natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
48. the court refers in particular to the oEcd definition of active labour market programmes.25 accordingly, measures aiming at the improvement of the beneficiaries’ prospect of finding gainful employment or otherwise increasing their earnings capacity are qualified as active and therefore are considered to meet the conditions for an Eu added value. these measures include not only services such as training, aid for self-employment, coaching and outplacement, but also mobility allowances and educational grants, as well as allowances granted in the context of the EGf and not ordinarily existing under the Member state’s unemployment benefit system. 
Sodišče se sklicuje predvsem na opredelitev OECD za aktivne programe na trgu dela25. V skladu s tem so ukrepi, katerih cilj je izboljšanje možnosti upravičencev za pridobitev plačane zaposlitve ali drugačno povečanje njihove zmožnosti za zaslužek, opredeljeni kot aktivni ukrepi, zato se šteje, da izpolnjujejo pogoje za dodano vrednost EU. Ti ukrepi ne vključujejo samo storitev, kot so usposabljanje, pomoč za samozaposlitev, svetovanje in pomoč pri iskanju nove zaposlitve, temveč tudi nadomestila za mobilnost in štipendije ter nadomestila, ki so dodeljena v okviru ESPG in v sistemih nadomestil za brezposelnost držav članic običajno ne obstajajo.
24 Eca opinion no 1/2010 ‘improving the financial management of the European union budget: risks and challenges’ (http://eca.europa.eu). 
1/2010 – Izboljševanje finančnega poslovodenja proračuna Evropske unije: tveganja in izzivi (http://eca.europa.eu).
25 active labour market programmes — contains all social expenditure (other than education) which is aimed at the improvement of the beneficiaries‘ prospect of finding gainful employment or to otherwise increase their earnings capacity. this category includes spending on public employment services and administration, labour market training, special programmes for youth when in transition from school to work, labour market programmes to provide or promote employment for unemployed and other persons (excluding young and disabled persons) and special programmes for the disabled (‘an interpretative guide to the oEcd social expenditure database’, oEcd, 2007, p. 
25 Aktivni programi na trgu dela vsebujejo vse socialne izdatke (razen za izobraževanje), ki so namenjeni izboljšanju možnosti upravičencev za pridobitev plačane zaposlitve ali povečanju njihove zmožnosti za zaslužek. Ta kategorija vključuje izdatke za javne zavode za zaposlovanje, usposabljanje za nastop na trgu dela, posebne programe za mladino, ki prehaja iz šole na delovno mesto, programe na trgu dela za zagotovitev ali spodbujanje zaposlovanja brezposelnih in drugih oseb (razen mladine in invalidov) ter posebne programe za invalide (An Interpretative Guide to the OECD Social Expenditure Database (Razlagalni vodič po podatkovni zbirki socialnih izdatkov OECD), OECD, 2007, str.
By contrast, workers’ income support measures, consisting of unemployment benefits and programmes for early retirement, cannot be considered as delivering Eu added value. indeed, workers’ income support does not represent an ‘active’ labour market measure26 and moreover this reduces the share of these measures in the EGf package. in the mid-term evaluation, the commission had already reported that on average only 26 % of EGf spending consisted of training measures27. 
Nasprotno pa ukrepi za dohodkovno podporo za delavce, ki vključujejo nadomestila za brezposelnost in programe za predčasno upokojitev, ne morejo veljati za ukrepe, ki ustvarjajo dodano vrednost EU. Dohodkovna podpora za delavce namreč ni „aktiven ukrep na trgu dela“26, poleg tega pa zmanjšuje delež takšnih ukrepov v svežnju ESPG. Komisija je v vmesni oceni že poročala, da ukrepi usposabljanja v povprečju pomenijo samo 26 % porabe ESPG27.
50. as can be seen in Table 3 below, a common pattern among the eight audited cases is that they included EGf measures to provide income support, which would have been paid by the Member states anyway, irrespective of EGf intervention. the impact of this type of EGf intervention is to compensate part of the cost of the Member states’ unemployment benefit system, and there is no added value in such an intervention other than Eu additional funding for the Member states. 
