natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
VIII Concerning the results achieved and their sustain‐ ability, EUPOL has helped the Afghan national police to gain public trust by supporting the implementation of basic principles of civilian policing. 
VIII Glede doseženih rezultatov in njihove trajnosti je EUPOL pomagala afganistanski nacionalni policiji pridobiti zaupanje javnosti, tako da je podpirala izvajanje osnovnih načel civilnega policijskega dela.
Nevertheless, the police and justice sectors continue to suffer from systemic weaknesses. 
Kljub temu so v sektorjih policije in pravosodja še naprej sistemske slabosti.
The long‐term sustainability of EUPOL’s outcomes and of the Afghan policing sector in general is at risk, as it will largely depend on the will‐ ingness of the Afghan authorities to take ownership of the outcomes, the security situation and on EU and other international stakeholder funding. 
Dolgoročna trajnost izidov EUPOL in afganistanskega sektorja policijskega dela je ogrožena, saj bo močno odvisna od pripravljenosti afganistanskih organov, da prevzamejo lastno odgovornost v zvezi z izidi, varnostnimi razmerami ter financiranjem, ki ga zagotavljajo EU in drugi mednarodni deležniki.
IX Lastly, with respect to phasing‐out, EUPOL and the European External Action Service (EEAS) have drawn up a plan for winding down EUPOL’s activities by the end of 2016, but some concerns remain on how the EU can build upon EUPOL’s achievements and whether maximum value will be obtained from the disposal of the mission’s assets. 
IX Glede postopnega ukinjanja sta EUPOL in Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) pripravili načrt za dokončanje dejavnosti EUPOL do konca leta 2016, vendar je še nekaj pomislekov o tem, kako lahko EU gradi na dosežkih EUPOL in ali bo mogoče pri prodaji sredstev misije pridobiti najvišjo mogočo vrednost.
X Besides being applicable to the EUPOL mission in Afghanistan, the Court’s recommendations relate to the setting up, deployment and general aspects of improving preparatory measures and support func‐ tions for future CSDP missions. 
XPriporočila Sodišča veljajo za misijo EUPOL v Afganistanu, nanašajo pa se tudi na vzpostavljanje, razmestitev in splošne vidike izboljšanja pripravljalnih ukrepov in podpornih funkcij za prihodnje misije SVOP.
They also include prac‐ tical measures to improve the effectiveness of each type of activity, measures to improve the sustainability of CSDP mission outcomes, and the preparation of an overall strategy to mitigate the risks inherent in the downsizing and closure of missions and the disposal of mission assets. 
Vključujejo tudi praktične ukrepe za izboljšanje uspešnosti vsake vrste dejavnosti, ukrepe za izboljšanje trajnosti izidov misij SVOP in pripravo splošne strategije za zmanjševanje tveganj, povezanih z zmanjševanjem in zaključevanjem misij ter prodajo sredstev misij.
Introduction 09 01 Following the overthrow of the Taliban regime in 2001, Afghan representatives participated in the UN talks held in Bonn to decide on a plan for govern‐ ing the country. 
Uvod 09 01 Po padcu talibanskega režima leta 2001 so afganistanski predstavniki sodelovali na pogovorih v okviru ZN, ki so potekali v Bonnu, zaradi odločanja o načrtu za upravljanje države.
These talks led to the Bonn Agreement1, which established an Afghan Interim Authority to run the country, and called for the deployment of an international military force2 to as‐ sist the Authority in the maintenance of security in Kabul and the surround‐ ing areas (see Annex I). 
Ti pogovori so privedli do Bonnske-ga sporazuma1, s katerim je bila za vodenje države ustanovljena začasna oblast v Afganistanu in ki je pozval k razmestitvi mednarodnih vojaških sil2 za pomoč začasni oblasti pri ohranjanju varnosti v Kabulu in njegovi okolici (glej Prilogo I).
02 International donors meeting at the G8 conference held in Geneva in April 20023 adopted a reform programme based on a lead nation framework to deal with security issues in particular. 
02 Na srečanju mednarodnih donatorjev v okviru konference G83, ki je aprila 2002 potekala v Ženevi, je bil na podlagi okvira vodilnih držav sprejet reformni program, ki naj bi obravnaval zlasti varnostna vprašanja.
