natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
At the beginning of 2002 the Food and Veterinary Office began a series of audit (1) Health and Consumer Protection DG has legislative responsibilities in the food, veterinary, phytosanitary and public health fields. 
Na začetku leta 2002 je UPV začel niz obiskov v državah članicah, da bi (1) Generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov je zakonsko odgovoren za področja prehrane, veterine, zdravstvenega varstva rastlin ter javnega zdravja.
Health and Consumer Protection DG is the result of the reorganisation of several units from three Directorates-General (DG III - Internal Market, DG VI - Agriculture and DG XXIV - Consumer Protection). 
Generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov je bil ustanovljen po reorganizaciji več enot treh splošnih direktoratov (Generalnega direktorata III za notranji trg, Generalnega direktorata VI za kmetijstvo in Generalnega direktorata XXIV za varstvo potrošnikov).
(2) Article 21 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999. 
(2) Člen 21 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1254/1999.
(3) Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001. visits to the Member States to evaluate the conduct of the checks on the traceability of beef and beef products. 
(3) Člen 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 2419/2001. ocenil izvajanje preverjanja izsledljivosti govejega mesa in proizvodov iz govejega mesa.
In the course of these visits the entire chain is analysed, from fattening to point of sale. 
Pri teh misijah se analizira celotna veriga od vzreje do prodajnih mest.
The reports containing the observations and recommendations are subject to contradictory procedures between the Office and the Member States, and the final report is published on the CommissionŐs Internet site. 
Poročila s pripombami in priporočili so podvržena medsebojno izključujočim se postopkom med Uradom in državami članicami, končno poročilo pa je objavljeno na spletni strani Komisije.
The Food and Veterinary Office visits the 15 Member States over a period of 12 months in connection with this work. 
Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo pri svojem delu v 12 mesecih obišče 15 držav članic.
DG Agriculture is involved at Member State level as part of the clearance of accounts procedure. 
Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo posreduje na ravni držav članic v okviru postopka potrjevanja obračunov.
In this context, it evaluates the reliability of the information in the cattle database, together with the procedures for exchanging information between national audit units following the on-the-spot checks carried out in the identification and registration context. 
Pri tem oceni zanesljivost informacij v podatkovnih bazah o govedu ter postopke za izmenjavo informacij med nacionalnimi revizijskimi službami po kontrolah na kraju samem, izvedenih v okviru sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda.
The findings of DG Agriculture during its Ôclearance of accountsŐ visits may reveal problems affecting cross-checks of data taken from premium applications and data from the identification and registration database, delays in reporting movements, unsatisfactory keeping of herd books and shortcomings in the system for validating passports. 
Ugotovitve Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo med postopki „potrjevanja obračunov“ lahko razkrijejo težave pri izvedbi navzkrižnih preverjanj podatkov na zahtevkih za premije ter podatkov v podatkovnih bazah sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda, zamude pri prijavljanju premikov ali nezadovoljivo vodenje registrov živali na gospodarstvu oziroma pomanjkljivosti v sistemu potrjevanja potnih listov.
Negligence in the organisation of identification checks may also be detected, such as an absence of checks on keepers other than those applying for premiums or failure to communicate the results of checks between the departments responsible for managing premiums and those in charge of identification. 
Opaziti je mogoče tudi malomarnost pri organizaciji kontrol identifikacije, kot sta neizvajanje nadzorov nad drugimi imetniki, ki ne zaprošajo za premije, ali nesporočanje rezultatov kontrol med službami, odgovornimi za upravljanje premij, in službami, odgovornimi za identifikacijo.
Coordination of the work of the various Commission departments involved in the Member States has improved with time. 
Sčasoma se je koordinacija dela različnih služb Komisije v državah članicah izboljšala.
However, as there are no quantified quality indicators that are used by all those involved, they have no means of assessing whether the national databases are acceptable or not. 
Ker pa ne obstajajo nobeni kvantificirani kazalci kakovosti, ki bi jih uporabljali vsi udeleženci, ti ne morejo oceniti, ali so nacionalne podatkovne baze sprejemljive ali ne.
With the exception of the weaknesses discussed in paragraphs 44 and 92, the statistics drawn up by Member States on on-the-spot checks on identification and registration are not analysed or used as a tool for guidance by the Commission (see table 6). 
Razen pomanjkljivosti, navedenih v odstavkih 44 in 92, se statistike, ki jih o kontrolah na kraju samem v okviru sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda izdelajo države članice, ne analizirajo ali uporabljajo kot usmerjevalno sredstvo Komisije (glej tabelo 6).
