natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Both approaches are needed to provide a full picture of how rural development programmes support the rural environment. 
Za celotno sliko glede tega, kako programi razvoja podeželja podpirajo podeželsko okolje, sta potrebna oba pristopa.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Moreover, basic sub-measures do not per se deliver only limited environmental benefits. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Poleg tega osnovni podukrepi sami po sebi ne prinašajo samo omejenih okoljskih koristi.
If well designed, with relevant requirements and correctly implemented in relevant areas, even if not very demanding, they can bring great environmental benefits spread throughout a wide area. 
Če so dobro zasnovani, vsebujejo ustrezne zahteve in so pravilno izvedeni na zadevnih območjih, lahko, tudi če niso zelo zahtevni, prinesejo velike okoljske koristi, ki vplivajo na široko območje.
For the purpose of identifying the effectiveness of a measure, the evaluation may assess different agri-environment schemes separately, although environmental impacts are assessed at programme level, since they are the result of a complex mix of interventions and external factors. 
Za namene opredelitve učinkovitosti ukrepa se lahko različne kmetijsko-okoljske sheme ocenijo ločeno, čeprav so vplivi na okolje ocenjeni na ravni programa, saj so rezultat zapletene mešanice ukrepov in zunanjih dejavnikov.
The expected environmental benefits of the programme and axes have been established in the rural development programmes (RDP), and validated through ex ante evaluation. 
Pričakovane okoljske koristi programa in osi so bile določene v programih razvoja podeželja in potrjene s predhodno oceno.
Furthermore, the environment is a very complex system where most processes are very slow and environmental outcomes take time to develop. 
Poleg tega je okolje zelo kompleksen sistem, v katerem je večina procesov zelo počasnih in je za razvoj okoljskih rezultatov potreben čas.
Thus, for many sub-measures the actual environmental benefits can only be determined after a certain period of time. 
Zato so lahko dejanske koristi za okolje pri številnih podukrepih ugotovljene šele po določenem času.
The mid-term evaluation reports, submitted at the end of 2010, provide the first opportunity for the impact of RDP, including agri-environment schemes, to be assessed. 
Vmesna ocenjevalna poročila, predložena konec leta 2010, zagotavljajo prvo priložnost za oceno učinka programov razvoja podeželja, vključno s kmetijsko-okoljskimi shemami.
However, the implementation and expected results of agri-environment schemes are monitored on a regular basis and reported to the Commission annually in the Annual Progress Reports. 
Vendar pa se izvajanje in pričakovane rezultate kmetijsko-okoljskih shem redno spremlja in o njih letno poroča Komisiji v letnih poročilih o napredku.
Where appropriate, Member States are encouraged and expected to go beyond the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) and implement additional approaches and indicators to address programme-specific issues, such as those mentioned here. 
Kadar je primerno, se države članice spodbuja in se od njih pričakuje, da presežejo okvir skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja ter uvedejo dodatne pristope in kazalnike za obravnavanje vprašanj, vezanih na program, kot so vprašanja, navedena v tem dokumentu.
Best practice examples in this domain are shared via the evaluation expert network. 
Primeri najboljših praks na tem področju se izmenjujejo preko strokovne mreže za vrednotenje.
Moreover, the Commission continuously strives to refine appropriate methodologies and approaches. 
Poleg tega si Komisija nenehno prizadeva, da bi izboljšala ustrezne metodologije in pristope.
First and foremost, the CMEF needs to provide data that is standardised and comparable at EU level. 
Okvir za skupno spremljanje in vrednotenje mora v prvi vrsti zagotoviti podatke, ki so standardizirani in primerljivi na ravni EU.
While they can be very well suited to the conditions in individual Member States or regions, in many cases, if transferred to the EU level, specific monitoring practices would not deliver meaningful information. 
Čeprav so lahko posebne prakse spremljanja dobro prilagojene pogojem v posameznih državah članicah ali regijah, pa v številnih primerih, če so prenesene na raven EU, ne prinesejo smiselnih informacij.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Box 3 Please see the reply to point 27. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Okvir 3 Glej odgovor na točko 27.
The elements mentioned by the Court are part of the requirements/actions which farmers have committed to under a specific agri-environment scheme. 
Elementi, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, so del zahtev/ukrepov, h katerim so se kmetje zavezali v okviru določene kmetijsko-okoljske sheme.
A database collecting examples of interesting cases studies (rural development programme project database) developed jointly with the National Rural Networks will be published by the end of May 2011 on the European Network for Rural Development (EN RD) website. 
