natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
59 Concerning the delay in delivering TA projects under shared management, the Commission wishes to highlight that in line with the conditionality set out in the macroeconomic adjustment programme, the contract with the OECD was signed by the Greek authorities; thus the implementation and the monitoring of the contracts remained under full the responsibility of the Greek authorities. 
59 Glede zamude pri izvajanju projektov tehnične pomoči v okviru deljenega upravljanja Komisija izpostavlja, da so grški organi v skladu s pogojem iz programa za makroekonomsko prilagoditev podpisali pogodbo z OECD, zato so za izvajanje in spremljanje pogodb v celoti odgovorni grški organi.
See also the Commission replies to paragraphs 32 and 47. 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavka 32 in 47.
60 The division of competences between Member States and the European Union entail that the responsibility for the implementation of structural reforms lie with the Member State. 
60 Razdelitev pristojnosti med državami članicami in Evropsko unijo pomeni, da je za izvajanje strukturnih reform odgovorna država članica.
Common reply to paragraphs 61 to 65 See the Commission reply to paragraph 60. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke od 61 do 65 Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 60.
66 Greece achieved a high rate of absorption with respect to the 2007-2013 programming period, arriving in a good position at the EU level. 
66 Grčija je v zvezi s programskim obdobjem 2007– 2013 dosegla visoko stopnjo črpanja in se povzpela na dober položaj na ravni EU.
This was achieved through close cooperation between officials from the Commission and Greek ministries and managing authorities in order to support them in administrative terms, setting deadlines, providing technical support where necessary. 
To se je doseglo s tesnim sodelovanjem uradnikov Komisije ter grških ministrstev in organov upravljanja, da se jim zagotovi podpora v upravnem smislu, pri določanju rokov in po potrebi pri zagotavljanju tehnične podpore.
Common reply to paragraphs 67 to 70 See the Commission reply to paragraph 60. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke od 67 do 70 Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 60.
71 The Commission shares the analysis of the Court concerning the reasons for the slow progress made and the difficulties experienced in providing TA through taxation projects. 
71 Komisija se strinja z analizo Računskega sodišča glede vzrokov za počasen napredek in težav pri zagotavljanju tehnične pomoči z davčnimi projekti.
See also the Commission reply to paragraph 60. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 60.
72 See the Commission reply to paragraph 60. 
72 Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 60.
Reply of the Commission 58 Conclusions and recommendations 74 For the Commission interpretation of ‘a broadly-based programme of technical assistance’, see the Commission reply to paragraph I. Recommendation 1 The Commission accepts recommendation 1. 
Odgovori Komisije 58 Zaključki in priporočila 74 Za razlago pojma „širok program tehnične pomoči“ Komisije glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek I. Priporočilo 1 Komisija sprejema priporočilo 1.
The new SRSS service will take this recommendation into account for new TA assignments. 
Nova podporna služba za strukturne reforme bo to priporočilo upoštevala pri novih nalogah na področju tehnične pomoči.
The Commission intends to incorporate the recommendation of the Court in the definition of the framework for the SRSS activities. 
Komisija namerava vključiti priporočilo Računskega sodišča v opredelitev okvira za dejavnosti podporne službe za strukturne reforme.
76 The Commission considers that the TFGR has fulfilled its mandate. 
76 Komisija meni, da je delovna skupina za Grčijo izpolnila svoj mandat.
See the Commission reply to part II of this report. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na del II tega poročila.
76 First alinea The Commission considers that the TA was shown to be optimal through a combination of embedded experts and short-term experts, local and international, in order to fully embrace complex areas of reform, while always taking into account the highly specific nature of the tasks and technical skills required. 
76, prva alinea Komisija meni, da se je tehnična pomoč izkazala za optimalno zaradi kombinacije lokalnih in mednarodnih vključenih strokovnjakov in strokovnjakov za kratkoročno pomoč, da se v celoti zajamejo zapletena področja reforme, pri čemer se vedno upošteva zelo specifična narava nalog in zahtevanih tehničnih spretnosti.
Among the different mechanisms for TA provision, the use of external contractors is of the utmost importance for the delivery of technical assistance in cases where the expertise was not available within the Commission. 
Med številnimi različnimi mehanizmi za zagotavljanje tehnične pomoči je bila uporaba zunanjih pogodbenikov izredno pomembna za zagotavljanje tehnične pomoči v primerih, ko strokovno znanje ni bilo na voljo znotraj Komisije.
The Commission therefore used the existing instruments to contract experts who fulfilled the necessary requirements. 
Komisija je zato uporabila obstoječe instrumente za najem strokovnjakov, ki so izpolnjevali potrebne zahteve.