50. Kot je razvidno iz tabele 3, je vseh osem revidiranih zadev vključevalo ukrepe ESPG za zagotavljanje dohodkovne podpore, ki bi jih sicer plačale države članice, ne glede na pomoč ESPG. Učinek te vrste pomoči ESPG, ki razen dodatnih sredstev EU za države članice ne ustvarja nobene dodane vrednosti, je povrnitev dela stroškov sistema nadomestil za brezposelnost držav članic.
26 this means all cash expenditure compensating for unemployment. this includes redundancy payments out of public resources as well as pensions to beneficiaries before they reach the ‘standard’ pensionable age if these payments are made because they are out of work or otherwise for reasons of labour market policy (‘an interpretative guide to the oEcd social expenditure database’, oEcd, 2007, p. 
26 Tu so mišljeni vsi odhodki za nadomestilo za brezposelnost. To vključuje odpravnine, ki se izplačujejo iz javnih sredstev, in pokojnine za upravičence pred dopolnjeno „standardno“ upokojitveno starostjo, če se izplačujejo zaradi brezposelnosti ali iz razlogov v zvezi s politiko trga dela (An Interpretative Guide to the OECD Social Expenditure Database (Razlagalni vodič po podatkovni zbirki socialnih izdatkov OECD), OECD, 2007, str.
27 see mid-term evaluation report, 8 december 2011, p. 
27 Glej poročilo o vmesni oceni, 8. december 2011, str.
42. produced for the commission, the mid-term evaluation was based on a sample of 15 cases approved before the 2009 amendment to the EGf regulation came into force. tablE 3 brEakdown of EGf fundInG by typE of pErsonalIsEd mEasurEs In thE EIGht EGf casEs audItEd 20 Nokia Karmann Danfoss Odense Dell SR Technics AB Snaige ‘Construction’ DE DK IE LT Euro % Euro % Euro % Euro % Euro % Euro % Euro % Euro % Training/ retraining 1 926 538 20 % 2 324 115 24 % 2 368 478 Source: Eca, based on available data from dG Employment, social affairs and inclusion and Member state authorities. 
42. Vmesna ocena, ki je bila pripravljena za Komisijo, je temeljila na vzorcu 15 zadev, ki so bile odobrene pred začetkom veljavnosti spremembe Uredbe o ESPG iz leta 2009. 20 TABLE 3 RAZČLENITEV SREDSTEV ESPG GLEDE NA VRSTO PRILAGOJENIH UKREPOV V VSEH OSMIH REVIDIRANIH ZADEVAH ESPG Nokia Karmann Danfoss Odense Dell SR Technics AB Snaige „Construction“ DE DK IE LT EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR % Usposabljanje/ prekvalifikacija Spodbude za zaposlovanje 1 926 538 20 % 2 324 115 24 % 2 368 478 31 % Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče, na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje ter organov držav članic.
31 % 6 877 045 33 % 6 596 330 50 % 2 307 271 52 % 70 283 19 % 96 040 9% Job search assistance and general information 661 139 7% 1 126 894 12 % 100 256 1% 1 530 203 7% 192 412 1% 24 748 1% - - - - Employment and recruitment incentives - - - - - - 612 081 3% - - - - 17 073 5% 51 426 5% Supported employment and rehabilitation - - - - - - - - - - - - 136 407 37 % 450 720 43 % Entrepreneurship and start-up incentives 22 159 0% 7 198 0% 2 488 0% 1 369 129 7% 3 283 375 25 % 586 570 13 % 33 963 9% 322 552 31 % Othermeasures - - - - - - - - 218090 2% 27420 1% - - 661 0% Income support 7 117 315 73 % 6 076 406 64 % 5 294 117 68 % 10 485 906 50 % 2 940 682 22 % 1 464 435 33 % 109 457 30 % 135 123 13 % Total 9727151 100% 9534613 100% 7765339 100% 20874364 100% 13230889 100% 4410444 100% 367182 100% 1056480 100% Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
6 877 045 1 530 203 33 % 6 596 330 192 412 50 % 2 307 271 52 % 70 283 19 % 96 040 9% Pomoč pri iskanju zaposlitve in splošno informiranje 661 139 7% 1 126 894 12 % 100 256 1% 7% 1% 24 748 1% – – – – – – – – – – 612 081 3% – – – – 17 073 5% 51 426 5% Podporna zaposlitvi in rehabilitaciji – – – – – – – – – – – – 136 407 37 % 450 720 43 % Spodbude za podjetništvo in ustanavljanje podjetij 22 159 0% 7 198 0% 2 488 0% 1 369 129 7% 3 283 375 25 % 586 570 13 % 33 963 9% 322 552 31 % Drugiukrepi – – – – – – – – 218090 2% 27420 1% – – 661 0% Dohodkovna podpora 7 117 315 73 % 6 076 406 64 % 5 294 117 68 % 10 485 906 50 % 2 940 682 22 % 1 464 435 33 % 109 457 30 % 135 123 13 % Skupaj 9727151 100% 9534613 100% 7765339 100% 20874364 100% 13230889 100% 4410444 100% 367182 100% 1056480 100% Posebno poročilo št. 7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU?
Active measures 
Aktivni ukrepi
21 workErs’ IncomE support mEasurEs rEprEsEnt thE majorIty of thE co-fundEd ExpEndIturE for half of thE casEs audItEd 51. for each of the cases of the audited sample the court calculated the amounts of EGf funding committed to the different types of measures and in particular to workers’ income support (see Table 3). 
21 UKREPI DOHODKOVNE PODPORE ZA DELAVCE PRI POLOVICI REVIDIRANIH ZADEV POMENIJO VEČJI DEL SOFINANCIRANIH ODHODKOV 51. Sodišče je za vsako od zadev revidiranega vzorca izračunalo zneske sredstev ESPG, ki so bila dodeljena različnim vrstam ukrepov in zlasti dohodkovni podpori za delavce (glej tabelo 3).
52. in six of the eight cases shown in Table 3, the EGf packages included a relatively high proportion of income support. indeed, in Germany and denmark, one case in ireland and one in Lithuania, more than a third of the total value of the respective packages of personalised measures was composed of income support. 
52. V šestih od osmih zadev, ki so prikazane v tabeli 3, so svežnji ESPG vključevali relativno visok delež dohodkovne podpore. V Nemčiji in na Danskem ter v po eni zadevi na Irskem in v Litvi je namreč dohodkovna podpora pomenila več kot tretjino skupne vrednosti zadevnih svežnjev prilagojenih ukrepov.
53. in the particular cases audited in Germany and denmark, training measures meant to reskill or upskill redundant workers represented only a third or less of the respective EGf packages. on the other hand, income support measures in the form of unemployment benefits or the equivalent represented 50 % to 73 %. in those cases, moreover, the link between a redundant worker’s income support and his/her effective participation in an EGf-funded labour market measure such as training could not systematically be established. 
53. V posameznih revidiranih zadevah v Nemčiji in na Danskem so ukrepi usposabljanja, katerih namen je bil prekvalificiranje ali dokvalificiranje presežnih delavcev, predstavljali le tretjino zadevnih svežnjev ESPG ali manj, po drugi strani pa so ukrepi dohodkovne podpore v obliki nadomestil za brezposelnost ali enakovredne pomoči pomenili od 50 % do 73 %.
Globally, workErs’ IncomE support mEasurEs account for onE thIrd of rEfundEd costs 54. in the absence of a satisfactory EGf database of cases, the court examined the Member state application data collected by the commission for each of the 89 EGf cases for which information was available and relevant. it was found (see Table 4) that 33 % of EGf support for workers (thus excluding technical assistance to Member states) was composed of income support measures such as unemployment benefits. 
Ker ni zadovoljive podatkovne zbirke zadev ESPG, je Sodišče preučilo podatke o vlogah držav članic, ki jih je Komisija zbrala za vseh 89 zadev ESPG, za katere so bile na voljo ustrezne informacije. Ugotovljeno je bilo (glej tabelo 4), da so 33 % podpore ESPG za delavce (torej brez tehnične pomoči državam članicam) pomenili ukrepi dohodkovne podpore, kot so nadomestila za brezposelnost.
55. six Member states have been allocated 29 % of the total EGf co-financing and 89 % of all the income support measures approved to date. as well as Germany and denmark, the six included austria, italy, france and Malta28. 
55. 29 % doslej odobrenega skupnega sofinanciranja ESPG in 89 % vseh doslej odobrenih ukrepov dohodkovne podpore je bilo dodeljenih šestim državam članicam.
28 see also Table 4. 
28 Glej tudi tabelo 4.
56. the court also notes that the commission’s proposal for the next multiannual financial framework seeks to limit EGf support in the form of allowances, which include workers’ income support, to a maximum of 50 % of any EGf package29. 
56. Sodišče ugotavlja tudi, da si Komisija v svojem predlogu za naslednji večletni finančni okvir prizadeva omejiti podporo ESPG v obliki nadomestil, kar vključuje dohodkovno podporo za delavce, tako da bi pomenila največ 50 % posameznega svežnja ESPG29.
29 article 7(1) of coM(2011) 608 final. 
29 Člen 7(1) COM(2011) 608 final.
Source: Eca, based on commission data available for 89 approved applications. Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče, na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov Komisije za 89 odobrenih vlog. Posebno poročilo št. 7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU?
23 dIffErEnt EGf co-fundInG In sImIlar EconomIc cIrcumstancEs 57. the court notes inconsistent outcomes in similar economic circumstances with respect to workers’ income support measures in the case of Germany as compared to austria30, which are the two most intensive users of this kind of EGf support. 
23 RAZLIČNO SOFINANCIRANJE ESPG V PODOBNIH GOSPODARSKIH OKOLIŠČINAH 57. Sodišče opaža nedosledne rezultate v podobnih gospodarskih okoliščinah v zvezi z ukrepi dohodkovne podpore za delavce v Nemčiji in Avstriji30, ki sta največji uporabnici te vrste podpore ESPG.
Germany considered for EGf funding purposes that the duration of the training or qualification measures represents slightly less than half of workers’ normal working time31. 
Nemčija je za namene financiranja ESPG štela, da trajanje ukrepov usposabljanja ali kvalificiranja pomeni nekaj manj kot polovico običajnega delovnega časa delavcev31.
By contrast, austria considered that similar measures represented 100 % of the normal working time. this is due to the fact that the austrian short-term allowance scheme provides for a definition of full-time occupation to be as low as 50 % of the normal working time. 
Avstrija pa je za podobne ukrepe štela, da pomenijo 100 % običajnega delovnega časa.
61. after having established the average length of the approval procedure, the court assessed to what extent it can be made shorter taking into account the different legal provisions and rules to be respected. 
61. Sodišče je po tem, ko je določilo povprečno trajanje postopka odobritve, ocenilo, koliko ga je mogoče skrajšati ob upoštevanju različnih pravnih določb in pravil, ki jih je treba spoštovati.
30 steiermark case. 31 this rate was a coefficient calculated on the basis of a telephone survey that was conducted for the nokia application. the coefficient was subsequently applied to all other EGf cases in Germany. 
30 Zadeva Steiermark. 31 Ta stopnja je količnik, izračunan na podlagi telefonske ankete, ki je bila izvedena za vlogo v zvezi z zadevo Nokia.
62. the EGf approval procedure is the process from the moment a Member state officially applies until the commission and the budgetary authority commit the financial contribution to an EGf case. it can be divided into consecutive stages (called later assessment procedure, budgetary procedure and empowerment procedure), which last together on average 41 weeks. 
62. Postopek odobritve ESPG je proces, ki traja od trenutka, ko država članica uradno odda vlogo, do takrat, ko Komisija in proračunski organ zadevi ESPG dodelita finančni prispevek. Postopek je mogoče razdeliti v zaporedne faze (imenovane postopek ocenjevanja, proračunski postopek in postopek pooblastitve), ki skupaj v povprečju trajajo 41 tednov.
24 Graph schEmatIsEd VIEw of thE EGf approVal procEdurE Member State Applies to Commission Submits proposal to Budgetary authority Approves EGF support Commission Decides to pay Member State Assessment procedure Appraisal and drafting of proposal and internal consultations procedure 30 weeks Budgetary procedure 7 weeks Total: 41 weeks Empowerment procedure 4 weeks Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
24 DIAGRAM SHEMATSKI PRIKAZ POSTOPKA ODOBRITVE ESPG država članica odda vlogo Komisija predloži predlog proračunskemu organu, ki odobri podporo ESPG Komisija se odloči plačati državi članici postopek ocenjevanja ocena in priprava predloga ter postopek internih posvetovanj 30 tednov proračunski postopek 7 tednov skupaj: 41 tednov postopek pooblastitve 4 tedni Posebno poročilo št. 7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU?
25 thE assEssmEnt procEdurE could bE shortEnEd 63. the assessment procedure is composed of the appraisal procedure and the commission’s internal consultation procedures leading to the adoption of the proposal for a decision by the budgetary authority. it takes on average 30 weeks. 
25 POSTOPEK OCENJEVANJA BI BILO MOGOČE SKRAJŠATI 63. Postopek ocenjevanja je sestavljen iz ocene ter postopkov internega posvetovanja Komisije, ki vodijo k sprejetju predloga sklepa proračunskega organa.
64. the appraisal procedure takes on average 15 weeks when taking as a starting point the date of the official application of the Member state, but it is much longer when taking into account the informal exchange of information between the responsible Member state authority and the commission. 
64. Ocena v povprečju traja 15 tednov od datuma uradne oddaje vloge države članice, če upoštevamo neformalne izmenjave informacij med pristojnim organom države članice in Komisijo pa je ta postopek še veliko daljši.
67. the empowerment procedure then completes the approval procedure, leading to the adoption of the formal decision to pay a financial contribution. its length, an average of 4 weeks, is closely linked to the provisions of the commission’s rules of procedure33. finally, once agreed, the financial contribution is paid to the Member state concerned. 
67. Postopek odobritve se zaključi s postopkom pooblastitve, ki vodi k sprejetju uradnega sklepa o plačilu finančnega prispevka. Trajanje postopka pooblastitve je v povprečju 4 tedne, kar je tesno povezano z določbami poslovnika Komisije33.
32 paragraph 28 of the interinstitutional agreement between the European parliament, the council and the commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, 2006/c 139/01. 
32 Odstavek 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (2006/C 139/01).
33 see articles 13 to 15 of the commission’s rules of procedure (c(2000) 3614 of 8 december 2000), as amended by commission decision 2010/138/Euratom of 24 february 2010 (oJ L 55, 5.3.2010, p. 
33 Glej člene od 13 do 15 poslovnika Komisije (C(2000) 3614 z dne 8. decembra 2000), kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Komisije 2010/138/Euratom z dne 24. februarja 2010 (UL L 55, 5.3.2010, str.
26 thE EGf approVal procEdurE Is not tImEly 68. to conclude, the approval procedure is very long, especially considering that the EGf is supposed to be an emergency fund. in the mid-term evaluation report, evaluators already pointed out to the commission in 2011 that the long EGf approval procedure could be considered too slow to offer a genuinely ‘rapid response’ mechanism in times of crisis. 
