natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Three examples illustrate this: (a) It emerged during discussions in the ETF that two separate EEAS and Commission (ECHO, DG DEVCO, DG SANCO and FPI) field missions were being organised for the end of October 2014. 
To ponazarjajo trije primeri. (a) Pri razpravah v projektni skupini se je izkazalo, da se za konec oktobra 2014 organizirata dve ločeni terenski misiji ESZD in Komisije (GD ECHO, DEVCO, SANCO in FPI).
Steps were taken to mitigate the risk of overlap and duplication by producing a joint mission report. 
S pripravo skupnega poročila o misiji se je zmanjšalo tveganje prekrivanja in podvajanja.
43 The International Humanitarian Partnership (IHP) is a network between seven European emergency management agencies. 
43 Mednarodno humanitarno partnerstvo (IHP) je mreža sedmih evropskih agencij za obvladovanje izrednih razmer.
The member countries of the IHP are also UCPM Participating States, but they nevertheless gave a presentation to the ETF on their activities as IHP members. 
Države članice IHP so tudi sodelujoče države mehanizma UCPM, vendar so projektni skupini kljub temu predstavile svoje dejavnosti v okviru članstva v IHP.
Observations 30 (b) DG SANTE was able to channel the information shared in the Task Force towards the HSC, and to help plan and develop the DG SANTE and ECHO-organised workshops (on, for example, safety and control issues and the European Medical Corps). (c) ECDC staff and epidemiologists from ECDC fellowship programmes were deployed through the WHO’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN) to support epidemiological investigations at the district level, including case finding and contact tracing. 
Opažanja 30 (b) GD SANTE je lahko posredoval informacije, izmenjane v okviru delovne skupine, Odboru za zdravstveno varnost ter prispeval k načrtovanju in pripravi delavnice v skupni organizaciji GD SANTE in GD ECHO (na primer o vprašanjih varnosti in nadzora ter evropskih zdravstvenih silah). (c) Osebje ECDC in epidemiologi programa podiplomskih štipendij ECDC so bili napoteni v okviru svetovne mreže za opozarjanje in odzivanje na izbruhe, ki deluje pri SZO (GOARN), da bi delovali kot podpora pri lokalnih epidemioloških preiskavah, tudi pri odkrivanju primerov in sledenju stikom.
While the cooperation between the epidemiologists and the WHO was considered to have worked well on the whole, the ECDC reported to the ETF that the deployed experts had faced considerable logistical problems. 
Sodelovanje med epidemiologi in SZO naj bi na splošno potekalo dobro, vendar je ECDC poročal projektni skupini, da so imeli napoteni strokovnjaki velike logistične težave.
ECHO subsequently launched a mission to identify ways of improving the support for the teams. 
GD ECHO je zato pripravil misijo, ki naj bi našla načine za izboljšanje podpore ekipam.
66 During the Ebola outbreak, the fact that there was no guarantee of a medevac for (potentially) infected international healthcare and humanitarian aid workers deterred some such individuals from accepting deployment to the region. 
66 Med izbruhom ebole je to, da ni bilo nobenega zagotovila za medicinsko evakuacijo (morebiti) okuženih mednarodnih zdravstvenih in humanitarnih delavcev, nekatere posameznike odvrnilo od tega, da bi sprejeli napotitev v regijo.
The collaboration both within and without the ETF between ECHO, DG SANTE and the WHO to establish an EU medevac system represents an example of effective coordination, although this took a long time to develop considering the urgency and central importance of the need (see Box 4). 
Sodelovanje v okviru projektne skupine za ebolo in zunaj nje med GD ECHO, GD SANTE in SZO, katerega namen je bil vzpostaviti sistem EU za medicinsko evakuacijo, je primer uspešnega usklajevanja, čeprav je vzpostavitev sistema glede na nujnost in bistvenost te potrebe trajala dolgo (glej okvir 4).
