natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
III We audited projects financed from IPA I in three major sectors: public administration reform (12 % of the total allocation), transport (18 %) and environment (16 %). 
III Sodišče je revidiralo projekte, financirane iz IPA I, v treh velikih sektorjih: reforma javne uprave (12 % skupnih dodeljenih sredstev), promet (18 %) in okolje (16 %).
We found that, despite the priority assigned to capacity-building by the Commission, relatively limited progress was made in strengthening the country’s administrative capacity during the audited period. 
Ugotovilo je, da je bil kljub prednosti, ki jo je gradnji zmogljivosti namenila Komisija, v revidiranem obdobju dosežen razmeroma skromen napredek pri krepitvi upravne zmogljivosti države.
The projects we audited generally delivered the planned outputs but these were often not fully exploited. 
Projekti, ki jih je revidiralo, so v glavnem dosegli načrtovane izložke, vendar ti pogosto niso bili v celoti izkoriščeni.
In some cases projects had limited impact and were not sustainable. 
V nekaterih primerih so imeli projekti skromen učinek in niso bili trajnostni.
IV All of the projects audited in the PAR sector included activities designed to strengthen administrative capacity but often did not effectively address many of the weaknesses. 
IV Vsi projekti, revidirani v sektorju reforme javne uprave, so zajemali dejavnosti, zasnovane za krepitev upravne zmogljivosti, vendar pogosto niso uspešno obravnavali mnogih slabosti.
For some key areas in which strong legislation already existed (internal control, the development of a professional, independent civil service) there was little assistance under IPA during the period audited and there was not sufficient progress on implementing that legislation. 
Za nekatera ključna področja, za katera je že obstajala trdna zakonodaja (notranji nadzor, razvoj profesionalnega in neodvisnega uradništva), v okviru IPA v revidiranem obdobju ni bilo veliko pomoči in pri izvajanju te zakonodaje ni bilo zadostnega napredka.
In other key areas (such as the fight against corruption and public procurement) IPA projects had little impact in the absence of active support from the national authorities. 
Na drugih ključnih področjih (kot sta boj proti korupciji in javno naročanje) projekti IPA niso imeli veliko učinka, ker ni bilo dejavne podpore nacionalnih organov.
VIn the transport and environment sectors few of the audited projects addressed capacity-building to bring alignment with the EU acquis. 
V sektorjih prometa in okolja je le malo revidiranih projektov obravnavalo gradnjo zmogljivosti zaradi uskladitve s pravnim redom EU.
While others aimed to strengthen administrative capacity through ‘learning by doing’, further examination revealed that the investments in infrastructure did not include activities clearly designed to directly support this objective. 
Čeprav so nekateri skušali okrepiti upravno zmogljivost z učenjem skozi prakso, je dodatna preučitev razkrila, da naložbe v infrastrukturo niso zajemale dejavnosti, nedvoumno zasnovanih za neposredno podporo temu cilju.
Executive summary 07 VI The audited projects did not always fit into a coherent, cohesive and coordinated approach towards strengthening administrative capacity. 
Povzetek 07 VI Revidirani projekti niso vedno tvorili povezanega, enotnega in usklajenega pristopa h krepitvi upravne zmogljivosti.
Some projects did not follow on from previous assistance in the same sector or were not adequately followed up with further support. 
Nekateri projekti niso bili nadaljevanje prejšnje pomoči v istem sektorju ali jim ni sledila ustrezna nadaljnja podpora.
There was often a gap of 4 years or more between establishing the need for assistance and the delivery of project results. 
Med ugotovitvijo potrebe po pomoči in dosego projektnih rezultatov so pogosto minila štiri leta ali več.
VII The Commission decentralised the management of 76 % of the IPA I allocation of funds to the national administration and supported the setting up and operation of structures to manage these funds. 
VII Komisija je decentralizirala upravljanje 76 % sredstev, ki so bila iz IPA I dodeljena nacionalni upravi, ter podpirala vzpostavitev in delovanje struktur za upravljanje teh sredstev.
This resulted in improved capacity in the parts of the public administration concerned. 
Zato se je zmogljivost v ustreznih delih javne uprave izboljšala.
However, we found that the experience of decentralising management presented an opportunity for capacity-building in the rest of the public administration which the Commission did not take up during the audited period. 
Vendar je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je izkušnja z decentralizacijo upravljanja pomenila priložnost za gradnjo zmogljivosti v preostanku javne uprave, ki pa je Komisija v revidiranem obdobju ni izkoristila.
