natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Only 1% of farms in Spain have income close to or above 400 000 euro (expressed in FNVA), an indicator that has been rather stable over time. 
Le 1 % kmetij v Španiji se je približal 400 000 EUR (izraženo v neto dodani vrednosti kmetije) ali jih presegel, ta kazalnik pa je že nekaj časa nespremenjen.
Only 0.5% of the total farms in this region had income between 500 000 and 750 000 Euro (2010 data). 
Le 0,5 % vseh kmetij v tej regiji je imelo dohodek med 500 000 in 750 000 EUR (podatki iz leta 2010).
Cases of payment provided where the young farmers have a minor role are considered as non-compliant with the regulation by the Commission. 
Po mnenju Komisije primeri, v katerih so se plačila zagotovila, čeprav imajo mladi kmetje manjšo vlogo, niso skladna s predpisi.
The notion of joint control was introduced by the legislators to take into consideration the fact that young farmers often start by working together with non-young farmers. 
Pojem skupnega nadzora so zakonodajalci uvedli zaradi upoštevanja dejstva, da mladi kmetje pogosto začenjajo tako, da delajo skupaj s kmeti, ki ne spadajo v kategorijo mladih kmetov.
In the EU there are many holdings with associated young and non-young farmers, and this is why the rules prescribe that the top-up payment to young farmers is only granted where the young farmers exercise at least a "joint control". 
V EU so številna kmetijska gospodarstva s povezanimi mladimi kmeti in kmeti, ki ne spadajo v kategorijo mladih kmetov, zato pravila določajo, da se dodatno plačilo za mlade kmete dodeli le, če mladi kmeti izvajajo vsaj „skupni nadzor“.
Where young farmers have a minor role in these holdings, they are simply not eligible for the young farmer payment as the young farmer does not have effective control. 7 
Če imajo mladi kmetje v teh kmetijskih gospodarstvih le manjšo vlogo, te enostavno niso upravičene do plačil za mlade kmete, saj mladi kmet nima učinkovitega nadzora. 7
The Commission has provided Member States (and the European Court of Auditors) with interpretation in the form of letters1 and explanations during an expert workshop2 of the notion of joint control in the context of young farmers who are legal persons. 
Komisija je državam članicam (in Evropskemu računskemu sodišču) predložila razlago v obliki dopisov1, na strokovni delavnici2 pa pojasnila pojma skupnega nadzora v primeru mladih kmetov, ki so pravne osebe.
To exercise effective and long-term control, a young farmer has to meet three cumulative conditions, namely to have a share of the capital, to be able to take part in the decision making process regarding the running (also financially) of the legal person and to be capable of exercising daily management of the legal person. 
Da bi mladi kmet izvajal učinkovit in dolgotrajni nadzor, mora izpolnjevati tri kumulativne pogoje, tj. imeti mora delež kapitala, imeti mora možnost sodelovanja v postopku odločanja glede vodenja (tudi finančnega) pravne osebe in mora biti sposoben vsakodnevno upravljati pravno osebo.
Member States need to implement the notion of effective and long-term control taking into account both their national law on companies and the individual circumstances of the case at stake (articles of association, etc.). 
Države članice morajo pojem učinkovitega in dolgotrajnega nadzora izvajati ob upoštevanju njihove nacionalne zakonodaje o družbah in posameznih okoliščin zadevnega primera (statut itd.).
This interpretation is incorporated in the relevant audit procedures of DG AGRI. 
Ta razlaga je vključena v ustrezne revizijske postopke GD AGRI.
The definition of farmer and the active farmer provision are applicable at the level of the beneficiary (i.e. the legal person). 
Opredelitev pojma kmet in določba v zvezi z aktivnostjo kmetov se uporabljata na ravni upravičenca (tj. pravne osebe).
Box 3 – Example of holding receiving the payment for young farmers despite the young person having only a minor role in the holding Italy (Emilia-Romagna) The Commission does not dispute that the Court has witnessed such a case. 
