natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
31 Recommendation 2 - Increase practical support to practitioners and policymakers in Member States The Commission should: improve communication from practitioners to policymakers through a regular and structured exchange of approaches and ideas; analyse participation by Member StatesŐ practitioners in the RAN, with a particular focus on whether less active countries should be more involved; analyse the involvement of practitioners within the RAN ensuring that different types of stakeholders are adequately represented, including networks of organisations on the ground, without links with government, in order to enhance the bottom-up approach; support managers of counter-radicalisation projects in assessing the effectiveness and transferability of practices, and increase the relevance of the RAN Collection by including more information on the effectiveness of practices and the context in which they can be transferred; include in the RAN Collection a clear explanation of how actions are financed with EU funds. 
Priporočilo 2: povečati praktično podporo za strokovnjake iz prakse in oblikovalce politike v državah članicah Komisija bi morala: z redno in strukturirano izmenjavo pristopov in idej izboljšati komuniciranje med strokovnjaki iz prakse in oblikovalci politike; analizirati sodelovanje strokovnjakov držav članic iz prakse v Mreži za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji in pri tem posvečati posebno pozornost temu, ali bi bilo treba povečati sodelovanje manj aktivnih držav; analizirati delovanje strokovnjakov iz prakse v Mreži za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji in zagotavljati, da so različne vrste deležnikov, vključno z mrežami organizacij na terenu brez povezave z vlado, ustrezno zastopane, da bi se okrepil pristop od spodaj navzgor; 33 podpirati vodje projektov za boj proti radikalizaciji pri ocenjevanju uspešnosti in prenosljivosti praks ter povečati relevantnost zbirke Mreže za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji z vključitvijo več informacij o uspešnosti praks in o okoliščinah, v katerih jih je mogoče prenašati; v zbirko Mreže za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji vključiti jasne razlage tega, kako se ukrepi financirajo s sredstvi EU.
The Commission has not sufficiently developed its framework for assessing whether its support is effective and offers value for money. 
Komisija ni dovolj dodelala svojega okvira za ocenjevanje tega, ali je njena podpora uspešna in stroškovno učinkovita.
For example, it has not broken down the overall policy objectives into more specific and measurable objectives, and the funds that the Commission has used to address radicalisation are not accompanied by indicators and targets designed to measure success in pursuit of this goal (see paragraphs 29 to 31). 
Tako na primer ni razčlenila splošnih ciljev politike na bolj specifične in merljive cilje, za sredstva, ki jih je porabila za odziv na radikalizacijo, pa ni bilo kazalnikov in količinsko opredeljenih ciljev, s katerimi bi se meril uspeh pri doseganju tega cilja (glej odstavke 29 do 31).
As a result, there is a risk that useful lessons might not be disseminated or taken into account when the Commission designs actions or develops its policy further (see paragraphs 32 to 36). 
Zato obstaja tveganje, da Komisija pri pripravi ukrepov ali nadaljnjem razvoju svoje politike ne bo razširjala ali upoštevala koristnih spoznanj (glej odstavke 32 do 36).
32 Recommendation 3 Đ Improve the framework for assessing results The Commission should evaluate its success in achieving its policy goals and ensure that EU-funded actions can provide evidence of how effective they actually are. 
Priporočilo 3: izboljšati okvir za ocenjevanje rezultatov Komisija bi morala ovrednotiti svoj uspeh pri doseganju ciljev svoje politike in zagotoviti, da se lahko za ukrepe, ki jih financira EU, dokaže njihova dejanska uspešnost.
In particular the Commission should: carry out the necessary consultation and research in order to identify objectives and indicators for evaluating its success and value for money in achieving its policy goals in helping Member States to address radicalisation. 
Komisija bi morala zlasti: izvajati potrebna posvetovanja in raziskave, da bi opredelila cilje in kazalnike za vrednotenje svojega uspeha ter stroškovne učinkovitosti pri doseganju ciljev svoje politike pri zagotavljanju pomoči državam članicam pri odzivu na radikalizacijo.
