natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recommendation 3 The Commission should put in place a comprehensive monitoring system for the Youth Guarantee Scheme, covering both structural reforms and measures targeting individuals. 
Priporočilo 3 Komisija naj vzpostavi celovit sistem za spremljanje programa jamstva za mlade, ki bi zajel strukturne reforme in ukrepe, usmerjene na posameznike.
The results of this monitoring should be reported to the European Parliament and the Council. 
O rezultatih tega spremljanja naj poro‐ ča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Conclusions and recommendations 36 This report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mr Henri GRETHEN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 25 February 2015. 
Zaključki in priporočila 36 To poročilo je sprejel senat II, ki ga vodi g. Henri GRETHEN, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 25. februarja 2015.
Annexes 37 Youth unemployment rate (June 2014) Percentage of labour force (EU average = 22 %) < 10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 > 50 Annex I 24.1 34.7 53.4 Source: Eurostat. 
Priloge 37 Stopnja brezposelnosti mladih (junij 2014) odstotek delovne sile (povprečje EU = 22 %) <10 10–20 20–30 30–40 40–50 >50 Priloga I 24,1 34,7 53,4 Vir: Eurostat.
Annexes 38 Countries eligible for YEI funding Region(s) eligible for funding under the Youth Employment Initiative Member State Youth Employment Initiative specific allocation (euro) Belgium Yes 42 435 070 Bulgaria Yes 55 188 745 Czech Republic Yes 13 599 984 Denmark No - Germany No - Estonia No - Ireland Yes 68 145 419 Greece Yes 171 517 029 Spain Yes 943 496 315 France Yes 310 161 402 Croatia Yes 66 177 144 Italy Yes 567 511 248 Cyprus Yes 11 572 101 Latvia Yes 29 010 639 Lithuania Yes 31 782 633 Luxembourg No - Hungary Yes 49 765 356 Malta No - Netherlands No - Austria No - Poland Yes 252 437 822 Portugal Yes 160 772 169 Romania Yes 105 994 315 Slovenia Yes 9 211 536 Slovakia Yes 72 175 259 Finland No - Sweden Yes 44 163 096 United Kingdom Yes 206 098 124 TOTAL 3 211 215 406 Annex II 
Priloge 38 Države, ki so upravičene do financiranja PZM Regije, ki so upravičene do financiranja Posebna dodelitev v okviru pobude za Država članica v okviru pobude za zaposlovanje mladih zaposlovanje mladih (v EUR) Belgija da 42 435 070 Bolgarija da 55 188 745 Češka da 13 599 984 Danska ne – Nemčija ne – Estonija ne – Irska da 68 145 419 Grčija da 171 517 029 Španija da 943 496 315 Francija da 310 161 402 Hrvaška da 66 177 144 Italija da 567 511 248 Ciper da 11 572 101 Latvija da 29 010 639 Litva da 31 782 633 Luksemburg ne – Madžarska da 49 765 356 Malta ne – Nizozemska ne – Avstrija ne – Poljska da 252 437 822 Portugalska da 160 772 169 Romunija da 105 994 315 Slovenija da 9 211 536 Slovaška da 72 175 259 Finska ne – Švedska da 44 163 096 Združeno kraljestvo da 206 098 124 SKUPAJ 3 211 215 406 Priloga II
Annexes 39 Commission assessment of YGIP and YEI ex ante conditionalities Member States Bulgaria Czech Republic Greece Italy Lithuania Poland United Kingdom Belgium Ireland Spain France Croatia Cyprus Latvia Hungary Portugal Slovenia Slovakia Sweden Outcome of YGIP assessment Very limited Very limited Very limited Very limited Very limited Very limited Very limited Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Partial Ex ante conditionality Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Not fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Fulfilled Note: The YEI ex ante conditionalities for Romania were not assessed by the Commission at the time of the audit. 
