natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
TABLE 9 COST OF ADDITIONAL WORKS FOR SELECTED BUILDINGS 30 Cost/building Contract 1 Contract 2 Contract 3 Contract 4 Original contract (euro) 2 152 476,20 2 124 913,27 2 140 101,82 2 117 980,95 Difference compared to cheapest (euro) 34 495,25 6 932,31 22 120,87 0,00 Difference compared to cheapest (%) + 1,6 % + 0,3 % + 1,0 % 0,0 % Additional works 282 307,78 201 954,75 151 235,25 127 811,34 Difference compared to cheapest (euro) 154 496,44 74 143,41 23 423,91 0,00 Difference compared to cheapest (%) + 120,9 % + 58,0 % + 18,3 % 0,0 % In % of building cost 13,1 % 9,5 % 7,1 % 6,0 % Final cost 2 434 783,98 2 326 868,02 2 291 337,07 2 245 792,29 Difference compared to cheapest (euro) 188 991,69 81 075,73 45 544,78 0,00 Difference compared to cheapest (%) + 8,4 % + 3,6 % + 2,0 % 0,0 % Number of buildings 221 7 12 22 1 For this contract, the number of buildings equals 20,53 standard-sized buildings because a number of these were smaller. 
TABELA 9 STROŠKI DODATNIH GRADBENIH DEL V IZBRANIH STAVBAH 30 Strošek/stavba Pogodba 1 Pogodba 2 Pogodba 3 Pogodba 4 Prvotna pogodba (v EUR) 2 152 476,20 2 124 913,27 2 140 101,82 2 117 980,95 Razlika v primerjavi z najcenejšo (v EUR) 34 495,25 6 932,31 22 120,87 0,00 Razlika v primerjavi z najcenejšo (v %) +1,6 % +0,3 % +1,0 % 0,0 % Dodatna gradbena dela 282 307,78 201 954,75 151 235,25 127 811,34 Razlika v primerjavi z najcenejšo (v EUR) 154 496,44 74 143,41 23 423,91 0,00 Razlika v primerjavi z najcenejšo (v %) +120,9 % +58,0 % +18,3 % 0,0 % V % stroškov gradnje 13,1 % 9,5 % 7,1 % 6,0 % Končni stroški 2 434 783,98 2 326 868,02 2 291 337,07 2 245 792,29 Razlika v primerjavi z najcenejšo (v EUR) 188 991,69 81 075,73 45 544,78 0,00 Razlika v primerjavi z najcenejšo (v %) +8,4 % +3,6 % +2,0 % 0,0 % Število stavb 221 7 12 22 1 Pri tej pogodbi o oddaji javnega naročila je število stavb enako 20,53 stavbe standardne velikosti, ker je bilo več teh stavb manjših.
The unit price for the additional costs are, however, calculated for each of the 22 buildings because the cost for heating systems and lift frames did not take this difference into account, whereas the calculation of the unit price of the buildings was based on the standardised figure. 
Vendar je cena na enoto za dodatne stroške izračunana za vsako od 22 stavb, ker ta razlika ni bila upoštevana pri stroških ogrevalnih sistemov in jaškov dvigal, izračun cene na enoto za stavbe pa je temeljil na standardiziranem številčnem podatku.
Source: European Court of Auditors’ analysis based on official documents. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
Vir: Analiza Evropskega računskega sodišča na podlagi uradnih dokumentov. Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
31 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WERE THE OPERATIONS PROVIDED FOR IN THE IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT COMPLIANT WITH THE EUSF REGULATION? 
31 ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA SO BILI UKREPI, DOLOČENI V SPORAZUMU O IZVAJANJU, SKLADNI Z UREDBO O SSEU?
The EUSF regulation states that the Fund can only be used for essential emergency operations, including temporary accommodation. 
Uredba o SSEU določa, da je mogoče sklad uporabiti le za bistvene nujne ukrepe, vključno z začasno nastanitvijo.
