natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, none of these documents cover GAEC standards. 
Vendar v nobenih od teh navodil niso zajeti standardi za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje.
With respect to SMRs, the scope and the practical pertinence of the documents is limited, as they do not provide the Member States with guidance on how to define operational obligations applicable to farmers. 
Kar zadeva predpisane zahteve ravnanja, sta obseg in praktična ustreznost dokumentov omejena, saj slednji ne vsebujejo smernic o tem, kako bi morale države članice določiti operativne obveznosti, ki se uporabljajo za kmete.
For instance, the Commission prepared a guidance document on environmental SMRs, for the purpose of defining a workable set of relevant and verifiable standards. 
Komisija je na primer pripravila smernice o predpisanih zahtevah ravnanja glede okolja, da bi določila uporaben niz ustreznih in preverljivih standardov.
However, the document merely copies the relevant legal texts, the only guidance given is that Member States should establish obligatory standards at farm level for each of these articles. 
Vendar ta dokument vsebuje le prepis ustreznih pravnih besedil, edino podano navodilo je, da bi morale države članice za vse te člene določiti obvezne standarde na ravni kmetij.
Types and examples of farmers’ practices and related control points are not detailed, which is necessary to make the legal framework operational. 
Vrste in primeri praks, ki jih izvajajo kmetje, ter z njimi povezane kontrolne točke niso podrobno opisani, kar je nujno za delovanje pravnega okvira.
The audit in the Member States revealed that for some environmental Directives, notably those for birds and habitats, only general legal requirements (i.e. not specifically related to farming activities) were established. 
Revizija v državah članicah je pokazala, da so bile za nekatere direktive o okolju, predvsem za direktivi o pticah in habitatih, določene le splošne pravne zahteve (ki se ne nanašajo izrecno na kmetijske dejavnosti).
The requirements deriving from the Regulation on food and feed law (see Table 1) were applicable under cross compliance as from January 2006. 
Zahteve, ki izhajajo iz uredbe o zakonodaji o krmi in živilih (glej tabelo 1), se v okviru navzkrižne skladnosti uporabljajo od januarja 2006.
The Commission published a guidance document in May 2006 to define the exact scope of certain of the provisions of food and feed law. 
Komisija je maja 2006 objavila smernice, s katerimi je želela opredeliti natančen obseg nekaterih določb zakonodaje o krmi in živilih.
This document was issued too late, and most Member States had already planned their cross compliance checks or started implementing them. 
Ta navodila so bila objavljena prepozno in večina držav članic je že začela načrtovati ali izvajati svoje preglede navzkrižne skladnosti.
As a result, the Court’s audit found that five out of six Member States7 had not performed the checks in accordance with the Commission’s 2006 guidelines. 
Tako je Sodišče pri reviziji ugotovilo, da pet od šestih držav članic7 pregledov ni izvajalo v skladu s smernicami Komisije iz leta 2006.
7 The SMRs did not apply in Poland at the time of the audit. 21 
7 V času revizije se na Poljskem predpisane zahteve ravnanja niso uporabljale. 21
Concerning SMRs, Member States are not only responsible for establishing the requirements applicable at farm level, but also for checking that farmers respect all elements of the legal framework for the SMRs. 
Kar zadeva predpisane zahteve ravnanja, države članice niso odgovorne le za določitev zahtev, ki se uporabljajo na ravni kmetij, ampak morajo tudi preverjati, da kmetje spoštujejo vse dele pravnega okvira za predpisane zahteve ravnanja.
A key check to ensure that the SMRs are implemented according to the legal provisions is therefore that of the completeness and quality of the requirements. 
Ključni pregled, s katerim se zagotovi, da se predpisane zahteve ravnanja izvajajo v skladu z zakonskimi določbami, je torej pregled celovitosti in kakovosti zahtev.
In other words, the Commission must ensure that Member States have defined adequate control points for all the legal texts of the framework. 
To pomeni, da mora Komisija zagotoviti, da države članice določijo ustrezne kontrolne točke za vsa pravna besedila tega okvira.
The Commission did not check whether and where this was the case. 
Komisija ni pregledala, ali je bilo to izvedeno in kje je bilo izvedeno.
The Court checked the completeness and quality of a sample of requirements. 
Sodišče je pregledalo celovitost in kakovost vzorca zahtev.
This revealed significant shortcomings (missing requirements, requirements with a limited extent or scope, checks which had not been carried out) (see paragraphs 22 and 23) in all Member States audited8, notably in the area of the environment. 
Pri tem je v vseh revidiranih državah članicah8 odkrilo bistvene pomanjkljivosti (manjkajoče zahteve, zahteve z omejenim dosegom ali obsegom, neizvedeni pregledi) predvsem na področju okolja (glej odstavka 22 in 23).
Since the Commission does not systematically identify such cases, it could not take action to address these shortcomings. 
Ker Komisija takšnih primerov ne ugotavlja sistematično, ni mogla sprejeti ukrepov za odpravo teh pomanjkljivosti.
Concerning GAEC, the Commission checked whether or not Member States had defined standards. 
Komisija je glede dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev preverila, ali so države članice določile standarde.
But no systematic action was taken to address cases of unjustified missing standards until July 2007. 
Vendar do julija 2007 ni bilo sistematičnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi se obravnavali primeri neutemeljeno manjkajočih standardov.
This caused difficulties at the time of approving rural development programmes. 
To je povzročilo težave v času odobritve programov za razvoj podeželja.
The Commission was faced with cases where Member States proposed agri-environment measures to address environmental problems which should have been treated in the framework of GAEC. 
Komisija se je soočala s primeri, ko so države članice predlagale kmetijsko okoljske ukrepe za odpravo okoljskih težav, ki bi morale biti obravnavane v okviru dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev.
The Commission did request the Member States to define GAEC standards appropriate to these cases. 
Komisija je od držav članic zahtevala, da določijo ustrezne standarde za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje za te primere.
However, when no agri-environment measure was proposed by the Member States, the Commission did not take any action with the result that the standards involved were left missing. 
Vendar Komisija ni ukrepala, če države članice niso predlagale nobenega kmetijsko okoljskega ukrepa, zaradi česar še vedno ni bilo zadevnih standardov.
The Commission did not check whether the standards avoided the abandonment of land and ensured that land is maintained in GAEC. 
Komisija ni preverila, ali so standardi preprečili opuščanje zemljišč in zagotovili, da se zemljišča obdelujejo v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji.
The legal provision that standards must take into account the specific characteristics of regions (Article 5(1) of the Council Regulation) was not checked either. 
Preverjena ni bila niti zakonska določba o tem, da morajo biti v standardih upoštevane posebne značilnosti regij (člen 5(1) Uredbe Sveta).
The audit identified problems relating to the quality of the standards for GAEC in all Member States visited. 
Pri reviziji so bile v vseh obiskanih državah članicah ugotovljene težave glede kakovosti standardov za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje.
Such cases are not systematically identified and addressed by the Commission. 
Komisija takšnih primerov ne ugotavlja in obravnava sistematično.
8 The SMRs did not apply in Poland at the time of the audit. 22 
8 V času revizije se na Poljskem predpisane zahteve ravnanja niso uporabljale. 22
CROSS COMPLIANCE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 45. 
NAVZKRIŽNA SKLADNOST IN RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA 45.
According to financial plans, around one quarter of the CAP expenditure during the 2007-2013 period should go to Rural Development. 
V skladu s finančnimi načrti naj bi bila približno četrtina odhodkov za SKP v obdobju 2007–2013 namenjena razvoju podeželja.
The Council Regulation on Rural Development9 stipulates that, as from January 2007, cross compliance applies to 8 of the 42 measures established by this Regulation. 
Uredba Sveta o razvoju podeželja9 določa, da se navzkrižna skladnost od januarja 2007 uporablja za osem od 42 ukrepov, ki jih uvaja ta uredba.
These eight area-or animal-related measures, including the financially most important one, agri-environment, represent around 40 % of Rural Development expenditure. 
Teh osem ukrepov glede živali ali zemljišč, med katerimi je tudi okolje, ki je s finančnega vidika najpomembnejši ukrep, predstavlja okoli 40 % odhodkov za razvoj podeželja.
The audit disclosed that, in reality, cross compliance would apply to around a third of Rural Development expenditure over the period. 
Revizija je pokazala, da bi navzkrižna skladnost dejansko veljala za okoli tretjino odhodkov za razvoj podeželja v omenjenem obdobju.
This situation results from the following oversight in the implementation of cross compliance policy. 
To stanje je posledica naslednje napake pri izvajanju politike navzkrižne skladnosti.
Agri-environment measures are generally implemented through five year contracts with farmers. 
Kmetijsko okoljski ukrepi se običajno izvajajo po petletnih pogodbah s kmeti.
But, in most Member States audited, the audit found that cross compliance would not apply to expenditure incurred in 2007 and subsequent years and based on contracts concluded before January 2007. 
Vendar je bilo v večini revidiranih držav članic pri reviziji ugotovljeno, da se navzkrižna skladnost ne bo uporabljala za odhodke, nastale v letu 2007 in v naslednjih letih, ki temeljijo na pogodbah, sklenjenih pred januarjem 2007.
