natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of these two databases, therefore, there was no automatic system for following up ÔlostŐ animals. 
Tako za ti dve podatkovni bazi ni obstajal samodejni sistem spremljanja „izgubljenih“ živali.
On 1 January 2002, the Italian database contained 2 305 076 ÔlostŐ animals. 
1. januarja 2002 je bilo v italijanski podatkovni bazi 2 305 076 „izgubljenih“ živali.
These were animals that had been reported as live ÔexitsŐ by one keeper but were not registered as ÔentriesŐ by another keeper. 
Šlo je živali, ki jih je določen imetnik prijavil za živ „izstop“, medtem ko drugi imetnik ni prijavil njihovega vstopa.
The causes of this situation were either absence of notification and notification errors, or recording errors and miscellaneous computer errors. 
Vzroki za tako stanje so lahko neprijavljanje ali napake pri prijavljanju oziroma napake pri beleženju ali druge računalniške napake.
In Great Britain, the same type of situation had led the authorities to set up a Ôlong dead programmeŐ which made it possible to eliminate anomalies relating to animals which must be considered dead. 
V Veliki Britaniji so organi zaradi enakega položaja vzpostavili „long dead programme“, ki je omogočal odpravo nepravilnosti v zvezi z živalmi, za katere se je domnevalo, da so mrtve.
Where an animal was registered with two keepers at the same time, the German and British systems generated an anomaly on the first day of the overlap. The French system generated an anomaly if the overlap lasted 15 days and the Italian system made no provision for this anomaly. 
Kadar je bila žival zabeležena pri dveh imetnikih hkrati, sta nemški in britanski sistem nepravilnosti javila prvi dan prekrivanja, medtem ko je francoski sistem javil nepravilnosti, kadar je prekrivanje trajalo 15 dni, italijanski sistem pa te nepravilnosti sploh ni predvidel.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/19 51. 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 29/19 51.
The Member States had developed few quality indicators for the national databases. 
Države članice za nacionalne podatkovne baze niso razvile veliko kazalcev kakovosti.
In addition, management charts were either non-existent or under development. 
Poleg tega niso obstajali nobeni diagrami vodenja ali pa so se šele razvijali.
The absence of a defined compatible format for exchanging data between national databases prevents complete traceability in respect of cattle moving from one Member State to another. 
Ker format za izmenjavo primerljivih podatkov med nacionalnimi podatkovnimi bazami ni opredeljen, to onemogoča popolno sledljivost goved, ki potujejo iz ene države članice v drugo.
Compliance with reporting deadlines is vital to efficient tracing in real time. 
Upoštevanje rokov za prijave je bistveno za učinkovito sledljivost v realnem času.
The Member States are not obliged to analyse these data, or to forward them to the Commission. 
Državam članicam teh podatkov ni treba analizirati in jih pošiljati Komisiji.
Analysis of the information sent to the Court revealed substantial disparities in reporting times between types of movements and between Member States (see diagram 4). 
Analiza informacij, poslanih Sodišču, je pokazala velike razlike med roki za prijave vrste premikov in med državami članicami (glej prikaz 4).
Diagram 4 Percentage of movement reports subject to delay in 2001 (delays of more than seven days after the event) Source: National databases. 
Prikaz 4 Odstotek prijav o premikih, oddanih z zamudo leta 2001 (zamuda več kot 7 dni glede na dogodek) Nemčija Francija Italija Združenokraljestvo (Velika Britanija) Skotitve Vstopi (nakupi, začasni vstop itd.)
The data for France do not permit identification of entries from other Member States. 
Za Francijo iz podatkov ni mogoče razbrati, kateri vstopi prihajajo iz druge države članice.
C 29/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 54. 
C 29/20 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.2.2005 54.
For example, Great Britain asked the Commission for assistance during the design phase of its system, but it was refused. 
Tako je Velika Britanija pri oblikovanju svojega sistema Komisijo prosila za pomoč, vendar je ta to zavrnila.
Absence of criteria for recognition of the fully operational character of databases 55. 
Ni kriterijev za priznanje popolnoma operativnega značaja podatkovnih baz 55.
The Commission issues an opinion (1) on the fully operational character of the national databases before a Member State abolishes passports for movements of cattle on its national territory (see paragraph 26). 
Komisija izda mnenje (1) o popolnoma operativnem značaju nacionalnih podatkovnih baz, preden država članica odpravi potne liste za premike goveda na svojem nacionalnem ozemlju (glej odstavek 26).
The Commission bases this recognition that the databases are fully operational on an analysis of Member StatesŐ replies to a questionnaire and a two-day on-the-spot visit to the Member States making the request. 
