natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The ex-post declarations for 2008 were due on 30 April 2009 but only six declarations were received on time; ANNEX 7.4 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS FOR EDUCATION AND CITIZENSHIP The comparison with 2008 (six declarations received on time) shows only a little progress in terms of timeliness of the declarations and reports. 
Naknadne izjave za leto 2008 bi morale biti predložene do 30. aprila 2009, vendar je bilo pravočasno prejetih le šest izjav, PRILOGA 7.4 NADALJNJE UKREPANJE PO PREJŠNJIH OPAŽANJIH ZA IZOBRAŽEVANJE IN DRŽAVLJANSTVO Primerjava z letom 2008 (šest pravočasno prejetih izjav) kaže le malo napredka pri pravočasni predložitvi izjav in poročil.
The Commission welcomes the Court's analysis that its updated guidance takes into account the Court's recommendation of the previous year. 
Komisijo veseli analiza Sodišča, da njena posodob­ ljena navodila upoštevajo priporočila Sodišča za prejšnje leto.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 173 Court observation Action taken Court analysis Commission reply — while the guidance for national agencies is well-developed, both in legislative terms and in the ‘Guide for national agencies implementing the Lifelong Learning Programme’ issued by the Commission, this is not the case for the national authorities. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 173 Opažanja Sodišča Sprejeti ukrepi Analiza Sodišča Odgovor Komisije — medtem ko so smernice za nacionalne agencije dobro pripravljene z zakonodajnega vidika in v Komisijinem vodniku za nacionalne agencije, ki izvajajo program Vseživljenjsko učenje, to za nacionalne organe ne velja.
Though guidance has been issued by the Commission clarifying the responsibilities, there is no sufficiently detailed prescriptive guidance containing specific procedures for the authorities to follow. 
Komisija je sicer izdala smernice, v katerih je pojasnila pristojnosti, vendar dovolj podrobnih predpisujočih smernic, ki bi vsebovale specifične postopke, ki jih morajo upoštevati pristojni organi, ni.
According to the AAR 2009 of DG EAC: ‘As a follow-up to the Court's recommendations, updated guidance for the National Authorities has been worked out and communicated at the end of 2009. 
Kot navaja letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD EAC za leto 2009, so bile v okviru nadaljnjega ukrepanja na podlagi priporočil Sodišča pripra­ vljene posodobljene smernice za nacionalne organe, ki so jim bile poslane konec leta 2009.
On the basis of these revised guidelines, coupled with a training seminar for National Authorities on 2 March 2010, it is expected that the 2009 Declarations of Assurance will be of better and of more homo­ genous quality than in the past years.’ (p. 
Na podlagi teh posodobljenih smernic in usposabljanja za nacionalne organe, ki je bilo 2. marca 2010, se pričakuje, da bo kako­ vost izjav o zanesljivosti za leto 2009 boljša in bolj enotna kot v preteklih letih (str.
(2008 Annual Report, paragraphs 9.16, 9.19 to 9.21 and 9.33) 2. 
(Letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavki 9.16, 9.19 do 9.21 in 9.33.) 2.
Weaknesses in the Commission’s assessment process of ex-ante and ex-post declarations for LLP The Court found that the application of procedure for both the ex-ante declarations for the period 2007 to 2013 and the ex-post declaration for 2007 provided limited assurance for the quality of the management of the expenditure. 
Slabosti v Komisijinem postopku ocenjevanja predhodnih in naknadnih izjav za program Vseživljenjsko učenje Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je uporaba postopka za predhodne izjave za obdobje 2007–2013 in naknadne izjave za leto 2007 nudila omejeno zagotovilo glede kakovosti upra­ vljanja odhodkov.
The Commission’s assessment was based on a desk review of systems and controls and systems monitoring visits to 11 countries in 2008. 
Komisijina ocena je temeljila na doku­ mentacijskem pregledu sistemov in kontrol ter obiskih zaradi spremljanja sistemov v 11 državah v letu 2008.
