natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The lack of provision for Commission review of FEAPs and the insufficient rules on their content increase the risk that actions to balance fishing capacity with fishing opportunities are not adequate. 
Ker ni določeno, da mora Komisija pregledati FEAP, in ker ni zadostnih pravil o njihovi vsebini, obstaja večje tveganje, da dejavnosti za doseganje ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi niso ustrezne.
Box 2 presents weaknesses in the implementation of FEAPs in France, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom. 
V okviru 2 so predstavljene slabosti pri izvajanju FEAP v Franciji, na Poljskem, v Španiji in Združenem kraljestvu.
WEAK PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES 41. 
ŠIBKI KAZALNIKI SMOTRNOSTI POSLOVANJA V OPERATIVNIH PROGRAMIH 41.
Suitable performance indicators are a basic requirement of any public policy, to focus actions on objectives and to enable an assessment of whether objectives are being met. 
Primerni kazalniki smotrnosti poslovanja so temeljna zahteva vsake javne politike, da se dejavnosti usmerijo na cilje in da je mogoče oceniti, ali se ti dosegajo.
The EFF regulations34 provide that Member States’ operational programmes (OPs) should have indicators making it possible to measure progress, including specific targets at priority axis level. 
Uredbe o ESR34 določajo, da morajo imeti operativni programi držav članic kazalnike, ki omogočajo merjenje napredka, vključno s specifičnimi cilji na ravni prednostne osi.
Box 3 presents the capacity reduction targets of the Member States audited by the Court. 34 Article 20(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006; Annex I, Part A, point 4 to Commission Regulation (EC) No 498/2007 (OJ L 120, 10.5.2007, p. 
V okviru 3 so predstavljeni cilji držav članic, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, za zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti. 34 Člen 20.1, pododstavek c), Uredbe (ES) št. 1198/2006; Priloga 1, del A.4, Uredbe Komisije (ES) št.
24 BOX 2 INSUFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION OF FISHING EFFORT ADJUSTMENT PLANS (a) In France, the FEAP was not a published document. 
24 OKVIR 2 NEZADOSTNO IZVAJANJE NAČRTOV ZA PRILAGAJANJE RIBOLOVNEGA NAPORA (a) V Franciji FEAP ni bil objavljen.
Owners of fishing vessels representing 84 % of the fishing capacity of the French metropolitan fishing fleet of 2007 were eligible to apply for public aid for decommissioning. 
Lastniki ribiških plovil, ki so predstavljala 84 % ribolovne zmogljivosti ribolovne flote metropolitanske Francije v letu 2007, so bili upravičeni, da zaprosijo za javno pomoč za umik plovil iz obratovanja.
No evaluation of the amount of the overcapacity by targeted fishing fleet segment was provided to justify the increase from the OP to the FEAP (see Box 3 point (b)). (b) In Poland, the increase in the fishing capacity reduction target for the cod fishing fleet from 3 095 GT in the OP to 6 000 GT in the FEAP was not sufficiently explained. 
Za utemeljitev povečanja v FEAP glede na OP ni bila navedena nobena ocena presežne zmogljivosti ciljnega segmenta ribolovne flote (glej okvir 3 (b)). (b) Na Poljskem povečanje cilja za zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti flote za ribolov trske s 3 095 BT v operativnem programu na 6 000 BT v FEAP ni bilo dovolj pojasnjeno.
The subsequent fishing vessel decommissioning scheme was open to fishing vessels from the Baltic Sea fleet which can catch any kind of fish. 
Poznejša shema za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja je bila na voljo tudi ribiškim plovilom iz flote Baltskega morja, ki lahko lovi vse vrste rib.
The annual report on the Polish fishing fleet for 2009 did not assess cod fishing capacity removed (as opposed to total capacity removed). (c) Spain did not publish formal FEAPs. 
V letnem poročilu o poljski ribolovni floti za leto 2009 ni bila ocenjena umaknjena ribolovna zmogljivost za trsko (v nasprotju s celotno umaknjeno zmogljivostjo). (c) Španija ni objavila uradnih FEAP.
