natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V. On the basis of the above observations the Court makes a set of recommendations to the Commission covering different possible scenarios based both on developments in the reunification process and the level of future EU assistance: III. — Despite the difficult political context and a compressed timetable, the Commission managed to establish a programme which reflected the regulation’s objectives. 
V. Na podlagi navedenih opažanj Sodišče Komisiji podaja niz priporočil glede na različne možne scenarije tako na podlagi dogajanja v procesu ponovne združitve kot na ravni prihodnje pomoči EU: Kljub težavnim političnim razmeram in zgoščenemu – časovnemu načrtu je Komisiji uspelo vzpostaviti program, ki je odražal cilje iz uredbe.
It was also able to quickly set up a programme management office and introduce suitable implementation mechanisms. 
Prav tako ji je uspelo hitro ustanoviti urad za upravljanje programa in uvesti ustrezne mehanizme za izvajanje.
The main weaknesses resulted from — the programme support office not operating under more devolved procedures like EU delegations and from contracts for some key staff being limited to three years. 
Glavne slabosti so izvirale iz podpornega urada za program, ki ni deloval po bolj dekoncentriranih postopkih tako kot delegacije – EU, in iz omejitve pogodb za nekatere ključne uslužbence na tri leta.
If there is no settlement in the short term and it is decided that further significant funding should be provided to the TCc, the Commission should take a number of steps to strengthen its management of the assistance programme (see paragraph 64). 
Če kratkoročno ne bo sprave in se odloči, da je treba turški skupnosti na Cipru zagotoviti precejšnje dodatno financiranje, bi morala Komisija sprejeti več korakov za okrepitev svojega upravljanja programa pomoči (glej odstavek 64).
If it is decided not to support a further large-scale assistance programme, an action plan should be prepared to scale down or phase out the Commission Task Force’s operations (see paragraph 65). 
Če se odloči, da se ne bo podpiral nadaljnji obsežen program pomoči, je treba pripraviti akcijski načrt za zmanjšanje obsega ali postopno ukinitev dejavnosti delovne skupine Komisije (glej odstavek 65).
1 The phrase ’northern part of Cyprus’ is a geographical term used to designate the areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of the Republic does not exercise effective control. — If clear progress is made in the reunification process, the Commission should make early preparations for a programme to enable the whole country to benefit from EU funding following reunification (see paragraph 66). 
1 Izraz„severni del Cipra“ je geografski termin, ki označuje območja Republike Ciper, na katerih Vlada Republike Ciper ne izvaja dejanskega nadzora. – Če pride do jasnega napredka pri procesu ponovne združitve, bi morala Komisija zgodaj začeti pripravljati program, da se celotni državi omogoči korist od financiranja EU po ponovni združitvi (glej odstavek 66).
Special Report No 6/2012 — European Union assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community 6 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND 1. 
6/2012 – Pomoč Evropske unije turški skupnosti na Cipru 6 UVOD OZADJE 1.
Cyprus became independent in 1960. 
Ciper se je osamosvojil leta 1960.
The Treaty of Guarantee signed the same year by Greece, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the representatives of the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot communities intended to guarantee the basic provisions of the constitution and the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Cyprus. 
Garancijska pogodba, ki so jo istega leta podpisali Grčija, Turčija, Združeno kraljestvo ter predstavniki grške in turške skupnosti na Cipru, naj bi zajamčila osnovne ustavne določbe ter ozemeljsko celovitost in suverenost Cipra.
However, disagreements over the revision of the constitution soon surfaced and led to a political breakdown in 1963 and an upsurge in intercommunal violence. 
Vendar so se kmalu pokazala nesoglasja pri prenovi ustave, ki so leta 1963 privedla do političnega zlo-ma in porasta nasilja med obema skupnostma.
After United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolution 186 in March 1964, the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) was established and is still in place with a current strength of approximately 1 000 troops. 
