natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The evaluation of the first gender-related BS programme revealed that, due to the lack of results indicators, the gender programme had a limited effect on other sectors. 
Pri vrednotenju prvega programa proračunske podpore v zvezi z enakostjo spolov se je pokazalo, da je imel program zaradi pomanjkanja kazalnikov rezultatov majhen učinek na druge sektorje.
In addition, gender mainstreaming could have been carried out more effectively and gender-based economic disparities had not decreased. (c) Gender had been taken into account in BS for social protection (two out of 15 indicators), justice (two out of 10 indicators) and health (three out of 18 indicators). 
Poleg tega bi se lahko vključevanje načela enakosti spolov izvajalo uspešneje, zmanjšale pa se niso niti ekonomske razlike na podlagi spola. (c) Vidik enakosti spolov je bil upoštevan pri proračunski podpori za socialno zaščito (pri dveh od 15 kazalnikov), pravosodje (pri dveh od desetih kazalnikov) in zdravstvo (pri treh od 18 kazalnikov).
For the PACC programme, the EU Delegation had not managed to have it included, as the ministry was against including it. (d) Human rights had only been specifically addressed in the justice sector (three out of 10 indicators), but none of these targets had been achieved so far. 
Delegaciji EU ni uspelo, da bi ta vidik vključila v program PACC, saj je temu nasprotovalo ministrstvo. (d) Človekove pravice so bile izrecno obravnavane le v pravosodnem sektorju (pri treh od desetih kazalnikov), vendar do zdaj še ni bil dosežen nobeden od teh ciljnih vrednosti.
96 Despite this targeting, no improvement could be observed for the period under review. 
96 Kljub temu v zvezi z obravnavanim obdobjem ni bilo mogoče opaziti nikakršnega izboljšanja.
Moreover, the EUŐs assessment of fundamental rights indicated that the situation had not improved since 2014. 
Iz ocene temeljnih pravic, ki jo je opravila EU, je razvidno, da se stanje od leta 2014 ni izboljšalo.
97 The limited progress in gender equality is confirmed by data from the United Nations Development Programme with regard to the gender inequality index33 and the human development index (HDI)34 for men and women (see Figure 13). 
97 Majhen napredek pri vprašanju enakosti spolov potrjujejo tudi podatki iz Programa Združenih narodov za razvoj, ki se nanašajo na indeks neenakosti med spoloma33 in indeks človekovega razvoja34 za moške in ženske (glej sliko 13).
39 Figure 13 Đ Gender inequality in Morocco Source: United Nations Development Programme 98 Freedom House also confirms the negative situation in Morocco with regard to human rights (see Figure 14). 
Slika 13 – Neenakost spolov v Maroku 37 0,80 0,70 0,60 0,50 0,40 0,30 0,20 0,10 0,00 2014 2015 Neenakost med spoloma 2016 HDI ženske 2017 HDI moški Indeks neenakosti med spoloma in človekovega razvoja (HDI) Programa Združenih narodov za razvoj Vir: Program Združenih narodov za razvoj 98 Tudi organizacija Freedom House potrjuje, da je stanje v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami v Maroku slabo (glej sliko 14).
The main issues they mention are the restrictive press laws, lack of internet freedom, failure to allow free assembly, and the lack of independence of the justice sector. 
Med glavnimi težavami, ki jih je navedla, so omejevalna zakonodaja o tisku, pomanjkanje svobode interneta, onemogočanje svobode združevanja in pomanjkanje neodvisnosti pravosodja.
In 2018, the score for MoroccoŐs civil liberties declined due to harsh state responses to major demonstrations throughout the year. 
Leta 2018 se je ocena v zvezi z državljanskimi svoboščinami za Maroko poslabšala zaradi ostrih odzivov države na velike demonstracije, ki so potekale vse leto.
Morocco is considered Ôpartially freeŐ (see Figure 15). 
Maroko velja za delno svobodno državo (glej sliko 15).