However, only in some cases did the Commission verify the reality and the quality of the primary and secondary controls referred to in the yearly declarations and the information presented in the yearly reports. 
Vendar je Komisija le v nekaterih primerih preverila resnič­ nost in kakovost primarnih in sekundarnih kontrol, na katere se sklicujejo letne izjave ter informacije, predsta­ vljene v letnih poročilih.
According to the AAR 2009 of DG EAC: ‘In line with its Strategic Supervision Policy, DG EAC has already reinforced the on-the-spot visits that focus on the existence and implemen­ tation of management procedures and checks as described by Member States. 
Kot je navedeno v letnem poročilu o dejavno­ stih GD EAC za leto 2009, je GD EAC v skladu s svojo politiko strateškega nadziranja že okrepil obiske na kraju samem, kjer se prever­ jajo predvsem obstoj in izvajanje upravljavskih postopkov ter pregledi, ki so jih opisale države članice.
The 2010 audit plan will continue in this perspective’. 
Tudi načrt revizij za leto 2010 je pripravljen v tem duhu.
In 2009, the number of financial audits was lower than in 2008, though DG EAC performed additional systems audits in National Authorities. 
V letu 2009 je bilo izvedenih manj revizij raču­ novodskih izkazov kot v letu 2008, vendar je GD EAC izvedel dodatne revizije sistemov v nacionalnih organih.
Monitoring visits to National Agencies increased in 2009. 
Število obiskov zaradi spremljanja v nacionalnih agencijah se je v letu 2009 povečalo.
The decrease in the number of financial audits in 2009 compared to 2008 is explained by the good results of similar audits in 2008, which have shown low error rates. 
Zmanjšanje števila finančnih revizij v letu 2009 v primerjavi z letom 2008 se lahko pojasni z dobrimi rezultati podobnih revizij v letu 2008, iz katerih so bile razvidne nizke stopnje napak.
It is recommended that the Commission engage in closer supervision of the annual ex-post declaration process with direct verification that the controls described are adequate and fully applied. 
Zato Sodišče Komisiji priporoča, da začne natančneje nadzirati postopek naknadne letne izjave z neposrednim preverjanjem, ali so opisane kontrole ustrezne in ali se v celoti uporabljajo.
In 2009 DG EAC conducted five financial audits of nine decentralised action agreements 2000-2006 or 2007-2008 (against 14 financial audits in eight countries performed in 2008) and 11 system audit visits to National Authorities. 
GD EAC je v letu 2009 izvedel pet revizij raču­ novodskih izkazov za devet sporazumov o ukrepih, ki se izvajajo v okviru decentralizira­ nega upravljanja, za obdobje 2000–2006 ali 2007–2008 (v primerjavi s 14 revizijami raču­ novodskih izkazov v osmih državah, izvedenimi v letu 2008) in 11 revizij sistemov v nacio­ nalnih organih.
It has also performed 58 moni­ toring visits to National Agencies (against 41 in 2008). 
Izvedel je tudi 58 obiskov zaradi spremljanja v nacionalnih agencijah (v primerjavi z 41 v letu 2008).
These audits cannot be seen isolated from super­ visory control visits and systems monitoring carried out by DG EAC services in 2009. 
Teh revizij se ne da obravnavati ločeno od nadzornih kontrolnih obiskov in spremljanja sistemov, ki so jih službe GD za izobraževanje in kulturo izvedle leta 2009.
EN 174 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 Court observation Action taken Court analysis Commission reply Based on its assessment of both the ex-ante and ex-post declarations, the yearly reports from the national agencies and the results of its monitoring visits to the national agencies and national authorities, the Commission has established a list of qualifications to be remedied by national agencies and national authorities. 
SL 174 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 Opažanja Sodišča Sprejeti ukrepi Analiza Sodišča Odgovor Komisije Komisija je na podlagi svoje ocene predhodnih in naknadnih izjav, letnih poročil nacionalnih agencij ter rezultatov svojih obiskov zaradi spremljanja v nacionalnih agencijah in nacionalnih organih pripravila seznam pridržkov, za katere morajo nacionalne agencije in nacio­ nalni organi sprejeti popravne ukrepe.
A continued follow-up of qualifications, in the form of more thorough monitoring visits, and a closer supervision by the Commission of the annual ex-post declaration procedure is needed to provide assurance for the coming years that national agencies meet the requirements in respect of management and control of expenditure. 
Da bi se v prihod­ njih letih pridobilo zagotovilo, da nacionalne agencije izpolnjujejo zahteve za upravljanje in kontrolo odhodkov, je potrebno stalno nadaljnje ukrepanje po pridržkih, zato je treba izvesti temeljitejše obiske z namenom spremljanja, Komisija pa mora natančneje nadzirati postopek naknadne letne izjave.
(2008 Annual Report, paragraphs 9.22 to 9.24, 9.25 and 9.34) 3. 
(Letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavki 9.22 do 9.24, 9.25 in 9.34.) 3.
These audits included the review of routine checks of final reports, desk checks of supporting documents, on-the-spot checks during action and financial on-the-spot checks after receipt of the final report. the results of the financial audits of projects, carried out by a private audit firm on behalf of the Commission, show an average error in the audited contracts of 0,01 % for LLP. 
Delno uspešne naknadne kontrole v GD EAC V letnem poročilu o dejavnostih GD EAC za leto 2008 je navedeno, da rezultati revizij računovodskih izkazov projektov, ki jih je za Komisijo izvedlo zasebno revizijsko podjetje, kažejo, da povprečna napaka v revidiranih pogodbah za program Vseživljenjsko učenje znaša 0,01 %.
However, an error rate calculated on the projects closed during the year would be much higher. 
Vendar bi bila stopnja napake, izračunana za projekte, zaključene med letom, veliko višja.
Furthermore, as these audits were mainly carried out at the level of the national agency, which does not normally receive all justifying documents, they do not cover all eligibility criteria. 
Poleg tega te revizije ne zajemajo vseh meril za upravičenost, saj so bile v glavnem izvedene na ravni nacionalnih agencij, ki običajno ne prejmejo vseh dokazil.
(2008 Annual Report, paragraph 9.26) 
(Letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavek 9.26.)
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 175 CHAPTER 8 Economic and Financial Affairs TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 8.1 Specific assessment in the context of the Statement of Assurance 8.2-8.34 Introduction 8.2-8.9 Specific characteristics of the policy group Audit scope and approach Regularity of transactions Effectiveness of systems Ex-ante controls Audit certification Ex-post controls Reliability of Commission management representations Conclusions and recommendations Results of the Audit of the Guarantee Fund for External Actions Results of the Audit of the ECSC in Liquidation 8.3-8.8 8.9 8.10-8.12 8.13-8.27 8.15-8.18 8.19-8.21 8.22-8.27 8.28-8.29 8.30-8.34 8.35-8.39 8.40-8.44 Paragraph 
0,65 %. ohranja svoje opažanje o revizijskih omejitvah. SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 175 POGLAVJE 8 Gospodarske in finančne zadeve KAZALO Pregled Posebna ocena v okviru izjave o zanesljivosti Uvod Posebne značilnosti skupine politik Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Pravilnost transakcij Uspešnost sistemov Predhodne kontrole Revizijsko potrjevanje Naknadne kontrole Zanesljivost poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije Zaključki in priporočila Rezultati revizije Jamstvenega sklada za zunanje ukrepe Rezultati revizije ESPJ v likvidaciji Odstavek 8.1 8.2–8.34 8.2–8.9 8.3–8.8 8.9 8.10–8.12 8.13–8.27 8.15–8.18 8.19–8.21 8.22–8.27 8.28–8.29 8.30–8.34 8.35–8.39 8.40–8.44
Chapter8consistsofthreeparts.Firstitcontainsthe specific assessment of policy group Economic and Financial Affairs in the context of the Statement of Assurance (see paragraphs 8.2 to 8.34). This is followed by the results of the recurrent audits on the Guarantee Fund for External Actions (see paragraphs 8.35 to 8.39) and the European Coal and Steel Community in Liquidation (see paragraphs 8.40 to 8.44). 
