natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Farm incomes are higher (also per labour unit) for bigger farms17. In calculating the income gap between farming and the economy as a whole, the Commission includes all 10.8 million EU agricultural holdings, including 7.2 million with less than 5 hectares, and 6 million with annual standard output below €4 00018. 
Dohodki kmetov so višji (tudi na enoto dela) na večjih kmetijah.17 Komisija je pri izračunu razlike v dohodkih med kmetijstvom in gospodarstvom kot celoto upoštevala vseh 10,8 milijona kmetijskih gospodarstev v EU, vključno s 7,2 milijona gospodarstev, manjših od 5 hektarov, in 6 milijoni gospodarstev z letno standardno proizvodnjo, manjšo od 4 000 EUR.18 Učinek dolgega repa teh zelo majhnih kmetij, ki se pogosto spoprijemajo z neločljivo povezanimi izzivi donosnosti, izkrivlja sliko.
The income situation of medium size farms between 5 and 250 hectares, which, according to the Commission, receive 72 % of EU direct support, is better. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf Hill, B. & Dylan Bradley, B. 
Dohodkovni položaj srednjih kmetij, velikih od 5 do 250 hektarov, ki po navedbah Komisije prejmejo 72 % neposredne podpore EU, je boljši.
In addition to addressing the standard of living for the agricultural community, the Commission argues that direct payments ensure there is agricultural activity in all parts of the Union including in areas with natural constraints (which also receive income payments under Rural Development Policy) with various economic, environmental and social associated benefits, including the delivery of public goods. 
Komisija trdi, da neposredna plačila poleg tega, da pripomorejo k življenjskemu standardu kmetijske skupnosti, zagotavljajo obstoj kmetijske dejavnosti v vseh delih Unije, tudi na območjih z naravnimi omejitvami (ki prejemajo plačila tudi v okviru politike razvoja podeželja), kar prinaša različne gospodarske, okoljske in družbene koristi, med drugim zagotavljanje javnih dobrin.
The validity of these arguments depends on the solidity of the data supporting them. 
Verodostojnost teh trditev je odvisna od zanesljivosti podatkov, na katerih temeljijo.
Lack of clarity on EU value added 24. 
Nejasnost v zvezi z dodano vrednostjo EU 24.
Making EU value added a core objective is one of Commission’s proposals for all future EU policies19. EU value added is usually understood as additional results delivered by EU action that could not have been achieved by uncoordinated action at national, regional or local level. 
Eden od predlogov Komisije za vse prihodnje politike EU je, naj dodana vrednost EU postane osrednji cilj.19 Dodana vrednost EU se običajno razume kot dodatni rezultat ukrepanja EU, ki ga ne bi bilo mogoče doseči z neusklajenim ukrepanjem na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni.
However, there is no commonly accepted definition for this concept. 
Vendar ta pojem nima splošno sprejete opredelitve.
Agreeing on and applying such a definition would benefit public debate and decision-making on future EU spending. 
uporaba take opredelitve pojma bi bila koristna za javno razpravo in odločanje o prihodnji porabi EU.
Responding to long-term trends 25. 
Odziv na dolgoročne trende 25.
Under the current arrangements the proposal for the next multiannual financial framework (and for all major policy areas, including the CAP) is made two years before its start and payments for multiannual programmes (such as those under Pillar 2 of the CAP) continue for the first three years of the following multiannual financial framework. 
V skladu s sedanjimi ureditvami se predlog za naslednji večletni finančni okvir (in vsa večja področja politik, vključno s SKP) pripravi dve leti pred njegovim začetkom, plačila na podlagi večletnih programov (kot so plačila na podlagi drugega stebra SKP) pa se nadaljujejo prva tri leta naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira.
This means that policy decisions will cover payments made up to 12 years later. 
To pomeni, da bodo odločitve o politiki zajemale plačila, izvedena do 12 let pozneje.
The CAP’s impact on fairness and the single market 26. 
