natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4.2.2005 Box 1 If, for some animals, the identification and registration requirements are not fully complied with, a restriction is imposed on the movement of those animals until the requirements have been fully complied with. 
Okvirček št. 1 Če za nekatere živali zahteve v zvezi z identifikacijo in registracijo niso izpolnjene v celoti, se za te živali uvede omejitev gibanja, dokler zahteve niso v celoti izpolnjene.
If the number of animals for which the identification and registration requirements are not fully complied with is in excess of 20 % of the herd, a restriction is imposed on the movement of all the animals present on the holding. 
Če je število živali, za katere zahteve v zvezi z identifikacijo in registracijo niso izpolnjene v celoti, večje od 20 % staleža, se omejitev glede premikov uvede za vse živali, prisotne na gospodarstvu.
If a keeper fails to report movements, births or deaths, a restriction on movement of animals to and from that holding is imposed. 
Če imetnik ne poroča o premikih, skotitvah ali poginih, se prav tako uvedejo omejitve glede premikov na zadevno gospodarstvo in z njega.
If one or more animals on a holding comply with none of the identification and registration provisions laid down, a restriction is imposed on movement of all animals to and from that holding. 
Če ena ali več živali ne izpolnjujejo nobene določbe v zvezi z identifikacijo in registracijo, se omejitev uvede za premike vseh živali na zadevno gospodarstvo in z njega.
If the keeper of an animal cannot prove its identity within two working days, the animal must be destroyed without delay under the supervision of the veterinary authorities and without compensation. 
Če imetnik živali njene identitete ne more dokazati v dveh delovnih dneh, mora žival pod nadzorom veterinarskih organov nemudoma pokončati, in to brez nadomestila.
The Member States with computerised databases which the Commission has deemed to be fully operational may decide to discontinue issuing passports for movements of cattle within the Member State concerned; in this case, only cattle intended for intra-Community trade are required to have a passport containing data based on the computerised database (5). 
Države članice, ki imajo računalniško podatkovno bazo, za katero je Komisija ocenila, da je popolnoma operativna, se lahko odločijo, da ne bodo več izdajale potnih listov za premike govedi v državi članici. V tem primeru morajo potni list, ki vsebujejo podatke iz računalniške podatkovne baze (5), imeti samo goveda, namenjena za trgovino med državami članicami.
The Member States may also reduce the rate of on-the-spot checks from 10 to 5 % (6), if they have a fully operational database which enables them to carry out effective cross-checks. 
Države članice lahko tudi znižajo raven kontrol na kraju samem z 10 na 5 % (6), če je njihova podatkovna baza popolnoma operativna, kar jim omogoča izvedbo učinkovitih navzkrižnih preverjanj.
ROLES AND LEGAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE VARIOUS PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE REGISTRATION SYSTEM CATTLE IDENTIFICATION AND The Council and the European Parliament 27. 
VLOGA IN PRAVNE OBVEZNOSTI POGODBENIC, KI SODELUJEJO PRI SISTEMU IDENTIFIKACIJE IN REGISTRACIJE GOVEDA Svet EU in Evropski parlament 27.
In respect of the protection of human health (7), the Council and the European Parliament adopt the basic regulations following a proposal by the Commission. 
V zvezi zdravstvenim varstvom ljudi (7) Svet EU in Evropski parlament na predlog Komisije sprejmeta osnovne predpise.
In the case of agriculture, the Council adopts regulations and directives proposed by the Commission after consultation with the European Parliament. 
Na kmetijskem področju sprejme Svet EU uredbe ali direktive, ki jih predlaga Komisija, po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
(5) Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. 
(5) Člen 6(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000.
(6) Article 2(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2630/97. 
(6) Člen 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2630/97.
(7) Article 152(4)(b) of the Treaty establishing the European Community. 
(7) Člen 152(4)(b) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/13 The Commission 28. 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 29/13 Komisija 28.
Basic Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 (1) stipulates that the Commission is to be assisted by a management committee made up of representatives of the Member States (EAGGF Committee (2)) when taking the necessary measures to implement the system and, in particular, the provisions concerning ear tags, passports and registers, the minimum checks to be carried out, the application of administrative sanctions and the transitional arrangements. 
1760/2000 je določeno (1), da Komisiji pri sprejemanju potrebnih ukrepov za izvajanje sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda ter zlasti določb v zvezi z ušes-nimi znamkami, potnim listom in registrom, minimalnim številom kontrol, ki jih je treba izvesti, uporabo administrativnih kazni ter prehodnih ukrepov pomaga upravljalni odbor, sestavljen iz predstavnikov držav članic (Odbor Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (2)).
In addition, the basic regulation (3) also specifies that the CommissionŐs experts, together with the competent authorities, must, on the one hand, verify that the Member States comply with the legislation and, on the other, carry out on-the-spot checks in order to verify that controls are implemented in conformity with the rules in force. 
Poleg tega osnovna uredba (3) določa, da morajo izvedenci Komisije skupaj s pristojnimi organi na eni strani preveriti, ali države članice ravnajo v skladu z zakonodajo in, na drugi strani, ali izvajajo kontrole na kraju samem za zagotovitev, da se pregledi izvajajo v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo.
Within this framework, the Commission is assisted by the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health (4). 
Pri tem Komisiji pomaga Stalni odbor za prehransko verigo in zdravstveno varstvo živali (4).
Where the Commission deems it appropriate, in view of the findings arising from the checks, the situation is reviewed by the committee. 
Kadar Komisija meni, da je to ustrezno z vidika rezultatov pregledov, preuči razmere v okviru tega odbora.
The Commission may adopt the necessary decisions. 
Sprejme lahko potrebne odločitve.
The Regulation also stipulates that the Commission is to monitor developments in the situation and may, where necessary, amend or repeal decisions. 
Določeno je tudi, da mora Komisija spremljati razvoj teh razmer in po potrebi spremeniti ali preklicati odločitve.
The Member States 29. 
Države članice 29.
It is the responsibility of each Member State to set up a system for identifying and registering cattle in accordance with the provisions of legislation. 
Vsaka država članica je zadolžena, da vzpostavi sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda v skladu z zakonodajnimi določbami.
The Member States define and administer the ear tags, define the format of the farm registers and issue the animal passports. 
Države članice opredelijo in upravljajo ušesne znamke, opredelijo obliko registrov gospodarstva ter izdajo potne liste za goveda.
The Member States lay down the procedures for declaring cattle movements in order to keep their national databases up to date. 
Države članice določijo postopke za poročanje o premikih goved, da lahko posodobijo svoje nacionalne podatkovne baze.
These procedures are either manual (report forms) or automated (transfer of files, Internet connection, etc). 
Ti postopki so ročni (obrazci za prijavo) ali avtomatski (prenos datotek, internetna povezava itd.).
The Member States are also obliged to carry out checks on keepers of cattle and to draw up an annual report on the findings of these checks. 
Države članice morajo prav tako izvesti preglede pri imetnikih goveda in sestaviti letno poročilo o rezultatih pregledov.
This report must be submitted to the Commission. 
To poročilo morajo poslati Komisiji.
(1) Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. 
(1) Člen 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000.
(2) The committee referred to in Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 
(2) Odbor, predviden v členu 11 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1258/1999 (UL L 160, 26.6.1999, str.
(3) Articles 22 and 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. 
(3) Člena 22 in 23 Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000.
(4) The committee referred to in Article 62(2) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 
(4) Odbor, predviden v členu 62(2) Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 178/2002 (UL L 31, 1.2.2002, str.
The various keepers of cattle 32. 
Različni imetniki goveda 32.
In relation to cattle, ÔkeeperŐ means any natural or legal person responsible for the animals, whether on a permanent or on a temporary basis, including during transport or at a market. 
Imetnik goveda je vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, ki je stalno ali začasno odgovorna za živali, tudi med prevozom ali na trgu.
With the exception of transporters, every keeper must report to the competent authority all movements to and from the holding and all births and deaths. 
Razen prevoznikov mora vsak imetnik pristojnemu organu prijaviti vse vstope in izstope ter vse skotitve in pogine.
Keepers must also maintain an up-to-date register, make entries in the passports, attach ear tags at birth and retag if the tags are lost (5). 
Imetniki morajo voditi tudi redno posodabljan register, izpolnjevati potne liste in ob skotitvi pritrditi ušesne znamke in jih nadomestiti, če se izgubijo (5).
The legislative system adopted in respect of cattle identification and registration must be appropriate to the objectives to be achieved. 
Sprejeta zakonodajna ureditev v zvezi z identifikacijo in registracijo goveda mora biti v skladu z zastavljenimi cilji.
If the objective is to be able to track all cattle movements on the territory of the European Union, the legislative framework must be appropriate to this objective. 
Če je cilj omogočiti sledenje vsem premikom goveda na ozemlju Evropske unije, mu mora biti prilagojena zakonodajna ureditev.
The basic legislation governing the identification and registration of cattle is drafted in general terms and leaves the responsibility for setting up the system, on their own territory, to the Member States. 
Osnovna uredba v zvezi z identifikacijo in registracijo goveda je splošna ter pušča državam članicam pristojnost za vzpostavitev sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda na njihovem ozemlju.
The Commission has adopted implementing measures in respect of ear tags, passports, registers, controls (6) and penalties (7), but not in respect of the computerised databases. 
Komisija je sprejela ukrepe za uporabo ušesnih znamk, potnih listov, registrov, kontrol (6) in kazni (7), vendar ne za računalniške podatkovne baze.
Legislation makes no provision for exchanges of information between the databases 35. 
V zakonodaji niso določeni predpisi za izmenjavo podatkov med različnimi podatkovnimi bazami 35.
Community legislation sets out the measures required for veterinary and zootechnical checks. 
Zakonodaja Skupnosti določa ukrepe, ki so potrebni za veterinarske in zootehnične preglede.
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 requires Member States to take the necessary (5) Articles 2 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. 
1760/2000 zahteva, da države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so (5) Člena 2 in 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000.
(6) Commission Regulations (EC) No 2629/97 (OJ L 354, 30.12.1997, p. 
(6) Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 2629/97 (UL L 354, 30.12.1997, str.
19) and (EC) No 2630/97, codified by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003 (OJ L 156, 25.6.2003, p. 
19) in (ES) št. 2630/97, kodificirani z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1082/2003 (UL L 156, 25.6.2003, str.
(7) Regulation (EC) No 494/98. 
(7) Uredba (ES) št. 494/98.
C 29/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 measures to ensure that the national computerised databases are fully operational as soon as possible. 
C 29/14 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.2.2005 potrebni za čimprejšnjo popolno operativnost nacionalnih računalniških podatkovnih baz.
Since it was aware of the risks and realised that, in order to be able to track animals and animal movements, it was necessary to introduce a transparent procedure for the exchange of data between Member States on animals and animal movements, the Commission drew up a proposal to this effect. 
Ker se je Komisija zavedala posledic in je ugotovila, da mora za izsledljivost živali vzpostaviti pregleden sistem za izmenjavo podatkov o živalih in njihovih premikih med državami članicami, je v ta namen pripravila predlog.
The Council did not follow up this proposal. 
Svet pa temu predlogu ni sledil.
Legislation adopted in July 2000 makes no provision for exchanges of data between the various national databases, only for mutual assistance procedures between Member States. 
Uredba, sprejeta julija 2000, ne določa izmenjave podatkov med različnimi nacionalnimi podatkovnimi bazami, ampak samo postopke za medsebojno pomoč med državami članicami.
The ANIMO system allows information to be communicated between Member States in respect of batches of animals traded, but does not provide information on the identity of the animals making up the batches. 
Sistem ANIMO omogoča pošiljanje informacij med državami članicami o serijah živali, s katerimi se trguje, vendar pa ta sistem ne omogoča pridobivanja informacij o identiteti živali, vključenih v te serije.
As a result there is no systematic communication between Member States concerning the state of health of the animals traded or their eligibility for premiums. 
Zato ni nobene sistematične komunikacije med državami članicami o zdravstvenem stanju živali, s katerimi se trguje, ali njihovi upravičenosti do premij.
At any rate, the exchange of data between the various national databases was compromised from the outset because the format of the data differs from one Member State to another. 
Vsekakor pa je bila izmenjava informacij med različnimi nacionalnimi podatkovnimi bazami kočljiva že od samega začetka, saj se formati podatkov po državah razlikujejo.
In the absence of a mechanism for exchanging data between databases, it is possible to monitor cattle movements by verifying whether the passports of traded animals are returned. 
Ker ni mehanizma za izmenjavo podatkov med podatkovnimi bazami, se spremljanje tokov goveda lahko zagotovi samo s preverjanjem vračanja potnih listov živali, s katerimi se trguje.
However, the passport return mechanism does not work (see paragraph 38(c)). 
Vendar pa ta mehanizem vračanja potnih listov ne deluje (glej odstavek 38(c)).
At present the Commission has no detailed description of the monitoring of movements overall, nor any study of how it works in the context of the identification and registration system. 
Komisija trenutno nima na voljo nobenega podrobnega opisa spremljanja vseh tokov niti nobene študije, ki bi analizirala njegovo delovanje v okviru sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda.
In the absence of any exchange of data between national databases, the only assurance it can give is that the system allows effective monitoring, at least in theory, of all movements of cattle on Community territory. 
Ker ni izmenjave podatkov med nacionalnimi bazami, lahko Komisija zagotavlja samo, da bo sistem, vsaj teoretično, omogočal učinkovito spremljanje vseh premikov goveda na ozemlju Skupnosti.
Community legislation is not sufficiently precise 38. 
Zakonodaja Skupnosti ni dovolj natančna 38.
The current legislation has a number of imprecisions and inconsistencies, which give rise to different ways of processing the data, depending on the Member State, and may even be sources of errors. (a) KeepersŐ obligations concerning registers have not been adapted to meet the requirements of the different types of keeper All keepers of cattle, with the exception of transporters, must keep an up-to-date register, manually or by computer, containing certain obligatory items of information. 
Veljavna zakonodaja je na določenih delih nenatančna ali neskladna, kar je vir različnih načinov obdelave podatkov glede na državo članico ter celo vir napak. (a) Obveznosti imetnikov živali v zvezi vodenjem registrov niso prilagojene Vsi imetniki goveda, razen prevoznikov, morajo ročno ali računalniško voditi redno posodabljan register, v katerem so navedene nekatere obvezne postavke.
The keeping of this register has not been adapted to the requirements of the different keepersŐ activities. 
Vodenje registra ni prilagojeno značilnostim dejavnosti različnih imetnikov živali.
It ought to be possible to take into consideration the characteristics which are specific to certain categories of keeper, such as traders, assembly centres, or slaughterhouses (1). 
Treba bi bilo omogočiti upoštevanje značilnosti določenih kategorij imetnikov, kot so trgovci, zbirni centri ali klavnice (1).
In view of the large number of movements involved, it is not possible for a trader or the manager of an assembly centre to enter the information relating to the individual identification of all animals in a traditional register. 
Tako zaradi veliko premikov trgovec ali vodja zbirnega centra v klasičen register ne moreta vpisati informacij o posamezni identifikaciji vseh živali.
The professional practices of these keepers are not compatible with the current requirements concerning the keeping of registers. 
Poklicne prakse teh imetnikov niso združljive s trenutnimi zahtevami glede vodenja registra.
Similar constraints exist at slaughterhouse level. (b) The term Ôkeeper of bovine animalsŐ is interpreted in different ways The legislation has defined a keeper as any natural or legal person responsible for the animals, whether on a permanent or temporary basis, including during transportation or at a market. 
Podobne omejitve obstajajo tudi na ravni klavnic. (b) Pojem imetnika goveda se razlaga različno Zakonodaja je imetnika goveda opredelila kot vsako fizično ali pravno osebo, ki je trajno ali začasno odgovorna za žival, tudi med prevozom ali na trgu.
The aim of this broad definition is to include all the categories of person who take charge of cattle from an animalŐs birth or entry into the European Union until its death or exit from the European Union. 
Cilj te široke opredelitve pojma je vključiti vse kategorije nosilcev dejavnosti, ki so za goveda zadolženi od njihove skotitve ali vstopa v Evropsko unijo do njihovega pogina ali izstopa iz Evropske unije.
The Member States have sometimes interpreted the term ÔkeeperŐ in different ways. 
Države članice so si pojem imetnika včasih razlagale različno.
France has included assembly centres and knackersŐ yards in its cattle identification and registration system. 
Francija je v sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda vključila zbirne centre in obrate za zbiranje živalskih trupel.
This is not the case in the three other Member States visited. (c) The passports of dead animals and of animals exported to another Member State, for which new passports are issued, are not always invalidated In the Member States visited, passports are required for all movements of cattle. 
V treh drugih obiskanih državah članicah ni bilo tako. (c) Potni listi mrtvih živali ali živali, poslanih v drugo državo članico, za katere se je izdal nov potni list, se ne razveljavijo vedno V obiskanih državah članicah se potni list uporablja za vse premike goveda.
The legislation stipulates that when an animal dies, the passport must be returned by the keeper to the competent authority at the latest seven days after the animalŐs death. 
Zakonodaja določa, da mora imetnik pri poginu živali potni list pristojnemu organu vrniti najpozneje v sedmih dneh po poginu živali.
If the animal is sent to a slaughterhouse, the manager of the slaughterhouse is responsible for returning the passport to the competent authority. 
Če se žival pošlje v klavnico, je za vrnitev potnega lista pristojnemu organu odgovoren vodja klavnice.
The mechanisms for returning passports are either non-existent or ineffective. 
Mehanizmi vračanja potnih listov bodisi ne obstajajo bodisi so neučinkoviti.
(1) The number of movements recorded by traders and assembly centres is so large that the register, which must be kept manually, is a source of error. 
Določila se niso nobena (1) Premikov, ki so jih zabeležili trgovci ali zbirni centri, je toliko, da je register, ki ga je treba voditi ročno, vir napak.
The number of animals present cannot be calculated automatically and the completeness of the entries must be verified (provision must be made for cross-checks). 
Število prisotnih živali se ne more izračunati samodejno in zagotoviti je treba izčrpnost vpisov (predvideti je treba navzkrižna preverjanja).
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/15 (d) Detailed implementing rules governing the return of passports and checks on the returns have not been specified. 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 29/15 (d) podrobna izvedbena pravila za vračanje potnih listov in nadzor nad tem vračanjem.
In addition, no procedure for invalidating these passports has been laid down. 
Poleg tega ni uveden noben postopek za razveljavitev teh potnih listov.
In the absence of systematic exchanges of information between Member States and in view of the lack of precision in the legislation, at the level of procedures, checks and sanctions, passports which have not been invalidated could be reused in an irregular manner. 
Nerazveljavljeni potni listi se lahko nepravilno ponovno uporabijo, ker ni sistematične izmenjave podatkov med državami članicami in ker zakonodaja ni dovolj natančna tako glede postopkov kot pregledov ter morebitnih kazni.
In the case of cattle from another Member State, if the passport is not reissued in the Member States of destination, there is no procedure for returning information on the animals included in the national databases. 
Za goveda s poreklom iz drugih držav članic ni določen noben postopek vračanja informacij o govedu, vključenem v nacionalne podatkovne baze, če se potni list ponovno ne izda v namembni državi članici.
Furthermore, if a passport is reissued, the procedures for returning the old passport to the Member State in which it was issued are either non-existent or ineffective. 
Poleg tega pa pri ponovni izdaji potnega lista ne obstajajo nobeni postopki glede vračanja starega potnega lista v državo članico izdajateljico ali pa so neučinkoviti.
It is sometimes difficult to establish a link with the country or holding of origin. 
Včasih je težko vzpostaviti povezavo z izvorno državo ali gospodarstvom.
For animals from third countries, the system in place is based on the cattle being identified on the first holding of destination and thus on ÔnaturalisationŐ on entry, which does not always allow a link to be established with the country or holding of origin. (b) The length of the cattle identification numbers varies (two letters identifying the Member State followed by a maximum of 12 digits) With regard to trade in cattle, the non-standardisation of ear-tag codes causes administrative problems for a number of Member States. 
Za živali iz tretjih držav temelji vzpostavljeni sistem na identifikaciji goveda na prvem namembnem gospodarstvu in tako na „naturalizaciji“ ob vstopu, kar pa včasih ne omogoča vzpostavitve povezave z izvorno državo ali gospodarstvom. (b) Dolžina identifikacijskih številk za govedo se razlikuje (2 črki za označbo države članice, ki jima sledi največ dvanajstmestna koda) (d) Pomanjkanje standardizacije kod, ki so na ušesnih znam-kah, številnim državam članicam povzroča administrativne težave pri trgovini z govedom.
France, for example, which only uses 10 dig-its, creates virtual numbers to allow inclusion, in the database, of animals from other Member States. 
Na primer Francija, ki uporablja samo desetmestne številčne oznake, ustvarja navidezne številke, da lahko v podatkovno bazo vnese živali s poreklom iz drugih držav članic.
Greater standardisation of identification numbers would have made it possible for movements of cattle between Member States to be registered automatically. 
Večja standardizacija identifikacijskih številk bi morala omogočati avtomatsko beleženje premikov goveda med državami članicami.