natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This risk can be reduced by careful design of scheme rules by Member States e.g. requiring that eligible fishing vessels have been at sea for a minimum number of days or that the fishing vessel is active before the application. 
To tveganje se lahko zmanjša tako, da države članice skrbno določijo pravila sheme, na primer tako, da zahtevajo, da morajo biti upravičena ribiška plovila na morju minimalno število dni ali da je ribiško plovilo pred oddajo vloge aktivno.
The Court found that this risk was not avoided. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da to tveganje ni bilo preprečeno.
In France, one of the eligibility conditions for public aid for fishing vessel decommissioning was that the vessel had to have a valid navigation licence at the time of the public aid decision. 
V Franciji je bil eden od pogojev za upravičenost do javne pomoči za umik ribiškega plovila iz obratovanja, da ima plovilo veljavno dovoljenje za plovbo v času sprejetja odločitve o javni pomoči.
This condition was not fulfilled for one of the 10 projects audited (see Box 6). 
Ta pogoj pri enem od desetih revidiranih projektov ni bil izpolnjen (glej okvir 6).
30 BOX 6 DECOMMISSIONING AN INACTIVE FISHING VESSEL IN FRANCE The French authorities accepted in June 2008 the application for public aid for decommissioning a fishing vessel with its navigation licence having expired in July 2006. 
30 OKVIR 6 UMIK NEAKTIVNEGA RIBIŠKEGA PLOVILA IZ OBRATOVANJA V FRANCIJI Francoski organi so junija 2008 sprejeli vlogo za javno pomoč za umik ribiškega plovila iz obratovanja skupaj z njegovim dovoljenjem za plovbo, ki je poteklo julija 2006.
The fishing vessel was inactive throughout 2007, because it would have required major refitting in order to be able to obtain the navigation licence. 
Ribiško plovilo je bilo v celotnem letu 2007 neaktivno, saj bi ga bilo treba močno prenoviti, da bi lahko ponovno dobilo dovoljenje za plovbo.
Decommissioning aid of 1 284 534 euro was paid, of which 513 813 euro was funded by the EFF. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Izplačana je bila pomoč za umik iz obratovanja v višini 1 284 534 EUR, od tega je 513 813 EUR prispeval ESR. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
In Spain, one of the eligibility conditions for aid for fishing vessel decommissioning was that the fishing vessel must either have been fishing for at least 90 days in each of the two years before the application date or must have been fishing for at least 120 days in the year before the application date. 
V Španiji je bil eden od pogojev za upravičenost do pomoči za umik ribiškega plovila iz obratovanja, da je moralo plovilo bodisi izvajati ribolov vsaj 90 dni v vsakem od dveh let pred datumom oddaje vloge za pomoč, ali pa je moralo izvajati ribolov vsaj 120 dni v letu pred datumom oddaje vloge za pomoč.
Two of the 10 projects audited concern vessels which were inactive although, in the first case, the above eligibility condition was fulfilled (see Box 7). 
Dva od desetih revidiranih projektov se nanašata na neaktivni plovili, čeprav je bil v prvem primeru izpolnjen zgoraj navedeni pogoj za upravičenost (glej okvir 7).
31 BOX 7 DECOMMISSIONING INACTIVE FISHING VESSELS IN SPAIN (a) The Spanish authorities accepted an application of June 2008 for the decommissioning of a fishing vessel which was inactive since September 2007 following a severe fire which occurred while the vessel was in South America. 
31 OKVIR 7 UMIK NEAKTIVNEGA RIBIŠKEGA PLOVILA IZ OBRATOVANJA V ŠPANIJI (a) Španski organi so junija 2008 sprejeli vlogo za umik ribiškega plovila iz obratovanja. Plovilo je bilo neaktivno od septembra 2007 po hudem požaru, ki se je zgodil, ko je bilo plovilo v Južni Ameriki.
The beneficiary provided evidence that the vessel had been fishing for over 120 days in the year before the application date. 
Upravičenec je predložil dokaze, da je plovilo izvajalo ribolov več kot 120 dni v letu pred datumom oddaje vloge za pomoč.
The fishing vessel was scrapped in Uruguay. 
Ribiško plovilo je bilo dano v razrez v Urugvaju.
Decommissioning aid of 1 611 641 euro was paid, of which 983 101 euro was funded by the EFF. (b) The Spanish authorities accepted an application of July 2008 for the decommissioning of a fishing vessel which was inactive since May 2007. 
