natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
10 Thestrategicenvironmental assessment forms part of the ex ante evaluation (see footnote 11) and addresses the requirements of the environmental assessment provided for in Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 
10 Strateškaokoljska presoja je del predhodne ocene (glej opombo 11) in obravnava zahteve v zvezi z okoljsko oceno iz Direktive 2001/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 197, 21.7.2001, str.
30) (the ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive’). 
30) (Strateška direktiva o presoji vplivov na okolje).
11 The ex ante evaluation is part of the procedure for drawing up a rural development programme; its aim is to optimise the allocation of budgetary resources and improve programming quality. Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
11 Predhodna ocena je del postopka priprave programa razvoja podeželja, namenjena optimizaciji dodeljevanja proračunskih virov in izboljšanju kakovosti priprave programov. Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
Nevertheless, good examples of specific and measurable objectives were also identified. 
Vendar pa so bili najdeni tudi dobri primeri specifičnih in merljivih ciljev.
In Sweden, agri-environment objectives are embedded in a set of national environmental quality objectives which were adopted by the Swedish Parliament in 1999. 
Na Švedskem so kmetijsko-okoljski cilji vključeni v sklop nacionalnih ciljev kakovosti okolja, ki jih je leta 1999 sprejel švedski parlament.
The time horizon for these objectives is 2020, but interim targets relating to the situation in 2010 have been set for most of the objectives. 
Veljajo za obdobje do leta 2020, za večino ciljev pa so bile sprejete vmesne ciljne vrednosti za stanje leta 2010.
The best examples were found to be so-called ‘outcome-ori-ented’ sub-measures, the implementation of which leads to results that are directly observable on the ground. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so najboljši primeri tako imenovani „izhodno usmerjeni“ podukrepi, katerih izvajanje prinaša rezultate, ki jih je mogoče opazovati neposredno na terenu.
In Andalusia, Piedmont and France, these sub-measures concerned the protection of breeds in danger of being lost to farming (see Picture 2). 
V Andaluziji, Piemontu in Franciji se ti podukrepi nanašajo na pasme, ki jim grozi opuščanje reje (glej fotografijo 2).
The sub-measures in the Rhineland-Palatinate and France, which were audited in the context of best practices, concerned grassland management (see Box 3). 
Po-dukrepi v Porenju - Pfalzu in Franciji, revidirani kot primeri najboljših praks, pa so se nanašali na upravljanje travinja (glej okvir 3).
Picture 2: Example of agri-environment in France: protecting a breed of horses (‘Ardennais’) in danger of being lost to farming. © European Union, source: European Court of Auditors. 
Fotografija 2: Primer kmetijsko-okoljskega podukrepa v Franciji – zaščita konjske pasme („ardenci“), ki ji grozi opuščanje reje. © Evropska unija. Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
19 Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 20 THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURES CITED DO NOT PROVIDE A CLEAR JUSTIFICATION OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENT PAYMENTS environmentAl pressures Are identified in the rurAl development progrAmmes 28. 
7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana? 20 NAŠTETI PRITISKI NA OKOLJE NISO JASNA UTEMELJITEV ZA KMETIJSKO-OKOLJSKA PLAČILA pritisKi na oKolje so opredeljeni v programih razvoja podeželja 28.
All the rural development programmes audited identified the existing environmental pressures. 
V vseh revidiranih programih razvoja podeželja so opredeljeni obstoječi pritiski na okolje.
These concerned, in particular, the loss of biodiversity, threats to water quality, soil erosion, air pollution and climate change. 
Ti se nanašajo zlasti na izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti, ogrožanje kakovosti vode, erozijo tal, onesnaževanje zraka in podnebne spremembe.
Identification of these pressures was largely based on the Community strategic guidelines in which the Council sets out the EU’s priorities for the 2007–13 rural development programming period. 
Opredelitev teh pritiskov je v glavnem temeljila na strateških smernicah Skupnosti, v katerih je Svet določil prioritete EU za programsko obdobje za razvoj podeželja 2007–2013.
Maps locating the identified environmental pressures are included in seven out of the eight rural development programmes audited. 
Karte, ki prikazujejo ugotovljene pritiske na okolje, so vključene v sedem od osmih revidiranih programov razvoja podeželja.
Member States could generally provide documents supporting their analysis of environmental pressures (e.g. by data and studies). 
Države članice so običajno lahko zagotovile dokumente, ki so utemeljevali njihove analize pritiskov na okolje (npr. s podatki in študijami).
As an illustration, the Piedmont rural development programme includes various maps showing existing soil threats (decrease in organic matter, compaction and contamination of soils, etc). 
V ponazoritev navajamo program razvoja podeželja za Piemont, ki vključuje različne karte s prikazom obstoječe ogroženosti tal (zmanjšanje vsebnosti organske snovi, zbitost in kontaminacija tal itd.).
The managing authority was also able to provide data classifying each of the 1 206 municipalities in the region (and specific parts of them) according to the risk of soil erosion, broken down into three classes (less than 3 tonnes per hectare and per year, between 3 and 15 tonnes, and more than 15 tonnes). 
Poleg tega je organ upravljanja lahko zagotovil podatke, na podlagi katerih je bilo vseh 1 206 občin v regiji (in njihovi posamezni deli) razvrščenih glede na nevarnost erozije tal v tri razrede (manj kot 3 tone na hektar letno, od 3 ton do 15 ton ter več kot 15 ton).
However, in a number of programmes audited, the environmental issues were described in a general manner without providing a clear link with the agri-environment sub-measures. 
Vendar pa so bila okoljska vprašanja v več revidiranih programih opisana na splošno in ni bilo jasne povezave s kmetijsko-okoljskimi podukrepi.
For example, in Spain, Italy and France, some of the environmental pressures identified in the rural development programmes were not addressed by agri-environment payments. 
Na primer, v Španiji, Italiji in Franciji za nekatere pritiske na okolje, opredeljene v programih razvoja podeželja, kmetijsko okoljska plačila niso bila zagotovljena.
Such cases were not explained in the programmes. Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
Ti primeri v programih niso bili pojasnjeni. Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
21 Links between the environment and farming practices are numerous and difficuLt to estabLish with precision 31. 
21 povezave med oKoljem in načini Kmetovanja so številne in jih je težKo natančno določiti 31.
An assessment of the extent to which agri-environment objectives have been achieved depends on the existence of a link between the agri-environment sub-measures and the environmental pressures. 
Ocena tega, v kolikšni meri so bili doseženi kmetijsko-okoljski cilji, je odvisna od tega, ali obstaja povezava med kmetijsko-okoljskimi podukrepi in pritiski na okolje.
Agri-environment sub-measures may have a positive effect on several environmental pressures (water, soil, air, biodiversity, etc). 
Kmetijsko-okoljski podukrepi lahko ugodno vplivajo na različne pritiske na okolje (voda, tla, zrak, biotska raznovrstnost itd.).
Environmental pressures cannot be clearly prioritized or ranked as they concern elements which are all relevant, different in nature, and not comparable. 
Ker se pritiski na okolje nanašajo na elemente, od katerih so vsi pomembni, različne narave in niso primerljivi, ni mogoče nedvomno določiti njihovega prednostnega vrstnega reda ali jih razvrstiti.
As a consequence, the rural development programmes audited provide no or only limited information on the relative importance of the environmental pressures identified. 
Zato revidirani programi razvoja podeželja ne dajejo nobenih informacij ali pa le skope informacije o relativni pomembnosti ugotovljenih pritiskov na okolje.
In addition, they do not identify precise links to agri-environmental sub-measures proposed. 
Poleg tega ne opredeljujejo natančnih povezav s predlaganimi kmetijsko-okoljskimi podukrepi.
This makes it difficult to assess to what extent the sub-measures have had an influence on the specific environmental pressure identified. 
Zaradi tega je težko oceniti, koliko so podukrepi vplivali na posamezne ugotovljene pritiske na okolje.
Therefore, most Member States assess the achievement of the agri-environment objectives globally, considering all sub-measures together. 
Države članice zato doseganje kmetijsko-okoljskih ciljev ocenjujejo na splošno, za vse podukrepe skupaj.
The rural development programmes thus state that there are multiple relationships between the environmental pressures and the farming practices supported under agri-environment. 
Programi razvoja podeželja tako navajajo, da obstajajo številne povezave med pritiski na okolje in načini kmetovanja, ki jih podpirajo kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi.
To address this, in two out of eight programmes audited the links between environmental pressures and agri-environment sub-measures could be classified as direct or indirect. 
Tega bi se lahko lotili tako, da bi pri dveh od osmih revidiranih programov povezave med pritiski na okolje in kmetijsko-okoljskimi podukrepi označili kot neposredne ali posredne.
For instance, in Piedmont, one of the agri-environment sub-measures audited (support for integrated production, see glossary) was expected to contribute to four out of the five environmental objectives 12, but only one was selected as a direct and principal objective (protection of water quality). 
V Piemontu, na primer, se je za enega od revidiranih kmetijsko-okoljskih podukrepov (podpora za integrirano pridelavo, glej glosar) pričakovalo, da bo prispeval k štirim od petih okoljskih ciljev12, vendar je bil le eden izbran kot neposreden in glavni cilj (varstvo kakovosti vode).
This helps clarifying the contribution of the agri-environment payments towards the environmental objectives set out in the framework. 
To pomaga razjasniti prispevek kmetijsko-okoljskih plačil k doseganju okoljskih ciljev, opredeljenih v okviru.
Another example of a direct link between an agri-environment sub-measure and the pressures identified was in Poland. 
Drug primer neposredne povezave med kmetijsko-okoljskim podukrepom in pritiski na okolje je bil najden na Poljskem.
According to the Polish rural development programme, wind erosion is a threat for 28 % of the territory. 
Glede na poljski program razvoja podeželja vetrna erozija ogroža 28 % ozemlja.
Introducing a soil cover during the winter is a farming practice which limits soil erosion caused, inter alia, by the wind. 
Uporaba talne odeje pozimi je način kmetovanja, s katerim se omeji erozija tal, ki jo med drugim povzroča veter.
This practice is supported by agri-environment payments included in the Polish rural development programme, as illustrated in Picture 3. 
Ta način podpirajo kmetijsko-okoljska plačila, vključena v poljski program razvoja podeželja, kot kaže fotografija 3.
12 Maintenance of biodiversity and high nature value areas, protection of water resources, reduction of greenhouse gases, maintenance of agricultural activity in areas at risk of land abandonment, protection of the territory. 
12 Ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti in območij z visoko naravno vrednostjo, varstvo vodnih virov, zmanjševanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, ohranjanje kmetijske dejavnosti na območjih, ki jim grozi opuščanje zemljišč, zaščita ozemlja.
Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? Picture 3: Example of agri-environment in Poland showing, on the right side, an area without plant cover and soil subject to wind erosion, whereas the left side is covered by rye planted under an agri-environment sub-measure to protect the soil against erosion. © European Union, source: European Court of Auditors. 
7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana? Fotografija 3: Primer kmetijskega okolja na Poljskem, pri katerem je na desni strani območje brez talne odeje in tla, na katerih prihaja do erozije zaradi vetra, levo stran pa pokriva rž, zasejana v okviru kmetijsko-okoljskega podukrepa, da se zemlja zaščiti pred erozijo. © Evropska unija.
EXAMPLES OF PRACTICES DESIGNED TO DELIVER TANGIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS cLear ruLes in the aLLocation of resources 35. 
PRIMERI PRAKS, ZASNOVANIH ZA DOSEGANJE OPRIJEMLJIVIH KORISTI ZA OKOLJE jasna pravila pri dodeljevanju virov 35.
When environmental pressures are identified, the allocation of resources should be justified in terms of their cost effectiveness in achieving environmental benefits in the areas concerned. 
Kadar so ugotovljeni pritiski na okolje, bi bilo treba utemeljiti dodelitev sredstev glede na njihovo stroškovno učinkovitost pri doseganju koristi za okolje na posameznih območjih.
In this regard, England, for example, which the Court visited to review best practice situations, implements an approach which separates entry and higher-level sub-measures. This has improved the clarity and visibility of results, as described in Box 1. 22 Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
V Angliji, na primer, ki jo je Sodišče obiskalo zaradi pregleda najboljših praks, se v zvezi s tem uporablja pristop, v skladu s katerim se razlikuje med podukrepi na začetni ravni in tistimi na višji ravni, kar je povečalo jasnost in prepoznavnost rezultatov, kot je opisano v okviru 1. 22 Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
Three of the Member States audited also use separate budget allocations for different types of sub-measures. 
Tri od revidiranih držav članic prav tako uporabljajo ločeno dodeljevanje proračunskih sredstev za različne vrste podukrepov.
In its rural development programme, Hungary states that it does not intend to spend more than 35 % of the allocated funds on sub-measures with lower environmental outputs. 
Madžarska v svojem programu razvoja podeželja navaja, da ne namerava porabiti več kot 35 % dodeljenih sredstev za podukrepe, ki prinašajo manjše okoljske učinke.
Poland allocated a specific budget to two of the nine sub-measures in its rural development programme. 
Poljska je v svojem programu razvoja podeželja dodelila poseben proračun za dva od devetih podukrepov.
The budget allocated to one of them, concerning the protection of endangered bird species and natural habitats in Natura 2000 areas, represents 19 % of the total budget for agri-environment payments for the period 2007–13. 
Proračun za enega od njiju, ki se nanaša na varstvo ogroženih ptičjih vrst in naravnih habitatov na območjih Natura 2000, predstavlja 19 % celotnega proračuna za kmetijsko-okoljska plačila v obdobju 2007–2013.
France allocated 27 % of the 2007–13 budget to the targeted sub-measures described in Box 5. aLternative poLicies to agri-environment payments were given LittLe consideration 37. 
Francija je dodelila 27 % proračuna za obdobje 2007-2013 za ciljno usmerjene podukrepe, opisane v okviru 5. le malo se je upoštevalo politiKe, Ki pomenijo drugo možnost poleg KmetijsKo-oKoljsKih plačil 37.
Agri-environment payments are one of a number of policies used to protect and improve the environment. 
Kmetijsko-okoljska plačila so ena od politik za varstvo in izboljšanje okolja.
The Member States can, for instance, also act through regulatory provisions, specific taxes or enhanced training and advice. 
Države članice lahko, na primer, uporabijo tudi zakonske določbe, posebne davke ali boljše usposabljanje in svetovanje.
Considering such alternative policies would help demonstrate where the agri-environment payment approach is the best way to tackle the pressures identified. 
Upoštevanje teh alternativnih politik bi pomagalo pojasniti, kdaj so kmetijsko-okoljska plačila najboljši način za obravnavanje ugotovljenih pritiskov.
23 BOX 1 ENTRY AND HIGHER-LEVEL SUB-MEASURES IN ENGLAND In England the national authorities identified environmental pressures in different geographical areas. 
23 OKVIR 1 PODUKREPI NA ZAČETNI IN VIŠJI RAVNI V ANGLIJI V Angliji so nacionalni organi opredelili pritiske na okolje na različnih zemljepisnih območjih.
They analysed which type of sub-measure (in England split in entry and higher-level schemes) was more cost-effective in achieving environmental benefits. 
Analizirali so, katera vrsta podukrepov (v Angliji razdeljenih na sheme na začetni in višji ravni) je bila bolj stroškovno učinkovita pri doseganju koristi za okolje.
This resulted in a budget for entry-level schemes determined on the basis of a target to have 70 % of agricultural land under entry-level agri-environment contracts. 
Posledica tega je bila, da je bil proračun za sheme na začetni ravni določen na podlagi ciljne vrednosti, da bodo za 70 % kmetijskih površin sklenjene kmetijsko-okoljske pogodbe na začetni ravni.
The remaining budget is allocated to higher-level schemes and is split over nine regions based on their size and environmental features as well as past and predicted uptake figures. 
Preostanek proračuna se dodeli shemam na višji ravni in se porazdeli po devetih regijah glede na njihovo velikost, okoljske posebnosti ter pretekle in napovedane zneske črpanja.
In each region, so called ‘target areas’ have been identified, which are prioritised under the higher-level scheme on the basis of criteria such as relevance for biodiversity, landscape, natural resource protection (e.g. erosion), etc. For each target area, potential beneficiaries are informed on the land management activities adequate to the areas. 
V vsaki regiji so bila opredeljena tako imenovana „ciljna območja“, za katera se določi prednostni vrstni red v okviru sheme na višji ravni na podlagi meril, kot so pomembnost za biotsko raznovrstnost, pokrajino, varovanje naravnih virov (npr. pred erozijo) itd. Za vsako ciljno območje se obvesti morebitne upravičence o dejavnostih upravljanja zemljišč, primernih za ta območja.
Specific indicators are established to monitor the results obtained (see paragraph 51). 
Za spremljanje doseženih rezultatov se uvedejo posamezni kazalniki (glej odstavek 51).
The Court found only two cases (France, Sweden) where such alternative policies were explicitly considered in the rural development programmes. 
Sodišče je odkrilo samo dva primera (Francija in Švedska), ko so bile te alternativne politike izrecno upoštevane v programih razvoja podeželja.
The Swedish rural development programme explains that the legislative provisions in place are among the most important alternative policy means for reducing the negative impact of the use of fertilisers and plant protection products. 
Švedski program razvoja podeželja pojasnjuje, da so veljavne zakonske določbe med najpomembnejšimi alternativnimi sredstvi politike za zmanjševanje negativnih posledic uporabe gnojil in sredstev za zaščito rastlin.
The programme provides a forecast for future prospects and envisages the redesign of agri-environment payments in the light of legislative changes. 
Program vključuje napoved prihodnjih možnosti in predvideno novo zasnovo kmetijsko-okoljskih plačil glede na zakonske spremembe.
The French programme describes the synergy between national and EU policies and mentions agri-environment payments as one of the available tools (along with national regulations, tax policy, etc) for tackling certain issues (biodiversity, water, etc). 
Francoski program opisuje sinergijo med nacionalnimi politikami in politikami EU ter omenja kmetijsko-okoljska plačila kot eno od orodij, ki so na voljo (poleg nacionalnih predpisov, davčne politike itd.) za reševanje posameznih vprašanj (biotska raznovrstnost, vode itd.).
In Poland and Germany (Berlin and Brandenburg), the rural development programmes did not explain why agri-environment payments were the most adequate way to address the environmental needs. 
Na Poljskem in v Nemčiji (Berlin in Brandenburg) v programih razvoja podeželja ni pojasnjeno, zakaj so kmetijsko-okoljska plačila najustreznejši način za obravnavanje okoljskih potreb.
For example, the Polish agri-environment sub-measure for buffer strips could also have been implemented through cross compliance, which is part of the reference level (see glossary). 
Poljski kmetijsko-okoljski podukrep za varovalne pasove, na primer, bi lahko izvajali tudi kot del navzkrižne skladnosti, ki je del referenčne ravni (glej glosar).
ACHIEVEMENTS OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENT POLICY CANNOT BE EASILY MONITORED the common monitoring and evaLuation framework represents progress but does not produce sufficient, reLevant and reLiabLe data 40. 
DOSEŽKOV KMETIJSKO-OKOLJSKE POLITIKE NI LAHKO SPREMLJATI oKvir sKupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja pomeni napredeK, vendar ne daje zadostnih, primernih in zanesljivih podatKov 40.
The common monitoring and evaluation framework for the 2007–13 rural development programmes represents an improvement compared with the situation before 2007. 
Okvir skupnega spremljanja in vrednotenja za programe razvoja podeželja za obdobje 2007–2013 pomeni napredek v primerjavi s stanjem pred letom 2007.
Among other things, this framework provides for a set of common indicators which Member States must include in their programmes. 
Med drugim ta okvir prinaša sklop skupnih kazalnikov, ki jih morajo države članice vključiti v svoje programe.
Output and result indicators are reported annually to the Commission. 
Vsako leto poročajo Komisiji o kazalnikih učinka in rezultatov.
The latter then checks the consistency and reliability of the indicators and the data reported. 
Ta nato preveri doslednost in zanesljivost sporočenih kazalnikov in podatkov.
On the basis of these checks, the Commission identified numerous shortcomings, the main ones being missing or incorrect data, a lack of consistency between different tables and mistakes in reported expenditure. 
Na podlagi teh preverjanj je Komisija ugotovila številne pomanjkljivosti, od katerih so bile najpomembnejše manjkajoči ali nepravilni podatki, neskladnost različnih tabel in napake pri sporočenih odhodkih.
13 SpecialReportNo8/2008: Is cross compliance an effective policy, paragraph 60 and Box 3. 24 Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
13 Posebnoporočilošt.8/2008– Ali je navzkrižna skladnost uspešna politika?, odstavek 60 in okvir 3. 24 Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
The Court’s audit confirmed the shortcomings identified by the Commission and found that data from several Member States were not reliable. 
Revizija, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, je potrdila pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je našla Komisija, in ugotovila, da podatki več držav članic niso bili zanesljivi.
For instance, in Andalusia, the output and result indicators bore no relation to the agri-environment expenditure. 
V Andaluziji, na primer, kazalniki učinkov in rezultatov sploh niso bili povezani s kmetijsko-okoljskimi odhodki.
In France, the Court found several weaknesses, including missing data in the tables sent to the Commission for the year 2008. 
V Franciji je Sodišče ugotovilo več pomanjkljivosti, vključno z manjkajočimi podatki v tabelah, poslanih Komisiji za leto 2008.
In addition, the practice of continuing to include data after contracts have expired overstates the results of EU expenditure. 
Poleg tega navada, da se podatki vključujejo tudi po izteku pogodb, pomeni, da so rezultati, ki so posledica odhodkov EU, prikazani kot pretirani.
All the finished schemes are considered to be continuing to provide the same effects until the end of the programming period 14. 
Za vse zaključene sheme se šteje, da še naprej dosegajo enake učinke vse do konca programskega obdobja14.