Under the framework, the security sec‐ tor was divided into five pillars, with five lead nations assigned to oversee and support reforms for each pillar. 
V tem okviru je bil varnostni sektor razdeljen na pet stebrov, za nadzor in podporo reformam v sklopu posameznega stebra pa je bilo določenih pet vodilnih držav.
The five lead nations were Germany (responsible for policing), Japan (disar‐ mament, demilitarisation and reinte‐ gration), Italy (justice), the United King‐ dom (combating drugs) and the USA (the army). 
Te so bile Nemčija (pristojna za policijsko delo), Japonska (razorožitev, demilitarizacija in ponovno vključe-vanje), Italija (pravosodje), Združeno kraljestvo (boj proti drogam) in ZDA (vojska).
In this context, the German Police Project Office commenced its work in April 2002. 
V zvezi s tem je aprila 2002 začel delovati urad projektne skupine nemške policije (GPPT).
The framework was meant to ensure burden sharing, but there was no mechanism to provide an overarching and coordinated approach to the international community’s secu‐ rity reform efforts. 
Okvir naj bi zagotovil delitev bremena, vendar ni bilo mehanizma, ki bi zagotovil celovit in usklajen pristop pri prizadevanjih mednarodne skupnosti za reformo varnostnega sektorja.
03 By 2005, the lead nation approach had weakened and the International Secu‐ rity Assistance Force (ISAF) became the de facto leader within the international community for developing the security sector in Afghanistan. 
03 Do leta 2005 je bil pristop na podlagi koncepta vodilnih držav oslabljen in ISAF je v mednarodni skupnosti prevzel dejansko vodilno vlogo pri razvoju varnostnega sektorja v Afganistanu.
In a Joint Decla‐ ration4, the EU and its Member States committed themselves to supporting the Government of Afghanistan in es‐ tablishing a stronger framework of rule of law in the country (see Figure 1). 
EU in njene države članice so se v skupni deklaraciji4 zavezale, da bodo podpirale afganistansko vlado pri vzpostavljanju močnejšega okvira pravne države v Afganistanu (glej sliko 1).
1 Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending Re‐establishment of Permanent Institutions, Bonn, 5 December 2001. 
1 Sporazum o začasni ureditvi v Afganistanu do ponovne vzpostavitve stalnih vladnih organov, Bonn, 5. decembra 2001.
2 In response, UN Security Council Resolution 1386 of December 20, 2001, authorised the creation of an International Security Assistance Force. 
2 V odgovor na ta poziv je bila z resolucijo Varnostnega sveta ZN št. 1386 z dne 20. decembra 2001 odobrena vzpostavitev Mednarodnih varnostnih sil za pomoč (ISAF).
In 2011, 25 EU Member States had deployed about 33 000 troops to the ISAF. 
Leta 2011 je 25 držav članic EU v ISAF razmestilo približno 33 000 vojakov.
3 TheG8isthenameofaforum for the governments of a group of eight leading advanced economies (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States) and the European Commission. 
3 Skupina G8 je ime foruma vlad osmih vodilnih razvitih gospodarstev (Kanade, Francije, Nemčije, Italije, Japonske, Rusije, Združenega kraljestva in Združenih držav Amerike) in Evropske komisije.
4 EU Joint Declaration ‘Committing to a new EU Afghan Partnership’, 16 November 2005. 
4 Skupna izjava EU „Zaveza novemu partnerstvu med EU in Afganistanom”, 16. november 2005.
Dotted line represents approximately the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. 
Črtkana črta približno prikazuje nadzorno črto v Jamuju in Kašmirju, o kateri sta se dogovorila Indija in Pakistan.
The final status of Jammu and Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. 
Strani še nista dosegli dogovora o končnem statusu Jamuja in Kašmirja.
