natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cohesion: The Commission should ensure, through its supervision, an effective functioning of the national management and control systems Subject to general provisions set out in the Structural funds Regulations, eligibility rules are specified at national and, in some cases, OP level. 
Kohezija: Komisija bi morala s svojim nadzorom zagotoviti uspešno delo­ vanje nacionalnih upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov Ob upoštevanju splošnih določb iz uredb o strukturnih skladih so pravila za upravičenost določena na nacionalni ravni in v nekaterih primerih na ravni operativnega programa.
The Commission has reviewed changes to such rules introduced by Member States in 2010. 
Komisija je pregledala spremembe teh pravil, ki so jih leta 2010 uvedle države članice.
The Commission considers that this recommendation has been implemented (see Commission reply to paragraph 4.50, Recommendation 2). 
Komisija meni, da je bilo to priporočilo izvedeno (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 4.50, priporočilo št. 2).
In January 2011 the Commission has published a Green Paper on the modernisation of EU public procurement policies (COM(2011) 15 final). 
Januarja 2011 je Komisija objavila Zeleno knjigo o moderni­ zaciji politike EU na področju javnih naročil (COM(2011) 15 konč.).
The Commission's evaluation of the EU public procurement legislative framework is expected to be finalised in 2011. 
Po pričakovanjih bo vrednotenje zakonodajnega okvira EU za javna naročila, ki ga izvaja Komisija, končano v letu 2011.
The 2010 AARs provide a detailed assessment per 2007-2013 OP, mainly based on the information contained in the Annual Control Reports established by the AAs and the audit work carried out by the Commission. 
Letna poročila o dejavnostih za leto 2010 vsebujejo podrobno oceno po operativnih programih za obdobje 2007–2013, in sicer v glavnem na podlagi informacij iz letnih poročil o kontroli, ki so jih pripravili revizijski organi, in revizijskega dela, ki ga je opravila Komisija.
ANNEX 4.4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOLLOW-UP TABLE FOR COHESION, ENERGY AND TRANSPORT See Commission reply to paragraph 4.50, Recommen­ dation 1. 
PRILOGA 4.4 TABELA O SPREMLJANJU IZVAJANJA PRIPOROČIL ZA KOHEZIJO, ENERGETIKO IN PROMET Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 4.50, priporočilo št.
EN 130 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 Year Court Recommendation Progress made Commission reply Court analysis 2008 (see the 2008 Annual Report, paragraphs 6.37(b) and (d); the 2009 Annual Report, paragraphs 4.37(a) and (b)) The Commission also introduced changes to the reporting by Member States of recoveries and withdrawals under the 2007-2013 programmes (Annex XI to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006). 
1. 4/2011 (1)). SL 4. 6. 10.
Cohesion: The Commission should encourage national authorities to rigorously apply the corrective mechanisms prior to certification of the expen­ diture to the Commission The Commission has increased its use of the provision in the 2007-2013 Structural Funds Regulations to interrupt or suspend payments when there is evidence to suggest significant deficiencies (or irregularities not yet corrected) in an audit report. 
Komisija bi morala nacionalne organe spodbujati k dosledni uporabi mehan­ izmov za izvajanje popravkov pred potrditvijo odhodkov Komisiji Komisija je v večji meri uporabljala določbo iz uredb o struk­ turnih skladih za obdobje 2007–2013 o prekinitvi ali začasni ustavitvi plačil, kadar so v revizijskem poročilu dokazi o bistvenih pomanjkljivostih (ali še neodpravljenih nepravilno­ stih).
This provides a further incentive to Member States to take all necessary corrective actions in a timely manner. 
To države članice dodatno spodbuja k pravočasnemu sprejemanju vseh potrebnih popravnih ukrepov.
The Commission considers that this recommendation has been implemented (see Commission reply to paragraph 4.50, Recommendation 2). 
