natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court found that Member States provide information about irregularities as required but do so with varying delays. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da države članice sporočajo nepravilnosti v skladu z zahtevami, vendar z različno velikimi zamudami.
There are also inconsistencies in the data. There are discrepancies between the data supplied by Member States and the figures in the database drawn from them. 
Prihaja tudi do nedoslednosti podatkov – podatki, ki jih posredujejo države članice, in zneski v podatkovni bazi, pridobljeni na podlagi teh podatkov, se razlikujejo.
The CommissionŐs database on reported irregularities is not complete and accurate. 
Podatkovna baza Komisije v zvezi s prijavljenimi nepravilnostmi je nepopolna in netočna.
The low rate of recovery of irregular payments (a cumulative recovery rate of only 17 % since 1971) is in part due to national administrative delays and practices (suspension of action to recover until related legal action concerning fraud has been completed, absence of preferred creditor status for CAP debts, no disincentive to frivolous appeals) and to the CommissionŐs reluctance to accept offers of partial settlement. 
Nizka stopnja izterjave nepravilnih plačil (le 17-odstotna stopnja skupne izterjave od leta 1971) je deloma posledica zamud in praks državnih uprav (preložitev izterjave na čas, ko je zaključen zadevni pravni postopek v zvezi z goljufijo, odsotnost statusa prednostnega upnika za dolgove SKP, odsotnost zaviralnih dejavnikov za neutemeljene pritožbe), deloma pa nepripravljenost Komisije, da sprejme ponudbe delne poravnave.
V. Only 10 % of reported irregular payments have been written off, partly because Member States have put forward few cases as irrecoverable, partly because the Commission has been slow to take action on long-standing irregular payments. 
V. Samo 10 % prijavljenih nepravilnih plačil je bilo odpisanih, deloma zato, ker so države članice le malo primerov prikazale kot neizterljive, in deloma zato, ker je bila Komisija počasna pri ukrepanju v zvezi z dolgo-letnimi nepravilnimi plačili.
The Commission had no adequate criteria for deciding whether sums written off should be charged to the Member States or borne by the Community and has inadequate information on whether decisions written off are carried out correctly. 
Komisija ni imela primernih meril pri odločanju, ali bi morali odpisani zneski bremeniti države članice ali Skupnost, prav tako nima zadostnih podatkov o tem, ali se odločitve o odpisu izvajajo pravilno.
Responsibilities for irregular CAP payments are shared between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture: formal and effective responsibilities differ; misunderstandings occur. 
Odgovornost za nepravilna plačila SKP si delita OLAF in Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo: formalne in dejanske odgovornosti se razlikujejo; prihaja do nesporazumov.
The Commission does not make systematic use of the information it obtains about irregularities when managing and proposing changes in the CAP. 
Komisija ne uporablja sistematično podatkov, ki jih dobi o nepravilnostih, ko upravlja in predlaga spremembe v SKP.
VII. The ÔblacklistŐ does not work. 
VII. „Črna lista“ ne deluje.
The separate arrangements by which Member States report all debts due to the Community in respect of the CAP have been improved in recent years but still have a number of weaknesses. 
Izvajanje posameznih dogovorov o tem, da morajo države članice prijaviti vse dolgove do Skupnosti v okviru SKP, se je v zadnjih letih sicer izboljšalo, vendar še vedno obstajajo številne pomanjkljivosti.
It is not possible to reconcile the data produced with those for irregular payments. 
Pridob-ljenih podatkov ni mogoče uskladiti s tistimi o nepravilnih plačilih.
The Court recommends the Commission to consider changes in the arrangements for the reporting, recovery and writing off of irregular CAP payments to remedy the weaknesses set out above, and in the division of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture; and to consult with Member States on the future of the ÔblacklistŐ. 4.11.2004 
Sodišče Komisiji priporoča, naj ugotovi, ali so potrebne spremembe tako pri dogovorih o sporočanju, izterjavi in odpisu nepravilnih plačil SKP, da bi s tem odpravila zgoraj navedene pomanjkljivosti, kot tudi pri porazdelitvi odgovornosti med OLAF in Generalnim direktoratom za kmetijstvo. Sodišče Komisiji priporoča tudi, da se z državami članicami posvetuje v zvezi s prihodnostjo „črne liste“. 4.11.2004
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/3 INTRODUCTION 1. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/3 UVOD 1.
