natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Box 4 Exhaustive statistics for specific environmental features such as stone walls are rarely available and it would be costly to constitute them. 
Okvir 4 Izčrpni statistični podatki za posamezne okoljske značilnosti, kot so kamniti zidovi, so redko na voljo, njihovo pridobivanje pa bi bilo drago.
28 CMEF is one of the tools through which the impact of investments can be assessed. 
28 Skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja je eno izmed orodij, s katerim se lahko oceni vpliv naložb.
The result indicators such as the number of hectares under successful land management are relevant since they are used as input for the evaluations which aim at assessing the contributions of the relevant group of measures. 
Kazalniki rezultatov, kot je število hektarjev uspešno upravljanih zemljišč, so relevantni, saj se uporabljajo kot vhodni podatki pri vrednotenju, s katerim se ocenjuje prispevek zadevne skupine ukrepov.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 27. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 27.
30 The mid-term evaluation for the 2007-2013 programming period came too early for results to be measurable. 
30 Vmesno vrednotenje za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 je bilo opravljeno prezgodaj, da bi bili rezultati lahko merljivi.
As regards the 2014-2020 programming period enhanced implementation reports in 2017 and 2019 will replace the mid-term evaluation. 
Kar zadeva programsko obdobje 2014–2020, bodo leta 2017 in 2019 vmesno vrednotenje nadomestila poglobljena poročila o izvajanju.
31 Collecting specific result indicators for NPIs can be burdensome. 
31 Zbiranje posebnih kazalnikov rezultatov za neproduktivne naložbe je lahko obremenjujoče.
A more thorough assessment of the effectiveness of all measures against programmes’ objectives will be performed at the time of the ex post evaluation. 
Temeljitejša ocena uspešnosti vseh ukrepov glede na cilje programov bo opravljena pri naknadnem vrednotenju.
34 See Commission reply to paragraph 33. 
34 Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 33.
36 By their very nature NPIs are not expected to provide significant economic returns, although some limited economic benefits cannot be excluded. 
36 Glede na svoj značaj neproduktivne naložbe ne zagotavljajo bistvenega gospodarskega donosa, čeprav določenih gospodarskih koristi ni mogoče izključiti.
Where economic benefits prevail over environmental ones, the respective investment should be funded under measure 121. 
Če gospodarske koristi prevladajo nad okoljskimi, je treba zadevno naložbo financirati v okviru ukrepa 121.
Demarcation between the two measures is assessed at the time of programmes’ approval. 
Razmejitev med obema ukrepoma se oceni v fazi odobritve programov.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 37 and 38 Although the NPIs should be free of productive elements, any kind of investment has at least a small element of ‘productivity’ in it. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 37 in 38 Čeprav neproduktivne naložbe ne bi smele vsebovati elementov produktivnosti, ima vsaka vrsta naložbe vsaj majhen element „produktivnosti“.
Nevertheless, such investments should remain mostly non-productive and their ‘productive’ or remunerative features should be limited. 
Kljub temu bi morale takšne naložbe ostati večinoma neproduktivne, njihove „produktivne“ ali profitne značilnosti pa bi morale biti omejene.
The difference in the maximum support rate between productive and non-productive investments is due to the fact that the latter by definition are not supposed to bring significant economic benefits. 
Razlika v najvišji stopnji podpore med produktivnimi in neproduktivnimi naložbami je posledica dejstva, da slednje že po definiciji ne bi smele zagotavljati bistvene gospodarske koristi.
39 See common Commission reply to paragraphs 37 and 38. 
39 Glej skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 37 in 38.
Reply of the Commission 50 — The result-oriented approach has been reinforced with the setting of precise targets for the programmes and the reporting throughout the programming period, based on a rationalised common monitoring and evaluation system; — The SWOT analysis of the RDP aims at establishing the baseline for monitoring and evaluation of the programme. 
Odgovori Komisije 50 – v rezultate usmerjen pristop je bil okrepljen z določitvijo natančnih ciljev programov in s poročanjem, ki temelji na racionaliziranem sistemu skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja, v celotnem programskem obdobju; – namen analize prednosti, pomanjkljivosti, priložnosti in nevarnosti v okviru programa razvoja podeželja je vzpostaviti temelje za spremljanje in vrednotenje programa.
52 Corrective actions to address potential weaknesses can also be implemented after the adoption of the programmes through their amendments. 
52 Popravne ukrepe za odpravo morebitnih slabosti je mogoče izvesti tudi po sprejetju programov, in sicer s spremembo teh programov.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 51. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 51.
