natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This low figure demonstrates indirectly that the value of incubators as important business support centres often fails to be recognised. 
Ta nizka številka posre‐ dno kaže, da vrednost inkubatorjev kot pomembnih centrov za podporo podjetjem pogosto ni priznana.
Observations 22 Monitoring systems within the incubators did not provide adequate management information 49 The Court considers that a monitor‐ ing system should be established in each business incubator. 
Opažanja 22 Sistemi spremljanja znotraj inkubatorjev niso zagotavljali ustreznih upravljavskih informacij 49 Sodišče meni, da bi bilo treba v vsakem podjetniškem inkubatorju vzpostaviti sistem spremljanja.
This system should collect and record statistics and other relevant information about the activity of the incubator and its clients. 
Ta sistem bi zbiral in evidentiral statistične podatke in druge relevantne informacije o dejav‐ nostih inkubatorja in njegovih uporab‐ nikov.
The goal of gathering this information is to assess whether resources were invested effectively and efficiently, and whether they contributed towards achieving strategic objectives. 
Namen zbiranja teh informacij je oceniti, ali so bili viri uspešno in učinkovito investirani ter ali so prispe‐ vali k dosegi strateških ciljev.
These objectives can only be achieved when business data is obtained from the incubator’s management system as well as from incubated companies in the form of standardised financial and activity indicators. 
Ti cilji se lahko dosežejo le, če sistem upravljanja inkubatorja in tudi inkubirana podjetja zagotovijo poslovne podatke v obliki standardiziranih finančnih kazalnikov in kazalnikov o dejavnostih.
50 Only 15 out of 27 incubators had put in place a system whereby incubation activities were regularly observed and recorded. 
50 Samo 15 inkubatorjev od 27 je uvedlo sistem, s katerim so se redno spremlja‐ le in evidentirale dejavnosti inkuba‐ torja.
The collection of data in the remaining incubators was limited to the mandatory statistics required by accounting rules and tax regula‐ tions. 
Zbiranje podatkov v preostalih inkubatorjih je bilo omejeno na obve‐ zne statistične podatke, ki jih zahte‐ vajo računovodska pravila in davčni predpisi.
Incubators were often unable to provide detailed financial data on the value of the aid granted to each of their clients. 
Inkubatorji pogosto niso mogli zagotoviti podrobnih finančnih podatkov o vrednosti pomoči, dodelje‐ ne posameznim uporabnikom.
This makes it more dif‐ ficult to properly assess their incuba‐ tion activity. 
Zaradi tega je še težje pravilno oceniti njihovo dejavnost inkubatorja.
The practice of integrat‐ ing data concerning clients’ business activity with the incubator’s monitor‐ ing data was even more infrequent. 
Še redkejša je bila praksa vključevanja podatkov o poslovnih dejavnostih uporabnikov v podatke o spremljanju, ki jih zbirajo inkubatorji.
Some incubators did not collect basic performance data because they had only a limited amount of oversight over their clients’ development. 
Nekateri inkubatorji niso pridobili osnovnih podatkov o smo‐ trnosti poslovanja, ker so imeli zgolj omejen nadzor nad razvojem svojih uporabnikov.
Only 5 out of 27 incubators used their clients’ performance data to improve the man‐ agement of their facility. 
Samo 5 inkubatorjev od 27 je uporabilo podatke o smotr‐ nosti poslovanja svojih uporabnikov za izboljšanje upravljanja inkubatorja.
An example of an incubator which did so is given in Box 2. 
Primer inkubatorja, ki je te podatke uporabil, je opisan v okviru 2.
Good practice — Integrated monitoring system One of the most successful audited incubators in the Czech Republic regularly monitored the performance of hosted companies and the relevance and quality of the support offered to them. 
Dobra praksa – Celovit sistem spremljanja Eden najuspešnejših revidiranih inkubatorjev na Češkem je redno spremljal smotrnost poslovanja gostujočih podjetij ter ustreznost in kakovost podpore, ki jim jo je zagotavljal.
To do so, the incubator had developed a system of key performance indicators integrating exhaustive information about the activ‐ ity of the incubator (e.g. number of training sessions organised, number of lectures given) and the perfor‐ mance of hosted companies (e.g. turnover, number of patents applied for, number of full‐time equivalent jobs created). 
V ta namen je razvil sistem ključnih kazal‐ nikov smotrnosti poslovanja, ki vključuje izčrpne informacije o dejavnostih inkubatorja (npr. število organizira‐ nih izobraževanj, število predavanj) in smotrnosti poslovanja gostujočih podjetij (npr. promet, število paten‐ tov, za katere so bile poslane vloge, število ustvarjenih delovnih mest z ekvivalentom polnega delovnega časa).
The resulting information was used by the management to assess the effectiveness of incubation programmes. 
Tako pridobljene informacije je vodstvo uporabilo za oceno uspešnosti programov inkubiranja.
Box 2 Observations 23 51 All of the monitoring systems used by the incubators which did carry out measurements of their activity involved performance indicators. 
Okvir 2 Opažanja 23 51 Vsi sistemi spremljanja, ki so jih upora‐ bljali inkubatorji, ki so merili svoje de‐ javnosti, so vključevali kazalnike smotr‐ nosti poslovanja.
However, only in 10 out of 27 cases were these defined with reference to standards set out by recognised na‐ tional or international organisations16. 
Vendar pa so bili ti le v 10 primerih od 27 oblikovani ob upoštevanju standardov, ki so jih dolo‐ čile priznane nacionalne ali mednaro‐ dne organizacije16.
This lack of standardisation made it more difficult to compare individual incubators’ performance with available benchmarking data or to assess their impact on the local economy. 
Zaradi pomanjkanja standardizacije je bilo še težje primer‐ jati smotrnost poslovanja posameznih inkubatorjev z referenčnimi podatki, ki so na voljo, ali oceniti njihov učinek na lokalno gospodarstvo.
Incubators’ financial sustainability was conflicting with the objective of providing adequate incubation services to relevant businesses 52 The Court considers that a relevant business model should allow an incu‐ bator to achieve its strategic objec‐ tives, taking into account economic constraints. 
Finančna vzdržnost inkubatorja je bila v nasprotju s ciljem zagotavljanja ustreznih storitev inkubatorja zadevnim podjetjem 52 Sodišče meni, da bi moral ustrezen poslovni model inkubatorju omogočati dosego strateških ciljev ob upošteva‐ nju ekonomskih omejitev.
This should mean that the incubator is selective in providing sup‐ port and services to a targeted group of tenants. 
To bi moralo pomeniti, da je inkubator pri nudenju podpore in storitev ciljni skupini na‐ jemnikov selektiven.
Only those entrepreneurs who are able to put forward feasible, innovative and competitive busi‐ ness ideas should be supported. 
Podpirati bi bilo treba samo podjetnike, ki lahko obli‐ kujejo izvedljive, inovativne in konku‐ renčne poslovne ideje.
That means that appropriate entry criteria should be in place, and that scouting activity should take place to ensure that a sufficient number of quality candidates are available. 
To pomeni, da bi bilo treba uvesti ustrezna vstopna merila in da bi morale potekati poiz‐ vedbene dejavnosti za zagotovitev, da je na voljo zadostno število kakovo‐ stnih kandidatov.
53 Incubation activity is not usually a profitable endeavour: support and services are provided free of charge or at a rate which is not sufficient to cover the incubator’s costs. 
53 Dejavnosti inkubatorja običajno niso donosne, saj se podpora in storitve zagotavljajo brezplačno ali po ceni, ki ne zadostuje za kritje stroškov inkubatorja.
In the audited population of 27 incubators, only 7 had made sure that the finan‐ cial support provided by stakeholders would be continuously available. 
V revidirani populaciji 27 inkubatorjev jih je le 7 zagotovilo, da bo finančna podpora, ki jo zagotavljajo deležniki, neprekinjeno na voljo.
An example of such an arrangement is described in Box 3. 
Pri‐ mer take ureditve je opisan v okviru 3.
The other 20 incu‐ bators were intended to be financially self‐sustaining; this forced them to focus excessively on the financial side of their activity. 
Preostalih 20 inkubatorjev bi moralo biti po načrtih finančno samozado‐ stnih, zaradi česar so se bili prisiljeni prekomerno osredotočati na finančni del svojih dejavnosti.
54 As a result, audited incubators de‐ pended heavily on income generated internally from incubation activities (mainly office space rental), which ac‐ counted for 72 % of their total revenue. 
54 Zaradi tega so bili revidirani inkuba‐ torji močno odvisni od prihodkov, ustvarjenih znotraj inkubatorja v okvi‐ ru njegovih dejavnosti (zlasti z oddaja‐ njem pisarniških prostorov v najem), ki so predstavljali 72 % vseh prihodkov.
In the benchmarked population of EC‐BIC incubators, this activity gener‐ ated only 34 % of revenue and the rest was covered by public and private funding. 
Med referenčnimi inkubatorji z ozna‐ ko EC‐BIC je bilo s temi dejavnostmi ustvarjenih le 34 % prihodkov, preosta‐ li del pa se je kril iz javnega in zaseb‐ nega financiranja.
55 In order to minimise their structural deficit, audited incubators whose con‐ tinued financing was not guaranteed were forced to reduce their costs and maximise their income. 
55 Revidirani inkubatorji, ki niso imeli zagotovljenega neprekinjenega fi‐ nanciranja, so bili zaradi zmanjševanja svojega strukturnega primanjkljaja prisiljeni znižati stroške in čim bolj po‐ večati dohodke.
Cost reduc‐ tions inevitably led to reductions in the level of support offered, and to simplified incubation programmes. 
Znižanja stroškov so neizogibno povzročila znižanje stopnje nudene podpore in poenostavitev programov inkubiranja.
It also meant that fewer resources were available for carrying out scouting activities. 
Pomenila so tudi, da je bilo za izvajanje dejavnosti poizvedovanja na voljo manj virov.
As office rental was the main source of income, incubators had at‐ tempted to maximise this. 
Ker je bila oddaja pisarn glavni vir dohod‐ kov, so inkubatorji skušali to dejavnost kar se da povečati.
16 There are various organisations publishing this type of information. 
16 To vrsto informacij objavljajo različne organizacije.
They include the European Business and Innovation Network, the US National Business Incubation Association and the European Commission. 
Te vključujejo Evropsko mrežo poslovnih in inovacijskih centrov, Ameriško združenje podjetniških inkubatorjev in Evropsko komisijo.
Observations 24 Good practice — Financial support from the parent organisation In Spain, in order to ensure stable operations and financial sustainability, the chambers of commerce, the organisations by which the incubators were managed, had formally committed themselves to making up any yearly deficit. 
Opažanja 24 Dobra praksa – Finančna podpora matične organizacije V Španiji so trgovinske zbornice, ki so tudi organizacije, ki upravljajo inkubatorje, želele zagotoviti nemote‐ no delovanje in finančno vzdržnost, zato so se formalno zavezale, da bodo nadomestile vsak morebitni letni primanjkljaj.
This formal commitment is tangible evidence of the willingness of the incubators’ stakeholders to take part in the business creation policy, which is perceived as a public mission coherent with the activity of the parent organisation. 
Ta formalna zaveza je otipljiv dokaz pripravljenosti deležnikov inkubatorja, da sodelujejo v po‐ litiki ustanavljanja podjetij, ki se dojema kot poslanstvo v interesu javnosti, skladno z dejavnostmi matične organizacije.
56 The number of applicants rarely ex‐ ceeded a few per month, even in the busiest audited facilities. 
56 Število prosilcev je celo v najbolj aktivnih revidiranih inkubatorjih redko presegalo nekaj na mesec.
Incubators therefore had little incentive to oper‐ ate a formal entry procedure in which potential clients were selected on the basis of an examination of the level of innovation and potential for growth of the business ideas which they were proposing. 
Zato inku‐ batorji niso imeli veliko spodbude za uporabo formalnega postopka vstopa, pri katerem bi se morebitni uporabniki izbirali na podlagi pregleda stopnje inovativnosti in potenciala za rast pri poslovnih idejah.
57 This allowed businesses with a lower potential for growth to move into the incubator, reducing the efficiency with which incubators’ resources were used. 
57 Zato so se lahko inkubatorju priključila podjetja z nižjim potencialom za rast, s tem pa se je zmanjšala učinkovitost uporabe virov inkubatorja.
58 Due to insufficient financing and a lack of external funding (e.g. from a share‐ holder), 8 out of 27 audited incubators had to limit the scope of the incuba‐ tion support which they offered after their ERDF grant agreement expired. 
58 Zaradi nezadostnih finančnih sredstev in pomanjkanja zunanjega financiranja (npr. s strani delničarjev) je moralo 8 revidiranih inkubatorjev od 27 po prenehanju sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev iz ESRR omejiti obseg podpo‐ re inkubatorja, ki so jo nudili.
In four cases, they had completely aban‐ doned incubation activity, turning themselves into normal commercial office suites with no business support function. 
V štirih primerih so povsem opustili dejavnosti inkubatorja in se preoblikovali v nava‐ dne pisarniške prostore komercialne narave brez vsakršnih podpornih dejavnosti za podjetja.
Weak selection criteria and a lack of development goals for hosted com‐ panies had a negative impact on the effectiveness of the incubators audit‐ ed, and adversely affected the overall efficiency of their incubation activities. 
Šibka izbirna merila in pomanjkanje razvojnih ciljev za gostujoča podjetja so negativno vplivali na uspešnost revidiranih inkubatorjev in tudi na splošno učinkovitost njihovih dejavno‐ sti inkubatorja.
ERDF management systems did not focus on the efficiency of the services provided by business incubators 59 These audit results, including the sup‐ porting benchmarking data, clearly indicate that audited incubators did not provide their services efficiently enough. 
Sistemi upravljanja ESRR se niso osredotočali na učinkovitost storitev, ki so jih zagotavljali podjetniški inkubatorji 59 Ti revizijski rezultati, vključno s spre‐ mljajočimi referenčnimi podatki, jasno kažejo, da revidirani inkubatorji niso dovolj učinkovito zagotavljali svojih storitev.
This means that it is par‐ ticularly important to examine ERDF management systems established by managing authorities covering the ex‐ penditure of public funds. 
To pomeni, da je izredno pomembno, da se pregledajo sistemi upravljanja ESRR, ki so jih vzpostavili organi upravljanja, pristojni za porabo javnih sredstev.
The Court’s assessment focused on two important issues: how projects to be co‐funded were selected, and how the sustain‐ ability of their operations was ensured. 
Ocena Sodišča se je osredotočala na dve pomembni vpra‐ šanji: kako so bili projekti, ki naj bi bili sofinancirani, izbrani in kako je bila za‐ gotovljena trajnost njihovih dejavnosti. Okvir 3
The Court noted in particular that, in one third of cases, co‐funding was tion activity 60 granted for projects where it could The Court considers that public au‐ thorities should generally design aid measures in a way which takes into account the needs identified by their enterprise policy and which ensures sustainability and an adequate return from invested public funds in the form of new SMEs and jobs. 
Opažanja 25 V postopku za izbiro inkubatorjev se niso ustrezno upoštevali nekateri elementi, ključni za dejavnosti inkubatorjev 60 Sodišče meni, da bi morali javni organi ukrepe pomoči na splošno oblikovati tako, da se upoštevajo potrebe, ugo‐ tovljene v okviru politike podjetja, ter da se zagotovita trajnost in ustrezno povračilo investiranih javnih sredstev v obliki novih MSP in delovnih mest.
The scope and relevance of the incubation services which would be offered, and in particular of incubation pro‐ grammes, was not assessed during 61 the process for approving grants The two project implementation phases described in the introduction in connection with business incubators (c) (see paragraph 9) are reflected in the ERDF management procedures applied by managing authorities. 
Zato bi morali biti projekti za sofinan‐ ciranje izbrani le, če je zagotovljena njihova prihodnja trajnost. 61 Fazi izvajanja projekta, opisani v uvodu v povezavi s podjetniškimi inkubator‐ ji (glej odstavek 9), se odražata tudi v postopkih upravljanja ESRR, ki jih uporabljajo organi upravljanja.
The ERDF is principally used to co‐finance invest‐ ments in physical infrastructure in EU regions. 
ESRR se večinoma uporablja za sofinanciranje naložb v fizično infrastrukturo v regijah EU.
The management process applied by managing authorities fo‐ cuses mainly on ensuring the effective delivery of physical outputs. for business incubators. 
Proces upravljanja, ki ga uporablja‐ jo organi upravljanja, je osredotočen zlasti na uspešno zagotavljanje fizičnih izložkov.
Financial sustainability. Applicants were not required to provide detailed information about the scope of business support and its expected costs or results. 
Finančna vzdržnost: prosilcem ni bilo treba zagotoviti podrobnih informacij o obsegu podpore podjetjem ter njenih pričakovanih stroških ali rezultatih.
Nor were they required to provide informa‐ tion about their strategies for covering any shortfall in operating expenditure and guaranteeing the continued provision of incubation services. 
Prav tako jim ni bilo treba predložiti informacij o strategijah za kritje kakršnega koli primanjkljaja pri odhodkih za poslovanje in za zagotovitev neprekinjenega nudenja storitev inkubatorja.
The assessment procedure did not evaluate expected benefits for the regional economy. 
Pričakovani učinek projekta: v postopku ocenjevanja niso bile ovrednotene pričakovane kori‐ sti za regionalno gospodarstvo.
The lack of standardised assessment criteria also made it impossible to assess the efficiency of planned projects in terms of the cost per job created or per new SME. 
Pomanjkanje standardiziranih ocenjevalnih meril je onemogočilo tudi ocenitev učinkovitosti načrto‐ vanih projektov v smislu stroškov na ustvarjeno delovno mesto ali na novoustanovljeno MSP. (b) (c) (d)
Observations 26 Project objectives and indicators 63 Some of the project objectives defined in the application were quantified using indicators, with defined targets to be achieved. 
Opažanja 26 Cilji in kazalniki projekta 63 Nekateri cilji projekta, določeni v vlogi, so bili količinsko opredeljeni z uporabo kazalnikov in so vsebovali ožje cilje, ki jih je treba doseči.
Output indicators had been applied appropriately: examples included the number of square metres of office space built, or the number of printers installed. 
Kazalniki izložkov so se ustrezno uporabljali: primeri so vključevali podatke o površini izgraje‐ nega pisarniškega prostora (v kvadra‐ tnih metrih) ali številu nameščenih tiskalnikov.
64 However, none of the visited manag‐ ing authorities had used a system of indicators based on good practice guidelines issued by an experienced national or international grouping of business incubators. 
64 Vendar pa nobeden od obiskanih orga‐ nov upravljanja ni uporabljal sistema kazalnikov iz smernic o dobrih praksah, ki bi jih izdala izkušena nacionalna ali mednarodna skupina podjetniških inkubatorjev.
65 It is particularly important to define indicators precisely in setting objec‐ tives for incubation operations (phase II). 
65 Posebej pomembno je, da se pri do‐ ločanju ciljev dejavnosti inkubatorja natančno opredelijo kazalniki (faza II).
In general, indicators were largely defined by applicants themselves. 
Na splošno so kazalnike v glavnem določili prosilci sami.
66 The lack of structure in the use of indicators to establish specific project objectives and to monitor the op‐ erational activity also had an impact on the overall efficiency of public spending. 
