natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recommendation 3 As from 2011, the Agriculture and Rural Development DG and the Health and Consumers DG have agreed that the latter will include PDO/PGI-related issues in its annual audit programmes in full cooperation with the Agriculture and Rural Development DG and following the same rigorous prioritisation process applied to other areas under its remit. 
Priporočilo 3 GD AGRI in GD SANCO sta se dogovorila, da bo slednji od leta 2011 vključil vprašanja v zvezi z ZOP/ZGO v svoje letne revizijske programe, ob polnem sodelovanju z GD AGRI in v skladu z enako strogim postopkom opredeljevanja prednostnih nalog, kot ga uporablja za druga področja v svoji pristojnosti.
In addition, specific working arrangements are currently being detailed, including information on multiannual national control plans (MANCPs) and annual reports (ARs). 
Poleg tega se trenutno podrobno določajo posebne oblike dela, vključno z informacijami o večletnih nacionalnih načrtih nadzora in letnih poročilih.
The scheme is primarily an intellectual property protection scheme. 
Shema je predvsem shema zaščite intelektualne lastnine.
The appropriate instruments, legal means are there and producers are invited to join the scheme on a voluntary basis. 
Zagotavlja ustrezne instrumente in pravna sredstva, proizvajalci pa so pozvani, da se shemi pridružijo prostovoljno.
Producers have shown a clear interest in the scheme, as shown by the significant number of product names registered (above 1 000), accounting for a market value of 14,5 billion euro (in 2008). 
Proizvajalci so izrazili jasen interes za shemo, kar dokazuje veliko število registriranih imen proizvodov (nad 1 000), ki so leta 2008 dosegla tržno vrednost 14,5 milijarde EUR.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION The Member States that have joined the EU since 2004 are still picking up on speed in relation to the scheme. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Države članice, ki so k EU pristopile po letu 2004, si v zvezi s shemo še vedno prizadevajo dohiteti ostale.
Therefore, trade fairs, thematic international exhibitions and/or preparation of guides for applicants for geographical indications (PDO or PGI) are important tools for attracting potential applicants. 
Zato so trgovinski sejmi, tematske mednarodne razstave in/ ali oblikovanje priročnikov za vložnike o geografskih označbah (ZOP ali ZGO) pomembna orodja za privabljanje morebitnih vložnikov.
Raising awareness among consumers takes considerable time especially since the use of the logos has only been mandatory since 1 May 2009. 
Za krepitev ozaveščenosti potrošnikov bo potrebnega precej časa, zlasti ker je uporaba logotipa obvezna šele od 1. maja 2009.
Also, as explained under point V, the Commission believes having put into place a coherent set of actions to increase consumer awareness. 
Poleg tega, kot je opisano v točki V, je Komisija sprejela usklajen sklop ukrepov za povečanje ozaveščenosti potrošnikov.
A change of attitude will take time and the Commission also agrees that there is more potential and will reflect, also within the ongoing reform of its promotion policy, on how to increase further consumer awareness. 
Za spremembo odnosa je potreben čas, pri čemer se Komisija tudi strinja, da je možnosti še več, zato bo tudi v okviru tekoče reforme promocijske politike preučila, kako dodatno povečati ozaveščenost potrošnikov.
The EU food quality policy has been one of the priority actions in the last three years for the information measures on agricultural products. 
Politika EU na področju kakovosti hrane je zadnja tri leta ena od prednostnih nalog ukrepov za informiranje o kmetijskih proizvodih.
It shall be noted that only Member States have the option to propose promotion schemes for geographical indications. 
Navesti je treba, da imajo samo države članice možnost predlagati promocijske sheme za geografske označbe.
However, the Commission is promoting or participating in different types of information measures targeting geographical indications. 
Vendar pa Komisija promovira različne vrste ukrepov za informiranje ali sodeluje pri teh ukrepih, ki so usmerjeni na geografske označbe.
See the reply to point 55 for a non-exhaustive list of these activities. 
