natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some target the aid very strongly on specific needs and have established selection procedures to choose the best-suited projects from those eligible applicants (paragraphs 25 to 28). 
Nekatere močno usmerjajo pomoč v posebne potrebe in so vzpostavile izbirne postopke za izbiro najprimernejših projektov upravičenih vlagateljev (odstavki od 25 do 28).
Other Member States have awarded grants to all the project proposals received that meet basic eligibility conditions, regardless of the projects’ contribution to achieving the objectives set for the measure. 
Druge države članice so donacijo dodelile vsem prejetim predlogom projektov, ki so izpolnili osnovne pogoje za upravičenost, ne glede na njihov prispevek k doseganju ciljev, določenih za ukrep.
Such practices lead to a less effective and efficient use of the public funds, both EU and national. 
Takšne prakse so povzročile manj uspešno in manj učinkovito porabo javnih sredstev, tako sredstev EU kot tudi nacionalnih.
The 11,1 billion euro allocated to this measure by the EAFRD has the potential to provide greater value for money if it were better targeted to EU priorities and identified national and regional needs (paragraphs 29 to 32). 
Znesek 11,1 milijarde EUR, ki ga je temu ukrepu dodelil EKSRP, bi lahko zagotovil boljše razmerje med ceno in koristmi, če bi bil bolje usmerjen v prednostne naloge EU in ugotovljene nacionalne in regionalne potrebe (odstavki od 29 do 32).
The Commission approved rural development programmes (RDP) that did not adequately target the aid and, in particular, that did not specify the process or criteria to be applied for selecting projects (paragraphs 33 to 38). 
Komisija je odobrila programe razvoja podeželja (PRP), ki niso dovolj usmerjali pomoči in zlasti niso opredelili procesa ali meril za izbiro projektov (odstavki od 33 do 38).
RECOMMENDATION 1 (a) The Commission should propose legislation with clear requirements for Member States to give details in their RDPs of how the measure will be targeted to the identified needs, and overall priorities, including details of the project selection process and criteria to be implemented, and should ensure that these requirements are met when approving the RDPs. (b) When implementing their RDPs for the forthcoming programming period, Member States should target the aid through clear and relevant selection criteria, addressing the EU priorities and national or regional needs. Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
PRIPOROČILO 1 (a) Komisija naj predlaga zakonodajo z jasnimi zahtevami, da morajo države članice v svojih PRP podrobno navesti, kako bodo ukrep usmerjale v ugotovljene potrebe in splošne prednostne naloge, vključno s podrobnostmi o procesu izbire in merilih za projekte, ki jih bodo uporabljale, ter zagotoviti, da bodo te zahteve izpolnjene, ko se odobrijo PRP. (b) Države članice naj pri izvajanju svojih PRP v prihodnjem programskem obdobju pomoč usmerjajo z jasnimi in ustreznimi izbirnimi merili, ki obravnavajo prednostne naloge EU in nacionalne ali regionalne potrebe. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev
The CMEF has been set up as a tool for the Member States and the Commission. 
Okvir skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja je bil vzpostavljen kot orodje za države članice in Komisijo.
The Court found that it does not generate relevant data which can be used for monitoring the results obtained with the funds spent on measure 121. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da ne daje ustreznih podatkov, ki bi jih bilo mogoče uporabiti za spremljanje rezultatov, doseženih s sredstvi, porabljenimi v okviru ukrepa 121.
The indicators defined do not allow progress in the achievement of the EU’s priorities to be monitored, and the data were found to be of low reliability and do not allow comparisons between Member States (and/or regions) to be drawn (paragraphs 39 to 43). 
Opredeljeni kazalniki ne omogočajo spremljanja napredka pri izpolnjevanju prednostnih nalog EU, podatki niso zanesljivi in ne omogočajo primerjave med državami članicami (in/ali regijami) (odstavki od 39 do 43).
30 RECOMMENDATION 2 The Commission should ensure that for the forthcoming programming period, relevant and reliable information is obtained to facilitate management and monitoring of the measure and to demonstrate the extent to which the aid given is contributing to the achievement of EU priorities. 
