natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The imprecision with which TA was cast in the regulations for 2007–13 al‐ lowed managing authorities to exclude it from this essential aspect of sound financial management. 
Nedoločnost tehnične pomoči v uredbah za obdobje 2007–2013 je omogočila organom upravljanja, da jo izločijo iz tega bistvenega vidika dobrega finančnega poslovodenja.
Because the bulk of TA spending is not operational, it is largely considered to be annual expenditure and did not appear in the common monitoring and evaluation framework. 
Ker večina porabe za tehnično pomoč ni operativna, večinoma šteje za letne odhodke in se ni pojavila v skupnem okviru spremljanja in vrednotenja.
As a result, it is character‐ ised by inadequate multiannual plan‐ ning and lacks a proper needs assess‐ ment, leading to imprecise objectives and no performance‐oriented moni‐ toring and evaluation (paragraphs 60 to 75). 
Posledično je zanjo značilno, da je večletno načrtovanje neustrezno in da ni ustrezne ocene potreb, zaradi česar so cilji nenatančni ter ni spremljanja in vrednotenja s poudarkom na smotrnosti poslovanja (odstavki 60 do 75).
Conclusions and recommendations 36 92 By not defining its own TA needs as part of a performance framework, and by not insisting that the Member States do likewise, the Commission has deprived itself of a tool for asses‐ sing the global impact of TA spending and targeting funding where it will be most beneficial. 
Zaključki in priporočila 36 92 Ker Komisija ni opredelila svojih potreb po tehnični pomoči kot del okvira smotrnosti poslovanja in ker ni vztrajala, da to storijo države članice, ni imela orodja za ocenjevanje skupnega učinka porabe za tehnično pomoč in usmerjanje financiranja tja, kjer bi bilo najbolj koristno.
The potential effec‐ tiveness of TA funding is thus severely compromised (paragraphs 76 to 78). 
Zato je potencialna uspešnost financiranja v okviru tehnične pomoči resno ogrožena (odstavki 76 do 78).
93 The Court found that the arrange‐ ments for networking afforded greater compatibility with the elements of a performance framework, through more precise guidelines as to the uses of TA funding and a clear distinction between what is operational and what is not, together with a ceiling on man‐ agement spending by the Member States (paragraphs 79 to 82). 
93 Sodišče je ugotovilo, da ureditve za mreženje omogočajo večjo združljivost z elementi okvira smotrnosti poslovanja, ker so pri njih smernice za uporabo financiranja v okviru tehnične pomoči natančnejše, razločevanje med operativnim in neoperativnim jasno in ker je določena zgornja meja za porabo držav članic za upravljanje (odstavki 79 do 82).
Recommendation 4 The Commission and the Member States should establish a suitable performance framework for TA fund‐ ing. 
Priporočilo 4 Komisija in države članice naj vzpostavijo ustrezen okvir smotrnosti poslovanja za financiranje v okviru tehnične pomoči.
In particular, the TA needs of the Commission and of the Member States should be properly assessed and there should be a mechanism in place to set objectives and measure progress towards them, which would in turn enhance accountability and make it possible to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of spending. 
Zlasti je treba ustrezno oceniti potrebe Komisije in držav članic po tehnični pomoči in vzpostaviti mehanizem za določanje ciljev in merjenje napredka pri njihovem doseganju, kar bi nato okrepilo odgovornost in omogočilo izboljšanje uspešnosti in učinkovitosti porabe.
This Report was adopted by Chamber I, headed by Mrs Rasa BUDBERGYTĖ, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 11 March 2015. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat I, ki ga vodi ga. Rasa BUDBERGYTĖ, članica Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 11. marca 2015.
2 For the 2014–20 period, flexibility (Pillar I transfers) not yet included. 
2 Za obdobje 2014–2020 še ni vključena prožnost (prenosi v okviru prvega stebra).
3 Excluding Croatia, which joined the EU in 2013 so had no EAFRD expenditure for 2007–13; for 2014–20 its planned EAFRD budget is 2 026 mil‐ lion euro, including 55 million euro TA. Annex 
3 Z izjemo Hrvaške, ki se je EU pridružila leta 2013, zato v obdobju 2007–2013 ni imela odhodkov EKSRP; njen načrtovani proračun za EKSRP za obdobje 2014–2020 znaša 2 026 milijonov EUR, vključno s 55 milijoni EUR v tehnični pomoči. Priloga
Reply of the 38 Commission Executive summary IV The Commission considers that Article 5 of Regula‐ tion (EC) No 1290/2005 provides the single clear legal reference for both EAGF and EAFRD at Com‐ mission level and/or on its behalf. 
Odgovori 38 Komisije Povzetek IV Komisija meni, da člen 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 zagotavlja enotno jasno pravno podlago za EKJS in EKSRP na ravni Komisije in/ali v njenem imenu.
For the new programming period, technical assis‐ tance (TA) at the level of the Member States is defined under Article 59 of Regulation 1303/2013. 
Za novo programsko obdobje je tehnična pomoč na ravni držav članic opredeljena v členu 59 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
The freedom of choice resulting from the regulatory flexibility is needed to cope with the large variety of needs encountered by national and regional authorities. 
Svoboda izbire, ki izhaja iz regulativne prožnosti, je potrebna za obvladovanje veliko različnih potreb, s katerimi se srečujejo nacionalni in regionalni organi.
Capacity‐building is very much linked to certain types of costs such as administrative costs or IT tools. 
Krepitev zmogljivosti je močno povezana z določeno vrsto stroškov, kot so administrativni stroški ali orodja informacijske tehnologije.
Expenditure financed through TA is directly linked to the preparation, implementation and evaluation of the rural development pro‐ grammes (RDPs). 
Odhodki, financirani s tehnično pomočjo, so neposredno povezani s pripravo, izvajanjem in vrednotenjem programov razvoja podeželja.
As regards the 2014–20 programming period, the Commission has presented comprehensive guidelines to the Member States and provided policy lines to desk officers in order to streamline approaches in the negotiation of new RDPs. 
Za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 je Komisija državam članicam predstavila izčrpne smernice in referentom zagotovila smernice glede politik, da bi racionalizirala pristope pri pogajanjih o novih programih razvoja podeželja.
V Member States must ensure that all the rural development measures they intend to implement are verifiable and controllable. 
V Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da so vsi ukrepi za razvoj podeželja, ki jih nameravajo izvajati, preverljivi in da jih je mogoče nadzorovati.
To this end Member States shall define control arrangements that give them reasonable assurance that eligibility criteria and other commitments are respected (Article 48, Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006). 
V ta namen države članice opredelijo ureditev nadzora, ki jim nudi razumno zagotovilo o spoštovanju meril upravičenosti in drugih obveznosti (člen 48 Uredbe (ES) št. 1974/2006).
For the 2014–20 programming period, TA will be subject to administrative and on‐the‐spot checks (Article 62, Regulation (EC) No 809/2014) improving the level of assurance in `terms of eligibility of the expenditure. 
Za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 bo tehnična pomoč predmet upravnih pregledov in pregledov na kraju samem (člen 62 Uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014), s čimer se bo izboljšala raven zanesljivosti v smislu upravičenosti odhodkov.
TA expenditure must be traceable and resources financed therewith should be identifiable through sound accounting practices. 
Odhodki za tehnično pomoč morajo biti sledljivi, sredstva, ki se z njimi financirajo, pa morajo biti opredeljiva prek dobrih računovodskih praks.
The same principle applies to other expenditure, beneficiaries and operations that could be financed under other EU funds or public support in general. 
Enako načelo velja za druge odhodke, upravičence in dejavnosti, ki bi se lahko financirali iz drugih sredstev EU ali z javno podporo na splošno.
VI Member States have the obligation to provide infor‐ mation in the annual progress report on the quality and effectiveness of the programme implementa‐ tion, including the use of TA (Annex VII, Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006). 
VI Države članice morajo v letnem poročilu o napredku zagotoviti informacije o kakovosti in učinkovitosti izvajanja programov, vključno z uporabo tehnične pomoči (Priloga VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 1974/2006).
TA expenditure contributes to a smooth implemen‐ tation of the programmes, which ultimately ben‐ efits beneficiaries. 
Odhodki za tehnično pomoč prispevajo k nemote-nemu izvajanju programov, kar je nazadnje koristno tudi za upravičence.
VII TA contributes to the implementation, monitor‐ ing, control and evaluation of the RDPs. 
VII Tehnična pomoč prispeva k izvajanju, spremljanju, nadziranju in vrednotenju programov razvoja podeželja.
Only the synthesis of ex post evaluations of the RDPs will be able to demonstrate the contribution of TA to the general CAP objectives. 
Samo s povzetkom naknadnih vrednotenj programov razvoja podeželja bo mogoče dokazati, kako pomemben je prispevek tehnične pomoči k splošnim ciljem SKP.
The legislator decided to grant flexibility to Mem‐ ber States in the use of TA funds. 
Zakonodajalec se je odločil, da bo državam članicam omogočil prožnost pri uporabi sredstev za tehnično pomoč.
VII First recommendation The Commission accepts this recommendation and will further develop guidance in this regard. 
