natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The new area would connect existing subsites. for this reason the main measure of the grant agreement was the purchase of land in three core subsites in order to interlink the existing state-owned parcels and to create the preconditions for implementing rehumidification measures. due to strong opposition from local farmers, the project had to be amended: Zone 2 of 52 ha had to be dropped and only 80,5 ha (78 %) instead of the planned 103 ha could be purchased in the other two zones. 
Zato je bil glavni ukrep sporazuma o donaciji nakup zemljišča na treh ključnih podobmočjih, da bi se med seboj povezale obstoječe parcele, ki so v državni lasti, in ustvarili predpogoji za izvedbo ukrepov ponovnega vlaženja. projekt je bilo treba spremeniti zaradi močnega nasprotovanja lokalnih kmetov: območje 2, ki je merilo 52 ha, je bilo treba opustiti, na drugih dveh območjih pa je bilo namesto načrtovanih 103 ha mogoče kupiti le 80,5 ha (78 %).
The final results of the project approved by the selection procedure show, however, that the project failed as regards the achievement of the original objectives of revitalising fens and wetlands, on the one hand, and connecting the different biotopes on the other hand. instead, measures on raised bogs were carried out that still included some of the targeted species, but with a completely new set of habitats and project sites. special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 34. 
Za nadomestitev izgube površine je bilo sprejeto drugo podobmočje, katerega cilj pa ni bila obnovitev mokrišča, ampak obnovitev visokega barja. vendar končni rezultati projekta, odobrenega z izbirnim postopkom, kažejo, da projekt ni bil uspešen pri uresničitvi prvotnih ciljev, ki so bili na eni strani ponovno oživiti nizko barje in mokrišča, na drugi strani pa povezati različne biotope. namesto tega so bili izvedeni ukrepi za visoko barje, ki so še vedno zajemali nekatere ciljne vrste, vendar s popolnoma novim sklopom habitatov in projektnih območij. posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
The audit revealed nine cases of costly investments in items with very limited utility or with no tangible impact on the species and habitats conservation status (see Box 3). 
34. pri reviziji je bilo odkritih devet primerov dragih naložb v zadeve, katerih uporabnost je bila zelo omejena ali pa niso imele opri-jemljivega učinka na stanje ohranjenosti vrst in habitatov (glej okvir 3).
35. progress towards a more favourable conservation status can only be assessed if targeted and indicative species are monitored. The beneficiary is not only required to report on projects physically completed but also on changes in the conservation status of fragile species or habitats during the project implementation. however, the monitoring carried out by many beneficiaries concentrated on the measurement of project outputs (see Box 4). box 3 box 4 22 Action not cost-effective The main objective of a project was to reduce or to eliminate the risk of collision and of electrocution of birds with the electricity network. one action visited concerned the development of a new 1,9 km underground medium tension line to replace a former overhead line at the cost of 66 000 euros. however, the overhead line was no longer in use as the sole customer had become bankrupt many years previously, and consequently the building which the cable supplied was no longer being used. 
35. napredek pri vzpostavljanju ugodnejšega stanja ohranjenosti je mogoče oceniti le, če se spremljajo ciljne in indikativne vrste. upravičenec ni dolžan poročati le o fizično zaključenih projektih, ampak tudi o spremembah stanja ohranjenosti občutljivih vrst ali habitatov med izvajanjem projektov. vendar je bilo spremljanje, ki so ga izvajali številni upravičenci, osredotočeno na merjenje izložkov projektov (glej okvir 4).
This project took an unusual approach by flooding the whole bog, the success of which was even called into question by the monitoring team on several occasions. however, while the beneficiary reported regularly on the increased water levels achieved, there was no collection of data on the impact of these changes on the indicative species, such as sphagnum, in order to provide evidence to show whether the objective of the project i.e. the development of targeted raised bogs, had been achieved. 
OkVIr 3 OkVIr 4 22 strOškOVnO neUčInkOVIt UkreP Glavni cilj projekta je bil zmanjšati ali odpraviti tveganje, da bi ptice trčile v električno omrežje in poginile zaradi stika z elektriko. eden od obiskanih ukrepov je zadeval izgradnjo nove 1,9 km dolge podzemne napeljave srednje napetosti, ki bi zamenjala prejšnjo nadzemno napeljavo, stala pa bi 66 000 eur. vendar se nadzemna napeljava ni več uporabljala, saj je njen edini uporabnik že pred leti bankrotiral, zato se zgradba z električnim dovodom ni več uporabljala. ker ni bilo nobenega jamstva, da se bo elektrika uporabljala, se zamenjava neuporabljenih nadzemnih električnih vodov ne bi smela financirati s sredstvi LIFe. nezadOstnO sPremljanje rezUltatOV PrOjektOV cilj projekta, ki je prejel pomoč eu v višini več kot 0,5 milijona eur, je bilo ponovno vlaženje degradiranega barja, s čimer bi se ponovno začelo razvijati značilno barjansko rastlinstvo in živalstvo. običajno sta glavni grožnji izsuševanje in evtrofikacija zaradi gnojila, ki ga raznaša veter ali onesnažena voda, ki prihaja s sosednjih, močno izkoriščenih kmetijskih zemljišč. spremljanje vodostaja, kot je bilo predvideno in se je med projektom izvajalo, je služilo le za merjenje, ali je ukrep s tehničnega vidika deloval in ali je uspel povečati vodostaj. pri tem projektu se je uporabil neobičajen pristop, s katerim se je celotno barje poplavilo, nadzorna skupina pa je celo večkrat podvomila v uspeh takšnega početja. upravičenec je sicer redno poročal o doseženih povečanih vodostajih, vendar se podatki o učinku teh sprememb na indikativne vrste, kot je šotni mah, niso zbirali, da bi se pridobili dokazi o tem, ali je bil cilj projekta, torej razvoj ciljnih visokih barij, dosežen.
The monitoring carried out, gives no indication of the results of the method employed. special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
Iz izvedenega spremljanja niso nikjer razvidni rezultati uporabljene metode. posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
fLoodinG of A boG for sPecies And hAbitAt conservAtion PurPoses S o u r c e : european Court of auditors. 
POPlaVIteV barja, kI je namenjena OhranItVI Vrst In habItatOV V i r : evropsko računsko sodišče.
36. moreover, the technical monitoring did not always involve an adequate level of checks on whether the projects financed had achieved their expected results (see Box 5). 
36. poleg tega pri strokovnem spremljanju ni bilo vedno ustrezne ravni pregledov glede tega, ali so financirani projekti dosegli svoje pričakovane rezultate (glej okvir 5).
23 box 5 broKen dAm not identified by Project monitorinG one of the projects audited with an eu financing of 1 million euro, included the construction of dams to humidify an area of peat land. 
23 OkVIr 5 PrI sPremljanjU PrOjekta nI bIl OdkrIt razPadel jez eden od revidiranih projektov, ki je prejel sredstva eu v višini 1 milijona eur, je zajemal izgradnjo jezov za vlaženje šotnega območja.
Three small dams of sheet piles and one big dam with a length of about 300 metres were financed in order to humidify the deteriorated peat layer. at the time of the audit visit, the big dam had been breached because of the water pressure, according to the beneficiary. The project team had tried to repair it with a wooden structure reinforcing the sheet piles, but the reinforced dam had broken once again. as stated by the project team, there were plans to try to reconstruct the dam once again with national funds the following year. 
Da bi ponovno ovlažili poslabšano šotno plast, so bili financirani trije mahni jezi iz pilotov in en velik, približno 300 metrov dolg jez. velik jez je v času revizijskega obiska po navedbah upravičenca zaradi vodnega pritiska puščal. projektna skupina ga je poskušala popraviti z leseno strukturo, ki bi okrepila pilote, vendar je okrepljeni jez ponovno razpadel. kot je pojasnila projektna skupina, naj bi jez po načrtih naslednje leto poskušali ponovno zgraditi z nacionalnimi sredstvi. razpadel jez kaže, da cilj zadevnega ukrepa ni bil dosežen. nadzornik je po izgradnji jeza preveril njegov obstoj, vendar se pri poznejših obiskih ni poročalo o njegovem razpadu ali o njegovem negativnem učinku na obnovitev habitata.
outcome indicAtors to be deveLoPed 37. 
kazalnIkI IzIda, kI jIh je treba razVItI 37.
The prerequisite for effective monitoring is the definition of a set of clear indicators and assessment criteria. The grant agreement should describe the key actions and results to be assessed in respect of each related individual project objective. however, for 9 out of the 35 audited projects, these indicators and criteria were either not defined or were not always assessed during the monitoring. 
