natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, in 34 % of our sampled cases the Commission did not accept the first Member State reply in which the detailed actions taken by the Member State to address the shortcomings were laid down, as Member States did not provide the Commission with information sufficient in volume and in quality. 
Toda Komisija v 34 % vzorčenih primerov ni sprejela prvih odgovorov držav članic, v katerih so podrobno opisani ukrepi, ki so jih države članice sprejele za obravnavo pomanjkljivosti, saj države članice Komisiji niso zagotovile dovolj obsežnih in kakovostnih informacij.
This means that in these cases the reply provided by the Member State is such that these procedures need to be repeated. 
To pomeni, da je treba zaradi neustreznih odgovorov držav članic postopke ponoviti.
We also examined whether another reason for the long procedure could be that the Commission does not formulate its requirements specifically enough. 
Preučili smo tudi, ali bi lahko bil dodaten razlog za dolžino postopka to, da Komisija svoje zahteve ne ubesedi dovolj specifično.
However, our analysis showed that in nine out of ten cases, the Commission requests were specific enough for the Member State to undertake the required actions. 
Toda analiza Sodišča je pokazala, da so bile v devetih od desetih primerov zahteve Komisije dovolj specifične, da bi države članice lahko sprejele zahtevane ukrepe.
In addition, when financial corrections are set up, time is needed to determine the appropriate level of correction once the error has been accepted by the Member State. 
Pri uvedbi finančnih popravkov pa je potreben dodaten čas za ugotavljanje ustrezne ravni popravkov po tem, ko države članice sprejmejo napake.
In many cases the Commission agrees with the Member State concerned that additional checks should be carried out to establish the seriousness of the errors and the appropriate correction. 
Komisija se v mnogih primerih strinja z državami članicami, da je treba izvesti dodatna preverjanja za ugotovitev resnosti napak in določitev ustreznih popravkov.
Payment interruptions and suspensions represent a significant financial risk for Member States 90. 
Prekinitve in začasne ustavitve plačil pomenijo veliko finančno tveganje za države članice 90.
The Commission’s actions should make the OP’s management and control system more effective in preventing, detecting and correcting errors. 
Ukrepi Komisije bi morali privesti do tega, da bi bili sistemi upravljanja in kontrole operativnih programov uspešnejši pri preprečevanju, odkrivanju in opravljanju napak.
Such improvements are often made faster if there is a financial cost associated with not acting swiftly. 
Te izboljšave se pogosto izvedejo hitreje, če v nasprotnem primeru lahko pride do finančnih stroškov.
We therefore assessed the impact of the preventive measures at Member State and Commission level. 
Sodišče je zato ocenilo učinek preventivnih ukrepov na ravni držav članic in Komisije.
Payments interrupted or suspended for a significant share of programmes for between three and nine months 91. 
Plačila so bila prekinjena ali začasno ustavljena za bistven delež programov, in sicer za od tri do devet mesecev 91.
Until the end of 2015 the Commission interrupted the payment deadline for the amount corresponding to 10 % of all payments made for ERDF/CF and ESF34. Suspension decisions were issued for 15 % of all programmes. 
Do konca leta 2015 je Komisija prekinila rok izplačila za znesek, ki ustreza 10 % vseh plačil za ESRR/Kohezijski sklad in ESS.34 Sklep o začasni ustavitvi je bil sprejet za 15 % programov.
Moreover, payments to programmes or part of the programmes for the 2007‐2013 period were stopped due to interruptions and/or suspensions for more than eight months on average. 
Poleg tega so bila plačila za programe ali dele programov v obdobju 2007–2013 v povprečju prekinjena in/ali začasno ustavljena za več kot osem mesecev.
There were only five Member States (Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland and Ireland) where no OPs were interrupted or suspended. 
Samo v petih državah članicah (Hrvaška, Ciper, Danska, Finska in Irska) plačila za noben operativni program niso bila prekinjena ali začasno ustavljena.
For the vast majority of Member States the average period when payments to at least one of their programmes were withheld by the Commission due to interruptions and/or suspensions was between three and nine months. 
Za veliko večino držav članic je povprečno obdobje, v katerem je Komisija zadržala plačila za vsaj enega od njihovih programov zaradi prekinitev in/ali začasnih ustavitev, trajalo od tri do devet mesecev.
We calculated an overall median of 146 days for payment blockages. 
Sodišče je izračunalo splošno mediano 146 dni za ustavitve plačil.
In Italy and Spain, however, the average length was almost one year (see Table 3). 
V Italiji in Španiji pa so ustavitve v povprečju trajale skoraj eno leto (glej tabelo 3).
