natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recommendation 1 – Publish data on urban mobility a) The Commission accepts the recommendation. b) The Commission partially accepts the recommendation, as it cannot prejudge the outcome of the legislative process. 
SL SL Priporočilo 1 – Objava podatkov o mobilnosti v mestih a) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo. b) Komisija delno sprejema priporočilo, saj ne more vplivati na izid zakonodajnega postopka.
Recommendation 2 – Link funding to SUMPs a) The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 2 – Vezava financiranja na načrte za trajnostno mobilnost v mestih a) Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission cannot prejudge the outcome of the ongoing legislative negotiations. 
Komisija ne more vplivati na izid potekajočih zakonodajnih pogajanj.
The success of this depends on the cooperation of the Member States on the discussions on partnership agreement and programme. 
Uspeh bo odvisen od sodelovanja držav članic pri razpravah o partnerskem sporazumu in programih.
The elements to be considered during the selection of individual operations are established at the level of the programmes, under the responsibility of the managing authorities and would need to follow the requirements set out in Article 67 of the proposal for a Common Provision Regulation. b) The Commission partially accepts this recommendation, in as much as it is in line with the legal framework proposed and the partial provisional common understanding reached between the co-legislators on 10 December 2019. 
Elementi, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri izbiri posameznih dejavnosti, se določijo na ravni programov, za kar so odgovorni organi upravljanja, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati zahteve iz člena 67 predloga uredbe o skupnih določbah. b) Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo, kolikor je to v skladu s predlaganim pravnim okvirom in delnim začasnim dogovorom, ki sta ga sozakonodajalca sklenila 10. decembra 2019.
However, the Commission can only act insofar as there is a legal base for its actions as negotiated and agreed by the co-legislators. 
Vendar lahko Komisija ukrepa le, če obstaja pravna podlaga za njene ukrepe, o katerih sta se v pogajanjih dogovorila sozakonodajalca.
Therefore, as a matter of principle, any recommendation going beyond the legal framework ultimately adopted by the Union co-legislators in relation to the interaction between Member States’ proposed programmes and the country-specific recommendations adopted by the Council needs to be addressed to the Member States. c) The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Zato je treba načeloma vsako priporočilo, ki presega pravni okvir, ki sta ga sozakonodajalca Unije na koncu sprejela v zvezi s povezavo med predlaganimi programi držav članic in priporočili za posamezne države, ki jih je sprejel Svet, nasloviti na države članice. c) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
It took initial steps in that direction in the 2019 CEF call for urban nodes. 
Prve korake v tej smeri je sprejela v razpisu Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope iz leta 2019 za urbana vozlišča.
The Commission is committed to continue with this approach in CEF II. 3 
Komisija se je zavezala, da bo ta pristop nadaljevala tudi v okviru Instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope II. 3
The audit was led by ECA Member Iliana Ivanova, supported by Mihail Stefanov, Head of Private Office and James Verity, Private Office Attaché; Niels-Erik Brokopp, Principal Manager; Enrico Grassi, Head of Task; Paloma Munoz Mula, Paolo Pesce, Angelika Zych and Mariya Byalkova, auditors. 
Revizijo je vodila članica Evropskega računskega sodišča Iliana Ivanova, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njenega kabineta Mihail Stefanov, ataše v njenem kabinetu James Verity, vodilni upravni uslužbenec Niels-Erik Brokopp, vodja naloge Enrico Grassi ter revizorji Paloma Munoz Mula, Paolo Pesce, Angelika Zych in Mariya Byalkova.
From left to right: Paloma Munoz Mula, Paolo Pesce, Angelika Zych, James Verity, Iliana Ivanova, Mihail Stefanov, Enrico Grassi, Niels-Erik Brokopp and Mariya Byalkova. 
Od leve proti desni: Paloma Munoz Mula, Paolo Pesce, Angelika Zych, James Verity, Iliana Ivanova, Mihail Stefanov, Enrico Grassi, Niels-Erik Brokopp in Mariya Byalkova.
