natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal of the European Union C 375/189 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Commission’s validation (or recalculation) of the error rates is consistent with the evidence provided by audit authorities 6.57. In relation to five OPs covered by five ACRs, we identified weaknesses that had not been detected or properly addressed by the Commission. 
13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/189 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA Potrditev (ali ponovni izračun) stopenj napake, ki jo izvede Komisija, je skladna z dokazi, ki so jih zagotovili revizijski organi 6.57 Sodišče je v zvezi s petimi operativnimi programi, ki so bili zajeti v petih letnih poročilih o nadzoru, ugotovilo slabosti, ki jih Komisija ni odkrila ali ustrezno obravnavala.
However, we consider that none of these cases should have led the Commission to make additional reservations (or reservations with a higher financial impact) in the 2015 annual activity reports. 
Toda Sodišče meni, da Komisija zaradi nobenega od teh primerov ne bi smela izreči dodatnih pridržkov (ali pridržkov z večjim finančnim vplivom) v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih za leto 2015.
This is so since almost all of these OPs (or group of OPs) are already under reservation for different reasons. 
In sicer zato, ker so za skoraj vse izmed teh operativnih programov (ali skupin operativnih programov) že izrečeni pridržki zaradi drugih razlogov.
Improvements in audit authorities’ checks on state aid and public procurement 6.58. As in previous years, we also examined whether national audit authorities carried out appropriate checks of public procurement and state aid rules. 
Izboljšave pri pregledih državne pomoči in javnega naročanja, ki so jih izvajali revizijski organi 6.58 Tako kot v preteklih letih je Sodišče preučilo tudi to, ali so nacionalni revizijski organi izvedli ustrezne preglede pravil o javnem naročanju in državni pomoči.
We noticed a significant improvement in that area compared to the previous year’s assessment(47) since most of the check lists used by audit authorities in their audit of operations adequately covered compliance with state aid and public procurement rules. 
V primerjavi z oceno v prejšnjem letu(47) smo na tem področju opazili precejšnje izboljšanje, saj so revizijski organi v kontrolne sezname, ki so jih uporabljali pri revizijah operacij, ustrezno zajeli skladnost s pravili o državni pomoči in javnem naročanju.
As a result, for two of the 102 OPs sampled the state aid checks carried out by the audit authorities were inadequate (for example providers of services of general economic interest were not covered or for notified aid schemes and research and development measures the aid intensity was not verified). 
Zato so bili pregledi državne pomoči, ki so jih izvedli revizijski organi, neustrezni pri dveh od 102 operativnih programov v vzorcu (na primer: ponudniki storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena niso bili zajeti ali za priglašene sheme pomoči, raziskovalne in razvojne ukrepe intenzivnost pomoči ni bila preverjena).
For one of these two OPs the public procurement checklist is considered insufficient. 
Pri enem od teh dveh operativnih programov je bil kontrolni seznam v zvezi z javnim naročanjem ocenjen kot nezadosten.
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 6.57. The Commission notes the improvement in the assessment of its verification of errors rates reported by the audit authorities. 
6.57 Komisija ugotavlja izboljšanje pri ocenjevanju preverjanj, ki jih je opravila v zvezi s stopnjami napake, o katerih so poročali revizijski organi.
6.58. Through its own verifications, the Commission also noted the significant improvement reported by the Court. 
6.58 Komisija je v okviru lastnega preverjanja tudi ugotovila bistveno izboljšanje, o katerem poroča Računsko sodišče.
During the ACR review, the Commission examines whether the audit authority’s opinion is solidly grounded on the basis of the results of system and operations audits. 
Komisija pri pregledu letnega poročila o nadzoru preveri, ali mnenje revizijskega organa resnično temelji na rezultatih revizij sistemov in operacij.
The examination of the work of the audit authorities with regards to state aid and public procurement is included, amongst other issues, in the Commission’s review on audit authorities which include an examination of the methodology for system audits and audits of operations (including checklists) as well as re-performing audits already done by audit authorities (see reply to paragraph 6.47). 
Preverjanje dela, ki ga revizijski organi opravljajo v zvezi z državno pomočjo in javnim naročanjem, je poleg drugih vprašanj del pregleda revizijskih organov, ki ga opravi Komisija, in zajema preverjanje metodologije za revizije sistemov in operacij (vključno s kontrolnimi seznami) ter ponovno izvedbo revizij, ki so jih že izvedli revizijski organi (glej odgovor na odstavek 6.47).