Priloge 39 Ocena INJM in predhodnih pogojenosti v zvezi s PZM, ki jo je pripravila Komisija Država članica Bolgarija Češka Grčija Italija Litva Poljska Združeno kraljestvo Belgija Irska Španija Francija Hrvaška Ciper Latvija Madžarska Portugalska Slovenija Slovaška Švedska Izid ocene INJM zelo omejeno zelo omejeno zelo omejeno zelo omejeno zelo omejeno zelo omejeno zelo omejeno delno delno delno delno delno delno delno delno delno delno delno delno Predhodna pogojenost izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena Ni izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena izpolnjena Opomba: Komisija do časa revizije ni ocenila predhodnih pogojenosti v zvezi s PZM za Romunijo.
Reply of the 40 Commission Executive summary V First bullet The Commission notes the recommendation addressed to Member States and would indeed welcome in some cases a better overview of the estimated cost of all planned measures to combat youth unemployment. 
Odgovori 40 Komisije Povzetek V Prva alinea Komisija sprejema v vednost priporočilo, naslov‐ ljeno na države članice, in bi v nekaterih primerih resnično pozdravila boljši pregled nad ocenjenimi stroški vseh načrtovanih ukrepov za boj proti brez‐ poselnosti mladih.
The template produced by the Commission requested Member States to provide information on EU, national, regional/local, employer and other funding sources thus encouraging the Member States to give the complete information on the overall costs and funding of a YG (including funding gaps). 
V predlogi, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, se od držav članic zahteva, naj predložijo informacije o virih financiranja na ravni EU, nacionalni, regionalni/ lokalni ravni, pri delodajalcih in o drugih virih finan‐ ciranja, s čimer se jih spodbuja k navedbi popol‐ nih informacij o celotnih stroških in financiranju jamstva za mlade (vključno z vrzelmi v financiranju).
19 out of 28 Member States have provided this information (with different degrees of detail). 
Navedene informacije je zagotovilo 19 od 28 držav članic (pri čemer niso vse informacije enako podrobne).
V Second bullet The Commission accepts the recommendation and considers it as partially implemented, in particular through the Council recommendation on a quality framework for traineeships, the European Alliance for Apprenticeships and the related Council declara‐ tion and the monitoring of the quality of employ‐ ment in the European Semester. 
V Druga alinea Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in meni, da je delno že izvedeno, zlasti prek Priporočila Sveta o okviru za kakovost pripravništev, Evropske koali‐ cije za vajeništva in povezane izjave Sveta ter spre‐ mljanja kakovosti zaposlitev v okviru evropskega semestra.
Regarding the promotion of qualitative attributes, the Commission will further stimulate the reflection around ‘good quality’ offers, taking into account the qualitative attributes mentioned in the Guid‐ ance for evaluation of the YEI. 
V zvezi s spodbujanjem kvalitativnih značilnosti bo Komisija še naprej spodbujala razmislek o kako‐ vostnih ponudbah, pri čemer se bodo upoštevale kvalitativne značilnosti, omenjene v smernicah za vrednotenje PZM.
The Commission will in particular: animate a debate on the concept of ‘good quality’ offers in the next meeting of national YG coordinators, invite Member States to discuss the concept of ‘good quality’ offers in the context of the EMCO work, explore the possibility of address‐ ing ‘good quality’ YG offers under the Mutual Learn‐ ing Programme (MLP), and provide further guidance on ‘good quality’ in the YG FAQ document. 
Komisija bo zlasti: obudila raz‐ pravo o pojmu kakovostne ponudbe na naslednjem sestanku nacionalnih koordinatorjev jamstev za mlade, povabila države članice k razpravi o pojmu kakovostna ponudba v okviru dela Odbora za zapo‐ slovanje, proučila možnost obravnave kakovostnih ponudb v okviru jamstva za mlade na podlagi pro‐ grama vzajemnega učenja ter zagotovila dodatne smernice o kakovosti v dokumentu z odgovori na pogosto zastavljena vprašanja v zvezi z jamstvom za mlade.
The Commission notes that ex post evaluations will provide evidence on the quality of job offers, as recommended in the guidance for the evaluation of YEI. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da bodo naknadna vrednotenja zagotovila dokaze o kakovosti ponudb za zaposli‐ tev, kot je priporočeno v smernicah za ocenjevanje PZM.
