natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Actively promoting EMAS could provide an opportunity for delegations to lead by example and to demonstrate that it can also be useful for small organisations5. 
Dejavno spodbujanje sistema EMAS bi lahko delegacijam dalo priložnost, da bi bile zgled in dokaz, da je sistem lahko koristen tudi za majhne organizacije5.
Nevertheless, the Washington DC and Tanzania delegations provided examples of good practice (see Box 1). 3 EEAS 2013 discharge — answers by the EEAS to the written questions. 
Kljub temu sta delegaciji v Washingtonu in Tanzaniji prikazali primere dobre prakse (glej okvir 1); 3 Razrešnica ESZD za leto 2013 – odgovori ESZD na pisna vprašanja.
4 Court of Auditors Special Report No 14/2014, ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’ (http://eca.europa.eu). 
4 Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 14/2014 – Kako institucije in organi EU izračunajo, zmanjšujejo in izravnavajo svoje emisije toplogrednih plinov? (htpp://eca.europa.eu).
5 The European Commission has published an ‘EMAS toolkit for small organisations’ and promotes a standardised methodology called ‘EMAS easy’. 
5 Evropska komisija je objavila zbirko orodij EMAS za majhne organizacije in spodbuja standardizirano metodologijo, imenovano „EMAS easy“.
Improving environmental impact in Washington DC and Tanzania In 2012, the Washington DC delegation joined other diplomatic missions in Washington DC in a pledge to pursue policies aimed at improving environmental quality. 
Izboljšanje okoljskega vpliva v Washingtonu in Tanzaniji Leta 2012 se je delegacija v Washingtonu pridružila drugim diplomatskim misijam v Washingtonu pri zavezi k izvajanju politik za boljšo kakovost okolja.
The delegation had already led the way in obtaining the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold award for its new office premises leased in Washington DC, an example that the landlord of the building subsequently followed by obtaining LEED gold certification for the remainder of the building in 2013. 
Delegacija je že prevzela pobudo in osvojila zlato priznanje okoljskega programa LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) za svoje nove pisarniške prostore, ki jih je najela v Washingtonu, in s tem postavila zgled lastniku stavbe, ki je nato leta 2013 pridobil zlati certifikat programa LEED še za preostanek stavbe.
In Tanzania, the EEAS owns part of an office building together with Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. 
V Tanzaniji je ESZD skupaj z Nemčijo, Nizozemsko in Združenim kraljestvom lastnica dela pisarniške stavbe.
The building is managed by a Joint Management Committee, which produces an annual management report. 
Stavbo upravlja skupni upravni odbor, ki pripravi letno poročilo o upravljanju.
The annual management report contains an analysis comparing monthly consumption of electricity, diesel and water for the previous 3 years in order to identify areas for possible future savings. (c) Accessibility for disabled people. Sometimes local requirements have to be met. 
To vsebuje analizo primerjave mesečne porabe električne energije, dizelskega goriva in vode v preteklih treh letih, da se ugotovi, na katerih področjih bi bili v prihodnosti mogoči prihranki. (c) dostopnost za invalide: včasih morajo biti izpolnjene lokalne zahteve.
This was the case for office renovations in Turkey and Washington DC. 
Tako je bilo pri prenovi pisarn v Turčiji in Washingtonu.
Moreover, health and safety inspections by the EEAS (see paragraph 49(b)) check the accessibility of premises for disabled people. 
Poleg tega se dostopnost prostorov za invalide preverja v okviru zdravstvenih in varnostnih inšpekcijskih pregledov ESZD (glej odstavek 49(b)).
Observations 14 10 The Headquarters Infrastructure Division monitors the health and safety, security and general status of each Delegation office building6. 
Opažanja 14 10 Oddelek za infrastrukturo pri sedežu spremlja stanje v zvezi z zdravjem in zaščito, varnostjo in splošno stanje pisarniških stavb vseh delegacij6.
The average condition of office buildings in 2014 was satisfactory (rated 3.7 out of 5) but there were deficiencies in some delegations7 (see Figure 4). 
