natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, according to the results of DG COMP’s monitoring exercises carried out during 2006‐2014, several Member States had a higher frequency of problems in the design and implementation of aid measures than the ones which concluded that they did not fulfil the State aid ex ante conditionalities (see paragraph 55). 
V skladu z rezultati dejavnosti spremljanja GD COMP v obdobju 2006–2014 imajo nekatere države članice pogosteje težave pri zasnovi in izvajanju ukrepov pomoči kot države članice, ki so ugotovile, da ne izpolnjujejo predhodnih pogojenosti za državno pomoč (glej odstavek 55).
Alternative approval procedure for major projects may improve clearance of State aid issues within the Commission, but is not designed always to provide legal certainty to Member States 106 For the 2007‐2013 programme period, major projects were adopted by the Com‐ mission after it reviewed the project applications sent by the Member States (see paragraphs 66 to 71). 
Alternativni postopek odobritve za velike projekte lahko izboljša odobritev zadev v zvezi z državno pomočjo znotraj Komisije, vendar ni zasnovan tako, da bi vedno zagotavljal pravno varnost za države članice 106 Komisija je za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 sprejela velike projekte, ko je pregledala projektne vloge, ki so jih poslale države članice (glej odstavke 66 do 71).
In the 2014‐2020 programme period a second, alternative approval procedure for major projects was introduced by the Common Provi‐ sions Regulation83, where the application is appraised by an independent expert before being notified to the Commission by the Member State (see Box 9). 
Za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 je bil z uredbo o skupnih določbah83 uveden alternativni postopek odobritve za velike projekte, pri katerem vlogo oceni neodvisen strokovnjak, preden jo države članice priglasijo Komisiji (glej okvir 9).
Use of the alternative procedure is optional; as of June 2016, only one major project application had been submitted under the alternative procedure. 
Uporaba alternativnega postopka ni obvezna, do vključno junija 2016 pa je bila v skladu z njim predložena samo ena vloga za veliki projekt.
82 Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
82 Člen 19 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
83 Article 101 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
83 Člen 101 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
Observations 56 Appointment of an independent expert and validation of the independent quality review The independent expert reviews the major project proposal. 
Opažanja 56 Imenovanje neodvisnega strokovnjaka in potrjevanje neodvisnega pregleda kakovosti Neodvisni strokovnjak pregleda predlog za veliki projekt.
This review includes an analysis of the aid character of the measure and its compatibility with the internal market. 
Pregled vključuje analizo narave ukrepa pomoči in njegove združljivosti z notranjim trgom.
If the project application is assessed positively, the managing authority can approve the major project and send it to the Commission. 
Če je projektna vloga pozitivno ocenjena, lahko organ upravljanja veliki projekt odobri in ga pošlje Komisiji.
The Com‐ mission can object to the project approval within three months if it establishes a ‘significant weakness’ in the independent quality review report. 
Komisija lahko v treh mesecih izrazi nasprotovanje odobritvi projekta, če pri neodvisnem pregledu kakovosti ugotovi „bistvene slabosti”.
The expert is chosen by the Member State, subject to Commission approval. 
Strokovnjaka izbere država članica, njegovo imenovanje pa mora potrditi Komisija.
The Commission has already pre‐ approved an expert group called ‘Joint assistance to support projects in European regions’ (JASPERS)84. 
Komisija je že vnaprej odobrila skupino strokovnjakov JASPERS84 (skupna pomoč pri podpori projektov v evropskih regijah).
84 JASPERS is a technical assistance partnership between DG REGIO, the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. 
84 JASPERS je partnerstvo za tehnično pomoč med GD REGIO, Evropsko investicijsko banko in Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj.
It is provided to Member States free of charge. 
Državam članicam se zagotovi brezplačno.
107 This alternative procedure for major projects may improve clearance of State aid issues within the Commission, but is not designed always to provide legal certainty for Member States with regard to State aid compliance at the time the major project decision is taken. 