It should then report regularly on the overall progress made towards achieving the objectives of its counter-radicalisation policy, including the EU funds involved; request the RAN Centre of Excellence to provide more detailed reports on its effectiveness, e.g. participant satisfaction, the knowledge and contacts acquired, how these were used, and their impact on the job or on the organisationŐs results; oversee through the EU Internet Forum: Ľ cooperation between the EU IRU and national IRUs in ensuring complementarity and avoiding unnecessary duplication in referring terrorist content to IT companies; Ľ the extent to which removing terrorist propaganda has an impact on its prevalence on the internet; 
Nato bi morala redno poročati o skupnem napredku, doseženem pri doseganju ciljev svoje politike boja proti radikalizaciji, ter sredstvih EU, porabljenih pri tem; 34 zahtevati od Centra odličnosti Mreže za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji, naj pošilja podrobnejša poročila o svoji uspešnosti, npr. zadovoljstvu udeležencev, pridobljenem znanju in navezanih stikih, načinu njihove uporabe in njihovem učinku na delo ali rezultate organizacije; po Internetnem forumu EU nadzirati: • sodelovanje med enoto EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin in nacionalnimi enotami za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin pri zagotavljanju komplementarnosti in izogibanju nepotrebnemu podvajanju pri obveščanju podjetij IT o terorističnih vsebinah, • kolikšen je učinek odstranjevanja teroristične propagande na njeno razširjenost na internetu, • hitrost, s katero se odstranjujejo vsebine, na katere opozori enoto EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin; zagotoviti, da predlagatelji projektov prikažejo, kako bodo merili uspešnost svojih projektov.
This Report was adopted by Chamber V, headed by Mr Lazaros S. LAZAROU, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 20 March 2018. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat V, ki ga vodi Lazaros S. LAZAROU, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 20. marca 2018.
REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS "TACKLING RADICALISATION THAT LEADS TO TERRORISM: THE COMMISSION ADDRESSED THE NEEDS OF MEMBER STATES, BUT WITH SOME SHORTFALLS IN COORDINATION AND EVALUATION" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V. Since 2017, the Commission has improved its overview of EU funded actions and is able to identify synergies between different funds and actions in particular within the framework of the Security Union Task Force and its dedicated subgroup on radicalisation. 
Erasmus+ DG EAC ODGOVORI KOMISIJE NA POSEBNO POROČILO EVROPSKEGA RAČUNSKEGA SODIŠČA „BOJ PROTI RADIKALIZACIJI, KI VODI DO TERORIZMA: KOMISIJA JE UKREPALA V ZVEZI S POTREBAMI DRŽAV ČLANIC, VENDAR S POMANJKLJIVOSTMI PRI USKLAJEVANJU IN VREDNOTENJU“ POVZETEK V. Komisija je od leta 2017 izboljšala svoj pregled nad ukrepi, financiranimi iz skladov EU, in je sposobna prepoznati sinergije med različnimi skladi in ukrepi, zlasti v okviru projektne skupine za varnostno unijo in njene podskupine za vprašanje radikalizacije.
The objectives of the Commission's policy on preventing and countering radicalisation are set out in the relevant policy documents. 
Cilji politike Komisije na področju preprečevanja in zatiranja radikalizacije so določeni v ustreznih dokumentih politike.
The Commission underlines that individual projects and initiatives are evaluated and their achievements are recorded. 
Komisija poudarja, da se posamezni projekti in pobude ocenjujejo, njihovi rezultati pa beležijo.
This feeds into the general evaluation of funds and programmes. 
To je del splošne ocene skladov in programov.
However, the Commission recognises that the longer term impact of these actions is not measured in a systematic way. 
Vendar Komisija priznava, da se dolgoročnejši vpliv teh ukrepov ne ocenjuje sistematično.
The development of knowledge on radicalisation is not only done through projects funded under Horizon 2020, but also done through other EU funds and in particular the Internal Security Fund Police (ISF-P) including the Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) which is also tasked to share and establish good practices. 
Znanje o radikalizaciji se ne zbira le s pomočjo projektov, financiranih iz programa Obzorje 2020, pač pa tudi s podporo drugih skladov EU, zlasti Sklada za notranjo varnost – policija (ISF-P), vključno z mrežo za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji (RAN), katere ena od nalog je razširjanje in vzpostavljanje dobrih praks.
Projects funded under the European Social Fund aim inter alia to strengthen resilience more broadly but can also specifically address radicalisation (e.g. the project BAANA). 
Projekti, financirani iz Evropskega socialnega sklada, so med drugim namenjeni krepitvi odpornosti v širšem smislu, vendar so lahko tudi izrecno namenjeni odpravljanju radikalizacije (npr. projekt BAANA).
Exit strategies in the broader sense as well as rehabilitation and de-radicalisation projects are not only funded under the Justice programme but can be also funded by ISF-P as it is currently the case with the general call on radicalisation launched in November 2017. 
Strategije umika v širšem smislu ter projekti rehabilitacije in deradikalizacije se financirajo iz programa Pravosodje ter iz Sklada za notranjo varnost – policija, kot ponazarja splošni razpis za zbiranje predlogov za ukrepe proti radikalizaciji iz novembra 2017.
In this sense, many of the work streams address all forms of radicalisation. 
Zato številni njeni projekti obravnavajo vse oblike radikalizacije.
19. (a) The topic of media and communication has been addressed in different ways: it was included in the 2005 Commission Communication (chapter 2.1 Broadcast Media); this topic (including in particular the issue of polarisation) was also discussed in the framework of the RAN as well as ESCN (European Strategic Communications Network), and the Commission has given priority to this topic in the recent 2017 call for proposals (ISF-2017-AG-RAD). 
19. (a) Vprašanje medijev in komuniciranja je bilo obravnavano na različne načine: s sporočilom Komisije iz leta 2005 (poglavje 2.1 Radio in televizija); v okviru razprav mreže RAN in Evropske mreže za strateško komuniciranje (vključno z vprašanjem polarizacije), Komisija pa z razpisom za zbiranje predlogov za leto 2017 (ISF-2017-AG-RAD) posebno pozornost posveča prav tej temi.
Furthermore, the matter was raised in the High Level Commission Expert Group on Radicalisation (HLCEG-R) recommending in its December 2017 interim report for Member States (with the support of the Commission) to examine whether existing tools are sufficient to effectively prevent the spread of violent extremist propaganda via traditional media. (b) The Commission has put in place the necessary measures to address the needs to develop exit strategies. 
Poleg tega so o vprašanju razpravljali v strokovni skupini Komisije na visoki ravni za vprašanje radikalizacije, ki je v svojem vmesnem poročilu iz decembra 2017 državam članicam (s podporo Komisije) priporočila, da proučijo, ali obstoječi instrumenti zadostujejo za preprečevanje širjenja nasilne ekstremistične propagande prek tradicionalnih medijev. (b) Komisija je sprejela ustrezne ukrepe za odziv na potrebo bo oblikovanju strategij umika.
Already in the past, the Commission has funded major exit programs under ISEC (Programme Prevention and Fight against Crime), the funding of the European Network of De-radicalisation (ENoD) in 2012-2013 being the most important example. 
V preteklosti je Komisija financirala obsežne programe umika v okviru programa ISEC (Preprečevanje kriminala in boj proti njemu). Ustanovitev Evropske mreže za deradikalizacijo v obdobju 2012 – 2013 je najpomembnejši primer.
adoption of the 2014 Communication on Radicalisation, the Commission invited Member States to include the development of exit strategies as funding priority under their National Programmes. 
Poleg tega je Komisija po sprejetju sporočila o radikalizaciji iz leta 2014 države članice pozvala, naj razvoj strategij umika vključijo v svoje 1
Exit programmes remain a priority and have been included in a call for proposals opened in November 20171. 
Programi strategij umika so še zmeraj prednostna naloga in so bili vključeni v razpis za zbiranje predlogov iz novembra 20171.
Box 6 In addition to the procedures and mechanisms to facilitate coordination between different funds and initiatives mentioned by the Court of Auditors, coordination also takes place at the broader policy level in particular since 2017 through the Security Union Task Force as well as more specifically the subgroup on radicalisation. 
Okvir 6 Poleg postopkov in mehanizmov za olajšanje usklajevanja med različnimi skladi in pobudami, ki jih je omenilo Računsko sodišče, usklajevanje poteka tudi na širši ravni politik, zlasti od leta 2017 prek projektne skupine za varnostno unijo ter v okviru podskupine za radikalizacijo.
The Commission considers that, while a single document increases transparency, even without a consolidated list of EU funded counter radicalisation actions the relevant Commission's services coordinated actions through existing procedures. 
Komisija meni, da enoten dokument sicer povečuje preglednost tudi brez konsolidiranega seznama ukrepov za boj proti radikalizaciji, ki jih financira EU, vendar so ustrezne službe Komisije ukrepe usklajevale na podlagi obstoječih postopkov.
In 2017 the Commission set up the Security Union Task Force and its subgroup on radicalisation in order to improve coordination of EU actions addressing radicalisation and to identify synergies between different funds and actions. 
Leta 2017 je Komisija ustanovila projektno skupino za varnostno unijo in njeno podskupino za vprašanje radikalizacije, da bi izboljšala usklajevanje ukrepov EU za boj proti radikalizaciji in ugotovila, med katerimi skladi in ukrepi nastajajo sinergije.
The suggested opportunity for greater synergy between removal of content and counter narrative campaigns has never been submitted to the Commission or the EU Internet Forum, which pursues both objectives and would therefore have been the appropriate forum. 
