natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
12 BOX 2 TWO NEW MEASURES INTRODUCED IN THE 2009 REGULATION Article 63 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009: Member States are allowed by derogation to use funds previously paid as coupled payments in order to establish or increase the value of payment entitlements in cases of particular farming activities which are not necessarily linked to the formerly coupled payments. 
12 OKVIR 2 UKREPA, UVEDENA Z UREDBO IZ LETA 2009 Člen 63 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009: Dovoljeno je odstopanje, v skladu s katerim lahko države članice uporabljajo sredstva, ki so se prej izplačevala kot vezana plačila, za uvedbo pravic do plačila ali povečanje vrednosti pravic do plačila v primerih posebnih kmetijskih dejavnosti, ki niso nujno povezane s prejšnjimi vezanimi plačili.
Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 permits compensation arrangements for the dairy, beef and veal, sheep and goat, and rice sectors in economically vulnerable or environmentally sensitive areas or for economically vulnerable types of farming. 
Člen 68 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 dovoljuje kompenzacijska plačila za sektorje mlečnih proizvodov, govejega in telečjega, ovčjega in kozjega mesa ter riža na ekonomsko ranljivih ali ekološko občutljivih območjih ali za ekonomsko občutljive načine kmetovanja.
Member States are allowed to earmark 10 % of their national ceilings in order to create specific coupled support schemes for farming in these sectors. 
Države članice lahko 10 % sredstev iz svojih nacionalnih zgornjih meja namenijo za oblikovanje posebnih shem vezane podpore za kmetijstvo v teh sektorjih.
This option replaced and extended the possibilities of providing coupled support that was previously available through the Article 69 provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
Ta možnost je nadomestila in razširila možnosti zagotavljanja vezane pomoči, ki so bile prej na voljo v okviru določb člena 69 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP
14 AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH THE AUDIT SCOPE 11. 
14 OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP OBSEG REVIZIJE 11.
The audit examined the suckler cow and ewe and goat schemes. 
Pri reviziji sta bili pregledani shemi za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze.
The audit covered the period from immediately prior to implementation of the 2003 reform (i.e. 2005) up to and including 2010. 
Zajeto je bilo obdobje od tik pred začetkom izvajanja reforme iz leta 2003 (tj. od leta 2005) do vključno leta 2010.
The overall audit question was: Are the suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS: (a) targeted to the most relevant regions in Member States? (b) effective in maintaining production and thus avoiding negative social, economic and environmental effects? (c) well monitored and assessed by the Commission and Member States? 
Skupno revizijsko vprašanje je bilo: Ali je neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja SEP: (a) usmerjena v najrelevantnejše regije v državah članicah? (b) učinkovita pri ohranjanju proizvodnje in s tem pri preprečevanju negativnih socialnih, gospodarskih in okoljskih učinkov? (c) učinkovito spremljana in ocenjevana s strani Komisije in držav članic?
AUDIT APPROACH 13. 
REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP 13.
The audit was carried out by conducting audit visits to the Commission (Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development) and to four20 Member States maintaining the schemes, while developments in these sectors in two other Member States21 were examined by desk reviews. 
Revizija je bila izvedena z revizijskimi obiski na Komisiji (Generalnem direktoratu za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja) in v štirih izmed držav čla-nic20, ki so ohranile shemi, spremembe v teh sektorjih v preostalih dveh državah članicah21 pa so bile obravnavane s pregledom dokumentacije.
Furthermore, fact-finding visits were carried out to two Member States that used full implementation of SPS22 in order to compare the development of the beef and sheepmeat/goatmeat sectors in Member States that did not maintain the audited schemes. 
Poleg tega so bili opravljeni obiski za ugotavljanje dejstev v dveh državah članicah, ki sta SEP izvajali v celoti22, da bi tako primerjali razvoj sektorjev govejega ter ovčjega in kozjega mesa v državah članicah, ki niso ohranile revidiranih shem.
