natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nevertheless, the Commission considers it appropriate to define certain general rules for inspection procedures (format for inspection reports, inspection procedure, vademecum for follow up of infringe-ments), which will effectively contribute to a level playing field. 
Vendar pa Komisija meni, da je primerno določiti nekatera splošna pravila za inšpekcijske postopke (oblika inšpekcijskih poročil, inšpekcijski postopek, priročnik za spremljanje kršitev), ki bodo učinkovito prispevala k doseganju enakih pogojev delovanja.
The Community Fisheries Control Agency could contribute to this task in line with its mandate. 
Agencija Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva bi lahko prispevala k temu cilju v skladu s svojimi pooblastili.
At the initiative of the Commission, similar provision have already been put in place at the level of certain Regional Fisheries Management Organisations. 
Na pobudo Komisije so podobne določbe že uvedene na ravni nekaterih regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva.
The current system has been established on the basis of an obligation for Member States to achieve an effective control system. 
Trenutni sistem je bil vzpostavljen na podlagi obveznosti držav članic, da morajo vzpostaviti učinkovit sistem nadzora.
The Commission considers that the scope for developing common rules is limited given the absence of common factors. 
Komisija meni, da je področje razvijanja skupnih pravil omejeno zaradi odsotnosti skupnih dejavnikov.
Moreover, as pointed out in reply to point 53, the absence of detailed rules does not diminish Member StatesŐ obligation to achieve an effective control system. 
Poleg tega, kot je poudarjeno v odgovoru na točko 53, odsotnost podrobnih pravil ne zmanjšuje obveznosti držav članic, da vzpostavijo učinkovit sistem nadzora.
The inspections undertaken have provided the Commission with a good knowledge on the application of specific provisions and the functioning of the inspection and monitoring systems of Member States and have, in fact, allowed the Commission to detect key weaknesses in Member States. 
Komisija se je na podlagi opravljenih inšpekcijskih pregledov dobro seznanila z izvajanjem nekaterih določb in delovanjem sistemov držav članic za inšpekcijske preglede in spremljanje ter pri tem dejansko odkrila pomanjkljivosti v državah članicah.
28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 317/29 While the Commission has focussed its resources on high risk cases, general evaluations have also been undertaken through horizontal inspection programmes on catch reporting systems (2005-2006), market regulations (2004), third country vessels landings (2005), VMS implementation (2004-2006) and deep-sea fisheries in European waters (2005-2006). 
28.12.2007 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 317/29 Čeprav je Komisija svoja sredstva osredotočila na primere, ki so vključevali velika tveganja, so bile opravljene tudi splošne ocene v okviru horizontalnih programov inšpekcijskih pregledov za sisteme poročanja o ulovu (2005–2006), tržne predpise (2004), iztovore plovil iz tretjih držav (2005), izvajanje sistema spremljanja plovil (VMS) (2004–2006) ter globokomorski ribolov v evropskih vodah (2005–2006).
Moreover, since 2004, the Commission has regularly used a series of questionnaires and evaluation sheets to evaluate the systems of control in Member States, notably in terms of compliance with recently adopted rules and with the quality of individual inspections. 
Poleg tega Komisija od leta 2004 redno uporablja vrsto vprašalnikov in ocenjevalnih obrazcev za vrednotenje sistemov nadzora v državah članicah, zlasti kar zadeva izpolnjevanje nedavno sprejetih pravil in upoštevanje kakovosti posameznih inšpekcijskih pregledov.
Furthermore, indicators of compliance (intensity and quality of inspections) have been defined and used to evaluate Member States compliance with the CFP in the context of infringement proceedings. 
Določeni so bili kazalci skladnosti (intenzivnost in kakovost inšpekcijskih pregledov), ki so se uporabljali za ocenjevanje skladnosti držav članic s SRP v okviru postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev.
The Commission has worked on establishing benchmarks and priorities in certain fisheries, which have proved effective. 
Komisija si je prizadevala, da bi določila merila uspešnosti in prednostne naloge v nekaterih vrstah ribištva, kar se je izkazalo za učinkovito.
Further steps in this direction are foreseen in the review and revision of the Control Regulation. 
Predvideni so nadaljnji ukrepi v tej smeri v okviru pregleda in revizije uredbe o nadzoru.
It is against this background that the Commission has recently (1) made efforts to establish benchmarks as pointed out in the reply to point 59. 
V zvezi s tem vprašanjem si je Komisija pred kratkim (1) prizadevala, da bi določila merila uspešnosti, kot je poudarjeno v odgovoru na točko 59.