50 34 Data source: Annual activity reports of DG Regional and Urban Policy and DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion for years 2010 to 2015. Table 3 – Ageing table by Member State of average length of payment blockage to OPs in the 2007‐2013 programme period Note: The table shows the payment blockage per OP averaged for each Member State. 
Tabela 3 – Razvrstitev držav članic glede na povprečno trajanje ustavitve plačil operativnim programom v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 47 < 3 meseci 3–6 mesecev 6–9 mesecev > 9 mesecev Države članice Estonija Grčija Litva Poljska Švedska Francija Latvija Luksemburg Malta Nizozemska Portugalska Romunija Slovenija Združeno kraljestvo čezmejno sodelovanje Belgija Bolgarija Češka republika Nemčija Madžarska Avstrija Slovaška Španija Italija SKUPAJ 5 10 7 2 Opomba: V tabeli je ponazorjeno povprečno trajanje ustavitve plačil na operativni program za vsako državo članico.
Nor does it mean that all OPs for a given Member State were blocked, or that all blockages happened at the same time. 
Podatki ne pomenijo, da je do ustavitev prišlo pri vseh operativnih programih za posamezno državo članico, niti, da je do vseh ustavitev prišlo istočasno.
Source: European Court of Auditors based on information provided by the Commission. 
Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Komisija.
Preventive measures also incentivise Member States to improve their systems 93. 
Preventivni ukrepi so tudi spodbuda za države članice, da izboljšajo svoje sisteme 93.
Assuming an even payment rhythm and taking all expenditure in all 28 Member States together, for the 2007‐2013 programme period the Commission paid on average 110 million euros each day from the ERDF, CF and ESF35. 
Ob enakomernem ritmu plačil in ob upoštevanju vseh odhodkov v vseh 28 državah članicah skupaj je Komisija za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 v povprečju vsak dan plačala
This illustrates the potential monetary impact of delaying payments from the EU budget to the Member States, and in particular those countries receiving the bulk of the Cohesion spending. 
110 milijonov EUR iz ESRR, Kohezijskega sklada in ESS.35 To ponazarja potencialen monetarni učinek zadrževanja plačil državam članicam iz proračuna EU, zlasti v tistih državah, ki prejemajo večino kohezijske porabe.
When a payment deadline for a payment claim is interrupted or the interim payments or parts of them are suspended, Member States are not reimbursed by the Commission even if they submit payment claims. 
Kadar je rok izplačila zahtevka za plačilo prekinjen ali kadar so vmesna plačila ali deli vmesnih plačil začasno ustavljeni, države članice ne prejmejo povračila Komisije, tudi če oddajo zahtevke za plačilo.
During this period, Member States need to finance projects through their own budgets or payments to projects are stopped. 
V tem času morajo države članice projekte financirati iz svojih proračunov, ali pa so plačila projektom ustavljena.
However, if the Member State needs to finance projects from the national budget, it is still likely to cause cash flow problems due to the reduced volume of funds coming in. 
Toda če mora država članica projekte financirati iz nacionalnega proračuna, je verjetno, da bo to povzročilo probleme z likvidnostjo zaradi zmanjšane količine prejetih sredstev.
The situation can be aggravated if the volume of projects to be financed is significant and/or if the reasons for interruption or suspension are complex, resulting in lengthy remedial actions. 
To se lahko še zaostri, če so projekti, ki se financirajo, dragi in/ali če so razlogi za prekinitev ali začasno ustavitev kompleksni in privedejo do dolgotrajnih popravljalnih ukrepov.
Moreover, towards the end of the programme period the risk increases that the blocked expenditure may actually be lost. 
Poleg tega pa se proti koncu programskega obdobja poveča tveganje, da bo zadržano financiranje res izgubljeno.
Uncertainty about calls for payments can also lead to difficulties for the Commission in its budgetary management. 
Tudi negotovost v zvezi s pozivi za plačilo lahko Komisiji povzroči težave pri upravljanju proračuna.
On the one hand, the Commission may not be able to use the allocated payment appropriations. 
Po eni strani Komisija morda ne more porabiti dodeljenih odobritev plačil, po drugi strani pa ima lahko težave z izpolnjevanjem svojih plačilnih obveznosti, če se več prekinitev ali začasnih ustavitev plačil odpravi hkrati.
In addition, the Commission might face difficulties in planning payments and setting up the budget. 
Poleg tega ima Komisija lahko težave pri načrtovanju plačil in pripravi proračuna.
We examined whether to avoid such uncertainties, there could be a risk that a payment blockage was lifted before year end in order to avoid loss of funds by a Member State. 
