natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 151 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 5.39. Theauditcoveredtheassistanceprovidedtothethree countries to improve their capacity in the areas of border control, migration/asylum management, the fight against organised crime and the judiciary and good governance. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 151 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 5.39 Revizija je vključevala pomoč, zagotovljeno tem trem državam za izboljšanje njihovih zmogljivosti na področju nadzora mej, obvladovanja migracij/azilske politike, boja proti organiziranemu kriminalu ter sodstva in dobrega upra­ vljanja.
The greater part of the assistance was delivered through inter­ national organisations (United Nations agencies, the Inter­ national Organisation for Migration, the Council of Europe, etc). 
Večji del pomoči je bil zagotovljen s posredovanjem mednarodnih organizacij (agencij Združenih narodov, Medna­ rodne organizacije za migracije, Sveta Evrope itd.).
Until 2007 the TACIS programme financed most of the assistance, since then the principal source of funds is the European Neighbourhood and Partnership (ENP) Instrument. 
Do leta 2007 se je večina pomoči financirala iz programa TACIS, po tem letu pa je glavni vir sredstev evropski instrument sosedstva in partnerstva.
5.40. TherecommendationsmadebytheCourtinSR No 9/2008 tackled concrete weaknesses related to the specific projects audited, as well as general issues related to the planning and the implementation of the cooperation aid to these countries. 
5.40 Priporočila Sodišča v posebnem poročilu št. 9/2008 so se nanašala na konkretne slabosti v zvezi s posameznimi revi­ diranimi projekti ter splošne zadeve v zvezi z načrtovanjem in izvajanjem pomoči za zunanje sodelovanje za te države.
All the recommendations were fully adopted by the Council (15) and the Parliament (16). 
Svet (15) in Parlament (16) sta vsa priporočila v celoti sprejela.
5.41. InOctober2009,theCommissionissuedaworking document on the follow-up to the 2007 Discharge Decision of the European Parliament (17) making reference to the recom­ mendations of SR No 9/2008. 
5.41 Komisijajeoktobra2009izdaladelovnidokumento nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi sklepa Evropskega parla­ menta o razrešnici za leto 2007 (17), v katerem odgovarja na priporočila iz posebnega poročila št.
The Commission provided evidence that the EU delegations in Chisinau and in Kiev supported the cooperation between the European Union border assistance mission to Moldova and Ukraine (EUBAM) and Frontex at policy and operation level. 
9/2008. Spremljanje izvajanja priporočil 5.42 Komisijajezagotoviladokazilaotem,dastadelegaciji EU v Kišinjevu in Kijevu podpirali sodelovanje med misijo EU za pomoč na meji med Moldavijo in Ukrajino (EUBAM) in FRONTEX na ravni politike in operativni ravni.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S _____________ (15) Council of the European Union: Draft Council conclusions 6932/09 of 26 February 2009. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E _____________ (15) Svet Evropske unije, 6932/09 z dne 26. februarja 2009, osnutek sklepov Sveta.
(16) European Parliament: Resolution of the European Parliament of 23 April 2009 with observations forming an integral part of the Decision on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2007, Section III — Commission and executive agencies (P6_TA(2009) 289). 
(16) Evropski parlament, Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. aprila 2009 s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepa o razreš­ nici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, Oddelek III – Komisija in izvajalske agen­ cije. P6_TA(2009)0289.
(17) European Commission: Commission staff working document accompanying the report from the Commission to the European Parliament on the follow-up to 2007 Discharge Decision (SEC(2009) 1427 final, 16.10.2009). 5.42. 
(17) Evropska komisija, SEC(2009) 1427 konč., 6.10.2009, Delovni dokument služb Komisije, priložen poročilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi sklepov o razreš­ nici za leto 2007.
The Commission would like to underline the good collaboration between Frontex and the EU Delegation in Kiev and EUBAM. 
Komisija želi poudariti dobro sodelovanje med agencijo FRONTEX, delegacijo EU v Kijevu in misijo EUBAM. 5.42
EN 152 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 5.43. TheCommissionhasacceptedthatbeforereleasing further funds for centres for illegal migrants and asylum seekers it should make sure that the recipient government is committed to pay at least the running costs in order to ensure sustainability. 
SL 152 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 5.43 Komisija se je strinjala, da bi se morala pred sprostit­ vijo dodatnih sredstev za centre za nezakonite priseljence in prosilce za azil zaradi zagotavljanja trajnosti prepričati, da se je vlada zavezala, da bo plačala vsaj tekoče stroške.
Nevertheless, as highlighted by a recent Result Oriented Monitoring (ROM) report, there are some concerns about insufficient co-financing by partner countries. 
Kot je poudarjeno v nedavnem poročilu sistema spremljanja rezul­ tatov pa obstajajo nekateri pomisleki zaradi prenizkega sofi­ nanciranja, ki ga zagotavljajo partnerske države.
Indeed, an evaluation report commissioned by the Joint Evaluation Unit found that the resources allocated by the government of Ukraine to the running and maintenance of the migrant accommodation centres and the temporary holding facilities have been insufficient. 
Evalvacijsko poročilo, ki ga je naročila skupna enota za ocenjevanje, je ugotovilo, da so sredstva, ki jih ukrajinska vlada zagotavlja za obratovanje in vzdrževanje nastanitvenih centrov za prise­ ljence in začasnih centrov za pridržanje, nezadostna.
The Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) have denounced violations of the rights of refugees and asylum seekers. 
Organi­ zacije civilne družbe so javno obsodile kršitev pravic beguncev in prosilcev za azil.
In response, the Commission, before releasing further funds in this policy area, requested the recipient country to confirm in writing that they will cover the running costs of the financed infrastructure. 5.44. Thereisnocomprehensiveevaluationoftheprogress that the three countries have made on focusing the project activities on the issue of effective prosecution and on systematic information sharing between law enforcement bodies. 
Komisija se je odzvala tako, da je pred sprostitvijo dodatnih sredstev od države prejemnice zahtevala pisno zagotovilo, da bo krila tekoče stroške za financirano infrastrukturo. 5.44 Celovitaocenanapredka,kisogadosegletetridržave pri usmerjanju projektnih dejavnosti v uspešen pregon in siste­ matično izmenjavo informacij med organi kazenskega pregona, ne obstaja.
5.45. TheCommissionhaspresentedevidenceregardingthe involvement of the civil society in the development of an anti-corruption policy in Ukraine. 
5.45 Komisijajezagotoviladokazilavzvezizvključitvijo civilne družbe v razvoj protikorupcijske politike v Ukrajini.
However, it has not provided assessments on the efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of these projects. 
Ni pa zagotovila ocen učinkovitosti, uspešnosti in trajnosti teh projektov.
The individual projects implemented by the CSOs were not included in the ROM sample. 5.46. 
Posamezni projekti, ki jih izvajajo organizacije civilne družbe, niso bili vključeni v vzorec sistema spremljanja rezultatov.
TheEUdelegationsinUkraineandMoldovahave reorganised and strengthen their staff managing these operations. 
5.46 DelegacijiEUvUkrajiniinMoldavijistasereorgani­ zirali in povečali število zaposlenih, ki vodijo te operacije.
The delegation in Belarus has taken over partial responsibility for programme management from the Kiev delegation. 
Delegacija v Belorusiji je od delegacije v Kijevu prevzela delno odgovornost za upravljanje programov.
Nevertheless, the audit and evaluation of the aid interventions were not effectively managed by the delegations. 
Vendar pa dele­ gacije niso uspešno upravljale revidiranja in ocenjevanja ukrepov pomoči.
Since 2007, Sector Budget Support (SBS) and programme aid have increased while there are fewer Technical Assistance (TA) projects. 
5.47 Od leta 2007 so se sektorska proračunska podpora in sredstva za programe pomoči povečali, projektov tehnične pomoči pa je manj.
If PFM is weak, as identified in the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability assessment, and there is political instability in an environment of financial crisis, there are significant risks for the effective and efficient implementation of aid inter­ ventions (18). 
Če je slabo razvito, kot je pokazala ocena javne porabe in finančne odgo­ vornosti, in med finančno krizo pride do politične nestabil­ nosti, obstaja veliko tveganje za uspešno in učinkovito izva­ janje ukrepov pomoči (18).
No donors have to date adopted grant budget support to these countries although some development partners give budget support through loans. _____________ (18) See Special Report No 11/2010 on the Commission’s management of General Budget Support in ACP, Latin American and Asian Countries. 
Zaenkrat še noben donator ni odobril sredstev za proračunsko podporo za te države, čeprav nekateri razvojni partnerji zagotavljajo proračunsko podporo v obliki posojil. _____________ (18) Glej posebno poročilo št. 11/2010 – Kako je Komisija upravljala splošno proračunsko podporo v državah AKP ter latinskoameriških in azijskih državah.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 5.43. Prior to launching the tender, the EU Delegation in Kiev provided the beneficiaries under the readmission assistance programme, namely the Ukrainian Ministry of Interior and the Ukrainian State Border Guards Service, with a cost estimate regarding the running costs for the infrastructure to be built with EU funds (water, electricity, gas etc.). 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 5.43 Delegacija EU v Kijevu je pred začetkom javnega naročila upravičencem, tj. ukrajinskemu ministrstvu za notranje zadeve in ukrajinski službi državne mejne straže, v okviru programa pomoči za ponovni sprejem zagotovila oceno stroškov v zvezi s tekočimi stroški za infrastrukturo (za vodo, elektriko, plin itd.), ki naj bi se zgradila s sredstvi EU.
Only after both beneficiaries confirmed in writing that they will be able to provide the necessary funds for running the buildings and also pay for the necessary services and trained personnel to operate the facilities, the EU Delegation launched the tender in December 2010. 5.44. 
Šele ko sta oba upravičenca pisno potrdila, da bosta lahko zagotovila potrebna sredstva za upravljanje stavb ter plačilo potrebnih storitev in usposobljenega osebja za delovanje objektov, je delegacija EU decembra 2010 začela javno naročilo.
Despite the absence of comprehensive evaluation, the Commission continuously monitors progress made in this area and 6 million euro are planned as accompanying measures to the 2010 ‘Support to the Border Management Sector Policy’ budget support, which includes information sharing between individual entities of law enforcement bodies. 
5.44 Čeprav ni celovite ocene, Komisija nenehno spremlja napredek na tem področju. Sredstva v višini 6 milijonov EUR so kot spremljevalni ukrepi v okviru proračunske podpore za leto 2010 namenjena podpori politike sektorja upravljanja meja, kar vključuje izmenjavo informacij med posameznimi subjekti organov kazenskega pregona.
The purpose of the Commission’s Results Orientated Moni­ toring — which assesses projects following five criteria: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability — is to support and improve the quality of selected projects, not to measure the quality of projects based on a sample. 
5.45 Namen sistema Komisije za spremljanje rezultatov projektov, s katerim se ocenjuje pet meril, in sicer: ustreznost, učinkovitost, uspešnost, vpliv in trajnost, je podpirati in izboljšati kakovost izbranih projektov, ne pa meriti kakovosti projektov na podlagi vzorca.
The operation of the ROM in the region has been fundamentally revised since the Court’s audit. 5.47. 
Delovanje sistema za spremljanje rezultatov projektov v regiji je bilo po reviziji Sodišča temeljito pregledano.
The Commission agrees that there has been a major shift to sector budget support in the ENPI. 
5.47 Komisija se strinja, da je v Evropskem instrumentu sosedstva in partnerstva prišlo do obsežnega preobrata k sektorski proračunski podpori.
Although there are certain risks inherent to budget support, this modality has the advantage to provide an overview of the whole sector and to release funds only if there are concrete results and progress in the sector. 
Čeprav so s proračunsko podporo povezana določena tveganja, pa je prednost tega načina v tem, da zagotavlja pregled nad celotnim sektorjem in sredstva sprošča samo, če so v sektorju doseženi konkretni rezultati in napredek.
Furthermore it has the advantage to engage with the Government in a continuous sector policy dialogue and is accompanied by complementary technical assistance as needed. 
Njegova prednost je tudi v tem, da sodeluje z vlado v okviru nenehnega dialoga o sektorski politiki in da ga po potrebi spremlja dopolnilna tehnična pomoč.
It has introduced a systematic assessment of their compliance with the international standards of accounting, auditing, procurement and internal control systems. 
Uvedla je sistematično ocenjevanje njihovega upoštevanja mednarodnih standardov za računovodenje, revidiranje, javno naročanje in sisteme notranje kontrole.
At the level of individual projects, the framework agreements with international organisations normally provide for verification missions. 
V okvirnih sporazumih z medna­ rodnimi organizacijami za posamezne projekte so običajno predvideni obiski zaradi preverjanja.
However, the relevant guidelines concerning on-the-spot monitoring visits are not applied effectively and the audit plan was not fully implemented. 
Vendar uporaba ustreznih smernic za obiske zaradi spremljanja na kraju samem ni uspešna, revizijski načrt pa ni bil v celoti izveden.
Also there is still a high number of open projects covering a wide range of areas, notwithstanding the efforts of the three delegations to close them. 
Poleg tega je na mnogih področjih še vedno veliko nezaključenih projektov, čeprav si vse tri delegacije prizadevajo za njihov zaključek.
5.49. Withregardtodonor’scoordinationthereisevidence that EU delegations work together with EU Member States and other donors. 
5.49 Gledeusklajevanjadonatorjevobstajajodokazi,da delegacije EU sodelujejo z državami članicami EU in drugimi donatorji.
However, administrative reform and the frequent changes of personnel and interlocutors in the recipient countries significantly diminish the efficiency of the donor coordination, notably in Ukraine. 
Vendar upravne reforme in pogoste kadrovske spre­ membe in spremembe sogovornikov v državah prejemnicah močno zmanjšujejo učinkovitost usklajevanja donatorjev, še zlasti v Ukrajini.
5.50. TheCommissionhasanalysedthepolitical,econ­ omical and social situation in the recipient countries and has reflected better the partners’ priorities in the strategic documents of the EU. 
5.50 Komisija je analizirala politični, gospodarski in socialni položaj v državah prejemnicah in poskrbela za boljše upošte­ vanje prioritet partnerjev v strateških dokumentih EU.
Nonetheless, political instability and unplanned changes in the institutional framework, staff and procedures, affect adversely the efficiency of the planned aid interventions. 
Toda politična nestabilnost in nenačrtovane spremembe institucio­ nalnega okvira, zaposlenih in postopkov negativno vplivajo na učinkovitost načrtovanih ukrepov pomoči.
The Commission has improved the definition of objectives for individual programmes, but in order to facilitate the monitoring and provide a useful feedback, more work is needed to define clear and measurable objectives and indicators, as well as of implementation milestones. 
Komisija je izboljšala opredelitev ciljev za posamezne programe, vendar bo za lažje spremljanje in zagotavljanje koristnih povratnih informacij treba vložiti več dela v opredelitev jasnih in merljivih ciljev in kazalnikov ter mejnikov pri izvajanju.
Lessons learnt are considered in the planning documents of the Commission (including the country strategy papers, the national indicative programmes and the annual action plans). 
5.51 Pridobljene izkušnje so upoštevane v dokumentih načrtovanja Komisije (vključno z nacionalnimi strateškimi dokumenti, nacionalnimi okvirnimi programi in letnimi akcij­ skimi načrti).
Experience, however, is not systematically exchanged between delegations with similar aid interventions. 
Vendar ni sistematične izmenjave izkušenj med delegacijami, odgovornimi za podobne ukrepe pomoči.
The evaluation report covering the period from 2002 to 2008 in Ukraine commissioned by the Joint Evaluation Unit was submitted only in December 2010, after the approval of the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013. 
Evalva­ cijsko poročilo za obdobje od leta 2002 do leta 2008 v Ukra­ jini, ki ga je naročila skupna enota za ocenjevanje, je bilo predloženo šele decembra 2010, po potrditvi nacionalnega okvirnega programa za obdobje 2011–2013.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 5.48. Guidelines for on-the-spot monitoring visits are not mandatory. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 5.48 Smernice za obiske na kraju samem z namenom spremljanja niso obvezne.
However the methodology for audit (including the planning of verification missions to international organisations) is a mandatory instruction, and the follow-up of the audit plan is closely followed by delegations and HQ. 
So pa obvezna navodila v zvezi z metodologijo za revizije (vključno z načrtovanjem obiskov mednarodnih organizacij zaradi preverjanja), medtem ko se nadaljnje spremljanje revizijskih načrtov skrbno spremlja na delegacijah in sedežih.
5.50. EuropeAid is planning to introduce multiannual monitoring and evaluation plans and strengthen monitoring guidance and reporting — notably in the 2011 redesign of the External Assistance Management Reports (submitted twice yearly by delegations) and the new Programme and Project Cycle Management Guidelines. 
5.50 Urad EuropeAid namerava uvesti večletne načrte spremljanja in vrednotenja ter okrepiti smernice za spremljanje in poročanje o spremljanju, zlasti s preoblikovanjem poročil o upravljanju zunanje pomoči (ki jih delegacije predložijo dvakrat letno) leta 2011 ter novimi smernicami za upravljanje programskih in projektnih ciklov.
Conclusions and recommendations of the in-country evaluation are used on a daily basis. 
5.51 Zaključki in priporočila iz ocen posameznih držav se dnevno uporabljajo.
To facilitate exchange of best practice and lessons learned, a database for project evaluations and ROM is under development as part of the Project and Programme Cycle Management (PPCM) platform. 
Za olajšanje izmenjave dobre prakse in pridobljenih izkušenj se v okviru upravljanja programskih in projektnih ciklov razvija podatkovna zbirka za ocene projektov in spremljanje rezultatov projektov.
This database will facilitate the planning, management, consultation and analysis of external project monitoring, evaluations and their results. 
Ta podatkovna zbirka bo olajšala načrtovanje, upravljanje, posvetovanje in analizo spremljanja, ocenjevanja zunanjih projektov ter njihovih rezultatov.
TheCommissionhasacceptedtherecommendations of the Court and it provided evidence of making progress in implementing them. 
Zaključki 5.52 Komisija je sprejela priporočila Sodišča in zagotovila dokaze o doseganju napredka pri njihovem izvajanju.
The EU delegation in Belarus opened in 2008, and the EU delegations in Moldova and Ukraine were reorganised to have the expertise required to conduct efficient policy dialogue, to promote civil society involvement in the policy formulation and to improve the sustainability of aid interventions. 
Delega­ cija EU v Belorusiji, ustanovljena leta 2008, ter delegaciji EU v Moldaviji in Ukrajini so bile reorganizirane, da so pridobile strokovno znanje, potrebno za učinkovit politični dialog, spod­ bujanje vključenosti civilne družbe v oblikovanje politike in izboljšanje trajnosti ukrepov pomoči.
The EU delegations promoted the cooperation between Member States, EU agencies and the other donors in a particularly unstable political and administrative environment. 
Delegacije EU so spod­ bujale sodelovanje med državami članicami, agencijami EU in drugimi donatorji, zlasti v nestabilnih političnih in upravnih razmerah.
There is no action plan to monitor and coordinate the efforts of the three delegations to implement the recommendations and promote the systematic exchange of experience. 
Ni akcijskega načrta za spremljanje in usklajevanje prizadevanj treh delegacij pri izvajanju priporočil in spodbujanju sistema­ tične izmenjave izkušenj.
A full evaluation of the progress made to focus on effective prosecution and on systematic information sharing between law enforcement bodies is pending. 
Celovita ocena napredka, doseženega pri osredotočanju na uspešen pregon in sistematično izme­ njavo informacij med organi kazenskega pregona, se šele pripravlja.
There is still considerable scope for integrating in the planning documents proper performance indicators and strategic objectives that would allow an efficient impact assessment of aid interventions. 
Obstaja še precej možnosti za vključevanje ustreznih kazalnikov uspešnosti in strateških ciljev, ki bi omogočali učin­ kovito oceno učinka ukrepov pomoči, v dokumente za načr­ tovanje.
Also, the decisive shift towards sector budget support as the predominant aid modality involves considerable risks given the adverse current financial and administrative situation. 
Poleg tega je z odločilnim premikom proti vzposta­ vitvi sektorske proračunske podpore kot prevladujočega načina pomoči zaradi sedanjega negativnega finančnega in upravnega položaja povezano precejšnje tveganje.
No other donors have to date adopted grant budget support to these countries although some development partners give budget support through loans. 
Zaenkrat se še noben drug donator ni odločil za zagotavljanje proračunske podpore tem državam, čeprav nekateri razvojni partnerji zagotavljajo to obliko pomoči s posojili.
FOLLOW-UP OF SPECIAL REPORT No 10/2008 ON EC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE TO HEALTH SERVICES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Introduction 5.54. 
SPREMLJANJE POPRAVNIH UČINKOV POSEB­ NEGA POROČILA št.10/2008 – RAZVOJNA POMOČ ES ZA ZDRAVSTVENE STORITVE V PODSAHARSKI AFRIKI Uvod 5.54 Računsko sodišče je leta 2009 objavilo posebno poro­ čilo št.
In2009,theCourtofAuditorspublishedSpecial Report (SR) No10/2008 concerning EC Development Assistance to Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa. 
10/2008 o razvojni pomoči ES za zdravstvene storitve v Podsaharski Afriki.
The audit examined whether the financial and human resources actually allocated to the health sector reflected EC’s strong policy commitments in this area. 
Revizija je preverila, ali so finančni in kadrovski viri, ki so bili dodeljeni zdravstvenemu sektorju, odražali resne politične zaveze ES na tem področju.
The audit also assessed how effectively the Commission had used the various instruments available to it for assisting the health sector, notably general and sector budget support, projects and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund). 
Ocenila je tudi, kako uspešno je Komisija uporabljala različne instru­ mente, ki jih je imela za pomoč zdravstvenemu sektorju, zlasti splošno in sektorsko proračunsko podporo, projekte in svetovni sklad za boj proti aidsu, tuberkulozi in malariji (svetovni sklad).
InSRNo10/2008theCourtmadeanumberof recommendations to the Commission. Some of them concerned the allocation and prioritisation of resources. 
Nekatera od njih se nanašajo na dodelje­ vanje sredstev in določanje prioritet za njihovo dodeljevanje.