natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
12,00 10,00 8,00 6,00 4,00 2,00 0,00 Start-ups created per 100 000 euros of operational costs 10,35 2,24 4,89 1,75 3,11 5,31 9,60 1,73 5,27 1,35 3,35 4,09 Audited incubators Benchmarked incubators Business plans Jobs Start-ups Jobs created by staff employed by the incubators Source: ECA benchmarking data for 2011. Business plans Chart 2 
12,00 10,00 8,00 6,00 4,00 2,00 0,00 10,35 2,24 4,89 1,75 3,11 5,31 9,60 1,73 5,27 1,35 3,35 4,09 Revidirani inkubatorji Referenčni inkubatorji Poslovni načrti Zagonska podjetja Delovna mesta Poslovni načrti Zagonska podjetja Delovna mesta na 100 000 EUR operativnih stroškov na zaposlenega v inkubatorju Vir: Referenčni podatki Sodišča za leto 2011. Diagram 2
Observations 16 28 Most of the audited ERDF incubators had commenced operations relatively recently, and this lack of experience undoubtedly hampered their effi‐ ciency. 
Opažanja 16 28 Večina revidiranih inkubatorjev je začela delovati šele pred razmeroma kratkim časom; to pomanjkanje izku‐ šenj je nedvomno vplivalo na njihovo učinkovitost.
However, the magnitude of the difference between the two groups of incubators demonstrates the rela‐ tive underperformance of the ERDF co‐financed incubators audited by the Court. 
Vendar pa velika razlika med obema skupinama inkubatorjev kaže na relativno slabo smotrnost poslovanja inkubatorjev, sofinancira‐ nih iz ESRR, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče.
A discussion of the various pos‐ sible reasons for this appears below, following the structure of the three audit questions asked in paragraph 10. 
V nadaljevanju so obravnavani različni možni vzroki za to, in sicer v obliki, ki sledi trem revizijskim vprašanjem iz odstavka 10.
Audited ERDF incubators had not made sufficient use of good practices 29 A business incubator is a complex system whose success depends on external factors such as the macro‐ economic situation, the legal system in which the incubator operates and the entrepreneurial culture in the coun‐ try in which the incubator is located. 
Revidirani inkubatorji, sofinancirani iz ESRR, niso dovolj uporabljali dobrih praks 29 Podjetniški inkubator je kompleksen sistem, katerega uspeh je odvisen od zunanjih dejavnikov, kot so makroeko‐ nomski položaj, pravni sistem, v kate‐ rem inkubator deluje, in podjetniška kultura v državi, v kateri se inkubator nahaja.
However, internal practices also affect an incubator’s success. 
Vendar pa na uspeh inkubator‐ ja vplivajo tudi notranje prakse.
30 Recognising this, the Court examined the quality and relevance of the prac‐ tices and procedures of the audited incubators in four areas: (a) their internal business planning; (b) the relevance of the services pro‐ vided to their clients; (c) the systems they used for monitor‐ ing clients; (d) and their business models. 
30 Ob upoštevanju navedenega je Sodi‐ šče proučilo kakovost in primernost praks in postopkov revidiranih inkuba‐ torjev na naslednjih štirih področjih: (a) notranje poslovno načrtovanje; (b) ustreznost storitev, ki jih zagota‐ vljajo svojim uporabnikom; (c) sistemi, ki jih uporabljajo za spre‐ mljanje uporabnikov, in (d) poslovni modeli.
When business incubators were being established, too little attention had been paid to the effectiveness of their business support functions 31 The Court considers that a business incubator’s mission and objectives should be clearly defined from the very beginning. 
Pri ustanavljanju podjetniških inkubatorjev je bilo premalo pozornosti namenjeno uspešnosti njihovih podpornih dejavnosti za podjetja 31 Sodišče meni, da bi morali biti misija in cilji podjetniškega inkubatorja že od začetka jasno opredeljeni.
Its future operations should be precisely outlined in a busi‐ ness plan. 
Njegove prihodnje dejavnosti bi morale biti natančno opisane v poslovnem načrtu.
This plan should include information about the incubator’s key business support activities, as well as details of the human and material resources needed for the incubator to successfully achieve its incubation goals. 
Ta načrt bi moral vključevati informa‐ cije o ključnih podpornih dejavnostih za podjetja, ki jih bo inkubator zago‐ tavljal, ter podrobnosti o človeških in materialnih virih, ki so potrebni, da inkubator doseže svoje cilje inkubira‐ nja.
It should also include details of networking arrangements. 
Vsebovati bi moral tudi podrobne informacije o ureditvah za mreženje.
32 Although 22 out of 27 audited incuba‐ tors had prepared a business plan in line with the formal obligations aris‐ ing from legislation governing ERDF support12, only half of them included details of their activity and result‐ oriented goals. 
32 Čeprav je 22 inkubatorjev od 27 pripra‐ vilo poslovne načrte skladno s formal‐ nimi obveznostmi iz zakonodaje, ki ureja podporo iz ESRR,12 je le polovica vanje vključila podrobnosti o svojih dejavnostih in v rezultate usmerjenih ciljih.
12 In the five other cases there was no legal obligation to develop a business plan. 
12 V preostalih petih primerih ni bilo pravne obveznosti za razvoj poslovnega načrta.
Observations 17 33 An analysis of incubators’ business planning documents revealed weak‐ nesses affecting factors which are essential for the sound operation of a business incubator. 
Opažanja 17 33 Analiza dokumentov, ki jih imajo inkubatorji o poslovnem načrtova‐ nju, je razkrila slabosti, ki vplivajo na dejavnike, bistvene za dobro delovanje podjetniškega inkubatorja.
Most commonly, descriptions of incubation pro‐ grammes were missing; the resources to be assigned to incubation processes (e.g. qualified staff) had not been specified; or items of information on the cost of incubation activities were incomplete or missing. 
Najpogo‐ steje opisa programov inkubiranja ni bilo, viri, ki naj bi se zagotovili v pro‐ cesu inkubiranja (npr. usposobljeno osebje), niso bili določeni ali pa so bile informacije o stroških dejavnosti inku‐ batorja nepopolne ali jih ni bilo.
Without this essential information, it is not possible to make a reliable assessment of the future economic sustainability of any incubator. 
Brez teh bistvenih informacij pa prihodnje ekonomske trajnosti inkubatorja ni mogoče zanesljivo oceniti.
34 Most of the numerous objectives included in the planning documents concerned the facilities of incuba‐ tors themselves, rather than focusing on the activities which the incubator would actually carry out. 
34 Večina številnih ciljev iz dokumentov o načrtovanju se je nanašala na same objekte inkubatorjev in ni bila osre‐ dotočena na dejavnosti, ki naj bi jih inkubator dejansko izvajal.
Insufficient attention was thus paid to the impor‐ tance and the results of incubation processes. 
Pomenu in rezultatom procesa inkubiranja je bilo namenjene premalo pozornosti.
This bias towards phys‐ ical objectives (e.g. construction and equipment) gave undue prominence to the objectives of the construction phase (phase I) instead of concentrat‐ ing on achieving the fundamental objectives of incubation activity (phase II). 
To nagibanje k fizičnim ciljem (npr. iz‐ gradnja in oprema) posledično pomeni neustrezno poudarjanje ciljev v fazi iz‐ gradnje (fazi I) namesto osredotočenja na dosego temeljnih ciljev dejavnosti inkubatorja (faza II).
Incubation services were only loosely linked to clients’ needs 35 The Court considers that the core ac‐ tivity of any business incubator is the provision of business support services to its clients. 
Storitve inkubatorja so bile le ohlapno povezane s potrebami uporabnikov 35 Sodišče meni, da je osnovna dejavnost podjetniškega inkubatorja zagotavlja‐ nje podpornih storitev za uporabnike.
A wide range of services13 can be offered to entrepreneurs; these include the rental of physical space; mentoring; training; consulting in various areas; networking; access to financing; and many other things. 
Podjetnikom se lahko nudi vrsta sto‐ ritev13; te vključujejo najem fizičnega prostora, mentorstvo, izobraževanje, posvetovanje na različnih področjih, mreženje, dostop do financiranja in še marsikaj.
However, if results are to be delivered effectively, incubation support cannot be offered in the form of a simple list of available services. 
