natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore the most complete system which systematically collects information about criminal cases linked to the EU financial interests is IMS. 
Tako je najcelovitejši sistem, ki sistematično zbira informacije o kazenskih zadevah, povezanih s finančnimi interesi EU, sistem za upravljanje nepravilnosti.
As any system, the Commission acknowledges that IMS may be further improved. 
Komisija priznava, da je tako kot vsak sistem tudi sistem za upravljanje nepravilnosti mogoče še izboljšati.
Common reply to paragraphs 33–36: The Commission considers that, in the context of measuring fraud in the EU budget, estimating fraud through victimisation, encounter and perception studies is not fit-for-purpose, as these methods are more focused on identifying or using risk indicators for specific purposes and in specific sectors on the basis of administrative data. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke 33–36: Komisija meni, da v okviru merjenja goljufij v proračunu EU ocenjevanje goljufij na podlagi študij o žrtvah, srečevanju ali zaznavi ne ustreza namenu, saj so te metode bolj osredotočene na opredelitev ali uporabo kazalnikov tveganja za posebne namene in v posameznih sektorjih na podlagi upravnih podatkov.
The ECA makes reference to survey-based indexes for measuring corruption and suggests that this methodology can be translated in the context of measuring undetected fraud against the EU budget. 
Evropsko računsko sodišče navaja indekse za merjenje korupcije, ki temeljijo na anketah, in predlaga, da se lahko ta metodologija uporabi v okviru merjenja neodkritih goljufij, ki škodujejo proračunu EU.
These methods are open to several criticisms highlighted by the same publications referred to by the ECA itself. 
Te metode so predmet več kritik, na katere je opozorjeno v istih publikacijah, na katere se sklicuje samo Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Furthermore, these difficulties are significantly increased in relation to certain areas of budget expenditure, such as development aid. 
Poleg tega so te težave znatno večje na nekaterih področjih proračunskih odhodkov, kot je razvojna pomoč.
In addition, according to paragraph 3.14 of the ECA's Annual Report 2015, the Composite Indicators Research Group (financed by the EU) has pointed to the fact that composite indicators, while they illustrate the bigger picture, may lead to simplistic policy conclusions. 8 
Prav tako je v skladu z odstavkom 3.14 letnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča za leto 2015 Raziskovalna skupina za sestavljene kazalnike (Composite Indicators Research Group) (ki jo financira EU) opozorila, da sestavljeni kazalniki sicer kažejo širšo sliko, vendar lahko vodijo do poenostavljenih ugotovitev politike. 8
Therefore, while useful for other purposes, victimisation, encounter or perception surveys would not be well-suited for measuring fraud to EU spending and would risk leading to biased decision-making or, at least, to an added-value not proportionate to the cost. 
Čeprav so ankete o žrtvah, srečevanju ali zaznavi koristne za druge namene, torej ne bi bile primerne za merjenje goljufij pri porabi EU in bi lahko vodile do pristranskega odločanja ali vsaj do dodane vrednosti, ki ni sorazmerna s stroški.
Finally, the Financial Regulation provides that the EU budget shall be implemented in compliance with the proportionality principle and an effective and efficient internal control. 
Finančna uredba navsezadnje določa, da se proračun EU izvršuje v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti ter uspešno in učinkovito notranjo kontrolo.
In this respect, the prevention, detection, correction and follow-up of fraud and irregularities is based on best international practices, and rests on the implementation of an appropriate risk management and control strategy coordinated among appropriate actors involved in the control chain. 
V zvezi s tem preprečevanje, odkrivanje in odpravljanje goljufij in nepravilnosti ter nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi z njimi temeljijo na najboljših mednarodnih praksah ter izvajanju ustrezne strategije obvladovanja tveganja in strategije kontrole, usklajene med ustreznimi udeleženci v verigi kontrole.
The Financial Regulation provides that internal control and budget implementation should evolve with an improvement of the cost benefit ratio of controls. 
Finančna uredba določa, da se morata notranja kontrola in izvrševanje proračuna razvijati skupaj z izboljševanjem razmerja med stroški in koristmi kontrol.
In other terms, the cost of controls must be proportionate and commensurate with results in terms of recovery. 
Povedano drugače, stroški kontrol morajo biti sorazmerni in skladni z rezultati v smislu izterjave.
The Commission is committed to improving the risk management assessment and control strategy. 
Komisija se zavezuje, da bo izboljšala strategijo za oceno obvladovanja tveganja in kontrolo.
Box 1 The Commission underlines that the quality of control of corruption was only one of the indicators used in the study "Assessing the quality of government at the regional level using public procurement data". 
