natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
20 The RAD application was designed for the needs and purposes of the discharge procedure. 
20 Aplikacija RAD je bila zasnovana za potrebe in namene postopka razrešnice.
It provides reliable, relevant and pertinent information that demonstrates the status of the actions undertaken by the Commission in relation to the follow-up of the discharge. 
Zagotavlja zanesljive, relevantne in koristne informacije, ki prikazujejo stanje izvedbe ukrepov, ki jih je Komisija sprejela glede nadaljnjega ukrepanja v zvezi z razrešnico.
When deciding on future developments of RAD, the Commission will continue taking into account recommendations made by the Court. 
Komisija bo pri odločanju o nadaljnjem razvoju aplikacije RAD še naprej upoštevala priporočila Sodišča.
20(a) The procedures within the RAD application, including the links to special reports issued by the Court and Commission’s services in charge for the implementation of the recommendations are in place, documented and available. 
20(a) Postopki v okviru aplikacije RAD, vključno s povezavami na posebna poročila Sodišča in službe Komisije, odgovorne za izvajanje priporočil, so vzpostavljeni, dokumentirani in na voljo.
All data is encoded on the responsibility of the relevant DGs and services following clear rules for relevant inter-service consultations, validation and approval workflows at appropriate hierarchical level. 
Za vnos vseh podatkov so odgovorni zadevni generalni direktorati in službe v skladu z jasnimi pravili za zadevna posvetovanja med službami, potrjevanje in postopke dela v zvezi z odobritvijo na ustrezni hierarhični ravni.
20(b) In compliance with its internal control framework and related control arrangements, and for the specific cases in shared management where it has a supervisory role to play, the Commission will adequately review significant issues with the Member States. 
20(b) Komisija bo v skladu s svojim okvirom notranje kontrole in povezanimi kontrolnimi ureditvami ter v posebnih primerih deljenega upravljanja, v katerih ima nadzorno vlogo, bistvena vprašanja ustrezno pregledala z državami članicami.
The joint Commission Court Working Group has as an objective to explore ways to better monitor, implement and report on the follow-up of the Court’s recommendations. 
Cilj skupne delovne skupine Komisije in Sodišča je proučiti načine za boljše spremljanje, izvajanje in poročanje o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi priporočil Sodišča. priporočil
Reply of the Commission 44 20(c) The Commission and the Court may conclude differently on the effective implementation of the accepted SRs’ recommendations. 
Odgovori Komisije 44 20(c) Komisija in Sodišče lahko prideta do različnih zaključkov glede uspešnega izvajanja sprejetih priporočil iz posebnih poročil.
The RAD application provides the possibility to indicate the state-of-play of the action taken by the Commission services, including vis-à-vis the expected completion date. 
Aplikacija RAD zagotavlja možnost navedbe trenutnega stanja izvedbe ukrepa, ki so ga sprejele službe Komisije, vključno v zvezi s pričakovanim datumom zaključka.
20(d) The Commission reports on the follow-up of the Court’s recommendations addressed to the Commission in the annual activity reports of the DGs and services and in the annual report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the follow-up to the discharge of the relevant financial year. 
20(d) Komisija o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi priporočil Sodišča, naslovljenih na Komisijo, poroča v letnih poročilih generalnih direktoratov in služb o dejavnostih ter v letnem poročilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o nadaljnjem ukrepanju v zvezi z razrešnico za zadevno proračunsko leto.
The Commission, however, acknowledges that further improvements in the reporting may be achieved. 
Vendar priznava, da so pri poročanju mogoče nadaljnje izboljšave.
21 By note dated 16 October 2014 concerning the release of version 6.4 of the RAD application, the DGs and services were provided with clear instructions on the new functionality of ‘partially implemented recommendations’. 
21 Generalni direktorati in službe so z dopisom z dne 16. oktobra 2014 v zvezi z izdajo različice 6.4 aplikacije RAD prejeli jasna navodila o novi funkciji „deloma izvedena priporočila“.
Raising awareness and training concerning the new recommendation status ‘partially implemented’ was ensured at the level of all DGs and services. 
Na ravni vseh generalnih direktoratov in služb sta se izvedla ozaveščanje in usposabljanje v zvezi z novim stanjem izvedbe priporočil, „deloma izvedeno“.
The Commission is of the opinion that this new functionality is used by the DGs and services, if and where applicable. 
