natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These are necessarily of a more general nature with more concrete objectives being set out under the relevant initiatives. (b) Even if EU funds used do not have specific indicators and targets relating to radicalisation, the effectiveness and value for money of projects addressing radicalisation are evaluated through programme and specific indicators that reflect the scope and goals of the different funding programmes/funds. 
Ti cilji so seveda bolj splošni; konkretnejši cilji so določeni v okviru posameznih pobud. (b) Čeprav za sklade EU, ki se uporabljajo na področju boja proti radikalizaciji, ni specifičnih kazalnikov in ciljev v zvezi z radikalizacijo, se uspešnost in stroškovna učinkovitost projektov za boj proti radikalizaciji ocenjujeta s programskimi ter specifičnimi kazalniki, ki odražajo obseg in cilje različnih programov financiranja/skladov.
Such evaluation is carried out systematically under each fund. 
Takšne ocene se izvedejo sistematično za vsak sklad.
For instance programmes such as Erasmus+ supporting quality inclusive education and the promotion of common values, are measured for their effectiveness through programme and sector-specific objectives and indicators. 
Na primer, uspešnost programov, kot je Erasmus+, ki podpirajo kakovostno in vključujoče izobraževanje ter spodbujanje skupnih vrednot, se ocenjuje s pomočjo ciljev in kazalnikov, ki se nanašajo na ustrezen program in sektor.
Costing estimates are usually related to such broader, education-related objectives rather than to radicalisation as such given their indirect contribution to preventing radicalisation. (c) A comprehensive overview of all counter-radicalisation actions, with the exception of EU actions managed by the Member States, was provided in the framework of the July 2017 comprehensive assessment of EU security policy providing information about funds and costs (see reply to paragraph 26). (d) It would be extremely challenging to fully set out the costs of addressing radicalisation, in particular for actions pursuing multiple purposes and for actions having different timelines. 
Ocene stroškov se prej kot na radikalizacijo samo običajno nanašajo na širše cilje, povezane z izobraževanjem, saj ti neposredno prispevajo k preprečevanju radikalizacije. (c) V okviru celovite ocene varnostne politike EU iz julija 2017 je bil izveden podroben pregled vseh ukrepov za boj proti radikalizaciji razen ukrepov EU, ki jih upravljajo države članice. Ta pregled je zagotovil informacije o sredstvih in stroških (glej odgovor na odstavek 26). (d) Izredno težko bi bilo v celoti določiti stroške odpravljanja radikalizacije, zlasti kadar so ukrepi večnamenski ali imajo različne časovne okvire.
Commission points out that policy documents such as the different Communications on radicalisation shall not include specific and exhaustive references to the financial means made available for certain actions. 
Komisija poudarja, da dokumenti politike, kot so različna sporočila o radikalizaciji, ne smejo vključevati specifičnih in izčrpnih navedb finančnih sredstev, ki so na voljo za nekatere ukrepe.
Commission Communications are not the documents in which specific financial engagements are recorded or announced. 
V sporočilih Komisije se specifične finančne obveznosti ne navajajo oziroma ne objavljajo. 3
Measuring the effectiveness of preventive actions is intrinsically difficult and requires close cooperation between the Commission, Member States, individual stakeholders and researchers. 
Ocenjevanje uspešnosti preventivnih ukrepov je samo po sebi težko in zahteva tesno sodelovanje med Komisijo, državami članicami, posameznimi deležniki in raziskovalci.
It is a gradual process with evaluation techniques being progressively explored and applied. 
Gre za postopen proces, v katerem se tehnike ocenjevanja postopoma proučujejo in uporabljajo.
As pointed out in the CommissionŐs comprehensive assessment of security policies, there is a need to better evaluate results and effectiveness and for the Commission to continue to explore ways to better demonstrate effectiveness of its actions. 
Kakor je poudarila Komisija v svoji celoviti oceni varnostnih politik, obstaja potreba po boljši oceni rezultatov in uspešnosti, Komisija pa mora še naprej proučevati, kako bolje dokazati uspešnost svojih ukrepov.
The Commission considers that the appraisal of the performance of the RAN CoE goes beyond a mere listing of events and activities but contains an evaluation of each task, as the RAN Annual progress report for 2016 (APR 2016) clearly demonstrates. 
Komisija meni, da je merjene uspešnosti centra odličnosti mreže RAN več kot zgolj naštevanje dogodkov in dejavnosti, saj vsebuje tudi oceno vsake posamezne naloge, kakor je jasno razvidno iz letnega poročila mreže RAN za leto 2016 (april 2016).