P A K I S T A N d n I ( Figure 1 d i d n a C H I N A INDIA I S L A M I C R E P U B L I C O F I R A N H l h m 36° 34° 32° 30° Gowd-e Zereh 62° 68° 72° - Shindand Ghazni GHAZNI Gardez PAKTYA KHOST Farah Now Zad Kajaki Sharan PAKTIKA Zaranj NIMROZ HILMAND Deh Shu 64° Source: UNITED NATIONS 64° 66°UZBEKISTAN 68° Kiroya 70° Kerki Andkhvoy Qurghonteppa (Kurgan-Tyube) Sari Pul FARYAB Tokzar Shulgarah SAMANGAN BAGHLAN Keleft JAWZJAN Rostaq Khanabad TAKHAR Baghlan Farkhar Dowshi FayyzzAabad Eshkashem Qala-I-Panjeh SARI PUL Dowlat PANJSHER AFGHANISTAN Bazarak KUNDI Nili Qarah ZABUL Qalat Chaman Quetta Peshawar Islamabad Rawalpindi BALKH Kholm Dusti KUNDUZ Taluoqan Jorm 0 0 50 100 150 50 100 70° 200 250 km 150 mi KABUL Pul-e-Alam Peywar Pass Shahr WARDAK LOGAR NANGARHAR Mardan 
P A K I S T A N R a b a d n a t g u r r A a H h s i a h r a a r F a u L k m P a r a l e n - r d a T w o D h a h s u Zabol Chehar Borjak Zahedan Map No. 3958 Rev. 7 June 2011 Lashkar Gah Kadesh Tirin Kot Kandahar Spin Buldak KANDAHAR 66° Glavno mesto države Glavno mesto pokrajine Mesto, vas Letališča Mednarodna meja Pokrajinska meja Glavna cesta Stranska cesta Železnica 74° Department of Field Support Cartographic Section - Shindand Ghazni GHAZNI Gardez PAKTYA KHOST Farah Now Zad Kajaki Sharan PAKTIKA d n I Zaranj NIMROZ HILMAND Deh Shu 64° d i d n a C H I N A INDIA I S L A M I C R E P U B L I C O F I R A N H l h m 36° 34° 32° 30° Gowd-e Zereh 62° 68° 0 0 50 100 50 150 200 100 70° 250 km 150 mi 72° Source: UNITED NATIONS 64° 66°UZBEKISTAN 68° Kiroya 70° Kerki Andkhvoy Qurghonteppa (Kurgan-Tyube) Sari Pul FARYAB Tokzar Shulgarah SAMANGAN BAGHLAN Keleft JAWZJAN Rostaq Khanabad TAKHAR Baghlan Farkhar Dowshi FayyzzAabad Eshkashem Qala-I-Panjeh SARI PUL Dowlat PANJSHER AFGHANISTAN Bazarak KUNDI Nili Qarah ZABUL Qalat Chaman Quetta Peshawar Islamabad Rawalpindi BALKH Kholm Dusti KUNDUZ Taluoqan Jorm KABUL Pul-e-Alam Peywar Pass Shahr WARDAK LOGAR NANGARHAR Mardan
Introduction 11 04 The 2006 Afghanistan Compact, launched at the London conference in January 2006, provided a new frame‐ work for cooperation between the elected government of Afghanistan and the international community. 
Uvod 11 04 Afganistanski dogovor iz leta 2006, ki je nastal na londonski konferenci januarja 2006, je zagotovil nov okvir za sodelovanje med izvoljeno vlado Afganistana in mednarodno skupnostjo.
In this context, a joint EU assessment mis‐ sion was carried out in autumn 2006 to assess Afghan needs in the rule of law sector. 
V tem kontekstu je bila jeseni leta 2006 izvedena skupna ocenjevalna misija EU, da bi se ocenile afganistanske potrebe v sektorju pravne države.
It was followed in November 2006 by a fact‐finding mission which proposed a joint EU intervention based around a strategic approach for building a functioning national police force with a country‐wide remit. 
Novembra 2006 ji je sledila misija za ugotavljanje dejstev, v okviru katere je bil oblikovan predlog o skupni intervenciji EU na podlagi strateškega pristopa k vzpostavljanju delujoče nacionalne policije s pristojnostmi za celotno državo.
This proposal was supported by the Afghan government, which sent a letter on 16 May 2007 inviting the EU to launch a police mission (see Box 1). 
Ta predlog je podprla afganistanska vlada, ki je 16. maja 2007 poslala dopis, s katerim je EU povabila k vzpostavitvi policijske misije (glej okvir 1).
CSDP missions The Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) enables the EU to take a leading role in peacekeeping operations, conflict prevention and the strengthening of international security. 
Misije SVOP Skupna varnostna in obrambna politika (SVOP) omogoča, da EU prevzame vodilno vlogo pri operacijah za ohranjanje miru, preprečevanju konfliktov in krepitvi mednarodne varnosti.