Komisija pri tem priznanju popolnoma operativnega značaja podatkovnih baz izhaja iz analize odgovorov držav članic na vprašalnik in dvodnevnega obiska na kraju samem v državah članicah, ki so to zahtevale.
The object of this visit is a presentation of the database in operation. 
Namen tega obiska je predstaviti delovanje podatkovne baze.
The Commission then publishes its decision recognising the national database to be fully operational. 
Komisija nato objavi svojo odločitev, v kateri prizna popolnoma operativni značaj nacionalne podatkovne baze.
Box 6 The Commission has very often laid down conditions with which the Member State must comply, to ensure that its database is entirely reliable. 
6 Komisija je zelo pogosto določila pogoje, ki jih mora država članica izpolnjevati za popolno zanesljivost njene podatkovne baze.
When the Luxembourg database was recognised as fully operational, the Commission brought to light, among other things, two weaknesses, namely that the competent authority was unable to correct errors or omissions rapidly and that the time allowed for reporting movements, births and deaths was more than seven days. 
Komisija je med postopkom priznavanja luksemburške podatkovne baze opozorila zlasti na dve pomanjkljivosti, in sicer pristojni organ ni bil sposoben hitro popraviti napak ali vrzeli, rok za prijavo premikov, skotitev in poginov pa je bil daljši od sedmih dni.
In the case of Denmark, the Commission drew attention to the same two weaknesses. 
Za Dansko je Komisija opozorila na isti pomanjkljivosti.
In addition, passports were not authenticated and there was no reporting of premium status. 
Poleg tega potni listi niso bili potrjeni, poročalo pa se ni o nobenem statusu premij.
In Belgium, not all types of movement were recorded in the database and the competent authority was unable to correct errors or omissions rapidly. 
V Belgiji v podatkovno bazo niso bile vnešene vse vrste premikov in pristojni organ ni bil sposoben hitro popraviti napak ali vrzeli.
In the Netherlands, the competent authority was unable to correct errors or omissions rapidly, the time allowed for reporting movements, births and deaths was more than seven days and the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2630/97 were not applied correctly. 
Na Nizozemskem pristojni organ ni bil sposoben hitro popraviti napak ali vrzeli, rok za prijavo premikov, skotitev in poginov je bil daljši od sedmih dni in določbe Uredbe (ES) št.
In Austria, not all animal movements were registered, there were delays in corrections of errors and national legislation on deadlines for reporting movements was not complied with. 
V Avstriji niso bili zabeleženi vsi premiki živali, napake so se popravljale z zamudo in nacionalna zakonodaja v zvezi z roki za prijavo premikov se ni upoštevala.
In Sweden, neither slaughterings nor movements to knackersŐ yards were reported. 
Na Švedskem niso bili zabeleženi niti zakoli niti premiki v obrate za zbiranje živalskih trupel.
There were delays in correcting errors and not all provisions concerning new identification of cattle in case of loss of ear tags were complied with. 
Napake so se popravljale z zamudami in niso se upoštevale vse določbe v zvezi z novo identifikacijo goveda pri izgubi ušesnih znamk.
The deadlines for reporting movements were not complied with. 
Upoštevali se niso roki za prijavo premikov.
In Northern Ireland, the authorities were advised to take the necessary measures to improve the reliability of data recording, to improve procedures relating to the replacement of ear tags, especially the deadlines for distribution and traceability. 
Na Severnem Irskem se je organom svetovalo, naj sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za izboljšanje zanesljivosti beleženja podatkov in izboljšanje postopkov, povezanih z zamenjavo ušesnih znamk, zlasti rokov za razdelitev in sledljivosti.
They were also to improve the procedures for authentification and validation of passports. 
Izboljšati so morali tudi postopke za priznanja in odobritve potnih listov.
In France, the authorities were recommended to reduce the time allowed for reporting movements, births and deaths to seven days, to record all animal movements and to correct rapidly any error or omission discovered during on-the-spot checks. 
V Franciji se je organom svetovalo, naj rok za prijavo premikov, skotitev in poginov skrajšajo na sedem dni, zabeležijo vse premike živali in hitro popravijo vsako napako ali vrzel, ugotovljeno med kontrolami na kraju samem.
The conditions entered in the CommissionŐs decisions recognising the fully operational character of the databases and the findings of the Food and Veterinary Office and the Directorate-General for Agriculture concerning cattle identification and registration did not guarantee that the system in place allowed the conditions required by the legislation to be verified, in respect of reporting deadlines, the absence of reports, or penalties. 