Okvir 3 – Primer kmetijskega gospodarstva, ki je prejelo plačilo za mlade kmete, čeprav je imela mlada oseba v njem le manjšo vlogo Italija (Emilija-Romanja) Komisija ne oporeka, da je Sodišče ugotovilo tak primer.
However, such cases point to problems of poor implementation (including controls) despite the interpretation provided on the notion of joint control. 
Vendar taki primeri kažejo na težave zaradi slabega izvajanja (vključno z nadzorom) kljub razlagi pojma skupnega nadzora.
As regards proportionality, it is reminded that the legal framework does not envisage the payment being proportional to the role of the young farmer. 
Kar zadeva sorazmernost, je treba opozoriti, da pravni okvir ne predvideva sorazmernosti plačila vlogi mladega kmeta.
But the young person must control (solely or jointly) the legal person. 
Vendar mora mlada oseba (sama ali skupaj) nadzorovati pravno osebo.
The Commission does not dispute that the Court has witnessed such a case. 
Komisija ne oporeka, da je Sodišče ugotovilo tak primer.
Being a shareholder is not a sufficient condition for establishing joint control (see Commission's reply to paragraph 43). 
Če je oseba delničar, to ni zadosten pogoj za vzpostavitev skupnega nadzora (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 43).
Where payment is provided to farmers who are not involved in the daily management of the holding, the definition of a young farmer according to Article 50(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 is not respected. 
Če se plačilo zagotovi kmetom, ki niso vključeni v vsakodnevno upravljanje kmetijskega gospodarstva, se ne upošteva opredelitev mladega kmeta v skladu s členom 50(2) Uredbe (EU) št.
Payment for young farmers is available only to those farmers of young age who are set-up as a head of the holding. 
1307/2013. Plačila za mlade kmete so na voljo le tistim mladim kmetom, ki so določeni kot nosilci kmetijskega gospodarstva.
Non-compliances detected by the Commission are to be examined under the clearance of accounts. 
Neskladnosti, ki jih je odkrila Komisija, je treba preučiti v okviru potrditve obračunov.
As regards legal title to use land the following is to be noted: considering Case law (C-61/09, C-375/08), Member States cannot insist on a very specific legal title for the land. 
Kar zadeva pravice do uporabe zemljišč, je treba opozoriti na naslednje: glede na sodno prakso (C-61/09, C-375/08) države članice ne morejo vztrajati pri zelo posebni pravici do zemljišč.
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 provides that land has to be at farmer's "disposal" on a date fixed by a Member State (linked to the latest date for submitting application for direct payments) and such availability may 1 2 Letters to DK (Ares(2015)162942 of 15/01/2015), NL (Ares(2015)1173220 - 17/03/2015), EE (Ares(2016)6004433 - 19/10/2016) which have been made available in due time for consultation by Member State authorities via CircaBC. 
1307/2013 določa, da mora biti zemljišče kmetu „na voljo“ na datum, ki ga določi država članica (in je povezan z najpoznejšim rokom za predložitev vloge za neposredna plačila), taka razpoložljivost pa lahko temelji na kateri koli vrsti pogodbe (npr. civilno pravo v nekaterih državah članicah omogoča tudi ustno pogodbo) na podlagi zakupa, prodaje ali katere koli druge pravne oznake. 1 2 Dopisi Danski (Ares(2015)162942 z dne 15. januarja 2015), Nizozemski (Ares(2015)1173220 z dne 17. marca 2015) in Estoniji (Ares(2016)6004433 z dne 19. oktobra 2016), vpogled v katere se je organom držav članic pravočasno omogočil prek spletne storitve CircaBC.
Expert workshop "Payment for Young Farmers – exchange of Member States' experiences of implementation and control" organised on 23 September 2015 (documentation available to Member States in CircaBC). 8 
Strokovna delavnica „Plačila za mlade kmete – izmenjava izkušenj držav članic o izvajanju in nadzoru“, ki je bila organizirana 23. septembra 2015 (dokumentacija je državam članicam na voljo v spletni storitvi CircaBC). 8
In cases of doubt Member States have all rights to require more information from farmers regarding their legal title to use the land. 
