natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission reported significant weaknesses in the systems of two (Italy and Romania) out of the five Member States concerned. 
Komisija je poročala o precejšnjih slabostih v sistemih dveh (Italija in Romunija) od petih zadevnih držav članic.
We reviewed the Commission’s audit work and its compliance with the international auditing standards. 
7.50 Sodišče je pregledalo revizijsko delo Komisije in njegovo skladnost z mednarodnimi revizijskimi standardi.
The five audits which we reviewed were not fully compliant with the standards, and we identified weaknesses in audit supervision and audit documentation. 7.51. 
Pet revizij, ki jih je Sodišče pregledalo, ni bilo v celoti skladnih s standardi, poleg tega je ugotovilo slabosti v nadzoru nad revizijami in revizijski dokumentaciji.
We identified deficiencies in the managing authority’s administrative checks, in particular relating to procurement procedures (see Figure 7.11). of the European Union THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 13.10.2016 The Commission recognised that improvements were required in the areas of audit supervision and documentation, and strengthened its procedures accordingly. 
7.51 Sodišče je poleg tega ponovno izvedlo eno revizijo, ki jo je Komisija opravila v Romuniji. Ugotovilo je pomanjkljivosti v administrativnih pregledih, ki jih upravlja organ upravljanja, zlasti v povezavi s postopki javnega naročanja (glej sliko 7.11).
The files audited predate these changes. 7.50. Figure 7.11 — Procurement deficiencies in Romania We examined a sample of seven procurement procedures, five of which were affected by errors (two public and three private). 
7.50 Slika 7.11 – Pomanjkljivosti na področju naročanja v Romuniji Sodišče je preučilo vzorec sedmih postopkov oddaje naročila in na pet od njih so vplivale napake (dva javna in trije zasebni).
The three private cases were not detected by the Commission. 
Treh zasebnih primerov Komisija ni odkrila.
We also identified deficiencies relating to the project selection procedure in two out of six cases reviewed. 
V dveh od šestih pregledanih primerov je ugotovilo tudi pomanjkljivosti v zvezi s postopkom izbire projektov.
Figure 7.11 — Procurement deficiencies in Romania The standard checklists used by the Commission focus on compliance with public, rather than private, procurement rules. 
Slika 7.11 – Pomanjkljivosti na področju javnega naročanja v Romuniji Standardni kontrolni seznami, ki jih uporablja Komisija, so osredotočeni na skladnost javnih naročil s pravili, in ne zasebnih.
The seven procedures referred to concern both private procurement cases, on the basis of instructions drawn up by the Romanian authorities (five cases) and public procurement cases (two cases relating to technical assistance) where the Commission was already aware of the weaknesses. 
Sedem omenjenih postopkov se nanaša na primere zasebnega naročanja na podlagi navodil, ki so jih sestavili organi Romunije (pet primerov), in na primere javnega naročanja (dva primera v zvezi s tehnično pomočjo), glede katerih je Komisija že bila seznanjena, da obstajajo slabosti.
Furthermore, the Commission had previously identified that there were weaknesses in project selection. 7.52. 
Poleg tega je Komisija že prej ugotovila, da obstajajo slabosti pri izbiri projektov.
On the basis of the 24 audits which it carried out in 2014 and 2015 and which were finalised at the time of our audit, DG MARE proposed two financial corrections. 
7.52 GD MARE je na podlagi 24 revizij, ki jih je opravil v letih 2014 in 2015 in so bile v času naše revizije zaključene, predlagal dva finančna popravka.
Our review of a sample of five of these audits revealed that in two cases (Italy and Romania) the financial corrections did not address all the deficiencies affecting the managing authorities’ internal control systems. 7.52. 
Pri pregledu vzorca petih od teh revizij se je pokazalo, da v dveh primerih (Italija in Romunija) finančni popravki niso obravnavali vseh pomanjkljivosti, ki vplivajo na sisteme notranje kontrole organov upravljanja.
The Commission proposes financial corrections where it identifies significant deficiencies. 
7.52 Komisija predlaga finančne popravke, ko ugotovi pomembne pomanjkljivosti.
It considers that appropriate levels of correction were applied for both Italy and Romania based on its own analysis. 
Na podlagi lastne analize meni, da so bile tako v Italiji kot v Romuniji uporabljene ustrezne stopnje popravkov.
However, for Romania, it will assess the need for additional corrections based on the Court’s findings. 
Vendar bo v primeru Romunije ocenila, ali so glede na ugotovitve Sodišča potrebni dodatni popravki.
The starting point of this assessment is the levels of error reported by the Member States (for each paying agency) in their control statistics. 
