natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN 134 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 Initial recommendations (Paragraphs 119 to 123 of the Special Report) Overall assessment of actions taken (2000-2006 ex-post evaluations) Remaining or additional weaknesses (upcoming 2007-2013 ex-post evaluations) Commission’s reply Recommendation 3 Particular attention needs to be reserved to the choice of appropriate techniques for assessing and measuring the economic impact (...). DG REGIO used two macro-economic models and introduced counterfactual analysis as a method of impact evaluation (1). 
SL 134 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 Prvotno priporočilo (odstavki 119–123 posebnega poročila) Skupna ocena sprejetih ukrepov (naknadna vrednotenja za obdobje 2000–2006) Preostale ali dodatne slabosti (naslednja naknadna vrednotenja za obdobje 2007–2013) Odgovor Komisije Priporočilo 3 Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti izbiri GD REGIO je uporabil dva makroekonomska modela in kot metodo za vrednotenje učinka uvedel analizo nasprotnih dejstev (1).
The current practice of using macro-economic models derived GDP growth for measuring the success of Cohesion Policy should be comple­ mented by the use of social and environmental indicators. 
Trenutno prakso uporabe rasti BDP, ki izhaja iz makroekonomskih modelov, za merjenje uspeha kohezijske politike bi bilo treba dopolniti z uporabo socialnih in okoljskih kazalnikov.
DG REGIO agrees that macroeconomic models will continue to play an important role in understanding the effects of cohesion policy. 
GD REGIO se strinja, da bodo imeli makroekonomski modeli tudi v prihodnje pomembno vlogo pri razume­ vanju vplivov kohezijske politike.
DG REGIO is looking into the question which models are best suited to reflect the range of its policy objectives. 
GD REGIO raziskuje, kateri modeli bi najbolj odražali njegove številne cilje politik. primernih tehnik ocenjevanja in merjenja gospo­ darskega vpliva [...].
Recommendation 4 Greater emphasis needs to be placed on estab­ lishing linkages between the ex-post assessments and thematic studies and to ensure that results are consistent with each other. See Recommendation 1. 
Priporočilo 4 Več poudarka je treba nameniti vzpostavljanju Glej priporočilo 1.
Recommendation 5 A number of recommendations for future assessments more particularly for Objective 1 Regions may be made, namely: (a) there needs to be a specific focus on the reasons why private sector contributions to the structural funds projects differ markedly between Member States (...); This issue mainly concerns Regional Policy. 
Priporočilo 5 Za prihodnja ocenjevanja, posebno za regije Cilja 1, je mogoče dati več priporočil, namreč: (a) Posebej se je treba osredotočiti na razloge za To vprašanje se nanaša v glavnem na regionalno politiko.
DG REGIO carried out an assessment of the impact of Structural Funds on private sector spending, however, this was limited to investments in research and development. 
GD REGIO je izvedel oceno učinka strukturnih skladov na porabo zasebnega sektorja, vendar je bilo to omejeno na naložbe v raziskave in razvoj.
DG REGIO should continue to explore how private sector investment can be stimulated. (a) The available empirical evidence on the effects of support to enterprises, inside and outside the Commission, is still scarce. 
GD REGIO bi moral še naprej raziskovati, kako bi bilo mogoče spodbuditi zasebni sektor. (a) Razpoložljivih empiričnih dokazov o učinkih podpore podjetjem – tako znotraj kot zunaj Komisije – je še vedno malo.
DG REGIO will continue its efforts to add to the evidence. (b) another worthwhile topic to explore is whether there should be a shift in the future from grant expenditure to financial engineering measures, (...), which may prove to be more sustainable and efficient in the long term; In the 2007-2013 period, an emphasis was put on financial engineering techniques in the fields of venture capital, loans and interest rate subsidies and urban regeneration. 
GD REGIO si bo še naprej prizadeval za več dokazov. to, da se prispevki zasebnega sektorja struk­ turnim skladom med državami članicami izra­ zito razlikujejo [...]. (b) Še ena tema, ki jo je vredno raziskati, je, ali bi bilo v prihodnosti treba izvesti preusmeritev z odhodkov v obliki donacij na ukrepe finanč­ nega inženirstva, [...], ki so morda dolgoročno bolj trajnostni in učinkoviti. V obdobju 2007–2013 je bil poudarek na tehnikah finančnega inženiringa na področjih tveganega kapitala, subvencij posojil in obrestne mere ter obnove urbanih območij.
The Commission should further explore the potential for providing finance via instruments other than grants. (b) DG REGIO will continue its efforts to add to the evidence (see reply to previous paragraph). (c) greater attention needs to be given to the estab­ lishment of unit costs and benchmarks for various types of projects; DG REGIO set up a database of infrastructure unit costs but it is not yet in use. 
