natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the 2014-2020 programme period, the implementation of the national broadband plan is under the responsibility of a single entity, Infratel, a company wholly-owned by the Economic Development Ministry. 
V programskem obdobju 2014–2020 je izvajanje nacionalnega načrta za širokopasovne povezave v pristojnosti enega samega subjekta, in sicer podjetja Infratel, ki je v celoti v lasti ministrstva za gospodarski razvoj.
Infratel is in charge of implementing and monitoring the national broadband plan and this includes managing the tendering process. 
Podjetje je odgovorno za izvajanje in spremljanje nacionalnega načrta za širokopasovne povezave, to pa vključuje tudi upravljanje razpisnega postopka.
Infratel is also coordinating the funding from the national and, regional sources, and from ERDF and EAFRD. 
Poleg tega usklajuje financiranje iz nacionalnih in regionalnih virov ter iz ESRR in EKSRP.
The different sources of financial support are thus contributing in a coordinated manner to achieving the broadband targets. 
Različni viri finančne podpore tako na usklajen način prispevajo k doseganju ciljnih vrednosti v zvezi s širokopasovnimi povezavami.
In Hungary, the government issued its national broadband plan in 2014 (National Infocommunication Strategy) and the Superfast Internet Programme (SZIP) was launched in 2015 to ensure fast broadband deployment. 
Na Madžarskem je vlada leta 2014 objavila nacionalni načrt za širokopasovne povezave (nacionalna strategija za infokomunikacije), leta 2015 pa se je začel izvajati program za super hitri internet (SZIP), ki naj bi zagotovil uvedbo hitrih širokopasovnih povezav.
For the broadband infrastructure deployment, the ERDF and national funding are centrally managed for the 2014-2020 programme period. 
Za uvedbo širokopasovne infrastrukture se financiranje iz ESRR in nacionalno financiranje za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 upravljata centralno.
In Poland, we found that the coordination of funding sources improved. 
Na Poljskem je Sodišče ugotovilo, da se je usklajevanje virov financiranja izboljšalo.
The ERDF was used together with national funding in the 2007-2013 programme period. 
V programskem obdobju 2007–2013 so se sredstva ESRR uporabljala skupaj z nacionalnim financiranjem.
While demarcation lines were clearly set-up between national and regional OPs, there were delays in notifying the aid scheme for backbone infrastructure in each regional OP, delaying in turn the implementation of the ‘last mile’. 
Med nacionalnimi in regionalnimi operativnimi programi so bile sicer razmejitve jasno določene, vendar so bile sheme pomoči za hrbtenično infrastrukturo in posamezne regionalne operativne programe priglašene z zamudami, kar je upočasnilo tudi 43 izvedbo „dostopne povezave”.
In 2014-2020, since the support is channelled under single ERDF OP, we did not find overlapping problems. 
V obdobju 2014–2020 se je podpora zagotavljala v okviru enotnega operativnega programa ESRR, zato Sodišče ni ugotovilo težav s prekrivanjem.
In Germany, we found a lack of coordination in the use of the various funding sources. 
V Nemčiji je Sodišče ugotovilo pomanjkanje usklajevanja pri uporabi različnih virov financiranja.
Responsibility for implementation of broadband deployment is at regional (Länder) and municipal level, while the financing support is at national and regional level, resulting in a fragmented broadband infrastructure. 
Odgovornost za izvajanje uvedbe širokopasovnih povezav je na regionalni (zvezne dežele) in občinski ravni, medtem ko je odgovornost za finančno podporo na nacionalni in regionalni ravni, kar vodi v razdrobljenost širokopasovne infrastrukture.
In addition to the EU funds made available through two EAFRD programmes and eight ERDF programmes, and federal funding from the Digital Agenda 2014-2017 national plan, 16 Länder and the federal investment bank40 have their own funding programmes (paragraph 56). 