The selection process under EU funding instruments includes an assessment of the robustness of the evaluation and monitoring strategy proposed by the applicants and is part of the analysis of the strength and weaknesses of the different projects. 
Postopek izbire v okviru instrumentov financiranja EU vključuje oceno zanesljivosti strategije ocenjevanja in spremljanja, ki jo predlagajo vložniki, in je del analize prednosti in pomanjkljivosti posameznih projektov.
This assessment is shared with the applicants in order to encourage them to improve their project's construction. 
Vložniki so seznanjeni z oceno, kar naj bi jih spodbudilo, da izboljšajo pripravo svojih projektov.
It also feeds into the Commission's monitoring strategy of the project when it is ongoing. 
Hkrati pa oceno upošteva Komisija pri strategiji spremljanja projektov pri projektih v teku.
However, the quality of the evaluation and monitoring strategy embedded in a project is not the only element to decide for its selection. 
Vendar kakovost strategije ocenjevanja in spremljanja ni edino merilo za izbiro določenega projekta.
Indeed, projects are firstly selected based on their relevance to the policy objective set in the calls for proposals and their EU added value (e.g. whether they involve or impact on several Member States). 
Projekti se izberejo na podlagi njihove ustreznosti glede na cilje politike, določene v razpisih za zbiranje predlogov, in njihove dodane vrednosti na ravni EU (npr. ali vključujejo več držav članic oziroma ali bodo vplivali na več držav članic).
In addition, the absence of effectiveness indicators does not imply that the effectiveness cannot be assessed, since projects are required to provide a detailed narrative report which allows the Commission to assess whether the project made an effective contribution to the achievement of the policy goal. 
Poleg tega neobstoj kazalnikov uspešnosti še ne pomeni, da uspešnosti ni mogoče oceniti, saj je treba za projekte predložiti podrobno opisno poročilo, ki Komisiji omogoča, da oceni, ali je projekt dejansko prispeval k doseganju cilja politike.
Payments for EU co-funded projects are based on whether the project was implemented in compliance with its initial objectives. 
Plačila za projekte s podporo EU so odvisna od tega, ali se je projekt izvajal v skladu s svojimi prvotnimi cilji.
As part of this final assessment, the Commission evaluates a number of elements, including quality, usefulness and transferability of the results. 
Pri končni oceni Komisija ovrednoti več elementov, vključno s kakovostjo, uporabnostjo in prenosljivostjo rezultatov.
Evaluations of individual projects feed then in the general evaluation of the financial programme, which is carried out with the help of external evaluators. 
Ocene posameznih projektov se upoštevajo pri splošni oceni finančnega programa, ki se izvede s pomočjo zunanjih ocenjevalcev.
For example, the ISEC programme overall, the individual calls and the project results are generally very positively perceived by Member States and stakeholders as stated in the ex-post evaluation of "Prevention and fight against crime" 2007-2013 Programme ISEC. 
Kakor je navedeno v naknadni oceni programa ISEC za obdobje 2007–2013 z naslovom Preprečevanje kriminala in boj proti njemu, imajo države članice in deležniki na splošno zelo pozitivno mnenje o programu ISEC kot celoti ter o posameznih razpisih za zbiranje predlogov in rezultatih projektov.
Finally, the evaluations are complemented by other tools through which the Commission strengthens the evidence base for individual interventions. 
Ocene nato dopolnijo drugi instrumenti, s katerimi Komisija krepi dokazno podlago posameznih ukrepov.
For instance through the tools developed by the EU funded project IMPACT, project managers are helped to carry out better evaluations of the effectiveness of their actions. 
Na primer, instrumenti, oblikovani v okviru projekta IMPACT, ki je prejel sredstva EU, projektnim vodjem omogočajo, da izboljšajo ocenjevanje uspešnosti njihovih ukrepov.
Furthermore, for instance for specific EU funded projects (such as those to be funded under the Civil Society Empowerment Programme) the Commission foresees an ex-post evaluation of the programme given the innovative nature of alternative and counter narratives. 
Poleg tega, na primer pri posebnih projektih, financiranih iz skladov EU (npr. projekti v okviru programa za krepitev civilne družbe) Komisija predvidi naknadno oceno programa zaradi inovativnosti alternativnega in protipropagandnega diskurza.
And as part of the follow up on the interim report of the HLCEG-R, the Commission will explore together with Member States how to better evaluate relevant programmes and interventions. 
V okviru nadaljnjih ukrepov, ki bodo sledili vmesnemu poročilu strokovne skupine Komisije na visoki ravni za vprašanje radikalizacije, bo Komisija skupaj z državami članicami proučila, kako izboljšati ocenjevanje ustreznih programov in ukrepov.
