natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The regulatory provisions for the 2014-2020 period significantly strengthen the Commission’s position on protecting the EU budget from irregular expenditure. This is mainly due to the fact that the Member State’s reporting on financial corrections is now integrated into the annual assurance package and examined by the audit authority. 
Uredbene določbe za obdobje 2014–2020 bistveno krepijo možnosti Komisije za zaščito proračuna EU pred nepravilnimi odhodki, in sicer zato, ker je poročanje držav članic o finančnih popravkih zdaj vključeno v letni sveženj zagotovil, preuči pa ga revizijski organ.
Moreover the legal provisions introduced for the 2014-2020 period give more power to the Commission to ensure that irregular expenditure is no longer reimbursed from the EU budget. 
Poleg tega pravne določbe, ki so bile uvedene za obdobje 2014–2020, dajejo Komisiji več pooblastil za zagotavljanje, da se nepravilni odhodki ne povrnejo več iz proračuna EU.
Finally, there is also increased legal certainty for Member States due to the rules being set as regulations rather than guidance. 
Nazadnje pa določitev pravil v uredbah in ne v smernicah prinaša tudi večjo pravno varnost za države članice.
Overall, we consider that these arrangements for the 2014-2020 period are a significant improvement in the design of the system Recommendation 4 The Commission should make effective use of the significantly strengthened provisions for the 2014-2020 period and impose net financial corrections wherever necessary on the basis of its own checks and/or the audits carried out by the European Court of Auditors. 
Na splošno Sodišče meni, da so te ureditve za obdobje 2014–2020 bistvena izboljšava v zasnovi sistema. 70 Priporočilo 4 Komisija naj uspešno uporablja bistveno okrepljene določbe za obdobje 2014–2020 in po potrebi naloži neto finančne popravke na podlagi lastnih pregledov in/ali revizij, ki jih je opravilo Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Target implementation date: immediately. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: takoj.
This Report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mrs Iliana IVANOVA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 8 March 2017. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat II, ki ga vodi Iliana IVANOVA, članica Evropskega Računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 8. marca 2017.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President 71 
Za Evropsko računsko sodišče Klaus-Heiner LEHNE Predsednik
Annex I An OP can be affected by different preventive measures and/or financial corrections several times during its lifetime and for several reasons. 
Postopki Komisije za preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke Na operativne programe lahko večkrat v času njihovega trajanja in iz več razlogov vplivajo različni preventivni ukrepi in/ali finančni popravki.
The full path of events for an issue which links the preventive measures and financial corrections with the same triggering event(s) is referred to as a ‘case’ in this report. 
Za celoten potek dogodkov v zvezi z zadevo, ki je povezana s preventivnimi ukrepi in finančnimi popravki, katerih uvedbo je povzročil isti dogodek (ali več dogodkov), se v tem poročilu uporablja izraz „primer”.
One case might therefore involve one or more preventive measure(s) and/or one or more financial correction(s). 
Za en primer se torej lahko uvede en ali več preventivnih ukrepov in/ali en ali več finančnih popravkov.
From the triggering event until the lifting of the preventive measure Preventive measures applied by the Commission are triggered by irregularities or serious deficiencies identified by Member State authorities (e.g. managing or audit authority), by the Commission or by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) in the course of carrying out their verifications and audits The Commission can initiate a payment interruption or a warning at any time if evidence suggests a serious deficiency in the OP’s management and control system. 
Od dogodka, ki povzroči uvedbo postopka, do odprave preventivnega ukrepa Uvedbo preventivnih ukrepov, ki jih je uporabila Komisija, so povzročile nepravilnosti ali hude pomanjkljivosti, ki so jih ugotovili organi držav članic (npr. organ upravljanja ali revizijski organ), Komisija ali Evropsko računsko sodišče pri opravljanju svojih preverjanj in revizij. Komisija lahko kadar koli prekine plačila ali izreče opozorilo, če obstajajo dokazi o resnih pomanjkljivostih v sistemu upravljanja in kontrole operativnega programa.
The Member State then has two options: it can (a) dispute the existence of the deficiency identified and give further information to explain its position, or (b) accept the existence of the deficiency and propose remedial actions. 
Država članica ima potem na voljo dve možnosti: lahko (a) izpodbija obstoj ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti in navede dodatne informacije za razlago svojega stališča, ali (b) sprejme obstoj pomanjkljivosti in predlaga popravljalne ukrepe.
The remedy can take the form of an action plan and/or a financial correction (‘confirmed’ financial correction). 
To ima lahko obliko akcijskega načrta in/ali finančnega popravka („potrjen” finančni popravek).
If the Commission is satisfied with the reply of the Member State, it lifts the interruption or the warning. 
Če je Komisija zadovoljna z odgovorom države članice, odpravi prekinitev ali opozorilo.
Otherwise, the Commission initiates a suspension procedure after having obtained evidence of a serious deficiency in the management and control system. 
V nasprotnem primeru pa uvede postopek za začasno ustavitev plačil po pridobitvi dokazov o resni pomanjkljivosti v sistemu upravljanja in kontrole.
The first step in the suspension procedure is to send a pre‐suspension letter in which the Commission informs the Member State of the deficiency. 
Prva faza postopka za začasno ustavitev plačil je, da Komisija zadevno državo članico v dopisu o predhodni začasni ustavitvi obvesti o pomanjkljivosti.
Then, the Member State may again choose to dispute the deficiency or accept the deficiency and propose remedial action. 
Potem lahko država članica znova izpodbija obstoj pomanjkljivosti ali ga sprejme in predlaga popravljalne ukrepe.
These steps in the procedure, and the correspondence between the Commission and the Member State, might take place in several rounds. 
Te faze postopka in korespondenca med Komisijo in zadevno državo članico lahko potekajo v več krogih.
If the Commission finds the Member State's reply satisfactory, it lifts the pre‐suspension. 
Če Komisija meni, da je odgovor države članice zadovoljiv, odpravi predhodno začasno ustavitev plačil.
This can be done at any time in the procedure. 
To lahko stori v kateri koli fazi postopka.
Otherwise, the Commission decides to suspend payments to the OP, which is a legally binding act. 
V nasprotnem primeru se Komisija odloči za začasno ustavitev plačil za zadevni operativni program s pravno zavezujočim aktom.
The, the Member State is required to propose a remedial act in order that the Commission to lift the suspension. 
Država članica mora predlagati popravljalne ukrepe, da lahko Komisija odpravi začasno ustavitev.
The lifting of an interruption and pre‐suspension takes the form of a letter informing the Member State about the lifting, while the suspension is lifted by issuing a repealing decision. 
Komisija prekinitev in predhodno začasno ustavitev plačil odpravi tako, da državo članico o tem obvesti z dopisom, začasna ustavitev plačil pa se odpravi z izdajo sklepa o razveljavitvi.
From the triggering event until implementation of the financial correction The triggering events for financial corrections are similar to those for preventive measures. 
Od dogodka, ki povzroči uvedbo postopka, do izvedbe finančnega popravka Dogodki, ki povzročijo uvedbo postopka za finančne popravke, so podobni tistim, ki povzročijo uvedbo postopka za preventivne ukrepe.
Again, the Commission will first proceed by clearing the facts with the Member State (via exchange of letters and potentially by a hearing of the Member State). 
Tudi v tem primeru Komisija najprej razjasni dejstva z zadevno državo članico (s korespondenco in morda s posvetom z državo članico).
Following this, a financial correction can be established in two ways. 
Potem se finančni popravek lahko uvede na dva načina.
After the amount to be corrected has been established, the Member State needs to implement the financial correction (‘implemented’ financial correction). 
Ko se določi znesek popravka, mora država članica izvesti finančni popravek („izveden” finančni popravek).
With regard to the EU budget, the Member State can deduct the amount from the next statement of expenditure and may later replace it by new expenditure. 
Kar zadeva proračun EU, lahko zadevna država članica znesek odšteje od naslednjega izkaza odhodkov in ga kasneje nadomesti z novimi odhodki.
Depending on the time when the deduction takes place, the Member State immediately withdraw the amount from the next statement of expenditure (withdrawal) releasing the funds to other projects, and recover the amount from the beneficiaries later. 2 
Odvisno od trenutka, v katerem se znesek odšteje, država članica nemudoma prekliče znesek iz naslednjega izkaza odhodkov (preklic), s čimer da sredstva na voljo za druge projekte, znesek pa od upravičencev izterja kasneje. 2
Otherwise, the Member State can wait until the amount is paid back by the beneficiary (recovery from beneficiary) and deduct it from a later statement of expenditure. 
Sicer pa lahko država članica čaka, da upravičenec vrne znesek (izterjava od upravičenca), in ga odšteje od poznejšega izkaza odhodkov.
