natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Broadband, meaning faster, better quality access to the internet, is becoming increasingly important not only for business competitiveness, but also for helping social inclusion. 
Širokopasovna povezava, torej hitrejši in kakovostnejši dostop do medmrežja, je vse bolj pomembna za konkurenčnost podjetij in tudi za socialno vključenost.
As part of its Europe 2020 strategy, the EU has set targets for broadband, including fast broadband availability for all Europeans by 2020. 
EU je v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 določila cilje za širokopasovne povezave, med katerimi je tudi razpoložljivost hitrih širokopasovnih povezav za vse državljane EU do leta 2020.
To support these objectives, the EU has made some 15 billion euro available to Member States in the period 2014-2020. 
Za podporo tem ciljem je dala državam članicam na voljo približno 15 milijard EUR v obdobju 2014–2020.
We found that broadband coverage has generally been improving across the EU, but that the Europe 2020 targets will not all be achieved. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se pokritost s širokopasovnimi povezavami sicer po celotni EU izboljšuje, vendar pa cilji strategije Evropa 2020 ne bodo doseženi.
Rural areas, where there is less incentive for the private sector to invest, remain less well connected than cities, and take up of ultra-fast broadband is significantly behind target. 
Na podeželskih območjih, kjer je za zasebni sektor manj spodbud za naložbe, je še vedno manj tovrstnih povezav kot v mestih, število naročnin na ultra hitre širokopasovne povezave pa bistveno zaostaja za zastavljenimi cilji.
EN 2018 Special Report NO 13 Tackling radicalisation that leads to terrorism: the Commission addressed the needs of Member States, but with some shortfalls in coordination and evaluation (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
13 Posebno poročilo SL 2018 Radikalizacija, ki vodi v terorizem: Komisija je obravnavala potrebe držav članic, toda pri usklajevanju in vrednotenju je bilo nekaj pomanjkljivosti (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
AUDIT TEAM The ECAŐs special reports set out the results of its audits of EU policies and programmes, or of management-related topics from specific budgetary areas. 
REVIZIJSKA EKIPA Posebna poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča predstavljajo rezultate njegovih revizij politik in programov EU ali tem v zvezi z upravljanjem na posameznih področjih proračuna.
This performance audit was carried out by Audit Chamber V Financing and administration of the EU, headed by ECA Member Lazaros S. Lazarou. 
To revizijo smotrnosti je opravil revizijski senat V – Financiranje in upravljanje EU, ki ga vodi član Evropskega računskega sodišča Lazaros S. Lazarou.
The audit was led by ECA Member Jan Gregor, supported by Werner Vlasselaer, Head of Private Office and Bernard Moya Private Office Attach; Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Principal Manager; Mark Marshall, Head of Task; Alexandre-Kim Hug and Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand, Auditors. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Jan Gregor, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njegovega kabineta Werner Vlasselaer, ataše v njegovem kabinetu Bernard Moya, vodilni upravni uslužbenec Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, vodja naloge Mark Marshall ter revizorja Alexandre-Kim Hugé in Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand.
From left to right: Werner Vlasselaer, Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Mark Marshall, Bernard Moya, Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand, Jan Gregor. 
Od leve proti desni: Werner Vlasselaer, Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Mark Marshall, Bernard Moya, Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand in Jan Gregor
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. European Union (EU) Member States are responsible for national security, including the fight against terrorism. 
4 POVZETEK I. Države članice EU so odgovorne za svojo nacionalno varnost, kar vključuje boj proti terorizmu.
They are in charge of designing and implementing measures at national level that aim to tackle radicalisation, i.e. the phenomenon of people embracing extremist ideologies and behaviours which could lead them to commit acts of terrorism. 
Pristojne so za pripravo in izvajanje ukrepov na nacionalni ravni, katerih cilj je boj proti radikalizaciji, tj. pojavu, pri katerem ljudje sprejmejo ekstremistične ideologije in vedenje, ki bi lahko privedli do terorističnih dejanj.
As radicalisation is caused by several factors, a wide range of preventive actions are generally deployed to address the problem. 
Ker radikalizacijo povzroča več dejavnikov, se za reševanje problema običajno uporablja cela vrsta preventivnih ukrepov.
The CommissionŐs role is to support Member States in their efforts and help to ensure that good practices are exchanged. 
Naloga Komisije je, da podpira države članice pri njihovih prizadevanjih in pomaga pri izmenjavi dobrih praks.
To do so, the Commission draws on an increasingly wide range of EU funds. 
Pri tem uporablja vse širši nabor skladov EU.
Our audit examined whether the Commission manages this cross-cutting support well. 
