natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court made recommendations to develop the case management system (CMS) as a management tool, to increase training of investigators in investigation techniques, legislation and report-writing skills (recommendation 10) and to implement a masterplan for personnel management in order to resolve structural problems (recommendation 12). 
Sodišče je priporočilo razvoj sistema vodenja primerov (CMS) kot upravljavskega orodja, povečanje usposabljanja preiskovalcev na področjih preiskovalnih tehnik, zakonodaje in pisanja poročil (priporočilo 10) in izvajanje glavnega načrta za upravljanje kadrovskih virov, da bi se rešili strukturni problemi (priporočilo 12).
CMS is now better used and all key documents are recorded in the system. 
CMS se zdaj več uporablja in v njem so evidentirani vsi ključni dokumenti.
However, data protection information is not systematically completed. 
Vendar informacije o varstvu podatkov niso sistematično vnesene.
In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/200119, a decision should be taken either to inform natural persons that their personal data are stored and treated by OLAF (recorded as ‘provided’ on CMS) or else to defer informing them (recorded as ‘deferred’ on CMS), because, for example, to do so could jeopardise the investigation. 
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/200119 je treba bodisi sprejeti odločitev, da se fizične osebe obvestijo, da OLAF hrani in obdeluje njihove podatke (v CMS evidentirano kot „zagotovljeno“), bodisi odložiti obvestitev fizičnih oseb (v CMS evidentirano kot „odloženo“), ker bi to lahko na primer ogrozilo preiskavo.
However, in five of the 30 investigations examined, a decision whether or not to inform the suspect had not been taken. 
Vendar v petih od 30 preučenih preiskav ni bila sprejeta odločitev o tem, ali se osumljenca obvesti ali ne.
Furthermore, the Court recalls that the data protection regulation requires personal data to be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date20. 
Poleg tega Sodišče opozarja, da uredba o varstvu podatkov določa, da morajo biti osebni podatki točni in, kadar je to nujno, do dneva osveženi20.
In this respect, the Court notes that when an investigation is closed without follow-up and the initial allegations could not be substantiated, the CMS does not reflect such a development in the categorisation of the person concerned. 
Sodišče v tem pogledu opaža, da se v primeru, ko je preiskava zaključena brez nadaljnjega ukrepanja in ko prvotnih obtožb ni bilo mogoče utemeljiti, takšen razvoj kategorizacije zadevne osebe ne odraža v sistemu CMS.
The advice of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) is needed on the matter. 
Glede tega je potreben nasvet Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov.
Concerning training, Figure 7 illustrates the number of OLAF staff attending training events on investigation techniques, legislation and report-writing skills since 2004 and shows an increase in the number of participants at training events in 2009. 
Kar zadeva usposabljanje, je v diagramu 7 prikazano število uslužbencev OLAF, ki so se od leta 2004 udeležili usposabljanj o preiskovalnih tehnikah, zakonodaji in pisanju poročil, ter povečanje števila udeležencev usposabljanj v letu 2009.
The January 2009 report on training by OLAF’s Internal Audit Capability reinforced the messages of Special Report No 1/2005 and stressed the need to improve the analysis of training needs. 
Poročilo o usposabljanju, ki ga je januarja 2009 pripravil oddelek OLAF za notranjo revizijo, je okrepilo sporočila iz Posebnega poročila št. 1/2005 in poudarilo potrebo po boljši analizi potreb po usposabljanju.
Structural problems in staffing have been addressed by obtaining additional permanent posts and thus reducing the number and proportion of temporary staff (see Table 4). 
Strukturni problemi pri zaposlovanju so se reševali s pridobitvijo dodatnih stalnih delovnih mest, s čimer sta se zmanjšala število in delež začasnih uslužbencev (glej tabelo 4).
19 Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 
45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. septembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str.
20 Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. 
20 Člen 4(1) Uredbe (ES) št.