The regulation does not envisage financing real reconstruction or revenue-generating projects. 
Ne predvideva financiranja resnične obnove ali projektov, ki ustvarjajo prihodke.
Furthermore, according to the EUSF regulation, the scope of the Fund is limited to the most urgent needs, whereas longer-term reconstruction must be left to other instruments. 
Poleg tega je v skladu z uredbo o SSEU obseg sklada omejen na najnujnejše potrebe, dolgoročnejšo obnovo pa je treba prepustiti drugim instrumentom.
Therefore, in the Court’s opinion, the CASE project, which provided lasting and sustainable acccommodation, did not comply with the objectives of the EUSF. 
Zato po mnenju Sodišča projekt CASE, ki je zagotovil trajno in trajnostno nastanitev, ni bil v skladu s cilji SSEU.
Furthermore, the CASE apartments are expected to generate considerable revenue in the future, although there are no provisions in the EUSF regulation for such eventualities. 
Poleg tega bodo stanovanja CASE po pričakovanjih v prihodnosti ustvarjala znatne prihodke, čeprav v uredbi o SSEU ni nobenih določb o takih primerih.
Expenditure on initial aid and assistance and on the MAP houses and MUSP buildings was compliant with the EUSF regulation. 
Odhodki za začetno pomoč ter za hiše MAP in stavbe MUSP so bili skladni z uredbo o SSEU.
The projects addressed the immediate needs of the population through emergency operations expressly foreseen in the regulation. 
Projekti so obravnavali nujne potrebe prebivalstva z nujnimi ukrepi, ki so izrecno določeni v uredbi.
RECOMMENDATION 1 The Commission should clarify the provisions of the EUSF regulation in the light of the recent developments in disaster-response strategies, and consider if changes are needed in particular in relation to addressing temporary accomodation needs by means of permanent constructions, and concerning revenue-generating projects. 
PRIPOROČILO 1 Komisija bi morala razjasniti določbe uredbe o SSEU glede na nedavni razvoj strategij odzivanja na nesreče in razmisliti, ali so potrebne spremembe, posebno pri obravnavanju potreb po začasni nastanitvi s trajnimi stavbami in projektih, ki ustvarjajo prihodke.
Furthermore, when revenue is expected, the Commission should ensure that such revenue is reimbursed to the EU budget. 
Poleg tega bi v primerih, ko se pričakujejo prihodki, Komisija morala zagotoviti, da se iz njih izvrši povračilo v proračun EU.
The Commission should also re-analyse the application for the assistance by the Italian authorities in the light of the eligible criteria in the regulation. 
Komisija bi morala tudi ponovno analizirati vlogo za pomoč, ki so jo predložili italijanski organi, glede na merila za upravičenost iz uredbe.
32 WAS THE CASE PROJECT WELL PLANNED AND DESIGNED? 
32 JE BIL PROJEKT CASE DOBRO NAČRTOVAN IN ZASNOVAN?
Despite the discrepancy with the EUSF regulation, the strategy addressed the housing needs of the earthquake-affected population. 
Strategija je kljub neskladnosti z uredbo o SSEU obravnavala potrebe prebivalstva, ki ga je prizadel potres, po stanovanjih.
Alternative solutions appeared to be less effective at accommodating the high number of people given the difficult circumstances in the Abruzzi region. 
Druge mogoče rešitve so se ob upoštevanju težavnih razmer v deželi Abruci zdele manj uspešne pri zagotavljanju nastanitve velikemu številu ljudi.
The damage to buildings were assessed rapidly and reliably, but the actual accommodation needs of the displaced people were available only two months after the contracts had already been awarded. 
Škoda na stavbah je bila ocenjena hitro in zanesljivo, toda podatki o potrebah razseljenih po nastanitvi so bili na voljo šele dva meseca zatem, ko so bila javna naročila že oddana.
