natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The effect on retail prices is amplified by the excise duty policy adopted by most tobacco producing Member States, who apply a lower rate of duty to their own tobacco. 
Ta učinek na maloprodajne cene še povečuje politika trošarine, ki jo je sprejela večina držav članic, ki imajo za svoj lastni tobak nižje dajatve.
For example, France applied the minimum rate of excise duty to dark-tobacco cigarettes manufactured locally. 
Francija, na primer, je za lokalno izdelane cigarete iz temnega tobaka uvedla najnižjo stopnjo tro-šarine.
This is 20 % lower than the rate applied to imported light-tobacco cigarettes. 
Ta je 20 % nižja od stopnje, ki velja za uvožene cigarete iz svetlega tobaka.
In this way, Member States favour their national cigarette brands, containing a large proportion of subsidised tobacco (13). 
Na ta način države članice favorizirajo svoje nacionalne znamke cigaret, ki vsebujejo velik delež subvencioniranega tobaka (13).
In consequence, retail prices were lowered. 
Posledica tega je bila, da so se maloprodajne cene znižale.
Authori-tative sources, such as the World Health Organisation and the World Bank (14), consider that lower prices increase consumption levels and by association, the level of tobacco-related disease. 
Zanesljivi viri, denimo Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija in Svetovna banka (14), menijo, da nižje cene povečujejo porabo in posledično tudi pogostost s tobakom povezanih bolezni.
THE CMO HAS NOT ACHIEVED THE DESIRED IMPACT The various measures have not achieved their objectives 38. 
SKUPNA UREDITEV TRGA NI PRINESLA ŽELENEGA UČINKA Številni ukrepi niso izpolnili ciljev 38.
The Court examined whether, overall, the measures introduced since the 1998 reform had achieved the objectives set and found that they had either not been as successful as intended in many respects or impact could not be measured to determine whether they had been successful or not. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali so ukrepi, sprejeti po reformi leta 1998, celostno gledano izpolnili zastavljene cilje, in ugotovilo, da v veliko ozirih bodisi niso bili tako uspešni, kakor bi naj bili, bodisi njihovega učinka ni mogoče izmeriti, da bi ugotovili, ali so bili uspešni ali ne.
The impact of aid on growersŐ income cannot be assessed 39. 
Vpliva pomoči na dohodke pridelovalcev ni mogoče oceniti 39.
By compensating for the greater costs involved, the premium system was intended to help make EU tobacco more marketable and thus achieve a fair income. 
Namen sistema premij, ki zagotavlja kompenzacijo večjih stroškov, je bil olajšati prodajo v EU proizvedenega tobaka EU ter tako pridelovalcem omogočiti doseganje primernega dohodka.
The Commission did not define what constitutes a Ôfair incomeŐ from growing tobacco, set quantifiable targets for improvement or ensure that appropriate information on production costs, prices and income from reliable sources was received in order to measure impact. 
Komisija ni opredelila „primernega dohodka“ za pridelavo tobaka, ni določila merljivih ciljev za izboljšanje ter ni zagotovila ustreznih informacij o stroških proizvodnje, cenah in dohodkih, pridobljenih iz zanesljivih virov, da bi tako lahko izmerili vpliv.
It was therefore unable to evaluate the impact of premium on growersŐ income overall and their standard of living (15). 
Iz tega razloga ni mogla oceniti vpliva premij na celotni dohodek pridelovalcev in na njihovo življenjsko raven (15).
(13) This situation is confirmed by the Court of JusticeŐs ruling of 27 February 2002, Case C-302/00 Commission v French Republic, concerning differential taxation of dark and Virginia type tobacco. 
(13) To potrjuje razsodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 27. februarja 2002, Zadeva C-302/00 Komisija proti Republiki Franciji, ki zadeva različno obdavčenje temnega tobaka in tobaka viržinskega tipa.