107 Ta alternativni postopek za velike projekte lahko izboljša odobritev zadev v zvezi z državno pomočjo, vendar ni zasnovan tako, da bi za države članice v času sprejetja sklepa o velikem projektu vedno zagotavljal pravno varnost v zvezi s skladnostjo s pravili o državni pomoči.
That certainty can only be obtained on the basis of a Member State notification followed by a Commission State aid decision (see paragraph 70). 
Ta varnost je mogoča samo na podlagi priglasitve države članice in sklepa o državni pomoči, ki ga nato sprejme Komisija (glej odstavek 70).
A State aid common action plan set up by the Commission aims to strengthen the administrative capacity of Member States and requires continuous attention 108 In March 2015, DG COMP and DG REGIO agreed on a State aid common action plan85. 
Skupni akcijski načrt o državni pomoči, ki ga je pripravila Komisija, je namenjen krepitvi upravne zmogljivosti držav članic in zahteva stalno pozornost 108 GD COMP in GD REGIO sta se marca 2015 dogovorila o skupnem akcijskem načrtu za državno pomoč85.
109 The action plan originally comprised six actions intended to raise awareness and improve knowhow in the field of State aid in all Member States: identification and dissemination of good practice, training courses for State aid specialists, country‐specific workshops, seminars for specialists, the further development of a question‐and‐answer database (the ECN‐ET network86) and the development of a State aid information database. 
109 Akcijski načrt je prvotno vseboval šest ukrepov, katerih namen sta ozaveščanje in izboljšanje strokovnega znanja o državni pomoči v vseh državah članicah. Ti so opredeljevanje in razširjanje dobrih praks, usposabljanja za specialiste za državno pomoč, delavnice za posamezne države, seminarji za specialiste, dodaten razvoj podatkovne zbirke z vprašanji in odgovori (mreža ECN-ET86) in razvoj informacijske podatkovne zbirke o državni pomoči.
In 2016, the Commission added a seventh action (see Table 8). 
Komisija je leta 2016 dodala še sedmi ukrep (glej tabelo 8).
85 ‘Strengthening administrative capacity for the management of the funds of Member States in the field of State aid – a common action plan’, adopted by the Commission 18 March 2015. 
85 Strengthening administrative capacity for the management of the funds of Member States in the field of State aid – a common action plan (Krepitev upravne zmogljivosti za upravljanje finančnih sredstev držav članic na področju državne pomoči – skupni akcijski načrt), ki ga je Komisija sprejela 18. marca 2015.
86 The European Competition Network ‐ Electronic Transmission (ECN‐ET) is an electronic interface where Member States can ask State aid‐related questions to DG COMP. 
86 Evropska mreža za konkurenco – elektronski prenos (ECN-ET) je elektronski vmesnik, kjer lahko države članice GD COMP zastavijo vprašanja o državni pomoči.
In general, both the questions and DG COMP’s replies are published for all Member States to see. 
Običajno so objavljeni tako vprašanja kot odgovori GD COMP, da jih lahko preberejo vse države članice.
An example of an exception to publication is where a very specific case is not useful to other Member States. 
Izjemoma se ne objavijo npr. v zelo specifičnih primerih, ko niso uporabni za druge države članice.
Observations 57 The Commission’s State aid common action plan Number Action and deadline Description State of play as of August 2016 1 Identification and dissemination of good practice Early outcomes expected by Q2 2015 Compiling an inventory of effective tools existing in various Member States to build administrative capacity and to identify good practices which can be shared. 
Opažanja 57 Skupni akcijski načrt za državno pomoč Komisije Št. Ukrep in rok Opis Stanje avgusta 2016 1 Opredeljevanje in razširjanje dobrih praks Prvi rezultati pričakovani do drugega četrtletja 2015. Popis uspešnih orodij, ki obstajajo v različnih državah članicah za izgradnjo upravne zmogljivosti in ugotavljanje dobrih praks, ki se lahko delijo.
Finalised in 2016 2 Training for national State aid specialist on European Structural and Investment Funds1 Q2 2015 A one-day training session tailor-made for national State aid specialists to be held in Brussels. 
Dokončano leta 2016 2 Usposabljanje za nacionalne specialiste za državno pomoč o evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladih1 Drugo četrtletje 2015. Enodnevno usposabljanje, prilagojeno nacionalnim specialistom za državno pomoč, ki bo potekalo v Bruslju.
Has not taken place as of August 2016. 
Avgusta 2016 še ni bilo izvedeno.
3 Country-specific workshops Starting from Q2 2015 Organising interactive country-specific seminars in Member States which do not fulfil the ex ante conditionality on state aid or where serious bottlenecks were identified. 
Organizacija interaktivnih seminarjev v posameznih državah članicah, ki ne izpolnjujejo predhodnih pogojenosti za državno pomoč ali v katerih so bila odkrita resna ozka grla.
Seminars have been organised in 2014 (Spain) and 2015 (Bulgaria Croatia, the Czech Republic, Italy, Romania and Slovakia). 
Seminarji so bili organizirani leta 2014 (v Španiji) in leta 2015 (v Bolgariji, na Hrvaškem, v Češki republiki, v Italiji, Romuniji in na Slovaškem).
4 Seminars for specialists, internet training courses Continuous action Disseminating knowledge through very specific, tailor-made seminars focused on a particular topic/issue. 
4 Seminarji za specialiste, spletna usposabljanja Stalen ukrep Razširjanje znanja z zelo specifičnimi, prilagojenimi seminarji, ki so osredotočeni na določeno temo/ vprašanje.
A thematic workshop for Research, Development and Innovation took place in Brussels in January 2016. 
Januarja 2016 je v Bruslju potekala tematska delavnica za raziskave, razvoj in inovacije.
5 Development of question-and-answer database Continuous action Providing guidance regarding the interpretation of the new rules to all national State aid specialists through a shared IT platform fully managed by DG COMP. 
Stalen ukrep Zagotavljanje smernic za razlago novih pravil vsem nacionalnim specialistom za državno pomoč prek skupne platforme IT, ki jo v celoti upravlja GD COMP.
More than 600 questions and answers have been submitted as of June 2016; these are being migrated to the eState aid wiki (see action 6). 
Do vključno junija 2016 je bilo oddanih več kot 600 vprašanj in odgovorov, ki se sedaj selijo na eState aid wiki (glej ukrep 6).
6 Development of State aid wiki Continuous action A number of pages summarising the relevant questions asked through the ECN-ET. 
6 Razvoj strani wiki o državni pomoči (State aid wiki) Stalen ukrep Več strani, na katerih so povzeta pomembna vprašanja, zastavljena prek mreže ECN-ET.
Went online in February 2016 and is called eState aid wiki. 
Na spletu je dostopna od februarja 2016, imenuje pa se eState aid wiki.
Around 270 questions and answers had been posted as of June 2016. 
Do vključno junija 2016 je bilo objavljenih okoli 270 vprašanj in odgovorov.
7 Development of a dedicated training module A series of two-day State aid training sessionsis under development by DG REGIO/DG EMPL and DG COMP together with the European Institute of Public Administration. 
7 Razvoj posebnega modula usposabljanja GD REGIO/GD EMPL in GD COMP z Evropskim inštitutom za javno upravo razvijajo serijo dvodnevnih usposabljanj na področju državne pomoči.
Two training sessions will take place in Brussels in November and December 2016; more can be added based on Member State demand. 
Dva tečaja usposabljanja bosta potekala v Bruslju novembra in decembra 2016, več pa se jih lahko doda na podlagi povpraševanja držav članic.
The target group is European Structural and Investment Fund practitioners with some experience of State aid. 
