natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Net financial corrections possible each year if serious weaknesses are detected that were not identified by the Member State 129. 
Neto finančni popravki so mogoči vsako leto, če se odkrijejo resne slabosti, ki jih niso ugotovile države članice 129.
For the 2007‐2013 programme period, the criteria for applying a net financial correction depended on whether the Member State accepted the observation (i.e. the error) and confirmed the related impact (i.e. applied the amount of financial correction) or not44. If this was not the case, the Commission needed to adopt a financial correction decision. 
Za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 so bila merila za uporabo neto finančnih popravkov odvisna od tega, ali je zadevna država članica sprejela opažanje (tj. napako) in potrdila z njim povezan učinek (tj. uporabila znesek finančnega popravka) ali ne.44 Če tega ni storila, je morala Komisija sprejeti sklep o finančnem popravku.
Only the Commission decision had a direct net effect (see paragraph 19). 
Samo sklep Komisije je imel neposreden neto učinek (glej odstavek 19).
This arrangement has been replaced by a self‐correcting system, where the Member State needs to apply the financial correction up front. 
Ta ureditev je bila nadomeščena s samopopravljalnim sistemom, pri katerem mora zadevna država članica finančni popravek uporabiti vnaprej.
During the 2014‐2020 programme period, if serious system deficiencies are found that have not been detected by the Member State in the context of its verifications or audits before the annual acceptance of accounts (either by the Commission or through our audits), the Commission will apply a net financial correction leading to loss of funding for the Member State45. 131. 
Če se v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 ugotovijo resne sistemske pomanjkljivosti, ki jih zadevna država članica ni odkrila v okviru svojih preverjanj ali revizij pred letnim sprejetjem obračuna (če jih ugotovi Komisija ali Evropsko računsko sodišče pri svojih revizijah), bo Komisija uporabila neto finančne popravke, ki bodo privedli do izgube sredstev za to državo članico.45 131.
This system aims to further incentivise Member States, and in particular their audit authorities, to ensure that EU funds are spent in a legal and regular manner and that all necessary financial corrections have been applied at national level to protect the EU budget from irregular expenditure. 
Namen tega sistema je dodatno spodbuditi države članice in zlasti njihove revizijske organe, da zagotovijo, da so sredstva EU porabljena zakonito in pravilno in da so bili na nacionalni ravni uporabljeni vsi potrebni finančni popravki za zaščito proračuna EU pred nepravilnimi odhodki.
This responsibility lies primarily with the managing authorities. 
Za to so v prvi vrsti odgovorni organi upravljanja.
The audit authorities will, however, act as a last line of defence to avoid part of the national envelopes already being lost during programme implementation. 
Revizijski organi pa bodo delovali kot zadnje varovalo za preprečevanje tega, da se del nacionalnih ovojnic izgubi že med izvajanjem programa.
Moreover, the financial corrections will be applied on an annual basis and be clearly linked to the release of the subsequent interim payment. 
Poleg tega se bodo finančni popravki uporabljali letno in jasno bodo povezani s sprostitvijo naslednjega vmesnega plačila.
A comparison between the arrangements for the 2007‐2013 and 2014‐2020 period is provided in Annex V. 132. 
Primerjava ureditev v obdobjih 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 je prikazana v Prilogi V. 132.
We also observed that procedures resulting in financial corrections during the 2007‐ 2013 period took a long time to resolve (see paragraph 87). 
Sodišče je opazilo tudi, da so bili postopki, ki privedejo do finančnih popravkov, v obdobju 2007–2013 dolgotrajni (glej odstavek 87).
Similar issues were identified for the 2000‐2006 programme period in one of the Court’s previous special reports46. 
programskem obdobju 2000–2006 v enem od prejšnjih posebnih poročil Računskega sodišča.46 133.
133. We consider that the duration of these procedures will be significantly shortened by the requirement to close the accounts and submit the assurance package by a set deadline (15 February of the following year). 
Sodišče meni, da se bo trajanje teh postopkov bistveno skrajšalo z zahtevo, da je treba zaključiti račune in predložiti sveženj zagotovil do določenega roka (15. februarja naslednje leto).
This will incentivise the Member States to remedy problems faster in order to be able to include related expenditure in the accounts, and is likely to contribute to a significant speeding‐up of the process compared to the 2007‐2013 period. 
To bo spodbudilo države članice, da bodo probleme reševale hitreje, da bi lahko zadevne odhodke vključile v računovodske izkaze, in verjetno prispevalo k bistveni pospešitvi postopka v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007–2013.
Payment suspensions and financial corrections at closure are also possible for non‐ achievement of performance targets 134. During the 2014‐2020 programme period it will also be possible to initiate suspension procedures and impose financial corrections if the performance indicators set are not achieved. 
Do začasne ustavitve plačil in finančnih popravkov ob zaključku lahko pride tudi zaradi nedoseganja ciljev smotrnosti 134. V programskem obdobju 2014–2020 bo mogoče uvesti postopek za začasno ustavitev plačil in naložiti finančne popravke tudi, če ne bodo doseženi kazalniki smotrnosti.
This under‐performance must, however, be due to clearly identified implementation weaknesses and the Commission is required to communicate these weaknesses to the Member State47. If the Member State has failed to take corrective action to address these weaknesses, the Commission may suspend payments to the Member State. 
Razlog za to nezadostno smotrnost pa so lahko le jasno opredeljene slabosti pri izvajanju, Komisija pa mora te pomanjkljivosti sporočiti zadevni državi članici.47 Če država članica ni sprejela popravljalnih ukrepov za obravnavo teh slabosti, lahko Komisija začasno ustavi plačila tej državi članici.
At the end of the programme period, if the Member State has still failed to take corrective action to address the weaknesses, the Commission may apply financial corrections. 
Če zadevna država članica na koncu programskega obdobja še ni sprejela popravljalnih ukrepov za obravnavo slabosti, lahko Komisija uporabi finančne popravke.
We consider that this is a first step towards addressing our long‐standing criticism that there were no adequate legal provisions to impose financial corrections for under‐ performance during the 2007‐2013 programme period (see paragraph 25). 
Sodišče meni, da je to prvi korak k obravnavi naše dolgoletne kritike, da ni ustreznih pravnih določb za naložitev finančnih popravkov za nezadostno smotrnost v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 (glej odstavek 25).
Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014 of 3 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (OJ L 138, 13.5.2014, p. 
480/2014 z dne 3. marca 2014 o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo (UL L 138, 13.5.2014, str.
5). Measures linked to sound economic governance issues introduced, but difficult to apply in practice 136. 
5). vsebuje nobenih pravih finančnih spodbud niti sankcij v zvezi z rezultati, doseženimi s sredstvi EU.48 Ukrepi, povezani z vprašanji dobrega gospodarskega upravljanja, so bili uvedeni, vendar jih je v praksi težko uporabljati 136.
Moreover, in 2014‐2020 programme period, the Commission can also apply suspensions for issues related to wider sound economic governance issues49. In particular, the Commission may propose that the Council suspend payments or commitments if the Member State has not taken appropriate action to amend its Partnership Agreement50 or if the Member State has not taken effective action to correct its excessive deficit. 
V programskem obdobju 2014–2020 lahko Komisija začasne ustavitve uporabi tudi pri širših vprašanjih dobrega gospodarskega upravljanja.49 Predvsem lahko predlaga, da Svet začasno ustavi plačila ali obveznosti, če zadevna država članica ni sprejela ustreznih ukrepov za spremembo svojega partnerskega sporazuma50 ali če država članica ni sprejela uspešnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje čezmernega primanjkljaja.
However, in situations linked to economic governance, the decision to suspend payments does not lie entirely with the Commission. 
Vendar v primerih, povezanih z gospodarskim upravljanjem, odločitev o začasni ustavitvi plačil ni v izključni pristojnosti Komisije.
The Commission must keep the European Parliament (EP) informed whenever such a situation arises and must enter into a structured dialogue with the EP if asked to do so. 
Kadar pride do takega primera, mora Komisija obveščati Evropski parlament (EP) in na njegovo pobudo začeti strukturiran dialog z njim.
Following this, the Commission needs to make a proposal to the Council to suspend the payment, and the Council then takes its decision in an implementing act. 
Potem mora Komisija Svetu predlagati začasno ustavitev plačila, Svet pa nato odloči v izvedbenem aktu.
For suspensions linked to economic governance, the maximum levels of suspension as a percentage of payments or commitments is also set in the regulation. 
Za začasne ustavitve plačil, povezane z gospodarskim upravljanjem, so v uredbi določene tudi najvišje stopnje začasne ustavitve kot odstotek plačil ali obveznosti.
The Commission envisaged proposing payment suspensions linked to economic governance (and in particular the excessive deficit) issues for the first time in the case of Spain and Portugal in 201651. In November 2016, the Commission decided not to propose a suspension in the above cases, in view of the challenging economic and fiscal situation. 
Komisija je prvič nameravala predlagati ustavitev plačil zaradi vprašanj gospodarskega upravljanja (zlasti čezmernega primanjkljaja) v primeru Španije in Portugalske leta 2016.51 Novembra 2016 pa se je odločila, da v teh primerih zaradi zapletenih gospodarskih in fiskalnih razmer ne bo predlagala začasne ustavitve.
49 50 51 66 Article 23 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
Namesto tega je priporočila, da 48 49 50 51 65 Letno poročilo za proračunsko leto 2013, odstavek 10.16. Člen 23 Uredbe (EU) št.
See Special Report No 2/2017 “The Commission's negotiation of 2014‐2020 Partnership Agreements and programmes in Cohesion: spending more targeted on Europe 2020 priorities, but increasingly complex arrangements to measure performance” (http://eca.europa.eu). 
Glej posebno poročilo št. 2/2017 – Pogajanja Komisije o partnerskih sporazumih in programih na področju kohezije za obdobje 2014–2020: poraba je bolj osredotočena na prioritete strategije Evropa 2020, vendar je ureditev za merjenje smotrnosti vedno bolj zapletena (http://eca.europa.eu).
Based on the Council’s decision of 12 July 2016 under Article 126(8) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union establishing that Spain and Portugal did not take effective action under the Excessive Deficit Procedure. 
Na podlagi Sklepa Sveta z dne 12. julija 2016 v skladu s členom 126(8) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v katerem je ugotovljeno, da Španija in Portugalska nista sprejeli uspešnih ukrepov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
Increased legal certainty due to setting rules as regulations rather than guidance 139. 
Večja pravna varnost zaradi določitve pravil v obliki uredbe in ne smernic 139.
During the 2014‐2020 period, the rules applicable for financial corrections have a different legal form (and, as a result, corresponding stricter legal value). 
V obdobju 2014–2020 imajo pravila, ki se uporabljajo za finančne popravke, drugačno pravno obliko (in posledično ustrezno strožjo pravno veljavo).
For example, (a) the method of determining financial corrections and the indicative rates of corrections to be applied for public procurement errors have, since the 2000‐2006 programme period, been set out in Commission guidelines52. These guidelines describe the method used by the Commission in the relevant cases and their use was recommended to Member States. 
Na primer, (a) metoda za določanje finančnih popravkov in okvirne stopnje popravkov napak, ki se uporabljajo za javno naročanje, so bile od programskega obdobja 2000–2006 določene v smernicah Komisije.52 V teh smernicah je opisana metoda, ki jo je uporabila Komisija v ustreznih primerih, njena uporaba pa je priporočena državam članicam.
The 2013 update of these rules to be used by the Commission was issued as a Commission Decision53; (b) The Commission’s methodology for applying flat rate corrections for the 2007‐2013 programme period was set in a 2011 Commission Decision54. 
Posodobitev teh pravil, ki jih uporablja Komisija, je bila v letu 2013 izdana kot sklep Komisije53; (b) metodologija Komisije za uporabo pavšalnih popravkov za programsko obdobje 2007– 2013 je bila določena v sklepu Komisije iz leta 201154.
Similar rules for the 2014‐ 2020 programme period were included in a Commission Delegated Regulation55. 
Podobna pravila za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 so bila vključena v delegirano uredbo Komisije55.
This puts the Commission into a stronger position to enforce those provisions and to ensure a more consistent approach across Member States during the 2014‐2020 period. 
Zato Komisija laže izvaja te določbe in zagotavlja doslednejši pristop v državah članicah v obdobju 2014–2020.
Setting out the applicable rules as a Regulation or Commission Decision rather than guidance also leaves less discretion to the Commission when deciding on the level of correction and thus increases legal certainty for Member States. 
Določitev veljavnih pravil v obliki uredbe ali sklepa Komisije namesto smernic je tudi omejila prosto presojo Komisije pri odločanju o velikosti popravka in s tem povečala pravno varnost za države članice.
