natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By way of illustrating our specific findings, our auditors found that the actual legal definition of allowances should be better clarified and that procedures to open ETS accounts on the EU registry and to monitor transactions were inadequate to provide sufficient controls against abuse. 
Za ponazoritev naših posebnih ugotovitev naj omenimo, da so naši revizorji ugotovili, da bi morala biti dejanska pravna opredelitev pravic bolje pojasnjena ter da postopki za odprtje računov ETS v registru EU in spremljanje transakcij niso bili primerni, da bi bilo zagotovljenih dovolj kontrol, ki bi preprečevale zlorabe.
This was a ‘catch-22’ situation — Member States could not monitor cross-border transactions effectively because they did not have direct access to the central database, but the Commission could not monitor them either because it had no regulatory basis to do so. 
Tako je prišlo do položaja brez izhoda: države članice niso mogle uspešno spremljati čezmejnih transakcij, ker niso imele neposrednega dostopa do osrednje podatkovne zbirke, Komisija pa jih ni mogla spremljati, ker za to ni imela pravne podlage.
Our auditors also found that the systems for monitoring and reporting emissions were not harmonised and showed control weaknesses, as well as inadequate guidance by the Commission and reporting by both Commission and the Member States. 
Revizorji so tudi ugotovili, da sistemi za spremljanje emisij in poročanje o njih niso bili usklajeni in so kazali slabosti pri kontrolah ter da so bili smernice Komisije in poročanje Komisije in držav članic neustrezni.
As a result of our findings, we concluded that the framework for protecting market integrity was not sufficiently robust and that there were significant implementation weaknesses in the previous phase, some of which also require further action in the current phase. 
Na podlagi svojih ugotovitev smo zaključili, da okvir za zaščito celovitosti trga ni bil dovolj trden in da so obstajale bistvene slabosti pri izvajanju prejšnje faze.
Despite the above problems, our report makes clear that this innovative scheme has been continually improved. 
Kljub omenjenim problemom je v našem poročilu jasno navedeno, da se je ta inovativni sistem stalno izboljševal.
The debate and reforms about the ETS, which were ongoing at the time when the report was published, focus on its effectiveness and on how to deal with the surplus. 
Razprava o ETS in reforme na njegovem področju, ki so v času objave poročila še potekale, so bile osredotočene na uspešnost sistema in na to, kako ukrepati v zvezi s presežnimi pravicami.
This audit did not address these issues. 
Ta revizija teh vprašanj ni obravnavala.
But with this report we show that attention also has to be given to basic questions of market integrity and implementation, so that the EU can be confident that this flagship policy is better equipped to deliver on emission reductions and low carbon technologies. 
Toda s poročilom smo pokazali, da je treba pozornost nameniti tudi temeljnim vprašanjem celovitosti trga in izvajanja, da bo EU lahko prepričana, da je ta pa-radna politika primernejša za doseganje zmanjšanja emisij in uvedbo nizkoogljičnih tehnologij.
We made a number of practical recommendations to both the Commission and Member State authorities, which can help them improve market integrity and implementation of the system, making it a stronger tool for achieving climate change targets by 2020 and beyond. 
Dali smo več praktičnih priporočil, ki lahko Komisiji in organom držav članic pomagajo izboljšati celovitost trga in izvajanje sistema, da bo sistem postal boljše orodje za doseganje ciljev na področju podnebnih sprememb do leta 2020 in pozneje.
In response to our report, the Commission agreed that any significant remaining issues in emission market regulation and oversight should be addressed in order to improve market integrity where necessary, with reassurance that many improvements are already in place for phase III (2013-2020) and specifically address our observations. 
V odgovor na naše poročilo se je Komisija strinjala, da bi bilo treba obravnavati vsa še preostala bistvena vprašanja glede ureditve in nadzora trga emisij, da se izboljša celovitost trga, kadar je to potrebno. Ponovno je tudi zagotovila, da se številne izboljšave za III. fazo (2013–2020) že izvajajo in da so povezane s posameznimi našimi opažanji.
The report generated significant interest from the media and was presented at a press briefing to EU-accredited journalists in Brussels. 
Poročilo je vzbudilo precejšnje zanimanje medijev in je bilo predstavljeno v Bruslju na tiskovni konferenci za akreditirane novinarje v EU.
The media in the EU and across the world reported that the EU ETS requires more oversight to improve the carbon market and more protection from market abuse, including risks of VAT-fraud which were still ongoing. 
Mediji v EU in drugod po svetu so poročali, da EU ETS potrebuje več pregleda zaradi izboljšanja trga ogljika in več zaščite pred zlorabo trga, vključno s tveganji goljufij na področju DDV, do katerih še vedno prihaja.
As is the case for all our special reports, the Member responsible for the report, Kevin Cardiff, presented it to the European Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control, and also to the environment committees of the Parliament and the Council, in order to share insights which can be used in future decisions on the relevant rules and regulations. 
Kot je navada pri naših posebnih poročilih, je tudi tega član Sodišča Kevin Cardiff, ki je bil zanj pristojen, predstavil Odboru Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor, nato pa še odboroma Parlamenta in Sveta za okolje zaradi izmenjave spoznanj, ki bi se lahko uporabila pri prihodnjih odločitvah v zvezi z ustreznimi predpisi.
The Parliament and the Council welcomed our observations and recommendations and will consider any future proposals for possible improvements to the integrity and implementation of the scheme. 
Parlament in Svet sta se strinjala z našimi opažanji in priporočili in bosta preučila vse prihodnje predloge glede možnosti za izboljšanje celovitosti in izvajanja sistema.
Audit team (left to right): Stefan Den Engelsen, Emese Fésűs, Kevin Cardiff, Colm Friel. 
Revizijska ekipa (od leve proti desni): Stefan Den Engelsen, Emese Fésűs, Kevin Cardiff, Colm Friel.
Our activities 24 • Are the Fisheries Partnership Agreements well managed by the Commission? 
Naše dejavnosti 24 • Ali Komisija dobro upravlja sporazume o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju?
(11/2015) - evaluated whether the agreements are well managed. 
(11/2015) – V poročilu je ocenjeno, ali se sporazumi dobro upravljajo.
The audit assessed the negotiation and the implementation of the agreements, the Commission’s monitoring of catches and the selection and control of the actions funded. 
Pri reviziji so bila ocenjena pogajanja o sporazumih in njihovo izvajanje, spremljanje ulova, ki ga opravlja Komisija, ter izbira in nadzor financiranih ukrepov.
The audit found that although the agreements were generally well managed, the tonnage negotiated was often higher than the catches reported from previous periods. This leads to regular under-use. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bilo upravljanje sporazumov sicer na splošno dobro, vendar je bila izpoga-jana tonaža pogosto večja od ulova, sporočenega v prejšnjih obdobjih, zaradi česar so bile ribolovne možnosti redno premalo izkoriščene.
Because the EU pays in full regardless of the amount of fishing actually done, the real cost paid was frequently higher than the price negotiated. 
Ker EU svoj prispevek plača v celoti ne glede na dejanski ulov, so bili dejansko plačani stroški pogosto višji od izpogajane cene.
There was also a lack of reliable, consistent and complete data on actual fish catches made by the EU fleet. 
Primanjkovalo je zanesljivih, doslednih in popolnih podatkov o tem, koliko rib je flota EU dejansko ulovila.
The Commission should consider previous levels of use when negotiating new arrangements, link payments more closely to actual catches and ensure that the new catch database is fully used by flag Member States and provides reliable catch data which can be monitored and kept up to date. 
Komisija bi morala pri pogajanjih o novih ureditvah upoštevati prejšnje stopnje uporabe, bolje povezati plačila in dejanski ulov ter zagotoviti, da države članice zastave v celoti izkoristijo novo podatkovno zbirko s podatki o ulovu in da ta zagotavlja zanesljive podatke o ulovu, ki jih bo mogoče spremljati in redno posodabljati.
The agreements are supposed to ensure the sustainability of the fisheries concerned by allowing the EU vessels to fish only the surplus resources of partner countries. 
Sporazumi naj bi zagotovili trajnost ribištva, saj naj bi plovilom EU omogočali samo ribolov presežnih virov partnerskih držav.
But the audit doubted that the so-called surplus can be calculated in a reliable manner, due to the lack of reliable information. • The EU priority of promoting a knowledge-based rural economy has been affected by poor management of knowledge-transfer and advisory measures (12/2015) - focused on whether there are management and control systems in place to deliver rural development knowledge-transfer and advisory measures effectively. 
Toda revizorji so dvomili, da je tako imenovane presežke mogoče zanesljivo izračunati, saj ni dovolj zanesljivih informacij. • Na prioriteto EU, da spodbuja na znanju temelječe podeželsko gospodarstvo, vpliva slabo upravljanje ukrepov prenosa znanja in svetovanja (12/2015) – Poročilo se osredotoča na vprašanje, ali obstajajo sistemi upravljanja in nadzora za uspešno izvajanje ukrepov prenosa znanja in svetovanja na področju razvoja podeželja.
The audit found that EU-funded vocational training and advice programmes in rural areas cost too much to run, often duplicate existing programmes and favour established training providers. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da so programi poklicnega usposabljanja in svetovanja na podeželskih območjih, ki jih financira EU, predragi, pogosto podvajajo obstoječe programe in dajejo prednost uveljavljenim izvajalcem.
The audit identified poor management procedures by the Member States and insufficient supervision by the Commission. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so postopki upravljanja v državah članicah slabi, nadzor Komisije pa ni zadosten.
Member States relied too much on trainers’ proposals and considered any type of training as ‘good’ and eligible for public funding. 
Države članice so se preveč zanašale na predloge izvajalcev usposabljanja, katera koli vrsta usposabljanja pa je štela kot dobra in upravičena do prejemanja javnih sredstev.
A lack of fair and transparent selection meant long-standing and well-established providers were recurrently selected and received most of the funding. 
Zaradi pomanjkanja poštenih in preglednih izbirnih postopkov so bili vedno znova izbrani dolgoletni in dobro uveljavljeni izvajalci, ki so tudi prejeli večino sredstev.
Member States should select training activities that respond to skills needs identified through a recurrent analysis, and should avoid the risk of the selection process becoming provider driven. 
Države članice bi morale izbrati dejavnosti usposabljanja, ki ustrezajo potrebam, ugotovljenim s ponavljajočo se analizo, in se izogibati tveganju, da bi izbirni postopek postal prilagojen izvajalcem.
The EU supports rural training and advice projects through the EAFRD. 
EU podpira projekte usposabljanja in svetovanja na podeželju v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja.
For the 2007-2013 period, €1.3 billion was set aside for these activities. 
Za obdobje 2007–2013 je bilo za te dejavnosti namenjenih 1,3 milijarde EUR.
Member States’ co-financing brought total public support to €2.2 billion. 
Skupaj s sofinanciranjem držav članic je skupna javna podpora znašala 2,2 milijarde EUR.
For 2014-2020, the amount may exceed €4 billion. 
Za obdobje 2014–2020 bi znesek lahko presegel 4 milijarde EUR.
Our activities 25 • The cost-effectiveness of EU Rural Development support for non-productive investments in agriculture (20/2015) - focused on the cost-effectiveness of non-productive investments (NPIs) in contributing to the EAFRD objective of sustainable use of agricultural land in the 2007-2013 programming period. 
Naše dejavnosti 25 • Stroškovna učinkovitost podpore EU za razvoj podeželja za neproduktivne naložbe v kmetijstvu (20/2015) – Poročilo se osredotoča na stroškovno učinkovitost neproduktivnih naložb pri prispevanju k doseganju cilja trajnostne rabe kmetijskih zemljišč Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja v programskem obdobju 2007–2013.
The audit concluded that NPI support did contribute to the achievement of the objectives, but not in a way that was cost-effective. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da je podpora za neproduktivne naložbe sicer prispevala k doseganju ciljev, vendar na način, ki ni bil stroškovno učinkovit.
This was because the costs of 75 % of the projects visited were unreasonably high. 
Stroški 75 % obiskanih projektov so bili namreč nerazumno visoki.
The auditors visited four Member States which between them spent 80 % of the total EU budget for NPIs — Portugal, Denmark, the United Kingdom (England) and Italy (Puglia). 
Revizorji so obiskali štiri države članice, ki so porabile 80 % vseh sredstev, namenjenih za neproduktivne naložbe, in sicer Portugalsko, Dansko, Združeno kraljestvo (Anglija) in Italijo (Apulija).
Only five of the 28 audited projects proved to be cost-effective. 
Izkazalo se je, da je bilo samo 5 od 28 revidiranih projektov stroškovno učinkovitih.
The report warns that the issue may not be confined to the sample, since the problems stemmed from weaknesses in Member States’ management and control systems. 
Poročilo opozarja, da problemi niso nujno omejeni le na vzorec, saj izhajajo iz slabosti v upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemih držav članic.
NPIs are investments which do not generate significant return, income or revenue, or increase significantly the value of the beneficiary’s holding, but have a positive environmental impact. • EU support for rural infrastructure: potential to achieve significantly greater value for money (25/2015) - examined whether the European Commission and the Member States had achieved value for money with funding through rural development programmes for infrastructure such as roads, water supply schemes, schools and other facilities. 
Neproduktivne naložbe so naložbe, ki ne ustvarjajo večjega donosa, prejemkov ali prihodkov ali ki bistveno ne povečujejo vrednosti gospodarstva upravičenca, vendar imajo pozitiven vpliv na okolje. • Podpora EU za podeželsko infrastrukturo: potencialne možnosti za doseganje bistveno večje stroškovne učinkovitosti (25/2015) – V poročilu je preučeno vprašanje, ali so Evropska komisija in države članice pri financiranju infrastrukture, kot so ceste, vodooskrbni sistemi, šole in druga infrastruktura, v okviru programov razvoja podeželja dosegle stroškovno učinkovitost.
Although some of the infrastructure projects have made a positive contribution to the rural areas, the audit found that the Member States and the Commission, acting through shared management, had achieved only limited value for money. 
Nekateri infrastrukturni projekti so sicer pozitivno vplivali na podeželska območja, vendar je bilo pri reviziji ugotovljeno, da so države članice in Komisija v okviru deljenega upravljanja dosegle le delno stroškovno učinkovitost.
Far more could be achieved with the funds available. 
S sredstvi, ki so bila na voljo, bi se lahko doseglo veliko več.
Member States did not always clearly justify the need for using EU rural development funds and focused on avoiding double funding rather than on achieving effective coordination with other funds. 
Države članice niso vedno jasno utemeljile potrebe po črpanju sredstev iz skladov EU za razvoj podeželja in so se osredotočale na preprečevanje dvojnega financiranja namesto na doseganje uspešnega usklajevanja z drugimi skladi.
The risk that projects would have gone ahead anyway without EU money was not effectively managed, although some good practices were identified. 
Tveganje, da bi se projekti izvajali tudi brez sredstev EU, se ni uspešno obvladovalo, čeprav so bili odkriti nekateri primeri dobre prakse.
Since 2012, the Commission has adopted a more proactive and coordinated approach, according to the audit. 
Po navedbah v revizijskem poročilu je pristop Komisije od leta 2012 dejavnejši in bolj usklajen.
If implemented properly, this should lead to better financial management in the 2014-2020 period. 
Če se bo ta pristop pravilno izvajal, bi to moralo privesti do boljšega finančnega poslovodenja v obdobju 2014–2020.
Between 2007 and 2013, €13 billion of EU funds was allocated to rural infrastructure through rural development programmes. 
Med letoma 2007 in 2013 je bilo za podeželsko infrastrukturo v okviru programov razvoja podeželja dodeljenih 13 milijard EUR.
National spending brought the total to almost €19 billion. 
Skupaj z nacionalno porabo je to zneslo skoraj 19 milijard EUR.
Our activities 26 100 80 60 40 20 0 Foreign policy €65 billion 6% Global Europe Global Europe covers the EU’s external relations (the ‘foreign policy’), including enlargement issues and the EU’s development assistance and humanitarian aid. 
Naše dejavnosti 26 100 80 60 40 20 0 Zunanja politika 65 milijard EUR 6% Evropa v svetu Razdelek Evropa v svetu zajema zunanje odnose EU (zunanjo politiko), vključno s širitvijo EU, ter razvojno in humanitarno pomoč EU.
The EU earmarked 6 % of the total budget, or €65 billion, for spending on these objectives in the 2014-2020 programming period. 
Porabi za te cilje je EU v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 namenila 6 % celotnega proračuna ali 65 milijard EUR.
The budget for 2015 was €7.5 billion. 
Proračun za leto 2015 je znašal 7,5 milijarde EUR.
Additional funding is provided by the EDFs, which is not part of the EU budget and therefore does not fall under the multiannual financial framework. • The EU police mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL): mixed results (7/2015) - assessed whether EUPOL was well planned and coordinated, whether it had received adequate operational support and guidance, whether it contributed to the progress of the Afghan national police and whether the phasing-out of EUPOL was adequately prepared. 
Dodatno financiranje se zagotavlja iz Evropskega razvojnega sklada, ki ni del proračuna EU in zato ne spada v večletni finančni okvir. • Policijska misija EU v Afganistanu: mešani rezultati (7/2015) – Pri reviziji je bilo ocenjeno, ali je bila policijska misija EU v Afganistanu (EUPOL) dobro načrtovana in dobro usklajena, ali je dobila ustrezno operativno podporo in usmerjanje, ali je prispevala k napredku afganistanske nacionalne policije in ali je bilo njeno postopno ukinjanje ustrezno pripravljeno.
The audit found that EUPOL had partly achieved its aim of helping to establish a sustainable and effective Afghan-owned civilian police. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je EUPOL delno dosegla svoj cilj prispevati k vzpostavitvi trajnostne in uspešne civilne policije, za katero bi bil odgovoren Afganistan.
In the absence of a trained, fully functioning Afghan police force, and with high illiteracy rates and widespread corruption in the Afghan police and justice systems, EUPOL managed to contribute to a reform of the Ministry of the Interior and the professionalisation of the country’s police. 
Kljub neobstoju usposobljene in povsem delujoče afganistanske policije, visokim stopnjam nepismenosti in močno razširjeni korupciji v afganistanskem policijskem in pravosodnem sistemu je misiji EUPOL uspelo prispevati k reformi ministrstva za notranje zadeve in profesionalizaciji državne policije.
However, the continuing systemic weaknesses in the country’s justice and police put at risk the legacy of the results achieved by EUPOL, as well as of the Afghan policing sector in general, after the phasing-out of the mission by the end of 2016. 
Vseeno pa bo nadaljnji obstoj sistemskih slabosti v pravosodju in policiji Afganistana po postopni ukinitvi misije do konca leta 2016 ogrožal zapuščino, ki je rezultat delovanja EUPOL in afganistanskega policijskega sektorja na splošno.
The total cost of EUPOL for the period from May 2007 to December 2014 was close to €400 million, with security-related costs accounting for almost one third. 
Skupni stroški misije EUPOL za obdobje od maja 2007 do decembra 2014 so znašali približno 400 milijonov EUR.
As at the end of 2014, the EU had deployed a total of 32 common security and defence policy missions, of which 16 had been completed and wound up and 16 were still ongoing. 
Skoraj tretjina tega zneska je bila namenjena stroškom za varnost. Do konca leta 2014 je EU v okviru skupne varnostne in obrambne politike v Afganistan napotila 32 misij.
Our activities 27 • EU support for the fight against torture and the abolition of the death penalty (9/2015) - assessed the effectiveness of the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights’ promotion of the prevention of torture, the rehabilitation of victims of torture and the abolition of the death penalty. 
Naše dejavnosti 27 • Podpora EU za boj proti mučenju in odpravo smrtne kazni (9/2015) – V poročilu je ocenjena uspešnost Evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice pri krepitvi preprečevanja mučenja, rehabilitacije žrtev mučenja ter odprave smrtne kazni.
The audit found that projects receiving EU support are having an impact, but too often they are not well targeted and have limited scope because funding is thinly spread. 
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da projekti, ki so prejeli podporo EU, sicer imajo učinek, vendar pomoč prepogosto ni dobro usmerjena in ima omejen obseg, ker je dodeljena v premajhnih zneskih.
While funding was generally well allocated, the Commission did not take sufficient account of the human rights priorities for each country. 
Razporejanje sredstev je bilo sicer na splošno dobro, vendar Komisija ni dovolj upoštevala prioritet na področju človekovih pravic za posamezne države.
Projects were often not well coordinated with other EU actions, such as development support and political dialogue. 
Projekti pogosto niso bili dovolj dobro usklajeni z drugimi ukrepi EU, kot sta razvojna podpora in politični dialog.
Projects were generally implemented by motivated organisations with good expertise, but their selection lacked rigour. 
Projekte so v glavnem izvajale organizacije, ki so bile motivirane in so imele dobro strokovno znanje, vendar njihova izbira ni bila dovolj dosledna.
The audit’s recommendations covered the targeting of financial resources, better coordination with other EU efforts, selection and improvement of project proposals, performance measurement and the self-sustainability of beneficiary organisations. 
Priporočila revizije so se nanašala na usmerjanje finančnih virov, boljše usklajevanje z drugimi prizadevanji EU, izbiro in izboljšanje projektnih predlogov, merjenje uspešnosti in samozadostnost organizacij upravičenk.
The European Union works through diplomatic channels and provides grants to NGOs through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights. 
Evropska unija deluje po diplomatskih poteh in zagotavlja nepovratna sredstva nevladnim organizacijam v okviru evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice.
Between 2007 and 2013, there were some 180 grants totalling over €100 million aimed at fighting torture and abolishing the death penalty. • EU support to timber-producing countries under the FLEGT action plan (13/2015) - examined whether support provided by the Commission under the EU Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) action plan to address illegal logging was well managed. 
Med letoma 2007 in 2013 je bilo sklenjenih približno 180 pogodb o nepovratnih sredstvih v skupni višini več kot 100 milijonov EUR za boj proti mučenju in odpravo smrtne kazni. • Podpora EU državam proizvajalkam lesa v okviru akcijskega načrta FLEGT (13/2015) – V poročilu je preučeno, ali je Komisija dobro upravljala podporo v okviru akcijskega načrta EU FLEGT za preprečevanje nezakonite sečnje.