Preučili smo, ali obstaja tveganje, da se zaradi preprečevanja takih negotovosti in izgube sredstev za države članice ustavitev plačil odpravi pred koncem leta.
Gradual lifting of measures by the Commission to ensure that expenditure can be reimbursed as soon as possible 97. 
49 Komisija postopno odpravlja ukrepe, da bi zagotovila, da se odhodki lahko čim prej povrnejo 97.
Blocking of payments usually affects either the whole programme or a part of it (e.g. a priority or several measures). 
Ustavitev plačil običajno vpliva na celoten program ali del programa (npr. prioriteta ali več ukrepov).
This also may lead to withholding payments of expenditure related to projects which may not be affected by the problems triggering the preventive measures but for which there is lack of assurance on the legality and regularity of the spending pending the Member State reply. 
To lahko vodi tudi do zadržanja plačil odhodkov, povezanih s projekti, na katere problemi, ki povzročijo uvedbo preventivnih ukrepov, sicer ne vplivajo, vendar v zvezi z njimi v obdobju čakanja na odgovor države članice ni zagotovil o zakonitosti in pravilnosti porabe.
During our file review we found several cases where the Commission, based on the information provided by Member States to ring‐fence problems applied a proportionate approach and gradually lifted its preventive measures so that the reimbursement of expenditure from the EU budget could be resumed as soon as possible for the part of the programme not affected by the shortcomings which initially led to the interruption or 52 suspension (Box 3). 
Sodišče je med pregledom dokumentacije odkrilo več primerov, v katerih je Komisija na podlagi informacij, ki so jih za zamejevanje problemov zagotovile države članice, uporabila sorazmeren pristop in postopoma odpravila svoje preventivne ukrepe, tako da je bilo mogoče čim prej znova začeti povračilo odhodkov iz proračuna EU za del programa, na katerega pomanjkljivosti, ki so prvotno povzročile prekinitev ali začasno ustavitev, niso vplivale (okvir 3).
The Commission faced difficulties in monitoring the Member States’ implementation of financial corrections and assessing the long‐term effects of the Commission’s corrective measures Information provided by the Member States on their implementation of financial corrections for the 2007‐2013 period did not allow for robust monitoring The Commission should ensure that the financial corrections imposed have been implemented by the Member States in full in all cases 99. 
Komisija je imela težave pri spremljanju tega, kako države članice izvajajo finančne popravke, in ocenjevanju dolgoročnih učinkov popravljalnih ukrepov Komisije Informacije, ki so jih zagotovile države članice o svojem izvajanju finančnih popravkov za obdobje 2007–2013, niso omogočale zanesljivega spremljanja Komisija bi morala zagotoviti, da so države članice v vseh primerih v celoti izvedle naložene finančne popravke 99.
For the 2007‐2013 period, the Commission relies on certificates or letters sent by certifying authorities to ascertain that the agreed amount of financial correction has been deducted by the Member State from its payment claim so that the subsequent interim payment can be authorised. 
Za obdobje 2007–2013 se je Komisija pri ugotavljanju tega, ali je država članica na svojem zahtevku za plačilo odštela dogovorjen znesek finančnega popravka, da se lahko odobri nadaljnje vmesno plačilo, zanašala na potrdila ali dopise, ki so jih poslali organi za potrjevanje.
The format and the content of these documents are not governed by any rules or guidelines, they contain information that the given certifying authority considers relevant. 
Za obliko in vsebino teh dokumentov ne veljajo nobena pravila ali smernice, zato vsebujejo informacije, za katere zadevni organ za potrjevanje meni, da so relevantne.
In some of the cases examined, the information received by the Commission was insufficient for it to check the execution of financial corrections. 
V nekaterih preučenih primerih informacije, ki jih je prejela Komisija, niso zadostovale za preverjanje izvajanja finančnih popravkov.
been deducted in full. So far, the Commission has also not systematically asked them to do so. 
Doslej jih Komisija tudi ni sistematično prosila, naj to storijo, zato ni imela neodvisne potrditve o tem, kako so bili finančni popravki izvedeni v praksi.
This was particularly the case in the early years of the programme period. 
To je veljalo zlasti v prvih letih programskega obdobja.
Shortcomings in the Member States’ reporting on withdrawals and recoveries during the 2007‐2013 period identified by the Commission 101. 
Komisija je ugotovila pomanjkljivosti v poročanju držav članic o preklicih in izterjavah v obdobju 2007–2013 101.
