natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 1.41. The Commission notes that the overall share of financial corrections cited by the Court is roughly in line with the part of the budget in shared management and the fact that this area is responsible for a large part of the errors detected by the Court. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 1.41 Komisija ugotavlja, da skupni delež finančnih popravkov, ki ga navaja Sodišče, v grobem ustreza delu proračuna, ki se izvršuje z deljenim upravljanjem, in da je to področje odgovorno za velik del napak, ki jih je odkrilo Sodišče.
The Court’s emphasis on differences between recoveries and financial corrections is already reflected in some reports and will be taken into account in future annual activity reports. 
Pomen, ki ga Sodišče pripisuje razlikovanju med izterjavami in finančnimi popravki, je že upoštevan v nekaterih poročilih in bo upoštevan tudi v prihodnjih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih.
The EU annual accounts present in a fair way the amounts of financial corrections deriving from Commission’s supervisory role. 
Letni računovodski izkazi EU dajejo pošteno sliko zneskov finančnih popravkov, ki izhajajo iz nadzorne vloge Komisije.
Amounts presented as financial corrections indicate that the Commission has taken steps to protect the EU budget from unduly paid monies. 
Zneski, ki so prikazani kot finančni popravki, kažejo, da je Komisija ukrepala za zaščito proračuna EU pred neupravičeno izplačanimi denarnimi sredstvi.
Comments thereon aim at clarifying the procedure the Commission applies in doing this. 
Pripombe glede teh zneskov so namenjene pojas­ nitvi postopka, ki ga Komisija pri tem uporablja.
These monies will eventually be recovered from beneficiaries through recovery procedures initiated by Member States, as it is in their interest to recover funds where possible. 
Ta denarna sredstva bodo na koncu izterjana od upravičencev na podlagi postopkov izter­ jave, ki jih začnejo države članice, saj je v njihovem interesu, da izterjajo sredstva, kadar je to mogoče.
The Commission also refers to its replies to paragraphs 1.36 and 1.40. 
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoje odgovore na odstavka 1.36 in 1.40.
TheCommissionpresentsdataforthreemainstages in the process: — A correction is in progress when the recovery or financial correction is still in the process of being finalised (e.g. through legal or contradictory procedures at the Commission and/or the Member States). — A correction is confirmed/decided when the amount of the recovery or financial correction is established and finalised (e.g. through a Commission decision or an agreement with the Member State). — A correction is implemented when the recovery or financial correction is actually cashed (e.g. through the receipt of a repayment by the Commission or the deduction by the Member State from payment claims). 
Različne stopnje mehanizmov za popravke 1.42 Komisija predstavi podatke za tri glavne stopnje procesa: — Popravek se izvaja, ko se izterjava ali finančni popravek še dokončuje (npr. s pravnimi ali kontradiktornimi postopki v Komisiji in/ali državah članicah). — Popravek je potrjen/sprejet, ko je znesek izterjave ali fina­ nčnega popravka določen in dokončen (npr. s sklepom Komisije ali dogovorom z državo članico). — Popravek je izveden, ko je izterjava ali finančni popravek dejansko plačan (npr. ko Komisija prejme povračilo ali ko država članica odšteje zadevni znesek od zahtevkov za plačilo).
1.43. TheCommissionmakesclearthatthedatapresented concerning the different stages of the corrective mechanisms in the policy group Cohesion refer only to recoveries and financial corrections which it has imposed. 
1.43 Komisijajejasnonavedla,dasepredstavljenipodatki za različne stopnje mehanizmov za popravke v skupini politik kohezija nanašajo le na izterjave in finančne popravke, ki jih je naložila.
EN 30 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 1.44. In this respect, attention is drawn to the fact that for the policy group Cohesion only 20% of the amounts confirmed in 2009 (2 411 million euro) have been imple­ mented (476 million euro) in the same year. 
SL 30 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 1.44 Sodišče pri tem opozarja na dejstvo, da je bilo za skupino politik kohezija le 20 % popravkov, potrjenih leta 2009 (2 411 milijonov EUR), izvršenih (476 milijonov EUR) v istem letu.
Added to the amounts outstanding from previous years, a total amount of 2 332 million euro still remains to be implemented at year-end 2009. 
Če se prištejejo še neizvedeni popravki iz prejšnjih let, so popravki, ki jih je treba še izvesti, ob koncu leta 2009 znašali 2 332 milijonov EUR.
Unless further expenditure declarations are submitted by Member States in subsequent years, the remainder will be implemented only at the closure of the programmes (32). 
Če države članice v naslednjih letih ne predložijo nadaljnjih izjav o odhodkih, bodo preostali popravki izvedeni šele ob zaključku programov (32).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 1.44. The annual accounts give detailed information on the financial corrections confirmed, implemented and to be implemented and explain the reasons for which an important amount is still to be implemented. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 1.44 Letni računovodski izkazi dajejo podrobne informacije o potrjenih finančnih popravkih, ki so že bili ali še bodo izvedeni, in pojasnjujejo, zakaj pomemben znesek šele bo izveden.
As the Court rightly points it out, implementation of financial corrections, from the recent years, will mainly occur at the closure of the programme where the regulatory ceiling for interim payments has been reached. 
Kot je ustrezno poudarilo Sodišče, bo izvajanje finančnih popravkov za zadnjih nekaj let potekalo večinoma ob zaključku programa, ko bo dosežen predpisani prag za vmesna plačila.
Also, financial corrections confirmed during the life of the programmes may be implemented in subsequent payment claims. 
Poleg tega se lahko finančni popravki, ki so potrjeni v življenjskem ciklu programa, izvedejo v naslednjih zahtevkih za plačilo.
It is therefore difficult to make a direct link between amounts of financial corrections confirmed in a given year, and amounts implemented in the same year. 
Iz tega razloga je težko vzpostaviti neposredno povezavo med zneski finančnih popravkov, potrjenih v danem letu, in zneski izvedenih popravkov v tem istem letu.
As the ceiling for payments may have been reached for most programmes relating to the 2000-2006 period, it is inevitable that the deduction of the ineligible expenditure will be reflected only in the closure documents, which are due to be submitted by the Member State in 2010. 
Ker je bil prag za plačila za večino programov v zvezi z obdobjem 2000–2006 morda že dosežen, je neizogibno, da bo odbitek neupravičenih odhodkov zajet le v zaključni dokumentaciji, ki jo mora država članica predložiti leta 2010.
As soon as the Commission has evidence of the implementation of a correction by deduction of the ineligible expenditure from a closure payment request, it will report the financial correction as imple­ mented. 
Komisija bo sporočila finančni popravek kot izveden takoj, ko bo imela dokaz o izvedbi popravka z odbitkom neupravičenih odhodkov v zahtevku za plačilo ob zaključku programa.
Detailed information on the implementation of financial corrections is provided in note 6 to the consolidated accounts. 
Podrobne informacije o izvajanju finančnih popravkov so v pojasnilu 6 h konsolidiranim računovodskim izkazom.
Even though not all the individual financial corrections can be traced in the accounting system of the Commission, but only those with financial impact in terms of EU contribution, the financial corrections with evidence of implementation during 2010 will be reported as implemented in the accounts of the Commission for 2010. 
Čeprav v računovodskem sistemu Komisije ni mogoče slediti vsem posameznim finančnim popravkom, temveč le tistim, ki imajo finan­ čni učinek z vidika prispevka, bodo finančni popravki, za katere obstaja dokaz o izvedbi leta 2010, predstavljeni kot izvedeni v letnih računovodskih izkazih Komisije za leto 2010.
The figures vary significantly between programmes and Funds, due to the nature and / or volume of the concerned corrections. _____________ (32) In 2009, for most operational programmes of the 2000-2006 programming period, the 95 % ceiling for declaring expenditure before closure has already been reached. 
Zneski se precej razlikujejo med programi in skladi zaradi narave in/ ali obsega zadevnih popravkov. _____________ (32) Leta 2009 je bila zgornja meja 95 % odhodkov, ki jih je treba prijaviti pred zaključkom programa, za večino operativnih programov za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 že dosežena.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 31 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Lack of reliable information concerning the annual impact of corrective mechanisms 1.45. Inprinciple,ifreliableinformationisavailableabout the effect of corrective mechanisms in the past, it might be possible to estimate the likely effects of applying the same mechanisms in the future. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 31 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A Ni zanesljivih informacij o letnem učinku mehanizmov za popravke 1.45 Če so na voljo zanesljive informacije o učinku meha­ nizmov za popravke v preteklosti, naj bi bilo načeloma mogoče oceniti verjetne učinke uporabe istih mehanizmov v prihodnosti.
It has also sometimes been incorrectly suggested that recoveries and corrections can be compared with or even netted off against the Courts estimates of error. 1.46. 
Včasih se je napačno omenjala tudi možnost, da bi bilo mogoče izterjave in popravke primerjati z ocenami napak, ki jih pripravi Sodišče, ali jih celo izvesti na podlagi teh ocen.
However,reliableannualinformationabouttheeffects of corrective mechanisms is not available. 
1.46 Vendar zanesljive letne informacije o učinkih meha­ nizmov za izvajanje popravkov niso na voljo.
The notes to the financial statements do not systematically show how sums recovered are linked to specific years, and in some cases an accumulation or back-log of prior year corrections have been identified and recorded in the current financial year. 
V pojasnilih k računovodskim izkazom ni sistematično prikazano, kako so izterjani zneski povezani s posameznimi leti, v nekaterih primerih pa so nakopičeni ali zaostali popravki iz prejšnjih let navedeni in knjiženi v tekočem proračunskem letu.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 1.45. The Commission has observed that the Court's error rate (in particular for Cohesion) disclosed in its annual report has sometimes been translated into an absolute amount which has then been compared with the recoveries and corrections figures. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 1.45 Komisija opaža, da je stopnja napak, ki jo je Sodišče razkrilo v svojem letnem poročilu (zlasti za kohezijo), včasih preraču­ nana v absolutni znesek, ki se nato primerja z zneski izterjav in popravkov.
The Commission does not agree with this practice. 
Komisija se s tako prakso ne strinja.
The Commission has repeatedly confirmed that multiannual programmes are subject to multiannual control systems and that many errors detected by the Court in a given year would normally have been detected and corrected by Commission's systems in subsequent years. 
Komisija je večkrat potrdila, da se za večletne programe uporabljajo večletni kontrolni sistemi in da bi se veliko napak, ki jih v danem letu odkrije Sodišče, praviloma odkrilo in popravilo na podlagi sistemov Komisije v naslednjih letih.
This can be demonstrated by calculating residual error rates at the time of closure of a programme, which have been shown in the past to be lower than during the implementation period. 
To je mogoče pokazati z izračunom preostalih stopenj napak ob zaključku programa, za katere se je v preteklosti izkazalo, da so nižje kot med izvajanjem.
The Commission agrees that a comparison of the Court's DAS error rates, which relate to an annual examination of transactions, with its own calculated error is not straightforward. 1.46. 
Komisija se strinja, da primerjava stopenj napak, ki jih je Sodišče odkrilo v okviru DAS in so povezane z letno proučitvijo transakcij, z njenimi lastnimi izračunanimi stopnjami napak ni preprosta.
As mentioned by the Court itself in paragraph 1.44, most financial corrections in Cohesion accepted at this late stage of the programming period 2000-2006 will be implemented at the closure of the programme, and not in the year when they were made or when the financial correction was confirmed. 
1.46 Kakor Sodišče navaja v odstavku 1.44, bo večina finančnih popravkov na področju kohezije, ki so sprejeti v tej pozni fazi programskega obdobja 2000–2006, izvedenih ob zaključku programa in ne v letu, ko so bili izvedeni ali potrjeni.
This is the multiannual character of the corrective systems for shared management programmes. 
To gre pripisati večletni naravi sistemov izvajanja popravkov za programe v okviru deljenega upravljanja.
In addition flat-rate corrections may be imposed in situations where weaknesses of control systems at Member States' level are identified but were not corrected by the Member State itself, with no relation to specific irregular expenditure or specific year. 
Poleg tega se lahko, če so ugotovljene slabosti kontrolnih sistemov na ravni držav članic, vendar jih same države članice niso popravile, naložijo pavšalni popravki, ki niso povezani s posameznimi nepravil­ nimi odhodki ali posameznim letom.
It is therefore not possible to make a direct link between a financial correction and the year of the expenditure to which it relates. 
Zato ni mogoče vzpostaviti neposredne povezave med finančnim popravkom in letom odhodka, na katero se nanaša.
Structural Funds are implemented in a multi-annual framework. 
Strukturni skladi se izvajajo znotraj večletnega okvira.
If a financial correction has not been reported in year N it will be reported in year N+1, without this affecting the reliability of the procedure, whose main objective is to ensure that all irregular payments are corrected. 
Če finančni popravek ni bil sporočen v letu N, bo sporočen v letu N+1, ne da bi to vplivalo na zanesljivost postopka, katerega glavni cilj je zagotoviti, da se vsa nepravilna plačila popravijo.
This compensation between years within the programming period is necessary to give accurate, transparent and complete cumu­ lative information on financial corrections. 
Ta izravnava med posamez­ nimi leti programskega obdobja je potrebna za zagotovitev točnih, preglednih in celovitih kumulativnih informacij o finančnih popravkih.
Nonetheless, the notes to financial statements present information on financial corrections confirmed and implemented in a specific year, as well as cumulative information. 
Ne glede na to pa pojasnila k računovodskim izkazom predstavljajo informacije o finančnih popravkih, ki so bili potrjeni in izvedeni v posameznem letu, in tudi kumulativne informacije.
In contrast, in agriculture (EAGF and EAFRD), financial corrections are linked to expenditure of a specific financial year and this link is disclosed in each conformity decision adopted by the Commission. 
V nasprotju s tem so finančni popravki na področju kmetijstva (EKJS in EKSRP) povezani z odhodki posameznega proračunskega leta in ta povezava se razkrije v vsakem sklepu o skladnosti, ki ga sprejme Komisija.
EN 32 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 1.47. Moreoverthecyclesofmanycorrectionmechanisms may last for many years and variations in elements influencing the corrective capacity of many supervisory and control systems (legal and organisational framework; modalities of recovery procedures; type, size and duration of projects, etc.) may affect the capacity to estimate the likely impact in the future. 
SL 32 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 1.47 Poleg tega lahko cikli številnih mehanizmov za popravke trajajo več let in spremembe v elementih, ki vplivajo na zmogljivost za izvajanje popravkov v več nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemih (pravni in organizacijski okvir, načini izva­ janja postopkov izterjave, vrsta, velikost in trajanje projektov itn.), lahko vplivajo na zmogljivost za ocenjevanje verjetnega učinka v prihodnosti.
1.48. Finally,itshouldberecalledthattheCommission’s corrective mechanisms mainly involve financial corrections other than recoveries (see paragraphs 1.39 and 1.40). 
1.48 Nazadnjejetrebaopomniti,damehanizmiKomisijeza popravke zajemajo predvsem finančne popravke, ki niso izter­ jave (glej odstavka 1.39 in 1.40).
This is a positive devel­ opment. However, the information it provides is not yet completely reliable because the Commission does not always receive reliable information from Member States. 
To predsta­ vlja pozitiven razvoj, vendar informacije, ki jih zagotavlja, še niso povsem zanesljive, ker Komisija ne prejme vedno zane­ sljivih informacij od držav članic.
Furthermore, the need to refine the financial reporting guidelines pertaining to what information is to be included and how it should be treated should be examined. 
Poleg tega bi bilo treba preučiti potrebo po izpopolnitvi smernic za finančno poročanje v zvezi z informacijami, ki jih je treba zagotoviti, in načinom njihove obravnave.
For some areas of expenditure, the Commission does not provide information reconciling the following: the year in which the payment concerned is made, the year in which the related error is detected and the year in which the resulting financial correction is disclosed in the notes to the accounts. 
Komisija za nekatera področja odhodkov ne zagotavlja informacij, s katerimi bi bilo mogoče uskladiti: leto, v katerem se izvrši zadevno plačilo, leto, v katerem se odkrije z njim povezana napaka, in leto, v katerem se v pojasnilih k računovodskim izkazom razkrije posledični finančni popravek.
1.50. Thevastmajorityofthecorrectionsbyvalueinvolve financial corrections on Member States or third countries, rather than recoveries from individual beneficiaries who received EU funds incorrectly. 
1.50 Velika večina popravkov po vrednosti zajema finančne popravke, naložene državam članicam ali tretjim državam, ne pa izterjav od posameznih upravičencev, ki so nepravilno prejeli sredstva EU.
Taking this into consideration the Court concludes that it is not possible to make a meaningful comparison between its own estimate of error rates and the data for financial corrections and recoveries supplied by the Commission. 
Sodišče je ob upoštevanju tega prišlo do zaključka, da ni mogoče opraviti smiselne primerjave med svojimi ocenami stopenj napake in podatki o finančnih popravkih in izterjavah, ki jih sporoči Komisija.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 1.48. 1.49. See reply to paragraph 1.39. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 1.48 1.49 Glej odgovor na odstavek 1.39.
See replies to paragraphs 1.19, 1.40 and 1.46. 
Glej odgovore na odstavke 1.19, 1.40 in 1.46.
A reconciliation of payments, errors and financial corrections made as suggested by the Court is not possible where the expenditure declaration system is cumulative over a multi-annual period or in some cases where they are systems corrections (see also reply to paragraph 1.50). 1.50. 
Uskladitev plačil, napak in izvedenih finančnih popravkov, kakor jo predlaga Sodišče, ni mogoča, kadar je sistem za prijavo odhodkov kumulativen in zajema večletno obdobje ali, v nekaterih primerih, kadar obstajajo popravki na ravni sistemov (glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 1.50).
In direct management, the Commission corrects errors either by proceeding to a recovery (recovery order or compensation from a subsequent payment) or requests a corrected cost statement. 
1.50 Pri neposrednem upravljanju Komisija popravi napake tako, da začne postopek izterjave (nalog za izterjavo ali odbitek od nasled­ njega plačila) ali pa zahteva popravljeno izjavo o stroških.
The vast majority of the EU budget, some 80 %, is implemented in shared management where Member States are primarily responsible for ensuring the regularity of expenditure declared to the Commission and hence for detecting and correcting irregularities. 
Velika večina proračuna EU (okoli 80 %) se izvršuje v okviru delje­ nega upravljanja, pri katerem so za zagotavljanje pravilnosti odhodkov, prijavljenih Komisiji, in torej za odkrivanje in popravljanje nepravilnosti v prvi vrsti odgovorne države članice.
In this management mode the Commission is also responsible for ensuring that the systems put in place by the national authorities are effective and, if not, the Commission may impose financial corrections. 
Pri tej vrsti upra­ vljanja je Komisija odgovorna za zagotavljanje, da so sistemi, ki so jih vzpostavili nacionalni organi, uspešni, in lahko v nasprotnem primeru naloži finančne popravke.
The system of financial corrections foreseen by the applicable legislation is therefore such that the Commission recovers/corrects from the Member States, which in turn have to recover the irregular payment from the beneficiary. 
Sistem finančnih popravkov, ki je predviden v zadevni zakonodaji, je zato tak, da Komisija izvede izterjavo/popravek pri državah članicah, ki morajo nato izterjati nepravilno plačilo od upravičenca.
However, where financial corrections are linked to systemic weaknesses they are usually based on flat or extrapolated rates, and not to errors identified at the level of beneficiaries. 
Vendar pa tisti finančni popravki, ki so povezani s sistemskimi slabostmi, navadno temeljijo na pavšalnih ali ekstrapoliranih stopnjah in ne na napakah, ugotovljenih na ravni upravičencev.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 33 T H E C O M M IS S IO N ’ S R E P L IE S As a consequence, a distinction must be made regarding: — the information related to financial corrections following EU controls and audits, which is complete and reliable, but in case of systemic weaknesses cannot be directly linked to errors in payments to a beneficiary nor necessarily to a particular year; — the information transmitted to the Commission on withdrawals and recoveries of irregular expenditure by the Member States: while for Agriculture the information available is adequate (see reply to paragraph 1.17), for Cohesion the 2008 action plan for structural actions specifically addressed the quality and completeness of this data. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 33 O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Zato je treba razlikovati med: — informacijami v zvezi s finančnimi popravki na podlagi kontrol in revizij EU, ki so celovite in zanesljive, vendar pa jih v primeru sistemskih slabosti ni mogoče neposredno povezati z napakami v plačilih upravičencu niti ne nujno s posameznim proračunskim letom, — informacijami, ki jih države članice posredujejo Komisiji glede izvedenih umikov in izterjav nepravilnih odhodkov: medtem ko so razpoložljive informacije za področje kmetijstva ustrezne (glej odgovor na odstavek 1.17), je bila kakovost in celovitost teh podatkov za področje kohezije posebej obravnavana v akcijskem načrtu za strukturne ukrepe iz leta 2008.
As a consequence, data for 2009 submitted by the Member States to the Commission in the 1st half of 2010 are of better quality and more complete. 
Zato so bili podatki za leto 2009, ki so jih države članice posredovale Komisiji v prvi polovici leta 2010, boljše kakovosti in celovitejši.
The Commission agrees that a comparison of the Court's DAS error rates, which by virtue of the Treaty relate to an annual examination of a sample of transactions, with figures on financial corrections is not relevant. 
Komisija se strinja, da primerjava stopenj napak, ki jih je Sodišče odkrilo v okviru DAS in so v skladu s Pogodbo povezane z letno proučitvijo vzorca transakcij, z izračunanimi zneski finančnih popravkov ni smiselna.
Due to the different types of financial corrections as indicated above, it is not possible, in the field of Cohesion, to make a direct link between a financial correction and the year of the expen­ diture to which it relates. 
Zaradi različnih vrst finančnih popravkov, kakor so navedeni zgoraj, na področju kohezije ni mogoče vzpostaviti neposredne povezave med finančnim popravkom in letom odhodka, na katero se nanaša.