Podatkovna baza s primeri zanimivih študij primerov (baza projektov programov razvoja podeželja), ki je bila razvita skupaj z nacionalnimi podeželskimi omrežji, bo objavljena konec maja 2011 na spletni strani Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja.
In addition, a new series of brochures with examples funded under European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) has been launched (the first two are available from the EN RD). 
Poleg tega so bile izdane nove serije brošur s primeri (prvi dve sta na voljo pri Evropski mreži za razvoj podeželja), financirane v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP).
There is no current specific activity on agri-environment measures (AEM) but several activities contain AEM case studies. 
Trenutno se ne izvaja nobena posebna dejavnost glede kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov, vendar več dejavnosti vsebuje študije primerov kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
The most relevant activity is the analysis by the Thematic Working Group (TWG) 3 on Public Goods and Public Intervention, i.e. the context in which the AEM are implemented. 
Najpomembnejša dejavnost je analiza, ki jo tematska delovna skupina 3 opravlja na področju javnih dobrin in javnega posredovanja, tj. v okviru, v katerem se izvajajo kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi.
A case study on AEM, from which lessons can be learned, has been conducted by the TWG 3 in consultation with the EN RD Coordination committee. 
Tematska delovna skupina 3 je v posvetovanju z usklajevalnim odborom Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja izvedla študijo primera kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov, na podlagi katere se lahko pridobijo nove izkušnje.
A brochure will be produced. 
Pripravljena bo brošura.
Case studies by the TWG 4 on Delivery Mechanisms are conducted on the level of rural development programmes (RDP) in order to assess the whole delivery system, but the identification of difficulties in the implementation of AEM has received particular attention. 
Da bi ocenila celoten sistem izvajanja, izvaja tematska delovna skupina 4 študije primera na področju mehanizmov za izvajanje na ravni programov razvoja podeželja, vendar je bila posebna pozornost namenjena opredelitvi težav pri izvajanju kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
The Commission will put even more emphasis on the need to establish a stronger link between the implementation of the rural development measures and provision of adequate training and advice to the beneficiaries to improve farmers’ environmental awareness and their knowledge of agri-environment commitments needed for the better implementation of those commitments. 
Komisija bo še bolj poudarila potrebo po močnejši povezavi med izvajanjem kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov in zagotavljanjem ustreznega usposabljanja ter svetovanjem upravičencem za izboljšanje okoljske ozaveščenosti kmetov in njihovega znanja glede kmetijsko-okoljskih zavez, potrebnih za boljše izvajanje teh zavez.
Such training and advice should also be based on the experience gained from previous implementations of agri-environment operations. 
Takšno usposabljanje in svetovanje bi moralo temeljiti tudi na izkušnjah, pridobljenih pri izvaja-njih prejšnjih kmetijsko-okoljskih operacij.
Although Member States are not required to provide detailed figures and aid calculations in their rural development programmes (RDP), most Member States, upon the Commission’s request, delivered them to facilitate the assessment of the aid amounts proposed. 
Čeprav se od držav članic ne zahteva, da v svojih programih razvoja podeželja zagotovijo podrobne podatke in izračune pomoči, jih je na zahtevo Komisije večina držav članic predložila, da bi se pospešilo ocenjevanje predlaganih zneskov pomoči.
It is the responsibility of the Member States to ensure that appropriate expertise concerning the adequacy and accuracy of the calculations of payments is provided by independent services. 
Države članice so tiste, ki morajo zagotoviti, da neodvisne službe zagotovijo ustrezno strokovno znanje glede ustreznosti in natančnosti izračunov plačil.
The Commission relies on this kind of expertise, which is expected to take appropriate account of regional and local conditions. 
Komisija se zanaša na takšno strokovno znanje, od katerega pričakuje, da bo ustrezno upoštevalo regionalne in lokalne pogoje.
The Commission performs a general plausibility and consistency check of the calculation. 
Komisija izvaja splošno preverjanje verodostojnosti in doslednosti izračunov.
However, it does not engage in a full-fledged recalculation, as such an exercise would require substantial resources and expertise, including detailed knowledge of the national and regional specificities of Member States, and would not be in line with the principle of subsidiarity. 
Vendar ne izvaja celovitega ponovnega izračuna, saj bi to zahtevalo precejšnja sredstva in strokovno znanje, vključno s podrobnim poznavanjem nacionalnih in regionalnih posebnosti držav članic, ter ne bi bilo v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti.
