natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Audited project 3 (CPMA) Fitting of District Heating Substations in Visaginas Housing Areas 1 and 2+3: transformation of the district heating system of Visaginas town from ‘open-type’ to ‘closed-type’, in order to improve its efficiency and security of heat supply after the final shutdown of Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant. 
3 (Centralna agencija za vodenje projektov) Izgradnja toplotnih postaj daljinskega ogrevanja v stanovanjskih območjih 1 in 2+3 v mestu Visaginas: preoblikovanje sistema za daljinsko ogrevanje mesta Visaginas iz sistema „odprtega tipa“ v sistem„zaprtega tipa“ za izboljšanje njegove učinkovitosti in zanesljivosti oskrbe s toploto po dokončnem zaprtju jedrske elektrarne Ignalina.
The audit observed significant delays in the implementation of this project. 
Pri reviziji so bile opažene precejšnje zamude pri izvajanju tega pro­ jekta.
The second phase, in particular, concerning Visaginas’ second and third housing areas, has accumulated a delay of nearly 18 months compared to its implementation plan, so that CPMA considered terminating the project in its present form. 
Zlasti druga faza, ki se nanaša na drugo in tretje stanovanjsko območje mesta Visaginas, zamuja skoraj 18 mesecev glede na načrt izvajanja, tako da je Centralna agencija za vodenje projektov razmišljala o zaustavitvi projekta v njegovi sedanji obliki.
Audited project 4 (CPMA) Contribution to the Housing and Urban Development Agency’s mechanism to support energy efficiency upgrading of multi-apartment residential buildings. 
4 (Centralna agencija za vodenje projektov) Prispevek instrumentu Agencije za stanovanja in razvoj mest v pod­ poro izboljšanju energetske učinkovitosti večstanovanjskih stavb.
The on-the-spot visits confirmed the positive results reported by the Agency: heat energy savings between 30 % and 60 % of original consumption were realised for the co-financed projects. 
Ogledi na kraju samem so potrdili pozitivne rezultate, o katerih je poročala Agencija za stanovanja in razvoj mest: v okviru sofinan­ ciranih projektov je bilo doseženo zmanjšanje potreb po toploti za med 30 % in 60 %.
However, the limited share of the EU contribution allocated to the scheme through the CPMA channel within the overall mechanism (180 multifamily blocks, compared to the target population of 24 000 residential buildings) reduced the significance of these positive results. Special Report No 16/2011 – EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and Future Challenges 
Vendar pa je bil pomen teh pozitivnih rezultatov zmanjšan zaradi omejenega deleža prispevka EU, dodeljenega instrumentu Agencije za stanovanja in razvoj mest prek Centralne agencije za vodenje projektov, v celotnem instrumentu (180 večdružinskih blokov v primerjavi s ciljno skupino 24 000 stanovanjskih stavb). Posebno poročilo št. 16/2011 – Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi
ANNEX IV 37 NPP Project Court’s assessment Kozloduy Audited project 5 Bulgaria Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Credit Line Facility: the establishment of a credit facility intended to finance private sector companies for industrial energy efficiency and small renewable energy projects. 
5 Posojilni instrument za energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije v Bolgariji: oblikovanje posojilnega instrumenta, ki je namenjen financiranju podjetij v zasebnem sektorju za projekte energetske učinkovitosti v industriji in manjše projekte obnovljivih virov energije.
The credit line facility has delivered results in line with the objectives set, contributing to the mitigation of the early agreed closure of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant units 1 to 4. 
Rezultati posojilnega instrumenta so v skladu z zastavljenimi cilji in prispevajo k blaženju posledic dogovorjenega predčasnega zaprtja enot 1 do 4 jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj.
However, the necessity of allocating further KIDSF funding to the facility is not fully justified, since funded sub-projects show economic viability and other European programmes address similar objectives. 
Vendar potreba po dodelitvi dodatnih sredstev iz sklada KIDSF temu instrumentu ni povsem upravičena, saj so financirani podprojekti videti ekonomsko upravičeni, podobnih ciljev pa se lotevajo tudi drugi evropski programi.
Relevant public authorities in Bulgaria are not involved in the management of the facility. 
Pristojni javni organi v Bolgariji v vodenje tega instrumenta niso vključeni.
The full externalisation of the project management limits the coordination of measures undertaken within the credit line facility with those implemented in the context of other national or European programmes. 
Zaradi povsem zunanjega izvajanja vodenja projekta je usklajevanje ukrepov, sprejetih v okviru posojilnega instrumenta, in ukrepov, izvajanih v okviru drugih nacionalnih ali evropskih programov, omejeno.
