natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the Romanian RDP, the situation is indeed different in the sense that only projects that contain renewable investments for own consumption were programmed to have a direct contribution to focus area 5C whereas other 5 measures, programmed under FA 2A, 3A, 6A and 6B were considered to have secondary effects on focus area 5C. 
Romunski program razvoja podeželja je drugačen, ker so samo projekti, ki vsebujejo naložbe v energijo iz obnovljivih virov za lastno porabo, načrtovani tako, da neposredno prispevajo k prednostnemu področju 5C, drugi ukrepi, načrtovani na prednostnih področjih FA 2A, 3A, 6A in 6B, pa imajo sekundarne učinke na prednostno področje 5C.
One example is small scale infrastructure, including investments in renewable energy and energy saving, considered to primarily foster local development in rural areas and therefore attributed to focus area 6B. 
Eden od primerov je infrastruktura manjšega obsega, vključno z naložbami v energijo iz obnovljivih virov in prihranki energije, za katero velja, da spodbuja predvsem lokalni razvoj na podeželskih območjih, zaradi česar je uvrščena na prednostno področje 6B.
While it is true that no specific output indicators for renewable energy projects existed at the beginning of the period 2007-2013, the CMEF 2007-2013 included an indicator referring explicitly to renewable energy production for programme evaluation. 
Čeprav je res, da v začetku obdobja 2007–2013 niso obstajali posebni kazalniki izložkov za projekte na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov, je skupen okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja za obdobje 2007–2013 zajemal kazalnik, ki se je nanašal izključno na proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov za vrednotenje programa.
Impact indicator n°7 Contribution to combating climate change was addressed through a measurement of an increase in production of renewable energy (quantitative and qualitative change in the production of renewable energy attributed to intervention funded by EAFRD). 
7 Prispevek k boju proti podnebnim spremembam je bil obravnavan z meritvijo povečanja proizvodnje energije iz obnovljivih virov (kvantitativna in kvalitativna sprememba v proizvodnji energije iz obnovljivih virov, pripisana posredovanju, ki ga financira EKSRP).
In the context of reporting on monitoring and indicators, the Commission provides guidance to help Member States to build capacities in addressing their monitoring obligations. 
Komisija v okviru poročanja o spremljanju in kazalnikih zagotavlja navodila, ki so državam članicam v pomoč pri krepitvi zmožnosti izpolnjevanja njihovih obveznosti spremljanja.
With regards to the data submitted by Member States, the Commission assesses its quality. 
Države članice predložijo podatke, Komisija pa oceni njihovo kakovost.
However, the reliability of such data is the responsibility of the Member States authorities. 
Za zanesljivost tovrstnih podatkov pa so odgovorni organi držav članic.
As projects serving the deployment of renewable energy are dispersed in different measures and no single output indicator existed before the Health Check, comprehensive information is difficult to attain. 
Celovite informacije je težko dobiti, saj so projekti za uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov razpršeni v različnih ukrepih, pred sistematskim pregledovanjem pa ni bilo enotnega kazalnika izložkov.
However, the impact indicator as referred to in reply to paragraph 61 provides for some information on the possible effectiveness of the support for investments in renewable energy. 
Kljub temu pa kazalnik učinka, naveden v odgovoru na odstavek 61, zagotavlja nekaj informacij o morebitni učinkovitosti podpore za naložbe v energijo iz obnovljivih virov.
Considering that renewable energy was introduced as a new challenge only in the Health Check when the programmes had already started, the renewable energy-related information in ex-ante evaluations used for the design of the RDPs was limited. 
Glede na to, da je bila energija iz obnovljivih virov kot nov izziv uvedena šele s sistematskim pregledovanjem, ko so se programi že začeli izvajati, so bile informacije v zvezi z energijo iz obnovljivih virov v predhodnih vrednotenjih, ki so bile uporabljene za oblikovanje programov razvoja podeželja, omejene.
In the ex-post evaluations all Member States/Regions had to answer a particular evaluation question directly linked to renewable energy. 
V naknadnih vrednotenjih so morale vse države članice/regije odgovoriti na posamezno vprašanje glede vrednotenja, ki je bilo neposredno povezano z energijo iz obnovljivih virov.
The Commission provided guidance (which is not binding). 
Komisija je zagotovila navodila (ki niso zavezujoča).
However, the content of ex-posts evaluations depends on the content of a particular RDP which reflects the policy choices made by Member States. 
Vendar pa je vsebina naknadnih vrednotenj odvisna od vsebine posameznega programa razvoja podeželja, ki odraža politične odločitve držav članic.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 68 and 69: Within the framework of Rural Development Programs, expected results and corresponding targets are established at the level of objectives (i.e. focus areas) and not at the level of individual measures. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 68 in 69: 6 V okviru programov razvoja podeželja so pričakovani rezultati in ustrezni cilji določeni na ravni ciljev (tj. prednostnih področij) in ne na ravni posameznih ukrepov.
Effectiveness and efficiency of Rural Development Programmes will be assessed through extended evaluations for which CMES indicators only represent a tool and will be complemented by other information. 
Uspešnost in učinkovitost programov razvoja podeželja bosta ocenjeni na podlagi razširjenih vrednotenj, kazalniki sistema CMES pa bodo le orodje, ki ga bodo dopolnjevale druge informacije.
The definition of common indicators had to be done by taking into account issues of data availability in all Member States, cost-effectiveness of the system and acceptable administrative burden for the Member States. 
Skupne kazalnike je bilo treba opredeliti ob upoštevanju vprašanj razpoložljivosti podatkov v vseh državah članicah, stroškovne učinkovitosti sistema in sprejemljivega upravnega bremena za države članice.
Although not always corresponding to the definition of “result” indicators, the Commission considers that additional programme-specific indicators can be helpful to assess the programmes. 
Čeprav dodatni kazalniki za posamezne programe ne ustrezajo vedno opredelitvi kazalnikov „rezultatov“, Komisija meni, da so lahko v pomoč pri oceni programov.
The Commission guidelines "Assessment of RDP results: how to prepare for reporting on evaluation in 2017" suggest in Annex 11 (p. 
V smernicah Komisije z naslovom „Assessment of RDP results: how to prepare for reporting on evaluation in 2017“ (Ocena rezultatov programa razvoja podeželja: kako se pripraviti na poročanje o vrednotenju v letu 2017) iz priloge 11 (str.
76) various data sources such as: beneficiaries' application forms and payment requests, national/regional statistics, energy supply and control entities data, Eurostat – energy statistics. 
76) so predlagani različni viri podatkov, na primer: prijavni obrazci upravičencev in njihovi zahtevki za plačilo, nacionalni/regionalni statistični podatki, podatki o dobavi energije in nadzornih subjektih ter statistični podatki Eurostata o energiji.
"Surveys/focus groups" are also cited as one possible data source – at the last place of a long list of other possible above-mentioned data sources (https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/evaluation/publications/guidelines-assessment-rdp-results-how-prepare-reporting-evaluation-2017_en). 
Na koncu dolgega seznama zgoraj navedenih možnih virov podatkov so navedene tudi „ankete/ciljne skupine“ (https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/evaluation/publications/guidelines-assessment-rdp-results-how-prepare-reporting-evaluation-2017_en).
Please note also that the Commissions guidelines are non-binding documents. 
Opozoriti je treba, da smernice Komisije niso zavezujoči dokumenti.
Their goal is to improve the quality and comparability of the evaluations which are under the responsibility of the Member States. 
Njihov cilj je izboljšati kakovost in primerljivost vrednotenj, za katera so odgovorne države članice.
In the framework on Rural Development Programmes, several measures can work to achieve the results of a given objective. 
V okviru programov za razvoj podeželja je mogoče rezultate posameznega cilja doseči z več ukrepi.
Such results can only be assessed through evaluations. 
Te rezultate je mogoče oceniti samo z vrednotenji.
The Commission acknowledges the risk of administrative burden created by this but aims to strike an appropriate balance between costs and benefits. 
Komisija priznava tveganje upravnega bremena, ki ga to povzroča, vendar si prizadeva vzpostaviti primerno ravnovesje med stroški in koristmi.
As to the alleged lack of comparability due to programme specificities, e.g. additional programme-specific indicators, an individual evaluation of a RDP still assesses impacts and results of this same programme and serves as examples for other RDPs, which may not even have the respective measures. 
V zvezi z domnevnim pomanjkanjem primerljivosti zaradi posebnosti programov, npr. dodatnih kazalnikov za posamezne programe, posamezno vrednotenje programa razvoja podeželja vseeno podaja oceno učinkov in rezultatov tega programa in je primer za druge programe razvoja podeželja, v katere zadevni ukrepi morda sploh niso vključeni.
Under rural development, different activities contribute to improved deployment of renewable energy, of which investments in renewable energy production or mobilisation of forest biomass for the energy purposes represent only two. 
Različne dejavnosti v okviru razvoja podeželja prispevajo k izboljšani uporabi energije iz obnovljivih virov; naložbe v proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov ali mobilizacija gozdne biomase za energijo sta le dve od njih.
The EAFRD also supports renewable energy projects through local development strategies supported by LEADER. 
EKSRP podpira tudi projekte na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov na podlagi lokalnih razvojni strategij, ki so podprte v okviru programa LEADER.
Such community-led local development initiatives typically provide benefits in terms of increased local acceptance and ensure renewable energy projects are embedded in a broader strategy for the sustainable development of the local area in question. 
Te pobude za razvoj, ki jih vodi skupnost, so običajno bolje sprejete v lokalni skupnosti in zagotavljajo vključenost projektov na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov v širšo strategijo za trajnostni razvoj zadevnega lokalnega območja.
The role of selection criteria is to prioritise projects according to the ranking of objectives of the programme as a whole, based on needs and potential identified. 
Vloga izbirnih meril je prednostno razvrščanje projektov v skladu z razvrstitvijo ciljev programa kot celote glede na opredeljene potrebe in potencial.
In line with shared management, Member States set the selection criteria for each measure and consults the RDP Monitoring Committee (where all relevant stakeholders are represented in line with the partnership principle). 
V skladu z načelom deljenega upravljanja države članice določijo izbirna merila za vsak ukrep in se posvetujejo z odborom za spremljanje programa razvoja podeželja (v katerem so v skladu z načelom partnerstva zastopane vse zadevne zainteresirane strani).
The Commission participates in these Monitoring Committees, providing guidance and feedback. 
Komisija sodeluje v teh odborih za spremljanje, kjer zagotavlja navodila in povratne informacije.
This feedback may also include clear indication that the thresholds are considered to be too low. 
V povratnih informacijah lahko tudi jasno navede, da so pragovi prenizki.
This has been for example the case for the French RDP visited by the ECA. 
To se je na primer zgodilo v primeru francoskega programa razvoja podeželja, ki ga je pregledalo Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Box 10 – Renewable energy projects with marginal benefits for rural development Based on the lessons learnt in the 2007-2013 programming period, in the current programming period the Bulgarian RDP supports investments in renewable energy production for own consumption only (on the farm or in the enterprise). 
Okvir 10 – Projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov z obrobnimi koristmi za razvoj podeželja 7 Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih v programskem obdobju 2007–2013, bolgarski program razvoja podeželja v trenutnem programskem obdobju podpira samo naložbe v proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov za lastno porabo (na kmetijah ali v podjetjih).
Member States are generally encouraged to choose projects for support under EAFRD providing a significant contribution to rural development. 
Države članice se načeloma spodbuja, da se odločijo podpreti tiste projekte v okviru EKSRP, ki bistveno prispevajo k razvoju podeželja.
However, when assessing the benefits for rural development in comparison to renewable energy projects funded by other support schemes, the scope of such projects under EAFRD has to be taken into account. 
Vendar pa je treba pri ocenjevanju koristi za razvoj podeželja v primerjavi s projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov, ki jih financirajo druge podporne sheme, upoštevati obseg takšnih projektov v okviru EKSRP.
The number of jobs created as well as other business opportunities and services provided have to be seen within that context. 
V tem okviru je treba razumeti število ustvarjenih delovnih mest ter drugih poslovnih priložnosti in storitev.
The Commission agrees that renewable energy projects have a potential to contribute to sustainable rural development, in particular through inclusion of local stakeholders. 
Komisija se strinja, da lahko projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov prispevajo k trajnostnemu razvoju podeželja, zlasti z vključitvijo lokalnih zainteresiranih strani.
However, whether the potential of EAFRD funding in this respect is realised remains the choice of the Member States/Regions when designing their rural development programmes and striking the balance between various objectives of their rural development strategies. 
Vendar pa je uresničitev potenciala financiranja EKSRP v tem smislu odvisna od izbire držav članic/regij pri oblikovanju programov razvoja podeželja in vzpostavljanju ravnovesja med različnimi cilji strategij razvoja podeželja.
The Renewable Energy Directive is a general legal framework for promoting the deployment of renewable energy across the EU and the achievement of the 2020 renewable energy targets. 
Direktiva o energiji iz obnovljivih virov je splošen pravni okvir, ki spodbuja uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov po vsej EU in doseganje ciljev glede energije iz obnovljivih virov do leta 2020.
Although rural development is an important driver for renewable energy deployment, the Directive itself leaves significant freedom to Member States on how to achieve their national renewable energy targets, including how to promote renewable energy deployment in rural areas. The 7 
Čeprav je razvoj podeželja pomembno gonilo uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, direktiva državam članicam pušča veliko svobode pri izbiri načina za doseganje njihovih nacionalnih ciljev glede energije iz obnovljivih virov, vključno s tem, kako bodo spodbujale uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov na podeželskih območjih.
Commission proposal for a recast of the Renewable Energy Directive addresses the emerging models of renewable energy consumption and renewable energy communities, which can further support rural development benefits of renewable energies. 
Predlog Komisije za prenovitev direktive o energiji iz obnovljivih virov obravnava nastajajoče modele porabe energije iz obnovljivih virov in skupnosti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov, ki lahko še dodatno povečajo koristi energije iz obnovljivih virov za razvoj podeželja.
Recommendation 1 – Rural proofing of future renewable energy policy First alinea: The Commission accepts this recommendation in so far it concerns the Commission action. 
Priporočilo 1 – Preverjanje prihodnje politike za energijo iz obnovljivih virov z vidika njenega učinka na podeželje Prva alinea: Komisija sprejema to priporočilo, vkolikor se nanaša na ukrepanje Komisije.
When drafting their integrated national energy and climate plans required under the Governance Regulation – currently in co-decision – Member States could take into account, inter alia, the circumstances and needs of their rural areas. 
Države članice bi lahko pri pripravi osnutkov celovitih nacionalnih energetskih in podnebnih načrtov, ki se zahtevajo z uredbo o upravljanju, ki je trenutno v postopku soodločanja, med drugim upoštevale tudi okoliščine in potrebe svojih podeželskih območij.
Second alinea: A reference to rural proofing is included in the Commission Communication on the Future of Food and Farming (see page 22 of COM(2017) 713 final). 
Druga alinea: Navedba preverjanja vplivov na podeželska območja je vključena v sporočilo Komisije o prihodnosti preskrbe s hrano in kmetijstva (glej stran 22 COM(2017) 713 final).
Third alinea: The recommendation is accepted in so far that the Commission proposal for Regulation on the Energy Union Governance – currently in co-decision – already provides for an interactive dialogue with Member States with the view to assess whether the targets, objectives and contributions included in their national energy and climate plans are sufficient for the collective achievement of the Energy Union objectives. 
Tretja alinea: Komisija sprejema to priporočilo, saj njen predlog glede uredbe o upravljanju energetske unije, ki je trenutno v postopku soodločanja, že določa interaktiven dialog z državami članicami, da bi presodila, ali cilji in prispevki, vključeni v njihove nacionalne energetske in podnebne načrte, zadoščajo za skupno uresničevanje ciljev energetske unije.
Modelling carried out for the Impact Assessment on bioenergy sustainability point out to the fact that while biomass imports are projected to increase, the supply of biomass for energy will continue to be sourced mostly domestically. 
Iz modeliranja, izvedenega za oceno učinka trajnostne rabe bioenergije, je razvidno, da čeprav se pričakuje, da se bo uvoz biomase povečal, bo biomasa za energijo še naprej večinoma domačega izvora.
According to the Commission's own modelling for a 2020-2030 perspective, demand of biomass for heat and power is projected to peak in 2025 and decline slightly afterwards by 2030, as a result of competition from other renewables and the effects of energy efficiency in buildings. 
Iz lastnega modeliranja Komisije za obdobje 2020–2030 je razvidno, da bo povpraševanje po biomasi za ogrevanje in električno energijo vrhunec predvidoma doseglo leta 2025, zatem pa 8 rahlo upadalo do leta 2030 zaradi konkurence drugih obnovljivih virov in učinkov energetske učinkovitosti v stavbah.
In a longer term perspective (2050), biofuel demand is projected to increase significantly due to the need to decarbonize the transport sector, including aviation. 
Na daljši rok (do leta 2050) se bo povpraševanje po biogorivu predvidoma močno povečalo zaradi potrebe po razogljičenju v prometnem sektorju, vključno z letalstvom.
Furthermore, the Commission believes the proposal for a recast of the Renewable Energy Directive reinforces the EU bioenergy sustainability framework, thereby providing sufficient safeguards to ensure that biomass for energy is sustainably produced and used. 
Poleg tega Komisija meni, da predlog za prenovitev direktive o energiji iz obnovljivih virov krepi okvir EU za trajnostno rabo bioenergije, s čimer v zadostni meri zagotavlja trajnostno proizvodnjo in uporabo biomase za energijo.
Recommendation 2 – Improved bioenergy sustainability framework The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 2 – Izboljšan okvir za trajnostno rabo bioenergije Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
In the Commission's view, the proposal for a recast of the Renewable Energy Directive, now in co-decision, will, once adopted, reinforce the EU bioenergy sustainability framework, thereby providing sufficient safeguards to ensure that biomass for energy is sustainably produced and efficiently used. 
Po mnenju Komisije bo predlog za prenovitev direktive o energiji iz obnovljivih virov, ki je trenutno v postopku soodločanja, po sprejetju okrepil okvir EU za trajnostno rabo bioenergije, s čimer v zadostni meri zagotavlja trajnostno proizvodnjo in uporabo biomase za energijo.
In addition, the Commission proposal for a Regulation to integrate greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use-change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework (LULUCF Regulation) – currently in co-decision (with a provisional agreement reached by the co-legislators on 14 December 2017) – aims to ensure that emissions or removals for biomass for energy are accounted at national level by Member States and that the "no debit rule" applies for LULUCF. 
Poleg tega je cilj predloga Komisije glede uredbe o vključitvi emisij toplogrednih plinov in odvzemov zaradi rabe zemljišč, spremembe rabe zemljišč in gozdarstva v okvir podnebne in energetske politike do leta 2030 (uredba LULUCF), ki je trenutno v postopku soodločanja (sozakonodajalca sta začasni sporazum dosegla 14. decembra 2017), zagotoviti, da države članice na nacionalni ravni obračunavajo emisije ali odvzeme za biomaso za energijo in da se „pravilo o nepresežku emisij“ uporablja za LULUCF.
Moreover, the Common Agricultural Policy, currently, includes provisions for the protection of soil organic carbon in cropland and grassland. 
Poleg tega skupna kmetijska politika trenutno vključuje določbe za zaščito organskega ogljika v tleh kmetijskih zemljišč in travinja.
As outlined in the Communication on Future of Food and Farming, the Commission seeks to strengthen the CAP's ambition regarding resource efficiency, environmental care and climate action. 
Kot je navedeno v sporočilu o prihodnosti preskrbe s hrano in kmetijstva, si Komisija prizadeva okrepiti ambicije SKP glede učinkovite rabe virov, skrbi za okolje in podnebnih ukrepov.
During the negotiations of the Partnership Agreements and relevant programmes the Commission has actively promoted the establishment of synergies and complementarities in the use of the European Structural and Investment Funds while taking also into account existing national or other EU funding schemes. 
Komisija je med pogajanji o partnerskih sporazumih in zadevnih programih dejavno spodbujala uvedbo sinergij in dopolnjevanja pri uporabi evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov, pri čemer je upoštevala tudi obstoječe nacionalne in druge programe financiranja EU.
However; implementation choices fall under the responsibility of the Member States. 
Za odločitve glede izvajanja pa so odgovorne države članice.
In the case of projects for renewable energy, EAFRD can very well be the adequate support mechanism for local projects, thus complementing other existing funding. 
V primeru projektov na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov je lahko EKSRP ustrezen podporni mehanizem za lokalne projekte in tako dopolnjuje druge obstoječe vire financiranja.
They will furthermore address potential beneficiaries in rural areas not eligible under other funds. 
Poleg tega se bodo dodatno obravnavali potencialni upravičenci na podeželskih območjih, ki niso upravičeni v okviru drugih skladov.
Within the strategic programming approach Member States can chose which focus area they consider most adequate for programming a specific measure in line with the objective of the measure. 
Države članice lahko v okviru pristopa strateškega načrtovanja izberejo prednostno področje, ki se jim zdi najprimernejše za načrtovanje posameznega ukrepa v skladu s ciljem ukrepa.
It is a logical consequence that renewable energy projects thus appear under different focus areas. 
Logična posledica je, da lahko projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov spadajo na različna prednostna področja.