The Commission does not undertake systematic controls (recalculation) of those calculations. However, in cases of doubts concerning aid amounts proposed, Member States were asked to provide detailed information on calculations and revise them if necessary. 
Komisija ne izvaja sistematičnega nadzora (ponovnega izračuna) teh izračunov. Vendar so bile v primerih dvoma glede predlaganih zneskov pomoči države članice pozvane, da predložijo podrobne informacije glede izračunov in jih po potrebi popravijo.
In the case of Andalucía, arithmetic mistakes with no impact on the final value of the aid amount have already been corrected. 
V primeru Andaluzije so bile matematične napake, ki ne vplivajo na končno vrednost zneska pomoči, že popravljene.
The Commission has requested the Managing Authority to clarify, provide additional justifications for, and even consider the adjustment of the aid amount for some issues identified by the Court, including the consideration of cost savings linked to a lower use of fertilisers in the calculation of the aid amount; the reply is still pending. 
Komisija je od organov za upravljanje zahtevala, da pojasnijo, zagotovijo dodatne utemeljitve in celo razmislijo o prilagoditvi zneska pomoči za nekatere vidike, na katere je opozorilo Sodišče, vključno z upoštevanjem prihrankov pri stroških, povezanih z manjšo uporabo gnojil, pri izračunu zneska pomoči; odgovor se še pričakuje.
The Commission services asked the Piemonte authorities to revise the calculation of aid amounts at several occasions end of 2010, and are awaiting submission of the revised calculation. 
Službe Komisije so konec leta 2010 od organov v Piemontu večkrat zahtevale, da popravijo izračun zneskov pomoči, in pričakujejo predložitev popravljenega izračuna.
According to the Polish authorities, the 2001–03 figures were used because the most recent data was not available, due to a change of the methodology. 
Po mnenju poljskih organov so bili podatki iz obdobja 2001–2003 uporabljeni zato, ker zaradi spremembe metodologije ni bilo na voljo najnovejših podatkov.
The Commission checked the level of the established baseline, the reasoning and methodology or the calculation of the reduction of nitrogen fertilisation against the information provided by an independent body (Institut national de la recherche agronomique [INRA], Avignon) which certified the accuracy of the baseline (see reply to Box 4 and the rural development programme for France, version 5, pp. 199–200). 
Komisija je preverila raven vzpostavljene osnovne ravni, obrazložitev in metodologijo ali izračun zmanjšanja gnojenja z dušikom glede na informacije, ki jih je predložil neodvisen organ (Institut national de la recherche agronomique [INRA], Avignon), ki je potrdil natančnost osnovne ravni (glej odgovor na okvir 4 in program podeželskega razvoja za Francijo, različica 5, str.
66 The Commission has taken note of the Court’s findings and will require the Member State to take the necessary measures to address the situation. 
66 Komisija je upoštevala ugotovitve Sodišča in bo od držav članic zahtevala, da sprejmejo ukrepe za ureditev razmer.
According to Art. 39(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the payments shall be granted annually and shall cover additional costs and income foregone resulting from the commitment made. 
V skladu s členom 39(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 se izplačila dodelijo letno za kritje dodatnih stroškov in izpad dobička, nastalih zaradi obveznosti.
If the basis for premium calculations changes after the original calculations have been made, premium adjustments are permitted and justified so as to allow minimising under-and overcompensation. 
Če se osnova za izračun premije po prvotnem izračunu spremeni, so prilagoditve premije dovoljene in utemeljene, da se lahko zmanjša število prenizkih ali prekomernih nadomestil.
Therefore, Member States have the possibility to adjust their agri-environment premiums. 
Zato imajo države članice možnost, da prilagodijo svoje kmetijsko-okoljske premije.
As regards the case mentioned by the Court, the annual progress report for rural development of 2008 (pp. 33–34) states that the measure in question had only a moderate success among potentially interested farmers due to a global market particularly favourable to arable crops, which made the aid less attractive. 
Glede zadeve, ki jo je navedlo Sodišče, letno poročilo o napredku za razvoj podeželja iz leta 2008 (str. 33–34) navaja, da je bil zadevni ukrep med kmeti, ki bi jih ta ukrep morda zanimal, samo zmerno uspešen zaradi svetovnega trga, ki je izredno ugoden za poljščine, zaradi česar je bila pomoč manj privlačna.
So, in 2008, the measure was not renewed for new commitment. 
Zato ukrep leta 2008 ni bil podaljšan.
However, the annual progress report for rural development of 2009 (p. 
Vendar letno poročilo o napredku za razvoj podeželja iz leta 2009 (str.
39) mentions that the measure was reopened in 2009 and 29 first-time applicants are committed. 
39) navaja, da je bil ukrep v letu 2009 ponovno uveden in zavezalo se je 29 prosilcev, ki so se prijavili prvič.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION In the modification of the French rural development programme (RDP), in May 2008, it was foreseen that the amounts of agri-environment premiums could be revised under the following conditions: the review of the calculation concerns all major elements of the premium calculation, the average figures of the two latest years are used, an account of the uptake of the measures in question should be provided, the Member State have to review the calculation elements every two years and notify the conclusions to the Commission. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE V spremembi francoskega programa razvoja podeželja maja 2008 je bilo predvideno, da se lahko zneski kmetijsko-okoljskih premij popravijo pod naslednjimi pogoji: pregled izračuna se nanaša na vse glavne elemente izračuna premije, uporabijo se povprečni podatki zadnjih dveh let, predloži se poročilo o uporabi zadevnega ukrepa, država članica elemente izračuna pregleda vsaki dve leti in ugotovitve priglasi Komisiji.
A review clause will be included both in all new contracts and in those ongoing contracts where the beneficiaries accept to benefit from the revised premiums. 
Klavzula o pregledu bo vključena v vse nove pogodbe in tiste tekoče pogodbe, v katerih se upravičenci strinjajo, da bodo koristili popravljene premije.
Art. 53 of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 stipulates that calculations are to be differentiated so as to take into account regional or local site conditions and actual land use ‘as appropriate’. 
Člen 53 Uredbe (ES) št. 1974/2006 navaja, da je treba izračune razlikovati tako, da upoštevajo regionalne ali lokalne krajevne razmere in dejansko rabo zemljišča, „kot je v posameznem primeru ustrezno“.
Member States are, however, requested to present in the calculations factors to differentiate the calculations’ figures (e.g. according to homogenous agricultural regions). 
Vendar se od držav članic zahteva, da v izračunu predstavijo dejavnike za diferenciacijo številk izračuna (npr. glede na homogene kmetijske regije).
The Commission agrees that in cases of significant differences between regions with regard to their characteristics (environmental, geographical, climatic) differentiation in aid amounts should be envisaged. 
Komisija se strinja, da bi moralo biti v primerih precejšnjih razlik med regijami glede njihovih značilnosti (okoljskih, geo-grafskih, podnebnih) predvideno razlikovanje v zneskih pomoči.
However, this would certainly carry with it additional administrative burden. 
Vendar bi to zagotovo povzročilo dodatno upravno breme.
Therefore, Member States must take account of a trade-off between the benefits and costs related to aid amount differentiation. Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
Zato morajo države članice upoštevati kompromis med koristmi in stroški, povezanimi z diferenciacijo zneska pomoči. Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
As regards the case referred to by the Court, the Commission will ask the Managing Authority of the programme to modify the measure ‘integrated production of olive trees’ in order to reflect the differences between irrigated and non-irrigated areas. 
Glede zadeve, ki jo je navedlo Sodišče, bo Komisija organ upravljanja programa zaprosila, da prilagodi ukrep „integrirana pridelava oljk“ tako, da bo odražal razlike med namakanimi in nenamakanimi območji.
This differentiation is already well taken into account in newly proposed agri-environment sub-measures for Andalucía, such as ‘Integrated production of sugar beet’. 
To razlikovanje je že upoštevano v novo predlaganih kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepih za Andaluzijo, kot je „integrirana pridelava sladkorne pese“.
See also the reply to point 63. 
Glej tudi odgovor na točko 63.
65–66. France opted for using a unique aid amount based on the reference price of the fodder unit for the mountainous zones but also the lowest level of production in the different regions (data INRA, Avignon) namely 6tn DM. 
Francija se je odločila za uporabo enkratnega zneska pomoči na podlagi referenčne cene krme za gorska območja, pa tudi na podlagi najnižje stopnje proizvodnje v različnih regijah (podatki INRA, Avignon), namreč 6 ton suhe snovi.
This choice was based on the fact that the majority of the committed surfaces are located in mountainous zones (Massif Central, Alps, Pyrenees, Jura) (mid-term evaluation (MTE), p. 
Ta izbira je temeljila na dejstvu, da se večina zave-zanih površin nahaja na gorskih območjih (Centralni masiv, Alpe, Pireneji, Jura) (vme-sno ocenjevalno poročilo, str.
Moreover, France also made this choice in order to increase the readability of the measure. 
Poleg tega se je Francija odločila tudi, da bo povečala zanesljivost ukrepa.
As regards the Polish case, the Commission services discussed this issue with the respective authorities who decided that it was not feasible to introduce differentiation in aid amounts due to the substantial extra costs involved. 
Glede poljske zadeve so službe Komisije o tem vprašanju razpravljale z zadevnimi organi, ki so se odločili, da uvedba diferenciacije zneskov pomoči zaradi precejšnjih dodatnih stroškov ni izvedljiva.
Therefore, while calculating the aid amounts for several sub-measures where the commitment covers both arable land and permanent pastures but the payment is only limited to arable land, an average Standard Gross Margin (SGM) was used. 
Zato je bilo pri izračunu zneskov pomoči za več ukrepov, pri katerih zaveza obsega tako njive kot trajne pašnike, vendar je plačilo omejeno samo na njive, uporabljeno povprečno standardizirano pokritje (SGM).
Polish authorities also pointed to difficulties in setting the borders of eligible areas benefiting from different aid amounts. 
Poljski organi so izpostavili tudi težave pri določanju mej upravičenih območij, ki koristijo različne zneske pomoči.
See also the reply to point 79 on the negative experiences of the 2004–06 programming period. 
Glej tudi odgovor na točko 79 o negativnih izkušnjah iz programskega obdobja 2004–2006.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 67. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 67.
Aid levels cannot be fixed so as to achieve a certain participation target. 
Stopenj pomoči ni mogoče določiti tako, da bi bilo doseženo določeno ciljno sodelovanje.
Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 stipulates that, as regards payment levels per hectare, agri-environment payments must be based on costs incurred and income foregone and do not allow for incentive elements. 
Člen 39 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 navaja, da morajo kmetijsko-okoljska plačila glede stopenj plačil na hektar temeljiti na nastalih stroških in izpadu dohodka ter ne omogočajo elementov spodbude.
Those amounts are established by applying a standard cost approach, which is in line with the need to respect the proportionality of administrative efforts. 
Ti zneski so določeni z uporabo standardnega stroškovnega pristopa, ki je v skladu s potrebo po spoštovanju sorazmernosti upravnih prizadevanj.
Agri-environment as a whole is expected to contribute, together with other measures, to the general environmental objectives set at programme level. 
Od kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov kot celote se pričakuje, da bodo skupaj z drugimi ukrepi prispevali k splošnim okoljskim ciljem, določenim na ravni programa.
Basic sub-measures are part of agri-environment. 
Osnovni podukrepi so del kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
The effectiveness of agri-environment is assessed at measure and axis level. 
Učinkovitost kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov se ocenjuje na ravni ukrepa in osi.
2008 was the first year of the implementation of agri-environment in the framework of the programming period 2007–13 in Poland, in which only the three simplest variants were in place. 
Leto 2008 je bilo prvo leto izvajanja kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov v okviru programskega obdobja 2007–2013 na Poljskem, vzpostavljene pa so bile samo tri najpre-prostejše različice.
That year does not reflect the actual territorial coverage of the agri-environment measure. 
To leto ne odraža dejanske ozemeljske pokritosti kmetijsko-okoljskega ukrepa.
The aid amounts are below the calculated ceiling of additional costs/income foregone as Polish authorities want to cover the maximum number of interested beneficiaries thus achieving the largest environmental impact. 
Zneski pomoči so pod izračunano zgornjo mejo dodatnih stroškov/izpada dobička, ker želijo poljski organi zajeti največje možno število zainteresiranih upravičencev in tako doseči največji vpliv na okolje.
Regarding the Swedish case mentioned by the Court, it is true that the aid rate for the sub-measure Riparian Strips was increased from 1 000 SEK/ha to 3 000 SEK/ha in the 6th modification of the Swedish rural development programme (RDP). 
Kar zadeva švedski primer, ki ga je navedlo Sodišče, drži, da je bila stopnja pomoči za podukrep za obrežne pasove v šesti spremembi švedskega programa razvoja podeželja zvišana s 1 000 SEK/ha na 3 000 SEK/ha.
In the 2000–06 period the aid rate had been set to 2 700 SEK/ha and the risk was high that the decreased rate would prevent farmers from continuing with this sub-measure. 
V obdobju 2000–2006 je bila stopnja pomoči določena na 2 700 SEK/ha in obstajalo je veliko tveganje, da bi znižana stopnja kmete odvrnila od tega, da nadaljujejo izvajanje tega podukrepa.