natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Overall, this framework fits into the wider context of the EU health strategy. 
V celoti gledano je ta okvir usklajen s širšim okvirom zdravstvene strategije EU.
14 The audit work addressed the following main audit question: Is the EU framework for protecting citizens from serious cross-border threats to health adequately implemented? 
14 Pri reviziji je bilo obravnavano naslednje glavno revizijsko vprašanje: Ali se okvir EU za varovanje državljanov pred resnimi čezmejnimi nevarnostmi za zdravje ustrezno izvaja?
Under this main question we examined: (i) whether the innovations introduced by the decision are effectively implemented; (ii) whether the existing systems for early warning and response and epidemiological surveillance are adequately managed and implemented; (iii) whether the EU health programmes are making effective contributions to protecting citizens from threats to health; and (iv) whether the Commission’s internal coordination in terms of health security funding and public health crisis management is adequate. 
V okviru tega glavnega vprašanja je Sodišče preverilo: (i) ali se novosti, ki so bile uvedene s sklepom, učinkovito izvajajo; (ii) ali se obstoječi sistemi za zgodnje obveščanje in odzivanje ter epidemiološko spremljanje ustrezno upravljajo in izvajajo; (iii) ali zdravstveni programi EU učinkovito prispevajo k varovanju državljanov pred nevarnostmi za zdravje ter (iv) ali je notranje usklajevanje Komisije glede financiranja zdravstvene varnosti in glede javnozdravstvenega kriznega upravljanja ustrezno.
15 The scope of the audit is closely aligned with the various areas of the decision on serious cross-border threats to health (also see Figure 1 above). 
15 Obseg revizije je tesno usklajen z različnimi področji sklepa o resnih čezmejnih nevarnostih za zdravje (glej tudi sliko 1 zgoraj).
Sub-question 1 covered the innovations introduced in EU legislation by the decision (e.g. coordination of preparedness planning, joint procurement and the strengthened role of the HSC, see paragraphs 7 to 9), and sub-question 2 covered the systems that already existed previously (i.e. for epidemiological surveillance and early warning and response). 
V okviru podvprašanja 1 so bile obravnavane novosti, ki so bile s sklepom uvedene v zakonodajo EU (npr. usklajevanje načrtovanja pripravljenosti, skupno javno naročanje in okrepljena vloga Odbora za zdravstveno varnost; glej odstavke 7 do 9), v okviru podvprašanja 2 pa sistemi, ki so obstajali že prej (tj. sistemi za epidemiološko spremljanje ter zgodnje obveščanje in odzivanje).
16 The audit scope also included an assessment of the management of EU resources made available to contribute to protecting citizens from health threats. 
16 V obseg revizije je bila vključena tudi ocena upravljanja sredstev EU, dodeljenih z namenom prispevanja k varovanju državljanov pred nevarnostmi za zdravje.
Under sub-question 3 we assessed relevant actions and projects by DG Health and Food Safety and Chafea for the 2008-2013 and, to a certain extent, 2014-2020 programming periods. 
V okviru podvprašanja 3 je Sodišče presojalo ustrezne ukrepe in projekte GD za zdravje in varnost hrane ter agencije Chafea za programsko obdobje 2008–2013 in do neke mere za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.
Audit scope and approach 17 17 Under sub-question 4 we assessed general performance and coordination activities, notably at the level of DG Health and Food Safety’s Crisis Management and Preparedness in Health Unit and ECDC’s relevant operational units. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 17 17 V okviru podvprašanja 4 je Sodišče presojalo splošno učinkovitost in usklajevalne dejavnosti, predvsem na ravni kriznega upravljanja GD za zdravje in varnost hrane ter pripravljenosti v enoti za zdravje in ustreznih operativnih enotah centra ECDC.
We also looked into DG Health and Food Safety’s coordination with other Commission services, especially in relation to research programmes with health security objectives, as well as to crisis management structures. 
Preučilo je tudi usklajevanje GD za zdravje in varnost hrane z drugimi službami Komisije, zlasti v zvezi z raziskovalnimi programi, ki vključujejo cilje na področju zdravstvene varnosti, in strukturami za krizno upravljanje.
18 The Court does not have the mandate to examine the implementation of the WHO IHR by the Member States or the general implementation of preparedness plans at national level. This was therefore not part of the audit scope. 
18 Sodišče ni pooblaščeno za preverjanje, kako države članice izvajajo Mednarodni zdravstveni pravilnik Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije ali kako se načrti pripravljenosti na splošno izvajajo na nacionalni ravni, zato to ni bilo vključeno v obseg revizije.
However, certain IHR concepts were considered during the audit. 
Kljub temu so bili med revizijo obravnavani nekateri koncepti Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika.
As regards our audit work on the coordination of crisis management structures the audit scope did not include a full assessment of their functioning across multiple directorates-general or as part of the EU response to the Ebola outbreak27. 
Kar zadeva revizijsko delo Sodišča glede usklajevanja struktur za krizno upravljanje, v obseg revizije ni bila vključena celovita presoja njihovega delovanja v več generalnih direktoratih ali v okviru odziva EU na izbruh ebole27.
19 Questions 1 to 4 were addressed at the level of the Commission (i.e. DG Health and Food Safety, and for questions 3 and 4 information visits were also made to DG Migration and Home Affairs, DG Research and Innovation, the Research Executive Agency (REA) and the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA)) and ECDC, and discussed during information visits to four Member States28. 
19 Vprašanja 1 do 4 so bila obravnavana na ravni Komisije (tj. GD za zdravje in varnost hrane, glede vprašanj 3 in 4 pa so bili opravljeni tudi informativni obiski pri GD za migracije in notranje zadeve, GD za raziskave in inovacije, Izvajalski agenciji za raziskave (REA) in Izvajalski agenciji Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta (ERCEA)) in ECDC ter v okviru informativnih obiskov v štirih državah članicah28.
In addition to interviews during the site visits, we conducted an information visit to WHO Europe, performed a desk review of 20 health programme ac-tions29 (see Annex III for an overview of these) and the objectives of ten FP7 projects (see Annex III) and consulted Commission progress and implementation reports, as well as documents relating to the work of the HSC. 
Sodišče je poleg pogovorov med obiski na kraju samem opravilo tudi informativni obisk pri SZO za Evropo, izvedlo dokumentacijski pregled 20 ukrepov v okviru zdravstvenega programa29 (glej Prilogo III) ter ustrezne informacije poiskalo v poročilih Komisije o napredku in izvajanju ter dokumentih v zvezi z delom Odbora za zdravstveno varnost.
20 The materiality and potential impact relevant to the implementation and management of the areas included in the audit scope should mainly be judged by the potential costs and consequences of not dealing with cross-border public health threats in the most effective way. 
20 Pomembnost in potencialni vpliv, povezana z izvajanjem in upravljanjem področij, vključenih v obseg revizije, bi bilo treba presojati predvsem z vidika potencialnih stroškov in posledic, ki bi nastali, če se s čezmejnimi nevarnostmi za javno zdravje ne bi spopadli na najuspešnejši način.
Emergency situations typically require the immediate availability of significant (financial) resources for response actions, and all the more so if the early response is slower or less effective than required. 
Izredne razmere običajno zahtevajo, da so za ukrepe odzivanja takoj na voljo precejšnja (finančna) sredstva, kar velja še toliko bolj, če je zgodnje odzivanje počasnejše ali manj uspešno, kot je potrebno.
In addition, damaging impacts are not restricted to human health, but also potentially extend to many sectors of the wider economy, as described in paragraphs 1 and 2. 
Poleg tega škodljivi učinki niso omejeni le na zdravje ljudi, temveč lahko zajamejo tudi številne sektorje širšega gospodarstva, kot je opisano v odstavkih 1 in 2.
Given the unpredictable nature and scale of future public health emergencies it is not possible to quantify such damages and impacts up front. 
Zaradi nepredvidljive narave in obsega prihodnjih izrednih razmer na področju javnega zdravja take škode in učinkov ni mogoče vnaprej količinsko opredeliti.
27 In this context we also refer to another performance audit by the Court on Commission crisis management in the external domain, including a case study of the Ebola crisis. 
27 V zvezi s tem se sklicujemo tudi na eno izmed revizij smotrnosti kriznega upravljanja Komisije v okviru zunanjega delovanja, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, vključno s študijo primera v zvezi s krizo zaradi izbruha ebole.
28 Information visits were made to Estonia, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. 
28 Informativni obiski so bili opravljeni v Estoniji, Italiji, na Nizozemskem in v Združenem kraljestvu.
We selected these countries based on geographical spread and risk factors such as travel, trade and external borders. 
Te države so bile izbrane na podlagi geografske porazdelitve in dejavnikov tveganja, kot so potovanja, trgovina in zunanje meje.
29 Representing approximately 56 % (i.e. 18 million euro) of the health threats funding under the second health programme. 
29 Ti predstavljajo približno 56 % (tj. 18 milijonov EUR) sredstev v okviru drugega zdravstvenega programa, namenjenih projektom in ukrepom v zvezi z nevarnostmi za zdravje.
We also visited the main coordinators of seven projects on the spot. 
Sodišče je na kraju samem obiskalo tudi glavne koordinatorje sedmih projektov.
Audit observations 18 The decision on serious cross-border threats to health introduced certain innovations for EU health security, but their implementation and development were hampered by delays, and strategic and operational challenges remain 21 We examined whether the innovations introduced by the decision on serious cross-border threats to health, as described in paragraphs 7 to 9 and Figure 1, were effectively implemented. 
Revizijska opažanja 18 S sklepom o resnih čezmejnih nevarnostih za zdravje so bile uvedene nekatere novosti na področju zdravstvene varnosti v EU, toda njihovo izvajanje in razvoj so ovirale zamude, tako da še vedno obstajajo strateški in operativni izzivi 21 Sodišče je proučilo, ali so bile novosti, uvedene s sklepom o resnih čezmejnih nevarnostih za zdravje, kot je opisano v odstavkih 7 do 9 in na sliki 1, učinkovito izvedene.
Overall we found that the implementation and development of these innovations were hampered by delays, and that strategic and operational challenges remain. 
Na splošno je ugotovilo, da so izvajanje in razvoj teh novosti ovirale zamude ter da še vedno obstajajo strateški in operativni izzivi.
In the following paragraphs we report on insufficiently clear-cut results from the preparedness planning consultation and coordination and the weak measurement of performance for these activities. 
V naslednjih odstavkih Sodišče poroča o premalo jasnih rezultatih posvetovanja o načrtovanju pripravljenosti ter njegovem usklajevanju, pa tudi o slabem merjenju uspešnosti teh dejavnosti.
We also report on ECDC’s role in generic preparedness, which is not sufficiently formalised, the slow progress in joint procurement of medical countermeasures and the absence of an EU mechanism to address urgent needs for medical countermeasures within the framework of the decision on serious cross-border threats to health. 
Poleg tega poroča o vlogi ECDC pri splošni pripravljenosti, ki ni zadostno formalizirana, počasnem napredku pri skupnem javnem naročanju zdravstvenih protiukrepov ter odsotnosti mehanizma EU za obravnavanje nujnih potreb po zdravstvenih protiukrepih v okviru sklepa o resnih čezmejnih nevarnostih za zdravje.
Finally, we report on operational and strategic challenges for the Health Security Committee and difficulties in applying the coordination of response rules. 
Nazadnje Sodišče poroča še o operativnih in strateški izzivih za Odbor za zdravstveno varnost ter težavah pri uporabi pravil glede usklajevanja odzivanja.
Insufficient clear-cut results from the preparedness planning consultation and coordination 22 Member States and the Commission should consult each other within the HSC with a view to coordinating their efforts to develop, strengthen and maintain their capacities for the monitoring, early warning and assessment of, and response to, serious cross-border threats to health30. 
Premalo jasnih rezultatov posvetovanja o načrtovanju pripravljenosti ter njegovem usklajevanju 22 Države članice in Komisija bi se morale v okviru Odbora za zdravstveno varnost medsebojno posvetovati, da bi uskladile svoja prizadevanja za razvoj, krepitev in ohranjanje zmogljivosti za spremljanje resnih čezmejnih nevarnosti za zdravje, zgodnje obveščanje o njih, njihovo ocenjevanje in odzivanje nanje30.
That consultation should be aimed at sharing best practices and experience in preparedness and response planning, promoting the interoperability of national preparedness planning and addressing the need for different sectors (e.g. health, civil protection, transport, border control) to work together in preparedness and response planning at Union level. 
Posvetovanje bi moralo biti namenjeno izmenjavi najboljših praks in izkušenj pri načrtovanju pripravljenosti in odzivanja; spodbujanju interoperabilnosti nacionalnega načrtovanja pripravljenosti; ter obravnavanju potrebe, da različni sektorji (kot so npr. zdravstvo, civilna zaščita, promet in mejni nadzor) sodelujejo na področju načrtovanja pripravljenosti in odzivanja na ravni Unije.
It should also support the implementation of core capacity requirements for surveillance and response as referred to in the IHR (see Annex I). 
Podpirati bi moralo tudi izvajanje zahtev glede osnovnih zmogljivosti za spremljanje in odzivanje, kot je navedeno v Mednarodnem zdravstvenem pravilniku (glej Prilogo I).
23 Member States should submit to the Commission by 7 November 2014, and every 3 years thereafter, an update on the latest situation with regard to their national preparedness and response planning for the main areas described above. 
23 Države članice so morale Komisiji do 7. novembra 2014, nato pa vsaka tri leta, predložiti poročilo o najnovejših razmerah na področju svojega načrtovanja pripravljenosti in odzivanja na nacionalni ravni za glavna področja, navedena zgoraj.
To ensure compatibility and relevance of the information to the objectives, the submission of this information is based on a template adopted by the Commission. 
Da bi zagotovili skladnost teh informacij s cilji in njihovo ustreznost, je Komisija sprejela predlogo, ki se uporablja za poročanje.
30 Article 4 of Decision No 1082/2013/EU. 
30 Člen 4 Sklepa št. 1082/2013/EU.
Audit observations 19 24 The Commission, in consultation with the Member States, adopted the template for providing the preparedness information in July 2014, only 4 months before the deadline for completion of the questionnaire by the Member States, during the Ebola crisis. 
Revizijska opažanja 19 24 Komisija je po posvetovanju z državami članicami obrazce za poročanje informacij o pripravljenosti sprejela julija leta 2014, le štiri mesece pred rokom, do katerega so morale države članice izpolniti vprašalnike, med krizo zaradi izbruha ebole.
Nine Member States submitted their replies on time through an electronic survey. 
Devet držav članic EU je odgovore prek elektronske ankete oddalo pravočasno.
A further 17 Member States submitted their replies late, mostly in 2015, after the Commission had reminded them several times. 
17 držav članic je odgovore oddalo z zamudo, večinoma v letu 2015, potem ko jih je Komisija večkrat opomnila.
The Commission worked with ECDC and WHO Europe to compile a progress report on preparedness and response planning based on the Member State replies, which was put to the HSC in June and November 2015. 
Komisija je v sodelovanju z ECDC in SZO za Evropo na podlagi odgovorov držav članic pripravila poročilo o napredku pri načrtovanju pripravljenosti in odzivanja, ki je bilo junija in novembra leta 2015 predloženo OZV.
Despite the delays in submitting the replies, this initiated the required exchange of information on preparedness and response planning. 
Kljub zamudam pri oddaji odgovorov se je s tem začela potrebna izmenjava informacij o načrtovanju pripravljenosti in odzivanja.
25 However, most of the information included in this report, apart from some geographical maps sourced from WHO reports31, is anonymised and aggregated. 
25 Večina informacij v poročilu, razen nekaterih geografskih zemljevidov, pridobljenih iz poročil SZO31, je anonimiziranih in združenih.
It therefore does not show members of the HSC which country provided which information, suggestions for improvements or best practices, or examples, to allow for efficient and transparent exchanges of views, despite the confidential character of the HSC and the report itself. 
To pomeni, da članom OZV ne kažejo, katera država je posredovala katere informacije, predloge izboljšav ali najboljših praks in primere, ter ne omogočajo učinkovite in pregledne izmenjave mnenj, čeprav sta tako Odbor za zdravstveno varnost kot poročilo zaupne narave.
Neither the decision on serious cross-border threats to health nor the template for the questionnaire require Member States to provide supporting evidence such as implementation or action plans, national manuals or actual preparedness plans. 
Niti sklep o resnih čezmejnih nevarnostih za zdravje niti obrazec vprašalnika ne zahtevata, da države članice predložijo dokazila, kot so načrti izvajanja ali akcijski načrti, nacionalni priročniki ali dejanski načrti pripravljenosti.
26 The legislation does not provide the Commission with the mandate to collect or verify such information, for example during country visits. 
26 Zakonodaja Komisiji ne daje pooblastil za zbiranje ali preverjanje takih informacij, na primer med obiski držav.
The information included in the progress report on relevant aspects of preparedness is solely based on self-assessments by the Member States and does not contain supporting evidence. 
Informacije v poročilu o napredku pri ustreznih vidikih pripravljenosti temeljijo zgolj na samoocenah držav članic in ne vključujejo dokazil.
Although this does not mean that the reported information is inaccurate, the consequence is that strengths and weaknesses identified in the report and presented to the HSC are not based on data that was externally verified or reviewed. 
To sicer ne pomeni, da sporočene informacije niso točne, toda posledično prednosti in slabosti, opredeljene v poročilu in predstavljene OZV, ne temeljijo na neodvisno preverjenih ali pregledanih podatkih.
Such reviewing and increased transparency, while not foreseen by the legislation, are likely to contribute to a higher level of confidence in relation to preparedness for serious cross-border health threats (see Box 3 on weaknesses in self-assessment in relation to IHR implementation), and would allow for better targeting of actions needed to address weaknesses. 