23 FIGURE 7 TABLE 4 Year Permanent posts Temporary posts Total posts % temporary posts 2004 183 146 329 44 % 2005 201 146 347 42 % 2006 238 119 357 33 % 2007 252 116 368 32 % 2008 261 116 377 31 % 2009 270 114 384 30 % 2010 282 102 384 27 % TRAINING EVENTS ATTENDED BY OLAF STAFF 900 10 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 00 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Report writing Legislation Investigation techniques Average training days by OLAF staff (right hand axis) Source: OLAF. 
1/2005 o upravljanju Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) 23 DIAGRAM 7 TABELA 4 Leto Stalna delovna mesta Začasna delovna mesta Delovna mesta skupaj % začasnih delovnih mest 2004 183 146 329 44 % 2005 201 146 347 42 % 2006 238 119 357 33 % 2007 252 116 368 32 % 2008 261 116 377 31 % 2009 270 114 384 30 % 2010 282 102 384 27 % USPOSABLJANJA, KI SO SE JIH UDELEŽILI USLUŽBENCI OLAF 900 10 Vir: OLAF.
REDUCTION IN PROPORTION OF TEMPORARY POSTS1 1 In addition to the establishment of 384 posts there were also 131 contract staff in March 2010, including 65 working in Information Services in Directorate D. Source: OLAF. Special Report No 2/2011 — Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office Number of event participants Training days 
800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 00 2004 2005 2006 Pisanje poročil Povprečno število dni usposabljanj uslužbencev OLAF (desna os) Zakonodaja Preiskovalne tehnike 2007 2008 2009 ZMANJŠANJE DELEŽA ZAČASNIH DELOVNIH MEST1 1 Poleg 384 delovnih mest je bilo marca 2010 tudi 131 pogodbenih uslužbencev, vključno s 65, ki so delali v informacijskih službah v direktoratu D. Vir: OLAF. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2011 – Nadaljnje ukrepanje po Posebnem poročilu št.
24 REVISION OF THE LEGAL AND PROCEDURAL FRAMEWORK STILL PENDING 38. 
24 PRAVNI IN POSTOPKOVNI OKVIR ŠE NI PRENOVLJEN 38.
Regarding the legal and procedural framework, the Court made a recommendation to codify and publish procedures to protect the rights of individuals at all stages of the investigation and to provide controls on the legality of investigative acts in progress (recommendation 8). 
Kar zadeva pravni in postopkovni okvir, je Sodišče priporočilo kodiranje in objavo postopkov za zaščito pravic posameznikov v vseh fazah preiskave in zagotovitev kontrol zakonitosti tekočih preiskovalnih dejanj (priporočilo 8).
In December 2009, the Director of OLAF adopted a new Manual of Operational Procedures which was published in May 2010. 
Decembra 2009 je direktor OLAF sprejel nov priročnik za operativne postopke, ki je bil objavljen maja 2010.
The legal framework, however, has not changed since the Court’s last report, as the instructions contained in the Manual are not intended to have any legal force21 and as Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by OLAF has not been amended22. 
Vendar se pravni okvir od zadnjega poročila Sodišča ni spremenil, saj navodila iz priročnika niso mišljena kot pravno veljavna21, prav tako pa ni bila spremenjena Uredba (ES) št. 1073/1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam22.
There is still no independent control of the legality of investigative acts in progress23 nor is there a code guaranteeing that investigative acts follow a predictable course, that there is certainty about the timing of hearings and that, at each key stage of the enquiry, the rights to a fair hearing of the person under investigation are protected along with the right of access to the file24. 
Še vedno ni neodvisne kontrole zakonitosti tekočih preiskovalnih dejanj23 niti ni kodeksa, ki bi zagotavljal, da preiskovalna dejanja potekajo po predvidljivem vrstnem redu, da obstaja gotovost glede časovnega razporeda zaslišanj in da se v vsaki ključni fazi preiskave varuje pravica preiskovane osebe do pravičnega zaslišanja skupaj s pravico do dostopa do dosjeja24.
