natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This represents a substantial increase compared with the rate of 24 % already achieved. 
To pomeni bistveno več od dosežene 24-odstotne stopnje.
Figure 10 shows an example of the path that the climate allocations under Horizon 2020 will have to take if the 35 % target is to be met. 
Na sliki 10 je prikazano, kako bo treba dodeljevati sredstva za podnebne ukrepe v okviru programa Obzorje 2020, da bi bil dosežen cilj 35 %.
40 According to the Commission, data on climate-related expenditure does not yet take into account some of the financial instruments which are tracked at project level, i.e. in a bottom-up manner (InnovFin SMEG and InnovFin SME VC) due to the biennial nature of the European Investment Fund’s reporting. 
40 Po navedbah Komisije nekateri finančni instrumenti, ki se spremljajo na ravni projektov, tj. na način od spodaj navzgor (InnovFin SMEG in InnovFin SME VC), v podatkih o odhodkih za podnebne cilje še niso upoštevani, ker Evropski investicijski sklad o tem poroča vsaki dve leti.
41 Council Decision 2013/743/EU of 3 December 2013 establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon 2020 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
41 V Sklepu Sveta 2013/743/EU z dne 3. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa za izvajanje programa Obzorje 2020 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str.
965) states that the multiannual work programmes for Horizon 2020 must provide an indication of the amount of climate-related expenditure, where appropriate. 
965) je navedeno, da mora biti v večletnih programih dela za Obzorje 2020 naveden znesek odhodkov za podnebne cilje, če je to ustrezno.
42 Programmable actions have a clear thematic objective corresponding to one of the topics defined in the Commission’s work programme. 
42 Programski ukrepi imajo jasen tematski cilj, ki ustreza eni od tem, opredeljenih v programu dela Komisije.
For bottom-up actions, thematic objectives are not predetermined and can vary depending on the project. 
Za ukrepe od spodaj navzgor tematski cilji niso predhodno določeni in se lahko razlikujejo med projekti.
43 Which share of bottom-up actions can be considered climate-related depends upon researcher proposals, which are evaluated for their scientific excellence. 
43 Za kolikšen delež ukrepov od spodaj navzgor je mogoče šteti, da so povezani s podnebnimi cilji, je odvisno od predlogov raziskovalca, ki se ocenjujejo glede na znanstveno odličnost.
44 Data source is Draft budget for the year 2017, Heading 1A: Competitiveness for growth and jobs, section 3.2.2 Contribution to mainstreaming of climate action. 
44 Vir podatkov je predlog proračuna za leto 2017, razdelek 1A: Konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje, oddelek 3.2.2 Prispevek k vključevanju podnebnih ukrepov.
The calculation is based on the fact that in 2015-2017 (as in 2014) bottom-up actions accounted for 35 % of the total budget and that in that period (as in 2014) 8.5 % of the budget for bottom-up actions was climate-related. 
Izračun temelji na temu, da so ukrepi od spodaj navzgor v obdobju 2015–2017 (enako kot v letu 2014) pomenili 35 % celotnega proračuna in da je bilo v tem obdobju (in letu 2014) 8,5 % proračuna za ukrepe od spodaj navzgor namenjenih podnebnim ciljem.
Observations 37 An example of a path for climate allocation if the 35 % target for Horizon 2020 is to be met (in billion euro) 14 12 10 9.4 13.2 12.2 9.0 78% 9.5 11.0 10.0 75% 75% 77% 53% 53% 53% 47% 47% 47% 22% 25% 25% 23% 8 6 4 2 0 Non climate action Climate action 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Estimations Source: Commission’s data for 2014-2017 (draft budget 2017) and European Court of Auditors’ estimates of climate action for 2018-2020. 
Opažanja 37 Primer načina dodeljevanja sredstev za podnebne ukrepe, s katerim je mogoče doseči 35-odstotni cilj programa Obzorje 2020 (v milijardah EUR) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 13,2 12,2 Podnebni ukrepi 9,0 9,5 9,4 11,0 10,0 53% 53% 75% 75% 77% 53% 78% 47% 47% 47% 22% 25% 25% 23% Nepodnebni ukrepi 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Ocene Vir: podatki Komisije za obdobje 2014–2017 (predlog proračuna za leto 2017) in ocene Evropskega računskega sodišča o podnebnih ukrepih za obdobje 2018–2020.
