natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Box 4 — Examples of low sanctions for non-compliance with key requirements The scale of calculation of reductions is systematically part of the scope of Commission audits, and is followed up by the clearance of accounts procedure. 
Okvir 4 – Primeri nizkih sankcij za neskladnost s ključnimi zahtevami Raven izračuna znižanj je sistematično vključena na področje revizij Komisije in se spremlja v postopku potrditve obračunov.
Applying reductions of less than 100 euro requires burdensome administration without a real deterrent effect. 
Uporaba znižanj, manjših od 100 EUR, je obre-menilna za upravo, pri čemer nima dejanskega odvračilnega učinka.
The 2007 report therefore proposed not to apply such reductions, however with certain limitations and the obligation to follow up the infringements in years to come — although the application of this rule could exclude a significant number of farmers from reductions, but only for the first infringement. 
Poročilo iz leta 2007 je torej predlagalo, naj se takšna znižanja ne uporabljajo, vendar ob nekaterih omejitvah in z obveznim spremljanjem kršitev v naslednjih letih, čeprav bi uporaba tega pravila iz znižanj izključila veliko kmetov, ampak le za prvo kršitev.
In case of repeated non compliance, this rule should not apply and the farmer would face a higher reduction, with a real deterrent effect. 
V primeru ponovljene neskladnosti to pravilo ne velja, pri čemer bi se moralo za kmeta uporabiti večje znižanje z dejanskim odvračilnim učinkom.
The Commission has organised a number of meetings of the experts group on cross compliance as well as a number of workshops to discuss, compare and allow benchmarking of the calculation of reductions. 
Komisija je organizirala več srečanj strokovnih skupin o navzkrižni skladnosti ter več delavnic za razpravo, primerjavo in zagotovitev primerjalne analize za izračun znižanj.
However when Member States did not set the reduction scale at a sufficient level, this is considered as a failure to apply properly the legislation and the cases found are followed up under the clearance of accounts procedure. 
Vendar ko države članice ravni znižanja ne določijo ustrezno, se to obravnava kot nepravilno izvajanje zakonodaje in ugotovljeni primeri se spremljajo v postopku potrditve obračunov.
The data communicated by Member States reflects the situation existing during the year concerned. 
Podatki, ki jih sporočajo države članice, kažejo na položaj v zadevnem letu.
Of course if the situation changes, e.g. a change of the legislation or the inclusion of new farmers in the system of cross compliance, the figures will evolve the following year but it does not put in question the fact that data are comparable. 
Če se položaj spremeni, na primer s spremembo zakonodaje ali vključitvijo novih kmetov v sistem navzkrižne skladnosti, se bodo številke naslednje leto seveda spremenile, ampak zaradi tega primerljivost podatkov še ni vprašljiva.
The Commission improves the templates for the communication of statistics every year and is ready to continue, taking into account the limitation that the administrative burden at Member State level should be reasonable. 
Komisija vsako leto izboljša obrazce za sporočanje statističnih podatkov in si je za to pripravljena še naprej prizadevati ob upoštevanju omejitve, da mora biti upravna obremenitev na ravni držav članic razumna.
The statistics are analysed by the Commission services, which if appropriate launch desk audits on this basis. 
Službe Komisije analizirajo statistične podatke in po potrebi na tej podlagi sprožijo revizije na davčnih uradih.
However, it cannot be expected from the annual statistics to give a detailed view and quantification of all kinds of non-compliance which can occur in every Member State. 
Vendar ni mogoče pričakovati, da bodo letni statistični podatki zagotovili natančen pregled in količinsko opredelitev vseh vrst neskladnosti, ki se lahko pojavijo v vseh državah članicah.
As regards the representativity of the farms selected, the Commission introduced in Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 the obligation to have both a risk and a random part in the sample which should ensure good representativity of the sample. 
Kar zadeva zastopanost izbranih kmetij, je Komisija v Uredbo (ES) št. 796/2004 vključila obveznost, da sta v vzorcu elementa tveganja in naključne izbire, kar bi moralo zagotoviti dobro reprezentativnost vzorca.
However it remains necessary that the main part of the sample be risk-based, in order to make the checks more effective. 
Vendar je še vedno nujno, da glavni del vzorca temelji na analizi tveganja, zato da bi bili pregledi učinkovitejši.
The Council Regulation does not distinguish between formal and substantial non compliances as mentioned by the Court. 
Uredba Sveta ne razlikuje med formalno in vsebinsko neskladnostjo, kot ju je navedlo Sodišče.
The level of reduction depends on the ‘severity’, ‘extent’, ‘permanence’ and ‘repetition’ of the finding. 
Stopnja znižanja je odvisna od „resno-sti“, „obsega“, „trajnosti“ in „ponavljanja“ ugotovitve.
Box 5 — Examples of incomplete and inaccurate reporting23 All the facts mentioned will be analysed by the Commission with a view to improve the statistics for the coming period. 
Okvir 5 – Primeri necelovitega in netočnega poročanja23 Komisija bo vsa navedena dejstva analizirala, da se izboljšajo statistični podatki v prihodnjem obdobju.
In general, at all audit missions Member States have to provide the Commission data in relation to all checks performed by the Member State (amongst others: kind of checks performed on requirement/standard level, reduction(s) applied). 
Na splošno morajo države članice v vseh revizijah Komisiji predložiti podatke v zvezi z vsemi pregledi, ki jih je opravila država članica (med drugim vrste pregledov, opravljenih na ravni zahtev/standardov, uporabljeno(-a) znižanje(-a)).
These data are analysed and it is checked if they correspond to the statistics provided. 
Ti podatki se analizirajo in preverijo, ali so skladni s predloženimi statističnimi podatki.
All differences should be explained by the Member State and potentially the statistics need to be adapted. 
Država članica mora pojasniti vse razlike in po potrebi je treba statistične podatke prilagoditi.
The first cross compliance statistics were related to claim year 2005. 
Prvi statistični podatki o navzkrižni skladnosti so zadevali leto zahtevka 2005.
The Commission considers that, through the number of reductions applied, they give a useful overview of the level of compliance of farmers throughout the EU. 
Komisija meni, da s številom uporabljenih znižanj zagotavljajo koristen pregled stopnje skladnosti kmetov po vsej EU.
In this respect, a significant improvement is already introduced from claim year 2007: the statistics will allow the calculation of the error rate in monetary terms (percentage of cross compliance reductions relative to the payments made to the cross compliance control sample), for each Member State. 
V zvezi s tem se je za leto zahtevka 2007 že uvedla pomembna izboljšava: statistični podatki bodo omogočili izračun stopnje napak v denarnem smislu (odstotek znižanj v okviru navzkrižne skladnosti glede na plačila, izvedena v kontrolnem vzorcu navzkrižne skladnosti) za vsako državo članico.
As early as in 2007 an evaluation study24 was carried out. 
Ocenjevalna študija24 je bila izvedena že leta 2007.
In this context, available data on inspections and aid reductions were considered helpful to monitor progress and to report on achievements against the intended objectives of cross compliance. 
V tem smislu so bili razpoložljivi podatki o inšpekcijskih pregledih in znižanjih pomoči koristni za spremljanje napredka ter poročanje o dosežkih glede na zastavljene cilje navzkrižne skladnosti.
23 The examples are based on the most recent available data at the time of the audit, which was 2006, except for Greece where the most recent data concerned 2005. 
23 Ti primeri temeljijo na najnovejših razpoložljivih podatkih v času revizije, ki so se nanašali na leto 2006, razen za Grčijo, za katero so se najnovejši podatki nanašali na leto 2005.
24 Evaluation of the application of cross compliance as foreseen under Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
24 Ocena izvajanja navzkrižne skladnosti v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1782/2003.
Data on inspections and aid reductions are available. 
Na voljo so podatki o inšpekcijskih pregledih in znižanjih pomoči.