To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the copyright holders: Picture 7: © QGIS, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. 
Za uporabo in prikazovanje vsebin, katerih lastnica ni EU, je morda treba pridobiti dovoljenje neposredno od imetnikov avtorskih pravic: Slika 7: © QGIS, z licenco CC BY-SA 3.0.
Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the ECA’s reuse policy and are not licensed to you. 
Programska oprema ali dokumenti, za katere veljajo pravice industrijske lastnine, kot so patenti, blagovne znamke, registrirani modeli, logotipi in imena, niso vključeni v politiko Sodišča glede ponovne uporabe in zanje nimate licence.
EN PDF ISBN 978-92-847-4341-4 doi:10.2865/1094 QJ-AB-20-003-EN-N EN HTML ISBN 978-92-847-4326-1 doi:10.2865/517496 QJ-AB-20-003-EN-Q 
SL PDF ISBN 978-92-847-4343-8 doi:10.2865/838200 QJ-AB-20-003-SL-N SL HTML ISBN 978-92-847-4369-8 doi:10.2865/63671 QJ-AB-20-003-SL-Q
Sustainable Urban Mobility is one of the main challenges facing cities in the EU and a matter of concern for many citizens. 
Trajnostna mobilnost v mestih je eden glavnih izzivov, s katerimi se spopadajo mesta v EU, in razlog za skrb številnih državljanov.
Road transport is one of the main causes of air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions in urban areas, and the costs of congestion. to society are around €270 billion a year. 
Cestni prevoz je eden glavnih vzrokov onesnaženosti zraka in emisij toplogrednih plinov na mestnih območjih, družbo pa stroški zaradi zastojev stanejo približno 270 milijard EUR letno.
In 2013, the Commission issued an Urban Mobility Package and provided more funding for clean urban transport – around €13 billion for the 2014-20 period - with the aim of making it more sustainable. 
Komisija je leta 2013 sprejela sveženj o mobilnosti v mestih in zagotovila več sredstev – približno 13 milijard EUR za obdobje 2014–2020 – za okolju prijazen mestni prevoz, ki naj bi tako postal bolj trajnosten.
On the basis of audit work at the Commission and eight different cities in Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain, we found no indication that EU cities are fundamentally changing their approaches and that there is no clear trend towards more sustainable modes of transport. 
Sodišče na podlagi revizijskega dela na Komisiji in v osmih različnih mestih v Nemčiji, Italiji, na Poljskem in v Španiji ni našlo dokazov o tem, da mesta v EU temeljito spreminjajo svoje pristope, in je ugotovilo, da ni očitnega trenda uporabe bolj trajnostnih načinov prevoza.
EN C 417/256 Official Journal of the European Union 6.12.2017 REPORT on the annual accounts of the Single Resolution Board for the financial year 2016, together with the BoardŐs reply (2017/C 417/42) INTRODUCTION 1. 
SL C 417/256 Uradni list Evropske unije 6.12.2017 POROČILO o zaključnem računu Enotnega odbora za reševanje za proračunsko leto 2016 z odgovorom Odbora (2017/C 417/42) UVOD 1.
The Single Resolution Board (hereinafter Ôthe BoardŐ, aka ÔSRBŐ), which is located in Brussels, was established by Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 on the Single Resolution Mechanism (ÔSRM RegulationŐ) (1). 
Enotni odbor za reševanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Odbor ali SRB) s sedežem v Bruslju je bil ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 806/2014 o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje („uredba o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje“) (1).
The mission of the Board is to ensure an orderly resolution of failing credit institutions and certain investment firms (hereinafter ÔCredit InstitutionsŐ) with minimum impact on the real economy and the public finances of the participating Member States of the Banking Union. 