A če naj se rezultati zago‐ tovijo učinkovito, potem za podporo inkubatorja ne zadostuje le preprost seznam storitev, ki so na voljo.
The most effec‐ tive incubators apply an individual approach, providing a tailor‐made incubation programme in combination with other entrepreneurial support initiatives (such as lectures given by invited speakers) aimed at preparing newly created SMEs to operate on the free market. 
Naj‐ uspešnejši inkubatorji uporabljajo indi‐ vidualni pristop, ki nudi posameznemu podjetju prilagojen program inkubira‐ nja skupaj z drugimi pobudami za pod‐ poro podjetnikom (kot so predavanja gostujočih govorcev), katerih namen je pripraviti zagonska MSP za delovanje na prostem trgu.
Services offered 36 In the audited incubators, the support provided to hosted companies gener‐ ally14 took the form of subsidised office space (offered by 94 % of incubators). 
Nudene storitve 36 V revidiranih inkubatorjih je bila pod‐ pora, nudena gostujočim podjetjem, običajno14 v obliki subvencionirane‐ ga pisarniškega prostora (nudilo jo je 94 % inkubatorjev).
In addition to this, ‘soft services’ were also provided free of charge, or for a low fee. 
Poleg tega so bile brezplačno ali po nizkih cenah za‐ gotovljene tudi „mehke storitve“.
The most common were coaching, training courses and support in the areas of law, marketing, account‐ ing and intellectual property rights. 
To so bili najpogosteje inštruiranje in tečaji usposabljanja ter podpora na področju prava, trženja, računovodstva in pravic intelektualne lastnine.
13 The ‘State of the business incubation industry’ report produced by the United States National Business Incubation Association in 2006 identifies 33 distinct services which can be offered to client companies by business incubators. 
13 V poročilu State of the Business Incubation Industry (Stanje v panogi podjetniških inkubatorjev), ki ga je leta 2006 pripravilo Ameriško združenje podjetniških inkubatorjev, je opredeljenih 33 storitev, ki jih lahko podjetniški inkubatorji nudijo podjetjem uporabnikom.
14 Discounted rental costs were not usually offered in the United Kingdom. 
14 V Združenem kraljestvu se znižani najemni stroški običajno niso uporabljali.
Observations 18 37 Chart 3 shows the range of services being offered by ERDF incubators audited by the Court in comparison with the range of relevant services offered by incubators in the bench‐ marked EC‐BIC population. 
Opažanja 18 37 V diagramu 3 je prikazan razpon stori‐ tev, ki jih nudijo inkubatorji, sofinanci‐ rani iz ESRR, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, v primerjavi z razponom zadevnih sto‐ ritev, ki jih nudijo referenčni inkubator‐ ji z oznako EC‐BIC.
In par‐ ticular, only 53 % of incubators were able to provide advice about financial planning and financing. 
Zlasti je opaziti, da je lahko le 53 % inkubatorjev zagota‐ vljalo storitve svetovanja o finančnem načrtovanju in financiranju.
This is a cause for concern: insufficient access to finance is recognised as a key barrier to the development of SMEs15, and the lack of financial advice provided by incubators did not help to reduce this problem. 
To je vzrok za zaskrbljenost, saj je nezadosten do‐ stop do financiranja priznan kot ključ‐ na ovira za razvoj MSP15, to, da inku‐ batorji niso zagotavljali dovolj storitev svetovanja na področju financiranja, pa ni pripomoglo k zmanjšanju obsega tega problema.
This hampered clients’ and potential clients’ overall perception of how useful the support offered by incubators to hosted companies was. 
To je oviralo splošno dojemanje obstoječih in potencialnih uporabnikov o koristnosti podpore, ki jo inkubatorji zagotavljajo gostujočim podjetjem.
Type and frequency of principal services offered by audited ERDF incubators 15 ‘The SME financing gap, Volume I: Theory And Evidence’, Organisation For Economic Cooperation and Development (http:// ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ newsroom/cf/_getdocument. cfm?doc_id=624). 
