natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the Commission acknowledges that the link between some objectives of different hierarchical levels (community, national, regional, per measure, per sub-measure) could be clarified in the case of Andalucía by harmonising the objectives' wording. 
Vendar Komisija priznava, da bi lahko bila v primeru Andaluzije povezava med nekaterimi ukrepi različnih hierarhičnih ravni (raven skupnosti, nacionalna in regionalna raven, raven ukrepa in raven podukrepa) razjasnjena z uskladitvijo ubeseditve ciljev.
The Commission has verified that the measure and objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely as well as verifiable to the extent possible during the procedure of the programmes’ approval. 
Komisija je med postopkom odobritve programa potrdila, da so ukrep in cilji specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, stvarni in časovno opredeljeni, pa tudi preverljivi, kolikor je to mogoče.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Moreover, objectives formulated in a general manner can very well provide a specific measurable outcome which can be assessed, if they are combined with specific targets (such as ‘reduce by 20 %’) 3. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Poleg tega pa lahko splošno oblikovani cilji zagotovijo specifičen merljiv rezultat, ki ga je mogoče oceniti, če se ga združi s posebnimi cilji (kot je „zmanjšanje za 20 %“)3.
Such specific targets should be set by Member States whenever possible. 
Take posebne cilje bi morale države članice določiti, kadar je le mogoče.
Initially, some Member States had difficulties to establish baseline levels due to lack of adequate statistical data. 
Na začetku so imele nekatere države članice zaradi pomanjkanja statističnih podatkov težave pri določanju osnovnih ravni.
However, the Commission together with Member States have undertaken steps to remedy the situation. 
Vendar je Komisija skupaj z državami članicami sprejela ukrepe, da bi to popravila.
With regard to time frames, agri-environment objectives are to be attained at the end of the measure’s application (5-or 7-year period), unless specified otherwise. 
Kar zadeva časovne okvire morajo biti kmetijsko-okoljski cilji doseženi ob koncu uporabe ukrepa (5 ali 7 let), razen če je določeno drugače.
1 For instance, in the case of Andalucía, water scarcity is tackled by axis 1 measures and other funds; biodiversity and climate change are addressed by forestry measures of axis 2, agri-environment, axis 1 measures (training, investments), and other European and national funds. 
1 Na primer, v Andaluziji se pomanjkanje vode rešuje z ukrepi 1. osi in drugimi sredstvi; biotsko raznovrstnost in podnebne spremembe obravnavajo gozdarski ukrepi 2. osi, kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi, ukrepi 1. osi (usposabljanje, naložbe) ter druga evropska in nacionalna sredstva.
2 In the particular case of Andalucía, the hierarchy of environmental objectives is the following: (a) Council Decision 2006/144 identifies three environmental priorities at Community level: biodiversity and High Nature Value, water, and climate change. (b) On this basis, the Spanish National Strategy Plan (NSP) identifies five general objectives: biodiversity, water, climate change (reflecting the community priorities), soil erosion, and landscape maintenance (reflecting specific problems in Spain). 
2 V Andaluziji je na primer hierarhija okoljskih ciljev naslednja: a) Sklep Sveta 2006/144 opredeljuje 3 okoljske prednostne naloge na ravni Skupnosti : biotska raznovrstnost in visoka naravna vrednost, voda in podnebne spremembe; b) na tej podlagi španski nacionalni strateški načrt opredeljuje 5 splošnih ciljev : biotska raznovrstnost, voda, podnebne spremembe (ukrepi odražajo prednostne naloge Skupnosti), erozija tal in ohranjanje pokrajine (ukrepi odražajo posebne probleme v Španiji).
The five general objectives are further developed into 19 objectives. (c) The 19 operational environmental objectives of the NSP are directly linked with objectives set out for different RDP measures, mostly from axis 2, but also from axes 1 and 3. (d) The agri-environment measure is implemented through 15 sub-measures. 
Teh 5 splošnih ciljev je nadalje razdeljenih na 19 ciljev; c) 19 operativnih okoljskih ciljev nacionalnega strateškega načrta je neposredno povezanih s cilji, določenimi za različne ukrepe programov razvoja podeželja, večinoma 2. osi, a tudi 1. in 3. osi; d) kmetijsko-okoljski ukrep se izvaja preko 15 podukrepov.
All the objectives defined for all sub-measures have a direct link with the objectives defined in the RDP and the NSP. 
Vsi cilji, opredeljeni za vse podukrepe, so neposredno povezani s cilji, opredeljenimi v programu razvoja podeželja in nacionalnem strateškem načrtu.
