natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In principle, CSPs were to take into account each countryŐs development priorities, so as to ensure country ownership, as well as the CommissionŐs own policies. 
Načeloma naj bi bile v državnih strateških dokumentih upoštevane prednostne razvojne naloge vsake države ter lastne politike Komisije, da se zagotovi občutek lastništva s strani države.
The CommissionŐs strategy concerning the environmental aspects of its development aid, as set out in both its 2000 Development Policy and the Commission Staff Working Paper on the subject, focused on mainstreaming the environment into all areas of development cooperation. 
Strategija Komisije o okoljskih vidikih njene razvojne pomoči, kot je bila določena tako v Razvojni politiki 2000 kot v delovnem dokumentu uslužbencev Komisije o tej temi, je bila osredotočena na integracijo okolja v vsa področja razvojnega sodelovanja.
Therefore it was essential that the environment was mainstreamed into its Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) if the overall strategy was to be effective. 
Za zagotovitev uspešnosti celotne strategije je bilo zato bistveno, da se okolje integrira v vse državne strateške dokumente, ki jih je pripravila.
In fact, reviews of this first generation of CSPs (2001 to 2007) by the Court during the audit and also by the CommissionŐs own services showed that the environment had not been satisfactorily mainstreamed into them. 
Dejansko so pregledi te prve generacije državnih strateških dokumentov (2001–2007), ki jih je med revizijo opravilo Sodišče, pa tudi pregledi Komisijinih služb pokazali, da okolje v te dokumente ni bilo zadovoljivo integrirano.
In a sample of (1) In 2002 the World Bank introduced a new two-dimensional coding system. 
Analiza okoljskih (1) Leta 2002 je Svetovna banka uvedla nov dvodimenzionalni šifrirni sistem.
Each loan is tracked by both theme and sector codes. 
Vsako posojilo je označeno s tematsko in sektorsko šifro.
The 11 theme codes correspond to the goals and objectives of Bank activities and the 12 sector codes indicate the parts of the economy that directly benefit from Bank support. 
11 tematskih šifer ustreza nalogam in ciljem dejavnosti Banke, 12 sektorskih šifer pa označuje dele gospodarstva, ki imajo neposredne koristi od bančne podpore.
60 CSPs, none of them mentioned the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) on environmental sustainability and only approximately a quarter made reference to Multilateral Environment Agreements (MEAs). 
V nobenem od 60 državnih strateških dokumentov iz vzorca niso bili omenjeni razvojni cilji novega tisočletja o okoljski trajnosti in približno samo četrtina se jih je sklicevala na večstranske okoljske sporazume.
To some degree the lack of environmental mainstreaming into CSPs reflected the limited priority attached to this issue by many beneficiary countries. 
Do določene mere je pomanjkanje integracije okolja v državne strateške dokumente odražalo omejeno prednostno obravnavo, ki jo tem vprašanjem dodeljujejo mnoge države upravičenke.
For countries with a Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) (2), it has been the CommissionŐs policy to align its CSP to the PRSP. 
Politika Komisije je, da pri državah s strateškim dokumentom za zmanjševanje revščine (2), svoje državne strateške dokumente uskladi s tem dokumentom.
As a World Bank study has shown (3), the environment has generally not been mainstreamed into PRSPs, partly because of a lack of recognition by many beneficiary countries of the important linkages between poverty and the environment. 
Kot je razvidno iz študije Svetovne banke (3), okolje večinoma ni bilo integrirano v strateške dokumente za zmanjševanje revščine, delno tudi zato, ker številne države upravičenke ne priznavajo pomembnih povezav med revščino in okoljem.
Ministries of Environment should in the first place be the advocate of environmental issues in national policies but in practice these ministries, even in more developed countries with major environmental concerns such as Brazil and China, do not have the resources and influence of other, longer established ministries. 
Ministrstva za okolje bi predvsem morala zagovarjati okoljska vprašanja v nacionalnih politikah, vendar v praksi ta ministrstva, celo v razvitejših državah z velikimi okoljevarstvenimi skrbmi, kot sta na primer Brazilija in Kitajska, nimajo virov in vpliva drugih, dlje časa vzpostavljenih ministrstev.
Nevertheless the lack of environmental mainstreaming into development aid also reflects shortcomings on the Commission side. 
Kljub temu pomanjkanje integracije okolja v razvojno pomoč odraža tudi pomanjkljivosti na strani Komisije.
Although the Commission Staff Working Paper on Mainstreaming the Environment stated that such Country Environment Profiles (CEPs) were an important tool for mainstreaming at the programming stage, a Commission review in 2002 covering a sample of 60 CSPs found that only six such CEPs had been drawn up. 