The development of the EU medevac system was a complex and lengthy operation The acute need for medical evacuations of humanitarian aid workers and healthcare workers was expressed by MSF and the United Nations in August and September 2014 respectively44. ECHO worked closely with DG SANTE and the WHO to develop standard operating procedures for an EU medevac system, which were approved by the HSC on 14 October. 
Vzpostavitev sistema EU za medicinske evakuacije (medevac) je bila zapletena in dolgotrajna operacija Nujno potrebo po medicinski evakuaciji humanitarnih in zdravstvenih delavcev so avgusta oz. septembra 2014 izrazili organizacija Zdravniki brez meja in Združeni narodi.44 GD ECHO je tesno sodeloval z GD SANCO in SZO pri pripravi standardnih operativnih postopkov za sistem EU za medicinsko evakuacijo, ki jih je 14. oktobra odobril Odbor za zdravstveno varnost.
In parallel, the Commission looked for means of transport (planes) in both the civil/commercial45 and military domain46. 
Hkrati je Komisija iskala prevozna sredstva (letala) v civilnem/komer-cialnem45 in vojaškem letalstvu46.
After the Commission was unable to get the Participating States to commit to making civil assets available for medical evacuation efforts, on 5 September 2014 ECHO formally asked the EEAS to activate its EU Movement and Planning Cell (EUMPC), with the aim of finding a solution involving use of military assets. 
Ker Komisija ni mogla prepričati sodelujočih držav, naj za namene medicinske evakuacije dajo na voljo civilna sredstva, je GD ECHO 5. septembra 2014 uradno zaprosil ESZD, naj aktivira svojo celico EU za načrtovanje premikov (EUMPC), da bi našla rešitev z uporabo vojaških sredstev.
Despite the close collaboration between ECHO and the EUMPC, Member States’ willingness to commit military assets was very limited. 
Kljub tesne-mu sodelovanju med GD ECHO in EUMPC je bila pripravljenost držav članic, da dajo na voljo vojaška sredstva, zelo majhna.
The lack of previous experience in this area, the absence of ready-made technical solutions and the time required to adapt the assets and register them posed further considerable obstacles to timely delivery. 
Pomanjkanje predhodnih izkušenj na tem področju, to, da ni bilo vnaprej pripravljenih tehničnih rešitev, in čas, potreben za prilagoditev sredstev in njihovo registracijo, so bili znatne nadaljnje ovire za pravočasno izvedbo projekta.
Eventually the EU medevac system was completed when Luxembourg pledged two planes to the voluntary pool, and it became available from mid February 2015. 
Nazadnje je bil sistem EU za zdravstveno evakuacijo vzpostavljen, ko je Luksemburg v prostovoljni nabor namenil dve letali, na voljo pa je od februarja 2015.
44 The acute need for medical evacuation was expressed explicitly by MSF on 11 August 2014; the UN OCHA sent a request for medical evacuation capacities to the ERCC and NATO on 1 September 2014. 
44 Organizacija Zdravniki brez meja je nujnost potrebe po medicinskih evakuacijah izrecno izrazila 11. avgusta 2014; urad ZN OCHA pa je poslal zahtevek za vzpostavitev zmogljivosti za medicinsko evakuacijo ERCC in organizaciji NATO 1. septembra 2014.
45 Although Member States were able to carry out medical evacuations on a bilateral basis, and the Commission had a commercial option available, this was not considered sufficient. 
45 Države članice so bile sicer sposobne opravljati medicinske evakuacije na dvostranski ravni, Komisija pa je imela pripravljene možnosti komercialnih poletov, vendar to ni bilo ocenjeno kot zadostno.
46 It can be activated through a formal request from ECHO when no civil alternatives can fulfil the needs in a given crisis (in principle, military solutions should always be the last resort). 
46 Ta možnost se lahko aktivira na podlagi uradnega zahtevka GD ECHO, kadar s civilnimi sredstvi ni mogoče zadovoljiti potreb v neki krizni situaciji (načeloma morajo biti vojaške rešitve vedno zadnja možnost).
