natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, for the sampled Member States, checks were carried out on whether the recommendations were specific, measurable and achievable. 
Zlasti so bili za države članice v vzorcu izve‐ deni pregledi tega, ali so bila priporo‐ čila specifična, merljiva in dosegljiva.
52 INDIC/07/13052014/EN — Monitoring the Youth Guarantee — Revised Working Group note for the IG meeting on 13 May 2014. 
52 INDIC/07/13052014/ EN – Spremljanje jamstva za mlade – spremenjen dopis delovne skupine za medvladno srečanje 13. maja 2014.
53 Council of the European Union: ‘Implementation of the Youth Guarantee and monitoring framework — endorsement of the EMCO’s key messages’, 17 November 2014. 
53 Svet Evropske unije, Izvajanje jamstva za mlade in okvir za spremljanje – potrditev ključnih sporočil Odbora za zaposlovanje, 17. novembra 2014.
Observations 31 Commission scoreboard on Youth unemployment and NEETs indicators Youth unemployment and NEETs indicators are part of a newly developed Commission scoreboard of key em‐ ployment and social indicators which identifies the major employment and social imbalances within the EU. 
Opažanja 31 Pregled stanja glede brezposelnosti mladih in kazalnikov NEET, ki ga pripravi Komisija Brezposelnost mladih in kazalniki NEET so del novega pregleda stanja, ki ga opravi Komisija in zajema ključne zaposlitvene in socialne kazalnike. S pregledom stanja se ugotavljajo glavna zaposlitvena in socialna nerav‐ notežja v EU.
The first such Scoreboard was published as part of the Joint Employment Report 2014, jointly adopted by the Commission and the EU’s Council of Ministers. 
Prvi takšen pregled je bil objavljen kot del skupnega poročila o zaposlovanju za leto 2014, ki sta ga skupaj sprejela Komisija in Svet ministrov EU.
It is composed of five key indicators and forms the basis of the Commission’s proposals for structural reforms. 
Sestavlja ga pet ključnih kazalnikov in je podlaga za predloge Komisije za strukturne reforme.
75 The Court found that the 2013 CSRs related to youth unemployment were in general neither specific nor measur‐ able (see Box 7). 
75 Sodišče je ugotovilo, da priporočila za posamezne države za leto 2013, ki so se nanašala na brezposelnost mladih, na splošno niso bila niti specifična niti merljiva (glej okvir 7).
76 In 2014, the Commission proposed specific recommendations on the implementation of the Youth Guar‐ antee to eight countries (Bulgaria, Ireland, Spain, Italy, Croatia, Poland, Portugal and Slovakia). 
76 Leta 2014 je Komisija predlagala po‐ sebna priporočila o izvajanju jamstva za mlade osmim državam (Španija, Italija, Slovaška, Hrvaška, Portugalska, Poljska, Bolgarija in Irska).
The Court found that these CSRs provided more detail and some of them also included milestones. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so ta priporočila za posa‐ mezne države vsebovala več podrob‐ nosti, nekatera pa tudi mejnike.
77 The effective implementation of CSRs depends, however, on political com‐ mitment at national level. 
77 Vendar pa je uspešno izvajanje pripo‐ ročil za posamezne države odvisno od politične zavezanosti na nacionalni ravni.
According to the Commission only 10 % of all 2013 CSRs have been fully imple‐ mented while 45 % have seen limited or no progress54. 
Komisija navaja, da je bilo v ce‐ loti izvedenih le 10 % vseh priporočil za posamezne države za leto 2013, pri 45 % pa je bil napredek omejen ali pa ga ni bilo54.
This was also ad‐ dressed by the European Parliament in October 201455. 
To je oktobra 2014 obrav‐ naval tudi Evropski parlament55.
78 The Court notes that in relation to the CSRs addressing the Youth Guaran‐ tee, considerable reforms are needed which are unlikely to be implemented in the short term. 
78 Sodišče ugotavlja, da so glede priporo‐ čil za posamezne države, ki se nana‐ šajo na jamstvo za mlade, potrebne velike reforme, za katere ni verjetno, da jih bo mogoče izvesti kratkoročno.
