natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
indicates that data for this indicator could be collected by the evaluators in different ways; for example, through EU and national statistics surveys. 
Toda v navodilih Komisije je navedeno, da bi podatke za ta kazalnik izvajalci vrednotenja lahko zbirali na različne načine, na primer s statističnimi anketami EU in nacionalnimi statističnimi anketami.
Thus, the comparability of data at EU level depends upon the choices made by evaluators. 
Tako je primerljivost podatkov na ravni EU odvisna od izbire izvajalcev vrednotenja.
Although the Commission issued detailed guidelines to support the preparation of the reporting and evaluation, the interconnections of the CMES indicators and focus areas could provide an additional burden for the evaluators, have an impact on the quality of the programme evaluations and their comparability, and may result in delays, as in the past. 
Čeprav je Komisija izdala podrobne smernice za pomoč pri pripravi poročanja in vrednotenja, bi lahko medsebojne povezave med kazalniki CMES in prednostnimi področji pomenile dodatno obremenitev za izvajalce vrednotenja, vplivale na kakovost vrednotenja programov in njihovo primerljivost ter morda povzročile zamude, kot v preteklosti.
If reliable monitoring and evaluation information is not available at the key reporting time, Member States and the Commission may miss the opportunity to improve the implementation of renewable energy measures. 
Če zanesljive informacije o spremljanju in vrednotenju v ključnih trenutkih za poročanje niso na voljo, lahko države članice in Komisija zamudijo priložnost za izboljšanje izvajanja ukrepov za energijo iz obnovljivih virov.
Renewable energy projects confirm their potential for rural development, despite weaknesses in the selection procedures and project implementation 72. 
Projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov potrjujejo svoj potencial za razvoj podeželja, in to kljub slabostim v izbirnih postopkih in izvajanju projektov 72.
The Member States are responsible for selecting rural development projects, with the aim of better targeting rural development measures towards EU priorities and the Member States’ objectives and strategies. 
Države članice so odgovorne za izbiro projektov na področju razvoja podeželja s ciljem boljšega ciljnega usmerjanja ukrepov za razvoj podeželja v prioritete EU ter cilje in strategije držav članic.
In order to do so, Member States are required to establish and apply clear, relevant and objective eligibility and selection criteria together with objective, fair and transparent procedures59. 
Zato morajo države članice določiti in uporabljati jasna, relevantna in objektivna
Eligibility criteria are the requirements which have to be fulfilled by the projects in order to be eligible for support under the EAFRD. 
Merila za upravičenost so zahteve, ki jih morajo projekti izpolnjevati, da so upravičeni do podpore v okviru EKSRP.
Selection criteria are established by the Member States for the prioritisation of projects that best meet the needs identified and the objectives established in the RDPs. 
Države članice določijo izbirna merila za prednostno razvrščanje projektov, ki so najprimernejši za opredeljene potrebe in cilje, določene v programih razvoja podeželja.
Member States should apply the selection criteria even in cases where sufficient funds are available for all applications to be approved, in order to ensure sound financial management60. 
Države članice bi morale uporabljati izbirna merila tudi v primerih, ko je na voljo dovolj sredstev za odobritev vseh vlog, da se zagotovi dobro finančno poslovodenje60.
48 59 60 present case they should particularly ensure the selection of viable projects that support renewable energy deployment and add value to rural areas. 
V tem primeru bi morale zlasti zagotoviti izbor rentabilnih projektov, ki podpirajo uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov in dodajo vrednost podeželskim območjem.
Most projects had provided benefits for renewable energy deployment and rural development 74. 
Večina projektov je prinesla koristi za uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov in razvoj podeželja 74.
We audited renewable energy projects of different types and sizes (see Annex II). 
Sodišče je revidiralo projekte različnih vrst in velikosti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov (glej Prilogo II).
The project sample included both investments that had supplied third parties with energy from renewable sources and others that had generated the energy for the project owners’ own use. 
Vzorec projektov je vključeval naložbe za oskrbo tretjih oseb z energijo iz obnovljivih virov in naložbe za proizvodnjo energije za lastno porabo nosilcev projektov.
The aim of “third-party energy supply” projects was mainly to diversify the income of agricultural or forestry holdings. 
Glavni cilj projektov za „oskrbo tretjih oseb z energijo” je bila diverzifikacija dohodkov kmetijskih in gozdarskih gospodarstev.
Some projects had been initiated and implemented by SMEs or micro-enterprises. 
Nekatere projekte so predlagala in izvajala MSP ali mikropodjetja.