63 In November 2015 the Commission devised an action plan45 in order to remedy Horizon 2020’s sub-optimal progress towards its 35 % target. 
63 Komisija je novembra 2015 pripravila akcijski načrt45, da bi izboljšala neoptimalni napredek programa Obzorje 2020 pri doseganju 35-odstotnega cilja.
We analysed whether this action plan contained adequate provisions to deliver the necessary catch-up in research. 
Sodišče je analiziralo, ali ta akcijski načrt vsebuje primerne določbe, da bi na področju raziskav ustrezno nadoknadili zaostanek.
The action plan introduces some measures from the 2016-2017 work programme onwards and recognises the need to do more in the 2018-2020 work programme. 
V akcijskem načrtu so opredeljeni nekateri ukrepi za čas po programu dela za obdobje 2016–2017, navedeno pa je tudi, da je treba v programu dela za obdobje 2018–2020 narediti več.
For example, the Commission intends to introduce compulsory climate-related checks to be performed on the whole work programme prior to approval. 
Komisija namerava na primer uvesti obvezna preverjanja v zvezi s podnebnimi cilji, ki jih bo pred odobritvijo treba izvesti za celoten program dela.
In addition, climate-related considerations are to be included in the standard project proposal templates and in the award criteria. 
Poleg tega je treba vprašanja v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami vključiti v standardne predloge za prijavo projektov in merila za dodelitev.
Allocating a sufficient budget to measures that make a sizeable contribution to climate change objectives would be another means, recommended in the action plan, by which to help meet the general 35 % target. 
Dodelitev zadostnih sredstev ukrepom, ki veliko prispevajo k ciljem na področju podnebnih sprememb, je še en način, ki je priporočen v akcijskem načrtu in bi pripomogel k doseganju skupnega 35-odstotnega cilja.
45 The Strategic Research and Innovation Directors-General Group endorsed on 12 November 2015 the measures included in the Action Plan for increasing mainstreaming of climate action in Horizon 2020 and climate-related expenditure. 
45 Strateška skupina generalnih direktorjev za raziskave in inovacije je 12. novembra 2015 sprejela ukrepe iz akcijskega načrta za povečanje vključevanja podnebnih ukrepov v program Obzorje 2020 in odhodkov za podnebne cilje.
Observations 38 64 While the action plan includes useful proposals, it fails to present any quantifiable targets or models as to how the 35 % target might be met. 
Opažanja 38 64 Akcijski načrt sicer vsebuje uporabne predloge, vendar v njem ni merljivih ciljev ali modelov za doseganje 35-odstotnega cilja.
For example, the action plan does not include related calculations, nor does it provide a roadmap on how the relatively low share of climate-related expenditure in the years 2014-2017 can be compensated for in 2018-2020. 
Ne vsebuje na primer s tem povezanih izračunov niti ne zagotavlja načrta, kako bi lahko razmeroma nizek delež odhodkov za podnebne cilje v obdobju 2014–2017 nadoknadili v letih 2018–2020.
More and better-focused climate action funding in some European Structural and Investment Funds, but largely business as usual in others 65 The target to spend 20 % of the EU budget on climate action can be factored into the various policy areas through spending more on existing climate-related programmes, creating new programmes or developing features to target spending more towards climate-related objectives. 
Več bolje usmerjenega financiranja podnebnih ukrepov v nekaterih evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladih, v drugih pa se ni skoraj nič spremenilo 65 Cilj, da se 20 % proračuna EU porabi za podnebne ukrepe, je mogoče vključiti v različna področja, tako da se za obstoječe programe v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami porabi več, da se ustvarijo novi programi ali razvijejo elementi, ki porabo bolj usmerjajo k podnebnim ciljem.
A sign of ‘better focused spending’ would be funds and programmes setting requirements which are more geared towards climate-related objectives than they were in the 2007-2013 period. 
Znak bolje usmerjene porabe bi bilo to, da bi imeli skladi in programi zahteve, ki bi bile bolj usmerjene k ciljem podnebne politike, kot so bile v obdobju 2007–2013.
Overall, we were unable to determine whether and to what extent the 20 % target represents an increase in climate action spending compared to 2007-2013 (see paragraph 27). 
Na splošno Sodišče ni moglo ugotoviti, ali 20-odstotni cilj pomeni povečanje porabe za podnebne ukrepe v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007–2013 in kolikšno (glej odstavek 27).
66 We examined the European Structural and Investment Funds and the agricultural direct payments, since these areas under shared management account for around three quarters of the planned climate funding (see paragraph 19). 
66 Sodišče je preučilo evropske strukturne in investicijske sklade ter neposredna kmetijska plačila, saj ti dve področji v okviru deljenega upravljanja pomenita približno tri četrtine predvidenega financiranja za podnebne cilje (glej odstavek 19).
For these funds, we looked at whether, compared with 2007-2013, the 20 % target had added value to the fight against climate change through: — a larger allocation of EU funds to climate action — a quantitative improvement — and/or — better focused EU funding for climate action — a qualitative improvement. 
Za te sklade je preverilo, ali je 20-odstotni cilj v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007–2013 prinesel dodano vrednost za obravnavo podnebnih sprememb zaradi: – namenitve več finančnih sredstev EU za podnebne ukrepe – kvantitativnega izboljšanja – in/ali – bolj usmerjenega financiranja EU za podnebne ukrepe – kvalitativnega izboljšanja.
Observations 39 67 Since spending has just started for the 2014-2020 period, we analysed the quantitative and qualitative improvements by auditing the design of measures in the spending programmes as well as planned expenditure, and not actual expenditure at project level. 
Opažanja 39 67 Ker se je poraba za obdobje 2014–2020 šele začela, je Sodišče kvantitativno in kvalitativno izboljšanje analiziralo z revizijo zasnove ukrepov v programih za porabo sredstev ter načrtovanih odhodkov in ne dejanskih odhodkov na ravni projektov.
The examples mentioned in the section therefore primarily act as case studies to illustrate the strengths, weaknesses and good practices we noted. 
Primeri, navedeni v tem oddelku, so torej predvsem študije primera za ponazoritev ugotovljenih prednosti, slabosti in dobrih praks.
Higher climate allocations in the ERDF and CF demonstrate that better focus on climate can be achieved 68 We assessed whether the inclusion of climate action under the 2014-2020 ERDF and CF operational programmes had resulted in more funds being allocated to climate investments compared with 2007-2013. 
Višja dodeljena sredstva za podnebne ukrepe v Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijskem skladu kažejo na to, da je mogoče doseči večjo osredotočenost na podnebje 68 Sodišče je ocenilo, ali je vključitev podnebnih ukrepov v operativne programe ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada za obdobje 2014–2020 privedlo do višje dodelitve sredstev za podnebne naložbe v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007–2013.
Since climate action spending was not specifically monitored in the 2007-2013 programmes, to perform our assessment we first identified which investment categories, known as intervention fields, were comparable to the 2014-2020 climate-related categories. 
Ker se v programih za obdobje 2007–2013 poraba za podnebne ukrepe ni posebej spremljala, je za izvedbo ocene najprej ugotovilo, katere kategorije naložb, imenovane intervencijska področja, so primerljive s kategorijami podnebnih ukrepov v obdobju 2014–2020.
In a second step, we applied the 2014-2020 EU climate coefficients to the EU expenditure made in the relevant 2007-2013 investment categories. 
Potem pa je za odhodke EU v ustreznih naložbenih kategorijah iz obdobja 2007–2013 uporabilo podnebne koeficiente EU za obdobje 2014–2020.
Mainstreaming in the ERDF and CF resulting in higher climate allocations ... 
Vključevanje v ESRR in Kohezijski sklad je privedlo do višjih dodelitev za podnebne ukrepe ...
69 Compared with 2007-2013, climate-related expenditure in 2014-2020 across all ERDF and CF programmes, including the European Territorial Cooperation framework, is planned to increase by around 69 %, from 32.4 billion euros to 54.7 billion euros. 
69 Odhodki za podnebne cilje v obdobju 2014–2020 naj bi se v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007–2013 v vseh programih ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada, vključno z okvirom za evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje, v skladu z načrti povečali za približno 69 %, z 32,4 milijarde EUR na 54,7 milijarde EUR.
When viewed in terms of its proportion of total ERDF and CF financing, climate-related expenditure is set to increase from 12 % in 2007-2013 to 21 % in 2014-2020. 
Preračunano v delež skupnega financiranja ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada naj bi se odhodki za podnebne cilje povečali z 12 % v obdobju 2007–2013 na 21 % v obdobju 2014–2020.
70 As shown in Figure 11, the nature of climate-related expenditure changed between the two funding periods. 
70 Kot je prikazano na sliki 11, se je narava odhodkov za podnebne cilje med obema obdobjema financiranja spremenila.
Whereas in 2007-2013 railways and multimodal transport made the largest climate contribution, with this category accounting for 32 % of the total, in 2014-2020 energy efficiency investments come out on top, representing 34 % of the total estimate for climate action (see Box 6 for an example46). 
Medtem ko so v obdobju 2007–2013 k podnebnim ukrepom največ prispevale železnice in multimodalni prevoz, in sicer 32 % celotnega zneska, so v obdobju 2014–2020 na vrhu naložbe v energetsko učinkovitost, ki prispevajo 34 % skupne ocene porabe za podnebne ukrepe (za primer glej okvir 646).
We did not audit the performance nor the cost-effectiveness of this project. 
Sodišče ni revidiralo smotrnosti niti stroškovne učinkovitosti tega projekta.
See Special Report No 21/2012 ‘Cost-effectiveness of cohesion policy investments in energy efficiency’ on cost-effectiveness issues regarding renewable energy (http://eca. europa.eu). 
Za vprašanja stroškovne učinkovitosti naložb v energetsko učinkovitost glej Posebno poročilo št.
Observations 40 Comparison of estimated contribution of ERDF and CF to climate action by sector and years (in billion euro) Energy efficiency (100 %) Railways & multimodal transport (40 %) Adaptation to climate change (100 %) Renewable energy (100 %) Urban transport & intelligent transport systems (40 %) Other (100 %) Biodiversity, air quality and water management (40 %) Ports and inland waterways (40 %) Other (40 %) Total 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.4 6.4 4.5 5.9 3.5 5.8 0.7 4.4 4.6 3.3 1.6 1.1 0.8 1.0 6.1 18.4 32.4 10.2 8.4 ECA estimated 2007-2013 MFF 2014-2020 MFF 54.7 Source: European Court of Auditors’ estimates based on Commission data. 
Opažanja 40 Primerjava ocenjenih prispevkov ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada k podnebnim ukrepom po sektorjih in letih (v milijardah EUR) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0,4 6,4 4,5 5,9 3,5 5,8 0,7 4,4 4,6 3,3 1,6 1,1 0,8 1,0 6,1 18,4 32,4 Energetska učinkovitost (100 %) Železnice in multimodalni prevoz (40 %) Prilagajanje na podnebne spremembe (100 %) Energija iz obnovljivih virov (100 %) Mestni prevoz in inteligentni prometni sistemi (40 %) Drugo (100 %) Biotska raznovrstnost, kakovost zraka in upravljanje voda (40 %) Pristanišča in celinske plovne poti (40 %) Drugo (100 %) Skupaj 10,2 8,4 Večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 po ocenah Evropskega računskega sodišča Večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2014–2020 54,7 Vir: ocene Evropskega računskega sodišča na podlagi podatkov Komisije.
Observations 41 Example of an energy efficiency investment co-financed by the ERDF in Romania Energy efficiency projects for private and public buildings47 are planned to account for around 6 % of total EU co-financing in Romania in 2014-2020, compared with about 1 % in 2007-2013. 
Opažanja 41 Primer naložbe v energetsko učinkovitost, ki jo je v Romuniji sofinanciral ESRR Projekti energetske učinkovitosti zasebnih in javnih stavb47 naj bi po načrtih pomenili približno 6 % vsega sofinanciranja EU v Romuniji v obdobju 2014–2020, v primerjavi z 1 % v obdobju 2007–2013.
The expenditure for such projects is weighted with a 100 % climate action coefficient. 
Odhodki za takšne projekte se ponderirajo s 100-odstotnim koeficientom za podnebne ukrepe.
One example of such projects aimed at increasing the energy efficiency of residential building was funded in District 3 of Bucharest. 
En primer takega projekta, katerega cilj je povečati energetsko učinkovitost stanovanjske zgradbe, je bil financiran v okrožju 3 v Bukarešti.
The ERDF co-financing from the 2007-2013 Regional Operational Programme amounted to around 162 500 euros. 
Sofinanciranje ESRR iz regionalnega operativnega programa za obdobje 2007–2013 je znašalo približno 162 500 EUR.
The project was completed in 2015. 
Projekt je bil zaključen leta 2015.
Thermal insulation of the block of flats and renovation of the heating system resulted in a reduction of annual energy consumption from 331 kWh/m2 to 143 kWh/m2, i.e. by 57 %. 
S toplotno izolacijo stanovanjskega bloka in prenovo sistema ogrevanja se je letna poraba energije s 331 kWh/m2 zmanjšala na 143 kWh/m2, tj. za 57 %.
The CO2 emission savings are estimated to be 238 tonnes/year. 
Prihranek emisij CO2 je ocenjen na 238 ton/leto.
Block of flats before the investment Ongoing works Block of flats after the investment (next to the project site) (next to the project site) (project site) 47 Including high-efficiency co-generation and district heating. 
Stanovanjski blok pred naložbo V času gradbenih del Stanovanjski blok po naložbi (poleg kraja projekta) (poleg kraja projekta) (kraj projekta) 47 Vključno z visoko učinkovito soproizvodnjo in daljinskim ogrevanjem.
Observations 42 71 The general trend at EU level is also mirrored in all three Member States visited for the audit in the area of cohesion policy. 
Opažanja 42 71 Splošni trend na ravni EU se v vseh treh državah članicah, ki jih je Sodišče obiskalo v okviru revizije, odraža tudi na področju kohezijske politike.
Here too the climate expenditure under all ERDF and CF operational programmes is planned to increase in 2014-2020. However, we also saw significant variations between Member States in terms of their financial commitments for climate action under the EU budget (see Table 3). 
Tudi tu se bodo v obdobju 2014–2020 odhodki za podnebne ukrepe v okviru vseh operativnih programov ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada predvidoma povečali, vendar je Sodišče opazilo bistvene razlike med državami članicami v smislu njihovih finančnih zavez za podnebne ukrepe v okviru proračuna EU (glej tabelo 3).
Climate funding of ERDF and CF in 2007-2013 and in 2014-2020 Source: European Court of Auditors’ estimates based on programming documents and national reporting. ... and cases of better focus on climate do exist 72 In addition to conducting a financial assessment, we also examined whether incorporating climate action into the 2014-2020 ERDF and CF operational programmes had resulted in investment activities which are better focused on climate action. We identified qualitative improvements in certain areas. Firstly we found that management processes were taking more account of the climate issue. 
Financiranje za podnebne cilje iz ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada v obdobjih 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 Vir: ocene Evropskega računskega sodišča na podlagi programskih dokumentov in nacionalnih poročil. ... poleg tega pa obstajajo primeri boljše usmerjenosti v podnebne ukrepe 72 Sodišče je poleg izvedbe finančne ocene preučilo tudi, ali je vključitev podnebnih ukrepov v operativne programe ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada za obdobje 2014–2020 privedla do naložbenih dejavnosti, ki so bolj usmerjene v podnebne ukrepe.
Across Germany, Poland and Romania we noted qualitative improvements in how grant applications were taking climate into account, including requirements to describe the climate change impacts and risks or the project’s climate change contribution. 
V Nemčiji, na Poljskem in v Romuniji je opazilo kvalitativne izboljšave pri tem, kako se v vlogah za nepovratna sredstva upoštevajo podnebne spremembe, vključno z zahtevami po opisu vpliva na podnebne spremembe in tveganj zanje ali prispevka projekta k podnebnim spremembam.
Secondly, we found instances where changes were being made to focus on climate action (see Box 7). 
Poleg tega je Sodišče odkrilo primere uvajanja sprememb za večjo usmerjenost v podnebne ukrepe (glej okvir 7).
Member States Estimated share of climate funding in 2007-2013 Estimated amount of climate funding in 2007-2013 (billion euro) Share of climate funding in 2014-2020 Amount of climate funding in 2014-2020 (billion euro) Germany 7.0 % 1.20 27.0 % 2.90 Poland 8.0 % 5.60 15.0 % 11.60 Romania 9.0 % 2.20 19.0 % 4.30 Table 3 
Države članice Ocenjen delež financiranja za podnebne cilje 2007–2013 Ocenjen znesek financiranja za podnebne cilje 2007–2013 (v milijardah EUR) Delež financiranja za podnebne cilje 2014–2020 Znesek financiranja za podnebne cilje 2014–2020 (v milijardah EUR) Nemčija 7,0 % 1,20 27,0 % 2,90 Poljska 8,0 % 5,60 15,0 % 11,60 Romunija 9,0 % 2,20 19,0 % 4,30 Tabela 3
Observations 43 Examples of a better focus on climate change in the audited ERDF and Cohesion Fund programmes In Germany, the Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety set up a solely nationally funded project to encourage the active participation of environmental partners in the ERDF programming process and to support the incorporation of environmental and climate issues. 
Opažanja 43 Primeri boljše usmerjenosti v podnebne spremembe v revidiranih programih ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada V Nemčiji je zvezno ministrstvo za okolje, ohranjanje narave, gradnjo in jedrsko varnost pripravilo projekt, ki ga financira izključno država, da bi okoljske partnerje spodbudilo k dejavnemu sodelovanju v procesu načrtovanja programov ESRR in podprlo vključevanje okoljskih in podnebnih vprašanj.
Among other things, the project resulted in the production of two programming manuals. 
Zaradi projekta sta bila med drugim pripravljena dva priročnika za načrtovanje programov.
These included, for instance, examples of good practice for incorporating climate action into projects in different areas. 
Vključevala sta na primer primere dobre prakse za vključevanje podnebnih ukrepov v projekte na različnih področjih.
The EU climate coefficients were labelled as a first step in the right direction, while stressing that ecological sustainability had to be integrated in all measures. 
Podnebni koeficienti EU so bili označeni kot prvi korak v pravo smer, hkrati pa je bilo poudarjeno, da je treba ekološko trajnost vključiti v vse ukrepe.
Under the German Saxony operational programme, the selection criteria stipulate that company buildings must be renovated to energy efficiency standards which exceed legal requirements by 10 %. 
Izbirna merila v operativnem programu nemške dežele Saške določajo, da je treba poslovne stavbe prenavljati po standardih energetske učinkovitosti, ki za 10 % presegajo zakonske zahteve.
Furthermore, in energy-efficiency renovations, funding is targeted at only those parts of a project which bring added climate value, whereas previously whole projects were supported. 
Poleg tega je financiranje pri prenovah za večjo energetsko učinkovitost usmerjeno samo v tiste dele projekta, ki prinašajo dodano vrednost za podnebje, medtem ko je bila prej pomoč namenjena projektom v celoti.
Romania awards higher scores to projects in the Large Infrastructure Operational Programme providing higher savings in energy consumption. 
Romunija v operativnem programu za velike infrastrukturne projekte dodeljuje višje ocene projektom, ki zagotavljajo večji prihranek pri porabi energije.