Izplačana je bila pomoč za umik iz obratovanja v višini 1 611 641 EUR, od tega je 983 101 EUR prispeval ESR. (b) Španski organi so julija 2008 sprejeli vlogo za umik ribiškega plovila, ki je bilo neaktivno od maja 2007, iz obratovanja.
The beneficiary provided evidence that the vessel had been fishing for over 120 days in 2006, but did not provide evidence that the vessel was active in 2007, the year before the application date. 
Upravičenec je predložil dokaze, da je plovilo v letu 2006 izvajalo ribolov več kot 120 dni, vendar ni predložil dokazov, da je bilo aktivno v letu 2007, se pravi v letu pred datumom oddaje vloge za pomoč.
Decommissioning aid of 780 794 euro was paid, of which 468 477 euro was funded by the EFF. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Izplačana je bila pomoč za umik iz obratovanja v višini 780 794 EUR, od tega je 468 477 EUR prispeval ESR. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
In the United Kingdom, in order to be eligible for the fishing vessel decommissioning scheme operated in England, a fishing vessel had to have a fishing licence and be seaworthy. 
V Združenem kraljestvu je bilo v okviru sheme za umik iz obratovanja, ki se je izvajala v Angliji, ribiško plovilo upravičeno, če je imelo dovoljenje za gospodarski ribolov in je bilo usposobljeno za plovbo.
These conditions were not fulfilled for two of the 10 projects audited (see Box 8). insufficient justification for rates of public aid 59. 
Ta pogoja pri dveh od desetih revidiranih projektov nista bila izpolnjena (glej okvir 8). nezadoStna utemeljitev Stopenj javne pomoči 59.
Establishing the level of public aid for fishing vessel decommissioning schemes is one of the key factors affecting the outcome and cost of the scheme: if rates are set too low, there may be insufficient participants in the scheme; if rates are too high, the public costs may be inflated and the available budget will be absorbed by fewer fishing vessels. 
Določitev ravni javne pomoči za sheme za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja je eden od ključnih dejavnikov, ki vpliva na rezultat in stroške sheme: če so stopnje določene prenizko, bo morda premalo zainteresiranih za shemo, če so določene previsoko, pa je lahko javna poraba visoka in razpoložljiva sredstva bodo porabljena za manj ribiških plovil.
The EFF regulation provides that Member States may consider the cost effectiveness of aid rates on the basis of objective criteria, such as the market or insurance value of the fishing vessel, its turnover, its age and fishing capacity. 
Uredba o ESR določa, da lahko države članice razmislijo o stroškovni učinkovitosti stopenj pomoči na podlagi objektivnih meril, kot so tržna ali zavarovalna vrednost ribiškega plovila, njegov promet, starost in ribolovna zmogljivost.
32 BOX 8 DECOMMISSIONING INACTIVE FISHING VESSELS IN ENGLAND (a) The English authorities received in January 2009 an application for the decommissioning of a fishing vessel, the licence of which had been transferred by the applicant to another of his vessels in July 2008. 
32 OKVIR 8 UMIK NEAKTIVNEGA RIBIŠKEGA PLOVILA IZ OBRATOVANJA V ANGLIJI (a) Angleški organi so januarja 2009 prejeli vlogo za umik ribiškega plovila iz obratovanja. Njegovo dovoljenje za gospodarski ribolov je vlagatelj julija 2008 prenesel na eno od svojih drugih plovil.
Following the advice of the English authorities, the vessel was licensed again for 9 days before the licence was finally surrendered. 
Po nasvetu angleških organov je plovilo ponovno prejelo dovoljenje za 9 dni, preden je bilo dovoljenje dokončno umaknjeno.
Decommissioning aid of GBP 14 000 (16 588 euro) was paid, of which GBP 5 600 (6 635 euro) was funded by the EFF. (b) The English authorities accepted an application of January 2009 for the decommissioning of a fishing vessel which was not seaworthy since August 2008, as its engine needed replacement. 
Izplačana je bila pomoč za umik iz obratovanja v višini 14 000 GBP (16 588 EUR), od tega je 5 600 GBP (6 635 EUR) prispeval ESR. (b) Angleški organi so januarja 2009 sprejeli vlogo za umik ribiškega plovila iz obratovanja, vendar to plovilo že od avgusta 2008 ni bilo usposobljeno za plovbo, saj je bilo treba zamenjati motor.
Decommissioning aid of GBP 171 865 (203 623 euro) was paid, of which GBP 68 746 (81 452 euro) was funded by the EFF. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Izplačana je bila pomoč za umik iz obratovanja v višini 171 865 GBP (203 623 EUR), od tega je 68 746 GBP (81 452 EUR) prispeval ESR. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
Most Member States set public aid rates by reference only to the vessel’s fishing capacity in terms of GT, with public aid based on a fixed element and a variable element linked to the vessel’s GT. 
