natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As a consequence, harmonised information across the EU is only available for those holdings which exceed the threshold of 25 000 euro annual standard output48. 
Posledično so usklajene informacije v celotni EU na voljo samo za gospodarstva, ki presegajo prag za letni standardni rezultat v višini 25 000 EUR48.
Comparisons of average income per worker across all holdings included in the FADN can thus lead to misinterpretation about the income situation of farmers across Member States. 
Primerjave povprečnega dohodka na delavca po vseh gospodarstvih, vključenih v FADN, lahko tako privedejo do napačne razlage dohodkovnega položaja kmetov po državah članicah.
50 The FADN was set up to observe incomes and business operations of agricultural holdings. 
50 Mreža FADN je bila ustanovljena za spremljanje dohodkov in poslovnih operacij kmetijskih gospodarstev.
However, the selection of holdings does not take into account if they are beneficiaries of EU support. 
Vendar pa se pri izboru gospodarstev ne upošteva, ali so ti upravičenci do podpore EU.
This can mean that sufficiently representative information is not available on the effects of specific EU support measures and the income of specific groups such as young farmers49. 
To lahko pomeni, da ni na voljo dovolj reprezentativnih informacij o vplivih posebnih ukrepov podpore EU in dohodkih posebnih skupin, kot so mladi kmetje49.
Moreover, direct payments are not only paid to commercial farmers but also to a significant number of part-time or subsistence farmers who are outside the FADN’s scope. 
Poleg tega se neposredna plačila ne izplačujejo le komercialnim kmetom, ampak tudi številnim kmetom s polovičnim delovnim časom ali samooskrbnim kmetom, ki ne spadajo na področje uporabe FADN.
The Commission has little knowledge of the income and production activities of such smaller holdings, which range from 12 % of the beneficiaries of EU direct payments in Bulgaria to 79 % in Slovakia50. 
Komisija ima malo znanja o dohodkih in proizvodnih dejavnostih teh malih gospodarstev, katerih število se giblje med 12 % upravičencev do neposrednih plačil EU v Bolgariji in 79 % na Slovaškem50.
This limits the conclusions that can be drawn from the FADN results regarding the overall effects of the support measures on different holding categories51. 
To omejuje oblikovanje zaključkov o splošnih vplivih podpornih ukrepov na različne kategorije gospodarstev, ki jih je mogoče povzeti na podlagi rezultatov FADN51.
48 This is the threshold currently applied by Germany, France (Continental), Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Slovakia and the United Kingdom (England, Scotland and Wales). 
48 To je prag, ki ga trenutno uporabljajo Nemčija, Francija (celinska), Luksemburg, Nizozemska, Slovaška in Združeno kraljestvo (Anglija, Škotska in Wales).
49 This applies also to measures financed by the EAFRD. 
49 To velja tudi za ukrepe, ki jih financira EKSRP.
According to the Court’s survey, Denmark, Germany, Lithuania and the Netherlands already specifically include organic farms. 
Glede na anketo Sodišča Danska, Nemčija, Litva in Nizozemska že posebej vključujejo ekološke kmetije.
Germany, Hungary and Lithuania also pay specific attention to legal entities which produce a significant part of their agricultural output. 
Nemčija, Litva in Madžarska posebno pozornost namenjajo tudi pravnim subjektom, ki proizvajajo pomemben del svoje kmetijske proizvodnje.
Austria specifically selects mountain farms. 
Avstrija posebej izbira gorske kmetije.
Italy significantly extends the FADN sample to obtain more accurate data on the impact of rural development measures. 
Italija vzorec FADN bistveno razširi, da bi dobila točnejše podatke o učinku ukrepov za razvoj podeželja.
50 See the Table. 
50 Glej tabelo.
51 In the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany and Greece, the number of beneficiaries of direct payments was even higher than the number of holdings surveyed in the FSS, because the thresholds for inclusion in the FSS mostly exclude the smaller holdings which have no, or only very little, output. 
