natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
185 (185) planned in the establishment plan, of which occupied: 162 (141) Other positions: 75 (60) of which: 36 contract agents, 17 Seconded National Experts, 22 interim staff. 
185 (185) mest, načrtovanih v načrtu delovnih mest, od tega zasedenih: 162 (141). Druga mesta: 75 (60), od tega: 36 pogodbenih uslužbencev, 17 napotenih nacionalnih strokovnjakov in 22 nado­ mestnih uslužbencev.
Total staff: 295 (248) Allocated to: Operational tasks: 157 (131) Administrative tasks: 107 (89) Combined tasks: 31 (28) Number of coordination meetings 141 (131) Total number of cases 1 424 (1 193) Fraud: 631 (612) Drug trafficking: 254 (230) Terrorism: 25 (19) Murder: 83 (90) Trafficking in human beings: 87 (74) Source: Information supplied by Eurojust. 
Skupno število zaposlenih: 295 (248). Ti opravljajo: operativne naloge: 157 (131), upravne naloge: 107 (89), obojne naloge: 31 (28). Število koordinacijskih sestankov 141 (131) Skupno število primerov 1 424 (1 193) Goljufije: 631 (612) Trgovina z drogami: 254 (230) Terorizem: 25 (19) Umori: 83 (90) Trgovina z ljudmi: 87 (74) Vir: Podatki, ki jih je posredoval Eurojust.
C 366/144 Official Journal of the European Union 15.12.2011 EN EUROJUST’S REPLIES 13. 
C 366/144 Uradni list Evropske unije 15.12.2011 SL ODGOVORI EUROJUSTA 13.
Duetohigheractivitiesin2010,automaticcarry-oversincreasedcomparedtothepreviousyear, mainly due to the Organisational Structural Review project, a new computer infrastructure costs and Data Process costs. 
Zaradi večje dejavnosti v letu 2010 se je število avtomatskih odlogov v primerjavi s prejšnjim letom povečalo, v glavnem zaradi projekta za oceno organizacijske strukture, zaradi stroškov za novo računalniško infrastrukturo in zaradi stroškov za obdelavo podatkov.
If one makes abstraction of these three elements, there was a reduction in carried forward as a whole on a like for like basis. 
Če teh treh elementov ne upoštevamo, se je število odlogov v povprečju zmanjšalo.
The College needs to rectify this anomaly or a new regulation should redress this structural defi­ ciency. 
Kolegij mora odpraviti to nepravilnost, ali pa bo potreben nov ukrep, ki bo popravil to strukturno pomanjkljivost.
To prevent this kind of mistakes in the future, Eurojust will make sure that the quality standards of procedure in use in the Union’s tender will be respected and that Eurojust’s evaluators will be made aware of their responsibility when participating in joint procedures with other organisations 16. 
Dabivprihodnjepreprečiltakšnenapake,boEurojustposkrbel,dasebodoupoštevalakakovostna merila trenutnega postopka v razpisih Unije in da se bodo Eurojustovi ocenjevalci, ko sodelujejo v skupnih postopkih z drugimi organizacijami, zavedali svoje odgovornosti. 16.
Although the documentation corresponding to said recruitment file was not complete, the Acting Administrative Director at the time confirmed having taken the decision for the extension of said reserve list. 
Čeprav dokumentacija, glede na omenjeno datoteko zaposlovanja, ni bila popolna, je vršilec dolž­ nosti upravnega direktorja že takrat potrdil, da je sklenil razširiti omenjeni rezervni seznam.
In order to ensure that such a situation does not arise in the future, Eurojust will take measures to ensure that all the decisions concerning recruitments will be adequately documented 17. 
Z namenom, da zagotovi, da se takšen primer v prihodnje ne bi ponovil, bo Eurojust poskrbel, da bodo vse odločitve v zvezi z zaposlovanjem zadostno dokumentirane. 17.
The European Union’s Judicial Cooperation Unit (hereinafter “Eurojust”), which is located in The Hague, was set up by Council Decision 2002/187/JHA1 with a view to stepping up the fight against serious organised crime. 
Urad za evropsko pravosodno sodelovanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Eurojust) s sedežem v Haagu je bil ustanovljen s Sklepom Sveta 2002/187/PNZ1 za okrepitev boja proti težjim oblikam organiziranega kriminala.
Its objective is to improve the coordination of cross-border investigations and prosecutions between the Member States of the European Union, and between Member States and non-Member States2. INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE 2. 
Njegov cilj je izboljševati koordinacijo čezmejnih preiskav in pregonov med državami članicami Evropske unije ter med državami članicami in državami nečlanicami.2 INFORMACIJE V PODKREPITEV IZJAVE O ZANESLJIVOSTI 2.
The audit approach taken by the Court comprises analytical audit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an assessment of key controls of Eurojust’s supervisory and control systems. 
Revizijski pristop Sodišča vključuje analitične revizijske postopke, neposredno preizkušanje transakcij in oceno ključnih kontrol nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov Eurojusta.
Annex II summarises Eurojust’s competences and activities. 
V Prilogi II, ki je predstavljena v informativne namene, so povzete pristojnosti in dejavnosti Eurojusta.
The accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer are derived from the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) issued by the International Federation of Accountants or, where relevant, the International Accounting Standards (IAS)/International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. ADB001972EN04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
Računovodska pravila, ki jih je sprejel računovodja Komisije, so izpeljana iz mednarodnih računovodskih standardov za javni sektor (MRSJS), ki jih je izdala Mednarodna zveza računovodskih strokovnjakov, ali, kadar je smiselno, iz mednarodnih računovodskih standardov (MRS) / mednarodnih standardov računovodskega poročanja (MSRP), ki jih je izdal Odbor za mednarodne računovodske standarde. ADB001972SL04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
These standards require the Court to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the annual accounts of Eurojust are free from material misstatement and the transactions underlying them are legal and regular. 
Ti standardi določajo, da mora Sodišče revizijo načrtovati in opraviti tako, da pridobi razumno zagotovilo, da je zaključni račun Eurojusta brez pomembno napačnih navedb in da so z njim povezane transakcije zakonite in pravilne.
The audit also entails evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies, the ADB001972EN04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
Med revizijo se tudi ovrednotijo primernost računovodskih usmeritev, sprejemljivost računovodskih ocen in celotna predstavitev računovodskih izkazov.
10.The comments which follow do not call the Court’s opinions into question. 
10. Zaradi naslednjih pripomb mnenji Sodišča nista vprašljivi.
COMMENTS ON BUDGETARY MANAGEMENT 11.The level of committed appropriations for the different titles varied between 99 % and 98 % of total appropriations, indicating that legal commitments were made in a timely manner. 
Stopnja odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti, za različne naslove se je gibala med 99 % in 98 % vseh odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, kar kaže na to, da so bile pravne obveznosti pravočasno prevzete.
However, the level of committed appropriations carried over to 2014 was high for title III (operating expenditure) at 2 341 825 euro (32 %). 
Toda stopnja odobrenih proračunskih sredstev v naslovu III (operativni odhodki), za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti in ki so bila prenesena v leto 2014, je bila visoka in je znašala 2 341 825 EUR (32 %).
This was mainly the result of delays associated with the handover of internal software management to a new service provider at the year-end. 
To je bilo predvsem posledica zamud, povezanih s predajo upravljanja notranje programske opreme novemu ponudniku storitev konec leta.
Also, reimbursements of expenditure from grant schemes which were used to support “Joint Investigation Teams” were only due in 2014. 
Poleg tega so bili roki za povračilo odhodkov iz shem nepovratnih sredstev, uporabljenih za podporo skupnih preiskovalnih enot, šele v letu 2014.
6 12.In 2013, the Agency made 49 budget transfers affecting 101 budget lines. 
12.Eurojust je leta 2013 izvedel 49 proračunskih prerazporeditev, ki so se nanašale na 101 proračunsko vrstico.
This indicates weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. 
To kaže na slabosti pri načrtovanju in izvrševanju proračuna.
An overview of the corrective actions taken in response to the Court's comments from previous years is provided in Annex I. This Report was adopted by Chamber IV, headed by Mr Milan Martin CVIKL, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 1 July 2014. 
6 SPREMLJANJE UPOŠTEVANJA PRIPOMB IZ PREJŠNJIH LET 12.Pregled popravljalnih ukrepov, sprejetih na podlagi pripomb Sodišča iz prejšnjih let, je v Prilogi I. To poročilo je sprejel senat IV, ki ga vodi g.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President ADB001972EN04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik ADB001972SL04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
1 Follow-up of previous years’ comments ANNEX I Year Court’s comment Status of corrective action (Completed / Ongoing / Outstanding / N/A) 2011 In the report for the financial year 2010, the Court noted that there was scope to reconsider the definition of respective roles and responsibilities between the Director and the College of Eurojust in order to avoid the overlap of responsibilities, currently resulting from the Founding Regulation1. 
1 Spremljanje upoštevanja pripomb iz prejšnjih let PRILOGA I Leto Pripomba Sodišča Status popravljalnega ukrepa (zaključen / se izvaja / neizveden / ni relevantno) 2011 Sodišče je v poročilu za proračunsko leto 2010 opozorilo, da bi bilo mogoče razmisliti o ponovni opredelitvi vlog in odgovornosti direktorja in kolegija Eurojusta, da bi odpravili prekrivanje odgovornosti, ki izhaja iz ustanovne uredbe1.
No corrective measures were taken in 2011. Ongoing 2011 Eurojust has not yet adopted all Implementing Rules of the Staff Regulations2. 
V letu 2011 niso bili sprejeti nobeni popravni ukrepi. se izvaja 2011 Eurojust še ni sprejel vseh izvedbenih pravil za kadrovske predpise2. zaključen 2012 Leta 2008 je bila podpisana okvirna pogodba za varnostne storitve, ki je bila spremenjena leta 2009.
The amended formula to calculate prices increased them progressively up to 22 %, whereas the original framework contract had provided for a maximum increase of 4 %. 
Zaradi spremenjene formule za izračun cen so se te postopoma zvišale za 22 %, po prvotni okvirni pogodbi pa bi se zvišale največ za 4 %.
The total price increase above the 4 % ceiling amounted to some 440 000 euro for the 2008 to 2012 period, of which some 68 000 euro were paid in 2012. 
Skupno zvišanje cen nad zgornjo mejo 4 % je znašalo približno 440 000 EUR za obdobje 2008–2012, od katerih je bilo leta 2012 plačanih 68 000 EUR.
Such a significant increase may undermine the transparency and fairness of the initial procurement procedure and distort competition. N/A ADB001972EN04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
Tako veliko zvišanje lahko negativno vpliva na preglednost in poštenost prvotnega postopka oddaje javnih naročil in izkrivlja konkurenco. ni relevantno ADB001972SL04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
2 Year Court’s comment Status of corrective action (Completed / Ongoing / Outstanding / N/A) 2012 There is room to improve the transparency of recruitment procedures. 
2 Leto Pripomba Sodišča Status popravljalnega ukrepa (zaključen / se izvaja / neizveden / ni relevantno) 2012 Eurojust bi lahko povečal preglednost postopkov za zaposlovanje.
There was no evidence that questions for tests and interviews were set before the examination of the applications by the Selection Board and there is no evidence that the weighting between written tests and interviews was set before candidates’ screening. Completed 1 2 Articles 28, 29, 30 and 36 of Decision 2002/187/JHA, as amended by Decisions 2003/659/JHA (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 
Ni bilo dokazov, da so bila vprašanja za pisne preizkuse in razgovore določena, preden je izbirna komisija pregledala prijave, in ni dokazov, da so bili ponderji za pisne preizkuse in razgovore določeni pred preverjanjem kandidatov. zaključen 1 2 Členi 28, 29, 30 in 36 Sklepa 2002/187/PNZ, kakor je bil spremenjen s sklepoma 2003/659/PNZ (UL L 245, 29.9.2003, str.
44) and 2009/426/JHA (OJ L 138, 4.6.2009, p. 
44) in 2009/426/PNZ (UL L 138, 4.6.2009, str.
Implementing rules are missing for the following areas: “Reclassification”, “Administrative inquiries and disciplinary procedure”, “Part-time work”, “Job-Sharing”, “Middle management”, “Temporary occupation of management posts”, “Appraisal senior management”, “Early retirement without reduction of pension rights”, “Leave”, “Staff Committee” and “Mission guide.” ADB001972EN04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
Izvedbena pravila manjkajo za naslednja področja: „prerazporeditev“, „upravne poizvedbe in disciplinski postopek“, „delo z delovnim časom, krajšim od polnega“, „delitev delovnega mesta“, „srednji vodstveni delavci“, „začasna zasedba vodstvenih mest“, „ocenjevanje visokih vodstvenih delavcev“, „zgodnje upokojevanje brez zmanjšanja pokojninskih pravic“, „dopust“, „odbor uslužbencev“ in „navodila za službena potovanja“. ADB001972SL04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
1 ANNEX II Eurojust (The Hague) Competences and activities Areas of Union competence deriving from the Treaty (Article 85 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) Competences of Eurojust (as defined in Articles 3, 5, 6 and 7 of Council Decision 2002/187/JHA, as amended by Decision 2003/659/JHA and Decision 2009/426/JHA) Tasks Article 5 of Council Decision 2002/187/JHA, as amended by Decision 2003/659/JHA and Decision 2009/426/JHA In order to accomplish its objectives, Eurojust shall fulfil its tasks: (a) through one or more of the national members concerned in accordance with Article 6, or (b) as a College in accordance with Article 7: (i) when so requested by one or more of the national members concerned by a case dealt with by Eurojust, or (ii) when the case involves investigations or prosecutions which have repercussions at Union level or which might affect Member States other than those directly concerned, or (iii) when a general question relating to the achievement of its objectives is involved, or (iv) when otherwise provided for in this Decision. 
