natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the latest Eurobarometer4 survey published in January 2016, more than four out of five EU respondents considered it is ‘justified’ to reduce farmers’ subsidy payments if they do not respect the rules. 
Glede na zadnjo javnomnenjsko raziskavo Eu-robarometer4, objavljeno januarja 2016, več kot 80 % anketirancev v EU meni, da je „upravičeno” znižati izplačila subvencij kmetom, kadar ti ne upoštevajo pravil.
05 As one of the instruments of the CAP, cross‐compliance is implemented through shared management, where tasks are shared between the Commission and Member States. 
05 Navzkrižna skladnost se kot eden od instrumentov SKP izvaja z uporabo deljenega upravljanja, pri katerem si Komisija in države članice delijo naloge.
In this context, the Commission’s responsibilities are: ‐ to follow the general EU framework established in the regulations issued by the European Parliament and Council, as well as the recommendations received from the European Parliament during the discharge of the annual accounts related to the implementation of the EU budget; ‐ to set‐up the detailed EU framework, through implementing and delegated regulations, as well as implementing guidelines for the Member States; ‐ to verify that the Member States carry out their responsibilities in accordance with the legal provisions, and to apply financial corrections when it is found that their systems are deficient; ‐ to check that the objectives of cross‐compliance are met and to report the results5. 
V tem okviru so naloge Komisije: – upoštevati splošni okvir EU, ki je bil vzpostavljen v uredbah Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ter priporočila glede izvrševanja proračuna EU, ki jih je prejela od Evropskega parlamenta v okviru razrešnice za zaključni račun, – vzpostaviti podroben okvir EU z izvedbenimi in delegiranimi uredbami ter izvedbenimi smernicami za države članice, – preverjati, ali države članice izvajajo svoje odgovornosti v skladu s pravnimi določbami, in uporabiti finančne popravke, če se ugotovi, da so njihovi sistemi pomanjkljivi, – preverjati, ali so cilji navzkrižne skladnosti doseženi, in poročati o rezultatih5.
06 DG ENV and DG SANTE are responsible for monitoring the implementation and the achievement of the objectives of the sectoral legislation from which SMRs are drawn, whereas DG AGRI is responsible for GAECs. 
06 GD ENV in GD SANTE sta odgovorna za spremljanje izvajanja sektorske zakonodaje, iz katere izhajajo predpisane zahteve ravnanja, in doseganja njenih ciljev, GD AGRI pa za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje.
DG AGRI performs audits to verify that Member States have adequate management of and control systems for cross‐compliance. 
Zadnji opravlja revizije, s katerimi preverja, ali imajo države članice ustrezne sisteme za upravljanje in kontrolo navzkrižne skladnosti.
07 Member States are responsible for adopting all the legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions to set‐up a national framework compliant with the EU general and detailed framework for cross‐compliance, and in particular for: ‐ putting in place systems which prevent, detect and correct instances of non‐compliance; ‐ carrying out on‐the‐spot checks of a sample of at least 1 % of farmers6; 4 ‘Special Eurobarometer 440 Europeans, Agriculture and the CAP’ released on 21 January 2016, reflecting the views taken between 17 and 26 October 2015 by TNS opinion & social, at the request of the European Commission. 
07 Države članice so odgovorne za sprejetje vseh zakonodajnih, regulativnih in upravnih določb za vzpostavitev nacionalnega okvira, ki je skladen s splošnim in podrobnim okvirom EU za navzkrižno skladnost, zlasti za: – vzpostavljanje sistemov za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in popravljanje primerov neupoštevanja pravil, – izvajanje pregledov na kraju samem za vzorec vsaj 1 % kmetov6, 4 Posebno poročilo Eurobarometer št. 440 z naslovom Europeans, Agriculture and the CAP (Evropejci, kmetijstvo in SKP), objavljeno 21. januarja 2016, odraža mnenja, ki jih je podjetje TNS Opinion & Social na zahtevo Evropske komisije zbralo med 17. in 26. oktobrom 2015.
All interviews were conducted face‐to‐face in the homes of randomly selected EU citizens. 
Anketiranje je bilo v celoti izvedeno osebno, na domovih naključno izbranih državljanov EU.
5 See, for example, the 2014 DG AGRI annual activity report, Annex 10, part 6 Cross compliance. 
5 Glej na primer del 6 Priloge 10 k letnemu poročilu o dejavnostih GD AGRI za leto 2014: Navzkrižna skladnost.
6 As a general rule, on‐the‐spot checks must be performed on a sample of minimum 1 % of CAP beneficiaries. 
6 Na splošno velja, da morajo biti pregledi na kraju samem izvedeni za vzorec vsaj 1 % upravičencev SKP.
For certain requirements however, such as the identification and registration of animals, the minimum control rate is 3 % of farmers, as foreseen in the sectoral legislation. 
