natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-4055-2 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-4048-4 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-4022-4 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/72393 doi:10.2865/06260 doi:10.2865/38409 QJ-AB-16-001-EN-C QJ-AB-16-001-EN-N QJ-AB-16-001-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-4041-5 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-4046-0 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-4008-8 ISSN 1831-094X ISSN 1977-5784 ISSN 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/40554 doi:10.2865/27634 doi:10.2865/937677 QJ-AB-16-001-SL-C QJ-AB-16-001-SL-N QJ-AB-16-001-SL-E © Evropska unija, 2016 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
12 is reproduced with the kind permission of the OECD. ©OECD (2003), Farm Household Income: Issues and Policy Responses, OECD Publishing, Paris. 
12 z dovoljenjem OECD. ©OECD (2003), Farm Household Income: Issues and Policy Responses (dohodki gospodinjstev kmetij: vprašanja in odzivi politike), OECD Publishing, Pariz.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264099678-en 
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264099678-en.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 01 Is the Commission’s system for performance measurement in relation to farmers’ incomes well designed and based on sound data? (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
št. 01 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Ali je sistem Komisije za merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja v zvezi z dohodki kmetov dobro zasnovan in temelji na zanesljivih podatkih? (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
The audit was led by ECA Member Rasa Budbergytė, supported by the head of her private office, Tomas Mackevičius, and Maura McElhinney, attaché; Hèlder Faria Viegas, principal manager; Sven Kölling and Blanka Happach, core team; Ramona Bortnowschi, Els Brems, Antonio Caruda Ruiz, Vincent Ly-Sunnaram, Ioannis Papadakis, Maciej Szymura and Bertrand Tanguy, auditors. 
Revizijo je vodila članica Evropskega računskega sodišča Rasa Budbergytė, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njenega kabineta Tomas Mackevičius, atašejka Maura McEl-hinney, vodilni upravni uslužbenec Hèlder Faria Viegas, člana ožje ekipe Sven Kölling in Blanka Happach ter revizorji Ramona Bortnowschi, Els Brems, Antonio Caruda Ruiz, Vincent Ly-Sunnaram, Ioannis Papadakis, Maciej Szymura in Bertrand Tanguy.
From left to right: B. Happach, T. Mackevičius, S. Kölling, R. Budbergytė, H. Faria Viegas. 
Od leve proti desni: B. Happach, T. Mackevičius, S. Kölling, R. Budbergytė, H. Faria Viegas.
Contents 03 Paragraph Abbreviations Glossary I-X Executive summary 1-17 Introduction 1-2 General objectives of the CAP and of the 2013 reform in relation to farmers’ incomes 3-5 The objectives of measures financed by the EAGF in relation to farmers’ incomes 6 Farmers’ incomes, the income of farm households and standard of living 7-11 The Commission’s data sources for incomes in agriculture 12-15 Performance measurement of CAP measures in relation to agricultural income 16-17 Previous Court audits 18-24 Audit scope and approach 25-87 Observations 25-51 The Commission has not yet established a comprehensive set of data for assessing the performance of CAP measures in relation to farmers’ incomes 26-32 The Commission still lacks relevant information on farmers’ incomes at EU level 33-39 The EAAs are an important tool for monitoring the economic situation of agriculture but they have inherent limitations for assessing CAP measures 40-51 The FADN is a well-established source of income and business information on commercial agricultural holdings but it has limitations 
Kazalo 03 Odstavek Kratice Glosar I-X Povzetek 1-17 Uvod 1-2 Splošni cilji SKP in reforme iz leta 2013 v zvezi z dohodki kmetov 3-5 Cilji ukrepov, financiranih iz EKJS, v zvezi z dohodki kmetov 6 Dohodki kmetov, dohodki gospodinjstev kmetij in življenjska raven 7-11 Viri podatkov o dohodkih v kmetijstvu, ki jih uporablja Komisija 12-15 Merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v zvezi s kmetijskimi dohodki 16-17 Prejšnje revizije, ki jih je opravilo Sodišče 18-24 Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 25-87 Opažanja 25-51 Komisija še ni določila celovitega sklopa podatkov za oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v zvezi z dohodki kmetov 26-32 Komisija še vedno nima ustreznih informacij o dohodkih kmetov na ravni EU 33-39 Ekonomski računi za kmetijstvo so pomembno orodje za spremljanje gospodarskih razmer v kmetijstvu, vendar imajo omejitve za ocenjevanje ukrepov SKP 40-51 Mreža FADN je dobro uveljavljen vir dohodkovnih in poslovnih informacij o komercialnih kmetijskih gospodarstvih, vendar ima omejitve
Contents 04 52-76 The Commission and Member States did not always ensure that available data on farmers’ incomes were of an appropriate quality 54-58 There were weaknesses in the Commission’s management of the EAAs ... 
Kazalo 04 52-76 Komisija in države članice niso vedno zagotovile ustrezne kakovosti razpoložljivih podatkov o dohodkih kmetov 54-58 V načinu, kako Komisija upravlja ERK, obstajajo slabosti ...
59-76 ... and in some Member States there were weaknesses in the operation of the FADN 77-87 Limitations in available data, vague objectives of certain CAP measures and weaknesses in performance indicators impact the Commission’s ability to demonstrate what has been achieved 79-82 Direct payments serve a multitude of objectives whose achievement is difficult to measure ... 
59-76 ... v nekaterih državah članicah pa obstajajo slabosti pri delovanju FADN 77-87 Omejitve pri razpoložljivih podatkih, ohlapni cilji nekaterih ukrepov SKP in slabosti pri kazalnikih smotrnosti poslovanja vplivajo na zmožnost Komisije, da prikaže, kaj je bilo doseženo 79-82 Neposredna plačila služijo številnim ciljem, katerih doseganje je težko izmeriti ...
83-87 ... and CAP performance indicators related to farmers’ incomes cannot be clearly linked to measures and actual achievement of the objectives 88-100 Conclusions and recommendations Annex I — Annex II — Annex III — Annex IV — Annex V — Member State choices for the implementation of EU direct payments Calculation of agricultural income as defined under the EAAs Calculation of income in the framework of the FADN Commission performance indicators for assessing the CAP Quality criteria applying to European statistics Reply of the Commission 
83-87 ... kazalnikov smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju SKP, ki se nanašajo na dohodke kmetov, pa ni mogoče jasno povezati z ukrepi in dejanskim doseganjem ciljev 88-100 Zaključki in priporočila Priloga I Priloga II Priloga III Priloga IV Priloga V — Odločitve držav članic pri izvajanju neposrednih plačil EU — Izračun kmetijskega dohodka, kot je opredeljen v ERK — Izračun dohodka v okviru mreže FADN — Kazalniki smotrnosti poslovanja za oceno SKP, ki jih uporablja Komisija — Merila kakovosti, ki se uporabljajo za evropsko statistiko Odgovori Komisije
Abbreviations 05 CAP: common agricultural policy CMEF: common monitoring and evaluation framework EAA: economic accounts for agriculture EAGF: European Agricultural Guarantee Fund EAFRD: European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development EU-SILC: European Union statistics on income and living conditions FADN: farm accountancy data network FSS: farm structure survey OECD: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development TFEU: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 
Kratice 05 CMEF: skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja EKJS: Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad EKSRP: Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja ERK: ekonomski računi za kmetijstvo EU-SILC: statistika Evropske unije o dohodku in življenjskih pogojih FADN: mreža za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov s kmetijskih gospodarstev FSS: raziskovanje strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev OECD: Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj SKP: skupna kmetijska politika TFEU: Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije
Agricultural factor income: income received from the factors employed in agricultural production (land, labour and capital). 
Faktorski dohodek kmetijstva: dohodek od faktorjev, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijsko proizvodnjo (zemljišča, delo in kapital).
It is calculated by subtracting the value of intermediate consumption, the consumption of fixed capital (depreciation) and production taxes from the value of agricultural output at basic prices and adding the value of (other) subsidies on production. 
Izračuna se tako, da se od vrednosti kmetijske proizvodnje po osnovnih cenah odštejejo vrednost vmesne potrošnje, porabe fiksnega kapitala (amortizacija) in davkov na proizvodnjo, prišteje pa se vrednost (drugih) subvencij na proizvodnjo.
It does not as a general rule include income from other sources (non-agricultural activities, salaries, social benefits, income from property). 
Praviloma ne vključuje dohodkov iz drugih virov (nekmetijske dejavnosti, plače, socialni prejemki, dohodek od lastnine).
Agricultural holding: unit with a single management, which carries out agricultural activities within the territory of the EU, either as its primary or secondary activity. 
Kmetijsko gospodarstvo: enota, ki ima eno vodstvo in opravlja kmetijske dejavnosti na ozemlju EU bodisi kot glavno bodisi kot stransko dejavnost.
A farmer can have several agricultural holdings. 
Kmet ima lahko več kmetijskih gospodarstev.
Decoupling: process of separation of direct aid payments from agricultural production. 
Ločevanje: proces ločevanja plačil neposredne pomoči od kmetijske proizvodnje.
Farm net value added: indicator of the FADN, which describes the total production value of an agricultural holding plus direct payments minus intermediate consumption and depreciation. 
Neto dodana vrednost kmetije: kazalnik FADN, ki opisuje skupno vrednost proizvodnje kmetijskega gospodarstva skupaj z neposrednimi plačili ter brez vmesne potrošnje in amortizacije.
This is the amount available to pay for all fixed production factors of an agricultural holding (land, labour and capital). 
To je znesek, ki je na voljo za plačilo vseh fiksnih proizvodnih faktorjev kmetijskega gospodarstva (zemljišča, delo in kapital).
Farm net income: indicator of the FADN, which describes the amount available to remunerate the holding’s own production factors. 
Neto dohodek kmetije: kazalnik FADN, ki opisuje znesek, ki je na voljo za poplačilo lastnih proizvodnih faktorjev gospodarstva.
It is calculated by deducting wages, rent and interest paid by the holder from farm net value added. 
Izračuna se z odštetjem plač, najemnin in obresti, ki jih plača imetnik, od neto dodane vrednosti kmetije.
2003 reform: the CAP reform, which introduced the decoupling of direct aid from agricultural production and made payments conditional upon compliance with basic standards concerning the maintenance of land, the environment, food safety, animal and plant health and animal welfare (known as cross-compliance). 
Reforma iz leta 2003: reforma SKP, s katero sta bila uvedena ločevanje neposredne pomoči na kmetijsko proizvodnjo in pogojenost plačil z izpolnjevanjem osnovnih standardov v zvezi z vzdrževanjem zemljišč, okoljem, varnostjo hrane, zdravjem rastlin in živali ter dobrim počutjem živali (navzkrižna skladnost).
2013 reform: the CAP reform for the 2014-2020 period. 
Reforma iz leta 2013: reforma SKP za obdobje 2014–2020.
It aims to achieve a more balanced distribution of the available support and to reward farmers for sustainable farming practices via a specific ‘greening payment’. 
Njen cilj je doseči bolj uravnoteženo porazdelitev razpoložljive podpore in kmete nagraditi za trajnostne kmetijske prakse s posebnim „zelenim plačilom”.
It also intends to improve the market orientation of EU agriculture, while providing a safety net to defend farmers against external uncertainties, and to further support rural development in the Member States. 
Poleg tega naj bi izboljšala tržno usmerjenost kmetijstva EU, obenem pa zagotavljala varnostno mrežo za zaščito kmetov pred zunanjimi negotovostmi in dodatno podpirala razvoj podeželja v državah članicah.
Executive 08 summary IThe incomes and standard of living of farmers are a particular focus of the treaty and the 2013 reform of the common agricultural policy (CAP). 
Povzetek 08 IDohodki in življenjska raven kmetov so posebej poudarjeni v Pogodbi in reformi skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) iz leta 2013.
Almost one third of the EU budget is still directly or indirectly dedicated to supporting farmers’ incomes and thus contributing to ensuring a fair standard of living for farmers. 
Skoraj tretjina proračuna EU se še vedno neposredno ali posredno namenja podpori dohodkom kmetov, kar prispeva k zagotavljanju primerne življenjske ravni kmetov.
II The new framework for the monitoring and evaluation of the CAP requires the Commission to assess the combined impact of CAP measures in relation to the stated objectives. 
II Novi okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja SKP zahteva, da Komisija oceni skupni učinek ukrepov SKP glede na zastavljene cilje.
This requires not only clearly defined objectives, targets and indicators but also sufficient and good-quality statistical information on the economic situation of agriculture and on farmers’ incomes. 
To zahteva jasno opredeljene cilje, podcilje in kazalnike, pa tudi zadostne in kakovostne statistične informacije o gospodarskih razmerah v kmetijstvu in o dohodkih kmetov.
III This report assesses whether the Commission’s performance measurement in relation to farmers’ incomes is well designed and based on sound data. 
III V tem poročilu je bilo ocenjeno, ali je merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja v zvezi z dohodki kmetov, ki ga uporablja Komisija, dobro zasnovano in ali temelji na zanesljivih podatkih.
The Court examined whether the Commission clearly established the statistical data needed, whether these data were of appropriate quality and whether the Commission defined relevant indicators. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali je Komisija jasno določila potrebne statistične podatke, ali so bili ti ustrezne kakovosti in ali je Komisija opredelila ustrezne kazalnike.
IV The Court concludes that the Commission’s system for measuring the performance of the CAP in relation to farmers’ incomes is not sufficiently well designed and the quantity and quality of statistical data used to analyse farmers’ incomes has significant limitations. 
IV Sodišče je prišlo do zaključka, da sistem Komisije za merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju SKP v zvezi z dohodki kmetov ni dovolj dobro zasnovan, količina in kakovost statističnih podatkov, ki se uporabljajo za analizo dohodkov kmetov, pa imata pomembne omejitve.
VThe Commission has not clearly established the statistical data needed to effectively assess the performance of CAP measures in support of farmers’ incomes. 
VKomisija ni jasno določila statističnih podatkov, potrebnih za uspešno oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP v podporo dohodkom kmetov.
No representative data are available on the disposable income of farm households, which would facilitate assessing the achievement of the treaty objective of ensuring a fair standard of living for farmers. 
Na voljo ni nobenih reprezentativnih podatkov o razpoložljivih dohodkih gospodinjstev kmetij, ki bi omogočili oceno doseganja cilja zagotavljanja primerne življenjske ravni kmetov, določenega v Pogodbi.
Furthermore, there is no reliable system to allow comparisons to be made between agricultural incomes and those in other sectors of the economy, which could justify EU income support for farmers. 
Prav tako ni zanesljivega sistema, ki bi omogočal primerjavo med kmetijski dohodki in tistimi v drugih gospodarskih sektorjih, kar bi upravičilo dohodkovno podporo EU za kmete.
VI The main tools currently available at EU level for measuring farmers’ incomes are the economic accounts for agriculture (EAAs) and the farm accountancy data network (FADN). 
VI Orodji, ki sta na ravni EU trenutno na voljo za merjenje dohodkov kmetov, sta ekonomski računi za kmetijstvo (ERK) in mreža za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov s kmetijskih gospodarstev (FADN).