Successful projects of this type had provided new and well-received energy services to private households and public buildings in rural areas. 
Tovrstni uspešni projekti so zagotovili nove in dobro sprejete energetske storitve za zasebna gospodinjstva in javne stavbe na podeželskih območjih.
These projects had had environmental benefits, particularly in the case of district-heating systems, which are generally more energy-efficient and have lower emissions than individual heating systems. 
Ti projekti so imeli okoljske koristi, zlasti v primeru sistemov daljinskega ogrevanja, ki so običajno energijsko učinkovitejši in imajo manjše emisije kot posamezni sistemi ogrevanja.
These projects had also allowed project owners to benefit from new business opportunities. 
Ti projekti so nosilcem projektov omogočali tudi izkoriščanje novih poslovnih priložnosti.
They had allowed suppliers of raw material along the local biomass supply chain, mainly farmers and foresters, to diversify their incomes and maintain their holdings (see Box 8). 
Dobaviteljem surovin vzdolž verige za lokalno oskrbo z biomaso, večinoma kmetom in gozdarjem, so omogočili diverzifikacijo dohodkov in ohranitev njihovih gospodarstev (glej okvir 8).
Renewable energy deployment also requires thorough planning as well as installation and maintenance work. 
Uporaba energije iz obnovljivih virov zahteva temeljito načrtovanje ter montažna in vzdrževalna dela.
The expertise and experience gained in the region are valuable assets for its further development towards renewable energy production and usage, and the benefits may go beyond the initial project investment. 
Strokovno znanje in izkušnje, pridobljeni v regiji, so dragocen vir za dodaten razvoj regije v smeri proizvodnje in uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, koristi pa lahko presegajo začetno naložbo projekta.
Box 8 – Good practices in third-party energy supply projects financed under the EAFRD District heating systems in rural Austria Austria’s EAFRD support for renewable energy in the 2007-2013 programming period focused on the further development of wood-based district heating systems. 
Okvir 8 – Dobre prakse pri projektih za oskrbo tretjih oseb z energijo, ki se financirajo iz EKSRP Sistemi daljinskega ogrevanja na podeželskih območjih Avstrije V Avstriji je bila podpora iz EKSRP za energijo iz obnovljivih virov v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 osredotočena na dodaten razvoj sistemov daljinskega ogrevanja na osnovi lesa.
One of the projects we visited concerned EAFRD support for diversification into non-agricultural activities. 
Eden od projektov, ki jih je obiskalo Sodišče, se je nanašal na podporo iz EKSRP za diverzifikacijo v nekmetijske dejavnosti.
It was run by a cooperative of 26 part-time farmers who jointly owned and managed a forest measuring 400 ha. 
Izvajala ga je zadruga 26 kmetov, ki dejavnost opravljajo s krajšim delovnim časom ter ki so bili skupaj lastniki in upravitelji gozda velikosti 400 ha.
They had established a local heating system with a wood chip boiler with a 49 capacity of 398 kW. 
Vzpostavili so sistem lokalnega ogrevanja s kotlom na lesne sekance in zmogljivostjo 398 kW.
The system provided 580 MWh of heat per year to three buildings outside the village: a nursery home, a building for assisted living, and a monastery. 
Sistem je zagotavljal 580 MWh toplote na leto za tri stavbe zunaj vasi: negovalno ustanovo, stavbo z oskrbovanimi stanovanji in samostan.
The farmers ran the heating system, as well as providing the wood for the production of wood chips from their own forests, using mainly low-quality wood from thinnings for which they had had no market before. 
Kmetje so upravljali sistem ogrevanja in zagotavljali les za proizvodnjo lesnih sekancev iz lastnih gozdov, pri čemer so uporabljali večinoma les slabše kakovosti, pridobljen z redčenjem gozdov, za katerega prej niso imeli trga.
The farmers had benefited from the project economically: they had gained income streams from the heat itself and from the wood chips. 
Od projekta so imeli gospodarske koristi: pridobili so vire dohodka iz same toplote in lesnih sekancev.
In addition, the farmers had obtained new skills by participating in courses for entities managing district heating systems. 
Poleg tega so pridobili nova znanja z udeležbo na tečajih za subjekte, ki upravljajo sisteme daljinskega ogrevanja.
Other district-heating systems with wood chip boilers which we visited were run by SMEs or micro-enterprises and had higher energy capacities, thus providing heat to a greater number of consumers, including private houses, local authorities and restaurants. 
Druge sisteme daljinskega ogrevanja s kotli na lesne sekance, ki jih je Sodišče obiskalo, so upravljala MSP ali mikropodjetja, njihove zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo energije pa so bile večje, zato so zagotavljali toploto več potrošnikom, tudi zasebnim hišam, lokalnim organom in restavracijam.
In all cases, the wood or the chips were being supplied by local farmers or forest holders located within a 50 km radius. 
V vseh primerih so les ali lesne sekance dobavljali lokalni kmetje ali lastniki gozdov znotraj 50-kilometrskega območja.
77. ‘Own-use projects’ had provided benefits to agricultural or forestry holdings and food-processing enterprises, for example through energy security and self-sufficiency, reduced energy costs, improved financial performance or a reduced carbon footprint. 
77. „Projekti za lastno porabo” so zagotovili koristi za kmetijska in gozdarska gospodarstva ter živilsko-predelovalna podjetja, na primer z zanesljivostjo preskrbe z energijo in samozadostnostjo, nižjimi stroški energije, izboljšano finančno smotrnostjo ali manjšim ogljičnim odtisom.
They had also contributed indirectly to sustainable rural development by providing jobs and income opportunities to local residents or by contributing to improving the environmental situation in the region (see Box 9). 
Posredno so prispevali tudi k trajnostnemu razvoju podeželja z zagotavljanjem delovnih mest in možnosti dohodka za lokalne prebivalce ali s prispevanjem k izboljšanju okoljskega stanja v regiji (glej okvir 9).
50 Box 9 – ‘Own-use’ renewable energy projects contribute indirectly to rural development Reducing the carbon footprint of a winery in Tuscany A multifaceted project which we visited had received EAFRD support for food processing; it concerned the building of a new winery. 
Okvir 9 – Projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov za lastno porabo posredno prispevajo k razvoju podeželja Zmanjšanje ogljičnega odtisa vinske kleti v Toskani Večstranski projekt, ki ga je obiskalo Sodišče, je prejel podporo iz EKSRP za predelavo živil; nanašal se je na izgradnjo nove vinske kleti.
Environmental sustainability was a priority for the winery, which calculated the carbon footprint of its products. 
Okoljska trajnost je bila prioriteta za vinsko klet, ki je izračunala ogljični odtis svojih proizvodov.
The project included various elements for reducing energy consumption and producing renewable energy: a geothermal plant for cooling, a photovoltaic installation, a wood biomass heating plant, and several investments for saving energy (a sunlight capture system, ventilation, evaporative cooling tower). 
Projekt je vključeval različne elemente za zmanjšanje porabe energije in proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov: obrat za proizvodnjo geotermalne energije za hlajenje, fotonapetostno napravo, toplarno na lesno biomaso in več naložb v varčevanje z energijo (sistem za zajemanje sončne svetlobe, ventilacijski sistem, stolp za hlajenje z izhlapevanjem).
In 2015, the company produced 68 % of the energy it used. 
Leta 2015 je podjetje proizvedlo 68 % energije, ki jo je porabilo.
The project also resulted in a reduction of the carbon footprint per bottle of wine. 
Rezultat projekta je bilo tudi zmanjšanje ogljičnega odtisa na steklenico vina.
In addition to improving its environmental performance, the company had improved its economic results, which had also allowed it to increase its number of employees (from 8 in January 2011 to 20 in December 2016). 
Poleg povečanja okoljske smotrnosti so se izboljšali tudi gospodarski rezultati podjetja, kar je omogočilo tudi povečanje števila zaposlenih (z 8 januarja 2011 na 20 decembra 2016).
51 Small renewable energy projects in Bulgaria adapted to the farmers’ needs Two investment projects on small farms we visited in Bulgaria (12.5 ha and 4 ha) underline the potential of EAFRD-financed renewable energy projects, albeit to a more modest extent. 
Manjši projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov v Bolgariji, ki so bili prilagojeni potrebam kmetov Naložbena projekta na majhnih kmetijah, ki ju je Sodišče obiskalo v Bolgariji (12,5 ha in 4 ha), poudarjata potencial projektov na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov, financiranih iz EKSRP, čeprav v manjšem obsegu.
Both projects used electricity from photovoltaic cells to run an irrigation pump for organic hazelnut and truffle production, and for electric lighting in a warehouse for organic fruit. 
Pri obeh projektih se je električna energija iz fotonapetostnih celic uporabljala za poganjanje namakalne črpalke za ekološko pridelavo lešnikov in gomoljik ter za električno razsvetljavo v skladišču za ekološko pridelano sadje.
Both projects were implemented outside the village without connection to the grid, so the photovoltaic installations were considered to be economical and environmentally friendly solutions, adapted to the farmers’ needs. 
Oba projekta sta se izvajala na območju zunaj vasi, ki ni priključeno na omrežje, zato so fotonapetostne naprave štele za gospodarno in okolju prijazno rešitev, prilagojene potrebam kmetov.
The production of organic hazelnuts and truffles provides opportunities not only for farmers but also for the region to develop new business opportunities. 
Ekološka pridelava lešnikov in gomoljik ponuja priložnosti ne le za kmete, ampak tudi za regijo, da ustvari nove poslovne priložnosti.
However, the Member States’ selection procedures did not ensure that the most pertinent projects were selected ... 
Države članice s svojimi izbirnimi postopki niso zagotovile, da so bili izbrani najprimernejši projekti, ...
The Member States are required to establish selection criteria for the selection of projects, in order to ensure that financial resources for rural development are used in the best way. 
Države članice morajo določiti izbirna merila za projekte, da zagotovijo, da se finančna sredstva za razvoj podeželja porabijo na najboljši način.
We found that the Member States visited did not always comply with this principle. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da obiskane države članice niso vedno upoštevale tega načela.
We examined the selection criteria and processes in the 2014-2020 programming period and found that four of the five Member States61 we visited had used selection criteria that were relevant, to some extent, to ensure that projects that facilitated renewable energy deployment and sustainable rural development were prioritised: for example, projects which were expected to have positive effects on income diversification and the environment, the use of locally produced and processed raw material (biomass fuels), or the consideration of local strategies and the involvement of the local population. 
Sodišče je preučilo izbirna merila in procese v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 ter ugotovilo, da so štiri od petih obiskanih držav članic61 uporabljale izbirna merila, ki so bila do neke mere ustrezna za zagotavljanje, da imajo projekti, ki omogočajo uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov in trajnostni razvoj podeželja, prednost: na primer projekti, za katere se pričakuje, da bodo imeli pozitivne učinke na diverzifikacijo dohodkov in okolje, uporabo lokalno pridelanih in predelanih surovin (goriva iz biomase) ali upoštevanje lokalnih strategij in vključenost lokalnega prebivalstva.
However, these efforts were partially jeopardised by weak selection procedures. 
Vendar so ta prizadevanja delno ovirali slabi izbirni postopki.
We considered that Austria, Bulgaria, Italy (Tuscany) and France (Basse-Normandie; concerning their forestry measures) had used undemanding scoring systems with minimum thresholds that could be achieved by fulfilling only one or a few criteria. 61 All Member States visited, with the exception of Bulgaria, had used relevant criteria. 
Sodišče meni, da so Avstrija, Bolgarija, Italija (Toskana) in Francija (Spodnja Normandija – samo za ukrepe na področju gozdarstva) uporabljale nezahtevne sisteme točkovanja z minimalnimi pragovi, ki jih je bilo mogoče doseči z izpolnjevanjem samo enega ali nekaterih meril. ... zaradi česar so nekateri projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov zagotavljali le obrobne koristi za podeželska območja 80.
Weaknesses in the selection process may result in the financing of projects that provide an economic benefit for the project owners, but have little impact on rural areas. 
Slabosti izbirnega procesa lahko privedejo do financiranja projektov, ki zagotavljajo gospodarsko korist za nosilce projektov, vendar imajo majhen vpliv na podeželska področja.
This is the case for some of the projects visited during the audit. 
To velja za nekatere projekte, obiskane med revizijo.
Financial support had not always been used to create jobs or initiate further business opportunities, to improve the situation of existing farm or forestry holdings or to provide energy services to the rural people (see Box 10). 
Finančna podpora se ni vedno uporabljala za ustvarjanje delovnih mest ali spodbujanje dodatnih poslovnih priložnosti, za izboljšanje stanja obstoječih kmetijskih ali gozdarskih gospodarstev ali za zagotavljanje energetskih storitev podeželskemu prebivalstvu (glej okvir 10).
52 Box 10 – Renewable energy projects with marginal benefits for rural development Marginal benefit for rural areas from photovoltaic projects in Bulgaria As set out in Box 2, Bulgaria had used more than 90 % of its EAFRD support for renewable energy in the 2007-2013 programming period for photovoltaic projects, despite recommendations to the contrary and despite grid capacity limitations62. Three renewable energy projects we visited in Bulgaria had received EAFRD support for the creation and development of micro-enterprises and for diversification into non-agricultural activities. 
Okvir 10 – Projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov z obrobnimi koristmi za razvoj podeželja Obrobne koristi fotonapetostnih projektov v Bolgariji za podeželska območja Kot je navedeno v okviru 2, je Bolgarija več kot 90 % svoje podpore iz EKRSP za energijo iz obnovljivih virov v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 porabila za fotonapetostne projekte, kljub temu, da ji je bilo priporočeno, naj tega ne stori, in kljub omejitvam zmogljivosti omrežja.62 V Bolgariji so trije obiskani projekti na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov prejeli podporo iz EKSRP za ustanovitev in razvoj mikropodjetij in diverzifikacijo v nekmetijske dejavnosti.
Each of the projects created one job for maintaining and protecting the installations. 
Vsak od projektov je ustvaril eno delovno mesto za vzdrževanje in varovanje objektov.
All three projects depended on preferential FIT payments, and did not provide other business opportunities or services, thus creating no considerable benefit for rural development. 
Vsi trije projekti so bili odvisni od preferencialnih plačil zagotovljenih odkupnih cen in niso zagotavljali drugih poslovnih priložnosti ali storitev, zaradi česar niso ustvarili večjih koristi za razvoj podeželja.
Our project visits confirmed the positive impact of certain types of renewable energy projects on rural development, justifying financial support under the EAFRD. 
Obiski projektov so potrdili pozitiven vpliv nekaterih vrst projektov na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov na razvoj podeželja, s čimer so upravičili finančno podporo v okviru EKSRP.
However, taking into account the existence of several other renewable energy support schemes, projects which do not contribute to both the renewable energy target and the overall rural development objective should not receive EAFRD support. 
Toda ker obstaja tudi več drugih programov podpore za energijo iz obnovljivih virov, projekti, ki ne prispevajo k cilju v zvezi z energijo iz obnovljivih virov in splošnemu cilju v zvezi z razvojem podeželja, ne bi smeli prejemati podpore iz EKSRP.
EU legislative and policy documents underline the intention to exploit the potentially positive impact of renewable energy investment on rural development. 
V zakonodajnih dokumentih EU in dokumentih EU o politikah je poudarjena namera za izkoriščanje potencialnega pozitivnega vpliva naložb v energijo iz obnovljivih virov na razvoj podeželja.
Studies confirm that renewable energy can have positive effects on sustainable rural development, but there are also environmental and socio-economic risks linked to the deployment of certain types of renewable energy. 
Študije potrjujejo, da ima lahko energija iz obnovljivih virov pozitivne učinke na trajnostni razvoj podeželja, vendar obstajajo tudi okoljska in socialno-ekonomska tveganja, povezana z uporabo nekaterih vrst energije iz obnovljivih virov.
In our audit, we examined the framework for renewable energy with a focus on how it had integrated rural development aspects. 
V reviziji Sodišča je bil preučen okvir za energijo iz obnovljivih virov s poudarkom na načinu vključevanja vidikov razvoja podeželja.
We also examined the rural development policy framework and its implementation in the Member States in order to assess whether EAFRD support for renewable energy had actually contributed to sustainable rural development. 
podeželja in njegovo izvajanje v državah članicah, da bi ocenilo, ali je podpora iz EKSRP za energijo iz obnovljivih virov dejansko prispevala k trajnostnemu razvoju podeželja.
From our audit work we conclude that funding of renewable energy projects has significant potential to facilitate sustainable rural development but, as yet, that potential remains mostly unrealised. 
Na podlagi revizijskega dela Sodišča je mogoče priti do zaključka, da ima financiranje projektov na področju energije iz obnovljivih virov znaten potencial za omogočanje trajnostnega razvoja podeželja, vendar za zdaj ta potencial ostaja večinoma neizkoriščen.
We found that the rural development dimension of renewable energy had not been adequately considered in the Commission and the Member States’ current policy framework. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da razsežnost uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, ki se nanaša na razvoj podeželja, ni bila ustrezno upoštevana v sedanjem okviru politike Komisije in držav članic.
As a consequence, the opportunities of renewable energy deployment in rural areas had not been sufficiently exploited. 
Zato priložnosti uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov na podeželskih območjih niso bile dovolj izkoriščene.
The Commission has recently proposed some changes to the renewable energy policy framework that have the potential to improve this situation (paragraphs 24 to 31). 
Komisija je nedavno predlagala nekatere spremembe okvira politike za energijo iz obnovljivih virov, s katerimi bi se lahko to stanje izboljšalo (odstavki 24 do 31).