Sodišče je pri reviziji preučilo, ali Komisija dobro upravlja to medsektorsko podporo.
In particular, we assessed whether: the Commission provides Member States with relevant support; the actions financed by the different EU funds are coordinated to make the most of any synergies; the Commission has put in place a framework to assess the effectiveness and value for money of its support. 
Ocenilo je zlasti, ali: Komisija daje ustrezno podporo državam članicam; so ukrepi, financirani iz različnih skladov EU, usklajeni, da se čim bolj izkoristi možna sinergija; je Komisija vzpostavila okvir za ocenjevanje uspešnosti in stroškovne učinkovitosti svoje podpore.
4 III. there were some shortfalls in coordination and evaluation. 
5 III. vendar je bilo pri usklajevanju in vrednotenju nekaj pomanjkljivosti.
Overall, we found that the Commission addressed the needs of Member States, but IV. 
Vzeto v celoti je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je Komisija obravnavala potrebe držav članic, IV.
The Commission promoted cooperation between Member States through relevant initiatives such as the Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN), the EU Internet Forum and the European Strategic Communications Network. 
Komisija je z različnimi pobudami, kot so Mreža za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji, Internetni forum EU in Evropska mreža za strateško komuniciranje, spodbujala sodelovanje med državami članicami.
V. The Commission coordinated its cross-cutting support, for example, by means of consultation between directorates-general when approving work programmes. This has resulted in synergies between its actions. 
V. Komisija je usklajevala svojo medsektorsko podporo, na primer s posvetovanji med generalnimi direktorati pri odobravanju delovnih programov, kar je privedlo do sinergije med njenimi ukrepi.
However, despite recent improvements, there is still scope to improve the coordination of Commission actions. 
Še vedno pa obstajajo možnosti za izboljšanje usklajevanja ukrepov Komisije, in to kljub nedavnim izboljšavam.
For example, the CommissionŐs overview of EU-funded actions in this area does not include those managed by Member States, which would be useful to make the most of potential synergies. We also 
Na primer, pregled ukrepov na tem področju, financiranih s sredstvi EU, ki ga je pripravila Komisija, ne vključuje ukrepov, ki so jih upravljale države članice, čeprav bi bilo to koristno za čim boljši izkoristek sinergije.
found that the RAN, one of the CommissionŐs main initiatives, was not used to its full potential to disseminate the results of successful EU-funded projects. 
da Mreža za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji, ki je ena glavnih pobud Komisije, ni bila popolnoma izkoriščena za razširjanje rezultatov uspešnih projektov, ki jih financira EU.
For example, it has not broken down the overall policy objectives into more specific and measurable objectives, and the funds that the Commission has used are not accompanied by indicators and targets designed to measure success in addressing radicalisation. 
Tako na primer ni razčlenila splošnih ciljev politike na bolj specifične in merljive cilje, za porabljena sredstva pa ni bilo kazalnikov in količinsko opredeljenih ciljev, s katerimi bi se meril uspeh pri odzivanju na radikalizacijo.
Moreover, the achievements of specific actions are often measured in terms of amount of activity rather than effectiveness. 
Poleg tega se dosežki posameznih ukrepov pogosto merijo kot količina dejavnosti in ne kot uspešnost.
As a result, there is a risk that useful lessons might not be disseminated or taken into account when the Commission designs actions or develops its policy further. 
Zato obstaja tveganje, da Komisija pri pripravi ukrepov ali nadaljnjem razvoju svoje politike ne bo razširjala ali upoštevala koristnih spoznanj.
On the basis of its findings, the ECA recommends that the Commission should: improve the framework for overall coordination of actions addressing radicalisation; increase practical support to practitioners and policymakers in Member States; and improve the framework for assessing results. 5 
Na podlagi svojih ugotovitev Računsko sodišče Komisiji priporoča, naj: izboljša okvir za splošno usklajevanje ukrepov za obravnavanje radikalizacije, poveča praktično pomoč za strokovnjake iz prakse in oblikovalce politik v državah članicah, izboljša okvir za ocenjevanje rezultatov. 6
INTRODUCTION The EU supports Member States in their efforts to combat terrorism 1. 
UVOD EU podpira države članice pri njihovem boju proti terorizmu 1.
Member States are responsible for their national security1. They have developed different approaches to counter-terrorism according to their evaluation of the risks. 
Države članice so odgovorne za svojo nacionalno varnost.1 V skladu s svojo oceno tveganja so razvile različne pristope k boju proti terorizmu.
The 2015 European Agenda on Security4 set out how the EU could support Member States in countering terrorism. 
