natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Luxembourg, the Commission is using collaborative working spaces for approximately 200 staff in two buildings 23. 26 The Parliament commissioned feasibility studies with a view to creating collaborative spaces in two new building projects 24. Although the project in its original form was later abandoned, the Parliament is implementing some of its elements in these two buildings based on a dialogue with the services concerned. 
Komisija v Luxembourgu uporablja skupne delovne prostore za približno 200 zaposlenih v dveh zgradbah.23 26 Parlament je naročil študije izvedljivosti, da bi v dveh projektih novogradenj ustvaril skupne prostore.24 Čeprav je bil projekt v prvotni obliki nato opuščen, Parlament v teh dveh zgradbah na podlagi dialoga z zadevnimi službami izvaja nekatere njegove elemente.
20 NWoW requires that specific tools be developed in three main areas: Human resources /culture of organisation (including activity-based approach, teleworking policy and staff evaluation), Information and communication technology (paperless, reliable IT infrastructure) and Workspace (quiet rooms, collaborative spaces, office layout etc.). 
Institucije še niso v celoti ocenile 20 V skladu z novimi načini dela je treba razviti specifična orodja na treh glavnih področjih: človeški viri/kultura organizacije (vključno s pristopom na podlagi dejavnosti, politiko dela na daljavo in ocenjevanjem zaposlenih), informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije (zanesljiva infrastruktura IT brez papirja) in delovni prostor (tihi prostori, skupni prostori, razporeditev pisarn itd.).
21 Opportunity to alternate regular periods of teleworking and working in the office, where possible. 
21 Priložnost za izmenjavo rednih obdobij dela na daljavo in dela v pisarni, kadar je to mogoče.
22 MO15, MERO, CSM1. 
22 MO15, MERO in CSM1.
23 Drosbach and Euroforum. 
23 Drosbach in Euroforum.
The institutions have not yet fully assessed the economic and other benefits of implemented collaborative working spaces, such as increased productivity. 
ekonomskih in drugih koristi skupnih delovnih prostorov, ki so bili uvedeni, na primer večje produktivnosti.
Decisions regarding office accommodation are well-founded, but construction project financing mechanisms are often complex thereby affecting budgetary transparency 28 We examined how the institutions approach the host countries in order to obtain the best conditions when selecting their buildings. 
Odločitve glede pisarniških prostorov so dobro utemeljene, mehanizmi za financiranje gradbenih projektov pa so pogosto kompleksni in zato vplivajo na proračunsko preglednost 28 Sodišče je preučilo, kako institucije pristopajo k državam gostiteljicam, da bi pri izbiri svojih zgradb pridobile najboljše pogoje.
29 We analysed whether the decisions on new building projects were based on sound financial management criteria. 
29 Analiziralo je, ali so odločitve v zvezi s projekti novogradenj temeljile na merilih dobrega finančnega poslovodenja.
30 We also looked at whether the financing mechanisms selected by the institutions take account of the options available under the Financial Regulation, are transparent and promote accountability. 
30 Preučilo je tudi, ali mehanizmi financiranja, ki jih izberejo institucije, upoštevajo možnosti, ki so na voljo na podlagi finančne uredbe, ter ali so pregledni in spodbujajo odgovornost.
Host countries generally offer support and preferential conditions to the institutions 31 Most of the buildings in the institutions’ portfolios are located in Brussels and Luxembourg, while the ECB is located in Frankfurt. 
Države gostiteljice institucijam na splošno zagotavljajo podporo in preferencialne pogoje 31 Večina zgradb v portfeljih institucij je v Bruslju in Luxembourgu, ECB pa se nahaja v Frankfurtu.
In compliance with the EU treaties 25, the host countries exempt the institutions from direct taxes on revenue, property and other assets and from indirect taxes 26. 
Države gostiteljice so v skladu s Pogodbami EU25 institucije izvzete iz neposrednih davkov na prihodke, nepremičnine in druga sredstva ter iz posrednih davkov26.
