natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Observations 37 78 The Court analysed whether CAP measures set clear objectives from the outset insofar as they are related to farmers’ incomes. 
Opažanja 37 78 Sodišče je analiziralo, ali so bili v okviru ukrepov SKP že na začetku določeni jasni cilji v zvezi z dohodki kmetov.
On this basis the Court assessed whether the Commission defined relevant indicators allowing for an effective performance assessment of CAP measures in supporting farmers’ incomes. 
Na podlagi tega je Sodišče ocenilo, ali je Komisija določila ustrezne kazalnike, ki omogočajo uspešno oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri ukrepih SKP v podporo dohodkom kmetov.
In addition, it assessed whether the performance indicators for the current programming period will enable the extent of the achievement of those objectives to be measured. 
Poleg tega je ocenilo, ali bodo kazalniki smotrnosti poslovanja za tekoče programsko obdobje omogočali merjenje obsega doseganja teh ciljev.
The Court’s analysis was also corroborated by the experts. 
Analizo, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče, so potrdili tudi strokovnjaki.
Direct payments serve a multitude of objectives whose achievement is difficult to measure ... 
Neposredna plačila služijo številnim ciljem, katerih doseganje je težko izmeriti ...
79 In order to analyse the objectives of the CAP in relation to farmers’ incomes, the Court used the SMART criteria — that objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed — set out in the financial regulation69. 
79 Pri analizi ciljev SKP v zvezi z dohodki kmetov je Sodišče uporabilo merila SMART iz finančne uredbe69, na podlagi katerih morajo biti cilji specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, ustrezni in časovno opredeljeni.
80 In general, commercial agricultural holdings gain their income mainly from the sale of their produce. 
80 Komercialna kmetijska gospodarstva svoje dohodke na splošno dobijo od prodaje svojih proizvodov.
Direct payments to farmers are per se additional revenue. 
Neposredna plačila kmetom so sama po sebi dodatni prihodek.
Moreover, they can be expected to have a further impact on farmers’ income by influencing their business decisions70. 
Poleg tega se lahko pričakuje, da bodo imela nadaljnji učinek na dohodke kmetov, saj vplivajo na njihove poslovne odločitve70.
81 The general CAP objective of viable food production and its impact on agricultural income has so far not been translated into measurable targets. 
81 Splošni cilj SKP – trajnostna proizvodnja hrane in njen vpliv na kmetijske dohodke – doslej še ni bil prenesen v merljive podcilje.
How individual measures within the direct payments schemes should precisely contribute towards achieving this overall objective is also not specified, because neither the regulation71 nor its preamble define their specific objectives in a sufficiently clear manner and there is no baseline or target against which their performance could be measured. 
Kako točno naj bi posamezni ukrepi znotraj shem neposrednih plačil prispevali k doseganju tega splošnega cilja, tudi ni natančno določeno, ker niti uredba71 niti njene uvodne izjave posebnih ciljev ne določajo dovolj jasno in ker ni izhodišča ali podcilja, na podlagi katerega bi bilo mogoče meriti njihovo smotrnost poslovanja.
Moreover, the relationships with the other CAP objectives such as the sustainable management of natural resources are complex and can affect farmers’ incomes as well. 
Poleg tega so povezave z drugimi cilji SKP, kot je trajnostno upravljanje naravnih virov, zapletene in lahko prav tako vplivajo na dohodke kmetov.
69 Article 30(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 
69 Člen 30(3) Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št.
70 According to the Commission, in 2012 the proportion of direct payments to total receipts of commercial holdings in the EU was 11.2 %. 
70 Na podlagi navedb Komisije je v letu 2012 delež neposrednih plačil v skupnih prejemkih komercialnih gospodarstev v EU znašal 11,2 %.
The share varies significantly across holdings and Member States, however (EU farm economics overview based on 2012 FADN data, p. 
Vendar pa se ta delež med državami članicami in gospodarstvi zelo razlikuje (Pregled ključnih gospodarskih gibanj, ki temeljijo na podatkih FADN 2012, str.
71 Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013. 
71 Uredba (EU) št. 1307/2013.
The available budget largely represents the amount of EU support historically paid to farmers for cultivation of land or rearing of animals (coupled payments). 
Razpoložljivi proračun v veliki meri pomeni znesek pomoči EU, v preteklosti izplačane kmetom za obdelavo zemljišč ali rejo živali (vezana plačila).
Observations 38 82 The Commission considers that direct payments, also in conjunction with other measures, should simultaneously contribute towards achieving a multitude of objectives, such as supporting the economic viability of holdings, improving productivity and competitiveness in agriculture and promoting the sustainable management of natural resources and climate action. 
Opažanja 38 82 Komisija meni, da bi morala neposredna plačila, tudi v povezavi z drugimi ukrepi, hkrati prispevati k doseganju številnih ciljev, kot so podpiranje ekonomske sposobnosti preživetja gospodarstev, izboljšanje produktivnosti in konkurenčnosti v kmetijstvu ter spodbujanje trajnostnega upravljanja naravnih virov in podnebnih ukrepov.
However, due to the overall lack of clarity regarding what the general and specific objectives of the CAP are expected to achieve, it is inherently difficult to assess, on the basis of the performance indicators, whether a measure has achieved its objective. 
Vendar je zaradi splošnega pomanjkanja jasnosti glede tega, kaj naj bi splošni in specifični cilji SKP dosegli, na podlagi kazalnikov smotrnosti poslovanja težko oceniti, ali je ukrep dosegel svoj cilj.
The variety of options that Member States can choose for the implementation of direct payments adds complexity, because effects on agricultural markets and income disparities of farmers can be considerably different from one Member State to another. ... and CAP performance indicators related to farmers’ incomes cannot be clearly linked to measures and actual achievement of the objectives 83 Indicators should allow for the assessment of the progress, effectiveness and efficiency of the policy measures against the objectives72. 
Številne možnosti, ki jih države članice lahko izberejo za izvajanje neposrednih plačil, zapletenost še povečujejo, saj se lahko vplivi na kmetijske trge in razlike v dohodkih kmetov znatno razlikujejo med državami članicami. ... kazalnikov smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju SKP, ki se nanašajo na dohodke kmetov, pa ni mogoče jasno povezati z ukrepi in dejanskim doseganjem ciljev 83 Kazalniki naj bi omogočali oceno napredka, uspešnosti in učinkovitosti ukrepov politike glede na cilje72.
They should be relevant, accepted, credible, measurable and robust and based on sound statistical information73. 
Biti morajo ustrezni, sprejeti, verodostojni, merljivi in trdni ter morajo temeljiti na zanesljivih statističnih podatkih73.
84 The impact indicators are designed to show the combined effects of the CAP measures. 
84 Kazalniki učinka so zasnovani tako, da prikazujejo kombinirane učinke ukrepov SKP.
In respect of farmers’ incomes, as a part of the general objective of viable food production, the agricultural entrepreneurial income and the agricultural factor income are the most relevant impact indicators. 
Glede dohodkov kmetov, ki so del splošnega cilja trajnostne proizvodnje hrane, sta najbolj relevantna kazalnika učinka podjetniški dohodek kmetijstva in faktorski dohodek kmetijstva.
However, they are limited to showing trends and not absolute income values, and no baselines have been established. 
Vendar pa sta omejena na prikaz trendov in ne absolutnih vrednosti dohodka, pa tudi izhodišča v zvezi z njimi niso bila določena.
Moreover, changes in these indicators are mainly due to changes in prices and not to the effect of CAP measures. 
Poleg tega so spremembe teh kazalnikov predvsem posledica sprememb cen in ne učinka ukrepov SKP.
They also cannot provide information as to what extent the CAP achieved the treaty objective of a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, as no adequate data are available at EU level. 
Prav tako ne morejo prikazati, v kolikšni meri je SKP dosegla cilj iz Pogodbe – primerno življenjsko raven kmetijske skupnosti, ker niso na voljo ustrezni podatki na ravni EU.
72 Article 1 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 834/2014 of 22 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of the common monitoring and evaluation framework of the common agricultural policy (OJ L 230, 1.8.2014, p. 
834/2014 z dne 22. julija 2014 o določitvi predpisov za uporabo skupnega okvira spremljanja in vrednotenja skupne kmetijske politike (UL L 230, 1.8.2014, str.
73 As far as is possible, indicators should meet the RACER criteria: relevant, accepted, credible, easy and robust: ‘Part III: Annexes to impact assessment guidelines’ (European Commission, 15 January 2009 — http://ec.europa.eu/ smart-regulation/impact/ commission_guidelines/docs/ iag_2009_annex_en.pdf). 
73 Kazalniki bi morali, kolikor je le mogoče, izpolnjevati merila RACER: ustreznost, sprejetost, verodostojnost, preprostost in trdnost: Part III: Annexes to impact assessment guidelines (Evropska komisija, 15. januar 2009 – http:// ec.europa.eu/ smartregulation/impact/ commission_guidelines/docs/ iag_2009_annex_en.pdf).
Observations 39 85 The Court also found that the Commission’s result indicators, insofar as they are directly related to income, are relevant for the general objective of viable food production and thus the income of farmers from agriculture. 
Opažanja 39 85 Sodišče je prav tako ugotovilo, da so kazalniki rezultatov, ki jih uporablja Komisija, če so neposredno povezani z dohodki, pomembni za splošni cilj trajnostne proizvodnje hrane in s tem za dohodke kmetov iz kmetijstva.
Information provided by the indicators, however, are once again not sufficiently precise to be linked clearly enough to EU measures to show that they contributed towards the desired effects (see Box 4). 
Informacije, ki so jih dali kazalniki, pa niso dovolj natančne, da bi jih bilo mogoče dovolj jasno povezati z ukrepi EU in s tem dokazati, da so prispevali k zaželenim učinkom (glej okvir 4).
As no targets or baselines have been set, the indicators cannot provide information about a possible gap between the desired and the actual achievement of objectives and whether the measures have contributed to reducing this gap. 
Ker podcilji ali izhodišča niso bili določeni, kazalniki ne morejo zagotoviti informacij o možni vrzeli med želenimi in dejansko doseženimi cilji ter o tem, ali so ukrepi prispevali k zmanjšanju te vrzeli.
Weaknesses in the Commission’s result indicators related to farmers’ incomes The indicator share of annual direct payments in agricultural income, which is calculated on the basis of the EAAs, highlights the importance of direct payments for the agricultural sector. 
Slabosti v kazalnikih rezultatov v zvezi z dohodki kmetov, ki jih uporablja Komisija Kazalnik delež letnih neposrednih plačil v kmetijskem dohodku, ki se izračuna na podlagi ERK, poudarja pomen neposrednih plačil za kmetijski sektor.
However, the underlying data for this indicator are not sufficiently reliable74. 
Vendar pa s tem povezani podatki za ta kazalnik niso dovolj zanesljivi74.
Furthermore, it is also not clear if a change in the indicator is solely or mainly due to specific CAP measures, changes in markets or other factors. 
Poleg tega tudi ni jasno, ali je sprememba kazalnika izključno ali večinoma posledica specifičnih ukrepov SKP, sprememb na trgih ali drugih dejavnikov.
The indicator variability of farm income depends mainly on the volatility of world market prices. 
Kazalnik spremenljivost dohodka kmetij je odvisen predvsem od nestanovitnosti cen na svetovnem trgu.
This indicator, which is calculated on the basis of FADN data, can provide relevant information about the overall effectiveness of direct payments in cushioning the effects of market instabilities. 
Ta kazalnik, ki se izračuna na podlagi podatkov FADN, lahko zagotovi ustrezne informacije o splošni uspešnosti neposrednih plačil pri blaženju učinkov tržnih nestabilnosti.
However, the indicator is not sufficiently sound as it does not take into account subsidies, taxes and non-agricultural income, which can play an important role in helping farmers cope with price volatility. 
Vendar pa kazalnik ni dovolj trden, saj ne upošteva subvencij, davkov in nekmetijskega dohodka, ki ima lahko pomembno vlogo pri pomoči kmetom pri spopadanju z nestanovitnostjo cen.
The indicator value added for primary producers in the food chain looks at the added value of primary agricultural production in comparison to other stages of the food chain, such as the food processing industry, traders or supermarkets. 
Kazalnik dodana vrednost za primarne proizvajalce v prehrambni verigi preučuje dodano vrednost primarne kmetijske proizvodnje glede na druge faze prehrambne verige, kot so živilskopredelovalna industrija, trgovci ali veleblagovnice.
The indicator is not sufficiently robust, as situations can occur where the indicator decreases while agricultural income increases. 
Kazalnik ni dovolj trden, saj lahko pride do situacij, v katerih se kazalnik zmanjša, kmetijski dohodek pa poveča.
This is for example the case where there is a high demand for new food products resulting in higher product prices. 
To se na primer zgodi, kadar obstaja veliko povpraševanje po novih živil, ki prinese višje cene proizvodov.
In this case the share of farmers in the food chain is likely to be reduced, although the income of farmers may be higher. 
V tem primeru se bo delež kmetov v prehrambni verigi verjetno zmanjšal, čeprav so dohodki kmetov lahko večji.
74 See paragraph 38. 
74 Glej odstavek 38.
75 In the Netherlands, 39 % of the agricultural output was produced by holdings which did not receive direct payments. 
75 Na Nizozemskem so 39 % kmetijske proizvodnje proizvedla gospodarstva, ki niso prejela neposrednih plačil.
Observations 40 86 The Commission’s indicators do not consider other results that are important for the performance of direct payments in relation to income. 
Opažanja 40 86 Pri kazalnikih, ki jih uporablja Komisija, se ne upoštevajo drugi rezultati, pomembni za smotrnost poslovanja pri neposrednih plačilih v zvezi z dohodki.
For example, there is no result indicator to provide information as to the extent to which the farming population uses the instrument of direct payments,to what extent the payments actually go to agricultural producers and whether the new direct payment schemes support low income farmers better than before the reform. 
Ni na primer kazalnika rezultata, ki bi zagotovil informacije o obsegu, v katerem kmetijsko prebivalstvo uporablja instrument neposrednih plačil, o tem, kako daleč plačila proizvajalcem kmetijskih proizvodov dejansko sežejo in ali nove sheme neposrednih plačil bolje podpirajo kmete z nizkimi dohodki kot pred reformo.
87 Also, the indicators are not informative about whether the EU payments contributed towards achieving the income objective efficiently, because the indicators cannot show whether other levels or forms of CAP support would affect agricultural income by the same amount and at the same budgetary costs, or that a specific measure was sufficiently targeted to deal with market failure in the most efficient way. 
87 Poleg tega kazalniki ne dajejo informacij o tem, ali so plačila EU učinkovito prispevala k dosegi cilja glede dohodkov, ker kazalniki ne morejo kazati, ali bi druge stopnje ali oblike podpore SKP vplivale na kmetijske dohodke v enakem znesku in z enakimi proračunskimi stroški ali da je bil dani ukrep dovolj ciljno usmerjen, da bi kar se da učinkovito obravnaval nedelovanje trga.
Conclusions and 41 recommendations 88 Food production, income and standard of living of farmers are a particular focus of the treaty. 
Zaključki in priporočila 41 88 Proizvodnja hrane, dohodki in življenjska raven kmetov so v Pogodbi posebej poudarjeni.
With the 2013 reform of the CAP one third of the EU budget is still directly or indirectly dedicated to stabilising markets and supporting the income of farmers, and thus contributing to viable food production and a fair standard of living for farmers. 
Z reformo SKP leta 2013 se tretjina proračuna EU še vedno neposredno ali posredno namenja stabilizaciji trgov in podpori dohodkom kmetov, kar prispeva k trajnostni proizvodnji hrane in primerni življenjski ravni kmetov.
89 In the past, the Court observed that more reliable and comprehensive statistics and indicators were required in order to follow more closely the performance of the CAP, of which more than two thirds of the budgetary resources were devoted to income support. 
89 V preteklosti je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so za natančnejše spremljanje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju SKP, pri kateri sta bili več kot dve tretjini proračunskih sredstev namenjeni dohodkovni podpori, potrebni bolj zanesljivi in celoviti statistični podatki in kazalniki.
90 The new framework for the monitoring and evaluation of the CAP requires the Commission to assess the combined impact of the CAP measures in relation to the stated objectives. 
90 Novi okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja SKP zahteva, da Komisija oceni skupni učinek ukrepov SKP glede na zastavljene cilje.
This involves sufficient and good-quality information. 
To vključuje zadostne in kakovostne informacije.
91 The Court concludes that the Commission’s system for measuring the performance of the CAP in relation to farmers’ incomes is not sufficiently well designed and the quality and quantity of statistical data used to analyse farmers’ incomes have significant limitations. 
91 Sodišče je prišlo do zaključka, da sistem Komisije za merjenje smotrnosti SKP v zvezi z dohodki kmetov ni dovolj dobro zasnovan, kakovost in količina statističnih podatkov, ki se uporabljajo za analizo dohodkov kmetov, pa ima pomembne omejitve.
The Commission has not clearly established the statistical data needed to effectively assess the performance of CAP measures in support of farmers’ incomes 92 No representative data are available on the disposable income of farm households, which would facilitate the assessment of the achievement of the treaty objective of ensuring a fair standard of living for farmers. 
Komisija ni jasno določila statističnih podatkov, potrebnih za uspešno oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v podporo dohodkom kmetov 92 Na voljo ni nobenih reprezentativnih podatkov o razpoložljivem dohodku gospodinjstev kmetij, ki bi omogočili oceno doseganja cilja zagotavljanja primerne življenjske ravni kmetov, določenega v Pogodbi.
Also, there is no reliable system to allow comparisons to be made between agricultural incomes and those in other sectors of the economy, which could justify EU income support for farmers (paragraphs 26 to 32). 