V Third bullet The Commission accepts the recommendation and considers it as partially implemented through the indicators framework as endorsed by the EPSCO Council, through the relevant arrangements that are set out in Article 19 and Annex I and II of the ESF regulation and relevant CPR provisions related to monitoring and evaluation in the case of measures financed from the YEI and through its commitment to report on the implementation of the Youth Guar‐ antee to the European Parliament and the Council in 2016. 
V Tretja alinea Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in meni, da je delno že izvedeno prek okvira kazalnikov, kot ga je potrdil Svet EU za zaposlovanje, socialno politiko, zdravje ter potrošnike (EPSCO), ustreznih ureditev, določenih v členu 19 ter prilogah I in II k uredbi o ESS in ustreznih določbah uredbe o skupnih določbah (CPR) v zvezi s spremljanjem in vredno‐ tenjem v primeru ukrepov, financiranih iz PZM, ter z njeno zavezo, da bo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu leta 2016 poročala o izvajanju jamstva za mlade.
Monitoring activities will feed into the Commis‐ sion’s assessment of the Youth Guarantee imple‐ mentation under future European Semesters. 
Dejavnosti spremljanja bodo prispevale k oceni Komisije o izvajanju jamstva za mlade v okviru prihodnjih evropskih semestrov.
They will also inform the Commission’s 2016 report on the implementation of the Youth Guarantee, which will be formally submitted to the European Parlia‐ ment and the Council through the appropriate channels. 
Prav tako bodo zagotovile informacije za poročilo Komisije o izvaja‐ nju jamstva za mlade leta 2016, ki ga bo po ustrezni poti uradno predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Introduction 15 The Commission notes that a further 11 billion aim at measures such as modernisation of employment services and self‐employment measures which will also indirectly support youth employment. 
Uvod 15 Komisija ugotavlja, da je dodatnih 11 milijard EUR namenjenih za ukrepe, kot je posodobitev zavodov za zaposlovanje, in ukrepe za samozaposlovanje, ki bodo tudi posredno podpirali zaposlovanje mladih.
Over 26 billion euros will be spent on educa‐ tion measures including life‐long learning where young people are likely to be among the main beneficiaries. 
Več kot 26 milijard EUR bo porabljenih za ukrepe izobraževanja, vključno z vseživljenjskim učenjem, pri katerih naj bi bili mladi med glavnimi upravičenci.
Observations 37 The Commission would like to remind that it oper‐ ates in a soft law environment, based on a Council recommendation and that while many sub‐ele‐ ments of a Youth Guarantee are desirable where appropriate, not all of them need to be part of a particular national scheme. 
Opažanja 37 Komisija želi spomniti, da deluje v nezavezujočem pravnem okolju na podlagi priporočila Sveta in da so številni podelementi jamstva za mlade sicer zaže‐ leni, kjer je to mogoče, vendar ni nujno, da so vsi del nekega nacionalnega programa.
Reply of the Commission 41 Moreover, the evaluation of the submitted YGIP was just a first step in a process of continued monitor‐ ing of the implementation of the Youth Guarantee in Member States. 
Odgovori Komisije 41 Poleg tega je bila ocena predloženega INJM šele prvi korak v procesu stalnega spremljanja izvaja‐ nja jamstva za mlade v državah članicah.
The Commission monitors the implementation of Youth Guarantee schemes within the European Semester. 
Komisija spremlja izvajanje programov jamstva za mlade v okviru evropskega semestra.
The European Semester process covers a broad spectrum of national poli‐ cies which are linked to the delivery of a Youth Guarantee. 
Proces evropskega semestra zajema vrsto nacionalnih politik, poveza‐ nih z izvajanjem jamstva za mlade.
37 First indent In the context of the European Semester, the need for enhancing ICT/digital skills is highlighted where appropriate. 
37 Prva alinea V okviru evropskega semestra se poudarja potreba po krepitvi znanja in spretnosti s področja IKT in digitalnega področja, kadar je to primerno.