55 In some Member States the controllability and verifiability of the NPI and related maintenance contracts have been debated in connection with the 2014-2020 programme negotiation. 
55 V nekaterih državah članicah se je o možnostih nadziranja in preverjanja neproduktivnih naložb ter povezanih pogodb o vzdrževanju razpravljalo v okviru pogajanj za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.
56 The Commission carries out the conformity audits in the Member States to verify that the expenditure is in compliance with the rules. 
56 Komisija v državah članicah izvaja revizije skladnosti, s katerimi preverja, ali so odhodki skladni s pravili.
If during these audits weaknesses are found, financial corrections are applied. 
Če se med revizijami ugotovijo slabosti, se opravijo finančni popravki.
The risk factors such as the importance in financial terms, the quality of the control systems, the characteristics of the paying agency, the nature of the measures (its complexity) and any other information and findings from other bodies are taken into account. 
Upoštevajo se dejavniki tveganja, kot je pomembnost v finančnem smislu, kakovost kontrolnih sistemov, značilnosti plačilne agencije, narava ukrepov (njihova zaple-tenost) ter vse informacije in ugotovitve drugih organov.
The financial importance plays a major role in the quantification of the exposure to risk. 
Pomembnost v finančnem smislu ima najpomembnejšo vlogo pri ugotavljanju stopnje izpostavljenosti tveganju.
That means that high expenditure is more likely to be highly ranked and audited. 
To pomeni, da bodo visoki odhodki najverjetneje visoko uvrščeni na seznamu in temeljito revidirani.
Measure 216 was not targeted by the conformity audits during the first years of auditing the 2007-2013 period when the focus was on the agri-environmental measures which represent more than 50 % of the expenditure declared under Axis 2. 
Ukrep 216 ni bil predmet revizij skladnosti v prvih letih izvajanja revizij za programsko obdobje 2007–2013, ko je bil poudarek na kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepih, ki predstavljajo več kot 50 % odhodkov, prijavljenih v okviru osi 2.
Measure 216 was audited in 2014-2015. 
Ukrep 216 je bil revidiran v obdobju 2014–2015.
57 The fact that the audit is still ongoing does not mean that the Member State is not aware of the preliminary results. 
57 Čeprav revizija še poteka, to ne pomeni, da država članica ne pozna predhodnih rezultatov.
In the case of Portugal, the Letter of Findings was sent in April 2014 and the bilateral meeting between the Member State and the Commission took place in September 2014. 
Portugalski je bil dopis z ugotovitvami poslan aprila 2014, dvostransko srečanje med državo članico in Komisijo pa je bilo organizirano septembra 2014.
In the case of England, the Letter of Findings was sent to the Member State in July 2014 and the bilateral meeting took place in December 2014. 
Angliji je bil dopis z ugotovitvami poslan julija 2014, dvostransko srečanje pa je bilo organizirano decembra 2014.
58 Monitoring committees which involve RD managers, broader RD stakeholders and the Commission services in their advisory capacity are better designed to deal with problems and lessons learnt. 
58 Nadzorni odbori, ki vključujejo upravljavce na področju razvoja podeželja, širše deležnike na področju razvoja podeželja in službe Komisije v svetovalni vlogi, so bolje zasnovani za obravnavanje težav in pridobljenega znanja.
The key reason for not having sufficient information on performance in the mid-term evaluation is the timing. 
Glavni razlog, da v času vmesnega vrednotenja ni dovolj informacij o uspešnosti, je časovni okvir.
Firstly, there is a minimum time necessary to launch and initiate the implementation and secondly, all operations, but in particular those in the environmental field, will take time before result of that operation could become measurable. 
Prvič, za uvedbo in začetek izvajanja operacij je namreč potreben določen minimalen čas, drugič pa postanejo pri vseh operacijah, zlasti pri tistih na okoljskem področju, rezultati merljivi šele po določenem obdobju.
60 See reply to paragraph 19. 
60 Glej odgovor na odstavek 19.
61 See reply to paragraph 22. 
61 Glej odgovor na odstavek 22.
62 See common reply to paragraphs 27 and 28. 
62 Glej skupni odgovor na odstavka 27 in 28.
Reply of the Commission 51 63 The assessment of the effects of measures or sub-measures will be carried out against the programmes’ objectives to which they contribute. 
Odgovori Komisije 51 63 Učinki ukrepov ali podukrepov bodo ocenjeni glede na cilje programov, h katerim prispevajo.
