natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The standard rate card did not include price references for all categories of animals and had no upper limits. 
Ta standardna tabela cen ni vsebovala niti referenčnih cen za vse kategorije živali niti zgornje meje.
After a very strong rise in valuation figures use of the standard rate card was abandoned. 
Zaradi velikega povišanja ocenjenih zneskov je bila uporaba standardne tabele opuščena.
Valuers were not given precise guidelines, and instructions on including outstanding animal premiums in the compensation figure were imprecise, leading to variations in the practices followed. 
Ocenjevalci niso dobili natančnih smernic, nenatančna navodila glede vključitve še vedno dolgovanih premij za živali v znesek nadomestila pa so povzročila razlike v praksah.
In Ireland the responsible authority produced a monthly list of precise prices for all categories of cattle. 
Pristojni organ na Irskem je pripravljal mesečni seznam natančnih cen za vse kategorije goveda.
In the case of sheep, on the other hand, the price grid established by the responsible authority was incomplete and provided no upper limits. 
Nasprotno je bila tabela cen za ovce, ki jo je pripravil pristojni organ, nepopolna in ni predvidevala zgornje meje.
In the Netherlands the reference price grid was set in advance by the responsible authority and the valuation procedures to be followed had already been laid down in the contingency plan. This was a contributory factor in achieving more precise and uniform assessments of animal value. 
Na Nizozemskem so referenčna tabela cen, ki jo je pristojni organ določil vnaprej, in postopki ocenjevanja, ki so bili že predvideni v načrtu za ukrepe ob nepredvidljivih dogodkih in po katerih se je treba ravnati, prispevali k natančnejši in enotnejši oceni vrednosti živali.
In France a flat-rate scale had been set for sheep, but for other categories of animal the inadequacy of the national framework allowed prefectures to opt for various systems. 
V Franciji je bila določena pavšalna lestvica za ovce, vendar je nezadosten nacionalni okvir za druge kategorije živali omogočil, da so se prefekture odločile za različne sisteme.
(73) The cattle registration and identification system comprises ear tags and passports identifying cattle individually, individual registers kept on every farm, and computer databases set up by the Member States. 
(73) Sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda vključuje ušesne znamke in potne liste za individualno identifikacijo goveda, individualne registre na vsakem gospodarstvu in računalniške podatkovne baze, uvedene v državah članicah.
The database must provide at any time the identity numbers of all the cattle present on a holding, together with all movements of all cattle from birth. 
Podatkovna baza mora ves čas nuditi identifikacijske številke vsega goveda na gospodarstvu ter vse premike vsega goveda od skotitve dalje.
Despite the weaknesses detected in the application of the system (see Special Report No 6/2004 on the cattle identification and registration system), it would have been possible for lists of cattle present on farms to be printed and used by vets and valuers to verify animalsŐ history, slaughter them and establish their value. 
Kljub pomanjkljivostim, ugotovljenim pri uporabi tega sistema (glej Posebno poročilo št. 6/2004 o sistemu identifikacije in registracije), bi lahko natisnili sezname goveda na gospodarstvih, ki bi jih veterinarji in ocenjevalci uporabili, da bi preverili število živali, začeli njihov zakol in ocenili njihovo vrednost.
In the absence of detailed Community regulations the systems introduced in the Member States resulted in lack of uniformity in the compensation to farmers. 
Zaradi odsotnosti natančnih predpisov Skupnosti so bila po sistemih, vzpostavljenih v državah članicah, rejcem izplačana neenotna nadomestila.
In the United Kingdom the NAO, like the Commission and the Court, detected animal values that were higher than the values at the beginning of the crisis. 
Nacionalni revizijski urad (National Audit Office) ter Komisija in Sodišče so v Združenem kraljestvu ugotovili višje ocene vrednosti živali v primerjavi z njihovo vrednostjo na začetku krize.
Additional payments totalling 4,2 million euro relative to the initial valuation of the animals were granted to some farmers (France, Ireland, United Kingdom). 
