natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The review is structured as follows: o The main principles guiding the allocation process, and an overview of the allocation process o Initial allocations to Member States, comprising a number of different stages o Subsequent adjustments to the initial allocations 9 
Pregled zajema naslednje dele: o glavna načela, na katerih temelji postopek dodelitve, in pregled postopka dodelitve, o prvotne dodelitve državam članicam v okviru več različnih faz, o naknadne prilagoditve prvotnih dodelitev. 9
Allocation principles and overview of process Allocation principles 03 In line with the Treaty objective1, Cohesion policy is designed with the aim of closing the gap between poor and rich European regions. 
Načela dodeljevanja in pregled postopka Načela dodeljevanja 03 V skladu s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije1 je cilj kohezijske politike zmanjšati razkorak med bogatimi in revnimi evropskimi regijami.
Consistent with this policy, the main principle underpinning allocation is that resources are directed towards the poorest countries and regions. 
Glede na to politiko je glavno načelo dodeljevanja usmerjanje sredstev v najrevnejše države in regije.
However, as in previous periods, for the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF) richer regions are not excluded from Cohesion funding. 
Vendar tako kot v prejšnjih obdobjih bogatejše regije tudi v večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2021–2027 niso izključene iz financiranja v okviru kohezijske politike.
According to the Commission, this is because many of the greatest challenges (such as globalisation and the transition to a low carbon economy) increasingly affect many regions across the EU, including more developed ones.2 04 A methodology for allocating funds was put in place for the 2000-2006 programme period3, and the general approach has remained relatively constant since then. 
Po mnenju Komisije je razlog za to dejstvo, da številni največji izzivi (kot so globalizacija in prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo) vse bolj vplivajo na številne regije po vsej EU, tudi bolj razvite.2 04 Metodologija dodelitve denarnih sredstev je bila uvedena za programsko obdobje 2000–20063, splošni pristop pa je od takrat ostal sorazmerno konstanten.
The criterion having the biggest effect on how much Member States and regions receive remains relative wealth4. 
Merilo, ki ima največji vpliv na to, koliko sredstev prejmejo države članice in regije, še naprej ostaja relativna blaginja4.
Other criteria are used in the allocation process, reflecting policy priorities, but these criteria have much less weight. 
Pri postopku dodelitve se uporabljajo še druga merila, ki odražajo prednostne naloge politike, vendar je njihov ponder občutno nižji.
Over previous programme periods, criteria relating to the labour market and education have been used; for the 2021-2027 period, the Commission proposes migration flows and greenhouse gas emissions as additional criteria. 
V prejšnjih programskih obdobjih so bila uporabljena merila v zvezi s trgom dela in izobrazbo, za obdobje 2021–2027 pa Komisija kot dodatni merili predlaga migracijske tokove in emisije toplogrednih plinov.
Annex I provides more details on the evolution of criteria. 
V Prilogi I so navedene dodatne podrobnosti o razvoju meril.
Since the reliability of data and acceptance by the Member States is key, the Commission uses data from Eurostat as the basis for its allocations. 
Ker sta zanesljivost podatkov in sprejemljivost za države članice ključni, Komisija kot podlago za svoje dodelitve uporablja podatke Eurostata.
TFEU article 174. 
Člen 174 PDEU.
EU Commission, Fact Sheet, 29 May 2018 and Impact Assessment 2021-2027, SDW(2018) 283 Final. 
Evropska komisija, Informativni pregled, 29. maj 2018, in ocena učinka za obdobje 2021– 2027, SWD(2018) 283 final.
It is known as the ‘Berlin method’, as it was agreed at the Berlin summit of 1999. 
Imenuje se Berlinski postopek, ker je bila dogovorjena na vrhu v Berlinu leta 1999.
The Commission considers, after an examination of alternative indicators, this measure to be the most neutral and reliable indicator, reflecting the needs and disparities of the regions and Member States. 
Po preučitvi alternativnih kazalnikov Komisija meni, da je ta ukrep najbolj nevtralen in zanesljiv kazalnik potreb regij in držav članic ter razlik med njimi.
See DG REGIO, July 2014 report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, p. 