Po resoluciji Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov (ZN) št. 186 marca 1964 je bila ustanovljena mirovna misija ZN na Cipru (UNFICYP), ki je še vedno tam in trenutno šteje okoli 1 000 vojakov.
The existing de facto division of Cyprus dates back to Turkey’s military intervention in the northern part of the island in July 1974. 
Obstoječa dejanska razdelitev Cipra je posledica turškega vojaškega posega na severnem delu otoka julija 1974.
This followed years of intercommunal struggles and a short-lived military coup by sections of the Cypriot National Guard led by Greek officers. 
Ta je sledil letom bojev med obema skupnostma in kratkotrajnemu vojaškemu udaru nekaterih oddelkov ciprske narodne garde, ki so ga vodili grški častniki.
In the aftermath of the Turkish military intervention the UN Security Council expanded UNFICYP’s mandate, which now includes supervision of the de facto ceasefire and maintenance of a buffer zone along the ’green line‘ which marks out the northern and southern parts of the island. 
Po turškem vojaškem posegu je Varnostni svet ZN povečal pooblastila UNFICYP, ki zdaj zajemajo nadziranje dejanskega premirja in ohranjanje nevtralnega območja ob „zeleni črti“, ki ločuje severni in južni del otoka.
As a result of the 1974 events, the vast majority of Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots live separately on the respective sides of the buffer zone. 
Zaradi dogodkov leta 1974 grški in turški prebivalci Cipra večinoma živijo ločeno vsaki na svoji strani zelene črte.
The resulting property issue has been one of the most difficult problems to solve as part of the ongoing efforts to reach a settlement (see paragraph 32). 
Vprašanje lastnine, ki se je s tem pojavilo, je eden največjih problemov, ki ga je treba rešiti v okviru tekočih prizadevanj za dosego dogovora (glej odstavek 32).
The self-proclaimed ’Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus‘ was declared on 15 November 1983 but is recognised only by Turkey. 
Samozvana„Turška republika Severni Ciper“ je bila razglašena 15. novembra 1983, vendar jo priznava samo Turčija.
UN Security Council Resolution 541 (18 November 1983) states that the attempt to create the ’Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus’ was invalid. 
V resoluciji Varnostnega sveta ZN št. 541 (18. november 1983) je navedeno, da je bil poskus ustanovitve „Turške republike Severni Ciper“ nezakonit.
The UN recognises the sovereignty of the Republic of Cyprus according to the terms of its independence in 1960. 
ZN priznavajo suverenost Republike Ciper v skladu s pogoji njene neodvisnosti iz leta 1960.
At its meeting in Helsinki in December 1999, the European Council decided that a political settlement would not be a precondition for the accession of Cyprus to the European Union (EU), although it underlined that a settlement would facilitate the accession process. 
Evropski svet se je na svojem zasedanju v Helsinkih decembra 1999 odločil, da politična sprava ne bo predpogoj za vstop Cipra v Evropsko unijo (EU), čeprav je poudaril, da bi sprava olajšala pristopni proces.
In December 2002, the European Council decided in Copenhagen that Cyprus would be admitted as a new EU Member State, while reiterating its preference for the accession of a unified Cyprus. Special Report No 6/2012 — European Union assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community 
Decembra 2002 je Evropski svet v Københavnu sklenil, da bo Ciper sprejet za novo državo članico EU, in ponovno poudaril, da si želi pristop združenega Cipra. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2012 – Pomoč Evropske unije turški skupnosti na Cipru
However, in an April 2004 referendum the Annan Settlement Plan was rejected by 76 % of the Greek Cypriots voting, while 65 % of Turkish Cypriots voting approved it. 
Vendar je na referendumu aprila 2004 Ananov mirovni načrt 76 % ciprskih Grkov, ki so glasovali, zavrnilo, 65 % ciprskih Turkov, ki so glasovali, pa ga je sprejelo.
The Republic of Cyprus therefore joined the EU on 1 May 2004 with the island still de facto divided. 
Tako je 1. maja 2004 Republika Ciper vstopila v EU z dejansko še vedno razdeljenim otokom.