Čeprav je delovni dokument za uslužbence Komisije o integraciji okolja na-vajal, da so državni okoljski profili pomembno orodje za integracijo na stopnji načrtovanja programov, je Komisija leta 2002 s pregledom, ki je zajel vzorec šestdesetih državnih strateških dokumentov, ugotovila, da je bilo pripravljenih samo šest takih državnih okoljskih profilov.
This is despite the fact that such country environmental analysis has been best practice since 1992 when the OECD Development Assistance Committee issued guidelines on the subject (4). 
Tako je bilo kljub dejstvu, da je bila taka državna okoljska analiza najboljša praksa od leta 1992, ko je Odbor za razvojno pomoč OECD izdal smernice o tem (4).
The Commission took an important step in 2005 to address this issue by establishing CEPs for Asian, Latin American and Mediterranean aid beneficiary countries as part of the process of preparing the next generation of Country Strategy Papers for the period 2007 to 2013. 
Komisija je v okviru procesa priprave naslednje generacije državnih strateških dokumentov za obdobje 2007–2013, leta 2005 storila pomemben korak k rešitvi tega vprašanja z uvedbo državnih okoljskih profilov za azijske, latinskoameriške in sredo-zemske države upravičenke.
A similar approach is being followed for the ACP States. 
Podoben pristop se uporablja tudi za države AKP.
As the CSPs were still under preparation at the time the audit was completed, it was still too early to assess how far the CEPs had improved mainstreaming in the CSPs. 
Ker so bili državni strateški dokumenti v času, ko je bila revizija že zaključena, še v pripravi, je bilo prezgodaj za oceno, v kolikšni meri so državni okoljski profili izboljšali integracijo v državne strateške dokumente.
This ultimately depends on how high a priority both the beneficiary countries and Commission services attach to addressing in the CSP the environmental issues raised by the CEPs. 
To je nazadnje odvisno tudi od tega, kako visoko prednost države upravičenke in Komisija pripisujejo obravnavanju okoljskih vprašanj, ki jih zastavljajo državni okoljski profili, v državnih strateških dokumentih.
(3) Status and evolution of environmental priorities in the poverty reduction strategies: an assessment of fifty poverty reduction papers. 
(3) „Stanje in razvoj okoljskih prednostnih nalog v strategijah za zmanjševanje revščine: ocena petdesetih dokumentov o zmanjševanju revščine“.
Environment department papers, World Bank, November 2003. 
Oddelčni okoljski dokumenti, Svetovna banka, november 2003.
(4) OECD Development Assistance Committee. 
(4) Odbor za razvojno pomoč OECD.
Guidelines on Aid and Environment. 
Smernice o pomoči in okolju.
No. 2: ÔGood Practices for Country Environmental Surveys and StrategiesŐ. 
Št. 2: „Dobre prakse za raziskave okolja in strategije držav“.
The equivalent term used by the Commission is Country Environmental Profile (CEP). 
Enakovreden izraz, ki ga uporablja Komisija, je državni okoljski profil.
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/11 34. 
29.9.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 235/11 34.
In this respect the Commission has made only limited progress in building up environmental awareness and mainstreaming capacity in beneficiary countries since the adoption of its own mainstreaming strategy. 
V tem pogledu je Komisija od sprejetja svoje strategije integracije, pri povečevanju okoljske ozaveščenosti in sposobnosti integracije v državah upravičenkah, dosegla le omejen napredek.
A specific instrument available to the Commission for promoting the integration of the environment into its development cooperation is Regulation (EC) No 2493/2000, which has a budget of 93 million euro over the period 2000 to 2006 (1). 
Poseben instrument, ki je Komisiji na voljo za spodbujanje integracije okolja v njeno razvojno sodelovanje, je Uredba (ES) št. 2493/2000, ki ima za obdobje 2000–2006 proračun v vrednosti 93 milijonov EUR (1).
However, the instrument has had only limited impact. 
Vendar je imel ta instrument le omejen vpliv.
This instrument could significantly help environmental capacity building in developing countries. 
Ta instrument bi lahko precej pripomogel k izgradnji okoljskih zmogljivosti v državah v razvoju.
But the Commission has not established an overall approach to capacity building, and has only developed individual projects on an ad hoc basis. 
Vendar Komisija v zvezi z izgradnjo zmogljivosti ni sprejela celostnega pristopa, ampak je le priložnostno razvijala posamezne projekte.
On the Commission side, it is of concern that only limited use was made in 2005 by officials responsible for CSP preparation of the opportunities for training in environmental mainstreaming (see Box 4). 