Vrste in pogostost glavnih storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo revidirani inkubatorji, sofinancirani iz ESRR 15 The SME Financing Gap, Volume I, Theory And Evidence (Finančne vrzeli MSP, zvezek I, teorija in dokazi), Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (http:// ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ newsroom/cf/_getdocument. cfm?doc_id=624).
Audited ERDF incubators offer a more limited range of services. 
Revidirani inkubatorji, sofinancirani iz ESRR, zagotavljajo bolj omejen obseg storitev.
Assessment of training needs Rental of incubation space 94 % Fundraising support 67 % 69 % 41 % 51 % Delivery of training 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Start-up services 90 % Identification of target clients Risk analysis support Entrepreneurial skills assessment support 71 % 80 % Audited incubators Benchmarked incubators Source: ECA benchmarking data for 2011. 
Ocena potreb po usposabljanju Oddaja prostorov inkubatorja 94 % Podpora pri zbiranju sredstev 67 % 69 % 41 % 51 % Podpora pri analizi tveganja Podpora pri oceni podjetniških veščin Izvedba usposabljanja 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Storitve za zagonska podjetja Opredelitev ciljnih uporabnikov 71 % 80 % Revidirani inkubatorji Referenčni inkubatorji 90 % Podpora pri finančnem načrtovanju Podpora pri poslovnem načrtovanju Podpora pri opredelitvi poslovnega modela Vir: Referenčni podatki Sodišča za leto 2011.
Financial planning support Business planning support Business modelling support 53 % 76 % 78 % Chart 3 
53 % 76 % 78 % Diagram 3
Observations 19 Incubation programmes 38 During the audit, the Court observed that the relatively limited range of services offered by the audited incuba‐ tors was a direct consequence of the approach they took to incubation. 
Opažanja 19 Programi inkubiranja 38 Sodišče je med revizijo ugotovilo, da je razmeroma majhen obseg storitev, ki jih nudijo revidirani inkubatorji, ne‐ posredna posledica njihovega pristopa do inkubiranja.
In general, ERDF co‐financed incubators were not directly involved in the busi‐ ness development of their clients and were not actively working with hosted companies to identify and set business objectives for them. 
Na splošno inkubatorji, sofinancirani iz ESRR, niso bili neposre‐ dno vključeni v poslovni razvoj svojih uporabnikov in niso aktivno sodelovali z gostujočimi podjetji pri opredelitvi in določitvi njihovih ciljev.
The incubators did not require hosted companies to collaborate closely with them in this way; for their own part, hosted com‐ panies often saw no benefit in shar‐ ing sensitive business data, and were therefore reluctant to do so. 
Inkubatorji od gostujočih podjetij niso zahtevali tesnega sodelovanja na tem podro‐ čju, gostujoča podjetja pa so pogosto menila, da jim izmenjava občutljivih poslovnih podatkov ne prinaša nobe‐ nih koristi, zato so pri tem omahovala.
39 Structured comprehensive incuba‐ tion programmes involving intensive cooperation between incubators and their clients were scarce. 
39 Strukturiranih celovitih programov in‐ kubiranja, ki vključujejo intenzivno so‐ delovanje med inkubatorji in njihovimi uporabniki, je bilo zelo malo.
Only 4 out of 27 audited incubators systematically drew up a comprehensive incubation programme together with each indi‐ vidual client, establishing specific per‐ formance and development objectives. 
Samo 4 revidirani inkubatorji od 27 so skupaj z vsakim posameznim uporabnikom sistematično pripravili celovit pro‐ gram inkubiranja ter v njem opredelili posebne cilje v zvezi s smotrnostjo poslovanja in razvojem.
Only 6 out of 27 audited incubators were subject to quality audits which aimed to improve the overall quality of incubation services. 
Le v 6 revidira‐ nih inkubatorjih od 27 so bile opravlje‐ ne revizije kakovosti, katerih namen je bil izboljšati splošno kakovost storitev inkubatorja.
40 This limited level of cooperation led to a sense of ‘isolation’ from the incuba‐ tor, and also had a negative effect on the sense of community between tenants. 
40 Pomanjkljiva stopnja sodelovanja je privedla do občutka „odtujenosti“ od inkubatorja, imela pa je tudi negati‐ ven učinek na občutek skupnosti med najemniki.