The European Union spends more than 40 billion euro annually on the common agricultural policy (CAP). 
Evropska unija na leto porabi več kot 40 milijard EUR za skupno kmetijsko politiko (SKP).
Responsibility for managing this expenditure is shared between the Commission and Member States. 
Odgovornost za upravljanje teh odhodkov si delijo Komisija in države članice.
This report examines one aspect of shared management: notification and recovery of sums irregularly paid to traders, farmers and other recipients of spending under the CAP. 
To poročilo obravnava en vidik deljenega upravljanja: prijava in izterjava zneskov, ki so bili nepravilno izplačani gospodarskim subjektom, kmetom in drugim prejemnikom proračunskih sredstev iz SKP.
Almost all payments under the CAP are made by paying agencies in the Member States. 
Skoraj vsa plačila iz naslova SKP opravijo plačilne agencije v državah članicah.
Member States are required to check that payments are properly made; to notify the Commission of irregular payments made and debts owing; and to recover sums improperly paid. 
Države članice morajo preveriti, ali so plačila opravljena pravilno, obvestiti Komisijo o nepravilnih plačilih in dolgovanih zneskih ter izterjati nepravilno izplačane zneske.
The cost of irregular payments which Member States do not recover is borne by the Community budget unless non-recovery is the result of negligence by the Member State concerned. 
Stroški nepravilnih plačil, ki jih države članice ne izterjajo, bremenijo proračun Skupnosti, razen če znesek ni bil izterjan zaradi malomarnosti zadevne države članice.
In that case the cost of irregular payments lies with the Member State concerned. 
V tem primeru stroške nepravilnih plačil nosi zadevna država članica.
Illustration 1 shows how the system works. 
Prikaz 1 prikazuje delovanje sistema.
C 269/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 4. 
C 269/4 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.11.2004 4.
According to the CommissionŐs Anti-fraud Office (OLAF), at the end of 2002 the cumulative total of irregular CAP payments notified by the Member States to the Commission since 1971 was 3,1 billion euro. 
Po podatkih Urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF), ki deluje v okviru Komisije, je konec leta 2002 kumulativna vsota nepravilnih plačil iz naslova SKP, ki so jih države članice prijavile Komisiji od leta 1971, znašala 3,1 milijarde EUR.
Table 1 details the composition of this amount and of the amount which remains to be recovered. 
Tabela 1 prikazuje sestavo te vsote in znesek, ki ga je treba še izterjati.
Table 1 Analysis of irregularities notified to the Commission since 1971 ANALYSIS Reported irregularities 9. 
Tabela 1 Analiza nepravilnosti, prijavljenih Komisiji od leta 1971 ANALIZA Prijavljene nepravilnosti 9.
As at 31 December 2002 irregular payments notified since 1971 and recorded in the relevant Commission database (External Communications Registry (ECR)) amounted to 3 139 million euro (2). 
Na dan 31. decembra 2002 so nepravilna plačila, prijavljena od leta 1971 in evidentirana v ustrezni zbirki podatkov Komisije (register zunanjih obvestil – External Communications Registry, ECR) skupaj znašala 3 139 milijonov EUR (2).
The amount recorded as Ôto be recoveredŐ at the same date was 2 349 million euro. 
Znesek, ki je bil na isti datum zabeležen kot „znesek za izterjavo“, je znašal 2 349 milijonov EUR.
In other words 25 % of irregular payments made since 1971 had either been recovered from beneficiaries, charged to Member States or written off against the budget. 
Z drugimi besedami, 25 % nepravilnih plačil, opravljenih od leta 1971, je bilo bodisi izterjanih od prejemnikov bodisi obračunanih v breme držav članic ali odpisanih od proračuna.
Table 2 shows the value of irregular payments notified and the cumulative rate of recovery by Member States (3). 
Tabela 2 prikazuje vrednost prijavljenih nepravilnih plačil in kumulativno stopnjo izterjav po državah članicah (3).