Okvir 1 Komisija poudarja, da je bila kakovost obvladovanja korupcije samo eden od kazalnikov, uporabljenih v študiji z naslovom „Ocenjevanje kakovosti upravljanja na regionalni ravni z uporabo podatkov o javnem naročanju“.
The Commission considers that the examples of the ECA illustrate that the Commission can enhance its fraud analysis. 
Po mnenju Komisije je iz primerov Evropskega računskega sodišča razvidno, da lahko Komisija še izboljša svojo analizo goljufij.
However, the illustrated methods are not cost-effective to estimate the scale of undetected fraud or corruption in a robust, reliable and defendable manner to support evidence-based policy initiatives, given the diversity of the EU budget. 
Vendar pa prikazane metode glede na raznolikost proračuna EU niso stroškovno učinkovite za trdno, zanesljivo in utemeljeno oceno obsega neodkritih goljufij ali korupcije, na kateri bi temeljile z dokazi podprte pobude politike.
OLAF analyses fraud also to comply with Regulation 883/2013. 
Urad OLAF analizira goljufije tudi zato, da bi ravnal v skladu z Uredbo št. 883/2013.
OLAF contributes to the design and development of methods of preventing and combating fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. 
Urad prispeva k zasnovi in razvoju metod preprečevanja in zatiranja goljufij, korupcije in drugih nezakonitih dejanj, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije.
OLAF promotes and coordinates, with and among the Member States, the sharing of operational experience and best procedural practices. 
Skupaj z državami članicami in poleg njih spodbuja in usklajuje izmenjavo operativnih izkušenj in dobrih postopkovnih praks.
Common reply to paragraphs 40-42: The PIF Report refers to the whole budget of the EU and for this reason it must keep a general approach. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke 40–42: Poročilo o zaščiti finančnih interesov se nanaša na celoten proračun EU in mora zato ohraniti splošni pristop.
The analysis is deepened, refined and enriched year after year (as recognised by the main stakeholders: the Member States and the European Parliament). 
Analiza je vsako leto bolj poglobljena, izpopolnjena in bogata (kot priznavajo glavni deležniki: države članice in Evropski parlament).
The PIF Report 2017, for instance, includes a detailed analysis by component in the agricultural policy and adds an analysis of "Transport", another priority area. 
Poročilo o zaščiti finančnih interesov za leto 2017 na primer vključuje podrobno analizo po komponentah v kmetijski politiki in dodaja analizo „prometa“, ki je še eno prednostno področje.
OLAF analyses the nature or modus operandi of fraud, in general (through the PIF Report) and more in-depth (through specific projects). 
Urad OLAF analizira naravo in način delovanja goljufij na splošno (s poročilom o zaščiti finančnih interesov) in bolj poglobljeno (s posebnimi projekti).
OLAF’s own analytical work on fraud patterns and systemic vulnerabilities could indeed be intensified and broadened, as suggested by the ECA, depending on the resources devoted to analysis and prevention. 
Lastno analitično delo urada OLAF v zvezi z vzorci goljufij in sistemskimi ranljivimi točkami bi se dejansko lahko okrepilo in razširilo, kot predlaga Evropsko računsko sodišče, kar je odvisno od sredstev, namenjenih analizi in preprečevanju.
Although spending programmes develop over time, the fundamentals of the programmes, and therefore the risks of fraud, will not change substantially. 
Čeprav se programi porabe sčasoma razvijajo, se temeljne značilnosti programov, torej tudi tveganja goljufij, ne bodo bistveno spremenile.
The case compendiums therefore remain valid and useful. 
Zbirke primerov zato ostajajo tehtne in koristne.
The Commission considers that the analysis of fraud patterns and systemic vulnerabilities should be a priority while noting that such studies are very resource-intensive. 
Komisija meni, da bi morala biti analiza vzorcev goljufij in sistemskih ranljivih točk prednostna naloga, hkrati pa opozarja, da take študije zahtevajo zelo veliko sredstev.
In accordance with Article 74(2) of the Financial Regulation, the Commission has a decentralised structure for internal control, including risk analysis and anti-fraud action. 
V skladu s členom 74(2) finančne uredbe ima Komisija decentralizirano strukturo za notranjo kontrolo, vključno z analizo tveganja in ukrepi za boj proti goljufijam.
It relies on the capacities and competences of Authorising Officers by Delegation that are entrusted with management of EU funds, including the identification and mitigation of fraud risks. 
Zanaša se na zmogljivosti in pristojnosti odredbodajalcev na podlagi prenosa pooblastil, ki jim je zaupano upravljanje skladov EU, vključno z odkrivanjem in zmanjševanjem tveganj goljufij.
