natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We approached our audit from a passenger’s point of view, analysing the different connections, travel times and prices for business and leisure passengers. 
Sodišče je revizijo izvajalo z vidika potnikov, analiziralo je različne povezave, čas potovanja in cene za poslovne in turistične potnike.
We also examined whether the EU co‐financed investments in high‐speed lines were cost‐efficient and effective, and well thought‐out and planned. 
Preučilo je tudi, ali so bile naložbe v proge za visoke hitrosti, ki jih je sofinancirala EU, stroškovno učinkovite, uspešne ter dobro premišljene in načrtovane.
A realistic long‐term plan to connect the different parts of the EU’s existing network is lacking, building high‐speed lines crossing national borders is not a priority for national governments, and the European Commission has no power to force them to do so. 
Ni realističnega dolgoročnega načrta za povezavo različnih delov obstoječega omrežja EU, gradnja čezmejnih prog za visoke hitrosti ni prioriteta nacionalnih vlad, Evropska komisija pa jih ne more prisiliti, da jih zgradijo.
In such a situation, the added value of the EU co‐financing provided for high‐speed rail lines is low. 
Zaradi te situacije je dodana vrednost sofinanciranja EU, zagotovljenega za železniške proge za visoke hitrosti, majhna.
But there is also good news: the number of passengers using high‐speed rail in Europe is growing steadily, from roughly 15 billion passenger‐kilometres in 1990 to more than 124 billion in 2016. 
Kljub temu pa je pozitivno to, da število potnikov, ki uporabljajo železnice za visoke hitrosti v Evropi, stalno narašča.
Reaching out, we presented the report to the European Parliament’s committees on Transport and Budgetary Control, as well as to the Council of the EU. 
Končna postaja proge za visoke hitrosti Revidirana postaja proge za visoke hitrosti Druga postaja proge za visoke hitrosti 23 Revidirane proge za visoke hitrosti Stuttgart–München Berlin–München Madrid–Barcelona–francoska meja Madrid–León Madrid–Galicija Eje Atlántico Pariz–Strasbourg Dijon–Mulhouse München–Verona Figueras–Perpignan Basque Y Madrid–Lizbona Torino–Salerno Milano–Benetke Sodišče je poročilo predstavilo odboroma Evropskega parlamenta za promet in proračunski nadzor ter Svetu EU.
Both institutions welcomed the report and endorsed our conclusions. 
Obe instituciji sta pozdravili poročilo in podprli zaključke Sodišča.
We also presented it to a number of national administrations and SAIs, as well as to researchers, industry stakeholders and the press. 
Sodišče je poročilo predstavilo tudi več nacionalnim administracijam in vrhovnim revizijskim institucijam, pa tudi raziskovalcem, deležnikom v industriji in medijem.
The report received considerable press coverage across the EU, particularly in Spain, Germany and EU-focused and financial media, as well as high interest on social media. 
Mediji v EU, zlasti v Španiji in Nemčiji, ter mediji, ki se osredotočajo na EU, in finančni mediji so veliko poročali o tem posebnem poročilu, veliko zanimanja zanj pa je bilo tudi na družbenih medijih.
23 ES - El cinco días: Los auditores de la UE critican la incoherencia de los trazados del AVE DE - Die Zeit: Bahnlinien: Ausbau schneller Zugstrecken in EU zu teuer und zu langsam IT - La Repubblica: Alta velocità nell’Ue, la Corte dei Conti europea boccia la rete UK - Financial Times: Bloc criticised over high-speed rail strategy 
ES – El cinco días: Los auditores de la UE critican la incoherencia de los trazados del AVE DE – Die Zeit: Bahnlinien: Ausbau schneller Zugstrecken in EU zu teuer und zu langsam IT – La Repubblica: Alta velocità nell'Ue, la Corte dei Conti europea boccia la rete UK – Financial Times: Bloc criticised over high-speed rail strategy
Special report in focus The Facility for Refugees in Turkey: helpful support, but improvements needed to deliver more value for money Turkey hosts the largest refugee population in the world: nearly 4 million people. 
Posebno poročilo v središču Instrument za begunce v Turčiji: koristna podpora, vendar so potrebne izboljšave, da bi dosegli večjo stroškovno učinkovitost Turčija ima največje število beguncev na svetu, in sicer skoraj štiri milijone ljudi.
This includes about 3.5 million Syrians, most of whom are living outside refugee camps. 
To vključuje približno 3,5 milijona Sircev, večina katerih živi zunaj begunskih taborišč.
The facility for refugees in Turkey supports humanitarian and non‐humanitarian assistance for the refugees and their host community, with total financing of €6 billion from the EU and its Member States. 
Z instrumentom za begunce v Turčiji se zagotavlja humanitarna in nehumanitarna pomoč za begunce in njihovo gostiteljsko skupnost, njegova skupna sredstva, ki jih zagotavljajo EU in države članice, pa znašajo 6 milijard EUR.
The political agreement also commits Turkey to put an end to irregular migration from Turkey to the EU. 
V skladu s političnim dogovorom mora Turčija ustaviti nedovoljeno migracijo iz Turčije v EU.
The humanitarian projects helped refugees to address their basic needs but did not always deliver the expected value for money or achieve the facility’s objective of coordinating support effectively. 
Humanitarni projekti so beguncem pomagali zadovoljevati njihove osnovne potrebe, vendar pa niso vedno zagotovili pričakovane vrednosti za denar ali dosegli cilja instrumenta uspešno koordinirati podporo.
All the humanitarian projects audited provided helpful support to the refugees. 
Vsi revidirani humanitarni projekti so zagotovili koristno podporo za begunce.
For example, the Emergency Social Safety Net project provided cash‐based assistance to 1.3 million refugees. 
Projekt mreže socialne varnosti v sili je npr. zagotovil denarno pomoč 1,3 milijona beguncem.
However, half of them have not yet achieved the outcomes expected, i.e. a lasting, beneficial effect which can be sustained without further financial support, and nine of the ten projects had to be extended. 
Toda polovica projektov še ni dosegla pričakovanih izidov, tj. trajnega ugodnega učinka, ki ga je mogoče ohraniti brez dodatne finančne podpore, izvajanje devetih od desetih projektov pa je bilo treba podaljšati.
The challenging operating environment was the main factor hindering the timely implementation of some projects by NGOs. 
Težavno operativno okolje je bilo glavni dejavnik, ki je oviral pravočasno izvajanje nekaterih projektov, ki so jih upravljale nevladne organizacije.
While the Commission had put in place appropriate measures to monitor the projects, the Turkish authorities’ refusal to grant access to beneficiary data for the two cash‐assistance projects in our sample – worth a total of €1.1 billion – prevented the Commission and our auditors from tracking project beneficiaries from registration to payment. 
Komisija je sicer vzpostavila ustrezne ukrepe za spremljanje projektov, vendar zato, ker turški organi niso dovolili dostopa do podatkov o upravičencih za dva projekta denarne pomoči v vzorcu – v vrednosti 1,1 milijarde EUR –, Komisija in revizorji Sodišča niso mogli slediti upravičencem projektov od registracije do izplačila.
We presented the report at a joint meeting of the European Parliament’s committees on Development and Foreign Affairs and Budgetary Control and subsequently to the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. 
Sodišče je poročilo predstavilo na skupnem sestanku odborov Evropskega parlamenta za razvoj, zunanje zadeve in proračunski nadzor, kasneje pa tudi Odboru za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve.
It was also presented to the Council’s working party on enlargement and countries negotiating accession to the EU, as well as to the press. 
Predstavljeno je bilo tudi Delovni skupini Sveta za širitev in države, s katerimi potekajo pogajanja za pristop k EU, ter medijem.
The report received significant media interest, particularly in Germany, but also in Denmark, Austria and the Benelux and Mediterranean countries, as well as in EU-focused media. 
