natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
14 The objective of the analysis is to: (i) assess whether a Member State has breached the deficit and/or debt criteria, taking account of any particular circumstances (severe economic downturn, recent trends and forecasts for indicators, adjustment for potential output, etc.); (ii) if a breach of either the deficit or the debt criteria is identified in a Member State, prepare a report under Article 126(3), which considers in detail a series of aggravating and mitigating factors, and assesses the case for launching an EDP; the report is sent to the Economic and Financial Committee (EFC)14 for an opinion; and (iii) if an excessive deficit situation is recognised, inform the Member State and the Council and recommend that the latter launch an EDP with deadlines for the Member State to take corrective action. 
14 Cilj analize je: (i) oceniti, ali je država članica prekršila merila v zvezi s primanjkljajem in/ali dolgom, ob upoštevanju vseh posebnih razmer (resen upad gospodarske rasti, najnovejša gibanja in napovedi kazalnikov, prilagoditev potencialni proizvodnji itd.); (ii) če se ugotovi, da je bilo v državi članici prekršeno merilo v zvezi s primanjkljajem ali dolgom, pripraviti poročilo v skladu s členom 126(3), v katerem se podrobno preuči vrsta oteževalnih in olajševalnih dejavnikov, in oceni, ali bi bilo treba začeti postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem; poročilo se pošlje Ekonomsko-finančnemu odboru,14 da izreče mnenje, ter (iii) če je bil ugotovljen čezmerni primanjkljaj, obvestiti državo članico in Svet ter priporočiti Svetu, naj začne izvajati postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem in določi roke, v katerih mora država članica izvesti popravljalne ukrepe.
9 Methodological visits are designed to monitor the processes and verify the accounts underlying the reported data and to draw conclusions as to the quality of the latter. 
9 Namen metodoloških obiskov je spremljati procese in preveriti računovodske izkaze, na katerih temeljijo sporočeni podatki, ter sprejeti zaključke o kakovosti teh podatkov.
Eurostat carries out methodological visits in exceptional cases, where significant risks or problems with respect to the quality of the data are clearly identified. 
Eurostat opravi metodološke obiske v izjemnih primerih, kadar so jasno ugotovljena bistvena tveganja ali težave v zvezi s kakovostjo podatkov.
11 Eurostat may unilaterally amend a Member State’s data where it is able to estimate the impact of the reservation with sufficient accuracy. 
11 Eurostat lahko enostransko spremeni podatke države članice, če lahko dovolj točno oceni učinek pridržka.
12 See Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area (OJ L 306, 23.11.2011, p. 
1173/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. novembra 2011 o učinkovitem izvrševanju proračunskega nadzora v euroobmočju (UL L 306, 23.11.2011, str.
13 DG Economic and Financial Affairs produces economic forecasts on behalf of the Commission. 
13 GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve pripravi gospodarske napovedi za Komisijo.
They serve as a basis for various economic surveillance procedures, for example in the context of the European Semester, and are published three times a year (spring, autumn and winter). 
Te zagotavljajo podlago za različne postopke ekonomskega nadzora, na primer v okviru evropskega semestra, in se objavijo trikrat na leto (spomladi, jeseni in pozimi).
14 The Economic and Financial Committee is a working group set up to promote policy coordination among the Member States, notably by supporting the work of the ECOFIN Council. 
14 Ekonomsko-finančni odbor je delovna skupina, vzpostavljena za spodbujanje usklajevanja politik med državami članicami, predvsem s podpiranjem dela Sveta ECOFIN.
It is composed of senior officials from national administrations and central banks, the ECB and the Commission. 
Sestavljajo ga visoki uradniki nacionalnih uprav in centralnih bank, ECB in Komisije.
Further information on its organisation and objectives can be found in Article 134 of the TFEU and at http://europa. eu/efc/index_en.htm. 
Dodatne informacije o njegovi organizaciji in ciljih so na voljo v členu 134 PDEU in na spletišču http://europa.eu/ efc/index_en.htm.
The Member State is then informed accordingly and the decision is published. 
Državo članico nato ustrezno obvesti in objavi sklep.
The Council sets a deadline for addressing the situation (in principle one year from the detection of the excessive deficit, although several multiannual EDPs were launched in 2009 due to the financial and economic crisis). 
Svet določi rok za ureditev razmer (načeloma eno leto od ugotovitve čezmernega primanjkljaja, vendar je bilo leta 2009 zaradi finančne in gospodarske krize začetih več večletnih postopkov v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem).
