natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
While it is true that the new, modern equipment itself fulfils EU standards, there was little evidence that, for the 24 Sapard projects for on-farm investments, there was any effect on the quality, health or environmental standards for the farm as a whole. 
Medtem ko nova, moderna oprema sama po sebi dejansko izpolnjuje standarde EU, je obstajalo le malo dokazov, da je to pri 24 projektih programa Sapard za naložbe na kmetijah kakor koli vplivalo na kakovostne, zdravstvene ali okoljske standarde za kmetijo kot celoto.
Similarly for the 20 projects for processing plants reviewed, although there was an effect from the new equipment itself on the plant as a whole, this was not in terms of readiness of the whole establishment to EU standards. 
Podobno se je izkazalo pri 20 preučenih projektih za predelovalne obrate, kjer, četudi je imela nova oprema sama po sebi vpliv na obrat kot celoto, to ni imelo nikakršnega učinka na pripravljenost celotnega obrata za doseganje standardov EU.
The importance of this is underlined in the CommissionŐs recent monitoring reports on the state of preparedness for EU membership (2). 
Pomen tega je poudarjen v zadnjih poročilih Komisije o spremljanju stanja pripravljenosti na članstvo v EU (2).
In these reports, the Commission identified the current pace of upgrading the agri-food establishments in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia as an area of serious concern. 
V teh poročilih je Komisija trenutno hitrost nadgrajevanja agroživilskih obratov na Češkem, na Madžarskem, Poljskem in Slovaškem opredelila kot področje, ki vzbuja resno zaskrbljenost.
For Poland it concluded that urgent progress was needed in public health and that immediate action was needed in order to implement the acquis by the date of accession. 
Za Poljsko je ugotovila, da je nujno potreben napredek na področju javnega zdravja, pa tudi takojšnje ukrepanje za vzpostavitev pravnega reda Evropske skupnosti do datuma pristopa.
The agri-food sector, to which 27 % of Sapard funds are allocated, also receives substantial amounts of foreign direct investments. 
Agroživilski sektor, kateremu je dodeljenih 27 % sredstev iz programa Sapard, prejema tudi precejšnje zneske neposrednih tujih naložb.
In Poland, the sector attracts around 575 million euro of such investment per year, which is 10 times as much as the annual Sapard allocation (3). 
Na Poljskem ta sektor prejme približno 575 milijonov eurov takšnih naložb na leto, kar je desetkrat več, kot znaša letna dodelitev iz programa Sapard (3).
The sector is one of the most dynamic of Polish industry. 
Ta sektor sodi med najbolj dinamične v poljski industriji.
In such an environment, the financing of commercial investments should be left to the private sector. 
V takšnem okolju je treba financiranje komercialnih naložb prepustiti zasebnemu sektorju.
Sapard funding should concentrate on meeting EU standards. 
Financiranje programa Sapard se mora osredotočati na izpolnjevanje standardov EU.
Projects for the measure Ôinvestments in agricultural holdingsŐ typically involved the purchase of bigger, more modern and more powerful farm equipment, which had the effect of increasing production of the beneficiary holding. 
Projekti za ukrep „naložbe v kmetijska gospodarstva“ so običajno vključevali nabavo večje, modernejše in močnejše kmetijske opreme, s čimer je bilo omogočeno povečanje proizvodnje upravičenih kmetijskih gospodarstev.
In some countries there was a strong concentration of these investments in the (1) In total, 48 projects were reviewed for the two measures; however, in two cases the project had not advanced sufficiently to draw a conclusion on the main objective. 
V nekaterih državah je bila koncentracija teh naložb velika v žitnem sektorju. Naložbe (1) Skupaj je bilo v zvezi s tema dvema ukrepoma preučenih 48 projektov, vendar dva projekta nista napredovala dovolj, da bi lahko omogočila izoblikovanje kakršnih koli ugotovitev glede glavnega cilja.
(2) Comprehensive monitoring reports of the European Commission on the state of preparedness for EU membership of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, 5 November 2003. 
(2) Izčrpna poročila Evropske komisije o spremljanju stanja pripravljenosti Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške na članstvo v EU z dne 5. novembra 2003.
(3) The revised EU allocation for 2000-2003 averages 57 million euro per year. (b) (c) if it does not form part of the general taxation system, or if it bears disproportionately on any part of the programme. 
(3) Revidirana dodelitev sredstev EU za obdobje 2000–2003 znaša v povprečju 57 milijonov eurov na leto.
C 295/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.11.2004 cereals sector. Investments in the milk and meat sector, where the need for compliance with EU standards is much higher, were low. 
