natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There is no obligation under State aid rules for private investors to declare whether they will or will not invest in an area targeted by public investment. 
Pravila o državni pomoči ne določajo, da se morajo zasebni vlagatelji izreči, ali bodo vlagali v območje, v katero so usmerjene javne naložbe.
Private operators are free to change their investment plans and sometimes an operator may decide to invest in a given area, although in the mapping and public consultation exercise it had not announced an intention to intervene. 
Zasebni operaterji lahko spremenijo svoje naložbene načrte in včasih se lahko operater odloči za vlaganje v določeno območje, čeprav pri kartiranju in javnem posvetovanju ni naznanil, da namerava posredovati.
From a State aid perspective, the only "sanction" of this change of plans is that the public intervention may continue. 
Z vidika državne pomoči je edina „kazen“ za to spremembo načrta, da se lahko javno posredovanje nadaljuje.
However, this does not prevent national authorities, including national regulatory authorities, from adopting national rules and procedures to provide a more rigorous framework to address such strategies by operators. 
Vendar to nacionalnim organom, vključno z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi, ne preprečuje sprejetja nacionalnih predpisov in postopkov, da bi zagotovili strožji okvir za obravnavanje takih strategij operaterjev.
Furthermore, to avoid the potential problem of crowding-out and delays in coverage, the proposal for a European Electronic Communication Code (article 22 on geographical surveys) provides for the possibility for national regulatory authorities firstly to designate a "digital exclusion area" where no operator or public authority has deployed or plans to deploy a very high capacity network, and secondly to sanction operators which act differently from their stated intentions at the time of the call. 
Da bi se preprečile morebitne težave zaradi izrinjanja in zamude pri pokritosti, predlog Evropskega zakonika o elektronskih komunikacijah (člen 22 o geografskih raziskavah) omogoča, da nacionalni regulativni organi imenujejo „območje digitalne izključenosti“ v primeru, kadar noben operater ali javni organ ni uvedel ali ne namerava uvesti zelo visokozmogljivega omrežja, in da kaznujejo operaterje, ki ravnajo drugače, kot so navedli v času razpisa.
This mechanism will allow the regulator to gather knowledge of the areas where regulation is not delivering, and is unlikely to deliver, improvements in terms of high quality connectivity. 
Ta mehanizem bo regulatorju omogočil zbiranje informacij o območjih, na katerih Uredba ne prinaša in verjetno tudi ne bo prinesla izboljšav glede visokokakovostne povezljivosti.
Whereas the 2007-2013 programming period suffered from the lack of coordination of the ERDF broadband investments scattered between several regional and national operational programmes, under the 2014-2020 programming period the broadband rollout is co-financed under one Operational Programme Digital Poland. 
Za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 je bilo značilno pomanjkljivo usklajevanje naložb ESRR, razpršenih med več regionalnimi in nacionalnimi operativnimi programi, v programskem 4 obdobju 2014–2020 pa se uvedba širokopasovnih povezav sofinancira v okviru enega operativnega programa, Digitalna Poljska.
As a result, the current implementation of the programme is very well on track. 
Zato je trenutno izvajanje programa zelo dobro.
The text of the Operational Programme Digital Poland also envisages complementarity of the EU funds between 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 programming periods. 
V besedilu operativnega programa Digitalna Poljska je predvideno, da se bodo sredstva EU med programskimi obdobji 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 dopolnjevala.
The current programme concentrates on the last mile connections in the white areas, whereas during 2007-2013 mainly backbone and backhaul networks were supported. 
Trenutni program je osredotočen na dostopovne povezave v belih lisah, v obdobju 2007–2013 pa sta bila podprta zlasti hrbtenično in vmesno povezovalno omrežje.
What is more, the possibility of the re-financing of the potentially not finished investments of 2007-13 was clearly excluded from financing in the operational programme in order to assure the best usage of the EU funds. 
Poleg tega je bila možnost ponovnega financiranja morebitnih nedokončanih naložb v obdobju2007–2013 jasno izključena iz financiranja v operativnem programu, da bi se sredstva EU čim bolje porabila.
The Commission notes that the general take-up problem of the fast internet was recognised by the Polish authorities and is dealt, inter alia, by the 3rd priority axis of the OP Digital Poland. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da so poljski organi priznali splošno težavo z uvedbo hitrega interneta, ki jo med drugim obravnava tretja prednostna os operativnega programa Digitalna Poljska.