Izhodišče te ocene so stopnje napake, ki so jih sporočile države članice (za vsako plačilno agencijo) v okviru svojih kontrolnih statističnih podatkov.
Subsequently, the Commission adjusts those levels of error using mainly the Commission's and the Court's audits carried out in the last three years as well as the certification bodies’ opinions on legality and regularity for the 2015 financial year. 
Komisija nato te stopnje napake prilagodi predvsem z uporabo svojih revizij in revizij Sodišča, opravljenih v zadnjih treh letih, ter mnenj certifikacijskih organov o zakonitosti in pravilnosti za proračunsko leto 2015.
The resulting adjusted error rates (AERs) are then aggregated and used to calculate the total expenditure at risk, i.e. the level of error that the Commission estimates to affect the EU budget. 
Tako dobljene prilagojene stopnje napake se nato agregirajo in uporabijo za izračun skupnih tveganih odhodkov, tj. stopnje napake, ki po oceni Komisije vpliva na proračun EU.
We consider that this is generally a valid approach which can provide sufficient basis for reservations at the level of individual paying agencies. 
Sodišče meni, da je to na splošno ustrezen pristop, ki lahko zagotovi zadostno podlago za pridržke na ravni posamezne plačilne agencije.
However, we highlight the following issues. 7.54. 
Toda Sodišče opozarja na spodaj navedene zadeve.
For the first time in 2015, certification bodies were required to ascertain, on the basis of a representative sample, the legality and regularity of the expenditure for which reimbursement has been requested by the paying agencies from the Commission. 
7.54 Certifikacijski organi so leta 2015 prvič morali na podlagi reprezentativnega vzorca preveriti zakonitost in pravilnost odhodkov, za katere so plačilne agencije zahtevale povračilo od Komisije.
The certification bodies thus represent a key element in the Commission assurance model for the 2014-2020 period. 
Certifikacijski organi so tako ključni element modela zagotovil Komisije za obdobje 2014–2020.
In 2015, DG AGRI could use the opinions of the certification bodies on the legality and regularity only to a very limited extent due to significant weaknesses in methodology and implementation (such as delays in appointing certification bodies in Member States, inadequate audit strategies, too small samples being drawn for substantive testing and insufficient technical skills and legal expertise to detect deficiencies in paying agencies’ administrative and on-the-spot checks). 7.55. 
Leta 2015 je GD AGRI mnenja certifikacijskih organov v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo lahko uporabljal le v zelo omejenem obsegu zaradi bistvenih slabosti v metodologiji in izvajanju (na primer zamude pri imenovanju certifikacijskih organov v državah članicah, neustrezne revizijske strategije, premajhen vzorec za preizkušanje podatkov in nezadostno tehnično in pravno znanje za odkrivanje pomanjkljivosti administrativnih pregledov in pregledov na kraju samem, ki jih izvajajo plačilne agencije).
The Commission made adjustments to determine the AER on the part of expenditure for which its own or our audit results were available. 
7.55 Komisija je uporabila prilagoditve, da bi ugotovila prilagojeno stopnjo napake za del odhodkov, za katerega so bili na voljo rezultati njenih ali naših revizij.
However, DG AGRI did not disclose in its AAR which part of the expenditure was not adjusted because no such audit results were available. 
Vendar GD AGRI v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih ni razkril, kateri del odhodkov ni bil prilagojen, ker taki rezultati revizij niso bili na voljo.
In such cases, the Commission places reliance on Member States control statistics which may result in an underestimated AER. of the European Union THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES C 375/231 7.54. 
V takih primerih se Komisija opira na kontrolne statistične podatke držav članic, kar lahko privede do podcenjene prilagojene stopnje napake.
Nevertheless, a number of encouraging messages and lessons for the future can be taken from the 2015 exercise. 
Kljub temu se lahko iz dejavnosti v letu 2015 črpa veliko spodbud in izkušenj za prihodnost.
7.55. The Commission examines the situation for each paying agency not only based on its own and the Court’s audit findings over the three previous years, but also on the basis of the opinions received for the financial year concerned from the certification body for each paying agency. 
7.55 Komisija stanje za vsako plačilno agencijo pregleda na podlagi ugotovitev lastnih revizij in revizij Sodišča v zadnjih treh letih ter na podlagi mnenj certifikacijskega organa, ki jih prejeme za zadevno finančno leto v zvezi z vsako plačilno agencijo.
There are therefore audit results available in all cases. 
Tako so rezultati revizij na voljo v vseh primerih.