Some host countries also offer the institutions other advantages, depending on the possibilities and the outcome of ne g oti a ti ons . 
Nekatere države gostiteljice institucijam ponujajo tudi druge ugodnosti, ki so odvisne od možnosti in izida pogajanj.
32 The following two cases are recent examples of preferential conditions provided by Belgian authorities. 
32 Naslednja primera sta nedavna primera preferencialnih pogojev, ki so jih zagotovili belgijski organi.
For the Europa building, the Belgian authorities offered the Council the land and the existing building for a symbolic €1 and managed the building project free of charge. 
Belgijski organi so za zgradbo Europa Svetu ponudili zemljišče in obstoječo zgradbo za simboličen 1 EUR ter brezplačno vodili projekt gradnje.
For a building plot in the ‘Rue de la Loi’, the Commission has received the right to almost double the construction capacity. 
Komisija je za stavbno zemljišče na ulici Rue de la Loi dobila pravico do skoraj dvakratne gradbene zmogljivosti.
The Commission 25 Article 3 of the Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (TFEU). 
25 Člen 3 Protokola (št.
33 In Luxembourg, the institutions also enjoy preferential conditions and state support in relation to their building projects. 
33 Tudi v Luxembourgu so institucije deležne preferencialnih pogojev in državne podpore pri gradbenih projektih.
For example, the Luxembourgish authorities offered to the Parliament and the Court of Justice the land for their building complexes for a symbolic €127 and both institutions rent some of their buildings from the state for a preferential amount. 
Luksemburški organi so na primer Parlamentu in Sodišču Evropske unije ponudili zemljišče za njune nepremičninske komplekse za simboličen 1 EUR27, obe instituciji pa sta nekatere od zgradb za preferenčni znesek najeli od države.
The level of involvement of the competent national authority in the institutions’ building projects varies: it is providing technical support to the Parliament for the construction of its new KAD II complex, but takes full responsibility for the management of Court of Justice building projects. 
Raven vključenosti pristojnega nacionalnega organa v gradbene projekte institucij se razlikuje. Parlamentu zagotavlja tehnično pomoč pri gradnji novega kompleksa KAD II, za vodenje gradbenih projektov Sodišča Evropske unije pa je prevzel vso odgovornost.
34 The Commission agreed with the Luxembourgish state to replace its main building in Luxembourg (the Jean-Monnet building - JMO). 
34 Komisija se je z Luksemburgom dogovorila o zamenjavi glavne zgradbe v Luxembourgu (stavbe Jean-Monnet – JMO).
In December 2015, subsequent to the Commission’s decision to vacate the JMO building28, they reached a political agreement on sharing the costs of temporary replacement accommodation. 
Decembra 2015 sta po odločitvi Komisije, da izprazni zgradbo JMO28, dosegla politični dogovor o delitvi stroškov za začasno nadomestno namestitev.
The replacement building (JMO II) will house the majority of local Commission staff and eliminate the need for most of its rented buildings. 
V nadomestni zgradbi (JMO II) bo večina lokalno zaposlenih pri Komisiji, s čimer ne bo več potrebe po večini najetih zgradb.
35 In 1998, the ECB signed an agreement with the government of the Federal Republic of Germany setting out the respective roles and responsibilities. 
35 ECB je leta 1998 z vlado Zvezne republike Nemčije podpisala sporazum o določitvi ustreznih vlog in odgovornosti.
The national authorities did not offer the ECB any preferential conditions for its building projects. 
Nacionalni organi ECB niso ponudili preferencialnih pogojev za njene gradbene projekte.
The ECB bought the land29 to build its headquarters from the city of Frankfurt under standard market conditions. 
ECB je zemljišče29 za gradnjo sedeža kupila od mesta Frankfurt pod standardnimi tržnimi pogoji.
However, as part of the purchase the city of Frankfurt committed to contribute to the costs arising from, inter alia, soil pollution as a result of the site’s previous use. 