Poročilo je bilo deležno velikega zanimanja medijev, zlasti v Nemčiji, pa tudi na Danskem, v Avstriji, državah Beneluksa in sredozemskih državah, ter medijev, ki se osredotočajo na EU.
Annual reports Annual report on 2017 EU budget Accounts signed off, clean opinion on revenue, qualified opinion on expenditure Every year, we audit EU budget revenue and expenditure, examining whether the annual accounts are reliable and whether income and spending transactions at EU and Member State level comply with the financial rules. 
Letni poročili Letno poročilo o proračunu EU za leto 2017 Potrditev zanesljivosti zaključnega računa, mnenje brez pridržkov o prihodkih in mnenje s pridržkom o odhodkih Sodišče vsako leto revidira prihodke in odhodke proračuna EU ter preuči, ali je zaključni račun zanesljiv ter ali so prihodkovne in odhodkovne transakcije na ravni EU in držav članic skladne s finančnimi pravili.
In addition, we specifically assess each major area of the EU budget, based on the headings of the 2014‐2020 multiannual financial framework (MFF), and provide information on budgetary and financial management and on performance aspects. 
Poleg tega posebej oceni vsako večje področje proračuna EU po razdelkih večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2014–2020 ter zagotovi informacije o upravljanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju, pa tudi o vidikih smotrnosti poslovanja.
We also analyse why errors have occurred, make recommendations for improvement and examine whether and how our previous recommendations have been put into practice. 
Analizira tudi, zakaj je do napak prišlo, daje priporočila za izboljšave in preučuje, ali in kako so bila njegova predhodna priporočila uresničena v praksi.
For our latest annual report on the EU budget, regarding the 2017 financial year, our auditors sampled and tested some 700 payments to beneficiaries across all spending areas, worth a total of around €100 billion. 
Za zadnje letno poročilo o proračunu EU za proračunsko leto 2017 so revizorji Sodišča preizkusili približno 700 v vzorec zajetih plačil upravičencem na vseh področjih porabe, v skupni vrednosti približno 100 milijard EUR.
This means we assessed around 700 different cases where EU money had been used to provide support for key infrastructure projects, SMEs, research organisations, farmers, students in EU Member States or beneficiaries in non‐EU countries. 
To pomeni, da je Sodišče ocenilo približno 700 različnih primerov, v katerih so bila sredstva EU uporabljena za zagotavljanje podpore ključnim infrastrukturnim projektom, MSP, raziskovalnim organizacijam, kmetom, študentom v državah članicah EU ali upravičencem v državah nečlanicah EU.
26 Key information 2017 EU spending €137.4 billion Audited amount €100.2 billion (703 payment transactions) Accounts True and fair – signed off as reliable Revenue Legal and regular – clean opinion Expenditure Legal and regular, except for cost reimbursements – qualified opinion (rather than adverse opinion) 
26 Ključne informacije Poraba EU v letu 2017 137,4 milijarde EUR Revidirani znesek 100,2 milijarde EUR (703 plačilne transakcije) Zaključni račun resničen in pošten – potrjen kot zanesljiv Prihodki zakoniti in pravilni – mnenje brez pridržkov Odhodki zakonita in pravilna, razen povračil stroškov – mnenje s pridržkom (ne pa negativno mnenje)
The downward trend in estimated levels of error continues This extensive work forms the basis for our Statement of Assurance, which we are required to provide to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with our mandate under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). 
Trend zmanjševanja ocenjene stopnje napake se nadaljuje To obsežno delo je osnova za izjavo o zanesljivosti, ki jo mora Sodišče dati Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v skladu s svojimi pooblastili iz Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
As in previous years, we provided a “clean opinion” on the accounts and on the EU’s revenue. 
Kot v prejšnjih letih je Sodišče dalo mnenje brez pridržkov za zaključni račun in prihodke EU.
Moreover, for the second year in a row, we were able to issue a “qualified opinion” (rather than an “adverse opinion”) on the EU’s expenditure. 