Nekaterim rejcem so bila odobrena dodatna plačila v skupni vrednosti 4,2 milijona EUR glede na začetno vrednost njihovih živali (Francija, Irska, Združeno kraljestvo).
In other cases the compensation was reduced (Netherlands). 
V drugih primerih so se nadomestila zmanjšala (Nizozemska).
The average compensation paid to farmers was noticeably higher in the United Kingdom for cattle and sheep than in the other Member States, while in France it was higher for pigs (see Box 6 and Diagram 3). 
Povprečna nadomestila, izplačana rejcem, so bila za govedo in ovce precej višja v Združenem kraljestvu kot v drugih državah članicah, medtem ko so bila za prašiče višja v Franciji (glej okvir 6 in graf 3).
Box 6 Compensation paid by Member States In the United Kingdom the compensation paid was high: the National Audit Office reported that the standard rate card used to value animals during part of the crisis was based on the highest prices prevailing just before the crisis. 
Okvir 6 Nadomestila, ki so jih izplačale države članice V Združenem kraljestvu so bila izplačana nadomestila visoka: Nacionalni revizijski urad (National Audit Office) je ugotovil, da je standardna tabela cen, ki se je med delom krize uporabljala za ocenjevanje živali, temeljila na najvišjih cenah, ki so veljale tik pred krizo.
The contracts that were concluded with the valuers tied their remuneration to the estimated value of the animals, with the inherent risk that the estimated value (and, therefore, the compensation paid) would be unduly increased. 
Ker je bilo v pogodbi, sklenjeni z ocenjevalci, njihovo plačilo povezano z oceno vrednosti živali, je obstajalo tveganje, da bo ocenjena vrednost neupravičeno višja in zaradi tega višja tudi izplačana nadomestila.
The Commission has calculated that the average compensation paid for cattle was more than twice their value, more than 2,5 times value for sheep and almost twice value for pigs, resulting in an over-valuation (811,7 million euro) of the amount declared by the responsible authority. 
Komisija je izračunala, da je bilo nadomestilo za govedo v povprečju dvakrat višje od njegove vrednosti, za ovce več kot dvakrat in pol ter za prašiče skoraj dvakrat, zaradi česar je bil znesek, ki ga je prijavil pristojni organ, precenjen za 811,7 milijona EUR.
In the case of France the Commission estimated that 1,1 million euro of the amount declared was attributable to the over-valuation of animals, mainly because the compensation included indirect losses and the valuations for pigs were too high. 
Komisija je v primeru Francije ocenila, da je previsoka ocena vrednosti živali, predvsem zaradi vključitve izgub iz poslovanja v nadomestilo in odobrene previsoke vrednosti prašičev, znašala 1,1 milijona EUR.
In Ireland and the United Kingdom additional amounts (0,5 million euro and 1,7 million euro respectively) were paid to farmers who disputed valuations, but the amount of compensation paid was not cut in cases where the responsible authority found the valuation too high. 
Dodatna plačila na Irskem (0,5 milijona EUR) in v Združenem kraljestvu (1,7 milijona EUR) so bila izplačana kmetom, ki so se pritožili, pri tem pa pristojni organ, ki so se mu ocene zdele previsoke, ni znižal izplačanih nadomestil.
In France the flat-rate scale for sheep was revised upwards, adding almost two million euro to the compensation for destroying carcasses. 
V Franciji so zvišali zneske na pavšalni lestvici za ovce, zaradi česar sta bila skupaj z nadomestilom za uničenje trupel dodatno izplačana 2 milijona EUR.
In the Netherlands the ministry decided to reduce the compensation for infected animals by 50 % of their value. 
Na Nizozemskem se je ministrstvo odločilo zmanjšati nadomestila za okužene živali za 50 % njihove vrednosti.
As a consequence farmers received 50 % of the value of infected animals and 100 % of the value of other animals, all on the same farm. 
Zaradi tega je rejec prejel nadomestilo za okužene živali v višini 50 % njihove vrednosti in za druge živali na isti kmetiji v višini 100 % njihove vrednosti.
A price grid was drawn up in advance and used as a valuation guide. 
Sestavljena je bila vnaprej določena tabela cen, na podlagi katere je bilo opravljeno ocenjevanje.
C 54/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union Diagram 3 Average compensation paid per head for different categories of animals slaughtered in 2001 3.3.2005 Exchange rate: 1 euro = 0,62380 pound sterling (on 3 December 2001) Source: FR/ Claims for reimbursement (5 October 2001 and 6 December 2002). 
C 54/20 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 3.3.2005 Graf 3 Povprečni zneski nadomestil na glavo za različne kategorije zaklanih živali, izplačani v letu 2001 Menjalni tečaj: 1 EUR = 0,62380 funta šterlinga (na dan 3. decembra 2001). Vir: Francija/zahtevka za povračilo (5. oktober 2001 in 6. december 2002).
IRL/ Claim for reimbursement (6 February 2002). 
Irska/zahtevek za povračilo (6. februar 2002).
NL/ Claim for reimbursement (April 2002). 
Nizozemska/zahtevek za povračilo (april 2002).
UK/ Claims for reimbursement (December 2001 and 26 February 2003) plus Northern Ireland claim for reimbursement. 
Združeno kraljestvo/zahtevka za povračilo (december 2001 in 26. februar 2003) in zahtevek za povračilo s strani Severne Irske.
Established cases of double payments of animal premiums 67. 
Ugotovljeni primeri dvojnih plačil premij za živali 67.
Five months after the start of the FMD crisis, when Member States had already begun to award compensation, the Commission drew up a regulation of derogation (74) concerning Member StatesŐ payment of the Community per capita animal and slaughter premiums under market support measures (75). 
Komisija je pet mesecev po začetku krize slinavke in parkljevke, ko so države članice že začele dodeljevati nadomestila, pripravila izredno uredbo (74) o premijah za živali in klavnih premijah Skupnosti, ki jih države članice plačujejo po glavi živine (75) v okviru ukrepov za podporo trga.
The Regulation authorised Member States to pay the premiums to farmers, in addition to the FMD compensation, without their having to comply with the conditions governing retention of animals on the farm which are necessary for control purposes under normal circumstances (identification and counting of the animals). 
Ta uredba je državam članicam dovolila, da so te premije rejcem izplačale poleg nadomestil za slinavko in parkljevko, ne da bi morali slednji izpolnjevati pogoje reje živali na gospodarstvih, potrebne za nadzor v normalnih okoliščinah (identifikacija in štetje živali).
(74) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2001 (OJ L 194,18.7.2001, p. 4). 
(74) Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1458/2001 (UL L 194, 18.7.2001, str.
This Regulation was drawn up by the Directorate-General for Agriculture. 
To uredbo je pripravil Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo.
However, when it drafted the derogation Regulation the Commission did not take into account the selling practices that normally apply, particularly in Ireland and the United Kingdom, whereby the sale price of animals includes the amount of any animal premiums still outstanding from which the next buyer might benefit. 
Vendar Komisija pri pripravi te izredne uredbe ni upoštevala prodajnih praks, veljavnih v normalnih okoliščinah, zlasti na Irskem in v Združenem kraljestvu, kjer v prodajno ceno živali vključijo znesek še dolgovanih premij za živali, ki bi jih prejel naslednji kupec.
In actual fact, valuers in Ireland and the United Kingdom followed the usual practice and, taking the view that adequate compensation for farmers ought to include any premiums still due to the farmers, they included them in the livestock valuations for FMD compensation purposes. 
Ocenjevalci na Irskem in v Združenem kraljestvu, ki so upoštevali običajne prodajne prakse in menili, da bi moralo „ustrezno nadomestilo“ za rejce upoštevati znesek premij, ki se še dolguje rejcem, so te premije vključili v ocene vrednosti živali, ki so se uporabile za izračun nadomestila za slinavko in parkljevko.
The Commission, however, omitted to take this practice into consideration and did not instruct Member States to refrain from paying animal premiums subsequently if they had already been included in the FMD compensation. 
Vendar Komisija, ker ni upoštevala teh praks, državam članicam ni prepovedala poznejšega izplačila premij za živali, kadar so bile že predhodno vključene v nadomestilo za slinavko in parkljevko.
After granting farmers FMD compensation the Member States applied the derogating Regulation and then proceeded to pay any animal premiums that were still due. 
Države članice so, potem ko so rejcem dodelile nadomestila za slinavko in parkljevko, ob uporabi izredne uredbe, izplačale še dolgovane premije za živali.
Given that Ireland and the United Kingdom had already included the amount of some of these premiums in the FMD compensation previously paid to farmers, this meant that some farmers were able to collect the amount of premium twice. 
Ker sta Irska in Združeno kraljestvo že vključila znesek nekaterih od teh premij v nadomestilo za slinavko in parkljevko, ki sta ga predhodno izplačala rejcem, je to pomenilo, da so nekateri od njih znesek premij lahko prejeli (75) Predpise o premijah za živali (Uredba Sveta (ES) št.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/21 70. 
3.3.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 54/21 70.
In practice the animal valuation forms only gave an overall amount, without distinguishing between the premiums and the intrinsic value of the animals, so that it was difficult for an auditor to set a precise figure on the extent of double payments. 
Ker je bil v praksi na ocenjevalnih obrazcih za živali naveden samo celotni znesek brez razlikovanja med premijami in pravo vrednostjo živali, so revizorji težko natančno ocenili obseg dvojnih plačil.
However, given that valuers had been instructed to include the amount of the premiums in the livestock valuations and that some of them had given direct confirmation of the inclusion, the Court was able to estimate that the total for animal premiums (76) paid to the United Kingdom in duplication of those included in the FMD compensation could be of the order of 10 million pounds sterling (more than 16 million euro) (77). 
Vendar je Sodišče na podlagi dejstva, da so ocenjevalci dobili navodilo, da vključijo znesek premij v oceno živali, in da so nekateri med njimi to vključitev neposredno potrdili, lahko ocenilo, da bi celotni znesek premij za živali (76), ki so bile izplačane Združenemu kraljestvu, skupaj s premijami, vključenimi v nadomestila za slinavko in parkljevko, lahko znašal 10 milijonov funtov šterlingov (več kot 16 milijonov EUR) (77).
In Ireland as well, the Court identified cattle premiums that had been paid in addition to compensation, but the amounts were smaller (78). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so bile na Irskem poleg nadomestil izplačane tudi premije za govedo, vendar so bili zneski manjši (78).
In France some prefectures included bovine premiums in the compensation, others did not. 
V Franciji so nekatere prefekture premije za govedo vključile v nadomestila, druge ne.
The agriculture ministry in the Netherlands, on the other hand, told the Court that it had not included any premiums in the FMD compensation. 
Nasprotno je nizozemsko ministrstvo za kmetijstvo povedalo Sodišču, da v nadomestila za slinavko in parkljevko ni vključilo nobene premije.
Still in the context of market support measures, provision for payment of a slaughtering premium for cattle is included in a Council Regulation (79) requiring an abattoir certificate to confirm that the animal has been slaughtered. 
Neenotno izplačevanje klavnih premij 72. Uredba Sveta (79) prav tako v okviru ukrepov za podporo trga predvideva izplačilo premije za zakol goveda in zahteva potrdilo klavnice o zakolu živali.
This Regulation, however, does not specify the nature of the slaughtering, i.e. whether it is for purposes of human consumption (EAGGF Guarantee Section - market support) or on health grounds (EAGGF Guarantee Section - veterinary). 
Vendar ta uredba ne določa natančno narave zakola, in sicer ali gre za zakol za prehrano ljudi (Jamstveni oddelek EKUJS – podpora trga) ali zaradi zdravstvenih razlogov (Jamstveni sklad EKUJS – veterinarstvo).
Depending on the interpretation it was possible for the slaughter premium to be paid in addition to the FMD compensation, but only to a small minority of farmers whose contaminated animals were slaughtered at an abattoir. 
Glede na razlago je mogoče klavno premijo izplačati poleg nadomestila za slinavko in parkljevko, vendar samo majhnemu številu rejcev, katerih kontaminirane živali so bile zaklane v klavnici.
This led to inequality in the treatment of farmers within Member States, according to where slaughter took place. 
Zaradi tega je v državah članicah prišlo do neenake obravnave rejcev glede na kraj, na katerem so bile živali zaklane.
When questioned on the subject by one of the Member States the Commission did not resolve the matter, and did not give a reply on the interpretation to be adopted before the deadline of 30 June 2002 set by the regulations for payment of the 2001 slaughter premiums. 
Komisija, ki je v zvezi s tem prejela vprašanje ene od držav članic, ni pred 30. junijem 2002, ko je potekel rok, določen v uredbah o izplačilu klavnih premij za leto 2001, niti sprejela odločitve niti odgovorila, katero razlago je treba upoštevati.
As a result the Member States adopted differing decisions, leading to inequalities of treatment among farmers. 
Zato so države članice sprejele različne odločitve, kar je privedlo do neenake obravnave rejcev.
The Netherlands, where a significant part of the culling was carried out in abattoirs, did not pay slaughter premiums to farmers in addition to FMD compensation, thereby making a saving for the Community budget of some 3,5 million euro. 
Nizozemska, kjer je bil velik del zakolov opravljen v klavnicah, rejcem poleg nadomestil za slinavko (76) Premije za govedo in ovce.
(77) The official rate used by the Commission (1 euro = 0,62380 pounds sterling) is the rate for December 2001, the date when the United Kingdom submitted its request for reimbursement. 
(77) Devizni tečaj, ki ga Komisija uporablja v skladu s predpisi (1 EUR = 0,62380 funta šterlinga), je iz decembra 2001, ko je Združeno kraljestvo vložilo zahtevek za povračilo.
(78) A total of around 800 animals, corresponding to a sum total of 38 000 euro. 
(78) Skupno približno 800 živali ustreza skupnemu znesku 38 000 EUR.
(79) Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999. however, after the CourtŐs audit visit. 
(79) Uredba Sveta (ES) št.
In the United Kingdom the premiums were not paid, in order to avoid possible duplication with the FMD compensation, which already included them. 
V Združenem kraljestvu premij niso izplačali, da bi preprečili možnost dvojnega izplačila, saj so bile že vključene v nadomestilo za slinavko in parkljevko.
In France the question did not arise because contaminated animals were not slaughtered at abattoirs, and so slaughtering premiums were not paid either. 
V Franciji se to vprašanje ni pojavilo, ker okužene živali niso bile zaklane v klavnici, tako da tudi ni bilo mogoče izplačati klavnih premij.
Rules and procedures governing eligibility of Member StatesŐ expenditure for Community reimbursement were defined late 74. 
Predpisi in postopki, ki urejajo upravičenost držav članic do povračila izdatkov, so bili določeni z zamudo 74.
Under Decision 90/424/EEC the Commission, with the help of the Standing Veterinary Committee (80), is responsible for laying down procedures for implementing the Community financial contribution to Member StatesŐ expenditure. 
Komisija je v skladu z Odločbo 90/424/EGS skupaj s Stalnim veterinarskim odborom (80) zadolžena za določitev načinov izvajanja finančnega prispevka Skupnosti k izdatkom držav članic.
The Commission, again with the CommitteeŐs help, is also responsible for defining the nature of any additional measures that might be needed to eradicate an outbreak of disease, and the nature of the resultant Community financial contribution. 
Komisija ima poleg tega nalogo, da s pomočjo istega odbora določi naravo dodatnih ukrepov, ki bi bili potrebni za izkoreninjenje epidemije živalske bolezni, in finančni prispevek Skupnosti, ki izhaja iz njih.
Before the crisis, the Commission had not made any proposals for procedures for implementing the Community financial contribution, despite the undertaking it had given earlier in response to the follow-up of the CourtŐs 1995 Annual Report, Ôto issue guidelines to the Member States concerning both procedures and the calculation of compensation with regard to Community co-financing of veterinary measuresŐ (see Box 4). 
Komisija pred krizo ni predlagala načinov izvajanja finančnega prispevka Skupnosti, čeprav se je pred tem v odgovoru na letno poročilo Sodišča za leto 1995 obvezala, da bo „državam članicam sporočila smernice glede postopkov in izračuna nadomestila z vidika sofinanciranja veteriarskih ukrepov s strani Skupnosti (...)“ (glej okvir 4).
Neither had it provided Member States with details of the nature of the supporting documents that they would need to keep if their expenditure was to be allowed for Community reimbursement. In this way it deprived itself of resources that were important for its own checks. 
Prav tako državam članicam ni dala natančnih podatkov o naravi dokaznih dokumentov, ki bi jih morale hraniti, da bi bili njihovi izdatki upravičeni do povračila Skupnosti, zaradi česar je ostala brez dragocenih instrumentov, potrebnih za lastni nadzor.
Six months after the start of the crisis it informed the Member States (81) that it would only reimburse compensation for animals Ôat the value the animals had immediately before they became affectedŐ, whereas all the Member States concerned had already paid a substantial part of the compensation to farmers, using different methods (see paragraphs 62 to 66). 
Komisija je šest mesecev po izbruhu krize (81) države članice obvestila, da bo povrnila samo nadomestila za živali „glede na vrednosti, ki so jo imele pred okužbo“, medtem ko so vse zadevne države članice že začele rejcem izplačevati velik del nadomestil po različnih metodah (glej odstavke 62–66).
Furthermore, it did not say how the value would be determined, nor the documents on which it would be based. 
Prav tako ni navedla, kako in na podlagi katerih dokumentov bo določila to vrednost.
(80) The Committee was set up by Council Decision 68/361/EEC (OJ L 255, 18.10.1968, p. 
(80) Odbor, ustanovljen s Sklepom Sveta 68/361/EGS (UL L 255, 18.10.1968, str.
23) and gives an opinion on the CommissionŐs draft proposals on action to be taken. 
23), izda mnenje o osnutkih potrebnih ukrepov, ki jih predlaga Komisija.
(81) The Member States were notified virtually at the end of the epidemic, namely: Ń for Ireland: Decision 2001/646/EC, Ń for France: Decision 2001/653/EC, Ń for the Netherlands: Decision 2001/652/EC, Ń for the United Kingdom: Decision 2001/654/EC. 
(81) Države članice so bile obveščene skoraj ob koncu epidemije, zlasti: — Irska: Odločba 2001/646/ES, — Francija: Odločba 2001/653/ES, — Nizozemska: Odločba 2001/652/ES, — Združeno kraljestvo: Odločba 2001/654/ES.
C 54/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 77. 
C 54/22 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 3.3.2005 77.
Similarly, in the absence of Commission instructions, the Member StatesŐ requests for reimbursement included compensation paid to farmers who had not complied with national provisions implementing the Community directives on notification and movement restrictions (some 972 876 euro in the United Kingdom and 58 769 euro in France, see paragraph 56). 
Države članice so prav tako zaradi pomanjkanja navodil Komisije v svojih zahtevkih za povračilo ohranile nadomestila, izplačana rejcem, ki niso izpolnjevali nacionalnih določb o izvedbi direktiv Skupnosti na področju prijave bolezni in omejitev premikov (približno 972 876 EUR v Združenem kraljestvu in 58 769 EUR v Franciji – glej odstavek 56).