VII Prvo priporočilo Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in bo v zvezi s tem nadalje razvila smernice.
VII Second recommendation The Commission cannot accept this recom‐ mendation. 
VII Drugo priporočilo Komisija tega priporočila ne more sprejeti.
It considers that IT maintenance is an operational activity linked to the update and development of the systems. 
Meni, da je vzdrževanje informacijske tehnologije operativna dejavnost, povezana s posodobitvijo in razvojem sistemov.
In accordance with the Commission’s ESIF budgetary guidelines, dated 16 May 2014, for the shared management pro‐ grammes on the use of the operational and the non‐operational (administrative) TA in the case of IT and audit expenditure, all types of IT costs, whether related to IT development or IT maintenance, should always be charged in the same budget line as their respective IT development costs. 
V skladu s proračunskimi smernicami Komisije o evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladih z dne 16. maja 2014 za programe deljenega upravljanja o uporabi operativne in neoperativne (administrativne) tehnične pomoči bi morale biti v primeru odhodkov za informacijsko tehnologijo in revidiranje vse vrste stroškov informacijske tehnologije, povezanih z razvojem ali vzdrževanjem informacijske tehnologije, vedno knjižene v isti proračunski vrstici kot ustrezni stroški razvoja informacijske tehnologije.
This approach strengthens the budgetary discipline and consistency in all shared management areas of the Commission’s budget. 
Ta pristop krepi proračunsko disciplino in skladnost na vseh področjih proračuna Komisije, na katerih se uporablja deljeno upravljanje.
VII Third recommendation The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
VII Tretje priporočilo Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
Reply of the Commission 39 In the medium term, the Commission will request more detailed information within the current reporting systems in order to improve the monitor‐ ing of the type of costs incurred (i.e. administrative and operational costs) under the TA budget. 
Odgovori Komisije 39 Srednjeročno bo Komisija zahtevala podrobnejše informacije v okviru sedanjih sistemov poročanja, da bi izboljšala spremljanje vrste nastalih stroškov (tj. administrativnih in operativnih stroškov) v proračunu za tehnično pomoč.
VII Fourth recommendation The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
VII Četrto priporočilo Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission will encourage Member States to use adequate indicators for the monitoring of TA expenditure, although it will not make it compulsory. 
Države članice bo spodbujala k uporabi ustreznih kazalnikov za spremljanje odhodkov za tehnično pomoč, čeprav uporaba ne bo obvezna.
Introduction 13 The volume of TA spending is planned according to identified relevant needs. 
Uvod 13 Obseg porabe za tehnično pomoč je načrtovan v skladu z ustreznimi opredeljenimi potrebami.
For example, Article 8(c) (vi) of Regulation (EC) No 1305/2014 introduces the requirement for the managing authorities to ensure adequate advisory capacity on regulatory require‐ ments and actions related to innovation, a fact which might have triggered additional correspond‐ ing needs in terms of TA. 
Na primer, člen 8(c)(vi) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2014 uvaja zahtevo, da organi upravljanja zagotovijo ustrezno svetovanje o regulativnih zahtevah in ukrepih, povezanih z inovacijami, kar je morda sprožilo ustrezne dodatne potrebe v smislu tehnične pomoči.
The Commission has streamlined the approach towards TA in all ESI funds, establishing common legal provisions applicable to all. 
Komisija je racionalizirala pristop k tehnični pomoči pri vseh evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladih z vzpostavitvijo skupnih pravnih določb, ki veljajo za vse.
This provision (Article 59, Regulation (EC) No 1303/2013) slightly widens the scope of the expenditure eligible for support, including communication, networking, complaint resolution and audit activities, which were not used for the definition of TA in the previ‐ ous rural development legal framework. 
Ta določba (člen 59 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013) nekoliko razširja obseg odhodkov, upravičenih do podpore, vključno s komunicira-njem, mreženjem, reševanjem sporov in dejavnostmi revizije, ki niso bili uporabljeni za opredelitev tehnične pomoči v prejšnjem pravnem okviru za razvoj podeželja.
16 As regards Pillar I, all commitments have to be made within the budget year concerned and, barring the rare cases of allowed carry‐overs from one budget year to the next, they lapse at the end of that year. 
16 Kar zadeva prvi steber, morajo biti vse obveznosti prevzete v zadevnem proračunskem letu in zapadejo ob koncu zadevnega leta, razen v redkih primerih dovoljenih prenosov iz enega proračunskega leta v drugo.
However, payments can be made in the course of more than one budget year. 
Vendar se lahko plačila izvedejo v več kot enem proračunskem letu.
As regards Pillar II, the outcome of the use of the planned TA funds is not fully known yet, as the Member States may submit expenditure declara‐ tions throughout 2015. 
Kar zadeva drugi steber, rezultat uporabe načrtovanih sredstev za tehnično pomoč še ni v celoti znan, saj lahko države članice predložijo izjave o odhodkih v celotnem letu 2015.
There is a wide variation among the Member States in relation to the propor‐ tion of the rural development allocation they plan to use for TA. Observations 24 As regards Pillar I, funding of Member States’ administrative costs is excluded in the EAGF. 
Med državami članicami obstajajo velike razlike glede deleža dodeljenih sredstev za razvoj podeželja, ki ga nameravajo porabiti za tehnično pomoč. Opažanja 24 Kar zadeva prvi steber, je financiranje administrativnih stroškov držav članic izključeno iz EKJS.
Administrative costs incurred by beneficiaries of operational funds or programmes are eligible and can be included in the Member States’ declarations on the basis of the delegated acts adopted by the Commission under the new CMO Regulation (EC) No 1308/2013. 
Administrativni stroški upravičencev do operativnih sredstev ali programov so upravičeni in se lahko vključijo v izjave držav članic na podlagi delegiranih aktov, ki jih sprejme Komisija na podlagi nove uredbe o SUT št. 1308/2013.
25 The Commission recognises the importance of justification and transparency of TA‐funded admin‐ istrative costs. 
25 Komisija priznava pomen utemeljenosti in preglednosti administrativnih stroškov, financiranih s tehnično pomočjo.
The sound implementation of the programmes, and ultimately the rural development policy, requires well‐equipped administrations. 
Za učinkovito izvajanje programov in politike razvoja podeželja so potrebne dobro opremljene uprave.
26 The Commission considers that Article 5 of Regula‐ tion (EC) No 1290/2005 provides a single clear legal reference for both the EAGF and EAFRD at Commis‐ sion level and/or on its behalf. 
26 Komisija meni, da člen 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 zagotavlja enotno jasno pravno podlago za EKJS in EKSRP na ravni Komisije in/ali v njenem imenu.
For the new programming period, TA at the level of the Member States is defined under Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 1303/2013. 
Za novo programsko obdobje je tehnična pomoč na ravni držav članic opredeljena v členu 59 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
27 Despite the non‐explicit inclusion of the term ‘capacity‐building’ in Article 5, all the itemised activities lead eventually to capacity‐building of the Commission and Member States’ services for the legal and regular application of CAP rules. 
27 Čeprav izraz „krepitev zmogljivosti“ ni izrecno vključen v člen 5, vse razvrščene dejavnosti sčasoma privedejo do krepitve zmogljivosti storitev Komisije in držav članic za zakonito in pravilno uporabo pravil SKP.
Reply of the Commission 40 28 The legislator, when adopting the regulations, chose a flexible and wide approach for the use of TA by the Member States. 
Odgovori Komisije 40 28 Zakonodajalec se je pri sprejemanju uredb odločil za prožen in širok pristop k uporabi tehnične pomoči s strani držav članic.
The Commission cannot interfere with the application of such provisions, especially when the expenditure is found to be eligible. 
Komisija ne sme posegati v uporabo takšnih določb, zlasti če je ugotovljeno, da so odhodki upravičeni.
Nonetheless, for the current programming period, the Commission has issued specific guidelines for Member States, as well as policy lines and indicative indicators for desk officers. 
Vendar pa je Komisija za sedanje programsko obdobje izdala posebne smernice za države članice ter smernice glede politik in okvirne kazalnike za referente.
Administrative costs supported by TA must be clearly linked to the implementation of the pro‐ gramme. 
Administrativni stroški, plačani s tehnično pomočjo, morajo biti jasno povezani z izvajanjem programa.
The flexibility in the use of funds under TA within the established ceilings does not imply a lack of rigour. 
Prožnost pri uporabi sredstev na podlagi tehnične pomoči v okviru sprejetih zgornjih meja ne pomeni pomanjkanja doslednosti.
Under shared management, Member States should ensure that the EU budget is spent following the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness (Article 30 of the financial regulation (Regulation (EC) No 966/2012). 
Države članice bi morale v okviru deljenega upravljanja zagotoviti, da se proračun EU porabi v skladu z načeli gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti (člen 30 finančne uredbe (Uredba (EU, Euratom) št.
TA expenditure supports activities of the national rural networks (NRNs) of the Member States, which are clearly defined and established in the legal framework (Article 68, Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005) and in the RDPs. 
Odhodki za tehnično pomoč podpirajo dejavnosti nacionalnih mrež za podeželje v državah članicah, ki so jasno opredeljene in vzpostavljene v pravnem okviru (člen 68 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005), in programe razvoja podeželja.
30 In the Commission’s view, the ‘definition’ and the ‘nature’ of TA should be determined by the legislator. 
30 Po mnenju Komisije bi moral „opredelitev“ in „naravo“ tehnične pomoči določiti zakonodajalec.
The aim of the vade mecum for the direct manage‐ ment mode is to provide guidance on the valida‐ tion, financial circuits, processes and procedures applied for the implementation of the budget and not to provide rules on budget allocation between headings. 
Priročnik za neposredno upravljanje je namenjen zagotavljanju smernic o potrjevanju, finančnih tokovih, procesih in postopkih, ki se uporabljajo za izvrševanje proračuna, in ne zagotavljanju pravil o razporejanju proračunskih sredstev med postavkami.
31 According to the Commission’s accounting sys‐ tems, the total value of commitments in 2013 was 21.879.114 euro. 
31 V skladu z računovodskimi sistemi Komisije je skupna vrednost obveznosti leta 2013 znašala 21 879 114 EUR.
The Commission has reinforced networking activities, in particular in relation with the European Innovation Partnership, at the end of the 2007–13 programming period. 
Komisija je ob koncu programskega obdobja 2007–2013 okrepila dejavnosti mreženja, zlasti v zvezi z evropskim partnerstvom za inovacije.
Networking activities were also a key element for the prepa‐ ration of the next programming period. 
Dejavnosti mreženja so bile tudi ključni element za pripravo naslednjega programskega obdobja.
As regards IT systems, the development of new and more sophisticated tools (e.g. RDIS2, SFC) to prepare for the 2014–20 period was implemented mainly as from 2012 and consequently, related expenditure is substantially higher than in 2007. 
Kar zadeva sisteme informacijske tehnologije, je razvoj novih in bolj dovršenih orodij (npr. RDIS2, SFC) za pripravo obdobja 2014– 2020 potekal večinoma od leta 2012, zato so povezani odhodki precej večji kot leta 2007.
See also replies to paragraphs 32–35. 
Glej tudi odgovore na odstavke 32–35.
The development and maintenance of IT admin‐ istrative systems has been progressively taken on board by the horizontal services within the Com‐ mission. 
Razvoj in vzdrževanje upravnih sistemov informacijske tehnologije se postopoma upoštevata pri horizontalnih storitvah v okviru Komisije.
However, the Commission has remained responsible for IT systems serving the CAP. 
Vendar je Komisija še naprej odgovorna za sisteme informacijske tehnologije, ki služijo SKP.
The aforementioned budget articles cover both the initial development costs of the IT systems con‐ cerned and their maintenance costs. 
Zgoraj navedeni proračunski členi vključujejo zadevne začetne stroške razvoja sistemov informacijske tehnologije in stroške njihovega vzdrževanja.
These latter costs involve both the further development of these systems as needs arise (evolutive maintenance) and their needed corrective maintenance and operation. 
Stroški vzdrževanja vključujejo nadaljnji razvoj teh sistemov, če je to potrebno (razvojno vzdrževanje), ter njihovo potrebno korektivno vzdrževanje in delovanje.
Reply of the Commission 41 Guidelines have been issued by the Commission for shared management programmes that provide for the necessary guidance on the type of budget line to use in the case of IT expenditure (and audit) for the purposes of adequate consistency with regards to the budgeting of the IT expenditure. 
Odgovori Komisije 41 Komisija je izdala smernice za programe v okviru deljenega upravljanja, ki zagotavljajo potrebne usmeritve glede vrste proračunske vrstice, ki se uporabi v primeru odhodkov za informacijsko tehnologijo (in revidiranje) za namene ustrezne skladnosti v zvezi z vključitvijo odhodkov za informacijsko tehnologijo v proračun.
All types of IT costs should follow these guidelines, whether IT development or IT maintenance and the mainte‐ nance costs should always be charged in the same budget line as their respective IT development costs. 
Vse vrste stroškov za informacijsko tehnologijo, bodisi za njen razvoj ali vzdrževanje, in stroške vzdrževanja bi bilo treba vedno knjižiti v isto proračunsko vrstico kot ustrezne stroške razvoja informacijske tehnologije.
This approach strengthens the budgetary discipline and consistency in all shared manage‐ ment DGs. 
Ta pristop krepi proračunsko disciplino in skladnost v vseh generalnih direktoratih z deljenim upravljanjem.
36 See Commission reply to paragraph 28. 
36 Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 28.
37 See Commission reply to paragraph 28. 
37 Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 28.