natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The aggregated EU inventory reports additional data on emissions and removals from forest management, grasslands, croplands, wetlands and settlements, although this is not mandatory under the Kyoto Protocol. 
V zbirno evidenco EU se sporočajo dodatni podatki o emisijah in odvzemih, povezanih z gospodarjenjem z gozdovi, travišči, zemljišči, namenjenimi pridelovanju poljščin, mokrišči in naselji, čeprav to v okviru Kjotskega protokola ni obvezno.
Under the new LULUCF Regulation, adopted following the entry into force of the Paris Agreement (see paragraph 12) emissions and removals from all these accounting categories will be part of the mandatory reporting requirements. 
V skladu z novo uredbo LULUCF, ki je bila sprejeta po začetku veljavnosti Pariškega sporazuma (glej odstavek 12), bodo emisije in odvzemi iz vseh teh obračunskih kategorij del zahtev glede obveznega poročanja.
21 Box 3 Data from satellites and from in-situ monitoring stations can help verify emission estimates Activity-based greenhouse emission estimations can be verified through atmospheric observations using a combination of satellite monitoring, in situ monitoring stations and modelling. 
21 informacije o emisijah in odvzemih za sektorje, v katerih so ocene običajno manj zanesljive (glej okvir 3). Okvir 3 Podatki satelitov in postaj za spremljanje na kraju samem lahko pripomorejo k preverjanju ocen emisij Ocene emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki temeljijo na dejavnostih, je mogoče preveriti z opazovanjem ozračja, pri čemer se uporabi kombinacija satelitskega spremljanja, spremljanja nadzornih postaj na kraju samem in modeliranja.
Projects are ongoing in the EU (e.g. two projects called “VERIFY” and “ICOS”) to improve the quality of monitoring data. 
V EU se izvajajo projekti (npr. projekta VERIFY in ICOS) za izboljšanje kakovosti podatkov o spremljanju.
This could potentially enable the EU to perform verifications using this data. 
To bi morda lahko omogočilo EU, da te podatke uporabi za izvedbo preverjanj.
Satellite atmospheric monitoring services can provide information on greenhouse gas concentrations and on activity data. 
Storitve satelitskega spremljanja ozračja lahko zagotovijo informacije o koncentracijah toplogrednih plinov in podatkih o dejavnostih.
Actual greenhouse gas emissions, and sources of emissions, can be determined by different modelling procedures. 
Dejanske emisije toplogrednih plinov in viri emisij se lahko določijo z različnimi postopki modeliranja.
In situ monitoring stations locally measure greenhouse gas emissions and removals and their flow with relatively high accuracy (compared to estimates). 
Nadzorne postaje na kraju samem lokalno merijo emisije in odvzeme toplogrednih plinov ter njihov pretok z relativno veliko natančnostjo (v primerjavi z ocenami).
This may produce new information which can improve estimations for the agriculture, waste and LULUCF sectors, estimations which have a high degree of uncertainty. 
Tako se lahko pridobijo nove informacije, s katerimi se lahko izboljšajo ocene za sektorje kmetijstva, odpadkov in LULUCF, za katere je značilna visoka stopnja negotovosti.
Land cover-based monitoring using satellites such as Copernicus, and other remote sensing techniques is possible, and encouraged by the new LULUCF regulation (2018/841). 
Spremljanje na podlagi pokrovnosti tal z uporabo satelitov, kot je Copernicus, in drugimi tehnikami daljinskega zaznavanja je mogoče in se spodbuja v novi uredbi LULUCF (2018/841).
34 One Member State (the United Kingdom) has used satellite data to verify data concerning the LULUCF sector; in particular, changes in forest coverage. 
34 Ena država članica (Združeno kraljestvo) je uporabila satelitske podatke za preverjanje podatkov v zvezi s sektorjem LULUCF, zlasti spremembe glede gozdnatosti.
It also performed verification of emission estimates using in situ monitoring data for certain gases in the national inventory. 