Leta 2005 je bilo v Evropski agendi za varnost4 opredeljeno, kako bi lahko EU podpirala države članice v boju proti terorizmu.
It focused on the prevention of radicalisation and the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters (those returning to Europe after having joined terrorist groups in conflict zones). 
Agenda se osredotoča na preprečevanje radikalizacije in grožnjo, ki jo predstavljajo tuji teroristični bojevniki (tisti, ki se vračajo v Evropo, potem ko so bili člani terorističnih skupin na območjih konfliktov).
It emphasised the need to protect citizens and critical infrastructure better, and to address the fight against terrorism outside the EU. 
Poudarja potrebo po boljši zaščiti državljanov in kritične infrastrukture ter po boju proti terorizmu zunaj EU.
It underlined Article 4.2 of the Treaty on European Union states that national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State. 
Podčrtuje pomen kaznovanja teroristov in njihovih podpornikov ter onemogočanja njihovega dostopa do Člen 4(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji potrjuje, da nacionalna varnost ostaja v izključni pristojnosti vsake posamezne države članice.
Article 67 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union states that the Union shall endeavour to ensure a high level of security. 
V členu 67 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije je določeno, da si Unija prizadeva zagotoviti visoko raven varnosti.
Articles 82 to 89 provide for police and judicial cooperation. 
V členih od 82 do 89 je opredeljeno policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje.
The European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy, 30 November 2005, 14469/4/05, adopted on 15 December 2005. 
Strategija Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu, 30. november 2005, 14 469/4/05, sprejeta 15. decembra 2005.
6 1 2 3 4 COM(2015) 185 final of 28 April 2015 ŇThe European Agenda on SecurityÓ. 
7 1 2 3 4 COM(2015) 185 final z dne 28. aprila 2015 – Evropska agenda za varnost.
It also highlighted the need for better exchanges of information in order to track those engaged in terrorist activities. 
Poudarja tudi potrebo po boljši izmenjavi informacij zaradi sledenja osebam, vključenim v teroristične dejavnosti.
Various EU institutions and bodies are involved in EU counter-terrorism. 
V boj proti terorizmu so vključene razne institucije in organi EU.
Through its communications, the Commission contributes to the EU strategy adopted by the Council in the form of Council conclusions. 
Komisija s sporočili prispeva k strategiji EU, ki jo je sprejel Svet v obliki sklepov.
It also initiates legislative acts on combating terrorism for negotiation and adoption by the European Parliament and the Council5. It is responsible for the sound financial management of EU funds and for coordinating its various directorates-general and monitoring its agencies in providing support for Member States. 
Vlaga tudi predloge zakonodajnih aktov o boju proti terorizmu, o katerih razpravljata in jih sprejmeta Evropski parlament in Svet.5 Odgovorna je za dobro finančno poslovodenje sredstev EU in usklajevanje svojih generalnih direktoratov ter spremljanje agencij pri zagotavljanju podpore državam članicam.
The Commissioner for the Security Union works under the guidance of the First Vice-President and supports the work of the Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship in ensuring the CommissionŐs security response to terrorism. 
Komisar za varnostno unijo dela pod vodstvom prvega podpredsednika Komisije in pomaga komisarju za migracije, notranje zadeve in državljanstvo pri zagotavljanju varnostnega odziva Komisije na terorizem.
The role of the CouncilŐs Counter-Terrorism Coordinator is to follow up the overall implementation of the EUŐs counter-terrorism strategy and to ensure the EU plays an active role in the fight against terrorism. 
Naloga koordinatorja Sveta za protiterorizem je spremljanje izvajanja strategije EU za boj proti terorizmu kot celote in zagotavljanje aktivne vloge EU v tem boju.
The Commission deploys a wide range of actions to help Member States address radicalisation 4. 
Komisija uporablja širok nabor ukrepov za pomoč državam članicam pri odzivanju na radikalizacijo 4.
Addressing radicalisation is a key component of the fight against terrorism. 
Odzivanje na radikalizacijo je ključni del boja proti terorizmu.
The majority of suspects involved in the recent terrorist attacks in Europe were European citizens who had been radicalised6. 
Večina oseb, ki so osumljene, da so sodelovale v nedavnih terorističnih napadih v Evropi, so bili radikalizirani evropski državljani.6 Po mnenju Komisije v njenih sporočilih o podpiranju držav članic pri odzivanju na radikalizacijo, ki vodi v terorizem,7 je radikalizacija običajno rezultat kombinacije različnih dejavnikov.
The latest Commission Communication For example, Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism (OJ L 88, 31.3.2017, p. 
Na primer Direktiva (EU) 2017/541 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2017 o boju proti terorizmu (UL L 88, 31.3.2017, str. 6).
