natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The CFP regulations did not sufficiently specify Member States’ annual reporting requirements and Member States which prepared inadequate fleet reports suffered no adverse consequences. 
V uredbah o SRP niso bile dovolj natančno določene zahteve za letno poročanje držav članic in za države članice, ki so pripravile neustrezna poročila o flotah, ni bilo nobenih negativnih posledic.
By contrast, if Member States submit incomplete annual EFF implementation reports the Commission can interrupt interim payments under Article 83 of the EFF regulation. 
Če pa države članice predložijo nepopolna letna poročila o izvajanju ESR, lahko Komisija po členu 83 uredbe o ESR prekine vmesna plačila.
Although most annual fleet reports of the Member States visited by the Court gave extensive information on Member States’ fishing activities and fishing capacity, the reports of France, Poland, Portugal and Spain do not allow a conclusion to be drawn on the balance between the fishing capacity of their fishing fleets and available fishing opportunities. 
Čeprav je večina letnih poročil držav članic, ki jih je obiskalo Sodišče, o flotah, vsebovala obširne informacije o ribolovnih dejavnostih držav članic in ribolovni zmogljivosti, pa iz poročil Francije, Poljske, Portugalske in Španije ni mogoče zaključiti o ravnovesju med ribolovno zmogljivostjo njihovih ribolovnih flot in razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi možnostmi.
These Member States did not apply the Commission’s guidelines of March 2008. 
Te države članice niso uporabljale smernic Komisije iz marca 2008.
The United Kingdom uses other technical indicators to assess the balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities, but did not explain how its system of capacity entitlements created rights to capacity41. 
Združeno kraljestvo uporablja druge tehnične kazalnike za ocenjevanje ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi, vendar ni pojasnilo, kako so bile v njegovem sistemu pravic do zmogljivosti te pravice določene41.
Italy and Denmark adequately applied the Commission guidelines and produced annual reports which sufficiently examined the balance between fishing capacity and fishing resources. 
Italija in Danska sta ustrezno uporabili smernice Komisije in pripravili letni poročili, v katerih je bilo dovolj preučeno ravnovesje med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi viri.
Because of inadequate reporting by Member States there is no clear overview at EU level on the balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities. 
Zaradi neustreznega poročanja držav članic na ravni EU ni jasnega pregleda nad ravnovesjem med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi.
This complicates the identification of suitable policies to reduce fishing overcapacity and makes it difficult to assess the performance of those policies. 
Zato je oblikovanje primernih politik za zmanjšanje presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti zapleteno in je težko ocenjevati njihovo uspešnost.
41 At4October2010,these entitlements represented 81 891 kW and 21 957 GT. 37 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
41 Nadan4.10.2010sote pravice predstavljale 81 891 kW in 21 957 BT. 37 Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
Overcapacity of the fishing fleet continues to be one of the main reasons for the failure of the CFP in assuring a sustainable fishing activity. 
Presežna zmogljivost ribolovne flote je še vedno eden od glavnih razlogov za neuspeh SRP pri zagotavljanju trajnostne ribolovne dejavnosti.
Although the reduction of fishing overcapacity has been a recurrent theme in previous reforms of the CFP, current measures have failed. 
Čeprav je bilo zmanjšanje presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti ponavljajoča se tema pri prejšnjih reformah SRP, sedanji ukrepi niso bili uspešni.
This indicates that either a new approach to tackling the problem needs to be adopted, and/or existing measures have to be better enforced. 
To kaže, da je treba sprejeti nov pristop k reševanju problema in/ali bolje uveljaviti obstoječe ukrepe.
THE FRAMEWORK FOR THE MEASURES TO BALANCE FISHING CAPACITY WITH AVAILABLE FISHING OPPORTUNITIES IS UNSATISFACTORY 75. 
OKVIR ZA UKREPE ZA DOSEGANJE RAVNOVESJA MED RIBOLOVNO ZMOGLJIVOSTJO IN RAZPOLOŽLJIVIMI RIBOLOVNIMI MOŽNOSTMI NI ZADOVOLJIV 75.
The CFP does not have adequate rules for key issues related to overcapacity of the fishing fleet: (a) given constant technological developments, the existing definitions of fishing capacity no longer adequately reflect the ability of fishing vessels to catch fish (paragraphs 21 and 22); (b)ceilings do not impose real restrictions on fishing fleet capacity (paragraph 23); (c) although the alignment of fishing capacity to fishing opportunities is one of the cornerstones of the CFP and the EFF, fishing overcapacity has not been defined or quantified. 
SRP nima ustreznih pravil za ključna vprašanja, povezana s presežno zmogljivostjo ribolovne flote: (a) glede na stalen tehnološki razvoj, obstoječe opredelitve ribolovne zmogljivosti ne odražajo več ustrezno dejanske ribolovne zmožnosti plovil (odstavka 21 in 22); (b) zgornje meje ne pomenijo dejanskih omejitev zmogljivosti ribolovne flote (odstavek 23); (c) čeprav je uskladitev ribolovne zmogljivosti z ribolovnimi možnostmi eden od temeljev SRP in ESR, presežna ribolovna zmogljivost ni bila opredeljena niti količinsko določena.
This complicates the design of measures to reduce it and makes it difficult to assess the performance of those measures at Member State level (paragraphs 24 and 25); (d)there are not sufficiently clear rules for the treatment (can-cellation/transfer/sale) of fishing rights when fishing vessels are scrapped with public aid. 
Zato je oblikovanje ukrepov za njeno zmanjšanje zapleteno in je težko ocenjevati njihovo uspešnost na ravni držav članic (odstavka 24 in 25); (d) ni dovolj jasnih pravil za obravnavanje (razveljavitev/pre-nos/prodaja) ribolovnih pravic, kadar so ribiška plovila dana v razrez z javno pomočjo.
Furthermore, the role of fishing rights in aligning fishing capacity to fishing opportunities is not specified by the regulations (paragraphs 26 to 33). Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Poleg tega v uredbah ni določena vloga ribolovnih pravic pri usklajevanju ribolovne zmogljivosti z ribolovnimi možnostmi (odstavki od 26 do 33). Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
39 THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MEASURES TO BALANCE FISHING CAPACITY WITH AVAILABLE FISHING OPPORTUNITIES IS UNSATISFACTORY 76. 
Zasnova in izvajanje ukrepov za doseganje ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi možnostmi nista zadovoljiva.
Member States have not fulfilled their obligation under the CFP of putting in place effective measures to match fishing capacity to fishing opportunities, and the Commission’s monitoring and supervision of the Member States did not prevent significant implementation problems. 
Države članice niso izpolnile svoje obveznosti v skladu s SRP, po kateri bi morale vzpostaviti uspešne ukrepe za uskladitev ribolovne zmogljivosti z ribolovnimi možnostmi, spremljanje in nadziranje držav članic, ki ga je izvajala Komisija, pa ni preprečilo večjih težav pri izvajanju.
The design of some measures is also unsatisfactory. (a) There were delays in implementing EFF-funded projects and in setting up management and control systems (paragraphs 36 and 37). (b)Fishing effort adjustment plans did not provide a sound basis to adapt the capacity of fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities (paragraphs 38 to 40). (c) Four of the seven Member States examined in the audit had set inadequate targets for reducing capacity. 
Tudi zasnova nekaterih ukrepov je nezadovoljiva. (a) Pri izvajanju projektov, ki jih je financiral ESR, in vzpostavljanju upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov je prihajalo do zamud (odstavka 36 in 37). (b) Načrti za prilagoditev ribolovnega napora niso zagotavljali trdne osnove za prilagoditev zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim (odstavki od 38 do 40). (c) Štiri od sedmih držav članic, preučenih med revizijo, so določile neustrezne cilje za zmanjšanje zmogljivosti.
This increases the risk that fishing fleet overcapacity is not adequately targeted for reduction (paragraphs 41 and 42). (d)Subsidised investment on board fishing vessels may in practice increase their ability to catch fish (paragraphs 43 to 47). (e)The fishing fleet register was not correctly updated with details of fishing vessels scrapped with public aid. 
To povečuje tveganje, da niso določeni ustrezni cilji za zmanjšanje presežne zmogljivosti ribolovne flote (odstavka 41 in 42). (d) Subvencionirane naložbe v ribiška plovila lahko v praksi povečujejo njihovo dejansko ribolovno zmožnost (odstavki od 43 do 47). (e) Register ribolovne flote ni bil pravilno posodobljen s podatki o ribiških plovilih, danih v razrez z javno pomočjo.
