natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to simplify and improve the governance of the JTI/JUs, the Commission plans to introduce PPP-specific financial rules, including the possible establishment of common services/functions for JTI/JUs and the assignment to the executive directors of routine administrative, financial and management decisions in the regulation establishing the new generation of JTIs under Horizon 2020. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Za poenostavitev in izboljšanje upravljanja skupne tehnološke pobude/skupnih podjetij Komisija načrtuje uvedbo posebnih finančnih pravil za JZP, vključno z morebitno ustanovitvijo skupnih služb/funkcij za skupne tehnološke pobude/skupna podjetja ter zadolžitvijo izvršnih direktorjev za rutinske administrativne, finančne in upravne odločitve v okviru uredbe o novi generaciji tehnoloških pobud v okviru programa Obzorje 2020. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
Bearing in mind the public interest at stake, it is particularly difficult to decide which of these tasks can be removed without having an impact on the internal control and accountability framework of these entities. 
Ob upoštevanju javnih interesov se je zlasti težko odločiti, katere od teh nalog je mogoče odpraviti, ne da bi to vplivalo na notranje kontrole in okvir odgovornosti teh subjektov.
They are generally not full-time functions. 
Navadno to niso stalne funkcije.
The Commission plans to introduce PPP-specific financial rules on the basis of Article 209 of the Financial Regulation, including the possible establishment of common services/ functions for JTI/JUs, such as a shared internal audit function or a common accounting officer. 
Komisija načrtuje na podlagi člena 209 finančne uredbe uvedbo posebnih finančnih pravil za JZP, vključno z morebitno ustanovitvijo skupnih služb/funkcij za skupne tehnološke pobude/skupna podjetja, kot je skupni notranji revizor ali skupni računovodja.
Both of the issues raised are of concern to the Commission. 
Obe zastavljeni vprašanji zadevata Komisijo.
They will be addressed in Horizon 2020 bearing in mind the experience gained during this period and the constituent instruments of the JTIs under Horizon 2020, as well as in the model Financial Regulation for PPP bodies currently under preparation. 
Obravnavani bosta v okviru programa Obzorje 2020 ob upoštevanju pridobljenih izkušenj v tem obdobju, sestavnih instrumentov skupne tehnološke pobude v okviru programa Obzorje 2020 ter v vzorčni finančni uredbi za organe, pooblaščene za izvajanje JZP, ki je trenutno še v pripravi.
According to the provisions of Article 16 of the Council regulations (for all JTI JUs) setting up the joint undertakings, the Commission was responsible for the establishment and initial operation of the joint undertaking until the joint undertaking had the operational capacity to implement its own budget. 
V skladu z določbami člena 16 uredb Sveta (za vsa skupna podjetja za izvajanje skupne tehnološke pobude) o ustanovitvi skupnih podjetij je za vzpostavitev in začetno delovanje odgovorna Komisija, dokler skupno podjetje ne razvije poslovne sposobnosti za izvajanje lastnega proračuna.
The Commission agreed to each JTI JU's autonomy when each JU demonstrated that it had the operational capacity to implement its own budget. 
Komisija se je strinjala, da je vsako skupno podjetje za izvajanje skupne tehnološke pobude samostojno, ko pokaže, da je sposobno izvajati lasten proračun.
Before that, the activity of the joint undertakings was undertaken by the Commission, ensuring that the effect on research outcomes was minimised. 
Pred tem je dejavnost skupnih podjetij opravljala Komisija, ki je zagotovila, da je bil vpliv na rezultate raziskav čim manjši.
Moreover, the Commission considers that the 2 years that elapsed from the adoption of the JTI JU regulations until autonomy is comparable to the corresponding periods for other newly established EU bodies. 
Poleg tega Komisija meni, da sta dve leti od sprejetja uredb o skupnem podjetju za izvajanje skupne tehnološke pobude do samostojnosti takega podjetja primerljivi z ustreznimi obdobji za druge novoustanovljene organe EU.
The RSFF, notably the EU RSFF window through which RSFF loans of the EIB for riskier R & D investments are supported, has indeed enabled the EIB to finance investments of counterparts and/or projects well above its usually acceptable level of risk. 
Sklad za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja, zlasti mehanizem EU za Sklad, na osnovi katerega Sklad prejema posojila od EIB za podporo bolj tveganih naložb na področju raziskav in razvoja, je dejansko omogočil EIB, da financira naložbe drugih strani in/ali projektov, ki so daleč nad njeno običajno sprejemljivo stopnjo tveganja.
The purpose of the RSFF has thus been fully achieved. 
Namen Sklada je bil tako v celoti dosežen.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 96. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE 96.
The independent expert group, which conducted the RSFF interim evaluation in 2010, concluded, regarding the added value of the RSFF, that: ‘The RSFF helped many European research intensive firms to maintain RDI activities in a period of major financial stress, it has helped some of the most innovative firms in Europe to restructure their financial positions at a time banks and other financial institutions were reducing access to finance for high risk investments...’ 
Neodvisna skupina strokovnjakov, ki je izvedla vmesno oceno Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja v letu 2010, je v zvezi z njegovo dodano vrednostjo sklenila naslednje: „Sklad za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja je pomagal mnogim evropskim podjetjem z visoko stopnjo raziskav ohraniti dejavnosti RRI v obdobju velikih finančnih težav, pomagal je nekaj najbolj inovativnim podjetjem v Evropi pri prestrukturiranju njihovega finančnega položaja v času, ko so banke in druge finančne institucije omejevale dostop do finančnih sredstev za naložbe z visokim tveganjem (...).“ (vmesna ocena Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja iz avgusta 2010, stran 18).
It is not entirely surprising that entrepreneurs and businesses declared that a lower interest rate was a decisive factor in taking an RSFF loan, and the views of RSFF beneficiaries about their access to other debt finance must be treated with care as RSFF funds are commonly used along with debt finance from commercial sources. 
Ni ravno presenetljivo, da so podjetniki in podjetja izjavili, da je bila nižja obrestna mera odločilen dejavnik pri jemanju posojila Sklada, pri čemer je treba stališča upravičencev Sklada do drugih dolžniških financiranj obravnavati previdno, saj se sredstva Sklada običajno uporabljajo skupaj z dolžniškim financiranjem iz komercialnih virov.
In fact, RSFF loans are on average in the order of 30–35 % per project. 
Dejstvo je, da posojila Sklada v povprečju znašajo 30–35 % na projekt.
Other (commercial) banks or financial institutions are thus able to also provide finance to RSFF beneficiaries. 
Druge (komercialne) banke ali finančne institucije zato tudi lahko zagotovijo financiranje za upravičence Sklada.
In the Commission’s opinion, access to long-term loan finance for investments in risker R & D projects, at reasonable interest rates, is still a major barrier for private companies in many EU countries. 
Po mnenju Komisije je dostop do dolgoročnih finančnih posojil za naložbe za bolj tvegane projekte na področju raziskav in razvoja po razumnih obrestnih merah še vedno velika ovira za zasebna podjetja v številnih državah članicah EU.
The current relatively low default rate of RSFF loans might not reflect the real overall credit risk taken by the EIB, as defaults typically happen at a later stage of the investment and loan cycle. 
Trenutna sorazmerno nizka stopnja neplačevanja posojil Sklada morebiti ne kaže dejanskega splošnega kreditnega tveganja EIB, saj se običajno zamude zgodijo v kasnejši fazi naložbenega cikla in posojil.
It should furthermore be noted that the additionality of public support is a complex and multidimensional concept encompassing not only pure project additionality (whether the project would have been carried out in the absence of public support) but also scale, scope, acceleration, partner, output, etc. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Prav tako je treba omeniti, da je dodatnost javnega financiranja zapleten in večdimenzionalen koncept, ki presega zgolj dodatnost projekta (če bi bil projekt izveden brez javnega financiranja) ter zajema tudi obseg, področje uporabe, pospeševanje, partnerja, rezultat itd. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
75 Reply to paragraph 97 and Box 6 Through the fourth amendment of the RSFF cooperation agreement concluded on 5 December 2011, the risk-sharing between the EU and the EIB has indeed changed from a project-by-project approach to a portfolio-based approach, with first-loss-taking by the EU, up to certain thresholds. 
75 Odgovor na odstavek 97 in okvir 6 S četrto spremembo sporazuma o sodelovanju Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja, sprejeto 5. decembra 2011, se je delitev tveganj med EU in EIB dejansko spremenila s pristopa glede na posamezen projekt na pristop, ki temelji na portfelju, pri čemer ima do določenih pragov prvo izgubo EU.
For the EIB window, the risk remains entirely on the EIB balance sheet. 
Kar zadeva mehanizem EIB, ostaja tveganje izključno znotraj bilance stanja EIB.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 99. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 99.
The FP7 legal framework requires the Commission to ensure that all eligibility criteria are met — not only beneficiaries' practices — when considering the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. 
OP zahteva, da Komisija zagotovi, da so pri obravnavanju zakonitosti in pravilnosti povezanih transakcij izpolnjena vsa merila za upravičenost in ne samo prakse upravičencev.
However, in many cases, the usual accounting practices of beneficiaries contain costs that are not in compliance with other eligibility criteria (e.g. VAT, promotion and marketing costs, debt financing costs, etc.). 
Vendar pa so v mnogih primerih v običajne računovodske prakse upravičencev vključeni stroški, ki niso v skladu z drugimi merili za upravičenost, (npr. DDV, stroški predstavitvenih dejavnosti in trženja, stroški dolžniškega financiranja itd.).
For these reasons, they cannot be accepted. 
Zato jih zaradi navedenih razlogov ni mogoče sprejeti.
Where it has been possible, for example for average personnel costs, the Commission has aligned the rules to these practices. 
Kadar je to bilo mogoče, na primer glede povprečnih stroškov za zaposlene, je Komisija uskladila pravila s temi praksami.
However, in many cases it has not been possible to reconcile the aim to accept beneficiaries' practices with the legal rules. 
Vendar pa v številnih primerih cilja, da bi se sprejela praksa upravičencev, ni bilo mogoče uskladiti s pravnimi pravili.
The Commission accepts that this needs to be carefully examined in Horizon 2020 and the Commission's proposals already included, in the basic rules, some movement in this direction. 
Komisija se strinja, da je treba to natančno proučiti v okviru programa Obzorje 2020, pri čemer njeni predlogi v okviru osnovnih pravil že vključujejo določena prizadevanja v tej smeri.
Recommendation 1 — indents 1 to 3 The Commission will seek to reduce the requirements for certification, and look for ways to accept beneficiaries' practices, whilst noting the challenge of reducing requirements and maintaining respect of all the eligibility requirements. 
Priporočilo 1, odgovor na alinee 1–3 Komisija si bo prizadevala zmanjšati zahteve za potrditev in iskati načine, da sprejme prakse upravičencev, pri tem pa opozarja na izziv zmanjšanja zahtev in ohranjanje spoštovanja vseh zahtev glede upravičenosti.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Recommendation 1 — indent 4 The Commission notes that there are ‘national’, ‘regional’ and ‘beneficiary’ practices, and that thousands of different beneficiaries participate in the framework programme. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Priporočilo 1, odgovor na alineo 4 Komisija ugotavlja, da obstajajo „nacionalne“, „regionalne“ prakse in prakse „upravičencev“ ter da je na tisoče različnih upravičencev, ki sodelujejo v okvirnem programu.
To the extent that their practices meet all eligibility criteria, they will be accepted. 
Če njihove prakse izpolnjujejo vsa merila upravičenosti, bodo sprejete.
Recommendation 2 Since the very beginning of FP7, the Commission has been committed to ensuring good coordination between the different Commission services implementing the programme. 
Priporočilo 2 Komisija si je že od samega začetka 7. OP prizadevala zagotoviti dobro usklajenost med različnimi službami Komisije, ki izvajajo program.
These mechanisms include the Research Enquiry Service, interservice groups, and the Research Clearing Committee. 
Med te mehanizme spadajo Raziskovalno-informacijska služba, medresorske skupine in Odbor za raziskovalna vprašanja.
The fact that few cases arrive at the Research Clearing Committee shows that the other mechanisms that exist are effective in addressing and resolving most cases of incoherent treatment well before they arrive at the Research Clearing Committee. 
Dejstvo, da se Odboru predloži le malo primerov, kaže, da so drugi obstoječi mehanizmi učinkoviti pri obravnavanju in reševanju večine primerov nedoslednega obravnavanja, še preden so ti predloženi Odboru.
Nevertheless, the Commission will examine divergences and take appropriate action. 
Ne glede na to bo Komisija proučila odstopanja in ustrezno ukrepala.
Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
The Commission considers that its management of FP7 processes is by and large robust in key areas. 
Komisija meni, da je njeno upravljanje procesov 7. OP na ključnih področjih na splošno učinkovito.
The existing IT tools have allowed for the negotiation and signing of many thousands of grants, and the analysis and payment of many thousands of interim and final payments while at the same time harmonising and reducing time to grant. 
Obstoječa orodja IT so omogočila pogajanja in podpise več tisoč sporazumov o dodelitvi sredstev ter analizo in izvedbo več tisoč vmesnih in končnih plačil, hkrati pa so pripomogla k usklajevanju in skrajšanju časa do dodelitve.
These tools must therefore be efficient. 
Ta orodja so torej gotovo učinkovita.
The fact that time to grant has converged amongst the Commission services implementing FP7, and the fact that it has already been reduced to a level close to the target set in the new Financial Regulation and applicable to contracts resulting from future calls, is proof of the fact that the current IT tools and the current allocation of staff resources are effective. 
Dejstvo, da se čas do dodelitve med službami Komisije, ki izvajajo 7. OP, usklajuje in je že bil skrajšan do te mere, da je blizu ciljnega roka, določenega v novi finančni uredbi, pri čemer se uporablja za pogodbe, sklenjene na podlagi prihodnjih razpisov, je dokaz, da so sedanja orodja IT in razporeditev kadrovskih virov učinkoviti.
It should be noted, furthermore, that the Cooperation Specific Programme comprises different kinds of actions (collaborative research in different fields with, for instance, different ethical and security review requirements; joint programming; JTIs). 
Prav tako je treba omeniti, da posebni program „Sodelovanje“ zajema različne vrste dejavnosti (skupne raziskave na različnih področjih, za katera veljajo na primer različne zahteve po presoji etičnosti in varnosti, skupno načrtovanje programov in skupne tehnološke pobude).
The workload distribution calculations used by the Court in Table 3 therefore do not reflect the reality of all the activities undertaken by staff, and do not allow a fair comparison among the different research DGs and agencies. 
Zato izračuni porazdelitve delovne obremenitve, ki jih je Sodišče uporabilo v razpredelnici 3, ne kažejo dejanskega stanja glede vseh dejavnosti, ki jih izvaja osebje, ter ne omogočajo nepristranske primerjave med različnimi GD za raziskave in agencijami.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Recommendation 3 — First indent As set out above, the Commission considers that its IT tools are already quite effective as demonstrated by their capacity to handle large numbers of grants and payments and by the convergence of and decrease in time to grant. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Priporočilo 3, prva alinea Kot je navedeno zgoraj, Komisija meni, da so njena orodja IT že dokaj učinkovita, kot to dokazuje njihova zmogljivost obdelave velikega števila nepovratnih sredstev in plačil ter usklajevanje in skrajšanje časa do dodelitve.
FP7 electronic tools generally compare favourably with those of most national funding agencies visited. 
OP se na splošno lahko primerjajo z orodji večine obiskanih nacionalnih agencij za financiranje.
Further improvements are nevertheless planned under Horizon 2020. 
Kljub temu so načrtovane nadaljnje izboljšave v okviru programa Obzorje 2020.
The development of integrated tools is under way. 
Razvoj integriranih orodij je v teku.
This scenario will signal the end of the fragmentation described by the Court, and therefore an integrated IT system will be in place. 
To bo pomenilo konec razdrobljenosti, kot stanje opisuje Sodišče, saj bo vzpostavljen integriran sistem IT.
Recommendation 3 — Second indent The Commission agrees that the optimal allocation of staff resources constitutes a permanent challenge for any administration and will, in view of the new framework programme Horizon 2020, pay due attention to this issue. 
Priporočilo 3, druga alinea Komisija se strinja, da optimalna razporeditev kadrovskih virov pomeni nenehen izziv za vsako upravo, in bo temu vprašanju namenila ustrezno pozornost v okviru novega okvirnega programa Obzorje 2020.
The fact that time to grant has converged amongst the Commission services implementing FP7, and the fact that it has already been reduced to a level close to the target set in the new Financial Regulation and applicable to contracts resulting from future calls, is evidence of the fact that the current allocation of staff resources is effective. 
Dejstvo, da se čas do dodelitve med službami Komisije, ki izvajajo 7. OP, usklajuje in je že bil skrajšan do te mere, da je blizu ciljnega roka, določenega v novi finančni uredbi, pri čemer se uporablja za pogodbe, sklenjene na podlagi prihodnjih razpisov, je dokaz, da je sedanja razporeditev kadrovskih virov učinkovita.
It should be noted, furthermore, that the Cooperation Specific Programme comprises different kinds of actions (collaborative research in different fields with, for instance, different ethical and security review requirements; joint programming; JTIs) that do not allow for simple mechanical workload distribution calculations. 
Prav tako je treba omeniti, da posebni program „Sodelovanje“ zajema različne vrste dejavnosti (skupne raziskave na različnih področjih, za katera veljajo na primer različne zahteve po presoji etičnosti in varnosti, skupno načrtovanje programov, skupne tehnološke pobude), ki ne omogočajo enostavnih mehaničnih izračunov porazdelitve delovne obremenitve.
Time to grant has converged amongst the Commission services implementing FP7, and has already been reduced to a level close to the deadline set in the new Financial Regulation applicable to contracts resulting from future calls (270 days). 
OP, se usklajuje in je že bil skrajšan do te mere, da je blizu roka, določenega v novi finančni uredbi, pri čemer se uporablja za pogodbe, sklenjene na podlagi prihodnjih razpisov (270 dni).
For instance, LERU, a key stakeholder, has observed that strict deadlines would be very burdensome and could lead to very disadvantageous grant agreements. 
LERU, ki je ključna zainteresirana stran, na primer ugotavlja, da bi bili strogi roki zelo obremenjujoči in bi lahko privedli do zelo neugodnih sporazumov o dodelitvi sredstev.
77 Recommendation 4 The Commission will be improving automation for Horizon 2020, and is working on harmonising business processes. 
77 Priporočilo 4 Komisija izboljšuje avtomatizacijo za program Obzorje 2020 in si prizadeva za uskladitev poslovnih procesov.
However, the Commission also underlines the reduction in processing times, and the increasing convergence in processing times between services, already achieved in FP7. 
Vendar pa Komisija tudi poudarja, da so bili skrajšanje časa obdelave in večje uskladitve časa obdelave med službami že doseženi v 7.
This indicates that identical distribution of responsibilities is not necessary to bring about improvements. 
To kaže, da enaka razdelitev pristojnosti ni potrebna za doseganje izboljšav.
Time to grant has converged amongst most of the Commission services implementing FP7, and has already been reduced to a level close to the deadline set in the new Financial Regulation applicable to contracts resulting from future calls (270 days). 
OP, se usklajuje in je že bil skrajšan do te mere, da je blizu roka, določenega v novi finančni uredbi, pri čemer se uporablja za pogodbe, sklenjene na podlagi prihodnjih razpisov (270 dni).
This has been due to better guidance, sharing of best practices and closer monitoring. 
To je bilo doseženo z boljšim vodstvom, izmenjavo najboljših praks in okrepljenim spremljanjem.
The above shows that automation and consistent implementation are important but not critical for reducing time to grant. 
Iz navedenega je razvidno, da sta avtomatizacija in dosledno izvajanje pomembna, vendar ne bistvena za skrajšanje časa do dodelitve.
The Commission considers that the tool for expert selection is adequate for the purposes for which it has been created. 
Komisija meni, da orodje za izbiro strokovnjakov ustreza namenu, za katerega je bilo oblikovano.
Recommendation 5 The Commission shares the view that its control activities could be more risk-driven. 
Priporočilo 5 Komisija se strinja z mnenjem, da bi njene nadzorne dejavnosti lahko bolj temeljile na tveganju.
The Commission agrees that in this context, the focus in ex ante controls should be on beneficiaries marked by higher risks. 
V zvezi s tem se Komisija strinja, da bi se bilo treba v okviru predhodnih kontrol osredotočiti na upravičence, ki pomenijo večje tveganje.
As regards ex post controls, the architecture is a logical consequence of the need to dispose a representative sample for estimating a most likely error rate. 
Glede naknadne kontrole je arhitektura razumljiva posledica potrebe po razpolaganju z reprezentativnim vzorcem za ocenjevanje najverjetnejše stopnje napake.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Notwithstanding these constraints, the ex post control strategy already today foresees risk-based audits. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Ne glede na te omejitve so v strategiji naknadne kontrole že sedaj predvidene revizije, ki temeljijo na tveganju.
As regards the Court's last point, on the extension of the single sample, the audit strategy is already coordinated. 
Kar zadeva zadnjo točko Sodišča glede razširitve enotnega vzorca, je revizijska strategija že usklajena.