natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These intrinsic difficulties make it more important for the Commission to implement a robust and comprehensive set of performance indicators, and to ensure evaluation was optimally scheduled. 
Zaradi teh notranjih težav je še pomembneje, da Komisija uporablja trden in izčrpen sklop kazalnikov uspešnosti ter da zagotovi, da je vrednotenje načrtovano v optimalnem času.
28 RECOMMENDATION 2  MONITORING The Commission should ensure that programmes are monitored in a way that provides it, so far as possible, with useful information on their effects. 
28 PRIPOROČILO 2  SPREMLJANJE Komisija bi morala zagotoviti, da se programi spremljajo tako, da v največji možni meri nudijo koristne informacije o njihovih učinkih.
Such information should look beyond individual projects and assist in forming a view of a programme as a whole in a way which takes account of its announced objectives. 
Takšne informacije bi morale presegati posamezne projekte in pomagati pri oblikovanju pregleda nad programom kot celoto na način, ki upošteva njegove napovedane cilje.
RECOMMENDATION 3  EVALUATION Evaluation of programmes should take place in a way which maximises its usefulness as a source of “feedback” information which makes it possible to improve spending programmes. 
PRIPOROČILO 3  VREDNOTENJE Vrednotenje programov bi se moralo izvajati tako, da je kar najbolj koristno kot vir ”povratnih” informacij, ki omogoča izboljšanje programov porabe.
The Commission should consider making more use of “longitudinal” evaluation – looking at the impact of key categories of projects through successive spending frameworks. 
Komisija bi morala razmisliti o tem, da bi v večji meri uporabljala ”longi-tudinalno” vrednotenje – spremljanje učinka ključnih kategorij projektov v zaporednih okvirih porabe.
The reports that the Commission has obtained on Member State programmes might form an appropriate framework for this. 
Ustrezen okvir za to lahko nudijo poročila, ki jih prejme Komisija o programih držav članic.
ADMINISTERING THE SCHEME 52. The Court’s work suggests that total costs of preparing proposals, reporting on projects and of administration were equivalent to the total funds transferred to projects over the period 2003-2006. 
Revizija, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, kaže, da so bili skupni stroški priprave predlogov, poročanja o projektih in administracije enaki skupnemu znesku, razdelje-nemu projektom v obdobju 2003–2006.
Taking account of future disbursements and administrative costs, the total of these three types of cost can be expected to be more than one-sixth of the sums disbursed. 
Ob upoštevanju prihodnjih razdelitev sredstev in administrativnih stroškov je moč pričakovati, da bodo te tri vrste stroškov skupno znašale več kot šestino razdeljenih sredstev.
Although the European Commission runs many schemes with a similar design to IEE, it does not have a framework for assessing their administrative costs. 
Čeprav Evropska komisija izvaja številne sheme s podobno zasnovo, kot jo ima IEE, nima okvira za ocenjevanje njihovih administrativnih stroškov.
It is not therefore possible readily to compare the administrative costs of IEE with those of other schemes. 
Zato administrativnih stroškov IEE ni možno zlahka primerjati s stroški drugih programov.
29 RECOMMENDATION 4  MANAGING COSTS The Commission should more systematically record and analyse information on the administrative cost of programmes (considering indicators such as cost/euro disbursed, and cost/proposal appraised). “Cost” should include costs borne by beneficiaries, not just those borne by the Commission. 
29 PRIPOROČILO 4  STROŠKI UPRAVLJANJA Komisija bi morala bolj sistematično evidentirati in analizirati informacije o administrativnih stroških programov (razmisliti o kazalnikih, kot so strošek/razdeljen euro in strošek/ocenjeni predlog). ”Stroški” bi morali zajemati tudi stroške upravičencev in ne samo stroške Komisije.
The Commission should use this information to compare programmes and identify and spread best practice. 
Komisija bi morala te informacije uporabiti za primerjavo programov ter opredelitev in širjenje najboljše prakse.