51 Na Češkem, Danskem, v Nemčiji in Grčiji je bilo število upravičencev do neposrednih plačil celo višje od števila gospodarstev, vključenih v raziskovanja strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev, saj pragovi za vključitev v ta raziskovanja večinoma izključujejo manjša gospodarstva, ki imajo zelo majhen rezultat ali pa ga sploh nimajo.
As a consequence, for a significant number of beneficiaries receiving payments from the EU budget, not only is there no data about their income, but also no structural data. 
Posledično za veliko število upravičencev, ki prejemajo plačila iz proračuna EU, ne obstajajo niti podatki o njihovih dohodkih niti strukturni podatki.
Observations 27 Coverage of farming population and CAP beneficiaries by FADN Member State Holdings in FSS 2010 National FADN threshold (in euro SO) Percentage of FSS holdings represented by FADN Percentage of CAP beneficiaries not represented by FADN Belgium 42 850 25 000 72% 30% Bulgaria 370 500 2 000 31% 12% Czech Republic 22 870 8 000 65% 39% Denmark 42 120 15 000 68% 51% Germany 299 150 25 000 65% 47% Ireland 139 900 8 000 74% 36% Greece 723 010 4 000 44% no information Spain 989 810 4 000 53% 61% Estonia 19 620 4 000 41% 55% France 516 110 25 0001 15 0002 57% 28% Italy 1 620 900 8 000 49% 38% Cyprus 38 860 4 000 26% no information Latvia 83 400 4 000 26% 67% Lithuania 199 930 4 000 27% 69% Luxembourg 2 210 25 000 73% 20% Hungary 576 840 4 000 18% 45% Malta 12 540 4 000 24% 37% Netherland 72 320 25 000 71% 25% Austria 150 160 8 000 62% 26% Poland 1 506 620 4 000 48% 50% Portugal 305 260 4 000 36% 53% Romania 3 859 030 2 000 27% no information Slovenia 74 640 4 000 54% 33% Slovakia 24 460 25 000 18% 79% Finland 63 880 8 000 61% 38% Sweden 71 100 15 000 39% 57% United Kingdom 186 650 25 0003 15 0004 50% 50% EU-27 12 014 740 1 Continental France 2 Guadeloupe, Martinique and La Réunion 3 Except Northern Ireland 4 Northern Ireland Source: ECA on the basis of Commission and survey data. 
Opažanja 27 Pokritost kmetijskega prebivalstva in upravičencev SKP glede na FADN Država članica Št. gospodarstev v FSS 2010 Nacionalni prag FADN (standardni rezultat, izražen v EUR) % gospodarstev v FSS, zastopanih v FADN % upravičencev SKP, ki niso zastopani v FADN Belgija 42 850 25 000 72% 30% Bolgarija 370 500 2 000 31% 12% Češka 22 870 8 000 65% 39% Danska 42 120 15 000 68% 51% Nemčija 299 150 25 000 65% 47% Irska 139 900 8 000 74% 36% Grčija 723 010 4 000 44% ni podatkov Španija 989 810 4 000 53% 61% Estonija 19 620 4 000 41% 55% Francija 516 110 25 0001 15 0002 57% 28% Italija 1 620 900 8 000 49% 38% Ciper 38 860 4 000 26% ni podatkov Latvija 83 400 4 000 26% 67% Litva 199 930 4 000 27% 69% Luksemburg 2 210 25 000 73% 20% Madžarska 576 840 4 000 18% 45% Malta 12 540 4 000 24% 37% Nizozemska 72 320 25 000 71% 25% Avstrija 150 160 8 000 62% 26% Poljska 1 506 620 4 000 48% 50% Portugalska 305 260 4 000 36% 53% Romunija 3 859 030 2 000 27% ni podatkov Slovenija 74 640 4 000 54% 33% Slovaška 24 460 25 000 18% 79% Finska 63 880 8 000 61% 38% Švedska 71 100 15 000 39% 57% Združeno kraljestvo 186 650 25 0003 15 0004 50% 50% EU-27 12 014 740 1 Celinska Francija. 2 Guadeloupe, Martinik in Reunion. 3 Razen Severne Irske.
Table Observations 28 51 In addition, information on EU support from the EAGF is not surveyed in the FSS and only a few Member States have a unique holding identification number which would make it possible to link FSS and FADN data with administrative data such as those from the integrated administration and control system on support payments and areas farmed. 
Tabela Opažanja 28 51 Poleg tega informacije o podpori EU iz EKJS v raziskovanjih strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev niso raziskane in samo nekaj držav članic je uvedlo edinstvene identifikacijske številke gospodarstva, ki bi omogočile povezavo med podatki iz raziskovanja strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev in FADN na eni strani z upravnimi podatki, kot so podatki iz integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema o plačilih podpore in obdelanih površinah, na drugi strani.
Such a link would allow information on EU income support to be combined with data on agricultural structures and land use. 
Takšna povezava bi omogočila združitev informacij o dohodkovni podpori EU s podatki o kmetijskih strukturah in uporabi zemljišč.
This would also help to better understand the factors determining farmers’ incomes and also reduce the administrative burden on the respondents. 
To bi prispevalo tudi k boljšemu razumevanju dejavnikov, ki določajo dohodke kmetov, pa tudi zmanjšalo upravno breme za anketirance.
The Commission and Member States did not always ensure that available data on farmers’ incomes were of an appropriate quality 52 The treaty establishes the basic principles for European statistics, which should be impartial, reliable, objective, scientifically independent, cost-effective and confidential52. 
Komisija in države članice niso vedno zagotovile ustrezne kakovosti razpoložljivih podatkov o dohodkih kmetov 52 Pogodba določa osnovna načela za evropsko statistiko, ki mora biti nepristranska, zanesljiva, objektivna, znanstveno neodvisna, stroškovno učinkovita in zaupna52.
The principles are further elaborated in the European statistics code of practice adhered to by both the Member States and the Commission. 
Načela so nadalje opredeljena v Kodeksu ravnanja evropske statistike, ki ga morajo spoštovati tako države članice kot Komisija.
Its implementation is facilitated by a quality assurance framework. 
Njegovo izvajanje omogoča okvir za zagotavljanje kakovosti.
However, neither the code of practice nor the quality assurance framework is mandatory. 
Vendar niti kodeks ravnanja niti okvir za zagotavljanje kakovosti nista obvezna.
The specific criteria applying to the quality of the statistical information produced are set out in Annex V. 53 To assess whether the data on farmers’ incomes were sound, the Court audited the arrangements in place to ensure inter alia the quality of the statistical data from the EAAs and the FADN, as provided in the European statistics code of practice. 
Posebna merila, ki se nanašajo na kakovost pripravljenih statističnih informacij, so določena v Prilogi V. 53 Za oceno, ali so podatki o dohodkih kmetov zanesljivi, je Sodišče revidiralo uvedene ureditve, ki naj bi med drugim zagotovile kakovost statističnih podatkov iz ERK in FADN, kot je določeno v Kodeksu ravnanja evropske statistike.
52 Article 338(2) TFEU. 
52 Člen 338(2) PDEU.
Observations 29 There were weaknesses in the Commission’s management of the EAAs ... 
Opažanja 29 V načinu, kako Komisija upravlja ERK, obstajajo slabosti ...
The Commission had insufficient up-to-date information about the methodology and data sources that the Member States use for compiling the EAAs 54 The information about EAA methodology and data sources (known as ‘invento-ries’) provided to the Commission by Member States varied significantly in terms of detail and quality and had not been updated since 2006, while for three Member States no such inventories were available. 
Komisija ima na voljo premalo posodobljenih informacij o metodologiji in virih podatkov, ki jih države članice uporabljajo za sestavljanje ERK 54 Informacije v zvezi z metodologijo in viri podatkov ERK (imenovane popisi), ki jih Komisiji predložijo države članice, se precej razlikujejo glede natančnosti in kakovosti ter niso bile posodobljene od leta 2006, za tri države članice pa ti popisi sploh niso bili na voljo.
In all six Member States visited, procedures and data sources for material items varied significantly and no longer matched the description in the inventories. 
V vseh šestih obiskanih državah članicah so se postopki in viri podatkov za pomembne postavke precej razlikovali ter niso več ustrezali opisu v popisih.
As a result, the Commission cannot verify whether statistical information submitted by Member States is sufficiently harmonised and comparable and its capacity to establish recommendations and develop guidelines in order to improve the overall quality of statistical information is reduced. 
Komisija zato ne more preveriti, ali so statistični podatki, ki so jih predložile države članice, dovolj usklajeni in primerljivi, zmanjšana pa je tudi njena sposobnost, da oblikuje priporočila in smernice za izboljšanje splošne kakovosti statističnih informacij.
55 The main EAA indicators compare agricultural income at the level of the labour input of the persons employed in agriculture (expressed in agricultural working units)53. 
55 Glavni kazalniki ERK primerjajo kmetijski dohodek na ravni vložka dela zaposlenih v kmetijstvu (izraženi v kmetijskih delovnih enotah)53.
Eurostat had insufficient up-to-date information about the methodologies used by Member States, which reduced its ability to assess the accuracy and comparability of the information received. 
Eurostat je imel premalo posodobljenih informacij o metodologijah, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, zaradi česar se je zmanjšala njegova zmožnost za oceno točnosti in primerljivosti prejetih informacij.
Moreover, working hours laid down by Member States varied between 1 600 annual hours in France and 2 120 hours in Poland, which also affected the comparability of the results. 
Poleg tega se je razlikovalo tudi število delovnih ur, ki jih določajo države članice, saj se je gibalo med 1 600 urami letno v Franciji in 2 120 urami na Poljskem, kar je tudi vplivalo tudi na primerljivost rezultatov.
53 Calculated by dividing the global income by the total number of persons who work in agriculture either as salaried workers or as independent farmers. 
53 Izračunajo se tako, da se celotni dohodek deli s skupnim številom oseb, ki delajo v kmetijstvu bodisi kot zaposleni bodisi kot neodvisni kmetovalci.
Observations 30 The reporting of agricultural income to Eurostat was affected by shortcomings ... 
Opažanja 30 Na poročanje o kmetijskih dohodkih Eurostatu so vplivale pomanjkljivosti...
56 The Court found various instances where data disclosed in the EAAs were not sufficiently accurate or comparable, which substantially affected the calculation of the income disclosed in the EAAs. 
56 Sodišče je odkrilo različne primere, v katerih podatki, razkriti v ERK, niso bili dovolj natančni ali primerljivi ter so znatno vplivali na izračun dohodkov, razkritih v ERK.
For example, inconsistencies were found in accounting for certain products such as wine and olive oil, rents for agricultural land, the disclosure of certain non-agricultural activities, accounting for subsidies and the calculation of the agricultural entrepreneurial income (see Box 3). 
Ugotovljene so bile na primer neskladnosti pri obračunavanju nekaterih proizvodov, kot sta vino in oljčno olje, najemnin za kmetijska zemljišča, razkritju nekaterih nekmetijskih dejavnosti, obračunavanju subvencij in izračunu podjetniškega dohodka kmetijstva (glej okvir 3).
Examples of shortcomings in the calculation of agricultural income In Poland, the statistical office included in the EAAs only the estimate of the rents which farmers paid for state-owned land, which did not include the value of land leased from private landowners, as this is not known by the authorities. 
Primeri pomanjkljivosti pri izračunu kmetijskih dohodkov Na Poljskem je statistični urad v ERK vključil samo ocene najemnin, ki so jih kmetje plačali za zemljišča v državni lasti, ki niso vključevale vrednosti zemljišč v zakupu, ki so bila v lasti zasebnikov, saj organi podatkov o tem nimajo.
Based on the FADN results, the Court estimates that such land, however, covers around 61 % of the rented agricultural area in Poland. 
Sodišče pa na podlagi rezultatov FADN ocenjuje, da taka zemljišča zajemajo približno 61 % najete kmetijske površine na Poljskem.
Similarly, in Romania, the statistical office included only data on the value of land leased by farm companies but not by individual farmers. 
Podobno je romunski statistični urad vključil le podatke o vrednosti zemljišč, ki jih imajo v zakupu kmetijske družbe, ne pa posamezni kmetje.
Many holdings are engaged in the processing of agricultural goods such as production of cheese, forestry products, logging or agri-tourism. 
Številna gospodarstva se ukvarjajo s predelavo kmetijskega blaga, na primer s proizvodnjo sira, gozdarskih proizvodov, s sečnjo ali kmečkim turizmom.
The value of such activities has to be included in the EAAs, if they are inseparable from the agricultural activities. 
Vrednost teh dejavnosti je treba vključiti v ERK, če jih ni mogoče ločiti od kmetijskih dejavnosti.
However, for many Member States no data on the value of such activities are available. 
Vendar pa za mnoge države članice ni podatkov o vrednosti teh dejavnosti.
In Romania, the statistical office recorded area-related subsidies in the year when they were paid to the farmers (cash based). 
V Romuniji je statistični urad evidentiral subvencije na površino v letu, ko so bile izplačane kmetom (na podlagi plačil).
According to the applicable standards, the subsidies should have been recorded for the year when the farmer introduced the aid application (accrual principle). 
V skladu z veljavnimi standardi je treba subvencije evidentirati za leto, ko je kmet dal vlogo za pomoč (obračunsko načelo).
In France, data on fees for specific forms of tenant farming (‘fermage’) paid to owner shareholders were outdated and not correctly taken into account for the calculation of the agricultural entrepreneurial income. 
V Franciji so bili podatki o pristojbinah za posebne oblike kmetovanja na najetem zemljišču (fermage), plačanih lastnikom deležnikom, zastareli in se niso pravilno upoštevali pri izračunu podjetniškega dohodka kmetijstva.
This form of farming covers more than half of the agricultural area utilised in France. Box 3 
Ta oblika kmetovanja se v Franciji uporablja na več kot polovici kmetijskih zemljišč v uporabi. Okvir 3
Observations 31 57 Member States have to communicate definitive income data by the end of September of the following year54. 
Opažanja 31 57 Države članice morajo dokončne podatke o dohodkih sporočiti do konca septembra naslednjega leta54.
However, Member States frequently modified their data in subsequent years, which had a material impact on the incomes disclosed in the EAAs55. 
Vendar pa so države članice v letih, ki so sledila, pogosto spremenile svoje podatke, kar je pomembno vplivalo na dohodke, razkrite v ERK55.
The updates were mostly explained by the need to correct errors in the previously reported data, the late availability of source data or the fact that better data sources now provided more accurate information. 
Posodobitve so bile večinoma utemeljene s potrebo po odpravi napak v predhodno sporočenih podatkih, pozno razpoložljivostjo izvirnih podatkov ali s tem, da boljši viri podatkov zdaj zagotavljajo natančnejše informacije.
Although revisions of statistical data are a standard procedure in the establishment of statistics, the updates highlight weaknesses in the procedures for compiling the EAAs in the Member States and reduce the reliability of the Commission’s main performance indicators for income. 
Čeprav so popravki statističnih podatkov standardni postopek za pripravo statističnih podatkov, pa posodobitve kažejo na slabosti v postopkih za sestavljanje ERK v državah članicah in zmanjšujejo zanesljivost glavnih kazalnikov smotrnosti poslovanja za dohodke, ki jih uporablja Komisija.
Quality assurance is not fully effective 58 While Eurostat made efforts to improve the quality of the EAAs, no exhaustive and independent assessment has been conducted as to whether Member States have set up an effective quality assurance framework for EAA data collection and compilation. 
Zagotavljanje kakovosti ni povsem uspešno 58 Eurostat si je sicer prizadeval za izboljšanje kakovosti ERK, vendar ni izčrpne in neodvisne ocene o tem, ali so države članice vzpostavile uspešen okvir za zagotavljanje kakovosti pri zbiranju in pripravi podatkov za ERK.
In 2010 Eurostat initiated a joint task force to identify EAA quality indicators and define standards for quality reports. 
Leta 2010 je Eurostat ustanovil skupno delovno skupino, ki naj bi opredelila kazalnike kakovosti ERK in določila standarde za poročila o kakovosti.
In 2012, it coordinated a self-assessment of the national bodies in charge of their compilation. 
Leta 2012 je usklajeval samoocenjevanje nacionalnih organov, odgovornih za njihovo zbiranje.
On this occasion, Member States were asked to provide their overall assessments of EAA data quality and indicate needs for improvement. 
Ob tej priložnosti so morale države članice predložiti svoje skupne ocene kakovosti podatkov za ERK in navesti, kaj je treba izboljšati.
The Court observed that in this exercise four Member States56 had not submitted any reports, which left Eurostat without updated and complete information on the quality of the EAA data submitted. ... and in some Member States there were weaknesses in the operation of the FADN The technical implementation of the FADN survey can affect the quality of the results 59 Generally, three FADN survey systems can be distinguished. 
Sodišče je pri tem ugotovilo, da štiri države člani-ce56 niso predložile nobenega poročila, zaradi česar Eurostat ni imel posodobljenih in popolnih informacij o kakovosti predloženih podatkov za ERK. ... v nekaterih državah članicah pa obstajajo slabosti pri delovanju FADN Tehnično izvajanje raziskovanj FADN lahko vpliva na kakovost rezultatov 59 Na splošno obstajajo trije sistemi raziskovanj v okviru FADN.
In one group of Member States, the national FADN liaison agencies acquire data from private accounting firms, which keep the accounts of individual holdings and use the data also for the farmers’ income tax declarations57. 
V prvi skupini držav članic nacionalni organi za zvezo FADN pridobijo podatke od zasebnih računovodskih podjetij, ki vodijo računovodstvo posameznih gospodarstev, in podatke uporabljajo tudi za napovedi za odmero davka na dohodek kmetov57.
In a second group, the liaison agency is directly involved in keeping the accounts for FADN purposes and is in direct contact with the farmers58. 
V drugi skupini je organ za zvezo neposredno vključen v vodenje računovodstva za namene FADN in je v neposrednem stiku s kmeti58.
In a third group, the national liaison agencies contract private data collectors, who collect data directly from the holdings59. 
V tretji skupini nacionalni organi za zvezo najamejo zasebne zbiralce podatkov, ki podatke zbirajo neposredno od gospodarstev59.
54 Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 138/2004. 
54 Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št.
55 So for Romania the 2014 correction of the agricultural entrepreneurial income result for 2012 led to an increase of 129 %, for Denmark 104 %, for Luxembourg 48 %, for Italy 27 % and for Belgium 23 %. For Germany, on the other hand, income decreased by 23 % and for France by 12 %. 
55 Tako so leta 2014 popravki rezultatov podjetniškega dohodka kmetijstva za leto 2012 za Romunijo privedli do 129-odstotnega povečanja, za Dansko do 104-odstotnega povečanja, za Luksemburg do 48-odstotnega povečanja, za Italijo do 27-odstotnega in za Belgijo do 23-odstotnega povečanja, medtem ko so se za Nemčijo dohodki zmanjšali za23%inzaFrancijoza12%.
Factor income changed significantly in Belgium (+ 12 %), Germany (– 13 %), Italy (+ 10 %), Luxembourg (+ 28 %), Latvia (+ 43 %) and the Netherlands (+ 13 %). 
Faktorski dohodek se je bistveno spremenil v Belgiji (+ 12 %), Nemčiji (– 13 %), Italiji (+ 10 %), Luksemburgu (+28%),Latviji(+43%)inna Nizozemskem (+ 13 %).
56 Belgium, Germany, Cyprus and United Kingdom. 
56 Belgija, Nemčija, Ciper in Združeno kraljestvo.
57 E.g. in Germany and France. 
57 Npr. v Nemčiji in Franciji.
58 E.g. in the Netherlands. 
58 Npr. na Nizozemskem.
59 E.g. 
59 Npr. v Španiji, na Poljskem in v Romuniji.
Observations 32 60 A directly managed system contributes to a high level of data quality. 
Opažanja 32 60 Neposredno upravljan sistem prispeva k visoki ravni kakovosti podatkov.