It is a part of the EU’s compre‐ hensive approach towards crisis management, drawing on civilian and military assets. 
Je del celovitega pristopa EU h kriznemu upravljanju, opira pa se na civilna in vojaška sredstva.
CSDP missions are of two kinds: civilian missions financed by the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) budget, and military missions financed by the Member States. 
Misije SVOP so dveh vrst: civilne misije, financirane iz proračuna za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko (SZVP), in vojaške misije, ki jih financirajo države članice.
Civilian CSDP missions vary in scope (police, monitoring, judicial or security sector reform), in nature (executive or non‐executive) and in size. 
Civilne misije SVOP se razlikujejo po področju (policija, spremljanje, reforma pravosodnega ali varnostnega sektorja), naravi (misije z izvršilnimi pooblastili ali brez njih) in velikosti.
As at the end of 2014, the EU had deployed a total of 32 CSDP missions, 16 of which had been completed and wound up and 16 were still ongoing (11 civilian and five military missions). 
Na koncu leta 2014 je EU razmestila skupno 32 misij SVOP. Od tega jih je bilo 16 končanih in zaključenih, 16 pa jih je še potekalo (11 civilnih misij in pet vojaških).
05 On 30 May 2007, the Council decided to establish the EU police mission in Afghanistan5 (EUPOL). 
05 Svet je 30. maja 2007 sklenil5 ustanoviti policijsko misijo EU v Afganistanu (EUPOL).
EUPOL was meant to build on the efforts of the German Police Project Office and to seek to harmonise the approaches and efforts of the various partners involved in police reform. 
EUPOL naj bi nadaljevala prizadevanja urada projektne skupine nemške policije in skušala uskladiti pristope in prizadevanja različnih partnerjev, ki sodelujejo pri reformi policije.
The aim was to con‐ tribute to the establishment of sus‐ tainable and effective civilian policing arrangements, under Afghan owner‐ ship, that would ensure appropriate interaction with the wider criminal justice system (see Box 2). 
Cilj je bil prispevati k vzpostavitvi trajnostne in uspešne ureditve policijskega dela, za katero bi imel lastno odgovornost Afganistan in ki naj bi zagotovila ustrezno interakcijo s širšim kazenskopravnim sistemom (glej okvir 2).
5 Council Joint Action 2007/369/ CFSP of 30 May 2007 on establishment of the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL Afghanistan) (OJ L 139, 31.5.2007, p. 
5 Skupni ukrep Sveta 2007/369/ SZVP z dne 30. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi policijske misije Evropske unije v Afganistanu (EUPOL Afghanistan) (UL L 139, 31.5.2007, str.
Introduction 12 EUPOL EUPOL started operations on 15 June 2007. 
Uvod 12 EUPOL EUPOL, ki je začela delovati 15. junija 2007, je civilna misija SVOP.
It is a civilian CSDP mission supporting the reform efforts of the Afghan government in building an improved civilian police service operating within the framework of the rule of law and respect for human rights. 
Podpira reformna prizadevanja afganistanske vlade za vzpostavitev izboljšane civilne policije, ki bi delovala v okvirih pravne države in spoštovanja človekovih pravic.
The Civilian Operation Commander, who is also the Director of the Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC), exercises command and control of EUPOL at a strategic level, under the political control and strate‐ gic direction of the Political and Security Committee. 
Civilni poveljnik operacije, ki je hkrati direktor civilne zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij, izvaja funkcijo poveljevanja in nadzora EUPOL na strateški ravni pod političnim nadzorom in strateškim vodenjem Političnega in varnostnega odbora.
The Head of Mission exercises operational control over EUPOL and assumes its day‐to‐day management. 
Vodja misije izvaja operativni nadzor nad EUPOL in zagotavlja dnevno upravljanje.
EUPOL Afghanistan activities are principally carried out by police and rule of law experts seconded from EU Member States, as well as contracted international experts and local staff. 
Dejavnosti EUPOL Afghanistan izvajajo predvsem policija in strokovnjaki za pravno državo, napoteni iz držav članic EU, pa tudi pogodbeno zaposleni mednarodni strokovnjaki in lokalni uslužbenci.
The mission works through training and mentoring, advising and monitoring the senior leadership of relevant Afghan institutions (Ministry of the Interior, Afghan National Police, Ministry of Justice and the Attorney General’s Office). 