Večina držav članic določi stopnje javne pomoči samo ob upoštevanju ribolovne zmogljivosti plovila v BT, pri čemer javna pomoč temelji na fiksnem delu in na spremenljivem delu, povezanem z BT plovila.
Exceptions were the fishing vessel decommissioning scheme for England, where public aid rates were based on a tendering procedure; and Portugal, where sales, quota uptake and the state of targeted fish resources were considered. 
Izjemi sta bili shema za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja v Angliji, kjer so stopnje javne pomoči temeljile na razpisnem postopku, in Portugalska, kjer so bili upoštevani prodaja, izkoriščenost kvote in stanje ciljnih ribolovnih virov.
While for most Member States, the practice of only referring to vessel fishing capacity in terms of GT had the advantage of being transparent and simple to administer, it did not sufficiently take into account specific characteristics of applicants’ fishing vessels and in particular their impact on the fish resources targeted by the fishing vessel decommissioning scheme. 
Čeprav je imelo v večini držav članic sklicevanje izključno na ribolovno zmogljivost plovil v BT to prednost, da je bilo pregledno in preprosto za upravljanje, pa pri tem niso bile dovolj upoštevane specifične značilnosti ribiških plovil vlagateljev in zlasti njihov učinek na ribolovne vire, na katere je bila usmerjena shema za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja.
Furthermore the public aid rates did not specifically take into account the possibility that exists in some Member States for applicants for fishing vessel decommissioning schemes to sell their fishing rights (see paragraph 29). 33 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Poleg tega pri stopnjah javne pomoči ni bila posebej upoštevana možnost prodaje ribolovnih pravic, ki jo imajo prosilci za pomoč iz shem za umik plovil iz obratovanja v nekaterih državah članicah (glej odstavek 29). 33 Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
Similar public aid rates were paid by the Member States audited. 
Revidirane države članice so izplačevale podobne stopnje javne pomoči.
Box 9 gives the amounts of public aid payable for sample fishing vessel sizes. 
V okviru 9 so navedeni zneski javne pomoči, ki se lahko izplačajo za vzorčne velikosti ribiških plovil.
34 BOX 9 PUBLIC AID RATES FOR FISHING VESSEL DECOMMISSIONING IN SELECTED MEMBER STATES37 Member States Public aid (000 euro) for sample fishing vessel sizes 10 GT 100 GT 500 GT Denmark 123 553 1 631 Spain 118 527 1 556 France 112 457 1 397 Italy — vessels fishing for red tuna 168 753 2 223 Italy — other vessels 112 502 1 482 Poland 117 529 1 542 Portugal 101 452 1 334 United Kingdom (England) 131 N/A N/A 37 Source: Member States’ operational programmes and decommissioning schemes. 
34 OKVIR 9 Države članice Javna pomoč (v 1 000 EUR) za vzorčne velikosti ribiških plovil 10 BT 100 BT 500 BT Danska 123 553 1 631 Španija 118 527 1 556 Francija 112 457 1 397 Italija – plovila za ribolov modroplavutega tuna 168 753 2 223 Italija – druga plovila 112 502 1 482 Poljska 117 529 1 542 Portugalska 101 452 1 334 Združeno kraljestvo (Anglija) 131 NR NR STOPNJE JAVNE POMOČI ZA UMIK RIBIŠKIH PLOVIL IZ OBRATOVANJA V IZBRANIH DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH37 37 Vir: Operativni programi držav članic in njihove sheme za umik iz obratovanja.
The amount for England is an average, as aid rates were based on applicants’ tenders. 
Znesek za Anglijo je povprečje, saj so stopnje pomoči temeljile na ponudbah vlagateljev.
Only a rate for ‘10 GT’ is provided as the largest vessel scrapped with aid in England was 15 GT (no vessels had been scrapped with public aid from the EFF in Scotland by the time of the audit). 
Navedena je samo stopnja za„10 BT“, saj je imelo največje plovilo, ki je bilo v Angliji dano v razrez z javno pomočjo, 15 BT (v času revizije ni bilo na Škotskem dano v razrez nobeno plovilo z javno pomočjo iz ESR).
Exchange rates for Denmark, Poland and the United Kingdom as at 31 December 2010. 
Menjalni tečaji za Dansko, Poljsko in Združeno kraljestvo na dan 31. 12. 2010.
Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? LIMITED EFFECT OF THE ‘FUEL CRISIS REGULATION’ 63. 