3 For example, the programme of Andalucía includes a sub-measure with an objective to maintain genetic resources. 
3 Na primer, program Andaluzije vključuje podukrep s ciljem vzdrževanja genskih virov.
As the baseline situation (number of animals concerned certified by a relevant organism) is well described and targets for the programming period clearly set, the objectives are both clear and verifiable. Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
Ker je izhodiščno stanje (število zadevnih živali, ki je potrjeno z zadevnim organizmom) dobro opisano in cilji za programsko obdobje jasno določeni, so cilji jasni in preverljivi. Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
60 As regards Poland, while it is true that the textual description of the objectives does not specifically refer to the baseline, each agri-environment package (sub-measure) has a quantified output indicator, including Package 8, ‘Soil and water protection’. 
60 Kar zadeva Poljsko, sicer drži, da se teks-tovni opis ciljev ne nanaša izrecno na osnovno raven, vendar ima vsak kmetijsko-okoljski paket (podukrep) količinsko opredeljen kazalnik učinka, vključno s paketom 8, „zaščita tal in voda“.
Additionally, the impact indicator defined for the measure as a whole, namely ‘Improvement of water quality’ defines a percentage change from the 2005 baseline 4. 
Poleg tega kazalnik vpliva, določen za ukrep kot celoto, in sicer „izboljšanje kakovosti vode“, določa odstotek spremembe osnove iz leta 20054.
With respect to time frame, the column containing the target is headed ‘2007–13’ implying that the programming period is the time frame. 
Kar zadeva časovni okvir, je stolpec s ciljem naslovljen „2007–2013“, kar pomeni, da je časovni okvir programsko obdobje.
Outcome-oriented sub-measures can offer a great degree of flexibility in designing and managing agri-environment. 
Rezultatsko usmerjeni podukrepi lahko nudijo visoko stopnjo prožnosti pri zasnovi in upravljanju kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
However, they can only be applied to certain types of agri-environment schemes where monitoring of their results is possible at farm level. 
Vendar se lahko uporabljajo samo za določene vrste kmetijsko-okoljskih shem, pri katerih je spremljanje njihovih rezultatov mogoče na ravni kmetij.
In many cases, measuring outcomes of sub-measures addressing physically more diffuse problems at farm level would not be reliable (due to an interaction with activities of other farmers in the area). REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 31–32. 
V številnih primerih merjenje rezultatov podukrepov, ki obravnavajo fizično bolj razpršene probleme na ravni kmetij, ne bi bilo zanesljivo (zaradi vpliva dejavnosti drugih kmetov v istem območju).
The Commission is of the opinion that the evaluation of agri-environment’s effectiveness should be performed, as is current practice, at the axis level in terms of results, and at programme level in terms of impacts. 
Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba izvesti oceno učinkovitosti kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov na ravni osi z vidika rezultatov in na ravni programa z vidika učinkov, kakor narekuje tudi veljavna praksa.
Attempting to assess the effectiveness at sub-measure level would create disproportionally high administrative costs and burden, and would not be likely to lead to conclusive findings. 
Poskus ocenjevanja na ravni podukrepa bi ustvaril nesorazmerno visoke upravne stroške in breme ter najverjetneje ne bi vodil k pre-pričljivim ugotovitvam.
Moreover, while some agri-environment sub-measures address potentials and opportunities, the Commission maintains that there is a clear link between environmental pressures and agri-environment sub-measures. 
Medtem ko nekateri kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi obravnavajo potenciale in priložnosti, Komisija poudarja, da obstaja jasna povezava med pritiski na okolje in kmetijsko-okoljskimi podukrepi.
For further details, see reply to point 30. 
Za podrobnejše informacije glej odgovor na točko 30.
As regards the general aspects of the Court’s observation, please refer to the replies to points 30 and 31–32. 
Glede splošnih vidikov ugotovitve Sodišča glej odgovore na točke 30 in 31–32.
The character of the link to the environmental pressures it responds to can usually be inferred from the sub-measure’s content. 
Narava povezave s pritiski na okolje, na katere se odzivajo kmetijsko-okoljski podukrepi, se običajno lahko izlušči iz vsebine podukrepa.
Rural development programmes (RDP) must ensure the respect of the relevant legal obligations resulting from alternative policies. 
Programi za razvoj podeželja morajo zagotoviti spoštovanje zadevnih pravnih obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz alternativnih politik.
The relevant regulatory framework that constitutes a baseline for agri-environment operations is checked by the Commission when assessing agri-environment measures. 
