natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cohesion policy is implemented under shared management1, which means that responsibility for implementing the policy and the related funds, including the control activities, is shared between the Commission and the Member States. 
Kohezijska politika se izvaja z deljenim upravljanjem1, kar pomeni, da si odgovornost za izvajanje politike in izvrševanje sredstev iz zadevnih skladov, vključno z opravljanjem kontrolnih dejavnosti, delijo Komisija in države članice.
Although the Commission remains responsible for the implementation of the EU budget, the actual management and control of EU funds and programmes is delegated to the Member State authorities. 
Komisija sicer ostaja odgovorna za izvrševanje proračuna EU, dejansko upravljanje in kontrole skladov in programov EU pa so preneseni na organe držav članic.
1 13 Article 59 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 
1 12 Člen 59 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št.
The tasks of these authorities are defined in sectoral regulations: (a) managing authorities (whose tasks can be delegated to intermediate bodies) carry out the day‐to‐day management of projects co‐financed under the respective operational programme (OP), (b) certifying authorities aggregate cost declarations prepared by project beneficiaries into statements of expenditure and declare them to the Commission for reimbursement, and (c) audit authorities perform a yearly independent audit of the costs declared to the Commission and of the functioning of the management and control system. 
Naloge teh organov so določene v sektorskih uredbah: (a) organi upravljanja (ki lahko svoje naloge prenesejo na posredniške organe) opravljajo tekoče vodenje projektov, ki so sofinancirani v okviru ustreznega operativnega programa (OP), (b) organi za potrjevanje združijo prijave stroškov, ki jih pripravijo upravičenci, v izkaze odhodkov, ki jih predložijo Komisiji za povračilo, (c) revizijski organi opravijo letno neodvisno revizijo stroškov, prijavljenih Komisiji, in revizijo delovanja sistema upravljanja in kontrole.
In particular, these authorities select projects, distribute and control funds. 
Ti organi zlasti izbirajo projekte ter dodeljujejo in kontrolirajo sredstva.
Member States are also responsible for ensuring that the expenditure subject to reimbursement from the EU budget is free from irregularities through the prevention, detection and correction of irregularities2. At the same time the Commission may take actions to recover funds that have been unduly paid. 
Države članice s preprečevanjem, ugotavljanjem in popravljanjem nepravilnosti zagotavljajo, da so odhodki, ki se povrnejo iz proračuna EU, pravilni.2 Komisija lahko sredstva, ki so bila neupravičeno izplačana, tudi izterja.
Project beneficiaries incur expenditure and declare them in payment claims to managing authorities (or intermediate bodies). 
Upravičenci nastale odhodke prijavijo v zahtevkih za plačilo, ki jih predložijo organom upravljanja (ali posredniškim organom).
These are then aggregated and sent through the certifying authority to the Commission. 
Zahtevki se nato združijo, organ za potrjevanje pa jih pošlje Komisiji.
The Commission then pays the amount equalling the 2 Articles 38 and 39 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 
2 13 Člena 38 in 39 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1260/1999 z dne 21. junija 1999 o splošnih določbah o Strukturnih skladih (UL L 161, 26.6.1999, str.
1), Articles 70 and 98 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 
1), člena 70 in 98 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št.
25), Articles 122 and 143 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
25), člena 122 in 143 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo, o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
320), Article 53b of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 
1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
1) and Article 59 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012. 
1) in člen 59 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št.
The Commission negotiates and approves operational programmes with Member States, provides guidance and instructions to Member State authorities on carrying out their tasks and performs Member State level or desk checks to control the implementation of the policy. 
Komisija se pogaja z državami članicam in odobri njihove operativne programe, organom držav članic daje smernice in navodila za izvajanje njihovih nalog, izvajanje politike pa kontrolira s pregledi na ravni držav članic ali dokumentacijskimi pregledi.
Figure 1 – Management and financial flow of cohesion policy Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Slika 1 – Upravljanje in finančni tokovi na področju kohezijske politike Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Overall, there were 618 OPs and 1119 CF projects for the 2000-2006 programme period3, 440 OPs for the 2007-2013 period and 391 OPs (ERDF, CF, ESF or multi-fund) for the 2014-2020 period. 
Skupaj je bilo v programskem obdobju 2000–20063 618 operativnih programov in 1119 projektov Kohezijskega sklada, v obdobju 2007–2013 440 operativnih programov, v obdobju 2014–2020 pa 391 operativnih programov (v okviru ESRR, Kohezijskega sklada, ESS ali več skladov).
3 While in the 2000-2006 programme period CF was implemented through projects directly approved by the Commission, in the 2007-2013 programme period they were integrated into OPs. 
3 14 V programskem obdobju 2000–2006 so se sredstva Kohezijskega sklada izvrševala v okviru projektov, ki jih je neposredno odobrila Komisija, v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 pa so bili projekti vključeni v operativne programe.
The Commission’s measures to protect the EU budget in Cohesion 10. 
Ukrepi Komisije za zaščito proračuna EU na področju kohezije 10.
The Commission’s measures to protect the EU budget aim to ensure that only regular spending (i.e. expenditure which is spent in accordance with the applicable EU and national/regional legislation) is co‐financed from the EU budget. 
Namen ukrepov Komisije za zaščito proračuna EU je zagotoviti, da se iz proračuna EU financira samo pravilna poraba (tj. le odhodki, ki se porabijo v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo EU in nacionalno/regionalno zakonodajo).
It is the Member States’ responsibility to detect, correct and prevent errors in the first instance4. If the Commission finds out that irregular expenditure was co‐financed or likely to be co‐financed, the Commission can intervene and correct already co‐financed expenditure or can prevent the future co‐financing of irregular expenditure in future statements of expenditure. 
Za odkrivanje, popravljanje in preprečevanje napak so na prvi stopnji odgovorne države članice.4 Če Komisija ugotovi, da so bili ali bi lahko bili sofinancirani nepravilni odhodki, lahko ukrepa in popravi že sofinancirane odhodke ali prepreči prihodnje sofinanciranje nepravilnih odhodkov v prihodnjih izkazih odhodkov.
The regulations for the 2000‐20065, as well as those for the 2007‐20136 and 2014‐20207 periods, enable the Commission to apply preventive measures, i.e. payment interruptions and suspensions, and financial corrections. 
Na podlagi uredb za obdobje 2000−20065 in tudi za obdobji 2007–20136 in 2014–20207 ima Komisija možnost izvesti preventivne ukrepe, tj. prekinitve in začasne ustavitve plačil, ter finančne popravke.
For the 2000‐2006 period, the regulations did not provide for interruptions as part of the Commission’s preventive measures. 
V uredbah za obdobje 2000−2006 prekinitve plačil niso bile predvidene kot del preventivnih ukrepov Komisije.
The Directorates‐General for Regional and Urban Policy and for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion are responsible for the application of these corrective measures in cohesion policy. 
Za izvedbo teh popravljalnih ukrepov na področju kohezijske politike sta odgovorna Generalni direktorat za regionalno in mestno politiko ter Generalni direktorat za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje.
The Commission can apply preventive measures and/or financial corrections on the basis of irregularities or serious deficiencies identified by Member State authorities (e.g. the managing or audit authority) or on the basis of its own verifications and audits. 
Komisija lahko preventivne ukrepe in/ali finančne popravke izvede na podlagi nepravilnosti ali hudih pomanjkljivosti, ki so jih ugotovili organi držav članic (npr. organ upravljanja ali revizijski organ), ali na podlagi lastnih preverjanj in revizij.
This also includes OLAF investigations. 
To zajema tudi preiskave urada OLAF.
They can also be the result of audits by the European Court of Auditors (see Annex I). 
Izvede jih lahko tudi na podlagi revizij Evropskega računskega sodišča (glej Prilogo I).
Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999. 
Člen 39 Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999.
Articles 91, 92 and 99 to 102 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Členi 91, 92 in 99 do 102 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
Articles 83, 85, 142 and 144 to 147 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
Členi 83, 85, 142 in 144 do 147 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
Preventive measures: payment interruptions and suspensions 14. 
Preventivni ukrepi: prekinitve in začasne ustavitve plačil 14.
Preventive measures result in a deferral of payments from the EU budget. 
Posledica preventivnih ukrepov je odlog plačil iz proračuna EU.
This puts additional pressure on the Member State to take the necessary corrective action. 
Države članice so tako pod dodatnim pritiskom, da sprejmejo potrebne popravljalne ukrepe.
The main types of preventive measures are interruptions and suspensions (see Box 1). 
Glavni vrsti preventivnih ukrepov sta prekinitev in začasna ustavitev plačil (glej okvir 1).
Payment interruptions were introduced in the 2007‐2013 regulation (see Annex II). 
Prekinitve plačil so bile uvedene z uredbo za obdobje 2007–2013 (glej Prilogo II).
The main advantage of interruptions is that they can be applied immediately without a long administrative procedure if the Commission has evidence suggesting significant 8 9 10 11 17 Box 1 – Interruptions and suspensions of payments from the EU budget In principle, the Commission must make the payment to the Member State within two months of having received the payment claim. 
Glavna prednost prekinitev plačil je, da jih je mogoče izvesti takoj, brez dolgotrajnega upravnega postopka, če ima Komisija dokaze, ki kažejo na pomembne pomanjkljivosti12. Za izvedbo 8 9 10 11 12 16 Okvir 1 – Prekinitev in začasna ustavitev plačil iz proračuna EU Načeloma mora Komisija plačilo državi članici izvršiti v dveh mesecih po prejemu zahtevka za plačilo.
The Commission may however interrupt8 the payment deadline for a maximum of six months if there is evidence to suggest a significant deficiency in the functioning of the management and control system of the Member State9; or if the Commission has to carry out additional verifications following the receipt of information that uncorrected irregular expenditure has been certified in a statement of expenditure. 
Komisija pa lahko rok plačila prekine8 za največ šest mesecev, če obstajajo dokazi, ki kažejo na pomembne pomanjkljivostih v delovanju sistema upravljanja in kontrole države članice,9 ali če mora Komisija po prejemu informacij, da so bili v izkazu odhodkov potrjeni nepravilni odhodki, ki niso bili popravljeni, opraviti dodatna preverjanja.
The Commission may suspend10 an interim payment or a part of it, if there is evidence of a serious deficiency in the management and control system, which was not corrected by the Member State; or in case irregular uncorrected expenditure linked to a serious irregularity has been declared in a certified statement of expenditure; or in case there has been a serious breach by a Member State of its management and control obligations. 
Komisija lahko začasno ustavi10 vmesno plačilo ali njegov del, če obstajajo dokazi o resnih pomanjkljivostih v sistemu upravljanja in kontrole, ki jih država članica ni popravila; ali če so bili v potrjenem izkazu odhodkov prijavljeni nepravilni odhodki, povezani z resno nepravilnostjo, ki niso bili popravljeni; ali če država članica huje krši svoje upravljavske in kontrolne obveznosti.
The suspension is preceded by a pre‐suspension11, through which the Commission informs the Member State of deficiencies found. 
Pred začasno ustavitvijo plačil se uvede predhodna začasna ustavitev11, s katero Komisija obvesti državo članico o odkritih pomanjkljivostih.
The aim of the pre‐suspension is to give the Member State the possibility to address the deficiencies and the right to be heard before a suspension is decided upon. 
Namen predhodne začasne ustavitve plačil je dati državi članici možnost, da odpravi pomanjkljivosti, in zagotoviti spoštovanje načela kontradiktornosti, preden se sprejme odločitev o začasni ustavitvi.
Article 91 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Člen 91 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
This is particularly relevant when the Member State’s audit authority sends its annual control report containing its audit findings to the Commission at year end. 
To je pomembno zlasti takrat, kadar revizijski organ države članice Komisiji pošlje svoje letno poročilo o nadzoru, v katerem so navedene ugotovitve revizij, ob koncu leta.
Article 92 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Člen 92 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
To apply a suspension, however, a serious deficiency needs to be established resulting in prior longer procedure (see Box 1). 
17 začasne ustavitve plačil pa je treba resno pomanjkljivost dokazati v predhodnem daljšem postopku (glej okvir 1).
If there is no payment claim pending (i.e. there is no payment deadline to be interrupted), the Commission may also issue a warning. 
Če ni nobenega odprtega zahtevka za plačilo (tj. ni roka plačila, ki bi ga bilo mogoče prekiniti), lahko Komisija izda tudi opozorilo.
The Commission warns the Member State that if a payment application has been submitted, its payment deadline will be interrupted. 
Komisija opozori državo članico, da bo v primeru predložitve vloge za plačilo prekinila plačilni rok.
This procedure is, however, not set out in the regulations. 
Vendar ta postopek ni določen v uredbah.
Suspensions are applied by a legally binding Commission decision addressed to the Member State concerned. 
Začasna ustavitev plačil se uvede s pravno zavezujočim sklepom Komisije, naslovljenim na zadevno državo članico.
All other preventive measures (warning, interruption, pre‐ suspension) take the form of a letter signed by a director‐general of the Commission (acting in its capacity as Authorising Officer by Delegation) and addressed to Member State authorities. 
Vsi drugi preventivni ukrepi (opozorilo, prekinitev, predhodna začasna ustavitev plačil) so v obliki dopisa, ki ga podpiše generalni direktor generalnega direktorata Komisije (v svoji funkciji odredbodajalca na podlagi prenosa pooblastil) in je naslovljen na organe držav članic.
Financial corrections by the Commission 18. 
Finančni popravki Komisije 18.
Where serious deficiencies in the Member State management and control systems have led to systemic errors or the Commission has identified an individual irregularity, the Commission can also apply financial corrections (see Annex I)13. The purpose of financial corrections is to restore a situation where all of the expenditure declared for co‐financing from the ERDF, CF or ESF and reimbursed by the Commission is in line with the applicable rules14. 19. 
Kadar hude pomanjkljivosti v sistemih upravljanja in kontrole držav članic privedejo do sistemskih napak ali Komisija odkrije posamezno nepravilnost, lahko Komisija prav tako izvede finančne popravke (glej Prilogo I).13 Namen finančnih popravkov je, da se ponovno vzpostavi stanje, v katerem so vsi odhodki, ki so bili prijavljeni za sofinanciranje iz ESRR, Kohezijskega sklada ali ESS in jih je Komisija povrnila, skladni z veljavnimi pravili.14 19.
During the 2000‐2006 and 2007‐2013 programme periods, Member States were able to replace irregular expenditure with new expenditure if they took the necessary corrective actions and applied the related financial correction (confirmed financial correction)15. This 12 13 14 15 18 Article 91 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. Articles 99 to 102 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
V programskih obdobjih 2000–2006 in 2007–2013 so lahko države članice nepravilne odhodke nadomestile z novimi odhodki, če so izvedle potrebne popravljalne ukrepe in s tem povezane finančne popravke (potrjeni finančni popravki).15 Ta možnost je predvidena tudi za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.16 Ali se je to zgodilo v praksi, pa je bilo odvisno od tega, ali 13 14 15 16 Členi 99 do 102 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
Paragraph 1.2 of C(2011) 7321 Commission decision of 19.10.2011 on the approval of guidelines on the principles, criteria and indicative scales to be applied in respect of financial corrections made by the Commission under Articles 99 and 100 of Council Regulation (EC) N 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006. 
Odstavek 1.2 Sklepa Komisije C(2011) 7321 z dne 19. oktobra 2011 o odobritvi smernic v zvezi z načeli, merili in okvirnimi lestvicami, ki se uporabljajo v zvezi s finančnimi popravki, ki jih izvede Komisija v skladu s členoma 99 in 100 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006.
Articles 38 and 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 and Articles 98.2 and 100.4 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
1260/1999 ter člena 98(2) in 100(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
Whether this happened in practice depended, however, on the Member State’s ability to declare additional (regular) expenditure. 
1303/2013. je bila država članica zmožna prijaviti dodatne (redne) odhodke.
If the Member State did not have such additional expenditure to declare, the financial correction resulted in a net correction (loss of funding). 
Če država članica ni imela dodatnih odhodkov, ki bi jih lahko prijavila, je finančni popravek privedel do neto popravka (izgube sredstev).
In contrast, a Commission financial correction decision had always a direct and net impact on the Member State: it had to pay the amount back and its envelope was reduced (i.e. the Member State could spend less money throughout the programme period). 
Nasprotno pa je imel sklep Komisije o finančnem popravku vedno neposreden in neto učinek na državo članico: ta je morala znesek vrniti, njena skupna sredstva pa so se zmanjšala (tj. država članica je v celotnem programskem obdobju mogla porabiti manj denarja).
The Commission does not address financial corrections to beneficiaries directly, but to Member State authorities managing the OPs. 
Komisija finančnih popravkov ne naslovi neposredno na upravičence, temveč na organe držav članic, ki upravljajo operativne programe.
Should a financial correction relate to individual projects implemented by beneficiaries, it is the Member State authorities who must process the financial correction towards the beneficiary. 
Če se finančni popravek nanaša na določen projekt, ki ga izvajajo upravičenci, morajo finančni popravek na upravičenca prenesti organi države članice.
Annex III provides an overview of the different scenarios concerning the impact of the financial corrections on Member States up to the end of the 2007‐2013 programme period. 
Priloga III vsebuje pregled različnih scenarijev v zvezi z učinkom finančnih popravkov na države članice do konca programskega obdobja 2007–2013.
Determining the amount of financial corrections 22. 
Določitev zneska finančnih popravkov 22.
The Commission can determine the amount of a financial correction in different ways (see Box 2). 
Komisija lahko znesek finančnega popravka določi na različne načine (glej okvir 2).
Box 2 ‐ Individual, flat rate and extrapolated financial corrections The Commission has established three different ways to determine the amount of a financial correction17: (a) The amount of a financial correction is assessed based on individual cases and equals the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the EU budget (individual correction). (b) When it is not possible or not cost‐effective to calculate the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the EU budget precisely, a flat rate correction may be applied based on pre‐set criteria and scales. 
Okvir 2 – Individualni, pavšalni in ekstrapolirani finančni popravki Komisija je opredelila tri različne načine za določitev zneska finančnega popravka.17 (a) Znesek finančnega popravka se oceni na podlagi individualnih primerov in je enak znesku odhodkov, ki so bili napačno zaračunani proračunu EU (individualni popravek). (b) Kadar natančen izračun zneska, ki je bil napačno zaračunan proračunu EU, ni mogoč ali ni stroškovno učinkovit, se lahko na podlagi vnaprej določenih meril in lestvic določijo pavšalni popravki.
This means that the amount to be corrected for all affected cases is estimated based on a small number of cases examined. 
To pomeni, da se znesek, ki ga je treba popraviti v vseh primerih z nepravilnostmi, oceni na podlagi majhnega števila primerov, ki se preučijo.
If the irregular expenditure leading to the financial correction has already been claimed for reimbursement from the EU budget, the financial correction corrects the past (ex‐post financial correction). 
Če so bili za nepravilne odhodke, ki so privedli do finančnega popravka, že vloženi zahtevki za povračilo iz proračuna EU, se finančni popravek nanaša na preteklost (naknadni finančni popravek).
However, if the irregular expenditure had not yet been claimed for reimbursement from the EU budget, the financial correction addresses the future (ex‐ante financial correction). 
Če pa za nepravilne odhodke še niso bili vloženi zahtevki za povračilo iz proračuna EU, se finančni popravek nanaša na prihodnost (predhodni finančni popravek).
This latter means that already when declaring expenditure to the Commission, Member States deduct from eligible expenditure the financial correction. 
To pomeni, da države članice že ob prijavi odhodkov Komisiji od upravičenih odhodkov odštejejo finančni popravek.
Ex‐ ante and ex‐post financial corrections can occur simultaneously within the same case ensuring the correction of the past and the future. 
Predhodni in naknadni finančni popravki se lahko v istem primeru pojavijo istočasno ter tako popravljajo nepravilnosti iz preteklosti in prihodnosti.
Annex I describes the process leading to a preventive measure and/or financial correction and its resolution. 
V Prilogi I je opisan proces, ki pripelje do preventivnega ukrepa in/ali finančnega popravka in njegove rešitve.