natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The reservation on rural development measures under Axis 2 is based on Commission guidelines which provide for materiality to be assessed at EU level per ABB activity. 
Pridržek v zvezi z ukrepi za razvoj podeželja v okviru osi 2 temelji na smernicah Komisije, ki določajo, da je treba pomembnost oceniti na ravni EU za vsako dejavnost ABB.
With regard to the lifting of the reserve for Greece, see the Commission’s reply to paragraph 3.69. 
Glede umika pridržka za Grčijo glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 3.69.
The Annual Activity Report 2009 of the Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development mentions that the residual error rate for agricultural expenditure as a whole is below 2 %, while for the EAFRD it is slightly above. 
Letno poročilo o delu Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja za leto 2009 navaja, da je stopnja preostalih napak za kmetijske odhodke v celoti pod 2 %, medtem ko je za EKSRP neko­ liko nad to vrednostjo.
EN 80 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.67. TheCourtdoesnotendorseDGAGRI’sapproach which restricts the concept of the residual error to anomalies established during on-the-spot inspections. This approach ignores residual errors resulting from cross checks made on the basis of inaccurate databases or inadequate follow up of anomalies. 
SL 80 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.67 Sodišče ne podpira pristopa GD AGRI, ki koncept preostalih napak omejuje na nepravilnosti, ugotovljene med inšpekcijskimi pregledi na kraju samem. Pri tem pristopu se ne upoštevajo preostale napake, ki nastanejo pri navzkrižnih preverjanjih, izvedenih na podlagi netočnih podatkovnih zbirk ali neustreznega nadaljnjega ukrepanja glede nepravilnosti.
The Court applies an integrated audit approach which covers for every transaction both components of the residual error. 
Sodišče uporablja integriran revizijski pristop, ki za vsako tran­ sakcijo obsega obe komponenti preostalih napak.
The Court’s audit has shown that, for several transactions, administrative controls failed to detect errors. 
Pri reviziji Sodišča se je pokazalo, da so administrativne kontrole pri več transakcijah spregledale napake.
These weaknesses in the administrative controls are equally confirmed by the Court’s IACS systems audit results. 
Te slabosti administrativnih kontrol so potrdili tudi rezultati revizije, ki jo je Sodišče izvedlo v zvezi s sistemi IAKS.
Furthermore, the Court’s audit revealed that only limited assurance can be placed on the quality of on-the-spot inspections carried out by Member States. 
Poleg tega se je pri reviziji Sodišča pokazalo, da kakovost inšpekcijskih pregledov na kraju samem, ki jih izvajajo države članice, daje samo omejeno zagotovilo.
3.68. TheAARoftheDirectorGeneralforAgriculture contains a reservation in respect of the expenditure under the IACS in Bulgaria and Romania. 
3.68 Letno poročilo o dejavnostih, ki ga je pripravil gene­ ralni direktor za kmetijstvo, vsebuje pridržek glede odhodkov v okviru IAKS v Bolgariji in Romuniji.
Whilst those reservations are consistent with the results of the Court’s systems audit carried out in 2008, the Court reiterates its previous obser­ vation that it was premature to lift the long standing reser­ vation in respect of IACS in Greece. 3.69. 
Ta pridržek je sicer v skladu z rezultati revizije teh sistemov, ki jo je Sodišče izvedlo leta 2008, vendar Sodišče ponavlja že izraženo opažanje, da je bil dolgoleten pridržek v zvezi z IAKS v Grčiji umaknjen prehitro.
TheAARsoftheDirectorGeneralsforEnvironment and for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries contain reservations which are in line with the Court’s previous findings. 
3.69 V letnih poročilih o dejavnostih generalnih direktorjev za okolje ter za pomorske zadeve in ribištvo so navedeni pridržki, ki so v skladu s prejšnjimi ugotovitvami Sodišča.
While the AAR of the Director General for Health and Consumers contains no reservation, the errors affecting the Food and Feed Safety activities, in addition to an insufficient audit coverage should have led to a reservation. 
V letnem poročilu o dejavnostih generalnega direktorja za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov ni pridržkov, vendar bi v poročilu moral biti pridržek zaradi napak, ki vplivajo na dejavnosti na področju varnosti živil in krme, ter nezadostnega obsega revizij.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.70. Based on its audit work, the Court concludes that the payments for the year ended 31 December 2009 for Agri­ culture and Natural Resources were affected by material error. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 3.70 Sodišče je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela prišlo do zaključka, da so na plačila za kmetijstvo in naravne vire za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2009, vplivale pomembne napake.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.67. Member States are required under the relevant EU rules to carry out administrative controls on all aid applications received. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.67 Od držav članic se zahteva, da v okviru ustreznih predpisov EU izvajajo administrativne kontrole vseh prejetih zahtevkov za pomoč.
