natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal of the European Union C 375/225 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Member States’ systems related to the regularity of transactions in agriculture 7.37. Member States' authorities are responsible for putting in place and operating: (a) appropriate administrative and control procedures to ensure the accuracy of declarations made by claimants and the fulfilment of eligibility requirements; (b) on-the-spot checks which, depending on the aid scheme, should cover at least 5% of all beneficiaries or of the relevant expenditure. 
13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/225 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Sistemi držav članic, povezani s pravilnostjo transakcij na področju kmetijstva 7.37 Organi držav članic so odgovorni, da vzpostavijo in izvajajo: (a) (b) ustrezne administrativne in kontrolne postopke za zagotovitev točnosti izjav vlagateljev in izpolnjevanja zahtev za upravičenost; preglede na kraju samem, ki morajo glede na shemo pomoči zajeti vsaj 5% vseh upravičencev ali zadevnih odhodkov.
We based our systems examination on audits carried out by the Commission (DG AGRI). 
7.38 na revizijah, ki jih je izvedla Komisija (GD AGRI).
Within the sample of 24 conformity audits we reviewed (see paragraph 7.32), the Commission reported significant weaknesses for 17 of the systems concerned (34). 
V vzorcu 24 revizij skladnosti, ki jih je pregledalo Sodišče (glej odstavek 7.32), je Komisija pri 17 zadevnih sistemih poročala o bistvenih slabostih (34).
Since we found that the Commission’s work was overall satisfactory (see paragraph 7.33), we can rely on the Commission’s assessment of these systems. 
Ker je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je bilo delo Komisije na splošno zadovoljivo (glej odstavek 7.33), se lahko zanese na njeno oceno teh sistemov.
7.39. In the six Member States we visited (see paragraph 7.32), we also performed additional audit work for a limited number of risk-prone areas(35). 
7.39 V šestih obiskanih državah članicah (glej odstavek 7.32), je Sodišče izvedlo tudi dodatno revizijsko delo za omejeno število področij, dovzetnih za napake(35).
Our findings for the EAGF, rural development, and cross-compliance are set out in the following paragraphs. 
Ugotovitve Sodišča v zvezi z EKJS, razvojem podeželja in navzkrižno skladnostjo so navedene v naslednjih odstavkih.
Member States' systems related to regularity of EAGF transactions 7.40. The Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) is the main management and control system for direct aid payments (36). 
Sistemi držav članic, povezani s pravilnostjo transakcij EKJS 7.40 Integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem (IAKS) je glavni upravljavski in kontrolni sistem za plačila neposredne pomoči (36).
The system consists of databases of farm holdings and aid applications, a Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS; see also paragraphs 7.17 and 7.18), animal databases and a database of entitlements in the Member States implementing the SPS. 
Obsega podatkovne zbirke o kmetijskih gospodarstvih in zahtevkih za pomoč ter identifikacijski sistem za zemljišča (LPIS, glej tudi odstavka 7.17 in 7.18), podatkovne zbirke o živalih in podatkovno zbirko pravic v državah članicah, ki izvajajo SEP.
The paying agencies carry out administrative cross-checks between these databases with the objective of ensuring that payments are made for the correct amount, to eligible beneficiaries for eligible land or animals. 
Plačilne agencije izvajajo administrativne navzkrižne preglede med temi podatkovnimi zbirkami, ki naj bi zagotovili, da so plačila izvršena za točne zneske in upravičenim upravičencem za upravičena zemljišča ali živali.
(35) Such areas were not in the scope of the Commission’s audits we reviewed, for the Member States concerned. 
(35) Ta področja za zadevne države članice niso bila vključena v revizije Komisije, ki jih je pregledalo.
The Commission’s audits focus on specific aspects of the paying agencies’ control systems, selected on the basis of a risk analysis, and do not cover all control areas in all paying agencies every year. 
Revizije Komisije so osredotočene na posebne vidike sistemov kontrole v plačilnih agencijah, izbranih na podlagi analize tveganja, in ne zajemajo vseh področij kontrole v vseh plačilnih agencijah vsako leto.
(36) For area-related rural development measures, verification of certain key elements such as eligible area is also made through the IACS. 
(36) Tudi pri ukrepih za razvoj podeželja, vezanih na površino, se nekateri ključni elementi, kot je upravičena površina, preverjajo z IAKS.
EN C 375/226 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 7.41. In our 2014 annual report, we stated that IACS makes a significant contribution in preventing and reducing the levels of error in the aid scheme to which it applies (37). 
C 375/226 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 7.41 Sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2014 navedlo, da IAKS bistveno prispeva k preprečevanju in zmanjšanju stopenj napake v shemah pomoči, za katere se uporablja(37).