Že drugo leto zapored pa je lahko (namesto negativnega mnenja) dalo mnenje s pridržkom za odhodke EU.
A significant part of the 2017 expenditure that was audited was not materially affected by error. 
Na velik del revidiranih odhodkov za leto 2017 niso pomembno vplivale napake.
Moreover, the estimated level of error in payments made in 2017 was 2.4 %, down from 3.1 % in 2016 and 3.8 % in 2015. 
Poleg tega je ocenjena stopnja napake za plačila v letu 2017 znašala 2,4 %, torej manj od 3,1 % v letu 2016 in 3,8 % v letu 2015.
Marking the start of the Parliament’s discharge procedure The publication of our annual report also marks the start of the Parliament’s discharge procedure, during which the EU’s co‐legislator and budgetary authority decides – upon a recommendation from the Council – whether the Commission and other bodies have satisfactorily managed the EU budget, and if so, grants them a “discharge”. 
Začetek postopka Parlamenta za podelitev razrešnice Objava letnega poročila Sodišča pomeni tudi začetek postopka Parlamenta za podelitev razrešnice, v okviru katerega se sozakonodajalec in proračunski organ EU – na priporočilo Sveta – odloči, ali so Komisija in drugi organi zadovoljivo upravljali proračun EU, in če so ga, jim podeli razrešnico.
We presented our annual report to the Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT) on 4 October, the day it was published, and subsequently also to the Parliament’s plenary session, the Council (Economic and Financial Affairs) and 14 Member States’ parliaments and national authorities. 
Sodišče je svoje letno poročilo na dan objave 4. oktobra predstavilo Odboru Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor (CONT), kasneje pa tudi na plenarnemu zasedanju Parlamenta, Svetu (za ekonomske in socialne zadeve) ter parlamentom in nacionalnim organom 14 držav članic.
28 ECA President Lehne and Member Lazaros S. Lazarou presenting our annual report at the European Parliament plenary session, November 2018, Strasbourg. 
Predsednik Sodišča Lehne in član Sodišča Lazaros S. Lazarou predstavljata letno poročilo na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta, november 2018, Strasbourg. 28
New approach towards attestation engagement Assetoutinour2018-2020 strategy,wetookourfirststepstowardsmodifyingouraudit approach for the Statement of Assurance (SoA) audit. 
Nov pristop s prehodom na posel potrjevanja Sodišče je v skladu s strategijo za obdobje 2018–2020 sprejelo prve ukrepe za spremembo svojega revizijskega pristopa za revizijo za izjavo o zanesljivosti.
For Cohesion spending, we assessed the 2014-2020 controlassuranceframeworkandthereliabilityoftheregularityinformation produced by the Commission. 
Za porabo na področju kohezije je ocenilo okvir kontrol in zagotovil za obdobje 2014–2020 ter zanesljivost informacij o pravilnosti, ki jih pripravi Komisija.
This represented a first step towards the potential organisation of the SoA as an attestation engagement. 
To je bil prvi korak v smeri potencialne organizacije izjave o zanesljivosti kot posla potrjevanja.
The overall aim of the modified approach and the move towards an attestation engagement is to take greater account of the different layers of internal controls at the European Commission and in Member State authorities managing EU spending. 
Splošni cilj spremenjenega pristopa in prehoda na posel potrjevanja je večje upoštevanje različnih ravni notranjih kontrol v Evropski komisiji in v organih držav članic, ki upravljajo porabo EU.
It thus helps to make clearer where shortcomings remain, both at the European Commission and in the Member States, so that we can help promote accountability and further improve the management of EU finances. 
To pomaga razjasniti, kje še vedno obstajajo pomanjkljivosti v Evropski komisiji in državah članicah, tako da lahko Sodišče pomaga spodbujati odgovornost in dodatno izboljšati upravljanje financ EU.
We will apply this approach only where the necessary conditions for doing so set out in the international audit standards are met. 29 
Sodišče bo ta pristop uporabljalo samo v primerih, v katerih so izpolnjeni potrebni pogoji za to, določeni v mednarodnih revizijskih standardih. 29
Annual report on the European Development Funds Adverse opinion on payments The European Development Funds (EDFs) provide EU assistance for development cooperation to the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries and overseas countries and territories. 
Letno poročilo o evropskih razvojnih skladih Negativno mnenje za plačila Iz evropskih razvojnih skladov se zagotavlja pomoč EU za razvojno sodelovanje afriškim, karibskim in pacifiškim državam ter čezmorskim državam in ozemljem.
They are funded by the EU Member States and managed outside the framework of the EU budget by the European Commission and the European Investment Bank. 
Evropske razvojne sklade financirajo države članice EU, upravljata pa jih Evropska komisija in Evropska investicijska banka zunaj okvira proračuna EU.
Key information on our audit opinion on the EDFs is presented below. 
Ključne informacije o revizijskem mnenju Sodišča o evropskih razvojnih skladih so predstavljene spodaj.
30 Key information 2017 EDF budget €4.3 billion Audited amount €3.5 billion Accounts True and fair – signed off as reliable Revenue Legal and regular – clean opinion Expenditure Affected by material level of error – adverse opinion 
30 Ključne informacije Proračun evropskih razvojnih skladov za leto 2017 4,3 milijarde EUR Revidirani znesek 3,5 milijarde EUR Zaključni račun resničen in pošten –potrjen kot zanesljiv Prihodki zakoniti in pravilni – mnenje brez pridržkov Odhodki vpliv pomembne stopnje napake – negativno mnenje
Specific annual reports Agencies and other bodies Clean opinion for all but one of the EU agencies The EU agencies are located across Europe and employ some 11 000 staff. 
Specifična letna poročila Agencije in drugi organi Mnenje brez pridržkov za vse agencije EU razen ene Sedeži agencij EU, ki zaposlujejo 11 000 uslužbencev, so po vsej Evropi.
Their total 2017 budget, excluding the Single Resolution Board (SRB), amounted to €3.5 billion, which is equivalent to about 2.7 % of the total EU budget. 
Njihov skupni proračun za leto 2017 brez Enotnega odbora za reševanje je znašal 3,5 milijarde EUR, kar je enakovredno približno 2,7 % celotnega proračuna EU.
The SRB’s 2017 budget was €6.6 billion, funded through contributions from credit institutions. 
Proračun Enotnega odbora za reševanje za leto 2017 je znašal 6,6 milijarde EUR, financiral pa se je s prispevki kreditnih institucij.
European Medicines Agency (EMA) i n London, moving to Amsterdam. 
Evropska agencija za zdravila (EMA) s sedežem v Londonu se seli v Amsterdam.
New approach: single report on 41 EU agencies In 2018, we decided to present our financial audit results for EU agencies in a more user-friendly format. 
Nov pristop: eno poročilo za 41 agencij EU Sodišče se je leta 2018 odločilo, da bo rezultate revizije računovodskih izkazov za agencije EU predstavilo v uporabniku prijaznejši obliki.
While still providing an individual Statement of Assurance for each agency, we issued a single annual report covering all of them, including a summary document entitled “Audit of EU agencies in brief”. 
Sodišče je sicer še vedno zagotovilo izjavo o zanesljivosti za vsako agencijo, vendar je izdalo eno letno poročilo, ki je zajemalo vse, vključno s povzetkom z naslovom Na kratko o reviziji agencij EU.
In addition, as we do every year, we published our annual reports on European Schools and on the contingent liabilities of the SRB, the Commission and the Council. 31 
Poleg tega je kot vsako leto objavilo svoji letni poročili o evropskih šolah in o pogojnih obveznostih Enotnega odbora za reševanje, Komisije in Sveta. 31
Agencies’ locations across Member State 32 * Following the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the EU, the Council decided to relocate the EMA and the EBA to Amsterdam and Paris respectively in 2019. 
Sedeži agencij po državah članicah 32 * Po odločitvi Združenega kraljestva o izstopu iz EU se je Svet odločil, da bo leta 2019 agencijo EMA preselil v Amsterdam, agencijo EBA pa v Pariz.
Joint undertakings Clean opinion for all but one of the EU research joint undertakings Joint undertakings (JU) are the EU’s public-private partnerships with industry, research groups and Member States, and play an important role in implementing specific aspects of EU research policy. 
Skupna podjetja Mnenje brez pridržkov za vsa skupna podjetja EU na področju raziskav razen enega Skupna podjetja so javno-zasebna partnerstva EU z industrijo, raziskovalnimi skupinami in državami članicami. Imajo pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju specifičnih vidikov raziskovalne politike EU.
The European Commission is the public member of the joint undertakings and represents the EU. 
Evropska komisija je javni član skupnih podjetij in zastopa EU.
The private members include various partners from industry and research. 
Zasebni člani so različni partnerji iz industrije in raziskovalnih skupin.
One of the joint undertakings’ main objectives is to leverage contributions from members from private industry and the research sector; this is where their added-value lies. 
Eden glavnih ciljev skupnih podjetij je privabljanje prispevkov članov iz zasebne industrije in raziskovalnega sektorja.
33 Overall, our audit of the agencies for the year ended 31 December 2017 confirmed the positive results reported in previous years. 
33 Glavni zaključki Na splošno so bili z revizijo agencij za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2017, potrjeni pozitivni rezultati, o katerih je Sodišče poročalo že v prejšnjih letih.
We gave: o clean (unqualified) audit opinions on the reliability of all agencies’ accounts; o clean (unqualified) audit opinions on the legality and regularity of the revenue underlying the accounts of all agencies; o clean (unqualified) audit opinions on the legality and regularity of the payments underlyingthe accountsofallagencies,exceptforanadverseauditopinionforthe European Asylum Support Office, where a number of issues were identified. 
Dalo je: o revizijska mnenja brez pridržkov o zanesljivosti zaključnih računov za vse agencije, o revizijska mnenja brez pridržkov o zakonitosti in pravilnosti prihodkov, povezanih z zaključnimi računi vseh agencij, o revizijska mnenja brez pridržkov o zakonitosti in pravilnosti plačil, povezanih z zaključnimi računi, za vse agencije, razen za Evropski azilni podporni urad, pri katerem je ugotovilo več zadev, zaradi česar je dalo negativno mnenje.
Main conclusions Main conclusions o We signed off the 2017 accounts of all the EU’s joint undertakings as reliable. o We issued clean opinions on the revenue and payment transactions for seven JUs, and a qualified opinion on JU Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership, as the auditors found issues that in some cases prevented the effective functioning of internal control. 
Glavni zaključki o Sodišče je zaključne račune vseh skupnih podjetij EU za leto 2017 potrdilo kot zanesljive, o dalo je mnenja brez pridržkov za dohodkovne in plačilne transakcije za sedem skupnih podjetij ter mnenje s pridržkom za Skupno podjetje Elektronske komponente in sistemi za evropski vodilni položaj, saj so revizorji ugotovili zadeve, ki so v nekaterih primerih preprečevale uspešno delovanje notranje kontrole.
Opinions Another way in which we contribute to improving EU financial governance is by publishing opinions on the Commission’s proposals for new or revised legislation. 
Mnenja Sodišče k izboljševanju finančnega upravljanja EU prispeva tudi z objavo mnenj o predlogih Komisije za novo ali spremenjeno zakonodajo.
When these imply a significant financial impact, our opinions are required by EU law. 
Če imajo ti predlogi pomembne finančne posledice, so mnenja Sodišča v skladu s pravom EU obvezna.
They are used principally by the legislative authorities – the European Parliament and the Council – in their work. 
Mnenja pri svojem delu uporabljata predvsem zakonodajna organa – Evropski parlament in Svet.