natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Co-financing is included in the current dialogue with the Russian authorities and its importance is witnessed through its mentioning in the Country Strategy Paper for Russia for 2007 to 2013. (d) The Commission systematically carries out sector and country-wide evaluations (see paragraph 53). 
V trenutni dialog z ruskimi organi je vključeno sofinanciranje in njegova navedba v Strateškem dokumentu države za Rusijo za obdobje 2007–2013 potrjuje njegovo pomembnost. (d) Komisija sistematično izvaja sektorske ocene in ocene, ki zajemajo vso državo (glej odstavek 53).
Furthermore, lessons learnt are systematically taken into account in the establishment of each project fiche for Tacis projects. 
Nadalje, pridobljene izkušnje se sistematično upoštevajo pri oblikovanju vsake razpisne dokumentacije za projekte TACIS.
Finally, the establishment of the Directorate ÔQuality SupportŐ also foster the build-up of institutional knowledge on results of previous projects. 
Nazadnje, vzpostavitev direktorata „za podporo kakovosti“ prav tako pospešuje poglabljanje institucionalnega znanja o rezultatih prejšnjih projektov.
56. (a) The Commission would like to shorten the programming process but without compromising external dialogue and prejudicing a sense of ownership. 
56. (a) Komisija si želi skrajšati postopek programiranja, toda ne da bi ogrožala zunanji dialog in škodovala občutku za lastništvo.
Dialogue is important, and engaging the large Russian bureaucracy in sustained dialogue is not straightforward, despite a generally improved political environment following agreement on the joint Common Spaces policy. 
Dialog je pomemben, toda kljub na splošno boljšem političnem okolju po sporazumu o skupni politiki skupnih prostorov, vključevanje obsežne ruske birokracije v trajni dialog ni enostavno.
A programming mission did take place in October 2005 and the Delegation is in constant dialogue with its Russian counterparts. 
Programska misija se je odvijala oktobra 2005 in delegacija je v stalnem dialogu z ruskimi organi.
The regulatory obligation to consult Member States takes time. 
Za regulativno obveznost posvetovanja z državami članicami je potrebnega nekaj časa.
The Commission will endeavour to finalise the National Indicative Programme 2007 to 2010 sufficiently early to allow timely project preparation for the 2007 action programme. (b) The Commission shares the assessment that projects should only be financed when their objectives are ÔsmartŐ (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, timed) and ownership of the beneficiary exists. 
Komisija si bo prizadevala dovolj zgodaj zaključiti Nacionalni indikativni program 2007–2010, da bo omogočila pravočasno pripravo projektov za akcijski program 2007. (b) Komisija soglaša z oceno, v skladu s katero bi bilo treba projekte financirati le, kadar so njihovi cilji smart (specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, realistični in časovno določeni) in kadar obstaja lastništvo upravičenca.
Co-financing is already an important element with the Russian authorities. (c) Amongst others the External Assistance reform has also strengthened the quality of the projects, i.e. by introducing systematic review of projects/programmes at identification and formulation stages by Quality Support Groups, as well as by systematic use of result-oriented monitoring. 
Sofinanciranje že pomeni pomemben element pri ruskih organih. (c) Med drugim je reforma zunanje pomoči tudi okrepila kakovost projektov, tj. z uvedbo sistematičnega pregleda projektov/programov, ki bi ga na stopnjah opredeljevanja in načrtovanja izvajale skupine za podporo kakovosti, ter s sistematično rabo spremljanja, usmerjenega k rezultatom.
On project level also systematic use of logical frameworks with objectively verifiable indicators is put in place. 
Na ravni projekta je uvedena tudi sistematična raba logičnih okvirov z objektivno preverljivimi kazalniki.
PCM and logical framework have been systematically used by the Commission since 2001. 
Komisija je sistematično uporabljala vodenje projektnega cikla in logični okvir od leta 2001.
Since devolution, due to the CommissionŐs presence on the ground, monitoring and consequently reacting to shortcomings in project implementation can be carried out more easily and efficiently compared to the period under investigation by the Court. (d) As for sustainability please see response above (c). 
