natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Another area of shared Pillar I and Pillar II costs is the purchase or maintenance of IT equipment or software. 
Še eno področje, na katerem so stroški deljeni med prvim in drugim stebrom, je nakup ali vzdrževanje informacijskotehnološke ali programske opreme.
In Poland, the coefficient used to apportion IT maintenance spending to rural development activities at the paying agency was at least four years out of date. 
Na Poljskem koeficient, s katerim se je na plačilni agenciji poraba za vzdrževanje informacijskotehnološke opreme razdeljevala med dejavnostmi razvoja podeželja, vsaj štiri leta ni bil posodobljen.
In Italy, it was not clear that video‐conferencing equipment purchased by the Ministry of Agriculture and charged solely to the EAFRD was exclusively for Pillar II use. 
V Italiji ni bilo jasno, ali se oprema za videokonference, ki jo je kupilo ministrstvo za kmetijstvo in je bila zaračunana izključno v okviru EKSRP, uporablja samo za namene v okviru drugega stebra.
A final shared area concerns cross‐compliance checks23, where, if no clear distinction is made by type of support, it is possible for action taken under the EAGF to benefit from funding intended exclusively for the EAFRD. 
Še zadnje področje, na katerem se pojavlja delitev, so pregledi navzkrižne skladnosti23. Če pri teh ni jasnega razlikovanja med vrstama podpore, lahko ukrep, ki se izvaja v okviru EKJS, pridobi financiranje, namenjeno izključno za EKSRP.
In Austria, the coefficient used to attribute cross‐compliance inspection costs to SPS claims (ineligible) as compared with agri‐environment claims under rural development (eligible) was not updated each year. 
V Avstriji ni bil vsako leto posodobljen koeficient, s katerim se stroški inšpekcijskih pregledov v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo dodeljujejo zahtevkom v okviru sheme enotnega plačila (neupravičenim) oziroma kmetijsko-okoljskim zahtevkom v okviru razvoja podeželja (upravičenim).
In 2011 this initially resulted in an overpayment of 15 600 euro from the EAFRD. 
Leta 2011 je to v začetku povzročilo preplačilo iz EKSRP v višini 15 600 EUR.
23 ‘Cross‐compliance’ is the requirement that farmers receiving direct payments under Pillar I should meet basic environmental, food safety, animal and plant health and animal welfare standards. 
23 Navzkrižna skladnost je zahteva, da kmetje, ki prejemajo neposredna plačila v okviru prvega stebra, izpolnjujejo osnovne standarde na področju okolja, varnosti hrane, zdravja živali in rastlin ter dobrobiti živali.
It also applies to most Pillar II environmental payments. Box 2 
Velja tudi za večino okoljskih plačil v okviru drugega stebra. Okvir 2
Observations 26 Procurement irregularities 57 The audit revealed many problems with contracting and procurement practices in the Member States (af‐ fecting 17 of 51 audited procurement procedures, mainly in the area of information and publicity activities). 
Opažanja 26 Nepravilnosti pri javnem naročanju 57 Revizija je odkrila veliko problemov pri praksah sklepanja pogodb in javnega naročanja v državah članicah (vplivali so na 17 od 51 revidiranih postopkov javnega naročanja, zlasti na področju dejavnosti informiranja in obveščanja javnosti).
The issues that arose included the use of direct negotiation rather than com‐ petitive tendering to award contracts, in contravention of the provisions on transparency, equal treatment and non‐discrimination in the Procure‐ ment Directive24 and, in some cases, the relevant national rules. 
Med problemi, ki so se pokazali, je bila uporaba neposrednih pogajanj namesto konkurenčnih javnih razpisov pri oddaji pogodb, kar je kršitev določb o preglednosti, enakem obravnavanju in nediskriminaciji iz direktive o javnem naročanju24 in v nekaterih primerih ustreznih nacionalnih pravil.
Use of the wrong procedure not only breaches EU and/or national law; it also subverts the open market rules, discriminates against other potential contractors and may result in overspending. 
Uporaba napačnega postopka ne krši le zakonodaje EU in/ali nacionalne zakonodaje, pač pa tudi spodkopava pravila odprtega trga, diskriminira druge morebitne pogodbenike in lahko povzroči preveliko porabo.
24 Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 
24 Direktiva 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev (UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str.
Examples of procurement irregularities Use of the wrong procedure In Italy, two travel agency services (worth 170 000 and 130 000 euro respectively) were purchased by direct negotiation, in contravention of the national rules stating that contracts exceeding 40 000 euro must be open to competition. 
Primeri nepravilnosti pri javnem naročanju Uporaba napačnega postopka V Italiji sta bili dve storitvi potovalne agencije (ena vredna 170 000 EUR, druga pa 130 000 EUR) kupljeni z neposrednimi pogajanji, v nasprotju z nacionalnimi pravili, ki določajo, da morajo biti pogodbe v vrednosti nad 40 000 EUR odprte za konkurenco.
In Poland, direct negotiation was used without justification to conclude contracts with a subordinate gov‐ ernment department (hotel, catering, conference and training services) and with a previous contractor (IT services delivered to a government agency). 
Na Poljskem so bila brez utemeljitve uporabljena neposredna pogajanja za sklepanje pogodb s podrejenim vladnim oddelkom (hotel, priprava in dostava hrane, konferenčne storitve in storitve usposabljanja) in nekdanjim pogodbenikom (informacijskotehnološke storitve, zagotovljene vladni agenciji).
Overpricing of contracts In Hungary, a complex framework contract with an events organiser was awarded in 2008 on the basis of unit prices which would still have been too high even six years later. 
Določanje previsokih cen pogodb Na Madžarskem je bila leta 2008 kompleksna okvirna pogodba z organizatorjem prireditev oddana na podlagi cen na enoto, ki bi bile previsoke celo še šest let pozneje.
The overpriced contract was subsequently terminated two years early. 
Pogodba s previsoko ceno je bila nato prekinjena dve leti prezgodaj.
Tender specifications an obstacle to transparency and equal treatment In Italy, the audit revealed multiple instances of public calls for tender with limited or imprecise information concerning the technical criteria which would be taken into account when an award was made. 
Razpisne specifikacije ovirajo preglednost in enako obravnavanje V Italiji je revizija pokazala številne primere javnih povabil k oddaji ponudb z omejenimi ali nenatančnimi informacijami o tehničnih merilih, ki naj bi se uporabljala pri oddaji naročila.
This made it difficult for competent but inexperienced tenderers to formulate their bids correctly, and it also complicated the task of assessing the relative merits of bids and justifying the final award decision. Box 3 
Zato so kompetentni, vendar neizkušeni ponudniki težko pravilno oblikovali ponudbe, poleg tega pa je bilo zapletenejše oceniti relativne prednosti ponudb in utemeljiti končno odločitev o oddaji naročila. Okvir 3
Observations 27 Control systems poorly applied 58 Notwithstanding the comments in paragraph 56, we found that the Member States’ systems of controls to determine whether costs were cor‐ rectly assigned to Pillar II did not func‐ tion properly. 
Opažanja 27 Slaba uporaba kontrolnih sistemov 58 Ne glede na pripombe iz odstavka 56 smo ugotovili, da sistemi kontrol, ki jih uporabljajo države članice za ugotavljanje, ali so bili stroški pravilno dodeljeni v okvir drugega stebra, niso pravilno delovali.
In many cases where the Member States had specified coeffi‐ cients or other calculations to estab‐ lish the division of costs between the EAGF and EAFRD, the formulae were not systematically applied or were updated on an irregular basis, yet no checks had identified these failings for correction. 
V številnih primerih, ko so države članice določile koeficiente ali druge izračune za ugotavljanje delitve stroškov med EKJS in EKSRP, formule niso bile uporabljene sistematično ali pa se niso redno posodabljale, vendar nobeni pregledi niso pokazali, da bi bilo treba te pomanjkljivosti odpraviti.
In this regard it is encour‐ aging to note that, since the audit, the Commission has reinforced the rules governing Member States’ checks of TA expenditure25. 
Spodbudno pa je, da je po reviziji Komisija okrepila pravila za preglede, ki jih države članice izvajajo za odhodke za tehnično pomoč25.
How suitable is the performance framework for TA? 
Kakšna je primernost okvira smotrnosti poslovanja za tehnično pomoč?
60 The preamble to the financial regula‐ tion establishes economy, efficiency and effectiveness as the core princi‐ ples of sound financial management in all areas of budget spending. 
60 Uvodna izjava finančne uredbe določa, da so gospodarnost, učinkovitost in uspešnost temeljna načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja na vseh področjih proračunske porabe.
To safeguard these principles, SMART26 objectives must be set for each sector of activity and monitored by means of performance indicators, leading to an‐ nual ‘activity statements’. The institu‐ tions (in this case the Commission) are required, finally, to make ex ante and ex post evaluations.27 61 In the context of shared management, the above tasks are delegated to the Member States, which are responsible for ensuring that funds are used in ac‐ cordance with the applicable rules and principles.28 62 The use of all CAP funding is therefore tightly regulated by requirements relating to guarantees on the ap‐ propriateness of expenditure. 
Za zaščito teh načel je treba za vsak sektor dejavnosti določiti cilje SMART26 in jih spremljati s kazalniki smotrnosti poslovanja, na podlagi česar nato nastanejo letne izjave o dejavnostih. In nazadnje, institucije (v tem primeru Komisija) morajo opraviti predhodno in naknadno vrednotenje27. 61 Pri deljenem upravljanju so zgornje naloge prenesene na države članice, ki so odgovorne za zagotavljanje porabe sredstev v skladu z veljavnimi pravili in načeli28.
The audit revealed that the implementing authorities frequently exclude TA from the scope of these rules. 
Revizija je pokazala, da izvajalski organi za tehnično pomoč pogosto ne uporabljajo teh pravil.
However, as explained in Box 4, the obligations in the financial regulation are equally valid for TA as an activity in the ‘Agri‐ culture and rural development’ policy area. 
Kot je pojasnjeno v okviru 4, pa obveznosti iz finančne uredbe enako veljajo za tehnično pomoč kot dejavnost na področju kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja.
25 Article 62 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the integrated administration and control system, rural development measures and cross compliance (OJ L 227, 31.7.2014, p. 
25 V členu 62 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 809/2014 z dne 17. julija 2014 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št.
69) expressly places Member States’ TA expenditure under the general requirement for administrative and on‐the‐spot checks and reporting. 
69) je izrecno določeno, da za odhodke držav članic za tehnično pomoč velja splošna zahteva za upravne preglede, preglede na kraju samem in poročanje.
It also emphasises independence by stipulating that control bodies must be ‘functionally independent’ from the bodies authorising payment. 
Z določbo, da mora biti kontrolni organ „funkcionalno neodvisen” od organa, ki odobri plačilo, je poudarjena tudi neodvisnost.
26 ‘Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed’. 
26 Specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, ustrezni in časovno opredeljeni.
27 The principles and rules in this paragraph are covered by Article 27 of the 2002 financial regulation. 
27 Načela in pravila iz tega odstavka so zajeta v členu 27 finančne uredbe iz leta 2002.
28 See Article 53b of the 2002 financial regulation. 
28 Glej člen 53b finančne uredbe iz leta 2002.
Observations 28 Is TA an activity or just a tool? 
Opažanja 28 Ali je tehnična pomoč dejavnost ali samo orodje?
The audit generally found that the responsible authorities consider TA, as a source of administrative support for essential funding operations, to be exempt from the regulatory requirements on performance. 
Pri reviziji je bilo na splošno ugotovljeno, da odgovorni organi menijo, da je tehnična pomoč kot vir administrativne podpore za bistvene operacije financiranja izvzeta iz regulativnih zahtev o smotrnosti poslovanja.
For Austria, TA is purely and simply a tool for implementing the RDP, and the only yardstick for its effectiveness is pro‐ gramme success. 
Avstrija jo razume kot orodje za izvajanje programa razvoja podeželja, katerega uspešnost je mogoče meriti samo z uspehom programa.
In this view, TA cannot be planned and cannot be assigned objectives or indicators, which more properly belong to the core measures29 to which it contributes. 
Pri takem gledanju tehnične pomoči ni mogoče načrtovati in ji dodeliti ciljev ali kazalnikov, ki so bolj ustrezni za temeljne ukrepe,29 h katerim prispeva.
For the Commission, presenting TA as a separate consolidated activity in its own right would make it difficult to assess the input made in each rural development activity area. 
Komisiji bi prikazovanje tehnične pomoči kot ločene samostojne konsolidirane dejavnosti otežilo ocenjevanje vložkov na posameznih področjih dejavnosti razvoja podeželja.
This reasoning, which casts TA funding as somehow passive and not part of the operational performance framework, is contradicted by the regulations. 
Tako razmišljanje, po katerem je financiranje v okviru tehnične pomoči pasivno in ni del okvira operativne smotrnosti poslovanja, ni v skladu z uredbami.
Article 66 of the EAFRD regulation calls TA both an ‘activity’ and a ‘measure’, and Article 2(d) defines ‘measure’ as ‘a set of operations contributing to the implementation of an axis’. 
V členu 66 uredbe o EKSRP se za tehnično pomoč uporabljata tako izraz dejavnost kot ukrep, v členu 2(d) pa je ukrep opredeljen kot „niz aktivnosti, ki pripomorejo k izvajanju nalog ene osi”.
Moreover, given the volume of funds committed to TA spending, particularly in the Member States (over 1.5 billion euro), it is essential to have clarity that it is soundly managed and contributing to programme im‐ plementation. 
Poleg tega je glede na obseg sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti za porabo za tehnično pomoč, zlasti v državah članicah (več kot 1,5 milijarde EUR), bistveno, da se jasno pokaže, da se ta pomoč dobro upravlja in prispeva k izvajanju programa.
This can best be achieved by correctly planning, monitoring and evaluating its specific impacts. 
To je mogoče najlažje doseči s pravilnim načrtovanjem, spremljanjem in vrednotenjem njenih specifičnih učinkov.
29 As described in Title IV, chapter I, of the EAFRD regulation. 
29 Kot je opisano v poglavju I naslova IV uredbe o EKSRP.
TA is dealt with in Title IV, chapter II. 
Tehnična pomoč je obravnavana v poglavju II naslova IV.
63 Although TA is a small part of global spending, it represents a significant amount of money over the program‐ ming period and needs to be duly accounted for. 
63 Čeprav je tehnična pomoč le majhen del skupne porabe, se zanjo v programskem obdobju nameni velik znesek, zato jo je treba ustrezno utemeljiti.
Despite assurances from the Commission and the Mem‐ ber States that their TA spending on non‐operational costs is both nec‐ essary and proportionate, and that it makes a valuable contribution to programme success, by and large, no performance framework exists to demonstrate that this is the case. 
Kljub zagotovilom Komisije in držav članic, da je njihova poraba za tehnično pomoč za neoperativne stroške potrebna in sorazmerna ter da koristno prispeva k uspehu programa, pa na splošno ne obstaja okvir smotrnosti poslovanja, ki bi dokazoval, da je res tako.
The field is characterised by inadequate multiannual planning, no proper needs assessment, imprecise objectives (thus not SMART), and no performance‐ori‐ ented monitoring and evaluation of TA programmes (instead financial aspects are given the greatest weight). 
