natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under these schemes, beneficiaries will receive the lump sum if there is sufficient assurance that they have executed the activities as described in the project plan. 
V skladu s tema shemama upravičenci prejmejo pavšalni znesek, če obstaja zadostno zagotovilo, da so izvedli dejavnosti, kot so bile opisane v načrtu projekta.
On the basis of our annual Statement of Assurance audit work, we have analysed the setup of the scheme for lump-sum project funding in the area of research and consider that the scheme: - could serve as a suitable funding model whose relative simplicity could encourage participation in particular of young researchers, SMEs and new entrants, in Horizon 2020. - but could be more difficult to implement because it requires a change of mentality in the research community which, for decades, was used to working with cost- reimbursement schemes. 
Sodišče je na podlagi revizijskega dela, ki ga opravi za izdajo letne izjave o zanesljivosti, analiziralo strukturo sheme za financiranje projektov s pavšalnimi zneski na področju raziskav in meni: - da bi se shema lahko uporabljala kot primeren model financiranja, katerega relativna enostavnost bi spodbujala sodelovanje, zlasti sodelovanje mladih raziskovalcev, malih in srednjih podjetij ter novih udeležencev, v programu Obzorje 2020, - vendar bi jo bilo morda teže uporabljati, ker bi bila potrebna sprememba mišljenja med raziskovalci, ki so bili desetletja navajeni uporabljati sheme povračila stroškov.
Furthermore, it calls for a change in the Commission’s approach to project selection, assessment, monitoring and evaluation. 
Poleg tega se zanjo zahteva sprememba v pristopu Komisije k izbiri, oceni, spremljanju in vrednotenju projektov.
The Commission is considering further enhancing the use of simplified cost options such as lump-sum project funding. 
Komisija razmišlja, da bi povečala uporabo poenostavljenega obračunavanja stroškov, kot je financiranje projektov s pavšalnimi zneski.
This has so far been difficult due to the lack of appropriate performance information and criteria, as the results and the impact of research are by their nature difficult to predict and evaluate. 
Doslej je bilo to težko zaradi pomanjkanja ustreznih informacij o smotrnosti in meril zanjo, saj je rezultate in učinek raziskav zaradi njihove narave težko napovedovati in vrednotiti.
They often do not follow a linear path51, and can occur long time after the moment of funding52. 
pokažejo šele dolgo časa po financiranju52.
Nevertheless, the use of performance information and criteria is important to ensure EU added value in funded research projects, and to achieve policy objectives such as “excellence”, dissemination of results, and cooperation with industry. 
Vendar je uporaba informacij o smotrnosti in meril zanjo pomembna za zagotovitev dodane vrednosti financiranih raziskovalnih projektov ter doseganje ciljev politike, kot so odličnost, razširjanje rezultatov in sodelovanje z gospodarstvom.
Acceptance of beneficiaries’ accounting practices53 27. 
Sprejemanje računovodskih praks upravičencev53 27.
Beneficiaries can have their own accounting systems and practices that are set up in accordance with national legislations and International Accounting Stardards (IAS). 
Upravičenci imajo svoje računovodske sisteme in prakse, ki so pripravljeni skladno z nacionalno zakonodajo in mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
Such legislations and standards may leave a certain margin of discretion for the beneficiaries’cost-accounting methods. 
Ta zakonodaja in standardi morda dopuščajo delno prosto presojo pri metodah stroškovnega računovodstva upravičencev.
As a consequence, there is a risk that the beneficiaries’ methods for calculating and classifying cost items may not satisfy cost-eligibility criteria set by the EU Financial Regulation (FR) and the rules for participation in the research and innovation programme, even though these methods are recognised by, e.g, national funders. 
Zato obstaja tveganje, da metode upravičencev za izračun in klasifikacijo stroškovnih postavk ne izpolnjujejo meril za stroškovno upravičenost iz finančne uredbe EU in pravil za sodelovanje v programih za raziskave in inovacije, čeprav te metode priznavajo na primer nacionalni financerji.
This has the effect that some participants have to invest in specific accounting tools when justifying certain cost items for Horizon 2020 funding, whereas they do not have to do so for other national funds . 
Posledica tega je, da morajo nekateri udeleženci zaradi upravičevanja posameznih stroškovnih postavk v okviru financiranja iz programa Obzorje 2020 vložiti sredstva v posebna računovodska orodja, kar pri drugih nacionalnih sredstvih ni potrebno.
ECA, 2015 annual report, paragraph 3.31. European Parliament, Conference of Committe Chairs, letter 21.3.2017 on the 2018 ECA Workprogramme, p. 
Evropski parlament, konferenca predsednikov odborov, dopis z dne 21.3.2017 o programu dela Evropskega računskega sodišča za leto 2018, str.
ITRE proposed to assess “the use of national accounting systems [..] for simplification purposes”. 
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko je predlagal, naj se zaradi poenostavitve oceni uporaba nacionalnih računovodskih sistemov.
51 52 53 18 
18 52 53 54
This is an obstacle for the Commission to cross-reliance on national audits. 
To je ovira za navzkrižno zanašanje Komisije na nacionalne revizije.
Evolution of the error rate 29. 
Spremembe stopnje napake 29.
We identified a decrease of the error rates in our 2016 annual report Chapter “Competitiveness for growth and jobs” (from 5,6 % in 2014 to 4,4 % in 2015 and 4,1 % in 2016) (figure 4). 
Sodišče je v poglavju o konkurenčnosti za rast in delovna mesta svojega letnega poročila za leto 2016 navedlo, da so se stopnje napake zmanjšale, in sicer s 5,6 % v letu 2014 na 4,4 % v letu 2015 in 4,1 % v letu 2016 (slika 4).
However, this decrease only gives limited information on the transition from FP7 to Horizon 2020, as: - research and innovation spending only accounts for 59 % of all spending under the Chapter of “Competitiveness for growth and jobs”55; - of the 92 transactions that we have audited in the area of research and innovation in 2016, 79 were from FP7 and only 13 from Horizon 2020; in 2015, only one Horizon 2020 transaction was selected in our sample. - while we present our results on regularity on an annual basis, research programmes can take several years to complete; beneficiaries and the Commission can make adjustments throughout the entire period and at the final payment; - the error rate is based on those errors that we have been able to quantify. 
Vendar to zmanjšanje daje le delne informacije o prehodu od 7. okvirnega programa na program Obzorje 2020, ker: - poraba za raziskave in inovacije predstavlja le 59 % vse porabe v okviru poglavja o konkurenčnosti za rast in delovna mesta;55 - je 79 transakcij s področja raziskav in inovacij od 92, ki jih je Sodišče revidiralo leta 2016, spadalo pod 7. okvirni program in samo 13 pod program Obzorje 2020, leta 2015 pa je bila v vzorec Sodišča zajeta le ena transakcija iz programa Obzorje 2020; - Sodišče predstavlja svoje rezultate v zvezi s pravilnostjo za posamezna leta, za zaključek raziskovalnih programov pa je lahko potrebnih več let.
There may be other observations, such as system weaknesses or failure to meet documenation requirements, which do not directly affect the regularity of the transactions we examined. 
Upravičenci in Komisija lahko izvajajo prilagoditve v celotnem obdobju in pri končnem plačilu; - stopnja napake temelji na napakah, ki jih je mogoče količinsko opredeliti, obstajajo pa lahko tudi opažanja o drugih zadevah, kot so slabosti sistemov ali neizpolnjevanje zahtev glede dokumentacije, kar ne vpliva neposredno na transakcije, ki jih je preučilo Sodišče.
These observations are taken into account in our statement of assurance (SoA) opinion but are by their nature not included in the error rate calculation. 
Ta opažanja se upoštevajo pri mnenju v izjavi o zanesljivosti, vendar zaradi svoje narave niso vključena v izračun stopnje napake.
19 54 55 ECA, 2016 annual report, box 5.1. 
19 55 Evropsko računsko sodišče, Letno poročilo za leto 2016, okvir 5.1.
Figure 4 – Estimated level of error(%) “Competitiveness for growth and jobs” (2014 – 2016) Source: ECA. 30. 
Slika 4 – Ocenjena stopnja napake (v %) za področje konkurenčnosti za rast in delovna mesta Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče 30.
We found that most errors under FP7 stemmed from incorrect application of the eligibility rules, making simplification a possible instrument in reducing errors56. Although our information on the implementation of Horizon 2020 is limited57, as we have tested a small number of transactions, there are indications that the risk of irregularities in beneficiaries’ cost claims, in particular in relation to staff costs, remain present. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je bila večina napak v 7. okvirnem programu posledica nepravilne uporabe pravil o upravičenosti, zato bi lahko bila poenostavitev koristna za zmanjšanje napak.56 Čeprav ima Sodišče malo informacij o izvajanju programa Obzorje 2020,57 saj je preizkusilo le majhno število transakcij, pa te kažejo, da še vedno obstaja tveganje, da bo prišlo do nepravilnosti v zahtevkih upravičencev za povračilo stroškov, zlasti v zvezi s stroški dela.
In 2016, four out of thirteen Horizon 2020 transactions audited were affected by errors. 
Leta 2016 so bile v štirih od 13 transakcij iz programa Obzorje 2020, ki so bile revidirane, najdene napake.
Three were related to incorrectly declared staff costs, despite the introduction of simplified cost options and less stringent requirements concerning timesheets (table 3). 
Tri so bile kljub uvedbi poenostavljenega obračunavanja stroškov in manj strogim zahtevam v zvezi z evidenco opravljenih ur povezane z nepravilno prijavljenimi stroški (tabela 3).
For concrete examples see annex 5.2: overview of errors with an impact of at least 20 % for “Competitiveness for growth and jobs” (ECA, 2016 annual report). 
Za konkretne primere glej pregled napak z učinkom vsaj 20 % za področje konkurenčnosti za rast in delovna mesta v Letnem poročilu Evropskega računskega sodišča za leto 2016, Priloga 5.2.
We expect that more than half of our research sample for our 2018 annual report will relate to Horizon 2020 transactions. 
Sodišče pričakuje, da bo več kot polovica transakcij v vzorcu transakcij s področja raziskav za leto 2018 zajetih iz programa Obzorje 2020.
20 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Materiality 2014 2015 2016 Upper error limit Estimated level of error Lower error limit 56 57 
20 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Pomembnost 2014 2015 2016 Zgornja meja napake Ocenjena stopnja napake Spodnja meja napake 56 57
The application rate measures the number of applications submitted per Member State or per type of beneficiary group. 
Stopnja vloženih predlogov meri število predlogov, ki jih vložijo posamezne države članice ali posamezne skupine upravičencev.
The successs rate measures the number of funded applications in relation to the total number of submitted applications per Member State or per type of beneficiary group. 
Stopnja uspešnosti meri število predlogov, za katere se odobri financiranje, glede na skupno število predlogov, ki jih vložijo posamezne države članice ali posamezne skupine upravičencev.
The participation rate measures the actual funding received per Member State or per type of beneficiary group. 
Stopnja udeležbe meri financiranje, ki ga prejmejo posamezne države članice ali vrste upravičencev.
Excellence is the overriding principle in Horizon 2020 and means that on the basis of competitive calls, only the best projects are selected. 
V skladu s tem načelom se na podlagi konkurenčnega razpisa za zbiranje predlogov izberejo najboljši projekti.
Geographical discrepancies 32. 
Geografske razlike 32.
With regard to the application rate, data from the Commission shows that the EU-15 Member States, except Luxembourg, had a higher number of Horizon 2020 applications during the first three years of the programme (2014-2016) than EU-13 Member States59. 
Podatki Komisije v zvezi s stopnjo vloženih predlogov kažejo, da so države članice EU-15, razen Luksemburga, v prvih treh letih programa Obzorje 2020 (2014–2016) vložile več 58 Evropsko računsko sodišče, Letno poročilo za leto 2016, odstavek 5.5.
However, for some EU-13 Member States, the application rate was higher than EU-15 ECA, 2016 annual report, paragraph 5.5. European Commission. 
predlogov kot države članice EU-13.59 Vendar je bila stopnja vloženih predlogov za nekatere od držav članic EU-13 višja od tiste za države članice EU-15, če se število predlogov primerja s številom raziskovalcev zadevnih državah.60 33.
Horizon 2020 in full swing – Three years on – Key facts and figures 2014 - 2016, p. 
Najnižji sta stopnji za Luksemburg in Evropska komisija, Horizon 2020 in full swing – Three years on – Key facts and figures 2014 - 2016, str.
EU-13 refers to countries that have joined the EU since 2004, including Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. 
EU-13 zajema države, ki so se pridružile EU od leta 2014, in sicer Bolgarijo, Hrvaško, Ciper, Češko republiko, Estonijo, Madžarsko, Latvijo, Litvo, Malto, Poljsko, Romunijo, Slovaško in Slovenijo.
EU-15 refers to Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom. 
V EU-15 se uvrščajo Avstrija, Belgija, Danska, Finska, Francija, Nemčija, Grčija, Irska, Italija, Luksemburg, Nizozemska, Portugalska, Španija, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo.
Country group EU – 15 EU - 13 FP 6 25 % 20 % FP 7 22 % 18 % Horizon 2020 15 % 11,9 % 60 61 62 
22 Skupina držav EU-15 EU-13 6. okvirni program 25 % 20 % 7. okvirni program 22 % 18 % Obzorje 2020 15 % 11,9 % 59 60 61 62
around 4,9 % for EU-13 Member States altogether63. The remaining share of funding goes to non EU-28 countries 64. However, for some EU-13 Member States, the participation rate is higher than EU-15 Member States if the amount of funding is compared with the number of research personnel in that Member State65. 
Portugalsko (0,3 % oz. 1,6 %), skupna stopnja za države EU-13 pa znaša približno 4,9 %.63 Ostali delež financiranja dobijo države, ki niso članice EU-28.64 Vendar je bila stopnja sodelovanja za nekatere od držav članic EU-13 višja od tiste za države članice EU-15, če se višina sredstev primerja s številom raziskovalcev zadevnih državah.65 Vmesna ocena 7. okvirnega programa66 je pokazala, da financiranje po državi članici ni sorazmerno s številom prebivalcev ali BDP.
Discrepancies among beneficiary groups 35. 
Razlike med skupinami upravičencev 35.
For beneficiary groups, public bodies account for around 60 % of the total number of Horizon 2020 applications, whereas businesses submitted around 36 % of the total Horizon 2020 applications67. With regard to the success rate, businesses have a similar success rate in Horizon 2020 to that of educational establishments (13.5 %), which is lower than the average successs rate of all beneficiary groups (14.8 %)68. 
Če pogledamo skupine upravičencev, vidimo, da so javni organi vložili približno 60 % vseh predlogov v okviru programa Obzorje 2020, podjetja pa približno 36 %.67 Stopnja uspešnosti podjetij je bila podobna stopnji uspešnosti izobraževalnih zavodov (13,5 %) in je bila nižja od povprečne stopnje uspešnosti vseh skupin upravičencev (14,8 %).68 Vzeto v celoti so v prvih treh letih izvajanja programa podjetja prejela 27 % sredstev programa Obzorje 2020, javni organi pa približno 69 %.69 Ostali del sredstev so dobili drugi subjekti (ki niso javni organi niti podjetja).70 Povečevanje udeležbe in pečat odličnosti 36.
Widening actions and seal of excellence 36. A selected group of Member States (i.e. EU-13 Member States, Luxembourg and Portugal) and associated neighbouring countries are eligible for the widening actions of the European Commission. 
Izbrana skupina držav članic (tj. države članice EU-13, Luksemburg in Portugalska) in pridružene sosednje države so upravičene do sodelovanja v ukrepih Komisije za povečevanje Evropska komisija, Horizon 2020 in full swing – Three years on – Key facts and figures 2014 - 2016, str.
Interim evaluation of the Seventh Framework Programme, report of the Expert Group, final report 12 November 2010, section 5.3. 
Interim evaluation of the Seventh Framework Programme, poročilo strokovne skupine, končno poročilo, 12. november 2010, točka 5.3.
European Commission. Horizon 2020 in full swing – Three years on – Key facts and figures 2014 - 2016, p. 
Evropska komisija, Horizon 2020 in full swing – Three years on – Key facts and figures 2014 - 2016, str.
Idem, p. 
Prav tam, str.
Commission. These actions aim to address the causes of low participation of these Member States in Horizon 2020 by providing additional support for policy design, institution and capacity building, improving communication and networking, and facilitating the necessary structural reforms. 
Ti ukrepi so namenjeni odpravi vzrokov za majhno sodelovanje teh držav članic v programu Obzorje 2020. Z njimi se zagotavlja dodatna podpora za pripravo politik, razvoj zmogljivosti in krepitev institucij, izboljševanje komuniciranja in mreženje ter omogočanje potrebnih strukturnih reform.
So far, the widening actions are designed to cover mainly public bodies for research and education in the selected countries, whereas private firms, including SME’s and first-time entrants are not directly included in the scope of these actions. 
Zaenkrat so ukrepi za povečevanje udeležbe zasnovani tako, da zajemajo v glavnem javne organe na področju raziskav in izobraževanja v izbranih državah, zasebna podjetja, vključno z malimi in srednjimi podjetji ter novimi udeleženci, pa niso neposredno vključena v te ukrepe.
The seal of excellence is a high-quality label awarded to project proposals that meet the selection criteria but which are not awarded funding due to budgetary constraints. 
Pečat odličnosti je oznaka visoke kakovosti, ki se podeli predlogom projektov, ki izpolnjujejo izbirna merila, vendar se zaradi proračunskih omejitev ne financirajo.
An estimate of €66.3 billion in additional funding would have been required to fund all proposals considered as being “excellent”so far71. The SME Instrument under Horizon 2020 was selected as the first candidate to implement the seal of excellence initiative, which aims to facilite unfunded good proposals from SMEs to get access to funding from alternative sources, such as the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI-F) managed by national authorities. 
Za financiranje vseh predlogov, ki štejejo za odlične, bi bilo doslej po oceni potrebnih 66,3 milijarde EUR dodatnih sredstev.71 V okviru programa Obzorje 2020 je bil instrument za mala in srednja podjetja izbran kot prvi za izvajanje pobude za pečat odličnosti, katerega cilj je omogočiti, da bi dobri predlogi malih in srednjih podjetij, ki niso bili izbrani za financiranje, imeli dostop do financiranja iz alternativnih virov, kot so evropski strukturni in investicijski skladi, ki jih upravljajo nacionalni organi.
According to figures from the Commission, 8 781 seal of excellence certificates have been awarded to SME Instrument project proposals that could not be funded under Horizon 2020. 
Po podatkih Komisije je bilo za predloge projektov v okviru instrumenta za mala in srednja podjetja, ki jih ni bilo mogoče financirati iz sredstev programa Obzorje 2020, podeljenih 8 781 pečatov odličnosti.
A CONTRIBUTION TO SIMPLIFICATION FOR RESEARCH BEYOND HORIZON 2020 Where can we identify simplification? 
PRISPEVEK K POENOSTAVITVI NA PODROČJU RAZISKAV PO IZTEKU PROGRAMA OBZORJE 2020 Na katerih področjih lahko ugotovimo poenostavitve?
In comparison with earlier research programmes, practitioners consider Horizon 2020 to be the best EU programme for research and innovation so far72. Various actors recognise the European Commisison, Framework Programme Monitoring https://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index.cfm?pg=monitoring. 
Strokovnjaki iz prakse menijo, da je v primerjavi s prejšnjimi programi za raziskave program Obzorje 2020 najboljši program EU za raziskave in inovacije doslej.72 Različni akterji Evropska komisija, Framework Programme Monitoring https://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index.cfm?pg=monitoring.
Second conference on “Horizon 2020: performance and further simplification”, 28 February 2017 http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?pg=events&eventcode=21CCBCEC-AF19-3ABA-EA2990E929F25BAC. 
Druga konferenca z naslovom Horizon 2020: performance and further simplification, 28. februar 2017 http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?pg=events&eventcode=21CCBCEC-AF19-3ABA-EA2990E929F25BAC.
71 72 24 
24 71 72
25 considerable efforts towards simplification made by the Commission, and encourage further simplification73 74 75 76 77. 39. 
25 ugotavljajo, da je Komisija veliko storila za poenostavitev, in spodbujajo še dodatno poenostavljanje.73 74 75 76 77 39.
Our analysis has identified the following areas with visible efforts of simplification: - the improved accessibility of the basic legal regulations thanks to the creation of interfaces such as the Modal Grant Agreement (MGA), the work programme and the participants portal (paragraphs 12 to 16); - the creation of the Common Support Center (CSC) and its role in simplification that has led the Commission to give the CSC a steering role in the roll-out of a single electronic grant management system across the Commission78 (paragraphs 18 to 19); - the use of simplified cost options such as lump-sum project funding (paragraphs 24 to 26); - more flexibility in the reporting of costs, such as the partial acceptance of beneficiaries’ usual cost-accounting practices (paragraphs 27 to 28). 
V analizi Sodišča so opredeljena naslednja področja, na katerih je bila dosežena vidna poenostavitev: - boljša dostopnost temeljnih zakonskih predpisov zaradi vzpostavitve vmesnikov, kot so vzorčni sporazum o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev, program dela in portal za udeležence (odstavki 12 do 16); - vzpostavitev skupnega podpornega centra in njegova vloga v poenostavitvi, zaradi katere je Komisija prenesla na center usmerjanje uvedbe enotnega elektronskega sistema za upravljanje dodeljevanja nepovratnih sredstev za vso Komisijo (odstavka 18 in 19);78 - uporaba poenostavljenih načinov obračunavanja stroškov, kot je financiranje projektov s pavšalnimi zneski (odstavki 24 do 26); Evropska komisija, Razmislek o prihodnosti financ EU, COM(2017) 358 z dne 28. junija 2017, odstavek 4.2.3.
For example: EUA, From Vision to Action: What EUA proposes for the Next Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (FP9). 
Na primer: EUA, From Vision to Action: What EUA proposes for the Next Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (FP9).
And EC, Report on the Horizon 2020 simplification survey, p.28. 
Evropska komisija, Report on the Horizon 2020 simplification survey, str. 28.
EP, 2015 discharge resolution (43). 
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o razrešnici za leto 2015 (43).
P8_TA(2017/0143), 27 April 2017, p. 
P8_TA(2017/0143), 27. april 2017, str.
23, 24, 41 and 50, paragraphs 34, 43, 161 and 214. 
23, 24, 41 in 50, odstavki 34, 43, 161 in 214.
And EP, Comittee on Industry, Research and Energy, report on the assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation in view of its interim evaluation and the Framework Programme 9 proposal (2016/2147(INI)), p. 
Poročilo odbora Evropskega parlamenta za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko o oceni izvajanja programa Obzorje 2020 ob upoštevanju njegove vmesne ocene in predloga devetega okvirnega programa (2016/2147(INI)), str.
7, 19 and 30, paragraph 49 and suggestion D1. 
7, 19 in 30, odstavek 49 in pobuda D1.
And EP, EPRS Horizon 2020 EU framework programme for research and innovation, European Implementation Assessment, February 2017 (PE 598.599). 
Generalni direktorat Evropskega parlamenta za parlamentarne raziskovalne storitve, Horizon 2020 EU framework programme for research and innovation, European Implementation Assessment, februar 2017 (PE 598.599).
Draft Council conclusions 5940/18 ADD1 (p. 
Osnutek sklepov Sveta 5940/18 ADD1 (str.