The objectives are defined at the level of focus areas for which targets are established ex ante. 
Cilji so opredeljeni na ravni prednostnih območij, za katere so predhodno določeni podrobni cilji.
This approach reflects a result-orientation of the policy and allows to better address the combined effects of measures against relevant objectives. 
Ta pristop izraža usmerjenost politike v rezultate in omogoča boljše reševanje skupnih učinkov ukrepov glede na ustrezne cilje.
Member States can define additional programme-specific indicators in relation to a set of key measures. 
Države članice lahko določijo dodatne kazalnike za posamezne programe glede na nabor ključnih ukrepov.
However, this should not be requested systematically for all measures and sub-measures for reasons of keeping the costs of monitoring/evaluation reasonable and avoiding excessive administrative burden. 
Vendar se tega ne bi smelo sistematično zahtevati za vse ukrepe in podukrepe, da ostanejo stroški spremljanja/vrednotenja razumni in da se prepreči čezmerna upravna obremenitev.
In case of underperformance of the programmes against their targets the Managing Authorities can look further at the level of individual measures/ sub-measures to identify the causes of problems and to effectively target corrective actions. 
V primeru nezadostne uspešnosti programov glede na njihove podrobne cilje lahko organi upravljanja nadalje obravnavajo posamezne ukrepe/podukre-pe, da ugotovijo vzroke težav in učinkovito usmerijo popravne ukrepe.
Moreover, the indicators as defined in the legislation or by the Member States are only the starting point for an evaluation. 
Poleg tega so kazalniki, opredeljeni v zakonodaji ali s strani držav članic, samo izhodiščna točka za vrednotenje.
The evaluators can collect additional information, e.g. through case studies. 
Izvajalci vrednotenja lahko zberejo dodatne informacije, npr. prek študij primerov.
Box 10 The 2014-2020 monitoring will also contain total expenditure by sub-measures including non-productive investments (4.4). 
Okvir 10 Spremljanje v obdobju 2014–2020 bo zajemalo tudi skupne odhodke za podukrepe, vključno z neproduktivnimi naložbami (4.4).
Indicators are one component of the monitoring and evaluation system. 
Kazalniki so en element sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 63. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 63.
65 During the 2007-2013 programming period, the Commission reminded on several occasions the Member States of the obligation to set up genuine selections criteria, ensuring a ranking of projects when the budget allocation did not allow financing all eligible project applications. 
65 Komisija je v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 večkrat opozorila države članice na obvezo, da vzpostavijo pristna merila za izbor, ki zagotavljajo razvrščanje projektov, kadar iz proračunskih sredstev ni mogoče financirati vseh upravičenih projektnih vlog.
In order to help MS to avoid weaknesses in the application of selection criteria and taking into account previous ECA recommendations, the Commission produced guidance on eligibility and selection as regards the 2014-2020 programming period. 
Da bi pomagala državam članicam preprečevati slabosti pri uporabi izbirnih meril in ob upoštevanju prejšnjih priporočil Evropskega računskega sodišča, je Komisija za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 izdala smernice za upravičenost in izbiro.
The Commission can through it audits verify the use of selection criteria. 
Komisija lahko z revizijami preveri uporabo izbirnih meril.
When audits are performed on investment measures, the implementation of selection criteria is indeed systematically verified. 
Pri revizijah naložbenih ukrepov se izvajanje izbirnih meril preverja sistematično.
The Commission has imposed financial corrections for a number of Member States for deficiencies found in the use of selection criteria. 
Komisija je za številne države članice uvedla finančne popravke zaradi ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti pri uporabi izbirnih meril.
66 As regards Denmark, the projects will be selected on the basis of their cost-efficiency in relation to the objectives of the measure (e.g. area of biotope created/cost of the project, etc.). 
66 Kar zadeva Dansko, bodo projekti izbrani na podlagi njihove stroškovne učinkovitosti glede na cilje ukrepa (npr. območje vzpostavljenih biotopov/stro-ški projekta itd.).
67 See common Commission reply to paragraphs 37 and 38. 
67 Glej skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 37 in 38.
68 Denmark has simplified the RDP by reducing the number of possible NPIs to be supported. 
68 Danska je poenostavila program razvoja podeželja z zmanjšanjem števila morebitnih neproduktivnih naložb za podporo.
This could partly explain decreasing variability of the aid rates from the previous RDP. 
To lahko deloma pojasni zmanjševanje razlik med stopnjami pomoči v primerjavi s prejšnjim programom razvoja podeželja.
