natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN 162 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ' S O B S E R VA T I O N S INTRODUCTION 7.1. This chapter presents the Court’s specific assessment of Education and Citizenship which comprises policy areas 15 — Education and Culture, 16 — Communication; and 18 — Freedom, Security and Justice. 
SL 162 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A UVOD 7.1 VtempoglavjujepredstavljenaposebnaocenaSodišča o skupini politik „izobraževanje in državljanstvo“, ki zajema področja politik 15 – izobraževanje in kultura, 16 – komu­ niciranje ter 18 – območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
Key information on the activities covered and the payments in 2009 is provided in Table 7.1. 
Ključne informacije o zajetih dejavnostih in plačilih v letu 2009 so navedene v tabeli 7.1.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 163 T H E C O U R T ' S O B S E R VA T I O N S Specific characteristics of the policy group 7.2. Thethreebudgettitlesinthispolicygrouparealmost exclusively managed by three corresponding Directorates General (DGs) of the Commission. These are DG Education and Culture (DG EAC) for budget line 15, DG Communication (DG COMM) for budget line 16 and DG Justice, Freedom and Security (DG JLS) for budget line 18. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 163 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A Posebne značilnosti skupine politik 7.2 Omenjene tri proračunske naslove v tej skupini politik upravljajo skoraj izključno trije s tem povezani generalni direk­ torati (GD) Komisije, in sicer GD za izobraževanje in kulturo (GD EAC) proračunski naslov 15, GD za komuniciranje (GD COMM) proračunski naslov 16 in GD za pravosodje, svobodo in varnost (GD JLS) proračunski naslov 18.
The majority of expen­ diture in this area is managed in an indirect centralised way or through shared management, with the implementation of actions in the form of multiannual programmes delegated to the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA), National Agencies(1) or similar management structures in Member States. 
Večina odhodkov za to skupino politik se upravlja posredno centralizirano ali deljeno, pri čemer je izvajanje ukrepov v obliki večletnih programov preneseno na Izvajalsko agencijo za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno področje in kulturo (EACEA), nacionalne agencije (1) ali podobne upravljavske strukture v državah članicah.
The responsible entities in Member States allocate grants and contracts to projects or measures carried out by private and public beneficiaries. 7.3. 
Pristojni subjekti v državah članicah dodeljujejo sred­ stva in sklepajo pogodbe za projekte ali ukrepe, ki jih izvajajo zasebni ali javni upravičenci.
EU support in the domains of Education and Citi­ zenship is characterised by a multiplicity of funding schemes for various thematic areas and types of projects such as grants to actions in favour of Citizenship or for mobility in the education and training sectors. 
7.3 ZapodporoEUnapodročjihizobraževanjaindrža­ vljanstva so značilne številne sheme financiranja različnih tematskih področij in vrst projektov, kot so donacije za ukrepe v podporo državljanstvu ali za mobilnost v sektorjih izobraže­ vanja in usposabljanja.
Projects are carried out not only by education and training organisations, but also by other non profit organisations, private firms and public admin­ istrations. 
Projektov ne izvajajo samo organizacije za izobraževanje in usposabljanje, ampak tudi druge nepri­ dobitne organizacije, zasebna podjetja in javne uprave.
The final beneficiaries of mobility actions are indi­ viduals, mostly EU citizens. 
Končni upravičenci pri ukrepih mobilnosti so posamezniki, večinoma državljani EU.
Management of some programmes, namely the External Borders Fund, the Integration Fund, the Return Fund and the European Refugee Fund is, however, mostly, shared with Member States. 7.4. 
Upravljanje nekaterih programov, kot so Sklad za zunanje meje, Evropski sklad za vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav, Evropski sklad za vračanje in Evropski sklad za begunce, pa je večinoma deljeno z državami članicami.
The funding in this policy group mostly includes advances to traditional EU agencies and National Agencies, in addition to quarterly contributions to their operating costs. 