Za neizčrpen seznam teh dejavnosti glej odgovor k točki 55.
See also the reply to Recommendation 4. 
Glej tudi odgovor k priporočilu 4.
Recommendation 4 As part of the ongoing reflexion on the reform of the regime on information and promotion of agricultural products, the Commission will consider appropriate ways to further enhance the promotion of quality schemes. 
Priporočilo 4 Komisija bo v okviru tekočega razmišljanja o reformi ureditve ukrepov za informiranje o kmetijskih proizvodih in njihovo promocijo preučila ustrezne načine za dodatno okrepitev promocije shem za kakovost.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2011 — 44 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-267-5 doi:10.2865/75364 45 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2011 – 44 str. – 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-282-8 doi:10.2865/81264 45
THE EUROPEAN GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS SCHEME AIMS TO PROTECT THE NAMES OF PRODUCTS WHOSE CHARACTERISTICS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA IN WHICH THEY ARE PRODUCED, AND PROVIDES A POTENTIAL ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOR FARMERS AND FOOD PRODUCERS. 
EVROPSKA SHEMA GEOGRAFSKIH OZNAČB JE NAMENJENA ZAŠČITI IMEN PROIZVODOV, KATERIH ZNAČILNOSTI SO POVEZANE Z GEOGRAFSKIM OBMOČJEM, NA KATEREM SO PRIDELANI, TER PRINAŠA GOSPODARSKE MOŽNOSTI ZA KMETE IN PROIZVAJALCE HRANE.
THE AUDIT CONCLUDES THAT CLARIFICATION IS NEEDED ON A NUMBER OF ISSUES CONCERNING THE SCHEME’S CONTROL SYSTEM, ESPECIALLY CHECKS OF PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS AND DISALLOWED PRACTICES, AND THAT A CLEAR STRATEGY IS LACKING TO RAISE THE AWARENESS OF BOTH PRODUCERS AND CONSUMERS. 
PRI REVIZIJI JE BILO UGOTOVLJENO, DA JE TREBA RAZJASNITI VEČ ZADEV V ZVEZI Z NADZORNIM SISTEMOM SHEME, ZLASTI S PREGLEDI SKLADNOSTI PROIZVODOV Z NJIHOVIMI SPECIFIKACIJAMI IN PREGLEDI V ZVEZI S PREPOVEDANIMI PRAKSAMI, TER DA NI JASNE STRATEGIJE ZA POVEČANJE OZAVEŠČENOSTI PROIZVAJALCEV IN POTROŠNIKOV.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-11-008-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJ-AB-11-008-SL-C
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS EN HAVE EU MEASURES CONTRIBUTED TO ADAPTING THE CAPACITY OF THE FISHING FLEETS TO AVAILABLE FISHING OPPORTUNITIES? 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE SL ALI SO UKREPI EU PRISPEVALI K PRILAGODITVI ZMOGLJIVOSTI RIBOLOVNIH FLOT RAZPOLOŽLJIVIM RIBOLOVNIM MOŽNOSTIM?
Special Report No 12 2011 ISSN 1831-0834 
Posebno poročilo št.
Special Report No 12 2011 HAVE EU MEASURES CONTRIBUTED TO ADAPTING THE CAPACITY OF THE FISHING FLEETS TO AVAILABLE FISHING OPPORTUNITIES? (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 12 2011 ALI SO UKREPI EU PRISPEVALI K PRILAGODITVI ZMOGLJIVOSTI RIBOLOVNIH FLOT RAZPOLOŽLJIVIM RIBOLOVNIM MOŽNOSTIM? (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Fax +352 4398-46410 e-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Special Report No 12 2011 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011 ISBN 978-92-9237-355-9 doi:10.2865/20007 © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2011 ISBN 978-92-9237-370-2 doi:10.2865/24367 © Evropska unija, 2011 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
3 Paragraph I–VII 1–13 1–8 9–13 14–18 19–73 20–33 21–22 23 24–25 26–33 34–73 36–37 38–40 41–42 43–47 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS GLOSSARY SUMMARY INTRODUCTION THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY (CFP) AND FISHING FLEET OVERCAPACITY EU EFFORTS TO REDUCE FISHING OVERCAPACITY AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH OBSERVATIONS UNCLEAR FRAMEWORK INADEQUATE DEFINITION OF FISHING CAPACITY FLEET CAPACITY CEILINGS BECOMING INCREASINGLY IRRELEVANT FISHING OVERCAPACITY HAS NOT BEEN DEFINED AND QUANTIFIED INADEQUATE RULES FOR THE TREATMENT OF FISHING RIGHTS WHEN FISHING VESSELS ARE DECOMMISSIONED WITH PUBLIC AID POOR DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION SIGNIFICANT DELAYS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EFF BY THE MEMBER STATES WEAK FISHING EFFORT ADJUSTMENT PLANS (FEAPS) WEAK PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES FUNDING PROJECTS ON BOARD WHICH MAY INCREASE THE ABILITY TO CATCH FISH Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
3 KAZALO Odstavek KRATICE I–VII 1–13 1–8 9–13 14–18 19–73 20–33 21–22 23 24–25 26–33 34–73 36–37 38–40 41–42 43–47 GLOSAR POVZETEK UVOD SKUPNA RIBIŠKA POLITIKA (SRP) IN PRESEŽNA ZMOGLJIVOST RIBOLOVNE FLOTE PRIZADEVANJA EU ZA ZMANJŠANJE PRESEŽNE RIBOLOVNE ZMOGLJIVOSTI OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP OPAŽANJA NEJASEN OKVIR NEUSTREZNA OPREDELITEV RIBOLOVNE ZMOGLJIVOSTI ZGORNJE MEJE ZMOGLJIVOSTI FLOTE POSTAJAJO ČEDALJE MANJ POMEMBNE PRESEŽNA RIBOLOVNA ZMOGLJIVOST NI BILA OPREDELJENA IN KOLIČINSKO DOLOČENA NEUSTREZNA PRAVILA ZA OBRAVNAVANJE RIBOLOVNIH PRAVIC, KADAR SE RIBIŠKA PLOVILA UMAKNEJO IZ OBRATOVANJA Z JAVNO POMOČJO SLABA ZASNOVA IN IZVAJANJE PRECEJŠNJE ZAMUDE PRI IZVRŠEVANJU EVROPSKEGA SKLADA ZA RIBIŠTVO V DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH ŠIBKI NAČRTI ZA PRILAGAJANJE RIBOLOVNEGA NAPORA (FEAP) ŠIBKI KAZALNIKI SMOTRNOSTI POSLOVANJA V OPERATIVNIH PROGRAMIH FINANCIRANJE PROJEKTOV NALOŽB V RIBIŠKA PLOVILA, KI LAHKO POVEČAJO RIBOLOVNE ZMOŽNOSTI Posebno poročilo št.
5 ABBREVIATIONS ACFA: Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture CFP: common fisheries policy EEZ: exclusive economic zone EFF: European Fisheries Fund FAO: the UN’s Food and Agricultural Organisation FAS: fleet adaptation scheme FEAP: fishing effort adjustment plan GT: gross tonnage ICES: International Council for the Exploration of the Seas IUU: illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing kW: kilowatts MAGP: multiannual guidance programme MSY: maximum sustainable yield OECD: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OP: operational programme STECF: Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries TACs: total allowable catches UNCLOS: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim? 5 KRATICE ACFA: Svetovalni odbor za ribištvo in ribogojstvo BT: bruto tonaža ESR: Evropski sklad za ribištvo FAO: Organizacija ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo FAS: načrt za prilagoditev flote FEAP: načrt za prilagajanje ribolovnega napora ICES: Mednarodni svet za raziskovanje morja IEC: izključna ekonomska cona IUU: nezakoniti, neprijavljeni in neregulirani ribolov kW: kilovat MSY: največji trajnostni donos OECD: Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj OP: operativni program SRP: skupna ribiška politika STECF: Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo TAC: celotni dovoljeni ulov UNCLOS: Konvencija Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu VLUP: večletni usmerjevalni program Posebno poročilo št.
6 GLOSSARY EU-10: The 10 Member States which joined the EU in 2004. 
EU-10: deset držav članic, ki so se pridružile EU leta 2004.
EU-12: The 12 Member States of the EU in 1992. 
EU-12: dvanajst držav članic, ki so sestavljale EU leta 1992.
EU-15: The 15 Member States of the EU in 1995. 
EU-15: petnajst držav članic, ki so sestavljale EU leta 1995.
Fishing effort adjustment plan (FEAP): Public aid for decommissioning fishing vessels is granted under the European Fisheries Fund in the context of FEAPs prepared by Member States. 
Načrt za prilagajanje ribolovnega napora (FEAP): javna pomoč za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja se dodeli iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo v okviru FEAP, ki jih pripravijo države članice.
An FEAP justifies measures for decommissioning specific types of fishing vessels — for example — cod recovery plans passed by the Council reduced fishing opportunities for cod, and several Member States’ FEAPs referred to these plans when targeting decommissioning schemes on cod fisheries. 
V FEAP so utemeljeni ukrepi za umik določenih vrst ribiških plovil iz obratovanja, na primer, zaradi načrtov za obnovo trske, ki jih je sprejel Svet, so se zmanjšale ribolovne možnosti za trsko in več držav članic se je na to sklicevalo v svojih FEAP, ko so se usmerjale v sheme za umik plovil za ribolov trske iz obratovanja.
Fishing mortality: Fishing mortality is the fraction of a fish stock that is removed each year because of fishing activities. 
Največji trajnostni donos (MSY): največji letni donos določenega ribjega staleža, ki ga je mogoče uloviti vsako leto, ne da bi to ogrozilo ribje staleže.
Fish stock: A fish stock can be considered as the mass of a fishery resource. 
Ribji stalež: ribji stalež pomeni skupno maso ribolovnega vira.
Such stocks are usually identified by their location. 
Takšni staleži se običajno ugotavljajo po njihovi lokaciji.
They can be, but are not always, genetically discrete from other stocks. 
Lahko so genetsko različni od drugih staležev, vendar niso vedno.
Maximum sustainable yield (MSY): The maximum yield of a specified fish stock that may be fished year after year without harming the fish stocks. 
Ribolovna umrljivost: ribolovna umrljivost je delež ribjega staleža, ki se vsako leto odstrani zaradi ribolovnih dejavnosti.
2 Source: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament ‘Implementing sustainability in EU fisheries through maximum sustainable yield’ (COM(2006) 360 final of 4 July 2006). 
1 Vir: Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu „Zagotovitev trajnosti v ribištvu EU z največjim trajnostnim donosom“, COM(2006) 360 konč. z dne 4.7.2006.
Safe biological limits: Safe biological limits for a fish stock are defined by a minimum safe stock size and a maximum fishing mortality rate. 
Varne biološke meje: varne biološke meje za ribji stalež so opredeljene z minimalno varno velikostjo staleža in maksimalno stopnjo ribolovne umrljivosti.
The stock size is measured in terms of ‘spawning stock biomass’ (SSB) which represents the total weight of spawning fish each year. 
Velikost staleža se meri po „biomasi drstilnega sta-leža“ (SSB), ki predstavlja vsakoletno skupno težo rib v času drstenja.
If the stock is either below the minimum safe SSB or above the maximum safe fishing mortality rate, the stock is said to be outside safe biological limits3. 
Če je stalež manjši od minimalne varne SSB ali večji od maksimalne varne stopnje ribolovne umrljivosti, pomeni, da je stalež zunaj varnih bioloških meja3, minimalne varne SSB ali večji od maksimalne varne stopnje ribolovne umrljivosti.