Table 1 summa‐ rises all the Council’s EDP decisions to 17 November 2015. 
V tabeli 1 so povzeti vsi sklepi Sveta o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem do 17. novembra 2015.
16 In the case of multiannual EDPs, the Council also sets annual fiscal targets. 
16 V primeru večletnih postopkov v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem Svet določi tudi letne fiskalne cilje.
Through its recommendations, moreover, it usually calls for the development and implementation of national structural measures, such as public expenditure reform. 
Poleg tega v svojih priporočilih običajno pozove k oblikovanju in izvajanju nacionalnih strukturnih ukrepov, kot je reforma javnofinančnih odhodkov.
17 At this point, euro‐area Member States that have already been sanctioned for non‐compliance with the recommendations based on Article 121(4) TFEU on the preventive arm of the Pact, or whose breach of the deficit and debt ratios is espe‐ cially serious, may also face a fine in the form of a redeemable non‐interest‐bear‐ ing deposit of 0.2 % of GDP. 
17 Na tej stopnji se lahko državam članicam euroobmočja, ki jim je že bila naložena sankcija za neupoštevanje priporočil na podlagi člena 121(4) PDEU o preventivnem delu pakta, ali ki so zlasti resno presegle delež primanjkljaja in dolga, naloži tudi sankcija v obliki brezobrestnega depozita na odpoklic v višini 0,2 % BDP.
Source: DG Economic and Financial Affairs website (as at 17.11.2015). 
7.
Introduction 23 Corrective action: reporting by Member States, monitoring and surveillance by the Commission 18 This section describes how corrective measures are reported to and monitored by the Commission. 
Uvod 23 Popravljalni ukrepi: poročanje držav članic, spremljanje in nadzor Komisije 18 V tem oddelku je opisano, kako se Komisiji poroča o popravljalnih ukrepih in kako jih Komisija spremlja.
Reporting by Member States 19 Member States are responsible for developing and implementing correc‐ tive measures to restore fiscal stability in accordance with the Council’s recommendations. 
Poročanje držav članic 19 Države članice so odgovorne za oblikovanje in izvajanje popravljalnih ukrepov za ponovno vzpostavitev fiskalne stabilnosti v skladu s priporočili Sveta.
20 They are required to keep DG Economic and Financial Affairs informed about the measures planned and/or adopted and developments in their fiscal and econom‐ ic situation15. 
20 GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve morajo obveščati o načrtovanih in/ali sprejetih ukrepih ter o razvoju svojih fiskalnih in gospodarskih razmer15.
They must submit a report on action taken and disclose EDP‐rel‐ evant information in their stability or convergence programmes16 and national reform programmes17 prepared in the context of the European Semester. 
Predložiti morajo poročilo o sprejetih ukrepih in razkriti informacije, pomembne za postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, v programih stabilnosti ali konvergenčnih programih16 ter nacionalnih reformnih programih17, pripravljenih v okviru evropskega semestra.
Before the ‘Six‐pack’ (2011), Member States were not legally obliged to submit a report on action taken. 
Pred „šesterčkom“ (2011) države članice niso bile zakonsko zavezane k predložitvi poročila o sprejetih ukrepih.
The ‘Two‐pack’ then introduced additional reporting require‐ ments for euro‐area Member States (see Figure 1 and Figure 7) to enhance the Commission’s monitoring and surveillance. 
Z „dvojčkom“ so bile nato uvedene dodatne zahteve glede poročanja za države članice euroobmočja (glej sliko 1 in sliko 7), da bi Komisija okrepila spremljanje in nadzor.
Monitoring and surveillance by the Commission 21 DG Economic and Financial Affairs is responsible for examining whether a Mem‐ ber State has complied with the Council’s recommendations, for monitoring the implementation of EDP corrective measures and for proposing further action. 
Spremljanje in nadzor Komisije 21 GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve je odgovoren za preučitev, ali je država članica upoštevala priporočila Sveta, spremljanje izvajanja popravljalnih ukrepov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem ter predlaganje nadaljnjih ukrepov.
15 Member States must report within the deadlines set by the Council under Article 3(4) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1177/2011 of 8 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure (OJ L 306, 23.11.2011, p. 
15 Države članice morajo poročati v rokih, ki jih določi Svet v skladu s členom 3(4) Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1177/2011 z dne 8. novembra 2011 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem (UL L 306, 23.11.2011, str.
