natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However the FP7 financial control model does not sufficiently take into account the risk of errors. 
Vendar pa model finančnega nadzora 7. OP premalo upošteva tveganje napak.
This means that low-risk FP7 beneficiaries are subject to too many controls (see paragraphs 67 to 83). 
To pomeni, da je kontrol upravičencev 7. OP z majhnim tveganjem preveč (glej odstavke 67 do 83).
V. The Court’s examination of the Risk Sharing Finance Facility and the joint technology initiatives showed that both instruments have met the needs for which they were created. 
V. Sodišče je pri preučitvi Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja in skupnih tehnoloških pobud ugotovilo, da sta oba instrumenta ustrezala namenu, za katerega sta bila ustvarjena.
They have been successful in attracting specific groups of beneficiaries such as SMEs. 
Uspešno sta pritegnila posebne skupine upravičencev, kot so MSP.
However the implementation of joint technology initiatives has suffered from an overly complex legal framework and the Commission has not sufficiently demonstrated that funding provided by the Risk Sharing Finance Facility leads to investments above the level that beneficiaries would have undertaken without public money (see paragraphs 84 to 97). 
Vendar je izvajanje skupnih tehnoloških pobud oviral preveč zapleten pravni okvir, Komisija pa ni prikazala dovolj dobro, da financiranje iz Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja vodi do naložb, ki so višje od tistih, ki bi jih upravičenci izvedli brez javnega denarja (glej odstavke 84 do 97).
On the basis of these observations, the Court makes a number of recommendations addressed mainly to the Commission (see paragraphs 98 to 103): (a) With regard to the rules for participation, the Commission should make further efforts to ensure that beneficiaries’ practices can be used in Horizon 2020 and manage FP7 in a more consistent manner. (b) To strengthen process management, the Commission should deploy IT tools which will integrate all functionalities and it should examine the imbalances in staff workload. (c) To reduce processing times, the Commission should make sure that the processes are automated and implemented consistently across its services. (d) The Commission should make its control activities before and after payment more risk-driven, so as to better focus its control effort. (e) The budgetary authorities and the Commission should bring the legal framework of the joint technology initiatives more into line with their staff complement. 
Na podlagi teh ugotovitev Sodišče daje številna priporočila, ki so namenjena predvsem Komisiji (glej odstavke 98 do 103): (a) v zvezi s pravili za udeležbo bi si morala Komisija dodatno prizadevati, da bi zagotovila, da je mogoče prakse upravičencev uporabiti v Obzorju 2020, in 7. OP dosledneje upravljati; (b) za okrepitev upravljanje procesa bi morala Komisija uporabljati orodja IT, ki bi vključevala vse funkcionalnosti, in preučiti neravnovesja pri delovni obremenitvi zaposlenih; (c) za skrajšanje časa obravnave bi morala Komisija poskrbeti za avtomatizacijo procesov in njihovo dosledno izvajanje v vseh službah; (d) zaradi osredotočenja svojih prizadevanj na področju nadzora bi morala Komisija poskrbeti, da bi njene nadzorne dejavnosti, ki se izvajajo pred plačili in po njih, bolj temeljile na tveganju; (e) proračunski organi in Komisija bi morali pravni okvir skupnih tehnoloških pobud bolj uskladiti s številom svojih delavcev.
To maximise the impact of the Risk Sharing Finance Facility, the Commission should improve its targeting of those beneficiaries which have limited access to finance. 9 Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Za kar največji učinek Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja bi morala Komisija izboljšati svoje usmerjanje na tiste upravičence, ki imajo omejen dostop do financiranja. 9 Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
10 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. 
10 UVOD SPLOŠNE INFORMACIJE 1.
The seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (FP7) represents one of the Union’s key instruments for funding research and is its contribution to the Europe 2020 strategy. 
Sedmi okvirni program za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (7. OP) je eden ključnih instrumentov Unije za financiranje raziskav in prispevek EU k strategiji Evropa 2020.
It aims to strengthen industrial competitiveness and to meet the research needs of other Union policies1 thereby contributing to the creation of a knowledge-based society, building on a European Research Area and complementing activities at national and regional level2. 2. 
Njegov namen je okrepiti konkurenčnost industrije in zadovoljiti raziskovalne potrebe na področju drugih politik Unije1 ter tako prispevati k oblikovanju družbe znanja z nadgradnjo evropskega raziskovalnega prostora in dopolnjevanjem dejavnosti na nacionalni in regionalni ravni.2 2.
FP7 is made up of several funding schemes grouped into four specific programmes (see Figure 1), which are designed to support research-related activities including basic and applied research and educational and innovation activities. 
OP sestavljajo številne sheme financiranja, ki so razvrščene v štiri posebne programe (glej sliko 1), zasnovane v podporo dejavnostim, povezanim z raziskavami, vključno s temeljnimi in uporabnimi raziskavami ter izobraževalnimi in inovacijskimi dejavnostmi.
FP7 provides more than 50 billion euro3 in support of these activities in the 2007–13 period. 
OP v obdobju od 2007 do 2013 te dejavnosti podpira z več kot 50 milijardami EUR3.
Most of the funds are spent on grants to final beneficiaries in the Member States as well as beyond the EU. 
Večina teh sredstev se porabi kot nepovratna sredstva, dodeljena končnim upravičencem v državah članicah in zunaj EU.
The activities to be funded by the grants are determined on the basis of competitive calls for proposals. 
Dejavnosti, ki se financirajo s temi sredstvi, se določijo na podlagi konkurenčnih razpisov za zbiranje predlogov.
The beneficiaries usually work as consortia of partners on the basis of grant agreements with the Commission. 
Upravičenci običajno delujejo kot partnerski konzorciji na osnovi sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev, sklenjenih s Komisijo.
1 Such as sustainable development, climate change, energy, transport, public health, information technologies and biotechnology. 
1 Kot so trajnostni razvoj, podnebne spremembe, energetika, prevoz, javno zdravje, informacijske tehnologije in biotehnologija.
1). 3 This amount does not include the FP7 Euratom budget, which will provide an additional 5,3 billion euro over the same period. 
1). 3 Ta znesek ne vključuje proračuna 7. OP Euratom, ki bo v istem obdobju zagotovil dodatne 5,3 milijarde EUR.
FIGURE 1 FP7 BUDGET 2007–13 (IN BILLION EURO) Environment 1,9 Space 1,4 Security 1,4 RSFF 1,0 Socio-economic sciences and the humanities 0,6 Agriculture and biotechnology (KBBE) 1,9 Energy 2,4 Nanosciences and technologies (NMP) 3,5 Transport 4,2 Joint technology initiatives 3,1 Note: Dashed border lines indicate instruments which were newly introduced in FP7. 
SLIKA 1 PRORAČUN 7. OP 2007–2013 (V MILIJARDAH EUR) Kmetijstvo in biotehnologija (KBBE) 1,9 Energetika 2,4 Nanoznanosti in tehnologije (NMP) 3,5 Skupne tehnološke pobude 3,1 Okolje 1,9 Vesolje 1,4 Sodelovanje 32,4 Varnost 1,4 RSFF 1,0 Družbeno-ekonomske in humanistične znanosti 0,6 Skupaj 50,5 Zmogljivosti 4,1 Zamisli 7,4 Promet 4,2 Zdravje 6,1 Ljudje 4,8 Skupno raziskovalno središče* 1,7 Informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije 9,1 Opomba: S črtkano obrobo so označeni na novo uvedeni instrumenti v 7.
Capacities 4,1 Ideas 7,4 Cooperation 32,4 Health 6,1 People 4,8 TOTAL 50,5 JRC* 1,7 Information and communication technologies 9,1 * A dedicated specific programme supports the non-nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre, which is a directorate-general directly carrying out research activities for the Commission. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
OP. * Posebej temu namenjen posebni program podpira nejedrske dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča oz. generalnega direktorata, ki izvaja raziskovalne dejavnosti neposredno za Komisijo. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
FP7 is a complex programme for funding research. 
OP je kompleksen program za financiranje raziskav.
Its annual budget increases year-on-year and is expected to approach 11 billion euro in 2013. 
Njegov letni proračun se vsako leto poveča in naj bi se v letu 2013 približal 11 milijar-dam EUR.
This, together with the distinctive characteristics of FP7 (see Box 1), makes it one of the largest single research programmes in the world. 
Zaradi tega in zaradi svojih značilnosti (glej okvir 1) je eden največjih izključno raziskavam namenjenih programov na svetu.
These characteristics have a direct impact on the way FP7 has to be managed. 
Te značilnosti imajo neposreden vpliv na način, kako je treba upravljati 7. OP.
For instance, due to the transnational nature of FP7 and the combination of academic and industrial entities in individual projects, participants within the same consortium may be subject to different tax, legal, accounting or financial rules. 
Na primer, zaradi nadnacionalne narave 7. OP in povezovanja akademskih in industrijskih subjektov pri posameznih projektih lahko za udeležence istega konzorcija veljajo različna davčna, pravna, računovodska ali finančna pravila.
The FP7 rules thus have to be sufficiently flexible to accommodate these differences and at the same time be precise enough to avoid misinterpretations. 
OP dovolj prožna, da zajamejo te razlike, istočasno pa morajo biti dovolj natančna, da ne pride do napačnih razlag.
The rules of the national research funding schemes only need to take into account relevant national legislation. 
Pravila nacionalnih shem za financiranje raziskav morajo upoštevati samo ustrezno nacionalno zakonodajo.
11 BOX 1 CHARACTERISTICS OF FP7 FP7 serves beneficiaries from all EU Member States, associated and accession countries (144) as well as international cooperation partner countries. 
OP je namenjen upravičencem iz vseh držav članic EU, pridruženih držav in držav pristopnic (144), pa tudi držav partneric v mednarodnem sodelovanju.
It is managed by 19 independent entities: eight Commission services (six directorates-general and two executive agencies), the European Investment Bank, five joint technology initiatives and five Article 185 initiatives5. 
Upravlja ga 19 neodvisnih subjektov: osem služb Komisije (šest generalnih direktoratov in dve izvajalski agenciji), Evropska investicijska banka, pet skupnih tehnoloških pobud in pet pobud iz člena 1855.
In the eight Commission services, more than 2 500 staff members are employed to implement FP7. The average EU contribution per project is 1,75 million euro. 
V osmih službah Komisije je za izvajanje 7. OP zaposlenih več kot 2500 uslužbencev. Povprečni prispevek EU na projekt je 1,75 milijona EUR.
A typical project involves transnational collaboration between five or six participants. 
Tipičen projekt vključuje nadnacionalno sodelovanje med petimi ali šestimi udeleženci.
For collaborative projects, which represent around two thirds of the FP7 budget, the average number of participants is 11. 
Pri projektih sodelovanja, za katere se porabita približno dve tretjini proračuna 7.
The consortia in most projects are made up of participants from both the academic world and the private sector. 
Konzorcije v večini projektov sestavljajo udeleženci tako iz akademskih krogov kot iz zasebnega sektorja.
Every year, around 15 000 proposals are evaluated, 2 500 new grant agreements are concluded and around 10 000 payments are made. 
Vsako leto je ocenjenih približno 15 000 predlogov, sklenjenih je 2 500 novih sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev in izvedenih je približno 10 000 plačil.
The FP7 portfolio consists of around 14 000 grant agreements (2011 figures). 
OP obsega približno 14 000 sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev (v letu 2011).
4 Switzerland, Israel, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Turkey, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Albania, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Faeroe Islands and Moldova. 
4 Švica, Izrael, Norveška, Islandija, Lihtenštajn, Turčija, Hrvaška, Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija, Srbija, Albanija, Črna gora, Bosna in Hercegovina, Ferski otoki in Moldavija.
5 Initiatives under Article 185 TFEU (Article 185 initiatives) allow the EU to provide support to the joint implementation of research and development programmes of the Member States. 
5 Pobude v skladu s členom 185 PDEU (pobude iz člena 185) omogočajo EU, da zagotavlja podporo skupnemu izvajanju raziskovalnih in razvojnih programov držav članic.
The implementation is managed by dedicated implementation structures. 
Izvajanje upravljajo temu namenjene izvajalske strukture.
Source: Fifth FP7 monitoring report, 2012 general budget of the EU and Commission communication on simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes (COM(2010) 187). 
Vir: Peto poročilo o spremljanju 7. OP, splošni proračun EU za leto 2012 in sporočilo Komisije o poenostavitvi izvajanja okvirnih raziskovalnih programov (COM(2010)187).
FP7 has introduced a number of new instruments compared to FP6. 
OP je uvedel številne nove instrumente v primerjavi s 6.
The most important ones are support for frontier research6, joint technology initiatives (JTIs) and the Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF). 
Najbolj pomembni so podpora pionirskim raziskavam6, skupne tehnološke pobude (JTI) in Sklad za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja (RSFF).
Support for frontier research was introduced to fund basic ‘blue-sky’ research7, whereas the other two instruments were conceived to support close-to-the-market innovation activities with the aim of fostering industry participation, which has steadily decreased since FP48. 
Podpora za pionirske raziskave je bila uvedena za financiranje temeljnih teoretičnih raziskav7, ostala dva instrumenta pa sta bila zasnovana za podpiranje inovacijskih dejavnosti, ki so blizu trgu, da bi se okrepila udeležba industrije, ki se od 4.
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT 6. The objectives and activities to be financed under FP7 are defined in Decision No 1982/2006/EC and the decisions on four specific programmes. 
Cilji in dejavnosti, ki se bodo financirali v okviru 7. OP, so opredeljeni v Sklepu št. 1982/2006/ES in sklepih o štirih posebnih programih.
The FP7 regulation9 sets out the rules for participation. 
OP9 določa pravila za udeležbo.
This framework is complemented by the implementing rules adopted by the Commission and non-binding guidance documents (hereafter the term ‘rules for participation’ will refer to the hierarchical structure in Figure 2). 
Ta okvir dopolnjujejo izvedbena pravila, ki jih je sprejela Komisija, in nezavezujoče smernice (v nadaljevanju se bo izraz „pravila za udeležbo“ nanašal na hierarhično strukturo na sliki 2).
The rules for participation define the conditions for project selection, participation of entities in the projects and financing of projects. 
Pravila za udeležbo določajo pogoje za izbiro projektov, udeležbo subjektov v projektih in financiranje projektov.
The current rules for participation are the result of the experience accumulated over 20 years of previous framework programmes. 
Sedanja pravila za udeležbo so rezultat izkušenj, pridobljenih v 20-letnem obdobju predhodnih okvirnih programov.
Simplification became the main driving force under FP610 and has been a commitment for the Commission under FP711. 
Poenostavitev je postala glavna gonilna sila v 6. OP10, v 7.
6 Funded through the Ideas Specific Programme, which is implemented by the European Research Council and its executive agency. 
6 Financira se prek posebnega programa „Zamisli“, ki ga izvajata Evropski raziskovalni svet in njegova izvajalska agencija.
7 The term ‘blue sky’ or ‘frontier’ research denotes research in science and technology beyond the frontiers of understanding, progressing on new areas, and is characterised by an absence of disciplinary boundaries. 
7 Izraz „teoretične“ ali „pionirske“ raziskave označuje znanstvene in tehnološke raziskave, ki presegajo meje vedenja in se širijo na nova področja, meje med disciplinami pa so zabrisane.
8 From 39 % in FP4 to 31 % in FP6. 
8 Z 39 % v 4. OP na 31 % v 6.
Source: 'Interim evaluation of the seventh framework programme — Report of the Expert Group', 12 November 2012. 
OP. Vir: Vmesna ocena Sedmega okvirnega programa – poročilo strokovne skupine, 12. november 2012.
9 Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 laying down the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the Seventh Framework Programme and for the dissemination of research results (2007-2013) (OJ L 391, 30.12.2006, p. 1). 
1906/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o določitvi pravil za udeležbo podjetij, raziskovalnih središč in univerz pri ukrepih v okviru Sedmega okvirnega programa in razširjanju rezultatov raziskav (2007–2013) (UL L 391, 30.12.2006, str. 1).
10 For instance, the delegation of management to coordinators and the use of audit certificates or simplification of Marie Curie actions. 
10 Na primer, prenos upravljanja na koordinatorje, uporaba revizijskih potrdil ali poenostavitev ukrepov Marie Curie.
The Marie Curie actions are now part of the People Specific Programme. 
Ukrepi Marie Curie so sedaj del posebnega programa „Ljudje“.
FIGURE 2 HIERARCHY OF FP7 RULES FOR PARTICIPATION Legal basis Legal documents for implementation 13 Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 Laying down the rules for participation Model grant agreements: i.e. Standard/ERC/REA Rules for submission of proposals, evaluation and selection Rules on verification of existence, legal status, operat. and financial capacity Decision C(2011) 174 final: On three measures for simplifying (Dec. 1982/2006/EC) Guide to Financial Issues Guide to EU funding for Research & Innovation Checklist for Consortium Agreement Amendments Guide for FP7 Grant Agreements Source: European Court of Auditors, CORDIS. 
SLIKA 2 HIERARHIJA PRAVIL 7. OP ZA UDELEŽBO Pravna podlaga Izvedbeni pravni dokumenti 13 Uredba (ES) št. 1906/2006 o določitvi pravil za udeležbo Vzorci sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev: npr. standardni/ERC/REA Pravila za predložitev predlogov, ocenjevanje in izbiro Pravila za preverjanje obstoja, pravnega statusa, posl. in fin. sposobnosti Sklep C (2011) 174 final: o treh ukrepih za poenostavitev (Sklep 1982/2006/ES) Smernice Vodič po finančnih zadevah Vodič po financiranju EU za raziskave in inovacije Kontrolni seznam za konzorcijski sporazum Vodič po spremembah za sporazume o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev 7.
Guidance notes on Project Reporting Guide to Intellectual Property Rights Guide on Project Technical Review Guide to Flat-rate Subsistence Guidance documents Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
OP Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče, CORDIS. Navodila za poročanje o projektih Vodič po pravicah intelektualne lastnine Navodila za tehnični pregled projekta Vodič po pavšalnih dnevnicah Posebno poročilo št.
DG EAC/REA 10 % REA (SMEs) 3% Indirect management 42 % Direct management 58 % ERCEA 15 % 14 IMPLEMENTATION 9. 
GD EAC/REA 10 % REA (MSP) 3% Posredno upravljanje 42 % Neposredno upravljanje 58 % ERCEA 15 % 14 IZVAJANJE 9.
The implementation of 58 % of FP7 by value falls under centralised direct management12 by six directorates-general. For the remainder implementation has been delegated to two executive agencies (the Research Executive Agency (REA) and European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA)), the EIB, the JTIs and dedicated implementation structures for Article 185 initiatives. 
OP (po vrednosti) izvaja šest generalnih direktoratov po načelu neposrednega centraliziranega upravljanja.12 Za preostali del je bilo izvajanje preneseno na dve izvajalski agenciji (Izvajalsko agencijo za raziskave (REA) in Izvajalsko agencijo Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta (ERCEA)), EIB, skupne tehnološke pobude in posebne izvajalske strukture za pobude iz člena 185.
While the executive agencies follow the same procedures as the Commission, the other entities can organise their internal processes differently. 
Medtem ko izvajalske agencije uporabljajo enake postopke kot Komisija, lahko drugi organi svoje notranje postopke organizirajo drugače.
A breakdown by management mode and entities responsible is provided in Figure 3. 
Slika 3 prikazuje razčlenitev po načinu upravljanja in odgovornih subjektih.
12 Under centralised management, the budget is implemented either directly by the Commission or indirectly by the agencies or other bodies to which the Commission has delegated its powers. 
12 Pri centraliziranem upravljanju izvršuje proračun bodisi neposredno Komisija ali posredno agencije ali drugi organi, na katere je Komisija prenesla svoja pooblastila.
FIGURE 3 ENTITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION DG ENT/REA 6 % DG ENER and DG MOVE 1% DG CNECT 17 % JTIs 6 % EIB (RSFF) 2 % Article 185 1% DG RTD 39 % Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
SLIKA 3 SUBJEKTI, KI SO ODGOVORNI ZA IZVAJANJE GD ENTR/REA 6 % GD ENER in GD MOVE 1% GD CNECT 17 % Skupne tehnološke pobude 6 % EIB (RSFF) 2 % Člen 185 1% GD RTD 39 % Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
Regardless of the implementing entity, grant implementation is typically accomplished by means of the following three main processes: (a) identification of the scientific topics to be supported and setting out the work programmes for their implementation; (b) project selection, typically based on a competitive selection process, and negotiation with successful applicants; and (c) control of the scientific implementation of projects and reimbursement of the beneficiaries for their eligible costs. 
Ne glede na izvajalski subjekt se nepovratna sredstva običajno dodelijo v okviru naslednjih treh glavnih procesov: (a) opredelitev znanstvenih tem, ki se bodo podpirale, in določitev delovnih programov za njihovo izvajanje; (b) izbira projektov, običajno na podlagi konkurenčnega postopka izbire, in pogajanja z uspešnimi prosilci; in (c) nadzor znanstvenega izvajanja projektov in povračilo upravičenih stroškov upravičencem.
Simplification under FP7 has not only concerned the rules, but also the internal processes of the DGs and executive agencies. 
Poenostavitev v okviru 7. OP se ne nanaša samo na pravila, ampak tudi na notranje postopke generalnih direktoratov in izvajalskih agencij.
Since the Court’s last audit in this field13 in 2004, the Commission has introduced several new systems designed to simplify the grant implementation processes (e.g. participant portal, unique registration facility, negotiation facility). 
Komisija je od zadnje revizije na tem področju13, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče leta 2004, uvedla več novih sistemov za poenostavitev postopkov izvajanja dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev (npr. portal za udeležence, centralni sistem prijave, mehanizem za pogajanja).
NEW INSTRUMENTS UNDER FP7 12. 
NOVI INSTRUMENTI V OKVIRU 7. OP 12.
The JTIs are long-term public–private partnerships. 
Skupne tehnološke pobude so dolgoročna javno-zasebna partnerstva.
They combine private-sector investment with EU and national public funding. 
Združujejo naložbe zasebnega sektorja s financiranjem EU in nacionalnim javnim financiranjem.
They aim to support cooperative research across Europe in fields of industrial research where there are clearly identified common technological and economic objectives. 
Njihov namen je podpirati sodelovanje pri raziskavah po Evropi na področjih industrijskih raziskav z jasno opredeljenimi skupnimi tehnološkimi in gospodarskimi cilji.