natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As in previous annual activity reports, this quantification of the risk relies on the evaluation of the financial impact of expressed reservations on the basis of the imputed risk per operational programme, taking also into account the 5 % security net provided by Regulations (EC) No 1260/1999 (for 2000-2006) and (EC) No 1083/2006 (for 2007-2013). 
Tako kot v prejšnjih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih se količinsko opredeljevanje tveganja nanaša na oceno finančnega vpliva izraženih pridržkov na podlagi s tem povezanega tveganja po posameznih operativnih programih, pri čemer se upošteva tudi 5-odstotna mreža zaščite iz uredb (ES) št. 1260/99 (za obdobje 2000–2006) in (ES) št. 1083/2006 (za obdobje 2007–2013).
The regulations set the maximum threshold for interim payments in the course of the programming period at 95 % of the amount to be financed under operational programmes. 
Uredbi določata minimalni prag za vmesna plačila v programskem obdobju v višini 95 % zneska, ki se financira v okviru operativnih programov.
The remaining 5% of Commission payments are thus subject to the Commission's decision at closure, which clearly limits the financial risk of non-recovery. 
Preostalih 5 % plačila Komisije je tako odvisnih od odločitve Komisije ob zaključku, kar očitno omejuje finančno tveganje neizterjave.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions 4.47. Based on its audit work, the Court concludes that the interim and final payments for the year ended 31 December 2010 for the policy group Cohesion, Energy and Transport were affected by material error. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA Zaključki 4.47 Sodišče je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela prišlo do zaključka, da so na vmesna in končna plačila za skupino politik kohezija, energetika in promet za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2010, vplivale pomembne napake.
4.48. The Court also concludes that Audit Authorities as a whole were partially effective in ensuring the regularity of payments. 
4.48 Prav tako je prišlo do zaključka, da so bili revizijski organi kot celota delno uspešni pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti plačil.
The following points should be noted: — since the adoption of its Action Plan in February 2008, the Commission has reinforced its supervision of the national management and control systems for the 2007-2013 programming period, in particular through its monitoring of the work of AAs and its increased use of interruptions and suspensions of payments, and — the Commission has continued its efforts to provide guidance to national authorities implementing OPs and to simplify the eligibility rules for Structural Funds. 4.50. 
Upoštevati bi bilo treba naslednje točke: — Komisija je od sprejetja svojega akcijskega načrta februarja 2008 okrepila svoje nadziranje nacionalnih upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov za programsko obdobje 2007–2013, zlasti s svojim spremljanjem dela revizijskih organov in večjo uporabo prekinitev in začasnih odložitev plačil, ter — Komisija si je še naprej prizadevala za zagotavljanje navodil nacionalnim organom, ki izvajajo operativne programe, in za poenostavljanje pravil za upravičenost za strukturne sklade.
Following this review and the findings and conclusions for 2010, the Court recommends that the Commission: — Recommendation 1: continues to monitor compliance with the eligibility requirements for EU funding, including in particular the correct application of EU and national public procurement rules (2009), — Recommendation 2: encourages national authorities to rigorously apply the corrective mechanisms prior to certifi­ cation of the expenditure to the Commission (2008-2009). 
4.50 Sodišče glede na ta pregled ter ugotovitve in zaključke za leto 2010 Komisiji priporoča: — Priporočilo št.
Whenever significant deficiencies in the functioning of the management and control systems are identified by national or EU bodies, the Commission should continue to interrupt or suspend payments to the OP until corrective action has been taken by the Member State, T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 4.49. — The Commission welcomes the assessment of the Court on the implementation and consequence of its 2008 Action Plan. The Commission exercised its supervisory role in 2010 by inter­ rupting 63 (49 ERDF and 14 ESF) payment deadlines and adopting one suspension decision for 2007-2013 operational programmes and five suspension decisions (ESF) on 2000-2006 operational programmes where serious deficiencies or irregularities have been detected. 
Kadar nacionalni organi ali organi EU odkrijejo bistvene pomanj­ kljivosti v delovanju upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov, bi morala Komisija še naprej prekinjati ali začasno usta­ vljati plačila, dokler država članica ne izvede popravnih ukrepov. 4.49 — Komisija izraža zadovoljstvo ob oceni Sodišča o izvajanju in posledicah njenega akcijskega načrta za leto 2008. Komisija je leta 2010 v okviru svoje nadzorne vloge prekinila 63 (49 za ESRR in 14 za ESS) rokov plačil ter sprejela en sklep o odložitvi plačil za operativne programe iz obdobja 2007–2013 in pet sklepov o odložitvi plačil (ESS) za operativne programe iz obdobja 2000–2006, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene hude pomanjkljivosti ali nepravilnosti.