The Commission has, along with Europol, been requesting data on the removal of terrorist content from the internet companies with only limited feedback. 
Tako kot Europol tudi Komisija od internetnih podjetij zahteva podatke o odstranjevanju terorističnih vsebin z interneta, vendar je odziv podjetij omejen.
Furthermore, the Internet Referral Management Application which Europol has developed will help ensure co-ordination with Member States, thereby reducing the likelihood of duplication. With regard to addressing the 4 
Poleg tega bo aplikacija za upravljanje prijavljanja sumljivih spletnih vsebin, ki jo je razvil Europol, pomagala pri usklajevanju z državami članicami in tako zmanjšala možnost podvajanja.
whack-a-mole effect, the Commission hopes that the Database of Hashes, developed by the companies themselves, will help prevent the re-uploading of terrorist content and its dissemination. 
Glede preprečevanja vedno novega nalaganja terorističnih vsebin na splet Komisija upa, da bo podatkovna zbirka ključnikov, ki so jo razvila podjetja sama, pomagala pri preprečevanju ponovnega nalaganja terorističnih vsebin na splet in njihovega razširjanja.
In that respect, under the Forum, Europol has offered its support in ensuring the optimisation of this tool. 
Europol je v okviru foruma ponudil svojo pomoč pri zagotavljanju optimizacije tega instrumenta. 4
The EU IRU (Internet Referral Unit) has a so-called de-confliction procedure in place to ensure that Member States have a say in what content is referred by the EU IRU to companies, thus avoiding any negative effects of referrals and subsequent removals which could jeopardise investigations. 
Enota EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin je vzpostavila tako imenovan postopek za odpravo konfliktov, ki naj bi državam članicam zagotovil, da soodločajo o vsebinah, ki jih enota EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin sporoči podjetjem. Tako bi se preprečili kakršni koli negativni učinki prijav in naknadne odstranitve vsebin, ki bi lahko ogrozili preiskave.
Furthermore, the EU IRU is focusing on online propaganda which the terrorists want to use to attract as many followers as possible. 
Poleg tega se enota EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin osredotoča na spletno propagando, ki jo uporabljajo teroristi, da bi dosegli čim več sledilcev.
If these prevention methods are to be fully effective, it could actually decrease the burden on operational partners in the longer term, as there would be fewer investigations. 
Če bi se te metode preprečevanja v celoti uporabljale, bi lahko dolgoročno dejansko zmanjšale obremenitev operativnih partnerjev, saj bi se zmanjšalo število preiskav.
The above actions are in line with the EU Internet Forum Action Plan agreed in July 2017; the actions also include reporting arrangements based on a number of indicators. 
Vsi zgoraj navedeni ukrepi so v skladu z akcijskim načrtom internetnega foruma EU, sprejetim julija 2017. Ukrepi vključujejo tudi ureditev glede poročanja na podlagi skupine kazalnikov.
The Commission's recommendation on illegal content online builds on the progress under the EU Internet Forum and establishes reporting arrangements. 
Priporočilo Komisije v zvezi z nezakonitimi spletnimi vsebinami temelji na napredku, doseženem v okviru internetnega foruma EU.
The Commission has tasked the RAN Center of Excellence (RAN CoE) to report on the effectiveness of its actions. 
Komisija je center odličnosti Mreže EU za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji (RAN) zadolžila, da poroča o uspešnosti svojih ukrepov.
Under the framework contract, the RAN CoE is asked to report in its Quarterly Progress Reports and in particular the Annual Progress Reports (APR) on how its actions contribute to achieving policy objectives pursued. 
Center RAN na podlagi okvirne pogodbe pripravlja četrtletna poročila o napredku ter zlasti letno poročilo o napredku, v katerih analizira, kako ukrepi centra prispevajo k doseganju ciljev politike.
From 2017, the APR therefore contains under each task such an evaluation. 
Od leta 2017 letna poročila o napredku vsebujejo takšno oceno za vsako posamezno nalogo.
These reports do not list Ňonly activitiesÓ. 
Ta poročila niso omejena na golo navajanje dejavnosti.
In addition, the RAN carries out surveys (even if not in a systematic manner) in particular in relation to some (key) events. 
Poleg tega mreža RAN izvaja raziskave (čeprav ne sistematično), zlasti v zvezi z nekaterimi (ključnimi) dogodki.
Furthermore, the Commission assesses together with the members of the RAN CoE Steering Committee progress, challenges and scope for improvement based on an evaluation of the work of the RAN CoE (e.g. in terms of outreach to the relevant stakeholders, scope for improving dissemination and transferability of learnings). 