Države članice imajo v primeru dvoma vso pravico, da od kmetov zahtevajo dodatne informacije glede njihove pravice do uporabe zemljišč.
These ratios reflect only the young farmer top-up, not the actual income support provided to newly set-up young farmers under Pillar 1 (see Commission's reply to paragraph 6). 
Ti deleži izražajo le dodatek za mladega kmeta in ne dejanske dohodkovne podpore, ki se novoustanovljenim mladim kmetom zagotovi v okviru 1. stebra (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 6).
This observation shows that the amounts play their role of income support by covering unavoidable expenditure, including current expenditure and making up for shortfalls in their market revenues. 
Iz te ugotovitve je razvidno, da zneski opravljajo svojo vlogo dohodkovne podpore s kritjem neizogibnih stroškov, vključno s tekočimi stroški in izpadom njihovih tržnih prihodkov.
The decision on the calculation method for the Young Farmer top-up is at the discretion of Member States, who can link the amount of the top-up to the average payment per hectare, to the basic payment or grant a lump sum per farmer. 
Odločitev glede metode izračuna za dodatek za mladega kmeta je prepuščena presoji držav članic, ki lahko znesek dodatnega plačila povežejo s povprečnim plačilom na hektar ali osnovnim plačilom ali pa odobrijo enkratno plačilo na kmeta.
IT and ES have decided to base it on the average value of entitlements held. 
Italija in Španija sta se odločili, da bo izračun temeljil na povprečni vrednosti pravic, ki jih ima kmet.
However, it is important to specify that: - young farmers with no entitlements at all are a priority category for allocation of payment entitlements from the national reserve and in that case, they are provided payment entitlements of value at the national/regional average. - young farmers with entitlements below the national/regional average are entitled to an increase in the value of their payment entitlements from the reserve. 
Vendar je treba poudariti, da: – so mladi kmetje brez vsakih pravic prednostna kategorija za dodelitev plačilnih pravic iz nacionalne rezerve, pri čemer se jim v tem primeru zagotovijo plačilne pravice v vrednosti nacionalnega/regionalnega povprečja; – so mladi kmetje s pravicami, ki imajo nižjo vrednost od nacionalnega/regionalnega povprečja, upravičeni do povečanja vrednosti plačilnih pravic iz rezerve.
Therefore, thanks to the reserve of payment entitlements, the young farmers who are not inheriting or obtaining high-value entitlements previously held by other farmers are generally less penalised. 
Zaradi rezerve plačilnih pravic mladi kmetje, ki niso podedovali ali pridobili visokih vrednosti pravic drugih kmetov, na splošno niso v tako slabem položaju.
While the aid is limited to the first 5 years after the initial setting up of the young farmer, this 5-year period should be reduced by the number of years that elapsed between the setting-up and the first application to the scheme. 
Pomoč je omejena na prvih pet let po prvotni vzpostavitvi kmetijskega gospodarstva mladega kmeta, vendar bi bilo treba to petletno obdobje skrajšati za število let, ki so pretekla med vzpostavitvijo in prvo vlogo za to shemo.
The total duration and timing of the support depends thus on both the timing of setting-up and that of the application. 
Skupno trajanje in čas izplačila podpore sta torej odvisna od tega, kdaj je bilo kmetijsko gospodarstvo vzpostavljeno in kdaj je bila predložena vloga.
Furthermore, see the Commission's reply to paragraph 19. 
Poleg tega glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 19.
It is to be noted that Andalucía has reintroduced the selection criterion by which the applicants setting up as a result of an early retirement receive more points as of 7 April, 2017. 