For the first time in 2015, certification bodies were requested to provide an opinion on the legality and regularity of underlying transactions, which provided even more details and information relevant for deciding on adjusting the reported error rates. 
V letu 2015 se je od certifikacijskih organov prvič zahtevalo, da predložijo mnenje o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij, s čimer je bilo zagotovljenih še več podrobnosti in informacij, ki so pomembne za odločitev, ali je treba sporočene stopnje napak prilagoditi.
Main spending area EAGF EAFRD Source: European Court of Auditors based on DG AGRI annual activity reports. 
Glavno področje porabe EKJS EKSRP Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi letnih poročil o dejavnostih GD AGRI.
The Commission explained that this reduction of the adjusted error rate is largely caused by: — improvements in the Member States’ control systems as a result of remedial actions implemented as from the 2014 claim year; — more up-to-date information available to the Commission allowing a reduction of previously calculated adjustments. 
V letnem poročilu o dejavnostih je za EKJS navedeno, ODGOVORI KOMISIJE — — izboljšav v kontrolnih sistemih držav članic zaradi popravljalnih ukrepov, ki se izvajajo od leta predložitve zahtevkov 2014, tega, da so Komisiji na voljo bolj posodobljene informacije, ki omogočajo znižanje prej izračunanih prilagoditev.
The factors mentioned by the Court have positively impacted the evolution of the adjusted error rate. 
7.57 Dejavniki, ki jih je omenilo Sodišče, so imeli pozitiven učinek na razvoj prilagojene stopnje napake.
The Commission considers that an increase in the average level of the reported errors proves that the Member States’ management and control system work better at detecting and reporting errors. 
Komisija meni, da zvišanje sporočene povprečne stopnje napake dokazuje, da sistemi upravljanja in nadzora v državah članicah v zvezi z odkrivanjem in sporočanjem napak bolje delujejo.
It follows that the reported error rate is considered more reliable and therefore fewer adjustments are needed. 
To pomeni, da je sporočena stopnja napake zanesljivejša, zato je potrebnih manj prilagoditev.
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 7.59. For EAFRD, the Commission almost tripled the average level of error reported by the Member States of 1,78% to calculate the adjusted error rate of 4,99 %. 
13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/233 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 7.59 Komisija je za EKSRP skoraj potrojila povprečno stopnjo napake v višini 1,78 %, ki so jo sporočile države članice, in izračunala prilagojeno stopnjo napake v višini 4,99%.
The Commission has adjusted the error rates reported by 56 paying agencies out of 72 declaring EAFRD expenditure. 
Komisija je prilagodila stopnje napake za 56 od 72 plačilnih agencij, ki so prijavile odhodke EKSRP.
We consider the adjusted error rate of 4,99 % to be broadly in line with our estimated level of error. 
Sodišče meni, da je 4,99-odstotna prilagojena stopnja napake na splošno skladna z njegovo ocenjeno stopnjo napake.
The Commission has in recent years increased the number of its conformity audits of EAFRD expenditure and also launched horizontal audits targeting measures/paying agencies with similar risks. 
Komisija je v zadnjih letih povečala število svojih revizij skladnosti za odhodke EKSRP in začela izvajati tudi horizontalne revizije, usmerjene v ukrepe/ plačilne agencije s podobnimi tveganji.
An example is an audit of public procurement which contributed to overall reservations being made for Germany and Spain. 7.60. 
Primer je revizija javnih naročil, ki je prispevala k splošnima pridržkoma, izrečenima za Nemčijo in Španijo.
The Commission defines corrective capacity as a mechanism for correcting the errors made and protecting the EU budget. 
7.60 Komisija določi popravno zmogljivost kot mehanizem za popravljanje storjenih napak in zaščito proračuna EU.
The annual increase in the calculated corrective capacity for EAGF (to 1,72 %) and for EAFRD (to 2,98 %) is the result of recent efforts by the Commission’s to reduce the number of old open conformity audits (see paragraph 7.34). 
Letno povečanje izračunane popravne zmogljivosti za EKJS (na 1,72 %) in za EKSRP (na 2,98%) je posledica nedavnih prizadevanj Komisije za zmanjšanje števila starih odprtih revizij skladnosti (glej odstavek 7.34).
This affected the overall amount of the financial corrections adopted, especially in 2015. 
To je vplivalo na celotni znesek sprejetih finančnih popravkov, zlasti v letu 2015.
The Commission corrective capacity is calculated on the basis of a three year average of the financial corrections received and has no direct link with the 2015 expenditure which will be corrected in the years to come. 