Poleg finančnih sredstev EU, ki so na voljo v okviru dveh programov EKSRP in osmih programov ESRR, in zveznega financiranja iz nacionalnega načrta digitalne agende za obdobje 2014– 2017 ima 16 zveznih dežel in zvezna investicijska banka40 na voljo tudi lastne programe financiranja (odstavek 56).
At the end of December 2017, although more than 3 billion euro had been allocated to regional governments, no projects had been finalized. 
Konec decembra 2017 je bilo regionalnim vladam že dodeljenih več kot 3 milijarde EUR, kljub temu pa noben projekt še ni bil zaključen.
Coordination across programme periods in Poland 76. 
Usklajevanje med različnimi programskimi obdobji na Poljskem 76.
In Poland, we found that the authorities failed to ensure a coordinated use of funds in the previous and current programme period. 
Na Poljskem je Sodišče ugotovilo, da organom v predhodnem in tekočem programskem obdobju ni uspelo zagotoviti usklajene uporabe sredstev.
In the 2007-2013 programme period, 240 million euro of EU funding was used to build broadband infrastructure in under-served areas in five different regions in eastern Poland, with a total project cost of 347 million euro. 
V programskem obdobju 2007–2013 je bilo porabljenih 240 milijonov EUR v okviru financiranja EU za izgradnjo širokopasovne infrastrukture na slabo pokritih območjih v petih različnih regijah na vzhodu Poljske, pri čemer so skupni stroški projekta znašali 347 milijonov EUR.
The projects were treated as major projects and approved directly by the Commission. 
Projekti so bili obravnavani kot veliki projekti, ki jih je odobrila neposredno Komisija.
They were also subject to a State aid decision by the Commission. 
Bili so tudi predmet sklepa Komisije o državni pomoči.
The national and regional authorities expected that the last mile connections would be carried out by private operators directly, or that private operators would be supported by funding from the Digital Poland OP in the 2014-2020 programme period. 
Nacionalni in regionalni organi so pričakovali, da bo dostopovne povezave uvedel zasebni operater neposredno ali da bo zasebnim operaterjem zagotovljena podpora iz financiranja v okviru operativnega programa Digitalna Poljska v programskem obdobju 2014–2020.
However, the calls for proposals of the Digital Poland OP did not incentivize bidders to connect to the backbone infrastructure financed in the 2007-2013 period. 
Vendar pa razpisi za zbiranje predlogov v okviru operativnega programa Digitalna Poljska niso spodbudili ponudnikov k priključitvi na hrbtenično infrastrukturo, ki je bila financirana v obdobju 2007–2013.
At the time of the audit in June 2017, less than 1 % of backbone capacity was being used. 
V času revizije junija 2017 se je uporabljal manj kot 1 % zmogljivosti 44 40 Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW).
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 79. 
ZAKLJUČEK IN PRIPOROČILA 79.
We conclude that, despite progress, not all broadband targets will be achieved by 2020. 
Sodišče ugotavlja, da do leta 2020 vse ciljne vrednosti v zvezi s širokopasovnimi povezavami kljub napredku ne bodo dosežene.
All Member States achieved the basic broadband coverage target by 2016. 
Vse države članice so do leta 2016 dosegle ciljno vrednost glede pokritosti z osnovnimi širokopasovnimi povezavami.
Two of the five examined Member States may achieve the 30 Mbps coverage target by 2020 but rural areas remain problematic in most Member States. 
Dve od petih preučenih držav članic bi lahko do leta 2020 dosegli ciljno vrednost glede pokritosti s povezavami hitrosti najmanj 30 Mb/s, toda podeželska območja ostajajo problematična v večini držav članic.
Finally, while none of the examined Member States is likely to achieve the take-up target by 2020, three of the examined Member States may, based on their current plans, be in a good position to achieve the 2025 targets. 
Do leta 2020 verjetno nobena od pregledanih držav članic ne bo dosegla ciljne vrednosti glede naročnin, vendar pa bi tri od preučenih držav članic glede na svoje sedanje načrte lahko bile na dobri poti, da dosežejo ciljne vrednosti za leto 2025.
The support provided by the Commission was assessed as positive by Member States, but its monitoring is uncoordinated across Directorates-General (paragraphs 16 to 34). 
Države članice so podporo Komisije pozitivno ocenile, toda njeno spremljanje ni usklajeno med generalnimi direktorati (odstavki 16 do 34).
Although all Member States developed broadband strategies, some were published later than the 2012 deadline and there were weaknesses in the Member State strategies we examined. 
Strategije za širokopasovne povezave so sicer pripravile vse države članice, toda nekatere so jih objavile po roku, ki je bil leta 2012, poleg tega pa so bile pri strategijah držav članic, ki jih je Sodišče preučilo, ugotovljene slabosti.
Strategies were not always consistent with the EU 2020 targets: while some set targets that were more demanding than those in the EU 2020 strategy, none of the Member States we examined included in their strategy a national target relating to Target 3, take-up by 50 % of households to ultra-fast broadband (paragraphs 36 to 40). 
Strategije niso bile vedno skladne s ciljnimi vrednostmi EU za leto 2020: nekatere ciljne vrednosti držav članic so bile sicer zahtevnejše od tistih v strategiji EU za leto 2020, vendar pa nobena od držav članic, ki smo jih preučili, v svojo strategijo ni vključila nacionalnih ciljnih vrednosti v zvezi s ciljno vrednostjo 3, tj. da se 50 % gospodinjstev naroči na ultra hitre širokopasovne povezave (odstavki 36 do 40).
Under the ex ante conditionality arrangements governing the ESI Funds for 2014-2020, Member States are required to have national or regional plans in place with details on planned investments. 
Na podlagi ureditve predhodnih pogojenosti, ki veljajo za sklade ESI za obdobje 2014–2020, morajo države članice pripraviti nacionalne ali regionalne načrte s podrobnostmi o načrtovanih naložbah.
The Commission assessed that these conditions had been fulfilled for all of the Member States examined, but we found an example where a key element was missing: Germany had not developed data of sufficient quality to form the basis of a comprehensive investment plan, although the quality of mapping data has improved in recent years (paragraph 41). 
Komisija je za vse preučene države članice ocenila, da so bili ti pogoji izpolnjeni, toda Sodišče je odkrilo primer, v katerem je manjkal eden ključnih elementov: Nemčija ni pripravila dovolj kakovostnih podatkov, na katerih bi lahko temeljil celovit naložbeni načrt, čeprav se je kakovost podatkov o kartiranju v zadnjih letih izboljšala (odstavek 41).
Member States’ decisions on broadband investments are affected by their existing legacy infrastructure. 
Na odločitve držav članic o naložbah v širokopasovne povezave vplivajo njihove že obstoječe infrastrukture.
Unlike Poland and Hungary, the legacy of the telephone systems means that Italy, Ireland and Germany had well-developed copper infrastructure. 
Za razliko od Poljske in Madžarske imajo Italija, Irska in Nemčija dobro zapuščino telefonskih sistemov, kar pomeni, da imajo dobro razvito infrastrukturo z 45
Italy and Ireland designed their investments to incentivise bidders to move away from copper to fibre, capable of much faster speeds. Germany, in contrast, is making extensive use of ‘vectoring’ 43 
Italija in Irska so svoje naložbe zasnovale tako, da te spodbujajo ponudnike k prehodu z bakrenih vodov na optične kable, ki lahko zagotavljajo veliko večje hitrosti, medtem ko Nemčija široko uporablja tehnologijo vektorizacije.
technology. This has the advantage of increasing speed over copper, but it does not offer the future proof speed of fibre and also potentially limits the scope for competition (paragraphs 45 to 48). 
Prednost te rešitve je povečanje hitrosti prek bakrenih vodov, vendar ta ne ponuja hitrosti, kakršne zagotavljajo optični kabli in bodo primerne tudi v prihodnosti, lahko pa tudi omejuje možnosti za konkurenco (odstavki 45 do 48).