In principle, payments are consequently free from any errors which can be detected through such administrative controls. 
Tako so plačila načeloma brez napak, ki se lahko odkrijejo med takimi administrativnimi kontrolami.
DG AGRI’s approach of determining the residual error rate on the basis of the results of the randomly selected on-the-spot checks is therefore conceptually correct. 
Pristop GD AGRI za določitev stopnje preostalih napak na podlagi rezultatov naključno izbranih pregledov na kraju samem je torej v zasnovi pravilen.
The Commission is aware that weaknesses in the administrative controls or on-the-spot checks imply the risk that the error rates in the control statistics which it receives from Member States are under­ stated. 
Komisija se zaveda, da slabosti pri administrativnih kontrolah ali pregledih na kraju samem vsebujejo tveganje, da so stopnje napak v kontrolnih statističnih podatkih, prejetih od držav članic, podce­ njene.
To address this risk, DG AGRI applied a safety margin of a 25 % increase in these error rates. 3.68. 
Za obravnavo tega tveganja je GD AGRI uporabil varnostno rezervo 25-odstotnega povečanja teh stopenj napak.
The reservation for Greece was justified by the high repu­ tational risk for the Commission which resulted from the insufficient implementation of the IACS in Greece and not by the financial risk for the EU budget resulting from the deficiencies, which has always been covered by the financial corrections imposed on Greece through the conformity clearance procedures. 
3.68 Pridržek v zvezi z Grčijo je upravičevalo visoko tveganje ogrožanja ugleda Komisije, ki je posledica nezadostnega izvajanja IAKS v Grčiji, in ne finančno tveganje za proračun EU zaradi pomanjkljivosti, ki je bilo vedno zajeto v finančnih popravkih, nalo­ ženih Grčiji na podlagi postopkov potrditve skladnosti.
After Greece had completed its action plan to remedy the deficiencies by the end of 2008, this high reputational risk no longer existed and it was therefore fully justified to lift the reservation. 
Ko je Grčija dokončala svoj akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti do konca leta 2008, tega visokega tveganja ogrožanja ugleda ni bilo več, zato je bil umik pridržka povsem upravičen.
Furthermore, the financial risk for past defi­ ciencies is sufficiently covered under the conformity clearance procedure by which, until now, some 866 million EUR has been or is being excluded from EU financing. 3.69. 
Poleg tega je finančno tveganje za pretekle pomanjkljivosti zadostno zajeto v postopku potrditve sklad­ nosti, v okviru katerega je bilo do zdaj iz financiranja EU izvzetih ali je v postopku izvzema približno 866 milijonov EUR.
Thanks to additional human resources and using extra capacity by externalising some audits, a significant part of the total amount to be paid in 2010 has been and will be audited. 
3.69 Dodatni kadrovski viri in uporaba dodatnih zmogljivosti na podlagi zunanjega naročanja nekaterih revizij so omogočili, da je bil precejšnji del skupnega zneska, predvidenega za izplačilo v letu 2010, že revidiran oziroma bo revidiran.
Ex-ante audits are performed on almost 40 % of this amount. 
Predhodne revizije se izvajajo za skoraj 40 % tega zneska.
In addition more than 35 % of the amount will be ex-post audited. 
Poleg tega bodo za več kot 35 % zneska opravljene naknadne revizije.
This will lead to a very high coverage level. 
Stopnja pokritosti bo torej zelo visoka.
3.70. The Commission considers that an error rate which over the recent years oscillates around 2% confirms the overall positive assessment of previous years. 
3.70 Komisija meni, da stopnja napak, ki se je v zadnjih letih gibala okoli 2 %, potrjuje splošno pozitivno oceno iz prejšnjih let.
Moreover the risk to the EU budget is adequately covered by the conformity clearance procedure. 
Poleg tega je tveganje za proračun EU ustrezno zajeto v postopku potrditve skladnosti.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 81 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.71. Based on its audit work, the Court concludes that the supervisory and control systems for Agriculture and Natural Resources were generally, at most, partially effective in ensuring the regularity of payments. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 81 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.71 NapodlagisvojegarevizijskegadelajeSodiščeprišlo do zaključka, da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za kmetijstvo in naravne vire pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti plačil na splošno v najboljšem primeru delno uspešni.
3.72. AsregardsIACStheCourtconcludesthatsignificant improvements are necessary especially in three out of the eight paying agencies audited (see paragraph 3.33). 