Za področje je značilno, da je večletno načrtovanje neustrezno, da ni ustrezne ocene potreb, da so cilji nenatančni (in torej niso SMART) ter da ni spremljanja in vrednotenja programov tehnične pomoči s poudarkom na smotrnosti poslovanja (namesto tega se največja teža namenja finančnim vidikom).
Observations 29 Poor planning and assessment of needs 64 So that objectives can be developed and targets set appropriately, it is important to perform an initial needs assessment and plan for the medium and long term. 
Opažanja 29 Slabo načrtovanje in ocenjevanje potreb 64 Zaradi ustrezne priprave ciljev in ožjih ciljev je pomembno, da se opravita začetna ocena potreb ter srednje-in dolgoročno načrtovanje.
This is, moreover, part of the ex ante evaluation procedure laid down in the EAFRD regulation30. 
To je tudi del postopka predhodnega vrednotenja, ki je določen v uredbi o EKSRP30.
65 At the Commission, one upshot of the perception of TA spending as admin‐ istrative support is that it is largely considered to be annual expenditure. 
65 Na Komisiji je ena posledic tega, da se poraba za tehnično pomoč razume kot administrativna podpora, da v veliki meri šteje za letni odhodek.
In almost all activity areas (with the exception of studies and evaluations and the ENRD), there was neither an initial needs assessment for the period nor multiannual planning of the use of funds. 
Na skoraj nobenem področju dejavnosti (razen študij, vrednotenj in Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja) ni bilo začetne ocene potreb za obdobje in večletnega načrtovanja porabe sredstev.
This meant, in some cases, that budget allocations were renewed from one year to the next without confirma‐ tion whether the (short‐term) need expressed some years previously was still valid. 
V nekaterih primerih je to pomenilo, da so se proračunske dodelitve vsako leto obnavljale, ne da bi bilo potrjeno, ali je (kratkoročna) potreba izpred nekaj let še vedno veljavna.
Moreover, without a proper needs assessment, implementation can become random and unfocused. 
Poleg tega lahko izvajanje brez ustrezne ocene potreb postane naključno in neosredotočeno.
66 The EAFRD regulation required Mem‐ ber States to undertake an ex ante eval‐ uation of their RDPs so as to ‘identify and appraise medium and long‐term needs, the goals to be achieved, the results expected, the quantified tar‐ gets particularly in terms of impact in relation to the baseline situation, the Community value‐added, the extent to which the Community’s priorities have been taken into account, the lessons drawn from previous programming and the quality of the procedures for implementation, monitoring, evalua‐ tion and financial management.'31 67 Just like the Commission, the five Member States generally omitted TA from their multiannual rural develop‐ ment needs assessment. 
66 Uredba o EKSRP je zahtevala, da države članice opravijo predhodno vrednotenje svojih programov razvoja podeželja, da „se ugotavljajo in ocenjujejo srednjeročne in dolgoročne potrebe, cilji, ki jih je treba doseči, pričakovani rezultati, ovrednoteni cilji, še zlasti z vidika učinka na izhodiščno stanje, dodana vrednost Skupnosti, v kolikšni meri se upoštevajo prednostne naloge Skupnosti, spoznanja, pridobljena na podlagi prejšnjih programiranj ter kakovost postopkov izvajanja, spremljanja, vrednotenja in finančnega poslovodenja”31. 67 Enako kot Komisija je tudi pet držav članic iz svojih večletnih ocen potreb na področju razvoja podeželja običajno izpustilo tehnično pomoč.
The main consequence of this policy came in the form of unstable TA budgets subject to change by administrative decree. 
Glavna posledica te politike so nestabilni proračuni za tehnično pomoč, ki se lahko spreminjajo z upravnim odlokom.
Even in Poland, which did produce a TA needs assessment for one com‐ ponent of its RDP, the initial budget was significantly underestimated. 
Celo na Poljskem, kjer so za eno komponento svojega programa razvoja podeželja pripravili oceno potreb po tehnični pomoči, je bil začetni proračun bistveno podcenjen.
In keeping with its hands‐off approach to Member State spending under this heading, the Commission accepted the necessary programme amendments without reservation. 
Komisija je v skladu s svojim pristopom nevmešavanja v porabo držav članic v okviru te postavke brez pridržka sprejela potrebne spremembe programa.
30 Article 85. 
30 Člen 85.
31 Article 85. 
31 Člen 85.
Observations 30 Objectives far from SMART 68 The purpose of SMART objectives is to target funding more precisely and thus achieve specific ends more efficiently. 
Opažanja 30 Cilji še zdaleč niso SMART 68 Namen ciljev SMART je natančnejše usmerjanje financiranja in na ta način učinkovitejše doseganje posebnih ciljev.
Objectives that are SMART also provide a clearer framework for monitoring and the evaluation of results. 
Cilji, ki so SMART, dajejo tudi jasnejši okvir za spremljanje in vrednotenje rezultatov.
69 Because of its inadequate planning and needs assessment, the Com‐ mission generally failed to develop SMART objectives for TA funding. 
69 Komisija zaradi svojega neustreznega načrtovanja in ocene potreb običajno ni razvila ciljev SMART za financiranje v okviru tehnične pomoči.
TA does not appear in DG Agriculture and Rural Development’s detailed annual management plans summarising the department’s objectives and indicators for the coming year — even though the projects and actions supported by TA funding are included in those plans. 
Ta pomoč ni omenjena v podrobnih letnih načrtih upravljanja GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, v katerih so povzeti cilji in kazalniki oddelka za prihajajoče leto, čeprav so v te načrte vključeni projekti in ukrepi, ki se podpirajo s financiranjem v okviru tehnične pomoči.
Nor do the operational financing deci‐ sions prepared by the DG have SMART objectives or indicators for TA projects, which are treated in the same way as the Commission’s general administra‐ tive expenditure. 
Prav tako sklepi o operativnem financiranju, ki jih pripravlja Generalni direktorat, ne vsebujejo ciljev SMART ali kazalnikov za projekte tehnične pomoči, ki se obravnavajo enako kot splošni administrativni odhodki Komisije.
The only exception is the area of evaluations and studies, which, as already noted, benefit from multiannual planning and have SMART objectives which are built into the requirements of the relevant specific regulations. 
Edina izjema je področje vrednotenj in študij. Kot je bilo že omenjeno, se zanj uporabljajo večletno načrtovanje in cilji SMART, ki so del zahtev ustreznih posebnih uredb.
70 In the Member States, little was done to develop specific TA objectives. 
70 V državah članicah je bilo za pripravo posebnih ciljev tehnične pomoči storjeno le malo.
The lack of multiannual planning in dis‐ crete areas of TA activity (e.g. national rural network information and commu‐ nication measures) hindered transpar‐ ency and the definition of objectives. 
To, da na posameznih področjih dejavnosti tehnične pomoči (npr. ukrepi informiranja in komunikacijski ukrepi v zvezi z nacionalno mrežo za podeželje) ni večletnega načrtovanja, je oviralo preglednost in opredeljevanje ciljev.
Nor did it help that there was no clear distinction between individual TA activity areas, or between them and other similar activities unrelated to the aims of the EAFRD. 
Prav tako ni pomagalo, da ni bilo jasne razmejitve med posameznimi področji dejavnosti tehnične pomoči ali med njimi in drugimi podobnimi dejavnostmi, ki niso povezane s cilji EKSRP.
Of the five Member States visited, only Italy went beyond the general scope of the regulations. However, even in Italy the objectives were unquantified and lacked a time horizon. 
Od petih obiskanih držav članic je samo Italija presegla splošni obseg uredb, toda tudi tam cilji niso bili količinsko in časovno opredeljeni.