natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is, however, not possible to establish an estimate of the scale of the undetected level of fraud which is reliable and defendable enough for evidence-based policy, also taking into account the constraint of the efficient use of the limited resources available to the Commission. a) The Commission partially accepts recommendation 1 a). 
Vendar pa ni mogoče dobiti ocene obsega neodkrite ravni goljufij, ki bi bila dovolj zanesljiva in utemeljena za z dokazi podprto politiko, tako da bi se upoštevala tudi omejitev učinkovite uporabe omejenih virov, ki jih ima na voljo Komisija. (a) Komisija delno sprejema priporočilo 1(a).
The Commission agrees to enhance IMS further, subject to a feasibility study and availability of resources. 
Komisija se strinja, da bo dodatno okrepila sistem za upravljanje nepravilnosti, in sicer ob upoštevanju študije izvedljivosti in razpoložljivosti sredstev.
The inclusion of all spending areas may imply significant development costs and may impact significantly on the overall performance of IMS. 
Vključitev vseh področij porabe lahko pomeni precejšnje stroške razvoja in lahko bistveno vpliva na splošno učinkovitost sistema za upravljanje nepravilnosti.
It would also require legislative proposals. 
Prav tako bi bili potrebni zakonodajni predlogi.
From the Commission’s point of view, integrating completed OLAF investigations should in principle be possible. 
Po mnenju Komisije bi morala biti vključitev končanih preiskav urada OLAF načeloma mogoča.
However, due to data protection rules and confidentiality requirements, ongoing investigations would have to be excluded. 
Vendar pa bi morale biti zaradi pravil o varstvu podatkov in zahtev glede zaupnosti izključene preiskave, ki so v teku.
Also for completed investigations, reporting should be done by the Member States in order to ensure that national confidentiality rules on criminal investigations are respected. 
Kar zadeva končane preiskave, bi morale o njih poročati države članice, da se zagotovi upoštevanje nacionalnih pravil o zaupnosti v zvezi s kazenskimi preiskavami.
Furthermore, as regards investigations by the future EPPO, it is not up to the Commission to make any commitment. 
Poleg tega, kar zadeva preiskave prihodnjega EJT, ni naloga Komisije, da sprejme kakršno koli zavezo.
It should also be pointed out that the Commission proposed in 2014 abolishing the threshold of EUR 10000 as of which Member States must report investigations concerning fraudulent irregularities in IMS. 
Prav tako je treba poudariti, da je Komisija v letu 2014 predlagala odpravo praga 10 000 EUR, od katerega morajo države članice v sistemu za upravljanje nepravilnosti poročati o preiskavah v zvezi z nepravilnostmi, ki pomenijo goljufijo.
Member States, however, rejected this proposal. b) The Commission partially accepts recommendation 1 b). 
Vendar so države članice ta predlog zavrnile. (b) Komisija delno sprejema priporočilo 1(b).
The Commission intends to enhance the analysis of the risks of fraud and corruption against the EU budget, including the analysis of the nature and causes of fraud. 
Komisija namerava izboljšati analizo tveganj goljufije in korupcije v zvezi s proračunom EU, vključno z analizo narave in vzrokov goljufij.
In this context, risk indicators could be identified. 
V okviru tega bi bilo mogoče opredeliti kazalnike tveganja.
The methods suggested by the ECA (encounter surveys and indexes based on administrative data) are, however, not suitable for the EU budget and their cost would not be justified in relation to the expected results. 
Vendar metode, ki jih predlaga Evropsko računsko sodišče (ankete o srečevanju s tema pojavoma in indeksi na podlagi upravnih podatkov), niso primerne za proračun EU, njihovi stroški pa glede na pričakovane rezultate ne bi bili upravičeni.
While the Commission's anti-fraud strategies currently use few measurable objectives and indicators, general principles and priorities set out in anti-fraud strategies contribute to a coherent approach in the Commission's fight against fraud (see Commission replies to paragraphs 59–64). 
Čeprav se v strategijah Komisije za boj proti goljufijam trenutno uporablja malo merljivih ciljev in kazalnikov, splošna načela in prednostne naloge, določeni v strategijah za boj proti goljufijam, prispevajo k doslednemu pristopu v boju Komisije proti goljufijam (glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke 59–64).
Reporting on the effectiveness of both the corporate and the departmental anti-fraud strategies will 26 
Poročanje o učinkovitosti internih in tudi oddelčnih strategij za boj proti goljufijam se bo izboljšalo, ko bo začela delovati izboljšana funkcija analize, omenjena v odgovoru Komisije na priporočilo 1.
Strategic fraud risk management and fraud prevention are important objectives for the Commission. 
Strateško obvladovanje tveganja goljufij in preprečevanje goljufij sta za Komisijo pomembna cilja.
It has put in place a decentralised model of financial management, where Authorising Officers by Delegation, e.g. Directors-General, are responsible for internal control, including risk management and fraud prevention. 
Vzpostavila je decentraliziran model finančnega upravljanja, po katerem so odredbodajalci na podlagi prenosa pooblastil, npr. generalni direktorji, odgovorni za notranji nadzor, vključno z obvladovanjem tveganj in preprečevanjem goljufij.
Respective responsibilities and duties are well defined and since 2017, all Commission services are obliged to appoint a senior manager in charge of risk management, to support and advise the Authorising Officer by Delegation on matters of internal control, including fraud risk management. 
Posamezne odgovornosti in dolžnosti so dobro opredeljene in od leta 2017 morajo vse službe Komisije imenovati višjega vodstvenega delavca, pristojnega za obvladovanje tveganj, ki pomaga odredbodajalcu na podlagi prenosa pooblastil in mu svetuje v zvezi z zadevami notranjega nadzora, vključno z obvladovanjem tveganja goljufij.
Information on anti-fraud measures are reported to the College of Commissioners which takes overall political responsibility for the management of the EU budget. 
Informacije o ukrepih za boj proti goljufijam se sporočajo kolegiju komisarjev, ki prevzema splošno politično odgovornost za upravljanje proračuna EU.
Each Member of the Commission receives fraud-related information directly by the service under his/her responsibility and reports important cases to the College. 
Vsak član Komisije prejme informacije, povezane z goljufijami, neposredno od službe, za katero je odgovoren, in o pomembnih primerih poroča kolegiju.
The individual mission letters by the President of the Commission are committing each Commissioner to pay specific attention to sound financial management of EU funds which reinforces the Commission's political commitment to zero tolerance for fraud and to systematically ensure the protection of the EU budget from fraud. 
Posamezne poslanice predsednika Komisije vsakega Komisarja zavezujejo, da namenja posebno pozornost dobremu finančnemu upravljanju sredstev EU, s čimer se krepi politična zavezanost Komisije ničelni toleranci do goljufij in sistematični zaščiti proračuna EU pred goljufijami.
OLAF’s oversight role is being considered in the ongoing update of the CAFS. Recommendation 2 – Ensure leadership of the Commission’s anti-fraud actions The Commission considers that its current internal organisation in practical terms already reflects the recommendation 2.1. 
Priporočilo 2 – Zagotoviti je treba vodenje ukrepov Komisije za boj proti goljufijam Komisija meni, da se priporočilo 2.1 v praktičnem smislu upošteva že z njeno sedanjo notranjo ureditvijo.
The Commission partially accepts recommendation 2.2 The Commission accepts most of the substance of the recommendation. 
Komisija delno sprejema priporočilo 2.2. Komisija sprejema večino vsebine tega priporočila.
The Commission estimates that its anti-fraud strategy can only gradually be adapted to comply with the recommendation, the full implementation of which could be achieved around the mid-point of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021–2027. 
Komisija meni, da je mogoče le postopno prilagajanje njene strategije za boj proti goljufijam v skladu s priporočilom, katerega polno izvajanje bi bilo lahko doseženo približno na sredini večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2021–2027.
First indent: The Commission shares the ECA’s view that its anti-fraud strategy should be preceded by a comprehensive fraud risk assessment. 
Prva alinea: Komisija se strinja z mnenjem Evropskega računskega sodišča, da bi morala njena strategija za boj proti goljufijam temeljiti na celoviti oceni tveganja goljufij.
The implementation of such a fraud risk assessment would however take time and have important resource implications as it would require not only the establishment of an enhanced analysis function, as referred to in the Commission’s reply to recommendation 1, but also the pursuit of appropriate data collection and analysis over several years (see Commission's replies to paragraphs 14–16, 29, 33–37, 47). 
Vendar bi bil za izvedbo take ocene tveganja potreben čas, poleg tega bi imela pomembne posledice za vire, saj bi zahtevala ne le uvedbo izboljšane funkcije analize, kot je navedeno v odgovoru Komisije na priporočilo 1, ampak tudi večletno zbiranje in analizo ustreznih podatkov (glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke 14–16, 29, 33–37 in 47).
The Commission notes that, to a considerable extent, for the 2014–2020 period fraud-proofing was carried out at the sub-legislative level, notably by drafting model contracts and agreements. 
Komisija navaja, da je zagotavljanje neprepustnosti za goljufije v obdobju 2014–2020 potekalo predvsem na podzakonodajni ravni, zlasti s pripravo vzorčnih pogodb in sporazumov.
Furthermore, in shared management, clear provisions have been in place concerning irregularities, of which fraud is a sub-category. 
Poleg tega so bile pri deljenem upravljanju uvedene jasne določbe v zvezi z nepravilnostmi, med katerimi so goljufije ena od podkategorij.
See Commission's reply to paragraph 67. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 67.
With the “Better Regulation Toolbox” of 2017 (see Commission's replies to paragraphs 71 and 72 above), fraud-proofing was formally integrated in the legislative drafting process. Nevertheless, 27 
Z „zbirko orodij za boljše pravno urejanje“ iz leta 2017 (glej odgovora Komisije na točki 71 in 72 zgoraj) je bilo zagotavljanje neprepustnosti za goljufije formalno vključeno v postopek priprave zakonodaje.
fraud-proofing of spending programmes was already required under the Commission Anti-Fraud Strategy of 2011,11 i.e. for the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014–2020. 
v okviru strategije Komisije za boj proti goljufijam iz leta 2011,11 tj. za večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2014–2020.
The 2021–2027 Multiannual Financial Framework proposal of the Commission on the Common Provisions Regulation contains a provision requiring the authority responsible for managing the programme to "put in place effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures and procedures, taking account of the risks identified". 
Predlog Komisije za večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2021–2027 v zvezi z uredbo o skupnih določbah vsebuje določbo, s katero se od organa, pristojnega za upravljanje programa, zahteva, da „uvede učinkovite in sorazmerne ukrepe in postopke za boj proti goljufijam, pri čemer upošteva ugotovljena tveganja“.
This provision, Article 68(1)(c), applies to the seven shared management funds. 
Ta določba, člen68(1)(c), se uporablja za sedem skladov deljenega upravljanja.
Under shared management, it is up to Member States to take all necessary measures to protect the EU financial interests, in particular those preventing, detecting and correcting irregularities and fraud, as appropriate and on their own responsibility. 
V okviru deljenega upravljanja je naloga držav članic, da sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zaščito finančnih interesov EU, zlasti ukrepe za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in opravljanje nepravilnosti in goljufij, kot je ustrezno in na njihovo lastno odgovornost.
In this respect, they have access to the exclusion decisions taken as part of EDES. 
V zvezi s tem imajo dostop do odločb o izključitvi, sprejetih v okviru sistema za zgodnje odkrivanje in izključitev.
As far as the feeding of information into EDES is concerned, national authorities have to transmit information of detected fraud and/or irregularity, where required by sector-specific rules. 
Kar zadeva posredovanje informacij v sistem za zgodnje odkrivanje in izključitev, morajo nacionalni organi poslati informacije o odkriti goljufiji in/ali nepravilnosti, kadar se to zahteva s sektorskimi pravili.
See also Commission's reply to paragraph 138. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 138.
The Commission is continuously promoting the use of ARACHNE with the Member States (see Commission's replies to paragraphs 85-88 and recommendation 3.3). 
Komisija pri državah članicah nenehno spodbuja uporabo orodja ARACHNE (glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke 85–88 in priporočilo 3.3).
Recommendation 3 – Increase the use of fraud-prevention tools The Commission partially accepts recommendation 3.1. 
Priporočilo 3 – Povečati je treba uporabo orodij za preprečevanje goljufij Komisija delno sprejema priporočilo 3.1.
The package of legislative proposals for the Multiannual Financial Framework was launched in May and June 2018, i.e. before receipt of the ECA’s recommendation. 
Sveženj zakonodajnih predlogov za večletni finančni okvir je bil uveden maja in junija 2018, tj. pred prejetjem priporočila Evropskega računskega sodišča.
Those proposals were fraud-proofed to the extent possible within the tight deadlines for the launch of the MFF package. 
Navedeni predlogi so bili neprepustni za goljufije, kolikor je bilo to mogoče znotraj kratkih rokov za uvedbo svežnja za večletni finančni okvir.
Already under the current MFF Member States are required to put in place effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures taking into account the risk identified, pursuant to Article 125(4)(c) of the Common Provisions Regulation (EU) 1303/2013. 
Države članice morajo že na podlagi sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira uvesti učinkovite in sorazmerne ukrepe za boj proti goljufijam, pri čemer morajo upoštevati opredeljena tveganja, in sicer v skladu s členom 125(4)(c) uredbe o skupnih določbah (EU) 1303/2013.
The Commission considers that a fraud risk assessment is an ongoing exercise, not linked to any particular timeframe. 
Komisija meni, da je ocena tveganja goljufij stalen proces, ki ni vezan na določen časovni okvir.
The Commission's Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) proposal supports the requirement to carry out a fraud risk assessment. 
Predlog Komisije za uredbo o skupnih določbah podpira zahtevo, da se izvede ocena tveganja goljufij.
However, it does not foresee a specific timing from Member States to do it. 
Vendar ne določa, da morajo države članice to storiti v določenem roku.
The Commission is of the opinion that adding a requirement to be met before adoption would delay the programme adoption, which goes against the objective of the CPR. 
Komisija meni, da bi se z dodajanjem zahteve, ki bi morala biti izpolnjena pred sprejetjem programa, njegovo sprejetje zakasnilo, kar je v nasprotju s ciljem uredbe o skupnih določbah.
A study on Member States’ compliance with this provision is being finalised. 
Študija skladnosti držav članic s to določbo se dokončuje.
The Commission is considering reinforcing OLAF’s analytical capabilities, which would, in the course of the 2021-2027 programming period, contribute to a refinement of the Commission's fraud risk assessments (see the Commission’s replies to recommendations 1 and 4). 
Komisija razmišlja o okrepitvi analitičnih zmogljivosti urada OLAF, kar bo v programskem obdobju 2021–2027 prispevalo k izpopolnitvi ocen tveganja goljufij Komisije (glej odgovora Komisije na priporočili 1 in 4).
The Commission accepts recommendation 3.2 a). 
Komisija sprejema priporočilo 3.2(a).
In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the relevant Directorate-General is obliged to use the early detection and exclusion system where the circumstances require it. 
V skladu s finančno uredbo mora zadevni generalni direktorat uporabljati sistem za zgodnje odkrivanje in izključitev, kadar to zahtevajo okoliščine.
The Commission accepts recommendation 3.2 b). 
Komisija sprejema priporočilo 3.2(b).
A modification of the Financial Regulation by the legislator would be necessary in order to oblige, as far as shared management is concerned, the Member States to flag fraudulent economic operators. 
Da bi imele države članice, kar zadeva deljeno upravljanje, obveznost opozarjati na goljufive gospodarske subjekte, bi moral zakonodajalec spremeniti finančno uredbo.
The Commission had initially proposed (COM (2014)358) a clear obligation for the Member States to use IMS data as a ground for exclusion. 
Komisija je prvotno predlagala (COM(2014) 358) jasno obveznost držav članic, da podatke sistema za upravljanje nepravilnosti uporabijo kot razlog za izključitev.
The Commission accepts recommendation 3.3. 
Komisija sprejema priporočilo 3.3.
The Commission has provided information, targeted training and active support and guidance on the ARACHNE tool to all Member States. 
Komisija je vsem državam članicam zagotovila informacije, ciljno usmerjeno usposabljanje ter dejavno podporo in smernice v zvezi s sistemom ARACHNE.
The Commission will continue to provide active assistance to all authorities and encourage those Member States which do not sufficiently (or not at all) use Arachne to do so, as outlined in the "Charter for the introduction an application of the Arachne Risk Scoring Tool in the management verifications" shared with all Member States. 
Komisija bo še naprej dejavno podpirala vse organe in tiste države članice, ki orodja Arachne ne uporabljajo dovolj (ali ga sploh ne uporabljajo), spodbujala k njegovi uporabi, kot je opisano v „Listini za uvedbo orodja ARACHNE za oceno tveganja goljufij pri preverjanjih upravljanja“, s katero so seznanjene vse države članice.
See Commission replies to paragraphs 85–88. 
Glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke 85–88.
With regard to the overall impact of OLAF’s investigations, it is important to note that the precautionary measures issued by OLAF (see Article 7 of Regulation 883/2013) and the overall deterrent effect of OLAF’s actions are also important elements of fighting fraud which need to be assessed. 
Kar zadeva splošni vpliv preiskav urada OLAF, je treba navesti, da so tudi varnostni ukrepi, ki jih izda ta urad (glej člen 7 Uredbe št. 883/2013), in splošni odvračilni učinek njegovega ukrepanja pomembni elementi boja proti goljufijam, ki jih je treba oceniti.
The analysis concerning the follow-up of OLAF’s investigations is based on a relatively small number of interviews with Commission services and Member States judicial authorities. 
Analiza nadaljnjega ukrepanja na podlagi preiskav urada OLAF temelji na razmeroma majhnem številu razgovorov s službami Komisije in pravosodnimi organi držav članic.
The Commission highlights that also other actors, in particular other EU institutions and Member States, have in the current system important roles and responsibilities to detect and investigate irregularities and to take appropriate follow-up measures. 
Komisija poudarja, da imajo tudi drugi akterji, zlasti druge institucije EU in države članice, v sedanjem sistemu pomembne vloge in odgovornosti za odkrivanje in preiskovanje nepravilnosti ter sprejemanje ustreznih nadaljnjih ukrepov.
It is frequent good practice that OLAF and national judicial authorities work in parallel and coordinate their operational activities without losing time. 
Pogosto se šteje za dobro prakso, da urad OLAF in nacionalni pravosodni organi delujejo vzporedno in usklajujejo svoje operativne dejavnosti, ne da bi izgubljali čas.
OLAF has also improved its cooperation with the judicial authorities on the follow-up to its recommendations. 
Urad OLAF je tudi izboljšal svoje sodelovanje s pravosodnimi organi pri nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi njegovih priporočil.
Also, the recent Commission proposal to amend Regulation 883/2013 aims to improve the follow-up to OLAF's judicial recommendations, notably by clarifying the admissibility of OLAF investigation results in judicial proceedings in Member States. See also Commission's replies to paragraphs 94–104. 
883/2013 je namenjen izboljšanju nadaljnjega ukrepanja na podlagi sodnih priporočil urada OLAF, zlasti z razjasnitvijo dopustnosti rezultatov preiskav urada OLAF v sodnih postopkih v državah članicah. Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke 94–104.
OLAF has taken action with the aim of clarifying the information provided in final reports and the content of the recommendations in relation to estimated amounts to be recovered. 
Urad OLAF je sprejel ukrepe, da bi pojasnil informacije iz svojih končnih poročil in vsebino priporočil v zvezi z ocenjenimi zneski za izterjavo.
Furthermore, in July 2017 OLAF issued new "Guidelines on Financial Monitoring" designed inter alia to shorten the period for the spending Directorates-General to calculate the amounts to be recovered. 
Poleg tega je urad OLAF julija 2017 izdal nove „Smernice o finančnem spremljanju“, da bi se med drugim skrajšal čas, ki ga generalni direktorati porabniki potrebujejo za izračun zneskov za izterjavo.
See also Commission's replies to paragraphs 106–124. 29 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke 106–124.
Recommendation 4 – Reconsider OLAF’s role and responsibilities in combatting fraud in EU spending in light of the establishment of the EPPO The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 4 – Ponovno je treba razmisliti o vlogi in odgovornostih urada OLAF v boju proti goljufijam pri porabi EU, odkar je bilo ustanovljeno EJT Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
As regards the investigative function of OLAF, the Commission has taken action to adapt OLAF's framework for investigations to the establishment of the EPPO in its proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, of 23 May 2018, COM(2018)338. 
Kar zadeva preiskovalno funkcijo urada OLAF, je Komisija sprejela ukrepe za prilagoditev njegovega okvira za preiskave ustanovitvi EJT v predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št.
The proposed relationship between the two bodies should be based, as prescribed by the EPPO Regulation, on the principles of close cooperation, exchange of information, complementarity and non-duplication. 
Predlagani odnosi med obema organoma bi morali, kot je predpisano z uredbo o EJT, temeljiti na načelih tesnega sodelovanja, izmenjave informacij, dopolnjevanja in nepodvajanja.
In addition, the proposal foresees targeted changes to enhance the effectiveness of OLAF investigations. 
Poleg tega so v predlogu predvidene ciljno usmerjene spremembe za izboljšanje učinkovitosti preiskav urada OLAF.
OLAF's administrative investigations will maintain their specific added value to the benefit of the overall protection of the Union budget. 
Upravne preiskave urada OLAF bodo ohranile posebno dodano vrednost v korist splošne zaščite proračuna Unije.
See also Commission’s replies to paragraphs 126–128. 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke 126–128.
With regard to fraud prevention and fraud risk analysis, the Commission intends to reinforce OLAF’s role (see Commission's replies to recommendations 1–3). a) The Commission shares the ECA’s view that OLAF could assume a stronger role in the anti-fraud policies of the Commission services and executive agencies. 
Kar zadeva preprečevanje goljufij in analizo tveganja goljufij, Komisija namerava okrepiti vlogo urada OLAF (glej odgovore Komisije na priporočila 1–3). (a) Komisija se strinja z mnenjem Evropskega računskega sodišča, da bi lahko urad OLAF prevzel večjo vlogo v politikah služb in izvajalskih agencij Komisije na področju boja proti goljufijam.