natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In 93 % of cases, the tourism capacity created by projects has remained at the same level since the end of the project and in 6 % of cases it has increased. 
V 93 % primerov je turistična zmogljivost, ki je rezultat projektov, po zaključku projekta ostala na isti ravni, v 6 % primerov pa se je povečala.
The level of tourism activity has remained stable or has increased since the end of the project in 94 % of cases (Figure 3). 
Raven turistične dejavnosti je ostala na isti ravni ali se je povečala v 94 % primerov (diagram 3).
98 % of completed projects were still operational at the time of the audit13. Not all projects generated sufficient revenue to cover their running costs. 
98 % zaključenih projektov je v času revizije še obstajalo13, vendar niso vsi ustvarjali dovolj prihodkov, da bi pokrili tekoče stroške.
Overall, 25 % of projects completed at least two years previously were profitable (61 % of private projects and 14 % of public ones). 
Skupaj je 25 % projektov, ki so se zaključili vsaj dve leti pred tem, prinašalo dobiček (61 % zasebnih in 14 % javnih projektov).
By their very nature, most (60 %) public projects are not intended to be profitable. 
Za večino javnih projektov (60 %) že po naravi ni mišljeno, da bi prinašali dobiček.
The public promoter, usually a local authority, assumes the running costs in exchange for other advantages for the community (e.g. free access to a swimming pool for school children, the preservation of some item of historic heritage etc.). 
Predlagatelji projektov v javnem sektorju, običajno lokalni organi, prevzamejo tekoče stroške v zameno za druge prednosti za skupnost (npr. brezplačen dostop do bazena za šolske otroke, ohranitev posameznih predmetov zgodovinske dediščine itn.).
There are other projects dedicated to such activities as renovating a public space (e.g. a street or a road), which were never intended to be revenue generating. 
Obstajajo tudi projekti, namenjeni npr. obnovi javnih površin (npr. ulice ali ceste), katerih namen nikoli ni bil ustvarjanje prihodkov.
13 One project was definitively closed two years after its start due to technical problems and three others were temporarily closed and will be re-opened after further work is carried out. 
13 En objekt je bil dokončno zaprt dve leti po začetku uporabe zaradi tehničnih problemov, trije drugi pa so bili začasno zaprti in bodo ponovno odprti, ko se opravijo nadaljnja dela.
FIGURE 3 42% 52% 6% WAS THE INCREASE IN TOURISM ACTIVITY CREATED BY PROJECTS LASTING? 
DIAGRAM 3 42% 52% 6% ALI JE BILO POVEČANJE TURISTIČNE DEJAVNOSTI, KI JE REZULTAT PROJEKTOV, TRAJNO?
Projects which increased annualvolumeoftourism 0 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 % Tourism activity has continued to increase significantly since the end of the project Tourism activity has remained at the same level since the end of the project Tourism activity has fallen since the end of the project Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 
Projekti, ki so povečali letni obseg turizma 0 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 % Turistična dejavnost je tudi po zaključku projekta močno rastla Turistična dejavnost je po zaključku projekta ostala na isti ravni Turistična dejavnost se je po zaključku projekta zmanjšala Posebno poročilo št. 6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni?
The difference in attitude between private and public project promoters with regard to profitability can be illustrated by responses to the questions in the survey on expected profitability in the coming two to three years. 
Razliko v odnosu do dobičkonosnosti med predlagatelji projektov v zasebnem in javnem sektorju je mogoče ponazoriti z odgovori na anketna vprašanja v zvezi z dobičkonosnostjo v naslednjih dveh do treh letih.
Figure 4 indicates that the question of future profitability still does not apply for 60 % of public projects in the complete survey, whereas 79 % of private promoters expect to be profitable in the coming years. 
Diagram 4 kaže, da vprašanje dobičkonosnosti v prihodnosti za 60 % javnih projektov, vključenih v celotno anketo, še vedno ni pomembno, medtem ko 79 % predlagateljev projektov v zasebnem sektorju pričakuje, da bodo njihovi projekti v naslednjih letih prinašali dobiček.
Overall, 24 % of the jobs were created or maintained by projects, the activities of which were not intended as being profitable. 
Skupaj so 24 % delovnih mest ustvarili ali ohranili projekti, katerih dejavnosti niso bile mišljene kot dobičkonosne.
27 FIGURE 4 79 % 17% 2% 2 % 26% 9% 5% 60% 39 % 11% 5% 46% FUTURE PROFITABILITY OF PROJECTS Will the activity created or developed by your project be profitable in the next 2 or 3 years? 
27 DIAGRAM 4 79% 17% 2% 2 % 26% 9% 5% 60% 39% 11% 5% 46% DOBIČKONOSNOST PROJEKTOV V PRIHODNOSTI Ali bo dejavnost, ki jo je ustvaril ali razvil vaš projekt, v naslednjih dveh ali treh letih dobičkonosna?
Private Public Overall 0 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 % Yes, probably Difficult to say Certainly not Does not apply (by its very nature, the project was not intended to create or develop economic activity) Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 
Zasebni projekti Javni projekti Skupaj 0 % 20 % Da, verjetno bo Težko je reči Nikakor ne 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 % Ni relevantno (za projekt že zaradi njegove narave ni bilo mišljeno, da bi ustvarjal ali razvijal gospodarsko dejavnost) Posebno poročilo št. 6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni?
Photo 10 — Project involving the renovation of the exterior walls and roof of a church (France) © European Union Source: European Court of Auditors, November 2009. 
Fotografija 10 – Projekt za obnovo zunanjih zidov in strehe cerkve (Francija) © Evropska unija Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče, november 2009.
DID GRANTS INFLUENCE THE EXISTENCE OR THE DESIGN OF PROJECTS? 
ALI SO DONACIJE VPLIVALE NA OBSTOJ ALI NAČRTOVANJE PROJEKTOV?
The Court asked whether public support, and ERDF funding in particular, had been a critical factor influencing either the design of projects or the decision on whether projects should be undertaken. 
Sodišče je vprašalo, ali je bila javna podpora, zlasti sredstva ESRR, ključni dejavnik, ki je vplival na načrtovanje projektov ali odločitev, ali naj se projekt sploh začne.
NOT ALL PROMOTERS FOUND PUBLIC SUPPORT NECESSARY 55. 
JAVNA PODPORA SE NI ZDELA POTREBNA VSEM PREDLAGATELJEM PROJEKTOV 55.
53 promoters (26 %, 34 public and 19 private promoters) declared that they would have undertaken the project without having received any public grant: (a) 12 promoters (6 %, all public) found that the project would have been carried out in exactly the same way i.e. the grant did not change the size, the content or the ability of the project to create jobs. 
53 predlagateljem projektov (26 %, 34 predlagateljev v javnem in 19 v zasebnem sektorju) je navedlo, da bi se projekta lotili, tudi če ne bi prejeli nobene javne donacije: (a) 12 predlagateljev (6 %, vsi v javnem sektorju) je menilo, da bi bili projekti izvedeni popolnoma enako, kar pomeni, da donacija ni spremenila velikosti, vsebine niti sposobnosti projekta za ustvarjanje delovnih mest.
Four of these projects had already started when the promoter discovered the possibility of receiving an ERDF subsidy; 28 Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 
Štirje od teh projektov so se že izvajali, ko je predlagatelj odkril možnost pridobitve subvencije ESRR; 28 Posebno poročilo št. 6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni?
29 (b) 41 promoters (20 %) said however that the project would not have been the same. 
29 (b) 41 predlagateljev (20 %) pa je navedlo, da projekt ne bi bil enak.
In 30 cases the scale or content had been modified (12 private and 18 public) whereas the subsidies had an influence on employment or the environment in 17 private and three public projects. 
V 30 primerih je bil spremenjen obseg ali vsebina (12 zasebnih in 18 javnih projektov), pri 17 zasebnih in treh javnih projektih pa so subvencije vplivale na zaposlovanje ali okolje.
The proportion of public grant in a project’s total cost had an impact on the responses of project promoters: the smaller the percentage of public support, the less the aid is seen as being crucial to the existence of the project (Figure 5). 
Delež, ki ga javna donacija predstavlja v skupnih stroških projekta, je vplival na odgovore predlagateljev projektov, in sicer manjši ko je bil delež javne podpore, manj se je pomoč razumela kot ključna za obstoj projekta (diagram 5).
Opinion also varies significantly according to the type of activity involved, e.g. 52 % of promoters of accomodation and catering projects said that their project would have taken place without a public grant. 
Mnenje se je pomembno razlikovalo tudi med vrstami dejavnosti, npr. 52 % predlagateljev projektov na področju nastanitvenih dejavnosti in gostinstva je navedlo, da bi bili njihovi projekti izvedeni tudi brez javne donacije.
For museum and historical monument projects or infrastructure and public amenities projects, 20 % gave this response whereas only 10 % of promoters in the area of holiday and leisure centres felt the same way. 
Za projekte v zvezi z muzeji in zgodovinskimi spomeniki ali infrastrukturo in javnimi objekti je tako odgovorilo 20 % predlagateljev projektov, medtem ko je na področju središč za počitnice in prosti čas to menilo le 10 % predlagateljev.
FIGURE 5 70% 14% 11% 5% 49% 18% 16% 16% 45% 19% 24% 12% 28% 22% 33% 17% CORRELATION BETWEEN THE PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF THE PUBLIC SUBSIDY AND THE WEIGHT OF THE GRANT 0 % Strongly disagree 40 % Disagree 60 % Agree 80 % Strongly agree 100 % Promoters' opinion about the statement: "The project would have taken place with no public subsidy?" > 75 % 51% -75% 26% -50% < 25 % 20 % Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 
DIAGRAM 5 70% 14% 11% 5% 49% 18% 16% 16% 45% 19% 24% 12% 28% 22% 33% 17% MEDSEBOJNA ODVISNOST MED OBČUTENO KORISTNOSTJO JAVNE SUBVENCIJE IN POMENOM DONACIJE 0 % Sploh se ne strinjam 40 % Ne strinjam se 60 % Strinjam se 80 % Zelo se strinjam 100 % 20 % Mnenje predlagateljev projektov o izjavi: „Projekt bi izvedli tudi brez javne subvencije“ > 75 % 51% -75% 26% -50% < 25 % Posebno poročilo št. 6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni?
ERDF GRANT IS PERCEIVED AS BEING RECOGNITION, BUT INCREASES THE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN 58. 
DONACIJA ESRR SE RAZUME KOT PRIZNANJE, VENDAR VEČA UPRAVNO OBREMENITEV 58.
The vast majority of promoters considered the ERDF grant as a recognition of the quality of their project (92 %) and its usefulness to the public (90 %). 
Velika večina predlagateljev projektov donacijo ESRR razume kot priznanje kakovosti njihovega projekta (92 %) in njegove koristnosti za javnost (90 %).
However, 42 % of promoters also said that receiving an ERDF grant increases considerably the administrative burden of their project. 
Vendar je 42 % predlagateljev projektov povedalo tudi, da se je upravna obremenitev njihovega projekta zaradi prejetja donacije ESRR precej povečala.
This opinion is more widespread amongst private promoters (56 %) than amongst public promoters (37 %). 
To mnenje je pogostejše med predlagatelji projektov v zasebnem sektorju (56 %) kot med tistimi v javnem (37 %).
The attitude of project promoters with regard to administrative burden also varies with the proportion of the ERDF grant in relation to the total cost of the project i.e. the smaller the ERDF grant is, relative to total cost, the more keenly is felt the administrative burden. 
Odnos do upravne obremenitve se razlikuje tudi glede na delež donacije ESRR pri kritju skupnih stroškov projekta, in sicer manjša ko je donacija ESRR v razmerju do skupnih stroškov, močneje se čuti upravna obremenitev.
Photo 11 — Renovated 13th century castle open to the public (France) © European Union Source: European Court of Auditors, December 2009. 
Fotografija 11 – Obnovljen grad iz 13. stoletja, odprt za javnost (Francija) © Evropska unija Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče, december 2009.
30 Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 
30 Posebno poročilo št. 6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni?
All of the projects had positive results in one form or other and the majority had successful results under several headings. 
Vsi projekti so imeli pozitivne rezultate v taki ali drugačni obliki in večina je imela uspešne rezultate pod več razdelki.
74 % were responsible for an increase in tourist activity, whilst 73 % created additional tourist capacity and 58 % of projects created or maintained 2 520 jobs, 23,5 % of which were held by women. 
74 % projektov je pripomoglo k povečanju turistične dejavnosti, 73 % projektov je ustvarilo dodatne turistične zmogljivosti, 58 % projektov pa je ustvarilo ali ohranilo 2 520 delovnih mest, od katerih so jih 23,5 % zasedale ženske.
44 % of projects had results in all three categories. 
44 % projektov je imelo rezultate v vseh treh kategorijah.
8 % of projects sampled did not achieve results in these areas but were found to have benefited the local economy or to help preserve elements of a region’s cultural, historic, artistic or environmental heritage (see paragraphs 19 and 32). 
8 % projektov v vzorcu ni doseglo rezultatov na teh področjih, vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da so koristili lokalnemu gospodarstvu ali pomagali ohraniti elemente kulturne, zgodovinske, umetnostne ali okoljske dediščine v regiji (glej odstavka 19 in 32).
Objectives were set for only 58 % of the projects in the sample. 
Cilji so bili določeni samo za 58 % projektov v vzorcu.
Where objectives had been set, they were achieved at 75 % for jobs creation or maintenance and 93 % for increasing tourism capacity. 
Pri projektih, za katere so bili določeni cilji, so bili ti cilji 75-odstotno doseženi pri ustvarjanju in ohranjanju delovnih mest ter 93-odstotno pri povečevanju turistične zmogljivosti.
9 % of the projects surveyed did not achieve any results in terms of jobs, even though they had been expected to do so. 
9 % projektov, ki so bili vključeni v anketo, ni doseglo nobenih rezultatov v obliki delovnih mest, čeprav se je to pričakovalo.
Alternately, 14 % of projects increased tourist capacity and 14 % increased jobs even though such objectives had not been set (see paragraph 34). 
14 % projektov je povečalo turistično zmogljivost in 14 % projektov je povečalo število delovnih mest, čeprav taki cilji niso bili določeni (glej odstavek 34).
42 % of the projects in the sample did not have objectives in terms of performance. 
42 % projektov v vzorcu ni imelo določenih smotrov v obliki doseganja rezultatov.
For those projects with objectives, in many cases targets and indicators had not been set up and the situation varied in respect of the projects visited. 
Pri projektih, za katere so smotri bili opredeljeni, pa pogosto niso bili določeni cilji in kazalniki, vendar se je stanje med projekti, ki so si jih revizorji ogledali, razlikovalo.
There was no monitoring of results for most of the projects sampled. 
Pri večini projektov v vzorcu se rezultati niso spremljali.
Managing authorities had linked the making of grant payments to the achievement of results in a small minority of projects sampled. 
Organi upravljanja so izplačilo donacije vezali na doseganje rezultatov le pri majhnem številu projektov v vzorcu.
Without the systematic setting of project objectives, establishment of targets and indicators and the subsequent monitoring and evaluation of results, it is difficult to assess the true performance of projects or the extent of European added value (see paragraphs 34 and 38 to 46). 
Brez sistematične določitve smotrov, ciljev in kazalnikov za projekte ter kasnejšega spremljanja in vrednotenja rezultatov je težko oceniti resnično uspešnost projektov ali obseg evropske dodane vrednosti (glej odstavke 34 in 38–46).
32 RECOMMENDATION 1 Managing authorities should ensure that suitable objectives, targets and indicators are established at the grant application and decision stages to enable: ο the selection of projects which are likely to be the most efficient; and ο the evaluation of their results. 
32 PRIPOROČILO 1 Organi upravljanja bi morali zagotoviti, da se v fazi vloge za donacijo in sklepa o donaciji določijo primerni smotri, cilji in kazalniki, da se omogoči: ο izbira projektov, za katere je verjetno, da bodo najučinkovitejši, in ο ovrednotenje njihovih rezultatov.
The Commission should encourage this practice. 
Komisija bi morala to spodbujati.
PROJECT RESULTS’ SUSTAINABILITY 62. 
TRAJNOST REZULTATOV PROJEKTOV 62.
Given that the majority of jobs created by mature projects still existed at the time of the audit and that the additional activity and capacity created by these projects had remained stable or increased slightly, it is likely that the results will be sustainable in the short to medium term. 
Ker je večina delovnih mest, ki so jih ustvarili zaključeni projekti, v času revizije še vedno obstajala in ker sta dodatna dejavnost in zmogljivost, ki so ju ustvarili, ostali na isti ravni ali pa sta se malo povečali, je verjetno, da bodo rezultati trajni v kratko-ali srednjeročnem obdobju.
However as only 25 % of projects were found to be financially viable, such sustainability is dependent upon current levels of public subvention for running costs continuing into the future. 
Ker pa je bilo samo za 25 % projektov ugotovljeno, da so finančno izvedljivi, je njihova trajnost odvisna od tega, ali bodo trenutne ravni javnih subvencij za tekoče stroške ostale enake tudi v prihodnosti.
INFLUENCE OF GRANTS 63. 
VPLIV DONACIJ 63.
According to project promoters, the receipt of public funding enabled 74 % of projects to be undertaken at all. 
Po navedbah predlagateljev projektov so javna sredstva omogočila izvedbo 74 % projektov.
In 20 % of cases, they declared that their projects would have gone ahead without grant aid but in a modified fashion. 
V 20 % primerov so navedli, da bi se projekti izvedli tudi brez donacije, vendar v spremenjeni obliki.
The lower the rate of assistance, the less its impact on the project. 
Nižja ko je raven pomoči, manjši je njen učinek na projekt.
In 6 % of cases, they said their projects would have been undertaken similarly without the grant (see paragraphs 55 to 57). 
V 6 % primerov so navedli, da bi bili projekti izvedeni tudi brez donacije (glej odstavke 55–57).
Whilst 92 % of the promoters perceived the ERDF grant as being a recognition of the quality of their project, 42 % of them felt that the ERDF subsidy process considerably increased their administrative burden. 
92 % predlagateljev projektov je donacijo ESRR razumelo kot priznanje kakovosti njihovega projekta, vendar jih je 42 % menilo, da je proces za pridobitev donacije ESRR precej povečal njihovo upravno obremenitev.
It was also noted that the lower the rate of assistance, the more the ERDF grant was perceived as being burdensome (see paragraph 58). 
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da se donacija ESRR občuti tem bolj obremenjujoča, čim nižja je raven pomoči (glej odstavek 58).
33 RECOMMENDATION 2 Managing authorities should ensure that project selection criteria include consideration of whether there is a real need for such funding for the project to be realised. 
33 PRIPOROČILO 2 Organi upravljanja bi morali zagotoviti, da izbirna merila za projekte vključujejo tudi razmislek o tem, ali so ta sredstva res potrebna za izvedbo projekta.
The potential impact of the grant on project design should also be taken into account, in addition to the overall impact of the project on economic growth and employment. 
Poleg splošnega učinka projekta na gospodarsko rast in zaposlovanje je treba upoštevati tudi morebiten učinek donacije na načrtovanje projekta.
RECOMMENDATION 3 The Commission should undertake an evaluation of aid in this sector, to consider the extent to which it forms a cost-effective means to support Member States to foster economic growth and to consider whether such support could be better targeted to this end. 
PRIPOROČILO 3 Komisija bi morala oceniti pomoč v tem sektorju in preučiti, koliko je ta pomoč stroškovno učinkovita za podpiranje držav članic pri spodbujanju gospodarske rasti ter ali bi bilo mogoče tako podporo bolje usmerjati. To poročilo je sprejel senat II, ki ga vodi g.
This report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mr Morten LEVYSOHN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 4 May 2011. 
Morten LEVYSOHN, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju 4. maja 2011.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 
Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik Posebno poročilo št. 6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni?
ANNEX I ERDF TOURISM FUNDING ALLOCATED BY MEMBER STATE FOR PHYSICAL INVESTMENT IN TOURISM — 2000–06 PROGRAMME PERIOD 34 Member State Number of operational programmes including tourism projects in each Member State ERDF amount for tourism (1 000 euro) Italy 21 1 448 519 Germany 17 649 206 France 23 467 106 Spain 20 427 888 Greece 15 384 360 United Kingdom 12 220 892 Austria 8 159 228 Portugal 6 150 326 Belgium 7 100 252 Poland 1 95 663 Netherlands 6 82 947 Lithuania 1 81 999 Hungary 1 74 018 Czech Republic 2 68 274 EU cross-border cooperation 23 64 513 EU interregional cooperation 22 50 904 Ireland 2 29 934 Finland 5 20 206 Estonia 1 16 247 Slovenia 2 13 803 Latvia 1 9 256 Malta 1 4 301 Cyprus 1 3 229 Total 198 4 623 071 Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 
PRILOGA I SREDSTVA ZA TURIZEM IZ ESRR, KI SO JIH DRŽAVE ČLANICE DODELILE ZA STVARNE NALOŽBE V TURIZEM – PROGRAMSKO OBDOBJE 2000–2006 34 Država članica Število operativnih programov vključno s turističnimi projekti v posameznih državah članicah Znesek iz ESRR za turizem (v 1 000 EUR) Italija 21 1 448 519 Nemčija 17 649 206 Francija 23 467 106 Španija 20 427 888 Grčija 15 384 360 Združeno kraljestvo 12 220 892 Avstrija 8 159 228 Portugalska 6 150 326 Belgija 7 100 252 Poljska 1 95 663 Nizozemska 6 82 947 Litva 1 81 999 Madžarska 1 74 018 Češka 2 68 274 Čezmejno sodelovanje EU 23 64 513 Medregionalno sodelovanje v EU 22 50 904 Irska 2 29 934 Finska 5 20 206 Estonija 1 16 247 Slovenija 2 13 803 Latvija 1 9 256 Malta 1 4 301 Ciper 1 3 229 Skupaj 198 4 623 071 Posebno poročilo št. 6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni?