natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
SPS has been growing in importance and in 2009 represented 28 806 million euro of expenditure. — The direct aid scheme ‘Single Area Payment Scheme’ (SAPS) which provides for the payment of uniform amounts per eligible hectare of agricultural land. 
SEP postaja vse pomemb­ nejša in je leta 2009 pomenila odhodke v višini 28 806 milijonov EUR. — Pri shemi neposredne pomoči, ki se imenuje „shema enot­ nega plačila na površino“ (SEPP), je predvideno plačilo enotnih zneskov na hektar upravičenih kmetijskih zemljišč.
SAPS is currently applied in ten of the new Member States (6) and in 2009 accounted for 3 723 million euro of expenditure. — Other direct aid schemes (coupled payments) designed to maintain production in areas which would otherwise be at risk of abandonment of production. 
SEPP se trenutno uporablja v desetih novih državah članicah (6) in je v letu 2009 pomenila odhodke v višini 3 723 milijonov EUR. — Druge sheme neposrednih pomoči (vezana plačila) so zasnovane za ohranjanje proizvodnje na površini, za katero bi sicer obstajalo tveganje opustitve proizvodnje.
The amounts involved, which in general are declining due to further decoupling and integration of other support schemes in the SPS, accounted for 6 585 million euro of expenditure. — Interventions in agricultural markets: the principal measures are intervention, storage and export refunds and other measures such as specific support for the wine, fruit and vegetable and food programmes (in total amounting to 3 988 million euro) and Sugar Restructuring Fund (3 018 million euro). _____________ (4) The number and value of each farmer's entitlement was calculated by the national authorities according to one of the models provided for under EU legislation. 
S tem povezani zneski se zaradi nadaljnjega ločevanja in vključe­ vanja drugih podpornih shem na splošno zmanjšujejo, in so predstavljali odhodke v višini 6 585 milijonov EUR. — Intervencije na kmetijskih trgih: glavni ukrepi so intervencije, skladiščenje, izvozna nadomestila in drugi ukrepi, kot so posebna podpora za programe za vino, sadje in zelenjavo ter pomoč v hrani (v skupnem znesku 3 988 milijonov EUR) in sklad za prestrukturiranje sladkorne industrije (3 018 milijonov EUR). _____________ (4) Število in vrednost pravic za vsakega kmeta so izračunali nacionalni organi v skladu z enim od modelov, ki jih določa zakonodaja EU.
Under the historical model each farmer is granted entitlements based on the average amount of aid received and area farmed during the reference period 2000 to 2002. 
V okviru zgodovinskega modela se vsakemu kmetu odobrijo pravice na osnovi povprečnega zneska prejete pomoči in območja, na katerem je kmetoval med letoma 2000 in 2002.
Under the regional model all entitlements of a region have the same flat-rate value and the farmer is allocated an entitlement for every eligible hectare declared in the first year of application. 
V okviru regionalnega modela pa imajo vse pravice v neki regiji enako pavšalno vrednost in posameznemu kmetu se dodeli pravica za vsak upravičen prija­ vljen hektar v prvem letu zahtevka.
The hybrid model combines the historical element with a flat rate amount and, if it is dynamic, the historical component decreases each year until it becomes a predominantly flat rate-system. 
Hibridni model združuje zgodo­ vinski element s pavšalnim zneskom in zgodovinska komponenta se, če je model dinamičen, vsako leto zmanjša, dokler ne preide v pretežno pavšalni sistem.
(5) Based on Article 137 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 
(5) Na podlagi člena 137 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 (UL L 30, 31.1.2009, str.
16), payment entitlements allocated to farmers before 1 January 2009 shall be deemed legal and regular as from 1 January 2010, except in cases of allocation on the basis of factually incorrect applications unless the farmer could not reasonably have detected the error. 
16), se pravice do plačila, dodeljene kmetom pred 1. januarjem 2009, štejejo za zakonite in redne od 1. januarja 2010, razen v primerih dodelitve na podlagi vsebinsko napačnih zahtevkov, razen če kmet ni mogel odkriti napake.
(6) Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. 
(6) V Bolgariji, na Češkem, v Estoniji, na Cipru, v Latviji, Litvi, na Madžarskem, Poljskem, v Romuniji in na Slovaškem.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.5. — Payments made from the Sugar Restructuring Fund were financed by contributions from producers holding quota which are revenue assigned to the EAGF. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.5. — Plačila iz Sklada za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja so bila financirana s prispevki proizvajalcev, ki imajo kvote, tj. prihodki, ki so namenjeni EKJS.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 59 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.6. TheEuropeanAgriculturalFundforRuralDevelopment (EAFRD) co-finances Rural Development expenditure which covers a large number of measures such as agri-environmental schemes, compensatory amounts for farming in less-favoured areas, investments in farms, and infrastructure in rural areas (8 992 million euro) (7). 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 59 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.6 Evropskikmetijskiskladzarazvojpodeželja(EKSRP) sofinancira odhodke za razvoj podeželja, ki zajemajo številne ukrepe, kot so kmetijsko-okoljski programi, kompenzacijski zneski za kmetovanje na območjih z omejenimi možnostmi, naložbe v kmetije in infrastruktura na podeželskih območjih (8 992 milijonov EUR) (7).
In 2009, in the framework of the so called CAP Health Check(8) and the European Economic Recovery Plan (9), additional funding has been channelled via Rural Development to finance priorities such as broadband internet infrastructure, climate change, renewable energies, water management, biodiversity and measures accompanying restructuring of the dairy sector. 
Leta 2009 so se v okviru tako imenovanega zdravstvenega pregleda SKP(8) in Evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva (9) z dodatnimi sredstvi prek programov razvoja podeželja financirale prednostne naloge, kot so širokopasovna internetna infrastruktura, klimatske spre­ membe, obnovljivi viri energije, gospodarjenje z vodnimi viri, biotska raznovrstnost in spremljevalni ukrepi za prestrukturi­ ranje sektorja mleka.
However, no expenditure has been incurred under the latter measures during 2009. 
Vendar v okviru omenjenih ukrepov leta 2009 ni bilo odhodkov.
UnderallEAGFdirectaidschemescoveredbyCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (10) and certain EAFRD aid schemes, beneficiaries of EU aid have to fulfil ‘cross compliance’ requirements. 
1782/2003 (10), in nekaterih shem pomoči EKSRP morajo upravičenci do pomoči EU izpol­ njevati zahteve v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo.
These requirements relate to the protection of the environment, the public, animal and plant health, animal welfare (Statutory Management Requirements) and to the maintenance of agricultural land in good agri­ cultural and environmental condition (GAEC) (11). 
Te zahteve se nanašajo na varovanje okolja, javno zdravje ter zdravje živali in rastlin, dobro počutje živali (predpisane zahteve ravnanja) ter na ohranjanje zemljišč v stanju, ki je v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji (11).
EU legis­ lation provides that when non-compliance with those requirements is noted, a reduction or exclusion (12) shall be applied on the overall amount of direct payments made in respect of the applications submitted in the course of the calendar year of the finding. 
Zakonodaja EU določa, da se ob ugotovitvi neskladnosti s temi zahtevami uporabi znižanje ali izključitev (12) celotnega zneska izvršenih nepo­ srednih plačil za zahtevke, ki so bili predloženi v koledarskem letu ugotovitve.
The Court’s testing of payments to farmers includes only a limited number of cross compliance requirements (see paragraph 3.17, third indent). 
Preizkušanje plačil kmetom, ki ga izvede Sodišče, zajema le omejeno število zahtev v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo (glej odstavek 3.17, tretja alinea).
When infringements are detected they are classified as non-quan­ tifiable errors and therefore not included in the error rate calculation. _____________ (7) This amount entails expenditure in respect of previous programming period as well as pre-accession instruments. 
Kadar so odkrite kršitve, so razvrščene med količinsko neopredeljive napake in zato niso zajete v izračun stopnje napak. _____________ (7) Ta znesek vključuje odhodke v zvezi s prejšnjim programskim obdobjem in predpristopnimi instrumenti.
(8) Council Regulation (EC) No 74/2009 (OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 
74/2009 (UL L 30, 31.1.2009, str.
(9) Council Regulation (EC) No 473/2009 (OJ L 144, 9.6.2009, p. 
473/2009 (UL L 144, 9.6.2009, str. 3).
(10) OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 
(10) UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str.
(11) Whilst GAEC standards, as referred to in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, apply in all Member States, Statutory Management Requirements (SMRs) as referred to in Annex III of that regulation are mandatory only in EU-15. 
(11) Standardi za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje, ki so navedeni v Prilogi IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003, se uporabljajo v vseh državah članicah, predpisane zahteve ravnanja, ki so navedene v Prilogi III k isti Uredbi, pa so zavezujoče le v EU-15.
For the EU-10, SMRs are being phased in between 2009 and 2013, and for EU-2 between 2012 and 2014. 
Za EU-10 se predpisane zahteve ravnanja postopoma uvajajo med letoma 2009 in 2013, za EU-2 pa bodo uvedene med letoma 2012 in 2014.
(12) According to Articles 66 and 67 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 (OJ L 141, 30.4.2004, p. 
(12) V skladu s členoma 66 in 67 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 796/2004 (UL L 141, 30.4.2004, str.
18), the level of the reduction per SMR or GAEC not complied with can vary between 1 % and 5 % in case of negligence and can lead to full rejection of the aid in case of intentional non-compliance. 
18) lahko raven znižanj pri nesklad­ nosti s posamezno predpisano zahtevo ravnanja in dobrimi kmetij­ skimi in okoljskimi pogoji znaša med 1 % in 5 % pri malomar­ nosti, pri namerni neskladnosti pa lahko pride do popolne izključitve iz plačil.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.6. Member States started implementing the new priorities identified in the Health Check and the European Economic Recovery Plan already in 2009, but only declared expenditure to the Commission as of the end of 2009 because the programme modifications had not been approved before. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.6 Države članice so začele izvajati nove prednostne naloge, opredeljene v sistematskem pregledu SKP in Evropskem načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva že v letu 2009, vendar so odhodke Komisiji prijavile šele konec leta 2009, saj spremembe programov prej še niso bile odobrene.
The figure (8 992 million) relates to payment appropriations for chapters 0504 and 0505, which includes: — operational technical assistance; — genetic resources measures; — recoveries from former EAGGF guarantee programmes (EU15); — pre-accession instruments (SAPARD), which are not part of EAFRD and in fact are under a separate budget heading as well as another heading within the Financial Perspectives. 
Znesek (8 992 milijonov EUR) se nanaša na odobritve plačil za poglavji 05 04 in 05 05, ki vključujejo: — operativno tehnično pomoč, — ukrepe za genske vire, — vračila iz prejšnjih jamstvenih programov EKUJS (EU15), — predpristopne instrumente (SAPARD), ki niso del EKSRP in so pravzaprav pod ločeno proračunsko postavko ter pod drugo postavko v okviru finančnih okvirov.
EN 60 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.8. 
SL 60 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.8 Do pomoči EU na površino so upravičeni samo kmetje.
OnlyfarmersareeligibleforEUareaaid.Afarmeris defined to be a person who carries out an agricultural activity. 
Kmet je opredeljen kot oseba, ki izvaja kmetijsko dejavnost.
An agricultural activity is defined as the production, rearing or growing of agricultural products including harvesting, milking, breeding animals and keeping animals for farming purposes, or maintaining the land in good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC) (13). 
Ta je opredeljena kot proizvodnja, vzreja ali pridelovanje kmetij­ skih proizvodov, kar zajema žetev, molžo, rejo živali in rejo živali za kmetijske namene ali ohranjanje zemljišč v stanju, ki je v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji (13).
According to the relevant EU rules, if no other agricultural activity is carried out by the applicant, the maintenance of land in GAEC constitutes the minimum agri­ cultural activity required of the applicant to be eligible for aid. 3.9. 
V skladu z veljavnimi pravili EU se ohranjanje zemljišča v dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih šteje kot minimalna kmetijska dejavnost, ki jo mora vlagatelj zahtevka izvajati, da je upra­ vičen do pomoči, če ne izvaja nobene druge kmetijske dejav­ nosti.
Expenditureunderbothfundsischannelledthrough some 80 national or regional paying agencies. 
3.9 Odhodkeobehskladovizvršujepribližno80nacio­ nalnih ali regionalnih plačilnih agencij.
Before these paying agencies can claim any expenditure from the EU-budget, they must be accredited on the basis of criteria laid down by the Commission. 
Preden te plačilne agencije lahko vložijo zahtevek za kakršen koli odhodek iz proračuna EU, morajo biti akreditirane na osnovi meril, ki jih določi Komisija.
These paying agencies make payments to the beneficiaries and prior to doing so, they must, either directly or through delegated bodies, satisfy them­ selves of the eligibility of the aid applications. 
Te plačilne agencije izvršujejo plačila upra­ vičencem, pred tem pa se morajo neposredno ali prek poobla­ ščenih organov prepričati o upravičenosti zahtevkov za pomoč.
The accounts and payments of the paying agencies are examined by inde­ pendent audit bodies (certification bodies) which report to the Commission in February of the following year. 
Računovodske izkaze in plačila plačilnih agencij pregledajo neodvisni revizijski organi (certifikacijski organi), ki o tem poročajo Komisiji februarja naslednjega leta.
Policy areas Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Health and Consumer Protection 3.10. The Union’s policy on the environment should contribute to protecting and improving the quality of the environment, human health, and rational utilisation of natural resources, including at international level. 
Področja politik okolje, pomorske zadeve in ribištvo, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov 3.10 PolitikaUnijenapodročjuokoljanajbiprispevalak varovanju in izboljšanju kakovosti okolja in zdravja ljudi ter k izboljšanju racionalne porabe naravnih virov tudi na medna­ rodni ravni.
The Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE)(14) is the most important instrument in terms of funding covering the EU contribution for projects in the Member States in favour of nature and biodiversity, as well as environment policy, governance, information and communication. 
Finančni instrument za okolje (LIFE) (14) je najpo­ membnejši instrument financiranja iz sredstev EU za projekte v državah članicah na področju narave in biotske raznovrstnosti ter okoljske politike, upravljanja, informiranja in komunici­ ranja.
The European Fisheries Fund(15) is the main instrument for the policy area Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. 
3.11 Evropski sklad za ribištvo(15) je najpomembnejši instrument za področje politik pomorske zadeve in ribištvo.
The Common Fisheries Policy pursues the same objectives as the Common Agricultural Policy (see paragraph 3.3). 
Skupna ribiška politika ima enake cilje kot skupna kmetijska politika (glej odstavek 3.3).
Concerning Health and Consumer Protection, the EU contributes, on the one hand, to human, animal and plant health protection and, on the other hand, to consumer welfare. _____________ (13) See Article 1 and Article 2(a) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/ 2003. 
3.12 VzvezizzdravjeminvarstvompotrošnikovEUprispevak varovanju zdravja ljudi, živali in rastlin ter k blaginji potroš­ nikov. _____________ (13) Glej člen 1 ter člen 2(a) in (c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
(14) Regulation (EC) No 614/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 149, 9.6.2007, p. 
(14) Uredba (ES) št.
1). (15) The Financial Instrument for the Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) has been replaced by the EFF for the new programming period (2007-2013) – Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 (OJ L 223, 15.8.2006, p. 
1). (15) ESR je v novem programskem obdobju (2007–2013) nadomestil Finančni instrument za usmerjanje ribištva – Uredba Sveta (ES) št.
1). T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.9. According to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006, in addition to the annual accounts, the internal control procedures of the paying agencies are also examined and certified by the certification bodies on an annual basis. 
1198/2006 (UL L 223, 15.8.2006, str. 1). O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.9 V skladu s členom 5 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 61 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Advances and interim/final payments 3.13. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 61 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A Predplačila in vmesna/končna plačila 3.13 Pri EKJS so odhodki večinoma povračilo subvencij, ki jih države članice plačajo kmetom in drugim upravičencem.
ForEAFRDandEFF,anadvancecorrespondingto7% of the EU contribution to each programme was paid after the adoption of the programme by the Commission (16). 
3.14 PriEKSRPinESRjebilopredplačilovvišini7% prispevka EU za vsak program plačano, potem ko je Komisija ta program sprejela (16).
3.15. PaymentsforHealthandConsumerProtectiondonot include advances, Member States are reimbursed on the basis of their declared expenses. 
3.15 Plačila za področje zdravja in varstva potrošnikov niso zajemala predplačil, državam članicam so bila povrnjena na osnovi njihovih prijavljenih odhodkov.
For Environment, pre-financing of up to 40 % of the EU contribution for a LIFE project, as established in the grant agreement, is foreseen. 
Za področje okolja je predvideno predfinanciranje v višini do 40 % prispevka EU za posamezen projekt LIFE, kot je določeno v sporazumu o dona­ ciji.
Budgetary implementation 3.16. IntheareaofEAFRDbudgetaryappropriationsfor 1 650 million were cancelled at the end of 2009 (17) primarily as a consequence of a slowdown in Member States’ expenditure due to difficulties in providing national co-financing and, in the case of Romania and Bulgaria, lack of experience in the implementation of rural development programmes (18). 
Izvrševanje proračuna 3.16 V okviru EKSRP so bila odobrena proračunska sred­ stva v višini 1 650 milijonov EUR na koncu leta 2009 razve­ ljavljena (17) predvsem kot posledica počasnejše porabe v državah članicah zaradi težav pri zagotavljanju nacionalnega sofinanciranja, v Romuniji in Bolgariji pa zaradi pomanjkanja izkušenj z izvajanjem programov razvoja podeželja (18).
Audit scope and approach 3.17. TheCourt’soverallauditapproachandmethodology is described in Part 2 of Annex 1.1. For the audit of policy group Agriculture and Natural Resources the following specific points should be noted: — a sample of 241 payments was tested, _____________ (16) For EFF a second pre-financing amount of 7 % was paid upon request according to Council Regulation (EC) No 744/2008 (OJ L 202, 31.7.2008, p. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 3.17 Celostnipristopinmetodologija,kijujeRačunsko sodišče uporabilo pri reviziji, sta opisana v delu 2 Priloge 1.1. Glede revizije skupine politik kmetijstvo in naravni viri je treba navesti naslednje: — preizkušen je bil vzorec z 241 plačili, _____________ (16) V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št.
(17) Amending budget No 10, adopted by the European Parliament on 16 December 2009. 
(17) Sprememba proračuna št. 10, ki jo je Evropski parlament sprejel 16. decembra 2009.
(18) Budget item 05.04.05.01: the payments amounted to a total of 8 209,4 million euro in 2009. 
(18) Proračunska postavka 05 04 05 01: plačila so leta 2009 skupaj znašala 8 209,4 milijona EUR.
The payment appropriations available in the initial budget amounted to 9 135,3 million euro and a further 774,9 million euro had been carried over from 2008. 
Odobrena proračunska sredstva za plačila v prvotnem proračunu so znašala 9 135,3 milijona EUR, 774,9 milijona EUR pa je bilo prenesenih iz leta 2008.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.16. The cancellation of the EAFRD budgetary appropriations for 1 650 million euro at the end of 2009 was also due to the late initial approval of programmes in a number of cases. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.16 Razlog za odpravo odobritve proračunskih sredstev v okviru EKSRP v višini 1 650 milijonov ob koncu leta 2009 je bila tudi pozna začetna odobritev programov v številnih primerih.
In addition, reprogramming to take account of the Health Check and the European Recovery Package may also have led to some delays in the launch of new projects by Member States pending adoption of the revised Rural Development programmes. 
Poleg tega je lahko nekatere zamude pri začetku novih projektov povzročilo tudi reprogramiranje zaradi upoštevanja pregleda SKP in evropskega paketa za gospodarsko okrevanje, in sicer v državah članicah, ki so čakale na odobritev spremenjenih programov razvoja podeželja.
EN 62 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S — the assessment of supervisory and control systems covered for EAGF selected paying agencies in four Member States applying the SAPS — Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia — and in four Member States applying the SPS: Malta, Greece, Italy (Emilia-Romagna) and Spain (Basque Country). 
SL 62 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A — ocena nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov je pri EKJS zajela izbrane plačilne agencije v štirih državah članicah, ki uporabljajo SEPP – na Cipru, v Latviji, Litvi in na Slova­ škem –, in v štirih državah članicah, ki uporabljajo SEP – na Malti, v Grčiji, Italiji (v Emiliji-Romanji) in Španiji (v Baskiji).
Additionally, in the case of Malta the audit covered the allocation of entitlements following the intro­ duction of SPS in 2007. 
Poleg tega je za Malto revizija zajela tudi dodelitev pravic po uvedbi SEP leta 2007.
For Rural Development expenditure, the Court tested the supervisory and control systems in Austria, Germany (Bavaria), United Kingdom (England), Greece, Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria and France. 
Za odhodke za razvoj podeželja je Sodišče preizkusilo nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme v Avstriji, Nemčiji (na Bavarskem), Združenem kraljestvu (v Angliji), Grčiji, na Češkem, v Romuniji, Bolga­ riji in Franciji.
For Health and Consumer Protection the Court audited super­ visory and control systems relating to the animal disease eradication and monitoring programmes, — as regards cross compliance, when auditing area related payments the Court limits its testing to GAEC obligations (minimum soil cover, encroachment of unwanted vegetation) for which evidence can be obtained and a conclusion reached at the time of the audit visit. 
Za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov je Sodišče revidiralo nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme, povezane s programi za izkoreninjenje in spremljanje živalskih bolezni, — Sodišče je v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo pri revidiranju plačil, vezanih na površino, svoje preizkušanje omejilo na obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz standardov za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje (minimalna talna odeja, širitev nezaželene vegetacije), za katere je mogoče v času revizijskega obiska pridobiti dokaze in priti do zaključka.
Certain statutory management requirements (protection of groundwater and soil against pollution, animal identifi­ cation and animal welfare) were tested in respect of EAFRD payments. 
V zvezi s plačili EKSRP so bile preizkušene nekatere predpisane zahteve ravnanja (varstvo podzemne vode in tal pred onesnaževa­ njem, identifikacija živali in dobro počutje živali).