These measures are maintained until the necessary corrective actions are put in place by the Member States. 
Ti ukrepi se ohranijo, dokler države članice ne uvedejo ustreznih korektivnih ukrepov.
The Commission is pursuing this strict policy in 2011, with 54 interruptions of payment deadlines decided (40 for ERDF and 14 for ESF) by 30 June 2011. 
Komisija v letu 2011 s 54 sklepi o prekinitvah rokov plačil (40 za ESRR in 14 za ESS), sprejetimi do 30. junija 2011, še naprej izvaja to strogo politiko.
4.50. — The Commission continues to monitor compliance with eligibility rules through its regular audit activity and the follow-up of all EU and national audits. 
1: Komisija z rednimi revizijami in spremljanjem vseh evropskih in nacionalnih revizij še naprej spremlja upošte­ vanje pravil o upravičenosti.
Adequate information is reported in the annual activity reports of Directors-General of DG REGIO and DG EMPL. 
Generalna direktorja GD REGIO in GD EMPL posredujeta ustrezne informacije v okviru letnih poročil o dejavnostih.
When necessary the Commission will continue to take the necessary corrective measures. 
Komisija bo po potrebi še naprej sprejemala potrebne korektivne ukrepe.
As far as public procurement is concerned, the correct implemen­ tation of EU directives is continuously monitored by the Commission. 
Kar zadeva javna naročila, Komisija nenehno spremlja pravilno izvajanje direktiv EU.
The Commission has shared with Member States an analysis of the types of errors detected in cohesion by EU audits in the previous years and has launched an exercise to collect best practices and possible answers by Member States to remedy such errors and reduce their occurrence. — The Commission already took the commitment, under the 2009 discharge resolution, to carry out a specific, risk based audit on the corrective mechanism in the Member States and to continue to timely interrupt or suspend payments, when necessary. 
Skupaj z državami članicami je naredila analizo o vrstah napak, ki so bile v preteklih letih odkrite med revizijo EU na področju kohezijske politike, ter začela zbirati najboljše prakse in možne odzive držav članic za odpravo takih napak in zmanjšanje njihove pojavnosti. — Priporočilo št. 2: Komisija se je že zavezala, da bo v resoluciji o razrešnici za leto 2009 izvedla posebno revizijo korektivnega mehanizma v državah članicah, ki bo temeljila na tveganju, in še naprej pravočasno prekinjala ali začasno ustavljala plačila, če bo to potrebno.
This strict policy is reflected in the 2010 annual activity reports of Directors-General of DG EMPL and DG REGIO. 
Ta stroga politika je izražena v poročilih o dejavnostih za leto 2010, ki sta ju pripravila generalna direktorja GD EMPL in GD REGIO.
The shift envisaged to a system of annual clearance of accounts for the programming period post-2013 is intended to further improve the assurance for Structural Funds. 
Prehod na sistem letne potrditve obračuna, predviden za programsko obdobje po letu 2013, naj bi dodatno izboljšal zagotovila za strukturne sklade.
The Commission also refers to its replies to the recommendations of the Court in its annual reports for 2008 and 2009. 
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoje odgovore na priporočila Sodišča iz poročil za leti 2008 in 2009.
EN 120 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S — Recommendation 3: on the basis of its experience gained during the first years of the 2007-2013 programming period, carries out an assessment of the use of national eligibility rules in view of identifying possible areas for further simplification and to eliminate potential sources of errors for the period after 2013, — Recommendation 4: proposes an amendment to the Structural Funds regulations for the current programming period, in order to require Member States to report on the financial implementation of FEIs. 
SL 120 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A — Priporočilo št. 3: naj na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih v prvih letih programskega obdobja 2007–2013, izvede oceno uporabe nacionalnih pravil za upravičenost, da se ugotovijo možna področja za nadaljnjo poenostavitev in da se odpravijo potencialni viri napak v obdobju po letu 2013. — Priporočilo št.
The audit of the implementation of FEIs is done through thematic audits as set out in the joint audit strategy for Structural Funds. 
Revizija izvajanja IFI poteka v okviru tematskih revizij, kot je določeno v skupni revizijski strategiji za strukturne sklade.
An annual report by the Member States on the financial imple­ mentation of FEIs could be envisaged in the Structural Funds Regulation for the next programming period. — The Commission agrees with the recommendation. 
V uredbi o strukturnih skladih bi se lahko za naslednje programsko obdobje predvidelo letno poročilo držav članic o finančnem izvrševanju IFI. — Priporočilo št. 5: Komisija se strinja s priporočilom.
The Commission is continuously providing guidance and advice to audit authorities on a wide range of technical and regulatory issues. 
Komisija revizijskim organom nenehno daje navodila in nasvete glede vrste tehničnih in regulativnih vprašanj.
The Commission review on audit authorities started in 2009 was also an opportunity to develop capacity-building actions towards national audit authorities, as further explained in the 2010 annual activity reports of Directors-General of DG REGIO and DG EMPL. 
Pregled revizijskih organov, ki ga je leta 2009 začela izvajati Komisija, je bil tudi priložnost za razvoj ukrepov za krepitev zmogljivosti nacio­ nalnih revizijskih organov, kot je dodatno pojasnjeno v poročilih o dejavnostih za leto 2010, ki sta ju pripravila generalna direk­ torja GD REGIO in GD EMPL.
As a result of the analysis of the annual control reports, audit opinions and error rates reported by the national audit authorities at the end of 2010, the Commission committed itself to provide additional, improved guidance to audit authorities on the issues raised by the Court. 
Na podlagi analize letnih poročil o kontrolah, revizijskih mnenj in stopenj napak, ki so jih konec leta 2010 posredovali nacio­ nalni revizijski organi, se je Komisija zavezala, da bo revizijskim organom zagotovila dodatna in izboljšana navodila v zvezi z vprašanji, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče.
Such draft guidance has already been discussed in technical meetings held so far and will be completed before the next exercise for the annual control report. — The Commission agrees with the first part of the Recommen­ dation. 
O osnutku teh navodil so na dosedanjih tehničnih sestankih že potekale razprave, ki bodo zaključene pred naslednjim letnim poročilom o kontrolah. — Priporočilo št. 6: Komisija se strinja s prvim delom priporočila.
The Commission's proposal for the revision of the financial regulation includes a timely clearance of accounts that will favour an alignment of the respective reporting periods by the Member States (annual control report and annual audit opinion), the Commission (annual activity reports) and the Court (DAS exercise/annual report) on the corresponding budgetary year (see also Commission reply to paragraph 4.41). — Recommendation 6: proposes to align the reporting periods of the annual control reports with the financial year of the EU budget in the Structural Funds regulations for the period after 2013 and to harmonise the approaches, so that the AAs’ audit opinions can be aggregated for each Fund at the national and EU levels. 
Predlog Komisije o reviziji finančne uredbe vključuje pravočasno potrditev obračuna, ki bo podpirala tudi uskladitev obdobij poro­ čanja držav članic (letno poročilo o kontrolah in letno revizijsko mnenje), Komisije (letno poročilo o dejavnostih) in Sodišča (DAS / letno poročilo) z ustreznim proračunskim letom (glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 4.41). — Priporočilo št. 6: naj predlaga, da se v uredbah o struk­ turnih skladih za obdobje po letu 2013 uskladijo poroče­ valska obdobja za letna poročila o kontrolah s proračun­ skim letom proračuna EU ter uskladijo pristopi, tako da bo mogoče revizijska mnenja revizijskih organov za vsak sklad združiti na nacionalni ravni in na ravni EU.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 121 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS SPECIAL REPORTS Follow-up of Special Report No 1/2006 on the contribution of the European Social Fund in combating early school leaving 4.51. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 121 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A SPREMLJANJE POPRAVNIH UČINKOV PREJŠNJIH POSEBNIH POROČIL Spremljanje popravnih učinkov Posebnega poročila št.
InSpecialReportNo1/2006,theCourtassessedthe adequacy of the procedures for the 2000-2006 programming period intended to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of ESF co-financed actions addressing early school leaving. 
1/2006 o prispevku Evropskega socialnega sklada k preprečevanju zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja 4.51 Sodišče je v svojem Posebnem poročilu št.1/2006 ocenilo ustreznost postopkov za zagotavljanje učinkovitosti in uspešnosti ukrepov za preprečevanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja, ki jih sofinancira ESS, za programsko obdobje 2000–2006.
The Court stressed that Member States’ management systems should be efficient, effective and economical in conformity with Community Regulations. 
Poudarilo je, da bi morali biti upravljavski sistemi držav članic učinkoviti, uspešni in gospodarni v skladu z ured­ bami Skupnosti.
The Court recommended in particular that, so as to maximise the potential impact of Community resources, Member States authorities should carry out an analysis of expected economic benefits and that the allocation of funding should be based on objective and relevant criteria. 
Zlasti je poudarilo, da bi morali organi držav članic opraviti analizo pričakovanih gospodarskih koristi in da bi moralo dodeljevanje sredstev temeljiti na objektivnih in relevantnih merilih, da se omogoči čim večji morebitni učinek sredstev Skupnosti.
The Court noted that reasonable annual targets for the reduction of early school leaving would help to meet objectives fixed by the European Council. 
Ugotovilo je, da bi razumni letni cilji za zmanjšanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja lahko pripomogli k doseganju cilja, ki ga je določil Evropski svet.
The Court’s recommendations have been partially addressed (see Annex 4.5a). 
4.52 Priporočila Sodišča so bila delno obravnavana (glej Prilogo 4.5a).
Elements of the management systems for ESF as a whole have been updated for the 2007-2013 programming period and this has affected measures addressing early school leaving. 
Elementi upravljavskih sistemov za ESS kot celoto so bili za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 posod­ obljeni, kar je vplivalo tudi na ukrepe, namenjene prepreče­ vanju zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja.
Specifically concerning early school leaving, in June 2011 the Council approved a recommendation concerning ‘Policies to reduce early school leaving’. 
Posebej v zvezi z zgodnjo opustitvijo izobraževanja je Svet junija 2011 odobril priporočilo o politikah za zmanjšanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja.
4.53. Theeffectoftheseactionshasnotyetbeendemon­ strated, not least because the main action aimed specifically at early school leaving was adopted only in 2011. 
4.53 Učinek teh ukrepov se še ni pokazal, tudi zato ne, ker je bil glavni ukrep, namenjen posebej zgodnji opustitvi izobra­ ževanja, sprejet šele leta 2011.
The Court notes that a clear link between the specific priorities and objectives regarding early school leaving and the level of funding allocated is still not present in the Operational Programmes. 
Sodišče opaža, da operativni programi še vedno ne vsebujejo jasne povezave med specifičnimi prednostnimi nalogami in cilji v zvezi z zgodnjo opustit­ vijo izobraževanja in stopnjo dodeljenega financiranja.
Although the Commission has recently expressed the intention to analyse the added value of EU financing within the scope of its own audits, it does not yet do so. 
Čeprav je Komisija nedavno izrazila namero, da bo v okviru svojih revizij analizirala dodano vrednost financiranja EU, tega še ne izvaja.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 4.52. 4.53. ESF operational programmes contain a clear link between the retained priorities, the objectives to be achieved, which are also translated into quantified targets at priority axis level, as foreseen in the regulatory framework and the level of funding required for achieving the objectives. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 4.52 4.53 Operativni programi ESS vsebujejo očitno povezavo med ohranjenimi prednostnimi nalogami, cilji, ki jih je treba doseči in so preneseni tudi v količinsko opredeljene cilje na ravni prednostne osi, kakor je določeno v regulativnem okviru, ter ravnjo financiranja, ki je potrebna za dosego ciljev.
The Commission proposals for the post-2013 period will build on the current provisions on programming and ex-ante evaluation. 
Predlogi Komisije za obdobje po letu 2013 bodo nadgradnja veljavnih določb o programiranju in pred­ hodnih ocenah.
Operational programmes will need to respect the regulatory provisions and demonstrate the link between priorities, objectives and level of funding. 
Operativni programi bodo morali upoštevati regula­ tivne določbe in izražati povezavo med prednostnimi nalogami, cilji in ravnjo financiranja.
Within the preparation of the draft regulations for the next programming period, it is envisaged to put a greater emphasis on the output. 
V okviru pripravljanja osnutkov uredb za naslednje programsko obdobje je predviden večji poudarek na izložkih.
Part of the DG EMPL's audit resources would therefore need to be re-oriented towards performance audit instead of the current compliance/financial audits. 
Del revizijskih virov GD EMPL bo tako treba preusmeriti s sedanjih revizij sklad­ nosti / finančnih revizij na revizije uspešnosti.
The Commission considers that the recommendations of the Court have been fully implemented taking into account the regulatory framework already settled for 2007-2013 at the date of the publi­ cation of the Court's audit report. 
Komisija meni, da so bila priporočila Sveta v celoti izvedena ob upoštevanju regulativnega okvira za obdobje 2007–2013, ki je bil v času objave revizijskega poročila Sodišča že določen.
In the context of the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission launched in early 2011 an action plan to reduce early school leaving, including a proposal for a Council recom­ mendation on policies to reduce early school leaving (approved in June 2011). 
Komisija je v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 na začetku leta 2011 začela izvajati akcijski načrt za zmanjšanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja, ki vklju­ čuje predlog za priporočilo Sveta o politikah za zmanjšanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja (potrjen junija 2011).
EN 122 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Follow-up of Special Report No 10/2006 on ex-post evaluations of Objectives 1 and 3 programmes 1994-1999 (Structural Funds) 4.54. 
SL 122 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A Spremljanje popravnih učinkov Posebnega poročila št. 10/2006 o naknadnih vrednotenjih programov Ciljev 1 in 3 za obdobje 1994–1999 (strukturni skladi) 4.54 Sodišče je v svojem Posebnem poročilu št.
InSpecialReportNo10/2006,theCourtassessed whether ex-post evaluations carried out by the Commission in connection with Structural Funds interventions over the 1994-1999 programming period yielded adequate estimates of the impact of the Structural Funds interventions and whether this analysis had provided useful recommendations. 
10/2006 ocenilo, ali so naknadna vrednotenja, ki jih je Komisija izvedla v zvezi z ukrepi pomoči, financiranimi iz strukturnih skladov v programskem obdobju 1994–1995, prinesla ustrezne ocene vpliva ukrepov pomoči iz strukturnih skladov in ali je ta analiza zagotovila koristna priporočila.
The audit identified weaknesses in the evaluation process which limited the assessment of the impact of the Structural Funds. 
Revizija je pokazala slabosti v procesu vrednotenja, ki so omejile oceno vpliva strukturnih skladov.
DG Regional Policy and DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion addressed most of the key issues raised in Special Report No 10/2006 in their 2000-2006 ex-post evaluations (see Annex 4.5b). 
4.55 GD za regionalno politiko in GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključenost sta pri svojih naknadnih vred­ notenjih za obdobje 2002–2006 obravnavala večino ključnih vprašanj iz Posebnega poročila Sodišča št.10/2006 (glej Prilogo 4.5b).
They initiated a shift from a country approach to a key thematic areas approach in order to better focus on strategic issues in a Union of 27 Member States. 
Pristop po državah sta začela nadomeščati s pristopom po ključnih tematskih področjih, da bi se v Uniji s 27 državami članicami bolje osredotočila na strateška vpra­ šanja.
Ex-post evaluations should have been facilitated by the requirement introduced in the 2000-2006 legal framework for a mandatory mid-term evaluation. 
Naknadna vrednotenja bi morala olajšati zahteva po obveznih vmesnih vrednotenjih, ki je bila uvedena v pravnem okviru za obdobje 2000–2006.
However, when the mid-term evaluations were carried out, there were significant weak­ nesses in monitoring systems in the Member States and it was too early to assess effectiveness of spending (see also Special Report No 1/2007 on the mid-term processes). 
Vendar so ob izvedbi vmesnih vrednotenj obstajale precejšnje pomanjkljivosti v sistemih držav članic za spremljanje in je bilo še prezgodaj za oceno uspešnosti porabe (glej tudi Posebno poročilo št. 1/2007 o vmesnih postopkih).
To improve the quality control of ex-post evaluations, both DGs allocated more dedicated resources, defined better Terms of Reference for the evaluation packages and strengthened quality control procedures. 4.56. 
Za izboljšanje kontrole kakovosti naknadnih vrednotenj sta oba generalna direktorata dodelila več namenskih virov, bolje opredelila projektne naloge za pakete vrednotenj in okrepila postopke za kontrolo kakovosti.
For 2007-2013, both DGs would benefit from strengthening the mechanisms to improve the quality of Member States own evaluations and the use of counterfactual analysis (DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion) or from its expansion (DG Regional Policy). 
4.56 Za obdobje 2007–2013 bi obema generalnima direk­ toratoma koristila okrepitev mehanizmov za izboljšanje kako­ vosti vrednotenj, ki jih izvajajo države članice, in uporaba analize nasprotnih dejstev (GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključenost) ali razširitev njenega obsega (GD za regionalno politiko).
Concerning the assessment of Structural Funds’ efficiency, the recently estab­ lished infrastructure unit cost database should continue to be populated to enable its use (DG Regional Policy). 
Kar zadeva oceno učinkovitosti struk­ turnih skladov, bi se morala še naprej polniti nedavno vzpo­ stavljena podatkovna zbirka o infrastrukturnih stroških na enoto, tako da jo bo mogoče začeti uporabljati (GD za regio­ nalno politiko).