Komisija meni, da je bilo to priporočilo izvedeno (glej Sodišče meni, da je priporočilo odgovor Komisije na odstavek 4.50, priporočilo št.
Detailed information on payment interruptions and suspensions is disclosed in the 2010 AAR for both DG REGIO and DG EMPL. 
2). izvedeno, če bo Komisija nada­ Podrobne informacije o prekinitvah in začasnih ustavitvah plačil so razkrite v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih GD REGIO in GD EMPL za leto 2010.
(1) Opinion No 4/2011 on the Commission’s Green Paper on the Modernisation of Public Procurement Policy (OJ C 195, 2.7.2011, p. 
(1) Mnenje št. 4 o Zeleni knjigi Komisije o modernizaciji politike na področju javnih naročil (UL C 195, 2.7.2011, str.
1). EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 131 Initial recommendations Overall assessment of actions taken Remaining or additional weaknesses Commission’s reply — The Commission should, where necessary, give appropriate guidance to Member States, so as to ensure that Community funding is efficient, effective and economic, and These recommendations have been mostly imple­ mented, albeit several years after the Court’s Report. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 131 Prvotno priporočilo Skupna ocena sprejetih ukrepov Preostale ali dodatne slabosti Odgovor Komisije — Komisija bi morala po potrebi državam članicam zagotoviti ustrezne smernice, da se zagotovijo učinkovitost, uspešnost in gospo­ darnost financiranja Skupnosti, Ta priporočila so bila večinoma izvedena, čeprav več let po objavi poročila Sodišča.
In June 2011, the Council adopted a Recommendation on ‘Policies to reduce early school leaving’ which aims to help policy makers in Member States understand the phenomenon and factors contributing to it. 
Svet je junija 2011 sprejel priporočilo o politikah za zmanj­ šanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja, ki naj bi oblikovalcem politike v državah članicah poma­ galo razumeti pojav in dejavnike, ki prispevajo k temu pojavu.
General guidance concerning the Structural Funds is also provided to Member States. 
Državam članicam so zagotovljene tudi splošne smernice za strukturne sklade.
The main corrective action aimed specifically at early school leaving, which was adopted by the Council only in 2011, has not yet produced significant effect. 
Glavni popravni ukrep, usmerjen izrecno v prezgodnjo opustitev izobraževanja, ki ga je Svet sprejel šele leta 2011, še ni prinesel bistvenih učinkov.
In the context of the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission launched in early 2011 an action plan to reduce early school leaving including a proposal for a Council Recommendation (approved in June 2011) on policies against early school leaving. 
Komisija je v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 na začetku leta 2011 začela izvajati akcijski načrt za zmanjšanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja, vključno s predlogom za priporočilo Sveta (potrjenim junija 2011) o politikah za zmanjšanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja.
This recommen­ dation contains guidelines to help Member States develop comprehensive and evidence-based policies to reduce early school leaving. 
To priporo­ čilo vsebuje smernice, na katere se bodo lahko države oprle pri razvoju celovitih in z dejstvi podprtih politik za zmanjšanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja.
The work on the action plan started effectively already in 2006 with estab­ lishing the cluster on ‘Access and Social Inclusion in Lifelong Learning’ and with defining the work programme of this cluster. 
Prizade­ vanja za oblikovanje akcijskega načrta so se dejansko začela že leta 2006 z ustanovitvijo skupine strokov­ njakov za dostop in družbeno vključenost v okviru vseži­ vljenjskega učenja ter z opredelitvijo delovnega programa te skupine.
The action plan as adopted by the Commission in 2011 is based on the cluster's work and several comparative studies on early school leaving in Europe (conducted between 2006 and 2009). — Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, should establish or strengthen existing procedures within co-financed measures for project selection and identifying and targeting those most at risk of leaving school prematurely. — The Commission should verify that Member States’ management systems adhere to the principles of economy, efficiency and effec­ tiveness in conformity with Community regu­ lation. 
Akcijski načrt, ki ga je Komisija sprejela leta 2011, temelji na delu te skupine ter več primerjalnih študijah o zgodnji opustitvi izobraževanja v Evropi (izve­ denih med letoma 2006 in 2009). — države članice pa bi morale v sodelovanju s Komisijo vzpostaviti ali okrepiti obstoječe postopke znotraj sofinanciranih ukrepov za izbiro projektov ter za opredelitev tistih projektov, pri katerih je tveganje za zgodnjo opustitev izobraževanja največje, in usmeritev vanje. — Komisija bi morala preveriti, ali so upravljavski sistemi držav članic skladni z načeli učinkovi­ tosti, uspešnosti in gospodarnosti v skladu z uredbami Skupnosti.
This recommendation has not yet been imple­ mented. 
To priporočilo še ni izvedeno.
For the next programming period, the Commission expects that the added value of the EU financing will also be subject to analysis in its audits (1). 
Komisija pričakuje, da bo v naslednjem programskem obdobju tudi dodana vrednost financiranja EU predmet analize pri njenih revizijah (1).
The Commission has not yet expanded the scope of its audit activity to also analyse the added value of EU financing. 
Komisija še ni razširila obsega svoje revizijske dejavnosti, da bi analizirala tudi dodano vrednost financiranja EU.
Within the preparation of the draft regulations for the next programming period, it is envisaged to put a greater emphasis on the output, funding mechanisms being, to a large extent, aimed at rewarding output/ outcome rather than input. 
V okviru pripravljanja osnutkov uredb za naslednje programsko obdobje je predviden večji poudarek na izložkih, saj so mehanizmi za financiranje v veliki meri usmerjeni v priznavanje izložkov/izidov in ne vložkov.
A part of the Commission’s audit resources would therefore need to be re-oriented towards performance audit instead of the current compliance/financial audits. — Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, should carry out an analysis of expected economic benefits, which should include a documented and reasoned justifi­ cation for the level of funding being allocated and the areas of activities being prioritised, and This recommendation has been implemented only insofar as the Commission has made a statement of principle. 
Del revizijskih virov Komisije bo tako treba preusmeriti s sedanjih revizij skladnosti / finančnih revizij na revizije uspešnosti. — Države članice bi morale v sodelovanju s Komisijo opraviti analizo pričakovanih gospo­ darskih koristi, ki mora vsebovati dokumenti­ rano in pojasnjeno utemeljitev za stopnjo dodeljenega financiranja in za prednostno obravnavo področij in dejavnosti, in Edini ukrep za izvedbo tega priporočila je bila načelna izjava, ki jo je dala Komisija.
The general provisions on programming and ex-ante evaluation for 2007-2013 address in principle the Court’s recommen­ dation. 
Splošne določbe o programiranju in predhodnem vredno­ tenju za obdobje 2007–2013 se načeloma nana­ šajo na priporočila Sodišča.
The issue has been also addressed in the context of the recent Budget review. 
Vprašanje je bilo obravnavano tudi v kontekstu nedavnega pregleda proračuna.
However, a clear link between the specific priorities and objectives regarding early school leaving and the level of funding allocated is still not present in the Operational Programmes. 
Vendar operativni programi še vedno ne vsebujejo jasne povezave med specifičnimi prednostnimi nalogami in cilji v zvezi z zgodnjo opustitvijo izobraževanja in stopnjo dodeljenega financiranja.
The issue remains relevant for the next financial framework. 
Vprašanje ostaja relevantno za naslednji finančni okvir.
ESF operational programmes contain a clear link between the retained priorities, the objectives to be achieved, which are also translated into quantified targets at priority axis level, as foreseen in the regulatory framework and the level of funding required for achieving the objectives. — make sure that the allocation is based on objective and relevant criteria so as to maximise the potential impact of the funds. 
Operativni programi ESS vsebujejo očitno povezavo med ohranjenimi prednostnimi nalogami, cilji, ki jih je treba doseči in so preneseni tudi v količinsko opredeljene cilje na ravni prednostne osi, kakor je določeno v regula­ tivnem okviru, ter ravnjo financiranja, ki je potrebna za dosego ciljev. — dodeljevanje zagotoviti na podlagi objektivnih in ustreznih meril, da se omogoči čim večji morebitni učinek teh sredstev.
ANNEX 4.5a FOLLOW-UP OF SPECIAL REPORT No 1/2006: ANALYSIS OF ACTIONS TAKEN TO ADDRESS THE COURT’S RECOMMENDATIONS 
PRILOGA 4.5a SPREMLJANJE POPRAVNIH UČINKOV POSEBNEGA POROČILA št.
EN 132 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 Initial recommendations Overall assessment of actions taken Remaining or additional weaknesses Commission’s reply — Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, should establish reasonable annual targets for the reduction of early school leaving in order to meet the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy. 
SL 132 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 Prvotno priporočilo — Države članice bi morale v sodelovanju s Skupna ocena sprejetih ukrepov Preostale ali dodatne slabosti Odgovor Komisije Komisijo določiti razumne letne cilje za zmanjšanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja, da bi dosegli cilje lizbonske strategije.
In the context of the Europe 2020 strategy, four 4 after the publication of the Special Report, Member States agreed to set national targets, taking into account their starting position and national circumstances. 
Štiri leta po objavi posebnega poročila so se države članice v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 dogovo­ rile, da določijo nacionalne cilje ob upoštevanju svojih izhodiščnih stanj in nacionalnih razmer.
One Member State has not defined its specific target. 
Ena država članica ni določila svojih specifičnih ciljev.
The preparation of the programming period post-2013 was the first opportunity for the Commission to implement this recommendation. 
Priprave na programsko obdobje po letu 2013 so bile za Komisijo prva priložnost za izvedbo tega priporočila.
Within the 2020 Strategy, the definition of national targets is the product of a dialogue with the European Commission in order to check consistency with EU headline targets. 
V okviru strategije Evropa 2020 je opredelitev nacio­ nalnih ciljev rezultat dialoga z Evropsko komisijo z namenom preverjanja skladnosti z glavnimi cilji EU.
Each country sets its national targets in its national reform programme which is due in April each year. 
Vsaka država opredeli svoje nacionalne cilje v nacio­ nalnem programu reform, ki ga mora pripraviti do aprila vsako leto.
All Member States, except the UK, have set national targets on early school leaving in the 2011 National Reform Programmes submitted to the Commission in April/May 2011). — Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, should encourage the exchange of information and best practice between all local and national organisations responsible for tackling early school leaving, where permitted by law. 
Vse države članice razen Združenega kraljestva so svoje nacionalne cilje glede zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja določile v nacionalnih programih reform iz leta 2011, ki so jih Komisiji predložile aprila/ maja 2011. — Države članice bi morale v sodelovanju s Komisijo, kadar je to zakonsko dovoljeno, spodbujati izmenjavo podatkov in najboljših praks med vsemi lokalnimi in nacionalnimi organizacijami, ki so odgovorne za reševanje problema zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja.
This recommendation has been implemented. 
To priporočilo je bilo izvedeno.
Under the Open Method of Coordination, a group of experts from Member States specialising in ‘Access and Social Inclusion in Education’ was set up within the work programme ‘Education and Training 2010’, adopted in 2003. 
V okviru odprte metode koordinacije je bila v okviru delovnega programa „Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2010“, sprejetega leta 2003, ustanovljena skupina stro­ kovnjakov iz držav članic, specializiranih za dostop in socialno vključenost v izobraževanju.
Since 2006, the group conducted peer-learning activities in different Member States. 
Skupina je od leta 2006 izvajala dejavnosti vzajemnega učenja v različnih državah članicah.
The Commission has recently proposed the setting-up of a new thematic working group on early school leaving. 