VIII The mechanisms for political dialogue were well-suited to supporting reform in the country. 
VIII Mehanizmi za politični dialog so bili ustrezni za podpiranje reforme v državi.
The fact that overall administrative capacity did not improve significantly during the period audited was largely due to the insufficient political will of the national authorities to tackle some of the obstacles to strengthening administrative capacity. 
Za to, da se splošna upravna zmogljivost v revidiranem obdobju ni bistveno izboljšala, je bila v veliki meri kriva premajhna politična volja nacionalnih organov za odpravljanje nekaterih ovir za krepitev upravne zmogljivosti.
In addition, the leverage for the Commission to encourage reform, especially in sensitive areas, was greatly reduced during this period in the absence of the framework provided by accession negotiations. 
Poleg tega se je vpliv Komisije pri spodbujanju reforme, zlasti na občutljivih področjih, v tem obdobju močno zmanjšal, ker ni bilo okvira, ki ga zagotavljajo pogajanja o pristopu.
IX We make a number of recommendations in support of strengthening administrative capacity. 
IX Sodišče je izreklo več priporočil o podpori za krepitev upravne zmogljivosti.
Introduction 08 The road to accession 01 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the EU signed a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) in 2001, the first in the Western Balkans. 
Uvod 08 Pot do pristopa k EU 01 Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija je leta 2001 kot prva zahodnobal-kanska država podpisala stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum z EU.
At the Thessaloniki Summit in 2003, the European Union (EU) granted all countries of the Western Balkans1 a clear prospect of EU membership, subject to their meeting the Copenhagen criteria2 and the conditions of the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP)3. 
Leta 2003 je Evropska unija (EU) na solunskem vrhu vsem državam Zahodnega Balkana1 ponudila jasno možnost za članstvo v EU, če izpolnijo københavnska merila2 in pogoje stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega procesa3.
In 2005 the country formally became a full candidate for EU membership. 
Leta 2005 je država uradno postala polnopravna kandidatka za članstvo v EU.
02 By 2009 the country had successfully aligned many important parts of its national legislation with EU legislation. 
02 Do leta 2009 je država uspešno uskladila številne pomembne dele svoje nacionalne zakonodaje z zakonodajo EU.
The Commission acknowledged this progress and recommended opening formal accession negotiations. 
Komisija je ta napredek priznala in priporočila, naj se začnejo uradna pristopna pogajanja.
However, membership negotiations cannot start until the governments of all EU Member States agree in the form of a unanimous decision by the EU Council. 
Vendar se pogajanja o članstvu ne morejo začeti, dokler se s tem ne strinjajo vlade vseh držav članic EU, in sicer s sprejetjem s soglasnega sklepa Sveta EU.
Despite agreeing that the country had met the political criteria for opening accession negotiations, the Council did not take such a decision following the Commission’s 2009 recommendation. 
Čeprav se je Svet strinjal, da je država izpolnila politična merila za začetek pristopnih pogajanj, takega sklepa kljub priporočilu Komisije iz leta 2009 ni sprejel.
03 The Council continued to take no action despite positive recommendations delivered by the Commission in each of the next 5 years. Issues regarding the country’s official name4 and, more recently, relations with neighbours, have proven to be an impediment to reaching a decision. 
03 Kljub pozitivnim priporočilom Komisije v vsakem od naslednjih petih let Svet še naprej ni ukrepal. Vprašanja, povezana z uradnim imenom države4, in v zadnjem času njeni odnosi s sosedi so ovirali sprejetje sklepa.
The country’s formal road towards accession has been blocked for more than 6 years. 
Uradna pot države k pristopu je blokirana že več kot šest let.
In the meantime, it has seen many of the other Western Balkan nations catch up and even overtake it5. 
Medtem jo je dohitelo in celo prehitelo več drugih držav Zahodnega Balkana5.
04 In 2013 the country entered a period of political crisis and there was a breakdown of domestic political dialogue6 which exposed serious shortcomings in democratic governance. 
04 Leta 2013 se je v državi začelo obdobje politične krize in prišlo je do prekinitve domačega političnega dialoga6, ki je razkrila resne pomanjkljivosti pri demokra-tičnem upravljanju.
In 2015, intercepted communications suggesting breaches of fundamental rights, politicisation and corruption were released into the public domain7. 
Leta 2015 so v javnost prišle prestrežene komunikacije, ki so kazale na kršitve temeljnih pravic, politizacijo in korupcijo7.
The Commission and some Members of the European Parliament have been closely involved in facilitating a political agreement to overcome this crisis. 
Komisija in nekateri poslanci Evropskega parlamenta so bili tesno vključeni v omogočanje političnega sporazuma za prebroditev te krize.
1 The countries at that time were Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia and Montenegro. 
1 Te države so bile takrat Albanija, Bosna in Hercegovina, Hrvaška, nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija ter Srbija in Črna gora.
2 The Copenhagen criteria set by the European Council in June 1993 consist of: (a) politicalcriteria; (b) economic criteria; (c) theabilitytoassume the obligations of membership. 
2 Københavnska merila, ki jih je junija 1993 določil Evropski svet, sestavljajo: (a) političnamerila; (b) gospodarska merila; (c) sposobnostzaprevzem obveznosti članstva.
3 The SAP, the EU’s policy on the Western Balkans, was established with the aim of eventual EU membership. 
3 Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni proces je politika EU za Zahodni Balkan, vzpostavljena s ciljem morebitnega članstva v EU.
The western Balkan countries are involved in a progressive partnership with a view to stabilising the region and establishing a free-trade area. 
Države Zahodnega Balkana sodelujejo v progresivnem partnerstvu s ciljem stabilizacije regije in vzpostavitve območja proste trgovine.
4 This has been addressed through United Nations mediation since 1994. 
4 V zvezi s tem vprašanjem od leta 1994 poteka mediacija Združenih narodov.
5 Croatia is now an EU Member State. 
5 Hrvaška je zdaj država članica EU.
Montenegro, Serbia and Albania have become candidate countries for EU membership, and Montenegro and Serbia have opened accession negotiations. 
Črna gora, Srbija in Albanija so postale države kandidatke za članstvo v EU. Črna gora in Srbija sta začeli pristopna pogajanja.
6 The main opposition party boycotted parliament. 
6 Glavna opozicijska stranka je bojkotirala parlament.
7 See the introduction to the 2015 Progress Report (SWD(2015) 212 final of 10 November 2015). 
7 Glej uvod k Poročilu o napredku iz leta 2015, (SWD(2015) 212 final z dne 10. novembra 2015).
Introduction 09 05 In 2014 the Commission announced that there would be no new EU Member States before 20208. 
Uvod 09 05 Leta 2014 je Komisija objavila, da pred letom 2020 ne bo novih držav članic EU8.
This overall slow-down in the enlargement process was due both to the need for consolidation within the EU following the recent rounds of enlargement and to the challenges faced in integrating a region still emerging from violent conflict in the 1990s. 
Ta splošna upočasnitev procesa širitve je nastala zaradi potrebe po konsolidaciji znotraj EU po nedavnih širitvah in zaradi izzivov v zvezi z integracijo regije, ki si še ni opomogla po nasilnem konfliktu v 90-ih letih 20. stoletja.
See key dates shown at Annex I. The national context of reform 06 The Commission assists the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to enact reforms and prepare for membership of the EU. 
Glej ključne datume, prikazane v Prilogi I. Nacionalno ozadje reforme 06 Komisija pomaga nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji pri sprejemanju reform in pripravah na članstvo v EU.
The reform process consists of introducing and implementing national legislation which is aligned with EU legislation. 
Proces reform zajema uvajanje in izvajanje nacionalne zakonodaje, usklajene z zakonodajo EU.
The Commission helps to draft new legislation and to strengthen the administrative capacity to implement it. 
Komisija pomaga pripravljati novo zakonodajo in krepiti upravno zmogljivost za njeno izvajanje.
07 The Commission and other stakeholders have reported that, although the public administration of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is continuing to work towards integration with the EU, there is reduced commitment to reform from the national authorities at a higher level9. There is often a lack of will to engage in some of the significant financial investment which is necessary to make progress on reform, for example on environmental measures. 
07 Komisija in drugi deležniki so poročali, da si javna uprava nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije sicer še naprej prizadeva za povezovanje z EU, vendar se je zavezanost reformam pri nacionalnih organih na višjih ravneh zmanjšala.9 Pogosto primanjkuje volje za nekatere bistvene finančne naložbe, ki so potrebne za napredek pri reformi, na primer na področju okoljskih ukrepov.
There has also been inadequate political leadership to tackle sensitive areas such as the fight against corruption. 
Primanjkuje tudi ustreznega političnega vodstva za obravnavo občutljivih področij, kot je boj proti korupciji.
08 In the absence of formal accession negotiations, the Commission has used the chapters on which negotiations are usually based as a guide10 for assessing annual progress in the country11. Although pointing to weaknesses in administrative capacity, up to 2012 the Commission concluded that the overall reform process was generally proceeding well in the country. 
08 Ker ni uradnih pristopnih pogajanj, je Komisija uporabila poglavja, na katerih običajno temeljijo pogajanja, kot smernice10 za ocenjevanje letnega napredka v državi.11 Čeprav je opozorila na slabosti pri upravni zmogljivosti, je bil do leta 2012 njen zaključek, da splošni proces reform v državi dobro poteka.
In the 2013 report the Commission pointed to the failure to make progress in some areas and backsliding in others. 
V poročilu iz leta 2013 je opozorila, da se na nekaterih področjih ne dosega napredek, na nekaterih pa prihaja do nazadovanja.
The 2014 report made a more negative assessment and issued the following warning: ‘...The Commission urges the authorities to take decisive action to address concerns about increased politicisation and growing shortcomings with regard to the independence of the judiciary and freedom of expression so that its recommendation can be sustained in future years’12. 8 Opening Statement by the President of the European Commission to the European Parliament Plenary Session, Strasbourg, 15 July 2014. 
V poročilu iz leta 2014 je bila ocena bolj negativna in je vključevala opozorilo, da Komisija poziva organe k odločnemu ukrepanju za obravnavo zaskrbljenosti glede povečane politizacije ter vse večjih pomanjkljivosti pri neodvisnosti pravosodja in svobodi izražanja, da bo lahko v prihodnjih letih ponovila priporočilo.12 8 Uvodna izjava predsednika Evropske komisije na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta, Strasbourg, 15. julija 2014.
9 See 2015 Progress Report: ‘Strong political will is necessary to guarantee the independence of administration.’ (section 2.2), The capacity to effectively address [the fight against corruption] is currently being undermined by a lack of political will and political interference in the work of the relevant bodies, which is hampering their ability to act proactively and non-selectively, especially in high-level cases (section 2.3) and on Chapter 23: ‘The current lack of political will to tackle the remaining challenges at the highest level is holding back the capable administration from reaching its full effectiveness’. 
9 Glej Poročilo o napredku iz leta 2015: za jamčenje neodvisnosti uprave je potrebna močna politična volja (oddelek 2.2). Zmogljivost za uspešno obravnavo boja proti korupciji zdaj spodkopavata pomanjkanje politične volje in politično vmešavanje v delo ustreznih organov, ki ovira njihovo sposobnost za proaktivno in neselektivno delovanje, zlasti v zadevah na visoki ravni (oddelek 2.3).
10 The chapters of the acquis (currently 35) form the basis of the accession negotiations. 
10 Poglavja pravnega reda EU (zdaj jih je 35) so podlaga za pristopna pogajanja.
They correspond to the different areas of the acquis in which reforms are needed in order to meet accession conditions. 
Ustrezajo različnim področjem pravnega reda, na katerih je treba uvesti reforme, da se izpolnijo pogoji za pristop.
11 Without opening and closing them as it would if the accession process had already started. 
11 Ne da bi poglavja odprla in zaprla, kot bi bilo pri običajnem poteku pristopnega procesa.
12 2014 Progress Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, p. 
12 Poročilo o napredku nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije iz leta 2014, str.
Introduction 10 09 In its 2015 Progress Report, published in November 2015, the Commission repeated its recommendation to open accession negotiations with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 
Uvod 10 09 V Poročilu o napredku iz leta 2015, objavljenem novembra 2015, je Komisija znova priporočila začetek pristopnih pogajanj z nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo.
However, this positive recommendation was conditional on the successful implementation of the Przino Agreement13 and substantial progress in the implementation of the urgent reform priorities14. 10 Table 1 shows our summary of weaknesses in administrative capacity in some key areas of reform which were highlighted in the Commission’s 2011-2015 progress reports. 
Toda pogoj za to pozitivno priporočilo je, da se uspešno izvaja sporazum iz Pržina13 in doseže znaten napredek pri izvajanju nujnih prednostnih nalog na področju reform.14 10 V tabeli I je prikazan naš povzetek slabosti pri upravni zmogljivosti na nekaterih ključnih področjih reforme, ki so bile poudarjene v poročilih Komisije o napredku iz let 2011–2015.
13 The main four political parties signed the Przino Agreement in June 2015. 
13 Sporazum iz Pržina so junija 2015 podpisale glavne štiri politične stranke.
This agreement consisted of conditions to be met including free and fair elections and the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the issues surrounding or arising from the interception of communications. 
Z njim je bil sklenjen dogovor o pogojih, ki jih je treba izpolniti, vključno s svobodnimi in pravičnimi volitvami ter imenovanjem posebnega tožilca za preiskavo vprašanj, ki so povezana s prestrezanjem komunikacij ali ki so posledica prestrezanja.
See also paragraph 65 and Annex I. 14 In June 2015 the Commission issued ‘Urgent reform priorities for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’ drawn up on the basis of the findings of the Senior Experts’ Group. 
Glej tudi odstavek 65 in Prilogo I. 14 Junija 2015 je Komisija objavila nujne prednostne naloge na področju reform za nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, sestavljene na podlagi ugotovitev skupine izkušenih strokovnjakov.
It contains a list of urgent reform priorities to be fulfilled by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the fields of rule of law and fundamental rights, de-politicisation of the public administration, freedom of expression and electoral reform. 
Vsebujejo seznam nujnih prednostnih nalog, ki jih mora izpolniti nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija na področjih pravne države in temeljnih pravic, depolitizacije javne uprave, svobode izražanja ter volilne reforme.
Introduction 11 Assessments of administrative capacity in the annual progress reports (2011-2015) for the areas audited Chapter Institutions 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5 Public procurement Ministry of Economy, Concessions and Private–Public Partnerships Unit State Appeals Commission 14 Transport policy Road/State Transport Inspectorate Rail Safety Authority Air/Civil Aviation Agency 21 Trans-European Networks Institutions involved in construction 22 Regional policy and coordination of structural instruments National Fund, Central Financing and Contracting Department and line ministries Programming Monitoring and evaluation Financial management, control and audit 23 Judiciary and fundamental rights Institutions involved in implementing anti-corruption policy Courts dealing with high-level cases 27 Environment and climate change Regulating bodies (horizontal legislation) Bodies involved in air quality Bodies involved in waste management Bodies involved in enforcing legislation Administrative capacity still weak/limited and needs substantial/urgent improvement. 
Uvod 11 Ocene upravne zmogljivosti v letnih poročilih o napredku (obdobje 2011–2015) za revidirana področja Poglavje Institucije 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5 Javno naročanje ministrstvo za gospodarstvo, enota za koncesije in javno-zasebna partnerstva državna komisija za pritožbe 14 Prometna politika ceste/državni prometni inšpektorat organ za varnost v železniškem prometu zračni promet/agencija za civilno letalstvo 21 Vseevropska omrežja institucije, ki sodelujejo pri gradnji 22 Regionalna politika in usklajevanje strukturnih instrumentov nacionalni sklad, centralna finančna in pogodbena enota ter resorna ministrstva priprava programov spremljanje in vrednotenje finančno poslovodenje, nadzor in revizija 23 Pravosodje in temeljne pravice institucije, ki sodelujejo pri izvajanju protikorupcijske politike sodišča, ki obravnavajo primere na visoki ravni 27 Okolje in podnebne spremembe regulativni organi (horizontalna zakonodaja) organi, ki se ukvarjajo s kakovostjo zraka organi, ki se ukvarjajo z ravnanjem z odpadki organi, ki se ukvarjajo z izvrševanjem zakonodaje Upravna zmogljivost je še vedno šibka/skromna in jo je treba znatno/nujno izboljšati.
Administrative capacity has increased but still needs further improvement. 
Upravna zmogljivost se je povečala, vendar so potrebne dodatne izboljšave.
Administrative capacity has increased: no need for further improvement. 
Upravna zmogljivost se je povečala, dodatne izboljšave niso potrebne.
Source: ECA using European Commission progress reports. 
Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi poročil Evropske komisije o napredku.
Introduction 12 EU pre-accession financial assistance 11 The EU provides financial and technical help for the enlargement countries (the Western Balkans and Turkey) by means of the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA)15. 
Uvod 12 Predpristopna finančna pomoč EU 11 EU z instrumentom za predpristopno pomoč (IPA)15 zagotavlja finančno in tehnično pomoč državam, ki se pripravljajo za pristop (Zahodnemu Balkanu in Turčiji).
IPA I covered the period 2007-2013 with a total allocation of 10 billion euros, of which 615 million (6 %) was for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 
Instrument IPA I je zajemal obdobje 2007–2013. Iz njega je bilo dodeljenih skupaj 10 milijard EUR, od tega 615 milijonov (6 %) za nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo.