natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Examples of eligibility errors (a) Overdeclaration of staff costs: In the case of an ESF project supporting professional training courses for pupils from secondary schools, the beneficiary incorrectly charged various indirect costs (staff salaries, insurance, fuel, telephone and depreciation) to the project. (b) Unjustified application of negotiated procedure: In the case of a CF project the procurement of services related to the administrative preparation and technical planning for an infrastructure project was carried out by negotiated procedure. 
Primeri napak v zvezi z upravičenostjo (a) Prijavljanjeprevisokihstroškovdela:priprojektuESSza podporo tečajev poklicnega usposabljanja dijakov srednjih šol je upravičenec projektu nepravilno pripisal različne posredne stroške (plače zaposlenih, zavarovanje, gorivo, telefon in amortizacijo). (b) Neupravičena uporaba postopka s pogajanji: v primeru projekta KS so bile storitve v zvezi z administrativno pripravo in tehničnim načrtovanjem infrastrukturnega projekta naročene s postopkom s pogajanji.
The Court’s audit showed however that the conditions which have to be in place so that a negotiated procedure can be used were not fulfilled. (c) Directawardofcontract:InthecaseofanERDFproject for the building of access roads and light constructions at the entrances of a national park, the beneficiary directly awarded works. 
Vendar je Sodišče pri reviziji ugotovilo, da pogoji, ki so potrebni za uporabo postopka s pogajanji, niso bili izpolnjeni. (c) Neposredna dodelitev pogodbe: pri projektu ESRR za izgradnjo dovoznih cest in postavitev razsvetljave na vhodih v nacionalni park, je upravičenec neposredno oddal naročila za dela.
In addition, this contractor also invoiced works which were not covered by the contract. 
Poleg tega je ta izvajalec zaračunal dela, ki niso bila del pogodbe.
Due to the absence of public procurement procedure, the Court considers that the payments related to this contract are irregular. (d) Unlawful use of award criteria: In the case of ten ERDF projects for the construction of roads those bidders offering a price equal or below the average were not differentiated, meaning that the competitive advantage of those offering the lowest prices was eliminated. 
Ker ni bilo postopka za oddajo javnega naročila, Sodišče meni, da plačila v zvezi s to pogodbo niso pravilna (d) Nezakonita uporaba meril za dodelitev: pri desetih projektih ESRR za gradnjo cest se ni razlikovalo med ponudniki, katerih ponujene cene so bile enake povprečju ali nižje od njega, kar je pomenilo, da ponudniki, katerih ponujene cene so bile najnižje, niso imeli konkurenčne prednosti.
This was detected by the programmes’ internal controls and corrections were made to offset the financial impact of this illegal procedure before expenditure was declared to the Commission. 
To je bilo odkrito z notranjimi kontrolami programov in izvedeni so bili popravki za izravnavo finančnega učinka tega nezakonitega postopka, preden so bili odhodki prijavljeni Komisiji.
Nevertheless, it resulted in contracts co-financed by ERDF being awarded to bidders who, in nine out of the 10 cases, had not submitted the offer that provided the best combination of price and quality. 
Kljub temu so bile pogodbe, ki jih je sofinanciral ESRR, dodeljene ponudnikom, ki v devetih od desetih primerov niso predložili ponudbe, ki bi bila najboljša kombinacija cene in kakovosti.
Examples of eligibility errors (a) The Commission will follow up this issue and ensure that the necessary correction is made. 
Primeri napak v zvezi z upravičenostjo (a) Komisija bo spremljala ta problem ter zagotovila, da bo opravljen ustrezen popravek.
The Commission will continue to encourage Member States to widen the use of flat-rate indirect costs, in order to avoid such errors. (b) The Commission notes that the value of the contract was above the threshold specified in the applicable EU Directive on public procurement. 
Še naprej bo spodbujala države članice k razširitvi uporabe pavšalnih posrednih stroškov, da bi preprečila tovrstne napake. (b) Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila vrednost naročila nad pragom, določenim v ustrezni direktivi EU o javnih naročilih.
The Commission agrees with the existence of error in this case. 
Komisija se v tem primeru strinja z obstojem napake.
The Member State has also agreed and will apply a financial correction according to Commission guidelines. (c) The Commission notes that the value of the contract was below the threshold specified in the applicable EU Directive on public procurement. 
Tudi država članica se strinja s to ugotovitvijo in bo izvedla finančni popravek v skladu s smernicami Komisije. (c) Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila vrednost naročila pod pragom, določenim v ustrezni direktivi EU o javnih naročilih.
The Commission agrees with the existence of error in this case and will apply a financial correction according to Commission guidelines. (d) The Commission notes that the value of contracts were all below the thresholds of the applicable EU Directives on public procurement. 
Komisija se v tem primeru strinja z obstojem napake in bo naložila finančni popravek v skladu s svojimi smernicami. (d) Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila vrednost vseh naročil pod pragi, določenimi v ustreznih direktivah EU o javnih naročilih.
The Commission also notes that in the eight ERDF cases affected by a quantifiable error the national authorities had already applied proportionate financial corrections before certifying the expenditure to the Commission. 
Komisija poleg tega opozarja, da so v osmih zadevah ESRR, na katere je vplivala količinsko opredeljiva napaka, nacionalni organi že uporabili sorazmerne finančne popravke, preden so odhodke potrdili Komisiji.
As a result, there is no negative financial impact on the EU budget. 
Zato to ni imelo negativnega finančnega učinka na proračun EU.
4.21. Thenon-respectofpublicprocurementrulesalone accounts for 43 % of all quantifiable errors and makes up for approximately three quarters of the estimated error rate. 
4.21 Samonespoštovanjepravilzaoddajojavneganaročila povzroči skoraj 43 % vseh količinsko opredeljivih napak in predstavlja približno tri četrtine ocenjene stopnje napak.
4.21. The Commission has recently initiated a retrospective evaluation of the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of the basis EU public procurement legislative framework. 
4.21 Komisija je nedavno začela retroaktivno oceno relevantnosti, uspešnosti in učinkovitosti temeljnega zakonodajnega okvira EU za javna naročila.
The evaluation will focus primarily on analysing the cost-effectiveness of public procurement procedures and rules. 
Ocena se bo osredotočila zlasti na analizo stroškovne učinkovitosti postopkov in pravil v zvezi z javnimi naročili.
The evaluation will also include a description of Member States’ implementation and administrative structure to implement public procurement policy, including EU legis­ lation in this area. 
Vključe­ vala bo tudi opis izvajanja in administrativne strukture za izvajanje politike javnih naročil v državah članicah, vključno z izvajanjem zakonodaje EU na tem področju.
The results of the evaluation will be finalised by summer 2011. 
Končni rezultati ocene bodo znani do poletja 2011.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 103 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S In addition, a Commission interservice task force is examining the most common public procurement issues arising in the context of implementation of cohesion projects. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 103 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Poleg tega projektna skupina služb Komisije proučuje najpogostejše težave v zvezi z javnimi naročili, ki se pojavljajo pri izvajanju kohezij­ skih projektov.
The Commission will continue training actions to Member State authorities on the correct application of public procurement rules. 
Komisija bo še naprej izvajala usposabljanje za organe držav članic o pravilni uporabi pravil v zvezi z javnimi naročili.
Where appropriate, the Commission will continue to audit the appli­ cation of the EU Directives on public procurement by carrying out its own enquiries in certain cases or by asking the Member States’ audit authorities to perform such enquiries on its behalf. 
Po potrebi bo Komisija še naprej revidirala uporabo direktiv EU o javnih naročilih, bodisi tako, da bo v nekaterih primerih sama opravila poizvedbe, ali pa bo zaprosila revizijske organe držav članic, da opravijo take poiz­ vedbe v njenem imenu.
The Commission also refers to its answer to paragraph 4.20. 
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoj odgovor na odstavek 4.20.
4.23. The Commission considers that for most of the remaining errors detected by the Court the national authorities did not have sufficient information to detect the errors when declaring the expen­ diture to the Commission. 
4.23 Komisija meni, da za večino preostalih napak, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, nacionalni organi niso imeli zadostnih informacij, da bi te napake lahko odkrili, ko so prijavili odhodke Komisiji.
4.22. 53%ofthepaymentsaffectedbyerrorcontained non-quantifiable errors and therefore are not included in the estimation of the error rate. 
4.22 53 % plačil, na katera so vplivale napake, je vsebovalo količinsko neopredeljive napake in zato niso vključena v oceno stopnje napak.
Most of them were other compliance errors, mainly related to shortcomings in tendering and contracting procedures. 4.23. 
Te napake so večinoma sodile med druge napake v zvezi s skladnostjo, povezane predvsem s pomanj­ kljivostmi v razpisnih postopkih in postopki oddaje javnega naročila.
For at least 30 % of the errors found by the Court in this year’s sample, sufficient information was available for the Member State authorities in charge of implementing the OPs to have detected and corrected the error prior to certifying the expenditure to the Commission. 
4.23 Vsaj za 30 % napak, ki jih je Sodišče odkrilo v vzorcu za to leto, so imeli pristojni organi držav članic za izvajanje operativnih programov na voljo dovolj informacij, da bi lahko napake odkrili in popravili, preden so odhodke potrdili Komi­ siji.
Systems related to the regularity of transactions Member States 4.25. The Court assessed the compliance of 16 management and control systems in 13 Member States with key provisions in the regulatory framework (see Annex 4.2(1)). 
Sistemi v zvezi s pravilnostjo transakcij Države članice 4.25 Sodišče je v 13 državah članicah ocenilo, ali je 16 upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov skladnih s ključnimi določbami ureditvenega okvira (glej Prilogo 4.2(1)).
4.26. The Court’s audit showed that for 11 of the 16 OPs audited, the verifications carried out by Managing Authorities were only partially compliant with the regulatory requirements. 
4.26 Revizija, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče, je pokazala, da so bili pregledi, ki so jih izvedli organi upravljanja, za 11 od 16 revidiranih programov samo delno skladni s predpisanimi zahtevami.
4.25. The Commission notes that according to the Court’s assessment all 16 systems are fully or partially compliant with regard to the key requirements tested. 
4.25 Komisija ugotavlja, da je v skladu z oceno Sodišča vseh 16 sistemov povsem ali delno skladnih glede na ključne zahteve, ki so bile preverjane.
4.26. The Commission shares the Court’s view that management verifications are key controls to prevent irregularities. 
4.26 Komisija se strinja z mnenjem Sodišča, da so upravni pregledi ključne kontrole za preprečevanje nepravilnosti.
They should be improved, particularly for some programmes, and the Commission will continue to pursue its efforts in this direction through advice, training actions and specific audits. 
Zlasti za nekatere programe bi jih bilo treba izboljšati, za kar si bo Komisija še naprej prizadevala, in sicer s svetovanjem, ukrepi usposabljanja in posebnimi revizijami.
FormostOPsaudited,theCourtobserveddelaysin the implementation of the approved national audit strategy. Most Audit Authorities did not undertake a sufficient number of audits of payments in time for the 2009 annual control report. 
Večina revizijskih organov ni izvedla dovolj revizij plačil, ki bi bile končane pravočasno, da bi jih lahko vključili v letno poročilo o kontroliranju za leto 2009.
4.28. TheCourtalsonotedsignificantdifferencesinthe extent to which systems-related audit work had been carried out by the end of 2009. 
4.28 Sodišče je opazilo tudi, da je bilo revizijsko delo v zvezi s sistemi do konca leta 2009 izvedeno v zelo različnem obsegu.
Several Member States did not perform any systems audits before expenditure was declared to the Commission (10). 4.29. 
Več držav članic ni izvedlo nobenih revizij sistemov, preden so bili odhodki prijavljeni Komisiji (10).
4.31. As in the previous year(12) the least satisfactory aspect in the audited systems concerns the reporting of corrections to the Commission (see Annex 4.2(2)). 
4.31 Tako kot v prejšnjem letu (12) je poročanje Komisiji o popravkih najmanj zadovoljiv vidik revidiranih sistemov (glej Prilogo 4.2(2)).
In some instances relevant information was not communicated to the Commission, in others it was not reliable or it had not been presented as foreseen in the instructions sent by the Commission. 
V nekaterih primerih relevantne informacije niso bile sporočene Komisiji, v drugih primerih pa niso bile zanesljive oziroma niso bile predstavljene po navodilih Komi­ sije.
This means that in these cases the Commission does not have reliable information on recoveries and with­ drawals implemented by Member States. 
To pomeni, da slednja v teh primerih nima zanesljivih informacij o izterjavah in umikih, ki jih izvedejo države članice.
Weaknesses in this respect were also noted by the Commission (13). _____________ (10) For most OPs audited the first expenditure was certified to the Commission only the second half of 2009. 
4.29 Komisija ugotavlja, da je v skladu z oceno Sodišča 14 od 16 revizijskih organov povsem skladnih glede na ključne zahteve, ki so bile preverjane. _____________ (10) Za večino revidiranih operativnih programov so bili prvi odhodki potrjeni Komisiji šele v drugi polovici leta 2009.
(11) The Court did not assess whether the Member States were effective in detecting errors. 
(11) Sodišče ni ocenilo, ali so bile države članice uspešne pri odkrivanju napak.
(12) See the 2008 Annual Report, paragraph 6.30. 
(12) Glej letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavek 6.30.
(13) COM(2010) 52, point 1.6. 
(13) COM(2010) 52, točka 1.6.
Although the reporting of corrections by the Member States is not entirely satisfactory, in some cases the Commission considers that the data for 2009 submitted to the Commission in the first half of 2010 are of much better quality. 
4.31 Čeprav poročanje držav članic o popravkih ni povsem zado­ voljivo, Komisija v nekaterih primerih meni, da je kakovost podatkov za leto 2009, predloženih Komisiji v prvi polovici leta 2010, mnogo boljša.
In the framework of its 2008 Action Plan the Commission has carried out audits of Member States’ systems for withdrawals and recoveries similar to those of the Court, in 19 Member States. 
V okviru svojega akcijskega načrta iz leta 2008 je Komisija v 19 državah članicah izvedla revizije njihovih sistemov za umike in izterjave, podobne revizijam Sodišča.
The remaining Member States will be audited in 2010. 
Preostale države članice bodo revidirane leta 2010.
For the 2007-2013 period, there is a standardised procedure for submission of recovery statements through the IT system SFC2007. 
Za obdobje 2007–2013 se uporablja standardiziran postopek za predložitev izjav o izterjavah prek informacijskega sistema SFC2007.
The Commission expects that this reporting procedure will improve the quality of information in its disposal. 
Komisija pričakuje, da bo ta postopek poročanja izboljšal kakovost informacij, ki so ji na voljo.
Member States are also required to distinguish corrections deriving from their own controls and those from EU audits. 
Države članice morajo poleg tega razli­ kovati popravke, ki izhajajo iz njihovih lastnih kontrol, od tistih, ki izhajajo iz revizij EU.
4.35. Atleast30%oftheerrorsfoundcouldandshould have been detected and corrected by the Member States before certifying expenditure to the Commission (see paragraph 4.23). 
4.35 Države članice bi lahko odkrile in popravile vsaj 30 % ugotovljenih napak in bi to tudi morale storiti, preden so odhodke potrdile Komisiji (glej odstavek 4.23).
4.36. Forthesystemsaudited,theCourtconcludesthat: (a) for 12 out of 16 OPs audited weaknesses were noted with regard to verifications carried out by Managing Authorities and/or systems audits undertaken by Audit Authorities. 
4.36 Sodišče je glede revidiranih sistemov prišlo do zaključka, da: (a) so bile za 12 od 16 revidiranih operativnih programov opažene slabosti glede pregledov, ki so jih izvedli organi upravljanja.
Overall the supervisory and control systems for the 2007-2013 programming period were at least partially in compliance with the audited key provisions of the regu­ latory framework (see paragraphs 4.25 to 4.29); and T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S The Commission welcomes the Court’s assessment in Annex 4.3 and point 1.28 which represents an improvement over previous years. 
Na splošno so bili nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 vsaj delno v skladu z revidiranimi ključnimi določbami ureditvenega okvira (glej odstavke 4.25 do 4.29) in O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Komisija je zadovoljna z oceno Sodišča v Prilogi 4.3 in točki 1.28, ki pomeni izboljšanje v primerjavi s preteklimi leti.
The Commission notes that the error rate is this year significantly lower compared to previous years and that the frequency of errors in the Court sample continues to decrease for the third consecutive year. 
4.34 Komisija ugotavlja, da je stopnja napak v primerjavi s preteklimi leti letos občutno nižja ter da se pogostost napak v vzorcu Sodišča zmanjšuje že tretje leto zapored.
The Commission considers that this gives a good indication on the effectiveness of the reinforced control provisions of the 2007-2013 regulatory framework, as well as the first impact of the 2008 Commission Action Plan to strengthen its supervisory role for structural actions. 
Komisija meni, da to jasno kaže na uspešnost okrepljenih določb glede nadzora v regulativnem okviru 2007–2013, pa tudi prve učinke akcijskega načrta Komisije iz leta 2008 za krepitev njene nadzorne vloge pri strukturnih ukrepih.
The Commission will continue its persistent efforts to bring the error rate down to lower levels. 
Komisija si bo še naprej vztrajno prizadevala za znižanje stopnje napak.
The Commission follows up all cases where weaknesses were identified in the management and control systems in order to ensure that they function effectively. 
4.35 Komisija spremlja vse primere, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene slabosti v upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemih, da bi zagotovila njihovo uspešno delovanje.
The Commission considers that for most of the remaining errors detected by the Court the national authorities did not have sufficient information to detect the errors when declaring the expenditure to the Commission. 
Komisija meni, da za večino preostalih napak, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, nacionalni organi niso imeli zadostnih informacij, da bi te napake lahko odkrili, ko so prijavili odhodke Komisiji.
4.36. (a) The Commission notes that according to the Court’s assessment all 16 systems audited are compliant or partially compliant, which is an encouraging result for the 2007-2013 programming period. 
4.36 (a) Komisija opozarja, da je v skladu z oceno Sodišča vseh 16 revidiranih sistemov skladnih ali delno skladnih, kar je spodbuden rezultat za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
The Commission refers also to its replies to paragraphs 4.26 and 4.29. 
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoje odgovore na odstavka 4.26 in 4.29.
EN 106 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S (b) the Member States’ systems for recording and correcting errors of which they were aware for the 2000-2006 programming period were effective. 
SL 106 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A (b) so bili sistemi držav članic za evidentiranje in popravljanje napak, ki so se jih države članice za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 zavedale, uspešni.
Systems for reporting recoveries and withdrawals were partially effective which means that the Commission does not always receive reliable information on these financial corrections from Member States (see paragraphs 4.30 and 4.31). 4.37. 
Sistemi za poročanje o izter­ javah in umikih so bili delno uspešni, kar pomeni, da Komisija od držav članic ne prejema vedno zanesljivih informacij o teh finančnih popravkih (glej odstavka 4.30 in 4.31).
TheCourtrecommendstheCommissionto: (a) encourage national authorities to rigorously apply the corrective mechanisms prior to certification of the expen­ diture to the Commission; (b) ensure that the substitution of ineligible with new expen­ diture (withdrawal) does not result in new irregular expen­ diture being declared by Member States; and (c) ensure, through its supervision, an effective functioning of the national management and control systems for the 2007-2013 programming period. 
4.37 Sodišče Komisiji priporoča, naj: (a) nacionalne organe spodbuja k strogi uporabi mehanizmov za izvajanje popravkov, preden odhodke potrdijo Komisiji; (b) zagotovi, da države članice pri zamenjavi neupravičenih odhodkov z novimi (umik) ne prijavijo novih nepravilnih odhodkov, in (c) s svojim nadzorom zagotovi uspešno delovanje nacionalnih upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
With regard to public procurement rules (see paragraph 4.21), the Court encourages the Commission to monitor closely the correct application of the EU Directives on public procurement in Member States. 
4.38 Glede pravil za oddajo javnega naročila (glej odstavek 4.21) Sodišče Komisijo spodbuja k pozornemu spremljanju pravilne uporabe direktiv EU o javnih naročilih v državah članicah.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S (b) The quality and completeness of data has been improving constantly due to Commission efforts under its 2008 Action Plan. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E (b) Zaradi prizadevanj Komisije v okviru njenega akcijskega načrta iz leta 2008 se kakovost in popolnost podatkov stalno izboljšuje.
The Commission will complete in 2010 its on-the-spot audits of Member States systems for recoveries and issue recom­ mendations for further improvement of the Member States reporting. 
Komisija bo v letu 2010 dokončala revizije sistemov držav članic za izterjave na kraju samem ter izdala priporočila za nadaljnje izboljšanje poročanja držav članic.
For the 2007-2013 period, the legislative framework has been reinforced and provides for a standardised submission of information, which will improve the quality of information the Commission has in its disposal. 
Zakonodajni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 je bil okrepljen in predvideva standardizirano predložitev podatkov, kar bo izboljšalo kakovost podatkov, ki so na voljo Komisiji.
The Commission also refer to its reply to paragraph 4.31. 
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoj odgovor na odstavek 4.31.
4.37. (a) The Commission refers to its actions to improve management verifications and the certification of expenditure to the Commission, under its Action Plan adopted in February 2008. 
4.37 (a) Komisija se sklicuje na svoje ukrepe za izboljšanje upravnih pregledov in potrjevanja odhodkov Komisiji, izvedene v okviru akcijskega načrta, sprejetega februarja 2008.