natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
TABLE 8 BIDS RECEIVED, REJECTED AND ADMITTED 25 Procurement Companies invited to negotiated procedures Bids received Bids admitted Bids rejected Percentage of bids rejected Buildings N/A 58 44 14 24,1 % Furniture N/A 19 18 1 5,3 % Pillars 5 5 4 1 20,0 % Concrete 7 4 1 3 75,0 % Seismic isolators 5 3 2 1 33,0 % Source: European Court of Auditors’ analysis based on tender documents. 
TABELA 8 PREJETE, ZAVRNJENE IN SPREJEMLJIVE PONUDBE 25 Javno naročanje Družbe, povabljene k sodelovanju v postopkih s pogajanji Prejete ponudbe Sprejemljive ponudbe, ki so izpolnjevale pogoje Zavrnjene ponudbe Delež zavrnjenih ponudb v odstotkih Stavbe NR 58 44 14 24,1 % Pohištvo NR 19 18 1 5,3 % Stebri 5 5 4 1 20,0 % Beton 7 4 1 3 75,0 % Potresni izolatorji 5 3 2 1 33,0 % Vir: Analiza Evropskega računskega sodišča na podlagi razpisne dokumentacije.
BOX 1 REASONS FOR THE REJECTION OF BIDS Among the five inadmissible bids for negotiated procedures, there was one company that requested postponement of the deadlines for the submission of tender documents (supply of pillars). 
OKVIR 1 RAZLOGI ZA ZAVRNITEV PONUDB Med petimi nesprejemljivimi ponudbami za postopke s pogajanji je bila ponudba družbe, ki je prosila za preložitev rokov za predložitev razpisnih dokumentov (dobava stebrov).
In addition, two bids were rejected because they did not include an offer for the first lot (concrete) or because of missing documents (concrete and seismic isolators). 
Poleg tega sta bili dve ponudbi zavrnjeni, ker nista vsebovali ponudbe za prvi sklop (beton) ali zaradi manjkajočih dokumentov (beton in potresni izolatorji).
For the open tenders for buildings, one bid arrived too late, five offers did not comply with the rules relating to the envelopes and in four cases there were some documents missing — in two cases the bids did not specify which labour contract was applied, and in another two cases the ‘antimafia’34 certificate was missing. 
Pri odprtem razpisu za stavbe je ena ponudba prispela prepozno, pet jih ni bilo skladnih s pravili o pisemskih ovojnicah, v štirih primerih pa je manjkalo nekaj dokumentov – v dveh primerih v ponudbi ni bilo navedeno, katera delovna pogodba se uporablja, v dveh drugih pa je manjkalo „protimafijsko“ potrdilo34.
34 Certificate of non-involvement in organised crime issued by the Italian Chamber of Commerce. 
34 Potrdilo o nevpletenosti v organizirani kriminal, ki ga izda trgovinska zbornica Italije.
Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 26 INADEQUATE SPLITTING OF CONTRACTS INTO LOTS 41. 
Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov 26 NEUSTREZNA DELITEV NAROČIL V SKLOPE 41.
Breaking down tenders into lots of reasonable size also increases competition. 
Razdelitev naročil v razumno velike sklope tudi povečuje konkurenco.
However, unlike the procurement of buildings, which was split into a high number of lots in order to guarantee a sufficient number of bidders and better success, negotiated procedures were not adequately split into lots. 
Toda za razliko od javnega naročila za stavbe, ki je bilo razdeljeno na številne sklope, da bi bilo zagotovljeno dovolj veliko število ponudnikov in večji uspeh, postopki s pogajanji niso bili ustrezno razdeljeni v sklope.
This was especially evident for the supply of concrete, where one of the three lots was so big that two of the four bidders did not include a financial offer for the first lot because it exceeded their production capacity35 and were therefore excluded from the procurement of the remaining lots. 
To je bilo še posebno očitno pri dobavi betona, kjer je bil eden od treh sklopov tako velik, da dva od štirih ponudnikov nista vključila finančne ponudbe za prvi sklop, ker je presegal njune proizvodne zmogljivosti35, in sta bila zato izključena tudi iz oddaje javnega naročila za preostala sklopa.
35 Asdeclaredbyonebidding company and recorded in the tender evaluation committee minutes. 
35 Izjava ene od družb ponudnic, zabeležena v zapisniku komisije za ocenjevanje ponudb.
BOX 2 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES The EU financial regulation and the public procurement directive specify that tenders can be awarded by using either the ‘lowest price’ criterion or the ‘best-value-for-money’ criterion. 
OKVIR 2 POSTOPKI ZA ODDAJO JAVNIH NAROČIL Finančna uredba EU in direktiva o javnih naročilih določata, da je mogoče javna naročila oddati z uporabo merila „najnižje cene“ ali merila „ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe“.
Tendering procedures set minimum criteria (selection criteria) that companies willing to participate in a tender have to comply with. 
Pri razpisnih postopkih so določena minimalna merila (izbirna merila), ki jih morajo izpolnjevati družbe, ki so pripravljene sodelovati v javnem razpisu.
The bids clearing this first hurdle are then evaluated against the award criteria (lowest price or best value for money). 
Ponudbe, ki premagajo to prvo oviro, se nato ovrednotijo glede na merila za dodeljevanje (najnižja cena ali ekonomsko najugodnejša ponudba).
Tenders for the CASE project were awarded according to the best-value-for-money criterion. 
Naročila za projekt CASE so bila oddana v skladu z merilom ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe.
This criterion envisages that bidders present their offers in two different envelopes, one describing the characteristics of the works/goods/services offered (technical offer) and one indicating the price (financial offer). 
Pri tem merilu se predvideva, da ponudniki oddajo ponudbe v dveh različnih pisemskih ovojnicah, od katerih ena vsebuje opis značilnosti ponujenih gradbenih del/blaga/storitev (tehnična ponudba), v drugi pa je navedena cena (finančna ponudba).
The merits of the technical offers are evaluated against the technical criteria and given points up to the maximum laid down in the procurement documents. 
Prednosti tehničnih ponudb se ocenijo glede na tehnična merila in ponudbe se točkujejo do največjega mogočega števila točk, ki je določeno v razpisni dokumentaciji.
The financial offer is evaluated mathematically with the lowest acceptable bid receiving the highest points according to the weighting specified for each tender. 
Finančna ponudba se oceni matematično in najnižja sprejemljiva ponudba prejme največ točk po ponderiranju, ki se določi za vsak razpis.
The cumulative weighting always equals 100. 
Kumulativno ponderiranje je vedno enako 100.
In Italy, the financial offer is evaluated in terms of a discount granted on a pre-defined price, known as the ‘base price’, which is specified in the procurement documents. 
V Italiji se finančna ponudba oceni glede na popust, odobren na vnaprej določeno ceno, znano kot „osnovna cena“, ki je določena v razpisni dokumentaciji.
Thus, the price in the financial offer cannot be higher than the base price, but tends to be near the base price if a low weighting is given to it. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
Tako cena v finančni ponudbi ne more biti višja od osnovne cene, toda če je ponderirana nizko, ji je običajno podobna. Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
27 PRICE WAS A SECONDARY CRITERION FOR AWARDING CONTRACTS A VERY LOW WEIGHTING WAS GIVEN TO PRICE 42. 
27 CENA JE BILA PRI ODDAJI JAVNIH NAROČIL DRUGOTNEGA POMENA CENA JE BILA PONDERIRANA ZELO NIZKO 42.
In the case of best-value-for-money procurement procedures, the award criteria should be those best suited to the tender in question, and the weighting applied to the price in relation to the other criteria should not result in the neutralisation of the price in the choice of contractor36. 
V primerih postopkov, kjer se naročilo odda za ekonomsko najugodnejšo ponudbo, bi morala biti merila za dodeljevanje tista, ki so za zadevni javni razpis najustreznejša, ponderiranje cene glede na druga merila pa ne bi smelo privesti do nevtralizacije cene pri izbiri izvajalca36.
The supply and works contracts for the CASE project were awarded on the basis of the best-value-for-money criterion. 
Naročila blaga in gradbenih del za projekt CASE so bila dodeljena na podlagi merila ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe.
During the evaluation process, the tenderers were awarded points for the merits of their technical and financial offers and the weighting accorded to the financial offers varied from 25 to 55 points out of 100. 
Ponudniki so pri ocenjevanju dobili točke za prednosti svojih tehničnih in finančnih ponudb in ponderiranje za finančne ponudbe je bilo od 25 do 55 točk od stotih.
For the most important contract, the construction of buildings, the weighting accorded to the financial offer was 25/100, which was very low as it resulted in the neutralisation of the effect of price in the choice of contractor. 
Pri najpomembnejši pogodbi o oddaji javnega naročila, tisti o gradnji stavb, je bilo ponderiranje finančne ponudbe 25/100, kar je bilo zelo nizko, saj je povzročilo nevtralizacijo učinka cene pri izbiri izvajalca.
Despite the large number of admissible bids (see Table 8), in practice the weighting applied to price was so low that all prices were close to the base price and contracts were awarded at prices that were not lower than the average price offered by all bidders. 
Kljub velikemu številu sprejemljivih ponudb (glej tabelo 8) je bilo v praksi ponderiranje cene tako nizko, da so bile vse cene blizu osnovne cene, naročila pa so bila oddana po cenah, ki niso bile nižje od povprečne cene, ki so jo ponudili vsi ponudniki.
By comparison, for the supply of furniture, the weight of the financial offer was 40/100 and the competition was more based on price, i.e. the rebates offered were higher and the tendered prices more variable. 
V primerjavi s tem je bil ponder finančne ponudbe pri dobavi pohištva 40/100 in konkurenca je bolj temeljila na ceni, tj. ponujeni rabati so bili višji, ponujene cene pa bolj raznolike.
The awarding of the contracts for the buildings and the supply of furniture were influenced more by discretionary than by objectively verifiable criteria. 
Na oddajanje javnih naročil za stavbe in dobavo pohištva so bolj vplivala diskrecijska kot objektivno preverljiva merila.
For the buildings contracts, the most important award criteria within the technical offer was aesthetic/architectonic features of the buildings, which is per se a discretionary criterion, as there is no objectively verifiable indicator for it. 
Pri naročilih stavb so bila za tehnično ponudbo najpomembnejša merila za dodelitev estetske/ arhitektonske značilnosti stavb, kar je samo po sebi diskrecijsko merilo, saj zanj ni objektivno preverljivega kazalnika.
The tender notice defined this award criterion in a rather broad manner, thus giving the tender evaluation committee considerable discretionary power37. 
V obvestilu o razpisu je bilo to merilo za dodelitev opredeljeno dokaj ohlapno, kar je komisiji za ocenjevanje ponudb dalo veliko diskrecijsko moč37.
Best practices suggest, in such cases, giving additional information to justify the assigned scores. 
V takih primerih se po najboljših praksah predlaga navedbo dodatnih informacij za upravičenje dodeljenih ocen.
36 This good practice is expressed also in Article 138(3) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 
36 Ta dobra praksa je določena tudi v členu 138(3) Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št.
37 Guidelines issued by the AVCP (Autorità per la vigilanza sui contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture), the Italian supervisory authority on public procurements, envisage that the tender notice should detail all criteria and scores in such a way to provide the tender evaluation committee with extremely reduced discretionality margins — Autorità per la vigilanza sui contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture, Linee guida per l’applicazione del criterio dell’offerta economicamente più vantaggiosa negli appalti di servizi e forniture. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
37 Smernice, ki jih je izdal italijanski nadzorni organ za javno naročanje AVCP (Autorità per la vigilanza sui contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture – organ za nadzor javnih naročil gradenj, storitev in blaga), določajo, da bi moralo obvestilo o povabilu za zbiranje ponudb podrobno opisovati vsa merila in točkovanje na način, ki daje komisiji za ocenjevanje ponudb zelo zmanjšane diskrecijske možnosti. Linee guida per l’applicazione del criterio dell’offerta economicamente più vantaggiosa negli appalti di servizi e forniture (smernice za uporabo merila ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe pri naročilih storitev in blaga). Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
28 AWARD CRITERIA LED TO AN INCREASED COST PER SQUARE METRE 46. 
28 MERILA ZA DODELJEVANJE SO PRIVEDLA DO POVEČANIH STROŠKOV ZA KVADRATNI METER 46.
The award criteria and weightings used for procurement had as a consequence that, to win, the bidders offered more than the standard content, such as controlled mechanical ventilation38, solar shields or exclusive finishing materials. 
Zaradi meril za dodeljevanje in ponderjev, uporabljenih za javno naročanje, so ponudniki, da bi dobili naročilo, ponudili več od standardne gradnje, na primer nadzorovano mehansko prezračevanje38, sončne panele ali ekskluzivne zaključne gradbene materiale.
These devices, which may have increased comfort levels and may have contributed to better energy efficiency, increased the cost per square metre of the apartments and reduced the financial resources available for constructing more apartments to accommodate more people. 
Te stvari, ki so morda povečale raven udobja in prispevale k večji energetski učinkovitosti, so povečale stroške za kvadratni meter stanovanj in zmanjšale finančna sredstva, ki so bila na voljo za gradnjo več stanovanj za nastanitev več ljudi.
38 One of the four offers audited included such a device, which was claimed to be for ‘reaching an ideal micro-climate inside the apartments, which favours thermal and hygrometric wellness and natural air ionisation’. 
38 Ena od štirih revidiranih ponudb je vsebovala tako napravo, katere namen naj bi bil doseči idealno mikroklimo v stanovanjih, ki pripomore k termalnemu udobju, uravnavanju vlage in naravni ionizaciji zraka.
BOX 3 AWARD CRITERIA AND WEIGHTING FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF BUILDINGS For the construction of the CASE buildings, the Department of Civil Protection followed an open tender. 
OKVIR 3 MERILA ZA DODELJEVANJE IN PONDERIRANJE ZA JAVNO NAROČILO STAVB Služba civilne zaščite je pri gradnji stavb CASE uporabila odprti razpisni postopek.
The award criterion was the ‘best value for money’. 
Merilo za dodeljevanje je bila ekonomsko najugodnejša ponudba.
For the financial offer the weighting was 25 out of 100 points, and for the technical offer 75 out of 100 points. 
Ponder za finančno ponudbo je bil 25 od 100 točk, za tehnično pa 75 od 100 točk.
Within the technical offer, the weighting factors were the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f ) (g) (h) (i) architectonic quality of the buildings and external aspects: 15 points energy efficiency and quality of the equipment: 10 points improvement of the parameters for environmental sustainability: 10 points architectonic quality of the internal accommodations and the quality of their finishes: 10 points size of surface offered: 5 points number of people housed: 5 points flexibility and variability of design of the accommodation: 5 points flexibility of the buildings in relation to the specific platform length: 5 points construction time: 10 points. 
Ponderji pri tehnični ponudbi so bili: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f ) (g) (h) (i) arhitektonska kakovost stavb in zunanja zasnova: 15 točk energetska učinkovitost in kakovost opreme: 10 točk izboljšanje parametrov okoljske trajnosti: 10 točk arhitektonska kakovost notranje nastanitve in kakovost zaključnih gradbenih materialov: 10 točk velikost ponujene površine: 5 točk število nastanjenih: 5 točk prožnost in variabilnost zasnove nastanitve: 5 točk možnost prilagoditve stavb specifični dolžini plošče: 5 točk čas gradnje: 10 točk.
Under the post-earthquake circumstances, the criteria should have aimed, among other things, at maximising the number of people accommodated. 
Glede na popotresne okoliščine bi morala biti merila med drugim usmerjena v zagotavljanje nastanitve čim več ljudem, vendar so bila uporabljena merila, ki so bila primernejša za dolgoročne naložbe kot za specifično izredno stanje.
The criteria used, however, were more suitable for long-term investments than for the specific emergency situation, as they gave a high weighting to increasing the architectonic qualities and maximising energy efficiency, but a low weighting to the number of people accommodated and the habitable surface offered (see Box 3). 
Visoko so namreč ponderirala izboljšanje arhitektonskih značilnosti in čim večjo energetsko učinkovitost, nizko pa število nastanjenih ljudi in zagotovljeno bivalno površino (glej okvir 3).
As a result, the surface of the apartments actually procured was less than the average surface of the offers received. Furthermore, the number of people actually accommodated was less than the average number in the offers received. 
Zato je bila površina dejansko naročenih stanovanj manjša od povprečne površine iz prejetih ponudb, poleg tega pa je bilo število ljudi, ki so bili v njih nasta-njeni, manjše od povprečnega števila v prejetih ponudbah.
These factors contributed to an increase in the cost per square metre and per person accommodated. 
Ti dejavniki so prispevali k povečanju stroškov za kvadratni meter in nastanjeno osebo.
Furthermore, without the use of architectural criteria, the procurement would have resulted in savings of around 11 million euro39. 
Poleg tega bi bilo brez uporabe arhitekturnih meril pri javnem naročanju prihranjenih približno 11 milijonov EUR39.