Komisija je pred kratkim predlagala ustanovitev nove tematske delovne skupine za zgodnjo opustitev izobraževanja.
The new thematic group on the topic of early school leaving has yet to be set up. 
Nova tematska skupina za zgodnjo opustitev izobraževanja še ni ustanovljena.
Under the Open Method of Coordination, a ‘Cluster’ of experts from Member States specialising in ‘Access and Social Inclusion in Education’ was set up within the work programme Education and Training 2010, adopted by the Council in 2003. 
Na podlagi odprte metode usklajevanja je bila v okviru delovnega programa Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2010, ki ga je Svet sprejel leta 2003, ustanovljena skupina strokovnjakov za dostop in družbeno vključenost na področju izobraževanja iz držav članic.
The Commission will set up a European-level expert group (in the framework of EU 2020). 
Komisija bo oblikovala skupino strokovnjakov na evropski ravni (v okviru strategije Evropa 2020).
This group will continue the work of the former cluster on ‘Access and Social Inclusion in Lifelong Learning’, focussing on early school leaving and further developing the existing guidance documents. — Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, should actively promote the innovative use of ESF funding in tackling early school leaving. 
Ta skupina bo nadalje­ vala delo skupine za dostop in družbeno vključenost v okviru vseživljenjskega učenja ter se osredotočila na zgodnjo opustitev izobraževanja in dodatno razvijala obstoječe smernice na tem področju. — Države članice bi morale v sodelovanju s Komisijo pri preprečevanju zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja aktivno pospeševati inovativno uporabo financiranja iz ESS.
Since the publication of the Special Report, Member States have organised conferences on the integration of young people into the labour market, including early school leaving, where new models have been presented. 
Države članice so od objave posebnega poročila organizirale konfe­ rence o vključevanju mladih na trg delovne sile in zgodnji opustitvi izobraževanja, na katerih so predstavile nove modele.
The Commission should continue to encourage actions promoting innovative use of ESF. 
Komisija bi morala še naprej spodbujati dejav­ nosti za pospeševanje inovativne uporabe ESS.
The Commission continues its activities to promote the innovative use of ESF. 
Komisija še naprej izvaja svoje dejavnosti za spodbujanje inovativne uporabe ESS.
(1) This orientation is reflected in the Communication of the Commission of 19 October 2010 on the EU Budget review (COM(2010) 700 final) and in the 5th report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. 
(1) Ta usmeritev se kaže v Sporočilu o pregledu proračuna EU (COM(2010) 700) in v petem poročilu o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji.
For both DGs, there has been a shift from an approach analysing Member States to one based on key thematic areas in order to better focus on strategic issues in a Union of 27 Member States. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 133 Priporočilo 1 Nujno je treba izvesti ponovno ocenjevanje obsega, Oba generalna direktorata sta začela pristop analize po državah nadomeščati s pristopom po ključnih tematskih področjih, da bi se v Uniji s 27 državami članicami bolje osredotočila na stra­ teška vprašanja.
For DG EMPL, analysis is summarised via key evaluation questions. 
Za GD EMPL je analiza povzeta prek ključnih vprašanj pri vrednotenjih.
DG REGIO’s analysis should be summarised according to issues of strategic interest to stake­ holders. 
Analiza GD REGIO bi morala biti povzeta v skladu z vprašanji, ki so v strateškem interesu zainteresiranih strani.
Energy should be included as a theme. 
Energetika bi morala biti vključena kot tema.
The Europe 2020 goals should be taken into account. 
Treba bi bilo upoštevati cilje strategije Evropa 2020.
Recommendation 2 To improve the evaluation process, better quality control procedures need to be introduced and effectively applied by the Commission (...). 
Priporočilo 2 Za izboljšanje procesa vrednotenja mora Komisija uvesti in učinkovito uporabljati boljše postopke za kontrolo kakovosti [...].
Such procedures should ensure: (a) that relevant and reliable data is collected regularly and is available at each stage of the evaluation process; A series of measures targeted to entities carrying out ex post were taken. 
Takšni postopki bi morali zagotoviti, da: (a) se redno zbirajo relevantni in zanesljivi podatki ter da so ti na voljo v vsaki fazi procesa vred­ notenja; Sprejeta je bila vrsta ukrepov, namenjenih subjektom, ki izvajajo naknadna vrednotenja.
Further efforts are required to improve the avail­ ability, relevance and reliability of information concerning project performance. (a) DG REGIO agrees with the assessment. 
Potrebna so dodatna prizadevanja za izboljšanje razpoložljivosti, relevantnosti in zanesljivosti informacij o uspešnosti projektov. (a) GD REGIO se strinja z oceno.
Improvements on data have already been imple­ mented in the programming period 2007-2013: Member States are required to provide participants data along a list of harmonised characteristics (e.g. on employment status, disadvantaged, education). (b) that terms of reference are adequate and provide for the application of appropriate methodologies by the contractors; Both DGs included key evaluation considerations in the 2000-2006 Terms of Reference. (c) that adequate resources and time are allocated to the evaluation processes; Appropriate resources were allocated by both DGs to ex-post evaluation. (d) that there are appropriate monitoring and supervision by the Commission so as to ensure the overall quality of the process. 
Izboljšave glede podatkov so bile izvedene že v programskem obdobju 2007–2013: države članice morajo zagotoviti podatke o udeležencih ter sezname usklajenih značil­ nosti (npr. o zaposlitvenem statusu, prikrajšanih osebah, izobrazbi). (b) so projektne naloge ustrezne ter zagotavljajo, da izvajalci uporabljajo primerne metodologije; Oba generalna direktorata sta v projektne naloge za obdobje 2000–2006 vključila ključne pomi­ sleke pri vrednotenju. (c) so procesom vrednotenja dodeljeni ustrezni viri in čas; Oba generalna direktorata sta dodelila ustrezne vire za naknadno vrednotenje. (d) Komisija izvaja primerno spremljanje in nadzor ter tako zagotovi splošno kakovost procesa.
Both DGs improved quality control by issuing guidance notes, allocating more resources, setting up panels of independent experts, and holding regular steering group meetings. 
Oba generalna direktorata sta izboljšala kontrolo kakovosti z izdajanjem navodil, dodelitvijo več virov, ustanavljanjem skupin neodvisnih strokov­ njakov in rednimi sestanki usmerjevalne skupine.
ANNEX 4.5b FOLLOW-UP OF SPECIAL REPORT No 10/2006: ANALYSIS OF ACTIONS TAKEN TO ADDRESS THE COURT’S RECOMMENDATIONS For a future ex-post evaluation the most important features of the current programming period will be taken into account. 
PRILOGA 4.5b SPREMLJANJE POPRAVNIH UČINKOV POSEBNEGA POROČILA ŠT. 10/2006: ANALIZA UKREPOV, SPREJETIH ZA OBRAVNAVANJE PRIPOROČIL SODIŠČA Prvotno priporočilo (odstavki 119–123 posebnega poročila) Skupna ocena sprejetih ukrepov (naknadna vrednotenja za obdobje 2000–2006) Preostale ali dodatne slabosti (naslednja naknadna vrednotenja za obdobje 2007–2013) Odgovor Komisije Pri prihodnjem naknadnem vrednotenju se bodo upošte­ vale najpomembnejše značilnosti sedanjega program­ skega obdobja.
DG REGIO recalls that the Europe 2020 strategy was adopted only in 2010, several years after the current programmes had been approved by the Commission. 
GD REGIO opozarja, da je bila strate­ gija Evropa 2020 sprejeta šele leta 2010, torej več let po tem, ko je Komisija potrdila sedanje programe.
The issue of renewable energy has been addressed in a recent work undertaken by DG REGIO. 
Vpra­ šanje obnovljivih virov energije je bilo obravnavano v okviru nedavnega dela GD REGIO.