7.61 Popravna zmogljivost Komisije se izračuna na podlagi triletnega povprečja prejetih finančnih popravkov in ni neposredno povezana z odhodki za leto 2015, ki bodo popravljeni v prihodnjih letih.
This explains this year’s anomaly that the Commission reports its corrective capacity for EAGF expenditure to be higher than the adjusted error rate. 
To pojasnjuje letošnjo anomalijo, da je Komisija poročala, da je njena popravna zmogljivost za odhodke EKJS višja od prilagojene stopnje napake.
For EAFRD, there is no assurance that the remaining financial risk will be below materiality by the end of the programming period. 
Za EKSRP ni zagotovila, da se bo preostalo finančno tveganje do konca programskega obdobja toliko zmanjšalo, da bo pod pragom pomembnosti.
The Commission confirms this in its 2015 AAR (43). DG MARE’s annual activity report 7.62. 
Komisija je to v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2015 potrdila (43).
We examined DG MARE’s 2015 annual activity report, focusing on whether all substantial information was disclosed, whether the information provided was in line with our own findings, and whether the estimations used by the Commission to calculate the error rates were reasonable. of the European Union THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES C 375/233 7.60. 7.61. 
Letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD MARE 7.62 Sodišče je preučilo letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD MARE za leto 2015, pri čemer se je osredotočilo na to, ali so bile razkrite vse bistvene informacije, ali so predložene informacije v skladu z ugotovitvami Sodišča in ali so ocene, ki jih je Komisija uporabila za izračun stopenj napake, razumne.
The corrective capacity and the adjusted error rate are two estimates which provide together an indicator of the assurance on the effectiveness of the multiannual control system in protecting the EU budget. 
7.60 7.61 Popravna zmogljivost in prilagojena stopnja napake sta dve oceni, ki skupaj zagotavljata kazalnik zagotovila o učinkovitosti večletnega nadzornega sistema za zaščito proračuna EU.
In its 2015 annual activity report, the Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development gives assurance for the 2015 CAP expenditure as a whole, taking into account both the adjusted error rate and the corrective capacity. 
V letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2015 je Generalni direktor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja dal zagotovilo za odhodke SKP v letu 2015 kot celoto, pri čemer je upošteval prilagojeno stopnjo napake in popravno zmogljivost.
The corrective capacity is an estimate of the amounts of future corrections calculated as a historical average of the net financial corrections as explained in the Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development’s 2015 annual activity report. 
Popravna zmogljivost je ocena zneskov prihodnjih popravkov, ki se izračunajo na podlagi zgodovinskega povprečja neto finančnih popravkov, kakor je pojasnjeno v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja za leto 2015.
(43) DG AGRI AAR 2015, paragraph 3.3: ‘Taking into account the need to balance legality and regularity with the achievements of policy objectives while bearing in mind the delivery costs, it cannot be expected with any real certainty that a remaining financial risk below 2% would be attainable with reasonable efforts for Rural Development’. 
(43) Odstavek 3.3 letnega poročila o dejavnostih GD AGRI za leto 2015: Ob upoštevanju tega, da je treba ohranjati ravnotežje med zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo ter doseganjem ciljev politike, ob tem pa upoštevati stroške dostave, ni mogoče realno pričakovati, da bo na področju razvoja podeželja z razumnim prizadevanjem mogoče doseči preostalo finančno tveganje, nižje od 2 %.
This material amount is not disclosed in the AAR. 
Ta pomemben znesek ni razkrit v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih.
The AAR includes reservations for five Member States, including Romania, which is in line with our audit findings. 
V letnem poročilu o dejavnostih so pridržki za pet držav članic, vključno z Romunijo, kar je v skladu z revizijskimi ugotovitvami Sodišča.
Our audit did not call into question the calculation of the error rates by DG MARE. Conclusion and recommendations The conclusion for 2015 7.64. 
Revizija, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, ni povzročila dvoma o izračunu stopenj napake GD MARE.
Overall evidence indicates that spending on ‘Natural resources’ and on both areas subject to a specific assessment (see paragraphs 7.13 and 7.21) is affected by a material level of error. 7.65. 
Zaključek in priporočila Zaključek za leto 2015 7.64 Splošni dokazi kažejo, da na porabo za naravne vire in obe področji, za kateri je bila opravljena posebna ocena (glej odstavka 7.13 in 7.21), vpliva pomembna stopnja napake.
For this MFF heading area, testing of transactions indicates that the estimated level of error present in the population is 2,9 % (see Annex 7.1). 
7.65 Za področje tega razdelka večletnega finančnega okvira preizkušanje transakcij kaže, da ocenjena stopnja napake v populaciji znaša 2,9 % (glej Prilogo 7.1).