Najprej je pred­ stavljena posebna ocena skupine politik gospodarske in fina­ nčne zadeve v okviru izjave o zanesljivosti (glej odstavke 8.2 do 8.34), sledijo ji rezultati periodičnih revizij Jamstvenega sklada za zunanje ukrepe (glej odstavke 8.35 do 8.39) ter Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo v likvidaciji (glej odstavke 8.40 do 8.44), nazadnje pa je predstavljeno nadaljnje ukrepanje na podlagi opažanj iz prejšnjih let (glej Prilogo 8.4).
SPECIFIC ASSESSMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE Introduction 8.2. This part presents the Court’s specific assessment of the policy group Economic and Financial Affairs, which comprises the following policy areas: 01 — Economic and Financial Affairs, 02 — Enterprise, 03 — Competition, 12 — Internal Market, and 20 — Trade. 
POSEBNA OCENA V OKVIRU IZJAVE O ZANE­ SLJIVOSTI Uvod 8.2 V tem delu je predstavljena posebna ocena Sodišča o skupini politik gospodarske in finančne zadeve, ki vsebuje naslednja področja politik: 01 – gospodarske in finančne zadeve, 02 – podjetništvo, 03 – konkurenca, 12 – notranji trg ter 20 – trgovina.
Key information on the activities covered and the spending in 2009 is provided in Table 8.1. 
Ključne informacije o zajetih dejavnostih in porabi v letu 2009 so predstavljene v tabeli 8.1.
Specific characteristics of the policy group 8.3. Themainprogrammesinthispolicygroup,accounting for almost 83 % (or 605 million euro) of the group’s total operational expenditure, are financed by 01 — Economic and Financial Affairs and 02 — Enterprise policy areas. 
Posebne značilnosti skupine politik 8.3 Glavniprogramivtejskupinipolitik,kijimjename­ njenih skoraj 83 % (ali 605 milijonov EUR) skupnih opera­ tivnih odhodkov za skupino, se financirajo s področij politike 01 – gospodarske in finančne zadeve in 02 – podjetništvo.
These programmes are: (a) the Seventh and Sixth Framework Programmes for research and technological development (FP7, FP6) (222 million euro); (b) the funding of EU agencies (1) (116 million euro); (c) the Guarantee Fund for external actions (see paragraphs 8.35 to 8.39) (92 million euro); and (d) the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) and the Multiannual Programme for Enterprise and Entrepreneurship (MAP) (175 million euro). _____________ (1) The two EU agencies are the European Chemicals agency (ECHA) and the European Medicines agency (EMA). 
Ti programi so: (a) sedmi in šesti okvirni program za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (7. OP, 6. OP) (222 milijonov EUR); (b) financiranje agencij EU (1) (116 milijonov EUR); (c) Jamstveni sklad za zunanje ukrepe (glej odstavke 8.35 do 8.39) (92 milijonov EUR) in (d) okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije (CIP) ter večletni program za podjetja in podjetništvo (MAP) (175 milijonov EUR). _____________ (1) Ti agenciji EU sta Evropska agencija za kemikalije (ECHA) in Evropska agencija za zdravila (EMA).
The Court issues annual audit reports concerning both agencies. 