Pri nekaterih zahtevah, kot sta identifikacija in registracija živali, pa je najmanjša stopnja kontrole 3 % kmetov, kot je predvideno v sektorski zakonodaji.
As a result, the total number of farmers checked for cross‐compliance exceeds in practice the 1 % sample. 
Zato skupno število kmetov, pri katerih se izvede pregled navzkrižne skladnosti, v praksi presega 1-odstotni vzorec.
For example, during the 2015 financial year the percentage of farmers checked was 2.31 %. 
V proračunskem letu 2015 je bil na primer odstotek kmetov, pri katerih se je izvedel pregled, 2,31 %.
For SMRs, Member States may decide to combine these checks with those done under the sectoral legislation in order to reach the 1 % control rate of cross‐compliance. 
V primeru predpisanih zahtev ravnanja se lahko države članice, da bi dosegle 1-odstotno stopnjo kontrole, ki velja za navzkrižno skladnost, odločijo te preglede povezati s tistimi, ki se opravijo v okviru sektorske zakonodaje.
Introduction 11 ‐ applying penalties and recovering unduly paid amounts from farmers who have breached the rules; ‐ reporting to the Commission (audited annual accounts, financial reports, and control statistics). 
Uvod 11 – nalaganje kazni in izterjavo neupravičeno izplačanih zneskov od kmetov, ki so kršili pravila, – poročanje Komisiji (revidirani zaključni računi, finančna poročila in kontrolni statistični podatki).
08 CAP beneficiaries must respect all the cross‐compliance rules as defined by the national legislation. 
08 Upravičenci SKP morajo upoštevati vsa pravila o navzkrižni skladnosti, kot so določena z nacionalno zakonodajo.
They risk having their annual EU payment reduced if they are found to be in breach of any of these rules, as a result of an act or omission directly attributable to them. 
Če se ugotovi, da kmetje zaradi dejanja ali opustitve, za katero so neposredno odgovorni, kršijo katero koli od teh pravil, se lahko njihovo letno plačilo EU zniža.
09 In 2008 we published a special report on the effectiveness of cross‐compliance7. 
09 Leta 2008 je Sodišče objavilo posebno poročilo o uspešnosti navzkrižne skla-dnosti7.
The report concluded that cross‐compliance had not been an effective policy, emphasising that the framework of cross‐compliance posed considerable difficulties, notably because of its complexity. 
V poročilu je prišlo do zaključka, da navzkrižna skladnost ni bila uspešna politika, in poudarilo, da je okvir navzkrižne skladnosti povzročil precejšnje težave predvsem zato, ker je bil preveč zapleten.
10 The simplification of the scope and rules related to the cross‐compliance system has been a constant subject of discussion between the Commission, the Council and the Member States, because of the complexity of the framework and the need to ensure that the rules can be checked and are sufficiently relevant for farming activity. 
10 Komisija, Svet in države članice pogosto razpravljajo o poenostavitvi področja uporabe in pravil za sistem navzkrižne skladnosti zaradi zapletenosti okvira in potrebe po zagotavljanju, da je pravila mogoče preveriti in da so dovolj relevantna za kmetijsko dejavnost.
Additional changes made for the current period 2014–2020 aimed9: ‐ to streamline the scope of the standards by organising them into a single list, grouped by areas and issues, to make the cross‐compliance system more consistent and more visible, and ‐ to remove from their scope a number of the requirements which were not sufficiently relevant to the farming activity or the area of the holding, or concerned national authorities rather than beneficiaries. 
Cilji dodatnih sprememb, ki so bile uvedene za sedanje obdobje 2014–2020, so bili9: – racionalizirati področje uporabe standardov tako, da se pripravi enoten seznam standardov po področjih in problematičnih vprašanjih, da bi sistem navzkrižne skladnosti tako postal doslednejši in preglednejši, ter – iz njihovega področja uporabe odstraniti več zahtev, ki niso bile dovolj relevantne za kmetijsko dejavnost ali območje kmetijskega gospodarstva ali so bolj zadevale nacionalne organe kot upravičence.
7 Special report No 8/2008 ‘Is cross‐compliance an effective policy?’ (http://eca.europa.eu). 
7 Posebno poročilo št. 8/2008 – Ali je navzkrižna skladnost uspešna politika? (http://eca. europa.eu).
8 Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 
8 Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št.