37 Second indent The Commission is of the opinion that failure to consider a link between the non‐acceptance of a reasonable offer and unemployment or social assistance benefits does not necessarily limit the effectiveness of a Youth Guarantee scheme. 
37 Druga alinea Komisija meni, da neupoštevanje povezave med nesprejetjem razumne ponudbe in nadomestili za brezposelnost ali socialno varstvo ne omejuje nujno uspešnosti programa jamstva za mlade.
The Commission’s staff working document sets out that principles of mutual obligation such as participation in active labour market policies could be considered when designing a Youth Guarantee scheme1. 
Delovni dokument služb Komisije določa, da bi se lahko pri oblikovanju programov jamstva za mlade upoštevala načela vzajemne obveznosti, kot je ude‐ ležba v aktivnih politikah trga dela1.
In the Council recommendation the princi‐ ple of mutual obligation is called upon in the context of early intervention and activation (recommendation 10). 
Priporočilo Sveta se sklicuje na načelo vzajemne obveznosti v okviru zgodnjega posredovanja in aktiviranja (priporočilo 10).
While ‘mutual obligation’ may carry important benefits, it does not figure in the assessment grid, as it would be too prescriptive to judge a scheme against its inclusion in case a Member State chooses to not base their scheme on it or in case their national provisions and practices do not allow it. 
Čeprav ima lahko „vzajemna obveznost“ pomembne koristi, ni vključena v ocenjevalni okvir, saj bi bilo preveč predpisovalno, da bi program oce‐ njevali glede na njeno vključenost, če bi se država članica odločila, da njen program ne bo temeljil na vzajemni obveznosti, ali če njeni nacionalni predpisi in prakse tega ne bi dopuščali.
Priority was therefore given to assess the main building blocks of the Youth Guarantee and the intended existence and coverage of offers. 
Zato je dobila prednost ocena glavnih gradnikov jamstva za mlade ter načrtovanega obstoja in vklju‐ čitve ponudb.
1 European Commission Staff Working Document, SWD(2012) 409 final, p. 
1 Delovni dokument služb Komisije, SWD(2012) 409 final, str.
41 In the context of an adoption of an operational pro‐ gramme containing YEI‐related measures, ‘a strate‐ gic policy framework for promoting youth employ‐ ment’ must be in place before any disbursement of funds from the Commission. 
41 V okviru sprejetja operativnega programa, ki vsebuje ukrepe, povezane s PZM, mora biti pred kakršnim koli črpanjem sredstev Komisije vzpostav‐ ljen „strateški okvir politike za spodbujanje zapo‐ slovanja mladih“.
The Commission’s assessment of this pre‐condition (so called YEI ex ante conditionality) is based on the Member State’s self‐assessment and the information provided therein. 
Ocena tega predhodnega pogoja (tako imenovana predhodna pogojenost za PZM), ki jo opravi Komisija, temelji na samooceni države članice in informacijah, predloženih v njej.
Whenever the Member State has referred to additional national strategies on youth employment other than the YGIP, the Commission had to base its assessment regarding the YEI ex ante conditionality fulfilment on all the strategic documents for youth employment referred to by the Member States. 
Če se je država članica sklicevala na dodatne nacionalne strategije za zaposlovanje mladih, ki niso INJM, je morala Komisija oceniti izpolnjevanje predhodne pogojenosti za PZM na podlagi vseh strateških dokumentov za zaposlovanje mladih, na katere so se sklicevale države članice.
Nev‐ ertheless, when assessing the YEI ex ante condition‐ ality, the Commission looks at the consistency with the YGIP so that the ESF investments will match the policy objectives of the Member State concerned. 
Vendar Komisija pri ocenjevanju predhodne pogojenosti za PZM preveri skladnost z INJM, da bodo naložbe ESS skladne s cilji politike zadevne države članice.
42 The Commission notes that the assessment frame‐ work for YGIP is not the same as for the YEI ex ante conditionality, as the two processes are driven by different objectives — respectively policy objective (YG) and legal compliance (YEI). 