The EAAs are the Commission’s main statistical source for monitoring farmers’ incomes globally at macroeconomic level. 
ERK so glavni statistični vir Komisije za spremljanje skupnih dohodkov kmetov na makroekonomski ravni.
However, their potential has not yet been fully used and they are not sufficiently informative about important factors that are relevant for farmers’ incomes, as well as for the economic value of agriculture as a whole. 
Vendar pa njihov potencial še ni povsem izkoriščen, poleg tega pa ne zagotavljajo dovolj informacij o pomembnih dejavnikih, relevantnih za dohodke kmetov in gospodarsko vrednost kmetijstva kot celote.
The FADN is an important instrument for the evaluation of the CAP but it has limitations, because it covers only commercial holdings and income information is incomplete. 
Mreža FADN je pomemben instrument za vrednotenje SKP, vendar ima omejitve, saj pokriva le komercialna gospodarstva, informacije o dohodkih pa so nepopolne.
Executive summary 09 VII The Commission and Member States did not always ensure that the data used for the measurement of farmers’ incomes were of appropriate quality. 
Povzetek 09 VII Komisija in države članice niso vedno zagotovile, da so podatki, ki se uporabljajo za merjenje dohodkov kmetov, ustrezne kakovosti.
For both the EAAs and the FADN, the Court found weaknesses in the management by the Commission and the Member States. 
Sodišče je pri ERK in FADN odkrilo slabosti pri upravljanju, ki ga izvajata Komisija in države članice.
In addition, quality assurance procedures for the EAAs are not yet fully effective, while the audit identified certain weaknesses in the quality assurance arrangements for the FADN. 
Poleg tega postopki zagotavljanja kakovosti za ERK še niso povsem uspešni, medtem ko so bile v mreži FADN pri reviziji ugotovljene nekatere slabosti pri ureditvah za zagotavljanje kakovosti.
VIII Vague objectives of certain CAP measures and the absence of a baseline make it difficult to assess whether individual CAP measures aimed at the support of farmers’ incomes have achieved their objectives. 
VIII Zaradi ohlapnih ciljev nekaterih ukrepov SKP in odsotnosti izhodišča je težko oceniti, ali so posamezni ukrepi SKP, namenjeni podpori dohodkom kmetov, dosegli svoje cilje.
The indicators on which the Commission has to build its assessment are not sufficiently reliable or are not linked clearly enough to CAP measures and, as such, are not useful to show whether they contributed effectively and efficiently towards the desired effects and reduced income disparities. 
Kazalniki, na katerih mora temeljiti ocena Komisije, niso dovolj zanesljivi ali niso dovolj jasno povezani z ukrepi SKP, kot taki pa ne morejo odražati, ali so uspešno in učinkovito prispevali k želenim učinkom in zmanjšali razlike v dohodkih.
IX In respect of statistical data on farmers’ incomes, the Court recommends that the Commission: (a) develop a more comprehensive framework for providing information on disposable income and for comparing farmers’ incomes with incomes in other sectors of the economy; (b) further develop the EAAs so that their potential can be better used; (c) ensure that the analysis of farmers’ incomes is based on indicators taking account of the current situation of agriculture and on sufficient and consistent data for all beneficiaries of CAP measures — this could be done by developing synergies between existing administrative data or by developing the FADN or other suitable statistical tools; (d) enhance the present quality assurance arrangements for the EAAs and the FADN statistics established by the Member States. 
IX V zvezi s statističnimi podatki o dohodkih kmetov Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija: (a) razvije celovitejši okvir za zagotavljanje informacij o razpoložljivem dohodku in za primerjavo dohodkov kmetov z dohodki v drugih gospodarskih sektorjih; (b) še naprej razvija ERK, tako da se lahko bolje izkoristi njihov potencial; (c) zagotovi, da analiza dohodkov kmetov temelji na kazalnikih, ki upoštevajo trenutne razmere v kmetijstvu, ter na zadostnih in doslednih podatkih za vse upravičence do ukrepov SKP. To bi se lahko doseglo z razvojem sinergij med obstoječimi upravnimi podatki ali z razvojem mreže FADN ali drugih ustreznih statističnih orodij; (d) okrepi sedanje ureditve zagotavljanja kakovosti za statistične podatke ERK in FADN, ki jih pripravijo države članice.