The Court made a recommendation to clarify arrangements for cooperation with Member States’ authorities by adopting a specific regulation or through agreements with national investigation services (recommendation 9). 
Sodišče je priporočilo, naj se ureditve za sodelovanje z organi držav članic pojasnijo s sprejetjem posebne uredbe ali s sporazumi, sklenjenimi z nacionalnimi preiskovalnimi službami (priporočilo 9).
21 See the foreword to the Manual which is available on OLAF’s website. 
21 Glej predgovor k priročniku, ki je na voljo na spletni strani OLAF.
22 The Commission proposal (COM(2006) 244 final of 24.5.2006) for amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 has not yet been adopted. 
22 Predlog Komisije (COM(2006) 244 konč. z dne 24.5.2006) za spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1073/1999 še ni bil sprejet.
On this proposal, the Court issued Opinion No 7/2006 (OJ C 8, 12.1.2007, p. 
Sodišče je o tem predlogu izdalo Mnenje št. 7/2006 (UL C 8, 12.1.2007, str.
23 See paragraph 83 of SR No 1/2005. 
23 Glej odstavek 83 Posebnega poročila št. 1/2005.
24 Opinion No 5/2010 of the OLAF Supervisory Committee on the respect for fundamental rights and procedural guarantees in investigations. 
24 Mnenje nadzornega odbora OLAF št.
In 2006, the Commission made a revised proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance25 which has not yet been adopted by Parliament and Council. 
Komisija je leta 2006 podala spremenjen predlog za uredbo o medsebojni upravni pomoči25, ki ga Parlament in Svet še nista sprejela.
OLAF has signed administrative cooperation arrangements with authorities in 10 Member States and negotiations are currently underway with four others26. 
OLAF je podpisal sporazume o upravnem sodelovanju z organi v desetih državah članicah, pogajanja pa potekajo še s štirimi26.
However, several Member States have not communicated to OLAF which national authority or investigation service is in charge of cooperation with OLAF in the field of direct expenditure or have not set up the necessary national and judiciary authorities with competences for the field of direct expenditure. 
Vendar več držav članic OLAF ni sporočilo, kateri nacionalni organ ali preiskovalna služba je odgovorna za sodelovanje z OLAF na področju neposrednih odhodkov, ali pa niso ustanovile potrebnih nacionalnih in sodnih organov s pristojnostmi za področje neposrednih odhodkov.
Therefore, OLAF continues to encounter difficulties and lack of support when carrying out on-the-spot checks and inspections in certain Member States, notably where national inspectors do not have the control competences referred to in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/9627. 
Zato se OLAF še naprej sooča s težavami in pomanjkanjem podpore pri izvajanju pregledov na kraju samem in inšpekcij v nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti kjer nacionalni inšpektorji nimajo kontrolnih pristojnosti, navedenih v Uredbi (Euratom, ES) št.
The audit confirmed the observations of the Court in its Opinion No 8/2005 that the existing legal framework for combating fraud and irregularities is complicated and difficult to implement and that weaknesses persist in cooperation between the Commission and Member States28. 
Ta revizija je potrdila opažanja Sodišča iz njegovega mnenja št. 8/2005, da je obstoječi pravni okvir za boj proti goljufijam in nepravilnostim zapleten in težek za izvajanje ter da obstajajo slabosti v sodelovanju med Komisijo in državami članica-mi28.
The audit also confirmed that given the limitations of OLAF’s powers to investigate, the response of Member States to the Office’s requests remain weak29. 
Prav tako je potrdila, da je glede na omejitve preiskovalnih pooblastil OLAF, odziv držav članic na njegove zahteve še vedno šibek29.
Difficulties may also arise when allegations under investigation by OLAF involve economic operators from several Member States. 
Težave lahko nastanejo tudi, kadar se obtožbe, ki jih preiskuje OLAF, nanašajo na gospodarske subjekte iz več držav članic.
In such cases, cooperation with Eurojust becomes important, as Eurojust is responsible for coordinating national criminal investigations and prosecution procedures. 
V takšnih primerih postane sodelovanje z Eurojustom pomembno, saj je ta odgovoren za usklajevanje nacionalnih kazenskih preiskav in postopkov pregona.
To make cooperation as efficient as possible, a Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation between Eurojust and OLAF was signed on 24 September 200830. 
Da bi bilo sodelovanje čim bolj učinkovito, sta Eurojust in OLAF 24. septembra 2008 podpisala Praktični dogovor o načinu sodelovanja med Eurojustom in OLAF30.
The Practical Agreement requires OLAF to inform Eurojust as soon as possible of the existence of any case where it appears that it directly involves judicial cooperation between the competent national authorities of two or more Member States, or where the case concerns a Member State and the Community. 
Praktični dogovor določa, da mora OLAF takoj, ko je mogoče, Eurojust obvestiti o vsakem primeru, pri katerem se zdi, da neposredno zajema sodno sodelovanje pristojnih nacionalnih organov dveh ali več držav članic, ali pa se ta nanaša na državo članico in Skupnost.
On the basis of the Court’s sample, some 20 % of investigations fall into these categories. 
Glede na vzorec Sodišča sodi v ti kategoriji približno 20 % preiskav.
Although quarterly meetings take place between OLAF and Eurojust as required by the agreement, practical cooperation in the form of transmission of information on cases has been limited. 
Čeprav se OLAF in Eurojust v skladu z dogovorom sestaneta vsake tri mesece, pa je praktično sodelovanje v obliki prenosa informacij o primerih omejeno.
In 2008 information on five cases was transmitted from OLAF to Eurojust and in 2009 on just one case. 
Leta 2008 je OLAF Eurojustu posredoval informacije o petih primerih, leta 2009 pa samo o enem.
25 COM(2006) 473 final of 14.9.2006. 
25 COM(2006) 473 konč. z dne 14.9.2006.
26 Arrangements are in place with authorities in the following Member States: Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Spain, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, Romania, Slovak Republic. 
26 Ureditve so vzpostavljene z organi naslednjih držav članic: Belgija, Bolgarija, Češka, Estonija, Španija, Italija, Litva, Malta, Romunija, Slovaška.
Negotiations are ongoing with authorities in Denmark, Latvia, Germany and the United Kingdom. 
Pogajanja potekajo z organi Danske, Latvije, Nemčije in Združenega kraljestva.
27 Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities’ financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 2). 
2185/96 z dne 11. novembra 1996 o pregledih in inšpekcijah na kraju samem, ki jih opravlja Komisija za zaščito finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi nepravilnostmi (UL L 292, 15.11.1996, str. 2).
28 See paragraphs 34–36 of Opinion No 8/2005 (OJ C 313, 9.12.2005, p. 
28 Glej odstavke 34–36 Mnenja št. 8/2005 (UL C 313, 9.12.2005, str.
1) 29 See paragraph 15 of SR No 1/2005. 
1). 29 Glejodstavek15Posebnega poročila št.
30 OJ C 314, 9.12.2008, p. 
30 UL C 314, 9.12.2008, str.
Article 85 of the TFEU provides for an extension of the role of Eurojust to initiating investigations. 
Člen 85 PDEU določa razširitev vloge Eurojusta na uvedbo kazenskih preiskav.
In this regard, the Court notes the recommendations adopted by the European Council in December 2009 on the possibility of furthering the powers of Eurojust national members, reinforcing of the powers of the Eurojust College or the setting-up of a European Public Prosecutor31. 
Sodišče glede tega upošteva priporočila, ki jih je decembra 2009 sprejel Evropski svet o možnosti nadaljnje krepitve pooblastil nacionalnih članov Eurojusta, krepitve pooblastil kolegija Eurojusta in vzpostavitve evropskega javnega tožilstva31.
More effective cooperation between OLAF and Eurojust is necessary in view of developments in this direction. 
Glede na razvoj dogodkov na tem področju je potrebno bolj uspešno sodelovanje med OLAF in Eurojustom.
REPORTING ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INVESTIGATIONS 45. 
POROČANJE O USPEŠNOSTI PREISKAV 45.
The audit assessed whether the action taken by OLAF had resulted in clear objectives for investigations and relevant and reliable reports on performance. 
Med revizijo je bilo ocenjeno, ali so ukrepi, ki jih je sprejel OLAF, privedli do jasnih ciljev za preiskave ter relevantnih in zanesljivih poročil o uspešnosti.
The Court made a recommendation to specify results to be achieved by investigations and to introduce performance indicators (recommendation 1). 
Sodišče je priporočilo, naj se natančno določijo želeni rezultati preiskav in uvedejo kazalniki uspešnosti (priporočilo 1).
For the Office as a whole, certain sectors and geographical areas, OLAF now sets objectives in the Annual Management Plan with clearly quantified targets. 
OLAF zdaj za Urad kot celoto, določene sektorje in geografska območja določi cilje v letnem načrtu upravljanja z jasnimi količinsko opredeljenimi cilji.
These targets are monitored in monthly updates of the Annual Management Plan32 and further information is provided in monthly management reports33. 
Ti se spremljajo v mesečnih posodobitvah letnega načrta upravljanja32, dodatne informacije pa so zagotovljene v mesečnih poročilih o upravljanju33.
Concerning individual investigations, the initial assessment did not systematically identify clear financial objectives for investigations. 
Kar zadeva posamezne preiskave, pri oceni začetnih informacij niso bili sistematično opredeljeni jasni finančni cilji za preiskave.
Although the amounts affected are not always the key concern, the initial assessment of information received should identify the possible financial impact and recovery. 
Čeprav zadevni zneski niso vedno glavna skrb, pa bi bilo treba pri oceni prejetih začetnih informacij opredeliti možen finančni učinek in izterjavo.
31 See Stockholm Programme adopted by the European Council in December 2009 Council document 17024/09, p. 
31 Glej stockholmski program, ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet decembra 2009, dokument Sveta 17024/09, str.
32 The monthly updates of the annual management plan show the percentage of cases opened in certain sectors and geographical areas, follow-up cases with an impact over certain amounts, percentage of cases closed with follow-up, clearance rate (cases opened/ cases closed), percentage of cases closed in a certain time and number of cases per investigator. 
32 Mesečne posodobitve letnega načrta upravljanja kažejo delež preiskav, odprtih v določenih sektorjih in geografskih področjih, primere nadaljnjega ukrepanja z učinkom nad določenimi zneski, delež zaključenih primerov z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem, stopnjo reševanja (odprti primeri/zaprti primeri), delež zaključenih primerov v določenem času in število primerov na preiskovalca.
33 Monthlymanagementreports show results for the current year to date and four previous years in terms of prison sentences and amounts recovered and also show the duration of assessments, investigations and follow-up. 26 Special Report No 2/2011 — Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office 
33 Mesečna poročila o upravljanju vsebujejo rezultate tekočega leta do datuma poročila in zadnjih štirih let z vidika zapornih kazni in izterjanih zneskov ter dolžino priprave ocen, preiskav in nadaljnjega ukrepanja. 26 Posebno poročilo št. 2/2011 – Nadaljnje ukrepanje po Posebnem poročilu št.
27 REPORTS ON PERFORMANCE DO NOT FULLY EXPLOIT THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE 49. 
27 V POROČILIH O USPEŠNOSTI NISO UPORABLJENE VSE RAZPOLOŽLJIVE INFORMACIJE 49.
The Court made a recommendation that reports on OLAF’s performance should be based on relevant and reliable data. 
