natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
11 Forexample,the1982UnitedNationsConventionontheLawoftheSea(UNCLOS)givessignatorycoastalstatestherighttodeterminefishing rights in their exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which stretches 200 miles from the coast, and requires them to ensure that the maintenance of living resources is not endangered by exploitation: Article 61 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas, 10 December 1982, 1833 UNTS 396. 
11 Naprimer,KonvencijaZdruženihnarodovopomorskemmednarodnempravu(UNCLOS)izleta1982dajeobmorskimdržavampodpisnicam pravico, da določijo ribolovne pravice v svoji izključni ekonomski coni (IEC), ki sega 200 milj od obale, ter zahteva, da poskrbijo, da izkoriščanje ne ogroža ohranjanja živih virov: člen 61 Konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu, 10. december 1982, 1833 UNTS 396.
The convention entered into force 16 November 1994. 
Konvencija je začela veljati 16.
In 1999 the UN’s FAO adopted an action plan for the management of fishing capacity which provided that states should efficiently manage fishing capacity by 2005, including the limitation and progressive reduction of capacity in affected fisheries. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
Leta 1999 je FAO ZN sprejel akcijski načrt za upravljanje ribolovne zmogljivosti, v katerem je bilo predvideno, da bi morale države učinkovito upravljati ribolovno zmogljivost do leta 2005, vključno z omejitvijo in postopnim zmanjšanjem zmogljivosti v prizadetih vrstah ribolova. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
Recent scientific findings, quoted by the Commission in its consultations12 on fishing opportunities for 2011, showed improvements in the sustainability of fish stocks, while indicating continuing serious problems. 
Najnovejše znanstvene ugotovitve, ki jih je Komisija navedla v svojem posvetovanju12 o ribolovnih možnostih za leto 2011, so pokazale izboljšanje trajnosti ribjih staležev, hkrati pa kažejo, da še vedno obstajajo resne težave.
Box 1 illustrates that despite some recent improvements, the situation of many fish stocks is still critical. 
V okviru 1 je ponazorjeno, da je kljub nekaterim nedavnim izboljšanjem stanje številnih ribjih staležev še vedno kritično.
12 Consultationonfishing opportunities for 2011 (COM(2010) 241 final of 17 May 2010). 
12 Posvetovanjeoribolovnih možnostih za leto 2011, COM(2010) 241 konč., 17.5.2010.
2005 26 2010 22 32 28 Excess of total allowable catches (TACs) over levels needed to sustain catches (i.e. TACs set by Council at levels higher than recommended by official scientific advice) 59 % 34 % Stocks subject to advice to stop fishing 12 14 Stocks where no scientific advice is available 39 42 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
11 OKVIR 1 Prelovljeni staleži 2005 2010 Staleži zunaj varnih bioloških meja 26 22 32 28 Presežen celotni dovoljeni ulov (TAC) nad ravnmi, potrebnimi za trajnostni ulov (tj. TAC, ki jih Svet določi nad ravnmi, ki jih uradno priporoča stroka) 59 % 34 % Staleži, za katere se priporoča prenehanje ribolova 12 14 Staleži, za katere ni na voljo nobeno mnenje stroke 39 42 PRIPOROČILA MEDNARODNEGA SVETA ZA RAZISKOVANJE MORJA (ICES) O RIBJIH STALEŽIH V SEVEROVZHODNEM ATLANTIKU13 13 PopodatkihEurostatauloviiztegaobmočjapredstavljajovečkot70%vsegaulovaribolovnihflotEU. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
The Commission’s policy is to achieve fishing at ‘maximum sustainable yield’ (see Glossary) levels by 2015 and it has instructed ICES to provide scientific advice on that basis. 
Komisija želi s svojo politiko do leta 2015 doseči ribolov v skladu z „največjim trajnostnim donosom“ (glej Glosar) in je ICES naročila, da na podlagi tega pripravi znanstvena priporočila.
Since 1995, there is a declining trend for EU fish catches (re-duction14 from over 7 million tonnes to 5 million tonnes in 2009). 
Ulov rib na ravni EU od leta 1995 upada (zmanjšanje14 z več kot 7 milijonov ton na 5 milijonov ton leta 2009).
According to the Commission’s April 2009 Green Paper this decline is largely due to overfishing and forms part of a vicious circle involving fishing overcapacity and low economic performance of the fishing fleets. 
V skladu z Zeleno knjigo Komisije iz leta 2009 je ta upad v veliki meri posledica prelova in je del začaranega kroga med presežno ribolovno zmogljivostjo in nizko gospodarsko smotrnostjo poslovanja ribolovnih flot.
Figure 1 underlines a constant trend of declining EU fish catches which threatens the sustainability of the fishing sector. 
V diagramu 1 je prikazan stalen trend upadanja ulova rib na ravni EU, ki ogroža trajnost ribiškega sektorja.
14 Source: Eurostat. 
14 Vir: Eurostat.
12 FIGURE 1 DECLINING EU FISH CATCHES 7 500 000 7 000 000 6 500 000 6 000 000 5500000 5 000 000 4 500 000 4 000 000 3 500 000 3 000 000 EU12 EU15 EU25 EU27 EU fish catches 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: Eurostat database ‘catches: total all fishing areas’. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? Tonnes 
12 DIAGRAM 1 UPAD ULOVA RIB NA RAVNI EU 7 500 000 7 000 000 6 500 000 6 000 000 5500000 5 000 000 4 500 000 4 000 000 3 500 000 3 000 000 Ulovi rib na ravni EU EU12 EU15 EU25 EU27 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Vir: Podatkovna zbirka Eurostat„ulov: skupaj na vseh ribolovnih območjih“. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
13 EU EFFORTS TO REDUCE FISHING OVERCAPACITY 9. 
13 PRIZADEVANJA EU ZA ZMANJŠANJE PRESEŽNE RIBOLOVNE ZMOGLJIVOSTI 9.
The CFP defines15 fishing capacity in terms of vessel tonnage (gross tonnage (GT)) and power (kilowatts (kW)). 
SRP opredeljuje15 ribolovno zmogljivost z vidika tonaže (bruto tonaža (BT)) in moči (v kilovatih (kW)) plovila.
A combination of factors including declining resources, fuel price shocks, improvements in technology, the use of decommissioning aid and business mergers and closures is reducing the size of the fishing fleets each year16. 
Zaradi kombinacije dejavnikov, med katerimi so upadajoči viri, cenovni skoki goriva, boljša tehnologija, uporaba pomoči za umik iz obratovanja ter združevanja in zapiranja podjetij, so ribolovne flote vsako leto manjše16.
Figure 2 shows the extent of the decline since 1992. 
V diagramu 2 je prikazan obseg zmanjšanja od leta 1992.
15 Article3(n)ofCouncil Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002. 16 Butseeparagraph21. 
15 Člen3(n)UredbeSveta(ES) št. 2371/2002.
FIGURE 2 2 400 000 2 200 000 2 000 000 1800000 1 600 000 1 400 000 1 200 000 1 000 000 DECLINING EU FISHING FLEETS Trend in EU fishing fleet tonnage (GT) EU12 EU15 EU25 EU27 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: Annual reports by the Commission on efforts to balance capacity with fishing opportunities. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
DIAGRAM 2 ZMANJŠANJE RIBOLOVNIH FLOT EU 2 400 000 2 200 000 2 000 000 1800000 1 600 000 1 400 000 1 200 000 1 000 000 EU12 EU15 EU25 EU27 Gibanje tonaže ribolovne flote EU (BT) 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Vir: Letna poročila Komisije o prizadevanjih za doseganje ravnovesja med zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
From the start of the CFP in 1983 until 2002, fishing capacity was restricted by a system of multiannual guidance programmes (MAGPs), with specific targets for the reduction of fishing capacity. 
Od začetka izvajanja SRP leta 1983 do leta 2002 je ribolovno zmogljivost omejeval sistem večletnih usmerjevalnih programov (VLUP) s specifičnimi cilji za zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti.
The Commission concluded17 in 2002 that MAGPs failed to halt effective increases in fishing capacity. 
Komisija je leta 2002 prišla do zaključka17, da VLUP niso uspeli ustaviti dejanskih povečanj ribolovne zmogljivosti.
MAGPs were discontinued in the reformed CFP in 2002. 
VLUP se od reforme SRP leta 2002 ne uporabljajo več.
Since then, Member States are responsible for putting in place measures to adjust the fishing capacity of their fleets in order to achieve a stable and enduring balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities18, respecting an overall maximum fleet capacity reference level and for operating a strict ‘entry–exit’ regime whereby the entry of new vessels to the fishing fleet must be compensated by the withdrawal of existing vessels of equivalent tonnage and power. 
Od takrat so države članice odgovorne za uvedbo ukrepov za prilagajanje ribolovne zmogljivosti svojih flot zaradi doseganja trdnega in trajnega ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi18, spoštovanje referenčne ravni največje dovoljene zmogljivosti flote in za upravljanje strogega režima vstopov/izstopov, pri čemer mora biti vstop novih plovil v ribolovno floto izravnan z izstopi obstoječih plovil z enakovredno tonažo in močjo.
Furthermore, Member States’ capacity ceilings are reduced by any capacity removed from the fleet with public aid. 
Poleg tega se največje dovoljene zgornje meje držav članic zmanjšajo za vsako zmogljivost, umaknjeno iz flote z javno pomočjo.
Member States report annually on their efforts to balance capacity with fishing opportunities to the Commission, which in turn submits a report to the European Parliament and the Council, in addition to a more general report on the implementation of the EFF in the preceding year. 
Države članice vsako leto poročajo o svojih prizadevanjih za doseganje ravnovesja med zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi Komisiji, ki nato predloži poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, poleg bolj splošnega poročila o izvrševanju ESR v prejšnjem letu.
The EFF19 provides 4,3 billion euro for the programming period 2007–13 in support of the CFP. 
Evropski sklad za ribištvo19 zagotavlja 4,3 milijarde EUR za podporo SRP v programskem obdobju 2007–2013.
Measures funded by the EFF are set out in operational programmes, which are prepared by Member States and approved by the Commission. 
Ukrepi, ki jih financira ESR, so določeni v operativnih programih, ki jih pripravijo države članice in odobri Komisija.
Funding available includes 1,2 billion euro to adapt fishing fleets, which includes co-financing vessel decommissioning schemes provided that Member States prepare fishing effort adjustment plans (FEAPs). 
Razpoložljiva sredstva zajemajo 1,2 milijarde EUR za prilagajanje ribolovnih flot, kar vključuje sofinanciranje shem za umik plovil iz obratovanja, pod pogojem, da države članice pripravijo načrte za prilagajanje ribolovnega napora (FEAP).
The FEAPs provide the justification for scrapping specific types of fishing vessels. 
FEAP vsebujejo utemeljitve za dajanje določenih vrst plovil v razrez.
The Commission had as a mid-term EFF target to reduce the capacity of the fishing fleets by 7 % (140 000 GT) in terms of GT by 2010. 
Komisija je za ESR določila cilj, da bo do sredine obdobja zmanjšal zmogljivost ribolovnih flot za 7 % (140 000 BT) z vidika BT do leta 2010.
The Annex gives summary information on implementation of the EFF as at the end of 2010. 
V Prilogi so povzete informacije o izvrševanju ESR do konca leta 2010.
The EFF also contributes to financing investments on board fishing vessels provided that the ability of the vessels to catch fish is not increased. 
ESR prispeva tudi k financiranju naložb v ribiška plovila, pod pogojem, da se dejanska ribolovna zmožnost plovil ne poveča.
The significant increases in fuel prices in early 2008 led to Council Regulation (EC) No 744/200820, which provided temporary measures up to 31 December 2010, to promote restructuring by Member States of their fishing fleets. 
Veliko zvišanje cen goriva na začetku leta 2008 je privedlo do Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 744/200820, s katero so bili sprejeti začasni ukrepi, in sicer do 31. decembra 2010, za spodbujanje držav članic k prestrukturiranju njihovih ribolovnih flot.
17 Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the intermediate results of the multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleets at 30 June 2002 (COM(2002) 483 final of 3 September 2002). 
17 Poročilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o vmesnih rezultatih VLUP za ribolovno floto na dan 30. junija 2002, COM(2002) 483 konč. z dne 3.9.2002.
18 Chapter III of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002. 
18 Poglavje III Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002.
19 Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 of 27 July 2006 on the European Fisheries Fund (OJ L 223, 15.8.2006, p. 1). 
1198/2006 z dne 27. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za ribištvo (UL L 223, 15.8.2006, str. 1).
20 Council Regulation (EC) No 744/2008 of 24 July 2008 instituting a temporary specific action aiming to promote the restructuring of the European Community fishing fleets affected by the economic crisis (OJ L 202, 31.7.2008, p. 1). 
744/2008 z dne 24. julija 2008 o uvedbi začasnega posebnega ukrepa za spodbujanje prestrukturiranja ribiških flot Evropske skupnosti, ki jih je prizadela gospodarska kriza (UL L 202, 31.7.2008, str. 1).
14 Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 15 AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH 14. 
12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim? 15 OBSEG REVIZIJE IN PRISTOP 14.
The objective of the audit was to examine whether EU measures effectively contributed to adapting the capacity of the fleets to available fishing opportunities. 
Cilj revizije je bil preučiti, ali so ukrepi EU uspešno prispevali k prilagajanju zmogljivosti flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim.
The Court examined the following questions: (a) Is the framework for the reduction of fleet capacity clear? (b)Are specific measures well defined and implemented? 
Sodišče je preučilo naslednji vprašanji: (a) Ali je okvir za zmanjšanje zmogljivosti flot jasen? (b) Ali so posebni ukrepi dobro opredeljeni in izvajani?
The audit was carried out at the Commission and in seven Member States (Denmark, Spain, France, Italy, Poland, Portugal and the United Kingdom21) selected on the basis of the size of their fishing fleets and the resources available for adapting their fishing fleets under the EFF. 
Revizija je bila opravljena na Komisiji in v sedmih državah članicah (Danska, Španija, Francija, Italija, Poljska, Portugalska in Združeno kraljestvo21), izbranih na podlagi velikosti njihovih ribolovnih flot in sredstev ESR, ki so bila na voljo za prilagoditev njihovih ribolovnih flot.
The audit work was performed between May 2010 and November 2010. 
Revizijsko delo je bilo opravljeno med majem in novembrom 2010.
The audit examined: (a) the Commission’s procedures for approving Member States’ operational programmes (OPs) and for supervising their subsequent implementation; (b) Member States’ design and implementation of fishing effort adjustment plans, fishing vessel decommissioning schemes, modernisation schemes and compliance with fishing fleet capacity restrictions. 
Med revizijo so bili preučeni: (a) postopki Komisije za odobritev operativnih programov (OP) držav članic in za nadziranje njihovega poznejšega izvajanja; (b) zasnova in izvajanje načrtov za prilagajanje ribolovnega napora v državah članicah, njihove sheme za umik plovil iz obratovanja, sheme za posodobitve in upoštevanje omejitev zmogljivosti njihovih ribolovnih flot.
This involved examining 126 projects which received 33,4 million euro financing by the EFF for scrapping and modernising fishing vessels between 2008 and the time of the audit; (c) Member States’ procedures to implement capacity restrictions including the examination of 70 transactions on the EU fishing fleet register and Member States’ annual reports on their efforts to balance fishing capacity with fishing opportunities. 
Pri tem je bilo preučenih 126 projektov, ki so prejeli 33,4 milijona EUR sredstev iz ESR za dajanje plovil v razrez in posodobitev ribiških plovil med letom 2008 in časom revizije; (c) postopki držav članic za izvajanje omejitev zmogljivosti, vključno s preučitvijo 70 transakcij iz registra ribolovne flote EU in letna poročila držav članic o njihovih prizadevanjih za doseganje ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi.
The criteria used by the Court to assess the management of the policy by the Commission and the Member States were based on the requirements of the basic CFP regulation. 
Merila, po katerih je Sodišče ocenjevalo, kako so Komisija in države članice upravljale politiko, so temeljila na zahtevah iz temeljne uredbe o SRP.
The Court also made use of criteria set out in relevant reports22 of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 
Sodišče je uporabilo tudi merila, navedena v zadevnih poročilih22 Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD).
In addition the Court considered practices in Norway23. 
Poleg tega je upoštevalo tudi prakso na Norveškem23.
21 The audit covered implementation in England and Scotland. 
21 Revizija je zajela izvajanje v Angliji in na Škotskem.
22 Forexample,Reducingfishing capacity — Best practices for decommissioning schemes, OECD, 2009. 
22 Na primer,„Reducing Fishing Capacity: Best practices for Decommissioning Schemes“. OECD, 2009.
23 Norwaywasselectedasthe EU and Norway share some fish stocks, and Norway alone catches around half as much fish as the entire EU fleet. Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 
23 Norveška je bila izbrana zato, ker si z EU deli nekatere ribje staleže in sama ulovi približno pol toliko rib kot celotna flota EU. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?
16 OBSERVATIONS 19. 
16 OPAŽANJA 19.
Despite the reduction in capacity of the fleets in terms of GT and kW and the efforts made to date to reduce fishing overcapacity, the Commission regards the remaining fishing fleet as still too big in terms of available fish resources. 
Komisija kljub zmanjšanju zmogljivosti flot z vidika BT in kW ter dosedanjim prizadevanjem za zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti meni, da je preostala ribolovna flota še vedno prevelika glede na razpoložljive ribolovne vire.
Member States’ fishing fleets can catch significantly higher quantities of fish than are consistent with keeping fish stocks at sustainable levels. 
Ribolovne flote držav članic lahko ulovijo bistveno večje količine rib, kot je skladno z ohranjanjem ribjih staležev na trajnostni ravni.
As a result: (a) fishers have the opportunity to catch more than their allocated quotas or rights with an increased risk of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing24, and/or (b) fishers cannot make full use of their expensive fishing vessels; (c) this creates pressure on the Council, which often sets annual TAC quotas at levels which are above those proposed by the Commission, or recommended by scientific advice (see Box 1); (d)monitoring and controlling the complicated rules for quotas and effort restrictions is made more difficult. 
Zato: (a) imajo ribiči možnost uloviti več, kot znaša njihova dodeljena kvota ali pravice, kar povečuje tveganje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega (IUU) ribolova24, in/ali (b) ribiči ne morejo popolnoma izkoristiti svojih dragih ribiških plovil; (c) to povzroča pritisk na Svet, ki pogosto določi letne kvote TAC na ravneh, ki presegajo ravni, ki jih je predlagala Komisija ali jih priporoča stroka (glej okvir 1); (d) je oteženo spremljanje in nadziranje zapletenih pravil za kvote in omejitve ribolovnega napora.
Problems with the framework of key definitions, limits and concepts relating to measures to bring fishing capacity into line with available fishing opportunities are set out in paragraphs 21 to 33. 
Težave z okvirom ključnih opredelitev, omejitev in konceptov, ki se nanašajo na ukrepe za usklajevanje ribolovne zmogljivosti z razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi možnostmi, so navedene v odstavkih od 21 do 33.
These compound problems with the design and implementation of specific measures as set out in paragraphs 34 to 73. 
Težave z zasnovo in izvajanjem posebnih ukrepov so navedene v odstavkih od 34 do 73.
24 IUU fishing activities are estimated to represent 19 % of worldwide catches, or 10 billion euro and constitute a serious threat to sustainable fisheries. 
24 Po ocenah ribolovne dejavnosti IUU predstavljajo 19 % svetovnega ulova oziroma 10 milijard EUR in pomenijo resno grožnjo trajnostnemu ribolovu.
The IUU regulation to combat IUU fishing came into force in 2010: Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (OJ L 286, 29.10.2008, p. 
Uredba o IUU za boj proti ribolovu IUU je začela veljati leta 2010: Uredba Sveta (ES) 1005/2008 z dne 29. septembra 2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje (UL L 286, 29.10.2008, str.
Special Report No 12/2011 – Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? 17 INADEQUATE DEFINITION OF FISHING CAPACITY 21. 
12/2011 – Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim? 17 NEUSTREZNA OPREDELITEV RIBOLOVNE ZMOGLJIVOSTI 21.
Fishing capacity as defined by GT and kW is a key concept used to monitor the size of Member States’ fishing fleets, and implement fishing effort controls and measures to adapt fishing fleets to fishing opportunities. 
Ribolovna zmogljivost v BT in kW je ključen koncept, ki se uporablja za spremljanje velikosti ribolovnih flot držav članic ter izvajanje nadzora nad ribolovnim naporom in ukrepi za prilagajanje ribolovnih flot ribolovnim možnostim.
The relative simplicity of the fishing capacity definition facilitates its use for these purposes. 
Relativna preprostost opredelitve ribolovne zmogljivosti lajša njeno uporabo za te namene.
However, in order to match fleet capacity with fishing opportunities, the real ability of the fleets to catch fish is more important than formal measures of capacity. ‘GT and kW’ are not reliable indicators of the ability of vessels to catch fish, especially considering the advances in fishing technology. 
Vendar je za uskladitev zmogljivosti flote z ribolovnimi možnostmi dejanska ribolovna zmožnost flot pomembnejša od formalnega merjenja zmogljivosti. „BT in kW“ nista zanesljiva kazalnika dejanske ribolovne zmožnosti plovil, zlasti glede na napredek ribolovne tehnologije.
Such advances were estimated by the Commission, in its mid-term review of the CFP of 2008, to increase the ability of fishing vessels to catch fish by around 3 % per year. 
Komisija je pri svojem vmesnem pregledu SRP leta 2008 ocenila, da ta napredek povečuje dejansko ribolovno zmožnost ribiških plovil za okoli 3 % na leto.
This was estimated by the Court to result in an overall increase of 60 % over the 16-year period 1992 to 2008. 
Sodišče je ocenilo, da to pomeni skupno povečanje v višini 60 % v 16-letnem obdobju od leta 1992 do 2008.