30 PRIPOROČILO 2 Komisija naj zagotovi, da se bodo za prihodnje programsko obdobje pridobili ustrezni in zanesljivi podatki, da se omogoči upravljanje in spremljanje ukrepa ter da se pokaže, koliko odobrena pomoč prispeva k izpolnjevanju prednostnih nalog EU.
The 2009 ‘Health Check’ provided some 5 billion euro of extra funding to further strengthen specific EU priorities that were defined as being the EU’s new challenges including climate change and biodiversity. 
S sistematskim pregledom leta 2009 se je zagotovilo približno 5 milijard EUR dodatnih sredstev za okrepitev posebnih prednostnih nalog EU, ki so bile opredeljene kot novi izzivi EU, vključno s podnebnimi spremembami in biotsko raznovrstnostjo.
The absence of effective targeting mechanisms weakens the potential effectiveness of the additional funds in meeting these challenges. 
Zaradi pomanjkanja uspešnega mehanizma za usmerjanje je potencialna uspešnost dodatnih sredstev pri izpolnjevanju teh izzivov oslabljena.
Moreover, the Court’s audit revealed instances where a ‘further strengthening’ will not be achieved due to the substitution of the extra ‘Health Check’/EERP funding with funds already programmed for the measures concerned prior to the ‘Health Check’ (paragraphs 44 to 55). 
Poleg tega je Sodišče pri reviziji ugotovilo primere, pri katerih dodatna krepitev ne bo dosežena zaradi nadomestitve dodatnih sredstev iz sistematskega pregleda oz. evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva s sredstvi, ki so bila za te ukrepe namenjena že pred sistematskim pregledom (odstavki od 44 do 55).
RECOMMENDATION 3 Where it is the intention to earmark particular measures and budgetary allocations to target specific priorities, as was the case with the ‘Health Check’, to ensure that the funding has an additional effect the Commission should propose legislation to make this requirement specific in the underlying EU regulations. Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
PRIPOROČILO 3 Komisija naj za zagotovitev dodatnega učinka financiranja predlaga zakonodajo za vključitev te zahteve v povezane uredbe EU, kadar želi določene ukrepe in proračunska sredstva nameniti za posebne prednostne naloge, kot je bilo pri sistematskem pregledu. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev
All Member States (regions) audited require applicants to submit some level of proof of the economic viability of their holding and/or of the project proposal. 
Vse revidirane države članice (regije) so od vlagateljev zahtevale, naj predložijo nekatere dokaze o ekonomski upravičenosti svojega gospodarstva in/ali predloga projekta.
However, some Member States did not take the evidence obtained into account when evaluating the project application (paragraphs 56 to 59). 
Vendar nekatere države članice pri vrednotenju projektnih vlog pridobljenih dokazov niso upoštevale (odstavki od 56 do 59).
The Court found that the deadweight risk linked to the retroactive approval of investments which had already started persists (paragraphs 60 to 65). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da tveganje mrtvih izgub zaradi naknadne odobritve naložb, ki so se že izvajale, ni bilo odpravljeno (odstavki od 60 do 65).
This Report was adopted by Chamber I, headed by Mr Ioannis SARMAS, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 14 March 2012. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat I, ki ga vodi Ioannis SARMAS, član Računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju 14. marca 2012.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik PRIPOROČILO 5 Komisija naj spodbuja države članice k dobri praksi, v skladu s katero so odhodki za naložbe upravičeni šele od datuma odobritve donacije. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev
33 REPLY OF THE COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V. (a) According to Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the purpose of the measure is to modernise agricultural holdings by improving their economic performance through better use of production factors as well as improving the environmental, occupational safety, hygiene and animal welfare status of agricultural holdings. 
33 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE POVZETEK V. (a) V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1698/2005 je namen ukrepa posodobiti kmetijska gospodarstva za povečanje njihove gospodarske učinkovitosti s pomočjo boljše uporabe proizvodnih dejavnikov kot tudi za izboljšanje varovanja okolja, varstva pri delu ter higiene in dobrega počutja živali na kmetijskih gospodarstvih.
The Commission considers that when an investment improves the economic performance of the holding or improves the environmental, occupational safety, hygiene or animal welfare status, it fulfils the objective of the measure. 
Komisija meni, da naložba, ki poveča gospodarsko učinkovitost gospodarstva ali izboljša varovanje okolja, varstvo pri delu, higieno ali dobro počutje živali, izpolnjuje cilj ukrepa.