The Executive Agency has had a positive impact on client satisfaction: participants (and particularly, project coordinators) prefer dealing with the Agency to dealing with the Commission. 
Izvajalska agencija je pozitivno vplivala na zadovoljstvo strank: udeleženci (zlasti koordinatorji projektov) raje sodelujejo z agencijo kot s Komisijo.
This report was adopted by the Court of auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 4 September 2008. 
To poročilo je sprejelo Računsko sodišče v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju 4. septembra 2008.
STEER ALTENER SAVE OVERVIEW OF THE VERTICAL KEY ACTIONS AND THE RELATED TARGET AREAS OF COOPENER 31 FIELD VERTICAL KEY ACTIONS TARGET AREAS TITLE TITLE ENERGY POLICIES, LEGISLATION AND MARKET CONDITIONS FOR ENABLING POVERTY ALLEVIATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES The energy policy chain, from development to promotion and implementation Pro-poor energy regulations, addressing sustainability, targets, and decentralised generation Energy planning for urban, peri-urban and rural areas Financing, investments and support schemes for energy sector programmes and projects, with particular emphasis on SMEs Promoting best practise in energy services to meet the needs of the poor STRENGTHENING LOCAL ENERGY EXPERTISE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Training and networking for energy policy makers, regulators, and planners Training, networking, mobility an study tours for energy professionals Strengthening existing Energy Centres, Agencies and Industry Associations Source: Intelligent Energy – Europe 2003-2006 – Global Work Programme for the years 2003-2006. 
STEER ALTENER SAVE PREGLED KLJUČNIH VERTIKALNIH UKREPOV IN Z NJIMI POVEZANIH CILJNIH PODROČIJ ZA COOPENER 31 PODROČJE KLJUČNI VERTIKALNI UKREPI CILJNA PODROČJA NAZIV NAZIV ENERGETSKE POLITIKE, ZAKONODAJA IN TRŽNE RAZMERE, KI OMOGOČAJO ZMANJŠANJE REVŠČINE V DRŽAVAH V RAZVOJU veriga energetske politike, od razvoja do spodbujanja in izvajanja energetski predpisi v korist revnih, ki obravnavajo trajnost, cilje in decentralizirano proizvodnjo energetsko načrtovanje za mestna, primestna in podeželska območja sheme financiranja, naložb in podpore za programe in projekte energetskega sektorja s posebnim poudarkom na MSP spodbujanje najboljših praks pri energetskih storitvah za zadovoljevanje potreb revnih KREPITEV LOKALNEGA STROKOVNEGA ZNANJA NA PODROČJU ENERGETIKE V DRŽAVAH V RAZVOJU usposabljanje in mreženje za oblikovalce energetske politike, zakonodajalce in načrtovalce usposabljanje, mreženje, mobilnost in študijski obiski za zaposlene v energetiki krepitev obstoječih energetskih centrov, agencij in industrijskih združenj Vir: Inteligentna energija za Evropo 2003–2006 – globalni delovni program za leta 2003–2006.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS ON INTELLIGENT ENERGY 20032006 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE NA POSEBNO POROČILO EVROPSKEGA RAČUNSKEGA SODIŠČA O INTELIGENTNI ENERGIJI 20032006
33 SUMMARY I. IEE is intended to support the European Union’s policies in the field of energy as laid down in the Green Paper on Security of Energy Supply, the White Paper on Transport and other related Community legislation making a balanced contribution to achieving the general objectives of security of energy supply, competitiveness, and environmental protection (Art. 1 of the programme Decision). 
33 POVZETEK I. Namen programa Inteligentna energija za Evropo (IEE) je podpreti politiko Evropske unije na področju energetike, kot je določeno v Zeleni knjigi o zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo, Beli knjigi o prometu in v drugi, s tem povezani zakonodaji Skupnosti, ki uravnoteženo prispeva k doseganju splošnih ciljev, in sicer zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo, konkurenčnosti in varstva okolja (člen 1 odločbe o programu).
