natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Paradoxically, although the success of Community control of FMD actually relies substantially on farmers themselves, as they are the first people able to note the physical condition of their livestock and to notify any diseases in the herd, the Community regulations did not require Member States to involve farmers in disease control, consult them over contingency plans, provide them with information about the nature of different animal diseases and immediate action to be taken, make them aware of their responsibilities or encourage them by some other means to notify the disease quickly. 
Paradoksalno je, da medtem ko je uspeh nadzora Skupnosti nad slinavko in parkljevko odvisen predvsem od rejcev samih, ki lahko prvi ugotovijo fizično stanje svoje živine in prijavijo bolezni, predpisi Skupnosti od držav članic ne zahtevajo, da rejce vključijo v sistem nadzora, se z njimi posvetujejo o načrtih ukrepov ob nepredvidljivih dogodkih, jih obvestijo o naravi različnih epidemij živalskih bolezni in izvedbi nujnih ukrepov, jih seznanijo z njihovimi odgovornostmi ali jih na kakršen koli drug način spodbudijo k hitri prijavi bolezni.
Following a detailed epidemiological enquiry national reference laboratory experts took the view that a certain livestock unit was the origin of the 2001 epidemic, but it had not informed (60) Inquiry into Infectious Diseases in Livestock, The Royal Society, visits to Cumbria and Galloway 1 and 2 November 2001. 
Leta 2001 rejec, za čigar gospodarstvo so izvedenci referenčnega državnega laboratorija po podrobni epidemiološki preiskavi ugotovili, da je izvor epidemije živalske bolezni, pristojnega organa Združenega kraljestva ni obvestil o okužbi svoje živine. (60) Inquiry into Infectious Diseases in Livestock, The Royal Society, visits to Cumbria and Galloway, 1. in 2. november 2001.
(61) Eurostat and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, year 2000. 
(61) Eurostat in Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, leto 2000.
(62) Foot-and-Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned Inquiry, Dr Iain Anderson, sections 9.2, 9.7 and 9.8. 
(62) Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned Inquiry, dr. Iain Anderson, odstavki 9.2, 9.7 in 9.8.
(63) The 2001 outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, National Audit Office, United Kingdom, 14 June 2002, p. 
(63) Report on the 2001 Outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease, odstavek 3.37, 14. junij 2002, National Audit Office, Združeno kraljestvo.
The disease was detected approximately one month after its appearance in another region, by which time, according to estimates made since then, there were already 57 contaminated holdings (64). 
Bolezen je bila odkrita približno en mesec po tem, ko se je pojavila v drugi regiji, medtem ko je bilo po odtlej opravljenih ocenah okuženih že 57 gospodarstev (64).
In the meantime (between 1 February 2001 and 21 February 2001), however, 49 796 head of livestock had been exported to the other Member States, increasing the risk of the epidemic spreading beyond the frontiers of the United Kingdom. 
Medtem (med 1. februarjem 2001 in 21. februarjem 2001) so v druge države članice izvozili 49 796 glav živine, kar je povečalo tveganje širjenja epidemije živalske bolezni prek meja Združenega kraljestva.
As regards the Member StateŐs notification to the Commission and the other Member States, it was essential that the latter be notified as early as possible during the crisis, so that they could take the necessary precautions. 
Bistveno je, da država članica med krizo, takoj ko je mogoče, o izbruhu bolezni obvesti Komisijo in druge države članice in jim s tem omogoči, da sprejmejo potrebne varnostne ukrepe.
This compulsory notification of the disease by the Member State concerned to the Commission and the other Member States is, moreover, a requirement (65). 
Poleg tega se od zadevne države članice zahteva obvezna prijava bolezni Komisiji in drugim državam članicam (65).
In the case of the first outbreak, however, it only has to be effected within 24 hours of the disease being confirmed on the basis of a test that is carried out by a specified national laboratory on samples taken from the animals. 
Vendar je država članica v primeru prvega izbruha dolžna prijaviti bolezen v 24 urah po njeni potrditvi na podlagi analize vzorcev, odvzetih na živalih, ki jo opravi poseben državni laboratorij.
This interval of 24 hours can thus be added to the time needed for carrying out the tests, even though scientific confirmation has been obtained. 
Ta 24-urni rok je torej mogoče prišteti k času, potrebnemu za izvedbo analiz, čeprav je bil pojav bolezni znanstveno že potrjen.
In order to offset this disadvantage the Council (66) gave the Commission the option of establishing a warning system, allowing any Member State affected by an epidemic to alert the Commission and the other Member States quickly to the occurrence of an outbreak of FMD. 
Svet (66) je, da bi odpravil to pomanjkljivost, Komisiji dal možnost, da pripravi sistem zgodnjega opozarjanja, ki bi državi članici, prizadeti zaradi epidemije živalske bolezni, omogočil hitro obveščanje Komisije in drugih držav članic o pojavu izbruha slinavke in parkljevke.
On 20 February, five hours after the national reference laboratory had officially confirmed the disease, the United Kingdom, in accordance with the provisions of the Community regulations, notified the Commission of the existence of the first outbreak, thus demonstrating that the 24-hour period allowed by the regulations could be shortened, given modern methods of communication. 
Združeno kraljestvo je 20. februarja, pet ur po tem, ko je referenčni državni laboratorij uradno potrdil pojav bolezni, v skladu s predpisi Skupnosti Komisijo obvestilo o prvem izbruhu, s čimer je pokazalo, da je mogoče 24-urni rok, določen v predpisih, skrajšati z uporabo sodobnih komunikacijskih sredstev.
The Commission then immediately informed the veterinary services in the other Member States and, on the following day, stopped exports from the United Kingdom. 
Komisija je nato takoj obvestila veterinarske službe drugih držav članic in naslednji dan prepovedala izvoze iz Združenega kraljestva.
In the intervening period around 287 pigs were still exported from Northern Ireland to the Irish Republic, before the export ban was actually implemented, at 17.00 hours on 21 February. 
V tem času je bilo, preden je prepoved izvoza 21. februarja ob 17. uri dejansko začela veljati, iz Severne Irske v Republiko Irsko izvoženih še okrog 287 prašičev.
Member States found that in some cases these aspects had been disregarded in their territories and took action against the farmers concerned in the courts. 
Države članice so na svojem ozemlju ugotovile kršitve na teh področjih in zadevne rejce postavile pred sodišče.
(64) Origin of the UK foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in 2001, DEFRA, United Kingdom, June 2002. 
(64) Vir: Origin of the UK Foot and Mouth Disease Epidemic in 2001, DEFRA, Združeno kraljestvo, junij 2002.
(65) Council Directive 82/894/EEC (OJ L 378, 31.12.1982, p. 
(65) Direktiva Sveta 82/894/EGS (UL L 378, 31.12.1982, str.
58), Article 3(1) requires Member States to notify the Commission and the Member States within 24 hours of an established primary outbreak on their territory of any of the diseases listed in Annex I to the Directive. 
58) v členu 3(1) od držav članic zahteva, da v štiriindvajsetih urah Komisijo in države članice obvestijo o pojavu primarnega izbruha ene od bolezni, navedenih v Prilogi I k Direktivi, ugotovljenem na njihovem ozemlju.
(66) Council Directive 90/423/EEC. 
(66) Direktiva 90/423/EGS.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/17 56. 
3.3.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 54/17 56.
In the United Kingdom and France farmers who did not notify the disease or respect the animal movement restrictions were taken to court by the Member States concerned and were fined. 
Rejci v Združenem kraljestvu in v Franciji, ki niso prijavili bolezni ali upoštevali omejitev premikov živali, so bili postavljeni pred zadevna sodišča držav članic, kjer so bili obsojeni na plačilo denarnih kazni.
These farmers were entitled to full compensation because the Community provisions did not make the payment of compensation conditional on compliance with essential aspects of the control provisions, such as disease notification and observance of movement restrictions (67). 
Ker določbe predpisov Skupnosti kot pogoj za izplačilo niso postavljale izpolnjevanja bistvenih pogojev sistema nadzora, kot so prijava bolezni in upoštevanje omejitev premikov, so bili ti rejci upravičeni do celotnega nadomestila (67).
The absence of such provisions made it possible for the Member States to claim back from the Commission the amounts that they had paid to those farmers (see paragraph 77). 
Države članice so zato lahko od Komisije zahtevale zneske, ki so jih plačale rejcem (glej odstavek 77).
Delays in culling 57. 
Roki za zakol 57.
In order to be entitled to Community reimbursement Member States must immediately slaughter infected animals, as required by Directive 85/511/EEC, as soon as the disease is officially confirmed. 
Države članice morajo takoj po uradni potrditvi bolezni začeti zakol okuženih živali, ki jim ga nalaga Direktiva 85/511/EGS, da so potem upravičene do povračila Skupnosti.
Immediate slaughter is essential, to prevent the spread of the virus. 
Takojšnji zakol je bistven za preprečevanje širjenja virusa.
In the case of secondary outbreaks, however, the Community regulations allow, but do not require, Member States to slaughter animals, if the epidemic spreads, as soon as clinical symptoms of the disease are detected by an official veterinarian. 
Vendar predpisi Skupnosti v primeru sekundarnih izbruhov državam članicam omogočajo, ne da bi jim nalagali, da v primeru širjenja epidemije živalske bolezni živali zakoljejo, ko pooblaščeni veterinar odkrije klinične znake bolezni.
Furthermore, they do not require animals to be culled before they have been valued and the relevant administrative procedures completed. 
Poleg tega tudi ne nalagajo zakola živali pred ocenitvijo njihove vrednosti in zaključkom s tem povezanih upravnih postopkov.
In consequence culling was more or less rapid according to the practice of the Member State and the veterinary resources available (see Box 3), thereby increasing the risk of the epidemic spreading. 
Iz tega sledi, da so bili zakoli opravljeni bolj ali manj hitro, glede na prakse držav članic in razpoložljivo veterinarsko osebje (glej okvir 3), kar je povečalo tveganje širjenja epidemije živalske bolezni.
Box 3 Culling delays in Member States In the United Kingdom, as allowed by the Community regulations, the responsible authority waited for laboratory confirmation of infection before culling the animals from the first outbreak: in the meantime three other outbreaks had occurred. 
Okvir 3 Roki za zakol v državah članicah Pristojni organ v Združenem kraljestvu je v skladu s predpisi Skupnosti čakal, da laboratorij potrdi okužbo, preden se je lotil zakola živali na kraju prvega izbruha: v tem času so se pojavili trije novi izbruhi.
In the case of the first 100 outbreaks the interval between confirmation of contamination and slaughter was, in most instances, more than 24 hours and could be up to seven days. 
Pri prvih stotih izbruhih je med potrditvijo okužbe in zakolom v večini primerov preteklo štiriindvajset ur, včasih tudi do sedem dni.
The United Kingdom subsequently took the appearance of clinical symptoms as the basis for culling. 
Združeno kraljestvo se je pozneje lotilo zakola na podlagi kliničnih znakov okužbe.
In 78 % of such cases subsequent tests confirmed the vetsŐ diagnosis (see NAO report, Table 38, p. 
Poznejša analiza je v 78 % teh primerov potrdila diagnozo veterinarjev (glej Poročilo Nacionalnega revizijskega urada (National Audit Office), tabela 38, str.
(67) Only the Netherlands had made provision for up to 100 % of the compensation paid to farmers to be deducted if health or veterinary regulations had been infringed. 
(67) Samo Nizozemska je predvidela, da se v primeru kršitve veterinarskih in zdravstvenih predpisov odbije do 100 % nadomestil, izplačanih rejcem.
The infringements in question were failure to comply with animal identification systems (75 %) and hygiene rules (18 %) and obstructing the killing of vaccinated animals, they did not concern notification and compliance with movement restrictions. 
Te kršitve niso zadevale niti prijave bolezni niti upoštevanja omejitev gibanja, temveč neupoštevanje sistemov identifikacije živali (75 %) in higienskih pravil (18 %) ter oviranje zakola cepljenih živali.
However in view of the difficulties suffered by the persons concerned, the Dutch authorities cancelled the penalties ex post facto. 
Vendar so nizozemske oblasti pozneje zaradi težav, ki so jih imeli zadevni rejci, te kazni ukinile.
In the other Member States, on the other hand, slaughter took place as soon as an outbreak was suspected, before the final results of laboratory tests were received. 
Nasprotno so bile v drugih državah članicah živali na krajih izbruha zaklane, ko se je pojavil sum in preden so bili znani končni rezultati laboratorijskih analiz.
In the Netherlands, France and Ireland preventive culls were carried out, especially in the case of sheep imported from the United Kingdom. 
Na Nizozemskem, v Franciji in na Irskem so preventivno zaklali, zlasti ovce, uvožene iz Združenega kraljestva.
In the United Kingdom animals were killed after they had been valued and after the valuation had been accepted by the farmer, thus delaying slaughter of infected animals. 
V Združenem kraljestvu so živali zaklali, potem ko so ocenili njihovo vrednost in je rejec to oceno sprejel, s čimer so zakasnili zakol okuženih živali.
In France, on the other hand, animals were valued after slaughter, so as not to delay eradication of the infection. COMMISSION ACTION CONCERNING THE REIMBURSEMENT SYSTEM 59. 
Nasprotno so v Franciji vrednost živali ocenili po njihovem zakolu, da ne bi zavlačevali z izkoreninjenjem epidemije živalske bolezni.
Before the crisis the Court and the discharge authorities had already made recommendations to the Commission, some of them coinciding with the HVO findings mentioned in paragraph 46. 
Sodišče in organi, ki sprejmejo sklep o razrešitvi, so pred začetkom krize Komisijo seznanili s priporočili, od katerih so se nekatera ujemala z ugotovitvami Urada za prehrano in veterinarstvo, navedenimi v odstavku 46.
In the financial area the Commission did not take advantage of the recommendations made by the Court in 1996, nor those made by the discharge authority in connection with classical swine fever and BSE - it did not adapt them to the FMD situation (see Box 4). 
Komisija na finančnem področju ni izkoristila priporočil, ki jih je Sodišče oblikovalo leta 1996, niti tistih, ki so jih organi, ki sprejmejo sklep o razrešitvi, oblikovali v zvezi s prašičjo kugo in BSE, da bi jih prilagodila za primer slinavke in parkljevke (glej okvir 4).
Box 4 Commission follow-up to previous recommendations by the Court and the discharge authority Clarify the rules and procedures relating to eligibility of Member StatesŐ expenditure and compensation payments to farmers (Special Report No 1/2000, paragraph 80): in reply to the follow-up to the CourtŐs 1995 Annual Report the Commission undertook to address directives to the Member States on compensation procedures and calculation of the amounts involved; this was not done. 
Okvir 4 Kako je Komisija upoštevala priporočila Sodišča in organa za razrešnico Natančno določiti pravila in postopke na področju upravičenosti izdatkov držav članic in nadomestil za rejce (Posebno poročilo št. 1/2000, odstavek 80): Komisija se je v odgovor na letno poročilo Sodišča iz leta 1995 obvezala, da bo državam članicam sporočila smernice glede postopkov in izračuna nadomestil; to ni bilo storjeno.
Align the cofinancing rates applicable to veterinary measures and market support measures (Special Report No 1/2000, paragraph 79); the Commission undertook to do this for classical swine fever; however, the cofinancing rates still vary according to the nature of the animal disease. 
Uskladiti stopnje financiranja, ki se uporabljajo za veterinarske ukrepe in ukrepe za podporo trga (Posebno poročilo št. 1/2000, odstavek 79): Komisija se je obvezala, da bo to storila za primer prašičje kuge; vendar se stopnje sofinanciranja še vedno spreminjajo glede na naravo živalskih bolezni.
Submit to the Council a proposal for reviewing the regulations so as to increase the contributions from owners of intensive pig units to measures to combat the disease (Special Report No 1/2000, paragraph 81): the Commission carried out a comparative study of other forms of financing but did nothing towards the introduction of systems in the Member States involving farmersŐ contributions for FMD. 
Predložiti Svetu predlog revizije predpisov, da bi povečali prispevek lastnikov gospodarstev z intenzivno rejo prašičev k ukrepom za nadzor bolezni (Posebno poročilo št.
C 54/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 No Commission proposals for directives on procedures and calculation of compensation for farmers by Member States 60. 
C 54/18 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 3.3.2005 Komisija ni predlagala direktiv v zvezi s postopki, po katerih države članice izračunavajo in izplačujejo nadomestila kmetom določijo same.
The rules (68) give the Commission the task of adopting the necessary implementing measures as regards the special Community financial contribution for eradicating FMD. 
Predpisi (68) Komisiji nalagajo, da sprejme potrebne izvedbene ukrepe glede posebnega finančnega prispevka Komisije za izkoreninjenje slinavke in parkljevke.
It makes the Community reimbursement of expenditure to Member States conditional on Ôadequate compensation of the livestock farmersŐ, but without specifying the meaning of the expression. 
Predpisi določajo, da je pogoj za povračilo Skupnosti za izdatke držav članic zlasti „ustrezno nadomestilo“ za rejce, ne da bi natančno določili, kaj ta izraz pomeni.
In December 2000 the Council (69) made the Commission alone responsible for direct management of this expenditure. 
Svet (69) se je decembra 2000 odločil, da je za neposredno upravljanje teh izdatkov odgovorna samo Komisija.
Paradoxically, although the Commission undertook to present directives containing the arrangements for compensating farmers in the Member States, it considers that it is not legally competent to do so. 
Paradoksalno je, da Komisija, čeprav se je obvezala, da bo predložila direktive o oblikovanju sistema za izplačilo nadomestil rejcem v državah članicah, meni, da za to ni pravno pristojna.
The regulations are incomplete as a consequence, in as far as the Commission has not presented the directives. 
Zato ostajajo predpisi nepopolni, dokler ne bo Komisija predložila teh direktiv.
On the basis of the current legal arrangements the Commission confines itself to determining whether Member StatesŐ expenditure is eligible for Community reimbursement, without providing the framework for their calculation of the compensation to be paid to their farmers. 
Komisija se na podlagi sedanjega pravnega sistema omejuje na to, da ugotavlja, ali so izdatki držav članic upravičeni do povračila Skupnosti, ne da bi določila okvir za izračun nadomestil, ki se izplačajo rejcem.
On the other hand, in the context of compulsory slaughter of cattle affected by BSE (70), the Commission set limits on the amount of compensation to be paid to farmers by the Member States (71). 
Nasprotno je Komisija v primeru obveznih zakolov goveda, prizadetega zaradi BSE (70), določila mejo zneska nadomestil, ki jih države članice izplačajo rejcem (71).
The latter are authorised to pay the objective current market value for each animal, established on the basis of a system of objective individual evaluation approved by them. Even if this system does not entirely meet the wish for a harmonised, fair and economic compensation system, it is still preferable to (68) Council Decision 90/424/EEC, Articles 3 and 11(2). 
Dovoljeno jim je, da za vsako žival plačajo tekočo objektivno tržno vrednost, določeno na podlagi sistema objektivne individualne ocene, ki ga (68) Odločba 90/424/EGS, člen 3 in člen 11(2).
(69) Council Decision 2001/12/EC of 19 December 2000 amending Decision 90/424/EEC on expenditure in the veterinary field (OJ L 3, 6.1.2001, p. 
(69) Odločba Sveta 2001/12/ES z dne 19. decembra 2000 o spremembi Odločbe 90/424/EGS o izdatkih na področju veterine (UL L 3, 6.1.2001, str.
(70) In the case of BSE the compensation payments to farmers for compulsory slaughter of cattle are still managed by the Directorate-General for Agriculture. 
(70) Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo še naprej upravlja nadomestila, ki se rejcem izplačajo za obvezni zakol goveda v primeru goveje spongiformne encefalopatije.
The division of responsibilities for animal disease management between the Directorate General for Health and Consumer Protection and the Directorate General for Agriculture is due to historical reasons. 
Razlogi za delitev pristojnosti na področju upravljanja živalskih bolezni med Generalnim direktoratom za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov ter Generalnim direktoratom za kmetijstvo so zgodovinski.
Transferring the compulsory selective slaughter programmes from ÔGuarantee Ń marketsŐ to ÔGuarantee Ń veterinaryŐ has been mentioned, but the associated manpower problems within the Commission have yet to be resolved. 
Omenjen je bil prenos programov obveznega selektivnega zakola z Jamstvenega sklada – podpora trga na Jamstveni sklad – veterinarstvo, vendar je še vedno treba rešiti težave z osebjem znotraj Komisije.
(71) Commission Regulation (EC) No 164/97 (OJ L 29, 8.1.1997, p. 
164/97 (UL L 29, 31.1.1997, str.
This Regulation is based on Article 37 of the Treaty, concerning the common agricultural policy, and on Council Decision 90/424/EEC on expenditure in the veterinary field. the absence of any definition of compensation from Member States to farmers which prevails in the area of FMD. 
Ta uredba temelji na členu 37 Pogodbe, ki zadeva skupno kmetijsko politiko, in Odločbi 90/424/EGS o izdatkih na področju veterine.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/19 system (73), which contains important data relating to the value of animals (breed, age, sex), was not used by valuers to determine cattle values, leaving them a good deal of latitude. 
3.3.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 54/19 goveda (73), ki vsebuje pomembne podatke glede vrednosti živali (pasma, starost, spol), zaradi česar so imeli pri ocenjevanju več svobode.
The identity of cattle was not included in the valuation forms and there was no trace of valuations having been reviewed by senior valuers or by the ministry. 
Identifikacija goveda ni bila navedena na ocenjevalnih obrazcih in nič ni kazalo, da so ocene pregledali višji ocenjevalci ali ministrstvo.
The systems adopted by Member States are described in Box 5. 
Sistemi, ki so jih sprejele države članice, so navedeni v okviru 5.
Box 5 Compensation systems introduced by Member States The compensation system chosen by the United Kingdom, Ireland and the Netherlands was based on the value of the animals, excluding indirect losses, whereas France included the latter, thus supplementing the animal value by around 30 %. 
Okvir 5 Sistemi poplačevanja nadomestil, ki so jih uvedle države članice Združeno kraljestvo, Irska in Nizozemska so se odločili za sistem poplačila nadomestil, ki temelji na vrednosti živali, in izključili izgube iz poslovanja, medtem ko jih je Francija vključila, kar predstavlja 30-odstotno povečanje vrednosti živali.
In the United Kingdom the system fluctuated between one where valuers alone assessed the value of the animals and a mixed system where farmers could opt for either a valuation based on a standard rate card or a value set by the valuers. 
V Združenem kraljestvu je sistem nihal med oceno vrednosti živali, ki so jo opravili samo ocenjevalci, in mešanim sistemom, v katerem so se kmeti lahko odločili med oceno na podlagi tabele cen in oceno, ki so jo opravili ocenjevalci.