7.4 Financiranje v tej skupini politik v glavnem zajema predplačila tradicionalnim agencijam EU in nacionalnim agencijam ter četrtletne prispevke za njihove stroške poslo­ vanja.
Payments to National Agencies are made after the signature of a contract or acceptance of a work programme, or in the case of most second and third pre-financings, on the acceptance by the Commission that 70 % of the funds already advanced have been disbursed. 
Plačila nacionalnim agencijam se izvršijo po podpisu pogodbe ali sprejetju delovnega programa oziroma, v primeru večine drugih in tretjih obrokov, predfinanciranja, ko Komisija potrdi, da je bilo 70 % izplačanih predplačil že razdeljenih med upravičence.
These advances normally accumulate to 100 % of the maximum allowed. 
Predplačila se običajno izplačujejo, dokler ne dosežejo 100 % najvišjega dovoljenega zneska.
The limited conditionality for receiving advance payments means that the risk of error is very low. 
Zaradi omejitev v pogojih za prejemanje predplačil je tveganje napak zelo majhno.
The risk of error for interim and final payments is considered higher than for advance payments. Interim and final payments are based on actual costs to be reimbursed, so there is a risk that ineligible, overstated or unsubstantiated costs are included in beneficiaries’ cost declar­ ations and not detected by the managing body or the Commission. _____________ (1) Having a contractual relationship with the Commission. 
Višje je pri vmesnih in končnih plačilih, saj temeljijo na dejanskih stroških, ki jih je treba povrniti, zato obstaja tveganje, da izjave o stroških, ki jih predložijo upravičenci, vsebujejo neupravičene, previsoke ali neutemeljene stroške in da jih organ upravljanja ali Komisija ne odkrije. _____________ (1) Te imajo pogodbeno razmerje s Komisijo.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ' S R E P L I E S 7.4. In order to minimise the risk of ineligible expenditure on final payments DG EAC has extended the use of lump sums and flat rate grants in the present generation of programmes. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 7.4 Da bi zmanjšali tveganje neupravičenih izdatkov pri končnih plačilih je GD za izobraževanje in kulturo podaljšal uporabo povprečnin in pavšalnih donacij v sedanji generaciji programov.
Controls have also been imposed at the level of National Agencies, notably on-the-spot checks, desk-checks and audits with minimum requirements based on risk assessment. 
Uvedene so bile tudi kontrole na ravni nacionalnih agencij, zlasti inšpekcijski nadzori na kraju samem, dokumentacijski pregledi in revizije z minimalnimi zahtevami na podlagi ocene tveganja.
In the policy area Education and Culture, the Commission has set up its supervisory and control system based on a single audit approach with primary controls at the level of the National Agencies, secondary controls performed by the National Authorities and super­ visory controls at Commission level. 
Na področju politik v zvezi z izobraževanjem in kulturo je Komisija vzpostavila svoj nadzorni in kontrolni sistem na podlagi enega samega revizijskega pristopa s primarnimi kontrolami na ravni nacionalnih agencij, sekundarnimi kontrolami, ki jih izvajajo nacionalni organi, in nadzornimi kontrolami na ravni Komisije.
EN 164 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ' S O B S E R VA T I O N S 7.5. TheNationalagenciesenterintograntagreementswith participating organisations(2), and use the Commission advances they have received to make advances to these organi­ sations of between 80 % and 100 %, depending on the type of programme. 
SL 164 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 7.5 Nacionalneagencijesklepajosporazumeododelitvi sredstev s sodelujočimi organizacijami (2) in iz predplačil, ki so jih prejele od Komisije, tem organizacijam izplačujejo od 80-do 100-odstotna predplačila, odvisno od vrste programa.
These projects are completed within a period of up to three years, leading to final reports and closures between the National agency and beneficiaries. 
Ti projekti se končajo v obdobju največ treh let, nato se pripravijo končna poročila in finančna izravnava med nacio­ nalno agencijo in upravičenci.
The National Agency submits to the Commission a Yearly National Agency Report that contains the financial reports for all open agreements between the Agency and the Commission. 
Prva pošlje Komisiji svoje letno poročilo, ki vsebuje finančna poročila za vse odprte sporazume med agencijo in Komisijo.
After all projects funded from the budget of a given year have been closed, the National agency submits a consolidated final report to the Commission as part of the Yearly National Agency Report concerned. 
Ko so zaključeni vsi projekti, financirani iz proračuna za dano leto, nacionalna agencija Komisiji predloži konsolidirano končno poročilo kot del letnega poročila zadevne nacionalne agencije.
The Commission closes the agreement with the Agency by approving the report, calculating the final balance and making the settlement payment or recovery. 
Komisija zaključi sporazum z agencijo tako, da potrdi poročilo, izračuna končni znesek za poravnavo in izplača preostala sredstva ali izterja preplačilo.
Audit scope and approach 7.6. TheCourt’soverallauditapproachandmethodologyis described in Part 2 of Annex 1.1. For the audit of Education and Citizenship, the following specific points should be noted: (a) a sample of 120 closures of programmes and projects at Commission level was tested of which 78 related to the closure of programmes and projects for the 2000 to 2006 period; (b) a sample of 30 advances paid in 2009 was tested separately; (c) the assessment of systems was focused on systems for closures of programmes and projects made by the Commission; (d) the annual activity reports and accompanying declarations for DGs EAC and JLS were assessed. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 7.6 Skupnipristopinmetodologija,kijujeRačunsko sodišče uporabilo pri reviziji, sta opisana v delu 2 Priloge 1.1. Revizija področja izobraževanje in državljanstvo je zaje­ mala: (a) preizkušanje vzorca s 120 zaključevanji programov in projektov na ravni Komisije, od katerih se jih je 78 nana­ šalo na zaključevanje programov in projektov za obdobje 2000–2006; (b) ločeno preizkušanje vzorca s 30 predplačili, izplačanimi v letu 2009; (c) oceno sistemov, usmerjeno na sisteme za zaključevanje programov in projektov na ravni Komisije; (d) oceno letnih poročil o dejavnostih in spremljajočih izjav za GD EAC in GD JLS.
The Yearly National Agency Reports allow the Commission to have a full overview on a yearly basis of the state of implemen­ tation of the programme and the management and controls carried out by the National Agencies. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 7.5 Letna poročila nacionalnih agencij Komisiji omogočajo dober pregled na letni ravni nad stanjem izvajanja programa ter upravlja­ njem in kontrolami, ki jih izvajajo nacionalne agencije.
The information contained in the Yearly National Agency Reports is certified each year by the National Authority of the country concerned in the framework of its Declaration of Assurance to the Commission. _____________ (2) Participating organisations are usually universities, schools or colleges, who manage payments to beneficiaries such as students or teachers. 
Podatke iz letnih poročil nacionalnih agencij vsako leto potrdi nacio­ nalni organ zadevne države v okviru svoje izjave o zanesljivosti Komisiji. _____________ (2) Sodelujoče organizacije so običajno univerze, šole ali fakultete, ki upravljajo plačila upravičencem, kot so študenti ali učitelji.
7.6. (a) The benefit of the current generation of programmes 2007-2013 with simplified rules and extensive use of lump sum financing should reduce the risks linked to final payments. 
7.6 (a) Koristi sedanje generacije programov za obdobje 2007–2013 s poenostavljenimi pravili in razširjeno uporabo financiranja s povprečninami bi morale zmanjšati tveganja, povezana s konč­ nimi plačili.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 165 T H E C O U R T ' S O B S E R VA T I O N S 7.7. For DAS 2009 the Court has focused the audit on the underlying expenditure incurred and approved by the Commission. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 165 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 7.7 Sodišče je revizijo za DAS za leto 2009 usmerilo na s tem povezane odhodke, ki jih je imela in odobrila Komisija.