Thus, despite L’Aquila being located in the high seismic risk area, there were no adequate arrangements in place to make the information on the population available early enough to tailor the project accordingly. 
Čeprav je L’Aquila na potresno močno ogroženem območju, niso bile vzpostavljene ustrezne ureditve za to, da bi bili podatki o prebivalstvu na voljo dovolj hitro, da bi bilo mogoče projekt ustrezno prilagoditi.
In addition, the potential construction sites had not been identified and assessed in advance. 
Poleg tega ni bilo vnaprejšnjega ugotavljanja in ocenjevanja lokacij, ustreznih za gradnjo.
Despite the lack of adequate information on the earthquake-affected population, the technical specifications called for high-quality and expensive three-storey blocks, which absorbed the available resources and reduced the possibilities for adapting the project to the higher than foreseen demand. 
Kljub pomanjkanju ustreznih informacij o prebivalstvu, ki ga je prizadel potres, so tehnične specifikacije zahtevale visokokakovostne in drage trietažne bloke, ki so absorbirali razpoložljiva sredstva in zmanjšali možnosti za prilagoditev projekta povpraševanju, ki je bilo večje od pri-čakovanj.
Thus, the CASE project provided an insufficient number of apartments to address the finally identified needs of the displaced population. 
Zato projekt CASE ni zagotovil dovolj stanovanj, da bi zadostil končno ugotovljenim potrebam razseljenega prebivalstva.
The technical specifications for CASE housing were not prepared until after the earthquake. 
Tehnične specifikacije za stanovanja CASE so bile pripravljene in uporabljene šele po potresu.
Therefore, although the CASE apartments were constructed rapidly, the project did not meet the target of accommodating all the affected people before the winter. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
Zato projekt kljub hitri izgradnji stanovanj CASE ni izpolnil cilja nastanitve vseh prizadetih prebivalcev pred zimo. Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
33 RECOMMENDATION 2 In general, and with a view to improving the benefits of the EUSF-financed projects, the Commission should, using the available forums and means (e.g. Structural Funds and dissemination of best practices), promote the Member States’ preparedness to act rapidly and effectively in emergencies. 
33 PRIPOROČILO 2 Na splošno bi morala Komisija zaradi povečanja koristi projektov, financiranih iz SSEU, ob uporabi razpoložljivih forumov in sredstev (npr. strukturnih skladov in razširjanja najboljših praks) spodbujati pripravljenost držav članic na hitro in uspešno odzivanje na nesreče.
The aim of the Commission and the Member States at risk should be to: (a) have up-to-date disaster management plans, which would also ensure the availability of timely and reliable information on the population affected by a natural disaster and the timely identification of sites to be used for temporary accommodation purposes; (b) have pre-identified strategies and solutions that aim to maximise the number of people accommodated in an adequate manner with the limited resources available; (c) have arrangements in place to ensure timely emergency procurement (emergency procedures ensuring reasonable economy, technical specifications, framework contracts and lists of potential contractors). 
Cilj Komisije in držav članic, v katerih obstaja tveganje, bi moral biti, da imajo: (a) posodobljene načrte ravnanja ob nesreči, ki bi morali zagotoviti tudi, da bodo na razpolago pravočasne in zanesljive informacije o prebivalstvu, ki ga je prizadela naravna nesreča, in da bodo pravočasno ugotovljene lokacije, ki bodo uporabljene za začasno nastanitev; (b) vnaprej pripravljene strategije in rešitve, katerih namen je čim bolj povečati število ljudi, ki so ob omejenih razpoložljivih virih ustrezno nastanjeni; (c) vzpostavljene ureditve za zagotovitev pravočasnega nujnega javnega naročanja (nujni postopki, ki zagotavljajo razumno gospodarnost, tehnične specifikacije, okvirne pogodbe in seznami mogočih izvajalcev). Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
Not much attention was paid to economy. 
Gospodarnosti ni bilo namenjene veliko pozornosti.