The audit evidence was collected through: (a) review of the Commission’s monitoring procedures and files concerning the preparatory work for legislative proposals in the two sectors, including evaluations and other studies; (b) meetings with the relevant national administrations as well as interviews with farmers’ representatives for both sectors; (c) examination of the quality of the analysis and the supporting evidence at the Member States as to the adequacy of the suckler cow and ewe and goat premiums in maintaining23 a minimum level of agricultural production in the agricultural economies in certain regions and, in particular, where farmers cannot have recourse to other economic alternatives. 
Revizijski dokazi so bili zbrani s: (a) pregledom postopkov spremljanja, ki jih izvaja Komisija, in dokumentov o pripravljalnem delu za zakonodajne predloge v teh dveh sektorjih, vključno z ocenami in drugimi študijami; (b) sestanki z ustreznimi nacionalnimi upravnimi organi ter razgovori s predstavniki kmetov iz obeh sektorjev; (c) pregledom kakovosti analiz in podpornih dokazov držav članic o tem, ali so premije za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze ustrezne za ohranjanje23 minimalne ravni kmetijske proizvodnje v kmetijskih gospodarstvih določenih regij, zlasti tam, kjer kmetje nimajo drugih gospodarskih možnostih; 20 Belgija, Španija, Francija in Portugalska.
21 Austria and Finland. 
21 Avstrija in Finska.
No specific audit work was carried out as regards Slovenia, which decoupled in 2010, or Denmark, which had decided to retain the ewe and goat premium only until 2012. 
Revizija ni posebej obravnavala Slovenije, ki je leta 2010 uvedla nevezano pomoč, in Danske, ki se je odločila obdržati premije za ovce in koze le do leta 2012.
22 Ireland and the United Kingdom (England and Scotland). 
22 Irska in Združeno kraljestvo (Anglija in Škotska).
23 Baseline for ‘maintenance’ established on trends prior to and after the introduction of SPS. Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
23 Osnova za pojem „ohranjanje“ je bila določena na podlagi trendov pred uvedbo SEP in po njej. Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP
(d) (e) (f ) on-the-spot visits to a number of final beneficiaries to discuss the situation of their holdings and the effects of the schemes on their production decisions; analysis of past trends regarding production, as well as social and environmental effects in the audited Member States and comparison with Member States applying full implementation of SPS along with either national or EU specific measures to target the sectors; review and analysis of relevant studies and statistics. 
(d) (e) (f ) obiski na kraju samem pri več končnih upravičencih zaradi razprave o položaju njihovih gospodarstev in vplivu shem na njihove odločitve v zvezi s proizvodnjo; analizo preteklih trendov v proizvodnji, pa tudi socialnih in okoljskih učinkov v revidiranih državah članicah ter primerjavo z državami članicami, ki SEP izvajajo v celoti skupaj z nacionalnimi posebnimi ukrepi ali posebnimi ukrepi EU, namenjenimi obravnavanima sektorjema; pregledom in analizo ustreznih študij in statističnih podatkov.
16 OBSERVATIONS TARGETING THE SCHEMES TO THE MOST RELEVANT REGIONS IN MEMBER STATES 15. 
16 OPAŽANJA USMERJENOST SHEM V NAJRELEVANTNEJŠE REGIJE V DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH 15.
The justification for the retention of the audited schemes was that in regions facing difficulties and for vulnerable sectors such as the beef and sheepmeat/goatmeat sectors, sufficiently targeted measures can mitigate the risk of abandonment of production and any consequent adverse social, economic and environmental effects. 
Ohranjanje revidiranih shem je bilo utemeljeno s tem, da se lahko z dovolj usmerjenimi ukrepi v regijah, ki se soočajo s težavami, in v ranljivih sektorjih, kot sta sektorja govejega ter ovčjega in kozjega mesa, zmanjša tveganje opustitve proizvodnje ter posledičnih negativnih socialnih, gospodarskih in okoljskih učinkov.