In the 2007‐2013 programme period, Member States were required to send a statement to the Commission each year identifying the amounts withdrawn, recovered, to be recovered and irrecoverable37. This report covers financial corrections imposed by the Commission and those imposed by the Member States themselves. 
Države članice so morale v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 Komisiji vsako leto poslati izkaz, v katerem so navedeni preklicani in izterjani zneski, zneski, ki jih je treba izterjati, ter neizterljivi zneski.37 To poročilo zajema finančne popravke, ki so jih naložile Komisija in 37 50 Člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št.
In 2010, the European Parliament and the Council asked the Commission to provide information on the Member States’ corrective capacity for the 2007‐2013 programme period38. 102. 
Evropski parlament in Svet sta Komisijo leta 2010 pozvala, naj predloži informacije o popravni zmogljivosti držav članic za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.38 102.
Between 2011 and 2015 the Commission conducted 47 audits on recoveries covering 19 Member States and 113 OPs selected on the basis of risk. 
Med letoma 2011 in 2015 je Komisija izvedla 47 revizij izterjav, ki so zajemale 19 držav članic in 113 operativnih programov, izbranih na podlagi tveganja.
For 72 of these 113 OPs the Commission detected important shortcomings. 
Komisija je pri 72 od teh 113 operativnih programov odkrila pomembne pomanjkljivosti.
Our analysis of all reports related to these audits showed that the shortcomings were in particular related to (a) the management of irregularities by the national authorities (60 %). 
Analiza vseh poročil v zvezi s temi revizijami, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, je pokazala, da so bile pomanjkljivosti zlasti povezane s (a) tem, kako so nacionalni organi obravnavali nepravilnosti (60 %).
In several Member States the time periods between the detection of an irregularity and its registration in the management information system, and/or the registration of an irregularity and the decision to withdraw or recover the related amounts were considered too long; (b) the completeness and correctness of the Article 20 reports submitted by the Member States (40 %). 
V več državah članicah je bil čas med odkritjem nepravilnosti in njenim evidentiranjem v informacijski sistem upravljanja in/ali čas med evidentiranjem nepravilnosti in odločitvijo o preklicu ali izterjavi z njo povezanih zneskov veliko predolg; (b) popolnostjo in pravilnostjo poročil iz člena 20, ki so jih predložile države članice (40 %).
54 amounts of withdrawals, recoveries, pending recoveries and irrecoverable amounts or reported amounts which had never been certified and declared to the Commission or which did not relate to irregularities, but to administrative/clerical mistakes or to projects which were no longer (or had never been) part of the OP; and (c) inadequate recovery procedures (15 %). 
V teh primerih države članice niso poročale o vseh relevantnih zneskih preklicev, izterjav, nerešenih izterjavah in neizterljivih zneskih ali pa so poročale o zneskih, ki nikoli niso bili potrjeni in prijavljeni Komisiji ali ki se niso nanašali na nepravilnosti, temveč na administrativne/pisne napake ali na projekte, ki niso več (ali nikoli niso bili) del operativnega programa; (c) neustreznimi postopki za izterjavo (15 %).
Cases were observed where irregular amounts were not recovered from the beneficiaries, or the certifying authority did not ensure the proper follow‐up of the recovery measures taken by the managing authority. 
Opaženi so bili primeri, v katerih nepravilni zneski niso bili izterjani od upravičencev ali v katerih organ za potrjevanje ni zagotovil ustreznega nadaljnjega spremljanja ukrepov za izterjavo, ki jih je sprejel organ upravljanja.
We note that the Directorates‐General for Regional and Urban Policy and for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion apply similar methodologies to account for unreliable data on financial corrections reported by the Member States. 
Ugotovili smo, da generalna direktorata za regionalno in mestno politiko ter za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje uporabljata podobne metodologije za obravnavo nezanesljivih podatkov o finančnih popravkih, ki jih sporočijo države članice.
Overall, for 2015, the Commission estimates that around 9 % of the amounts reported for ERDF/CF and 4 % reported for ESF are unreliable. 
Komisija ocenjuje, da je bilo v letu 2015 nezanesljivih približno 9 % sporočenih zneskov za ERSS/Kohezijski sklad in 4 % sporočenih zneskov za ESS.
Overall, the Commission audits indicated that significant improvements need to be made by Member States to improve their reporting on the amounts withdrawn, recovered, to be recovered and irrecoverable during the 2007‐2013 period. 
Na splošno so revizije, ki jih je izvedla Komisija, pokazale, da morajo države članice uvesti pomembne spremembe za izboljšanje svojega poročanja o preklicanih in izterjanih zneskih, zneskih, ki jih je treba izterjati, in neizterljivih zneskih v obdobju 2007–2013.