While the whole island legally is part of the EU, the acquis communautaire is suspended in the northern part, an area over which the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control. 
Čeprav je pravno cel otok del EU, se pravni red EU na severnem delu otoka, na katerem Republika Ciper ne izvaja dejanskega nadzora, začasno ne izvaja.
This constitutes a unique political, legal and diplomatic context. 
To pomeni izjemne politične, pravne in diplomatske razmere.
A new round of UN-sponsored talks was launched in September 2008 and is still ongoing. 
Septembra 2008 se je začel nov krog pogovorov pod okriljem ZN, ki še vedno poteka.
The United Nations Secretary-General and the leaders of the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot communities agreed to meet for a fifth time in January 2012. 
Generalni sekretar Združenih narodov ter voditelji grške in turške skupnosti na Cipru so se dogovorili, da se petič sestanejo januarja 2012.
EU FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 8. 
FINANČNA POMOČ EU 8.
Following the 2004 referendum the Council (General Affairs and External Relations), a week before the accession of the Republic of Cyprus to the EU, requested the Commission to submit a proposal for an aid programme. 
Po referendumu leta 2004 je Svet (za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose) teden dni pred vstopom Republike Ciper v Evropsko unijo od Komisije zahteval, da pripravi predlog programa pomoči.
In its conclusions the Council stated: ‘The Turkish Cypriot community has expressed their clear desire for a future within the European Union. 
V svojih sklepih je navedel: „Skupnost ciprskih Turkov je jasno izrazila željo po prihodnosti v Evropski uniji.
The Council is determined to put an end to the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community and to facilitate the reunification of Cyprus by encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community. 
Svet je odločen odpraviti izolacijo turške ciprske skupnosti in pospešiti združitev Cipra s spodbujanjem gospodarskega razvoja turške ciprske skupnosti.
The Council invited the Commission to bring forward comprehensive proposals to this end, with particular emphasis on the economic integration of the island and on improving contact between the two communities and with the EU.’2 9. 
Svet je pozval Komisijo, da v ta namen predloži izčrpne predloge, s posebnim poudarkom na gospodarskem povezovanju otoka in izboljšanju stikov med dvema skupnostma in Evropsko unijo2.“ 9.
On 7 July 2004, the Commission proposed a package of two regulations: one for a financial support instrument to encourage the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community and a ’direct trade‘ regulation. 
Komisija je julija 2004 predlagala sklop dveh uredb: eno o instrumentu finančne podpore za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja skupnosti ciprskih Turkov in uredbo o „neposredni trgovini“.
It proved, however, difficult for the Council to agree on the adoption of this package and the two regulations had to be decoupled3. 
Vendar je imel Svet pri sprejemanju tega sklopa težave in uredbi je bilo treba ločiti3.
2 Council Conclusions on Cyprus, DG E I 8907/04. 
2 Sklepi Sveta o Cipru, DG E I 8907/04.
Brussels: Council of the European Union, 27.4.2004. 
Bruselj: Svet Evropske unije, 27.4.2004.
3 No progress has been made for the adoption of the ’direct trade‘ regulation. 
3 Pri sprejemanju uredbe o„neposredni trgovini“ ni bilo nobenega napredka.
The movement of persons, goods and services from the northern to the southern part of Cyprus is regulated by the ’Green Line Regulation‘ which entered into force on 1.5.2004, Council Regulation (EC) No 866/2004 of 29 April 2004 on a regime under Article 2 of Protocol No 10 of the Act of Accession (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 
Pretok oseb, blaga in storitev med severnim in južnim delom Cipra ureja„Uredba o zeleni črti“, ki je začela veljati 1. 5. 2004 (Uredba Sveta (ES) št.
128). 
128)).
7 Special Report No 6/2012 — European Union assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community 
7 Posebno poročilo št. 6/2012 – Pomoč Evropske unije turški skupnosti na Cipru
The Council regulation for the instrument of financial support was eventually adopted on 27 February 20064 with an initial allocation of 258,8 million euro. 