Poleg tega Komisija v sodelovanju s člani usmerjevalnega odbora centra odličnosti RAN ocenjuje napredek, izzive in možnosti za izboljšave na podlagi ocene delovanja centra odličnosti RAN (npr. glede doseganja zadevnih deležnikov, možnosti za izboljšanje razširjanja in prenosljivosti pridobljenega znanja in izkušenj).
These Steering Committee meetings take place on a quarterly basis. 
Usmerjevalni odbor se sestane vsako četrtletje.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 40.
Since 2017, within the framework of the Security Union Task Force and its dedicated subgroup on radicalisation, the Commission has improved its overview of EU funded actions and is able to identify synergies between different funds and actions. 
Komisija je od leta 2017 v okviru projektne skupine za varnostno unijo in njene podskupine za vprašanje radikalizacije izboljšala svoj pregled nad ukrepi, financiranimi iz skladov EU, in je sposobna prepoznati sinergije med različnimi skladi in ukrepi.
A first overview of funding possibilities and projects has been established as part of the work of the Security Union Task Force subgroup on radicalisation and is used by the services to identify synergies and pool relevant knowledge and experiences. 
V okviru podskupine za vprašanje radikalizacije, ki deluje v okviru projektne skupine za varnostno unijo, je bil določen prvi pregled možnosti financiranja in projektov. Pregled je ustreznim službam v pomoč pri ugotavljanju sinergij ter zbiranju ustreznega znanja in izkušenj.
The Commission would like to highlight that a closer engagement with Member States is one of the findings of the HLCEG-R, which is already being followed up with concrete steps (e.g. policy and practice events between policymakers and practitioners already scheduled in 2018). 
Komisija želi poudariti, da je tesnejše sodelovanje z državami članicami ena izmed ugotovitev skupine Komisije na visoki ravni za vprašanje radikalizacije in da so tej ugotovitvi že sledili konkretni ukrepi (npr. dogodki, načrtovani za leto 2018, za izmenjavo strokovnega znanja in praks med oblikovalci politik in strokovnjaki v praksi).
These are necessarily of a more general nature with more concrete objectives being set out under the relevant initiatives. 
Ti cilji so seveda bolj splošni; konkretnejši cilji so določeni v okviru posameznih pobud.
Please see Commission replies to paragraphs 29 and 30. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavka 29 in 30.
The Commission underlines that individual projects and initiatives are evaluated and their achievements are recorded. 
Komisija poudarja, da se posamezni projekti in pobude ocenjujejo in njihovi rezultati beležijo.
This feeds into the general evaluation of the funds and programmes. 
To je del splošne ocene skladov in programov.
Please see Commission replies to paragraphs 32 to 36. 
Glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 32 do 36.
Recommendation 3 The Commission accepts recommendation 3. 6 
Priporočilo 3 Komisija sprejema priporočilo 3. 6
Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 25.10.2016 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 8.2.2018 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 20.3.2018 CommissionŐs (or other auditeeŐs) official replies received in all languages 25.4.2018 
Dogodek Datum Sprejetje revizijskega memoranduma / začetek revizije 25.10.2016 Osnutek poročila uradno poslan Komisiji (ali drugemu revidirancu) 8.2.2018 Sprejetje končnega poročila po razčiščevalnem postopku 20.3.2018 Prejeti uradni odgovori Komisije (ali drugega revidiranca) v vseh jezikih 25.4.2018
Radicalisation is the phenomenon of people embracing ideas which could lead them to commit acts of terrorism. 
Radikalizacija je pojav, pri katerem ljudje sprejmejo ideje, ki bi lahko privedle do terorističnih dejanj.
The Commission supports Member States in their efforts to tackle radicalisation, for example through the exchange of good practices. 
Komisija države članice podpira pri njihovih prizadevanjih za boj proti radikalizaciji, na primer z izmenjavo dobrih praks.
In doing so it draws on a wide range of EU funds. 
Pri tem uporablja vse širši nabor skladov EU.
We examined whether the Commission managed its support well. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali je Komisija dobro upravljala svojo podporo.
We found that the Commission addressed the needs of Member States and promoted cooperation through relevant initiatives such as the Radicalisation Awareness Network. 
Ugotovilo je, da je upoštevala potrebe držav članic in z ustreznimi pobudami, kot je Mreža za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji, spodbujala sodelovanje.
However, there were some shortfalls in the CommissionŐs overall coordination of actions addressing radicalisation and in its framework for evaluating the effectiveness of its support. 