Komisija meni, da generalni direktorati in službe to novo funkcijo uporabljajo po potrebi in kjer je primerno.
22 The Commission is committed to ensuring that accepted Court’s SRs recommendations are systematically implemented and followed up. 
22 Komisija si prizadeva, da se sprejeta priporočila iz posebnih poročil Sodišča sistematično izvajajo in nadalje spremljajo.
The Commission and the Court may conclude differently on the effective implementation of the recommendations. 
Komisija in Sodišče lahko prideta glede učinkovitega izvajanja priporočil do različnih zaključkov.
The Commission acknowledges that further improvement in the follow-up process may be achieved for recommendations for which the two institutions share the conclusions on the implementation status. 
Komisija priznava, da so pri priporočilih, v zvezi s katerimi prideta obe instituciji do enakega zaključka o stanju izvedbe, mogoče nadaljnje izboljšave postopka nadaljnjega spremljanja.
23 As stated in the Commission’s reply to paragraph 26 of the follow-up report in 2013 (SR 19/2013), harmonising the categories for assessing the actions that address the Court’s recommendations and that are used by the Commission and the Court may be one of subjects for future discussions between the two institutions. 
23 Kot je navedeno v odgovoru Komisije na odstavek 26 poročila za leto 2013 o spremljanju popravnih učinkov (Posebno poročilo št.
Reply of the Commission 45 Best practices regarding other systems and procedures 25 The RAD application was developed to manage the inter-service coordination in the discharge procedure, the relevant Commission’s replies over the years and the related organisation of the inter-service cooperation within the Commission. 
Odgovori Komisije 45 Najboljše prakse pri drugih sistemih in postopkih 25 Aplikacija RAD je bila razvita za upravljanje usklajevanja med službami v postopku razrešnice, zadevnih odgovorov Komisije v preteklih letih in s tem povezane organizacije sodelovanja med službami v okviru Komisije.
Even though further improvements and IT developments may be achieved, the Commission is of the opinion that the RAD application is an adequate tool for supporting the accountability and governance requirements in relation to the discharge procedure. 
Čeprav so mogoče nadaljnje izboljšave in razvoj IT, Komisija meni, da je aplikacija RAD ustrezno orodje za podpiranje zahtev za odgovornost in upravljanje v zvezi s postopkom razrešnice.
Conclusion and recommendation 26 The Commission is committed to ensuring that recommendations made by the Court in its special reports and accepted by the Commission are systematically implemented and followed up. 
Zaključek in priporočila 26 Komisija si prizadeva, da se priporočila, ki jih je Sodišče objavilo v svojih posebnih poročilih in jih je Komisija sprejela, sistematično izvajajo in nadalje spremljajo.
The Commission’s discharge follow-up system and procedures cover all SRs issued by the Court which are relevant for the Commission. 
Sistem in postopki Komisije za nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi z razrešnico zajemajo vsa objavljena posebna poročila Sodišča, ki so pomembna za Komisijo.
27 See Commission replies to paragraphs 20(a), 20(b) and 20(c). 
27 Glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke 20(a), 20(b) in 20(c).
28 The Commission considers that the RAD application provides a global view of all recommendations and requests addressed to the Commission in relation to the discharge procedure. 
28 Komisija meni, da aplikacija RAD omogoča celostni pregled vseh priporočil in zahtev, naslovljenih na Komisijo v zvezi s postopkom razrešnice.
As stated in the Commission’s reply to paragraph 26 of the Follow-up Special Report 19/2013, harmonising the categories for assessing the actions that address the Court’s recommendations and that are used by the Commission and the Court may be one of the subjects for future discussions between the two institutions. 
Kot je navedeno v odgovoru Komisije na odstavek 26 Posebnega poročila št. 19/2013 o spremljanju popravnih učinkov, je lahko uskladitev kategorij za ocenjevanje ukrepov, ki obravnavajo priporočila Sodišča, in jih uporabljata Komisija in Sodišče, ena od tem prihodnjih razprav med institucijama.
As regards the follow-up of the Court’s recommendations, the Commission has taken the decision that this is a management responsibility and if allocated to the IAS it would risk compromising IAS’ independence. 