This year, we examined the reliability of selected key control functions in the IACS at the six paying agencies visited (see paragraph 7.32). 
Letos je Sodišče preučilo zanesljivost izbranih ključnih kontrolnih funkcij v IAKS v šestih obiskanih plačilnih agencijah (glej odstavek 7.32).
Without calling into question IACS contribution in preventing and reducing the levels of error, we found that some of the key control functions we examined were affected by weaknesses. 
Ne da bi bil zato vprašljiv prispevek IAKS k preprečevanju in zmanjšanju stopenj napake, je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so na nekatere preučene ključne kontrolne funkcije vplivale slabosti.
These related to the LPIS, the administrative controls, the quality of on-the-spot inspections and the recovery procedures for incorrect payments(38). 
Te so bile v zvezi z LPIS, administrativnimi kontrolami, kakovostjo inšpekcijskih pregledov na kraju samem in postopki izterjave nepravilnih plačil (38).
We provide an example of the weaknesses we identified in Figure 7.9. 
Na sliki 7.9 je primer ugotovljenih slabosti.
Figure 7.9 — Example of the weaknesses found concerning the LPIS For six consecutive years (2010-2015) in the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) the annual LPIS quality assessment showed that it failed to comply with several quality elements required by EU legislation. 
Slika 7.9 – Primer ugotovljenih slabosti v zvezi z LPIS V Združenem kraljestvu (Severna Irska) se je pri letni oceni kakovosti LPIS že šest let zapored (2010–2015) pokazalo, da ni skladna z več elementi kakovosti, ki jih zahteva zakonodaja EU.
Despite the legal obligation to put in place remedial action in such situations, the quality assessment for 2015 showed that there was no consistent improvement: overall, the eligible areas recorded in the Northern Ireland LPIS were overstated by more than 2 %, leading to a risk of irregular payments. 
Kljub pravni obveznosti uvedbe popravnih ukrepov v takih primerih se je pri oceni kakovosti za leto 2015 pokazalo, da ni bilo doslednega izboljšanja: na splošno so bile upravičene površine v LPIS Severne Irske previsoko navedene za več kot 2 %, zaradi česar je obstajalo tveganje nepravilnih plačil.
We have already reported the weaknesses in the Northern Ireland LPIS in our 2012 annual report (Annex 3.2). 
O slabostih v LPIS Severne Irske je Sodišče poročalo že v letnem poročilu za leto 2012 (Priloga 3.2).
Figure 7.9 — Example of the weaknesses found concerning the LPIS From 2013, corrective actions were taken by the Northern Irish authorities following audits carried out by the Commission. 
Slika 7.9 – Primer ugotovljenih slabosti v zvezi z LPIS Od leta 2013 so organi Severne Irske po revizijah Komisije sprejeli popravljalne ukrepe.
The estimation of eligible area in the LPIS quality assessment (QA) was ‘non-conforming’ for 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2015. 
Ocena upravičenih površin v oceni kakovosti sistema LPIS je bila v letih 2010, 2011, 2012 in 2015 „neskladna“.
The reasons were explained by the UK-NI authorities in the respective annual QA reports. 
Organi Velike Britanije in Severne Irske so razloge za to pojasnili v ustreznih letnih poročilih o oceni kakovosti.
In the years when the 3-year LPIS refresh started (2013, 2014), the number of non-conforming parcels decreased. 
V letih, ko se je začela triletna posodobitev sistema LPIS (2013, 2014), se je število neskladnih parcel zmanjšalo.
However, in 2015, the UK-NI authorities detected that there was an increase of the number of parcels with no eligible area which had not been identified through the refresh programme. 
Vendar so organi Velike Britanije in Severne Irske leta 2015 odkrili povečanje števila parcel brez upravičenih površin, ki v okviru programa posodobitve niso bile ugotovljene.
The Commission continues to closely monitor the situation. 
Komisija še naprej natančno spremlja stanje.
(37) 2014 annual report, paragraph 7.35. 
(37) Odstavek 7.35 letnega poročila za leto 2014.
(38) We found each of these key controls to be deficient in at least one of the six paying agencies visited. 
(38) Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so vse ključne kontrole pomanjkljive v vsaj eni od šestih obiskanih plačilnih agencij.
Albeit to varying extents, we found weaknesses in all the six paying agencies. 
Ugotovilo je različno velike slabosti v vseh šestih plačilnih agencijah.
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal of the European Union C 375/227 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Member States' systems related to regularity of transactions in rural development 7.42. For five out of the six paying agencies visited (see paragraph 7.32), we identified deficiencies in administrative checks related to eligibility conditions, in particular those concerning public procurement. 