Moreover, it has established guidelines for the Member States for defining, per type of inspection, the minimum standards to be ensured. 
Poleg tega je državam članicam zagotovila smernice za določitev minimalnih standardov glede na vrsto inšpekcijskega pregleda, ki jih je treba zagotoviti.
These efforts have been welcomed by the Member States. 
Države članice so pozdravile ta prizadevanja.
The review and revision of the Control Regulation will be an opportunity to incorporate these standards into the CFP legislation. 
Pregled in revizija uredbe o nadzoru bo priložnost, da se ti standardi vključijo v zakonodajo na področju SRP.
In addition, it will remain necessary to continue the cooperation between Member States. 
Poleg tega bo še naprej treba ohranjati sodelovanje med državami članicami.
In particular, the Community Fisheries Control Agency is expected play an important roles in this regard. 
Pri tem se zlasti od Agencije Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva pričakuje, da bo imela pomembno vlogo na tem področju.
As regards the desirability of checking fish holds at the end of a landing, the Commission believes that this should be part of a full inspection. 
Komisija meni, da bi moralo preverjanje skladišč ob koncu iztovarjanja soditi v okvir celotnega inšpekcijskega pregleda.
This approach is also reflected in legislation covering the pelagic fisheries from 2005 and the Baltic fisheries from 2008. 
Ta pristop je razviden tudi iz zakonodaje, ki zajema pelagično ribištvo od leta 2005 in baltsko ribištvo od leta 2008.
See also the replies to point 60 and 62. 
Glej tudi odgovore na točki 60 in 62.
The Commission has been systematically attentive to this issue for many years, finally allowing it in 2007 to establish general criteria for effective inspections. 
Komisija že vrsto let sistematično posveča pozornost temu vprašanju, kar ji je v letu 2007 omogočilo, da določi splošna merila za učinkovite inšpekcijske preglede.
The Commission notes that there are differences between Member States and that some of them have in fact established procedural guides for their inspectors. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da obstajajo razlike med državami članicami in da so nekatere med njimi dejansko določile postopkovne smernice za svoje inšpektorje.
In the framework of recovery and multiannual management plans, benchmarks of inspection have been established, inter alia cod recovery programme North Sea, Baltic, Bluefin Tuna and Greenland Halibut. 
V okviru načrtov za obnovitev in večletno upravljanje so bila določena merila uspešnosti za inšpekcijske preglede, med drugim program za obnovitev trske v Severnem morju in Baltskem morju, ter modroplavutega tuna in grenlandske morske plošče.
(1) Meeting with Member States on 7 March 2007. 
(1) Sestanek z državami članicami dne 7. marca 2007.
The Commission began discusions on the documentation of individual inspections already in 2005 and continued them in 2006 in the context of case C-304/02 against France. 
Komisija je začela z razpravami o dokumentiranju posameznih inšpekcijskih pregledov že v letu 2005 in z njimi nadaljevala v letu 2006 v okviru zadeve C-304/02 proti Franciji.
In view of the establishment of a database integrating all inspection reports, in line with the opinions expressed by the Commission in some of its communications (e.g. the communication on serious infringements (2)), the Commission launched, in spring 2007, a debate with Member States. 
Komisija je spomladi 2007 začela razpravo z državami članicami za ustanovitev baze podatkov, ki bi združila vsa poročila o inšpekcijskih pregledih v skladu z mnenji, ki jih je Komisija izrazila v nekaterih svojih sporočilih (na primer Sporočilo o resnih kršitvah (2)).
The Commission expects the Community Fisheries Control Agency to play an important role in improving transparency and harmonisation and to coordinate the establishment of comment practices under the scope of the joint deployment plans. 
Komisija pričakuje, da bo imela Agencija Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva pomembno vlogo pri izboljšanju preglednosti in usklajenosti in da bo v okviru načrtov skupne uporabe koordinirala uvedbo skupnih postopkov.
The Commission considers that standardized inspection skills and reports would enhance the quality control of the fisheries inspection and intends to address this issue with priority in the review and revision of the Control Regulation. 
Komisija meni, da bi standardizirane inšpekcijske veščine in poročanje povečali kontrolo kakovosti inšpekcijskih pregledov in namerava to vprašaje prednostno obravnavati v okviru pregleda in revizije uredbe o nadzoru.
66. and 67. 
66. in 67.
The Commission considers this to be a good example of best practice and intends to address the issue in the review and revision of the Control Regulation. 
Komisija meni, da je to dober primer najboljše prakse, in namerava to vprašaje obravnavati v okviru pregleda in revizije uredbe o nadzoru.
