natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regarding objectives and indicators, the ex post evaluation of Interreg I drew attention to: (a) the need to clarify the purpose of cooperation, since Interreg programmes pursue the same objectives as traditional programmes. However, the latter can call on far more generous financial resources, and the eligible regions are not all affected by development difficulties; (b) the absence of clear, quantified initial objectives; (c) the need to establish relevant indicators. 
V zvezi s cilji in kazalniki je naknadna ocena pobude Interreg I že opozorila na: (a) potrebo po razjasnitvi namena sodelovanja, saj si programi Interreg prizadevajo doseči iste cilje kot klasični programi, pri čemer pa imajo slednji na razpolago veliko več finančnih sredstev, vse regije, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za pridobitev pomoči, pa se tudi ne spopadajo z razvojnimi težavami; (b) pomanjkanje jasnih in kvantificiranih ciljev; (c) potrebo po uvedbi ustreznih kazalnikov.
In anticipation of a Parliament opinion on the Interreg III guidelines, the Commission prepared a brief information paper consisting of an initial review of Interreg II (4). 
Komisija je v pričakovanju mnenja Parlamenta o smernicah Interreg III pripravila kratek informativni dokument, ki je vseboval prvo poročilo o pobudi Interreg II (4).
However, this document is very general and focuses on matters of implementation. 
Vendar je dokument zelo splošen in obravnava vprašanja izvajanja.
Usually, despite the studies referred to in paragraph 15 and the results of the Interreg II interim evaluation, no analysis of the specific situation of eligible areas or information concerning the progress made towards attaining the CI objectives or the specific CIP objectives under either Interreg I or Interreg II (4) ÔCommunity Initiative Interreg II 1994-1999: an initial evaluationŐ, January 2000, European Union Ń regional policy. 7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/9 was available to the Commission. 
Kljub raziskavam iz odstavka 15 in rezultatom vmesne ocene programov pobude Skupnosti Komisija na splošno ni imela na voljo posebne analize o območjih, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, niti informacij o (4) „Pobuda Skupnosti Interreg II 1994–1999: prvo poročilo“, januar 2000, Evropska unija – Regionalna politika. 7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/9 napredku pri doseganju ciljev pobude ali specifičnih ciljev programov pobude Skupnosti, naj gre za Interreg I ali Interreg II .
Objectives and indicators 19. 
Cilji in kazalniki 19.
In the Interreg III guidelines, each Strand has many far-reaching specific objectives (see Table 3). 
V smernicah Interreg III ima vsaka usmeritev obsežne specifične cilje (glej tabelo 3).
The guidelines also state, in the light of the general guidelines of the SFs and Community policy, that preference will be given to employment, competitiveness, sustainable development and the promotion of equal opportunities for women and men. 
Poleg tega je v njih predvideno, da bodo imeli ob upoštevanju splošnih smernic strukturnih skladov in politik Skupnosti prednost zaposlovanje, konkurenčnost, trajnostni razvoj ter spodbujanje enakih možnosti žensk in moških.
The Commission has entrusted the authorities responsible for CIPs in the Member States with the task of setting concrete objectives on the basis of an analysis of the problems facing border areas. 
Komisija je organe držav članic, pristojne za programe pobude Skupnosti, zadolžila, da na podlagi analize težav, povezanih z mejami, določijo konkretne cilje.
It has established operational rules (see paragraphs 7,15 and 16) but no specific measurable objectives. 
Čeprav je opredelila pravila delovanja (glej odstavke 7 in 15–16), pa ni določila nobenih specifičnih in merljivih ciljev.
It is therefore especially important that, when examining the Member StatesŐ programme proposals, it should ensure that substantiated, targeted choices have been made. 
Zato je med preverjanjem predlogov programov držav članic izredno pomembno zagotoviti, da so bile sprejete utemeljene in ciljno naravnane odločitve.