These contracts were concluded for a new period of five years and therefore their execution will extend into the new financial period but they did not specify that cross compliance would apply as from January 2007. 
Te pogodbe so bile sklenjene za novo petletno obdobje, zato se bo njihovo izvajanje nadaljevalo v novem finančnem obdobju, vendar v njih ni bilo navedeno, da se bo od januarja 2007 uporabljala navzkrižna skladnost.
CERTAIN KEY ELEMENTS OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND SANCTION SYSTEMS ARE WEAKENED BY THE INTRODUCTION OF CROSS COMPLIANCE 47. 
NEKATERI KLJUČNI ELEMENTI SISTEMOV KONTROLE IN SANKCIJ NA PODROČJU RAZVOJA PODEŽELJA SO OSLABLJENI ZARADI UVEDBE NAVZKRIŽNE SKLADNOSTI 47.
Before cross compliance applied to rural development, farmers benefitting from the two financially largest measures (agri-environment and compensatory allowances under less favoured areas) needed to adhere to at least the standard of “usual good farming practice” throughout the farm. 
Preden se je začela za razvoj podeželja uporabljati navzkrižna skladnost, so morali kmetje, ki so bili upravičeni do sredstev iz dveh finančno največjih ukrepov (kmetijsko okoljski ukrepi in nadomestila za območja z omejenimi možnostmi), na celotni kmetiji spoštovati vsaj standard „običajne dobre kmetijske prakse“.
This was defined as the standard which a reasonable farmer would follow in the region concerned, including compliance with mandatory environmental and animal welfare requirements. 
Ta je bil opredeljen kot standard, ki bi ga spoštoval razumni kmet v zadevni regiji, zajemal pa je tudi skladnost z obveznimi zahtevami glede okolja in dobrega počutja živali.
Member States had to define verifiable standards in their rural development plans, which were part of the Commission’s approval procedure. 
Države članice so morale v svojih načrtih za razvoj podeželja, ki so bili del Komisijinega postopka odobritve, določiti preverljive standarde.
Good farming practice was an eligibility criterion to benefit from the two measures, and it was checked on at least 5 % of the farms. 
Dobra kmetijska praksa je sodila med pogoje za upravičenost do sredstev iz teh dveh ukrepov, preverjena pa je bila vsaj na 5 % kmetij.
9 Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ L 277, 21.10.2005, p. 
1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) (UL L 277, 21.10.2005, str.
A comparison of the standards defining usual good farming practice with requirements and standards established under cross compliance revealed that in most Member States audited many important obligations no longer applied. 
Primerjava med standardi, s katerimi je opredeljena običajna dobra kmetijska praksa, ter zahtevami in standardi, določenimi v okviru navzkrižne skladnosti, je pokazala, da se številne pomembne obveznosti v večini revidiranih držav članic niso več uporabljale.
This resulted in a significant weakening, notably in Poland where the SMRs do not yet apply. 
To je povzročilo bistveno poslabšanje kontrole, predvsem na Poljskem, kjer se predpisane zahteve ravnanja še ne uporabljajo.
Since January 2007, such requirements as those which existed under rural development for habitat protection, prevention of water contamination, etc. are no longer checked under cross compliance. This situation will continue until SMRs are introduced in Poland between 2009-2011. 
Od januarja 2007 se pri navzkrižni skladnosti ne preverjajo več zahteve, ki so obstajale v okviru razvoja podeželja za zaščito habitatov, preprečevanje onesnaževanja vode itd. To stanje se bo nadaljevalo, dokler ne bodo na Poljskem med letoma 2009 in 2011 uvedene predpisane zahteve ravnanja.
The introduction of cross compliance has weakened the following rural development provisions: (a) there is no longer a regulatory provision that Member States must define verifiable standards; (b) the standards at Member State level are no longer approved by the Commission; (c) cross compliance conditions are no longer eligibility criteria; (d) good farming practice is checked on 5 % of farms and cross compliance requirements and standards are checked on 1 % of farms; (e) important conditions of the old system of good farming practice no longer apply; (f) sanctions are generally lower, even for a violation of the same requirement. 
Uvedba navzkrižne skladnosti je oslabila naslednje določbe razvoja podeželja: (a) ni več uredbene določbe, da morajo države članice določiti preverljive standarde; (b) standardov na ravni držav članic ne odobri več Komisija; (c) pogoji navzkrižne skladnosti niso več merila za upravičenost; (d) dobra kmetijska praksa se preverja na 5 % kmetij, zahteve in standardi navzkrižne skladnosti pa na 1 % kmetij; (e) pomembni pogoji starega sistema dobre kmetijske prakse se več ne uporabljajo; (f) sankcije so na splošno nižje in to celo za kršitev iste zahteve.
As noted before (see paragraph 46), most Member States audited decided to keep the old rules for current expenditure relating to agri-environment contracts concluded before 2007. 
Večina revidiranih držav članic se je, kot je bilo že omenjeno (glej odstavek 46), odločila za ohranitev starih pravil za tekoče odhodke v zvezi s kmetijsko okoljskimi pogodbami, sklenjenimi pred letom 2007.
Because cross compliance applies to expenditure related to contracts concluded since 2007, two control systems are in place at the same time. 
Ker se navzkrižna skladnost uporablja za odhodke v zvezi s pogodbami, sklenjenimi od leta 2007 dalje, se istočasno uporabljata dva sistema kontrole.
In view of the differences between these systems (control rates, requirements etc.) this requires additional administrative work for Member State authorities. 24 
Zaradi razlik med sistemoma (stopnje kontrole, zahteve itd.) imajo organi držav članic dodatno administrativno delo. 24
In addition, this leads to the situation of two farmers benefiting from the same agri-environment scheme having to fulfil different obligations depending on when they signed their contract, before or after 2007. 
Poleg tega to povzroča, da morata kmeta, upravičena do iste kmetijsko okoljske sheme, izpolniti različne obveznosti, odvisno od tega, ali sta svoji pogodbi podpisala pred 1. januarjem leta 2007 ali po njem.
Consequently, one farmer will be sanctioned for violation of an obligation, while another will not as he does not have to respect this obligation. 
Tako bo en kmet zaradi kršitve določene obveznosti sankcioniran, drugi pa ne, saj mu te obveznosti ni treba spoštovati.
This situation will remain until 2011, when the five year contracts concluded in 2006 will expire. 
To stanje se bo nadaljevalo do leta 2011, ko se bodo iztekle petletne pogodbe, sklenjene v letu 2006.
A clear delineation between agri-environment and cross compliance is important. 
Pomembna je jasna razmejitev med kmetijsko okoljskimi ukrepi in navzkrižno skladnostjo.
Firstly, this must ensure that farmers are not paid under agri-environment for what they are legally required to do under cross compliance. 
Najprej se z razmejitvijo zagotovi, da kmetje v okviru kmetijsko okoljskih ukrepov niso plačani za to, kar so po zakonu dolžni storiti v okviru navzkrižne skladnosti.
Secondly, cross compliance applies to all farmers receiving direct payments, whereas agri-environmental commitments are voluntary. 
Poleg tega navzkrižna skladnost velja za vse kmete, ki prejemajo neposredna plačila, medtem ko se kmetijsko okoljske obveznosti prevzemajo prostovoljno.
Cross compliance requirements and standards are necessary to set a sound minimum level. 
Zahteve in standardi navzkrižne skladnosti so nujni za določitev dobre minimalne stopnje kmetijsko okoljskih obveznosti.
With respect to cross compliance, Member States have considerable room to define the obligations imposed on farmers, especially for GAEC standards. 
Države članice imajo glede navzkrižne skladnosti precej svobode pri določitvi obveznosti za kmete, zlasti pri standardih za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje.
Where cross compliance and agri-environment apply to the same objects (landscape elements, biodiversity, etc.) this means that the level of agri-environment obligations, and consequently its effects, are determined by the level of cross compliance obligations. 
Kjer se navzkrižna skladnost in kmetijsko okoljski ukrepi uporabljajo za iste zadeve (krajinski elementi, biotska raznovrstnost itd.), so stopnja kmetijsko okoljskih obveznosti in posledično njeni učinki določeni s stopnjo obveznosti navzkrižne skladnosti.
In each of the Member States visited, the audit found obligations established under agri-environment schemes which could also have been included under cross compliance. 
V vseh obiskanih državah članicah so bile pri reviziji v okviru kmetijsko okoljskih shem odkrite obveznosti, ki bi lahko bile zajete tudi v navzkrižno skladnost.
Doing so would have led to a reduction of the agri-environment payments concerned. 
Na ta način bi se znižala zadevna kmetijsko okoljska plačila.
For instance, in Portugal, there are agri-environmental schemes to retain terraces and for crop rotation, but the standards required for this by cross compliance were not applied. 
Na Portugalskem na primer obstajajo kmetijsko okoljske sheme za ohranjevanje teras in kolobarjenje, vendar se standardi, ki jih za to zahteva navzkrižna skladnost, niso izvajali.
When these standards are included under cross compliance the amounts to be paid under agri-environment will be reduced, because farmers are only compensated for additional obligations. 25 
Ko bodo ti standardi zajeti v navzkrižno skladnost, se bodo zneski za plačilo pri kmetijsko okoljskih ukrepih znižali, saj kmetje prejmejo nadomestilo le za dodatne obveznosti. 25
In Greece, the main aim of the agri-environment scheme for the extensification of animal farming is to reduce stocking densities for pasture land. 
V Grčiji je glavni namen kmetijsko okoljske sheme za ekstenzifikacijo živinoreje zmanjšanje gostote živali na pašnikih.
The Greek authorities could not explain whether the agri-environment measure was stricter than the cross compliance standard. 
Grški organi oblasti niso mogli pojasniti, ali je kmetijsko okoljski ukrep strožji od standarda navzkrižne skladnosti.
The different choices made by the Member States lead to a situation where farmers may be paid for certain obligations in one Member State, while they are required to do so without compensation in another Member State. 
Zaradi različnih izbir držav članic prihaja do tega, da so lahko kmetje v eni državi članici plačani za določene obveznosti, ki jih morajo kmetje v drugi državi članici izpolniti, ne da bi prejeli nadomestilo.
For instance, farmers in the Netherlands are required to sow a catch crop10 after the maize harvest, as this is a requirement under the nitrates Directive. 
Kmetje na Nizozemskem morajo na primer po žetvi koruze posejati naknadne posevke10, ker je to ena od zahtev direktive o nitratih.
Across the border, in Belgium, farmers are paid for that same practice, as it is included under an agri-environmental scheme in Flanders. 
Kmetje čez mejo v Belgiji pa so za to isto prakso plačani, ker je slednja zajeta v kmetijsko okoljsko shemo v Flandriji.
These are strips bordering agricultural parcels where certain farming practices are prohibited. 
To so območja, ki mejijo na kmetijske parcele, kjer so določeni načini kmetovanja prepovedani.
For instance, strips left untilled alongside water courses prevent soil erosion, which is a GAEC issue. 
Neob-delana območja vzdolž vodotokov na primer preprečujejo erozijo tal, ki je ena od zadev pri dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih.
The prohibition to apply manure and plant protection products on buffer strips reduces water contamination and is beneficial for biodiversity. These issues are included in the framework for cross compliance. 
Prepoved nanosa gnoja in fitofarmacevtskih sredstev na varnostnih območjih zmanjšuje onesnaževanje vode in ugodno vpliva na biotsko raznovrstnost. Ti zadevi sta zajeti v okvir navzkrižne skladnosti.
Consequently, several Member States implemented buffer strips under cross compliance. 
Tako je več držav članic varnostna območja uveljavljalo pri navzkrižni skladnosti.
However, not all Member States did as there is no specific obligation to do so. 
Vendar tega niso storile vse države članice, saj to ni nikjer izrecno zahtevano.
Some Member States decided to include buffer strips in agri-environment schemes. 
Nekatere države članice so se odločile, da varnostna območja zajamejo v kmetijsko okoljske sheme.
Box 3 shows the different choices made by some of the Member States audited for implementing buffer strips. 
V spodnjem okviru so prikazane različne izbire nekaterih revidiranih držav članic glede vzpostavitve varnostnih območij.
These choices affect the level of agri-environment payments and the environmental impacts to be achieved. 
Te izbire vplivajo na stopnjo kmetijsko okoljskih plačil in okoljske učinke, ki jih je treba doseči.
10 Catch crops are crops that are sown to prevent minerals (e.g. nitrates) being flushed away from the soil. 26 
10 Naknadni posevki se posejejo za preprečevanje izpiranja mineralov (tj. nitratov) iz prsti. 26
As mentioned before, Member States implemented requirements and standards only partially (see paragraphs 22 and 23). 
Države članice so, kot je že bilo omenjeno, le delno izvajale zahteve in standarde (glej odstavka 22 in 23).
This weakness was mainly found in the areas of environment and food safety. 
Ta slabost je bila odkrita predvsem na področjih okolja in varnosti hrane.
In Finland for instance, more than 30 requirements resulting from the legal framework for SMRs (15 for the environmental Directives and 15 for the Regulation on food and feed law11) were not checked under cross compliance. 
Na Finskem se pri navzkrižni skladnosti na primer ni preverjalo več kot 30 zahtev, ki izhajajo iz pravnega okvira za predpisane zahteve ravnanja (15 iz direktiv o okolju in 15 iz uredbe o zakonodaji o krmi in živilih11).