Za določene pline v nacionalni evidenci je opravila tudi preverjanje ocen emisij z uporabo podatkov o spremljanju na kraju samem.
These verifications led to better estimation of methane and certain hydrofluorocarbon emissions, which had been overestimated in the inventories, and of nitrous oxide emissions, which had been underestimated. 
Posledica teh preverjanj so bile boljše ocene emisij metana in nekaterih emisij fluoriranih ogljikovodikov, ki so bile v evidencah ocenjene previsoko, in emisij dušikovega oksida, ki so bile ocenjene prenizko.
The Commission does not currently use satellite data to verify emission estimates or LULUCF data. 
Komisija trenutno ne uporablja satelitskih podatkov za preverjanje ocen emisij ali podatkov o LULUCF.
The EU greenhouse gas inventory has improved over time 35 The Commission reviewers draft observations when their checks identify instances where the Member States’ estimations of greenhouse gas emissions are not in line with the reporting requirements, or where there are potential over-or underestimations of emissions. 
Evidenca toplogrednih plinov EU se je s časom izboljšala 35 Pregledovalci iz Komisije pripravijo osnutke opažanj, ko v pregledih odkrijejo primere, v katerih ocene emisij toplogrednih plinov držav članic niso v skladu z zahtevami glede poročanja ali v katerih obstaja možnost previsokih ali prenizkih ocen emisij.
36 Member States either reply to such observations during the review, or revise their estimates. 
36 Države članice odgovorijo na ta opažanja med pregledom ali pa revidirajo svoje ocene.
If the Member States’ replies do not address the issues raised by the reviewers, the reviewers propose technical corrections of the estimates (adjusted figures meant to replace the original estimates) or recommendations for future improvements. 
Če države članice v odgovorih ne obravnavajo zadev, ki jih izpostavijo pregledovalci, ti predlagajo tehnične popravke ocen (prilagojene ocene, ki naj nadomestijo prvotne ocene) ali dajo priporočila za prihodnje izboljšave.
37 For our sample of Member States, most of the observations raised during the Commission review were solved during the review process and in 2018 did not require Member States to correct estimates. 
37 Kar zadeva vzorec držav članic, ki ga je preučilo Sodišče, je bila večina opažanj, izraženih med pregledom Komisije, pojasnjena med postopkom pregleda in leta 2018 državam članicam ni bilo treba popraviti ocen.
38 The methodology for calculating greenhouse gas emissions (see Box 1) has an inherent degree of uncertainty. 
38 Metodologija za izračun emisij toplogrednih plinov (glej okvir 1) ima že sama po sebi določeno stopnjo negotovosti.
The Member States reported an increased use of more precise (“higher tier”) estimation methodologies for their most significant emission sources. 
Države članice so za svoje najpomembnejše vire emisij poročale o povečani uporabi natančnejših („višje stopnje”) metodologij za ocenjevanje.
Overall, the uncertainty of aggregated EU inventory decreased from 6.2 % in 2016 to 5.8 % in 2018. 
Na splošno se je negotovost glede zbirne evidence EU zmanjšala s 6,2 % v letu 2016 na 5,8 % v letu 2018.
The UNFCCC also noted the Commission’s progress in addressing the recommendations for the EU inventory raised in its previous review reports. 
Tudi UNFCCC je opazil napredek Komisije pri obravnavi priporočil za evidence EU, danih v njegovih predhodnih poročilih o pregledih.
39 The Commission (DG CLIMA) and the EEA took various measures to improve the quality of the Member States’ inventories: (a) organising regular working group meetings and capacity-building seminars with other Commission Directorates-General and the Member States to support the review process and help Member States improve their data; (b) organising a number of capacity-building visits to interested Member States28; (c) drafting guidance documents, and encouraging knowledge-sharing on specific methodological issues; (d) setting up a system for reviewing and improving the aggregated EU inventory, with the help of Member State and other experts. 
39 Komisija (GD CLIMA) in EEA sta sprejeli različne ukrepe za izboljšanje kakovosti evidenc držav članic, tako da: (a) sta organizirali redne sestanke delovne skupine in seminarje za krepitev zmogljivosti z drugimi generalnimi direktorati Komisije in državami članicami, da bi podprli postopek pregleda in pomagali državam članicam izboljšati njihove podatke, (b) sta organizirali več obiskov za krepitev zmogljivosti v zainteresiranih državah članicah28, (c) pripravljata dokumente s smernicami in spodbujata izmenjavo znanja o specifičnih metodoloških zadevah, (d) sta vzpostavili sistem za pregledovanje in izboljšanje zbirne evidence EU s pomočjo držav članic in drugih strokovnjakov.
40 The six Member States we surveyed replied that the Commission’s efforts to promote knowledge-sharing and guidance had been useful, and that the EU’s review and associated guidance had contributed to improving their inventories. 
40 Šest držav članic, vključenih v anketo Sodišča, je odgovorilo, da so bila prizadevanja Komisije za spodbujanje izmenjave znanja in smernic koristna ter da so pregled EU in s tem povezane smernice prispevali k izboljšanju njihovih evidenc.
They also 22 28 Bulgaria (2018), Estonia (2018), Cyprus (2018), Malta (2017 and 2018). 
22 28 Bolgarija (2018), Estonija (2018), Ciper (2018), Malta (2017 in 2018).
23 identified areas where they considered that additional guidance was needed (see Box 4). 
23 Opredelile so tudi področja, za katera so bile po njihovem mnenju potrebne dodatne smernice (glej okvir 4).
Box 4 Support for additional guidance and information Certain Member States stated that additional guidance and information from the Commission would be useful in one or more of the following areas: (a) accounting for gas leaks in international territories, by applying improved methods in respect of gas transport though pipelines; (b) developing methods for emissions related to biogas installations using livestock manure, and related to the combustion of liquid fuels; (c) improving statistical data on land use change; (d) improving scientific information on carbon stored in the soil; (e) improving the comparability of the databases of fluorinated gases. 
Okvir 4 Podpora za dodatne smernice in informacije Nekatere države članice so navedle, da bi bile dodatne smernice in informacije Komisije koristne na enem ali več naslednjih področjih: (a) upoštevanje uhajanja plina na mednarodnih ozemljih tako, da se uporabijo izboljšane metode za prenos plina po plinovodih; (b) razvoj metod za emisije, povezane z obrati za pridobivanje bioplina, v katerih se uporablja živalski gnoj, in z zgorevanjem tekočih goriv; (c) izboljšanje statističnih podatkov o spremembi rabe zemljišč; (d) izboljšanje znanstvenih informacij o ogljiku, shranjenem v tleh; (e) izboljšanje primerljivosti podatkovnih zbirk o fluoriranih plinih.
The EU needs better insight into future greenhouse gas emission reductions 41 We examined the operation and the results of the Commission quality review of the EU and Member States’ projections of future greenhouse gas emissions. 
EU potrebuje boljši vpogled v prihodnja zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov 41 Sodišče je preučilo potek in rezultate pregleda kakovosti, ki ga je opravila Komisija v zvezi s projekcijami EU in držav članic glede prihodnjih emisij toplogrednih plinov.
We also assessed the extent to which the reported emission data is included in the 2020 and 2030 targets for the EU as a whole. 
Ocenilo je tudi, v kolikšni meri so sporočeni podatki o emisijah vključeni v cilje EU kot celote za leti 2020 in 2030.
In addition, we examined the Commission work on EU strategies, policies and measures for emission reductions. 
Poleg tega je preučilo delo Komisije v zvezi s strategijami, politikami in ukrepi EU za zmanjšanje emisij.
The Commission and EEA help Member States improve the quality of their projections 42 Projections are an important part of the progress assessment and policy development cycle. 
Komisija in EEA pomagata državam članicam izboljšati kakovost njihovih projekcij 42 Projekcije so pomemben del cikla ocenjevanja napredka in razvoja politik.
They can indicate the need for additional mitigation policies and measures in order to reach the intended reduction target (see paragraph 10). 
Pokažejo lahko potrebo po dodatnih politikah in ukrepih za blažitev podnebnih sprememb, da bi se dosegel zastavljeni cilj zmanjšanja (glej odstavek 10).
Member States and the EU build their projections using modelling tools, based on assumptions and parameters, which include inter alia the effects of all their policies and measures on emissions (e.g. including policies linked to infrastructure and transport development). 
Države članice in EU svoje projekcije oblikujejo z orodji za modeliranje, ki temeljijo na predpostavkah in parametrih, ki med drugim vključujejo učinke vseh njihovih politik in ukrepov na emisije (tudi npr. politike, povezane z razvojem infrastrukture in prometa).
43 The Commission, assisted by the EEA, reviews and adds up Member States projections to give aggregated EU projections. 
43 Komisija s pomočjo agencije EEA pregleda in združi projekcije držav članic in tako dobi združene projekcije EU.
We checked the design and operation of the quality review system to ensure that the projections comply with the international requirements, and improve over time. 
Sodišče je pregledalo zasnovo in delovanje sistema za pregled kakovosti, ki naj bi zagotavljal, da projekcije izpolnjujejo mednarodne zahteve in da se sčasoma izboljšajo.
44 The Commission review of national projections in our sample of six Member States addressed all the quality principles identified in UNFCCC guidelines. 
44 Komisija je v pregledu nacionalnih projekcij šestih držav članic v vzorcu Sodišča obravnavala vsa načela kakovosti iz smernic konvencije UNFCCC.
In general, the reviewers reported on these criteria in a clear manner and communicated their findings to the Member States transparently, taking into account the findings of previous Commission reviews. 
Na splošno so pregledovalci o teh merilih jasno poročali in o svojih ugotovitvah pregledno obveščali države članice, pri tem pa so upoštevali ugotovitve prejšnjih pregledov Komisije.
45 The Commission review’s results for the six Member States included in our sample showed that only one Member State needed to make a general error correction in 2017, compared to five in 2015. 
45 Rezultati pregleda Komisije za šest držav članic iz vzorca Sodišča so pokazali, da je morala leta 2017 le ena država članica izvesti popravek splošne napake, medtem ko jih je bilo v letu 2015 pet.
Commission checks were more thorough in 2017 than in 2015, and the number of findings arising in the review decreased marginally over the same period (see Figure 4). 
Pregledi Komisije so bili leta 2017 temeljitejši kot leta 2015, število ugotovitev, ugotovljenih pri pregledu, pa se je v istem obdobju nekoliko zmanjšalo (glej sliko 4).
The UNFCCC, in its reviews of national communications and biennial reports, made fewer recommendations in 2017 than in 2015 on Member States’ projections, indicating that these had improved. 
Konvencija UNFCCC je v svojih pregledih državnih poročil in dvoletnih poročil glede projekcij držav članic leta 2017 dala manj priporočil kot leta 2015, kar dokazuje, da so se te izboljšale.
Figure 4 – Improvements in projections for the six Member States in our sample Member States in our sample Results of Commission review of national projections Observations 117 in 2015 114 in 2017 General error corrections Five Member States in 2015 One Member State in 2017 Czechia Germany France Italy Poland Romania Member States’ projection data submitted for review 24 Source: Commission review results, as communicated to Member States. 46 Five of the six Member States stated in reply to our questionnaire that they considered that the Commission’s and the European Environment Agency’s guidance and assistance (see Box 5) had indeed facilitated improvements in national projections. 