1 PRILOGA II Eurojust (Haag) Pristojnosti in dejavnosti Področja pristojnosti Unije, ki izhajajo iz Pogodbe (člen 85 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije) Pristojnosti Eurojusta (kakor so opredeljene v členih 3, 5, 6 in 7 Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/P NZ, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2003/659/PNZ in Sklepom Sveta 2009/426/PNZ) Naloge Člen 5 Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2003/659/PNZ in Sklepom Sveta 2009/426/PNZ Za uresničitev svojih ciljev Eurojust izpolnjuje svoje naloge: (a) prek enega ali več udeleženih nacionalnih članov v skladu s členom 6 ali (b) kot kolegij v skladu s členom 7: (i) če tako zahteva eden ali več nacionalnih članov, udeleženih v primeru, ki ga obravnava Eurojust, ali (ii) če gre za preiskave ali pregone, ki imajo posledice na ravni Unije ali ki lahko vplivajo na države članice, ki niso neposredno udeležene, ali (iii) če gre za splošno vprašanje, ki se nanaša na uresničevanje njegovih ciljev, ali (iv) če je s tem sklepom drugače določeno.
When it fulfils its tasks, Eurojust shall indicate whether it is acting through one or more of the national members within the meaning of Article 6 or as a College within the meaning of Article 7. 
Eurojust pri izpolnjevanju svojih nalog navede, ali deluje prek enega ali več nacionalnih članov v smislu člena 6 ali kot kolegij v smislu člena 7.
Article 6 of Council Decision 2002/187/JHA, as amended by Decision 2003/659/JHA and Decision 2009/426/JHA 1. 
Člen 6 Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2003/659/PNZ in Sklepom Sveta 2009/426/PNZ 1.
When Eurojust acts through its national members concerned, it: (a) may ask the competent authorities of the Member States concerned, giving its reasons, to: (i) undertake an investigation or prosecution of specific acts, (ii) accept that one of them may be in a better position to undertake an investigation or to prosecute specific acts, Eurojust’s mission is to support and strengthen coordination and cooperation between national authorities in the fight against serious cross-border crime affecting the European Union. 
Če Eurojust deluje prek svojih udeleženih nacionalnih članov: (a) lahko na podlagi ustrezne utemeljitve zaprosi pristojne organe držav članic, da: (i) izvedejo določena dejanja preiskave ali pregona; (ii) privolijo, da je eden med njimi lahko v boljšem položaju za izvedbo določenih dejanj preiskave ali pregona; (iii) koordinirajo pristojne organe zadevnih držav članic; Naloga Eurojusta je podpirati in krepiti koordinacijo in sodelovanje nacionalnih organov pri boju proti težjim oblikam čezmejnega kriminala, ki vplivajo na Evropsko unijo.
Objectives Article 3 of Council Decision 2002/187/JHA, as amended by Decision 2003/659/JHA and Decision 2009/426/JHA In the context of investigations and prosecutions, concerning two or more Member States, of criminal behaviour referred to in Article 4 in relation to serious crime, particularly when it is organised, the objectives of Eurojust shall be: (a) to stimulate and improve the coordination, between the competent authorities of the Member States, of investigations and prosecutions in the Member States, taking into account any request emanating from a competent authority of a Member State and any information provided by any competent body by virtue of provisions adopted within the framework of the Treaties; (b) to improve cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States, in particular by facilitating the execution of requests for, and decisions on, judicial cooperation, including regarding instruments giving effects to the principle of mutual recognition; (c) to support otherwise the competent authorities of the Member States in order to render their investigations and prosecutions more effective. 
Cilji Člen 3 Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2003/659/PNZ in Sklepom Sveta 2009/426/PNZ V okviru preiskav in pregonov, ki zadevajo dve ali več držav članic in v zvezi s težjimi vrstami kaznivih dejanj iz člena 4, predvsem pa na področju organiziranega kriminala, ima Eurojust naslednje cilje: (a) spodbujati in izboljševati koordinacijo med pristojnimi organi držav članic pri preiskavah in pregonih v državah članicah, ob upoštevanju zaprosil pristojnih organov države članice in podatkov, ki jih posredujejo vsi organi, pristojni po določbah, sprejetih v okviru Pogodb; (b) izboljšati sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi držav članic, predvsem z olajševanjem izvrševanja zaprosil in odločitev za pravosodno sodelovanje, tudi v zvezi z instrumenti, ki uveljavljajo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja; (c) drugače podpirati pristojne organe držav članic, s ciljem povečati učinkovitost njihovih preiskav in pregonov.
ADB001972EN04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
ADB001972SL04-14PP-CH103-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_EUROJUST-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
2 (iii) coordinate between the competent authorities of the Member States concerned, (iv) set up a joint investigation team in keeping with the relevant cooperation instruments, (v) provide it with any information that is necessary for it to carry out its tasks, (vi) take special investigative measures, (vii) take any other measure justified for the investigation or prosecution; (b) shall ensure that the competent authorities of the Member States concerned inform each other on investigations and prosecutions of which it has been informed; (c) shall assist the competent authorities of the Member States, at their request, in ensuring the best possible coordination of investigations and prosecutions; (d) shall give assistance in order to improve cooperation between the competent national authorities; (e) shall cooperate and consult with the European Judicial Network, including making use of and contributing to the improvement of its documentary database; (f) shall, in the cases referred to in Article 3(2) and (3) and with the agreement of the College, assist investigations and prosecutions concerning the competent authorities of only one Member State. 
Vodenje (členi 2, 9, 23, 28, (iv) ob upoštevanju ustreznih instrumentov sodelovanja ustanovijo skupne preiskovalne skupine; (v) ga seznanijo z vsako informacijo, ki jo potrebuje za opravljanje svojih nalog; (vi) izvedejo posebne preiskovalne ukrepe; (vii) sprejmejo katere koli druge ukrepe, ki so potrebni zaradi preiskave ali pregona; (b) zagotovi, da se pristojni organi držav članic medsebojno obveščajo o preiskavah in pregonih, o katerih je bil obveščen; (c) na zaprosilo pristojnih organov držav članic pomaga tako, da jim zagotovi najboljšo možno koordinacijo preiskav in pregonov; (d) pomaga z namenom izboljšati sodelovanje med pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi; (e) sodeluje in se posvetuje z Evropsko pravosodno mrežo, med drugim lahko uporablja njeno dokumentarno podatkovno bazo in prispeva k njenemu izboljšanju; (f) v primerih iz člena 3(2) in (3) ter v soglasju s kolegijem pomaga pri preiskavah in pregonih, ki se nanašajo na pristojne organe zgolj ene države članice.
The Member States shall ensure that competent national authorities respond without undue delay to requests made under this Article. 
Države članice tudi zagotovijo, da se pristojni nacionalni organi nemudoma odzovejo na zaprosila, predložena v skladu s tem členom.
Article 7 of Council Decision 2002/187/JHA, as amended by Decision 2003/659/JHA and Decision 2009/426/JHA 1. 
Člen 7 Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2003/659/PNZ in Sklepom Sveta 2009/426/PNZ 1.
Such logistical support may include assistance for translation, interpretation and the organisation of coordination meetings. 
Takšna logistična podpora lahko vključuje pomoč pri prevajanju, tolmačenju in organizaciji koordinacijskih sestankov.
Where two or more national members cannot agree on how to resolve a case of conflict of jurisdiction as regards the undertaking of investigations or prosecution pursuant to Article 6 and in particular Article 6(1)(c), the College shall be asked to issue a written non-binding opinion on the case, provided the matter could not be resolved through mutual agreement between the competent national authorities concerned. 
Če se dva ali več nacionalnih članov ne morejo dogovoriti, kako rešiti spor o pristojnosti v zvezi z izvedbo preiskave ali pregona v skladu s členom 6 in zlasti členom 6(1)(c), se kolegij zaprosi, da izda nezavezujoče pisno mnenje o tem, kako naj se primer reši, če ga ni mogoče rešiti z medsebojnim dogovorom ustreznih pristojnih nacionalnih organov.
The opinion of the College shall be promptly forwarded to the Member States concerned. 
Mnenje kolegija se nemudoma pošlje ustreznim državam članicam.
This paragraph is without prejudice to paragraph 1(a)(ii). 
Ta odstavek ne posega v odstavek 1(a)(ii).