52 53 54 55 COCOF 07/0037/03 Guidelines for determining financial corrections to be made to expenditure co‐financed by the Structural Funds or the Cohesion Fund for non‐compliance with the rules on public procurement. Commission Decision C(2013)9527 of 19.12.2013 on the setting out and approval of the guidelines for determining financial corrections to be made by the Commission to expenditure financed by the Union under shared management, for non‐compliance with the rules on public procurement. 
52 53 54 55 Smernice COCOF 07/0037/03 za določanje finančnih popravkov pri izdatkih, ki jih sofinancirajo strukturni skladi in Kohezijski sklad, v primerih neupoštevanja pravil o javnih naročilih; Sklep Komisije C(2013) 9527 z dne 19.12.2013 o opredelitvi in odobritvi smernic za določanje finančnih popravkov pri izdatkih, financiranih s strani Unije v okviru deljenega upravljanja, ki jih izvede Komisija zaradi neskladnosti s pravili o javnih naročilih.
Commission Decision C(2011)7321. 
Sklep Komisije C(2011) 7321.
Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 480/2014. 
Člen 31 Uredbe (EU) št.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 141. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 141.
Overall, until end 2015 (i.e. before the closure of the 2007-2013 programme period) the Commission has made effective use of the measures at its disposal for the 2007-2013 programming period to protect the EU budget from irregular expenditure. 
Komisija je do konca leta 2015 (tj. pred zaključkom programskega obdobja 2007–2013) na splošno uspešno uporabljala ukrepe, ki jih je imela na voljo v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 za zaščito proračuna EU pred nepravilnimi odhodki.
Our audit showed that financial corrections for the 2000-2006 period amounted to 8.616 million euro or 3.8 % of the total ERDF, CF and ESF budget. 
Revizija, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče, je pokazala, da so finančni popravki v obdobju 2000– 2006 znašali 8 616 milijonov EUR ali 3,8 % skupnega proračuna ESRR, Kohezijskega sklada in ESS.
At closure there were net financial corrections for a number of ERDF and ESF programmes and CF projects in 17 Member States for the ERDF, 16 Member States for the ESF and eleven Member States for CF. 
Ob zaključku programa so bili naloženi neto finančni popravki za več programov ERSS in ESS ter projektov Kohezijskega sklada: v 17 državah članicah za programe ESRR, 16 državah članicah za programe ESS in 11 državah članicah za projekte Kohezijskega sklada.
The overall amount of these net corrections was 2 423 million euro (or 1.1 % of the total budget). 
Skupni znesek teh neto popravkov je bil 2 423 milijonov EUR (ali 1,1 % skupnega proračuna).
We also found that the Commission’s assessment of weaknesses and financial corrections was in substance confirmed by the European Court of Justice. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da je oceno Komisije v zvezi s slabostmi in finančne popravke meritorno potrdilo Sodišče Evropske unije.
While we expect the situation to be similar for the 2007-2013 period, the final impact of financial corrections can be determined only at closure. 
Sodišče sicer pričakuje, da bo v obdobju 2007–2013 podobno, vendar je mogoče končni učinek finančnih popravkov določiti šele ob zaključku.
Based on our examination of the 2000-2006 closure payments, we also consider that the Commission needs to remain vigilant when checking the closure declaration submitted by the Member States. 
Na podlagi preučitve plačil ob zaključku obdobja 2000–2006 Sodišče meni, da mora Komisija pri preverjanju izjav o zaključitvi, ki jih predložijo države članice, ostati pozorna.
For the 2007-2013 period the Commission used payment suspension more extensively than in the past and the newly introduced payment interruptions were a helpful additional tool. 
V obdobju 2007–2013 je Komisija začasno ustavitev plačil uporabljala več kot v preteklosti, novouvedene prekinitve plačil pa so bile koristno dodatno orodje.
Preventive measures were also applied earlier than in the previous period. 
Tudi preventivni ukrepi so bili uporabljeni prej kot v prejšnjem obdobju.
In relative terms, we expect that more financial corrections will be implemented for the 2007-2013 period than in the previous period. 
Sodišče pričakuje, da bo v obdobju 2007–2013 v relativnem smislu izvedenih več finančnih popravkov kot v prejšnjem obdobju.
We also found that the Commission imposed its preventive measures and financial corrections in a proportionate manner. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je Komisija svoje preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke naložila sorazmerno.
The Commission’s internal procedures for the 2007-2013 period aimed at ensuring harmonised treatment of cases between programmes and Member States. 
Cilj notranjih postopkov Komisije za obdobje 2007–2013 je bil zagotoviti usklajeno obravnavo primerov med programi in državami članicami.
Our analysis also confirmed that the Commission’s measures for 2007-2013 period focussed on those Member States with the riskiest programmes. 
Analiza Sodišča je potrdila tudi, da so bili ukrepi Komisije za obdobje 2007–2013 osredotočeni na tiste države članice, ki so imele najbolj tvegane programe.
The Commission’s corrective measures put pressure on Member States to address weaknesses in their management and control systems. 
Popravljalni ukrepi Komisije pomenijo pritisk na države članice, naj obravnavajo slabosti v svojih sistemih upravljanja in kontrole.
financial risk for Member States. 
države članice.
For the 2007-2013 period the Commission therefore aimed to gradually lift measures to ensure that the reimbursement of expenditure could be resumed as soon as possible for the part of the programme not affected by the shortcomings which initially led to the interruption or suspension. 
V obdobju 2007–2013 je Komisija zato skušala postopoma odpraviti svoje preventivne ukrepe zaradi zagotavljanja, da se lahko čim prej znova začne povračilo odhodkov iz proračuna EU za del programa, na katerega pomanjkljivosti, ki so prvotno povzročile prekinitev ali začasno ustavitev, niso vplivale.
We also found, however, that the Commission faces difficulties in monitoring the implementation of financial corrections. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da ima Komisija težave pri spremljanju izvajanja finančnih popravkov.
The information provided by the Member States on their implementation of financial corrections in the 2007-2013 period does not yet allow for robust monitoring. 
Informacije, ki so jih zagotovile države članice o svojem izvajanju teh finančnih popravkov v obdobju 2007–2013, še ne omogočajo zanesljivega spremljanja.
We also found mixed evidence of the long-term impact of preventive measures and financial corrections on programme error levels in the 2007-2013 period. 
Sodišče je našlo tudi mešane dokaze o dolgoročnem učinku preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov na stopnje napake v programih v obdobju 2007–2013.
The Commission’s reporting on preventive measures and financial corrections makes it difficult to get a comprehensive and analytical overview. This is mainly due to the fact that the information on preventive measures and financial corrections is presented in several reports and documents, one of which was not even known by stakeholders. 
S poročanjem Komisije o preventivnih ukrepih in finančnih popravkih je težko dobiti celovit in analitičen pregled, predvsem zato, ker so informacije o preventivnih ukrepih in finančnih popravkih predstavljene v več poročilih in dokumentih, od katerih deležniki enega sploh niso poznali.
At the same time, none of the Commission reports provides an analytical overview of preventive measures and financial corrections for the 2007-2013 programme period as a whole. 
Hkrati v nobenem poročilu Komisije ni analitičnega pregleda preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 kot celoto.
This report should present and compare all information on preventive 69 Recommendation 1 The Commission should apply a strict approach to financial corrections at the closure of the 2007-2013 period to ensure that the total amounts reimbursed from the EU budget are free from material levels of irregular expenditure. 
68 Priporočilo 1 Komisija naj uporablja strog pristop k finančnim popravkom ob zaključku obdobja 2007– 2013, da bi zagotovila, da v skupnih zneskih, povrnjenih iz proračuna EU, ni pomembnih stopenj nepravilnih odhodkov.
Target implementation date: from March 2017 (start of closure exercise). 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: od marca 2017 (začetek postopka zaključevanja).
We noted shortcomings in information systems used by the Commission to monitor and report on preventive measures and financial corrections for 2007-2013 programmes. 
Sodišče je odkrilo pomanjkljivosti v informacijskih sistemih, ki jih Komisija uporablja za spremljanje in poročanje o preventivnih ukrepih in finančnih popravkih za programe v obdobju 2007–2013.
In particular, the information systems are not integrated and they do not provide an overview for individual cases of all preventive measures and financial corrections. 
Ti predvsem niso medsebojno povezani in ne zagotavljajo pregleda vseh preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov za posamezne primere.
70 Recommendation 3 For the 2014-2020 period, the Commission should set up an integrated monitoring system covering both preventive measures and financial corrections. 
Priporočilo 3 Komisija naj za obdobje 2014–2020 vzpostavi celovit sistem spremljanja, ki bo zajel tako preventivne ukrepe kot finančne popravke.
Target implementation date: 2019. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: leto 2019.