Figure 14 Đ Freedom House Index in Morocco Source: Freedom House. 40 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2014 2015 Gender inequality 2016 HDI female 2017 HDI male UNDP Gender inequality and HDI index 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Political Rights 5 5 5 5 5 Civil Liberties 4 4 4 4 5 Freedom rating 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Political rights; Civil Liberties; Freedom Rating: 1 = best / 7 = worst 
Slika 14 – Ocena Maroka na lestvici organizacije Freedom House Vir: Freedom House Slika 15 – Človekove pravice v Maroku 38 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Politične pravice 5 5 5 5 5 Državljanske svoboščine 4 4 4 4 5 Ocena svobode 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 5,0 Politične pravice, državljanske svoboščine, ocena svobode: 1 = najboljše / 7 = najslabše 43 42 42 41 41 40 40 39 39 38 38 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Združena ocena za človekove pravice v obdobju 2014–2018 Vir: Freedom House Združena ocena: 0 = najmanjša svoboda/100 = največja svoboda
Conclusions and recommendations 99 The audit examined the effectiveness of EU BS to priority sectors in Morocco. 
Zaključki in priporočila 99 Sodišče je v okviru revizije preučilo uspešnost proračunske podpore EU za prednostne sektorje v Maroku.
Based on an appropriate risk analysis and needs assessment, the Commission considered BS to be the right choice of aid delivery instrument. 
Komisija je na podlagi ustrezne analize tveganja in ocene potreb menila, da je proračunska podpora ustrezen instrument za zagotavljanje pomoči.
However, we concluded that its added value and ability to support reforms was limited due to sub-optimal focus, weak implementation and insufficient monitoring.The main weaknesses related to indicator design and results assessment. 
Vendar je Sodišče ugotovilo, da ima majhno dodano vrednost in ne more dobro spodbujati reform, in sicer zaradi neoptimalne osredotočenosti, slabega izvajanja in nezadostnega spremljanja. Glavne slabosti so bile povezane z oblikovanjem kazalnikov in oceno rezultatov.
Not all expected outputs were delivered, nor were disbursements always based on the achievement of targets. 
Vsi pričakovani izložki niso bili doseženi, poleg tega izplačila niso vedno temeljila na doseženih ciljih vrednostih.
Donor coordination was uneven. 
Usklajevanje med donatorji je bilo neenakomerno.
Moreover, there was no evidence that BS had supported the effective implementation of reforms. 
Poleg tega ni bilo dokazov, da je proračunska podpora podpirala uspešno izvajanje reform.
100 The Commission addressed needs identified in national and EU strategies. 
100 Komisija je obravnavala potrebe, opredeljene v nacionalnih strategijah in strategijah EU.
However, we found that the three priority sectors were too broadly defined, meaning BS was distributed across too many areas. 
Vendar je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so bili trije prednostni sektorji preširoko opredeljeni, kar pomeni, da je bila proračunska podpora porazdeljena med preštevilna področja.
This could weaken its impact (see paragraphs 25 and 26). 
To bi lahko omejilo njen učinek (glej odstavka 25 in 26).
The Commission had not used a transparent method to allocate amounts to sectoral BS programmes (see paragraph 27). 
Komisija pri dodelitvi sredstev sektorskim programom proračunske podpore ni uporabila pregledne metode (glej odstavek 27).
The Commission had not used the political standstill to reassess its operational priorities for Morocco and develop a clear strategy (see paragraphs 32 and 33). 
Zamrznitve političnega dialoga ni izkoristila za ponovno oceno operativnih prednostnih nalog za Maroko ter oblikovanje jasne strategije (glej odstavka 32 in 33).
With regard to donor coordination, Member States were keen to maintain their own visibility instead of aligning their objectives with those of the EU (see paragraph 35). 
V zvezi z usklajevanjem med donatorji so države članice rade ohranjale svojo prepoznavnost, namesto da bi svoje cilje uskladile s cilji EU (glej odstavek 35).
Furthermore, very few joint indicators, missions or evaluations were in place between the EU and other donors for the sectors audited (see paragraph 38). 
Poleg tega so EU in drugi donatorji za revidirane sektorje oblikovali zelo malo skupnih kazalnikov, misij ali vrednotenj (glej odstavek 38).
Recommendation 1 Đ Strengthen the focus of EU budget support in Morocco For the next single support framework, the Commission and the EEAS should: (i) reduce the number of sectors and prioritise them in order to take into account the objective of maximising the impact of EU assistance; (ii) apply a more transparent and better documented method to allocate amounts to sectoral BS programmes; (iii) reinforce joint programming with Member States to increase aid coordination and effectiveness. 
Priporočilo 1 – Krepitev osredotočenosti proračunske podpore EU v Maroku Komisija in ESZD naj v zvezi z naslednjim enotnim okvirom podpore: (i) zmanjšata število sektorjev in jih prednostno razvrstita ter tako upoštevata cilj povečanja učinka pomoči EU; (ii) uporabljata preglednejšo in bolje dokumentirano metodo za dodeljevanje sredstev sektorskim programom proračunske podpore; (iii) okrepita skupno načrtovanje programov z državami članicami ter tako povečata usklajevanje pomoči in njeno uspešnost.
Timeframe: June 2021 42 
Časovni okvir: junij 2021. 39
101 The Commission had not developed fully-fledged action plans with baseline data, results indicators and pre-defined targets. 
101 Komisija ni pripravila celovitih akcijskih načrtov z izhodiščnimi podatki, kazalniki rezultatov in predhodno opredeljenimi ciljnimi vrednostmi.
We noted weaknesses in the selection and use of indicators, as well as the use of output instead of outcome/impact indicators and outdated or missing baselines (see paragraphs 47 and 48). 
Sodišče je odkrilo slabosti pri izbiri in uporabi kazalnikov ter uporabo kazalnikov izložkov namesto kazalnikov izidov/učinka ter zastarela ali manjkajoča izhodišča (glej odstavka 47 in 48).
Recommendation 2 Đ Improve design of targets and performance indicators The Commission and the EEAS should strengthen its use of conditionality by: (i) defining specific and relevant performance indicators with ambitious targets to support reforms and demonstrate progress/results; (ii) making greater use of outcome-oriented indicators; (iii) setting clearer, more relevant and more up-to-date baselines for all indicators. 
Priporočilo 2 – Izboljšanje zasnove ciljnih vrednosti in kazalnikov smotrnosti Komisija in ESZD naj okrepita uporabo pogojev z: (i) določitvijo specifičnih in ustreznih kazalnikov smotrnosti skupaj z ambicioznimi ciljnimi vrednostmi za podporo reformam in dokazovanje napredka/rezultatov; (ii) večjo uporabo kazalnikov, usmerjenih v izid; (iii) določitvijo jasnejših, ustreznejših in bolj posodobljenih izhodišč za vse kazalnike.
Timeframe: December 2020 102 The EU Delegation had not formalised policy dialogue strategies with clear objectives, nor were the meetings with the ministries systematically documented. 
Časovni okvir: december 2020. 102 Delegacija EU ni formalizirala strategij glede dialogov o politikah z jasnimi cilji, poleg tega niso bili sistematično sestavljeni zapisniki sestankov z ministrstvi.
Contacts between the ministries and the EU Delegation did not always take place at the appropriate level (see paragraphs 54Đ56). 
Stiki med ministrstvi in delegacijo EU niso vedno potekali na ustrezni ravni (glej odstavke 54 do 56).
Recommendation 3 Đ Strengthen policy dialogue The Commission and the EEAS should strengthen their policy dialogue framework by adopting a policy dialogue strategy for all areas in which the EU provides support. 
Priporočilo 3 – Okrepitev dialoga o politikah Komisija in ESZD naj okrepita okvir dialoga o politikah s sprejetjem strategije dialoga o politikah za vsa področja, na katerih EU zagotavlja podporo.
This requires: (i) a clear and appropriate definition of the objectives and expected results of the dialogue; (ii) minutes should be drafted; (iii) assessments of the achievements of the policy dialogue strategy. 
Za to je treba: (i) jasno in ustrezno opredeliti cilje in pričakovane rezultate dialoga; (ii) sestavljati zapisnike; (iii) oceniti dosežke strategije dialoga o politikah.
Timeframe: December 2020 43 
Časovni okvir: december 2020.
103 The CommissionŐs assessment of the achievement of indicator-related targets was hampered by weaknesses such as payments made without verifying the reliability of the data, inappropriate calculations, payments made when targets had not been achieved and disbursements made despite a lack of progress. 
103 Komisijo so pri ocenjevanju doseganja ciljnih vrednosti v zvezi s kazalniki ovirale slabosti, kot so plačila, izvršena brez preverjanja zanesljivosti podatkov, neustrezni izračuni, plačila, izvršena kljub neizpolnitvi ciljnih vrednosti, in izplačila, izvršena kljub pomanjkanju napredka.
In addition, Ű 14.64 million was carried over to the next financial year, although the conditions stipulated in the financing agreement were not met (see paragraphs 58Đ61). 
Poleg tega je bilo 14,64 milijona EUR prenesenih v naslednje 40 41 proračunsko leto, čeprav pogoji, navedeni v sporazumu o financiranju, niso bili doseženi (glej odstavke 58 do 61).
Recommendation 4 Đ Enhance disbursement verification procedures The Commission should enhance its payment verification procedures by: (i) applying appropriate calculation methods (where relevant); (ii) disbursing funds only when there is reliable evidence that the target has actually been achieved; (iii) carrying over targets and related payments to another period only when beneficiaries have provided justification that the delays were due to external factors. 
Priporočilo 4 – Izboljšanje postopkov za preverjanje izplačil Komisija bi morala izboljšati svoje postopke za preverjanje plačil, in sicer: (i) z uporabo ustreznih metod izračuna (po potrebi); (ii) z izplačevanjem sredstev le na podlagi zanesljivih dokazov o tem, da je bila ciljna vrednost dejansko dosežena; (iii) s prenosom ciljnih vrednosti in povezanih plačil v drugo obdobje le, če upravičenci to utemeljijo s tem, da so njihove zamude posledica zunanjih dejavnikov.
Timeframe: December 2020 104 We found weaknesses in the CommissionŐs monitoring of BS operations. 
Časovni okvir: december 2020. 104 Sodišče je odkrilo slabosti pri spremljanju operacij proračunske podpore, ki ga izvaja Komisija.
For example, the Commission monitored programmes mainly when making payments related to the achievement of indicators, which was often too late to allow corrections to be made when there were delays (see paragraphs 47 and 62Đ64). 
Komisija je na primer programe spremljala predvsem takrat, ko je izvrševala plačila, ki so se nanašala na dosego kazalnikov, kar je bilo pogosto prepozno za popravke v primeru zamud (glej odstavke 47 in 62 do 64).
Recommendation 5 Đ Improve monitoring procedures The Commission should improve the monitoring of its BS operations by: (i) making greater use of field visits when monitoring programmes; (ii) strengthening assessments of sectoral strategies and monitoring their implementation using the indicators of the sectoral strategies; (iii) formally following up recommendations made by external experts and implementing those that are considered relevant. 
Priporočilo 5 – Izboljšanje postopkov spremljanja Komisija naj izboljša spremljanje operacij proračunske podpore: (i) z večjo uporabo obiskov na kraju samem pri spremljanju programov; (ii) z okrepitvijo ocen sektorskih strategij in spremljanjem njihovega izvajanja z uporabo kazalnikov sektorskih strategij; (iii) s formalnim spremljanjem izvajanja priporočil zunanjih strokovnjakov in izvajanjem tistih, ki štejejo za relevantne.