Vendar pa se je mesto Frankfurt v okviru nakupa zavezalo, da bo prispevalo h kritju stroškov, nastalih na primer zaradi onesnaženja tal, ki je posledica prejšnje uporabe zemljišča.
21 27 The state has a pre-emptive right to acquire the buildings. 28 Basedon2013 technicalstudies,whichrevealedhigherrisksrelatedtothepresenceof asbestos in the building than previously assumed. 
28 Na podlagi tehničnih študij iz leta 2013, v katerih je bilo ugotovljeno večje tveganje v zvezi s prisotnostjo azbesta v zgradbi od predvidenega.
29 Grossmarkthalle site, Frankfurt’s former wholesale market hall, which is a listed historical monument, built in 1928. 
29 Lokacija Grossmarkthalle, nekdanje dvorane veleprodajne tržnice, zgrajene leta 1928, ki je zgodovinska stavba pod spomeniškim varstvom.
On the whole, decisions on obtaining office accommodation were sound 36 We analysed twelve of recently purchased and rented office buildings and ongoing construction projects of the Parliament30 and the Commission31, the institutions with the largest portfolio of buildings, in order to assess whether decisions were based on: — an assessment multiannual accommodation needs; — respect of budgetary constraints; — compliance with technical specifications; — market prospection; — cost-benefit analysis; — consideration of the costs linked to the entire life-cycle of buildings in terms of initial refurbishment, maintenance, running costs and renovation; — a comparison of financing options. 
31 MERO, MO15, PLB3, L15, ORBN, ARIA, LACC, JMO II in Drosbach D. 21 — upoštevanju proračunskih omejitev; — skladnosti s tehničnimi specifikacijami; — pregledu trga; — analizi stroškov in koristi; — upoštevanju stroškov, povezanih s celotnim življenjskim ciklom zgradb, kar zadeva začetno obnovo, vzdrževanje, tekoče stroške in prenovo; — primerjavi možnosti financiranja.
37 We found a few exceptions 32: (a) According to the Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation33, building contracts34 may be concluded by negotiated procedure after prospecting the local market. 
37 Sodišče je ugotovilo nekaj izjem32: (a) v skladu s pravili uporabe finančne uredbe33 se lahko pogodbe o nepremičninah34 sklenejo s postopkom pogajanj po pregledu lokalnega trga.
The Commission in principle applies the so-called “Kallas methodology”, which involves the prior publication of a building prospection notice. 
Komisija načeloma uporablja tako imenovano Kallasovo metodologijo, ki vključuje predhodno objavo obvestila o pregledu zgradbe.
However, the methodology was not applied in two cases included in our sample: for the ORBAN building in Brussels and for Drosbach – Wing D in Luxembourg. 
Vendar ta metodologija v dveh primerih, vključenih v vzorec, ni bila uporabljena: za zgradbo ORBAN v Bruslju in krilo D zgradbe Drosbach v Luxembourgu.
occupying adjoining buildings 35. The Commission plans to revise this methodology. (b) The Commission includes in its Notes to the Budgetary Authority36 a cost-benefit analysis of new projects. 
Odstopanje je bilo v obeh primerih utemeljeno s tem, da je Komisija že zasedala sosednji zgradbi.35 Komisija namerava to metodologijo revidirati; (b) Komisija v svoje obvestilo proračunskemu organu36 vključi analizo stroškov in koristi za nove projekte.
We found no evidence of such analysis in the JMO II project documentation. 
Sodišče v projektni dokumentaciji za stavbo JMO II ni našlo dokazov o taki analizi.
The project will be pre-financed by the Luxembourgish state and the Commission has the option to acquire the building once finalised. 
Projekt bo predhodno financirala država Luksemburg, Komisija pa ima možnost zgradbo kupiti, ko bo zgrajena.
There is no indication that the Commission analysed any other financing options. 
Nič ne kaže, da je Komisija analizirala katero koli drugo možnost financiranja.
Financing mechanisms of large construction projects are often complex thereby affecting budgetary transparency 38 Since 2013, it has been possible to finance building acquisition or construction through a commercial loan under the Financial Regulation37. 
Mehanizmi za financiranje velikih gradbenih projektov so pogosto kompleksni in so zato vplivali na proračunsko preglednost 38 Od leta 2013 je možno nakup ali gradnjo zgradbe na podlagi finančne uredbe37 financirati s komercialnim posojilom.
Most ongoing or recently completed construction projects started before this date. 
Večina gradbenih projektov, ki so v teku ali so bili nedavno končani, se je začela pred tem datumom.
To finance these projects (see the projects examined in paragraphs 43 to 50), the institutions often used complex financing methods involving state or financial intermediaries (see an example in Box 2). 
Institucije so za financiranje teh projektov (glej projekte, preučene v odstavkih 43 do 50) pogosto uporabile zapletene načine financiranja, ki so vključevali državo ali finančne posrednike (glej primer v okviru 2).
As a result, they are not directly in control of the financial aspects of the projects . 
Zato nimajo neposrednega nadzora nad finančnimi vidiki projektov.
23 Box2 Complex financing in Court of Justice construction projects Since 1994, the Luxembourgish national authorities have managed Court of Justice construction projects using a private developer that obtains the necessary funds on the financial markets. 
23 Okvir 2 Zapleteno financiranje gradbenih projektov Sodišča Evropske unije Od leta 1994 luksemburški nacionalni organi vodijo gradbene projekte Sodišča Evropske unije s pomočjo zasebnega investitorja, ki na finančnih trgih pridobi potrebna sredstva.
Once the rent payments will have covered all construction, financial and additional costs, the Court of Justice will take ownership of the building. 
Ko bodo s plačili najemnine pokriti vsi stroški gradnje, finančni in dodatni stroški, bo Sodišče Evropske unije postalo lastnik zgradbe.
The Luxembourgish national authorities and the private developer are legally responsible for the decisions taken. 
Luksemburški nacionalni organi in zasebni investitor so pravno odgovorni za sprejete odločitve.
Ultimately, however, the Court of Justice bears the cost. 
Vendar na koncu stroške krije Sodišče Evropske unije.
39 The Parliament obtained bank loans for the Konrad Adenauer building (KAD II) extension via a complex financing structure involving an intermediary company (owned by a commercial bank), which undertook financing of the project. 
39 Parlament je bančna posojila za razširitev zgradbe Konrad Adenauer (KAD II) pridobil z zapleteno strukturo financiranja, ki vključuje posredniško podjetje (v lasti komercialne banke), ki je prevzelo financiranje projekta.
The company signed two financing contracts, one with the EIB and one with a commercial bank providing each 50 % of the financing for the project. 
Podjetje je podpisalo dve pogodbi o financiranju, eno z EIB in eno s komercialno banko, pri čemer je vsaka zagotovila 50 % sredstev za projekt.
40 The Parliament and the Court of Justice pre-financed building projects using unused appropriations from other budget lines: — Between 2012 and 2016, the Parliament transferred €260 million from various budget lines to finance the KAD II project. 
40 Parlament in Sodišče Evropske unije sta gradbene projekte predhodno financirala z neporabljenimi proračunskimi sredstvi iz drugih proračunskih vrstic: — med letoma 2012 in 2016 je parlament za financiranje projekta KAD II iz različnih proračunskih vrstic prenesel 260 milijonov EUR.
Out of the €474 million credit line obtained, the Parliament used €16 million. 
Od pridobljene kreditne linije v višini 474 milijonov EUR je porabil 16 milijonov EUR.
The Parliament estimated that this saved interest costs up to €85 million. — Following the same mechanism, the Court of Justice has made prepayments for its building projects amounting to €89 million since 2007. 
Parlament je ocenil, da je s tem prihranil stroške obresti v višini do 85 milijonov EUR; — Sodišče Evropske unije je od leta 2007 na podlagi istega mehanizma izvedlo predplačila za svoje gradbene projekte v višini 89 milijonov EUR.
According to the Court of Justice, this significantly reduced the budget impact of lease-purchase payments to 2026 due to estimated savings on financing charges of more than €24 million over the whole period. 
Ta uredba se ne uporablja za ECB. financiranja v višini več kot 24 milijonov EUR v celotnem obdobju znatno zmanjšal proračunski vpliv plačil za zakup do leta 2026.
41 The Council paid the Belgian authorities advances for the Europa building project amounting to €294 million thanks to unused appropriations transferred from other budget lines. 
41 Svet je zaradi neporabljenih proračunskih sredstev, ki jih je prenesel iz drugih proračunskih vrstic, belgijskim organom za projekt gradnje zgradbe Europa plačal predujme v višini 294 milijonov EUR.
The advances paid by the Council yielded interest worth €10.3 million (net value).The advances paid over the first three years did not correspond to the progress of the work, so in practice the Council was pre-financing the project (see Box 3 below). 
Obresti predujmov, ki jih je plačal Svet, so znašali 10,3 milijona EUR (v neto vrednosti). Poleg tega predujmi, plačani v prvih treh letih, niso ustrezali napredku del, zato je Svet projekt dejansko predhodno financiral (glej okvir 3 spodaj).
25 Box3 Advances for the construction of the Council Europa building not reflecting the progress of the project In the agreement on the construction of the Europa building (formerly known as the ‘Residence Palace’) the Belgian state agreed to pre-finance the project. 
24 Okvir 3 Predujmi Sveta za gradnjo zgradbe Europa ne ustrezajo napredku projekta V sporazumu o gradnji zgradbe Europa (prej znane kot Residence Palace) se je Belgija strinjala, da bo projekt predhodno financirala.
However, over the first three years of the project (2008 to 201038), the Council paid to the Belgian state advances representing 82 % of the total estimated budget (€235 million) even though the costs incurred represented only 12 % of the budget and the construction phase of the project had not yet started39. The Council continued to pay advances of approximately €10 million a year until project completion. 
Vendar je Svet v prvih treh letih projekta (od leta 2008 do leta 201038) Belgiji plačal predujme v višini 82 % celotnega ocenjenega proračuna (235 milijonov EUR), čeprav so nastali stroški predstavljali le okrog 12 % proračuna, gradbena faza projekta pa se še ni začela.39 Svet je še naprej plačeval predujme v višini približno 10 milijonov EUR na leto do konca projekta.
42 Although some institutions (Parliament, Council) regularly made significant advance payments on their construction projects, they did not plan the amount of advances in the corresponding budget lines of the EU budget. 
42 Čeprav nekatere institucije (Parlament, Svet) redno plačujejo precejšnja predplačila za svoje gradbene projekte, v ustreznih proračunskih vrsticah proračuna EU niso upoštevale zneska predujmov.
This practice generally leads to a high level of budgetary transfers at year-end, which affects the transparency of the budgetary procedure. 
Ta praksa na splošno vodi do večje stopnje proračunskih prenosov ob koncu leta, kar vpliva na preglednost proračunskega postopka.
This pragmatic approach allows for the budget of the overall administrative expenditure to evolve in a stable manner over time. 
Zaradi tega pragmatičnega dostopa se lahko proračun za skupne upravne odhodke sčasoma stabilno razvija.
However, we do not consider that this practice saves money to the EU taxpayer as suggested by the EU institutions. 
Vendar pa se s tem po mnenju Sodišča ne prihrani davkoplačevalski denar, kot navajajo institucije EU.
Major construction projects are affected by delays and, in some cases, by substantial cost overruns 43 We analysed the implementation of four major construction projects carried out by the Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Justice. 
Na velike gradbene projekte vplivajo zamude in v nekaterih primerih znatne prekoračitve stroškov 43 Sodišče je analiziralo, kako Parlament, Svet, Komisija in Sodišče Evropske unije izvajajo štiri velike gradbene projekte.