Zaradi prisotnosti Komisije na kraju samem se od prenosa spremljanje in posledično odzivanje na pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju projektov lažje in učinkoviteje izvaja v primerjavi z obdobjem, ki ga obravnava preiskava Sodišča. (d) Kar zadeva trajnost, prosimo, da gledate zgornji odgovor (c).
To date, The Commission systematically carries out sector or countrywide evaluations. 
Komisija sistematično izvaja sektorske ocene ali ocene, ki zajemajo vso državo.
It will consider increasing the number of project-based evaluations (paragraph 53). 
Proučila bo povečanje števila ocen, ki temeljijo na projektu (odstavek 53).
The Delegation in Moscow also puts a lot of effort into donor coordination and, consequently, tries to implement best practices wherever appropriate and possible. 
Delegacija v Moskvi si prav tako močno prizadeva za koordinacijo donatorjev in zato poskuša izvajati najboljše prakse, kadar je primerno in mogoče.
Background............................................................ Auditscopeandapproach ................................................ 
Obsegrevizijeinpristop .................................................. STRATEGIJA KOMISIJE ZA OKOLJSKE VIDIKE NJENE RAZVOJNE POMOČI . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMMISSION STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT AID Introduction ........................................................... 
Uvod.................................................................
Adequate management arrangements for implementing the CommissionŐs environment mainstreaming strategy and assessing the environmental performance of its development aidarestilltobemade ................................................... 
Ustrezna ureditev upravljanja za izvajanje Komisijine strategije za integracijo okolja in ocenjevanje okoljske učinkovitosti njene razvojne pomoči še ni vzpostavljena . . . . . . . . . . .
Mechanism for overseeing the implementation of the environmental mainstreaming strategy ........................................................... 
OCENAUSPEŠNOSTIKOMISIJINEINTEGRACIJEOKOLJA...........................
Systems for assessing the environmental performance of the CommissionŐs develop-mentaid .......................................................... 
Za integracijo okolja v programe, upravičene do proračunske podpore, je bilo malo storjeno .................................................................
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COMMISSIONŐS ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING .......................................................... 
Ocenauspešnostiprojektov ...............................................
Introduction ........................................................... Progress was made in 2005 in developing country environmental analysis for new Coun-tryStrategyPapersalthoughitsimpactcannotyetbeassessed .................... Little has been done to mainstream the environment into budgetary support programmes Procedures for environmental mainstreaming at project level have not been sufficiently systematic ............................................................. 
23 PRILOGAIII–Pregleduspešnostiprojektov .................................................. 28 OdgovoriKomisije ....................................................................
Introduction ........................................................... 
Zamudepripripraviinizvajanjuprojektov ...............................
23 ANNEXIIIŃOverviewofprojecteffectiveness ............................................... 
Omejen napredek pri izgradnji institucionalnih zmogljivosti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Limitedprogressininstitutionalcapacitybuilding .......................... The need for greater focus on the sustainable use of natural resources by local communities .......................................................... 
Potreba po večji osredotočenosti lokalnih skupnosti na trajnostno rabo naravnih virov ..............................................................
Unrealisticapproachtofinancialviability................................. 
Nezadostenvplivprojektovnapolitičniinpravniokvir......................
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recommendations ...................................................... Establishing a comprehensive strategy for the environment and following up its implementation..................................................... 
ZAKLJUČKIINPRIPOROČILA ................................................. Zaključki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/3 ACP ALA CEPs CSP DFID DG DEV DG ENV DG Relex DWNP ECOFAC EIA Europeaid FAO GEF iQSG KfW MDGs MEAs MEDA NRPP OECD OECD DAC OQSG PEP PRSP SEA UNDP UNEP WSSD WWF ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMINOLOGY African, Caribbean and Pacific States signatory to the Cotonou Agreement Asia and Latin America developing countries Country Environment Profile Country Strategy Papers British Department for International Development Directorate-General for Development Directorate-General for Environment Directorate-General for External Relations Department of Wildlife and National Parks Ecosystmes Forestiers dŐAfrique Centrale Environmental Impact Assessment Europeaid Cooperation Office Food and Agriculture Organisation Global Environment Facility Interservice Quality Support Group German Kreditanstalt fr Wiederaufbau Millennium Development Goals Multilateral Environment Agreements Measures to accompany the economic and social reforms in the Mediterranean non-member countries Natural Resources Policy Programme Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Office Quality Support Group (OQSG) Poverty and Environment Partnership Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Strategic Environmental Assessment United Nations Development Programme United Nations Environment Programme World Summit on Sustainable Development World Wildlife Fund 
29.9.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 235/3 AKP ALA DFID GD DEV GD ENV GD Relex DWNP ECOFAC EuropeAid MEDA OECD OECD DAC UNDP KRATICE IN TERMINOLOGIJA Afriške, karibske in pacifiške države, ki so podpisale Kotonovski sporazum Azijske in latinskoameriške države v razvoju Britanski oddelek za mednarodni razvoj Generalni direktorat za razvoj Generalni direktorat za okolje Generalni direktorat za zunanje zadeve Oddelek za parke z živalmi in nacionalne parke Gozdni ekosistemi osrednje Afrike Urad za sodelovanje EuropeAid Ukrepi za spremljanje gospodarskih in socialnih reform v sredozemskih državah nečlanicah Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj Odbor za razvojno pomoč Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj Program Združenih narodov za razvoj
C 235/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. Protecting the environment is a vital part of promoting sustainable development. 
C 235/4 SL Uradni list Evropske unije POVZETEK I. Varstvo okolja je bistven del spodbujanja trajnostnega razvoja.
The Treaty requires that environmental protection be integrated into the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, including the CommunityŐs external aid. 
Pogodba zahteva, da se varstvo okolja vključi v opredelitev in izvajanje vseh politik in dejavnosti Skupnosti, tudi v zunanjo pomoč Skupnosti.
More generally, the environment has come to figure as a key item on the international development agenda, and environmental sustainability is one of the Millennium Development Goals (see paragraphs 1 to 3). 
V bolj splošnem smislu je okolje postalo ena od osrednjih točk na dnevnem redu mednarodnega razvoja, okoljska trajnost pa je eden od razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja (glej odstavke 1–3).
The European Court of Auditors therefore undertook an audit in 2005 of the CommissionŐs management of the environmental aspects of its development aid. 
Evropsko računsko sodišče je zato leta 2005 opravilo revizijo Komisijinega upravljanja okoljskih vidikov njene razvojne pomoči.
The audit examined whether the Commission had a comprehensive strategy for addressing the environmental aspects of its development cooperation, whether it had made adequate management arrangements to implement the strategy, how far the environment had been integrated (mainstreamed) into the CommissionŐs development programmes and projects, and what were the results of the CommissionŐs environment projects. 
V okviru revizije je bilo pregledano, ali je Komisija imela izčrpno strategijo za reševanje okoljskih vidikov v okviru svojega razvojnega sodelovanja, ali je za izvajanje strategije sprejela ustrezne ureditve upravljanja, do kolikšne mere je bilo okolje integrirano v razvojne programe in projekte Komisije in kakšni so bili rezultati okoljskih projektov Komisije.
As well as reviewing Commission systems in its headquarters and delegations, it also audited 65 environment projects (total value: 560 million euro) and 43 non-environment programmes and projects (total value: 1 073 million euro) in 16 countries (see paragraphs 4 to 7). 
Poleg pregleda sistemov Komisije na njenem sedežu in v delegacijah je bilo revidiranih tudi 65 okoljskih projektov (skupna vrednost: 560 milijonov EUR) in 43 programov in projektov, ki niso bili povezani z okoljem (skupna vrednost: 1 073 milijonov EUR) v 16 državah (glej odstavke 4–7).
The Commission needs to establish a clear comprehensive strategy for the environmental aspects of its development aid. 
Komisija bi morala vzpostaviti jasno izčrpno strategijo za okoljske vidike svoje razvojne pomoči.
While since 2001 there has been a strategy on the need to integrate the environment into development cooperation, the approach to financing programmes and projects in the environment and natural resources sector has not been clearly addressed. 
Čeprav od leta 2001 obstaja strategija o nujnosti integracije okolja v razvojno sodelovanje, se vprašanje pristopa pri financiranju programov in projektov v sektorju okolja in naravnih virov ni jasno reševalo.
The new development policy signed in December 2005 provides a good basis for establishing a comprehensive strategy (paragraphs 9 to 12). 
Nova razvojna politika, podpisana decembra 2005, zagotavlja dobro podlago za vzpostavitev izčrpne strategije (odstavki 9–12).