Povprečno stanje pisarniških stavb je bilo v letu 2014 zadovoljivo (ocenjeno z oceno 3,7 od 5), vendar so v nekaterih delegacijah7 obstajale pomanjkljivosti (glej sliko 4).
6 The assessment of the condition of an office building combines three criteria rated from 0 (unusable) to 5 (excellent): health and safety (including structure, technical equipment, etc.), security and general status (functionality/ image/location). 
6 Pri oceni stanja pisarniških stavb se uporabljajo tri merila z ocenami od 0 (neuporabno) do 5 (odlično): zdravje in zaščita (vključno s strukturo, tehnično opremo itd.), varnost in splošno stanje (funkcionalnost/podoba/ lokacija).
7 The four delegations assessed as being in the worst condition in 2014 were India, Egypt, Senegal and Sri Lanka. 
7 Štiri delegacije, ki so bile za svoje stanje v letu 2014 najslabše ocenjene, so delegacija v Indiji, Egiptu, Senegalu in na Šrilanki.
Condition of delegation office buildings (5 = excellent) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 Source: European Court of Auditors based on EEAS data. 
Stanje pisarniških stavb delegacij (5 = odlično) 5,0 4,5 4,0 3,5 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi podatkov ESZD.
Delegation office buildings Rented Purchased before 2000 Purchased after 2000 Condition of office buildings Figure 4 
Pisarniške stavbe delegacij najete kupljene pred letom 2000 kupljene po letu 2000 Stanje pisarniških stavb Slika 4
Observations 15 11 The assessment by headquarters was supported by the findings of our survey. 
Opažanja 15 11 Oceno, ki jo je opravil sedež, so potrdile ugotovitve naše ankete.
Most respondents considered that delegation offices meet their needs in terms of location, facilitation of working relationships with partners, working conditions, image, security and space (see Figure 5). 
Večina anketirancev je odgovorila, da pisarne delegacije zadostujejo njihovim potrebam v smislu lokacije, omogočanja delovnih odnosov s partnerji, delovnih pogojev, podobe, varnosti in površine (glej sliko 5).
Over 90 % considered that the location is suitable. 
Več kot 90 % jih je menilo, da je lokacija ustrezna.
However, a quarter of respondents considered that security, image and working conditions are not appropriate. 
Vendar pa je četrtina anketirancev menila, da varnost, podoba in delovni pogoji niso ustrezni.
Suitability of delegation office buildings 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Location Facilitates relations Working conditions Image Security Enough space Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations. 
Ustreznost pisarniških stavb delegacij 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% nezadovoljivo zadovoljivo lokacija olajšuje odnose delovni pogoji podoba varnost dovolj prostora Vir: Revizijska anketa za vodje administracije v delegacijah EU.
Respondents Figure 5 
Anketiranci Slika 5
Observations 16 Residences 12 The residence of the head of delegation is provided by the EEAS. 
Opažanja 16 Rezidence 12 Rezidence vodij delegacij zagotavlja ESZD.
It has a double function: it is the private home as well as the venue for official receptions. 
Rezidenca ima dvojno funkcijo: je zasebno prebivališče in tudi prostor za uradne sprejeme.
Normally, the residence should not change when the head of delegation changes. 
Kadar se vodja delegacije zamenja, se rezidenca običajno ne bi smela spremeniti.
The building policy states that it should have a representative image, should not be excessively ostentatious and should provide best value for money. 
Stavbna politika določa, da morajo imeti rezidence reprezentativno podobo, da niso pretirano razkošne in da so stroškovno učinkovite.
The location of the residence and the steps taken to ensure its safety should take into account the security situation in the host country. 
Pri lokaciji rezidence in ukrepih, sprejetih za zagotovitev njene varnosti, je treba upoštevati varnostne razmere v državi gostiteljici.
13 Most respondents to our survey considered that residences of heads of delegation meet needs in terms of security, location, image, facilitation of relationships with partners, condition and space (see Figure 6). 