The documents produced in order to guide the authorities preparing CIPs through the ex ante evaluation and the selection of indicators specific to Interreg (1) should have focused above all on key ideas translating the CommissionŐs priorities, with a view in particular to the ex post evaluation. 
Dokumenti, ki naj bi tem organom pomagali pri pripravi programov pobude Skupnosti na področju predhodne ocene in kazalnikov, značilnih za pobudo Interreg (1), bi se morali predvsem osredotočiti na ključne zamisli, ki uresničujejo prednostne naloge Komisije, zlasti v pričakovanju naknadne ocene.
With this in mind, and on the basis of the experience acquired during the two previous generations of the CI, it would have been helpful, say, to devise a minimum common system of indicators that could be applied to all programmes under the same strand. 
Na tej podlagi in na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih med dvema prejšnjima generacijama pobude Skupnosti, bi bilo tako koristno določiti sistem skupnih minimalnih kazalnikov, ki bi se uporabljali za vse programe v okviru iste usmeritve.
Instead, the documents: (a) emphasise above all the difficulties of making an ex ante evaluation, defining priorities for action and measuring programme impact. They are not really suited to the task of setting up a system with which to assess the impact of CIPs; (b) maintain a certain degree of confusion as regards indicators: while advocating that the indicators be limited in number, they refer successively to indicators of context, impact, cooperation/integration, output and result, as well as to key indicators, and recommend the use of qualitative indicators. 
Dejansko pa ti dokumenti: (a) zlasti poudarjajo težave pri izvedbi predhodne ocene, opredelitvi prednostnih nalog ukrepanja in merjenju vpliva programov; niso ravno koristni za vzpostavitev sistema, ki bi omogočal presojo vplivov programov pobude Skupnosti; (b) ustvarjajo določeno zmedo na področju kazalnikov; medtem ko priporočajo, da se določi omejeno število kazalnikov, se nato nanašajo na kazalnike konteksta, vpliva, sodelovanja/vključevanja, učinka in rezultata ter ključne kazalnike in priporočajo uporabo kvalitativnih kazalnikov; navedeni so primeri kazalnikov učinka, rezultata in vpliva; prav tako obstaja določena nenatančnost glede definicije teh različnih kategorij, zlasti med kazalniki učinka in rezultata, saj se število udeležencev v teh projektih na primer včasih obravnava kot kazalnik rezultata; (1) Gre za delovni dokument št.
Moreover, the definition of these separate categories is somewhat unclear, in particular as regards output and result indicators: the number of project participants, for example, is seen at times as a result indicator; (1) ÔWorking paper 6 (5 May 2000) Ń Ex ante evaluation and indicators (Strand A)Ő Ń and working paper 7 (October 2000), which expands the content of working paper 6 to include Strand B. The ex ante evaluation should seek in particular to assess the consistency of the strategy and the designated objectives, account being taken of the strengths and weaknesses identified. (c) fail to address Strand C, for which it was decided to define indicators in the course of implementation, since the Commission conceived of this Strand as a framework for cooperation without precise knowledge of the specific needs and corresponding objectives (see paragraph 24). 
6 (5. maj 2000) „Predhodna ocena in kazalniki za Interreg (Usmeritev A)“ in delovni dokument št. 7 (oktober 2000), ki povzema vsebino prejšnjega dokumenta in ga dopolnjuje z usmeritvijo B. Predhodna ocena bi morala zlasti oceniti skladnost strategije in postavljenih ciljev ob upoštevanju ugotovljenih prednosti in pomanjkljivosti. (c) ne zajemajo usmeritve C, za katero je bilo dogovorjeno, da bodo kazalniki določeni med izvajanjem, saj je Komisija to usmeritev oblikovala kot okvir sodelovanja, ne da bi natančno poznala posebne potrebe in ustrezne cilje (glej odstavek 24); čeprav projekte medregionalnega sodelovanja od leta 1995 naprej podpira ESRR, Komisija pri pripravi smernic za usmeritev C ni imela na voljo nobenih ocen v zvezi z njimi.
