natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The budgetary appropriations are allocated to the Member States based on two criteria: (a) the first is the needs communicated by the Member States plus the administrative costs (1 %) and the transport costs (4 % and 4,5 % from 2008); and (b) the second is the population considered ‘at risk of poverty’, as a percentage of the entire population of each Member State. 
Proračunska sredstva se dodelijo državam članicam na podlagi dveh meril: (a) prvo merilo so potrebe, ki jih sporočijo države članice, skupaj z upravnimi (1 %) in prevoznimi stroški (4 % in 4,5 % od leta 2008) in (b) drugo merilo je število prebivalcev, za katere se šteje, da živijo „na robu revščine“, kot delež celotnega prebivalstva vsake države članice.
Taking into consideration both criteria the final allocations to the Member States are adjusted to the available budgetary appropriations. 
Ob upoštevanju obeh meril se končne dodelitve državam članicam prilagodijo razpoložljivim odobrenim proračunskim sredstvom.
However, the second criterion does not necessarily result in the most effective use of the resources over the EU as a whole. 
Vendar drugo merilo nima nujno za posledico najuspešnejše uporabe sredstev v EU kot celoti.
Those classified under this category in a relatively high income country are likely to be better off than many people falling outside the classification in countries with low income per capita. 
Osebe, ki so uvrščene v to kategorijo v državi z relativno visokim dohodkom, so verjetno na boljšem kot številni drugi, ki ne spadajo v to razvrstitev v državah z nizkim dohodkom na prebivalca.
29 In one Member State, the auditors also found errors in the number of recipients communicated by the charitable organisations. 
29 V eni državi članici so revizorji odkrili napake tudi pri številu prejemnikov, ki so ga sporočile dobrodelne organizacije.
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Regulation30 that Member States’ reports on the execution of the annual plans are taken into consideration when allocating resources among the Member States, the Court found evidence that this had been done in only one case. 
Čeprav uredba30 določa, da se pri dodeljevanju sredstev državam članicam upoštevajo poročila o izvrševanju letnih načrtov, je Sodišče dokaz o tem našlo samo v enem primeru.
Additionally, the criteria used to allocate resources do not consider elements of the population not included in the statistical definition, e.g. non-registered immigrants and refugees. 
Poleg tega se v merilih, ki se uporabljajo za dodeljevanje sredstev, ne upoštevajo deli prebivalstva, ki niso vključeni v statistično opredelitev, npr. neprijavljeni priseljenci in begunci.
With regard to the annual needs notified to the Commission by the Member States, in general they are estimations fixed at the higher level of the managing bodies, without necessarily consulting the charitable organisations involved. 
Kar zadeva letne potrebe, ki jih države članice sporočijo Komisiji, so to na splošno ocene, določene na višji ravni upravnih organov, ki se ne posvetujejo nujno s sodelujočimi dobrodelnimi organizacijami.
This means that the resources requested are not based on real needs and rather reflect anticipated possible allocations. 
To pomeni, da zahtevana sredstva ne temeljijo na dejanskih potrebah in bolj izražajo pričakovane možne dodelitve.
30 Article 2(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 stipulates that for the purposes of allocating the resources among Member States, the Commission shall take account of the best estimates of the number of most deprived persons in the Member States concerned and of how operations were carried out and the uses to which resources were put in previous financial years, on the basis in particular of the reports provided for in Article 10 of the same Regulation. 
30 Člen 2(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3149/92 določa, da Komisija pri dodelitvi sredstev med državami članicami upošteva najboljše ocene števila najbolj ogroženih oseb v zadevni državi članici, kakor tudi pridobljene izkušnje in uporabo sredstev v preteklih letih, zlasti na podlagi poročil, določenih v členu 10 iste uredbe.
