natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The action plan exercise initi‐ ated by the Commission is a step in the right direction in addressing the causes of error 71 Rural development expenditure is implemented by shared management between the Member States and the Commission20. In line with the sub‐ sidiarity principle, Member States are responsible for implementing the rural development programmes at the ap‐ propriate territorial level, according to their own institutional arrangements. 
Izvajanje akcijskih načrtov na pobudo Komisije je korak v pravo smer pri obravnavi vzrokov za napake 71 Odhodke na področju razvoja podeželja deljeno upravljajo države članice in Komisija.20 V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti so države članice odgovorne za izvajanje programov razvoja podeželja na ustrezni teritorialni ravni v skladu s svojimi lastnimi institucionalnimi ureditvami.
The Commission is responsible for supervising Member States to ensure that they fulfil their responsibilities. 
Komisija je odgovorna za nadzor držav članic zaradi zagotavljanja, da izpolnjujejo svoje odgovornosti.
72 If, during implementation, the level of error is persistently high, the Commis‐ sion21 has to identify the weaknesses in the control systems, analyse the costs and benefits of possible correc‐ tive measures and take or propose appropriate action. 
72 Če je med izvajanjem programa stopnja napake nenehno visoka, mora Komisija21 opredeliti slabosti v kontrolnih sistemih, preučiti stroške in koristi morebitnih popravljalnih ukrepov ter ustrezno ukrepati ali predlagati ustrezne ukrepe.
When weaknesses lead to a reservation in the Direc‐ tor‐General’s Declaration of Assurance, the Commission is required to analyse the information in the annual activity report and present an action plan. 
Če slabosti privedejo do pridržka v izjavi generalnega direktorja o zanesljivosti, mora Komisija analizirati informacije v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih in predstaviti akcijski načrt.
This has been the case for rural develop‐ ment expenditure since 2011. 
To se je zgodilo pri odhodkih na področju razvoja podeželja od leta 2011 naprej.
73 In this context, in an effort to reduce the error rate in rural development spending, the Commission invited all Member States to develop a three‐fold action plan in order to identify the causes of error, to implement targeted corrective action aimed at reducing the errors observed and to reinforce the preventive measures to reduce the risk of occurrence of errors. 
73 Zato je Komisija zaradi zmanjšanja stopnje napake pri porabi na področju razvoja podeželja pozvala vse države članice, naj razvijejo tridelni akcijski načrt za ugotovitev vzrokov za napake, izvajanje usmerjenih popravljalnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje ugotovljenih napak in okrepitev preventivnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganja za nastanek napak.
The action plans are not yet a fully developed tool to address the causes of error 74 The scope and quality of the action plans varied significantly from one Member State to another. 
Akcijski načrti še niso v celoti razvito orodje za obravnavo vzrokov za napake 74 Obseg in kakovost akcijskih načrtov sta se med državami članicami bistveno razlikovala.
The Court found that two action plans (Germa‐ ny — Berlin‐Brandenburg and Hun‐ gary) were relatively poor, with few actions and low potential of success in addressing the causes of error, and two (Italy‐Lombardy and Romania) were relatively good, with numerous actions and high potential of success in addressing the causes of error. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da sta dva akcijska načrta (Nemčija – Berlin-Brandenburg in Madžarska) razmeroma slaba, saj imata le nekaj ukrepov in slabe možnosti za uspeh pri obravnavi vzrokov za napake, dva (Italija –Lom-bardija in Romunija) pa razmeroma dobra, saj imata številne ukrepe in dobre možnosti za uspeh pri obravnavi vzrokov za napake.
There are three main weaknesses at the root of this variability in the action plans’ potential effectiveness, as explained in the subsequent paragraphs. 
Kot je pojasnjeno v naslednjih odstavkih, obstajajo tri glavne slabosti, ki so povzročile različne možnosti za uspešnost akcijskih načrtov.
20 Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005. 
1290/2005.
21 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012. 
21 Uredba (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012.
Observations 36 75 Firstly, Member States did not assume their responsibility for the identifica‐ tion of errors and the proposal of corrective actions. 
Opažanja 36 75 Prvič, države članice niso izpolnile svoje odgovornosti za ugotovitev napak in predlaganje popravljalnih ukrepov.
Action plans are subject to a formal monitoring and follow‐up procedure. 
Za akcijske načrte se uporablja formalni postopek spremljanja in nadaljnjega ukrepanja.
When Member States do not implement proposed actions, they may be subject to inter‐ ruption, suspension or reduction of payments and financial corrections. 
Kadar države članice ne izvedejo predlaganih ukrepov, se lahko plačila zanje prekinejo, začasno ustavijo ali znižajo, lahko pa se uporabijo tudi finančni popravki.
Action plans were developed under an iterative process, with a fourth up‐ date being in progress when the audit work was completed. 
Akcijski načrti so bili razviti z iterativnim procesom, pri čemer je bila četrta posodobitev v teku, ko je bilo revizijsko delo končano.
The Commission initially communicated a non‐exhaus‐ tive list of causes of errors. 
Komisija je sprva predložila neizčrpen seznam vzrokov za napake.
However, not all these causes were addressed by Member States and, out of those which were, some have a limited potential to address the causes of error (see Box 11). 
Toda države članice niso obravnavale vseh, med tistimi, ki so bili obravnavani, pa imajo nekateri omejen potencial za obravnavo vzrokov za napake (glej okvir 11).
Subsequently, the action plans were gradually improved in response to the Commission’s requests. 
Akcijski načrti so bili kasneje postopoma izboljšani na zahtevo Komisije.
Example of a proposed action to reduce the error rate The system of reductions and sanctions was one of the potential causes of error in area‐related aid, identified by the Commission and addressed by Member States. 
Primer predlaganega ukrepa za zmanjšanje stopnje napake Sistem znižanj in sankcij je bil eden od mogočih vzrokov za napake na področju pomoči na površino, ki jih je ugotovila Komisija, obravnavale pa države članice.
The system was not considered to be proportionate (in some cases, Member States applied a 100 % reduction in payment even if only one out of several commit‐ ments had been breached). 
Sistem ni štel za sorazmernega (v nekaterih primerih so države članice uporabile 100-odstotno znižanje plačil, čeprav je bila prekršena le ena izmed več zavez).
The Court agrees that adjustments made to the reduction and sanction system should ensure that any such system appropriately reflects the level of non‐fulfilment of the environmental objective pursued. 
Sodišče se strinja, da bi morale prilagoditve sistema znižanj in sankcij zagotoviti, da vsak tak sistem ustrezno odraža stopnjo neizpolnjevanja zastavljenega okoljskega cilja.
However, while a decrease in the sanctions applied will reduce the error rate, this will not address the underly‐ ing infringements and their potentially detrimental impact on the environment. 
Zmanjšanje uporabljenih sankcij bo sicer znižalo stopnjo napake, ne bo pa obravnavalo s tem povezanih kršitev in njihovega potencialno škodljivega vpliva na okolje.
As such, sanctions must act as an effective deterrent to farmers from breaching their obligations. 
Sankcije morajo delovati kot uspešno sredstvo za odvračanje kmetov od kršenja njihovih obveznosti.
This was not accomplished in the case shown in Box 9. 
To ni bilo doseženo v primeru, opisanem v okviru 9.
76 Secondly, four out of the 10 action plans examined did not systematically address the audit findings from the Commission and the Court. 
76 Drugič, štirje od desetih preučenih akcijskih načrtov niso sistematično obravnavali revizijskih ugotovitev Komisije in Sodišča.
Member States did not take into account all the weaknesses reported by Commission auditors by the closure of the conform‐ ity audit procedures, meaning that causes of errors are likely to remain unaddressed for a further period22. 22 The Commission carries out conformity audits in the Member States to check that the expenditure has been paid in compliance with the applicable rules. 
Države članice niso upoštevale vseh slabosti, o katerih so poročali revizorji Komisije ob zaključku postopkov revizije skladnosti, kar pomeni, da vzroki za napake verjetno tudi v naslednjem obdobju ne bodo obravnavani.22 22 Komisija z revizijami skladnosti v državah članicah preverja, ali so bili odhodki izplačani v skladu z veljavnimi pravili.
The audit is closed with or without financial corrections depending on the errors found. 
Revizija je zaključena s finančnimi popravki ali brez njih, odvisno od ugotovljene napake.
The average length of the conformity procedure of the audits closed in 2013 was 36 months. Box 11 
Povprečen postopek ugotavljanja skladnosti pri revizijah, zaključenih v letu 2013, je trajal 36 mesecev. Okvir 11
Observations 37 77 Thirdly, a majority of the actions pro‐ posed were designed along general lines. 
Opažanja 37 77 Tretjič, večina predlaganih ukrepov je bilo zasnovanih v skladu s splošnimi smernicami.
Most Member States propose general solutions such as updating procedure manuals or organising train‐ ing courses. 
Večina držav članic predlaga splošne rešitve, kot je posodabljanje priročnikov za postopke ali organizacija tečajev usposabljanja.
For example, in relation to public procurement, a recurrent solu‐ tion was to train inspectors and ben‐ eficiaries in relation to the applicable public procurement rules. 
Na primer, v zvezi z javnim naročanjem je bila večkrat predlagana rešitev usposabljanje inšpektorjev in upravičencev na področju veljavnih pravil o javnem naročanju.
However, the action plans do not analyse which aspects of the rules were most likely to be breached and why. 
Toda v akcijskih načrtih ni analizirano, za katere vidike pravil je bilo najverjetneje, da bodo kršena, in zakaj.
In this context, there is a risk that the effectiveness of the proposed measures is undermined. 
Zato obstaja tveganje, da je uspešnost predlaganih ukrepov ogrožena.
78 The Court also found examples of best practices in the design of appropriate responses to the problems identi‐ fied (see Box 12). 
78 Sodišče je odkrilo tudi primere najboljše prakse pri zasnovi ustreznih odzivov na ugotovljene probleme (glej okvir 12).
The Commission organises twice‐yearly seminars with representatives from all Member States as an opportunity to discuss the status of implementation of the action plans, to share experience and to disseminate best practices. 
Komisija organizira seminarje s predstavniki iz vseh držav članic, ki potekajo dvakrat letno, kot priložnost za razpravo o napredku pri izvajanju akcijskih načrtov, izmenjavo izkušenj in razširjanje najboljših praks.
Insufficient focus on preventing widespread weaknesses at EU level 79 Action plans address the weaknesses specifically identified in each Member State, without including preventive ac‐ tions for weaknesses detected in other countries. 
Nezadostna osredotočenost na preprečevanje zelo razširjenih slabosti na ravni EU 79 Akcijski načrti obravnavajo specifične slabosti, ugotovljene v vsaki državi članici posebej, ne vključujejo pa preventivnih ukrepov za slabosti, ugotovljene v drugih državah.
The Commission did not request Member States to systemati‐ cally address the most serious wide‐ spread deficiencies encountered at EU level, such as non‐compliance with public procurement rules, intentional irregularities and insufficient admin‐ istrative checks of agri‐environmental commitments. 
Komisija ni zahtevala, da države članice sistematično obravnavajo najresnejše zelo razširjene pomanjkljivosti, ki se pojavljajo na ravni EU, kot so neskladnost s pravili o javnem naročanju, namerne nepravilnosti in nezadostni administrativni pregledi kmetijsko-okoljskih zavez.
Best practices in designing concrete targeted actions In Bulgaria, farmers receive SMS messages from the paying agency, to inform them of time‐bound commit‐ ments (periods when certain practices are prohibited). 
Najboljše prakse pri oblikovanju konkretnih ciljno usmerjenih ukrepov V Bolgariji kmetje od plačilne agencije prejmejo SMS sporočilo z informacijami o zavezah, vezanih na čas (ob-dobja, ko so nekatere prakse prepovedane).
In Italy‐Lombardy, farmers are notified in writing about area differences between the area claimed in the pre‐ vious campaign and the area resulting from the refresh of the land parcel identification system (the IT system identifying the location and area of the agricultural parcels). 
V Italiji – Lombardija so kmetje pisno obveščeni o razliki med površino, za katero je bil vložen zahtevek za prejšnje obdobje, in površino, ugotovljeno s posodobitvijo identifikacijskega sistema za zemljišča (informacijski sistem za identifikacijo lokacije in površine kmetijskih parcel).
In Romania, the paying agency obtained full and free access to the register of commerce which provides the information to verify SME status. Box 12 
V Romuniji je plačilna agencija dobila popoln in prost dostop do poslovnega registra, ki zagotavlja informacije za preverjanje statusa MSP. Okvir 12
Observations 38 80 The Court examined 10 action plans to check whether they include actions to remedy widespread deficiencies. This was not the case. 
Opažanja 38 80 Sodišče je preučilo deset akcijskih načrtov, da bi preverilo, ali vključujejo ukrepe za odpravo zelo razširjenih pomanjkljivosti, in ugotovilo, da jih niso vključevali.
Three Member States did not include any actions in the field of public procurement, five did so in a general manner, while only two (Latvia and Romania) designed detailed checklists. 
Tri države članice niso vključile nobenih ukrepov na področju javnega naročanja, pet jih je to storilo na splošno, samo dve (Latvija in Romunija) pa sta zasnovali podrobne kontrolne sezname.
The Court found that infringements of agri‐environ‐ ment commitments could be detected through administrative checks (see paragraph 63), but only one Member State (Spain) addressed this issue in its action plan, and then only for 7 of the 17 regions. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je kršitve kmetijsko-okoljskih zavez mogoče ugotoviti z administrativnimi pregledi (glej odstavek 63), vendar je samo ena država članica (Španija) to problematiko obravnavala v svojem akcijskem načrtu, in še to le za 7 od 17 regij.
The detection of inten‐ tional irregularities was only included in one action plan (Romania). 
Odkrivanje namernih nepravilnosti je bilo vključeno samo v en akcijski načrt (Romunija).
83 As part of its statutory role, in 2012 the Court issued Opinion No 1/2012 on certain proposals for regulations relat‐ ing to the common agricultural policy for the period 2014–2025. 
83 Sodišče je leta 2012 v okviru svoje zakonske vloge objavilo Mnenje št. 1/2012 o nekaterih predlogih uredb o skupni kmetijski politiki za obdobje 2014–202025.
Whereas Opinion No 1/2012 expressed views on all aspects of the common agricultural policy, mainly from the perspective of sound financial management, this special report addresses only the likely impact of the new legislation on the causes of errors of legality and regular‐ ity in rural development. 
1/2012 izraženo mnenje o vseh vidikih skupne kmetijske politike, zlasti glede dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, to posebno poročilo obravnava le verjetni učinek nove zakonodaje na vzroke za napake v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo na področju razvoja podeželja.
The new legislative package contains factors which may address causes of errors 84 The new legal framework introduces the concept of ex ante conditional‐ ity, meaning a concrete and precisely pre‐defined critical factor, which is a prerequisite for and has a direct and genuine link to, and direct impact on, the effective and efficient achieve‐ ment of a specific objective26. Public procurement is one of the general ex ante conditionalities in the legislation, which stipulates that appropriate ar‐ rangements must be in place for the effective application of EU public pro‐ curement rules, to ensure that contract award procedures are transparent, that the staff involved are trained and that relevant information is disseminated to them. 
Novi zakonodajni sveženj vsebuje dejavnike, ki bi lahko obravnavali vzroke za napake 84 Z novim pravnim okvirom se uvaja koncept predhodne pogojenosti, kar pomeni konkreten in natančno vnaprej opredeljen ključni dejavnik, ki je prvi pogoj za uspešno in učinkovito doseganje posebnega cilja ter je neposredno in resnično povezan z doseganjem tega cilja ter nanj neposredno vpliva.26 Javno naročanje je eden od splošnih primerov predhodne pogojenosti v zakonodaji, ki določa, da je treba vzpostaviti ustrezne ureditve za uspešno izvajanje pravil EU o javnem naročanju, za zagotovitev, da so postopki dodelitve naročil pregledni, da je zadevno osebje usposobljeno in da je prejelo relevantne informacije.
The Court welcomes this focus on compliance with applicable public procurement rules, which were identified as one of the critical sources of error in the 2007–13 programming period. 
Sodišče pozdravlja to osredotočenje na skladnost z veljavnimi pravili o javnem naročanju, ki so bila ugotovljena kot eden ključnih virov napake v programskem obdobju 2007–2013.
23 http://ec.europa.eu/ agriculture/cap‐post‐2013/ legislation/index_en.htm 24 http://ec.europa.eu/ agriculture/cap‐post‐2013/ implementation/ index_en.htm 25 http://www.eca.europa.eu/ Lists/ECADocuments/ OP12_01/OP12_01_EN.PDF 26 Article 2(33) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
23 http://ec.europa.eu/ agriculture/cap-post-2013/ legislation/index_en.htm 24 http://ec.europa.eu/ agriculture/cap-post-2013/ implementation/ index_en.htm 25 http://www.eca.europa.eu/ Lists/ECADocuments/ OP12_01/OP12_01_SL.PDF 26 Člen 2(33) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo, o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
Observations 39 85 Although it was already covered in the general principles of control for the 2007–13 programming period, the verifiability and controllability of measures27 is highlighted in the new legislation. 
Opažanja 39 85 Preverljivost in možnost kontrole ukre-pov27 sta bili v novi zakonodaji poudar-jeni, čeprav sta bili zajeti že v splošnih kontrolnih načelih za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
Under the new rules, Mem‐ ber States must ensure that all rural development measures are verifiable and controllable, both ex ante, before they are actually implemented, and subsequently, during implementation. 
V skladu z novimi pravili morajo države članice zagotoviti, da je vse ukrepe za razvoj podeželja mogoče preverjati in kontrolirati tako predhodno, preden se izvajajo, kot tudi kasneje, med izvajanjem.
The Court considers that this approach is likely to help reduce the error rate in two ways; on the one hand, by mak‐ ing it possible to define eligibility criteria and other commitments more precisely so that they can be better un‐ derstood and complied with by benefi‐ ciaries, and on the other hand, it will allow control procedures to be better designed to ensure that such criteria can be verified effectively. 
Sodišče meni, da je za ta pristop verjetno, da bo pripomogel k zmanjšanju stopnje napake na dva načina: po eni strani bo omogočil natančnejše opredeljevanje meril za upravičenost in drugih zavez, da jih bodo lahko upravičenci bolje razumeli in upoštevali, po drugi strani boljšo zasnovo kontrolnih postopkov za zagotavljanje, da je mogoče ta merila uspešno preverjati.
86 The methods for establishing and reimbursing costs incurred by benefi‐ ciaries are also improved in the new legislation. 
86 V novi zakonodaji so izboljšane tudi metode za določitev in povračilo stroškov, ki so jih imeli upravičenci.
Thus, in addition to the usual method of reimbursement based on the eligible costs actually incurred and paid by beneficiaries, the new legal framework places alternative methods such as standard costs, lump sum payments and flat rate financing on an equal footing with reimburse‐ ment. 
Tako so v novem pravnem okviru alternativne metode, kot so standardni stroški, pavšalna plačila in pavšalno financiranje, enakovredni običajni metodi povračila, ki temelji na dejansko nastalih upravičenih stroških, ki so jih imeli in plačali upravičenci.
The Court considers that the use of these simplified cost methods is likely to be beneficial for all parties, because it may reduce the adminis‐ trative formalities and may limit the scope of errors related to preparing and verifying payment claims based on invoices and payment documents. 
Sodišče meni, da je za uporabo teh metod poenostavljenega obračunavanja stroškov verjetno, da bo koristna za vse deležnike, ker lahko zmanjša upravne formalnosti in omeji obseg napak, povezanih s pripravo in preverjanjem zahtevkov za plačila na podlagi računov in dokazil o plačilu.
87 Accredited paying agencies will have to comply with additional criteria with regard to fraud. 
87 Akreditirane plačilne agencije bodo morale izpolnjevati dodatna merila za preprečevanje goljufij.
While the requirement that checks should include those ele‐ ments to prevent and detect fraud has been carried forward, two new provi‐ sions underline the role of the paying agencies in this respect: staff training should include fraud awareness and monitoring activities should include also the procedures to prevent and detect fraud. 
Zahteva, naj pregledi vključujejo te elemente za preprečevanje in odkrivanje goljufij, se je sicer ohranila, dve novi določbi pa poudarjata vlogo plačilne agencije v zvezi s tem: usposabljanje osebja bi moralo vključevati ozaveščanje o goljufijah, dejavnosti spremljanja pa bi morale vključevati tudi postopke za njihovo preprečevanje in odkrivanje.
88 The ‘n+2 rule’ as it existed in the 2007–13 programming period (see paragraph 18) has been relaxed and transformed into a ‘n+3 rule’28, giving Member States an additional year to spend the allocated budget. 
88 „Pravilo n + 2”, ki je obstajalo v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 (glej odstavek 18), je bilo spremenjeno v „pravilo n + 3”28, ki državam članicam daje na voljo dodatno leto za porabo dodeljenih proračunskih sredstev.
This could reduce the imbalance between the pressure on Member States to spend the budget, and the need to ensure that it is spent correctly and in ac‐ cordance with the principles of sound financial management. 
S tem bi lahko zmanjšali neravnovesje med pritiskom na države članice, naj proračunska sredstva porabijo, in potrebo po zagotovitvi, da so sredstva porabljena pravilno in v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja.
89 As a general rule, the beneficiaries of investment in food processing activi‐ ties had to be small and medium‐sized enterprises (see paragraph 43). 
89 Splošno pravilo je bilo, da morajo biti upravičenci, ki izvajajo naložbe v živilskopredelovalne dejavnosti, mala in srednja podjetja (glej odstavek 43).
The new legal framework removes this eli‐ gibility criterion, which was one of the main causes of error for this type of in‐ vestment. 
V novem pravnem okviru je to merilo za upravičenost, ki je bilo eden od glavnih vzrokov za napake pri tovrstnih naložbah, odpravljeno.