First indent The IEE programme’s function is essentially a catalytic one, where comparatively small amounts of funding are provided to trigger much larger investments in the future. 
Prva alinea Funkcija programa IEE je predvsem spodbuje-valna, pri čemer so razmeroma majhna sredstva predvidena za sprožitev precej večjih naložb v prihodnosti.
The selection of priority areas is inevitable when dealing with a sector as wide as energy. 
Pri tako širokem sektorju, kot je energetika, je izbira prednostnih področij neizogibna.
The scope and objectives of the IEE1 Programme were defined by the Parliament and the Council and structured on the basis of four specific fields. 
Parlament in Svet sta opredelila obseg in cilje programa IEE1, sestavljenega iz štirih posebnih področij.
The decision on IEE1 refers to a number of specific communications relevant to each of the four programme fields, and each of these documents contains a list of important areas of action1. 
Odločba o programu IEE1 se sklicuje na številna posebna sporočila, ki zadevajo vsako od štirih področij programa. Vsak od teh dokumentov vsebuje seznam pomembnih področij delovanja1.
The Commission considers that the planning of the programme, which was designed to address the policy areas defined in the legislation, represents an acceptably high standard given the inherent constraints of a policy instrument of this nature. 
Komisija meni, da načrtovanje programa, ki se nanaša na področja politike, določena v zakonodaji, pomeni zadovoljivo visok standard glede na omejitve, ki so del takega instrumenta politike.
Second indent IEE1 is a programme with a wide scope for addressing sustainable energy in all sectors of society as defined in the decision of the Parliament and the Council. 
Druga alinea IEE1 je program s širokim obsegom za obravnavanje trajnostne energije v vseh družbenih sektorjih, kot je določeno v odločbi Parlamenta in Sveta.
The Commission considers that the monitoring scheme was appropriate. 
Komisija meni, da je bila shema spremljanja ustrezna.
It is hardly feasible to introduce monitoring at a higher aggregated level given the difficulty to isolate causal links between the programme results as catalyst and macro-economic trends such as the EU’s energy dependency. 
Uvedba spremljanja na višji skupni ravni skoraj ni izvedljiva, ker je težko izolirati vzročne zveze med spodbujevalnimi rezultati programa in makroekonomskimi trendi, kot je energetska odvisnost Evropske unije.
The Commission considers that this does not compromise the overall quality and design of the IEE programme. 
Komisija meni, da to ne ogroža splošne kakovosti in zasnove programa IEE.
The growth in demand for energy agencies and their long term financing by public authorities are strong indicators that such agencies make a significant impact. 
Vse večje povpraševanje po agencijah za energijo in njihovo dolgoročno financiranje s strani javnih organov sta dobra pokazatelja, da imajo take agencije znaten vpliv.
Concerning the timing of programme evaluations, the IEE is a rolling programme, with experience from the past programmes feeding into subsequent ones. As such, evaluation results are used systematically in the design and drafting of the legislative proposals for subsequent programmes. 
Kar zadeva časovni razpored vrednotenj programa, je IEE tekoči program, pri čemer se izkušnje preteklih programov uporabljajo pri novejših. Tako se rezultati vrednotenja sistematično uporabljajo pri oblikovanju in zasnovi zakonodajnih predlogov za novejše programe.
1 For example, the White paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan [COM(1997) 599 final of 26/11/1997] contains four activity areas and 22 specific actions for the field renewable energies alone; the Communication from the Commission, entitled: “Action Plan to improve energy efficiency in the European Community” [COM(2000) 247 of 26/04/2000] puts forward actions in all sectors and in 15 main areas. 