Progress has been made since the CourtŐs visit to the Member States concerned. two of the four Member States mentioned (United Kingdom and France) have already implemented such a system. 
Od obiska Računskega sodišča v zadevnih državah članicah je bil dosežen napredek. Dve izmed štirih omenjenih držav članic (Združeno kraljestvo in Francija) sta že uvedli tak sistem.
Only inspections fulfilling the minimum quality standards should be taken into account when assessing the volume and scope of inspection activities. 
Pri ocenjevanju obsega in področja inšpekcijskih dejavnosti bi se morali upoštevati le inšpekcijski pregledi, ki izpolnjujejo minimalne standarde kakovosti.
See the reply to point 63. 
Glej odgovor na točko 63.
An increasing number of Member States now provide for their inspectors to have real-time access to such data at their work place. 
Vse več držav članic sedaj svojim inšpektorjem zagotavlja dostop do takih podatkov v realnem času na delovnem mestu.
However, the current situation still remains unsatisfactory and the issue of access to VMS data therefore remains a priority for the Commission. 
Vendar pa so trenutne razmere še vedno nezadovoljive in dostop do podatkov VMS zato ostaja prednostno vprašanje za Komisijo.
79-81. 
79. in 81.
An increasing number of Member States have started using risk analysis techniques in order to deploy limited resources in the most effective manner. 
Vse več držav članic je začelo uporabljati tehnike za analizo tveganja, da bi kar najučinkoviteje izkoristile omejena sredstva.
Cross-checking by Member States of catch data with data collected for other purposes (fiscal, customs and/or other) is indeed important and the Commission is certainly favourable to steps in that direction. 
Navzkrižno preverjanje podatkov o ulovu s podatki, zbranimi v druge namene (davčne, carinske in/ali druge), ki ga izvajajo države članice, je resnično pomembno in Komisija vsekakor podpira ukrepe v tej smeri.
Yet, this will have to be done carefully with due regard to the fact that the data in question have been collected for completely different purposes (problem of the comparability of data and data protection requirements). 
Vendar pa bo to treba izvajati previdno, ob ustreznem upoštevanju dejstva, da so bili ti podatki zbrani za popolnoma drugačne namene (problem primerljivosti podatkov in zahteve po varstvu podatkov).
The variety of inspection services can indeed create risks and the Commission has already underlined this problem on several occasions (3). 
Številnost inšpekcijskih služb lahko resnično povzroči tveganja in Komisija je to težavo že večkrat poudarila (3).
However, under the EC Treaty, Member States remain free to define the structure of their administration. 
Vendar lahko v skladu s Pogodbo ES države članice same opredelijo strukturo svoje uprave.
(2) COM(2007) 448 final. 
(2) COM(2007) 448 konč.
C 317/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 28.12.2007 84. and 85. 
C 317/30 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 28.12.2007 84. in 85.
Early in 2007, the Commission introduced a standard template to be used in reporting statistics of inspection activity. 
Na začetku leta 2007 je Komisija uvedla standardni vzorec za uporabo v statistiki poročanja o inšpekcijskih dejavnostih.
Moreover, indicators could be applied: for assessing the activity, the number of inspectors could be used; the assessment of results could for example be based on the number of gaps in VMS transmissions, the number of reported delays in the data collection system, the coherence between the logbooks, landing declarations and VMS, etc. 86. and 87. 
Poleg tega se lahko uporabijo kazalniki: za ocenjevanje dejavnosti se lahko uporabi število inšpektorjev; vrednotenje rezultatov bi lahko na primer temeljilo na številu presledkov v prenosih podatkov VMS, številu prijavljenih zamud v sistemu zbiranja podatkov, skladnosti med ladijskimi dnevniki, deklaracijami o iztovarjanju in podatki VMS itd. 86. in 87.
The Commission considers the establishment of the Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA) will improve the situation. 
Komisija meni, da se bodo razmere izboljšale z ustanovitvijo Agencije Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva (CFCA).
The CFCA is mandated to organise operational cooperation between Member States by the adoption of Joint Deployment Plans giving effect to specific control and inspection plans. 
Naloga Agencije Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva je, da organizira operativno sodelovanje med državami članicami s sprejetjem načrtov skupne uporabe, kar omogoča izvajanje posebnih načrtov za nadzor in inšpekcijske preglede.
It has to assess amongst other things whether sufficient national means of inspection and surveillance are available. 
Med drugim mora oceniti, ali so na voljo zadostna nacionalna sredstva za inšpekcijske preglede in nadzor.
Finally, it will assist Member States in order to harmonise inspection methodologies and procedures. 
In končno, državam članicam bo pomagala uskladiti inšpekcijske metodologije in postopke.
In this way control and inspection activities should be improved both quantitatively and qualitatively. 
Tako bi se morale dejavnosti nadzora in inšpekcijskih pregledov izboljšati v kvantitativno in kakovostno.
An enhanced mandate could further improve the situation. 
Okrepljena pooblastila bi lahko še dodatno izboljšala razmere.
In the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on reports from Member States on behaviour which seriously infringed the rules of the CFP (1) the Commission called on Member States to ensure a system of sanctions that has a deterrent effect and to amend as appropriate their legislation so that sanctions have a dissuasive effect. 
V Sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu Parlamentu o poročilih iz držav članic glede načinov ravnanja, ki so resno kršila pravila Skupne ribiške politike (1), je Komisija pozvala države članice, da zagotovijo sistem kazni, ki ima svarilen učinek, in da ustrezno spremenijo svojo zakonodajo, da bi imele kazni odvračalen učinek.
Further integration and harmonisation could be of added value for improving the implementation by Member States of an effective sanction system. 
Nadaljnje združevanje in usklajevanje bi lahko prispevalo k izboljšanju izvajanja učinkovitega sistema kazni v državah članicah.
In that regard, the Commission is currently exploring the possibility to include in the foreseen new initiatives regarding illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing harmonised sanctions to be applied for certain specific ÔIUU-offencesŐ In addition, the forthcoming review and revision of the Control Regulation will be an opportunity to address this issue. 
V zvezi s tem Komisija trenutno proučuje možnost, da v predvidene nove pobude v zvezi z nezakonitim, nereguliranim in neprijavljenim ribolovom (IUU) vključi usklajene kazni, ki bi se izvajale za določene „kršitve IUU“. Poleg tega se bo to vprašanje lahko obravnavalo v okviru prihodnjega pregleda in revizije uredbe o nadzoru.
Further improvement of the homogeneity of information provided by Members States in their reports on serious infringements pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1447/1999 as well further study of the relevant serious infringements is needed in order to prepare a proposal concerning the catalogue of sanctions. 
Za pripravo predloga v zvezi s seznamom kazni so potrebne nadaljnje izboljšave homogenosti informacij, ki jih posredujejo države članice v svojih poročilih o resnih kršitvah v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1447/1999, ter tudi nadaljnja proučitev pomembnih resnih kršitev.
As pointed out in reply to point 92, the Commission intends to address this issue in the near future. 
Kot je poudarjeno v odgovoru na točko 92, Komisija namerava to vprašanje obravnavati v bližnji prihodnosti.
The infringement proceedings have not been without effect. 
Postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev niso bili neučinkoviti.
The Commission has opened infringement proceedings against several Member States. 
Komisija je sprožila postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev proti več državam članicam.
After the judgement of the ECJ in case C-304/02, Member States subject to such proceedings have been induced to make serious efforts to improve the compliance with the respective obligations. 
Po sprejetju sodbe Evropskega sodišča v zadevi C-304/02 so se države članice, ki so predmet takih postopkov, prepričale, da si morajo resno prizadevati, da bi izboljšale izpolnjevanje ustreznih obveznosti.
Apart from infringement proceedings, Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 empowers the Commission to take preventive measures, to close the fishery when it deems a Member State has exhausted its quota and to suspend Community financial assistance. 
Poleg postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev Uredba (ES) št. 2371/2002 daje Komisiji pooblastila, da sprejme preventivne ukrepe, prekine ribolov, kadar meni, da je država članica porabila svojo kvoto, in ukine finančno pomoč Skupnosti.
96. and 97. 
96. in 97.
Infringement proceedings against Member States are circumscribed by the provisions of Article 226 of the EC Treaty. 
Postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državam članicam so določeni v določbah člena 226 Pogodbe ES.
The handling by the Commission of infringement proceedings is shaped by the case law of the ECJ. 
Vodenje postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev s strani Komisije določa sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča.
The Commission has the burden of proof in infringement proceedings, which becomes particularly relevant in cases where the alleged non-compliance by a Member State consists in a particular administrative practice. 
Dokazno breme v postopkih za ugotavljanje kršitev nosi Komisija, kar je zlasti pomembno v primerih, kadar domnevno neizpolnjevanje obveznosti s strani države članice vključuje določen upravni postopek.
In such a case, it is actually decisive to demonstrate that the shortcomings are both general and ongoing. 
V takem primeru je dejansko odločilnega pomena, da se dokaže, da so pomanjkljivosti splošne in stalne.
