natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5 ABBREVIATIONS CAP: Common agricultural policy CATS: Clearance Audit Trail System (database collecting information related to European agricultural funds payments) CNDP: Complementary National Direct Payments EAGF: European Agricultural Guarantee Fund Eurostat: Statistical Office of the European Union GAC: Good Agricultural Condition GAEC: Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition IACS: Integrated Administration and Control System LFA: Less favoured area LPIS: Land Parcel Identification System SMR: Statutory Management Requirements SAPS: Single Area Payment Scheme SPS: Single Payment Scheme UAA: Utilised Agricultural Area WTO: World Trade Organisation Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah 5 KRATICE CATS: Clearance Audit Trail System (podatkovna zbirka, ki vsebuje informacije v zvezi s plačili iz evropskih kmetijskih skladov) EKJS: Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad Eurostat: Statistični urad Evropske unije GAC: dobro kmetijsko stanje GAEC: dobri kmetijski in okoljski pogoji IAKS: integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem KZU: kmetijsko zemljišče v uporabi LPIS: identifikacijski sistem za zemljišča SEP: shema enotnega plačila SEPP: shema enotnega plačila na površino SKP: skupna kmetijska politika Posebno poročilo št.
Agenda 2000: This reform put the CAP on two main pillars which the Community budget finances through two European Agricultural funds. 
6 GLOSAR Agenda 2000: Ta reforma je uvedla strukturo SKP v obliki dveh glavnih stebrov, ki se financirata iz proračuna Skupnosti prek dveh evropskih kmetijskih skladov.
The first pillar (European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF)) provides for market measures and income support in the form of direct payments. 
Prvi steber (Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS)) zagotavlja tržne ukrepe in dohodkovno podporo v obliki neposrednih plačil.
The second pillar (European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)) co-finances rural development measures in areas such as agri-environment, the promotion of food quality, higher technical standards and animal welfare. 
Drugi steber (Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP)) sofinancira ukrepe za razvoj podeželja na področjih, kot so kmetijsko okolje, spodbujanje kakovosti hrane, višji tehnični standardi in dobro počutje živali.
Agricultural factor income: Indicates the net value added of agricultural activities (as well as inseparable non-agricultural, secondary activities) at factor cost. 
Faktorski dohodek kmetijstva: Ta kaže čisto dodano vrednost kmetijskih dejavnosti (ter neločljivih nekmetij-skih, sekundarnih dejavnosti) po faktorskih stroških.
It is calculated by subtracting the value of intermediate consumption, the consumption of fixed capital and production taxes from the value of agricultural output at basic prices and adding the value of (other) subsidies on production. 
Izračuna se tako, da se od vrednosti kmetijske proizvodnje po osnovnih cenah odštejejo vrednost vmesne potrošnje, poraba fiksnega kapitala in davki na proizvodnjo, prišteje pa se vrednost (drugih) subvencij za proizvodnjo.
Households often receive income from other sources (non-agricultural activities, salaries, social benefits, income from property) so that agricultural income is not necessarily identical with the actual income of agricultural households. 
Gospodinjstva pogosto prejemajo dohodke iz drugih virov (nekmetijske dejavnosti, plače, socialni prejemki, dohodek od lastnine), zato kmetijski dohodek ni nujno enak dejanskemu dohodku kmetijskih gospodinjstev.
Decoupling: Process of separation of direct aid payments from agricultural production. 
Ločevanje pomoči od proizvodnje: Proces ločevanja plačil neposredne pomoči od kmetijske proizvodnje.
New Member States: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia. 
Nove države članice: Bolgarija, Češka, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Madžarska, Malta, Poljska, Romunija, Slovenija in Slovaška.
2003 reform: CAP reform (‘Mid-Term Review’) which aimed to reduce price support and compensate for this reduction by direct income aid continuing a process that had begun in 1992 (MacSharry reform), and confirmed in 1999 (Agenda 2000 reform). 
Reforma iz leta 2003: Reforma SKP („vmesni pregled“), namenjena zmanjšanju cenovne podpore in kom-penzaciji tega zmanjšanja z neposredno dohodkovno podporo, s katero se je nadaljeval proces iz leta 1992 („MacSharryjeva reforma“), ki je bil potrjen leta 1999 (z reformo Agenda 2000).
The 2003 reform introduced the decoupling of aid and cross-compliance while reinforcing rural development assistance. 
