natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Taking account of future disbursements the total costs of these activities can be expected to be more than one-sixth of the sums disbursed. – The Executive Agency has had a positive impact on client satisfaction. 
Ob upoštevanju prihodnjih razdelitev sredstev je moč pričakovati, da bodo skupni stroški teh dejavnosti znašali več kot šestino razdeljenih sredstev. – Izvajalska agencija je pozitivno vplivala na zadovoljstvo strank. programski predlogi, ki temeljijo na jasnem modelu politike in odražajo pričakovano povezavo med odhodki, izložkom in učinkom; spremljanje, ki presega posamezne projekte in pomaga pri oblikovanju pregleda nad programom kot celoto ter ustreza napovedanemu cilju programa; takšno vrednotenje programov, da je kar najbolj koristno kot vir ”povratnih” informacij, morda z več ”longitudinalnega” vrednotenja – pregledovanje učinka ključnih kategorij projektov v zaporednih okvirih porabe; bolj sistematično evidentiranje in analiziranje informacij o administrativnih stroških programov ob upoštevanju stroškov, ki jih krijejo upravičenci, ter uporaba teh informacij za primerjanje programov ter ugotavljanje in širjenje najboljše prakse.
The European Union uses a range of instruments to pursue its energy policy objectives1. 
Evropska unija za doseganje ciljev svoje energetske politike1 uporablja številne instrumente.
They include: – international agreements; – support for Research and Development in energy efficiency and renewable energy sources; – legislation to promote energy efficiency (such as the EU energy label); – promotion of demonstration projects; – structural funds spending on energy projects; – emissions trading. 
Med njimi so: – mednarodni sporazumi; – podpora za raziskave in razvoj na področju energetske učinkovitosti in obnovljivih virov energije; – zakonodaja za spodbujanje energetske učinkovitosti (kot je energijska oznaka EU) – spodbujanje predstavitvenih projektov; – sredstva strukturnih skladov za energetske projekte; – trgovanje z emisijami.
The Intelligent Energy for Europe Programme (IEE) seeks to complement these instruments by promoting energy efficiency, the use of renewable energy sources and energy diversification. 
Program Inteligentna energija za Evropo (IEE) si prizadeva te instrumente dopolniti s spodbujanjem energetske učinkovitosti, uporabe obnovljivih virov energije in energetske diverzifikacije.
Its aim is to create a climate in which there is wide knowledge of relevant technologies and of their importance. 
Njegov cilj je ustvariti okolje, v katerem so ustrezne tehnologije in njihova pomembnost široko znane.
Inter alia the programme promotes exchanges of experience and know how, and encourages the spread of best practices and best available technologies, thus seeking to contribute to security of energy supply, competitiveness and environmental protection. 
Program med drugim spodbuja izmenjavo izkušenj in znanja ter širjenje najboljših praks in najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij ter si tako prizadeva prispevati k zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo, konkurenčnosti in varstvu okolja.
The programme does not support directly the development of new technologies2. 
Program ne spodbuja neposrednega razvoja novih tehnologij2.
1 The EU has defined its objectives as – increasing security of supply; – ensuring the competitiveness of European economies and the availability of affordable energy; – promoting environmental sustainability and combating climate change. 
1 EU je svoje cilje opredelila kot: – povečanje zanesljivosti oskrbe; – zagotavljanje konkurenčnosti evropskih gospodarstev in razpoložljivosti cenovno dostopne energije; – spodbujanje okoljske trajnosti in boj proti podnebnim spremembam.
Presidency conclusions, Brussels, March 2007 (Council Document 7224/07). 
Sklepi predsedstva, Bruselj, marec 2007 (Dokument Sveta 7224/07).
2 Articles 1 and 2 of Decision No 1230/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 176, 15.7.2003, p. 
2 Člena 1 in 2 Odločbe št. 1230/2003/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 176, 15.7.2003, str.
BOX 1 ENERGY INTELLIGENT EDUCATION FOR RETROFITTING OF SOCIAL HOUSES EIEDUCATION  A SAVE PROJECT Objective: To give social housing companies knowledge and tools to perform energy-efficient retrofitting. 
OKVIR 1 IZOBRAŽEVANJE O INTELIGENTNI ENERGIJI ZA PRENOVO SOCIALNIH STANOVANJ IZOBRAŽEVANJE ZA EI  PROJEKT SAVE Cilj: Opremiti podjetja, ki zagotavljajo socialna stanovanja, z znanjem in orodji za energetsko učinkovito prenovo stanovanj.
Duration: 01/2006 – 12/2006 Budget: 457 291 euro (EU contribution: 50 %) The project set up an education programme and published a guidebook for social housing companies, municipalities and other housing stock owners to help them perform “energy intelligent retrofitting” – meaning saving at least 30 % energy compared to the situation before the renovation. 
Trajanje: 01/2006 – 12/2006 Proračun: 457 291 EUR (prispevek EU: 50%) V okviru projekta je bil izveden izobraževalni program in objavljena publikacija za podjetja, ki zagotavljajo socialna stanovanja, občine in druge lastnike stanovanj, kar naj bi jim pomagalo pri izvajanju ”energetsko učinkovite prenove” – to pomeni vsaj 30% prihranka energije v primerjavi s stanjem pred prenovo.
The IEE Programme for 2003-2006 had a budget of 250 million euro in commitment appropriations over the four years concerned. 
Proračun programa IEE za obdobje 2003–2006 je znašal 250 milijonov EUR odobritev za prevzem obveznosti za zadevna štiri leta.
The money was used to support nearly 450 projects, involving consortia (with, on average, between seven and eight participants) across the Union, in other members of the European Economic Area or in candidate countries. 
Denar je bil porabljen za podporo skoraj 450 projektom, pri katerih so sodelovali konzorciji (s povprečno sedmimi do osmimi udeleženci) iz vse Unije, drugih članic Evropskega gospodarskega prostora ali držav kandidatk.
Participants included local authorities, research institutes, regulators, industry associations, chambers of craftsmen, consultancies and manufacturers. 
Med udeleženci so bili lokalni organi, raziskovalni inštituti, zakonodajalci, industrijska združenja, obrtne zbornice, svetovalne družbe in proizvajalci.
More than 1 700 bodies have participated in the programme. 
V programu je sodelovalo več kot 1 700 subjektov.
Intelligent Energy for Europe 2003-2006 comprised four “vertical” sub programmes: – SAVE: energy efficiency, notably in buildings and industry3; – Altener: new and renewable energy sources3; – STEER: energy aspects of transport; – Coopener: co-operation with developing countries; and five “horizontal” activities combining several of the sub programmes mentioned above and/or relating to Community priorities. 
Inteligentno energijo za Evropo 2003–2006 so sestavljali štirje ”vertikalni” podprogrami: – SAVE: energetska učinkovitost, zlasti na področju zgradb in industrije3; – ALTENER: novi in obnovljivi viri energije3; – STEER: energetski vidiki prometa; – COOPENER: sodelovanje z državami v razvoju ter pet ”horizontalnih” dejavnosti, ki so združevale več zgoraj navedenih podprogramov in/ali so se nanašale na prednostne naloge Skupnosti.
3 SAVE and Altener date from 1993 and were previously funded through other programmes (see Special Report No 17/98 on support for renewable energy sources in the shared-cost actions of the Joule-Thermie Programme and the pilot actions of the Altener Programme (OJ C 356, 20.11.1998)). 
3 SAVE in ALTENER izvirata iz leta 1993 in sta se prej financirala prek drugih programov (glej Posebno poročilo št. 17/98 o podpori za obnovljive vire energije v ukrepih programa Joule-Thermie z deljenimi stroški in poskusnih ukrepih programa ALTENER (UL C 356, 20.11.1998)).
7 BOX 2 “GREENLODGES”  AN ALTENER PROJECT Objective: To promote and facilitate renewable and micro-CHP heat and electricity applications in remote rural hotels (lodges). 
7 OKVIR 2 ”ZELENE KOČE”  PROJEKT ALTENER Cilj: Spodbujati in olajšati uporabo obnovljivih ter toplotnih in električnih mikro naprav SPTE v odročnih podeželskih hotelih (kočah).
Duration: 01/01/2005 – 31/01/2007 Budget: 849 652 euro (EU contribution: 50 %) The project developed a guide that can be used by the owners/managers of rural hotels and similar accommodation for the implementation of renewable energy and micro co-generation systems, drawing on energy audits developed in “lodges” in different part of the EU. 
Trajanje: 01/01/2005 – 31/01/2007 Proračun: 849 652 EUR (prispevek EU: 50%) V okviru projekta je bil pripravljen priročnik, ki ga lahko lastniki/upravitelji podeželskih hotelov in podobnih namestitvenih objektov uporabljajo za uvedbo sistemov za obnovljivo energijo in mikrosoproizvodnjo, in sicer na podlagi energetskih pregledov, izvedenih v ”kočah” v različnih delih EU.
Information was also disseminated by means of regional and national workshops. 
Informacije so se razširjale tudi prek delavnic na regijski in nacionalni ravni.
The outturn for expenditure committed under the sub programmes (reflecting signed grant agreements for each strand) and for other costs is shown in Table 1. 
Rezultat za odhodke, nastale pri podprogramih, (ki odraža podpisane sporazume o donacijah za vsak podprogram) in za druge stroške je prikazan v tabeli 1.
Payments have been made at a much slower rate than commitments: at the end of 2006 payments to participants totalled 46,8 million euro. 
Plačila so se izvrševala veliko počasneje od prevzemanja obveznosti: ob koncu leta 2006 so vsa plačila udeležencem skupno znašala 46,8 milijona EUR.
8 BOX 3 EUROPEAN CAMPAIGN ON IMPROVING DRIVING BEHAVIOUR, ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ECODRIVEN: A STEER PROJECT Objective: To promote an energy efficient and safer driving style-behaviour (Eco-Driving) Duration: 01/2006 – 12/2008 Budget: 1 440 040 euro (EU contribution: 50 %) Ecodriven was a European-wide ecodriving campaign aiming at drivers of passenger cars, delivery vans, lorries and buses in nine EU countries. 
8 OKVIR 3 EVROPSKA KAMPANJA ZA BOLJŠE VEDENJE VOZNIKOV, ENERGETSKO UČINKOVITOST IN PROMETNO VARNOST ECODRIVEN: PROJEKT STEER Cilj: Spodbujati energetsko učinkovito in varnejše vedenje v prometu (ekovožnja).
TABLE 1 EXPENDITURE COMMITTED 20032006 9 Projects by grants No of grant agreements signed Mio EUR Altener (Renewables) 118 61,6 SAVE (Energy Efficiency) 106 56,2 STEER (Transport) 28 19,7 Horizontal actions 80 44,5 Specific support for events 77 2,7 Coopener 38 14,5 TOTAL grant-funded projects 447 199,2 Projects by public tender1 28 Project by concerted action2 2,2 Communication and support costs Energy and Transport DG 2,5 Running costs of the Executive Agency 8,9 TOTAL3 240,8 1 Public tender: contracts (mostly studies or IT services) initiated by the Commission. 
TABELA 1 PREVZETE OBVEZNOSTI ZA ODHODKE 20032006 9 Projekti po donacijah Št. podpisanih sporazumov o donacijah V milijonih EUR ALTENER (obnovljivi viri energije) 118 61,6 SAVE (energetska učinkovitost) 106 56,2 STEER (promet) 28 19,7 Horizontalni ukrepi 80 44,5 Posebna podpora za posamezne dogodke 77 2,7 COOPENER 38 14,5 Projekti, financirani z donacijami SKUPAJ 447 199,2 Projekti po javnih razpisih1 28 Projekti po usklajenem delovanju2 2,2 Stroški GD za energetiko in promet za komunikacijo in podporo 2,5 Tekoči stroški IEEA 8,9 SKUPAJ3 240,8 1 Javni razpis: pogodbe (večinoma študije ali storitve IT) na pobudo Komisije.
2 Concerted actions: A Concerted action was launched on the transposition and implementation of the directive related to the Energy Performance of BuilDings (EPBD). 
2 Usklajeno delovanje: usklajeno delovanje je bilo sproženo v zvezi s prenosom in izvajanjem direktive o energetski učinkovitosti stavb (EPBD).
3 This total includes the EFTA contribution to IEE. 
3 Ta skupni znesek zajema prispevek EFTA k IEE.
BOX 4 EUROPEAN PLATFORM FOR THE PROMOTION OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING EUROCONTRACT: A “HORIZONTAL PROJECT” Objective: To improve specification of energy use in contracts Duration: 01/2005 – 12/2007 Budget: 2 302 036 euro (EU contribution: 50 %) Under this project, model contracts, tender documents and quality standards for energy services were developed, leading to the production of guidebooks for use by municipalities, housing associations, and others involved in providing housing services. 
OKVIR 4 EVROPSKA PLATFORMA ZA SPODBUJANJE POGODBENEGA ZAGOTAVLJANJA PRIHRANKA ENERGIJE EUROCONTRACT: ”HORIZONTALNI PROJEKT” Cilj: Izboljšati navajanje porabe energije v pogodbah. Trajanje: 01/2005 – 12/2007 Proračun: 2 302 036 EUR (prispevek EU: 50%) V okviru tega projekta so bili pripravljeni vzorci pogodb, razpisne dokumentacije in standardi kakovosti za energetske storitve, kar je privedlo do izdelave priročnikov, namenjenih občinam, stanovanjskim združenjem ter drugim, ki sodelujejo pri zagotavljanju stanovanjskih storitev.
BEFORE IEE 20032006... 
PRED IEE 20032006...
SAVE and Altener, and some of the activities brought under Coopener in 2003, were previously funded under the 1998-2002 Energy Framework Programme. 
SAVE in ALTENER ter nekatere dejavnosti, zajete v COOPENER v letu 2003, so se prej financirali iz okvirnega programa za energetiko za obdobje 1998–2002.
Key changes for the 2003-2006 programme were: – the creation of an Executive Agency to run the programme; – grouping community support for those energy fields that contribute to sustainable development in a single programme; – the creation of a specific sub programme to fund activities related to transport. ... 
Ključne spremembe pri programu 2003–2006 so bile: – ustanovitev izvajalske agencije za izvajanje programa; – združitev pomoči Skupnosti za tista energetska področja, ki prispevajo k trajnostnemu razvoju, v en program; – uvedba posebnega podprograma za financiranje dejavnosti v zvezi s prometom. ...
AND AFTER 7. 
IN PO NJEM 7.
The follow-up programme, IEE2, covering the period 2007-2013, incorporates the following changes: – ending specific support for small “stand alone” events; – moving Coopener out of the programme; – allowing market replication projects (promotion of innovatory techniques, processes or products which have been successfully demonstrated but have not penetrated the market); and – increasing the maximum EU contribution to 75 % of costs and to 250 000 euro for the creation of new local and regional energy agencies, and allowing proposals for the creation of energy agencies to be submitted singly rather than as part of a consortium. 10 
Naslednji program, IEE2, ki pokriva obdobje 2007–2013, zajema naslednje spremembe: – ni več posebne podpore za majhne ”posamezne” dogodke; – COOPENER ni več del programa; – omogočanje projektov replikacije trga (spodbujanje inovativnih tehnik, procesov in proizvodov, ki so bili uspešno prikazani, vendar se niso pre-bili na trg) in – povečanje največjega možnega prispevka EU na 75% stroškov ter na 250 000 EUR za ustanavljanje novih lokalnih in regionalnih agencij za energijo ter uveljavitev samostojnega vlaganja predlogov za ustanovitev agencij za energijo, namesto v okviru konzorcija. 10
AUDIT APPROACH AND SCOPE 8. 
REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP IN OBSEG REVIZIJE 8.
The Court considered whether the Commission took reasonable steps to ensure that the Intelligent Energy for Europe programme was designed and implemented in an effective manner which added value at the European level. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali je Komisija izvedla ustrezne ukrepe, da bi zagotovila, da je bil program Inteligentna energija za Evropo uspešno zasnovan in izvajan, tako da je bila na evropski ravni dodana vrednost.
The audit asked: – how the Commission allocated funds; – how the Commission monitored and evaluated the programme; – what were the administrative costs of the programme; – what difference the executive agency made to the management of the programme. 
Revizija je zajela naslednja vprašanja: – kako je Komisija dodeljevala sredstva; – kako je Komisija spremljala in vrednotila program; – kakšni so bili administrativni stroški programa; – kaj je k upravljanju programa prispevala izvajalska agencija.
The audit involved: a) analysis of the legal basis of the programme, documents related to the decision process, and evaluations of IEE and of previous and successor programmes; b) analysis of reporting and monitoring documents of the Executive Agency; c) interviews with staff from Directorate-General for Energy and Transport (Energy and Transport DG) and the Executive Agency; d) analysis of calls for proposals; e) review of 65 project files; f) a survey which obtained data from 736 participants in the programme4; g) analysis of the project database. 
Revizijsko delo je zajemalo: a) analizo pravne podlage programa, dokumentov, povezanih s procesom odločanja in vrednotenja IEE ter prejšnjih in nadaljnjih programov; b) analizo dokumentov izvajalske agencije o poročanju in spremljanju; c) pogovore z uslužbenci Generalnega direktorata za energetiko in promet (GD za energetiko in promet) in izvajalske agencije; d) analizo razpisov za zbiranje predlogov; e) pregled 65 dosjejev o projektih; f) anketo, s katero so bili pridobljeni podatki pri 736 udeležencih pro-grama4; g) analizo podatkovne zbirke o projektih.
4 The survey questionnaire was sent in draft to the Commission services in November 2006. 
4 Osnutek vprašalnika je bil novembra 2006 poslan službam Komisije.
The survey was sent to all parties who had applied for funding by 7 November 2006. 
Vprašalnik je bil poslan vsem, ki so do 7. novembra 2006 zaprosili za sredstva.
In total 736 replies were received. 
Skupno je bilo prejetih 736 odgovorov.
The overall response rate to the survey was 29 %. 
Skupna stopnja odzivnosti je bila 29%.
Most of those who responded had participated in more than one project, thus providing a wide experience of the operation of the programme. 
Večina tistih, ki so odgovorili, je sodelovala pri več kot enem projektu in si s tem zagotovila široke izkušnje z delovanjem programa.
For example half of the respondents were able to compare the experience of working with DG Energy and Transport and the Agency. 
Polovica jih je na primer lahko primerjala sodelovanje z GD Energetika in promet in z Agencijo.
The survey invited applicants to specify the costs of preparing their proposals and, in the case of successful applicants, the cost of reporting to Brussels. 
Anketiranci so bili v vprašalniku pozvani, da navedejo stroške priprave svojih predlogov, uspešni vložniki pa tudi strošek poročanja Bruslju.
AUDIT FINDINGS PROGRAMMING AND ALLOCATION OF FUNDS 10. 
REVIZIJSKE UGOTOVITVE PROGRAMIRANJE IN DODELJEVANJE SREDSTEV 10.
Effective planning of public interventions requires a clear definition of objectives, an understanding of the way the instrument is expected to achieve these objectives; and clear criteria against which proposals are selected. 
Uspešno načrtovanje javnih posegov zahteva jasno opredelitev ciljev, razumevanje, kako naj bi instrument te cilje dosegel, ter jasna merila za izbiro predlogov.
Community legislation provided that funding from IEE 2003-2006 should be available for projects which: a) promote sustainable development, security of energy supply, competitiveness or environmental protection; b) create or develop structures and instruments for developing sustainable energy; c) promote sustainable energy systems and equipment; d) provide information, education and training; e) monitor the implementation and impact of Community initiatives; f) evaluate the impact of measures funded under the programme5. 
Zakonodaja Skupnosti je določala, da bi morala biti sredstva iz IEE 2003–2006 na voljo za projekte, ki: a) spodbujajo trajnostni razvoj, zanesljivost energetske oskrbe, konkurenčnost ali varstvo okolja; b) ustvarjajo ali razvijajo strukture in instrumente za razvoj trajnostne energije; c) spodbujajo sisteme in opremo za trajnostno energijo; d) zagotavljajo informacije, izobraževanje in usposabljanje; e) spremljajo izvajanje in učinek pobud Skupnosti; f) vrednotijo učinek ukrepov, financiranih v okviru programa5.
Financial assistance was to depend on the Community added value, benefit and impact of the action proposed6. 
Finančna pomoč naj bi bila odvisna od dodane vrednosti na ravni Skupnosti, koristi in učinka predlaganega ukrepa6.
The Commission put these principles into effect through: – a global work programme for 2003-2006 which established 17 “key actions”, subdivided into 63 “target areas” (listed in Annex I); – annual work programmes setting out guidelines for the sub programmes and for “key actions” and selection criteria7; – calls for proposals which set out eligibility and selection criteria leading 5 Decision No 1230/2003/EC, Article 4(1). 
Komisija je ta načela uresničila z: – globalnim delovnim programom 2003–2006, v katerem je določila 17 ”ključnih dejavnosti”, razdeljenih na 63 ”ciljnih področij” (naštetih v Prilogi I); – letnimi delovnimi programi, v katerih je določila smernice za podpro-grame in ”ključne ukrepe” ter za izbirna merila7; 5 Odločba št. 1230/2003/ES, člen 4(1). 6 Odločba št.
6 Decision No 1230/2003/EC, Article 4(2). 
1230/2003/ES, člen 4(2).
7 These work programmes were elaborated in consultation with representatives of all the participating countries. to grant agreements, following negotiation between the Commission and the consortium concerned; – calls for tender, leading to service contracts. 
7 Ti delovni programi so bili pripravljeni po posvetovanju s predstavniki vseh sodelujočih držav. – razpisi za zbiranje predlogov, v katerih so določena merila za upravičenost in izbirna merila in na podlagi katerih se po pogajanjih med Komisijo in zadevnim konzorcijem sklenejo sporazumi o donacijah; – razpisi, na podlagi katerih se sklenejo pogodbe o izvajanju storitev.
Panels of experts were set up for key actions for each call for proposals (see Annex I). 
Za ključne ukrepe so bili za vsak razpis za zbiranje predlogov ustanovljeni paneli strokovnjakov (glej Prilogo I).
Members of the panels evaluated proposals under five headings: – quality of action/agency/event; – quality of approach; – Community added value; – costs and benefits; – organisation of the team. 
Člani panelov so predloge vrednotili po petih postavkah: – kakovost ukrepa/agencije/dogodka; – kakovost pristopa; – dodana vrednost na ravni Skupnosti; – razmerje med stroški in koristmi; – organiziranost ekipe.
On the basis of the panel reports, an evaluation committee established a ranking list for approval. 
Ocenjevalni odbor je na podlagi poročil panelov pripravil prednostni seznam za odobritev.
A proposal was only accepted if it had an overall score, and a score for the fifth heading (organisation of the team), of 70 % or higher of available marks, with no scores on individual headings lower than 50 %. 
Predlog je bil sprejet samo, če sta njegova skupna ocena in ocena za peto postavko (organiziranost ekipe) znašali vsaj 70% najvišje možne ocene, nobena ocena za posamezno postavko pa ni bila nižja od 50 %.
Around 33 % of proposals received were accepted. 
Sprejetih je bilo približno 33 % prejetih predlogov.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS 15. 
PREDNOSTI IN OMEJITVE 15.
The Commission translated the objectives of the programme into specific actions. 
Komisija je cilje programa prenesla v specifične ukrepe.
It set up a system for the objective evaluation of proposals, and award of contracts. 
Vzpostavila je sistem za objektivno vrednotenje predlogov in dodeljevanje pogodb.
The experts evaluating and scoring proposals adequately justified and documented their evaluation and scoring of proposals. 
Strokovnjaki, ki so vrednotili in ocenjevali predloge, so svoje vrednotenje in ocenjevanje predlogov ustrezno utemeljili in dokumentirali.
The activities supported under this programme were largely inherited from previous programmes. 
Dejavnosti, podprte v okviru tega programa, so bile v veliki meri podedovane od prejšnjih programov.