Vpliv SKP na pravičnost in enotni trg 26.
Due to their link to farm area, the largest share of direct payments go to the largest farms (with around 80 % of the support received by 20 % of beneficiaries). 
Največji delež neposrednih plačil se zaradi njihove povezanosti s kmetijskimi površinami izplača največjim kmetijam (pri čemer približno 80 % podpore prejme 20 % upravičencev).
Various redistributive mechanisms used so far (e.g. capping and redistributive payments) have had a limited effect. 
Različni prerazporeditveni mehanizmi, uporabljeni do zdaj (npr. določitev zgornje meje in prerazporeditvena plačila), so imeli le delen učinek.
The move to converge rates per hectare, both between and (in the case of the basic payment scheme) within Member States can increase payments to some larger farms. 
S prehodom na približevanje stopenj pomoči na hektar tako med državami članicami kot (v primeru sheme osnovnega plačila) v njih bi se lahko povečala plačila za nekatere večje kmetije.
Some Member States applying the basic payment scheme have also used the option to preserve high support levels resulting from past levels of subsidy. 
Nekatere države članice, ki uporabljajo shemo osnovnega plačila, so izkoristile tudi možnost ohranitve visokih ravni podpore, ki izhajajo iz preteklih ravni subvencij.
Payment levels between Member States can therefore vary significantly. 
Zato se lahko ravni plačil med državami članicami zelo razlikujejo.
Payments per hectare can range from below €100 to over €1 000. 
Plačila lahko znašajo od manj kot 100 EUR do več kot 1 000 EUR na hektar.
CAP Objectives 17 What the Commission’s Communication says on objectives: • The three CAP objectives are: o to foster a “smart and resilient” agricultural sector; o to bolster environmental care and climate action and to contribute to the environmental and climate objectives of the EU; o to strengthen the socio-economic fabric of rural areas. • Need for consistency with commitments under the Paris Agreement on climate, agreed by the Conference of the Parties within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Sustainable Development Goals. • Fair contribution to EU 2030 Climate and Energy targets. • The Commission would assess and approve CAP strategic plans and so maximise the CAP’s contribution to EU priorities and objectives and Member States’ climate and energy targets. • The CAP should lead a transition towards a more sustainable agriculture. 
18 Cilji SKP 19 Kaj je v sporočilu Komisije navedeno o ciljih • Trije cilji SKP so: o ustvariti podlago za pameten in odporen kmetijski sektor, o okrepiti skrb za okolje in podnebne ukrepe ter prispevati k doseganju okoljskih in podnebnih ciljev EU, o krepiti družbeno-ekonomsko tkivo podeželskih območij. • Potreba po skladnosti z zavezami iz Pariškega sporazuma o podnebnih spremembah, ki ga je sprejela konferenca pogodbenic kot del Okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja, in cilji Organizacije združenih narodov za trajnostni razvoj. • Pravično prispevanje k ciljnim vrednostim na področju podnebja in energije EU za leto 2030. • Komisija naj bi ocenila in odobrila strateške načrte SKP ter tako čim bolj povečala prispevek SKP k prednostnim nalogam in ciljem EU ter ciljnim vrednostim držav članic na področju podnebja in energije. • SKP bi morala biti na čelu prehoda na bolj trajnostno kmetijstvo.
The Communication’s post-2020 CAP interpretation of Treaty objectives is broadly in line with the CAP objectives for the current period (see Annex II). 
V sporočilu se razlaga ciljev za SKP po letu 2020, ki temeljijo na ciljih v Pogodbi, v glavnem ujema s cilji SKP za sedanje obdobje (glej Prilogo II).
Insufficient clarity and specificity of objectives 28. 
Cilji niso dovolj jasni niti dovolj specifični 28.
Some CAP measures have unclear objectives. 
Nekateri ukrepi SKP imajo nejasne cilje.
For example, the objective of the greening measure introduced with the last CAP reform – to enhance the CAP’s environmental performance – lacked specific targets for the measure’s contribution to the environment and climate. 
Na primer, za cilj zelene komponente, ki je bil uveden v okviru zadnje reforme SKP, tj. izboljšanje okoljske smotrnosti SKP, niso določene specifične ciljne vrednosti za okoljski in podnebni prispevek ukrepa.
Objectives should be quantified where possible, not just for outputs, but also results and impacts20. Need for consistency with other EU objectives 29. 
20 treba cilje količinsko opredeliti – ne le v zvezi z izložki, temveč tudi v zvezi z rezultati in učinki.20 Potreba po skladnosti z drugimi cilji EU 29.
EU policies cover many different issues, areas and sectors. 
Politike EU zajemajo veliko različnih zadev, področij in sektorjev.
The CAP’s objectives should be consistent with those of other policies (including cohesion, climate action and environmental protection). 
Cilji SKP bi morali biti skladni s cilji drugih politik (vključno s kohezijo, podnebnimi ukrepi in varstvom okolja).
Where relevant, the CAPs contribution to achieving other EU objectives should be defined. 
Kadar je ustrezno, bi bilo treba opredeliti prispevek SKP k doseganju drugih ciljev EU.
This also concerns EU objectives in the form of binding international commitments21. 30. 
To velja tudi za cilje EU, ki izhajajo iz zavezujočih mednarodnih zavez.21 30.
Different EU policy areas have overlapping objectives regarding, for example, territorial balance/cohesion, social inclusion and reduction of poverty. 
Cilji glede, na primer, ozemeljskega ravnovesja/teritorialne kohezije, socialne vključenosti in zmanjšanja revščine na različnih področjih politike EU se prekrivajo.
Improving the CAP’s complementarity with other EU policies would be a positive development. 
Boljše dopolnjevanje SKP z drugimi politikami EU bi pomenilo napredek.
For example, we found little evidence that the aims of complementarity and synergy between the ESI funds were put into practice in the partnership agreements (introduced for 2014-2020) and in the rural development programmes. 
Sodišče je na primer našlo le malo dokazov, da sta se cilja dopolnjevanja in sinergije med skladi ESI v praksi uporabila v partnerskih sporazumih (za obdobje 2014–2020) in programih za razvoj podeželja.
CAP inputs 18 What the Commission’s Communication says on inputs: • In order not to pre-empt the outcome of the ongoing broader debate about the future of EU finances, the Communication does not address the size of the post-2020 CAP budget. • The Communication does not provide a clear link between future inputs and the assessment of performance. 
Vložki pri SKP Kaj je v sporočilu Komisije navedeno o vložkih • Da sporočilo ne bi posegalo v izid potekajoče obsežne razprave o prihodnosti financ EU, v njem ni obravnavana velikost proračuna za SKP po letu 2020. • Sporočilo ne vsebuje jasne povezave med prihodnjimi vložki in oceno smotrnosti.
The allocation of funds is not sufficiently based on needs or expected EU value added 31. 
Dodelitev sredstev ne temelji dovolj na potrebah ali pričakovani dodani vrednosti EU 31.
CAP funds are allocated to Member States in the form of national ‘envelopes’, which are not determined on the basis of Member States’ needs nor commitments to deliver specific results. 
Sredstva v okviru SKP se državam članicam dodelijo kot nacionalna sredstva, ki se ne določijo niti na podlagi potreb držav članic niti na podlagi zavez za zagotovitev specifičnih Svetovna banka, Thinking CAP: Supporting Agricultural Jobs and Incomes in the EU, 2017.
Instead, Member States then have to come up with measures to spend the pre-defined ‘envelopes’. 
Namesto tega morajo države članice pripraviti ukrepe za porabo vnaprej določenih sredstev.
This method poses risks to the performance orientation of spending. 
Ta metoda pomeni tveganje za usmerjenost odhodkov v smotrnost.
