natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The electronic format will increase the data quality and the on time reporting of irregularities and will avoid misunderstandings and misinterpretations. 
Elektronska oblika bo izboljšala kakovost podatkov in pripomogla k večji pravočasnosti poročanja o nepravilnostih, ter bo preprečevala nesporazume in napačne razlage.
The Commission is currently assisting Member States in this respect and is also considering an increase of the threshold from EUR 4 000 to 10 000 in order to reduce dataflow and focus on the most important cases. 
V zvezi s tem Komisija trenutno pomaga državam članicam in razmišlja o zvišanju praga s 4 000 na 10 000 EUR, da se zmanjša pretok podatkov in se osredotoči na najpomembnejše primere.
The Commission considers that the allocation of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture has been clearly defined: according to Annex 2 to the Communication of the Commission SEC(95) 249, OLAF is responsible in matters of recovery on reported irregularities. Any decision to write off irrecoverable amounts has to be taken by the Commission via the EAGGF clearance-of-accounts procedure that is conducted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture, in which OLAF assists throughout its different steps. Finally, regarding the suggested abolition of the black list, the Commission, while sharing the view of the Court that the system does not work well, thinks there is room for improvement of the scheme and would rather see the application of the tool by the Member States being improved, than simply abolished. 
Komisija meni, da je bila dodelitev pristojnosti med OLAF in Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo jasno opredeljena: v skladu s Prilogo 2 k Sporočilu Komisije SEC(95) 249 je OLAF pristojen za povračilo pri sporočenih nepravilnostih. Vsako odločitev o odpisu izgubljenih zneskov pa sprejme Komisija s pomočjo postopka potrditve obračunov, ki ga vodi Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo in kateremu na različnih stopnjah postopka pomaga OLAF. Končno, glede predlagane ukinitve črne liste, si Komisija s Sodiščem deli mnenje, da ureditev ne deluje dobro, vendar meni, da obstaja možnost izboljšave seznama in bi ji bilo ljubše, če bi države članice uporabile svoja sredstva za izboljšavo, kot da bi bila preprosto ukinjena.
There is certainly room for improvement, and the mere existence of the regulation is designed to have a preventive impact which, admittedly, diminishes if not effectively applied. 
Zagotovo obstaja možnost izboljšave in uredba sama je napisana tako, da ima preventivni učinek, ki se zmanjša, če se ne izvaja učinkovito.
In this context, it is worth pointing out that clearance of accounts started to systematically include aspects regarding the application of the black list in its audits. 
V zvezi s tem je smiselno opozoriti, da se je s potrditvijo obračunov začela sistematična vključitev vidikov o uporabi črne liste v revizijo.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/21 15.(b) Additional developments are to be found in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/21 15.(b) Additional developments are to be found in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud.
C 269/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 The effects of the updates during 2003 and Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million) have been taken into account. 
C 269/22 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.11.2004 The effects of the updates during 2003 and Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million) have been taken into account.
The Commission has defined as early as 1996 the following guideline (1) that the recovery procedure should be launched as soon as possible after the irregularity had been detected and should be completed within four years after the date of the first communication of fraud or irregularity. 
The Commission has defined as early as 1996 the following guide-line (1) that the recovery procedure should be launched as soon as possible after the irregularity had been detected and should be completed within four years after the date of the first communication of fraud or irregularity.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/23 (d) (f) constant case law of the ECJ which stipulates that the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to Community law cannot be less favourable than the rules prevailing in cases where there are violations to national law. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/23 (d) (f) constant case law of the ECJ which stipulates that the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to Community law cannot be less favourable than the rules prevailing in cases where there are violations to national law.
C 269/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 The distribution of the costs of writes off between the Commu-nitiy budget and Member States budget in the June 2003 decision should not be taken as a precedent for future decisions. 
C 269/24 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.11.2004 The distribution of the costs of writes off between the Commu-nitiy budget and Member States budget in the June 2003 decision should not be taken as a precedent for future decisions.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/25 66. and 67. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/25 66. and 67.
C 269/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 Commission estimates that, in undertaking its tasks, it should primarily focus on the appraisal of the efficiency and adequacy of adopted and executed measures. 
C 269/26 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.11.2004 Commission estimates that, in undertaking its tasks, it should primarily focus on the appraisal of the efficiency and adequacy of adopted and executed measures.
75. Ń The question of the act generating the obligation to communicate (preliminary administrative or judicial report) is defined in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 745/96. and has been widely discussed with Member States (see reply to paragraph 17). 
75. — The question of the act generating the obligation to communicate (preliminary administrative or judicial report) is defined in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 745/96. and has been widely discussed with Member States (see reply to paragraph 17). — The Commission is currently examining the question of increasing the threshold to EUR 10 000. — The Commission has already performed some analyses in which the use and the frequency of codes were examined.
The same procedure will be followed for other codes. Ń Efforts have been made to tackle the problem of discrepancies between Member State data and the ECR database. 
The same procedure will be followed for other codes. — Efforts have been made to tackle the problem of discrepancies between Member State data and the ECR database.
Context ............................................................... 
UVOD....................................................................
MainfeaturesoftheInitiativefortheperiod2000to2006....................... TheCourtŐsaudit........................................................ THECOMMISSIONGUIDELINES ............................................... 
SMERNICEKOMISIJE ........................................................ Ali smernice vsebujejo ustrezno definicijo transevropskih projektov? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Targetingofmeasures................................................ 
Alisoobmočja,kiizpolnjujejopogoje,jasnoopredeljena? .......................
Aretheeligibleareasclearlydefined? ........................................ 
Ali je preverjanje prispevalo h kakovosti programov pobude Skupnosti? . . . . . . . . . . . .
DidexaminationhelptoenhanceCIPquality? ................................. 
Ali je Komisija odobrila programe pobude Skupnosti v predvidenih rokih? . . . . . . . . . .
Were the results of the previous programming period taken into account? . . . . . . . . . . . 
Alisobiliupoštevanirezultatiprejšnjegaprogramskegaobdobja?..................
C 303/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 Paragraph Page 55-57 13 58 13 59-63 14 64-65 14 66-69 14 70-78 15 71-72 15 73-78 15 79-99 16 79-96 16 80-83 16 84-85 16 86-87 17 88-94 17 95-96 17 Recommendations ...................................................... 
C 303/2 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 Odstavek Stran 55–57 13 58 13 59–63 14 64–65 14 66–69 14 70–78 15 71–72 15 73–78 15 79–99 16 79–96 16 80–83 16 84–85 16 86–87 17 88–94 17 95–96 17 Priporočila.............................................................
Cantheproblemsaddressedbeattributedtotheexistenceofaborder? ............. Areprogrammeprioritiessynonymouswithidentifiedneeds?..................... Is there complementarity between the Interreg III CIPs and traditional ERDF interven-tions?................................................................. 
Ali so programske prednostne naloge skladne z ugotovljenimi potrebami? . . . . . . . . . . . Ali se programi pobude Skupnosti Interreg III in tradicionalne pomoči Evropskega sklada zaregionalnirazvojdopolnjujejo? ..........................................
Do the first projects adopted qualify as trans-European and do they offer added value? THEFEASIBILITYOFMEASURINGPROGRESSEXPOST ............................ Aretheprogrammeobjectiveswellstructured? ................................ 
Ali imajo prvi sprejeti projekti transevropski značaj in ali zagotavljajo dodano vrednost? MOŽNOSTNAKNADNEGAMERJENJANAPREDKA ............................... Alisociljiprogramovdobrostrukturirani? ...................................
Conclusion ............................................................ 
Alisociljimerljiviinkvantificirani? .........................................
Preparation and the start of implementation are generally characterised by coopera-tion.............................................................. 
ZAKLJUČKIINPRIPOROČILA .................................................
Analyses are generally integrated but of little use; no connection exists between analyses and the definition of programme measures; the added value of projects needstobeenhanced ................................................ The available tools are inadequate to the task of measuring the impact of CIPs in rela-tiontotheirobjectives ............................................... 97-99 17 
Analize so v glavnem celostne, vendar malo uporabne; med analizami in opredelitvijo ukrepov programov in projektov ni povezave, njihovo dodano vrednost pa bi bilotrebapovečati .................................................. Razpoložljiva orodja niso primerna za merjenje učinka programov pobude Skupno-stizvidikanjihovihciljev .............................................
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/3 CI CIP EEIG ERDF ESDP JTS Managing authority Monitoring committee NUTS Objective 1 Objective 2 Paying authority ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY Community Initiative. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/3 Organ upravljanja Plačilni organ Usmerjevalni odbor Nadzorni odbor ESRR SS EGIZ PS NUTS Cilj 1 Cilj 2 PPS EPPR SEZNAM KRATIC IN GLOSAR Organ oblasti ali organ, ki je imenovan za upravljanje programa pomoči.
It is responsible, on the one hand, for the efficiency and correctness of management and, on the other hand, for implementation (receiving, examining and evaluating proposed operations, gathering data, drawing up the annual report, organising the mid-term evaluation, etc.). 
Na eni strani je zadolžen za učinkovitost in pravilnost upravljanja ter na drugi strani za izvajanje (sprejemanje, preverjanje in ocenjevanje predlaganih ukrepov, zbiranje podatkov, pripravo letnega poročila, organizacijo vmesnih ocenjevanj itd.).
Body appointed for each programme by the Member States concerned. 
Pristojni organ, ki ga za vsak program imenujejo zadevne države članice.
It is responsible for checking how assistance is being managed by the managing authority, ensuring compliance with the programme priorities and implementing rules and reviewing the programme evaluation. 
Zadolžen je za preverjanje, kako dobro organ upravljanja opravlja svojo nalogo, zagotavljanje upoštevanja prednostnih nalog in izvedbenih določb programa ter za preverjanje njegove ocene.
Nomenclature of Statistical Territorial Units, which divides each Member State into a hierarchy of regions (NUTS level I). These are then subdivided into NUTS level II regions, which are again sub-divided into NUTS level III. 
Nomenklatura statističnih teritorialnih enot, ki vsako državo članico hierarhično razdeljuje v regije na ravni NUTS I, od katerih je vsaka nato podrazdeljena v regije NUTS II, le-te pa v NUTS III.
The territory of the European Union comprises 78 regions at level I, 210 regions at level II and 1 093 at level III. 
Ozemlje Evropske unije ima tako 78 regij na ravni NUTS I, 210 na ravni NUTS II in 1 093 na ravni NUTS III.
One of the three priority objectives of the Structural Funds. 
Eden od treh prednostnih ciljev strukturnih skladov.
It seeks to promote the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind. 
Njegov namen je spodbujati razvoj in strukturno prilagajanje regij, ki zaostajajo v razvoju.
As a rule, all the Funds contribute to programmes targeting these regions. 
Praviloma vsi skladi prispevajo k programom, namenjenim tem regijam.
It seeks to support the economic and social conversion of areas facing structural difficulties. 
Njegov namen je spodbujati gospodarsko in socialno preobrazbo območij s strukturnimi težavami.
Only the ERDF and the European Social Fund (ESF) contribute under this objective. 
V tem okviru posredujeta samo Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) in Evropski socialni sklad (ESS).
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. 
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (prednosti, pomanjkljivosti, priložnosti in nevarnosti).
SWOT analysis is a strategy definition tool. 
Analiza SWOT je orodje, ki pomaga pri opredelitvi politike.
It consists of establishing a list of strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the field concerned, which in this case is a territorial area. 
Z njo se pripravi popis prednosti in pomanjkljivosti ter priložnosti in nevarnosti na preučevanem področju, ki je v tem primeru določeno ozemeljsko območje.
Generic term used for the three strands of the Initiative: cross-border cooperation (Strand A), transnational cooperation (Strand B) and interregional cooperation (Strand C). 
Izraz, ki se splošno uporablja za tri usmeritve pobude: čezmejno sodelovanje (usmeritev A), transnacionalno sodelovanje (usmeritev B) in medregionalno sodelovanje (usmeritev C).
7.12.2004 The Interreg Community Initiative (CI) was launched in 1990 in an attempt to tackle the isolation of border areas. 
7.12.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/5 POVZETEK I. Pobuda Skupnosti Interreg je bila uvedena leta 1990 zaradi ugotovitve, da so obmejna področja izolirana.
By proposing cooperation between partners in different Member States, it contributes to the opening of borders. 
S to pobudo se partnerjem v različnih državah članicah predlaga sodelovanje, to pa prispeva k odpiranju meja.
It was renewed for the periods 1994 to 1999 (Interreg II) and 2000 to 2006 (Interreg III). 
Pobuda je bila podaljšana za obdobji 1994–1999 (Interreg II) in 2000–2006 (Interreg III).
With commitment appropriations of 4 875 million euro, Interreg III is the most substantial CI. 
Z odobritvami za prevzem obveznosti v višini 4 875 milijonov eurov je Interreg III najpomembnejša pobuda Skupnosti.
The CourtŐs audit of Interreg III covered the period from the preparation of the Commission guidelines to the first decisions to adopt beneficiariesŐ projects. 
Revizija pobude Interreg III, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, zajema obdobje od priprave smernic Komisije do prvih odločb o sprejetju projektov upravičencev.
The objective was to answer the following questions: (a) Do the guidelines make it easier to attain the CI objectives? (b) Did the Commission use a suitable procedure for examining CIP proposals and were decisions taken within the agreed deadlines? (c) Did the various partners cooperate as provided by the guidelines? (d) Was the initial analysis for each region consistent with the priorities and measures of the corresponding CIP, as required by the guidelines? (e) Will it be possible to measure progress ex post? 
Cilj revizije je bil odgovoriti na naslednja vprašanja: (a) Ali smernice pospešujejo dosego ciljev pobude Skupnosti? (b) Ali je Komisija uporabila primeren postopek za preverjanja predlogov za programe pobude Skupnosti in ali so bile odločbe sprejete v dogovorjenih rokih? (c) Ali so različni partnerji sodelovali, kot je predvideno v smernicah? (d) Ali je bila začetna analiza za vsako regijo skladna s prioritetami in ukrepi zadevnih programov pobude Skupnosti, kot zahtevajo smernice? (e) Ali bo naknadno merjenje napredka možno?
The Interreg III guidelines focus on the procedures for implementing programmes that seek to enhance cooperation. 
Smernice programa Interreg III se osredotočajo na postopke za izvajanje programov, ki skušajo krepiti sodelovanje.
However, they were not made available until preparation of the CIP proposals had been under way for at least a year. 
Vendar so bile dostopne šele, ko je priprava predlogov programov pobude Skupnosti potekala že vsaj eno leto.
The proposed objectives are not targeted and cannot be measured or quantified. 
Predlagani cilji niso ciljno naravnani ter niso merljivi in kvantificirani.
There are no indicators with which to assess how much overall progress has been made. 
Prav tako ni kazalnikov, s katerimi bi se dalo oceniti, kolikšen je bil splošni napredek.
Procedures by which the Commission could examine CIP proposals had been devised and put in place. 
Postopki, s katerimi lahko Komisija preverja predloge za programe pobude Skupnosti, so bili opredeljeni in vzpostavljeni.
However, the assessment criteria were under-prepared and insufficient improvements had been made in response to the significant shortcomings identified in the proposals. 
Vendar priprava ocenjevalnih meril ni bila zadovoljiva, večje pomanjkljivosti, odkrite pri predlogih, pa ne odpravljene.
The adoption of the programmes was delayed, with the result that the process of cooperation between eligible regions was interrupted and the available appropriations were under-utilised. 
Programi so bili sprejeti z zamudo in zaradi tega je bil postopek sodelovanja med regijami, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, prekinjen, razpoložljiva proračunska sredstva pa niso bila izkoriščena.
V. As advocated by the guidelines, the programmes were prepared in the context of a consultation process. 
V. Priprava programov je potekala v okviru posvetovalnega postopka, kot je priporočeno v smernicah.
The partners from the various Member States generally contribute to implementation in a spirit of cooperation. 
Partnerji iz različnih držav članic s svojim sodelovanjem na splošno prispevajo k izvajanju programa.
However, there remain some obstacles to setting up CIP implementation structures that are genuinely shared and to allocating the financial resources of the ERDF. 
Vendar obstajajo ovire pri vzpostavljanju skupnih struktur za izvajanje programov pobude Skupnosti in pri dodeljevanju finančnih virov Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj.
From the point of view of consistency, the Strand A and B programmes incorporate numerous analyses. However, these are of little use. This is because the priorities and measures were established on the basis of other concerns which are not elucidated in the programmes. 
Kar se tiče povezanosti, programi usmeritev A in B vsebujejo številne analize, ki pa niso dovolj uporabne, saj so bili ukrepi in prednostne naloge določeni na podlagi drugih dejavnikov, ki jih programi ne po-jasnjujejo.
Neither were decisions made concerning the resolution of problems caused by the presence of a border, and the analyses do not help to fix the starting points in terms of which progress is to be measured. 
Poleg tega niso bile sprejete odločitve v zvezi z reševanjem specifičnih problemov, povezanih z mejami, analize pa ne pripomorejo k določitvi izhodišč za merjenje napredka.
The first projects to be adopted were prepared and will be implemented in the context of cooperation between the different partners concerned. 
Prvi sprejeti projekti so bili pripravljeni in bodo izvedeni v sodelovanju med različnimi partnerji.
However, because some projects are limited to the sharing of experience, they do not always contribute significantly to the resolution of problems specific to border areas. 
Ker pa so nekateri projekti omejeni na izmenjavo izkušenj, ne morejo veliko prispevati k rešitvi specifičnih problemov obmejnih področij.
The indicators are inadequate to the task of ex post evaluation of the progress made. They do not correspond closely enough to the objectives. 
Kazalniki ne dajejo zadostne podlage za izdelavo naknadne ocene doseženega napredka in so premalo povezani s cilji.
Moreover, some indicators need to be clarified and the information sources used to constitute them should be more precise. 
Poleg tega je treba nekatere kazalnike pojasniti, viri informacij, ki te kazalnike določajo, pa morajo biti natančnejši.
In most of the cases examined the computer application had still not been introduced. 
V večini preverjenih primerov se računalniški programi še vedno ne uporabljajo.
For the current period, the Court recommends that the systems of indicators applied to each CIP be simplified and improved in order to give a more valid measure of impact. 
Sodišče priporoča, da se za tekoče obdobje sisteme kazalnikov, ki se uporabljajo za vsak program pobude Skupnosti, poenostavi in izboljša, da bi se s tem povečala kakovost merjenja učinkov.
The project selection criteria should be strengthened so as to enhance the added value of projects, i.e., the degree to which they contribute to the resolution of border-related problems. 
Merila za izbiro projektov je treba okrepiti, da bi se s tem povečala dodana vrednost projektov, oziroma prispevek k reševanju problemov, povezanih z mejami.
C 303/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 IX. 
C 303/6 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 7.12.2004 IX.
If the Initiative is renewed after 2006, the Commission should launch a study to ascertain which problems are caused by the existence of a border. 
Če bo pobuda po letu 2006 podaljšana, mora Komisija narediti analizo in ugotoviti, kateri so obstoječi problemi, povezani z mejami.
Whatever the approach adopted, the study would help in the setting of concrete objectives to be given priority status in the CI and which give the CI itself added value. 
Ta analiza bi ne glede na pristop pomagala pri določitvi konkretnih ciljev, ki so prednostni za pobudo Skupnosti in ki ji zagotavljajo dodano vrednost.
Indicators therefore need to be defined for each strand. 
Zato je treba določiti kazalnike za vsako posamezno usmeritev.
Subsequently, setting detailed criteria for the CommissionŐs assessment of CIP proposals would make it possible to adopt a proactive approach towards the Member States. 
Poleg tega mora Komisija do držav članic sprejeti proaktivni pristop, in sicer z določitvijo podrobnih ocenjevalnih meril za predloge programov pobude Skupnosti.
The analyses requested at the level of each CIP should be used to set specific objectives and measure progress at that level. 
Analize, ki se jih opravi na ravni vsakega programa pobude Skupnosti, je treba uporabiti za določitev specifičnih ciljev in meritev napredka na tisti ravni.
X. The guidelines and methodology documents should be made available before work starts on preparing CIPs, and the ex ante assessorŐs role and the content of the programme complement need to be clarified. 
X. Dostop do smernic in metodoloških dokumentov je treba omogočiti pred začetkom priprave programov pobude Skupnosti, vlogo predhodnega ocenjevalca in vsebino dopolnila programa pa je treba pojasniti.