natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
25 We carried out an analysis of 37 ESF OPs for the 2007-2013 programme period in order to assess the extent to which these criteria had been outlined. 
25. Analizirali smo 37 operativnih programov Evropskega socialnega sklada za programsko obdobje 2007–2013, da bi ocenili, do katere mere so je bilo to prikazano.
Observations 20 26 The initial budget of the OPs reviewed totalled 87.38 billion euro, of which 59.41 billion euro were allocated from the ESF. 
26. Skupni začetni proračun pregledanih operativnih programov je znašal 87,38 milijarde EUR.
The ESF allocation to education is 28.4 billion euro, i.e. 48 % of the total ESF support. 
Za izobraževanje je bilo iz Evropskega socialnega sklada dodeljenih 28,4 milijarde EUR, kar je 48 % celotne podpore iz tega sklada.
The examined OPs represent about 83 % of the total ESF allocation to education for the 2007-2013 programme period, which totalled to 33.7 billion euro (see paragraph 14). 27 Our analysis of the OPs examined showed that they generally included education objectives15. 
Za preučene operativne programe je bilo dodeljenih približno 83 % vseh sredstev, ki so bila v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 dodeljena za izobraževanje iz Evropskega socialnega sklada. Celotni znesek je znašal 33,7 milijarde EUR (glej odstavek 14). 27.
However, for some OPs, there were elements of the intervention logic which were not described and/or there were other shortcomings in the monitoring tools framework which are further detailed in the following two sections. 
Naša analiza preučenih operativnih programov je pokazala, da so običajno vključevali cilje za področje izobraževanja.15 Toda pri nekaterih operativnih programih so obstajali elementi intervencijske logike, ki niso bili opisani, in/ali so obstajale druge pomanjkljivosti v okviru orodij za spremljanje, ki so podrobneje opisane v naslednjih dveh delih.
An overview of the shortcomings is presented in Table 3. 
Pregled pomanjkljivosti je prikazan v tabeli 3.
Assessment of 2007-2013 ESF OPs: EU education objectives, intervention logic and tools for monitoring 15 Belgian Flanders OP did not specifically address any EU education objective, but nonetheless received ESF funds allocations under the education priority codes. 
21 15 V operativnem programu za belgijsko Flandrijo niso bili posebej zajeti nobeni cilji EU za področje izobraževanja, kljub temu pa so bila zanj dodeljena sredstva iz Evropskega socialnega sklada pod kodami za izobraževalne prioritete.
Table 3 Observations 21 Clear intervention logic was not always presented for the chosen objectives 28 OPs are strategic documents which support EU intervention. 
Skupno število primerov je vsota vseh ugotovljenih ciljev za področje izobraževanja v vseh 37 Za izbrane cilje ni bila vedno prikazana jasna intervencijska logika 28.
They cannot be expected to contain exhaustive information. 
Ni mogoče pričakovati, da bi vsebovali izčrpne informacije.
However, as the Commission has to assess and approve the OPs, we expect them to provide appropriate information, or at least references to other national documents, concerning the logic behind the EU intervention: description of the context, identification of the needs and of the actions necessary to meet the needs and remedy the initial weaknesses. 
Ker pa jih mora Komisija oceniti in potrditi, pričakujemo, da bodo v njih ustrezne informacije ali vsaj sklicevanje na druge nacionalne dokumente v zvezi z logiko, na kateri temelji intervencija EU: opis konteksta ter opredelitev potreb in ukrepov, potrebnih za izpolnjevanje teh potreb in odpravo začetnih slabosti.
This is the basis for allocating resources in an effective and efficient way. 
To je osnova za učinkovito in uspešno dodeljevanje virov.
29 Each time an EU education objective had been included in an examined OP, we assessed whether a clear intervention logic had been described. 
Pri vseh preučenih operativnih programih, ki so vključevali cilje EU za področje izobraževanja, smo ocenili, ali je bila opisana jasna intervencijska logika.
This logic should include a sound description of the context, followed by a detailed needs analysis, identifying the appropriate actions required. 
Ta logika bi morala vsebovati dober opis konteksta, ki mu sledi podrobna analiza potreb, na podlagi katere se opredelijo potrebni ukrepi.
While the applicable regulation for the 2007-2013 programme period did not require Member States to list their intended actions, this is considered good practice and was introduced as a requirement for the 2014-2020 programme period16. Hence, we considered this good practice as a criterion for assessing the 2007-2013 ESF OPs. 