C 295/10 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 30.11.2004 v mesni in mlečni sektor, kjer je potreba po izpolnjevanju standardov EU veliko večja, so bile majhne.
After analysis of Sapard countriesŐ annual reports submitted in June 2003, the Commission has also identified an imbalance. 
Po opravljeni analizi letnih poročil držav iz programa Sapard, predloženih junija 2003, je Komisija identificirala tudi neravnotežje.
Even if Sapard mainly concerned the purchase of equipment, it could still have contributed to upgrading to EU standards if procedures had been strictly applied. 
Četudi je program Sapard večinoma zadeval nabavo opreme, bi vseeno lahko pripomogel k doseganju standardov EU, če bi bili postopki strogo uporabljeni.
This was not the case: requirements and checks for minimum standards are defined in the national legislation. 
Vendar ni bilo tako: zahteve in preverjanja za minimalne standarde določa nacionalna zakonodaja.
They are the same for all agricultural producers and processing plants, whether they have a Sapard project or not. 
Enaki so za vse kmetijske proizvajalce in predelovalne obrate, najsi ti izvajajo projekt programa Sapard ali ne.
The CourtŐs audit found that hygiene and environmental checks by the national authorities were insufficient. 
Revizija Sodišča je pokazala, da so bila higienska in okoljska preverjanja, izvedena s strani nacionalnih organov, nezadovoljiva.
Further details are provided in paragraphs 70 to 76. 
Nadaljnji podrobni podatki so podani v odstavkih 70–76.
Thus, when looking at the overall Sapard objective of implementation of the acquis concerning the common agricultural policy and related policies, the following can be concluded. 
Zato lahko ob presoji splošnega cilja programa Sapard izvajati pravni red Evropske skupnosti v zvezi s skupno kmetijsko politiko in z njo povezanimi politikami sklenemo naslednje.
Until the end of 2003, the money has generally been spent on projects which increase the quantity of agricultural production, more than on projects which improve the quality of agricultural production (meeting quality and health standards and protection of the environment). 
Do konca leta 2003 se je na splošno več denarja porabilo za projekte, ki povečujejo količino kmetijske proizvodnje, kot pa projekte, ki izboljšujejo kakovost kmetijske proizvodnje (z izpolnjevanjem kakovostnih ter zdravstvenih standardov in varstvom okolja).
Targets were not always clear 48. 
Cilji niso bili vedno jasno opredeljeni 48.
The CourtŐs on-the-spot audits of the priority Ôcreation of employment in rural areasŐ revealed several cases where due to modernisation of equipment using Sapard investments fewer jobs were needed. 
Revizije Sodišča na kraju samem o prednostnem „ustva-rjanju delovnih mest na podeželskih območjih“ so razkrile več primerov, kjer so se zaradi modernizacije opreme z uporabo naložb programa Sapard zmanjšale potrebe po delovnih mestih.
However, the monitoring of Sapard did not take into account any negative effects on rural employment from investments in the agri-food sector. 
Vendar pa spremljanje programa Sapard ni upoštevalo nikakršnega negativnega učinka, ki bi ga na delovna mesta na podeželju imele naložbe v agroživilski sektor.
For the few projects where the number of jobs to be created was quantified, it was found that these were based on general intentions, which depended on the expected market developments rather than on the direct effect of the Sapard project. 
Za le nekaj projektov, kjer je bilo število delovnih mest, ki jih je bilo treba ustvariti, količinsko opredeljeno, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so ta bolj temeljila na uresničevanju splošnih namenov, odvisnih od pričakovanega razvoja na trgu, kot pa bila neposreden rezultat projekta programa Sapard.
Investments in rural development infrastructure have to take place in rural areas in order to be eligible. 
Če hočejo biti naložbe v razvoj podeželske infrastrukture upravičene, jih je treba izvajati na podeželskih območjih.
However, the Commission did not ensure that the projects were actually implemented in rural areas. 
Vendar Komisija pri tem ni zagotovila, da so se projekti dejansko izvajali na podeželskih območjih.
Normally population density is the yardstick for defining rural areas. However, data was not available in certain countries, and the Commission approved the use of other criteria. 
Gostota prebivalstva je običajno merilo za določanje podeželskih območij, vendar v nekaterih državah podatki niso bili na voljo, Komisija pa je odobrila uporabo drugih meril.
Several cases were found where the area served by the project was, in effect, a suburb of a larger town. 
Večkrat je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo območje, ki je bilo zajeto v projektu, dejansko predmestje večjega mesta.
The true rural nature of the municipalities was not established. 
Dejanska podeželska narava skupnosti ni bila potrjena.