We noted that rural development programmes often do not provide convincing justification for the allocation of funds between measures and objectives. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da programi za razvoj podeželja pogosto ne vsebujejo prepričljivih utemeljitev za dodelitev sredstev za ukrepe in cilje.
Funding may be allocated where it is likely to be fully spent, rather than where it addresses key needs and produces results. 
Sredstva se lahko dodelijo za zadeve, za katere obstaja verjetnost, da bodo v celoti porabljena, namesto za tiste, ki obravnavajo ključne potrebe in prinašajo rezultate.
Co-financing rates do not, in general, reflect differences between different measures’ potential to deliver EU value added. 
Stopnje sofinanciranja v glavnem ne odražajo razlik med sposobnostmi za zagotavljanje dodane vrednosti EU, ki jih imajo različni ukrepi.
Refocussing EU funds on measures with the highest EU value added would improve the sound financial management of the policy. 
S ponovno osredotočenostjo sredstev EU na ukrepe z najvišjo dodano vrednostjo EU bi se izboljšalo dobro finančno poslovodenje na tem področju.
The OECD22 defines performance budgeting as "budgeting that links the funds allocated to measurable results". 
OECD22 pripravo proračuna na podlagi rezultatov opredeljuje kot pripravo proračuna, ki dodeljena finančna sredstva povezuje z merljivimi rezultati.
The Commission did not accept our recent recommendation to apply the concept of a performance budget which links each increment in resources to an increment in outputs or other results, to the funding of cohesion policy interventions for the post-2020 period where appropriate. 
Komisija ni sprejela nedavnega priporočila Sodišča, naj, kadar je primerno, za financiranje intervencij na področju kohezije v obdobju po letu 2020 uporabi koncept proračuna, ki temelji na rezultatih in ki vsako povečanje sredstev povezuje s povečanjem izložkov ali drugih rezultatov.
While arguing that the EU budget is a ‘performance budget’ with the possibility to take performance information into account during the budgetary process, the Commission stated in its replies that it did not consider the approach of explicitly linking resources allocated to outputs or results feasible or applicable for the EU budget. 
Namesto tega je trdila, da je proračun EU proračun, ki temelji na rezultatih in ki omogoča upoštevanje informacij o smotrnosti med proračunskim postopkom, ter v svojih odgovorih menila, da pristop, ki dodeljena sredstva izrecno povezuje z izložki ali rezultati, za proračun EU ni izvedljiv oz. se zanj ne more uporabljati.
19 22 OECD: Policy Brief March 2008, Performance Budgeting: A Users’ guide.23 OECD: Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Reforms in the European Union: The Common Agricultural Policy 2014-20. 
21 22 OECD, Policy Brief March 2008, Performance Budgeting: A Users’ guide.
CAP processes Better and quicker information needed to design cost-effective CAP instruments 35. 
Za pripravo stroškovno učinkovitih instrumentov SKP so potrebne boljše in ažurnejše informacije 35.
CAP instruments are not always designed on the basis of solid evidence. 
Instrumenti SKP niso vedno pripravljeni na podlagi trdnih dokazov.
This is partly due to the perennial problem of the EU policy cycle, where planning for a new programming period takes place before adequate, relevant data are available as regards spending and results from previous periods. 
Delni razlog je večni problem političnega cikla EU, pri katerem se načrtovanje novega programskega obdobja začne, preden so na voljo ustrezni in relevantni podatki o porabi in rezultatih iz prejšnjih obdobij.
A lack of sufficient data (on a variety of issues, such as biodiversity and soil, demand for knowledge and advice, or farm households’ living standards) and the consequently imprecise identification of actual needs (see paragraphs 20-23) lead to poor targeting of support. 
Pomanjkanje zadostnih podatkov (o različnih vprašanjih, kot so biotska raznovrstnost in tla, povpraševanje po znanju in svetovanju ali življenjska raven kmetijskih gospodinjstev) in posledično nenatančna opredelitev dejanskih potreb (glej odstavke 20–23) vodijo do slabega ciljnega usmerjanja podpore.