These related to the financing, competitive and legal environments. 
Ti so bili povezani s financiranjem ter konkurenčnim in pravnim okoljem.
In terms of financing, of the Member States examined, only Germany did not identify the financial support needed from the public sector, the ‘financing gap’. 
Kar zadeva financiranje, od preučenih držav članic le Nemčija ni opredelila finančne podpore, ki naj bi jo zagotovil javni sektor, torej „vrzeli v financiranju”.
While Germany has made over 8 billion euro available, from a mix of sources, it is not clear whether this will be sufficient. 
Nemčija je sicer temu namenila več kot 8 milijard EUR iz mešanice virov, vendar ni jasno, ali bo to zadostovalo.
Of the other four Member States, only Hungary and Italy allocated sufficient public resources to achieve Target 2, fast broadband for all households. 
Od preostalih štirih držav članic sta le Madžarska in Italija zagotovili dovolj javnih sredstev za dosego ciljne vrednosti 2, torej hitrih širokopasovnih povezav za vsa gospodinjstva.
In Poland, for example, two of the financial tools specified in its national plan were not in place, and potential new sources of funding had not been identified (paragraphs 52 to 57). 
Na Poljskem na primer dva od finančnih instrumentov, določenih v nacionalnem načrtu, nista bila vzpostavljena, potencialni novi viri financiranja pa niso bili opredeljeni (odstavki 52 do 57).
The EIB has a range of loans and financial instruments, depending on project size and level of risk. 
EIB ima na voljo vrsto posojil in finančnih instrumentov, ki so odvisni od velikosti projekta in stopnje tveganja.
The European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI) is designed to finance more risky, larger projects. 
Evropski sklad za strateške naložbe (EFSI) je namenjen za financiranje bolj tveganih, večjih projektov.
We examined a 500 million euro loan made by the EIB from this fund for a broadband project. 
Sodišče je preučilo posojilo v višini 500 milijonov EUR, ki ga je EIB dodelila iz tega sklada za širokopasovni projekt.
This project did not focus on broadband deployment in white and grey areas and had already benefited from ERDF support of nearly 400 million euro. 
Projekt ni bil osredotočen na uvedbo širokopasovnih povezav na belih in sivih lisah in je že pred tem prejel podporo ESRR v višini skoraj 400 milijonov EUR.
The loan was therefore not in line with the objective of financing more risky broadband projects (paragraphs 58 to 60). 
Posojilo zato ni bilo skladno s ciljem financiranja bolj tveganih širokopasovnih projektov (odstavki 58 do 60).
The legal and competitive environment put in place by Hungary, Italy and Poland was adequate. 
Pravno in konkurenčno okolje, ki so ga uvedle Madžarska, Italija in Poljska, je bilo ustrezno.
In Ireland, limitations on the power of the national regulatory authority to enforce its decisions might reduce the scope for effective competition, while the competitive environment in Germany was affected by a range of issues. Germany was also affected by the fact that operators were not legally bound by commitments they had previously given regarding their investment plans, potentially leading to further delays in broadband provision in areas where competition was limited. 
Na Irskem bi lahko omejitve pristojnosti nacionalnega regulativnega organa za uveljavljanje njegovih odločitev zmanjšale možnosti za uspešno konkurenco, v Nemčiji pa je na konkurenčno okolje vplivala vrsta problemov, med drugim tudi to, da zaveze v zvezi z naložbenimi načrti, ki so jih operaterji prej dali, zanje niso bile pravno zavezujoče, kar bi lahko privedlo do nadaljnjih zamud pri zagotavljanju širokopasovnih povezav na območjih z 46
In 2013 the Commission updated its State aid guidelines on broadband. 
Komisija je leta 2013 posodobila svoje smernice o državni pomoči za širokopasovne povezave.
