natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Concerning the efficiency of the processes, the Commission would like to point out that: IV. (a) The current IT tools and the current staff allocation have allowed for the negotiation and signing of thousands of grants and the analysis and payment of thousands of interim and final payments while at the same time harmonising and reducing time to grant. 
Komisija želi v zvezi z učinkovitostjo postopkov poudariti naslednje: IV. (a) Sedanja orodja IT in razporeditev osebja so omogočili pogajanja in podpise na tisoče sporazumov o dodelitvi sredstev ter analizo in izvedbo na tisoče vmesnih in končnih plačil, hkrati pa so pripomogli k usklajevanju in skrajšanju časa do dodelitve.
In 2012, for example, these processes have allowed for the signature of 4 324 grants with 19 963 beneficiaries. 
V letu 2012 so na primer ti postopki omogočili podpis 4 324 sporazumov o dodelitvi sredstev z 19 963 upravičenci.
Therefore, the current IT tools and the current allocation of staff resources are effective. 
Sedanja orodja IT in razporeditev kadrovskih virov so torej učinkoviti.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION The fact that time to grant has converged amongst the Commission services implementing FP7, and the fact that it has already been reduced to a level close to the deadline set in the new Financial Regulation and applicable to contracts resulting from future calls (270 days), is further evidence of the fact that the current IT tools and the current allocation of staff resources are effective. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Dejstvo, da se čas do dodelitve med službami Komisije, ki izvajajo 7. OP, usklajuje in je že bil skrajšan do te mere, da je blizu roka, določenega v novi finančni uredbi, pri čemer se uporablja za pogodbe, sklenjene na podlagi prihodnjih razpisov (270 dni), je še en dokaz, da so sedanja orodja IT in razporeditev kadrovskih virov učinkoviti.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the Cooperation Specific Programme comprises different kinds of actions (collaborative research in different fields with, for instance, different ethical and security review requirements; joint programming; JTIs) that do not allow for simple mechanical staff allocation comparisons. 
Poleg tega je treba omeniti, da posebni program „Sodelovanje“ zajema različne vrste dejavnosti (skupne raziskave na različnih področjih, za katera veljajo na primer različne zahteve po presoji etičnosti in varnosti, skupno načrtovanje programov in skupne tehnološke pobude), ki ne omogočajo enostavnih mehaničnih primerjav razporeditve zaposlenih.
The Commission nevertheless agrees that the optimal allocation of staff resources constitutes a permanent challenge for any administration and will, in view of the new framework programme Horizon 2020, pay due attention to this issue. 
Komisija se kljub temu strinja, da optimalna razporeditev kadrovskih virov pomeni nenehen izziv za vsako upravo, in bo temu vprašanju namenila ustrezno pozornost v okviru novega okvirnega programa Obzorje 2020.
IV. (b) Time to grant has converged amongst the Commission services implementing FP7 and has already been reduced to a level close to the deadline set in the new Financial Regulation and applicable to contracts resulting from future calls (270 days). 
IV. (b) Čas do dodelitve med službami Komisije, ki izvajajo 7.
For contracts signed in 2012, time to grant was 264 days in DG CNECT and 279 days in DG RTD. IV. (c) The control architecture of FP7 has been designed in such a manner that most reliance is put on ex post controls. 
Za pogodbe, ki so bile podpisane v letu 2012, je čas do dodelitve znašal 264 dni v Generalnem direktoratu za komunikacijska omrežja, vsebine in tehnologijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: GD za komunikacijska omrežja, vsebine in tehnologijo) ter 297 dni v Generalnem direktoratu za raziskave in inovacije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: GD za raziskave in inovacije). IV. (c) Struktura nadzora 7.
Ex ante controls have been consciously reduced in order to simplify the system and reduce the administrative burden for beneficiaries. 
Predhodne kontrole so bile zavestno zmanjšane, da bi se poenostavil sistem in zmanjšalo upravno breme za upravičence.
This ensures that appropriate attention can be given to balancing trust and control, to improvements in time to grant and time to pay and, ultimately, to the attractiveness of the policy. 
To zagotavlja, da se ustrezno pozornost lahko nameni uravnoteženju zaupanja in nadzora, izboljšanju časa do dodelitve in časa do plačila ter nazadnje tudi privlačnosti politike.
The Commission nevertheless agrees that ex ante controls should be focused on beneficiaries marked by higher risks. 
Komisija se kljub temu strinja, da bi se bilo treba v okviru predhodnih kontrol osredotočiti na upravičence, ki pomenijo večje tveganje.
As regards ex post controls, the Commission strategy for ex post controls already today foresees risk-based audits as well, as a separate pillar of the audit strategy. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Kar zadeva naknadne kontrole, so v strategiji Komisije že sedaj kot ločen steber revizijske strategije predvidene revizije, ki temeljijo na tveganju. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
64 V. The Commission agrees that the legal framework for JTIs needs to be simplified for the future. 
64 V. Komisija se strinja, da je treba pravni okvir za skupne tehnološke pobude v prihodnje poenostaviti.
The new Financial Regulation moves in this direction by introducing the possibility (Article 209) for the setting up of ‘special public–private partnership bodies’ (PPP) whose financial rules should be adopted in accordance with a ‘light’ model financial regulation for PPP bodies. 
Nova finančna uredba v tem smislu uvaja možnost (člen 209) ustanovitve „posebnih subjektov, pooblaščenih za izvajanje javno-zasebnega partnerstva (JZP)“, katerih finančna pravila bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s „poenostavljeno“ vzorčno finančno uredbo za organe, pooblaščene za izvajanje JZP.
The interim evaluation report on the RSFF has confirmed the added value of the RSFF. 
V poročilu o vmesni oceni Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja je bila potrjena njegova dodana vrednost.
It also deserves emphasis that the additionality of public funding is a complex and multidimensional concept that goes beyond pure project additionality (whether the project would have been carried out in the absence of public funding) and also encompasses scale, scope, acceleration, partner, output, etc. VI. 
Poudariti je treba tudi, da je dodatnost javnega financiranja zapleten in večdimenzionalen koncept, ki presega zgolj dodatnost projekta (če bi bil projekt izveden brez javnega financiranja) ter zajema tudi obseg, področje uporabe, pospeševanje, partnerja, rezultat itd. VI.
The Commission's view on the Court recommendations is: REPLY OF THE COMMISSION The Commission agrees that the optimal allocation of staff resources constitutes a permanent challenge for any administration and will, in view of the new framework programme Horizon 2020, pay due attention to this issue. VI. (c) Time to-grant has converged amongst the Commission services implementing FP7 and has already been reduced to a level close to the deadline set in the new Financial Regulation (see above IV, b) and applicable to contracts resulting from future calls (270 days). 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Komisija se strinja, da optimalna razporeditev kadrovskih virov pomeni nenehen izziv za vsako upravo, in bo temu vprašanju namenila ustrezno pozornost v okviru novega okvirnega programa Obzorje 2020. VI. (c) Čas do dodelitve med službami Komisije, ki izvajajo 7. OP, se usklajuje in je že bil skrajšan do te mere, da je blizu roka, določenega v novi finančni uredbi (glej zgornji oddelek IV, odstavek (b)), pri čemer se uporablja za pogodbe, sklenjene na podlagi prihodnjih razpisov (270 dni).
VI. (d) The Commission is already carrying out risk-based controls, but agrees that this needs further development. 
VI. (d) Komisija že izvaja kontrole, ki temeljijo na tveganju, vendar se strinja, da je na tem področju potreben nadaljnji razvoj.
VI. (e) The Commission agrees that the legal framework of the joint technology initiatives should be simplified. 
VI. (e) Komisija se strinja, da bi bilo treba poenostaviti pravni okvir skupnih tehnoloških pobud.
The new Financial Regulation moves in this direction by introducing the possibility (Article 209) for the setting up of ‘special PPP bodies’ whose financial rules should be adopted in accordance with a ‘light’ model financial regulation for PPP bodies. 
Nova finančna uredba v tem smislu uvaja možnost (člen 209) ustanovitve „posebnih subjektov, pooblaščenih za izvajanje JZP“, katerih finančna pravila bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s „poenostavljeno“ vzorčno finančno uredbo za organe, pooblaščene za izvajanje JZP.
However, the significant budget allocated to and managed by these organisations is just as important as the staff complement when considering the control framework. 
Vendar pa je znaten proračun, ki je namenjen tem organizacijam in s katerim slednje tudi upravljajo, pri obravnavanju nadzornega okvira prav tako pomemben kot število zaposlenih.
For the RSFF, the Commission considers on the basis of the evidence available that it already satisfactorily targets those beneficiaries which have limited access to finance. 
Glede Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja Komisija na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazov meni, da so v tem okviru že zadovoljivo obravnavani tisti upravičenci, ki imajo omejen dostop do finančnih sredstev.
However, it will continue to monitor this aspect. 
Vendar pa bo ta vidik še naprej spremljala.
Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 65 OBSERVATIONS 20. 
2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave? 65 OPAŽANJA 20.
The FP7 funding model foresees the voluntary use of flat rates in particular for indirect costs. 
OP je zlasti za posredne stroške predvidena prostovoljna uporaba pavšalnih zneskov.
However, many beneficiaries have voluntarily chosen not to pursue this option. 
Vendar pa so se številni upravičenci prostovoljno odločili, da te možnosti ne bodo uporabili.
In the light of its experience with FP7, the Commission shares the analysis of the Court of Auditors and proposes far-reaching simplification under Horizon 2020, especially a single reimbursement rate per project and a mandatory single flat rate for the calculation of indirect costs. 
Komisija se na podlagi svojih izkušenj s 7. OP strinja z analizo Računskega sodišča in predlaga obsežnejšo poenostavitev v okviru programa Obzorje 2020, in sicer zlasti enotno stopnjo povračila za projekte in obvezen enotni pavšalni znesek za izračun posrednih stroškov.
This has been endorsed by the Court, in its opinion 6/2012 on the Commission proposal laying down the rules for the participation and dissemination in 'Horizon 2020 — The framework programme for research and innovation (2014–20)'. 
To je Sodišče tudi potrdilo v svojem Mnenju št. 6/2012 o predlogu Komisije o pravilih za udeležbo v „okvirnem programu za raziskave in inovacije Obzorje 2020 ter razširjanje njegovih rezultatov (2014–2020)“.
Furthermore, the Commission framework programmes face inherent complexities that are rarely if ever encountered in national funding programmes such as thousands of grants involving different types of participants from a variety of countries. 
Poleg tega so pri okvirnih programih Komisije pogoste notranje zapletenosti, ki se redko, če sploh kdaj, pojavljajo v nacionalnih programih financiranja, kot je na tisoče nepovratnih sredstev, ki vključujejo različne vrste udeležencev iz različnih držav.
The Commission has made FP7 rules as far as possible compatible with general business practices. 
Komisija je oblikovala pravila 7. OP tako, da so čim bolj združljiva s splošnimi poslovnimi praksami.
However the Commission has to ensure that all of the eligibility criteria included in the rules for participation are met. 
Vendar mora Komisija zagotoviti, da so izpolnjena vsa merila za upravičenost, ki so vključena v pravila za udeležbo.
As the Court and the Commission have found in their audits, there are costs incurred by the beneficiary that are not eligible although they are based on the accounting and management principles and practices of the participant. 
Kot sta ugotovila Sodišče in Komisija v svojih revizijah, obstajajo stroški upravičencev, ki niso upravičeni, čeprav temeljijo na računovodskih in upravnih načelih ter praksi udeležencev.
As an example, in FP7, VAT is not eligible. 
OP na primer ni upravičen DDV.
Most public sector beneficiaries' accounting and management principles and practices, however, include VAT (as they cannot recover it). 
Vendar pa večina računovodskih in upravnih načel ter praks upravičencev v javnem sektorju vključuje DDV (saj ga ne morejo dobiti povrnjenega).
The normal practices are therefore not in line with the FP7 eligibility criteria. 
Zato običajne prakse niso v skladu z merili za upravičenost 7.
Other examples of ineligible costs contained in usual accounting and management principles and practices of the participant are promotion and marketing costs, debt financing costs, etc. 
Drugi primeri neupravičenih stroškov v običajnih računovodskih in upravnih načelih ter praksah upravičencev so stroški predstavitvenih dejavnostih in trženja, stroški dolžniškega financiranja itd. ODGOVOR KOMISIJE 22.
The Commission has made efforts to accept beneficiaries' practices wherever this could be done in line with the other eligibility criteria set out in the legal framework, for example in the case of average personnel costs. 
Komisija si je prizadevala sprejeti prakse upravičencev, kadar je to v skladu z drugimi merili za upravičenost, ki so določena v pravnem okviru, lahko storila, na primer v primeru povprečnih stroškov za zaposlene.
However, as shown above, beneficiaries' practices are often not in line with the other eligibility criteria set out in the rules for participation. 
Vendar, kot je navedeno zgoraj, prakse upravičencev pogosto niso v skladu z drugimi merili za upravičenost, ki so določena v pravilih za udeležbo.
This is why they cannot be accepted. 
Zato jih ni mogoče sprejeti.
The certification mechanism shows that the Commission was committed to taking account of FP7 beneficiaries’ accounting practices where possible. 
Mehanizem potrjevanja kaže na to, da se je Komisija zavezala k upoštevanju računovodskih praks upravičencev 7.
Beneficiaries interested in this option were asked to take account in their methodologies not only of their own accounting practices, but also of the eligibility criteria set out in the rules for participation. 
Upravičenci, zainteresirani za to možnost, so bili pozvani, naj v svojih metodologijah ne upoštevajo samo lastnih računovodskih praks, ampak tudi merila za upravičenost, ki so določena v pravilih za udeležbo.
The Commission approved beneficiaries' methodologies when both aspects were met. 
Komisija je odobrila metodologije upravičencev, ko sta bila izpolnjena oba vidika.
The Commission has also introduced substantial simplification to facilitate the use of average personnel costs within the overall existing legal framework. 
Komisija je uvedla tudi znatne poenostavitve, da bi olajšala uporabo povprečnih stroškov za zaposlene v okviru veljavnega splošnega pravnega okvira.
Overall, however, the disappointing experience with ex ante certification of cost methodologies will be taken into account in the preparation of the rules for the next funding period. 
Na splošno pa se bodo slabe izkušnje s predhodnim potrjevanjem metodologij obračunavanja stroškov upoštevale pri pripravi pravil za naslednje obdobje financiranja.
The Commission responded very quickly to the European Parliament resolution. 
Komisija se je zelo hitro odzvala na resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta.
Already on 23 June 2009, the Commission adopted interim criteria for the acceptance of average personnel costs C(2009) 4705. 
Že 23. junija 2009 je sprejela začasna merila sprejemljivosti povprečnih stroškov za zaposlene (C(2009) 4705).
Once these interim criteria were adopted, a prudent approach — consisting of a pilot phase before any further decisive steps — was necessary due to the risk of significant deviations of average costs from actual costs. 
Ko so bila začasna merila sprejeta, je bil zaradi tveganja znatnih odstopanj povprečnih stroškov od dejanskih stroškov potreben preudaren pristop, ki zajema pilotno fazo pred kakršnimi koli odločilnimi koraki.
For the Commission, it was necessary then to allow for a certain period of implementation of the 2009 decision in order to gather factual data on its impact, especially feedback from stakeholders. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Komisija je nato morala omogočiti določeno obdobje za izvajanje sklepa iz leta 2009, da bi zbrala dejanske podatke o njegovem učinku, in sicer zlasti povratne informacije od zainteresiranih strani. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
66 On this basis, once further elements were compiled, the Commission initiated the modification of the criteria taking on board to the largest extent possible the experiences gathered through the pilot phase. 
66 Na podlagi tega je Komisija potem, ko so bili zbrani dodatni elementi, začela s spreminjanjem meril, pri čemer je v največjem možnem obsegu upoštevala izkušnje, ki jih je pridobila v pilotni fazi.
As a consequence of the above, the criteria for accepting average personnel costs were simplified in 2011 (Commission decision of 24 January 2011, C(2011) 174 final). 
Posledično so bila merila za sprejetje povprečnih stroškov za zaposlene v letu 2011 poenostavljena (Sklep Komisije z dne 24. januarja 2011, C(2011) 174 final).
Against this background, the reference to 21 months and the implication of slow decision-making is misleading. 
Ob upoštevanju navedenega so sklicevanje na 21 mesecev in posledice počasnega odločanja zavajajoči.
In addition, the new approach resulting from the 2011 Commission Decision is applicable retroactively to all FP7 projects. 
Poleg tega se novi pristop, ki temelji na sklepu Komisije iz leta 2011, uporablja retroaktivno za vse projekte v 7.
The eligibility criteria are set out clearly in the rules for participation adopted by the legislative authority, and it is the Commission's task to ensure that these are fully respected. 
Merila za upravičenost so jasno določena v pravilih za udeležbo, ki jih je sprejel zakonodajni organ, in naloga Komisije je zagotoviti, da se ta v celoti spoštujejo.
The RES's answers are subject to a disclaimer because they are based entirely on information supplied by the beneficiary, which may be partial or incomplete. 
Za odgovore Raziskovalno-informacijske službe velja izjava o odklonitvi pravne odgovornosti, saj ti v celoti temeljijo na informacijah, ki jih predložijo upravičenci in ki so lahko delne ali nepopolne.
Consequently, the service may not have all the elements required for a complete understanding of the case. 
Posledično službe morda nimajo vseh elementov, ki so potrebni za popolno razumevanje primera.
There are, therefore, valid reasons for having a legal disclaimer. 
Zato obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za izjavo o odklonitvi pravne odgovornosti.
According to Article 31 of the rules for participation, in order to be considered eligible, costs incurred in the implementation of an indirect action ‘must be actual’. 
Stroški, nastali pri izvajanju posrednega ukrepa, „morajo biti dejanski“, da se v skladu s členom 31 pravil za udeležbo štejejo za upravičene.
Consequently, for FP7, beneficiaries are required to substantiate the costs incurred. 
Posledično morajo upravičenci v okviru 7. OP utemeljiti nastale stroške.
In the Guide to Financial Issues, the Commission recommends — as a response to the questions posed by the beneficiaries on this topic — the use of timesheets as adequate evidence to support the personnel costs incurred. 
V navodilih za finančna vprašanja Komisija kot odgovor na vprašanja, ki jih imajo upravičenci na to temo priporoča uporabo časovnic kot ustreznega dokaza za utemeljitev stroškov za osebje.
The guide states that: ‘Working time to be charged must be recorded throughout the duration of the project by timesheets, adequately supported by evidence of their reality and reliability.’ However, theguide goes on to state that: ‘In the absence of timesheets, the beneficiary must substantiate the cost claimed by reasonable means (alternative evidence) giving an equivalent level of assurance, to be assessed by the auditor.’ 
V navodilih je navedeno naslednje: „Delovni čas, ki se zaračuna, je treba v času trajanja projekta beležiti s časov-nicami, ustrezno podprtimi z dokazi o njihovi resničnosti in zanesljivosti.“ Vendar je v navodilih poleg tega navedeno tudi naslednje: „V odsotnosti časovnic mora upravičenec utemeljiti priglašene stroške z ustreznimi sredstvi (nado-mestnimi dokazi), ki zagotavljajo enako mero jamstva in ki jih mora oceniti revizor.“ ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Zato Komisija pri oceni upravičenosti stroškov sprejema prakso upravičencev, če je ta v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi merili.
Examples of acceptable practices are: time allocation on the basis of timesheets and thus actual hours, cost allocated on the basis of percentages and, where a researcher is dedicated exclusively to one project, the whole cost of employment of that researcher, provided that the costs claimed are adequately substantiated in terms of their reality and reliability. 
Primeri sprejemljivih praks so: razporeditev časa na podlagi časovnic in s tem dejanskih ur, porazdelitev stroškov na podlagi odstotkov in, kadar je raziskovalec izključno dodeljen enemu projektu, celotni stroški zaposlovanja tega raziskovalca pod pogojem, da so priglašeni stroški ustrezno utemeljeni v smislu njihove resničnosti in zanesljivosti.
Box 2 Both of these approaches are acceptable under FP7 as long as there is adequate evidence to support the reality of the time charged to the project. 
Okvir 2 V okviru 7. OP sta sprejemljiva oba pristopa, če obstajajo ustrezni dokazi za utemeljitev dejansko porabljenega časa, ki se zaračuna za projekt.
The Commission considers that the Research Enquiry Service is a single clearing house. 
Komisija meni, da je Raziskovalno-informacijska služba en sam center za izmenjavo informacij.
Common reply to paragraphs 35–39 Since the very beginning of FP7, the Commission has been committed to ensuring good coordination between the different Commission services implementing the programme. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke 35–39 Komisija si je že od samega začetka 7. OP prizadevala zagotoviti dobro usklajenost med svojimi službami, ki izvajajo program.
For this purpose, the Commission has set up, in a proactive manner, a range of mechanisms for identifying and resolving instances of incoherent treatment by different Commission services. 
Zato je proaktivno vzpostavila vrsto mehanizmov za odkrivanje in reševanje primerov nedoslednega obravnavanja s strani različnih služb Komisije.
These mechanisms include the Research Enquiry Service, interservice groups, and the Research Clearing Committee. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Med te mehanizme spadajo Raziskovalno-informacijska služba, medresorske skupine in Odbor za raziskovalna vprašanja. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
67 The Commission has clear indications that the lack of coherence is of limited importance. 
67 Komisija ima jasne dokaze, ki kažejo, da je pomanjkanje doslednosti omejenega pomena.