Kar zadeva Komisijo, je zaskrbljujoče, da so uradniki, odgovorni za pripravo državnih strateških dokumentov, leta 2005 le v omejeni meri izkoristili priložnosti za usposabljanje v zvezi z integracijo okolja (glej okvir 4).
While DG Development, DG Environment and Europeaid all have specialised units reviewing the environmental aspects of CSPs, these reviews are not generally based on the detailed knowledge of the country concerned, while the spreading of limited staff resources across these three DGs also means that checks are often superficial. 
Čeprav imajo Generalni direktorat za razvoj, Generalni direktorat za okolje in EuropeAid vsi specializirane enote za pregled okoljskih vidikov državnih strateških dokumentov, ti pregledi na splošno ne temeljijo na podrobnem poznavanju zadevne države, porazdelitev omejenih kadrovskih virov med te tri generalne direktorate pa pomeni tudi, da so pregledi pogosto površni.
Little has been done to mainstream the environment into budgetary support programmes 36. 
Za integracijo okolja v programe proračunske podpore je bilo malo storjeno 36.
It is Commission and wider donor policy for budgetary support to make up an increasing percentage of overall aid. 
Politika Komisije in donatorska politika v širšem smislu je, da bi se moral odstotek proračunske podpore glede na skupno pomoč povečevati.
Thus, approximately 25 % of EDF funding allocated to ACP countries under the current CSPs has been allocated to such support. 
Zato je bilo približno 25 % proračunskih sredstev Evropskega razvojnega sklada dodeljenih državam AKP v okviru tekočih državnih strateških dokumentov, dodeljenih tej podpori.
However, the Commission has done little to mainstream the environment into this newer form of aid although the Council stated in its conclusions of 31 May 2001 on the CommissionŐs environmental integration strategy that: Ôenvironmental considerations should be systematically incorporated into the preparation of all ... structural adjustment programmes and sector-wide reform and support programmesŐ (2). 
Vendar je Komisija storila malo, da bi v to novejšo obliko pomoči integrirala okolje, čeprav je Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 31. maja 2001 o Komisijini strategiji za integracijo okolja navedel, da „bi morali biti okoljski pomisleki sistematično vključeni v pripravo vseh ... programov strukturnega prilagajanja ter programov reforme celotnega sektorja in podpornih programov“ (2).
The main environmental appraisal tool to be used in the context of budgetary support programmes is the Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA). 
Glavno okoljsko ocenjevalno orodje za uporabo v okviru programov proračunske podpore je strateška okoljska presoja.
This examines the environmental aspects of the beneficiary countries policies, plans and programmes financed by the budgetary support, notably the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. 
Ta preučuje okoljske vidike politik, načrtov ter programov držav upravičenk, ki so financirani s proračunsko podporo, predvsem strateške dokumente o zmanjševanju revščine.
The Council conclusions noted that Ôto achieve mainstreaming, Strategic Environment Assessement (SEA) should be used systematically particularly during the preparation of structural and sectoral programmes and for new (1) Regulation(EC)No2493/2000oftheEuropeanParliamentandofthe Council of 7 November 2000 on measures to promote the full integration of the environmental dimension in the development process of developing countries (OJ L 288, 15.11.2000, p. 
V sklepih Sveta je navedeno, da „je treba za doseganje integracije sistematično (1) Uredba (ES) št. 2493/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. novembra 2000 o ukrepih za spodbujanje ohranjanja tropskih gozdov in drugih gozdov v državah v razvoju ter trajnostnega gospodarjenja z njimi (UL L 288, 15.11.2000, str.
(2) Council conclusions on a strategy on the integration of environmental concerns into EC economic and development cooperation to promote sustainable development paragraph 3.6 (8971/01). infrastructuresŐ (3). 
(2) Sklepi Sveta o strategiji za integracijo okoljevarstvenih skrbi v gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj ES v okviru spodbujanja trajnostnega razvoja, odstavek 3.6 (8971/01). uporabljati strateško okoljsko presojo, zlasti med pripravo strukturnih in sektorskih programov ter pri novih infrastrukturah“ (3).
The importance of SEA is also recognised in the CommissionŐs mainstreaming strategy. 
Pomembnost strateške okoljske presoje je priznana tudi v strategiji Komisije za integracijo.
The Commission has made very little use of it so far, partly because, in contrast to CEPs and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), it is a relatively new tool which the donor community as a whole is still mastering (4). 
Komisija tega orodja doslej ni veliko uporabljala, delno tudi zato, ker je to v nasprotju z državnimi strateškimi dokumenti in presojami vplivov na okolje, relativno novo orodje, ki se ga donatorska skupnost kot celota šele uči uporabljati (4).