Zadevni ureditveni okvir, ki tvori osnovo za kmetijsko-okoljske operacije, preveri Komisija pri ocenjevanju kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
4 The impact indicators for reversal of biodiversity decline and prevention of climatic change also define changes from the 2005 baseline. 
4 Kazalniki vpliva za zmanjšanje izgube biotske raznovrstnosti in preprečevanje podnebnih sprememb prav tako opredeljujejo spremembe osnove iz leta 2005.
61 While agri-environment and other policies and rural development instruments can complement each other in achieving environmental objectives, for reasons of subsidiarity, it should be left to the Member States to assess which policies to use for a given purpose. 
61 Medtem ko se lahko kmetijsko-okoljska in druge politike ter razvojni instrumenti pri doseganju okoljskih ciljev medsebojno dopolnjujejo, bi bilo treba zaradi subsidiarnosti oceno tega, katere politike uporabiti za določen namen, prepustiti državam članicam.
Training and advice are also complementary tools which can substantially improve the efficiency of agri-environment. 
Usposabljanje in svetovanje sta tudi dopolnilni orodji, ki lahko precej izboljšata učinkovitost kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
The Commission is constantly encouraging Member States to make use of these instruments. 
Komisija države članice nenehno spodbuja k uporabi teh instrumentov.
Where Member States justify the links between the measure proposed and the environmental needs identified in the rural development programme (RDP), and where the measure’s commitments go beyond the reference level, agri-environment can be used as an instrument to address those needs and provide a remedy for them. 
Če države članice utemeljijo povezave med predlaganim ukrepom in okoljskimi potrebami, opredeljenimi v programu razvoja podeželja, in če obveznosti ukrepa presegajo referenčno raven, se kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi lahko uporabijo kot instrument za obravnavanje teh potreb in zagotavljanje rešitve zanje.
The Commission ensures, through the rules on demarcation, that there is no overlap in payments between various EU funds and supports. 
Komisija s pomočjo pravil razmejitve zagotavlja, da se plačila različnih skladov in pomoči EU ne prekrivajo.
Please see also the reply to point 37. 
Glej tudi odgovor na točko 37.
The Commission welcomes that the Court recognises the improvements brought about by the introduction of the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF). 
Komisija pozdravlja priznanje Sodišča glede izboljšav, ki jih je prinesla uvedba okvira skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja.
There is a learning process with any new system, and it should take some time for all actors involved to become sufficiently familiar with the CMEF, to generate the required quality of data 6. 
Pri vsakem novem sistemu poteka proces učenja in vsi sodelujoči akterji bodo potrebovali nekaj časa, da bodo okvir skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja spoznali v tolikšni meri, da bodo lahko ustvarili zahtevano kakovost podatkov6.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 41. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 41.
Monitoring tables contain data on operations included in declarations of expenditure already paid by the Commission, in order to ensure consistency with financial execution tables. 
Tabele za spremljanje vsebujejo podatke o operacijah, vključenih v izjave o izdatkih, ki jih je Komisija že plačala, da se zagotovi skladnost s tabelami finančnega izvajanja.
In Andalucía, due to delays in the presentation of the declarations of expenditure by the Paying Agency, certain amounts already paid to beneficiaries have not been declared yet to the Commission. 
V Andaluziji zaradi zamud plačilne agencije pri predložitvi izjav o izdatkih nekateri zneski, ki so upravičencem že bili plačani, Komisiji še niso bili priglašeni.
Thus, output and result indicators included in the monitoring tables may not correspond to the amounts actually paid out to beneficiaries. 
Zato kazalniki učinkov in rezultatov v tabelah za spremljanje morda ne ustrezajo zneskom, ki so bili upravičencem dejansko izplačani.
Once these initial problems are solved, it is expected that the monitoring tables will provide more reliable data. 
Ko bodo rešene te osnovne težave, se pričakuje, da bodo tabele za spremljanje zagotavljale bolj zanesljive podatke.
In the case of France, the indicators submitted in 2008 were incomplete (especially the result indicators). 
V primeru Francije so bili kazalniki, predloženi leta 2008, nepopolni (zlasti kazalniki rezultatov).
According to the French authorities, the implementation of some measures was not sufficiently advanced to allow the measurement of any results. 
Po mnenju francoskih organov izvajanje nekaterih ukrepov ni bilo tako napredno, da bi omogočilo merjenje kakršnih koli rezultatov.
The indicators submitted in 2009 are more comprehensive. 
