natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One of the plants was overloaded (52 % of the waste received was directly sent to landfill without treatment). The second one did not reach the biodegradable waste recovery target set in its technical design and, as a result, waste was landfilled with a high content of biodegradable matter (see Box 4). 
Eden je bil preobremenjen (52 % odpadkov je bilo poslanih neposredno na odlagališče brez obdelave), drugi pa ni dosegel ciljnega deleža izločenih biološko razgradljivih odpadkov, kot je bilo določeno v tehnološkem projektu, zato so bili odpadki z velikim deležem biološko razgradljivih snovi odloženi na odlagališče (glej okvir 4).
ALMOST ALL INFRASTRUCTURES MET ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, BUT MORE THAN TWO THIRDS OF LANDFILLS LACKED THE REQUIRED FINANCIAL SECURITY FOR CLOSURE AND AFTER-CARE COSTS 29. 
SKORAJ VSI OBJEKTI SO IZPOLNJEVALI OKOLJSKE ZAHTEVE, VENDAR VEČ KOT DVE TRETJINI ODLAGALIŠČ NISTA IMELI ZAGOTOVLJENIH POTREBNIH SREDSTEV ZA ZAPRTJE IN UPRAVLJANJE PO ZAPRTJU 29.
For 25 of the 26 waste management infrastructures selected, the Court’s review of data indicated that environmental impacts on air, water and soil were generally monitored. 
Pri pregledu Sodišča je bilo ugotovljeno, da se v 25 od 26 izbranih objektov za gospodarjenje z odpadki v glavnem spremljajo okoljski vplivi na zrak, vodo in tla.
Projects complied in most cases with their respective permits. 
Projekti so bili v večini primerov skladni s svojimi dovoljenji.
One plant was not yet in operation at the time of the audit (see paragraph 26). Special Report No 20/2012 – Is structural measures funding for municipal waste management infrastructure projects effective in helping Member States achieve EU waste policy objectives? 
En obrat v času revizije še ni obratoval (glej odstavek 26). Posebno poročilo št. 20/2012 – Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki?
30. 
23 30.
However, at the time of the audit, in two of the seven selected landfills, gas resulting from the decomposition of biodegradable waste deposited was not collected and treated or flared, as required by the landfill directive (see Box 5). 
Vendar v času revizije se na dveh od sedmih izbranih odlagališč plin, ki nastaja pri razgradnji biološko razgradljivih odpadkov, ni zbiral in ob-deloval ali sežigal, kot se zahteva v direktivi o odlagališčih (glej okvir 5).
Uncontrolled landfill gas can pollute the atmosphere, affect vegetation and cause explosions. 
Nekontroliran odlagališčni plin lahko onesnaži ozračje, vpliva na vege-tacijo in povzroča eksplozije.
The Court also noted problems regarding the applicable limits for odour emissions set out in the national environmental permits in one third of the infrastructures, at least during certain periods of their operation. 
Sodišče je pri tretjini objektov vsaj v nekaterih obdobjih njihovega obratovanja odkrilo tudi probleme v zvezi z veljavnimi omejitvami za emisije vonjav, določenimi v nacionalnih okoljskih dovoljenih.
A lack of monitoring with regard to odours was noted in another third of the selected infrastructures. 
Pomanjkanje spremljanja emisij vonjav je bilo opaženo v še eni tretjini izbranih objektov.
Two of the plants failing to monitor odour levels were at the same time in receipt of EU co-financing for complementary works to deal with odour problems. 
Dva od objektov, ki niso spremljali ravni vonjav, sta bila obenem prejemnika sofinanciranja EU za dodatna dela za obvladovanje problemov z vonjavami.
The gas generated as a result of the decomposition of biodegradable matter was being released into the atmosphere without being treated or flared as the construction of the infrastructure for gas collection had not been completed. 
Plin, ki je nastajal pri razgradnji biološko razgradljivih snovi, se je sproščal v ozračje, ne da bi bil obdelan ali sežgan, saj objekt za zbiranje plina še ni bil končan.