Glej GD REGIO, poročilo o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji, julij 2014, str.
05 Mechanisms in the form of caps and safety nets are incorporated in the process to ensure that individual Member States’ allocations do not vary too much from one programme period to the next. 
05 Postopek vključuje mehanizme v obliki zgornjih mej in varnostnih mrež, s katerimi se zagotovi, da se dodelitve posameznim državam članicam iz enega programskega obdobja v naslednje ne razlikujejo preveč.
06 The final decisions on MFF allocations take place within a highly political context. 
06 Končne odločitve o dodelitvah v večletnem finančnem okviru se sprejemajo v izrazito političnem kontekstu.
As the MFF is approved by unanimity, the outcome of the allocation process has to be acceptable to the European Parliament and all Member States. 
Ker se večletni finančni okvir sprejema soglasno, se morajo z izidom postopka dodelitve strinjati Evropski parlament in vse države članice.
Extensive negotiations are generally necessary: in previous periods, additional sums have been allocated to Member States outside the application of the relevant formulae. 
Ponavadi so potrebna obsežna pogajanja: v prejšnjih obdobjih so bili državam članicam dodeljeni dodatni zneski brez uporabe ustreznih formul.
The final allocation represents a political compromise. 
Končna dodelitev predstavlja politični kompromis.
Overview of process 07 For the 2021-2027 period, the Commission has included, for the first time, a description of the allocation methodology in the CPR proposal5. The proposal also includes the amounts allocated to the Member States. 
Pregled postopka 07 Za obdobje 2021–2027 je Komisija v predlog uredbe o skupnih določbah prvič vključila opis metodologije dodelitve.5 Predlog vključuje tudi zneske, ki se dodelijo državam članicam.
08 Figure 1 below gives an overview of the Commission’s proposal for translating the total EU resources for the period into allocations for Cohesion policy for each Member State and for each fund. 
08 Na sliki 1 spodaj je prikazan pregled predloga Komisije, iz katerega je razvidno, kako se skupna sredstva EU za obdobje prikažejo kot dodelitve v okviru kohezijske politike za posamezno državo članico in sklad.
All figures quoted in this review are in current prices, unless otherwise indicated. 
Vsi zneski v tem pregledu so navedeni v tekočih cenah, razen če je navedeno drugače.
11 5 Annex XXII of CPR proposal COM(2018) 375 final. 
11 5 Priloga XXII k predlogu uredbe o skupnih določbah, COM(2018) 375 final.
This proposal assumes that the UK leaves the EU at the end of March 2019. 
V predlogu je predvideno, da bo Združeno kraljestvo izstopilo iz EU konec marca 2019.
As at February 2019, the arrangements governing the UK’s potential exit were uncertain. 
Februarja 2019 so bile ureditve v zvezi z morebitnim izstopom Združenega kraljestva negotove.
We have therefore excluded any Brexit-related considerations from this review. 
Sodišče zato v tem pregledu ni upoštevalo razmislekov v zvezi z brexitom.
Figure 1 – The allocation process for Cohesion policy funds EU budget Policies Funds Goals Allocation method Adjustments Final Allocations Source: ECA. 
Slika 1 – Postopek dodelitve denarnih sredstev kohezijske politike 12 Večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2021–2027 = 1 279 mrd.
Erasmus + Cohesion Fund €46.7 bn National Heading 2: Cohesion and Values €442 bn Creative Europe ERDF / ESF + €326.3 bn Regional Others... 
EUR Proračun EU Politike Skladi Cilji Metoda dodelitve Prilagoditve Končne dodelitve Erasmus+ Kohezijski sklad 46,7 mrd. EUR na nacionalni ravni Razdelek 2: Kohezija in vrednote 442 mrd.
Regional /national 12 MFF 2021-2027 = €1 279 bn Note: The financial amounts presented are the Commission’s proposals for 2021-2027. They include funding not directly allocated to Member States (‘transfers’): €11.3 bn transferred from the CF to the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), €1.3 bn for Technical Assistance managed by the Commission (for all the funds), €1.2 bn for the interregional components of the European territorial cooperation goal, €0.6 bn from ERDF to the European Urban Initiative and €0.2 bn for transnational cooperation under the ESF+. 