Čeprav v uredbi, veljavni za programsko obdobje 2007–2013, ni zahtevano, da države članice naštejejo načrtovane ukrepe, to šteje kot dobra praksa in je bilo uvedeno kot zahteva za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.16 Zato smo to dobro prakso upoštevali kot merilo pri ocenjevanju operativnih programov Evropskega socialnega sklada za obdobje 2007–2013.
Table 3 summarises the cases in which the assessment showed that neither the OPs nor the related documents had presented the necessary information. 
V tabeli 3 so zbrani primeri, za katere je ocena pokazala, da potrebnih informacij ni bilo niti v operativnih programih niti v dokumentih, povezanih z njimi.
30 Most of the OPs examined had presented a description of the context with qualitative and quantitative data or at least some minimum level of information. However, in 12 % of the cases, the OPs did not provide any information concerning the context, i.e. the situation before the programme’s implementation. 
30. V večini preučenih operativnih programov so bili opisi konteksta s kvalitativnimi in kvantitativnimi podatki ali vsaj minimalnimi informacijami, toda v 12 % ni bilo v operativnih programih nobenih informacij o kontekstu, tj. položaju pred izvajanjem programa.
The absence of any description of the context implies that the needs can be identified only in general terms and therefore prevents the development of a clear strategy. 
Če ni opisa konteksta, to pomeni, da je mogoče potrebe ugotoviti samo na splošno, tako da ni mogoče pripraviti jasne strategije.
Moreover, we identified differences in the quality of the information provided by the OPs and related documents within a Member State (see Box 1). 
Še več, v eni od držav članic smo odkrili razlike v kakovosti informacij v operativnih programih in povezanih dokumentih (glej okvir 1).
Example of differences in the information provided by the OPs and related documents within a Member State In Italy, four ESF OPs included the objective of reducing the number of early school leavers. 
23 Okvir 1 – Primer razlik v informacijah v operativnih programih in povezanih dokumentih v eni od držav članic V Italiji je bil v štirih operativnih programih Evropskega socialnega sklada vključen cilj zmanjšanja števila oseb, ki zgodaj opustijo šolanje.
Among them, three OPs provided qualitative and quantitative information concerning the situation before the programmes’ implementation, while one OP did not present an adequate level of information in this regard. 
V treh od njih so bile navedene kvalitativne in kvantitativne informacije o položaju pred izvajanjem programov, v enem pa v zvezi s tem ni bilo informacij na ustrezni ravni. 31.
Observations 22 31 Table 3 indicates that a needs analysis was found to be lacking in 22 % of the cases. 
Podatki v tabeli 3 kažejo, da za 22 % primerov ni analize potreb.
Our analysis also found that while a needs analysis with qualitative or quantitative data was present in about a fifth of the cases, almost half of these referred only to the need to achieve the EU target without a detailed underlying analysis. 
Pri naši analizi smo tudi ugotovili, da je bila za približno petino primerov sicer opravljena analiza potreb s kvalitativnimi in kvantitativnimi podatki, vendar jih je skoraj polovica obravnavala samo potrebo po doseganju ožjega cilja EU, ne da bi bila opravljena podrobna analiza, povezana s tem.
32 Finally, we found that most of the OPs examined provided examples of actions planned to achieve the objectives. However, in 13 % of the cases, the OPs did not provide any example of actions that could be taken to achieve the related objective. 
Ugotovili smo tudi, da je večina preučenih operativnih programov vsebovala primere ukrepov, načrtovanih za doseganje ciljev, razen 13 % operativnih programov, ki takih primerov niso vsebovali.
Inadequate tools for monitoring performance Absence of outcome indicators and baselines, milestones and targets hampers effective monitoring and evaluation of the overall ESF performance 33 We have previously highlighted several times in other reports17 that the Commission was in a difficult position to adequately monitor overall ESF performance during the 2007-2013 programme period. 
Neustrezna orodja za spremljanje uspešnosti Neobstoj kazalnikov izidov, izhodiščnih vrednosti, mejnikov in ožjih ciljev ovira uspešno spremljanje in vrednotenje splošne uspešnosti Evropskega socialnega sklada 33. V drugih poročilih17 smo že večkrat poudarili, da je bilo za Komisijo v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 težko ustrezno spremljati splošno uspešnost Evropskega socialnega sklada.
