natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Economic growth (GDP per capita) was a positive driver of emissions (i.e. not a contributor to mitigation) throughout the period 2005-2013, though this effect has been weaker since 2007/084. 
Gospodarska rast (BDP na prebivalca) je bila pozitiven dejavnik emisij (tj. ne prispeva k blažitvi) v obdobju 2005–2013, čeprav je ta vpliv šibkejši od leta 2007/20084.
In this context, it is not warranted to single out the impact of the economic crisis on emissions. 
V zvezi s tem ni upravičeno izločiti vpliva gospodarske krize na emisije.
08 The Commission highlights that the 20 % objective was announced as one element of the mainstreaming approach in the EU budget, which itself is one element in the EU approach to responding to the investment needs associated with climate change. 
08 Komisija poudarja, da je bil cilj 20 % objavljen kot del pristopa k vključevanju v proračun EU, ki je tudi sam element pristopa EU k odzivanju na naložbene potrebe v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami.
The mainstreaming approach in the EU budget demonstrates the EU commitment to and leadership in climate action, like all EU actions to fight climate change. 
Pristop k vključevanju v proračun EU kaže, da se EU zavzema za podnebne ukrepe in ima pri tem vodilno vlogo, tako kot vsa dejanja EU za boj proti podnebnim spremembam.
09 The Commission considers that 20 % was announced as a political and aspirational target to support achieving greater climate relevance across operations financed by the EU budget. 
09 Komisija meni, da je bil cilj 20 % objavljen kot političen in zaželen cilj, ki daje večji pomen podnebnim vprašanjem v dejavnostih, ki se financirajo iz proračuna EU.
The approach was endorsed by the European Council and the European Parliament, and has underpinned subsequent implementation steps. 
Ta pristop sta odobrila Evropski svet in Evropski parlament in pristop je podprl nadaljnje korake izvajanja.
The Commission underlines that, in spirit of the above, both the Commission and the budgetary authority decided not to make this target part of a legal text. 
Komisija poudarja, da sta glede na navedeno tako Komisija kot proračunski organ sklenila, da ta cilj ne bo del pravnega besedila.
In addition to mainstreaming, the multiannual financial framework (MFF) also sets out a dedicated programme for addressing, inter alia, climate action (under the LIFE programme). 
Poleg vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov večletni finančni okvir določa tudi poseben program, med drugim v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi (na podlagi programa LIFE).
12 The Directorate-General Budget coordinates the allocation of resources in the budget towards policy priorities, including with regard to climate action, collects and consolidates in the Statement of Estimates of the Draft Budget the data to justify the amounts being proposed by the Commission to the Budget Authority for the annual budget procedure. 
12 Generalni direktorat za proračun usklajuje dodeljevanje sredstev v proračunu glede na prednostne politične naloge, vključno z upoštevanjem podnebnih ukrepov, v izjavi o ocenah osnutka proračuna zbira in združuje podatke, ki utemeljujejo zneske, ki jih je predlagala Komisija proračunskemu organu v letnem proračunskem postopku.
4 See EEA decomposition analysis: Section 2.4 of Trends & Projections in Europe 2015: EEA Report No 4/2015 
4 Glej analizo razgradnje EEA: Oddelek 2.4 dokumenta Trendi in napovedi v Evropi za leto 2015: Poročilo EEA št. 4/2015.
Reply of the Commission 65 Box — The context of mainstreaming in brief Fourth bullet EU climate action covers a wide range of measures, and the ambitious targets make the EU a global leader in climate action. 
Odgovori Komisije 65 Okvir – Na kratko o okviru za vključevanje Četrta zaporedna točka Podnebni ukrepi EU zajemajo širok razpon in z visoko zastavljenimi cilji je EU prevzela vodilno vlogo v svetu na področju podnebnih ukrepov.
Mainstreaming climate across EU policies and programmes is one element of supporting the transition to low carbon and climate resilient society. 
Vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov v politike in programe EU je eden od elementov, ki podpirajo prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo in družbo, odporno na podnebne spremembe.
The EU approach to climate mainstreaming into the EU’s instruments and the budget is conceptualised at four levels, as explained in the Commission reply to paragraph 24. 
Pristop EU k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov v instrumente in proračun EU je zasnovan na štirih ravneh, kot je pojasnjeno v odgovoru Komisije na odstavek 24.
Observations 24 The Commission considers that the EU budget has made significant progress in climate mainstreaming. 
Opažanja 24 Komisija meni, da je proračun EU dosegel znaten napredek pri vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov.
The EU approach to climate mainstreaming into the EU’s instruments and the budget is conceptualised at four levels: — The political decisions made by the EU institutions (in the context of the adoption of the MFF 2014-2020) to mainstream climate action5 and to announce an objective of making at least 20 % of EU spending climate relevant. — Enshrining climate objectives in the legal/guidance framework (legal basis for the new set of spending programmes, guidelines). — The implementation of the climate related rules and guidelines (quality of implementation). — As part of the approach, a common method to track climate-related expenditures in all EU instruments. 
Pristop EU k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov v instrumente in proračun EU je zasnovan na štirih ravneh: – Politične odločitve institucij EU (na podlagi sprejetja večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2014–2020) za vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov5 in za objavo cilja, da je vsaj 20 % porabe EU povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi. – Vključitev podnebnih ciljev v pravni/usmerjevalni okvir (pravna podlaga za nove programe porabe, smernice); – Izvajanje pravil in smernic, povezanih s podnebjem (kakovost izvajanja). – Kot del tega pristopa se uporabi enotna metoda za spremljanje odhodkov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, v vseh instrumentih EU.
We recognise that the audit focusses primarily on the financial objective. 
Priznavamo, da se revizija osredotoča predvsem na finančni cilj.
Second indent The Commission disagrees with the Court’s choice to consider a set of principles agreed in 2015 by certain organisations that implement international development assistance as a benchmark for assessing the ‘appropriateness’ of the innovative and detailed EU mainstreaming approach agreed at EU level. 
Druga alinea Komisija se ne strinja z odločitvijo sodišča, da upošteva sklop načel, o katerih so se leta 2015 dogovorile nekatere organizacije, ki postavljajo mednarodno razvojno pomoč kot merilo za presojo „ustreznosti“ inovativnega in podrobnega pristopa EU k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov, ki je bil dogovorjen na ravni EU.
25 The Commission recognises the Court’s decision to consider the 20 % target as a budgetary objective, but reiterates that the target was announced by the Commission as a political objective to support climate mainstreaming in various programmes. 
25 Komisija priznava odločitev Sodišča, da se cilj 20 % obravnava kot proračunski cilj, vendar ponovno poudarja, da je ta cilj Komisija objavila kot politični cilj za podporo pri vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov v različne programe.
Given the nature of the target, the Commission considers that a budgetary interpretation alone does not reflect the EU’s approach to mainstreaming. 
Glede na naravo cilja Komisija meni, da proračunska razlaga sama ne odraža pristopa EU k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov.
Reply of the Commission 66 26 The Commission stresses that the 20 % political objective was announced to help mainstreaming climate action in the EU programmes (see Commission’s reply to paragraph 25). 
Odgovori Komisije 66 26 Komisija poudarja, da je bil politični cilj 20 % objavljen kot pomoč pri vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov v programe EU (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 25).
For this reason the Commission has not quantified the share of the investment needs that should be covered by the EU budget, but considered estimates as outlined in the Commission proposal for the MFF6. 
Zato Komisija ni količinsko opredelila deleža naložbenih potreb, ki bi se morale kriti iz proračuna EU, ampak je obravnavala ocene, kot so predstavljene v predlogu Komisije za večletni finančni okvir6.
27 The Commission considers that there were significant increases in climate-relevant spending. 
27 Komisija meni, da je prišlo do občutnega povečanja porabe, povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi.
The Commission confirms, at the same time, that there are no comprehensive and comparable data on climate-relevant spending in the previous MFF, which would have been a prerequisite for developing more detailed targets. 
Komisija hkrati potrjuje, da v prejšnjem večletnem finančnem okviru ni celovitih in primerljivih podatkov o porabi, povezani s podnebnimi ukrepi, kar bi bil predpogoj za razvoj podrobnejših ciljev.
Developing a robust and transparent tracking system was one element of the EU mainstreaming approach. 
Razvoj zanesljivega in preglednega sistema za spremljanje je bil eden od elementov pristopa EU k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov.
28 The Commission assessed progress towards the 20 % target in the MFF Mid-term Review (MTR), published on 14 September 2016. 
28 Komisija ocenjuje napredek pri doseganju cilja 20 % v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira (MTR), objavljenem 14. septembra 2016.
The data, presented in the Staff Working Document (2016) 299 (SWD) accompanying the Mid-term Review of the multiannual financial framework (COM(2016) 603) show that over the 2014-2020 period, a total of slightly above EUR 200 billion of climate-related spending will be reached. 
Podatki, predstavljeni v delovnem dokumentu služb Komisije (SWD(2016)299), priloženem vmesnemu pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira (COM(2016) 603), kažejo, da bo v obdobju 2014–2020 skupna poraba za podnebne ukrepe dosegla nekaj več kot 200 milijard EUR.
This is equivalent to around 18.9 % for the whole financial programming period. 
To ustreza približno 18,9 % za celotno obdobje finančnega programa.
The data published in Annex 2 of the SWD details totals by programme estimates on climate tracking of 20 % target for the full 2014-2020 programming period. 
Podatki, objavljeni v Prilogi 2 delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije, prikazujejo skupne številke glede na programske ocene o zasledovanju cilja 20 % za podnebne ukrepe za celotno programsko obdobje 2014–2020.
Climate Mainstreaming 2014-2020 — Totals by programme (EUR million, commitment appropriations) 2014-2017 2018-2020 estimates Programme 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 2014-2020 For reference: Total EU budget (Section III — Commission, Financial programming) 118 054.4 158 606.8 151 241.6 153 757.8 156 782.8 159 966.3 164 145.4 1 062 554.9 Total Climate Change finance in the EU budget 16 097.7 27 475.7 31 634.4 29 726.8 30 777.7 31 883.6 32 307.7 200 986.9 Share of Climate Change-relevant spending in EU Budget 13.6 % 17.3 % 20.9 % 19.3 % 19.6 % 19.9 % 19.7 % 18.9 % Common Commission reply to paragraphs 31 and 32 The Commission reiterates that the political objective of 20 % was announced to foster mainstreaming (see also Commission reply to paragraph 25). 
Climate Mainstreaming 2014-2020 - totals by programme (EUR million, commitment appropriations) 2014-2017 2018-2020 estimates Programme 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 2014-2020 For reference: Total EU Budget (Section III-Commission, Financial programming) 118 054.4 158 606.8 151 241.6 153 757.8 156 782.8 159 966.3 164 145.4 1 062 554.9 Total Climate Change finance in the EU Budget 16 097.7 27 475.7 31 634.4 29 726.8 30 777.7 31 883.6 32 307.7 200 986.9 Share of Climate Change relevant spending in EU Budget 13.6 % 17.3 % 20.9 % 19.3 % 19.6 % 19.9 % 19.7 % 18.9 % Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 31 in 32 Komisija poudarja, da je bil politični cilj 20 % objavljen za spodbujanje vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov (glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 25).
The Commission considers such a flexible setting of the 20 % target as appropriate in developing an innovative approach to mainstreaming and tracking climate-relevant spending. 
Komisija meni, da je takšna prilagodljiva določitev cilja 20 % primerna za razvoj inovativnega pristopa k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov in spremljanju porabe, povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi.
The EU mainstreaming approach seeks integrating climate aspects across the EU budget. 
Pristop EU k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov si prizadeva povezati podnebne vidike v celotnem proračunu EU.
The Commission confirms that the co-legislators did not consider specific targets necessary for promoting climate mainstreaming in all programmes. 
Komisija potrjuje, da sozakonodajalca nista upoštevala posebnih ciljev, potrebnih za spodbujanje vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov v vse programe.
As outlined in the Commission reply to paragraph 24, mainstreaming is pursued in multiple processes, with specific targets being one of these. 
Kot je navedeno v odgovoru Komisije na odstavek 24, se vključevanje izvaja v več postopkih, med katerimi so tudi posebni cilji.
The data published in the MFF MTR show that many programmes across the EU budget contribute to climate action. 
Iz podatkov, objavljenih v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira, je razvidno, da mnogi programi v okviru proračuna EU prispevajo k podnebnim ukrepom.
At the same time, the Commission concurs that specific objectives can be useful for advancing climate mainstreaming. 
Hkrati se Komisija strinja, da so lahko posebni cilji koristni za spodbujanje vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov.
Climate-relevant spending is tracked across the budget; in the case of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) this tracking requirement was set by the co-legislators. 
Poraba, povezana s podnebnimi ukrepi, se spremlja v proračunu; pri evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladih (skladi ESI) sta zahtevo za spremljanje določila sozakonodajalca.
Reply of the Commission 67 34 The Commission recognises that the pioneering EU tracking method, unique in its coverage and detail and agreed in the EU legislative process, can be further improved. 
Odgovori Komisije 67 34 Komisija priznava, da je pionirsko metodo spremljanja ki jo uporablja EU in je edinstvena glede obsega in podrobnosti ter dogovorjena v zakonodajnem postopku EU, mogoče še dodatno izboljšati.
At the same time, there are no internationally agreed methods for quantified tracking climate spending. 
Hkrati pa ne obstajajo mednarodno dogovorjene metode za količinsko opredeljeno spremljanje porabe za podnebne ukrepe.
35 The EU method of assigning coefficients to EU expenditure has proven to be an appropriate balance between the robustness of data and the administrative effort required both in the Commission and Member States. 
35 Metoda EU za določanje koeficientov za odhodke EU se je izkazala kot ustrezno ravnovesje med zanesljivostjo podatkov in potrebnim upravnim ukrepanjem Komisije in držav članic.
First indent The Commission recognises the possibility of some over-and under-estimation of climate relevance of certain spending with the current methodology and also as a direct consequence of applying a system based on the three ‘Rio markers’ average ratios. 
Prva alinea Komisija priznava obstoj določenih previsokih in prenizkih ocen nekaterih izdatkov v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi s sedanjo metodologijo kot tudi kot neposredne posledice uporabe sistema, ki temelji na povprečnih razmerjih treh „kazalnikov iz Ria“.
At the same time, the Commission considers its methodology to be sufficiently conservative and does not consider a set of principles developed by a group of international aid organisations in 2015 for mitigation tracking of their operations to be a relevant point of reference for the approach used by the Commission. 
Hkrati Komisija meni, da je metodologija dovolj konservativna, in sodi, da sklop načel, ki jih je leta 2015 postavila skupina mednarodnih organizacij za pomoč za spremljanje svojih dejavnosti za blažitev podnebnih sprememb, ni ustrezno izhodišče za pristop, ki ga je uporabila Komisija.
The Commission underlines that some of the Court’s calculations used in the report used coefficients that differ from the ones used by the Commission. 
Komisija poudarja, da nekateri izračuni Sodišča, uporabljeni v poročilu, uporabljajo koeficiente, ki se razlikujejo od tistih, ki jih uporablja Komisija.
Second indent The Commission considers the tracking approach agreed by the EU co-legislators robust and fit for its specific purposes. 
Druga alinea Komisija meni, da je pristop spremljanja, o katerem sta se dogovorila sozakonodajalca EU, zanesljiv in ustrezen za svoje posebne namene.
While useful in informing the EU approach, the OECD categories and methods were not designed with the aim to support mainstreaming and quantified tracking in the EU budget and have therefore been adjusted by the co-legislator to the programme-specific needs in the respective legislative bases. 
Čeprav so kategorije in metode OECD informativno koristne za pristop EU, niso bile zasnovane z namenom podpore vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov in njihovega količinsko opredeljenega spremljanja v proračunu EU, zato sta jih sozakonodajalca prilagodila posebnim zahtevam programov v posameznih pravnih podlagah.
The Commission points out that the primary objective of different EU programmes is set in the respective legal base, and mainstreaming by nature means making the implementation of the primary objective consistent with EU climate policy, not replacing the primary objective. 
Komisija opozarja, da je glavni cilj različnih programov EU določen na ustrezni pravni podlagi in vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov po naravi pomeni izvajanje glavnega cilja v skladu s podnebno politiko EU ter ne nadomešča glavnega cilja.
36 The EU climate tracking system incorporates specific elements that make it differ from the ones used by the international aid organisations, and therefore comparison to international assistance tracking systems is not relevant. 
36 Sistem EU za spremljanje podnebnih ukrepov vključuje posebne elemente, ki se razlikujejo od tistih, ki jih uporabljajo mednarodne organizacije za pomoč, zato primerjava s sistemi spremljanja mednarodne pomoči ni upoštevna.
The Commission recognises that the innovative approach to tracking climate spending and its implementation in the EU budget could be further improved, including in respect of increasing granularity with regard to mitigation and adaptation. 
Komisija meni, da bilo mogoče inovativni pristop k spremljanju porabe za podnebne ukrepe in njegovo izvajanje v proračunu EU še izboljšati, med drugim z večjo razčlenjenostjo glede blažitve in prilagajanja.
At the same time, in light of the unclear administrative impact and the complexity of avoiding double counting while reflecting the frequent associated co-benefits, the Commission does not currently foresee further disaggregation in its tracking system. 
Istočasno pa Komisija glede na nejasne upravne učinke in zapletenost izogibanja dvojnemu štetju, hkrati pa ob upoštevanju pogostih povezanih vzporednih koristi trenutno ne predvideva nadaljnje razčlenitve svojega sistema spremljanja.
37 The Commission agrees with the importance of financial instruments and their contribution to EU climate action and has included the budget contribution to these in its tracking of climate spending. 
37 Komisija se strinja glede pomembnosti finančnih instrumentov in njihovega prispevka k podnebnim ukrepom EU in je prispevek iz proračuna za te vključila v spremljanje porabe za podnebne ukrepe.
Reply of the Commission 68 39 The Commission considers that good progress on climate mainstreaming has been achieved in most respects and that the tracking on budget spending is robust and transparent, as outlined in its replies notably to paragraphs 12 and 28. 
Odgovori Komisije 68 39 Komisija meni, da je bil glede vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov v večini vidikov dosežen znaten napredek in da je spremljanje proračunske porabe zanesljivo in pregledno, zlasti kot je navedeno v odgovorih Komisije na odstavka 12 in 28.
The Commission recognises the need to further develop its approach to tracking and reporting climate results. 
Komisija priznava, da mora nadalje razvijati svoj pristop k spremljanju in sporočanju rezultatov v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi.
40 See also Commission replies to paragraphs V and 28. 
40 Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavka V in 28.
41 The Commission confirms that before the MFF MTR, as detailed in the Commission reply to paragraph 28, it was not in a position to assess with confidence whether it is on track to reach the 20 % target, as information was still lacking on ESIF funds programmed expenditure for the MFF period, and therefore no reliable data was available at the time. 
41 Komisija potrjuje, da pred vmesnim pregledom večletnega finančnega okvira, kakor je podrobno opisano v odgovoru Komisije na odstavek 28, še ni mogla presojati, ali je na dobri poti, da doseže cilj 20 %, saj še vedno ni bilo informacij o načrtovanih odhodkih skladov ESI za obdobje večletnega finančnega okvira, zato takrat ni bilo na voljo zanesljivih podatkov.
The Commission assessed progress towards the 20 % target in the MFF MTR, showing that over the 2014-2020 period, a total of slightly above EUR 200 billion of climate-related spending will be reached. 
Komisija je ocenila napredek pri doseganju cilja 20 % v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira, iz katerega je razvidno, da bo v obdobju 2014–2020 skupna poraba za podnebne ukrepe dosegla nekaj več kot 200 milijard EUR.
43 The planned climate measures, with the corresponding coefficients, are listed in the operational programmes (OPs) of the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF). 
43 Načrtovani podnebni ukrepi, skupaj z ustreznimi koeficienti, so navedeni v operativnih programih Evropskega sklada za pomorstvo in ribištvo (ESPR).
The indicative EMFF allocation to each measure is included in the Member States’ (MS) annual implementation reports (starting in May 2016). 
Okvirne dodelitve ESPR za vsak ukrep so vključene v letna poročila držav članic o izvajanju (od maja 2016).
The financial table in those reports and the key characteristics of the supported operations that will appear in the MS annual reports on operations (pursuant to EMFF Article 97(1)(a) will allow the Commission to continuously monitor the level of spending as well as any changes to the indicative contribution to climate change declared in the OP. 
Na podlagi finančne tabele v teh poročilih in ključnih značilnosti podprtih operacij, ki bodo vključene v letna poročila držav članic o dejavnostih (v skladu s čl. 97(1)(a) ESPR), bo lahko Komisija stalno spremljala raven porabe ter vse morebitne spremembe okvirnega prispevka k podnebnim spremembam, navedenega v operativnem programu.
44 With the programming processes fully completed, the Commission is now in a position to consolidate reliable data for updated estimates of these programmes with regard to climate spending, and has published the state of play in the context of the MFF MTR. 
44 Zdaj, ko so programski procesi v celoti dokončani, je Komisija v položaju, ko lahko konsolidira zanesljive podatke za posodobljene ocene teh programov v zvezi s porabo za podnebne ukrepe, in je objavila stanje v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira.
This exercise would have been based on inaccurate data and thus could have led to erroneous calculations and misinterpretations, if undertaken on the basis of 2014-2016 provisional data. 
Če bi bil ta postopek izveden na podlagi začasnih podatkov za obdobje 2014–2016, bi temeljil na netočnih podatkih, kar bi lahko privedlo do zmotnih izračunov in napačnih razlag.