(14) The WHO Framework Convention on tobacco control, World Bank economics of tobacco toolkit: ÔEconomic analysis of tobacco demandŐ. 
(14) Okvirna konvencija Svetovne zdravstvene ureditve za nadzor tobaka, brošura Svetovne banke o ekonomiji tobaka: „Ekonomska analiza povpraševanja po tobaku“ (Economic Analysis of Tobacco Demand).
(15) The evaluation report referred to by the Commission does not take into account income from secondary activities which is necessary to evaluate growers income overall and their standard of living. 
(15) Ocenjevalno poročilo, na katerega se sklicuje Komisija, ne upošteva dohodkov iz sekundarnih dejavnosti, kar je nujno za oceno celotnega dohodka pridelovalcev in njihove življenjske ravni.
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/9 The producersŐ dependence on aid has not changed 40. 
17.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 41/9 Odvisnost proizvajalcev od pomoči se ni spremenila 40.
The premium represents around 75 % of producersŐ income from tobacco production but has reached nearly 95 % for production of one variety in Italy. 
Premija predstavlja približno 75 % dohodka proizvajalcev iz proizvodnje tobaka, v Italiji pa je pri proizvodnji ene od sort dosegla skoraj 95 %.
The variable element of premium was intended to provide an incentive to producers to improve quality in order to increase the value of their product thus reducing their dependence on aid. 
Spremenljivi element premije naj bi spodbujal proizvajalce k izboljševanju kakovosti, da bi tako povečali vrednost svojih proizvodov in zmanjšali svojo odvisnost od pomoči.
The Commission assumed that the costs to the producer of improving quality would be covered by the variable premium and higher sales prices and thus reduce dependence on subsidies. 
Komisija je predpostavila, da bodo stroške, ki jih bo imel proizvajalec z izboljševanjem kakovosti, pokrile spremenljiva premija in višje prodajne cene, s čimer bi se zmanjšala odvisnost od subvencij.
The evidence available to the Commission however showed the contrary. 
Toda dokazi, ki jih je imela Komisija na voljo, so iz-kazovali nasprotno.
The information available at the Commission in 1998 indicated that, even for the better quality tobacco, the sales prices communicated by Member States, along with the EU premium did not cover the costs of production (see also paragraph 48). 
Informacije, ki jih je imela Komisija na voljo leta 1998, so kazale, da prodajne cene, ki so jih sporočile države članice, celo za tobak boljše kakovosti skupaj s premijo EU ne pokrivajo proizvodnih stroškov (glej tudi odstavek 48).
Furthermore, there is no information available showing to what extent the different measures of the CMO would have reduced the dependence on subsidies. 
Poleg tega ni na voljo nobenih informacij, ki bi kazale, v kakšni meri naj bi različni ukrepi skupne ureditve trga zmanjšali odvisnost od subvencij.
The most recent market information shows that EU average sales prices in 2003 were lower than in 2002 making producers more dependent on subsidies in 2003 than in 2002. 
Najnovejše tržne informacije kažejo, da so bile povprečne prodajne cene v EU leta 2003 nižje kakor leta 2002, zaradi česar so bili proizvajalci leta 2003 bolj odvisni od subvencij kakor leta 2002.
The impact of aid on the improvement of tobacco quality 42. 
Vpliv pomoči na izboljšanje kakovosti tobaka 42.
The Directorate-General for Agriculture considered that improvements in quality within each variety group could be measured by increases in the quantity of tobacco produced of the higher grades. 
Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo je bil mnenja, da bo mogoče izboljšanje kakovosti znotraj sleherne skupine sort izmeriti preko povečanja količine proizvedenega tobaka višjega kakovostnega razreda.
This however, required a clear definition of quality standards and performance to be measurable on a constant basis. 
Za to pa bi bila potrebna jasna opredelitev standardov kakovosti in ravno tako bi moralo biti mogoče na stalni osnovi meriti uspešnost.
Several factors militated against this. 
Temu je nasprotovalo več dejavnikov.
Firstly, there is no standard grading system and there are variations between Member States in the way in which grades are established for the same varieties of tobacco. 
Prvič, ni standardnega sistema razvrščanja in v različnih državah članicah različno razvrščajo iste sorte tobaka.
Secondly, in order to measure quality improvements over time, it is necessary to take into account the composition of producer groups and the characteristics of their production. 
Drugič, da bi izmerili izboljšanje kakovosti v času, moramo upoštevati sestavo skupin proizvajalcev in značilnosti njihove proizvodnje.
The effect of a low-quality producer leaving a group, would be to increase the quality of the group concerned even though there would be no improvements of production by producers as a whole. 
Če bi skupino zapustil proizvajalec slabe kakovosti, bi to učinkovalo tako, da bi se povečala kakovost te skupine, pa čeprav proizvajalci kot celota ne bi prav nič izboljšali proizvodnje.
It was not possible to measure the quality improvements because of the changes which occurred in producer groups. 
Izboljšav kakovosti ni bilo mogoče izmeriti zaradi sprememb, do katerih je prihajalo v skupinah proizvajalcev.
For example, the 1998 reform introduced minimum size requirements for producer groups which resulted in significant reorganisation. 
Reforma iz leta 1998 je, denimo, uvedla zahtevo po minimalni velikosti za skupino proizvajalcev, posledica tega pa je bila precejšnja reorganizacija.
Also, membership of most producer groups changes from year to year. 
Članstvo večine skupin proizvajalcev se poleg tega tudi vsako leto spreminja.
The way in which producer groups are organised can work against modulation of the variable premium. 
Način, kako so organizirane skupine proizvajalcev, lahko nasprotuje prilagajanju spremenljive premije.
Whereas the objective of the variable premium is to provide an incentive to grow better quality tobacco, reality can be different: if all the producers in a group are producing the same quality (grade) of a particular variety the total variable premium available to the group for that variety will be apportioned equally between them (see also paragraph 9). 
Medtem ko je bil cilj spremenljive premije spodbujati h gojenju tobaka boljše kakovosti, je rezultat v praksi lahko drugačen: če vsi proizvajalci v skupini proizvajajo enako kakovosten (enako uvrščen) tobak določene sorte, bo celotna spremenljiva premija, ki je na voljo skupini za to sorto, enakomerno porazdeljena mednje (glej tudi odstavek 9).
The same applies if producers of a poorer grade of the same variety group together. 
Isto velja, če se združijo proizvajalci slabšega kakovostnega razreda iste skupine sort tobaka.
The members of both groups will get the same amount of variable premium even though the quality they are producing is different. 
Člani obeh skupin bodo dobili enak znesek spremenljive premije, čeprav pridelujejo tobak različne kakovosti.
These observations show that, contrary to its objective, the premium system is not necessarily an incentive to improve quality: it allows producers to maximise aid without improvement in quality and as shown in certain cases, identified by the Court and the Commission services, there is no difference in premium payments between good and bad producers. 
Ta opažanja kažejo, da sistem premij v nasprotju s svojim ciljem ne spodbuja nujno k izboljševanju kakovosti: proizvajalcem namreč omogoča, da dobijo najvišjo pomoč, ne da bi izboljšali kakovost, in kakor kažejo nekateri primeri, ki so jih odkrile službe Sodišča in Komisije, med izplačili premij dobrim in slabim proizvajalcem ni nikakršnih razlik.
The rates of premium are inconsistent with the quality of tobacco 45. 
Višine premij se ne ujemajo s kakovostjo tobaka 45.
Differentiation of premium between variety groups was intended to encourage the cultivation of the higher quality varieties: higher premiums would be paid for higher quality as it involved higher production costs. 
Namen diferenciacije premij med sortami tobaka je bil spodbuditi gojenje sort višje kakovosti: višje premije naj bi plačevali za višjo kakovost, saj povzroča večje proizvodne stroške.
This would have required annual modifications of premium levels when justified by changes in costs and income. 
Za to bi bile potrebne letne spremembe višin premij, kadar bi jih upravičevale spremembe stroškov in dohodkov.
Since 1993 however, premium levels set by the Council have remained largely unchanged. 
Vendar so višine premij, ki jih je določil Svet, od leta 1993 večinoma ostale nespremenjene.
In the absence of sufficiently detailed costs and income information from the Commission, the Court made its own analysis to verify the correlation between the level of premium paid, the quality of tobacco production and production costs. 
Ker Komisija ni podala dovolj podrobnih informacij o stroških in dohodkih, je Sodišče opravilo lastno analizo, da bi preverilo povezavo med višino plačane premije, kakovostjo proizvedenega tobaka in proizvodnimi stroški.
For the year 1998, it used data obtained specifically from Greece in relation to production costs and such data as was available from the Commission on sales prices. 
Za leto 1998 je uporabilo podatke o proizvodnih stroških, dobljene od Grčije, za prodajne cene pa podatke, razpoložljive pri Komisiji.
This analysis was based uniquely on Greece as it provided the most complete data set for EU tobacco varieties. 
Ta analiza je temeljila izključno na Grčiji, saj je ta zagotovila najpopolnejši nabor podatkov za sorte tobaka v EU.
In view of the intention to reward quality and the higher costs involved in achieving it via the premium system, the Court sought to compare the quality of tobacco (which the Commission considered to be reflected in sales prices) with production costs and the level of premium paid. 
Glede na namen nagrajevati kakovost in višje stroške, ki so potrebni za doseganje kakovosti, s pomočjo sistema premij, je Sodišče poskušalo primerjati kakovost tobaka (za katero je Komisija menila, da jo odsevajo prodajne cene) s proizvodnimi stroški in višino plačanih premij.
The comparison in Annex 2shows that the premium applied to a high quality tobacco such as Basmas represented 47 % of production costs whereas that applied to a lower quality such as Katerini was 87 %. 
Primerjava v Prilogi 2 kaže, da je premija za visoko kakovosten tobak, kakršen je basmas, predstavljala 47 % proizvodnih stroškov, premija za tobak nižje kakovosti, kakršen je katerini, pa 87 %.
This was contrary to the objective of seeking to reimburse a higher proportion of the greater costs associated with the production of the higher quality varieties and provide a margin which producers would find an incentive. 
To je bilo v nasprotju s ciljem povračila večjega deleža višjih stroškov, povezanih s proizvodnjo sorte višje kakovosti, ter zagotoviti maržo, ki bi bila za proizvajalce spodbudna.
The reimbursement of a higher proportion of production costs was intended to have a positive effect on income. 
Povračilo večjega deleža proizvodnih stroškov bi naj imelo pozitiven učinek na dohodek.
The results show that, for most varieties in Greece, income was negative. 
Rezultati kažejo, da je bil dohodek pri večini sort v Grčiji negativen.
The Court also looked at the reliability of the sale prices communicated to the Commission by the Member States. 
Sodišče si je ogledalo tudi zanesljivost prodajnih cen, ki so jih Komisiji posredovale države članice.
As a result of its audit in several Member States, including Greece, the Court found that the average sales prices communicated to the Commission, indeed did not always include the additional amounts paid by first processors to producers or the services in kind provided to them (see also paragraph 28). 
Po reviziji v več državah članicah, tudi v Grčiji, je Sodišče ugotovilo, da povprečne prodajne cene, posredovane Komisiji, v resnici niso vselej vključevale dodatkov, ki so jih prvi predelovalci plačali proizvajalcem ali dali v naravi (glej tudi odstavek 28).
These can represent a substantial source of additional ÔincomeŐ for producers and in one Member State 
Ta plačila lahko pomenijo precejšen vir dodatnega „dohodka“ za proizvajalce, v eni izmed držav članic pa so ta plačila predstavljala kar 28%.