DIRECT AGREEMENTS WERE USED FOR ADDITIONAL WORKS 48. 
ZA DODATNA GRADBENA DELA SO BILI UPORABLJENI NEPOSREDNI SPORAZUMI. 48.
In order to save time, new procurement procedures for additional works were avoided and direct deals were used instead. 
Pri dodatnih gradbenih delih so se, da bi pridobili na času, izognili novim postopkom za oddajo javnih naročil in namesto njih posle sklepali neposredno.
For example, the heating systems, which were not included in the original contracts, were purchased from the same contractors that constructed the buildings. 
Na primer ogrevalni sistemi, ki niso bili zajeti v prvotne pogodbe o oddaji javnega naročila, so bili kupljeni od izvajalcev, ki so zgradili stavbe.
In the addenda to the contracts the prices were calculated by applying the same low rebates from the base prices as were used for the buildings (see paragraph 44). 
V dopolnilih k pogodbam so bile cene izračunane ob uporabi enako nizkih rabatov na osnovne cene, kot so bili uporabljeni za stavbe (glej odstavek 44).
Because the building contracts were awarded on the basis of discretionary criteria (see paragraph 45), the prices paid for heating systems were higher than necessary40. 
Ker so bile pogodbe o oddaji javnega naročila za stavbe dodeljene na podlagi diskrecijskih meril (glej odstavek 45), so bili ogrevalni sistemi plačani po višjih cenah, kot bi bilo potrebno40.
Considerable differences were also observed for the construction of lift frames, which, for some buildings, cost 100 % more than for other build-ings41. 
Velike razlike so bile ugotovljene tudi pri gradnji jaškov dvigal, ki so v nekaterih stavbah stali 100 % več kot v drugih41.
The final cost of some buildings increased by more than 13 % because of these works and the total cost for the same kinds of additional works varied from less than 128 000 euro per building to more than 280 000 euro per building, i.e. from 6 % of the original cost of the building to more than 13 % (see Table 9). 
Končni stroški nekaterih stavb so se zaradi teh gradbenih del zvišali za več kot 13 %, skupni stroški nekaterih vrst dodatnih gradbenih del pa so znašali od manj kot 128 000 EUR na stavbo do več kot 280 000 EUR na stavbo, tj. od 6 % prvotnih stroškov za stavbo do več kot 13 % (glej tabelo 9).
Thus, the building which, according to the original contract, was 34 500 euro more expensive than the cheapest building, became almost 189 000 euro more expensive after the additional works. 
Tako je bila stavba, ki je bila v skladu s prvotno pogodbo o oddaji javnega naročila 34 500 EUR dražja od najcenejše stavbe, po dodatnih gradbenih delih dražja za skoraj 189 000 EUR.
39 Without the scores for the architectural criteria, the final ranking of the bids would have changed and the price for the construction of 185 buildings would have been 11 million euro cheaper. 
39 Brez točk, dodeljenih za arhitekturna merila, bi se končna uvrstitev ponudb spremenila in cena za gradnjo 185 stavb bi bila 11 milijonov EUR nižja.
40 Despite all selected buildings receiving very high scores for energy efficiency (thus heating needs should be similar), the cost for the most expensive heating system was almost 140 000 euro, whereas the cost for the cheapest one was 67 000 euro. 
40 Čeprav so vse izbrane stavbe dobile zelo veliko število točk za energetsko učinkovitost (zato bi morale biti potrebe po ogrevanju podobne), je najdražji ogrevalni sistem stal skoraj 140 000 EUR, najcenejši pa 67 000 EUR.
The cost for the two remaining buildings was 79 000 euro and 128 000 euro. 
Stroški za preostali stavbi so znašali 79 000 EUR in 128 000 EUR.
41 One of the sampled constructors installed two lift frames for each of his 22 buildings at a cost of almost 55 000 euro per frame, i.e. 110 000 euro per building, whereas two other constructors produced lift frames at a unit cost of 23 000 euro. 
41 Eden od izvajalcev v vzorcu je v vsako od svojih 22 stavb vgradil dva jaška dvigala, kar je stalo skoraj 55 000 EUR na jašek, tj. 110 000 EUR na stavbo, druga dva izvajalca pa sta izdelala jaške dvigala, pri katerih je bil strošek na enoto 23 000 EUR.
29 Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
29 Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov