natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In respect of allocated expenditure whose general principles do not change (as compared to the 2000 Own Resources Decision), two details should be noted in particular in the context of the criticisms made in paragraphs 2.31 to 2.33: (a) The Commission’s working document provides that in those cases where the Commission is aware of expenditure that the recipient in question acts as an intermediary, the payments must be allocated whenever possible to the Member State(s) in which the final beneficiary(ies) is(are) resident, in accordance with their shares in these payments. (b) The concept of expenditure used by the Commission for the calculation of the UK correction corresponds to ‘actual payments’ relating to the year in question pursuant either to the annual budget or to carry-overs of non-executed appropriations to the following year. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 69 10. Glede razporejenih izdatkov, pri katerih se glavna načela niso spremenila (v primerjavi s Sklepom o lastnih sredstvih iz leta 2000), je treba omeniti dve podrobnosti, zlasti v kontekstu kritik iz odstavkov 2.31 do 2.33: (a) Delovni dokument Komisije določa, da je treba plačila v primerih, ko Komisija ve za odhodke, pri katerih ima prejemnik vlogo posrednika, kadar je mogoče dodeliti državi članici (državam članicam), v kateri (katerih) imajo upravičenec ali upravičenci svoj sedež, in sicer v skladu z njihovim deležem v teh plačilih. (b) Pojem odhodkov, ki ga Komisija uporablja za izračun popravka za Združeno kraljestvo, ustreza „dejanskim plačilom“ za zadevno leto v skladu bodisi z letnim proračunom bodisi s prenosom neporabljenih sredstev v naslednje leto.
Paragraphs 2.31 to 2.33 indicate that the Commission did not take appropriate steps to include in the calculation total allocated expenditure or to allocate payments whenever possible. 
Odstavki 2.31 do 2.33 kažejo, da Komisija ni ustrezno ukrepala, da bi v izračun zajela skupne razporejene izdatke ali razporedila plačila, kadar je bilo to mogoče.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 71 CHAPTER 3 Agriculture and Natural Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3.1-3.16 Specific characteristics of the policy group Audit scope and approach Regularity of transactions Effectiveness of systems Policy area Agriculture and rural development Systems related to regularity of transactions Systems related to recoveries and financial corrections Policy areas Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Health and Consumer Protection Reliability of Commission management representations Conclusions and recommendations Conclusions Recommendations Paragraph 3.2-3.15 3.16 3.17-3.22 3.23-3.51 3.23-3.48 3.23-3.41 3.42-3.48 3.49-3.51 3.52-3.54 3.55-3.60 3.55-3.56 3.57-3.60 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 71 Uvod Posebne značilnosti te skupine politik Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Pravilnost transakcij Uspešnost sistemov Odstavek 3.1–3.16 3.2–3.15 3.16 3.17–3.22 3.23–3.51 3.23–3.48 3.23–3.41 3.42–3.48 3.49–3.51 3.52–3.54 3.55–3.60 3.55–3.56 3.57–3.60 POGLAVJE 3 Kmetijstvo in naravni viri KAZALO Področje politik kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja Sistemi, povezani s pravilnostjo transakcij Sistemi v zvezi z izterjavami in finančnimi popravki Področja politik okolje, pomorske zadeve in ribištvo, zdravje in varstvo potroš­ nikov Zanesljivost poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije Zaključki in priporočila Zaključki Priporočila
EN 72 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S INTRODUCTION 3.1. This chapter presents the Court’s specific assessment of Agriculture and Natural Resources, which comprises policy areas 05 — Agriculture and rural development, 07 — Environment, 11 — Maritime Affairs and Fisheries and 17 — Health and Consumer Protection. 
72 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A UVOD 3.1 Topoglavjepredstavljaposebnoocenokmetijstvain naravnih virov, ki jo je pripravilo Sodišče in ki obsega področja politik 05 – kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, 07 – okolje, 11 – pomorske zadeve in ribištvo ter 17 – zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov.
Key information on the activities covered and the spending in 2010 is provided in Table 3.1. 
Ključne informacije o zajetih dejavnostih in porabi v letu 2010 so navedene v tabeli 3.1.
Table 3.1 — Agriculture and Natural Resources — key information 2010 Budget (million euro) Policy area Description Payments Agriculture and rural development Administrative expenditure Interventions in agricultural markets Direct aids Rural development Pre-accession measures Other 131 4 314 39 676 11 483 14 (7) 55 611 Environment Administrative expenditure Operational expenditure 91 267 358 Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Administrative expenditure Operational expenditure 40 616 656 Health and Consumer Protection Administrative expenditure Operational expenditure 112 478 590 title Management mode Centralised direct Shared Shared Shared Decentralised Shared 5 7 11 17 Centralised direct Centralised direct/Centralised indirect Centralised direct Centralised/Shared Centralised direct Centralised direct/Centralised indirect Total administrative expenditure (1) Total operational expenditure Of which: — advances — interim/final payments Total payments for the year Total commitments for the year 374 56 841 851 55 990 57 215 60 992 (1) The audit of administrative expenditure is reported in Chapter 7. Source: 2010 Annual Accounts of the European Union. 
Tabela 3.1 – Kmetijstvo in naravni viri – ključne informacije o letu 2010 Področje politik Opis Plačila Kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja upravni odhodki intervencije na kmetijskih trgih neposredne pomoči razvoj podeželja predpristopni ukrepi drugo 131 4 314 39 676 11 483 14 (7) 55 611 Okolje upravni odhodki operativni odhodki 91 267 358 Pomorske zadeve in ribištvo upravni odhodki operativni odhodki 40 616 656 Zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov upravni odhodki operativni odhodki 112 478 590 Prora­ čunski naslov (v milijonih EUR) Način upravljanja neposredno centralizirano deljeno deljeno deljeno decentralizirano deljeno neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano/posredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano centralizirano/deljeno neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano/posredno centralizirano 5 7 11 17 SL Upravni odhodki skupaj (1) Operativni odhodki skupaj Od tega: — predplačila — vmesna/končna plačila Plačila za leto skupaj Obveznosti za leto skupaj 374 56 841 851 55 990 57 215 60 992 (1) Revizija upravnih odhodkov je prikazana v poglavju 7. Vir: letni računovodski izkazi Evropske unije za leto 2010.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 73 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S Specific characteristics of the policy group Policy area agriculture and rural development 3.2. The objectives (1) of the common agricultural policy as set out in the Treaty are to increase agricultural productivity, thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, to stabilise markets, to assure the availability of supplies and to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 73 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A Posebne značilnosti te skupine politik Področje politik kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja 3.2 Cilji (1) skupne kmetijske politike, določeni v Pogodbi, so povečanje kmetijske produktivnosti za zagotavljanje primerne življenjske ravni kmetijske skupnosti, stabilizacija trgov in zagotavljanje redne preskrbe, ki je potrošnikom dostopna po primernih cenah.
3.3. The EU budget finances the common agricultural policy expenditure mainly through two Funds(2): the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (‘EAGF’), which fully finances EU direct aid and market measures(3), and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (‘EAFRD’), which co-finances at varying rates rural development programmes. 
3.3 Odhodki skupne kmetijske politike iz proračuna EU se financirajo predvsem iz dveh skladov (2): Evropskega kmetij­ skega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS), ki financira celotno nepo­ sredno pomoč EU in tržne ukrepe (3), ter Evropskega kmetij­ skega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), ki po različnih stop­ njah sofinancira programe za razvoj podeželja.
3.4. ThemainmeasuresfinancedbyEAGF(43990million euro) are: — the direct aid ‘Single Payment Scheme’ (SPS). 
3.4 Glavniukrepi,kisefinancirajoizEKJS(43990mili­ jonov EUR), so: — Shema neposredne pomoči, ki se imenuje „shema enotnega plačila“ (SEP).
SPS payments are based on ‘entitlements’ (4) each of which is activated with one hectare of eligible land declared by the farmer. 
Plačila v okviru SEP temeljijo na „pravicah“ (4). Vsaka pravica se aktivira z enim hektarom upravičenega zemljišča, ki ga je kmet prijavil.
SPS represented in 2010 29 070 million euro of expen­ diture (73 % of direct aids), — the direct aid ‘Single Area Payment Scheme’ (SAPS) which provides for the payment of uniform amounts per eligible hectare of agricultural land and is currently applied in ten of the new Member States (5) and in 2010 accounted for 4 460 million euro of expenditure (11 % of direct aids), — other direct aid schemes ‘coupled payments’ linked to specific types of agricultural production. 
Leta 2010 je SEP dosegala 29070 milijonov EUR odhodkov (73% neposrednih pomoči). — Pri shemi neposredne pomoči, ki se imenuje „shema enotnega plačila na površino“ (SEPP), je predvideno plačilo enotnih zneskov na hektar upravičenih kmetijskih zemljišč. SEPP se trenutno uporablja v desetih novih državah članicah (5), njeni odhodki pa so v letu 2010 znašali 4 460 milijonov EUR (11 % neposrednih pomoči). — Druge sheme neposrednih pomoči („vezana plačila“) so pove­ zane s posameznimi vrstami kmetijske proizvodnje.
In 2010 those schemes accounted for 6 146 million euro of expenditure (16 % of direct aids), _____________ (1) Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 
Te sheme so leta 2010 pomenile odhodke v višini 6 146 milijonov EUR (16 % neposrednih pomoči). _____________ (1) Člen 39 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
(4) The number and value of each farmer’s entitlement was calculated by the national authorities according to one of the models provided for under EU legislation. 
(4) Število in vrednost pravic za vsakega kmeta so izračunali nacionalni organi v skladu z enim od modelov, ki jih določa zakonodaja EU.
Under the historical model each farmer is granted entitlements based on the average amount of aid received and area farmed during the reference period 2000 to 2002. 
V okviru zgodovinskega modela se posameznemu kmetu odobrijo pravice na osnovi povprečnega zneska prejete pomoči in obdelo­ vane površine v referenčnem obdobju med letoma 2000 in 2002.
Under the regional model all entitlements of a region have the same flat-rate value and the farmer is allocated an entitlement for every eligible hectare declared in the first year of application. 
V okviru regionalnega modela imajo vse pravice v regiji enako pavšalno vrednost, posameznemu kmetu pa se dodeli pravica za vsak upra­ vičen prijavljen hektar v prvem letu zahtevka.
The hybrid model combines the historical element with a flat rate amount and, if it is dynamic, the historical component decreases each year until it becomes a predominantly flat rate-system. 
Hibridni model zdru­ žuje zgodovinski element in pavšalne zneske. Če je model dina­ mičen, se zgodovinska komponenta vsako leto zmanjša, dokler sistem ne preide v pretežno pavšalni sistem.
(5) Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. 
(5) Bolgarija, Češka, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Madžarska, Poljska, Romunija in Slovaška.
EN 74 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S — interventions in agricultural markets: the principal measures are intervention storage and export refunds, both of which have been declining in importance in recent years, and other measures such as specific support for the wine, fruit and vegetable and food programmes (in total amounting to 4 314 million euro in 2010). 
SL 74 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A — Intervencije na kmetijskih trgih: glavni ukrepi so intervencijsko skladiščenje in izvozna nadomestila, ki v zadnjih letih postajajo vse manj pomembni, ter drugi ukrepi, kot so posebna podpora za programe za vino, sadje in zelenjavo ter hrano (ki so leta 2010 znašali skupno 4 314 milijonov EUR).
3.5. The EAFRD co-finances Rural Development expenditure which covers a large number of measures such as agri-envi­ ronmental schemes, compensatory amounts for farming in less-favoured areas, investments in farms and infrastructure in rural areas (11 497 million euro) (6). 
3.5 EKSRP sofinancira odhodke za razvoj podeželja, ki zaje­ majo številne ukrepe, kot so kmetijsko-okoljski programi, kompenzacijski zneski za kmetovanje na območjih z omeje­ nimi možnostmi, naložbe v kmetije in infrastruktura na pode­ želju (11 497 milijonov EUR) (6).
Under all EAGF direct aid schemes(7) and certain EAFRD aid schemes, beneficiaries of EU aid have a legal obli­ gation to fulfil ‘cross compliance’ requirements relating to the protection of the environment, public health, animal and plant health, animal welfare (Statutory Management Requirements) and to the maintenance of agricultural land in good agri­ cultural and environmental condition (GAEC) (8). 
3.6 V okviru vseh shem neposrednih pomoči EKJS (7) in nekaterih shem pomoči EKSRP imajo upravičenci do pomoči EU zakonsko obveznost za izpolnjevanje zahtev v zvezi z „navzkrižno skladnostjo“, ki se nanašajo na varovanje okolja, javno zdravje, zdravje živali in rastlin, dobro počutje živali (predpisane zahteve ravnanja) ter na ohranjanje zemljišč v stanju, ki je v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji (8).
EU legislation provides that when non-compliance with those requirements is noted, a reduction or exclusion (9) shall be applied on the overall amount of direct payments made in respect of the applications submitted in the course of the calendar year of the finding. 
Zakonodaja EU določa, da se ob ugotovitvi nesklad­ nosti s temi zahtevami celoten znesek izvršenih neposrednih plačil za zahtevke, ki so bili predloženi v koledarskem letu ugotovitve, zniža ali izključi iz pomoči (9).
3.7. OnlyfarmersareeligibleforEUareaaid.Afarmeris defined as a natural or legal person who carries out an agri­ cultural activity which is defined as the production, rearing or growing of agricultural products including harvesting, milking, breeding animals and keeping animals for farming purposes, or maintaining the land in GAEC (10). 
Kmet je opredeljen kot fizična ali pravna oseba, ki izvaja kmetijsko dejavnost, ta pa je opredeljena kot proizvodnja, vzreja ali pridelovanje kmetijskih proizvodov, kar zajema žetev, molžo, rejo živali in rejo živali za kmetijske namene ali ohra­ njanje zemljišč v stanju, ki je v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji (10).
The maintenance of land in GAEC constitutes the minimum agricultural activity required of the applicant to be eligible for aid. _____________ (6) This amount entails expenditure in respect of previous programming period as well as pre-accession instruments. 
Ohranjanje zemljišča v dobrih kmetij­ skih in okoljskih pogojih je minimalna kmetijska dejavnost, ki jo mora vlagatelj zahtevka izvajati, da je upravičen do pomoči. _____________ (6) Ta znesek vključuje odhodke za prejšnje programsko obdobje in predpristopne instrumente.
(7) Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 
(7) Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 (UL L 30, 31.1.2009, str.
(8) Whilst GAEC standards, as referred to in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No73/2009, apply in all Member States, Statutory Management Requirements (SMRs) as referred to in Annex II to that Regulation are mandatory only in EU-15. 
(8) Standardi za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje, ki so navedeni v Prilogi III k Uredbi (ES) št. 73/2009, se uporabljajo v vseh državah članicah, predpisane zahteve ravnanja, ki so navedene v Prilogi II k isti uredbi, pa so zavezujoče le v EU-15.
(9) According to Articles 66 and 67 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 (OJ L 141, 30.4.2004, p. 
(9) V skladu s členoma 66 in 67 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 796/2004 (UL L 141, 30.4.2004, str.
18), the level of the reduction per SMR or GAEC not complied with can vary between 1 % and 5 % in case of negligence and can lead to full rejection of the aid in case of intentional non-compliance. 
18) lahko raven znižanj pri nesklad­ nosti s posamezno predpisano zahtevo ravnanja ali dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji v primeru malomarnosti znaša med 1 % in 5 %, v primeru namerne neskladnosti pa lahko pride do popolne izključitve iz pomoči.
(10) See Article 1 and Article 2(a) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E (10) Glej člen 1 ter člen 2(a) in (c) Uredbe (ES) št.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S Reductions and exclusions apply only if the non-compliance is due to an act or omission directly attributable to farmers and if it is not of a minor nature. 
73/2009. 3.6 Znižanja in izključitve se uporabljajo le, če je vzrok za neskladnost dejanje ali opustitev dejanja, ki ga je mogoče pripisati neposredno kmetom, in če neskladnost ni neznatna.
These paying agencies are responsible for making payments to the beneficiaries and prior to doing so, they must, either directly or through delegated bodies, satisfy themselves of the eligibility of the aid applications. 
Te plačilne agencije so odgovorne za izvrševanje plačil upravi­ čencem, pred izplačilom pa se morajo neposredno ali s pomočjo pooblaščenih organov prepričati o upravičenosti zahtevkov za pomoč.
The accounts and payment records of the paying agencies are examined by independent audit bodies (certification bodies) which report to the Commission in February of the following year. 
Računovodske izkaze in evidence plačil plačilnih agencij pregledajo neodvisni revizijski organi (certifi­ kacijski organi), ki o tem poročajo Komisiji februarja nasled­ njega leta.
Policy areas Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Health and Consumer Protection 3.9. The Union’s policy on the Environment is designed to contribute to protecting and improving the quality of the environment, human health, and rational utilisation of natural resources, including at international level. 
Področja politik okolje, pomorske zadeve in ribištvo, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov 3.9 PolitikaUnijenapodročjuokoljanajbiprispevalak varovanju in izboljševanju kakovosti okolja, zdravja ljudi in racionalni porabi naravnih virov, tudi na mednarodni ravni.
The Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE)(12) is the most important instrument in terms of funding (205 million euro expenditure in 2010) covering the EU contribution for projects in the Member States in favour of nature and biodi­ versity, as well as environment policy, governance, information and communication. 
Najpomembnejši instrument financiranja je finančni instru­ ment za okolje (LIFE) (12) (205 milijonov EUR odhodkov v letu 2010), ki zajema prispevke EU za projekte v državah članicah na področju narave in biotske raznovrstnosti ter okoljske politike, upravljanja, informiranja in komuniciranja.
The European Fisheries Fund (13) (EFF) is the main instrument (395million euro expenditure(14) in 2010) for the policy area Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. 
3.10 Evropski sklad za ribištvo (13) (ESR) je glavni instru­ ment (395 milijonov EUR odhodkov(14) v letu 2010) za področje politik pomorske zadeve in ribištvo.
In its designated domain the common fisheries policy pursues the same objectives as the common agricultural policy (see paragraph 3.2). 3.11. 
Skupna ribiška poli­ tika ima na svojem področju enake cilje kot skupna kmetijska politika na svojem (glej odstavek 3.2).
Concerning Health and Consumer Protection, the EU contributes, on the one hand, to human, animal and plant health protection and, on the other hand, to consumer welfare (478 million euro expenditure in 2010). 
3.11 VzvezizzdravjeminvarstvompotrošnikovEUprispevak varovanju zdravja ljudi, živali in rastlin ter hkrati k blaginji potrošnikov (478 milijonov EUR odhodkov v letu 2010).
Advances and interim/final payments 3.12. ForEAGFtheexpendituremainlyconsistsofreim­ bursements (interim/final payments) by the EU of subsidies paid to farmers and other beneficiaries by the Member States. 
Predplačila in vmesna/končna plačila 3.12 Pri EKJS so odhodki večinoma povračila (vmesna/ končna plačila) EU za subvencije, ki jih države članice plačajo kmetom in drugim upravičencem.
For the EFF, only interim payments were made. _____________ (11) Number of Paying Agencies: 82 at the beginning of financial year 2010, 81 at the end of financial year 2010 (source: AAR DG AGRI, p. 
Za ESR so bila izvršena samo vmesna plačila. _____________ (11) Število plačilnih agencij: 82 na začetku proračunskega leta 2010, 81 na koncu proračunskega leta 2010 (vir: Letno poročilo o dejav­ nostih GD AGRI, str.
(12) Regulation (EC) No 614/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 149, 9.6.2007, p. 1). 
614/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 149, 9.6.2007, str. 1).
(13) The Financial Instrument for the Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) has been replaced by the EFF for the current programming period (2007-2013) — Council Regulation (EC) No1198/2006 (OJ L 223, 15.8.2006, p. 1). (14) This amount includes expenditure in respect of previous programming periods, in particular for the FIFG. 
(13) Z ESR je bil v sedanjem programskem obdobju (2007–2013) nadomeščen Finančni instrument za usmerjanje ribištva (FIUR) – Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 (UL L 223, 15.8.2006, str. 1).
According to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006, the certification bodies examine, on an annual basis, the internal control procedures of the paying agencies, in addition to their annual accounts. 
885/2006 certifikacijski organi vsako leto poleg letnih računovodskih izkazov plačilnih agencij proučijo tudi njihove postopke notranjih kontrol. za FIUR.
EN 76 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.14. There are no advance payments for Health and Consumer Protection, Member States are reimbursed on the basis of their declared expenses. 
76 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A 3.14 Za področje zdravja in varstva potrošnikov ni pred­ plačil, povračilo državam članicam se izvrši na podlagi njihovih prijavljenih odhodkov.
For Environment, pre-financing of up to 40 % of the EU contribution for a LIFE project, as established in the grant agreement, is foreseen. 
Za področje okolja je pred­ videno predfinanciranje v višini do 40 % prispevka EU za posamezen projekt LIFE, kot je določeno v sporazumu o dona­ ciji.
Significant reduction in payment appropriations — EAFRD 3.15. IntheareaofEAFRD,paymentappropriationswere decreased by 1160million euro (around 9% of inititial payment appropriations) at the end of 2010 (15) primarily as a consequence of a slowdown in Member States’ expenditure due to difficulties in providing national co-financing in the current economic situation. 
Veliko zmanjšanje odobritev plačil – EKSRP 3.15 Na področju EKSRP so se odobritve plačil na koncu leta 2010 zmanjšale za 1 160 milijonov EUR (približno 9 % prvotnih odobritev plačil) (15), predvsem kot posledica počas­ nejše porabe v državah članicah zaradi težav pri zagotavljanju nacionalnega sofinanciranja v sedanjih gospodarskih razmerah.