Z reformo iz leta 2003 sta bili uvedeni proizvodno nevezana pomoč in navzkrižna skladnost, hkrati pa se je povečala pomoč za razvoj podeželja.
7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The Single Area Payment Scheme (SAPS) is a simplified income support scheme directed at farmers in the new Member States. 
SEPP: Prehodna poenostavljena shema dohodkovne podpore za kmete v novih državah članicah.
In its report on the SPS1 the Court noted the inadequacy of the definition of ‘farmers’ and the payment of aid to beneficiaries not or only marginally involved in farming. 
Sodišče je v svojem poročilu o SEP1 opozorilo na neustreznost opredelitve „kmeta“ in na izplačevanje pomoči upravičencem, ki se ne ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom, ali pa se z njim ukvarjajo le kot z obrobno dejavnostjo.
The current audit allows the same conclusions to be drawn with respect to SAPS. 
Pri tej reviziji je prišlo do enakih zaključkov o SEPP.
In addition, in some of the Member States concerned, SAPS aid was also legally paid to (and supporting the income of) public entities managing state land and not otherwise involved in farming. 
Poleg tega je bila pomoč iz SEPP v nekaterih zadevnih državah članicah zakonito izplačana javnim subjektom, ki upravljajo državna zemljišča in se sicer ne ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom (kar pomeni, da je bila zanje dohodkovna podpora).
V. Member States did not precisely identify eligible areas and payments were made in relation to unutilised parcels or land devoted to non-agricultural activities. 
V. Države članice niso natančno opredelile upravičenih površin, zato so bila izvršena plačila za zemljišča, ki niso v uporabi, ali pa so namenjena nekmetijskim dejavnostim.
This situation has an impact on the amount paid to each individual farmer and weakens the link between the payment and the eligible area. 
To stanje vpliva na znesek, izplačan vsakemu posameznemu kmetu, in slabi povezavo med plačili in upravičenimi površinami.
SAPS payments have significantly contributed to increase farmers’ income in the Member States concerned and they are currently the main source of net income for many farmers. 
Plačila iz SEPP so pomembno prispevala k povišanju dohodkov kmetov v zadevnih državah članicah in so zdaj za številne med njimi glavni vir čistih dohodkov.
However, in terms of its distribution SAPS aid is essentially based on the area of agricultural parcels at the disposal of farmers without taking into consideration neither the specific regional characteristics of farming activity, nor the contribution of farmers to the production of public goods. 
Vendar razdeljevanje pomoči iz SEPP v bistvu temelji na površini kmetijskih parcel, ki jih imajo kmetje na voljo, brez upoštevanja specifičnih regionalnih značilnosti kmetijskih dejavnosti ali prispevka kmetov k proizvodnji javnih dobrin.
In addition, the dual structure of the agricultural sector in many of the new Member States (ranging from large farms on the one hand to a large number of small family holdings on the other hand) together with the surface-based nature of the scheme results in a strong concentration of the payments to a small number of large beneficiaries while the majority of farmers receive very small amounts of aid. 
Poleg tega dvodelna struktura kmetijskega sektorja v mnogih novih državah članicah (z velikimi kmetijami na eni strani in številnimi majhnimi družinskimi gospodarstvi na drugi) in dejstvo, da shema temelji na površini, povzročata veliko osredotočanje plačil na majhno število velikih upravičencev, medtem ko večina kmetov prejema zelo majhne zneske pomoči. 1 Posebno poročilo št.
1 Special Report No 5/2011 on Single Payment Scheme (SPS): Issues to be addressed to improve its sound financial management (http.//eca. europa.eu). 
5/2011 – Shema enotnega plačila (SEP): vprašanja, ki jih je treba obravnavati za izboljšanje njenega dobrega finančnega poslovodenja (http://eca.europa.eu).
There is no option to differentiate SAPS payments within a Member State to take into account the agricultural potential of regions or environmental criteria. 
Plačil iz SEPP v državah članicah ni mogoče diferen-cirati, tako da bi se upoštevale kmetijske možnosti regij ali okoljska merila.
Since 2010, however, Member States may use a part of the national SAPS envelope for specific aid to farmers in economically vulnerable or environmentally sensitive areas, or for economically vulnerable types of farming. 
Vendar lahko države članice – od leta 2010 del nacionalnega finančnega okvira za SEPP uporabijo za posebno pomoč kmetom na gospodarsko ranljivih ali okoljsko občutljivih območjih ali za gospodarsko ranljive vrste kmetijstva.
However, it is too early to assess the impact of this option on the distribution of SAPS aid. VIII. The level of direct payments in the Member States was established with a view to encouraging the necessary restructuring of the agricultural sector and to avoiding the creation of considerable income disparities and social distortions in the rural societies affected. 
Vendar je za oceno učinka te možnosti na razdeljevanje pomoči iz SEPP še prezgodaj. – moči in se omeji na parcele, na katerih je treba VIII. zaradi standardov GAEC dejansko izvajati redne Raven neposrednih plačil v državah članicah je bila določena za spodbujanje potrebnega prestrukturiranja kmetijskega sektorja ter preprečevanje večjih razlik v dohodkih in socialnih izkrivljanj v zadevnih podeželskih skupnostih.
However, persisting structural weaknesses in the agricultural economy of SAPS Member States may impact the long-term effectiveness and efficiency of the direct payments. 
Vendar lahko stalne strukturne sla-– bosti v kmetijstvu v državah članicah, ki uporabljajo SEPP, vplivajo na dolgoročno uspešnost in učinkovitost neposrednih plačil.
To date the Commission has not analysed the effects of SAPS aid on the restructuring of the farming sector. IX. 
Komisija doslej ni analizirala učinkov pomoči iz SEPP na prestrukturiranje kmetijskega sektorja. – kmetijske dejavnosti.
The effectiveness of SAPS in supporting farm income is diminished where the aid is ‘capitalised’ in land or land lease prices. 
Na podlagi take Uspešnost SEPP pri dohodkovni podpori kmetijam je zmanjšana, kadar je pomoč „kapitalizirana“ v cenah ali zakupninah zemljišč.
The Commission has not yet analysed these effects in the Member States visited but there is evidence that SAPS payments are correlated with an increase in land and land lease prices. 
Komisija še ni analizirala teh učinkov v obiskanih državah članicah, vendar obstajajo dokazi, da so plačila iz SEPP povezana z višanjem cen – in zakupnin zemljišč.
X. Most Member States applying the SAPS have not prepared for the introduction of an entitlement-based scheme that will succeed the SAPS. 
X. Večina držav članic, ki uporabljajo SEPP, še ni pripravljenih na uvedbo sheme na podlagi pravic, ki bo nasledila SEPP.
On the basis of such an analysis, the Commission should consider complementary measures aimed at restructuring the farm sector and making it more competitive. — The Commission should actively support the Member States and more closely monitor their preparations for the introduction of a future entitlement-based scheme. 
Pri uvedbi SEP v državah članicah EU-15 leta 2005 se je pokazalo, da je zaradi izvajanja take sheme prišlo do pomembnih zamud pri plačilih kmetom. analize naj razmisli o dopolnilnih ukrepih za prestrukturiranje kmetijskega sektorja in povečanje njegove konkurenčnosti; naj Komisija dejavno podpira države članice in natančneje spremlja njihove priprave na uvedbo prihodnje sheme, ki bo temeljila na pravicah.
In particular, it should assist Member States in identifying key requirements for national administrations and farmers. 
Predvsem naj državam članicam pomaga opredeliti ključne zahteve za nacionalne uprave in kmete.
When the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia joined the European Union (EU) on 1 May 2004, the core of the common agricultural policy (CAP) consisted of coupled direct payments to farmers based on areas of arable land and numbers of animals (bovine, ovine and caprine). 
Ko so se Češka, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Madžarska, Malta, Poljska, Slovenija in Slovaška 1. maja 2004 pridružili Evropski uniji (EU), so bila jedro skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) vezana neposredna plačila kmetom na podlagi površine njiv in števila živali (govedo, ovce in koze).
In 2002, the Council had decided that such direct payments would be available to farmers in the new Member States. 
Svet se je leta 2002 odločil, da bodo taka neposredna plačila na voljo kmetom v novih državah članicah.
In accordance with the principles in force at that time in the EU Member States (EU-15), the Council established for each new Member State a budgetary ceiling. 
V skladu z načeli, ki so takrat veljala v državah članica EU (EU-15), je Svet za vsako novo državo članico določil proračunsko zgornjo mejo.
This is the maximum amount financed from the EU budget that could be spent annually on direct payments. 
To je najvišji znesek, ki se financira iz proračuna EU in se lahko letno porabi za neposredna plačila.
The Council also decided that direct payments would be progressively increased until 2013 to be comparable to the support level granted in the EU-15. 
Svet se je odločil tudi, da se bodo neposredna plačila do leta 2013 postopoma višala, da bodo primerljiva z ravnijo podpore, odobreno v EU-15.
However, the structure of the agricultural sector in most of the new Member States was substantially different from that which prevailed in EU-15 Member States. 
Vendar se je struktura kmetijskih sektorjev v večini novih držav članic precej razlikovala od strukture, ki je prevladovala v državah članicah EU-15.
It was characterised by a dual structure with large farms on the one hand and a large number of small family holdings on the other hand. 
Struktura je bila dvodelna, z velikimi kmetijami na eni strani in številnimi majhnimi družinskimi gospodarstvi na drugi.
Overall, the productivity of the sector was low. 
Produktivnost sektorja je bila na splošno nizka.
In addition, most national administrations had no experience of the management of a system of direct payments to farmers. 
Poleg tega večina nacionalnih uprav ni imela izkušenj z upravljanjem sistema neposrednih plačil kmetom.
For this reason, the Act of Accession signed with the Member States that joined the EU in 2004 offered them, as an alternative to coupled direct payments, the option to implement, during a transition period, a simplified income support system: the ‘Single Area Payment Scheme’ (SAPS). 
Zato so države članice, ki so se pridružile EU leta 2004, v aktu o pristopu, ki so ga podpisale, dobile možnost, da namesto vezanih neposrednih plačil v prehodnem obdobju izvajajo poenostavljen sistem dohodkovne podpore: shemo enotnega plačila na površino (SEPP).
This Act provides that, for each new Member State, the Commission shall fix an annual financial envelope for SAPS expenditure within the national budgetary ceiling established by the Council. 
V tem aktu je bilo navedeno, da bo Komisija za vsako novo državo članico določila letni finančni okvir za odhodke iz SEPP v okviru nacionalne proračunske zgornje meje, ki jo je določil Svet.
The same option was also offered to Bulgaria and Romania when they joined the EU in 2007. 
Ista možnost je bila ponujena Bolgariji in Romuniji, ko sta se leta 2007 pridružili EU.
In parallel with the process of enlargement of the EU, the Council adopted the 2003 reform of the CAP. This reform: (a) introduced a Single Payment Scheme (SPS) replacing most existing direct payments whereby aid was ‘decoupled’ from any obligation to produce; (b) made disbursement of the full amount of direct payments conditional on the respect of ‘cross compliance’ obligations by farmers2; and (c) established a compulsory mechanism to reduce all direct payments exceeding 5 000 euro per calendar year and per farm by a fixed percentage (‘modulation’). 
Svet je leta 2003 vzporedno s procesom širitve EU sprejel še reformo SKP, s katero: (a) je bila uvedena shema enotnega plačila (SEP), ki je nadomestila večino obstoječih neposrednih plačil in s katero je bila pomoč ločena od vsakršne obveznosti proizvodnje; (b) je bil uveden pogoj, da morajo kmetje za prejetje celotnega zneska neposrednih plačil upoštevati zahteve „navzkrižne skladnosti“2 in (c) je bil vzpostavljen obvezni mehanizem za zmanjšanje vseh neposrednih plačil, ki presegajo 5 000 EUR na kmetijo v koledarskem letu, za določen odstotek („modulacija“).
The Council decided in 2004 that the principles adopted in the 2003 reform would be applicable in the new Member States, with the exception of the ‘modulation’ element (at least until the level of direct payments applicable in the new Member States equalled that applicable in the EU-15). 
Svet se je leta 2004 odločil, da bodo v novih državah članicah veljala načela, sprejeta z reformo leta 2003, razen elementa „modulacije“ (vsaj dokler raven neposrednih plačil, ki se uporablja v novih državah članicah, ne bo enaka tisti, ki se uporablja v EU-15).
However, the option of implementing the SAPS was maintained3. 6. 
Vendar je bila ohranjena možnost izvajanja SEPP.3 6.
In 2004, only Malta and Slovenia elected to implement the direct payments provisions in force at the time and, subsequently, in 2007, the SPS which had come into force in the EU-15 since 2005. 
Leta 2004 sta se samo Malta in Slovenija odločili za izvajanje takrat veljavnih določb o neposrednih plačilih, leta 2007 pa še za izvajanje SEP, ki je v EU-15 začela veljati leta 2005.
The Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and, in 2007, Bulgaria and Romania decided to implement the SAPS. 
Češka, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Madžarska, Poljska in Slovaška, leta 2007 pa tudi Bolgarija in Romunija, so se odločili izvajati SEPP.
From the start, the SAPS was thus conceived as a transition towards the direct payment system in force in the EU as a whole (SPS as from 2005). 
SEPP je bila tako že od začetka zasnovana kot prehod na sistem neposrednih plačil, ki velja v celotni EU (od leta 2005 SEP).
However, within the framework of the ‘Health Check’ of the CAP in 2008, the Council extended this period until the end of 2013. 
Sprva je bilo načrtovano, da se bo prehodno obdobje končalo najkasneje leta 2009, vendar ga je Svet v okviru „pregleda stanja SKP“ leta 2008 podaljšal do leta 2013.
Therefore, the direct payment system currently under discussion in the European Parliament and the Council that will be adopted as part of the new CAP to be implemented as of 2014 will replace the SAPS as of this date4. 2 This means that payments to farmers are conditional on respecting basic standards for the environment, food safety, animal health and welfare on their farms known as statutory management requirements (SMR) and maintaining their land in good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC). 
Zato bo sistem neposrednih plačil, o katerem se sedaj razpravlja v Evropskem parlamentu in Svetu in ki bo sprejet kot del nove SKP, ki se bo izvajala od leta 2014, takrat nadomestil SEPP.4 2 To pomeni, da morajo kmetje na svojih kmetijah kot pogoj za plačila upoštevati osnovne standarde v zvezi z okoljem, varnostjo živil ter zdravjem in dobrim počutjem živali, t. i. predpisane zahteve ravnanja, in svoja zemljišča ohranjati v dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih (GAEC).
3 Council Decision 2004/281/EC of 22 March 2004 adapting the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, following the reform of the common agricultural policy (OJ L 93, 30.3.2004, p. 1). 
3 Sklep Sveta (2004/281/ES) z dne 22. marca 2004 o prilagoditvi Akta o pogojih pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in prilagoditvah pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija, zaradi reforme skupne kmetijske politike (UL L 93, 30.3.2004. str. 1).
4 COM(2011) 625 final/2 of 19 October 2011: Proposal for a regulation stablishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy. 10 Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
4 COM(2011) 625 final/2 z dne 19. oktobra 2011: Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi pravil za neposredna plačila kmetom v podpornih shemah v okviru skupne kmetijske politike. 10 Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
KEY ELEMENTS OF SAPS 8. 
KLJUČNI ELEMENTI SHEME ENOTNEGA PLAČILA NA POVRŠINO 8.
SAPS is a simplified income support scheme directed at farmers and based on the area of eligible land at their disposal5. In each Member State, the aid consists of an annual amount per hectare of eligible land. 
SEPP je poenostavljena shema dohodkovne podpore za kmete, ki temelji na površini upravičenih zemljišč, ki jih imajo na voljo.5 V vsaki državi članici pomeni pomoč letni znesek na hektar upravičenega zemljišča.
Farmers submit to the competent national authority an annual declaration comprising all agricultural parcels. 
Kmetje pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu predložijo letno prijavo, v kateri navedejo vse kmetijske parcele.
Farmers have no obligation to produce or to employ factors of production, but they must maintain the parcels in good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC)6. 9. 
Kmetje nimajo obveznosti proizvodnje ali uporabe proizvodnih dejavnikov, vendar morajo parcele ohranjati v dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih (GAEC).6 9.
In each Member State the level of the annual payment per hectare is calculated by dividing the annual financial envelope by the agricultural area of each new Member State. 
Raven letnega plačila na hektar se v vsaki državi članici izračuna z deljenjem letnega finančnega okvira s kmetijsko površino vsake nove države članice.
Where in a given year these payments exceed the annual financial envelope, the national amount per hectare applicable is reduced proportionately by applying a reduction coefficient. 
Če v posameznem letu ta plačila presežejo letni finančni okvir, se nacionalni znesek na hektar, ki se uporablja v tej državi, sorazmerno zniža z uporabo redukcijskega koeficienta.
This ensures that payments do not exceed the national envelopes adopted in the Acts of Accession. 
S tem se zagotovi, da plačila ne presežejo nacionalnih finančnih okvirov, sprejetih v aktu o pristopu.