natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, it is the actual implementation of planned climate funding contributions which should be assessed, while avoiding disproportionate administrative costs. 
Zato bi bilo treba ocenjevati dejansko izvajanje načrtovanih prispevkov k financiranju za podnebne cilje in se izogibati nesorazmernim upravnim stroškom.
The Commission has not yet developed a procedure for doing so (paragraph 46). 
Komisija še ni pripravila postopka za to (odstavek 46).
Monitoring the actual financial implementation of the 20 % target would, however, not provide any information on results achieved by the climate action spending. 
Vendar s spremljanjem dejanskega finančnega izvajanja 20-odstotnega cilja ne bi dobili informacij o rezultatih, doseženih s porabo za podnebne ukrepe.
We found that information on what funds plan to achieve, or have achieved in terms of results such as greenhouse gas reductions, is only available for parts of the budget and lacks comparability (paragraph 47). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so informacije o tem, katere rezultate skladi nameravajo doseči oziroma so jih že dosegli, kot je zmanjšanje toplogrednih plinov, na voljo le za nekatere dele proračuna in niso primerljive (odstavek 47).
Recommendation 6 — Develop indicators monitoring actual spending on climate action and related results The Commission should: (a) in cooperation with the Member States, in the area of shared management, develop a harmonised and proportionate system for monitoring the actual implementation of climate action; (b) in line with its ‘budget for results’ initiative, establish climate-related results indicators in all areas that contribute towards the achievement of the target, in particular to assess greenhouse gas emissions and reductions brought about through EU-funded measures; (c) facilitate the exchange of good practice on climate-related result indicators between Member States. 
Priporočilo 6 – Razvoj kazalnikov za spremljanje dejanske porabe za podnebne ukrepe in s tem povezanih rezultatov Komisija naj: (a) v sodelovanju z državami članicami na področju deljenega upravljanja razvije usklajen in sorazmeren sistem za spremljanje dejanskega izvajanja podnebnih ukrepov; (b) v skladu s svojo pobudo proračuna, usmerjenega v rezultate, določi kazalnike rezultatov v zvezi s podnebnimi cilji na vseh področjih, ki prispevajo k doseganju cilja, zlasti za ocenjevanje emisij toplogrednih plinov in njihovega zmanjšanja zaradi ukrepov, ki jih financira EU; (c) olajšati izmenjavo dobrih praks v zvezi s kazalniki rezultatov v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami med državami članicami.
Target implementation date: By December 2018. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: december 2018.
Conclusions and recommendations 57 More and better-focused climate action funding in some European Structural and Investment Funds, but largely business as usual in others 104 Compared with 2007-2013, climate-related expenditure in 2014-2020 across all ERDF and CF programmes, including the European Territorial Cooperation framework, is planned to increase from 32.4 billion euros to 54.7 billion euros. 
Zaključki in priporočila 57 Več bolje usmerjenega financiranja podnebnih ukrepov v nekaterih evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladih, v drugih pa se ni skoraj nič spremenilo 104 Odhodki za podnebne cilje v obdobju 2014–2020 naj bi se v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007–2013 v vseh programih ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada, vključno z okvirom za evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje, povečali z 32,4 milijarde EUR na 54,7 milijarde EUR.
In addition to the financial increase, we identified a better focus on climate action and good practices in certain areas, such as in the programmes’ management process or in the type of funded investments (paragraphs 69 and 70). 
Poleg povečanja finančnih sredstev je Sodišče ugotovilo večjo osredotočenost na podnebne ukrepe in dobre prakse na nekaterih področjih, kot sta upravljavski proces programov ali vrsta financiranih naložb (glej odstavka 69 in 70).
105 However, in the audited programmes in Germany and Romania, we found that the Commission had not pushed strongly during programming negotiations significantly to increase the amount of climate action taken in the research and development or business development fields. 
105 Sodišče je v revidiranih programih v Nemčiji in Romuniji ugotovilo, da si Komisija med pogajanji o načrtovanju programov ni dovolj prizadevala za bistveno povečanje zneska za podnebne ukrepe na področju raziskav in razvoja ter poslovnega razvoj.
This means that not all the potential opportunities for financing climate-related action were fully explored (paragraph 75). 
To pomeni, da vse potencialne možnosti za financiranje ukrepov v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami niso bile v celoti izkoriščene (odstavek 75).
106 Similarly, the European Social Fund’s potential contribution to climate action could be increased in light of the increasing demand for green jobs in the economy. 
106 Prav tako bi bilo mogoče povečati mogoče prispevke Evropskega socialnega sklada k podnebnim ukrepom zaradi vse večjega povpraševanja po zelenih delovnih mestih v gospodarstvu.
We found that the ESF operational programmes allocated a very low share of 1.4 % of 83 billion euros to climate action. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je v operativnih programih ESS za podnebne ukrepe dodeljen zelo majhen delež, in sicer 1,4 % od 83 milijard EUR.
The Commission did not systematically check whether the programmes would target the demand for green jobs or support the transition to a low-carbon economy (paragraphs 76 to 79). 
Komisija ni sistematično preverjala, ali so programi usmerjeni v povpraševanje po zelenih delovnih mestih in ali podpirajo prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo (odstavki 76 do 79).
107 Despite some good practices emerging, there has been no significant shift towards climate action in agricultural, rural development or fisheries policies. 
107 Čeprav se je pojavilo nekaj novih dobrih praks, v kmetijski politiki, politiki razvoja podeželja in ribiški politiki ni bilo bistvenega premika v smeri podnebnih ukrepov.
Conclusions and recommendations 58 108 The introduction of a Green Payment does not guarantee a significant change of the contribution of direct payments to climate. 
Zaključki in priporočila 58 108 Uvedba plačila za zeleno komponento ne zagotavlja bistvene spremembe v prispevku neposrednih plačil k podnebnim ciljem.
This new scheme, while having a certain climate action impact, rests in practise largely on already existing agricultural practices (paragraphs 81 and 83). 
Nova shema sicer ima nek učinek na podnebne ukrepe, vendar v praksi temelji predvsem na obstoječih kmetijskih praksah (odstavki 81 do 83).
Across the three rural development programmes audited, we saw no real upward or downward shift in investments. 
Sodišče v treh revidiranih programih razvoja podeželja ni zaznalo konkretne rasti ne upadanja naložb.
Regarding the better-targeting of climate action, we found no significant change in the key features of the management process, such as the requirements or eligibility and selection criteria. 
V zvezi z boljšo usmerjenostjo podnebnih ukrepov ni ugotovilo pomembnih sprememb v ključnih elementih upravljavskega procesa, kot so zahteve ali merila za upravičenost in izbor.
The design of some less material measures had, however, been modified to make them more climate-related. 
Spremenila pa se je zasnova nekaterih manj pomembnih ukrepov, ki so postali bolj povezani s podnebnimi cilji.
We also found several examples of emerging good practice contributing directly to tackling climate change (paragraphs 84 to 87). 
Ugotovilo je tudi več primerov novih dobrih praks, ki neposredno prispevajo k boju proti podnebnim spremembam (odstavki 84 do 87).
109 There has been only a very limited increased focus on climate action in the maritime and fisheries fund. 
109 V skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo se je usmerjenost v podnebne ukrepe le malo povečala.
Direct and clear references to climate change objectives, both mitigation and adaption, are still rare. 
Neposredno in jasno navajanje ciljev na področju blažitve podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanja nanje je še vedno redkost.
As a result, the maritime and fisheries fund has not widened the scope of its contribution to climate action (paragraphs 88 to 90). 
Zato sklad za pomorstvo in ribištvo ni razširil svojega prispevka k podnebnim ukrepom (odstavki 88 do 90).
Recommendation 7 — Explore all potential opportunities and ensure a real shift towards climate action The Commission should: (a) identify those areas with underutilised potential for climate action, such as the European Social Fund, and develop action plans for increasing the climate action contribution of these areas; (b) The Commission and Member States should increase the mainstreaming of climate action in agriculture, rural development and fisheries, for example, by developing new, or retargeting existing, measures tackling climate change. 
Priporočilo 7 – Preučitev vseh mogočih priložnosti in zagotavljanje resničnega premika v smeri podnebnih ukrepov Komisija naj: (a) opredeli področja s premalo izkoriščenim potencialom za podnebne ukrepe, kot je Evropski socialni sklad, in razvije akcijske načrte za povečanje prispevka teh področij k podnebnim ukrepom; (b) Komisija in države članice naj povečajo vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov v kmetijstvo, razvoj podeželja in ribištvo, na primer z razvijanjem novih ukrepov za boj proti podnebnim spremembam ali boljšim usmerjanjem obstoječih.
Conclusions and recommendations 59 This report was adopted by Chamber I, headed by Mr Phil WYNN OWEN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 26 October 2016. 
Zaključki in priporočila 59 To poročilo je sprejel senat I, ki ga vodi član Evropskega računskega sodišča Phil WYNN OWEN, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 26. oktobra 2016.
Annex 60 Matrix of coefficients used by the ECA in the field of the rural development policy The proposed matrix based on the audit visits in the Member States, and also adapted from the preparatory study commissioned by the Commission, remedies the lack of differentiation of EU climate coefficient by measure. 