Slika 4 – Izboljšave v projekcijah za šest držav članic v vzorcu Sodišča Države članice v vzorcu Sodišča Rezultati pregleda nacionalnih projekcij, ki ga je opravila Komisija opažanja 117 leta 2015 114 leta 2017 popravki splošnih napak pet držav članic leta 2015 ena država članica leta 2017 Češka Nemčija Francija Italija Poljska Romunija Podatki o projekcijah držav članic, predloženi v pregled 24 Vir: rezultati pregleda Komisije, kot so bili sporočeni državam članicam 46 Pet od šestih držav članic je v odgovoru iz vprašalnika Sodišča navedlo, da so smernice in pomoč Komisije in Evropske agencije za okolje (glej okvir 5) po njihovem mnenju dejansko olajšale izboljšave nacionalnih projekcij.
The Commission did not assess the risk of significant deviations from the EU reference scenario 47 The EU projections aggregate Member State projections (based on each Member State’s assumptions). 
Komisija ni ocenila tveganja bistvenih odstopanj od referenčnega scenarija EU 47 Projekcije EU združujejo projekcije držav članic (na podlagi predpostavk posameznih držav članic).
The Commission also produces separate projections based on its own assumptions29 regarding the evolution of the EU energy and transport systems and their impact on greenhouse gas emissions. 
Komisija pripravlja tudi ločene projekcije na podlagi svojih predpostavk29 v zvezi z razvojem energetskega in prevoznega sistema EU ter njunega vpliva na emisije toplogrednih plinov.
These include specific sections on emission trends not related to energy, and on the various interactions among policies in these sectors. 
Vanje so vključeni posebni oddelki o trendih emisij, ki niso povezane z energijo, in o različnem medsebojnem vplivu politik v teh sektorjih.
The Commission projections form the EU reference scenario. 
Projekcije Komisije tvorijo referenčni scenarij EU.
Based on the EU reference scenario and the greenhouse gas emission reduction objectives, the Commission assesses the need for additional EU mitigation policies and measures. 
Komisija na podlagi teh scenarijev in ciljev zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov oceni potrebo po dodatnih politikah in ukrepih za blažitev v EU.
48 The Commission produces the EU reference scenario30 for the future under the assumption of full enforcement of the current mitigation policies and measures, and achievement of the emission reductions proposed by these measures. 
48 Komisija pripravlja referenčni scenarij EU30 za prihodnost, temelječ na predpostavki, da bodo sedanje politike in ukrepi za blažitev podnebnih sprememb v celoti izvedeni in da bodo dosežena zmanjšanja emisij, ki so predlagana v teh ukrepih.
The information reported by the Commission to the UNFCCC indicates that the aggregated Member States’ projections beyond 2023 show lower emission reductions than the Commission’s 2016 reference scenario for the same period (see Figure 5). 
Glede na informacije, ki jih je Komisija sporočila konvenciji UNFCCC, združene projekcije držav članic za obdobje po letu 2023 kažejo manjše zmanjšanje emisij, kot ga za isto obdobje kaže referenčni scenarij Komisije iz leta 2016 (glej sliko 5).
29 The Commission consults all Member States when defining these assumptions. 
29 Komisija se pri opredelitvi teh predpostavk posvetuje z vsemi državami članicami.
30 The latest EU reference scenario is from 2016. 
30 Zadnji referenčni scenarij EU je iz leta 2016.
The previous one referred to 2013. 
Predhodni se je nanašal na leto 2013.
25 Box 5 Most Member States valued the Commission’s guidance on projections Member States can decide which methods, modelling tools, assumptions and parameters they use for compiling their national projections. 
25 Okvir 5 Večina držav članic je pozitivno ocenila smernice Komisije v zvezi s projekcijami Države članice se lahko odločijo, katere metode, orodja za modeliranje, predpostavke in parametre bodo uporabljale pri pripravi svojih nacionalnih projekcij.
However, common approaches are useful to ensure a higher level of consistency when projections are aggregated at EU level. 
Vendar so za zagotovitev večje stopnje skladnosti pri združevanju projekcij na ravni EU koristni skupni pristopi.
Every two years, the Commission develops a set of harmonised parameters. The Commission recommends that Member States use these parameters and their values. 
