natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, the Member State informed the Commission that current plans provide for the installation of a new composting plant to meet the needs of the region. 
Poleg tega je država članica obvestila Komisijo, da obstoječi načrti predvidevajo namestitev nove kom-postarne, da bi se zadovoljile potrebe regije.
For the second case, in spite of the increase of the capacity of the plant, there is a higher production of waste. 
V drugem primeru pa se je kljub večji zmogljivosti objekta povečala proizvodnja odpadkov.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 26. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE 26.
The sustainability of the action co-financed by the EU is a crucial principle of the EU assistance. 
Trajnost ukrepa, ki ga sofinancira EU, je ključno načelo pomoči EU.
Member States have to guarantee that the projects are operable, functional and comply with EU policies: — In the context of closure of ERDF programmes, Member States are required to submit to the Commission, together with the closure documents, a list of unfinished and non-operational projects and have up to 2 years (31 December 2012) to submit information about completion of these projects. 
Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da so projekti delujoči, funkcionalni in skladni s politikami EU: — V okviru zaključevanja programov ESRR morajo države članice skupaj z dokumenti o zaključku Komisiji predložiti seznam nedokončanih in nedelujočih projektov, pri čemer morajo v največ dveh letih (31. december 2012) predložiti informacije o dokončanju teh projektov.
If, by then, projects are still not completed then the Commission will ensure that the Member State recover the funds concerned or will apply financial corrections. — In the case of the Cohesion Fund, the closure process requires reporting on the investment in the final report which includes an initial assessment whether the results expected are likely to be achieved. 
Če projekti v navedenem roku še vedno niso dokončani, Komisija zagotovi, da država članica povrne zadevna sredstva, ali uvede finančne popravke. — V primeru Kohezijskega sklada postopek zaključitve zahteva poročanje o naložbi v končno poročilo, ki vključuje začetno oceno v zvezi s tem, ali bodo pričakovani rezultati doseženi.
For a period of 3 years after the final payment by the Commission, the Member State authorities responsible have to provide all supporting documents regarding expenditure and checks on the project. 
Pristojni organi države članice morajo predložiti vso podporno dokumentacijo v zvezi z odhodki in preverjanji projekta za obdobje treh let po končnem plačilu Komisije.
The project located in Puglia is in the list of unfinished/ non-operational projects. 
Projekt iz Apulije je naveden na seznamu nedokončanih/ nedelujočih projektov.
Moreover, following a Commission request for information, the managing authority of the operational programme for Puglia 2000–06 informed the Commission services on 7 March 2012 that the contract for the operation of the project IT-PU4 had in the meantime been awarded and entered into force on 20 July 2012. 
Poleg tega je organ upravljanja operativnega programa za Apulijo v obdobju 2000–2006 na podlagi zahtevka Komisije za informacije 7. marca 2012 obvestil službe Komisije, da je bilo medtem oddano naročilo za izvajanje projekta IT-PU4, ki je začelo veljati 20. julija 2012.
27. (b) According to the Member State, the objectives of the project did not include the production of compost but of stabilised waste or off-specification compost (waste). 
27. (b) Po navedbah države članice cilji projekta niso vključevali proizvodnje komposta, ampak proizvodnjo stabiliziranih odpadkov ali komposta (odpadkov), ki ne ustreza specifikaciji.
In view of the structure of the plant, the project could not be authorised to produce quality compost (secondary raw material) on an industrial scale but only in an experimental capacity as was the case at the time of the Court’s on-the-spot inspection. 
Kar zadeva strukturo objekta, projekta ni bilo mogoče pooblastiti za proizvodnjo kakovostnega komposta (sekundarnih surovin) v industrijskem obsegu, ampak le na ravni eksperimenta, kot ob inšpekcijskem pregledu na kraju samem, ki ga je opravilo Sodišče.
Consequently, the waste produced is not expected to satisfy Italian legal requirements for fertilisers. 
Zato ni pričakovati, da bodo proizvedeni odpadki izpolnjevali italijanske zakonske zahteve glede gnojil.
4 This communication concludes that ‘standards for compost and digestate should be established to enable their free circulation on the internal market and to allow using them without further monitoring and control of the soils on which they are used’ (p. 
4 To sporočilo vključuje sklepno ugotovitev, da bi bilo treba uvesti „standarde za kompost in pregnito blato, da bi se omogočila njun prost pretok na notranjem trgu in njuna uporaba brez nadaljnjega spremljanja in nadzora tal, na katerih se uporabljata“ (str.
The ‘end of waste’ procedure under the waste framework directive could be the most efficient way of setting such standards. 
Postopek „prenehanja statusa odpadka“ iz okvirne direktive o odpadkih bi lahko bil najučinkovitejši način določitve teh standardov.
The Commission is starting work to assess the technical basis for a possible proposal. 
Komisija začenja z delom za oceno tehnične podlage morebitnega predloga.
Standards for compost are being elaborated in the context of end-of-waste criteria (technical drafts being prepared to be adopted, if appropriate, in the course of 2013). 
Standardi za kompost se pripravljajo na podlagi meril za prenehanje statusa odpadka (pripravljajo se tehnični osnutki, ki bodo sprejeti tekom leta 2013, če je ustrezno).
For more information on recent developments please see http://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/ waste/index.html. 
Več informacij o najnovejšem razvoju je na voljo na naslovu: http://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/waste/index.html.
Special Report No 20/2012 – Is structural measures funding for municipal waste management infrastructure projects effective in helping Member States achieve EU waste policy objectives? 59 Box 4 — First paragraph The Commission services take note of the Court's observation for the four plants, and will consider it during closure procedures when verifying the information provided by the Member States (see also reply to Observation 26). 
20/2012 – Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki? 59 Okvir 4, prvi odstavek Službe Komisije so seznanjene z opažanji Sodišča v zvezi s štirimi objekti in jih bodo upoštevale pri postopkih zaključevanja projekta med preverjanjem informacij, ki so jih predložile države članice (glej tudi odgovor na opažanje 26).
Box 4 — Third paragraph Regarding the sorting and composing plant of Linares in Spain, the Member State indicated as a reply to the Court observation that the low accomplishments of the targets was inter alia due to technical issues caused by hydrological conditions. 
Okvir 4, tretji odstavek V zvezi s sortirnico in kompostarno v Linaresu v Španiji je država članica kot odgovor na opažanja Sodišča navedla, da je bilo neučinkovito doseganje ciljnih vrednosti med drugim posledica tehničnih težav zaradi hidroloških razmer.
The composting process had been stopped in order to build some works to control the hydrological conditions. 
Postopek kompostiranja je bil prekinjen, da bi se zgradile naprave za nadzor hidroloških razmer.
This fact has had also an impact on the quantity of waste that had to be landfilled. 
Ta dejavnik je vplival tudi na količino odpadkov, ki jih je bilo treba odložiti na odlagališče.
According to the Member State, works were undertaken to address these issues. 
Po navedbah države članice se ta vprašanja rešujejo.
The landfill biodegradable diversion targets are to be met at national level. 
Ciljne vrednosti za preusmerjanje biološko razgradljivih odpadkov z odlagališč je treba doseči na nacionalni ravni.
The first target was fixed from July 2006. 
Prva ciljna vrednost je bila določena julija 2006.
The Commission is currently investigating the implementation of the current landfill diversion targets and EU Pilot cases5 have been launched accordingly. 
Komisija trenutno preiskuje izvajanje sedanjih ciljnih vrednosti za preusmerjanje z odlagališč, pri čemer se v skladu s tem uvajajo primeri sistema EU Pilot5.
28. (a) For one landfill, without pre-treatment system, only 31% of the waste deposited contained organic matter. 
28. (a) Na enem odlagališču brez sistema predhodne obdelave je le 31 % odloženih odpadkov vsebovalo organske snovi.
Moreover, the ratio of population who had no access to separate collection of organic waste has decreased from 69 % to 35 % in 2010. 
Poleg tega se je delež prebivalcev, ki niso imeli dostopa do ločenega zbiranja organskih odpadkov, leta 2010 zmanjšal z 69 % na 35 %.
So the content of organic waste landfilled has been decreasing. 
Delež odloženih organskih odpadkov se torej zmanjšuje.
In any case, the Commission services take note of the Court’s observation and will consider it during the project’s closure procedure when verifying the information provided by the Member State (see also reply to Observation 26). 
Službe Komisije so v vsakem primeru seznanjene z opažanji Sodišča in jih bodo upoštevale pri postopkih zaključevanja projekta med preverjanjem informacij, ki so jih predložile države članice (glej tudi odgovor na opažanje 26).
5 The EU Pilot is a system for the exchange of information between the Commission and Member States aiming to find solutions to potential breaches of EU law without the need to start infringement proceedings. 
5 EU Pilot je sistem izmenjave informacij med Komisijo in državami članicami z namenom iskanja rešitev za morebitne kršitve prava EU, ne da bi bilo treba začeti postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 28. (b) For one landfill site, according to information from the Member State, the performance had been inter alia affected by hydrological conditions but works were undertaken to address these issues. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE 28. (b) Po navedbah države članice so na delovanje enega od odlagališč med drugim vplivale hidrološke razmere, vendar se te težave rešujejo.
For the other facility, the Commission understands from the Member State that the significant quantities of undifferentiated waste coming from outside the area affect the performance. 
V zvezi z drugim objektom je država članica Komisiji navedla, da na njegovo delovanje vplivajo velike količine nediferenciranih odpadkov z drugih območij.
The Commission refers to its reply to Observation 26 for the plant which was not yet in operation at the time of the audit. 
V zvezi z obrat§om, ki v času revizije še ni obratoval, se Komisija sklicuje na odgovor na opažanje 26.
Common reply to Observation 30 and Box 5 Note is taken of these findings. 
Skupni odgovor na opažanje 30 in okvir 5 Navedene ugotovitve se upoštevajo.
To the extent the relevant provisions of the landfill directive on landfill gas control have been violated, the Commission will investigate the matter with the Member States concerned through the EU Pilot scheme. 
Če so se zadevne določbe v zvezi z nadzorom odlagališčnega plina iz direktive o odlagališčih kršile, bo to Komisija preiskala v sodelovanju z zadevnimi državami članicami prek sistema EU Pilot.
For the Italian project mentioned in Box 5, the Commission services take note of the Court’s observation and will consider it during the project’s closure procedure when verifying the information provided by the Member State (see also reply to Observation 26). 
V zvezi s projektom v Italiji iz okvira 5 so službe Komisije seznanjene z opažanji Sodišča in jih bodo upoštevale pri postopkih zaključevanja projekta med preverjanjem informacij, ki so jih predložile države članice (glej tudi odgovor na opažanje 26).
With regard to the Romanian project mentioned in Box 5, the Commission notes that when assessing the documents submitted by the Romanian authorities in order to fulfil the specific conditions laid down in Article 8 of the Financing Memorandum, the environmental permit issued for the ISPA project by the national competent authority provided for ‘installations for collection and flare of landfill gas’ for the new landfill as well as for a monitoring programme on the ‘quantity and quality of the landfill gas on the representative sections of the landfill’. 
V zvezi s projektom v Romuniji iz okvira 5 Komisija ugotavlja, da je ob oceni dokumentov, ki so jih predložili romunski organi zaradi izpolnjevanja posebnih pogojev iz člena 8 finančnega memoranduma, okoljsko dovoljenje, ki ga je za projekt ISPA izdal nacionalni pristojni organ, predvide-valo „naprave za zbiranje in sežiganje odlagališčnega plina“ za novo odlagališče ter program spremljanja „količine in kakovosti odlagališčnega plina na reprezentativnih delih odlagališča“.
Special Report No 20/2012 – Is structural measures funding for municipal waste management infrastructure projects effective in helping Member States achieve EU waste policy objectives? 60 Common reply to Observations 31 and 32 The landfill directive does not provide for quantified limits for odour emissions to be respected, but it provides a general requirement6 whereby landfill operators are requested to minimise nuisances such as odours. 
20/2012 – Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki? 60 Skupni odgovor na opažanji 31 in 32 Direktiva o odlagališčih ne določa spoštovanja količinskih omejitev za emisije vonjav, temveč vključuje splošno zahtevo6, v skladu s katero morajo upravljavci odlagališč čim bolj zmanjšati škodljive vplive, kot so vonjave.
For one project, complementary equipment (several fans and a biological filter) was added to avoid odour problems, according to the relevant permit at national level. 
Pri enem projektu je bila v skladu z zadevnim dovoljenjem na nacionalni ravni dodana dodatna oprema (več ventilatorjev in biološki filter) za preprečevanje težav z vonjavami.
The Commission services take note of the Court’s observation and will consider it during project closure procedure when verifying the information provided by the Member State (see also reply to Observation 26). 
Službe Komisije so seznanjene z opažanji Sodišča in jih bodo upoštevale med postopkom zaključevanja projekta, in sicer pri preverjanju informacij, ki jih predloži država članica (glej tudi odgovor na opažanje 26).
Common reply to Observations 33 and 34 The Commission acknowledges that the issue concerning the closure and after-care costs is a systemic problem, in need of a global approach. The Commission will open discussions with Member States at technical level. 
Skupni odgovor na opažanji 33 in 34 Komisija priznava, da je vprašanje v zvezi s stroški za zapiranje odlagališč in njihovo upravljanje po zaprtju sistemska težava, pri kateri je potreben globalen pristop. Komisija bo začela razprave z državami članicami na tehnični ravni.
In the framework of cohesion policy, the 2007–13 application form for major projects required applicants to demonstrate that operating and maintenance costs including replacement costs will be covered over a given reference period to ensure sustainability of the project. 
V okviru kohezijske politike je obrazec za vlogo za velike projekte v obdobju 2007–2013 zaradi zagotovitve trajnosti projekta od vlagateljev zahteval, da dokažejo, da bodo stroški obratovanja in vzdrževanja, vključno s stroški zamenjave, v določenem referenčnem obdobju pokriti.
Residual value which can be defined as the virtual liquidation value must also be considered in the financial analysis of major projects. 
V finančni analizi velikih projektov je treba upoštevati tudi preostalo vrednost, ki se lahko opredeli kot navidezna likvidacijska vrednost.
The Commission services take note of the Court’s observation and will consider it during the project closure procedure when verifying the information provided by the Member State. 
Službe Komisije so seznanjene z opažanji Sodišča in jih bodo upoštevale med postopkom zaključevanja projekta, in sicer pri preverjanju informacij, ki jih predloži država članica.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Common reply to Observations 37 and 38 There is no legal reporting obligation at regional level: directives and their requirements, including targets, are addressed to the Member States. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Skupni odgovor na opažanji 37 in 38 Obveznost poročanja na regionalni ravni ni zakonsko določena: direktive in zahteve iz direktiv, vključno s ciljnimi vrednostmi, so naslovljene na države članice.
Member States have to report on progress on the achievement of the recycling and recovery targets for municipal waste under the 2008 waste framework directive at national level; reporting has started in 2012. 
Države članice morajo na nacionalni ravni poročati o napredku pri doseganju ciljnih vrednosti recikliranja in predelave za komunalne odpadke v skladu z okvirno direktivo o odpadkih iz leta 2008, pri čemer se je poročanje začelo leta 2012.
Nevertheless, the Commission has put in place the collection of regional municipal waste statistics at EU level as a new activity in 2010. 
Kljub temu je Komisija leta 2010 kot novo dejavnost uvedla zbiranje regionalnih statističnih podatkov o komunalnih odpadkih na ravni EU.
The Commission applies the quality framework as established for the production of annual municipal waste statistics, which are being produced since 1995. 
Komisija pri tem uporablja okvir za kakovost, kot je bil določen za pripravo letnih statističnih podatkov o komunalnih odpadkih, ki se zbirajo od leta 1995.
The data collections on municipal waste are provided by Member States on a voluntary basis in the frame of the Commission’s annual statistical work programme. 
Zbirke podatkov o komunalnih odpadkih prostovoljno zagotavljajo države članice v okviru letnega statističnega programa dela Komisije.
Member States should report regularly on the achievement of the targets set in waste stream-specific EU directives. 
Države članice naj redno poročajo o doseganju ciljnih vrednosti iz direktiv EU o tokovih odpadkov.
The Commission is continuously working on the improvement of data quality by producing guidance documents, training material and through the organisation of workshops with data producers from Member States. 
Komisija si stalno prizadeva za izboljšanje kakovosti podatkov, tako da pripravlja smernice in gradivo za usposabljanje ter organizira delavnice s pripravljavci podatkov iz držav članic.
Waste statistics and derived indicators are published on the Commission's website (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/waste). 
Statistični podatki o odpadkih in izpeljani kazalniki so objavljeni na spletni strani Komisije na naslovu: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/waste.
61 Common reply to Observations 40 and 41 The EU legislation applicable during the auditing period contains no legal requirement on separate collection. 
61 Skupni odgovor na opažanji 40 in 41 Zakonodaja EU, ki se je uporabljala v obdobju revizije, ne vsebuje zakonskih zahtev glede ločenega zbiranja.
The 2008 waste framework directive requires Member States to set up separate collection for at least paper, glass, metal and plastic by 2015. 
Okvirna direktiva o odpadkih iz leta 2008 od držav članic zahteva, da začnejo do leta 2015 ločeno zbirati vsaj papir, steklo, kovine in plastiko.
The legally binding waste hierarchy positions landfilling at the bottom of the waste management treatment options. In line with the ‘Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe’ (COM(2011) 571 final), by 2020 landfilling should be minimised to non-reusable and non-recyclable waste. 
Pravno zavezujoča hierarhija gospodarjenja z odpadki določa odlaganje odpadkov na odlagališča kot zadnjo možnost obdelave. V skladu s Časovnim okvirom za Evropo, gospodarno z viri (COM(2011) 571 final), je treba odlaganje odpadkov do leta 2020 omejiti na odpadke, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno uporabiti in reciklirati.
Finally, the landfill targets are established at national level and not at regional level. 
Nenazadnje so ciljne vrednosti v zvezi z odlagališči določene na nacionalni in ne na regionalni ravni.
As explained in the Court’s footnote, the relevant targets set in the EU waste legislation are national based. 
Kot je pojasnjeno v opombi Sodišča, so zadevne ciljne vrednosti iz zakonodaje EU na področju odpadkov določene na nacionalni ravni.
43. (b) The Commission has initiated infringement proceedings, inter alia, against the four Member States subject to the audit for the existence of illegal landfills in their territory. 
43. (b) Komisija je med drugim uvedla postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev zoper štiri države članice, ki so bile predmet revizije v zvezi z obstojem nezakonitih odlagališč na njihovih ozemljih.
The Commission initiates infringement proceedings whenever such illegal practices are established. 44. (a) At the time the projects were implemented, there was no EU legal requirement whereby biodegradable waste had to be collected separately. 
Komisija uvede postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev ob vsakem odkritju takih nezakonitih praks 44. (a) V času izvajanja projektov v EU ni bilo zakonske zahteve glede ločenega zbiranja biološko razgradljivih odpadkov.
Article 22 of the 2008 waste framework directive, encourages Member States to practice the separate collection of biowaste. However it is not a legal obligation. 
Člen 22 okvirne direktive o odpadkih iz leta 2008 spodbuja države članice k ločenemu zbiranju bioloških odpadkov, vendar to ni pravna obveznost.
Publicity measures, including awareness campaigns promoted directly by the operator of the system are compulsory for all projects co-financed by the Cohesion Fund or ERDF. 
Ukrepi oglaševanja, vključno s kampanjami za ozaveščanje, ki jih neposredno spodbuja upravljavec sistema, so obvezni za vse projekte, sofinancirane iz Kohezijskega sklada ali ESRR.
For the 2000–06 Cohesion Fund projects this was verified at closure via the final reports. 
Pri programih Kohezijskega sklada iz obdobja 2000–2006 je bilo izpolnjevanje te obveznosti preverjeno ob zaključku projekta na podlagi končnih poročil.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 48. (b) It is the responsibility of the national/regional/local competent authorities to ensure that information campaigns are carried out to raise the awareness of the population on the waste management practices and infrastructure available. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE 48.(b) Nacionalni/regionalni/lokalni pristojni organi so odgovorni za zagotovitev izvajanja kampanj za informiranje z namenom ozaveščanja prebivalcev o praksah gospodarjenja z odpadki in razpoložljivi infrastrukturi.
However, it is recognised that sustained efforts are needed in order to ensure full participation of the population to ensure the success of the waste collection and overall waste management. 
Vendar se priznava, da so za zagotovitev popolnega sodelovanja prebivalcev, ki je nujno za uspešno zbiranje odpadkov in splošno gospodarjenje z odpadki, potrebna trajna prizadevanja.
Furthermore, Romania obtained a 4-year derogation for the biodegradable diversion targets and therefore has only to be compliant by 2020. 
Poleg tega je bilo Romuniji priznano štiriletno odstopanje v zvezi s ciljnimi vrednostmi za preusmerjanje biološko razgradljivih odpadkov z odlagališč, torej jih mora doseči šele do leta 2020.
The Commission refers to its reply to Observation 44 (a). 
Komisija se sklicuje na odgovor na opažanje 44 (a).
In EU waste legislation there was no legal requirement whereby compost standards had to be adopted. 
Zakonodaja EU na področju odpadkov ni vključevala nobene zakonske zahteve glede sprejetja standardov za kompost.
Common reply to Observation 53 (a) and (b) The Commission concurs that the use of economic instruments will help Member States in the implementation of the ‘polluter pays principle’ enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union7. 
Skupni odgovor na opažanje 53 (a) in (b) Komisija se strinja, da bo uporaba ekonomskih instrumentov državam članicam pomagala pri izvajanju načela „povzročitelj plača“ iz Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije7.