The 2007-2013 regulatory framework required Member States to define specific output and result indicators on outcomes as well as quantitative targets at the level of priority axes for each OP. 
Regulativni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 je od držav članic zahteval, da za vsak operativni program na ravni prednostnih osi opredelijo posamezne kazalnike izložkov in rezultatov za izide ter kvantitativne ožje cilje.
However, in relation to common indicators it was only mandatory to report the ones in relation to participants and/or participations18. During the 2007-2013 period, there were no common result indicators on outcomes required, which creates problems for aggregating the monitoring information on results. 
V zvezi s skupnimi kazalniki pa je bilo obvezno poročati samo o kazalnikih glede udeležencev in/ali udeležbe.18 V obdobju 2007–2013 se skupni kazalniki rezultatov za izide niso zahtevali, zaradi česar je prišlo do problemov pri združevanju podatkov o spremljanju za rezultate.
Weaknesses in monitoring also have an impact on the capacity of the Commission and Member States to carry out evaluations. 
Slabosti pri spremljanju so vplivale tudi na sposobnost Komisije in držav članic za izvajanje vrednotenj.
18 Annex XXIII to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 of 8 December 2006 setting out rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund (OJ L 371, 27.12.2006, p. 
34. Komisija v strateškem poročilu iz leta 2013 omenja, da so imeli operativni programi za obdobje 2007–2013 dobre mehanizme za sledenje črpanja sredstev, mehanizmi za 17 24 18 Priloga XXIII k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št.
In addition, the final synthesis report by external Expert Evaluation Network on the main ESF achievements of the 2007-2013 programme period highlighted that ‘although comprehensive data are available on outputs for each of the Member States, the position for results is much less favourable. 
določanje, spremljanje in vrednotenje ciljev pa so bili šibkejši.19 Poleg tega je bilo v končnem zbirnem poročilu mreže zunanjih strokovnih ocenjevalcev o glavnih dosežkih Evropskega socialnega sklada za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 poudarjeno, da so za vsako državo članico sicer na voljo izčrpni podatki o izložkih, stanje v zvezi z rezultati pa je veliko manj ugodno.
Even for three key results — job entry, qualifications achieved and self-employment — it was not possible to obtain the absolute numbers on a consistent basis for a number of Member States. 
Za več držav članic ni bilo mogoče redno pridobivati absolutnih številk niti za tri ključne rezultate, tj. zaposlitev, pridobljene kvalifikacije in samozaposlitev.
In the absence of absolute numbers it is not possible to generate aggregate figures across Member States for the results associated with ESF supported interventions’20. 
Ker absolutne številke niso na voljo, ni mogoče izračunati zbirnih številk za vse države članice za rezultate, povezane z intervencijami, ki jih podpira ESS.20 35.
35 Our analysis of the examined OPs considered two aspects relating to monitoring tools: whether there was any quantification of the objective and whether any indicator had been set for measuring the achievement of the objective. 
Pri analizi preučenih operativnih programov smo obravnavali dva vidika v zvezi z orodji za spremljanje: ali je obstajala količinska opredelitev cilja in ali je bil določen kak kazalnik za merjenje doseganja cilja.
Table 3 shows that 22 % of the cases did not have any quantification of the objective and 21 % did not include any indicator for measuring the achievement of the objective. 
Iz tabele 3 je razvidno, da pri 22 % primerov cilji niso bili kvantificirani, za 21 % pa ni bil določen noben kazalnik za merjenje doseganja cilja.
Our analysis also found that around half of the OPs presented both output and outcome indicators, with baselines and target values, while in 31 % of cases, one of the two types of indicators was missing. 
Pri analizi smo tudi ugotovili, da so bili v približno polovici operativnih programov prikazani kazalniki izložkov in izidov z izhodiščnimi in ciljnimi vrednostmi, pri 31 % pa je manjkala ena od obeh vrst kazalnikov.
36 Baselines, milestones and targets are essential to efficiently assess and monitor the performance of the OPs. They provide the management with the tools required to properly assess the extent to which the objectives are being met, and make it possible to initiate corrective measures including reprogramming financial resources in the event of inadequate performance. 
Izhodiščne vrednosti, mejniki in ožji cilji so bistveni za učinkovito ocenjevanje in spremljanje uspešnosti operativnih programov, saj so to orodja, ki jih poslovodstvo potrebuje za pravilno ocenjevanje stopnje doseganja ciljev in ki mu omogočajo uvedbo popravljalnih ukrepov, vključno z reprogramiranjem finančnih virov, kadar uspešnost ni ustrezna.