This audit included on-the-spot visits to final beneficiaries such as state border guards in Member States, refugee centres, cultural institutes and universities adminis­ tering payments to students and teachers in order to assess the correct calculation and compliance with the relevant rules and regulations for the expenditure. 
Med revizijo so bili izvedeni obiski na kraju samem pri končnih upravičencih, kot so organi za nadzor meje v državah članicah, begunski centri ter kulturne ustanove in univerze, ki upravljajo plačila študentom in učiteljem, da bi se ocenili pravilnost izračunavanja odhodkov ter njihova skladnost s predpisi in uredbami, ki veljajo zanje.
The audit of a sample of transactions underpinning closures provides a fuller picture of the financial management at Commission and Member State level in this policy group than would be obtained by examining a large number of advances, for which the risk of error is very low (based on the Court’s previous audits) as at the point of closure it becomes clear whether expenditure has been incurred in accordance with the conditions of the scheme concerned. 
Revizija vzorca transakcij, povezanih z zaključevanji, nudi celovitejšo sliko finančnega poslovodenja na ravni Komisije in držav članic v tej skupini politik, kot bi jo preučitev velikega števila predplačil, pri katerih je tveganje napake zelo majhno (kot so pokazale prejšnje revizije Sodišča, saj se šele ob zaključevanju pokaže, ali so odhodki nastali v skladu s pogoji zadevne sheme).
As such, the audit approach differs from last year and the results are therefore not directly comparable. 
Revi­ zijski pristop je drugačen kot lani, zato rezultati niso nepo­ sredno primerljivi.
7.8. Duetothemulti-stageclosureprocess,underlying expenditure at the level of final beneficiaries may only be considered for approval by the Commission several years after the initial contracts have been signed. 
7.8 Ker poteka postopek zaključevanja v več stopnjah, lahko Komisija obdela in odobri s tem povezane odhodke na ravni končnih upravičencev šele več let po podpisu izvirnih pogodb.
In the sample of Commission settlements made in 2009, many underlying transactions concern projects initiated in 2004 and 2005. 
Številne transakcije v vzorcu poravnav, ki jih je Komi­ sija izvršila v letu 2009, so povezane s projekti, ki so se začeli v letih 2004 in 2005.
The projects therefore relate to the 2000-2006 programming period. 
Projekti se torej nanašajo na programsko obdobje 2000–2006.
For the 2007-2013 period expenditure new funding rules and control systems were introduced. 
Za odhodke za obdobje 2007–2013 so bili uvedeni novi predpisi za financiranje in novi kontrolni sistemi.
The related closures will occur in later years. 
S tem povezana zaključevanja bodo izvršena v poznejših letih.
7.10. Advancepaymentsaccountfor87%ofthetotal payments made in the Education and Citizenship policy group. 
7.10 Predplačila predstavljajo 87 % vseh izvršenih plačil v skupini politik izobraževanje in državljanstvo.
The Court examined a random sample of 30 advances paid during 2009. 
Sodišče je preučilo naključni vzorec s 30 predplačili, izplačanimi v letu 2009.
The combined value of these advances was 410 million euro, equivalent to 22 % of the total expenditure by way of advances booked to the accounts. Advance payments were found to be free from material error. 
Njihova skupna vrednost je znašala 410 milijonov EUR, kar je 22 % vseh odhodkov, vknjiženih kot predplačila. Sodišče je ugotovilo, da v predplačilih ni bilo pomembnih napak.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ' S R E P L I E S 7.7. The Commission notes that the Court’s sample for the DAS 2009 consists of 120 closure payments and 30 advances, while 87 % of payment amounts for the whole policy group are advances (see Table 7.1). 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 7.7 Komisija opaža, da vzorec Sodišča za izjavo o zanesljivosti za leto 2009 sestavlja 120 zaključnih plačil in 30 predplačil, medtem ko je 87 % zneskov plačil za vso skupino politike predplačil (glej tabelo 7.1).
7.8. The Commission stresses that the current management and control system relies on a stable network of National Agencies that are closely supervised both at national and EU levels. 
7.8 Komisija poudarja, da trenutni sistem upravljanja in kontrol temelji na stabilni mreži nacionalnih agencij, ki so tesno nadzorovane na nacionalni ravni ter na ravni EU.
This means that the closure of financial agreements between the Agencies and the Commission is not a particular risk factor, as there is a solid system of yearly reporting, whereby the Commission monitors budget implementation by the Agencies on a yearly basis. 
To pomeni, da zaključevanje finančnih sporazumov med agencijami in Komisijo ni pomemben rizični faktor, saj obstaja trden sistem letnega poročanja, pri katerem Komisija vsako leto spremlja, kako agencije izvršujejo proračun.
In case of problems noted during this yearly review, the Commission can and does already intervene with the National Agency and National Authority well before the closure of the financial agreement concerned (cf. financial assessment feedback provided in the evaluation conclusions letter at the end of the yearly desk review). 7.9. 
V primeru težav, ugotovljenih med tem letnim pregledom, lahko Komi­ sija posreduje pri nacionalni agenciji in nacionalnem organu, kar počne že pred zaključkom zadevnega finančnega sporazuma (glej povratne informacije o finančni oceni, zagotovljene v dopisu o zaključkih evalvacij na koncu letnega dokumentacijskega pregleda).
The apparent deterioration in the proportion of the trans­ actions affected by errors in 2009 is explained by the change in approach of the Court which focuses mainly on closures. 
7.9 Očitno poslabšanje v deležu transakcij z napakami v letu 2009 se lahko pojasni s spremenjenim pristopom Sodišča, ki se osredotoča predvsem na zaključevanja.
7.10. The Commission welcomes the fact that the Court found no errors in the advance payments. 
7.10 Komisijo veseli dejstvo, da Sodišče ni ugotovilo nobenih napak glede predplačil.
7.11. The Commission notes that the error rate for closures slightly exceeds 2 %. 
7.11 Komisija ugotavlja, da stopnja napak za zaključevanja rahlo presega 2 %.
The most common type of quantifiable error found was errors of eligibility; see example (c). 
Najpogostejša vrsta količinsko opredeljivih napak so bile napake v zvezi z upravičenostjo; glej primer (c).
Examples of quantifiable errors include: (a) Students paid for incorrect durations of student mobility periods (accuracy) In 7 of the 36 DG EAC Socrates II transactions audited (20 %), the majority of which were payments to universities who disburse funds for Erasmus study periods, cases were found where students were paid for longer stays than were actually completed. (b) Costs not supported by invoices or proof of payment (occurrence) For a DG JLS Daphne II (3) project, costs claimed included unsubstantiated travel and subsistence cost. 
Med primeri količinsko opredeljivih napak so: (a) Študentje so bili plačani za nepravilna obdobja študentske mobil­ nosti (točnost) V 7 od 36 revidiranih transakcij (20 %) za Socrates II, za katerega je odgovoren GD EAC, ki so bile večinoma plačila univerzam, ki razdeljujejo sredstva za študijska obdobja Erasmus, so bili ugotovljeni primeri, ko so študentje prejeli plačilo za daljše obdobje, kot so ga dejansko preživeli na izmenjavi. (b) Za stroške ni bilo računov ali dokazil o plačilu (nastanek) Med stroški za projekt Daphne II (3) v pristojnosti GD JLS, za katere je bil vložen zahtevek za povračilo, so bili tudi neutemeljeni potni stroški in dnevnice.
The errors found represented 10 % of the declared costs. (c) Declaration of ineligible costs (eligibility) In one DG EAC Youth exchange project audited, 27 out of 48 participants were above the maximum age permitted, without any justification given. 
Ugotovljene napake so predstavljale 10 % prijavljenih stroškov. (c) Prijavljanje neupravičenih stroškov (upravičenost) V enem od revidiranih projektov izmenjave v okviru programa GD EAC Mladi v akciji je bilo 27 od 48 udele­ žencev starejših od najvišje dovoljene starosti, ne da bi bilo to kakor koli utemeljeno.
This led to ineligible travel, visa and activity costs amounting to 12 460 euro (37 % of declared costs). 
To je povzročilo neupravičene stroške za potovanja, vizume in dejavnosti v višini 12 460 EUR (37 % prijavljenih stroškov).
For other projects found to contain errors and audited under DG EAC Youth in Action, error rates ranged from 1 % to 13 %. 
Pri drugih projektih, v katerih so bile ugotovljene napake in so bili revidirani v okviru programa GD EAC Mladi v akciji, je stopnja napake znašala od 1 % do 13 %.
7.13. Furthermore,38transactions(32%)containednon-quantifiable errors, some of which indicate weaknesses in systems at Commission level. 
7.13 Polegtegaje38transakcij(32%)vsebovalokoličinsko neopredeljive napake in nekatere od teh kažejo na slabosti v sistemih na ravni Komisije.
For example, there were five cases of late approval by the Commission of final reports, one in DG JLS, one in EACEA and three in DG EAC, ranging from 87 days to more than two years after the deadline. 
Komisija je v petih primerih na primer pozno potrdila končna poročila, in sicer enega v GD JLS, enega v EACEA in tri v GD EAC, zamuda pa je znašala od 87 dni do več kot dve leti po roku.
The results of the examination of systems are summarised in Annex 7.2 for Education and Citizenship. _____________ (3) Programme to combat violence against children, young people and T H E C O M M I S S I O N ' S R E P L I E S 7.12. 
USPEŠNOST SISTEMOV 7.14 Rezultati preverjanja sistemov za izobraževanje in državljanstvo so povzeti v Prilogi 7.2. _____________ (3) Program za boj proti nasilju nad otroki, mladimi in ženskami.
The Commission will follow up the errors found by the Court, and where appropriate, funds unduly paid will be recovered. (a) The Commission stresses that the findings of the Court relate to Socrates II transactions covering grants to higher education insti­ tutions for the academic years 2004/2005, 2005/2006 and 2006/2007. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 7.12 Komisija bo sprejela ustrezne nadaljnje ukrepe za napake, ki jih je odkrilo Sodišče, in po potrebi bodo neupravičeno izplačana sredstva izterjana. (a) Komisija poudarja, da se ugotovitve Sodišča nanašajo na transa­ kcije programa Socrates II v zvezi z donacijami visokošolskim ustanovam za šolska leta 2004/2005, 2005/2006 in 2006/ 2007.
With the introduction of the Lifelong Learning Programme, the Commission has stepped up the guidance and support to National Agencies in order to ensure sound management of EU funds both at the level of the National Agencies and the beneficiaries and to establish a proper audit trail at all levels. (b) The Commission will follow up and recover any undue payments in relation to the Daphne file. (c) Under the former Youth Programme which was audited by the Court, the eligibility criteria offered a certain flexibility. 
Z uvedbo programa vseživljenjskega učenja je Komisija pripravila natančnejša navodila za nacionalne agencije in njihovo podporo, da bi zagotovila dobro upravljanje sredstev EU tako na ravni nacionalnih agencij kot na ravni upravičencev ter da bi na vseh ravneh vzpostavila primerno revizijsko sled. (b) Komisija bo sprejela nadaljnje ukrepe in izterjala vsa neupra­ vičena plačila v zvezi s spisom Daphne. (c) V okviru prejšnjega programa Mladina, ki ga je revidiralo Sodišče, so merila za upravičenost omogočala določeno prilag­ odljivost.
The eligibility criteria have been made stricter under the current Youth in Action Programme. 
V okviru sedanjega programa „Mladi v akciji“ so merila za upravičenost postala strožja.