Timeframe: December 2020 105 Less than half of the BS targets had been achieved (see paragraphs 66Đ71). 
105 Dosežena je bila manj kot polovica ciljnih vrednosti proračunske podpore (glej odstavke 66 do 71).
Although progress had been made towards the objectives of the BS programmes in the sectors audited, it was limited (see paragraphs 72Đ86). 
Pri uresničevanju ciljev programov proračunske podpore v revidiranih sektorjih je bil napredek sicer dosežen, vendar je bil majhen (glej odstavke 72 do 86).
The implementation of ministriesŐ budgets had improved, but significant amounts remained to be spent. 
Izvrševanje proračunov ministrstev se je sicer izboljšalo, vendar so 42 precejšnja sredstva ostala neporabljena.
This puts the added value of BS into question (see paragraphs 73Đ74). 
To vzbuja pomisleke glede dodane vrednosti proračunske podpore (glej odstavka 73 in 74).
106 Visibility of EU support in Morocco was insufficient. 
106 Prepoznavnost podpore EU v Maroku ni bila zadostna.
The social protection BS programme had a general condition relating to visibility. 
V programu proračunske podpore za socialno zaščito je bil naveden splošen pogoj v zvezi s prepoznavnostjo.
The required action plan stipulated in the PACC financing agreement had been drafted, but not implemented. 
Akcijski načrt, določen v sporazumu o financiranju programa PACC, je bil sicer pripravljen, vendar se ni izvajal.
In the justice sector, an indicator relating to visibility had been added at a later stage, but targets had already been achieved when the addendum was signed. 
V pravosodnem sektorju je bil v poznejši fazi dodan kazalnik v zvezi s prepoznavnostjo, vendar so bile ob podpisu dodatka ciljne vrednosti že dosežene.
In the health programme, a budget was provided for visibility, but events only took place as from 2019 (see paragraphs 87Đ90). 
V zdravstvenem programu je bil predviden proračun za prepoznavnost, vendar so bili dogodki organizirani šele od leta 2019 (glej odstavke 87 do 90).
Recommendation 6 Đ Increase visibility of EU support The Commission and the EEAS should stipulate visibility conditions or indicators in its BS programmes in order to ensure that the EU support provided in Morocco is publicised. 
Priporočilo 6 – Povečanje prepoznavnosti podpore EU Komisija in ESZD naj v programih proračunske podpore določita pogoje in kazalnike v zvezi s prepoznavnostjo ter tako zagotovita, da je podpora EU, ki se zagotavlja v Maroku, oglaševana.
This should be a mandatory condition for disbursement in the financing agreement. 
To naj bo obvezen pogoj za izplačila v sporazumu o financiranju.
Timeframe: June 2020 45 
Časovni okvir: junij 2 020.
107 EU support targeted cross-cutting issues such as gender and human rights. Despite this targeting, only limited improvement could be observed for the period under review. (see paragraphs 94-98). 
107 Podpora EU je bila usmerjena v medsektorska vprašanja, kot sta enakost spolov in človekove pravice, vendar je bilo kljub temu v obravnavanem obdobju mogoče opaziti le malo izboljšanja Glej odstavke 94 do98).
This Report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 14 November 2019. 
To poročilo je sprejelo Evropsko računsko sodišče v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 14. novembra 2019.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner Lehne President 46 
Za Evropsko računsko sodišče Klaus-Heiner Lehne Predsednik 43
Annex III Đ Funding by other EU instruments (2014-2018) 49 Domain of EU support (contract portfolio 2014 Đ 2018) Contracted amount (euro) 1) NIF Đ Neighbourhood Investment Facility 199 966 000 2) EUTF Đ EU Trust Fund projects for Morocco 40 800 000 3) EIDHR Đ European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights 4 750 288 4) ENI Global allocation for Morocco 4 905 834 5) CSO Đ GENR-LA Đ Civil Society, Gender and Local authorities 3 732 747 6) HUM Đ Human development 1 586 000 Total 255 740 869 Source: European Commission. 