Delo misije poteka z usposabljanjem in mentorstvom, svetovanjem višjemu vodstvu ustreznih afganistanskih institucij (ministrstvo za notranje zadeve, afganistanska nacionalna policija, ministrstvo za pravosodje in urad generalnega državnega pravobranilca) in njegovim spremljanjem.
It has also carried out a number of projects. 
Izvedla je tudi več projektov.
EUPOL Afghanistan implements its mandate along three lines of operations: ο Line of Operation 1: Advancing institutional reform of the Ministry of the Interior. ο Line of Operation 2: Professionalising the national police. ο Line of Operation 3: Connecting the national police to the wider justice system. 
EUPOL Afghanistan izvaja svoj mandat v okviru treh linij operacij: ο linija operacij 1: spodbujanje institucionalne reforme ministrstva za notranje zadeve, ο linija operacij 2: profesionalizacija nacionalne policije, ο linija operacij 3: povezovanje nacionalne policije s širšim pravosodnim sistemom.
At the time of the audit in late 2014, EUPOL had operations in Kabul, Herat and Mazar‐e Sharif. 
V času revizije na koncu leta 2014 so operacije EUPOL potekale v Kabulu, Heratu in Mazar-e Šarifu.
06 The total cost of EUPOL for the period May 2007 to December 2014 was close to 400 million euro. 
06 Skupni stroški EUPOL za obdobje od maja 2007 do decembra 2014 so znašali približno 400 milijonov EUR.
Security‐related costs accounted for almost one third of that amount 6 (see also Annex II). 
Skoraj tretjina tega zneska6 je bila namenjena stroškom za varnost (glej tudi Prilogo II).
6 This figure includes all commitments up to the end of 2014, thus it does not reflect the most recent commitment of 57.75 million euro for 2015 (Council Decision 2014/922/ CFSP of 17 December 2014 amending and extending Decision 2010/279/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN) (OJ L 363, 18.12.2014, p. 
6 Ta številčni podatek vključuje vse prevzete obveznosti do konca leta 2014, zato ne odraža najnovejše prevzete obveznosti v višini 57,75 milijona EUR za leto 2015 (Sklep Sveta 2014/922/SZVP z dne 17. decembra 2014 o spremembi in podaljšanju Sklepa 2010/279/SZVP o policijski misiji Evropske unije v Afganistanu (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN) (UL L 363, 18.12.2014, str.
The Council has approved 10 financing decisions (and extensions of financing decisions) amounting to 392.4 million euro of commitments and respective disbursements of 346.2 million euro. 
Svet je odobril deset sklepov o financiranju (in podaljšanj sklepov o financiranju) v višini 392,4 milijona EUR prevzetih obveznosti in 346,2 milijona EUR s tem povezanih plačil.
Staff costs (for seconded, international contracted and about 200 local staff) represent about 43 % of the EUPOL budget, while the security of personnel and premises accounts for 28%. Box 2 
Stroški za uslužbence (napotene, mednarodne pogodbene in približno 200 lokalnih) predstavljajo približno 43 % proračuna EUPOL, varnost osebja in prostorov pa 28 %. Okvir 2
Audit scope and approach 13 07 The Court assessed whether EUPOL Afghanistan had been effective in de‐ livering its mandate. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski 13 pristop 07 Sodišče je ocenilo, ali je bila EUPOL Afghanistan uspešna pri izvajanju svojega mandata.
The audit focused on the following questions: (a) Was EUPOL well planned and set up? (b) Has EUPOL been well coordinated with Member States, other interna‐ tional stakeholders and the Afghan authorities? (c) Has EUPOL received adequate operational support and guidance given its mandate? (d) Has EUPOL contributed to the progress of the Afghan National Police and are the results likely to be sustainable? (e) Has the phasing out of EUPOL been adequately prepared? 
Revizija je bila osredotočena na naslednja vprašanja: (a) Ali je bila EUPOL dobro načrtovana in vzpostavljena? (b) Ali je bila EUPOL dobro usklajena z državami članicami, drugimi mednarodnimi deležniki in afganistanskimi organi? (c) Ali je EUPOL glede na svoj mandat dobila ustrezno operativno podporo in usmerjanje? (d) Ali je EUPOL prispevala k napredku afganistanske nacionalne policije in ali je verjetno, da bodo rezultati trajnostni? (e) Ali je bilo postopno ukinjanje EUPOL ustrezno pripravljeno?
08 The audit covered the period from EUPOL’s launch in 2007 until the end of 2014. 
08 Revizija je zajela obdobje od vzpostavitve EUPOL leta 2007 do konca leta 2014.
It focused in particular on EUPOL activities after 2012. 
Osredotočena je bila predvsem na dejavnosti EUPOL po letu 2012.
09 The audit was carried out between July and December 2014. 
09 Revizija je bila izvedena med julijem in decembrom 2014.
The Court gathered evidence for its assessment through various means: (a) documentary analysis and litera‐ ture review; (b) an on‐the‐spot visit to Kabul in September 2014 to examine sup‐ porting documentation, to review EUPOL’s procedures and systems and finally to interview national police officers, staff of the Min‐ istries of the Interior and Justice, EUPOL staff (including trainers and mentors), the EU Special Repre‐ sentative in Afghanistan (EUSR), staff at the EU delegation in Kabul, ISAF and NATO personnel, the International Police Coordination Board of Afghanistan (IPCB), the United Nations Development Pro‐ gramme (UNDP) in Kabul and six EU representations in Afghanistan7; interviews with key staff of the Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC), the Crisis Man‐ agement and Planning Directorate (CMPD), the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments (FPI), the geographical desk officers at the EEAS and the Commission; inter‐ views were also held with repre‐ sentatives of five Member States8 participating in the Committee for Civilian Aspects of Crisis Manage‐ ment (Civcom) and, finally, NATO staff; review of a sample of six moni‐ toring, mentoring and advising activities and 11 projects which were planned and implemented between 2011 and 2014 (see Annex III). 
Sodišče je dokaze za svojo oceno pridobilo z različnimi sredstvi: (a) analizo dokumentacije in pregledom literature; (b) obiskom na kraju samem v Kabulu septembra 2014 zaradi preučitve dokazil, pregleda postopkov in sistemov EUPOL ter pogovorov z nacionalnimi policisti, uslužbenci ministrstev za notranje zadeve in pravosodje, uslužbenci EUPOL (vključno z vodji usposabljanj in mentorji), posebnim predstavnikom EU (PPEU) v Afganistanu, uslužbenci delegacije EU v Kabulu, osebjem ISAF in Nata, Mednarodnim odborom za usklajevanje policije v Afganistanu (IPCB), uslužbenci Programa Združenih narodov za razvoj (UNDP) v Kabulu in uslužbenci šestih predstavništev EU v Afganistanu7; pogovori s ključnimi uslužbenci civilne zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij, direktorata za krizno upravljanje in načrtovanje, Službe za instrumente zunanje politike (FPI) ter z referenti za geografsko regijo v ESZD in na Komisiji; potekali so tudi pogovori s predstavniki petih držav članic8, ki sodelujejo v Odboru za civilne vidike kriznega upravljanja (Civcom), ter uslužbenci Nata; pregledom vzorca šestih dejavnosti spremljanja, mentorstva in svetovanja ter enajstih projektov, ki so bili načrtovani in izvedeni med letoma 2011 in 2014 (glej Prilogo III).
7 Representations (either Ambassadors or Heads of Mission) of France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. 
7 Predstavništva (veleposlaniki ali vodje misij) Francije, Nemčije, Italije, Nizozemske, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva.
8 Representatives of Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, as well as the Chairman of Civcom. (c) (d) 
8 Predstavniki Nemčije, Italije, Nizozemske in Združenega kraljestva ter predsednik Civcom. (c) (d)
Observations 14 A relevant mandate, yet a problematic start 10 The Court examined whether the set‐ ting up and deployment of EUPOL was preceded by a comprehensive assess‐ ment of Afghan needs. 
Opažanja 14 Ustrezen mandat, vendar problematičen začetek 10 Sodišče je preučilo, ali je bila pred vzpostavitvijo in razmestitvijo EUPOL opravljena izčrpna ocena afganistanskih potreb.
It also assessed EUPOL’s offices whether operational challenges in con‐ nection with the deployment of EUPOL had been given due attention. 
Ocenilo je tudi, ali je bila Pisarne EUPOL namenjena potrebna pozornost operativnim izzivom pri razmestitvi EUPOL.