71 Given the expected contribution of this sub-measure to environmental objectives, excluding feasibility studies from eligible costs might severely undermine its uptake. 
71 Glede na pričakovani prispevek tega podukrepa k okoljskim ciljem bi izključitev študije izvedljivosti iz upravičenih stroškov lahko resno ogrozila njegovo uresničitev.
Reply of the Commission 52 The Commission considers that Denmark’s intention to support feasibility studies under non-productive investments is in line with the legislation: feasibility studies receiving support should be capable of reaching negative investment conclusions. 
Odgovori Komisije 52 Komisija meni, da je namera Danske, da podpre študije izvedljivosti v okviru neproduktivnih naložb, v skladu z zakonodajo: tudi pri študijah izvedljivosti, ki prejmejo podporo, bi moralo biti mogoče, da privedejo do negativnega zaključka glede naložb.
Conclusions and recommendations 72 The NPIs should not generate a significant economic return to those who undertake them. 
Zaključki in priporočila 72 Neproduktivne naložbe ne bi smele ustvarjati bistvenega gospodarskega donosa za tiste, ki jih izvajajo.
In the majority of investments there is always an element of return even though the investment is of a purely non-productive nature, for instance in the case of installing hedges made of trees or bushes which, when pruned or cut, can provide biomass serving as a source of electricity. 
Pri večini naložb vedno obstaja element donosnosti, tudi če je naložba povsem neproduktivne narave, tako se lahko na primer pri ogradah iz dreves ali grmovja ostanki od obrezovanja ali sečnje uporabijo za biomaso, ki služi kot vir električne energije.
Therefore, it is difficult to create an entirely non-productive investment. 
Povsem neproduktivne naložbe je torej težko ustvarjati.
74 The agri-environmental objectives targeted by the NPIs do not always require the complementarity with other RD measures. 
74 Kmetijsko-okoljski cilji, v katere so usmerjene neproduktivne naložbe, ne zahtevajo vedno dopolnjevanja z drugimi ukrepi za razvoj podeželja.
In most cases, NPI support was linked to agri-environmental–climate commitments. 
V večini primerov je bila podpora za neproduktivne naložbe povezana s kmetijsko-okoljsko-podnebnimi zavezami.
However, it is possible to meet the NPIs objectives without a link to any other RD measure. 
Vendar je cilje neproduktivnih naložb mogoče doseči tudi, če niso povezani z nobenim drugim ukrepom za razvoj podeželja.
For instance, supporting the purchase of fences to avoid large carnivores causing damage to livestock achieves the agri-environmental objective per se even without a link to other RD measures. 
S podporo za nakup ograj, ki velikim mesojedim živalim preprečujejo, da bi poškodovale živino, se kmetijsko-okoljski cilj že sam po sebi doseže, tudi če ni povezan z drugimi ukrepi za razvoj podeželja.
Support for NPIs can also exist as a stand-alone sub-measure which contributes to agri-environmental–climate objectives. 
Podpora za neproduktivne naložbe lahko obstaja tudi kot samostojen podukrep, ki prispeva h kmetijsko-okoljsko-pod-nebnim ciljem.
Recommendation 1(a) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 1(a) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
Recommendation 1(b) This part of the recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 1(b) Ta del priporočila velja za države članice.
75 The Commission is of the opinion that only the projects respecting the selection criteria should receive support and that the selection procedures should be clear and transparent. 
75 Komisija meni, da bi morali prejeti podporo samo projekti, ki upoštevajo izbirna merila, ter da bi morali biti izbirni postopki jasni in pregledni.
The selection of operations is better underlined in the legal framework for the 2014-2020 programming period and extensive guidance has been provided to Member States/regions with the aim of ensuring that only the best operations and investments contributing to the programmes’ objectives and priorities are selected. 
V pravnem okviru za programsko obdobje 2014– 2020 je izbor operacij bolje opredeljen in državam članicam/regijam so bile zagotovljene obsežne smernice, ki bodo omogočile, da se izberejo samo najboljše operacije in naložbe, ki bodo prispevale k doseganju ciljev in prednostnih nalog programov.
Recommendation 2(a) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 2(a) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
Reply of the Commission 53 Recommendation 2(b) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Odgovori Komisije 53 Priporočilo 2(b) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission will continue to carry out conformity audits in the Member States in accordance with its audit planning to verify that the expenditure paid is in compliance with the rules including appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects. 