Observations 31 The Commission does not make full use of the information at its disposal to report on both its own and the UCPM’s overall performance 67 In ECHO’s annual management plans and activity reports, the Commission has defined one indicator relating to the response phase of a disaster47, more specifically to the timeliness of the response. 
Opažanja 31 Komisija v celoti ne izkorišča informacij, ki so ji na voljo, da bi poročala o svoji splošni uspešnosti in splošni uspešnosti mehanizma Unije na področju civilne zaščite 67 Komisija je v letnih načrtih upravljanja in poročilih o dejavnostih GD ECHO opredelila en kazalnik, ki se nanaša na fazo odzivanja na nesreče47, natančneje na pravočasnost odziva.
However, the indicator covers elements outside the Commission’s control48. 
Vendar kazalnik zajema elemente, na katere Komisija ne more vplivati48.
This makes accounting for its own performance difficult. 
Zaradi tega je težko odgovorna za svojo uspešnost.
68 The UCPM’s main communication tool, CECIS, does not capture performance data in an automated, structured way, making identifying performance data a manual, time-consuming exercise. 
68 Glavno komunikacijsko orodje mehanizma UCPM, CECIS, podatkov o uspešnosti ne zajema avtomatizirano in strukturirano, zato mora iskanje podatkov o uspešnosti potekati ročno, kar je zamudna naloga.
Since the dataset that can be automatically exploited by the system is limited, CECIS cannot produce detailed reports or management information on the operational efficiency of the different steps of an emergency response — whether or not those steps are under the Commission’s direct control. 
Ker je nabor podatkov, ki ga lahko sistem samodejno uporabi, omejen, CECIS ne more pripraviti podrobnih poročil ali upravljavskih informacij o operativni učinkovitosti različnih korakov pri odzivanju v izrednih razmerah – ne glede na to, ali so ti koraki pod neposrednim vplivom Komisije ali ne.
69 The absence of quantitative performance statistics on, for example, timeliness or outstanding requests awaiting offers deprives the Commission and the Participating States of essential information to measure UCPM performance and its added value, which could help strengthen its continued acceptance by its stakeholders. 
69 Ker ni kvantitativnih statističnih podatkov o učinkovitosti, na primer v zvezi s pravočasnostjo ali odprtimi prošnjami, ki čakajo na ponudbe, Komisija in sodelujoče države nimajo bistvenih informacij za merjenje uspešnosti in dodane vrednosti mehanizma UCPM, kar bi lahko okrepilo njegovo trajno sprejetost med deležniki.
47 Result indicator 1: Average speed of interventions under the UCPM (from offer acceptance to deployment). 
47 Kazalnik rezultatov 1: povprečna hitrost intervencij v okviru mehanizma Unije na področju civilne zaščite (od sprejetja ponudbe do napotitve).
48 For example, resources made available by Participating States, or nominations of Participating States’ experts. 
48 Na primer, sredstva, ki jih dajo na voljo sodelujoče države, ali imenovanje strokovnjakov iz sodelujočih držav.
Conclusions and 32 recommendations 70 We conclude that the Commission has been broadly effective in facilitating the coordination of responses to disasters outside the Union since the beginning of 2014. 
Zaključki in priporočila 32 70 Sodišče je prišlo do zaključka, da je bila Komisija pri omogočanju lažjega usklajevanja odzivov na nesreče zunaj Unije od začetka leta 2014 na splošno uspešna.
Our overall assessment has been confirmed by all the Participating States that responded to our questionnaire. 
Našo splošno oceno so potrdile vse sodelujoče države, ki so odgovorile na naš vprašalnik.
They expressed satisfaction with the role played by the Commission in facilitating coordination. 
Izrazile so zadovoljstvo z vlogo, ki jo je imela Komisija pri olajševanju usklajevanja.
71 For each of the three disasters we examined, activation of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) was timely (see paragraphs 17 to 19), and the EU civil protection teams (EUCP teams) facilitated coordination on the ground with Participating States’ teams (see paragraphs 26 to 27). 
