natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Horizon 2020 foresees that the audit of expenditure of all actions shall be carried out in a coordinated manner: ‘Audits of expenditure on indirect actions under Horizon 2020 shall be carried out in a coherent manner in accordance with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness in order to minimise the audit burden of the participants.’ Recommendation 6 The Commission considers that the legal framework of JTIs should not only take account of its staff complement but also of the considerable budgetary resources that are allocated to these JTIs. 
V okviru programa Obzorje 2020 je predvideno, da bodo revizije izdatkov vseh ukrepov izvedene skladno: „Revizije izdatkov za posredne ukrepe v okviru Obzorja 2020 se izvajajo dosledno in v skladu z načeli gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti, da se omeji breme revizije za udeležence.“ Priporočilo 6 Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba v pravnem okviru skupnih tehnoloških pobud upoštevati tako število zaposlenih kot tudi znatna proračunska sredstva, ki so dodeljena tem skupnim tehnološkim pobudam.
This will have to be considered before any control requirements are modified. 
To bo treba obravnavati, še preden se spremeni katera koli zahteva za nadzor.
The new Financial Regulation introduces in its Article 209 the possibility for the JTIs to have more flexible, tailor-made rules adopted in accordance with the model financial regulation for PPP bodies, which shall lay down the principles necessary to ensure sound financial management and be based on Article 60 of the Financial Regulation on indirect management. 
Nova finančna uredba v členu 209 uvaja možnost, da imajo skupne tehnološke pobude bolj prožna, prilagojena pravila, sprejeta v skladu z vzorčno finančno uredbo za organe, pooblaščene za izvajanje JZP, v kateri so določena načela, potrebna za zagotavljanje dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, in ki temelji na členu 60 finančne uredbe o posrednem upravljanju.
The Commission agrees that the powers of the executive director and governing board should be reconsidered in the new constituent instruments of JTIs under Horizon 2020. 
Komisija se strinja, da bi bilo treba pooblastila izvršnega direktorja in upravnega odbora ponovno proučiti glede na nove akte o ustanovitvi tehnoloških pobud v okviru programa Obzorje 2020.
The RSFF interim evaluation has demonstrated the added value of the RSFF. 
Vmesna ocena Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja je dokazala njegovo dodano vrednost.
It deserves emphasis that the additionality of public support is a complex and multidimensional concept encompassing in addition to pure project additionality (whether the project would have been carried out in the absence of public funding) also scale, scope, acceleration, partner, output, etc. Recommendation 7 The Commission agrees with the recommendation and will take it into account in the design of successor financial instruments and in the final evaluation of the RSFF. 
Poudariti je treba tudi, da je dodatnost javne podpore zapleten in večdimenzionalen koncept, ki presega zgolj dodatnost projekta (če bi bil projekt izveden brez javne podpore) ter zajema tudi obseg, področje uporabe, pospeševanje, partnerja, rezultat itd. Priporočilo 7 Komisija se strinja s priporočilom ter ga bo upoštevala pri oblikovanju naslednjih finančnih instrumentov in končni oceni Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja.
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 2/2013 Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2013 — 77 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9241-182-4 doi:10.2865/73998 
Evropsko računsko sodišče Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave? Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2013 – 77 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9241-197-8 doi:10.2865/76468
THE SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ACTIVITIES IS ONE OF THE UNION’S KEY INSTRUMENTS FOR FUNDING RESEARCH. 
SEDMI OKVIRNI PROGRAM ZA RAZISKAVE, TEHNOLOŠKI RAZVOJ IN PREDSTAVIT-VENE DEJAVNOSTI JE EDEN KLJUČNIH INSTRUMENTOV UNIJE ZA FINANCIRANJE RAZISKAV.
THIS REPORT EXAMINES THE COMMISSION’S MANAGEMENT OF THIS PROGRAMME. 
V TEM POROČILU JE PREUČENO, KAKO JE KOMISIJA UPRAVLJALA TA PROGRAM.
THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT THE COMMISSION HAS TAKEN STEPS TO SIMPLIFY AND IMPROVE THE PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT, BUT ENSURING EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION REMAINS A CHALLENGE IN A NUMBER OF AREAS. 
SODIŠČE JE PRIŠLO DO ZAKLJUČKA, DA JE KOMISIJA SPREJELA UKREPE ZA POENOSTAVITEV IN IZBOLJŠANJE PROGRAMA, VENDAR ZAGOTAVLJANJE UČINKOVITEGA IZVAJANJA NA VEČ PODROČJIH ŠE VEDNO OSTAJA IZZIV.
THE REPORT CONTAINS RECOMMENDATIONS, WHICH ARE AIMED AT HELPING THE COMMISSION TO IMPROVE THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CURRENT AND FUTURE FRAMEWORK PROGRAMMES. 
POROČILO VSEBUJE PRIPOROČILA, NAMENJENA KOT POMOČ KOMISIJI PRI IZBOLJŠANJU UPRAVLJANJA TEKOČEGA IN PRIHODNJIH OKVIRNIH PROGRAMOV.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-13-002-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJ-AB-13-002-SL-C
EuropEaN Court of audItorS EN HaS tHE EuropEaN GlobalISatIoN adjuStmENt fuNd dElIvErEd Eu addEd valuE IN rEINtEGratING rEduNdaNt workErS? 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE SL ALI JE EVROPSKI SKLAD ZA PRILAGODITEV GLOBALIZACIJI PRI PONOVNEM VKLJUČEVANJU PRESEŽNIH DELAVCEV USTVARIL DODANO VREDNOST EU?
Special report No 7 2013 ISSN 1831-0834 
Posebno poročilo št.
Special report No 7 2013 HaS tHE EuropEaN GlobalISatIoN adjuStmENt fuNd dElIvErEd Eu addEd valuE IN rEINtEGratING rEduNdaNt workErS? (pursuant to article 287(4), second subparagraph, tfEu) EuropEaN Court of audItorS 
Posebno poročilo št. 7 2013 ALI JE EVROPSKI SKLAD ZA PRILAGODITEV GLOBALIZACIJI PRI PONOVNEM VKLJUČEVANJU PRESEŽNIH DELAVCEV USTVARIL DODANO VREDNOST EU? (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EuropEan court of auditors 12, rue alcide de Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LuXEMBourG tel. +352 4398-1 fax +352 4398-46410 E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu internet: http://eca.europa.eu special report no 7 2013 more information on the European union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: eca-info@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. luxembourg: publications office of the European union, 2013 ISbN 978-92-9241-314-9 doi:10.2865/92721 © European union, 2013 reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Kataloški podatki so navedeni na koncu te publikacije. Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2013 ISBN 978-92-9241-329-3 doi:10.2865/96011 © Evropska unija, 2013 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
3 Paragraph I–V 1–8 9–13 14–71 14–24 17–18 19–21 22–24 25–46 29–34 35–46 47–59 51–53 54–56 57–59 Glossary ExEcutIVE summary IntroductIon audIt scopE and approach obsErVatIons nEarly all workErs wErE offErEd pErsonalIsEd and wEll-coordInatEd mEasurEs ServiceS were PerSonaliSed eGF meaSureS were Generally well-coordinated with national meaSureS and the eSF Some member StateS PreFerred the eSF over the eGF rEIntEGratIon Into EmploymEnt of EGf-supportEd workErs cannot bE rElIably assEssEd lack oF reinteGration objectiveS and SPeciFic eGF PerFormance data reinteGration data were diFFicult to comPare onE thIrd of EGf fundInG compEnsatEs natIonal workErs’ IncomE support schEmEs, wIth no Eu addEd ValuE workerS’ income SuPPort meaSureS rePreSent the majority oF the co-Funded exPenditure For halF oF the caSeS audited Globally, workerS’ income SuPPort meaSureS account For one third oF reFunded coStS diFFerent eGF co-FundinG in Similar economic circumStanceS CoNtENtS Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