3.72 V zvezi z IAKS je Sodišče prišlo do zaključka, da so predvsem v treh od osmih revidiranih plačilnih agencij potrebne precejšnje izboljšave (glej odstavek 3.33).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.71.-3.72. The Commission continues to consider that, as the Court acknowledged in previous annual reports since 2005, the IACS is generally an effective control system for limiting the risk of error or irregular expenditure, provided that it is properly applied (see also Commission reply to paragraphs 3.32 and 3.33). 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.71–3.72 Komisija še naprej ugotavlja, kakor je Sodišče potrdilo v prejšnjih letnih poročilih od leta 2005 naprej, da je IAKS na splošno učinkovit kontrolni sistem za omejevanje tveganja napak ali nepravilnih odhodkov, če se seveda pravilno uporablja (glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavka 3.32 in 3.33).
The Commission found that for claim year 2008, significant defi­ ciencies existed in the IACS in Bulgaria and Romania. 
Komisija je ugotovila, da je v letu oddaje zahtevkov 2008 prišlo do pomembnih pomanjkljivosti pri IAKS v Bolgariji in Romuniji.
Since, however, the completion of these action plans is only foreseen for 2011 and there are already some delays in the implementation of the individual actions, the Director-General of DG AGRI made a reservation for the IACS in Bulgaria and Romania in his 2009 annual activity report, based on the reputational risk for the Commission. 
Ker pa naj bi se ti akcijski načrti končali šele leta 2011 in je že prišlo do nekaterih zamud pri izvajanju posameznih ukrepov, je generalni direktor GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja v svojem letnem poročilu o delu za leto 2009 izrazil pridržek v zvezi z IAKS v Bolgariji in Romuniji zaradi tveganja ogrožanja ugleda Komisije.
Other Member States have deficiencies of a lesser nature in their IACS which do not render their systems ineffective but, rather, perfectible and for which they have taken or are taking action to resolve their deficiencies. 
Pri drugih državah članicah so bile ugotovljene manjše pomanjklji­ vosti v zvezi z njihovimi IAKS, vendar to še ne pomeni, da so njihovi sistemi neučinkoviti, temveč jih je treba le izboljšati, zato so že sprejele oziroma sprejemajo ukrepe za odpravo pomanjkljivosti.
All these deficiencies are followed up through conformity clearance procedures which ensure that the risk to the EU budget is adequately covered. 
Vse te pomanjkljivosti se nadalje spremljajo na podlagi postopkov potrditve skladnosti, kar zagotavlja, da je tveganje za proračun EU ustrezno pokrito.
Updates to the LPIS are always needed because both the technical possibilities and the reality in the field are constantly evolving. 
Posodobitve LPIS so vedno potrebne, saj se tehnične možnosti in realnost na terenu nenehno razvijajo.
Moreover, it is now a legal obligation for the Member States to make an annual assessment of the quality of their LPIS. 
Poleg tega imajo zdaj države članice pravno obveznost, da opravijo letno oceno kakovosti svojih LPIS.
The result of the quality check will indicate whether a refresh is needed. 
Rezultat preverjanja kakovosti bo pokazal, ali je potrebna osvežitev.
3.73. (a) The Commission is on a continuing basis working, together with the Member States, on actions to improve the reliability of information in the LPIS-GIS. 
3.73 (a) Komisija z državami članicami nenehno sodeluje pri ukrepih za izboljšanje zanesljivosti informacij v LPIS-GIS.
As from claim year 2010 Member States are obliged to perform a quality assessment of the LPIS-GIS on an annual basis according to pre-determined procedures and to report on the results and the actions envisaged to, where required, improve the situation. (b) Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 885/2006, as part of the accreditation criteria, already requires that there is an audit trail. 
Od leta oddaje zahtevkov 2010 naprej morajo države članice na letni ravni opraviti oceno kakovosti LPIS-GIS v skladu z vnaprej opredelje­ nimi postopki ter po potrebi poročati o rezultatih in predvidenih ukrepih za izboljšanje položaja. (b) Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št. 885/2006 kot del pogojev za akreditacijo že zahteva vzpostavitev revizijske sledi.
These criteria are checked by the certification bodies on an annual basis. 
Te pogoje certifikacijski organi preverjajo vsako leto.
