natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In July 2003 the EUMC requested additional payment appropriations that were ultimately received only in December 2003. 
V juliju 2003 je Center zahteval dodatne odobritve plačil, ki jih je končno prejel šele v decembru 2003.
The EUMC would also like to emphasise the fact that in some Member States the official data that is used by the RAXEN network is not published until September. 
Center želi poudariti, da v nekaterih državah članicah uradni podatek, ki se uporablja za mrežo RAXEN, do septembra ni objavljen.
Despite all of the above, the level of carry-overs has decreased in comparison to 2002, as indicated by the Court. 
Kljub temu je po navedbah Sodišča stopnja prenosov v primerjavi z letom 2002 upadla.
The EUMC will continue its efforts to further improve the situation. 
Center bo nadaljeval s prizadevanji za dodatno izboljšanje položaja.
The EUMC agrees with the observation made by the Court and has taken appropriate measures in 2003 to prevent this occurring in the future. 
Center se strinja z ugotovitvijo Sodišča in je v letu 2003 sprejel ustrezne ukrepe za preprečitev takšnih razmer v prihodnje.
The EUMC decided not to publish its PHARE budget in an amending budget because the project dealt with non-Member States, therefore it was not within the scope of the EUMCŐs mandate as defined in its basic regulation. 
Center se je odločil, da ne objavi svojega proračuna PHARE v spremembi proračuna, ker je projekt zajemal države nečlanice in tako ni bil v okviru pooblastil Centra, kot to določa njegova osnovna uredba.
However, given the CourtŐs observation, the EUMC has included the PHARE project budget in its amending budget 2004. 
Po ugotovitvi Sodišča je Center vključil proračun projekta PHARE v spremembo proračuna za leto 2004.
10 and 11. 
10. in 11.
The EUMC agrees with the observation made by the Court and has taken measures to improve the controls over the creation of recovery orders. 
Center se strinja z ugotovitvijo Sodišča in je sprejel ukrepe za izboljšanje nadzora nad izdajanjem nalogov za izterjavo.
The EUMC re-calculated and re-submitted its claim for the reimbursement of the amount of EUR 333 474 in VAT outstanding, which the Austrian authorities settled in June 2004. 
Center je ponovno izračunal in predložil svoj zahtevek za povračilo neplačanega zneska v višini 333 474 evrov z DDV, ki so ga avstrijske oblasti poravnale v juniju 2004.
Regarding the EUR 78 000, the EUMC has amended its accounts accordingly. 
Kar se tiče 78 000 eurov, je Center v skladu s tem spremenil svoje račune.
The VAT is now analyzed on a regular basis. 
DDV se zdaj redno analizira.
The EUMC agrees with the CourtŐs observations and has, as a result, re-enforced internal controls with the introduction of a procurement helpdesk and additional training. 
Center se strinja z ugotovitvami Sodišča in je z uvedbo službe za pomoč pri javnih naročilih in dodatnega usposabljanja okrepil notranji nadzor.
The EUMC would like to point out that an open call for tender had been planned for 2003 but could not be implemented due to a lack of human resources (see reply to point 14). 
Center želi poudariti, da je bil v letu 2003 načrtovan javni razpis, ki pa ni bil izveden zaradi pomanjkanja človeških virov (glejte odgovor v točki 14).
The EUMC made an open call for tender in 2004 for a framework contract for the organisation of meetings. 
Center je v letu 2004 izvedel javni razpis za okvirno pogodbo za organizacijo srečanj.
The company that won this tender is the same company that was used throughout 2003. 
Podjetje, ki je zmagalo na tem razpisu, je isto podjetje, ki je opravljalo to delo v letu 2003.
The fact that this company was selected following the correct procurement procedure in the years prior to 2003, in the opinion of the EUMC, suggests that there were no material adverse financial consequences. 
Dejstvo, da je bilo to podjetje izbrano na podlagi pravilnih postopkov javnih naročil v letih pred 2003, je po mnenju Centra utemeljeno s tem, da ni bilo nobenih neugodnih finančnih posledic.
Internal competitions are not an infringement of the staff regulations. 
Notranji natečaji niso kršitev kadrovskih predpisov.
Given the small size of the EUMC and the absence of permanent posts, a decision was made to fill the vacant temporary posts via internal competition so as to provide staff with a certain career perspective and to fill two key positions as rapidly as possible. 
Glede na majhnost Centra in pomanjkanje delovnih mest za nedoločen čas, je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se prosta delovna mesta za določen čas zapolnijo prek notranjega natečaja, da se na ta način omogoči osebju določena poklicna kariera in da se tako hitro zapolnita dve ključni mesti.
The EUMC has, however, decided that in the future internal competitions will only be made if a certain level of competition is guaranteed. 
Center se je odločil, da bo v prihodnje izvajal notranje natečaje le v primeru, če bo zagotovljena določena raven konkurenčnosti.
Rapid case review Allocation of Cohesion policy funding to Member States for 2021-2027 March 2019 EN 
Hiter pregled primera Dodelitev finančnih sredstev kohezijske politike državam članicam za obdobje 2021–2027 marec 2019 SL
Contents Glossary Executive Summary Introduction Allocation principles and overview of process Allocation principles Overview of process Initial allocation to Member States Allocation for Investment for Jobs and Growth goal Less developed regions Transition regions More developed regions Allocation for the European Territorial Cooperation goal Allocation for the Cohesion Fund Financial weight of the allocation criteria Adjustments to initial allocation Caps and safety nets Caps Safety nets Exemptions Additional adjustments Final allocations Final remarks and next steps Annexes Paragraph I-VII 01-02 03-10 03-06 07-10 11-24 11-17 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-23 24 25-37 26-30 27 28-29 30 31-33 34-37 38-40 2 
Vsebina Glosar Povzetek Uvod Načela dodeljevanja in pregled postopka Načela dodeljevanja Pregled postopka Prvotne dodelitve državam članicam Dodelitve za cilj naložbe za delovna mesta in rast Manj razvite regije Regije v prehodu Bolj razvite regije Dodelitev za cilj evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje Dodelitev za Kohezijski sklad Finančni ponder meril za dodelitev Prilagoditve prvotnih dodelitev Zgornje meje in varnostne mreže Zgornje meje Varnostne mreže Izjeme Dodatne prilagoditve Končne dodelitve Zaključne pripombe in naslednji koraki Priloge Odstavek I–VII 01–02 03–10 03–06 07–10 11–24 11–17 12–13 14–15 16–17 18-19 20–23 24 25–37 26–30 27 28–29 30 31–33 34–37 38–40 2
Annex I — Evolution of the allocation criteria over the last three programme periods Annex II — Framework for initial allocation of Cohesion policy funds to Member States Annex III — Allocation method for less developed regions for 2021-2027 Annex IV — Allocation method for transition regions for 2021-2027 Annex V — Allocation method for more developed regions for 2021-2027 Annex VI — Allocation method for the European territorial cooperation goal (ETC) for 2021-2027 Annex VII — Allocation method for the Cohesion Fund for 2021-2027 Annex VIII — Caps and safety nets Annex IX — Criteria for ESF+ allocation adjustments Annex X — Regional classifications for ERDF/ESF+ ECA Team 3 
Priloga I – Razvoj meril za dodelitev v zadnjih treh programskih obdobjih Priloga II – Okvir za prvotno dodelitev denarnih sredstev kohezijske politike državam članicam Priloga III – Metoda dodelitve manj razvitim regijam za obdobje 2021–2027 Príloga IV – Metoda dodelitve regijam v prehodu za obdobje 2021–2027 Príloga V – Metoda dodelitve bolj razvitim regijam za obdobje 2021–2027 Priloga VI – Metoda dodelitve za cilj evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje za obdobje 2021–2027 Priloga VII – Metoda dodelitve za Kohezijski sklad za obdobje 2021–2027 Priloga VIII – Zgornje meje in varnostne mreže Priloga IX – Merila za prilagoditve dodelitev ESS+ Priloga X – Regionalne klasifikacije za ESRR/ESS+ Ekipa Evropskega računskega sodišča 3
Berlin Method: A methodology, devised in 1999, for allocating cohesion funds based on regional and national prosperity and unemployment. 
Glosar Berlinski postopek: metodologija, razvita leta 1999, po kateri se kohezijska sredstva dodeljujejo glede na regionalno in nacionalno blaginjo ter brezposelnost.
Although remaining consistent in focus, the method’s criteria have evolved with each programming period to reflect new challenges and policy objectives. 
Čeprav so se merila metodologije razvijala z vsakim programskim obdobjem, da bi odražala nove izzive in cilje politike, je njihova osredotočenost ostala dosledna.
DG REGIO: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): A fund aiming to strengthen economic and social cohesion throughout the European Union by correcting regional imbalances through financial support for priority areas: innovation and research; the digital agenda; small and medium-sized enterprises and the low carbon economy. 
Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR): sklad za krepitev ekonomske in socialne kohezije po vsej Evropski uniji, v okviru katerega se regionalna neravnovesja odpravljajo s finančno podporo prednostnim področjem: raziskavam in inovacijam, digitalni agendi, malim in srednjim podjetjem ter nizkoogljičnemu gospodarstvu.
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+): An EU fund under the 2021-2027 budgetary period for creating educational and employment opportunities and improving the situation of people at risk of poverty. 
Evropski socialni sklad plus (ESS+): sklad EU v okviru proračunskega obdobja 2021–2027 za ustvarjanje izobraževalnih in zaposlitvenih možnosti ter izboljšanje položaja ljudi, ki jih ogroža revščina.
Unlike its predecessor the European Social Fund, ESF+ encompasses the Youth Employment Initiative and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived. 
V nasprotju s svojim predhodnikom, Evropskim socialnim skladom, ESS+ vključuje pobudo za zaposlovanje mladih in Sklad za evropsko pomoč najbolj ogroženim.
European Territorial Cooperation (ETC): A framework for interregional, cross-border and transnational cooperation, guiding policy exchanges and the implementation of joint action. It is financed by ERDF. 
Evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje: okvir za medregionalno, čezmejno in transnacionalno sodelovanje na področju izmenjave politik in izvajanja skupnih ukrepov, ki se financira iz ESRR.
Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD): An instrument seeking to help the poorest members of society through combining food aid and basic material assistance with long-term social inclusion measures designed to bring them out of poverty. 
Instrument za povezovanje Evrope (IPE): instrument, s katerim se določajo prednostne naložbe in zagotavlja finančna pomoč sektorjem energetike, prometa ter informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije za ustvarjanje visokozmogljive, trajnostne in medsebojno povezane infrastrukture.
Less developed region (LDR): A region where the GDP per capita is below 75 % of the EU average. 
Manj razvita regija: regija, katere BDP na prebivalca je nižji od 75 % povprečja EU.
Outermost regions: A classification referring to nine regions in the European Union: the five French overseas departments and the French overseas community of Saint-Martin; the Spanish autonomous community of the Canary Islands; and the Portuguese autonomous regions of the Azores and Madeira. 
Najbolj oddaljene regije: klasifikacija, ki se nanaša na devet regij v Evropski uniji: pet francoskih čezmorskih departmajev in francosko čezmorsko skupnost Saint-Martin, špansko avtonomno skupnost Kanarski otoki ter portugalski avtonomni regiji Azori in Madeira.
These regions face certain constraints (remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate, economic dependence, etc) which affect their socio-economic development. 
Te regije se soočajo z nekaterimi omejitvami (oddaljenost, otoška lega, majhnost, težavna topografija in podnebje ter ekonomska odvisnost itd.), ki vplivajo na njihov socialno-ekonomski razvoj.
Premium: An additional payment made on top of the basic regional allocation in view of various socio-economic and environmental criteria. 
Premija: dodatno plačilo poleg osnovne regionalne dodelitve zaradi različnih socialno-ekonomskih in okoljskih meril.
Programme period: The period within which EU spending is planned and implemented. 
Programsko obdobje: obdobje, v katerem se načrtuje in izvršuje poraba EU.
Safety net: Minimum allocation expressed as a percentage of the allocation received in the previous programme period. 
Varnostna mreža: minimalna dodelitev, izražena kot odstotek dodelitve, prejete v prejšnjem programskem obdobju.
6 Executive Summary I The European Commission has proposed that the EU spends €373 billion in the next programme period, 2021-2027, on cohesion policy, designed to narrow the gap between rich and poor European regions. 
6 Povzetek I Evropska komisija je predlagala, da EU v naslednjem programskem obdobju, tj. v obdobju 2021–2027, porabi 373 milijard EUR za kohezijsko politiko, katere namen je zmanjšati razkorak med bogatimi in revnimi evropskimi regijami.
Funding for cohesion policy is channelled to Member States through three funds: the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) and the Cohesion Fund (CF). 
Sredstva za kohezijsko politiko se zagotavljajo državam članicam v okviru treh skladov: Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR), Evropskega socialnega sklada plus (ESS+) in Kohezijskega sklada.
II How much of the total EU budget is devoted to cohesion policy is essentially a political decision. 
II Odločitev o tem, kolikšen delež skupnega proračuna EU se nameni kohezijski politiki, je predvsem politična.
The amount allocated to each Member State is governed by a series of processes, which have been broadly similar since the 2000-2006 period. 
Znesek, dodeljen posamezni državi članici, je določen z vrsto postopkov, ki so na splošno ostali zelo podobni tistim iz obdobja 2000–2006.
For 2021-2027, the Commission published its allocation methodology proposals as part of its much wider proposals for a ‘common provisions regulation’ (CPR), governing the whole operation of the three shared management funds referred to above, together with four other smaller funds. 
Komisija je svoje predloge o metodologiji dodelitve za obdobje 2021–2027 objavila v okviru svojih veliko širših predlogov za uredbo o skupnih določbah, s katero se ureja celotno delovanje treh skladov z deljenim upravljanjem, navedenih zgoraj, in štirih drugih manjših skladov.
The processes determining the amounts available to Member States are relatively complicated. 
Postopki za določanje zneskov, ki so na voljo državam članicam, so razmeroma zapleteni.
The aim of this rapid case review is therefore to set these processes out, within their context, so that stakeholders can understand the rationale behind, and operation of, these processes. 
Cilj tega hitrega pregleda primera je zato predstaviti te postopke v posameznem kontekstu, da bi deležniki lahko razumeli njihovo utemeljitev in delovanje.
III Within cohesion policy, the Commission proposes to allocate a total of €326.3 billion to the ERDF/ESF+, and the remainder, €46.7 billion, to the CF. 
III Komisija v okviru kohezijske politike predlaga, da se 326,3 milijarde EUR dodeli za ESRR/ESS+, preostale 46,7 milijarde EUR pa za Kohezijski sklad.
Within the former, there are two high level goals: Investment for jobs and growth (€316.8 billion), and European territorial cooperation (€9.5 billion). 
Cilja na visoki ravni, določena za prva dva sklada, sta naložbe za delovna mesta in rast (316,8 milijarde EUR) ter evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje (9,5 milijarde EUR).
The allocation processes vary: o Within the Investment for jobs and growth goal, different processes are used for the three categories of regional wealth (less developed, transition and more developed). 
Postopki dodelitve se razlikujejo: o v okviru cilja naložbe za rast in delovna mesta se za tri kategorije regionalne blaginje (manj razvite regije, regije v prehodu in bolj razvite regije) uporabljajo različni postopki.
The main criterion determining funding is relative prosperity, but regions can also benefit from additional premiums relating to socio-economic and environmental factors: unemployment, particularly youth unemployment, educational attainment, greenhouse gas emissions and migration. 
Čeprav je glavno merilo za določitev finančnih sredstev relativna blaginja, so lahko regije upravičene do dodatnih premij na podlagi različnih socialno-ekonomskih in okoljskih dejavnikov: brezposelnost, zlasti brezposelnost mladih, stopnja izobrazbe, emisije toplogrednih plinov in migracije.
The last two of these factors are proposed for the first time for 2021-2027. o The European territorial cooperation goal, funding is allocated to regions primarily on the basis of the populations affected. o Funding from the CF is available to Member States whose wealth is less than 90 % of the EU average. 
Zadnja dva od teh dejavnikov sta za obdobje 2021–2027 prvič predlagana, o Finančna sredstva v okviru cilja evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje se dodelijo regijam predvsem na podlagi zadevnega prebivalstva, o finančna sredstva iz Kohezijskega sklada so na voljo državam članicam, katerih blaginja je nižja od 90 % povprečja EU.
Funding is allocated on the basis of eligible Member States’ populations and areas, adjusted for relative prosperity. 
Dodelijo se na podlagi prebivalstva in območij upravičenih držav članic, prilagojenih za relativno blaginjo.
In total, relative wealth determines just over 80 % of the allocations. 
Skupno je od relativne blaginje odvisnih le nekaj več kot 80 % dodelitev.
IV As in previous periods, the allocations resulting from the processes set out above are subject to further adjustments designed to mitigate significant fluctuations in the amounts received by individual Member States. 
IV Dodelitve na podlagi zgoraj opisanih postopkov se tako kot v prejšnjih obdobjih dodatno prilagodijo, da se zmanjšajo znatna nihanja zneskov, ki jih prejmejo posamezne države članice.
These adjustments take the form of caps limiting the maximum amount receivable, and safety nets guaranteeing a minimum level of funding. 
Te prilagoditve so zgornje meje, s katerimi se omeji najvišji znesek, ki se lahko prejme, in varnostne mreže, s katerimi se zagotovi minimalna raven finančnih sredstev.
V The Commission proposes two further adjustments, after the caps and safety nets have been taken into account. 
V Komisija po upoštevanju zgornjih mej in varnostnih mrež predlaga dve nadaljnji prilagoditvi.
First, the Commission has proposed to maintain the transfer of €11 billion from the CF to the directly-managed Connecting Europe Facility (CEF). 
S prvo predlaga, da se ohrani prenos 11 milijard EUR iz Kohezijskega sklada v Instrument za povezovanje Evrope (IPE), ki se upravlja neposredno.
And separately from its initial CPR proposal, the Commission proposed a methodology for allocating funds to the ESF+ with a view to distinguishing the allocations for ESF+ (€100 billion in total) and the ERDF at Member State level. 
Poleg tega je Komisija ločeno od svojega prvotnega predloga za uredbo o skupnih določbah predlagala metodologijo dodelitve denarnih sredstev za ESS+, po kateri naj bi se razlikovalo med dodelitvami za ESS+ (skupaj 100 milijard EUR) in ESRR na ravni držav članic.
The main criterion is the proportion of ESF resources received by each Member State for the 2014-2020 period, adjusted by reference to two additional criteria relating to youth unemployment and social inclusion. 
Glavno merilo je delež sredstev ESS, ki jih je posamezna država članica prejela za obdobje 2014–2020, prilagojen na podlagi dveh dodatnih meril, ki se nanašata na brezposelnost mladih in socialno vključevanje.
VI The Commission’s proposal would mean that Member States received, in total, 10 % less cohesion policy funding in 2021-2027 than in the previous period. 
VI Po predlogu Komisije bi države članice v obdobju 2021–2027 prejele skupno 10 % manj finančnih sredstev kohezijske politike kot v prejšnjem obdobju.
A significant factor for changes in individual allocations is the changed prosperity level of many regions (and some Member States), leading to a reclassification of their status (for example, from less developed to transition). 
Pomemben dejavnik sprememb pri posameznih dodelitvah je spremenjena raven blaginje številnih regij (in nekaterih držav članic), kar privede do prerazvrstitve njihovega statusa (na primer iz manj razvite regije v regijo v prehodu).
The effect of the caps and safety nets means that no Member State would receive an increase in cohesion policy funding of more than 8 %, or a reduction of more than 24 %. 
Zaradi zgornjih mej in varnostnih mrež nobena država članica ne bi prejela več kot 8 % več ali več kot 24 % manj finančnih sredstev kohezijske politike.
The total share of cohesion policy funding going to less developed regions under the proposal would remain constant, at 75 % of available funding. 
Skupni delež finančnih sredstev kohezijske politike, namenjen manj razvitim regijam, naj bi v skladu s predlogom ostal konstanten, in sicer 75 % razpoložljivih finančnih sredstev.
VII The final stage of the process takes place outside the methodology proposed by the Commission, in political negotiations involving the EU and the Member States. 
VII Končna faza postopka ni odvisna od metodologije, ki jo predlaga Komisija, temveč od političnih pogajanj, pri katerih sodelujejo EU in države članice.
In previous periods, these negotiations gave rise to additional allocations to certain Member States and regions. 
V prejšnjih obdobjih so bile nekaterim državam članicam in regijam dodeljena dodatna sredstva na podlagi teh pogajanj.
As at February 2019, the revised timetable – in line with European Council conclusions – is to reach a compromise on the multiannual financial framework (MFF) in the autumn of 2019 and to finalise the CPR negotiations shortly afterwards. 8 
Cilj spremenjenega časovnega razporeda (stanje februarja 2019) je glede na sklepe Evropskega sveta doseči kompromis o večletnem finančnem okviru jeseni leta 2019 in kmalu zatem zaključiti pogajanja o uredbi o skupnih določbah. 8
Introduction 01 Cohesion policy – designed ‘to promote economic, social and territorial cohesion among Member States’ – is one of the most significant areas of European Union (EU) activity, accounting for around a third of its budget. 
Uvod 01 Kohezijska politika je eno najpomembnejših področij dejavnosti Evropske unije, ki zajema približno tretjino njenega proračuna, njen cilj pa je spodbujanje ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije med državami članicami.
Each Member State is entitled to spend a fixed sum, channelled through different funding mechanisms, pursuing Cohesion objectives. 
Vsaka država članica ima pravico, da za doseganje kohezijskih ciljev porabi določen znesek, ki se zagotovi v okviru različnih mehanizmov financiranja.
The aim of this rapid case review is to set these processes out, within their context, to help readers understand the rationale behind, and operation of, these processes. 
Cilj tega hitrega pregleda primera je predstaviti te postopke v posameznem kontekstu, da bi bralci lažje razumeli njihovo utemeljitev in delovanje.
02 Since this rapid case review is not an audit report, it contains no audit judgements, conclusions or recommendations. 
02 Ker ta hiter pregled primera ni revizijsko poročilo, ne vsebuje revizijskih presoj, zaključkov ali priporočil.
Our focus is the proposed allocation of cohesion funds for the next programme period, 2021-2027, on which the EU legislators are expected to decide within the next 12 months. 
Sodišče se je osredotočilo na predlagano dodelitev kohezijskih sredstev za naslednje programsko obdobje, tj. obdobje 2021–2027, o kateri naj bi zakonodajalca EU odločila v naslednjih 12 mesecih.
We compare these proposals with previous periods where appropriate. 
Predloge je primerjalo s prejšnjimi obdobji, kadar je bilo to ustrezno.