A European Agenda on Security. 
A European Agenda on Security.
State of Play: June 2017. 
State of Play: June 2017.
COM(2005) 313 final of 21 September 2005 ŇTerrorist recruitment: addressing the factors contributing to violent radicalisationÓ; COM(2013) 941 final of 15 January 2014 ŇPreventing radicalisation to terrorism and violent extremism: strengthening the EUŐs responseÓ; and COM(2016) 379 final of 14 June 2016 ŇSupporting the prevention of radicalisation leading to violent extremismÓ. 
COM(2005) 313 final z dne 21. septembra o novačenju v teroristične organizacije: obravnavanje dejavnikov, ki prispevajo k nasilni radikalizaciji; COM(2013) 941 final z dne 15. januarja 2014 – Preprečevanje radikalizacije, ki vodi v terorizem in nasilni ekstremizem: krepitev odziva EU; COM(2016) 379 final z dne 14. junija 2016 o spodbujanju preprečevanja radikalizacije, ki vodi v nasilni ekstremizem.
The Commission takes the view that supporting Member States in their fight against radicalisation is a multi-faceted and complex challenge which can only be met through a combination of actions across several policy areas and by bringing together stakeholders at local, regional, national and European levels8. These actions are financed by various funds such as the Internal Security Fund, the Horizon 2020 Programme, The Justice Programme, Erasmus+ and the European Social Fund (ESF). 
Komisija meni, da je podpiranje držav članic pri njihovem boju proti radikalizaciji večplasten in kompleksen izziv, ki ga je mogoče izvajati samo s kombinacijo ukrepov na več področjih in s povezovanjem deležnikov na lokalni, regionalni, nacionalni in evropski ravni.8 Ti ukrepi se financirajo iz različnih virov, kot so Sklad za notranjo varnost, program Obzorje 2020, program Pravosodje, program Erasmus+ in Evropski socialni sklad.
None of these funds has addressing radicalisation as a specific objective. 
Pri nobenem od teh skladov odziv na radikalizacijo ni poseben cilj.
The CommissionŐs diverse actions are managed by eight of its directorates-general, Europol, Eurojust and the Member States (see Annex). 
Različne ukrepe Komisije upravljajo osem generalnih direktoratov Komisije, Europol, Eurojust in države članice (glej Prilogo).
The CommissionŐs approach to supporting Member States in addressing radicalisation is shown in Figure 1. 
Pristop Komisije k podpiranju držav članic pri odzivanju na radikalizacijo je prikazan na sliki 1.
8 8 This approach is reinforced by the 2010 Internal Security Strategy and the 2015 European Agenda on Security. 
9 8 Ta pristop je podprt v strategiji za notranjo varnost iz leta 2010 in Evropski agendi za varnost iz leta 2015.
Figure 1 - How the Commission supports Member States in addressing radicalisation 9 Developing knowledge of radicalisation and sharing practices Countering terrorist propaganda Promoting inclusive and resilient societies Identifying and dealing with radicalised people Addressing radicalisation in countries outside Europe Source: ECA 6. 
Slika 1 – Kako Komisija podpira države članice pri odzivanju na radikalizacijo 10 Pridobivanje znanja o radikalizaciji in izmenjava dobrih praks Boj proti teroristični propagandi Odkrivanje radikaliziranih oseb in ravnanje z njimi Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče Odzivanje na radikalizacijo v državah zunaj Evrope Spodbujanje vključujoče in odporne družbe 6.
Horizon 2020 provides research grants for developing knowledge of radicalisation. 
Nepovratna sredstva za raziskave za pridobivanje znanja o radikalizaciji se zagotavljajo v okviru programa Obzorje 2020.
Research topics include contemporary radicalisation trends and the development of a comprehensive approach to violent radicalisation. 
Raziskovalne teme vključujejo sodobne trende radikalizacije in pripravo celovitega pristopa k nasilni radikalizaciji.
Good practices are exchanged through initiatives such as the Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) (see Box 1). 
Dobre prakse se izmenjujejo v okviru pobud, kot je Mreža za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji (glej okvir 1).
Online terrorist propaganda is countered, for example, through the EU Internet Referral Unit (EU IRU) based in Europol, the EU Internet Forum and the European Strategic Communications Network (see Box 2). 
Enota EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin v okviru Europola, internetni forum EU in Evropska mreža za strateško komuniciranje se borijo proti spletni teroristični propagandi.
10 Box 1 - Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) The RAN was established in 2011. 
11 Okvir 1 – Mreža za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji Mreža za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji je bila ustanovljena leta 2011.
It connects practitioners around Europe, such as psychologists, teachers, social workers, police, prison and probation officers, who work directly with those vulnerable to radicalisation, and with those who have already been radicalised. 
Povezuje strokovnjake iz prakse po Evropi, kot so psihologi, učitelji, socialni delavci, policisti, delavci v zaporih in svetovalci v probacijskih enotah, ki se ukvarjajo neposredno z osebami, ki so dovzetne za radikalizacijo ali so že radikalizirane.
It aims to help and empower front-line practitioners (rather than policymakers and academics) in countering radicalisation or reintegrating violent extremists by: - promoting exchanges of experience, e.g. at meetings and conferences; - encouraging the use of relevant practical tools; - disseminating information and expertise. 
Njen cilj je pomagati strokovnjakom, ki delajo neposredno v praksi (in ne snovalcem politike in teoretikom), in jih opolnomočati v boju proti radikalizaciji in ponovnem vključevanju nasilnih ekstremistov: - s spodbujanjem izmenjave izkušenj, npr. na sestankih in konferencah, - s spodbujanjem uporabe ustreznih praktičnih orodij, - z razširjanjem informacij in strokovnega znanja.
The RAN Centre of Excellence provides coordination and support for the RAN. 
Center odličnosti Mreže za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji zagotavlja koordinacijo in podpira Mrežo.
It uses its expertise to guide the nine RAN Working Groups (thematic groups in which practitioners meet to exchange ideas, knowledge and experiences), offer tailor-made support (e.g. workshops and training courses) to individual countries, and disseminate knowledge and practices. 
Njegove strokovne zmogljivosti se uporabljajo za usmerjanje devetih delovnih skupin Mreže za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji (tematskih skupin, v okviru katerih se srečujejo strokovnjaki iz prakse zaradi izmenjave idej, znanja in izkušenj), zagotavljanje podpore po meri za posamezne države (npr. delavnice in programi usposabljanja) ter razširjanje znanja in praks.
The Centre is managed by a contractor and financed by an ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ contract totalling Ű25 million for the 2015-2019 period. 
Center upravlja zunanji izvajalec na podlagi pogodbe, financira pa se iz Sklada za notranjo varnost – Policija.
Box 2 - Countering terrorist propaganda EU Internet Referral Unit (EU IRU) The EU IRU was set up on 1 July 2015 and is located within the European Counter Terrorism Centre (ECTC) at Europol. 
Okvir 2 – Boj proti teroristični propagandi Enota EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin Enota je bila vzpostavljena 1. julija 2015, deluje pa v okviru Evropskega centra za boj proti terorizmu pri Europolu.
It has a budget of Ű4.5 million for 2017. 
V letu 2017 je razpolagala s proračunom v višini 4,5 milijona EUR.
The EU IRU aims to counter online radicalisation and recruitment by terrorists by flagging online terrorist content and alerting the service providers that host it, such as YouTube (Google), Microsoft, Facebook and Twitter, by means of an assessment, that will enable them to decide whether to remove such content. 
Enota EU za prijavljanje sumljivih spletnih vsebin se bori proti spletni radikalizaciji in novačenju, ki ga izvajajo teroristi. Označuje spletne teroristične vsebine in nanje opozarja ponudnike spletnih storitev, kot so YouTube (Google), Microsoft, Facebook in Twitter, ter pripravlja ocene, ki jim omogočajo, da se odločijo, ali bodo te vsebine odstranili ali ne.
In agreement with Member States, it focuses on Islamist terrorist propaganda, which cuts across borders. 
Sporazumno z državami članicami se osredotoča na islamistično teroristično propagando, ki sega preko meja.
11 The EU IRU also provides expertise on internet based communication to support Member StatesŐ investigations and provides strategic analysis to identify terrorist threats. 
12 Enota zagotavlja tudi strokovno znanje o spletnem komuniciranju kot pomoč državam članicam pri preiskavah ter pripravlja strateške analize za odkrivanje terorističnih nevarnosti.
EU Internet Forum In December 2015 the Commission launched the EU Internet Forum financed by the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ. 
Internetni forum EU Decembra 2015 je Komisija vzpostavila Internetni forum EU, ki se financira iz Sklada za notranjo varnost – Policija.
By means of meetings and conferences, the Forum brings together governments, Europol, internet companies, the Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, the European Strategic Communications Network and the RAN. 
Forum z organiziranjem srečanj in konferenc povezuje vlade, Europol, internetna podjetja, koordinatorja za protiterorizem, Evropsko mrežo za strateško komuniciranje in Mrežo za ozaveščanje o radikalizaciji.