16) actually added two compulsory GAEC in the newly created area of protection and management of water and three new optional GAEC in the area of minimum level of maintenance of land; at the same time, four out of the existing GAEC as per Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 were made optional. 
16) sta bila nanovo uvedeno področje zaščite vodnih virov in upravljanja z njimi dodana dva obvezna standarda dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev, trije novi izbirni standardi dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev pa na področje minimalne ravni ohranjanja zemljišč, hkrati so štirje od obstoječih standardov dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev iz Uredbe (ES) št.
Minor changes have been noted also for SMR, whereby the requirement from Regulation (EC) No 2629/97 as regards eartags, holding registers and passports was removed. 
Do majhnih sprememb je prišlo tudi pri PZR, pri katerih je bila odpravljena zahteva iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2629/97 glede ušesnih znamk, registrov živali na gospodarstvih in potnih listov.
9 See Annex II for the detailed presentation of the changes introduced for the period 2014–2020. 
9 V Prilogi II so podrobno predstavljene spremembe, uvedene za obdobje 2014–2020.
Audit scope and approach 12 11 Simplification is a process that aims at streamlining rules, checks and reducing compliance costs. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski 12 pristop 11 Poenostavitev je postopek, ki je namenjen racionalizaciji pravil in pregledov ter omejitvi stroškov izpolnjevanja obveznosti.
Simplification measures, while relieving administrations and farmers of additional burdens, need to be balanced against the necessity to achieve the objectives of cross‐compliance. 
Ukrepi za poenostavitev sicer pomagajo odpravljati dodatno breme za upravne organe in kmete, vendar jih je treba uskladiti s potrebo po doseganju ciljev navzkrižne skladnosti.
12 We examined the cross‐compliance management and control system put in place by the Commission and the Member States to assess whether cross‐compliance is effective and to which extent simplification has been achieved under the new legal framework. 
12 Sodišče je preučilo sistem upravljanja in kontrole navzkrižne skladnosti, ki so ga vzpostavile Komisija in države članice, da bi ocenilo, ali je navzkrižna skladnost uspešna in kolikšna poenostavitev je bila dosežena v novem pravnem okviru.
13 The overall audit question was: ‘Is the cross‐compliance management and control system effective and can it be further simplified?’ 
13 Splošno revizijsko vprašanje je bilo: Je sistem upravljanja in kontrole navzkrižne skladnosti uspešen ter ali ga je mogoče dodatno poenostaviti?
The present report is structured along the two main aspects of effectiveness and simplification. 
To poročilo temelji na dveh glavnih vidikih, tj. uspešnosti in poenostavitvi.
14 We analysed the following evidence regarding implementation of cross‐compliance to date: ‐ the control statistics sent by the Member States to the Commission for the financial years 2011–2014. 
14 Sodišče je analiziralo naslednje dokaze glede dosedanjega izvajanja navzkrižne skladnosti: – kontrolne statistične podatke, ki so jih države članice posredovale Komisiji za proračunska leta 2011–2014.
These reports contained data related to the number of farmers checked for any given standard, the number of non‐compliances found, and the level and categories of penalties applied; ‐ the Court’s audits of legality and regularity (Statement of Assurance audits ‐ SoA) carried out in the financial years 2011–2014; ‐ conformity audits carried out by the Commission’s Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development (DG AGRI) in the financial years 2011–2014. 
Ta poročila so vsebovala podatke o številu kmetov, pri katerih je bilo preverjeno izpolnjevanje posameznega standarda, številu odkritih primerov neupoštevanja pravil ter ravni in kategorijah uporabljenih kazni, – revizije zakonitosti in pravilnosti (revizije za pripravo izjav o zanesljivosti), ki jih je Sodišče izvedlo v proračunskih letih 2011–2014, – revizije skladnosti, ki jih je izvedel Generalni direktorat Komisije za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja (GD AGRI) v proračunskih letih 2011–2014.
Audit scope and approach 13 15 We analysed information related to the management and control system put in place at Commission level, obtained through interviews with DG AGRI representatives and through the review of various analyses, studies and reports prepared or commissioned by DG AGRI. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 13 15 Sodišče je analiziralo informacije, ki so se nanašale na sistem upravljanja in kontrole navzkrižne skladnosti, uveden na ravni Komisije, in so bile pridobljene z razgovori s predstavniki GD AGRI ter s pregledi različnih analiz, študij in poročil, ki jih je pripravil ali naročil GD AGRI.
We also assessed the potential effects of the changes introduced for the CAP period 2014‐2020, on the basis of the following documents: preparatory impact assessment, approved Regulations and Commission statements. 
Ocenilo je tudi morebitne učinke sprememb, uvedenih za SKP za obdobje 2014–2020, in sicer na podlagi naslednjih dokumentov: pripravljalnih ocen učinka, odobrenih uredb in izjav Komisije.
16 We carried out two surveys covering topics such as: awareness, compliance and simplification. 
16 Izvedlo je dve anketi o temah, kot so: ozaveščenost, upoštevanje pravil in poenostavitev.
The surveys were sent to Paying Agencies and Farm Advisory Bodies. 
Anketi smo posredovali plačilnim agencijam in kmetijskim svetovalnim službam.
We received replies from the 6410 Paying Agencies surveyed in 27 Member States11, while 72 out of the 186 Farm Advisory Bodies contacted replied to the second survey. 
Odgovore je Sodišču poslalo vseh 6410 anketiranih plačilnih agencij iz 27 držav članic11, na drugo anketo pa je odgovorilo 72 od 186 kmetijskih svetovalnih služb, ki jim je bila poslana anketa.
17 We visited three regions in the Member States (Germany: Schleswig‐Holstein, Spain: Catalonia and United Kingdom: Northern Ireland), where we interviewed representatives of the Paying Agencies and farmers’ associations, to collect their views in relation to the impact of cross‐compliance at farm level. 
17 Sodišče je obiskalo tri regije v državah članicah (Schleswig-Holstein v Nemčiji, Katalonijo v Španiji in Severno Irsko v Združenem kraljestvu), v katerih smo opravili razgovore s predstavniki plačilnih agencij in združenj kmetov, da bi se seznanili z njihovimi pogledi na učinka navzkrižne skladnosti na ravni kmetij.
10 We surveyed 64 out of the 82 existing Paying Agencies, as in some Member States not all Paying Agencies have responsibilities for cross‐compliance. 
10 Anketa je bila poslana 64 od skupaj 82 plačilnih agencij, saj v nekaterih državah članicah nimajo vse plačilne agencije pristojnosti za navzkrižno skladnost.
11 Croatia was not included in the scope of this audit because of lack of historical data, due to its accession to the EU on 1 July 2013. 
11 Hrvaška ni bila vključena v obseg te revizije, ker zanjo ne obstajajo pretekli podatki, saj je k EU pristopila šele 1. julija 2013.
Observations 14 The information available did not allow the Commission to assess adequately the effectiveness of cross‐compliance 18 In the first part of the report, we examine whether the performance indicators used by the Commission gave a complete view of the effectiveness of cross‐compliance, whether they took into account the level of compliance of farmers and whether the Commission analysed the reasons for infringements and means to address them. 
Opažanja 14 Komisija na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij ni mogla 18 V prvem delu poročila je Sodišče preučilo, ali kazalniki smotrnosti, ki jih je uporabljala Komisija, dajejo celovit uvid v uspešnost navzkrižne skladnosti, ali je Komisija upoštevala raven izpolnjevanja obveznosti s strani kmetov in ali je analizirala razloge za kršitve in načine za njihovo obravnavanje.
The standards for our examinations are set out in paragraphs 19 to 21. 
Standardi našega preučevanja so opisani v odstavkih 19 do 21.
19 In order to measure the achievement of the cross‐compliance objectives (see paragraph 2), the Commission should define appropriate performance indicators12. 
19 Da bi lahko izmerila doseganje ciljev navzkrižne skladnosti (glej odstavek 2), bi morala Komisija opredeliti ustrezne kazalnike smotrnosti12.
These should be in line with sound financial management principles (economy, efficiency and effectiveness)13. 
Ti kazalniki bi morali biti v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja (tj. gospodarnost, učinkovitost in uspešnost)13.
The Commission should analyse and act upon performance issues. 
Komisija bi morala analizirati in obravnavati vprašanja smotrnosti.
20 Member States should also prevent, detect and deal effectively with any irregularities or non‐compliance with cross‐compliance obligations by farmers14 and report back annually on the results of their checks to the Commission. 
20 Poleg tega bi morale države članice preprečiti, odkriti in uspešno obravnavati vsako nepravilnost ali neizpolnjevanje obveznosti navzkrižne skladnosti s strani kmetov14 ter Komisiji vsako leto poročati o rezultatih svojih pregledov.
21 The effectiveness of cross‐compliance should be assessed by taking into account the level of compliance by farmers with the cross‐compliance rules, as a key indicator of the policy’s contribution to protecting the environment, public health, animal health, plant health and animal welfare. 
21 Uspešnost navzkrižne skladnosti bi bilo treba oceniti ob upoštevanju ravni izpolnjevanja obveznosti navzkrižne skladnosti s strani kmetov kot ključnega kazalnika prispevka politike k varstvu okolja, javnem zdravju, zdravju živali, zdravju rastlin in dobrobiti živali.
In order to make the policy more effective, the design of the cross‐compliance framework should include measures to identify and address the reasons why farmers do not comply with the rules. 
Za izboljšanje uspešnosti politike bi morala zasnova okvira navzkrižne skladnosti vključevati ukrepe za opredelitev in obravnavanje razlogov, zakaj kmetje ne upoštevajo pravil.
12 As per Recital 2 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 834/2014 of 22 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of the common monitoring and evaluation framework of the common agricultural policy (OJ L 230, 1.8.2014, p. 
834/2014 z dne 22. julija 2014 o določitvi predpisov za uporabo skupnega okvira spremljanja in vrednotenja skupne kmetijske politike (UL L 230, 1.8.2014, str.
13 Article 30 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 
13 V členu 30 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št.
1) (Financial Regulation) provides the following definitions: The principle of economy requires that the resources used by the institution in the pursuit of its activities shall be made available in due time, in appropriate quantity and quality and at the best price. 
1) (finančna uredba), so navedene naslednje opredelitve: Načelo gospodarnosti zahteva, da se sredstva, ki jih institucija uporablja za izvajanje svojih dejavnosti, dajo na voljo pravočasno, v primerni količini in primerni kakovosti ter za najugodnejšo ceno.
The principle of efficiency concerns the best relationship between resources employed and results achieved. 
Načelo učinkovitosti se nanaša na najboljše razmerje med uporabljenimi sredstvi in doseženimi rezultati.
The principle of effectiveness concerns the attainment of the specific objectives set and the achievement of the intended results. 
Načelo uspešnosti se nanaša na doseganje zadanih specifičnih ciljev in želenih rezultatov.
14 As per Recital 39 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. 
14 V skladu z uvodno izjavo 39 Uredbe (EU) št.
Observations 15 The performance indicators used by the Commission gave a partial view of the effectiveness of cross‐compliance The situation for the period 2007‐2013 22 For the first objective (to contribute to the development of sustainable agriculture through better awareness on the part of the beneficiaries of the need to respect the basic standards) the Commission used the indicator ‘Percentage of CAP payments covered by cross‐compliance’, which shows the proportion of CAP payments for which farmers have to comply with cross‐compliance rules. 
1306/2013. ustrezno oceniti uspešnosti navzkrižne skladnosti Opažanja 15 Kazalniki smotrnosti, ki jih je uporabljala Komisija, so omogočili le delen uvid v uspešnost navzkrižne skladnosti Stanje za obdobje 2007–2013 22 Komisija je za prvi cilj (tj. prispevati k razvoju trajnostnega kmetijstva z boljšo ozaveščenostjo deležnikov o potrebi po upoštevanju osnovnih standardov) uporabila kazalnik „odstotek plačil SKP, za katera se uporablja navzkrižna skla-dnost”, ki prikazuje delež plačil SKP, za katera morajo kmetje upoštevati pravila o navzkrižni skladnosti.
However, this indicator does not measure the farmers’ awareness of those rules or their level of compliance with them. 
Vendar ta kazalnik ne meri ozaveščenosti kmetov o teh pravilih ali ravni njihovega izpolnjevanja obveznosti.
23 To measure the second objective (to contribute to making the CAP more compatible with the expectations of society through improving the consistency of the CAP policy with the environment, public health, animal health, plant health and animal welfare policies), the indicator used was the ‘Opinion expressed by the public on cross‐compliance’, measured by the Commission in the Eurobarometer survey. 
23 Pri merjenju drugega cilja (tj. prispevati k večji skladnosti SKP s pričakovanji družbe z izboljšanjem skladnosti SKP s politikami s področja okolja, javnega zdravja, zdravja živali, zdravja rastlin in dobrobiti živali) je bil uporabljen kazalnik „mnenje javnosti o navzkrižni skladnosti”, ki ga je Komisija izmerila v javnomnenjski raziskavi Eurobarometer.
The question and answer options in the survey are shown in Box 1. 
Vprašanje in predlagani odgovori v anketi so prikazani v okviru 1.