Instead it considered national fishing vessel decommissioning schemes as sufficient justification. 
Menila je namreč, da je nacionalna shema za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja zadostna utemeljitev.
However, there was not a formal justification for the fishing vessel decommissioning schemes in terms of linking fishing capacities with available fishing resources, or in identifying required levels of fishing effort. (d) In the United Kingdom, the FEAP for England targeted vessels under 10 metres. 
Vendar ni bilo uradne utemeljitve za sheme za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja, ki bi povezovala ribolovne zmogljivosti z razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi viri ali opredelila potrebne ravni ribolovnega napora. (d) V Združenem kraljestvu je bil FEAP za Anglijo usmerjen na plovila, krajša od 10 m.
The FEAP did not assess the imbalance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities but cannot have a significant impact on this imbalance, as the under 10-metre fleet represents less than 1 % of the quotas for the targeted fish stocks allocated to the English fleet. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
V FEAP ni bilo ocenjeno neravnovesje med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi, vendar FEAP na to neravnovesje ni mogel bistveno vplivati, saj plovila, krajša od 10 m, predstavljajo manj kot 1 % kvot za ciljne ribje staleže, dodeljenih angleški floti. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
25 BOX 3 Planned capacity reduction Target capacity after EFF Note Member State Base capacity % reduction GT reduction Denmark 87 342 15 % 13 101 74 241 (a) Spain 480 761 16 % 78 670 402 091 France 194 000 21 % 40 648 153 352 (b) Italy 184 493 10 % 17 920 166 573 Poland 42 510 14 % 6 000 36 510 (c) Portugal 106 890 9% 10 030 96 860 United Kingdom 212 844 10 % to 15 % 21 284 – 31 926 191 560 – 180 918 (d) FISHING FLEET CAPACITY (GT) REDUCTION TARGETS IN OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES (OP) 2007–13 (a) A 15 % reduction in the number of vessels was expected to be attained by fleet restructuring facilitated by licence transfer schemes, without public aid. (b) An initial reduction target of 8 %, or 15 520 GT was increased by the FEAP to 40 648 GT. 
25 OKVIR 3 Načrtovana zmanjšanja zmogljivosti Ciljna zmogljivost po ESR Opomba Država članica Osnovna zmogljivost % znižanja Znižanje BT Danska 87 342 15 % 13 101 74 241 (a) Španija 480 761 16 % 78 670 402 091 Francija 194 000 21 % 40 648 153 352 (b) Italija 184 493 10 % 17 920 166 573 Poljska 42 510 14 % 6 000 36 510 (c) Portugalska 106 890 9% 10 030 96 860 Združeno kraljestvo 212 844 10 % –15 % 21 284 – 31 926 191 560 – 180 918 (d) CILJI ZA ZMANJŠANJE RIBOLOVNE ZMOGLJIVOSTI (BT) V OPERATIVNIH PROGRAMIH ZA OBDOBJE 2007–2013 (a) Po pričakovanjih bi moralo biti doseženo 15-odstotno zmanjšanje števila plovil s prestrukturiranjem flote brez javne pomoči, ki so ga olajšale sheme za prenos dovoljenj. (b) Prvotno ciljno zmanjšanje v višini 8 % oziroma 15 520 BT je bilo v FEAP povečano na 40 648 BT.
Total public funding for decommissioning was increased from 66 million euro to 150 million euro and the rate of EFF co-financing was reduced from 40 % to 20 %. (c) The reduction is targeted on the cod fishing fleet, which had a capacity of 10 316 GT. 
Skupno javno financiranje za umik iz obratovanja je bilo povečano s 66 milijonov EUR na 150 milijonov EUR, stopnja sofinanciranja iz ESR pa je bila zmanjšana s 40 % na 20 %. (c) Zmanjšanje je usmerjeno na floto za ribolov trske, ki je imela zmogljivost 10 316 BT.
An initial reduction target of 30 %, or 3 095 GT, was increased by the FEAP to 6 000 GT. (d) A reduction in capacity was foreseen, but no target was set. 