Targeting of measures 22. 
Ciljno naravnani ukrepi 22.
Where the InitiativeŐs Strand A is concerned, the Commission guidelines contain a list of purely discretionary measures. 
Smernice Komisije v zvezi z usmeritvijo A pobude vsebujejo samo seznam okvirnih ukrepov.
The Member States have the option of setting up programmes that are very broad in scope. 
Komisija je državam članicam pustila možnost, da določijo programe z zelo obsežnim področjem uporabe.
While, along the lines of the intervention programmes run under Objectives 1 and 2, these may include economic, social, cultural and environmental measures, their implementation is subject to special conditions that aim at strengthening cross-border cooperation. 
Po zgledu programov pomoči v okviru ciljev 1 in 2 lahko vključijo ekonomske, socialne, kulturne in okoljske ukrepe, vendar zanje veljajo posebni pogoji izvajanja, ki naj bi okrepili čezmejno sodelovanje.
Given these considerations, there is all the more reason (see paragraph 20) for the Commission to ensure, when examining the Member StatesŐ programme proposals, that measures are targeted (see paragraphs 59 to 63). 
Ti elementi so še dodaten razlog (glej odstavek 20), da mora Komisija pri preverjanju predlogov programov držav članic zagotoviti ciljno naravnanost ukrepov (glej odstavke 59–63).
As regards Strand B, the guidelines call for attention to be given to the CommunityŐs policy priorities, and above all to the trans-European networks and the territorial development recommendations contained in the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP Ń see glossary). 
Smernice v zvezi z usmeritvijo B predvidevajo upoštevanje prednostnih nalog politik Skupnosti, zlasti transevropska omrežja in priporočila za ozemeljski razvoj, izražena v „Evropski perspektivi prostorskega razvoja“ (EPPR) (glej glosar).
This Strand thus gains a certain degree of specificity, although, since it applies to a vast spatial area and enjoys limited financial resources, choices have to be made concerning the possibilities for intervention. 
To daje tej usmeritvi poseben značaj, čeprav je zadevno ozemlje obsežno in so finančna sredstva omejena, zaradi česar je treba izbirati med možnostmi za pomoč.
Where Strand C is concerned, the CommissionŐs initial guidelines outline a single general objective, namely, to improve the effectiveness of policies and instruments for regional development and cohesion (see Table 3). 
Prvotne smernice Komisije v zvezi z usmeritvijo C izražajo samo en splošni cilj, in sicer izboljšanje učinkovitosti politik in instrumentov za regionalni razvoj in kohezijo (glej tabelo 3).
A second communication published on 15 May 2001 delimitated the content of cooperation by identifying five themes for interregional cooperation (2), among them a heading of ÔOther subjectsŐ. 
V drugem sporočilu, objavljenem 15. maja 2001, je bila določena vsebina in opredeljenih pet tematskih področij medregionalnega sodelovanja (2), med katerimi je bila rubrika „drugo“.
Since the implementation of Strand C CIPs began, this last theme has attracted the majority of aid applications and agreements, which underlines the fact that, as a whole, this Strand is too broad. 
Od začetka izvajanja programov pobude Skupnosti v okviru te usmeritve je tematsko področje „drugo“ pritegnilo večino zahtevkov za pomoč in odobrenih prispevkov, kar kaže, da je ta usmeritev preobsežna.
(2) ÔActivitiessupportedunderObjective1and2oftheStructuralFundsŐ, ÔInterregional cooperation linking public authorities or equivalent bodies involved in other Interreg programmesŐ, ÔInterregional cooperation in the field of urban developmentŐ, ÔInterregional cooperation linking regions involved under one or several of the three themes of the regional innovative actions for 2000 to 2006Ő and ÔOther subjects appropriate to interregional cooperationŐ. 