This is why these risks are assessed primarily at the level of Directorates-General. 
To je razlog, da se ta tveganja ocenjujejo predvsem na ravni generalnih direktoratov.
For the on-going update of the Commission’s Anti-Fraud Strategy (CAFS), the Commission is making use of the services' individual risk analyses, which OLAF has compiled into a qualitative corporate fraud risk assessment. 
Pri posodabljanju strategije Komisije za boj proti goljufijam, ki je v teku, Komisija uporablja posamezne analize tveganja, ki so jih pripravile njene službe, urad OLAF pa jih je zbral v kvalitativni interni oceni tveganja goljufij.
Commission services act in compliance with effective and efficient internal control, as required by Article 36(1) of the Financial Regulation, both in choosing analytical methods for their fraud risk assessment and in determining the anti-fraud controls that will be deployed to mitigate fraud risks. 
Službe Komisije ravnajo v skladu z učinkovito in uspešno notranjo kontrolo, kot se zahteva s členom 36(1) finančne uredbe, tako pri izbiri analitičnih metod za svojo oceno tveganja goljufij kot pri določanju kontrol za boj proti goljufijam, ki bodo uvedene za zmanjšanje tveganj goljufij.
That said, the Commission intends to reinforce OLAF’s analytical capabilities, which will, in due course, contribute to a refinement of fraud risk assessments (see the Commission’s replies to recommendations 1, 3.1 and 4). 
Ne glede na to namerava Komisija okrepiti analitične zmogljivosti urada OLAF, kar bo v doglednem času prispevalo k izpopolnitvi ocen tveganja goljufij (glej odgovore Komisije na priporočila 1, 3.1 in 4).
Some Commission services, in particular DG REGIO, use external sources as appropriate (e.g. Transparency International and DIGIWHIST). 
Nekatere službe Komisije, zlasti GD za regionalno in mestno politiko, po potrebi uporabljajo zunanje vire (npr. organizacijo Transparency International in DIGIWHIST).
Without a detailed analysis of the methodology used to establish the global fraud risk register of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, it is difficult for the Commission to assess its added value for protecting the Union's financial interests. 
Komisija brez podrobne analize metodologije, ki je bila uporabljena za vzpostavitev globalnega registra tveganj goljufij Pooblaščenega inštituta za javne finance in računovodstvo Združenega kraljestva (Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy), težko oceni njegovo dodano vrednost za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije.
Doubts in this respect are raised by the fact that the register assigns a significantly higher fraud risk to payroll fraud (41%) than to procurement fraud (32%).3 No comparable trend is reflected in OLAF’s investigations.4 46. 
Pomisleke v zvezi s tem vzbuja dejstvo, da se v registru precej večje tveganje goljufij pripisuje goljufijam pri osebnih dohodkih (41 %) kot goljufijam pri javnih naročilih (32 %)3. Preiskave urada OLAF ne kažejo podobnega trenda4. 46.
The Commission agrees, in general, that the analysis of fraud-related data could be strengthened (see Commission's reply to recommendation 1). 
Komisija se na splošno strinja, da bi bilo mogoče analizo podatkov v zvezi z goljufijami okrepiti (glej odgovor Komisije na priporočilo 1).
However, the Commission is not of the opinion that the suggested avenues of analysis are superior to assessment methods currently used by Commission services. 
Vendar pa ne ocenjuje, da so predlagani načini analize boljši od metod ocenjevanja, ki jih zdaj uporabljajo službe Komisije.
As concerns DG AGRI, EU bodies managing Common Agricultural Policy funds are closely followed by the audit services of DG AGRI to ensure they have the appropriate management and control systems in place. 
Kar zadeva GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, so organi EU, ki upravljajo sredstva v okviru skupne kmetijske politike, pod budnim očesom revizijskih služb GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, s čimer se zagotovi, da imajo vzpostavljene ustrezne upravljavske in nadzorne sisteme.
Through this exercise, beneficiaries are surveyed indirectly, too. 
V okviru tega se posredno nadzorujejo tudi upravičenci.
The assurance framework established by the Commission to ensure legality and regularity of expenditure minimises at the same time the risk of fraud. 
Z okvirom zagotovil, ki ga je Komisija vzpostavila za zagotovitev zakonitosti in pravilnosti izdatkov, se hkrati zmanjšuje tudi tveganje goljufij.
Regarding the causes of fraud, the Commission is considering intensifying work on profiling fraudsters targeting the EU budget, as one of the tasks of an enhanced analysis function as recommended by the ECA.. 48. 