13 Večina anketirancev je menila, da rezidence vodij delegacij zadostujejo potrebam glede varnosti, lokacije, podobe, omogočanje lažjih odnosov s partnerji, stanja in površine (glej sliko 6).
However, a quarter of respondents considered that the head of delegation’s residence does not provide enough space and that the condition of the residence is not satisfactory. 
Vendar je četrtina anketirancev menila, da imajo rezidence vodij delegacij premajhno površino in da stanje rezidenc ni zadovoljivo.
Suitability of residences of heads of delegation 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Security Location Image Facilitates relations Building condition Enough space Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations. 
Ustreznost rezidenc vodij delegacij 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% nezadovoljivo zadovoljivo varnost lokacija podoba olajšuje odnose stanje stavbe dovolj prostora Vir: Revizijska anketa za vodje administracije v delegacijah EU.
Respondents Figure 6 
Anketiranci Slika 6
Observations 17 14 The surface area of the residence should be a maximum of 600 m2 (see paragraph 22). 
Opažanja 17 14 Površina rezidence bi morala znašati največ 600 m2 (glej odstavek 22).
The surface area of the residence and the surrounding land should be in the range of the size of residences of ambassadors of Member States in the same country8. 
Površina rezidence in pripadajočega zemljišča bi morala biti v razponu velikosti rezidenc veleposlanikov držav članic v isti državi8.
Over 40 % of respondents to the survey considered that the head of delegation’s residence provides less space than most embassy residences. 
Več kot 40 % anketirancev je menilo, da imajo rezidence vodij delegacij manjšo površino od večine rezidenc veleposlani-štev.
The average surface area of EU delegation residences in 2014 was 488 m2 (see Figure 7). 
Povprečna površina rezidenc delegacij EU v letu je leta 2014 znašala 488 m2 (glej sliko 7).
There were some 40 residences (30 %) under 400 m2. 
Približno 40 rezidenc (30 %) je imelo površino pod 400 m2.
8 EEAS building policy: Residences — policy and selection. 
8 Stavbna politika ESZD: rezidence – politika in izbira.
Surface area (m2) of residences m2 1 400 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 Source: European Court of Auditors based on EEAS data. Recommended maximum (600 m2) Average (488 m2) Delegation residences Figure 7 
Površina (m2) rezidenc m2 1 400 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi podatkov ESZD. priporočeno največ (600 m2) povprečno (488 m2) Rezidence delegacij Slika 7
Observations 18 15 The Headquarters Infrastructure Division monitors the condition9 of delegation residences (see Figure 8). 
Opažanja 18 15 Oddelek za infrastrukturo pri sedežu spremlja stanje9 rezidenc delegacij (glej sliko 8).
The average condition of residences in 2014 was 4.6 out of 5. 
Povprečno stanje rezidenc v letu 2014 je bilo ocenjeno z oceno 4,6 od 5.
This is higher than the average condition of offices, rated 3.7 out of 5 (see paragraph 10). 
Ta ocena je višja od ocene povprečnega stanja pisarn, ki je bila 3,7 od 5 (glej odstavek 10).
9 The assessment of the condition of a head of delegation’s residence combines three criteria rated from 0 (unusable) to 5 (excellent): health and safety (including structure, technical equipment, etc.), security and general status (functionality/ image/location). 
9 Pri oceni stanja rezidenc vodij delegacij se uporabljajo tri merila z ocenami od 0 (neuporabno) do 5 (odlično): zdravje in zaščita (vključno s strukturo, tehnično opremo itd.), varnost in splošno stanje (funkcionalnost/podoba/ lokacija).
The EEAS has no data on the condition of 53 residences (see paragraph 57(b)). 
ESZD nima podatkov o stanju 53 rezidenc (glej odstavek 57 (b)).
Condition of residences (5 = excellent) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Source: European Court of Auditors based on EEAS data. 
Stanje rezidenc (5 = odlično) 5,0 4,5 4,0 3,5 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi podatkov ESZD.