66 Premalo strukturirana uporaba kazal‐ nikov pri določanju specifičnih ciljev projekta in spremljanju operativne dejavnosti je vplivala tudi na splošno učinkovitost javne porabe.
Specifically, when signing grant agreements, managing authori‐ ties were unable to ensure that the value of the ERDF grant or the level of co‐financing was proportionate to the results which the applicant ex‐ pected to achieve, or to the impact on local entrepreneurship. 
Natanč‐ neje, organi upravljanja pri podpisu sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev niso mogli zagotoviti, da je vrednost nepovratnih sredstev iz ESRR ali stopnja sofinanciranja sorazmerna z rezultati, ki jih je prosilec nameraval doseči, ali z učinkom na lokalno pod‐ jetništvo.
The benefits of providing public funding were not quantified and assessed at the project selection stage. 
Koristi zagotavljanja javnega financiranja niso bile količinsko opre‐ deljene in ocenjene na stopnji izbire projektov.
Project monitoring and follow-up 67 The physical establishment of incuba‐ tors had generally been monitored properly. 
Spremljanje projektov in nadaljnje ukrepanje 67 Fizična postavitev inkubatorjev se je na splošno pravilno spremljala.
Member State authorities had carried out on‐the‐spot visits and reviews of financial documentation. 
Organi držav članic so izvedli obiske na kraju samem in preglede finančne dokumentacije.
68 However, Member State authorities had not been able to appropriately measure incubators’ effectiveness in achieving results. 
68 Vendar pa organi držav članic niso mogli ustrezno izmeriti uspešnosti inkubatorjev pri doseganju rezultatov.
One main reason for this was that they had not taken steps to ensure that management systems at incubator level would fulfil their basic performance monitoring role. 
Eden glavnih razlogov za to je bil, da niso sprejeli ukrepov za zagotovitev, da sistemi upravljanja na ravni inkuba‐ torja izpolnjujejo svojo osnovno vlogo spremljanja smotrnosti poslovanja.
The lack of adequate results monitoring meant that they had been unable to proper‐ ly follow up the achievement of the anticipated outcomes. 
Pomanjkanje ustreznega spremljanja rezultatov je pomenilo, da niso mogli sprejeti ustreznih nadaljnjih ukrepov za spremljanje doseganja predvidenih izidov.
ERDF co-funded incubators were not required to continue incubation activities for a sufficiently long period of time 69 The Court considers that particular attention needs to be paid to the financial and operational sustainability of co‐financed projects, to the quality of incubation services offered and to the overall expected positive impact on the local, and possibly the wider, economy. 
Inkubatorjem, sofinanciranim iz ESRR, ni bilo treba dovolj dolgo nadaljevati izvajanje dejavnosti inkubatorja 69 Sodišče meni, da je treba posebno po‐ zornost nameniti finančni vzdržnosti in operativni trajnosti sofinanciranih projektov, kakovosti nudenih storitev inkubatorja ter splošnemu pričakova‐ nemu pozitivnemu učinku na lokalno in po možnosti širše gospodarstvo.
Observations 27 70 In this respect, the minimum length of the sustainability period17 (5 years) was not adapted to the characteristics of the business incubation process; nor did it accurately reflect the life cycle of the assets built and purchased with ERDF support (20–30 years)18. 
Opažanja 27 70 V tem smislu minimalno obdobje trajnosti17 (pet let) ni bilo prilagojeno značilnostim procesa podjetniškega inkubiranja niti ni natančno odražalo življenjskega cikla sredstev, zgrajenih in kupljenih s podporo iz ESRR (20–30 let)18.
This meant that managing authorities had relinquished their control over the assets immediately after the minimum sustainability period stipulated in the Structural Funds regulation19 expired. 
To je pomenilo, da so se organi upravljanja odpovedali nadzoru nad sredstvi takoj, ko je preteklo mini‐ malno obdobje trajnosti, določeno v uredbi o strukturnih skladih19.
An example of how a Member State successfully addressed this problem is given in Box 4. 
Primer države članice, ki je uspešno rešila to težavo, je opisan v okviru 4.