The data concerning Ôpenalties imposedŐ do not allow comparison of Member States, as the information forwarded has not been standardised; some Member States provide the number of penalties imposed (BE, IT), others the number of holdings and animals to which penalties are applied (FR, LU, PT, FI, UK-GB), or merely the number of holdings penalised (DK), or the number of cattle subject to penalties (SE); one Member State gives the number of cases subject to legal proceedings (ES). 
Opomba 2: Podatki, ki se nanašajo na „naložene kazni“, ne omogočajo primerjalne obravnave med državami članicami, ker poslane informacije niso enotne; nekatere države članice navajajo število naloženih kazni (BE, IT), druge število gospodarstev in živali, ki so predmet kazni (FR, LU, PT, FI, UK-GB), ali samo število gospodarstev, ki so predmet kazni (DK), ali število goveda, ki je predmet kazni (SE), ena država članica navaja število primerov, ki so sodno preganjani (ES).
Greece has not yet implemented the Integrated Administration and Control System. 
Opomba 3: Grčija še ni vzpostavila integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema.
No statistics are available. the Annual Reports required by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2630/97. 
Na voljo ni torej nobenih statističnih podatkov. Vir: Letna poročila, kot jih predvideva Uredba Komisije (ES) št.
C 29/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 71. 
C 29/24 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.2.2005 71.
The legislation on that system, like other veterinary provisions, does not lay down any financial penalties in the case of non-compliance with the rules in force. 
Zakonodaja o tem sistemu ter druge veterinarske določbe ne določajo nobenih finančnih kazni za neupoštevanje veljavnih pravil.
In contrast, the legislation setting up IACS does lay down financial penalties for non-compliance with the rules. 
Nasprotno pa uredba, ki ureja integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem, predlaga finančne kazni za neupoštevanje pravil.
The work of DG Agriculture may thus result in financial corrections (1) in cases where serious anomalies relating specifically to identification are found during audits. 
Tako lahko delo Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo privede do finančnih popravkov (1) pri hujših nepravilnostih v zvezi z identifikacijo, ugotovljenih med preverjanji.
The penalty arrangements differ and no links have been provided between the two systems. 
Ureditvi glede izrekanja kazni se razlikujeta in med njima ni nobene povezave.
Inconsistencies in the management of premiums Bovine premiums subject to controls in the context of the Integrated Administration and Control System 72. 
Nedoslednosti pri upravljanju premij Premije za govedo, ki so predmet kontrol v okviru integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema 72.
The legislation on the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) stipulates that Member States are to carry out administrative checks to verify that the conditions of eligibility for the granting of aid and premiums are fulfilled. 
Uredba o integriranem administrativnem in kontrolnem sistemu (IAKS) določa, da morajo države članice opraviti administrativne kontrole, s katerimi bodo zagotovile, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za upravičenost do dodelitve pomoči in premij.
These administrative checks include, in particular, cross-checks with the cattle database. 
Te administrativne kontrole zlasti zajemajo navzkrižna preverjanja s podatkovno bazo o govedu.
IACS thus uses the computerised cattle database (the core element of the identification and registration system) to validate applications for premiums (2). 
IAKS tako računalniške podatkovne baze o govedu (osrednji element sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda) uporablja za potrjevanje zahtevkov za premije (2).
The Commission ensures that all the Member States put administrative checks in place. 
Komisija skrbi, da administrativne kontrole izvajajo vse države članice.
These must include checking all the eligibility conditions against the identification and registration database. 
Slednje morajo zajemati preverjanje vseh pogojev za upravičenost do pomoči s podatkovno bazo sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda.
The standard of checks on eligibility conditions varied greatly in the four Member States visited. 
Raven preverjanja pogojev za upravičenost je v štirih obiskanih državah članicah zelo različna.
The Commission has provided a precise definition of the administrative checks to be carried out in the context of bovine premiums by breaking the checks down into key checks and auxiliary checks. 
Komisija je natančno opredelila administrativne kontrole in jih razčlenila na ključne ter dopolnilne kontrole, ki jih je treba izvesti v okviru premij za govedorejo.
It has not specified which anomalies found in respect of identification are to be taken into account and has not said whether these anomalies should lead to payments being frozen or not. 