13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/227 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA Sistemi držav članic, povezani s pravilnostjo transakcij na področju razvoja podeželja 7.42 Pri petih od šestih obiskanih plačilnih agencij (glej odstavek 7.32) je Sodišče ugotovilo pomanjkljivosti pri administrativnih pregledih v zvezi s pogoji za upravičenost, zlasti tistimi za javna naročila.
These system weaknesses were very similar to those found and reported in previous years (39). 
Te sistemske slabosti so bile zelo podobne tistim, ki jih je Sodišče ugotovilo in o katerih je poročalo v prejšnjih letih(39).
System failures are an important cause of the errors detected during transaction testing (see paragraph 7.24). 
Sistemske pomanjkljivosti so pomemben vzrok za napake, odkrite pri preizkušanju transakcij (glej odstavek 7.24).
For public procurement, we examined a sample of 41 projects (in addition to our transaction testing), of which eight (20 %) were affected by errors. 
7.43 Za javna naročila je Sodišče preučilo vzorec 41 projektov (poleg preizkušanja transakcij) in na osem (20 %) od njih so vplivale napake.
In three out of the eight cases, we identified ineligible expenditure, amounting in total to more than 1,5 million euro of EAFRD aid. 7.44. 
V treh primerih od osmih je Sodišče ugotovilo neupravičene odhodke v skupni višini več kot 1,5 milijona EUR pomoči EKSRP.
In an effort to reduce the level of error in rural development spending, the Commission and the Member States are implementing action plans to identify the causes of error and to implement targeted corrective action to reduce the risk of errors occurring. 
7.44 V prizadevanju za zmanjšanje stopnje napake pri porabi na področju razvoja podeželja Komisija in države članice izvajajo akcijske načrte za ugotavljanje vzrokov za napake in izvedbo usmerjenih popravljalnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganja njihovega nastanka.
7.45. We looked at 14 of the most significant quantifiable errors detected in eight Member States during our 2015 transaction testing. 
7.45 Sodišče je pregledalo 14 najbistvenejših količinsko opredeljivih napak, ki jih je odkrilo med preizkušanjem transakcij za leto 2015 v osmih državah članicah.
We noted that seven out of the eight had already updated their action plans by February 2016, including measures to address some of the issues we found. 
Ugotovilo je, da je sedem od osmih držav do februarja 2016 že posodobilo svoje akcijske načrte, vključno z ukrepi za obravnavo nekaterih zadev, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče.
During our examination of Member States’ systems, however, we found that the four paying agencies where we had detected weaknesses in the administrative checks on public procurement procedures had not included any action on this issue in their action plans. 
Med preučevanjem sistemov držav članic pa je Sodišče ugotovilo, da štiri plačilne agencije, v katerih so bile odkrite slabosti v administrativnih pregledih postopkov javnega naročanja, v svoje akcijske načrte niso vključile nobenih ukrepov v zvezi s to zadevo.
While we consider that the action plans are generally a sound tool to address the causes of errors, there is still scope for further improvement in the area of public procurement. 
Sodišče sicer meni, da so akcijski načrti na splošno dobro sredstvo za obravnavo vzrokov za napake, vendar jih je na področju javnega naročanja še mogoče izboljšati.
The Commission carries out conformity audits in the Member States to verify that the expenditure paid is in compliance with the rules. 
7.42 Komisija v državah članicah izvaja revizije skladnosti, s katerimi preverja, ali so plačani odhodki skladni s pravili.
In these audits, the Commission also found weaknesses in administrative checks related to eligibility conditions and public procurement. 
Komisija je pri teh revizijah ugotovila slabosti pri administrativnih pregledih v zvezi s pogoji za upravičenost in javnim naročanjem.
Corrective actions have been implemented, including when necessary action plans. 
Izvedeni so bili popravljalni ukrepi, vključno z akcijskimi načrti, kjer je bilo to potrebno.
In addition reservations were made in the 2015 annual activity report. 
Dodatno so bili v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2015 izrečeni pridržki.
Financial corrections have also been made in this respect and a number of conformity clearance procedures are currently ongoing and are likely to lead to further financial corrections. 
V zvezi s tem so bili izvedeni tudi finančni popravki, trenutno pa poteka vrsta postopkov potrditve skladnosti, kar bo verjetno vodilo do nadaljnjih finančnih popravkov.
A dedicated audit of public procurement was launched in 2015 in 4 Member States. 
Leta 2015 se je v štirih državah članicah začela posebna revizija javnih naročil.
Other Member States will be audited in 2016. 