EUR teritorialno sodelovanje 9,5 mrd. EUR finančna sredstva za najbolj oddaljene in severne redko poseljene regije nacionalne zgornje meje in varnostne mreže ESS+ ESRR Kohezijski sklad Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče Opomba: Predstavljeni finančni zneski so predlogi Komisije za obdobje 2021–2027 in vključujejo finančna sredstva, ki se državam članicam ne dodelijo neposredno (prerazporeditve): 11,3 milijarde EUR, prerazporejene iz Kohezijskega sklada v Instrument za povezovanje Evrope (IPE), 1,3 milijarde EUR za tehnično pomoč, ki jo upravlja Komisija (za vse sklade), 1,2 milijarde EUR za medregionalne komponente v okviru cilja evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje, 0,6 milijarde EUR iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj v evropsko pobudo URBAN in 0,2 milijarde EUR za transnacionalno sodelovanje v okviru ESS+.
09 The first stages in the process are as follows: o The starting point is the overall EU multi-annual budget for the programme period. 
09 Prve faze postopka so: o izhodišče je skupni večletni proračun EU za programsko obdobje.
In May 2018, the Commission published its proposals for the next period, 2021-276. The Commission’s proposal represents an increase in the total budget of 18 % over the previous period, 2014-2020 (from €1 087 billion to €1 279 billion). 
Maja 2018 je Komisija objavila svoje predloge za naslednje obdobje (2021–2027).6 Predlog Komisije predstavlja povečanje skupnega proračuna za 18 % v primerjavi s prejšnjim obdobjem, tj. obdobjem 2014–2020, (s 1 087 milijard EUR na 1 279 milijard EUR).
This is equivalent to 5 % after adjustments7. COM(2018) 322 final and COM(2018) 321 final. 
Po prilagoditvah to predstavlja povečanje za 5 %,7 COM(2018) 322 final in COM(2018) 321 final.
ECA Briefing paper July 2018 “The Commission’s proposal for the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework”, paragraphs 4 and 6. 
Informativni dokument Evropskega računskega sodišča – Predlog Komisije za večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2021–2027, julij 2018, odstavka 4 in 6.
Adjustments include the need to take account of inflation and Brexit. 
Pri potrebnih prilagoditvah sta bila upoštevana inflacija in brexit.
o Within that total figure, the Commission proposes to allocate €442 billion to ‘Cohesion and values’; and within that, €373 billion to Cohesion policy (10 % less than the previous period). 
o Komisija predlaga, da se znotraj skupnega zneska dodeli 442 milijard EUR za razdelek Kohezija in vrednote, v okviru njega pa 373 milijard EUR za kohezijsko politiko (10 % manj kot v prejšnjem obdobju).
The allocation of this latter sum is the subject of this review. 
V tem poročilu se obravnava dodelitev zadnjega zneska.
Three funds contribute to Cohesion policy: the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+); and the Cohesion Fund (CF). o Of the total Cohesion policy funding, the EU earmarked €46.7 billion for the CF, with the ERDF/ESF+, which are allocated together initially, accounting for the rest. o For the ERDF/ESF+ total of €326.3 billion, the EU has two goals: Investment for jobs and growth, accounting for the bulk, and European territorial cooperation. 
H kohezijski politiki prispevajo trije skladi: Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR), Evropski socialni sklad plus (ESS+) in Kohezijski sklad, o od skupnih finančnih sredstev kohezijske politike je EU predvidela 46,7 milijarde EUR za Kohezijski sklad, preostanek pa za ESRR/ESS+, za katera se sredstva sprva dodeljujejo skupaj, o EU ima v zvezi s skupnim zneskom 326,3 milijarde EUR za ESRR/ESS+ dva cilja: naložbe za delovna mesta in rast, kateremu se dodeli večina sredstev, in evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje.
A small amount (€1.6 billion) within the first goal is allocated to support ‘outermost and northern sparsely populated regions’. 
V okviru prvega cilja se majhen znesek (1,6 milijarde EUR) dodeli za podporo najbolj oddaljenim in severnim redko poseljenim regijam.
10 The next stage is the first point at which allocations to individual Member States are determined – either to the country as a whole or to regions within it. 
10 Na naslednji stopnji se prvič določijo dodelitve posameznim državam članicam – bodisi državi kot celoti bodisi regiji posamezne države.
Different processes are used for the initial allocation of different elements of the total Cohesion funding available, as set out in the following sections and presented in Annex II. 
Za prvotno dodelitev različnih elementov v okviru skupnih finančnih sredstev kohezijske politike, ki so na voljo, se uporabijo različni postopki, opredeljeni v nadaljevanju in predstavljeni v Prilogi II.
The final section within this part of the review covers subsequent adjustments, including caps and safety nets and the allocation to ESF+. 
Zadnji razdelek tega dela pregleda zajema naknadne prilagoditve, vključno z zgornjimi mejami in varnostnimi mrežami ter dodelitvami za ESS+.
Throughout the document, we use a number of worked examples, based on fictitious Member States or regions, to illustrate the calculations. 
Sodišče v dokumentu za prikaz izračunov uporablja številne primere izračunov, ki temeljijo na fiktivnih državah članicah ali regijah.
Initial allocation to Member States Allocation for Investment for Jobs and Growth goal 11 Different processes are used to allocate funding related to the two goals of ERDF/ESF+. 
Prvotne dodelitve državam članicam Dodelitve za cilj naložbe za delovna mesta in rast 11 Za dodelitev finančnih sredstev v zvezi s ciljema ESRR/ESS+ se uporabljajo različni postopki.
(3) Regions can benefit from additional premiums relating to socio-economic and environmental factors: unemployment and youth unemployment specifically, educational attainment, greenhouse gas emissions and migration – see Annex III (c). The Commission measures wealth using gross domestic product (GDP), and gross national income (GNI), with or without adjustments to reflect purchasing power. 
V okviru prvega cilja, naložbe za rast in delovna mesta, je pomembno merilo relativna blaginja regij.8 Komisija za obdobje 2021–2027 predlaga naslednjo kategorizacijo (glej Prilogo X): Komisija meri blaginjo na podlagi bruto domačega proizvoda (BDP) in bruto nacionalnega dohodka (BND), in sicer s prilagoditvami za upoštevanje kupne moči ali brez njih.
These terms are explained in the Glossary. 
Ti pojmi so opredeljeni v glosarju.
15 13 A worked example of the process for less developed regions, for a fictitious region, is in Table 1. 
13 V tabeli 1 je prikazan primer izračuna za fiktivno regijo v skladu s postopkom za manj razvite regije.
Table 1 – Worked example of calculating less developed regions’ individual allocation Region Step (1) (1) Regional GDP per capita €15 000 (2) EU GDP per capita €25 000 (3) Prosperity gap = (2)-(1) €10 000 (4) Region's population 3 500 000 (5) Initial theoretical amount = (3) x (4) x 7 years €245 bn Step (2) National GNI per capita 90 % of the EU average (6) Corresponding coefficient (see Annex IIIb) 1.3 % (7) Individual allocation = (5) x (6) €3 185 m Premium 1 Unemployment Number of people unemployed (a) 300 000 Rate of unemployment (b) 13.2 % Average for less developed regions (c) 13.5 % Number of people exceeding the average 0 (8) Premium amount = (d) x €500 x 7 years €0 Step (3) (example for 3 premiums) Premium 2 Youth Unemployment Number of young people unemployed (a) 60 000 Rate of youth unemployment (b) 35.0 % Average for less developed regions (c) 32.6 % Number of people exceeding the average (if b>c) (d) = (a) - [(a)/(b)x(c)] 4 114 (9) Premium amount = (d) x €500 x 7 years €14.4 m Premium 3 Greenhouse gas emissions National CO2 emissions (a) t 200 m 2030 target (b) t 175 m Amount exceeding the target (if a>b) (c) = (a) - (b) t 25 m Region's share within national population (d) 10.0 % (10) Premium amount = (c) x (d) x €1 x 7 years €17.5 m Allocation for 2021-2027 = (7) + (8) + (9) + (10) €3 216.9 m Source: ECA based on Commission’s CPR Proposal, Annex XXII, 1a. to g. Note: This is not the complete allocation process, as the example does not show the allocation of all premiums. 