Nevertheless, the Commission could have used its extensive manuals on budgetary and sectoral support to stress the environmental aspects of such aid, but they contain virtually no reference to the environment. 
Kljub temu bi Komisija lahko svoje obsežne priročnike o proračunski in sektorski podpori uporabila za poudarjanje okoljskih vidikov takšne pomoči, vendar se ti na okolje skoraj ne sklicujejo.
Thus, Commission staff has had no guidelines either on when and how to use SEAs and on how to carry out more limited environmental appraisals where SEAs are not considered appropriate. 
Osebje Komisije tako ni imelo smernic o tem kdaj in kako uporabiti strateške okoljske presoje in kako izvesti bolj omejene okoljske ocene, kjer strateške okoljske presoje niso ustrezne.
This lack of environmental appraisal procedures is reflected in the preparation of budgetary support programmes: (a) In no country was an appraisal made by the Commission of the possible environmental impact of the government policies and programmes supported by budgetary aid. (b) Out of 20 ACP countries which had received general budget support under the ninth EDF by 2005) in only one country, Tanzania, were conditions attached designed to support the environment. 
To pomanjkanje postopkov za okoljske ocene se odraža v pripravi programov proračunske podpore: (a) Komisija ni v nobeni državi izvedla ocene možnega vpliva vladnih politik in programov proračunske podpore na okolje. (b) Med 20 državami AKP, ki so prejele splošno proračunsko podporo v okviru devetega ERS do leta 2005, so bili samo v eni državi, Tanzaniji, priloženi pogoji zasnovani za podporo okolju.
Box 5 An example of mainstreaming the environment into budgetary support programmes In Tanzania under the Poverty Reduction Budget Support Programme 2003-2006 (114 million euro), donors and the Government of Tanzania had made the passing of environmental legislation one of the six poverty reduction strategy objectives. 
Okvir 5 Primer integracije okolja v programe proračunske podpore V Tanzaniji so donatorji in tanzanijska vlada v okviru programa Proračunska podpora za zmanjševanje revščine (Poverty Reduc-tion Budget Support) za obdobje 2003–2006 (114 milijonov EUR) postavili sprejetje okoljske zakonodaje za enega od šestih ciljev strategije za zmanjševanje revščine.
This provided considerable support to the passing of the Environment Management Act in 2005. (c) Despite the important links between poverty and environment, poverty reduction indicators did not address environmental issues. (d) In the two priority sectors for the CommissionŐs budgetary aid, education and health, the significant opportunities for mainstreaming environmental issues into these two areas, particularly in relation to preventive health care, were not taken advantage of. (e) Increasingly, the Commission is seeking to provide its support to roads through sectoral policy support programmes, rather than individual projects, which means there is a particular need for SEAs if negative environmental impacts are to be avoided. 
To je zagotovilo precejšnjo podporo sprejetju Zakona o ravnanju z okoljem leta 2005. (c) Kljub pomembnim povezavam med revščino in okoljem, kazalniki zmanjševanja revščine niso obravnavali okoljskih vprašanj. (d) V dveh prednostnih sektorjih Komisijine proračunske pomoči, izobraževanju in zdravstvenem varstvu, niso bile izkoriščene znatne priložnosti za integracijo okoljskih vprašanj v ti dve področji, zlasti v zvezi s preventivnim zdravstvenim varstvom. (e) Komisija skuša svojo pomoč za ceste vse bolj zagotavljati prek podpornih programov sektorskim politikam, manj pa posameznim projektom, kar pomeni, da obstaja posebna potreba po strateških okoljskih presojah, če se želimo izogniti negativnim vplivom na okolje.
(3) Council conclusions on a strategy on the integration of environmental concerns into EC economic and development cooperation to promote sustainable development paragraph 3.14 (8971/01). 
(3) Sklepi Sveta o strategiji za integracijo okoljevarstvenih skrbi v gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj ES v okviru spodbujanja trajnostnega razvoja, odstavek 3.14 (8971/01).
(4) At the time of the audit the OECD DAC had a working party on the use of SEAs in the context of development cooperation. 
(4) V času revizije je v okviru razvojnega sodelovanja imel Odbor za razvojno pomoč OECD delovno skupino o uporabi presoj vplivov na okolje.
C 235/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.9.2006 Procedures for environmental mainstreaming at project level have not been sufficiently systematic 39. 
C 235/12 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 29.9.2006 Postopki za integracijo okolja na ravni projektov niso bili dovolj sistematični 39.