Komisija bi morala še dodatno raziskati možnosti za zagotavljanje financiranja iz drugih instru­ mentov, ne samo iz donacij. (b) GD REGIO si bo še naprej prizadeval za več dokazov (glej odgovor na prejšnji odstavek). (c) Večjo pozornost je treba posvetiti izračunu stroškov na enoto in določitvi meril uspešnosti za različne tipe projektov. GD REGIO je vzpostavil podatkovno zbirko o infrastrukturnih stroških na enoto, vendar se še ne uporablja.
DG REGIO should complete the unit costs database. 
GD REGIO bi moral dokončati podatkovno zbirko o infrastrukturnih stroških na enoto.
DG EMPL should encourage Member States to establish databases about training project unit cost and key features. (c) The ex-post evaluation 2000-2006 of the Cohesion Fund will enrich the current database with a substantial number of projects. 
GD EMPL bi moral države članice spodbujati k vzpo­ stavljanju podatkovnih zbirk o stroških na enoto pri projektih usposabljanja in ključnih značilno­ stih. (c) Naknadno vrednotenje kohezijskega sklada za obdobje 2000–2006 bo obogatilo sedanjo poda­ tkovno zbirko s številnimi projekti.
DG REGIO should expand its use of counter­ factual analysis and DG EMPL should introduce it. 
GD REGIO bi moral razširiti svojo uporabo analize nasprotnih dejstev, GD EMPL pa bi jo moral uvesti.
The Commission should support its use by Member States. 
Komisija bi morala spodbujati njeno uporabo v državah članicah.
DG REGIO agrees on the further expansion of the use of counterfactual analysis. 
GD REGIO se strinja z nadaljnjo razširitvijo uporabe analize nasprotnih dejstev.
DG EMPL works on counterfactuals is ongoing (see reply to paragraph 4.56). 
Delo GD EMPL v zvezi z analizo nasprotnih dejstev še poteka (glej odgovor na odstavek 4.56).
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 135 Initial recommendations (Paragraphs 119 to 123 of the Special Report) Overall assessment of actions taken (2000-2006 ex-post evaluations) Remaining or additional weaknesses (upcoming 2007-2013 ex-post evaluations) Commission’s reply (d) additional attention also needs to be given to the project application and approval process as the evaluators pointed out; DG REGIO commissioned a Workpackage on management and implementation systems which it intends to take into account for the design of the period starting in 2014. (e) there should be greater focus on internal evaluations by the relevant ministries or regional authorities in future ex-post assessments. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 135 Prvotno priporočilo (odstavki 119–123 posebnega poročila) Skupna ocena sprejetih ukrepov (naknadna vrednotenja za obdobje 2000–2006) Preostale ali dodatne slabosti (naslednja naknadna vrednotenja za obdobje 2007–2013) Odgovor Komisije (d) Dodatno pozornost je treba posvetiti tudi postopku projektnih vlog in odobritve projektov, kot so opozorili izvajalci vrednotenj. GD REGIO je naročil delovni paket o upravljav­ skih in izvajalskih sistemih, ki ga namerava upoštevati pri načrtovanju obdobja, ki se začne leta 2014. (e) Relevantna ministrstva ali regionalne oblasti bi morali pri prihodnjih naknadnih ocenjevanjih večjo pozornost nameniti notranjim vrednote­ njem.
Although mid-term evaluations were mandatory, Member States’ evaluations were mostly compliance-oriented rather than outputs-and outcomes-oriented. 
Čeprav so bila vmesna vrednotenja obvezna, so se države članice v svojih vrednotenjih usmerile predvsem na skladnost, namesto na izložke in izide.
The Commission should require Member States (e) In the current programming period the obligatory make performance driven internal evaluations, mid-term evaluation has been replaced by a needs-and, to this end, facilitate the exchange of good oriented process of ongoing evaluations. 
Komisija bi morala od držav članic zahtevati, naj (e) izvajajo notranja vrednotenja, usmerjena v uspeš­ nost, in v ta namen olajšati izmenjavo dobrih praks. V sedanjem programskem obdobju je obvezno vmesno vrednotenje nadomestil postopek nenehnih vrednotenj, usmerjen v potrebe.
See Commission's reply to paragraph 4.55. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 4.55.
EN 136 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 Recommendation 1 Initial recommendations Overall assessment of actions taken Remaining or additional weaknesses Commission’s reply To gain authority as a programme manager, the Commission should adapt its resources and its legal and financial instruments to the specificities of the development and management of an industrial programme: This recommendation has been partially imple­ mented. 