Prav tako ni zanesljivega sistema, ki bi omogočal primerjavo med kmetijskimi dohodki in tistimi v drugih gospodarskih sektorjih, kar bi upravičilo dohodkovno podporo EU za kmete (odstavki 26 do 32).
Conclusions and recommendations 42 Recommendation 1 — Developing frameworks for collecting The Commission should develop a more comprehensive statistical framework to provide information on the disposable income of farm households and to better capture the standard of living of farmers. 
Zaključki in priporočila 42 Priporočilo 1 – Razvoj okvirov za zbiranje in primerjanje ustreznih informacij o dohodkih kmetov Komisija naj razvije celovitejši statistični okvir za zagotavljanje informacij o razpoložljivem dohodku gospodinjstev kmetij in boljšo določitev življenjske ravni kmetov.
For this purpose the Commission should, in cooperation with the Member States and based on a common methodology, consider how best to develop and combine existing EU statistical instruments. 
V ta namen naj Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami in na podlagi skupne metodologije preuči, kako bi se lahko najbolje oblikovali in združevali obstoječi statistični instrumenti EU.
The Commission should also improve the framework for the comparison of farmers’ incomes with incomes in other sectors of the economy. 
Komisija naj izboljša tudi okvir za primerjavo dohodkov kmetov z dohodki v drugih gospodarskih sektorjih.
93 The tools currently available at EU level for measuring farmers’ incomes are the EAAs and the FADN. 
93 Orodji, ki sta na ravni EU trenutno na voljo za merjenje dohodkov kmetov, sta računi ERK in mreža FADN.
Both provide essential data for measuring the performance of the CAP measures directed at promoting viable food production and supporting farmers’ incomes. 
Obe zagotavljata bistvene podatke za merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP, usmerjenih v spodbujanje trajnostne proizvodnje hrane in podpiranje dohodkov kmetov.
These instruments, however, have significant limitations and important data may not be available for an effective assessment of the CAP measures aiming at the support of farmers’ incomes. 
Ta instrumenta pa imata pomembne omejitve in mogoče je, da pomembni podatki niso na voljo za uspešno oceno ukrepov SKP, namenjenih podpori prihodkom kmetov.
94 The potential of the EAAs has not yet been fully used and they are not sufficiently informative about important factors that are relevant for farmers’ incomes. 
94 Potencial ERK še ni v celoti izkoriščen, ERK pa ne zagotavljajo dovolj informacij o pomembnih dejavnikih, ki so relevantni za dohodke kmetov.
Furthermore, EAA information is not always used correctly by the Commission (paragraphs 33 to 39). 
Poleg tega Komisija informacij ERK vedno ne uporablja pravilno (odstavki 33 do 39).
Recommendation 2 — Developing the EAAs The Commission should further develop the EAAs so that their potential could be better used in order to: ο provide more detailed information on the factors impacting agricultural income; ο ensure transmission of regional-level data based on formal arrangements with the Member States. 
Priporočilo 2 – Razvoj ERK Komisija naj še naprej razvija ERK, da se lahko bolje izkoristi njihov potencial in tako: ο zagotovijo podrobnejše informacije o dejavnikih, ki vplivajo na kmetijske dohodke; ο zagotovi prenos podatkov na regionalni ravni na podlagi formalnih ureditev z državami članicami.
The Commission should also: ο examine whether the EAAs can be further developed to provide a reasonable estimate of the economic value of the public goods that are produced by farmers; ο ensure that EAA information is used appropriately in income indicators. and comparing relevant information on farmers’ incomes 
Komisija naj tudi: ο preuči, ali je mogoče ERK nadalje razviti, da se zagotovi razumna ocena gospodarske vrednosti javnih dobrin, ki jih proizvajajo kmetje; ο zagotovi, da se bodo informacije ERK ustrezno uporabljale v kazalnikih dohodka.
Conclusions and recommendations 43 95 The FADN is an important instrument for the evaluation of the CAP, but it has limitations. 
Zaključki in priporočila 43 95 Mreža FADN je pomemben instrument za vrednotenje SKP, vendar ima omejitve.
The income indicators do not fully take account of the evolution of holdings in the agricultural sector, while information about other farm-related incomes of farmers is incomplete. 
Kazalniki dohodka ne upoštevajo v celoti razvoja gospodarstev v kmetijskem sektorju, informacije o drugih s kmetijo povezanih dohodkih kmetov pa so nepopolne.
Furthermore, no income data are available at EU level for a large number of beneficiaries of EU-support (paragraphs 40 to 51). 
Poleg tega za številne upravičence do podpore EU na ravni EU ni na voljo podatkov o dohodkih (odstavki 40 do 51).