natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reimbursement spending was most affected by error The correct calculation of payments to recipients of funding often depends on information provided by the recipients themselves. 
Napake so najbolj vplivale na porabo na podlagi povračila stroškov Pravilen izračun plačil prejemnikom financiranja je pogosto odvisen od informacij, ki jih zagotovijo sami prejemniki.
This is especially significant in the area of reimbursement activities. 
To je zlasti bistveno pri dejavnostih, upravičenih do povračila.
EU spending by programme expenditure type includes the following errors: ο For reimbursement expenditure, the estimated level of error is 5.5 % (2013: 5.6 %). 
Poraba EU po vrstah programov porabe vključuje naslednje napake: ο za odhodke na podlagi povračila stroškov ocenjena stopnja napake znaša 5,5 % (leta 2013: 5,6 %).
Typical errors in this area include ineligible costs contained in the cost claims, ineligible projects, activities and beneficiaries, and serious infringement of public procurement rules. ο For entitlement programmes, the estimated level of error is 2.7 % (2013: 3.0 %), with typical errors including over-declarations by farmers of agricultural areas and administrative errors affecting payments to farmers. 
Značilne napake na tem področju vključujejo neupravičene stroške v zahtevkih za povračilo stroškov, neupravičene projekte, dejavnosti in upravičence ter resne kršitve pravil o javnem naročanju, ο za programe na podlagi pravic ocenjena stopnja napake znaša 2,7 % (leta 2013: 3,0 %), značilne napake na tem področju pa vključujejo prevelike kmetijske površine, ki jih prijavijo kmetje, in administrativne napake, ki vplivajo na plačila kmetom.
Overall results 16 Diagram 8, based on our audit testing of EU spending over the last 2 years, shows our assessment of the different risk profiles by transaction type as well by estimated levels of error. 
Skupni rezultati 16 V diagramu 8 je prikazana ocena različnih profilov tveganja po vrstah transakcij in po ocenjenih stopnjah napake, ki jo je Sodišče pripravilo na podlagi svojega revizijskega preizkušanja porabe EU v zadnjih dveh letih.
It is based both on elements of professional judgement (assessment of the impact of systems and risks related to transaction type) and empirical elements (levels of error over a 2-year period). 
Temelji na elementih strokovne presoje (ocena učinka sistemov in tveganja glede na vrsto transakcije) in na empiričnih elementih (stopnje napake v dvoletnem obdobju).
The relationship between transaction type, risk and estimated level of error in EU transactions (2013-2014) Overall risk: medium Cohesion and Natural resources reimbursement projects Competitiveness and Global Europe reimbursement projects Estimated level of error Overall risk: high Rural Development area related entitlements Materiality: 2.0 % Overall risk: low Estimated level of error 2013-14 EAGF area related entitlements Research and educational grants - non-reimbursement Overall risk: medium Administration: pay, pensions and other administrative costs Entitlements Reimbursements Higher risk 0 % Budget support Risk stemming from quality of systems Explanation: • Payment streams are grouped according to their nature. • The colour of the circles indicates whether expenditure is based on reimbursement or entitlement. • The size of the circles represents their weight in overall spending. • The position of the circles along the 45 degree line Indicates relative levels of estimated errors. • Reimbursements for Global Europe include multi-donor projects which in practice may have many of the attributes of entitlement spending and are affected by lower levels of error. • The Commission establishes that recipients are entitled to budget support prior to payment. 
Povezava med vrstami transakcij, tveganjem in ocenjeno stopnjo napake v transakcijah EU (obdobje 2013–2014) Skupno tveganje: srednje Projekti, ki temeljijo na povračilu stroškov, za kohezijo in naravne vire Ocenjena stopnja napake Skupno tveganje: visoko Pravice na področju razvoja podeželja Ocenjena stopnja napake za obdobje 2013–2014 Projekti, ki temeljijo na povračilu stroškov, za konkurenčnost in Evropo v svetu Pomembnost: 2,0 % Skupno tveganje: nizko EAGF area related entitlements Pravice v zvezi z Evropskim kmetijskim jamstvenim skladom Uprava: plače, pokojnine in drugi stroški uprave Skupno tveganje: srednje 0 % Proračunska podpora Pravice Povračila Višje tveganje Tveganje, ki izvira iz kakovosti sistemov Razlaga: • Tokovi plačil so zbrani v skupine glede na njihovo naravo. • Barva krogov kaže, ali odhodki temeljijo na povračilu stroškov ali pravicah. • Velikost krogov je odraz njihove pomembnosti v skupni porabi. • Položaj krogov vzdolž premice pod kotom 45 stopinj odraža sorazmerne stopnje ocenjenih napak. • Povračila v okviru razdelka Evropa v svetu vključujejo večdonatorske projekte, ki imajo v praksi veliko lastnosti porabe na podlagi pravic in pri katerih so stopnje napake nižje. • Komisija pred plačilom ugotovi, ali so prejemniki upravičeni do proračunske podpore.
Risk stemming from nature and complexity of transactions Higher risk Diagram 8 
Tveganje, ki izvira iz narave in zapletenosti transakcij Višje tveganje Diagram 8
Overall results 17 Corrective action significantly reduced the estimated level of error The Member States and the Commission apply corrective measures in cases of irregular expenditure and when errors in payments had not been detected earlier in the process. 
Skupni rezultati 17 Popravljalni ukrepi so bistveno zmanjšali ocenjeno stopnjo napake Države članice in Komisija uporabljajo popravljalne ukrepe v primerih nepravilnih odhodkov in takrat, kadar napake v plačilih niso bile ugotovljene v zgodnejši fazi.
The mechanisms applied to make and record corrective action are complex. 
Mehanizmi za izvedbo in evidentiranje popravljalnih ukrepov so zapleteni.
We seek to take account of these measures in the results of our audits when they are made prior to payment or before our examination. 
Sodišče si pri rezultatih svojih revizij te ukrepe prizadeva upoštevati, če so izvedeni pred plačilom ali pred preučevanjem, ki ga opravi Sodišče.
We check the application of the corrections (for example, recoveries from beneficiaries and corrections at project level) and adjust the quantification of error whenever this is appropriate. 
Sodišče preveri izvedbo popravkov (npr. izterjav od upravičencev in popravkov na projektni ravni) ter prilagodi količinsko opredelitev napake, kadar je ustrezno.
While, we take note of corrections made after notification of our audits, we do not assume that a corrective action stimulated by our work is representative of the population as a whole. 
Sodišče sicer upošteva popravke, izvršene po obvestilu o njegovi reviziji, vendar meni, da popravljalni ukrepi, ki jih spodbudi njegovo delo, niso reprezentativni za populacijo kot celoto.
In 2014, if such corrective measures had not been applied to the payments audited by us, our overall estimated level of error would have been 5.5 % rather than 4.4 %. 
Če se leta 2014 za plačila, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, ti popravljalni ukrepi ne bi uporabili, bi skupna ocenjena stopnja napake znašala 5,5 % namesto 4,4 %.
However, we also found that for some transactions affected by error, if the Commission, authorities in the Member States or independent auditors had made use of all information available to them, they could have prevented, or detected and corrected the errors before the related errors were made. 
Toda Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da bi Komisija, organi v državah članicah ali neodvisni revizorji pri nekaterih transakcijah lahko preprečili ali odkrili in popravili napake, preden bi do njih prišlo, če bi uporabili vse informacije, ki so jih imeli na voljo.
Based on transactions within our samples, this had the potential to reduce estimated levels of error both for shared management spending and spending directly managed by the Commission. 
Na podlagi transakcij v vzorcih Sodišča bi to lahko zmanjšalo ravni napake tako pri porabi, za katero se uporablja deljeno upravljanje, kot tudi pri porabi, ki jo neposredno upravlja Komisija.
For example, using all information available might have reduced the level of error by 3.3 percentage points for both expenditure under regional and urban policy (6.1 %) and for rural development, environment, climate action and fisheries (6.2 %) — see pages 34 to 38. 
Uporaba vseh razpoložljivih informacij bi na primer lahko znižala stopnjo napake za 3,3 odstotne točke za odhodke v okviru regionalne in mestne politike (6,1 %) ter razvoja podeželja, okolja, podnebnih ukrepov in ribištva (6,2 %) (glej str. 34 do 38).
In competitiveness for growth and jobs, directly managed by the Commission, the estimated level of error (5.6 %) might have been reduced by 2.8 percentage points — see pages 27 to 29. 
Na področju konkurenčnosti za rast in delovna mesta, ki ga neposredno upravlja Komisija, bi se ocenjena stopnja napake lahko znižala za 2,8 % odstotne točke (glej str. 27 do 29).
Overall results 18 Scope for further improvement in the Commission’s assessment of risk and Each Commission directorate-general produces an annual activity report. 
Skupni rezultati 18 Možnosti za dodatno izboljšanje pri oceni tveganja, ki ga izvede Komisija, in pri učinku popravljalnih ukrepov Vsak generalni direktorat Komisije pripravi letno poročilo o dejavnostih.
The Commission’s synthesis report incorporates a summary of this information and a statement whereby it takes overall political responsibility for its management of the EU budget. 
V zbirnem poročilu Komisije je povzetek teh informacij in izjava, s katero prevzema splošno politično odgovornost za svoje upravljanje proračuna EU.
We found the information in the synthesis report for 2014 to be better than in previous years. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so informacije v zbirnem poročilu za leto 2014 boljše kot v prejšnjih letih.
The accounts now show which corrections had been already made before payments were recorded. 
Iz računovodskih izkazov je zdaj razvidno, kateri popravki so bili izvedeni že pred izvršitvijo plačil.
There is scope, however, for further information to be given and for ensuring a consistent and accurate assessment and presentation of risk and impact of corrective actions. impact of corrective actions Want to know more? 
Še vedno pa obstajajo možnosti za zagotavljanje dodatnih informacij ter dosledne in točne ocene in predstavitve tveganja in učinka popravljalnih ukrepov. Želite izvedeti več?
Full information on the main findings can be found in Chapter 1 ‘The statement of assurance and supporting information’ of the 2014 annual report on the EU budget. 
Vse informacije o najpomembnejših ugotovitvah so v poglavju 1 letnega poročila za leto 2014 o proračunu EU – Izjava o zanesljivosti in podporne informacije.
The full text of our annual report can be found on our website: http://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/AR2014.aspx 
Celotno besedilo letnega poročila Sodišča je na voljo na spletni strani Sodišča http://www.eca.europa.eu/sl/Pages/AR2014.aspx.
Overall results 19 High level of potential claims and payments from 2007-2013 programming The budget for payments in 2014 was the second highest ever. 
Skupni rezultati 19 Visoka raven potencialnih zahtevkov in plačil iz programskega obdobja Proračun za plačila je bil leta 2014 drugi največji doslej.
As in 2013, the final level of payments (€142.5 billion) was approximately 5 % higher than the initial forecast in the MFF (€135.9 billion). 
Kot leta 2013 je bila končna raven plačil (142,5 milijarde EUR) približno 5 % višja od sprva napovedane v večletnem finančnem okviru (135,9 milijarde EUR).
This was realised through seven amending budgets and included the activation of the ‘contingency margin’ — a last-resort instrument to react to unforeseen circumstances. 
To zvišanje je bilo izvedeno s sedmimi spremembami proračuna, vključevalo pa je aktivacijo varnostne rezerve, ki je „skrajna možnost za odziv na nepredvidene okoliščine”.
The ‘economic result’ for 2014 was a deficit: liabilities grew faster than assets. 
Poslovni izid za leto 2014 je bil primanjkljaj: obveznosti so rasle hitreje kot sredstva.
The level of commitments in 2014 was well within the overall limit (76.6 % of amount available). 
Prevzete obveznosti so bile leta 2014 v okviru splošne meje (76,6 % razpoložljivega zneska).
This reflected the level of progress in the approval of new programmes by the Commission in the first year of the MFF 2014-2020. period What are commitments and payments? 
To je odražalo raven napredka pri tem, kako je Komisija odobravala nove programe v prvem letu večletnega finančnega okvira 2014–2020. 2007–2013 Kaj so prevzete obveznosti in plačila?
The EU budget has two components: commitments (representing amounts to be paid in the current or future years) and payments (covering payments of funds in the current year). 
Proračun EU ima dve komponenti: prevzete obveznosti (zneske, ki jih je treba plačati v tekočem ali prihodnjih letih) in plačila (kritje za izplačila sredstev v tekočem letu).
Payments can only be made against a valid commitment. 
Plačila se lahko izvršijo samo za veljavne prevzete obveznosti.
The annual ceilings for commitments and payments are laid down in the multiannual financial frameworks agreed by the Council and Parliament. 
Letne zgornje meje za prevzete obveznosti in plačila so določene v večletnih finančnih okvirih, o katerih se dogovorita Svet in Parlament.
Backlogs in the absorption of multiannual funds are significant, and may pose a significant challenge to some Member States. 
Pri črpanju večletnih sredstev prihaja do bistvenih zaostankov, ki so lahko velik izziv za nekatere države članice.
We recommend that the Commission considers, in its budgetary and financial management, the capacity constraints in certain Member States. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija pri svojem upravljanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju upošteva omejitve zmogljivosti v nekaterih državah članicah.
The accumulated outstanding budget commitments on expenditure of a multiannual nature remain at a very high level. 
Akumulirana neporabljena sredstva za prevzete proračunske obveznosti za večletne odhodke ostajajo na visoki ravni.
Most of these commitments relate to the previous MFF covering 2007-2013. 
Večina teh prevzetih obveznosti se nanaša na prejšnji večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013.
We also found excessive cash balances in financial instruments. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi prekomerna stanja denarnih sredstev v finančnih instrumentih.
We recommend that the Commission considers measures to reduce outstanding commitments, including faster closure of the 2007-2013 programmes and a reduction of cash held by fiduciaries. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija razmisli o ukrepih za zmanjšanje neporabljenih sredstev za prevzete proračunske obveznosti, vključno s hitrejšim zaključevanjem programov iz obdobja 2007–2013 in zmanjšanjem denarnih sredstev, ki jih imajo upravitelji.
We also recommend that a longer term perspective is adopted, including forecasts covering budgetary ceilings, payment needs, capacity constraints and potential de-commitments. Want to know more? 
Poleg tega priporoča sprejetje dolgoročnejše perspektive, vključno z napovedmi, ki zajemajo proračunske zgornje meje, potrebe po plačilih, omejitve zmogljivosti in morebitne razveljavitve prevzetih obveznosti. Želite izvedeti več?
Full information on the main findings on budgetary and financial management can be found in Chapter 2 of the 2014 annual report on the EU budget. 
Vse informacije o glavnih ugotovitvah v zvezi z upravljanjem proračuna in finančnim poslovodenjem so v poglavju 2 letnega poročila o proračunu EU za leto 2014.
Overall results 20 Reporting on performance is still weak EU money should be spent in line with the principles of sound financial management: economy, efficiency and effectiveness. 
Skupni rezultati 20 Poročanje o smotrnosti je še vedno slabo Sredstva EU je treba porabljati v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, ki so gospodarnost, učinkovitost in uspešnost.
Achieving good performance involves inputs (financial, human, material, organisational or regulatory means needed for the implementation of the programme), outputs (the deliverables of the programme), results (the immediate effects of the programme on direct addressees or recipients) and impacts (long-term changes in society that are, at least partly, attributable to the EU’s action). 
Doseganje smotrnosti zajema vložke (finančna, kadrovska, materialna, organizacijska ali zakonska sredstva, potrebna za izvedbo programa), izložke (kaj je bilo narejeno v okviru programa), rezultate (takojšnji vplivi programa na neposredne naslovnike ali prejemnike) in učinke (dolgoročne spremembe v družbi, ki jih je vsaj delno mogoče pripisati ukrepom EU).
Europe 2020 is the EU’s 10-year jobs and growth strategy. It provides a focus for both EU and national spending. 
Evropa 2020 je desetletna strategija EU za delovna mesta in rast, ki usmerja porabo EU in nacionalno porabo.
The strategy was launched in 2010 to create conditions for ‘smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’. 
Uvedena je bila leta 2010, da bi ustvarila pogoje za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast.
Challenging framework for monitoring and reporting on Europe 2020 Beneath the political aspirations of Europe 2020, there is a complex architecture comprising five headline targets, seven flagship initiatives and, for the European Structural and Investment (ESI) funds, 11 thematic objectives. 
Zahteven okvir za spremljanje strategije Evropa 2020 in poročanje o njej Na ravneh pod političnimi prizadevanji v zvezi s strategijo Evropa 2020 je zapletena struktura, ki vsebuje pet krovnih ciljnih vrednosti, sedem vodilnih pobud, za evropske strukturne in investicijske sklade (ESI) pa 11 tematskih ciljev.
We found, however, these various tiers are not, either individually or as a whole, designed to translate the political aspirations of Europe 2020 into useful operational objectives. 
Toda Sodišče je ugotovilo, da te različne ravni niti posamezno niti kot celota niso zasnovane tako, da bi prenašale politična prizadevanja strategije Evropa 2020 v koristne operativne cilje.
The periods of the 10-year Europe 2020 strategy and the EU’s 7-year budgetary cycle, known as the multiannual financial framework (MFF) are not aligned. 
Desetletno obdobje strategije Evropa 2020 in sedemletni proračunski cikel EU, t. i. večletni finančni okvir, nista usklajena.
The monitoring and reporting framework underlying the MFF was brought in line with Europe 2020 only from the 2014-2020 MFF period. 
Okvir za spremljanje in poročanje za večletni finančni okvir je bil šele z večletnim finančnim okvirom za obdobje 2014–2020 usklajen s strategijo Evropa 2020.
The first half of the implementation of Europe 2020 has, therefore, taken place under an MFF designed for a different strategy. 
Prva polovica izvajanja strategije Evropa 2020 zato poteka pod večletnim finančnim okvirom, ki je bil zasnovan za drugo strategijo.
This limits the Commission’s ability to monitor the contribution of the EU budget to Europe 2020 during the 2007-2013 MFF period. 
To omejuje možnosti Komisije za spremljanje prispevka proračuna EU k strategiji Evropa 2020 v večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2007–2013.
We also found that the Commission has so far reported on the contribution of the EU budget to the Europe 2020 objectives only in a limited way. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da je Komisija o prispevku proračuna EU k doseganju ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 doslej poročala le omejeno.
Some elements of an effective monitoring and reporting system are in place. 
Nekateri elementi uspešnega sistema spremljanja in poročanja so vzpostavljeni.
The statistical branch of the Commission, Eurostat, makes statistical data available on the EU’s and individual Member States achievements of the Europe 2020 headline targets. 
Statistična veja Komisije Eurostat daje na voljo statistične podatke o doseganju krovnih ciljnih vrednosti strategije Evropa 2020 na ravni EU in držav članic.
However, the Commission’s review of Europe 2020 has been delayed until early 2016. 
Toda pregled strategije Evropa 2020, ki ga bo izvedla Komisija, je bil prestavljen na začetek leta 2016.
Moreover, the results of public consultation on Europe 2020 do not provide any feedback on the role of EU programmes for Europe 2020. 
Poleg tega rezultati javnega posvetovanja o strategiji Evropa 2020 ne zagotavljajo nikakršnih povratnih informacij o vlogi programov EU za strategijo Evropa 2020.
We recommend that the Commission makes appropriate proposals to the legislator to better align the EU strategy and the MFF. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija pripravi ustrezne predloge zakonodajalcu za boljšo uskladitev strategije EU in večletnega finančnega okvira.
This would help to ensure that adequate and effective monitoring and reporting arrangements are in place for future EU strategies. 
To bi pomagalo zagotoviti, da so vzpostavljene ustrezne in uspešne ureditve za spremljanje in poročanje za prihodnje strategije EU.
Overall results 21 Inadequate focus on Europe 2020 achievements in partnership agreements and programmes The potential benefits of combining European Structural and Investment (ESI) funds have not been fully realised. 
Skupni rezultati 21 Sporazumi o partnerstvu in programi niso dovolj osredotočeni na dosežke strategije Evropa 2020 Potencialne koristi združevanja evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov (ESI) niso bile v celoti dosežene.
Good use of the ESI funds is central to EU’s efforts to meet the Europe 2020 objectives. 
Dobra uporaba skladov ESI je v središču prizadevanj EU za dosego ciljev strategije Evropa 2020.
Combining the five ESI funds in one umbrella regulation and one partnership agreement for each Member State offers potential advantages in terms of the coherence of the EU action. 
Združevanje petih skladov ESI pod eno krovno uredbo in v po en sporazum o partnerstvu s posamezno državo članico prinaša potencialne koristi za skladnost ukrepov EU.
However, different rules continue to apply at fund level and, as a result, at programme level. 
Toda na ravni sklada in posledično na ravni programa še naprej veljajo različna pravila.
What are partnership agreements and programmes? 
Kaj so sporazumi o partnerstvu in programi?
Partnership agreements between the Commission and each Member State lie at the heart of the ESI funds framework. 
Sporazumi o partnerstvu med Komisijo in posameznimi državami članicami so temelj okvira za sklade ESI.
They outline each country’s development needs and, for each of the ESI funds, set out a summary of the main results expected for each selected thematic objective. 
Očrtujejo razvojne potrebe posamezne države in za vsak sklad ESI zagotavljajo povzetek glavnih pričakovanih rezultatov za vsak izbran tematski cilj.
On the basis of these agreements, Member States establish programmes for each fund (or for several funds) setting out the priorities for the country or region concerned. 
Na osnovi teh sporazumov države članice pripravijo programe za vsak sklad (ali za več skladov), v katerih so navedene prednostne naloge za zadevno državo ali regijo.
Overall results 22 The focus on results should be further improved, in particular in the partnership agreements. 
Skupni rezultati 22 Dodatno bi bilo treba izboljšati osredotočenost na rezultate, zlasti pri sporazumih o partnerstvu.
Although some progress has been made, the focus on results needs to be strengthened. 
Kljub temu, da je bil dosežen nek napredek, je treba okrepiti osredotočenost na rezultate.
In some of the partnership agreements examined, the expected results were vague and often expressed in qualitative terms, without stating the magnitude of change. 
V nekaterih preučenih sporazumih o partnerstvu so bili pričakovani rezultati nejasni in pogosto izraženi kvalitativno, ne da bi bil naveden obseg spremembe.
We recommend that the Commission proposes to the legislator that Member States include in their partnership agreements and programmes the quantified results that the funding is expected to achieve. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija zakonodajalcu in državam članicam predlaga, naj v svoje sporazume o partnerstvu in programe vključijo količinsko opredeljene rezultate, ki naj bi jih po pričakovanjih doseglo financiranje.