Sodišče za obe objavlja letna revizijska poročila.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 177 Table 8.1 — Economic and financial affairs — Key information Policy area Description Payments 2009 Economic and Financial Affairs Administrative expenditure (1) Economic and monetary union International economic and financial affairs Financial operations and instruments 63 13 17 235 328 Enterprise Administrative expenditure (1) Competitiveness, industrial policy, innovation and entrepreneurship Internal market for goods and sectoral policies Cooperation — space and security 114 71 145 228 558 Competition Administrative expenditure (1) Cartels, anti-trust and liberalisation 91 3 94 Internal Market Administrative expenditure (1) Policy strategy and coordination for the Direc­ torate-General for the Internal Market 58 8 66 Trade Administrative expenditure (1) Trade policy 65 12 77 Budget Title (million euro) Management Mode Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct/joint management with EIF/centralised indirect via EIF Centralised direct Centralised direct/centralised indirect via EACI Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct/joint management with IO 1 2 3 12 20 Total administrative expenditure (1) Total operational expenditure (consisting of): — advances (2) — interim/final payments (3) Total payments for the year Total commitments for the year 391 732 273 459 1 123 1 373 (1) The audit of administrative expenditure is reported in Chapter 9. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 177 Tabela 8.1 — Gospodarske in finančne zadeve – ključne informacije Področje politike Opis Plačila za leto 2009 Gospodarske in finančne zadeve upravni odhodki (1) ekonomska in monetarna unija mednarodne ekonomske in finančne zadeve finančni posli in instrumenti 63 13 17 235 328 Podjetništvo upravni odhodki (1) konkurenčnost, industrijska politika, inovacije in podjetništvo notranji trg blaga in sektorske politike sodelovanje – Vesolje in varnost 114 71 145 228 558 Konkurenca upravni odhodki (1) karteli, preprečevanje monopolov in liberalizacija 91 3 94 Notranji trg upravni odhodki (1) strategija in usklajevanje politike za GD Notranji trg 58 8 66 Trgovina upravni odhodki (1) trgovinska politika 65 12 77 Proračuns­ ki naslov 1 2 3 12 20 (v milijonih EUR) Način upravljanja neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano/skupno upravljanje prek EIF/ posredno centra­ lizirano prek EIF neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano/posredno centralizirano prek EACI neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano/skupno upravljanje prek mednarodnih organi­ zacij Upravni odhodki skupaj (1) Operativni odhodki skupaj (od tega): — predplačila (2) — vmesna/končna plačila (3) Plačila za leto skupaj Obveznosti za leto skupaj 391 732 273 459 1 123 1 373 (1) Revizija upravnih odhodkov je predstavljena v poglavju 9.
(2) Advances under the Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2013) amounted to 100 million euro. 
(2) Predplačila v okviru 7. okvirnega programa (2007–2013) so znašala 100 milijonov EUR.
(3) Interim/Final payments under the Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2013) and the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) amounted to 9 million euro and 32 million euro respectively. 
(3) Vmesna/končna plačila v okviru 7. okvirnega programa (2007–2013) so znašala 9 milijonov EUR, v okviru 6. okvirnega programa (2002–2006) pa 32 milijonov EUR.
Source: Annual Accounts 2009. 
Vir: Računovodski izkazi, 2008.
EN 178 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 8.4. The CIP and MAP programmes financed by the 01 — Economic and Financial Affairs policy area aim to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) through Community financial instruments operated on behalf of the Commission by the European Investment Fund (EIF) which facilitate access to finance. 
SL 178 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 8.4 Cilj programov CIP in MAP, ki se financirata s področja politike 01 – gospodarske in finančne zadeve, je podpora malim in srednje velikim podjetjem (MSP) s finančnimi instru­ menti Skupnosti, ki jih za Komisijo upravlja Evropski inve­ sticijski sklad (EIF) in lajšajo dostop do financiranja.
The payments made by the Commission to the EIF relate to the transfer of the funds to fiduciary accounts which are used by the EIF to implement the programmes. 
Plačila EIF-u, ki jih izvrši Komisija, so povezana s prenosom sredstev na fiduciarne račune, ki jih EIF uporablja za izvajanje programov.
The risk of illegal or irregular payments made by the Commission is low. 8.5. 
Tveganje, da Komisija izvrši nezakonita ali nepra­ vilna plačila, je majhno. 8.5 Cilj 7.
TheaimoftheFP7programmewithinthescopeof this policy area is to support actions carried out in the area of space and security research whereas, FP6 supports actions which promote technological innovation, the exploitation of research results and the setting-up of technology businesses within the Community and all its regions. 
OP na tem področju politike je podpirati ukrepe na področju raziskav vesolja in varnosti, v okviru 6. OP pa se podpirajo ukrepi za spodbujanje tehnoloških inovacij, izkori­ ščanje rezultatov raziskav ter vzpostavljanje tehnoloških podjetij znotraj Skupnosti in v vseh njenih regijah.
The aim of the CIP programme financed by the 02 — Enterprise policy is to foster actions which promote the competitiveness of enter­ prises and in particular SMEs, through innovation. 8.6. 
Cilj programa CIP, ki se financira s področja politike 02 – podje­ tništvo, je prek inovacij podpirati ukrepe, ki spodbujajo konku­ renčnost podjetij, zlasti MSP.
For the majority of the actions under the three above programmes (2), funding is provided through a grant agreement with the Commission. 
8.6 Financiranje se za večino ukrepov v okviru treh navedenih programov (2) zagotavlja prek sporazumov o dona­ cijah, sklenjenih s Komisijo.
The grants are paid in instalments: an advance when the grant agreement is signed, followed by interim and final payments which reimburse eligible expenditure on the basis of cost statements submitted by the beneficiaries. 8.7. 
Donacije se izplačujejo v obrokih: predplačilo se plača ob podpisu sporazuma o donaciji, sledijo pa mu vmesna in končna plačila, s katerimi se povrnejo upra­ vičeni odhodki na podlagi letnih izjav o stroških, ki so jih predložili upravičenci.
In view of the significant number of cost statements, the Commission is not in a position to check each one on the spot at the level of the beneficiary. 
Komisija zaradi velikega števila izjav o stroških ne more vsake preveriti na kraju samem na ravni upravičenca.
The risk to regularity of payments made on the basis of cost statements is therefore assessed by the Court as high (3). 
Zato Sodišče tveganje za pravilnost plačil, ki se izvršijo na podlagi izjav o stroških, ocenjuje kot visoko (3).
The payment conditions for advance payments are less complex, as these payments are triggered by the signature of the grant agreement or financing decision. 
Plačilni pogoji za predplačila so manj zapleteni, saj se ta plačila izvršijo po podpisu sporazuma o donaciji ali sklepa o financiranju.
(3) The interim or final payments made in 2009 under the FP6, FP7 and CIP programme financed by the 02 — Enterprise policy, amount to 142 million euro. 
(3) Vmesna in končna plačila, izvršena leta 2009 v okviru programov 6.
The Commission has put in place a control strategy and developed ex post audits in order to mitigate the risk with regard to the regularity of payments made. 
8.7 Komisija je vzpostavila strategijo kontrole in razvila naknadne revizije, da bi zmanjšala tveganje v zvezi s pravilnostjo izvrševanja plačil.
The corrective action taken is aimed at reducing the error rate. 
Cilj sprejetega popravljalnega ukrepa je nižja stopnja napak.
The Commission recovers any amount overpaid to the audited beneficiaries. 
Komisija izterja vsak znesek, ki je bil preplačan revidiranim upraviče­ ncem.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 179 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 8.8. IntheframeworkofFP7theCommissionalsoentered into an agreement with the European Space Agency (ESA) (4) with the purpose of financing the Space Component of Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) 2008 to 2013. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 179 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 8.8 Vokviru7.OPjeKomisijatudisklenilasporazumz Evropsko vesoljsko agencijo (ESA) (4), ki je namenjen financi­ ranju vesoljske komponente globalnega spremljanja okolja in varnosti (GMES) v obdobju od leta 2008 do 2013.
In accordance with Article 53d of the Financial Regu­ lation, the Commission delegated budget implementation tasks to ESA. 
V skladu s členom 53d finančne uredbe je Komisija naloge izvrševanja proračuna prenesla na ESA.
Under this agreement, 624 million euro in total are allocated to ESA, out of which an amount of 68 million euro was paid during 2009. 
V okviru tega sporazuma se ESA dodeli skupno 624 milijonov EUR, od katerih je bil v letu 2009 izplačan znesek v višini 68 milijonov EUR.