natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following the publication of the above-mentioned communication in May 2006, a political debate has been launched with all the parties concerned on an anti-fraud strategy at European level. 
Po objavi zgoraj navedenega sporočila maja 2006, se je začela politična razprava z vsemi zadevnimi stranmi o strategiji boja proti goljufijam na evropski ravni.
Besides the Standing Committee on Administrative Cooperation (3) Ń whose discussions and decisions have a more technical nature Ń a more policy oriented Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group has been created. 
Poleg Stalnega odbora za upravno sodelovanje (3) – njegove razprave in sklepi so bolj tehnične narave – je bila ustanovljena bolj politično usmerjena Skupina za strategijo boja proti davčnim goljufijam.
Decisions on administrative cooperation at the Community level can only be taken by a unanimous vote of all Member States. 
Sklepe o upravnem sodelovanju na ravni Skupnosti morajo soglasno sprejeti vse države članice.
With regard to the framework for the exchanges of information without prior request, Article 18 of Council Regulation 1798/2003 Ń as confirmed in Article 5 of Commission Regulation 1925/2004 Ń expressly provides that each Member State shall determine whether it will take part in the exchange of a particular (sub)category of information, and how it will do this. 
Glede okvira za izmenjavo informacij brez predhodne zahteve člen 18 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1798/2003 – in kakor je potrjeno v členu 5 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1925/2004 – izrecno določa, da vsaka država članica odloči, ali bo sodelovala pri izmenjavi posamezne (pod)kategorije informacij in način izmenjave.
This text was the result of a political compromise, necessary to obtain unanimity in the Council (as required for acts based on Article 93 of the Treaty). 
To besedilo je rezultat političnega kompromisa, ki je bil potreben za dosego soglasja v Svetu (kakor se zahteva za akte na podlagi člena 93 Pogodbe).
20. 
25.1.2008 OPAŽANJA 20.
Ń Ń The statistics communicated by the Member States show: an increase of information exchange requests amongst the EU-15 in the period after 1.1.2004, compared to the period before that date, and a rapid development of the exchange of information requests between EU-15 and EU-10. 
Statistični podatki, ki so jih posredovale države članice, kažejo: — večje število zahtevkov za izmenjavo informacij med EU-15 v obdobju po 1.1.2004, v primerjavi z obdobjem pred tem datumom, in — hiter razvoj zahtevkov za izmenjavo informacij med EU-15 in EU-10.
(1) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee concerning the need to develop a co-ordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud, COM(2006) 254 of 31.5.2006. 
(1) Sporočilo Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru o potrebi po razvoju usklajene strategije za izboljšanje boja proti davčnim goljufijam, COM(2006) 254 z dne 31.5.2006.
(2) CouncilRegulation(EC)No1798/2003of7October2003onadmin-istrative cooperation in the field of VAT (OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p. 
1798/2003 z dne 7. oktobra 2003 o upravnem sodelovanju na področju davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 264, 15.10.2003, str.
1) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1925/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 concerning administrative cooperation in the field of VAT (OJ L 331, 5.11.2004, p. 
1925/2004 z dne 29. oktobra 2004 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje nekaterih določb Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1798/2003 o upravnem sodelovanju na področju davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 331, 5.11.2004, str.
(3) This Standing Committee on Administrative Cooperation (SCAC) has been established in accordance with Article 44 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 to assist the Commission in implementing the Council Regulation. 
(3) Ta stalni odbor za upravno sodelovanje (SCAC) je bil ustanovljen v skladu s členom 44 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1798/2003, da pomaga Komisiji pri izvajanju Uredbe Sveta.
25.1.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 20/21 21. 
25.1.2008 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 20/21 21.
Despite the increase of the information exchanges, the level of administrative cooperation in these years was not commensurate with the size of intra-Community trade (1). 
Kljub povečanju izmenjav informacij raven upravnega sodelovanja v teh letih ni bila v sorazmerju z obsegom trgovine v Skupnosti (1).
Given the limits of their possibilities (e.g. human resources), Member States attach great interest to controls based on a risk analysis. 
Države članice se zaradi omejenih možnosti (npr. človeških virov) zelo zanimajo za kontrole na podlagi analize tveganja.
The intention of the new legislation was to facilitate decentralisation: more direct contacts between local services can make the administrative cooperation more efficient and faster (2). 
Namen nove zakonodaje je bil olajšati decentralizacijo: bolj neposredni stiki med lokalnimi službami lahko privedejo do učinkovitejšega in hitrejšega upravnega sodelovanja (2).
A secured electronic communication channel between local offices in different Member States will be available from the end of 2007, in order to support such decentralised communication. 
Zavarovan kanal za elektronske komunikacije med lokalnimi uradi v različnih državah članicah bo na voljo od konca leta 2007 dalje in bo podpiral tako decentralizirano komunikacijo.
However, the administrative organisation in the Member States is primarily the responsibility of the Member States. 
Vendar so za upravno organizacijo v državah članicah odgovorne predvsem države članice.
The statistics that are collected annually and presented in the SCAC meetings, reveal a problem of late replies. 
Statistični podatki, ki se zbirajo letno in predstavijo na srečanju SCAC, kažejo na težavo poznih odgovorov.
The Commission is aware of this problem and addresses it repeatedly in these SCAC meetings, urging the Member States to reduce the delays and to provide interim replies when they are unable to reply within the deadlines. 
Komisija se zaveda te težave in ga na srečanjih SCAC vedno izpostavlja in poziva države članice, naj skrajšajo zamude in v primeru, ko ne morejo odgovoriti do roka, pošljejo vmesne odgovore.
The Commission has taken several initiatives to improve this situation. 
Komisija je za izboljšanje tega stanja sprejela več pobud.
These new initiatives relate to: Ń automated direct access to data, Ń more rapid and more detailed information exchange, Ń third Member StatesŐ requests. 
Te nove pobude se nanašajo na: — avtomatičen neposreden dostop do podatkov, — hitrejšo in bolj podrobno izmenjavo informacij, — zahtevke tretjih držav članic.
Discussions with the Member States on these inititatives are ongoing within the Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group. 
V okviru Skupine za strategijo boja proti davčnim goljufijam z državami članicami potekajo razgovori o teh pobudah.
The functioning of the administrative organisation within the Member States is primarily a national issue. 
Delovanje upravne organizacije v državah članicah je predvsem nacionalno vprašanje.
However, the Commission shares this concern expressed by the Court of Auditors and has repeatedly drawn Member StatesŐ attention to it at SCAC meetings. 
Komisija se strinja glede skrbi, ki jo je izrazilo Računsko sodišče, in na srečanjih SCAC države članice na to ves čas opozarja.
In its Communication of May 2006, the Commission also referred to the Council ad hoc group on tax fraud, which had identified the absence of a Community administrative culture as an obstacle to the fight against fraud (3). 
Komisija se je v svojem Sporočilu maja 2006 sklicevala na priložnostno skupino Sveta za davčne goljufije, ki je ugotovila, da je pomanjkanje upravne kulture Skupnosti ovira pri boju proti goljufiji (3).
Local tax offices should use (correctly) the instruments developed to facilitate the administrative cooperation: Ń standard forms have been prepared and agreed upon by the Member States. 
Lokalni davčni uradi bi morali (pravilno) uporabljati instrumente, razvite za olajšanje upravnega sodelovanja: — pripravljeni so bili standardni obrazci, o katerih so se države članice sporazumele.
(1) Cf. COM(2006) 254 of 31.5.2006, point 2.1. 
(1) Glej COM(2006) 254 z dne 31.5.2006, točka 2.1.
(2) The regulation provided for the possibility of decentralised cooperation, following the suggestion made in the CommissionŐs proposal for the regulation (OJ C 270 E, 25.9.2001, p. 
(2) V Uredbi je na pobudo Komisije iz njenega predloga Uredbe predvidena možnost decentraliziranega sodelovanja (UL C 270 E, 25.9.2001, str.
87), COM(2001) 294 of 18.6.2001). 
87) (COM(2001) 294 z dne 18.6.2001).
(3) COM(2006) 254 of 31.5.2006, point 3.1. 
(3) COM(2006) 254 z dne 31.5.2006, točka 3.1.
In addition, new electronic forms in XML format are being developed and will be used from the beginning of 2008. 
Poleg tega se razvijajo novi elektronski obrazci v obliki XML, ki bodo v uporabi od začetka leta 2008.
These forms will be easier to use than the current electronic forms and their structure will not be alterable. 
Ti obrazci bodo bolj enostavni za uporabo kot sedanji elektronski obrazci in njihove strukture ne bo mogoče spreminjati.
The number of mistakes should thus be reduced. Ń the CCN/CSI network enables Member States to have a secure and fast communication between the Central Liaison Offices. 
Tako naj bi se zmanjšalo število napak. — omrežje CCN/CSI državam članicam omogoča varno in hitro komunikacijo med centralnimi uradi za zvezo.
Moreover, a secured electronic communication channel will also be available to local offices as from the end of 2007. 38-42. 
Poleg tega bodo od konca leta 2007 lokalnim uradom na voljo zavarovani kanali za elektronske komunikacije. 38.–42.
The administrative organisation of the competent authorities within the Member States (and the division of their territorial or operational responsibility) is a national competence; it should be in conformity with the EU legislation and it should not hamper the functioning of the administrative cooperation with other Member States. 
Upravna organizacija pristojnih organov v državah članicah (ter razdelitev ozemeljske ali operativne odgovornosti) je v nacionalni pristojnosti; mora pa biti skladna z zakonodajo EU in ne sme ovirati delovanja upravnega sodelovanja z drugimi državami članicami.
The functioning of the national CLO structures will be part of the forthcoming evaluation to be published in 2008. 
Delovanje nacionalnih struktur centralnih uradov za zvezo bo del naslednje ocene, ki bo objavljena leta 2008.
The Commission already suggested the introduction of a feedback mechanism at the SCAC meeting of December 2006. 
Komisija je na srečanju SCAC decembra 2006 že predlagala uvedbo mehanizma povratnih informacij.
This could enhance the motivation for the exchange of (spontaneous) information. 
To bi lahko okrepilo motivacijo za izmenjavo (brez zahtevka) informacij.
Member States showed goodwill to this idea, which will be further explored in 2008. 
Države članice so dobro sprejele to zamisel, ki bo nadalje raziskana v letu 2008.
With regard to the framework for the exchanges of information without prior request, Article 18 of Council Regulation 1798/2003 Ń as confirmed in Article 5 of Regulation 1925/2004 Ń expressly provides that each Member State shall determine whether it will take part in the exchange of a particular (sub)category of information, and how it will do this. 
Glede okvira za izmenjavo informacij brez predhodne zahteve člen 18 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1798/2003 – in kakor je potrjeno v členu 5 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1925/2004 – izrecno določa, da vsaka država članica odloči, ali bo sodelovala pri izmenjavi posamezne (pod)kategorije informacij in način izmenjave.
This particular ÔdefinitionŐ of the (sub)categories of information exchanged without prior request, can be explained by the fact that when this provision was adopted, the availability of these (sub)categories of information was different from Member State to Member State (because of different methods to collect and to store the information concerned). 
To posebno „opredelitev“ (pod)kategorij izmenjave informacij brez predhodne zahteve je mogoče pojasniti z dejstvom, da so bile v času sprejetja te določbe v različnih državah članicah na voljo različne (pod)kategorije informacij (zaradi različnih načinov zbiranja in shranjevanja zadevnih informacij).
Accordingly, it was foreseen that those Member States which were not yet in a position to exchange certain types of information (e.g. because a specific database was still to be developed), would take up the obligation to exchange that information as soon as it was possible (see Article 5, paragraph 2, of Regulation (EC) No 1925/2004, about the subsequent modifications of (sub)categories of information which Member States exchange, and about the subsequent modification of the way in which the information is exchanged). 
Skladno s tem je bilo predvideno, da tiste države članice, ki še niso bile sposobne izmenjavati nekaterih vrst informacij (npr. ker je bilo treba posebne zbirke podatkov šele razviti), prevzamejo odgovornost izmenjavati take informacije takoj, ko bo to mogoče (glej člen 5, odstavek 2, Uredbe (ES) št. 1925/2004 o poznejših spremembah (pod)kategorij informacij, ki jih države članice izmenjujejo, in o poznejših spremembah načina izmenjave informacij).
The aim, expressed in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 and Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1925/2004, was to come to an exchange of information as complete as possible. 
Cilj, izražen v členu 17 Uredbe (ES) št.
C 20/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 25.1.2008 53. 
C 20/22 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 25.1.2008 53.
The functioning of the exchange of information without prior request should be improved. 
Delovanje okvira za izmenjavo informacij brez predhodne zahteve je treba izboljšati.
More efficient methods of exchanging information, taking account of recent technological developments and the equipment used by traders, should be envisaged. 
Treba je predvideti bolj učinkovite načine izmenjave informacij ob upoštevanju tehnološkega razvoja in opreme, ki jo uporabljajo trgovci.
More frequent and more detailed automated exchanges between Member States, or even direct access to national databases, should also be considered (1). 
Treba je preučiti tudi pogostejšo in podrobnejšo avtomatično izmenjavo med državami članicami ali celo neposreden dostop do nacionalnih zbirk podatkov (1).
The discussions on possible ways to improve the use of this tool are currently ongoing within the Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group. 
Trenutno v Skupini za strategijo boja proti davčnim goljufijam potekajo razgovori o možnih načinih za izboljšanje uporabe tega orodja.
The discussion on the use of Eurocanet is a typical example of the use Member States make of this tool. 
Razprava o uporabi Eurocaneta je tipičen primer, kako države članice uporabljajo to orodje.
Furthermore, conclusions of the work carried out by several Fiscalis Project Groups (FPGs) and ongoing discussions within these groups reflect Member StatesŐ desires to improve the use of this tool and to set up a more structured use of this type of exchange of information, e.g. with regard to second hand cars and importations. 
Nadalje sklepi dela, ki so ga opravile številne projektne skupine Fiscalis (FPG), in razprave, ki potekajo v okviru teh skupin, odražajo želje držav članic po izboljšanju uporabe tega orodja in vzpostavitvi bolj strukturirane uporabe te vrste izmenjave informacij, npr. glede rabljenih avtomobilov in uvoza.
As far as statistics are concerned, the Member States have agreed with detailed guidelines and instructions, providing for the communication of more precise statistics on the categories of information that are exchanged without prior request. 
Glede statističnih podatkov so se države članice strinjale s podrobnimi smernicami in navodili, ki predvidevajo posredovanje bolj natančnih statističnih podatkov o kategorijah informacij, ki se izmenjajo brez predhodne zahteve.
These new guidelines should be applied as from 2007 (for the communication of statistical data concerning the requests and replies that are sent and received in 2006). 
Te nove smernice je treba uporabljati od leta 2007 dalje (za posredovanje statističnih podatkov v zvezi z zahtevki in odgovori, poslanimi in prejetimi v letu 2006).
The Eurocanet (European Carousel network) project, in which 22 of 27 Member States participate, has promoted an operational approach enabling the national anti-fraud units to be involved. 
Eurocanet (omrežje European Carousel Network), v katerem sodeluje 22 od 27 držav članic, spodbuja operativni pristop, ki omogoča vključitev nacionalnih enot za boj proti goljufijam.
The data management and the analysis remain with the Member States only. 
Podatke pa upravljajo in analizirajo samo države članice.
The Commission has currently no access to the data and therefore cannot provide any analysis. 
Komisija trenutno nima dostopa do podatkov in zato ne more zagotoviti nobene analize.
As a consequence, the Commission is only able to offer financial and administrative support to enhance the exchange of data between Member States. 
Zato Komisija lahko za krepitev izmenjave podatkov med državami članicami ponudi le finančno in upravno podporo.
However, the Commission would be willing to offer more concrete support, such as e.g. analysis on trends and up-coming schemes at Community level if Member States would ask for it. 
Komisija pa bi bila pripravljena ponuditi bolj konkretno podporo, npr. analizo gibanj in prihodnjih ravnanj na ravni Skupnosti, če bi države članice to zahtevale.
Information concerning intra-Community supplies of goods should be communicated rapidly to other Member States. 
Informacije o dobavah blaga znotraj Skupnosti je treba drugim državam članicam hitro sporočiti.
The data currently exchanged between the Member States have to respect the three months period set in Article 25 of Regulation 1798/2003. 
Podatki, ki jih države članice trenutno izmenjujejo, morajo upoštevati trimesečno obdobje, določeno v členu 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 1798/2003.
Accordingly, the issue of a quicker exchange of data on intra-Community supplies is one of the major elements in the discussions with Member States which have been launched by the CommissionŐs Communication of May 2006. 
Skladno s tem je vprašanje hitrejše izmenjave informacij o dobavah blaga znotraj Skupnosti eden od glavnih elementov v razpravah z državami članicami, ki so se začele s Sporočilom Komisije maja 2006.
The issue was afterwards discussed in the Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group. 
O tem vprašanju je pozneje razpravljala Skupina za strategijo boja proti davčnim goljufijam.
(1) COM(2006) 254 of 31.5.2006, point 5.2. 
(1) COM(2006) 254 z dne 31.5.2006, točka 5.2.
As a result of these discussions, the ECOFIN Council of June 2007 invited the Commisison to come forward with legislative proposals with a view of reducing the timeframes for submitting the recapitualtive statement as well as for exchanging this information between the Member States. 
Zaradi teh razprav je Ekonomsko-finančni svet junija 2007 pozval Komisijo, naj pripravi zakonodajne predloge s ciljem skrajšati časovne okvire za predložitev rekapitulacijskega poročila in za izmenjavo teh informacij med državami članicami.
The Council indicated these proposals need to be accompanied by an impact assessment. 
Svet je navedel, da mora te predloge spremljati ocena učinka.
The Commission is currently carrying out this assessment, in order to evaluate the impact in terms of costs for businesses of such a change. 
Komisija trenutno opravlja to oceno, da se ovrednoti učinek glede stroškov take spremembe za podjetja.
Discussions are currently ongoing with the Member States on automated access for competent authorities to data contained in the databases of other Member States (part of the activities of the Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group). 
Trenutno potekajo razgovori z državami članicami o avtomatičnem dostopu za pristojne organe do podatkov v zbirkah podatkov drugih držav članic (del dejavnosti Skupine za strategijo boja proti davčnim goljufijam).
The access to national databases was already suggested in the CommissionŐs Communication of May 2006, as one of the elements to improve the exchange of information (1). 
Dostop do nacionalnih zbirk podatkov je bil predlagan že v Sporočilu Komisije maja 2006, kot eden od elementov za izboljšanje izmenjave informacij (1).
The advantage of a multilateral approach is shown by the example of the Eurocanet project, mentioned by the Court in paragraph 54, which offers Member States tax investigation services a better insight or even the full picture of a suspected fraud chain. 
Prednost večstranskega pristopa je prikazana s primerom projekta Eurocanet, ki ga Sodišče navaja v odstavku 54, ki omogoča službam držav članic za davčne preiskave boljši vpogled ali celo celovito sliko sumljive verige goljufij.
All Member States participating have access to all data exchanged without limitation. 
Vse sodelujoče države članice imajo neomejen dostop do vseh izmenjanih podatkov.
The issue of imposing reporting obligations for recapitulative statements on intra-Community acquisitions has been discussed in several Fiscalis seminars and project groups. 
Na več seminarjih Fiscalis in v projektnih skupinah so razpravljali o vprašanju obveznosti poročanja za rekapitulacijska poročila o pridobitvah blaga znotraj Skupnosti.
In view of the problems of quality of data and frequent misreporting by traders themselves, the benefits of such an obligation are not demonstrated. 
Glede na težave s kakovostjo podatkov in pogostega napačnega poročanja trgovcev samih, koristi take obveznosti niso dokazane.
In addition, imposing a reporting of intra-Community acquisitions would constitute a serious additional administrative burden for traders. 
Poleg tega bi obveznost poročanja o pridobitvah blaga znotraj Skupnosti za tr-govce pomenila resno dodano upravno obremenitev.
Since 2002, the Commission has made a VIES VAT number validation tool available on its website. 
Od leta 2002 je na spletni strani Komisije na voljo orodje VIES za preverjanje veljavnosti številke DDV.
An open interface is available since 2005, allowing the automatic verification of VAT numbers by computer systems. 
Od leta 2005 je na voljo odprti vmesnik, ki omogoča, da računalniški sistemi samodejno preverjajo veljavnost številke DDV.
The option given by 11 Member States to cross-check VAT ID numbers with names of taxable persons is a useful tool to prevent the abuse of VAT ID numbers. 
Možnost, ki jo je dalo 11 držav članic, da se identifikacijska številka za DDV preverja z imeni davčnih zavezancev, je uporabno orodje za preprečevanje zlorabe identifikacijskih številk za DDV.
At the Standing Committee on Information Technology (SCIT) meeting of June 2007, an agreement was reached to clarify the understanding of the start date and cessation date of taxable personsŐ economic activities in VIES. 69-70. 
Na srečanju Stalnega odbora za informacijsko tehnologijo (SCIT) junija 2007 je bil dosežen sporazum, da se razjasni razumevanje datuma začetka in datuma prenehanja gospodarskih dejavnosti davčnega zavezanca v VIES.
The Commission is working on a modernisation of the VIES system. 
Komisija sodeluje pri posodabljanju sistema VIES.
25.1.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 20/23 The VIES 2 Feasability study, announced at the SCAC meeting of March 2004, proposed a planning for this modernisation. 
25.1.2008 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 20/23 Študija izvedljivosti za VIES 2, objavljena na srečanju SCAC marca 2004, je predlagala načrtovanje te posodobitve.
This planning was however not approved by the Member States. 
Vendar države članice tega načrtovanja niso odobrile.
A particular problem was raised by the lack of legal base. 
Posebna težava je odsotnost pravne podlage.
This was made clear in the work undertaken to include services in VIES (B2B). 
To je postalo očitno pri delu, da se v VIES (B2B) vključijo storitve.