natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission has verified that the measure and objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely to the extent possible during the procedure of the programmes’ approval. 
Komisija je med postopkom odobritve programa potrdila, da so ukrep in cilji specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, stvarni in časovno opredeljeni, kolikor je to mogoče.
While agri-environment sub-measures can also address environmental potentials and opportunities, and while environmental pressures can be addressed by agri-environment sub-measures and/or other rural development measures, there is a clear link between environmental pressures and agri-environment sub-measures. 
Čeprav lahko kmetijsko-okoljski podukrepi obravnavajo tudi okoljske potenciale in priložnosti in se lahko pritiski na okolje obravnavajo s kmetijsko-okoljskimi podukrepi in/ali drugimi ukrepi za razvoj podeželja, obstaja jasna povezava med pritiski na okolje in kmetijsko-okoljskimi podukrepi.
The mid-term evaluation (MTE) reports, submitted at the end of 2010, provide the first opportunity for the impact of rural development programmes (RDP), including agri-environment schemes, to be assessed. 
Vmesna ocenjevalna poročila, predložena konec leta 2010, zagotavljajo prvo priložnost za oceno učinka programov razvoja podeželja, vključno s kmetijsko-okoljskimi shemami.
However, the implementation and expected results of axis 2 measures are monitored and reported to the Commission in the Annual Progress Reports. 
Vendar se izvajanje in pričakovane rezultate ukrepov 2. osi spremlja in o njih poroča Komisiji v letnih poročilih o napredku.
See also the replies to points 47 and 91. 
Glej tudi odgovor na točki 47 in 91.
Recommendation 1 — First indent The Commission will further underline the need for Member States to ensure consistency of the sub-measures’ objectives with the general agri-environmental objectives. 
Priporočilo 1 – prva alinea Komisija bo še naprej poudarjala potrebo, da države članice zagotovijo skladnost ciljev podukrepov s splošnimi kmetijsko-okoljskimi cilji.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Recommendation 1 — Second indent The Commission agrees that the link between environmental pressures and agri-environment must be clearly established. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Priporočilo 1 – druga alinea Komisija se strinja, da mora biti povezava med pritiski na okolje in kmetijsko-okoljskimi ukrepi jasno določena.
Nevertheless, the maintenance of environmental potentials and opportunities is also considered as a valid justification for agri-environment payments. The character of the link to the environmental pressures it responds to can usually be inferred from a sub-measure’s content and thus need not be spelled out. 
Kljub temu se ohranjanje okoljskih potencialov in priložnosti prav tako šteje za veljavno utemeljitev za kmetijsko-okoljska plačila Narava povezave s pritiski na okolje, na katere se odzivajo kmetijsko-okoljski podukrepi, se običajno lahko izlušči iz vsebine podukrepa in je zato ni treba posebej navesti.
Other alternative policies complement agri-environment measures. 
Kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dopolnjujejo druge alternativne politike.
In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States are free to decide whether to use agri-environment and/or other alternative policies to achieve the expected environmental results. 
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti se lahko države članice same odločijo, ali bodo za dosego pričakovanih okoljskih rezultatov uporabile kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe in/ali druge alternativne politike.
Good practices are a focal point of all European Network for Rural Development (EN RD) actions and disseminated through the various publications issued and seminars organised. 
Osrednja točka vseh ukrepov Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja (EN RD) so dobre prakse, ki se razširjajo preko različnih izdanih publikacij in organiziranih seminarjev.
Member States can also disseminate best practices by training and farm advisory service measures. 
Države članice lahko dobre prakse razširjajo tudi z ukrepi usposabljanja in ukrepi v zvezi s storitvami kmetijskega svetovanja.
The calculation of aid amounts is the responsibility of the Member States and is certified by an independent body. 
Izračun zneska pomoči je odgovornost držav članic, potrdi pa jih neodvisni organ.
In cases of doubts concerning aid amounts proposed, Member States were asked to provide detailed information on the underlying calculations and revise them, if necessary. 
V primerih dvomov glede predlaganih zneskov pomoči so bile države članice pozvane, da predložijo podrobne informacije glede osnovnega izračuna in jih po potrebi popravijo.
Special Report No 7/2011 – Is agri-environment support well designed and managed? 
Posebno poročilo št. 7/2011 – Ali je podpora za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe dobro pripravljena in upravljana?
74 Recommendation 2 The Commission agrees with this recommendation, as it reflects the current legal framework. 
74 Priporočilo 2 Komisija se strinja s tem priporočilom, saj odraža veljavni pravni okvir.
The Commission verifies whether all elements of the calculations as required by the legal framework are provided in the programmes and performs a plausibility check. 
Komisija preveri, ali so v programih zagotovljeni vsi elementi izračunov, kot jih zahteva pravni okvir, in izvede preverjanje verodostojnosti.
In cases of doubt concerning aid amounts proposed, Member States are asked to provide detailed information on the underlying calculations and revise them, if necessary. 
V primerih dvomov glede predlaganih zneskov pomoči so države članice pozvane, da predložijo podrobne informacije glede osnovnega izračuna in jih po potrebi popravijo.
Calculations of aid amounts may be differentiated ‘as appropriate’ and often follow a standard cost approach. 
Izračuni zneskov pomoči se lahko „po potrebi“ razlikujejo in pogosto upoštevajo standardni stroškovni pristop.
The Commission agrees that a further improvement regarding better targeting of agri-environment is necessary and is envisaged in the framework of the CAP post-2013. 
Komisija se strinja, da je nadaljnje izboljšanje ciljnega usmerjanja kmetijsko-okoljskih odhodkov potrebno in predvideno v okviru skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013.
However, Member States must strike a balance between the costs of implementing this approach and the expected environmental benefits. 
Vendar morajo države članice doseči ravnovesje med stroški izvajanja tega pristopa in pričakovanimi koristmi za okolje.
Moreover, targeting is not the only valid approach to agri-environment. 
Poleg tega ciljno usmerjanje ni edini veljavni pristop za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe.
Some rural development programmes (RDP) have actually considered the desirable degree of targeting on the basis of an analysis of the costs and benefits involved. 
Nekateri programi razvoja podeželja želeno stopnjo ciljnega usmerjanja dejansko obravnavajo na podlagi analize stroškov in koristi.
The application of selection criteria is not necessary to ensure the most efficient and effective way of spending under agri-environment. 
Uporaba meril za izbor ni nujna za zagotavljanje najučinkovitejšega in najuspešnejšega načina porabe sredstev v okviru kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov.
Eligibility conditions and regional targeting can serve the same purpose. 
Pogoji za upravičenost in regionalno ciljno usmerjanje lahko služijo istemu namenu.
Differentiated co-financing rates at sub-measure level are not foreseen under the current regulatory framework. 
V okviru veljavnega ureditvenega okvira niso predvidene različne stopnje sofinanciranja na ravni podukrepov.
Their introduction would lead to a considerable additional administrative burden and significantly increase the requirements related to the implementation of the respective programmes. 
Njihova uvedba bi vodila v znatno dodatno upravno breme in precej povečala zahteve, povezane z izvajanjem zadevnih programov.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Member States determine participation levels (number of beneficiaries and area to be covered) in response to their environmental needs and objectives. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Države članice določijo ravni sodelovanja (število upravičencev in območje, ki bo zajeto) glede na svoje okoljske potrebe in cilje.
The Commission agrees that certain types of agri-environment operations would merit more research. 
Komisija se strinja, da bi bilo treba za določene vrste kmetijsko-okoljskih operacij izvesti več raziskav.
Recommendation 3 — First indent The Commission agrees that there is a need for better targeting in agri-environment to ensure greater environmental benefits and to improve the effectiveness of the measures. 
Priporočilo 3 – prva alinea Komisija se strinja, da pri kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepih obstaja potreba po boljšem ciljnem usmerjanju za zagotavljanje večjih okoljskih koristi in izboljšanje učinkovitosti ukrepov.
Targeting should not only be linked to specific environmental needs but also to the existing environmental potential and opportunities. 
Ciljno usmerjanje bi moralo biti povezano ne samo s posebnimi okoljskimi potrebami, ampak tudi z obstoječimi okoljskimi potenciali in priložnostmi.
Recommendation 3 — Second indent — First sub-indent When proposing their agri-environment sub-measures, Member States justify them by establishing a link between the sub-measures proposed and the identified needs (be it pressures or potentials). 
Priporočilo 3 – druga alinea – prva podalinea Ko države članice predlagajo svoje kmetijsko-okoljske podukrepe, jih utemeljijo z vzpostavitvijo povezave med predlaganimi podukrepi in opredeljenimi potrebami (bodisi pritiski ali potenciali).
The latter can require the introduction of new farming methods or the maintenance of existing practices. 
Slednje lahko zahtevajo uvedbo novih načinov kmetovanja ali ohranjanje obstoječih praks.
Recommendation 3 — Second indent — Second sub-indent The Commission agrees with the Court’s recommendation. 
Priporočilo 3 – druga alinea – druga podalinea Komisija se strinja s priporočilom Sodišča.
Recommendation 3 — Second indent — Third sub-indent Member States determine participation levels (number of beneficiaries and area to be covered) in response to their environmental needs and objectives. 
Priporočilo 3 – druga alinea – tretja podalinea Države članice določijo ravni sodelovanja (število upravičencev in območje, ki bo zajeto) glede na svoje okoljske potrebe in cilje.
75 Recommendation 3 — Second indent 3 — Fourth sub-indent The Commission agrees with the Court’s recommendation. 
75 Priporočilo 3 – druga alinea – četrta podalinea Komisija se strinja s priporočilom Sodišča.
Recommendation 3 — Third indent Linking the co-financing rate to the environmental potential of a sub-measure would introduce an element of subjective judgment concerning the assessment of each sub-measure’s environmental potential. 
Priporočilo 3 – tretja alinea Povezovanje stopnje sofinanciranja z okoljskim potencialom podukrepa bi uvedlo element subjektivne presoje glede ocene okoljskega potenciala vsakega podukrepa.
The specific environmental needs can be addressed by both types of schemes: basic and higher level. 
Posebne okoljske potrebe se lahko obravnavajo s pomočjo obeh vrst shem: osnovnih in na višji ravni.
The Commission wants agri-environment in pillar 2 to continue to include both basic and higher-level schemes as such a mix allows to address a large number of needs and issues, and to cover a broad area. 
Komisija želi, da kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi v stebru 2 še naprej vključujejo tako osnovne sheme kot sheme na višji ravni, saj takšna mešanica omogoča obravnavanje številnih potreb in vprašanj ter zajetje širokega območja.
Basic schemes, if well designed and implemented, can offer significant environmental benefits at a relatively low cost. 
Osnovne sheme, če so dobro zasnovane in izvajane, lahko nudijo precejšnje koristi za okolje z razmeroma nizkimi stroški.
Recommendation 4 The Commission considers that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, agri-environmental operations should be defined at Member State and not EU level. 
Priporočilo 4 Komisija meni, da bi morale biti kmetijsko-okoljske operacije v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti opredeljene na ravni držav članic in ne na ravni EU.
All three types of sub-measures mentioned by the Court are needed to attain the environmental objectives. 
Za dosego okoljskih ciljev so potrebne vse tri vrste podukrepov, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče.
All of them are also based on the principle that aid amounts are calculated on the basis of income foregone and cost incurred. 
Vse tri tudi temeljijo na načelu, da se zneski pomoči izračunajo na podlagi izpada prihodka in nastalih stroškov.
This helps to prevent attributing values to specific actions in an arbitrary manner. 
To pomaga pri preprečevanju samovoljnega dodajanja vrednosti določenim ukrepom.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Simple sub-measures allow broader participation of farmers and territorial coverage, while more demanding sub-measures have a higher potential in cases where specific problems are to be addressed and specific environmental impacts are expected. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE Enostavni podukrepi omogočajo širše sodelovanje kmetov in večjo ozemeljsko pokritost, medtem ko imajo zahtevnejši podukrepi večje možnosti v primerih, kjer je treba obravnavati posebne težave in so pričakovani posebni vplivi na okolje.
It is not always easy to divide these two types of operations into two separate groups as the effectiveness of the simple operations can be of a significant environmental value. 
Teh dveh vrst operacij ni vedno enostavno razdeliti v dve ločeni skupini, saj ima lahko učinkovitost preprostih operacij precejšno vrednost za okolje.
With regard to organic farming, the Commission will take account of the Court’s recommendation. 
Glede ekološkega kmetovanja bo Komisija upoštevala priporočilo Sodišča.
Organic farming is a measure that requires very demanding management and is implemented across the whole territory of the EU without any specific targeting. 
Ekološko kmetovanje je ukrep, ki zahteva zelo zahtevno upravljanje in se na celotnem ozemlju EU izvaja brez posebnega ciljnega usmerjanja.
Thus, it would constitute a separate measure if the division proposed by the Court were to be employed. 
Zato bi pomenilo ločen ukrep, če bi bila uporabljena razdelitev, ki jo je predlagalo Sodišče.
The Commission agrees that there is scope for improving the effectiveness of agri-environment policy. 
Komisija se strinja, da obstajajo možnosti za izboljšanje kmetijsko-okoljske politike.
The current legal framework already provides a good basis which will need to be reinforced at the programming level. 
Veljavni pravni okvir že zagotavlja dobro podlago, ki jo bo treba okrepiti na ravni načrtovanja.
