natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In relation to Campania, the Commission assured itself, on the basis of data on outputs and results already achieved at the time of the modification request, that the targets initially set remained valid despite the reduction of the financial allocation. 
V zvezi s Kampanijo se je Komisija na podlagi podatkov o izložkih in rezultatih, že doseženih v času zahtevka za spremembo, prepričala, da so prvotno zastavljeni cilji kljub zmanjšanju dodeljenih finančnih sredstev ostali veljavni.
Furthermore, the Commission would like to underline that it encourages Member States to be as ambitious as possible in terms of results planned and cost/participant ratio. 
Poleg tega želi Komisija poudariti, da države članice poziva, da so pri načrtovanih rezultatih in razmerju med stroški in udeleženci čim bolj ambiciozne.
If the Member States consider they can achieve the same level of results at a lower cost, the Commission will not question this. 
Če države članice menijo, da lahko enake rezultate dosežejo z nižjimi stroški, Komisija v to ne bo dvomila.
On the contrary, a substantial increase of the financial allocation without a change in the target for participants reached would have prompted a further analysis by the Commission during the OP modification procedure. 
Nasprotno pa bi znatno povečanje dodeljenih finančnih sredstev brez spremembe doseženega cilja za udeležence v postopku spremembe operativnega programa sprožilo nadaljnjo analizo Komisije.
Reply of the Commission 57 44 See Commission reply to paragraph 42. 48 The Commission notes that the 2007-2013 regulatory framework contained no obligation to set targets and output/ result indicators at project level. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 42. 48. Komisija ugotavlja, da regulativni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 ni vseboval nobenih obveznosti določanja ciljev in kazalnikov izložkov/rezultatov na ravni projekta.
The ESF expert evaluation network and the ex-post evaluation have shown the need to improve the monitoring arrangements so that comprehensive, reliable and comparable result indicators are available at project level, especially after the completion of the intervention, to allow for an assessment of the performance and sustainability of results. 
Strokovna mreža ESS za vrednotenje in naknadno vrednotenje kažeta, da je treba izboljšati načine spremljanja, da bodo zlasti po končani intervenciji na voljo izčrpni, zanesljivi in primerljivi kazalniki rezultatov na ravni projektov, ki omogočajo oceno uspešnosti in trajnosti rezultatov.
This lesson is already reflected in the 2014-2020 framework. 
To spoznanje se že odraža v okviru za obdobje 2014–2020.
Each operation supporting participants has to collect data on individual participants based on common indicators for participants and relevant specific indicators, and performance data should be recorded and stored by operation in a computerised form in order to allow them to be aggregated where necessary for the purpose of monitoring, evaluation, financial management, verification and audit (Article 24.2 of Commission Delegated Regulation 480/2014). 
Vsaka operacija, ki podpira udeležence, mora zbrati podatke o posameznih udeležencih na podlagi skupnih kazalnikov za udeležence in ustreznih posebnih kazalnikov, podatke o uspešnosti pa je treba za vsako operacijo zabeležiti in jih shraniti v računalniški obliki, da se omogoči njihova agregacija, kadar je to potrebno za namene spremljanja, ocenjevanja, finančnega upravljanja, preverjanja in revizije (člen 24(2) delegirane Uredbe Komisije 480/2014).
Targets have to be linked to the output and result indicators stored where relevant. 
Cilji morajo biti povezani s shranjenimi kazalniki izložkov in rezultatov, kjer je to ustrezno.
51 See Commission reply to paragraph 48. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 48.
61 The Commission acknowledges a limited number of inconsistencies in the text of the 2014-2020 OPs regarding criteria and actions on ex-ante conditionalities. 
Komisija priznava omejeno število nedoslednosti glede meril in ukrepov za predhodne pogojenosti v besedilu o operativnih programih za obdobje 2014–2020.
The Commission and the Member States have been working to identify any such inconsistencies and to address them in compliance with Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
Komisija in države članice si prizadevajo za opredelitev takih nedoslednosti in za njihovo obravnavo v skladu s členom 30 Uredbe (EU) št.
65 See Commission reply to paragraph 68. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 68.
67 The selection criteria are indeed drawn up and applied by the Managing Authority. 
67. Izbirna merila dejansko pripravijo in uporabljajo organi upravljanja.
These criteria need to ensure that the operations selected contribute to the achievement of the specific objectives and results of the relevant priority (Article 125(3)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013). 
Ta merila morajo zagotoviti, da izbrane operacije prispevajo k doseganju posebnih ciljev in rezultatov zadevnih prednostnih nalog (člen 125(3)(a)(i) Uredbe (EU) št.
These criteria need to be approved by the Monitoring Committee (Article 110(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013) in which the Commission participates in an advisory capacity. 
1303/2013). Ta merila mora odobriti odbor za spremljanje (člen 110(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št.
The Commission has drawn Member States’ attention to the importance of the selection criteria for achieving the specific objectives (in particular to deliver on relevant country-specific recommendations) in its discussions in the ESF Technical Working Group. 
Komisija je države članice v svojih razpravah v tehnični delovni skupini ESS opozorila na pomembnost izbirnih meril za doseganje posebnih ciljev (zlasti za izpolnitev ustreznih priporočil za posamezne države).
Reply of the Commission 58 68 The Commission notes that in case the Member State was not able to set a quantified target for a result indicator due to the lack of reliable baselines, general ex-ante conditionality on statistical systems and result indicators has been considered as unfulfilled and an action plan was set up to remedy the shortcoming. 
68. Komisija opozarja, da se splošna predhodna pogojenost, povezana s statističnimi sistemi in kazalniki rezultatov, šteje za neizpolnjeno, če država članica zaradi pomanjkanja zanesljivih izhodišč ni mogla določiti količinsko opredeljenih ciljev za kazalnik rezultatov, zato je bil vzpostavljen akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti.
73 The Commission notes that result indicators are to be designed in line with the intervention logic of the programme so as to reflect the specific objectives pursued. 
Komisija opozarja, da morajo biti kazalniki rezultatov zasnovani v skladu z intervencijsko logiko programa, da odražajo zastavljene posebne cilje.
The latter reflect the specific challenges, in particular the country specific recommendations of the Member State in line with thematic concentration and increased contribution of the ESF support to the Europe 2020 strategy. 
Slednje odraža posebne izzive, zlasti priporočila za posamezne države v državi članici v skladu s tematsko osredotočenostjo in večjim prispevkom podpore iz ESS strategiji Evropa 2020.
The ensuing diversity of specific objectives that can contribute to a specific investment priority makes it difficult to standardize suitable indicators for target-setting in advance. 
Posledična raznolikost posebnih ciljev, ki lahko prispevajo k posebni prioriteti za vlaganje, otežuje poenotenje primernih kazalnikov za vnaprejšnje določanje ciljev.
At the same time, although not always linked to quantified targets, all common output and result indicators will be monitored and reported for all investment priorities, allowing to calculate success ratios. 
Hkrati se bodo vsi skupni kazalniki izložkov in rezultatov, čeprav niso vedno povezani s količinsko opredeljenimi cilji, spremljali in sporočali za vse prioritete za vlaganja, kar bo omogočilo izračun stopenj uspeha.
Box 4 - Example where targets for additional outcome indicator would have been helpful The Commission notes that: — the description of the specific objective also includes the promotion of activation and employability of young people; — the indicator is coherent with the recipients targeted in the specific objective, which include students and families but also inactive and unemployed young people and corresponds to some of the activities foreseen (train-eeships, guidance and school-work experiences); — the focus on the employment effects of interventions is also coherent with the fact that the OP will intervene in co-ordination with (and not duplicating) the interventions of the National OP ‘Per la Scuola’, which focuses on the education side of early school leaving. 
Okvir 4 – Primer, kjer bi bili koristni cilji za dodatni kazalnik rezultatov Komisija meni naslednje: • opis posebnega cilja vključuje tudi spodbujanje aktivacije in zaposljivosti mladih; • kazalnik je skladen s prejemniki, na katere je usmerjen posebni cilj ter vključujejo študente in družine, pa tudi neaktivne in brezposelne mlade, ter ustreza nekaterim predvidenim dejavnostim (pripravništva, usmerjanje in delovne prakse); • osredotočenost na zaposlitvene učinke intervencij je skladna tudi z dejstvom, da bo operativni program posegel v sodelovanje z intervencijami (ne bo jih podvajal) nacionalnega operativnega programa „per la Scuola“, ki se osredotoča na izobraževalno plat zgodnjega opuščanja šolanja. 80.
80 As regards the measurement of effects on employment, the common immediate and longer-term result indicators will be collected and reported for all investment priorities. 
V zvezi z merjenjem učinkov na zaposlovanje se bodo za vse prioritete za vlaganja zbirali in sporočali skupni kazalniki takojšnjih in dolgotrajnejših rezultatov.
As regards target setting to pre-defined result indicators, see Commission reply to paragraph 73. 
Glede zastavljanja ciljev za vnaprej določene kazalnike rezultatov glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 73.
Reply of the Commission 59 82 The Commission notes that the 2007-2013 regulatory framework contained no obligation to set targets and output/ result indicators at project level. 
Komisija navaja, da regulativni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 ni vseboval nobenih obveznosti določanja ciljev in kazalnikov izložkov/rezultatov na ravni projekta.
83 The Commission notes that according to Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 an OP needs to include an analysis of the situation of the eligible area or sector in terms of strengths and weaknesses and the strategy chosen; a justification of the priorities chosen as well as information on the priority axes and their specific targets. 
Komisija navaja, da mora operativni program v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 vsebovati analizo stanja upravičenega področja ali sektorja glede prednosti in slabosti ter izbrane strategije; utemeljitev izbranih prednostnih nalog ter podatke o prednostnih oseh in njihovih posebnih ciljih.
However, when a Member State has a Country Specific Recommendation on education, the needs analysis can be fairly limited. 
Vendar so lahko analize potreb precej omejene, če ima država članica na področju izobraževanja priporočilo za posamezno državo.
Monitoring and evaluation of performance at Operational Programme level was possible. 
Spremljanje in ocenjevanje uspešnosti na ravni operativnega programa je bilo mogoče.
While in the absence of a legal requirement to set common result indicators, aggregation at EU level has been a challenge, the work of the ESF Expert Evaluation Network bringing together Member States' monitoring and evaluation evidence have helped to partially overcome the obstacles. 
Čeprav je v odsotnosti pravne zahteve po določitvi skupnih kazalnikov rezultatov združevanje podatkov na ravni EU izziv, je delo Strokovne mreže ESS za vrednotenje, ki združuje dokaze, ki so jih države članice odkrile pri spremljanju in vrednotenju, pomagalo delno premagati ovire.
84 The Commission notes that an increase or a decrease in the financial allocation does not imply automatically the need to change the target value. 
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da povečanje ali zmanjšanje dodeljenih finančnih sredstev ne pomeni samodejno, da je treba spremeniti ciljno vrednost.
Once implementation has started and the economic context changes, Member States can realize that more or different and more costly actions need to be taken to achieve the initial target and this might require additional funding. 
Ko se izvajanje že začne in se gospodarske razmere spremenijo, lahko države članice ugotovijo, da je za dosego prvotnega cilja potrebnih več ukrepov ali pa, da morajo ti biti drugačni in da so dražji, kar lahko zahteva dodatna sredstva.
86 The Commission notes that the 2007-2013 regulatory framework contained no obligation to set targets and output/ result indicators at project level. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da regulativni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 ni vseboval nobenih obveznosti določanja ciljev in kazalnikov izložkov/rezultatov na ravni projekta.
87 The Commission acknowledges a limited number of inconsistencies in the text of the 2014-2020 OPs regarding criteria and actions on ex-ante conditionalities. 
Komisija priznava omejeno število nedoslednosti glede meril in ukrepov za predhodne pogojenosti v besedilu o operativnih programih za obdobje 2014–2020.
Reply of the Commission 60 89 The selection criteria are indeed drawn up and applied by the Managing Authority. 
1303/2013. 89. Izbirna merila dejansko pripravijo in uporabljajo organi upravljanja.
These criteria need to be approved by the Monitoring Committee (Article 110(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013) in which the Commission participates in an advisory capacity. 
1303/2013). Ta merila mora odobriti odbor za spremljanje (člen 110(2)(a) Uredba (EU) št.
90 The Commission notes that result indicators are to be designed in line with the intervention logic of the programme so as to reflect the specific objectives pursued. 
Komisija opozarja, da morajo biti kazalniki rezultatov zasnovani v skladu z intervencijsko logiko programa, da odražajo zastavljene posebne cilje.
Recommendation 1 The Commission accepts the recommendation and will consider for the post-2020 programme period specifying the result indicator(s) for which baseline and target values should be set for each investment priority. 
Priporočilo 1 Komisija sprejema priporočilo in bo za programsko obdobje po letu 2020 preučila določanje kazalnikov rezultatov, za katere bi morale biti določene izhodiščne in ciljne vrednosti za vsako prioriteto za vlaganje.
Recommendation 2 First indent The Commission accepts the recommendation and will implement it when considering Member States' requests for OP modifications. 
Priporočilo 2 Prva alinea: Komisija sprejema priporočilo in ga bo izvedla pri obravnavi zahtevkov držav članic za spremembe operativnih programov.
Recommendation 2 Second indent The Commission accepts this recommendation and is already implementing it in line with the applicable legal framework. 
Druga alinea: Komisija sprejema priporočilo in ga že izvaja v skladu z veljavnim pravnim okvirom.
Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 requires that requests for amendment of programmes submitted by a Member State are duly justified and in particular set out the expected impact of the changes to the programme on achieving the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and the specific objectives defined in the programme, taking account of this Regulation and the Fund-specific rules, the horizontal principles referred to in Articles 5, 7 and 8, as well as of the Partnership Agreement. 
Člen 30 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 določa, da morajo biti zahtevki za spremembo programov, ki jih predloži država članica, ustrezno utemeljeni in zlasti, da je v njih naveden predvideni vpliv sprememb programa na doseganje ciljev iz strategije Unije za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast ter posebnih ciljev iz programa, ob upoštevanju te uredbe in pravil za posamezne sklade, horizontalnih načel iz členov 5, 7 in 8 ter partnerskega sporazuma.
Reply of the Commission 61 Recommendation 3 The Commission notes that this recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Komisija ugotavlja, da je to priporočilo naslovljeno na države članice.
Recommendation 4 The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 4 Komisija sprejema priporočilo.
Article 23 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 moreover allows the Commission to request a Member State to review and propose amendments to its Partnership Agreement and relevant programmes to support the implementation of relevant country-specific recommendations. The Commission therefore already has the possibility to request, where relevant - i.e. when new Country Specific Recommendations identify weak links between education and employment - that funding is allocated to reinforcing the link between education and employment. 
1303/2013 Komisiji omogoča, da od države članice zahteva, da pregleda in predlaga spremembe svojega partnerskega sporazuma in ustreznih programov, kadar je to potrebno za podporo izvajanju ustreznih priporočil za posamezne države, Komisija ima zato že zdaj možnost zahtevati, kadar je to ustrezno, tj. ko nova priporočila za posamezne države opredelijo šibke povezave med izobraževanjem in zaposlitvijo, da se sredstva namenijo krepitvi povezave med izobraževanjem in zaposlitvijo.
The Commission will make sure that these results are made visible through the summary of the annual implementation reports. 
Komisija bo zagotovila, da bodo ti rezultati vidni v povzetku letnih poročil o izvajanju. 6
EN 2016 Special Report NO 24 More efforts needed to raise awareness of and enforce compliance with State aid rules in cohesion policy EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
24 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Potrebnih je več prizadevanj za seznanjanje s pravili o državni pomoči in uveljavljanje njihovega spoštovanja EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel.: +352 4398-1 Vprašanja: eca.europa.eu/sl/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Spletišče: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA Veliko dodatnih informacij o Evropski uniji je na voljo na internetu.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-5893-9 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-5879-3 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-5887-8 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/42539 doi:10.2865/67955 doi:10.2865/911996 QJ-AB-16-024-EN-C QJ-AB-16-024-EN-N QJ-AB-16-024-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-5886-1 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-5840-3 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-5842-7 ISSN 1831-094X ISSN 1977-5784 ISSN 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/483763 doi:10.2865/30535 doi:10.2865/181932 QJ-AB-16-024-SL-C QJ-AB-16-024-SL-N QJ-AB-16-024-SL-E © Evropska unija, 2016 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira. št.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 24 More efforts needed to raise awareness of and enforce compliance with State aid rules in cohesion policy (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
24 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Potrebnih je več prizadevanj za seznanjanje s pravili o državni pomoči in uveljavljanje njihovega spoštovanja (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
This performance audit was produced by Audit Chamber II — headed by ECA Member Henri Grethen — which spe‐ cialises in investment for cohesion, growth and inclusion spending areas. 
To revizijo smotrnosti poslovanja je opravil senat II, ki ga vodi Henri Grethen, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, in ki je specializiran za naložbe v kohezijo, rast in vključevanje.
The audit was led by the Reporting Mem‐ ber Oskar Herics, supported by Margit Spindelegger, Head of private office; Niels Brokopp, Principal Manager; Gert Rammeloo and Angelika Zych, Heads of Task; Ildiko Preiss, Attaché; Dana Moraru, Maria Ploumaki and Laura Zanarini, Auditors. 
Revizijo je vodil član poročevalec Oskar Herics, pomagali pa so mu Margit Spindelegger, vodja kabineta, Niels Brokopp, vodilni upravni uslužbenec, Gert Rammeloo in Angelika Zych, vodji naloge, Ildiko Preiss, ataše, ter Dana Moraru, Maria Ploumaki in Laura Zanarini, revizorke.
From left to right: A. Zych, I. Preiss, G. Rammeloo, N. Brokopp, M. Spindelegger, O. Herics. 
Od leve proti desni: A. Zych, I. Preiss, G. Rammeloo, N. Brokopp, M. Spindelegger, O. Herics.
Contents 03 Paragraph Abbreviations Glossary I-VIII Executive summary 1-24 Introduction 3-8 What is State aid and what is its financial importance in the EU? 
Kazalo 03 Odstavek Kratice Glosar I-VIII Povzetek 1-24 Uvod 3-8 Kaj je državna pomoč in kako finančno pomembna je v EU?
9-21 Procedures for granting State aid 9-10 Member States must notify State aid to the Commission 11-14 Exemptions to notification 15-21 Main actors involved in managing operational programmes in cohesion policy 22-24 Audits of the European Court of Auditors and Member States’ supreme audit institutions on State aid 25-31 Audit scope and approach 32-113 Observations 32-82 Lack of comprehensive analysis by the Commission of State aid errors and insufficient Member State focus on State aid 33-44 Significant number of State aid errors in the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund and, to a much lesser extent, in the European Social Fund 45-71 Commission’s monitoring weakened by a lack of a comprehensive analysis and insufficient internal coordination 72-82 Insufficient focus of Member States’ audit authorities on compliance with State aid rules 
9-21 Postopki za dodelitev državne pomoči 9-10 Države članice morajo državno pomoč priglasiti Komisiji 11-14 Izjeme pri priglasitvi 15-21 Glavni akterji, ki sodelujejo pri upravljanju operativnih programov kohezijske politike 22-24 Revizije Evropskega računskega sodišča in vrhovnih revizijskih institucij držav članic na področju državne pomoči 25-31 Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 32-113 Opažanja 32-82 Komisija ni dovolj izčrpno analizirala napak pri državni pomoči, države članice pa niso dovolj osredotočene na državno pomoč 33-44 Veliko število napak pri državni pomoči v okviru Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj, Kohezijskega sklada in, v precej manjšem obsegu, Evropskega socialnega sklada 45-71 Spremljanje, ki ga izvaja Komisija, je oslabljeno, ker ni dovolj izčrpne analize in ker je interno usklajevanje nezadostno 72-82 Premajhno osredotočanje revizijskih organov držav članic na skladnost s pravili o državni pomoči