Pogoji, ki jih je Komisija navedla v svojih odločitvah, s katerimi priznava popolnoma operativen značaj podatkovnih baz, in ugotovitve Urada za prehrano in veterinarstvo ter Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo v zvezi z identifikacijo in registracijo goveda niso zagotavljali, da bi vzpostavljeni sistem lahko omogočal preverjanje zakonsko določenih pogojev v zvezi z roki za prijavo, neprijavljanjem ali kaznimi.
The sole purpose of the decision to recognise the fully operational character of a database was to confirm that the database was fully operational in the technical sense. 
Edini cilj odločitve, s katero se prizna popolnoma operativen značaj podatkovne baze, je bil priznati, da je bila ta baza popolnoma operativna v tehničnem smislu.
According to the Commission, this recognition is limited to approving the design of the system set up by a Member State. 
Po mnenju Komisije je to omejeno zgolj na potrditev oblikovanja sistema, ki ga je vzpostavila država članica.
Furthermore, the Commission has not applied precise management rules or predefined quality indicators as to the basis for its evaluation of the actual operation of the databases. 
Poleg tega Komisija delovanja v ožjem pomenu besede ni ocenila na podlagi natančnih upravljavskih pravil ali vnaprej določenih kazalcev kakovosti.
The practical operation and ultimate reliability of the database thus depend on the keepers who are to input complete data and update the base rapidly. 
Praktično delovanje in končna zanesljivost podatkovne baze sta odvisna od imetnikov, ki morajo vanjo vnašati izčrpne podatke in jo hitro posodabljati.
In addition, all decisions recognising databases to be fully operational contain conditions with suspensive effect linked to a formal commitment by the Member States concerned to make a certain number of improvements to the operation of the databases before the date on which formal recognition comes into effect. 
Poleg tega imajo odločitve, s katerimi se prizna operativni značaj, odložilne učinke, povezane z uradno zavezanostjo zadevnih držav članic, da pred začetkom uradnega priznanja vzpostavijo določeno število ukrepov za boljše delovanje podatkovnih baz.
Since 2001, the Commission has undertaken to monitor, systematically, whether the recommendations issued have actually been implemented. 
Od leta 2001 je Komisija zavezana, da sistematično spremlja učinkovito izvajanje izdanih priporočil.
Since 2001, the Food and Veterinary Office has carried out various audit missions concerning traceability, and the findings are taken into account in the evaluation of the design and functioning of the databases. 
Od leta 2001 je Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo izvedel različne kontrolne misije v zvezi s sledljivostjo, katerih rezultate je treba upoštevati pri ocenjevanju oblikovanja in delovanja podatkovnih baz.
Although this approach has been adopted, it was not applied at the time of the first evaluations of the operational character of the databases. 
Čeprav je bil ta ukrep sprejet, ni bil uporabljen med prvimi ocenami operativnega značaja podatkovnih baz.
These in-depth checks are now used as a basis for evaluating whether the databases are operational. 
Podrobni pregledi se tako uporabljajo kot podlaga za oceno operativnega značaja podatkovnih baz.
For this reason the Commission is attaching greater importance to the database recognition procedure and to the role it can play in this field. 
Zato Komisija večjo pozornost posveča postopku priznavanja podatkovnih baz in vlogi, ki jo lahko ima.
At the beginning of 2004, the databases of nine Member States and that of Northern Ireland had been recognised by the Commission, on the dates shown in table 5. 
Na začetku leta 2004 je Komisija podatkovne baze devetih držav članic in Severne Irske priznala v rokih, navedenih v tabeli 5.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/21 Table 5 Dates of Commission decisions recognising the fully operational character of databases Member State (or region) Decision 1999/317/EC 1999/375/EC 1999/376/EC 1999/377/EC 1999/546/EC 1999/571/EC 1999/693/EC 1999/696/EC France Germany 2002/67/EC Date of decision Finland Actual date of recognition 1 May 1999 1 August 1999 1 October 1999 1 July 1999 1 October 1999 1 October 1999 1 November 1999 1 November 1999 2 September 2001 Not specified 62. the draft recognition decision has been suspended by the Commission. 
4.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 29/21 Tabela 5 Datumi odločb Komisije o priznanju popolnoma operativnega značaja podatkovnih baz Država članica (ali regija) Odločba 1999/317/ES 1999/375/ES 1999/376/ES 1999/377/ES 1999/546/ES 1999/571/ES 1999/693/ES 1999/696/ES Francija Nemčija 2002/67/ES Datum Odločbe 28. april 1999 19. maj 1999 19. maj 1999 19. maj 1999 13. julij 1999 28. julij 1999 5. oktober 1999 11. oktober 1999 7. maj 2001 28. januar 2002 62. ljestvo) so službe Komisije začasno preklicale osnutek odločitve o priznanju.
These delays in the decision process are prejudicial to the Member States concerned. 
Te zamude pri postopku sprejemanja odločitev neugodno vplivajo na zadevne države članice.
Moreover, two Member States (Spain and Ireland) granted themselves the benefits of recognition in the absence of any formal decision on the part of the Commission by reducing their rates of checks from 10 to 5 %. 
Poleg tega sta si dve državi članici (Španija in Irska) sami dodelili ugodnosti priznavanja brez uradne odločitve Komisije, tako da sta svojo raven kontrole znižali z 10 na 5 %.
The United Kingdom set up two separate databases, i.e. one in Great Britain and one in Northern Ireland (1). 
Združeno kraljestvo je vzpostavilo dve ločeni podatkovni bazi, in sicer eno v Veliki Britaniji in drugo na Severnem Irskem (1).
The two bases are incompatible, as evidenced by the failure of the work of cross-checking animal movements in the two databases. The work was carried out by the competent authority at the CourtŐs request. 
Ti podatkovni bazi nista združljivi, kot dokazuje neizvajanje navzkrižnega preverjanja premikov goveda med obema podatkovnima bazama; to delo je namreč opravil pristojni organ na zahtevo Sodišča.
The data available do not provide an audit trail for animals traded between Northern Ireland and Great Britain. 
Razpoložljivi podatki ne omogočajo spremljanja živali, s katerimi se trguje med Severno Irsko in Veliko Bri-tanijo.
In addition, vets were using a different database and this was not in line with the objectives of the legislation (2). 
Poleg tega so veterinarji uporabljali drugo podatkovno bazo, kar ni bilo v skladu s cilji Uredbe (2).
Luxembourg Denmark Belgium Netherlands Austria Sweden United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) 5 11 28 April 1999 19 May 1999 19 May 1999 19 May 1999 13 July 1999 28 July 1999 October 1999 October 1999 2001/399/EC 7 May 2001 28 January 2002 61. 
Finska Dejanski datum priznanja 1. maj 1999 1. avgust 1999 1. oktober 1999 1. julij 1999 1. oktober 1999 1. oktober 1999 1. november 1999 1. november 1999 2. september 2001 Ni natančno opredeljen Luksemburg Danska Belgija Nizozemska Avstrija Švedska Združeno kraljestvo (Severna Irska) 2001/399/ES 61.
The databases of six Member States had still not been recognised at the beginning of 2004. 
Podatkovne baze šestih držav članic na začetku leta 2004 še niso bile priznane.
These were Greece, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and the United Kingdom (Great Britain). 
Gre za Grčijo, Španijo, Irsko, Italijo, Portugalsko in Združeno kraljestvo (Veliko Britanijo).
The situation is set out in detail in box 7. 
Stanje je podrobno opisano v okvirčku št. 7.
Box 7 In the case of Portugal, the Commission has suspended the draft recognition decision as from the date of their visit on 19 October 2000, because of the weaknesses found during the visit by DG SANCO inspectors. 
7 V Portugalski so službe Komisije začasno preklicale osnutek odločitve o priznanju po datumu njihovega obiska 19. oktobra 2000 zaradi pomanjkljivosti, ki so jih na kraju samem ugotovili inšpektorji Generalnega direktorata za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov.
The Spanish authorities returned the CommissionŐs questionnaire on 24 July 2001. 
Španske oblasti so Komisiji vprašalnik vrnile 24. julija 2001.
They claimed they were ready for the CommissionŐs visit in connection with the official recognition of their database, but asked that the date on which recognition took effect should be the date on which the questionnaire was sent to the Commission. 
Po-trdile so, da so pripravljene na obisk Komisije v zvezi z uradnim pri-znanjem podatkovne baze, vendar so želele, da bi bil datum dejanskega priznanja datum, ko se je vprašalnik poslal Komisiji.
Since 2002, the rate of on-the-spot checks has been reduced to 5 %. 
Od leta 2002 naprej se je raven kontrol na kraju samem zmanjšala na 5 %.
The Commission visited Great Britain on 20 and 21 November 2001. 
Komisija je Veliko Britanijo obiskala 20. in 21. novembra 2001.
A draft decision was drawn up proposing 1 April 2002 as the date on which the decision should come into effect, but here, too, the Commission has suspended the decision because of weaknesses found during an inspection. 
Pripravil se je osnutek odločitve, ki je predlagal 1. april 2002 kot datum začetka veljavnosti te odločitve, vendar so službe Komisije tudi tukaj odločitev začasno preklicale zaradi pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih med kontrolami na kraju samem.
In a letter of 23 January 2002, the Irish authorities simply informed the Commission that their database was fully operational and for this reason they were reducing the rate of on-the-spot checks from 10 to 5 %. 
Irske oblasti so s pismom z dne 23. januarja 2002 Komisijo preprosto obvestile, da je njihova podatkovna baza popolnoma operativna in da bodo zaradi tega raven kontrol na kraju samem znižale z 10 na 5 %.
As far as Italy is concerned, the Commission received the completed standard questionnaire on 28 February 2002. 
Komisija je izpolnjen standardni vprašalnik Italije prejela 28. februarja 2002.
The Italian authorities said that they were ready to receive the CommissionŐs visit for official recognition of their database. 
Italijanske oblasti so potrdile, da so pripravljene sprejeti obisk Komisije za uradno priznanje podatkovne baze.
In a letter of 24 July 2001, the Greek authorities informed the Commission about their plans for setting up the database, which was scheduled to become operational in June 2002. 
Grške oblasti so s pismom z dne 24. julija 2001 Komisijo obvestile o svojih načrtih za vzpostavitev podatkovne baze, ki naj bi se začela uporabljati junija 2002.
C 29/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 64. 
C 29/22 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.2.2005 64.
The Commission recognised the database for Northern Ireland as fully operational as from 1 November 1999. 
Komisija je priznala, da je podatkovna baza Severne Irske popolnoma operativna na dan 1. novembra 1999.
The setting-up of two separate databases in the United Kingdom and the individual recognition of one of them by the Commission is not in conformity with Community legislation. 
Vzpostavitev dveh ločenih podatkovnih baz v Združenem kraljestvu in dejstvo, da je Komisija priznala samo eno od njiju, ni v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
The incompatibility of the two databases means that they cannot be treated as a single database for operational purposes. 
Nezdružljivost obeh podatkovnih baz ne omogoča, da bi se lahko iz operativnega vidika združili v enotno bazo.
Supervision by the Commission 65. 
Nadzor s strani Komisije 65.
Until 1999 responsibility for identification and registration lay with DG Agriculture. 
Do leta 1999 je bil za identifikacijo in registracijo pristojen Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo.
Since then, the responsibility has been transferred to the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection (1). 
Od tega datuma naprej so se te pristojnosti prenesle na Generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov (1).
Nevertheless, it is DG Agriculture (IACS) which is responsible for control and payment of animal premiums. 
Vendar pa je za nadzor in izplačila živalskih premij pristojen Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo (IAKS).
Since 1999 it has only been possible for animal premiums for cattle to be paid if the cattle in question have been correctly identified and registered in the Community system (2). 
Od leta 1999 naprej se lahko živalske premije izplačajo samo za goveda, ki so bila ustrezno identificirana in registrirana v okviru sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda (2).
These two Directorates-General are therefore required to supervise the Community identification and registration system. The IACS legislation, like the legislation on the identification system, allows Member States to reduce the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks from 10 to 5 % when the national database is fully operational and has allowed effective cross-checks to be carried out within the IACS framework for more than one year (3). 
Zakonodaja o sistemu identifikacije in registracije goveda, kakor tudi o integriranem administrativnem in kontrolnem sistemu, državam članicam omogoča, da najmanjšo raven kontrol na kraju samem znižajo z 10 na 5 %, kadar je nacionalna podatkovna baza popolnoma operativna in več kot eno leto omogoča izvedbo učinkovitih navzkrižnih preverjanj v okviru sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda (3).
Health and Consumer Protection DG is in charge of the procedure for recognising the fully operational character of the national databases (see paragraphs 55 to 62) and is also responsible for monitoring the statistics of on-the-spot identification and registration checks which Member States are required to draw up (see paragraph 46). 
Generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov je zadolžen za postopek priznavanja popolnoma operativnega značaja nacionalnih podatkovnih baz (glej odstavke 55–62) ter spremljanje statistike o kontrolah na kraju samem v okviru sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda, ki jih morajo izdelati države članice (glej odstavek 46).
The Food and Veterinary Office is part of Health and Consumer Protection DG and is responsible for routine monitoring of the identification and registration system. 
Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo, ki je del Generalnega direktorata za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov, zagotavlja redno spremljanje sistema identifikacije in registracije goveda.