natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is planned to offer this facility to certain agencies as from the 2009 financial year, and to subsequently extend it to others. 
Načrtuje se, da bo ta funkcija nekaterim agencijam ponujena v proračunskem letu 2009 ter se nato razširila na druge.
RECOMMENDATION 4 – MANAGING COSTS The Agencies using Commission’s IT accounting system will be offered a facility for allocating the agency’s expenditure to each of its activities. 
PRIPOROČILO 4 – STROŠKI UPRAVLJANJA Agencijam, ki uporabljajo računalniški računovodski sistem Komisije, bo ponujena funkcija za dodeljevanje odhodkov agencije za vsako od njenih dejavnosti.
The extra control burden on both beneficiary and Commission of collecting information on the costs to the beneficiary of preparing proposals is not currently justified. 
Dodatno breme nadzora, naloženo upravičencu in Komisiji z zbiranjem informacij o stroških, ki jih ima upravičenec zaradi priprave predlogov, zdaj ni upravičeno.
The Commission maintains records and analysis of its programme management costs. 
Komisija vodi evidenco in izvaja analizo stroškov upravljanja programa.
5 Working documents II, III and IV to the Preliminary Draft Budget. 
5 Delovni dokumenti II, III in IV k predhodnemu predlogu proračuna.
43 ANNEX 1 Extract of the: Mid Term Evaluation of the Multi-annual Programme for Action in the Field of Energy “Intelligent Energy for Europe, 2003-2006”, ECOTEC Research & Consulting Limited, UK Programme Added Value (page 58) In the view of the evaluators an important aspect of added value that the IEE programme brings is the strength of the synergy between the fields. 
43 PRILOGA 1 Izvleček vmesnega vrednotenja večletnega akcijskega programa na področju energije: ”Inteligentna energija za Evropo 2003–2006”, ECOTEC Research & Consulting Limited, Združeno kraljestvo Dodana vrednost Po mnenju ocenjevalcev je pomemben vidik dodane vrednosti, ki jo zagotavlja program IEE, moč sinergije med področji.
This can have the effect of bringing together actors in renewables, energy efficiency and transport. 
To lahko združi udeležence na področju obnovljivih virov energije, energetske učinkovitosti in prometa.
Evaluations of predecessor programmes and our consultations have pointed out that the projects funded have inspired member state policy changes and interventions. 
Vrednotenja preteklih programov in naša posvetovanja so poudarila, da so financirani projekti spodbudili spremembe politike programa (stran 58) in ukrepanje držav članic.
It is too early to say that this will occur as a result of the projects being currently funded. 
Prezgodaj je za trditev, da bodo te spremembe nastale kot posledica projektov, ki se zdaj financirajo.
However, in the view of the evaluators as the projects are of the same nature as in the predecessor programmes it is reasonable to assume that this will occur. 
Vendar je po mnenju ocenjevalcev glede na to, da so projekti iste vrste kot v preteklih programih, smiselno domnevati, da se bo to zgodilo.
This aspect should be covered in the ex-post evaluation of the IEE programme. 
Ta vidik mora biti vključen v naknadno vrednotenje programa IEE.
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 7/2008 Intelligent Energy 2003-2006 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2008 — 43 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-050-2 DOI 10.2865/12922 
Evropsko Računsko Sodišče Posebno poročilo št. 7/2008 Inteligentna energija 2003–2006 Luxembourg: Urad za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti 2008 — 43 str. — 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978–92–9207–065–6 DOI 10.2865/16547
How to obtain EU publications Our priced publications are available from EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu), where you can place an order with the sales agent of your choice. 
Kako do publikacij EU? Publikacije Urada za publikacije, namenjene prodaji, so na voljo na spletni strani EU Bookshop http://bookshop.europa.eu, kjer jih lahko naročite pri izbrani prodajni enoti.
You can obtain their contact details by sending a fax to (352) 29 29-42758. 
Seznam prodajnih enot po vsem svetu lahko zahtevate tudi po faksu (352) 29 29-42758.
SPECIAL REPORT “INTELLIGENT ENERGY 20032006” EXAMINES, IN TURN, THE USE MADE OF EU FUNDS, THE SUCCESSES AND LIMITATION OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION, AND THE OVERHEAD COSTS FOR BOTH THE COMMISSION AND FOR PARTICIPANTS OF AN EU SCHEME AIMED AT PROMOTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND THE USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY. 
V POSEBNEM POROČILU ”INTELIGENTNA ENERGIJA 20032006” SO PREDSTAVLJENE UGOTOVITVE O TEM, KAKO SO BILA PORABLJENA SREDSTVA EU, O USPEHIH IN OMEJITVAH PRI SPREMLJANJU IN VREDNOTENJU TER O ADMINISTRATIVNIH STROŠKIH KOMISIJE IN UDELEŽENCEV V PROGRAMU EU, KATEREGA NAMEN JE SPODBUJANJE ENERGETSKE UČINKOVITOSTI IN UPORABE OBNOVLJIVIH VIROV ENERGIJE.
THE REPORT MAKES A SERIES OF RECOMMENDATIONS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE DESIGN OF SIMILAR PROGRAMMES IN THE FUTURE, MAXIMISING THE VALUE OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION, AND CONTAINING OVERHEAD COSTS. 
POROČILO VSEBUJE VRSTO PRIPOROČIL ZA IZBOLJŠANJE ZASNOVE PODOBNIH PROGRAMOV V PRIHODNOSTI, DA SE DOSEŽETA ČIM VEČJA UČINKOVITOST SPREMLJANJA IN VREDNOTENJA TER OMEJIJO ADMINISTRATIVNI STROŠKI.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS ISBN 978-92-9207-050-2 QJ-AB-08-003-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE ISBN 978-92-9207-065-6 QJ-AB-08-003-SL-C
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS EN IS CROSS COMPLIANCE AN EFFECTIVE POLICY? 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE SL ALI JE NAVZKRIŽNA SKLADNOST USPEŠNA POLITIKA?
Special Report No 8 2008 
Posebno poročilo št. 8 2008
Special Report No 8 2008 IS CROSS COMPLIANCE AN EFFECTIVE POLICY? (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 8 2008 ALI JE NAVZKRIŽNA SKLADNOST USPEŠNA POLITIKA? (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 248(4) ES) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
2 EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-45410 Fax +352 4398-46430 E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Special Report No 8 2008 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). 
2 EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg Tel.: +352 4398-45410 Faks: +352 4398-46 430 E-naslov: euraud@eca.europa.eu Spletni naslov: http://www.eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9207-117-2 DOI 10.2865/34445 © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9207-129-5 DOI 10.2865/38670 © Evropski skupnosti, 2009 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
INDEX OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CAP: Common Agricultural Policy Direct payments: Payments directly granted to farmers under an income support scheme listed in Annex I of Council Regulation (EC) No1782/2003 EU: European Union GAEC: Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition. 
GLOSAR IZRAZOV IN KRATIC SKP: skupna kmetijska politika. Neposredna plačila: plačila, ki se kmetom dodelijo neposredno v okviru ene od shem dohodkovne podpore iz Priloge I k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št.
This refers to sets of standards defined by the Member States for soil preservation and minimum land maintenance (on the basis of the framework defined in Annex IV to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003), and obligations in relation to permanent pasture Legal framework: The Council Regulation: Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 
1782/2003), ter obveznosti v zvezi s trajnimi travniki. Pravni okvir: Uredba Sveta: Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete ter o spremembi določenih uredb (UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str.1).
1) The Commission Regulation: Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 of 21 April 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of cross compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system provided for in of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 141, 30.4.2004, p. 
Uredba Komisije: Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 796/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje navzkrižne skladnosti, modulacije in integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema, predvidenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št.
18) Legislation adopted by the Member States within the provisions of the above Permanent pasture: In the context of cross compliance, permanent pasture is defined as land used to grow grasses or other herbaceous forage which has not been included in the crop rotation of a farm for five years or longer. 
18). Zakonodaja, ki so jo države članice sprejele v okviru določb teh uredb. Trajni travnik: trajni travnik pri navzkrižni skladnosti pomeni zemljišče, ki se uporablja za gojenje trav ali druge zelnate krme in pet let ali več ni zajeto v kolobarjenje kmetije.
It is one element of GAEC SMART: Specific – Measurable – Achievable – Relevant – Timed SMR: Statutory Management Requirements. 
Predstavlja enega od elementov dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev. SMART: specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, ustrezni in časovno opredeljeni cilji.
These are set out in selected articles pertaining to 19 Directives and Regulations (listed in Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003) in the areas of environment; public health, animal and plant health; and animal welfare. 
SMR: predpisane zahteve ravnanja. Predstavljene so v izbranih členih iz devetnajstih direktiv in uredb (navedenih v Prilogi III k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. Cross compliance, which is a vital element of the CAP, applies since 2005 and links most CAP payments to the respect of certain rules in the areas of environment, health and animal welfare. 
POVZETEK I. Navzkrižna skladnost, ki je bistveni sestavni del SKP, se uporablja od leta 2005 in večino plačil SKP povezuje s spoštovanjem določenih pravil na področjih okolja, zdravja in dobrega počutja živali.
Based on the results of an audit on the effectiveness of cross compliance, the Court concluded that: – the objectives and the scope of cross compliance are not well defined, making it unclear what cross compliance is designed to achieve; – the legal framework poses considerable difficulties, notably because it is too complex; – cross compliance and rural development are not well adapted to one another; – Member States did not take their responsibility to implement effective control and sanction systems. 
Sodišče je na podlagi rezultatov revizije uspešnosti navzkrižne skladnosti prišlo do naslednjih zaključkov: – cilji in obseg navzkrižne skladnosti niso dobro opredeljeni, zato ni jasno, kaj naj bi navzkrižna skladnost dosegla; – pravni okvir povzroča precejšnje težave predvsem zato, ker je preveč zapleten; – politiki navzkrižne skladnosti in razvoja podeželja nista dobro usklajeni; – države članice niso prevzele svoje odgovornosti za izvajanje uspešnih sistemov kontrole in sankcij.
As a consequence the control system provides insufficient assurance on farmer compliance; – data provided by the Member States on checks and infringements is not reliable and the Commission’s performance monitoring was found wanting. 
Posledično sistem kontrole ne daje zadostnega zagotovila o upoštevanju skladnosti s strani kmetov; – podatki, ki so jih države članice zagotovile o pregledih in kršitvah, niso zanesljivi, Komisija pa ni dovolj spremljala uspešnosti.
In the short run cross compliance can be improved by implementing the following recommendations: the Community legislator may wish to consider: – whether such elements of the rural development policy as the approval of standards by the Commission and the obligation of Member States to lay down verifiable standards should also apply to cross compliance; 
Navzkrižno skladnost bi bilo mogoče na kratki rok izboljšati z izvedbo naslednjih priporočil: Zakonodajalec Skupnosti bi moral razmisliti: – ali bi se morali tudi pri navzkrižni skladnosti uporabljati takšni sestavni deli politike razvoja podeželja, kot sta Komisijina odobritev standardov in obveznost držav članic, da določijo preverljive standarde;
If cross compliance is to achieve its potential positive effects in the long run, the policy must be improved considerably, in particular by implementing the following recommendations: the Commission should: – simplify the legal framework, in particular by organising it around the principal elements of farming activity where improvements are sought, by specifying the results that are expected and, by prioritising requirements and standards; – base the results to be achieved on needs assessments and specific studies; – assess the quality of the requirements and standards defined by the Member States; the Member States should: – be required to lay down the precise obligations deriving from the legislation, taking account of the specific characteristics of the areas and farming practices concerned where appropriate. 
Da bi lahko politika navzkrižne skladnosti dolgoročno dosegla svoje možne pozitivne učinke, jo je treba bistveno spremeniti, zlasti z izvedbo naslednjih priporočil: Komisija bi morala: – poenostaviti pravni okvir, zlasti tako, da ga organizira okoli glavnih delov kmetijske dejavnosti, kjer so potrebne izboljšave, da navede pričakovane rezultate in prednostno razvrsti zahteve in standarde; – oblikovati rezultate, ki jih je treba doseči, na ocenah potreb in specifičnih študijah; – oceniti kakovost zahtev in standardov, ki jih določijo države članice; Od držav članic bi bilo treba: – zahtevati, da natančno določijo obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz zakonodaje, in pri tem upoštevajo posebne značilnosti zadevnih območij in kmetijskih praks, kjer je ustrezno.
INTRODUCTION CROSS COMPLIANCE AND THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY 1. 
UVOD NAVZKRIŽNA SKLADNOST IN SKUPNA KMETIJSKA POLITIKA 1.
Until 2005, CAP payments were linked to agricultural production, which was seen as distorting markets and having negative consequences for the landscape and for the environment, such as water pollution due to increased use of pesticides and fertilisers and impairment of biodiversity. 
Plačila SKP so bila do leta 2005 vezana na kmetijsko proizvodnjo, kar naj bi izkrivljalo trge ter na primer negativno vplivalo na krajino in okolje z onesnaževanjem vode zaradi povečane uporabe pesticidov in gnojil ter slabšanjem biotske raznovrstnosti.
The 2003 CAP reform, which took effect in January 2005, aims to address these issues principally through severing the link between CAP payments and agricultural production (“decoupling”). 
Namen reforme SKP iz leta 2003, ki je začela veljati januarja 2005, je te težave odpraviti predvsem z odpravo povezave med plačili SKP in kmetijsko proizvodnjo (t.i. „nevezanost“ oz. v ang. „decoupling“).
The Council1 introduced cross compliance as an element of the CAP. 
Svet1 je uvedel navzkrižno skladnost kot sestavni del SKP.
Cross compliance links most CAP payments to compliance with rules relating to the environment, public, animal and plant health, and animal welfare and to maintain agricultural land (especially when it is no longer used for production purposes) in good agricultural and environmental condition. 
Navzkrižna skladnost večino plačil SKP povezuje s spoštovanjem pravil v zvezi z okoljem, javnim zdravjem, zdravjem živali in rastlin ter dobrim počutjem živali, prav tako pa z obdelovanjem kmetijskih zemljišč v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji (zlasti tista, ki se več ne uporabljajo za proizvodne namene).
These rules are set out in statutory management requirements (SMRs) and standards of good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC). 
Ta pravila so opredeljena v predpisanih zahtevah ravnanja (SMR) in standardih za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje (GAEC).
If a farmer does not respect the requirements and standards his CAP payments may be reduced or, in extreme cases, cancelled. 
Če kmet ne spoštuje zahtev in standardov, se mu lahko plačila SKP znižajo ali v izjemnih primerih ukinejo.
In addition, apart from cross compliance, he may also be sanctioned under the Directives or Regulations concerned. 
Prav tako je lahko poleg navzkrižne skladnosti sankcioniran tudi v okviru zadevnih direktiv ali uredb.
1 See Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (see index of terms and abbreviations). 
1 Glej Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 (glej glosar).
TABLE 1 Type of provision Reference to the Council Regulation Applicable from Policy area Selected articles from the following Community legislation (see Annex III of the Council Regulation for further details) SMRs Article 4 Annex III 2005 Environment Birds Directive Groundwater Directive Sewage sludge Directive Nitrates Directive Habitats Directive Public, animal and plant health Two Directives and two Regulations on the Identification and Registration of animals Directive on placing plant protection products on the market 2006 Directive on the prohibition to use certain products for stock farming Regulation on food and feed law Three Directives and one Regulation on the prevention, control and eradication of certain animal diseases 2007 Animal welfare Three Directives on the protection of animals OVERVIEW OF THE SMRs TO BE RESPECTED FOR CROSS COMPLIANCE 
TABELA 1 Vrsta določbe Sklic na Uredbo Sveta Velja od leta Področje politike Izbrani členi iz naslednje zakonodaje Skupnosti (za dodatne podrobnosti glej Prilogo III k Uredbi Sveta) SMR Člen 4 Priloga III 2005 Okolje Direktiva o pticah Direktiva o podzemni vodi Direktiva o blatu iz čistilnih naprav Direktiva o nitratih Direktiva o habitatih Javno zdravje ter zdravje živali in rastlin Dve direktivi in dve uredbi o identifikaciji in registraciji živali Direktiva o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet 2006 Direktiva o prepovedi uporabe nekaterih izdelkov v živinoreji Uredba o zakonodaji o krmi in živilih Tri direktive in ena uredba o preprečevanju, kontroli in odpravi nekaterih živalskih bolezni 2007 Dobro počutje živali Tri direktive o zaščiti živali PREGLED PREDPISANIH ZAHTEV RAVNANJA, KI MORAJO BITI UPOŠTEVANE PRI NAVZKRIŽNI SKLADNOSTI
In a previous report2, the Court recognised the importance of the principle of linking CAP payments to compliance with rules relating to the environment, public, animal and plant health, and animal welfare. 
Sodišče je v prejšnjem poročilu na to temo2 priznalo pomembnost načela, da se plačila SKP povežejo z upoštevanjem pravil v zvezi z okoljem, javnim zdravjem, zdravjem živali in rastlin ter dobrim počutjem živali.
Standards for GAEC apply in all Member States from 1 January 20053, while the introduction of SMRs into cross compliance, i.e the possibility to reduce CAP payments, is gradually being phased in. 
Standardi za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje se v vseh državah članicah uporabljajo od 1. januarja 20053, medtem ko uvajanje predpisanih zahtev ravnanja v navzkrižno skladnost, tj. možnost zmanjšanja plačil SKP, poteka postopoma.
Member States applying the single payment scheme (EU 15 plus Malta and Slovenia) are required to implement SMRs between 2005 and 2007, depending on the policy area considered (environment, health and animal welfare). 
Države članice, ki izvajajo shemo enotnega plačila (države EU-15 ter Malta in Slovenija), morajo predpisane zahteve ravnanja začeti izvajati med letoma 2005 in 2007, odvisno od posameznega področja (okolje, zdravje in dobro počutje živali).
The timetable for the implementation of SMRs in the other Member States is spread out between 2009 and 2011 for the EU 10 (minus Malta and Slovenia) and between 2012 and 2014 for Bulgaria and Romania. 
V skladu s časovnim razporedom se morajo predpisane zahteve ravnanja v državah članicah EU-10 (brez Malte in Slovenije) začeti izvajati med letoma 2009 in 2011, v Bolgariji in Romuniji pa med letoma 2012 in 2014.
Tables 1 and 2 provide an overview of the provisions to be respected for cross compliance. 
V tabelah 1 in 2 je prikazan pregled določb, ki morajo biti upoštevane pri navzkrižni skladnosti.
2 Special Report No 14/2000 on “Greening the CAP”(OJ C 353, 8.12.2000). 
2 Posebno poročilo št. 14/2000 o SKP in okolju (UL C 353, 8.12.2000).
3 They applied in Bulgaria and Romania when they became Member States in January 2007. 
3 V Bolgariji in Romuniji se uporabljajo od januarja 2007, ko sta ti državi postali članici EU.
9 TABLE 2 Type of provision Reference to the Council Regulation Applicable from Issue of Annex IV and permanent pasture Standards of Annex IV and obligation in relation to permanent pasture GAECs Article 5(1) Annex IV 2005 Soil erosion Minimum soil cover Minimum land management Retain terraces Soil organic matter Standards for crop rotation where applicable Arable stubble management Soil structure Appropriate machinery use Minimum level of maintenance Minimum livestock stocking rates Protection of permanent pasture Retention of landscape features Avoiding the encroachment of unwanted vegetation on agricultural land Maintenance of olive groves in good vegetative condition Article 5(2) 2005 Permanent pasture Land under permanent pasture at a certain date is maintained as such OVERVIEW OF THE GAECs TO BE RESPECTED FOR CROSS COMPLIANCE 
9 TABELA 2 Vrsta določbe Sklic na Uredbo Sveta Velja od leta Zadeve Priloge IV in trajni travnik Standardi Priloge IV in obveznost v zvezi s trajnim travnikom GAEC Člen 5(1) Priloga IV 2005 Erozija tal Minimalna talna odeja Minimalno upravljanje zemljišč Ohranjanje teras Organska snov v tleh Standardi za kolobar, kjer je primerno upravljanje z ornimi strnišči Struktura tal Ustrezna raba strojev Minimalna raven vzdrževanja Minimalne obremenitve živine Zaščita trajnega travnika Ohranitev krajinskih značilnosti Preprečevanje širjenja nezaželene vegetacije na kmetijskih zemljiščih Vzdrževanje oljčnih nasadov v dobrem rastlinskem stanju Člen 5(2) 2005 Trajni travnik Zemljišča, ki so se uporabljala kot trajni travniki na določen datum, ostanejo trajni travniki PREGLED DOBRIH KMETIJSKIH IN OKOLJSKIH POGOJEV, KI MORAJO BITI UPOŠTEVANI PRI NAVZKRIŽNI SKLADNOSTI
Cross compliance does not involve the outlay of budgetary funds per se. 
Navzkrižna skladnost sama po sebi ne zahteva izdatkov proračunskih sredstev.
On the contrary, 75 % of the reductions in direct aid payments are credited to the EU budget. 
Ravno nasprotno – 75 % znižanj plačil neposredne podpore se knjiži v dobro proračuna EU.
Although the amounts concerned (some 10 million euro in 2005) are limited, cross compliance applies to the implementation of a major part of the EU budget (around 40 billion euro) and to around 5 million farmers. 
Čeprav so zadevni zneski znižanj majhni (približno 10 milijonov EUR v letu 2005), se navzkrižna skladnost uporablja pri izvrševanju velikega dela proračuna EU (približno 40 milijard EUR) in za približno 5 milijonov kmetov.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CROSS COMPLIANCE 7. 
PRAVNI OKVIR IN IZVAJANJE NAVZKRIŽNE SKLADNOSTI 7.
The legal framework for the implementation of cross compliance results from the combination of four types of pronouncements: (a) the SMRs and the GAECs annexed to the Council Regulation; (b) the Commission Regulation (see index of terms and abbreviations) on the implementation of the Council Regulation; (c) further guidance documents issued by the Commission for the Member States; and (d) national legislation adjusting general obligations to the domestic context of each Member State. 
Pravni okvir za izvajanje navzkrižne skladnosti je nastal na podlagi kombinacije naslednjih štirih vrst dokumentov: (a) predpisanih zahtev ravnanja in dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev, priloženih k Uredbi Sveta; (b) Uredbe Komisije (glej glosar) o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta; (c) dodatnih smernic Komisije za države članice; in (d) nacionalne zakonodaje, ki splošne obveznosti prilagaja notranjim razmeram posamezne države članice.