Določila ni nobenih nepravilnosti, ugotovljenih pri identifikaciji, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati, niti ni navedla, ali povzročajo zamrznitev izplačil ali ne. V okvirčku št.
(1) The clearance of accounts procedure provides for financial corrections equivalent to the amount of the risk incurred for Community funds. 
(1) Postopek potrjevanja obračunov določa finančne popravke v višini zneska tveganja, ki je nastal v zvezi s sredstvi Skupnosti.
(2) Article 16(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001. 
(2) Člen 16(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 2419/2001.
Box 8 Examples of movement anomalies: an off-farm movement which is not followed by any entry record by another keeper (farmer, trader, slaughterhouse, etc.), a date of exit after the date of entry at the next farm, gaps between the date of exit recorded by one keeper and the date of entry recorded by the next keeper (possibility that an intermediate movement has not been recorded, with resultant loss of audit trail). 
8 Nepravilnosti pri premikih so: po izstopu živali z gospodarstva drug imetnik ni vpisal nobenega vstopa (kmet, trgovec, klavnica itd.), datum izstopa z gospodarstva je poznejši od datuma vstopa na naslednje gospodarstvo, razlike med izstopnim datumom, ki ga je zabeležil določen imetnik, in vstopnim datumom, ki ga je zabeležil naslednji imetnik (neregistriranja možnega vmesnega premika in izguba sledljivosti).
Exceptional support measures for the beef market following the BSE crisis 75. 
Izredni ukrepi podpore za trg govejega mesa po krizi BSE 75.
During the BSE crisis in 1996 the Commission introduced a regulation which was applicable exclusively in the United Kingdom (3) and provided for the slaughter and destruction of cattle over 30 months old. 
Med krizo BSE leta 1996 je Komisija uvedla uredbo, ki je določala zakol in uničenje goveda, starejšega od 30 mesecev, ter je veljala samo za Združeno kraljestvo (3).
During the second crisis, in 2000, the Commission adopted new measures, which applied to the other Member States. 
Komisija je med drugo krizo leta 2000 sprejela nove ukrepe, ki so veljali za druge države članice.
In this new regulation, the Commission stipulated that in order to be eligible for the payments granted for slaughter and destruction of cattle, animals must be identified and registered in conformity with the identification and registration regulation (4). 
V tej novi uredbi Komisija določa, da morajo biti živali, če želimo, da so upravičene do plačil, dodeljenih za zakol in uničenje goveda, identificirane in registrirane v skladu z uredbo o sistemu za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda (4).
The regulation applicable to the United Kingdom was not amended to incorporate this condition. 
Uredba, ki velja za Združeno kraljestvo, ni bila spremenjena, da bi se vanjo vključil ta pogoj.
This meant that the animals did not have to be identified and registered in accordance with the appropriate legislation in order to be eligible for payments granted in case of slaughter and destruction of cattle. 
Tako živali ni bilo treba identificirati in registrirati v skladu z uredbo o sistemu za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda, da bi bile upravičene do plačil, dodeljenih za zakol in uničenje goveda.
This difference in treatment between the Member States is an inconsistency in the legislation. 
To različno obravnavanje držav članic povzroča neskladnost zakonodaje.
The Community cattle registration and identification system was, in fact, set up in the EU in response to the BSE crisis. 
Sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda se je v EU pravzaprav uvedel po krizi BSE.
The United Kingdom, the Member State mainly affected by the disease, was the only one not legally obliged to carry out cross-checks with the national database, and benefited from payments for animals which were not identified and were slaughtered in order to be destroyed. 
Združeno kraljestvo, glavna država članica, ki jo je prizadela bolezen, ni bilo zakonsko obvezano izvajati navzkrižnega preverjanja z nacionalno podatkovno bazo ter je prejemalo plačila za živali, ki so bile neidentificirane in so se zaklale zaradi uničenja.
The CommissionŐs justification for the difference in treatment was the objective of the 1996 regulation, which aimed to withdraw older cattle from the market that were not subject to the identification obligations and whose age could be determined by examination of the teeth. 
Komisija je neenako obravnavanje utemeljila s ciljem Uredbe iz leta 1996, s katero naj bi odstranili s trga starejše krave, za katere niso veljale obveznosti identifikacije in katerih starost se je lahko določila s pregledom zob.
This argument, which is now no longer relevant, was justified inasmuch as imposing identification requirements for older animals might have increased the risk of illicit slaughter. 