Delegation residences Rented Purchased before 2000 Purchased after 2000 Condition of residences Figure 8 
Rezidence delegacij najete kupljene pred letom 2000 kupljene po letu 2000 Stanje rezidenc Slika 8
Observations 19 Staff accommodation 16 The EEAS manages accommodation for around 2 400 staff in delegations10 through the following two methods provided for in the Staff Regulations. (a) EU delegations provide accommodation free of charge for around 1 400 staff. 
Opažanja 19 Stanovanja zaposlenih 16 ESZD upravlja stanovanja približno 2 400 zaposlenih v delegacijah10 z uporabo dveh metod, ki sta določeni v kadrovskih predpisih: (a) delegacije EU zagotovijo brezplačna stanovanja približno 1 400 zaposlenim.
With a few exceptions, this accommodation is rented rather than owned. 
Z nekaj izjemami so to najeta in ne lastniška stanovanja.
Since January 2014 EU delegations have been able to provide accommodation on this basis mainly in high-risk countries or in countries where rental market conditions make it difficult to find suitable accommodation11. (b) EU delegations reimburse the cost of accommodation rented by around 1 000 staff. 
Od januarja 2014 lahko delegacije EU zagotovijo stanovanja na tej podlagi predvsem v državah z visokim tveganjem ali v državah, kjer je zaradi razmer na najemniškem trgu težko najti ustrezno stanovanje11; (b) delegacije EU povrnejo stroške najema stanovanj približno 1 000 zaposlenim.
17 In both cases, the rent paid or reimbursed by the delegation is limited by a rental ceiling drawn up for each place of employment outside the EU. 
17 V obeh primerih je najemnina, ki jo delegacija plača ali povrne, omejena z zgornjo mejo za najemnine, določeno za vsak kraj zaposlitve zunaj EU posebej.
This ceiling is based on the composition of the staff member’s family and takes into account the local rental market. 
Ta zgornja meja temelji na sestavi družine zaposlenega, pri njej pa se upošteva tudi lokalni najemniški trg.
18 The EEAS building policy states that accommodation of expatriate staff should comply with EEAS security standards, for example it should be located in permitted areas only. 
18 Na podlagi stanovanjske politike ESZD morajo biti stanovanja zaposlenih na delu v tujini v skladu z varnostnimi standardi ESZD, na primer, stanovanja bi morala biti samo na dovoljenih območjih.
It should also reflect an appropriate image of the EU12. 
Poleg tega bi morala odražati ustrezno podobo EU12.
19 Respondents to our survey expressed a high level of satisfaction with staff accommodation. 
19 Anketiranci so izrazili visoko stopnjo zadovoljstva s stanovanji zaposlenih.
Around 90 % of respondents considered that the security, space, location and living conditions of staff accommodation are suitable (see Figure 9). 
Približno 90 % anketirancev je menilo, da so varnost, površina, lokacija in bivalni pogoji stanovanj zaposlenih ustrezni (glej sliko 9).
10 All staff in delegations except local employees. 
10 Vsi zaposleni v delegacijah razen lokalnih uslužbencev.
11 Decision of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 17.12.2013 regarding the rules for the implementation of housing policy in EU delegations (HR DEC(2013) 011). 
11 Sklep visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko z dne 17.12.2013 o pravilih za izvajanje stanovanjske politike v delegacijah EU (HR DEC(2013) 011).
12 EEAS building policy: Accommodation policy for officials serving in third countries. 
12 Stavbna politika ESZD: politika nastanitve uradnikov, ki delajo v tretjih državah.
Observations 20 Suitability of staff accommodation in delegations 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Security Space Location Living conditions Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations. 
Opažanja 20 Ustreznost stanovanj zaposlenih v delegacijah 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% nezadovoljivo zadovoljivo varnost površina lokacija bivalni pogoji Vir: Revizijska anketa za vodje administracije v delegacijah EU.
Respondents Figure 9 
Anketiranci Slika 9
Observations 21 Space in most office buildings, and some residences, exceeds the building policy ceilings Average space per person in delegation offices exceeds the building policy ceiling 20 The EEAS building policy recommends that delegation offices should have a maximum size of 35 m2 per person (the maximum in the building policy before 2013 was 42 m2)13. 
Opažanja 21 Površina večine pisarniških stavb in tudi nekaterih rezidenc presega zgornje meje stavbne politike Povprečna površina na osebo v pisarnah delegacij presega zgornjo mejo, določeno v stavbni politiki 20 Stavbna politika ESZD priporoča, naj pisarne delegacij obsegajo največ 35 m2 na osebo (na podlagi stavbne politike so lahko pred letom 2013 obsegale največ 42 m2)13.
The calculation is based on all areas (not only offices but also common areas) divided by all permanent posts, except for posts which do not need an office (e.g. drivers). 
Osnova za izračun so vse površine (ne le pisarne, ampak tudi skupni prostori), razdeljene na vsa stalna delovna mesta, razen delovnih mest, za katera pisarna ni potrebna (npr. vozniki).
The building policy provides for the exclusion of certain areas from the calculation such as an additional conference room to meet the needs of the presidency function under the Lisbon Treaty. 
Stavbna politika določa, da se nekatere površine izključijo iz izračuna, na primer dodatna konferenčna soba za potrebe funkcije predsedstva na podlagi Lizbonske pogodbe.
New delegation offices should consist of a mixture of individual offices, shared offices for 2-4 people and open-space areas. 
Nove pisarne delegacij bi morale biti sestavljene iz mešanice individualnih pisarn, skupnih pisarn za dve do štiri osebe in odprtih prostorov.
Individual offices should be reserved for a small number of staff whose function requires one. 
Individualne pisarne bi morale biti rezervirane za majhno število zaposlenih, katerih funkcija to zahteva.
21 In 2014, some 85 delegations exceeded the maximum space of 35 m2 per person14. The average space per person was 41 m2 (see Figure 10)15. 
21 Leta 2014 je približno 85 delegacij presegalo največjo dovoljeno površino na osebo (ki je znašala 35 m2)14: površina na osebo je v povprečju znašala 41 m2 (glej sliko 10)15.
Reducing the average space per person would lead to savings on rent16 and running costs. 
Z zmanjšanjem povprečne površine na osebo bi se prihranilo pri najemninah16 in tekočih stroških.
Some residences exceed the ceiling in the building policy 22 The EEAS building policy states that the maximum total surface area of all rooms of the residence of the head of delegation should be 600 m2. 
Nekatere rezidence so presegale zgornjo mejo, ki jo določa stavbna politika 22 Stavbna politika ESZD navaja, da bi morala skupna površina vseh prostorov v rezidenci vodje delegacije znašati največ 600 m2.
Although the average surface area of EU delegation residences in 2014 was under this ceiling (see paragraph 14), 34 residences (24 %) exceeded the ceiling (see Figure 7)17. 
Čeprav je bila povprečna površina rezidenc delegacij EU leta 2014 pod to zgornjo mejo (glej odstavek 14), jo je 34 rezidenc (24 %) presegalo (glej sliko 7)17.
13 Newly purchased buildings should be large enough to accommodate a 10 % increase in staff. 
13 Na novo pridobljene stavbe morajo biti dovolj velike za 10-odstotno povečanje števila zaposlenih.
14 The delegations with the highest office space per person were the delegation to the United Nations in New York (90 m2 per person) and the delegation to the United Nations in Geneva (104 m2 per person). 
14 Delegacije z največjo površino na osebo v pisarnah so bile delegacija pri Združenih narodih v New Yorku (90 m2 na osebo) in delegacija pri Združenih narodih v Ženevi (104 m2 na osebo).
15 This analysis deducts office space rented to other organisations. 
15 V tej analizi se pisarniški prostori, oddani v najem drugim organizacijam, niso upoštevali.
It excludes delegations with fewer than 10 staff, all of which have more than 35 m2 per person. 
Izključene so delegacije z manj kot 10 zaposlenimi, ki imajo vse več kot 35 m2 površine na osebo.
The analysis is based on permanent posts. 
Analiza temelji na stalnih delovnih mestih.
The inclusion of around 200 temporary trainees and national experts would reduce the average space per person to 40 m2. 
Če bi bilo vključenih približno 200 začasnih praktikantov in nacionalnih strokovnjakov, bi se povprečna površina na osebo zmanjšala na 40 m2.
16 The total annual rent of delegation offices in 2014 was 53 million euro (see Figure 1), which means that each m2 of the average space per person cost 1.3 million euro. 
16 Skupna letna najemnina pisarn delegacij v letu 2014 je znašala 53 milijonov EUR (glej sliko 1), kar pomeni, da je vsak m2 povprečne površine na osebo stal 1,3 milijona EUR.
17 The residence in Indonesia, at 1200m2,wasoneofthe largest residences. 
17 Rezidenca v Indoneziji je bila s 1 200 m2 ena največjih.
A contract has been signed to rent a new residence of 580 m2 from September 2015. 
Podpisana je bila pogodba za najem nove rezidence s 580 m2 od septembra 2015.
Observations 22 Office space per person in delegations m2 per person 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Maximum recommended (35 m2) Average (41 m2) Delegation office buildings Note: Excludes delegations with fewer than 10 staff members. 
Opažanja 22 Površina na osebo v pisarnah delegacij m2 na osebo 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 priporočeno največ (35 m2) povprečno (41 m2) Pisarniške stavbe delegacij Opozorilo: delegacije z manj kot 10 zaposlenimi niso upoštevane.
Source: European Court of Auditors based on EEAS data. 
Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi podatkov ESZD.
Observations 23 The EEAS owns buildings which it no longer uses 23 EU delegation office buildings purchased before 2000 and still used by the EEAS are among the office buildings in the worst condition (see Figure 4). 
Opažanja 23 ESZD je lastnica stavb, ki jih ne uporablja več 23 Pisarniške stavbe delegacij EU, ki so bile kupljene pred letom 2000 in jih ESZD še vedno uporablja, spadajo med pisarniške stavbe, ki so v najslabšem stanju (glej sliko 4).
Delegation staff in Gabon have relocated to small temporary offices, as the office building purchased in 1996 now has serious structural problems. 
Zaposleni v delegaciji v Gabonu so se preselili v majhne začasne pisarne, ker so na pisarniški stavbi, kupljeni leta 1996, zdaj resne konstrukcijske težave.
24 Owned residences are smaller and easier to maintain. 
24 Lastniške rezidence so manjše in lažje jih je vzdrževati.
The average condition of owned residences purchased before 2000 and still used by the EEAS is 4.6 out of 5 (see Figure 8). 
Povprečno stanje lastniških rezidenc, ki so bile kupljene pred letom 2000 in jih ESZD še vedno uporablja, je ocenjeno s 4,6 od 5 (glej sliko 8).
This is considerably better than the average condition of 3.4 of owned delegation offices purchased before 2000. 
To je precej bolje od povprečnega stanja lastniških pisarn delegacij, kupljenih pred letom 2000, ki je ocenjeno s 3,4.
25 Although the EEAS no longer uses 20 % of the delegation buildings it owns (7 out of 33 office buildings and 6 out of 30 residences), it has retained them. 
25 ESZD 20 % stavb delegacij, ki so v njeni lasti (7 od 33 pisarniških stavb in 6 od 30 rezidenc), sicer ne uporablja več, vendar jih je obdržala.
The unused office buildings in Chad, the Central African Republic and Rwanda are rented to other organisations, such as DG Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection or a Member State’s embassy. 
Neuporabljene pisarniške stavbe v Čadu, Srednjeafriški republiki in Ruandi so oddane v najem drugim organizacijam, na primer GD za humanitarno pomoč in civilno zaščito ali velepo-slaništvu države članice.