natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
While the Commission is not currently a member of the GEF, and so can directly contribute to it, considerable scope exists for more co-financing with it. 
Čeprav Komisija trenutno ni članica Globalnega sklada za okolje in lahko zato neposredno prispeva vanj, obstaja še precej prostora za skupno sofinanciranje.
Box 15 An example of project impact and sustainability reduced by problems with policy and legal framework In Brazil, the Commission, through the Natural Resources Policy Programme (NRPP), finances the definition and implementation of an integrated environmental management model and its decentralisation from central Government to the state and municipal levels in five States of the Amazon (16,7 million euro). 
Okvir 15 Primer zmanjšanja vpliva in trajnosti projekta zaradi težav s političnim in pravnim okvirom Komisija v Braziliji preko programa Politika naravnih virov (Natural Resources Policy Programme) (NRPP) v petih državah amazonskega področja financira opredelitev in izvajanje modela integriranega ravnanja z okoljem ter njegovo decentralizacijo z osrednje vladne ravni na državno in mestno raven (16,7 milijona EUR).
The NRPP was the main project funded under the Rain Forest Pilot Programme (PPG7), aimed at reaching the overarching objective of controlling and reversing deforestation in the Amazon. 
NRPP je bil glavni projekt, financiran v okviru Poskusnega programa za deževni gozd (PPG7), namenjen pa je bil doseganju glavnega cilja, obvladovanju in ustavitvi krčenja gozda na amazonskem območju.
The environmental management model has been less effective than anticipated for controlling deforestation. 
Pri obvladovanju krčenja gozda je bil model ravnanja z okoljem manj uspešen, kot je bilo pričakovano.
Among the reasons behind this, the lack of political commitment at State political level was deter-minant. 
Med razlogi za to je bilo odločilno pomanjkanje politične zavezanosti na državno politični ravni.
The precarious finances of most of the States and municipalities and the vested economic interests of some State and local elites make it possible for local governments to accept logging concessions and agriculture expansion, which generate revenue and employment to the detriment of forest management. 
Nego-tova finančna sredstva večine držav in občin ter vloženi gospodarski interesi nekaterih državnih in lokalnih elit omogočajo lokalnim vla-dam, da sprejemajo dovolilnice za sečnjo in širjenje kmetijskih površin, ki ustvarjajo prihodke in delovna mesta v škodo upravljanja gozda.
Because of these, in some States the model has had little impact on public policy or, at worst, has been applied as a purely restrictive instrument. 
Zato je imel model v nekaterih državah majhen vpliv na javno politiko ali se je v najslabšem primeru uporabljal kot čisti restriktivni instrument.
Furthermore, it has been used to identify areas of further economic expansion rather than for environmental management. 
Poleg tega je bil bolj kot za ravnanje z okoljem uporabljen za ugotavljanje področij nadaljnje gospodarske rasti.
The State of Mato Grosso, where the model is best developed, was, however, the state with the worst deforestation rate in 2004. 
Vendar je bila država Mato Grosso, kjer je model najbolje razvit, leta 2004, država z največjo stopnjo krčenja gozdov.
The programme has not been able to guarantee that environmental issues are effectively mainstreamed in other sectors like agriculture, forestry, education, transport, etc. in the States. This is a crucial aspect as the programme operates in a political and economic context of short-term pro-development policies and priorities that do not coincide with sustainable development. 
V državah program ni mogel zagotoviti uspešne integracije okoljskih vprašanj v druge sektorje, kot so kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo, izobraževanje, transport itd. To je bistven vidik, saj program deluje v političnem in gospodarskem okviru kratkoročnih in v razvoj usmerjenih politik in prednostnih nalog, ki ne sovpadajo s trajnostnim razvojem.
The poor environmental mainstreaming policy means that State environmental agencies have to rely too much on command-and-control procedures. 
Slaba politika integracije okolja pomeni, da se morajo državne agencije za okolje preveč zanašati na postopke odrejanja in kontrole.
However, this is heavily constrained by the lack of financial resources and trained staff to so there is no effective licensing and control. 
Vendar je to močno omejeno s pomanjkanjem finančnih virov in usposobljenega osebja, zato ni uspešnega licenciranja in nadzora.
Unrealistic approach to financial viability 78. 
Nerealen pristop k finančnemu obstoju 78.
Commission projects in the environment sector, as in other sectors, have included the assumption that they should ultimately be financially sustainable. 
Tako kot v drugih sektorjih so projekti Komisije v sektorju okolja vsebovali predpostavko, da bi sčasoma morali biti finančno trajnostni.
In revenue-generating projects this is a goal which can be realistically pursued. 
Pri projektih, ki ustvarjajo prihodke, je to cilj, za katerega si je realno možno prizadevati.
Indeed, in wastewater treatment projects in Mauritius and TanzaniaŐs second city, Mwanza, good progress was being made towards this objective, water tariffs steadily being increased towards the level where they would cover operational and depreciation costs. 
Pri projektih ravnanja z odpadnimi vodami na Mauritiusu in v tanzanijskem drugem največjem mestu Mwanza, je bil dosežen dober uspeh pri doseganju tega cilja, saj so se vodne tarife enakomerno povečevale proti stopnji, ki bi pokrivala stroške poslovanja in amortizacije.
On the other hand, in the Pacific region solid waste disposal projects in Fiji and Tuvalu were experiencing difficulties because of the populationŐs unwillingness to pay for the service. 
Na drugi strani sta v pacifiški regiji projekta odstranjevanja trdnih odpadkov na Fidžiju in Tuvaluju naletela na težave, ker prebivalci te storitve niso bili pripravljeni plačati.
C 235/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.9.2006 Box 16 Economic activities threatening to undermine effectiveness of projects In Indonesia the Commission has supported the development of sustainable forest management in the Berau area of Kalimantan. 
C 235/20 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 29.9.2006 Okvir 16 Gospodarske dejavnosti, ki ogrožajo uspešnost projektov V Indoneziji je Komisija podpirala razvoj trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov na območju Berau v Kalimantanu.
However, Berau Coal Company has a licence for 25 % of the area, which includes 16 of the 18 long-term research plots being funded. 
Vendar ima premogovni-ško podjetje Berau licenco za 25 % območja, kar vključuje dolgoročno financiranje 16 do 18 raziskovalnih parcel.
Although coal mining activities are officially suspended until at least 2011, the initial end of the current project, exploration activities on the coal layers were taking place even during the CourtŐs mission in June 2005. 
Čeprav so premog-ovniške dejavnosti uradno ustavljene vsaj do leta 2011, kar je bil prvotno postavljen datum za dokončanje tekočega projekta, je raziskovanje plasti premoga potekalo celo še med revizijskim obiskom Sodišča, junija 2005.
Illegal logging also continued to undermine the effectiveness of Commission funding to the forestry sector in Indonesia. 
Prav tako je uspešnost Komisijinega financiranja gozdarskega sektorja v Indoneziji še naprej ogrožala nezakonita sečnja.
In China, despite a general logging ban, in two (Hainan, Hunan) of the three provinces covered by the Natural Forestry project, deforestation continued. 
Na Kitajskem se je kljub splošni prepovedi sečnje v dveh od treh provinc (Hainan, Hunan), ki so zajete v projekt Naravno gozdarstvo (Natural Forestry), krčenje gozda nadaljevalo.
In Tanzania, mining exploration activities were taking place in the Kigosi Game Reserve, one of the reserves being funded from the EDF. 
V Tanzaniji so v rezervatu za divjad Kigosi, ki je eden od rezervatov financiran iz ERS, potekale dejavnosti v zvezi z raziskovanjem rud.
The Commission has yet to sufficiently address the environmental aspects of its development cooperation and has still to establish a comprehensive environment strategy for its development cooperation. 
Komisija mora šele začeti z učinkovitim obravnavanjem okoljskih vidikov svojega razvojnega sodelovanja in mora še vzpostaviti izčrpno okoljsko strategijo za svoje razvojno sodelovanje.
The new development policy, signed in December 2005, provides a clearer basis for developing such a strategy by recognising the importance not only of mainstreaming the environment into all development programmes and projects but also making the environment a priority field for expenditure. 
Nova razvojna politika, podpisana decembra 2005, zagotavlja jasnejšo osnovo za razvoj take strategije, saj poleg priznavanja pomembnosti integracije okolja v vse razvojne programe in projekte tudi določa, da je okolje prednostno področje odhodkov.
Nevertheless, without a clear strategy to help make the new development policyŐs approach to the environment operational, its potential benefits are likely to be undermined. 
Kljub temu bodo njene potencialne koristi k uresničevanju novega pristopa k razvojni politiki do okolja verjetno ogrožene.
Over the period 2001 to 2005, the CommissionŐs strategy was focussed very largely on mainstreaming the environment into development cooperation. 
V obdobju 2001–2005 je bila strategija Komisije osredotočena predvsem na integracijo okolja v razvojno sodelovanje.
However, implementation of this strategy has been slow and not adequately followed up while the implications of the strategy in terms of additional staffing needs have not been properly addressed. 
Vendar je izvajanje te strategije potekalo počasi, nadaljnje ukrepanje ni bilo ustrezno, posledice strategije v zvezi z dodatnimi potrebami po uslužbencih pa niso bile ustrezno obravnavane.
Although training for existing staff on environmental mainstreaming did begin in 2005, it has suffered from not being compulsory for key officials. 
Čeprav se je usposabljanje o integraciji za obstoječe uslužbence začelo leta 2005, ni bilo učinkovito, saj za ključne uradnike ni bilo obvezno.
The preparation of a manual on environmental mainstreaming has been seriously delayed and was only nearing completion at the end of 2005. 
Priprava priročnika o integraciji okolja je močno zamujala in njen zaključek se je bližal koncu šele konec leta 2005.
More generally, greater attention could have also been given to monitoring, evaluating and reporting on the environmental performance of the CommissionŐs development cooperation. 
V bolj splošnem smislu bi se lahko večjo pozornost posvetilo tudi spremljanju, vrednotenju in poročanju o uspešnosti poslovanja Komisijinega razvojnega sodelovanja z vidika okolja.
Partly because of some of these shortcomings, the environment has yet to be effectively mainstreamed into the CommissionŐs development cooperation. 
Okolje je šele treba uspešno integrirati v razvojno sodelovanje Komisije, delno tudi zaradi nekaterih od teh pomanjkljivosti.
Current CSPs (2001 to 2006) have not adequately addressed environmental issues although the Commission has taken significant steps to improve the environmental analysis available for the next generation of CSPs now being prepared. 
V sedanjih državnih strateških dokumentih (2001–2006) okoljska vprašanja niso bila ustrezno obravnavana, čeprav je Komisija uvedla pomembne ukrepe za izboljšanje okoljske analize, ki bo na voljo za naslednjo generacijo državnih strateških dokumentov, ki se sedaj pripravljajo.
How far this improved analysis will actually be translated into the new CSPs still depends on the priority given to the environment by both the Commission and beneficiary countries. 
V kolikšni meri bo taka izboljšana analiza dejansko prenesena v nove državne strateške dokumente, je še vedno odvisno od prednostne obravnave, ki jo bodo okolju dali Komisija in države upravičenke.
While mainstreaming the environment into direct budgetary aid is a significant challenge for all donors, the Commission has done little to address this important issue. 
Čeprav je integracija okolja v neposredno proračunsko pomoč precejšen izziv za vse donatorje, Komisija v zvezi z obravnavo tega pomembnega vprašanja ni storila veliko.
At project level, environmental mainstreaming has suffered from a lack of systematic procedures in the absence of a manual which clearly defines key procedures and makes compliance with them compulsory. 
Ker ni bilo priročnika, ki jasno opredeljuje ključne postopke in predpisuje obvezno skladnost z njimi, je bila zaradi pomanjkanja sistematičnih postopkov integracija okolja na ravni projektov slabša.
While environment projects financed have been relevant the outputs and results achieved have frequently fallen short of objectives although in some cases this was due to overambitious project design. 
Medtem ko so bili financirani projekti pomembni, doseženi učinki in rezultati pogosto niso izpolnili ciljev, čeprav se je to v nekaterih primerih zgodilo zaradi preambciozne zasnove.
Apart from design and implementation problems the project approach, at least in isolation from other aid instruments, has inherent difficulties in achieving significant impacts and assuring financial viability. 
Če projektni pristop obravnavamo ločeno od drugih instrumentov pomoči, so zanj, poleg težav z zasnovo in izvajanjem, značilne tudi težave, pri doseganju pomembnih vplivov in zagotavljanju finančne sposobnosti.
This points to the need to assess the possibility of using other instruments to better address these issues in the context of an overall environment strategy. 
To kaže na potrebo, da se oceni možnost uporabe drugih instrumentov, s katerimi bi se dalo v kontekstu celotne okoljske strategije bolje obravnavati ta vprašanja.
There is a need for the Commission to clarify how high the environment ranks as a priority amongst the many different priorities it has to address in the field of development cooperation. 
Komisija mora razjasniti, kako visoko se okolje kot prednostna naloga uvršča med številnimi različnimi prednostnimi nalogami na področju razvojnega sodelovanja.
If the environment is to be seen as one of the three pillars of sustainable development this indeed requires that the Commission seeks to ensure that this policy priority is actually translated into environment programmes and projects in the Country Strategy Papers, that it has sufficient in-house environmental expertise and that clear environmental integration procedures are both defined and complied with. 
Če želimo okolje obravnavati kot enega od treh stebrov trajnostnega razvoja, si mora Komisija dejansko prizadevati zagotoviti, da je ta prednostna politika tudi dejansko prenesena v okoljske programe in projekte v državnih strateških dokumentih, da ima zadostno strokovno znanje o okolju znotraj lastne institucije ter da so jasni postopki za integracijo okolja opredeljeni in upoštevani.
Recommendations Establishing a comprehensive strategy for the environment and following up its implementation 87. 
Priporočila Vzpostavitev izčrpne strategije za okolje in nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi z njenim izvajanjem 87.
The Commission should establish a comprehensive strategy for the environmental aspects of its development cooperation, based on the new approach to environmental issues adopted in the 2005 Development Policy. 
Komisija bi morala za okoljske vidike svojega razvojnega sodelovanja vzpostaviti izčrpno strategijo, na podlagi novega pristopa k okoljskim vprašanjem, sprejetega v razvojni politiki leta 2005.
The Commission should establish a new operational framework for implementing its environment strategy and ensure clear performance indicators and coordination mechanisms for its implementation. 
Komisija bi morala za izvajanje svoje okoljske strategije vzpostaviti nov operativni okvir ter za njegovo izvajanje zagotoviti jasne kazalnike učinkovitosti in mehanizme za koordinacijo.
The Commission should review the adequacy of its in-house capacity to implement its environment strategy. 
Komisija bi morala preučiti ustreznost svoje notranje zmogljivosti za izvajanje svoje okoljske strategije.
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/21 90. 
29.9.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 235/21 90.
The environment integration manual should be completed and approved as quickly as possible and the appropriate mechanisms put in place to ensure the procedures laid down in the manual are systematically implemented. 
Priročnik o integraciji okolja bi bilo treba čimprej dokončati in odobriti ter vzpostaviti ustrezne mehanizme za zagotovitev sistematičnega izvajanja postopkov, določenih v priročniku.
Training, taking into account the new manual, should be made compulsory for all key staff and sufficient funding should be allocated for this purpose. 
Usposabljanje za vse ključno osebje mora postati obvezno, ob upoštevanju novega priročnika in za ta namen morajo biti dodeljena zadostna finančna sredstva.
The Commission should establish a comprehensive system for reviewing its environmental performance by carrying out an overall evaluation, improving the systems for evaluating individual projects and better exploiting data from its external monitoring system. 
Komisija bi morala uvesti izčrpen sistem za pregledovanje svoje okoljske učinkovitosti, z izvajanjem splošnega vrednotenja posameznih projektov in boljšim izkoriščanjem podatkov iz njenega sistema zunanjega spremljanja.
The Commission should review its internal financial reporting system to ensure the recording of environment-related expenditure within the framework of projects which do not have the environment as their primary objective. 
Komisija bi morala pregledati svoj notranji sistem finančnega poročanja, da zagotovi evidentiranje z okoljem povezanih odhodkov v okviru projektov, pri katerih okolje ni prvi cilj.
Improving the effectiveness of environmental mainstreaming 94. 
Izboljševanje uspešnosti integracije okolja 94.
The Commission should ensure that the analysis and recommendations of the recent CEPs are systematically and transparently followed up when preparing the new CSPs. 
Komisija bi morala pri pripravi novih državnih strateških dokumentov zagotoviti sistematično in pregledno nadaljnje ukrepanje po analizah in priporočilih zadnjih državnih okoljskih profilov.
The Commission should make a particular effort to better mainstream the environment into its direct budgetary support, in particular by ensuring that SEAs are carried out and by seeking opportunities to include environmental indicators. 
Komisija bi si morala še posebej prizadevati za boljšo integracijo okolja v svojo neposredno proračunsko podporo, zlasti z zagotavljanjem izvajanja strateških okoljskih presoj in iskanjem priložnosti za vključevanje okoljskih kazalnikov.
Specific procedures for ensuring the environmental screening of all projects should be established and these should be checked by environment focal points in Delegations and by the specialist environment staff in Europeaid. 
Za pregled z okoljskega vidika je treba vzpostaviti posebne postopke, ki naj jih preverjajo kontaktne točke za okolje v delegacijah in osebje s strokovnim znanjem s področja okolja v EuropeAid.
Specific checks should be introduced to ensure that EIAs are undertaken wherever appropriate and that their recommendations are followed up in environment management plans and contract conditions. 
Treba je uvesti posebne preglede, da se povsod zagotovi izvajanje presoj vplivov na okolje, kjer je to ustrezno, ter da se v skladu z njihovimi priporočili nadalje ukrepa v načrtih ravnanja z okoljem in pogojih, določenih v pogodbah.
Improving the effectiveness of environment projects 98. 
Izboljševanje uspešnosti okoljskih projektov 98.
The Commission should give a higher priority to the on-the-spot appraisal of environment project proposals. 
Komisija bi morala dati večjo prednost ocenjevanju predlogov okoljskih projektov na kraju samem.
The Commission should take further steps to identify and remove bottlenecks in procurement procedures. 
Komisija bi morala nadalje ukrepati v zvezi z ugotavljanjem in odpravljanjem zastojev pri postopkih javnih naročil.
The Commission should give greater attention to helping local communities find sustainable ways of using natural resources. 
Komisija bi morala več pozornosti posvetiti pomoči lokalnim skupnostim pri iskanju trajnostnih načinov uporabe naravnih virov.
With a view to improving impact and sustainability, including building institutional capacity, the Commission should analyse the effectiveness of different aid instruments in the environment sector. 
Za izboljšanje vpliva in trajnosti, vključno z izgradnjo institucionalne zmogljivosti, bi morala Komisija analizirati uspešnost različnih instrumentov pomoči v sektorju okolja.
As alternatives to the current approach of using relatively short term projects, consideration should be given to making greater use of the sectoral policy support programmes, trust funds, and co-financing with the Global Environment Facility as well as funding traditional projects over longer time periods. 
Kot alternativo trenutnemu pristopu, ki uporablja relativno kratkoročne projekte, bi bilo treba razmisliti o večji uporabi programov podpore sektorski politiki, skrbniških skladov in sofinanciranju z Globalnim skladom za okolje pa tudi o financiranju tradicionalnih projektov v daljših časovnih obdobjih.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 15 June 2006. 
To poročilo je sprejelo Računsko sodišče v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju 15. junija 2006.
C 235/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.9.2006 ANNEX I OECD DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE Ń PROJECT CLASSIFICATION DAC5 Code (1) 410 CRS Code (2) 41 010 41 020 41 030 41 040 41 050 41 081 41 082 Description General environmental protection Environmental Policy and administrative management Biosphere protection Bio-diversity Site preservation Flood prevention/control Environmental education/training Environmental research Clarifications/Additional notes on coverage Non-sector specific. 
C 235/22 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 29.9.2006 PRILOGA I ODBOR ZA RAZVOJNO POMOČ OECD – KLASIFIKACIJA PROJEKTOV Šifra DAC5 (1) 410 Šifra CRS (2) 41 010 41 020 41 030 41 040 41 050 41 081 41 082 Opis Splošno varstvo okolja Okoljska politika in upravno poslovodenje Varstvo biosfere Biološka raznovrstnost Ohranjanje območja Preprečevanje/obvladovanje poplav Okoljsko izobraževanje/usposabljanje Okoljske raziskave Pojasnila/Dodatne opombe o pokritosti Ni vezano na določen sektor.
Environment policy, laws, regulations and economic instruments; administrational institutions and practices, environmental and land use planning and decision-making procedures; seminars, meetings; miscellaneous conservation and protection measures not specified below. 
Okoljska politika, zakoni, predpisi in ekonomski instrumenti; upravne institucije in prakse, okoljsko načrtovanje in načrtovanje rabe zemljišč ter postopki odločanja; seminarji, srečanja; razni ohranitveni in zaščitni ukrepi, ki niso navedeni spodaj.
Air pollution control, ozone layer preservation; marine pollution control. 
Kontrola onesnaževanja zraka, ohranjanje ozonskega plašča, obvladovanje onesnaževanja morja.
Including natural reserves and actions in the surrounding areas; other measures to protect endangered or vulnerable species and their habitats (e.g. wetlands preservation). 
Vključno z naravnimi rezervati in ukrepi na okoliških območjih; drugi ukrepi za varstvo ogroženih in ranljivih vrst ter njihovih habitatov (npr. varstvo močvirij).
Applies to unique cultural landscape including sites/objects of historical, archaeological, aesthetic, scientific or educational value. 
Nanaša se na posebno kulturno krajino, vključno s kraji/objekti zgodovinske, arheološke, estetske, znanstvene ali izobraževalne vrednosti.
Including establishment of databases, inventories/accounts of physical and natural resources; environmental profiles and impact studies if not sector specific. 
Vključno z vzpostavitvijo podatkovnih baz, popisi/evidencami fizičnih in naravnih virov; okoljski profili in študije vplivov na okolje, če to ni vezano na določen sektor.