38 The detailed convention was signed in March 2008; €235 million was paid until 31 December 2010. 
38 Podrobna konvencija je bila podpisana marca 2008; do 31. decembra 2010 je bilo plačanih 235 milijonov EUR.
39 Internal Audit report ’Acquisition du Résidence Palace’ of 8 June 2011. 
39 Notranje revizijsko poročilo Acquisition du Résidence Palace z dne 8. junija 2011.
The Court of Justice’s project: within budget and on schedule 44 In recent years, the Court of Justice has carried out three major construction projects 40 in close collaboration with the Luxembourgish authorities. The national authorities managed the works free of charge. 
Projekt Sodišča Evropske unije: v skladu s proračunom in roki 44 Sodišče Evropske unije je v zadnjih letih v tesnem sodelovanju z luksemburškimi organi izvedlo tri velike gradbene projekte.40 Nacionalni organi so dela vodili brezplačno.
They managed the tenders, ensured that studies and works were carried out correctly, and were responsible for quality control and obtaining the certification required by law. 
Vodili so javno naročanje, zagotovili pravilno izvajanje študij in del ter prevzeli odgovornost za nadzor kakovosti in pridobitev potrdil, ki jih določa zakon.
They provided their market knowledge, technical expertise and expertise in managing and supervising construction projects. 
Ponudili so svoje znanje o trgu, tehnično znanje ter strokovno znanje na področju upravljanja in nadzora gradbenih projektov.
Moreover, as the Court of Justice did not act as developer, only a small number of its staff were needed to follow-up the project. 
Ker Sodišče Evropske unije ni bilo v vlogi investitorja, je bilo za spremljanje projekta potrebnih le nekaj njegovih zaposlenih.
The projects were completed on schedule and with no additional costs. 
Projekti so bili končani v rokih in brez dodatnih stroškov.
At the time of our audit, the ongoing construction project of a third tower (CJ9 project) was within the estimated budget and on schedule. 
V času revizije Sodišča je bil projekt gradnje tretjega stolpa (projekt CJ9), ki je bil v teku, skladen z ocenjenim proračunom in roki.
The Council’s Europa project: within budget but delayed 45 In 200541, the Council delegated the management of the renovation of Block A of the ‘Residence Palace’ to the Belgian authorities. 
Projekt Sveta za zgradbo Europa: v skladu s proračunom, vendar zamuja 45 Svet je leta 200541 belgijske organe pooblastil za vodenje prenove bloka A zgradbe Residence Palace.
The building was to host meetings of the European Council and the Council of the European Union. 
V zgradbi naj bi bile seje Evropskega sveta in Sveta Evropske unije.
46 The final negotiated price42 did not significantly exceed the original budget: €246 million compared to €240 million in the original budget with both prices based on 2004 values. 
Znašala je 246 milijonov EUR v primerjavi s prvotnim proračunom v višini 240 milijonov EUR, pri čemer obe ceni temeljita na vrednostih iz leta 2004.
However, construction ended three years late. 
Vendar se je gradnja končala tri leta pozneje.
The delays were caused by 40 CJ4(2001-2008) RenovationofthePalaisand4th extensionoftheCourt’sbuildings (Anneau,Gallery,TowerA,TowerB);CJ8(2006-2013) RenovationandupgradingofAnnex buildings (Erasmus = Annex A, Thomas More = Annex B and Annex C); CJ9 (2013-ongoing) Construction of a fifth extension - 3rd Tower. 
Zamude so bile posledica sprememb zaradi nepredvidenih okoliščin.43 K zamudam so prispevale številne slabosti vodenja projekta: 40 CJ4 (2001–2008) – prenova zgradbe Palais in 4. razširitev zgradb Sodišča (Anneau, Gallery, stolp A, stolp B); CJ8 (2006–2013) – prenova in nadgradnja zgradb Annex (Erasmus = Annex A, Thomas More = Annex B in Annex C); CJ9 (2013–v teku) gradnja pete razširitve – 3. stolp.