natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 26 May, the Commission adopted a Communication (4) proposing a tolerable risk of error level in this range (2 %-5 %). 
Komisija je 26. maja sprejela sporočilo (4), v katerem predlaga raven dopustnega tveganja napake v tem razponu (2 %–5 %).
A DAS error rate around the middle of this range would, in the view of the Commission, be acceptable and justified. 
Stopnja napake DAS okrog sredine tega razpona bi bila po mnenju Komisije sprejemljiva in upravičena.
Beyond this level, additional action would be taken to reduce the error rate through increased controls addressing the major causes of error and taking into account the multi-annual nature of the expenditure. 
Nad to stopnjo pa bi se sprejeli dodatni ukrepi za zmanj­ šanje stopnje napak z okrepljenim nadzorom, namenjenim odpravi glavnih vzrokov za napake ob upoštevanju večletne narave odhodkov.
This rate should cover all Research Framework Programmes. 
Ta stopnja naj bi se uporabljala za vse raziskovalne okvirne programe.
This level could be revised in the light of major changes in the control environment that would have an effect on the DAS error rate, in particular simplification actions taking effect in the next framework programme. 
Mogoče bi jo bilo revidirati v skladu z večjimi spremembami kontrol­ nega okolja, ki bi vplivale na stopnjo napake DAS, zlasti z ukrepi za poenostavitev, ki bodo začeli učinkovati z naslednjim okvirnim programom.
5.46. Based on its audit work, the Court concludes that the supervisory and control systems for policy group Research, Energy and Transport were partially effective in ensuring the regularity of payments. 
5.46 Na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela je prišlo do zaključka, da so bili nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za skupino politik raziskave, energetika in promet pri zagotavljanju pravil­ nosti plačil delno uspešni.
Theseresultsareconsistentwiththoseofprevious years. The main source of error in this policy group remains the reimbursement of overstated personnel and indirect costs to research projects. 
Glavni vir napak na tem področju politik je še vedno povračilo previ­ soko prijavljenih stroškov dela in posrednih stroškov za razi­ skovalne projekte.
5.48. Inthiscontext,theCourtacknowledgedinits2008 Annual Report (10) the reduction in the level of error for this policy group over the last years, due to the reinforcement of the internal control systems and the changes aimed at simplifying the funding rules for research projects. 
5.48 V tem kontekstu je Sodišče v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2008 (10) priznalo, da se je stopnja napak v tej skupini politik v zadnjih letih zmanjšala zaradi okrepitve sistemov notranje kontrole in sprememb, namenjenih poenostavitvi pravil za financiranje raziskovalnih projektov.
The Court notes that this trend has continued in 2009. 
Sodišče opaža, da se je ta trend v letu 2009 nadaljeval.
However, there is a risk that the positive effect of the changes may not continue under FP7, particularly due to difficulties in implementing the ex-ante certification of beneficiaries’ costing methodologies (see paragraphs 5.20 and 5.36). _____________ (10) Paragraph 7.42. 5.48. 
Vendar obstaja tveganje, da se pozitiven učinek sprememb pri sedmem okvirnem programu morda ne bo nadaljeval, zlasti zaradi težav pri izvajanju predhodnega potrjevanja metodologij upra­ vičencev za obračunavanje stroškov (glej odstavka 5.20 in 5.36). _____________ (10) Odstavek 7.42.
The Commission welcomes the positive trend noted by the Court. 
5.48 Komisija je zadovoljna, da je Sodišče ugotovilo pozitiven trend na tem področju.
It underlines that the changes in audit certification requirements have been introduced to simplify and facilitate the participation of the beneficiaries. 
Poudarja, da so bile spremembe zahtev za revizijsko potrjevanje uvedene zaradi poenostavitve in lažjega sodelo­ vanja upravičencev.
Furthermore, whilst recognising the limited success of the ex-ante methodology certification, the full array of internal controls in place, including the FP7 audit strategy, will ensure the right conditions for sound financial management. _____________ (4) COM(2010) 261 final of 26.5.2010. 
Komisija se zaveda, da je metodologija za predhodno potrjevanje le delno uspešna, vendar pa bo celoten sklop vzpostavljenih notranjih kontrol, vključno z revizijsko strategijo za sedmi okvirni program, zagotovil prave pogoje za dobro finančno poslovodenje. _____________ (4) COM(2010) 261 z dne 26. maja 2010.
In the context of the current legal framework, the Commission should: (a) ensure that the independent auditors who have incorrectly certified cost statements are made aware of the eligibility criteria for declared costs; T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 5.49. 
Glede na sedanji pravni okvir bi Komisija morala: (a) poskrbeti, da se neodvisni revizorji, ki so nepravilno potrdili izjave o stroških, seznanijo z merili za upraviče­ nost, ki veljajo za prijavljene stroške; O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 5.49 Glavni cilj Komisije je učinkovito doseči cilj raziskovalne politike, hkrati pa zagotoviti dober nadzor izvrševanja proračuna na tem področju. (a) Komisija vodi politiko aktivnega sporočanja ugotovitev naknadnih revizij upravičencem, da bi, kadar je potrebno, zagotovila izbolj­ šave pri delu revizorjev, ki izdajajo revizijska potrdila.
To this effect every bene­ ficiary is requested in the course of the audit procedure to inform the certifying auditor on material audit findings. 
V ta namen mora vsak upravičenec med revizijskim postopkom obvestiti revi­ zorja o pomembnih ugotovitvah revizije.
The Commission observes, however, that the main cause of the Court’s observations is not so much the design or concept of the audit certificate but rather the relative complexity of the rules, duly referred to by the Court under paragraph 5.16. 
Vendar Komisija opaža, da glavni vzrok za ugotovitve Sodišča ni toliko zasnova ali koncept revizijskega potrdila, ampak prej razmeroma zapletena pravila, na katera se Sodišče ustrezno sklicuje v odstavku 5.16.
This inherent complexity impacts the work performed by the external auditors mandated by beneficiaries to deliver audit certificates. 
Ta notranja zapletenost vpliva na delo, ki ga opravljajo zunanji revizorji, pri katerih upravičenci naročijo revizijska potrdila.
For FP7 it is expected that with the reliance on agreed upon procedures, the degree of errors due to such misinter­ pretation will significantly decrease. (b) The certification on the methodology (CoM) is intended only for beneficiaries of multiple grants. 
Za sedmi okvirni program se pričakuje, da se bo z uporabo dogo­ vorjenih postopkov stopnja napak, ki izvira iz takih napačnih razlag, občutno zmanjšala. (b) Potrjevanje metodologije je predvideno le za upravičence do večkratnih donacij.
The eligibility criteria for the CoM were reviewed in November 2008 and published in the FP7 Guide to Financial Issues. 
Merila za upravičenost za potrjevanje metodo­ logije so bila pregledana novembra 2008 in objavljena v navodilih za finančna vprašanja za sedmi okvirni program.
The Commission recently took action in order to reinforce the attractiveness of the ex-ante certification of beneficiaries costing methodologies. 
Komisija je nedavno začela izvajati ukrepe, da bi povečala pri­ vlačnost predhodnega potrjevanja metodologij, ki jih upravičenci uporabljajo za obračunavanje stroškov.
The Commission expressed its views in this respect in its Communication on simplification of 24 April 2010 as well as in its proposal for triennial revision of the Financial Regulation and its implementing rules adopted on 28 May 2010. 
Komisija je svoja stališča o tem pojasnila v sporočilu o poenostavitvi z dne 24. aprila 2010 ter v svojem predlogu za triletno revizijo finančne uredbe in njenih izvedbenih pravil, sprejetem 28. maja 2010.
