natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
45 The Commission considers that it is most relevant to focus climate tracking on commitment appropriations/pro-grammed and adopted spending, given that expenditure data would not provide useful information for improving mainstreaming due to the time delay in moving from programming to expenditure. 
45 Komisija meni, da se je pri spremljanju podnebnih ukrepov najpomembneje osredotočiti na odobritve za sprejem obveznosti/načrtovano in sprejeto porabo, saj podatki o odhodkih ne bi zagotovili uporabnih informacij za izboljšanje vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov zaradi časovnega zamika pri prehodu z načrtovanja na odhodke.
The Commission also considers that tracking financial inputs from the EU budget cannot meaningfully be put into a causal relationship with achieving EU climate and energy targets or any estimated level of investment needs. 
Komisija prav tako meni, da spremljanja finančnih prispevkov iz proračuna EU ni mogoče smiselno postaviti v vzročni odnos z doseganjem ciljev EU glede podnebja in energije ali z ocenjenimi stopnjami potreb po naložbah.
Introducing a tracking approach at the level of the programmed expenditure was the first natural and essential step to better integrate climate considerations in all EU programmes. 
Uvedba spremljanja na ravni načrtovanih odhodkov je bil prvi naravni in bistveni korak za boljše vključevanje podnebnih vprašanj v vse programe EU.
The inherent risk the Court identifies is present in all budget plans. 
Notranje tveganje, ki ga ugotavlja Sodišče, je prisotno v vseh proračunskih načrtih.
The Commission agrees with the Court that planned expenditure does not always translate into payments, but points out that on average 97 % of total 2015 EU budget commitments are realised, which makes the existing system of ex ante commitment tracking an efficient proxy also for spending. 
Komisija se strinja s Sodiščem, da se načrtovani odhodki ne odrazijo vedno v plačilih, vendar poudarja, da je v povprečju 97 % obveznosti skupnega proračuna EU za leto 2015 uresničenih, zaradi česar je obstoječi sistem predhodnega spremljanja obveznosti učinkovit približek tudi za porabo.
Also, the Commission points out that the methodologies used to calculate the 34 % and 49.3 % are different in approach and scope. 
Poleg tega Komisija poudarja, da se metodologiji za izračun deležev 34 % in 49,3 % razlikujeta po pristopu in obsegu.
Reply of the Commission 69 46 The Commission regularly reviews data and reflects changes in programming in the context of the annual budget procedure and of the execution of the annual budget. 
Odgovori Komisije 69 46 Komisija redno pregleduje podatke in upošteva spremembe pri načrtovanju v letnem proračunskem postopku in izvrševanju letnega proračuna.
Also, the Commission committed in the MFF MTR to assessing progress towards the 20 % target in the mid-term reviews of MFF programmes. 
Poleg tega se je Komisija v večletnem finančnem okviru zavezala, da bo ocenjevala napredek pri doseganju cilja 20 % v vmesnih pregledih programov iz večletnega finančnega okvira.
The Commission considers the existing tracking and reporting systems as being appropriate, and does not consider the introduction of any additional reporting requirements to be necessary at this stage. 
Komisija meni, da obstoječi sistemi spremljanja in poročanja niso ustrezni in ne predvidevajo uvedbe dodatnih zahtev za poročanje kot nujnih na tej stopnji.
47 The Commission confirms the 20 % target to be expressly related to the EU budget spending, and considers that it would not be appropriate to mix non-financial elements into tracking a financial target. 
47 Komisija potrjuje, da se cilj 20 % izrecno nanaša na porabo proračuna EU, in meni, da v spremljanje finančnega cilja ne bi bilo primerno vnašati nefinančne elemente.
At the same time, we recognise that the link between spending, mobilised actions, and results should be improved. 
Hkrati se zavedamo, da je povezavo med porabo, izvajanimi ukrepi in rezultati treba izboljšati.
In the context of different spending programmes and depending on the degree to which they focus on investment in climate action, output and result indicators have been set and, for certain common indicators, can be aggregated at EU level. 
V različnih programih porabe in glede na stopnjo njihove usmerjenosti na naložbe v podnebne ukrepe so bili določeni kazalniki dosežkov in rezultatov, pri čemer se lahko nekateri skupni kazalniki združujejo na ravni EU.
Such common indicators have been developed based on policy learning within the specific programme concerned (i.e. an indicator measuring GHG emissions from agriculture is included in the monitoring and evaluation framework of the common agricultural policy (CAP). 
Takšni skupni kazalniki so bili razviti na podlagi seznanjanja s politiko v zadevnem programu (tj. kazalnik za merjenje emisije toplogrednih plinov iz kmetijstva je vključen v okvir spremljanja in ocenjevanja skupne kmetijske politike (SKP).
An ERDF specific output indicator of reduction in GHG emissions is defined for funded infrastructure investments). 
Kazalnik učinka zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki ga uporablja ESRR, je opredeljen za financirane naložbe v infrastrukturo).
That said, it is currently not technically possible to prepare consolidated data on, for instance, reduction in GHG emissions from activities financed through the EU budget. 
Glede na navedeno trenutno tehnično ni mogoče pripraviti konsolidiranih podatkov o, na primer, zmanjšanju emisij toplogrednih plinov iz dejavnosti, ki se financirajo iz proračuna EU.
48 ERDF common indicators have common definitions which are recommended in Commission guidance7, which was discussed with Member State (MS) experts before finalisation. 
48 Skupni kazalniki ESRR imajo skupne opredelitve, ki se priporočajo v smernicah Komisije7, o čemer so pred končnim oblikovanjem razpravljali strokovnjaki držav članic.
While it was possible to propose a methodology for measuring GHG reductions in renewable sand energy savings, there was no consensus and multiple methods available for other such calculation in other domains. 
Čeprav je bilo mogoče predlagati metodologijo za merjenje zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov v prihrankih na področju obnovljivih virov in varčevanja z energijo, glede tega ni bilo soglasja in razpoložljivih metod za druge takšne izračune na drugih področjih.
All data that is collected using common or specific indicators will be available for evaluation and can potentially add to further policy learning. 
Vsi podatki, ki se zbirajo z uporabo skupnih ali posebnih kazalnikov, bodo na voljo za ocenjevanje in jih je mogoče vključiti v nadaljnje seznanjanje s politiko.
49 The Commission considers that progress on climate mainstreaming has been made in most respects and achieving the target is feasible. 
49 Komisija meni, da je bil dosežen napredek pri vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov v večini vidikov in da je uresničenje cilja izvedljivo.
The Commission refers to the recent analysis provided in the MFF MTR published on 14 September (as referred to in its reply to paragraph 28, inter alia) and confirms its intention to continue its efforts to mainstream climate in the EU programmes. 
Komisija se sklicuje na nedavno analizo v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira, ki je bil objavljen 14. septembra (kakor je med drugim navedeno v odgovoru na odstavek 28), in potrjuje, da si bo še naprej prizadevala vključiti podnebne ukrepe v programe EU.
Reply of the Commission 70 50 As announced in the MFF MTR, the Commission points out that it plans to assess progress on the 20 % target in the mid-term reviews of individual programmes, which provide an opportunity to further mainstream climate into the EU spending programmes. 
Odgovori Komisije 70 50 Kot je bilo objavljeno v vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira, Komisija opozarja, da namerava oceniti napredek pri doseganju cilja 20 % v vmesnih pregledih posameznih programov, ki ponujajo priložnost za nadaljnje vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov v programe porabe EU.
51 The Commission reiterates that it does not consider the methodology agreed for the EU climate tracking approach to pose a risk to climate mainstreaming, but takes note of the Court’s simulations using different co-efficients for EU agriculture spending. 
51 Komisija znova poudarja, da se ne strinja, da sprejeta metodologija za spremljanje podnebnih ukrepov na ravni EU ogroža vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov, vendar je seznanjena s simulacijami sodišča z uporabo različnih koeficientov porabe za kmetijstvo EU.
First indent The Commission considers that the method it uses has been prepared in a transparent and coordinated manner; it has been communicated to the European Parliament and the Council and it does not lead to overestimation. 
Prva alinea Komisija meni, da je bila metoda, ki jo uporablja, pripravljena na pregleden in usklajen način; predložena je bila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu in ne vodi v precenjevanje.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 53. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 53.
Second indent Likewise, the climate-coefficients for rural development have been set up in a transparent manner, in line with the political objective of 20 %. 
Druga alinea Prav tako so bili na pregleden način določeni podnebni koeficienti za razvoj podeželja, v skladu s političnim ciljem 20 %.
Third indent The Commission considers that its estimates of the overall climate contribution of both CAP funds is based on an EU agreed methodology, on which full details are provided yearly in the programme statements accompanying the Commission’s draft budget. 
Tretja alinea Komisija meni, da njene ocene celotnega podnebnega prispevka obeh skladov SKP temeljijo na metodologiji, dogovorjeni na ravni EU, o kateri so vse podrobnosti navedene vsako leto v poročilih o programih, ki spremljajo njen osnutek proračuna.
