natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, with regard to the regularity of payments authorised during 2011, the Court: (a) assessed the reservations made in the AARs; (b) checked the consistency and accuracy of the Commission’s calculation of the residual error rate and the amounts of ‘payments at risk’. 
Glede pravilnosti plačil, odobrenih v letu 2011, je zlasti: (a) ocenilo pridržke, izražene v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih; (b) preverilo doslednost in točnost izračunov stopnje preostale napake in zneskov „tveganih plačil“.
DG Regional Policy 5.66. DGRegionalPolicyestimatedthatbetween3,1%and 6,8% of the interim payments for the 2007-2013 programming period authorised during 2011 (the latter amounted to approximately 29,8 billion euro in total) were at risk of error. 
GD za regionalno politiko 5.66 GD za regionalno politiko je ocenil, da obstaja tveganje napake pri 3,1 % do 6,8 % vmesnih plačil za programsko obdobje 2007–2013, ki so bila odobrena v letu 2011 (zadnja so skupaj znašala približno 29,8 milijarde EUR).
This assessment of the ‘payments at risk’ includes all OPs; those under reservation as well as those not under reservation. 
Ta ocena „tveganih plačil“ vključuje vse operativne programe, tako tiste, za katere je bil izražen pridržek, kot tiste, za katere ni bil.
The number of OPs subject to reser­ vation by DG Regional Policy increased in 2011 compared to 2010 from 98 to 123. 
Število operativnih programov, za katere je GD za regionalno politiko izrazil pridržek, se je v letu 2011 v primer­ javi z letom 2010 povečalo, in sicer z 98 na 123.
This was due to a stricter assessment by the Commission. 
To je bila posledica strožjega ocenjevanja Komisije.
In total, the scope of the financial reser­ vations made by DG Regional Policy represented 31 % of the total payment appropriations authorised during the year. 
Obseg finančnih pridržkov, ki jih je izrazil GD za regionalno politiko, je pred­ stavljal 31 % vseh odobritev za plačila, odobrenih med letom.
The Commission considers that in all cases referred to quoted by the Court’s assessment the remaining risks are being adequately covered during the ongoing closure process. 
Po mnenju Komisije so preostala tveganja v vseh omenjenih primerih, ki jih v oceni navaja Sodišče, med potekajočim procesom zaključevanja zadostno obravnavana.
The Commission services have made a thorough assessment of the closure documents and have taken the necessary measures to address the issues identified, including the interruption of the closure process, the request of additional information, the performance of closure audits and eventually for some programmes the application of financial corrections (see also Commission reply to paragraph 5.61(c)). 
Službe Komisije so podrobno ocenile zaključne dokumente in izvedle ustrezne ukrepe za obravnavo ugotovljenih vprašanj, vključno s prekinitvijo procesa zaključevanja, zahtevo po dodatnih informacijah, izvedbo zaključnih revizij in za nekatere programe sčasoma tudi izvedbo finančnih popravkov (glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 5.61(c)).
5.66. The Commission welcomes the Court’s reference to the Commission’s stricter assessment of the amounts at risk, which was intended to address observations made by the Court in its former Annual Reports. 
5.64 O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 5.66 Komisija je zadovoljna, da se Sodišče sklicuje na njeno strožje ocenjevanje tveganih zneskov, ki je bilo namenjeno obravnavi ugotovitev Sodišča v njegovih prejšnjih letnih poročilih.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/141 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 5.67. TheCourtnotesthatDGRegionalPolicyissuedreser­ vations for those OPs of the 2000-2006 programming period for which the Member State had not yet adequately corrected weaknesses identified during the closure process. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/141 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 5.67 Sodišče opaža, da je GD za regionalno politiko izrazil pridržke za tiste operativne programe iz programskega obdobja 2000–2006, za katere država članica še ni ustrezno odpravila slabosti, ki so bile ugotovljene med procesom zaklju­ čevanja.
The Commission did not quantify these reservations (which are referred to by the Commission as reservations for ‘reputational reasons’). 
Komisija teh pridržkov (ki jih imenuje pridržki zaradi „poslovnega ugleda“) ni količinsko opredelila.
As shown by the Court’s work there remains a risk that the closure might be based on unreliable closure documents leading to insufficient financial corrections (see paragraphs 5.60 to 5.61 and Special Report No 3/2012, para­ graphs 65 to 67). DG Mobility and Transport and DG Energy 5.68. 
Kot kaže delo Sodišča, še vedno obstaja tveganje, da bo zaključevanje teme­ ljilo na nezanesljivih zaključnih dokumentih, kar lahko privede do nezadostnih finančnih popravkov (glej odstavka 5.60 in 5.61 ter odstavke 65 do 67 Posebnega poročila št. 3/2012).
DG Mobility and Transport and DG Energy estimated that approximately 4,5 % of payments authorised during 2011 in relation to the sixth and the seventh framework programmes for research and technological development were affected by errors. 
GD za mobilnost in promet ter GD za energetiko 5.68 GDzamobilnostinprometterGDzaenergetikosta ocenila, da so napake vplivale na približno 4,5% plačil, odobrenih v letu 2011 v zvezi s šestim in sedmim okvirnim programom za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj.
Accordingly, reservations were issued for each of these two expenditure programmes by both DGs. 
V skladu s tem sta oba generalna direktorata izrazila pridržke za oba programa odhodkov.
In total, the reservations made by DG Mobility and Transport and DG Energy cover respectively 25,7 % and 18,8 % of the total payment appropriations authorised during the year. 
Pridržek, ki ga je izrazil GD za mobilnost in promet, se nanaša na 25,7% vseh odobritev plačil, odobrenih med letom, pridržek, ki ga je izrazil GD za energe­ tiko pa na 18,8 %.
The combined impact of these two reservations represented 0,9 % and 0,8 % of the payments authorised by DG Mobility and Transport and DG Energy, respectively. 
Skupni učinek obeh pridržkov je predsta­ vljal 0,9 % plačil, ki jih je odobril GD za mobilnost in promet, in 0,8 % plačil, ki jih je odobril GD za energetiko.
TheCourtnotedthefollowingissues: (a) for both DG Mobility and Transport and DG Energy the Court considers that the amount of ‘payments at risk’ is understated for the part of expenditure related to the seventh framework programme. 
5.69 Sodišče je ugotovilo naslednje: (a) tako za GD za mobilnost in promet kot za GD za ener­ getiko meni, da je pri odhodkih, povezanih s sedmim okvirnim programom, znesek „tveganih plačil“ podcenjen.
In both cases the reser­ vation concerning the seventh framework programme (FP7) is based on the results of the audits carried out by DG Research and DG Information Society. 
V obeh primerih pridržek v zvezi s sedmim okvirnim programom (OP7) temelji na rezultatih revizij, ki sta jih opravila GD za raziskave in GD za informacijsko družbo.
Audits by DG Mobility and Transport and DG Energy for FP7 projects had however shown error rates significantly above the estimated error rate for the framework programme as a whole; (b) for DG Energy, the Court considers that the scope of the audit work carried out in relation to the EEPR in 2011 is insufficient concerning public procurement. 
Vendar so revizije GD za mobilnost in promet ter GD za energetiko pri projektih OP7 pokazale bistveno višje stopnje napake, kot je ocenjena stopnja napake za okvirni program kot celoto; (b) za GD za energetiko meni, da je obseg revizijskega dela, ki ga je v letu 2011 izvedel v zvezi z EEPO, na področju javnega naročanja nezadosten.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 5.67. As indicated in its reply to paragraph 5.62, the Commission considers that its closure procedure has allowed iden­ tifying remaining material risks at closure. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 5.67 Komisija v skladu s svojo navedbo v odgovoru na odstavek 5.62 meni, da je njen proces zaključevanja omogočil odkrivanje preostalih materialnih tveganj ob zaključevanju.
The Commission has mitigating actions in place to address the risks identified at closure. 
Komisija je sprejela blažilne ukrepe za obvladovanje tveganj, ugotovljenih ob zaključeva­ nju.
Based on its risk assessment, the Commission carries out specific closure audits to verify and validate the quality of the winding-up declaration. 
Na podlagi svoje ocene tveganja izvaja posebne zaključne revizije za preverjanje in potrjevanje kakovosti izjav o zaključku pomoči.
The information provided by the winding-up body (WUB) is based on the cumulative audit information originating from all audit sources (national, Court and Commission audits), including from additional audits carried out at clo¬sure by the winding-up body when necessary. 
Informacije, ki jih je predložil organ, ki zaključuje pomoč, temeljijo na skupnih revizijskih informacijah iz vseh revizijskih virov (nacionalnih revizij ter revizij Sodišča in Komisije), vključno z dodatnimi revizi­ jami, ki jih ob zaključevanju po potrebi izvede organ, ki zaključuje pomoč.
5.69. (a) The Commission considers that both Directorates-General followed the standing instructions when quantifying the amount at risk for FP7 by using the best information available. 