Genuine simplification could be yielded by allowing methodologies applied as usual accounting practice as long as they are based on actual personnel costs registered in the accounts. (c) The Commission will further pursue its efforts to improve the timely implementation of audit results and continue to apply its guidelines on the application of liquidated damages. 
Resnično poenostavitev bi lahko dosegli tako, da bi dovolili uporabo metodologij, ki so običajna računovodska praksa, če temeljijo na dejanskih stroških za osebje, zabeleženih v kontih. (c) Komisija si bo še naprej prizadevala izboljšati pravočasno izva­ janje rezultatov revizij ter bo še naprej uporabljala svoje smernice o pogodbeno dogovorjenih odškodninah.
Furthermore the communication on the simplification of the recovery process adopted on 15 December 2009 provides measures to improve the performance of the recovery process. 
Poleg tega sporočilo o poenostavitvi postopka izterjave, sprejeto 15. decembra 2009, predvideva ukrepe za izboljšanje uspešnosti postopka izterjave.
The Commission fully agrees and refers to the orientations developed in its recent Communications on ‘Simplifying the Imple­ mentation of the Research Framework Programmes’ and ‘More or less controls? 
Komisija se popolnoma strinja in se sklicuje na usmeritve, predstavljene v njenih nedavnih sporočilih z naslovoma „O poenosta­ vitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov“ in „Več ali manj kontrol?
Striking the right balance between the administrative costs of control and the risk of error’. (b) review the operation of the system for the certification of beneficiaries’ costing methodologies; (c) reduce the backlog in recovering undue amounts paid, imposing sanctions where necessary. 
Vzpostavitev pravega ravnovesja med upravnimi stroški kontrole in tveganjem napake“. (b) pregledati delovanje sistema za potrjevanje metodologij upravičencev za obračunavanje stroškov; (c) zmanjšati zaostanek pri izterjavi neupravičeno izplačanih zneskov ter izreči sankcije, kjer je potrebno.
The research FPs have developed into complex funding mechanisms, for which the Commission has built up correspondingly weighty management and control systems. 
5.50 Okvirniprogramizaraziskavesoserazvilivzapletene mehanizme financiranja, za katere je Komisija vzpostavila temu ustrezno zapletene upravljavske in kontrolne sisteme.
While proper accountability for the use of EU funds must remain the underlying principle, it is clear that there remains scope for further simplification of the research funding rules. 
Čeprav mora javna odgovornost za porabo sredstev EU ostati temeljno načelo, je jasno, da so še možnosti za nadaljnjo poenostavitev pravil za financiranje raziskav.
EN 130 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 5.51. Therefore, the Court welcomes the Communication issued recently by the Commission(11), putting forward further possibilities for the simplification of research funding rules and procedures, both for FP7 and for future FPs. 
SL 130 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 5.51 Zato Sodišče pozdravlja sporočilo, ki ga je pred kratkim izdala Komisija (11), v katerem so predlagane dodatne možnosti za poenostavitev pravil in postopkov za financiranje raziskav tako za sedmi kot za prihodnje okvirne programe.
The Commission’s Communication should form the basis for discussions with all relevant stakeholders, leading to a compre­ hensive review of the management and control systems for EU research funding. 
Sporočilo Komisije bi moralo biti podlaga za razprave z vsemi relevantnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, ki bi privedle do celovite reforme upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov za finan­ ciranje raziskav s sredstvi EU.
5.52. Simplification and clarification of rules and procedures may not only reduce the scope for error and increase assurance of the regularity of expenditure, but also facilitate the participation of researchers in the FPs and the achievement of EU research policy objectives. 
5.52 Poenostavitev in razjasnitev pravil in postopkov ne bosta samo zmanjšali možnosti napak in povečali zagotovila o pravilnosti odhodkov, ampak tudi olajšali sodelovanje razi­ skovalcev v okvirnih programih in doseganje ciljev razisko­ valne politike EU.
5.55. TheCourtissuedunqualifiedopinionsontherelia­ bility of the accounts and the regularity of the underlying transactions for the Joint Undertakings in the Research, Energy and Transport policy group in 2009 (see paragraphs 5.10 and 5.13). 
5.55 Sodišče je za leto 2009 podalo mnenja brez pridržkov o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravil­ nosti z njimi povezanih transakcij za skupna podjetja v skupini politik raziskave, energetika in promet (glej odstavka 5.10 in 5.13).
While the audit opinions for the Joint Undertakings were unqualified, the Court has emphasised the need for the Joint Undertakings to build up robust and comprehensive internal control systems. 
5.56 Čeprav so bila revizijska mnenja za skupna podjetja brez pridržkov, je Sodišče poudarilo, da morajo vzpostaviti zanesljive in izčrpne sisteme notranje kontrole.
5.57. TheCourthasalsoissuedOpinionsontheFinancial Regulations of the Fusion for Energy and SESAR Joint Under­ takings (12). 
5.57 Sodišče je izdalo tudi mnenji o finančnih uredbah skupnih podjetij „fuzija za energijo“ in SESAR (12).
The Court made several remarks in view of rein­ forcing the financial framework of the Joint Undertakings and ensuring consistency with the general EU Financial Regulation and the framework Financial Regulation for EU bodies. 
Podalo je več pripomb za okrepitev njihovega finančnega okvira ter za zagotavljanje skladnosti s splošno finančno uredbo EU in okvirno finančno uredbo za organe EU.
The Court also pointed out that the financial rules adopted by the Joint Undertakings do not make adequate provision as regards the powers of the Internal Audit Service of the Commission to perform audits of the Joint Undertakings. _____________ (11) COM(2010) 187. 
Sodišče je prav tako opozorilo, da finančna pravila, ki sta jih sprejeli skupni podjetji, ne vsebujejo ustreznih določb o pooblastilih službe Komisije za notranjo revizijo glede revidiranja skupnih podjetij.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 5.51. The full impact of these simplification measures will be felt mainly in the next Framework Programme. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 5.51 Celoten učinek teh ukrepov za poenostavitev se bo pokazal predvsem v naslednjem okvirnem programu.
Until such proposals are implemented, the Commission needs to address the problems caused by complex eligibility rules for grant beneficiaries. 
Do uvedbe teh predlogov se mora Komisija posvetiti težavam, ki jih povzročajo zapletena pravila o upravičenosti do donacij.
On 26 May 2010 the Commission adopted a Communication proposing a tolerable risk of error in this area of between 2 and 5 % (5). 
Komisija je 26. maja 2010 sprejela sporočilo drugim institucijam, v katerem je predlagala, da bi za to področje veljala raven dopustnega tveganja napake med 2 % in 5 % (5).
5.56. The Commission monitors the implementation of the action plans devised by the Joint Undertakings to fully deploy their internal control systems. 
5.56 Komisija spremlja izvajanje akcijskih načrtov, ki so jih pripravila skupna podjetja z namenom, da bi v polni meri izkoristila svoje notranje kontrolne sisteme.
The Commission shares the Court’s opinion that the IAS of the Commission should exercise the same powers over the bodies set up by the EU having a legal personality and receiving contributions from the budget pursuant to Article 185(3) of the general Financial Regulation as those which it exercises over Commission departments. _____________ (5) COM(2010) 261 final. 
5.57 Komisija se strinja z mnenjem Sodišča, da bi morala imeti Komisijina služba za notranjo revizijo enaka pooblastila, kot jih ima za službe Komisije, tudi za organe, ki jih ustanovi EU ter ki so pravne osebe in prejemajo prispevke iz proračuna na podlagi člena 185(3) splošne finančne uredbe.