Our own work also indicates that Member State reporting on financial corrections is not sufficiently reliable39. This risk will however be mitigated in the 2014‐2020 programme period (see paragraphs 124 to 126). 
Delo Sodišča je pokazalo tudi, da poročanje držav članic o finančnih popravkih ni dovolj zanesljivo.39 To tveganje pa bo v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 zmanjšano (glej odstavke 124 do 126).
Mixed evidence on the long‐term impact of preventive measures and financial corrections on the error level of a programme during the 2007‐2013 period 106. 
Mešani dokazi o dolgoročnem učinku preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov na stopnjo napake v programu v obdobju 2007–2013 106.
The error rates reported by audit authorities in the Member States for each OP (or group of OPs) and validated each year by the Commission can be considered as an indicator of the effectiveness of the Member States’ management and control systems to prevent and detect errors. 
Stopnje napake, o katerih poročajo revizijski organi v državah članicah za vsak operativni program (ali skupino operativnih programov) in jih Komisija vsako leto potrdi, se lahko razumejo kot kazalnik uspešnosti sistemov upravljanja in kontrole pri preprečevanju in odkrivanju napak.
If these systems work effectively, the level of irregular expenditure should be below materiality. 
Če ti sistemi uspešno delujejo, bi morala biti raven nepravilnih odhodkov pod pragom pomembnosti.
annual activity reports and are a key element in the Commission’s assessment of the management and control systems. 
O teh potrjenih stopnjah napake, ki so ključni element ocene sistemov upravljanja in kontrole, ki jo opravi Komisija, generalni direktorati poročajo v svojih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih.
If the Commission’s preventive measures and financial corrections are effective, the validated error rates of an OP (or group of OPs) should in general decrease in the long term subsequent to the Commission’s action. 
Če so preventivni ukrepi in finančni popravki Komisije uspešni, bi se morale potrjene stopnje napak za posamezen operativni program (ali skupino operativnih programov) po ukrepanju Komisije dolgoročno v splošnem zmanjšati.
For the 20 OPs selected, we therefore examined the relationship between the evolution of validated error rates and the Commission’s preventive measures and confirmed financial corrections (see Table 4). 
Zato je Sodišče za 20 izbranih operativnih programov preučilo razmerje med razvojem potrjenih stopenj napake ter preventivnimi ukrepi in potrjenimi finančni popravki Komisije (glej tabelo 4).
Our analysis showed that preventive measures and financial corrections have a mixed long term impact on the error levels of an OP (or group of OPs). 
Analiza Sodišča je pokazala, da imajo preventivni ukrepi in finančni popravki mešan dolgoročni učinek na stopnje napake za posamezen operativni program (ali skupino operativnih programov).
Based on our analysis, we grouped the OPs examined into three categories: (a) for around one third of the programmes, the OPs (or group of OPs) had validated error rates below the Commission’s 2 % materiality level (seven out of 20); (b) for one fifth the error level was significantly lower than before the Commission took action (four out of 20); and (c) for nearly half of the programmes, there was no evidence that the Commission’s actions had resulted in a decrease in the validated error rates (nine out of 20). 
Na podlagi te analize je Sodišče preučene operativne programe razvrstilo v tri kategorije: (a) v približno tretjini primerov so imeli operativni programi (ali skupine operativnih programov) potrjene stopnje napake pod 2-odstotnim pragom pomembnosti, ki ga uporablja Komisija (sedem od 20); (b) pri petini operativnih programov (ali skupin operativnih programov) je bila stopnja napake bistveno nižja kot pred ukrepanjem Komisije (štirje od 20); (c) pri skoraj polovici operativnih programov (ali skupin operativnih programov) pa ni bilo dokazov, da je ukrepanje Komisije privedlo do znižanja potrjene stopnje napake (devet od 20).
Table 4 ‐ Impact of the Commission’s action on the programmes’ error rates in subsequent years 4 Source: European Court of Auditors based on information provided by the Commission. 
Tabela 4 – Učinek ukrepanja Komisije na stopnje napake operativnih programov (ali skupin operativnih programov) v letih po ukrepanju 4 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Komisija.
From our point of view however the validated error rates are not a perfect indicator of the long‐term effectiveness of the Commission’s preventive measures and financial 56 Category Number of OPs 1. 
Po mnenju Sodišča pa potrjene stopnje napake niso najboljši kazalnik dolgoročne uspešnosti preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov Komisije, predvsem zato, ker se nanašajo na celotne operativne programe (ali skupine operativnih programov).