The figures are dominated, and distorted, by those for Italy, which: Irregularities notified after payment Amount recovered from claimants Amount charged to Member States Amount written off against the EAGGF Amount to be recovered (A) (million euro) 3 139 538 142 110 2 349 Position as at 31 December 2002. 
Tabela 2 Nepravilnosti, odkrite po izplačilu, in stopnje izterjave (1971–2002) Nepravilnosti, prijavljene po izplačilu Znesek, ki je bil izterjan od upravičencev Znesek, obračunan v breme držav članic Znesek, odpisan EKUJS-u Znesek, ki ga je treba izterjati (1) (v milijonih eurov) 3 139 538 142 110 2 349 Stanje na dan 31. decembra 2002.
(A) Member States estimated that 46 % of this amount was realistically recoverable Source: OLAF ECR database 5. 
(1) Države članice so ocenile, da je od tega zneska realno izterljivih 46 %. Vir: OLAF, baza podatkov ECR.
Member States are also required to inform the Commission (OLAF) if any recipients of CAP monies have received irregular payments totalling over 100 000 euro in a year - the ÔblacklistŐ (1). 
Države članice morajo obvestiti Komisijo (OLAF), če so kateri prejemniki denarnih sredstev iz naslova SKP prejeli nepravilna plačila, ki skupaj znašajo več kot 100 000 EUR letno – „črna lista“ (1).
The objective of this audit was to assess the role of the Commission and Member States in the management and monitoring of recoveries of irregular CAP payments. 
Cilj te revizije je bil oceniti vlogo Komisije in držav članic pri upravljanju in spremljanju izterjave nepravilno izplačanih zneskov iz naslova SKP.
This involved consideration of whether, once frauds and irregularities had been detected, Member States correctly notified cases to the Commission, established related debts and took recovery action. 
V ta namen je bilo treba preučiti, ali države članice po odkritju goljufij in nepravilnosti pravilno obveščajo Komisijo o teh primerih, ugotavljajo povezane dolgove in sprejemajo ukrepe za izterjavo.
The audit did not examine how well Member StatesŐ control and fraud investigation agencies detect fraud and irregularities. (a) (b) has reported 55 % of the irregular payments concerned (see however paragraph 24); has the lowest cumulative rate of recovery (10 % of irregular payments made since 1971). Table 2 Irregularities detected after payment and recovery rates (1971 to 2002) 7. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) The Court examined: what the information provided shows about the extent, nature and causes of irregularities; whether Member States and the Commission take appropriate action to recover or write off irregular payments; whether the arrangements for providing information about irregularities are satisfactory; whether the ÔblacklistŐ works effectively; how the information on irregular payments compares with that on debts. 
Revizija pa ni preverjala, kako uspešno agencije držav članic za nadzor in preiskave goljufij odkrivajo goljufije in nepravilnosti. DČ Zneski, odkriti po izplačilu IT1 735 DE 403 ES 264 BE 100 AT 8 PT 50 SE 1 FR 159 UK 122 EL 131 NL 84 IE 39 DK 40 FI 1 LU pm Skupaj 3 139 Izterjani zneski 173 40 35 15 2 13 0 58 49 54 47 23 28 1 pm 537 % kumulativne stopnje izterjave 10 10 13 15 22 25 36 36 40 41 56 58 71 90 pm 17 7. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Sodišče je preverilo: kaj kažejo predloženi podatki o obsegu, naravi in vzrokih nepravilnosti; ali države članice in Komisija sprejemajo ustrezne ukrepe za izterjavo ali odpis nepravilnih plačil; ali so ureditve za pošiljanje informacij o nepravilnostih zadovoljive; ali je „črna lista“ učinkovita; primerjavo podatkov o nepravilnih plačilih in dolgovih.
Member States: Denmark, Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and the United Kingdom. 
8. vah članicah: na Danskem, v Nemčiji, Grčiji, Španiji, Franciji, na Irskem, v Italiji, na Portugalskem in v Združenem kraljestvu.
Situation at 31 December 2002. 
Stanje na dan 31. decembra 2002.
NB: Figures rounded to 1 000 000 euro. 
Pozor: Številke so zaokrožene na 1 000 000 eurov.
Source: OLAF ECR database. 
