPP prispeva k zaščiti naravnih virov, s čimer določa podlago za zagotavljanje javnih dobrin s kmetijstvom.
It is irrelevant to introduce agricultural production as a criterion since it would be against the decoupled nature of the payments and it would not be compatible with the WTO ‘green box’ conditions. 
Uvedba kmetijske proizvodnje kot merila ni relevantna, saj bi bila v nasprotju z nevezanim značajem plačil in nezdružljiva s pogoji „zelene škatle“ STO.
The issue was addressed in the Health-Check by introducing Article 28(2) of Regulation 73/2009. 
To vprašanje je bilo obravnavano v pregledu stanja z uvedbo člena 28(2) Uredbe št. 73/2009.
By this, MS may exclude beneficiaries whose agricultural activities form only an insignificant part of their overall economic activities or who do not exercise any agricultural activity at all. 
V skladu s tem lahko države članice izključijo upravičence, katerih kmetijske dejavnosti predstavljajo le majhen delež vseh gospodarskih dejavnosti ali ki ne izvajajo nobene kmetijske dejavnosti.
This tool together with the support under Article 131 (specific support) allows addressing specific needs of the farmers in sensitive sectors (e.g. animal producers without agricultural areas). 
To orodje, skupaj s podporo v skladu s členom 131 (posebna podpora), omogoča obravnavo posebnih potreb kmetov v občutljivih sektorjih (npr. živinorejci brez kmetijskih površin).
The DG Agriculture and Rural Development Evaluation Plan foresees that Article 68 measures will be evaluated in 2013/2014. 
V načrtu ovrednotenja GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja je predvideno, da bodo ukrepi v členu 68 ovrednoteni leta 2013/2014.
This will give the Commission a full set of implementing data, including the report to be provided by the Member States by 1 October 2012, and allow to address the modifications introduced by the Member States on 1 August 2011. 
S tem bo Komisija pridobila celoten nabor podatkov o izvajanju, vključno s poročilom, ki ga morajo zagotoviti države članice do 1. oktobra 2012, in bo lahko obravnavala spremembe, ki so jih države članice uvedle 1. avgusta 2011.
The Commission reminds that Article 68 also allows Member States to use part of their SAPS envelope to grant specific support by implementing eight other categories of measures. REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 57. 
Komisija opozarja, da člen 68 z uvedbo osmih drugih kategorij ukrepov državam članicam tudi omogoča, da del finančnega okvira za SEPP porabijo za dodelitev posebne podpore.
The CAP instruments are continuously analysed by the Commission, in particular via evaluations of policy tools. 
Komisija nenehno analizira instrumente SKP, zlasti prek vrednotenj orodij politike.
As far as the direct payments are concerned, evaluation of the different impacts has been divided by issue. 
Pri neposrednih plačilih je vrednotenje različnih učinkov razdeljeno po vprašanjih.