natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Principles developed by international actors for tracking climate financing The ‘Common Principles for Climate Mitigation Finance Tracking’, developed by the joint climate finance group of Multilateral Development Banks24 and the International Development Finance Club, include the principle of conservativeness, which dictates that ‘where data is unavailable, any uncertainty is to be overcome following the principle of conservativeness where under-reported rather than over-reported climate finance is preferable’. 
Načela, ki so jih oblikovali mednarodni akterji za spremljanje financiranja podnebnih ukrepov Skupna načela za spremljanje financiranja blažitve podnebnih sprememb, ki jih je oblikovala skupna skupina za financiranje podnebnih ukrepov multilateralnih razvojnih bank24 in mednarodnega kluba za razvojno financiranje, vključujejo načelo konzervativnosti. V primeru nerazpoložljivosti podatkov je treba vsako negotovost odpraviti po načelu konzervativnosti, v skladu s katerim je bolje poročati o prenizkih zneskih financiranja podnebnih ukrepov kot o previsokih.
The EIB has incorporated this principle within its general principles for recording its climate action lending: ‘Credibility: the recording system must maintain the credibility of the Bank’s reporting on climate action, and thus, in the case of doubt or uncertainty around climate impacts, the presumption will be to exclude.’ 
EIB je to načelo vključila v splošna načela za beleženje svojih posojil za podnebne ukrepe: Verodostojnost: sistem beleženja mora ohranjati verodostojnost poročanja banke o podnebnih ukrepih, zato je v primeru dvoma ali negotovosti glede podnebnih vplivov treba izključiti domneve.
The EIB’s other general principles include that, as far as possible only the climate relevant parts of projects and programmes should be recorded, and that mitigation and adaptation are to be recorded separately. 
Eno od splošnih načel EIB je tudi to, da je treba, kolikor je to mogoče, evidentirati le tiste dele projektov in programov, ki so pomembni za podnebje, blažitev in prilagajanje pa je treba evidentirati ločeno.
24 The African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the European Investment Bank, the Inter American Development Bank, and the International Finance Corporation, World Bank from the World Bank Group. 
24 Afriška razvojna banka, Azijska razvojna banka, Evropska banka za obnovo in razvoj, Evropska investicijska banka, Medameriška razvojna banka in Mednarodna finančna korporacija, Svetovna banka iz Skupine Svetovne banke.
Source: Common Principles for Climate Mitigation Finance Tracking, 31 March 2015. 
Vir: Common Principles for Climate Mitigation Finance Tracking (Splošna načela za spremljanje financiranja blažitve podnebnih sprememb), 31. marec 2015.
European Investment Bank, EIB Climate Strategy, Mobilising finance for the transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy, 22 September 2015. 
Evropska investicijska banka, EIB Climate Strategy, Mobilising finance for the transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy (Podnebna strategija EIB – Zagotovitev finančnih sredstev za prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo, odporno na podnebne spremembe), 22. september 2015.
Observations 25 37 In 2014 the Commission proposed at least doubling expenditure via financial instruments under the European Structural and Investment Funds for the programming period from 2014 to 202025. 
Opažanja 25 37 Komisija je leta 2014 predlagala, da se odhodki iz finančnih instrumentov v okviru evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 vsaj podvojijo25.
Approximatively 21 billion euros will be allocated to financial instruments from these funds26. 
Približno 21 milijard EUR bo dodeljenih finančnim instrumentom iz teh skladov26.
Such financial instruments aim to revolve and to have a multiplier effect generating additional investments. 
Cilj teh instrumentov je, da se obnavljajo in imajo multiplikacijski učinek, ki ustvarja dodatne naložbe.
For example, the EU contribution of 10 million euros in 2016 to the Natural Capital Finance Facility27 is included in the climate tracking exercise. 
V spremljanje podnebnih ukrepov je na primer vključen prispevek EU v višini 10 milijonov EUR iz leta 2016 za finančni mehanizem za naravni kapital27.
This facility’s actual contribution could be 10 times as high28. 
Dejanski prispevek tega mehanizma bi bil lahko desetkrat višji28.
Tracking progress towards the 20 % in the EU core budget does not reflect the full financial effects of EU spending on climate action. 
Spremljanje napredka pri doseganju 20-odstotnega cilja v osrednjem proračunu EU ne odraža v celoti finančnih učinkov porabe sredstev EU za podnebne ukrepe.
38 At the same time, we found a potential overestimate of the Natural Capital Finance Facility’s contribution to climate action. This is because it can also invest in fields which do not have climate expenditure as either a principal or significant objective. 
38 Sodišče je hkrati ugotovilo morebitno previsoko oceno prispevka finančnega mehanizma za naravni kapital k podnebnim ukrepom, saj lahko ta instrument vlaga tudi v področja, pri katerih odhodki za podnebne ukrepe niso ne glavni ne bistven cilj.
Overall progress made towards reaching the target, but reporting only partially reliable and not focused enough on results 39 The system used to monitor progress towards the 20 % target is incorporated in the Commission’s annual budgetary procedure. 
Splošen napredek pri doseganju cilja, vendar je poročanje le delno zanesljivo in ne dovolj usmerjeno v rezultate 39 Sistem za spremljanje napredka pri doseganju 20-odstotnega cilja je vključen v letni proračunski postopek Komisije.
Each directorate-general determines the level of tracking detail required and reports the aggregates to Directorate-General Budget. Both Directorate-General Budget and Directorate-General Climate Action monitor progress on an annual basis. 
Vsak generalni direktorat določi, kako podrobno mora biti spremljanje, in skupne zneske sporoči Generalnemu direktoratu za proračun. Generalni direktorat za proračun in Generalni direktorat za podnebno politiko spremljata napredek na letni ravni.
40 On average, the climate contribution rate has stood at 17.6 % between 2014 and 2016. 
40 Med letoma 2014 in 2016 je bila povprečna stopnja prispevka k podnebnim ukrepom 17,6 %.
The Commission working document accompanying the mid-term review of the multiannual financial framework29 suggests that progress has been made between these years (see Figure 6), since the total EU budget contribution to climate funding was estimated by the Commission to be 13.6 % in 2014, 17.3 % in 2015 and 20.9 % in 2016. 
V delovnem dokumentu Komisije, priloženem vmesnemu pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira EU29, je navedeno, da je bil v teh letih dosežen napredek (glej sliko 6), saj je skupni prispevek iz proračuna EU za financiranje za podnebne cilje po ocenah Komisije leta 2014 znašal 13,6 %, leta 2015 17,3 %, leta 2016 pa 20,9 %.
For 2017, the Commission estimates — based on its draft budget proposal — the climate funding to be 19.3 %. 
Komisija na podlagi svojega osnutka predloga proračuna ocenjuje, da bo leta 2017 financiranje za podnebne cilje znašalo 19,3 %.
25 COM(2014) 903 final of 26 November 2014, ‘An investment Plan for Europe’, pp.7, 10 and 11. 
25 COM(2014) 903 final z dne 26. novembra 2014, Naložbeni načrt za Evropo, str. 7, 10 in 11.
26 Commission estimate as at the end of 2015, see Special Report No 19/2016 ‘Implementing the EU budget through financial instruments — lessons to be learnt from the 2007-2013 programme period’, paragraph 21 (http://eca. europa.eu). 
26 Ocena Komisije ob koncu leta 2015, glej odstavek 21 Posebnega poročila št. 19/2016 – Izvrševanje proračuna EU s finančnimi instrumenti – izkušnje, pridobljene v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 (http:// eca.europa.eu).
27 Developed by the European Investment Bank and the Commission, this financial instrument, which is part of the LIFE programme, seeks to use public funds to leverage private investment in natural capital activities. 
27 Namen tega finančnega instrumenta, ki sta ga vzpostavili Evropska investicijska banka in Komisija ter je del programa LIFE, je uporabljati javna sredstva za spodbujanje zasebnih naložb v dejavnosti v zvezi z naravnim kapitalom.
28 The Natural Capital Finance Facility is expected to provide finance of 100 to 125 million euros between 2015 and 2017. 
28 Finančni mehanizem za naravni kapital naj bi med letoma 2015 in 2017 zagotovil finančna sredstva v višini od 100 do 125 milijonov EUR.
29 SWD(2016) 299 of 14 September 2016 accompanying the mid-term review of the multiannual financial framework COM(2016) 603 final. 
29 SWD(2016) 299 z dne 14. septembra 2016, priložen vmesnemu pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira COM(2016) 603 final.
Observations 26 Overview of climate-related spending plans for 2014 to 2016 25 20 15 10 5 0 20.9 % Target 20 % 13.6 % 17.3 % 17.6 % 2014 2015 2016 Average 2014-2016 Source: Commission data, mid-term review of the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020, SWD(2016) 299 final. 
Opažanja 26 Pregled načrtov porabe sredstev za podnebne cilje za obdobje 2014–2016 25 20 15 10 5 0 20,9 % Cilj 20 % 13,6 % 17,3 % 17,6 % 2014 2015 2016 Povprečje 2014–2016 Vir: podatki Komisije, vmesni pregled večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2014–2020, SWD(2016) 299 final.
41 The Commission acknowledged in a 2015 annual activity report that it was not in a position to assess with confidence whether it was on track to reach the 20 % objective for the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework period overall30. 
41 Komisija je v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2015 potrdila, da ne more zanesljivo oceniti, ali bo 20-odstotni cilj za večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2014– 202030 dosežen.
The Commission assessed progress towards the 20 % target in the multiannual financial framework mid-term review, published on 14 September 2016. 
Napredek pri doseganju 20-odstotnega cilja je ocenila v vmesnemu pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira, ki je bil objavljen 14. septembra 2016.
It estimated that 18.9 % of the EU budget would be spent on climate action. 
Ocenjuje se, da bo za podnebne ukrepe porabljenih 18,9 % proračuna EU.
We found that the figures for 2014 and 2015 were largely based on estimates. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da podatki za leti 2014 in 2015 večinoma temeljijo na ocenah.
This was particularly the case with the European Structural and Investment Funds. 
To še posebej velja za evropske strukturne in investicijske sklade.
30 See the Directorate-General for Climate Action’s Annual Activity Report for 2015, p. 
30 Glej letno poročilo o dejavnostih Generalnega direktorata za podnebno politiko za leto 2015, str.
Share of climate funding in EU budget Figure 6 
Delež finančnih sredstev za podnebne cilje v proračunu EU Slika 6
Observations 27 42 While this was unavoidable, since the spending instruments for the new programming period had only just been set up, and so some information was not yet available, these limitations hampered the comparability from one year to the other of the data provided for the period 2014-2016 (see Figure 6). 
Opažanja 27 42 Čeprav je bilo to neizogibno, saj so bili instrumenti za porabo sredstev za novo programsko obdobje ravno vzpostavljeni in nekatere informacije še niso bile na voljo, so omejitve ovirale primerljivost podatkov, zagotovljenih za obdobje 2014–2016, med različnimi leti (glej sliko 6).
In addition, the approval of the multiannual spending programmes in 2015 automatically contributed to the increase in climate action funding since as programmes were approved their climate-related plans were entered into the system. 
Poleg tega se je zaradi odobritve večletnih programov za porabo sredstev leta 2015 samodejno povečalo financiranje podnebnih ukrepov, saj so bili ob odobritvi programov njihovi načrti za podnebne ukrepe vključeni v sistem.
As a result, the evolution between 2014 and 2016 cannot be taken as a trend for the whole period. 
Zato se razvoj med letoma 2014 in 2016 ne more razumeti kot trend za celotno obdobje.
43 In the fisheries spending area, Member States do not have to report their planned climate measures to the Commission until 2016. 
43 Na področju porabe sredstev za ribištvo države članice do leta 2016 Komisiji niso poročale o svojih načrtovanih podnebnih ukrepih.
Until they do so, Directorate-General Maritime Affairs and Fisheries cannot verify the accuracy of the indicative contribution to climate change action objectives communicated by the Member States in their operational programmes. 
Dokler tega ne storijo, Generalni direktorat za pomorske zadeve in ribištvo ne more preveriti točnosti okvirnega prispevka k ciljem podnebnih ukrepov, ki so jih države članice sporočile v svojih operativnih programih.
44 To date, no tool has been available to provide a multiannual consolidated update on the situation across the EU budget. 
44 Do zdaj ni bilo orodja za zagotovitev posodobljenih večletnih konsolidiranih informacij o stanju celotnega proračuna EU.
The Commission has recently updated climate-relevant spending data for the whole financial period in the context of the multiannual financial framework mid-term review. 
Komisija je nedavno posodobila podatke o porabi sredstev za podnebne cilje za celotno finančno obdobje pri vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira.
45 The established approach presents an inherent risk, since it focuses on identifying the plans for future expenditure. Planned expenditure on climate action does not, however, necessarily translate into actual spending. 
45 Ta pristop je tvegan, saj se osredotoča na ugotavljanje načrtov za odhodke v prihodnosti, načrtovani odhodki za podnebne ukrepe pa ne ustrezajo vedno dejanski porabi.
While this audit did not look at actual expenditure, and, in general, data on actual expenditure is not yet available, we found instances which highlighted this inherent risk. 
Čeprav se med to revizijo dejanski odhodki niso preučevali in podatki o njih na splošno še niso na voljo, je Sodišče odkrilo primere, v katerih se je to tveganje pokazalo.
When comparing actual expenditure at project level against plans in the LIFE programme, we found that the LIFE projects chosen represented an EU climate action contribution of 34 % of the total EU funds allocated to LIFE. 
Sodišče je ob primerjavi dejanskih odhodkov na ravni projektov z načrti v programu LIFE ugotovilo, da so izbrani projekti programa LIFE k podnebnim ukrepom EU prispevali 34 % vseh sredstev EU, dodeljenih temu programu.
This fell short of the 49.3 % anticipated in the budgetary documents. 
To je manj kot 49,3 %, kot je bilo predvideno v proračunskih dokumentih.
Observations 28 46 This case illustrates the need for the authorities to re-evaluate any projected climate funding contributions once they are sufficiently certain of the nature of their forthcoming expenditure, while avoiding extra administrative costs. 
Opažanja 28 46 Ta primer kaže, da bi morali pristojni organi, potem ko bi bila gotovost glede narave prihodnjih odhodkov zadostna, ponovno oceniti vse predvidene prispevke za financiranje za podnebne cilje, pri tem pa preprečiti dodatne upravne stroške.
The Commission has not yet developed a procedure for doing so. 
Komisija še ni pripravila postopka za to.
47 In addition, the Commission’s approach to the 20 % target is solely focused on financial data. 
47 Poleg tega se Komisija pri svojem pristopu k doseganju 20-odstotnega cilja osredotoča zgolj na finančne podatke.
Information on what funds plan to achieve or have achieved in terms of results such as greenhouse gas reductions is only available for parts of the budget. 
Informacije o tem, kaj skladi nameravajo doseči oziroma kaj so že dosegli na področju rezultatov, kot je zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, so na voljo le za nekatere dele proračuna.
The information is also not comparable, which hampers the consolidation of the results achieved in different areas. 
Te informacije tudi niso primerljive, kar ovira konsolidacijo rezultatov, doseženih na različnih področjih.
48 In the European Regional Development Fund, Member States are not obliged to use the common greenhouse gas reduction output indicator apart from in the energy investments. 
48 Pri Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj države članice niso zavezane k uporabi skupnega kazalnika glede rezultatov zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov, razen pri energetskih naložbah.
While Member States may opt to include other areas, we found that not all of the audited Member States did so. 
Države članice se sicer lahko odločijo za vključitev drugih področij, a je Sodišče ugotovilo, da tega niso storile vse revidirane države članice.
In addition, different methodologies and tools31 are used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and reductions. 
Poleg tega se za izračun emisij toplogrednih plinov in njihovega zmanjšanja uporabljajo različne metodologije in orodja31.
Several Member State authorities are developing tools to calculate emissions for certain project types such as climate-friendly transportation in the European Regional Development Fund. 
Več organov držav članic razvija orodja za izračun emisij pri nekaterih vrstah projektov, kot je podnebju prijazen prevoz v okviru Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj.
As a result, there is a lack of information about the extent to which climate-related action will contribute to the CO2 emission reductions, and the available data may not be comparable across Member States. 
Zato ni dovolj informacij o tem, koliko bodo ukrepi v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami prispevali k zmanjšanju emisij CO2, razpoložljivi podatki pa morda ne bodo primerljivi med državami članicami.
We found that where indicators existed, they focused on mitigation within the energy sector, while adaptation related indicators are rare. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se kazalniki, če obstajajo, osredotočajo na blažitev v energetskem sektorju, kazalniki za prilagajanje pa so redki.
31 For instance, the Commission has referred to its experience with some tools within the budget (e.g. CO2MPARE), and to approaches used at the EIB, the World Bank and other IFIs, and by private investors (e.g. SEI metrics, IIGCC). 
31 Komisija se je na primer sklicevala na svoje izkušnje z nekaterimi orodji znotraj proračuna (npr. CO2MPARE) in na pristope, ki jih uporabljajo EIB, Svetovna banka in druge mednarodne finančne institucije ter zasebni vlagatelji (npr. metoda merjenja naložb v trajnostne vire energije, IIGCC (skupina institucionalnih vlagateljev na področju podnebnih sprememb)).
Observations 29 There is a serious risk that the target will not be met 49 We estimated that the rate of climate funding must be increased to an average of 22 % across the remaining years of the current multiannual financial framework, i.e. for 2017 to 2020, to reach the overall target of 20 % by the end of 2020. 
Opažanja 29 Obstaja resno tveganje, da cilj ne bo dosežen 49 Sodišče je ocenilo, da je treba stopnjo financiranja za podnebne cilje v preostalih letih sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira, tj. od leta 2017 do leta 2020, povečati na povprečno 22 %, da bi do leta 2020 dosegli skupni cilj 20 %.
This matches the estimate produced by the Directorate-General for Climate Action32. 
To se ujema z oceno Generalnega direktorata za podnebno politiko32.
Compared to 2014-2016, this means that an increased effort will be required for 2017-2020. 
V primerjavi z obdobjem 2014–2016 bo torej treba v obdobju 2017–2020 povečati prizadevanja.
However, the mid-term review estimates an 18.9 % spending on climate action for the period of 2014-2020. 
Vendar pa je bila v vmesnem pregledu poraba za podnebne ukrepe v obdobju 2014–2020 ocenjena na 18,9 %.
50 We also conducted an analysis in order to assess the Commission’s prognosis. 
50 Sodišče je opravilo tudi analizo, da bi ocenilo napoved Komisije.
Assuming that the areas responsible for most climate funding (see Table 1) actually provide the anticipated amounts of climate funding, we estimated that the rate of climate funding to be achieved in 2014-2020 in the areas of the EU budget not listed in Table 133 was 18.2 %. 
Ob predpostavki, da bodo področja, s katerih naj bi prišla večina financiranja za podnebne cilje (glej tabelo 1) dejansko zagotovila predvidene zneske financiranja za podnebne cilje, je ocenilo, da je treba v obdobju 2014–2020 na področjih proračuna EU, ki niso našteta v tabeli 133, doseči 18,2-odstotno stopnjo financiranja podnebnih ukrepov.
This would mean doubling current efforts in these areas34. 
To bi pomenilo, da je treba sedanja prizadevanja na teh področjih pod-vojiti34.
We could find no evidence showing that the Commission was increasing efforts in these areas and how such a doubling would be feasible. 
Sodišče ni našlo dokazov, da bi Komisija povečevala prizadevanja na teh področjih, niti informacij o tem, kako bi bilo mogoče prizadevanja podvojiti.
51 In addition, there are serious risks that could affect the expected contribution in the areas mentioned in Table 1, which are to provide most of the planned climate funding on 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework. 
51 Poleg tega obstajajo resna tveganja, ki bi lahko vplivala na predvideni prispevek na področjih, omenjenih v tabeli 1, ki naj bi zagotovila večino načrtovanih finančnih sredstev za podnebne cilje v večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2014–2020.
The main risks are examined sector by sector in the three following sections: — Assumptions concerning the largest contribution from agricultural direct payments to the climate action target are insufficiently justified and this may lead to overestimation (paragraphs 52 to 54). — Application of EU climate coefficients has led to overestimation of the contribution to climate of rural development (paragraphs 55 to 59). — We adapted the climate contributions from agricultural direct payments and rural development measures where necessary to be in line with the principle of conservativeness (see paragraphs 54 and 58). 
Glavna tveganja so predstavljena po posameznih sektorjih v naslednjih treh oddelkih: – predpostavke v zvezi z največjim prispevkom neposrednih kmetijskih plačil k doseganju cilja v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi niso dovolj utemeljene, zato so ocene lahko previsoke (odstavki 52 do 54). – zaradi uporabe podnebnih koeficientov EU je prišlo do precenjevanja prispevka razvoja podeželja k podnebnim ukrepom (odstavki 55 do 59); – Sodišče je prispevke k podnebnim ukrepom iz neposrednih kmetijskih plačil in ukrepov za razvoj podeželja po potrebi prilagodilo, da so skladni z načelom konzervativnosti (glej odstavka 54 in 58).
These adjustments would reduce agricultural climate funding by up to approximately 33 billion euros, which represents around 15 % of the overall target. — Horizon 2020 has fallen behind its 35 % target and needs to catch up (paragraphs 60 to 64). 
S temi prilagoditvami bi se kmetijsko financiranje za podnebne cilje zmanjšalo za približno 33 milijard EUR, kar pomeni približno 15 % skupnega cilja, – program Obzorje 2020 je v zaostanku za svojim 35-odstotnim ciljem, ki ga bo treba nadoknaditi (odstavki 60 do 64).
32 See graph in the Directorate-General for Climate Action’s Annual Activity Report for 2015, p. 
32 Glej graf v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih Generalnega direktorata za podnebno politiko za leto 2015, str.
33 They are mainly research programmes (excluding Horizon 2020) and the spending programmes under budget headings dealing with security and citizenship, and external relationships of the EU. 
33 Gre predvsem za raziskovalne programe (razen programa Obzorje 2020) in programe za porabo sredstev iz proračunskih postavk v zvezi z varnostjo in državljanstvom ter zunanjimi odnosi EU.
34 On the basis of the rate of 11.4 % expected to be achieved for the years 2014-2016, we estimated that a rate of 23.2 % would need to be achieved on average for the remaining years 2017-2020 if the overall target of 20 % was to be reached. 
34 Sodišče je na podlagi 11,4-odstotne stopnje, ki naj bi bila predvidoma dosežena v obdobju 2014–2016, ocenilo, da bi morali v preostalih letih od leta 2017 do leta 2020 v povprečju doseči 23,2-odstotno stopnjo, da bi dosegli skupni cilj 20 %.