Naloga Odbora je zagotoviti urejeno reševanje kreditnih institucij in nekaterih investicijskih podjetij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „kreditne institucije“) v težavah s čim manjšim učinkom na realni sektor in javna sredstva sodelujočih držav članic bančne unije.
The Board is in charge of administrating the Single Resolution Fund (hereinafter Ôthe FundŐ) which was established by the SRM Regulation and shall support the Single Resolution Mechanism. 
Odbor je odgovoren za upravljanje enotnega sklada za reševanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sklad), ki je bil ustanovljen z uredbo o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje in ki ta mehanizem podpira.
The Fund will be gradually built up during the period 2016 to 2023 and shall reach the target of at least 1 % of the amount of covered deposits of all Credit Institutions within the European Banking Union by 31 December 2023. 
Sklad bo postopno vzpostavljen v obdobju med letoma 2016 in 2023 ter bo do 31. decembra 2023 dosegel ciljno raven v višini vsaj 1 % zneska kritih vlog vseh kreditnih institucij znotraj evropske bančne unije.
The Board has an autonomous budget which is not part of the EU budget. 
Odbor ima svoj avtonomni proračun, ki ni del proračuna EU.
Contributions are raised from Credit Institutions established in Member States participating in the Banking Union. 
Prispevki se zbirajo od kreditnih institucij, ki so ustanovljene v državah članicah, ki sodelujejo v bančni uniji.
The budget for the year 2015 consisted of only Part I (administrative budget). 
Proračun za leto 2015 je zajemal samo prvi del (upravni proračun).
The budget for the year 2016 consisted of Part I amounting to 65 million euro and Part II (Credit InstitutionsŐ contributions to the Fund), amounting to 11 800 million euro. 
Proračun za leto 2016 je zajemal prvi del v vrednosti 65 milijonov EUR in drugi del (prispevki kreditnih institucij v Sklad) v vrednosti 11 800 milijonov EUR.
The Table presents key figures for the Board (2). 
V tabeli so predstavljeni ključni podatki o Odboru (2).
Table Key figures for the Board 2015 22 0 108 Budget (million euro) Part I (BoardŐs administrative budget) Part II (Budget of the Fund) 2016 65 11 800 180 Total staff as at 31 December (1) (1) Staff includes officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts. 
Tabela Ključni podatki o Odboru Proračun (v milijonih EUR) Prvi del (upravni proračun Odbora) Drugi del (proračun Sklada) Skupno število zaposlenih 31. decembra (1) (1) Zaposleni so uradniki, začasni in pogodbeni uslužbenci ter napoteni nacionalni strokovnjaki.
Source: data provided by the Board. 
Vir: Podatki, ki jih je posredoval Odbor.
INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE 5. 
INFORMACIJE V PODKREPITEV IZJAVE O ZANESLJIVOSTI 2016 65 11 800 180 2015 22 0 108 5.
The audit approach taken by the Court comprises analytical audit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an assessment of key controls of the BoardŐs supervisory and control systems. 
Revizijski pristop Sodišča vključuje analitične revizijske postopke, neposredno preizkušanje transakcij in oceno ključnih kontrol nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov Odbora.
(1) OJ L 225, 30.7.2014, p. 
(1) UL L 225, 30.7.2014, str.
(2) More information on the BoardŐs competences and activities is available on its website: http://srb.europa.eu/ 
(2) Več informacij o pristojnostih in dejavnostih Odbora je na voljo na njegovem spletišču: http://srb.europa.eu/.
6.12.2017 Official Journal of the European Union C 417/257 EN OPINION 6. 
6.12.2017 Uradni list Evropske unije C 417/257 SL MNENJE 6.
We have audited: (a) the accounts of the Board which comprise the financial statements (1) and the reports on the implementation of the budget (2) for the financial year ended 31 December 2016; and (b) the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts; as required by Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). 