Recommendations 7.66. Annex 7.2 shows the result of our review of progress in addressing recommendations made in previous annual reports. 
Priporočila 7.66 V Prilogi 7.2 so prikazani rezultati pregleda, ki ga je Sodišče izvedlo v zvezi z napredkom pri izvajanju priporočil iz prejšnjih letnih poročil.
In the 2012 and 2013 annual reports, the Court presented 20 recommendations. 
V letnih poročilih za leti 2012 in 2013 je Sodišče predstavilo 20 priporočil.
The Commission and the Member States fully implemented four recommendations, while five were implemented in most respects and 10 in some respects. 
Komisija in države članice so v celoti izvedle štiri priporočila, pet jih je bilo izvedenih večinoma, deset pa deloma.
7.67. Following this review and the findings and conclusions for 2015, we recommend that the Commission, for EAGF: — Recommendation 1: continue its efforts to follow up on cases where national legislation is not compliant with EU legislation, including all legal means at its disposal, in particular suspension of payments (see paragraph 7.20 and Figure 7.5); of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 7.63. 
7.67 Glede na ta pregled ter ugotovitve in zaključke za leto 2015 Sodišče Komisiji za EKJS priporoča: — priporočilo 1: naj si še naprej prizadeva za ukrepanje v primerih, v katerih nacionalna zakonodaja ni v skladu z zakonodajo EU, vključno z vsemi pravnimi sredstvi, ki jih ima na voljo, zlasti ustavitvijo plačil (glej odstavek 7.20 in sliko 7.5), 7.63 Ta znesek ni bil razkrit, saj Komisija meni, da pri njem ne obstaja tveganje.
A recovery order has been issued for one of the three programmes, for the amount anticipated. 
Pri enem od treh programov je bil za predvideni znesek izdan nalog za izterjavo.
For the remaining two programmes, when the annual activity report was drawn up the Member State and the Directorate General for Maritime Affaires and Fisheries already largely agreed on the amounts to be recovered by the Commission. 
Za ostala dva programa sta se država članica in Generalni direktorat za pomorske zadeve in ribištvo v času priprave letnega poročila o dejavnostih v veliki meri že dogovorila o znesku, ki ga bo izterjala Komisija.
Any adjustments to this amount (and the associated financial risk) will therefore be minimal. 
Prilagoditve tega zneska (in povezano finančno tveganje) bodo tako minimalne.
7.65. The Commission takes note of the most likely error estimated by the Court which is broadly the same as last year excluding cross-compliance. 
7.65 Komisija je seznanjena z najverjetnejšo napako, kakor jo je ocenilo Sodišče, ki je v glavnem enaka kot lansko leto, brez upoštevanja navzkrižne skladnosti.
The Commission takes note of the latest assessment made by the Court of the progress in addressing recommendations made in previous annual reports. 
7.66 Komisija je seznanjena z najnovejšo oceno Sodišča o napredku pri izvajanju priporočil iz preteklih letnih poročil.
The Commission will continue working with the Member States to further improve the way they follow up the Court’s recommendations. The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Komisija bo še naprej sodelovala z državami članicami, da bi se način, kako ukrepajo na podlagi priporočil Sodišča, še izboljšal.
The Commission considers that it is being implemented by means of its ongoing audit work and the provision of guidance when required and takes the necessary steps in the context of shared management to assist the Member State audit bodies to discharge their tasks effectively. 
Komisija meni, da se to priporočilo že izvaja s tekočimi revizijami in po potrebi z zagotavljanjem smernic, ter sprejema potrebne ukrepe v okviru deljenega upravljanja, da bi revizijskim organom držav članic pomagala pri učinkovitem izvrševanju njihovih nalog.
In addition, shortcomings in Member States management and control systems are addressed through targeted and comprehensive action plans where necessary. 
Poleg tega se pomanjkljivosti upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov držav članic po potrebi obravnavajo z usmerjenimi in celovitimi akcijskimi načrti.
When the Commission detects such problems during the course of its monitoring or audits, they request the Member State to take remedial actions. 
Ko Komisija v sklopu nadzora ali revizij odkrije take težave, od države članice zahteva popravljalne ukrepe.
Where the problem is particularly acute, the Member State is required to implement a remedial action plan which is closely followed by the services. 
Če je težava še posebno velika, mora država članica izvesti popravljalni akcijski načrt, ki ga službe Komisije podrobno spremljajo.
So far such plans have been found to be very effective. 
Doslej so se taki načrti izkazali za zelo uspešne.