Based on the provisions in the staff regulations, the Commission employed experts directly also on a non-permanent basis; the use of external expertise was based on a needs assessment. 
Komisija je na podlagi določb kadrovskih predpisov neposredno zaposlila strokovnjake tudi za določen čas, uporaba zunanjega strokovnega znanja pa je temeljila na oceni potreb.
Therefore, the Commission employed only the resources needed in the framework of the urgent solutions to be provided in the Greek context, including the number of service providers and external expertise. 
Zato je Komisija zaposlila le vire, ki jih je potrebovala za zagotovitev nujnih rešitev v zvezi z Grčijo, vključno z več izvajalci storitev in zunanjim strokovnim znanjem.
76 Second alinea The Commission selected the service providers in full respect of the legal framework and the existing Commission rules. 
76, druga alinea Komisija je pri izbiri izvajalcev storitev v celoti upoštevala pravni okvir in obstoječa pravila Komisije.
76 Fourth alinea The Commission considers the design of the terms of reference adequate. 
76, četrta alinea Komisija meni, da je bila zasnova opisa nalog ustrezno pripravljena.
The Commission adopted different and specific approaches when designing terms of reference and action plans depending on the type of project, the conditionality of the macroeconomic adjustment programme, the type of intervention to be carried out, the circumstances under which the contractor had to contribute to the action and the state of advancement of the project. 
Komisija je sprejemala različne in posebne pristope pri pripravi opisa nalog in akcijskih načrtov glede na vrsto projekta, pogoje iz programa za makroekonomsko prilagoditev, vrsto posredovanja, ki se izvede, okoliščine, pod katerimi je moral pogodbenik prispevati k ukrepu, in stanje v zvezi z napredkom projekta.
See also the Commission replies to paragraphs 49 and 50. 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavka 49 in 50.
Recommendation 2 The Commission accepts recommendation 2. 
Priporočilo 2 Komisija sprejema priporočilo 2.
Reply of the Commission 59 Recommendation 3 The Commission accepts recommendation 3. 
Odgovori Komisije 59 Priporočilo 3 Komisija sprejema priporočilo 3.
Taking into account the important number of efforts deployed by Member States (euro area or non-euro area), the Commission, international and national organisations in order to support Greece in facing the crisis and undertaking the necessary reform planning and implementation, the Commission considers that the number of stakeholders involved was appropriate. 
Komisija meni, da je bilo število vključenih deležnikov glede na številna pomembna prizadevanja držav članic (držav članic v euroobmočju in držav članic, ki niso v euroobmočju), Komisije ter mednarodnih in nacionalnih organizacij pri zagotavljanju podpore Grčiji pri soočanju s krizo ter sprejemanju in izvajanju potrebnega načrtovanja reforme ustrezno.
Therefore, the number of partners reflected the actions that were necessary in order to fully address the purpose of the assistance. 
Zato je število partnerjev odražalo ukrepe, ki so bili potrebni, da se je v celoti obravnaval namen pomoči.
The TFGR’s strategy characterised by a high degree of flexibility to allow for a quick and efficient response to the changing needs in an environment of profound crisis and urgency to act proved to be well adapted to the circumstances. 
Značilnost strategije delovne skupine za Grčijo je bila visoka stopnja fleksibilnosti, da se omogoči hiter in učinkovit odziv na spreminjajoče se potrebe v razmerah, ki so posledica velike krize, in ob upoštevanju nujnosti ukrepanja, ki se je izkazala za dobro prilagojeno okoliščinam.
The Commission would like to point out that, depending on the needs and circumstances, the TFGR chose the most appropriate approach and use of resources, including, among other things, by embedding in Greek ministries and administrations experts from the Commission, international organisations, national agencies and/or high-level civil servants from other Member States, by organising workshops and by providing short-term experts. 
Komisija izpostavlja, da je delovna skupina za Grčijo glede na potrebe in okoliščine izbrala najustreznejši pristop in uporabo virov, med drugim tudi z vključevanjem strokovnjakov Komisije, mednarodnih organizacij in nacionalnih agencij in/ali javnih uslužbencev na visoki ravni iz drugih držav članic v grška ministrstva in uprave, organizacijo delavnic in zagotavljanjem strokovnjakov za kratkoročno pomoč.
Therefore, the setting-up of the planning cycle inside the TFGR responded to this general context ensuring the flexibility needed in the decision process on different options for delivery of TA. 
Zato je bila vzpostavitev cikla načrtovanja v okviru delovne skupine za Grčijo odgovor na ta splošni kontekst, s katerim se je zagotovila potrebna fleksibilnost pri postopku odločanja o različnih možnostih zagotavljanja tehnične pomoči.
The prioritisation of actions was dependent on the requests of the Greek authorities and on the economic adjustment programme’s conditions and had to be adjusted according to the outcomes of negotiations. 
Prednostna razvrstitev ukrepov je bila odvisna od zahtevkov grških organom in od pogojev iz programa za makroekonomsko prilagoditev, prilagoditi pa jo je bilo treba glede na rezultate pogajanj.
The procedures followed by the TFGR for the assignment of long-term contracts to international organisations or national agencies were compliant with the procedures foreseen in the financial regulation, its rules of application and the decision-making process. 
Postopki delovne skupine za Grčijo za dodelitev dolgoročnih pogodb mednarodnim organizacijam ali nacionalnim agencijam so bili skladni s postopki iz finančne uredbe, pravili uporabe in postopkom odločanja.
All national agencies and international organisations selected had been audited at Commission level (4-and 6-pillar assessments) confirming their satisfactory experience in the management of contracts funded by the EU budget. 
Vse izbrane nacionalne agencije in mednarodne organizacije so bile revidirane na ravni Komisije (ocena stebrov 4 in 6), s čimer se je potrdilo, da imajo zadostno strokovno znanje na področju upravljanju pogodb, ki se financirajo iz proračuna EU.
The Commission would like to stress that an additional effort has been made in the results-based approach after the entry into force of the new financial regulation in 2013: new Framework Agreements were signed with 6-pillar organisations insisting on results-based projects, following the logical framework description and for which value for money is to be established at the beginning of the contracting process. 
Komisija izpostavlja dodatna prizadevanja pri pristopu na podlagi rezultatov po začetku veljavnosti nove finančne uredbe leta 2013. Z organizacijami s šestimi stebri so bili podpisani novi okvirni sporazumi, ki so določali, da morajo projekti temeljiti na rezultatih in logičnem opisu okvira, zanje pa je treba na začetku postopka sklepanja pogodb določiti najugodnejšo ponudbo.
77 The Commission monitored the overall implementation of the technical assistance. 
77 Komisija je spremljala splošno izvajanje tehnične pomoči.
The specific projects to implement the reforms were conducted under the responsibility of the Greek authorities and were therefore not subject to monitoring by the Commission. 
Posebni projekti za izvajanje reform so se izvedli v okviru odgovornosti grških organov, zato jih Komisija ni spremljala.
79 See the Commission reply to part III of this report and to paragraph 55. 
79 Glej odgovor Komisije na del III tega poročila in odstavek 55.
Reply of the Commission 60 Recommendation 6 The Commission accepts recommendation 6 and will systematically monitor the TA that is conducted under its direct responsibility as contracting authority. 
Odgovori Komisije 60 Priporočilo 6 Komisija sprejema priporočilo 6 in bo sistematično spremljala tehnično pomoč, ki jo izvaja v okviru neposredne odgovornosti, ki jo ima kot javni naročnik.
In setting up the new framework that will be the basis for the SRSS actions, the Commission will consider, in its ex-ante analysis, the lessons learned and the experience gained during the implementation of the TA actions by the TFGR. 
Pri vzpostavitvi novega okvira, ki bo osnova za ukrepe podporne službe za strukturne ukrepe, bo Komisija pri svoji predhodni analizi proučila spoznanja in izkušnje, pridobljene med izvajanjem ukrepov tehnične pomoči s strani delovne skupine za Grčijo.
Moreover, the Commission considers launching a call for tender for an ex-post evaluation of the activities implemented in Greece, once all TA activities are completed. 
Poleg tega bo Komisija proučila možnost objave povabila k oddaji ponudb za naknadno vrednotenje dejavnosti, ki se izvajajo v Grčiji, po zaključku vseh dejavnosti tehnične pomoči.
Recommendation 7 The Commission accepts recommendation 7. 
Priporočilo 7 Komisija sprejema priporočilo 7.
The Task Force for Greece was established in 2011 by the European Commission to support implementation of the Economic adjustment programme with a broad range of technical assistance. 
Delovno skupino za Grčijo je poleti 2011 ustanovila Evropska komisija, da bi izvajanje programa za makroekonomsko prilagoditev podprla s širokim razponom tehnične pomoči.
This report examines whether the task force fulfilled its mandate and whether the assistance provided for Greece made an effective contribution to the reform process. 
V tem poročilu je bilo preučeno, ali je delovna skupina za Grčijo izpolnila svoj mandat in ali je pomoč, zagotovljena Grčiji, uspešno prispevala k reformnemu procesu.
EN 2015 Special Report NO 20 The cost-effectiveness of EU Rural Development support for non-productive investments in agriculture EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
št. 20 Posebno poročilo SL 2015 Stroškovna učinkovitost podpore EU za razvoj podeželja za neproduktivne naložbe v kmetijstvu EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 Print ISBN 978-92-872-3289-2 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-3285-4 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-3246-5 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/401675 doi:10.2865/432137 doi:10.2865/92054 QJ-AB-15-017-EN-C QJ-AB-15-017-EN-N QJ-AB-15-017-EN-E © European Union, 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2015 Print ISBN 978-92-872-3290-8 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-3255-7 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-3234-2 ISSN 1831-094X ISSN 1977-5784 ISSN 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/364447 doi:10.2865/722236 doi:10.2865/79030 QJ-AB-15-017-SL-C QJ-AB-15-017-SL-N QJ-AB-15-017-SL-E © Evropska unija, 2015 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
EN 2015 Special Report NO 20 The cost-effectiveness of EU Rural Development support for non-productive investments in agriculture (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
20 Posebno poročilo SL 2015 Stroškovna učinkovitost podpore EU za razvoj podeželja za neproduktivne naložbe v kmetijstvu (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
This performance audit was produced by Audit Chamber I — headed by ECA Member Augustyn Kubik — which specialises in preservation and management of natural resources spending areas. 
To revizijo smotrnosti poslovanja je opravil senat I, ki ga vodi član Evropskega računskega sodišča Augustyn Kubik in ki je specializiran za porabo na področju ohranjanja in upravljanja naravnih virov.
The audit was led by ECA Member Jan Kinšt, supported by Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, head of private office; Bernard Moya, private office attaché; Davide Lingua, head of unit; Paulo Oliveira, team leader. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Jan Kinšt, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njegovega kabineta Alejandro Ballester Gallardo in ataše Bernard Moya, vodja enote Davide Lingua in vodja ekipe Paulo Oliveira.
The audit team consisted of Franco Radicati; Anne Poulsen; Paul Toulet-Morlane and Zoltan Papp. 
Revizijsko ekipo so sestavljali Franco Radicati, Anne Poulsen, Paul Toulet-Morlane in Zoltan Papp.
Secretarial assistance was provided by Murielle Siffert. 
Tajniško pomoč je zagotovila Murielle Siffert.
Contents 03 Paragraph Glossary I-IX Executive summary 1-9 Introduction 1-9 EU support for non-productive investments in agriculture 10-14 Audit scope and approach 15-71 Observations 15-34 The Court found indications of effective NPI support, despite weaknesses in the selection procedures and the monitoring tools 17-18 Despite the broad definition of agri-environment needs, Member States targeted the aid by restricting the types of NPI eligible for funding 19-23 All four audited Member States referred to the complementarity of NPI support, but only two applied it at operational level to foster synergies with other support schemes 24 Weaknesses in the audited Member States’ selection procedures led to NPIs being supported that were ineligible, or whose selection was insufficiently justified 25-31 There was a lack of relevant information to show what has been achieved by EU support to NPIs at EU and Member State levels ... 
Kazalo 03 Odstavek Glosar Povzetek Uvod Podpora EU za neproduktivne naložbe v kmetijstvu Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Opažanja Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je bila podpora za neproduktivne naložbe kljub slabostim v izbirnih postopkih in orodjih za spremljanje uspešna Države članice so kljub široki opredelitvi kmetijsko-okoljskih potreb usmerile pomoč tako, da so omejile vrste neproduktivnih naložb, upravičenih do financiranja Vse štiri revidirane države članice so omenile dopolnjevanje podpore za neproduktivne naložbe, vendar sta ga le dve izvajali na operativni ravni, da bi spodbudili sinergije z drugimi shemami podpore Zaradi slabosti v izbirnih postopkih revidiranih držav članic so podporo prejele neproduktivne naložbe, ki do nje niso bile upravičene ali katerih izbira ni bila dovolj utemeljena Ustreznih informacij o tem, kaj je bilo s podporo EU za neproduktivne naložbe doseženo na ravni EU in na ravni držav članic, ni bilo dovolj ... ...
32-34 ... nevertheless, the Court found indications that 71 % of the audited NPIs contributed to objectives linked to the sustainable use of agricultural land 35-50 In the audited Member States, the costs of supported NPIs were often unreasonably high or insufficiently justified 39-41 NPIs receive high rates of public funding even though sometimes they include remunerative components 42-48 Audited Member States funded investments with excessively high costs or with costs which were insufficiently justified 49-50 There were problems with the reasonableness of the costs in most of the NPIs audited by the Court 
Sodišče pa je kljub temu ugotovilo, da je 71 % revidiranih neproduktivnih naložb prispevalo k doseganju ciljev, povezanih s trajnostno rabo kmetijskih zemljišč V revidiranih državah članicah so bili stroški neproduktivnih naložb, ki so prejele podporo, pogosto nerazumno visoki ali nezadostno utemeljeni Neproduktivne naložbe prejemajo visoke stopnje javnega financiranja, čeprav včasih vključujejo profitne elemente Revidirane države članice so financirale naložbe s previsokimi stroški ali stroški, ki niso bili dovolj utemeljeni Pri večini neproduktivnih naložb, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, so bile ugotovljene težave v zvezi z razumnostjo stroškov I-IX 1–9 1–9 10–14 15–71 15–34 17–18 19–23 24 25–31 32–34 35–50 39–41 42–48 49–50
Contents 04 51-71 Weaknesses affecting the cost-effectiveness of NPI support in the 2007-2013 period had not yet been corrected by the start of the 2014-2020 period 60-61 Complementarity not always achieved at operational level to foster synergies 62-64 Lack of appropriate indicators and performance data beyond inputs and output 65-66 Weaknesses in the selection procedures 67-68 Aid rates not adjusted on the basis of the remunerative features of the investments 69-70 Unreasonable or insufficiently justified costs 71 Other eligibility issues 72-81 Conclusions and recommendations Annex I — Annex II — Annex III — Main characteristics of the EAFRD measure support for non-productive investments in agriculture Summary of NPI visited on the spot Summary of needs, objectives and types of NPI per Member State Reply of the Commission 
Kazalo 04 51-71 Slabosti, ki so vplivale na stroškovno učinkovitost pomoči za neproduktivne naložbe v obdobju 2007–2013, na začetku obdobja 2014–2020 še niso bile odpravljene 60-61 Dopolnjevanje za spodbujanje sinergij na operativni ravni ni bilo vedno doseženo 62-64 Pomanjkanje ustreznih kazalnikov in podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja, ki bi zagotavljali več kot le podatke o vložkih in izložkih 65-66 Slabosti izbirnih postopkov 67-68 Stopnje pomoči niso prilagojene na podlagi profitnih značilnosti naložb 69-70 Nerazumski ali nezadostno utemeljeni stroški 71 Druga težava v zvezi z upravičenostjo 72-81 Sklepi in priporočila Priloga I — Priloga II — Priloga III — Glavne značilnosti podpore za neproduktivne naložbe v kmetijstvu v okviru ukrepov EKSRP Povzetek neproduktivnih naložb, obiskanih na kraju samem Povzetek potreb, ciljev in vrst neproduktivnih naložb po državah članicah Odgovori Komisije
Cost-effectiveness analysis: Compares the costs and effects of an intervention to assess the extent to which it can be regarded as providing value for money. 
Glosar 05 Analiza stroškovne učinkovitosti: primerja stroške in učinke intervencije, da se oceni, v kolikšnem obsegu je mogoče šteti, da je stroškovno učinkovita.
For the purpose of this audit, non-productive investments are considered to be cost-effective when: (i) they are effective (see definition of effectiveness below) and; (ii) there is no evidence that the same investments could have been implemented at lower costs. 
V tej reviziji se neproduktivne naložbe štejejo kot stroškovno učinkovite, če: (i) so uspešne (glej opredelitev uspešnosti v nadaljevanju) in (ii) ni dokazov, da bi se te naložbe lahko izvedle tudi z nižjimi stroški.
When the same investments could have been implemented at lower costs, the value for money of such investments is undermined, since the same objectives and/or results would have been achieved at lower costs. 
Če bi se te naložbe lahko izvedle z nižjimi stroški, je njihova stroškovna učinkovitost zmanjšana, ker to pomeni, da bi bili isti cilji in/ali rezultati lahko doseženi z nižjimi stroški.
EAFRD: European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. 
EKSRP: Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja.
Efficiency: Achieving the best relationship between effectiveness and costs. 
Učinkovitost: doseganje najboljšega razmerja med uspešnostjo in stroški.
Measure: An aid scheme for implementing a policy. 
Ukrep: shema pomoči za izvajanje politike.
Each measure sets out specific rules to be complied with by the projects or actions that can be financed. 
V vsakem ukrepu so določena posebna pravila, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati projekti ali dejavnosti, ki se lahko financirajo.
There are two main types of measures: investment measures and area-related aid. 
Obstajata dve glavni vrsti ukrepov: naložbeni ukrepi in pomoč na površino.