Predlagana možnost za večje sinergije med odstranjevanjem vsebin in protipropagandnimi kampanjami še ni bila predložena Komisiji ali internetnemu forumu EU, ki se zavzema za doseganje obeh ciljev in bi bil torej ustrezni naslovnik.
In particular through the encounters under the EU Internet Forum or in the context of the ECTC (European Counter Terrorism Centre) Advisory Group of Europol established in October 2016 and in which VoxPol and ESCN participate, the Commission and Europol, respectively have facilitated closer engagement and coordination between EU funded actions. 
Komisija in Europol sta spodbujala tesnejše sodelovanje in usklajevanje med ukrepi, financiranimi iz skladov EU, zlasti s srečanji v okviru internetnega foruma EU ali svetovalne skupine Europolovega Evropskega centra za boj proti terorizmu (ECTC), ustanovljene oktobra 2016, v kateri sodelujeta VoxPol in Evropska mreža za strateško komuniciranje.
28. (a) RAN has already produced a large number of practical outputs in the form of inter alia handbooks and trainings (e.g. training programmes for Europe's police officers, Manifesto for education, Manual on Foreign Terrorist Fighters returnees to name but a few). 
28. (a) Med številnimi praktičnimi rezultati mreže RAN so priročniki in usposabljanja (npr. program usposabljanja za evropske policiste, manifest za izobraževanje, priročnik o tujih terorističnih bojevnikih povratnikih, če omenimo le nekatere).
The RAN Collection's primary purpose is to inspire other practitioners and the RAN Collection would not seem to be the place where practitioners would search for funding opportunities. 
Glavni cilj zbirke mreže RAN je navdihniti druge strokovnjake iz prakse. Ne zdi se, da bi strokovnjaki iz prakse zbirko uporabljali za iskanje možnosti financiranja.
The information about project funding is available in other contexts. (b) The Commission is aware of the reasons that explain the difference in participation of stakeholders from individual Member States. 
Informacije o financiranju projektov so na voljo drugje. (b) Razlogi za neenotno sodelovanje deležnikov iz posameznih držav članic so Komisiji znani.
In addition to the reasons mentioned by the ECA, it should be kept in mind that it is normal that practitioners from countries that faced higher terrorist threats or with more advanced prevent approaches and practices as well as expertise in place are more represented than others. 
Poleg razlogov, ki jih je navedlo Računsko sodišče, je treba vedeti, da je normalno, da strokovnjaki iz prakse iz držav, ki se soočajo z večjimi terorističnimi grožnjami ali ki so razvile naprednejše pristope in prakse na področju preprečevanja ter imajo več strokovnega znanja, sodelujejo bolj kot drugi.
The Commission continues to consider important to discuss with Member States their priorities, needs and challenges. 
Komisija še naprej meni, da je pomembno z državami članicami razpravljati o njihovih prednostnih nalogah, potrebah in izzivih.
Since 2017 this is done in particular through the HLCEG-R. Its interim report issued in November 2017 already provided useful steer for activities to be organised by the RAN and ESCN in the course of 2018. 
Vmesno poročilo te strokovne skupine, objavljeno novembra 2017, je že zagotovilo koristno usmeritev za dejavnosti, ki naj bi jih mreža RAN in Evropska mreža za strateško komuniciranje organizirali v letu 2018.
The RAN keeps, monitors and updates the list of participants which provides an overview of practitioners per Member State. 
Mreža RAN hrani, spremlja in posodablja seznam udeležencev, kar daje pregled nad strokovnjaki iz prakse po posameznih državah članicah.
Based on the list the RAN and the Commission can see how the participation by practitioners from a particular Member States evolves. (d) The RAN includes already a large number of organisations on the ground with no links to governments in addition to a large number of other relevant first line practitioners. 
Seznam mreže RAN Komisiji omogoča, da spremlja razvoj sodelovanja strokovnjakov iz prakse iz določene države članice. (d) V mreži RAM poleg številnih strokovnjakov iz prakse na terenu sodelujejo tudi številne od vlad neodvisne organizacije na terenu.
1 Call 2017-ISFP-AG-RAD 2 (e) Exchanges between practitioners and policy makers take place in different ways: There were a number of events where findings and recommendations from practitioners were shared with policy makers (e.g. the RAN High Level Conference in November 2016 or the RAN Conference on returnees in June 2017). 
Komisija meni, da so vpogled in izkušnje teh strokovnjakov iz prakse upoštevani v razpravi o politiki, kar zagotavlja pristop od spodaj navzgor. (e) Izmenjave med strokovnjaki iz prakse in oblikovalci politike potekajo na različne načine: Organizirani so bili nekateri dogodki, na katerih so strokovnjaki iz prakse svoje ugotovitve in priporočila delili z oblikovalci politik (npr. konferenca na visoki ravni mreže RAN iz novembra 1 Razpis2017-ISFP-AG-RAD 2
The Commission considers that the RAN Conference on returnees, together with the handbook and the follow up workshops on the same matter with Member States representatives are having a significant impact on the development of policies in this area at EU but more importantly at the level of Member States. 
