natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
An evaluation of the income effect of direct support have been published in 2011 and the Commission is currently undertaking an external evaluation on the structural effects of the direct support which will examine the effect of direct support schemes, including SAPS, on different aspects of farm structure.10 The evaluation is planned to be completed in autumn 2013. 
Leta 2011 je bilo objavljeno ovrednotenje učinka neposredne podpore na dohodek in Komisija trenutno izvaja zunanje ocenjevanje strukturnih učinkov na neposredno podporo, v okviru katerega bo pregledan učinek shem neposredne podpore, vključno s SEPP, na različne vidike strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev10. Načrtuje se, da bo vrednotenje končano jeseni leta 2013.
SAPS being a transitional scheme to SPS, its effects are assessed together with the SPS in the framework of those evaluations. 
Ker je SEPP shema prehoda na SEP, so v okviru teh vrednotenj njeni učinki ocenjeni skupaj s SEP.
In addition, other CAP instruments such as rural development support and farm advisory system are available to farmers to help tackling most of the issues mentioned by the Court. 
Poleg tega so kmetom za pomoč pri reševanju večine vprašanj, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, na voljo drugi instrumenti SKP, kot npr. podpora za razvoj podeželja in sistem kmetijskega svetovanja.
Those measures are designed and chosen by the Member States among a wide range of possibilities to fit their needs in terms of farm modernisation, training of employees, etc. On the land policy itself, ownerships and fragmentation, the action of the Commission is reduced as it is not in its field of competencies. 
Države članice so zasnovale in izbrale te ukrepe med številnimi možnostmi za zadostitev svojih potreb glede kmetijske modernizacije, usposabljanja zaposlenih itd. Glede zemljiške politike same, lastništev in raz-drobitev je ukrepanje Komisije omejeno, saj to ne spada med njene pristojnosti.
By providing an effective income insurance and minimum stability of revenue SAPS support helps farmers to mitigate adverse effects of such structural factors. 
Podpora iz SEPP z zagotavljanjem učinkovitega zavarovanja dohodka in minimalne stabilnosti prihodkov kmetom pomaga ublažiti neugodne učinke takšnih strukturnih dejavnikov.
10 In particular, the evaluation should examine the impacts of direct support on farm structures (size, number, land use, livestock numbers), maintenance of farming in marginal areas, impacts on labour force, capital and farm business strategies. Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
10 V okviru vrednotenja je treba zlasti pregledati učinke neposredne podpore na strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev (velikost, številka, raba zemljišča, število živine), ohranjanje kmetovanja v območjih z mejno donosnostjo, učinke na delovno silo, kapital in poslovne strategije kmetovanja. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
The Commission does not fully share the Court’s view. 
Komisija se ne strinja v celoti z mnenjem Sodišča.
The external study on land markets indicates the level of the capitalisation varies among countries and regions as a result of differences in their land market structure. 
Zunanja študija o zemljiških trgih je pokazala, da se raven kapitalizacije razlikuje med državami in regijami, kar je posledica razlik v njihovih strukturah zemljiških trgov.
Since the ‘subsidy’ effect influences not only input but also the output prices, impacts on the profitability of farming is not uniform and difficult to assess. 
Ker učinek „subvencije“ ne vpliva zgolj na cene surovin, temveč tudi na izhodne cene, učinki na donosnost kmetovanja niso enaki in jih je težko oceniti.
If SAPS are capitalised in the value of land, and the farmer is a landowner, any capitalisation of the SAPS directly increases the value of his/her assets. 
Če je SEPP kapitalizirana v vrednosti zemljišča in je kmet lastnik zemljišča, vsaka taka kapitalizacija neposredno poveča vrednost kmetovega premoženja.
On the other hand, if a farmer rents the land, SAPS payments would compensate for any capitalisation on land rentals and at most be neutral compared to a situation without SAPS. 
Po drugi strani pa bi plačila iz SEPP nadomestila kapitalizacije najemov zemljišč in bi bila kvečjemu nevtralna v primerjavi s položajem brez SEPP, če kmet najame zemljišče.
Furthermore, it should be recalled that many operators who rent out their land are themselves farmers. 
Poleg tega je treba upoštevati, da je veliko izvajalcev, ki svoje zemljišče dajejo v najem, tudi samih kmetov.
The Commission has analysed the impact of the support on land prices (just to mention a few — Impact assessment under the Health check, impact assessment for CAP 2020 proposals and an external study on land market in EU have been commissioned at the Commission’s initiative). 