71 Pri vsaki od treh nesreč, ki smo jih preučili, je bil mehanizem Unije na področju civilne zaščite (UCPM) sprožen pravočasno (glej odstavke 17 do 19), ekipe EU za civilno zaščito (ekipe EUCP) pa so olajševale usklajevanje na terenu z ekipami sodelujočih držav (glej odstavka 26 in 27).
The Commission’s facilitation of coordination is strengthened through the widespread dissemination of information products, which were considered useful (see paragraphs 55 to 57). 
Komisija olajševanje usklajevanja podpira z obsežnim razširjanjem informacijskih izdelkov, ki so šteli za koristne (glej odstavke 55 do 57).
72 The Commission adopted an inclusive approach towards coordination amongst its own services, as well as with other EU and non-EU bodies (see paragraphs 34 to 37; and paragraphs 58 to 66). 
72 Pristop Komisije k usklajevanju med lastnimi službami ter z drugimi organi EU in organi izven EU je bil vključujoč (glej odstavke 34 do 37; in odstavke 58 do 66).
Although the degree to which EU coordination activities were integrated into the UN system varied between disasters, we conclude that the Commission respected the UN’s overall lead (see paragraphs 41 to 46). 
Čeprav je bila stopnja vključenosti usklajevalnih dejavnosti EU v sistem ZN pri posameznih nesrečah različna, je Sodišče prišlo do zaključka, da je Komisija spoštovala splošno vodilno vlogo ZN (glej odstavke 41 do 46).
The Commission’s coordination role extended to the end phase of the responses, taking steps to ensure a smooth transition into the recovery phase (see paragraphs 47 to 48). 
Usklajevalna vloga Komisije je potekala do končne faze odziva, Komisija pa je izvajala tudi ukrepe za zagotovitev nemotenega prehoda v fazo okrevanja (glej odstavka 47 in 48).
73 An important innovation of the legislation establishing the UCPM has been the development of the European Emergency Response Capacity (or ‘voluntary pool’), which establishes pre-committed resources for response. 
73 Pomembna novost zakonodaje, s katero je bil vzpostavljen mehanizem Unije na področju civilne zaščite, je bila vzpostavitev evropskih zmogljivosti za nujni odziv ( ali prostovoljni nabor), ki združuje predhodno odrejena sredstva za odzivanje na nesreče.
The development of the voluntary pool has been slow, meaning that the Commission was not in a position to recommend the deployment of specific assets in its response to the disasters we examined. 
Razvoj prostovoljnega nabora je bil počasen, saj Komisija pri svojem odzivanju na nesreče, ki jih je preučilo Sodišče, ni mogla priporočiti napotitve specifičnih sredstev.
Nevertheless, the Commission played an important role in extending the scope of the pool when needed (see paragraphs 28 to 32). 
Kljub temu je imela Komisija pomembno vlogo pri povečanju nabora, kadar je bilo to potrebno (glej odstavke 28 do 32).
Conclusions and recommendations 33 74 Notwithstanding our overall conclusion, we found a number of areas for further improvement. 
Zaključki in priporočila 33 74 Ne glede na naš splošni zaključek smo odkrili več področij, na katerih so še potrebne izboljšave.
The Commission could gain time during the pre-alert phase and during the selection and deployment of the EUCP teams (see paragraphs 20 to 25). A number of features in CECIS, the Commission’s communication and information platform, could be further improved (see paragraphs 49 to 54). 
Komisija bi lahko prihranila čas v fazi vnaprejšnjega opozorila ter med izborom in napotitvijo ekip EUCP (glej odstavke 20 do 25); Več funkcij v sistemu CECIS, komunikacijski in informacijski platformi Komisije, bi se lahko nadalje izboljšalo (glej odstavke 49 do 54).
There is room for further enhancement of on-the-ground coordination, and more synergies could be sought between civil protection and humanitarian aid operations (see paragraphs 38 to 40). 