The effectiveness of agri-environment and the result of the policy can only be comprehensively assessed once the current programming period is over. 
Učinkovitost kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov in rezultate zadevne politike je mogoče v celoti oceniti šele po zaključku programskega obdobja.
Environmental impacts are the result of a combination of many factors and it is not always feasible to identify the precise contribution of specific individual actions. 
Vplivi na okolje so rezultat kombinacije številnih dejavnikov in ni vedno mogoče opredeliti natančnega prispevka določenega posameznega ukrepa.
The strategic approach where measures are combined in a logical framework in order to support a desired outcome reflects this reality. 
Strateški pristop, pri katerem so ukrepi združeni v logičnem okviru, da bi podprli želeni učinek, odraža to dejansko stanje.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2011 — 75 pp. — 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-201-9 doi:10.2865/41418 77 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2011 – 76 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-216-3 doi:10.2865/49154 77
Free publications: How to obtain EU publications • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • at the European Union's representations or delegations. 
KAKO DO PUBLIKACIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE Brezplačne publikacije: • na spletni strani EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • na predstavništvih ali delegacijah Evropske unije.
AGRI-ENVIRONMENT IS A KEY EU POLICY WHICH AIMS TO RESPOND TO SOCIETY’S INCREASING DEMAND FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. THIS REPORT ASSESSES WHETHER THIS POLICY IS WELL DESIGNED AND MANAGED. 
KMETIJSKO-OKOLJSKI UKREPI SO ENA OD KLJUČNIH POLITIK EU, KATERE NAMEN JE ZAGOTAVLJANJE ODZIVA NA NARAŠČAJOČE ZAHTEVE DRUŽBE PO OKOLJSKIH STORITVAH. TO POROČILO OCENJUJE, ALI JE TA POLITIKA DOBRO PRIPRAVLJENA IN UPRAVLJANA.
THE COURT FOUND THAT THE CONDITIONS FOR ASSESSING WHETHER OR NOT THE OBJECTIVES OF THE POLICY HAVE BEEN ACHIEVED ARE NOT IN PLACE. 
SODIŠČE JE UGOTOVILO, DA POGOJI ZA OCENJEVANJE, ALI SO BILI CILJI POLITIKE DOSEŽENI, NISO VZPOSTAVLJENI.
THE SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING GUIDANCE TO FARMERS WERE GENERALLY WELL IMPLEMENTED. 
SISTEMI USMERJANJA KMETOV SO BILI NA SPLOŠNO DOBRI.
HOWEVER, CONSIDERABLE PROBLEMS WERE IDENTIFIED CONCERNING THE AID AMOUNTS. MOST EXPENDITURE WAS MADE ON BASIC HORIZONTAL SCHEMES WITHOUT APPLYING SELECTION PROCEDURES AND WITHOUT CLEAR DECISIONS ABOUT THE DESIRABLE DEGREE OF TARGETING. 
VENDAR SO BILI ODKRITI PRECEJŠNJI PROBLEMI V ZVEZI Z ZNESKI POMOČI. VEČINA ODHODKOV JE BILA PORABLJENA ZA OSNOVNE HORIZONTALNE SHEME BREZ UPORABE IZBIRNIH POSTOPKOV IN BREZ JASNIH ODLOČITEV O ŽELENI STOPNJI CILJNEGA USMERJANJA.
ALTHOUGH THE AUDIT IDENTIFIED GOOD PRACTICES, THE WEAKNESSES FOUND BY THE COURT HAVE HAMPERED OPTIMAL ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MAIN OBJECTIVES OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENT, NAMELY CONTRIBUTING TO EU-LEVEL PRIORITY AREAS (BIODIVERSITY, WATER, CLIMATE CHANGE) AND IMPROVING THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE COUNTRYSIDE. 
ČEPRAV SO BILE Z REVIZIJO NAJDENE DOBRE PRAKSE, PA SLABOSTI, KI JIH JE UGOTOVILO SODIŠČE, OVIRAJO OPTIMALNO DOSEGANJE GLAVNIH CILJEV KMETIJSKO-OKOLJSKIH UKREPOV, IN SICER PRISPEVANJE K PREDNOSTNIM PODROČJEM NA RAVNI EU (BIOTSKA RAZNOVRSTNOST, VODE, PODNEBNE SPREMEMBE) TER IZBOLJŠANJE OKOLJA IN PODEŽELJA.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-11-005-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJ-AB-11-005-SL-C
Special Report No 11 2011 ISSN 1831-0834 
Posebno poročilo št.
Special Report No 11 2011 DO THE DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS SCHEME ALLOW IT TO BE EFFECTIVE? (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 11 2011 ALI ZASNOVA IN UPRAVLJANJE SHEME GEOGRAFSKIH OZNAČB OMOGOČATA NJENO USPEŠNOST? (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Fax +352 4398-46410 E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Special Report No 11 2011 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011 ISBN 978-92-9237-267-5 doi:10.2865/75364 © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2011 ISBN 978-92-9237-282-8 doi:10.2865/81264 © Evropska unija, 2011 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
39–55 39–40 41–55 CONSUMER RECOGNITION OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS SCHEME IS LOW AND THE OPTIONS USED ARE UNLIKELY TO INCREASE IT CONSUMER RECOGNITION OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS SCHEME IS LOW THE OPTIONS USED ARE UNLIKELY TO RAISE AWARENESS OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS SCHEME CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 56–62 4 Special Report No 11/2011 – Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective? 
11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost? POTROŠNIKI SLABO POZNAJO SHEMO GEOGRAFSKIH OZNAČB IN NI VERJETNO, DA BI SE TO IZBOLJŠALO S SREDSTVI, KI SE UPORABLJAJO POTROŠNIKI SLABO POZNAJO SHEMO GEOGRAFSKIH OZNAČB NI VERJETNO, DA BI SE POZNAVANJE SHEME GEOGRAFSKIH OZNAČB IZBOLJŠALO S SREDSTVI, KI SE UPORABLJAJO ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 39–55 39–40 41–55 56–62 4 Posebno poročilo št.
5 GLOSSARY Applicant group: An association, irrespective of its legal form or composition, of producers and processors dealing with the same agricultural product or foodstuff. It submits the application for registration of a product name as a PDO or PGI to the national authority responsible for scrutiny. 
11/2011 – Ali zasnova in upravljanje sheme geografskih označb omogočata njeno uspešnost? 5 GLOSAR Enotni dokument: dokument, ki je del vloge za registracijo imena kot ZOP ali ZGO in ga preveri Komisija.
The checks are provided for by Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs. 
Preverjanje je določeno v členu 11 Uredbe (ES) št.
Competent authority: Central authority of a Member State responsible/competent for the organisation of official controls for checking compliance of a PDO or PGI product with the product specification and surveillance of the use of the name in the market place. 
Pristojni organ: osrednji organ države članice, odgovoren/pristojen za organizacijo uradnega nadzora za preverjanje skladnosti proizvoda z ZOP ali ZGO s specifikacijami proizvoda in nadzora uporabe imena na trgu.
Geographical indications (GI) scheme: A scheme that intends to protect names that identify products whose given quality, reputation or other characteristic are essentially attributable to their geographical origin. 
Shema geografskih označb (GO): shema, namenjena zaščiti imen, ki označujejo proizvode, katerih kakovost, sloves ali druge značilnosti je mogoče pripisati predvsem njihovemu geografskemu poreklu.
Depending on the degree and type of association with a specific region, it distinguishes between two types of protected names — PDO and PGI. 
Glede na stopnjo in vrsto povezave z neko regijo razlikuje med dvema vrstama zaščitenih imen: ZOP in ZGO.
Product specification: A document that forms part of the application for registration of a name as a PDO or PGI. 
Specifikacija proizvoda: dokument, ki je del vloge za registracijo imena kot ZOP ali ZGO.
It sets out important attributes of the product such as the name protected, the description of the product, the definition of the geographical area, the method of obtaining the product and details bearing out the link between the product and the geographical area. 
Določa pomembne atribute proizvoda, kot so zaščiteno ime, opis proizvoda, opredelitev geografskega območja, metoda pridobivanja proizvoda in podrobnosti, ki izkazujejo povezavo med proizvodom in geografskim območjem.
A product marketed under a protected name needs to comply with the product specification. 
Proizvod, ki se trži pod zaščitenim imenom, mora ustrezati specifikaciji.
Protected geographical indication (PGI): Names registered as a protected geographical indication describe products having specific characteristics or a reputation associating them with a given geographical area where at least one stage of the production takes place. 
Zaščitena geografska označba (ZGO): imena, registrirana kot zaščitene geografske označbe, se uporabljajo za oznako proizvodov, ki imajo posebne lastnosti ali sloves, ki jih je mogoče pripisati nekemu geografskemu območju, na katerem poteka vsaj ena faza proizvodnje.
If the products are processed, the raw materials may come from another geographical area. 
Če gre za predelane proizvode, lahko surovine prihajajo z drugega geografskega območja.