Kar zadeva nadaljnje ukrepanje na podlagi priporočil Sodišča, je Komisija sprejela odločitev, da je to naloga poslovodstva, ki bi lahko ogrozila neodvisnost službe za notranjo revizijo, če bi ji bila dodeljena.
Reply of the Commission 46 29 The Commission considers that its control arrangements are in line with international control and best practices. 
Odgovori Komisije 46 29 Komisija meni, da so njene kontrolne ureditve v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi kontrole ter dobrimi praksami.
However, the Commission is committed to address further challenges concerning the discharge follow-up system and procedures. 
Vendar si Komisija prizadeva, da bi obravnavala nadaljnje izzive v zvezi s sistemom in postopki za nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi z razrešnico.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 28. 
Glej tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 28.
29(a) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
29(a) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission will assess the possibility to improve the information on the implementation status of the actions taken. 
Ocenila bo možnosti za izboljšanje informacij o stanju izvedbe sprejetih ukrepov.
29(b) The Commission accepts this recommendation for the specific cases in shared management where it has a supervisory role to play. 
29(b) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo za posebne primere v okviru skupnega upravljanja, pri katerih ima nadzorno vlogo.
The Commission will adequately review significant issues with the Member States. 
Komisija bo bistvena vprašanja ustrezno pregledovala z državami članicami.
The joint Commission Court Working Group has as an objective to explore ways to better monitor, implement and report on the follow-up of the Court’s recommendations. 
Cilj skupne delovne skupine Komisije in Sodišča je proučiti načine za boljše spremljanje, izvajanje in poročanje o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi priporočil Sodišča.
29(c) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
29(c) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission is committed to further improve the reporting of the actions in the annual activity reports. 
Prizadevala si bo za nadaljnje izboljšanje poročanja o ukrepih v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih.
29(d) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
29(d) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
The Commission will undergo a follow-up with all DGs and services concerned. 
Nadalje bo spremljala vse zadevne generalne direktorate in službe.
Reply of the Commission 47 Annexes Agriculture: management instruments applied to the market in milk and milk products Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (2) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Odgovori Komisije 47 Priloge Kmetijstvo: instrumenti za upravljanje trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (2) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
The creation of (new) producer organisations requires time and a strong dynamic coming from farmers themselves e.g. to create producers organisations and in a next step to start collective negotiations. 
Za ustanavljanje (novih) organizacij proizvajalcev sta potrebna čas in močna zavezanost kmetov, npr. da ustvarijo organizacije proizvajalcev, nato pa začnejo skupna pogajanja.
Favourable market developments and prospects in 2012 and 2013 might not have stimulated farmers to join in producer organisations. 
Ugoden razvoj na trgu in ugodne napovedi v letih 2012 in 2013 morda niso spodbudili kmetov, da bi se pridružili organizacijam proizvajalcev.
In addition to numerous discussions with Member States at Commission and Council level regarding the implementation of the ‘Milk Package’ at Member State level (by authorities and stakeholders), the Commission actively promoted the measures among stakeholders, notably farmers and farmers organisations, on numerous formal and informal occasions (e.g. presentations made by Commission representatives at meetings and events). 
Komisija je poleg številnih razprav z državami članicami na ravni Komisije in Sveta o tem, kako so (organi in delež-niki) na ravni držav članic izvajali „sveženj ukrepov za mleko“ ob številnih formalnih in neformalnih priložnostih dejavno spodbujala ukrepe med deležniki, zlasti kmeti in organizacijami kmetov (npr. predstavitve, ki so jih predstavniki Komisije pripravili za srečanja in dogodke).
The ‘Milk Package’ was discussed with stakeholders on a regular basis in the Advisory Groups for Milk, where farmers’ organisations (Copa-Cogeca, European Coordination Via Campesina, European Milk Board) hold an important number of chairs. 
O svežnju ukrepov za mleko se je redno razpravljalo z deležniki v svetovalnih skupinah za mleko, v katerih imajo organizacije kmetov (Copa-Cogeca, Evropska koordinacija Via Campesina in European Milk Board (evropska organizacija za mleko)) pomembno število sedežev.
Also in the joint meetings of the Management Committee and the Advisory Group on Milk held in 2011 and 2012 the Milk Package was discussed. 
O svežnju ukrepov za mleko se je razpravljalo tudi na skupnih sestankih upravljalnega odbora in svetovalne skupine za mleko v letih 2011 in 2012.