3 Source: International Council for the Exploration of the Seas. 7 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
3 Vir: Mednarodni svet za raziskovanje morja. 7 Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
8 SUMMARY I. The common fisheries policy (CFP) aims to promote sustainable fishing. 
8 POVZETEK I. Cilj skupne ribiške politike (SRP) je spodbujanje trajnostnega ribolova.
This implies a balance between fish resources and the fishing fleet in order to avoid overexploitation of fish stocks. 
To pomeni ravnovesje med ribolovnimi viri in ribolovno floto, da se prepreči pretirano izkoriščanje ribjih staležev.
For many years there has been a problem of overcapacity of the fishing fleet. 
Presežna zmogljivost ribolovne flote je že dolgo problem.
This undermines both the sustainability of fish stocks and the long-term viability of the fishing sector. 
To ogroža tako trajnost ribjih staležev kot dolgoročno zmožnost preživetja ribiškega sektorja.
The reduction of fishing overcapacity has been a recurrent theme in previous reforms of the CFP. Nevertheless measures taken to date to reduce fishing overcapacity by adapting the fishing fleet to fishing resources have been unsuccessful. 
Zmanjšanje presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti je bila ponavljajoča se tema pri vseh prejšnjih reformah SRP, vendar kljub temu doslej sprejeti ukrepi za zmanjšanje presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti s prilagajanjem ribolovne flote ribolovnim virom niso bili uspešni.
The Court examined the framework for the measures to reduce fishing overcapacity and examined how these measures are designed and implemented by the Commission and the Member States. 
Sodišče je preučilo okvir za ukrepe za zmanjšanje presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti ter kako Komisija in države članice načrtujejo in izvajajo te ukrepe.
The Court found important weaknesses in the framework: (a) the existing definitions of fishing capacity did not adequately reflect the ability of vessels to catch fish; (b) fleet capacity ceilings had little real effect on adapting fishing capacity of the fleet to fishing opportunities; (c) fishing overcapacity had not been defined or quantified; (d) the ability to transfer fishing rights had not been considered. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Sodišče je v tem okviru odkrilo pomembne slabosti: (a) obstoječe opredelitve ribolovne zmogljivosti niso ustrezno odražale dejanskih ribolovnih zmožnosti plovil; (b) zgornje meje zmogljivosti flot so imele malo dejanskega učinka na prilagajanje ribolovne zmogljivosti flote ribolovnim možnostim; (c) presežna ribolovna zmogljivost ni bila opredeljena ali količinsko določena; (d) možnost prenosa ribolovnih pravic ni bila upoštevana. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
The Court recommends the Commission to take the initiative to develop actions to effectively reduce overcapacity of the fishing fleet, to address the above weaknesses. 
Sodišče Komisiji priporoča, naj prevzame pobudo za pripravo ukrepov za uspešno zmanjšanje presežne zmogljivosti ribolovne flote, da se odpravijo navedene slabosti.
9 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 10 INTRODUCTION THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY (CFP) AND FISHING FLEET OVERCAPACITY 1. 
12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim? 10 UVOD SKUPNA RIBIŠKA POLITIKA (SRP) IN PRESEŽNA ZMOGLJIVOST RIBOLOVNE FLOTE 1.
The CFP4 aims to promote sustainable fishing. The CFP thus includes measures to avoid overfishing and to limit the size of the fishing fleet. 
Cilj SRP4 je spodbujati trajnostni ribolov, zato SRP vključuje ukrepe za preprečevanje prelova in omejitev velikosti ribolovne flote.
In its April 2009 Green Paper5 on the reform of the CFP, the Commission recognised that the 2002 reform had not achieved this objective and attributed this to chronic overcapacity of the fishing fleets. 
Komisija je v svoji zeleni knjigi5 o reformi skupne ribiške politike iz aprila 2009 priznala, da reforma iz leta 2002 ni dosegla tega cilja in to pripisala kronični presežni zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot.
The Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 3/1993 showed that fishing overcapacity was already a significant problem 20 years ago. 