54 Commission website: Country‐Specific Recommendations 2013 (http://ec.europa.eu). 
54 Spletna stran Komisije, Priporočila za posamezne države 2013 (http://ec.europa.eu).
55 European Parliament resolution of 22 October 2014 on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities (2014/2059(INI)). 
55 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. oktobra 2014 o evropskem semestru za usklajevanje gospodarskih politik: izvajanje prednostnih nalog za leto 2014 (2014/2059(INI)).
Country‐specific recommendations in 2013 — Examples of Lithuania and Italy The CSR for Lithuania was to ‘Improve the employability of young people, for example through a Youth Guar‐ antee, enhance the implementation and effectiveness of apprenticeships schemes, and address persistent skills mismatches’; for Italy it was to: ‘Take further action to foster labour market participation, especially of women and young people, for example through a Youth Guarantee’. 
Priporočila za posamezne države za leto 2013: primera Litve in Italije V priporočilu za posamezno državo za Litvo je bilo navedeno, naj izboljša zaposljivost mladih, na primer z jamstvom za mlade, okrepi izvajanje in uspešnost vajeniških programov in obravnava vztrajna neskladja znanja in spretnosti s potrebami na trgu dela. Za Italijo je bilo izrečeno priporočilo, naj nadalje ukrepa za spodbuja‐ nje udeležbe na trgu dela, zlasti žensk in mladih, na primer z jamstvom za mlade.
Both CSRs made reference to the Youth Guarantee scheme, but neither provided details on how the countries should implement the schemes to have most impact; nor did either provide any measurable targets, or interim milestones. 
Obe priporočili sta omenili program jamstva za mlade, nobeno pa ni zagotovilo podrobnosti o tem, kako naj državi izvajata program, da bo imel največji učinek. Prav tako nista zagotovili merljivih ciljev ali vmesnih mejnikov.
Box 7 Box 6 
Okvir 7 Okvir 6
Observations 32 No plans for systematic reporting on the Youth Guarantee schemes as a whole The new performance framework for ESF/YEI focuses on results 81 ESF/YEI‐funded Youth Guarantee ac‐ tions are to be monitored according to the legal framework of the Euro‐ pean Structural and Investment Funds57. 
Opažanja 32 Ni načrtov za sistematično poročanje o programih jamstva za mlade kot celoti Novi okvir uspešnosti ESS/PZM se osredotoča na rezultate 81 Spremljanje ukrepov jamstva za mlade, financiranih iz ESS/PZM, poteka v okvi‐ ru pravnega okvira evropskih struktur‐ nih in investicijskih skladov57.
The ESF regulation contains specific provisions for monitoring, reporting and evaluating the YEI to ensure that its impacts and contribu‐ tion to the Youth Guarantee can be measured and made visible. 
Uredba o ESS vsebuje posebne določbe za spremljanje, poročanje in vrednotenje PZM, da se zagotovi, da je mogoče izmeriti njene učinke in prispevek k jamstvu za mlade ter jih narediti pre‐ poznavne.
In par‐ ticular, it requires that ‘At least twice during the programming period, an evaluation shall assess the effective‐ ness, efficiency and impact of joint support from the ESF and the specific allocation for YEI including for the im‐ plementation of the Youth Guarantee. 
Zlasti zahteva: „Vsaj dvakrat v programskem obdobju se z vredno‐ tenjem oceni uspešnost, učinkovitost in učinek skupne podpore iz ESS in posebnih sredstev za pobudo za zapo‐ slovanje mladih in izvajanje jamstva za mlade.
The first evaluation shall be completed by 31 December 2015 and the second evaluation by 31 December 2018’58. 82 In addition, as from April 2015 and for subsequent years, the Member States must send structured data related to common indicators to the Commission for EU‐supported actions togeth‐ er with the annual implementation reports (AIRs). 
Prvo vrednotenje bo zaključeno do 31. decembra 2015, drugo vredno‐ tenje pa do 31. decembra 2018.”58 82 Poleg tega morajo države članice od aprila 2015 in za naslednja leta Komisiji skupaj z letnimi poročili o izvajanju po‐ šiljati strukturirane podatke o skupnih kazalnikih za ukrepe, ki jih podpira EU.