Kar zadeva vzroke goljufij, Komisija razmišlja o okrepitvi prizadevanj za izdelavo profilov goljufov, katerih tarča je proračun EU, kot eni od nalog izboljšane funkcije analize, ki jo priporoča Evropsko računsko sodišče.
The “modus operandi” referred to by the ECA (i.e. the nature of fraud, such as artificially created conditions) is covered by OLAF’s analytical work. 
48. „Način delovanja“, ki ga navaja Evropsko računsko sodišče (tj. narava goljufije, kot so npr. umetno ustvarjeni pogoji), je zajet z analitičnim delom urada OLAF.
Because complex rules tend to be error and fraud prone, the Commission has proposed simplification of general and sectoral financial rules. 
Ker so kompleksna pravila dovzetna za napake in goljufije, je Komisija predlagala poenostavitev splošnih in sektorskih finančnih pravil.
Evidence shows that this is working for instance in reducing irregularities and fraud in Horizon 2020. 
Dokazi kažejo, da to na primer deluje pri zmanjševanju nepravilnosti in goljufij v okviru programa Obzorje 2020.
simplifies the rules on reimbursement of costs, promoting the use of the simplified cost options (lump-sums) and of forms of financing not linked to costs. 
S finančno uredbo iz leta 2018 se dodatno poenostavljajo pravila o povračilu stroškov, pri čemer se spodbuja uporaba poenostavljenih možnosti obračunavanja stroškov (pavšalni zneski) in oblik financiranja, ki niso povezane s stroški.
Box 2 The Commission shares the ECA’s concern. To prove artificial conditions, the strict conditions set out by the European Court of Justice need to be followed. 
Da bi dokazali umetne pogoje, je treba upoštevati stroge pogoje, kakor jih je določilo Sodišče Evropske unije.
It is vital to preserve legal certainty of beneficiaries who act in accordance with the applicable legislation. 
Nujno je treba ohraniti pravno varnost upravičencev, ki delujejo v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo.
Therefore, paying agencies can only refuse payment based on clearly established evidence, and not on mere suspicions. 
Zato lahko plačilne agencije zavrnejo plačilo samo na podlagi jasno ugotovljenih dokazov in ne le na podlagi sumov.
Accordingly, they often invest time and effort to gather conclusive evidence and subsequently launch recovery procedures. 49. 
V skladu s tem pogosto vložijo čas in trud v zbiranje trdnih dokazov ter naknadno uvedejo postopke izterjave.
The "opportunity for discretionary spending" referred to by the ECA is linked to the subsidiarity principle but not without limits: eligibility criteria and conditions must be agreed with the Commission and cannot be subsequently modified unilaterally. 
49. „Priložnost za porabo po lastni presoji“, ki jo navaja Evropsko računsko sodišče, je povezana z načelom subsidiarnosti, vendar ni neomejena: merila in pogoji upravičenosti morajo biti dogovorjeni s Komisijo ter jih pozneje enostransko ni mogoče spremeniti.
In that sense, spending is never fully discretionary. The "allowed" degree of discretionary spending is related only to certain areas of shared management, where Member States must formally designate authorities that will manage the funds and also have the obligation to put in place a Management and Control System (MCS) with adequate management verifications and an independent audit body. 
V tem smislu poraba ni nikoli popolnoma stvar lastne presoje. „Dovoljena“ stopnja porabe po lastni presoji je povezana samo z nekaterimi področji deljenega upravljanja, na katerih morajo države članice uradno imenovati organe, ki bodo upravljali sredstva ter imeli tudi obveznost, da z ustreznimi preverjanji upravljanja in neodvisnim revizijskim organom vzpostavijo sistem upravljanja in nadzora.
The Commission conducts audits (system audits and audits of operations) where risks are identified. 
Komisija opravlja revizije (revizije sistema in revizije postopkov), pri katerih se opredelijo tveganja.
Payments to programmes can be interrupted in cases of serious deficiencies to the MCS. 
Plačila za programe se lahko v primerih resnih pomanjkljivosti v sistemu upravljanja in nadzora prekinejo.
Therefore, the legal framework for shared management in the Programming Period 2014-2020 ensures that controls are in place at all levels, taking into due account the risks linked to discretionary spending. 
Zato pravni okvir za deljeno upravljanje v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 zagotavlja, da so kontrole vzpostavljene na vseh ravneh, pri čemer se ustrezno upoštevajo tveganja, povezana s porabo po lastni presoji.
Managing Authorities have some discretionary powers, but programme implementation is scrutinised by an Independent Audit Body and they remain subject to EU law, Commission/ECA audits and OLAF investigations. 