As to the underuse of the backbone infrastructure financed in the 2007-2013 period – the issue needs to be further analysed and effectively addressed. 
Kar zadeva premajhno izkoriščenost hrbtenične infrastrukture, financirane v obdobju 2007–2013, je treba to vprašanje dodatno analizirati in učinkovito obravnavati.
However, it is important to notice that the dialogue between telecoms and the regional administration (who owns the infrastructure) about the possibilities of better use of the regional broadband network created between 2007-13 period was already initiated by the Polish authorities in the context of the Operational Programme Digital Poland implementation. 
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da so poljski organi v okviru izvajanja operativnega programa Digitalna Poljska že začeli dialog med telekomunikacijskimi operaterji in regionalno upravo (lastnico infrastrukture) o možnostih za boljšo izkoriščenost regionalnega širokopasovnega omrežja, vzpostavljenega v obdobju 2007–2013.
A series of meetings and workshops was organised from late 2016 up to now by the national regulator Office of Electronic Communication, Ministry of Digital Affairs and Implementing Authority of Digital Poland. 
Od konca leta 2016 do zdaj so nacionalni regulator, tj. urad za elektronske komunikacije, ministrstvo za digitalne zadeve in izvajalski organ operativnega programa Digitalna Poljska organizirali vrsto srečanj in delavnic.
The European Commission monitors all the broadband objectives identified in the Digital Agenda for Europe and collects relevant data, including on the share of fixed broadband subscriptions of at least 100 Mbps (since 2010). 
Evropska komisija spremlja vse cilje glede širokopasovnih povezav, opredeljene v Evropski digitalni agendi, in zbira ustrezne podatke, tudi o deležu naročnin na fiksne širokopasovne povezave s hitrostjo vsaj 100 Mb/s (od leta 2010).
The Commission also publishes an annual digital report called the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). 
Objavlja tudi letno digitalno poročilo z naslovom Indeks digitalnega gospodarstva in družbe.
While 100 Mbps coverage and take-up data were already available, they were not included in the DESI. 
Čeprav so bili podatki o pokritosti s širokopasovnimi povezavami hitrosti 100 Mb/s in naročninah že na voljo, niso bili vključeni v indeks digitalnega gospodarstva in družbe.
For 2018, DESI will included in its country profiles ultrafast broadband (of at least 100 Mbps) coverage and take-up. 
Indeks digitalnega gospodarstva in družbe bo v profile držav za leto 2018 vključil pokritost z ultra hitro širokopasovno povezavo (vsaj 100 Mb/s) in naročnine.
Please see also Commission replies to paragraphs 31 to 33 for additional information on monitoring. 
Za dodatne informacije o spremljanju glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 31 do 33.
See Commission reply to paragraph 44 for studies supporting Germany's investment plan. 
Za študije, ki podpirajo naložbeni načrt Nemčije, glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 44.
The European Commission has insisted vis-à-vis NRAs that conditions for the deployment of vectoring technologies in access networks are adapted to the needs of alternative investors. 
Evropska komisija je v zvezi z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi vztrajala, da se pogoji za uvedbo tehnologij vektorizacije v dostopovnih omrežjih prilagodijo potrebam morebitnih vlagateljev.
The Commission recalls at the same time the ultimate responsibility in respect of deployment lies with the national regulators. 
Komisija je hkrati spomnila, da so za uvedbo končno odgovorni nacionalni regulatorji.
The Commission notes that EFSI support is meant to demonstrate additionality (please see Commission replies to paragraphs 58 to 60), which is not proven only on the basis of the high level of risk attached to a project. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da je podpora sklada EFSI namenjena dokazovanju dodatnosti (glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 58 do 60), kar pa ni dokazano le na podlagi visoke stopnje tveganja, povezane s projektom.
EFSI regulation does not require EFSI financing to be limited to white and grey areas (see article 6 of EFSI Regulation requiring that EFSI projects are "economically viable"). 
Uredba o skladu EFSI ne določa, da mora biti financiranje sklada EFSI omejeno na bele in sive lise (glej člen 6 uredbe o skladu EFSI, v skladu s katerim morajo biti projekti sklada EFSI „ekonomsko izvedljivi“).
Regarding the enforceability of the Irish NRA’s decisions, the Commission already underlined in the EU Digital Progress Report 2017 (Telecoms chapter) that "Under Irish law, ComReg is not vested with powers to impose fines, which is the courts’ prerogative. 
Kar zadeva izvršljivost odločitev irskega nacionalnega regulativnega organa, je Komisija v Poročilu o digitalnem napredku v Evropi za leto 2017 (poglavje o telekomunikacijah) že poudarila, da „ComReg v skladu z irsko zakonodajo ni pooblaščen za nalaganje glob, temveč je za to pristojno 5
Because of this, ComReg is out of step with other NRAs, and this appears to present obstacles to timely and effective intervention". 
sodišče. Zato ComReg ni usklajen z drugimi nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi, kar očitno ovira pravočasno in učinkovito posredovanje“.
The expected amendments to comply with the Telecom Single Market Regulation shall contribute to improve the situation. 
Pričakovane spremembe bodo zaradi uskladitve z uredbo o enotnem telekomunikacijskem trgu prispevale k izboljšanju stanja.
In addition, in its Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Electronic Communications Code the Commission proposed in article 29 that Member States should enable their NRA to impose penalties to enforce their decisions. 
Poleg tega je Komisija v členu 29 predloga Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o Evropskem zakoniku o elektronskih komunikacijah predlagala, da bi morale države članice nacionalnim regulativnim organom omogočiti, da naložijo kazni za izvrševanje svojih odločitev.
See also Commission replies to paragraphs 63 to 69. 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 63 do 69.
See Commission replies to paragraphs 76 and 78. 
Glej odgovora Komisije na odstavka 76 in 78.
Recommendations (1) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Priporočila (1) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
See Commission reply to recommendation 2) regarding the mode of implementation by the Commission of this recommendation. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na priporočilo (2) glede načina izvajanja tega priporočila s strani Komisije.
(2) The Commission notes that this recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
(2) Komisija ugotavlja, da je to priporočilo naslovljeno na države članice.
Insofar as the Commission is concerned, in its Communication "Connectivity for a Competitive Digital Single Market - Towards a European Gigabit Society" (COM(2016) 587 final), it defined three strategic objectives for 2025 and called on Member States to review progress of their National Broadband Plans and update them by the end of 2017 with a time horizon of 2025, in line with the strategic objectives set in this Communication and the 5G Action Plan. 
Kar zadeva Komisijo, je v sporočilu z naslovom Povezljivost za konkurenčen enotni digitalni trg – evropski gigabitni družbi naproti (COM(2016) 587 final) opredelila tri strateške cilje za leto 2025 in države članice pozvala, naj pregledajo napredek pri svojih nacionalnih načrtih za širokopasovne povezave ter jih do konca leta 2017 posodobijo za obdobje do leta 2025 v skladu s strateškimi cilji iz tega sporočila in akcijskega načrta za 5G.
In this respect, discussions on the implementation of the 5G Action Plan and Gigabit strategy have started in a dedicated Working Group with Member States representatives. 
V zvezi s tem so se v namenski delovni skupini s predstavniki držav članic začele razprave o izvajanju akcijskega načrta za 5G in gigabitne strategije.
(3) The Commission partially accepts the recommendation and notes that at this stage it is not in a position to make specific commitments in relation to legislative proposals for the post 2020 period, inter alia due to uncertainties about the future thematic coverage of the different Funds co-financing the operational programmes. 
(3) Komisija delno sprejema priporočilo in ugotavlja, da v tej fazi ne more sprejeti posebnih zavez glede zakonodajnih predlogov za obdobje po letu 2020, med drugim zaradi negotovosti o prihodnji tematski pokritosti različnih skladov, s katerimi se sofinancirajo operativni programi.
The Commission is looking into different possibilities for establishing a more streamlined, simplified and harmonised system of indicators across ESI Funds for the post-2020 Multi annual Financial Framework (MFF), including by way of relying on common indicators as much as possible, where practicable, in the policy fields covered by the Funds' interventions. 
Komisija proučuje različne možnosti za vzpostavitev bolj racionalnega, poenostavljenega in usklajenega sistema kazalnikov v okviru skladov ESI za večletni finančni okvir po letu 2020, vključno s čim večjim opiranjem na skupne kazalnike, če je to mogoče, na področjih politik, ki jih pokrivajo ukrepi skladov.
(4) The Commission notes that this recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
(4) Komisija ugotavlja, da je to priporočilo naslovljeno na države članice.
Insofar as the Commission is concerned in supporting this process, in its proposal for revised EU telecom rules it has proposed enhanced provisions on the independence and regulatory capacity of NRAs responsible for ex ante market regulation, including available resources Furthermore, the Commission proposed the harmonisation of a minimum list of tasks which Member States should assign to the NRAs (in view of their political independence and expertise), to ensure that they are vested with powers in all areas necessary to achieve their objectives. 
Kolikor se podpiranje tega procesa nanaša na Komisijo, je v svojem predlogu o revidiranih predpisih EU o telekomunikacijah predlagala okrepljene določbe o neodvisnosti in regulativni zmogljivosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov, odgovornih za predhodno urejanje trga, vključno z razpoložljivimi sredstvi. Poleg tega je Komisija predlagala uskladitev najmanjšega seznama nalog, ki bi jih morale države članice dodeliti nacionalnim regulativnim organom (glede na njihovo politično neodvisnost in strokovno znanje), da se jim zagotovijo pooblastila na vseh področjih, ki so potrebna za doseganje njihovih ciljev.
Moreover, in order to ensure that NRAs have the necessary powers to enforce their decisions the Commission proposed that, within the limits of national constitutional law, NRAs have the power to directly impose penalties. 
Da bi se nacionalnim regulativnim organom zagotovila potrebna pooblastila za izvrševanje njihovih odločitev, je Komisija predlagala tudi, da bi se ti organi pooblastili, da v mejah nacionalnega ustavnega prava neposredno naložijo kazni.
(5) The Commission accepts this recommendation and considers it partially implemented as explained below. 
(5)Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in meni, da je delno izvedeno, kot je pojasnjeno v nadaljevanju.
The Commission already provides substantial guidance for Member States for the application of State Aid for broadband and will continue to do so. 
Komisija državam članicam že zagotavlja pomembne smernice za uporabo državne pomoči za širokopasovno povezavo in jih bo zagotavljala še naprej.
In particular: (i) DG COMP encourages pre-notification meetings (from 2016 until today, DG COMP provided advice for 23 pre-notifications from 13 Member States); (ii) DG COMP created a dedicated platform, eState aid Wiki where all Member States can ask questions on the application of the GBER and the State aid Grids; (iii) an analytical grid for the application of State aid rules for broadband is presented on DG COMP's website; (iv) Commission State aid decisions are published on DG COMP's website; 6 
Zlasti: (i) GD COMP spodbuja sestanke pred priglasitvijo (od leta 2016 do danes je svetoval v zvezi s 23 predhodnimi priglasitvami iz 13 držav članic); 6
One aim of the conditions is to avoid overbuilding of good private investment, for which an assessment of available infrastructure is always needed, even though Member States do not always prepare this well. 
Eden od ciljev pogojev je, da bi se izogibali preobremenitvi dobrih zasebnih naložb, za katere je vedno potrebna ocena razpoložljive infrastrukture, čeprav države članice tega vedno ne pripravijo dobro.
In the context of updating the Commission's guide on very high-speed broadband investment, the Commission intends to include further information on granting aid in grey and black areas, especially with regard to the 100 Mbps and the Gigabit society targets, so that Member States would have even more clarity on the subject. 
Komisija namerava v okviru posodobitve vodnika o naložbah v zelo hitre širokopasovne povezave vključiti dodatne informacije o dodeljevanju pomoči v sivih in črnih lisah, zlasti v zvezi s ciljem glede 100 MB/s in gigabitne družbe, da bodo imele države članice v zvezi s tem na voljo še več informacij.
(6) The Commission accepts this recommendation and considers it partially implemented as explained below. 
(6)Komisija sprejema to priporočilo in meni, da je delno izvedeno, kot je pojasnjeno v nadaljevanju.
In order to incentivize the deployment of very high capacity networks, in particular in economically less viable areas such as low population density/rural areas, the Commission has already proposed to introduce in the revised EU telecom rules, currently being negotiated between the EU co-legislators - a specific article dealing with wholesale-only undertakings. 
Da bi se spodbudila uporaba zelo visokozmogljivih omrežij, zlasti na gospodarsko manj uspešnih področjih, kot so območja z nizko gostoto prebivalstva in podeželska območja, je Komisija že predlagala, da se v revidirane predpise EU o telekomunikacijah, o katerih trenutno potekajo pogajanja med sozakonodajalcema EU, uvede poseben člen, ki obravnava izključno veleprodajna podjetja.
This proposal aims to incentivise investment through the definition of a simplified regulatory model proposed for wholesale-only networks with a significant market position, limited to fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory access rules. 
S tem predlogom bi se morale spodbuditi naložbe z opredelitvijo poenostavljenega regulativnega modela, predlaganega za izključno veleprodajna omrežja s pomembnim tržnim položajem, ki je omejen na pravična, razumna in nediskriminatorna pravila o dostopu.
The Commission will monitor the transposition of this measure. 
Komisija bo spremljala prenos tega ukrepa v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Indeed, State Aid rules already require effective wholesale access to subsidized infrastructure in all areas (white, grey or black). 
V pravilih o državni pomoči se že zahteva učinkovit veleprodajni dostop do subvencionirane infrastrukture na vseh lisah (belih, sivih ali črnih).
Moreover wholesale only projects are already considered especially pro-competitive and treated favourably under State aid rules. 
Poleg tega se za izključno veleprodajne projekte že šteje, da krepijo konkurenčnost in so v okviru pravil o državni pomoči ugodno obravnavani.
For instance, competitive procedures to award State aid can award additional points to wholesale only projects. 
V konkurenčnih postopkih za dodelitev državne pomoči se lahko na primer dodelijo dodatne točke izključno veleprodajnim projektom.
The forthcoming Guide on Broadband investment will provide additional guidance (notably updating the section on business models already provided in the Guide to High-speed Broadband investment) and highlight these aspects. 
Prihodnji vodnik o naložbah v širokopasovne povezave bo zagotovil dodatna navodila (zlasti s posodobitvijo oddelka o poslovnih modelih, ki so že predvideni v vodniku za naložbe v hitre širokopasovne povezave) in poudaril te vidike.
(7) The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
(7) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission will provide guidance and disseminate best practices on the matter recommended by the ECA as well as on other relevant investment issues through the activity of the Broadband Competence Offices Network and its review of it Broadband Investment Guide. 
Komisija bo zagotovila smernice in razširjala najboljše prakse o zadevi, ki jo priporoča Računsko sodišče, pa tudi o drugih pomembnih naložbenih vprašanjih prek dejavnosti mreže kompetenčnih uradov za širokopasovne povezave in svojega pregleda vodnika o naložbah v širokopasovne povezave.
The Commission will in particular clarify the risks and opportunities attached to the different size of projects, different technologies and investment, models with a view to improve the viability of investment, promote competition, facilitate penetration and ease access to long-term financing. 
Zlasti bo pojasnila tveganja in priložnosti, povezane z različno velikostjo projektov, različnimi tehnologijami in naložbenimi modeli, da bi se izboljšala izvedljivost naložb, spodbudila konkurenca ter olajšala gostota širokopasovnih povezav in dostop do dolgoročnega financiranja.
(8) The EIB considers that grant-type public sector support is most needed for projects that no private investor is ready to support because of their lack of economic viability. 
(8) Evropska investicijska banka meni, da je podpora javnega sektorja v obliki nepovratnih sredstev najpotrebnejša pri projektih, ki jih ni pripravljen podpreti noben zasebni vlagatelj, ker niso ekonomsko izvedljivi.
According to Article 6(1)(a) of the EFSI Regulation 2015/1017, EFSI should target projects that are economically viable, as confirmed by a cost-benefit analysis. 
V skladu s členom 6(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) 2015/1017 o skladu EFSI bi moral biti sklad EFSI usmerjen v projekte, ki so ekonomsko izvedljivi, kot se potrdi z analizo stroškov in koristi.
The Commission notes that the draft CEBF investment guidelines already foresee that the Fund should provide support for up to EUR30 million to one single company and generally to greenfield broadband projects, predominantly in white and grey areas. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da je v osnutku smernic za naložbe CEBF že predvideno, da bi moral Sklad zagotoviti podporo v višini do 30 milijonov EUR eni sami družbi in na splošno za nove projekte širokopasovne povezave, zlasti na belih in sivih lisah.
Furthermore, the Commission has already taken steps to agree with the CEBF Fund Manager on appropriate reporting obligations, which are to be still defined in a Side Letter. 
Poleg tega je Komisija že sprejela ukrepe za dogovor z upravljavcem sklada CEBF glede ustreznih obveznosti poročanja, ki jih je treba še določiti v spremnem dopisu.
The profile of the projects supported by the CEBF (greenfield projects undertaken by smaller project promoters) is in line with our interest to deploy in underserved (grey and white) areas. 7 
Profil projektov, ki jih podpira CEBF (novi projekti, ki jih izvajajo manjši nosilci projektov), je v skladu z našim interesom za uvedbo na območjih, na katerih potrebe niso ustrezno izpolnjene (na sivih in belih lisah).