Priloga III – Financiranje na podlagi drugih instrumentov EU (2014–2018) 46 Področje podpore EU (portfelj pogodb v obdobju 2014–2018) Pogodbeni znesek (v EUR) 1) NIF – Sklad za spodbujanje naložb v sosedstvo 199 966 000 2) EUTF – projekti skrbniškega sklada EU za Maroko 40 800 000 3) EIDHR – evropski instrument za demokracijo in človekove pravice 4 750 288 4) Skupna sredstva, dodeljena Maroku v okviru evropskega instrumenta sosedstva 4 905 834 5) Civilna družba, enakost spolov in lokalni organi 3 732 747 6) Človekov razvoj 1 586 000 Skupaj 255 740 869 Vir: Evropska komisija
Annex V Đ Budget support programme objectives 51 BS Sector Overall objective Specific Objectives Health Increase equal access to qualitative healthcare. - equal access to primary healthcare; - improved management and skills of healthcare personnel; - improved governance; and - development of an integrated, computerized, accessible healthcare information system. 
Priloga V – Cilji programa proračunske podpore 48 Sektor proračunske podpore Splošni cilj Specifični cilji Zdravstvo Povečati enak dostop do kakovostnega zdravstvenega varstva. - Enak dostop do primarnega zdravstvenega varstva, - boljše upravljanje zdravstvenega osebja ter izboljšanje njegove usposobljenosti, - boljše upravljanje ter - razvoj integriranega, računalniško podprtega in dostopnega informacijskega sistema zdravstvenega varstva.
Social Protection Contribute to reducing inequality, improving social cohesion and tangibly improving human development in Moroccan society by promoting equal access to social and basic services. - implementation of an integrated, unified social protection policy; - extension of basic medical coverage to all socio-professional categories and improved coverage of disadvantaged populations; - development of social assistance by better targeting populations in precarious situations; and - development of social services through accredited social protection centres. 
Socialna zaščita Prispevati k zmanjševanju neenakosti, izboljšanju socialne kohezije in oprijemljivemu izboljšanju človekovega razvoja v maroški družbi s spodbujanjem enakega dostopa do socialnih in osnovnih storitev. - Izvajanje celostne in enotne politike socialne zaščite, - razširitev osnovnega zdravstvenega zavarovanja na vse družbeno-poklicne kategorije in boljše zajetje prikrajšanih skupin prebivalstva, - razvoj socialne pomoči z boljšo ciljno usmerjenostjo na skupine prebivalstva v negotovem položaju in - razvoj socialnih storitev prek akreditiranih centrov za socialno zaščito.
Justice Reinforce the rule of law through an accessible, independent judicial system that meets international standards. - independent justice sector; - improved access to rights and justice; - increased judicial protection of rights and liberties; and - increased effectiveness and efficiency of justice. 
Pravosodje Okrepiti pravno državo z dostopnim in neodvisnim pravosodnim sistemom, ki izpolnjuje mednarodne standarde. - Neodvisen pravosodni sektor, - izboljšan dostop do pravic in pravnega varstva, - okrepljeno sodno varstvo pravic in svoboščin ter - večja uspešnost in učinkovitost sodstva.
PACC Support the competitiveness and growth of Morocco, with the ultimate aim of supporting the country in its ambition of sustainable development and the creation of decent jobs. - increased competitiveness through reinforced implementation of national industrial policy; - increased Moroccan export potential; and - support for transition towards a greener economy and industry. 
49 PACC Podpirati konkurenčnost Maroka in njegovo rast, pri čemer je končni cilj podpora tej državi pri doseganju njenega cilja glede trajnostnega razvoja in ustvarjanja dostojnih delovnih mest. - Večja konkurenčnost na podlagi okrepljenega izvajanja nacionalne industrijske politike, - večji izvozni potencial Maroka in - podpora prehodu na okolju prijaznejše gospodarstvo in industrijo.
Source: European Commission. 
Vir: Evropska komisija