natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Pillar 1 additional payment for young farmers is based on the assumption that young farmers starting an agricultural activity face financial challenges23. Although this assumption may be true, the Commission’s impact assessment24 did not provide data supporting it or an estimation of the expected impact of this additional payment on the young farmers’ income, on the viability of their holdings or on generational renewal rates, but focused only on the budgetary implications of the different methods proposed for calculating this payment. 
Dodatno plačilo za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra temelji na domnevi, da se mladi kmetje, ki začenjajo kmetijsko dejavnost, srečujejo s finančnimi izzivi.23 Tudi če ta domneva drži, ocena učinka, ki jo je opravila Komisija,24 ni zagotovila nobenih podatkov, ki bi jo podprli, niti ocene pričakovanega učinka tega dodatnega plačila na dohodek mladih kmetov, sposobnost preživetja njihovega kmetijskega gospodarstva ali na raven generacijske pomladitve, temveč se je osredotočila na posledice različnih metod, ki so na voljo za izračun tega plačila, na proračun.
It is not clear what young farmers’ needs this payment should address, other than additional income, and what should be its added value. 
Ni jasno, katere potrebe mladih kmetov poleg dodatnega dohodka naj bi to plačilo obravnavalo in kakšno dodano vrednost naj bi prineslo.
Also at Member State level there were no documents, studies or data explaining why this additional payment was needed or supporting the assumption that young farmers starting an agricultural activity face financial challenges. 
Tudi na ravni držav članic ni bilo dokumentacije, študij ali podatkov, ki bi pojasnjevali, zakaj je potrebno to dodatno plačilo, ali ki bi podpirali domnevo, da se mladi kmetje, ki začenjajo kmetijsko dejavnost, srečujejo s finančnimi izzivi.
In Italy we found some non-representative data at national level showing that the Farm Net Added Value25 was slightly higher (80 000 euro on average) in 2010 for holdings held by farmers under 40 compared to older farmers (73 000 euro). 
Sodišče je v Italiji našlo nereprezentativne podatke na nacionalni ravni, ki so pokazali, da je bila leta 2010 neto dodana vrednost kmetije25 malo večja (v povprečju 80 000 EUR) za gospodarstva, ki so jih vodili kmetje, mlajši od 40 let, v primerjavi s starejšimi kmeti (73 000 EUR).
Nor are there any data showing whether income in the first years of farming activity is generally insufficient or unstable, or more so than in later years. 
Poleg tega ni nobenih podatkov, ki bi kazali na to, da je dohodek v prvih letih kmetijske dejavnosti na splošno nezadosten ali nestabilen ali pa da je bolj nezadosten in nestabilen kot v kasnejših letih.
Regulation (EU) 1307/2013 delegates to Member States some implementation choices, such as fixing a certain budget for the payment or a certain limit on the number of hectares on the basis of which it should be calculated (see also paragraphs 39 to 41). 
1307/2013 so bile na države članice prenesene nekatere odločitve pri izvajanju, kot je določanje proračuna za plačila ali določanje omejitve števila hektarjev, na podlagi katerih bi ga bilo treba izračunati (glej tudi odstavke 39 do 41).
However, there were no documents, studies or data providing sound justification for such choices. 
Ni pa bilo dokumentov, študij ali podatkov, ki bi zagotovili dobro utemeljitev teh odločitev.
23 24 25 Recital 47 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013: “The creation and development of new economic activity in the agricultural sector by young farmers is financially challenging and constitutes an element that should be considered in the allocation and targeting of direct payments”. 
23 24 25 Uvodna izjava 47 Uredbe (EU) št.
The Farm Net Added Value is an income indicator of the Farm Accountancy Data Network, which measures the amount available to pay for all fixed production factors of an agricultural holding (land, labour and capital). 23 
Neto dodana vrednost kmetije je kazalnik dohodka, ki ga uporablja mreža za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov s kmetijskih gospodarstev in s katerim se meri razpoložljivi znesek za plačilo vseh fiksnih proizvodnih dejavnikov kmetijskega gospodarstva (zemljišče, delo in kapital). 23
Pillar 2 23. 
2. steber 23.
The general needs and the decrease in the number of young farmers were mentioned in most of the audited Member States’ programming documents (ex-ante assessments, rural development programmes) relating to the Pillar 2 measure for the setting-up of young farmers. 
Splošne potrebe in zmanjšanje števila mladih kmetov so bili omenjeni v programskih dokumentih večine revidiranih držav članic (predhodne ocene, programi razvoja podeželja), ki se nanašajo na ukrep za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra.
However, the underlying reasons why young people face barriers in terms of accessing land, capital, knowledge, income or services were not sufficiently investigated and were generally not supported by quantifiable evidence. 
Toda razlogi za ovire, s katerimi se mladi srečujejo pri dostopanju do zemljišč, kapitala, znanja, dohodka ali storitev, niso bili dovolj raziskani in večinoma niso bili podprti s količinsko opredeljenimi dokazi.
Partial mismatch between needs and form of support Pillar 1 24. 
Potrebe in oblika podpore so bile deloma neusklajene 1. steber 24.
In the absence of a needs assessment it is unclear which specific needs other than additional income are addressed by the Pillar 1 payment to young farmers. 
Ker ni bilo ocene potreb, ni jasno, katere specifične potrebe, razen dodatnega dohodka, se s plačili za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra pravzaprav obravnavajo.
However, concerning income we could not determine if the need for a higher and more stable income, which should normally be addressed directly by this payment, was dealt with. 
V zvezi z dohodkom nismo mogli ugotoviti, ali je bila potreba po višjem in stabilnejšem dohodku, ki naj bi se neposredno obravnavala s tem plačilom, tudi dejansko obravnavana.
The audited Member States could not provide statistically representative data on young farmers’ incomes or data showing whether their income in the first years of farming is generally insufficient or unstable, or more so than in later years. 
Revidirane države članice niso mogle zagotoviti statistično reprezentativnih podatkov o dohodkih mladih kmetov ali podatkov, ki bi pokazali, ali so njihovi dohodki v prvih letih kmetovanja v splošnem nezadostni ali nestabilni ali bolj nezadostni ali nestabilni kot v poznejših letih.
Concerning the other needs: (a) the need to improve access to land is not directly addressed by this payment, which is only provided to young farmers who already have land; (b) the need for better access to capital is not evident since it is not known if beneficiaries of this payment lack sufficient capital to run a viable holding and/or sufficient access to credit to subsidise investments likely to increase their viability; (c) the need for better access to knowledge is not specifically addressed by this payment, which is provided without requiring a minimum level of agricultural education in most Member States. 
Kar zadeva druge potrebe: (a) to plačilo ne obravnava neposredno potrebe po izboljšanju dostopa do zemljišč, saj ga prejmejo le mladi kmetje, ki že imajo zemljišča; (b) ni očitne potrebe po boljšem dostopu do kapitala, saj ni znano, ali imajo upravičenci do tega plačila dovolj kapitala za vodenje kmetijskega gospodarstva, ki je sposobno preživetja, in/ali zadosten dostop do posojil za subvencioniranje naložb, ki bi verjetno izboljšale sposobnost preživetja njihovih kmetijskih gospodarstev, ali ne; (c) to plačilo ne obravnava posebej potrebe po boljšem dostopu do znanja, saj se v večini držav članic dodeljuje brez zahteve po minimalni stopnji kmetijske izobrazbe. 24
Pillar 2 25. 
2. steber 25.
Under Pillar 2 measure for setting up young farmers the aid is provided in the form of a lump sum (subject to the accomplishment of the business plan), an interest subsidy or a 24 combination of the two. 
Pri ukrepu za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra se pomoč dodeljuje kot enkratno plačilo (pod pogojem, da je uresničen poslovni načrt), kot subvencionirana obrestna mera ali kot kombinacija obeh oblik.
It therefore addresses more directly the specific needs of young farmers, in particular: (a) the need to improve access to land is partially addressed, as farmers could use the lump sum to buy land or could subsidise credit for land purchases; (b) the need for better access to capital is generally addressed, as the farmers can use it for investments likely to increase the viability of their holdings and, in some cases, also to get a subsidised loan; (c) the need for better access to knowledge is generally addressed by this measure, as beneficiaries must have or acquire a minimum level of agricultural education; (d) the need for sufficient and more stable incomes is indirectly addressed by supporting the actions and investments likely to lead to the development of viable holdings. 
Zato se z njo bolj neposredno obravnavajo specifične potrebe mladih kmetov. Podrobneje: (a) potreba po izboljšanju dostopa do zemljišč je obravnavana deloma, saj so lahko kmetje enkratni znesek uporabili za nakup zemljišča ali izkoristili subvencioniranje posojila za nakup zemljišč; (b) potreba po boljšem dostopu do kapitala je v glavnem obravnavana, saj lahko kmetje pomoč uporabijo za naložbe, ki bodo verjetno povečale sposobnost preživetja njihovih kmetijskih gospodarstev, in, v nekaterih primerih, tudi za pridobitev subvencioniranega posojila; (c) to plačilo v splošnem obravnava potrebo po boljšem dostopu do znanja, saj morajo upravičenci do njega imeti minimalno stopnjo kmetijske izobrazbe ali jo pridobiti; (d) potreba po zadostnih in stabilnejših dohodkih je obravnavana posredno, saj se s to pomočjo podpirajo ukrepi in naložbe, ki bodo verjetno prispevali k razvoju kmetijskih gospodarstev, sposobnih preživetja.
Objectives set at general level ... 
Cilji so bili zastavljeni na splošno ...
The common general objective of the support to young farmers under Pillars 1 and 2 at EU level is to facilitate the initial establishment of young farmers and the structural adjustment of their holdings after the initial setting up, with the ultimate aim of increasing viability and favouring generational renewal (see Table 1). ... but the general objective of encouraging generational renewal was not reflected in the objective of Pillar 1 payment to young farmers 27. 
Skupni splošni cilj podpore za mlade kmete v okviru 1. in 2. stebra na ravni EU je olajšati zagon dejavnosti za mlade kmete in strukturno prilagoditev njihovih kmetijskih gospodarstev po začetnem prevzemu gospodarstva, končni cilj pa je izboljšati sposobnost preživetja in spodbujati generacijsko pomladitev (glej tabelo 1). ... vendar splošni cilj spodbujanja generacijske pomladitve ni bil vključen v cilj plačila za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra 27.
Annex IV shows the intervention logic of Pillar 1: the payment to young farmers should contribute to improving agricultural competitiveness and enhancing farm income and, more generally, to achieving the CAP objective of viable food production. 
V Prilogi IV je prikazana interventna logika 1. stebra: plačilo za mlade kmete naj bi prispevalo k izboljšanju kmetijske konkurenčnosti in povečanju dohodkov kmetijskih 25 gospodarstev, ter, splošneje, k doseganju cilja SKP v zvezi s trajnostno proizvodnjo hrane.
However, the general objective of encouraging generational renewal was not reflected in the objective of this payment. 
Vendar splošni cilj spodbujanja generacijske pomladitve v cilj tega plačila ni bil zajet.
(a) not sufficiently specific as there is no description of the expected outcome (e.g. expressed as rate, number, percentage or frequency) or indication of the targeted population of young farmers to support (e.g. in specific geographical areas or financial situations); (b) only partially measurable since it is not known what percentage of the income of young farmers this payment should represent, nor are there any quantifiable targets in terms of the results this payment should generate; (c) not known if the objective is achievable or to what extent is achievable, as it is not sufficiently specific and measurable; (d) not clear to which extent the objective is relevant, as it is not known what young farmers’ needs this payment should address, other than additional income, and how widespread is such need among young farmers starting an agricultural activity (see paragraphs 19 to 22); (e) not timed as it is not defined by when the objective should be achieved. 
Ker ni ocene potreb, za cilj plačila za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra velja, da: (a) je premalo specifičen, saj ni opisa pričakovanega izida (ki bi bil izražen kot stopnja, število, odstotek ali pogostost) ali navedbe ciljne populacije mladih kmetov, katerim je podpora namenjena (npr. na določenih geografskih območjih ali v določenem finančnem položaju); (b) je le delno merljiv, saj ni znano, kolikšen delež dohodka mladih kmetov naj bi to plačilo predstavljalo, prav tako pa ni količinsko opredeljivih ciljnih vrednosti v zvezi z rezultati, ki naj bi se s tem plačilom dosegli; (c) ni znano, ali in v kolikšni meri je dosegljiv, saj ni dovolj specifičen in merljiv; (d) ni jasno, v kolikšni meri je ustrezen, saj ni znano, katere potrebe mladih kmetov, razen dodatnega dohodka, naj bi to plačilo obravnavalo, in kako razširjena je taka potreba med mladimi kmeti, ki začenjajo kmetijsko dejavnost (glej odstavke 19 do 22); (e) ni časovno opredeljen, saj ni določeno, do kdaj bi ga bilo treba doseči.
The general objective of encouraging generational renewal was reflected in the objective of Pillar 2 setting-up measure 29. 
Splošni cilj spodbujanja generacijske pomladitve je bil vključen v cilj ukrepa za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra 29.
At EU level, the objective of the Pillar 2 measure for the setting up of young farmers is to “favour the setting up of adequately skilled farmers in agriculture and, in particular, generational renewal” and contribute to the general CAP objective of viable food production by enhancing farm viability (see Table 1). 
Na ravni EU je cilj ukrepa za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra „spodbujanje prevzema kmetijskih gospodarstev pri ustrezno usposobljenih kmetih in zlasti generacijske pomladitve” in prispevanje k splošnemu cilju SKP v zvezi s trajnostno proizvodnjo hrane s krepitvijo sposobnosti preživetja kmetij (glej tabelo 1).
In addition to this EU-wide objective, the Member States defined in their 2007-2013 RDPs more specific objectives for this measure, such as promoting employment, retaining population in rural areas, improving the competitiveness of the farms, increasing their profitability and using new technologies and improving human capital. 
Dodatno k temu cilju so države članice v svojih programih za razvoj podeželja za obdobje 2007–2013 za ta ukrep opredelile bolj specifične cilje, kot so spodbujanje zaposlovanja, ohranitev prebivalstva na podeželskih območjih, izboljšanje konkurenčnosti kmetij, povečanje njihove donosnosti ter uporaba novih tehnologij in krepitev človeškega kapitala.
We found that the objectives of the Pillar 2 measure for the setting up of young farmers in the four audited Member States were partially SMART, as they were: 26 (a) reasonably specific, as the aim was to support adequately-skilled young farmers and they were often accompanied by a description of an expected result (e.g. “to create added value through diversification and job creation” or “to increase the profitability of farms”); (b) partially measurable, as there was a target indicator in terms of output (absolute number of young farmers to be supported and, in relative terms, percentage of the total number of holdings in a region), but no quantifiable target in terms of expected results, such as the generational renewal rate needed to achieve the objectives (see paragraph 71); (c) partially achievable, since they were achievable in terms of output (number of young farmers to be supported), but it is not known if they were achievable in terms of results and impact on generational renewal; (d) partially relevant, since they were relevant to the general need to support generational renewal. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so bili cilji ukrepa za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra v štirih državah članicah, ki so bile revidirane, deloma skladni z zahtevami SMART, saj so bili: (a) relativno specifični, saj je bila podpora namenjena ustrezno usposobljenim mladim kmetov, pogosto pa so vsebovali tudi opis pričakovanega rezultata (npr. „ustvarjanje dodane vrednosti z diverzifikacijo in ustvarjanjem delovnih mest” ali „povečanje donosnosti kmetij”); (b) delno merljivi, saj so vsebovali kazalnik ciljnih vrednosti za izložke (absolutno število mladih kmetov, ki prejmejo podporo, in relativni odstotek skupnega števila kmetijskih gospodarstev v regiji), vendar ni bilo količinsko opredeljivih ciljnih vrednosti glede pričakovanih rezultatov, kot je na primer stopnja generacijske pomladitve, ki je potrebna za dosego ciljev (glej odstavek 71); (c) delno dosegljivi, saj je bilo mogoče doseči njihove izložke (število mladih kmetov, ki prejmejo podporo), vendar ni znano, ali je bilo mogoče doseči njihove rezultate in vpliv na generacijsko pomladitev; (d) delno ustrezni, saj so bili ustrezni za splošno potrebo po podpori za generacijsko pomladitev.
However, it was often not known to what extent they were relevant to the needs of access to land, capital, knowledge, income or services (see paragraphs 19 and 23); (e) partially timed as there is no deadline by which, for example, a certain rate of young/older farmers should be achieved. 
Vendar pa pogosto ni bilo znano, v kolikšni meri so bili ustrezni za potrebe dostopa do zemljišč, kapitala, znanja, dohodkov ali storitev (glej odstavka 19 in 23); (e) delno časovno opredeljeni, saj ni roka, do katerega bi bilo treba doseči določeno razmerje med mladimi in starejšimi kmeti.
Limited coordination between support measures, though some good practices were identified Little coordination between EU and national measures supporting young farmers 31. 
Kljub samo delni usklajenosti ukrepov podpore so bile ugotovljene nekatere dobre prakse Slaba usklajenost med ukrepi EU in nacionalnimi ukrepi za podporo mladim kmetom 31.
In the four audited Member States we observed limited coordination between the EU and national support measures. 
V vseh štirih revidiranih državah članicah je Sodišče ugotovilo le malo usklajevanja med ukrepi podpore EU in nacionalnimi ukrepi podpore.
More specifically: - In France there is a wide range of national aids in favour of young farmers, such as tax advantages, exemptions from social security contributions, priority access for purchasing agricultural land, and aid for training courses. 
Natančneje: - v Franciji obstaja široka paleta državnih pomoči v korist mladih kmetov, kot so davčne olajšave, oprostitve plačila prispevkov za socialno varnost, prednostni dostop do nakupa kmetijskih zemljišč in pomoč za usposabljanje.
There are information centres to inform potential beneficiaries about the various aids. There are also coordination 27 
Informacijski centri obveščajo morebitne 27 upravičence o različnih oblikah pomoči.
bodies to ensure complementarity between the various aids but no specific coordination mechanisms between the EU and national measures; - In Italy there is some coordination of the scope of the intervention with the national measure providing young farmers an interest subsidy for the purchase of land (an issue only partially addressed by the EU measures) and mechanisms in place to avoid accumulation of this aid with the EU Pillar 2 setting-up measure; there are also tax advantages for which there are no coordination mechanisms with EU measures; - In Poland there are loans with favourable conditions but no coordination mechanisms with EU measures; - In Spain there are loans with favourable conditions and tax advantages having a direct impact on the young farmers’ income, like the Pillar 1 payment to young farmers. 
Obstajajo tudi usklajevalni organi, ki zagotavljajo dopolnjevanje med različnimi pomočmi, vendar ni posebnih mehanizmov za usklajevanje ukrepov EU in nacionalnih ukrepov; - v Italiji se je področje uporabe te intervencije v določeni meri usklajevalo z nacionalnim ukrepom, s katerim se mladim kmetom zagotavljajo subvencionirane obresti za nakup zemljišča (to je vprašanje, ki ga ukrepi EU le delno obravnavajo), vzpostavljeni pa so bili tudi mehanizmi za preprečevanje podvajanja te pomoči z ukrepom za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra. Za nekatere davčne olajšave ni bilo mehanizmov usklajevanja z ukrepi EU; - na Poljskem se ponujajo možnosti najema posojila pod ugodnimi pogoji, vendar ni mehanizmov usklajevanja z ukrepi EU; - v Španiji so na voljo posojila pod ugodnimi pogoji in davčne ugodnosti, ki neposredno vplivajo na dohodke mladih kmetov, enako kot plačilo za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra.
However, there is no coordination mechanism between these aids, which can be cumulated. 
Vendar med temi pomočmi, ki se lahko prejmejo vzporedno, ni mehanizma usklajevanja.
In none of the four audited Member States the authorities have an overview of the different EU and national aids provided to the beneficiaries. 
V nobeni od štirih revidiranih držav članic organi nimajo pregleda nad različnimi pomočmi EU in nacionalnimi pomočmi, ki se dodelijo upravičencem.
There is a risk that some young farmers are over-supported in comparison to their actual needs (e.g. benefitting from the EU Pillar 1 payment to young farmers, Pillar 2 setting-up measures, investments, diversification, training and the various national aids), while others are under-supported. 
Pojavlja se tveganje, da nekateri mladi kmetje prejmejo več podpore, kot je dejansko potrebujejo (npr. plačilo za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra, ukrep za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra, naložbe, diverzifikacija, usposabljanje in različne nacionalne pomoči), drugi pa je prejmejo premalo.
No coordination between Pillar 1 payment to young farmers and Pillar 2 setting-up measure 33. Although the Commission indicated that the 2013 CAP reform was aimed at “increasing the links between the two Pillars, this offering more holistic and integrated approach to policy support”26, in the four audited Member States we did not observe any coordination between the national authorities managing Pillar 1 payment to young farmers and Pillar 2 setting-up measure. 
Čeprav je Komisija navedla, da je bila reforma SKP iz leta 2013 namenjena „krepitvi povezav med obema stebroma, kar bo omogočilo bolj celosten in integriran pristop k politiki 28 zagotavljanja podpore”26, Sodišče v štirih revidiranih državah članicah ni odkrilo nobenega usklajevanja med nacionalnimi organi, ki upravljajo plačila za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra, in tistimi, ki so zadolženi za ukrep za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra.
The two measures are managed by different authorities, according to different rules (see Table 1). 
Ukrepa upravljata različna organa z različnimi pravili (glej tabelo 1).
Good synergy in Pillar 2 between the setting up and the investments measure 34. 
Sinergija med ukrepom za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij in ukrepom za naložbe v okviru 2. stebra je bila dobra 34.
In the four audited Member States we observed different levels of coordination between the Pillar 2 setting-up measure and the investment measure, which generated some synergistic effects. 
Sodišče je v štirih revidiranih državah članicah ugotovilo različne ravni usklajevanja med ukrepom za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij in ukrepom za naložbe v okviru 2. stebra, ki so prinesle nekaj sinergijskih učinkov.