This did not facilitate synergy between tenants. 
To ni olajšalo sinergije med najemniki.
Staff skills 41 The absence of a culture of intensive cooperation between incubators and clients meant that there was no incen‐ tive for incubator staff to possess or to acquire specific skills and expertise which would allow them to assist hosted companies more effectively. 
Veščine osebja 41 Ker ni bilo kulture intenzivnega sode‐ lovanja med inkubatorji in uporabniki, tudi ni bilo pobud, da bi zaposleni v in‐ kubatorjih imeli ali pridobili posebne veščine in strokovno znanje, s katerimi bi lahko uspešneje podpirali gostujoča podjetja.
The resulting lack of skills meant that incubator staff were unable to take steps to engage more effectively with hosted companies, creating a vicious circle. 
Zaradi posledičnega pomanj‐ kanja veščin osebje inkubatorjev ni moglo sprejeti ukrepov za uspešnejše sodelovanje z gostujočimi podjetji, s čimer se je ustvaril začaran krog.
The range of skills and expertise possessed by incubator staff was less extensive in the audited incubators compared to the benchmarked incuba‐ tors, as Chart 4 shows. 
Obseg veščin in strokovnega znanja osebja v revidiranih inkubatorjih je bil manjši kot v referenčnih inkubatorjih, kot je prikazano v diagramu 4.
42 In particular, relatively few members of staff who were engaged directly in business incubation activities pos‐ sessed skills which allowed them to offer more specialised assistance to companies in areas such as specific sector‐related expertise (39 %) or ac‐ cessing financing possibilities (43 %). 
42 Zlasti je imelo razmeroma malo zapo‐ slenih, ki so neposredno sodelovali pri dejavnostih podjetniških inkubatorjev, veščine, ki bi jim omogočale zagota‐ vljanje bolj specializirane pomoči pod‐ jetjem na področjih, kot je strokovno znanje o specifičnem sektorju (39 %), ali dostop do možnosti financiranja (43 %).
Observations 20 Comparison of main available staff skills and expertise The range of skills and expertise possessed by incubator staff was less extensive in the audited incubators. 
Opažanja 20 Primerjava glavnih veščin in strokovnega znanja osebja Obseg veščin in strokovnega znanja osebja inkubatorjev je bil v revidiranih inkubatorjih manjši.
Specific sector-related expertise Promotion of assisted SMEs 49 % 39 % 55 % 39 % 35 % Audited incubators Benchmarked incubators Other High-tech SME creation & support 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% 22 % 14 % International cooperation Legal advice Access to finance Source: ECA benchmarking data for 2011. 
43 49 % 39 % 55 % 39 % 35 % Pravno svetovanje Dostop do financiranja Revidirani inkubatorji Referenčni inkubatorji Drugo 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% 22 % 14 % Mednarodno sodelovanje Ustanavljanje visokotehnoloških MSP in podpora zanje Druga posledica premajhnega sodelo‐ vanja je bila tudi, da so imeli inkuba‐ torji le omejeno strukturirano znanje o potrebah in dosežkih posameznih gostujočih podjetij.
43 Pre-incubation and virtual incubation 44 Weaknesses in programmes and low levels of engagement were also detected in two other important areas of incubator activity: pre‐incubation support (see paragraph 5a) and virtual incubation (see paragraph 46). 
Predinkubacijska faza in virtualna inkubacija 44 Slabosti v programih in nizka stopnja sodelovanja so bile ugotovljene še na dveh drugih pomembnih področjih dejavnosti inkubatorjev: na področju podpore v predinkubacijski fazi (glej odstavek 5a) in virtualne inkubacije (glej odstavek 46).
Both services are provided to prospective clients and to clients who are not necessarily physically located on the incubator’s premises. 
Obe vrsti storitev se zagotavljata prihodnjim uporabnikom in tistim, ki niso nujno fizično prisotni v prostorih inkubatorja.
Advanced use of ICT for SME development Human resource development 43 % 43 % Chart 4 
Napredna uporaba IKT za razvoj MSP 43 % 43 % Razvoj človeških virov Diagram 4
Observations 21 45 Providing intensive pre‐incubation support to potential entrepreneurs is important. 