These reports must also set out and assess the quality of employment offers received by partic‐ ipants as well as their progress in con‐ tinuing education, finding sustainable and decent jobs, or moving into ap‐ prenticeships or quality traineeships59. 
V teh poročilih mora biti tudi predsta‐ vljena in ocenjena kakovost ponudb za zaposlitev, ki jih prejmejo udeleženci, ter njihov napredek pri nadaljevanju izobraževanja, iskanju trajnostnega in dostojnega delovnega mesta ali pri prehodu v vajeništvo ali kakovostno pripravništvo59.
56 Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
56 Člen 53 Uredbe (EU) št.
57 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013. 
1303/2013 in Uredba (EU) št. 1304/2013.
58 Article 19(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013. 
58 Člen 19(6) Uredbe (EU) št.
59 Article 19(3) and 19(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013. 
59 Člen 19(3) in 19(4) Uredbe (EU) št.
79 The CPR regulation requires the Com‐ mission to send a summary report of the annual implementation reports (AIRs) to the European Parliament each year, starting from 2016. 
79 Uredba o skupnih določbah zahteva, da Komisija od leta 2016 vsako leto pošlje zbirno poročilo, pripravljeno na podlagi letnih poročil o izvajanju, Evropskemu parlamentu.
Moreover, in 2017 and 2019, the Commission is to present to the European Parliament strategic reports summarising the progress reports of the Member States and attend the Parliament’s debate on those reports56. 
Poleg tega mora v letih 2017 in 2019 Evropskemu parlamentu predstaviti strateško po‐ ročilo, v katerem bo povzela poročila o napredku držav članic, in se udeležiti razprave Evropskega parlamenta o teh poročilih56.
80 The Court notes that Youth Guarantee measures that are not funded through the ESF/YEI OPs would not be included in these reports since the AIRs cover only EU‐funded interventions. 
80 Sodišče ugotavlja, da ukrepi v okviru jamstva za mlade, ki niso financirani iz operativnih programov ESS/PZM, ne bi bili vključeni v ta poročila, saj letna poročila o izvajanju zajemajo samo posredovanja, ki jih financira EU.
As a re‐ sult, with the exception of the EMCO indicators, there is no provision for any reporting on the nationally funded part of the Youth Guarantee scheme at EU level. 
Po‐ sledično ni razen kazalnikov Odbora za zaposlovanje nobene določbe za poro‐ čanje o nacionalno financiranem delu programa jamstva za mlade na ravni EU.
This carries the risk that stake‐ holders will not have a clear overview of how and to what extent the Youth Guarantee as a whole contributes to tackling youth unemployment. 
Zato obstaja tveganje, da deležniki ne bodo imeli jasnega pregleda nad tem, kako in v kakšni meri jamstvo za mlade kot celota prispeva k boju proti brezposelnosti mladih.
Observations 33 83 The ESF regulation provides for man‐ datory common output and results indicators for all actions supported by an operational programme (OP)60. For the OP activating the YEI it also requires that Member States detail specific result indicators. 
Opažanja 33 83 – Uredba o ESS določa obvezne skupne kazalnike izložkov in rezultatov za vse ukrepe, ki jih podpira operativni program60. Za operativni program, pri katerem se aktivira PZM, zahteva tudi, da države članice natančno določijo posebne kazalnike rezultatov.
84 The Court has examined the relevance of the YEI result indicators as set out in the ESF regulation and identified that the following result indicators could be more detailed when approving future ESF/YEI OPs or when making amendments to existing OPs: — the YEI‐specific results indicators ‘Unemployed/Long‐term unem‐ ployed/Inactive participants who receive an offer of employment, continued education, apprentice‐ ship or traineeship upon leaving’ does not require Member States to provide data which differentiate between the four different offers which participants can receive un‐ der the Youth Guarantee scheme. 
84 Sodišče je preučilo ustreznost kazalni‐ kov rezultatov za PZM, kot so določeni v uredbi o ESS. Ugotovilo je, da bi bili lahko pri odobritvi prihodnjih ope‐ rativnih programov ESS/PZM ali pri spremembah obstoječih operativnih programov podrobneje določeni nas‐ lednji kazalniki rezultatov: – pri posebnem kazalniku rezultatov za PZM, „brezposelni/dolgotrajno brezposelni/neaktivni udeleženci, ki ob odhodu prejmejo ponudbo za zaposlitev, nadaljnje izobraže‐ vanje, vajeništvo ali pripravništvo”, se od držav članic ne zahteva, da zagotovijo podatke, ki razlikujejo med štirimi različnimi ponudbami, ki jih lahko udeleženci prejmejo v okviru programa jamstva za mlade.
The absence of such a require‐ ment means that details will not be available on the types of Youth Guarantee offers taken up by young people and consequently whether corrective actions will be necessary to improve the effective‐ ness of the measures; — the YEI longer‐term result in‐ dicators measure the situation of young people just 6 months after the intervention has ended, whereas measuring over a longer time lag would facilitate drawing conclusions on the sustainability of certain offers (e.g. job offer); — the regulation allows Member States to extend, on a voluntary basis, the YEI target group to peo‐ ple over 25 but under the age of 30. 
Ker te zahteve ni, ne bodo na voljo podrobnosti o tem, katere vrste ponudb v okviru jamstva za mlade so mladi sprejeli, in posledično tudi ne o tem, ali bo treba uspešnost ukrepov izboljšati s popravljalnimi ukrepi; – dolgoročnejši kazalniki rezultatov za PZM merijo položaj mladih samo šest mesecev po posredova‐ nju. Merjenje z daljšim časovnim zamikom bi olajšalo sprejemanje zaključkov o trajnosti nekaterih po‐ nudb (npr. ponudbe za zaposlitev); uredba omogoča državam čla‐ nicam, da lahko na prostovoljni podlagi razširijo ciljno skupino PZM na osebe nad 25 let, vendar pod 30 let.
However, none of the YEI result indicators cover the 25–29 age group, making it difficult to assess the effectiveness of measures for this age group. 
Vseeno pa noben kazal‐ nik rezultatov za PZM ne pokriva starostne skupine 25–29 let, zato je težko oceniti uspešnost ukrepov zanjo.
While the Commis‐ sion guidance strongly encourages Member States to develop their own output indicators (such as participants in YEI‐funded actions) for the 25–29 age group, it makes no reference to the related result indicators. 
Čeprav smernice Komisije močno spodbujajo države članice, naj razvijajo lastne kazalnike izlož‐ kov (kot so udeleženci ukrepov, financiranih iz PZM) za starostno skupino 25–29 let, pa ne omenjajo s tem povezanih kazalnikov re‐ zultatov.
The Court found that of the four Member States examined which chose to extend the YEI scope (France, Italy, Lithuania and Portugal), none has established ad‐ ditional programme‐specific result indicators, and two (France and Portugal) have not even set the ad‐ ditional output indicators to cover the extended target group. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da nobena od štirih pregledanih držav članic, ki so se odločile za razširitev obsega PZM (Francija, Italija, Litva in Portugalska), ni določila dodatnih kazalnikov rezultatov za posamezne programe, dve (Francija in Portugal‐ ska) pa nista določili niti dodatnih kazalnikov izložkov, da bi zajeli razširjeno ciljno skupino.
60 Annex II of Regulation (EU) 1304/2013. 
60 Priloga II k Uredbi (EU) št. 1304/2013.
Conclusions and 34 recommendations 85 The Youth Guarantee recommenda‐ tion was formally adopted by the EU’s Council of Ministers on 22 April 2013 on the basis of a proposal made by the Commission in December 2012. 
Zaključki in priporočila 34 85 Priporočilo o jamstvu za mlade je uradno sprejel Svet ministrov EU 22. aprila 2013 na podlagi predloga Komisije iz decembra 2012.
This recommendation made specific recommendations to both Member States and the Commission for the implementation of the scheme. 
V njem so bila navede‐ na posebna priporočila državam člani‐ cam in Komisiji o izvajanju programa.
In par‐ ticular, the Commission was entrusted with assessing the available Member States’ Youth Guarantee implementa‐ tion plans so that feedback could be provided to Member States during the European Semester bilateral meetings. 
Komisiji je bila zlasti zaupana naloga ocenjevanja razpoložljivih izvedbenih načrtov za jamstvo za mlade, ki so jih pripravile države članice, da bi bilo mogoče državam članicam na dvo‐ stranskih srečanjih v okviru evrop‐ skega semestra zagotoviti povratne informacije.
The Commission provided adequate and timely support to the Member States in setting up the Youth Guarantee scheme 86 Overall, the Court concludes that the Commission provided adequate and timely support to the Member States in the process of setting up the Youth Guarantee. 
Komisija je zagotovila ustrezno in pravočasno podporo državam članicam pri vzpostavljanju programa jamstva za mlade 86 Splošni zaključek Sodišča je, da je Komisija zagotovila ustrezno in pravo‐ časno podporo državam članicam pri vzpostavljanju jamstva za mlade.
In particular, the Commis‐ sion issued guidance on designing Youth Guarantee schemes in Septem‐ ber 2013, i.e. only 5 months after the adoption of the Council recommenda‐ tions in April 2013 (paragraphs 29 to 31). 
Pred‐ vsem je septembra 2013 izdala smer‐ nice o oblikovanju programov jamstva za mlade, torej samo pet mesecev po sprejetju priporočil Sveta aprila 2013 (glej odstavke 29 do 31).
87 The Commission carried out a com‐ prehensive and timely assessment of the draft YGIPs submitted by Member States and successfully identified several shortcomings. 
87 Komisija je pripravila celovito in pravo‐ časno oceno osnutkov INJM, ki so jih predložile države članice, in uspešno ugotovila več pomanjkljivosti.
However, the Commission did not thoroughly and consistently assess the following as‐ pects: ICT/digital skills, mutual obliga‐ tion and mutual learning. 
Vendar pa ni temeljito in dosledno ocenjevala naslednjih vidikov: znanja in spretnosti s področja IKT in digitalnega področja, vzajemne obveznosti in vzajemnega učenja.
The Court also found that not all Member States submitted an updated YGIP following the Commission’s assessment (para‐ graphs 32 to 39). 
Sodišče je tudi ugotovilo, da nekatere države članice niso predložile posodobljenega INJM, zatem ko ga je ocenila Komisija (odstavki 32 do 39).
Risks to an effective implementation of the Youth Guarantee schemes have been identified by the Court 88 Based on the Court’s review of the Commission’s assessment of the Youth Guarantee implementation plans, a number of risks have been identified relating to the adequacy of the total funding and the nature of a ‘good quality offer’, as well as monitoring and reporting arrangements for the Youth Guarantee scheme. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tveganje za uspešno izvajanje programov jamstva za mlade 88 Sodišče je na podlagi pregleda oce‐ ne, ki jo je za izvedbene načrte za jamstvo za mlade pripravila Komisija, ugotovilo številna tveganja v zvezi z zadostnostjo skupnega financiranja in tem, kaj je kakovostna ponudba, pa tudi z ureditvami za spremljanje in po‐ ročanje za program jamstva za mlade.
Adequacy of total funding for the Youth Guarantee scheme 89 The Court considers that, in the ab‐ sence of an impact assessment by the Commission, there is insufficient infor‐ mation on the potential cost of imple‐ menting a Youth Guarantee scheme in the EU Member States. 
Zadostnost skupnega financiranja programa jamstva za mlade 89 Sodišče meni, da glede na to, da Komisija ni pripravila ocene učinka, ni dovolj informacij o morebitnih stroških izvajanja programa jamstva za mlade v državah članicah EU.
Moreover, at the time of the audit, the Commis‐ sion did not have a detailed picture of the EU and national funding amounts allocated by the Member States to the different measures of the Youth Guarantee scheme, and in particular to measures related to structural reforms. 
Poleg tega si do časa revizije Komisija ni ustvarila podrobne slike o zneskih financiranja EU in zneskih nacionalnega financi‐ ranja, ki so jih države članice dodelile za različne ukrepe programa jamstva za mlade, še posebno za ukrepe, povezane s strukturnimi reformami.
The Court considers that due to the lack of such information there is a risk that total funding may not be ade‐ quate to implement the Youth Guaran‐ tee scheme (paragraphs 45 to 57). 
Sodišče meni, da zaradi pomanjkanja teh informacij obstaja tveganje, da skupno financiranje ne bo zadostno za izvedbo programa jamstva za mlade (odstavki 45 do 57).
Conclusions and recommendations 35 Recommendation 1 Member States should provide a clear and complete overview of the cost of all planned measures to combat youth unemployment under the Youth Guarantee Scheme in order that the Commission can assess the overall funding needs. 
Zaključki in priporočila 35 Priporočilo 1 Države članice naj zagotovijo jasen in popoln pregled stroškov vseh načr‐ tovanih ukrepov za boj proti brezpo‐ selnosti mladih v okviru programa jamstva za mlade, da lahko Komisija oceni skupne potrebe po financiranju.
Nature of a ‘good quality offer’ 90 The ‘good quality’ nature of offers, a factor highlighted in the definition of what constitutes a Youth Guarantee, is crucial for providing young people with a genuine opportunity to increase their employability with a view to sus‐ tainable and rewarding labour market integration, and consequently boost‐ ing overall youth employment rates. 
Kaj je kakovostna ponudba 90 Kakovost ponudb je dejavnik, ki je v opredelitvi jamstva za mlade pou‐ darjen in je bistven za to, da se mla‐ dim ponudi resnična priložnost za povečanje njihove zaposljivosti zaradi trajnostne in koristne vključitve na trg dela in posledično povečanja splošnih stopenj zaposlenosti mladih.
The absence of a set of qualitative attributes for a job offer to be consid‐ ered as being of ‘good quality’ entails the risk of inconsistent and ineffective implementation of Youth Guarantee schemes across (and even within) Member States (paragraphs 58 to 64). 
Ker ni sklopa kvalitativnih značilnosti za to, kaj je kakovostna ponudba za zaposli‐ tev, obstaja tveganje, da bo izvajanje programov jamstva za mlade nedo‐ sledno in neuspešno med državami članicami (ali celo znotraj posamezne države članice) (odstavki 58 do 64).
Recommendation 2 The Commission should promote a set of qualitative attributes that should be fulfilled for jobs, traineeships and apprenticeships to be supported from the EU budget. 
Priporočilo 2 Komisija naj spodbuja sklop kvalitativ‐ nih značilnosti, ki jih morajo delovna mesta, pripravništva in vajeništva imeti, da se zanje izplača podpora iz proračuna EU.
This could be based on the elements which define a good quality offer in the Commission Guid‐ ance for evaluation of the YEI. 
Ta bi lahko temeljil na elementih, s katerimi je v smernicah Komisije za vrednotenje PZM oprede‐ ljena kakovostna ponudba.
Monitoring of the Youth Guarantee schemes 91 The Court found that a comprehen‐ sive Youth Guarantee monitoring and reporting framework is still being developed. 
Spremljanje programov jamstva za mlade 91 Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je celovit okvir za spremljanje in poročanje za jamstvo za mlade še vedno v razvoju.
To have a clear picture of the implementation of the Youth Guar‐ antee Scheme as a whole, all measures should be monitored to ensure that funds are invested wisely and measures are implemented in ways that will make a real difference for young peo‐ ple. 
Da bi si bilo mogoče ustvariti jasno sliko o izvajanju programa jamstva za mlade kot celote, bi bilo treba vse uk‐ repe spremljati, da se zagotovi, da so sredstva pametno investirana, ukrepi pa izvedeni na način, ki bo prinesel resnične spremembe za mlade.
This should also make it possible to react proactively when it becomes clear that targets will not be met. 
To bi moralo omogočiti tudi proaktiven odziv, kadar se izkaže, da cilji ne bodo doseženi.
This information should be reported in a way that allows the success (or oth‐ erwise) of the Youth Guarantee to be demonstrated (paragraphs 65 to 84). 
Te informacije bi bilo treba sporočati na način, ki bi omogočil, da se dokaže uspeh (ali neuspeh) jamstva za mlade (odstavki 65 do 84).