Komisija bo v državah članicah še naprej izvajala revizije skladnosti v skladu s svojim revizijskim načrtom, s čimer bo preverjala, ali so plačani odhodki skladni s pravili, vključno z ustreznimi postopki za izbor in ocenjevanje projektov.
76 The CMES provides monitoring information on what is supported. 
76 Skupni sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja zagotavlja spremljanje informacij o tem, kaj je podprto.
However, a balance needs to be found between what can be done through monitoring and evaluation taking into account the risk of excessive administrative burden and the financial constraints. 
Vendar je treba vzpostaviti ravnotežje med tem, kar je mogoče storiti s spremljanjem in vrednotenjem, pri čemer je treba upoštevati nevarnost čezmerne upravne obremenitve in finančne omejitve.
77 A more thorough assessment of the effectiveness of all measures against programmes’ objectives will be performed at the time of the ex post evaluation. 
77 Temeljitejša ocena uspešnosti vseh ukrepov glede na cilje programov bo opravljena pri naknadnem vrednotenju.
Recommendation 3(a) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 3(a) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The 2014-2020 CMES will monitor the implementation of the measure whereas the evaluation will consider its performance in the context of the relevant RD objectives. 
Skupni sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja 2014– 2020 bo namenjen spremljanju izvajanja ukrepa, z vrednotenjem pa bo ugotovljena njegova uspešnost glede na ustrezne cilje razvoja podeželja.
Recommendation 3(b) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 3(b) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
78 The Commission carries out conformity audits in the Member States to verify that the expenditure is in compliance with the rules. 
78 Komisija v državah članicah izvaja revizije skladnosti, s katerimi preverja, ali so odhodki skladni s pravili.
Since these audits also revealed weaknesses regarding the reasonableness of costs, substantial financial corrections have already been made and a number of conformity clearance procedures are currently ongoing which should lead to further financial corrections. 
Ker so te revizije pokazale tudi slabosti glede razumnosti stroškov, so že bili opravljeni znatni finančni popravki, trenutno pa je v teku več postopkov za potrditev skladnosti, ki naj bi privedli do dodatnih finančnih popravkov.
79 Compliance with one of the methods of selecting an offer (i.e. comparison of different offers, assessment by the evaluation committee or comparison of reference costs with the costs of other similar projects) is sufficient to ensure that the justified and reasonable offers in terms of the costs are selected. 
79 Za zagotovitev, da se izberejo upravičene in stroškovno razumne ponudbe, zadostuje upoštevanje ene od metod za izbiro ponudbe (tj. primerjava različnih ponudb, ocena, ki jo opravi ocenjevalni odbor, ali primerjava referenčnih stroškov s stroški drugih podobnih projektov).
Multiplying obligations can lead to an unnecessary administrative burden. 
Pomnoževanje obveznosti lahko povzroči nepotrebno upravno obremenitev.
80 Although the NPIs should be free of productive elements, it is difficult to have an investment without an element of ‘productivity’ in it. 
80 Čeprav neproduktivne naložbe ne bi smele vsebovati elementa produktivnosti, je težko imeti naložbo, ki ne vsebuje takega elementa.
In other words, it is difficult to imagine a purely NPI. 
Povedano drugače, težko si je predstavljati izključno neproduktivne naložbe.
Nevertheless, such investments should remain mostly non-productive and therefore their ‘productive’ or remunerative features should be sufficiently limited. 
Kljub temu morajo takšne naložbe ostati večinoma neproduktivne in njihove „produktivne“ ali profitne značilnosti bi morale biti zato ustrezno omejene.
The administrative burden and complexity linked to extracting the economic benefits from the eligible expenditure should also not be underestimated. 
Prav tako ne bi smeli podcenjevati upravne obremenitve in zapletenosti, povezanih z ugotavljanjem gospodarskih koristi iz upravičenih odhodkov.
Reply of the Commission 54 Furthermore, Member States can make use of the simplified cost options for the calculations and payments of the grants. 
Odgovori Komisije 54 Poleg tega lahko države članice za izračune in izplačila nepovratnih sredstev uporabijo poenostavljene možnosti obračunavanja stroškov.
In this case a fair, equitable and verifiable calculation must be carried out in advance. 
V tem primeru je treba vnaprej opraviti pošten, pravičen in preverljiv izračun.
Recommendation 4(a) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 4(a) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
Recommendation 4(b) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 4(b) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
Recommendation 4(c) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Priporočilo 4(c) To priporočilo velja za države članice.