Kazalniki, predloženi v letu 2009, so bolj izčrpni.
5 For example, baseline for agri-environment in form of cross-compliance, the use of Art. 68 of Reg. 73/2009, Common Market Organisation regime such as fruits and vegetables Operational Programmes. 
5 Na primer, osnova za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe v obliki navzkrižne skladnosti, uporaba člena 68 Uredbe 73/2009, režim skupne ureditve trga, kot so operativni programi za sadje in zelenjavo.
Member States were requested to provide information on the use of other policy tools in cases where an environmental priority was not clearly supported by the RDP proposed. 
Države članice so morale predložiti informacije o uporabi drugih orodij politike v primerih, v katerih predlagani program razvoja podeželja ni jasno podpiral okoljske prednostne naloge.
6 In the framework of a specific and exhaustive check of the rural development programme (RDP) targets in 2008, the Commission sent the Member States a list of comments (missing targets, wrong calculations ...) and invited the Managing Authorities (MA) to send a completed and improved set of baselines and targets (output, result and impacts) in 2009. 
6 V okviru posebnega in izčrpnega pregleda ciljev programa razvoja podeželja leta 2008 je Komisija državam članicam poslala seznam pripomb (manjkajoči cilji, napačni izračuni ...) in organe upravljanja pozvala, naj v letu 2009 pošljejo popoln in izboljšan sklop osnovnih vrednosti in ciljev (učinki, rezultati in vplivi).
The annual report indicators (output and result) are validated by the Commission. 
Letne kazalnike poročanja (učinke in rezultate) ovrednoti Komisija.
If anomalies are identified, a resubmission of the annual reports is requested. 
Če ugotovi nepravilnosti, zahteva ponovno predložitev letnih poročil.
In addition, the screening of the tables across RDP is performed by the European Network for Rural Development (EN RD) contact point. Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
Poleg tega tabele programa razvoja podeželja pregleda kontaktna točka Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja (EN RD). Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
62 As regards the Court’s observation regarding overstatement of expenditures, both annual and cumulative expenditures are requested. 
62 Glede ugotovitev Sodišča v zvezi s prece-njenimi izdatki so zahtevani tako letni kot skupni izdatki.
Both sets of data are valuable for our analyses. 
Oba sklopa podatkov sta koristna za naše analize.
Improvements to the monitoring system, to allow a closer link to implementation as well as correlation with reimbursements made to Member States are under consideration for the future programming period. 
Za prihodnje programsko obdobje se preučujejo izboljšave sistema spremljanja, da bi se omogočila tesnejša povezava z izvajanjem in ujemanje s povračili državam članicam.
The task of measuring the result indicators is the responsibility of the Member States. 
Naloga merjenja kazalnikov rezultatov je odgovornost držav članic.
The Commission has reiterated at different occasions (evaluation expert committee, Rural Development Committee) that only the area under successful land management can be compiled and included in the indicator in question. 
Komisija je ob različnih priložnostih (Strokovni odbor za vrednotenje, Odbor za razvoj podeželja) ponovila, da se v zadevni kazalnik lahko združi in vključi samo zemljišče, s katerim se uspešno gospodari.
The Commission agrees that there is a need to further improve the indicators’ implementation by Member States. 
Komisija se strinja, da morajo države članice nadalje izboljšati izvajanje kazalnikov.
The revision of the post-2013 monitoring and evaluation system for rural development will address this question. 
To vprašanje bo obravnavano pri ponovnem pregledu sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja po letu 2013 za razvoj podeželja.
The implementation of the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) during the 2007–13 programming period represents a learning phase. 
Izvajanje okvira skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 predstavlja fazo učenja.
Whilst a considerable improvement on the previous situation, the Commission services acknowledge that it could still be further improved. 
Čeprav pomeni precejšnje izboljšanje v primerjavi s prejšnjim stanjem, službe Komisije priznavajo, da bi ga bilo mogoče še dodatno izboljšati.
The post-2013 monitoring and evaluation system for rural development will take account of lessons learned. 
Sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja po letu 2013 za razvoj podeželja bo upošteval pridobljena spoznanja.
In the Hungarian case, the issues of water and soil quality and biodiversity protection are already well covered by indicators related to axis 2, where Hungary has added 13 additional, baseline indicators with corresponding target figures, several of which concern the agri-environment measure (e.g. Protection of cultivated area jeopardised by soil loss (water and wind erosion)), which correspond to the five core objectives of the Hungarian agri-environment measure. 
V primeru Madžarske so vprašanja kakovosti vode in prsti ter zaščite biotske raznovrstnosti v veliki meri že zajeta v kazalnikih, povezanih z 2. osjo, kjer je Madžarska dodala 13 dodatnih, osnovnih kazalnikov z ustreznimi ciljnimi podatki, od katerih se jih več nanaša na kmetijsko-okoljski ukrep (npr. „Zaščita obdelovalne površine, ki jih ogroža izguba prsti“ (vodna in vetrna erozija)), ustrezajo pa 5 temeljnim ciljem madžarskega kmetijsko-okoljskega ukrepa.
The financial follow-up is organised at measure level. 
Finančno spremljanje je organizirano na ravni ukrepa.
The Commission does not consider it feasible to ensure a financial follow-up at the level of sub-measures as this would produce a significant administrative burden which would neither be justified nor accepted by Member States. 
Komisija meni, da finančno spremljanje ni izvedljivo na ravni podukrepov, saj bi to povzročilo veliko upravno breme, ki ga države članice ne bi niti utemeljile niti sprejele.
Furthermore, such an approach would not be consistent with and disproportionate in comparison to other shared management policies. 
Poleg tega tak pristop ne bi bil skladen in sorazmeren z drugimi politikami deljenega upravljanja.
However, while Natura 2000 has not been foreseen as a specific category within the agri-environment measure since a separate measure is available, the monitoring tables do provide an area breakdown according the different Less Favoured Area (LFA) categories. 
Čeprav Natura 2000 ni bila predvidena kot posebna kategorija v okviru kmetijsko-okoljskega ukrepa, ker je na voljo ločen ukrep, tabele za spremljanje zagotavljajo razdelitev površin glede na različne kategorije območij z omejenimi možnostmi.
63 In the revision of the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) for the post-2013 period other geographical breakdowns will be considered. 
63 V ponovnem pregledu okvira skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja za obdobje po letu 2013 bodo upoštevane druge geografske razčlenitve.
The output indicator 35 (total area under agri-environment support) is indeed subdivided according to 12 types of commitment, for example ‘entry-level commit-ment’, ‘actions to conserve soil’, etc., some of which are further divided into subcategories (see Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) Handbook Guidance Note H). 
Kazalnik učinka 35 (skupna površina, za katero se prejema kmetijsko-okoljska podpora) je dejansko razdeljen na 12 vrst zavez, kot so na primer „zaveza na začetni ravni“, „ukrepi za ohranjanje prsti“ itd., nekatere zaveze pa so še nadalje razdeljene na podkategorije (glej navodilo H Priročnika o okviru skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja).
Managing Authorities are expected to aggregate data on contracts according to these categories. 
Pričakuje se, da bodo organi upravljanja podatke glede pogodb zbrali v skladu s temi kategorijami.
This means that it is possible to distinguish between different types of schemes, for example light schemes (such as entry-level schemes) and more demanding commitments (such as organic farming). 
To pomeni, da je mogoče razlikovati med različnimi vrstami shem, na primer enostavnimi shemami (kot so sheme na začetni ravni) in bolj zahtevnimi zavezami (kot je ekološko kmetovanje).
CMEF monitoring information can be extracted for agri-environment schemes as a whole, or for any specific sub-category. 
Informacije o spremljanju na podlagi okvira skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja se lahko pridobi za kmetijsko-okoljske sheme kot celoto ali za katero koli posebno podkategorijo.
As the monitoring framework does include a certain differentiation of the agri-environmental commitments’ categories, Member States should make better use of such options in monitoring agri-environment. 
Ker okvir spremljanja vključuje določeno razlikovanje med kategorijami kmetijsko-okoljskih zavez, bi morale države članice pri spremljanju kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov takšne možnosti bolje izkoristiti.
Any other differentiation post-2013 should not increase the complexity and administrative burden of agri-environment’s management. 
Vsako drugo razlikovanje po letu 2013 ne bi smelo povečati kompleksnosti in upravnega bremena, povezanega z upravljanjem kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
Box 2 The aggregation of total contracts/areas gives an overview of agri-environment commitments. 
Okvir 2 Združevanje vseh pogodb/zemljišč nudi pregled kmetijsko-okoljskih zavez.
The Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) indicators also provide for sub-divisions related to the specific objectives of schemes, which allow more detailed examination/ analysis of the situation. 
Kazalniki okvira skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja predvidevajo tudi razdelitev, povezano s posebnimi cilji shem, ki omogočajo podrobnejši pregled/analizo položaja.