Vir: OLAF, baza podatkov ECR.
The audit was carried out at the Commission and in nine Member State Amounts detected after payment Amount recovered Cumulative recovery rate (%) 10 10 13 15 22 25 36 36 40 41 56 58 71 90 p.m. 17 IT1 735 DE 403 ES 264 BE 100 AT 8 PT 50 SE 1 FR 159 UK 122 EL 131 NL 84 IE 39 DK 40 FI 1 (1) Council Regulation (EC) No 1469/95 of 22 June 1995 (OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 
Revizija je bila opravljena pri Komisiji in v devetih drža-(1) Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1469/95 z dne 22. junija 1995 (UL L 145, 29.6.1995, str.
(2) A further 1 144 million euro detected before payment (and unpaid) are also recorded in the ECR. 
(2) Nadaljnjih 1 144 milijonov EUR, odkritih pred izplačilom (in neizplačanih), je tudi evidentiranih v ECR.
(3) These figures should be treated with caution for the reasons detailed in paragraphs 21 to 32. 
(3) Te številke je treba obravnavati previdno iz razlogov, obrazloženih v odstavkih 21 do 32.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/5 11. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/5 11.
As at 31 December 2002, 21 % of the debts date back 12. 
Na dan 31. decembra 2002 je 21 % dolgov nastalo pred 12.
Illustration 3 shows the main budget headings in which prior to 1994 (see lllustration 2). reported irregularities occur. 
Prikaz 3 prikazuje glavne proračunske postavke, v kate-letom 1994 (glej Prikaz 2). rih se pojavljajo prijavljene nepravilnosti.
Approximately a quarter are in the fruit and vegetable sector and between a quarter and a third in export refunds. 
Približno ena četrtina se jih pojavlja v sektorju sadja in zelenjave, med eno četrtino in eno tretjino pa pri izvoznih nadomestilih.
Illustration 2 Age of outstanding debts arising from irregularities Situation as at 31 December 2002. 
Prikaz 2 Starost neporavnanih dolgov, ki izhajajo iz nepravilnosti Dolg pred Stanje na dan 31. decembra 2002.
NB: Two high value cases, totalling 300 million euro, were reported by Italy in 2000. 
Pozor: Italija je leta 2000 prijavila dva primera z visokima zneskoma v skupni vrednosti 300 milijonov EUR.
Source: OLAF ECR database of irregularities reported under Regulation (EEC) No 595/91. 
Vir: OLAF, baza podatkov ECR o nepravilnostih, prijavljenih v skladu z Uredbo 595/91.
Illustration 3 Main budget headings for irregularities recorded in the ECR (1971 to 2002) As at 31 December 2002. 
Prikaz 3 Glavne proračunske postavke za nepravilnosti, evidentirane v ECR (1971–2002) Podporni ukrepi v sektorju oljnic Pomoč za porabo olivnega olja Drugo Stanje na dan 31. decembra 2002.
Source: OLAF ECR database. 
Vir : OLAF, baza podatkov ECR.
C 269/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 13. 
C 269/6 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.11.2004 13.
Irregular payments are relatively infrequently reported in the areas of spending subject to the Integrated Administration and Control System (essentially area aid and animal premium payments). 
Nepravilna plačila so precej redko prijavljena na področjih proračunskega financiranja, za katera velja integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem (IACS) (predvsem pomoč na površino in plačila živalskih premij).
This reflects the fact that: (a) IACS claims are subject to a 100 % check of all claims by means of computerised cross-checks and comparisons with independent data and sample checks on the spot, before payments are made. 
Razlog za to izhaja iz dejstva, da: (a) za zahtevke iz IACS velja 100-odstotno preverjanje vseh zahtevkov z računalniško podprtim navzkrižnim preverjanjem ter primerjavo z neodvisnimi podatki in pregledi vzorca na kraju samem, preden se opravijo plačila.
Discovery of an irregularity therefore means claims are blocked before payment; (b) where, exceptionally, irregularities are discovered after payment, the amount concerned will often be less than 4 000 euro and paying agencies can often make recovery by deduction from later claims; and (c) administrative penalties are built into the regulations, enabling paying agencies to take appropriate action when false claims are identified, without going to a court of law. 