Despite the increasing proportion of aid channelled through budgetary support, the funding of projects is still the main aid delivery mechanism. 
Kljub naraščajočemu deležu pomoči, posredovane prek proračunske podpore, je financiranje projektov še vedno glavni mehanizem dovajanja pomoči.
A first step in the environmental appraisal of projects is to screen them in order to assess potential environmental risks and opportunities. 
Prvi korak pri okoljskem ocenjevanju projektov je njihov pregled, da se ocenijo možna okoljska tveganja in priložnosti.
The 2001 draft Environment Integration Manual established the principle of such screening in the form of an ÔEnvironmental Integration FormŐ to be completed for each project and following guidelines in the manual. 
Osnutek priročnika o integraciji okolja iz leta 2001 je načelo pregleda projektov z okoljskega vidika vzpostavil v obliki „obrazca za integracijo okolja“, ki ga je treba izpolniti za vsak projekt v skladu s smernicami priročnika.
Since the Manual has remained only a draft (see paragraph 21), this procedure has not been systematically introduced. 
Ker je priročnik ostal samo osnutek (glej odstavek 21), ta postopek ni bil sistematično uveden.
As a result many Delegations used other procedures or did not follow any environmental screening procedures at all. 
Zato so številne delegacije uporabljale druge postopke ali pa sploh niso uporabljale nobenih postopkov za pregled projektov.
These deficiencies are partly due to the fact that environmental experts are not involved in screening non-environmental projects. 
Do teh pomanjkljivosti je delno prišlo zaradi dejstva, da okoljski strokovnjaki ne sodelujejo pri pregledih projektov, ki niso povezani z okoljem.
In the Delegations, environmental expertise is largely focused on countries where the environment is a priority field, and in any case such expertise is not used to check the environmental aspects of project identification fiches for non-environmental projects. 
V delegacijah se strokovno znanje o okolju večinoma osredotoča na države, kjer je okolje prednostno področje, v vsakem primeru pa se tako znanje ne uporablja za preverjanje okoljskih vidikov v opredelitvah projektnih predlogov za projekte, ki niso povezani z okoljem.
At Europeaid, the number of environmental experts is similarly only sufficient to assess the quality of environment and natural resource projects but not whether the environment has been mainstreamed into non-environment projects. 
Podobno v Uradu za sodelovanje EuropeAid število okoljskih strokovnjakov zadošča samo za ocenjevanje projektov o okolju in naravnih virih, ne pa tudi za oceno, ali je bilo okolje integrirano v projekte, ki niso bili povezani z okoljem.
Shortcomings in the screening process contributed to problems in identifying when Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) should be carried out. 
Pomanjkljivosti v procesu pregleda so prispevale k težavam pri ugotavljanju, kdaj bi bilo treba izvesti presoje vplivov na okolje.
EIAs are long-established tools for identifying ex-ante the likely impact of a project on the environment and recommending mitigating measures for the design and implementation phase. 
Slednje so že dobro uveljavljena orodja za predhodno ugotavljanje možnega vpliva projekta na okolje in predstavljajo priporočene blažilne ukrepe za fazo načrtovanja in izvajanja.
The European Union has had EIA legislation for internal policies since 1985 (2). 
Evropska unija ima za notranje politike od leta 1985 zakonodajo o presojah vplivov na okolje (2).
The 1990 Lom IV Convention required EIAs to be carried out for large-scale projects and those posing a significant threat to the environment (3). 
Po Konvenciji iz Loméja IV iz leta 1990 morajo biti presoje vplivov na okolje izvedene za obsežne projekte ter projekte, ki pomenijo pomembno grožnjo za okolje (3).
In 1992 the OECD DAC issued best practice guidelines on ElAs for development projects to be followed by all its members (4). 
Leta 1992 je Odbor za razvojno pomoč OECD izdal smernice za najboljšo prakso o presojah vplivov na okolje, ki jih morajo upoštevati vse njene članice (4).
EIAs are particularly relevant for infrastructure and mining projects, since these generally have a high environmental impact. 
Presoje vplivov na okolje so zlasti pomembne pri infrastrukturnih in rudarskih projektih, saj imajo ti na splošno velik vpliv na okolje.
Up to 35 % of ninth EDF financing under the current Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) is allocated for road projects alone. 
V okviru tekočih državnih strateških dokumentov je do 35 % sredstev devetega ERS dodeljenih samo za cestne projekte.
However, the CourtŐs audit identified several such projects where no EIA had been drawn up. 
Vendar je revizija Sodišča odkrila več takih projektov, pri katerih presoja vplivov na okolje ni bila opravljena.