V. (c) Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 stipulates that, in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and shared management, selection criteria may be defined after programme approval in consultation with the Monitoring Committee and they are not subject to rural development programme (RDP) approval by the Commission. 
V. (c) Uredba (ES) št. 1698/2005 določa, da se lahko v skladu z načeloma subsidiarnosti in deljenega upravljanja izbirna merila opredelijo po odobritvi programa, in sicer po posvetovanju z nadzornim odborom, in niso odvisna od tega, da Komisija odobri program razvoja podeželja (PRP).
Selection criteria are not the only way to target the measure to objectives reflecting the structural and territorial needs and structural disadvantages as identified in the SWOT1 analysis of the RDP. 
Izbirna merila niso edini način za usmerjanje ukrepa v doseganje ciljev, ki odražajo strukturne in ozemeljske potrebe ter strukturne pomanjkljivosti, kot so opredeljene v analizi SWOT1 za PRP.
Targeting can also take the form of detailed eligibility rules, regional and sectoral differentiation, differentiation of aid intensities as well as aid ceilings by which Member State can make a preselection among potential beneficiaries. 
Ukrep je mogoče usmerjati tudi s podrobnimi pravili za upravičenost, regionalno in sektorsko diferenciacijo, diferenciacijo intenzivnosti pomoči ter zgornjih mej pomoči, s pomočjo katerih lahko države članice opravijo prvo selekcijo potencialnih upravičencev.
V. (d) The Commission considers that the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) is a valid instrument to monitor and evaluate progress towards achieving the EU's rural development policy objectives and turned out to have many strengths, although some difficulties were encountered. 
V. (d) Komisija meni, da je okvir skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja (CMEF) ustrezen instrument za spremljanje in vrednotenje napredka pri doseganju ciljev politike EU na področju razvoja podeželja in da se je izkazalo, da ima kljub nekaterim težavam veliko prednosti.
The Commission, Member States and various stakeholders devote much effort to continuously improving the system. 
Komisija, države članice in različne udeležene strani vlagajo veliko naporov v stalno izboljševanje sistema.
This experience is being used for the development of an improved monitoring and evaluation system for the next programming period. 
Ta izkušnja bo uporabljena za pripravo izboljšanega sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja za naslednje programsko obdobje.
1 Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 
1 „Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats“ – prednosti, slabosti, priložnosti in nevarnosti. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2012 – Usmerjanje pomoči za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev
34 V. (e) The legislator formulated Article 69(5a) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 so that an amount equal to the additional ‘Health Check’ and EERP2 resources shall be exclusively spent in the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2015 for operations of the types referred to in Article 16a of the regulation (‘new challenges’). 
34 V. (e) Zakonodajalec je v členu 69(5a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 določil, da se znesek, ki je enak dodatnim sredstvom iz naslova „sistematskega pregleda“ SKP in EERP2, porabi izključno v obdobju od 1. januarja 2010 do 31. decembra 2015 za vrste dejavnosti iz člena 16a navedene uredbe („novi izzivi“).
At the same time, additionality was not required in the aforementioned article. 
Ob tem v navedenem členu ni bila zahtevana tudi dodat-nost.
Where the amounts in relation to new challenges were deemed already appropriate by the Member States, they were given the possibility to transfer funds programmed before the ‘Health Check’/EERP period for the period 2010–15 to other measures or operations. 
Če so države članice menile, da so zneski, povezani z novimi izzivi, primerni, so imele možnost, da sredstva, programsko načrtovana pred obdobjem „sistematskega pregleda“ SKP/EERP, za obdobje 2010–2015 preusmerijo v druge ukrepe ali dejavnosti.
V. (f) A comprehensive assessment of the viability was deemed to be disproportionate for many types of investment projects and to create an unnecessary administrative burden and costs. 
V. (f) Pri veliko vrstah naložbenih projektov se je zdela izčrpna ocena ekonomske upravičenosti nesorazmerna, prav tako pa bi povzročila nepotrebno upravno obremenitev in nepotrebne stroške.