1 Tako na primer Bela knjiga za strategijo in akcijski načrt Skupnosti [COM(1997) 599 konč. z dne 26. novembra 1997] vsebuje štiri področja delovanja in 22 posebnih ukrepov samo za področje obnovljivih virov energije; Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom ”Akcijski načrt za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti v Evropski skupnosti” [COM(2000) 247 z dne 26. aprila 2000] predlaga ukrepe v vseh sektorjih in na 15 glavnih področjih.
In 2006, this approach was confirmed by the European Parliament’s Opinion on the Green Paper on Energy Efficiency which sets forth over 100 recommendations (European Parliament Report P6_A(2006)0160 of 03.05.2006 and Commission’s communication of 19 October 2006 on an Action Plan for Energy Efficiency which defines six areas, ten priorities and 75 cost-effective actions chosen on the basis of an impact assessment). 
Leta 2006 je Evropski parlament ta pristop potrdil v svojem mnenju o Zeleni knjigi o energetski učinkovitosti, ki vsebuje več kot 100 priporočil (Poročilo Evropskega parlamenta P6_A(2006) 0160 z dne 3. maja 2006 in sporočilo Komisije z dne 19. oktobra 2006 o akcijskem načrtu za energetsko učinkovitost, ki določa šest področij, deset prednostnih nalog in 75 stroškovno uspešnih ukrepov, izbranih na podlagi ocene učinka).
34 Third indent The Court adds costs incurred by the Commission and the Executive Agency together with additional costs estimated by beneficiaries. 
34 Tretja alinea Sodišče upošteva stroške, ki jih imata Komisija in izvajalska agencija, skupaj z dodatnimi stroški, ki jih ocenijo upravičenci.
These last costs are of a very different nature and therefore should be considered separately: Preparing a proposal is an investment in planning a sound and competitive project. 
Ti zadnji stroški so bistveno drugačni, zato jih je treba obravnavati ločeno: pripravljanje predloga je naložba v načrtovanje trdnega in konkurenčnega projekta.
Project reporting is a co-financed contractual obligation which provides the basis for disseminating the results to stakeholders. 
Poročanje o projektu je sofinancirana pogodbena obveznost, na podlagi katere se rezultati posredujejo zainteresiranim stranem.
Programme management is carried out only by the Commission and Executive Agency. 
Upravljanje programa izvajata samo Komisija in izvajalska agencija.
In the IEE case, programme management costs also include investment in the establishment of an Executive Agency which will bring benefits and cost-savings in the future. 
V primeru IEE stroški upravljanja programa vključujejo tudi naložbo v ustanovitev izvajalske agencije, ki bo zagotovila koristi in prihranila stroške v prihodnosti.
The participants’ costs of preparing proposals are estimated on the basis of an extrapolation from a survey. The Court’s survey did not define the nature of the costs to be taken into account, nor a method for determining them The 29 % of those approached who replied were not asked to provide accounting data, and their replies were not audited. 
Stroški, ki jih imajo udeleženci s pripravljanjem predlogov, so ocenjeni na podlagi ekstrapolacije iz raziskave. V raziskavi Sodišča nista opredeljeni narava stroškov, ki jih je treba upoštevati, in metoda za njihov izračun. Od 29 % sodelujočih pri raziskavi se niso zahtevali računovodski podatki, poleg tega njihovi odgovori niso bili revidirani.
The replies will therefore necessarily be very approximate and extrapolations from them unreliable. 
Odgovori so zato nujno zelo približni, njihove ekstrapolacije pa nezanesljive.
V. First indent The Commission considers that the IEE programme clearly focuses on the main priority objectives of EU energy policy, namely (1) managing demand (decoupling consumption from growth), and (2) increasing the share of renewable energy in the EU final energy consumption. 
V. Prva alinea Komisija meni, da se program IEE jasno osredotoča na glavne prednostne cilje energetske politike EU, in sicer (1) upravljanje povpraševanja (ločevanje porabe od rasti) in (2) vse večji delež obnovljive energije v končni porabi energije v EU.
The work programme was designed to address the policy areas defined in the legislation. 
Namen delovnega programa je bil obravnavati področja politike, določena v zakonodaji.