Although the comparison with standard construction costs is only indicative, the CASE apartments were clearly more expensive than apartments on the market. 
Čeprav je primerjava s standardnimi stroški gradnje le informativna, so bila stanovanja CASE očitno dražja od stanovanj na trgu.
The high cost could be partly explained by the use of high-quality materials and seismic isolators and the need to implement the project rapidly. 
Visoke stroške bi bilo mogoče deloma pojasniti z uporabo visokokakovostnih materialov in potresnih izolatorjev ter potrebo po hitri izvedbi projekta.
A part of the additional cost could, however, have been avoided if more bidders had participated in tenders and more attention had been paid to economy when evaluating the bids. 
Kljub temu pa bi se bilo mogoče izogniti delu dodatnih stroškov, če bi na razpisih sodelovalo več ponudnikov in bi se pri ocenjevanju ponudb namenilo več pozornosti gospodarnosti.
Because of the late start of the procurement procedures, time limits for the submission of tenders were much shorter than normal, to the detriment of the quality of tenders and competition. 
Zaradi poznega začetka postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil so bili roki za predložitev ponudb veliko krajši kot običajno, kar je škodovalo kakovosti ponudb in konkurence.
The lots concerned by negotiated procedures, especially for the supply of concrete, were too big, which contributed to a reduced number of bidders. 
Sklopi, za katere so bili uporabljeni postopki s pogajanji, so bili zlasti pri dobavi betona preveliki, kar je prispevalo k manjšemu številu ponudnikov.
The direct negotiations used for awarding additional works helped to save precious time during project implementation, but did not pay sufficient consideration to economy factors and resulted, for some of the audited contracts, in considerably higher costs for similar results. 
Neposredna pogajanja, ki so se uporabljala pri oddaji dodatnih gradbenih del, so pomagala prihraniti dragoceni čas pri izvedbi projekta, vendar se pri njih niso dovolj upoštevali dejavniki gospodarnosti, kar je pri nekaterih revidiranih pogodbah o oddaji javnega naročila povzročilo veliko višje stroške za podobne rezultate.
The low weighting accorded to the financial offers for the construction of buildings, the use of ineffective technical award criteria and the high weighting accorded to discretionary criteria (e.g. architectonic quality of the buildings and external aspects, energy efficiency and quality of equipment) increased the cost of the apartments. Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
Nizko ponderiranje finančnih ponudb za gradnjo stavb, uporaba neučinkovitih tehničnih meril za dodelitev in visoko ponderiranje diskrecijskih meril (npr. arhitektonske kakovosti stavb in zunanje zasnove, energetske učinkovitosti in kakovosti opreme), so povečali stroške stanovanj. Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
35 RECOMMENDATION 3 In order to improve the economy of future EUSF-financed operations, the Commission should: (a) review Member States’ procurement procedures following natural disasters, in order to identify and disseminate best practices and lessons learnt with regard to emergency procurement; (b) assess whether EUSF grants were used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management, including economy, in order to identify and disseminate best practices and lessons learnt with regard to economy aspects. 
35 PRIPOROČILO 3 Komisija bi morala zaradi izboljšanja gospodarnosti prihodnjih ukrepov, financiranih iz SSEU: (a) pregledati postopke za oddajo javnih naročil držav članic po naravnih nesrečah, da bi glede nujnega javnega naročanja ugotovila in razširjala najboljše prakse in pridobljeno znanje; (b) oceniti, ali so bila nepovratna sredstva iz SSEU porabljena v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, vključno z gospodarnostjo, da bi glede vidikov gospodarnosti ugotovila in razširjala najboljše prakse in pridobljeno znanje.
This Report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mr Harald NOACK, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 12 December 2012. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat II, ki ga vodi g. Harald NOACK, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 12. decembra 2012.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations ANNEX II AUDIT COVERAGE 38 Works/supplies Contracted amount excluding VAT (million euro) Checked amount excluding VAT (million euro) Coverage (%) Laying of concrete, welded steel mesh, realisation of concrete pillars 55,2 0,0 0,0 Supply of concrete 27,3 27,3 100,0 Supply of steel mesh 15,9 0,0 0,0 Supply of steel pillars 37,6 37,6 100,0 Supply of seismic isolators 12,0 11,3 94,0 Excavations 14,5 0,0 0,0 Buildings 425,3 145,0 34,1 Furniture 55,7 28,5 51,2 Civil works (total) 41,2 0,0 0,0 Demolition 0,1 0,0 0,0 Electro-mechanic works 0,2 0,0 0,0 Lifts 9,8 0,0 0,0 Green areas 15,2 0,0 0,0 TOTAL 710,2 249,7 35,2 Note: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. 
Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov PRILOGA II REVIZIJSKA POKRITOST 38 Gradbena dela/dobava Znesek, za katerega so bile sklenjene pogodbe, brez DDV (v milijonih EUR) Pregledani znesek brez DDV (v milijonih EUR) Pokritost (%) Betoniranje, varjena jeklena mreža, postavitev betonskih stebrov 55,2 0,0 0,0 Dobava betona 27,3 27,3 100,0 Dobava jeklene mreže 15,9 0,0 0,0 Dobava jeklenih stebrov 37,6 37,6 100,0 Dobava potresnih izolatorjev 12,0 11,3 94,0 Izkopi 14,5 0,0 0,0 Stavbe 425,3 145,0 34,1 Pohištvo 55,7 28,5 51,2 Komunalna dela (skupaj) 41,2 0,0 0,0 Rušenje 0,1 0,0 0,0 Elektromehanična dela 0,2 0,0 0,0 Dvigala 9,8 0,0 0,0 Zelene površine 15,2 0,0 0,0 SKUPA J 710,2 249,7 35,2 Opomba: Vsota posameznih zneskov se zaradi zaokroževanja lahko razlikuje od seštevka v vrstici „skupaj“.
ANNEX III SEISMIC RISK IN ITALY 
PRILOGA III POTRESNA OGROŽENOST V ITALIJI FB 2012 ALGERIA
Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations CAMPOBASSO ! 
CAMPOBASSO Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov !
40 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. 
40 POVZETEK II.
The implementation agreement lays down — upon a proposal from the beneficiary country — the types of operations for which the EUSF may be used. 
Sporazum o izvajanju na predlog države upravičenke določa vrste ukrepov, za katere se lahko uporabi SSEU.
The allocation of funding to the selected types of operations thus reflects the uncertainty and possible need for adjustment inherent to an emergency situation. 
V dodelitvi sredstev izbranim vrstam ukrepov se zato kažeta negotovost in morebitna potreba po prilagoditvi, ki sta neločljivo povezani z izrednimi razmerami.
The Commission considers that the CASE project under the given circumstances fully corresponded to the conditions and objectives of the EUSF regulation as it responded to an urgent need of thousands of people made homeless by the earthquake by providing temporary accommodation for them until they could return to their own homes. 
Komisija meni, da je bil projekt C.A.S.E. v danih okoliščinah popolnoma skladen s pogoji in cilji uredbe o SSEU ter se je na nujne potrebe več tisoč ljudi, ki so zaradi potresa ostali brez doma, odzval tako, da jim je zagotovil začasno nastanitev, dokler se niso lahko vrnili na svoje domove.
The construction of the CASE blocks for so many people in such short time under the given circumstances was a major achievement and most were available by the end of the year. It was never intended to accommodate the entire homeless population. 
Izgradnja blokov C.A.S.E. za tolikšno število ljudi v tako kratkem času je bila v danih okoliščinah velik dosežek, večina blokov pa je bila na voljo že ob koncu leta.
The project’s total cost was influenced by enormous time pressure, the great number of people to cater for and difficult climatic and geological conditions. 
