natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, OLAF provides methodological guidance for departmental anti-fraud strategies and monitors their implementation by taking part in the central review of Management Plans and Annual Activity Reports. 
Poleg tega urad OLAF zagotavlja metodološke smernice za oddelčne strategije boja proti goljufijam ter spremlja njihovo izvajanje s sodelovanjem pri osrednjem pregledu načrtov upravljanja in letnih poročil o dejavnostih.
The 2014–2020 Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) has introduced for the first time a regulatory requirement obliging Member States to put in place effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures, based on a risk assessment. 
Z uredbo o skupnih določbah za obdobje 2014–2020 je bila prvič uvedena regulativna zahteva, da morajo države članice uvesti učinkovite in sorazmerne ukrepe za boj proti goljufijam, ki temeljijo na oceni tveganja.
The Commission launched a stock-taking study on the implementation of Article 125(4)(c) in all Member States in 2017. 
Komisija je leta 2017 začela informativno študijo o izvajanju člena 125(4)(c) v vseh državah članicah.
This study was finalised in 2018 and the findings demonstrate that overall Member States have put in place proportionate anti-fraud measures in relation to the risks identified. 
Ta študija je bila dokončana leta 2018, njene ugotovitve pa kažejo, da so države članice na splošno uvedle sorazmerne ukrepe za boj proti goljufijam v zvezi z opredeljenimi tveganji.
A thematic audit on the effectiveness and proportionality of anti-fraud measures has been launched by DG EMPL in 2018 (covering DG REGIO and DG EMPL programmes). The Commission is monitoring with the Member States’ programme authorities in cohesion policy each fraud case brought to its attention. 
GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje je leta2018 začel tematsko revizijo učinkovitosti in sorazmernosti ukrepov za boj proti goljufijam (ki obsega programe GDza regionalno in mestno politiko ter GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje). Komisija skupaj z organi držav članic, pristojnimi za programe na področju kohezijske politike, spremlja vsak primer goljufije, na katerega je opozorjena.
Regular exchanges of best practices take place in the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Fraud Prevention (COCOLAF) and are reported in the annual PIF Report. 
Redne izmenjave dobrih praks potekajo v Svetovalnem odboru za usklajevanje preprečevanja goljufij (COCOLAF), o njih pa se poroča v letnem poročilu o zaščiti finančnih interesov.
Important recurrent activities provided for in the 2011 CAFS (such as updating departmental anti-fraud strategies, fraud-proofing of funding instruments and anti-fraud training) continue still today and are accounted for in the services' Annual Activity Reports. 
Pomembne občasne dejavnosti, določene v strategiji Komisije za boj proti goljufijam iz leta 2011 (kot so posodobitev oddelčnih strategij za boj proti goljufijam, zagotovitev neprepustnosti instrumentov financiranja za goljufije in usposabljanje na področju boja proti goljufijam), se še vedno nadaljujejo in so predstavljene v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih.
Likewise, the principles guiding the Commission's fight against fraud as announced in the 2011 CAFS remain valid. 
Prav tako še naprej veljajo načela, ki Komisijo usmerjajo pri boju proti goljufijam in so določena v strategiji Komisije za boj proti goljufijam iz leta 2011.
The Commission confirms that the objectives in its anti-fraud strategy are largely of a general nature; however, the objectives are implemented through very specific actions which are accompanied by output indicators. 
Komisija potrjuje, da so cilji v njeni strategiji za boj proti goljufijam večinoma splošni; vendar se ti cilji izvajajo z zelo specifičnimi ukrepi, ki jih spremljajo kazalniki izložkov.
Where possible and adequate the Commission has defined quantitative targets (e.g. participation in anti-fraud trainings or fraud awareness level in the Directorates-General), which are embedded in the anti-fraud strategies (AFS) and in the relevant strategic planning and programming documents (Management Plans/Annual Activity Reports). 
Kjer je bilo mogoče in ustrezno, je Komisija opredelila kvantitativne cilje (npr. udeležba v usposabljanjih na področju boja proti goljufijam ali na ravni ozaveščanja o goljufijah v generalnih direktoratih), vključenih v strategije za boj proti goljufijam ter ustrezne dokumente strateškega načrtovanja in programske dokumente (načrti upravljanja/letna poročila o dejavnostih).
That said, the Commission agrees with the ECA on the desirability of increasing the result-orientation and measurability of its anti-fraud action. 
Ne glede na to se Komisija strinja z Evropskim računskim sodiščem, da bi bilo zaželeno povečati usmerjenost v rezultate in merljivost njenih ukrepov za boj proti goljufijam.
Further improvements in this respect will have to build on an enhanced analysis function as recommended by the ECA, which can, however, only gradually be implemented. 12 
Nadaljnje izboljšave v zvezi s tem bodo morale temeljiti na izboljšani funkciji analize, kot jo predlaga Evropsko računsko sodišče, ki pa se lahko izvaja samo postopoma.
The annual PIF Report presents the outputs of the Commission's and Member States' anti-fraud actions but also assesses, albeit at a limited level, the effectiveness of some of these actions, especially the anti-fraud measures taken by the Member States. 
V letnem poročilu o zaščiti finančnih interesov so predstavljeni izložki ukrepov Komisije in držav članic za boj proti goljufijam, na sicer omejeni ravni pa je ocenjena tudi učinkovitost nekaterih teh ukrepov, zlasti ukrepov za boj proti goljufijam, ki so jih sprejele države članice.
Although the PIF Report does not provide an absolute assessment of the effectiveness of all horizontal anti-fraud actions adopted by the EU and its Member States, it does achieve its mission according to Article 325(5) TFEU with its comprehensive overview on anti-fraud actions taken. 
Čeprav poročilo o zaščiti finančnih interesov ne zagotavlja popolne ocene učinkovitosti vseh horizontalnih ukrepov za boj proti goljufijam, ki so jih sprejele EU in njene države članice, pa izpolnjuje svojo nalogo v skladu s členom 325(5) PDEU, saj daje celovit pregled nad sprejetimi ukrepi za boj proti goljufijam.
As concerns the assessment of the total effectiveness of these actions, more targeted, in-depth and resource-intensive studies would be required. 
Kar zadeva oceno skupne učinkovitosti teh ukrepov, bi bile potrebne bolj ciljno usmerjene poglobljene študije, ki zahtevajo več sredstev.
The Annual Management and Performance Report (AMPR) for the EU budget is a report built on the information made available by the Authorising Officers by Delegation in their Annual Activity Reports. 
Letno poročilo o upravljanju in smotrnosti izvrševanja proračuna EU je poročilo, ki temelji na informacijah, ki so jih odredbodajalci na podlagi prenosa pooblastil zagotovili v svojih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih.
As far as anti-fraud action is concerned, it includes a section with information on anti-fraud strategies and, as of 2017, a section on the protection of the EU budget. 
Kar zadeva ukrepe za boj proti goljufijam, poročilo vključuje oddelek z informacijami o strategijah za boj proti goljufijam, od leta 2017 pa tudi oddelek o zaščiti proračuna EU.
The Commission will give further consideration to the most suitable way of presenting its anti-fraud policies in the AMPR. 
Komisija bo dodatno preučila najprimernejši način za predstavitev svojih politik boja proti goljufijam v letnem poročilu o upravljanju in smotrnosti izvrševanja.
However, this corporate report, which covers the whole spectrum of Commission policies and activities, will have to retain its summarising nature. 
Vendar bo moralo to interno poročilo, ki pokriva celoten spekter politik in dejavnosti Komisije, ohraniti svojo zbirno naravo.
More information on the Commission's anti-fraud actions is provided in the annual PIF Report and in the Annual Activity Reports of the Directorates-General. 
Več informacij o ukrepih Komisije za boj proti goljufijam je zagotovljenih v letnem poročilu o zaščiti finančnih interesov in letnih poročilih o dejavnostih generalnih direktoratov.
The latter include a subsection dedicated to fraud prevention and detection. 
Slednja vključujejo pododdelek, namenjen preprečevanju in odkrivanju goljufij.
The Commission agrees with the ECA on the desirability of increasing the result orientation and measurability of its anti-fraud action. 
Komisija se strinja z Evropskim računskim sodiščem, da bi bilo zaželeno povečati usmerjenost v rezultate in merljivost njenih ukrepov za boj proti goljufijam.
See also Commission's reply to paragraph 60. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 60.
The Commission underlines that Article 125(4)(c) of the Common Provisions Regulation has provided the framework for the Commission services to reinforce their anti-fraud efforts in the 2014–2020 ESI Funds. 
Komisija poudarja, da je člen 125(4)(c) uredbe o skupnih določbah službam Komisije zagotovil okvir za okrepitev njihovih prizadevanj v boju proti goljufijam v skladih ESI za obdobje 2014– 2020.
However, already during the 2007-2013 programming period, the Commission services implemented effective and proportionate irregularity controls before spending occurred with a view to protect and safeguard the EU budget. 
Vendar so službe Komisije že v programskem obdobju 2007–2013, tj. pred nastankom porabe, uvedle učinkovite in sorazmerne kontrole nepravilnosti, namenjene zaščiti in obvarovanju proračuna EU.
An overview of achievements of the Commission's earlier fraud-proofing measures is presented in a Commission Staff Working Document of 2007.5 For the Programming Period 2007–2013, the Commission initiated e.g. a review of Member States' obligations to report irregularities under shared management.6 Sector-specific legislation in the domain of shared management contains provisions on irregularities, of which fraud is a sub-category; those provisions have been in place for a long time. 
Pregled dosežkov zgodnejših ukrepov Komisije za zagotovitev neprepustnosti za goljufije je predstavljen v delovnem dokumentu služb Komisije iz leta 20075. Za programsko obdobje 2007– 2013 je Komisija dala na primer pobudo za pregled obveznosti držav članic, da prijavljajo nepravilnosti v okviru deljenega upravljanja6. Sektorska zakonodaja na področju deljenega upravljanja vsebuje določbe o nepravilnostih, med katerimi so goljufije ena od podkategorij; te določbe se uporabljajo že dolgo.
The study initiated by the Commission on “Preventing fraud and corruption in the European Structural and Investment Funds – taking stock of practices in the EU Member States” provides an overview of the Member States implementation of article 125(4)(c) of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR). 
Študija, katere pobudnica je bila Komisija, z naslovom „Preprečevanje goljufij in korupcije v evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladih – pregled praks v državah članicah EU“, vsebuje pregled izvajanja člena 125(4)(c) uredbe o skupnih določbah v državah članicah.
This study was finalised in 2018 and amongst others gives an overview of practices and actions taken in the Member States. 
Ta študija je bila dokončana leta 2018, med drugim pa zagotavlja pregled praks in ukrepov, sprejetih v državah 5 6 SEC(2007) 1676.
The study is considered as a first step and on the basis of its findings follow up and further actions will be considered by the Commission. 
članicah. Študija se šteje za prvi korak, Komisija pa bo na podlagi njenih ugotovitev razmislila o nadaljnjih in dodatnih ukrepih.
The lack of a standardised procedure for the follow-up of administrative recommendations, which are all different, cannot be interpreted as lack of impact of such recommendations. 
Neobstoj standardiziranega postopka za nadaljnje ukrepanje na podlagi upravnih priporočil, ki so različna, se ne sme razlagati, kot da taka priporočila nimajo učinka.
OLAF is, in fact, working on the outcome of such recommendations on a case-by-case basis. 
Urad OLAF si dejansko za vsak primer posebej prizadeva, da bi taka priporočila imela rezultat.
13 Commission are currently exploring how to strengthen the monitoring of the follow-up to OLAF's administrative recommendations. 
Urad OLAF in Komisija trenutno preučujeta, kako na podlagi priporočil urada OLAF okrepiti spremljanje nadaljnjega ukrepanja.
Assessment of fraud risk is part of the Commission’s framework for conducting impact assessments of legislative proposals. 
Ocena tveganja goljufij je del okvira Komisije za izvajanje ocen učinka zakonodajnih predlogov.
This is a key principle of proportionate analysis underpinning the Commission's impact assessment system. 
To je ključno načelo sorazmerne analize, na kateri temelji sistem ocene učinka Komisije.
The Better Regulation Guidelines prior to 2017 did not prevent fraud risk assessments. 
Smernice za boljše pravno urejanje pred letom 2017 niso preprečevale ocen tveganja goljufij.
For the 2014–2020 period, such assessments were carried out, even if not required by the Better Regulation Guidelines at the time. 
V obdobju 2014–2020 so se take ocene izvajale, čeprav se takrat niso zahtevale s smernicami za boljše pravno urejanje.
Spending programmes were fraud-proofed in cooperation between the spending departments and OLAF, in accordance with the 2007 Commission Communication on fraud-proofing and the 2011 CAFS. 
Neprepustnost programov porabe za goljufije je bila v skladu s sporočilom Komisije iz leta 2007 o neprepustnosti za goljufije in strategijo Komisije za boj proti goljufijam iz leta 2011 zagotovljena v sodelovanju med plačilnimi oddelki in uradom OLAF.
The 2017 revision of the Better Regulation Guidelines now explicitly provides for a fraud prevention tool. 
Smernice za boljše pravno urejanje, revidirane leta 2017, zdaj izrecno zagotavljajo orodje za preprečevanje goljufij.
Prevention, detection, correction and follow-up of fraud and irregularities are amongst the objectives of internal controls (Article 32 of the Financial Regulation). 
Preprečevanje, odkrivanje, odpravljanje goljufij in nepravilnosti ter nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi z njimi spadajo med cilje notranjih kontrol (člen 32 finančne uredbe).
In the context of shared management, which concerns 80% of the EU budget, the risk of fraud has to be assessed by the managing authority in its programme's context (Article 125(4)(c) of the Common Provisions Regulation). 
V okviru deljenega upravljanja, ki zadeva 80 % proračuna EU, mora tveganje goljufij oceniti organ upravljanja v okviru svojega programa (člen 125(4)(c) uredbe o skupnih določbah).
The proposals for the 2021–2027 programmes contain a provision requiring that the authority responsible for managing the programme "put in place effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures and procedures, taking account of the risks identified". 
Predlogi programov za obdobje 2021–2027 vsebujejo določbo, s katero se zahteva, da organ, odgovoren za upravljanje programa, „uvede učinkovite in sorazmerne ukrepe in postopke za boj proti goljufijam, pri čemer upošteva ugotovljena tveganja“.
This provision, once adopted, will apply to the seven shared management funds covered by the Common Provisions Regulation. 
Ko bo ta določba sprejeta, se bo uporabljala za sedem skladov deljenega upravljanja, zajetih z uredbo o skupnih določbah.
While the requirement of fraud risk assessments in the process of designing spending programmes will be formalised even more strongly for the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) post-2020, fraud-proofing was already a principle upheld by the Commission in the current MFF. 
Čeprav bo zahteva po ocenah tveganja goljufij v postopku zasnove programov porabe za večletni finančni okvir po letu 2020 oblikovana še strožje, je bila neprepustnost za goljufije načelo, ki ga je Komisija uporabila že v sedanjem večletnem finančnem okviru.
More specifically, the Commission considers that it has properly addressed the issue of fraud prevention and detection controls by proposing a range of substantial measures in each of its legislative proposals of 29 May 2018 accompanying the MFF package:  the legislative financial statements list measures to be taken for preventing fraud and irregularities;  dedicated provisions identify who (e.g. Commission, Member States) shall impose proportionate anti-fraud measures and procedures, taking into account the risks identified;  a specific recital recalls the competences of OLAF (and EPPO from 2020) and lists the regulations from which those competences originate. 
Natančneje, Komisija meni, da je vprašanje kontrol za preprečevanje in odkrivanje goljufij ustrezno obravnavala s tem, ko je v vsakem od svojih zakonodajnih predlogov z dne 29. maja 2018, priloženih svežnju o večletnem finančnem okviru, predlagala vrsto obsežnih ukrepov:  v ocenah finančnih posledic zakonodajnega predloga so navedeni ukrepi, ki jih je treba sprejeti za preprečevanje goljufij in nepravilnosti;  s posebnimi določbami je opredeljeno, kdo (npr. Komisija, države članice) uvede sorazmerne ukrepe in postopke za boj proti goljufijam ob upoštevanju ugotovljenih tveganj;  v posebni uvodni izjavi so povzete pristojnosti urada OLAF (in od leta 2020 tudi EJT) in navedene uredbe, iz katerih te pristojnosti izhajajo.
OLAF has examined the pertinence of those measures for fraud-proofing prior to their adoption by the Commission. 
Urad OLAF je preučil ustreznost teh ukrepov za zagotovitev neprepustnosti za goljufije, preden jih je Komisija sprejela.
7 https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/better-regulation-toolbox-25_en. 14 
7 https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/better-regulation-toolbox-25_sl. 14
The Commission proposed in the Multiannual Financial Framework post-2020 spending programmes horizontal recitals and provisions regarding the protection of the EU financial interests against unreliable economic operators. 
Komisija je v programih porabe za večletni finančni okvir po letu 2020 predlagala horizontalne uvodne izjave in določbe v zvezi z zaščito finančnih interesov EU pred nezanesljivimi gospodarskimi subjekti.
In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the necessary and equivalent rights and access have been granted to the Commission, OLAF, the EPPO and the ECA. 
V skladu s finančno uredbo so bile potrebne in enakovredne pravice in dostop dodeljeni Komisiji, uradu OLAF, EJT in Evropskemu računskemu sodišču.
The possibility to reuse the contributions from the funds as provided for in Common Provisions Regulation serves as an incentive for the Member States to apply financial corrections themselves. 
Možnost ponovne uporabe prispevkov iz skladov, kot je določena v uredbi o skupnih določbah, države članice spodbuja, da same uporabijo finančne popravke.
The Commission provides systemic fraud proofing and is revising the way the fraud proofing is done in the context of the ongoing update of the CAFS. 
Komisija zagotavlja sistemsko neprepustnost za goljufije in pregleduje način zagotavljanja neprepustnosti za goljufije v okviru posodabljanja strategije Komisije za boj proti goljufijam, ki je v teku.
See also reply to paragraph 72. 
Glej tudi odgovor na odstavek 72.
Decisions on sanctions are not only based on information received by the entities listed in this observation. 
Odločitve o sankcijah ne temeljijo samo na informacijah, ki jih prejmejo subjekti, navedeni v tem opažanju.
They can also be based i.a. on information from audits by authorising officers or under their responsibility, disciplinary measures by competent supervisory bodies responsible for the verification of the application of standards of professional ethics, and decisions by the Commission or competent national authorities relating to the infringement of EU or national competition law. 
Med drugim lahko temeljijo tudi na informacijah iz revizij, ki jih opravijo odredbodajalci ali za katere so ti odgovorni, na disciplinskih ukrepih pristojnih nadzornih organov, odgovornih za preverjanje uporabe standardov poklicne etike, in na odločbah Komisije ali pristojnih nacionalnih organov v zvezi s kršitvijo konkurenčnega prava EU ali nacionalnega konkurenčnega prava.
In the future, facts established in the context of audits or investigations carried out by the EPPO should also be a source of information. 
V prihodnje bi morala biti vir informacij tudi dejstva, ugotovljena v okviru revizij ali preiskav, ki jih bo opravilo EJT.
Exclusion of unreliable economic operators on the basis of a recommendation by the panel referred to in Article 143 of the Financial Regulation (formerly Article 108 of the 2012 Financial Regulation) requires a certain procedure, to respect the right to be heard and the proportionality principle. 
Za izključitev nezanesljivih gospodarskih subjektov na podlagi priporočila posebne komisije iz člena143 finančne uredbe (prej člen108 finančne uredbe iz leta2012) je potreben poseben postopek, da se spoštujeta pravica do zaslišanja in načelo sorazmernosti.
Fraud or corruption frequently matches other grounds of exclusion. 
Goljufija in korupcija sta pogosto povezani z drugimi razlogi za izključitev.
Therefore, where exclusion for fraud or corruption was not legally possible for facts committed before 2016, exclusion was taken on other applicable grounds, such as grave professional misconduct and serious breach of contract, and the deterrent impact of the system was ensured. 
Kadar torej izključitev zaradi goljufije ali korupcije zakonsko ni bila mogoča za dejanja, storjena pred letom 2016, je bila izključitev sprejeta na podlagi drugih veljavnih razlogov, kot so hude kršitve poklicnih pravil in resna kršitev pogodbe, in odvračilni učinek sistema je bil zagotovljen.
For facts dating from before the entry into force of the new Financial Regulation in August 2018, the legislation will allow excluding natural persons in exclusion situations and who are essential for the award or for the implementation of legal commitments. 
Za dejanja, storjena pred začetkom veljavnosti nove finančne uredbe avgusta2018, bo zakonodaja omogočala izključitev fizičnih oseb, ki so v situacijah za izključitev in ki so ključne za dodelitev ali izvedbo pravnih obveznosti.
For facts dating from 2016 onwards, the Financial Regulation allows for the exclusion of economic operators where a manager is in a situation of exclusion. 
Za dejanja, storjena od leta 2016, finančna uredba omogoča izključitev gospodarskih subjektov, katerih direktor je v situaciji za izključitev.
Where applicable, the Commission will make use of this possibility and considers that other institutions and EU bodies should do the same. 
Komisija bo po potrebi uporabila to možnost, pri čemer meni, da bi morale enako storiti tudi druge instituciji in organi EU.
The new Financial Regulation provides for means to counter shell companies and the use of tax havens by intermediaries managing EU funds. 
Nova finančna uredba zagotavlja sredstva za boj proti slamnatim družbam in uporabi davčnih oaz s strani posrednikov, ki upravljajo finančna sredstva EU.
It is important to note that the legal constraints in which both systems operate are different. 
Poudariti je treba, da so pravne omejitve, v katerih oba sistema delujeta, različne.
In particular the World Bank decisions are not subject to appeal and/or national judicial legal orders. 
Zlasti odločitve Svetovne banke niso predmet pritožb in/ali nacionalnih pravnih redov.
Common reply to paragraphs 85 and 86: ARACHNE can form an important support for effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures according to Article 125(4)(c) of the Common Provisions Regulation (EU) 1303/2013. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavka 85 in 86: Orodje ARACHNE je lahko pomembna podpora za učinkovite in sorazmerne ukrepe za preprečevanje goljufij v skladu s členom 125(4)(c) uredbe o skupnih določbah (EU) št.
It is designed to help Member States authorities to prevent and detect errors and irregularities among projects, beneficiaries, contracts and contractors. 
Zasnovano je tako, da organom držav članic pomaga preprečevati ter odkrivati napake in nepravilnosti med projekti, upravičenci, pogodbami in pogodbenimi izvajalci.