Ostale države članice bodo revidirane leta 2016.
When weaknesses are identified in the framework of conformity audits and audits by the Court, the Commission always requests that Member States take corrective actions, which may take the form of an action plan. 
7.45 Ko se v okviru revizij skladnosti in revizij Sodišča ugotovijo slabosti, Komisija od držav članic vedno zahteva, da izvedejo popravljalne ukrepe, ki so lahko v obliki akcijskega načrta.
Following the Court’s recommendations in special report No 23/2014, the Commission has recommended all Member States to pay particular attention to the issue of public procurement and, where necessary, take remedial actions. 
Na podlagi priporočil Sodišča v Posebnem poročilu št. 23/14 je Komisija vsem državam članicam priporočala, da so še posebej pozorne na vprašanja v zvezi z javnim naročanjem in da izvedejo popravljalne ukrepe, če je to potrebno.
(39) See paragraph 7.53 of the 2014 annual report, paragraph 4.20 of the 2013 annual report, paragraphs 4.21 to 4.25 of the 2012 annual report. 
(39) Glej odstavek 7.53 letnega poročila za leto 2014, odstavek 4.20 letnega poročila za leto 2013 in odstavke 4.21 do 4.25 letnega poročila za leto 2012.
In particular, we analysed the reliability of control statistics and the procedures put in place to ensure that Member States appropriately check cross-compliance requirements for protecting waters against nitrates (the Nitrates Directive (40)) and for cattle notifications (41). 
Zlasti je analiziralo zanesljivost kontrolnih statističnih podatkov in postopkov, ki so bili vzpostavljeni za zagotovitev, da države članice ustrezno preverjajo zahteve navzkrižne skladnosti za varstvo voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati (direktiva o nitratih (40)) in za obvestila v zvezi z govedom (41).
We also reviewed 63 control reports. 
Pregledalo je tudi 63 poročil o nadzoru.
7.47. We found deficiencies, mainly relating to the reliability of control statistics and sampling, in five out of the six Member States visited. 
7.47 Sodišče je ugotovilo pomanjkljivosti zlasti v zvezi z zanesljivostjo kontrolnih statističnih podatkov in vzorčenjem v petih od šestih obiskanih držav članic.
We found problems (e.g. incorrect calculation of sanctions or lack of checks on certain requirements) in 13 of the 63 control reports reviewed. 
V 13 od 63 pregledanih poročil o nadzoru je ugotovilo probleme (na primer nepravilen izračun sankcij ali to, da v zvezi z nekaterimi zahtevami ni dovolj pregledov).
Moreover, in Lithuania and the UK (Northern Ireland) in four of the 24 control reports sampled the sanctions were not correctly included in the control statistics. 
Poleg tega v Litvi in Združenem kraljestvu (Severna Irska) v štirih od 24 poročil o nadzoru v vzorcu sankcije niso bile pravilno vključene v kontrolne statistične podatke.
We give another example of the deficiencies we identified in Figure 7.10. of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 7.46. 
Dodaten primer ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti je na sliki 7.10.
The Commission notes that cross-compliance does not relate to assessment of the legality and regularity of underlying transactions. 7.47. 
7.46 Komisija opozarja, da navzkrižna skladnost ne zadeva ocene zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij.
The Commission shares the Court’s observation and pays particular attention to these requirements during its audits. 
7.47 Komisija se strinja z opažanjem Sodišča in tem zahtevam pri svojih revizijah namenja posebno pozornost.
In many of them, the Commission has observed weaknesses in the scope and quality of cross-compliance controls. 
Pri številnih revizijah je Komisija ugotovila slabosti glede obsega in kakovosti pregledov navzkrižne skladnosti.
When a systemic non-compliance is established, the Commission always requests corrective actions, including actions plans whenever necessary and ensures the protection of the EU budget via the conformity clearance procedure. 
Komisija v primeru ugotovljene sistemske neskladnosti vedno zahteva popravljalne ukrepe, po potrebi vključno z akcijskimi načrti, in s postopki potrditve skladnosti zagotovi zaščito proračuna EU.
(40) Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 
(40) Direktiva Sveta 91/676/EGS z dne 12. decembra 1991 o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov (UL L 375, 31.12.1991, str.
(41) EU legislation on cross-compliance requires cattle movements/ births/deaths to be notified to the national animal database within seven days. 
(41) Na podlagi zakonodaje EU o navzkrižni skladnosti je treba vse premike/rojstva/smrti govedi v sedmih dneh sporočiti za vnos v nacionalno podatkovno zbirko o živalih.
Such rules are important for reducing the risk of diseases spreading, by controlling animal movements and improving traceability. 
Taka pravila so pomembna za zmanjšanje tveganja širjenja bolezni z nadziranjem premikov živali in izboljšanjem njihove sledljivosti.
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal of the European Union C 375/229 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES Figure 7.10 — Example of insufficient cross-compliance checks In Lithuania we found that national authorities did not sufficiently check the cross-compliance requirements for protecting waters against nitrates, which are applicable to all farmers. 
13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/229 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Slika 7.10 – Primer nezadostnih pregledov navzkrižne skladnosti V Litvi je Sodišče ugotovilo, da nacionalni organi niso dovolj preverjali zahtev navzkrižne skladnosti za varstvo voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati, ki veljajo za vse kmete.
The Member State used several thresholds, under which farmers were not subject to cross-compliance checks for requirements resulting from the Nitrates Directive. 
Država članica je uporabljala več pragov, pod katerimi se za kmete niso izvajali pregledi navzkrižne skladnosti v zvezi z zahtevami iz direktive o nitratih.
For example, farmers with a utilised agricultural area of 10 hectares or less do not need to declare the level of fertiliser used. 
Na primer kmetom, ki uporabljajo kmetijske površine, velike do 10 hektarov, ni treba prijaviti količine uporabljenega gnojila.
Such farmers account for more than 70 % of all farmers and use 14 % of the agricultural area. 
Ti kmetje pomenijo več kot 70% vseh kmetov in uporabljajo 14% kmetijskih površin.
As another example, livestock farmers who keep fewer than 10 livestock units in one place do not need to have a manure storage of the relevant capacity. 
Drug primer, živinorejcem, ki imajo manj kot 10 glav živine na istem mestu, ni treba imeti skladišča za gnoj ustrezne zmogljivosti.
Such farmers constitute 87 % of all livestock farmers and keep 28 % of all livestock units in Lithuania. 
Ti kmetje pomenijo 87 % vseh živinorejcev in imajo 28% vse živine v Litvi.
The Nitrates Directive aims at protecting the environment and citizens’ health. 
Direktiva o nitratih je namenjena varstvu okolja in zdravja državljanov.
While the use of thresholds may reduce red tape for smaller farmers, excluding farmers from cross-compliance checks is not only irregular, but may also adversely affect the achievement of the objectives of the Nitrates Directive. 
Uporaba pragov sicer lahko zmanjša upravno obremenitev malih kmetov, vendar izvzemanje kmetov iz pregledov navzkrižne skladnosti ni le nepravilno, temveč lahko tudi negativno vpliva na doseganje ciljev direktive o nitratih.
Figure 7.10 — Example of insufficient cross-compliance checks The Commission takes note of the Court’s finding. 
Slika 7.10 – Primer nezadostnih pregledov navzkrižne skladnosti Komisija je seznanjena z ugotovitvami Sodišča.
Although the Commission’s 2014 audit in Lithuania only covered animal-related SMRs, similar deficiencies were found in terms of sampling. 
Čeprav je revizija Komisije v Litvi leta 2014 obsegala le predpisane zahteve ravnanja, ki se nanašajo na rejo živali, so bile ugotovljene podobne pomanjkljivosti glede vzorčenja.
DG MARE and Member States systems related to the regularity of fisheries transactions 7.48. Managing authorities make payments to the beneficiaries, and declare the expenditure to the Commission, which then reimburses the Member States. 
Sistemi GD MARE in držav članic, povezani s pravilnostjo transakcij na področju ribištva 7.48 Organi upravljanja izvršujejo plačila upravičencem in odhodke prijavijo Komisiji, ki jih nato povrne državam članicam.
The Commission uses the annual control reports and the annual opinion of the audit authorities to assess whether the Member States have set up management and control systems that comply with the legal requirements. 
Komisija s pomočjo letnih poročil o nadzoru in letnih mnenj revizijskih organov oceni, ali so države članice vzpostavile upravljavske in kontrolne sisteme, ki so skladni s pravnimi zahtevami.
The Commission also carries out its own audits to verify that the systems function effectively. 
Izvaja tudi svoje revizije za preverjanje uspešnosti delovanja sistemov.
EN C 375/230 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 7.49. Our examination of systems in this area focused on audits carried out by the Commission (DG MARE). We carried out a desk review of a sample of five of the Commission's conformity audits. 
C 375/230 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 7.49 Naša preučitev sistemov na tem področju je bila osredotočena na revizije, ki jih je opravila Komisija (GD MARE). Sodišče je izvedlo pregled dokumentacije za vzorec petih revizij skladnosti, ki jih je opravila Komisija.