natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission would like to clarify that the reported variance of rent per person is due to several factors, such as the valuation method of the purchased buildings, the potential cost of fitting-out works, the consideration of buffer spaces, etc. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1 - The institutions1 should update and formalise their building strategies and regularly update planning documents The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Komisija želi pojasniti, da je prijavljena varianca najemnine na osebo posledica več dejavnikov, kot so metoda vrednotenja kupljenih zgradb, morebitni stroški opremljanja, upoštevanje varovalnih prostorov itn. ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA Priporočilo1 – Institucije1 naj posodobijo in uradno potrdijo svoje nepremičninske strategije ter redno posodabljajo dokumente za načrtovanje Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
Concerning the building strategy, the main principles of the Commission’s real estate policy as outlined in the Communication COM(2007)501 are to the largest extent still up-to-date. 
Kar zadeva nepremičninsko strategijo, so glavna načela nepremičninske politike Komisije, kot so opisana v Sporočilu COM(2007) 501, v veliki meri še vedno ažurna.
This policy might be reviewed in light of the developments concerning the NWoW being implemented and on the outcome of 2021-2027 MFF negotiations. 
Ta politika se lahko pregleda ob upoštevanju razvoja novih načinov dela in izida pogajanj o večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2021–2027.
Concerning planning documents, the Commission considers that these documents (MAPFs and Working Document on Buildings accompanying the Draft Budget) are already updated annually. 
Kar zadeva dokumente za načrtovanje, se po mnenju Komisije ti dokumenti (MAPF in delovni dokument o stavbah, ki je priložen predlogu proračuna) že posodabljajo letno.
Consequently the Commission is not concerned by this part of recommendation. 
Komisije zato ta del priporočila ne zadeva.
See also reply to paragraph 13. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 13.
Recommendation 2 – The institutions should evaluate the New Ways of Working projects The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 2 – Institucije naj ocenijo projekte novih načinov dela Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission acknowledges the complexity of the financial regulations but does not agree with the statement that the mechanisms are not transparent (see replies to paragraph 42). 
Komisija priznava zapletenost finančnih predpisov, vendar se ne strinja z izjavo, da mehanizmi niso pregledni (glej odgovore na odstavek 42).
Recommendation 3 – The institutions should increase budgetary transparency of the financing mechanisms for construction projects. The Commission does not accept the recommendation. 
Priporočilo3 – Institucije naj povečajo odgovornost in preglednost mehanizmov financiranja za gradbene projekte Komisija ne sprejema tega priporočila.
Concerning budgetary transparency, the Commission refers to its replies in paragraph 42. 
Kar zadeva preglednost proračuna, se Komisija sklicuje na svoje odgovore v odstavku 42.
Yet, margin for improvements will be assessed. 
Vendar se bo ocenila možnost izboljšav.
Moreover, the Commission could provide each year in the Working Document on Buildings accompanying the Draft Budget, the information about advance payments that would be made for the various projects. 
Poleg tega lahko Komisija vsako leto v delovnem dokumentu o stavbah, ki je priložen predlogu proračuna, zagotovi informacije o predplačilih za različne projekte.
For example, the advance payments made in 2018 would be included in the Working Document for 2020. 
Predplačila, izvršena v letu 2018, bodo na primer vključena v delovni dokument za leto 2020.
Recommendation 4 – The institutions should set up adequate management procedures for large construction and renovation projects The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 4 – Institucije naj vzpostavijo ustrezne postopke vodenja velikih gradbenih projektov in projektov prenove Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission considers that the required building management procedure is in place. 
Komisija meni, da se zahtevani postopek upravljanja stavb že izvaja.
This might be reassessed in the mid-term, particularly in relation to construction and renovation projects such as Loi 130. 
To bi bilo mogoče ponovno oceniti z vmesno oceno, zlasti v zvezi z gradbenimi projekti in projekti prenove, kot je Loi 130.
Recommendation 5 – The institutions should improve consistency of data and monitoring of the buildings portfolio The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo5 – Institucije naj izboljšajo skladnost podatkov in spremljanje portfelja nepremičnin Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission would like to highlight that in real estate matters the different size, needs and localisation of each institution lead to the specific characteristics that can have an important influence on comparison results. 3 
Komisija želi poudariti, da zaradi različnih velikosti, potreb in lokalizacije vsake institucije v nepremičninskem smislu nastanejo posebne značilnosti, ki lahko pomembno vplivajo na rezultate primerjave.
Replies of the Court of Justice INTRODUCTION In general, the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court of Justice’) welcomes the very positive findings made by the European Court of Auditors (‘the Court of Auditors’) concerning the efficiency of its buildings policy, its successful cooperation with the other institutions and with the Luxembourg authorities and the excellent results achieved by the three major building projects audited. 
Odgovor Sodišča Evropske unije UVOD Sodišče Evropske unije (v nadaljevanju: Sodišče) na splošno pozdravlja zelo pozitivne ugotovitve Evropskega računskega sodišča (v nadaljevanju: Računsko sodišče), ki se nanašajo na učinkovitost nepremičninske politike Sodišča, na njegovo plodovito sodelovanje z drugimi institucijami in z luksemburškimi organi ter na odlične rezultate, ki jih je doseglo v okviru treh obsežnih nepremičninskih projektov, ki so predmet revizije.
The building policy of the Court of Justice has two major objectives: — firstly, having first followed a policy of renting, the Court intends, since the definitive fixing of its seat in Luxembourg (decided at the Edinburgh European Council in 1992), to become the owner of the buildings which it occupies, like the other institutions and in line with the recommendations of the Court of Auditors Special Report (No 2/2007) which underlined the budgetary savings of such a policy; — secondly, the Court intends to have premises suitable for its specific judicial needs and to bring all its services together on a single site so as to optimise its functioning. The consistency with which that has been followed, combined with excellent cooperation with the Luxembourg public authorities, has given rise, over time, to very good results. 
Z nepremičninsko politiko Sodišča se uresničujeta dva glavna cilja: - prvič, odkar je bilo dokončno odločeno, da bo sedež Sodišča v Luksemburgu (odločitev sprejeta na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Edinburgu leta 1992), si Sodišče, ki je sprva sledilo politiki najema, prizadeva postati lastnik stavb, ki jih uporablja, kar velja tudi za druge institucije in je v skladu s priporočili Posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča (št. 2/2007), v katerem je poudarjen prihranek, ki ga takšna politika pomeni za proračun; – drugič, Sodišče si prizadeva razpolagati s prostori, ki so prilagojeni njegovim posebnim potrebam, povezanim s sodno dejavnostjo, in vse svoje službe združiti na enem mestu za optimizacijo svojega delovanja Vztrajnost pri izvajanju te politike je skupaj z odličnim sodelovanjem z luksemburškimi organi sčasoma privedla do zelo dobrih rezultatov.
Through the establishment of a system of rigorous and effective internal monitoring, the Court of Justice, with restricted human and financial resources, has run the three audited projects in strict compliance with the specifications of requirements, the timetables and the budgets set. 
Zahvaljujoč vzpostavitvi strogega in učinkovitega sistema notranjega nadzora je Sodišče z omejenimi človeškimi in finančnimi viri tri projekte, ki so predmet revizije, vodilo ob strogem spoštovanju specifikacij zahtev ter določenih časovnic in finančnih sredstev.
The Court of Justice emphasises that the configuration of its buildings complex had to be adapted to the task and judicial activities of the institution and to the needs of its occupants, mostly lawyers. 
Sodišče poudarja, da je bilo treba konfiguracijo njegovega nepremičninskega kompleksa prilagoditi nalogi in dejavnostim sodstva, ki jih opravlja ta institucija, ter potrebam njegovih uporabnikov, ki so večinoma pravniki.
The buildings strategy of the Court of Justice pursues the objective of transparency and responsibility, its achievements being presented annually to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union in reports which are also available to the public on its website. 
Z nepremičninsko strategijo Sodišča se uresničuje cilj preglednosti in odgovornosti, njeni dosežki pa so letno predstavljeni Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu Evropske unije v poročilih, do katerih lahko dostopa tudi javnost na spletnem mestu Sodišča.
The building policy of the Court of Justice has also developed in such a way as to comply with environmental standards, which enabled it to obtain EMAS registration. OBSERVATIONS 38. 
Pri razvoju nepremičninske politike Sodišča so bili prav tako spoštovani okoljski standardi, zaradi česar je to lahko pridobilo registracijo v sistemu EMAS.
Response to points 38 to 41 of the report: The financing of three audited building projects of the Court of Justice was in fact complex but at the same time perfectly supervised and conducted in a fully transparent manner. 
OPAŽANJA Odgovor na točke od 38 do 41 poročila: Financiranje treh nepremičninskih projektov Sodišča, ki so predmet revizije, je resda bilo zapleteno, vendar je bilo hkrati zelo dobro uokvirjeno in je potekalo povsem transparentno.
The documents used to establish the financial framework were drawn up by the competent authorities of the host State in accordance with the legal provisions applicable and have been published or made available to the audit bodies and the budget discharge authorities. 
Pristojni organi države gostiteljice so v skladu z veljavnimi zakonskimi določbami pripravili dokumente za določitev okvira financiranja, ki so bili objavljeni ter dani na voljo revizijskim organom in organom za podelitev razrešnice.
There was no overrun of the budgets or timetables laid down in respect of the two most recent building projects completed by the Court of Justice, as is apparent from paragraph 44 of the report. 
V okviru zadnjih dveh nepremičninskih projektov, ki jih je Sodišče dokončalo, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti nobene prekoračitve določenega proračuna ali časovnic, kot je razvidno iz točke 44 poročila.
The same is true, at this stage, of the last project currently in progress. 
Enako do zdaj velja za zadnji projekt, ki je še v teku.
This has been possible as a result of the establishment by the Court of Justice, in partnership with the Luxembourg authorities, a rigorous and effective internal monitoring system covering the progress of each project, its technical and financial aspects, the performance time limits and the management of the overall financial envelope. 
Ta uspeh je bil mogoč, ker je Sodišče v sodelovanju z luksemburškimi organi vzpostavilo sistem strogega in učinkovitega notranjega nadzora, ki se je nanašal na potek vsakega projekta, na njegove tehnične in finančne vidike, na roke za izvedbo in na obvladovanje skupnih finančnih sredstev.
Further to the request of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, set out in the ‘Joint declaration on building policy of EU institutions and bodies’ of 17.12.2009, the EU institutions agreed on a common methodology based on pre-established standards (standard DIN 277) and on concrete, objective and verifiable data. 
Na podlagi predloga Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta Evropske unije, povzetega v „Skupni izjavi o nepremičninski politiki institucij in organov Evropske unije“ z dne 17. decembra 2009, so institucije Evropske unije določile skupno metodologijo, utemeljeno na vnaprej pripravljenih standardih (standard DIN 277) ter na konkretnih, objektivnih in preverljivih podatkih.
That methodology allows users to set out the most meaningful indicators of efficient land use. 
Ta metodologija uporabnikom omogoča, da predstavijo najpomembnejše kazalnike učinkovitosti uporabe površin.
The annual report of the Court of Justice, available on its website, contains important information enabling the efficiency of its buildings policy to be established. 
Letno poročilo Sodišča, dostopno na njegovem spletnem mestu, vsebuje veliko informacij, na podlagi katerih je mogoče oceniti učinkovitost njegove nepremičninske politike.
The administration of the Court of Justice uses standard DIN277 without any deviation or alteration. 
Uprava Sodišča uporablja standard DIN 227 neposredno in brez kakršne koli spremembe.
The adaptation of the space management tool to its needs and, above all, the architectural and spatial configuration of its complex is appropriate and does not affect the comparability of its data. 
Prilagoditev orodja za upravljanje s prostori njegovim potrebam ter predvsem arhitekturni in prostorski konfiguraciji njegovega nepremičninskega kompleksa je ustrezna in ne vpliva na primerljivost njegovih podatkov.
The building rented by the Court of Justice (T/Tbis) has an annual cost of EUR 270/m2, which is a preferential price granted by the host State, significantly below the market price in Luxembourg City (EUR 564/m2 — see Figure 12). 
Letni strošek stavbe, ki jo Sodišče najema (T/Tbis), znaša 270 EUR/m2, kar je ugodna cena, ki jo je odobrila država gostiteljica in je veliko nižja od tržne cene v mestu Luxembourg (564 EUR/m2 - glej sliko 12).
It should be recalled that the Court of Justice has decided to continue to rent the entire T/Tbis building, despite its surface area being larger than its needs, instead of leasing a building smaller in size but more expensive. 
Opozoriti je treba, da se je Sodišče odločilo še naprej najemati stavbo T/Tbis v celoti, čeprav je njena površina večja od njegovih potreb, namesto da bi najelo stavbo, ki bi bila manjša, vendar veliko dražja.
Furthermore, the T/Tbis building was offered for rent only in its entirety. 
Poleg tega je bila stavba T/Tbis ponujena v najem zgolj kot celota.
The Court of Justice was therefore not in position to lease only part of its area for a limited duration. 
Sodišče torej ni imelo možnosti najeti zgolj del njene površine, pa še to za določen čas.
The rental of the entire building has allowed the Court of Justice to make maximum use of the flexibility offered by the additional area. 
Najem stavbe v celoti je Sodišču omogočil, da kar najbolj izrabi fleksibilnost, ki jo ponuja dodatna površina.
That option has been beneficial for other institutions which, according to their specific needs, have obtained the agreement of the Court of Justice to install their offices in a part of the building to meet temporary needs. 
To je koristilo drugim institucijam, ki so glede na svoje posebne potrebe od Sodišča dobile dovoljenje za namestitev svojih pisarn v delu stavbe za izpolnjevanje posebnih potreb.
That is the case of the Court of Auditors, the Translation Centre, EPSO and the European Investment Bank. 
To velja za Računsko sodišče, Prevajalski center, EPSO in Evropsko investicijsko banko.
In addition, the constraints of the Court of Justice as regards confidentiality and security did not permit it to sublet the unused area to private companies. 
Poleg tega Sodišče neuporabljene površine zaradi omejitev na področju zaupnosti in varnosti ni moglo oddati v podnajem zasebnim družbam.
The fact that the Court of Justice has been increasingly unable to continue to sublet the unoccupied part of the building over the last two years, due to its leaving the building, which is planned for the end of August 2019, is not without importance. 
Pomembno je tudi dejstvo, da Sodišče poleg tega ni moglo nadaljevati z oddajanjem praznega dela stavbe v podnajem v zadnjih dveh letih, kar je posledica predvidene zapustitve stavbe konec meseca avgusta 2019.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1 The Court of Justice agrees with that recommendation and points out that it has long had a well-defined buildings strategy, which it has consistently followed and which has been successful over the years. 
UGOTOVITVE IN PRIPOROČILA Priporočilo 1 Sodišče se strinja z vsebino tega priporočila in poudarja, da že dolgo razpolaga z nepremičninsko strategijo, ki je dobro opredeljena in se dosledno izvaja ter ki je tekom let obrodila sadove.
The Court of Justice plans its building development carefully, together with the Luxembourg administration, according to its medium and long-term needs, by including analysis of the various options possible. 
Sodišče skrbno načrtuje razvoj na področju nepremičnin, pri čemer sodeluje z luksemburško upravo ter upošteva svoje srednje-in dolgoročne potrebe, kar vključuje analizo različnih možnosti.
The results of that planning are formalised in both annual activity reports and other strategic documents of the institution. 
Rezultati tega načrtovanja so formalizirani tako v letnih poročilih dejavnosti kot v drugih programskih dokumentih institucije.
Recommendation 2 The Court of Justice agrees with that recommendation, all the more so as it regularly assesses the working conditions and space allocation and continuously monitors developments and changes in that area, both on the private market and in other institutions or national or international public bodies. 
Priporočilo 2 Sodišče se strinja s tem priporočilom, sploh ker samo redno preučuje delovne razmere in prostorsko razporeditev, hkrati pa nenehno spremlja razvoj in spremembe na tem področju, tako na zasebnem trgu kot v drugih nacionalnih in mednarodnih javnih institucijah in organih.
Recommendation 3 The Court of Justice agrees with that recommendation in so far as it concerns the requirement to make the funding of building projects less complex. 
Priporočilo 3 Sodišče se strinja s tem priporočilom v delu, v katerem se nanaša na predlog za manjšo zapletenost pri financiranju njegovih nepremičninskih projektov.
In that regard, the Court of Justice, drawing on the relevant provisions of the Financial Regulation, has decided to finance the work to make its buildings secure, soon to be carried out, by taking out a loan which it will contract directly with a financial body. 
V tem smislu se je Sodišče na podlagi uporabe zadevnih določb Finančne uredbe odločilo, da bo dela v zvezi z varovanjem svojih stavb, ki bodo kmalu izvedena, financiralo s pomočjo posojila, ki ga bo najelo neposredno pri finančni instituciji.
Recommendation 4 The Court of Justice agrees with that recommendation, since the procedures put in place within the Court for the management of complex building projects demonstrate their merits every time (in particular in respect of the building projects CJ4, CJ8 and, currently, CJ9). 
Priporočilo 4 Sodišče se strinja s tem priporočilom, saj se postopki, ki jih je samo uvedlo za upravljanje kompleksnih nepremičninskih projektov, ob vsaki priložnosti izkažejo za utemeljene (zlasti za nepremičninske projekte CJ4, CJ8 in trenutno CJ9).
Those procedures are the result of an excellent working relationship with the Luxembourg authorities and the effective involvement of the host State in the proper conduct of those projects. 
Ti postopki so rezultat odličnega sodelovanja z luksemburškimi organi in dejanske zavzetosti države gostiteljice za pravilen potek navedenih projektov.
The fact of having had the benefit of the expertise, human resources and the moral authority of the host State’s public administration has enabled not only the completion of projects on time and within the budget allocated, but also significant savings for the institution’s budget. 
Strokovno znanje, človeški viri in moralna avtoriteta javne uprave države gostiteljice so omogočili ne samo, da so bili projekti končani v določenih rokih in ob spoštovanju dodeljenih sredstev, ampak tudi velike prihranke za proračun institucije.
The contractual arrangement between the host State and the Court of Justice has been constantly improved over time. 
Pogodbeni dogovori med državo gostiteljico in Sodiščem so se konstantno izboljševali.
It is, at present, balanced, ensuring that the Court of Justice has effective involvement which has enabled it to acquire ‘full administrative, technical and financial control’ of its building projects, as recommended by the Court of Auditors in its Special Report No 2/2007 (point 45). 
Zdaj so uravnoteženi in Sodišču zagotavljajo dejansko sodelovanje, zaradi katerega je lahko pridobilo „popoln upravni, tehnični in finančni nadzor“ nad svojimi nepremičninskimi projekti, kot je Računsko sodišče priporočilo v Posebnem poročilu št. 2/2007 (točka 45).
The Court of Justice has been and continues to be supported in that process by an external consultant, who has the role of verifying the proper implementation of the contract and monitoring its application within the framework defined. 
Sodišču je v tem procesu pomagal in mu še vedno pomaga zunanji svetovalec, katerega vloga je preverjati, da se pogodbeni dogovori v praksi pravilno izvajajo, in opravljati nadzor nad tem, da se uporablja v opredeljenem okviru.
Recommendation 5 The Court of Justice agrees with that recommendation and stresses the need for close interinstitutional cooperation, in ensuring its full availability to take part and to share its experience. 
Priporočilo 5 Sodišče se strinja s tem priporočilom in poudarja nujnost tesnega medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja ter hkrati sporoča svojo polno razpoložljivost za udeleženost v njem in deljenje svojih izkušenj.
In Luxembourg, the Interinstitutional Property Management Coordination Group (GICIL) will be the forum for sharing information in the field in question. 
V Luxembourgu bo Groupe Interinstitutionnel de Coordination Immobilière (medinstitucionalna skupina za nepremičninsko koordinacijo, GICIL) forum za izmenjavo informacij na zadevnem področju.
Furthermore, it has already undertaken to update and refine the methodology for measuring, classifying and displaying property data, developed in 2009 by the Swedish Council Presidency, so that the institutions’ annual reports and in particular the annex concerning property matters, can provide relevant and common indicators, enabling easier comparison between the institutions. 
Poleg tega že zdaj posodablja in izpopolnjuje metodologijo meritev, kategorizacije in predstavitve podatkov o nepremičninah, ki jo je leta 2009 razvilo švedsko predsedstvo Sveta, tako da so v letnih poročilih institucij, zlasti v prilogi o nepremičninskih zadevah, predstavljeni upoštevni in skupni kazalniki, ki omogočajo lažjo primerjavo med institucijami.
Replies of the European Central Bank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III. 
Odgovor Evropske centralne banke POVZETEK III.
The ECB would like to note that (i) it has a formalised and periodically revised building strategy (see also the ECB’s comment on recommendation 1), including office accommodation-related planning; (ii) it was excluded from the institutions analysed in respect of large construction projects (see paragraph 43); and (iii) the ECA assessed the ECB’s monitoring and reporting of its buildings portfolio as “well-developed” (see paragraph 62). 
ECB želi izpostaviti, (i) da ima formalizirano nepremičninsko strategijo, ki jo redno pregleduje (glej tudi pripombo ECB na priporočilo 1), vključno z načrtovanjem v zvezi s pisarniškimi prostori, (ii) da je ni bilo med institucijami, ki so se analizirale v zvezi z velikimi gradbenimi projekti (glej odstavek 43), in (iii) da je Evropsko računsko sodišče (ECA) ocenilo, da je v ECB spremljanje portfelja nepremičnin in poročanje o njem »dobro razvito« (glej odstavek 62).