natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
58 The Commission has reminded the four Member States to provide the self-assessment. 
58 Komisija je štiri države članice opomnila, naj zagotovijo samoocenjevanje.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 60 and 61 The way the chosen system is implemented contributes to a high or low level of data quality. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 60 in 61 Način izvajanja izbranega sistema prispeva k visoki ali nizki ravni kakovosti podatkov.
62 As clearly stated in the EU legislation (Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009), the national committee first approves the selection plan before submitting it to the Commission. 
62 Kot je jasno navedeno v zakonodaji EU (člen 7 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1217/2009), državni odbor načrt za izbor najprej odobri, potem pa ga predloži Komisiji.
National statistical institutes are represented in the national committees, where they provide expert advice on precision parameters and confidence bands. 
Nacionalni statistični uradi so zastopani v nacionalnih odborih, kjer zagotavljajo strokovne nasvete v zvezi s parametri natančnosti in razponi zaupanja.
In the past, the Commission did not have the complete information mentioned by the Court. 
Komisija v preteklosti ni imela popolnih informacij, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče.
However, the situation has improved in recent years. 
V zadnjih letih pa se je stanje izboljšalo.
63 The sample size shall not depend exclusively on the total number of farms, but it shall ensure coverage of agricultural activities according to the diversity of the agricultural sector in terms of farm types and sizes in each region. 
63 Velikost vzorca ni odvisna izključno od skupnega števila kmetij, temveč zagotavlja pokritost kmetijskih dejavnosti skladno z raznovrstnostjo kmetijskega sektorja v smislu vrst in velikosti kmetij v vsaki regiji.
Therefore, a certain share of farms can be considered representative or not depending on how similar the farms in the same cluster are. 
Tako lahko za določen delež kmetij velja, da je reprezentativen ali da ni, odvisno od tega, kako zelo so si kmetije v istem grozdu podobne.
As regards the Spanish sample, the Court’s analysis is based on data collected under the previous contract, which did not always ensure the desired representativeness. 
Kar zadeva španski vzorec, je analiza Sodišča temeljila na podatkih, zbranih v okviru prejšnje pogodbe, ki ni vedno zagotavljala želene reprezentativnosti.
This contract has been revised and improvements are reflected in the data regarding the following years. 
Ta pogodba je bila revidirana, izboljšave pa se kažejo v podatkih v zvezi z naslednjimi leti.
64 The Commission is aware of the methods used to select sample farms, as this information is included in the selection plan factsheet to be sent every year by the Member States (Article 3 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/220). 
64 Komisija pozna metode, uporabljene za izbiro kmetij v vzorcu, saj so te informacije vključene v informativni list načrta za izbor, ki ga morajo države članice poslati vsako leto (člen 3 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/220).
This knowledge of the methods allows further analyses of any influence that subjective factors could have on the representativeness of the income information that is obtained. 
To poznavanje metod omogoča nadaljnje analize morebitnega vpliva, ki bi ga subjektivni dejavniki lahko imeli na reprezentativnost pridobljenih informacij o dohodkih.
As regards the Spanish sample, the subregions are not one of the dimensions of the coverage. 
Kar zadeva španski vzorec, podregije niso ena od razsežnosti pokritosti.
In fact, the FADN data shall be representative of the FADN division (region), and the sample size is determined to ensure this level of coverage. 
Dejansko so podatki mreže FADN reprezentativni za oddelek mreže FADN (regijo), velikost vzorca pa se določi tako, da se zagotovi ta raven pokritosti.
However, this does not mean that evaluating direct payments will be impossible only because the policy regions do not fully correspond to the statistical regions. 
Vendar to ne pomeni, da neposrednih plačil ne bo mogoče vrednotiti samo zato, ker regije politik ne ustrezajo popolnoma statističnim regijam.
Finally, the representation of territorial structures is ensured at higher level of geographical aggregation (as it is often the case for sample surveys). 
Nazadnje, reprezentativnost teritorialnih struktur je zagotovljena na višji ravni geografskega združevanja (kot je pogosto v primeru vzorčnih raziskav).
Reply of the Commission 63 Common Commission reply to paragraphs 65 and 66 The Commission is aware of these difficulties and adequate measures are undertaken when analysing the data for those clusters with fewer sample farms. 
Odgovori Komisije 63 Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 65 in 66 Komisija se zaveda teh težav, zato so pri analizi podatkov za zadevne grozde z manjšim številom kmetij v vzorcu sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi.
It is worth stressing that the FADN analyses are mainly run by economic analysts who work at the Commission in close cooperation with data checkers and the liaison agencies. 
Velja poudariti, da analize mreže FADN večinoma izvajajo ekonomski analitiki, ki delajo pri Komisiji v tesnem sodelovanju s pregledovalci podatkov in organi za zvezo.
Also, for each external data request coming from researchers, data analysts provide all necessary assistance and information to ensure proper interpretation of the data. 
Poleg tega podatkovni analitiki za vsak zunanji zahtevek raziskovalcev za podatke zagotovijo vso potrebno podporo in informacije, da se zagotovi pravilna razlaga podatkov.
68 The Commission is aware that, in smaller farms, bookkeeping practices are less common. 
68 Komisija se zaveda, da so na manjših kmetijah računovodske prakse manj običajne.
This is why, for countries such as Romania and Spain, more attention has been put into analysing possible solutions to the risk of collecting poor-quality data. 
Zato je bilo pri državah, kot sta Romunija in Španija, več pozornosti posvečene preučitvi morebitnih rešitev za tveganje zbiranja nekakovostnih podatkov.
After analysing the structural development of the agriculture sector, the Spanish liaison agency proposed an increase in the threshold as from the 2015 accounting year data, with the same number of sample farms, which will generate substitution of small farms with no bookkeeping with more representative reporting farms. 
Španski organ za zvezo je po preučitvi strukturnega razvoja kmetijskega sektorja predlagal povišanje praga za podatke od obračunskega leta 2015 z enakim številom kmetij v vzorcu, tako da bodo majhne kmetije, ki nimajo knji-govodstva, nadomeščene z bolj reprezentativnimi kmetijami, ki sporočajo podatke.
As for Romania, given the complex structure of agriculture in this country, where around one third of all of the EU’s smaller farms are found, the FADN sample and the data quality have been kept under strict observation since the first years following accession to the EU. 
Glede Romunije – ob upoštevanju zapletene strukture kmetijstva v tej državi, kjer je približno tretjina vseh manjših kmetij EU – se vzorec mreže FADN in kakovost podatkov budno spremljata od prvega leta po pristopu države k EU.
69 The FADN results are presented by AWU (e.g., income indicator FNVA/AWU), which makes them comparable irrespective of the amount of hours of work involved in particular holdings. 
69 Rezultati mreže FADN so predstavljeni po letnih delovnih enotah (npr. kazalnik dohodka NDVK/LDE), zaradi česar so primerljivi ne glede na število ur dela, opravljenih na posameznih kmetijskih gospodarstvih.
70 A balance needs to be found between fast publication and satisfactory data quality. 
70 Najti je treba ravnovesje med hitro objavo in zadovoljivo kakovostjo podatkov.
As information on farm income is fundamental for the CAP and cannot be used without validation, priority is given to data quality, though continuous efforts are made to have faster availability of the data (2 000 variables questionnaire asked annually in 28 Member States to about 85 000 farms). 
Ker so informacije o dohodku kmetije bistvene za SKP in jih brez potrditve ni mogoče uporabiti, ima prednost kakovost podatkov, vendar ob neneh-nem trudu, da bi bili podatki na voljo hitreje (vprašalnik z 2 000 spremenljivkami se vsako leto predloži v izpolnitev 85 000 kmetijam v 28 državah članicah).
Moreover, availability of validated FADN data is not lengthier than the availability of any other data source where thorough data checks and validation of individual farm data are needed. 
Potrjeni podatki mreže FADN tudi niso dani na voljo nič pozneje kot podatki iz katerega koli drugega vira, kjer so potrebni temeljiti pregledi in potrjevanje posameznih podatkov o kmetiji.
The FADN based analyses published by the Commission include estimates which allow analysing the data with longer perspective than available yearly datasets. 
Analize na podlagi mreže FADN, ki jih objavlja Komisija, vključujejo ocene, ki omogočajo analizo podatkov za obdobje, ki presega razpoložljive letne podatkovne sklope.
Furthermore, joint efforts put in place by the Commission and the Member States have already clearly improved the quality of the data which will be available for the evaluation of the 2013 CAP reform. 
Poleg tega se je zaradi skupnih prizadevanj Komisije in držav članic že očitno izboljšala kakovost podatkov, ki bodo na voljo za vrednotenje reforme SKP iz leta 2013.
Reply of the Commission 64 72 The potential EU financing in Romania equals 160 euro times 6 000 sample farms, i.e. 960 000 euro per year. 
Odgovori Komisije 64 72 Morebitno financiranje EU v Romuniji znaša 160 EUR krat 6 000 kmetij v vzorcu, kar je 960 000 EUR na leto.
The Commission is aware of difficulties encountered in this Member State in using available funding (though the most recent information suggests that money is now being used to improve the IT system for data collection), but it does estimate that this would be enough to improve the FADN system in Romania. 
Komisija se zaveda težav, s katerimi se spopadajo v tej državi članici pri uporabi razpoložljivih sredstev (čeprav najnovejše informacije kažejo, da se denar zdaj porablja za izboljšanje sistema IT za zbiranje podatkov), vendar ocenjuje, da bo to zadoščalo za izboljšanje sistema mreže FADN v Romuniji.
Following recent years’ improvements in the FADN in Spain, the Ministry of Agriculture has restarted the publication of FADN-based data on its website and in the Anuario de estadísticas agrarias. 
Po izboljšavah mreže FADN v zadnjih letih v Španiji je ministrstvo za kmetijstvo podatke, ki temeljijo na mreži FADN, znova začelo objavljati na svoji spletni strani in v „Anuario de Estadísticas Agrarias“.
This is a much-welcomed first step towards the use of the data for national purposes. 
To je zelo dobrodošel prvi korak k uporabi podatkov za nacionalne namene.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 68. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 68.
73 A quality framework for FADN exists, and is composed of legal, organisational and procedural parts. — requirements for FADN and for FADN data are set in its basic regulation; — verification of quality of data received from Member States and measures foreseen to improve it are described in the official procedures of the unit in charge of the FADN. 
73 Okvir za zagotavljanje kakovosti za mrežo FADN obstaja, sestavljen pa je iz pravnega, organizacijskega in postopkovnega dela: – zahteve za mrežo FADN in njene podatke so določene v njeni temeljni uredbi; – preverjanje kakovosti podatkov, prejetih iz držav članic, in predvideni ukrepi za njihovo izboljšanje so opisani v uradnih postopkih enote, ki je odgovorna za mrežo FADN.
The rules governing the FADN clearly include the concept of ‘duly completed farm returns’ and verification by the Commission (Article 11 and Article 13 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2015/220). 
Pravila, ki veljajo za mrežo FADN, jasno vključujejo koncept „ustrezno izpolnjenih poročil s kmetijskega gospodarstva“ in preverjanje, ki ga opravi Komisija (člena 11 in 13 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/220).
74 The accuracy of the data delivered to the Commission is assessed following the same procedure for all the Member States (i.e., annual verification of data quality as described at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/collect_ en.cfm#tnfqc and on-the-spot visits to 3/4 countries every year). 
74 Točnost podatkov, predloženih Komisiji, se za vse države članice ocenjuje po enakem postopku (tj. z letnim preverjanjem kakovosti podatkov, kot je opisano na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/collect_en.cfm#tnfqc, in z obiski na kraju samem v treh četrtinah držav vsako leto).
75 The Commission is aware of FADN performance problems in individual Member States and takes actions to deal with identified weaknesses. 
75 Komisija se zaveda težav pri uspešnosti izvajanja mreže FADN v posameznih državah članicah in sprejema ukrepe za obravnavanje odkritih slabosti.
An annual plan of on-the-spot visits has been put into place, together with action plans and follow-up meetings to assess the progress made on agreed points. 
Vzpostavljeni so bili letni načrt obiskov na kraju samem, akcijski načrti in sestanki za nadaljnje spremljanje, da bi se ocenil doseženi napredek v zvezi z dogovorjenimi točkami.
This approach has led to considerable improvements in several Member States, for example: — following visit to Spain in 2014 and its follow-up, the Spanish authorities have reinforced the FADN staff, modified the terms of the contract with data collectors and investigated the weak points of the data, so that the use and publication of FADN data has restarted; — following visits to Denmark in 2013 and Finland in 2015 and their follow-ups, some issues in the implementation of the respective samples have been analysed, and solutions have been proposed and are being implemented. 
Ta pristop je pripeljal do pomembnih izboljšav v več državah članicah, na primer: – španski organi so po obisku v Španiji leta 2014 in nadaljnjih ukrepih po njem povečali število osebja za mrežo FADN, spremenili pogoje pogodbe z zbiratelji podatkov in preučili šibke točke podatkov, tako da so se podatki mreže FADN spet začeli uporabljati in objavljati; – po obiskih na Danskem leta 2013 in Finskem leta 2015 ter nadaljnjih ukrepih po njih so bila analizirana nekatera vprašanja v zvezi z izvajanjem zadevnih vzorcev ter predlagane rešitve, ki se že izvajajo.
The Greek FADN is part of an action plan and a protocol of cooperation between the various national authorities involved in agricultural statistics which aim to integrate agricultural statistics and administrative data in a united system of primary sector administrative and statistical data. 
Grška mreža FADN je del akcijskega načrta in protokola o sodelovanju med različnimi nacionalnimi organi, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijsko statistiko, da bi se kmetijska statistika in upravni podatki vključili v enoten sistem upravnih in statističnih podatkov primarnega sektorja.
This action plan is included in the 2014 revision of the memorandum of understanding for Greece that includes a list of actions and benchmarks agreed between the Commission services to address issues of concern in respect of which the Greek authorities committed to achieve set targets. 
Ta akcijski načrt je vključen v revizijo memoranduma o soglasju za Grčijo iz leta 2014, ki vključuje seznam ukrepov in referenčnih meril, o katerih so se dogovorile službe Komisije, da bi obravnavali pereča vprašanja, v zvezi s katerimi so se grški organi zavezali doseči zadane cilje.
Reply of the Commission 65 76 See Commission reply to paragraph 70. 
Odgovori Komisije 65 76 Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 70.
81 The objectives of the direct payments system as a whole are set out in recital 24 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
81 Cilji sistema neposrednih plačil kot celote so opredeljeni v uvodni izjavi 24 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
The objectives of the constituent payments concerning ‘greening’, areas facing natural constraints, young farmers, voluntary coupled support and small farms are set out in recitals 37, 46, 47, 49 and 54, respectively, of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013. 
Cilji sestavnih plačil, ki zadevajo „zeleno komponento“, površine z naravnimi omejitvami, mlade kmete, prostovoljno vezano podporo in majhne kmetije, so opredeljeni v uvodnih izjavah 37, 46, 47, 49 oziroma 54 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 82. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 82.
82 The Commission considers that assessing whether the CAP’s income-related objectives are being achieved will always involve skilled evaluation based on a wide range of information. 
82 Komisija meni, da bo ocenjevanje, ali se dosegajo z dohodkom povezani cilji SKP, vedno vključevalo strokovno vrednotenje na podlagi zelo raznovrstnih informacij.
This is partly due to the diversity of the EU farm sector. 
Deloma je tako zaradi raznovrstnosti kmetijskega sektorja EU.
It is also partly because underlying adjustments may be taking place — in the farm sector or outside it — which are positive (or negative) for long-term farm income prospects but are not clearly communicated by a few simple indicators. 
Deloma pa tudi zato, ker se morda izvajajo temeljne prilagoditve – v kmetijskem sektorju ali zunaj njega –, ki so pozitivne (ali negativne) za dolgoročne obete za dohodek kmetije, vendar s peščico preprostih kazalnikov niso jasno sporočene.
All interpretations of objectives set out in the treaty, and all approaches to evaluating their achievement, must be sufficiently broad to do justice to this complexity. 
Vse razlage ciljev, določenih v Pogodbi, in vsi pristopi k vrednotenju njihovega izpolnjevanja morajo biti dovolj široki, da ustrezajo tej kompleksnosti.
The fact that direct payments help to achieve several objectives simultaneously, and the variety of options available to Member States in implementing direct payments, may not lessen the difficulty of evaluation. 
Dejstvo, da neposredna plačila pomagajo dosegati več ciljev hkrati, in različnih možnosti, ki so državam članicam na voljo pri izvajanju neposrednih plačil, ne sme zmanjšati zahtevnosti vrednotenja.
However, the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages. 
Vendar prednosti tega položaja prevladajo nad slabostmi.
Pursuing both economic and environmental objectives through direct payments is in some respects an efficient approach to policy and emphasises that ‘sustainability’ has more than one dimension. 
Prizadevanje za gospodarske in okoljske cilje prek neposrednih plačil je v nekaterih pogledih učinkovit pristop k politiki in poudarja, da je „trajnost“ večrazsežnostna.
83 The indicators should follow the RACER criteria mentioned by the Court only where possible. 
83 Kazalniki bi morali merilom „RACER“, ki jih je omenilo Sodišče, slediti le, kadar je to mogoče.
If necessary, proxy indicators might need to be used to represent a phenomenon in the absence of a direct indicator5. 
Po potrebi bo brez neposrednega kazalnika morda treba za predstavitev pojava uporabiti nadomestne kazalnike5.
84 The data on agricultural income (factor income and entrepreneurial income) are available and published online by the Commission. 
84 Podatki o kmetijskem dohodku (faktorskem in podjetniškem) so na voljo in jih Komisija objavlja na spletu.
The changes in the indicator values need to be interpreted and put in context to be able to make the causal link with the policy measures. 
Za vzpostavitev vzročne povezave z ukrepi politike je treba spremembe vrednosti kazalnikov razložiti in umestiti v kontekst.
This is the role of the evaluator in a policy evaluation, since no indicator will give information about what caused its change in value. 
To je naloga ocenjevalca pri vrednotenju politike, kajti noben kazalnik ne bo dal informacij o tem, kaj je povzročilo spremembo njegove vrednosti.
85 Even if there is no fixed target, the indicators allow observation of whether income is increasing or not. 
85 Čeprav ni točno določenega cilja, je s kazalniki mogoče spremljati, ali se dohodek povečuje ali ne.
Only at the evaluation stage, taking into account context, intervening factors, etc., is it possible to assess the net effect of measures and whether they contributed to an evolution. 
Šele v fazi vrednotenja – ob upoštevanju konteksta, vmesnih dejavnikov itd. – je mogoče oceniti, kakšen je neto učinek ukrepov in ali so prispevali k razvoju.
This can never be directly read from an indicator. 
Tega ni nikoli mogoče razbrati neposredno iz kazalnika.
5 See: http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/guidelines/docs/br_toolbox_en.pdf, p. 
5 Glej: http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/guidelines/docs/br_toolbox_en.pdf, str.
Reply of the Commission 66 Box 4 - First indent The Commission, together with the Member States, has developed a set of indicators which combined should allow to give the evaluators the information needed. 
250–251. Odgovori Komisije 66 Okvir 4 – Prva alinea Komisija je skupaj z državami članicami razvila nabor kazalnikov, ki bi združeni ocenjevalcem morali dati potrebne informacije.
The indicator is intended to inform about the dependence of farmers on the direct payments, not about their income as such. 
Namen kazalnika je obveščati o odvisnosti kmetov od neposrednih plačil, ne pa o njihovem dohodku kot takem.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 38. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 38.
Box 4 - Second indent The indicator variability of farm income, which is based on the FADN data, cannot provide information about effectiveness of direct payments, since in its calculation direct payments are not taken into account. 
Okvir 4 – Druga alinea Kazalnik spremenljivosti dohodka kmetij, ki temelji na podatkih mreže FADN, ne more zagotavljati informacij o uspešnosti neposrednih plačil, ker pri njegovem izračunu niso upoštevana neposredna plačila.
The indicator measures the instability of farm income in the absence of direct payments (or any other relationship with the public sector, e.g. taxes). 
Kazalnik meri nestabilnost dohodka kmetije, kadar ni neposrednih plačil (ali drugih povezav z javnim sektorjem, npr. davkov).
Box 4 - Third indent The indicator value added for primary producers is not intended to give information about income, but about the competitive position of the farmers in the food production chain. 
Okvir 4 – Tretja alinea Kazalnik dodane vrednosti za primarne proizvajalce ni namenjen zagotavljanju informacij o dohodku, temveč o konkurenčnem položaju kmetov v verigi proizvodnje živil.
86 Relevant data are available (e.g. as output indicators). 
86 Ustrezni podatki so na voljo (npr. kazalniki realizacij).
87 The indicators in isolation do not provide information about efficiency or alternative scenarios. 
87 Sami kazalniki ne zagotavljajo informacij o učinkovitosti ali alternativnih scenarijih.
This is the role of evaluation and impact assessment respectively. 
To je naloga vrednotenja oziroma ocene učinka.
Conclusions and recommendations 88 The audit often links the available income indicators to the analysis of the effectiveness of direct payments. 
Zaključki in priporočila 88 Revizija kazalnike razpoložljivega dohodka pogosto povezuje z analizo uspešnosti neposrednih plačil.
Yet income is not the only CAP objective and direct payments are not the only CAP instrument having an impact on income; nor is their impact limited to income as they support the joint delivery of private and public goods. 
Vendar dohodek ni edini cilj SKP, neposredna plačila pa niso edini instrument SKP, ki vpliva na dohodek, niti ni njihov učinek omejen na dohodek, saj podpirajo skupno zagotavljanje zasebnih in javnih dobrin.
Article 110(3) of Regulation (EU) 1306/2013 clearly requires assessment of the combined impact of all CAP instruments in relation to the CAP’s common objectives. 
V členu 110(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 se jasno zahteva ocenjevanje skupnega učinka vseh instrumentov SKP v zvezi s skupnimi cilji SKP.