Komisija meni, da konferenca mreže RAN o bojevnikih povratnikih, priročnik ter naknadne delavnice na to temo za predstavnike držav članic pomembno vplivajo na razvoj politik na tem področju tako na ravni EU kot, kar je še zlasti pomembno, na ravni držav članic.
The Commission is also engaged with Member States to determine where Member States see scope for further support through the RAN or otherwise. 
Komisija sodeluje z državami članicami tudi, da bi ugotovila, na katerem področju države članice vidijo možnosti za nadaljnjo podporo v okviru mreže RAN ali na druge načine.
The HLCEG-R set up in July 2017 is an advisory group which helps the Commission identify such needs and formulate appropriate responses. 
Strokovna skupina Komisije na visoki ravni za vprašanje radikalizacije, ustanovljena julija 2017, je svetovalna skupina, ki Komisiji pomaga opredeliti potrebe in oblikovati ustrezne odzive.
The recommendations of the interim report of the HLCEG-R of November 2017, when relevant to RAN, are reflected in its Annual Activity Plan for 2018. 
Priporočila vmesnega poročila strokovne skupine Komisije na visoki ravni za vprašanje radikalizacije iz novembra 2017, ki so pomembna za mrežo RAN, se odražajo v njenem letnem načrtu dejavnosti za leto 2018.
In this way the Commission ensures that the RAN's added value is maximised in practice offering services that address priorities and challenges identified by Member States. 
Tako Komisija zagotavlja, da ima mreža RAN v praksi čim večjo dodano vrednost, tako da ponuja storitve, ki obravnavajo prednostne naloge in izzive, ki so jih opredelile države članice.
The issue of radicalisation in prisons became a political priority in line with increased awareness among the relevant stakeholders in the prison and probation field. 
Vprašanje radikalizacije v zaporih je postala politična prednostna naloga v skladu z večjo ozaveščenostjo med ustreznimi deležniki v zaporih in na področju pogojnega odpusta.
Organisations such as the Council of Europe, EuroPris and CEP (Confederation of European Probation) started becoming actively involved with this issue only in the course of 2015 when the Commission identified actions to be financed by the Justice Programme. 
Organizacije, kot so Svet Evrope, EuroPris in Evropska konfederacija za pogojne obsodbe (CEP), so se začele dejavno ukvarjati s tem vprašanjem šele tekom leta 2015, ko je Komisija opredelila ukrepe, ki naj bi bili financirani iz programa Pravosodje.
The Commission considers that it is indeed important to possess sufficient information about progress and effectiveness of its actions overall support. 
Po mnenju Komisije je pomembno imeti zadostne informacije o napredku in učinkovitosti splošne podpore, ki jo zagotavljajo njeni ukrepi.
The Commission carries out systematic mid-term and ex-post evaluations for EU funds. 
Komisija sistematično izvaja vmesne in naknadne ocene skladov EU.
At mid-term, the outcomes of evaluations support the steering of the funds, allowing adapting the funds to a changing context in the boundaries of the legal basis. 
Rezultati vmesnih ocen se uporabljajo za usmerjanje skladov in tako omogočajo, da se ti v okvirih pravne podlage prilagodijo spreminjajočim se razmeram.
Ex-post, the outcomes of evaluations feed the policy development. 
Rezultati naknadnih ocen pa se uporabljajo pri oblikovanju politik.
However, given that the threat picture and Member StatesŐ needs can change quickly swift policy responses are required without in depth evaluations of previous actions necessarily being available at that moment. 
Ker se grožnje in potrebe držav članic lahko hitro spremenijo, so potrebni hitri odzivi politike, podrobne ocene preteklih ukrepov pa niso nujno na voljo v danem trenutku.
Furthermore, its overall support was reviewed in the comprehensive assessment of security policies published in July 2017 with which the Commission responded to the request by the European Parliament. 
Poleg tega je bila splošna podpora Komisije pregledana v okviru celovite ocene varnostnih politik, objavljene julija 2017, s katero se je Komisija odzvala na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta.
30. (a) The objectives of the Commission's policy on preventing and countering radicalisation are set out in the relevant policy documents. 
30. Cilji politike Komisije na področju preprečevanja in zatiranja radikalizacije so določeni v ustreznih dokumentih politike.