Prvotno ciljno zmanjšanje v višini 30 % oziroma 3 095 BT je bilo v FEAP povečano na 6 000 BT. (d) Predvideno je bilo zmanjšanje zmogljivosti, vendar ni bil določen noben cilj.
Source: Member States’ operational programmes and fishing effort adjustment plans. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Vir: Operativni programi držav članic in njihovi načrti za prilagajanje ribolovnega napora. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
Box 4 presents weaknesses in the establishment of capacity reduction targets in Spain, Poland, Portugal and the United Kingdom. 
V okviru 4 so predstavljene slabosti pri določanju ciljev za zmanjšanje zmogljivosti v Španiji, na Poljskem, Portugalskem in v Združenem kraljestvu.
The EFF regulation35 provides that subsidies to investments on board fishing vessels may concern improvements of safety on board, working conditions, hygiene, product quality, energy efficiency and selectivity, provided that they do not increase the ability of the vessels to catch fish. 
Uredba o ESR35 določa, da se lahko subvencije za naložbe v ribiška plovila nanašajo na izboljšanje varnosti na krovu, delovnih pogojev, higiene in kakovosti proizvodov, energetske učinkovitosti in selektivnosti, če to ne prispeva k večji ribolovni zmogljivosti plovila.
No public aid shall be granted for the construction of fishing vessels nor for the increase of fish holds. 
Javne pomoči se ne dodeli za gradnjo ribiških plovil ali povečanje prostorov za skladiščenje rib.
There is a potential contradiction in providing funding for investments on board fishing vessels and at the same time requiring these investments not to increase the ability to catch fish. 
Zagotavljanje financiranja za naložbe v ribiška plovila in hkra-tna zahteva, da te naložbe ne povečajo dejanske ribolovne zmožnosti sta lahko v protislovju.
Moreover the prohibition of subsidies to investments which increase fishing ability is not clearly defined and varies depending on the language version of the EFF regulation. 
Poleg tega prepoved subvencij za naložbe, ki povečujejo dejansko ribolovno zmožnost ni jasno opredeljena in se razlikuje glede na jezikovno različico uredbe o ESR.
The Commission has not issued sufficient guidance on the interpretation of this regulatory requirement. 
Komisija ni izdala dovolj navodil za razlaganje te zahteve iz uredbe.
35 Article25(2)ofRegulation (EC) No 1198/2006. 
35 Člen25.2Uredbe(ES) št. 1198/2006.
26 BOX 4 INSUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION FOR TARGETS OF REDUCING FISHING CAPACITY (a) See Box 2 point (b) for Poland. (b) In Portugal, the OP did not provide sufficient justification for the target in terms of balancing fishing capacity with available fishing opportunities. (c) In Spain, the OP’s target of removing 78 670 GT did not systematically take into account the specific situation of different fish stocks. 
26 OKVIR 4 NEZADOSTNA UTEMELJITEV PRI CILJIH ZA ZMANJŠANJE RIBOLOVNE ZMOGLJIVOSTI (a) Glej točko (b) v okviru 2 za Poljsko. (b) Na Portugalskem v operativnem programu za cilj ni bilo dovolj utemeljeno, kako bo doseženo ravnovesje med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi možnostmi. (c) V Španiji pri cilju v operativnem programu, da se umakne 78 670 BT, niso bile sistematično upoštevane specifične razmere različnih ribjih staležev.
It therefore does not allow an evaluation of whether fishing fleet decommissioning schemes have contributed to reducing overcapacity by fishing fleet segment. (d) In the United Kingdom, the OP envisaged a reduction in capacity, but no target was set. 
Zato ni mogoče oceniti, ali so sheme za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja prispevale k zmanjšanju presežne zmogljivosti po segmentih ribolovne flote. (d) V Združenem kraljestvu je bilo v operativnem programu predvideno zmanjšanje zmogljivosti, vendar ni bil določen noben cilj.
This makes it difficult to assess performance. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Zato je težko oceniti smotrnost poslovanja. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
In practice some eligible investments on board a vessel could increase its ability to catch fish. 