In the case of net financial corrections, the OP envelope is reduced (by way of decommitment) and the Member State needs to pay back the amount already received (or at closure it gets a lower amount of final payment). 
V primeru neto finančnih popravkov se sredstva za operativni program zmanjšajo (z razveljavitvijo) in država članica mora vrniti že prejet znesek (ali pa ob zaključku programa prejme nižji znesek končnega plačila).
For financial corrections with regard to the beneficiaries, Member States must take all the necessary measures in order to recover the unduly paid amounts 56. 
Za finančne popravke v zvezi z upravičenci morajo države članice sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za izterjavo neupravičeno izplačanih zneskov.56 To pomeni, da morajo od upravičencev izterjati vse nepravilne zneske.
However, this is not possible in all cases e.g. due to the bankruptcy of the beneficiary. 
To pa ni vedno mogoče, npr. zaradi stečaja upravičenca.
It may also be that the error leading to the correction was not committed by the beneficiary, but was due to the weaknesses in the management and control system set up by the Member State. 
Mogoče je tudi, da napake, ki je privedla do popravka, ni storil upravičenec, temveč je bila posledica slabosti v sistemu upravljanja in kontrole, ki ga je vzpostavila zadevna država članica.
If the Member State cannot recover the irregular amounts in full from beneficiaries, it is the national/regional budget which bears the financial correction. 
Če država članica ne more v celoti izterjati nepravilnih zneskov od upravičencev, mora finančni popravek prevzeti nacionalni/regionalni proračun.
If the beneficiary is insolvent, the amount lost can be shared between the EU and the national budget57. Action plans When imposing preventive measures and/or financial corrections, the Commission can also request Member States to set up action plans. 
Če je upravičenec plačilno nesposoben, se lahko izgubljeni znesek razdeli med EU in nacionalni proračun.57 Akcijski načrti Pri nalaganju preventivnih ukrepov in/ali finančnih popravkov lahko Komisija od držav članic zahteva tudi, da pripravijo akcijske načrte.
In these action plans Member States describe how the deficiencies in their management and control systems will be corrected in order to prevent problems occurring in the future. 
V teh akcijskih načrtih države članice opišejo, kako bodo odpravljene pomanjkljivosti v njihovih sistemih upravljanja in kontrole, da se preprečijo problemi v prihodnosti.
In most cases the Commission addresses a letter to a Member State which sets out the conditions that must be met to exit from the Commission’s preventive or financial correction procedures (exit points). 
V večini primerov Komisija pošlje dopis, naslovljen na zadevno državo članico, v katerem so navedeni pogoji, ki jih mora ta izpolniti za izhod iz postopka Komisije za preventivne ukrepe ali finančne popravke (izhodne točke).
The Member States use such letters to set up actions which are followed up by the Commission or, on its behalf, by the Member State’s audit authority. 
Države članice uporabijo te dopise za pripravo načrtov popravljanih ukrepov, ki jih imenu Komisije spremlja revizijski organ države članice.
56 57 3 Article 70 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
56 57 3 Člen 70 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006. 
Člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 1828/2006.
4 2000‐2006 Interruption N/A 2007‐2013 Criteria: Evidence from a Member State or 2014‐2020 Criteria: Evidence to suggest a deficiency in the Suspension Criteria: Lack of Member State compliance with its obligations to detect irregularities and impose FC; part or whole of Criteria: A serious deficiency in the management and control system of the OP, expenditure in a certified statement is linked Criteria: A serious deficiency in the effective functioning of the management and control system of the OP; expenditure in a statement of 58 59 Article 91 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Prekinitev n. r. Začasna ustavitev Merila: Država članica ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti v zvezi z odkrivanjem nepravilnosti in nalaganjem finančnih popravkov, del ali celota prispevkov iz Merila: Resna pomanjkljivost v sistemu upravljanja in kontrole operativnega programa, odhodek v potrjenem izkazu odhodkovjepovezanzresnonepravilnostjo, Merila: Resna pomanjkljivost v uspešnem delovanju sistema upravljanja in kontrole operativnega programa, odhodek v izkazu odhodkov je povezan z nepravilnostjo,državačlanicanisprejelaukrepov, 58 59 Člen 91 Uredbe (ES) št.
Article 83 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
Člen 83 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
Comparison of regulatory provisions: 2000‐2006, 2007‐2013 and 2014‐2020 periods Commission report suggests a significant deficiency in the functioning of the management and control system of the OP; or the authorising officer has evidence to suggest a statement of expenditure is linked to an irregularity. management and control system of the OP; or the authorising officer has evidence to suggest a statement of expenditure is linked to an irregularity. 
2000–2006 2007–2013 Merila: Dokazi iz poročila neke države članice 2014–2020 Merila: Dokazi kažejo na pomanjkljivost sistema Primerjava uredbenih določb: obdobja 2000–2006, 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 ali Komisije kažejo, da obstaja pomembna pomanjkljivost v delovanju sistema upravljanja in kontrole operativnega programa, ali pa ima odredbodajalec dokaze, ki kažejo, da je v izkazu odhodkov napaka. upravljanja in kontrole operativnega programa, ali pa ima odredbodajalec dokaze, ki kažejo, da je v izkazu odhodkov napaka.
Implementation: Letter from the Commission informing the Member State of the interruption. 
Izvajanje: Komisija z dopisom državo članico obvesti o prekinitvi.
Implementation: The Commission shall interrupt only those parts of the expenditure covered by the payment claim affected by the identified deficiencies where this is possible. 
Izvajanje: Komisija prekine samo tiste dele odhodkov, ki jih zajema zahtevek za plačilo, na katerega so vplivale ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti, kadar je to mogoče.
It shall inform the Member State immediately of the interruption in writing (letter). 
O prekinitvi nemudoma pisno obvesti zadevno državo članico (dopis).
Timing: The Interruption can run for a maximum of six months.58 Timing: The payment deadline for an interim payment claim may be interrupted for a maximum period of six months. 
Časovnica: Prekinitev lahko traja največ šest mesecev.58 Časovnica: Rok izplačila za zahtevek za vmesno plačilo se lahko prekine za največ šest mesecev.
The Member State may agree to an extension of the interruption period for another three months.59 Annex II 1 
Država članica lahko privoli, da se obdobje prekinitve podaljša za dodatne tri mesece.59 Priloga II 1
Financial correction Criteria: Member States have primary responsibility for investigating irregularities and imposing FCs. 
Finančni popravek Merila: Države članice imajo primarno odgovornost za preiskovanje nepravilnosti in nalaganje finančnih popravkov.
If the Member State does not comply with this obligation or there are Criteria: Member State have primary responsibility for investigating irregularities and imposing FCs. 
Če država članica ne izpolni te obveznosti ali če obstajajo resne pomanjkljivosti v sistemih upravljanja in kontrole, ki lahko privedejo Merila: Države članice imajo primarno odgovornost za preiskovanje nepravilnosti in nalaganje finančnih popravkov.
The Commission may make FCs when it concludes that there is a Criteria: Member State have primary responsibility for investigating irregularities and imposing FCs. 
Komisija lahko naloži finančne popravke, kadar ugotovi, da obstaja resna pomanjkljivost v sistemu upravljanja in kontrole ali da je Merila: Države članice imajo primarno odgovornost za preiskovanje nepravilnosti in nalaganje finančnih popravkov.
The Commission may make FCs if there is a serious deficiency in the effective functioning of the 60 Articles 38 and 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, and Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 448/2001 of 2 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 as regards the procedure for making financial corrections to assistance granted under the Structural Funds (OJ L 64, 6.3.2001, p. 
Komisija lahko naloži finančne popravke, kadar obstaja resna pomanjkljivost v uspešnem delovanju sistema upravljanja in kontrole operativnega programa, država članica ne izpolni 60 Člena 38 in 39 Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999 in člen 6 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 448/2001 z dne 2. marca 2001 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
61 62 Article 142 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. contributions from EU fund not justified or serious deficiency in the management and control system of the OP. to a serious irregularity which has not been corrected. expenditure is linked to an irregularity; the Member State has failed to take the necessary action to remedy the situation giving rise to an interruption; serious failure to achieve financial and output indicators; failure to comply with ex‐ante conditionalities. 
Člen 142 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013. 61 62 skladov EU nista utemeljena, resna pomanjkljivost v sistemu upravljanja in kontrole operativnega programa. ki ni bila popravljena. potrebnih za odpravo stanja, ki je povzročilo prekinitev, nedoseganje finančnih kazalnikov in kazalnikov izložkov, neupoštevanje predhodnih pogojenosti.
Implementation: The Commission informs the Member State of the issue and gives the Member State the opportunity to reply. 
Izvajanje: Komisija državo članico obvesti o zadevi in ji da možnost, da odgovori.
At the end of the procedure the Commission issues a formal decision. 
Na koncu postopka Komisija izda uraden sklep.
Implementation: All/part of interim payments are suspended after the Commission has given the Member State the opportunity to present observations. 
Izvajanje: Vsa vmesna plačila ali del vmesnih plačil se začasno ustavijo, potem ko je Komisija dala državi članici možnost, da predloži opažanja.
Implementation: Implementing act suspending all or part of interim payments. 
Izvajanje: Izvedbeni akt, s katerim se začasno ustavijo vsa vmesna plačila ali del vmesnih plačil.
Timing: Once the Commission has notified the Member State of the suspension decision, it has five months to respond/resolve the issue before a FC decision is initiated.60 Timing: The Member State has two months to respond to a Commission request for observations, after which a suspension decision can be adopted.61 Timing: There is no timing specified unless the suspension follows an interruption under Article 83 in which case it would be applied six to nine months after the initial interruption letter.62 2 
Časovnica: Ko Komisija zadevno državo članico obvesti o sklepu o začasni ustavitvi, mora ta odgovoriti/zadevo razrešiti v petih mesecih, preden se sprejme sklep o uvedbi finančnega popravka.60 Časovnica: Država članica mora na prošnjo Komisije za opažanja odgovoriti v dveh mesecih, nato pa se lahko sprejme sklep o začasni ustavitvi plačil.61 Časovnica: Ni določene časovnice, razen če začasni ustavitvi sledi prekinitev v skladu s členom 83. V tem primeru bi se uporabila šest do devet mesecev po prvem dopisu o prekinitvi.62 2
serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities, the Commission may impose its own FC. serious deficiency in the management and control system or expenditure contained in a certified statement of expenditure is irregular and had not been corrected by the Member State. management and control system of the OP; Member State failure to comply with its obligation to investigate irregularities and impose FC; serious failure to achieve the targets set out in the performance framework. Implementation: Member State FC is done by cancelling all or part of the EU contribution. 
do sistemskih nepravilnosti, lahko Komisija naloži svoje finančne popravke. odhodek v potrjenem izkazu odhodkov nepravilen in ga države članice niso popravile. svoje obveznosti v zvezi s preiskavo nepravilnosti in nalaganjem finančnih popravkov, nedoseganje ožjih ciljev, določenih v okviru smotrnosti. Izvajanje: Finančni popravek države članice se izvede tako, da ta prekliče celoten prispevek EU ali del prispevka EU.
Commission FC is done through reducing the payment on account or cancelling all or part of the contribution of the Funds to the assistance concerned. 
Finančni popravek Komisije se izvede z znižanjem plačila na račun ali preklicem celotnega prispevka skladov ali dela prispevka skladov za zadevno pomoč.
If there is no agreement between the Commission and Member State on the observation or its impact, the Commission issues a formal decision (net correction, loss of funds). 
Če se Komisija in zadevna država članica ne strinjata o opažanju ali njegovem učinku, Komisija izda uraden sklep (neto popravek, izguba sredstev).
In other cases, the amount of the correction may be reused to finance other projects. 
V drugih primerih je mogoče znesek popravka uporabiti za financiranje drugih projektov.
Implementation: Member State FC is done by cancelling all or part of the contribution to the OP. 
Izvajanje: Finančni popravek države članice se izvede tako, da ta prekliče celoten prispevek za operativni program ali del tega prispevka.
Commission FC is done by cancelling all or part of the EU contribution to the Member State concerned. 
Finančni popravek Komisije se izvede tako, da ta prekliče celoten prispevek za EU ali del prispevka EU za zadevno državo članico.
Implementation: Member State FC is done by cancelling all or part of the public contribution to an operation or OP. 
Izvajanje: Finančni popravek države članice se izvede tako, da ta prekliče celoten javni prispevek za operacijo ali operativni program ali del tega prispevka.
Commission FC is done by means of implementing acts cancelling all or part of the EU contribution to an OP. 
Finančni popravek Komisije se izvede z izvedbenimi akti, s katerimi se prekliče celoten prispevek EU za nek operativni program ali del tega prispevka.
Timing: The Commission gives the Member State two months to comment on its provisional conclusions. 
Časovnica: Komisija da državi članici na voljo dva meseca, da ta navede pripombe o začasnih ugotovitvah Komisije.
If the Commission Timing: The Commission gives the Member State two months to comment on its provisional conclusions. 
Če Komisija predlaga pavšalno stopnjo ali ekstrapoliran Časovnica: Komisija da državi članici na voljo dva meseca, da ta navede pripombe o začasnih ugotovitvah Komisije.