It is up to the proposers to convincingly predict their expected results, and up to the Commission to decide on the basis of the fully costed project proposal if the proposed approach and expected results fit in a cost effective manner with the Community’s policy objectives. 
Predlagatelji morajo prepričljivo napovedati pričakovane rezultate, Komisija pa mora na podlagi stroškovno popolno ovrednotenega predloga projekta odločiti, ali predlagani pristop in pričakovani rezultati stroškovno učinkovito izpolnjujejo cilje politike Skupnosti.
Second indent Monitoring of the programme is done on a project basis, allowing their impacts to be determined with regard to their objectives. 
Druga alinea Spremljanje programa poteka na podlagi projektov, pri čemer se lahko vplivi ugotavljajo glede na cilje teh projektov.
Monitoring costs should remain proportionate and not add significantly to the costs of running the programme. 
Stroški spremljanja morajo ostati sorazmerni in ne smejo bistveno povečevati stroškov izvajanja programa.
Third indent The Commission intends to implement the recommendation regarding the evaluation of programmes. 
Tretja alinea Komisija namerava izvajati priporočilo v zvezi z vrednotenjem programov.
A new study is being launched as a Tender under the 2008 IEE Work Programme, and this will be carried out on a longitudinal basis. 
V skladu z javnim razpisom v okviru delovnega programa IEE za leto 2008 se izvaja nova študija, ki bo potekala longitudinalno.
35 Fourth indent Working documents to the preliminary draft budget each year provide breakdowns of administrative costs of the Directorate General’s activities and of each executive agency2. 
35 Četrta alinea Delovni dokumenti k predhodnemu predlogu proračuna vsako leto zagotavljajo razčlenitev administrativnih stroškov dejavnosti Generalnega direktorata in vsake izvajalske agencije2.
Since the 2008 procedure, this document also includes at the request of the European Parliament the percentage of the programmes’ budget used by the executive agency to operate. 
Po postopku iz leta 2008 ta dokument na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta vključuje tudi odstotek proračuna programov, ki ga izvajalska agencija porabi za delovanje.
For those executive agencies using the Commission’s IT accounting system, ABAC, to support their own accounting systems, the Commission will offer a facility for allocating the agency’s expenditure to each of its activities. 
Za izvajalske agencije, ki uporabljajo računalniški računovodski sistem Komisije ABAC za podporo svojih računovodskih sistemov, bo Komisija zagotovila funkcijo za dodeljevanje odhodkov agencije za vsako od njenih dejavnosti.
They will then be in a better position to report on costs, including those for administration. 
Tako bodo lahko bolje poročale o stroških, vključno z administrativnimi.
It is planned to offer this facility to certain agencies as from the 2009 financial year, and to subsequently extend it to others. 
Načrtuje se, da bo ta funkcija nekaterim agencijam ponujena v proračunskem letu 2009 ter nato razširjena na druge.
The Commission does not consider that costs borne by participants can be assimilated to administrative costs of programmes. 
Komisija meni, da stroškov sodelujočih ni mogoče izenačiti z administrativnimi stroški programov.
The extra burden on both beneficiary and Commission of collecting and checking information on the costs to the beneficiary of preparing proposals is currently not justified. 
Dodatno breme, naloženo upravičencu in Komisiji z zbiranjem in preverjanjem informacij o stroških, ki jih ima upravičenec zaradi priprave predlogov, zdaj ni upravičeno.
AUDIT FINDINGS 17. 
REVIZIJSKE UGOTOVITVE 17.
The programme’s function is essentially a catalytic one, where comparatively small amounts of funding are provided to trigger much larger investments in the future. 
Funkcija programa je predvsem spodbuje-valna, pri čemer so razmeroma majhna sredstva predvidena za sprožitev precej večjih naložb v prihodnosti.
The scope and objectives of the IEE 1 Programme were defined by the Parliament and the Council and structured on the basis of four specific fields. 