V praksi lahko nekatere upravičene naložbe v ribiška plovila povečajo njihove dejanske ribolovne zmožnosti.
For example, investments in energy-efficient engines and improvements in working and safety conditions can make it faster for fishing vessels to get to fishing grounds and can make fishers more productive. 
Na primer, naložbe v energetsko učinkovite motorje ter izboljšanje delovnih in varnostnih pogojev lahko ribiškim plovilom omogo-čijo, da hitreje priplujejo do ribolovnega območja in povečajo produktivnost ribičev.
The effect of such EFF-funded investments on any increase in the ability to catch fish is difficult to quantify, due to other relevant factors such as changes in fishing authorisations, changes in weather conditions and other non-funded investments on board. 
Učinek takšnih naložb, financiranih iz ESR, na kakršno koli povečanje dejanske ribolovne zmožnosti je težko količinsko ovrednotiti zaradi drugih pomembnih dejavnikov, kot so spremembe ribolovnih pooblastil, spremembe vremenskih pogojev in druge naložbe v ribiška plovila, ki so brez javnega financiranja.
All of the Member States audited checked that on-board investment projects funded by the EFF did not increase fishing capacity in terms of GT and kW. 
Vse revidirane države članice so preverile, da projekti naložb v ribiška plovila, ki jih je financiral ESR, niso povečali ribolovne zmogljivosti v BT in kW.
However, as the example in Box 5 illustrates, the Member States did not adequately check whether these investments increase the ability of the vessels to catch fish. 
Vendar države članice, kot kaže primer v okviru 5, niso ustrezno preverile, ali te naložbe povečujejo dejansko ribolovno zmožnost plovil.
In Portugal and Denmark, applicants for EFF aid for on-board investment projects often indicated that catches would increase, although for the projects examined by the Court in Denmark there was no evidence of such an increase. 
Na Portugalskem in Danskem so vlagatelji zahtevkov za pomoč iz ESR za projekte naložb v ribiška plovila pogosto navedli, da se bo ulov povečal, čeprav pri projektih, ki jih je Sodišče preučilo na Danskem, ni bilo nobenih dokazov o takšnem povečanju.
27 BOX 5 INVESTMENTS ON BOARD INCREASING THE ABILITY TO CATCH FISH One of the modernisation projects audited in the United Kingdom concerned a project to replace the normal propeller by a nozzle propulsion system, resulting in an increase of the vessel’s speed. 
27 OKVIR 5 NALOŽBE V RIBIŠKA PLOVILA, KI POVEČUJEJO DEJANSKO RIBOLOVNO ZMOŽNOST Eden od projektov posodobitve, revidiranih v Združenem kraljestvu, se je nanašal na projekt zamenjave običajnega propelerja s pogonskim sistemom s šobo, kar je privedlo do povečanja hitrosti plovila.
The skipper informed the auditors that the speed increase had resulted in higher fish catches. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Kapitan je revizorjem povedal, da je povečanje hitrosti privedlo do večjega ulova rib. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
The fishing fleet register is a basic reference for the application of the rules of the CFP, including compliance by Member States with fishing fleet capacity reference levels and ceilings. 
Register ribolovne flote je osnovna referenca za uporabo pravil SRP, vključno z upoštevanjem referenčnih ravni in zgornjih meja zmogljivosti ribolovne flote s strani držav članic.
Under-reporting of fishing vessels decommissioned with public aid has the effect of inflating these reference levels and ceilings (notwithstanding the fact that these ceilings are already so high that their effect is limited — see paragraph 23). 
Premajhno poročanje o plovilih, umaknjenih iz obratovanja z javno pomočjo, povzroča napihovanje teh referenčnih ravni in zgornjih meja (ne glede na dejstvo, da so te zgornje meje že tako visoke, da je njihov učinek omejen – glej odstavek 23).
The Court found errors in the fishing fleet register data recorded by France and the United Kingdom concerning vessels decommissioning with EFF aid. 