In this regard, the most urgent defi­ ciencies to be addressed for the SPS and SAPS are: (a) to overcome the systems weaknesses leading to errors relating to ineligible land or over-declarations of land as well as inaccurate entitlements, notably by improving the reliability and completeness of the data recorded in the LPIS (e.g. most recent ortho-photos); (b) to ensure that all IACS databases provide a reliable and full audit trail for all modifications made; 
Najnujnejše pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je v zvezi s tem treba odpraviti pri SEP in SEPP, so: (a) treba je odpraviti sistemske slabosti, ki povzročajo napake v zvezi z neupravičenimi zemljišči ali prijavljenimi preve­ likimi površinami ter netočnimi pravicami, predvsem z izboljšanjem zanesljivosti in popolnosti podatkov v LPIS (tj. najnovejših orto-foto posnetkov); (b) treba je zagotoviti, da vse podatkovne zbirke IAKS zagota­ vljajo zanesljivo in popolno revizijsko sled za vse spre­ membe;
EN 82 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S (c) to clarify and enforce further the rules so that EU direct aid is not paid to claimants who have neither used the land for farming nor maintained it in GAEC; T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S (c) The issue of the farmer definition referred to by the Court has been addressed in the framework of the Health Check by giving Member States the possibility to exclude natural or legal persons from the direct payment schemes whose principal business objects do not consist of exercising an agricultural activity or whose agricultural activities are insignificant (Article 28(2) of Regu­ lation (EC) No 73/2009). 
3.74 Sodišče prav tako ponavlja, da so na področju razvoja podeželja potrebna dodatna prizadevanja za nadaljnjo poeno­ stavitev pravil in pogojev. O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E (c) Vprašanje opredelitve kmetov, ki ga je poudarilo Sodišče, je bilo obravnavano v okviru sistematskega pregleda SKP, ko je bilo državam članicam omogočeno, da iz shem neposrednih plačil izključijo tiste fizične ali pravne osebe, katerih glavna dejavnost ni opravljanje kmetijske dejavnosti ali katerih kmetijske dejavnosti predstavljajo le majhen delež (člen 28(2) Uredbe (ES) št.
Further reflections on this issue may be envisaged in the context of the post-2013 CAP, bearing in mind the need to avoid complicated rules which would result in a complex control system whose implementation would be costly and contrary to the simplification efforts of the Commission. (d) The current system provides for a common legal framework within which the Member States are responsible for defining the maintenance criteria under the GAEC. This allows for the diversity of agricultural areas and traditions in the EU to be taken into account. 
Nadaljnji premisleki o tem vprašanju se lahko opravijo v okviru skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013 ob upoštevanju potrebe, da se izognemo zapletenim pravilom, ki bi vodila h kompleks­ nemu kontrolnemu sistemu, katerega izvajanje bi bilo stroškovno neugodno in v nasprotju s prizadevanji Komisije za poenosta­ vitev. (d) Trenutni sistem ponuja skupni pravni okvir, v okviru katerega so države članice pristojne za določitev meril za ohranjanje dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev, zato lahko pride do izraza raznolikost kmetijskih površin in tradicij v EU.
For the 2007-2013 period, the Commission has already implemented simplifications in the Common Agricultural Policy, including rural development, and will continue to do so in future. 
3.74 Za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 je Komisija že uvedla poenostavitve skupne kmetijske politike, vključno z razvojem podeželja, s čimer bo nadaljevala tudi v prihodnje.
However, any such further simplification will not be enough to reduce the error rate in certain areas of rural development below the Court’s 2 % threshold without the risk of jeopardising policy objectives. 
Kljub temu pa nadaljnja poenostavitev ne bo dovolj za zmanjšanje stopnje napak na nekaterih področjih razvoja podeželja pod 2-odstotni prag Sodišča, ne da bi bilo ob tem ogroženo doseganje ciljev politike.
Therefore, the Commission has proposed that for EAFRD expen­ diture, a tolerable risk of error level be set in the range between 2 and 5 %. 
Zato je Komisija predla­ gala, da se za odhodke EKSRP določi tolerančno tveganje stopnje napak v razponu od 2 % do 5 %.
An error rate around the middle of this range would be acceptable and justified. 
Stopnja napak v sredini tega razpona bi bila sprejemljiva in upravičena.
Above this level, additional action would be taken to reduce the error rate through increased controls and addressing the major causes of error. 3.75. 
Nad to stopnjo bi bilo treba sprejeti dodatne ukrepe za znižanje stopnje napak, ki bi vključe­ vali pogostejše kontrole in obravnavo glavnih vzrokov napak.
The Commission considers the overall structure and reporting requirements of these to be appropriate, particularly as a basis for the financial clearance decision (see also paragraph 3.54). 
