natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
8 Final implementation report, ‘Relazione di esecuzione delle spese sostenute a valere sul contributo del Fondo di Solidarietà dell’Unione Europea (FSUE)’, Protezione Civile Nazionale, p. 
8 Končno poročilo o izvajanju, Relazione di esecuzione delle spese sostenute a valere sul contributo del Fondo di Solidarietà dell’Unione Europea (FSUE) (poročilo o izvrševanju odhodkov iz prispevka Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (SSEU)), nacionalna civilna zaščita, str.
9 ibid. 
9 Ibid.
10 ibid. 
10 Ibid.
10 Table 2 acTiviTies To be financed by The eUsf (million eUro) Source: EUSF implementation agreement. 
10 Tabela 2 DejavnosTi, ki naj bi bile financirane iz sseU (v milijonih eUr) Vir: Sporazum o izvajanju SSEU.
National budget EUSF contribution Total First emergency operations 603 50 653 MAP and MUSP projects 227 94 321 CASE project 460 350 810 1 290 494 1 784 Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
Nacionalni proračun Prispevek SSEU Skupaj Prvi nujni ukrepi 603 50 653 Projekta MAP in MUSP 227 94 321 Projekt CASE 460 350 810 1 290 494 1 784 Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
11 AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH 7. 
11 OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP 7.
The audit set out to answer three specific audit questions: (1) Were the operations provided for in the implementation agreement compliant with the EUSF regulation? 
Namen revizije je bil odgovoriti na tri specifična revizijska vprašanja: (1) So bili ukrepi, določeni v sporazumu o izvajanju, skladni z uredbo o SSEU?
(2) Was the CASE project well planned and designed? 
(2) Je bil projekt CASE dobro načrtovan in zasnovan?
(3) Was the CASE project implemented with due regard to economy? 
(3) Je bil projekt CASE izveden z ustrezno gospodarnostjo?
For audit questions (2) and (3) the audit focused on the CASE project, which absorbed most of the EUSF grant (see paragraph 6). 
Pri revizijskih vprašanjih (2) in (3) je bila revizija osredotočena na projekt CASE, za katerega je bila porabljena večina nepovratnih sredstev SSEU (glej odstavek 6).
The audit took place in the period November 2011 to February 2012 and covered a sample of five procurement procedures and 12 contracts for the construction of buildings and supply of furniture, concrete, pillars and seismic isolators. 
Potekala je od novembra 2011 do februarja 2012 in je zajela vzorec petih postopkov za oddajo javnega naročila in 12 pogodb o oddaji javnega naročila za gradnjo stavb in dobavo pohištva, betona, stebrov in potresnih izolatorjev.
The sample covered 35 % of the amounts contracted for the CASE project (see Annex II). 
Vzorec je zajel 35 % zneskov, za katere so bile v okviru projekta CASE sklenjene pogodbe o oddaji javnega naročila (glej Prilogo II).
The documentary analyses were complemented by interviews with and observations at the Department of Civil Protection, project sites and relevant stakeholders in the earthquake zone. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
Analize dokumentacije so dopolnjevali pogovori in opažanja v službi civilne zaščite, na krajih projektov in pri relevantnih zainteresiranih straneh na potresnem območju. Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
12 OBSERVATIONS IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT AND THE EUSF REGULATION THE EUSF REGULATION DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR SOLUTIONS SUCH AS THE CASE PROJECT 9. 
12 OPAŽANJA SPORAZUM O IZVAJANJU IN UREDBA O SSEU UREDBA O SSEU NE PREDVIDEVA REŠITEV, KOT JE PROJEKT CASE 9.
The purpose of the EUSF is to help Member States and countries in the process of negotiating their accession to the EU respond to major natural disasters and to complement their public expenditure on the following essential emergency operations11: — immediate restoration to working order of infrastructure and plant in the fields of energy, drinking water, waste water, transport, telecommunications, health and education; — providing temporary accommodation and emergency services to meet the immediate needs of the population concerned; — immediate securing of preventive infrastructures and measures for the immediate protection of the cultural heritage; — immediate cleaning up of disaster-stricken areas, including natural zones. 
Cilj SSEU je pomagati državam članicam in državam, ki se pogajajo o pristopu k Evropski uniji, pri odzivanju na večje naravne nesreče in dopolnjevati njihove javne odhodke pri naslednjih bistvenih nujnih ukrepih11: — takojšnji usposobitvi infrastrukture in naprav na področju energetike, pitne vode, odpadnih voda, prometa, telekomunikacij, zdravja in izobraževanja; — zagotovitvi začasne nastanitve in nujnih storitev za zadovoljitev nujnih potreb prizadetega prebivalstva; — takojšnji zagotovitvi preventivne infrastrukture in ukrepov za takojšnjo zaščito kulturne dediščine; — takojšnji ureditvi prizadetih območij, vključno z naravnimi predeli.
