natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It has gone beyond regulatory requirements intended by the legislator, in particular with the establishment of ‘core indicators’. 
Presegel je regulativne zahteve, ki jih je določil zakonodajalec, zlasti z uvedbo „osnovnih kazalnikov“.
However, DG REGIO is fully aware of those weaknesses and has been working to improve reporting on the recommended core indicators through working collaboratively with the Member States. 
Vendar se GD REGIO v celoti zaveda teh slabosti in si v sodelovanju z državami članicami prizadeva za izbolj­ šanje poročanja o priporočenih splošnih kazalnikih.
Adjustments will be introduced in the future legal bases. 
Prilagoditve bodo uvedene v prihodnjih pravnih podlagah.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 217 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S The Commission devoted a lot of efforts, in cooperation with the Member States, to fine-tune the quality and reliability of the information provided under this framework. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 217 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Komisija si je v sodelovanju z državami članicami prizadevala za podrobno določitev kakovosti in zanesljivosti informacij iz tega okvira.
The mid-term evaluation of rural development programmes suggests that difficulties persist in quantifying the impact indicators for several programmes. 
V vmesnem vrednotenju programov razvoja podeželja je omenjeno, da v več programih ostajajo težave pri količinskem opredeljevanju učinka kazalnikov.
Further work on these is ongoing, in close cooperation with Member States, both in relation to the current programming period, and in preparation for the future. 
V zvezi s tem potekajo nadaljnja prizadevanja v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami tako v povezavi s tekočim program­ skim obdobjem kakor tudi s pripravami za prihodnost.
Within this framework, the responsibility for the provision of reliable monitoring data relies on the Member States, in line with the repar­ tition of competences under shared management. 
Glede na navedeno so za zagotavljanje zanesljivih podatkov o sprem­ ljanju odgovorne države članice v skladu s porazdelitvijo pristojnosti na podlagi deljenega upravljanja.
Considering the high number of projects and the broad range of Member States' project specificities, it is neither feasible nor cost effective for the Commission to verify at project level data provided by the Member States. 
Glede na veliko število projektov in širok obseg specifičnosti projektov držav članic ni niti izvedljivo niti stroškovno učinkovito, da bi Komisija na ravni projekta preverjala podatke, ki jih predložijo države članice.
When choosing the topics for Special Reports, the Court considers the materiality of the audited area, the risks to sound financial management, previous coverage of related topics by the Court and other evaluations, and the relevance of the subject, i.e. the extent to which the audit results will help improve the effectiveness, efficiency and/or economy of EU expenditure. 
Pri izbiranju tem za pripravo poseb­ nega poročila upošteva pomembnost revidiranega področja, tveganja za dobro finančno poslovodenje, svoje predhodno obravnavanje povezanih tem in druga vrednotenja ter pomembnost teme, se pravi, koliko bodo rezultati revizije pripomogli k izboljšanju uspešnosti, učinkovitosti in/ali gospo­ darnosti odhodkov EU.
8.31. TheSpecialReportsadoptedbytheCourtin2010are presented as following: Special Reports adopted by the Court of Auditors in 2010 (22) — No 1/2010 ‘Are simplified customs procedures for imports effectively controlled?’ — No2/2010‘TheeffectivenessoftheDesignStudiesand Construction of New Infrastructures support schemes under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research’ — No 3/2010 ‘Impact Assessments in the EU institutions: do they support decision-making?’ _____________ (22) The Special Reports are available on the Court’s website at the following address: http://eca.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/ publications/auditreportsandopinions/specialreports 
8.31 Posebna poročila, ki jih je leta 2010 sprejelo Sodišče, so: Posebna poročila, ki jih je Sodišče sprejelo leta 2010 (22) — št. 1/2010 – Ali se poenostavljeni carinski postopki za uvoz uspešno kontrolirajo? — št. 2/2010 – Uspešnost podpornih shem za načrtovalne študije in izgradnjo novih infrastruktur v okviru šestega okvirnega programa za raziskave — št.3/2010 – Ocene učinka v institucijah EU: ali pomagajo pri odločanju? _____________ (22) Posebna poročila so na voljo na spletni strani Sodišča na naslovu: http://eca.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/ publications/auditreportsandopinions/specialreports
EN 218 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S — No 4/2010 ‘Is the design and management of the mobility scheme of the Leonardo da Vinci programme likely to lead to effective results?’ — No5/2010‘ImplementationoftheLeaderapproachfor rural development’ — No 6/2010 ‘Has the reform of the sugar market achieved its main objectives?’ — No 7/2010 ‘Audit of the clearance of accounts procedure’ — No 8/2010 ‘Improving transport performance on trans-European rail axes: Have EU rail infrastructure investments been effective?’ — No 9/2010 ‘Is EU Structural Measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect?’ — No 10/2010 ‘Specific measures for agriculture in favour of the outermost regions of the Union and the smaller Aegean islands’ — No 11/2010 ‘The Commission's management of General Budget Support in ACP, Latin American and Asian Countries’ — No 12/2010 ‘EU Development Assistance for Basic Education in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia’ — No13/2010‘IsthenewEuropeanNeighbourhoodand Partnership Instrument successfully launched and achieving results in the Southern Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia)’ — No 14/2010 ‘The Commission’s management of the system of veterinary checks for meat imports following the 2004 hygiene legislation reforms’ 8.32. 
8/2010 – Izboljševanje prevozne zmogljivosti na vseevropskih železniških oseh: ali so bile investicije EU v železniško infrastrukturo uspešne? — št. 9/2010 – Ali so sredstva EU iz strukturnih ukrepov za oskrbo z vodo za gospodinjsko uporabo porabljena učinkovito? — št. 10/2010 – Posebni ukrepi za kmetijstvo v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in na manjših egejskih otokih — št.11/2010 – Kako je Komisija upravljala splošno proračunsko podporo v državah AKP ter latinskoameriških in azijskih državah — št.12/2010 – Razvojna pomoč EU za osnovno izobraževanje v podsaharski Afriki in južni Aziji — št.13/2010 – Ali se je novi evropski instrument sosedstva in partnerstva na Južnem Kavkazu (Armenija, Azerbajdžan, Gruzija) začel uspešno izvajati in ali prinaša rezultate? — št.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 219 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Court’s observations concerning the process of producing results Strategic planning 8.33. In a number of its Special Reports (SRs) (23), the Court highlighted the principles which govern good planning: initiatives should be set in a strategic context and prioritised; specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed (SMART) objectives should be established, and consistently articulated in the various planning documents; good ex-ante impact assessment can play an important role in the decision-making process. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 219 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A Opažanja Sodišča o procesu doseganja rezultatov Strateško načrtovanje 8.33 Sodišče je v več posebnih poročilih (23) poudarilo načela, na katerih temelji dobro načrtovanje: pobude je treba določiti v strateškem kontekstu in jih prednostno razvrstiti, treba je določiti specifične, merljive, dosegljive, ustrezne in časovno opredeljene cilje (cilje SMART) in jih dosledno navajati v različnih načrtovalnih dokumentih, dobra predhodna ocena učinka pa lahko ima pomembno vlogo pri odločanju.
In its report on the Leonardo da Vinci mobility scheme, the Court found that the Commission had not finalised the setting up of SMART objectives and impact indicators to evaluate the success of the programme against its objectives and as a result the Commission had not been in a position to measure how the objectives were being met 3 years into the programme (SR No 4/2010, paragraphs 48, 50, 61 and 62). 
V svojem poročilu o programu mobilnosti Leonardo da Vinci je Sodišče ugotovilo, da Komisija ni dokončala oblikovanja ciljev SMART in kazalnikov učinka za vrednotenje uspeha programa glede na njegove cilje in zato ni mogla izmeriti, kako so bili cilji programa doseženi po treh letih njegovega izvajanja (Posebno poročilo št.4/2010, odstavki 48, 50, 61 in 62).
8.35. TheCourtreported,however,improvementsinthe definition of objectives in the area of budget support to developing countries (SR No 11/2010, paragraphs 56 and 96), and an instance of good practice in the area of ‘better regulation’ where impact assessments had effectively supported decision-making in the EU (SR No 3/2010, paragraph 87). 
8.35 Vendar je Sodišče poročalo tudi o izboljšanjih pri opredeljevanju ciljev na področju proračunske podpore državam v razvoju (Posebno poročilo št. 11/2010, odstavka 56 in 96) in o primeru dobre prakse na področju „boljše zakonodaje“, kjer so ocene učinka učinkovito podpirale odlo­ čanje v EU (Posebno poročilo št.
(24) SR No 8/2010, paragraph 63; SR No 9/2010, paragraph 72; SR No 13/2010, paragraph 70; SR No 5/2010, paragraph 48. 
(24) Posebna poročila št. 8/2010, odstavek 63; št.
With regard to the Leonardo da Vinci mobility scheme, the Lifelong Learning Programme Committee adopted the indicators in its meeting of 17 June 2010. 
8.34 V zvezi s programom mobilnosti Leonardo da Vinci je odbor za program vseživljenjskega učenja na svoji seji dne 17. junija 2010 sprejel kazalnike.
The Commission will provide a first report on these indicators to the Committee in the course of 2011. 
Komisija bo odboru predložila prvo poročilo o teh kazalnikih v letu 2011.
As regards the Leader approach, the Commission agrees that the objectives of the individual local development strategies should be established in line with SMART criteria to the extent possible. 
V zvezi s pristopom Leader se Komisija strinja, da bi bilo treba oblikovati cilje za posamezne strategije lokalnega razvoja, ki bi bili čim bolj skladni z merilom SMART.
In order to help local action groups in this task, rural development funding supports through the sub-measure ‘acquiring skills’, both assistance and training activities. 
Za pomoč lokalnim akcijskim skupinam pri tej nalogi financiranje razvoja podeželja s podukrepom „pridobivanje veščin“ podpira tako dejavnosti pomoči kot tudi usposa­ bljanja.
The Commission welcomes the recognition of the improvements made in the definition of budget support objectives. 
8.35 Komisija z zadovoljstvom sprejema priznavanje izboljšav pri opredeljevanju ciljev proračunske podpore.
The EDFs' Annual Report also confirms the significant progress made by the Commission in demonstrating compliance with the eligibility criteria set by the Cotonou Agreement and in introducing formal assessment frameworks for public finance management performance. 
Letno poročilo ERS potrjuje tudi pomemben napredek Komisije pri dokazovanju skladnosti z merili upravičenosti, določenimi v Sporazumu iz Cotonouja, in pri uvajanju formalnih ocenjevalnih okvirov za delovno uspešnost vodenja javnih financ.
Strategic planning in capacity development is reliant on a clear demand from the partner country and government leadership. 
Strateško načrtovanje pri razvoju zmogljivosti temelji na jasnem interesu partnerske države in vodstva vlade.
Lessons learnt in this area show that, without this ownership, external institutional support is unlikely to be used as the foundation for effective capacity development. 
Pridobljeno znanje in izkušnje na tem področju kažejo, da se brez tega interesa zunanja institucionalna podpora verjetno ne bo uporabila kot temelj za učin­ kovit razvoj zmogljivosti.
220 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 8.37. Thus the Court observed that the definition of Priority Projects for the trans-European rail axes should reflect present and anticipated needs (SR No 8/2010, paragraph 63). 
220 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 8.37 Takojenavedlo,dabimoralaopredelitevprednostnih projektov za vseevropske železniške osi upoštevati sedanje in predvidene potrebe (Posebno poročilo št.8/2010, odstavek 63).
8.38. Italsopointedoutthatagoodanalysisofneeds avoids fixing objectives which go beyond what is really required, while, at the same time, encourages alternative, less costly solutions (SR No 9/2010, paragraph 72). 
8.38 Prav tako je poudarilo, da se z dobro analizo potreb prepreči določanje ciljev, ki presegajo okvire resnično potreb­ nega, hkrati pa spodbuja alternativne cenejše rešitve (Posebno poročilo št.
Link between objectives and measures 8.39. In a number of its reports (25) the Court highlighted that the link must be clear between the objectives pursued and the measures chosen to reach those objectives. 
Povezava med cilji in ukrepi 8.39 Sodišče je v več svojih poročilih (25) poudarilo, da mora biti jasno, kakšna je povezava med zastavljenimi cilji in ukrepi, izbranimi za njihovo doseganje.
8.40. Whenthislinkisnotspecified,itisunlikelythatthe design of the measures selected will be capable of achieving the objectives pursued (see SR No 10/2010, paragraph 34, concerning the specific case of the smaller Aegean islands). 
8.40 Če ta povezava ni jasno določena, ni verjetno, da bodo izbrani ukrepi zasnovani tako, da bodo lahko dosegli oprede­ ljene cilje (glej Posebno poročilo št. 10/2010, odstavek 34, v zvezi s posebnim primerom manjših egejskih otokov).
In the area of ‘better regulation’, the Court observed that the impact assessment reports did not provide a standardised pres­ entation of how the objectives and expected outcomes of the proposed intervention could be achieved with the intended delivery mechanisms, and with regard to expenditure programmes, the estimated budget (SR No 3/2010, paragraph 60). 
Na področju „boljše zakonodaje“ je Sodišče opazilo, da poročila o oceni učinkov ne vsebujejo standardizirane predstavitve, kako je mogoče cilje in pričakovane izide predlagane interven­ cije doseči z načrtovanimi mehanizmi uresničevanja, pri programih odhodkov pa s predvidenim proračunom (Posebno poročilo št. 3/2010, odstavek 60).
Relevant, sufficient and proportionate means 8.41. Some observations of the Court(26) underline the importance of an adequate selection of means to obtain set objectives. 
Relevantna, zadostna in sorazmerna sredstva 8.41 Sodišče v nekaterih svojih opažanjih(26) poudarja pomembnost izbire ustreznih sredstev za doseganje oprede­ ljenih ciljev.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 8.37. With regard to the definition of Priority Projects for the trans-European rail axes, experience has shown that arriving at a definitive description of the main trans-European rail axes, while correct as an aspiration, is particularly difficult as they are in a constant state of flux depending on migration, trade patterns and the geopolitical context. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 8.37 V zvezi z opredelitvijo prednostnih projektov za vseevropske železniške osi so izkušnje pokazale, da je doseganje dokončnega opisa glavnih vseevropskih železniških osi kljub temu, da je to utemeljena težnja, zelo težko, saj se glede na preseljevanje, trgovinske tokove in geopolitični kontekst stalno spreminjajo.
Studies to analyse existing and expected traffic flows have been carried out, both for individual projects and for the network and have yet to lead to conclusive results. 
Tako za posamezne projekte kot tudi za mreže so bile izvedene študije za analizo obstoječih in pričakovanih prometnih tokov, vendar dokončnih rezultatov še ni.
As a result, such a definition is not currently possible and Priority Projects should continue to be based on political agreements between the Council and the European Parliament based on the best available evidence. _____________ (25) SR No 10/2010, paragraph 34; SR 3/2010, paragraph 60; SR No 6/2010, paragraphs 94 and 96. 
Zato takšna opredelitev trenutno ni mogoča, pri čemer bi morali prednostni projekti na podlagi najboljših dostopnih dokazov še naprej temeljiti na političnih sporazumih med Svetom in Evropskim parla­ mentom. _____________ (25) Posebna poročila št. 10/2010, odstavek 34; št. 3/2010, odstavek 60; št.
(26) SR No 12/2010, paragraph 66; SR No 7/2010, paragraph 90; SR No 9/2010, paragraph 53. EN 8.40. 
7/2010, odstavek 90; št. 9/2010, odstavek 53.
The Commission agrees that the support programme for the smaller Aegean islands could be improved and is working in coop­ eration with the Greek authorities to this end. 
SL 8.40 Komisija se strinja, da bi se lahko podporni program za manjše egejske otoke izboljšal, in v zvezi s tem sodeluje z grškimi organi.
10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 221 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 8.42. In the area of development assistance for basic education in sub-Saharan Africa the Court pointed to the difficulty that the Commission has experienced in assigning staff with the appropriate profiles to the delegations, which weakens their ability to manage the programmes effectively (SR No 12/2010, paragraph 66). 
10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 221 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 8.42 Na področju razvojne pomoči za osnovno izobraže­ vanje v podsaharski Afriki je Sodišče opozorilo na težave, ki jih ima Komisija z dodeljevanjem uslužbencev z ustreznimi profili delegacijam, kar slabi njihove zmogljivosti za uspešno upravljanje programov (Posebno poročilo št.12/2010, odstavek 66).
In the different context of the clearance of accounts procedure, the Court signalled that the corrections imposed, to be really effective, should have directly preventative or dissuasive consequences on those responsible for the irregularity (SR No 7/2010, paragraph 90). 
Na drugem področju, v okviru postopka potrje­ vanja obračunov, je Sodišče navedlo, da bi morali imeti nalo­ ženi popravki, če naj bodo resnično učinkoviti, neposredne preventivne ali odvračilne posledice za tiste, ki so odgovorni za nepravilnosti (Posebno poročilo št. 7/2010, odstavek 90).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 8.42. The Commission acknowledges that adequate qualified expertise in the field of education is essential. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 8.42 Komisija se strinja, da so zadostno kvalificirano strokovno znanje in izkušnje na področju izobraževanja bistveni.
When education is a priority for a delegation, the Commission takes steps to ensure that adequate expertise is available, for example by delegating under the EU division of labour policy responsibility to a Member State which has relevant sectoral expertise, or by providing appropriate expertise from Headquarters through the geographical directorates with the support of thematic units. 
Ko je izobra­ ževanje prednostna naloga delegacije, Komisija z ukrepi zagotovi razpoložljivost zadostnega strokovnega znanja in izkušenj, na primer z dodelitvijo odgovornosti državi članici, ki ima ustrezno področno strokovno znanje, v okviru delitve politike zaposlovanja EU ali z zagotavljanjem primernega strokovnega znanja in izkušenj sedeža prek geografskih direktoratov s podporo tematskih enot.