This overstated the fishing fleet capacity ceilings (paragraphs 48 to 50). (f ) The eligibility and selection criteria for fishing vessel decommissioning schemes were not well targeted. 
Zato so bile zgornje meje zmogljivosti ribolovne flote navedene previsoko (odstavki od 48 do 50). (f) Merila za upravičenost in izbiro pri shemah za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja niso bila dobro ciljno usmerjena.
This resulted in scrapping fishing vessels which had little if any impact on the targeted fish stocks (paragraphs 51 to 58). (g)The public aid rates used for decommissioning fishing vessels generally did not take into account their cost effectiveness on the basis of sufficient objective criteria (paragraphs 59 to 62). Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Zato so bila dana v razrez ribiška plovila, ki so imela malo učinka na ciljne ribje staleže ali pa ga sploh niso imela (odstavki 51 do 58). (g) Pri stopnjah javne pomoči, ki so se uporabljale za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja, na splošno ni bila upoštevana njihova stroškovna učinkovitost na podlagi zadostnih objektivnih meril (odstavki od 59 do 62). Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
40 (h)The application of the ‘fuel crisis regulation’ had not obtained the required fishing fleet capacity reductions (paragraphs 63 to 68). (i) The rules under which Member States report on their efforts to balance fishing capacity with fishing opportunities are inadequate and lack clarity. 
40 (h) Uporaba „uredbe o krizi zaradi goriva“ ni dosegla zahtevanih zmanjšanj zmogljivosti ribolovne flote (odstavki od 63 do 68). (i) Pravila za poročanje držav članic o njihovih prizadevanjih za doseganje ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi niso ustrezna in jasna.
This is one of the reasons for the incomplete and inadequate reporting by most Member States, with the consequence that it is impossible to derive conclusions regarding fishing overcapacity (paragraphs 69 to 73). Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
To je eden od razlogov za nepopolno in neustrezno poročanje večine držav članic, posledično pa je nemogoče izpeljati zaključke o presežni ribolovni zmogljivosti (odstavki od 69 do 73). Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
RECOMMENDATIONS 77. 
PRIPOROČILI 77.
In order to reduce overcapacity of the fishing fleet and to contribute to the achievement of a sustainable fishing sector, the Court makes the following recommendations. 
Sodišče podaja naslednji priporočili za zmanjšanje presežne zmogljivosti ribolovne flote in doseganje trajnostnega ribolovnega sektorja.
41 RECOMMENDATION 1 The Commission should take the necessary initiatives, including considering whether amendments to the basic regulations are necessary, in order to: (a) better define fishing capacity and overcapacity and consider more relevant robust measures to facilitate actions to balance fishing capacity with fishing opportunities; (b) set effective limits for fishing fleet capacity; (c) ensure that the design and implementation of FEAPs effectively target required reductions in fishing effort; (d) clarify how fishing rights should be treated when decommissioning fishing vessels with public aid; (e) clarify whether fishing right transfer schemes have a role in reducing fishing overcapacity; (f) establish whether the scheme of public aid for on-board investments needs to be reconsidered in light of the difficulties in avoiding investments which increase fishing ability and, if the scheme is to continue, clarify which investments on board are eligible for public aid and which are not; (g) place unambiguous obligations on Member States to ensure that the fleet register is correctly updated, and that reports on their efforts to balance fishing capacity with fishing opportunities provide the required information and are of suitable quality. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
41 PRIPOROČILO 1 Komisija bi morala prevzeti potrebne pobude, vključno z razmislekom o tem, ali so potrebne spremembe temeljnih uredb, da bi: (a) bolje opredelila ribolovno zmogljivost in presežno ribolovno zmogljivost ter razmislila o bolj relevantnih trdnejših ukrepih za olajšanje dejavnosti za doseganje ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi; (b) določila učinkovite omejitve zmogljivosti ribolovne flote; (c) zagotovila, da sta zasnova in izvajanje FEAP uspešno ciljno usmerjena v zahtevana zmanjšanja ribolovnega napora; (d) pojasnila, kako je treba obravnavati ribolovne pravice pri umiku plovil iz obratovanja z javno pomočjo; (e) pojasnila, ali imajo sheme za prenos ribolovnih pravic vlogo pri zmanjšanju presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti; (f) ugotovila, ali je treba ponovno razmisliti o shemi javne pomoči za naložbe v ribiška plovila glede na težave pri preprečevanju naložb, ki povečujejo ribolovne zmožnosti, in če se bo shema še naprej izvajala, pojasnila, katere naložbe v ribiška plovila so upravičene do javne pomoči in katere niso; (g) določila nedvoumne obveznosti za države članice, s katerimi bi zagotovila, da je register flote pravilno posodobljen, in da poročila o njihovih prizadevanjih za doseganje ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi vsebujejo zahtevane informacije in so primerne kakovosti. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
42 RECOMMENDATION 2 When implementing CFP measures related to adapting the fishing capacity of their fishing fleets to available fishing resources, Member States should: (a) take corrective action to eliminate delays in implementation of the EFF; (b) ensure that any measures to aid investments on board are strictly applied and do not increase fishing ability; (c) ensure that the fishing fleet register is kept up to date; (d) ensure that selection criteria for fishing vessel decommissioning schemes are designed to have a positive impact on the sustainability of the targeted fish stocks and avoid providing public aid for decommissioning inactive fishing vessels; (e) ensure that public aid rates for decommissioned fishing vessels take into account their cost effectiveness on the basis of sufficient objective criteria; (f) use the Commission’s guidelines when producing annual reports on their efforts to achieve a sustainable balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities and give reasoned conclusions on the state of that balance. 
42 PRIPOROČILO 2 Države članice bi morale pri izvajanju ukrepov SRP, povezanih s prilagajanjem ribolovne zmogljivosti njihovih ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim virom: (a) sprejeti popravne ukrepe za odpravo zamud pri izvajanju ESR; (b) poskrbeti, da se vsi ukrepi pomoči za naložbe v ribiška plovila dosledno uporabljajo in da ne povečujejo ribolovnih zmožnosti; (c) poskrbeti, da je register ribolovne flote posodobljen; (d) poskrbeti, da so izbirna merila pri shemah za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja zasnovana tako, da pozitivno učinkujejo na trajnost ciljnih ribjih staležev in da se prepreči zagotavljanje javne pomoči za umik neaktivnih ribiških plovil iz obratovanja; (e) poskrbeti, da se pri stopnjah javne pomoči za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja upošteva njihova stroškovna učinkovitost na podlagi zadostnih objektivnih meril; (f) uporabljati smernice Komisije pri pripravi letnih poročil o svojih prizadevanjih za doseganje trajnostnega ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi ter podati utemeljene zaključke o stanju tega ravnovesja.
This report was adopted by Chamber I, headed by Mr Olavi ALA-NISSILÄ, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 28 September 2011. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat I, ki ga vodi g. Olavi ALA-NISSILÄ, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju 28. septembra 2011.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
46 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? REPLY OF THE COMMISSION SUMMARY IV. (a) Fishing capacity is quantified on the basis of fishing capacity indicators. 
12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim? 46 Posebno poročilo št. ODGOVORI KOMISIJE POVZETEK IV. (a) Ribolovna zmogljivost je količinsko opredeljena na podlagi kazalnikov ribolovne zmogljivosti.
All possible indicators including GT (gross tonnage) and kW have advantages and disadvantages, and all of them are subject to the effects of technological progress. 
Vsi možni kazalniki, vključno z BT (bruto tonažo) in kW, imajo prednosti in slabosti, vsi pa so podvrženi učinkom tehnološkega napredka.
Indicators based on fishing gear size and characteristics may theoretically have a closer relationship to fishing mortality; nevertheless, capacity or effort limitations based upon them are significantly more difficult and resource-intensive to enforce and require much more data. 
Kazalniki, ki temeljijo na velikosti in značilnostih ribolovne opreme, so teoretično lahko tesneje povezani z ribolovno umrljivostjo; vendar je omejitve zmogljivosti ali napora, ki temeljijo na njih, veliko težje uveljaviti ter je za to potrebnih mnogo virov in veliko več podatkov.
IV. (b) The fleet capacity ceilings are used only in the context of public financial support for the decommissioning of fishing vessels under the EFF (European Fisheries Fund) regulation ((EC) No 1198/2006), and are the result of the implementation of the entry–exit regime for the management of fishing capacity, as set out in the basic CFP (common fisheries policy) regulation ((EC) No 2371/2002). 
IV. (b) Zgornje meje zmogljivosti flot se uporabljajo samo v okviru javne finančne pomoči za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1198/2006 o ESR (Evropskem skladu za ribištvo) in so rezultat izvajanja režima vstopov/izstopov za upravljanje ribolovne zmogljivosti, kot je določeno v osnovni uredbi o SRP (skupni ribiški politiki) (Uredba (ES) št.
Most Member States continue to apply a strict entry–exit regime to all vessel replacements and do not use the capacity margin they have under their reference level for the capacity of the fishing fleet IV. (c) In order to assist the Member States in assessing the capacity of their fleets, the Commission drafted in 2008 ‘Guidelines for an improved analysis of the balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities’. 
2371/2002). Večina držav članic še naprej izvaja strog režim vstopov/izstopov za vse zamenjave plovil in ne uporablja meje zmogljivosti, ki jo ima v okviru svoje referenčne ravni za zmogljivost ribolovne flote.
These guidelines were based on the scientific advice of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), and represent a common methodological framework of indicators for helping Member States to assess the balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities. 
Te smernice so temeljile na znanstvenem mnenju Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvo (STECF) ter predstavljajo skupen metodološki okvir kazalnikov za pomoč državam članicam pri ocenjevanju ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi.
The work initiated by the Commission, together with Member States and the STECF, can provide qualitative estimations of overcapacity based on a combination of technical, biological, economic and social indicators. 
Dejavnosti, začete na pobudo Komisije skupaj z državami članicami in STECF, lahko zagotovijo kakovostne ocene presežne zmogljivosti na podlagi kombinacije tehničnih, bioloških, gospodarskih in družbenih kazalnikov.
47 On 13 July, the Commission presented its proposal for the reform of the common fisheries policy. 
47 Komisija je 13. julija predložila svoj predlog za reformo skupne ribiške politike.
A key element of the reform is the replacement of the current, publicly funded approach to reduction of overcapacity with a new, market-based approach (transferable fishing concessions), which should effectively address the Court’s recommendation to develop actions to effectively reduce the overcapacity of the fishing fleet. 
Ključni element reforme je zamenjava trenutnega, javno financiranega pristopa k zmanjšanju presežne zmogljivosti z novim, tržno zasnovanim pristopom (prenosljivimi ribolovnimi koncesijami), ki bi učinkovito obravnaval priporočila Sodišča za razvoj ukrepov za učinkovito zmanjšanje presežne zmogljivosti ribolovne flote.
IV. (d) The experience in Europe with an approach based on transferable fishing rights prior to the 2002 common fisheries policy reform was too limited to be taken into account. 
IV. (d) Izkušnje s pristopom, ki temelji na prenosljivih ribolovnih pravicah, v Evropi pred reformo skupne ribiške politike leta 2002 so bile preveč omejene, da bi se upoštevale.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION V. (b) The fishing effort adjustment plans (FEAPs) are adopted in line with the rules set out in Articles 5 to 16 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE V. (b) Načrti za prilagajanje ribolovnega napora (FEAP) so sprejeti v skladu s pravili, določenimi v členih 5 do 16 Uredbe Sveta št. 2371/2002.
Their content is defined in Article 22 of the EFF regulation and detailed in the EFF vademecum officially communicated to all Member States. 
Njihova vsebina je določena v členu 22 uredbe o ESR in podrobno opredeljena v Priročniku o ESR, ki je bil uradno poslan vsem državam članicam.
However, the Commission agrees with the Court that these rules were not strong enough to ensure sufficiently sound design of the FEAPs. 
Vendar se Komisija strinja s Sodiščem, da ta pravila niso bila dovolj močna za zagotovitev povsem zanesljivega oblikovanja FEAP.
This is why the Commission has devoted particular attention to ensuring the correct implementation of FEAPs by the Member States via monitoring and control activities, thus leading to a number of payment interruptions under Article 88 of the EFF regulation. 
Zato je Komisija posebno pozornost namenila temu, da s spremljanjem in nadzorom zagotovi pravilno izvajanje FEAP s strani držav članic, kar je povzročilo številne prekinitve plačil v skladu s členom 88 uredbe o ESR.
V. (c) The Commission agrees with the Court. 
V. (c) Komisija se strinja s Sodiščem.