natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
While each individual indicator has advantages and disadvantages, the set of indicators defined in this context provides the best possible balance between the information needs and the related costs and administrative burdens. 
Vsak posamezen kazalnik ima sicer prednosti in slabosti, vendar sklop kazalnikov, opredeljen v tem okviru, zagotavlja najboljše možno ravnovesje med potrebami po informacijah ter s tem povezanimi stroški in upravnim bremenom.
Reply of the Commission 54 IX (a) The Commission partially accepts this recommendation and will consider how it might be implemented. 
Odgovori Komisije 54 IX(a) Komisija deloma sprejema to priporočilo in bo preučila, kako bi ga lahko izvedla.
The Commission considers that the existing framework for providing information on the income derived from agricultural activities could be strengthened but that the administrative burdens of developing a framework for providing information on the disposable income of farm households may outweigh the potential benefits. 
Komisija meni, da bi obstoječi okvir za zagotavljanje informacij o dohodku iz kmetijskih dejavnosti sicer lahko okrepili, vendar bi upravno breme zaradi razvoja okvira za zagotavljanje informacij o razpoložljivem dohodku kmečkih gospodinjstev lahko prevladalo nad morebitnimi koristmi.
The legal basis required for such data collection would be delicate to establish. 
Pravno podlago, ki je potrebna za tako zbiranje podatkov, bi bilo težko določiti.
The disposable income of farm households is a much wider concept than farm income. 
Razpoložljivi dohodek kmečkih gospodinjstev je precej širši koncept od dohodka kmetije.
The CAP supports farmers’ income by supporting their agricultural activities. 
SKP podpira dohodek kmetov s podpiranjem njihove kmetijske dejavnosti.
Thus, it is important to analyse the evolution of income derived from agricultural activities to evaluate whether the objective has been met. 
Da bi ocenili, ali je bil cilj izpolnjen, je zato pomembno analizirati razvoj dohodka iz kmetijskih dejavnosti.
IX (b) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
IX(b) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission intends to: — develop the EAAs with a view to providing more detailed information on the factors impacting agricultural income; — undertake a study to examine the issue of whether the EAAs can be further developed to provide a reasonable estimate of the economic value of the public goods that are produced by farmers; — discuss with the Member States the possibility of formalising the operational arrangements to cover regional EAAs; — review whether EAA information is used appropriately in income indicators. 
Komisija namerava: – razviti ekonomske račune za kmetijstvo (ERK), da bi zagotovili podrobnejše informacije o dejavnikih, ki vplivajo na kmetijski dohodek; – izvesti študijo za preučitev vprašanja, ali je ERK mogoče nadalje razviti, da bi zagotovili razumno oceno gospodarske vrednosti javnih dobrin, ki jih proizvajajo kmetje; – z državami članicami razpravljati o možnosti, da bi formalizirali operativne dogovore za kritje regionalnih ERK; – pregledati, ali se informacije ERK v kazalnikih dohodka ustrezno uporabljajo.
IX (c) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
IX(c) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
FADN data already cover almost the totality of EU subsidies. 
Podatki mreže FADN že zajemajo skoraj vse subvencije EU.
IX (d) As regards the EAAs, the Commission accepts the recommendation. 
IX(d) Komisija sprejema priporočilo glede ERK.
The Commission intends to introduce regular quality reporting on the EAAs and compliance assessment with a view to obtaining reasonable assurances that Member States set up a quality assurance framework. 
Komisija namerava uvesti redno poročanje o kakovosti ERK in ocenjevanje skladnosti, da bi dobila razumno zagotovilo, da so države članice vzpostavile okvir za zagotavljanje kakovosti.
As regards the FADN, the Commission intends to address weaknesses identified in the implementation of the FADN by agreeing a clear timetable with the Member States concerned and encouraging better use of the system’s potential. 
V zvezi z mrežo FADN namerava obravnavati slabosti, odkrite pri izvajanju mreže FADN, tako da se bo z zadevnimi državami članicami dogovorila za jasen časovni načrt in spodbudila boljšo izkoriščenost potenciala sistema.
The Commission is aware of the FADN’s performance problems in individual Member States and actions are already ongoing to tackle existing weaknesses. An annual plan of on-the-spot visits is realised, together with action plans and follow up meetings to assess the progress made on agreed points. 
Komisija se zaveda težav pri uspešnosti izvajanja mreže FADN v posameznih državah članicah, ukrepi za odpravo obstoječih slabosti pa se že izvajajo. Uresničen je letni načrt obiskov na kraju samem, skupaj z akcijskimi načrti in sestanki za nadaljnje spremljanje, da bi se ocenil doseženi napredek glede dogovorjenih točk.
In recent years this approach has led to considerable improvements in several Member States. 
V zadnjih letih je ta pristop pripeljal do pomembnih izboljšav v več državah članicah.
Reply of the Commission 55 X The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Odgovori Komisije 55 X Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The indicators as defined are only the starting point for the evaluations. 
Kazalniki, kakor so opredeljeni, so zgolj izhodišče za vrednotenja.
In this context, it is good practice for evaluators to use additional information for judging on the results achieved. 
V tem okviru je za ocenjevalce dobra praksa, da za oceno doseženih rezultatov uporabljajo dodatne informacije.
Evaluations judge — amongst other things — the effectiveness and efficiency of the CAP measures against their objectives. 
Z vrednotenji se med drugim ocenjujeta uspešnost in učinkovitost ukrepov SKP glede na njihove cilje.
Introduction 03 For direct payments, the 2003 CAP reform initiated a shift from payments linked to the type of production to payments decoupled from production. 
Uvod 3 Z reformo SKP iz leta 2003 je bil glede neposrednih plačil uveden prehod od plačil, vezanih na vrsto proizvodnje, na plačila, ločena od proizvodnje.
This was done to strengthen the market orientation of agriculture (no more constraints on farmers’ production choices) and in line with our World Trade Organisation commitments. 
Namen tega je bil okrepiti tržno usmerjenost kmetijstva (brez omejitev za proizvodne odločitve kmetov), pri čemer je bil prehod skladen z našimi obveznostmi v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
But both types of support, pre-2003 and post-2003, were a form of farm income support. 
Vendar sta bili obe vrsti podpore, pred letom 2003 in po njem, oblika dohodkovne podpore za kmetijo.
Other CAP instruments also play a role in supporting farmers’ income, such as investment aid or payment in areas with natural constraints (rural development) and market measures (single market organisation). 
Tudi drugi instrumenti SKP, kot so investicijska pomoč ali plačilo za območja z naravnimi omejitvami (razvoj podeželja) in tržni ukrepi (skupna ureditev trga), imajo pomembno vlogo pri podpori dohodkom kmetov.
Moreover, one of the main trends in the last 10 years is a growing emphasis on environmental and climate concerns, not just through the introduction of the green payment in 2013, but also through cross-compliance and many other environmental measures. 
Poleg tega je med glavnimi trendi v zadnjih desetih letih vse večji poudarek na okoljskih in podnebnih preudarkih, ne samo z uvedbo zelene komponente plačil v letu 2013, temveč tudi z navzkrižno skladnostjo in številnimi drugimi okoljskimi ukrepi.
CAP support is expected to provide farm income support, but at the same time contributes to environmental (and climate) improvements. 
Od podpore SKP se pričakuje, da bo podprla dohodek kmetije, hkrati pa prispevala k okoljskim (in podnebnim) izboljšavam.
04 The objectives of the CAP and the specific rational for direct payments and other instruments have been largely discussed with stakeholders and other institutions in the preparation of the reform. 
4 Pri pripravi reforme se je z deležniki in drugimi institucijami veliko razpravljalo o ciljih SKP ter posebni utemeljitvi za neposredna plačila in druge instrumente.
There has been a public debate, a communication and, for example the Commission legislative proposals for direct payments contained an explanatory memorandum which set out the rational for the reform (COM(2011) 625 final/2). 
Na voljo so bili javna razprava, sporočilo in na primer zakonodajni predlogi Komisije za neposredna plačila iz obrazložitvenega memoranduma, v katerem je bila predstavljena utemeljitev za reformo (COM(2011) 625 final/2).
Besides, the three general objectives of the CAP have been embedded in Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 (Article 110) and the specific objectives are set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 834/2014 (recital (2)). 
Poleg tega so bili v Uredbo (EU) št. 1306/2013 (člen 110) vključeni trije splošni cilji SKP, v Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št.
06 The CAP supports farmers’ income by supporting the agricultural activity (area-based support, a few sector-specific supports, investments, market measures, environmental activities in agricultural areas). 
6 SKP podpira dohodek kmetov s financiranjem kmetijske dejavnosti (podpora na površino, nekaj podpor, značilnih za posamezen sektor, naložbe, tržni ukrepi, okoljske dejavnosti na kmetijskih površinah).
Therefore, it is consistent to monitor the income generated from these agricultural activities. 
Zato je primerno spremljati dohodek iz teh kmetijskih dejavnosti.
Monitoring the total farm household income at EU level is interesting, but should not be the basis for determining the need for support which is targeted at the farming activities. 
Spremljanje skupnega dohodka kmečkih gospodinjstev na ravni EU je zanimivo, vendar ne bi smelo biti podlaga za ugotavljanje potrebe po podpori, ki je usmerjena na kmetijske dejavnosti.
The Commission considers that the concept of overall disposable income of the farm household (total income minus taxes and social security contributions) is not the most relevant for the purposes of the CAP. 
Komisija meni, da koncept skupnega razpoložljivega dohodka kmečkega gospodinjstva (skupni dohodek minus davki in prispevki za socialno varnost) za namene SKP ni najpomembnejši.
The fair standard of living for the agricultural community is to be ensured in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture. 
Primerno življenjsko raven kmetijske skupnosti je treba zagotoviti zlasti s povečanjem individualnega zaslužka oseb, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom.
Reply of the Commission 56 12 Recital 68 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 also stipulates the objectives against which this has to be done. 
Odgovori Komisije 56 12 Uvodna izjava 68 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 določa tudi cilje, glede na katere je to treba storiti.
To do this, the indicators defined in Implementing Regulations (EU) No 808/2014 and (EU) No 834/2014 are used. 
808/2014 in (EU) št. 834/2014.
15 The indicators provide the basis for an assessment of the performance of the CAP against its objectives, i.e.: effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU value added. 
15 Kazalniki zagotavljajo podlago za ocenjevanje uspešnosti izvajanja SKP glede na njene cilje, tj. uspešnost, učinkovitost, ustreznost, skladnost in dodano vrednost za EU.
However, indicators as such, in particular when taken in isolation, do not allow for assessment of the performance of a policy, measure or activity, since the evolution of the indicator value over time needs to be assessed and understood in the context in which it occurs. 
Vendar kazalniki kot taki, zlasti obravnavani ločeno, ne omogočajo ocenjevanja uspešnosti izvajanja politike, ukrepa ali dejavnosti, saj je treba razvoj vrednosti kazalnika skozi čas oceniti in razumeti v okviru, v katerem se pojavlja.
16 Following the Court’s audit, the Commission revised the legal framework of the FADN by including, amongst other things, income derived from other gainful activities. 
16 Komisija je na podlagi revizije Sodišča spremenila pravni okvir mreže FADN, tako da je med drugim vključila dohodek iz drugih pridobitnih dejavnosti.
Observations 25 - Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) of the CAP The common monitoring and evaluation framework (CMEF) has been clearly defined in the legislation, including in relation to farmers’ incomes. 
Opažanja 25 – Skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja (CMEF) SKP Skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja je bil v zakonodaji jasno opredeljen, vključno v zvezi z dohodki kmetov.
It sets out a hierarchy of indicators linked to various levels of CAP impacts, results, outputs and context. 
Določa hierarhijo kazalnikov, povezanih z različnimi ravnmi učinkov, rezultatov, realizacij in okoliščin SKP.
For each of these indicators, the corresponding data sources have been identified, with an emphasis on established data collection tools. 
Za vsakega od teh kazalnikov so bili opredeljeni ustrezni podatkovni viri, poudarek pa je bil na uveljavljenih orodjih za zbiranje podatkov.
While improvements are always possible, a set of data clearly exists. 
Čeprav so izboljšave vedno mogoče, je nabor podatkov nedvomno že na voljo.
26 Article 39(1)(b) TFEU links the objective of ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community with agricultural productivity. 
26 V členu 39(1)(b) PDEU je cilj zagotavljanja primerne življenjske ravni za kmetijsko skupnost povezan s kmetijsko produktivnostjo.
This link is already enshrined in the provision itself, which refers specifically to ‘persons engaged in agriculture’. 
Ta povezava je vključena že v samo določbo, ki se posebej sklicuje na „osebe, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetij-stvom“.
This reference does not cover persons not engaged in agriculture (such as household members carrying out other professions), nor the activities of a farmer that are clearly not related at all to agriculture. 
To sklicevanje ne zajema niti oseb, ki se ne ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom (kot so člani gospodinjstva, ki opravljajo druge poklice), niti dejavnosti kmeta, ki očitno sploh niso povezane s kmetijstvom.
Accordingly, Article 39(1)(b) TFEU is also clearly linked to Article 39(1)(a) TFEU (‘increase agricultural productivity’), as is underlined by the word ‘thus’ at the beginning of Article 39(1)(b) TFEU. 
Zato je člen 39(1)(b) PDEU tudi jasno povezan s členom 39(1)(a) PDEU („povečati kmetijsko produktivnost“), kot je poudarjeno z besedama „s tem“ na začetku člena 39(1)(b) PDEU.
