natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
More recently, the Commission and the EIF have planned to implement a more systematic exit from fund holdings, through sales on the secondary market of fund interests. 
Komisija in Evropski investicijski sklad sta nedavno načrtovala izvedbo bolj sistematičnega izstopa iz imetja skladov, in sicer s prodajo deležev skladov na sekundarnem trgu.
Cross-investments for a limited amount are allowed as a specific lesson learnt from the predecessor programme. 
Navzkrižne naložbe v omejenem znesku so dovoljene na podlagi posebne izkušnje, pridobljene v okviru predhodnega programa.
The Commission points out that the operational reporting on the EFSI SME Window equity product produced by the EIF does provide the necessary details. 
Komisija opozarja, da operativna poročila o lastniškem produktu dela za MSP v okviru EFSI, ki jih pripravlja Evropski investicijski sklad, ne zagotavljajo potrebnih podrobnosti.
It may, however, indeed be seen as complex, due to the fact that the underlying reality is also very complex. 
Vsekakor pa se lahko štejejo za zapletena, saj je zelo zapleteno tudi dejansko stanje, na katerem temeljijo.
According to InvestEurope data, the share of funds from public investors rose from 2007, peaking in 2011 at 34.7%, and then dropped and was very volatile, rising and declining until 2018. 
Po podatkih združenja InvestEurope se je delež sredstev javnih vlagateljev od leta 2007 povečeval, leta 2011 dosegel vrh pri 34,7 %, potem pa se je zmanjšal in je bil zelo nestanoviten, saj se je do leta 2018 povečeval in zmanjševal.
The EUR 1.4 billion committed by the EIF in 2018 should be compared with EUR 11.4 billion which was overall 2018 fundraising for venture capital in the EU. 
8
Therefore the EIF in 2018 represented 12% of fundraising in the EU in this market segment. 
8
In addition, the EIF 8 uses many mandates for this activity, including commercial ones and EIF’s own resources. 
Poleg tega Evropski investicijski sklad za to dejavnost uporablja veliko mandatov, tudi komercialne mandate in svoja lastna sredstva.
The EUR 214 million which the EIF channelled to the market in 2018 with the support of the audited instruments represented only approx. 1.9% of overall EU venture fundraising. 
Sredstva v znesku 214 milijonov EUR, ki jih je Evropski investicijski sklad leta 2018 usmeril v trg ob podpori revidiranih instrumentov, so predstavljala le približno 1,9 % vseh zbranih sredstev tveganega kapitala v EU.
The role of EU supported mandates is therefore to focus on market gaps where public support is needed the most. 
Vloga mandatov, ki jih podpira EU, je torej osredotočiti se na tržne vrzeli, ki najbolj potrebujejo javno podporo.
The Commission notes that an EIF investment in a fund is often considered as a seal of approval, a quality hallmark of the deal. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da se naložbe Evropskega investicijskega sklada v sklad pogosto štejejo za „žig odobritve“ ali znak kakovosti posla.
Many categories of investors rely on EIF’s involvement in order to make their own investments in the same fund. 
Veliko kategorij vlagateljev pri odločitvi o naložbah v nek sklad upošteva, ali v ta sklad vlaga tudi Evropski investicijski sklad.
Such a reputation can only be maintained through a high quality assessment and due diligence process, which unavoidably takes time. 
Tak ugled je mogoče ohranjati le na podlagi visokokakovostne ocene in postopka skrbnega pregleda, za kar pa je neizogibno potreben čas.
In addition, the length of the process is bound to differ from applicant to applicant (e.g. under the European programmes first time managers are eligible for which the due diligence process is more complex than for established management teams). 
Poleg tega se trajanje postopka med vlagatelji vlog razlikuje (npr. v okviru evropskih programov so upravičeni upravitelji začetniki, za katere je postopek skrbnega pregleda bolj zapleten kot za uveljavljene ekipe za upravljanje).
