natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
65. one aspect highlighted is the inability of small ngos to ensure the conservation of the project results due to a lack of own financial resources. in one case, it was found that the only source of revenue was the life grant (including the complementary national financial contribution) and, in another case revenue was basically limited to public grants to ongoing projects. 
65. poudarjeno je bilo, da majhne nevladne organizacije zaradi pomanjkanja lastnih finančnih sredstev ne zmorejo zagotavljati trajnosti rezultatov projektov. v enem primeru, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila donacija LIFe (vključno z dodatnim nacionalnim finančnim prispevkom) edini vir prihodkov, v drugem primeru pa so bili prihodki v bistvu omejeni na javne donacije za tekoče projekte.
This means that the risks to the project are very high once eu financing ceases. mAnAGement PLAns Are imPortAnt As they orGAnise And commit the Authorities, ensurinG thAt the Project resuLts Are LAstinG S o u r c e : european Court of auditors. 
To pomeni, da so tveganja za obstoj projekta, po tem ko ga eu preneha financirati, velika. načrtI UPraVljanja sO POmembnI, saj se PrIstOjnI OrganI z njImI OrganIzIrajO In zaVežejO k zagOtaVljanjU trajnOstI rezUltatOV PrOjektOV V i r : evropsko računsko sodišče.
35 special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
35 posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
32 projects audited include the preparation of management plans (see Annex III). such management plans are important as they organise and commit the authorities to ensuring that the project results are lasting. if approved by the member state, they commit national authorities to allocating the sites concerned to a permanent structure (organisational and financial) responsible for assuring continuity of the projects’ results. 
32 revidiranih projektov zajema pripravo načrtov upravljanja (glej Prilogo III). Takšni načrti upravljanja so pomembni, saj se pristojni organi z njimi organizirajo in zavežejo k zagotavljanju trajnosti rezultatov projektov. Če države članice te načrte upravljanja odobrijo, so nacionalni organi dolžni zagotoviti, da se zadevna območja dodelijo stalni strukturi (organizacijski in finančni), odgovorni za zagotavljanje kontinuitete rezultatov projektov. vendar ti načrti na splošno niso bili odobreni in komisija ob postopnem ukinjanju financiranja iz LIFe ni sistematično nadalje spremljala njihovega izvajanja.
The member states have not approved the management plans for all the relevant project sites (e.g. five projects in belgium and four projects in slovenia). as a consequence, an important basis for the on-going management of the sites concerned has not been established. finally, beneficiaries faced difficulties in seeking co-financing for on-going management contracts under agri-environmental measures (see Box 9). 
Države članice načrtov upravljanja niso odobrile za vsa relevantna območja pri projektih (npr. pri petih projektih v Belgiji in štirih v sloveniji). posledično ni bila vzpostavljena pomembna osnova za tekoče upravljanje zadevnih območij, upravičenci pa so imeli na koncu težave pri iskanju sofinanciranja za tekoče pogodbe o upravljanju pri kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepih (glej okvir 9).
36 box 9 no finAncinG Assured After the Project end one of the main objectives of a project audited which received more than 1 million euro of eu contribution, was to develop an integrated management approach for the targeted natura 2000 site, with the establishment of agreements with farmers to implement various types of management measures to protect the targeted species. The experiences gained would then be used to define agri-environmental measures to protect the targeted species and to define agri-environmental measures to be used for similar cases. agreements were reached with farmers and financial compensation was allocated for the project period. however, no information was available in respect of the concrete development of subsequent agri-environmental measures by local farmers. 
36 OkVIr 9 FInancIranje PO zakljUčkU PrOjekta nI zagOtOVljenO eden od glavnih ciljev revidiranega projekta, za katerega je eu prispevala več kot 1 milijon eur, je bil izdelati integriran pristop za upravljanje ciljnega območja natura 2000, pri čemer bi se s kmeti sklenili sporazumi o izvajanju različnih vrst upravljavskih ukrepov za zaščito ciljnih vrst. pridobljene izkušnje bi se nato uporabile za opredelitev kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov za zaščito ciljnih vrst in za opredelitev kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov, ki bi se izvedli v podobnih primerih. s kmeti so bili sklenjeni sporazumi, za obdobje trajanja projekta pa je bilo dodeljeno finančno nadomestilo. vendar ni bilo na voljo nobenih informacij o tem, ali so lokalni kmetje pozneje dejansko pripravili kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe.
Consequently, there is no reasonable guarantee that the results achieved by the project will be continued, including the dissemination of the lessons learned and, therefore, information on its effectiveness. special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
Zato ni primernega jamstva, da se bodo pri projektu doseženi rezultati nadaljevali, vključno z razširjanjem pridobljenih izkušenj ter tako tudi informacij o njegovi uspešnosti. posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
37 ConClusions and reCommendaTions 68. life-nature grants contribute to the biodiversity conservation effort by enhancing the eu member states’ actions and by supporting the commitment of many citizens and their associations in favour of the preservation of species and habitats. 
37 ZakLjuČkI In prIporoČILa 68. Donacije LIFe-narava prispevajo k prizadevanjem za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti tako, da krepijo dejavnosti držav članic eu in podpirajo številne državljane in njihova združenja, ki si prizadevajo za ohranjanje vrst in habitatov.
69. life-nature is complex: projects deal with many different realities, are promoted by various types of beneficiaries and should have a sustainable impact on specific species and habitats, including through the dissemination of the results achieved and the lessons learned. 
69. Instrument Life-narava je zapleten: razmere pri projektih so zelo različne, projekte vodijo raznovrstni upravičenci, projekti sami pa bi morali imeti trajnosten učinek na posebej določene vrste in habitate, med drugim tudi prek razširjanja doseženih rezultatov in pridobljenih izkušenj.
70. since the first life instrument was introduced in 1992, the Commission has progressively developed and improved its management and control systems, inter alia taking into account the results of the Court’s previous audits. however, the audit concluded that measures financed by life-nature are not, as yet, sufficiently safeguarded beyond project completion (paragraphs 18 to 20). seLection Procedure 71. 
70. odkar je bil leta 1992 uveden prvi instrument LIFe, je komisija postopoma razvijala in izboljševala svoje upravljavske in kontrolne sisteme, pri čemer je med drugim upoštevala rezultate prejšnjih revizij sodišča. vendar je bilo z revizijo ugotovljeno, da nadaljevanje ukrepov, ki jih financira LIFe-narava, po zaključku projekta še ni dovolj dobro zagotovljeno (odstavki 18 do 20).
The sustainability-related criteria adopted for the selection of life-nature projects become less relevant with life+. moreover, since subcriteria are not weighted it is not clear how projects are penalised when they do not satisfy one or more of the relevant subcriteria (paragraphs 22 to 26). 72. 
IzbIrnI POstOPek 71. merila v zvezi s trajnostjo, ki so bila sprejeta za izbor projektov LIFe-narava, so pri LIFe+ postala manj ustrezna. poleg tega podmerila niso ponderirana, zato ni jasno, kako se projekti sankci-onirajo, kadar ne izpolnjujejo enega ali več ustreznih podmeril (odstavki 22 do 26).
The audit could not find any evidence of the expert contribution by the european environment agency or the european Topic Centre on biological diversity to the design of the selection model adopted (or to any other aspect of life project management) despite the fact that the life instrument absorbs 70 % of the budget managed by dg env (paragraph 27). special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 73. 
72. pri reviziji ni bilo mogoče zaslediti nobenih dokazov o tem, da bi evropska agencija za okolje ali evropski tematski center za biotsko raznovrstnost s svojim strokovnim znanjem prispevala k zasnovi sprejetega modela za izbiro (ali h kateremu koli drugemu vidiku upravljanja projektov LIFe), čeprav je 70 % proračuna, ki ga upravlja GD za okolje, namenjenega instrumentu LIFe (odstavek 27). posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
The Commission contracts external evaluators for the independent technical assessment of the project proposals received. however, the prioritisation model used (criteria, subcriteria, weighting, scales, etc.) is not sufficiently detailed or transparent for the interested public. on the other hand, the lengthy decision-making process for grant awards sometimes affects the feasibility of project implementation and undermines stakeholder involvement (paragraph 28). 
73. komisija najame zunanje ocenjevalce za neodvisno strokovno ocenjevanje prejetih projektnih predlogov. vendar uporabljeni model za prednostno razvrščanje (merila, podmerila, ponderiranje, lestvice itn.) ni dovolj podroben ali pregleden za zainteresirano javnost. po drugi strani pa dolg proces odločanja o dodelitvi donacij včasih vpliva na možnosti izvajanja projekta in ogroža udeležbo zainteresiranih strani (odstavek 28).
27 special report no 11/2003, recommendation after paragraph 89. 
27 posebno poročilo št. 11/2003, priporočilo, ki sledi odstavku 89.
38 recommendAtion 1 (i) The Commission should review its selection model on the basis of an opinion by a panel of experts, including a contribution from the european environment agency or the european Topic Centre on biological diversity, validate it and make it available to all interested parties. (ii) The model should prioritise life-nature project proposals which can give assurance as to the continuity of results. in this respect the Court stresses that it recommends that the Commission should examine whether it would be expedient to separate the management of the ‘nature’ and ‘environment’ strands, in view of their intrinsic differences, thus favouring their long term management27. (iii)possible ways of shortening the selection procedure should also be considered, namely by taking into account solutions inspired by other grant schemes, financed from the eu budget and by reviewing the interinstitutional proceedings currently in force. special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
38 PrIPOrOčIlO 1 (i) komisija bi morala na podlagi mnenja odbora strokovnjakov, vključno s prispevkom evropske agencije za okolje in evropskega tematskega centra za biotsko raznovrstnost, pregledati svoj model za izbiro, ga potrditi in dati na razpolago vsem zainteresiranim stranem. (ii) model bi moral dati prednost tistim projektnim predlogom za LIFe-narava, ki bi lahko dali zagotovilo o nadaljevanju rezultatov. sodišče v tem pogledu poudarja svoje priporočilo, da bi komisija morala preveriti, ali bi bilo glede na njune notranje razlike koristno ločiti upravljanje področij „narava“ in „okolje“ ter tako olajšati njuno dolgoročno upravljanje27. (iii) razmisliti bi bilo treba tudi o možnih načinih za skrajšanje izbirnega postopka, in sicer z upoštevanjem rešitev, ki so nastale na podlagi primerjave z drugimi sistemi donacij, ki se financirajo iz proračuna eu, ter s pregledom trenutno veljavnih medinstitucionalnih postopkov. posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
imPLementAtion of Projects 74. The on-the-spot visits to 35 projects showed that most of the foreseen investments had been implemented and were contributing to the improvement of the species’ and habitats’ conservation status in natura 2000 sites. however, several weaknesses affecting the project results were identified. 
IzVajanje PrOjektOV 74. obiski na kraju samem, opravljeni pri 35 projektih, so pokazali, da je bila izvedena večina predvidenih naložb, ki so tudi prispevale k izboljševanju stanja ohranjenosti vrst in habitatov na območjih natura 2000. vendar so bile odkrite številne slabosti, ki so vplivale na rezultate projektov.
Certain investments financed had relatively limited impact on the targeted species and habitats, either taking into account their excessive cost or due to the high probability of them quickly losing impact after completion unless necessary maintenance work was carried out. moreover, the conditions relevant for ensuring the continuity of the project results have not always been adequately safeguarded. 
Določene financirane naložbe so imele relativno omejen učinek na ciljne vrste in habitate, saj so bili njihovi stroški previsoki ali pa je bilo zelo verjetno, da bodo po zaključku hitro izgubile učinek, če se ne izvede nujno vzdrževanje. poleg tega pogoji za zagotavljanje kontinuitete rezultatov projektov niso bili vedno ustrezno zagotovljeni.
The project monitoring performed by external nature conservation experts focuses on checking and reporting on project progress in relation to the foreseen investments and actions. 
Zunanji strokovnjaki s področja ohranjanja narave se pri spremljanju projektov osredotočajo na pregled napredka pri projektu glede na predvidene naložbe in dejavnosti ter na poročanje o njem.
The achievement of the specific conservation objectives – such as improvements in the conservation status of targeted species or habitats – is not adequately monitored. 
Doseganje posebnih ciljev ohranjenosti, kot so izboljšave stanja ohranjenosti ciljnih vrst ali habitatov, ni ustrezno spremljano. vodje projektov niso dolžni spremljati učinka ukrepov na ciljne vrste ali habitate.
The project promoters are not required to monitor the impact of the measures on the targeted species or habitats. as a consequence, the Commission is usually well informed on the progress of the individual project investments executed but it does not dispose of information on the extent to which targeted project results were in fact achieved and on their impact. moreover, effective monitoring requires a set of appropriate indicators and criteria to be established by the Commission on the basis of expertise available, for instance, in the european environment agency and european Topic Centre (paragraphs 30 to 40). 
Zato je komisija običajno dobro obveščena o napredku pri posameznih izvršenih naložbah pri projektu, vendar nima informacij o tem, v kolikšni meri so bili ciljni rezultati projektov dejansko doseženi in kakšen je bil njihov učinek. poleg tega je za uspešno spremljanje potreben sklop ustreznih kazalnikov in meril, ki jih mora komisija določiti na podlagi strokovnega znanja, ki je na primer na voljo v evropski agenciji za okolje ali v evropskem tematskem centru (odstavka 30 do 40).
39 recommendAtion 2 (i) The Commission should take the necessary initiatives to improve project monitoring in respect of the results achieved as well as on the safeguards established on the use given to life-funded investments and the reality of the implementation of the management contracts and plans. (ii) appropriate indicators and criteria should be developed by the Commission for monitoring project outcomes on the basis of the expertise available namely in the european environment agency and in the european Topic Centre. special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
39 PrIPOrOčIlO 2 (i) komisija bi morala sprejeti potrebne pobude za izboljšanje spremljanja projektov v zvezi z doseženimi rezultati ter jamstvi, ki so bila določena glede tega, kako se bodo uporabile naložbe, financirane iz LIFe, ter v zvezi z dejanskim stanjem izvajanja pogodb in načrtov upravljanja. (ii) komisija bi morala za spremljanje izidov projektov razviti ustrezne kazalnike in merila na podlagi strokovnega znanja, ki ga imata evropska agencija za okolje in evropski tematski center. posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
disseminAtion of resuLts 76. some linguistic difficulties still have to be overcome and there is a need for improved minimum quality standards for the information to be disseminated on the projects’ websites. The dg environment life projects database does not allow for easy and wide access to lessons learned, and the information on technical and scientific matters is generally not provided for the potential expert public (paragraphs 42 to 53). 
razšIrjanje rezUltatOV 76. Še vedno je treba premagati nekatere jezikovne težave in izboljšati standarde najmanjše obvezne kakovosti informacij, ki jih je treba objaviti na spletnih straneh projektov. podatkovna zbirka GD za okolje o projektih LIFe ne omogoča enostavnega in širokega dostopa do pridobljenih izkušenj, informacije o tehničnih in znanstvenih zadevah pa na splošno niso zagotovljene potencialni strokovni javnosti (odstavki 42 do 53).
40 recommendAtion 3 (i) The Commission should review its communication strategy, activities and tools, bearing in mind that particular attention should be paid to the dissemination to interested experts of relevant information and lessons learned. The improvement of the search possibilities offered to access information on the life database should also be considered. (ii) moreover, the beneficiaries should be required to provide more technical details on the methods used, lessons learnt and identified best practices to ensure wider dissemination. 
40 PrIPOrOčIlO 3 (i) komisija bi morala pregledati svojo strategijo, dejavnosti in orodja obveščanja ter pri tem upoštevati, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti razširjanju ustreznih informacij in pridobljenih izkušenj med zainteresirane strokovnjake. prav tako bi bilo treba razmisliti o izboljšanju razpoložljivih možnosti iskanja za dostop do informacij o podatkovni zbirki LIFe. (ii) poleg tega bi morali biti upravičenci dolžni zagotoviti več tehničnih podrobnosti o uporabljenih metodah, pridobljenih izkušnjah in ugotovljenih najboljših praksah, da bi se zagotovilo obširnejše razširjanje. dOlgOrOčnO UPraVljanje rezUltatOV PrOjektOV 77. projekti LIFe-narava so precej prispevali k izvajanju omrežja natura 2000. razen tega, da je komisija ob zaključku projekta zahtevala pripravo načrtov ohranjevanja po zaključku projekta, je projektom LIFe po njihovem zaključku namenila premalo pozornosti, upravičenci in partnerji pa po zakonu ali na kateri koli drug način niso dolžni zagotoviti nadaljevanja rezultatov projektov.
The sustainability of the conservation measures financed by life-nature is not safeguarded beyond the project end, and thus the impact of the eu funding may quickly diminish, as no technical ex-post checks take place and the Commission has no follow-up scheme or any reactive instrument for ensuring that the results are not lost (paragraphs 55 to 67). special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
Trajnost ohranitvenih ukrepov, ki jih financira LIFe-narava, po koncu projekta ni zagotovljena, zato se lahko učinek financiranja eu hitro zmanjša, saj se ne izvajajo nobeni naknadni strokovni pregledi, komisija pa nima sistema nadaljnjega spremljanja ali katerega koli drugega odzivnega instrumenta, s katerim bi zagotavljala, da rezultati ne izginejo (odstavki 55 do 67). posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
41 recommendAtion 4 (i) The grant agreements should commit beneficiaries — and, if appropriate, the national co-financers — to sustaining the project results for a minimum period after the project closure. Compliance with the corresponding contractual obligations should be enforced through appropriate penalties and recoveries. (ii) The introduction of a follow-up scheme for the 'after-life funding' should be considered by the Commission, and may require a change in the legal framework. 
41 PrIPOrOčIlO 4 (i) upravičenci – in, če je ustrezno, nacionalni sofinancerji – bi se morali v sporazumih o donacijah zavezati k ohranjanju trajnosti projektnih rezultatov za najmanjše obvezno obdobje po zaključku projekta. spoštovanje ustreznih pogodbenih obveznosti bi se moralo zagotavljati z ustreznimi kaznimi in izterjavami. (ii) komisija bi morala razmisliti o uvedbi sistema nadaljnjega spremljanja projektov po koncu financiranja iz LIFe in bi lahko zahtevala spremembo zakonskega okvira.
This report was adopted by the Court of auditors at its meeting in luxembourg of 2 july 2009. 
To poročilo je sprejelo računsko sodišče v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju dne 2. julija 2009.
For the Court of Auditors vítor manuel da silva Caldeira President special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
Za Računsko sodišče vítor manuel da silva caldeira Predsednik posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
42 Annex i Projects Audited on-the-sPot Project No MS Project Name Acronym Beneficiary LIFE00 NAT/B/007148 BE Actions for Birds of Reedbeds in Bassin de la Haine Haine Natagora/RNOB asbl LIFE02/ NAT/B/008593 BE Restoration and sustainable management of upper Meuse dry Grasslands Haute Meuse Ardenne & Gaume asbl LIFE03/NAT/B/000024 BE Integrated restoration of natural habitats on military areas in Natura 2000 Militaire Gebieden Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Aminal (afdeling Natuur) LIFE05 NAT/B/000090 BE Restoration of the lowland river system 'Grote Nete' Grote Nete Natuurpunkt Beheer v.z.w. 
42 PrIlOga I PrOjektI, reVIdIranI na krajU samem Številka projekta DČ Ime projekta Akronim Upravičenec LIFE00 NAT/B/007148 BE Ukrepi za ptice in trstičja v porečju reke Haine Haine Natagora/RNOB asbl LIFE02/ NAT/B/008593 BE Obnavljanje in trajnostno upravljanje suhih travinj v zgornjem toku reke Meuse Haute Meuse Ardenne & Gaume asbl LIFE03/NAT/B/000024 BE Integrirano obnavljanje naravnih habitatov na območjih Natura 2000, določenih za vojaške namene. Militaire Gebieden Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, AMINAL (afdeling Natuur) LIFE05 NAT/B/000090 BE Obnavljanje nižinskega rečnega sistema „Grote Nete“ Grote Nete Natuurpunkt Beheer v.z.w.
Gral de Medio Ambiente LIFE05 NAT/E/000067 ES Conservation and restoration of 'Aiako Harria' SCI (ES2120016) LIFE AIAKO HARRIA Direción General de Montes y Medio Natural. 
Gral de Medio Ambiente LIFE05 NAT/E/000067 ES Ohranjanje in obnavljanje OPS„Aiako Harria“ LIC (ES2120016) LIFE AIAKO HARRIA Direción General de Montes y Medio Natural.
Departamento para el Desarrollo del Medio Rural LIFE00 NAT/E/007339 ES Model of restoration of dunes habitats in 'L'Albufera de Valencia' Dunas Albufera Ayuntamiento de Valencia — Concejalía de Devesa y Albufera y Alcaldías de Barrio special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
Departamento para el Desarrollo del Medio Rural LIFE00 NAT/E/007339 ES Model ohranjanja habitatov s sipinami v „L'Albufera de Valencia“ Dunas Albufera Ayuntamiento de Valencia – Concejalía de Devesa y Albufera y Alcaldías de Barrio posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija