natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When used to co-finance services for redundant workers or allowances not ordinarily existing under Member state unemployment benefit systems, the EGf delivered Eu added value. this refers in particular to active measures aiming at the improvement of the beneficiaries’ prospect of finding gainful employment or otherwise increasing their earnings’ capacity such as training, aid for self-employment, coaching and outplacement, mobility allowances and educational grants (paragraphs 47 to 49). 
ESGP je dodano vrednost EU ustvaril, ko so se njegova sredstva uporabljala za sofinanciranje storitev za presežne delavce ali nadomestil, ki praviloma v sistemih nadomestil za brezposelnost držav članic ne obstajajo. To še posebej velja za aktivne ukrepe, ki so namenjeni temu, da se izboljšajo možnosti upravičencev za pridobitev plačane zaposlitve ali povečajo njihove zmožnosti za zaslužek, kot so usposabljanje, pomoč za samozaposlitev, svetovanje in iskanje nove zaposlitve, nadomestila za mobilnost ter štipendije (odstavki od 47 do 49).
79. the commission did not sufficiently monitor the weight of workers’ support measures (paragraphs 45 to 46). in addition, different Member state decisions may result in different EGf co-funding for similar income support measures (paragraphs 57 to 59). 
79. Komisija ni dovolj spremljala deleža, ki ga predstavljajo ukrepi podpore za delavce (odstavka 45 in 46). Poleg tega lahko različne odločitve držav članic povzročijo različno sofinanciranje ESPG za podobne ukrepe dohodkovne podpore (odstavki od 57 do 59).
thE EGf approVal procEdurE Is too lonG for an EmErGEncy fund 80. the EGf approval procedure is very long. this has a deterrent effect as regards the use of the EGf and consequently hampers Eu solidarity with the redundant workers targeted. 
POSTOPEK ODOBRITVE ESPG JE PREVEČ DOLGOTRAJEN ZA SKLAD ZA NUJNE PRIMERE 80. Postopek odobritve ESPG je zelo dolgotrajen. To odvrača od uporabe ESPG, in posledično preprečuje solidarnost EU z odpuščenimi delavci, ki jim je pomoč namenjena.
81. in addition, the need for a budgetary procedure adds to the overall length of approval (paragraphs 60 to 69). 
81. K skupni dolgotrajnosti postopka odobritve prispeva tudi potreba po proračunskem postopku (odstavki od 60 do 69).
29 rEcommEndatIon 2 the European parliament, the Council and the Commission should consider limiting Eu funding to measures likely to provide Eu added value, rather than funding already existing national workers’ income support schemes. rEcommEndatIon 3 the European parliament, the Council and the Commission should consider, as an alternative to the EGf scheme, the possibility of adapting the ESf framework in order to support more rapidly workers affected by mass redundancies. this report was adopted by chamber ii, headed by Mr Harald noacK, Member of the court of auditors, on 10 June 2013. 
29 PRIPOROČILO 2 Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija bi morali razmisliti o omejitvi sredstev EU na ukrepe, ki bodo najverjetneje ustvarili dodano vrednost EU, namesto da se z njimi financirajo že obstoječe nacionalne sheme dohodkovne podpore za delavce. PRIPOROČILO 3 Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija naj kot nadomestni možnosti za sedanjo shemo ESPG razmislijo o možnosti prilagoditve okvira ESS, da bi hitreje zagotovili podporo delavcem, ki jih je prizadelo množično odpuščanje presežnih delavcev.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da siLVa caLdEira President Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
Harald NOACK, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na svojem zasedanju 10. junija 2013 Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik Posebno poročilo št. 7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU?
30 Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? rEplY of tHE CommISSIoN executive Summary i. since 2006, the EGf has delivered a significant European added value towards workers affected by mass redundancies due to major structural changes in world trade patterns resulting from globalisation. it does so by assisting workers, supporting their reintegration into employment, business start-ups or targeted training actions. 
30 Posebno poročilo št. 7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU? ODGOVORI KOMISIJE POVZETEK I. Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji od leta 2006 ustvarja bistveno evropsko dodano vrednost pri delavcih, ki jih je prizadelo množično odpuščanje zaradi velikih strukturnih sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih, ki so posledica globalizacije.
However, the commission has not been informed that any affected workers were ever intentionally excluded. (b) the decision whether to apply for Esf or EGf funding is made at Member state level, on the condition that the Esf operational programme agreed with the commission is compatible with such contemplated Esf support. indeed Esf operational programmes differ from one Member state/region to another. 
Vendar ni Komisija izvedela za noben primer namerne izključitve katerega od prizadetih delavcev. (b) Odločitev o predložitvi vloge za financiranje iz ESS ali ESPG se sprejme na ravni držav članic, če je operativni program ESS, ki ga je potrdila Komisija, združljiv s predvideno podporo ESS. Operativni programi ESS se med državami članicami/regijami dejansko razlikujejo.
However, it is important to note that procedures do not determine the speed at which support for workers arrives, nor does it hamper solidarity. 
Vseeno je treba poudariti, da postopki ne vplivajo na to, kako hitro bodo delavci prejeli podporo niti ne ovirajo solidarnosti.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN obServationS 16. the commission acknowledges that some redundant workers who were eligible may not have been included in EGf applications. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE OPAŽANJA 16. Komisija potrjuje, da nekateri upravičeni presežni delavci morda niso bili vključeni v vloge za podporo iz ESPG.
However, the commission has not been informed that any affected workers were ever intentionally excluded. secondly, identifying all enterprises and persons concerned takes time and effort. 
Vendar ni Komisija izvedela za noben primer namerne izključitve katerega od prizadetih delavcev. Poleg tega sta za opredelitev vseh zadevnih podjetij in oseb potrebna čas in trud.
Hence, at some stage the Member state may have decided to move ahead with the file, considering the cost (in terms of both finance and time) associated with finding any additional potentially eligible workers to be disproportionate to likely benefits. furthermore, even when not included, affected workers might have received other forms of assistance. 
Zato se je država članica na neki točki morda odločila, da predloži vlogo, ker so po njenem mnenju stroški (tako finančni kot časovni), povezani z iskanjem dodatnih potencialno upravičenih delavcev, nesorazmerni s pričakovanimi koristmi. Ob tem pa so tudi tisti prizadeti delavci, ki niso bili vključeni, morda že prejeli drugo obliko podpore.
Based on the submitted final reports of EGf cases in ireland, the commission considers that an effort has been made by the Member state to establish the link between personalised services and actual labour market needs. 
Na podlagi predloženih končnih poročil o zadevah ESPG na Irskem Komisija meni, da si je ta država članica prizadevala vzpostaviti povezavo med prilagojenimi storitvami in dejanskimi potrebami na trga dela.
23. (a) the observation of the court only applies to those Member states with higher co-financing rates such as the ones listed by the court and cannot be deduced as a general rule. 
23. (a) Opažanje Sodišča velja samo za države članice z višjimi stopnjami sofinanciranja, na primer tiste, ki jih je naštelo Sodišče, in se ne more šteti za splošno pravilo.
24. the commission understands that the united Kingdom never applied for EGf funding because of political reasons rather than due to reasons connected with the EGf itself. 
24. Komisija razume, da ni Združeno kraljestvo nikoli predložilo vloge za financiranje iz ESPG iz političnih razlogov, in ne iz razlogov, povezanih s samim ESPG.
33 27. comparisons with international data sources, and in particular with Eurostat data, suggest that integration rates are satisfactory despite the very difficult context. table 2 shows that, on average, 34 % of all participants in the cases audited by the court had already been reintegrated by the end of the EGf assistance, almost 46 % between 3 and 12 months after the end of the EGf assistance and over 51 % of persons reintegrated 12 months after the end of the EGf assistance. the main conclusions of the mid-term evaluation report on the EGf between 2007 and april 2009 indicated an average re-employment rate of 42 % among affected workers immediately after the end of the EGf implementation period across the 15 EGf cases evaluated. this can be considered as a very good result. 
33 27. Primerjave z mednarodnimi viri podatkov, zlasti s podatki Eurostata, kažejo, da so stopnje vključevanja kljub zelo težkim okoliščinam zadovoljive. V tabeli 2 je prikazano, da je bilo povprečno 34 % vseh udeležencev v zadevah, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, do zaključka podpore ESPG že ponovno vključenih v delovno razmerje, od tega skoraj 46 % v 3 do 12 mesecih po koncu podpore ESPG ter več kot 51 % v 12 mesecih po izteku podpore iz ESPG.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 32. income support was never provided as a stand-alone measure. in line with the EGf regulation, it was always part of a package combined with active labour market policy measures which achieve the positive effects confirmed by the mid-term evaluation and many final reports of EGf cases. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 32. Dohodkovna podpora ni bila nikoli zagotovljena kot samostojen ukrep. V skladu z Uredbo o ESPG je bila vedno povezana z aktivnimi ukrepi na trgu dela, ki dosegajo pozitivne učinke, potrjene z vmesno oceno in številnimi končnimi poročili o zadevah ESPG.
Member states acted in accordance with article 3 of regulation (Ec) no 1927/2006 (‘Eligible actions’) when designing the relevant package of personalised EGf measures. during the implementation period, this package of measures is carried out with EGf assistance. these include general job search assistance, training, job search allowances, training allowances, support for entrepreneurship, geographical mobility and employment subsidies. 
1927/2006 („Upravičeni ukrepi“). Med obdobjem izvajanja se ta sveženj ukrepov izvaja s podporo iz ESPG. Med njimi so splošna pomoč pri iskanju zaposlitve, usposabljanje, nadomestila za iskanje zaposlitve, nadomestila za usposabljanje, podpora podjetništvu, geografska mobilnost, subvencije za zaposlitev itd. 34.
34. the purpose of Esf monitoring data is not to identify tens of thousands of (potential) Esf projects supported through the current 117 Esf operational programmes (2007–13). instead, the remit of this monitoring is to collect statistics on the implementation of programmes through financial data (broken down by priorities as defined in the Esf regulation) and data on the number of persons supported (including breakdowns by gender, educational attainment, etc.). as regards the quality of Esf monitoring data, the commission notes that: (a) the quality of indicators is constantly improving; (b) the commission takes action in monitoring committee meetings when it considers the result indicators are insufficient; (c) the commission checks how actions meet their targets on the basis of all information received and through ex post evaluation. for the period 2014–20, the commission has proposed mandatory output and result indicators. 
Namen podatkov o spremljanju v okviru ESS ni opredeliti na deset tisoče (potencialnih) projektov ESS, ki jih podpira sedanjih 117 operativnih programov ESS (obdobje 2007– 2013). Pravi namen tega spremljanja je zbiranje statistike o izvajanju programov prek finančnih podatkov (prednostno razčlenjenih, kakor je opredeljeno v Uredbi o ESS) in podatkov o številu oseb, ki prejemajo podporo (vključno z razčlenitvijo po spolu, stopnji izobrazbe itd.). Komisija v zvezi s kakovostjo podatkov o spremljanju v okviru ESS ugotavlja: (a) kakovost kazalnikov se nenehno izboljšuje; (b) Komisija ukrepa na sejah odbora za spremljanje, kadar meni, da kazalniki rezultatov niso zadovoljivi; (c) Komisija na podlagi vseh prejetih informacij in z naknadnim vrednotenjem preveri, ali ukrepi dosegajo svoj cilj.
36. the EGf financing is to allow Member states to take actions on the ground after they have spent the amount set aside for co-financing; it does not determine their speed of implementation, nor should it influence the speed with which these actions are initiated. 
36. Financiranje iz ESPG mora državam članicam omogočati, da lahko ukrepajo „na kraju dogajanja“, ko so porabile znesek, namenjen sofinanciranju, pri tem pa ne opredeljuje hitrosti njihovega izvajanja niti ne bi smelo vplivati na hitrost začetka izvajanja ukrepov.
29. the commission notes that the EGf regulation does not include quantitative reintegration objectives and recalls that the various EGf measures can also be assessed through other indicators and by other means (such as evaluations). for the period 2014–20, the commission has proposed a reintegration objective of 50 % after 12 months of implementation. 
29. Komisija ugotavlja, da v Uredbi št. 1927/2006 o ESPG niso zajeti količinsko opredeljeni cilji za ponovno vključevanje, ter ponovno opozarja, da bi bilo mogoče različne ukrepe ESPG oceniti tudi z drugimi kazalniki in na druge načine (na primer z vrednotenji).
31. the commission underlines that the EGf and Esf are funds supporting complementary policy measures dealing with the labour market consequences of globalisation. in line with the principle of subsidiarity, the mix of EGf measures is designed at Member state level and is often similar to mainstream Esf provisions to support transitions back into employment. 
31. Komisija poudarja, da sta ESPG in ESS sklada, ki podpirata dopolnilne ukrepe politike za spoprijemanje s posledicami globalizacije na trgu dela. Kombinacija ukrepov ESPG je v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti oblikovana na ravni držav članic in je pogosto podobna osnovnim določbam ESS za podporo prehodov nazaj v delovno razmerje.
Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 34 it is the Member states’ responsibility to ensure that the right assistance reaches their unemployed workers as soon as possible. 
7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU? 34 Države članice morajo same zagotavljati, da njihovi brezposelni delavci čim prej prejmejo ustrezno podporo.
Late adoption of financing decisions for actions that should be (pre-) financed nationally should not be seen as an obstacle to enhancing the speed of implementation. 
Pozno sprejetje sklepov o financiranju za ukrepe, ki bi morali biti (predhodno) financirani na nacionalni ravni, se ne bi smelo šteti za oviro pri spodbujanju hitrosti izvajanja.
38. the EGf and Esf are complementary funds which provide either long-term strategic help or act as a one-off time-limited and specific response to a single restructuring ‘emergency’. if the EGf funds come in, for specific reasons valid in this case, later than other support funds, the EGf objective is nevertheless met. it must be noted that it is up to each Member state to manage the complementarity between the Esf and EGf in the best possible manner given the local conditions prevailing at the time. 
38. ESPG in ESS sta dopolnjujoča se sklada, ki bodisi zagotavljata dolgoročno strateško pomoč bodisi delujeta kot enkraten časovno omejen in specifičen odziv na posamezne „nujne primere“, kjer je potrebno prestrukturiranje.
43. in this global context, it should be noted that the commission cannot be aware at this stage of the possible impact of differences in the overall affected population and their respective employability. 
43. V navedenem globalnem okviru je treba poudariti, da se Komisija na tej stopnji ne more zavedati morebitnega učinka razlik v celotnem prizadetem prebivalstvu in njegovi zaposljivosti.
45. the commission notes that in general the reintegration data provided in the final reports of Member states is consistent and reliable. 
45. Komisija ugotavlja, da so podatki o ponovnem vključevanju, ki so jih države članice predložile v končnih poročilih, na splošno dosledni in zanesljivi.
When the analysis of the commission shows discrepencies, immediate action is taken. the final EGf reports have a predefined standard format, allowing an effective comparison of EGf-supported cases. the (audited) Member states have respected their reporting obligations as laid down in article 15 of the EGf regulation. at the same time, the commission considers that within the EGf, a reasonable cost-benefit balance has been struck when reviewing the obligations placed on Member states in terms of monitoring, reporting and evaluation and the quality and quantity of data provided. 
(Revidirane) države članice so upoštevale svoje obveznosti poročanja iz člena 15 Uredbe št. 1927/2006 o ESPG. Komisija hkrati meni, da je bilo znotraj ESPG vzpostavljeno ustrezno razmerje v smislu stroškov in koristi med obveznostmi držav članic v zvezi s spremljanjem, poročanjem in vrednotenjem, ter kakovostjo in količino predloženih podatkov.
Both sources are used for the database, allowing the extraction of in-depth information. it should be noted that final reports, by their very nature, become available 6 months after the end of the implementation period. 
V podatkovni zbirki sta uporabljena oba vira, kar omogoča pridobitev poglobljenih informacij. Treba je poudariti, da so končna poročila po svoji naravi vedno na voljo šele šest mesecev po zaključku obdobja izvajanja.
Hence, final data are not yet available for all cases, since for many cases implementation is ongoing. the commission is improving the monitoring of all support measures by further developing its database and providing for an interim report to be presented by Member states in its proposal for the EGf regulation for 2014–20. 
Zato še niso na voljo končni podatki za vse zadeve, saj se jih veliko še vedno izvaja. Komisija izboljšuje spremljanje vseh ukrepov podpore z nadaljnjim razvojem podatkovne zbirke in opredelitvijo vmesnega poročila, ki ga bodo morale predložiti države članice, v svojem predlogu uredbe o ESPG za obdobje 2014–2020.
47. the commission considers that the Eu level is the most appropriate level for dealing with the impact of changes in world trade patterns. 
47. Komisija meni, da je raven EU najustreznejša raven za spoprijemanje z učinkom sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih.
Based on that political view, it follows that Eu assistance should be provided to those suffering from the impact of globalisation. the conclusions of the mid-term evaluation final report (GHK, 2011) indicate that the EGf has delivered ‘significant added value’. furthermore, it also notes that ‘independent experts concluded that hardly any results would have been achieved without EGf support’. 
Na podlagi navedenega političnega stališča bi morali tisti, ki jih prizadenejo učinki globalizacije, prejemati podporo EU. V sklepnih ugotovitvah končnega poročila o vmesni oceni (družba GHK – 2011) je navedeno, da je ESPG ustvaril „bistveno dodano vrednost“. Poleg tega je še navedeno, da so „neodvisni strokovnjaki [...] sklenili, da brez podpore ESPG ne bi bilo mogoče doseči skoraj nobenih rezultatov“.
48. the EGf co-finances, on the basis of article 3, integrated support packages to workers, including allowances in relation to job search and mobility or allowances to individuals in lifelong learning and training activities. 
48. Iz ESPG se na podlagi člena 3 sofinancirajo svežnji celovite podpore delavcem, vključno z nadomestili za iskanje zaposlitve in mobilnost ali nadomestili posameznikom za dejavnosti vseživljenjskega učenja in usposabljanja.
Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 35 furthermore, the Eurostat labour market policy database methodology states (in line with the oEcd definition) that the unemployment benefits received by participants in labour market policy measures (instead of receiving training allowances, wages or similar) should be included as part of the expenditure for that measure and excluded from the amounts reported as unemployment benefits. rEplY of tHE CommISSIoN 52. article 3 of the EGf regulation does not exclude income support, provided that the support is an integral part of the package which includes, for example, training, mentoring, support for micro-business start-up, etc. 
7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU? 35 Poleg tega je v metodologiji Eurostata v zvezi s podatkovnimi zbirkami o trgu dela (v skladu z opredelitvijo OECD) navedeno, da bi morala biti nadomestila za brezposelnost, ki jih namesto nadomestil za usposabljanje, plač in drugega prejmejo udeleženci ukrepov s področja trga dela, vključena med odhodke navedenega ukrepa in izključena iz zneskov, prijavljenih kot nadomestila za brezposelnost.
Moreover, article 3 does not impose or exclude any minimum or maximum proportions of allowances. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 52. Člen 3 Uredbe št.
49. the commission does not wish to place undue emphasis on training measures, which are only one part of the package of eligible measures put together by the Member states. in addition, there is education, enterprise creation, career advice and counselling, internships, mentoring in a new job, peer group interaction and much more. 
Komisija je izvedla podobno analizo informacij, ki jih je predložila Avstrija, in ni ugotovila razlogov za njihovo zavrnitev. 49. Komisija ne želi po nepotrebnem poudarjati ukrepov usposabljanja, ki so le del svežnja upravičenih ukrepov, ki so ga sestavile države članice.
Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 
7/2013 – Ali je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji pri ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev ustvaril dodano vrednost EU?
Member states are entitled and encouraged to start implementing their planned measures as soon as they are ready and as early as possible, so that workers do not need to wait for the care to which they are entitled. they should clearly do so before the final approval by the budgetary authority of an application comes through. in other words, the fact that approval takes time should not impact a reasonably fast response ‘on the ground’. depending on the type of EGf case (article 2(a) or (b)), Member states have a 4-month or 9-month reference period during which the redundancies occur. this is followed by a 10-week period (article 5 of the EGf regulation) during which Member states finalise their applications. 
36 Skupni odgovor na odstavke 60–62 Države članice imajo pravico in se spodbujajo, da začnejo izvajati načrtovane ukrepe takoj, ko so pripravljene, tj. čim prej, da delavcem ne bo treba čakati podpore, do katere so upravičeni. To bi morale seveda storiti, preden proračunski organ dokončno odobri vlogo. Čeprav je odobritev časovno zamudna, to torej ne bi smelo vplivati na razumno hiter odziv „na kraju dogajanja“.
Member states make contact with the commission during both of these periods, and often already before the reference period, in cases where a large undertaking has announced future redundancies that could potentially be eligible for EGf assistance. all these contacts revolve around the application form and the necessary data to complete it. 
Države članice se v obeh navedenih obdobjih povežejo s Komisijo, pogosto pa to storijo že pred referenčnim obdobjem, če veliko podjetje napove odpuščanja, ki bi lahko bila upravičena do podpore ESPG.