natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Erasmus+ combines the programmes from the period 2007-2013 under one Programme. 
Erasmus+ združuje programe s teh področij za obdobje 2007–2913 v okviru enega programa.
The activities and projects that it funds are distributed between Key Actions (KA), as shown in Figure 1. 
Financirane dejavnosti in projekti so porazdeljeni med ključne ukrepe, kot je prikazano na sliki 1.
11 1 2 3 Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing “Erasmus+”: the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport and repealing Decisions No 1719/2006/EC, No 1720/2006/EC and No 1298/2008/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
Člen 4 Uredbe (EU) št. 1288/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2013 o uvedbi programa „Erasmus+“, program Unije za izobraževanje, usposabljanje, mladino in šport, ter o razveljavitvi sklepov št.
COM(2010) 2020 final of 3 March 2010 “EUROPE 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth”. 
COM(2010) 2020 final z dne 3. marca 2010, EVROPA 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast.
Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (‘ET 2020’) - 2009/C 119/02. 
Sklepi Sveta z dne 12. maja 2009 o strateškem okviru za evropsko sodelovanje v izobraževanju in usposabljanju („ET 2020“) (2009/C 119/02).
Figure 1 - Structure of the Erasmus+ Programme 2014-2020 Previous Programmes 2007-2013 One integrated Programme 2014-2020 Source: ECA. Lifelong Learning Programme: Grundtvig, Erasmus, Leonardo, Comenius International Higher Education programmes: Erasmus Mundus, Tempus, Alfa, Edulink, bilateral programmes Erasmus+ Key Action 2 Youth in Action 12 Key Action 1 Key Action 3 Support for policy reform 4. 
Slika 1 – Struktura programa Erasmus+ za obdobje 2014–2020 Prejšnji programi 2007–2013 En združen program 2014–2020 Program vseživljenjskega učenja: Grundtvig, Erasmus, Leonardo, Comenius Mednarodni visokošolski programi: Erasmus Mundus, Tempus, Alfa, Edul i nk, dvostranski programi Erasmus+ Mladi v akciji 12 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče Ključni ukrep 1 Učna mobilnost Ključni ukrep 2 Sodelovanje na področju inovacij in izmenjava dobrih praks Ključni ukrep 3 Podpora za reformo politik Posebni ukrepi: Jean Monnet, Šport 4.
The European Commission (Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture) is ultimately responsible for the implementation of Erasmus+. It manages the budget and sets priorities, targets and criteria. 
Za izvajanje programa Erasmus+ je v končni fazi odgovorna Evropska komisija (Generalni direktorat za izobraževanje, mladino, šport in kulturo), ki upravlja proračun in določa prioritete, ožje cilje in merila.
It guides and monitors the implementation, follow-up and evaluation of the Programme at European level. 
Usmerja in spremlja izvajanje ter izvaja nadaljnje spremljanje in vrednotenje programa na evropski ravni.
The European Commission also has responsibility for the supervision and coordination of the structures in charge of implementing the Programme at national level. 
Odgovorna je tudi za nadzor in usklajevanje subjektov, pristojnih za izvajanje programa na nacionalni ravni.
The implementation of the Erasmus+ Programme is largely (80 %) based on indirect management (see Figure 2). 
Izvajanje programa Erasmus+ v glavnem (80 %) temelji na posrednem upravljanju (glej sliko2).
The NA are designated by national authority(ies), who also appoint an independent audit body in accordance with the Financial Regulation. 
Imenujejo jih nacionalni organi, ki v skladu s finančno uredbo imenujejo tudi neodvisen revizijski organ.
Cooperation for innovation and exchange of good practices Learning mobility Specific Actions: Jean Monnet, Sport Figure 2 - Erasmus+ management COMMISSION (indirect management) delegates NATIONAL AGENCY selects beneficiaries (through call for proposals) 13 HE Participants (staff and students) ADULT Participants (staff and students) SE Participants (staff) Source: ECA. 
Slika 2 – Upravljanje programa Erasmus+ 13 KOMISIJA (posredno upravljanje) prenos pooblastil NACIONALNA AGENCIJA izbira upravičencev (na podlagi razpisa za zbiranje predlogov) VISOKO ŠOLSTVO udeleženci (zaposleni in študentje) IZOBRAŽEVANJE ODRASLIH udeleženci (zaposleni in udeleženci izobraževanja odraslih) Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče POKLICNO IZOBRAŽEVANJE IN USPOSABLJANJE udeleženci (zaposleni in dijaki/vajenci) ŠOLSKO IZOBRAŽEVANJE udeleženci (zaposleni) 6.
The most significant part of the Programme in terms of the EU Budget is KA1. 
Glede na proračun EU je najpomembnejši del programa ključni ukrep 1.
It is made up of mobility projects for learners and staff in higher education, vocational education and training and adult education as well as for staff in school education and for young people. 
Zajema projekte mobilnosti udeležencev izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter zaposlenih v visokem šolstvu, poklicnem izobraževanju in usposabljanju ter izobraževanju odraslih, zaposlenih v šolah in mladih.
In addition KA1 provides for Erasmus Mundus Joint Master’s degrees and Erasmus+ Master’s loans. 
Poleg tega vključuje financiranje skupnih magisterijev Erasmus Mundus in posojil za študente na magistrskem študiju Erasmus+.
Learning mobility provided under KA1 (moving physically to a country other than the country of residence, in order to undertake study, training or informal or non-formal learning, see Annex I for examples) is intended to improve the level of key competences and skills, with particular regard to their relevance for the labour market and their contribution to a cohesive society. 
Učna mobilnost v okviru ključnega ukrepa 1 (dejanska preselitev v državo, ki ni država stalnega prebivališča, zaradi študija, usposabljanja ali priložnostnega ali neformalnega učenja; za primere glej Prilogo I) je namenjena izboljšanju ključnih kompetenc in spretnosti, pri čemer se posebna pozornost posveča njihovi relevantnosti za trg dela in njihovemu prispevku h kohezivni družbi.
Moreover, Mobility is an important means to promote the inclusion of people from disadvantaged backgrounds. 
Še več, mobilnost je pomembno sredstvo za spodbujanje vključevanja ljudi iz neugodnih razmer.
Figure 3 shows the budget distribution between the different parts of the Programme. 
Na sliki 3 je prikazana porazdelitev proračuna med različnimi deli programa.
Figure 3 - Budget allocation 2014-2020 Education-KA3 3.3% Education-KA2 21.7% Margin–Education and Training 3.7% Education-KA1 48.8% Student loan facility 3.5% Source: ECA. 
Slika 3 – Proračunske dodelitve za obdobje 2014–2020 Izobraževanje – ključni ukrep 3 3,3% Izobraževanje – ključni ukrep 2 21,7 % Rezerva – izobraževanje in usposabljanje 3,7 % Izobraževanje – ključni ukrep 1 48,8 % Jamstvena shema za študentska posojila 3,5% Mladi 10,0 % Nacionalne agencije 3,4% Jean Monnet 1,9 % Upravni stroški 1,9% Šport 1,8% 14 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče 9.
Youth 10.0% National agencies 3.4% Jean Monnet 1.9% Administrative costs 1.9% Sport 1.8% 9. (a) (b) Countries participating in Erasmus+ are divided into two groups as shown in Figure 4: Programme countries: EU Member States plus the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey; and 145 partner countries (neighbouring countries and the rest of the world). 
Države, ki sodelujejo v programu Erasmus+, so razdeljene na dve skupini, kot je prikazano na sliki 4: (a) države programa: države članice EU, nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija, Islandija, Lihtenštajn, Norveška in Turčija; (b) 145 partnerskih držav (sosednje države in ostali del sveta).
Figure 4 – Erasmus+ is a global programme PROGRAMME COUNTRIES Member States of the EU Non EU Programme Countries PARTNER COUNTRIES Neighbouring countries Any other in the world Source: ECA. AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH 10. 
Slika 4 - Erasmus+ je globalni program DRŽAVE PROGRAMA Države članice EU Države programa, ki niso članice EU PARTNERSKE DRŽAVE Sosednje države Druge države po svetu Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP 10.
We assessed the performance and European Added Value (EAV) of the Erasmus+ Programme. 
Evropsko računsko sodišče je ocenilo smotrnost in evropsko dodano vrednost programa Erasmus+.
We focused the audit on KA1 (Mobility) for Education and Training, which makes up more than half of the Programme’s budget allocation. 
Osredotočilo se je na revidiranje ključnega ukrepa 1 (mobilnost) za izobraževanje in usposabljanje, za katerega je namenjenih več kot polovica proračunskih dodelitev.
Projects under KA2 and KA3 have an implementation period of several years and were mostly at the implementing and/or contracting stage in 2017. 
Projekti v okviru ključnih ukrepov 2 in 3 se izvajajo po več let in so bili leta 2017 večinoma v fazi izvajanja in/ali sklepanja pogodb.
In particular, we examined whether: (a) Erasmus+ Mobility provides the expected EAV; (b) the results of Erasmus+ Mobility are appropriately measured; and (c) innovations introduced under Erasmus+ Mobility have improved the Programme. 
Sodišče je preučilo zlasti, ali: (a) ukrep mobilnosti v okviru programa Erasmus+ prinaša pričakovano evropsko dodano vrednost, (b) se rezultati ukrepa mobilnosti v okviru programa Erasmus+ ustrezno merijo, (c) se je program izboljšal zaradi inovacij, uvedenih z ukrepom mobilnosti v okviru programa Erasmus+.
We selected five Programme countries to visit: Estonia, Norway, Poland, Romania and Spain. 
Sodišče je za obisk izbralo pet držav programa: Estonijo, Norveško, Poljsko, Romunijo in Španijo.
Our criteria for the selection of the countries were: (i) the number of participants they 15 receive and send; (ii) a country receiving and sending a relatively low number of participants; (iii) a geographical spread across EU Member States and (iv) one non-EU country. 
Za izbiro držav je uporabilo naslednja merila: (i) število udeležencev, ki jih je neka država sprejela in poslala; (ii) država, ki je sprejela in poslala razmeroma majhno število udeležencev; (iii) geografska porazdelitev po državah članicah EU; (iv) ena država, ki ni članica EU.
We obtained evidence from: (a) interviews with Erasmus+ stakeholders, including: (i) Commission and European Investment Fund (EIF) staff responsible for the management of Erasmus+; (ii) the National Agencies, national authorities, beneficiaries and participants from the five selected programme countries; (b) a review of documentation and procedures relating to Erasmus+; (c) an analysis of data, including the mid-term evaluation (MTE) of Erasmus+ 2014-20164. This was published on 31 January 2018, after the end of our audit period. 
Dokazila je dobilo: (a) z razgovori z deležniki programa Erasmus+, vključno: (i) z zaposlenimi na Komisiji in Evropskem investicijskem skladu, ki so odgovorni za upravljanje programa, (ii) z zaposlenimi na nacionalnih agencijah in nacionalnih organih ter upravičenci in udeleženci v petih izbranih državah programa; (b) s pregledom dokumentacije in postopkov v zvezi s programom Erasmus+; (c) z analizo podatkov, vključno s tistimi iz vmesne ocene programa Erasmus+ za obdobje 2014–20164, ki je bila objavljena 31. januarja 2018 po koncu obdobja revizije Sodišča.
We reviewed this key document and found that much of it corroborated our findings. 
Sodišče je pregledalo ta ključni dokument in ugotovilo, da ta v veliki meri potrjuje njegove ugotovitve.
We refer to the MTE and its findings where appropriate. 
Kadar je ustrezno, se Sodišče sklicuje na vmesno oceno in njene ugotovitve.
OBSERVATIONS Erasmus+ mobility creates more forms of European Added Value than that required in the Regulation Erasmus+ Mobility provides the European Added Value as required by the Regulation 14. 
OPAŽANJA S programom Erasmus+ se ustvarja več vrst evropske dodane vrednosti, kot je zahtevano v Uredbi Mobilnost v okviru programa Erasmus+ prinaša evropsko dodano vrednost, kot je zahtevano v Uredbi 14.
The Programme shall only support actions and activities which present a potential EAV and in particular those which have: transnational character, particularly with regard to mobility and cooperation aimed at achieving a sustainable systemic impact; complementarity and synergy with other programmes and policies at national, Union and COM(2018) 50 final of 31 January 2018 “Mid-term evaluation of the Erasmus+ programme (2014-2020)” and the accompanying SWD(2018) 40 final. 
Program podpira samo tiste ukrepe in dejavnosti, ki predstavljajo morebitno evropsko dodano vrednost, zlasti tiste, ki imajo nadnacionalni značaj, zlasti v zvezi z mobilnostjo in sodelovanjem, katerih cilj je doseči trajnostni sistemski učinek, prinašajo dopolnjevanje in sinergijo z drugimi programi in politikami na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni ter na ravni Unije ter pomenijo prispevek k učinkoviti uporabi orodij Unije za preglednost in priznavanje.5 Nadnacionalni značaj in sistemski učinek 15.
Transnational character and systemic impact 15. The transnational character is by definition present. 
Nadnacionalni značaj je zagotovljen že s samo opredelitvijo programa.
Study, training or work placements abroad are the sine qua non condition of the mobility actions in KA1: a mobility of individuals, either for study, placement, training course, job-shadowing or teaching. By January 2018 more than 2.3 million learners and practitioners had benefitted from Erasmus+ mobility under Education and Training and Youth6. Figure 5 shows the number of participants who have undergone Erasmus+ mobility by country during the period 2014-2016. 
Študij, usposabljanje in delovna praksa v tujini so nujen pogoj za ukrepe mobilnosti v okviru ključnega ukrepa 1, tj. mobilnost posameznikov zaradi študija, delovne prakse, usposabljanja, sledenja na delovnem mestu ali poučevanja. Do januarja 2018 je v projektih mobilnosti na področju izobraževanja, usposabljanja in mladih v okviru programa Erasmus+ sodelovalo več kot 2,3 milijona učečih se in strokovnjakov iz prakse.6 Na sliki 5 je prikazano število udeležencev, ki so bili vključeni v mobilnost v okviru programa Erasmus+, po državah za obdobje 2014–2016.
5 6 Article 3 of the Regulation. 
17 5 6 Člen 3 Uredbe.
Source: DG EAC Dashboard. 
Vir: Dashboard GD EAC
Mobility by design is “aimed at” achieving a systemic impact on the education and training systems of the Programme and partner countries7. At this stage, the institutions and schools we visited were not yet able to demonstrate a particular systemic effect of their projects either on their institutions or at national level. 
Mobilnost je sama po sebi namenjena doseganju sistemskega učinka na sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja držav programa in partnerskih držav.7 V tej fazi obiskane institucije in šole še niso mogle prikazati določnega sistemskega učinka svojih projektov na ravni institucij ali nacionalni ravni.
The Commission recognises that the systemic effect on education and training systems is “less visible” and that “the evidence of the exploitation of project results by policy makers and the effective engagement of the latter when they are not included in the project itself is not always clear”8 and “there is only anecdotal evidence that the programme is changing institutions’ approaches to pedagogy and their target groups”9. 18. 
Komisija se zaveda, da je sistemski učinek na sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja manj opazen in da ni vedno dokazov o tem, da snovalci politike uporabljajo rezultate projektov, niti ni vedno jasno, da se ti dejansko angažirajo, kadar niso vključeni v sam projekt,8 poleg tega pa obstajajo le nesistematični dokazi, da se zaradi programa spreminja pristop institucij k pedagogiki in njihovim ciljnim skupinam.9 18.
Indeed, as stated in the legal basis, individual projects are not required to have a systemic impact. 
Kot je navedeno v pravni podlagi, ni potrebno, da bi imeli posamezni projekti sistemski učinek.
It is the cumulative result of those projects that should contribute to achieving systemic impact and thus such impact may only be visible at the end of the Programme. 
K doseganju sistemskega učinka bi moral prispevati kumulativen rezultat teh projektov, zato je mogoče, da je ta učinek opazen šele na koncu programa.
The Programme Guide states that “in the long run the combined effect of the several thousands of projects supported under this Key Action is expected to have an impact on the systems of education, training and youth in the participating countries, thus stimulating policy reforms”10. Complementarity and synergy with other programmes and policies 19. 
V Vodniku za prijavitelje je navedeno, da bo predvidoma imel skupni dolgoročni vpliv več tisoč projektov, ki jih podpira ta ključni ukrep, učinek na sisteme izobraževanja, usposabljanja in mladine v sodelujočih državah, kar bo spodbudilo reforme politik.10 Dopolnjevanje in sinergija z drugimi programi in politikami 19.
The complementarity and synergy with other programmes and policies are intended to be primarily ensured by the contribution of Erasmus+ to the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy, including the headline education targets. 
Dopolnjevanje in sinergija z drugimi programi in politikami naj bi se zagotavljala predvsem s prispevkom programa Erasmus+ k ciljem strategije Evropa 2020, vključno s krovnim ciljem izobraževanja.
SWD(2018) 40, p. 
SWD (2018) 40, str.
2. ibid, p. 
2. Prav tam, str.
Programme Guide, European Commission, Directorate General for Education and Culture, Brussels, 2016, p. 
Vodnik za prijavitelje, Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za izobraževanje in kulturo, Bruselj, 2016, str.
Whilst Erasmus+ does contribute to the mobility benchmarks, there is no apparent link between KA1 and the headline education target indicator set out in Annex I to the Regulation, as explained in paragraphs 57 and 58 below. 
Čeprav program Erasmus+ prispeva k doseganju referenčnih meril za mobilnost, ni vidne povezave med ključnim ukrepom 1 in kazalnikom krovnega cilja izobraževanja, določenim v Prilogi I k Uredbi, kot je pojasnjeno v odstavkih 57 in 58 v nadaljevanju.
The Commission has set out the link between Erasmus+ and Europe 2020 and ET 2020: “The programme is aimed at boosting skills, employability and the modernisation of education, training and youth systems and supports actions, cooperation projects and tools linked to policy priorities of ET 2020. 
Povezavo med programom Erasmus+ ter strategijo Evropa 2020 in Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2020 je prikazala Komisija, in sicer je program namenjen izboljševanju spretnosti in zaposljivosti ter modernizaciji sistemov izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter sistemov za mlade in podpira ukrepe, projekte sodelovanja in orodja, povezana s prioritetami politike Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2020.
By doing so, it also contributes to the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy, in particular the country-specific recommendations in the field of education and training. 
Na ta način prispeva tudi k izvajanju strategije Evropa 2020, zlasti priporočil za posamezne države na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja.
Investment from Erasmus+ will benefit individuals, institutions and society as a whole, thus contributing to jobs, growth and competitiveness and enhancing prosperity and social inclusion”12. 22. 
Od vložkov v okviru programa Erasmus+ bodo imeli korist posamezniki, institucije in družba kot celota, kar bo prispevalo k odpiranju delovnih mest, rasti in konkurenčnosti ter bo povečevalo blaginjo in socialno vključenost.12 22.
In the programme countries we visited we found that the mobility measures do boost skills and employability, notably in the VET sector. 
Sodišče je v obiskanih državah ugotovilo, da ukrepi mobilnosti v resnici izboljšujejo spretnosti in zaposljivost, zlasti v poklicnem izobraževanju in usposabljanju.
At the Programme level, the Mid-term evaluation contains evidence that HE and VET students who have participated in mobility have better employment and salary prospects than their non-mobile equivalents, although much of this evidence so far relates to predecessor programmes. 
Na ravni programa vmesna ocena vsebuje dokaze o tem, da imajo visokošolski študentje in dijaki v poklicnem izobraževanju in usposabljanju, ki so sodelovali v mobilnosti, boljše možnosti za zaposlitev in boljše plače kot njihovi vrstniki, ki niso bili vključeni v mobilnost, čeprav se veliko teh dokazov zaenkrat nanaša na prejšnje programe.
Feedback from participants reveals very high satisfaction with Erasmus+ mobility and its effect on their employability. 
Povratne informacije udeležencev kažejo, da so zelo zadovoljni z mobilnostjo v okviru programa Erasmus+ in njenim učinkom na njihovo zaposljivost.
For example, 93.8 % of respondents as at January 2018 declared that they had increased their key competences. 
Na primer, do januarja 2018 je 93,8 % anketirancev izjavilo, da so se njihove ključne kompetence izboljšale.
93 % of staff say they learnt new good practices, 75 % stating that they had returned with practical skills relevant for their Article 4 of the Regulation. 
93 % zaposlenih je izjavilo, da so se seznanili z novimi dobrimi praksami, 75 %, da so pridobili nove praktične spretnosti, ki so bile pomembne za njihovo takratno delo, 79,1 % pa, da se je povečala njihova zaposljivost.13 Te povratne informacije so sicer poučne in spodbudne, vendar so lahko subjektivne (glej odstavke 80 do 82).
The 2015 Erasmus+ Annual Report sets out the link between Erasmus+ and other EU policy developments, such as the European Fund for Strategic Investments (education and training to restore jobs and growth), and states that “throughout 2015 Erasmus+ implemented the existing EU policy agendas of promoting inclusive learning mobility and cooperation between the various stakeholders involved in the education, training and youth sectors”14. 25. 
V letnem poročilu za program Erasmus+ za leto 2015 je prikazana povezava med tem programom in novostmi v okviru drugih politik EU, kot je Evropski sklad za strateške naložbe (izobraževanje in usposabljanje za oživitev rasti in zaposlovanje). Polege tega je navedeno, da so se s programom Erasmus+ izvajali programi drugih obstoječih politik EU za spodbujanje vključujoče učne mobilnosti in sodelovanja med raznimi deležniki na področju izobraževanja, usposabljanja in mladih.14 25.
Some Member States use other EU funds to finance mobility via the Erasmus+ mechanisms. 
Nekatere države članice za financiranje mobilnosti v okviru mehanizmov Erasmus+ uporabljajo še druga sredstva EU.
For example, Poland tailored its European Social Fund (ESF) Operational Programme in 2016 to finance 2 500 School Education participants and 17 200 VET participants in Erasmus+. 
Portugalska, na primer, je leta 2016 operativni program Evropskega socialnega sklada zasnovala tako, da je v njegovem okviru financirala udeležbo 2 500 sodelujočih iz šol in 17 200 iz poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja v Erasmus+.
Disadvantaged students also receive additional funds from the ESF. 
Udeleženci s posebnimi potrebami prav tako prejmejo dodatna sredstva iz Evropskega socialnega sklada.
Contribution to the effective use of EU transparency and recognition tools Transparency 26. 
Prispevek k učinkoviti uporabi orodij EU za preglednost in priznavanje Preglednost 26.
27. 
15 27.
120 factsheets and 10 videos have been produced on the success stories selected in 2015 and 2016, giving further visibility to these projects. 
Za izbrane zgodbe o uspehu je bilo v letih 2015 in 2016 pripravljenih 120 informativnih pregledov in 10 videov, s čimer so postali ti projekti še bolj vidni.
They have been promoted via social media, websites and DG EAC's newsletter, as well as during events. In 2017 the Source: DG EAC Dashboard. 
Promovirani so bili po družbenih medijih, na spletiščih in v biltenu Generalnega direktorata za izobraževanje in kulturo ter med dogodki.
3 and 4. 
3 in 4.
Programme Guide, p. 
Vodnik za prijavitelje, str.
Erasmus+ is the biggest DG-specific Facebook page in the Commission (with nearly 300 000 followers). 
Stran Erasmus+ na Facebooku je največja posamična stran tega generalnega direktorata v Komisiji (s skoraj 300 000 sledilci).