In some cases the Commission had already recommended to the audit authorities concerned, through its own audit reporting, to reinforce their checklists to better cover the verification of state aid and public procurement issues. 
V nekaterih primerih je Komisija v okviru lastnega revizijskega poročanja zadevnim revizijskim organom že priporočila, naj izboljšajo svoje kontrolne sezname, da se zagotovi boljša pokritost vprašanj v zvezi z državno pomočjo in javnim naročanjem.
The Commission will continue to ensure that audit authorities use appropriate checklists. 
Komisija bo še naprej zagotavljala, da revizijski organi uporabljajo ustrezne kontrolne sezname.
(47) According to the annual report 2014, the state aid checks were inappropriate for 42 out of 139 examined OPs. 
(47) Po podatkih iz letnega poročila za leto 2014 so bili pregledi v zvezi z državno pomočjo neustrezni pri 42 od 139 operativnih programov, ki jih je preučilo Sodišče.
EN C 375/190 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Commission guidance requires audit authorities to include contributions to financial instruments to the audited population rather than checking the actual disbursements to final recipients 6.59. Financial contributions from the OPs to funds implementing financial instruments for the whole period are generally made through a single payment as soon as the legal structure of the funds has been set up. 
C 375/190 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE V navodilih Komisije se zahteva, da revizijski organi vključijo prispevke finančnim instrumentom v revidirano populacijo, namesto da pregledujejo dejanska izplačila končnim upravičencem 6.59 Finančni prispevki iz operativnih programov za sklade, ki izvajajo finančne instrumente, se na splošno izvedejo z enim plačilom za celo obdobje, takoj ko je vzpostavljena pravna struktura skladov.
Alternative financing arrangements can be specified in the funding agreements. 
Alternativne ureditve financiranja je mogoče določiti v sporazumih o financiranju.
In accordance with regulation, these payments are certified to the Commission as expenditure incurred(48). 
V skladu z uredbo se ta plačila potrdijo Komisiji kot nastali odhodki(48).
In line with the Commission’s guidance to audit authorities on sampling, ex post verification of such payment by audit authorities generally relate to the financial year in which the payment has been made. 
V skladu z navodili Komisije o vzorčenju za revizijske organe se naknadna preverjanja teh plačil, ki jih izvajajo revizijski organi, na splošno nanašajo na proračunsko leto, v katerem je bilo plačilo izvršeno.
These checks generally have a limited scope because within the first year few operations are selected for support and limited amounts are disbursed to final recipients and projects. 
Ti pregledi so na splošno omejeni, saj je v prvem letu malo operacij izbranih za podporo, končnim prejemnikom in projektom pa se izplačajo omejeni zneski.
In line with Article 78(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, the funds’ contribution into financial instruments is included in payment claims to the Commission. 
V skladu s členom 78(6) Uredbe (ES) št.
These payments constitute part of the population to be audited by audit authorities through sample checks in line with the updated Commission guidance. 
Ta plačila predstavljajo del populacije, ki jo bodo revizijski organi revidirali s pregledi vzorcev v skladu s posodobljenimi smernicami Komisije.
The audit framework developed in 2011 for ERDF/CF and ESF clearly foresees that audits should cover the set-up and the implementation of the financial instrument and that specific verifications by closure are envisaged. 
Revizijska strategija, ki je bila razvita leta 2011 za ESRR/KS in ESS, jasno določa, da naj bi revizije zajemale vzpostavitev in izvajanje finančnih instrumentov in da so predvidena specifična preverjanja ob zaključku.
Audit authorities and Commission may carry out thematic audits on financial instruments which cover both the set-up of the fund and the actual implementation of projects through the audit of a sample of projects carried out by final recipients. 
Revizijski organi in Komisija lahko izvajajo tematske revizije finančnih instrumentov, ki zajemajo sestavo sklada in dejansko izvedbo projektov, na podlagi revizije vzorca projektov, ki jih izvajajo končni prejemniki.
By letter of 18 March 2015, the Commission has also clarified to the audit authorities that financial instruments should always be included in the population subject to sampling and has informed them that it considered good practice that these operations are audited as a separate stratum for the purposes of sampling. 
V dopisu z dne 18. marca 2015 je Komisija pojasnila revizijskim organom, da bi morali biti finančni instrumenti vedno vključeni v populacijo vzorčenja, in jih obvestila, da se šteje za dobro prakso, da se te operacije revidirajo kot ločen stratum za namene vzorčenja.