Ta argument, ki sedaj ni več ustrezen, je bil upravičen samo toliko, kolikor bi uvedba zahtev glede identifikacije za starejše živali povečala nevarnost nezakonitih zakolov.
(3) Commission Regulation (EC) No 716/96 (OJ L 99, 20.4.1996, p. 
(3) Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 716/96 (UL L 99, 20.4.1996, str.
(4) Article 4(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2777/2000 (OJ L 321, 19.12.2000, p. 
(4) Člen 4(3) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2777/2000 (UL L 321, 19.12.2000, str.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union FINDINGS OF THE COURTŐS AUDITS IN THE MEMBER STATES VISITED 78. 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije UGOTOVITVE REVIZIJ SODIŠČA V OBISKANIH DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH 78.
The situation encountered in the four Member States visited during the first half of 2002, i.e. more than 24 months after the deadline of 31 December 1999 for setting up an efficient system of identification and registration, revealed shortcomings. 
Položaj v štirih obiskanih državah članicah v prvi polovici leta 2002, tj. več kot 24 mesecev po izteku roka 31. decembra 1999, določenega za vzpostavitev učinkovitega sistema identifikacije in registracije, je razkril pomanjkljivosti.
Some Member States were still in the process of developing their own systems at the time of the audit and improvements were planned in all Member States visited. 
Nekatere države članice so med revizijo še vedno razvijale svoj sistem in v vseh obiskanih državah članicah so bile predvidene izboljšave.
Although, in the meantime, a number of the CourtŐs findings have become irrelevant, other weaknesses identified at a certain point are the subject of recommendations (see paragraphs 92 to 99) and must still be corrected. 
Če v tem času nekatere ugotovitve Sodišča niso več ustrezne, pa so se za druge ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti v danem trenutku pripravila priporočila (glej odstavke 92-99), ki jih je treba še vedno po-pravljati.
Table 4 illustrates the situation observed in 2002 for the four Member States visited, in five areas, namely ear tags, farm registers, passports, computerised databases and the level of participation in the system on the part of the various keepers. 
Tabela 4 ponazarja položaj, ugotovljen leta 2002, za štiri obiskane države članice na petih področjih, in sicer glede ušesnih znamk, registrov gospodarstev, potnih listov, računalniških podatkovnih baz in stopnje vključenosti različnih imetnikov v sistem.
Ear tags 79. 
Ušesne znamke 79.
The legislation stipulates that the quantities of ear tags distributed to farmers are to cover requirements for a maximum period of one year. 
Zakonodaja določa, da morajo količine ušesnih znamk, razdeljene kmetom, zadostovati potrebam za največ eno leto.
In the Member States visited, the ear tags were not always restricted to these quantities. 
Število ušesnih znamk v obiskanih državah članicah ni bilo vedno omejeno na te količine.
Generally, the format of the ear tags corresponds to the legislative requirements (see photograph 1). 
Na splošno oblika ušesnih znamk ustreza zakonodajnim zahtevam (glej sliko 1).
In Germany, France and Italy, the national authorities did not use indicators such as rates of loss of ear tags or frequency of retagging to evaluate the quality of the ear tags. 
V Nemčiji, Franciji in Italiji nacionalne oblasti niso uporabile kazalcev, kot so stopnje izgub ušesnih znamk ali pogostost ponovne izdaje znamke, da bi ocenile kakovosti teh ušesnih znamk.
Likewise, they did not examine the procedures for awarding contracts. 
Podobno niso preučile postopkov za oddajo naročil.
In contrast, in Great Britain, where ear tags made by 12 different producers were approved, statistical data are available (ear tag allocation system) and show that 10,8 % of all ear tags had been replaced after four years. 
Na drugi strani pa so v Veliki Britaniji, kjer so bile odobrene ušesne znamke 12 različnih proizvajalcev, na razpolago statistični podatki („Ear Tag Allocation System“), ki kažejo, da je bilo 10,8 odstotka vseh ušesnih znamk zamenjanih po štirih letih.
This replacement rate varied greatly depending on suppliers and was sometimes even as much as 23 %. 
Ta stopnja zamenjave se je močno razlikovala po dobaviteljih in je lahko dosegla celo 23 odstotkov.
Farm registers 81. 
Registri kmetijskega gospodarstva 81.
In all the Member States visited, the register used by slaughterhouses, wholesalers and traders did not include all the information required by the legislation (see box 9). 
V vseh obiskanih državah članicah register, ki so jih uporabljale klavnice, grosisti in trgovci, ni vseboval vseh zakonsko predpisanih informacij (glej okvirček št. 9).
C 29/25 Box 9 In France, the competent authority did not approve a specific register for all categories of keeper, in accordance with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. 
C 29/25 Okvirček št. 9 V Franciji pristojni organ ni odobril posebnega registra za vse kategorije imetnikov v skladu s členom 7(3) Uredbe (ES) št.
The format of the register approved for fattening holdings made no provision for continuous recording of herd movements and did not make it possible to see, directly, the number of cattle present on the farm. 
Oblika registra, odobrenega za vzrejna gospodarstva, ni predvidevala nobene določbe za stalno beleženje premikov staleža ter ni omogočala, da se neposredno ugotovi število goveda, prisotnega na gospodarstvu.
In Italy, two different models of herd register were in existence. 
V Italiji sta obstajala dva različna vzorca registra gospodarstva.
In Great Britain, traders, managers of markets and slaughterhouses did not always keep registers in the format approved by the competent authority. 
V Veliki Britaniji trgovci, upravitelji trgov in klavnice registra niso vedno vodili v obliki, ki jo je odobril pristojni organ.
Passports 82. 
Potni listi 82.
Passport formats varied considerably from one Member State to another, as every Member State has developed its own system. 
Oblike potnih listov so se po državah zelo razlikovale, saj je vsaka država članica razvila svoj lastni sistem.
The passports were not comparable, one to another, and it was difficult for a farmer from another Member State to deci-pher the logic of the presentation in the various passports (see photograph 2). 
Potnih listov ni bilo mogoče primerjati med seboj in za rejca v eni državi članici je bilo težko razvozlati logiko predstavitve različnih potnih listov (glej sliko 2).
Monitoring of passports of animals traded between Member States was inadequate in the Member States visited (see box 10). 
Spremljanje potnih listov živali, namenjenih za trgovino med državami članicami, v obiskanih državah članicah ni bilo zadostno (glej okvirček št. 10).
Box 10 In Italy, there was no guarantee that the passports were reliable. 
10 V Italiji ni bila zagotovljena zanesljivost potnih listov.
In some regions different passport models were in existence simultaneously, with handwritten passports continuing to circulate alongside printed passports. 
V nekaterih regijah so namreč hkrati obstajali različni vzorci potnih listov, pri čemer so se poleg tiskanih še naprej uporabljali ročno napisani potni listi.
In some cases passports of calves, imported from third countries and identified on the farm of importation, contained no indication of their place of consignment. 
Nekateri potni listi telet, uvoženih iz tretjih držav in identificiranih na gospodarstvu uvoza, niso vsebovali navedbe o njihovem poreklu.
The Italian authorities elected not to issue new passports for animals from other Member States, but the information contained in the bar codes of the passports of traded animals was not systematically used, because the bar codes had not been standardised. 
Italijanske oblasti so se odločile, da ne bodo izdale novih potnih listov za živali iz drugih držav članic, vendar pa se podatki na črtnih kodah potnih listov živali, namenjenih za trgovino, niso uporabljali sistematično, ker te črtne kode niso bile standardizirane.
Passports of slaughtered animals were not systematically returned to the competent authority. 
Potni listi zaklanih živali se niso sistematično vračali pristojnemu organu.
Some slaughterhouses sent the passports to the headquarters of the national database, others sent them to local units and some kept them for several years. 
Nekatere klavnice so potne liste pošiljale na sedež nacionalne podatkovne baze, medtem ko so jih druge pošiljale na lokalne enote oziroma so jih nekatere hranile več let.
In Bavaria and Saxony there was no procedure for following up the return of passports after cattle had been slaughtered. 
Na Bavarskem in Saškem ni bilo nobenega postopka za spremljanje vračanja potnih listov po zakolu goveda.
Passports were not systematically returned to the Regionalstelle of the Land. 
Potni listi se niso sistematično vračali deželnemu „Regionalstelle“.
In addition, slaughterhouses did not complete the passports of all cattle slaughtered. 
Poleg tega klavnice niso izpolnjevale potnih listov za vsa zaklana goveda.
Where passports were reissued, there was no procedure for checking the justification for them. 
Pri ponovni izdaji potnih listov ni bilo nobenega postopka za zagotavljanje njihove upravičenosti.
In France, the authorities issue new passports for animals coming from other Member States. 
V Franciji organi za živali iz drugih držav članic izdajo nov potni list.