The audit assessed whether the Commission and the Member States have analysed and identified the most relevant regions in Member States i.e. the fragile regions and agricultural areas within their territories where abandonment of production would have damaging effects and whether the design of the schemes was suitable to reach livestock farmers there. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ocenjeno, ali so Komisija in države članice analizirale in opredelile najrelevantnejše regije na svojem ozemlju, torej občutljive regije in kmetijska območja, kjer bi imela opustitev proizvodnje škodljive posledice, ter ali so sheme zasnovane tako, da dosežejo živinorejce na teh območjih.
MOST OF THE FUNDS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO ADEQUATE TARGETING PROVISIONS 16. 
ZA VEČINO SREDSTEV SE NE UPORABLJAJO PRIMERNE DOLOČBE ZA USMERJANJE 16.
Some targeting of the funds is already implicit in the nature of these schemes and the agricultural activity which they subsidise, that is, an agricultural activity that is generally carried out by extensive grazing of animals on land that is not suitable for arable production. 
Sredstva so nekoliko usmerjena že zaradi same narave teh shem in kmetijske dejavnosti, ki jo subvencionirajo, to je kmetijska dejavnost, ki se na splošno izvaja z ekstenzivno pašo živali na površinah, ki niso primerne za poljedelstvo.
However, without explicit and sufficient targeting provisions direct aid may have the effect of subsidising other, more intensive animal farming methods. 
Vendar pa lahko neposredna pomoč brez izrecnih in ustreznih določb za usmerjanje subvencionira tudi druge, intenzivnejše načine živinoreje.
The Commission did not include a regional requirement in the implementing provisions for the schemes that would explicitly target aid to where it would be most effective. 
Komisija v izvedbene določbe shem ni vključila regionalne zahteve, ki bi pomoč izrecno usmerjala tja, kjer bi bila najbolj učinkovita.
Consequently, as currently implemented, the effects of the aids are diluted by being spread out across the entirety of Member States. 
Zato so učinki pomoči, kot se izvaja sedaj, oslabljeni, saj se uporablja na celotnem ozemlju držav članic.
The eligibility conditions for the basic24 suckler cow and ewe premiums, representing over 90 % of the budgeted funds for the two audited sectors, do not explicitly target the aids to vulnerable regions of a Member State. 
Pogoji za upravičenost do osnovnih premij za krave dojilje in ovce24, ki predstavljajo prek 90 % vseh sredstev, namenjenih za revidirana sektorja, pomoči ne usmerjajo izrecno na ranljive regije držav članic.
24 I.e. the suckler cow and ewe premiums described in Articles 111(1) and 101(1) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
24 Premije za krave dojilje in ovce, ki so opisane v členih 111(1) in 101(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
There are some components within the current schemes which are explicitly targeted, namely the basic goat premium, the ewe and goat supplementary premium and the additional suckler cow premium. 
Nekateri elementi v sedanjih shemah so izrecno usmerjeni: osnovna premija za koze, dodatna premija za ovce in koze ter dodatna premija za krave dojilje.
However, these components are not adequately focused on agricultural regions or are of limited financial value. 
Vendar pa ti elementi niso ustrezno osredotočeni na kmetijske regije ali pa imajo omejeno finančno vrednost.
Furthermore, they are being integrated into SPS. 
Poleg tega se zdaj vključujejo v SEP.
Eligibility conditions for the basic goat premium25 target direct aid to farmers in specific areas where production meets certain criteria. 
Pogoji za upravičenost do osnovne premije za koze25 usmerjajo neposredno pomoč h kmetom na posebnih območjih, kjer proizvodnja izpolnjuje določena merila.
However, Member States with relatively large goat herds have decided to fully integrate the goat premium into the SPS thereby reducing the potential for targeting this aid (see Box 3). 
Vendar pa so se države članice z razmeroma velikimi čredami koz odločile premijo za koze v celoti vključiti v SEP, s čimer se je zmanjšala možnost usmerjanja te pomoči (glej okvir 3).