Sodišče je revidiralo: (a) zaključni račun Odbora, ki ga sestavljajo računovodski izkazi(1) in poročila o izvrševanju proračuna(2) za proračunsko leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2016, ter (b) zakonitost in pravilnost transakcij, povezanih s tem zaključnim računom, kot zahteva člen 287 pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
In our opinion, the accounts of the Board for the year ended 31 December 2016 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Board at 31 December 2016, the results of its operations, its cash flows, and the changes in net assets for the year then ended, in accordance with its Financial Regulation and with accounting rules adopted by the CommissionŐs accounting officer. 
Po mnenju Sodišča zaključni račun Odbora za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2016, v vseh pomembnih pogledih pošteno predstavlja njegov finančni položaj na dan 31. decembra 2016 ter njegov poslovni izid, denarne tokove in gibanje kapitala za tedaj končano leto v skladu z njegovo finančno uredbo in računovodskimi pravili, ki jih je sprejel računovodja Komisije.
Payments Opinion on the legality and regularity of payments underlying the accounts 9. 
Plačila Mnenje o zakonitosti in pravilnosti plačil, povezanih z zaključnim računom 9.
Responsibilities of management and those charged with governance 10. 
Odgovornosti poslovodstva in odgovornih za upravljanje 10.
In accordance with Articles 310 to 325 of the TFEU and the BoardŐs Financial Regulation, management is responsible for the preparation and presentation of the accounts on the basis of internationally accepted accounting standards for the public sector and for the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them. 
V skladu s členi 310 do 325 PDEU in finančno uredbo Odbora je poslovodstvo odgovorno za pripravo in predstavitev zaključnega računa na podlagi mednarodno sprejetih računovodskih standardov za javni sektor ter za zakonitost in pravilnost z izkazi povezanih transakcij.
The BoardŐs management bears the ultimate responsibility for the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts. 
Končno odgovornost za zakonitost in pravilnost transakcij, povezanih z zaključnim računom, ima poslovodstvo Odbora.
In preparing the accounts, management is responsible for assessing the BoardŐs ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting. 
Pri pripravi zaključnega računa je poslovodstvo odgovorno za oceno zmožnosti Odbora, da nadaljuje s poslovanjem, razkritje zadev, povezanih z nadaljevanjem poslovanja, kadar je to ustrezno, ter uporabo računovodstva na osnovi predpostavke o zmožnosti nadaljnjega poslovanja.
(1) (2) The financial statements comprise the statement of financial position, the statement of financial performance, the cash flow statement, the statement of changes in net assets and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes. 
(1) (2) Računovodski izkazi zajemajo izkaz finančnega položaja, izkaz poslovnega izida, izkaz denarnih tokov, izkaz gibanja kapitala ter povzetek pomembnih računovodskih usmeritev in druga pojasnila.
EN C 417/258 Official Journal of the European Union 6.12.2017 AuditorŐs responsibilities for the audit of the accounts and underlying transactions 13. 
SL C 417/258 Uradni list Evropske unije 6.12.2017 Revizorjeva odgovornost za revizijo zaključnega računa in z njim povezanih transakcij 13.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the accounts of the Board are free from material misstatement and the transactions underlying them are legal and regular and to provide, on the basis of our audit, the European Parliament and the Council or other respective discharge authorities with a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them. 
Cilj Sodišča je pridobiti sprejemljivo zagotovilo o tem, ali je zaključni račun Odbora brez pomembno napačne navedbe in ali so transakcije, povezane z zaključnim računom, zakonite in pravilne, ter na podlagi svoje revizije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ali drugim organom za razrešnico zagotoviti izjavo o zanesljivosti zaključnega računa ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njim povezanih transakcij.
In making those risk assessments, internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the accounts and legality and regularity of underlying transactions, are considered in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control. 
Pri oceni tega tveganja se upošteva notranja kontrola, ki se izvaja za pripravo in pošteno predstavitev zaključnega računa ter zakonitost in pravilnost z njim povezanih transakcij, da se pripravijo okoliščinam primerni revizijski postopki, vendar ne za izrekanje mnenja o uspešnosti notranjih kontrol.