26 BOX 12 Year 2006 2007 2008 Number of participating Member States 15 18 19 Estimated needs (million euro) 307,2 338,7 313,9 Allocated financial resources (million euro) 259,4 258,9* 294,5** Percentage 84 % 76,4 % 93,8 % NEEDS AND ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES The needs are expressed in quantities of products in intervention stocks and their value is estimated by the Commission using the buying-in price. 
26 OKVIR 12 Leto 2006 2007 2008 Število sodelujočih držav članic 15 18 19 Predvidene potrebe (v milijonih EUR) 307,2 338,7 313,9 Dodeljena finančna sredstva (v milijonih EUR) 259,4 258,9* 294,5** Delež 84 % 76,4 % 93,8 % POTREBE IN DODELJEVANJE SREDSTEV Potrebe so izražene v količinah proizvodov iz intervencijskih zalog, Komisija pa oceni njihovo vrednost na podlagi odkupne cene.
The table below shows the needs expressed by the participating Member States in financial terms and the total financial resources made available by the Commission (administrative and transport cost included). 
V spodnji tabeli so prikazane potrebe, ki so jih izrazile sodelujoče države članice v finančnem smislu, in skupna finančna sredstva, ki jih je dala na voljo Komisija (vključno z upravnimi in prevoznimi stroški).
Needs of Member States compared to allocations: * Initial allocation. ** Before the increase of the allocation by 10 million euro decided in February 2008. 
Potrebe držav članic v primerjavi z dodelitvami: * Prvotna dodelitev. ** Pred povečanjem dodelitve za 10 milijonov EUR, sprejete februarja 2008.
The Court compared the needs notified by the Member States with the financial allocations made and also analysed (see Annex IV) the quantities of products in intervention stocks requested, as needed for the implementation of the plans, and those allocated by the Commission. 
Sodišče je primerjalo potrebe, ki so jih sporočile države članice, s finančnimi dodelitvami in analiziralo (glej Prilogo IV) tudi zahtevane količine proizvodov iz intervencijskih zalog, kot so bile potrebne za izvajanje načrtov, in tiste, ki jih je dodelila Komisija.
The amounts allocated in the last 3 years were lower than requested (see Box 12). 
Zneski, dodeljeni v zadnjih treh letih, so bili nižji od zahtevanih (glej okvir 12).
In relation to products and quantities, the Member States very often did not obtain what they demanded. 
Kar zadeva proizvode in količine, države članice zelo pogosto niso dobile tega, za kar so zaprosile.
In addition certain Member States were allocated products they initially did not request (e.g. butter and sugar in 2006 and 2007) and were not allocated products they did request (e.g. rice and butter in 2007). 
Poleg tega so bili nekaterim državam članicam dodeljeni proizvodi, ki jih prvotno niso zahtevale (npr. maslo in sladkor v letih 2006 in 2007), niso pa jim bili dodeljeni zahtevani proizvodi (npr. riž in maslo v letu 2007).
This calls into question the effectiveness of the programme in meeting expected needs. 
Zaradi tega je vprašljiva uspešnost programa pri zadovoljevanju pričakovanih potreb.
For the procurement of the final products to be distributed, the competent national authorities are required to issue an invitation to tender. 
Za nabavo končnih proizvodov za razdeljevanje morajo pristojni organi objaviti javni razpis.
This procedure is valid for the two main types of supplies necessary for the implementation of the plan: (a) products withdrawn from intervention stocks in unprocessed form or after packaging and/or processing; and (b) final products mobilised on the market and paid for either in the form of products withdrawn from intervention stocks (bartering) or in monetary value. 
Ta postopek se uporablja za obe glavni vrsti dobave, potrebni za izvajanje načrta: (a) za proizvode, umaknjene iz intervencijskih zalog v nepredelani obliki ali po pakiranju in/ali predelavi, ter (b) za končne proizvode, kupljene na trgu in plačane bodisi v obliki proizvodov, umaknjenih iz intervencijskih zalog (blagovna menjava), bodisi z denarjem.