The ‘ewe and goat supplementary premium’ targets certain regions and specific farming practices26. 
Dodatna premija za ovce in koze je usmerjena na določena območja in posebne načine kmetovanja26.
It is designed so as to only be paid ‘to farmers in areas where sheep and goat production constitutes a traditional activity or contributes significantly to the rural economy’. 
Zasnovana je tako, da se izplačuje le„kme-tom na območjih, kjer pomeni vzreja ovac in koz tradicionalno dejavnost ali pomembno prispeva k podeželskemu gospodarstvu“.
However, this premium, which amounted to 215 million euro in 2006, is in the process of disappearing as there is a tendency to fully integrate it into the SPS27. 
Vendar pa ta premija, ki je leta 2006 znašala 215 milijonov EUR, postopoma izginja zaradi težnje po njeni popolni vključitvi v SEP27.
In fact, for calendar year 2010, only Portugal and Finland have maintained this premium coupled. 
V koledarskem letu 2010 sta samo Portugalska in Finska ohranili to premijo v vezani obliki.
25 As is provided for in Article 101(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
25 V skladu s členom 101(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
26 Article 102 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
26 Člen 102 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
27 Decoupling by 50 % required by regulation as of the first year of SPS implementation; full decoupling of aids to these sectors in France and in Spain as of 2010. 
27 Uredba zahteva 50-odstotno nevezanost od prvega leta izvajanja SEP; Francija in Španija sta v celoti nevezano pomoč za ta sektor uvedli leta 2010.
BOX 3 MEMBER STATES DISCONTINUING THE USE OF TARGETED COMPONENTS OF THE AUDITED SCHEMES France, which has a population of over 1,3 million goats (representing 10 % of EU goat animals) decided to fully integrate the goat premium into the SPS as of 2006 and the ewe premium as of 2010. 
OKVIR 3 DRŽAVE ČLANICE, KI SO NEHALE UPORABLJATI USMERJENE ELEMENTE REVIDIRANIH SHEM Francija, ki ima več kot 1,3 milijona koz (kar pomeni 10 % vseh koz v EU), se je odločila, da bo premijo za koze v celoti vključila v SEP leta 2006, premijo za ovce pa leta 2010.
Spain, which accounts for 22 % of the total goat animals in the EU, also fully decoupled the premiums as of 2010. 
Španija, ki ima 22 % vseh koz v EU, se je prav tako odločila za uvedbo v celoti nevezanih premij od leta 2010.
The largest EU goat producer, Greece (around 38 % of the total goat population), had decided to fully integrate the goat premium into SPS upon its introduction. 
Grčija, največja proizvajalka koz v EU (okrog 38 % celotne populacije koz), se je odločila za popolno vključitev premije za koze v SEP že ob njeni uvedbi.
The additional premium for suckler cows also includes a targeting provision through being linked to convergence regions28. 
Dodatna premija za krave dojilje prav tako vključuje določbe za usmerjanje, saj je vezana na konvergenčne regije28.
However, such regions do not necessarily constitute agricultural regions where the keeping of suckler cows could be expressly linked to particular social and environmental impacts. 
Vendar pa te regije niso nujno kmetijske regije, kjer bi bilo rejo krav dojilj mogoče izrecno povezati z določenimi socialnimi in okoljskimi učinki.
The additional suckler cow premium amounted to 51 million euro in 2010 (down from 62,1 million euro in 2006), representing 5 % of the total for the audited schemes. 
Dodatna premija za krave dojilje je leta 2010 znašala 51 milijonov EUR (manj kot leta 2006, ko je znašala 62,1 milijona EUR), kar pomeni 5 % celotne vrednosti revidiranih shem.
The detailed amounts per measure and Member State are shown in Annex I. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SCHEMES IN MAINTAINING SPECIFIC PRODUCTION AND THUS AVOIDING NEGATIVE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 22. 