Sodišče je priporočilo, naj poročila o uspešnosti OLAF temeljijo na relevantnih in zanesljivih podatkih.
They should enable comparisons over time and include indicators based on real results (recommendation 11). 
Omogočiti bi morala časovne primerjave ter zajemati kazalnike, ki bi temeljili na dejanskih rezultatih (priporočilo 11).
OLAF produces the following reports and follow-up documents on performance: annual management plan monthly update, monthly management reports, annual activity report, annual operational report, and ad hoc reports (such as the 2008 report concerning on-the-spot checks). 
OLAF pripravlja naslednja poročila in dokumente o spremljanju uspešnosti: mesečno posodobitev letnega načrta upravljanja, mesečna poročila o upravljanju, letno poročilo o dejavnostih, letno operativno poročilo in priložnostna poročila (kot je poročilo o pregledih na kraju samem iz leta 2008).
At the end of an investigation, a final case report is submitted to the Board. 
Ob koncu posamezne preiskave se odboru predloži končno poročilo o primeru.
The Board recommends whether the case should be closed with or without follow-up. 
Odbor priporoči, ali naj se primer zaključi z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem ali brez njega.
Follow-up action includes recovering funds and opening criminal proceed-ings34. 
Nadaljnje ukrepanje vključuje izterjavo sredstev in sprožitev kazenskih postop-kov34.
The responsibility for follow-up action does not lie with OLAF, but rather with Commission DGs and national authorities. 
Za nadaljnje ukrepanje ni odgovoren OLAF, ampak generalni direktorati Komisije in nacionalni organi.
OLAF’s role is to optimise conditions for follow-up and to verify whether action has been taken. 
Naloga OLAF je optimizirati pogoje za nadaljnje ukrepanje in preveriti, ali so bili sprejeti ukrepi.
Table 5 shows how information is reported in different documents which are produced at different times (monthly, annually or ad hoc) and for different readers (internal or external). 
V tabeli 5 je prikazano, kako se o informacijah poroča v različnih dokumentih, ki se pripravijo v različnem času (meseč-no, letno ali priložnostno) in za različne bralce (notranje ali zunanje).
34 TheOLAFManualidentifies four kinds of follow-up: administrative, financial, judicial and disciplinary. Special Report No 2/2011 — Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office 
34 VpriročnikuUradaso navedene štiri vrste nadaljnjega ukrepanja: upravno, finančno, sodno in disciplinsko. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2011 – Nadaljnje ukrepanje po Posebnem poročilu št.
It is difficult to form an overview of OLAF’s performance. 
Težko si je ustvariti pregled nad uspešnostjo OLAF.
The information provided is to be found in different documents, which are prepared for different purposes and addressed to different audiences. 
Zagotovljene informacije so navedene v različnih dokumentih, pripravljenih za različne namene in namenjenih različnim naslovnikom.
The Annual Activity Report does not enable the reader to make comparisons of OLAF’s performance over time because there is no summary of key statistics for previous years. 
Letno poročilo o dejavnostih bralcu ne omogoča, da bi primerjal uspešnost OLAF v času, ker ni povzetka ključnih statističnih podatkov za prejšnja leta.
The Annual Operational Report provides comparisons with previous years for a number of indicators relating to activity (information received, initial evaluations carried out, opening decisions and average duration of cases), potential results (% of cases closed with follow-up) and real results (funds actually recovered). 
Letno operativno poročilo vsebuje primerjave s prejšnjimi leti za številne kazalnike, ki se nanašajo na dejavnost (prejete informacije, izvedene ocene začetnih informacij, sklepi o odprtju preiskav in povprečno trajanje primerov), potencialne rezultate (% zaključenih primerov z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem) in dejanske rezultate (dejansko izterjana sredstva).