Komisija je analizirala učinek podpore na cene zemljišč (naj omenimo samo nekatere analize: ocena učinka v okviru pregleda stanja, ocena učinka za predloge o SKP 2020 ter zunanja študija o zemljiških trgih v EU, ki je bila naročena na pobudo Komisije).
This has been in particular assessed in a study ordered by Commission services11. 
To je bilo zlasti ocenjeno v študiji, ki so jo naročile službe Komisije11.
Indeed, developments in land prices are the result of a complex interplay of a variety of influencing factors, and the agricultural support system is only one among them. 
Razvoji v cenah zemljišč so dejansko rezultat kompleksnega medsebojnega delovanja različnih dejavnikov vpliva, pri čemer je sistem kmetijske podpore le eden izmed njih.
Caution is therefore needed when drawing conclusions of the exact effect of the SAPS system on the price of agricultural land. 
Zato je treba o natančnem učinku sistema SEPP na ceno kmetijskega zemljišča sklepati previdno.
Box 3 Land policy is not an EU competency. 
Okvir 3 Zemljiška politika ni v pristojnosti EU.
Furthermore, the Commission has no right to intervene on private arrangements resulting from negotiations between farmers and owners. 
Poleg tega Komisija nima pravice posegati v zasebne dogovore, ki so jih z medsebojnimi pogajanji dosegli kmeti in lastniki.
11 StudyontheFunctioningofLandMarketsintheEUMemberStates under the Influence of Measures Applied under the common agricultural policy, 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/landmarkets/ index_en.htm REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 61. 
11 StudyontheFunctioningofLandMarketsintheEUMemberStates under the Influence of Measures Applied under the common agricultural policy, 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/landmarkets/ index_en.htm ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 61.
The extension of SAPS was a result of the request of the new Member States on the political level. 
Razširitev SEPP je bila izvedena na zahtevo novih držav članic na politični ravni.
According to the Treaty of Accession, the SAPS was available for the new Member States until the end of 2006 with the possibility of renewal twice by one year (until the end of 2008) at the request of the new Member States on the political level. 
V skladu s pristopno pogodbo je bila SEPP novim državam članicam na voljo do konca leta 2006 z možnostjo dvakratne obnovitve za obdobje enega leta (do konca leta 2008) na zahtevo novih držav članic na politični ravni.
Regulation 73/2009 in Article 122(3) established that SAPS must be available until 31 December 2013. 
V členu 122(3) Uredbe št. 73/2009 je določeno, da mora biti SEPP na voljo do 31. decembra 2013.
It follows that with new CAP SAPS will cease to exist and new Member States have been aware of this condition already since January 2009 when the regulation was published. 
Iz tega sledi, da bo SEPP po novi SKP prenehala obstajati, česar se nove države članice zavedajo že od objave Uredbe januarja 2009.
SAPS has never been presented as a permanent scheme but as a derogation from the EU scheme available to the new Member States before their transfer to the SPS. 
SEPP ni bila nikoli predstavljena kot trajna shema, temveč kot odstopanje od sheme EU, ki je bila na voljo novim državam članicam pred njihovim prehodom na SEP.
New Member States have every year the option to terminate application of SAPS and introduce the standard EU scheme. 
Nove države članice imajo vsako leto možnost, da prenehajo izvajati SEPP in uvedejo standardno shemo EU.
Discussions and several technical consultations were held between the Commission and authorities of new Member States who had considered the introduction of SPS in the past. 
Med Komisijo in organi novih držav članic, ki so bili v preteklosti naklonjeni uvedbi SEP, so potekale razprave in več strokovnih posvetovanj.
It is however the responsibility of the new MS to judge advantages and disadvantages of such a decision to terminate SAPS and to set up appropriate administrative structures according to the EU legislation. 
Vendar je naloga novih držav članic, da presodijo prednosti in slabosti odločitve o prenehanju izvajanja SEPP ter da oblikujejo ustrezne upravne strukture v skladu z zakonodajo EU.
It follows that with the new CAP, SAPS will cease to exist and new Member States have been aware of this condition already since January 2009 when the regulation was published. 
Iz tega sledi, da bo SEPP po novi SKP prenehala obstajati, česar se nove države članice zavedajo že od objave Uredbe januarja 2009.
It is the responsibility of Member States to take a timely decision on the implementation of the SPS. 
Naloga držav članic je, da pravočasno sprejmejo odločitev o izvajanju SEP.
See also reply to paragraph 64. Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
Glej tudi odgovor na točko 64. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
The distribution of SAPS among farmers does reflect farm structural characteristics — and it is proportional to farmers’ contribution to the maintenance of area in GAEC, thus contributes to the protection of natural resources and therefore provides the basis for the delivery of public goods through agriculture. 
Razdeljevanje pomoči iz SEPP med kmete dejansko odraža kmetijske strukturne značilnosti in je sorazmerno s prispevanjem kmetov k obdelovanju površine v skladu z GAEC, s čimer prispeva k zaščiti naravnih virov in tako določa podlago za zagotavljanje javnih dobrin s kmetijstvom.
As for the SPS, there is no quantified link between SAPS support and costs incurred by farming activity including provision of public goods. 
V zvezi s SEP ne obstaja nobena količinsko določena povezava med podporo iz SEPP in stroški, nastalimi pri kmetijski dejavnosti, vključno z zagotavljanjem javnih dobrin.
Member States who wanted to differentiate the level of payments between regions, could have done so by introducing the SPS or since 2010 through the specific aid. 
Države članice, ki so želele različne ravni plačil med regijami, bi lahko to storile z uvedbo SEP ali od leta 2010 s posebno pomočjo.
An evaluation of the income effect of direct support have been published in 2011 and the Commission is currently undertaking an external evaluation on the structural effects of the direct support which will examine the effect of direct support schemes, including SAPS, on different aspects of farm structure. 
Leta 2011 je bilo objavljeno ovrednotenje učinka neposredne podpore na dohodek in Komisija trenutno izvaja zunanje ocenjevanje strukturnih učinkov na neposredno podporo, v okviru katerega bo pregledan učinek shem neposredne podpore, vključno s SEPP, na različne vidike strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev.
The Commission services are available for consultations and assistance if there is a need and upon a request from the Member State interested. 
Službe Komisije so na zahtevo zainteresirane države članice na voljo za posvetovanja in pomoč, če je to potrebno.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 68. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 68.
The definition of agricultural activity reflects the objective of promoting farmers’ market orientation while ensuring compliance with the WTO ‘green box’ rules. 
Opredelitev kmetijske dejavnosti odraža cilj spodbujanja tržne usmerjenosti kmetov, obenem pa zagotavlja skladnost s pravili „zelene škatle“ STO.
When discussing further targeting of direct support, during the Health Check the Council considered that flexibility should be given to Member States to consider, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and according to their specific economic realities, which are the right parameters to be taken into account for the application of the possibility to exclude from direct payments ‘natural or legal persons whose agricultural activities form only an insignificant part of their overall economic activities or whose principal business or company objects do not consist of exercising an agricultural activity’. 
Svet je v razpravah o nadaljnjem usmerjanju neposredne podpore med pregledom stanja menil, da bi bilo treba državam članicam v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti in glede na njihove specifične gospodarske razmere omogočiti prožnost pri presoji, katere parametre bodo upoštevale pri uporabi možnosti, da iz neposrednih plačil izključijo „fizične ali pravne osebe, katerih kmetijske dejavnosti predstavljajo le majhen delež vseh gospodarskih dejavnosti ali katerih glavna dejavnost ali dejavnost družbe ni opravljanje kmetijske dejavnosti“.
Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
Common reply to recommendation 1 and 2 Criteria such as ‘concrete and regular agricultural activity’ could link the level of support to the performance of the beneficiary of an actual production obligation which would not be compatible neither with the CAP targets for achieving greater market orientation through decoupled direct payments, nor with the WTO ‘green box’ conditions. 
Skupni odgovor na priporočili 1 in 2 Merila, kot na primer „konkretna in redna kmetijska dejavnost“, bi lahko raven podpore povezala z izpolnjevanjem dejanske zaveze za proizvodnjo s strani upravičenca, ki ne bi bila združljiva s cilji SKP za doseganje večje tržne usmerjenosti z nevezanimi neposrednimi plačili niti s pogoji „zelene škatle“ STO.
See reply to recommendation 3. 
Glej odgovor na priporočilo 3.
Recommendation 3 The Commission’s legislative proposals aim at a more balanced distribution of aid through several measures such as progressive reduction and capping of direct payments, flexibility between pillars, regional allocation of national ceilings, convergence of the value of payment entitlements and small farmers scheme. 
Priporočilo 3 Cilj zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije je bolj uravnoteženo razdeljevanje pomoči z več ukrepi, kot so postopno zmanjševanje in omejitev neposrednih plačil, prožnost med stebri, regionalna dodelitev nacionalnih zgornjih mej, konvergenca vrednosti pravic do plačila in shema za male kmete.
Under the new policy, all Member States (including current SAPS countries) will have the option to regionalise the payments taking into account agronomic and economic characteristics and their regional agricultural potential. 
V skladu z novo politiko bodo imele vse države članice (vključno z državami, ki trenutno uporabljajo SEPP) možnost za regionalizacijo plačil ob upoštevanju agronomskih in gospodarskih značilnosti ter njihovega regionalnega kmetijskega potenciala.
An evaluation of the income effect of direct support has been published in 2011 and the Commission is currently undertaking an external evaluation on the structural effects of the direct support which will examine the effect of direct support schemes, including SAPS, on different aspects of farm structure.12 The evaluation is planned to be completed in autumn 2013. 
Leta 2011 je bilo objavljeno ovrednotenje učinka neposredne podpore na dohodek in Komisija trenutno izvaja zunanje ocenjevanje strukturnih učinkov na neposredno podporo, v okviru katerega bo pregledan učinek shem neposredne podpore, vključno s SEPP, na različne vidike strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev12. Načrtuje se, da bo vrednotenje končano jeseni leta 2013.
12 In particular, the evaluation should examine the impacts of direct support on farm structures (size, number, land use, livestock numbers), maintenance of farming in marginal areas, impacts on labour force, capital and farm business strategies. 
12 V okviru vrednotenja je treba zlasti pregledati učinke neposredne podpore na strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev (velikost, številka, raba zemljišča, število živine), ohranjanje kmetovanja v območjih z mejno donosnostjo, učinke na delovno silo, kapital in poslovne strategije kmetovanja.
The issue is addressed in the Commission proposals for the CAP towards 2020 through the definition of an active farmer and of agricultural activity. 
To vprašanje je obravnavano v predlogih Komisije o SKP do leta 2020 z opredelitvijo aktivnega kmeta in kmetijske dejavnosti.
The possibility to regionalise SAPS payments does not exist as SAPS is a transitory scheme towards SPS regional payments. 
Regionalizacija plačil iz SEPP ni mogoča, ker je SEPP shema prehoda na regionalna plačila SEP.
Besides, measures under rural development programmes (LFA payments) exist to support disadvantaged regions. 
Poleg tega za podporo prikrajšanih regij obstajajo ukrepi v okviru programov za razvoj podeželja (plačila za območja z omejenimi možnostmi).
Recommendation 4 The issue of land prices has been analysed in a study on the functioning of land markets13, in the CAP Health Check — Impact Assessment14, and a further study on market factors is currently under way in the RTD 7th Framework Programme15. 
Priporočilo 4 Vprašanje o cenah zemljišč je bilo analizirano v študiji o delovanju zemljiških trgov13, v pregledu stanja SKP – ocena učinka14, trenutno pa v okviru 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj poteka dodatna študija o tržnih dejavnikih15.
Besides, an evaluation by the Commission is ongoing as regards the impact of direct support on farm structures. 
Poleg tega Komisija trajno izvaja vrednotenje v zvezi z učinkom neposredne podpore na strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev.
As regards the tools offered, SAPS support helps farmers to mitigate adverse effects of the structural weaknesses by providing an effective income insurance and minimum stability of revenue. 
V zvezi s ponujenimi orodji podpora iz SEPP z zagotavljanjem učinkovitega zavarovanja dohodka in minimalno stabilnostjo prihodka kmetom pomaga ublažiti neugodne učinke strukturnih slabosti.
In addition, other CAP instruments such as rural development support and farm advisory system are available to farmers to help tackle most of the issues mentioned by the Court. 
Poleg tega so kmetom za pomoč pri reševanju večine vprašanj, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, na voljo drugi instrumenti SKP, kot npr. podpora za razvoj podeželja in sistem kmetijskega svetovanja.
Those measures are designed and chosen by the Member States among a wide range of possibilities to fit their needs in terms of farm modernisation, training of employees, etc. SAPS support helps farmers to mitigate adverse effects of such structural factors. 