Mogoče bi bilo dodatno izboljšati usklajevanje na terenu in poiskati več sinergij med operacijami civilne zaščite in humanitarne pomoči (glej odstavke 38 do 40).
The Commission’s and ECDC’s financial and administrative arrangements did not lend themselves well to the large-scale deployment of epidemiologists through the UCPM during the Ebola crisis (see paragraph 33). 
Obstoječe finančne in upravne ureditve Komisije in ECDC niso bile najbolj primerne za obsežne napotitve epidemiologov prek mehanizma UCPM med krizo zaradi ebole (glej odstavek 33).
Finally, the Commission could improve UCPM performance reporting (see paragraphs 67 to 69). 
Komisija bi lahko izboljšala tudi poročanje o uspešnosti mehanizma UCPM (glej odstavke 67 do 69).
We make five recommendations below to address these points. 
Sodišče za obravnavo teh zadev izreka pet priporočil.
Recommendation 1 — Gaining time in the critical early stages of a response The Commission should: (a) make earlier use of the pre-alert phase in CECIS for slow-onset disasters– as soon as first indicators of impact and/or needs arise — to allow Participating States to mobilise resources ahead of UCPM activation; (b) following requests for assistance, send out requests for nominations of experts immediately if a substantial response from Participating States to a major disaster can be reasonably expected; (c) identify ways to speed up the selection and deployment of EUCP teams, and invite Participating States to develop, together with the Commission, peer-based expert performance evaluations as well as post-mission feedback sessions between the team and Commission headquarters; (d) develop a written log of any contact made with Participating States having close ties to the affected country, which may therefore be in a good position to assist. 
Priporočilo 1 – Prihranek časa v ključnih začetnih fazah odziva Komisija naj: (a) pri nesrečah s počasnim začetkom bolj zgodaj uporabi fazo vnaprejšnjega opozorila v sistemu CECIS – takoj ko se pokažejo prvi znaki negativnega vpliva in/ali pojavijo potrebe – ter tako omogoči sodelujočim državam, da mobilizirajo sredstva pred aktivacijo mehanizma UPCM; (b) po prejetju prošenj za pomoč takoj razpošlje zahteve za imenovanje strokovnjakov, kadar se lahko razumno pričakuje obsežen odziv sodelujočih držav na veliko nesrečo; (c) opredeli načine, kako pospešiti izbor in napotitev ekip EUCP, ter pozove sodelujoče države, da skupaj s Komisijo pripravijo ocene uspešnosti strokovnjakov, ki bodo temeljile na medsebojnem pregledu, ter sestanke ekipe in sedeža Komisije za obravnavo povratnih informacij po opravljenih misijah; (d) pripravi register, kjer bodo vpisani vsi stiki s sodelujočimi državami, ki imajo tesne vezi s prizadeto državo in zato lahko ponudijo pomoč.
Target implementation date: end of first half of 2017 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: do konca prve polovice leta 2017.
Conclusions and recommendations 34 Recommendation 2 — Improving CECIS’ features In order to improve the overview of assistance provided and requested, to allow for a better follow-up of priorities and to enhance user-friendliness, the Commission should redesign a number of key features in CECIS, including: (a) automating the gap analyses of requests made versus requests fulfilled and introducing a sorting option; (b) providing EUCP teams in the field with a simplified, real-time version of the summary of requests and offers; (c) automating the workflow for transport support requests to enable a faster end-to-end process and the production of statistics and real-time overviews; (d) taking further steps to filter operational and administrative messages effectively and identifying measures to strengthen the usage of this feature. 