Za uspešno spremljanje je treba opredeliti sklop jasnih kazalnikov in meril za ocenjevanje. v sporazumu o donaciji bi morali biti opisani ključni ukrepi in rezultati, ki jih je treba oceniti za vsak z njimi povezan posamezni cilj projekta. vendar ti kazalniki in merila pri 9 od 35 revidiranih projektov bodisi niso bili opredeljeni bodisi med spremljanjem niso bili vedno ocenjeni.
38. as indicated hereafter (paragraphs 39 and 40) the audit showed that expertise for defining useful indicators for the assessment of project impact is available in the european environment agency and in the european Topic Centre on biological diversity but is not being used by the Commission for that specific purpose. 
38. kot je navedeno v nadaljevanju besedila (odstavka 39 in 40), je revizija pokazala, da imata evropska agencija za okolje in evropski tematski center za biotsko raznovrstnost na voljo strokovno znanje, vendar ga komisija ne uporablja posebej za ta namen.
The european Topic Centre assists the european environment agency by providing scientific and technical support for the establishment of the natura 2000 network. 
39. evropski tematski center pomaga evropski agenciji za okolje tako, da ji zagotavlja znanstveno in tehnično podporo pri vzpostavljanju omrežja natura 2000.
This includes the development of guidance to support reporting on the conservation status of species and habitats under article 17 of the habitat's directive, the management of reference databases (eunis and natura 2000 database) and contributions to the eea’s reports and working papers. The eTC is now developing indicators to contribute to the evaluation of the situation of biodiversity in europe, carried out within the scope of the action plan entitled streamlining european 2010 biodiversity indicators (sebi 2010). 24 special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
To zajema pripravo navodil v podporo poročanju o stanju ohranjenosti vrst in habitatov v skladu s členom 17 direktive o habitatih, upravljanje referenčnih podatkovnih zbirk (eunIs in podatkovna zbirka natura 2000) ter prispevke k poročilom in delovnim dokumentom evropske agencije za okolje. evropski tematski center zdaj razvija kazalnike, s katerimi bo prispeval k ocenjevanju stanja biotske raznovrstnosti v evropi, ki se izvaja v okviru akcijskega načrta racionalizacije evropskih kazalnikov biotske raznovrstnosti 2010 (seBI 2010). 24 posebno poročilo št.
The life iii regulation17 states that '[...] the Commission shall ensure that the results of all funded projects are disseminated to the general public and shall further demonstrate how the skills and experience gained may be reproduced elsewhere.' 
dejaVnOstI razšIrjanja je treba IzbOljšatI 42. uredba o LIFe III17 določa „[...] komisija zagotovi, da so rezultati vseh financiranih projektov na voljo širši javnosti, in nadalje na primerih pojasni, kako se lahko pridobljene sposobnosti in izkušnje uporabijo drugje.“ uredba o LIFe+18 je dodala nov sestavni del, ki se izrecno nanaša na informacije in obveščanje (glej odstavek 2).
43. The Commission has undertaken a number of activities to make life known and to disseminate information on the projects financed. The communication activities and tools include: - a website containing a significant amount of information, including news, funding, publications, toolkits for beneficiaries for the project management and communication activities, life project database, and life by country and by theme; - a life project database, which is currently the most visited section of the website, including a summary of each life project with a section intended for publishing a link to the project website, a layman's report, a video and additional documentation on the project; - printed publications, such as 'life focus' with two annual issues, an annual compilation of new projects selected and a natura 2000 newsletter issued twice a year in english, french, german, italian and spanish; - an electronic news alert distributed monthly to an extensive mailing list; - organisation of and participation in meetings and public events to present life in various member states; and, - media actions, such as the annual presentation of new projects. 
43. komisija je izvedla številne dejavnosti, s katerimi je želela javnost obvestiti o projektu LIFe in razširjati informacije o financiranih projektih. med dejavnosti in orodja obveščanja sodijo: - spletna stran z veliko informacijami, vključno z novicami, financiranjem, publikacijami, zbirkami orodij v pomoč upravičencem pri upravljanju projektov in dejavnostih obveščanja, podatkovno zbirko projekta LIFe ter LIFe po državah in področjih; - podatkovna zbirka projekta LIFe, ki je trenutno najbolj obiskan del spletne strani ter vsebuje povzetek vsakega projekta LIFe z rubriko, namenjeno objavi povezave do spletne strani projekta, poročilo za širšo javnost (Layman's Report), video posnetek in dodatno gradivo o projektu; - tiskane publikacije, kot so „LIFe Focus“ z dvema izdajama na leto, letna zbirka novih izbranih projektov in novice natura 2000, ki dvakrat letno izidejo v angleškem, francoskem, nem-škem, italijanskem in španskem jeziku; - elektronske novice, ki se vsak mesec pošljejo obsežnemu seznamu prejemnikov; - organizacija sestankov in javnih prireditev za predstavitev LIFe v različnih državah članicah ter udeležba na teh sestankih in prireditvah; - medijske dejavnosti, kot je letna predstavitev novih projektov.
17 article 9 of regulation (eC) no 1655/2000, as amended by regulation (eC) no 1682/2004. 
17 Člen 9 uredbe (es) št. 1655/2000, kakor je bila spremenjena z uredbo (es) št.
18 article 4 of regulation (eC) no 614/2007. 
18 Člen 4 uredbe (es) št. 614/2007.
44. moreover, the project beneficiaries are required to publish a dedicated website or a subsite, submit audiovisual material to the Commission, acknowledge eu support in their communications, erect and maintain notice boards and submit a layman’s report at the project closure. 
44. poleg tega morajo upravičenci pri projektih izdelati namensko spletno stran ali podstran, komisiji predložiti avdiovizualno gradivo, v svojih sporočilih navesti podporo eu, postaviti in vzdrževati oglasne deske in ob zaključku projekta predložiti poročilo za širšo javnost.
45. Currently, the Commission’s communication activities focus principally on making the life instrument known in general and on promoting a number of selected examples of life projects, both at the level of the life website and in its printed publications. 
45. komisija se zdaj pri svojih dejavnostih obveščanja osredotoča predvsem na izboljševanje splošne prepoznavnosti instrumenta LIFe in spodbujanje številnih izbranih primerov projektov LIFe tako na ravni spletne strani LIFe kot v svojih tiskanih publikacijah. upravičenci projektov morajo svoje izložke projektov objaviti na spletni strani projekta ali v poročilu za širšo javnost.
There is no requirement to disseminate lessons learnt or detailed technical information and, in practice, this knowledge is rarely made available. difficulties or failures with techniques and demonstrative approaches used may thus be repeated across europe without knowledge of the lessons already learnt in comparable circumstances. funds and time would be wasted if accumulated knowledge and experience on practices is not systematically collected and accessible for both failures and best practices. 
Za razširjanje pridobljenih izkušenj ali podrobnih tehničnih informacij ni nobene zahteve, v praksi pa se to znanje le redko da na voljo. Tako se lahko brez znanja o že pridobljenih izkušnjah v primerljivih okoliščinah v evropi ponovijo težave ali neuspehi glede uporabljenih metod in predstavitvenih pristopov. Finančna sredstva in čas bodo zapravljeni, če se pridobljeno znanje in izkušnje tako o neuspehih kot o najboljših praksah ne zbirajo in dajo na voljo sistematično.
46. in addition, the current communication tools – such as the life website and database, life focus, project websites – do not generally provide the level of technical/scientific detail that would be necessary to make the acquired knowledge and experience on methods and techniques used systematically available to potential users. The dissemination material relating to the projects examined is mostly of a general nature and not targeted at experts. a survey performed by external evaluators19 revealed a lack of detail to be a general issue and was considered a particular problem with the life database by 66 % of its users. 
46. poleg tega sedanja orodja za obveščanje, kot so spletna stran in podatkovna zbirka LIFe, „LIFE Focus“ ter spletne strani projektov, na splošno ne zagotavljajo dovolj podrobnih tehničnih/znanstve-nih informacij, potrebnih, da bi se pridobljeno znanje in izkušnje glede uporabljenih metod in tehnik sistematično dale na voljo morebitnim uporabnikom. objavljeno gradivo v zvezi s preučenimi projekti je večinoma splošne narave in ni namenjeno strokovnjakom. raziskava, ki so jo izvedli zunanji ocenjevalci19, je pokazala, da pomanjkanje podrobnosti na splošno predstavlja težavo, 66 % uporabnikov podatkovne zbirke LIFe pa meni, da je poseben problem te zbirke to, da je premalo podrobna.
This was confirmed during the on-the-spot visits (see Box 6). 
To je bilo potrjeno tudi med obiski na kraju samem (glej okvir 6).
19 The Commission contracted an external evaluation of the relevance and impact of the life communication activities for the period 2000-2007, which was finalised in august 2008. The projects surveyed for the evaluation were selected predominantly from among good practice projects in terms of content or communication practices. 27 special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
19 komisija je naročila zunanjo oceno ustreznosti in učinka dejavnosti obveščanja pri LIFe za obdobje 2000–2007, ki je bila končana avgusta 2008. projekti, ki so bili preučeni za namen ocene, so bili izbrani predvsem med projekti, pri katerih je bila uporabljena dobra praksa glede vsebine ali načinov obveščanja. 27 posebno poročilo št.
47. furthermore, a number of life-nature projects finance the compilation of best practice management guidance manuals or other technical/scientific publications in the national language, based on extensive research work. however, these manuals are not systematically made available on the project website or the life database or translated. as such, the added value and expert knowledge gained is not systematically exploited to achieve a multiplier effect. 
11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija 47. poleg tega številni projekti LIFe-narava financirajo priročnike s smernicami o najboljših praksah pri upravljanju ali druge stro-kovne/znanstvene publikacije v nacionalnem jeziku, pripravljene na podlagi obsežnega raziskovalnega dela. vendar ti priročniki niso sistematično dostopni na spletni strani projekta ali v podatkovni zbirki LIFe in niso prevedeni. pridobljena dodana vrednost in strokovno znanje se tako ne izkoriščata sistematično, da bi se dosegel pomnoževalni učinek.
48. project beneficiaries and their experts network with others with varying degrees of success. according to the Commission’s mid-term evaluation of the implementation of life in 2003, most stakeholders surveyed considered the lack of eu level networking as being among the key barriers for transnational debates on life issues20. despite the existing networks of scientists and specialised organisations, project beneficiaries and their experts underlined the importance of eu level networking and the need to overcome any barriers. 
48. upravičenci in strokovnjaki pri projektih so različno uspešni pri povezovanju z drugimi upravičenci in strokovnjaki. Glede na komisijino vmesno oceno o izvajanju LIFe v letu 2003 je večina anketiranih zainteresiranih strani menila, da pomanjkanje povezovanja na ravni eu sodi med glavne ovire mednacionalnih razprav o vprašanjih v zvezi z LIFe20.
20 mid-term evaluation of the implementation of the life financial instrument (july 2003), pages 12 and 14. 
20 vmesna ocena o izvajanju finančnega instrumenta LIFe (julij 2003), strani 12 in 14.
To avoid the production of updated information panels, the project beneficiaries purchased a site information panel where they noted down up-to-date information about project progress. 
Da jim ni bilo treba vedno znova izdelovati novih oglasnih panojev, so upravičenci projekta kupili fiksen oglasni pano, na katerem so posodabljali informacije o napredku pri projektu.
The information on the panel could be deleted and updated to provide details on project progress. The same project used material from other project works to create a natural viewing point, thereby saving money which would otherwise have been used to transport and deposit the material elsewhere and to build instead an expensive observation tower. another project developed a very cost-efficient method to regulate water levels by using simple elbow pipes instead of the costly traditional barrages. such techniques were communicated to other national projects, but were not described on the website nor spread to a wider public. special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
Informacije na panoju je bilo mogoče izbrisati in posodobiti s podrobnostmi o napredku pri projektu. pri istem projektu je bil uporabljen material iz drugih delov projekta za izgradnjo naravne razgledne točke, s čimer se je prihranil denar, ki bi bil sicer porabljen za prevoz in odlaganje materiala drugam ter za izgradnjo dragega opazovalnega stolpa. pri drugem projektu je bila razvita stroškovno zelo učinkovita metoda za uravnavanje vodostajev s preprostimi ukrivljenimi cevmi namesto z dragimi tradicionalnimi zajezi-tvami.
KnoWLedGe trAnsfer reQuires revised communi-cAtion stAndArds 49. The communication standards21 established by the Commission for the dissemination of project results can be improved to ensure that the project output and results are adequately accessible to achieve a wider knowledge transfer. in practice it is left to the discretion of each project beneficiary to deal with the dissemination activities as they consider appropriate. as a consequence, the emphasis on communication in terms of volume, target groups, professionalism and project management attention differs significantly between projects often only reaching the regional and national levels. 
11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija za PrenOs znanja je treba sPremenItI standarde ObVeščanja 49. standarde obveščanja21, ki jih je komisija določila za razširjanje rezultatov projektov, je mogoče izboljšati, da se zagotovi ustrezna dostopnost izložkov in rezultatov projektov, s čimer bi se omogočil širši prenos znanja. v praksi se lahko vsak upravičenec projekta po lastni presoji in kot meni, da je ustrezno, odloči o svojih dejavnostih razširjanja.