For revenue, we verify the BoardŐs procedures for calculating and raising Fund contributions and other income, if any(1). 
Sodišče v zvezi s prihodki Odbora preverja postopke za izračun in pobiranje prispevkov v Sklad in morebitnih drugih prihodkov (1).
Our verification of Fund contributions was based on information communicated by the Credit Institutions through national resolution authorities and did not cover the reliability of this information. 
Naše preverjanje prispevkov v Sklad je temeljilo na informacijah, ki so jih kreditne institucije sporočile preko nacionalnih organov za reševanje. Zanesljivost teh informacij pa ni bila preverjena.
Furthermore, Fund contributions which are the subject of administrative appeals or judicial proceedings between some Credit Institutions and national resolution authorities and of judicial proceedings between some Credit Institutions and the Board before the General Court of the European Union respectively were not subject to our audit in order not to affect in any way the position of the parties in such proceedings. 
Prispevkov v Sklad, ki so predmet upravnih pritožb ali sodnih postopkov med nekaterimi kreditnimi institucijami in nacionalnimi organi za reševanje ter sodnih postopkov med nekaterimi kreditnimi institucijami in Odborom na Splošnem sodišču Evropske unije, Sodišče ni revidiralo, da ne bi vplivalo na položaj strank v teh postopkih.
Detailed information on administrative appeals or judicial proceedings is presented in paragraph 7(i) of the BoardŐs annual accounts.Ő 16. 
Podrobne informacije o upravnih pritožbah ali sodnih postopkih so predstavljene v odstavku 7(i) zaključnega računa Odbora. 16.
Advance payments are examined when the recipient of funds provides justification for their proper use and the Board accepts the justification by clearing the advance payment, whether in the same year or later. 
Predplačila so preučena, ko prejemnik sredstev utemelji njihovo pravilno porabo in Odbor sprejme utemeljitev z obračunom predplačila v istem letu ali pozneje.
In preparing this report and Statement of Assurance, we considered the audit work of the independent external auditor performed on the BoardŐs accounts as stipulated in Article 102(1) of the BoardŐs Financial Regulation. Emphasis of matter 18. 
Sodišče je pri pripravi tega poročila in izjave o zanesljivosti upoštevalo revizijsko delo v zvezi z zaključnim računom Odbora, ki ga je opravil neodvisni zunanji revizor, kot je določeno v členu 102(1) finančne uredbe Odbora.
Without calling into question its opinions expressed in paragraphs 6 to 17, the Court would like to emphasise that Fund contributions are calculated on the basis of information provided by Credit Institutions to the Board through the national resolution authorities. 
Ne da bi bilo zato vprašljivo mnenje iz odstavkov 6 do 17, Sodišče poudarja, da se prispevki v Sklad izračunajo na podlagi informacij, ki jih Odboru posredujejo kreditne institucije preko nacionalnih organov za reševanje.
However, the SRM Regulation does not provide for a comprehensive and consistent control framework to ensure the reliability of the information. 
Kljub temu pa uredba o enotnem mehanizmu ne omogoča celovitega in usklajenega okvira kontrole za zagotovitev zanesljivosti informacij.
Furthermore, the Court notes that the methodology to calculate contributions laid down in the legal framework is very complex, resulting in a risk to accuracy. 
Sodišče ugotavlja, da je metodologija iz pravnega okvira, ki se uporablja za izračun prispevkov, zelo zapletena in lahko privede do tveganja v zvezi s točnostjo.
Moreover, the Board cannot release details on the risk-assessed contribution calculations per Credit Institution as they are interlinked and include confidential information about other Credit Institutions. 
Poleg tega pa Odbor ne sme objavljati podrobnosti o prispevkih, izračunanih na podlagi ocene tveganja, po kreditnih institucijah, saj so te medsebojno povezane in vključujejo zaupne informacije o drugih kreditnih institucijah.
This affects the transparency of these calculations. 
To vpliva na preglednost teh izračunov.
(1) Fund contributions for the year 2015 transferred to the Board in 2016 were calculated by national resolution authorities and therefore not subject to the CourtŐs audit. 
(1) Prispevke v Sklad za leto 2015, ki so bili preneseni v Odbor v letu 2016, so izračunali nacionalni organi za reševanje, zato jih Sodišče ni revidiralo.
EN 6.12.2017 Official Journal of the European Union C 417/259 19. 
SL 6.12.2017 Uradni list Evropske unije C 417/259 19.
COMMENTS ON THE RELIABILITY OF THE ACCOUNTS 20. 
PRIPOMBA O ZANESLJIVOSTI ZAKLJUČNEGA RAČUNA 20.
The BoardŐs accounting system was not yet validated by the Accounting Officer. 
Računovodskega sistema Odbora računovodja še ni potrdil.
Article 92(4) of the SRM Regulation requires the Court to report in particular on the contingent liabilities of the Board, the Council and the Commission as a result of the performance of their tasks under the SRM Regulation. 
V členu 92(4) uredbe o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje je določeno, da mora Sodišče poročati zlasti o pogojnih obveznostih Odbora, Sveta in komisije, do katerih pride zaradi izvajanja njihovih nalog v okviru te uredbe.
The Court will publish a separate report on this matter. 
Sodišče bo o tej zadevi objavilo ločeno poročilo.
COMMENTS ON BUDGETARY MANAGEMENT Part I (the BoardŐs administrative budget) 22. 
PRIPOMBE O UPRAVLJANJU PRORAČUNA Prvi del (upravni proračun Odbora) 22.
The implementation rate was low at 62 % (2015: 67 %), or 35 million euro (2015: 15 million euro) of available appropriations. 
Stopnja izvrševanja je bila nizka in je znašala 62 % (2015: 67 %), ali 35 milijonov EUR (2015: 15 milijonov EUR) vseh razpoložljivih odobrenih sredstev.
This is mainly caused by the nature of the BoardŐs activities and the legal budgetary framework in place. 
To je predvsem posledica narave aktivnosti Odbora in veljavnega pravnega okvira.
While the budget provides appropriations for the BoardŐs daily operations and the administration of resolution cases, no resolution occurred in 2016. 
Kljub temu, da proračun zagotavlja odobrena sredstva za vsakodnevne operacije Odbora in upravljanje reševanja primerov, leta 2016 ni bilo nobenega reševanja.
The unused appropriations will reduce future contributions from Credit Institutions. 
Neporabljena odobrena sredstva bodo zmanjšala prihodnje prispevke iz kreditnih institucij.
The committed appropriations carried over under budget title II (administrative expenditure) amount to 3,1 million euro, i.e. 35 % (2015: 3,3 million euro, i.e. 70 %) of total committed appropriations. 
V naslovu II (upravni odhodki) je bilo prenesenih 3,1 milijona EUR ali 35 % vseh odobritev, za katere so bile prevzete obveznosti (2015: 3,3 milijona EUR ali 70 %).
They mainly concern IT contracts signed in 2016 (1,9 million euro) and security services provided in 2016 that were not yet invoiced and paid (0,6 million euro). 
Nanašajo se predvsem na pogodbe IT, ki so bile podpisane leta 2016 (1,9 milijona EUR), in varnostne storitve, ki so bile izvedene v letu 2016 in za katere računi še niso bili izdani in plačani (0,6 milijona EUR).
The committed appropriations carried over under budget title III (operational expenditure) amount to 5,3 million euro, i.e. 66 % (2015: 1,6 million euro, i.e. 40 %) of committed appropriations. 
V naslovu III (operativni odhodki) je bilo prenesenih 5,3 milijona EUR ali 66 % vseh odobritev, za katere so bile prevzete obveznosti (2015: 1,6 milijona EUR ali 40 %).