natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For instance, in Sweden, Brandenburg, Poland and France, nature conservation plans, established on a case-by-case basis, are mandatory for sub-measures dealing with the protection of biodiversity in specific areas. 
Na primer, na Švedskem, v Brandenburgu, na Poljskem in v Franciji so načrti za ohranjanje narave, pripravljeni za vsak posamezen primer, obvezni za podukrepe za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti na posameznih območjih.
Dissemination of good practice is one way of providing guidance for administrators and beneficiaries alike. 
Razširjanje dobre prakse je eden od načinov za usmerjanje upravnega osebja in upravičencev.
The Commission implemented structures such as the European Network for Rural Development, which aims to collect, disseminate and consolidate good rural development practice at EU level. 
Komisija je uvedla strukture, kot je Evropska mreža za razvoj podeželja, ki je namenjena zbiranju, razširjanju in utrjevanju dobre prakse za razvoj podeželja na ravni EU.
However, this was limited in the field of agri-environment, as only a few concrete examples of good practice were identified by the existing structures. 
Vendar pa je bilo to na kmetijsko-okoljskem področju omejeno, saj so obstoječe strukture ugotovile le nekaj primerov dobre prakse.
31 Little dissemination of good practice and feedback to farmers Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
31 Razširjanja dobre prakse in povratnih informacij za kmete je malo Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
At Member State level, the audit revealed that the administrative authorities responsible rarely provided feedback to beneficiairies after a contract had been signed on the results achieved for agri-environment sub-measures. 
Na ravni držav članic je revizija pokazala, da odgovorni upravni organi po podpisu pogodbe upravičencem le redko dajejo povratne informacije o doseženih rezultatih pri kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepih.
This was only the case for 2 % of the sample of 203 contracts audited. 
Tako je bilo le pri 2 % od revidiranega vzorca 203 pogodb.
Providing feedback may help improve the farmers’ awareness and understanding of the environmental effects of the sub-measures implemented, in particular where farmers have changed their practices. 
Povratne informacije lahko povečajo ozaveščenost kmetov in njihovo razumevanje vplivov izvedenih podukrepov na okolje, zlasti kadar kmetje spremenijo svoje načine kmetovanja.
WEAKNESSES IN ESTABLISHING AID AMOUNTS FOR AGRI-ENVIRONMENT PAYMENTS existing procedures do not prevent mistAkes And shortcomings in the cAlculAtion of Aid Amounts 58. 
POMANJKLJIVOSTI PRI DOLOČANJU ZNESKOV POMOČI ZA KMETIJSKO-OKOLJSKA PLAČILA obstoječi postopKi ne preprečujejo napaK in pomanjKljivosti pri izračunu znesKov pomoči 58.
In their programmes, Member States are required to provide the methodology and agronomic assumptions for their calculations. 
Države članice morajo v svojih programih prikazati metodologijo in agronomske predpostavke za svoje izračune.
However, they are not required to provide detailed figures and aid calculations, which are indeed not systematically included in the programmes. 
Vendar pa jim ni treba zagotoviti podrobnih številčnih podatkov in izračunov pomoči, ki niso sistematično vključeni v programe.
The programmes must also show that appropriate expertise was provided by bodies independent from those responsible for the calculations, which was, however, not systematically done. 
Programi morajo prav tako dokazovati, da so organi, neodvisni od tistih, ki so odgovorni za izračune, zagotovili ustrezno stro-kovnost, kar pa ni bilo sistematično narejeno.
A good example is the Piedmont programme, which sets out in detail the expertise provided. The latter included checking the correctness of the calculations and concluding on whether the applicable legal requirements had been fulfilled. As part of its programme approval procedures, the Commission checked the aid amounts. 
Dober primer je program za Piemont, ki podrobno prikazuje zagotovljeno pomoč strokovnjakov, ki so med drugim preverili pravilnost izračunov in ugotovili, ali so bile izpolnjene ustrezne zakonske zahteve. Komisija je v okviru svojih postopkov za potrjevanje programov preverila zneske pomoči.
However, these checks were limited to the ‘plausibility’ of the calculations. 
Vendar pa so bile te kontrole omejene na preverjanje „verodostojnosti“ izračunov.
The above procedures did not prevent mistakes and shortcomings in the calculations of the aid amounts. 
Zgoraj omenjeni postopki niso preprečili napak in pomanjkljivosti pri izračunih zneskov pomoči.
Simple calculation mistakes of up to 8,5 % of the amounts were found in Andalusia, Piedmont and Sweden. 
Enostavne računske napake v višini do 8,5 % zneskov so bile odkrite v Andaluziji, Piemontu in na Švedskem.
Relevant factors, such as cost savings resulting from a lower fertiliser use, were not taken into account in the calculations as required. 
Pomembni dejavniki, kot so prihranki pri stroških zaradi manjše uporabe gnojil, pri izračunih niso bili upoštevani, čeprav je bilo to zahtevano.
Finally, some Member States used outdated figures to calculate key elements of aid amounts, such as Poland which used figures from 2001–03 for income foregone despite significant increases since then. 32 Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
In končno, nekatere države članice so za izračun ključnih elementov za zneske pomoči uporabile zastarele številčne podatke, kot npr. Poljska, ki je za izgubljeni dohodek uporabila podatke za obdobje 2001–2003, čeprav so se ti od takrat močno povečali. 32 Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
Existing procedures also do not prevent agri-environment payments from being made for farming practices that were already applied by the beneficiaries. 
Obstoječi postopki ne preprečujejo tega, da bi se kmetijsko-okoljska plačila izvajala za načine kmetovanja, ki so jih upravičenci že uporabljali.
In Andalusia, beekeepers are compensated under the agri-environment sub-measure for recording their activities in a register, which overlaps considerably with already existing recording requirements. 
V Andaluziji čebelarji v okviru kmetijsko-okoljskega podukrepa dobijo nadomestilo za vpis svojih dejavnosti v register, kar se v veliki meri prekriva z že obstoječimi zahtevami za evidentiranje.
In the case of one project visited, a beekeeper had received 1 770 euro for the latter requirements, which in practice consisted in recording a few lines in his register (see Picture 4). 
Pri enem od projektov, ki so si ga revizorji ogledali na terenu, je čebelar dobil 1 770 EUR za izpolnitev teh zahtev, kar je v praksi pomenilo, da je v svoj register vpisal le nekaj vrst (glej fotografijo 4).
Picture 4: Farm register of a Spanish beekeeper visited by the Court. 
Fotografija 4: Register na kmetiji španskega čebelarja, ki so ga obiskali predstavniki Sodišča.
Registration of the movements of beehives is a ‘farming practice’ compensated by the EU’s agri-environment sub-measure. 33 Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
Vpis premikov panjev je način kmetovanja, za katerega se prejme nadomestilo v okviru kmetijsko-okoljskega podukrepa EU. 33 Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
The most material shortcoming was found in France for the basic sub-measure aiming to maintain grassland areas in order to protect biodiversity. 
Najpomembnejša pomanjkljivost je bila ugotovljena v Franciji pri osnovnem podukrepu, namenjenem ohranjanju travinja zaradi ohranjanja biotske raznovrstnosti.
Around 770 million euro are to be spent on this during the 2007–13 period, of which 235 million euro in EU funds were already spent in 2007–09. 
V obdobju 2007–2013 naj bi za to porabili približno 770 milijonov EUR, od katerih je bilo 235 milijonov EUR sredstev EU že porabljenih v letih 2007–2009.
The calculations used to justify the aid amounts are mainly based on a reduction of nitrate fertiliser. 
Izračuni, ki upravičujejo znesek pomoči, v glavnem temeljijo na zmanjšanju porabe dušičnih gnojil.
The parameters used for the calculation do not correspond to those actually applied in the areas where the sub-measure is implemented (see Box 4). 
Parametri, uporabljeni pri izračunu, ne ustrezajo tistim, ki se dejansko uporabljajo na območjih, na katerih se izvaja ta podukrep (glej okvir 4).
This was not checked by the Commission when it approved the French programme. 
Komisija tega ni preverila, ko je potrdila francoski program.
34 BOX 4 CALCULATION OF AID AMOUNTS DISSOCIATED FROM EXISTING FARMING PRACTICES Around 90 % of the aid amount for the French sub-measure on maintaining grassland is based on the lower income resulting from a reduction of the level of fertilisation on grasslands from 180 kg of nitrate per hectare to 125 kg. 
34 OKVIR 4 IZRAČUN ZNESKOV POMOČI NE GLEDE NA OBSTOJEČE NAČINE KMETOVANJA Približno 90 % zneska pomoči za francoski podukrep ohranjanja travinja temelji na nižjem dohodku zaradi zmanjšanja porabe gnojil na travinju s 180 kg nitratov na hektar na 125 kg.
Estimates of data from a statistical source used by the national authorities in the calculations show that the levels of fertilisation actually employed are, on average, around 65 kg of nitrate per hectare and therefore well below the threshhold of 125 kg per hectare. 
Ocene podatkov iz statističnega vira, ki so ga pri izračunih uporabili nacionalni organi, kažejo, da se v resnici za gnojenje že uporablja povprečno približno 65 kg nitratov na hektar, kar je veliko pod pragom 125 kg na hektar.
This was also confirmed by the three farmers visited by the Court, two of whom used an average of 15 kg of nitrate per hectare and one used 60 kg at the most. 
To so potrdili tudi trije kmetje, ki so jih obiskali predstavniki Sodišča in od katerih sta dva uporabljala povprečno 15 kg nitratov na hektar, tretji pa največ 60 kg.
This shows that farmers are being compensated for practices that they were already implementing. 
To kaže, da kmetje dobivajo nadomestila za načine kmetovanja, ki so jih že izvajali.
The French authorities explain that the threshhold of 125 kg is a reference practice considered favourable for the environment even though it exceeds the levels of fertilisation actually employed by the farmers. 
Francoski organi pojasnjujejo, da je prag 125 kg referenčna vrednost, ki velja kot ugodna za okolje, čeprav presega količino gnojil, ki jo kmetje v resnici uporabljajo.
These explanations are not in line with the view expressed in a Commission document 18 presented to the Member States, which drew attention to the risk of compensating ‘farmers for whom (parts of ) the obligations are normal practice or to base the calculations on figures which are not representative for a specific region. 
Te razlage niso v skladu z mnenjem, izraženim v dokumentu Komisije18, ki je bil predložen državam članicam in je opozoril na nevarnost plačevanja nadomestil kmetom, ki (del) obveznosti izpolnjujejo že z ustaljenim načinom kmetovanja, ali uporabe številčnih podatkov, ki niso reprezentativni za posamezno regijo, za izračune.
This risk becomes in particular evident if an aid is calculated as (e.g. nationwide) average without taking into account different agronomic and cost structures in the regions’. 
Nevarnost postane še zlasti očitna, če se pomoč izračuna kot (npr. nacionalno) povprečje, ne da bi se upoštevale različne agronomske in stroškovne strukture v regijah.
18 RuralDevelopmentCommittee,WorkingDocumentRD10/07/2006-final,Agri-environmentcommitmentsandtheirverifiability. Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
18 Odborzarazvojpodeželja,delovnidokumentRD10/07/2006-končno,Kmetijsko-okoljskezavezeinnjihovapreverljivost. Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
The value of the parameters used to calculate the aid amounts changes over time with the result that certain sub-measures, like the ones aiming to diversify crop rotation, may become insufficiently attractive to potential beneficiaries in financial terms. 
Vrednost parametrov, uporabljenih za izračun zneskov pomoči, se sčasoma spreminja, zato lahko nekateri podukrepi, npr. za diverzifikacijo kolobarjenja, postanejo finančno premalo privlačni za morebitne upravičence.
This situation occurred for instance in France, where a sub-measure had to be closed for new beneficiaires during 2008 due to a lack of interest. 
To se je zgodilo npr. v Franciji, kjer je bilo treba leta 2008 neki podukrep zaradi pomanjkanja zanimanja zapreti za nove upravičence.
However, most Member States kept aid amounts stable over the duration of the contract to provide some security to farmers and because the cost of adapting aid amounts to changing circumstances could prove higher than the benefit farmers would derive from such change. 
Vendar pa je večina držav članic ohranila stalne zneske pomoči ves čas veljavnosti pogodbe, da bi kmetom zagotovila delno varnost in ker bi lahko bili stroški prilagajanja zneskov pomoči spreminjajočim se razmeram višji od koristi, ki bi jih imeli kmetje od teh sprememb.
For the 203 contracts reviewed by the Court, a system of revision of prices existed in 10 % of the cases. the aid amounts are not differentiated enough according to regionaL or LocaL site conditions 63. 
Sistem ponovnega preverjanja cen se je uporabljal v 10 % primerov od 203 pogodb, ki jih je Sodišče revidiralo. znesKi pomoči se ne razliKujejo dovolj glede na regionalne ali loKalne Krajevne razmere 63.
Agri-environment sub-measures can be implemented in areas with different characteristics (soil quality, rainfall, geography: plains, mountains, etc) which affect the costs and income of the farms. 
Kmetijsko-okoljski podukrepi se lahko izvajajo na območjih z različnimi značilnostmi (kakovost tal, padavine, zemljepisne razmere: ravnine, hribi itd.), ki vplivajo na stroške in dohodek kmetij.
Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 states that Member States shall ensure that financial support for agri-environment sub-measures is differentiated to take into account regional or local site conditions and actual land use as appropriate. 
Člen 53 Uredbe (ES) št. 1974/2006 določa, da države članice zagotovijo, da se finančna podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske podukrepe razlikuje, tako da se ustrezno upoštevajo regionalne ali lokalne krajevne razmere in dejanska raba zemljišča.
When insufficiently differentiated average costs and incomes are used to calculate aid amounts for agri-environment, some farms are overcompensated, leading to an inefficient use of public funds, and some are undercompensated, risking that the participation rate may be too low to have an effect. 
Kadar se za izračun zneskov pomoči na kmetijsko-okoljskem področju uporabljajo povprečni stroški in dohodek, ki niso dovolj diferencirani, dobijo nekateri kmeti prevelika nadomestila, posledica česar je neučinkovita raba javnih sredstev, drugi pa premajhna nadomestila, zaradi česar bi lahko bila stopnja sodelovanja prenizka, da bi se dosegel učinek.
As an illustration, 2006 data shows that yields in olive production in Andalusia varied between 0,48 tonnes/hectare in non-irrigated areas and 5,46 tonnes/hectare in irrigated areas. 
V ponazoritev naj navedemo, da podatki za leto 2006 kažejo, da je znašal donos pri pridelavi oljk v Andaluziji od 0,48 t/ha na nenama-kanih območjih do 5,46 t/ha na namakanih območjih.
Despite these differences, an average of 3,5 tonnes/hectare was used for the aid calculation, without differentiating between irrigated and non-irrigated areas. 
Kljub tem razlikam se je za izračun pomoči upoštevala povprečna količina 3,5 t/ha, ne da bi upoštevali razlike med namakanimi in nenamakanimi območji.
The Court identified cases where differentation would provide possible benefits to farmers but with a possible extra administrative cost in four Member States with national programmes (France, Poland, Hungary and Sweden). 35 Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
Sodišče je v štirih državah članicah, ki imajo nacionalne programe (Francija, Poljska, Madžarska in Švedska), našlo primere, pri katerih bi upoštevanje razlik kmetom prineslo možne koristi, vendar ob morebitnih dodatnih administrativnih stroških. 35 Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
The French authorities decided to use national averages for the basic sub-measure described in Box 4, despite the need to differentiate aid amounts according to plain, mountain and less-favoured areas. 
Francoske oblasti so se odločile, da bodo za osnovni podukrep, opisan v okviru 4, uporabile nacionalna povprečja, čeprav bi bilo treba ločevati med zneski pomoči glede na to, ali gre za ravninska ali hribovita območja ali območja z omejenimi možnostmi.
If the French aid amounts had been differentiated, the amounts in the plains and less favoured areas could have been respectively 33 % and 20 % lower, representing around 8 million euro of EU funds in 2009. 
Če bi se francoski zneski pomoči med sabo razlikovali, bi lahko bili zneski za ravninska območja in območja z omejenimi možnostmi nižji za 33 % oz. 20 %, kar bi zneslo približno 8 milijonov EUR iz sredstev EU za leto 2009.
In Poland, the same amount for income foregone was used for more than 10 different sub-measures, despite the need to differentiate e.g. between arable crops and grassland. 
Na Poljskem so enak znesek za nadomestilo izgubljenega dohodka uporabili za več kot 10 različnih podukrepov, čeprav bi bilo treba ločevati med npr. poljščinami in travinjem.
The aid amounts were also not differentiated for the various regions despite their very different characteristics. pArticipAtion rAte in bAsic meAsures 67. 
Poleg tega ni bilo razlike med zneski pomoči za razne regije kljub velikim razlikam v njihovih značilnostih. stopnja sodelovanja pri osnovnih uKrepih 67.
For basic sub-measures, farmer participation must be high enough to provide effects in a given area. 
Za doseganje učinka na nekem območju mora pri osnovnih podukrepih sodelovati dovolj veliko število kmetov.
However, most Member States do not assess the minimum participation level needed to ensure that sub-measures provide the expected environmental effects and whether the aid amounts are adequate to reach this minimum level. 
Vendar pa večina držav članic ne preverja minimalne ravni sodelovanja, ki je potrebna, da bi se zagotovili pričakovani vplivi podukrepov na okolje, niti tega, ali so zneski pomoči ustrezni za doseganje te minimalne ravni.
In Poland, three basic sub-measures representing 75 % of the expenditure in 2008 were implemented on less than 1 % of the utilised agricultural areas of the regions visited by the Court. 
Na Poljskem so tri osnovne podukrepe, ki so pomenili 75 % odhodkov za leto 2008, izvedli na manj kot 1 % obdelanih kmetijskih površin v regijah, ki jih je obiskalo Sodišče.
No data is available to demonstrate that such coverage is important enough to result in environmental effects. 
Na voljo ni nobenih podatkov, ki bi dokazovali, da je tako zajetje dovolj pomembno, da povzroča vplive na okolje.
Despite the low coverage, the aid amounts for these sub-measures were kept significantly below (between 16 % and 44 %) the amounts calculated on the basis of additional costs and income foregone. 
Kljub majhnemu zajetju so bili zneski pomoči za te podukrepe močno pod (od 16 % do 44 %) zneski, izračunanimi na podlagi dodatnih stroškov in izgubljenega dohodka.
In other cases, aid amounts were increased despite the fact that the participation rate already fulfilled the planned targets. 
V drugih primerih so zneske pomoči zvišali, čeprav je raven sodelovanja že dosegla načrtovane ciljne vrednosti.
This led to situations such as in Sweden, which increased threefold the aid amount of one sub-measure despite the fact that the participation target had been reached. 36 Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
To je privedlo do položaja, kot na primer na Švedskem, kjer se je znesek pomoči za enega od podukrepov potrojil, čeprav je bilo ciljno sodelovanje že doseženo. 36 Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENT POLICY TAKE ACCOUNT OF SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS? 
ALI SE PRI VODENJU KMETIJSKO-OKOLJSKE POLITIKE UPOŠTEVAJO POSEBNE OKOLJSKE POTREBE?
Article 39(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 states that Member States should make support available for agri-environment payments throughout their territories in accordance with their specific needs. 
Člen 39(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1689/2005 določa, da bi morale države članice zagotoviti podporo za kmetijsko-okoljska plačila po vsem svojem ozemlju glede na posebne potrebe.
All rural development programmes audited show that the environmental pressures are more acute in some regions than in others. 
Vsi revidirani programi razvoja podeželja kažejo, da so pritiski na okolje v nekaterih regijah bolj pereči kot v drugih.
The Court reviewed to what extent agri-environmental aid takes account of environmental needs, whether available management tools such as geographical targeting and selection were used and also whether management was innovative and evidence-based. 
Sodišče je preverilo, koliko kmetijsko-okoljska pomoč upošteva okoljske potrebe, ali se uporabljajo razpoložljiva upravljavska orodja, kot sta ciljno usmerjanje po zemljepisnih območjih in izbirni postopki, ter ali je upravljanje inovativno in ali temelji na podatkih.
Finally, the Court reviewed whether the management of funds was focused on delivering environmental effects. 
Končno je Sodišče preverilo še, ali je bilo upravljanje sredstev usmerjeno v doseganje vplivov na okolje.
LIMITED USE OF TARGETING AND SELECTION PROCEDURES assessments of what wouLd be the right LeveL of geographicaL targeting are not avaiLabLe 72. 
OMEJENA UPORABA POSTOPKOV CILJNEGA USMERJANJA IN IZBIRNIH POSTOPKOV ocene, Katere bi lahKo bile prave ravni ciljnega usmerjanja po zemljepisnih območjih, niso na voljo 72.
Ensuring that funds are spent according to regional needs and priorities is of key importance for enhancing the environmental effects of agri-environment sub-measures. 
Zagotavljanje porabe sredstev v skladu z regionalnimi potrebami in prioritetami je izredno pomembno za krepitev vplivov kmetijsko-okoljskih podukrepov na okolje.
This can be achieved through targeting funds to geographical areas, types of farms or farming practices by setting appropriate eligibility criteria. 
Doseči jo je mogoče z usmerjanjem sredstev po zemljepisnih območjih, vrstah kmetij ali načinih kmetovanja, in sicer z določitvijo ustreznih meril za upravičenost.
Targeting of agri-environment payments has been a permanent issue over the last decade. 
Usmerjanje kmetijsko-okoljskih plačil je bilo v zadnjem desetletju ves čas nerešeno vprašanje.
In its special report from 2000 on ‘Greening the CAP’, the Court criticised the lack of targeting agri-environment schemes to environmental priorities (see Annex I for further details). 
Sodišče je v svojem posebnem poročilu iz leta 2000 Okoljsko ozaveščena skupna kmetijska politika kritiziralo pomanjkanje usmerjanja kmetijsko-okoljskih shem v okoljske prioritete (za podrobnosti glej Prilogo I).
Since then, several evaluations and studies 19 identified a need for improved targeting of agri-environment expenditure to identified needs. 
Po tistem je več vrednotenj in študij19 ugotavljalo, da obstaja potreba po boljšem ciljnem usmerjanju kmetijsko-okoljskih odhodkov v zadovoljevanje ugotovljenih potreb.
A recent report from the European Network for Rural Development 20 identified targeting as one of the nine key criteria for the successful delivery of outcomes. 
Nedavno poročilo Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja20 je ciljno usmerjanje opredelilo kot eno od devetih ključnih meril za uspešno doseganje izidov.