They were considered as useful performance indicators for monitoring the achievements of cross compliance objectives in the context of the external evaluation carried out in 200725. 
Upoštevali so se kot koristni kazalniki uspešnosti pri spremljanju dosežkov glede ciljev navzkrižne skladnosti za zunanjo oceno, ki je bila izvedena leta 200725.
Cross compliance was introduced in 2005. 
Navzkrižna skladnost je bila uvedena leta 2005.
Therefore no information in relation to cross compliance may be available before that date. 
Zato pred tem datumom ni na voljo nobenih informacij v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo.
Information concerning the number of checks and the number of infringements are available only as from 2005 and this year represents the baseline level. 
Informacije o številu pregledov in številu kršitev so na voljo le od leta 2005, ki pomeni izhodiščno raven.
The Commission considers that the • data communicated by Member States constitutes a reliable baseline: they allow comparison between Member States and over time. 
Komisija meni, da so podatki, ki jih pošljejo države članice, zanesljivo izhodišče, ker omogočajo primerjavo med državami članicami in različnimi časovnimi obdobji.
An external evaluation study on cross compliance was carried out in 200726, including the definition of operational, specific and general objectives. 
Leta 2007 je bila izvedena zunanja ocenjevalna študija o navzkrižni skladnosti26, vključno z opredelitvijo operativnih, posebnih in splošnih ciljev.
In this context, available monitoring data were considered as useful indicators for monitoring the achievements of cross compliance against its intended objectives. 
V zvezi s tem so se razpoložljivi podatki o spremljanju obravnavali kot koristni kazalniki za spremljanje dosežkov navzkrižne skladnosti glede na zastavljene cilje.
The Commission believes also that the scope of cross compliance is well defined at EU level. 
Komisija je prepričana tudi, da je obseg navzkrižne skladnosti na ravni EU dobro opredeljen.
It consists of the relevant set of legal acts in the areas covered and a set of standards for good agricultural and environmental condition as well as for the maintenance of the amount of land under permanent pasture. The Commission considers that the objectives of cross compliance are “SMART”. 
Sestavljata ga ustrezen sklop pravnih aktov na vključenih področjih ter sklop standardov za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje in ohranjanje obsega zemljišč, ki so se uporabljala kot trajni travniki. • Komisija meni, da so cilji navzkrižne skladnosti skladni z načeli „SMART“.
The general objectives of cross compliance is defined in the Council Regulation. 
Splošni cilji navzkrižne skladnosti so opredeljeni v Uredbi Sveta.
The Commission has further specified its view 27 COM(2007)147. 
Komisija je svoje stališče glede ciljev navzkrižne skladnosti dodatno opredelila v poročilu iz leta 200727.
29 Evaluation of the application of cross compliance as foreseen under Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. 
29 Ocena izvajanja navzkrižne skladnosti v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1782/2003.
The Commission has proposed in its 2007 report30 improvements of the legal framework, which have been agreed by the Member States. 
Komisija je v poročilu iz leta 200730 predlagala izboljšanje pravnega okvira, s čimer so se države članice strinjale.
Therefore, the complexity is not a consequence of the introduction of cross compliance. • The simplification of the legal framework is always a priority for the Commission. 
Zapletenost torej ni posledica uvedbe navzkrižne skladnosti. • Poenostavitev pravnega okvira je za Komisijo vedno prednostna naloga.
This is the reason why the legislator has deliberately decided to use the most relevant part of the existing legislation at EU level and to add under cross compliance a link with CAP payments. • The Commission assesses independently from cross compliance the requirements under SMRs defined by the Member States in the framework of the implementation of the specific legislation of the areas concerned (environment, health, etc.). 
Zato se je zakonodajalec namerno odločil, da bo uporabil najustreznejši del obstoječe zakonodaje na ravni EU in pri navzkrižni skladnosti dodal povezavo s plačili SKP. • Komisija neodvisno od navzkrižne skladnosti ocenjuje zahteve na podlagi predpisanih zahtev ravnanja, ki jih države članice opredelijo pri izvajanju posebne zakonodaje na zadevnih področjih (okolje, zdravje itd.).
Failures found with regards to the legal obligations of the Member States are followed up according to the procedures available to the Commission, where appropriate (clearance of accounts and infringement procedures). 
Neizpolnitev pravnih obveznosti držav članic se po potrebi spremlja na podlagi postopkov, ki so na voljo Komisiji (potrditev obračunov in postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev).
Cross compliance is defined in the legislation and as a matter of consistency it is applied the same way both for EAGF and Rural Development. 
Navzkrižna skladnost je opredeljena v zakonodaji ter se zaradi skladnosti za EKJS in razvoj podeželja uporablja enako.
It forms a common and clear basis for Member States and provides comparative ground. 
Državam članicam omogoča skupno in jasno podlago ter zagotavlja primerjavo.
Cross compliance represents the demarcation line between penalising farmers for the non-compliance with mandatory requirements (in line with the “polluter pays principle”) and rewarding farmers for the voluntary provision of environmental benefits through agri-environmental or animal welfare commitments. 
Navzkrižna skladnost pomeni razmejitveno točko med kaznovanjem kmetov zaradi neizpolnjevanja obveznih zahtev (v skladu z načelom „plača povzročitelj obremenitve“) in nagrajevanjem kmetov za prostovoljno zagotavljanje koristi za okolje s kmetijsko-okoljskimi obveznostmi ali obveznostmi za dobro počutje živali.
Thus, cross compliance and agri-environment or animal welfare measures complement each other without any possible overlap. • The proposal for changing the scope of cross compliance made in the course of the “health check” exercise is based on a full impact assessment. • The Member States are obliged, pursuant to the current legislation, to define precise obligations at farm level, as well as the corresponding reduction matrices, and communicate them to farmers in a consistent manner. 
Tako se navzkrižna skladnost ter kmetijsko-okoljske obveznosti ali obveznosti za dobro počutje živali dopolnjujejo in se ne morejo prekrivati. • Predlog za spremembo obsega navzkrižne skladnosti, vložen med izvajanjem „pregleda zdravstvenega stanja“, temelji na celoviti oceni učinka. • Države članice morajo v skladu s sedanjo zakonodajo natančno opredeliti obveznosti na ravni kmetij in ustrezne matrice znižanja ter jih usklajeno sporočiti kmetom.
30 COM(2007)147. 
30 COM(2007) 147.
56 • The introduction of cross compliance has allowed for harmonising requirements at EU level and for aligning provisions with the EAGF, thus producing important benefits. 
56 • Uvedba navzkrižne skladnosti je omogočila usklajevanje zahtev na ravni EU in usklajevanje določb z EKJS, kar je bilo zelo koristno.
The Commission considers that important requirements of good farming practice still apply in cross compliance. • A significant degree of flexibility must be offered to Member States to allow them to adapt the obligations to the specific characteristics of the areas concerned. 
Ta diskrecijska pravica državam članicam omogoča, da upoštevajo nacionalne in regionalne posebnosti. • Državam članicam je treba zagotoviti visoko raven prilagodljivosti, da se jim omogoči prilagajanje obveznosti posebnim značilnostim zadevnih območij.
The respect by Member States of a minimum level-playing field is however ensured by the Commission through its monitoring and audit activity. 
Vendar s spremljanjem in revizijsko dejavnostjo zagotavlja, da države članice spoštujejo najnižje pogoje, ki vzpostavljajo enake razmere za vse.
Moreover, the rural development policy is based on programming periods and national programmes are approved, not • individual standards. 
Poleg tega politika razvoja podeželja temelji na programskih obdobjih, zato se odobrijo nacionalni programi in ne posamezni standardi.
The principle that Member States shall • define verifiable standards is already underlying the legislation on cross compliance. • There should be no overlap between cross compliance and agri-environmental commitments. 
Zakonodaja o navzkrižni skladnosti že temelji na načelu, da države članice določijo preverljive standarde. • Med navzkrižno skladnostjo in kmetijsko-okoljskimi obveznostmi ne sme biti nobenega prekrivanja.
This has been checked during the programme approval process. 
To se je preverjalo med postopkom odobritve programov.
Member states had to prove that the agri-environment measures go beyond the baseline as defined by Article 39 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. 
Države članice so morale dokazati, da kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi presegajo osnovno raven, kot je opredeljena v členu 39(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
In other words, cross compliance represents the delineation between penalising farmers for the non-compliance with mandatory requirements (in line with the “polluter pays principle”) and rewarding farmers for the voluntary provision of environmental benefits through agri-environmental commitments. 
To pomeni, da navzkrižna skladnost pomeni razmejitveno točko med kaznovanjem kmetov zaradi neizpolnjevanja obveznih zahtev (v skladu z načelom „plača povzročitelj obremenitve“) in nagrajevanjem kmetov za prostovoljno zagotavljanje koristi za okolje s kmetijsko-okoljskimi obveznostmi.
The Commission has agreed to this request and consequently adopted new rules in 2007 allowing this flexibility. • The principle that possible reductions are proportional to or dependent on the seriousness of the breach is already laid down in the current legislation on cross compliance. 
Komisija se je s to zahtevo strinjala in tako leta 2007 sprejela nova pravila, ki omogočajo to prilagodljivost. • Načelo, da so mogoča znižanja sorazmerna z resnostjo kršitve ali odvisna od nje, je že določeno v sedanji zakonodaji o navzkrižni skladnosti.
57 89. • The Commission is currently examining the question of monitoring. • The Commission follows up where data is missing or is inconsistent. • Regarding the analysis of data the Commission has made considerable efforts for analysing the cross compliance statistics. 
57 89. • Komisija zdaj obravnava vprašanje spremljanja. • Komisija spremlja primere manjkajočih ali neskladnih podatkov. • Kar zadeva analizo podatkov, si je Komisija odločno prizadevala za analizo statističnih podatkov o navzkrižni skladnosti.
The instrument of cross compliance, agreed by the Council and Parliament in 2003 and phased in from 2005, was completely new and obliged a number of Member States to increase and reorganise their efforts to better implement and control the relevant Directives and Regulations at farmer level. 
Instrument navzkrižne skladnosti, o katerem sta se Svet in Parlament sporazumela leta 2003 in se od leta 2005 postopno uvaja, je bil popolnoma nov in zaradi njega si je moralo več držav članic začeti bolj in na drugačen način prizadevati za boljše izvajanje in kontrolo ustreznih direktiv in uredb na ravni kmetij.
Difficulties in the implementation of cross compliance stem from the reorganisation of control bodies, from the identification of controllable obligations relating to farming activities in the different Directives and Regulations, and from sometimes an incomplete conversion of such Directives into national law. 
Težave pri izvajanju navzkrižne skladnosti izhajajo iz preoblikovanja kontrolnih organov, določitve preverljivih obveznosti v zvezi s kmetijsko dejavnostjo v različnih direktivah in uredbah ter občasno nepopolnega prenosa teh direktiv v nacionalno zakonodajo.
The Commission services, together with Member States, have been very active in harmonising application at Member State level and guidelines were produced to improve identification of obligations to be respected at farm level. 
Službe Komisije in države članice so bile zelo dejavne pri usklajevanju izvajanja na ravni držav članic, poleg tega so se pripravila navodila za izboljšanje določevanja obveznosti, ki jih treba izpolnjevati na ravni kmetij.
Cross compliance has certainly contributed to a better respect of the relevant environment, food safety, health, and animal welfare Directives and Regulations. 
Navzkrižna skladnost je zagotovo prispevala k boljšemu izpolnjevanju ustreznih direktiv in uredb na področju okolja, varnosti hrane, zdravja in dobrega počutja živali.
However the Commission aknowledges that the effectiveness of cross compliance could be further improved and sees the best way to achieve this in pursuing and reinforcing the efforts already initiated. 
Vendar Komisija priznava, da je mogoče uspešnost navzkrižne skladnosti dodatno izboljšati, ter meni, da je najboljši način za to nadaljevanje in okrepitev že začetega prizadevanja.
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 8/2008 Is cross compliance an effective policy? 
Evropsko računsko sodišče Posebno poročilo št. 8/2008 Ali je navzkrižna skladnost uspešna politika?
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2009 — 57 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-117-2 DOI 10.2865/34445 
Luxembourg: Urad za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti 2009 – 57 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978–92–9207–129-5 DOI 10.2865/38670
UNDER THE NEW COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY CAP, WHICH ENTERED INTO FORCE IN 2005, THE SINGLE PAYMENTS DUE TO EACH BENEFICIARY MAY BE REDUCED IF RULES IN THE AREAS OF ENVIRONMENT, FOOD SAFETY, ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH AND ANIMAL WELFARE HAVE NOT BEEN RESPECTED, OR IF THE REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN ALL AGRICULTURAL LAND IN GOOD AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION HAS NOT BEEN FULFILLED. 
ODKAR JE LETA 2005 ZAČELA VELJATI NOVA SKUPNA KMETIJSKA POLITIKA SKP, SE LAHKO ENOTNA PLAČILA ZA VSAKEGA UPRAVIČENCA ZMANJŠAJO, ČE TA NE SPOŠTUJE PRAVIL NA PODROČJIH OKOLJA, VARNOSTI HRANE, ZDRAVJA ŽIVALI IN RASTLIN TER DOBREGA POČUTJA ŽIVALI, ALI NE IZPOLNJUJE ZAHTEVE PO OBDELOVANJU VSEH KMETIJSKIH ZEMLJIŠČ V SKLADU Z DOBRIMI KMETIJSKIMI IN OKOLJSKIMI POGOJI.
IN 2008 THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS CARRIED OUT AN AUDIT OF THE CROSS COMPLIANCE POLICY AT THE COMMISSION AND IN SEVEN MEMBER STATES REPRESENTING THE DIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE ACROSS EUROPE. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE JE LETA 2008 IZVEDLO REVIZIJO POLITIKE NAVZKRIŽNE SKLADNOSTI NA KOMISIJI IN V SEDMIH DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH, KI PREDSTAVLJAJO KMETIJSKO RAZNOLIKOST EVROPE.
IN THIS REPORT, THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT THE OBJECTIVES OF THE POLICY HAVE NOT BEEN DEFINED IN A SPECIFIC, MEASURABLE, RELEVANT, AND REALISTIC WAY. 
SODIŠČE JE V TEM POROČILU PRIŠLO DO ZAKLJUČKA, DA CILJI TE POLITIKE NISO BILI OPREDELJENI SPECIFIČNO, MERLJIVO, USTREZNO IN STVARNO.
OVERALL, THE COURT CONSIDERS THAT CROSS COMPLIANCE IS A VITAL ELEMENT OF THE CAP BUT CONCLUDES THAT IT IS NOT EFFECTIVE AS CURRENTLY MANAGED AND IMPLEMENTED. 
NA SPLOŠNO SODIŠČE MENI, DA JE NAVZKRIŽNA SKLADNOST KLJUČNI SESTAVNI DEL SKP, VENDAR MENI, DA NJENO TRENUTNA UPRAVLJANJE IN IZVAJANJE NISTA USPEŠNI.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS ISBN 978-92-9207-117-2 QJ-AB-08-007-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE ISBN 978-92-9207-129-5 QJ-AB-08-007-SL-C
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS EN THE INSTRUMENT FOR STRUCTURAL POLICIES FOR PREACCESSION ISPA, 200006 Special Report No 12 2008 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE SL INSTRUMENT STRUKTURNIH POLITIK V PREDPRISTOPNEM OBDOBJU ISPA 20002006 Posebno poročilo št. 12 2008