Taki pregledi in večja preglednost, ki jih zakonodaja sicer ne predvideva, lahko prispevajo k višji stopnji zaupanja, ko gre za pripravljenost na resne čezmejne nevarnosti za zdravje (glej okvir 3 o slabostih samoocenjevanja v zvezi z izvajanjem Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika), in bi omogočili boljše usmerjanje potrebnih ukrepov za odpravljanje slabosti.
31 WHO (2014), Summary of State Parties 2013 report on IHR core capacity implementation, Regional Profiles; http://www. who.int/ihr/publications/ WHO_HSE_GCR_2014.10/en/ 
31 SZO (2014);): Summary of State Parties 2013 report on IHR core capacity implementation, Regional Profiles (Povzetek poročil držav partneric o izvajanju osnovnih zmogljivosti iz Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika za leto 2013, regionalni profili); http://www.who.int/ihr/ publications/WHO_HSE_ GCR_2014.10/en/.
Audit observations 20 International developments concerning preparedness: weaknesses in self-assessment of IHR implementation Weaknesses inherent in self-assessments on IHR core capacity implementation have been signalled by WHO and its expert panels. 
Revizijska opažanja 20 Mednarodni razvoj dogodkov v zvezi s pripravljenostjo: slabosti samoocenjevanja v zvezi z izvajanjem Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika Na slabosti, ki so svojstvene za samoocenjevanje izvajanja osnovnih zmogljivosti iz Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika, so opozorile SZO in njene skupine strokovnjakov.
The Ebola Interim Assessment Panel wrote in July 2015 that it considered it to be unacceptable that only voluntary self-assessment is required for the measurement of IHR core capacities. 
V skladu s poročilom komisije za vmesno oceno o eboli, objavljenem julija leta 2015, je nesprejemljivo, da se za merjenje osnovnih zmogljivosti iz Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika zahteva le prostovoljna samoocena.
It referred to encouraging efforts, both within WHO and through initiatives such as the Global Health Security Agenda (see Annex I describing other initiatives addressing the need to enhance preparedness planning and increase transparency), to promote evaluation frameworks, external monitoring and transparency about core capacities and underlined that regional political agencies, such as the European Union can support this work. 
Komisija je navedla obetavna prizadevanja, tako v SZO kot s pobudami, kot je agenda za globalno zdravstveno varnost (glej Prilogo I, v kateri so opisane druge pobude, namenjene boljšemu načrtovanju pripravljenosti in večji preglednosti), za spodbujanje okvirov za ocenjevanje, zunanjega spremljanja in preglednosti osnovnih zmogljivosti ter poudarila, da lahko to delo podprejo tudi regionalne politične agencije, kot je Evropska unija.
The 69th World Health Assembly (23 to 28 May 2016) considered the report of the Review Committee on the role of the IHR in the Ebola outbreak and response and arrived at a similar conclusion. 
Na 69. skupščini Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije (23.–28. maja 2016) so obravnavali poročilo Odbora za pregled o vlogi Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika v izbruhu ebole in odzivu nanj ter prišli do podobnega sklepa.
The Review Committee identified a lack of implementation of the IHR as contributing to the escalation of the Ebola outbreak. 
Odbor za pregled je navedel, da je pomanjkljivo izvajanje Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika prispevalo k stopnjevanju izbruha ebole.
The approaches proposed by the Review Committee to strengthen implementation of the IHR include recognition of external assessment of country core capacities as a best practice. 
Eden od pristopov za boljše izvajanje Mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika, ki jih je predlagal Odbor za pregled, je sprejetje zunanje ocene osnovnih zmogljivosti države kot najboljše prakse.
27 Some Member States, despite their involvement in developing the template, found it difficult in practice to reply to the preparedness questionnaire and therefore had some reservations about findings in the progress report. 
27 Čeprav so bile države članice vključene v pripravo obrazcev, so imele nekatere od njih v praksi težave pri izpolnjevanju vprašalnika o pripravljenosti, zato so imele pozneje pomisleke glede ugotovitev v poročilu o napredku.
In addition, the technical implementation of the questionnaire through the online survey showed weaknesses limiting the data quality for certain questions. 
Poleg tega so se pri tehnični izvedbi vprašalnika v obliki spletne ankete pokazale slabosti, ki so omejevale kakovost podatkov pri nekaterih vprašanjih.
This was in part due to the fact that ECDC was not involved sufficiently early by DG Health and Food Safety in the IT preparations for using the online survey tool. 
To je bilo deloma zato, ker je GD za zdravje in varnost hrane ECDC prepozno vključil v priprave IT za uporabo spletnega anketnega orodja.