(2) „Podprte dejavnosti v okviru ciljev 1 in 2 strukturnih skladov“, „Medregionalno sodelovanje, ki povezuje javne oblasti in enakovredne organe, ki sodelujejo v drugih programih Interreg“, „Medregionalno sodelovanje na področju urbanističnega razvoja“, „Medregionalno sodelovanje, ki povezuje regije, ki sodelujejo na enem ali več tematskih področjih inovativnih regijskih ukrepov, za obdobje 2000–2006“ in „Druga ustrezna tematska področja za medregionalno sodelovanje“.
C 303/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 25. 
C 303/10 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 25.
In conclusion, the objectives that appear in the Commission guidelines can be described as general. 
Končni sklep je, da so cilji, ki jih je Komisija ohranila v svojih smernicah, splošni.
Moreover, the working documents that are made available do not offer sufficient support to project managers setting up suitable operational indicators for assessing how well the objectives have been attained. 
Poleg tega delovni dokumenti, ki so na voljo, vodij projektov ne spodbujajo zadosti, da bi uvedli operativne in ustrezne kazalnike, s katerimi bi ocenili, kako so bili izpolnjeni cilji.
Eligible measures are therefore heterogeneous and result in a wide disparity of projects. 
Tako so upravičeni ukrepi različni in povzročajo veliko neenakost projektov.
Yet one of the key principles for the effectiveness of SF intervention is the concentration of assistance. 
Eno glavnih načel za zagotavljanje učinkovitosti programov pomoči strukturnih skladov je tako združevanje pomoči.
When implementing CIPs, unless they were selected with a view to setting concrete objectives and restricting the scope of operations, it will be necessary to spread resources very thinly and extremely difficult to measure the progress achieved. 
Brez odločitev na ravni programov pobude Skupnosti, s katerimi bi se določili konkretni cilji in zožilo področje uporabe, bo njihovo izvajanje privedlo do skromnih sredstev in doseženi napredek bo izredno težko izmeriti.
Are the eligible areas clearly defined? 
Ali so območja, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, jasno opredeljena?
When the new guidelines were being prepared, the matter of defining eligible areas was raised in respect of Strand A. The effectiveness of cross-border cooperation starts to decline some 50 to 70 km from the border. 
Med pripravo novih smernic se je za usmeritev A postavilo vprašanje opredelitve območij, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje. Učinkovitost čezmejnega sodelovanja se začne zmanjševati okoli 50 do 70 kilometrov od meje.
In the absence of a more subtle zoning instrument, the areas were once again defined on the basis of the NUTS III nomenclature (see glossary). As a result, some areas extend up to 200 km from the border, and further in certain Member States. 
Ker ni nobenega instrumenta, ki bi omogočal boljšo razdelitev ozemlja, so bila območja ponovno določena na podlagi nomenklature NUTS III (glej glosar), zaradi česar so bila določena območja do 200 kilometrov od meje, v nekaterih državah članicah pa še več.
Almost all of the Strand A CIPs examined cover eligible areas stretching more than 70 km from the border (Ems-Dollart Region, Alps, Ireland-Wales and Spain-Portugal). 
Med pregledanimi programi pobude Skupnosti v okviru usmeritve A skoraj vsi zajemajo območja, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje in se raztezajo več kot 70 kilometrov od meje (program pobude Skupnosti za regijo Ems-Dollart, Alpe, Irsko in Wales ter Španijo in Portugalsko).
This issue does not arise for Strands B and C, which, unlike Strand A, do not cover cooperation between neighbouring regions. Were the guidelines and methodology documents made available to the Member States at the appropriate time? 
Usmeritvi B in C to vprašanje ne zadeva, ker se ne nanašata na sodelovanje sosednjih območij, kot to velja za usmeritev A. Ali so bili smernice in metodološki dokumenti dostopni državam članicam ob primernem času?
The Commission first gave thought to the strategy for Interreg III at the end of 1997. 