3 Odstavek I–V 1–8 9–13 14–71 14–24 17–18 19–21 22–24 25–46 29–34 35–46 47–59 51–53 54–56 57–59 GLOSAR POVZETEK UVOD OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP OPAŽANJA SKORAJ VSEM DELAVCEM SO BILI PONUJENI PRILAGOJENI IN DOBRO USKLAJENI UKREPI STORITVE SO BILE PRILAGOJENE POSAMEZNIKOM UKREPI ESPG SO BILI NA SPLOŠNO DOBRO USKLAJENI Z NACIONALNIMI UKREPI IN ESS NEKATERE DRŽAVE ČLANICE SO RAJE UPORABLJALE ESS KOT ESPG PONOVNEGA VKLJUČEVANJA DELAVCEV, KI SO DOBILI PODPORO ESPG, V DELOVNO RAZMERJE NI MOGOČE ZANESLJIVO OCENITI POMANJKANJE CILJEV ZA PONOVNO VKLJUČEVANJE IN SPECIFIČNIH PODATKOV O USPEŠNOSTI ESPG PODATKE O PONOVNEM VKLJUČEVANJU JE BILO TEŽKO PRIMERJATI TRETJINA SREDSTEV ESPG NADOMEŠČA NACIONALNE SHEME DOHODKOVNE PODPORE ZA DELAVCE, IN TO BREZ DODANE VREDNOSTI EU UKREPI DOHODKOVNE PODPORE ZA DELAVCE PRI POLOVICI REVIDIRANIH ZADEV POMENIJO VEČJI DEL SOFINANCIRANIH ODHODKOV UKREPI DOHODKOVNE PODPORE ZA DELAVCE NA SPLOŠNO POMENIJO TRETJINO POVRNJENIH STROŠKOV RAZLIČNO SOFINANCIRANJE ESPG V PODOBNIH GOSPODARSKIH OKOLIŠČINAH VSEBINA Posebno poročilo št.
5 GloSSarY dG budget: directorate-General for the Budget dG Employment, social affairs and Inclusion: directorate-General for Employment, social affairs and inclusion Eca: European court of auditors (or ‘the court’) EGf: European Globalisation adjustment fund Esf: European social fund Eu added value: the Eu added value is the value that an Eu action adds to the value that would otherwise have been created by Member states acting alone. oEcd: organisation for Economic cooperation and development; 21 Eu Member states are currently members of the oEcd. workers’ income support: cash expenditure compensating for unemployment. this includes redundancy payments out of public resources as well as pensions to beneficiaries before they reach the ‘standard’ pensionable age if these payments are made because they are out of work or otherwise for reasons of labour market policy. see ‘an interpretative guide to the oEcd social expenditure database’, oEcd, 2007. 
To vključuje odpravnine, ki se plačujejo iz javnih sredstev, in pokojnine za upravičence pred dopolnjeno „standardno“ upokojitveno starostjo, če se izplačujejo zaradi brezposelnosti ali iz razlogov v zvezi s politiko trga dela. Glej An Interpretative Guide to the OECD Social Expenditure Database (Razlagalni vodič po podatkovni zbirki socialnih izdatkov OECD), OECD, 2007. ERS: Evropsko računsko sodišče (ali „Sodišče“) ESPG: Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji ESS: Evropski socialni sklad GD za proračun: Generalni direktorat za proračun GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje: Generalni direktorat za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje OECD: Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj; zdaj je v OECD včlanjenih 21 držav članic EU.
However, whereas the purpose of the Esf is to address long-term structural imbalances, the EGf was designed to address short-term and ad hoc emergency situations. 
Toda ESS je za razliko od ESPG, ki je bil zasnovan za kratkoročno podporo v nujnih primerih, namenjen odpravljanju dolgoročnih strukturnih neravnovesij.