The CommissionŐs action plan for implementing its mainstreaming strategy has not been systematically followed up and co-ordinated by the three Directorates-General primarily concerned. 
Trije generalni direktorati, ki jih to najbolj zadeva, niso sistematično spremljali in usklajevali akcijskega načrta Komisije za izvajanje njene strategije integracije.
As a result, planned measures have generally been implemented after some delay or not at all (paragraphs 15 to 17). 
Zato so bili načrtovani ukrepi na splošno izvedeni z nekaj zamude ali sploh ne (odstavki 15–17).
The Commission has not carried out an adequate review of the staffing implications of its mainstreaming strategy. 
Komisija ni izvedla ustreznega pregleda o vplivu njene strategije za integracijo na uslužbence.
The Commission has relied on an Environment Helpdesk manned by external experts to provide support to Commission staff, but there was no Helpdesk in place from mid-2002 to mid-2004. 
Komisija se je zanašala na klicni center za okolje, ki so ga vodili zunanji strokovnjaki, in naj bi zagotovil podporo uslužbencem Komisije, vendar klicni center od sredine leta 2002 do sredine leta 2004 ni bil vzpostavljen.
The environment integration manual, to be introduced in 2003, was still not completed at the end of 2005, although this manual was important both for defining mainstreaming procedures to be followed by Commission staff and as a key training input. 
Priročnik o integraciji okolja, ki naj bi bil uveden leta 2003, do konca leta 2005 še ni bil dokončan, čeprav je bil pomemben tako za postopke integracije, ki naj bi jih upoštevali uslužbenci Komisije, in kot ključni pripomoček za usposabljanje.
Training courses have not been compulsory for key officials, although this was foreseen, and have often been poorly attended (see paragraphs 18 to 23). 
Čeprav je bilo to predvideno, tečaji usposabljanja za ključne uradnike niso bili obvezni in so bili pogosto slabo obiskani (glej odstavke 18–23).
There is a need to further strengthen reporting, monitoring and evaluation systems on the environmental aspects of the CommissionŐs development cooperation to enable its performance in this area to be better assessed (see paragraphs 24 to 28). 
Sisteme poročanja, spremljanja in vrednotenja o okoljskih vidikih razvojnega sodelovanja Komisije je treba še dodatno okrepiti, kar bo omogočilo boljše ocenjevanje njene učinkovitosti na tem področju (glej odstavke 24–28).
The Commission has made only limited progress since 2001 in mainstreaming the environment into its development cooperation. 
Komisija je pri vključevanju okolja v svoje razvojno sodelovanje od leta 2001 dosegla le omejen napredek.
The Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) drawn up by the Commission in conjunction with beneficiary countries covering the CommissionŐs aid to beneficiary countries over the period 2001 to 2006 did not take sufficient account of environmental issues. 
V državnih strateških dokumentih, ki jih je Komisija pripravila skupaj z državami upravičenkami in zajemajo pomoč tem državam v obdobju od leta 2001 do 2006, okoljska vprašanja niso bila dovolj upoštevana.
In preparing the new generation of CSPs (2007 to 2013), the Commission has been taking a much more systematic approach to analysing environmental issues in beneficiary countries through the establishment of Country Environment Profiles (CEPs) although it is too early to assess how far this analysis will influence the CSPs themselves (paragraphs 29 to 35). 
Pri pripravi nove generacije državnih strateških dokumentov (2007–2013) je Komisija pri analiziranju okoljskih vprašanj v državah upravičenkah uporabila veliko bolj sistematičen pristop in sicer z uvedbo državnih okoljskih profilov, čeprav je še prezgodaj, da bi ocenili, v kolikšni meri bo to vplivalo na državne strateške dokumente (odstavki 29–35).
Despite the increasing importance of budgetary support as a form of development aid, the Commission has done little to mainstream the environment into this area (paragraphs 36 to 38). 
Komisija kljub naraščajoči pomembnosti proračunske podpore kot oblike razvojne pomoči ni storila veliko za integracijo okolja v to področje (odstavki 36–38).
There has been no consistent system for the environmental screening of new projects. 
Doslednega sistema za pregled novih projektov z okoljskega vidika ni.
The Commission has no inventory of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) performed on development projects and evidence was found that they had not always been carried out where they should have been carried out. 
Komisija nima evidence o presojah vplivov na okolje, opravljenih pri razvojnih projektih, z dokazi, da te niso izvedene vedno, ko bi morale biti.
There is also a need to establish procedures to ensure the implementation of EIA recommendations (see paragraphs 39 to 46). 
Prav tako je treba vzpostaviti postopke, ki bodo zagotavljali izvajanje priporočil iz presoje vplivov na okolje (glej odstavke 39–46).
V. Almost all environment projects examined were relevant to beneficiary country needs, and frequently also addressed global conservation needs, particularly in relation to forest and biodiversity conservation. 
V. Skoraj vsi pregledani okoljski projekti so bili pomembni za potrebe države upravičenke in so se pogosto ukvarjali s splošnimi ohranitvenimi potrebami, zlasti z ohranjanjem gozdov in biološke raznovrstnosti.
Project outputs and results achieved have frequently fallen short of objectives. 
Projektni učinki in rezultati pogosto niso dosegli ciljev.
Moreover, the project approach has inherent difficulties in achieving significant impacts and assuring financial viability (paragraphs 47 to 56). 
Poleg tega ima projektni pristop spremljajoče težave pri doseganju pomembnih vplivov in zagotavljanju finančnega obstoja (odstavki 47–56).
Key factors influencing project effectiveness have been overambitious project design, delays in project preparation and implementation, limited progress in building institutional capacity, difficulties in addressing the needs of local communities for development while meeting conservation objectives, projectsŐ insufficient impact on the policy and legal framework, and the unrealistic goals set for financial sustainability after the end of project funding (see paragraphs 57 to 81). 29.9.2006 
Ključni dejavniki, ki so vplivali na uspešnost projektov, so bili preambiciozna zasnova projektov, zamude pri pripravi in izvajanju projektov, omejen napredek pri izgradnji institucionalne zmogljivosti, težave pri reševanju razvojnih potreb lokalnih skupnosti ob doseganju ohranitvenih ciljev, nezadosten vpliv projektov na okvir politike in pravni okvir ter nerealno določeni cilji za finančno trajnost po koncu financiranja projekta (glej odstavke 57–81). 29.9.2006
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/5 VI. 
29.9.2006 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 235/5 VI.
Detailed recommendations on establishing a comprehensive environmental strategy and following up its implementation as well as how to make both environmental mainstreaming and environment projects more effective are given in paragraphs 88 to 101. INTRODUCTION Background 1. 
V odstavkih 88–101 so poleg podrobnih priporočil o vzpostavitvi izčrpne okoljske strategije in spremljanju njenega izvajanja navedeni tudi načini za doseganje večje uspešnosti integracije okolja in okoljskih projektov.
Since the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm the issue of the environment and how to ensure that development is sustainable has become a subject of international concern. 
Vprašanje okolja in način zagotavljanja trajnostnega razvoja je postalo od Konference združenih narodov o človekovem okolju leta 1972 v Stockholmu predmet mednarodne skrbi.
The 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro further raised the profile of the environment and sustainable development, and led to three Multilateral Environment Agreements (MEAs): the Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Convention to Combat Desertification. 
Konferenca Združenih narodov o okolju in razvoju v Riu de Janeiru leta 1992 je še dodatno izpostavila okoljski in trajnostni razvoj, kar je vodilo do treh večstranskih okoljskih sporazumov: Konvencije o spremembi podnebja, Konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti in Konvencije o boju proti dezertifikaciji.
Although in the second half of the 1990s the development agenda refocused to a certain extent on poverty reduction issues, environmental sustainability was chosen as one of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDG) established at the UN Millennium Summit in 2000. 
Čeprav se je v drugi polovici devetdesetih let razvojno dogajanje do določene mere ponovno osredotočilo na vprašanja zmanjševanja revščine, je bila na Vrhu Združenih narodov (UN Millenium Summit) leta 2000 okoljska trajnost izbrana za enega od osmih razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja.
The 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg sought to address both poverty and environment issues. 
Leta 2002 so na Svetovnem vrhu o trajnostnem razvoju v Johannesburgu skušali rešiti vprašanja revščine in varstva okolja.