Prve strateške zamisli Komisije o pobudi Interreg III segajo v konec leta 1997.
A document setting out the basic options was drawn up in March 1998 (1). 
Marca 1998 je bil pripravljen dokument, ki je predstavljal osnovne možnosti (1).
The Commission guidelines were not finalised until January/May 2000, or, in the case of Strand C, the early months of 2001. However, given the particular difficulties associated with the preparation of Interreg programmes, the Member States had already set to work. 
Smernice Komisije so bile dokončane šele med januarjem in majem 2000 oziroma v prvih mesecih leta 2001 za usmeritev C. Tako so ob upoštevanju posebnih težav, povezanih s pripravo programa Interreg, države članice že pričele svoje delo.
An analogous situation emerged with regard to the various methodological working papers that the Commission prepared specifically for Interreg (see paragraph 21). 
Podoben je bil položaj pri različnih metodoloških delovnih dokumentih, ki jih je Komisija pripravila posebej za Interreg (glej odstavek 21).
Owing to the complexity of the Interreg CI, the late availability of the guidelines and working papers contributed to the fact that the CIPsŐ effective launch was delayed. 
Zaradi zapletenosti pobude Skupnosti Interreg je pozna razpoložljivost smernic in metodoloških dokumentov prispevala k zamudi pri učinkoviti uvedbi programov pobude Skupnosti.
It may also have resulted in the poor quality of some CIP proposals. 
Privedla bi lahko tudi do slabe kakovosti nekaterih predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti.
(1) ÔTrans-European cooperation initiative for balanced developmentŐ, 6.3.1998, DG XVI/A/1. 
(1) „Pobuda transevropskega sodelovanja za uravnotežen razvoj“, 6.3.1998, DG XVI/A/1.
The Commission checks that all CIPs conform to the guidelines. 
Komisija preverja skladnost programov pobude Skupnosti s smernicami.
The Court feels that the examination procedure needs to be sufficiently detailed and that the shortcomings that are revealed should lead to improvements in the CIPs. 
Sodišče meni, da bi moral biti postopek preverjanja dovolj podroben in da bi ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti morale nato privesti do izboljšav v programih pobude Skupnosti.
Lastly, it is crucial that the CIPs be adopted on time in order to avoid interrupting the cooperation established by Interreg II and allow utilisation of the available appropriations. 
Ne nazadnje morajo biti programi pobude Skupnosti sprejeti pravočasno, da ne pride do prekinitve sodelovanja, ki je bilo vzpostavljeno s pobudo Interreg II, in da se omogoči izkoriščanje razpoložljivih odobrenih sredstev.
Procedures for the examination of programme proposals have been devised and put in place and consist of two stages. The first stage looks at admissibility and establishes that there has been formal compliance with Community legislation. 
Določeni in vzpostavljeni so bili postopki za preverjanje predlogov programov, ki potekajo v dveh fazah: prva se nanaša na sprejemljivost in poskuša zagotoviti formalno upoštevanje predpisov Skupnosti.
The second stage focuses on programme quality and serves as a basis for the improvements that will be agreed to programme content in the course of negotiations with the Member States. 
Druga faza preverjanja se nanaša na kakovost programov in je podlaga za njihove vsebinske izboljšave, do katerih pride med pogajanji z državami članicami.
The Commission services applied a list of criteria for examining CIP proposals during the first stage only. 
Službe Komisije so seznam meril za preverjanje predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti uporabile samo v prvi fazi.
The list in question is fairly general, and the sole purpose of checking was to obtain assurance that certain formal elements were present in the programme proposals. 
Seznam je precej splošen in edini cilj teh preverjanj je bil zagotoviti formalno prisotnost nekaterih elementov v predlogih programov.
The Court was unable during its audit to source clearly every one of the observations made during the second examination stage and forwarded by the Commission to the Member States. 
Sodišču med revizijo ni uspelo izslediti vseh pripomb, ki so bile ugotovljene med drugo fazo preverjanja in jih je Komisija poslala državam članicam.
Records did not always include a monitoring document indicating to what extent a response had been made to the requests or observations contained in the letter to the Member States (save in the cases of Ireland-Wales, Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein and Ems-Dollart Region and, in part, Western Mediterranean). 
Dosjeji niso vedno vsebovali dokumenta o spremljanju, iz katerega bi bilo razvidno, koliko so bile zahteve ali pripombe, izražene v pismu, poslanem državam članicam, izpolnjene (razen za programe pobude Skupnosti za Irsko in Wa-les, Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein, regijo Ems-Dollart in delno za zahodno Sredozemlje).
The procedure for examining CIP proposals did not always result in the desired improvements in CIP quality: (a) the concerns that had caused a first programme proposal to be judged inadmissible were not always sufficiently taken into account. 
Postopek preverjanja predlogov pobude Skupnosti ni vedno prinesel želenih izboljšav z vidika kakovosti teh programov: (a) vidiki, ki so privedli do nesprejemljivosti prvega predloga programa, niso bili vedno dovolj upoštevani.
In the case of the Spain-Portugal CIP it had been ruled that the JTS was not functioning as required by the guidelines. 
Za program pobude Skupnosti za Španijo in Portugalsko je bilo ugotovljeno, da skupni tehnični sekretariat ni deloval v skladu s smernicami.
This matter re-emerged during the CommissionŐs negotiations with the Member States. 
Ta točka je bila ponovno izpostavljena med pogajanji Komisije z državami članicami.
Although no substantive changes were made, the Commission subsequently adopted the programme proposal; (b) notwithstanding the many changes that were made to the CIP proposals, serious failings were not redressed. However, shortcomings concerning strategy and indicators, for example, had been identified as early as the first stage of examination (Alps, Spain-Portugal and Western Mediterranean). In some cases (Spain-Portugal and Western Mediter-ranean), the Commission services with particular responsibility for regional policy evaluation had even recommended declaring the CIP proposals inadmissible. 
Čeprav niso uvedli nobenih večjih sprememb, je Komisija pozneje predlog programa sprejela; (b) kljub številnim spremembam predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti pa večje pomanjkljivosti niso bile odpravljene; vrzeli so bile ugotovljene že med prvo fazo preverjanja, na primer na področju strategije in kazalnikov (programi pobude Skupnosti za Alpe, Španijo in Portugalsko ter za zahodno Sredozemlje). V nekaterih primerih (programi pobude Skupnosti za Španijo in Portugalsko ter za zahodno Sredozemlje) so službe Komisije, ki so bile zlasti pristojne za oceno regionalnih politik, celo ocenile, da bi bilo treba predloge programov pobude Skupnosti označiti kot nesprejemljive.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/11 34. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/11 34.
Given the number of programmes to be examined and the complexity of the examination procedure, improvements to CIP content could have been achieved through a more structured approach based on detailed criteria and aimed at obtaining a transparent, homogeneous evaluation (see paragraphs 51 to 78). 
Ob upoštevanju števila programov, ki jih je treba pregledati, in zapletenosti tega preverjanja bi lahko izboljšali vsebino programov pobude Skupnosti z bolj strukturiranim pristopom, ki bi temeljil na podrobnih merilih ter bi omogočal pregledno ter enotno oceno (glej odstavke 51–78).
These criteria should then have been communicated to the Member States, in one of the working documents drawn up by the Commission, before they embarked on the task of preparing the CIPs (see paragraph 21). 
Ta merila bi bilo nato treba sporočiti državam članicam v enem od delovnih dokumentov, ki jih pripravi Komisija, preden začnejo pripravljati programe pobude Skupnosti (glej odstavek 21).
Did the Commission approve the CIPs within the agreed deadlines? 
Ali je Komisija odobrila programe pobude Skupnosti v predvidenih rokih?