In addition, during the Homologues Group Meeting of September 2015, the Commission discussed with audit authorities the audit approach and audit strategy towards closure. 
Poleg tega je Komisija na sestanku skupine „Homologues' Group“ septembra 2015 razpravljala z revizijskimi organi o revizijskem pristopu in strategiji glede zaključka.
The necessary assurance on financial instruments at closure will be obtained by combining results from system audits carried out during the implementation, audits of a sample of transactions which covered the implementation when this was possible and additional testing by closure to ensure that actual disbursements to final recipients are legal and regular. 
Potrebna zagotovila o finančnih instrumentih ob zaključku bodo pridobljena z združevanjem rezultatov sistemskih revizij, ki se izvajajo med izvedbo, revizij vzorca transakcij, ki so zajemale izvedbo, ko je to bilo mogoče, in dodatnim testiranjem ob zaključku, da se zagotovi, da so dejanska izplačila končnim upravičencem zakonita in redna.
This discussion was systematically followed up in early 2016 in bilateral audit coordination meetings with the concerned Member State’s audit authorities. 
Ta razprava se je sistematično nadaljevala v začetku leta 2016 na usklajevalnih dvostranskih revizijskih sestankih z revizijskimi organi zadevnih držav članic.
Finally, for the purpose of the closure declaration, the audit authorities will have to obtain and provide assurance on the legality and regularity not only of the OP contribution paid into financial instruments but also of the use of this contribution through underlying transactions implemented by the final recipients as listed in Article 78.6 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 6.60. 
Nazadnje, za namene zaključne izjave bodo morali revizijski organi pridobiti in predložiti zagotovilo o zakonitosti in rednosti, ne samo o prispevkih operativnih programov, ki so bili vplačani v finančne instrumente, temveč tudi o uporabi tega prispevka na podlagi transakcij, ki so jih izvedli končni upravičenci, kot je navedeno v členu 78(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
For three OPs the contribution to financial instruments accounts for a considerable part of the the population and of the audited sample. 
6.60 Pri treh operativnih programih predstavlja prispevek za finančne instrumente velik del populacije in revidiranega vzorca.
The audit authorities found these contributions to be free of error. 
Revizijski organi so ugotovili, da ti prispevki nimajo napak.
(48) Article 78a of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
6.59–6.62 (48) Člen 78a Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
In the last two years, we detected the selection of ineligible recipients in some of the instruments audited (see also paragraph 6.44). 
V preteklih dveh letih smo odkrili, da so bili pri nekaterih revidiranih instrumentih izbrani neupravičeni prejemniki (glej tudi odstavek 6.44).
The Commission has not issued a formal horizontal guidance on the audit of the disbursements made from the financial instrument to final recipients up to closure. 
6.62 Komisija ni pripravila formalnih horizontalnih navodil o reviziji izplačil končnim prejemnikom iz finančnih instrumentov do zaključka operativnih programov.
However, the audit approach is agreed upon bilaterally between the Commission and the Member State concerned. 
Toda o revizijskem pristopu se dvostransko dogovorita Komisija in zadevna država članica.
6.63. Where the financial instruments are managed by the European Investment Bank (EIB), audit authorities cannot check the contributions to the fund due to limitations imposed to access rights by EIB. 
6.63 Pri finančnih instrumentih, ki jih upravlja Evropska investicijska banka, revizijski organi ne morejo preveriti prispevkov v sklad zaradi omejitev, ki jih Evropska investicijska banka uporablja za pravice dostopa.
Very low error rates reported by the audit authorities for OPs for which we have found errors 6.64. For 110 of the 440 ERDF/CF and ESF OPs, the Commission has validated error rates below or equal to 0,5 %. 
Revizijski organi so poročali o zelo nizkih stopnjah napake za operativne programe, za katere je Sodišče ugotovilo napake 6.64 Za 110 od 440 operativnih programov ESRR/Kohezijskega sklada in ESS je Komisija potrdila stopnje napake v višini 0,5 % ali manj.
For 16 of these OPs, we performed at least one examination during the last two financial exercises. 
16 od teh operativnih programov je Sodišče v zadnjih dveh proračunskih letih preučilo vsaj enkrat.
For nine OPs we reported quantifiable errors in the projects examined (see paragraphs 6.55 and 6.56). 
