natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Observations 28 EDP process: improvements needed to strengthen the basis of the EDP and enhance the objectivity of assessments An appropriate framework for decisions, but greater clarity needed 32 This section examines the Commission’s procedure for analysing the data and assessing compliance prior to recommending a decision. 
Opažanja 28 Proces postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem: za okrepitev podlage postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem in povečanje objektivnosti ocen so potrebne izboljšave Okvir za sklepe je ustrezen, vendar je potrebna večja jasnost 32 V tem oddelku je preučen postopek Komisije za analiziranje podatkov in ocenjevanje skladnosti, preden se priporoči sklep.
The Commission examines extensively the quality of the statistical data... 
Komisija obširno preučuje kakovost statističnih podatkov ...
33 Eurostat is responsible for assessing the quality of the statistical data used in the EDP process. 
33 Eurostat je odgovoren za ocenjevanje kakovosti statističnih podatkov, uporabljenih v postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
Its role in this task has developed significantly since 1993, specifical‐ ly through the introduction of new tools and new discretionary powers (Figure 3 shows how the main legal framework has evolved since the Maastricht Treaty). 
Njegova vloga v okviru te naloge se je v obdobju od leta 1993 do danes zelo razvila, zlasti z uvedbo novih orodij in novih diskrecijskih pooblastil (na sliki 3 je prikazan razvoj glavnega pravnega okvira od Maastrichtske pogodbe).
Observations 29 Evolution of the main legal framework governing Eurostat’s quality assessment of EDP statistics 1993 1997 2005 Definition of the data (planned deficit and actual deficit and debt) to be provided by Member States, as well as periodicity and deadlines. 
Opažanja 29 Razvoj glavnega pravnega okvira, ki ureja Eurostatovo oceno kakovosti statističnih podatkov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem 1993 1997 2005 Opredelitev podatkov (načrtovani primanjkljaj ter dejanski primanjkljaj in dolg), ki jih morajo zagotoviti države članice, ter periodičnosti in rokov.
(Regulation (EC) No 3605/93) Definition of Eurostat’s role and responsabilities (to analyse statistical data, provide advice and support to Member States, promote cooperation and develop statistical methods). 
3605/93) Opredelitev vloge in odgovornosti Eurostata (analiza statističnih podatkov, zagotavljanje svetovanja in podpore državam članicam, spodbujanje sodelovanja in razvoj statističnih metod).
(Commission Decision of 21 April 1997) Member States are required to send new information (planned debt and additional information, including an inventory) within new EDP reporting deadlines, to make EDP data public, to report major revisions and to consult Eurostat on difficult issues. 
(Sklep Komisije z dne 21. aprila 1997) Države članice morajo poslati nove informacije (načrtovani dolg in dodatne informacije, vključno z evidenco) v novih rokih za poročanje o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, objaviti podatke o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, poročati o pomembnih revizijah in se posvetovati z Eurostatom o težavnih vprašanjih.
Eurostat is required to regularly assess the quality of data and to report within three weeks, to carry out dialogue visits and, where necessary, methodological visits. 
Eurostat mora redno ocenjevati kakovost podatkov in o tem v treh tednih predložiti poročilo ter izvajati obiske za dialog in po potrebi metodološke obiske.
Eurostat is given the possibility of expressing reservations as to the quality of actual data or making amendments. 
Eurostat lahko izraža pridržke v zvezi z kakovostjo dejanskih podatkov ali uvede spremembe.
Regulation (EC) No 2103/2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 3605/93) Eurostat is granted access to NSIs and all the data sources in a Member State, and 2011 2014 Source: ECA. 
2103/2005 o spremembah Uredbe št. 3605/93) Eurostatu je odobren dostop do nacionalnih statističnih uradov in vseh virov podatkov v državi članici ter je pooblaščen za odločanje o zadevah v zvezi 2009 z razlago.
(Regulation (EC) No 479/2009, as amended; Regulation (EC) No 223/2009) Possibility of imposing fines where statistics have been manipulated. 
2011 2014 (Uredba (ES) št. 479/2009, kakor je bila spremenjena; Uredba št.
(Council Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011; Commission Delegated Decision of 29 June 2012) Implementation of ESA 2010 in the compilation of EDP data with effect from September 2014. 
1173/2011; Delegirani sklep Komisije z dne 29. junija 2012) Izvajanje ESR 2010 pri zbiranju podatkov o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem z začetkom uporabe septembra 2014.
(Commission Regulation of 7 March 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 479/2009) empowered to decide on matters of interpretation. 
(Uredba Komisije z dne 7. marca 2014 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št.
Observations 30 34 Eurostat has itself made significant further efforts to develop its approach and improve the quality assessment process. 
Opažanja 30 34 Eurostat si je močno dodatno prizadeval za razvoj svojega pristopa in izboljšanje procesa ocenjevanja kakovosti.
Between 2008 and 2014 it introduced many new measures. 
V obdobju 2008−2014 je uvedel veliko novih ukrepov.
Most importantly, in 2011, having reviewed its EDP data quality assessment structures and processes, Eurostat made resourcing and pro‐ cedural changes. 
Najpomembnejše je, da je Eurostat leta 2011 po pregledu svojih struktur in procesov za oceno kakovosti podatkov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem uvedel spremembe na področju financiranja in postopkov.
For example, upstream visits were initiated to assess the quality of the systems generating primary data. 
Na primer, za ocenjevanje kakovosti sistemov, s katerimi se pripravljajo primarni podatki, je začel izvajati „predhodne“ obiske.
See Figure 4 for further details. 
Za podrobnosti glej sliko 4.
Assessment of data quality by Eurostat (main improvements since 2011) Resources Procedures Control 0 dedicated Directorate for Government finance statistics 0 assignment of around 50 staff to EDP work (three times as many as a few years before) 0 establishment of a team of desk officers, each responsible for a maximum of two Member States 0 establishment of a team of methodologists who also take part in missions 0 introduction of standardised procedures and agendas in EDP dialogue visits 0 internal establishment of annual country risk assessments 0 introduction of standardised procedures for the provision of guidance (bilateral and on complex issues) 0 implementation of extensive analysis of EDP notifications and the related questionnaires, allowing a more detailed analysis of deficit and debt 0 introduction of ‘upstream’ dialogue visits 0 more powers granted to access all the EDP data underlying the compilation process 0 power to recommend financial sanctions for deliberate misreporting or serious negligence in the reporting of EDP statistics Source: ECA, based on Eurostat information. 
Eurostatova ocena kakovosti podatkov (glavne izboljšave od leta 2011) Viri Postopki Kontrola 0 poseben direktorat na področju statistike javnih financ 0 razporeditev približno 50 članov osebja za delo, povezano s postopkom v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem (trikrat več kot pred nekaj leti) 0 vzpostavitev skupine referentov, od katerih je vsak odgovoren za največ dve državi članici 0 vzpostavitev skupine strokovnjakov s področja metodologije, ki sodelujejo tudi pri misijah 0 uvedba standardiziranih postopkov in programov obiskov za dialog v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem 0 notranja vzpostavitev letnih ocen državnega tveganja 0 uvedba standardiziranih postopkov za zagotavljanje usmerjanja (dvostranskega in v zvezi z zapletenimi vprašanji) 0 izvajanje obsežne analize obvestil o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem in s tem povezanih vprašalnikov, da bi bila omogočena podrobnejša analizira primanjkljaja in dolga 0 uvedba predhodnih obiskov za dialog 0 večja pooblastila za dostop do vseh podatkov o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, na katerih temelji proces zbiranja 0 pooblastilo za priporočanje denarnih kazni za namerno napačno sporočanje ali hudo malomarnost pri sporočanju statističnih podatkov o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi informacij Eurostata.
Observations 31 ... on the basis of comprehensive and widely disseminated internal rules and guidance... 
Opažanja 31 ... na podlagi izčrpnih in splošno razširjenih notranjih pravil in smernic ...
35 Commission recommendations to launch an EDP are predicated on the results of specific analyses by DG Economic and Financial Affairs. 
35 Priporočila Komisije, da se uvede postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, temeljijo na rezultatih specifičnih analiz GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve.
These analyses are based in turn on a set of internal rules, instructions and guidelines that explain how they are to be performed and describe the most relevant underlying concepts. 
Te analize so pripravljene na podlagi sklopa notranjih pravil, navodil in smernic, ki pojasnjujejo, kako je treba izvesti analize, in opisujejo najpomembnejše temeljne koncepte.
36 Most of these internal rules, instructions and guidelines can be found in a ‘Vade‐ mecum on the Stability and Growth Pact’ (available to the public24) and ‘Specifi‐ cations on the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact’ (also known as the ‘Code of Conduct’25). 
36 Večina teh notranjih pravil, navodil in smernic je navedenih v priročniku Vademe-cum on the Stability and Growth Pact (priročnik o Paktu za stabilnost in rast (javno dostopen24)) in v Podrobnem opisu izvajanja Pakta za stabilnost in rast (imenovanem tudi kodeks ravnanja25).
They address all the most relevant issues. 
V teh dokumentih so obravnavana vsa najpomembnejša vprašanja.
37 Moreover, given the underlying importance of the rules, instructions and guide‐ lines to the Commission’s proposals on the launch of an EDP, DG Economic and Financial Affairs regularly prepares analytical and operational notes for the EFC in order to explain to Member States its approach to interpreting and implementing the SGP. ... applying a widely‐used methodology to produce forecasts... 
37 Poleg tega GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve glede na pomembnost pravil, navodil in smernic za predloge Komisije o začetku postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem redno pripravlja analitične in operativne ugotovitve za Ekonomsko-finančni odbor, da bi državam članicam pojasnil svoj pristop k razlagi in izvajanju Pakta za stabilnost in rast. ... z izvajanjem močno razširjene metodologije za pripravo napovedi ...
38 The Commission’s regular European economic forecasts (spring, autumn and winter) are another important part of its analyses leading to a decision whether or not to propose launching an EDP. 
38 Redne evropske gospodarske napovedi Komisije (spomladanska, jesenska in zimska) so še en pomemben del njenih analiz, ki vpliva na odločitev, ali naj se predlaga začetek izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem ali ne.
The generation of forecasts combines ele‐ ments at country level – prepared by DG Economic and Financial Affairs’s country desks – with centralised elements produced by the horizontal unit (see Box 1). 
V okviru izdelave napovedi se združujejo elementi na državni ravni, ki jih pripravijo skupine, zadolžene za posamezne države v GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve, in centralizirani elementi, ki jih pripravi horizontalna enota (glej okvir 1).
Overall, about 150 staff from different units within DG Economic and Financial Affairs are involved in the process. 
V ta proces je vključenih skupaj približno 150 uslužbencev iz različnih enot GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve.
24 DG Economic and Financial Affairs Occasional Papers 151, May 2013. 
24 GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve, Occasional Papers 151, maj 2013.
25 Specifications on the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact and Guidelines on the format and content of Stability and Convergence Programmes, 3 September 2012. 
25 Podroben opis izvajanja Pakta za stabilnost in rast ter smernice o obliki in vsebini programov stabilnosti in konvergenčnih programov, 3. september 2012.
Observations 32 Generating European economic forecasts Two months before the expected publication date, DG Economic and Financial Affairs prepares a position pa‐ per setting out general assumptions. 
Opažanja 32 Izdelava evropskih gospodarskih napovedi GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve dva meseca pred pričakovanim datumom objave pripravi dokument o stališču, v katerem so opredeljene splošne predpostavke.
Forecasting is then based on an iterative process with cross‐verification to ensure consistency between the country‐level and central forecasts. 
Oblikovanje napovedi temelji na iterativnem procesu z navzkrižnim preverjanjem, da se zagotovi skladnost med napovedmi na ravni države in osrednjimi napovedmi.
The country desks each prepare country‐specific macroeconomic and fiscal forecasts. 
Vse skupine, zadolžene za posamezne države, pripravijo makroekonomske in fiskalne napovedi za državo, za katero so pristojne.
To do this they use a spreadsheet tool based on a centrally‐managed template, as well as additional tools that reflect coun‐ try‐specific characteristics such as data availability and economic structure. 
Pri tem uporabljajo orodje v obliki elektronskih preglednic, ki temelji na centralno upravljani predlogi, in tudi dodatna orodja, ki odražajo značilnosti posamezne države, kot sta razpoložljivost podatkov in gospodarska struktura.
The horizontal unit adds follow‐up calculations based on the projections by the country desks (e.g. the output gap and cyclically‐adjusted fiscal figures) and performs quality checks, which include: ο ensuring that a common set of external assumptions is used; ο checking numerical and economic consistency between country desk forecasts; ο checking the consistency of the country desks’ trade flow projections. 
Horizontalna enota doda nadaljnje izračune, ki temeljijo na projekcijah skupin, zadolženih za posamezne države (npr. podatki o proizvodnih vrzelih in ciklično prilagojeni fiskalni podatki), in izvede preglede kakovosti, ki vključujejo: ο zagotavljanje uporabe skupnega sklopa zunanjih predpostavk, ο preverjanje številske in ekonomske usklajenosti med napovedmi skupin, zadolženih za posamezne države, ο pregledovanje usklajenosti projekcij skupin, zadolženih za posamezne države, o trgovinskih tokovih.
39 The Commission’s forecasting procedure is complex. However, it is structured in a similar way to that of other international organisations (e.g. IMF, OECD, ECB), as a mix of top‐down and bottom‐up elements. 
39 Postopek Komisije za napovedovanje je zapleten, vendar je strukturiran podobno kot tovrstni postopki drugih mednarodnih organizacij (npr. MDS, OECD, ECB), kot mešanica elementov od zgoraj navzdol in od spodaj navzgor.
Furthermore, in terms of overall forecast accuracy, the Commission’s economic forecasts do not deviate significantly from those produced by peer organisations26. 
Poleg tega gospodarske napovedi Komisije, kar zadeva splošno točnost napovedi, ne odstopajo bistveno od napovedi, ki jih pripravijo podobne organizacije26.
40 Compared with those of its peers, the Commission’s country forecasts are more heavily reliant on expert judgement and less on econometric approaches. 
40 Napovedi za države, ki jih pripravi Komisija, se v primerjavi z napovedmi podobnih organizacij bolj opirajo na strokovno presojo in manj na ekonometrične pristope.
This poses difficulties when it comes to evaluating and assessing their validity. 
To povzroča težave v zvezi z vrednotenjem in ocenjevanjem njihove veljavnosti.
26 A number of studies have been carried out in this respect. 
26 V zvezi s tem so bile izvedene številne študije.
Among the most recent are those referred to on p. 
Med najnovejšimi so študije, navedene na strani 27 OECD Economics Department Working Paper št.
27 of OECD Economics Department Working Paper No 1107 (2014), which is available at http://www. keepeek.com/ Digital‐Asset‐Management/ oecd/economics/oecd‐forecas ts‐during‐and‐after‐the‐financ ial‐crisis_5jz73l1qw1s1‐en, and in the Commission’s Economic Paper 476 of December 2012, at http://ec.europa.eu/ economy_finance/ publications/economic_ paper/2012/ecp476_en.htm (this is a comparative analysis of the accuracy of European Commission, IMF and OECD economic forecasts). 
1107 (2014), ki je dostopen na spletnem naslovu http://www.keepeek. com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/ economics/oecd-forecasts-during-and-after-the- financial-crisis_5jz73l1qw1s1-en, in v publikaciji Komisije Economic Paper št. 476 iz decembra 2012, ki je dostopen na spletnem naslovu http:// ec.europa.eu/economy_ finance/publications/ economic_paper/2012/ ecp476_en.htm (to je primerjalna analiza točnosti gospodarskih napovedi Evropske komisije, MDS in OECD).
Observations 33 ... that still lack transparency 41 Some Member State authorities interviewed believe that the forecasting process lacks transparency, in particular with regard to the detailed country‐specific assumptions made for fiscal indicators. 
Opažanja 33 ... vendar preglednost še vedno ni zadovoljiva 41 Nekateri organi držav članic, s katerimi smo opravili razgovore, menijo, da proces napovedovanja ni dovolj pregleden, zlasti v zvezi s podrobnimi predpostavkami glede posameznih držav, pripravljenimi za fiskalne kazalnike.
If differences arise between the Commis‐ sion’s projections and those made nationally, the Member States find it impos‐ sible to evaluate them because the Commission does not sufficiently disclose the details of its assumptions in its talks with national authorities. 
Če se projekcije Komisije razlikujejo od projekcij na nacionalni ravni, jih države članice ne morejo ovrednotiti, ker Komisija v razpravah z nacionalnimi organi ne razkrije v zadostni meri podrobnosti svojih predpostavk.
42 This is consistent with our experience when reviewing the forecasts. Discrepan‐ cies between the Commission’s forecasts and those produced by the Member States can be explained by different underlying assumptions. 
Razhajanja med napovedmi Komisije in napovedmi držav članic je mogoče pojasniti z različnimi osnovnimi predpostavkami, vendar v množici preglednic in strokovnih mnenj ni preprosto ugotoviti, katere predpostavke so krive za razhajanja.
In addition, there is no standard summary (e.g. in the form of a reconciliation table) clearly outlining the differences between the Commission’s and Member States’ esti‐ mates for the fiscal indicators that are used as the basis for the Commission’s recommendations. 
Poleg tega ni standardnega povzetka (npr. v obliki prehodne preglednice), v katerem bi bile jasno opredeljene razlike med ocenami Komisije in ocenami držav članic za fiskalne kazalnike, ki jih Komisija uporablja kot podlago za pripravo priporočil.
43 The above should be seen in the light of the rules, which state that ‘the Commis‐ sion shall make public the methodologies, assumptions and relevant parameters that underpin its macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts’27. 
43 Zgoraj navedeno je treba razumeti ob upoštevanju pravil, ki določajo, da „Komisija objavi metodologije, predpostavke in ustrezne parametre, na katerih temeljijo njene makroekonomske in proračunske napovedi“27.
Nevertheless, the Member State authorities also noted that the Commission’s disclosure of informa‐ tion has significantly improved over the years. 
Vendar pa so organi držav članic navedli tudi, da se je razkrivanje informacij Komisije z leti bistveno izboljšalo.
44 Changes in economic knowledge and the structure of the economy call for continuous improvements to the forecasting process. 
44 Spremembe na področju gospodarskega znanja in strukture gospodarstva zahtevajo nenehne izboljšave procesa napovedovanja.
In recent years, the Com‐ mission has taken a number of steps to enhance its forecasting. 
Komisija je v zadnjih letih sprejela več ukrepov, da bi izboljšala svoje napovedovanje.
For instance, the main forecasting template has been overhauled, the level of detail for some eco‐ nomic sectors has been increased, and an elaborate new tool for detecting ad‐ ditional data inconsistencies has been introduced. 
Tako je na primer preoblikovala glavno predlogo za napovedovanje, zvišala stopnjo podrobnosti za nekatere gospodarske sektorje in uvedla novo, izpopolnjeno orodje za ugotavljanje dodatnih nedoslednosti podatkov.
Furthermore, the Commission is developing a pilot forecast model, initially for the euro area as a whole, and country‐specific modules, with the eventual aim of using the model to deliver quality checks that complement its judgement‐based forecasts28. 
Poleg tega razvija pilotni model za napovedi, ki bi se najprej uporabljal za euroobmočje kot celoto, in module za posamezne države, da bi se model lahko sčasoma uporabljal za izvajanje pregledov kakovosti, ki dopolnjujejo napovedi na osnovi presoje28.
27 Article 4(2) of Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8 November 2011 on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States (OJ L 306, 23.11.2011, p. 
27 Člen 4(2) Direktive Sveta 2011/85/EU z dne 8. novembra 2011 o zahtevah v zvezi s proračunskimi okviri držav članic (UL L 306, 23.11.2011, str.
28 See the Commission’s reply to recommendation 2 in Special Report No 18/2015 ‘Financial assistance provided to countries in difficulties’ (http://eca.europa.eu). 
28 Glej odgovor Komisije na priporočilo 2 v Posebnem poročilu št.
Observations 34 45 Further improvement is necessary. 
Opažanja 34 45 Potrebne so nadaljnje izboljšave.
The Commission publishes the relevant external forecast assumptions and other technical assumptions, but implicit country‐specific assumptions are not described and were very hard to infer from the spreadsheets. 
Komisija objavi ustrezne predpostavke zunanjih napovedi in druge tehnične predpostavke, toda implicitne predpostavke za posamezne države niso opisane in jih je tudi zelo težko razbrati iz preglednic.
Furthermore, DG Economic and Financial Affairs consid‐ ers the spreadsheets to be internal documents – not to be shared outside the Commission. 
Poleg tega GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve obravnava preglednice kot notranje dokumente, ki naj se ne bi uporabljali zunaj Komisije.
Shortcomings in the process of examining statistical data still need to be addressed, ... 
Še vedno je treba obravnavati pomanjkljivosti v procesu preučevanja statističnih podatkov ...
46 Eurostat’s examination of statistical data includes verifications carried out either in‐house (data quality assessments) or on‐the‐spot (dialogue visits). 
46 V preučevanje statističnih podatkov Eurostata so vključena preverjanja, ki se izvajajo interno (ocene kakovosti podatkov) ali na kraju samem (obiski za dialog).
These are complemented by guidance provided either bilaterally (at the request of a Mem‐ ber State), or, as a Eurostat initiative, on particularly complex issues. 
Te dopolnjujejo smernice, ki se zagotovijo dvostransko (na zahtevo države članice) ali, za posebno zapletena vprašanja, na pobudo Eurostata.
Data quality assessment 47 Eurostat carries out an extensive analysis of the statistical data received from Member States and their answers to requests for clarification in the three weeks following each of the two annual EDP notifications (see paragraph 10). 
Ocena kakovosti podatkov 47 Eurostat izvaja obsežno analizo statističnih podatkov, ki jih prejme od držav članic, in odgovorov na zahteve za pojasnitev v obdobju treh tednov po vsakem od dveh letnih uradnih obvestil o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem (glej odstavek 10).
Outside this period, Eurostat also carries out in‐house verification of methodological and other data‐related issues, complemented by dialogue visits to Member States. 
Tudi zunaj tega obdobja Eurostat izvaja interno preverjanje metodoloških in drugih vprašanj v zvezi s podatki, ki ga dopolnjuje z obiski za dialog v državah članicah.
At present it can be difficult to see how individual quality assessments were carried out and, therefore, to understand the reasons for the assessment. 
Zdaj včasih ni dobro razviden potek posameznih ocenjevanj kakovosti, zaradi česar je oteženo tudi razumevanje vzrokov za oceno.