Na celotne stroške projekta so vplivali ogromen časovni pritisk, veliko število ljudi, za katere je bilo treba poskrbeti, ter zahtevne podnebne in geološke razmere.
V. The Commission will use the opportunity of the forthcoming review of the regulation to clarify the formulation of ‘temporary accommodation’ and address the question of revenue generation. 
V. Komisija bo v okviru bližajočega se pregleda uredbe pojasnila zvezo „začasna nastanitev“ in obravnavala vprašanje ustvarjanja prihodkov.
The European Commission proposals to revise existing European civil protection legislation promote the development of planning instruments prepared by Member States in order to adapt to and mitigate the risks and their impacts cost-effectively. 
Predlogi Komisije za spremembo obstoječe evropske zakonodaje o civilni zaščiti spodbujajo razvoj instrumentov načrtovanja, ki jih pripravijo države članice, da bi se stroškovno učinkovito prilagodile tveganjem in njihovim učinkom ter jih zmanjšale.
The Commission shall support Member States in addressing the capacity gaps and in filling these gaps in the most appropriate and cost-effective way. 
Komisija podpira države članice pri odpravljanju vrzeli v zmogljivostih ter pri njihovem zapolnjevanju na najprimernejši in stroškovno učinkovit način.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Finally, concerning the economy principle, the Commission regularly assesses the implementation of all EUSF grants based on the implementation reports and validity statements submitted by beneficiary countries as well as by own-monitoring and audit missions. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Kar zadeva načelo gospodarnosti, Komisija redno ocenjuje uporabo vseh nepovratnih sredstev iz SSEU na podlagi poročil o izvajanju in izjav o veljavnosti, ki jih predložijo države upravičenke ter njene lastne misije za spremljanje in revizijo.
Where appropriate it draws the necessary conclusions which are presented in its annual reports. 
Po potrebi sprejme potrebne sklepe, ki jih predstavi v svojih letnih poročilih.
Moreover, the Commission has presented a major assessment of the Solidarity Fund in its communication on the future of the Solidarity Fund presented in October 2011, which serves as a basis for the current revision of some provisions of the regulation. 
Poleg tega je Komisija obsežno oceno Solidarnostnega sklada predstavila v svojem sporočilu o prihodnosti Solidarnostnega sklada iz oktobra 2011, ki se uporablja kot podlaga za trenutno revizijo nekaterih določb uredbe o SSEU.
6. 
UVOD 6.
First indent The initial emergency assistance to the population alone amounted to EUR 653 million, thus it was sufficient to cover the EUSF grant of EUR 494 million. 
6., prva alinea Že samo začetna nujna pomoč prebivalstvu je znašala 653 milijonov EUR, kar je torej zadostovalo za pokritje nepovratnih sredstev iz SSEU v višini 494 milijonov EUR.
41 OBSERVATIONS 9. 
41 OPAŽANJA 9.
The European Parliament regularly stresses the regulation’s call for a flexible application of the EUSF. 
Evropski parlament redno poudarja zahtevo iz uredbe o SSEU, da se SSEU uporablja fleksibilno.
For instance, the resolution on natural disasters of 4 September 2007 of the European Parliament1 ‘asks the Commission to mobilise the current EU Solidarity Fund (EUSF) in the most flexible manner possible and without delay, avoiding time-consuming procedures or administrative obstacles’. 
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 4. septembra 2007 o naravnih katastrofah1 na primer „poziva Komisijo, naj na najbolj prožen način in nemudoma mobilizira obstoječi Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije (SSEU) ter se pri tem izogiba zamu-dnim postopkom ali administrativnim oviram“.
In its special report on the Solidarity Fund of 20082 the Court examined especially how rapid, efficient and flexible the Fund was applied in practice. 
Sodišče je v svojem posebnem poročilu o Solidarnostnem skladu iz leta 20082 zlasti preučilo, kako hitro, učinkovito in fleksibilno se je sklad uporabljal v praksi.