natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ANNEX II LIVESTOCK AND MEAT PRODUCTION IN EU (1995–2010) EU - 27 Livestock numbers, 1995-2010 (1 000 000 heads) 28 13 26 24 22 20 10 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 120 100 80 60 40 20 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 EU - 27 Livestock numbers, 1995-2010 (1 000 000 heads) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Sheep Goats Sheep & Goat Meat Production 1995-2010 in EU (in 1000 of CWT1) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 7 600 7 400 7 200 7 000 6 800 6 600 6 400 6 200 6 000 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 Dairy cow Suckler cow Bovine Meat Production 1995-2010 in EU (in 1 000 of CWT1) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Adult cattle Calves and young cattle 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Eurostat. 
11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP PRILOGA II ŽIVINOREJA IN PRIREJA MESA V EU (1995–2010) 7 600 7 400 7 200 7 000 6 800 6 600 6 400 6 200 6 000 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 Število glav živine v EU-27, 1995–2010 (1 000 000 glav) Število glav živine v EU-27, 1995–2010 (1 000 000 glav) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ovce koze Prireja ovčjega in kozjega mesa v EU, 1995–2010 (1 000 CWT1) 28 13 26 24 22 20 10 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 120 100 80 60 40 20 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 krave molznice krave dojilje Prireja govejega mesa v EU, 1995–2010 (1 000 CWT1) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 odraslo govedo teleta in mlado govedo 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ovce koze 1 CWT = Ekvivalent mase klavnega trupa v tonah.
Note: Until 2004, data concerning meat production refer to the EU-15. 
Opomba: Do leta 2004 se podatki glede prireje mesa nanašajo na EU‐15.
Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 12 11 44 Adulte cattle Dairy Cow Calves and young cattle Sheep Suckler Cow Sheep Goats Goats Sheep Goats 
Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP 12 11 44 Odraslo govedo Krave molznice Teleta in mlado govedo Ovce Krave dojilje Ovce Koze Koze
180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Source: Eurostat (FSS). EU-15 EU-12 EU-27 45 ANNEX III AVERAGE NUMBER OF ANIMALS PER FARM Suckler cows Sheep Goats 2000 2003 2005 2007 2000 2003 2005 2007 2000 2003 2005 2007 Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 EU-15 EU-12 EU-27 45 PRILOGA III POVPREČNO ŠTEVILO ŽIVALI NA KMETIJO Krave dojilje Ovce Koze 2000 2003 2005 2007 2000 2003 2005 2007 2000 2003 2005 2007 Vir: Eurostat (raziskovanje strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev).
46 SUMMARY IV. 
46 POVZETEK IV.
Despite the fact that payments are granted across the whole territory of the Member State, they are actually concentrated in the regions where those types of farming are predominant, and implicitly targeted to regions without viable economic alternative. 
Čeprav odobrena plačila zajemajo celotno ozemlje države članice, so dejansko osredotočena v regijah, v katerih prevladujejo navedene vrste kmetijstva, pri čemer so implicitno usmerjena k regijam, v katerih ni izvedljive druge gospodarske možnosti.
V. Several analyses or evaluations show the relevance of coupled payments and the need to maintain them in the suckler cow and sheep and goat sectors. 
V. Več analiz ali ocen dokazuje pomembnost vezanih plačil ter potrebo po njihovi ohranitvi v sektorjih krav dojilj, ovc in koz.
In particular: — Recent impact assessments1 indicate the economic need to maintain coupled support in certain sectors and for certain regions of Europe. 
Pri tem je treba zlasti upoštevati naslednje: — najnovejše ocene učinka1 so pokazale gospodarsko potrebo po ohranitvi vezane podpore v nekaterih sektorjih in za nekatere regije v Evropi.
In particular, the analysis compare the margin over operating costs with and without coupled payments and look at the particular Member States, types of production systems and types of areas (LFA, mountain LFA, non-LFA) to assess the impacts. — Synthesis of the evaluations analysing environmental impacts of CAP measures applied in different sectors2 indicates a positive environmental effect of some of the coupled measures, in particular the suckler cow premium which, among other positive impacts, helped to maintain extensive farming and to avoid intensification in some regions. — The evaluation of direct aids in the beef and veal sector3 recommended maintaining of some type of coupled aid in sensitive regions, in particular for suckler cows as it helps maintaining the suckler cow’s herd and it could slow down employment decline in the breeding activity in sensitive regions. — Similarly, the evaluation of CAP measures for the sheep and goat sector4 recommends specific production-linked support to the sheep and goat production in order to maintain farming in specific vulnerable regions. 