Natančni zneski po posameznih ukrepih in državah članicah so prikazani v Prilogi I. USPEŠNOST SHEM PRI OHRANJANJU OPREDELJENE PROIZVODNJE IN PREPREČEVANJU NEGATIVNIH SOCIALNIH, GOSPODARSKIH IN OKOLJSKIH UČINKOV 22.
The schemes were intended to sustain a certain level of specific production in vulnerable regions, and thus avoid negative social, economic and environmental consequences of the implied restructuring due to decoupling29. 
Namen shem je bil ohraniti določeno raven opredeljene proizvodnje v ranljivih regijah ter tako preprečiti negativne socialne, gospodarske in okoljske posledice prestrukturiranja, povezanega z uvajanjem nevezanih pomoči29.
These goals remain relevant in the Commission’s legislative proposals for the framework of the CAP in the period 2014–2030. 
Ti cilji ostajajo pomembni tudi v zakonodajnih predlogih Komisije za okvir SKP v obdobju 2014–202030.
Consequently, the audit examined whether the trends in the two sectors in the audited Member States differed significantly from those in Member States that had fully integrated the premiums into the SPS, and whether any difference could be attributed to the audited schemes. 
Pri reviziji je bilo zato preučeno, ali se trendi v teh dveh sektorjih v revidiranih državah članicah bistveno razlikujejo od trendov v državah članicah, ki so premije v celoti vključile v SEP, ter ali je mogoče razlike pripisati revidiranim shemam.
Overall, the number of suckler cows in Member States using partial implementation of SPS increased slightly31 (+ 2 %) between 2005 and 2010, while the number in decoupled Member States decreased by 6 %32. 
Na splošno se je število krav dojilj v državah članicah31, ki delno izvajajo SEP, med letoma 2005 in 2010 rahlo povečalo (za 2 %), medtem ko se je njihovo število v državah članicah32 z nevezano pomočjo zmanjšalo za 6 %.
However, the influence of the suckler cow premiums is not apparent from the general suckler cow trends in individual Member States. 
Vendar pa iz splošnih trendov na področju krav dojilj v posameznih državah članicah ni razviden vpliv premij za krave dojilje.
28 I.e. regions under the 'convergence' objective as used in the allocation of EU Structural Funds, corresponding to NUTS (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) level 2, where per capita GDP is less than 75 % of EU-25. 
28 To so regije v okviru konvergenčnega cilja, ki se uporablja pri dodeljevanju strukturnih skladov EU in ustreza NUTS (nomenklatura teritorialnih enot za statistiko) ravni 2, kjer je BDP na prebivalca nižji od 75 % BDP EU-25.
29 SEC(2008) 1885 of 20 May 2008, p. 
29 SEC(2008) 1885 z dne 20. maja 2008, str.
30 Stating that ‘by means of an implementing act, the Commission shall approve Member States’ decisions (i.e. those referred to in Article 39(3), or, where appropriate, in Article 39(4) (a) of the CAP post 2013 legislative proposals) where one of these needs in the region or sector concerned is demonstrated’. 
30 Tam je navedeno, da Komisija z izvedbenim aktom odobri odločitev držav članic (iz člena 39(3) ali, če je ustrezno, člena 39(4)(a) zakonodajnih predlogov SKP po letu 2013), kadar se v zadevni regiji ali sektorju pokaže ena izmed teh potreb.
31 Austria, Belgium, France, Portugal and Spain. 
31 Avstrija, Belgija, Francija, Portugalska in Španija.
32 Ireland and the United Kingdom. 
32 Irska in Združeno kraljestvo.
For example, in France, a Member State using partial implementation of SPS and which accounts for roughly 32 % of the total number of suckler cows, the herd was declining from 2001 to 2004; however, since 2004, suckler cow numbers started increasing and since 2008 have been relatively steady (see Graph 1). 