Ciljna skupina so izvajalci evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov z nekaj izkušnjami na področju državne pomoči.
Intended for November and December 2016 1 The European Structural Investment Funds are the ERDF, the CF, the ESF, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, and the Euro‐ pean Maritime and Fisheries Fund. 
Načrtovano za november in december 2016 1 Evropski strukturni in investicijski skladi so Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR), Kohezijski sklad, Evropski socialni sklad (ESS), Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) in Evropski sklad za pomorstvo in ribištvo.
Source: European Court of Auditors, based on Commission information. 
Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi informacij Komisije.
Table 8 
Tabela 8
Observations 58 110 Out of the seven actions in the State aid common action plan, actions 1 and 3 had been fully implemented; actions 5 and 6 had been implemented and are supposed to function on a continuous basis. 
Opažanja 58 110 Od sedmih ukrepov iz skupnega akcijskega načrta za državno pomoč sta bila ukrepa 1 in 3 v celoti izvedena, ukrepa 5 in 6 pa sta se izvedla in naj bi se stalno izvajala.
The remaining three actions had not been implemented as of August 2016: one was in the process of being rolled out (action 4) and two were yet to start (actions 2 and 7). 
Preostali trije ukrepi avgusta 2016 še niso bili izvedeni. Eden je bil v postopku uvedbe (ukrep 4), dva pa se še nista začela (ukrepa 2 in7).
111 In addition we found that DG REGIO and DG EMPL had significantly increased the total number of training courses provided from 5 in the 2012‐2013 period to 17 in the 2014‐2015 period. 
111 Poleg tega je Sodišče ugotovilo, da sta GD REGIO in GD EMPL bistveno povečala skupno število usposabljanj s petih v obdobju 2012–2013 na 17 v obdobju 2014– 2015.
DG COMP organised 37 training courses on the reform of State aid legislation for the 2014‐2020 programme period in 2014 and 2015 on the request of 19 Member States87. 
GD COMP je v letih 2014 in 2015 na zahtevo 19 držav članic87 organiziral 37 usposabljanj o reformi zakonodaje o državni pomoči za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.
In addition, by January 2016 DG COMP had organ‐ ised training courses on State aid and infrastructure for five Member States88. 
Poleg tega je do januarja 2016 organiziral usposabljanja o državni pomoči in infrastrukturi za pet držav članic88.
112 The State aid common action plan and the increase in training activities provided by the Commission are part of a concerted effort to improve Member States’ compliance with State aid rules, partially as a response to their increased re‐ sponsibilities in the area of State aid. 
112 Skupni akcijski načrt za državno pomoč in povečanje števila dejavnosti usposabljanja, ki jih zagotavlja Komisija, sta del usklajenih prizadevanj za izboljšanje skladnosti s pravili o državni pomoči v državah članicah, kar je delno odziv na njihove večje odgovornosti na področju državne pomoči.
These initiatives are important to mitigate the risk of increasing the Member States’ role in designing and implementing aid measures. 
Te pobude so pomembne za blažitev tveganja zaradi večje vloge držav članic pri zasnovi in izvajanju ukrepov pomoči.
Our survey results show that the eState aid wiki in particular was received very positively. It has been used extensively by Member States: as of 30 June 2016, about 270 questions and answers had been posted89. 113 The extent to which these actions will lead to improvements in the detection and prevention of State aid errors in the Member States can only be assessed in the future. 
Rezultati naše raziskave kažejo, da je bila zlasti viki o državni pomoči eState aid wiki sprejeta zelo pozitivno in da jo države članice veliko uporabljajo, saj je bilo do 30. junija 2016 objavljenih okoli 270 vprašanj in odgovorov.89 113 Koliko bodo ti ukrepi izboljšali odkrivanje in preprečevanje napak pri državni pomoči v državah članicah, bo mogoče oceniti šele v prihodnosti.
87 All Member States except Denmark, Ireland, Greece, Cyprus, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands and Austria. 
87 Zahteva vseh držav članic razen Danske, Irske, Grčije, Cipra, Litve, Luksemburga, Malte, Nizozemske in Avstrije.
88 Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Romania and Slovakia. 
88 Bolgarija, Hrvaška, Češka republika, Romunija in Slovaška.
89 Over 600 questions and answers had been posted in the preceding ECN‐ET network; these are being migrated to the eState aid wiki. 
89 Na prejšnji mreži ECN-ET je bilo objavljenih več kot 600 vprašanj in odgovorov, ki se sedaj selijo na eState aid wiki.
Conclusions and 59 recommendations 114 Since 2010, our audits in cohesion policy found a significant level of non‐compli‐ ance with State aid rules. 
Zaključki in priporočila 59 114 Z našimi revizijami na področju kohezijske politike od leta 2010 ugotavljamo bistveno stopnjo neskladnosti s pravili o državni pomoči.
This report points to a need for more awareness of the applicable rules at Member State level and for continued Commission support to effectively prevent, detect and correct infringements of State aid rules. 
V tem poročilu opozarjamo na potrebo po večji ozaveščenosti o veljavnih pravilih na ravni držav članic ter po stalni podpori Komisije za uspešno preprečevanje, odkrivanje in popravljanje kršitev pravil o državni pomoči.
Overall, we found that: (a) Over the 2010‐2014 period, the Commission and the Court of Auditors de‐ tected infringements of State aid rules in a significant number of our audits; State aid errors in ERDF and CF were an important factor contributing to our estimated level of error in cohesion policy. 
Na splošno je bilo ugotovljeno: (a) Komisija in Sodišče sta v obdobju 2010–2014 pri številnih revizijah odkrila kršitve pravil o državni pomoči. Napake pri državni pomoči v okviru ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada so pomembno prispevale k naši ocenjeni stopnji napake na področju kohezijske politike.
This indicates that, so far, audit authorities have not focused sufficiently on State aid in the course of their audits. (b) During the 2007‐2013 programme period the Commission did not record the State aid errors it detected or those reported by Member States in a way which allowed it to perform a proper analysis. 
To pomeni, da se revizijski organi pri svojih revizijah doslej niso dovolj osredotočali na državno pomoč; (b) Komisija v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 napak pri državni pomoči, ki jih je odkrila sama ali so jih sporočile države članice, ni beležila tako, da bi lahko izvedla ustrezno analizo.
Such an analysis could have helped the Commission to develop more focused and tailor‐made preventive measures for Member States and programmes. (c) Particularly in the beginning of the 2007‐2013 programme period, the Com‐ mission did not systematically verify major projects for State aid compliance. There is a risk that some EU co‐financed major projects are incompatible with the internal market, also due to the fact that prior to 2012, and the clarifica‐ tion provided by the Leipzig Halle judgment, Member States rarely notified investments in infrastructure to the Commission. 
Taka analiza bi Komisiji lahko pomagala razviti bolj osredotočene in prilagojene preventivne ukrepe za države članice in programe; (c) Komisija zlasti na začetku programskega obdobja 2007–2013 ni sistematično preverjala skladnosti velikih projektov s pravili o državni pomoči, zato obstaja tveganje, da so nekateri veliki projekti, ki jih je sofinancirala EU, nezdružljivi z notranjim trgom. Med drugim tudi zato, ker so države članice pred letom 2012 in pojasnili, ki jih je prinesla sodba v zadevi Leipzig/Halle, Komisijo redko obveščale o infrastrukturnih naložbah.
In order to mitigate this risk for the future, the Commission stepped up its internal preventive measures and it introduced an alternative approval procedure including an Independ‐ ent Quality Review for the 2014‐2020 programme period. 
Komisija je za zmanjšanje tega tveganja za prihodnost okrepila svoje interne preventivne ukrepe in uvedla alternativni postopek odobritve, vključno z neodvisnim pregledom kakovosti za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.
According to the Commission, independent of the procedure used by the Member State, major projects will only be approved after internal State aid clearance. (d) The Commission has taken actions to simplify the applicable State aid legisla‐ tion for the 2014‐2020 programme period which have resulted in a reduction of administrative burdens and more transparency, but have also increased Member States’ responsibilities for designing and implementing aid meas‐ ures. 
Po navedbah Komisije bodo neodvisno od postopkov, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, veliki projekti odobreni šele po interni odobritvi državne pomoči; (d) Komisija je sprejela ukrepe za poenostavitev veljavne zakonodaje o državni pomoči za programsko obdobje 2014–2020, ki so zmanjšali upravno breme in prinesli večjo preglednost, vendar je z njimi povečala tudi odgovornosti držav članic pri zasnovi in izvajanju ukrepov pomoči.
Member States getting more responsibility risks increasing the number of State aid errors: the Commission’s monitoring has shown that Member States made many mistakes in the design and implementation of aid schemes in the 2007‐2013 programme period. 
Povečanje odgovornosti držav članic je prineslo tveganje za pogostejše napake pri državni pomoči, saj je Komisija pri spremljanju odkrila, da so države članice pri zasnovi in izvajanju shem pomoči v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 napravile veliko napak.
To mitigate this risk, the Commission has taken actions to promote Member States’ administrative capacity in the area of State aid, including the introduction of pre‐conditions for State aid systems to promote the efficient and effective implementation of European Structural and Investment Funds (‘ex ante conditionalities’). 
Za zmanjšanje tega tveganja je sprejela ukrepe za spodbujanje upravne zmogljivosti držav članic na področju državne pomoči, vključno z uvedbo osnovnih pogojev za sisteme državne pomoči, s katerimi naj bi spodbudila učinkovito in uspešno izvajanje evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov (tj. predhodne pogojenosti).
Conclusions and recommendations 60 No comprehensive overview of State aid errors by the Commission, insufficient Member State focus on State aid and insignificant recovery of State aid following the Commission’s monitoring exercises 115 Over the 2010‐2014 period, we found a significant number of cases of non‐ compliance with State aid rules in 269 projects audited in the area of cohesion to which these rules applied; State aid errors were an important factor contributing to our estimated level of error in cohesion policy. 
Poleg tega je treba te ukrepe stalno spremljati. Zaključki in priporočila 60 Komisija nima celovitega pregleda nad napakami pri državni pomoči, države članice so premalo osredotočene na državno pomoč, izterjava državne pomoči po dejavnostih spremljanja Komisije pa ni zadostna 115 Sodišče je v obdobju 2010–2014 pri 269 revidiranih projektih na področju kohezije, za katere se uporabljajo pravila o državni pomoči, odkrilo številne primere neskladnosti s temi pravili.
DG REGIO’s own audits in the area of cohesion have results similar to ours (see paragraphs 33 to 36 and 47 to 48). 
Rezultati revizije GD REGIO na tem področju so podobni rezultatom Sodišča (glej odstavke 33 do 36 ter odstavka 47 in 48).
116 In order to protect the EU budget, the Commission imposes financial corrections on Member States when cases of non‐compliance with State aid rules are detect‐ ed. 
116 Komisija za zaščito proračuna EU državam članicam naloži finančne popravke, če se odkrijejo primeri neskladnosti s pravili o državni pomoči.
For the 2010‐2014 period, DG REGIO has implemented or was in the process of implementing 18 financial corrections against seven Member States that resulted at least partially from infringements of State aid rules. 
Za obdobje 2010– 2014 je GD REGIO naložil oziroma je nameraval naložiti 18 finančnih popravkov sedmim državam članicam, ki so bili vsaj delno posledica kršitev pravil o državni pomoči.