12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim? 35 OMEJEN UČINEK „UREDBE O KRIZI ZARADI GORIVA“ 63.
Council Regulation (EC) No 744/2008 ‘the fuel crisis regulation’ introduced temporary rules and higher funding for fishing vessel decommissioning and investments on board to respond to significant increases in fuel prices, for fleet segments where the energy costs represented on average at least 30 % of the production costs. ‘Fleet segments’ were not defined by the regulation, so that Member States could implement fleet adaptation scheme (FAS) with flexibility to reflect their different fleet structures. 
744/2008, imenovano „uredba o krizi zaradi goriva“, so bila uvedena začasna pravila in višje financiranje za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja in naložbe v ribiška plovila kot odziv na precejšnje zvišanje cen goriva, in sicer za tiste segmente flot, kjer so energetski stroški povprečno predstavljali vsaj 30 % proizvodnih stroškov. „Segmenti flote“ v uredbi niso bili opredeljeni, tako da so lahko države članice prožno izvajale načrt za prilagoditev flote v skladu z različno sestavo svojih flot.
In order to benefit from the temporary rules, Member States had to create one or more FASs. 
Države članice so morale pripraviti enega ali več načrtov za prilagoditev flote, da so lahko izkoristile začasna pravila.
The fleet segments could be as small as one vessel. 
Segmenti flote so bili lahko zelo majhni in zajemali celo samo eno plovilo.
Of 40 original fishing vessels in the Danish FAS, 34 were decommissioned with aid and six were modernised between 2009 and 2010. 
Med letoma 2009 in 2010 je bilo 34 od prvotnih 40 ribiških plovil v danskem načrtu za prilagoditev flote umaknjenih iz obratovanja z javno pomočjo, šest pa jih je bilo posodobljenih.
Beneficiaries were required to invest at least the amount of any public aid received for fishing vessel decommissioning in modernisation or the construction/import of new fishing vessels. 
Upravičenci so morali v posodobitev ali izgradnjo/uvoz novih ribiških plovil vložiti vsaj toliko sredstev, kot je znašala javna pomoč, ki so jo prejeli za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja.
The construction of six new fishing vessels and four imported fishing vessels was partially financed in this way. 
Tako sta bila delno financirana gradnja šestih novih ribiških plovil in uvoz štirih ribiških plovil.
Although direct funding for the construction of fishing vessels is not permitted by the EFF, the effect of these transactions, taken as a whole, was that EFF funding indirectly contributed to the construction of new vessels. 
Čeprav ESR ne dovoljuje neposrednega financiranja gradnje novih ribiških plovil, je bil učinek teh transakcij kot celote v tem, da je financiranje iz ESR neposredno prispevalo h gradnji novih plovil.
This was against the objectives of the EFF regulation. 
To je bilo v nasprotju s cilji uredbe o ESR.
The Danish authorities considered that their FAS achieved a capacity reduction of 43 % in terms of GT, from 11 555 GT to 6 639 GT. 
Danski organi so menili, da je njihov načrt za prilagoditev flote dosegel 43-odstotno zmanjšanje zmogljivosti v BT, in sicer z 11 555 BT na 6 639 BT.
The claimed initial capacity of 11 555 GT however consisted of ships with a capacity of 5 742 GT together with 5 813 GT ‘capacity rights’ (rights that could be used to buy or import vessels). 
Vendar je prvotna zmogljivost 11 555 BT, za katero so bile vložene vloge za javno pomoč, zajemala ladje z zmogljivostjo 5 742 BT skupaj s 5 813 BT „pravic do zmogljivosti“ (pravice, ki se lahko uporabijo za nakup ali uvoz plovil).
The calculation of 43 % was based on the assumption that, as the fishing capacity rights were used by the beneficiaries to buy or import fishing vessels with the same capacity, the acquired fishing vessels did not actually increase fishing capacity. 
Izračun 43 % je temeljil na domnevi, da so upravičenci pravice do ribolovne zmogljivosti uporabili za nakup ali uvoz ribiških plovil enake zmogljivosti, zato nabavljena ribiška plovila dejansko niso povečala ribolovne zmogljivosti.
However as a result of the FAS, the tonnage of the actual vessels increased from 5 742 GT to 6 639 GT. 35 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Vendar se je zaradi načrta za prilagoditev ribolovne flote tonaža dejanskih plovil povečala s 5 742 BT na 6 639 BT. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
Of 36 original fishing vessels with a capacity of 4 407 GT, 18 were decommissioned and 18 were modernised. 