Parlament in Svet sta opredelila obseg in cilje programa IEE1, sestavljenega iz štirih posebnih področij.
The decision on IEE 1 is referring to a number of specific communications relevant to each of the four programme fields, and each of these documents contains a list of important areas of action.3 The Commission considers that the IEE programme clearly focuses on the main priority objectives of EU energy policy, namely (1) managing demand (decoupling consumption from growth), and (2) increasing the share of renewable energy in the EU final energy consumption. 
Odločba o programu IEE1 se sklicuje na številna posebna sporočila, ki zadevajo vsako od štirih področij programa. Vsak od teh dokumentov vsebuje seznam pomembnih področij delovanja.3 Komisija meni, da se program IEE jasno osredotoča na glavne prednostne cilje energetske politike EU, in sicer (1) upravljanje povpraševanja (ločevanje porabe od rasti) in (2) vse večji delež obnovljive energije v končni porabi energije v EU.
First indent The work programme was designed to address the policy areas defined in the legislation. 
Prva alinea Namen delovnega programa je bil obravnavati področja politike, določena v zakonodaji.
The selection procedure provides assurance that the supported projects will contribute most effectively to the policy objectives. 
Postopek izbire zagotavlja, da bodo podprti projekti najučinkoviteje prispevali k ciljem politike.
3 For example, the White paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan [COM(1997) 599 final of 26/11/1997] contains four activity areas and 22 specific actions for the field renewable energies alone; the Communication from the Commission, entitled: “Action Plan to improve energy efficiency in the European Community” [COM(2000) 247 of 26/04/2000] puts forward actions in all sectors and in 15 main areas. 
3 Tako na primer Bela knjiga za strategijo in akcijski načrt Skupnosti [COM(1997) 599 konč. z dne 26. novembra 1997] vsebuje štiri področja delovanja in 22 posebnih ukrepov samo za področje obnovljivih virov energije; Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom ”Akcijski načrt za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti v Evropski skupnosti” [COM(2000) 247 z dne 26. aprila 2000] predlaga ukrepe v vseh sektorjih in na 15 glavnih področjih.
36 Second indent Specific measurable and time-related objectives for the Union as a whole are set in the decisions of the Council and the Parliament, for example in the renewable energy directives and in the Communications of the Commission, for example in the White Paper on Transport and in the Action Plan on energy efficiency. 
36 Druga alinea Specifični, merljivi in časovno določeni cilji za celotno Unijo so opredeljeni v odločitvah Sveta in Parlamenta, na primer v direktivah o obnovljivi energiji, in sporočilih Komisije, na primer v Beli knjigi o prometu in akcijskem načrtu o energetski učinkovitosti.
The objectives of each project must be related to the relevant Community objectives on a case-by-case basis. 
Cilji posameznega projekta morajo biti za vsak primer posebej povezani z ustreznimi cilji Skupnosti.
Third indent For IEE 1, target groups were indicated in a separate document. 
Tretja alinea Ciljne skupine za IEE1 so bile navedene v ločenem dokumentu.
The IEE is a programme for professionals, and they are required to present their own analyses of the market actors that their projects are designed to address. 
IEE je program za strokovnjake, ti pa morajo predložiti svoje analize tržnih akterjev, ki naj bi jih njihovi projekti obravnavali.
Regarding the monitoring and indicators to measure the success of the programme as a whole, IEE1 is a programme with a wide scope for addressing sustainable energy in all sectors of society as defined in the decision of the Parliament and the Council. 
Glede spremljanja in kazalnikov za merjenje uspeha programa kot celote je IEE1 program s širokim obsegom za obravnavo trajnostne energije na vseh družbenih področjih, kot je opredeljeno v odločbi Parlamenta in Sveta.
In this context, the Commission remains of the opinion that the monitoring scheme was appropriate. 
Glede na to Komisija še vedno meni, da je bila shema spremljanja ustrezna.