Sodišče je v registru ribolovne flote odkrilo napake v podatkih, ki sta jih vnesla Francija in Združeno kraljestvo, v zvezi s plovili, ki so bila umaknjena iz obratovanja s pomočjo iz ESR.
By the time of the audit in 2010, 65 fishing vessels had been decommissioned in the United Kingdom with aid from the EFF. 
Do časa revizije leta 2010 je bilo v Združenem kraljestvu s pomočjo iz ESR iz obratovanja umaknjenih 65 ribiških plovil.
However, three of these 65 vessels still appear as active (i.e. not decommissioned) on the fishing fleet register. 
Vendar so tri od teh 65 plovil v registru ribolovne flote še vedno zavedena kot aktivna (tj. kot da niso bila umaknjena iz obratovanja).
The 62 vessels recorded as having exited the fishing fleet were incorrectly shown as not having benefited from public aid (the corresponding tonnage amounted to 452 GT). 
Za 62 plovil, za katera je bilo zavedeno, da so izstopila iz ribolovne flote, je bilo napačno navedeno, da niso prejela javne pomoči (pripadajoča tonaža je znašala 452 BT).
By the same time, 155 fishing vessels had been decommissioned in France with aid from the EFF. 
Do takrat je bilo v Franciji s pomočjo iz ESR iz obratovanja umaknjenih 155 ribiških plovil.
While these vessels were all recorded as decommissioned in the fleet register, 87 were incorrectly shown as not having benefited from public aid (the corresponding tonnage amounted to 5 357 GT). 
Čeprav je bilo v registru ribolovne flote za vsa ta plovila zavedeno, da so bila umaknjena iz obratovanja, je bilo za 87 plovil napačno navedeno, da niso prejela javne pomoči (pripadajoča tonaža je znašala 5 357 BT).
Publicly funded fishing vessel decommissioning schemes need to be well targeted by Member States, using FEAPs, at fisheries where there is evidence of fishing overcapacity. 
Države članice morajo javno financirane sheme za umik plovil iz obratovanja z uporabo FEAP dobro ciljno usmeriti v tiste vrste ribolova, kjer obstajajo dokazi o presežni ribolovni zmogljivosti.
There should be appropriate criteria for selecting the specific fishing vessels for decommissioning, to ensure that they are actively engaged in the fishing activities which are subject to the FEAP and fishing vessel decommissioning scheme. 
Obstajati bi morala ustrezna merila za izbiranje specifičnih ribiških plovil za umik iz obratovanja, da se zagotovi, da dejavno izvajajo ribolovne dejavnosti, za katere veljata FEAP in shema za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja.
The eligibility criteria used by France and Poland were not well targeted. 
Merila za upravičenost, ki sta jih uporabljali Francija in Poljska, niso bila dobro ciljno usmerjena.
In France, the main eligibility criterion for most of the fishing vessel decommissioning schemes was the possession of a special fishing permit for the targeted fishery (fishing vessels may possess permits for different fisheries). 
V Franciji je bilo pri večini shem za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja glavno merilo posedovanje posebnega dovoljenja za gospodarski ribolov za ciljno vrsto ribolova (ribiška plovila lahko imajo dovoljenja za različne vrste ribolova).
Data on catches of the species targeted by the fishing vessel decommissioning schemes were not required and fishing vessels that landed very few fish from the targeted species could therefore be decommissioned with public aid. 
Podatki o ulovu vrst, v katere so bile usmerjene sheme za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja, se niso zahtevali, zato je bilo mogoče z javno pomočjo umakniti iz obratovanja tudi ribiška plovila, ki niso iztovorila velike količine ciljne vrste rib.
Two of the 10 projects audited concern the general cod fishing decommissioning scheme. 
Dva od 10 revidiranih projektov se nanašata na splošno shemo za umik iz obratovanja za ribolov trske.
One of these projects only landed insignificant quantities of cod before it was decommissioned: DECOMMISSIONED VESSEL IN FRANCE WHICH LANDED LITTLE OF THE TARGETED FISH STOCK 53. 