As pointed out in its reply to paragraph 35, the Commission does not consider a set of principles developed by a group of international aid organisations in 2015 for mitigation tracking of their operations to be a relevant point of reference for the approach agreed at EU level. 
Kot je bilo poudarjeno v odgovoru na odstavek 35, Komisija meni, da sklop načel, ki jih je leta 2015 postavila skupina mednarodnih organizacij za pomoč za spremljanje svojih dejavnosti pomoči za blažitev podnebnih sprememb, ni ustrezno izhodišče za pristop, ki je bil dogovorjen na ravni EU.
The Commission underlines that the Court’s calculations used in the report differ from the ones agreed at EU level which are sufficiently conservative. 
Komisija poudarja, da se izračuni Sodišča, uporabljeni v poročilu, razlikujejo od tistih, dogovorjenih na ravni EU, ki so dovolj konzervativni.
Fourth indent Horizon 2020 represents a considerable increase in research of this field as regards FP7. 
Četrta alinea Program Obzorje 2020 prinaša znatno povečanje raziskav na tem področju, kar zadeva sedmi okvirni program (7.
The ‘Cooperation’ part of FP7 is estimated to have contributed EUR 2.4 bn to climate action (2007-2013), whereas for only the first 2 years (2014-2015) of Horizon 2020 the figure is EUR 3.2 bn. 
OP je po ocenah prispeval za podnebne ukrepe 2,4 milijarde EUR (2007–2013), medtem ko je pri programu Obzorje 2020 samo za prvi dve leti (2014–2015) ta prispevek znašal 3,2 milijarde EUR.
Nevertheless, an action plan for a further boost in this respect is already in place (see Commission reply to paragraph 60) in order to reach the projected spending level (as indicative target) set out in the Horizon 2020 regulation. 
Kljub temu akcijski načrt za dodatno spodbudo na tem področju že poteka (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 60), da bi bila dosežena načrtovana raven porabe (kot okvirni cilj), določena v uredbi o programu Obzorje 2020.
Reply of the Commission 71 53 The Commission takes note of the Court’s simulations using different methodologies and general principles agreed by some international aid organisations, but reiterates its commitment to the EU approach. 
Odgovori Komisije 71 53 Komisija je seznanjena s simulacijami Sodišča z uporabo različnih metodologij in splošnih načel, dogovorjenih v nekaterih mednarodnih organizacijah za pomoč, vendar ponovno poudarja svojo zavezanost k pristopu EU.
The method used by the Commission is sound, it has been prepared in a transparent and coordinated manner; it is based on Rio markers and it was communicated to the European Parliament and the Council. 
Metoda, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, je zanesljiva in je bila pripravljena na pregleden in usklajen način: temelji na kazalnikih iz Ria in je bila predložena Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The benefit of cross compliance for climate actions can be assessed by applying a Rio marker of 40 % to a share of 20 % of non-greening direct payments. 
Korist navzkrižne skladnosti za podnebne ukrepe je mogoče oceniti na podlagi uporabe kazalnika iz Ria 40 % za delež 20 % neposrednih plačil za nezeleno komponento.
As for any other calculation this is a proxy, based on the penalty system of cross compliance. 
Kot pri vsakem drugem izračunu je to približek, ki temelji na sistemu kazni za kršitve navzkrižne skladnosti.
However, the Commission considers that a climate impact of 8 % of non-greening direct payments is not overestimated considering the benefits of cross compliance and direct payments for the climate. 
Vendar pa Komisija meni, da podnebni vpliv 8 % neposrednih plačil za nezeleno komponento ni precenjen glede na koristi, ki jih prinašajo navzkrižna skladnost in neposredna plačila za podnebje.
See Commission reply to paragraph 51. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 51.
Box 3 — Lack of appropriate justification for non-greening direct payments’ climate contribution See Commission reply to paragraph 51. 
Okvir 3 – Ni ustrezne utemeljitve za prispevek neposrednih plačil nezelene komponente k podnebnim ukrepom Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 51.
54 The Commission considers that the elements applied are sufficiently conservative. 
54 Komisija meni, da so tukaj uporabljani elementi dovolj konzervativni.
See Commission reply to paragraph 51, first indent. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 51, prva alinea.
55 The climate tracking of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) expenditure follows the principle of applying a marker to policy objectives, as expressed in rural development Union priorities and focus areas. 
55 Spremljanje porabe Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) za podnebne ukrepe izhaja iz načela uporabe kazalnika za politične cilje, kot je navedeno v prednostnih nalogah in področjih Unije za razvoj podeželja.
Since MS can programme measures in a flexible manner, depending on their expected contribution to these different objectives, tracking needs to be carried out at the level of these EAFRD priorities rather than at measure level. 
Ker lahko države članice načrtujejo ukrepe na prilagodljiv način, glede na svoj pričakovani prispevek k tem različnim ciljem, je treba spremljanje izvajati na ravni teh prednostnih nalog EKSRP in ne na ravni ukrepov.
Due to this intervention logic and the principle of shared management it is the Member States which determine which priority or focus area a measure contributes to most. 
Zaradi te logike posredovanja in načela deljenega upravljanja so države članice tiste, ki določijo, h katerim prednostnim nalogam ali področjem ukrep najbolj prispeva.
As an example, measure 13 under the areas facing natural constraints (ANC) scheme has been programmed under four different priorities/focus areas. 
Tako je bil na primer ukrep 13 v shemi za območja z naravnimi omejitvami načrtovan za 4 različne prednostne naloge/prednostna področja.
Those MS which have programmed measure 13 under priority four consider it more relevant for achieving the objectives of this priority. 
Tiste države članice, ki imajo načrtovan ukrep 13 v okviru prednostne naloge 4, imajo ta ukrep za pomembnejšega za uresničevanje ciljev v zvezi s to prednostno nalogo.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 56, 57, 58 and Box 4 The Commission takes note of the Court’s reflections on the shortcomings of the tracking methodology for the EAFRD and the simulations based on different approaches. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke 56, 57 in 58 ter okvir 4 Komisija je seznanjena z razmišljanji Sodišča o pomanjkljivosti metodologije spremljanja za EKSRP in simulacijami na podlagi različnih pristopov.
The current tracking methodology for EAFRD tries to strike a balance between providing a reasonably reliable estimate for climate related expenditure and minimising the administrative burden and costs. 
Sedanja metodologija spremljanja za EKSRP skuša najti ravnotežje med zagotavljanjem dovolj zanesljive ocene odhodkov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, in zmanjšanjem upravnih bremen in stroškov na najmanjšo mero.
Reply of the Commission 72 The Court’s proposed approach of applying different climate coefficients to different measures/operations within specific focus areas and Union Priorities would increase the accuracy, but would also lead to an increase of the administrative burden on national and regional administrations. 
Odgovori Komisije 72 Predlagani pristop Sodišča ob uporabi različnih podnebnih koeficientov za ukrepe/dejavnosti na posebnih prednostnih področjih in na podlagi prednostnih nalog Unije bi povečal točnost, vendar bi tudi privedel do povečanja upravnega bremena za nacionalne in regionalne uprave.
Priority 4 should be attributed a 100 % marker since it includes measures which contribute to protecting the environment and strengthening the resilience of ecosystems to adapt to climate change. 
Prednostni nalogi 4 je treba dodeliti kazalnik 100 %, saj vključuje ukrepe, ki prispevajo k varstvu okolja in krepitvi odpornosti ekosistemov za prilagajanje na podnebne spremembe.
Taken into account the variety, diversity and complexity of operations under Union priority 4 (e.g. agri-environment and climate measures) a differentiation by measure/operation would render the tracking exercise burdensome and difficult for Member States. 
Ob upoštevanju raznovrstnosti, raznolikosti in zapletenosti dejavnosti na podlagi prednostne naloge 4 Unije (npr. kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi in podnebni ukrepi) bi razlikovanje po ukrepih/dejavnostih obremenilo in otežilo spremljanje v državah članicah.
The ANC measure (areas facing natural constraints) in EAFRD is important to prevent land abandonment and maintain the environmental and economic value of farming the areas under natural constraints. 
Ukrep za območja z naravnimi omejitvami v EKSRP je pomemben za preprečevanje opuščanja zemljišč ter ohranjanje okoljske in gospodarske vrednosti kmetijstva na območjih z naravnimi omejitvami.
It helps to maintain agricultural ecosystems which could be lost without support which is important in the context of both climate change adaptation and mitigation (e.g. pastures). 
Prispeva k ohranjanju kmetijskih ekosistemov, ki bi bili lahko izgubljeni brez podpore, kar je pomembno za prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam in njihovo blažitev (npr. pašniki).
The new designation approach based on commonly agreed biophysical criteria to be set up during the current programming period will lead to a stronger focus on keeping the most vulnerable agricultural land farmed and thus increase the importance of the measure for climate change mitigation and adaptation. 
Nov pristop k označevanju na podlagi dogovorjenih biofizikalnih meril, ki bodo vzpostavljena v sedanjem programskem obdobju, bo povečal usmerjenost na ohranjanje najobčutljivejših kmetijskih obdelovanih zemljišč in s tem pomen ukrepov za blažitev podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanje nanje.
59 The Commission considers that the specific tracking methodologies specified in the Programme Statement of EAFRD and LIFE Programme referred to in this paragraph have been agreed within the EU tracking methodology which was developed to be used over the current programming period. 
59 Komisija meni, da so bile posebne metodologije spremljanja, opredeljene v poročilu o programu EKSRP in programu LIFE iz tega odstavka, dogovorjene znotraj metodologije EU za spremljanje, ki je bila razvita za uporabo v sedanjem programskem obdobju.
60 Horizon 2020 represents a considerable increase in research of this field as regards FP7. 
60 Program Obzorje 2020 prinaša znatno povečanje raziskav na tem področju, kar zadeva sedmi okvirni program (7.
While direct comparisons of the whole programme are not possible, the ‘Cooperation’ part of FP7 is estimated to have contributed EUR 2.4 bn to climate action over the 7 years of the programme (2007-2013), whereas the last validated figures for only the first 2 years (2014-2015) of the comparable ‘programmable’ parts of Horizon 2020 are EUR 3.2 bn. 
Čeprav neposredne primerjave celotnega programa niso mogoče, je del „Sodelovanje“ v 7. OP po ocenah v sedmih letih programa (2007–2013) prispeval za podnebne ukrepe 2,4 milijarde EUR, medtem ko je po zadnjih potrjenih podatkih ta prispevek samo v dveh letih (2014–2015) primerljivih „načrtovalnih“ delov programa Obzorje 2020 znašal 3,2 milijarde EUR.
Therefore, although the current figures are below the initial projected spending level, they do represent a positive signal of the Commission’s commitment. 
Čeprav so torej trenutne številke nižje od prvotno načrtovane ravni porabe, vseeno pomenijo pozitiven znak zavezanosti Komisije.
The Introductions to the ‘main’ Work Programmes for 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 have provided clear indications on climate-related expenditure through relevant references to calls/topics, where appropriate. 
Uvodi v „glavne“ delovne programe za obdobji 2014–2015 in 2016–2017 so zagotovili jasne podatke o odhodkih, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, z ustreznimi sklici na razpise/teme, kjer je to primerno.
In this context, the Commission services have been carefully and continuously monitoring all Horizon 2020 work programme topics in terms of climate-related expenditure to measure the progress towards Horizon 2020 projected spending level. 
V povezavi s tem so službe Komisije skrbno in redno spremljale vse teme delovnega programa Obzorje 2020 glede odhodkov, povezanih s podnebnimi ukrepi, za merjenje napredka programa Obzorje 2020 pri doseganju načrtovane ravni porabe.
The action plan launched last year gives a further boost in this respect. 
Akcijski načrt, ki je bil objavljen lani, daje dodatno spodbudo v tej smeri.
Moreover, the ongoing 2018-2020 strategic programming process recognises the importance of mainstreaming climate action and increasing related expenditure. 
Poleg tega sedanji postopek strateškega načrtovanja programov za obdobje 2018–2020 upošteva pomen vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov in povečanja odhodkov v zvezi s tem.
Once the strategic programming process has been finalised, more quantitative aspects for 2018-2020 can be addressed. 
Ko bo postopek strateškega načrtovanja programov dokončan, bo mogoče obravnavati več kvantitativnih vidikov za obdobje 2018–2020.
Reply of the Commission 73 61 The contribution of bottom-up initiatives to climate action cannot be established until the individual projects have been selected for funding and may well vary year on year. 
Odgovori Komisije 73 61 Prispevka pobud „od spodaj navzgor“ k podnebnim ukrepom ni mogoče določiti, dokler ne bodo izbrani posamezni projekti za financiranje, in se lahko spreminja iz leta v leto.
62 The Commission is closely monitoring the progress of this indicator and still has some margin of manoeuvre. 
62 Komisija pozorno spremlja napredek tega kazalnika in ima še vedno nekaj manevrskega prostora.
By the time the next Work Programmes are approved (ca. autumn 2017) the Commission will have updated figures to determine more accurately the state of play and the budget required for the years 2018-2020. 
Do odobritve naslednjih delovnih programov (približno jeseni 2017) bo imela Komisija posodobljene podatke in bo lahko natančneje opredelila stanje in potrebni proračun za obdobje 2018–2020.