Na primer v Franciji, državi članici, ki delno izvaja SEP in ima približno 32 % vseh krav dojilj v EU, se je čreda med letoma 2001 in 2004 zmanj-ševala, po letu 2004 pa se je število krav dojilj začelo povečevati in je od leta 2008 razmeroma ustaljeno (glej diagram 1).
The decrease in the 2001–04 period occurred despite the existence of the suckler cow premiums and other direct aids to the beef sector. 
Do upada med letoma 2001 in 2004 je prišlo kljub obstoju premij za krave dojilje in drugih vrst neposredne pomoči v sektorju govejega mesa.
In contrast, Germany, a Member State which had fully decoupled the audited schemes and which accounts for roughly 6 % of the total suckler cow herd, experienced a declining trend from 2000 to 2004, when the suckler cow premiums were still available. 
Nasprotno pa je v Nemčiji, državi članici, ki je v celoti uvedla nevezana plačila iz revidiranih shem in ima približno 6 % skupne črede krav dojilj, prišlo do upada števila krav dojilj med letoma 2000 in 2004, ko so bile premije zanje še na voljo.
Since then, the number of suckler cows has stabilised/decreased at a slower rate, even after full implementation of SPS. 
Po tem obdobju se je število krav dojilj ustalilo oz. zmanjševalo počasneje, celo po začetku izvajanja SEP v celoti.
Existing suckler cow evolution - France (2000-10) 4 250 840 Existing suckler cow evolution - Germany (2000-10) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 19 GRAPH 1 SUCKLER COW TRENDS IN FRANCE AND GERMANY 2000-10 4 200 4 150 4 100 820 800 780 760 4 050 740 4 000 3 950 3 900 720 700 680 660 3 850 640 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Based on Eurostat data. 
DIAGRAM 1 GIBANJE ŠTEVILA KRAV DOJILJ V FRANCIJI IN NEMČIJI MED LETOMA 2000 IN 2010 4 250 4 200 4 150 4 100 4 050 4 000 3 950 3 900 3 850 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 840 820 800 780 760 740 720 700 680 660 640 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Gibanje obstoječega števila krav dojilj – Francija (2000–2010) Gibanje obstoječega števila krav dojilj – Nemčija (2000–2010) 19 Vir: na podlagi podatkov Eurostata. Posebno poročilo št.
Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 1 000 heads 1 000 heads 
11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP 1 000 glav 1 000 glav
Sheep numbers, which have been in a long-term decline, show no significant change in this trend for Member States implementing either full or partial SPS since 2005. 
Pri številu ovac, ki že dolgo upada, ni bistvene spremembe tega trenda po letu 2005 niti v državah članicah, ki SEP izvajajo v celoti, niti v tistih, ki jo izvajajo delno.
This decline has been so pronounced that the premiums from the audited schemes, available since the 1990s, have been unable to reverse it (see Graph 2). 
Ta upad je bil tako izrazit, da ga premije iz revidiranih shem, ki so na voljo od 1990-ih let, niso mogle obrniti (glej diagram 2).
Furthermore, the fact that four33 of the six Member States which had retained the 50 % coupling option for the ewe and goat premiums have decided to fully integrate them into the SPS and use instead Article 68 support for these sectors indicates that these premiums have not been considered to be totally effective (see Box 4). 
Poleg tega dejstvo, da so se štiri33 od šestih držav članic, ki so ohranile možnost 50-odstotne vezanosti premij za ovce in koze, odločile, da jih bodo v celoti vključile v SEP in za te sektorje namesto njih uporabljale podporo iz člena 68, kaže, da te premije ne veljajo za popolnoma uspešne (glej okvir 4).
The lack of a strong link between the animal premiums and animal numbers suggests that significant exogenous or contextual factors, particular to each Member State, exert a predominant influence on the evolution of animal numbers. 
Neobstoj močne povezave med premijami za živali in številom živali nakazuje, da na gibanje števila živali vplivajo predvsem zunanji dejavniki ali okoliščine, specifični za vsako državo članico.