The Commission also participated in two seminars (in 2012 and 2014 organised by Copa-Cogeca on the implementation of the Milk Package encouraging farmers (organisations) to take advantage of the milk package (producer organisations, etc.). 
Komisija je sodelovala tudi na dveh seminarjih v letih 2012 in 2014, ki ju je organizacija Copa-Cogeca organizirala v zvezi z izvajanjem svežnja ukrepov za mleko in na katerih je kmete (organizacije) spodbujala, naj izkoristijo sveženj ukrepov za mleko (organizacije proizvajalcev itd.).
In addition, at the conference ‘THE EU DAIRY SECTOR: DEVELOPING BEYOND 2015’ held in 2013 and representing all stakeholders, the Milk Package was among the discussed subjects. 
Poleg tega se je o svežnju ukrepov za mleko razpravljalo na konferenci z naslovom „SEKTOR MLEKA V EU: RAZVOJ PO LETU 2015“, ki je bila organizirana leta 2013 in na kateri so bili zastopani vsi deležniki.
Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (3) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (3) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
In line with the subsidiarity principle the legislators considered that identifying types of farming or agricultural sectors to be supported by direct payments due to certain difficulties they encounter is of the exclusive responsibility of the Member States. 
Zakonodajalci so v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti menili, da so za opredelitev vrst kmetovanja ali kmetijskih sektorjev, ki jih je treba podpreti z neposrednimi plačili zaradi določenih težav, s katerimi se spopadajo, izključno odgovorne države članice.
They were thought to be in the best place to identify regions or sectors with difficulties on their territory and to fix priorities among various needs for targeted support, taking also into account the sector specialisation of the regions. 
Zdi se, da so slednje najprimernejše za opredelitev regij ali sektorjev, ki imajo na svojem ozemlju težave, in za določitev prednostne razvrstitve posameznih potreb po ciljno usmerjeni podpori, pri čemer se hkrati upošteva sektorska specializacija regij.
The legislators provided that Member States shall include in each rural development programme a SWOT analysis of the situation and an identification of the needs that have to be addressed in the geographical area covered by the programme. 
Zakonodajalci so določili, da države članice v vsak program razvoja podeželja vključijo analizo SWOT stanja in opredelitev potreb, ki jih je treba obravnavati na geografskem območju, zajetem v programu.
A description of the strategy demonstrating that specific needs linked with specific conditions at regional or sub-regional level are taken into account and concretely addressed through adequately designed combinations of measures or thematic sub-programme has to be included. 
Vključiti je treba opis strategije, ki dokazuje, da se posebne potrebe, povezane s posebnimi pogoji na regionalni ali podregionalni ravni upoštevajo in konkretno obravnavajo z ustrezno oblikovanimi kombinacijami ukrepov ali tematskih podprogramov.
It is for Member States to indicate weaknesses and threats if need be for the milk sector and to supply measures to farmers to help them meeting needs. 
Države članice so tiste, ki morajo po potrebi opredeliti slabosti in nevarnosti za sektor mleka ter kmetom zagotoviti ukrepe, s katerimi bodo lahko izpolnili potrebe.
As regards cross compliance and the new greening of direct payments, there is a need to leave to Member States a certain margin of manoeuvre to allow them taking into account local needs and constraints as well as specific environmental issues. 
Kar zadeva navzkrižno skladnost in novo zeleno komponento neposrednih plačil, je treba državam članicam pustiti določen manevrski prostor, ki jim bo omogočil, da upoštevajo lokalne potrebe in omejitve ter posebna okoljska vprašanja.
This principle therefore was and continues being followed in the EU legislation. 
To načelo se torej je in se bo še naprej upoštevalo v zakonodaji EU.
Reply of the Commission 48 Annex III Agriculture: reform of the sugar market Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (3) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Odgovori Komisije 48 Priloga III Kmetijstvo: reforma trga sladkorja Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (3) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
One of the objectives of the 2006 sugar reform was to comply with Union’s obligations flowing from international agreements and to reflect international arrangements, such as the Duty Free Quota Free access for the Least Developed Countries adopted in the pursuit of the Union’s international trade and development policy. 
Eden od ciljev reforme sektorja sladkorja iz leta 2006 je bil izpolniti obveznosti Unije, ki izhajajo iz mednarodnih sporazumov, in ravnati v skladu z mednarodnimi ureditvami, kot je dostop brez dajatev in kvot za najmanj razvite države, ki je bil sprejet zaradi uresničevanja mednarodne trgovinske in razvojne politike Unije.
Therefore, the Court’s assessment that the EU is now a net importer and relies on sugar import cannot be considered as contrary to the Treaty objective of assuring availability of supply. 
Zato ocene Sodišča, da je EU zdaj neto uvoznica in je odvisna od uvoza sladkorja, ni mogoče šteti kot v nasprotju s ciljem Pogodbe glede zagotavljanja redne preskrbe.
Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (4) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (4) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
The Commission has launched an antitrust enquiry and the Member States have made the necessary enquiries on competition in the sugar sector. 
Komisija je začela preiskavo protimonopolne politike in države članice so opravile potrebne poizvedbe glede konkurence v sektorju sladkorja.
Moreover, based on the simple fact that the 2015 EU sugar prices are at the lowest level since the reform, it can be reasonably assumed that the Treaty objective of sugar supply at reasonable prices for the consumers is met. 
Poleg tega je mogoče na podlagi preprostega dejstva, da so bile cene sladkorja v EU v letu 2015 na najnižji ravni od uvedbe reforme razumno sklepati, da je cilj Pogodbe glede preskrbe s sladkorjem po razumnih cenah za potrošnike izpolnjen.
Common reply to recommendations (5) and (6) In line with the subsidiarity principle, the responsibility for the implementation of these recommendations is with the Member States. 
Skupni odgovor na priporočili (5) in (6) V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti so za izvajanje teh priporočil odgovorne države članice.
Agriculture: specific measures in favour of the outermost regions and Aegean Islands Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (1) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Kmetijstvo: posebni ukrepi v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in na egejskih otokih Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (1) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
The common indicators (as defined in Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 180/2014) had to be gathered since the presentation of the 2013 annual reports to be presented in 2014. 
Po predložitvi letnih poročil za leto 2013 je bilo treba zbrati enotne kazalnike (kot so opredeljeni v Prilogi VIII k Uredbi (EU) št. 180/2014), ki bodo predstavljeni leta 2014.
2013 was a transition year. 
Leto 2013 je bilo prehodno.
If some indicators were missing in these 2013 reports (70 % of indicators), all the indicators are given in the 2014 reports (received in 2015), although some improvements should still be brought in future reports. 
Četudi so v teh poročilih za leto 2013 nekateri kazalniki manjkali (70 % kazalnikov), so v poročilih za leto 2014 (prejetih leta 2015) navedeni vsi kazalniki, kljub temu pa bi bilo treba v prihodnjih poročilih uvesti nekaj izboljšav.
Bilateral meetings are held on a regular basis, in particular in the context of programme modifications. 
Dvostranska srečanja potekajo redno, zlasti v okviru sprememb programa.
It is then when the Commission services recall some best practices to be followed by Member States, such as the information to be given to beneficiaries as well as the importance given to verifiability and controllability of new measures. 
Službe Komisije na teh srečanjih opozorijo na nekatere dobre prakse, ki jih morajo upoštevati države članice, kot so informacije, ki jih je treba dati upravičencem ter pomen, pripisan preverljivosti in možnosti nadzorovanja novih ukrepov.
Furthermore, standard reporting forms for POSEI/SAI control statistics to be used as of 2014 reporting have been presented to Management Committee of Direct Payments CDP on 9 July 2014 and subsequent exchange of information with Member States have been held to adopt guidelines on the collection of these data. 
Poleg tega so bili 9. julija 2014 Upravljalnemu odboru za neposredna plačila predloženi standardni obrazci za poročanje o kontrolnih statističnih podatkih za programe POSEI/SAI, ki bi jih bilo treba uporabljati od leta 2014, nato pa so se z državami članicami izmenjale informacije zaradi sprejetja smernic o zbiranju teh podatkov.
These data are now included in the annual report. 
Ti podatki so sedaj vključeni v letno poročilo.
Reply of the Commission 49 Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (4) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Odgovori Komisije 49 Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (4) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
The Commission stresses that the audit priorities are established according to the central risk analyses in line with the available audit resources. 
Komisija poudarja, da se prednostne naloge revizije določijo glede na osrednjo analizo tveganja v skladu z razpoložljivimi revizijskimi viri.