The fact that goals are not set in measurable terms hampers the evaluation and reporting of the ESF’s performance. 
Če niso določeni merljivi smotri, to ovira vrednotenje uspešnosti Evropskega socialnega sklada in poročanje o njej.
19 COM(2013) 210 final of 18 April 2013 ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — Cohesion policy: Strategic report 2013 on programme implementation 2007-2013’, p.12. 
25 19 20 COM(2013) 210 final z dne 18. aprila 2013 „Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Kohezijska politika: Strateško poročilo 2013 o izvajanju programov v obdobju 2007–2013”, str. 12.
20 ESF Expert Evaluation Network — Final synthesis report: Main ESF achievements, 2007-2013, 26.3.2014, p. 
ESF Expert Evaluation Network, Final synthesis report: Main ESF achievements, 2007–2013, 26. marec 2014, str.
Observations 24 38 Moreover, this indicator does not provide a clear distinction between individual participants and participation. 
38. Poleg tega ta kazalnik ne ločuje jasno med udeleženci kot posamezniki in udeležbo.
The 2014 annual activity report of the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion mentions an average of 11.2 million participants per year for the 2007-2013 programme period. 
Generalni direktorat za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2014 omenja povprečno 11,2 milijona udeležencev na leto za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
However, it also specifies that these figures are at risk of being overstated because ‘Member States report on the number of participations to ESF projects and therefore one participant could take part in several actions’21. Insufficient link between financial reprogramming of operational programmes and targets set 39 Member States should consider whether there is a need to review the initially established OP objectives in the light of an updated EU education strategic policy. 
Omenja pa tudi, da obstaja tveganje, da so te številke previsoke, ker države članice poročajo o številu udeležb v projektih Evropskega socialnega sklada in je zato mogoče, da isti udeleženec sodeluje v več ukrepih.21 Finančno reprogramiranje operativnih programov in opredeljeni ožji cilji niso dovolj povezani 39. Pri posodobitvi strateške politike EU za izobraževanje bi morale države članice presoditi, ali je treba pregledati prvotno določene cilje operativnih programov.
Where this is the case, there should be a reassessment of the targets previously set and the required financial allocations. 40 An updated strategic framework on education was adopted by the Council during the 2007-2013 programme period (see paragraphs 6 and 7), and although it was not mandatory to modify OPs in that regard, we checked whether the 37 OPs reviewed needed to be updated accordingly. 
V takem primeru bi bilo treba ponovno opredeliti prej določene ožje cilje in potrebne dodelitve finančnih sredstev. 40. Svet je v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 sprejel posodobljen strateški okvir za izobraževanje (glej odstavka 6 in 7).
41 While 35 out of the 37 OPs examined had been modified throughout the programme period, only two included modifications concerning education objectives to ensure that the OP was aligned with the Europe 2020 strategy (see Annex VI). 
Čeprav je bilo v programskem obdobju 35 od 37 operativnih programov spremenjenih, sta samo dva vključevala spremembe v zvezi s cilji za področje izobraževanja, s katerimi naj bi se zagotovila usklajenost operativnega programa s strategijo Evropa 2020 (glej Prilogo VI).
However, our assessment showed that, in general, the education objectives included in the OPs examined had already been in line with the updated EU education objectives. 
Naša ocena pa je pokazala, da so bili cilji za področje izobraževanja, vključeni v preučene 21 26 Letno poročilo o dejavnostih za leto 2014, Generalni direktorat za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje, Ares(2015)1 425 867.
42 Indicators, or their target values (and in some cases the baselines), related to the education objectives, had been modified in 27 OPs and the majority of these had their financial allocation to education modified. 
Kazalniki ali njihove ciljne vrednosti (ter v nekaterih primerih izhodiščne vrednosti), povezani s cilji za področje izobraževanja, so bili spremenjeni v 27 operativnih programih in za večino od njih so bila spremenjena tudi sredstva, dodeljena za izobraževanje.
For some OPs, information concerning the reprogramming including resetting of targets was available. 
Za nekatere operativne programe so bile na voljo informacije o reprogramiranju, vključno s ponovno določitvijo ožjih ciljev.
For example, the Slovak OP22 provided a detailed analysis, including the formula for calculating the target values of indicators. 
Na primer, slovaški operativni program22 je vseboval podrobno analizo, vključno s formulo za izračun ciljnih vrednosti kazalnikov.
However, for the majority of the modified OPs, clear explanations about the implications of the change in the financial allocations for the related target values were missing. 
Toda pri večini spremenjenih operativnih programov so manjkala jasna pojasnila o tem, kakšne posledice bo imela sprememba pri dodelitvah sredstev za ustrezne ciljne vrednosti.
Observations 25 43 For two OPs in Italy, the financial allocations to education were reduced by 9 million euro and 30 million euro (respectively 8 % and 10 % of the initial budget), without either modifying the indicators and their target values or providing an adequate justification23. For the second OP for which the initial budget was reduced by 10 % (Campania), almost all of the initial targets had already been overachieved at the time of the modification of the OP, having spent only around half of the initial budget. 
43. Pri dveh operativnih programih v Italiji so bila dodeljena sredstva zmanjšana za 9 oziroma 30 milijonov EUR (za 8 % oziroma 10 % prvotnega proračuna), ne da bi bili spremenjeni kazalniki in njihove ciljne vrednosti in ne da bi bila ta odločitev ustrezno utemeljena.23 Pri drugem od teh operativnih programov, za katerega je bil prvotni proračun zmanjšan za 10 % (Kampanija), so bili v času njegove spremembe že skoraj vsi prvotni ožji cilji preseženi, porabljena pa je bila samo približno polovica prvotnega proračuna, kar kaže, da se vidikom uspešnosti ni posvečalo veliko pozornosti.
This illustrates that limited attention was given to performance aspects. 44 Where required, not updating the target values when modifying the financial allocations or updating them inconsistently weakens the validity of the indicators and their usefulness. 
44. Če se ciljne vrednosti ob spremembi dodeljenih sredstev ne spremenijo, čeprav bi jih bilo treba spremeniti, ali so njihove spremembe nedosledne, se zaradi tega zmanjša veljavnost kazalnikov in njihova uporabnost.
Target values, if not carefully established, impede the assessment of the effectiveness of a programme. Performance of examined projects could not be systematically demonstrated 45 Projects supported through ESF OPs are expected to deliver results which fit into the OP strategy designed to reach one of the EU education objectives. 
Ciljne vrednosti, ki niso pazljivo določene, ovirajo ocenjevanje uspešnosti programov. Uspešnosti preučenih projektov ni bilo mogoče sistematično prikazati 45. Projekti, ki prejmejo podporo v okviru operativnih programov Evropskega socialnega sklada, naj bi dosegli rezultate, ki ustrezajo strategiji operativnih programov, načrtovani za 22 23 OP št.
Responsibility for the sound financial management of co-financed activities rests with the managing authority of each OP24. The managing authorities should first make sure that the grant applications include relevant quantified objectives and indicators and assess the adherence of the project to the OP strategy and the adequacy of the likely results. 
Za dobro finančno poslovodenje sofinanciranih dejavnosti so odgovorni organi upravljanja posameznih operativnih programov.24 Organi upravljanja bi se morali najprej prepričati, da vloge za nepovratna sredstva vsebujejo ustrezne kvantificirane cilje in kazalnike, ter oceniti usklajenost projekta s strategijo operativnega programa in ustreznost verjetnih rezultatov.
46 For the purpose of the audit, we examined 15 projects, i.e. three projects in each of the five Member States visited (see paragraph 21), that, according to the managing authorities, had contributed positively to achieving at least one EU education objective. 
46. Pri reviziji smo preučili 15 projektov, tj. po tri projekte v vsaki od petih obiskanih držav članic (glej odstavek 21), ki so po navedbah organov upravljanja pozitivno prispevali k doseganju vsaj enega cilja EU za področje izobraževanja.
For each project, we examined to what extent it could be demonstrated that the results achieved had contributed to the education objectives set out in the OP. 
Pri vsakem projektu smo preučili, do katere stopnje je mogoče dokazati, da so doseženi rezultati prispevali k ciljem za področje izobraževanja, določenim v operativnem programu.
Figure 4 provides additional information on the location, scope, cost and participation in the projects examined. 
Na sliki 4 so dodatne informacije o lokaciji, obsegu, stroških in udeležbi za preučene projekte.
24 Article 60 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 
28 24 Člen 60 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št.