EN 132 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 ANNEX 5.2 RESULTS OF EXAMINATION OF SYSTEMS FOR RESEARCH, ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Assessment of selected supervisory and control systems System concerned Research Framework Programmes Overall assessment of supervisory and control systems Overall assessment Overall assessment Desk checks before payment Effective Partially effective Not effective Not applicable: does not apply or not assessed 2009 Audit certification 2008 Ex-post financial audits 2007 Implementation of financial corrections Legend N/A 
SL 132 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 PRILOGA 5.2 Ocena izbranih nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov Zadevni sistem Okvirni programi za raziskave Skupna ocena nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov Skupna ocena Skupna ocena REZULTATI PREIZKUŠANJA SISTEMOV ZA RAZISKAVE, ENERGETIKO IN PROMET Dokumentacijski pregledi pred plačilom uspešno delno uspešno neuspešno ni relevantno: se ne uporablja ali ni bilo ocenjeno 2009 Revizijsko potrje­ vanje 2008 Naknadne revizije računovodskih izkazov 2007 Izvajanje finančnih popravkov Legenda NR
The reservation is in line with the Court's findings that the supervisory and control systems for research payments are partially effective and that the expenditure is subject to material error. 
Pridržek se ujema z ugotovitvami Sodišča, da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za plačila za raziskave delno uspešni in da na odhodke vplivajo pomembne napake.
Rate of residual errors with regard to the accuracy of cost claims in the Sixth Research Framework Programme (FP6) The reservation is based on the residual error rate for FP6 cost claims, assessed by DG TREN as above 2 %. The reservation is in line with the Court's findings that the supervisory and control systems for research payments are partially effective and that the expenditure is subject to material error. 
OP, za katero je GD TREN ocenil, da je višja od 2 %. Pridržek se ujema z ugotovitvami Sodišča, da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za plačila za raziskave delno uspešni in da na odhodke vplivajo pomembne napake. (*) Izjava generalnega direktorja o zanesljivosti pomeni, da ima razumno zagotovilo, da vzpostavljeni kontrolni postopki nudijo potrebna jamstva o pravilnosti transakcij.
ANNEX 5.3 RESULTS OF REVIEW OF COMMISSION MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS FOR RESEARCH, ENERGY AND TRANSPORT While the amount at risk in respect of FP7 cost claims is assessed as not material in 2009 and therefore no reservation is made, DG RTD draws attention in its Annual Activity Report to the likelihood of material error affecting FP7 cost claims from 2010. 
C: Izjava generalnega direktorja in letno poročilo o dejavnostih ne vsebujeta poštene ocene finančnega poslovodenja, kar zadeva pravilnost. PRILOGA 5.3 REZULTATI PREGLEDA POSLOVODSKIH PREDSTAVITEV KOMISIJE ZA RAZISKAVE, ENERGETIKO IN PROMET GD INFSO je za leto 2009 ocenil, da tveganje pri znesku, povezanem z zahtevki za povračilo stroškov za 7.
EN 134 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 Court observation Action taken 1. 
SL 134 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 Opažanja Sodišča Sprejeti ukrepi 1.
Statements of Assurance 2007 and 2008: a material level of error in payments Court analysis Commission reply In 2007 and 2008, the Court detected substantive errors in 83 of the transactions audited. 
Izjava o zanesljivosti za leti 2007 in 2008: pomembna stopnja napak v plačilih Analiza Sodišča Odgovor Komisije Leta 2007 in 2008 je Sodišče našlo vsebinske napake v 83 revidiranih transakcijah.
The main types of error were: overstatement of eligible personnel and indirect costs; declaration of other ineligible costs; inad­ equate supporting evidence to justify costs claimed; declaration of budgeted amounts rather than actual costs; and declaration of costs not attributable to the project. 
Glavne vrste napak so bile: prijavljanje previsokih upravičenih stroškov dela in posrednih stroškov, prijavljanje drugih neupravičenih stroškov, neustrezna dokazila za utemeljitev prijavljenih stroškov, prijavljanje zneskov, ki so bili predvideni v proračunu, namesto dejanskih stroškov in prijavljanje stroškov, ki niso nastali pri projektu.
In 12 cases, the Commission has concluded that no specific corrective action is necessary to remedy the errors identified by the Court. 
V 12 primerih je Komisija prišla do zaključka, da niso potrebni nobeni posebni popravni ukrepi za odpravo napak, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče.
Although in five cases there have been significant delays in implementing corrective action, the Commission has generally taken appropriate measures in due time in order to follow up the Court's observations. 
Čeprav je v petih primerih prišlo do precejšnjih zamud pri izvajanju popravnih ukrepov, je Komisija na splošno pravočasno ustrezno ukre­ pala na podlagi opažanj Sodišča.
(2007 Annual Report, paragraphs 7.14 to 7.15; 2008 Annual Report, paragraphs 7.11 to 7.15) In 14 cases, the Commission has initiated corrective action which remains to be completed. 
(Letno poročilo za leto 2007, odstavka 7.14 in 7.15; letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavki 7.11 do 7.15.) še niso končani. V enem primeru popravni ukrepi še niso spro­ 2.
Late payments by the Commission The Commission has incurred undue delays in making The Commission has improved the monitoring of delays, adapted its IT tools and streamlined procedures. 
Pozna plačila Komisije Komisija je neupravičeno zamujala pri izplačevanju plačil Komisija je izboljšala spremljanje zamud, prila­ godila svoja informacijska orodja in racionalizi­ rala postopke.
Administrative management of payments has increasingly been delegated to the research Executive Agencies. 
Administrativno upravljanje plačil je v vse večji meri prenesla na izvajalski agenciji za raziskave.
The Commission has maintained the improved performance which was noted in 2008. 
Komisija je ohranila večjo uspešnost, ki je bila opažena v letu 2008.
While there were significant improvements regarding payments to experts, further efforts are required to reduce payment delays for research grants, for which 30 % of payments were late in 2009. 
Medtem ko se je stanje v zvezi s plačili strokovnjakom precej izboljšalo, pa so potrebna dodatna prizadevanja za zmanj­ šanje zamud pri izplačevanju sredstev za razi­ skave, kjer je bilo v letu 2009 30 % plačil izplačanih z zamudo.
The Commission welcomes the recognition by the Court of the progress made so far. 
Komisija je zadovoljna, da je Sodišče opazilo doslej doseženi napredek.
The Commission is committed to pursuing these efforts to further improve its performance. payments to beneficiaries, although in 2008 the Court observed that the Commission made considerable progress in reducing the delays in payments. 
Še naprej je odločena nadaljevati prizadevanja za nadaljnje izboljšanje izvajanja na tem področju. upravičencem, čeprav je Sodišče v letu 2008 opazilo, da je dosegla precejšen napredek pri zmanjševanju zamud pri plačilih.
In 2007, the Court found late payments in 30 out of 180 cases audited (i.e. 17 %). 
Za leto 2007 je Sodišče pozna plačila našlo v 30 od 180 revidiranih primerov (tj. 17 %).
In 2008, the Court found fewer late payments: 12 cases out of 150 payments audited (i.e. 8 %). 
Za leto 2008 je Sodišče našlo manj poznih plačil: 12 primerov od 150 revidiranih plačil (tj. 8 %).
In 2009, the Court found late payments in 10 out of 150 payments audited (i.e. 7 %). 
Za leto 2009 je Sodišče našlo pozna plačila v 10 od 150 revidiranih primerov (tj. 7 %).
(2007 Annual Report, Annex 7.2; 2008 Annual Report, paragraph 7.16) In 56 cases, the Commission has made financial corrections. 
(Letno poročilo za leto 2007, Priloga 7.2, in letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavek 7.16.) V 56 primerih je izvedla finančne popravke.
ANNEX 5.4 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS FOR RESEARCH, ENERGY AND TRANSPORT 
PRILOGA 5.4 NADALJNJE UKREPANJE PO PREJŠNJIH OPAŽANJIH ZA RAZISKAVE, ENERGETIKO IN PROMET