This is despite the fact that the gap between infrastructure facilities of urban and rural areas within Sapard countries is generally greater than between urban and rural areas in the present Member States. and reporting on objectives and priorities by the Commission was not as required 50. 
Temu je tako kljub dejstvu, da je razlika med infrastrukturo mestnih in podeželskih območij v državah Saparda na splošno večja, kot je razlika med mestnimi in podeželskimi območji v sedanjih državah članicah. in poročanje Komisije o ciljih ter prednostnih nalogah ni bilo v skladu z zahtevami 50.
Article 13 of the Sapard Regulation stipulates that the Commission shall present an annual report on the Community support granted, in which it shall outline, in particular, the progress made towards achieving the objectives set out. 
Člen 13 Uredbe Sapard določa, da Komisija predstavi letno poročilo o dodeljeni podpori Skupnosti, v katerem opiše predvsem napredek pri doseganju zastavljenih ciljev.
In order to do this, objective criteria for measuring the progress towards achieving objectives or the priorities of the Sapard Regulation, such as a summary of the main indicators set out in the Sapard programmes, should have been set out in the annual reports. 
V ta namen bi bilo treba v letnih poročilih določiti objektivna merila za merjenje napredka pri doseganju ciljev ali izpolnjevanju prednostnih nalog Uredbe Sapard, kot so povzetek glavnih kazalcev, določenih v programih Sapard.
This was not done. 
To ni bilo storjeno.
The 2000, 2001 and 2002 annual reports from the Commission provide detailed and technical descriptions of actions taken by the Commission including progress in terms of setting up the systems and payments (1). 
Letna poročila Komisije za leto 2000, 2001 in 2002 zagotavljajo podrobne in tehnične opise ukrepov, ki jih je Komisija izvajala, vključno z napredkom v smislu vzpostavljanja sistemov in plačil (1).
However, these are only the means needed to achieve the objectives. 
Vendar so to le sredstva, ki so potrebna za doseganje ciljev.
Four years after the start of the programme, the Commission has not established or communicated the extent to which the objectives set out for the programme have been achieved. 
Štiri leta po uvedbi programa Komisija še ni določila ali sporočila obsega, v katerem so bili zastavljeni cilji programa doseženi.
Institution building has been positive except for agri-environment 52. 
Institucionalna krepitev je bila uspešna, razen pri kmetijskem okolju 52.
Despite the objectives and priority areas defined in the Council Regulation, the Commission views Sapard mainly as an institutional-building device to ensure the easy take-up of Community practices after accession. 
Kljub ciljem in prednostnim področjem, določenim v uredbi Sveta, je program Sapard s stališča Komisije predvsem mehanizem institucionalne krepitve, ki zagotavlja lahek prevzem praks Komisije po pristopu.
Thus, the Commission has stressed on various occasions, including in its annual reports, that the real contribution of Sapard is to facilitate implementation of necessary arrangements after accession. 
Zato je Komisija ob več priložnostih, vključno v svojih letnih poročilih, poudarila, da je resnični prispevek programa Sapard pospeševanje izvajanja ureditev, ki so potrebne po pristopu.
However, Sapard should primarily be judged as to how well it has contributed to the objectives set when it was created. 
Vendar pa je treba program Sapard prvotno presojati glede na to, kako uspešno je prispeval k ciljem, ki so bili zastavljeni ob njegovem nastanku.
It must also be borne in mind that institution building is one of the objectives of the Phare programme and programmes for easy take-up of Community practices have been implemented through Phare management procedures and paid for by the Phare budget (2). 
Prav tako ne smemo pozabiti, da je institucionalna krepitev eden od ciljev programa PHARE ter da se programi za lahek prevzem praks Komisije izvajajo v okviru postopkov za upravljanje programa PHARE in plačujejo iz proračuna programa PHARE (2).
In each of the countries visited around 6 million euro from Phare was used for pre-accession advisers, experts for programming and setting up and auditing the systems, pilot projects and computer equipment for and training of staff in the bodies which were implementing Sapard. 
V vsaki obiskani državi je bilo približno 6 milijonov eurov iz programa PHARE porabljenih za predpristopne svetovalce, strokovnjake za programiranje in vzpostavljanje in revidiranje sistemov, pilotne projekte in programsko opremo in usposabljanje za osebje organov, ki so izvajali program Sapard.
(1) Sapardannualreports(ReportsfromtheCommissiontotheEuropean Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions) COM(2001) 241 final 3 July 2001, COM(2002) 434 final 30 July 2002, COM(2003) 582 final 7 October 2003. 
(1) Letna poročila programa Sapard (Poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru ter Odboru regij) COM(2001) 241 konč. z dne 3. julija 2001, COM(2002) 434 konč. z dne 30. julija 2002, COM(2003) 582 konč. z dne 7. oktobra 2003.
(2) In March 1997, the Commission decided to fully focus the Phare pre-accession instrument on preparing candidate countries for joining the EU. 
(2) Marca 1997 je Komisija sklenila, da bo predpristopni instrument programa PHARE popolnoma usmerila v pripravo držav kandidatk na pridružitev EU.
About 30 % of the annual Phare budget of around 1 500 million euro per year was allocated to institution building, in particular to introducing the objectives and procedures of the Structural Funds. 
Letni proračun programa PHARE, ki znaša približno 1 500 milijonov eurov, je bil dodeljen za približno 30 % institucionalne krepitve, zlasti za uvedbo ciljev in postopkov strukturnih skladov.
30.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 295/11 54. 
30.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 295/11 54.
The institution-building effect of Sapard has been positive. 
Učinek institucionalne krepitve programa Sapard je pozitiven.
Phare paid for and managed the institution building, while Sapard provided the opportunity of Ôlearning-by-doingŐ. 
Program PHARE je plačeval in upravljal institucionalno krepitev, medtem ko je program SAPARD zagotavljal priložnost „učenja ob delu“.
Sapard could provide national administrations with hands-on experience for the management of EU funds because many procedures are the same (programming, implementation procedures, monitoring). 
Program Sapard je lahko nacionalnim upravam omogočil praktične izkušnje za upravljanje sredstev EU, saj so mnogi postopki enaki (programiranje, izvedbeni postopki, spremljanje).
The combined results of Phare and Sapard have been an achievement, because structures and systems which were virtually non-existent only a few years ago have been set up and were found to be both operational and generally effective. 
Skupni rezultati programov PHARE in Sapard so pomemben dosežek, saj so bili strukture in sistemi, ki jih še pred nekaj leti praktično ni bilo, vzpostavljeni ter operativni in na splošno učinkoviti.
Paragraphs 61 to 65 provide further details on these systems. 
Nadaljnji podrobni podatki o teh sistemih so podani v odstavkih 61–65.
However, institution building and learning-by-doing were not successful for the agri-environmental measure. 
Vendar institucionalna krepitev in učenje ob delu nista bila uspešna za kmetijskookoljski ukrep.
This important rural development measure is the only one which is compulsory for Member States, and it is also the largest, representing 41 % of funds available for rural development under EAGGF Guarantee. 
Ta pomembni ukrep za razvoj podeželja je edini obvezni ukrep za države članice pa tudi največji, saj predstavlja 41 % razpoložljivih sredstev za razvoj podeželja v okviru Jamstvenega sklada EKUJS.
The reform of the CAP also places increased importance on agricultural environment. 
Tudi reforma skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) pripisuje vse večji pomen kmetijskemu okolju.
Due to the complexity of the agri-environment measure in general, and the fact that it was conceived as a pilot under Sapard, details were issued by the Commission to the Sapard countries only on 21 December 2001. 
Zaradi splošne zapletenosti kmetijskookoljskega ukrepa in dejstva, da je bil izoblikovan kot pilotni ukrep v okviru programa Sapard, je Komisija državam Saparda predložila podrobne podatke šele 21. decembra 2001.
These details required modifications to the Sapard Programmes which have been approved for each country and the setting up and approval of the relevant systems. 
Ti podrobni podatki so zahtevali spremembe programov Sapard, ki so bile odobrene za vse države, ter vzpostavitev in odobritev ustreznih sistemov.
This meant that the measure could not be implemented before the end of 2002. 
To je pomenilo, da se ukrep ni mogel izvajati do konca leta 2002.
By December 2003, only the Czech Republic and Slovakia managed to do this. 
Do decembra 2003 je to uspelo le Češki in Slovaški.
Poland suggested doing the same, but was convinced by the Commission of the relevance of keeping it. 
Poljska je imela enak predlog, vendar jo je Komisija prepričala, da je ukrep primerneje ohraniti.
However, delays in working out the detailed implementation rules continued, and the measure was not implemented in Poland before it joined the EU. 
Vendar pa so se zamude pri oblikovanju podrobnih izvedbenih pravil nadaljevale, ukrep pa se na Poljskem ni izvajal vse do njenega vstopa v EU.
The Commission defined for the agri-environment measure that the actions should have the objective of developing practical experience of agri-environment implementation at both the administrative and farm levels. 