The Commission has recently launched spending reviews but we have not yet seen the methodology. 
Komisija je nedavno začela izvajati preglede porabe, vendar Sodišče še ni bilo seznanjeno z metodologijo.
Some CAP measures are subject to deadweight or displacement effects. 
Pri nekaterih ukrepih SKP se pojavljata učinek mrtvih izgub ali premestitveni učinek.
For certain eligible activities, where this risk is particularly high, financial instruments could be considered as an option. 
Finančni instrumenti bi lahko bili ena od možnosti za financiranje nekaterih upravičenih dejavnosti, pri katerih je tveganje še zlasti veliko.
The EU decided to fund climate-related action by incorporating, or “mainstreaming”, climate action within different EU funding instruments, including the CAP. 
EU se je odločila, da bo ukrepe v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami financirala tako, da jih bo vključila v različne instrumente financiranja EU, vključno z instrumenti SKP.
However, we found that, in the areas of agriculture and rural development, there has been no significant shift towards climate action and not all potential opportunities for financing climate-related action have been fully explored. 
Vendar Sodišče ugotavlja, da na področjih kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja ni bilo nobenega večjega premika v smeri podnebnih ukrepov, poleg tega pa niso bile povsem izkoriščene vse možnosti za financiranje ukrepov v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami.
Achieving consistency between the CAP and other EU policies and between different CAP instruments 38. 
Doseganje skladnosti med SKP in drugimi politikami EU ter med različnimi instrumenti SKP 38.
The CAP sometimes sends conflicting signals by supporting measures with incompatible impacts. 
SKP občasno pošilja nasprotujoče si signale, saj podpira ukrepe z nezdružljivimi učinki.
For example, the OECD argues23 that the potential impact of greening was largely offset by the impact of voluntary coupled support. 
OECD na primer trdi23, da je učinek prostovoljne vezane podpore v veliki meri izničil potencialni učinek zelene komponente.
Certain trade-offs are not clearly identified. 
Nekateri kompromisi niso jasno opredeljeni.
For example income support becomes capitalised in land prices, increasing barriers to entry for younger farmers. 
Dohodkovna podpora se na primer kapitalizira v cenah zemljišč, s čimer se povečajo ovire za vstop mladih kmetov.
Extra support is paid to younger farmers, with a significant deadweight effect, and a further impact on land values. 
Mladim kmetom se plača dodatna podpora, kar ima precejšen učinek mrtvih izgub in nadaljnji vpliv na vrednost zemljišč.
Currently, environmental and climate objectives are mainstreamed into the CAP through greening and cross-compliance. 
Okoljski in podnebni cilji so zdaj vključeni v SKP z zeleno komponento in navzkrižno skladnostjo.
However, greening obligations are generally undemanding and only apply to a minority of beneficiaries. 
Vendar so obveznosti glede zelene komponente na splošno nezahtevne in veljajo le za manjše število upravičencev.
While cross-compliance requirements apply to most CAP beneficiaries, the entitlement to CAP support does not depend on following them, and penalties for non-compliance for individual farmers, expressed as a percentage, tend to be low, although through broad application their impact can be significant. 
Medtem ko zahteve navzkrižne skladnosti veljajo za večino upravičencev do podpore v okviru SKP, upravičenost do te podpore ni odvisna od tega, ali se upoštevajo, kazni za njihovo neupoštevanje za posamezne kmete, izražene v odstotkih, pa so nizke, čeprav lahko imajo zaradi obsežne uporabe dokajšen vpliv.
We recommended to make access to any direct payments conditional upon meeting a set of basic environmental and climate requirements encompassing the current cross-compliance and greening rules. 
Sodišče je priporočilo, naj bo pogoj za dostop do vseh neposrednih plačil izpolnjevanje sklopa osnovnih okoljskih in podnebnih zahtev, ki zajemajo sedanja pravila glede navzkrižne skladnosti in zelene komponente.
OECD: Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Reforms in the European Union: The Common Agricultural Policy 2014-20. 
OECD, Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Reforms in the European Union: The Common Agricultural Policy 2014-20.
Better coordination with policy instruments outside the CAP is also needed. 
Potrebno je tudi boljše usklajevanje z instrumenti drugih politik.
There is an overlap in scope between the projects funded from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (CAP pillar 2) and those funded from other European Structural and Investment funds, mainly the European Regional Development Fund. 
Področje uporabe projektov, ki se financirajo iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (drugi steber SKP), in področje uporabe projektov, ki se financirajo iz drugih Evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov, zlasti Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj, se prekrivata.
For example investments in renewable energy can be supported by the EAFRD and several other funds. 
Naložbe v energijo iz obnovljivih virov se lahko na primer podpirajo s sredstvi EKSRP in več drugih skladov.
Simplification needed, but not at the cost of effectiveness 41. 
Potrebna je poenostavitev, vendar ne na račun uspešnosti 41.
One example of counter-productive complexity is rural development programmes, which often are several hundred pages long and provide prescriptive details of certain aspects of implementation, while remaining unspecific on the expected results. 
Eden od primerov zapletenosti, ki ima negativen učinek, so programi za razvoj podeželja, ki so pogosto dolgi več sto strani in vsebujejo normativne podrobnosti nekaterih vidikov izvajanja, medtem ko nimajo natančno določenih pričakovanih rezultatov.
Another example is the overlapping requirements of greening, the agri-environment-climate measure and, to a lesser extent, cross compliance. 
Drug primer je prekrivanje zahtev glede zelene komponente, kmetijsko-okoljsko-podnebnega ukrepa in v manjši meri navzkrižne skladnosti.
However, a certain degree of complexity may be needed for policy to be effective and efficient. 
Toda za uspešnost in učinkovitost politike je verjetno kljub vsemu potrebna neka stopnja zapletenosti.
Sufficient time must be allowed to roll out the next CAP reform 42. 
Zagotoviti je treba dovolj časa za uvedbo naslednje reforme SKP 42.
We have previously recommended that Commission should avoid overlaps of eligibility periods, aligning as far as possible the eligibility with the programme period and align the multiannual financial framework with the EU’s strategy periods. 
Sodišče je že priporočalo, naj Komisija prepreči prekrivanje obdobij upravičenosti in pri tem upravičenost čim bolj uskladi s programskim obdobjem, večletni finančni okvir pa z obdobji strategije EU.
Implementation of current rural development programmes started late, partly due to complex rules, and the time needed for the Commission to review and approve the voluminous programming documents. 
Izvajanje sedanjih programov za razvoj podeželja se je začelo pozno, delno zaradi zapletenih pravil ter časa, ki ga je Komisija potrebovala za pregled in odobritev obsežnih programskih dokumentov.
22 CAP outputs, outcomes and external actors Need for an effective performance system linking outputs, results, impacts and objectives 43. 
Izložki, izidi in zunanji dejavniki pri SKP Potreben je uspešen sistem zagotavljanja smotrnosti, ki povezuje izložke, rezultate, učinke in cilje 43.
The Commission currently has a complex and diverse performance reporting framework with numerous indicators. 
Komisija ima zapleten in raznolik okvir poročanja o smotrnosti s številnimi kazalniki.
We have recommended reducing the number of indicators so as to focus on those that best measure performance of the EU budget. 
Sodišče je priporočilo zmanjšanje števila kazalnikov, da bi se dosegla osredotočenost na kazalnike, ki najbolje merijo smotrnost proračuna EU.
The indicators often do not provide information that is relevant for assessing policy results and impacts. 
Kazalniki pogosto ne zagotavljajo informacij, ki so pomembne za oceno rezultatov in učinkov politike.