Uredba Sveta o instrumentu finančne podpore je bila nazadnje sprejeta 27. februarja 20064 z začetno dodelitvijo 258,8 milijona EUR.
This was in fact the amount which had been earmarked for the Turkish Cypriot community for the implementation of EU policies in Cyprus if a political settlement was reached before accession. 
To je bil dejansko znesek, namenjen turški skupnosti na Cipru za izvajanje politik EU na Cipru, če bi bila politična rešitev dosežena pred pristopom.
Smaller additional amounts totalling 33,5 million euro were allocated over the period 2009–11. 
V obdobju od leta 2009 do leta 2011 so bili dodeljeni manjši dodatni zneski v skupni vrednosti 33,5 milijona EUR.
The funding allocation to the instrument’s objectives is set out in the Table. 
Dodelitev finančnih sredstev za doseganje ciljev instrumenta je prikazana v tabeli.
A detailed list of the projects funded under each objective is given in Annex I. As at 30 September 2011 some 69 % of the total contracted amount for the instrument had been paid by the Commission. 
Podroben seznam projektov, financiranih v okviru posameznih ciljev, je v Prilogi I. Komisija je do 30. septembra 2011 plačala približno 69 % skupnega zneska, za katerega so bile sklenjene pogodbe v okviru tega instrumenta.
4 Council Regulation (EC) No 389/2006 of 27 February 2006 establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000 of 5 December 2000 on the European Agency for Reconstruction (OJ L 65, 7.3.2006, p. 
4 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 389/2006 z dne 27. februarja 2006 o oblikovanju instrumenta finančne podpore za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja turške skupnosti na Cipru in o spremembah Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
5). 8 TABLE FINANCIAL ALLOCATIONS BY OBJECTIVE (AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2011) (million euro) Planned % of total planned Contracted Paid % paid of total contracted Objective 1 Developing and restructuring of infrastructure 129,25 44,2 % 135,02 76,49 56,6 % Objective 2 Promoting social and economic development 84,65 29,0 % 64,87 49,41 76,2 % Objective 3 Fostering reconciliation, confidence-building measures and support to civil society 23,50 8,0 % 19,90 17,61 88,5 % Objective 4 Bringing the Turkish Cypriot community closer to the EU 12,50 4,3 % 8,62 7,49 87,0 % Objective 51 Preparing the Turkish Cypriot community to introduce and implement the acquis communautaire and unallocated TA and Programme Reserve facility 21,35 7,3 % 15,69 14,15 90,2 % Subtotal — Operational part 271,25 92,8 % 244,10 165,15 67,7 % Management (Staff and Missions), Logistics 21,05 7,2 % 15,30 13,64 89,1 % Total 292,30 1 ’Objective 5‘ here includes Unallocated Technical Assistance and a Programme Reserve Facility to which 1,74 million euro has been allocated. 
5). 8 TABELA DODELITEV FINANČNIH SREDSTEV PO CILJIH (NA DAN 30. SEPTEMBRA 2011) (v milijonih EUR) Načrtovano % načrtovanega Sklenjene pogodbe Plačano Plačan delež skupne vrednosti sklenjenih pogodb v % Cilj 1 Razvoj in prestrukturiranje infrastrukture 129,25 44,2 % 135,02 76,49 56,6 % Cilj 2 Pospeševanje socialnega in gospodarskega razvoja 84,65 29,0 % 64,87 49,41 76,2 % Cilj 3 Spodbujanje sprave, ukrepi za krepitev zaupanja in podpiranje civilne družbe 23,50 8,0 % 19,90 17,61 88,5 % Cilj 4 Približevanje turške skupnosti na Cipru EU 12,50 4,3 % 8,62 7,49 87,0 % Cilj 51 Priprava turške skupnosti na Cipru na sprejetje in izvajanje pravnega reda EU 21,35 7,3 % 15,69 14,15 90,2 % Vmesni seštevek za operativni del 271,25 92,8 % 244,10 165,15 67,7% Upravljanje (osebje in službena potovanja), logistika 21,05 7,2 % 15,30 13,64 89,1 % Skupaj 292,30 1 „Cilj 5“ tukaj zajema nedodeljeno tehnično pomoč in rezervni instrument za program, v katerega je bilo dodeljenih 1,74 milijona EUR.
100,0 % 259,40 178,79 68,9 % Special Report No 6/2012 — European Union assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community 
100,0 % 259,40 178,79 68,9 % Posebno poročilo št. 6/2012 – Pomoč Evropske unije turški skupnosti na Cipru
9 AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH 11. 
9 OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP 11.
The audit addressed the overall question: ‘Is the Commission managing the EU instrument of financial support to the Turkish Cypriot community effectively?’ This question focused on whether: (a) the Commission had been able to draw up an assistance programme which reflected the instrument’s objectives and had put appropriate arrangements in place for implementing it; (b) the individual projects financed in the framework of the programme are achieving their intended results and whether they are likely to be sustainable. 
Revizija je obravnavala naslednje vprašanje: „Ali Komisija uspešno upravlja instrument finančne podpore EU turški skupnosti na Cipru?“ Osredotočeno je bilo na to, ali: (a) je Komisiji uspelo pripraviti program pomoči, ki je odražal cilje instrumenta, in vzpostaviti ustrezne ureditve za njegovo izvajanje; (b) posamezni projekti, financirani v okviru programa, dosegajo svoje načrtovane rezultate in ali obstaja verjetnost, da bodo trajnostni.
The audit did not seek to assess whether the programme is contributing to the instrument’s political objective of reunification. 
Revizija ni imela za cilj oceniti, ali program prispeva k doseganju ponovne združitve, ki je politični cilj instrumenta.
The audit gathered evidence for its assessment through documentary review, interviews and three on-the-spot audit visits to Cyprus in 2011. 
Med revizijo so bili dokazi za oceno zbrani s pregledom dokumentacije, pogovori in tremi revizijskimi obiski na Cipru leta 2011.
In particular, the audit examined a sample of 34 contracts selected from nine of the main projects out of 24 projects funded through the programme and covering all five of the instrument’s policy objectives. 
Preučen je bil vzorec s 34 pogodbami, izbranimi iz devetih glavnih projektov od 24 projektov, ki so bili financirani prek programa in zajemajo vseh pet ciljev politike instrumenta.
The contracts audited totalled 97,5 million euro or one third of the total budget allocations to the instrument (292,3 million euro). 
Skupna vrednost revidiranih pogodb je bila 97,5 milijona EUR ali tretjina vseh proračunskih sredstev, dodeljenih instrumentu (292,3 milijona EUR).
The complete list of contracts covered by the audit is given in Annex II. 
Popoln seznam pogodb, zajetih v revizijo, je naveden v Prilogi II.
Special Report No 6/2012 — European Union assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community 10 OBSERVATIONS THE COMMISSION FACED SIGNIFICANT CONSTRAINTS IN THE SETTING UP AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME 13. 
6/2012 – Pomoč Evropske unije turški skupnosti na Cipru 10 OPAŽANJA KOMISIJA SE JE SOOČALA S PRECEJŠNJIMI OMEJITVAMI PRI VZPOSTAVLJANJU IN IZVAJANJU PROGRAMA 13.
The audit assessed whether the Commission had effectively managed the setting up of the programme. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ocenjeno, ali je Komisija uspešno vodila vzpostavitev programa.
To do this it examined whether it had established clear, logical and timely priorities and actions focused on the main objectives of the instrument and based on the needs of the TCc. 
V ta namen je bilo preučeno, ali je določila jasne, logične in časovno ustrezne prednostne naloge in dejavnosti, ki so osredotočene na glavne cilje instrumenta in temeljijo na potrebah turške skupnosti na Cipru.
It also examined whether the Commission, in setting up the specific implementation structures and procedures for this programme, had taken account of previous Commission experience, had evaluated different possible options, and had ensured it had adequate expertise to implement the programme. 
Prav tako je bilo preučeno, ali je Komisija pri vzpostavljanju posebnih izvajalskih struktur in postopkov za ta program upoštevala svoje prejšnje izkušnje, ovrednotila različne možnosti in poskrbela, da ima ustrezno strokovno znanje za izvajanje programa.
INTERVENTIONS REFLECTED THE PROGRAMME’S OBJECTIVES DESPITE THE WIDE RANGE OF SECTORS TO BE COVERED, THE REGULATION’S DELAYED ADOPTION, AND THE ABSENCE OF A MULTIANNUAL PERSPECTIVE 14. 
INTERVENCIJE SO ODRAŽALE CILJE PROGRAMA, KLJUB TEMU DA JE BILO TREBA ZAJETI ŠIROK RAZPON SEKTORJEV, DA JE BILA UREDBA SPREJETA POZNO IN DA NI BILO VEČLETNE PERSPEKTIVE 14.
The overall objective of the assistance financed by the instrument according to Article 1 of the Council regulation is to facilitate the reunification of Cyprus. 
V skladu s členom 1 Uredbe Sveta je skupni cilj pomoči, financirane s tem instrumentom, pomoč za olajšanje ponovne združitve Cipra.
This is to be done ‘by encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community with particular emphasis on the economic integration of the island, on improving contacts between the two communities and with the EU, and on preparation for the acquis communautaire’. 
To naj bi bilo izvedeno „tako da spodbuja gospodarski razvoj turške skupnosti na Cipru, pri čemer namenja posebno pozornost gospodarskemu povezovanju otoka, izboljšanju stikov med obema skupnostma in z EU ter spodbuja pripravo na prevzem pravnega reda Skupnosti“.
Article 2 of the regulation lists a wide range of more specific objectives which the assistance is required to cover (see Box 1). 
V členu 2 Uredbe je naštet širok razpon podrobnejših ciljev, ki jih mora zajeti pomoč (glej okvir 1).
This broad formulation of the objectives meant that assistance had to be funded across a wide range of sectors which represented a considerable implementation challenge for the Commission, including in relation to allocating the necessary human resources. 
Ta široka ubeseditev ciljev je pomenila, da je bilo treba pomoč financirati po številnih sektorjih, kar je Komisiji predstavljalo precejšen izziv pri izvajanju, vključno v zvezi z dodeljevanjem potrebnih človeških virov.
An approach focused on a more limited number of objectives would have allowed the Commission to better target the assistance. 
Pristop, osredotočen na manjše število ciljev, bi Komisiji omogočil boljše ciljno usmerjanje pomoči.
All the audited interventions contributed to varying degrees to the regulation’s objectives in Article 2. 
Vse revidirane intervencije so v različnem obsegu prispevale k doseganju ciljev iz člena 2 Uredbe.
The focus on infrastructure and economic development of the TCc was intended to ensure that the level of development of the TCc economy compared to that of the Greek Cypriot community would not be an obstacle to a political settlement. 
Osredotočenost na infrastrukturo in gospodarski razvoj turške skupnosti na Cipru naj bi zagotovila, da stopnja gospodarske razvitosti turške skupnosti na Cipru v primerjavi z grško skupnostjo na Cipru ne bi bila ovira za politično rešitev.
The largest financial allocations were made to the water and sanitation and rural development sectors. 
Največje finančne dodelitve so bile namenjene vodnemu in sanitarnemu sektorju ter sektorju razvoja podeželja.
This reflected the priority needs, the absorption capacity in the different sectors, and the results of the specific feasibility studies carried out (see Table and Annex I). 
To je odražalo prednostne potrebe, zmogljivosti črpanja v različnih sektorjih ter rezultate posebnih študij izvedljivosti, ki so bile opravljene (glej tabelo in Prilogo I).