In a landfill in Romania (Piatra Neamt), almost 2 years after starting operation, the Court noted that no landfill gas collection system was either in place, under construction or being planned. 
Sodišče je na nekem odlagališču v Romuniji (Piatra Neamt) skoraj dve leti po začetku obratovanja ugotovilo, da nima sistema za zbiranje odlagališčnega plina ter da se tak sistem niti ne gradi niti ne načrtuje.
These two landfills received a significant amount of biodegradable waste as a result of a lack of or deficient treatment prior to disposal, which made the collection and treatment or flaring of gas even more relevant in order to safeguard the atmosphere. Special Report No 20/2012 – Is structural measures funding for municipal waste management infrastructure projects effective in helping Member States achieve EU waste policy objectives? 
Ti dve odlagališči sta prevzemali precejšnjo količino biološko razgradljivih odpadkov, ker odpadki pred odstranjevanjem niso bili obdelani ali pa so bili pomanjkljivo obdelani, zato so bili zbiranje in obdelava ali sežiganje plina še pomembnejši za varovanje ozračja. Posebno poročilo št. 20/2012 – Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki?
However, half of the infrastructures which had problems with odour management did not change their operational processes or make complementary investments to solve such problems (see Box 6). 
Vendar polovica objektov, ki so imeli probleme z obvladovanjem vonjav, ni spremenila svojih delovnih procesov niti izvedla dodatnih naložb za reševanje teh problemov (glej okvir 6).
The potential impacts on the environment resulting from the operation of landfill sites are not limited to the operational period of the infrastructure, as potential leachate infiltrations and landfill gas emissions last for decades after waste disposal has finished. 
Morebitni vplivi na okolje, ki so posledica obratovanja odlagališč, niso omejeni na obdobje obratovanja objektov, saj morebitno proni-canje izcednih vod in odlagališčni plini lahko trajajo še desetletja po prenehanju odlaganja odpadkov.
For this reason, the landfill directive requires the setting aside of amounts to cover closure and after-care costs for a period of at least 30 years. 
Zato se v direktivi o odlagališčih zahteva zagotovitev sredstev za zaprtje in upravljanje po zaprtju za vsaj 30 let.
However, five of the seven selected landfills lacked a sufficient financial security for this purpose. 
Vendar pet od sedmih izbranih odlagališč ni imelo zagotovljenih potrebnih finančnih sredstev za ta namen.
In these cases, the amounts actually deposited, regardless of the methodology for their calculation, are not sufficient to ensure that appropriate funding will be available, once landfills cease operation, to prevent long-term threats to the environment such as the pollution of groundwater by leachate infiltration into the soil or the pollution of the atmosphere by landfill gas emissions. 
V teh primerih deponirani zneski ne glede na metodologijo za njihov izračun ne zagotavljajo, da bodo po prenehanju obratovanja odlagališč na voljo potrebna sredstva za preprečevanje dolgoročne nevarnosti za okolje, kot sta onesnaženje podtalnice s pronicanjem izcednih vod v tla ali onesnaženje ozračja z emisijami odlagališčnega plina.
24 BOX 6 EXAMPLES OF WAYS TO DIMINISH ODOUR PROBLEMS In two composting/anaerobic digestion plants (Valorsul, Portugal and Gironés, Spain) odour problems were noted by independent monitoring. 
OKVIR 6 PRIMERI NAČINOV ZA ZMANJŠANJE PROBLEMOV Z VONJAVAMI V dveh kompostarnah / objektih za anaerobno razgradnjo (VALORSUL, Portugalska in Gironés, Španija) so bili problemi z vonjavami ugotovljeni z neodvisnim spremljanjem.
To tackle this situation the operators implemented changes in the operation process, such as modifying the schedule and timing of the turning of the compost, or in the maintenance of, for example, the biofilters. 
Upravitelja sta zaradi reševanja tega problema v obratovalni proces uvedla spremembe, kot je na primer sprememba urnika in ure obračanja komposta ali vzdrževanja biofiltrov.
A reporting system was implemented in one of the plants to allow residents to complain of unpleasant odours by SMS to the operator. 
V enem objektu je bil uveden sistem poročanja, ki okoliškim prebivalcem omogoča, da s sporočilom SMS upravitelju pošljejo pritožbo zaradi neprijetnih vonjav.
In two of the landfills in Portugal (Residouro and Baixo Tâmega) complaints about odour problems were registered during the first years of operation. Deodorant emission systems were installed which were activated when necessary. Special Report No 20/2012 – Is structural measures funding for municipal waste management infrastructure projects effective in helping Member States achieve EU waste policy objectives? 
Na dveh odlagališčih na Portugalskem (RESIDOURO in Baixo Tâmega) so v prvih letih obratovanja dobivali pritožbe zaradi problemov z vonjavami, Namestili so sisteme za odstranjevanje neprijetnih vonjav, ki so jih po potrebi aktivirali. Posebno poročilo št. 20/2012 – Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki?
The Court also noted significant differences in the methodologies in place in the regions to determine the amount of the financial security, resulting in very different amounts (ranging from 370 000 euro to 4 180 000 euro for a landfill with a capacity about 1,4 million m3). 
Sodišče je opazilo tudi precejšnje razlike v metodologijah za določanje zneska potrebnih sredstev, ki se uporabljajo v različnih regijah, zato so ti zneski zelo različni (od 370 000 EUR do 4 180 000 EUR za odlagališče z zmogljivostjo okoli 1,4 milijona m3).
These methodologies do not provide satisfactory assurance that sufficient funding will be available to cover closure and after-care costs for a period of 30 years. 
Te metodologije ne dajejo zadovoljivega zagotovila, da bo na voljo dovolj sredstev za zaprtje in upravljanje po zaprtju za 30 let.
In some cases the financial security was determined by the cost of the landfill infrastructure, whereas in others the amount was set taking into account the capacity of the landfill, its surface or the tonnes deposited. 
V nekaterih primerih so bila potrebna sredstva določena glede na vrednost odlagališča, v drugih primerih pa je bil znesek določen z upoštevanjem zmogljivosti odlagališča, njegove površine ali količine odloženih odpadkov.
HAVE EU WASTE POLICY OBJECTIVES BEEN ACHIEVED AT REGIONAL LEVEL? 
ALI SO BILI CILJI POLITIKE EU GLEDE GOSPODARJENJA Z ODPADKI DOSEŽENI NA REGIONALNI RAVNI?
Structural measures funding for municipal waste infrastructures should help the beneficiary regions to meet the waste policy objectives set in EU directives. 
Financiranje objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov bi moralo upravičenim regijam pomagati pri doseganju ciljev, določenih v direktivah EU.
In particular, municipal waste prevention should be encouraged, regions should be increasing their separate collection rate so that they can contribute to achieving EU targets11 for recycling and recovery, and the reliance on final disposal in landfills should be reduced. 
Zlasti bi bilo treba spodbujati preprečevanje nastajanja komunalnih odpadkov, regije bi morale večati delež ločeno zbranih odpadkov, da bi lahko prispevale k doseganju ciljnih vrednosti EU11 za recikliranje in predelavo, poleg tega pa bi bilo treba zmanjšati zanašanje na končno odlaganje na odlagališča.
The Court examined whether: (a) the situation regarding the prevention of municipal waste was improving in the regions sampled; (b) regions had increased their separate collection rate, contributed to meeting EU targets for specific waste streams and reduced their reliance on landfilling; (c) illegal dumps had been eradicated and waste was being pre-treated before disposal in landfills. 25 Special Report No 20/2012 – Is structural measures funding for municipal waste management infrastructure projects effective in helping Member States achieve EU waste policy objectives? 
Sodišče je preučilo: (a) ali se v regijah v vzorcu stanje v zvezi s preprečevanjem nastanka komunalnih odpadkov izboljšuje; (b) ali so regije povečale delež ločeno zbranih odpadkov, prispevale k doseganju ciljnih vrednosti EU za posamezne tokove odpadkov in zmanjšale svoje zanašanje na odlaganje na odlagališča; (c) ali so bila nezakonita odlagališča odpravljena in ali se odpadki pred odlaganjem na odlagališče obdelajo. Posebno poročilo št. 20/2012 – Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki?
26 INCONSISTENT DATA REPORTING 37. 
26 NEDOSLEDNO SPOROČANJE PODATKOV 37.
Following its visits to eight regions in the four Member States sampled, the Court noted some inconsistencies regarding the reporting of the achievement of EU targets. 
Sodišče je po obisku osmih regij v štirih državah članicah v vzorcu ugotovilo nekatere nedoslednosti v zvezi s poročanjem o doseganju ciljnih vrednosti EU.
Data reported to the Commission could not always be reconciled with the figures available in Member States. 
Podatkov, sporočenih Komisiji, ni bilo vedno mogoče uskladiti s podatki, ki so na voljo v državah članicah.
Such inconsistencies can make it difficult for the Commission to assess whether EU waste targets are actually being achieved (see Box 7). 
Te nedoslednosti lahko Komisiji otežijo oceno tega, ali se ciljne vrednosti EU za odpadke dejansko dosegajo (glej okvir 7).
The Commission checks the consistency of figures received, but does not assess their reliability. 
Komisija preverja doslednost prejetih podatkov, vendar ne ocenjuje njihove zanesljivosti.
Moreover, the Commission does not compile information on the contribution of the regions to achieving EU targets despite the fact that, in six of the eight regions visited, waste management plans which take into account EU targets are prepared at regional level. 
Poleg tega Komisija ne zbira nobenih podatkov o prispevku regij k doseganju ciljnih vrednosti EU, čeprav se v šestih od osmih obiskanih regij načrti za gospodarjenje z odpadki, pri katerih se upoštevajo ciljne vrednosti EU, pripravljajo na regionalni ravni.
Reporting at national level can mask major disparities in waste management performance within a Member State, as was the case for Andalucía and Puglia when compared with the overall situation in Spain and Italy respectively. 
Poročanje na nacionalni ravni lahko prikrije velike razlike v uspešnosti pri gospodarjenju z odpadki v državi članici, kot je bilo pri Andaluziji in Apuliji v primerjavi s splošnim stanjem v Španiji oz. Italiji.
BOX 7 EXAMPLES OF CASES WHERE IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO RECONCILE DATA IN MEMBER STATES WITH DATA REPORTED TO THE COMMISSION In Spain, in relation to the achievement of the landfill directive target, the Ministry of the Environment is responsible for consolidating the data from the regions and reporting to the Commission. 
OKVIR 7 PRIMERI, V KATERIH NI BILO MOGOČE USKLADITI PODATKOV V DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH S PODATKI, SPOROČENIMI KOMISIJI V Španiji je v zvezi z doseganjem ciljnih vrednosti iz direktive o odlagališčih ministrstvo za okolje odgovorno za uskladitev podatkov iz regij in njihovo sporočanje Komisiji.
Andalucía reported, the quantity of biodegradable waste landfilled in 2009 as being 500 000 tonnes, whereas based on data obtained during the audit the Court estimated that the quantity should have been approximately 1 800 000 tonnes. 
Andaluzija je poročala, da je leta 2009 na odlagališča odložila 500 000 ton biološko razgradljivih odpadkov, Sodišče pa je na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je dobilo med revizijo, ocenilo, da je bila dejanska količina približno 1 800 000 ton.
As a result, in 2009 Spain landfilled 58 % of the biodegradable waste produced in 1995, and not 47 % as reported to the Commission, and failed to meet the landfill target for the year set at 50 %. 
Tako je Španija leta 2009 na odlagališča odložila 58 % biološko razgradljivih odpadkov, povzročenih leta 1995, in ne 47 %, kot je poročala Komisiji, ter tako ni dosegla ciljne vrednosti za odlagališča za to leto, ki je znašala 50 %.
In Portugal, where no data were available at regional level on the achievement of the targets set in EU directives, data reported at national level to the Commission showed compliance with the landfill directive for 2006 as well as with the packaging directive for 2005. 
Na Portugalskem, kjer na regionalni ravni ni bilo na voljo nobenih podatkov o doseganju ciljnih vrednosti iz direktiv EU, so nacionalni podatki, sporočeni Komisiji, pokazali skladnost z direktivo o odlagališčih za leto 2006 in direktivo o embalaži za leto 2005.
However, data obtained during the audit indicated that the landfill directive target for 2006 was narrowly missed and that the packaging directive targets for 2005 were missed in respect of the recycling of plastic packaging (by 46,95 %). Special Report No 20/2012 – Is structural measures funding for municipal waste management infrastructure projects effective in helping Member States achieve EU waste policy objectives? 
Vendar so med revizijo pridobljeni podatki pokazali, da ciljna vrednost iz direktive o odlagališčih za leto 2006 ni bila dosežena, čeprav ni veliko manjkalo, in da niso bile dosežene niti ciljne vrednosti za recikliranje plastične embalaže iz direktive o embalaži za leto 2005 (manjkalo je 46,95 %). Posebno poročilo št. 20/2012 – Ali financiranje projektov za izgradnjo objektov za gospodarjenje s komunalnimi odpadki v okviru strukturnih ukrepov uspešno pomaga državam članicam pri doseganju ciljev politike EU glede gospodarjenja z odpadki?
27 THE GENERATION OF WASTE INCREASED IN SIX OF THE REGIONS SAMPLED 39. 
27 KOLIČINA ODPADKOV SE JE POVEČALA V ŠESTIH REGIJAH V VZORCU 39.
Contrary to the trend observed for the EU-27 average, which shows that despite continuous economic growth until 2008 municipal waste generation has stabilised at around 520 kg/capita, since 2000 per capita waste generation increased in six of the regions sampled. 
Čeprav je splošni trend za povprečje v EU-27 pokazal, da se je povzročanje komunalnih odpadkov kljub stalni gospodarski rasti do leta 2008 po letu 2000 ustalilo na približno 520 kg na prebivalca, se je povzročanje odpadkov na prebivalca povečalo v šestih regijah v vzorcu.
In the two remaining regions, Sardinia and Catalonia, it stabilised. 
V preostalih dveh regijah, in sicer na Sardiniji in v Kataloniji, pa se je ustalilo.
In 2009 the per capita waste generation in half of the regions sampled exceeded the EU-27 average as well as the average of the respective Member State, while this was not the case in 2000 for any of the regions sampled. 
Leta 2009 je povzročanje odpadkov na prebivalca v polovici regij preseglo povprečje v EU-27 in tudi povprečje ustrezne države članice, kar leta 2000 ni veljalo za nobeno regijo v vzorcu.
ONLY ONE QUARTER OF THE REGIONS SAMPLED SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THEIR SEPARATE COLLECTION RATE, REDUCED THEIR RELIANCE ON LANDFILLING AND CONTRIBUTED TO MEETING EU TARGETS 40. 
SAMO ČETRTINA REGIJ V VZORCU JE MOČNO POVEČALA LOČENO ZBIRANJE ODPADKOV, ZMANJŠALA ZANAŠANJE NA ODLAGANJE NA ODLAGALIŠČA TER PRISPEVALA K DOSEGANJU CILJNIH VREDNOSTI EU 40.
Only two of the regions selected, Sardinia and Catalonia, made significant progress with separate collection and diversion from landfill. 
Samo dve izbrani regiji, in sicer Sardinija in Katalonija, sta precej napredovali pri ločenem zbiranju odpadkov in njihovem preusmerjanju z odlagališč.
The Court noted an increase in the separate collection rate for Sardinia from 2 % in 2000 to 43 % in 2009 and for Catalonia from 13 % to 38 % over the same period. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo povečanje ločenega zbiranja odpadkov na Sardiniji z 2 % leta 2000 na 43 % leta 2009 in v Kataloniji s 13 % na 38 % v istem obdobju.
There was also a resulting decrease in municipal waste landfilling over the same period from 74 % to 23 % for Sardinia and from 64 % to 39 % for Catalonia (see Figure 4)15. 
V istem obdobju se je zato zmanjšalo tudi odlaganje komunalnih odpadkov na odlagališča s 74 % na 23 % za Sardinijo in s 64 % na 39 % za Katalonijo (glej diagram 4)15.
In these two regions a reduction of waste landfilled in kilograms per capita was observed, whereas this indicator remained almost stable or increased in the other six regions sampled (see Figure 5). 
V teh dveh regijah je bilo ugotovljeno zmanjšanje količine odpadkov, odloženih na odlagališča, v kilogramih na prebivalca, medtem ko je ta kazalnik ostal skoraj nespremenjen ali pa se je povišal v preostalih šestih regijah v vzorcu (glej diagram 5).
15 The analysis of the results achieved by the region Sud-Vest in Romania is influenced by the lack of reliability of waste management databases available in the Member State, especially in relation to the separate collection rate. 
15 Na analizo rezultatov, ki jih je dosegla regija Sud-Vest v Romuniji, je vplivala nezanesljivost podatkovnih zbirk o gospodarjenju z odpadki, ki so bile na voljo v državi članici, zlasti v zvezi z ravnijo ločenega zbiranja odpadkov.
28 FIGURE 4 EVOLUTION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE SEPARATE COLLECTION AND LANDFILL RATES IN THE REGIONS SAMPLED BETWEEN 2000 AND 20091 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 ES-Catalonia IT-Sardinia Evolution separate collection rate PT-Norte PT-LVT RO-Nord-Est Evolution landfill rate RO-Sud-Vest IT-Puglia ES-Andalucía 1 For the region Nord-Est in Romania the landfill rate covers waste collected for the period 2003–09 and the separate collection 2004–09; for Andalucía the separate collection rate refers to the period 2002–08; and for the region Sud-Vest the landfill of waste collected and separate collection rates correspond to the period 2006–09. 
ODPADKI, ODLOŽENI NA ODLAGALIŠČA, NA PREBIVALCA V KG V LETIH 2000 IN 20091 1 Za regijo Nord-Est v Romuniji se raven odlaganja na odlagališča nanaša na odpadke, zbrane v obdobju 2003–2009, raven ločenega zbiranja odpadkov pa na obdobje 2004–2009; za Andaluzijo se raven ločenega zbiranja odpadkov nanaša na obdobje 2002–2008; za regijo Sud-Vest pa se raven odlaganja zbranih odpadkov na odlagališča in raven ločenega zbiranja nanašata na obdobje 2006–2009.
Source: European Court of Auditors based on data available at Commission and Member State levels. FIGURE 5 WASTE LANDFILLED PER CAPITA (KG) IN 2000 AND 20091 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 ES-Catalonia IT-Sardinia IT-Puglia Year 2000 ES-Andalucía PT-Norte PT-LVT RO-Nord-Est Year 2009 RO-Sud-Vest 1 For the region RO-Nord-Est data refer to 2003 and 2009 and for RO-Sud-Vest to 2007 and 2009. 
600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Španija-Katalonija Italija-Sardinija Italija-Apulija leto 2000 Španija-Andaluzija Portugalska-Norte Portugalska-Romunija- LVT Nord-Est leto 2009 Romunija-Sud-Vest 1 Podatki za regijo Nord-Est v Romuniji se nanašajo na leto 2003 in leto 2009, za regijo Sud-Vest v Romuniji pa na leto 2007 in leto 2009. Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi podatkov, ki so na voljo na ravni Komisije in držav članic. Posebno poročilo št.
42. The same regions, Sardinia and Catalonia, are the only ones which contributed to achieving EU targets for specific types of municipal waste: (a) in terms of diversion of biodegradable waste from landfills, only Sardinia and Catalonia contributed to meeting the landfill directive targets. 
TABELA 2 (a) pri preusmerjanju biološko razgradljivih odpadkov z odlagališč sta samo Sardinija in Katalonija prispevali k doseganju ciljnih vrednosti iz direktive o odlagališčih.
Two other regions did not contribute to meeting the EU targets; and for four others the deadline to achieve the target was 2010. 
Dve drugi regiji nista prispevali k doseganju ciljnih vrednosti EU, za preostale štiri pa je bil rok za dosego ciljnih vrednosti leta 2010.