Zaključki in priporočila 34 Priporočilo 2 – Izboljšanje funkcij sistema CECIS Za boljši pregled nad zaprošeno in zagotovljeno pomočjo, ki bi omogočil boljše nadaljnje spremljanje prednostnih nalog in zagotovil večjo prijaznost do uporabnika, naj Komisija preoblikuje več ključnih funkcij sistema CECIS, med drugim naj: (a) avtomatizira analizo vrzeli med vloženimi in izpolnjenimi prošnjami za pomoč in uvede možnost razvrščanja; (b) ekipam EUCP na terenu zagotovi poenostavljeno različico povzetka prošenj in ponudb za pomoč v realnem času; (c) avtomatizira potek postopka pri prošnjah za podporo pri prevozu, da bi omogočila hitrejši proces od začetka do konca, pripravo statistike in preglede v realnem času; (d) izvede nadaljnje ukrepe za uspešno filtriranje operativnih in upravnih sporočil ter opredeli ukrepe za spodbujanje uporabe te funkcije. Ciljni rok za uresničitev: Dogovor o zahtevah in akcijski načrt z deležniki: do konca prve polovice leta 2017. Javno naročilo, izvajanje in testiranje: konec leta 2018.
Target implementation date: Agreement of requirements and action plan with stakeholders: end of first half of 2017 Tendering, implementation and testing: end of 2018 Recommendation 3 — Strengthening coordination and potential synergies on the ground The Commission should: (a) enhance the EUCP teams’ reporting from the field by requiring clearer descriptions of the needs assessments carried out and concrete follow-up of identified needs; (b) identify how the ECHO Field Network might be further exploited to support the work of the EUCP teams in general, and situation and needs assessments specifically; (c) identify more opportunities for strengthening reciprocal knowledge between civil protection and humanitarian assistance providers, including those in the UN cluster system; (d) designate ‘civil protection focal points’ within the ECHO Field Network national and regional offices; it should also — together with the EEAS — designate ‘civil protection focal points’ among staff in EUDs in at-risk countries. 
Priporočilo 3 – Krepitev usklajevanja in možnih sinergij na terenu Komisija naj: (a) okrepi poročanje ekip EUCP s terena tako, da zahteva jasnejši opis opravljene ocene potreb in konkretno nadaljnje spremljanje ugotovljenih potreb; (b) opredeli, kako bi lahko bolje izkoristili terensko mrežo GD ECHO, da bi z njo na splošno podpirali delo ekip EUCP, specifično pa ocenjevanje položaja in potreb; (c) opredeli več možnosti za boljše medsebojno poznavanje med akterji na področju zagotavljanja civilne zaščite in humanitarne pomoči, vključno s tistimi iz sistema ZN za usklajevanje po sklopih; (d) določi kontaktne točke za civilno zaščito v nacionalnih in regionalnih uradih terenske mreže GD ECHO; prav tako naj – v sodelovanju z ESZD – določi kontaktne točke za civilno zaščito med osebjem delegacij EU v ogroženih državah.
These focal points, would be provided with regular training on developments in the UCPM and procedures for its activation. 
Za te kontaktne točke bi bilo treba zagotoviti redno usposabljanje o novostih v mehanizmu EUCP in pri postopkih za njegovo aktivacijo.
Target implementation date: end of 2017 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: do konca leta 2017.
Conclusions and recommendations 35 Recommendation 4 — Exploring potential changes to arrangements for deploying epidemiologists In the event that the EU decides to deploy epidemiologists through the UCPM in response to future large-scale emergencies with health consequences outside the Union — and taking full account of WHO’s lead in this regard — the Commission and the ECDC should jointly explore possible changes to the existing administrative and financial arrangements that might facilitate rapid and flexible deployments. 
Zaključki in priporočila 35 Priporočilo 4 – Preučitev možnih sprememb ureditev za napotitev epidemiologov Za primer, če bi se Evropska unija v prihodnosti pri odzivanju na obsežne izredne razmere z zdravstvenimi posledicami zunaj Unije odločila za napotitev epidemiologov prek mehanizma UCPM – in ob upoštevanju vodilne vloge Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije na tem področju –, naj Komisija in ECDC skupaj preučita možnosti za spremembe obstoječih upravnih in finančnih ureditev, s katerimi bi se olajšala hitra in fleksibilna napotitev.