For the next programming period, the Commission has proposed to require a business plan for some measures that provide support for new economic activities (business start-up aid, including young farmers, non-agricultural activities in rural areas and development of small farms and support to producer groups) in order to ensure viability. V. (g) According to the Commission's proposals of September 2010 for the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 and according to the proposal for the next programming period, in respect of investment operations under measures falling within the scope of Article 42 of the Treaty, the Commission has proposed that only expenditure which has been incurred after an application has been submitted to the competent authority shall be considered eligible. 
Komisija je za naslednje programsko obdobje predlagala zahtevo po poslovnem načrtu za nekatere ukrepe, ki zagotavljajo podporo za nove gospodarske dejavnosti (pomoč za zagon podjetja, tudi za mlade kmete, nekmetijske dejavnosti na podeželju in razvoj malih kmetij ter podpora skupinam pridelovalcev), da bi zagotovila ekonomsko upravičenost. V. (g) V skladu s predlogi Komisije iz septembra 2010 za spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 in v skladu s predlogom za naslednje programsko obdobje je Komisija za naložbene dejavnosti, ki spadajo v obseg člena 42 Pogodbe, predlagala, naj se za upravičene štejejo samo odhodki, ki so nastali po tem, ko je bila vloga oddana pristojnemu organu.
2 European Economic Recovery Plan. 
2 Evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION VI. (a) According to the Commission's proposal for the next programming period3, strategic programming will be further reinforced, with the result of an improved strategic targeting through the Union priorities for rural development and their focus areas. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE VI. (a) V skladu s predlogom Komisije za naslednje programsko obdobje3 bo strateško načrtovanje programov še okrepljeno, kar bo prineslo boljše strateško ciljno usmerjanje prek prednostnih nalog Unije na področju razvoja podeželja in njihovih osrednjih področij.
The definition and application of selection criteria will be reinforced to ensure equal treatment of applicants, better use of financial resources and targeting of measures in accordance with the Union priorities for rural development. 
Opredelitev in uporaba izbirnih meril bosta okrepljeni, da se zagotovijo enaka obravnava vseh vlagateljev, boljša uporaba finančnih sredstev in ciljno usmerjanje ukrepov v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami Unije na področju razvoja podeželja.
The proposal provides for improved targeting to investment support to farm restructuring. 
Predlog zagotavlja boljše ciljno usmerjanje naložbene podpore za prestrukturiranje kmetij.
VI. (b) The monitoring and evaluation system is subject to review by the Commission and Member States in order to improve its efficiency and effectiveness and foster ownership by sharing good practices and building capacity. 
VI. (b) Komisija in države članice pregledujejo sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja, da bi izboljšale njegovo učinkovitost in uspešnost ter spodbudile občutek lastništva z izmenjevanjem dobrih praks in gradnjo zmogljivosti.
According to the Commission proposal for future rural development policy, quantified result indicators will be used to assess progress towards targets established ex ante at programme level. 
V skladu s predlogom Komisije za prihodnjo politiko razvoja podeželja se bodo za ocenjevanje napredka pri doseganju predhodno določenih ciljev na ravni programa uporabljali količinsko opredeljeni kazalniki rezultatov.
VI. (c) The Commission has proposed that Member States should have the possibility in the next programming period to design thematic subprogrammes, aimed to address specific needs, by earmarking particular measures and budgetary allocations and setting specific financial and indicator plans. 
VI. (c) Komisija je predlagala, naj imajo države članice v naslednjem programskem obdobju možnost pripraviti tematske podprograme, namenjene zadovoljevanju specifičnih potreb, z določanjem posebnih ukrepov in proračunskih dodelitev ter pripravljanjem finančnih načrtov in posebnih kazalnikov.
VI. (d) For the next programming period, the Commission has proposed to require a business plan for certain measures that provide support for new economic activities (business start-up aid, including young farmers, non-agricultural activities in rural areas and development of small farms and support to producer groups) in order to ensure viability. 
VI. (d) Komisija je za naslednje programsko obdobje predlagala zahtevo po poslovnem načrtu za določene ukrepe, ki zagotavljajo podporo za nove gospodarske dejavnosti (pomoč za zagon podjetja, tudi za mlade kmete, nekmetijske dejavnosti na podeželju in razvoj malih kmetij ter podpora skupinam pridelovalcev), da bi zagotovila ekonomsko upravičenost.