C 41/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2005 such additional payments were as much as 28 %. Thissuggested that the sales prices supplied to the Commission by Member States might not provide complete information about returns to growers. 
C 41/10 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 17.2.2005 možnost, da prodajne cene, ki so jih Komisiji posredovale države članice, morda ne vsebujejo vseh informacij o plačilih pridelov-alcem.
The Commission was thus unable to obtain satisfactory information on which to base its management of the tobacco regime. 
Komisija tako ni mogla dobiti zadovoljivih informacij, na katerih bi lahko temeljilo njeno upravljanje tobačnega režima.
The Court again analysed the correlation between the level of premium and the quality of tobacco for the year 2000. 
Sodišče je ponovno analiziralo povezavo med višino premije in kakovostjo tobaka za leto 2000.
Since similar data to those for 1998 were not available, the Court compared the average premium per hectare, per variety and Member State, with the CommissionŐs ranking of varieties by quality. 
Ker podatkov, podobnih podatkom za leto 1998, ni bilo na voljo, je Sodišče primerjalo povprečno premijo na hektar, na sorto in na državo članico z razvrstitvijo sort tobaka glede na kakovost, kakršno je pripravila Komisija.
This showed that in four out of five Member States, premium did not correspond to the quality ranking and that the highest premium was paid to lower quality varieties. 
Tako se je izkazalo, da v štirih od petih držav članic premija ne ustreza razvrstitvi glede na kakovost in da je bila najvišja premija plačana za sorte nižje kakovosti.
The results are set out in more detail in Annex 3. 
Rezultati so podrobneje prikazani v Prilogi 3.
Efforts to align production and demand have not been successful 50. 
Prizadevanja za uskladitev proizvodnje in povpraševanja niso bila uspešna 50.
In order to stabilise markets and ensure supplies the CMO is, inter alia, intended to align production to the EU marketŐs requirements. 
Skupna ureditev trga naj bi, z namenom stabilizacije trga in zagotavljanja oskrbe, med drugim uskladila proizvodnjo z zahtevami trga EU.
Analysis of the EU supply balance table shows that overall domestic consumption of EU production did not change significantly between 1996 and 2000 at which time it was 40 %. 
Analiza bilance oskrbe EU v tabeli kaže, da se celotna domača poraba proizvedenega v EU med letoma 1996 in 2000, ko je znašala 40 %, ni bistveno spremenila.
Detailed data by variety group is not available. 
Podrobnih podatkov za posamezne skupine sort ni na voljo.
Imports have remained stable throughout the same period at 65 %. 
Uvoz se je v istem času ohranjal pri stalni vrednosti 65 %.
There is no evidence that the CMO has influenced EU production so as to reduce the mismatch of supply and demand. 
Ne kaže, da je skupna ureditev trga vplivala na proizvodnjo EU v smeri zmanjševanja neskladja med ponudbo in povpraševanjem.
While certain types of tobacco have to be imported, a successful policy would have led to some substitution of domestic products for imports. 
Nekatere tipe tobaka je sicer treba uvažati, vendar bi uspešna politika privedla do tega, da bi nekatere uvozne postavke nadomestili z domačimi proizvodi.
But this did not happen. 
Vendar pa se to ni zgodilo.
The Court notes that the Commission considers that the CMO policy was successful even though it recognises that sufficient data was not available and that the scheme before the 1998 reform was not adapted to solve the most evident problems of the sector, i.e. growing the tobacco in demand (see paragraph 96 of its replies). 
Sodišče opaža, da Komisija meni, da je bila politika skupne ureditve trga uspešna, čeprav priznava, da ni bilo na voljo zadostnih podatkov in da shema pred reformo iz leta 1998 ni bila ustrezna za reševanje najvidnejših problemov tega sektorja – se pravi pridelave tobaka, po katerem je povpraševanje (glej odstavek 96 njenih odgovorov).