26 TRAJANJE POSTOPKA ODOBRITVE ESPG JE NEPRIMERNO DOLGOTRAJNO 68. Postopek odobritve je zelo dolgotrajen, zlasti če upoštevamo, da naj bi bil ESPG sklad za nujne primere. Ocenjevalci so Komisijo že v poročilu o vmesni oceni leta 2011 opozorili na to, da je dolgotrajen postopek odobritve ESPG morda prepočasen, da bi lahko zagotavljal pravi mehanizem „hitrega odzivanja“ v kriznih časih.
69. the length of the entire approval procedure is of an average of 11 weeks longer than for an ordinary financing decision of the commission. 
69. Celoten postopek odobritve je v povprečju 11 tednov daljši od običajnega postopka Komisije za sprejetje sklepa o financiranju.
71. furthermore, not one audited or surveyed Member state authority expressed dissatisfaction with respect to the commission service responsible for the EGf, but pointed instead to issues concerning the EGf procedure as a whole rather than the quality of support. 
Sodišče je namreč v vseh osmih revidiranih zadevah našlo zadostne dokaze o uspešni podpori državam članicam. 71. Poleg tega ni niti eden od revidiranih ali anketiranih organov držav članic izrazil nezadovoljstva s službo Komisije, ki je odgovorna za ESPG.
27 CoNCluSIoNS aNd rECommENdatIoNS 72. the court is aware of the need to show Eu solidarity towards workers affected by redundancies resulting from changes in world trade patterns. 
27 ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 72. Sodišče se zaveda potrebe po izkazovanju solidarnosti EU z delavci, ki jih je prizadelo odpuščanje presežnih delavcev, ki je posledica sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih.
However, the court is not convinced that all the features of the current EGf mechanism are the most appropriate to deliver specific support with Eu added value to redundant workers. nEarly all ElIGIblE workErs wErE offErEd pErsonalIsEd and wEll-coordInatEd mEasurEs 73. nearly all eligible workers could benefit from personalised EGf measures. 
Ni pa prepričano, da so vsi elementi sedanjega mehanizma ESPG najprimernejši za zagotavljanje specifične podpore za odpuščene delavce z dodano vrednostjo EU. SKORAJ VSEM UPRAVIČENIM DELAVCEM SO BILI ZAGOTOVLJENI PRILAGOJENI IN DOBRO USKLAJENI UKREPI 73. Prilagojene ukrepe ESPG so lahko koristili skoraj vsi upravičeni delavci.
However, in some cases redundant workers formerly employed by the suppliers of an affected enterprise were not included in EGf support (paragraphs 14 to 18). 
Toda v nekaterih primerih presežni delavci, ki so bili prej zaposleni pri dobaviteljih prizadetega podjetja, niso bili vključeni v podporo ESPG (odstavki od 14 do 18).
74. in general, EGf support was well coordinated with Esf and national labour market measures, in that existing measures were complemented by additional EGf measures specifically designed to address workers’ needs (paragraphs 19 to 21). 
74. Podpora ESPG je bila na splošno dobro usklajena z ukrepi ESS in nacionalnimi ukrepi na trgu dela, pri čemer so dodatni ukrepi ESPG, ki so bili zasnovani posebej za izpolnitev potreb delavcev, dopolnjevali obstoječe ukrepe (odstavki od 19 do 21).
28 rEcommEndatIon 1 In order to improve the quality of the information on the achievements of the different cases and on the effectiveness of measures supporting redundant workers, the member States and the Commission should take the necessary steps to ensure the availability of up-to-date and reliable data in order to monitor the achievement of objectives, as well as to compare the outcome of the various measures. onE thIrd of EGf fundInG compEnsatEs natIonal workErs’ IncomE support schEmEs, wIth no Eu addEd ValuE 77. 
7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU? 28 PRIPOROČILO 1 Države članice in Komisija bi za izboljšanje kakovosti informacij o dosežkih različnih zadev in uspešnosti ukrepov, ki podpirajo presežne delavce, morale sprejeti potrebne ukrepe, da se zagotovi razpoložljivost posodobljenih in zanesljivih podatkov za spremljanje doseganja ciljev in primerjavo rezultatov različnih ukrepov.