Priloga 60 Matrika koeficientov, ki jih je Računsko sodišče uporabilo na področju politike razvoja podeželja Predlagana matrika, ki temelji na revizijskih obiskih v državah članicah in je prilagojena glede na pripravljalno študijo, ki jo je naročila Komisija, odpravlja pomanjkanje razlikovanja med podnebnimi koeficienti EU glede na ukrep.
On the basis of the case studies examined in the Member States, a literature review1, an analysis of Commission internal notes and the application of international standards2, we established, as a first step, an updated matrix of climate coefficients which takes into account the measures and their policy objectives represented by the focus areas (see below). 
Sodišče je na podlagi študij primera, ki jih je preučilo v državah članicah, pregleda literature1, analize internih zapiskov Komisije in uporabe mednarodnih standardov2 najprej določilo posodobljeno matriko podnebnih koeficientov, ki upošteva ukrepe in z njimi povezane cilje politik, predstavljene po prednostnih področjih (glej spodaj). Potem je določilo zneske EKSRP po ukrepih in prednostnih področjih.
The data are available from the Commission to do so. 
Podatki za to so na voljo pri Komisiji.
The only case where an assumption had to be made was with union priority 43. 
Predvidevanje je bilo potrebno samo v primeru prednostne naloge Unije št. 43.
Finally, we applied the climate coefficients in the matrix below to the corresponding EAFRD amounts. 
Nazadnje je podnebne koeficiente iz spodnje matrike uporabilo za ustrezne zneske EKSRP.
1 The matrix has been developed in particular on the basis of the preparatory study commissioned by the Commission, ‘Tracking system for climate expenditure in the post-2013 EU budget’ — Detailed CAP assessment, Table 5.4 (pp. 25-30). 
1 Matrika je bila razvita zlasti na podlagi pripravljalne študije, ki jo je naročila Komisija, z naslovom Tracking system for climate expenditure in the post-2013 EU budget (Sistem spremljanja odhodkov za podnebne cilje v proračunu EU po letu 2013) – Podrobna analiza SKP, tabela 5.4 (str. 25–30).
2 Rio markers of the OECD and tracking principles developed by the Multilateral Development Banks like the World Bank. 
2 Kazalniki OECD iz Ria in načela spremljanja, ki so jih razvile multilateralne razvojne banke, kot je Svetovna banka.
3 Union priority 4 is programmed as a ‘block’ according to the Commission ‘guidelines for strategic programming’, i.e. there is no allocation of EAFRD expenditure to individual focus areas. 
3 Prednostna naloga Unije št. 4 je v skladu s smernicami Komisije za strateško načrtovanje programov predvidena kot sklop, torej odhodki EKSRP niso dodeljeni posameznim prednostnim področjem.
Therefore, we divided the planned EAFRD expenditure under this priority by three and allocated an equal EAFRD amount to each of the three focus areas under union priority 4: focus areas 4A (restoring, preserving and enhancing biodiversity), 4B (improving water management, including fertiliser and pesticide management) and 4C (preventing soil erosion and improving soil management). 
Zato smo načrtovane odhodke EKSRP v okviru te prednostne naloge delili s tri in vsakemu izmed prednostnih področij prednostne naloge Unije št. 4 dodelili enak znesek EKSRP: prednostno področje 4A (obnova, ohranjanje in izboljševanje biotske raznovrstnosti), 4B (izboljšanje upravljanja voda, vključno z ravnanjem z gnojili in pesticidi) in 4C (preprečevanje erozije tal in izboljšanje upravljanja tal).
Reply of the 62 Commission Executive summary I The Commission is fully committed to fighting climate change. 
Odgovori Komisije 62 Povzetek I Komisija se v celoti zavzema za boj proti podnebnim spremembam.
The EU approach to transitioning to low carbon and climate resilient economy is driven through policy measures, which seek to also shift investment patterns. 
Pristop EU glede prehoda na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo, odporno na podnebne spremembe, temelji na političnih ukrepih, ki poskušajo spremeniti tudi naložbene vzorce.
Public spending from the EU and Member States’ national budgets complements and seeks to speed up this transition. 
Javna poraba iz proračuna EU in nacionalnih proračunov držav članic dopolnjuje ta prehod in si ga prizadeva pospešiti.
With the proposal to mainstream climate across the EU budget1 and to increase climate spending to 20 % of the budget, the Commission aimed to make the EU budget a pioneer in fostering mainstreaming. 
S predlogom za vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov v celoten proračun EU1 in za povečanje porabe za podnebne ukrepe do 20 % proračuna je Komisija želela, da bi proračun EU utiral pot pri spodbujanju vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov.
The European Council and the European Parliament supported the mainstreaming approach2, and confirmed that the 20 % is an appropriate level of support. 
Evropski svet in Evropski parlament sta podprla pristop k vključevanju2 in potrdila, da je 20 % ustrezna raven podpore.
II The European Council explicitly confirmed the Commission’s approach to mainstream climate across the budget as the main objective, supported by the political objective of making at least 20 % of EU spending in the current MFF climate relevant. 
II Evropski svet je izrecno potrdil pristop Komisije k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov v proračun kot glavni cilj, ki ga podpira politični cilj, da je vsaj 20 % porabe EU v sedanjem večletnem finančnem okviru povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi.
In addition to mainstreaming, the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) also set out a dedicated programme for addressing climate action. 
Poleg vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov večletni finančni okvir določa tudi poseben program za podnebne ukrepe.
IV The Commission welcomes the Court’s recognition of the ambitious work undertaken and the need to continue the efforts to further improve mainstreaming. 
IV Komisija izraža zadovoljstvo ob ugotovitvi Sodišča, da poteka ambiciozno delo in da je treba vključevanje še izboljšati.
At the same time, the Commission considers that significant progress has been made both in including climate considerations in programme development and in developing the unique quantified mainstreaming approach, which now provides a transparent baseline. 
Hkrati Komisija meni, da je bil dosežen pomemben napredek tako z vključevanjem podnebnih vprašanj v razvoj programov kot tudi z razvojem edinstvenega količinsko opredeljenega pristopa k vključevanju, ki zdaj zagotavlja pregledno osnovo.
The Commission notes, however, that the potential individual contribution of each of the funds varies according to its primary missions, and therefore, it is inevitable that the systems used to programme and to monitor the contribution differ from one fund to another. 
Vendar Komisija ugotavlja, da se lahko posamičen prispevek vsakega sklada razlikuje glede na njegovo osnovno poslanstvo, zato je neizogibno, da se uporabljeni sistemi za načrtovanje in spremljanje prispevka razlikujejo od enega sklada na drugega.
Also, the reform of the common agricultural policy (CAP) has led to a significant increase in the financing of climate action as compared to the 2007-2013 period. 
Poleg tega je reforma skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) privedla do znatnega povečanja financiranja podnebnih ukrepov v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007–2013.
The Commission considers that there is a significant shift towards more climate action. 
Komisija meni, da obstaja pomemben premik k povečanju obsega podnebnih ukrepov.
V The Commission assessed progress towards the 20 % target in the MFF Mid Term Review (MTR), published on 14 September 2016. 
V Komisija ocenjuje napredek pri doseganju cilja 20 % v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira (MTR), objavljenem 14. septembra 2016.
The latest data, presented in the Staff Working Document (2016) 299 accompanying the Mid-term Review of the Multiannual Financial Framework (COM(2016) 603) show that over the 2014-2020 period, a total of slightly above EUR 200 billion of climate-related spending will be reached. 
Najnovejši podatki, predstavljeni v delovnem dokumentu služb Komisije (SWD(2016)299), priloženem vmesnemu pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira (COM(2016) 603), kažejo, da bo v obdobju 2014–2020 skupna poraba za podnebne ukrepe dosegla nekaj več kot 200 milijard EUR.
1 See COM(2011) 500 final, Part I, section 6.1.4 http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/biblio/documents/fin_fwk1420/MFF_COM-2011-500_Part_I_en.pdf 2 See 2013-02-07 European Council Conclusions and the 2013-03-13 European Parliament resolution on the new MFF (P7_TA(2013)0078). 
1 Glej COM(2011) 500 final, del I, oddelek 6.1.4 (http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/biblio/documents/fin_fwk1420/ MFF_COM-2011-500_Part_I_en.pdf). 2 Glej sklepe Evropskega sveta z dne 7. 2.
Reply of the Commission 63 VI The Commission takes note of the Court’s simulations. 
Odgovori Komisije 63 VI Komisija je seznanjena s simulacijami Sodišča.
However, the Commission has established an innovative and detailed tracking methodology built on the OECD’s Rio markers. 
Vendar je Komisija vzpostavila inovativno in podrobno metodologijo spremljanja, ki temelji na metodologiji kazalnikov OECD iz Ria.
Nevertheless, the Commission recognises the need to continue efforts to increase climate relevance across EU programmes, including those mentioned by the Court. 
Kljub temu Komisija priznava, da si je treba še naprej prizadevati za povečanje pomena podnebnih ukrepov v programih EU, vključno s tistimi, ki jih je omenilo Sodišče.
The method used by the Commission has been prepared in a transparent and coordinated manner. 
Metoda, ki jo uporablja Komisija, je bila pripravljena na pregleden in usklajen način.
The EU approach to assessing levels of climate finance in agriculture and rural development is sound. 
Pristop EU k ocenjevanju ravni financiranja podnebnih ukrepov v kmetijstvu in razvoju podeželja je utemeljen.
Likewise, for green direct payments the calculation fairly reflects the climate-relatedness of the three farming practices. 
Prav tako izračun neposrednih plačil za zeleno komponento pravično odraža povezanost treh kmetijskih praks s podnebnimi spremembami.
Also, for non-greening direct payments, the climate impact of 8 % of non-greening direct payments is not overestimated if we look at the benefits for the climate of cross compliance and direct payments. 
Kar pa zadeva neposredna plačila za nezeleno komponento, podnebni vpliv neposrednih plačil za nezeleno komponento v višini 8 % ni precenjen, če upoštevamo koristi navzkrižne skladnosti in neposrednih plačil za podnebje.
VII The Commission recognises that the innovative approach to tracking climate spending and its implementation in the EU budget could be further improved, including in respect of increasing granularity with regard to mitigation and adaptation. 
VII Komisija meni, da bilo mogoče inovativni pristop k spremljanju porabe za podnebne ukrepe in njegovo izvajanje v proračunu EU še izboljšati, med drugim z večjo razčlenjenostjo glede blažitve in prilagajanja.
At the same time, in light of the unclear administrative impact and the complexity of avoiding double counting while reflecting the frequent associated co-benefits, the Commission does not currently foresee further disaggregation in its tracking system. 
Istočasno Komisija glede na nejasne upravne učinke in zapletenost izogibanja dvojnemu štetju ter ob upoštevanju povezanih posrednih koristi trenutno ne predvideva nadaljnje razčlenitve svojega sistema spremljanja.
VIII The Commission notes that some of the Court’s recommendations have already been or will be addressed (notably Recommendation 1, 6(b) and 6(c)), some are partially acceptable (Recommendations 2(a), 3, 4, 5 and 7(a)), some are not appropriate or feasible (Recommendations 2(c), 6(a) and 7(b)). 
VIII Komisija ugotavlja, da so nekatera priporočila Sodišča že bila ali še bodo obravnavana (zlasti priporočilo 1, 6(b) in 6(c)), nekatera so delno sprejemljiva (priporočila 2(a), 3, 4, 5 in 7(a)), nekatera pa niso ustrezna ali izvedljiva (priporočila 2(c), 6(a) in 7(b)).
Overall, the Commission considers that the mainstreaming approach has increased the climate contribution of the EU budget. 
Na splošno Komisija meni, da je pristop k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov povečal podnebni prispevek proračuna EU.
Introduction 01 The Commission is fully committed to fighting climate change. 
Uvod 01 Komisija se v celoti zavzema za boj proti podnebnim spremembam.
The EU approach to transitioning to low carbon and climate resilient economy is driven through policy measures, which seek to also shift investment patters, as shown for again by the Commission’s recent package of measures3. 
Pristop EU glede prehoda na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo, odporno na podnebne razmere, temelji na političnih ukrepih, ki poskušajo spremeniti tudi naložbene vzorce, kakor kaže tudi nedavni sveženj ukrepov Komisije3.
The public spending from the EU and Member States’ national budgets complements and seeks to speed up this transition. 
Javna poraba iz proračuna EU in nacionalnih proračunov držav članic dopolnjuje ta prehod in si ga prizadeva pospešiti.
02 The Commission considers the adaptation to unavoidable climate change and mitigation as complementary policy responses and seeks to address both simultaneously, where relevant. 
02 Komisija meni, da sta prilagajanje neizogibnim podnebnim spremembam in njihova blažitev dopolnjujoča se politična odziva, in poskuša obravnavati oba vidika hkrati, kadar je to ustrezno.
Reply of the Commission 64 05 The adaptation measures seek to reduce the climate-related risks to an acceptable level, based on projections of climate change. 
Odgovori Komisije 64 05 Ukrepi prilagajanja so namenjeni zmanjšanju tveganj v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami na sprejemljivo raven na podlagi napovedi podnebnih sprememb.
07 There are many drivers of the reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emission levels; chiefly, reduced energy intensity (less energy consumed per unit of GDP) and deployment of renewables. 
07 Obstaja veliko dejavnikov za zmanjšanje ravni emisij toplogrednih plinov (TGP); predvsem zmanjšanje energetske intenzivnosti (manjša poraba energije na enoto BDP).