Audited project 6 Demand Side Energy Efficiency Measures in Public Buildings: upgrading of the energy efficiency of public buildings (hospitals, schools and other). 
6 Ukrepi energetske učinkovitosti v javnih zgradbah za zmanjšanje povpraševanja: izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti javnih zgradb (bolnišnic, šol in drugih).
The project has delivered results contributing to the mitigation of the consequences of the early closure of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant reactors 1 to 4. 
Rezultati projekta so prispevali k blaženju posledic predčasne zaustavitve reaktorjev 1 do 4 jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj.
However, the existence of other national and European programmes addressing the same objectives questions the necessity of KIDSF funding for improving the energy efficiency in public buildings. Special Report No 16/2011 – EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and Future Challenges 
Vendar obstoj drugih nacionalnih in evropskih programov, ki se nanašajo na iste cilje, postavlja potrebo po financiranju boljše ener­ getske učinkovitosti v javnih zgradbah iz sklada KIDSF pod vprašaj. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2011 – Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi
38 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. With the overall goal of improving nuclear safety, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia agreed to shut down eight reactors in their EU accession treaties. 
38 POVZETEK I. Ob splošnem cilju izboljšanja jedrske varnosti so Bolgarija, Litva in Slovaška v svojih pogodbah o pristopu k EU soglašale, da zaustavijo osem reaktorjev.
These Treaties were ratified by all Member States. 
Te pogodbe so ratificirale vse države članice.
Without the EU funds provided for decommissioning and mitigation this would not have happened, particularly given the concerted political pressure in these three Member States, which reached its peak during the severe gas supply crisis in early 2009. 
Brez sredstev EU, zagotovljenih za razgradnjo reaktorjev in blaženje posledic njihove ustavitve, se to ne bi zgodilo, zlasti glede na usklajen politični pritisk v teh treh državah članicah, ki je dosegel vrhunec v času hude krize oskrbe s plinom na začetku leta 2009.
III. (a) The Accession Treaties set the policy framework for the EU’s financial support without quantifying the expected achievements. 
III. (a) Pristopne pogodbe so določile okvir politike za finančno pomoč EU brez količinske opredelitve pričakovanih dosežkov.
The amounts fixed for this assistance were the outcome of political negotiations, which recognised the extraordinary burden placed on the Member States by the shutdown commitments. 
Zneski, določeni za to pomoč, so rezultat političnih pogajanj, ki priznavajo izjemno breme, naloženo državam članicam z zavezami za zaustavitev.
As such the amounts were not a specific proportion of the estimated costs, but rather an expression of solidarity between the EU and the concerned Member States. 
Zneski sami niso bili poseben delež ocenjenih stroškov, ampak bolj izraz solidarnosti med EU in zadevnimi državami članicami.
In the intervening years the Commission has put in place a procedural framework that sets specific objectives, defines roles and responsibilities and clearly defines the reporting and supervision requirements. 
Komisija je medtem uvedla postopkovni okvir, ki določa posebne cilje, opredeljuje vloge in odgovornosti ter jasno določa zahteve glede poročanja in nadzora.
This framework allows the Commission to have a clear picture of the programme’s achievements in all three Member States. 
Ta okvir omogoča Komisiji pridobiti jasno predstavo o dosežkih programa v vseh treh državah članicah.
The Commission considers that the programmes have been successful in reaching the overall goal of significantly improving nuclear safety as well as helping Member States mitigate the effects of early closure. 
Komisija meni, da so bili programi uspešni pri doseganju splošnega cilja znatnega izboljšanja jedrske varnosti, pa tudi pri pomoči državam članicam, da bi ublažile učinke predčasnega zaprtja.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION The Commission intends to further define specific objectives, priorities and results to be obtained when making its legislative proposal for EU support under the next multiannual financial framework. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Komisija namerava podrobneje opredeliti posebne cilje, prednostne naloge in rezultate, ki jih je treba doseči, ko bo pripravljala zakonodajni predlog za pomoč EU v okviru naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira.
This proposal will take into account that all eight nuclear power plants have been closed, stayed closed and dismantling has started and the impacts of early closure have been mitigated through replacement of capacity and energy efficiency measures. 
Ta predlog bo upošteval, da je bilo zaprtih vseh osem jedrskih elektrarn, da so ostale zaprte in se je začelo razstavljanje ter da so se učinki predčasnega zaprtja ublažili z nadomestno zmogljivostjo in ukrepi za energetsko učinkovitost.
III. (b) In July 2011, the Commission reported to the Council and the European Parliament1 on the progress of the three decommissioning programmes. 
III. (b) Komisija je julija 2011 poročala Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu1 o napredku treh programov razgradnje.
This report and the accompanying Commission staff working document contain detailed information on the use of financial resources, which was made available in the context described under III(a). 
To poročilo in spremljajoči delovni dokument služb Komisije vsebujeta podrobne informacije o uporabi finančnih sredstev, ki so bila dana na voljo v razmerah, opisanih v točki III(a).
Delays and cost overruns are not unusual given that projects financed by the programmes are often long, complex and politically sensitive. 
Zamude in prekoračitve stroškov niso nena-vadne, glede na to da so projekti, ki se financirajo s programi, pogosto dolgi, zapleteni in politično občutljivi.
III. (c) For nuclear safety and licensing reasons, the organisational changes, which are the clear responsibility of the nuclear power plant operators and not the primary objective of the EU financing programmes, can only start once the last reactor unit has been shut down. 
III. (c) Zaradi jedrske varnosti in izdajanja dovoljenj se lahko organizacijske spremembe, ki so nedvomno v pristojnosti upravljavcev jedrskih elektrarn in niso primarni cilj programov financiranja EU, začnejo šele potem, ko je zaustavljena zadnja reaktorska enota.
1 COM (2011) 432 report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council On the use of financial resources during 2004–09 provided to Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria to support the decommissioning of early shut-down nuclear power-plants under the Acts of Accession and SEC (2011) 914 Commission staff working paper ‘Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme data’. Special Report No 16/2011 – EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and Future Challenges 
1 COM(2011) 432 Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi finančnih sredstev v letih od 2004 do 2009, dodeljenih Litvi, Slovaški in Bolgariji za pomoč pri razgradnji predčasno zaustavljenih jedrskih elektrarn v skladu z akti o pristopu, in SEC(2011) 914 Delovni dokument služb Komisije o programu pomoči za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2011 – Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi
39 III. (d) The ultimate responsibility for decommissioning and its financing lies with the Member State in which the nuclear power plant is situated. 
39 III. (d) Končno odgovornost za razgradnjo in njeno financiranje imajo države članice, v katerih so jedrske elektrarne.
It is not for the EU to make up any funding shortfall. 
EU ni dolžna nadomestiti morebitnega primanjkljaja sredstev.
Nevertheless, acknowledging the historical circumstances further EU financial contributions for the period 2014–20 are currently under discussion in the Council and European Parliament following the Commission’s recent Communication ‘A budget for Europe 2020’. 
Kljub temu ob priznavanju zgodovinskih okoliščin zdaj v Svetu in Evropskem parlamentu potekajo razprave o nadaljnjem finančnem prispevku EU za obdobje 2014– 2020, ki sledijo nedavnemu sporočilu Komisije „Proračun za Evropo 2020“.
However, EU support will be conditional on the concerned Member States committing adequate additional resources. 
Vendar bo pogoj za pomoč EU ta, da zadevne države članice zagotovijo ustrezna dodatna sredstva.
Under normal circumstances, operators should ensure the financing of the decommissioning process; however, in line with its Recommendation 2006/851/Euratom, the Commission considers that, given their historical legacy from the communist period up to 1989, the EU support for decommissioning in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia is justifiable for historical reasons. 
V normalnih razmerah morajo upravljavci zagotoviti financiranje razgradnje, vendar Komisija v skladu s svojim priporočilom 2006/851/Euratom meni, da je glede na zgodovinsko zapuščino komunističnega obdobja do leta 1989, pomoč EU za razgradnjo v Bolgariji, Litvi in Slovaški upravičena iz zgodovinskih razlogov.
This is in accordance with the recently adopted Waste Directive (OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 
To je v skladu z nedavno sprejeto direktivo o odpadkih (UL L 199, 2.8.2011, str.
The closure commitment was then enshrined in the Accession Treaties and ratified by all 27 Member States. 
Zaveza o zaprtju je bila nato vključena v pristopnih pogodbah in jo je potrdilo vseh 27 držav članic.
While the financial contribution did have the objectives of decommissioning and mitigation measures, they have to be seen in the context of the EU’s overall objective in the nuclear field, which is to maximise nuclear safety. 
Čeprav je bil finančni prispevek namenjen ukrepom za razgradnjo in blaženje posledic, je treba upoštevati tudi splošni cilj EU na jedrskem področju, ki je zagotoviti največjo možno jedrsko varnost.
This contribution was intended as an expression of solidarity between the EU and the concerned Member States and was not based on a specific proportion of estimated costs. 
Ta prispevek je bil mišljen kot izraz solidarnosti med EU in zadevnimi državami članicami ter ni temeljil na posebnem deležu ocenjenih stroškov.
The Accession Treaties provide the framework for the funding scheme. 
Pristopne pogodbe zagotavljajo okvir za shemo financiranja.
The detailed discussions during the accession negotiations were the basis for the funding scheme put forward by the Commission. 
Podrobne razprave med pogajanji o pristopu so bile podlaga za temeljno shemo, ki jo je predlagala Komisija.
In the particular case of extending support for Bulgaria to the period 2010–13, the Commission re-examined the justification for such additional financial assistance (SEC(2009) 1431 final). 
V posebnem primeru podaljšanja pomoči Bolgariji na obdobje 2010–2013 je Komisija ponovno preučila utemeljitev za tako dodatno finančno pomoč (SEC(2009) 1431 konč.).
The three beneficiary countries contribute with their own financial resources to decommissioning the nuclear power plants as well as to mitigating measures in the energy sector. 
Tri države upravičenke prispevajo lastna finančna sredstva za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn, pa tudi za ukrepe za blaženje posledic v sektorju energije.
As such, co-financing has been an established practice since the pre-accession period. 
Tako sofinanciranje je uveljavljena praksa že od predpristopnega obdobja.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION OBSERVATIONS 18. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE OPAŽANJA 18.
Although recognising that the decommissioning process is not yet complete, the Commission would like to point out a number of major achievements. 
Komisija se zaveda, da razgradnja še ni končana, vendar želi izpostaviti številne pomembne dosežke.
There have been several years of safe maintenance of the closed reactor units pending complete removal from reactor cores. 
Pred popolno odstranitvijo sredic reaktorja so se zaprte reaktorske enote več let varno vzdrževale.
There has been the complete defuelling of Bohunice reactors 1 and 2 and Kozloduy 1 and 2 and the core of Ignalina 1. 
Reaktorja 1 in 2 v jedrski elektrarni Bohunice ter 1 in 2 v jedrski elektrarni Kozloduj in sredica reaktorja v jedrski elektrarni Ignalina 1 so bili popolnoma izpraznjeni.
Decommissioning strategies were revised and updated in Bulgaria and Slovakia. 
V Bolgariji in na Slovaškem sta bili strategiji razgradnje revidirani in posodobljeni.
Bohunice has the basic waste management infrastructure in place and obtained the decommissioning licence for phase 1. 
V jedrski elektrarni Bohunice je vzpostavljena infrastruktura za ravnanje z odpadki, elektrarna pa je pridobila tudi dovoljenje za 1. fazo razgradnje.
In Bulgaria the dry spent fuel storage facility has been built, as well as the design and supply of main equipment for the first phase of decommissioning. 
V Bolgariji je bilo zgrajeno skladišče za suho izrabljeno gorivo, prav tako pa je bila zasnovana in nabavljena glavna oprema za prvo fazo razgradnje.
In Lithuania some of the major waste storage infrastructure buildings are close to completion and the free-release measurement facility completed. 
V Litvi bo kmalu končanih nekaj glavnih infrastrukturnih objektov za odlaganje odpadkov in dokončana je bila naprava za merjenje sproščanja radioaktivnih snovi v okolje.
The dismantling has started at all three sites. 
Razstavljanje se je začelo na vseh treh lokacijah.
Certain information having a significant impact on the decommissioning planning will only become available as work progresses. 
Nekatere informacije, ki imajo pomemben vpliv na načrtovanje razgradnje, bodo na voljo šele med izvajanjem.
For example, planning for dismantling the reactor core can only be finalised in the decommissioning plan once the reactor has been shut down and a detailed radiological characterisation carried out. 
Tako se na primer načrtovanje za razstavljanje sredice reaktorja v načrtu za razgradnjo dokončno določi šele potem, ko je reaktor ustavljen in je izvedena podrobna radiološka opredelitev.
This type of iterative process (also known as a graduated approach in IAEA safety standards) is standard practice in the sector and is recognised as an efficient approach to decommissioning. 
Ta vrsta iterativnega procesa (ki je v varnostnih standardih MAAE znana tudi kot postopni pristop) je standardna praksa v sektorju in priznana kot učinkovit pristop k razstavljanju.
20. (a) Given the iterative nature of decommissioning planning outlined above (paragraph 19), the completion of the waste inventories depends on further detailed radiological characterisation. 
20. (a) Glede na zgoraj opisano iterativno naravo načrtovanja razgradnje (odstavek 19) je dokončanje popisa odpadkov odvisno od nadaljnje podrobne radiološke opredelitve.
The data available were sufficient for defining the waste infrastructure, taking into account that, in principle, the final disposal of spent fuels and nuclear waste is outside the scope of the programme. Special Report No 16/2011 – EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and Future Challenges 
Razpoložljivi podatki zadoščajo za opredelitev infrastrukture za odpadke, ob upoštevanju, da končno odlaganje izrabljenega goriva in jedrskih odpadkov načeloma ne spada na področje uporabe programa. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2011 – Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi
41 20. (b) Waste management plans exist for all eight reactors. 
41 20. (b) Načrti za ravnanje z odpadki obstajajo za vseh osem reaktorjev.
For example, some activities to dismantle the reactor core can only be performed after defuelling. 
Nekatere dejavnosti za razstavljanje sredice reaktorja se lahko izvedejo na primer šele po izpraznitvi reaktorja.
The data for Bohunice V1 were of the quality required to obtain the phase 1 nuclear decommissioning licence from the nuclear regulator after first having obtained a positive opinion from the Commission, as required under the Euratom Treaty. 
Kakovost podatkov za Bohunice V1 je ustrezala zahtevam za pridobitev dovoljenja jedrskega upravnega organa za 1. fazo razgradnje jedrske elektrarne, potem ko je bilo pridobljeno pozitivno mnenje Komisije, kot zahteva Pogodba Euratom.
20. (c) Estimating decommissioning costs in detail is an iterative process. 
20. (c) Podrobno ocenjevanje stroškov razgradnje je iterativen proces.
Some costs can only be estimated accurately once the corresponding activity has been designed. 
Nekateri stroški se lahko natančno ocenijo šele potem, ko je zasnovana ustrezna dejavnost.
20. (d) The EU is currently financing tools and databases for a monitoring system. 
20. (d) EU zdaj financira orodja in podatkovne zbirke za sistem spremljanja.
Monitoring structures (meetings, reporting) are in place at each of the nuclear power plants. 
V vsaki od navedenih jedrskih elektrarn so vzpostavljene strukture za spremljanje (sestanki, poročanje).
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Box 1 The plasma melting technology was the market response to the procurement process and was approved by the relevant safety authorities. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Okvir 1 Tehnologija taljenja s plazmo je bila tržni odziv na postopek javnih naročil, odobrili pa so jo ustrezni organi za varnost.
The project is co-financed from national resources. 
Projekt se sofinancira iz nacionalnih sredstev.
Plasma melting technology can potentially serve many more purposes than traditional technologies. 
Tehnologija taljenja s plazmo se lahko potencialno uporablja za veliko več namenov kot tradicionalne tehnologije.
The Accession Treaties or subsequent regulations identified the need for mitigating measures. 
Pristopne pogodbe ali poznejši predpisi so določili potrebe po ukrepih za blaženje posledic.
The EU support scheme is designed to ensure that the measures proposed by the Member State are in accordance with and based on their national energy strategies, which inevitably consider the impact of the nuclear plants’ closure. 
Shema pomoči EU je namenjena zagotavljanju, da bodo ukrepi, ki jih predlaga država članica, v skladu z nacionalnimi energetskimi strategijami, ki morajo nujno upoštevati vpliv zaprtja jedrskih elektrarn.
Moreover, for Bulgaria, the Commission is aware that the assessment was outdated and no longer relevant. 
Poleg tega se Komisija zaveda, da je ocena za Bolgarijo zastarela in ni več ustrezna.
The EU therefore made its continued financing of mitigating measures for the period 2010–13 conditional on Bulgaria providing evidence that projects proposed are integral to their national energy strategy and consequential to the closure of Kozloduy. 
Zato je EU za nadaljnje financiranje ukrepov za blažitev posledic za obdobje 2010–2013 postavila pogoj, da so predlagani projekti sestavni del nacionalne energetske strategije in da je posledično treba zapreti jedrsko elektrarno Kozloduj.
For Kozloduy, the EBRD’s assessment indicated that around 500 MW of production capacity would be compensated. 
V zvezi z jedrsko elektrarno Kozloduj je ocena EBRD pokazala, da bi se nadomestilo okrog 500 MW proizvodne zmogljivosti.