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 3/1993 je pokazalo, da je bila presežna ribolovna zmogljivost velik problem že pred 20 leti.
Some of the issues raised by the report are still relevant today6. 
Nekatera vprašanja, obravnavana v poročilu, so še danes relevantna6.
The Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 7/20077 concluded that fishing fleet overcapacity was encouraging overfishing and was not being effectively reduced or accurately reported on by Member States. 
7/20077 prišlo do zaključka, da je presežna zmogljivost ribolovne flote spodbujala prelov in ni bila ustrezno zmanjšana niti niso države članice natančno poročale o njej.
In addition, improvements in fishing technology were increasing the ability of the fleets to catch fish. 
Poleg tega so izboljšanja ribolovne tehnologije povečala dejanske ribolovne zmožnosti flot.
Fishing is one of the few activities where rights of access are often not formally valued (in contrast to farming or mining, for example). 
Ribolov je ena od redkih dejavnosti, kjer pravice do dostopa pogosto niso formalno ovrednotene (v nasprotju s kmetijstvom ali rudarstvom, na primer).
This can encourage fishers to overexploit resources and imperil their sustainability over the long term. 
To lahko ribiče spodbuja k pretiranemu izkoriščanju virov in dolgoročno ogrozi njihovo trajnost.
In its April 2009 Green Paper, the Commission estimated that 88 % of fish stocks were being fished at unsustainable levels and that of these stocks, 30 % were outside safe biological limits. 
Komisija je v svoji zeleni knjigi iz aprila 2009 ocenila, da je raven ribolova pri 88 % ribjih staležev netrajnostna in da je 30 % teh staležev zunaj varnih bioloških meja.
The UN’s Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO)8, the Commission9, governmental and scientific sources10 have frequently referred to the inherent risk of overfishing; and international law re-quires11 states to manage fisheries sustainably and reduce fishing overcapacity. 
Organizacija ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO)8, Komisija9, vladni in strokovni viri10 so se pogosto sklicevali na pripadajoče tveganje prelova, mednarodno pravo pa zahteva11, da morajo države trajnostno upravljati ribolov in zmanjšati presežno ribolovno zmogljivost.
4 Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy (OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 
2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike (UL L 358, 31.12.2002, str.
5 Green Paper on the reform of the common fisheries policy (COM(2009) 163 final of 22 April 2009). 
5 Zelena knjiga o reformi skupne ribiške politike, COM(2009) 163 konč. z dne 22. 4.
6 For example, the level of overcapacity of the fishing fleet was estimated at 40 % and aid for vessel decommissioning schemes was not sufficiently targeted. 
6 Na primer, stopnja presežne zmogljivosti ribolovne flote je bila ocenjena na 40 %, pomoč za sheme umika ribiških plovil iz obratovanja pa ni bila dovolj ciljno usmerjena.
7 Following the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 7/2007 a new control regulation came into force in 2010 (Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 
7/2007 je začela leta 2010 veljati nova uredba o nadzoru (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike (UL L 343, 22.12.2009, str.
8 For example, FAO fisheries circular 994 of 2004 ’Measuring and appraising capacity in fisheries. 
8 Na primer okrožnica FAO o ribolovu št. 994 iz leta 2004 „Merjenje in ocenjevanje ribolovnih zmogljivosti.
Framework, analytical tools and data aggregation’. 
Okvir, analitična orodja in združevanje podatkov“.
9 Commission staff working document on rights-based management tools in fisheries (SEC(2007) 247 of 26 February 2007). 
9 Delovni dokument Komisije o upravljavskih orodjih na podlagi pravic v ribištvu, SEC(2007) 247 z dne 26.2.2007.
10 Forexample,M.SissenwineandD.Symes,’Reflectionsonthecommonfisheriespolicy’,reporttotheEuropeanCommission,July2007. 
10 Naprimer,Sissenwine,M.inSymes,D.,„Razmislekioskupniribiškipolitiki“–poročiloEvropskikomisiji,julij2007.