3.75 Komisija meni, da so splošna struktura in zahteve za poročanje iz teh smernic ustrezne, zlasti kot podlaga za sklepe o finančni potrditvi obračunov (glej tudi odstavek 3.54).
The revised guidelines for financial year 2010 were distributed in the Agriculture Funds Committee meeting of 18 June 2010. 
Revidirane smernice za proračunsko leto 2010 so bile udeležencem razdeljene 18. junija 2010 na seji Odbora za kmetijske sklade.
Changes were limited to the reporting modalities and did not affect the work to be carried out by the certification bodies. 
Spremembe so bile omejene na načine poročanja, niso pa vplivale na delo, ki ga morajo opraviti certifikacijski organi.
Moreover, with regard to the work related to the control and inspection statistics, the Commission has recently put forward a system by which Member States can reinforce the overall framework for gaining reasonable assurance as to the legality and regularity of transactions at the level of final beneficiaries. 
Poleg tega pa je v zvezi z delom, povezanim s statističnimi podatki kontrol in inšpekcijskih pregledov, Komisija pred kratkim ponudila sistem, na podlagi katerega lahko države članice okrepijo splošni okvir, da bi pridobile zadostno zagotovilo v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo transakcij na ravni končnih upravičencev.
To this end, certification bodies should extend their work beyond the present requirements by fully re-performing, for a given expenditure popu­ lation, a representative sample of transactions which the paying agency in question has checked on-the-spot. 
V ta namen bi morali certifikacijski organi razširiti obseg svojega dela prek sedanjih zahtev, kar pomeni, da bi za določeno populacijo odhodkov ponovno izvedli pregled celotnega reprezentativnega vzorca transakcij, ki jih je zadevna plačilna agencija preverila na kraju samem.
The work would cover the entire handling of the file, from receipt of the aid application to the calculation and execution of the final payment. (d) to set at EU level minimum annual maintenance requirements for grassland to be eligible for EU direct aid. 
To naj bi zaje­ malo celotno obravnavo spisa, od prejema zahtevka za pomoč do izračuna končnega plačila.
The Court also reiterates that further efforts are required in the area of Rural Development to further simplify the rules and conditions. 3.75. Furthermore, the Court considers that the Commission guidelines as regards the work to be performed by certification bodies must be reviewed concerning the nature, coverage and reporting obligations, especially as regards the work related to the validation of Member States’ control and inspection statistics. 
3.75 Poleg tega Sodišče meni, da je treba posodobiti smer­ nice Komisije v zvezi z delom, ki ga morajo opraviti certifi­ kacijski organi, in sicer glede značilnosti in obsega dela ter obveznosti poročanja, predvsem v zvezi z delom, povezanim s potrjevanjem statističnih podatkov inšpekcijskih pregledov in kontrol držav članic.
Internal controls on payments for animal disease eradication and monitoring programmes to the Member States require a clear segregation of functions between the Commission services and the devel­ opment of appropriate formal control procedures. 
Notranje kontrole plačil državam članicam za programe za izkoreninjenje in spremljanje živalskih bolezni zahtevajo jasno ločevanje nalog med službami Komisije in razvoj ustreznih formalnih kontrolnih postopkov.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.76. For the programming period 2000-2006, the Commission took all the necessary actions to correct ineligible amounts. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.76 Za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 je Komisija sprejela vse potrebne ukrepe v zvezi s popravki neupravičenih zneskov.
During the closure exercise it will be ensured that all ineligible amounts are deducted from final claim. 
V okviru naloge zaključevanja programa bo poskrbljeno, da se od konč­ nega zahtevka odštejejo vsi neupravičeni zneski.
Under the EFF, the control environment has been reinforced with new provisions on the effective functioning of the systems to prevent and to correct ineligible expenditure. 
Pri ESR je bilo obvladovalno okolje okrepljeno z novimi določbami o učinkovitem delovanju sistemov, da se preprečijo in popravijo neupra­ vičeni odhodki.
The Commission exercises a super­ visory role, verifying the reliance which can be placed on the work of the Audit Authorities in the Member States. 
Komisija ima nadzorno vlogo, v okviru katere preverja zanesljivost dela revizijskih organov v državah članicah.
Under shared management, responsibility for control on the ground rests with the Member States. 
Na podlagi deljenega upravljanja odgovornost za nadzor na terenu nosijo države članice.
The control environment described above ensures that the Member States have put in place reliable and effective management and control systems to prevent and to correct ineligible expenditure. 
Zgoraj opisano obvladovalno okolje zagotavlja, da so države članice vzpostavile zanesljive in učinkovite sisteme upravljanja in nadzora, da se preprečijo in popravijo neupravičeni odhodki.