5.69 (a) Komisija meni, da sta oba generalna direktorata pri količinskem opredeljevanju tveganega zneska za sedmi okvirni program sledila ustaljenim navodilom, pri čemer sta uporabila najboljše možne informacije, ki so bile na voljo.
As this was found to be not sufficiently represen­ tative, the Commission considered it appropriate to use the results of the considerably larger number of random, represen­ tative FP7 audits conducted by Research and Innovation DG and Information Society and Media DG. 
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da ta vzorec ni dovolj reprezentativen, je Komisija menila, da je primerno upora­ biti rezultate precej večjega števila naključnih, reprezentativnih revizij sedmega okvirnega programa, ki sta jih izvedla GD za raziskave in inovacije ter GD za informacijsko družbo in medije.
From 2012, the Commission DGs managing research projects will have a Common Representative Audit Sample for FP7. (b) The Commission will take into account the Court’s observation in its audit of each of the 65 beneficiaries of EEPR funds during the lifetime of the EEPR. 
Od leta 2012 bodo imeli generalni direktorati Komisije, ki upravljajo z raziskovalnimi projekti, skupni reprezentativni revi­ zijski vzorec za sedmi okvirni program. (b) Komisija bo v času trajanja Evropskega energetskega programa za oživitev (EEPO) upoštevala opažanje Sodišča v njegovih revi­ zijah vsakega od 65 upravičencev sredstev EEPO.
EN C 344/142 Official Journal of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions 5.70. Based on its audit work, the Court concludes that the interim and final payments for the year ended 31 December 2011 for the policy group regional policy, energy and transport were affected by material error. 
SL C 344/142 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA Zaključki 5.70 Sodišče je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela prišlo do zaključka, da so na vmesna in končna plačila za skupino politik regionalna politika, energetika in promet za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2011, vplivale pomembne napake.
5.71. Based on its audit work on the examined supervisory and control systems, the Court found that: (a) audit authorities were partially effective in ensuring the regularity of operations for the ERDF, ESF and CF of the 2007-2013 programming period; (b) the procedures of the Commission and Member States have been partially effective in carrying out the initial phase of the closure process for the 2000-2006 programming period. 
5.71 Sodišče je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela pri pregledanih nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemih, ugotovilo: (a) da so bili revizijski organi delno uspešni pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti dejavnosti za ESRR, ESS in KS v programskem obdobju 2007–2013; (b) da so bili postopki Komisije in držav članic delno uspešni pri izvajanju začetne faze procesa zaključevanja za programsko obdobje 2000–2006.
The Court’s audits have shown that there is no assurance that financial correction mechanisms compensate for all OPs in an adequate manner the errors uncovered and that all material issues are resolved. 
5.72 Revizije,kijihjeopraviloSodišče,kažejo,danizago­ tovila, da mehanizmi finančnih popravkov pri vseh operativnih programih ustrezno nadomestijo škodo, ki jo povzročijo odkrite napake, in da se rešijo vsa pomembna vprašanja.
There is equally no evidence that financial correction mechanisms necessarily translate into lasting improvements to systems which will prevent recurrence of the errors uncovered (33). _____________ (33) See the 2010 Annual Report, paragraph 1.25; and Special Report No 3/2012. 
Prav tako ni dokazov, da mehanizmi finančnih popravkov vedno trajno izboljšajo sisteme, kar bi preprečilo ponavljanje ugotovljenih napak (33). _____________ (33) Glej letno poročilo za proračunsko leto 2010, odstavek 1.25, in Posebno poročilo št. 3/2012.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 5.70. The Commission notes the considerable decrease in the error rate compared to last year which confirms a positive development for the third consecutive year. 
12.11.2012 O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E Komisija ugotavlja, da se je stopnja napak v primerjavi z lanskim letom občutno znižala, kar potrjuje pozitiven razvoj že tretje leto zapored.
The Commission considers that this is in particular a result of its strict policy of interruptions/suspensions when deficiencies are ident­ ified, in line with its 2008 Action Plan. 
Komisija meni, da je tak rezultat dosežen še posebej zaradi njene stroge politike pri prekinitvah plačilnih rokov in začasnih ustavitev plačil, če so odkrite pomanjkljivosti, kar je v skladu z njenim akcij­ skim načrtom iz leta 2008.
The Commission is taking measures to correct the errors detected by the Court including by applying financial corrections where appro­ priate, and focuses its actions on the most risky programmes and/or Member States (1). 
