natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Its operationalisation has been defined in the Note for the Alternates of the Economic and Financial Committee: ‘Improving the assessment of effective action in the context of the Excessive Deficit Procedure − a specification of the methodology’, of 12 June 2014. 
Njihova uveljavitev je bila opredeljena v dopisu namestnikom Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora: „Izboljšanje ocenjevanja uspešnih ukrepov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem–, specifikacija metodologije“, z dne 12. junija 2014.
62 The Commission recognizes that the concept of ‘unexpected adverse economic events’ has not been definitively set out in advance. 
62 Komisija priznava, da koncept „nepričakovanih neugodnih gospodarskih dogodkov“ ni bil dokončno opredeljen vnaprej.
However, the methodology for assessing effective action, as detailed in the note for the alternates of the Economic and Financial Committee: ‘Improving the assessment of effective action in the context of the Exces‐ sive Deficit Procedure − a specification of the methodology’, of 12 June 2014, made clear that lower growth than in the forecast underlying the EDP recommendation typically represents a case of an ‘unexpected adverse economic event’. 
Vendar je iz metodologije za ocenjevanje uspešnih ukrepov, kot je podrobno opisana v dopisu namestnikom Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora: „Izboljšanje ocenjevanja uspešnih ukrepov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem-, specifikacija metodologije“, z dne 12. junija 2014, jasno razvidno, da nižja rast od tiste v napovedi, na kateri temelji priporočilo v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, običajno pomeni primer „nepriča-kovanega neugodnega gospodarskega dogodka“.
Therefore, the Commission does not agree with the Court’s observation in relation to France1. 
Zato se Komisija ne strinja z opažanjem Sodišča v zvezi s Francijo1.
The Council opened the EDP for France on 27 April 2009 with an initial deadline in 2012. 
Svet je postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem za Francijo začel 27. aprila 2009 s prvotnim rokom leta 2012.
This deadline was extended to 2013 on 2 December 2009 and to 2015 on 21 June 2013 based on the finding that effective action had been taken but that unexpected adverse economic events with major unfavourable consequences for government finances had occurred. 
Ta rok je bil 2. decembra 2009 podaljšan na leto 2013 in 21. junija 2013 na leto 2015 na podlagi ugotovitve, da so bili sprejeti uspešni ukrepi, vendar je prišlo do nepričakovanih neugodnih gospodarskih dogodkov z večjimi negativnimi posledicami za javne finance.
The Commission applied the existing legal framework, as explained in the recommendations of 2009, 2013 and 2015, and the accompanying SWDs. 
Komisija je uporabila veljavni pravni okvir, kot je pojasnjeno v priporočilih iz let 2009, 2013 in 2015 ter v priloženih delovnih dokumentih služb Komisije.
Reply to the heading above paragraph 63 The Commission would like to stress that the basis for data quality assessment has greatly improved, given EDP data reporting by Member States has been greatly refined since 2005 and supplemented by detailed additional data. 
Odgovor na naslov pred točko 63 Komisija želi poudariti, da se je podlaga za oceno kakovosti podatkov močno izboljšala, saj je bilo poročanje podatkov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem s strani držav članic od leta 2005 zelo izpopolnjeno in dopolnjeno s podrobnimi dodatnimi podatki.
While the Commission agrees that there was traditionally a greater focus upon the deficit than the debt in the implementation of the SGP, the Commission underlines that gross government debt and its sustainability have always been taken into account as a relevant factor in the Reports under Article 126(3). 
Komisija se sicer strinja, da je bil pri izvajanju Pakta za stabilnost in rast tradicionalno večji poudarek namenjen primanjkljaju kot dolgu, vendar poudarja, da sta bila v poročilih iz člena 126(3) kot pomemben dejavnik vedno upoštevana bruto javni dolg in njegova vzdržnost.
Since the 2011 reform of the legislation known as ‘the Six‐pack’, there has been a much greater operational focus upon debt levels. 
Od reforme zakonodaje iz leta 2011, znane kot „šesterček“, obstaja veliko večja operativna osredotočenost na ravni dolga.
The breach of the debt threshold of 60% of GDP has been elevated to the trigger of the EDP and. the concept of debt diminishing at a satisfactory pace was operationalised through the debt‐reduction benchmark and is now assessed as part of the Commission’s regular monitoring of Member States’ fiscal positions. 
Kršitev praga dolga v višini 60 % BDP se je stopnjevala do ravni, ki pomeni sprožitev postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, koncept dovolj hitrega zmanjševanja dolga pa se je uveljavil z referenčnim merilom za zmanjšanje dolga in se zdaj ocenjuje kot del rednega spremljanja fiskalnega stanja držav članic s strani Komisije.
Reply of the Commission 115 64 Council Regulation 479/2009 provides the general framework for expressing reservations on the quality of the actual data and amending the actual data reported by Member States. 
Odgovori Komisije 115 64 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 479/2009 določa splošni okvir za izražanje pridržkov o kakovosti dejanskih podatkov in spreminjanje dejanskih podatkov, o katerih poročajo države članice.
According to this regulation, Eurostat may use such powers if there is evidence that the data reported by Member States do not comply with the accounting rules and, in particular, with the EDP methodology. 
V skladu s to uredbo lahko Eurostat uporabi taka pooblastila, če obstajajo dokazi, da podatki, o katerih poročajo države članice, niso skladni z računovodskimi pravili in zlasti z metodologijo postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
Reservations are expressed by Eurostat only in exceptional cases and are justified only under certain conditions. 
Eurostat pridržke izrazi samo izjemoma in jih utemelji samo pod določenimi pogoji.
Eurostat uses its professional judgement on this. 
Pri tem uporabi svojo strokovno presojo.
However, the lack of a specific reservation or amendment does not mean that there are no on‐going issues to be resolved with the Member State, but that Eurostat considers these issues to have no significant impact on Maastricht deficit and debt. 
Vendar neobstoj konkretnega pridržka ali spremembe ne pomeni, da ni tekočih vprašanj, ki jih je treba rešiti z državami članicami, temveč da po mnenju Eurostata ta vprašanja ne vplivajo pomembno na maastrichtski primanjkljaj in dolg.
The alternative would be to place reservations on all countries in every notification exercise, which would be disproportionate and would not serve the purpose of reservations. 
Druga možnost bi bila, da bi v vsakem obvestilu navedli pridržke za vse države, kar bi bilo nesorazmerno in ne bi ustrezalo namenu pridržkov.
In addition, it often happens that Member States adapt their data following questions raised by Eurostat during the clarification period. 
Poleg tega se pogosto zgodi, da države članice svoje podatke prilagodijo po vprašanjih, ki jih Eurostat postavi v času pojasnjevanja.
Such adaptations are not visible in the final press release as no reservation or amendment by Eurostat has been made. 
Take prilagoditve v končnem sporočilu za javnost niso vidne, saj Eurostat ni dal nobenega pridržka ali spremembe.
65 Eurostat has a procedure specifying the steps, timetable and role of each actor during the analysis of the notifica‐ tions prior to the press release. 
65 Eurostat ima postopek, v katerem so določeni koraki, časovni razpored in vloga vsakega akterja med analizo obvestil pred sporočilom za javnost.
This procedure includes regular meetings with senior management and with the Director General, acting as the Chief Statistician of the European Union. 
Ta postopek vključuje redne sestanke z višjim vodstvom in generalnim direktorjem, ki opravlja naloge glavnega statistika Evropske unije.
Reservations or amendments to the data are based on professional judgment, on the basis of the qualitative and quantitative information available before and during the clarification process, and they are reflected upon very carefully, as mentioned above. 
Pridržki in spremembe podatkov temeljijo na strokovni presoji na podlagi informacij o kakovosti in količini, ki so na voljo pred postopkom pojasnjevanja in med njim, ter so predmet skrbnega razmisleka, kot je bilo navedeno zgoraj.
This process is done on a statistical basis only, using the statistical authority provided to Eurostat for this purpose and without any interference from other Commission services or from any other exter‐ nal body. 
Ta postopek se izvaja izključno na statistični podlagi z uporabo statističnih pooblastil, ki jih ima Eurostat za ta namen in brez kakršnega koli poseganja drugih služb Komisije ali katerega koli drugega zunanjega telesa.
Subsequent revisions to the data have proved, as a matter of principle, that Eurostat’s approach for reservations is efficient and effective: ‘no big surprises’, i.e. when an issue was known but Eurostat decided that putting a reserva‐ tion was not warranted, no significant revisions to deficit or debt data were necessary. 
Naknadne spremembe podatkov so pokazale, da je Eurostatov pristop k pridržkom načeloma učinkovit in uspešen: „brez velikih presenečenj“, kar pomeni, da kadar je bilo neko vprašanje znano, vendar se je Eurostat odločil, da ni treba podati pridržka, niso bile potrebne znatne spremembe podatkov o primanjkljaju ali dolgu.
Box 5 Czech Republic – First indent Since 2010 the market/non‐market test is carried out each year for public non‐financial corporations and also for non‐profit institutions classified in S.15. 
Okvir 5 Češka, prva alinea Od leta 2010 se vsako leto opravi preizkus tržnosti/netržnosti za javne nefinančne družbe in nepridobitne institucije, razvrščene v S.15.
The results of the test are presented to Eurostat in the Questionnaire on government controlled entities classified outside general government or in a list of government units which is requested before the EDP dialogue visit. 
Rezultati preizkusa so Eurostatu predstavljeni v vprašalniku o državno nadziranih subjektih, razvrščenih zunaj sektorja država, ali na seznamu državnih enot, ki se zahteva pred obiskom za dialog v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
Reply of the Commission 116 France – First indent The treatment of decommissioning of nuclear facilities and possible related lump sum payments is still under discussion (even under ESA 2010). 
Odgovori Komisije 116 Francija, prva alinea Obravnava razgradnje jedrskih objektov in morebitna pavšalna plačila v zvezi s tem pa so še vedno predmet razprave (tudi v okviru ESR 2010).
Until an agreement is reached, there is currently no specific guidance for the treatment of nuclear decommissioning and related lump sum payments. 
Do sprejetja dogovora za zdaj ni posebnih smernic glede obravnave razgradnje jedrskih objektov in pavšalnih plačil v zvezi s tem.
France – Second indent Due to the very high number of government units in France (more than 80,000 units in S.13 and more than 8000 government controlled entities classified outside government), Eurostat has agreed with the grouping of units at local government level. 
Francija, druga alinea Zaradi velikega števila državnih enot v Franciji (več kot 80 000 enot v S.13 in več kot 8 000 državno nadziranih subjektov, razvrščenih zunaj sektorja država) se je Eurostat strinjal glede skupne obravnave enot na ravni lokalne oblasti.
Eurostat cannot set reservations on an issue for which there are no rules in the ESA or MGDD. 
Eurostat ne more podati pridržkov glede vprašanja, v zvezi s katerim ne obstajajo pravila v Evropskem sistemu računov ali Priročniku o javnofinančnem primanjkljaju in dolgu.
Germany – First indent No major, regular reclassifications of units with material impacts on government deficit and debt ratios (i.e. at close to or over 0.1% of GDP), occurred in the years 2011‐2013. 
Nemčija, prva alinea V letih 2011–2013 ni bilo nobenega pomembnega rednega prerazvrščanja enot s pomembnim vplivom na deleže javnofinančnega primanjkljaja in dolga (tj. blizu 0,1 % BDP ali več).
Hence, the size of related revisions would not have impacted on government deficit and debt ratios compiled for the purpose of the fiscal surveillance. 
Zato obseg zadevnih sprememb ne bi vplival na deleže javnofinančnega primanjkljaja in dolga, zbrane zaradi fiskalnega nadzora.
For all reclassifications undertaken in the context of: 1) one‐off methodological revisions, 2) the 2011 benchmark revision of the German national accounts and 3) changeover to the ESA 2010, for which impacts on government deficit and debt figures were substantial (at close to or over 0.1% of GDP) the data for the whole of the EDP refer‐ ence period was properly revised. 
Za vse prerazvrstitve v okviru: (1) enkratnih metodoloških sprememb, (2) spremembe referenčnega merila za nemške nacionalne račune leta 2011 in (3) prehoda na ESR 2010, pri katerih so bili vplivi na zneske javnofinančnega primanjkljaja in dolga znatni (blizu 0,1 % BDP ali več), so bili podatki za celotno referenčno obdobje postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem ustrezno spremenjeni.
Germany – Second indent The matter in question constitutes a risk to the data quality and, as provided for under Council Regulation 479/2009, once it had been identified it was addressed by Eurostat, taking stepwise approach given the complexity of the Ger‐ man statistical system and size of the German general government sector. 
Nemčija, druga alinea Obravnavana zadeva pomeni tveganje za kakovost podatkov, in ko je enkrat prepoznana, jo Eurostat v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 479/2009 začne obravnavati postopoma zaradi kompleksnosti nemškega statističnega sistema in velikosti nemškega sektorja država.
The Commission is not aware that the risk in question has materialised. 
Komisija ni seznanjena, da bi se zadevno tveganje uresničilo.
No related quality problems have been iden‐ tified by Eurostat on the basis of the data assessment. 
Eurostat ni ugotovil nobenih težav glede kakovosti v zvezi s tem na podlagi ocene podatkov.
Within the complex statistical system in Germany, legal mandate underpinning the regular collection of statistical data collection, and limited resources, the process of implementation of relevant procedures for outstanding – small in terms of size – individual operations at state and local level requires a structural solution. 
Glede na kompleksen statistični sistem v Nemčiji, pravni mandat, na katerem temelji redno zbiranje statističnih podatkov, in omejene vire zahteva postopek izvajanja zadevnih postopkov za nerešene (po velikosti majhne) posamezne operacije na državni in lokalni ravni strukturne rešitve.
Given the size of the transactions and the fact that no conclusions about the outcome of the analysis can be drawn at this stage, the Commission does not consider that a reservation on these grounds should have been put on the German deficit data. 
Glede na velikost transakcij in dejstvo, da na tej stopnji ni mogoče sklepati o rezultatih analize, Komisija meni, da na nemške podatke o primanjkljaju na tej podlagi ni treba podati pridržka.
Malta – First indent The novation agreement to transfer the legal ownership of the project to Malita was signed on 28 December 2011 (amended in February 2012) and thus after the October 2011 EDP notification. 
Malta, prva alinea Pogodba o novaciji za prenos pravnega lastništva projekta na družbo Malita je bila podpisana 28. decembra 2011 (spremenjena februarja 2012) in torej po obvestilu o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem iz oktobra 2011.
Likewise, the leasing arrangements were signed on 26 June 2012, also well after the October 2011 EDP Notification. 
Prav tako je bil dogovor o najemu podpisan 26. junija 2012, kar je bilo prav tako po obvestilu o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem iz oktobra 2011.
In the April 2012 EDP notification, the Maltese National Statistical Office had correctly treated all relevant points. 
V obvestilu o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem iz aprila 2012 je malteški nacionalni statistični urad ustrezno obravnaval vse zadevne točke.
In its letter of August 2012, Eurostat confirmed after thorough analysis that Malita should be classified within the non‐financial corporations sector. 
Eurostat je v pismu iz avgusta 2012 po temeljiti analizi potrdil, da je treba družbo Malita uvrstiti v sektor nefinančnih družb.
Therefore the Commission considers that no reservation was necessary. 
Komisija zato meni, da ni bil potreben pridržek.
Reply of the Commission 117 Italy – First indent The Commission (Eurostat) has been following progress on this issue closely. 
Odgovori Komisije 117 Italija, prva alinea Komisija (Eurostat) skrbno spremlja napredek pri tem vprašanju.
A step by step approach, including set‐ ting up of new data sources and making estimates, has been implemented by Italy. 
Italija uporablja postopni pristop, vključno z vzpostavljanjem novih virov podatkov in ocenjevanjem.
Box 6 The Court refers to the basic macroeconomic assumptions underlying the deficit and debt thresholds stipulated in the Treaty. 
Okvir 6 Sodišče se sklicuje na osnovne makroekonomske predpostavke, na katerih temeljijo pragi primanjkljaja in dolga, določeni v Pogodbi.
While the macroeconomic environment is subject to change, the Commission remains obliged to operate as per the provisions of the Treaty and the secondary legislation which supports it. 
Medtem ko se makroekonomsko okolje spreminja, Komisija ostaja zavezana delovanju v skladu z določbami Pogodbe in sekundarne zakonodaje, ki jo podpira.
The overall fiscal framework has evolved significantly, not least due to the reforms introduced through the Six‐pack and the Two‐pack in recent years, with the goal of delivering ‘smart rules’ that allow to react to and accommodate better the prevailing economic realities. 
Splošni fiskalni okvir se je znatno spremenil, ne nazadnje tudi zaradi reform, uvedenih s šesterčkom in dvojčkom v zadnjih letih, pri čemer je bil cilj oblikovati „pametna pravila“, ki omogočajo boljše odzivanje na prevladujoče gospodarsko stanje in prilagajanje temu stanju.
While there was traditionally a greater focus upon the deficit than the debt in the implementation of the SGP, the Commission underlines that the framework has consistently addressed the issue of debt. 
Pri izvajanju Pakta za stabilnost in rast je bil sicer tradicionalno večji poudarek namenjen primanjkljaju kot dolgu, vendar Komisija poudarja, da je bilo v tem okviru dosledno obravnavano vprašanje dolga.
In particular, it should be recalled that the component of the Medium‐Term Budgetary Objective related to implicit liabilities and debt (MTOILD) has a built‐in element representing the budgetary balance that would stabilise the debt ratio at 60% of GDP and a complementary component representing the additional budgetary balance necessary for countries with debt exceeding 60% of GDP. 
Zlasti je treba spomniti, da ima sestavina srednjeročnega proračunskega cilja v zvezi z implicitnimi obveznostmi in dolgom (MTOILD) vgrajen element, ki predstavlja proračunski saldo, ki bi stabiliziral delež dolga pri 60 % BDP, in dopolnilni element, ki predstavlja dodatni proračunski saldo, potreben za države, katerih dolg presega 60 % BDP.
The breach of the debt threshold of 60% of GDP has been elevated to the trigger of the EDP and the concept of debt diminishing at a satisfactory pace was operationalised through the debt‐reduction benchmark and is now assessed as part of the Commission’s regular monitoring of Member States’ fiscal positions. 
Kršitev praga dolga v višini 60 % BDP se je stopnjevala do ravni, ki pomeni sprožitev postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, koncept dovolj hitrega zmanjševanja dolga pa se je uveljavil z referenčnim merilom za zmanjšanje dolga in se zdaj ocenjuje kot del rednega spremljanja fiskalnega stanja držav članic s strani Komisije.
70 The Commission points out that the initial level of debt enters into the definition of the debt‐reduction benchmark through the differential to the 60% threshold. 
70 Komisija opozarja, da začetna raven dolga ustreza opredelitvi referenčnega merila za zmanjšanje dolga na podlagi razlike do 60-odstotnega praga.
For Member States with debt above 60% of GDP, the recommended adjustment path has to take into account the need for the debt to comply at least with the forward‐looking debt benchmark at the end of the correction period. 
Pri državah članicah, katerih dolg je večji od 60 % BDP, je treba pri priporočenem načinu prilagoditve upoštevati, da mora dolg izpolnjevati vsaj v prihodnost usmerjeno referenčno merilo dolga ob koncu obdobja odprave.
As a result, the level of the deficit recommended for the final year may be below 3% of GDP and, in case of heavily indebted Member States, the deadline for correction may be longer as the magnitude of the structural adjustment to be delivered needs to be weighed against its feasibility under a certain number of years. 
Zato je lahko raven primanjkljaja, priporočena za končno leto, pod 3 % BDP, rok za odpravo pa je lahko pri zelo zadolženih državah članicah daljši, saj je treba obseg strukturne prilagoditve tehtati glede na njeno izvedljivost v določenem številu let.
The fact that, in order to meet the debt benchmark, the public deficit must be brought below 3% of GDP has been reflected in the EDP recommendations issued so far based on breach of the debt criterion. 
Dejstvo, da je treba za izpolnitev referenčnega merila dolga javnofinančni primanjkljaj zmanjšati pod 3 % BDP, je upoštevano v priporočilih o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki so bila do zdaj izdana na podlagi kršitve merila dolga.
71 The Commission notes that the projections quoted are on an unchanged‐policy basis. 
71 Komisija opozarja, da navedene projekcije temeljijo na nespremenjeni politiki.
Specifically under a scenario of full compliance with the SGP, Italy would respect the debt reduction benchmark (forward looking variant) by 2019 and France by 2018. 
Konkretno bi Italija po scenariju popolne skladnosti s Paktom za stabilnost in rast upoštevala referenčno merilo za zmanjšanje dolga (v prihodnost usmerjena različica) do leta 2019, Francija pa do leta 2018.
The IMF data used for Cyprus present a significant discrep‐ ancy with those used by the Commission. 
Podatki MDS, uporabljeni za Ciper, znatno odstopajo od tistih, ki jih je uporabila Komisija.
Reply of the Commission 118 72 The analysis of relevant factors is conducted in line with the requirements of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97. 
Odgovori Komisije 118 72 Analiza pomembnih dejavnikov se izvaja v skladu z zahtevami Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97.
The legislation indeed provides a broad list of possible relevant factors which is not exhaustive, since it requires the Commission to also consider factors deemed relevant by the Member State concerned. 
V zakonodaji je dejansko določen širok seznam mogočih pomembnih dejavnikov, ki ni izčrpen, saj mora Komisija upoštevati tudi dejavnike, ki jih zadevna država članica šteje za pomembne.
The Commission specifies and to the extent possible quantifies the effect of the different relevant factors. 
Komisija navede in, kolikor je to mogoče, količinsko opredeli učinek različnih pomembnih dejavnikov.
There is no formula weighting all the different factors which leads to an automatic conclusion. 
Ni formule, po kateri bi lahko pretehtali vse različne dejavnike in ki bi vodila do samodejnega zaključka.
The Commission publishes its detailed analysis in the Staff Working Documents. 
Komisija svojo podrobno analizo objavi v delovnih dokumentih služb Komisije.
73 The Commission does not agree with the assertion that the reasoning behind its conclusions is unclear. 
73 Komisija se ne strinja s trditvijo, da so razlogi za ugotovitve nejasni.