Pri devetih operativnih programih je pri preučenih projektih poročalo o količinsko opredeljivih napakah (glej odstavka 6.55 in 6.56).
Examination of the Commission’s annual activity reports 6.65. We assessed the 2015 annual activity reports (AARs) and accompanying declarations of the Directorates-General for Regional and Urban Policy, and Employment Social Affairs and Inclusion (49). 
Preučitev letnih poročil Komisije o dejavnostih 6.65 Sodišče je ocenilo letni poročili o dejavnostih za leto 2015 in spremni izjavi generalnih direktoratov za regionalno in mestno politiko ter za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje (49).
In particular: — we checked the consistency and accuracy of the Commission’s calculation of the amounts at risk; — we assessed the reservations made for 2015. 
Zlasti je: — pregledalo doslednost in točnost izračuna tveganih zneskov, ki ga je pripravila Komisija, — ocenilo pridržke, izrečene za leto 2015.
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES Further discussions between the Commission and the EIB Group should allow managing and audit authorities to have assurance at closure on this specific point. 
Nadaljnji razgovori med Komisijo in skupino EIB naj bi dali organom upravljanja in revizijskim organom zagotovila o tej določeni točki ob zaključku.
6.64. The Commission notes that the fact that individual errors are found in a programme does not prejudge audit results based on statistical samples adequately and randomly selected or samples covering a significant part of the expenditure declared. 
6.64 Komisija ugotavlja, da dejstvo, da so v programu ugotovljene posamezne napake, ne vpliva na revizijske rezultate na podlagi ustrezno in naključno izbranih statističnih vzorcev ali vzorcev, ki pokrivajo velik del prijavljenih izdatkov.
The Commission considers that individual errors reported by the Court do not put in doubt the reliability of the reported and validated error rates in 2015. 6.63. 
Komisija meni, da posamezne napake, ki jih je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče, ne vzbujajo dvomov o zanesljivosti sporočane in potrjene stopnje napake v letu 2015.
(49) By the end of April of every year, each directorate-general prepares an annual activity report for the previous year which is submitted to the European Parliament and the Council and is published. 
6.63 (49) Vsak generalni direktorat pripravi vsako leto do konca aprila letno poročilo o dejavnostih za predhodno leto, ki ga predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ter objavi.
Together with this report, the director-general must provide a statement indicating whether the budget under his or her responsibility has been implemented in a legal and regular way. 
Generalni direktor mora skupaj s poročilom dati izjavo o tem, ali se je proračun, za katerega je odgovoren, izvrševal na zakonit in pravilen način.
This will be the case if the level of irregularities is below the Commission’s own 2% materiality threshold. 
Tako izjavo da, če je stopnja nepravilnosti pod 2-odstotnim pragom pomembnosti, ki ga je določila Komisija.
Otherwise, the director-general may issue full or partial reservations for certain areas (or programmes). 
Če to ne drži, lahko generalni direktor za nekatera področja (ali programe) v celoti ali delno izreče pridržke.
EN C 375/192 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Commission’s calculation of the amounts at risk for ERDF/CF and ESF OPs 6.66. Overall, the Commission’s calculation of the amounts at risk in the 2015 annual activity reports is accurate and consistent with the available information reported and/or provided by the audit authorities. 
C 375/192 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA Izračun tveganih zneskov, ki ga je pripravila Komisija za operativne programe ESRR/Kohezijskega sklada in ESS 6.66 Izračun tveganih zneskov, ki ga je pripravila Komisija, v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih za leto 2015, je dosleden in skladen z razpoložljivimi informacijami, o katerih so poročali in/ali jih zagotovili revizijski organi.
We recall however that the annual error rates reported by the Commission in the annual activity reports are not directly comparable to those estimated by us (50). — the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy estimated that between 3,0 % and 5,6 % of the interim and final payments for ERDF/CF OPs of the 2007-2013 programming period authorised during the year were at risk of error. 
Toda Sodišče opozarja, da letne stopnje napake, o katerih poroča Komisija v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih, niso neposredno primerljive s stopnjami napake, kot jih je ocenilo Sodišče (50). — Generalni direktorat za regionalno in mestno politiko je ocenil, da obstaja tveganje napake pri 3,0 % do 5,6 % vmesnih in končnih plačil za operativne programe ESRR/ Kohezijskega sklada za programsko obdobje 2007–2013, ki so bila odobrena med letom.
63 % of payments made by the Commission were to OPs with a validated error rate above 2 %; — the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion estimated that between 3,0 % and 3,6 % of the interim and final payments for ESF OPs of the 2007-2013 programming period authorised during the year were at risk of error. 
63 % plačil, ki jih je izvedla Komisija, je bilo izvedenih za operativne programe s potrjeno stopnjo napake nad 2 %, — Generalni direktorat za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje je ocenil, da obstaja tveganje napake pri 3,0 % do 3,6 % vmesnih in končnih plačil za operativne programe ESS za programsko obdobje 2007–2013, ki so bila odobrena med letom.
56 % of payments made by the Commission were to OPs with a validated error rate above 2 %. 
56 % plačil, ki jih je izvedla Komisija, je bilo namenjenih operativnim programom s potrjeno stopnjo napake nad 2 %.
Commission’s reservations for ERDF/CF and ESF OPs 6.67. In cohesion policy, the Commission issues reservations on OPs (or groups of OPs) when: — significant weaknesses in the OPs management and control systems have been identified, or — the OPs validated error rate exceeds 5 %. 
Pridržki Komisije za operativne programe ESRR/Kohezijskega sklada in ESS 6.67 Na področju kohezijske politike Komisija izreče pridržke za operativne programe (ali skupine operativnih programov), če: — so bile ugotovljene bistvene slabosti v upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemih operativnih programov ali — potrjena stopnja napake pri operativnem programu presega 5%.
For OPs with a validated error rate between 2 % and 5 %, the Commission also considers whether the OPs ‘cumulative residual risk’ exceeds 2 %. 
Za operativne programe s potrjeno stopnjo napake med 2 % in 5 % Komisija upošteva tudi, ali kumulativno preostalo tveganje presega 2 %.
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 6.66. The Commission agrees that the Court’s error rate and that of the Commission are not directly comparable. 
6.66 Komisija se strinja, da stopnje napake, ki jo ugotovi Računsko sodišče, in stopnje napake, ki jo ugotovi Komisija, ni mogoče neposredno primerjati.
However, the objective of this process is essentially the same, i.e. assessment of the risk to the EU budget in a particular year. 
Vendar je cilj tega postopka v bistvu enak, tj. oceniti tveganje za proračun EU v določenem letu.
The Commission takes into account all the differences quoted by the Court in its special report 16/2013 (see Commission reply to paragraph 11 of this report). 
Komisija pri svoji oceni upošteva vse razlike, ki jih je Računsko sodišče navedlo v posebnem poročilu št. 16/2013 (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 11 navedenega poročila).
Except for these differences, the Commission considers that for the 2015 annual report, as was the case for the last five years in a row for Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion and four years in a row for Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy before this annual report, the result of the Commission’s assessment is in line with the error rates calculated by the Court (see pages 65 and 100 of the respective AARs). 
Komisija meni, da je, razen teh razlik, rezultat njene ocene za letno poročilo za leto 2015, tako kot za GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje v zadnjih petih zaporednih letih ter za GD za regionalno in mestno politiko v štirih zaporednih letih pred tem letnim poročilom, v skladu s stopnjami napake, ki jih je izračunalo Računsko sodišče (glej strani 65 oziroma 100 ustreznih letnih poročil o dejavnostih).
Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy made in 2015 63 % of payments to programmes it assessed at year-end as affected by a material level of error above 2 %, but for the vast majority of these programmes sufficient corrections were made in order to bring the cumulative residual risk below materiality. 
GD za regionalno in mestno politiko je v letu 2015 opravil 63 % plačil za programe, na katera je po njegovi oceni ob koncu leta vplivala pomembna stopnja napake nad 2 %, vendar so bili za veliko večino teh programov izvedeni ustrezni popravki, da se je kumulativno preostalo tveganje zmanjšalo pod prag pomembnosti.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 6.67. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 6.67.
Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion made in 2015 56 % of payments to programmes it assessed at year-end as affected by a material level of error above 2 %, but for the vast majority of these programmes sufficient corrections were made in order to bring the cumulative residual risk below materiality. 
GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje je v letu 2015 opravil 56 % plačil programom, na katera je po njegovi oceni ob koncu leta vplivala pomembna stopnja napake nad 2 %, vendar so bili za veliko večino teh programov izvedeni ustrezni popravki, da se je kumulativno preostalo tveganje zmanjšalo pod prag pomembnosti.