Expenditure from the Tobacco Fund has been limited and there were weaknesses in project management 52. 
Izdatki iz Sklada za tobak so bili omejeni, vodenje projekta pa je bilo pomanjkljivo 52.
The Fund was established in 1993. 
Sklad je bil ustanovljen leta 1993.
It was initially funded by 0,5 % withheld from premium which was progressively increased to 3 % and was intended to finance programmes of research and information relating to the harmful effects of tobacco consumption and preventive and curative measures. 
Na začetku se je vanj stekalo 0,5 % izplačil premije, zadržanim v ta namen, postopoma pa se je ta delež povečal na 3 %. Z njim naj bi financirali raziskovalne in informativne programe v zvezi s škodljivimi učinki uporabe tobaka ter preventivnimi in kurativnimi ukrepi.
It was also intended to help orient production towards the least harmful varieties and qualities. 
Njegov namen je bil tudi pomagati pri usmerjanju k najmanj škodljivim sortam in kakovostim.
Depending on the type of activity funded, such projects fell to be managed by either the Directorate-General for Agriculture or the Directorate General for Health and Consumer Protection. 
V odvisnosti od financirane dejavnosti sta take projekte upravljala bodisi Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo bodisi Generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov.
As part of the 1998 reforms, the financing of the fund was doubled even though there had not been much activity. 
Z reformo iz leta 1998 je bilo financiranje sklada podvojeno, čeprav ni bil pretirano dejaven.
The Court analysed the utilisation of the Fund. 
Sodišče je analiziralo uporabo Sklada.
Annex 4 shows that payments during the first five years (1996 to 2000) amounted, on average, to 18 % of the available funding and the rate of utilisation has continuously increased over the last three years to reach 65 % in 2003. 
Priloga 4 kaže, da so izplačila v prvih petih letih (1996–2000) v povprečju znašala 18% razpoložljivih sredstev ter da se je stopnja uporabe v zadnjih treh letih stalno povečevala, tako da je leta 2003 dosegla 65%.
The unused balance of the Fund stood at some 68 million euro. 
Neuporabljena bilanca Sklada je bila kakih 68 milijonov EUR.
Although modest in extent, the Court identified weaknesses in project management such as ineligible expenditure, expenditure before the date of the contract or in periods other than those stipulated in the contracts, advances paid not covered by guarantees, the existence of a posteriori allocation of appropriations, and contracts not signed by either of the two parties. 
Sodišče je opazilo manjše pomanjkljivosti pri vodenju projekta, denimo neupravičena izplačila, izplačila pred datumom na pogodbi ali izvršena izven pogodbeno določenega časa, avanse, izplačane brez garancij, naknadne dodelitve subvencije ter pogodbe, ki jih ena izmed strani ni podpisala.
The Court noted that, in his Annual Activity Report for 2002, the Director-General, Agriculture made a reservation to his declaration to the effect, that he did not have sufficient assurance that the resources transferred to the Fund since 1993 had been used in accordance with the principles of regularity and sound financial management. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je generalni direktor za kmetijstvo v svojem letnem poročilu o delu za leto 2002 v svoji izjavi izrazil zadržek, da nima zadostnih zagotovil, da so bila sredstva, nakazana v Sklad od leta 1993 naprej, uporabljena v skladu z načeli zakonitosti in dobrega finančnega poslovodenja.
In contrast, the Director-General of the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection concluded in his 2001 Activity Report that, having assessed the weaknesses concerning the administration of projects under his control, the problems were not sufficiently material to merit formal reservation. 
Nasprotno pa je generalni direktor Generalnega direktorata za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov v svojem poročilu o delu za leto 2001, po oceni pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z upravljanjem projektov pod njegovim nadzorom, sklenil, da problemi niso tako bistveni, da bi zaslužili formalne zadržke.