Komisija vsaki dve leti pripravi sklop usklajenih parametrov in državam članicam priporoča, naj te parametre in njihove vrednosti uporabljajo.
Ten of the 28 Member States used all of them. 
Vse parametre je uporabilo deset od 28 držav članic.
Five of the six Member States in our sample considered that EU guidance was useful and sufficient. 
Pet od šestih držav članic v vzorcu Sodišča je menilo, da so bile smernice EU uporabne in zadostne.
However, in their opinion, an EU modelling tool would add value and further improve the national projections. 
Toda po njihovem mnenju bi orodje EU za modeliranje prineslo dodano vrednost in bi še nadalje izboljšalo nacionalne projekcije.
The Commission is already testing a new modelling tool called POTEnCIA. 
Komisija že preizkuša novo orodje za modeliranje, imenovano POTEnCIA, in namerava državam članicam zagotoviti odprt dostop do njega.
Figure 5 – Commission projections in the 2016 EU Reference Scenario differ from aggregated Member States’ projections in the medium term 26 Mt CO2e 4 600 4 400 4 200 4 000 3 800 3 600 3 400 3 200 3 000 Projection of total aggregate emissions by Member States and by the Commission, with existing measures Target of -20 % in 2020 Target of -40 % in 2030 2020 Member States projections with existing measures 2035 2016 EU Reference Scenario 2025 2030 Source: European Union’s Seventh National Communication and Third Biennial Report to the UNFCCC (submitted in 2017). 
Slika 5 – Projekcije Komisije v referenčnem scenariju EU iz leta 2016 se razlikujejo od združenih srednjeročnih projekcij držav članic 26 Projekcija skupnih emisij držav članic in Komisije skupaj s sedanjimi ukrepi 4 600 Cilj Mt CO2e 4 400 4 200 4 000 3 800 3 600 3 400 3 200 3 000 –20 % do leta2020 Cilj –40% do leta 2030 2020 Projekcije držav članic s sedanjimi ukrepi 2025 2030 2035 Referenčni scenarij EU iz leta 2016 Vir: 7th National Communication & 3rd Biennial Report from the European Union under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (predloženo leta 2017) 49 EU je leta 2007 sprejela dogovor o trenutnih ciljih EU za zmanjšanje emisij do leta 2020 in cilj dosegla leta 2014.
We have already reported31 that the 2030 and 2050 targets will not be achieved without significant additional efforts (see also Figure 1). 
Sodišče je že poročalo31, da cilji za leti 2030 in 2050 ne bodo doseženi brez znatnih dodatnih prizadevanj (glej tudi sliko 1).
50 Beyond 2023, if the aggregated EU projections materialize, the EU mitigation policies and measures will need to be stricter than those proposed today based on the reference scenario. 
50 Če se bodo združene projekcije EU uresničile, bodo morali biti politike in ukrepi EU za blažitev posledic po letu 2023 strožji od tistih, ki se danes predlagajo na podlagi referenčnega scenarija.
The UNFCCC recommends the use of a sensitivity analysis for projections32. 
V konvenciji UNFCCC se za projekcije priporoča uporaba analize občutljivosti32.
The Commission makes such analyses when developing new policies. 
Komisija take analize opravi, kadar razvija nove politike.
31 Landscape review on EU action on energy and climate change, 2017. 
31 Panoramski pregled: Ukrepanje EU na področju energetike in podnebnih sprememb, 2017.
32 According to Report on the workshop on emission projections from Parties included in Annex I to the Convention (FCCC/SBSTA/2004/INF.15 of 20 October 2004), such analysis would be useful “because of the need to understand the impact of changes in key parameters and assumptions”. 
32 V skladu s poročilom Report on the workshop on emission projections from Parties included in Annex I to the Convention (FCCC/SBSTA/2004/INF.15 z dne 20. oktobra 2004) bi bile take analize koristne zaradi potrebe po razumevanju vpliva spremembe ključnih parametrov in predpostavk.