42 Komisija ugotavlja, da ocenjevalni okvir za INJM ni enak kot za predhodno pogojenost za PZM, saj imata ta postopka različne cilje, in sicer cilj politike (pri jamstvu za mlade) in skladnost z zakonodajo (pri PZM).
The criteria for fulfilment of the ex ante conditional‐ ity do require ‘the existence of a strategic policy framework for promoting youth employment including through the implementation of the Youth Guarantee’. 
Pri merilih za izpolnjevanje predhodne pogojenosti se zahteva „obstoj strateškega okvira politike za spodbujanje zaposlovanja mladih, tudi z izvajanjem jamstva za mlade“.
The sub‐criteria against which this ‘strategic policy framework’ should be assessed by the Commission services were also laid down in the regulation. 
V uredbi so bila določena tudi podrejena merila, na podlagi katerih bi morale službe Komisije oceniti ta „strateški okvir politike“.
The latter do not make any reference to the existence of a YGIP and a fortiori to its positive assessment by the Commission. 
Ta se ne sklicujejo na obstoj INJM in zlasti ne na njegovo pozitivno oceno s strani Komisije.
Therefore, there is no automatic link between the assessment of the YGIP which is done from a policy perspective and against the Youth Guarantee recommendation and the assessment of the YEI‐ related EAC which is done through a fixed set of criteria detailed in the CPR. 
Zato ni samodejne povezave med oceno INJM, ki se izvede s političnega vidika in glede na priporočilo o jamstvu za mlade, ter oceno GD za izobraževa‐ nje in kulturo v zvezi z PZM, ki se izvede na pod‐ lagi točno določenega sklopa meril, opredeljenih v uredbi CPR.
Reply of the Commission 42 The Commission notes that such a link which would have made the existence of a YGIP a legal require‐ ment for fulfilling the YEI ex ante conditionality was proposed by the Commission but rejected by the Council during the legislative process. 
Odgovori Komisije 42 Komisija poudarja, da je predlagala tako povezavo, na podlagi katere bi bil obstoj INJM zakonska zah‐ teva za izpolnitev predhodne pogojenosti za PZM, vendar jo je Svet med zakonodajnim postopkom zavrnil.
43 The Commission refers to its reply to paragraph 42. 
43 Komisija se sklicuje na odgovor na odstavek 42.
The sub‐criteria against which the ‘strategy policy framework for promoting youth employment’ should be assessed contain also qualitative ele‐ ments such as the identification of key stakehold‐ ers, including the public authorities involved and the coordinating arrangements with the partners, the set‐up of early intervention and activation sys‐ tems as well as the monitoring arrangements. 
Podrejena merila, na podlagi katerih je treba ocenjevati „strateški okvir politike za spodbujanje zaposlovanja mladih“, vsebujejo tudi kvalitativne elemente, kot so opredelitev ključnih deležnikov, vključno z vpletenimi javnimi organi in usklajeval‐ nimi ureditvami s partnerji, vzpostavitev sistemov za zgodnje posredovanje in aktiviranje ter ureditve glede spremljanja.
The assessment of these qualitative elements is going beyond a pure formality check. 
Ocenjevanje teh kvalitativnih elementov presega zgolj formalni pregled.
Moreover, to the extent feasible, the context of the Commission’s assessment of the YEI ex ante conditionality fulfilment did serve as a channel for requesting certain modifications to the YGIP (for example in the case of France). 
Poleg tega so se, kolikor je bilo to izvedljivo, v okviru ocenjevanja predhodne pogojenosti za PZM, ki ga je izvedla Komisija, zahtevale nekatere spremembe INJM (kot v primeru Francije).
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 55 and 56 The Commission agrees and would like to point out that investing in a Youth Guarantee is crucial for the EU to preserve its future growth potential. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 45 in 46 Komisija se strinja in želi poudariti, da je vlaganje v jamstvo za mlade ključno za ohranitev prihod‐ njega potenciala rasti EU.
Signifi‐ cant EU financial support can help — most notably from the European Social Fund and in the context of the Youth Employment Initiative. 
K temu lahko prispeva znatna finančna podpora EU, predvsem iz Evrop‐ skega socialnega sklada in v okviru pobude za zaposlovanje mladih.
But to make the Youth Guarantee a reality, Member States also need to prioritise youth employment measures in their national budgets. 
Da bi države članice jamstvo za mlade uresničile, morajo dati prednost ukrepom za zaposlovanje mladih tudi v svojih nacionalnih proračunih.
47 19 out of 28 Member States have provided informa‐ tion on the envisaged sources of funding of their Youth Guarantee scheme (with different degrees of detail). 
47 19 od 28 držav članic je predložilo informacije o predvidenih virih financiranja svojih programov jamstva za mlade (pri čemer te informacije niso bile enako podrobne).
In some cases, the Commission would how‐ ever welcome a better overview of the estimated cost of all planned measures even if it is aware that any estimates of the costs of a Youth Guarantee are subject to caveats. 
Vendar bi v nekaterih primerih Komisija pozdravila boljši pregled nad ocenjenimi stroški vseh načrtovanih ukrepov, četudi se zaveda, da za kakršno koli oceno stroškov jamstva za mlade veljajo pridržki.
49 The Youth Guarantee recommendation does not prescribe any precise way in which the Member States will implement the Youth Guarantee since it will very much depend on the national situation (i.e. number of the NEETs they have and their specific characteristics). 
49 Priporočilo o jamstvu za mlade ne določa natančno, kako bodo države članice izvajale jamstvo za mlade, saj bo to zelo odvisno od nacionalnih razmer (tj. števila mladih, ki niso zaposleni, se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo, in njihovih posebnih značilnosti).
The impacts will therefore depend on the choice of Member States as regards the targeting and the design of the support. 
Učinki bodo zato odvisni od odločitev držav članic glede ciljne usmerjenosti in oblike podpore.
As explained in the Explanatory Memorandum of the Commission’s proposal, it is accompanied by a staff working document (SWD), which goes into more details about what constitutes a Youth Guarantee, addresses questions about costs and benefits of such schemes, and describes one by one the ingredients necessary to make the Youth Guarantee a success. 
Kot je pojasnjeno v obrazložitvenem memoran‐ dumu predloga Komisije, je temu priložen delovni dokument služb Komisije (SWD), ki vsebuje podrob‐ nejšo razlago o tem, kaj sestavlja jamstvo za mlade, obravnava vprašanja o stroških in koristih takih pro‐ gramov in opisuje posamezne elemente, potrebne za uspeh jamstva za mlade.
Furthermore, in an annex, the SWD presents policies supporting youth employ‐ ment already in place in the 27 Member States and Croatia, reflecting the various starting points of these countries towards setting up fully‐fledged Youth Guarantee schemes. 
Poleg tega so v prilogi k delovnemu dokumentu služb Komisije predsta‐ vljene politike za podporo zaposlovanju mladih, ki so že vzpostavljene v 27 državah članicah in na Hrvaškem in v katerih se kažejo različna izhodišča teh držav pri uvajanju popolnoma razvitih progra‐ mov jamstva za mlade.
The real cost of a Youth Guarantee will also depend on the national circumstances and the way in which it is set up and implemented in each Member State. 
Dejanski stroški jamstva za mlade bodo odvisni tudi od nacionalnih razmer in tega, kako bo program vzpostavljen in izvajan v vsaki državi članici.
As such, any estimates of the costs of a Youth Guar‐ antee are subject to a number of caveats. 
Zato za kakršno koli oceno stroškov jamstva za mlade velja več pridržkov.
In that respect, country examples of Austria, Finland, Sweden and the UK could be considered as an indication of potential costs for the Member States intentions about implementing the Youth Guarantee. 
V zvezi s tem bi lahko pri načrtovanju izvajanja jamstva za mlade v državah članicah kot prikaz potencialnih stroškov proučili primere Avstrije, Finske, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva.
50 The Commission refers to its reply to paragraph 15. 
Odgovori Komisije 43 50 Komisija se sklicuje na odgovor na odstavek 15.