The Commission therefore considers that it is appropriate to focus on the income derived from agricultural activities (including ancillary activities), as this income is of primary importance for the CAP (and not the overall household income outside of agriculture and rural development). 
Komisija zato meni, da se je primerno osredotočiti na dohodek iz kmetijskih dejavnosti (vključno s pomožnimi dejavnostmi), saj je ta bistvenega pomena za SKP (ne pa na skupni dohodek gospodinjstva zunaj kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja).
27 The statistical framework to provide information on the income from agricultural activities is represented by the FADN and the EAAs. 
27 Statistični okvir za zagotavljanje informacij o dohodku kmetov iz kmetijskih dejavnosti je predstavljen v mreži FADN in ERK.
Information on the income of agricultural households is collected in the framework of EU-SILC and the size of the sample is designed to cover the population as a whole. 
Informacije o dohodku kmečkih gospodinjstev se zbirajo v okviru statistike EU-SILC, velikost vzorca pa je zasnovana tako, da pokrije populacijo kot celoto.
It does not, in general, allow for disaggregated data for the agricultural sector in most Member States. 
Na splošno v večini držav članic ne omogoča razčlenjenih podatkov za kmetijstvo.
Due to the fact that available information points to the growing significance of incomes that are not related to agricultural activity sensu stricto but to the diversification of farming activity, the FADN survey has undergone a thorough revision which includes a completely new set of data on income from other gainful activities related to the holding in the farm income calculation. 
Ker razpoložljive informacije kažejo, da so vse pomembnejši dohodki, ki niso strogo povezani s kmetijsko dejavnostjo, temveč z njeno diverzifikacijo, je bila izvedena temeljita revizija statistične raziskave FADN, s katero je bil v izračun dohodka kmetije vključen popolnoma nov nabor podatkov o dohodku iz drugih pridobitnih dejavnosti, povezanih s kmetijskim gospodarstvom.
The Commission has indeed studied the feasibility of collecting micro-level data on farm household incomes. 
Komisija je dejansko preučila izvedljivost zbiranja podatkov o dohodkih kmečkih gospodinjstev na mikroravni.
However, the project on the income of the agricultural household sector (IAHS) was not further pursued in the context of the Standing Committee for Agricultural Statistics (CPSA). 
Vendar se projekt o dohodku sektorja kmečkih gospodinjstev (IAHS) ni nadaljeval v okviru Stalnega odbora za kmetijsko statistiko (CPSA).
Reply of the Commission 57 28 The size of the EU-SILC sample is designed to cover the population as a whole and does not, in general, allow for disaggregated results for the agricultural sector with an acceptable precision in most Member States. 
Odgovori Komisije 57 28 Velikost vzorca statistike EU-SILC je zasnovana tako, da pokrije populacijo kot celoto, in na splošno v večini držav članic ne omogoča razčlenjenih rezultatov za kmetijstvo.
30 - Income comparison across sectors of the economy The Commission considers it to be important to compare the income from agricultural activities to the average wages in other sectors of the economy and that there is a reference system for this1. 
30 – Primerjava dohodkov po gospodarskih sektorjih Komisija meni, da je pomembno primerjati dohodek iz kmetijskih dejavnosti s povprečnimi plačami v drugih gospodarskih sektorjih in da za to obstaja referenčni sistem1.
The CAP supports farmers’ income by supporting the agricultural activity (area-based support, a few sector-specific supports, investments, market measures, environmental activities on agricultural areas). 
SKP podpira dohodek kmetov s financiranjem kmetijske dejavnosti (podpora na površino, nekaj podpor, značilnih za posamezen sektor, naložbe, tržni ukrepi, okoljske dejavnosti na kmetijskih površinah).
Therefore, it is consistent to monitor the income generated from these agricultural activities and compare it to the opportunity costs, namely to the wages that could be received in other sectors. 
Zato je primerno spremljati dohodek iz teh kmetijskih dejavnosti in ga primerjati z oportunitetnimi stroški, namreč plačami, ki bi jih bilo mogoče prejeti v drugih sektorjih.
Monitoring the total farm household income at EU level is interesting, but it should not be the basis for determining the need for support which is targeted at the farming activities. 
Spremljanje skupnega dohodka kmečkih gospodinjstev na ravni EU je zanimivo, vendar ne bi smelo biti podlaga za ugotavljanje potrebe po podpori, ki je usmerjena na kmetijske dejavnosti.
32 Comparisons of income levels of different groups of farms are regularly done on the basis of FADN data. 
32 Ravni dohodkov različnih skupin kmetij se redno primerjajo na podlagi podatkov mreže FADN.
Such a differentiation is not possible in national accounts, either for agriculture or for other sectors of the economy. 
Tako razlikovanje v nacionalnih računih ni mogoče niti za kmetijstvo niti za druge gospodarske sektorje.
Obtained values serve as indications on how agriculture compares with other sectors of the economy, which are likewise highly diverse. 
Dobljene vrednosti kažejo, kako se kmetijstvo primerja z drugimi gospodarskimi sektorji, ki so prav tako izjemno raznovrstni.
33 The EAAs are compiled in accordance with the basic concepts and rules of ESA 952. 
33 ERK se sestavljajo v skladu s temeljnimi koncepti in pravili sistema ESR 952.
Regulation (EU) No 549/2013, however, does not apply to EAAs and application of ESA 2010 (the revised version of ESA 95) can only be made through changes to the EAAs legal act, which are in progress. 
Vendar se Uredba (ES) št. 549/2013 za ERK ne uporablja, uporaba sistema ESR 2010 (revidirana različica sistema ESR 95) pa je mogoča le s spremembami pravnega akta ERK, ki se pripravljajo.
The main changes from ESA 95 to ESA 2010 were not specifically connected with agriculture. 
Glavne spremembe pri prehodu z ESR 95 na ESR 2010 se niso nanašale posebej na kmetijstvo.
Certain Member States examined the consequences of the change: some concluded that the impact was minor, others that there was no impact. 
Nekatere države članice so preučile posledice spremembe: nekatere so ugotovile, da je bil učinek majhen, druge pa, da ga ni bilo.
34 Indeed, the EAAs have not been designed to help analyse the dependency of specific sectors on subsidies and their importance for viable farming in the regions, for specific types of production or for specific socioeconomic groups of farmers. 
34 ERK dejansko niso bili zasnovani tako, da bi pripomogli k analizi odvisnosti določenih sektorjev od subvencij in njihovega pomena za rentabilno kmetovanje v zadevnih regijah, za posebne vrste proizvodnje ali za posebne socialno-ekonomske skupine kmetov.
Therefore, the Commission uses the FADN to evaluate the impact of subsidies at farm level. 
Zato Komisija za vrednotenje učinka subvencij na ravni kmetij uporablja mrežo FADN.
1 Figures should be interpreted with care owing to conceptual differences between the measurement of farmers’ income from agricultural activities and average wages in the economy, and to the lack of reliable data on full-time equivalent labour statistics for the total economy for some Member States. 
1 Številke bi bilo treba razlagati previdno zaradi konceptualnih razlik med merjenjem dohodka kmetov iz kmetijskih dejavnosti in povprečnimi plačami v gospodarstvu ter zaradi pomanjkanja zanesljivih podatkov o ekvivalentu polnega delovnega časa v statistiki dela za celotno gospodarstvo za nekatere države članice.
2 ESA is the European system of national accounts and regional accounts used by the Member States of the European Union and beyond. 
2 ESR je evropski sistem nacionalnih in regionalnih računov, ki se uporablja v državah članicah Evropske unije in drugje.
Reply of the Commission 58 35 The Commission agrees that data on land prices and rents are important for assessing the impact of the CAP. 
Odgovori Komisije 58 35 Komisija se strinja, da so podatki o cenah zemljišč in najemninah pomembni za oceno učinka SKP.
In November 2014 and July 2015, the Commission presented to the CPSA and the DGAS, respectively, a draft Commission regulation on land prices and rents, which would be an intermediate step towards an eventual Parliament and Council regulation. 
Novembra 2014 in julija 2015 je v CPSA oziroma DGAS predstavila osnutek uredbe Komisije o cenah zemljišč in najemninah, ki bi bila vmesna faza pred morebitno uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
In the CPSA and DGAS there was no consensus in favour of the Commission regulation. 
V CPSA in DGAS ni bilo soglasja v podporo uredbi Komisije.
It was concluded that land price statistics were sensitive and that small numbers of transactions could lead to unreliable statistics. 
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so statistike o cenah zemljišč občutljive in da bi bila lahko statistika zaradi malo transakcij nezanesljiva.
The ‘Strategy for agriculture statistics 2020 and beyond’ foresees the potential inclusion of agricultural price statistics in a framework regulation on agricultural input/output statistics. 
V „Strategiji za kmetijsko statistiko do leta 2020 in pozneje“ je predvidena morebitna vključitev kmetijskih statističnih podatkov o cenah v okvirno uredbo o statistiki kmetijskih vložkih/proizvodov.