The Commission has interpreted12 this to mean that the amount financing emergency operations may not exceed what is regarded as immediately necessary (restoration to working order) and will not, as a general rule, cover the cost of full reconstruction. 
Komisija si je to razlagala12, kot da znesek za financiranje nujnih ukrepov ne sme presegati vsote, ki šteje za takoj potrebno (obnovitev delovanja), in praviloma ne krije stroškov polne obnove.
All the operations were implemented according to the implementation agreement. However, whereas the EUSF regulation provided for operations such as the first emergency relief operations, assistance to the population and the MAP and MUSP projects, this was not the case for the CASE project. 
Vsi ukrepi so bili izvedeni v skladu s sporazumom o izvajanju, toda čeprav je uredba o SSEU predvidevala ukrepe, kot so prvi ukrepi nujne pomoči, pomoč prebivalstvu ter projekta MAP in MUSP, pa to ni veljalo za projekt CASE.
11 Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002. 
11 Člen 3(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2012/2002.
12 Report from the Commission — European Union Solidarity Fund — Annual Report 2002–2003 and Report on the experience gained after one year of applying the new instrument. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
12 Poročilo Komisije – Letno poročilo o Solidarnostnem skladu Evropske unije za obdobje 2002–2003 in poročilo o pridobljenih izkušnjah po enoletni uporabi novega instrumenta. Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
ELIGIBILITY OF THE INITIAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POPULATION 12. 
UPRAVIČENOST ZAČETNE POMOČI PREBIVALSTVU 12.
Following the earthquake, the Department of Civil Protection provided first emergency relief operations and assistance to around 67 000 people, who were, at the end of April 2009, accommodated in hotels and private houses (almost 32 000) and in tented camps (more than 35 000). 
Služba civilne zaščite je po potresu zagotovila prve ukrepe nujne pomoči in pomoč približno 67 000 ljudem, ki so bili na koncu aprila 2009 nasta-njeni v hotelih in zasebnih hišah (skoraj 32 000) ter v šotorskih naseljih (več kot 35 000).
The Fund’s resources for first emergency relief operations and assistance to the population were spent in accordance with the provisions of the EUSF regulation, as these consisted of essential emergency operations providing emergency services to meet the immediate needs of the population concerned. 
Sredstva sklada za prve ukrepe nujne pomoči in pomoč prebivalstvu so bila porabljena v skladu z določbami uredbe o SSEU, saj je šlo za bistvene nujne ukrepe, ki so zagotavljali nujne storitve za zadovoljitev nujnih potreb prizadetega prebivalstva.
ELIGIBILITY OF THE MAP AND MUSP PROJECTS 14. 
UPRAVIČENOST PROJEKTOV MAP IN MUSP 14.
The implementation agreement provided for the construction of 2 300 temporary houses (MAP) and 34 temporary schools (MUSP). 
V sporazumu o izvajanju je bila predvidena gradnja 2 300 začasnih bivališč (MAP) in 34 začasnih šol (MUSP).
According to the final implementation report, the Department of Civil Protection built 3 313 MAP houses and 33 temporary schools. 
Po navedbah v končnem poročilu o izvajanju je služba civilne zaščite zgradila 3 313 bivališč MAP in 33 začasnih šol.
In addition, 59 damaged schools were repaired and reinforced. 
Poleg tega je bilo popravljenih in utrjenih 59 poškodovanih šol.
The achievements of the MUSP project were especially relevant, because the rapid construction of schools enabled families with schoolchildren to remain in the L’Aquila area. 
Dosežki projekta MUSP so bili posebno pomembni, saj je hitra gradnja šol omogočila družinam s šolskimi otroki, da so ostale na območju L’Aquile.
Photo 2 — MAP project houses © European Court of Auditors. 
Fotografija 2 - Hiše v okviru projekta MAP © Evropsko računsko sodišče.
13 Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
13 Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
The MAP and MUSP projects were implemented in line with the provisions of the EUSF regulation. 
Projekta MAP in MUSP sta bila izvedena v skladu z določbami uredbe o SSEU.
Thus the MAP project provided the population with temporary accommodation and the MUSP project addressed the need for immediate restoration to working order in the field of education. 
Projekt MAP je prebivalstvu zagotovil začasno nastanitev, projekt MUSP pa je obravnaval potrebo po takojšnji usposobitvi infrastrukture na področju izobraževanja.