Opozoriti je treba, da je Andaluzija ponovno uvedla merilo za izbor, v skladu s katerim od 7.aprila2017 vlagatelji zahtevkov, ki vzpostavijo kmetijsko gospodarstvo zaradi predčasne upokojitve, prejmejo več točk.
The threshold for Pillar 2 project selection in Puglia was not particularly low (30%). 
Spodnja meja za izbor projektov v okviru 2. stebra v Apuliji ni bila posebno nizka (30 %).
Four calls for proposals were launched in total (three between the end of 2009 and the beginning of 2011, and one in mid-2015) and during each call some projects were refused because not reaching the minimum points' threshold. 
Skupno so bili objavljeni štirje razpisi za zbiranje predlogov (trije med koncem leta 2009 in začetkom leta 2011, en pa sredi leta 2015), med vsakim razpisom pa je bilo nekaj projektov zavrnjenih, ker niso dosegli spodnje meje zbranih točk.
In order to avoid excluding beneficiaries having exceeded the maximum eligible age between two calls, the Commission services, in its advisory capacity, recommended all managing authorities to: a) distribute more homogenously the available resources in 2014-2020; b) open several calls along the whole programming period; c) set selection criteria ambitious enough to target the best beneficiaries in terms of quality and needs. 
Da se ne bi izključili upravičenci, ki so med dvema razpisoma presegli najvišjo upravičeno starost, so službe Komisije v svoji svetovalni vlogi vsem organom upravljanja priporočile, naj (a) v obdobju2014–2020 enotneje razporedijo razpoložljiva sredstva, (b)objavijo več razpisov v celotnem programskem obdobju in (c) določijo merila za izbor, ki so dovolj zahtevna, da se bodo izbrali najboljši upravičenci, kar zadeva kakovost in potrebe.
The Commission, as member of the Monitoring Committee, has informed several times the Managing Authority, that a minimum threshold of 1 point was far too low. 
Komisija je kot članica odbora za spremljanje organ upravljanja večkrat obvestila, da je spodnja meja zbranih točk z eno točko precej prenizka.
It was also mentioned that in case of not getting 2 points, the amount of the aid should be reduced by 10%. 
Navedla je tudi, da bi bilo treba znesek pomoči, če se ne dosežeta dve točki, znižati za 10 %.
In the last modification of selection criteria, in force as of April 7, 2017, the minimum threshold has changed to 6 points (for a maximum of 29 points, which means a threshold of 20%) with 10 % reduction of the aid if total is less than 7 points. 
Pri zadnji spremembi meril za izbor, ki veljajo od 7. aprila 2017, se je spodnja meja povišala na šest točk (od največ 29 točk, kar pomeni spodnjo mejo v višini 20 %) z 10-odstotnim znižanjem pomoči, če je skupno število točk nižje od sedem.
The Commission considers that the legal provisions in force (Article 5(1)(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 807/2014) allows Member States request, among other elements, information on the initial estimated income of the holding to be included in the business plan. 
Po mnenju Komisije veljavne pravne določbe (člen 5(1)(a) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 807/2014) državam članicam omogočajo, da med drugim zahtevajo informacije o prvotnem ocenjenem dohodku kmetijskega gospodarstva, ki bodo vključene v poslovni načrt.
In addition to the preparation of the business plan, the setting measure promotes economic viability of supported holdings through other means: - the support is only provided to young farmers who possess "adequate occupational skills and competence". - the support is conditional to the implementation of a business plan. - the support is provided only to farms of a minimum economic size (to be defined by Member States). 
Ukrep za vzpostavitev pa sposobnosti preživetja kmetijskega gospodarstva ne spodbuja le s pripravo poslovnega načrta, ampak tudi na druge načine: – podpora se zagotovi le mladim kmetom, ki imajo „ustrezno poklicno znanje in usposobljenost“; – podpora je odvisna od izvajanja poslovnega načrta; – podpora se zagotovi le kmetijam z najmanjšo ekonomsko velikostjo (ki jo določi država članica).
In addition, young farmers can benefit from a number of rural development measures promoting economic viability. 
Poleg tega lahko mladi kmetje izkoristijo številne ukrepe za razvoj podeželja, ki spodbujajo sposobnost preživetja.
Box 4 –Little evidence of improved viability Spain See Commission's reply to paragraph 61 on business plans. 
Okvir 4 – Le malo dokazov o izboljšanju sposobnosti preživetja kmetijskih gospodarstev Španija Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 61 o poslovnih načrtih.
The conditions mentioned are part of the definition of priority holding according to the Spanish law. 
Navedeni pogoji so del opredelitve prednostnega kmetijskega gospodarstva v skladu s španskim pravom.
In 2007-2013 programming period, one of the possibilities was to set-up as priority holding (as fixed in the national framework) and the grant was higher in this case. 
V programskem obdobju 2007–2013 je bila ena od možnosti vzpostavitev prednostnega kmetijskega gospodarstva (kot je določeno v nacionalnem okviru), nepovratna sredstva pa so bila v tem primeru višja.
As from 2011, the setting-up as priority holding was also a selection criterion. 
Od leta 2011 je bila vzpostavitev prednostnega kmetijskega gospodarstva tudi merilo za izbor.
Therefore part of the selection was done taking into account these conditions. 
Torej se je del izbora izvedel ob upoštevanju teh pogojev.
Control remains the responsibility of the regional authorities. 
Za nadzor so odgovorni regionalni organi.
For the checks regarding priority status of holdings corrective actions have been recently taken (following an AGRI audit in 2015). 
Kar zadeva preverjanja v zvezi s prednostnim statusom kmetijskih gospodarstev, so se pred kratkim sprejeli popravni ukrepi (po reviziji GD AGRI leta 2015).
The business plan is set up with the objective of developing agricultural activities based on investment, trainings, advisory, etc. The impact of the generation renewal must lead to better structured holdings and to their modernization, which means viability. 
Poslovni načrt se pripravi zaradi razvoja kmetijskih dejavnosti na podlagi naložb, usposabljanj, svetovanja itd. Učinek generacijske pomladitve mora privesti do bolje strukturiranih kmetijskih gospodarstev in njihove posodobitve, kar pomeni sposobnost preživetja.
While the level of support can be modulated according to the level of ambition of the business plan, as clarified by the Commission to Member States in the RDC of 18 March 2015, support cannot be linked to implementation of specific investments included in the business plan. 
Kot je Komisija državam članicam pojasnila v odboru za razvoj podeželja 18. marca 2015, se lahko raven podpore prilagodi glede na raven ambicioznosti poslovnega načrta, podpore pa ni mogoče povezati z izvajanjem posebnih naložb iz poslovnega načrta.
Poland's approach followed a logic of simplification for the provision of the support. 
Pristop Poljske je glede zagotavljanja podpore sledil logiki poenostavitve.
69. (c) The Commission has also a responsibility for reporting on the performance of the CAP as a whole. 
69. (c) Komisija je odgovorna tudi za poročanje o uspešnosti SKP kot celote.
The CMEF defines a set of indicators to be provided by the Member States for measuring the CAP performance against the objectives as laid down in Article 110 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, not by individual measure. 
Skupni okvir za spremljanje in vrednotenje določa sklop kazalnikov, ki jih morajo države članice zagotoviti za merjenje uspešnosti SKP glede na cilje iz člena110 Uredbe(EU) št.
As often several measures contribute to the same objectives, the effectiveness and efficiency of measures should be assessed in the course of an evaluation, not directly observed via result or impact indicators. 
Ker k istim ciljem pogosto prispeva več ukrepov, bi bilo treba uspešnost in učinkovitost ukrepov oceniti med vrednotenjem, ne pa ugotavljati neposredno prek kazalnikov rezultatov ali učinka.
For this reason, the indicators are linked to specific (result indicators) and general (impact indicators) objectives. (b) The Commission considers that the target indicator represents a reasonable proxy for the specific objective of the focus area for which it is defined: "facilitating the entry of adequately skilled farmers into the agricultural sector and, in particular, generational renewal". 
Zato so kazalniki povezani s specifičnimi (kazalniki rezultatov) in splošnimi (kazalniki učinka) cilji. (b)Komisija meni, da je kazalnik ciljnih vrednosti razumen približek specifičnemu cilju prednostnega področja, za katero je opredeljen: „zagotavljanje lažjega začetka opravljanja kmetijske dejavnosti ustrezno usposobljenim kmetom, zlasti pa generacijske pomladitve“.
A reasonable balance has to be established as regards the definition of monitoring indicators and their cost-effectiveness and data availability. 
Vzpostaviti je treba razumno ravnovesje glede opredelitve kazalnikov spremljanja in njihove stroškovne učinkovitosti ter razpoložljivosti podatkov.
The assessment of broad outcomes of supported measures (e.g. viability of the holdings, generation renewal, job creation, increase in educational and innovation level of young farmers, etc.) is to be placed in the context of evaluation, for which the CMEF indicators provide only a supportive function. (c) The selection procedures for farms to participate in the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) cannot be in such a way that it guarantees representativeness for all possible CAP measures, yet, it does provide useful data on other criteria such as age of the farmer and support received. 
Oceno širših izidov podprtih ukrepov (npr.sposobnost preživetja kmetijskih gospodarstev, generacijsko pomladitev, ustvarjanje delovnih mest, zvišanje ravni izobrazbe in povečanje števila inovacij pri mladih kmetih itd.) je treba umestiti v okvir vrednotenja, kazalniki skupnega okvira spremljanja in vrednotenja pa temu okviru zagotavljajo le podporno funkcijo. 10
The Commission envisages to finalise the examination of the ex-post evaluations of the Rural Development Programmes and will give feedback to the Member States. 
Komisija bo predvidoma končala pregled naknadnih vrednotenj programov razvoja podeželja in bo državam članicam zagotovila povratne informacije.
It will by the end of 2017 also provide a summary of the main findings based on all evaluations. 
Do konca leta 2017 bo tudi zagotovila povzetek glavnih ugotovitev na podlagi vseh vrednotenj.
Reply to third indent: The Commission envisages to finalise the examination of the ex-post evaluations of the Rural Development Programmes, by end of May 2017. 
Odgovor na tretjo alineo: Komisija bo pregled naknadnih vrednotenj programov razvoja podeželja predvidoma končala do konca maja 2017.
Reply to fourth indent: The Commission envisages to finalise the examination of the ex-post evaluations of the Rural Development Programmes, by end of May 2017. 
Odgovor na četrto alineo: Komisija bo pregled naknadnih vrednotenj programov razvoja podeželja predvidoma končala do konca maja 2017.
See Commission's replies to paragraphs 24(a) and 61. 
Glej odgovora Komisije na odstavka 24(a) in 61.
Facilitating young farmers’ access to credit from commercial banks is not an explicit objective of the EU support to young farmers, but by strengthening the financial position of the beneficiaries, it improves their access to finance. 
Olajšanje dostopa mladim kmetom do posojil poslovnih bank ni izrecen cilj podpore EU mladim kmetom, vendar ta s krepitvijo finančnega položaja upravičencev izboljša njihov dostop do financ.
However, in the last years the Commission has greatly promoted and facilitated the use of financial instruments in rural development, including by young farmers. 
Vendar je Komisija v preteklih letih močno spodbujala in olajšala uporabo finančnih instrumentov v okviru razvoja podeželja, tudi pri mladih kmetih.
The Commission agrees that it is difficult to establish the relationship between measures taken for young farmers, their viability and the number of young farmers. 
Komisija se strinja, da je težko določiti povezavo med ukrepi, sprejetimi za mlade kmete, sposobnostjo preživetja mladih kmetov in njihovim številom.