natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
31 Article 8(1) and Annex I of Commission Decision 2010/670/EU. 
26 31 Člen 8(1) in Priloga I Sklepa Sveta 2010/670/EU.
32 At the launch of NER300 in 2010, these included wind energy, ocean energy, bioenergy, photovoltaics, concentrated solar power, hydropower, geothermal energy and smart grids. 
32 Na začetku izvajanja programa NER300 leta 2010 so v to skupino spadali vetrna energija, morska energija, bioenergija, fotovoltaika, koncentrirana sončna energija, vodna energija, geotermalna energija in pametna omrežja.
33 Award Decision C(2012) 9432 final of 18 December 2012 awarded grants to 20 renewable energy projects and Award Decision C(2014) 4493 final of 8 July 2014 awarded grants to 18 renewable energy and 1 CCS projects. 
33 S sklepom o dodelitvi sredstev C(2012) 9432 final z dne 18. decembra 2012 so bila dodeljena nepovratna sredstva 20 projektom na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov, s sklepom o dodelitvi sredstev C(2014) 4493 final z dne 8. julija 2014 pa 18 projektom na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov in enemu projektu CCS.
Under the original NER300 legislation, projects would have to reach final investment decision within two years (i.e. in 2014 and 2016) and enter into operation no later than four years (i.e. in 2016 and 2018) after the award decisions. In February 2015, the Commission amended the NER300 Decision, putting back the deadlines for final investment decision and entry into operation by two years34. 
Slika 7 – Pregled stanja projektov na področju inovativne energije iz obnovljivih virov v okviru programa NER300 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi analize podatkov NER300 V skladu s prvotnimi pravili programa NER300 bi bilo treba končno naložbeno odločitev za projekte sprejeti v dveh letih (tj. v letih 2014 in 2016), projekti pa bi morali začeti delovati najpozneje v štirih letih (tj. v letih 2016 in 2018) po sklepu o dodelitvi sredstev.
The amending Decision mentioned that the economic crisis was the main reason why a significant number of projects awarded NER300 funds were unable to reach final investment decision within the original deadlines. Despite these deadline extensions, seven projects (with total grants awarded exceeding half a billion euro) had withdrawn from NER300 by early 2018. 
Komisija je februarja 2015 spremenila sklep o programu NER300 ter za dve leti podaljšala roke za končno naložbeno odločitev in začetek delovanja.34 V spremembi sklepa je bilo navedeno, da je bila gospodarska kriza glavni razlog za to, da za številne projekte, za katere so bila dodeljena sredstva v okviru programa NER300, ni bilo mogoče sprejeti končne naložbene odločitve v prvotnih rokih.
One further project was likely to withdraw in 2018, representing another 34 Commission Decision (EU) 2015/191 of 5 February 2015 amending Decision 2010/670/EU as regards the extension of certain time limits laid down in Article 9 and Article 11(1) of that Decision (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 
Kljub podaljšanju rokov je bilo iz programa NER300 do začetka leta 2018 umaknjenih sedem projektov (za katere je bilo skupaj dodeljenih več kot 34 Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/191 z dne 5. februarja 2015 o spremembi Sklepa 2010/670/EU glede podaljšanja nekaterih rokov, določenih v členu 9 in členu 11(1) Sklepa (UL L 31, 7.2.2015, str.
31 million euro. Fourteen projects awarded grants in 2014 should still reach final investment decision in 2018. 
Za štirinajst projektov, za katere so bila leta 2014 dodeljena nepovratna sredstva, naj bi bila v letu 2018 sprejeta končna naložbena odločitev.
A project should meet 75 % of the expected amount of energy produced within five years of operation to obtain 100 % of the grant. 
Za pridobitev 100 % nepovratnih sredstev bi moral projekt doseči proizvodno 75 % pričakovane količine energije v petih letih delovanja.
At the end of 2017, three operational renewables projects had received annual disbursements based on their energy output. 
Ob koncu leta 2017 so trije operativni projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov prejeli letna izplačila na podlagi količine proizvedene energije.
These were thus not on track to meet the required 75 % output threshold for claiming their full grants. 
Zato nista bila na dobri poti za doseganje 75-odstotnega praga proizvodnje, da bi lahko zahtevala celotni znesek nepovratnih sredstev.
The wind energy project receiving disbursements since 2014 was on track. 
Projekt na področju vetrne energije, ki prejema izplačila od leta 2014, se je izvajal v skladu z načrti.
Due to project withdrawals, delays and lower than expected project outputs, NER300 is not on track to achieve the intended impact across a broad range of renewable energy technologies and enable their first commercial demonstration. 
Zaradi umikov projektov, zamud in slabših rezultatov projektov, kot so bili pričakovani, program NER300 zaostaja pri doseganju načrtovanega učinka na vrsto tehnologij za energijo iz obnovljivih virov in omogočanju njihove prve komercialne demonstracije.
EEPR and NER300 projects were affected by adverse investment conditions Low carbon energy demonstration projects carry high technological and financial risk and thus face many challenges on their way to reaching market deployment. 
Na projekte v okviru programov EEPO in NER300 so vplivali neugodni naložbeni pogoji Demonstracijski projekti na področju nizkoogljične energije pomenijo visoko tehnološko in finančno tveganje, zato se pri uvajanju na trg srečujejo s številnimi izzivi.
Wider economic and regulatory issues affect their access to finance. 
Na njihov dostop do financiranja vplivajo širša gospodarska in regulativna vprašanja.
In this section, we explore how such factors have affected the performance of EEPR and NER300. 
V tem delu poročila je Sodišče preučilo, kako so taki dejavniki vplivali na smotrnost programov EEPO in NER300.
We surveyed the Energy Technology Innovation Platforms associated to the SET-plan architecture and two other organisations (see paragraph 18) to determine the main barriers to finding finance for commercial demonstration projects in the EU. 
Izvedlo je anketo v tehnoloških in inovacijskih platformah, ki so povezane s strukturo načrta SET, in v dveh drugih organizacijah (glej odstavek 18), da bi ugotovilo glavne ovire pri iskanju financiranja za komercialne demonstracijske projekte v EU.
The results presented in Figure 8 show consensus among the stakeholders consulted regarding the relevance of a number of key barriers. 26 
Rezultati, predstavljeni na sliki 8, kažejo, da med deležniki, s katerimi so bila opravljena posvetovanja, obstaja soglasje glede pomembnosti številnih ključnih ovir. 28
Figure 8 – Survey results on barriers for financing demonstration projects Source: ECA. When programmes like EEPR and NER300 were conceived in 2008, oil, coal, gas and wholesale electricity prices were at very high historical levels. 
Slika 8 – Rezultati ankete o ovirah za financiranje demonstracijskih projektov Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče Ko so bili leta 2008 zasnovani programi, kot sta EEPO in NER300, so bile cene nafte, premoga in plina ter veleprodajne cene električne energije na zelo visoki ravni v primerjavi s cenami v preteklosti.
They all sharply decreased going into 2009, just before the launch of the programmes. 
Nato so se na prehodu v leto 2009, tik pred začetkom izvajanja programov, močno znižale.
While oil prices recovered until another drop in 2014, these factors are important drivers for investment in low carbon technologies. 
Čeprav so se cene nafte spet zvišale do naslednjega upada leta 2014, so ti dejavniki pomembna spodbuda za naložbe v nizkoogljične tehnologije.
The drop and volatility in prices of fossil fuels made the investments in new low carbon energy technologies less attractive compared to the fossil fuel energy sources. 
Zaradi znižanja in nihanja cen fosilnih goriv so postale naložbe v nove nizkoogljične energetske tehnologije manj privlačne v primerjavi s fosilnimi viri energije.
The next paragraphs describe how other key barriers affect the financing conditions of NER300 and EEPR projects (Annex III links these barriers to the performance figures of these programmes). 
V naslednjih odstavkih je opisano, kako druge ključne ovire vplivajo na pogoje financiranja projektov v okviru programov NER300 in EEPO (v Prilogi III so te ovire povezane s kazalniki smotrnosti teh programov).
27 Which factors keep low carbon energy demonstration projects from reaching final investment decision? 
29 Kateri dejavniki preprečujejo sprejetje končne naložbene odločitve za demonstracijske projekte na področju nizkoogljične energije?
The investment climate for demonstration projects was affected by uncertainty in regulatory frameworks and policies In view of the challenge of financing high-risk demonstration projects, the ETS Directive and NER300 Decision had raised the expectations of potential projects that Member States would contribute national public funding to those projects selected under NER300. 
Na naložbeno okolje za demonstracijske projekte je vplivala negotovost v regulativnih okvirih in politikah Ob upoštevanju izziva, povezanega s financiranjem zelo tveganih demonstracijskih projektov, so bila v direktivi o ETS in sklepu o programu NER300 izražena pričakovanja potencialnih projektov, da bodo države članice prispevale nacionalna javna sredstva za projekte, izbrane v okviru programa NER300.
The Commission asked Member States to confirm this for the projects selected before granting NER300 funds to them. 
Komisija je prosila države članice, naj to potrdijo za izbrane projekte, preden jim dodeli sredstva iz programa NER300.
Member State support could consist of capital grants towards the development and construction of infrastructure. 
Podpora držav članic bi lahko vključevala nepovratna kapitalska sredstva za razvoj in izgradnjo infrastrukture.
It could also include additional benefits such as feed-in tariffs (see Box 4) or premiums to support the operation of the newly built installations. 
Poleg tega bi lahko vključevala dodatne koristi, kot so zagotovljene odkupne cene (glej okvir 4) ali premije za podpiranje delovanja novozgrajenih obratov.
NER300 rules also allowed Member States to issue a guarantee to let the EIB release part of the awarded funds to projects before they became operational. 
Pravila programa NER300 so državam članicam tudi omogočala, da izdajo jamstvo, na podlagi katerega je lahko EIB del dodeljenih sredstev za projekte sprostila še pred začetkom njihovega delovanja.
We found at the time of our audit that only four projects in four Member States had actually benefited from such a guarantee and received upfront payments from the EIB. 
Med revizijo je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so samo štirje projekti v štirih državah članicah dejansko izkoristili tako jamstvo in prejeli vnaprejšnja plačila od EIB.
28 Box 4 – Feed-in-tariffs and premiums for renewable energy A feed-in-tariff is a support scheme under which fixed electricity prices are paid to renewable energy producers for each unit of energy produced and injected into the electricity grid. 
30 Okvir 4 – Zagotovljene odkupne cene in odkupne premije za energijo iz obnovljivih virov Zagotovljene odkupne cene so program podpore, v okviru katerega se proizvajalcem energije iz obnovljivih virov plačujejo nespremenljive cene električne energije za vsako proizvedeno enoto energije, dovedeno v omrežje električne energije.
The payment of the tariff is guaranteed for a certain period of time that is often related to the economic lifetime of the respective renewable energy project (usually between 10-25 years). 
Plačilo zagotovljene odkupne cene je zagotovljeno za neko obdobje, ki je pogosto povezano z ekonomsko življenjsko dobo posameznega projekta na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov (običajno 10–25 let).
A feed-in-premium is a support scheme under which electricity from renewable energy sources is typically sold on the electricity market and producers receive a premium on top of the market price of their electricity production. 
Odkupne premije so program podpore, v okviru katerega se električna energija iz obnovljivih virov običajno prodaja na trgu električne energije, proizvajalci pa prejmejo premijo, ki je dodatek k tržni ceni njihove proizvedene električne energije.
The premium can either be fixed (i.e. at a constant level independent of market prices) or sliding (i.e. with variable levels depending on the evolution of market prices)35. In 2012, before the first award decision, the EIB had informed the Commission that the viability of the submitted financing plans strongly depended on support Member States might provide in the form of feed-in-tariffs, grants or other mechanisms. 
Premije so lahko nespremenljive (tj. enake ne glede na tržne cene) ali spremenljive (tj. različne, odvisno od razvoja tržnih cen).35 Leta 2012, pred prvim sklepom o dodelitvi sredstev, je EIB obvestila Komisijo, da je vzdržnost predloženih načrtov financiranja močno odvisna od podpore, ki bi jo lahko države 35 Posebno poročilo št.
In some cases, 35 Special Report No 5/2018 “Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: significant potential synergies, but mostly unrealised”. 
5/2018 – Energija iz obnovljivih virov za trajnostni razvoj podeželja: znatne potencialne sinergije, ki pa so večinoma neizkoriščene.
projects had assumed that extra grants and subsidies from Member States would fully complement the NER300 grant to fund the relevant costs. 
V nekaterih primerih so nosilci projektov predvidevali, da bodo dodatna nepovratna sredstva in subvencije držav članic v celoti dopolnili nepovratna sredstva iz programa NER300 za pokrivanje relevantnih stroškov.
The EIB had noted that in most cases Member States had not yet clearly defined or agreed these support mechanisms at the closing of the project evaluation process. 
EIB je opozorila, da države članice v večini primerov ob zaključku postopka ocenjevanja projektov še niso jasno opredelile ali potrdile teh mehanizmov podpore.
From 201436, the Commission required Member States to use competitive bidding procedures for determining the support levels paid to renewable energy promoters. 
Od leta 201436 je Komisija od držav članic zahtevala, naj uporabljajo konkurenčne postopke za zbiranje ponudb za določitev višine podpore, ki se plača nosilcem projektov na področju energije iz obnovljive energije.
Before, Member States often used fixed feed-in-tariffs agreed with energy suppliers for long periods (e.g. 25 years). 
Pred tem so države članice pogosto uporabljale nespremenljive zagotovljene odkupne cene, dogovorjene z dobavitelji energije za daljša obdobja (npr. 25 let).
From 2017, competitive auctioning procedures should be the only subsidy model for operational support. 
Od leta 2017 pa bi morali biti konkurenčni dražbeni postopki edini model subvencioniranja za operativno podporo.
The new approach for providing such support to renewable energies would not have prevented Member States from continuing to support innovative demonstration projects. 
Novi pristop za zagotovitev tovrstne podpore za obnovljive vire energije ne bi preprečil tega, da države članice še naprej podpirajo inovativne demonstracijske projekte.
The Commission guidelines provided the possibility to seek a derogation from the bidding process for new technologies with higher costs per unit of energy produced. 
V smernicah Komisije je predvidena možnost zaprositve za odstopanje od dražbenega postopka za nove tehnologije z višjimi stroški na enoto proizvedene energije.
While national schemes for operational support were changing across the EU, NER300 projects conceived at the time of feed-in-tariffs were still trying to reach final investment decision. 
Medtem ko so se nacionalne sheme za operativno podporo po EU spreminjale, pa za projekte v okviru programa NER300, zasnovane v času zagotovljenih odkupnih cen, še vedno niso bile sprejete končne naložbene odločitve.
They therefore faced uncertainty about the availability of future operational support. 
Zato je bila razpoložljivost njihove prihodnje operativne podpore negotova.
Box 5 provides an example of a project that ultimately withdrew because of changes in the regulatory and financial support environment. 
V okviru 5 je naveden primer projekta, ki je bil nazadnje umaknjen zaradi sprememb na regulativnem področju in področju finančne podpore.
36 Communication from the Commission, Guidelines on State Aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 (2014/C 200/01) of 28 June 2014. 
31 36 Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom Smernice o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja in energijo za obdobje 2014–2020 (2014/C 200/01) z dne 28. junija 2014.
Also see the 2013 recommendations: Commission Staff Working Document, European Commission guidance for the design of renewables support schemes, accompanying the document ‘Communication from the Commission – Delivering the internal market in electricity and making the most of public intervention’, SWD(2013) 439 final of 5 November 2013. 
Glej tudi priporočila iz leta 2013: Delovni dokument služb Komisije z naslovom European Commission guidance for the design of renewables support schemes, accompanying the document „Communication from the Commission – Delivering the internal market in electricity and making the most of public intervention’, SWD(2013) 439 final z dne 5. novembra 2013.
Box 6 provides examples. 30 Yet the Member State’s energy policy changed during the lifetime of the NER300 scheme. 
Vendar je v življenjski dobi programa NER300 prišlo do spremembe energetske politike te države.
In 2016, the project reported that under a new competitive auctioning scheme, it had failed to secure revenue support because the Member State had removed the ring fencing for the ocean sector from that scheme. 
Leta 2016 je bilo za projekt sporočeno, da v okviru novega konkurenčnega dražbenega programa ni uspel zagotoviti dohodkovne podpore, saj je zadevna država članica v tem programu odpravila omejitev za morski sektor.
In absence of alternative funding sources to cover the ensuing funding gap, the project was not able to reach FID by 31 December 2016 and withdrew. 
Ker ni bilo alternativnih virov financiranja za zapolnitev nastale finančne vrzeli, do 31. decembra 2016 ni bilo mogoče sprejeti končne naložbene odločitve za projekt, ki je bil zato umaknjen.
Box 6 – EEPR CCS projects and regulatory uncertainty The EEPR project in Germany started works early after it had already successfully deployed a pilot plant and associated onshore storage facility. 
Okvir 6 – Projekti CCS v okviru programa EEPO in regulativna negotovost Dela na projektu v okviru programa EEPO v Nemčiji so se začela izvajati kmalu potem, ko sta začela delovati pilotna elektrarna in z njo povezan kopenski obrat za skladiščenje.
Despite initial commitment from the Member State to this technology and project, delays in the transposition of the CCS Directive and the final design of the national CCS legislation made the project sponsor decide that the project was unviable. 
Kljub prvotni zavezanosti države članice tej tehnologiji in projektu se je sponzor projekta zaradi zamud pri prenosu direktive o CCS v nacionalno zakonodajo in končnem oblikovanju nacionalne zakonodaje o CCS odločil, da projekt ni ekonomsko vzdržen.
It thus cancelled the project in 2013 while the Commission had already paid out 15 million euro. 
Zato je leta 2013 preklical projekt, Komisija pa je medtem že izplačala 15 milijonov EUR.
In October 2012, the government did not select this project for support, even if it had endorsed its inclusion in the original list of pre-selected projects for EEPR in 2009. 
Vlada oktobra 2012 tega projekta ni izbrala za podporo, čeprav je podprla njegovo vključitev na prvotni seznam predhodno izbranih projektov za program EEPO v letu 2009.
The project then also failed to get a NER300 grant in 2012. 
Za projekt nato tudi niso bila pridobljena nepovratna sredstva iz programa NER300 v letu 2012.
However, the Commission paid a total of €120 million to this project since 2009 under EEPR. 
Vendar je Komisija v okviru programa EEPO od leta 2009 za ta projekt skupaj izplačala 120 milijonov EUR.
Not getting the expected public support from other sources and prolonged discussions between the Member State and the Commission on how the project might be supported through other mechanisms at later stages compromised the viability of the project and the value obtained for the paid EU funds. 
Ker ni bila zagotovljena pričakovana javna podpora iz drugih virov in ker se je razprava med zadevno državo članico in Komisijo o možnostih podpiranja projekta z drugimi mehanizmi v poznejših fazah zavlekla, sta bili ogroženi ekonomska vzdržnost projekta in vrednost, pridobljena z izplačanimi sredstvi EU.
Regulatory regimes and financial support mechanisms for innovative renewables aim to contribute to achieving Member State and EU climate and energy objectives. 
Cilj regulativnih ureditev in mehanizmov finančne podpore za inovativne obnovljive vire energije je prispevati k doseganju podnebnih in energetskih ciljev držav članic in EU.
objectives (i.e. towards 2050 and beyond). 
Usklajeni bi morali biti z mednarodnimi podnebnimi sporazumi in dolgoročnimi cilji glede zmanjšanja emisij (tj. do leta 2050 in po njem).
However, when such climate and energy objectives are not clearly established (e.g. enacted in law) and do not have a stable long term outlook, this creates further uncertainty harming the investment conditions for this type of innovative and risky projects. 
Vendar če ti podnebni in energetski cilji niso jasno določeni (npr. v zakonodaji) in nimajo stabilne dolgoročne vizije, to ustvarja dodatno negotovost in škodi naložbenim pogojem za tovrstne inovativne in tvegane projekte.
Box 7 describes briefly how there is still much work to be done on this matter. 
V okviru 7 je na kratko opisano, kaj vse je treba v zvezi s tem še storiti.
31 Box 7 – Low carbon development strategies and their impact on energy innovation Under the 2013 EU Monitoring Mechanism Regulation (MMR), Member States were required to submit to the European Environment Agency by 2015 their ‘Low-Carbon Development Strategies’ for 2050, and report progress in March 2017. 
Okvir 7 – Razvojne strategije za nizkoogljično gospodarstvo in njihov učinek na inovacije na področju energije V skladu z uredbo EU o mehanizmu za spremljanje (MMR) iz leta 2013 so morale države članice Evropski agenciji za okolje (EEA) do leta 2015 predložiti svoje razvojne strategije za nizkoogljično gospodarstvo za obdobje do leta 2050 in marca 2017 poročati o napredku.
According to a recent study38, by 2017, only thirteen out of twenty-eight Member States had strategies that qualified as low carbon development strategies under criteria developed by the project. 
Glede na nedavno študijo38 je imelo do leta 2017 le 13 od 28 držav članic strategije, ki v skladu z merili, določenimi v okviru projekta, štejejo za razvojne strategije za nizkoogljično gospodarstvo.
The study reported that the quality of the strategies submitted varies a lot and that not all strategies and policies included in these documents are enacted in law. 
Študija je pokazala, da je kakovost predloženih strategij zelo različna ter da v zakonodajo niso vključene vse strategije in politike iz teh dokumentov. bile predložene ponudbe, za nekatere pa je bila vložena tudi vloga za nepovratna sredstva iz programa NER300.
The proposed Energy Union Regulation of November 2016 requires Member States to produce national energy and climate plans (NCEPs) for the period from 2021 to 2030 and later decades on a rolling basis. 
V predlagani uredbi o energetski uniji iz novembra 2016 je določeno, da morajo države članice pripraviti nacionalne energetske in podnebne načrte (NCEP) za obdobje 2021–2030 in nato za vsa naslednja desetletja.
Member States will also have to prepare and report to the Commission by January 2020 and every ten years their long-term low emission strategies with a 50 years perspective. 
Države članice bodo morale do januarja 2020 in nato vsakih deset let pripraviti in predložiti Komisiji svoje dolgoročne strategije za nizkoogljično gospodarstvo za prihodnjih 50 let.