ELIGIBILITY OF THE CASE PROJECT 16. 
UPRAVIČENOST PROJEKTA CASE 16.
The implementation agreement provided for the construction of 160 temporary housing blocks13 containing 4 000 to 4 500 apartments to accommodate more than 15 000 people. 
V sporazumu o izvajanju je bila predvidena gradnja 160 začasnih stanovanjskih blokov13 z od 4 000 do 4 500 stanovanji za več kot 15 000 ljudi.
Altogether, 185 apartment blocks were constructed in less than a year after the earthquake. 
Manj kot leto dni po potresu je bilo zgrajenih skupaj 185 stanovanjskih blokov.
13 ‘Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni 2008’, a document signed by the Italian Department of Civil Protection, refers to a maximum duration of 10 years for provisional works, but a minimum of 50 years for permanent works. 
13 Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni 2008 (tehnični standardi za gradnjo), dokument, ki ga je podpisala italijanska služba civilne zaščite, kot najdaljši rok za začasna gradbena dela navaja 10 let, kot najkrajši rok za trajna gradbena dela pa 50 let.
14 Photo 3 — CASE project building © European Court of Auditors. 
14 Fotografija 3 - Stavba v okviru projekta CASE © Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Instead of providing temporary accommodation, as envisaged by the EUSF regulation, the project erected new permanent structures suitable for housing people during the years needed for reconstruction, which created a lasting impact on the landscape and housing stock of L’Aquila municipality. 
V okviru projekta so namesto zagotovitve začasne nastanitve, ki jo predvideva uredba o SSEU, zgradili nove trajne strukture, primerne za nastanitev v letih, ki bodo potrebna za obnovo, kar je trajno vplivalo na pokrajino in stavbni fond občine L’Aquila.
Although the Commission and the Italian authorities had stated in the implementation agreement that operations going beyond what was immediately necessary should not be financed (see paragraph 10), the CASE apartments are, with their high energy efficiency and seismic isolation, much better equipped than traditional temporary houses and many of the pre-existing buildings. 
Čeprav so Komisija in italijanski organi v sporazumu o izvajanju navedli, naj bi se ne financiralo ukrepov, ki presegajo takoj potrebno (glej odstavek 10), so stanovanja CASE z visoko energetsko učinkovitostjo in potresno izolacijo veliko bolje opremljena kot tradicionalna začasna bivališča in več prej obstoječih stavb.
After completing all CASE apartments, the Department of Civil Protection handed them over to L’Aquila municipality, which is currently managing them. 
Ko so bila končana vsa stanovanja CASE, jih je služba civilne zaščite predala občini L’Aquila, ki jih zdaj upravlja.
In the future, the municipality plans to sell some of the CASE apartments on the free market14. 
V prihodnosti namerava nekatera prodati na prostem trgu14.
Others would be used to address social housing needs and for letting to university students and others. 
Z drugimi naj bi krili potrebe po socialnih stanovanjih ter jih dajali v najem študentom in drugim.
Thus, the apartments are expected to generate revenue. 
Zato se za stanovanja pričakuje, da bodo ustvarjala prihodke.
Unlike the Structural Funds regulations, however, the EUSF regulation does not include provisions for such eventualities. This suggests that the regulation did not envisage the possibility of financing such new longer-term constructions15. 
Vendar uredba o SSEU za razliko od uredb o strukturnih skladih ne vsebuje določb o takšnih možnostih, kar kaže, da ne predvideva možnosti financiranja takšnih novih dolgoročnejših gradenj15.
According to the EUSF regulation, the scope of the EUSF is limited to the most urgent needs, while longer-term reconstruction must be left to other instruments. 
V skladu z uredbo o SSEU je obseg SSEU omejen na najnujnejše potrebe, dolgoročnejšo obnovo pa je treba prepustiti drugim instrumentom.
Therefore, as the CASE project aimed at providing durable accommodation, it did not comply with the EUSF objectives. 
Zato projekt CASE, ki je namenjen zagotavljanju trajne nastanitve, ni bil v skladu s cilji SSEU.
14 Municipality decision of 29 December 2011, verbale No 172. 
14 Sklep občine z dne 29. 12. 2011, zapisnik št.
15 In the explanatory memorandum to the Commission ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund’ (COM(2002) 514 final), the Commission states that the longer-term reconstruction of infrastructure and businesses must be left to other instruments. 
15 Komisija v obrazložitvenem memorandumu k predlogu Komisije za Uredbo Sveta o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (COM(2002) 514 final) navaja, da je treba dolgoročnejšo obnovo infrastrukture in podjetij prepustiti drugim instrumentom.
15 Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
15 Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CASE PROJECT THE STRATEGY UNDERLYING THE CASE PROJECT WAS EASY TO UNDERSTAND, BUT ... 
NAČRTOVANJE IN IZVAJANJE PROJEKTA CASE STRATEGIJE, NA KATERI TEMELJI PROJEKT CASE, NI BILO TEŽKO RAZUMETI, TODA ...
For the temporary accommodation of people who lived in L’Aquila municipality, the Italian authorities followed a different strategy from those implemented in past disasters. 
Pri začasni nastanitvi ljudi, ki so prebivali v občini L’Aquila, so italijanski organi uporabili drugačno strategijo od tiste, ki se je uporabljala pri nesrečah v preteklosti.
In past disasters, the strategy consisted of short-term accommodation in tented camps, followed by the construction of provisional dwellings and then the construction of permanent new buildings. 
V preteklosti je strategija zajemala kratkotrajno nastanitev v šotorskih naseljih, ki ji je sledila gradnja začasnih bivališč in nato gradnja trajnih novih stavb.
The strategy chosen following the L’Aquila earthquake consisted of longer than usual accommodation in tented camps, which the Italian authorities deemed possible because the earthquake happened before the summer, and the simultaneous rapid construction of high-quality apartment blocks. 
Strategija, izbrana po potresu v L’Aquili, je zajemala nastanitev v šotorskih naseljih, ki je bila dolgotrajnejša kot običajno in je bila po oceni italijanskih organov mogoča, ker je do potresa prišlo pred poletjem, in hkratno hitro gradnjo visokokakovostnih stanovanjskih blokov.
The aim was to provide, if possible before winter, fully equipped apartments, suitable for immediate occupation, including for people who had lost all their belongings during the earthquake. 
Cilj je bil, da se po možnosti pred zimo zagotovijo povsem opremljena stanovanja, primerna za takojšnjo vselitev, tudi za ljudi, ki so pri potresu izgubili vse imetje.
Figure 2 shows the strategy adopted by the Italian authorities. 
Na sliki 2 je prikazana strategija, ki so jo uporabili italijanski organi.
16 FIGURE 2 TRADITIONAL AND CASE STRATEGIES Traditional strategy CASE strategy Source: Department of Civil Protection. 
16 SLIKA 2 TRADICIONALNA STRATEGIJA IN STRATEGIJA CASE Tradicionalna strategija Strategija CASE Vir: Služba civilne zaščite.
IMMEDIATE Tents PROVISIONAL Barracks DEFINITIVE New buildings IMMEDIATE Tents PROVISIONAL High-quality standard homes Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
TAKOJŠNJE šotori ZAČASNO vojašnice DOKONČNO nove stavbe TAKOJŠNJE šotori ZAČASNO visokokakovostni standardni domovi Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
The Italian authorities considered that the choice of the strategy was justified for the following reasons: (a) the large number of people who lived in the damaged buildings, especially in the city of L’Aquila; (b) the L’Aquila landscape is mountainous and it is not easy to find enough land for the construction of a sufficient number of one-storey houses; (c) the expected long duration of the reconstruction work on the historical centre, which implied that accommodation would be required for a long period; (d) extreme climate conditions with very cold weather during the winter and very high temperatures in summer. 
Italijanski organi so menili, da je izbira strategije utemeljena, ker: (a) je v poškodovanih stavbah živelo veliko ljudi, posebno v mestu L’Aquila; (b) je pokrajina okoli L’Aquile gorata in je težko najti dovolj zemljišč za gradnjo zadostnega števila pritličnih hiš; (c) naj bi bila obnovitvena dela v zgodovinskem središču po pričakovanjih dolgotrajna, kar je pomenilo, da bo nastanitev potrebna dolgo; (d) so podnebne razmere skrajne z zelo mrzlim vremenom pozimi in zelo visokimi temperaturami poleti.
THERE WERE SHORTCOMINGS IN THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND ... 
OCENA POTREB JE BILA POMANJKLJIVA, POLEG TEGA PA ...
The Department of Civil Protection, assisted by international experts, including an EU civil protection team of Member States’ experts, assessed the damage to buildings rapidly after the event. 
Služba civilne zaščite je ob pomoči mednarodnih strokovnjakov, vključno z ekipo civilne zaščite, sestavljeno iz strokovnjakov iz držav članic, ocenila škodo na stavbah zelo hitro po potresu.
One month after the earthquake, the Department of Civil Protection considered that its estimate of the total number of unsafe buildings was reliable16. 
Mesec dni po njem je služba menila, da je njena ocena skupnega števila stavb, ki niso varne, zanesljiva16.
The local authorities’ records were not suitable for an assessment of the actual accommodation needs of displaced people. 
Evidence lokalnih organov so bile neprimerne za oceno dejanskih nastanitvenih potreb razseljenih oseb.
In order to implement the CASE project sufficiently quickly, procurement therefore had to start before this information became available. 
Zaradi dovolj hitre izvedbe projekta CASE se je moralo javno naročanje začeti, preden so bile te informacije na voljo.
The actual accommodation needs were finally identified on the basis of a census carried out at the beginning of August 2009, i.e. four months after the earthquake and more than two months after the contracts for the construction of CASE housing had been awarded. 
Dejanske nastanitvene potrebe so bile končno ugotovljene s popi-som, izvedenim v začetku avgusta 2009, tj. štiri mesece po potresu in več kot dva meseca po oddaji javnih naročil za gradnjo stanovanj CASE.
The census provided reliable information on the actual needs of the population, as it also provided information on the people’s preferences concerning temporary accommodation ar-rangements17 and led to the subsequent construction of 19 additional apartment blocks18. 
Popis je zagotovil zanesljive informacije o dejanskih potrebah prebivalstva, saj je zagotovil tudi informacije o tem, kakšne začasne nastanitve so ljudem ljubše17, in nato privedel do gradnje dodatnih 19 stanovanjskih blokov18.
17 Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
17 Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
As the data concerning displaced population were not available on a timely basis, it was only on the basis of the census in August 2009 that it became clear that the housing needs exceeded the planned number of apartments, which had to be assigned on the basis of priority criteria. 
Podatki o razseljenem prebivalstvu niso bili na voljo pravočasno, zato se je šele pri popisu avgusta 2009 pokazalo, da potrebe po bivališčih presegajo načrtovano število stanovanj, ki jih je bilo treba dodeliti na podlagi prednostnih meril.
Table 3 shows the number of families requesting temporary housing and the number of available CASE apartments. 
V tabeli 3 je prikazano število družin, ki so zaprosile za začasno nastanitev, in število razpoložljivih stanovanj CASE.
According to these data, requests for a CASE apartment could not be met for 4 294 families, or around 8 800 people. 
Sodeč po teh podatkih prošnjam za stanovanje CASE ni bilo mogoče ugoditi za 4 294 družin oziroma okoli 8 800 ljudi.
Although the number of CASE blocks was increased from 150 to 185, in April 2012 there were still 11 292 people receiving lumps sums for rent at a monthly cost of more than 3 million euro, 162 people living in hotels and 142 in Guardia di Finanza barracks19. 
Čeprav se je število blokov CASE povečalo s 150 na 185, je aprila 2012 še vedno 11 292 ljudi prejemalo pavšalne zneske za najemnino, kar je mesečno stalo več kot 3 milijone EUR, 162 ljudi je živelo v hotelih in 142 v stavbah finančne policije (Guardia di Finanza)19.
18 TABLE 3 FAMILIES REQUESTING AND HOUSED IN CASE APARTMENTS Total Requesting CASE accommodation Assigned a CASE apartment Families assessed 15 752 8 715 4 421 With more than 6 members 69 49 26 With 6 members 202 168 120 With 5 members 708 536 408 With 4 members 2 407 1 750 1 309 With 3 members 3 046 1 998 1 486 With 2 members 3 883 2 203 935 With 1 member 5 437 2 011 137 Source: Department of Civil Protection. 
18 TABELA 3 DRUŽINE, KI SO PROSILE ZA STANOVANJA CASE IN KI SO JIM BILA DODELJENA Skupaj Prošnja za stanovanje CASE Dodelitev stanovanja CASE Ocenjene družine 15 752 8 715 4 421 Z več kot 6 člani 69 49 26 S 6 člani 202 168 120 S 5 člani 708 536 408 S 4 člani 2 407 1 750 1 309 S 3 člani 3 046 1 998 1 486 Z 2 članoma 3 883 2 203 935 Z 1 članom 5 437 2 011 137 Vir: Služba civilne zaščite.
MOST OF THE APARTMENTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE BEFORE WINTER 27. 
VEČINA STANOVANJ NI BILA NA VOLJO PRED ZIMO 27.
The aim of accommodating the population in apartments before the winter (see paragraph 21) was not completely achieved. 
Cilj nastanitve prebivalcev v stanovanjih pred zimo (glej odstavek 21) ni bil v celoti dosežen.