En od teh projektov je pred umikom iz obratovanja iztovoril le nepomembno količino trske. PLOVILO, UMAKNJENO IZ OBRATOVANJA V FRANCIJI, KI JE IZTOVORILO MAJHNO KOLIČINO CILJNEGA RIBJEGA STALEŽA 53.
The main eligibility criterion of the Celtic Sea cod fishing decommissioning scheme was that cod, whiting, monkfish and megrim36 should represent at least 25 % of the value of the catches of the vessel in 2006 and 2007. 
Glavno merilo za upravičenost pri shemi za umik iz obratovanja za ribolov trske v Keltskem morju je bilo, da morajo trska, sinji mol, morska spaka in krilati romb36 predstavljati vsaj 25 % vrednosti ulova plovila v letih 2006 in 2007.
As a result, fishing vessels were eligible for decommissioning even if they landed very little cod. 
Zato so bila ribiška plovila upravičena do umika iz obratovanja kljub temu, da so iztovorila zelo malo trske.
Three of the 10 projects audited concerned this scheme and landed insignificant quantities of cod: DECOMMISSIONED FISHING VESSELS IN FRANCE WHICH LANDED LITTLE OF THE TARGETED FISH STOCK 36 These other species were included because Celtic Sea cod is a mixed fishery and other species may be captured in the trawls at the same time as the cod. 
Trije od desetih revidiranih projektov so se nanašali na to shemo in iztovorili nepomembne količine trske. PLOVILA, UMAKNJENA IZ OBRATOVANJA V FRANCIJI, KI SO IZTOVORILA MAJHNE KOLIČINE CILJNEGA RIBJEGA STALEŽA 36 Te druge vrste rib so bile vključene, ker je ribolov trske v Keltskem morju mešan ribolov in se lahko skupaj s trsko v vlečne mreže ujamejo tudi druge vrste rib.
29 Total fish landed 2007–08 (kg) Cod (kg) % Vessel 1 562 944 7 935 1,4 % Total fish landed 2006–08 (kg) Cod (kg) % Vessel 1 446 894 512 0,1 % Vessel 2 173 513 437 0,3 % Vessel 3 406 201 1 536 0,4 % Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
29 Skupni iztovor rib 2007–2008 (v kg) Trska (v kg) % Plovilo 1 562 944 7 935 1,4 % Skupni iztovor rib 2006–2008 (v kg) Trska (v kg) % Plovilo 1 446 894 512 0,1 % Plovilo 2 173 513 437 0,3 % Plovilo 3 406 201 1 536 0,4 % Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
The only Polish fishing vessel decommissioning scheme aims to adapt the cod fishing fleet to available resources. 
Samo poljska shema za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja si prizadeva za prilagoditev flote za ribolov trske razpoložljivim virom.
Most Polish fishing vessels in the Baltic are capable of catching cod, although many target pelagic fish stocks instead. 
Večina poljskih ribiških plovil v Baltskem morju lahko lovi trsko, čeprav mnoge namesto tega lovijo pelagične ribje staleže.
The fishing vessel decommissioning scheme does not have any eligibility criteria relating to fishing gear or fish catches, which means that practically all fishing vessels of the Polish fishing fleet are eligible for vessel decommissioning with public aid, even vessels which have little impact on cod fishing. granting public aid for decommissioning inactive fishing vessels 55. 
Shema za umik plovil iz obratovanja nima nobenih meril za upravičenost v zvezi z ribolovno opremo ali ulovi rib, kar pomeni, da so praktično vsa ribiška plovila poljske ribolovne flote upravičena do umika iz obratovanja z javno pomočjo, celo plovila, ki le malo vplivajo na ribolov trske. dodeljevanje javne pomoči za umik neaktivnih ribiških plovil iz obratovanja 55.
A significant risk in providing public funds for scrapping fishing vessels is that subsidies are paid for fishing vessels which would cease activity anyway (‘deadweight’). 
Precejšnje tveganje pri zagotavljanju javnih sredstev za dajanje ribiških plovil v razrez je, da se subvencije izplačajo za ribiška plovila, ki bi v vsakem primeru prenehala z dejavnostjo (učinek „mrtvih izgub“).