natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C 344/144 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S — For the TEN-T programme, strict compliance with the eligibility requirements is insisted upon throughout the funding process, for example, the guide for applicants contains clear instructions on the respect of these requirements. 
C 344/144 Uradni list Evropske unije 12.11.2012 O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E — Pri programu TEN-T vztraja na strogem izpolnjevanju zahtev za upravičenost v celotnem postopku financiranja; navodila za prijavo, na primer, vsebujejo jasne napotke glede spoštovanja teh zahtev.
The respect of these rules is then checked through the sampling controls when making intermediate and final payments. 
Spoštovanje teh pravil nato pri vmesnih in končnih plačilih preveri s kontrolnimi vzorčenji.
The Commission has been giving guidelines to the Member States on the way managing authorities should define and implement their management verifications. 
Komisija je dajala smernice državam članicam o tem, kako naj bi organi upravljanja opredelili in izvajali svoje upravne preglede.
Moreover, the Commission developed in 2009 comprehensive guidelines for the first level checks and a self-assessment tool for managing authorities, which they can use to improve their func­ tioning. 
Poleg tega je Komisija v letu 2009 pripravila izčrpne smernice za preglede na prvi stopnji ter orodje za samoocenjevanje za organe upravljanja, ki jih ti lahko uporabljajo za izboljšanje svojega delova­ nja.
The Commission has also developed and disseminated in 2011 to audit authorities checklists for the audit of management verifications which can be used by the managing authorities them­ selves, as a benchmark. — Since the beginning of the programming period, the Commission has provided detailed and technical guidance, offered training and conducted technical meetings with auditors of national audit authorities. 
Komisija je za revizijske organe v letu 2011 tudi pripravila in jim poslala kontrolne sezname za revizijo upravnih pregledov, ki jih lahko kot merilo uporabljajo tudi organi upravljanja. — Komisija od začetka programskega obdobja zagotavlja natančna in tehnična navodila ter usposabljanje in vodi tehnične sestanke z revizorji nacionalnih revizijskih organov.
Furthermore, guidance on the scope and extent of audits on operations that was delivered under the 2000-2006 programming period is still valid since such audits do not differ significantly between both programming periods. 
Navodila za področje uporabe in obseg revizij operacij, oblikovana v okviru program­ skega obdobja 2000–2006, še vedno veljajo, saj se te revizije v obeh programskih obdobjih bistveno ne razlikujejo.
As far as sampling is concerned, a specific workshop was organised by the Commission in June 2012. — The Commission is actively implementing this recommendation and will continue to do so. 
Glede vzor­ čenja je Komisija junija 2012 organizirala posebno delavnico. — Komisija aktivno uvaja to priporočilo in bo to še naprej počela.
When the Commission identifies weaknesses in management verifications (through various audit results at national or Community level), it requests the audit authority to review its audit strategy and audit plan to include targeted audits on management verifications or, alternatively, following revised risk assessments, it carries out directly such audits (under its audit enquiry ‘bridging the assurance gap’). 
Če Komisija (z rezultati različnih revizij na nacionalni ravni ali na ravni Skupnosti) odkrije slabosti pri upravnih pregledih, od revizijskega organa zahteva, da pregleda svojo revizijsko strategijo in revizijski načrt, in vanju vključi ciljane revizije upravnih pregledov ali da z upoštevanjem revidiranih ocen tveganja take revizije izvede neposredno (v okviru svoje revizijske poizvedbe „premoščanje vrzeli v zagotovilu“).
Moreover, based on an assessment of the functioning of management verification across all co-financed programmes based on all audit results available, the Commission has encouraged audit authorities in October 2011 to pay particular attention in their systems audits to first level checks (cf. Homo­ logues Group, dedicated workshop on the role of audit authorities to contribute to improvement of management verifications). 
Poleg tega je Komisija na osnovi ocene delovanja upravnih pregledov v vseh sofinanciranih programih, ki je temeljila na vseh razpoložljivih rezultatih revizij, oktobra 2011 spodbudila revizijske organe, naj bodo v svojih revizijah sistemov še posebej pozorni na preverjanja na prvi stopnji (prim. skupino Homologues (skupino nacionalnih revi­ zorjev in revizorjev Skupnosti) – to je delavnica, posvečena vlogi revizijskih organov pri prispevanju k izboljšavam upravnih pregledov).
EN — Recommendation 3: addresses weaknesses in ‘first level checks’ at the level of managing authorities and inter­ mediate bodies for ERDF and CF, where appropriate through training measures and specific guidance material. — Recommendation 4: regarding the control system for audit authorities in the cohesion area: — provides further guidance to AAs for the current programming period, in particular on sampling, the scope of verifications to be undertaken for audits of projects and quality control, — encourages AAs to carry out specific system audits concerning ‘first level checks’ done by managing auth­ orities and intermediate bodies. 
SL U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A — priporočilo 3: obravnava slabosti v „pregledih na prvi stopnji“ na ravni organov upravljanja in posredniških teles za ESRR in KS z ukrepi usposabljanja in specifičnimi navodili, kjer je ustrezno, — priporočilo 4: v zvezi s kontrolnim sistemom za revizijske organe na področju kohezije: — revizijskim organom zagotovi dodatno usmerjanje za tekoče programsko obdobje, zlasti glede vzorčenja, obsega preverjanj, ki jih je treba izvesti pri reviziji projektov, in obvladovanja kakovosti, — spodbuja revizijske organe k izvajanju posebnih revizij sistemov v zvezi s „pregledi na prvi stopnji“, ki jih izvajajo organi upravljanja in posredniška telesa,
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/145 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S — Recommendation 5: in order to make the procedure for closing multiannual programmes in the area of cohesion more efficient: — reminds the Member States to ensure that the final declarations submitted for the 2007-2013 programmes are reliable, — examines the specific weaknesses identified by the Court in the winding-up declarations for closures of 2000-2006 programmes, — considers whether these problems have also occurred for other OPs, and apply financial corrections where necessary, — ensures that ongoing closure audits adequately address the issues raised by the Court. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/145 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A — priporočilo 5: za učinkovitejši postopek zaključevanja večletnih programov na področju kohezije: — države članice opomni, naj poskrbijo, da bodo končne izjave, predložene za programe iz obdobja 2007–2013, zanesljive, — preuči specifične slabosti, ki jih je Sodišče odkrilo v izjavah o zaključku pri zaključevanju programov iz obdobja 2000–2006, — razmisli, ali so se te težave pojavile tudi pri drugih operativnih programih, in po potrebi uporabi finančne popravke, — poskrbi, da se pri tekočih zaključnih revizijah ustrezno obravnavajo zadeve, na katere je opozorilo Sodišče.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S — The 2007-2013 regulatory framework foresees quite different requirements for the audit of representative, statistical sample on a yearly basis, that support formal audit opinions of the audit authorities. This will form a more solid basis for closure declarations, which will allow identifying the residual risk after all corrections were taken during programme implementation. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E — Regulatorni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 za letno revizijo reprezentativnega, statističnega vzorca določa precej drugačne zahteve, ki podpirajo uradna revizijska mnenja revizijskih orga­ nov. S tem bo oblikovana trdnejša osnova za izjave o zaključku pomoči, kar bo omogočilo odkrivanje preostalega tveganja, potem ko bodo med izvedbo programa uvedeni vsi popravki.
It should also be noted that guidelines for closure 2007-2013 were already presented to Member States during the COCOF meeting in June 2012. — These weaknesses were identified and addressed by the Commis­ sion. — More generally, the Commission analyses thoroughly each winding-up declaration and draws conclusions, including appli­ cation of financial corrections where necessary. — The Commission is confident that its closure process will allow applying appropriate financial corrections at closure, when needed, once its services will have carried out the required assessments of all closure documents received and additional information requested, and taking into account the evidence gathered during the closure audits. 
Treba je tudi omeniti, da so bile smernice za zaključek pomoči za obdobje 2007–2013 že predstavljene državam članicam na srečanju Odbora za usklajevanje skladov (COCOF) junija 2012. — Te slabosti je odkrila in obravnavala Komisija. — V splošnem Komisija podrobno analizira vsako izjavo o zaključku pomoči in zasnuje zaključke, vključno z uporabo finančnih popravkov, kjer je to potrebno. — Komisija je prepričana, da bo njen proces zaključevanja omogočal uporabo ustreznih finančnih popravkov ob zaključevanju, kjer bo to potrebno, potem ko bodo njene službe izvedle ustrezne ocene vseh prejetih zaključnih dokumentov in zahtevanih dodatnih informacij ter upoštevale dokaze, zbrane med zaključnimi revizi­ jami.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/151 CHAPTER 6 Employment and social affairs TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 6.1-6.12 Specific characteristics of the policy group Policy objectives Policy instruments Risks to regularity Audit scope and approach Regularity of transactions Effectiveness of systems In-depth examination of two audit authorities (AAs) Assessment of the Commission's supervision of AAs Reliability of Commission management representations Conclusions and recommendations Conclusions Recommendations Paragraph 6.3-6.11 6.3 6.4-6.9 6.10-6.11 6.12 6.13-6.18 6.19-6.26 6.19-6.20 6.21-6.23 6.24-6.26 6.27-6.30 6.27-6.28 6.29-6.30 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/151 Uvod Posebne značilnosti te skupine politik Cilji politike Instrumenti politike Tveganja za pravilnost Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Pravilnost transakcij Uspešnost sistemov Odstavek 6.1–6.12 6.3–6.11 6.3 6.4–6.9 6.10–6.11 6.12 6.13–6.18 6.19–6.26 6.19–6.20 6.21–6.23 6.24–6.26 6.27–6.30 6.27–6.28 6.29–6.30 Poglobljen pregled dveh revizijskih organov Ocena nadzora Komisije nad revizijskimi organi Zanesljivost poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije Zaključki in priporočila Zaključki Priporočila POGLAVJE 6 Zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve KAZALO
EN C 344/152 Official Journal of the European Union T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 12.11.2012 INTRODUCTION 6.1. 
SL C 344/152 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A UVOD 6.1 VtempoglavjujepredstavljenaposebnaocenaSodišča o skupini politik 4 – zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve.
Key information on the activities covered and the spending in 2011 is provided in Table 6.1. 
Ključne informacije o vključenih dejavnostih in porabi v letu 2011 so v tabeli 6.1.
6.2. Employmentandsocialaffairspolicyismostlyfinanced through the European Social Fund (ESF), which is governed by the same rules as the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF) as described in Chapter 5. 
6.2 Politikazaposlovanjainsocialnihzadevsevečinoma financira iz Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS), za katerega veljajo ista pravila kot za Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) in Kohezijski sklad (KS), kot je opisano v poglavju 5.
Additional provisions for the ESF are set out in a specific regulation. 
Dodatne določbe za ESS so določene v posebni uredbi.
For issues common to all three funds, reference is made in this Chapter to Chapter 5. 
Zadeve, ki so skupne vsem trem skladom, so obravnavane v poglavju 5.
Table 6.1 — Employment and social affairs — Key information 2011 Budget (million euro) Policy area Description Payments Employment and social affairs Administrative expenditure European Social Fund Working in Europe — Social dialogue and mobility Employment, social solidarity and gender equality European Globalisation Adjustment Fund Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance 93 9 966 59 132 114 28 10 392 Title 04 Management mode Centralised direct Shared Centralised direct Centralised direct Shared Decentralised Total administrative expenditure (1) Total operational expenditure Of which: — advances — interim/final payments Total payments for the year Total commitments for the year 93 10 299 128 10 171 10 392 11 638 (1) The audit of administrative expenditure is reported in Chapter 9. 
Tabela 6.1 – Zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve – ključne informacije za leto 2011 12.11.2012 Področje politike Opis Plačila Zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve upravni odhodki Evropski socialni sklad delo v Evropi – socialni dialog in mobilnost zaposlovanje, socialna solidarnost in enakost med spoloma Evropski sklad za prilagajanje globalizaciji instrument za predpristopno pomoč 93 9 966 59 132 114 28 10 392 Prora­ čunski naslov 04 (v milijonih EUR) Način upravljanja neposredno centralizirano deljeno neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano deljeno decentralizirano upravni odhodki skupaj (1) operativni odhodki skupaj od tega: — predplačila — vmesna/končna plačila Plačila za leto skupaj Obveznosti za leto skupaj 93 10 299 128 10 171 10 392 11 638 (1) Revizija upravnih odhodkov je predstavljena v poglavju 9.
Source: 2011 annual accounts of the European Union. 
Vir: letni računovodski izkazi Evropske unije za leto 2011.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/153 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Specific characteristics of the policy group Policy objectives 6.3. Theemploymentandsocialaffairspolicygroupforms part of EU cohesion policy, which aims to reinforce economic, social and territorial cohesion within the EU by reducing the gap in the level of development between regions. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/153 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Posebne značilnosti te skupine politik Cilji politike 6.3 Skupinapolitikzaposlovanjeinsocialnezadevejedel kohezijske politike EU, ki je namenjena krepitvi ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije v EU z zmanjševanjem razvojnih razlik med regijami.
Specifically, the main objectives of EU employment and social policy are to combat unemployment, to develop human resources and to promote integration in the labour market. Policy instruments 6.4. 
Glavni cilji zaposlitvene in socialne politike EU so zlasti boj proti brezposelnosti, razvoj kadrovskih virov in spodbujanje vključevanja na trg delovne sile.
TheEuropeanSocialFund(ESF)isthemaintoolforthe implementation of employment and social policy, accounting for 97 % of the policy area spending in 2011. 
Instrumenti politike 6.4 Glavnosredstvozaizvajanjezaposlitveneinsocialne politike je Evropski socialni sklad (ESS), ki predstavlja 97 % porabe na tem področju politike v letu 2011.
The ESF funds investments in human capital through training and other employment measures. 
ESS financira vlaganja v človeški kapital z usposabljanjem in drugimi ukrepi za zaposlovanje.
6.5. Otherspendingtakestheformofsubsidiesandgrants to organisations implementing and coordinating social and employment actions. 
6.5 Drugiodhodkisosubvencijeindonacijeorganizacijam, ki izvajajo in usklajujejo socialne in zaposlitvene ukrepe.
This includes funding for the European Employment Services (EURES) network, which develops cooperation between the Commission and the Member States in the implementation of the European Employment Strategy, and the progress programme, which supports policy imple­ mentation in the Member States through studies, analysis and other measures. 6.6. 
To vključuje financiranje mreže evropskih služb za zaposlovanje (EURES), ki razvija sodelovanje med Komisijo in državami članicami pri izvajanju evropske strategije zaposlovanja, in programa PROGRESS, ki s študijami, analizo in drugimi ukrepi podpira izvajanje politike v državah članicah.
FundingisalsoprovidedtoEUAgencies:theEuropean Institute for Gender Equality, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. 6.7. 
6.6 FinanciranjesezagotavljatudizanaslednjeagencijeEU: Evropski inštitut za enakost spolov, Evropska fundacija za izboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih razmer ter Evropska agen­ cija za varnost in zdravje pri delu.
TheEuropeanGlobalisationAdjustmentFund(EGF) supports workers in the EU made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns and of the financial and economic crisis. 
6.7 Evropski sklad za prilagajanje globalizaciji (ESPG) podpira delavce v EU, ki so izgubili zaposlitev zaradi velikih strukturnih sprememb v svetovni trgovini ter zaradi finančne in gospodarske krize.
The Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) provides support to candidate countries in human resources development. 
Instrument za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) podpira države kandidatke pri razvoju kadrovskih virov.
The ESF is governed by the management and control systems for cohesion spending as a whole, as described in the previous chapter (paragraphs 5.8 to 5.14). 
Za ESS se uporabljajo upravljavski in kontrolni sistemi, ki se uporabljajo za celotno kohezijsko porabo, kot je opisano v prejšnjem poglavju (odstavki 5.8 do 5.14).
6.9. The EGF is also implemented through shared management. For EGF, the budgetary authority decides on the appropriations and, the Commission reviews the appli­ cations for funding submitted by Member States and approves the payments. 
6.9 TudiESPGseizvajazdeljenimupravljanjem.Pritem skladu proračunski organ odloča o odobrenih proračunskih srestvih, Komisija pa pregleda vloge držav članic za financi­ ranje in odobri plačila.
The IPA instrument is implemented through decentralised management while the other social and employment expenditure is implemented under direct centralised management. 
Instrument IPA se izvaja z decentrali­ ziranim upravljanjem, medtem ko se drugi odhodki za socialne in zaposlitvene ukrepe izvajajo z neposrednim centraliziranim upravljanjem.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 6.8. Although, as mentioned in paragraph 5.8, management and control systems for ESF, ERDF and CF are governed by common rules, in practice most ESF operational programmes have their own specific authorities and control systems. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 6.8 Čeprav upravljavske in kontrolne sisteme za ESS, ESRR in KS urejajo skupna pravila, kot je navedeno v odstavku 5.8, ima v praksi večina operativnih programov ESS svoje posebne organe in kontrolne sisteme.
EN C 344/154 Official Journal T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Risks to regularity 6.10. ThemainrisksforESFexpenditurearerelatedtothe intangible nature of the investments in human capital (such as training courses), the diversity of the co-financed activities and the involvement of multiple, often small-scale, partners in the implementation of projects. 
SL C 344/154 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A Tveganja za pravilnost 6.10 Glavna tveganja za odhodke ESS so povezana z neopredmetenostjo naložb v človeški kapital (kot so tečaji usposabljanja), raznolikostjo sofinanciranih dejavnosti in sode­ lovanjem več pogosto majhnih partnerjev pri izvajanju projek­ tov.
These factors lend themselves to ineligible costs being accepted or calculation errors affecting the accuracy of claims, which are then not detected by the systems in place. 6.11. 
Ti dejavniki prispevajo k temu, da so sprejeti neupravičeni stroški ali da na točnost zahtevka vplivajo napake pri izračunu, česar vzpostavljeni sistemi nato ne zaznajo.
For EGF, the principal risk is that the applications contain inaccurate information, which is not detected by the Commission during approval or in subsequent checks. 
6.11 GlavnotveganjezaESPGje,daprijavevsebujejo netočne podatke, česar Komisija pri odobritvi ali kasnejših pregledih ne ugotovi.
For IPA, the main risk is related to the ability of the candidate countries to set up and operate the necessary structures and controls. 
Glavno tveganje za IPA je povezano z zmožnostjo držav kandidatk, da vzpostavijo in upravljajo potrebne strukture in kontrole.
For the other social and employment spending, the main risk is that beneficiaries may include ineligible costs in their cost claims. Audit scope and approach 6.12. 
Za drugo porabo za socialne in zaposlitvene ukrepe pa je glavno tveganje, da upravičenci v svojih zahtevkih za povračilo stroškov navedejo neupravičene stroške.
For the audit of employment and social affairs, the following specific issues should be noted: (a) the audit involved examination of a sample of 180 interim and final payments; (b) the assessment of systems focused on two audit authorities (AAs) for the 2007-2013 programming period in cohesion; (c) the review of Commission management representations covered the Annual Activity Report of DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (DG EMPL). 
Glede revizije zapo­ slovanja in socialnih zadev je treba upoštevati naslednje poseb­ nosti: (a) pri reviziji je bil uporabljen vzorec 180 vmesnih in končnih plačil; (b) ocena sistemov na področju kohezije je bila osredotočena na dva revizijska organa za programsko obdobje 2007–2013; (c) pregled poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije je vključeval letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje (GD EMPL).
The most likely error estimated by the Court is 2,2 % (1). _____________ (1) The Court calculates its estimate of error from a representative statistical sample. 
Ocenjuje, da je najverjetnejša stopnja napake 2,2 % (1). _____________ (1) Sodišče svojo oceno napake izračuna na podlagi reprezentativnega statističnega vzorca.
The figure quoted is the best estimate (known as the MLE). 
Navedeni številčni podatek je najboljša ocena (znana kot najverjetnejša stopnja napake).
The Court has 95 % confidence that the rate of error in the population lies between LEL 0,9 % and UEL 3,4 % (the lower and upper error limits respectively). of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 6.10. The Commission has taken specific actions in order to mitigate the risks identified, which include in particular preventive and corrective measures, such as guidance, training, and interruptions of payments. 
Sodišče je 95-odstotno prepričano, da je stopnja napake v populaciji med 0,9 % in 3,4 % (spodnja in zgornja meja napake). 12.11.2012 O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E Komisija je sprejela posebne ukrepe za ublažitev ugotovljenih tveganj, ki vključujejo zlasti preventivne in popravne ukrepe, kot so navodila, usposabljanje in prekinitve plačil.
6.13. The most likely error rate estimated by the Court in 2011 is in line with the positive development in recent years. 
6.10 6.13 Najverjetnejša stopnja napake glede na oceno Sodišča iz leta 2011 je v skladu s pozitivnim razvojem v zadnjih letih.
This is the result of improvements made by Member States in their management and control systems, the strict interruptions and suspensions policy applied by DG EMPL since 2008 and the positive impact of the simplification measures provided in the regulations for the current programming period. 
K temu so prispevale izboljšave držav članic v zvezi z upravljavskimi in kontrol­ nimi sistemi, stroga politika prekinitev in začasnih ustavitev plačil, ki jo GD EMPL izvaja od leta 2008, ter pozitiven učinek ukrepov za poenostavitev, predvidenih v uredbah za sedanje programsko obdobje.