EXECutIvE SummarY (d) the EGf delivered Eu added value when used to co-finance services for redundant workers or allowances not ordinarily existing under Member states’ unemployment benefit systems. (e) However, in all the audited cases, the court identified measures to provide workers with income support, which would have been paid by the Member states anyway. sixteen of the 19 Member states that benefited from the EGf included income support measures in their packages. 
POVZETEK (d) ESPG je dodano vrednost EU ustvaril, ko so se njegova sredstva uporabljala za sofinanciranje storitev za presežne delavce ali nadomestil, ki v sistemih nadomestil za brezposelnost držav članic praviloma ne obstajajo; (e) toda Sodišče je v vseh revidiranih zadevah odkrilo tudi ukrepe za zagotavljanje dohodkovne podpore za delavce, ki bi jih sicer plačale države članice. Ukrepe dohodkovne podpore je v svoje svežnje vključilo kar šestnajst od devetnajstih držav članic, ki so prejele sredstva ESPG.
Globally, income support measures represented 33 % of the costs refunded for all EGf cases. (f) the EGf approval procedure, requiring the need for an ad hoc budgetary procedure, is very long. this hampers Eu solidarity with the redundant workers targeted. iii. v. until 31 december 2012, EGf aid packages represented 627 million euro for 89 approved Member state applications. the EGf co-finances measures at a rate of 50 % or 65 %, with the balance being provided by the Member state concerned. iv. the court concluded that: (a) nearly all EGf eligible workers were offered personalised and well-coordinated measures. (b) Each EGf measure may also be eligible for the Esf and some Member states preferred to use the Esf rather than EGf. (c) no quantitative reintegration objectives were set. 
ESPG ukrepe sofinancira 50-ali 65-odstotno, razliko pa prispeva zadevna država članica. IV. Sodišče je prišlo do naslednjih zaključkov: (a) skoraj vsem delavcem, upravičenim do sredstev ESPG, so bili zagotovljeni prilagojeni in dobro usklajeni ukrepi; (b) vsi ukrepi ESPG so lahko upravičeni tudi do sredstev ESS in nekatere države članice so se raje odločile za uporabo sredstev ESS kot ESPG; (c) določeni niso bili nobeni količinsko opredeljeni cilji za ponovno vključevanje.
Moreover, existing data are not adequate to assess the effectiveness of the measures in reintegrating workers into employment. the court recommends that: (a) the Member states and the commission take the necessary steps to ensure the availability of up-to-date and reliable data in order to monitor the achievement of objectives, as well as to compare the outcome of the various measures; (b) the European parliament, the council and the commission consider limiting Eu funding to measures likely to provide Eu added value, rather than funding already existing national workers’ income support schemes; (c) the European parliament, the council and the commission consider, as an alternative to the current EGf scheme, the possibility of adapting the Esf framework and its funding allocations in order to support more rapidly workers affected by mass redundancies. Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
Poleg tega obstoječi podatki niso primerni za ocenjevanje uspešnosti ukrepov za ponovno vključevanje delavcev v delovno razmerje; Sodišče priporoča, naj: (a) države članice in Komisija sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da se zagotovi razpoložljivost posodobljenih in zanesljivih podatkov za spremljanje doseganja ciljev in primerjavo izidov različnih ukrepov; (b) Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija razmislijo o omejitvi sredstev EU na ukrepe, ki bodo najverjetneje ustvarili dodano vrednost EU, namesto da se z njimi financirajo že obstoječe nacionalne sheme dohodkovne podpore za delavce; (c) Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija kot o nadomestni možnosti za sedanjo shemo ESPG razmislijo o možnosti prilagoditve okvira ESS in dodeljevanja sredstev, da bi hitreje zagotovili podporo delavcem, ki jih je prizadelo množično odpuščanje presežnih delavcev. Posebno poročilo št. 7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU?
2. the EGf is outside the multiannual financial framework. as a result each application for EGf support submitted by a Member state has to pass a thorough assessment by the commission and obtain approval from the Eu budgetary authority (council and European parliament). the commission shares the management of the EGf with the Member states. 