Države članice so zasnovale in izbrale te ukrepe med številnimi možnostmi za zadostitev svojih potreb glede kmetijske modernizacije, usposabljanja zaposlenih itd. Podpora iz SEPP kmetom pomaga ublažiti neugodne učinke takšnih strukturnih dejavnikov.
13 StudyontheFunctioningofLandMarketsintheEUMemberStates under the Influence of Measures Applied under the common agricultural policy, Final report November 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/ analysis/external/landmarkets/index_en.htm; 14 CAPHEALTHCHECK—IMPACTASSESSMENTNOTEN°1http://ec.europa. eu/agriculture/healthcheck/ia_annex/c1_en.pdf; 15 Comparative Analysis of Factor Markets for Agriculture across the Member States, http://cordis.europa.eu/search/index.cfm?fuseaction=proj. document&PJ_RCN=11351201 REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 75. 
13 StudyontheFunctioningofLandMarketsintheEUMemberStates under the Influence of Measures Applied under the Common Agricultural Policy (Študija o delovanju zemljiških trgov v državah članicah EU pod vplivom ukrepov, ki se izvajajo v okviru skupne kmetijske politike), končno poročilo, november 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/ landmarkets/index_en.htm. 14 CAPHEALTHCHECK–IMPACTASSESSMENTNOTEN°1(Pregledstanja SKP – dokument o oceni učinka št. 1) http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/ healthcheck/ia_annex/c1_en.pdf.
It is the responsibility of Member States to take a decision on implementation of the SPS and to request consultation from the Commission. 
Naloga držav članic je, da sprejmejo odločitev o izvajanju SEP in od Komisije zahtevajo posvetovanje.
The Commission has to respect the subsidiarity principle and cannot intervene in the Member States’ competences. 
Komisija mora spoštovati načelo subsidiarnosti in ne sme posegati v pristojnosti držav članic.
See also reply to recommendation 5. 
Glej tudi odgovor na priporočilo 5.
Recommendation 5 It is the responsibility of Member States to take a decision on implementation of the SPS and to request consultation from the Commission. 
Priporočilo 5 Naloga držav članic je, da sprejmejo odločitev o izvajanju SEP in od Komisije zahtevajo posvetovanje.
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 16/2012 The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2012 — 51 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-921-6 doi:10.2865/27543 
Evropsko računsko sodišče Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2012 – 51 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-936-0 doi:10.2865/31053
THE SINGLE AREA PAYMENT SCHEME IS A SIMPLIFIED TRANSITIONAL INCOME SUPPORT SCHEME FOR FARMERS IN THE NEW MEMBER STATES. 
SHEMA ENOTNEGA PLAČILA NA POVRŠINO JE POENOSTAVLJENA PREHODNA SHEMA DOHODKOVNE PODPORE ZA KMETE V NOVIH DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH.
THE COURT RECOMMENDS THAT THE SUPPORT BE DIRECTED TO THE ACTIVE FARMER WHO CONDUCTS CONCRETE AND REGULAR AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES AS WELL AS A MORE BALANCED DISTRIBUTION OF AID BETWEEN FARMERS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE FARMS IN THE DIFFERENT REGIONS. 
SODIŠČE PRIPOROČA, NAJ BO DOHODKOVNA PODPORA USMERJENA V AKTIVNE KMETE, KI DEJANSKO IZVAJAJO REDNE KMETIJSKE DEJAVNOSTI, IN NAJ BO RAZDELJEVANJE POMOČI MED KMETE BOLJ URAVNOTEŽENO Z UPOŠTEVANJEM SPECIFIČNEGA POLOŽAJA KMETIJ V RAZLIČNIH REGIJAH.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-12-016-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJ-AB-12-016-SL-C
Special Report No 20 2012 ISSN 1831-0834 
Posebno poročilo št.
Special Report No 20 2012 IS STRUCTURAL MEASURES FUNDING FOR MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS EFFECTIVE IN HELPING MEMBER STATES ACHIEVE EU WASTE POLICY OBJECTIVES? (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 20 2012 ALI FINANCIRANJE PROJEKTOV ZA IZGRADNJO OBJEKTOV ZA GOSPODARJENJE S KOMUNALNIMI ODPADKI V OKVIRU STRUKTURNIH UKREPOV USPEŠNO POMAGA DRŽAVAM ČLANICAM PRI DOSEGANJU CILJEV POLITIKE EU GLEDE GOSPODARJENJA Z ODPADKI? (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Fax +352 4398-46410 E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://eca.europa.eu Special Report No 20 2012 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: eca-info@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.