SL 136 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 Prvotno priporočilo Skupna ocena sprejetih ukrepov Preostale ali dodatne slabosti Odgovor Komisije Priporočilo 1 Če želi Komisija pridobiti avtoriteto kot upravite­ To priporočilo je bilo delno izvedeno.
There are a number of decisions that are important for the success of the programme which have not yet been taken (namely, a clear definition of strategic and operational objectives, and overall programme financing and cost-sharing models). 
Več odločitev, ki so pomembne za uspeh programa, še ni bilo sprejetih (namreč jasna opre­ delitev strateških in operativnih ciljev ter modeli za skupno financiranje programa in delitev stro­ škov).
The European Commission, being responsible for the management of the GNSS programmes, put in place the required legal and technical framework to implement it, taking into account the Court's recommen­ dations. (a) the quantity and expertise of its human resources should be commensurate with its task as programme manager; (a) The staff working on GNSS programmes at the Commission has increased from 13 persons in 2007 to 75 in March 2010. 
Evropska komisija, ki je pristojna za upravljanje programov GNSS, je uvedla potrebni pravni in tehnični okvir za njihovo izvajanje, pri čemer je upoštevala pripo­ ročila Sodišča. ljica programa, bi morala svoje vire ter pravne in finančne instrumente prilagoditi specifičnim značil­ nostim razvoja in upravljanja industrijskega programa: (a) število in strokovno znanje njenih človeških virov bi morala biti sorazmerna z njeno nalogo upraviteljice programa; (a) Število uslužbencev Komisije, ki delajo na programih GNSS, se je povečalo s 13 oseb leta 2007 na 75 marca leta 2010.
The next challenge will be to ensure continuity of human resources after 2013. 
Naslednji izziv bo zagotoviti kontinuiteto kadrovskih virov po letu 2013.
In the framework of the preparations for the new Multi­ annual Financial Framework (MFF), the Commission will present a new legislative proposal for further imple­ mentation of the Galileo and EGNOS programmes. 
Komisija bo v okviru pripravljanja novega večletnega finančnega okvira predstavila nov zakonodajni predlog za nadaljnje izvajanje programov Galileo in EGNOS.
It will include, inter alia, the framework for their governance and an updated definition of the budgetary resources needed. (b) an appropriate EU-ESA cooperation framework should be established; (b) The Commission has signed the EGNOS and Galileo Delegation Agreements with ESA expiring in the end of 2015. 
Ta bo med drugim vseboval okvir za njuno vodenje in posodobljeno opredelitev potrebnih proračunskih virov. (b) vzpostaviti bi bilo treba primeren okvir sodelo­ vanja med EU in ESA; (b) Komisija je z ESA podpisala sporazume o prenosu pooblastil za EGNOS in Galileo, ki se iztečejo konec leta 2015.
The Transport Council conclusions of March 2011, as well as the European Parliament Resolution of June 2011, both support the financing of the programmes from the EU budget. (c) the Commission should ensure it has the financial instruments to fund infrastructure (other than via grants) and to commit itself to bearing the yearly operating and replen­ ishment costs of this infrastructure over a long time horizon; (c) Whilst the Commission has estimated the mid-and long-term project costs, the sources of the necessary financing have not been secured. 
Ekstrapolacija proračuna programov brez poznavanja prihodnje finančne javne podpore ne zagotavlja ustrezne splošne slike za oblikovanje sklepov o skupnih neto finančnih stroških. (c) Komisija bi morala zagotoviti, da so ji na voljo finančni instrumenti za financiranje infrastruk­ ture (poleg financiranja z donacijami) in se zavezati, da bo na dolgi rok krila letne opera­ tivne stroške in stroške obnove te infrastruk­ ture; (c) Čeprav je Komisija ocenila srednje-in dolgo­ ročne stroške projekta, potrebni viri financi­ ranja še niso zagotovljeni.
Based on the Commission’s figures, the Court notes that these project costs could reach 20,4 billion euro up to 2030 and that future commercial revenues are expected to cover less than 10% of estimated annual operational costs. 
Sodišče na podlagi številčnih podatkov Komisije ugotavlja, da bi lahko ti stroški projekta znašali tudi 20,4 milijarde EUR do leta 2030 in da bodo prihodnji komercialni prihodki po pričakova­ njih pokrili manj kot 10 % ocenjenih letnih operativnih stroškov. (d) vodenje programa bi moralo upravitelju programa omogočati dosledno izvajanje nalog programa (opredeliti pričakovanja, dodeliti pristojnosti in preveriti uspešnost). (d) Sporazumi o prenosu pooblastil in načrti za upravljanje projektov, ki so bili sprejeti, upra­ vitelju programa zagotavljajo podlago za opravljanje njegovih nalog.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 137 Recommendation 2 Initial recommendations Overall assessment of actions taken Remaining or additional weaknesses Commission’s reply The Commission should urgently clarify the programme’s political objectives and translate them into strategic and operational objectives that will provide Galileo with a solid roadmap from now until beyond full deployment. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 137 naslednja vprašanja: Prvotno priporočilo Skupna ocena sprejetih ukrepov Preostale ali dodatne slabosti Odgovor Komisije Priporočilo 2 Komisija bi morala čim prej razjasniti politične cilje To priporočilo ni bilo izvedeno.
The programme’s political objectives should be urgently clarified and translated into strategic and operational objectives. 
Nujno bi bilo treba čim prej pojasniti politične cilje programa in jih prenesti v strateške in opera­ tivne cilje.
The Commission considers that the overall political and strategic objectives for the Galileo programme have been clarified with Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 (1). (a) How should Galileo be positioned as a commercial system? Is it required to break even financially or will it require continuing public-sector support? 
Komisija meni, da so bili splošni politični in strateški cilji programa Galileo pojasnjeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 683/2008 (1). programa in jih prenesti v strateške in operativne cilje, kar bo Galileu zagotovilo trden časovni načrt od sedaj do njegove popolne uvedbe.
The Commission has requested Member States to clarify the programme’s political objectives (particularly the Public Regulated Services and Safety-of-Life services) so that they can be translated into final strategic and operational objectives. 
Na primer: Komisija je od držav članic zahtevala, da pojasnijo politične cilje programa (zlasti javno regulirane storitve in storitve varovanja življenj), da jih bo mogoče prenesti v končne strateške in operativne cilje.
However, a common position has not yet been agreed and this is delaying important decisions for the detailed planning of the programme. 
Vendar še ni dogovora o skupnem stališču in zaradi tega pomembne odločitve za podrobno načrtovanje programa zamujajo. (a) Kakšen bi moral biti položaj Galilea kot komer­ cialnega sistema?
The operational objectives, as Public Regulated Service, Safety-of-Life service, Search and Rescue service and Commercial Service are currently under preparation and will be adopted in 2011 and 2012. 
Operativni cilji, kot so regulirane javne storitve, storitve varovanja življenj, storitve iskanja in reševanja ter komercialne storitve, se trenutno pripravljajo in bodo sprejeti v letih 2011 in 2012.
Recommendation 4 The Commission should ensure that the following issues are addressed: This recommendation has been partially imple­ mented. 
Priporočilo 4 Komisija bi morala poskrbeti, da se obravnavajo To priporočilo je bilo delno izvedeno.
In order to allow technical testing, the final speci­ fication of Galileo services needs to be fixed. 
Da se omogoči tehnično preizkušanje, je treba dokončno določiti Galileove storitve.
It will include, inter alia, the framework for their governance and an updated definition of the budgetary resources needed. (a) analysis, consolidation and validation of relevant and stable user requirements; (a) As user needs (namely Public Regulated Services, Safety-of-Life services and Search and Rescue services) have not yet been fixed, the Commission has not yet communicated them to ESA so that Mission Design Requirements can be finalised. 
Ta bo med drugim vseboval okvir za njuno vodenje in posodobljeno opredelitev potrebnih proračunskih virov. (a) analiza, konsolidacija ter validacija relevantnih in nespremenljivih uporabniških zahtev; (a) Ker uporabniške potrebe (namreč javno regu­ lirane storitve, storitve varovanja življenj ter storitve iskanja in reševanja) še niso bile dolo­ čene, jih Komisija še ni sporočila ESA, da bi ta lahko dokončala Mission Design Requirements.
The legal and regulatory framework should be completed, including a third-party liability policy. (b) development of enabling actions (such as the necessary legal and regulatory framework). (b) The Public Regulated Services regulation is currently being debated at the European Parliament. 
Treba je dokončati pravni in ureditveni okvir, vključno s politiko odgovornosti tretje strani. (b) razvoj ustreznih ukrepov (kot je potreben pravni in zakonski okvir). (b) Trenutno poteka v Evropskem parlamentu razprava o uredbi o javno reguliranih storitvah.
(1) Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo). 
(1) Uredba (ES) št. 683/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o nadaljevanju izvajanja evropskih satelitskih navigacijskih programov (EGNOS in Galileo).
The detailed regulations are currently under preparation and will be adopted by the end of 2011 and 2012. 
Trenutno se pripravljajo natančne uredbe, ki bodo spre­ jete do konca leta 2011 in 2012.