Vendar so pri splošnem usklajevanju ukrepov za odziv na radikalizacijo, ki ga je izvajala Komisija, in njenem okviru za vrednotenje uspešnosti njene podpore obstajale nekatere pomanjkljivosti.
We therefore make a number of recommendations to improve the CommissionŐs coordination so that it can make the most of potential synergies, and to improve the framework for assessing results. 
Sodišče je zato dalo več priporočil za izboljšanje usklajevanja Komisije, da bi se lahko kar najbolje izkoristila potencialna sinergija in izboljšal okvir za ocenjevanje rezultatov.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors Š European Union, 2018 For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the European Union copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Vprašanja: eca.europa.eu/sl/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Spletišče: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors ©Evropska unija, 2018. Za dovoljenje za uporabo ali reprodukcijo fotografij ali drugega gradiva, za katere Evropska unija nima avtorskih pravic, je treba zaprositi neposredno imetnike avtorskih pravic.
EN 2018 Special Report NO 15 Strengthening the capacity of the internal security forces in Niger and Mali: only limited and slow progress (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
15 Posebno poročilo SL 2018 Krepitev zmogljivosti notranjih varnostnih sil v Nigru in Maliju: le zmeren in počasen napredek (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
This performance audit was carried out by Audit Chamber III External actions/Security and justice, headed by ECA Member Karel Pinxten. 
To revizijo smotrnosti je opravil revizijski senat III – zunanji ukrepi, varnost in pravica – , ki mu predseduje član Evropskega računskega sodišča Karel Pinxten.
The audit was led by ECA Member Bettina Jakobsen, supported by Katja Mattfolk, Head of Private Office and Kim Storup, Private Office Attach; Beatrix Lesiewicz, Principal Manager; Kim Hubl, Head of Task and Torielle Perreur-Lloyd, Auditor. 
Revizijo je vodila članica Evropskega računskega sodišča Bettina Jakobsen, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njenega kabineta Katja Mattfolk, ataše v njenem kabinetu Kim Storup, vodilna upravna uslužbenka Beatrix Lesiewicz, vodja naloge Kim Hublé in revizorka Torielle Perreur-Lloyd.
From left to right: Torielle Perreur-Lloyd, Kim Hubl, Bettina Jakobsen, Katja Mattfolk. 
Od leve proti desni: Torielle Perreur-Lloyd, Kim Hublé, Bettina Jakobsen, Katja Mattfolk.
Stakeholders and beneficiaries had a positive view of the MissionsŐ activities and of their coordination role 61 - 62 Conclusions and recommendations 63 - 69 Annex I Đ Ongoing CSDP Missions and Operations Annex II Đ Extracts from Council Decisions (CFSP) 2016/1172 (Niger) and 2017/50 (Mali) Annex III Đ ECA overview of progress made by EUCAP Sahel Niger towards achieving tasks Annex IV Đ ECA overview of progress made by EUCAP Sahel Mali towards achieving tasks Replies of the European External Action Service and the Commission 3 
Zaključki in priporočila 63–69 Priloga I – Obstoječe misije in operacije v okviru SVOP Priloga II – Izvlečki iz sklepov Sveta (SZVP) 2016/1172 (Niger) in 2017/50 (Mali) Priloga III – Pregled napredka misije EUCAP Sahel Niger pri izpolnjevanju nalog, ki ga je pripravilo Evropsko računsko sodišče Priloga IV – Pregled napredka misije EUCAP Sahel Mali pri izpolnjevanju nalog, ki ga je pripravilo Evropsko računsko sodišče Odgovora Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje in Komisije 3
GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATIONS CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CIVCOM Committee for Civilian Aspects of Crisis Management: an advisory body established by the Council which provides information, formulates recommendations and gives advice on civilian aspects of crisis management. 
GLOSAR IN KRATICE 4 CIVCOM Civilna zmogljivost za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij (CPCC) Direktorat za krizno upravljanje in načrtovanje (CMPD) ESZD EU EUCAP EUTM GIZ Koncept kriznega upravljanja Koncept operacij (CONOPS) Odbor za civilne vidike kriznega upravljanja je svetovalni organ, ki ga je ustanovil Svet.
CMPD Crisis Management and Planning Directorate: the department within EEAS responsible for the politico-strategic planning of civilian CSDP Missions. 
Oddelek ESZD, pristojen za politično-strateško načrtovanje civilnih misij SVOP.
The CMPDŐs role is to ensure the coherence and effectiveness of the Missions and develop CSDP partnerships, policies, concepts and capabilities. 
Naloga direktorata je zagotoviti skladnost in uspešnost misij ter razviti partnerstva, politike, koncepte in zmogljivosti SVOP.