Opažanja 21 45 Zagotavljanje intenzivne podpore potencialnim podjetnikom v predin‐ kubacijski fazi je pomembno.
Firstly, it allows an incubator to develop a pool of pro‐ spective clients irrespective of their geographical origin. 
Prvič, inkubatorju omogoča razvoj skupine morebitnih uporabnikov ne glede na njihov geografski položaj.
It also enhances the incubator’s engagement with its local community. However, it requires a significant commitment of time by incubator staff. In all, 14 out of 27 au‐ dited incubators failed to offer it. 
Spodbuja tudi sodelovanje inkubatorja z lokalno skupnostjo, vendar pa tudi pomeni, da osebje inkubatorja temu nameni precej časa. Skupno 14 revidiranih in‐ kubatorjev od 27 te podpore ni nudilo.
The absence of this service was one of the reasons behind the low number of enquiries received by incubators, as the Table shows. 
Nezagotavljanje te storitve je bil eden od razlogov za majhno število poiz‐ vedb, ki so jih prejeli inkubatorji, kar je prikazano v tabeli.
46 Virtual incubation refers to the provi‐ sion of incubation programmes to clients who are not based on the incu‐ bator’s premises. 
46 Virtualna inkubacija se nanaša na zagotavljanje programov inkubiranja uporabnikom, ki niso prisotni v prosto‐ rih inkubatorja.
It is a service which increases the effectiveness of incuba‐ tors (see paragraph 26). 
Ta storitev povečuje uspešnost inkubatorjev (glej odsta‐ vek 26).
Interest in receiving this type of business support largely depends on the quality and ef‐ fectiveness of incubation programmes. 
Zanimanje za to vrsto podpore podjetjem je v veliki meri odvisno od kakovosti in uspešnosti programov inkubiranja.
Weak incubation programmes (see paragraphs 38 and 39) and limitations in the range of services offered were two main reasons for the fact that only 11 out of 27 audited incubators pro‐ vided virtual incubation to externally located clients. 
Šibki programi inkubiranja (glej odstavka 38 in 39) in omejitve pri obsegu nudenih storitev sta bila glavna razloga, da je le 11 revidiranih inkubatorjev od 27 zagotavljalo virtu‐ alno inkubacijo uporabnikom, ki so se nahajali zunaj prostorov inkubatorja.
Networking and embedded incubators 47 The audited incubators had a good understanding of the need for net‐ working and of the benefits which it brought. 
Mreženje in vključeni inkubatorji 47 Pri revidiranih inkubatorjih je bilo opaziti dobro razumevanje potrebe po mreženju in koristi, ki jih to prinaša.
In all, 19 out of 27 of them had attempted to build up a network of connected stakeholders. 
Od 27 jih je 19 poskušalo ustvariti mre‐ žo povezanih deležnikov.
Further‐ more, almost all audited incubators had links with a recognised local part‐ ner, or were embedded within one. 
Poleg tega so bili skoraj vsi revidirani inkubatorji po‐ vezani s priznanimi lokalnimi partnerji ali pa so bili vanje vključeni.
These partners included universities, business support organisations and public authorities. 
Ti partner‐ ji so vključevali univerze, organizacije za podporo podjetjem in javne organe.
However, few in‐ cubators had successfully established a network which engaged all types of relevant stakeholders (e.g. universities, industry leaders and their own former client companies in the post‐incuba‐ tion stage). 
Vendar pa so redki inkubatorji uspešno vzpostavili mrežo, ki bi vključevala vse vrste zadevnih deležnikov (npr. univer‐ ze, vodilne ljudi v panogah in njihova nekdanja podjetja uporabnike v poinkubacijski fazi).
48 Incubators should play an important role in each region’s business support infrastructure. However, only 14 out of 27 incubators had been consulted at any point in the past during the prep‐ aration of regional innovation strat‐ egies. 
48 Inkubatorji bi morali imeti v vsaki regiji pomembno vlogo v infrastrukturi za podporo podjetjem, vendar je bilo na kateri koli točki priprave regionalnih inovacijskih strategij v preteklosti opravljeno posvetovanje le s 14 inku‐ batorji od 27.