EN 140 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S INTRODUCTION 5.1. ThischapterpresentstheCourt'sspecificassessmentof External aid, Development and Enlargement, which comprises policy areas: 19 — External relations, 21 — Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States (1), 22 — Enlargement, and 23 — Humanitarian aid. 
SL 140 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A UVOD 5.1 Vtempoglavjujepredstavljenaposebnaocenazunanje pomoči, razvoja in širitve, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče in zajema naslednja področja politike: 19 – zunanji odnosi, 21 – razvoj in odnosi z afriškimi, karibskimi in pacifiškimi državami (drža­ vami AKP)(1), 22 – širitev ter 23 – humanitarna pomoč.
Key information on the activities covered and the spending in 2010 is provided in Table 5.1. 
Ključne informacije o zajetih dejavnostih in porabi v letu 2010 so predstavljene v tabeli 5.1.
The chapter also reports on the response of the Commission to the recommendations set out in two special reports. 
V poglavju je tudi poročilo o odgovorih Komisije na priporočila iz dveh posebnih poročil.
Specific characteristics of the policy group 5.2. ExternalrelationsandDevelopmentexpenditurewas implemented in 2010 by the EuropeAid Cooperation Office (EuropeAid) (2) and also by the Directorate-General for External Relations (DG RELEX) (3). 
Posebne značilnosti te skupine politik 5.2 Leta 2010 sta odhodke na področju zunanjih odnosov in razvoja izvrševala Urad za sodelovanje EuropeAid (Euro­ peAid) (2) in Generalni direktorat za zunanje odnose (GD RELEX) (3).
Enlargement expenditure was imple­ mented by the Directorate-General for Enlargement (DG ELARG), and Humanitarian aid, including food aid, by the Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid (DG ECHO). 
Odhodke na področju širitve je izvrševal Generalni direktorat za širitev (GD ELARG), odhodke na področju huma­ nitarne pomoči, vključno s pomočjo v hrani, pa Generalni direktorat za humanitarno pomoč (GD ECHO).
Most of the expenditure managed by the four DGs is implemented on the basis of pre-financing payments, which only require compliance with a limited number of conditions, while interim and final payments are conditional upon submission and validation of expenditure actually incurred for the project and are therefore in general subject to greater risks than pre-financing payments. 
5.3 Večina odhodkov, ki jih upravljajo ti štirje generalni direktorati, se izvršuje kot plačila predfinanciranja, za katera se zahteva izpolnjevanje samo omejenega števila pogojev, medtem ko je pogoj za vmesna in končna plačila, da se pred­ ložijo in potrdijo dejanski odhodki za projekt, zato je pri njih na splošno večje tveganje kot pri plačilih predfinanciranja.
Expenditure implemented by EuropeAid relates to: (a) development assistance to, and economic cooperation with, countries in Asia, Latin America and ACP States; (b) European neighbourhood policy, including the strategic partnership with Russia; (c) thematic programmes, including food security, non-state actors and local authorities, environment, health and education, democracy and human rights. _____________ (1) Aid provided through the European Development Funds is reported separately as it is not financed from the General Budget. 
EuropeAid 5.4 EuropeAid izvršuje odhodke za: (a) razvojno pomoč državam v Aziji, Latinski Ameriki in državam AKP ter gospodarsko sodelovanje z njimi; (b) evropsko sosedsko politiko, vključno s strateškim partner­ stvom z Rusijo; (c) tematske programe, ki vključujejo varnost preskrbe s hrano, nedržavne udeležence in lokalne organe, okolje, zdravje in izobraževanje, demokracijo ter človekove pravice. _____________ (1) O pomoči, zagotovljeni prek evropskih razvojnih skladov, se poroča posebej, saj se ne financira iz splošnega proračuna.
(2) As of 1 January 2011, EuropeAid and the Directorate-General for Development (DG DEV) merged under the new name of Direc­ torate-General for Development and Cooperation — EuropeAid (DG DEVCO). 
(2) Od 1. januarja 2011 sta EuropeAid in Generalni direktorat za razvoj združena in se po novem imenujeta Generalni direktorat za razvoj in sodelovanje – EuropeAid (GD DEVCO).
(3) As of 1 January 2011, DG RELEX ceased to exist and was, to a large extent, integrated into the European External Action Service (EEAS). 
(3) 1. januarja 2011 je GD RELEX nehal obstajati. Velik del tega gene­ ralnega direktorata je bil vključen v Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje (ESZD).
In addition, a new service was created to manage the Foreign Policy Instruments (FPI). 
Poleg tega je bila ustanovljena nova služba za upravljanje instrumentov zunanje politike.