Delays can also arise due to an applicant’s slow response to EIF’s requests for information, a factor that is outside EIF’s control. 
Razlog za zamude je lahko tudi počasen odziv vlagateljev na zahteve Evropskega investicijskega sklada po informacijah, česar Evropski investicijski sklad ne more nadzirati.
Complementarity of the mandates derives from other criteria than simply being able to target different risk segments, especially as all venture capital investments can be considered very risky. 
Dopolnjevanje mandatov ne izhaja zgolj iz zmožnosti usmerjanja v različne segmente tveganja, ampak tudi iz drugih meril, zlasti ker se lahko vse naložbe tveganega kapitala štejejo za zelo tvegane.
Mandates can complement each other in situations of restrictions on investable amounts, scarcity of resources, geographic coverage, etc. For each High Growth and Innovative SME Facility (GIF) investment, the resource allocation was described clearly in the request for approval the EIF submitted to the Commission, and the Commission carefully considered this combination and finally approved it or requested modifications. 
Mandati se lahko dopolnjujejo z vidika omejitev zneskov morebitnih naložb, pomanjkanja virov, geografske pokritosti itd. Za vsako naložbo v pomoč za hitro rastoča in inovativna MSP (GIF) je bila dodelitev sredstev jasno opisana v prošnji za odobritev, ki jo je Evropski investicijski sklad predložil Komisiji, Komisija pa je to kombinacijo pozorno proučila in jo nazadnje odobrila ali zahtevala spremembe.
Therefore, for the 30% of investments identified by the ECA, the instrument explored its complementarity with other mandates. 
Zato je instrument pri 30 % naložb, ki jih je opredelilo Evropsko računsko sodišče, proučil svoje dopolnjevanje z drugimi mandati.
It seems that for the remaining 70% of the GIF investments complementarity with other mandates was ensured automatically, as there was no co-investment with other mandates. 
Zdi se, da je bilo pri ostalih 70 % naložb v GIF dopolnjevanje z drugimi mandati samodejno zagotovljeno, saj ni bilo sovlaganja iz drugih mandatov.
The appropriate level of complementarity referred to by the EFSI regulation is ensured via the policy positioning of the Risk Capital Resource mandate and the EFSI mandates, and reflected in the EIF’s deal allocation process. 
Ustrezna raven dopolnjevanja, na katero se sklicuje uredba o EFSI, se zagotovi s političnim pozicioniranjem mandata v zvezi z viri tveganega kapitala in mandatov EFSI ter je upoštevana v postopku dodeljevanja sredstev Evropskega investicijskega sklada.
In the Commission’s view the 2018 deal allocation policy clearly takes into account the focus of individual mandates and tries to identify the best investment source for each opportunity. 
Komisija meni, da politika dodeljevanja sredstev iz leta 2018 očitno upošteva usmerjenost posameznih mandatov in si prizadeva opredeliti najboljši vir naložb za vsako priložnost.
The policy was presented to the Commission, and the EIF committed to regularly discuss any updates of the policy with the Commission. 
Politika je bila predstavljena Komisiji, Evropski investicijski sklad pa se je zavezal, da bo s Komisijo redno obravnaval kakršne koli posodobitve politike.
The choice of sectors is mostly based on market needs  e.g. innovation is a cross-sectoral characteristic  therefore EU mandates do not have a sectoral "preference" as such. 
Izbira sektorjev temelji predvsem na potrebah trga, na primer inovativnost je medsektorska značilnost, zato mandati EU ne dajejo prednosti določenemu sektorju kot takemu.
Geographical distribution is the result of the applications received and assessment of policy fit and eligibility, where bigger and more developed markets tend to create more investment opportunities. 
Geografska porazdelitev temelji na prejetih vlogah ter oceni ustreznosti glede na politiko in upravičenosti, pri čemer večji in razvitejši trgi običajno ustvarjajo več naložbenih priložnosti.
PDF ISBN 978-92-847-3562-4 doi:10.2865/391626 QJ-AB-19-015-EN-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-3530-3 doi:10.2865/754636 QJ-AB-19-015-EN-Q 
PDF ISBN 978-92-847-3572-3 doi:10.2865/708632 QJ-AB-19-015-SL-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-3533-4 doi:10.2865/614986 QJ-AB-19-015-SL-Q
The EU provides money to venture capital funds for investment mainly in start-ups and innovative emerging firms. 
EU zagotavlja sredstva skladom tveganega kapitala za naložbe, namenjene predvsem zagonskim in inovativnim novonastalim podjetjem.
This audit assessed six centrally managed interventions that have been implemented since 1998. 
Pri tej reviziji je bilo ocenjenih šest centralno upravljanih intervencij, ki so se izvajale od leta 1998.
The EIF manages these interventions on behalf of the Commission. 
Evropski investicijski sklad te intervencije upravlja v imenu Komisije.
We found that the Commission increased its financial support over the years without fully assessing market needs or absorption capacity. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je Komisija z leti povečala svojo finančno podporo, ne da bi v celoti ocenila potrebe trga ali absorpcijsko sposobnost.
Its investment strategy was not comprehensive, and less developed venture capital markets benefited little. 
Njena naložbena strategija ni bila celovita in manj razviti trgi tveganega kapitala so imeli le malo koristi.
EN 2019 Special Report 18 EU greenhouse gas emissions: Well reported, but better insight needed into future reductions NO 1 
SL 2019 Posebno poročilo 18 Emisije toplogrednih plinov v EU: poročanje o njih je dobro, toda potreben bo boljši vpogled v prihodnja zmanjšanja št.
Contents Executive summary Introduction International context European context Audit scope and approach Observations The Commission checks and reports EU emission data appropriately EU reports meet and exceed international requirements The Commission and EEA quality review of the reported emissions is satisfactory The EU greenhouse gas inventory has improved over time The EU needs better insight into future greenhouse gas emission reductions The Commission and EEA help Member States improve the quality of their projections The Commission did not assess the risk of significant deviations from the EU reference scenario EU 2020 emission targets cover most of the sectors for which data is available The Commission has developed sectoral roadmaps covering almost 70 % of emissions Reporting on EU policies and measures is incomplete Conclusions and recommendations Annex – Information on greenhouse gases Acronyms and abbreviations Paragraph I-VIII 01-15 01-05 06-15 16-21 22-65 22-40 23-27 28-34 35-40 41-65 42-46 47-50 51-55 56-58 59-65 66-75 2 
Vsebina Povzetek Uvod Mednarodno ozadje Evropsko ozadje Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Opažanja Komisija podatke o emisijah v EU ustrezno preverja in sporoča Poročila EU izpolnjujejo in presegajo mednarodne zahteve Pregled kakovosti sporočenih emisij, ki sta ga opravila Komisija in EEA, je zadovoljiv Evidenca toplogrednih plinov EU se je s časom izboljšala EU potrebuje boljši vpogled v prihodnja zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov Komisija in EEA pomagata državam članicam izboljšati kakovost njihovih projekcij Komisija ni ocenila tveganja bistvenih odstopanj od referenčnega scenarija EU Cilji EU za emisije za leto 2020 zajemajo večino sektorjev, za katere so na voljo podatki Komisija je pripravila sektorske časovne načrte, ki zajemajo skoraj 70 % emisij Poročanje o politikah in ukrepih EU je nepopolno Zaključki in priporočila Priloga – Informacije o toplogrednih plinih Kratice in okrajšave Glosar Odstavek I–VIII 01–15 01–05 06–15 16–21 22–65 22–40 23–27 28–34 35–40 41–65 42–46 47–50 51–55 56–58 59–65 66–75 2
Glossary Replies of the Commission Audit team Timeline 3 
Odgovori Komisije Revizijska ekipa Časovnica 3
Executive summary I The EU, as a party to the Kyoto Protocol (1997) and the Paris Agreement (2015), is committed to take part in the global effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 
Povzetek I EU je kot podpisnica Kjotskega protokola (1997) in Pariškega sporazuma (2015) zavezana sodelovanju v globalnih prizadevanjih za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov.
In line with these agreements, the EU is aiming for a 20 % reduction in greenhouse gases by 2020, a 40 % reduction by 2030 and an 80-95 % reduction by 2050. 
V skladu s tema sporazumoma je njen cilj 20-odstotno zmanjšanje toplogrednih plinov do leta 2020, 40-odstotno do leta 2030 in 80–95-odstotno do leta 2050.
To assess progress towards these targets, the Commission needs estimates of past and projected emissions, and of the effects of policies and measures aimed at reducing emissions. 
Da bi Komisija ocenila napredek pri uresničevanju teh ciljev, potrebuje ocene sedanjih emisij in njihovih projekcij ter učinkov politik in ukrepov za njihovo zmanjšanje.
Our landscape review on EU action on energy and climate change of 2017 identified inventories of greenhouse gas emissions as an area of potential risk in which limited audit work had taken place. 
Sodišče je v svojem panoramskem pregledu iz leta 2017 z naslovom Ukrepanje EU na področju energetike in podnebnih sprememb opredelilo evidence toplogrednih plinov kot področje morebitnega tveganja, na katerem je bilo revizijsko delo omejeno.
II Our audit focused on efforts of the Commission, assisted by the European Environment Agency (EEA), to ensure the quality of the EU greenhouse gas inventory and of the information on future emission reductions. 
II Pri reviziji se je Sodišče osredotočilo na prizadevanja Komisije, da s pomočjo Evropske agencije za okolje (EEA) zagotovi kakovost evidence toplogrednih plinov EU in informacij o prihodnjih zmanjšanjih emisij.
We found that the EU emission data is appropriately reported, but that the Commission needs better insight into future greenhouse gas emission reductions. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se podatki o emisijah v EU ustrezno sporočajo, da pa mora Komisija imeti boljši vpogled v prihodnja zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov.
III The Commission reports on greenhouse gases to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Secretariat in line with international requirements, and provides additional data to the European Parliament and the Council. 
III Komisija v skladu z mednarodnimi zahtevami poroča o toplogrednih plinih sekretariatu Okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: konvencija UNFCCC) in zagotavlja dodatne podatke Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
To ensure the quality of this data, the Monitoring Mechanism Regulation and its implementing rules set out an EU system for reviewing Member States’ greenhouse gas inventories. 
Da bi se zagotovila kakovost teh podatkov, uredba o mehanizmu za spremljanje podnebja in njena izvedbena pravila določajo sistem EU za pregledovanje evidenc toplogrednih plinov držav članic.
Our work showed that the Commission, assisted by the EEA, verifies satisfactorily the reported emissions and that the EU greenhouse gas inventories have improved over time. 
Delo Sodišča je pokazalo, da Komisija s pomočjo agencije EEA zadovoljivo preverja sporočene emisije in da so se evidence toplogrednih plinov EU skozi čas izboljšale.
However, for the land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF) sector, the reviewers do not perform the same types of checks as for other sectors. 
Vendar pa pregledovalci za sektor rabe zemljišč, spremembe rabe zemljišč in gozdarstva (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LULUCF) ne opravljajo iste vrste pregledov kot za ostale sektorje.
This sector is particularly relevant not only for the 2030 targets, but also because the LULUCF data has a high statistical uncertainty. 
Ta sektor je posebej pomemben za cilje za leto 2030 in tudi zato, ker je za podatke sektorja LULUCF značilna velika statistična negotovost.
IV The Monitoring Mechanism Regulation also established an EU system for reviewing data on Member States’ projections. 
IV Z uredbo o mehanizmu za spremljanje podnebja je bil uveden tudi sistem EU za pregled podatkov o projekcijah držav članic.
The Commission and UNFCCC review both identified fewer issues in 2017 than in 2015, indicating an improvement in national projections. 
V pregledu Komisije in tudi konvencije UNFCCC je bilo leta 2017 ugotovljeno manj zadev kot leta 2015, kar kaže na izboljšanje nacionalnih projekcij.
However, the Commission did not assess the risk of significant deviations from the EU reference scenario. 
Vendar Komisija ni ocenila tveganja bistvenih odstopanj od referenčnega scenarija EU.
V For achieving emission reductions, the EU has put in place targets which include most of the reported data. 
V Da bi se doseglo zmanjšanje emisij, je EU postavila cilje, ki vključujejo večino sporočenih podatkov.
For the LULUCF sector the first EU targets are for 2030, while for international shipping the internationally agreed target is for 2050. 
Za sektor LULUCF so prvi cilji EU določeni za leto 2030, za 4 mednarodni ladijski promet pa mednarodno dogovorjeni cilj velja za leto 2050.
International aviation is already included in the EU 2020 targets. 
Mednarodno letalstvo je že zajeto v ciljih strategije Evropa 2020.
VI We found that long-term sectoral roadmaps cover almost 70 % of the emissions reported. 
VI Sodišče je ugotovilo, da dolgoročni sektorski časovni načrti zajemajo skoraj 70 % sporočenih emisij.
Such specific roadmaps are crucial for the development of the respective sectors in a sustainable way. However, there are no specific roadmaps for some key sectors, such as agriculture and LULUCF. 
Takšni posebni časovni načrti so ključni za trajnostni razvoj zadevnih sektorjev, vendar posebnih časovnih načrtov za nekatere ključne sektorje, kot sta kmetijstvo in LULUCF, ni.
This affects the sectoral shorter-term policies and measures. 
To vpliva na sektorske kratkoročnejše politike in ukrepe.
VII Mitigation policies and measures aim to reduce future emissions. 
VII Namen politik in ukrepov za blažitev so prihodnja zmanjšanja emisij.
The Commission and the EEA have introduced checks on the quality of the information submitted by Member States on their mitigation policies and measures. However, the Commission did not report estimates for some EU policies and measures’ impacts on emissions. 
Komisija in agencija EEA sta uvedli preglede kakovosti informacij, ki jih države članice predložijo o svojih politikah in ukrepih za blažitev podnebnih sprememb, vendar Komisija ni sporočila ocen vplivov nekaterih politik in ukrepov EU na emisije.
VIII Based on these findings, we make recommendations to the Commission aimed at improving: (a) the Commission review process for the LULUCF sector; (b) the framework for future emission reductions. 5 
VIII Sodišče na podlagi teh ugotovitev daje Komisiji priporočila za izboljšanje: (a) postopka pregleda za sektor LULUCF in (b) okvira za prihodnja zmanjšanja emisij. 5
Introduction International context 01 Greenhouse gases absorb and release heat (infra-red radiation from the sun) in the atmosphere. 
Uvod Mednarodno ozadje 01 Toplogredni plini absorbirajo toploto (infrardeče sevanje sonca) in jo sproščajo v ozračje.
The Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) is the United Nations body for assessing the science related to climate change. 
Medvladni odbor za podnebne spremembe (IPCC) je organ Združenih narodov za ocenjevanje znanosti, povezane s podnebnimi spremembami.
It estimates that human-induced greenhouse gas emissions have caused global temperatures to rise by approximately 1.0 °C above pre-industrial levels to date. 
Po njegovih ocenah so emisije toplogrednih plinov, ki jih povzroči človek, doslej povzročile dvig globalnih temperatur na svetovni ravni za približno 1,0 °C v primerjavi s predindustrijsko ravnjo.
The subsequent effects of this increase include sea level rises and more extreme weather events. 
Med nadaljnjimi učinki tega povečanja so dvig morske gladine in bolj ekstremni vremenski pojavi.
02 In 1992, the global nations signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), aiming to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations “at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic (human-induced) interference with the climate system”. 
02 Leta 1992 so države vsega sveta podpisale konvencijo UNFCCC, da bi se dosegla ustalitev koncentracij toplogrednih plinov v ozračju na ravni, ki bo preprečevala nevarno antropogeno poseganje (ki ga povzroči človek) v podnebni sistem.
Further steps were taken in 1997 with the Kyoto Protocol, which put measures in place and introduced binding emission reduction targets for the developed countries that signed it. 
Leta 1997 so bili sprejeti nadaljnji koraki v okviru Kjotskega protokola, s katerim so bili uvedeni ukrepi in zavezujoči cilji glede zmanjšanja emisij za razvite države, ki so ga podpisale.
As part of the Kyoto Protocol, the developed countries also committed to setting out policies and measures to support the achievement of the emission reduction targets in the Protocol in a sustainable way. 
Te države so se v okviru Kjotskega protokola zavezale tudi, da bodo določile politike in ukrepe za podporo trajnostnemu doseganju ciljev zmanjšanja emisij iz protokola.
The UNFCCC Secretariat monitors and reports on the Convention and the Kyoto Protocol’s enforcement. 
Sekretariat konvencije UNFCCC spremlja izvajanje te konvencije in Kjotskega protokola ter o tem poroča.
03 The Paris Agreement (2015) was signed by 197 countries. The aim of the agreement is to limit the increase in the global average temperature to “well below” 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, and to promote efforts to limit the global average temperature increase “even further”, to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels. 
03 Pariški sporazum (2015) je podpisalo 197 držav, namenjen pa je omejitvi dviga povprečne globalne temperature „znatno pod” 2 °C v primerjavi s predindustrijsko ravnjo in spodbujanju prizadevanj, da se dvig povprečne globalne temperature „še bolj” omeji, in sicer na 1,5 °C v primerjavi s predindustrijsko ravnjo.
The Paris Agreement does not introduce binding emission reduction targets for the signatory parties; instead, it imposes nationally determined contributions to the overall goal to limit the increase in global temperature. 
S Pariškim sporazum se za podpisnice ne uvajajo zavezujoči cilji glede zmanjšanja emisij, temveč so v njem opredeljeni nacionalno določeni prispevki k splošnemu cilju, da se omeji dvig globalne temperature.
These contributions include both the countries’ reductions in man-made emissions at their source and removals (“carbon sinks”) of greenhouse gases. 
Ti prispevki obsegajo zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki jih povzroči človek, pri viru, in odvzeme toplogrednih plinov („ponore ogljika”) v posameznih državah.
04 Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and thus to limit global warming, are helped by having accurate information about emission levels, trends, and the policies and measures aimed at improving them. 
04 K prizadevanjem za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov in s tem za omejitev globalnega segrevanja pripomorejo točne informacije o ravneh in trendih emisij ter politikah in ukrepih za njihovo izboljšanje.
This requires a sound framework for monitoring and reporting on greenhouse gas emissions, as well as reliable information on projected changes in emissions resulting from existing and planned policies and measures. 6 
Za to so potrebni trden okvir za spremljanje emisij toplogrednih plinov in njihovo sporočanje ter zanesljive informacije o napovedanih spremembah pri emisijah, ki so posledica obstoječih in načrtovanih politik in ukrepov. 6
05 Both the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement set out such frameworks. 
05 Kjotski protokol in tudi Pariški sporazum določata take okvire.
The Kyoto Protocol’s framework is valid until the reporting of emissions for 2020 (in 2022). 
Okvir Kjotskega protokola velja do sporočanja emisij za leto 2020 (leta 2022).
The Paris Agreement’s framework will first be used for the reporting of emissions for 2021 (to be published in 2023). 
Okvir Pariškega sporazuma se bo prvič uporabil za sporočanje emisij za leto 2021 (objava je predvidena v letu 2023).