2. ESPG ni zajet v večletni finančni okvir. Zato mora vsako vlogo za podporo ESPG, ki jo vloži država članica, temeljito oceniti Komisija in odobriti proračunski organ EU (Svet in Evropski parlament).
3. redundant workers can also benefit from the European social fund (Esf), mainly through lifelong learning programmes. 
3. Presežni delavci lahko prejmejo tudi pomoč iz Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS), zlasti prek programov vseživljenjskega učenja.
However, whereas the purpose of the Esf is to address long-term structural imbalances, the EGf was designed to address short-term and ad hoc emergency situations. 
Toda ESS je za razliko od ESPG, ki je bil zasnovan za kratkoročno podporo v nujnih primerih, namenjen odpravljanju dolgoročnih strukturnih neravnovesij. 4.
4. the EGf supports workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation (500 dismissals or more2 in one or more enterprises in the Eu) where those redundancies have a significant adverse impact on the regional or local economy (the ‘trade criterion’). in this respect, applicant Member states must demonstrate that the redundancies are linked to a substantial increase of imports into the Eu, the rapid decline of the Eu market share in a given sector or a delocalisation to third countries. 
ESPG podpira delavce, ki postanejo presežni zaradi velikih strukturnih sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih zaradi globalizacije (500 ali več odpuščenih2 v enem ali več podjetjih v EU), kadar imajo ti presežki delovne sile znaten škodljiv vpliv na regionalno ali lokalno gospodarstvo („merilo trgovine“). Zato morajo države članice prosilke dokazati, da je odpuščanje presežnih delavcev povezano z znatnim povečanjem uvoza v EU, hitrim padcem tržnega deleža EU v nekem sektorju ali preselitvijo proizvodnje v tretje države.
By way of derogation, from 1 May 2009 to 31 december 2011, the EGf was also applicable to workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis (the ‘crisis criterion’)3. 
Z odstopanjem od Uredbe o ESPG se je ESPG od 1. maja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 uporabljal tudi za delavce, ki so postali presežni neposredno zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize („merilo krize“)3.
1 regulation (Ec) no 1927/2006 of the European parliament and of the council of 20 december 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation adjustment fund (oJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 
1927/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (UL L 406, 30.12.2006, str.
1), as amended by regulation (Ec) no 546/2009 of the European parliament and of the council of 18 June 2009 (oJ L 167, 29.6.2009, p. 
546/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. junija 2009 (UL L 167, 29.6.2009, str.
26) — together the ‘EGf regulation’. see article 3 ‘Eligible actions’. 
26) – skupaj „Uredba o ESPG“. Glej člen 3 „Upravičeni ukrepi“.
2 until 30 May 2009, the threshold was 1 000 redundant workers. 
2 Do 30. maja 2009 je bila spodnja meja 1 000 presežnih delavcev.
3 articles 1 and 2 of the EGf regulation. the crisis criterion effectively only applied, under regulation (Ec) no 546/2009, from 18 June 2009 to 31 december 2011. 
3 Člena 1 in 2 Uredbe o ESPG.
Picture 1 for instance, when the effects of the crisis devastated the danish shipbuilding industry, there were redundancies as a consequence. in that Member state, the EGf supported redundant workers of the last danish shipyard (see Picture 1). another example is the German automotive supply industry, which was particularly hit in the regions of Lower saxony and north rhine-Westphalia (see Picture 2). from 9 March 2007 (date of the first application) to 31 december 2012, total EGf aid approved amounted to 627 million euro (379 million euro from the Eu budget and 247 million euro from the Member states) for 89 approved applications4 from a maximum yearly budgetary ceiling of 500 million euro during the 2007–13 period. the EGf co-finances measures at a rate of 50 % or 65 %5, with the difference coming from the Member state concerned. the EGf is currently scheduled to run until 31 december 2013. the commission has however proposed continuing with a new EGf regulation until 31 december 20206. 
ESPG je v tej državi članici podpiral presežne delavce zadnje ladjedelnice (glej sliko 1). Drugi primer je nemška proizvodnja avtomobilske opreme, ki je bila še posebej prizadeta na Spodnjem Saškem in v Severnem Porenju - Vestfaliji (glej sliko 2). Skupna odobrena pomoč ESPG v obdobju od 9. marca 2007 (datum prve vloge) do 31. decembra 2012 je znašala 627 milijonov EUR (379 milijonov EUR iz proračuna EU in 247 milijonov EUR od držav članic) za 89 odobrenih vlog4, pri čemer je letna proračunska zgornja meja za obdobje 2007–2013 500 milijonov EUR.
Picture 2 4 until 31 december 2012, Member states introduced 114 applications, out of which 10 were unsuccessful (one was rejected by the commission and nine withdrawn by the applicant Member state) and 15 were still under the EGf approval procedure. 
Slika 2 4 Države članice so do 31. decembra 2012 vložile 114 vlog, od katerih jih je bilo 10 neuspešnih (eno je zavrnila Komisija, devet pa so jih umaknile države članice prosilke), 15 pa jih je bilo še vedno v postopku odobritve ESPG.
5 under articles 1 and 10 of the EGf regulation, the EGf co-financing rate was 65 % for all applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to 31 december 2011. 
5 V skladu s členoma 1 in 10 Uredbe o ESPG je stopnja sofinanciranja za vse vloge, predložene od 1. maja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011, znašala 65 %.
Before and after that period, the co-financing rate was 50 %. 
Pred tem obdobjem in po njem je stopnja financiranja znašala 50 %.
6 coM(2011) 608 final of 6 october 2011. 
6 COM(2011) 608 final z dne 6. oktobra 2011.
8 One of the halls of the former Odense Steel Shipyard, now “Hall East”, Workers at the former Karmann production site in Osnabrück. a large 12 400 m2 production hall with 900-tonne crane capacity in Lindø Industrial Park, Munkebø, Denmark. 
8 Ena od hal nekdanje ladjedelnice Odense Steel Shipyard, sedaj „Hall Delavci pred nekdanjim proizvodnim obratom Karmann v mestu Osnabrück East“, 12 400 m2 velika proizvodna hala z žerjavom zmogljivosti 900 ton v industrijskem parku Lindø v mestu Munkebø na Danskem Posebno poročilo št.
Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? © Lindø Industrial Park A/S. © European Court of Auditors. 
7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU? © Lindø Industrial Park A/S © Evropsko računsko sodišče
9 audIt SCopE aNd approaCH 9. the overall objective of the audit was to assess the contribution made by the EGf, in the form of Eu added value, to enabling redundant workers to return to the labour market as soon as possible. the court examined in particular the following questions. (a) did all affected workers benefit from personalised EGf measures, and were EGf co-financed active labour market measures coordinated with other similar measures (i.e. Esf and Member state measures)? (b) Was the EGf effective in terms of labour market reintegration? (c) is the nature of the EGf measures likely to deliver Eu added value? (d) Was the EGf approval procedure implemented in a timely manner? 
Glavni cilj revizije je bil oceniti prispevek ESPG, in sicer ustvarjanje dodane vrednosti EU, k omogočanju čimprejšnje vrnitve presežnih delavcev na trg dela. Sodišče je preučilo zlasti naslednja vprašanja: (a) Ali so bili vsi prizadeti delavci deležni prilagojenih ukrepov ESPG in ali so bili aktivni ukrepi na trgu dela, ki so bili sofinancirani iz ESPG, usklajeni z drugimi podobnimi ukrepi (npr. z ukrepi ESS in držav članic)? (b) Ali je bil ESPG učinkovit pri ponovnem vključevanju na trg dela? (c) Ali je za ukrepe ESPG zaradi njihovih značilnosti verjetno, da bodo ustvarili dodano vrednost EU? (d) Ali se je postopek odobritve v okviru ESPG izvajal pravočasno?
Source: European commission. 
Vir: Evropska komisija.