3 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), COM(2011) 627 final/2 of 19 October 2011. 
3 Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), COM(2011) 627 final/2 z dne 19. oktobra 2011.
Special Report No 8/2012 — Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings 35 VI. (e) In its proposal of September 2010 for the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 and in respect of investment operations under measures falling within the scope of Article 42 of the Treaty, the Commission has proposed that only expenditure which has been incurred after an application has been submitted to the competent authority shall be considered eligible. 
35 VI. (e) Komisija je v svojem predlogu iz septembra 2010 za spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005, in sicer za naložbene dejavnosti, ki spadajo v obseg člena 42 Pogodbe, predlagala, naj se za upravičene štejejo samo odhodki, ki so nastali po tem, ko je bila vloga oddana pristojnemu organu.
A similar requirement has been introduced in Article 67(2) of the Commission proposal for the next programming period. 
Podobna zahteva je bila uvedena v členu 67(2) predloga Komisije za naslednje programsko obdobje.
In this context, Member States may also provide in their programmes that only expenditure which has been incurred after the application for support has been approved by the competent authority shall be eligible. 
Države članice lahko v okviru tega v svojih programih določijo, da so upravičeni samo odhodki, ki so nastali po tem, ko je pristojni organ odobril vlogo za pomoč.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the purpose of the measure is to modernise agricultural holdings by improving their economic performance through better use of production factors as well as improving the environmental, occupational safety, hygiene and animal welfare status of agricultural holdings. 
1698/2005 je namen ukrepa posodobiti kmetijska gospodarstva za povečanje njihove gospodarske učinkovitosti s pomočjo boljše uporabe proizvodnih dejavnikov kot tudi za izboljšanje varovanja okolja, varstva pri delu ter higiene in dobrega počutja živali na kmetijskih gospodarstvih.
The Commission considers that when a project improves the economic performance of the holding or improves the environmental, occupational safety, hygiene or animal welfare status, it fulfils the objective of the measure. 
Komisija meni, da projekt, ki poveča gospodarsko učinkovitost gospodarstva ali izboljša varovanje okolja, varstvo pri delu, higieno ali dobro počutje živali, izpolnjuje cilj ukrepa.
Innovation, quality and diversification, are general EU priorities for the competitiveness objective, which is implemented through axis 1 as a whole. 
Inovacije, kakovost in diverzifikacija so splošne prednostne naloge EU za cilj konkurenčnosti, ki se izvaja skozi celotno 1. os.
The modernisation of agricultural holdings measure contributes to this objective by improving the competitiveness and environmental sustainability of the agricultural production. 
Ukrep za posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev prispeva k doseganju tega cilja z izboljšanjem konkurenčnosti in okoljske trajnosti kmetijske proizvodnje.
Not all investments should improve the farm's performance through all means to achieve the main objective of modernisation — each operation will be specific. 
Ni potrebno, da vse naložbe z vsemi sredstvi izboljšajo uspešnost kmetije, da bi bil dosežen glavni cilj posodobitve – vsaka dejavnost bo specifična.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 26. Second indent In the Luxembourg rural development programme, measure 121 clearly identifies objectives to be achieved based on the SWOT analysis included in the RDPs4. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 26., druga alinea V luksemburškem PRP so v ukrepu 121 jasno opredeljeni cilji, ki jih je treba doseči, in sicer na podlagi analize SWOT, ki je del PRP4.
Nevertheless, the Commission has insisted on the need for greater selectivity on the occasion of the annual meetings with the Luxembourg authorities. 
Komisija je na letnih sestankih z luksemburškimi organi kljub temu vztrajala, da je potrebna večja selektivnost.
Despite the fact that the RDP identifies clear objectives/needs/disadvantages, selection criteria and targeting could be further strengthened. 
Kljub temu, da so v PRP opredeljeni jasni cilji/ potrebe/pomanjkljivosti, bi bilo mogoče izbirna merila in usmerjanje še okrepiti.
29–38. Joint reply According to the principles of subsidiarity and shared management, project selection lies within the responsibility of Member States. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke od 29 do 38 V skladu z načeloma subsidiarnosti in deljenega upravljanja so za izbiranje projektov odgovorne države članice.