Komisija sprejema ukrepe za odpravo napak, ki jih je odkrilo Sodišče, tudi z uvajanjem finančnih popravkov, kjer je to potrebno, in se pri tem osredotoča na najbolj tvegane programe in/ali države članice (1).
5.71. (a) The Commission underlines that the effectiveness and quality of the work of audit authorities differs by programme and Member State, as shown by the Court’s assessment in paragraph 5.41 and by the results of the Commission’s audit work. 
5.71 (a) Komisija poudarja, da se uspešnost in kakovost dela revizijskih organov razlikujeta glede na program in državo članico, kot je prikazano v oceni Sodišča v odstavku 5.41 in rezultatih revizij­ skega dela Komisije.
In accordance with Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, the Commission is as from July 2012 formally relying on the work of 13 audit authorities for ERDF/CF and 9 audit auth­ orities for ESF. 
V skladu s členom 73 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 se Komisija od julija 2012 uradno lahko opre na delo 13 revizijskih organov za področje ESRR/KS in 9 revizijskih organov za področje ESS.
The Commission will continue to review the work of the remaining audit authorities and to monitor the situation for programmes for which an Article 73 letter was granted. (b) The Commission considers to have established robust procedures and guidance for the closure process, and considers that most Member States have carried out important and professional work to enable the closure of programmes and to increase assurance at closure. 
Komisija bo še naprej pregledovala delo preostalih revizijskih organov in spremljala stanje programov, za katere je bilo odobreno pismo na podlagi člena 73. (b) Komisija meni, da je vzpostavila robustne postopke in navodila za proces zaključevanja ter da je večina držav članic s pomembnim in strokovnim delom omogočila zaključevanje programov in povečanje zagotovila ob zaključevanju.
The Commission also considers to have made a compre­ hensive work at closure, analysing thoroughly all closure docu­ ments, carrying out additional audits and enquiries where necessary, which has led in many cases to additional financial corrections being applied at closure to address remaining risks. 5.72. 
Komisija tudi meni, da je ob zaključevanju opravila obsežno delo: podrobno je analizirala vse zaključne dokumente, po potrebi izvedla dodatne revizije in poizvedbe, to pa je v mnogih primerih privedlo do uvedbe finančnih popravkov ob zaključevanju, s čimer so bila odpravljena preostala tveganja.
The multiannual nature of expenditure and control cycle includes the closure process, where final checks are performed on the legality and regularity of expenditure and final corrections are made where necessary. 
5.72 Večletna narava odhodkovnega in kontrolnega cikla vključuje proces zaključevanja, pri katerem se še zadnjič preverita zakonitost in pravilnost odhodkov, kjer pa je potrebno, se izvedejo finančni popravki.
The closure process for 2007-2013 programmes will be further strengthened compared to the 2000-2006 period considering in particular reinforced requirements for the audit of a representative statistical sample on a yearly basis and the annual opinions. _____________ (1) As demonstrated in the Staff Working Document ‘Analysis of errors in the Cohesion Policy for the years 2006-2009’ (cf SEC(2011) 1179 of 5.10.2011) and in DG Regional Policy's AAR for 2011. 
Proces zaključevanja za programe v obdobju 2007–2013 bo v primerjavi z obdobjem 2000–2006 še bolj okrepljen ob upoštevanju okrepljenih zahtev za letno revizijo reprezentativnega statističnega vzorca in letna mnenja. _____________ (1) Kot je prikazano v delovnem dokumentu služb Komisije, Analysis of errors in the Cohesion Policy for the years 2006-2009 (Analiza napak v kohezijski politiki za obdobje 2006–2009) (prim. SEC(2011) 1179 z dne 5. oktobra 2011) in v poročilu o dejavnostih GD za regionalno politiko za leto 2011. 5.70
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/143 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S Moreover, for a limited number of OPs, the Commission’s audits also demonstrated that programmes authorities still need to improve their management and control systems despite corrections applied. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/143 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E Poleg tega so revizije Komisije pri omejenem številu operativnih programov pokazale tudi, da morajo organi, pristojni za programe, kljub uvedenim popravkom še izboljšati svoje upravljavske in kontrolne sisteme.
In such cases additional actions by the Commission, such as interruptions or suspensions are applied. 
V takih primerih Komisija uvede dodatne ukrepe, kot so prekinitve plačilnih rokov in začasne ustavitve plačil.
The Commission has proposed in the 2014-2020 legal framework to increase the possibility to make net financial corrections. 
Komisija je v pravnem okviru za obdobje 2014–2020 predlagala možnost neto finančnih popravkov.
See joint reply to paragraphs 1.12 and 1.13. 
See joint reply to paragraphs 1.12 and 1.13.
5.73. The Commission considers that Member States should have the right to substitute ineligible expenditure they detect with legal and regular one in order to optimise the use of Cohesion spending, which contributes to its added value and to ensure efficient controls at Member State level. 
5.73 Po mnenju Komisije bi morale imeti države članice pravico nadome­ stiti ugotovljene neupravičene odhodke z zakonitimi in pravilnimi zaradi optimizacije porabe na področju kohezije, kar prispeva k njeni dodani vrednosti in zagotavljanju učinkovitih kontrol na ravni držav članic.
The Commission’s proposal for the 2014-2020 regulatory framework provides that ‘Where irregularities affecting annual accounts sent to the Commission are detected by the Commission or by the European Court of Auditors, the resulting financial correction shall reduce support from the Funds to the operational programme (Article 137(6))’ thereby limiting the possibilities of withdrawal/replacement to the ongoing financial year. 
Predlog Komisije za regulativni okvir za obdobje 2014–2020 določa, da „kadar Komisija ali Evropsko računsko sodišče odkrije nepravilnosti, ki vplivajo na letne računovodske izkaze, poslane Komisiji, se s finančnim popravkom zmanjša podpora iz skladov za operativni program (člen 137(6))“, kar omejuje možnosti umika/nadomestitve na tekoče proračunsko leto.
This provision is intended as an incentive for expenditure included in the annual certified accounts to be legal and regular. 
Namen te določbe je spodbuditi, da so odhodki, ki so zajeti v potrjene letne računovodske izkaze, zakoniti in pravilni.
The Commission has made considerable efforts to ensure strict compliance with eligibility requirements and the correct application of public procurement rules. 
Komisija si je zelo prizadevala za zagotovitev strogega izpolnjevanja zahtev za upravičenost in pravilne uporabe pravil javnega naročanja.
For example: — For regional policy, it has provided training and guidance on eligibility rules to programme managing authorities to ensure they transmit this knowledge to all bodies in charge of managing the funds. 
Na primer: — Za regionalno politiko je organom, ki upravljajo s programi, pripravila usposabljanje in navodila glede zahtev za upravičenost, s čimer je želela zagotoviti, da to znanje prenesejo vsem organom, pristojnim za upravljanje sredstev.
Moreover, when it identifies complex rules at programme level, the Commission makes recommendations to simplify the rules. 
Če Komisija poleg tega na programski ravni odkrije kompleksna pravila, izda tudi priporočila za njihovo poenostavitev.
It has also shared with Member States an analysis of the types of procurement errors detected by EU audits in cohesion policy during previous years and has launched an exercise to collect best practices and possible answers by Member States to remedy such errors and reduce their occurrence. Recommendations 5.73. 
Skupaj z državami članicami je naredila analizo o vrstah napak pri javnem naročanju, ki so bile v prete­ klih letih odkrite med revizijami EU na področju kohezijske poli­ tike, ter začela zbirati najboljše prakse in možne odzive držav članic za odpravo takih napak in zmanjšanje njihove pojavnosti.
TheCourtrecommendsthattheCommission: — Recommendation 1: makes sanction systems more effective by increasing the impact of financial corrections and by reducing the possibility of replacing the ineligible expenditure with other expenditure, as proposed by the Commission in the area of cohesion for the next programming period. 
Priporočila 5.73 Sodišče Komisiji priporoča, naj: — priporočilo 1: poveča učinek finančnih popravkov in zmanjša možnosti za nadomeščanje neupravičenih odhodkov z drugimi odhodki, tako da bo sistem sankcij učinkovitejši, kar je za naslednje programsko obdobje pred­ lagala Komisija za področje kohezije.
There should be a presumption that any irregularity detected subsequent to presentation of the annual accounts will lead to a net financial correc­ tion. — Recommendation 2: requires strict compliance with the eligibility requirements for EU funding, in particular the correct application of EU and national public procurement rules. 
Vsi udeleženci bi morali predpostavljati, da bo vsaka nepravilnost, odkrita po predstavitvi letnih računovodskih izkazov, povzročila neto finančni popravek, — priporočilo 2: zahteva strogo izpolnjevanje zahtev za upravičenost do financiranja EU, zlasti pravilno uporabo pravil javnega naročanja, ki veljajo na ravni EU in na nacio­ nalni ravni,