natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
At the start of each programming period the Commission makes prefinancing payments to the Member States. 
4.13 Komisija na začetku vsakega programskega obdobja izvrši plačila predfinanciranja državam članicam.
The financing of a project generally takes the form of the reimbursement of costs based on expenditure declarations by the project promoters. 
Projekti se običajno financirajo v obliki povračila stroškov na podlagi izjav o odhodkih, ki jih predložijo nosilci projektov.
These individual declarations are aggregated for each priority axis of the OP into periodic expen­ diture declarations certified by the Member State authorities and submitted to the Commission. 
Te posa­ mezne izjave se za vsako prednostno os operativnega programa združijo v redne izjave o odhodkih, ki jih potrdijo organi držav članic, nato pa se predložijo Komisiji.
This expenditure is then co-financed from the EU budget. 
Nato se ti odhodki sofinancirajo iz proračuna EU.
4.14. Theeligibilityrulesarelaiddownatnational(or sometimes regional) level, subject to exceptions in the specific regulations for each Fund. 
4.14 Pravila o upravičenosti so določena na nacionalni (ali včasih regionalni) ravni, ob upoštevanju izjem v posameznih uredbah, ki veljajo za vsak sklad.
Member States bear primary responsibility for preventing or detecting and correcting irregular expenditure, and for reporting on this to the Commission. 
Države članice so primarno odgovorne za preprečevanje ali odkrivanje in popravljanje nepravilnih odhodkov in morajo o tem poročati Komisiji.
4.15. TheCommissionhastoobtainassurancethatthe Member States have set up management and control systems which meet the requirements of the regulations, and that the systems function effectively. 
4.15 Komisija mora pridobiti zagotovilo, da so države članice vzpostavile upravljavske in kontrolne sisteme, ki izpol­ njujejo zahteve iz uredb, in da ti sistemi uspešno delujejo.
If the Commission finds that a Member State has failed to correct irregular expenditure or that there are serious failings in the management and control systems, it may interrupt or suspend payments (3). 
Če Komisija ugotovi, da država članica ni popravila nepravilnih odhodkov ali da so v upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemih hujše pomanjkljivosti, lahko prekine ali začasno ustavi plačila (3).
If the Member State does not withdraw the irregular expenditure (which may be replaced by expenditure which is eligible) or does not remedy the detected system failures, the Commission may apply financial corrections, leading to a net reduction in EU funding (4). 
Če država članica ne umakne nepravilnih odhodkov (ki jih lahko nadomesti z upravičenimi odhodki) ali če ne popravi napak, ki so bile odkrite v sistemih, lahko Komisija izvede finančne popravke, s katerimi zmanjša neto financiranje iz EU (4).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S _____________ (3) Article 39(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E _____________ (3) Člen 39(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1260/1999 (UL L 161, 26.6.1999, str.
1); Articles 91 and 92 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 
1); člena 91 in 92 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2004 (UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
(4) Article 99 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 4.14. 
(4) Člen 99 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
4.15. The annual activity reports of DG REGIO and DG EMPL provide detailed assessments of the Commission assurance on the set up and subsequent functioning of management and control systems for each co-financed programme as well for the first time in the report for 2010 an overall assessment of national control systems. 
4.14 4.15 Letna poročila o dejavnostih GD REGIO in GD EMPL zagotavljajo natančne ocene zagotovila Komisije glede vzpostavitve in poznejšega delovanja upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov za vsak program, ki se sofinancira, poleg tega pa poročilo za leto 2010 prvič vsebuje tudi splošno oceno nacionalnih kontrolnih sistemov.
The establishment of eligibility rules at national level (Article 56 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006) was one of the main elements of simplification introduced in the 2007-2013 programme period. 
Določitev pravil o upravičenosti na nacionalni ravni (člen 56 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.1083/2006) je bila eden glavnih elementov poenostavitve, uvedenih v programskem obdobju 2007–2013.
It aimed at providing Member States with more flexibility in adapting eligibility rules to the specific needs of regions or programmes and to harmonise them with rules in force for other, national public schemes. 
Državam članicam naj bi zagotovila več prožnosti pri prilagoditvi pravil o upravičenosti posebnim potrebam regij ali programov ter njihovi uskladitvi z veljavnimi pravili za druge, nacio­ nalne javne sheme.
EN 106 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Energy and transport 4.16. Energy and transport accounts for 7 % of spending in this policy group. 
SL 106 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A Energetika in promet 4.16 Energetikainprometpredstavljata7%porabevtej skupini politik.
Around 30% of energy and transport expenditure is for major projects under the Trans-European Networks (TEN) programme. 
Približno 30 % odhodkov za energetiko in promet je namenjenih velikim projektom v okviru programa vseevropskih omrežij (TEN).
The other main category of expenditure (27 %) is for projects concerning conventional and renewable energies, largely in the form of grants and subsidies under the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR). 
Druga velika kategorija odhodkov (27 %) so odhodki za projekte v zvezi s tradicionalnimi in obnovljivimi vrstami energije, v veliki meri v obliki donacij in subvencij v okviru Evropskega energetskega programa za oživitev (EEPO).
Another 8% of the spending is for research projects mainly funded by the Research framework programmes. 
Nadaljnjih 8 % porabe je namenjenih razisko­ valnim projektom, ki se v glavnem financirajo iz okvirnih programov za raziskave.
Management and control of energy and transport spending 4.17. TheCommissionimplementsEnergyandTransport expenditure under direct and indirect centralised management (through two Executive Agencies and a Joint Undertaking (5)), but also by joint management (such as nuclear decommis­ sioning funds). 
Upravljanje in nadziranje porabe za energetiko in promet 4.17 Komisijaodhodkezaenergetikoinprometizvršujev okviru neposrednega in posrednega centraliziranega upravljanja (prek dveh izvajalskih agencij in skupnega podjetja (5) ter v okviru skupnega upravljanja (kot so skladi za jedrsko razgradnjo).
Payments for approved projects are made directly by the Commission to beneficiaries, based on grant agreements or Commission financing decisions. 
Plačila na podlagi sporazumov o donaciji ali svojih sklepov o financiranju za odobrene projekte nakaže nepo­ sredno upravičencem.
These are usually Member State authorities but may also be public or private companies. 
To so običajno organi držav članic, lahko pa so tudi javna ali zasebna podjetja.
Payments are made in instalments: an advance (pre-financing) upon signature of the grant agreement or financing decision, followed by interim and final payments to reimburse eligible expenditure reported by beneficiaries. 4.19. 
Plačila se izvršijo v več obrokih: s predplačilom (predfinanciranje) ob podpisu sporazuma o donaciji ali sklepa o financiranju, ki mu sledijo vmesna in končna plačila, s katerimi se povrnejo upravičeni odhodki, o katerih so poročali upravičenci.
The principal elements of control of the expenditure by the Commission include the evaluation of proposals against specified selection and award criteria; the provision of information and guidance to beneficiaries; monitoring and verification of the implementation of projects based on financial and technical progress reports submitted by bene­ ficiaries (including where required by the financing agreement the submission of financial statements certified by an independent external auditor); and ex-post audits in order to detect and correct errors which may not have been prevented by earlier controls and to provide reasonable assurance of the regularity of the expenditure. _____________ (5) TEN-Transport Executive Agency, Executive Agency for Competi­ tiveness & Innovation and SESAR (Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research) Joint Undertaking. 
4.19 Glavni elementi kontrole odhodkov, ki jo izvaja Komi­ sija, vključujejo ocenjevanje predlogov glede na navedena merila za izbiro in odobritev, zagotavljanje informacij in navodil upravičencem, spremljanje in preverjanje izvajanja projektov na podlagi poročil o finančnem in tehničnem napredku, ki jih predložijo upravičenci (vključno s predložitvijo računovodskih izkazov, ki jih je potrdil neodvisni zunanji revizor, kadar to zahteva sporazum o financiranju) ter naknadne revizije za odkrivanje in popravljanje napak, ki morda niso bile odkrite s prejšnjimi kontrolami, in za prido­ bivanje razumnega zagotovila o pravilnosti odhodkov. _____________ (5) Izvajalska agencija za vseevropsko prometno omrežje, Izvajalska agencija za konkurenčnost in inovativnost in Skupno podjetje SESAR (raziskave o upravljanju zračnega prometa enotnega evrop­ skega neba).
If this is not detected by the different layers of control in the Member State, it leads to an incorrect certification of expenditure by the Member State. 
Če se z različnimi plastmi kontrol v državah članicah to ne odkrije, potem država članica potrdi napačne odhodke.
If not corrected by the Commission at the latest by the end of the programming period, this results in an overpayment from the EU budget to the OP concerned. 4.21. 
Če Komisija najpozneje do konca programskega obdobja tega ne popravi, pride do previsokih izplačil iz proračuna EU za zadevni opera­ tivni program.
ThoseinvolvedinimplementingOPsandprojectsat national or regional level may be unaware of the applicable rules or unsure about their correct interpretation. 
4.21 Tisti,kisodelujejopriizvajanjuoperativnihprogramov in projektov na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni morda ne poznajo veljavnih pravil ali niso prepričani o njihovi pravilni razlagi.
Additional risks result from the large number and diversity of the co-financed activities and the involvement of multiple, often small-scale, partners in the implementation of projects. 
Dodatna tveganja izhajajo iz številnih in raznolikih sofinanciranih dejavnosti in sodelovanja več pogosto majhnih partnerjev pri izvajanju projektov.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 4.20. Since the management and control system has a multi­ annual character, an overpayment detected in a payment claim reim­ bursed by the Commission may not have been yet subject to the entire control chain at national and EU level at the time of certification. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 4.20 Zaradi večletne narave upravljavskega in kontrolnega sistema previsoko izplačilo, odkrito pri enem od zahtevkov za plačila, ki jih povrne Komisija, v času potrditve morda še ni bilo obravnavano v celotni kontrolni verigi na nacionalni in evropski ravni.
The Commission focuses its supervisory role in providing guidance and training to the managing authorities on the appropriate way to carry out management verifications in detecting errors at beneficiary level before certification and closely cooperates with national audit authorities to rapidly audit the most risky programmes or authorities. 4.21. 
Komisija se pri svoji nadzorni vlogi osredotoča na zagotavljanje navodil in usposabljanja za upravljavske organe glede ustrezne izvedbe upravljavskih preverjanj pri ugotavljanju napak na ravni upravičencev pred potrditvijo ter tesno sodeluje z nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi, da se hitro izvedejo revizije najbolj tveganih programov ali organov.
The 2007-2013 regulatory framework provides that bene­ ficiaries are informed on specific conditions for funding and that the managing authorities satisfy themselves that beneficiaries have the capacity to fulfil those conditions (Article 13(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006). 
4.21 Regulativni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 zagotavlja, da so upravičenci obveščeni o posebnih pogojih financiranja in da se upra­ vljavski organi prepričajo, da lahko upravičenci te pogoje izpolnjujejo (člen 13(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1828/2006).
This condition is checked through the regular audit work conducted by Commission auditors. 
Ta pogoj se preveri z redno revizijo, ki jo izvedejo revizorji Komisije.
The Commission has also organised bilateral and multilateral training, and in particular seminars to ‘train the trainers’ to ensure that Member States continuously train, inform, advise and guide beneficiaries and implementing bodies. 
Komisija je organizirala tudi dvostranska in večstranska usposabljanja ter zlasti seminarje „usposabljanja za izvajalce usposabljanj“ in tako zagotovila, da države članice upravičence in izvajalske organe nenehno usposabljajo, obveščajo in vodijo ter jim svetujejo.
Such training is considered to be particularly useful in mitigating the risks associated with small-scale partners, such as NGOs working at regional and local level. 
Tovrstno usposa­ bljanje naj bi bilo še posebej koristno za zmanjševanje tveganj, pove­ zanih z manjšimi partnerji, kot so nevladne organizacije, dejavne na regionalni in lokalni ravni.
Moreover, the Commission has initiated actions in 2011 aiming at providing specific, focussed information and training to Member States, for which operational programmes were subject to reservations in the annual activity reports on a recurrent basis. 
Poleg tega je Komisija leta 2011 sprejela ukrepe, namenjene zagotavljanju posebnemu in ciljno usmerjenemu informiranju in usposabljanju za države članice, v zvezi s katerimi so v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih pogosto obstajali pridržki glede opera­ tivnih programov.
For TEN-Transport and TEN-Energy projects, however, it is mitigated by the fact that eligible expenditure often exceeds the co-financing threshold. 
Vendar je pri projektih v okviru TEN-promet in TEN-energetika to tveganje ublaženo, saj upravičeni odhodki pogosto presegajo prag za sofinanciranje.
EEPR funding in particular may support large, complex and transnational projects, and the need to disburse these funds rapidly may be detrimental to the application of adequate controls. 
Zlasti financiranje iz EEPO lahko podpira večje, zapletenejše in večnacionalne projekte in potreba po hitri razdelitvi teh sredstev lahko ogroža izvajanje ustreznih kontrol.
For the audit of Cohesion, Energy and Transport, the following specific points should be noted: — the Court’s audit involved examination of a sample of 243 interim and final payments (6), — the assessment of systems focused on Audit Authorities for the 2007-2013 programming period in Cohesion, and — the review on Commission management representations covered the Annual Activity Reports of DG Regional Policy, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, DG Mobility and Transport, and DG Energy. 
V zvezi z revizijo kohezije, energetike in prometa je treba navesti naslednje: — Sodišče je pri svoji reviziji uporabilo vzorec z 243 vmes­ nimi in končnimi plačili (6), — ocena sistemov na področju kohezije je bila osredotočena na revizijske organe za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 in — pregled poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije je zajemal letna poročila o dejavnostih za GD za regionalno politiko, GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje, GD za mobilnost in promet ter GD za energetiko.
REGULARITY OF TRANSACTIONS 4.24. Annex 4.1 contains a summary of the results of transaction testing. 
PRAVILNOST TRANSAKCIJ 4.24 V Prilogi 4.1 so povzeti rezultati preizkušanja tran­ sakcij.
The most likely error estimated by the Court is 7,7 % (7). 
Ocenjuje, da je najverjetnejša stopnja napake 7,7 % (7).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S _____________ (6) This sample comprises 243 payments made to 229 Cohesion projects (ERDF: 143, ESF: 60, CF: 20 and Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA): 6), 6 non-ESF social and employment projects and 8 Energy and Transport projects. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E _____________ (6) Vzorec vsebuje 243 plačil, izvršenih za 229 kohezijskih projektov (ESRR 143, ESS 60, KS 20, Instrument strukturnih politik v pred­ pristopnem obdobju (ISPA) 6), 6 socialnih projektov in projektov zaposlovanja zunaj ESS in 8 projektov v okviru energetike in prometa.
205 of the payments to Cohesion projects relate to the 2007-2013 programming period and 24 to the 2000-2006 period. 
205 plačil za kohezijske projekte se nanaša na programsko obdobje 2007–2013, 24 pa na obdobje 2000–2006.
The sample was drawn from all payments, with the exception of advances which amounted to 3,1 billion euro in 2010. 
Vzorec je bil izbran iz vseh plačil, razen predplačil, ki so v letu 2010 znašala 3,1 milijarde EUR.
(7) The Court calculates its estimate of error from a representative statistical sample. 
(7) Sodišče svojo oceno napake izračuna na podlagi reprezentativnega statističnega vzorca.
The figure quoted is the best estimate (known as the MLE). 
Navedena številka je najboljša ocena (znana kot najbolj verjetna stopnja napake).
The Court has 95 % confidence that the rate of error in the population lies between 4,7 % and 10,7 % (the lower and upper error limits respectively). _____________ (1) A lower error limit of 11-12 % compared to 4,7 % in 2010. 4.24. 
Sodišče ima 95-odstotno zaupanje, da je stopnja napake v populaciji med 4,7 % in 10,7 % (spodnja in zgornja meja napake). _____________ (1) Spodnja meja napake je znašala 11–12 %, medtem ko je leta 2010 znašala 4,7 %.
This result is particularly important since almost all operational programmes declared expenditure as from 2010, thus more than doubling the amount of declared expenditure for cohesion and increasing the inherent risk of error through the large number of actors now involved. 
4.24 Ta rezultat je še posebej pomemben, saj so bili od leta 2010 prija­ vljeni odhodki za skoraj vse operativne programe, zato se je znesek prijavljenih odhodkov za kohezijo več kot podvojil, zaradi številnih akterjev, ki so zdaj vključeni, pa se je tudi povečalo s tem povezano tveganje za napake.
The Commission notes that not all the errors reported by the Court will have a financial impact. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da ne bodo vse napake, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, imele finančnega vpliva.
The Commission notes that the large majority of high quantifiable errors with strong impact identified by the Court are concentrated in seven ERDF operational programmes of three Member States, out of the 16 Member States included in the Court's sample. 
Komisija opozarja, da je velika večina hudih količinsko opredeljivih napak z velikim vplivom, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, skoncentrirana v sedmih operativnih programih Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj iz treh od 16-ih držav članic, vključenih v vzorec Sodišča.
The Commission is taking measures to correct the errors detected by the Court and focuses its actions on the most risky programmes. 
Komisija sprejema ukrepe za odpravo napak, ki jih je odkrilo Sodišče, in se pri tem osredotoča na najbolj tvegane programe.
The Commission notes that, for the second consecutive year, the level of error remains well below those reported by the Court in the period 2006-2008 (1). 
Komisija opozarja, da je stopnja napak že drugo leto zapored precej pod stopnjo, ki jo je Sodišče navedlo za obdobje 2006–2008 (1).
The Commission considers that this positive and promising development reflects the reinforced control provisions of the 2007-2013 programming period and its 2008 Action Plan. 
Komisija meni, da ta pozitiven in obetaven razvoj odraža določbe glede okrepljene kontrole za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 in njegov akcijski načrt iz leta 2008.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 109 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 4.25. TheCourtconsidersthatsufficientinformationwas available for the Member State authorities to have detected and corrected at least some of the errors (prior to certifying the expenditure to the Commission) for 58 % of the transactions affected by error. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 109 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 4.25 Sodišče meni, da so imeli organi držav članic na voljo dovolj informacij, da bi lahko (pred potrditvijo odhodkov Komisiji) odkrili in popravili vsaj nekatere napake pri 58 % transakcij, na katere so vplivale napake.
One fifth of transactions affected by breaches of public procurement rules 4.26. TheCourtfounderrorsrelatedtonon-compliance with EU and national public procurement rules in 19 % of the 243 transactions audited. 
Na petino transakcij so vplivale kršitve pravil za oddajo javnega naročila 4.26 Sodišče je v 19% od 243 revidiranih transakcij odkrilo napake, povezane z neupoštevanjem pravil EU in nacionalnih pravil o javnih naročilih.
Serious failures to respect these rules were identified in 5 % of the transactions audited. 
V 5 % revidiranih tran­ sakcij je bilo ugotovljeno hudo neupoštevanje teh pravil.
They account for 24 % of all quantifiable errors and make up approximately 31% of the estimated error rate for this policy group (see example 4.1). 
Te transakcije predstavljajo 24% vseh količinsko opredeljivih napak in pomenijo približno 31 % ocenjene stopnje napake za to skupino politik (glej primer 4.1).
Example 4.1 Serious failures to respect public procurement rules (a) Unlawful award of a contract to an offer with an abnormally low price: In the case of an ERDF project, the Court found that a contract for the construction of harbour quays was awarded to a bidder whose price offer was abnormally low. 
Primer 4.1 Resne kršitve pravil o javnih naročilih (a) Nezakonita dodelitev pogodbe ponudbi z nenormalno nizko ceno: pri enem projektu ESRR je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je bila pogodba za gradnjo pristaniških pomolov dodeljena ponudniku z nenormalno nizko cenovno ponudbo.
According to the national legislation this should have led to the rejection of the bid since the feasibility of the offer was not assured at the price proposed. 
Po nacionalni zakonodaji bi morala biti ponudba zaradi tega zavrnjena, saj predlagana cena ni zagotavljala izvedljivosti ponudbe.
The bidder with the second lowest offer successfully appealed against the award decision in a national administrative court. 
Ponudnik z drugo najnižjo ponudbo se je na nacionalnem upravnem sodišču uspešno pritožil na sklep o dodelitvi.
Nevertheless, despite this ruling by a national court, the expenditure was certified to the Commission following completion of the project in 2009. 
Kljub takšni sodbi nacionalnega sodišča so bili odhodki po dokončanju projekta leta 2009 potrjeni Komisiji.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 4.25. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 4.25 Komisija te primere dosledno spremlja za zagotovitev, da bodo zadevni sistemi v prihodnosti bolje preprečevali napake pred potrditvijo.
However, on-the-spot verifications on operations may also intervene at a later stage of project implementation, after certification and up to closure, which explains why part of the errors in the Court's sample could not be detected (see Commission reply to paragraph 4.20). 
Vendar pa se lahko preverjanja na kraju samem izvedejo tudi v poznejši fazi izvajanja projekta, to je v času med potrditvijo in zaključkom, zato dela napak iz vzorca Sodišča ni bilo mogoče odkriti (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 4.20).
The impact of the control system in reducing error rates is usually only seen in subsequent years, after all layers of controls have been implemented. 4.26. 
Vpliv kontrolnega sistema na zmanj­ šanje stopnje napak je običajno viden šele v naslednjih letih, ko so izvedene vse plasti kontrol.
While the Commission and the Court audit compliance with public procurement rules in the same way, the Commission applies proportionate flat-rate corrections thereby properly addressing the risk of damage to the EU budget (see point 11 of Annex 1.1 to Chapter 1). 
4.26 Medtem ko Komisija in Sodišče na isti način preverjata skladnost s pravili o javnih naročilih, pa Komisija uporablja soraz­ merne pavšalne popravke in tako ustrezno obravnava tveganje škode za proračun EU (glej točko 11 Priloge 1.1 v poglavju 1).