XWith regard to the measurement of the performance of CAP measures aimed at supporting farmers’ incomes, the Court recommends that, for the next programming period, the Commission define from the outset appropriate operational objectives and baselines against which the performance of the CAP measures can be compared, complement in the context of its evaluations the current framework of performance indicators with other relevant and good-quality data to measure the results achieved and assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the measures designed to support farmers’ incomes. 
XZa merjenje smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP, namenjenih podpori dohodkom kmetov, Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija za naslednje programsko obdobje že na začetku opredeli ustrezne operativne cilje in izhodišča, na podlagi katerih se bo lahko primerjala smotrnost poslovanja pri ukrepih SKP, v okviru svojih ocen dopolni sedanji okvir za kazalnike smotrnosti poslovanja z drugimi ustreznimi in kakovostnimi podatki za merjenje doseženih rezultatov ter oceni uspešnost in učinkovitost ukrepov, namenjenih podpori dohodkom kmetov.
Introduction 10 General objectives of the CAP and of the 2013 reform 01 According to the treaty1, the objectives of the CAP include increasing agricultural productivity ‘thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture’. 
Uvod 10 Splošni cilji SKP in reforme iz leta 2013 v zvezi 1Skladno s Pogodbo1 med cilje SKP spadajo „povečati kmetijsko produktivnost” in „s tem zagotoviti primerno življenjsko raven kmetijske skupnosti, zlasti s povečanjem individualnega zaslužka oseb, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom”.
The 2013 CAP reform2 also focused on agricultural income, in the context of the objective of viable food production, thus contributing to ensuring a fair standard of living for farmers3. 
Reforma SKP iz leta 20132 je bila prav tako osredotočena na kmetijske dohodke, in sicer v okviru cilja trajnostne proizvodnje hrane, ki naj bi prispeval k zagotavljanju primerne življenjske ravni kmetov3.
02 CAP measures are financed by the EU budget through the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF or ‘Pillar 1’) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD or ‘Pillar 2’). 
2Ukrepi SKP se financirajo iz proračuna EU prek Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS ali 1. steber) in Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP ali 2. steber).
Under the current multiannual financial framework, between 2014 and 2020 up to 277 billion euro (29 % of the total EU budget) will be spent from the EAGF for direct payments to farmers and for market support in specific agricultural sectors4. 
V okviru sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira bo med letoma 2014 in 2020 poraba iz EKJS za neposredna plačila kmetom in tržno podporo v določenih kmetijskih sektorjih znašala 277 milijard EUR (29 % celotnega proračuna EU)4.
The objectives of measures financed by the EAGF in relation to farmers’ incomes 03 The 2003 CAP reform shifted the emphasis from production support (so-called decoupling) and introduced a system of income support that was largely based on the aid levels received by individual farmers during a reference period. 
Cilji ukrepov, financiranih iz EKJS, v zvezi z dohodki kmetov 3Reforma SKP iz leta 2003 je pozornost odvzela poudarek s podpore proizvodnji (ločevanje) in uvedla sistem dohodkovne podpore, ki je v veliki meri temeljil na ravneh pomoči, ki so jo posamezni kmetje prejeli v referenčnem obdobju.
The 2013 reform further detached the payments from their historical context, while gradually moving towards more uniform payments per hectare across all EU Member States. 
Reforma iz leta 2013 je plačila še bolj ločila od njihovega zgodovinskega ozadja ter postopoma uvedla enotnejša plačila na hektar v vseh državah članicah EU.