It is also planned that thematic networks will be developed to better link expertise in the thematic and geographical directorates in Headquarters with Delegations. 
Prav tako se načrtuje, da bodo razvite tematske mreže za boljše povezovanje strokovnega znanja in izkušenj tematskih in geografskih direktoratov sedeža z delegacijami.
The conformity clearance is designed to exclude from EU financing expenditure which does not comply with EU rules. 
S potrditvijo skladnosti se iz financiranja EU izključijo odhodki, ki niso skladni s pravili EU.
It is not a mechanism by which irregular payments to beneficiaries are recovered, which according to the principle of shared management is the sole responsibility of Member States. 
To ni mehanizem za izterjavo nepravilnih plačil upravičencem, ki je glede na načelo deljenega upravljanja izključno v pristojnosti držav članic.
Where undue payments to beneficiaries can be identified as a result of the conformity clearance, Member States are required to follow them up with recovery actions against these beneficiaries. 
Kadar so lahko neupravičena plačila upravičencem ugotovljena na podlagi potrditve skladnosti, morajo države članice ukrepati z uvedbo postopkov izterjave proti tem upravičencem.
Where recoveries are not needed because the financial correction relates to deficiencies in a Member State's management and control systems, the corrections are an important means to improve those systems and thus to prevent or detect and recover irregular payments to beneficiaries. 
Če izterjave od upravi­ čencev niso potrebne, ker je finančni popravek povezan s pomanj­ kljivostmi sistemov upravljanja in kontrole države članice, so ti popravki pomemben način za izboljšanje teh sistemov in s tem za preprečevanje ali odkrivanje in izterjavo nepravilnih plačil upravi­ čencem.
Moreover, agricultural legislation provides for effective, dissuasive and proportional sanctions to be imposed on beneficiaries who have received irregular payments. 
Poleg tega kmetijska zakonodaja določa izrekanje učinkovitih, odvra­ čilnih in sorazmernih kazni za upravičence, ki so prejeli nepravilna plačila.
The Commission has repeatedly emphasised the importance of project planning by national and regional authorities in the context of Cohesion Fund projects and major projects under the Structural Funds. 
8.44 Komisija je večkrat poudarila pomembnost načrtovanja projektov s strani nacionalnih in regionalnih organov v okviru projektov Kohezijskega sklada in velikih projektov iz strukturnih skladov.
In the context of the 2007-2013 structural funds programming period the technical assistance facility JASPERS has been established specifically to support, mainly in the EU 12, better project design and planning. 
V okviru programskega obdobja strukturnih skladov 2007–2013 je bil oblikovan instrument za tehnično pomoč JASPERS, namenjen izrecno za podporo boljšega oblikovanja in načrtovanja projektov, zlasti v državah EU 12.
However, planning is just one element affecting overspending and delays. 
Vendar je načrtovanje le eden od elementov, ki vplivajo na previsoko porabo in zamude.
As the Court also concluded in paragraph 45 of its Special Report on EU rail infrastructure investment that, ‘In nearly all cases, these [cost] escalations arose for reasons linked to unforeseeable factors that came to light during the construction phase, such as unexpectedly difficult geographical conditions, environmental protection requirements, safety requirements and higher than expected bids from contractors’. Budget and time frame 8.43. 
Kot je Sodišče ugotovilo tudi v odstavku 45 svojega posebnega poročila o investiciji EU v železniško infrastrukturo, je „v skoraj vseh primerih [...] do tega povišanja [stroškov] prišlo zaradi nepredvidljivih dejavnikov, ki so se pokazali v fazi gradnje, kot na primer nepričakovano težki geografski pogoji, okoljevarstvene in varnostne zahteve ter ponudbe izvajalcev, ki so bile dražje od priča­ kovanih“.
The Court pointed out in its reports(27) the importance of planning during the implementation phase of projects, to avoid overspending or delays. 8.44. 
Proračunski in časovni okvir 8.43 Sodišče je v svojih poročilih (27) opozorilo na pomembnost načrtovanja v izvedbeni fazi projektov, da se preprečijo previsoka poraba ali zamude.
Inthisrespect,theCourtobservedthat,regardingEU rail infrastructure investment, projects with less thorough and detailed preparation faced a higher risk of experiencing more significant cost escalations (SR No 8/2010, paragraph 46). 
8.44 GledetegajeprinaložbahEUvželezniškoinfrastruk­ turo opazilo, da je bilo za manj temeljito in podrobno pripra­ vljene projekte značilno večje tveganje, da bo prišlo do bistve­ nega povečanja stroškov (Posebno poročilo št.8/2010, odstavek 46).