Organi upravljanja imajo nekatera pooblastila za odločanje po lastni presoji, vendar izvajanje programa preverja neodvisni revizijski organ, tako da zanje še naprej veljajo pravo EU, revizije Komisije/Evropskega računskega sodišča in preiskave urada OLAF.
Nevertheless, the Commission will consider the ECA's suggestion to analyse how discretion in EU co-financed programmes affects the risk of fraud. 
Komisija bo kljub temu obravnavala predlog Evropskega računskega sodišča, naj se analizira, kako pri programih, ki jih sofinancira EU, lastna presoja vpliva na tveganje goljufij.
Common reply to paragraphs 50-54: Strategic fraud risk management and fraud prevention are important objectives for the Commission. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke 50–54: Strateško obvladovanje tveganja goljufij in preprečevanje goljufij sta za Komisijo pomembna cilja.
It has put in place a decentralised model of financial management, where Authorising Officer by Delegation, e.g. Directors-General, are responsible for internal control, including risk management and fraud prevention. 
Vzpostavila je decentraliziran model finančnega upravljanja, po katerem so odredbodajalci na podlagi prenosa pooblastil, na primer generalni direktorji, odgovorni za notranji nadzor, vključno z obvladovanjem tveganj in preprečevanjem goljufij.
Since 2017, all Commission services are obliged to appoint a senior manager in charge of risk management, to support and advise the Authorising Officer by Delegation on matters of internal control, including fraud risk management. 
Od leta 2017 morajo vse službe Komisije imenovati višjega vodstvenega delavca, pristojnega za obvladovanje tveganj, ki odredbodajalcu na podlagi prenosa pooblastil pomaga in mu svetuje v zvezi z zadevami notranjega nadzora, vključno z obvladovanjem tveganja goljufij.
In addition, it should be noted that Member States also play an important role in the fraud risk management for the EU budget, in particular in the areas under shared management. 
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da imajo pri obvladovanju tveganja goljufij za proračun EU pomembno vlogo tudi države članice, zlasti na področjih v okviru deljenega upravljanja.
The Member of the Commission in charge of anti-fraud steers and puts forward initiatives to improve the fight against fraud, while the College of Commissioners takes overall political responsibility for the management of the EU budget. 
Član Komisije, pristojen za boj proti goljufijam, usmerja in vlaga pobude za izboljšanje boja proti goljufijam, medtem ko kolegij komisarjev nosi splošno politično odgovornost za upravljanje 11 proračuna EU.
Each Member of the Commission receives fraud-related information directly by the service under his or her responsibility and reports important cases to the College. 
Vsak član Komisije prejme informacije, povezane z goljufijami, neposredno od službe, za katero je odgovoren, in o pomembnih primerih poroča kolegiju.
The individual mission letters by the President of the Commission are committing each Commissioner to pay specific attention to sound financial management of EU funds which 11 reinforces the Commission's political commitment to apply the principle of zero tolerance for fraud and to systematically ensure the protection of the EU budget from fraud. 
Posamezne poslanice predsednika Komisije vsakega Komisarja zavezujejo, da namenja posebno pozornost dobremu finančnemu upravljanju sredstev EU, s čimer se krepi politična zaveza Komisije, da bo uporabljala načelo ničelne tolerance do goljufij in proračun EU sistematično ščitila pred goljufijami.
The Commission considers that OLAF could assume a stronger and more strategic role as a coordinator with regard to the anti-fraud policies of the Commission services and executive agencies. 
Komisija meni, da bi lahko urad OLAF prevzel večjo in bolj strateško vlogo kot koordinator v zvezi s politikami služb Komisije in izvajalskih agencij na področju boja proti goljufijam.
The Commission notes that Annex V is a simplified presentation of its governance model. 
Komisija navaja, da Priloga V vsebuje poenostavljeno predstavitev njenega modela upravljanja.
The Commission also notes that, in reality, its model of financial management differentiates between political and operational responsibilities. 
Opozarja tudi, da njen model finančnega upravljanja v resnici razlikuje med političnimi in operativnimi odgovornostmi.
The Commission takes the view that OLAF already has a role in providing an overview of anti-fraud actions and reporting on outputs. 
Komisija meni, da urad OLAF že ima vlogo pri zagotavljanju pregleda nad ukrepi za boj proti goljufijam in pri poročanju o izložkih.
Inter alia, OLAF is lead service for the design of the corporate anti-fraud strategy and coordinates its implementation. 
Med drugim je urad OLAF glavna služba za zasnovo interne strategije boja proti goljufijam in usklajuje njeno izvajanje.