Komisija je za kmetijskookoljski ukrep določila, da mora biti cilj ukrepov razvijati praktične izkušnje na področju izvajanja programa v kmetijskem okolju na upravni ravni in na ravni kmetij.
This objective has not been met, because by December 2003, six out of eight beneficiary countries acceding in May 2004 had gained only limited experience of implementing this measure under Sapard. 
Ta cilj ni izpolnjen, saj je decembra 2003 šest od osmih držav upravičenk, ki so pristopile maja 2004, pridobilo le omejene izkušnje z izvajanjem tega ukrepa v okviru programa Sapard.
ASSESSMENT OF SYSTEMS SET UP IN SAPARD COUNTRIES Prior approval of the systems has ensured tight financial control systems 58. 
OCENA SISTEMOV, VZPOSTAVLJENIH V DRŽAVAH SAPARDA Predhodna odobritev sistemov je zagotovila sisteme tesne finančne kontrole 58.
The Sapard legal basis required a decision from the Commission on decentralised management, based on an analysis of the management and control systems of the country concerned (known as conferral of management). 
Pravna podlaga programa Sapard je zahtevala sklep Komisije o decentraliziranem upravljanju, ki temelji na analizi sistemov upravljanja in kontrole zadevne države (znano kot prenos upravljanja).
As at December 2003, 17 Commission decisions were made for parts of the system approved in a country, each of which conferred management of aid on a provisional basis. 
Decembra 2003 je Komisija sprejela 17 sklepov za dele odobrenega sistema v določeni državi in z vsemi je bilo upravljanje pomoči začasno preneseno.
Full conferral, which was envisaged after further verifications by the Commission and implementation of Commission recommendations, was not given. 
Popolnega prenosa, ki je bil predviden, potem ko so izvedena nadaljnja preverjanja s strani Komisije in potem ko so izpolnjena priporočila Komisije, ni bilo.
The Commission did not assume its responsibility to fully decentralise management. 
Komisija ni izpolnila svoje odgovornosti, da popolnoma decentralizira upravljanje.
Indeed, the Commission did not define the criteria to be met to receive full conferral of management. 
Komisija dejansko ni določila meril, ki jih je treba izpolniti za odobritev popolnega prenosa upravljanja.
The legal basis also defined the minimum criteria and conditions for decentralised management, such as a well-defined system for managing the funds including effective internal control and the presence of adequate personnel. 
Pravna podlaga je določila tudi minimalna merila in pogoje za decentralizirano upravljanje, kot so na primer jasno določeni sistem za upravljanje s sredstvi, vključno z učinkovito notranjo kontrolo in prisotnostjo ustreznega osebja.
The CommissionŐs analyses, in the form of system audits, have ensured that a well-defined system with key controls was in place before any funds could be spent (1). 
Analize, ki jih je Komisija opravila v obliki sistemskih revizij, so omogočile, da je jasno določeni sistem s ključnimi kontrolami ustrezno deloval, še preden so bila lahko porabljena kakršna koli sredstva (1).
Consequently, Sapard countries started project implementation (concluding contracts) after the Commission decision approving the systems, when all procedures, check lists and forms were approved. 
Zato so države Saparda začele izvajati projekte (sklepati pogodbe), potem ko je Komisija izdala odločbo o odobritvi sistemov in ko so bili odobreni vsi postopki, seznami za preverjanje pravilnosti ter obrazci.
This situation is different in Member States, where Structural Funds expenditure for the period 2000-2006 was eligible from 1 January 2000 or, in certain circumstances, as soon as the first draft of the programming document was submitted to the Commission, without prior approval of the systems. 
Drugače je v državah članicah, kjer so bili izdatki strukturnih skladov za obdobje 2000–2006 upravičeni od 1. januarja 2000 ali v nekaterih okoliščinah, takoj ko je bil Komisiji predložen prvi osnutek programskega dokumenta, brez predhodne odobritve sistemov.
Systems were generally working in practice 61. 
Sistemi so v praksi v glavnem delovali 61.
The Sapard management and control systems have key elements in common with EU programmes. 
Ključni elementi sistemov upravljanja in kontrole programa Sapard so enaki tistim v programih EU.
Structural Fund procedures are applied for programming, monitoring and evaluation. 
Postopki strukturnih skladov se uporabljajo za načrtovanje programov, spremljanje in ocenjevanje.
EAGGF Guarantee Fund procedures are used for the financial management, including the clearance of accounts procedure (2) and use of paying agencies. 
Postopki Jamstvenega sklada EKUJS se uporabljajo za finančno poslovodenje, vključno s postopkom potrditve obračunov (2) in uporabo plačilnih agencij.