natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court recognises the benefit of these Commission proposals, some of which, if implemented, would help to remedy certain weaknesses identified by this audit such as the need for better targeting the EU aid, the inclusion of the programme in a broader social policy, the enlargement of the variety of products to be distributed and the need for improving management and administrative systems, especially tendering procedures. 
Sodišče priznava koristi teh predlogov Komisije, od katerih bi nekateri, če bi se izvajali, pomagali odpraviti nekatere slabosti, ugotovljene med to revizijo, kot so potreba po boljšem usmerjanju pomoči EU, vključitev tega programa v širšo socialno politiko, povečanje raznovrstnosti proizvodov za razdeljevanje in potreba po izboljšanju upravljalnih in upravnih sistemov, zlasti javnih razpisov.
However, the Court emphasises that the reform of most of the markets under the CAP and the declining level of the intervention stocks in recent years imply that there is a need to reflect on the opportunity of continuing to finance this measure through CAP expenditure39. 
Vendar Sodišče poudarja, da reforma večine trgov v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in upadanje intervencijskih zalog v zadnjih letih pomenita, da je treba preučiti možnosti za nadaljnje financiranje tega ukrepa prek odhodkov skupne kmetijske politike39.
38 Proposal for a Council Regulation COM(2008) 563/3. 
38 Predlog za Uredbo Sveta COM(2008) 563/3.
39 CAP rules and especially those for the market support measures imply certain difficulties already identified by the Commission like multiannual planning, which is hardly compatible with EAGF financing, and the impossibility of transferring non-used appropriations to the following years. 31 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
39 Pravila skupne kmetijske politike in zlasti pravila za podporne tržne ukrepe povzročajo nekatere težave, ki jih je Komisija že opredelila, na primer večletno načrtovanje, ki je težko združljivo s financiranjem EKJS, in dejstvo, da neporabljenih odobrenih sredstev ni mogoče prenesti v naslednja leta. 31 Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
In this respect the Court also wishes to draw attention to the fact that the programme as implemented does not ‘give’ any right of the deprived persons to EU aid. 
Sodišče želi v zvezi s tem tudi opozoriti, da program, kot se izvaja, ogroženim osebam ne „daje“ nobene pravice do pomoči EU.
This is not in line with the support provided traditionally by the CAP to the agricultural community. 
To ni v skladu s podporo, ki jo je skupna kmetijska politika tradicionalno zagotavljala kmečki skupnosti.
Furthermore, the fact that market purchases would make no distinction between domestic and imported products further weakens the effect of the programme in terms of market intervention, as a measure directly supporting the purchase of imported products is not in line with the objectives of the CAP. 
Poleg tega dejstvo, da nakupi na trgu ne bi razlikovali med domačimi in uvoženimi proizvodi, dodatno slabi učinek programa v smislu tržne intervencije, saj ukrep, ki neposredno podpira nakup uvoženih proizvodov, ni v skladu s cilji skupne kmetijske politike.
Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 33 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME REMAIN VALID AND IS THE APPROACH APPROPRIATE? 
6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod 33 ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA ALI SO CILJI PROGRAMA ŠE VEDNO VELJAVNI IN ALI JE PRISTOP USTREZEN?
THE PREDOMINANTLY SOCIAL OBJECTIVE REMAINS VALID, ALTHOUGH THE LINK WITH INTERVENTION STOCKS AND CONSEQUENTLY WITH AGRICULTURAL EXPENDITURE HAS BECOME TENUOUS, ... 
SOCIALNI CILJ, KI PREVLADUJE, OSTAJA VELJAVEN, ČEPRAV JE POSTALA POVEZAVA Z INTERVENCIJSKIMI ZALOGAMI IN POSLEDIČNO S KMETIJSKIMI ODHODKI OHLAPNEJŠA, ...
Food aid for deprived persons was first introduced in 1987 as a reaction to conditions faced by deprived persons during a particularly harsh winter. 
Pomoč v hrani za ogrožene osebe je bila prvič uvedena leta 1987 kot odgovor na razmere, s katerimi so se soočale ogrožene osebe v posebno hudi zimi.
Although it had the twin objectives of making a ‘significant’ contribution to the well-being of the most deprived citizens and the stabilisation of agricultural markets through the disposal of part of the substantial intervention stocks, its primary objective was considered to be a social measure. 
Čeprav je imela dvojni cilj, tj. „bistveno“ prispevati k blaginji najbolj ogroženih državljanov in stabilizaciji kmetijskih trgov z odstranitvijo dela precejšnjih intervencijskih zalog, je bil njen primarni cilj socialni ukrep.
This was acknowledged in the evaluation of the measure published by the Commission in 1998. 
To je bilo priznano v oceni tega ukrepa, ki jo je Komisija objavila leta 1998.
The measure was considered appropriate for implementation ‘on a durable basis until the stocks have been run down to a normal level’. 
Ukrep se je štel kot ustrezen za dolgotrajno izvajanje, dokler se zaloge ne znižajo na običajno raven.
The budgetary authorities consider that there is still a need for the aid as a social measure. 
Proračunska organa menita, da še vedno obstaja potreba po pomoči kot socialnem ukrepu.
In effect, it is estimated that some 16 % of the population of the Union accounting for some 80 million citizens fall into the definition of deprived persons used by the Commission. 
Dejansko se ocenjuje, da približno 16 % prebivalstva Unije, kar pomeni približno 80 milijonov državljanov, ustreza opredelitvi ogroženih oseb, ki jo uporablja Komisija.
A European Parliament declaration in 2006 called for maintaining and increasing the aid as part of the efforts to reduce poverty. 
V deklaraciji Evropskega parlamenta iz leta 2006 je bila podana zahteva za ohranitev in povečanje pomoči v okviru prizadevanj za zmanjšanje revščine.
The Commission’s reform proposal of September 2008 intends to improve the implementation and sound financial management of the programme and contains elements, which, if implemented, will remedy certain weaknesses identified by this report. 
Predlog Komisije za reformo iz septembra 2008, katerega cilj je izboljšanje izvajanja in dobro finančno upravljanje programa, vsebuje elemente, ki bodo, če se bodo izvajali, odpravili nekatere slabosti, opredeljene v tem poročilu.
However, the reform proposes to continue using agricultural funds for a measure, which is not targeted to farmers or to the farming community and with several characteristics such as multiannuality and the non-compulsory nature of support to deprived persons, which are not compatible with the CAP and especially EAGF financing. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Vendar je v reformi predlagano, naj se nadaljuje uporaba kmetijskih sredstev za ukrep, ki ni namenjen kmetom ali kmečki skupnosti in ki ima več značilnosti, kot sta večletnost in neobvezna narava podpore ogroženim osebam, ki niso skladne s skupno kmetijsko politiko in zlasti financiranjem EKJS. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
AND INTEGRATION WITH SOCIAL POLICIES AND COORDINATION WITH SIMILAR MEASURES WOULD ENHANCE THE APPROACH 79. 
POVEZANOST PROGRAMA S SOCIALNIMI POLITIKAMI IN KOORDINACIJA S PODOBNIMI UKREPI PA BI OKREPILI PRISTOP 79.
In general the programme has operated with insufficient coordination and cooperation with other key actors for social actions in the Member States. 
Na splošno pri izvajanju programa ni bilo dovolj usklajevanja in sodelovanja z drugimi ključnimi akterji za socialne ukrepe v državah članicah.
Such cooperation is necessary for better understanding and meeting the needs of the deprived persons and the charitable organisations implementing the programme. 
Tako sodelovanje je potrebno za boljše razumevanje in izpolnjevanje potreb ogroženih oseb in dobrodelnih organizacij, ki izvajajo program.
34 RECOMMENDATION 1 The Commission should consider whether it is appropriate to continue financing such a measure from the Common Agricultural Policy. 
34 PRIPOROČILO 1 Komisija bi morala razmisliti, ali je takšen ukrep primerno še naprej financirati iz skupne kmetijske politike.
RECOMMENDATION 2 The Commission should encourage Member States to take the necessary steps to embed the programme in the social policy framework and improve coordination and cooperation with other key actors for social actions in order to increase the synergy between bodies experienced in managing such programmes. 
PRIPOROČILO 2 Komisija bi morala države članice spodbujati, da sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za vključitev tega programa v okvir socialne politike, ter izboljšati usklajevanje in sodelovanje z drugimi ključnimi akterji za socialne ukrepe, da bi se povečala sinergija med organi, ki imajo izkušnje z upravljanjem takih programov.
PRIORITIES AND TARGETING OF THE RECIPIENTS WOULD INCREASE THE IMPACT OF THE PROGRAMME, ... 
DOLOČITEV PREDNOSTNIH NALOG IN NATANČNEJŠE IZBIRANJE PREJEMNIKOV BI POVEČALA UČINEK PROGRAMA, ...
The measure was introduced primarily to alleviate the difficult situation of the most deprived persons, it was not designed to eliminate all food poverty. 
Ukrep je bil uveden predvsem za olajšanje težkih razmer najbolj ogroženih oseb in ni bil zasnovan za dokončno odpravo prehrambne revščine.
The impact of the scheme is limited in global terms since it offers the equivalent of one meal per month to its beneficiaries. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
Učinek programa je globalno omejen, saj svojim upravičencem v povprečju ponuja en obrok na mesec. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
There are no priorities established within the category of deprived persons to specifically target the aid. 
V kategoriji ogroženih oseb niso opredeljene nobene prednostne skupine, na katere bi bila pomoč posebej usmerjena.
Moreover, the charitable organisations that manage the programme at operational level, mostly staffed by volunteers, address a target group which is not sufficiently stable to facilitate full accountability for the aid received. 
Poleg tega se dobrodelne organizacije, ki upravljajo program na operativni ravni in v katerih delajo predvsem prostovoljci, ukvarjajo s ciljno skupino, ki ni dovolj stabilna, tako da je težje poročati o odgovornosti za upravljanje prejete pomoči.
35 RECOMMENDATION 3 In order to increase the impact of the measure, the Commission should define workable priorities to select the recipients and intermediaries of the aid, taking due account of the specificities of delivery mechanisms involving voluntary bodies and volatile target groups to which generally accepted administrative and control mechanisms are difficult to apply. ...THE VARIETY OF PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTED IS CONSTRAINED BY THE PROGRAMME’S LINK TO PRODUCTS ELIGIBLE FOR PUBLIC STORAGE MEASURES, ... 
35 PRIPOROČILO 3 Za povečanje učinka ukrepa bi morala Komisija opredeliti izvedljiv prednostni vrstni red za izbiro prejemnikov in posrednikov pomoči ter ob tem upoštevati posebnosti mehanizmov izvajanja, ki vključujejo prostovoljne organe in nestabilne ciljne skupine, v zvezi s katerimi je težko uporabljati splošno sprejete upravne in nadzorne mehanizme. ... RAZNOVRSTNOST RAZDELJENIH PROIZVODOV JE OMEJENA ZARADI POVEZANOSTI PROGRAMA S PROIZVODI, KI SO UPRAVIČENI DO UKREPOV JAVNEGA SKLADIŠČENJA, ...
Legal provisions allow the purchase of food products on the Community market in case intervention stocks are temporarily not available for free distribution to deprived persons. 
Pravne določbe omogočajo nakup prehrambnih proizvodov na trgu Skupnosti, če intervencijske zaloge začasno niso na voljo za brezplačno razdeljevanje hrane ogroženim osebam.
However, food thus purchased on the market must belong to the same product group as the one in intervention stocks, which limits the choice of products available for distribution. 
Vendar mora tako kupljena hrana na trgu soditi v isto skupino proizvodov kot hrana v intervencijskih zalogah, kar omejuje izbiro proizvodov, ki so na voljo za razdeljevanje.
RECOMMENDATION 4 The regulatory restriction of foods for distribution to products eligible for intervention storage should be reconsidered in order to increase the diversity, complementarity and nutritional value of the food provided. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
PRIPOROČILO 4 Ponovno je treba preučiti zakonodajno omejitev hrane za razdeljevanje na proizvode, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za intervencijsko skladiščenje, da se omogočijo raznovrstnost, komplementarnost in prehranska vrednost zagotovljene hrane. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
AND DISTRIBUTION VARIES WIDELY 83. 
83.
There is a wide variety of systems applied in the distribution chain from the managing authorities to charitable organisations and to deprived persons. 
V distribucijski verigi – od organov upravljanja do dobrodelnih organizacij in ogroženih oseb – se uporabljajo zelo različni sistemi.
There are no common standards, guidelines at EU or national level concerning the quantity and variety of products to be distribu– ted per person. 
Ni skupnih standardov ali smernic na ravni EU ali na nacionalni ravni o količini in raznovrstnosti proizvodov, ki se razdelijo po osebi.
This increases the risk of low impact which may lead to an unequal treatment of the recipients of the aid. 
To povečuje tveganje, da bo učinek majhen in da posledično prejemniki pomoči ne bodo enakopravno obravnavani.
36 RECOMMENDATION 5 In order to increase the impact of the aid, and to ensure a more equal treatment of recipients, the Commission should consider introducing a level of standardisation consistent with the characteristics of the charitable organisations and of the target group. 
36 PRIPOROČILO 5 Za povečanje učinka pomoči in zagotavljanje bolj enakopravnega obravnavanja prejemnikov bi morala Komisija razmisliti o uvedbi stopnje standardizacije, ki bi bila skladna z značilnostmi dobrodelnih organizacij in ciljne skupine.
MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PROCEDURES NEED TO BE IMPROVED, ... 
POSTOPKE UPRAVLJANJA IN SPREMLJANJA JE TREBA IZBOLJŠATI, ...
The overall objectives of the programme have not been translated into specific, measurable and achievable targets or sub-objectives either by the Commission or the Member States. 
Komisija ali države članice skupnih ciljev programa niso prenesle v izvedljive, merljive in dosegljive cilje ali podcilje.
As the implementation reports of the Member States have, in several cases, been incomplete or contained inconsistent data, the management information available to the Commission on the progress towards the programme’s overall objectives is not sufficiently reliable. 
Ker so bila poročila držav članic o izvajanju v več primerih nepopolna ali so vsebovala nedosledne podatke, informacije o upravljanju, ki jih ima na voljo Komisija o napredku pri doseganju splošnih ciljev programa, niso dovolj zanesljive. Posebno poročilo št.
Considerably different tendering procedures are applied in different Member States, which do not guarantee equal access to all EU operators and do not ensure the broadest competition nor that the best conditions and prices are obtained. 
V različnih državah članicah se uporabljajo zelo različni razpisni postopki, ki ne zagotavljajo enakega dostopa vsem dobaviteljem EU, najširše konkurence ter doseganja najboljših pogojev in cen.
Furthermore, bartering arrangements using intervention stocks are inappropriate and not always cost-effective. F o r t h e C o u r t o f A u d i t o r s F o r t h e C o u r t o f A u d i t o r s 37 RECOMMENDATION 6 The Commission should encourage Member States to develop specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed objectives for the implementation of the programme as well as to define performance indicators to monitor the achievement of objectives. 
Poleg tega mehanizem blagovne menjave, pri katerem se uporabljajo intervencijske zaloge, ni ustrezen in ni vedno stroškovno učinkovit. a a č u s o s o d š č e Z Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira Predsednik aR a č un sk o s o di š č e 37 PRIPOROČILO 6 Komisija bi morala države članice spodbujati, da pripravijo specifične, merljive, dosegljive, ustrezne in časovno opredeljene cilje za izvajanje programa ter opredelijo kazalnike uspešnosti za spremljanje doseganja ciljev.
Furthermore, the Commission should review the reporting system of the scheme in order to ensure that accurate and timely information on the target group and on implementation is available. 
Poleg tega bi morala Komisija preučiti sistem poročanja o programu, da bi zagotovila, da so na voljo točne in pravočasne informacije o ciljni skupini in izvajanju.
RECOMMENDATION 7 In order to increase the openness of competition and to ensure that the best prices on the market are achieved, the Commission should better define the legal basis as well as implementing rules for the procurement of food products for deprived persons. 
PRIPOROČILO 7 Za večjo odprtost konkurence in doseganje najboljših cen na trgu bi morala Komisija bolje opredeliti pravno podlago in izvedbena pravila za nabavo prehrambnih proizvodov za ogrožene osebe.
In addition, the bartering arrangements should be discontinued. 
Poleg tega je treba nehati uporabljati mehanizem blagovne menjave.
Consideration should be given to the disposal of intervention stocks on the market and the resultant proceeds to be used as assigned revenue to purchase the required final products. 
Treba bi bilo razmisliti o prodaji intervencijskih zalog na trgu in o uporabi iz tega izhajajočih prihodkov kot namenskih prejemkov za nakup potrebnih končnih proizvodov.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 14 May 2009. 
To poročilo je sprejelo Računsko sodišče v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju dne 14. maja 2009.
Source: Eurostat, July 2006. 
Vir: Eurostat, julij 2006.
216 000 000 264 000 000 22,2 % 274 000 000 3,8 % 307 000 000 12,0 % 
216 000 000 264 000 000 22,2 % 274 000 000 3,8 % 307 000 000 12,0 % % sredstev,
ANNEX III PRODUCTS ALLOCATED AND FINAL RECIPIENTS ANNUAL PLAN 2005 40 Products allocated (tonnes) Member State Recipients (million) Cereals Rice Butter Milk powder Total (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Belgium 0,221 6 000 3 500 318 410 10 228 Greece n/a 6 972 4 346 2 087 13 405 Spain 0,941 68 721 29 452 9 547 107 720 France Italy 2,509 60 905 31 412 18 143 110 460 2,300 98 153 22 575 14 446 135 174 Malta n/a 1 383 553 1 936 Poland 3,594 17 758 26 835 6 772 3 749 55 114 Portugal 0,485 8 588 14 708 2 594 480 26 370 Finland 0,360 15 000 600 15 600 TOTAL 10,410 283 480 133 381 33 677 Butter 25 469 476 007 Products allocated per recipient (kg) Member State Recipients (million) Cereals Rice Milk powder Total (1) (2)/(1) (3)/(1) (4)/(1) (5)/(1) (6)/(1) Belgium 0,221 27,15 15,84 1,44 1,86 46,28 Greece n/a Spain 0,941 73,03 31,30 10,15 0,00 114,47 France 2,509 24,27 12,52 0,00 7,23 44,03 Italy Poland 2,300 42,68 9,82 6,28 0,00 58,77 Malta n/a 3,594 4,94 7,47 1,88 1,04 15,34 Portugal 0,485 17,71 30,33 5,35 0,99 54,37 Finland 0,360 41,67 0,00 0,00 1,67 43,33 TOTAL 10,410 27,23 12,81 3,24 2,45 45,73 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
PRILOGA III DODELJENI PROIZVODI IN KONČNI PREJEMNIKI NAČRT ZA LETO 2005 Riž 40 Dodeljeni proizvodi (v tonah) Država članica Prejemniki (v milijonih) Žitarice Maslo Mleko v prahu Skupaj (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Belgija 0,221 6 000 3 500 318 410 10 228 Grčija ni na voljo 6 972 4 346 2 087 13 405 Španija 0,941 68 721 29 452 9 547 107 720 Francija 2,509 60 905 31 412 18 143 110 460 Italija 2,300 98 153 22 575 14 446 135 174 Malta ni na voljo 1 383 553 1 936 Poljska 3,594 17 758 26 835 6 772 3 749 55 114 Portugalska 0,485 8 588 14 708 2 594 480 26 370 Finska 0,360 15 000 600 15 600 SKUPAJ 10,410 283 480 133 381 Dodeljeni proizvodi na prejemnika (kg) 33 677 25 469 476 007 Država članica Prejemniki (v milijonih) Žitarice Riž Maslo Mleko v prahu Skupaj (1) (2)/(1) (3)/(1) (4)/(1) (5)/(1) (6)/(1) Belgija 0,221 27,15 15,84 1,44 1,86 46,28 Grčija ni na voljo Španija 0,941 73,03 31,30 10,15 0,00 114,47 Francija 2,509 24,27 12,52 9,82 7,47 0,00 7,23 44,03 Italija 2,300 42,68 6,28 0,00 1,04 58,77 Malta ni na voljo Poljska 3,594 4,94 1,88 15,34 Portugalska 0,485 17,71 30,33 5,35 0,99 54,37 Finska 0,360 41,67 0,00 0,00 1,67 43,33 SKUPAJ 10,410 27,23 12,81 3,24 2,45 45,73 Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
Beef (Italy 5 000 tonnes, Malta 60 tonnes, Portugal 1 500 tonnes, Slovenia 270 tonnes and Finland 1 000 tonnes). 
Goveje meso (Italija 5 000 ton, Malta 60 ton, Portugalska 1 500 ton, Slovenija 270 ton in Finska 1 000 ton).
Skimmed powder milk (Belgium 400 tonnes, France 18 302 tonnes, Luxembourg 18 tonnes, Malta 100 tonnes, Poland 4 750 tonnes, Portugal 1 500 tonnes, Slovenia 135 tonnes and Finland 500 tonnes). (in tonnes) 
Posneto mleko v prahu (Belgija 400 ton, Francija 18 302 ton, Luksemburg 18 ton, Malta 100 ton, Poljska 4 750 ton, Portugalska 1 500 ton, Slovenija 135 ton in Finska 500 ton). (v tonah)
Skimmed powder milk (Czech Rep. 10 tonnes, Greece 3 514 tonnes, Hungary 800 tonnes, Malta 100 tonnes, Portugal 2 000 tonnes, Slovenia 800 tonnes and Finland 500 tonnes). 
Posneto mleko v prahu (Češka 10 ton, Grčija 3 514 ton, Madžarska 800 ton, Malta 100 ton, Portugalska 2 000 ton, Slovenija 800 ton in Finska 500 ton).
ANNEX IV 43 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed Plan 2008 (including amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 182/2008) Member State Cereals Rice Butter Sugar Belgium 16 000 Bulgaria 20 000 Czech Republic 360 Estonia 1 800 Greece 25 000 Spain 110 000 France 97 044 Italy 120 000 Latvia 1 440 Lithuania 25 000 Hungary 60 000 Malta 2 500 Poland 200 000 Portugal 22 000 Romania 200 000 Slovenia 2 000 Finland 16 000 0% 2 000 0% 12 000 0% 0% 3 000 6 500 67 4 6 154 385 67 TOTAL 919 144 0 0 % 91 080 0 67 990 0 0 % 77 890 66 693 86 % Needs (a) (b) (b)/(a) 0% 0% (b)/(a) (b)/(a) 138 % 98% 100 % Allocation Allocation Needs (b)/(a) (a) (b) Needs Allocation (a) (b) Needs (a) Allocation (b) 0% 0% 12 000 0% 39 280 0% 0% 0% 7 000 0% 0% 500 0% 0% 17 500 0% 0% 800 0% 0% 0% 13 000 13 966 25 000 0% 0% 0% 6 500 4 193 7 000 6 3 7 500 718 000 100 % 89% 100 % Other products declared and not allocated: Olive oil (Greece 2 285 tonnes). 
43 PRILOGA IV Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod Načrt za leto 2008 (vključno z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 182/2008 o spremembi Uredbe) Država članica Žitarice Riž Maslo Sladkor Belgija 16 000 Bolgarija 20 000 Češka republika 360 Estonija 1 800 Grčija 25 000 Španija 110 000 Francija 97 044 Italija 120 000 Latvija 1 440 Litva 25 000 Madžarska 60 000 Malta 2 500 Poljska 200 000 Portugalska 22 000 Romunija 200 000 Slovenija 2 000 Finska 16 000 0% 2 000 0% 12 000 0% 0% 3 000 6 500 67 4 6 154 385 67 SKUPAJ 919 144 0 0 % 91 080 0 67 990 0 0 % 77 890 66 693 86 % potrebno dodeljeno (a) (b) potrebno (b)/(a) (a) (b) potrebno dodeljeno (a) (b) potrebno (a) dodeljeno (b) 0% 0% 12 000 0% 39 280 0% 0% 0% 7 000 0% 0% 500 0% 0% 17 500 0% 0% 800 0% 0% 0% 13 000 13 966 25 000 0% 0% 0% 6 500 4 193 7 000 6 3 7 500 718 000 100 % 89 % 100 % dodeljeno Drugi zahtevani proizvodi, ki niso bili dodeljeni: Oljčno olje (Grčija 2 285 ton).
Beef (Belgium 664 tonnes and Malta 60 tonnes). 
Goveje meso (Belgija 664 ton in Malta 60 ton).