The Court analysed the procedures applied for the procurement of the final products to be supplied to charitable organisations for distribution in the Member States audited and examined a sample of tenders organised in the last years both for using products available in the intervention stocks and for direct purchase of products on the market. 
Sodišče je analiziralo postopke, uporabljene za nabavo končnih proizvodov, ki jih je treba dostaviti dobrodelnim organizacijam za razdeljevanje v revidiranih državah članicah, in preučilo vzorec razpisov, organiziranih v zadnjih letih tako za uporabo proizvodov, ki so na voljo v intervencijskih zalogah, kot za neposreden nakup izdelkov na trgu.
Certain regulatory requirements concerning the tendering procedures to be applied are set in Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 (e.g. type of products to be mobilised on the market, content of the invitation to tender, restrictions, etc.). 
Nekatere zakonodajne zahteve glede razpisnih postopkov, ki jih je treba uporabljati, so določene v Uredbi (EGS) št. 3149/92 (npr. vrsta proizvodov, ki jih je treba kupiti na trgu, vsebina razpisa, omejitve itd.).
The same Regulation requires that invitations to tender shall guarantee equal access to all operators established in the Community. 
Ista uredba zahteva, da morajo razpisi zagotavljati enak dostop vsem dobaviteljem s sedežem v Skupnosti.
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council31 establishes the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts. 
V Direktivi 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta31 je predpisano usklajevanje postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil za gradnjo, blago in storitve.
In addition specific Community Regulations are in force for the sale of products held by intervention agencies32. 
Poleg tega veljajo za prodajo proizvodov iz intervencijskih agencij32 posebne uredbe Skupnosti.
However, neither Regulation (EEC) No 3730/87 nor Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92, as regularly amended, make any precise reference to the legal basis for the tenders to be organised by the Member States. 
3730/87 niti Uredba (EGS) št. 3149/92, kakor se redno spreminjata, ne sklicujeta natančno na pravno podlago za javne razpise, ki jih organizirajo države članice.
The Court’s auditors found that tendering procedures are organised by all Member States audited. 
Revizorji Sodišča so ugotovili, da vse revidirane države članice organizirajo razpisne postopke.
Member States carry out the tendering procedures on the basis of the national legislation under conditions which do not always guarantee the transparency and equal access of operators at EU level. 
Države članice izvajajo razpisne postopke na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje pod pogoji, ki ne zagotavljajo vedno preglednosti in enakega dostopa vsem dobaviteljem na ravni EU.
IT IS ECONOMICALLY MORE ADVANTAGEOUS TO BUY THE PRODUCTS ON THE MARKET THAN TO USE INTERVENTION STOCKS AS A PROXY FOR PAYMENTS 65. 
KUPOVANJE PROIZVODOV NA TRGU JE EKONOMSKO UGODNEJŠE, KOT ČE SE ZA PLAČILO UPORABLJAJO INTERVENCIJSKE ZALOGE 65.
The Court found that, in general, more advantageous prices are obtained in cases of direct purchase of products on the market, compared with using intervention stocks as a proxy for payment for the same products at the same time. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se ob neposrednem nakupu proizvodov na trgu na splošno dosegajo ugodnejše cene, kot če se kot nadomestilo za plačilo za iste proizvode ob istem času uporabijo intervencijske zaloge.
For example, in 2007 in Poland, under the same tender procedure companies were invited to submit their bids for delivery of a product (a) in exchange for butter from intervention stocks and (b) via direct purchase. 
Leta 2007 so bila na primer podjetja na Poljskem v okviru istega razpisnega postopka pozvana, naj oddajo svoje ponudbe za dobavo proizvoda (a) v zameno za maslo iz intervencijskih zalog in (b) prek neposrednega nakupa.
The comparison of the results shows that the price for the direct purchase was lower by about 10 %33. 
Primerjava rezultatov kaže, da je bila cena pri neposrednem nakupu nižja za približno 10 %33.
31 OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 
31 UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str.
32 E.g. 
32 Npr. Uredba Komisije (EGS) št.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 of 28 July 1993 laying down the procedures and conditions for the sale of cereals held by intervention agencies (OJ L 191, 31.7.1993, p. 
2131/93 z dne 28. julija 1993 o postopku in pogojih prodaje žit iz intervencijskih agencij (UL L 191, 31.7.1993, str.
33 The ratio for exchange transactions reached 85 %, while the ratio for direct purchase is estimated at 94 %. 28 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 
33 Delež menjalnih poslov je znašal 85 %, delež neposrednih nakupov pa je ocenjen na 94 %. 28 Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 – Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
The Commission has detailed information on the market price of products in the context of the intervention mechanism34. 
Komisija ima podrobne informacije o tržnih cenah proizvodov v okviru intervencijskega mehanizma34.
However, in the context of the food programme for deprived persons the governing rules35 do not foresee that the competent services of the Commission are informed about the prices and conditions achieved by the tendering procedures taking place in the Member States. 
Vendar v okviru programa hrane za ogrožene osebe veljavna pravila35 ne določajo, da morajo biti pristojne službe Komisije obveščene o cenah in pogojih, doseženih v razpisnih postopkih, ki so potekali v državah članicah.
As a result the Commission has no assurance that the most advantageous terms have been obtained. 
Komisija zato nima nobenega zagotovila, da so bili doseženi najugodnejši pogoji.
TENDER PROCEDURES APPLIED BY THE MEMBER STATES DIFFER CONSIDERABLY 67. 
RAZPISNI POSTOPKI, KI JIH UPORABLJAJO DRŽAVE ČLANICE, SE ZELO RAZLIKUJEJO 67.
The Court found that national rather than EU tendering procedures are applied, with the result that they differ considerably between Member States and even within the same Member State, where more than one service is responsible for organising the tenders (Italy, France). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se bolj uporabljajo nacionalni razpisni postopki kot razpisni postopki EU, zaradi česar se ti postopki zelo razlikujejo med državami članicami in celo znotraj iste države članice, v kateri je za organizacijo razpisov odgovorna več kot ena služba (v Italiji, Franciji).
In certain instances EU provisions are not respected. 
V nekaterih primerih se določbe EU ne spoštujejo.
The differences concern important points of the tendering procedure such as the publicity given to the invitations to tender, the deadline for the submission of the offers, the guarantee lodged for the participation of the tenderers, the minimum number of participants and the evaluation methods and criteria used for awarding the contract (see Box 13). 
Razlike se nanašajo na pomembne točke razpisnih postopkov, kot so oglaševanje javnih razpisov, rok za oddajo ponudb, vložena garancija za sodelovanje ponudnikov, najmanjše število sodelujočih ter ocenjevalne metode in merila, ki se uporabljajo za oddajo naročila (glej okvir 13).
34 The Commission follows and analyses market prices for a number of products in the context of adopting the invitation to tender procedures for the sale of agricultural products held by intervention agencies and the fixing of the minimum sale prices to be adopted by the corresponding management committee. 
34 Komisija spremlja in analizira tržne cene za številne proizvode v okviru sprejemanja postopkov javnih razpisov za prodajo kmetijskih izdelkov iz intervencijskih agencij in določanja najnižjih prodajnih cen, ki jih sprejme ustrezen upravljalni odbor.
Market prices are also published by Eurostat regularly. 
Tržne cene redno objavlja tudi Eurostat.
35 The obligation of the Member States to send the Commission the models of the invitations to tender (Article 4(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92) was abolished by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1127/2007 (OJ L 255, 29.9.2007, p. 
35 Obveznost držav članic, da Komisiji pošljejo vzorce javnih razpisov (člen 4(4) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3149/92), je bila ukinjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1127/2007 (UL L 255, 29.9.2007, str.
29 BOX 13 Spain France36 Italy37 Poland Publication in OJ No Yes PA1: Yes PA2: No No Submission deadline (days) 15 PA1: 22 PA2: 45 PA1: 8–19 PA2: 10 20 Participation guarantee 2% PA1: 5 % PA2: 5 euro/tonne PA1: 10 % PA2: 15 euro/tonne 50 000 PLN (14 200 euro) Minimum number of participants No No Yes (2) No Number of tenderers 1–5 PA1: 6–7 PA2: 3–4 2–4 1–9 Evaluation of prices vs. market No PA1: No PA2: Yes Acceptable prices/ quantities are indicated in the invitation to tender No DIFFERENCES IN TENDER PROCEDURES AND CONDITIONS BETWEEN MEMBER STATES AUDITED 36 France: Paying Agency 1: ONIEP (Office National Interprofessionnel de l’Élevage et de ses Productions); Paying Agency 2: ONIGC (Office National Interprofessionnel des Grandes Cultures). 
29 OKVIR 13 Španija Francija36 Italija37 PA1: Da PA2: Ne Poljska Objava v UL Ne Da Ne Rok za oddajo ponudb (št. dni) 15 PA1: 22 PA2: 45 PA1: 8–19 PA2: 10 20 Garancija za sodelovanje 2% PA1: 5 % PA2: 5 EUR/tono PA1: 10 % PA2: 15 EUR/tono 50 000 PLN (14 200 EUR) Najmanjše število sodelujočih Ne Ne Da (2) Ne Število ponudnikov 1–5 PA1: 6–7 PA2: 3–4 2–4 1–9 Ocena cen v primerjavi s trgom Ne PA1: Ne PA2: Da V javnem razpisu so navedene sprejemljive cene/ količine Ne RAZLIKE V RAZPISNIH POSTOPKIH IN POGOJIH MED REVIDIRANIMI DRŽAVAMI ČLANICAMI 36 Francija: plačilna agencija 1 ONIEP (Office National Interprofessionnel de l’Élevage et de ses Productions); plačilna agencija 2 ONIGC (Office National Interprofessionnel des Grandes Cultures).
37 Italy: Paying Agency 1: AGEA (Agencia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura); Paying Agency 2: Ente Nazionale Risi. 
37 Italija: plačilna agencija 1: AGEA (Agencia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura); plačilna agencija 2: Ente Nazionale Risi.
The auditors found weaknesses in the tender procedures examined, such as limited publicity of the tender invitations, low number of participants — which in some cases was just one — short time given between publication and the closing date for the submission of offer. 
Revizorji so v preučenih razpisnih postopkih odkrili slabosti, kot so omejeno oglaševanje javnih razpisov, majhno število sodelujočih – v nekaterih primerih samo eden – in kratek čas med objavo in rokom za oddajo ponudb.
Additionally, the evaluation of the offers and the award of contracts are based principally on comparative data of the offers received, with no systematic comparison with other sources of information such as market prices. 
Poleg tega ocenjevanje ponudb in oddaja naročil temeljita predvsem na primerjalnih podatkih iz prejetih ponudb, ki se ne primerjajo sistematično z drugimi viri informacij, kot so tržne cene.
As such, the processes followed do not ensure the openness of the tenders, the broadest competition and that the best conditions and prices are obtained. 
Uporabljeni postopki zato ne zagotavljajo odprtosti javnih razpisov, najširše konkurence in doseganja najboljših pogojev in cen.
An analysis of the tenders examined in certain Member States has shown that the contracts for several products were awarded to a limited number of companies over several years. 
Analiza preučenih javnih razpisov v nekaterih državah članicah je pokazala, da so se naročila za več proizvodov več let oddajala omejenemu številu podjetij.
The abovementioned examples illustrate the risk that the most advantageous conditions are not achieved, particularly when bartering arrangements are applied. 
Zgoraj navedeni primeri ponazarjajo tveganje, da niso doseženi najugodnejši pogoji, zlasti če se uporablja blagovna menjava.
In such cases, two constraining factors apply: (a) the nature of the bartering arrangements limit the number of parties potentially interested in participating; and (b) the evaluation of the offers is difficult insofar as the paying agency cannot easily determine the expected yields which could be considered acceptable. 
V takih primerih se uporabljata dva omejevalna dejavnika: (a) narava blagovne menjave omejuje število strank, ki bi jih morda zanimalo sodelovanje, in (b) težavno je vrednotiti ponudbe, saj plačilna agencija ne more zlahka opredeliti pričakovanih rezultatov, ki bi jih bilo mogoče šteti za sprejemljive.
REFORM PROPOSAL: A RECENT COMMISSION INITIATIVE AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROGRAMME 71. 
PREDLOG REFORME: NEDAVNA POBUDA KOMISIJE IN OCENA UČINKA PROGRAMA 71.
A detailed analysis of the scheme was undertaken by the Commission starting in February 2008 for the preparation of a proposal for the reform of the programme. 
Komisija je februarja 2008 začela izvajati podrobno analizo programa, da bi pripravila predlog za reformo programa.
An inter-service steering group was set up, whereby 17 directorates-general were invited to participate, and a broad consultation with the Member States, the charitable organisations, academic experts in the field and a public online survey took place. 
Ustanovljena je bila medresorska usmerjevalna skupina, k sodelovanju v kateri je bilo povabljenih 17 generalnih direktoratov, organizirano je bilo obsežno posvetovanje z državami članicami, dobrodelnimi organizacijami in akademskimi strokovnjaki s tega področja, poleg tega pa je bila izvedena tudi javna spletna anketa.
As a result the Commission adopted in September 2008 a proposal for the amendment of the Council Regulation38 and published an impact assessment report on the scheme. 
Komisija je nato septembra 2008 sprejela predlog za spremembo uredbe Sveta38 in objavila poročilo o oceni učinka za ta program.
This is expected to lead to a new legal framework for the 2010 programme. 
Po pričakovanjih bo to pripeljalo do novega pravnega okvira za program za leto 2010.
The main elements of the Commission proposals are: (a) two sources of supply: intervention stocks or products directly purchased from the market, with priority given to the use of suitable intervention stocks; (b) wider variety of foods to be distributed: the products distributed would no longer be limited to those for which intervention applies; (c) long-term perspective: in order to enhance its efficiency, the Community food distribution plan would be established for a three year period; (d) clearer priorities: Member States would base their aid requests on national food distribution programmes, setting out their objectives and priorities; (e) co-financing: the introduction of co-financing would underpin the cohesion dimension of the scheme, ensure proper planning and reinforce synergies between the various actors; (f) reinforcing monitoring and reporting: reporting obligations at various levels would be increased. 
Glavni elementi predlogov Komisije so: (a) dva vira dobave: intervencijske zaloge ali proizvodi, ki se kupijo neposredno na trgu, pri čemer se daje prednost uporabi ustreznih intervencijskih zalog; (b) večja raznovrstnost živil za razdeljevanje: razdeljeni proizvodi ne bi bili več omejeni na tiste, za katere se uporablja intervencija; (c) dolgoročna usmeritev: za povečanje učinkovitosti programa Skupnosti za razdeljevanje hrane bi se ta oblikoval za tri leta; (d) jasnejše prednostne naloge: države članice bi svoje zahtevke za pomoč utemeljile na nacionalnih programih razdeljevanja hrane, v katerih bi navedle svoje cilje in prednostne naloge; (e) sofinanciranje: z uvedbo sofinanciranja bi se podprla kohezijska razsežnost programa, zagotovilo ustrezno načrtovanje in okrepile sinergije med različnimi akterji; (f) krepitev spremljanja in poročanja: povečale bi se obveznosti poročanja na različnih ravneh.