natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In general, the roll out of technology which provides higher speeds is more expensive than technology delivering lower speeds although maintenance costs are lower. 
Na splošno je uvedba tehnologije, ki zagotavlja višje hitrosti, dražja od tiste, ki zagotavlja nižje hitrosti, čeprav so stroški njenega vzdrževanja nižji.
In addition, operators’ management costs are also likely to be reduced progressively as legacy networks are decommissioned. 
Poleg tega se bodo takrat, ko se bodo prenehala uporabljati obstoječa omrežja, verjetno postopno znižali tudi stroški operaterjev za upravljanje.
12 Box 2 – The Internet of Things The Internet of Things is a network of physical devices with the ability to transfer data without the need for human-to-human or human-to-computer interaction. 
12 Okvir 2 – Internet stvari Internet stvari je mreža fizičnih naprav z zmožnostjo prenosa podatkov brez potrebne interakcije med ljudmi ali med človekom in računalnikom.
Examples are: Smart homes (e.g. controlling thermostat, lights, music), Smart cities (e.g. controlling street lights, traffic lights, parking), self-driving cars, Smart farming (combining data on soil moisture or pesticide usage with advanced imaging). 
Primeri so: pametni domovi (npr. nadzor termostata, luči, glasbe), pametna mesta (npr. nadzor uličnih svetilk, semaforjev, parkirišč), avtomobili brez voznika, pametno kmetovanje (združevanje podatkov o vlagi tal ali uporabi pesticidov z napredno tehnologijo slikanja).
EU policies for broadband 6. 
Politike EU za širokopasovne povezave 6.
Launched in 2010, Europe 2020 is the EU’s long-term strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth6. 
Strategija Evropa 2020, ki je bila uvedena leta 2010, je dolgoročna strategija EU za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast6.
It contains seven flagship initiatives. 
Zajema sedem vodilnih pobud.
One of these, “A Digital Agenda for Europe”7, sets out targets for fast and ultra-fast internet to maximise the social and economic potential of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), most notably the internet, for EU citizens and businesses. 
Ena od teh, „Evropska digitalna agenda”7, določa ciljne vrednosti za hitre in ultra hitre medmrežne povezave, s katerimi bi se čim bolj izkoristil družbeni in gospodarski potencial informacijskih The State of Broadband, Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development, ITU & Unesco, september 2017.
COM(2010) 2020 “EU 2020, A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth”. 
COM(2010) 2020 – Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast.
The first two targets focus on supplying certain speeds, while the third relates to the demand by users. 
Prvi dve ciljni vrednosti sta osredotočeni na zagotovitev določenih hitrosti, tretja pa se nanaša na zahtevo glede uporabnikov.
These targets have become a reference for public policy throughout the EU, and have given direction to public and private investment. 
Te ciljne vrednosti so postale referenca za javno politiko po vsej EU, poleg tega pa so služile kot usmeritev za javne in zasebne naložb.
The comparable target for the USA is in Box 3. 
Primerljive ciljne vrednosti za ZDA so predstavljene v okviru 3.
13 Box 3 – Broadband targets in the USA In the USA, the National Broadband Plan “Connecting America" was adopted in March 2010 and recommended that the country adopt and track six goals for 2020, the first of which was "At least 100 million U.S. homes should have affordable access to actual download speeds of at least 100 megabits per second and actual upload speeds of at least 50 megabits per second". 
Okvir 3 – Ciljne vrednosti v zvezi s širokopasovnimi povezavami v ZDA ZDA so marca 2010 sprejele nacionalni načrt za širokopasovne povezave z naslovom Connecting America. V njem je bilo priporočeno, naj država sprejme in skuša uresničiti šest ciljev za leto 2020, od katerih je bil prvi ta, da mora vsaj 100 milijonov gospodinjstev ZDA imeti cenovno ugoden dostop do povezav z dejanskimi hitrostmi prenosa podatkov s strežnika vsaj 100 megabitov na sekundo in dejanskimi hitrostmi prenosa podatkov na strežnik vsaj 50 megabitov na sekundo.
Thus the objectives did not include 100 % of the population and the targets specified actual upload and download speeds. 
Cilji tako niso zajemali celotnega prebivalstva, ciljne vrednosti pa so se nanašale na dejanske hitrosti prenosa podatkov s strežnika in na strežnik.
In 2010, the Commission also set out a common framework for action at EU and Member State levels to meet these targets. 
Komisija je leta 2010 določila skupni okvir za ukrepanje na ravni EU in na ravni držav članic za dosego teh ciljnih vrednosti.
Requirements for Member States included the need to: (i) develop and make operational national broadband plans by 2012; (ii) take measures, including legal provisions, to facilitate broadband investment; and (iii) use fully the Structural and Rural Development Funds. 
Zahteve za države članice so vključevale: (i) razvoj in uresničitev načrtov na področju širokopasovnih povezav do leta 2012; (ii) sprejetje ukrepov, vključno s pravnimi določbami, za lajšanje naložb v širokopasovne povezave; ter (iii) uporabo strukturnih skladov in skladov za razvoj podeželja v celoti.
In September 2016, the Commission identified in a Communication commonly known as the ‘Gigabit Society for 2025’9 three strategic objectives for 2025 that complement those set out in the Digital Agenda for 2020: - Connectivity of at least 1 gigabit10 for all main socio-economic drivers (such as schools, transport hubs and the main providers of public services); COM(2016) 587. A gigabit per second is 1000 Mbps, significantly faster than the Europe 2020 targets. 9 10 
Septembra 2016 je Komisija v sporočilu, splošno znanem kot gigabitna družba za leto 20259, opredelila tri strateške cilje za leto 2025, ki dopolnjujejo tiste, določene v digitalni agendi za leto 2020: - vsaj 1-gigiabitna povezljivost10 za vse glavne spodbujevalce socialno-ekonomskega razvoja (kot so šole, prometna vozlišča in glavni izvajalci javnih storitev), - neprekinjena pokritost z omrežji 5G za vsa mestna območja in vse glavne prizemne prometne poti, - dostop vseh evropskih gospodinjstev, v mestih in na podeželju, do medmrežne povezljivosti s hitrostjo prenosa podatkov s strežnika vsaj 100 Mb/s, ki se lahko nadgradi v gigabitno hitrost.
EU financial support to broadband infrastructures 9. 
Finančna podpora EU za infrastrukture širokopasovnih povezav 9.
The European Commission estimated in 2013 that up to 250 billion euro will be required to achieve the 2020 broadband targets11. 
Evropska komisija je leta 2013 ocenila, da bo za dosego ciljnih vrednosti v zvezi s širokopasovnimi povezavami do leta 2020 potrebnih 250 milijard EUR11.
However, the re-use of existing infrastructure and effective implementation of the Cost Reduction Directive12 could bring down these costs13. 
Vendar pa bi s ponovno uporabo obstoječe infrastrukture in uspešnim izvajanjem direktive o zmanjšanju stroškov12 te stroške lahko znižali13.
The telecommunication sector is the major private investor in broadband infrastructures. 
Telekomunikacijski sektor je največji zasebni vlagatelj v širokopasovne infrastrukture.
Some segments of the market, such as rural areas, are not attractive to private investors. 
Nekateri tržni segmenti, kot so podeželska območja, zasebnim vlagateljem niso zanimivi.
Financing from the public sector, whether national, regional or municipal, is required to provide acceptable broadband connectivity in these areas. 
Za zagotovitev sprejemljive širokopasovne povezljivosti na teh območjih je zato potrebno financiranje javnega sektorja bodisi na nacionalni, regionalni ali občinski ravni.
The EU is an additional source of financing complementing other sources of public funding (national regional or local) in areas subject to market failure. In some Member States it can constitute the main source of public funding. 
EU je dodatni COM(2016) 587. Gigabit na sekundo je 1 000 Mb/s, kar pomeni znatno višjo ciljno vrednost od tiste, določene v strategiji Evropa 2020.
European Commission,”The socio-economic impact of bandwith”, 2013, p. 
Evropska komisija, The socio-economic impact of bandwith, 2013, str.
Directive 2014/61/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 May 2014 on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks (OJ L 155, 23.5.2014, p. 
Direktiva 2014/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o ukrepih za znižanje stroškov za postavitev elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij visokih hitrosti (UL L 155, 23.5.2014, str.
Fibre to the Home Council Europe, News Flash, “Costs for fibre based Gigabit Society significant but achievable”, FTTH Conference, Marseille, 16.2.2017. 
Fibre to the Home Council Europe, kratko poročilo, Costs for fibre based Gigabit Society significant but achievable, konferenca FTTH, Marseille, 16. februar 2017.
The Commission, together with the Member States, manages the Structural Funds (ERDF, EAFRD). 
Komisija skupaj z državami članicami upravlja strukturne sklade (ESRR, EKSRP).
The Commission also provides a guarantee in support of projects financed by the EIB. 
Komisija zagotavlja tudi jamstvo v podporo projektom, ki jih financira EIB.
The EIB is responsible for the management of its own loans and, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI). 
EIB je odgovorna za upravljanje svojih posojil in Evropskega sklada za strateške naložbe (EFSI).
The Commission manages the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and part of the available funding for broadband under CEF is envisaged to be invested in the Connecting Europe Broadband Fund (CEBF). 
Komisija upravlja instrumenta za povezovanje Evrope (IPE) in del razpoložljivih finančnih sredstev za širokopasovne povezave naj bi se predvidoma investiral v sklad za širokopasovno povezovanje Evrope (CEBF).
The CEBF will be managed by an independent Fund Manager and mandated to act according to the terms of reference agreed by the EIB, the Commission and the other funding partners. 
CEBF bo upravljal neodvisni upravljavec skladov, delovati pa bo moral v skladu s pristojnostmi, o katerih se bodo dogovorili EIB, Komisija in drugi partnerji pri financiranju.
The audit addressed the effectiveness of the action taken by the Commission, the Member States and the EIB to achieve the Europe 2020 broadband objectives. 
Sodišče je preučilo uspešnost ukrepov, ki so jih sprejele Evropska komisija, države članice in EIB za dosego ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 za širokopasovne povezave.
particularly relevant as the 2020 deadline is approaching and as the Commission has communicated new objectives for 2025. 
To je zlasti pomembno zato, ker se približuje rok leta 2020 in ker je Komisija sporočila nove cilje za leto 2025.
To do this, we examined: - whether the Member States are likely to achieve the Europe 2020 broadband objectives and whether the Commission monitored these achievements; - whether the Member States had developed appropriate strategies to achieve these objectives; and - whether the Member States had effectively implemented their strategies – including the measures and financing sources chosen (including the EIB) and the regulatory, competitive and technological environments established. 
Sodišče je zato preučilo: - ali je verjetno, da bodo države članice dosegle cilje strategije Evropa 2020 za širokopasovne povezave in ali je Komisija te dosežke spremljala, - ali so države članice razvile ustrezne strategije za dosego teh ciljev ter - ali so države članice uspešno izvajale svoje strategije – vključno z ukrepi in izbranimi viri financiranja (vključno z EIB) ter vzpostavljenim regulativnim, konkurenčnim in tehnološkim okoljem.
We also examined the Commission’s support in relation to these three topics. 
Sodišče je preučilo tudi podporo Komisije v zvezi s temi tremi temami.
This audit covered all the funding sources listed in Table 2: ERDF, EAFRD, CEF, EFSI, EIB loans and CEBF. 
Revizija je zajela vse vire financiranja, navedene v tabeli 2: ESRR, EKSRP, IPE, EFSI, posojila EIB in CEBF.
It focused on five Member States: Ireland, Germany, Hungary, Poland and Italy. 
Osredotočena je bila na pet držav članic: Irsko, Nemčijo, Madžarsko, Poljsko in Italijo.
These Member States represent around 40 % of the EU population, and were selected to provide reasonable balance in terms of geographical spread and aspects of broadband coverage, such as rurality and subscription cost. 
Te države predstavljajo približno 40 % prebivalstva EU in so bile izbrane, da bi se zagotovilo ustrezno ravnovesje glede geografske porazdelitve in vidikov širokopasovne pokritosti, kot so posebnosti podeželja in stroški naročnine.
The audit covered the 2007-2013 and the 2014-2020 programme periods. 
Revizija je zajemala programski obdobji 2007–2013 in 2014–2020.
At EU level, the audit covered all the Commission Directorates-General with significant roles in broadband14, as well as the EIB with regard to the EFSI and the CEBF. 
Na ravni EU je revizija zajela vse generalne direktorate Komisije, ki imajo pomembno vlogo na področju širokopasovnih povezav14, ter EIB v zvezi z EFSI in CEBF.
The audit team visited various relevant stakeholders and NGOs in Brussels and the Member States: telecommunication associations, consumer associations and enterprise associations. 
obiskala različne relevantne deležnike in nevladne organizacije v Bruslju in državah članicah: združenja telekomunikacijskih operaterjev, potrošnikov in podjetij.
Visits in the Member States examined included ministries responsible for setting up and implementing the broadband strategy, bodies responsible for managing the programmes funded through the ESI funds, Broadband Competence Offices, and National Regulatory Authorities. 
Obiski v preučenih državah članicah so vključevali ministrstva, odgovorna za oblikovanje in izvajanje strategije na področju širokopasovnih povezav, organe, pristojne za upravljanje programov, ki se financirajo iz skladov ESI, kompetenčne urade za širokopasovne povezave in nacionalne regulativne organe.
We also benefited from the input of telecommunication experts on the observations, conclusions and recommendations of this report. 
Pri pripravi opažanj, sklepov in priporočil iz tega poročila pa so sodelovali tudi strokovnjaki za telekomunikacije.
OBSERVATIONS Although broadband coverage is improving across the EU, some Europe 2020 targets are unlikely to be achieved 16. 
OPAŽANJA Pokritost s širokopasovnimi povezavami v EU se sicer izboljšuje, vendar nekatere ciljne vrednosti strategije Evropa 2020 verjetno ne bodo dosežene 16.
We reviewed the progress achieved by the Member States since 2010 against the three Digital Agenda targets (see paragraphs 6 and 7). 
Sodišče je pregledalo napredek, ki so ga države članice dosegle od leta 2010 pri uresničevanju treh ciljnih vrednosti digitalne agende (glej odstavka 6 in 7).
We also took account of whether Members States were likely to achieve the 2025 targets, and assessed the Commission’s monitoring and its support to the Member States. 
Upoštevalo je tudi, ali je verjetno, da države članice dosežejo ciljne vrednosti za leto 2025, ter ocenilo nadzor Komisije in njeno podporo državam članicam.
All Member States achieved the basic broadband coverage target by 2016 Target 1: by 2013, to bring basic broadband to all Europeans 17. 
Vse države članice so do leta 2016 dosegle ciljno vrednost glede pokritosti z osnovnimi širokopasovnimi povezavami Ciljna vrednost 1: do leta 2013 vsem Evropejcem zagotoviti osnovne širokopasovne povezave 17.
At the end of 2013, all Member States except the three Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) had achieved the target for basic broadband coverage. 
Ob koncu leta 2013 so vse države članice razen treh baltskih (Estonije, Latvije in Litve) dosegle ciljno vrednost glede pokritosti z osnovnimi širokopasovnimi povezavami.
By the end of June 2016, virtually all citizens in the EU had access to basic broadband networks and 98 % of the households had access to fixed broadband connections. 
Do konca junija 2016 so praktično vsi državljani EU imeli dostop do osnovnih širokopasovnih omrežij, 98 % gospodinjstev pa je imelo dostop do fiksnih širokopasovnih povezav. 17
Two of the five examined Member States may achieve the 30 Mbps coverage target by 2020 but rural areas remain problematic in most Member States Target 2: by 2020, to ensure coverage of all Europeans with fast broadband (> 30 Mbps) 18. 
Dve od petih preučenih držav članic bi lahko do leta 2020 dosegli ciljno vrednost glede pokritosti s povezavami hitrosti najmanj 30 Mb/s, toda podeželska območja ostajajo problematična v večini držav članic Ciljna vrednost 2: do leta 2020 vsem Evropejcem zagotoviti pokritost s hitrimi širokopasovnimi povezavami (> 30 Mb/s) 18.
For this target, we found significant improvement in most Member States. 
V zvezi s to ciljno vrednostjo je Sodišče v večini držav članic ugotovilo bistvene izboljšave.
Across the EU, the proportion of households with access to fast broadband increased from 48 % in 2011 to 80 % in June 2017. 
Delež gospodinjstev, ki imajo dostop do širokopasovnih povezav, se je v celotni EU povečal z 48 % leta 2011 na 80 % junija 2017.
At that date, Malta had already achieved the target. 
Malta je takrat tudi že dosegla ciljno vrednost.
However, there remain important differences between Member States: Greece and France had achieved about 50 % coverage, and a further seven Member States remained below 80 % (see Figure 2). 17 
Vendar pa še vedno obstajajo pomembne razlike med državami članicami: Grčija in Francija sta dosegli približno 50-odstotno pokritost, nadaljnjih sedem držav članic pa je še vedno pod 80 % (glej sliko 2).
Figure 2 - 30 Mbps coverage in all Member States in 2011 and in 2017 Note: no data was available for Cyprus and Croatia in 2011. 
Slika 2 – Pokritost s povezavami hitrosti 30 Mb/s v vseh državah članicah v letih 2011 in 2017 19 Opomba: Podatki za Ciper in Hrvaško za leto 2011 niso bili na voljo.
Source: ECA analysis based on Commission data. 19. 
Vir: analiza Sodišča na podlagi podatkov Komisije 19.
In the five audited Member States, the trend was also for increased coverage between 2011 and 2017 (see Figure 3). 
V petih revidiranih državah članicah je bil opažen tudi trend vse večje pokritosti med letoma 2011 in 2017 (glej sliko 3).
Through a combination of private and public investments, Hungary, Ireland and Italy have significantly increased their fast broadband coverage since 2011. 
Madžarska, Irska in Italija so s kombinacijo zasebnih in javnih naložb od leta 2011 bistveno povečevale pokritost s hitrimi širokopasovnimi povezavami.
In addition, these three Member States have plans to increase further this coverage in rural and sub-urban areas. 
Poleg tega nameravajo te države pokritost še dodatno povečati na podeželskih in primestnih območjih.
However, in the cases of Ireland and Italy, based on past progress and current plans, it is unlikely that the 30 Mbps will be available to all citizens by 2020. 
Toda za Irsko in Italijo je Sodišče ugotovilo, da glede na njun dosedanji napredek in trenutne načrte ni verjetno, da bodo povezave hitrosti 30 Mb/s na voljo vsem državljanom
Two Member States, Hungary and Germany, could still achieve 100 % coverage of the population at 30 Mbps by 2020, based on their deployment plans. 
do leta 2020. 1 3
19 did not include the coverage of 13 % of the households by 2020, primarily in sub-urban and rural areas (see paragraph 57). 
Poljski načrti za uvedbo konec leta 2017 niso vključevali pokritosti 13 % gospodinjstev do leta 2020, in sicer predvsem v primestnih in podeželskih območjih (glej odstavek 57).
Figure 3 - Evolution of 30 Mbps coverage in the five examined Member States from 2011 to 2017 Coverage (% of population) 100% 80% 60% HU 40% PL IE 20% IT 0% Target 100% DE PL IE IT DE HU 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: ECA analysis based on Commission data. 21. 
Slika 3 – Razvoj pokritosti s povezavami hitrosti 30 Mb/s v petih preučenih državah članicah od leta 2011 do leta 2017 20 Pokritost (v % prebivalstva) 100 % 80 % DE 60 % 40 % IE IT 2011 2012 Ciljna vrednost 100 % IT DE HU PL IE HU PL 20 % 0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Vir: analiza Sodišča na podlagi podatkov Komisije 21.
This general increase in fast broadband coverage hides a significant discrepancy between coverage in urban and rural areas. 
To splošno povečanje pokritosti s hitrimi širokopasovnimi povezavami skriva precejšnje razlike med pokritostjo v mestnih in podeželskih območjih.
Across the EU, coverage in rural areas was 47 % of the households in 2016, against the overall average of 80 %15. 
V celotni EU je v letu 2016 pokritost na podeželskih območjih zajemala 47 % gospodinjstev, medtem ko je bilo splošno povprečje 80 %15.
Only three, relatively small or urbanised Member States, Malta, Luxembourg and the Netherlands had coverage in their rural areas equivalent to the urban areas (see Figure 4). 
Malti, v Luksemburgu in na Nizozemskem – je bila pokritost na podeželskih območjih enaka pokritosti v mestnih območjih (glej sliko 4).
broadband coverage in rural areas is less than 50 %. Without good broadband coverage, the risk is that rural areas miss out on the economic and social benefits that can flow (see paragraph 1). 
Brez dobre pokritosti s širokopasovnimi povezavami v podeželskih območjih obstaja tveganje, da bodo ta območja prikrajšana za gospodarske in socialne koristi, ki jih tovrstne povezave prinašajo (glej odstavek 1).
In France, the updated national broadband plan of 2013 aimed at a coverage of the whole population at speeds of 30 Mbps by 2022, with a coverage of 80 % of the population through fibre. 
Cilj posodobljenega nacionalnega načrta Francije za širokopasovne povezave iz leta 2013 je bila pokritost celotnega prebivalstva s povezavami hitrosti 30 Mb/s do leta 2022 in pokritost 80 % prebivalstva s povezavami prek optičnih kablov.
However, in a report of January 2017, the French Court of Auditors questioned the relevance of the use of fibre in certain areas, since the costs of fibre are high and the implementation timing too long. 
Vendar je v poročilu iz januarja 2017 francosko računsko sodišče izrazilo pomisleke glede primernosti uporabe optičnih kablov v nekaterih območjih, ker so njihovi stroški visoki, časovnica izvajanja pa predolga.
France is now considering the use of other technologies such as 4G fixed wireless connections in certain areas. 
Francija zdaj za nekatera območja preučuje uporabo drugih tehnologij, kot so fiksne brezžične povezave 4G.
Figure 4 - 30 Mbps coverage in rural areas compared to total coverage in 2017 Source: ECA analysis based on Commission data. 
Slika 4 – Pokritost s povezavami hitrosti 30 Mb/s na podeželskih območjih v primerjavi s skupno pokritostjo v letu 2017 Vir: analiza Sodišča na podlagi podatkov Komisije Večina preučenih držav članic verjetno ne bo dosegla ciljne vrednosti glede naročnine na ultra hitre širokopasovne povezave do leta 2020 ...
Target 3: by 2020, to ensure take-up of 50 % or more of European households to ultra-fast broadband (> 100 Mbps) 23. 
Ciljna vrednost 3: do leta 2020 zagotoviti, da se vsaj 50 % ali več evropskih gospodinjstev naroči na ultra hitre širokopasovne povezave (> 100 Mb/s).
The availability of ultra-fast broadband is a pre-requisite for households subscribing to 100 Mbps services. 
Razpoložljivost ultra hitrih širokopasovnih povezav je predpogoj za to, da se gospodinjstva naročajo na storitve hitrosti 100 Mb/s.
However, take-up is also driven by demand and depends on multiple variables such as population age and education, subscription price, and purchasing power. 
Vendar pa so naročnine odvisne tudi od povpraševanja in številnih spremenljivk, kot so starost in izobrazba populacije, cena naročnine in kupna moč.
Target 3 remains very challenging for all Member States. 
Ciljna vrednost 3 je še vedno velik izziv za vse države članice.
Although take-up has increased since 2013, in 2017 it remained under 20 % in 19 Member States, a long way short of the 50 % target. 
Čeprav se je število naročnin od leta 2013 povečalo, pa je bilo leta 2017 še vedno pod 20 % v 19 državah članicah, kar je daleč pod 50-odstotno ciljno vrednostjo.