However, we found that some Member States are interpreting the guidelines in a way which may limit the public funding they make available for broadband in areas where the coverage is already at 30 Mbps (paragraphs 63 to 69). 44 
Toda Sodišče je ugotovilo, da si nekatere države članice te smernice razlagajo na način, ki bi lahko omejeval javno financiranje, ki ga dajejo na voljo za širokopasovne povezave na območjih, na katerih je že zdaj zagotovljena pokritost s hitrostjo 30 Mb/s (odstavki 63 do 69).
Given the range of different funding sources available to Member States, and the long time periods involved, effective coordination is key to successful investment in broadband. 
Glede na raznolikost virov financiranja, ki so na voljo državam članicam, in na dolge časovne okvire, ki so potrebni, je za uspešnost naložb v širokopasovne povezave ključnega pomena uspešno usklajevanje.
In Ireland, Italy and Hungary we found that appropriate levels of coordination supported broadband provision and ensured economies of scale. 
Sodišče je na Irskem, v Italiji in na Madžarskem ugotovilo, da je bila uvedba širokopasovnih povezav podprta z usklajevanjem, ki je bilo na ustrezni ravni in je zagotavljalo ekonomijo obsega.
This was not the case in Germany. 
To pa ne velja za Nemčijo.
Finally, Poland spent some 240 million euro in the 2007-2013 programme period on broadband infrastructure in the east of the country. 
Poljska je v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 porabila približno 240 milijonov EUR za širokopasovno infrastrukturo na vzhodu države.
However, there was no incentive for operators subsequently to use this infrastructure, less than 1 % of which was being used at the time of our audit in June 2017, with no evidence of action taken by the Polish authorities to address this issue (paragraphs 76 to 78). 
Vendar ni bilo pozneje nobene spodbude za operaterje za uporabo te infrastrukture, od katere se je v času naše revizije junija 2017 uporabljal manj kot 1 %. Poleg tega ni bilo tudi dokazov o tem, da so poljski organi sprejeli ukrepe za obravnavo tega vprašanja (odstavki 76 do 78).
Our recommendations are grouped in three areas: strategic planning, the regulatory environment, and fostering competition. 
Priporočila, ki jih Sodišče izreka, so razdeljena na tri področja, in sicer strateško načrtovanje, regulativno okolje in spodbujanje konkurence.
45 Strategic planning (1) The Commission should request all Member States, based on current progress against the three EU 2020 targets, to highlight those areas where these targets may not be achieved by 2020 and to include, where possible, remedial action. 
47 Strateško načrtovanje (1) Komisija naj od vseh držav članic zahteva, naj na podlagi doslej doseženega napredka v zvezi s ciljnimi vrednostmi EU 2020 poudarijo tista področja, na katerih te ciljne vrednosti morda ne bodo dosežene do leta 2020, ter, kadar je to mogoče, vključijo tudi popravljalne ukrepe.
Target implementation date: September 2018. 
Ciljni rok za izvedbo: september 2018.
(2) All Member States should, as part of preparations for the post 2020 programme period, develop revised plans to show how they intend to meet those relevant high level targets for broadband after 2020 whether the Gigabit Society targets for 2025 or others. 
(2) Vse države članice naj v okviru priprav na programsko obdobje po letu 2020 pripravijo revidirane načrte, v katerih bo ponazorjeno, kako nameravajo doseči te ustrezne ciljne vrednosti na visoki ravni za širokopasovne povezave po letu 2020 – bodisi ciljne vrednosti gigabitne družbe za leto 2025 ali druge.
Target implementation date: December 2019. 
Ciljni rok za izvedbo: december 2019.
(3) The Commission should, for the post 2020 programme period, develop common, consistent output and result indicators for use in Member States’ operational programmes enabling progress against relevant high level objectives to be tracked while taking account of the need to limit the number of indicators. 
48 (3) Komisija naj za programsko obdobje po letu 2020 oblikuje skupne in skladne kazalnike izložkov in rezultatov, ki se bodo uporabljali v operativnih programih držav članic in omogočali napredek glede na ustrezne cilje na visoki ravni, ki jih je treba uresničiti, pri čemer naj upošteva to, da je treba omejiti število kazalnikov.
46 Regulatory environment (4) All Member States should review the mandate of their National Regulatory Authorities in accordance with the revised EU regulatory framework for telecoms, with a view to ensuring that they are able to impose their recommendations and remedies (including penalties for non-compliance) on operators. 
Regulativni okvir (4) Vse države članice naj pregledajo pooblastila nacionalnih regulativnih organov skladno z spremenjenim regulativnim okvirjem EU za telekomunikacijska podjetja, da se zagotovi, da ti organi lahko operaterjem naložijo obveznost izvrševanja svojih priporočil in popravljalnih ukrepov (vključno s kaznimi za neizpolnjevanje obveznosti) v zvezi z operaterji.
(5) The Commission should clarify for Member States the application of the State aid guidelines with regard to the 100 Mbps and the Gigabit society targets. 
(5) Komisija naj državam članicam pojasni uporabo smernic o državni pomoči v zvezi s hitrostjo 100 Mb/s in ciljnimi vrednostmi gigabitne družbe.
Target implementation date: December 2018. 
Ciljni rok za izvedbo: december 2018.
Fostering competition through financing (6) The Commission should support the Member States in incentivizing the set-up of wholesale open access networks in white and grey areas through developing an adequate legal framework, guidance and guidelines. 
Spodbujanje konkurence s financiranjem (6) Komisija naj podpira države članice pri spodbujanju vzpostavitve grosističnega odprtega dostopovnega omrežja na belih in sivih lisah, in sicer z razvojem ustreznega pravnega okvira, navodil in smernic.
This type of network should facilitate an adequate competitive environment, leading to better service provision for users. 
Ta vrsta omrežja bi morala olajšati ustrezno konkurenčno okolje in s tem zagotoviti boljše storitve za uporabnike.
Target implementation date: by June 2020. 
Ciljni rok za izvedbo: junij 2020.
(7) The Commission should disseminate best practices, issue guidance and guidelines to incentivize the aggregation of smaller projects, where appropriate, by authorities in Member States, with a view to achieving economies of scale. 
(7) Komisija naj razširja najboljše prakse ter objavi navodila in smernice za spodbujanje organov držav članic k združevanju manjših projektov, kadar je to primerno, da se doseže ekonomija obsega.
(8) The EIB should focus its support through the EFSI and CEBF on small and medium size projects in white and grey areas in line with the aim of supporting riskier projects. 
(8) EIB naj svojo podporo v okviru EFSI in CEBF osredotoči na majhne in srednje projekte na belih in sivih lisah skladno s ciljem podpirati bolj tvegane projekte.
In addition, the output and result indicators at project completion should include, when relevant, the number of premises covered and connected in white and grey areas, and an indication of the broadband speeds achievable. 
Poleg tega naj kazalniki izložkov in rezultatov ob zaključku projektov, kadar je to ustrezno, zajemajo število objektov na belih in sivih lisah, katerim so bile zagotovljene pokritost in povezave, ter navedbo hitrosti širokopasovne povezave, kadar je to mogoče.
This Report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mrs Iliana IVANOVA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 21 March 2018. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat II, ki ga vodi članica Evropskega Računskega sodišča Iliana IVANOVA, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 21. marca 2018.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President 47 
Za Evropsko računsko sodišče Klaus-Heiner LEHNE Predsednik 49
30 MBPS COVERAGE MAPS OF EUROPE Europe: Overall NGA broadband coverage, 2016 ANNEX 1 2 
ZEMLJEVIDA EVROPE S POKRITOSTJO S POVEZAVAMI HITROSTI 30 MB/S Evropa: Skupna pokritost s širokopasovnimi povezavami naslednje generacije, 2016 PRILOGA 1
REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS "BROADBAND IN THE EU MEMBER STATES: DESPITE PROGRESS, NOT ALL THE EUROPE 2020 TARGETS WILL BE MET" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VI. 
2