natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
11. the audit covered the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 december 2012. the audit was carried out through interviews, the examination of documents held by the commission and the four audited Member state authorities, and an analysis of the data on reintegration rates.the audit in the Member states also included the organisation of eight focus group meetings at which the various local EGf stakeholders (academics, administrations and social partners) could share their views (see Picture 3). 
Revizija je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2012. Vključevala je razgovore, preučevanje dokumentacije Komisije in organov štirih revidiranih držav članic ter analizo podatkov o stopnjah ponovnega vključevanja. Revizija v državah članicah je vključevala tudi organizacijo osmih sestankov fokusne skupine, na katerih so lahko svoja mnenja izmenjali različni lokalni deležniki ESPG (akademiki, uprave in socialni partnerji) (glej sliko 3).
12. in addition to the above, the results of the commission’s mid-term evaluation of the EGf were analysed7. the mid-term evaluation report of december 2011 covered the first 15 cases8 co-financed by the EGf in eight Member states. one of these (nokia, Germany) was included in the sample audited on the spot by the court. 
Poleg zgoraj navedenega so bili analizirani tudi rezultati vmesne ocene ESPG, ki jo je opravila Komisija7. Poročilo o vmesni oceni iz decembra 2011 je zajemalo prvih 15 zadev8, ki jih je sofinanciral ESPG v osmih državah članicah. Ena od teh (Nokia, Nemčija) je bila vključena v vzorec zadev, ki jih je Sodišče revidiralo na kraju samem.
13. finally, the court carried out a survey by addressing questionnaires to Member states (Bulgaria, Estonia, cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Hungary, slovakia and the united Kingdom) in order to identify the reasons why they did not use the EGf. 
13. Sodišče je izvedlo tudi anketo, ki jo je naslovilo na države članice, ki niso uporabljale ESPG (Bolgarija, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Slovaška in Združeno kraljestvo), da bi ugotovilo razlog za to.
Picture 3 Academics andexpertsatafocusgroupmoderatedbytwoECAauditorsonEGF support for the Lithuanian construction sector. 7 ‘Mid-term evaluation of the European Globalisation adjustment fund: final report’, submitted by GHK to dG Employment, social affairs and inclusion, 2011 (http://.ec.europa.eu/social). 
Slika 3 Akademiki in strokovnjaki na sestanku fokusne skupine na temo podpore ESPG litovskemu gradbenemu sektorju, ki sta ga povezovala revizorja Evropskega računskega sodišča 7 Mid-term evaluation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: final report (vmesna ocena Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji: končno poročilo), ki ga je družba GHK predložila GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje, 2011 (http://ec.europa.eu/social).
8 BenQ (Germany), nokia (Germany), castilla y Leon and aragon (spain), catalonia (spain), dELpHi (spain), perlos (finland), psa suppliers (france), Lombardy (italy), piedmont (italy), sardinia (italy), tuscany (italy), alytaus tekstile (Lithuania), textiles (Malta), Lisbon-alentejo (portugal) and north-centre (portugal). 
8 BenQ (Nemčija), Nokia (Nemčija), Castilla y Léon in Aragón (Španija), Catalonia (Španija), DELPHI (Španija), Perlos (Finska), PSA suppliers (Francija), Lombardy (Italija), Piedmont (Italija), Sardinia (Italija), Tuscany (Italija), Alytaus tekstilė (Litva), Textiles (Malta), Lisbon-Alentejo (Portugalska) ter North-Centre (Portugalska).
10 Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? © European Court of Auditors. 
10 Posebno poročilo št. 7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU? © Evropsko računsko sodišče
11 obSErvatIoNS nEarly all workErs wErE offErEd pErsonalIsEd and wEll-coordInatEd mEasurEs 14. in order to demonstrate solidarity with all affected workers, personalised measures should be offered not only to the workers made redundant in the main enterprise affected, but also to those employed by suppliers of that enterprise. 
11 OPAŽANJA SKORAJ VSEM DELAVCEM SO BILI PONUJENI PRILAGOJENI IN DOBRO USKLAJENI UKREPI 14. Da bi izkazali solidarnost vsem prizadetim delavcem, bi bilo treba prilagojene ukrepe ponuditi ne samo odpuščenim delavcem v glavnem prizadetem podjetju, ampak tudi zaposlenim pri dobaviteljih tega podjetja.
15. in the audited cases nearly all affected workers could benefit from EGf measures. no instances of the intentional exclusion of potential beneficiaries were identified. 
15. V revidiranih zadevah so ukrepe ESPG lahko izkoristili skoraj vsi prizadeti delavci.
18. in ireland, the applications did not always establish the link between personalised services and actual labour market needs. as a result, at this stage, it was not identified whether the measures put forward were best suited to supporting the reintegration of the redundant workers. 
18. Na Irskem v vlogah ni bila vedno vzpostavljena povezava med prilagojenimi storitvami in dejanskimi potrebami na trgu dela. Zato v tej fazi ni bilo opredeljeno, ali so predloženi ukrepi najprimernejši za podpiranje ponovnega vključevanja presežnih delavcev.
9 some difficulties in reaching redundant workers of affected suppliers had already been identified by the mid-term evaluation. see mid-term evaluation, p. 
9 Nekatere težave pri doseganju presežnih delavcev prizadetih dobaviteljev so bile ugotovljene že pri vmesni oceni. Glej vmesno oceno, str.
12 EGf mEasurEs wErE GEnErally wEll-coordInatEd wIth natIonal mEasurEs and thE Esf 19. in order to maximise the effects of EGf measures, the EGf regulation states that they should always take the form of a coordinated package of personalised services. 
12 UKREPI ESPG SO BILI NA SPLOŠNO DOBRO USKLAJENI Z NACIONALNIMI UKREPI IN ESS 19. Uredba o ESPG določa, da bi morali biti ukrepi ESPG za čim večji učinek vedno del usklajenega svežnja prilagojenih storitev.
What is meant is coordination with measures preceding or concomitant to the personalised services co-financed by the EGf10. 
To pomeni, da bi morali biti usklajeni z ukrepi, ki so se izvajali pred prilagojenimi storitvami, ki jih sofinancira ESPG, ali istočasno10.
Member states should also coordinate their interventions with the structural funds11, in particular the Esf. 
Države članice bi morale svojo pomoč usklajevati tudi s strukturnimi skladi11, zlasti ESS.
20. the court observed that, generally, the Member states effectively coordinated the EGf with Esf and national labour market measures. 
20. Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so države članice ESPG in ESS na splošno uspešno usklajevale z nacionalnimi ukrepi na trgu dela.
Existing Esf measures were usually complemented by additional EGf measures specifically designed to address workers’ needs. 
Običajno so bili obstoječi ukrepi ESS dopolnjeni z dodatnimi ukrepi ESPG, ki so bili zasnovani posebej za potrebe delavcev.
Moreover, for the eight audited cases, the court did not detect instances of overlap between the different measures, or double funding of individuals. 
Poleg tega Sodišče pri nobeni od osmih revidiranih zadev ni odkrilo primerov prekrivanja različnih ukrepov ali podvojenega financiranja posameznikov.
10 see article 5 of the EGf regulation on the coordination information required at the application stage, and article 6 on complementarity and coordination. 
10 Glej člen 5 Uredbe o ESPG o informacijah za usklajevanje, ki so potrebne v fazi predložitve vloge, ter člen 6 o dopolnjevanju in usklajevanju.
somE mEmbEr statEs prEfErrEd thE Esf oVEr thE EGf 22. although the Esf is not expected to address unforeseeable events, all measures under the EGf regulation may equally be applied under the Esf12. 
13 NEKATERE DRŽAVE ČLANICE SO RAJE UPORABLJALE ESS KOT ESPG 22. Čeprav naj se ESS ne bi uporabljal za nepredvidljive dogodke, se vsi ukrepi v okviru Uredbe o ESPG lahko izvajajo tudi v okviru ESS12.
Whether or not the Esf may co-finance support for workers subject to a mass redundancy caused by an unforeseeable event essentially depends on the national eligibility rules and the content of operational programmes. 
Ali se iz ESS lahko sofinancira podpora za delavce, ki so bili žrtve množičnega odpuščanja presežnih delavcev zaradi nepredvidljivega dogodka, ali ne, je odvisno predvsem od nacionalnih pravil za upravičenost in vsebine operativnih programov.
23. the court’s survey of Member states having never used the EGf intervention concluded that the following were the main reasons for preferring the Esf over the EGf: (a) the higher co-financing rate for the Esf (up to 85 %) than for the EGf (up to 65 %) is a disincentive to apply for the latter. this was stated by six Member states13 and had already been recognised by the commission in 201014. (b) the Esf can be implemented more swiftly than the EGf, or national administrations are more familiar with the Esf15. (c) the lack of EGf pre-financing16. (d) the length of the procedure for approving EGf applications17. 
23. Anketa, ki jo je Sodišče izvedlo v državah članicah, ki niso nikoli uporabile pomoči ESPG, je pokazala naslednje razloge za dajanje prednosti ESS pred ESPG: (a) višja stopnja sofinanciranja ESS (do 85 %) v primerjavi z ESPG (do 65 %) odvrača od uporabe ESPG.
12 answer given on 19 april 2010 by the commissioner for Employment and social affairs to parliamentary question E-1230/2010. 
12 Odgovor komisarja za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve na poslansko vprašanje E-1230/2010 z dne 19. aprila 2010.
14 15 Bulgaria, cyprus and Hungary. 
15 Bolgarija, Ciper in Madžarska.
16 Bulgaria, Estonia, cyprus, Latvia, Hungary and slovakia. 
16 Bolgarija, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Madžarska in Slovaška.
17 Mentioned by Estonia, Latvia and Hungary. see also the issues paper concerning the permanent changes made in 2009 to regulation (Ec) no 1927/2006, ‘procedural changes’, 25 and 26 January 2011. 
17 Estonija, Latvija in Madžarska. Glej tudi dokument za razpravo v zvezi s trajnimi spremembami Uredbe (ES) št.
18 according to the commission, the united Kingdom Esf has been redirected towards providing training for redundant workers after mass redundancies. 
18 Po navedbah Komisije je bil ESS Združenega kraljestva po množičnih odpuščanjih presežnih delavcev preusmerjen v zagotavljanje usposabljanja zanje.
rEIntEGratIon Into EmploymEnt of EGf-supportEd workErs cannot bE rElIably assEssEd 25. in order to assess the performance of a fund it is necessary to monitor and evaluate its results and impacts and to compare them to other schemes having similar objectives. taking into account its objective, the EGf’s most relevant performance indicator is its capacity to reintegrate redundant workers. 
PONOVNEGA VKLJUČEVANJA DELAVCEV, KI SO DOBILI PODPORO ESPG, V DELOVNO RAZMERJE NI MOGOČE ZANESLJIVO OCENITI 25. Da bi ocenili učinkovitost sklada, je treba spremljati in ovrednotiti njegove rezultate in učinke ter jih primerjati z drugimi shemami, ki imajo podobne cilje.
26. the court verified that the reintegration rates calculated as a percentage of the reintegrated workers out of the affected workers were available for all eight audited cases. 
26. Sodišče je preverilo, ali so bile stopnje ponovnega vključevanja, izračunane kot odstotek ponovno vključenih delavcev glede na vse presežne delavce, na voljo za vseh osem revidiranih zadev.
Table 2 shows these percentages for different standard cut-off periods. tablE 2 rEIntEGratIon ratEs for thE EIGht audItEd casEs 14 Nokia Karmann Danfoss Odense Dell SR Technics AB Snaige ‘Construction’ DE DE DK DK IE IE LT LT Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Affected workers, of whom: 1 337 2 476 1 021 1 358 2 840 1 135 751 1 612 Participants in EGF measures 1 305 98 % 1 740 70 % 385 38 % 568 42 % 2 606 92 % 756 67 % 457 61 % 773 48 % Cumulative reintegration of participants: at the end of the EGF 385 30 % 636 37 % 89 23 % 198 35 % 560 21 % NA NA 162 35 % 453 59 % between 3 and 12 months after the end of the EGF 627 48 % NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 272 49 % 334 44 % 159 35 % 410 53 % 12 months after the end of the EGF NA NA 1 178 68 % 136 35 % NA NA NA NA NA NA 191 42 % 458 59 % Notes: Source: Member states. —all data based on Member state data. reintegration data are not precise. —reintegrated participants are either self-employed or employed in the labour market at the time in question. —na = number or percentage of workers not available. 
Tabela 2 prikazuje te odstotke za različna standardna razmejitvena obdobja. TABELA 2 STOPNJE PONOVNEGA VKLJUČEVANJA ZA OSEM REVIDIRANIH ZADEV 14 Nokia Karmann Danfoss Odense Dell SR Technics AB Snaige „Construction“ DE DE DK DK IE IE LT LT število % število % število % število % število % število % število % število % Presežni delavci 1 337 2 476 1 021 1 358 2 840 1 135 751 1 612 Od njih udeleženci v ukrepih ESPG 1 305 98 % 1 740 70 % 385 38 % 568 42 % 2 606 92 % 756 67 % 457 61 % 773 48 % Ponovno vključevanje udeležencev: na koncu ESPG 385 30 % 636 37 % 89 23 % 198 35 % 560 21 % NA NA 162 35 % 453 59 % od 3 do 12 mesecev po koncu ESPG 627 48 % NV NV NV NV NV NV 1 272 49 % 334 44 % 159 35 % 410 53 % od 3 do 12 mesecev po koncu ESPG NV NV 1 178 68 % 136 35 % NV NV NV NV NV NV 191 42 % 458 59 % Opombe: – Vsi podatki temeljijo na podatkih držav članic.
Whilst reintegration data at the end of the EGf measures were available for all employers except in the case of sr technics, data were often not available (‘na’) for the other cut-off periods shown in Table 2. in the case of odense steel shipyard (i), due to the timing of the EGf measures19, there were no data available about the situation of affected workers after 1 year. a complete overview was possible only for Lithuania. the table shows that the EGf made a certain contribution to the reintegration of redundant workers. 
Medtem ko so bili podatki o ponovnem vključevanju za obdobje po končanih ukrepih ESPG na voljo za vse delodajalce, razen za zadevo SR Technics, ti podatki za druga razmejitvena obdobja, prikazana v tabeli 2, pogosto niso bili na voljo („NV“). V zadevi podjetja Odense Steel Shipyard (I) zaradi časovnega okvira ukrepov ESPG19 ni bilo razpoložljivih podatkov o razmerah presežnih delavcev po enem letu. Popoln pregled je bil mogoč samo za Litvo.
30. secondly, in Germany, denmark and ireland, the public or private employment services, when collecting reintegration data, did not systematically differentiate between the EGf, the Esf and other national measures specifically designed for workers affected by mass redundancies. 
30. Drugi je ta, da javni ali zasebni zavodi za zaposlovanje v Nemčiji ter na Danskem in Irskem pri zbiranju podatkov o ponovnem vključevanju niso sistematično razlikovali med ukrepi ESPG, ESS in drugimi nacionalnimi ukrepi, ki so bili namenjeni posebej delavcem, ki jih je prizadelo množično odpuščanje presežnih delavcev.
31. for instance, in Germany, the combination of several Esf and EGf-funded training modules made it difficult to isolate the impact of individual measures, or groups of measures, on reintegration21. 
31. V Nemčiji, na primer, je določanje učinka posameznih ukrepov ali skupine ukrepov na ponovno vključevanje otežilo kombiniranje več modulov usposabljanja, financiranih iz ESS in ESPG21.
External factors (overall economic situation, involvement of Volkswagen in the case of Karmann, employment subsidies) also had an important impact on reintegration. 
Pomemben vpliv na ponovno vključevanje so imeli tudi zunanji dejavniki (splošne gospodarske razmere, vpletenost Volkswagna pri zadevi Karmann, subvencije za zaposlovanje).
19 the EGf was applied for on 6 october 2011 and the final report would not be due before 5 March 2014. 
19 Vloga za prispevek ESPG je bila oddana 6. oktobra 2011, končno poročilo pa je treba oddati do 5. marca 2014.
20 odense steel shipyard (i) case: this observation was confirmed by the court’s audit of a sample of individual beneficiaries having benefited from the EGf. the objective was that 25 % of the participants should be in employment 6 months after expiry of the EGf measures. that objective was almost met 11 months in advance. 
20 Zadeva Odense Steel Shipyard (I): to opažanje je potrdila revizija vzorca posameznih upravičencev, ki so prejeli pomoč ESPG, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče. Cilj je bil, da je šest mesecev po končanih ukrepih ESPG zaposlenih 25 % udeležencev. Dosežen je bil skoraj 11 mesecev prej.
21 this observation was confirmed by the audit’s analysis of a sample of individual beneficiaries having benefitted from the EGf in Germany, as well as by an evaluation of 16 september 2012 commissioned by the managing authority, p. 
21 To ugotovitev sta potrdila analiza vzorca posameznih upravičencev v Nemčiji, ki so prejeli pomoč ESPG, izvedena v okviru revizije, in vrednotenje z dne 16. septembra 2012, ki ga je naročil organ upravljanja, str.
4; Bundesministerium für arbeit und soziales, ‘der Europäische Globalisierungsfonds in deutschland: Eine untersuchung und Bewertung seiner umsetzung und potenziale’, october 2012, pp. 2, 9, 10, 72, 88 (http://www.bmas.de). 15 Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
4; Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (zvezno ministrstvo za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve), Der Europäische Globalisierungsfonds in Deutschland: Eine Untersuchung und Bewertung seiner Umsetzung und Potenziale (Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji v Nemčiji: pregled in ocena izvajanja in potencialov), oktober 2012, str. 2, 9, 10, 72 in 88 (http://www.bmas.de). 15 Posebno poročilo št.
32. thirdly, Member state authorities audited generally did not distinguish between the two main kinds of EGf measures: (a) active labour market measures such as training, aid for self-employment, coaching and outplacement; (b) income support paid to workers. 
32. Tretji dejavnik je bil ta, da revidirani organi držav članic niso razlikovali med glavnima vrstama ukrepov ESPG: (a) aktivni ukrepi na trgu dela, kot so usposabljanje, pomoč za samozaposlitev, svetovanje in pomoč pri iskanju nove zaposlitve; (b) dohodkovna podpora, ki se plača delavcem.
Whilst this significant distinction was absent in Germany, denmark and ireland, the Lithuanian managing authority went so far as to provide reintegration data that distinguished between the workers participating in each of the various measures. 
Medtem ko v Nemčiji ter na Danskem in Irskem tega pomembnega razlikovanja ni bilo, je litovski organ upravljanja zagotovil celo podatke o ponovnem vključevanju, iz katerih je razvidno razlikovanje med delavci, ki so sodelovali v vseh različnih ukrepih.
However, in the context of the EGf an additional element hampered this comparison. this refers to the differences between the timing of the EGf and that of other labour market actions, as those workers in greater need of help were left to the EGf, which is relatively slower to implement (see Box 2 and paragraph 42). 
Pri ESPG pa je to primerjavo oviral še dodaten element, in sicer razlike med časovnim okvirom ESPG in drugih ukrepov na trgu dela, saj so bili bolj pomoči potrebni delavci prepuščeni ESPG, ki se izvaja relativno počasi (glej okvir 2 in odstavek 42).
22 see paragraph 51 of special report no 17/2009 concerning vocational training actions for women co-financed by the European social fund; paragraphs 63 and 64 of special report no 25/2012 ‘are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European social fund spending on older workers?’ (http://eca.europa.eu). 
22 Glej odstavek 51 posebnega poročila št. 17/2009 o dejavnostih za poklicno usposabljanje žensk, ki se sofinancirajo iz Evropskega socialnega sklada ter odstavka 63 in 64 posebnega poročila št. 25/2012 – Ali obstajajo orodja za spremljanje uspešnosti porabe Evropskega socialnega sklada za starejše delavce? (http://eca.europa.eu).
37. in particular, given that the Esf and EGf both support the training and reintegration of the unemployed, such a comparison is necessary with respect to sound financial management as it could highlight potential structural problems. the example below (Box 2) illustrates this. 
37. Glede na to, da oba sklada, ESS in ESPG, podpirata usposabljanje in ponovno vključevanje brezposelnih, je takšna primerjava nujna zlasti z vidika dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, saj bi lahko pokazala potencialne strukturne probleme.
38. the above example shows that timeliness is one of the most important criteria when a fund including reintegration objectives aims at some degree of success. the nokia case also shows that the EGf and Esf both supported the same target group, but for reasons diametrically opposed to the purpose for which each fund was designed. the Esf, a structural fund, alleviated an emergency; the EGf, an emergency fund, supported those whom it was more difficult to reintegrate. 
38. Zgornji primer prikazuje, da je pravočasnost eno najpomembnejših meril za dosego neke stopnje uspešnosti sklada pri doseganju ciljev v zvezi s ponovnim vključevanjem. Iz zadeve Nokia je razvidno tudi, da sta ESPG in ESS podpirala isto ciljno skupino, vendar iz razlogov, ki so v popolnem nasprotju z namenom, za katerega sta bila sklada ustanovljena.
39. in fact the EGf and Esf intervene as complementary funds which provide either long-term strategic help, or act as a one-off time-limited and specific response to a single restructuring emergency. 
39. ESPG in ESS delujeta kot dopolnjujoča se sklada, ki bodisi zagotavljata dolgoročno strateško pomoč bodisi delujeta kot enkraten časovno omejen in specifičen odziv na nujne primere, kjer je potrebno prestrukturiranje.
IrEland 42. surveys conducted by the managing authority concluded that, within the same time frame, the employment rate for redundant workers who did not benefit from the EGf was higher than the employment rate for EGf beneficiaries. the difference in employment rates can be partially explained by the fact that some persons did not finalise training or education pathways. 
IRSKA 42. Iz anket, ki jih je izvedel organ upravljanja, je razvidno, da je bila v istem časovnem okviru stopnja zaposlenosti presežnih delavcev, ki niso dobili pomoči ESPG, višja kot pri upravičencih tega sklada.
43. nonetheless, according to the managing authority, a probable cause of the EGf’s lower reintegration rate in ireland would be differences between the profiles of redundant workers, the most skilled workers finding a job without EGf help. lIthuanIa 44. 
43. Po navedbah organa upravljanja pa so verjeten razlog za nižjo stopnjo ponovnega vključevanja, ki jo je dosegel ESPG na Irskem, razlike med profili presežnih delavcev, saj so najbolj kvalificirani delavci zaposlitev našli brez pomoči ESPG.
EGf reintegration results varied significantly from one EGf project to another, depending on the measures implemented and the target group addressed, which made a straightforward comparison impossible. Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
Rezultati v zvezi s ponovnim vključevanjem s pomočjo ESPG so se bistveno razlikovali med različnimi projekti ESPG, saj so bili odvisni od izvedenih ukrepov in ciljne skupine, zaradi česar enostavna primerjava ni bila mogoča. Posebno poročilo št. 7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU?
19 thE commIssIon 45. 
19 KOMISIJA 45.
Monitoring information was only available to the commission in the form of the EGf final reports, 6 months after the end of the implementation period. 
Podatki o spremljanju so bili Komisiji na voljo samo v obliki končnih poročil o ESPG šest mesecev po koncu obdobja izvajanja.
However, as a result of the inconsistency and unreliability of the reintegration data (see paragraphs 25 to 44), these reports prevent any reasonable comparison between different EGf cases, or between the measures applied in each case. 
Toda ta poročila zaradi nedoslednosti in nezanesljivosti podatkov o ponovnem vključevanju (glej odstavke od 25 do 44) ne omogočajo zanesljive primerjave med različnimi zadevami ESPG ali med ukrepi, ki so se uporabili v posameznih zadevah. 46.