18 od prvotnih 36 ribiških plovil z zmogljivostjo 4 407 BT je bilo umaknjenih iz obratovanja, 18 pa posodobljenih.
The French authorities considered that these FAS schemes achieved a capacity reduction of 33 %, or 1 480 GT. 
Francoski organi so menili, da sta shemi v okviru načrtov za prilagoditev flote dosegli zmanjšanje zmogljivosti v višini 33 % oziroma 1 480 BT.
However, 10 of the 18 vessels decommissioned, with a capacity of 1 213 GT, had already been accepted under previous EFF-funded fishing vessel decommissioning schemes. 
Vendar je bilo 10 od 18 plovil, umaknjenih iz obratovanja, z zmogljivostjo 1 213 BT, že sprejetih v okviru prejšnjih shem za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja, ki jih je financiral ESR.
The Court considers that the real effect of the FAS in terms of actual vessel fishing capacity was a reduction of 267 GT (1 480 GT – 1 213 GT), which represents a reduction of only 6 % of the total fishing capacity. 
Sodišče meni, da je dejanski učinek načrtov za prilagoditev ribolovne flote na dejansko zmogljivost ribiških plovil zmanjšanje za 267 BT (1 480 BT – 1 213 BT), kar predstavlja le 6-odstotno zmanjšanje skupne ribolovne zmogljivosti.
In the United Kingdom (England), engine improvements were considered eligible when only improving fuel efficiency by 5 %. 
V Združenem kraljestvu (Anglija) so se izboljšave motorja štele za upravičene že, če so za samo 5 % izboljšale učinkovitost porabe goriva.
The CFP regulation38 provides that, each year, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and Council a summary of the results of Member States’ efforts to achieve a sustainable balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities, accompanied by opinions of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) and the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA). 
Uredba o SRP38 določa, da Komisija vsako leto pošlje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu povzetek rezultatov prizadevanj držav članic za doseganje trajnostnega ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi, ki mu priloži mnenji Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvo (STECF) in Svetovalnega odbora za ribištvo in ribogojstvo (ACFA).
The Commission’s summary is based on a yearly report from each Member State. 
Povzetek Komisije temelji na letnih poročilih držav članic.
The Commission’s implementing39 regulation specifies the minimum information to be included in Member States’ annual reports. 
V izvedbeni uredbi Komisije39 so določene minimalne informacije, ki jih morajo države članice navesti v svojih letnih poročilih.
In March 2008 the Commission services issued guidelines containing technical, biological and economic indicators to be used by Member States in these reports. 
Službe Komisije so marca 2008 izdale smernice, v katerih so navedeni tehnični, biološki in ekonomski kazalniki, ki jih morajo države članice uporabljati v teh poročilih.
The annual summary reports prepared by the Commission and opinions of STECF and ACFA, conclude each year that while Member State fleet reports are improving, they remain insufficient. 
V letnih zbirnih poročilih, ki jih pripravi Komisija, in mnenjih STECF in ACFA je vsako leto zaključek, da se poročila držav članic o flotah sicer izboljšujejo, vendar ostajajo nezadostna.
The reports were often not provided within the prescribed deadlines and most of them were not drawn up in accordance with the Commission’s guidelines of March 2008. 
Poročila pogosto niso bila zagotovljena v predpisanih rokih in večina jih ni bila pripravljenih v skladu s smernicami Komisije iz marca 2008.
The most recent available summary report40 of the Commission for 2008 concluded that the majority of the reports do not give enough information to enable the Commission to analyse the efforts made to achieve a balance between the fishing capacity of the fishing fleet and available fishing opportunities. 
V najnovejšem razpoložljivem zbirnem poročilu40, ki ga je pripravila Komisija za leto 2008, je naveden zaključek, da večina poročil ne vsebuje dovolj informacij, da bi Komisija lahko analizirala prizadevanja za doseganje ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo ribolovne flote in razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi možnostmi.
38 Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002. 
38 Člen 14.1 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002.
39 Article 13 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2003 of 12 August 2003 laying down implementing rules on the Community fleet policy defined in Chapter III of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 (OJ L 204, 13.8.2003, p. 
39 Člen 13 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1438/2003 z dne 12. avgusta 2003 o pravilih za izvajanje politike flote Skupnosti, kakor je opredeljena v poglavju III Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
40 Annualreportfromthe Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Member States’ efforts during 2008 to achieve a sustainable balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities (COM(2010) 60 final of 25 February 2010). 36 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
40 Letno poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o prizadevanjih držav članic v letu 2008, da bi dosegle trajnostno ravnovesje med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi, COM(2010) 60 konč. z dne 25.2.2010. 36 Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?