33) for compliance with the recommendations (from three to six months depending on the seriousness of the situation). 
33) za upoštevanje priporočil (od treh do šestih mesecev glede na resnost razmer).
16 Under the SGP, stability and convergence programmes are submitted once a year, the former by euro‐area Member States and the latter by Member States outside the euro. 
16 V okviru Pakta za stabilnost in rast se programi stabilnosti in konvergenčni programi predložijo enkrat na leto. Programe stabilnosti predložijo države članice euroobmočja, konvergenčne programe pa države članice, ki niso v euroobmočju.
They set out the Member State’s budgetary plan for the next three or four years. 
Države članice v njih opredelijo svoj proračunski načrt za naslednja tri ali štiri leta.
17 A document which presents the country’s policies and measures to sustain growth and jobs and reach the Europe 2020 targets. 
17 Dokument, ki predstavlja politike in ukrepe države za ohranjanje rasti in delovnih mest ter doseganje ciljev strategije Evropa 2020.
It is presented in parallel with each annual stability/convergence programme. 
Predloži se skupaj z vsakim letnim programom stabilnosti/konvergenčnim programom.
Introduction 24 22 DG Economic and Financial Affairs carries out assessments of the action taken by each Member State under an EDP: (i) as early as three or six months from the launch of the procedure on the basis of the Member State’s report on the action taken in response to the Council recommendations; (ii) regular monitoring coinciding with each forecast, in the light also of informa‐ tion disclosed by the Member State in its stability/convergence programme and, for euro‐area countries, its draft budgetary plan; and (iii) at the expiry of the deadline, unless the procedure is abrogated. 
Uvod 24 22 GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve izvede ocene ukrepov, ki so jih posamezne države članice sprejele v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem: (i) že tri ali šest mesecev po začetku postopka na podlagi poročila države članice o ukrepih, sprejetih v odziv na priporočila Sveta; (ii) v okviru rednega spremljanja, ki sovpada s posamezno napovedjo, tudi ob upoštevanju informacij, ki jih je razkrila država članica v programu stabilno-sti/konvergenčnem programu in v primeru držav članic euroobmočja v osnutku proračunskega načrta, ter (iii) ob izteku roka, razen v primeru razveljavitve postopka.
23 More specifically, DG Economic and Financial Affairs assesses whether the Mem‐ ber State has announced or taken measures that seem adequate to ensure suf‐ ficient progress towards correction of the excessive deficit within the time limits set by the Council. 
23 Natančneje, GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve oceni, ali je država članica razglasila ali sprejela ukrepe, za katere se zdi, da bodo ustrezno zagotovili zadosten napredek pri zmanjševanju čezmernega primanjkljaja v rokih, ki jih je določil Svet.
24 Depending on the assessment made, DG Economic and Financial Affairs will pro‐ pose different actions to the Council: (i) where the Commission considers that the Member State has complied with the recommendations and that the EDP requirements are likely to be fulfilled, the procedure will be ‘held in abeyance18; (ii) where there has been effective action19 but ‘unexpected adverse events with major unfavourable consequences for government finances have occurred’20, a revised recommendation may be proposed. 
24 GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve glede na izvedeno oceno Svetu predlaga različne ukrepe: (i) če Komisija meni, da je država članica upoštevala priporočila in da bodo zahteve glede postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem verjetno izpolnjene, postopek miruje18; (ii) če so bili sprejeti uspešni ukrepi19, vendar so nastopili „nepričakovani neugodni gospodarski dogodki z večjimi negativnimi posledicami za javne finance“20, se lahko predlaga revidirano priporočilo.
The revised recommendation may extend the deadline for correction of the deficit, usually by one year, or may set out new nominal and structural targets linked to a new underlying macroeconomic scenario, without extending the deadline; (iii) where there has been no effective action and the Member State is in the euro area, the EDP may be ‘stepped up’. 
V revidiranem priporočilu se lahko podaljša rok za zmanjšanje primanjkljaja, običajno za leto dni, ali določijo novi nominalni in strukturni cilji, povezani z novim osnovnim makroekonomskim scenarijem, brez podaljšanja roka; (iii) če niso bili sprejeti nobeni uspešni ukrepi in je država članica v euroobmočju, se lahko postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem zaostri.
The Council will issue a notice inviting the Member State to take specific measures and to submit reports by set dead‐ lines, and if the Member State fails to comply with this notice the Council can impose sanctions21. 
Svet izda poziv, s katerim državo članico pozove k sprejetju posebnih ukrepov in predložitvi poročil do določenih rokov. Če država članica ne upošteva tega poziva, lahko Svet uvede sankcije21.
Where applicable, the Council may decide to suspend payments under the Cohesion Fund and, with effect from the 2014‐2020 pro‐ gramming period, the European Structural Investment Funds. 
Kjer je ustrezno, se lahko Svet odloči, da začasno ustavi plačila iz Kohezijskega sklada ter, z veljavnostjo od začetka programskega obdobja 2014–2020, iz evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov.
18 Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure (OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 6). 
1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem (UL L 209, 2.8.1997, str. 6).
While a procedure is in abeyance, the Council and Commission regularly monitor the Member State’s compliance with the recommendations. 
Svet in Komisija med mirovanjem postopka redno spremljata, ali država članica upošteva priporočila.
Depending on the conclusions of monitoring, the procedure can be either abrogated or reactivated. 
Glede na ugotovitve spremljanja se lahko postopek razveljavi ali ponovno aktivira.
19 Member States that have delivered a fiscal effort in line with the recommendations are assessed as having taken effective action. 
19 Za države članice, ki so dosegle fiskalni napor v skladu s priporočili, se šteje, da so sprejele uspešne ukrepe.
20 Article 3(5) of Regulation (EC) 1467/97. 
20 Člen 3(5) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97.
21 As set out in Article 126 and Article 139 TFEU and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, as amended. 
21 Kot je določeno v členih 126 in 139 PDEU ter členu 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97, kakor je bila spremenjena.
Introduction 25 Outcome of EDP 25 The expected outcome of the EDP decision and corrective action is that the Member State will restore budgetary discipline, and hence the sustainability of its public finances, by correcting the excessive deficit within a reasonable deadline. 
Uvod 25 Rezultat postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem 25 Pričakovani rezultat sklepa o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem in popravljalnih ukrepov je, da bo država članica ponovno vzpostavila proračunsko disciplino in s tem vzdržnost javnih financ, tako da bo zmanjšala čezmerni primanjkljaj v razumnem roku.
The EDP decision is also intended to foster the implementation of structural reforms in the Member State, which is conducive to public finance stability in the medium/long term. 
Namen sklepa o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem je tudi spodbuditi izvajanje strukturnih reform v državi članici, ki prispevajo k srednje-in dolgoročni stabilnosti javnih financ.
Audit scope, objectives and 26 approach Audit scope and objectives 26 The Court assessed whether the Commission is managing the implementation of the EDP appropriately. 
Obseg in cilji revizije 26 ter revizijski pristop Obseg in cilji revizije 26 Sodišče je ocenilo, ali Komisija ustrezno upravlja izvajanje postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
For this purpose we looked at the procedure as applied to Cyprus, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy and Malta22 between April 2009 and May 201523. 
V ta namen je pregledalo postopek, ki se je uporabljal na Cipru, Češkem, v Franciji, Nemčiji, Italiji in na Malti22 v obdobju od aprila 2009 do maja 201523.
In relation to the quality of data, we looked at the period 2008 ‐ 2014 and, where necessary, back to 2005. 
Kakovost podatkov je bila pregledana za obdobje med letoma 2008 in 2014 in po potrebi nazaj do leta 2005.
27 However, although we analysed some of the details underlying the definition of the EDP threshold values, we did not assess the appropriateness of these values, nor did we assess the quality of the measures taken by Member States to imple‐ ment the procedure. 
27 Čeprav smo analizirali nekatere podrobnosti, na katerih temelji opredelitev vrednosti pragov postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, nismo ocenjevali ustreznosti teh vrednosti in kakovosti ukrepov, ki so jih države članice sprejele za izvajanje tega postopka.
28 More specifically, we examined: (i) the Commission’s assessment of the quality of Member States’ statistical data (Eurostat) and its interpretation of those data (DG Economic and Financial Af‐ fairs) leading ultimately to recommendations that the Council initiate or take further action in relation to an EDP; (ii) the Commission’s monitoring and surveillance tasks; and (iii) the outcome of the procedure. 
28 Natančneje, preučili smo: (i) oceno Komisije glede kakovosti statističnih podatkov držav članic (Eurostat) in njeno razlago teh podatkov (GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve), na podlagi česar so bila sprejeta priporočila, naj Svet začne postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem ali nadalje ukrepa v zvezi z njim; (ii) naloge Komisije na področju spremljanja in nadzora ter (iii) rezultat postopka.
29 The main audit criteria were derived from: (i) regulatory requirements (e.g. Council regulations, decisions, directives and conclusions); and (ii) the Commission’s internal rules and procedures (e.g. instructions and guidelines). 
29 Glavna revizijska merila izhajajo iz: (i) regulativnih zahtev (npr. iz uredb, sklepov, direktiv in sklepov Sveta) ter (ii) notranjih pravil in postopkov Komisije (npr. navodil in smernic).
22 In Malta two separate procedures were launched during the period. 
22 Na Malti sta bila v tem obdobju uvedena dva ločena postopka.
23 The sample was taken from a shortlist of Member States which excluded countries that (i) are currently addressed by other Court audit tasks in the financial and economic governance area (Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Portugal, Romania and Greece), (ii) have never been placed under an EDP (Estonia, Sweden and Luxembourg), (iii) benefit from special or unique conditions in relation to the EDP (United Kingdom), or (iv) only recently joined the European Union (Croatia). 
23 Vzorec je bil sestavljen iz ožjega seznama držav članic, na katerem ni bilo držav, ki (i) so trenutno obravnavane v okviru drugih revizijskih nalog Sodišča s področja finančnega in ekonomskega upravljanja (Madžarska, Irska, Latvija, Portugalska, Romunija in Grčija), (ii) v zvezi s katerimi še nikoli ni bil začet postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem (Estonija, Švedska in Luksemburg), (iii) imajo posebne ali edinstvene pogoje, kar zadeva postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem (Združeno kraljestvo), ali (iv) so se nedavno pridružile Evropski uniji (Hrvaška).
In selecting among the remaining Member States, the aim was to obtain a representative sample of large and small countries, both within and outside the euro area, and, as far as possible, of procedures launched after 2008 that have since been, or could have been, closed. 
Cilj izbiranja med ostalimi državami članicami je bil pridobiti reprezentativni vzorec velikih in majhnih držav tako v euroobmočju kot tudi zunaj njega ter, kolikor je to mogoče, v povezavi s postopki, ki so se začeli po letu 2008 in so oziroma bi lahko bili zaključeni.
Audit scope, objectives and approach 27 Approach 30 We reviewed the documentation relating to the separate EDPs. 
Obseg in cilji revizije ter revizijski pristop 27 Pristop 30 Pregledali smo dokumentacijo, ki zadeva ločene postopke v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
We also inter‐ viewed Eurostat and DG Economic and Financial Affairs staff and representatives of the institutions involved in implementing the procedure in each of the Mem‐ ber States selected for the audit. 
Opravili smo tudi razgovore z uslužbenci Eurostata in GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve ter s predstavniki institucij, ki sodelujejo pri izvajanju postopka v vseh državah članicah, izbranih za revizijo.
Table 2 lists the entities visited in each Member State. 
V tabeli 2 je seznam obiskanih subjektov v vsaki državi članici.
31 Finally, we discussed EDP issues with representatives of several organisations whose views were relevant to the audit (including representatives of the IMF and of the United Kingdom Office for Budget Responsibility), and for more technically complex aspects we made use of specialised internal and external expertise. 
31 Nazadnje, o vprašanjih o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem je Sodišče razpravljalo s predstavniki več organizacij, katerih mnenje je bilo pomembno za revizijo (vključno s predstavniki MDS in britanskega urada za proračunsko odgovornost). V primeru tehnično zapletenejših vidikov smo se posvetovali z notranjimi in zunanjimi strokovnjaki.
Visits to Member State authorities and other entities Supreme Audit Institution National Statistical Institute Ministry of Finance Fiscal Council Central Bank Others Czech Republic √ √ √ Germany √ √ √ France √ √ Italy √ √ √ √ √ Economic Adviser to the Presidency of the Council of Ministers Cyprus √ √ √ √ √ DG Economic and Financial Affairs resident representative Malta √ √ √ √ Source: ECA. 
Obiski organov in drugih subjektov držav članic Vrhovna revizijska institucija Nacionalni statistični urad Ministrstvo za finance Fiskalni svet Centralna banka Drugo Češka √ √ √ Nemčija √ √ √ Francija √ √ Italija √ √ √ √ √ Ekonomski svetovalec predsedstva Sveta ministrov Ciper √ √ √ √ √ Predstavnik GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve v državi članici Malta √ √ √ √ Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.