natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Detailed written guidance for experts on the interpretation of award criteria is available in CEF-E and, since 2018, in CEF-T. 
Pri IPE – energetika imajo strokovnjaki na voljo podrobna pisna navodila za razlago meril za dodelitev sredstev, od leta 2018 pa tudi pri IPE – promet.
29 Box 3 Examples of issues with the interpretation of award criteria The external observers’ reports highlight issues with the clarity of criteria: “Ensure that the detailed descriptions of the award criteria and sub-criteria are consistent throughout the evaluation: e.g. in some consensus meetings, the experts had used slightly different descriptions of the criteria that were not listed in the call preparation material.” (CEF ICT, 2017 calls) “There are always some problems with the interpretation and application of the award criteria. (...) 
V skladu s poročili je treba zagotoviti, da so podrobni opisi meril in podmeril za dodelitev sredstev med celotnim postopkom vrednotenja dosledni. Opazovalci ugotavljajo, da so strokovnjaki na nekaterih sestankih za doseganje soglasja uporabljali nekoliko drugačne opise meril, ki niso bili navedeni v pripravljalnem gradivu za razpis (IPE – IKT, razpisi iz leta 2017). Opazovalci menijo, da je bilo v zvezi z razlago in uporabo meril za dodelitev sredstev vedno nekaj težav.
During this phase it was important, as regularly observed, to occasionally remind evaluators what specific evaluation criteria mean in specific contexts (for instance, how to interpret maturity in the case of works, studies and for mixed projects) and that marks must be consistent with comments and remarks. 
Kot so opazili, je bilo v tej fazi pomembno ocenjevalce občasno opozoriti na to, kaj določena ocenjevalna merila pomenijo v posebnih okoliščinah (na primer, kako se razlaga izdelanost del, študij in mešanih projektov) in da mora biti število točk skladno s komentarji in pripombami.
In some consensus meetings it was observed that experts took different views on what was explicit in the proposal and what could be inferred from the description of the proposal.” 
Na nekaterih sestankih za doseganje soglasja so opazili, da so imeli strokovnjaki različna mnenja o tem, kaj je bilo izrecno navedeno v predlogu in kaj je mogoče sklepati iz opisa predloga (IPE – promet, razpisi iz leta 2014 v okviru letnega in večletnega delovnega programa).
(CEF-T, annual and multi-annual work programme calls, 2014) 55 The thorough assessment of the criteria “maturity” and “quality” is key for anticipating issues that may affect the timely implementation of projects. 
55 Zlasti temeljita ocena meril izdelanosti in kakovosti je ključna za predvidevanje težav, ki bi lahko vplivale na pravočasno izvajanje projektov.
Insufficiently realistic planning was cited by INEA as one of the main reasons why implementation lags behind schedule. 
Agencija INEA je kot enega od glavnih razlogov za to, zakaj je izvajanje počasnejše od časovnega načrta, navedla, da načrtovanje ni dovolj realistično.
The main issues identified by external experts with regard to the maturity of projects concern land acquisition, environmental impact assessments and financial or technical readiness. 
Zunanji strokovnjaki so kot glavne težave v zvezi z izdelanostjo projektov opredelili pridobivanje zemljišč, presoje vplivov na okolje ter finančno in tehnično pripravljenost.
56 We found that experts cannot always properly assess the maturity of projects based on the documents submitted in an application. 
56 Sodišče je ugotovilo, da strokovnjaki na podlagi dokumentov, predloženih v vlogi, ne morejo vedno ustrezno oceniti izdelanosti projektov.
Works can start up to 18 months after the submission of a proposal. 
Dela se lahko začnejo tudi do 18 mesecev po predložitvi predloga.
Also, projects may include both studies and works, or works may be carried out in parallel with studies in a separate project. 
Poleg tega lahko projekti vključujejo tako študije kot dela ali pa se dela izvedejo hkrati s študijami v ločenem projektu.
This means that a project may be submitted although the works component is still at an early stage of maturity. 
To pomeni, da je projekt mogoče predložiti, čeprav je komponenta v zvezi z deli še vedno v zgodnji fazi izdelanosti.
The assessment of maturity for such projects is challenging, because much relevant information will not be known until the study is completed. 
Ocenjevanje izdelanosti takih projektov je zahtevno, saj številne pomembne informacije niso znane do zaključka študije.
There is a risk that the CEF will not be fully implemented 57 We examined the state of play regarding the implementation of the CEF budget and the action INEA has taken to ensure it is being used. 
Obstaja tveganje, da IPE ne bo izveden v celoti 57 Sodišče je preučilo trenutno stanje izvrševanja proračuna IPE in ukrepanje agencije INEA za zagotovitev njegove porabe.
To achieve concrete benefits in the transport, energy and telecommunications sectors, the budget needs to be managed soundly and spent on relevant and suitable investment projects which are then implemented on a timely basis. 
Za dosego konkretnih koristi v prometnem, energetskem in telekomunikacijskem sektorju je treba proračun upravljati preudarno in ga porabljati za relevantne in ustrezne naložbene projekte, ki se nato pravočasno izvedejo.
There is a risk of under-execution of the CEF 58 The CEF Regulation itself estimated funding needs for transport, telecommunications and energy that were substantially higher than the €33 billion available in the 2014-2020 budget24. The regulation for the predecessor 2007-2013 TEN-T programme gave a similar assessment. 
Obstaja tveganje nezadostnega izvajanja IPE 58 V uredbi o IPE so bile ocenjene potrebe po financiranju na področju prometa, telekomunikacij in energije, ki so bile bistveno višje od 33 milijard EUR na voljo v proračunu za obdobje 2014–2020.24 V uredbi za predhodni instrument, program TEN-T za obdobje 2007–2013, je bila podobna ocena.
59 Despite these stated needs, the 2007-2013 TEN-T budget was not entirely used. 
59 Kljub navedenim potrebam se proračun za TEN-T za obdobje 2007–2013 ni v celoti porabil.
The absorption rate, at closure, was 74 % of the budget, with €5.5 billion actually used out of a total of €7.4 billion25. 
Stopnja črpanja sredstev je ob zaključku znašala 74 % proračuna.
However, the entire budget had been awarded to projects. Delayed and under-executed infrastructure projects were the main reason for the slow use of funding, which eventually adversely impacted overall programme implementation. 
Glavni razlog za počasno porabo finančnih sredstev so bili zamude in nezadostna izvedba infrastrukturnih projektov, ki so sčasoma negativno vplivali na splošno izvajanje programa.
60 INEA monitors the progress of the implementation, but does not compare it, mutatis mutandis, to the implementation rate for the predecessor programme. 
60 Agencija INEA spremlja napredek pri izvajanju, ki pa ga smiselno ne primerja s stopnjo izvajanja predhodnega programa.
Nevertheless, several elements indicate that the use of EU funding is still slow for the current programme. 
Kljub temu več elementov kaže na to, da je poraba sredstev EU pri trenutnem programu še vedno počasna.
INEA had planned for the cumulative amount of budgetary commitments to be €19 billion in 2018, but the actual level stood at €14 billion, i.e. 26 % lower than expected26. By January 2019, five years into the programming period, less than one quarter of the CEF funds awarded to projects had resulted in payments (see Table 4). 
Glede na načrt agencije INEA bi moral kumulativni znesek prevzetih proračunskih obveznosti v letu 2018 znašati 19 milijard EUR, dejanska raven pa je bila 14 milijard EUR, tj. 26 % manj, kot je bilo pričakovano.26 Do januarja 2019, pet let po začetku programskega obdobja, je bilo izplačanih manj kot četrtina sredstev IPE, dodeljenih projektom (glej tabelo 4).
25 The absorption rate for TEN-T would have been even lower if TEN-T EA had not managed to commit about one third of the budget twice, by reinjecting funds from non-performing projects into new grants through “reflow calls” worth €2.3 billion. 
25 Stopnja črpanja sredstev za TEN-T bi bila še nižja, če agenciji TEN-T EA približno ene tretjine proračunskih sredstev ne bi uspelo dodeliti dvakrat, in sicer s ponovno vključitvijo sredstev iz neuspešnih projektov v nova nepovratna sredstva na podlagi 2,3 milijarde EUR vrednih razpisov reflow calls.
26 After signing grant agreements, INEA commits funds in line with planned payments for the relevant year. 
26 Agencija INEA po podpisu sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev sredstva dodeli v skladu z načrtovanimi plačili za zadevno leto.
Thus, budgetary commitments only reflect part of the budget granted to projects. 
Prevzete proračunske obveznosti tako odražajo le del proračuna, dodeljenega projektom. 32
31 Telecom 228 208 100 44 % Synergy 21 21 8 40 % Grand total 25 519 13 933 5 940 23 % Source: Information provided by INEA, January 2019. 61 The payment rate is particularly low for CEF-E and CEF-T at 17 % and 24 % respectively of the initial budget. 
Tabela 4 – Izvajanje IPE za obdobje 2014–2020 v milijonih EUR 33 Nepovratna sredstva, dodeljena projektom Prevzete proračunske obveznosti Plačila % plačil/ nepovratnih sredstev Promet 22 870 11 868 5 416 24 % Energetika 2 400 1 836 416 17 % Telekomunikacije 228 208 100 44 % Sinergija 21 21 8 40 % Vse skupaj 25 519 13 933 5 940 23 % Vir: informacije, ki jih je zagotovila agencija INEA (stanje januarja 2019) 61 Stopnja plačil je še posebej nizka za IPE – energetika in IPE – promet, v okviru katerih znaša 17 % oziroma 24 % prvotnih proračunskih sredstev.
This low rate is traceable to the delayed implementation of projects. 
Razlog za to nizko stopnjo je zamuda pri izvajanju projektov.
By January 2019, the grant agreements for 76 projects (total EU grants of €4 billion) were modified to postpone the implementation deadline by at least one year. 
Do januarja 2019 so bili sporazumi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev za 76 projektov (v skupni vrednosti nepovratnih sredstev EU v višini 4 milijarde EUR) spremenjeni tako, da se je rok za izvajanje podaljšal vsaj za eno leto.
However, we found that these changes only reflect a small number of delays. 
Vendar je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so te spremembe odražale le majhno število zamud.
In reality, far more projects are delayed, as demonstrated by INEA’s internal analysis: o For CEF-T, a mid-term review (MTR) took stock of the implementation of a sample of 356 projects. 
V resnici prihaja do zamud pri veliko več projektih, kar je razvidno iz notranje analize agencije INEA: o za IPE – promet je bilo z vmesnim pregledom ocenjeno izvajanje vzorca 356 projektov.
More than half of the projects were delayed: 156 by a year or more and 50 by less than a year. 
Pri več kot polovici projektov so bile zamude: pri 156 projektih so trajale vsaj eno leto, pri 50 projektih pa manj kot eno leto.
On average, the delay at completion was 10.7 months. o For CEF-E, at the end of 2017, around two thirds of 39 ongoing projects reviewed by INEA were not fully on track: average delay 6.5 months. 
Ob zaključku so zamude v povprečju trajale 10,7 meseca, o pri IPE – energetika so bile ob koncu leta 2017 pri približno dveh tretjinah od 39 tekočih projektov, ki jih je pregledala agencija INEA, zamude, ki so v povprečju znašale 6,5 meseca.
Projects incurring delays often lacked maturity when submitted 62 The parent DGs plan calls for proposals, and thus decide on the distribution of the budget (paragraphs 39 to 40 ). 
Projekti, pri katerih prihaja do zamud, ob predložitvi pogosto niso dovolj izdelani 62 Pristojni generalni direktorati načrtujejo razpise za zbiranje predlogov in s tem odločajo o razdelitvi proračunskih sredstev (odstavka 39 in 40).
For this reason, INEA granted much of the CEF budget early in the programming period, with 85 % of CEF-T awarded through the 2014 and 2015 calls. 
Tako je v okviru razpisov iz let 2014 in 2015 dodelila 85 % sredstev za IPE – promet.
The CEF-T budget for 2014 alone was €12 billion - or 52 % of the total of €23 billion for the period. 
Proračun za IPE – promet je samo za leto 2014 znašal 12 milijard EUR ali 52 % skupnega zneska za to obdobje v višini 23 milijard EUR.
63 Because so much of the budget was allocated to the first calls, and it was difficult for applicants to predict future calls, some projects selected were not mature enough. 
63 Ker je bilo toliko proračunskih sredstev dodeljenih v okviru prvih razpisov in ker so vložniki težko predvideli prihodnje razpise, nekateri izbrani projekti niso bili dovolj izdelani.
64 In the absence of multiannual call planning, beneficiaries submitted applications despite the fact that the maturity of some projects could have benefitted from submission at a later stage. 
64 Ker večletnega načrta razpisov ni bilo, so upravičenci vlagali vloge kljub temu, da bi nekateri projekti imeli več koristi od tega, če bi bili predloženi kasneje.
INEA’s internal analysis revealed that the low maturity of initial proposals was a common cause of delayed projects. 
Notranja analiza agencije INEA je pokazala, da je bila pomanjkljiva izdelanost prvotnih predlogov pogost razlog za zamude pri projektih.
Box 4 presents an example of an immature project. 
V okviru 4 je primer neizdelanega projekta.
For eight of the 12 projects27 that have so far been terminated prematurely, the reason was the immaturity of the projects. 
Pri osmih od 12 projektov27, ki so bili doslej predčasno končani, je bil razlog za to neizdelanost projektov.
32 Box 4 Example of an immature project: Construction of an energy interconnection between two Member States Two applications relating to design and construction works for an energy interconnection between two Member States were submitted in a 2014 CEF-E call. 
34 Okvir 4 Primer neizdelanega projekta: gradnja energetskih povezav med dvema državama članicama Na razpisu IPE – energetika iz leta 2014 sta bili za zasnovo in gradbena dela v zvezi z energetsko povezavo med dvema državama članicama vloženi dve vlogi.
The experts awarded the works project only three out of five points for maturity. 
Strokovnjaki so gradbenemu projektu za izdelanost dodelili le tri od petih točk.
The project received the minimum score for financing, but the overall assessment was that it was not ready. 
Projekt je sicer prejel minimalno število točk za financiranje, toda na splošno je bilo ocenjeno, da še ni pripravljen.
Both projects were selected, with the works project not due to start until May 2016. 
Izbrana sta bila oba projekta, pri čemer naj bi se gradbeni projekt začel izvajati šele maja 2016.
At the end of 2018, the study project was delayed by 22 months. 
Konec leta 2018 je imel študijski projekt zamudo, ki je znašala 22 mesecev.
The works project was delayed by 24 months. 
Gradbeni projekt je imel zamudo, ki je trajala 24 mesecev.
Delays are monitored, but this does not ensure that effective corrective measures are taken on time 65 It is essential for INEA to monitor the technical and financial implementation of projects closely so that effective corrective measures can be taken in time. 
Zamude she spremljajo, vendar pa to ne zagotavlja pravočasnega sprejetja popravljalnih ukrepov 65 Za agencijo INEA je bistveno, da pozorno spremlja tehnično in finančno izvajanje projektov, da je mogoče pravočasno sprejeti uspešne popravne ukrepe.
The use of funding can be accelerated by decommitting funds from underperforming projects and reinjecting them into others. 
Porabo sredstev je mogoče pospešiti s sprostitvijo sredstev, dodeljenih premalo uspešnim projektom, da bi se porabila za naložbe v druge projekte.
If a project does not use its entire grant, the unused amounts can be made available for other projects through a new call for proposals. 
Če se pri projektu vsa nepovratna sredstva ne porabijo, se lahko neporabljeni zneski dajo na voljo za druge projekte na podlagi novega razpisa za zbiranje predlogov.
This is only possible if the status of projects is sufficiently closely monitored to detect weak implementation. 
To je mogoče le, če se status projektov dovolj pozorno spremlja, da se odkrije slabo izvajanje.
Grant agreements do not directly link funding to the achievement of milestones 66 INEA supervises the implementation of supported activities on the basis of grant agreements. 
V sporazumih o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev financiranje ni odvisno od doseganja mejnikov 66 Agencija INEA na podlagi sporazumov o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev nadzoruje izvajanje dejavnosti, ki se podpirajo.
Though the agreements contain provisions that allow INEA to terminate an action if there is insufficient progress, the deadlines for the implementation of specific milestones are not directly linked to the EU funding. 
Čeprav sporazumi vsebujejo določbe, na podlagi katerih lahko agencija INEA prekine ukrep, pri katerem ni zadostnega napredka, roki za izvedbo konkretnih mejnikov niso neposredno povezani s financiranjem EU.
Action status reports do not always disclose project delays 67 INEA uses action status reports (ASRs) to monitor the technical and financial implementation of CEF-E and CEF-T projects. 
V poročilih o stanju ukrepa zamude pri projektih niso zmeraj razkrite 67 Agencija INEA za spremljanje tehničnega in finančnega izvajanja projektov IPE – energetika in IPE – promet uporablja poročila o stanju ukrepov.
ASRs are annual progress reports 27 This is, however, a small share of the 1 233 selected projects. 
Poročila o stanju ukrepov so letna poročila o napredku, ki jih pripravi upravičenec.
prepared by the beneficiary. They give some indication of project progress, but there is a risk that they will not always describe the full extent of delays or underspending, despite the fact that grant agreements require beneficiaries to report this. 
Vsebujejo določene informacije o napredku projekta, obstaja pa tveganje, da z njimi ne bo vedno opisan celoten obseg zamud ali premajhne porabe, čeprav morajo upravičenci v skladu s sporazumi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev o njih poročati.
Our analysis of a sample of ASRs28 indicated that delays with an impact on the project implementation period were not always fully reported. Instead they were identified later, during the MTR. 
Sodišče je v svoji analizi vzorca poročil o stanju ukrepa28 navedlo, da se o zamudah, ki vplivajo na obdobje izvajanja projektov, ne poroča vedno v celoti, temveč se ugotovijo šele kasneje, z vmesnim pregledom.
Only CEF-T has a mid-term review and a fixed end date for implementation 68 In 2010, aware of the challenges posed by non-performing projects for the effective use of funds, DG MOVE decided that funds not used by a project within a specified period would be withdrawn from that project and returned to the budget to be reallocated to others. 
Vmesni pregled in fiksen končni datum za izvajanje sta predvidena samo pri IPE – promet 68 Leta 2010 se je GD MOVE zaradi izzivov, ki jih za uspešno porabo sredstev predstavljajo neuspešni projekti, odločil, da bodo sredstva, ki ne bodo porabljena za projekt v določenem obdobju, iz tega projekta umaknjena in vrnjena v proračun, da se predodelijo drugim.
In this context, DG MOVE established a final deadline of 31 December 2023 for the implementation of CEF-T, meaning that no grant agreement could be signed or extended beyond that date. 
V zvezi s tem je GD MOVE kot končni rok za izvajanje IPE – promet določil 31. december 2023, kar pomeni, da bo sporazume o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev mogoče sklepati in podaljševati le do tega datuma.
This is a necessary basis for decommitments, since otherwise projects could be extended indefinitely even without progress. 
To je nujna podlaga za sprostitve, saj bi se projekti sicer lahko podaljševali za nedoločen čas tudi brez napredka.
Furthermore, through the 2017/2018 MTR of 356 projects, INEA conducted an extensive analysis of the implementation status of the CEF-T project portfolio. 
Poleg tega je agencija INEA v okviru vmesnega pregleda 356 projektov za obdobje 2017/2018 opravila obsežno analizo statusa izvajanja portfelja projektov IPE – promet.
With the help of external experts, it assessed project progress and proposed adaptations to technical scope, budgets and implementation conditions. 
S pomočjo zunanjih strokovnjakov je ocenila napredek pri projektih in predlagala prilagoditve tehničnega področja uporabe, proračuna in izvedbenih pogojev.
By analysing the situation more realistically, it revealed more delays than the ASRs and thus allowed the spending profiles of several projects to be adjusted (see Figure 4). 
35 prilagoditi profile porabe več projektov (glej sliko 4).
More than half of the 139 actions due to end by April 2019 needed an extended implementation deadline or a reduction in funding. 
Pri več kot polovici od 139 ukrepov, ki naj bi se zaključili do aprila 2019, je bilo treba podaljšati rok za izvajanje ali zmanjšati financiranje.
Figure 4 – Comparison of aggregated spending profiles of CEF-T projects, according to grant agreements, ASRs and the MTR, in billion € 34 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 7.8 8.0 7.8 7.5 7.2 7.3 7.5 6.4 6.7 4.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 2014 1.5 1.1 1.1 2015 2016 2017 Eligible Costs (GA in force) 2018 Eligible Costs (ASR) 2019 Eligible Costs (MTR) 2020 After 2020 2.8 2.8 4.0 4.0 6.5 6.3 0.0 6.5 NB: A spending profile is the budget allocated to a project over the years of its implementation. 
Slika 4 – Primerjava združenih profilov porabe projektov IPE – promet glede na sporazume o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev, poročila o stanju ukrepa in vmesni pregled (v milijardah EUR) 36 9,0 8,0 7,0 6,0 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 7,8 8,0 7,8 7,5 4,1 6,4 7,3 0,8 1,5 1,1 1,1 0,7 0,7 2,8 2,8 4,0 4,0 6,5 6,3 7,5 7,2 6,7 0,0 6,5 2014 Upravičeni stroški (veljavni sporazum o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev) Upravičeni stroški (poročilo o stanju ukrepa) Upravičeni stroški (vmesni pregled) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Po letu 2020 Opomba: Profil porabe je proračun, dodeljen projektu v letih njegovega izvajanja.
Source: INEA mid-term review, 2018. 69 This led to the recovery of €46 million from these 139 projects. 
Vir: vmesni pregled agencije INEA (2018) 69 Na podlagi tega je bilo v zvezi s temi 139 projekti izterjanih 46 milijonov EUR.
For the remaining 217 projects, the MTR concluded that decommitments might eventually amount to one billion euro, i.e. twenty times more than the sum recovered. 
Za preostalih 217 projektov je bilo v vmesnem pregledu ugotovljeno, da bi lahko sprostitve na koncu znašale eno milijardo EUR, tj. dvajsetkrat več od izterjanega zneska.
There has not yet been a formal decision as to how to act upon this information. 
O tem, kako ukrepati v zvezi s temi informacijami, še ni bila sprejeta uradna odločitev.
According to our interviews with INEA staff, future decommitments might be even higher. 
Glede na razgovore Sodišča z uslužbenci agencije INEA bi lahko prihodnje sprostitve bile še višje.
70 In CEF-E, there are no plans to reduce grants and re-inject funds into the programme. 
70 Pri IPE – energetika ni načrtov za zmanjšanje nepovratnih sredstev in njihovo ponovno vključitev v program.
There is no final implementation deadline and no MTR exercise. 
Ni ne končnega roka za izvedbo ne vmesnega pregleda.
To date, implementation has been slower for energy than for transport (see Table 4). 
Doslej je bilo izvajanje v energetskem sektorju počasnejše kot v prometnem (glej tabelo 4).
As a consequence, the implementation of CEF-E could be delayed well beyond the end of the programming period. 
Zato bi se izvajanje IPE – energetika lahko zavleklo občutno dlje kot le do konca programskega obdobja.
INEA’s corrective steps for projects that are not on track do not fully address the risks 71 Although INEA is able to forecast absorption rates quite accurately through its various monitoring tools, the action taken so far has not fully addressed the present risks. 
Agencija INEA s popravljalnimi ukrepi za projekte, ki imajo zamude, tveganj ne obravnava v celoti 71 Čeprav lahko agencija INEA z različnimi orodji za spremljanje zelo natančno predvidi stopnje črpanja, se z dosedanjim ukrepanjem obstoječa tveganja ne obravnavajo v celoti.