natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although overall the objectives of the calls are more specific than the ones in the work programme, they do not meet all SMART criteria. 
Čeprav so cilji razpisov na splošno določnejši od ciljev programa dela, ne ustrezajo vsem merilom SMART.
Beside objectives, each call also includes an expected impact section. However the expected impacts are rarely quantified and generally do not include indicators. 
Poleg ciljev vsak razpis vsebuje tudi oddelek s pričakovanimi učinki, ki pa so redko količinsko opredeljeni in običajno ne zajemajo kazalnikov.
It will thus be difficult for the Commission to measure the success of the calls in the absence of operational objectives and indicators with targets. 
Ker ni operativnih ciljev in kazalnikov s cilji, bo Komisija torej težko izmerila uspeh razpisov.
3.38. The sampled work programmes do not identify their long-term contribution to the strategic objectives even though this should be explained according to guidance on work programmes. 
3.38 V programih dela v vzorcu ni opredeljen njihov dolgoročni prispevek k strateškim ciljem, čeprav bi ga bilo treba v skladu s smernicami za programe dela pojasniti.
None of the examples we analysed explain how the work programme contributes towards the achievement of specific Europe 2020 objectives; in one case, the objective of the work programme links the actions supported to one of the flagship initiatives but does not specify exactly how. 
Noben od primerov, ki smo jih analizirali, ne pojasnjuje, kako program dela prispeva k doseganju posebnih ciljev Evrope 2020.
However, the primary focus of the work programme is to provide the information necessary for applicants to prepare high quality proposals. 
Vendar je glavni namen delovnih programov, da zagotovijo informacije, ki jih vlagatelji potrebujejo za pripravo kakovostnih predlogov.
Work programmes do not need to identify their contribution to Europe 2020 objectives. 
V delovnih programih opredelitev prispevka programa k ciljem Evrope 2020 ni potrebna.
They should rather be linked to the specific objectives of Horizon 2020, and these objectives have been formulated to comply with Europe 2020. 
Pravzaprav naj bi bili programi povezani s posebnimi cilji Obzorja 2020, ti cilji pa so bili oblikovani v skladu z Evropo 2020.
Performance will firstly be assessed through the indicators set out in the legislation. 
Smotrnost poslovanja se bo najprej ocenjevala s kazalniki, določenimi v zakonodaji.
This is made clear in Article 5 of the Horizon 2020 legislation. ‘The first set of relevant performance indicators for assessing progress against the general objective is set out in [the Annex to the Regulation]’. 
To je jasno navedeno v členu 5 zakonodaje za Obzorje 2020. „Prva skupina zadevnih kazalnikov uspešnosti za ocenjevanje napredka v okviru splošnega cilja je določena v [Prilogi k Uredbi]“.
This will be the primary information on which the assessment of performance will be established. 
To so osnovne informacije, na katerih bo temeljila ocena smotrnosti poslovanja.
EN C 375/98 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS There is a focus on performance in proposals, evaluations and grant agreements but there are weaknesses that can lead to problems when assessing performance 3.39. Under the calls, applicants submit proposals for funding. 
C 375/98 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA Predlogi, vrednotenja in sporazumi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev so osredotočeni na smotrnost poslovanja, vendar obstajajo slabosti, ki lahko pri ocenjevanju smotrnosti poslovanja privedejo do težav 3.39 V okviru razpisov vlagatelji predložijo predloge za financiranje.
The Commission evaluates the proposals and for those it chooses to fund the Commission signs grant agreements with beneficiaries. 
Komisija predloge ovrednoti in za tiste, ki se jih odloči financirati, podpiše sporazume o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev z upravičenci.
In this section we assess the focus on performance for these stages of the management process. Evaluation of proposals 3.40. 
V tem oddelku Sodišče ocenjuje osredotočenost na smotrnost poslovanja v teh fazah procesa upravljanja.
Proposals are normally evaluated by experts, on behalf of the Commission, based on their excellence, impact and the quality and efficiency of their implementation(33). 
Vrednotenje predlogov 3.40 Predloge za Komisijo običajno ovrednotijo strokovnjaki, in sicer na podlagi njihove odličnosti, učinka ter kakovosti in učinkovitosti njihovega izvajanja(33).
With the exception of the ERC, which uses only the excellence criterion, the beneficiaries’ proposals we examined all included sections structured around these three evaluation criteria, with the weighting for impact at least as high as the other two criteria. 
Razen Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta, ki uporablja le merilo odličnosti, so vsi predlogi upravičencev, ki jih je pregledalo Sodišče, zajemali oddelke, strukturirane glede na ta tri merila vrednotenja. Ponder za učinek je bil vsaj tako visok kot za drugi dve merili.
However, the quality of this evaluation depends on the quality of the expected impacts set out in the calls published by the Commission. 
Toda kakovost tega vrednotenja je odvisna od kakovosti opredelitve pričakovanih učinkov v razpisih, ki jih je objavila Komisija.
3.41. For the excellence criterion, templates included in proposals indicate how objectives should be defined. 
3.41 Za merilo odličnosti je v predlogah iz predlogov navedeno, kako je treba opredeliti cilje.
Three out of the five proposal templates sampled required applicants to define SMART objectives and explain how they relate to the topic of the relevant work programme. 
Tri od petih predlog iz predlogov v vzorcu so zahtevale, da vlagatelji opredelijo cilje SMART in pojasnijo, kako se nanašajo na temo ustreznega programa dela.
The objectives of these three proposals are generally SMART. 
Cilji teh treh predlogov so običajno SMART.
However, for the other two proposals, related to the ERC and Marie Curie, the sampled proposals did not include SMART objectives as there was no such requirement. 
Pri drugih dveh predlogih, ki sta povezana z Evropskim raziskovalnim svetom in Marie Curie, predlogi v vzorcu niso zajemali ciljev SMART, saj take zahteve ni bilo.
(33) Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013. 
(33) Člen 15 Uredbe (EU) št.
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal of the European Union C 375/99 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Grant agreements 3.42. Grant agreements are the main way in which Horizon 2020 funds are allocated to deliver the programme objectives. The sampled grant agreements used the same objectives as were in the proposals. 
SL Pri sporazumih v vzorcu so bili uporabljeni enaki cilji kot v predlogih. 10. 3.
3.43. Grant agreements include a section on ‘background and 3.43. results’. 
3.43 Sporazumi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev vsebujejo oddelek o ozadju in rezultatih.
These results mean ‘any tangible and intangible output Information on the indicators established in the legal base can and will of the action’ as defined in the rules of participation (34). 
Ti rezultati pomenijo „vse materialne in nematerialne rezultate dejavnosti“, kot so opredeljeni v pravilih za sodelovanje (34).
There is be collected to allow an assessment of performance. an important provision in the grant agreements which requires beneficiaries to report to the Commission information for the aggregation of the Horizon 2020 KPIs; this level is therefore an important source of all performance information for Horizon 2020. 
Sporazumi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev vključujejo pomembno določbo, ki zahteva, da upravičenci Komisiji sporočijo informacije o združitvi ključnih kazalnikov smotrnosti poslovanja Obzorja 2020. Zato je ta raven pomemben vir vseh informacij o smotrnosti poslovanja za Obzorje 2020.
We have pointed to problems assessing performance at the higher level (work programmes and calls) in the previous paragraphs. 
V prejšnjih odstavkih smo opozorili na težave pri ocenjevanju smotrnosti na višji ravni (programi dela in razpisi).
The design of the monitoring and reporting system of Horizon 2020 limits the Commission’s ability to properly monitor and report on performance 3.44. This section focuses on the monitoring and reporting system for Horizon 2020. 
Zasnova sistema spremljanja in poročanja za Obzorje 2020 omejuje zmožnost Komisije, da ustrezno spremlja smotrnost poslovanja in poroča o njej 3.44 Ta oddelek je osredotočen na sistem spremljanja in poročanja za Obzorje 2020.
We examined whether: (a) the current setup enables the Commission to monitor and report separately the spending on research and development as opposed to innovation; (b) the contribution of Horizon 2020 to Europe 2020 can be reported on; (c) the Commission will be in a position to evaluate the programme in the course of its life. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali: (a) sedanja ureditev Komisiji omogoča, da bi ločeno spremljala porabo za raziskave in razvoj ter za porabo za inovacije in ločeno poročala o njiju; (b) je mogoče poročati o prispevku Obzorja 2020 k Evropi 2020; (c) bo Komisija lahko vrednotila program med njegovim potekom.
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES See Commission’s replies to paragraphs 3.36 to 3.38. 
3.43 Glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke 3.36 do 3.38.
(34) Article 2(1)(19) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013. 
(34) Člen 2(1)(19) Uredbe (EU) št.
EN C 375/100 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Spending on research is not monitored separately from that on innovation 3.45. 
C 375/100 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Poraba za raziskave se ne spremlja ločeno od porabe za inovacije 3.45 Obzorje 2020 združuje prej ločene instrumente financiranja za raziskave in inovacije v skupen strateški okvir(35).
In line with this approach, the innovation-related parts of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (36) and the EIT were brought together under the umbrella of Horizon 2020. 
V skladu s tem pristopom so bili deli okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (36), ki so povezani z inovacijami, ter EIT združeni v okviru Obzorja 2020.
3.46. We pointed out in the past that the proposed legislation for Horizon 2020 did not provide a clear definition of innovation and that without some limits on the scope of fundable innovation activities there was a risk that a wide range of innovation projects would dilute funding (37). 
3.46 V preteklosti smo opozorili, da predlagana zakonodaja za Obzorje 2020 ne zagotavlja jasne opredelitve inovacij in da brez omejitve obsega inovacijskih dejavnosti, ki jih je mogoče financirati, obstaja tveganje, da bo široka paleta inovacijskih projektov razvodenila financiranje(37).
In our view this risk persists. 
Menimo, da je to tveganje še vedno prisotno.
The framework programme and the specific programme for Horizon 2020 do not provide clear criteria to distinguish between ‘research and development’ and ‘innova-tion’(38) or to monitor and report separately on the performance under these headings. 
Okvirni program in posebni program za Obzorje 2020 ne zagotavljata jasnih meril za razlikovanje med raziskavami in razvojem ter inovacijami (38), pa tudi ne za ločeno spremljanje smotrnosti poslovanja v okviru teh postavk in ločeno poročanje o njiju.
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES One of the major aims of Horizon 2020, set out from the beginning of discussions on the framework programme, was to narrow the divide between research and innovation. 
Eden od glavnih ciljev Obzorja 2020, ki je določen že od začetka razprav o okvirnem programu, je zmanjšanje vrzeli med raziskavami in inovacijami.
The legislation gives no separate definition of research and innovation instead stating that: ‘“Research and innovation activities” mean the whole spectrum of activities of research, technological development, demonstration and innovation, including the promotion of cooperation with third countries and international organisations, the dissemination and optimisation of results and the stimulation of high quality training and mobility of researchers in the Union’. The Commission considers that distinguishing between research and innovation activities is not required, has no clear added value, and risks to run counter to the efforts to narrow the gap between research and innovation in Europe. 3.46-3.47. 
V zakonodaji ni ločenih opredelitev raziskav in inovacij, temveč je navedeno: „‚[D]ejavnosti na področju raziskav in inovacij‘ pomeni celoten spekter dejavnosti na področju raziskav, tehnološkega razvoja, predstavitev in inovacij, vključno s spodbujanjem sodelovanja s tretjimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami, razširjanjem in optimizacijo rezultatov ter spodbujanjem visokokakovostnega usposabljanja in mobilnosti raziskovalcev v Uniji.“ Komisija meni, da razlikovanje med dejavnostmi raziskav in inovacij ni potrebno, da nima jasne dodane vrednosti in da obstaja tveganje, da bi bilo v nasprotju s prizadevanji za zmanjšanje vrzeli med raziskavami in inovacijami v Evropi.
(35) COM(2010) 700 final of 19 October 2010, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the National Parliaments, ‘The EU Budget Review’, p. 
3.46 in 3.47 (35) COM(2010) 700 final z dne 19. oktobra 2010, Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru, Odboru regij in nacionalnim parlamentom – Pregled proračuna EU, str.
8 and COM(2011) 500 final of 29 June 2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘A Budget for Europe 2020’, Part I, p. 
8, ter COM(2011) 500 final z dne 29. junija 2011, Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020, del I, str.
See also Recitals 4, 5, 7, 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013. 
Glej tudi uvodne izjave 4, 5, 7 in 10 Uredbe (EU) št.
(36) Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme, the Information Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme, and the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme. 
(36) Program za podjetništvo in inovativnost, podporni program za politiko informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij ter program „Inteligentna energija – Evropa“.
(37) Opinion No 6/2012 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules for the participation and dissemination in ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’, paragraphs 37 and 38 (http://eca.europa.eu). 
(37) Odstavka 37 in 38 Mnenja št. 6/2012 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravilih za sodelovanje v okvirnem programu za raziskave in inovacije Obzorje 2020 ter razširjanje njegovih rezultatov (2014–2020) (http://eca. europa.eu).
(38) The dividing line between research and innovation is not always obvious. 
(38) Razmejitev med raziskavami in inovacijami ni vedno očitna.
The Commission uses the ‘Frascati Manual 2015 — Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development’(http://www.oecd.org) and the ‘Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation data 2005’ (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org) to make the distinction. 
Za razlikovanje Komisija uporablja priročnik Frascati 2015 – Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development (smernice za zbiranje podatkov o raziskavah in eksperimentalnem razvoju ter poročanje o njih) (http://www.oecd.org) in priročnik iz Osla – Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation data 2005 (smernice za zbiranje in razlaganje podatkov o inovacijah 2005) (http://www. oecd-ilibrary.org).
EN 13.10.2016 Official Journal of the European Union C 375/101 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 3.47. The EU has adopted the 3 % headline target for the research and development intensity indicator. Not all of the innovation activity funded by Horizon 2020 falls within the definition of research and development for the purpose of this target(39). 
13.10.2016 Uradni list Evropske unije C 375/101 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA 3.47 EU je sprejela krovni cilj v zvezi s 3 % BDP za kazalnik intenzivnosti raziskav in razvoja. V opredelitev raziskav in razvoja, ki se uporablja za namene tega cilja (39), ne sodijo vse inovacijske dejavnosti, ki se financirajo iz Obzorja 2020.
As a matter of fact, there are activities within Horizon 2020 that aim specifically at fostering innovation (40) as opposed to research and development and, therefore, are not captured by the 3 % target. 
Dejansko v okviru Obzorja 2020 obstajajo dejavnosti, ki so posebej namenjene spodbujanju inovacij (40), ne pa raziskav in razvoja, zato niso zajete v cilj v zvezi s 3 % BDP.
The contribution of Horizon 2020 to Europe 2020 whilst established in the budget will not be reported on in meaningful way at least until 2018 3.48. The programme statements, used in the budgetary procedure to justify operational expenditure, provide information on the links between spending programmes and the Europe 2020 strategy by signalling the headline targets pursued and by estimating the financial contribution of programmes to the flagship initiatives. 
Prispevek Obzorja 2020 k Evropi 2020 je v proračunu sicer opredeljen, vendar o njem ne bo smiselnega poročanja vsaj do leta 2018 3.48 Izjave o programih, ki se v proračunskem postopku uporabljajo za utemeljitev operativnih odhodkov, zagotavljajo informacije o povezavah med programi porabe in strategijo Evropa 2020, tako da prikazujejo krovne cilje, ki si jih programi prizadevajo doseči, in ocenjujejo finančni prispevek programov k vodilnim pobudam.
Therefore, the financing of the Europe 2020 strategy from the EU budget is calculated based on the estimated financial contribution of spending programmes to the flagship initiatives in the programme statements. 
Zato se financiranje strategije Evropa 2020 iz proračuna EU izračuna na podlagi ocenjenega finančnega prispevka programov porabe k vodilnim pobudam v izjavah o programih.
(39) Research and experimental development (R&D) comprise creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge — including knowledge of humankind, culture and society-and to devise new applications of available knowledge. 
(39) Raziskave in eksperimentalni razvoj zajemajo ustvarjalno in sistematično delo, ki se opravlja za povečanje znanja, vključno z znanjem o človeku, kulturi in družbi, ter iskanje novih možnosti uporabe razpoložljivega znanja.
There are three types of R&D, basic research, applied research and experimental development. 
Obstajajo tri vrste raziskav in eksperimentalnega razvoja: temeljne raziskave, uporabne raziskave in eksperimentalni razvoj.
Experimental development is systematic work, drawing on knowledge gained from research and practical experience and producing additional knowledge, which is directed to producing new products or processes or to improving existing products or processes (Frascati Manual 2015, paragraphs 2.5, 2.24 and 2.32). 
Eksperimentalni razvoj pomeni sistematično delo, ki se opira na znanje, pridobljeno z raziskavami in praktičnimi izkušnjami, ter ustvarja novo znanje, usmerjeno v oblikovanje novih proizvodov ali procesov ali izboljševanje obstoječih proizvodov ali procesov (odstavki 2.5, 2.24 in 2.32 priročnika Frascati 2015).
(40) Examples of innovation funded by Horizon 2020 are the ‘market-uptake of innovations’ and ‘bringing discovery to market applications, leading to exploitation and commercialisation of ideas’ (Recital 12 and Annex I, Section 2.I of Decision 2013/743/ EU, respectively) as well as the commercial application of higher education, research and innovation activities supported by the EIT (Recital 8, Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology). 
(40) Primeri inovacij, financiranih iz Obzorja 2020, so tržno uveljavljanje inovacij, lajšanje prehoda od odkritja do tržne uporabe, kar omogoča izkoriščanje in komercializacijo idej (uvodna izjava 12 oziroma oddelek 2.I Priloge I Sklepa 2013/743/EU) ter komercialna uporabnost dejavnosti visokošolskega izobraževanja, raziskav in inovacij, ki jih podpira EIT (uvodna izjava 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 294/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2008 o ustanovitvi Evropskega inštituta za inovacije in tehnologijo).
EN C 375/102 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 3.49. In terms of the budgetary process, through the programme statements Horizon 2020 links over 90% of its 2015 budget to the different flagship initiatives. Almost half of this sum (4,3 billion out of 9,5 billion euro) was allocated to actions related to flagship initiative ‘Innovation Union’. 
C 375/102 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 3.49 Kar zadeva proračunski proces, Obzorje 2020 z izjavami o programih povezuje več kot 90 % svojega proračuna za leto 2015 z različnimi vodilnimi pobudami. Skoraj polovica te vsote (4,3 milijarde EUR od 9,5 milijarde EUR) je bila dodeljena ukrepom, ki so povezani z vodilno pobudo Unija inovacij.
3.50. While links between Horizon 2020 and Europe 2020 are established for the budgetary procedure, they are not reflected in the performance reporting on Horizon 2020. 
3.50 Čeprav so v okviru proračunskega postopka vzpostavljene povezave med Obzorjem 2020 in Evropo 2020, se te ne odražajo v poročanju o smotrnosti poslovanja za Obzorje 2020.
The Horizon 2020 legislation requires monitoring to include information on cross-cutting topics, one of which is the contribution to all relevant Europe 2020 flagship initiatives (41). 
Zakonodaja o Obzorju 2020 zahteva, da spremljanje zajema informacije o medsektorskih temah, ena od katerih je prispevek k vsem ustreznim vodilnim pobudam Evrope 2020 (41).
However, the Horizon 2020 annual monitoring report 2014 (published in April 2016) does not address the contribution of Horizon 2020 to the relevant flagship initiatives. 
Vendar pa letno poročilo o spremljanju Obzorja 2020 za leto 2014 (objavljeno aprila 2016) ne obravnava prispevka Obzorja 2020 k ustreznim vodilnim pobudam.
The links of Horizon 2020 and Europe 2020 will only be assessed in the interim evaluation report of Horizon 2020, expected in 2017. 
Povezave med Obzorjem 2020 in Evropo 2020 bodo ocenjene šele v poročilu o vmesnem vrednotenju Obzorja 2020, pričakovanem v letu 2017.
And none of the Commission’s evaluation reports required under Article 318 of the TFEU over the past years have reported on this contribution in a useful way. of the European Union THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 3.50. 
Nobeno od poročil Komisije o vrednotenju, ki jih zahteva člen 318 PDEU, v zadnjih letih ni na koristen način poročalo o tem prispevku.
The Commission considers that Article 31 of the Regulation establishing Horizon 2020, which establishes the scope of the annual monitoring report, does not require that it addresses the contribution of Horizon 2020 to the relevant flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 strategy. 
3.50 Komisija meni, da ji člen 31 uredbe o vzpostavitvi programa Obzorje 2020, ki določa obseg letnega poročila o spremljanju, ne nalaga, da obravnava prispevek Obzorja 2020 k ustreznim vodilnim pobudam strategije Evropa 2020.
The monitoring report is a report on the implementation of Horizon 2020 only. 
Poročilo o spremljanju je poročilo samo o izvajanju Obzorja 2020.
According to Article 32 of the Regulation establishing Horizon 2020, the contribution of Horizon 2020 to the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy will be taken into account in the interim evaluation of Horizon 2020. 
V skladu s členom 32 uredbe o vzpostavitvi programa Obzorje 2020 se bo prispevek Obzorja 2020 k ciljem strategije Evropa 2020 upošteval med vmesnim vrednotenjem Obzorja 2020.
The Commission’s evaluation reports under Article 318 of the TFEU can only report on the contribution of Horizon 2020 to Europe 2020 when this information is available after the interim evaluation. 
Komisija lahko v ocenjevalnih poročilih na podlagi člena 318 PDEU o prispevku Obzorja 2020 k Evropi 2020 poroča šele takrat, ko te informacije postanejo na voljo po vmesnem vrednotenju.