The case C-304/02 underscored the difficulties of assembling proper means of proof in a situation where an administrative practice of a Member State was at issue and the efforts made have in fact contributed to the imposition of a significantly higher fine than those imposed for any of the other five cases ever decided upon by the ECJ on the basis of Article 228 of the EC Treaty. 
V zadevi C-304/02 so poudarjene težave pri zbiranju ustreznih dokaznih sredstev v razmerah, ko je bila sporna upravna praksa države članice, in prizadevanja so dejansko prispevala k naložitvi znatno višje kazi, kot je bila naložena v kateri koli od ostalih petih zadev, o katerih je odločalo Evropsko sodišče na podlagi člena 228 Pogodbe ES.
Preventive measures pursuant to the Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 can only be provisional in nature and limited in time (up to a maximum of six months, as indicated). 
Preventivni ukrepi v skladu s členom 26 Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002 so lahko le začasne narave in časovno omejeni (do največ 6 mesecev, kot je navedeno).
Consequently, such preventive measures can only come into play in exceptional circumstances. 
Zato se lahko taki preventivni ukrepi izvajajo le v izrednih okoliščinah.
Since 1996, the obligation to deduct amounts from future fishing opportunities, has been implemented yearly by way of applying Regulation (EC) No 847/96, which establishes the conditions for the year-to-year management of total allowable catches (TACs) and quotas. 
Od leta 1996 se obveznost odštevanja zneskov od prihodnjih ribolovnih možnosti izvaja vsako leto z uporabo Uredbe (ES) št. 847/96, ki določa pogoje za upravljanje celotnih dovoljenih ulovov (TAC) in kvot iz leta v leto.
In normal circumstances over-fishing will have been detected in the year of or the one following the over fishing and thus there was never a need for additional action. 
V običajnih okoliščinah se prekomeren ribolov odkrije v letu prekoračitve ali v letu, ki sledi letu prekoračitve, zato ni bilo nikoli potrebe po dodatnih ukrepih.
In 2007 however, for the first time, following a national investigation, two Member States reported to the Commission significant amounts of catches which had been landed in the period from 2001 to 2004 without having been recorded. 
V letu 2007 pa sta 2 državi članici Komisiji po nacionalnih preiskavah prvič prijavili znatne zneske ulovov, ki so bili iztovorjeni v obdobju od leta 2001 do leta 2004, ne da bi bili evidentirani.
Given that Regulation (EC) No 847/96 does not envisage deductions for such Ôhistoric overfishingŐ, the Commission had to adopt an ad hoc Regulation. 
Ker Uredba (ES) št. 847/96 ne predvideva zmanjševanj za take „zgodovinske prekoračitve“, je morala Komisija sprejeti priložnostno uredbo.
This ad hoc Regulation (2) provided a solution based on an analysis of the biological and socio-economic consequences of this Regulation. 
Ta priložnostna uredba (2) je zagotovila rešitev, ki temelji na analizi bioloških in socialno-ekonomskih posledic te uredbe.
Finally, in response to this situation, the Council, during its meeting on 11 and 12 June 2007, has invited the Commission to develop principles in the forthcoming review of the EU control regulations to be applied in respect of any such over-fishing which comes to light in any EU fishery. 
Kot odziv na te razmere je Svet med svojim zasedanjem 11. in 12. junija 2007 pozval Komisijo, da oblikuje načela v okviru prihodnjega pregleda uredb EU o nadzoru, ki naj bi se uporabljala v zvezi s kakršnim koli prekomernim ribolovom, ki se ugotovi v katerem koli ribištvu Evropske unije.
(1) COM(2007) 448 final. 
(1) COM(2007) 448 konč.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 147/2007 (OJ L 46, 16.2.2007, p. 
(2) Uredba (ES) št. 147/2007 (UL L 46, 16.2.2007, str.
28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 317/31 103. 
28.12.2007 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 317/31 103.
The current CFP legislation only allows the Commission to suspend Community funding in case of non-compliance with the rules concerning fishing capacity. 
Trenutna zakonodaja na področju SRP omogoča Komisiji le, da ukine financiranje s strani Skupnosti v primeru neizpolnjevanja pravil v zvezi z ribolovno zmogljivostjo.
The Commission believes that further extension of such measures would be useful and will explore the possibilities for proposals in that direction in the review and revision of the Control Regulation. 
Komisija meni, da bi bila dodatna razširitev takih ukrepov koristna, in bo proučila možnosti za predloge v tej smeri v okviru pregleda in revizije uredbe o nadzoru.