EUR premija 3 emisije toplogrednih plinov nacionalne emisije CO2 (a) 200 mio. t cilj za leto 2030 (b) 175 mio. t znesek, s katerim je bil prekoračen cilj (če a > b) (c) = (a) – (b) 25 mio. t Delež regije v številu prebivalcev države članice (d) 10,0 % (10) znesek premije = (c) x (d) x 1 EUR x 7 let 17,5 mio. EUR Dodelitev za obdobje 2021–2027 = (7) + (8) + (9) + (10) 3 216,9 mio. EUR Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi točk 1(a) do (g) Priloge XXII k predlogu Komisije za uredbo o skupnih določbah Opomba: To ni popoln postopek dodelitve, saj s primerom ni prikazana dodelitev vseh premij.
Transition regions 14 The Commission proposes that for 2021-2027, transition regions are those where the GDP per capita is between 75 % and 100 % of the EU average9. For the 2014-2020 period, the equivalent was 75 % - 90 % of the EU average; regions in the 90%-100 % 9 Art.102-2.b of the Commission’s CPR Proposal (COM(2018) 375 final). 
Regije v prehodu 14 Komisija za obdobje 2021–2027 predlaga, da so regije v prehodu tiste regije, katerih BDP na prebivalca je med 75 % in 100 % povprečja EU.9 Za obdobje 2014–2020 so bile enakovredne regije tiste regije, katerih BDP na prebivalca je bil med 75 % in 90 % povprečja EU; regije v kategoriji od 90 % do 100 % so bile prej uvrščene kot bolj razvite regije – glej odstavek 16 spodaj.
This change considerably widens the population covered by this category, from under 15 % to over 25 % of the EU population. 
S to sprememba je bil delež prebivalstva, ki ga zajema ta kategorija, znatno povečan, in sicer z manj kot 15 % na več kot 25 % prebivalstva EU.
The effect of moving from more developed to transition status is that the regions in question tend to receive more cohesion funding. 
prehodu, ponavadi pomeni, da te regije prejmejo več kohezijskih finančnih sredstev.
The Commission justifies this change by the persistence of structural challenges for middle-income regions, which are being progressively caught up by less prosperous but fast developing regions10 while still being outdistanced by the more developed regions. 
Komisija to spremembo utemeljuje z nadaljnjimi strukturnimi izzivi za regije s srednjim dohodkom, ki jih postopoma dohajajo manj bogate, toda hitreje razvijajoče se regije10, pri čemer pa še vedno močno zaostajajo za bolj razvitimi regijami.
The countries mostly affected by this modification are Finland, France, Germany, Slovenia and the Netherlands. 
Med državami, na katere ta sprememba najbolj vpliva, so Finska, Francija, Nemčija, Slovenija in Nizozemska.
Within this extension of the range of transition regions, the mechanics of the allocation process proposed for 2021-2027 are broadly similar to 2014-2020. 15 There are four steps involved in the allocation, illustrated in Annex IV: (1) A minimum level of support (€18 per head each year), before premiums, is determined. This is the theoretical initial amount per head that the region would receive if it were more developed11. 
V okviru tega razširjenega kroga regij v prehodu postopek dodelitve, predlagan za obdobje 2021–2027, na splošno ostaja podoben tistemu za obdobje 2014–2020. 15 V Prilogi IV so prikazani štirje koraki dodeljevanja: (1) določi se najmanjša raven pomoči (18 EUR na prebivalca letno) pred premijami, ki predstavlja teoretični prvotni znesek na prebivalca, ki bi ga regija prejela, če bi bila bolj razvita;11 (2) izračuna se najvišja raven pomoči pred premijami, ki predstavlja 60 % dodelitve na prebivalca, ki bi jo regija prejela, če bi bila manj razvita (odstavek 12) in imela BDP na prebivalca v višini 75 % povprečja EU;12 (3) pomoč za zadevno regijo se nato določi na podlagi relativnega BDP regije na prebivalca v primerjavi s povprečjem EU, pri čemer se upoštevata zgoraj navedeni najnižji in najvišji znesek.
A worked example is presented in Figure 2, for a region with a GDP per capita of 87.8 % of the EU average; the Figure shows that this region would receive €50 a head each year. (4) Member States can benefit from the same additional premiums as is the case for less developed regions (Annex III (c)), relating to socio-economic and environmental factors: unemployment and youth unemployment specifically, educational attainment, greenhouse gas emissions and migration. 
Na sliki 2 je prikazan primer izračuna za regijo z BDP na prebivalca v višini 87,8 % povprečja EU, po katerem bi regija prejela 50 EUR na prebivalca letno; (4) tako kot pri manj razvitih regijah so lahko države članice upravičene do enakih dodatnih premij (Priloga III(c)) na podlagi različnih socialno-ekonomskih in okoljskih dejavnikov: brezposelnost in zlasti brezposelnost mladih, stopnja izobrazbe, emisije toplogrednih plinov in migracije.
10 P. 198 of the Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, DG REGIO, July 2014. 
16 10 GD REGIO, Šesto poročilo o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji, julij 2014, str. 198.
11 Commission’s CPR Proposal, Annex XXII, 2.a and 3. 12 Ibid, 1.a and b. 
11 Točka 2(a) in točka 3 Priloge XXII k predlogu Komisije za uredbo o skupnih določbah.
16 Note: The graph illustrates how, for this region, its wealth of 87.8 % of the EU average results in an allocation per head of €50 a year. 
Bolj razvite regije 16 Bolj razvite regije so regije, katerih BDP na prebivalca presega povprečje EU.13 Metodologija dodelitve se razlikuje od zgoraj opisanih, vendar pa na splošno ostaja podobna metodologiji za obdobje 2014–2020.
The allocation methodology differs from those previously described but remains broadly similar to that in place for 2014-2020. As illustrated in Annex V (a), there are three steps: (1) The Commission calculates the total funding for more developed regions by multiplying an amount per person per year by the population of those regions. 
V Prilogi V(a) so prikazani trije koraki: (1) Komisija izračuna skupna finančna sredstva za bolj razvite regije tako, da letni znesek na prebivalca pomnoži s številom prebivalcev teh regij; (2) od tega skupnega zneska se posamezni regiji dodeli znesek, ki temelji na podatkih v zvezi s sedmimi demografskimi in socialno-ekonomskimi kazalniki.
These indicators have different weightings, ranging from the 20 % for population and educational attainment, to 2.5 % for population density. 
Ti imajo različne ponderje, od 20 % za prebivalstvo in stopnjo izobrazbe do 2,5 % za gostoto prebivalstva.
The indicators and their weighting are in Annex V (b). 
Kazalniki in njihovi ponderji so navedeni v Prilogi V(b).
The share for each region is calculated for each indicator and 17 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Maximum allocation per head x Region B Minimum allocatio n per head 80 € 50 € 18 € 75 % 80 % 85 % 87.8 % 90 % 95 % 100 % GDP per capita expressed in relation to the EU average 13 Art.102-2.c of the Commission’s CPR Proposal (COM(2018) 375). 
Delež posamezne regije se izračuna za vsak kazalnik in pomnoži s skupnimi finančnimi sredstvi, ki so na voljo, da se določi dodelitev posamezni regiji. V tabeli 2 je prikazan primer izračuna za to metodo za prvi kazalnik; 17 8 najvišja d 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 odelitev na prebivalca x regija B najnižja dodelitev na prebivalca 13 Člen 102(2)(c) predloga Komisije za uredbo o skupnih določbah (COM(2018) 375 final).
(3) As a last step, premiums related to greenhouse gas emissions and migration can be added, if applicable, using the same processes as for less developed and transition regions. 
(3) pri zadnjem koraku se lahko prištejejo premije, povezane z emisijami toplogrednih plinov in migracijami, če je to primerno, in sicer v skladu z enakimi postopki kot za manj razvite regije in regije v prehodu.