natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The monitoring of the European Structural and Investment Funds takes to a large extent into account the 2020 connectivity objectives of the Digital Agenda for Europe but, as described in paragraph 33, it did not allow to quantify separately its impact on the roll out of fast and ultrafast networks. 
2 3
The Commission notes that the EIB's support is not meant to focus on areas where grant-type public sector intervention is most needed. 
Komisija opozarja, da podpora Evropske investicijske banke (EIB) ne bi smela biti osredotočena na območja, na katerih je ukrepanje javnega sektorja v obliki nepovratnih sredstev najbolj potrebno.
The EIB notes that the EFSI Regulation requires EFSI projects to be economically viable and therefore is not designed to address exclusively those areas where market failure is significant. 
EIB opozarja, da morajo biti v skladu z uredbo o skladu EFSI projekti EFSI ekonomsko izvedljivi, torej ni namenjena izključni obravnavi tistih območij, na katerih vlada znatno nedelovanje trga.
First bullet: See Commission reply to recommendation (2). 
Prva alinea: glej odgovor Komisije na priporočilo (2).
Second bullet: See Commission replies to recommendations (5), (6) and (7). 
Druga alinea: glej odgovore Komisije na priporočila (5), (6) in (7).
Third bullet: See EIB and Commission replies to recommendation (8). 
Tretja alinea: glej odgovora EIB in Komisije na priporočilo (8).
In the meantime, more ambitious targets for 2025 were introduced in the Commission Communication "Towards a Gigabit Society" and the concept of very high capacity network was included in the Commission's legislative proposal for a European Electronic Communications Code. 
Medtem so bile v sporočilu Komisije z naslovom Gigabitni družbi naproti uvedene bolj ambiciozne ciljne vrednosti za leto 2025, pojem zelo visokozmogljivega omrežja pa je bil vključen v zakonodajni predlog Komisije o Evropskem zakoniku o elektronskih komunikacijah.
The five types of infrastructure mentioned by the ECA deliver different levels of broadband connectivity. 
Pet vrst infrastrukture, ki jih je navedlo Evropsko računsko sodišče, zagotavlja različne ravni širokopasovne povezljivosti.
At the current stage of market and technological developments, only the following technologies mentioned in Table 1 are considered to be able to deliver fast broadband connectivity above 30 Mbps: (i) fibre-based access networks (FTTx); (ii) advanced upgraded cable networks; and (iii) certain advanced wireless access networks capable of delivering reliable high speeds per subscriber. 
Na trenutni stopnji tržnega in tehnološkega razvoja se le za naslednje tehnologije iz tabele1 šteje, da omogočajo hitro širokopasovno povezljivost nad 30Mb/s: (i) optična dostopovna omrežja (FTTx), (ii) napredna nadgrajena kabelska omrežja in (iii) nekatera napredna brezžična dostopovna omrežja, ki omogočajo zanesljivo zagotavljanje zelo hitrih storitev na naročnika.
The Commission recalls that the targets identified in the Digital Agenda for Europe Communication are not legally binding for the Member States. 
Komisija opozarja, da ciljne vrednosti, opredeljene v sporočilu z naslovom Evropska digitalna agenda, za države članice niso pravno zavezujoče.
The Commission has encouraged Member States to adopt these ambitious goals when developing their national or regional broadband plans. 
Komisija je spodbujala države članice, naj te ambiciozne cilje sprejmejo pri pripravi svojih nacionalnih ali regionalnih načrtov za širokopasovne povezave.
The Commission launched a three years project aimed at the development of a platform gathering existing data on mapping broadband coverage, and quality of service and experience from NRAs, Ministries and relevant international platforms (https://www.broadbandmapping.eu/). 
Komisija je začela izvajati triletni projekt, namenjen razvoju platforme, ki od nacionalnih regionalnih organov, ministrstev in ustreznih mednarodnih platform zbira obstoječe podatke o kartiranju širokopasovne pokritosti ter o kakovosti storitev in izkušnjah (https://www.broadbandmapping.eu/).
The platform aims to go live in 2018 when data will be shown under different layers due to the lack of common methodologies across Europe. 
Platforma naj bi začela delovati leta 2018, ko bodo podatki prikazani na različnih ravneh zaradi pomanjkanja skupne metodologije v Evropi.
In parallel, the BEREC Net Neutrality working group has developed a methodology for assessing Net Neutrality enabling the measuring of the quality of service and experience and is currently in course of developing a tool to test the methodology (2018-2019) and propose the tool to NRAs at a later stage. 
Sočasno je delovna skupina za internetno nevtralnost Organa evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije (BEREC) razvila metodo za ocenjevanje internetne nevtralnosti, ki omogoča merjenje kakovosti storitev in izkušenj, trenutno pa razvija orodje za preskušanje metodologije (2018–2019), ki ga bo pozneje predlagala nacionalnim regulativnim organom.
The Commission has also initiated work to develop a common methodology on mapping coverage of broadband services taking into account the 2025 gigabit ambition targets and the concept of Very 1 High Capacity Networks (VHCN) where additional attributes other than download speed will be included. 
Komisija je tudi začela delo za razvoj skupne metodologije za kartiranje pokritosti s širokopasovnimi storitvami, pri čemer je upoštevala cilje glede gigabitne povezljivosti za leto 2025 ter pojem zelo visokozmogljivih omrežij (VHCN), ki bo poleg hitrosti prenosa podatkov s strežnika vključeval tudi druge lastnosti.
This work aims to support action 3 of the Rural Broadband Action Plan1 (earlier referred to as Rural toolkit) on the design a "common methodology" for planning, reporting, monitoring of broadband investments (see also Commission reply to paragraph 31). 
To delo naj bi podprlo ukrep 3 akcijskega načrta za širokopasovne povezave na podeželju1 (prej imenovanega „sklop orodij za podeželje“) o oblikovanju „skupne metodologije“ za načrtovanje in spremljanje naložb v širokopasovne povezave ter poročanje o njih (glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 31).
The monitoring of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) takes to a large extent into account the 2020 connectivity objectives of the Digital Agenda for Europe but, as described in paragraph 33, does not allow to quantify separately its impact on the roll out of fast and ultrafast networks. 
Pri spremljanju evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov (skladov ESI) se večinoma upoštevajo cilji povezljivosti Evropske digitalne agende do leta 2020, vendar, kot je opisano v odstavku 33, ni mogoče ločeno količinsko opredeliti njenega učinka na uvedbo hitrih in ultra hitrih omrežij.
The Commission acknowledges that monitoring of expenditure and result in ESIF could be improved to better reflect EU broadband targets. 
Komisija priznava, da bi bilo mogoče izboljšati spremljanje izdatkov in rezultata v okviru skladov ESI, da bi bolje izražali ciljne vrednosti EU glede širokopasovnih povezav.
In this respect, the Commission Rural Broadband action plan launched in November 2017, under the coordinated initiative of DGs CNECT, AGRI, REGIO and COMP, includes the development of a common methodology to help plan, report and monitor broadband investments and EU support in addition to measures to help bringing enhanced broadband in rural areas of the EU, including missions to Member States and regions with low level of rural broadband coverage. 
V zvezi s tem akcijski načrt Komisije za širokopasovne povezave na podeželju, ki se je začel izvajati novembra 2017 v okviru usklajene pobude generalnih direktoratov za komunikacijska omrežja, vsebine in tehnologijo (GD CNECT), za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja (GD AGRI), za regionalno in mestno politiko (GD REGIO) ter za konkurenco (GD COMP), vključuje razvoj skupne metodologije, ki bo pomagala pri načrtovanju in spremljanju naložb v širokopasovne povezave in poročanju o njih, in podporo EU, poleg ukrepov za povečanje dostopa do širokopasovnih povezav na podeželskih območjih EU, vključno z misijami v države članice in regije z nizko stopnjo pokritosti širokopasovnih storitev na podeželju.
The Commission closely monitors developments in the broadband market and publishes a number of indicators that have evolved over time and currently look at different aspects. 
Komisija skrbno spremlja razvoj na širokopasovnem trgu in objavlja številne kazalnike, ki so se skozi čas spreminjali in trenutno obravnavajo različne vidike.
While 100 Mbps coverage and take-up data were already available, they were not included in the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). 
Čeprav so bili podatki o pokritosti s širokopasovnimi povezavami hitrosti 100 Mb/s in naročninah že na voljo, niso bili vključeni v indeks digitalnega gospodarstva in družbe (DESI).
DESI country profiles for 2018 will include ultrafast broadband (of at least 100 Mbps) coverage and take-up. 
Profili držav DESI za leto 2018 bodo vključevali pokritost z ultra hitro širokopasovno povezavo (vsaj 100 Mb/s) in naročnine.
For the sake of simplification a limited number of common output indicators were used in the 2014-20 Programming period. 
Zaradi poenostavitve je bilo v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 uporabljeno omejeno število skupnih kazalnikov izložkov.
Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) foresees the use as common output indicator for ICT Infrastructure of "Additional households with broadband access of at least 30 Mbps" in line with the first of the two 2020 targets set out in the Digital Agenda for Europe (DAE). 
1301/2013 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) je za infrastrukturo IKT predvidena uporaba skupnega kazalnika izložka „dodatna gospodinjstva, ki imajo širokopasovni dostop do interneta s hitrostjo najmanj 30 Mb/s“ v skladu s prvim od dveh ciljev za leto 2020 iz Evropske digitalne agende.
This indicator was considered the most comprehensive to capture the result of all projects supporting the roll out of fast and ultrafast broadband. 
Za ta kazalnik se je štelo, da je najcelovitejši in da lahko zajame rezultat vseh projektov, ki podpirajo uvedbo hitre in zelo hitre širokopasovne povezave.
As indicated above, the Commission acknowledges that monitoring of results in ESIF could be improved to better reflect EU broadband targets. 
Kot je že navedeno, Komisija priznava, da bi bilo mogoče izboljšati spremljanje rezultatov v okviru skladov ESI, da bi bolje izražali ciljne vrednosti EU glede širokopasovnih povezav.
As reported in the 2016 European Digital Progress Report, the procurement process launched by the Irish government in December 2015 in the context of the implementation of the Plan referred to by the ECA has faced many challenges, inter alia, with regards to the mapping of the intervention area The Commission (DG COMP) provided all the necessary guidance to the Irish Authorities to ensure that the identification of the intervention zone was carried out in accordance with State Aid rules. 
Kot se je poročalo v poročilu o digitalnem napredku v Evropi za leto 2016, so bili pri postopku javnega naročanja, ki ga je irska vlada začela decembra 2015 v okviru izvajanja načrta, na katerega se sklicuje Računsko sodišče, prisotni mnogi izzivi, med drugim v zvezi s kartiranjem območja posredovanja. Komisija (GD COMP) je irskim organom zagotovila vse potrebne smernice za zagotovitev, da se je območje posredovanja opredelilo v skladu s pravili o državni pomoči.
The Commission continues to follow closely the Irish Plan and provide guidance to the Irish Authorities when requested. 
Komisija še naprej natančno spremlja irski načrt in irskim organom na zahtevo zagotavlja smernice.
As is the rule in the case of such contacts, all discussions remain confidential. 
Kot je pravilo v primeru takih stikov, ostanejo vse razprave zaupne.
The Commission worked closely with the German authorities to deliver the required State Aid clearance. 
Komisija je tesno sodelovala z nemškimi organi, da bi zagotovila zahtevano odobritev državne pomoči.
The length of these procedures results from the insufficient information provided by the German authorities and is not attributable to the Commission. 
Postopki so bili dolgotrajni, ker so nemški organi predložili nezadostne informacije, in ne zaradi Komisije.
In case of Poland, the Commission recognises the problem of the under-use of the regional backbone broadband networks built in the 2007-2013 programming period. 
V primeru Poljske Komisija priznava težavo glede premajhne uporabe regionalnih hrbteničnih širokopasovnih omrežij, ki so bila vzpostavljena v programskem obdobju 2007–2013.
In order to address this problem, a series of meetings and workshops were organised by the Polish Authorities to promote the better use of the network. 
Poljski organi so za odpravo te težave organizirali vrsto srečanj in delavnic, da bi spodbudili boljšo izkoriščenost omrežja.
Although this cooperation was initiated in the context of the implementation of the Operational Programme Digital Poland, the Commission would like to highlight that it is for the national regulator to provide the investment areas under the OP in order to assure best usage of the EU funds. 
Čeprav se je to sodelovanje začelo v okviru izvajanja operativnega programa Digitalna Poljska, želi Komisija poudariti, da mora nacionalni regulator zagotoviti področja naložb v okviru operativnega programa, da bi se sredstva EU čim bolje porabila.
The Commission commissioned a Study report ("Public Investment for High Speed Internet in Germany. 
Komisija je naročila poročilo o študiji („Javne naložbe v hitri internet v Nemčiji.
Study Report on Broadband in Germany") about German studies from 2011-13, which assesses in detail national financing needs for broadband rollout and support by German authorities in the development of their broadband strategy, including the size of necessary broadband funds. 
Poročilo o študiji o širokopasovni povezavi v Nemčiji“), v katerem so zbrane nemške študije iz obdobja 2011– 2013 ter podrobno ocenjene nacionalne potrebe po financiranju za uvedbo širokopasovne povezave in podpora nemških organov pri pripravi njihove širokopasovne strategije, vključno z obsegom sredstev, potrebnih za širokopasovno povezavo.
See Commission reply to paragraph 44. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 44.
The Fund will focus on making investments averaging around EUR 15 million, but effectively the underlying projects will be larger given the fund’s focus on minority shares in the projects it will invest in. 
Sklad se bo osredotočil na naložbe, ki bodo v povprečju znašale 15 milijonov EUR, vendar bodo povezani projekti dejansko večji glede na to, da se bo sklad osredotočal na manjšinske deleže v projektih, v katere bo vlagal.
The Commission notes that the focus of EFSI support is on projects demonstrating additionality which is reflected, inter alia, in the classification of the project as being 'Special Activity' (i.e. higher risk). 
Komisija opozarja, da je podpora sklada EFSI osredotočena na projekte, ki dokazujejo dodatnost, kar se med drugim izraža v opredelitvi projekta kot „posebna dejavnost“ (tj. višje tveganje).
Moreover, the EIB indicates that if this operation had been done under EIB Special Activity, it would have meant that other projects could not have been supported under Special Activity, due to the limited size of EIB Special Activities absent of EFSI (EUR 4bn/year versus EUR20bn/year). 
Če bi bila ta operacija izvedena v okviru posebne dejavnosti EIB, bi to po navedbah EIB pomenilo, da zaradi omejenega obsega posebnih dejavnosti EIB brez sklada EFSI v okviru posebne dejavnosti ne bi bilo mogoče podpreti drugih projektov (4 milijarde EUR/letno v primerjavi z 20milijardamiEUR letno).
The EIB notes that as far as the EFSI eligible project costs are concerned, the non-subsidised areas included were insufficiently served with NGA, (either NGA white or NGA grey). 
Glede stroškov projekta, upravičenega do podpore skladaEFSI, Evropska investicijska banka ugotavlja, da vključena nesubvencionirana območja niso bila dovolj pokrita z dostopovnimi omrežji naslednje generacije (next generation access – NGA) (bele lise NGA ali sive lise NGA).
The promoter had to make a significant investment to deploy FTTH/C and a novel technology on a large scale. 
Nosilec je moral vložiti precej sredstev, da je v velikem obsegu uvedel omrežje FTTH/C in novo tehnologijo.
EFSI caters for technology-induced risk, as usual with innovation projects. 
Sklad EFSI omogoča tehnološka tveganja, kot je običajno pri inovativnih projektih.
Moreover, without EFSI the Bank could not have supported a project of this size with such a tenor that was necessary to ensure an acceleration of national rollout of NGA broadband technology. 
Poleg tega Banka brez sklada EFSI ne bi mogla podpreti tako obsežnega projekta s tako vsebino, ki je bil potreben za pospešitev nacionalne uvedbe tehnologije širokopasovnih dostopovnih omrežij naslednje generacije.
The Commission notes that the CEBF is expected to be launched in the first half of 2018. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da bi moral CEBF začeti delovati v prvi polovici leta 2018.
The fund manager is currently in progress of raising the private sector investments. 
Upravljavec sklada trenutno zbira naložbe zasebnega sektorja.
The Commission notes that the investment period of the CEBF is still under discussion between the anchor investors and the Fund Manager. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da se temeljni vlagatelji in upravljavec sklada še dogovarjajo o naložbenem obdobju CEBF.
Furthermore, the draft investment guidelines of the CEBF state that the Fund shall seek to provide financing complementary to existing EU financial instruments and other financings currently available in the market through public or private financial institutions (not only EIB) to the reasonable knowledge of the Manager. 
Poleg tega je v osnutku smernic za naložbe CEBF navedeno, da si Sklad prizadeva zagotavljati financiranje, ki dopolnjuje obstoječe finančne instrumente EU, in druga finančna sredstva, o katerih je upravljavec razumno seznanjen, da so trenutno na voljo na trgu prek javnih ali zasebnih finančnih institucij (ne le EIB).
The CEBF is expected to provide equity-type financing whereas the EIB direct intervention is usually in the form of debt. 
CEBF naj bi zagotovil vlaganje v lastniški kapital, neposredni ukrep EIB pa je običajno v obliki dolga.
Equity–type financing represents typically a smaller – high-risk - fraction of total project costs compared to debt financing. 
Vlaganje v lastniški kapital običajno pomeni manjši delež – z visokim tveganjem – skupnih stroškov projekta v primerjavi s financiranjem dolga.
Moreover, the CEBF is expected to support projects with more difficult access to finance. 
Poleg tega naj bi CEBF podpiral projekte s težjim dostopom do financiranja.
Therefore, the Commission considers that the contribution expected from the CEBF has important precedent value for financing in the sector including by private sector investors. 
Komisija zato meni, da ima prispevek, ki se pričakuje od CEBF, pomembno precedenčno vrednost za financiranje v sektorju, vključno s strani vlagateljev zasebnega sektorja.
In its proposal for revised EU telecom rules the Commission has proposed enhanced provisions on the independence and regulatory capacity of National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) responsible for ex ante market regulation, including available resources. 
Komisija je v svojem predlogu o revidiranih predpisih EU o telekomunikacijah predlagala okrepljene določbe o neodvisnosti in regulativni zmogljivosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov, odgovornih za predhodno urejanje trga, vključno z razpoložljivimi sredstvi.
The obligation for Member States to ensure that NRAs have adequate financial and human resources to fulfil their tasks that is already part of the current Regulatory Framework is foreseen again in Article 6(2) of the proposed European Code for Electronic Communications. 
Obveznost držav članic, da zagotovijo, da imajo nacionalni regulativni organi za opravljanje svojih nalog ustrezna finančna sredstva in človeške vire, ki je že del veljavnega regulativnega okvira, je ponovno predvidena v členu 6(2) predlaganega Evropskega zakonika o elektronskih komunikacijah.
Moreover, to ensure that NRAs have the necessary powers to enforce their decisions, the Commission proposed that, within the limits of national 3 constitutional law, NRAs have the power to directly impose penalties. 
Da bi se nacionalnim regulativnim organom zagotovila potrebna pooblastila za izvrševanje njihovih odločitev, je Komisija predlagala tudi, da bi se ti organi pooblastili, da v mejah nacionalnega ustavnega prava neposredno naložijo kazni.
Not all NRAs have direct enforcement powers currently. 
Za zdaj neposrednih izvršilnih pooblastil nimajo vsi nacionalni regulativni organi.
First bullet: The Federal Network Agency in charge of ensuring the implementation of the switching rules has imposed fines on four large telecom companies (representing around 70 percent of the total number of complaints). 
Prva alinea: zvezna agencija za omrežja, ki je pristojna za zagotavljanje izvajanja pravil za zamenjavo, je naložila globe štirim velikim telekomunikacijskim družbam (kar pomeni približno 70 % skupnega števila pritožb).
Complaints have decreased to 43 000 complaints in the first 8 months of 2017 (from 83 000 in 2016 (full year data)). 
Število pritožb se je v prvih osmih mesecih leta 2017 zmanjšalo na 43 000 pritožb (s 83 000 leta 2016 (podatki za celo leto)).
Second bullet: The Federal Network Agency’s measurement tool (https://breitbandmessung.de/) allows since 25 September 2015 end-users of internet access services (fixed and mobile) to measure and compare actual and contracted speed. 
Druga alinea: Z orodjem za merjenje zvezne agencije za omrežja (https://breitbandmessung.de/) lahko končni uporabniki (fiksnih in mobilnih) storitev dostopa do interneta od 25. septembra 2015 izmerijo in primerjajo dejansko in naročeno hitrost.
Moreover, since the entry into force of the Transparency Ordinance further improvement can be expected, as a result of the additional information internet access providers are required to provide to the users. 
Poleg tega se lahko po začetku veljavnosti odloka o preglednosti pričakujejo nadaljnje izboljšave zaradi dodatnih podatkov, ki jih morajo ponudniki dostopa do interneta zagotoviti uporabnikom.
The Commission notes that the requirements for investing in black areas are set out in paragraphs 82-85 of the Broadband Guidelines, such as demonstration that the subsidized network has significant enhanced technological characteristics and performance compared to the existing networks; the subsidized network is operated as a wholesale only network and the aid does not lead to an excessive distortion of competition with other NGA technologies that have recently been the subject of significant new infrastructure investments by market operators. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da so zahteve za naložbe v črne lise določene v odstavkih od 82 do 85 smernic za širokopasovna omrežja, kot je ponazoritev, da ima subvencionirano omrežje pomembne izboljšane tehnološke značilnosti in zmogljivosti v primerjavi z obstoječimi omrežji; da se subvencionirano omrežje upravlja izključno kot grosistično omrežje ter da pomoč ne povzroča pretiranega izkrivljanja konkurence z drugimi tehnologijami dostopovnih omrežij naslednje generacije, za katere so komercialni vlagatelji nedavno izvedli precejšnje nove infrastrukturne naložbe.
In the Broadband Guidelines there are clear provisions stating that it is possible to grant aid in grey and black areas, subject to certain conditions (see paragraphs 67 and following, 76 and paragraphs 82-85 of the Guidelines). 
Smernice za širokopasovna omrežja vsebujejo jasne določbe, v skladu s katerimi se pod določenimi pogoji lahko dodeli pomoč v sivih in črnih lisah (glej odstavek 67 in naslednje odstavke, odstavek 76 in odstavke od 82 do 85 Smernic).