Če se odkrije nepravilnost, se torej zahtevek blokira pred plačilom; (b) če se izjemoma nepravilnosti odkrijejo po plačilu, je zadevni znesek običajno manjši od 4 000 EUR in ga plačilne agencije pogosto lahko izterjajo tako, da ga odbijejo od kasnejših zahtevkov; in (c) upravne kazni so določene s predpisi, kar plačilnim agencijam omogoča, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe, ko odkrijejo lažne terjatve, ne da bi se za to morale obrniti na sodišče.
Irregularity cases, 29 notified, accounted for 40 % of the total amount to be recovered at 31 December 2002. 
Od primerov prijavljenih nepravilnosti jih je 29 zajemalo 40 % celotnega zneska za izterjavo na dan 31. decembra 2002.
They are listed in Annex A. 15. 
Ti primeri so navedeni v Prilogi A. 15.
It is impossible to estimate accurately the rate of irregularities affecting the CAP. 
Nemogoče je natančno oceniti stopnjo nepravilnosti, ki vplivajo na SKP.
However on the basis of reported information: (a) the value of irregularities from 1994 to 2001 represents between 0,3 % and 1,4 % of the EU agricultural budget for the year in which they were notified. 
Na podlagi prijavljenih podatkov pa je mogoče ugotoviti: (a) Vrednost nepravilnosti od leta 1994 do 2001 je med 0,3 % in 1,4 % kmetijskega proračuna EU za leto, v katerem so te prijavljene.
If Italy is excluded they represent 0,5 % or less (see Table 3). (b) irregularities in the budget headings most heavily affected (fruit and vegetables and export refunds - see Illustration 3) represent 1,7 % of spending on these headings in years 1994 to 2001. 
Če izvzamemo Italijo, te vrednosti dosegajo 0,5 % ali manj (glej Tabelo 3). (b) Nepravilnosti v najbolj prizadetih proračunskih postavkah (sadje in zelenjava ter izvozna nadomestila – glej Prikaz 3) predstavljajo 1,7 % porabljenih sredstev za te postavke med letoma 1994 in 2001.
Expenditure declared EAGGF Guarantee Irregularities notified Percentage of annual budget EAGGF expenditure declared excluding Italy Irregularities notified excluding Italy Irregularities notified excluding Italy 1994 33 593 461,2 1,4 30 000 136,6 0,5 1995 35 654 227,6 0,6 31 285 139,5 0,4 1996 39 062 251,7 0,6 34 631 86,6 0,3 1997 40 884 154,6 0,4 35 559 124,1 0,3 1998 38 857 263,1 0,7 34 708 100,4 0,3 1999 40 726 224,0 0,6 35 709 163,9 0,5 2000 40 411 467,3 1,2 35 874 166,6 0,5 2001 41 594 104,1 0,3 36 124 65,3 0,2 (million euro) 2002 42 711 198,0 0,5 37 022 134,1 0,4 Table 3 Trend in value of reported irregularities Source: Table 4.6 of the 2002 ECAŐs annual report and OLAF ECR database as at 31 December 2002 (which is not consistent with figures given in the Commission Report 2002 on the Fight against Fraud). 
Izkazani stroški za EKUJS Jamstva Prijavljene nepravilnosti Odstotek letnega proračuna Izkazani stroški za EKUJS, razen Italije Prijavljene nepravilnosti, razen Italije Odstotek letnega proračuna, razen Italije 1994 33 593 461,2 1,4 30 000 136,6 0,5 1995 35 654 227,6 0,6 31 285 139,5 0,4 1996 39 062 251,7 0,6 34 631 86,6 0,3 1997 40 884 154,6 0,4 35 559 124,1 0,3 1998 38 857 263,1 0,7 34 708 100,4 0,3 1999 40 726 224,0 0,6 35 709 163,9 0,5 2000 40 411 467,3 1,2 35 874 166,6 0,5 2001 41 594 104,1 0,3 36 124 65,3 0,2 (v milijonih eurov) 2002 42 711 198,0 0,5 37 022 134,1 0,4 Tabela 3 Gibanje vrednosti prijavljenih nepravilnosti Vir: Tabela 4.6 letnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča za leto 2002 in OLAF-ova baza podatkov ECR na dan 31. decembra 2002 (kar pa ni skladno s številkami v Poročilu Komisije 2002 o boju proti goljufijam).
Notification of irregularities: who does what? 
Prijava nepravilnosti: Kdo je za kaj zadolžen?
Member States are required to notify the Commission quarterly (1) of all irregular payments in excess of 4 000 euro which Ôhave been the subject of the primary administrative or judicial findings of factŐ (2). 
Države članice morajo Komisiji vsako četrtletje (1) prijaviti vsa nepravilna plačila, ki presegajo 4 000 EUR ter ki „so bila predmet primarnih upravnih ali sodnih ugotovitev o dejstvih“ (2).
The notification should contain a range of quantitative and qualitative information on the fraud such as the amount involved, budget heading, type of fraud and method of detection etc. All of this information is entered in the ECR. 
Prijava mora vsebovati vrsto kvantitativnih in kvalitativnih podatkov o goljufiji, kot je znesek, proračunska postavka, vrsta goljufije, metoda odkrivanja itd. Vsi ti podatki se vnesejo v ECR.
The Commission has developed the notion of primary administrative or judicial findings in legislation and working documents. 
Komisija je v zakonodaji in delovnih dokumentih opredelila pojem temeljnih upravnih ali sodnih ugotovitev.
Despite this, Member States interpret the requirement differently. 
Kljub temu pa si države članice zahtevo razlagajo različno.
(1) In practice OLAF. 
(1) V praksi OLAF.
(2) Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991 (OJ L 67, 14.3.1991, p. 
(2) Člen 3 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 595/91 z dne 4. marca 1991 (UL L 67, 14.3.1991, str.
Member States must also notify the Commission on a quarterly basis of the steps they have taken following notification of the irregularities including amounts recovered, reasons for abandonment of recovery etc (3). 
Poleg tega morajo države članice Komisijo vsako četrtletje obvestiti o ukrepih, ki so jih sprejele po prijavi nepravilnosti, vključno z izterjanimi zneski, razlogi za opustitev izterjave itd. (3).
Where a Member State considers that an amount cannot be totally recovered it must inform the Commission whether it considers that the charge should be borne by EU or by the Member State (4) and why. 
Kadar država članica meni, da zneska ni mogoče v celoti izterjati, mora obvestiti Komisijo, ali meni, da bi znesek morala prevzeti EU ali država članica (4), in zakaj.
OLAF enters the data on notifications into the ECR. 
OLAF vnese podatke o prijavah v ECR.
The ECR database has been successively managed by the CommissionŐs Directorate-General for Agriculture, the CommissionŐs Anti-fraud Unit (UCLAF) and, since 1995, OLAF. 
Zbirko podatkov ECR so zaporedno vodili Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo Komisije Evropskih skupnosti, Enota Komisije za koordinacijo preprečevanja goljufij (UCLAF) in od leta 1995 OLAF.
(3) Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991. 
(3) Člen 5(1) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 595/91 z dne 4. marca 1991.
(4) Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991. 
(4) Člen 5(2) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 595/91 z dne 4. marca 1991.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/7 Notification of irregularities: delays, gaps and inconsistencies 21. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/7 Prijava nepravilnosti: zamude, pomanjkljivosti in neskladnosti 21.
Member States are required to report irregularities within two months of the end of each quarter; however, during 2002, some 65 % (2 147 communications) were not reported on time (1). 
Države članice morajo nepravilnosti prijaviti v dveh mesecih po koncu vsakega četrtletja, vendar v letu 2002 približno 65 % sporočil (2 147 sporočil) ni bilo prijavljenih pravočasno (1).
Member States have, on average, notified the Commission of irregularities more than one year after discovery (2). 
Države članice so Komisijo obvestile o nepravilnostih povprečno več kot eno leto po odkritju (2).
Member StatesŐ individual average speed of notification ranged from eight months (Portugal) to 23 months (Luxembourg) (see Illustration 4). 
Povprečna hitrost poročanja posameznih držav članic je bila od 8 mesecev (Portugalska) do 23 mesecev (Luksemburg) (glej Prikaz 4).