V analizi se z namenom ocene učinkov zlasti primerja marža glede na stroške poslovanja z vezanimi plačili in brez njih, pri čemer se osredotoča na določene države članice, vrste sistemov reje in vrste območij (območja z omejenimi možnostmi, gorska območja z omejenimi možnostmi, območja, ki nimajo omejenih možnosti), — zbirno poročilo o ocenah, s katerimi so bili analizirani učinki ukrepov SKP, uporabljenih v različnih sektorjih, na okolje2, je pokazalo pozitiven učinek nekaterih vezanih ukrepov na okolje, zlasti premije za krave dojilje, ki je med drugimi pozitivnimi učinki pripomogla k ohranjanju ekstenzivnega kmetijstva in preprečevanju intenzifikacije v nekaterih regijah, — glede na oceno neposredne pomoči v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa3 je priporočljivo, da se v občutljivih regijah ohranijo nekatere vrste vezane pomoči, zlasti za krave dojilje, saj prispevajo k ohranjanju črede krav dojilj in lahko v občutljivih regijah upočasnijo upadanje zaposlenosti na področju reje, — podobno se na podlagi ocene ukrepov SKP za sektor ovc in koz4 priporoča posebna, z vzrejo povezana podpora za vzrejo ovc in koz, da bi se ohranilo kmetijstvo v posebnih občutljivih regijah.
1 See Note 3 of Annex C of the health check impact assessment (SEC(2008) 1885 of 20 May 2008) and Annex 3E of the CAP post 2013 impact assessment (SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 of 20 October 2011). 
1 Glej opombo 3 Priloge C k oceni učinka sistematskega pregleda SKP (SEC(2008) 1885 z dne 20. maja 2008) in Prilogo 3E k oceni učinka SKP po letu 2013 (SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 z dne 20. oktobra 2011).
The assessment of the impacts of CAP support in general and the schemes for beef and sheep and goat sectors is done on a regular basis by the Commission. 
Komisija redno ocenjuje splošne učinke podpore SKP ter učinke shem za sektorja govejega mesa ter ovc in koz.
In terms of income and employment (social impact), the abovementioned evaluations and analyses give good indication on the fact the income of those livestock sectors depend strongly on the coupled aids and that environmentally, the decoupling of coupled aid would certainly lead either to intensification of herds or to abandonment of breeding activities, which in sensitive regions will result in loss of employment and even to abandonment of agricultural production. 
Z vidika dohodka in zaposlitve (socialni učinek) zgoraj navedene ocene in analize jasno dokazujejo, da je dohodek zadevnih živinorejskih sektorjev v veliki meri odvisen od vezane pomoči in da bi z okoljskega vidika nevezana pomoč gotovo povzročila krepitev čred ali opustitev dejavnosti vzreje, zaradi česar bi v občutljivih regijah prišlo do izgub zaposlitve in celo do opustitve kmetijske proizvodnje.
While the abovementioned evaluations and analyses are focused on examining the impacts of direct aids, the other intervening measures (such as agri-environmental payments or LFA payments) are also taken into account in these evaluations. 
Medtem ko se navedene ocene in analize osredotočajo na preučevanje učinkov neposredne pomoči, se pri teh ocenah upoštevajo tudi drugi intervencijski ukrepi (kot so kmetijsko-okoljska plačila ali plačila za območja z omejenimi možnostmi).
In addition, relevant provisions in the applicable legislation aim either at ensuring the compliance with the budgetary ceilings fixed by the Commission for the audited schemes5, following the implementation of the schemes by the Member States6, or monitoring the controls carried out by the Member States under the IACS rules7. 
Poleg tega je cilj zadevnih določb veljavne zakonodaje zagotavljanje skladnosti s proračunskimi zgornjimi mejami, ki jih je Komisija določila za revidirani shemi5, spremljanje izvajanja shem s strani držav članic6 ali spremljanje kontrol, ki jih države članice izvajajo na podlagi pravil IAKS7.
VII. (a) Within the framework of the reform of the CAP towards 2020, the Commission has proposed8 that Member States may grant coupled support to sectors or regions under certain specific conditions. 
VII. (a) Komisija je v okviru reforme SKP proti letu 2020 predla-gala8, da lahko države članice sektorjem ali regijam pod posebnimi pogoji odobrijo vezano podporo.
The Commission will specify how the requirement shall be implemented. 
Komisija bo določila, kako se bo zahteva izvajala.
5 Article 64(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
5 Člen 64(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
6 See communications under Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004. 
6 Glej sporočila iz člena 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004.
7 Notifications referred to in Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. 
7 Obveščanje iz člena 76 Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004.
8 Article 38 of the proposal on direct payments (COM (2011) 625 final/2 of 19 October 2011). 
8 Člen 38 predloga o neposrednih plačilih (COM(2011) 625 final/2 z dne 19. oktobra 2011).
47 VII. (b) The legislator has considered that these concepts could be better defined at national level. 
47 VII. (b) Zakonodajalec meni, da je te pojme mogoče bolje opredeliti na nacionalni ravni.
The identification of the types of farming to be targeted is left to the Member States to take into account the real situation of the concerned sector or region on their territory. 
Opredelitev vrst kmetijstva, na katere bo osredotočena podpora, je prepuščena državam članicam, ki pri tem upoštevajo dejanske razmere v zadevnem sektorju ali regiji na svojem ozemlju.
Nevertheless, within the framework of the reform of the CAP towards 20209, the Commission will be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the conditions for granting voluntary coupled support as well as the rules on consistency with other Union measures and on the accumulation of support. 
Kljub temu bo Komisija v okviru reforme SKP proti letu 20209 pooblaščena za sprejetje delegiranih aktov v zvezi s pogoji za odobritev prostovoljne vezane podpore ter v zvezi s pravili o skladnosti z drugimi ukrepi Unije in o kopičenju podpore.
VII. (c) The Commission has an overall view of the situation across the EU regarding the various coupled support measures applied in the animal sectors. 
VII. (c) Komisija ima splošen pregled nad razmerami v EU v zvezi z različnimi ukrepi vezane podpore, ki se uporabljajo v živinorejskih sektorjih.
Member States are subject to the obligation to periodically notify the Commission with the number of animals and the amounts paid under both coupled suckler cow and sheep and goat payments10 and coupled Article 68 payments11 as well as under complementary national direct payments (CNDP) implemented in the Member States who joined in 2004 and 2007. 
Države članice morajo Komisijo redno obveščati o številu živali in zneskih, plačanih v okviru vezanih plačil za krave dojilje, ovce in koze10 ter vezanih plačil iz člena 6811, pa tudi v okviru dopolnilnih nacionalnih neposrednih plačil, ki se izvajajo v državah članicah, ki so k EU pristopile v letih 2004 in 2007.
As far as social, economic and environmental impacts of the schemes, the Commission considers that it is more a matter for evaluation than monitoring. 
Kar zadeva socialne, gospodarske in okoljske učinke shem, Komisija meni, da je ocenjevanje ustreznejše od spremljanja.
When it comes to the decision-making process for the upcoming reform, the Commission bases its proposals on an impact assessment which draws on a whole range of information sources, quantitative analyses, qualitative and quantitative information from the literature and public consultations12. 
V postopku odločanja v zvezi s prihodnjo reformo se Komisija pri svojih predlogih opira na oceno učinka, ki temelji na številnih različnih virih informacij, kvantitativnih analizah, kvalitativnih in kvantitativnih informacijah iz literature ter javnih posvetovanjih12.
Evaluation reports are one of these information sources. 
Eden od teh virov informacij so ocenjevalna poročila.
As for the future, the Commission proposal for the CAP towards 2020 foresees the establishment of a common monitoring and evaluation framework with a view to measuring the performance of the common agricultural policy, including first and second pillar measures. 
Kar zadeva prihodnost, predlog Komisije za SKP proti letu 2020 določa vzpostavitev skupnega okvira za spremljanje in ocenjevanje, da bi se meril uspeh skupne kmetijske politike, vključno z ukrepi prvega in drugega stebra.
9 Article 38 of the proposal on direct payments (COM(2011) 625 final/2 of 19 October 2011). 
9 Člen 38 predloga o neposrednih plačilih (COM(2011) 625 final/2 z dne 19. oktobra 2011).
10 Commission Regulation 1121/2009, Article 4. 
10 Člen 4 Uredbe Komisije št. 1121/2009.
11 Commission Regulation 1120/2009, Articles 51 (3) c. 
11 Člen 51(3)(c) Uredbe Komisije št. 1120/2009.
12 SeeSection1.3oftheimpactassessmentofthecommonagricultural policy towards 2020, SEC (2011) 1153 final/2 of 20 October 2011. 
12 Glejtočko1.3oceneučinkaskupnekmetijskepolitikeprotiletu2020, SEC(2011) 1153 final/2 z dne 20. oktobra 2011.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION VII. (d) The Commission regularly undertakes evaluations of all support schemes applied under the CAP. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE VII. (d) Komisija redno ocenjuje vse sheme podpor v okviru SKP.
This was also the case for the direct payments applied to the beef and veal sector and sheep and goat sectors. 
Enako je ravnala v primeru neposrednih plačil, ki so se uporabljala v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa ter v sektorjih ovc in koz.
The elements studied by the retrospective evaluations depend on the policy objectives set by the legislator. 
Elementi, ki se preučujejo v retrospek-tivnih ocenah, so odvisni od ciljev politike, ki jih določi zakonodajalec.
Also, the Commission proposal for the CAP towards 2020 foresees a framework for monitoring and evaluation, in cooperation with Member States. 
Poleg tega predlog Komisije za SKP proti letu 2020 določa okvir spremljanja in ocenjevanja v sodelovanju z državami članicami.
In the case of suckler cows, the ‘basic’ premium is 100 % EU funded and the national additional premium is nationally funded or co-financed by EAGF under certain conditions, while both basic and supplementary sheep and goats premiums are 100 % EU funded. 
V primeru krav dojilj „osnovno“ premijo v celoti financira EU, nacionalna dodatna premija pa je financirana na nacionalni ravni ali jo pod določenimi pogoji sofinancira EKJS, medtem ko osnovno in dodatno premijo za ovce in koze v celoti financira EU.
8 and Box 2 - Joint reply The two measures referred to by the Court are different in nature. 
8 in okvir 2 – skupni odgovor Ukrepa, ki ju navaja Sodišče, sta različnega značaja.
Indeed, Article 63 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 is not a permanent direct support measure like Article 68 of the same regulation as it is a one-off decision to be taken by the Member State when integrating the related amounts into the single payment scheme in view of transferring certain amounts from a sector to another. 
Člen 63 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 dejansko ni ukrep stalne neposredne podpore kot člen 68 iste uredbe, ker gre za enkratno odločitev, ki jo država članica sprejme pri vključevanju s tem povezanih zneskov v shemo enotnega plačila, da bi se določeni zneski prenesli iz enega sektorja v drugega.
Furthermore, under Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, within the 10 % limit referred to in the Court’s observations, Member States are allowed to only use up to 3.5 % of their national ceiling for financing coupled support, in particular in the two sectors at stake. 
V skladu s členom 68 Uredbe (ES) št.
Following a wide public consultation and a thorough impact assessment, the Commission adopted proposals for the CAP towards 202013, which in its Title IV, Chapter 1 foresees the possibility to grant voluntary coupled support. 
Po obsežnem javnem posvetovanju in podrobni oceni učinka je Komisija sprejela predlog za SKP proti letu 202013, ki v poglavju 1 naslova IV določa možnost za odobritev prostovoljne vezane podpore.
The ultimate decision to grant coupled support such as the audited schemes depends on the decision of the Member States, which are free to select one or several particular sectors among the eligible sectors/productions and to design the schemes they want to implement. 
Dokončna odločitev o odobritvi vezane podpore, kot sta revidirani shemi, je odvisna od odločitve držav članic, ki lahko med upravičenimi sek-torji/rejami same izberejo en določen sektor ali več in oblikujejo sheme, ki jih želijo izvajati.
According to the proposal14, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the conditions for granting this voluntary coupled support as well as the rules on consistency with other Union measures and on the accumulation of support. 
V skladu s predlogom14 je Komisija pooblaščena za sprejetje delegiranih aktov v zvezi s pogoji za odobritev te prostovoljne vezane podpore ter v zvezi s pravili o skladnosti z drugimi ukrepi Unije in o kopičenju podpore.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 16. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 16.
Commission agrees that targeting is implicit in the nature of the schemes. 
Komisija se strinja, da so sredstva usmerjena že zaradi same narave shem.
The main objective of the coupled aid to suckler cow and sheep and goat premium is to maintain a minimum level of production in those sectors and/or regions facing difficulties. 
Glavni cilj vezane pomoči za premije za krave dojilje, ovce in koze je ohranjanje minimalne ravni reje v sektorjih in/ali regijah, ki se soočajo s težavami.
The premiums are thus targeted to those types of breeders and it is possible that a more intensive breeding farm is supported with one of those coupled aids, support which does not go against the objective of the premium. 
Premije so zato usmerjene k takim vrstam rejcev, pri čemer je mogoče, da se kmetija z intenzivnejšo vzrejo subvencionira z eno od navedenih vrst vezane pomoči, ki ne nasprotuje cilju premije.
However by nature, due to the traditional localisation of such production, this risk is minimum. 
Vendar je to tveganje zaradi tradicionalne lokalizacije take reje po naravi minimalno.
18 to 21. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke 18 do 21.
Joint reply Within a more general decoupling trend, partially coupled support was deemed necessary in some specific cases where a minimum level of agricultural production is important to sustain the economic activity e.g. in regions with few economic alternatives. 
V okviru splošnejšega trenda nevezane pomoči se je delno vezana podpora štela za nujno v nekaterih posebnih primerih, v katerih je minimalna raven kmetijske proizvodnje pomembna za ohranitev gospodarske dejavnosti, npr. v regijah, kjer ni veliko drugih gospodarskih možnosti.
However, maintaining such coupled payments entails administrative costs for Member States authorities. 
Vendar imajo organi držav članic zaradi ohranjanja takih vezanih plačil upravne stroške.
As a consequence some Member States have chosen to integrate these coupled schemes into the SPS as they considered that the level of coupled payment allowed (50 %) was not sufficient to justify keeping two management and control systems in parallel. 
Zato so se nekatere države članice odločile, da bodo te vezane sheme vključile v SEP, ker so menile, da dovoljena stopnja vezanih plačil (50 %) ni upravičevala vzporednega izvajanja dveh upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov.
49 Box 3 The goat premium was integrated into the SPS as France, Spain and Greece considered that the limited level of coupled payment allowed (50 %) was not a sufficient incentive for to keeping two administrative management and control systems in parallel at Member State level. 
49 Okvir 3 Premija za koze je bila vključena v SEP, ker so Francija, Španija in Grčija menile, da dovoljena omejena stopnja vezanih plačil (50 %) ni bila zadostna spodbuda za vzporedno izvajanje dveh upravnih upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov na ravni države članice.
The same reasoning applies to the ewe premium as the maximum level of coupled support is the same in both cases, i.e. up to 50 % according to Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
Enaka utemeljitev velja za premijo za ovce, ker je najvišja stopnja vezane podpore v obeh primerih enaka, tj. do 50 % v skladu s členom 67 Uredbe (ES) št.
See joint reply to paragraphs 18 to 21. 
Glej skupni odgovor na odstavke 18 do 21.
The evaluation of direct aids in the beef and veal sector15 recommended maintaining some types of coupled aid in sensitive regions, in particular for suckler cows as it helps in maintaining the suckler cow’s herd and it could slow down employment decline in the breeding activity in sensitive regions. 25 to 27. 
Glede na oceno neposredne pomoči v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa15 je priporočljivo, da se v občutljivih regijah ohranijo nekatere vrste vezane pomoči, zlasti za krave dojilje, saj prispevajo k ohranjanju črede krav dojilj in lahko v občutljivih regijah upočasnijo upadanje zaposlenosti na področju reje.
Joint reply Although there is a general tendency to decrease livestock herds in the EU the situation is rather complex. 
25 do 27. – skupni odgovor Čeprav je v EU prisoten splošen trend zmanjševanja čred živine, so razmere precej zapletene.
For sheep/goats the herd declined in most Member States but not in Greece, Romania, Finland and Denmark. 
Črede ovc/koz so se zmanjšale v večini držav članic, vendar ne v Grčiji, Romuniji, na Finskem in Danskem.
For bovine production the picture is more balanced with lower decline rates than in the dairy herd. 
Razmere na področju vzreje goveda so bolj uravnotežene, pri čemer so stopnje zmanjševanja nižje kot v čredah krav molznic.
As for the suckler herd, it was rather stable in Spain, France and Portugal during the revised period. 
Kar zadeva črede krav dojilj, so bile v obravnavanem obdobju v Španiji, Franciji in na Portugalskem razmeroma stabilne.
In contrast, many of the small producing Member States, especially in central and eastern Europe, reported declines in net beef production. 
Nasprotno pa je veliko majhnih držav članic proizvajalk, zlasti iz Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope, poročalo o zmanjševanju neto proizvodnje govejega mesa.