natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission has also found some cases in Hungary where LPIS was not updated with the results of the on-the-spot checks and has requested the Hungarian authorities in writing to take action in this respect. 
Komisija je odkrila tudi primere na Madžarskem, kjer se LPIS ni posodabljal z rezultati pregledov na kraju samem, in je od madžarskih organov pisno zahtevala sprejetje primernih ukrepov.
3.21. For SPS aid to be granted, every entitlement held by the farmer needs to be declared together with one hectare of eligible land. 
3.21 Za odobritev pomoči iz SEP mora biti vsaka plačilna pravica kmeta prijavljena skupaj s hektarjem upravičenega zemljišča.
The Court has observed that this principle is not respected in certain circumstances in Austria (see example 3.5). _____________ (22) The Court had already observed in its 2008 Annual Report (paragraph 5.38) that in Romania 5 500 farmers had benefited from a total of 2,2 million euro in EU SAPS aid as a result of the incorrect application of the obvious error concept. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da v Avstriji v nekaterih okoli­ ščinah ne upoštevajo tega načela (glej primer 3.5). _____________ (22) Sodišče je že v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2008 (odstavek 5.38) ugotovilo, da je v Romuniji zaradi napačne uporabe pojma očitne napake 5 500 kmetov dobilo skupaj 2,2 milijona EUR pomoči iz SEPP.
(23) The Court has already made this observation for Spain in Annual Reports for 2008, paragraph 5.36, for 2009, paragraph 3.38, and for 2010, paragraph 3.31, and for Italy in the 2009 Annual Report, paragraph 3.38. 
(23) Sodišče je to opažanje za Španijo izreklo že v letnih poročilih za leto 2008, odstavek 5.36, za leto 2009, odstavek 3.38, in za leto 2010, odstavek 3.31, za Italijo pa v letnem poročilu za leto 2009, odstavek 3.38.
3.21. The Commission has so far imposed 0,214 million euro in financial corrections on Austria concerning entitlements for alpine pastures in claim years 2005, 2006 and 2007 in the context of the conformity clearance procedure. 
Komisija je doslej Avstriji v okviru postopka potrjevanja skladnosti naložila finančne popravke v višini 0,214 milijona EUR, in sicer v povezavi s pravicami za alpske pašnike v letih vložitve zahtevkov 2005, 2006 in 2007.
See also joint reply to points 3.14 and 3.15. 
3.21 Glej tudi skupni odgovor na odstavka 3.14 in 3.15.
EN C 344/82 Official Journal T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S of the European Union 12.11.2012 T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S Example 3.5 — Incorrect activation of entitlements In Austria, when an applicant claiming Alpine pasture areas does not have enough hectares to activate all entitlements the national authorities, contrary to EU legislation, reduce the number of applicant’s entitlements (to match it with the number of hectares) and increase their values proportionately (24). 
SL C 344/82 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 12.11.2012 O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E Primer 3.5 – Napačno uveljavljanje pravic V Avstriji nacionalni organi za vlagatelja zahtevka, ki je prijavil alpske pašnike in nima dovolj hektarjev, da bi uveljavil vse pravice, v nasprotju z zakonodajo EU znižajo število vlagateljevih pravic (da se ujema s številom hektarjev) in sorazmerno povečajo njihovo vrednost (24).
Example 3.5 — Incorrect activation of entitlements See reply to point 3.21. 
Primer 3.5 – Napačno uveljavljanje pravic Glej odgovor na odstavek 3.21.
3.22. Allpaymententitlementsshouldberecordedinthe entitlement database the total value of which must not exceed a ceiling laid down in EU legislation. 
3.22 Vse pravice do plačila bi morale biti evidentirane v podatkovni zbirki pravic, njihova skupna vrednost pa ne sme presegati zgornje meje, določene v zakonodaji EU.
In two Member States the Court found inaccurate information in the entitlements databases due to the incorrect treatment of unused entitle­ ments (25) (Denmark) and to differences between regional and central databases (Spain) (26). 
Sodišče je v dveh državah članicah v podatkovnih zbirkah pravic odkrilo nepravilne informacije, ki so nastale zaradi nepravilne obrav­ nave neizkoriščenih pravic (25) (Danska) in razlik med regio­ nalno in centralno podatkovno zbirko (Španija) (26).
Control systems based on physical on-the-spot checks 3.23. The quality of the on-the-spot measurements is of key importance for the correct determination of aid amounts. 
Kontrolni sistemi, ki temeljijo na fizičnih pregledih na kraju samem 3.23 Kakovost meritev na kraju samem je bistvenega pomena za pravilno določitev zneskov pomoči.
The Court has re-performed a number of measurements carried out by the paying agencies. 
Sodišče je ponovilo več meritev, ki so jih opravile plačilne agencije.
In three Member States the Court’s measurements differed from the results reported by the paying agencies (in Denmark for five out of 18, in both Spain (Galicia) and Finland for four out of 21 measurements). 
V treh državah članicah so se rezultati njegovih meritev razliko­ vali od rezultatov, ki so jih sporočile plačilne agencije (na Danskem pri petih od 18 meritev, v Španiji (Galicija) in na Finskem pa za po štiri od 21 meritev).
Procedures to ensure recovery of undue payments 3.24. TheCourtexaminedtheaccountingrecordsofthe paying agencies audited to establish if the amounts to be recovered are properly accounted for and if these amounts are correctly reported to the Commission. 
Postopki za zagotavljanje izterjave neupravičenih plačil 3.24 Sodišče je pregledalo računovodske evidence revidi­ ranih plačilnih agencij, da bi ugotovilo, ali so zneski, ki jih je treba izterjati, ustrezno evidentirani in pravilno sporočeni Komisiji.
In Denmark the Court could not reconcile the amounts reported with underlying records. _____________ (24) The Court has raised this issue already in its 2006 Annual Report (paragraph 5.23). 
Komisija bo napredek spremljala v okviru postopka potrditve sklad­ nosti. _____________ (24) Sodišče je to zadevo omenilo že v letnem poročilu za leto 2006 (odstavek 5.23).
(25) EU legislation provides that entitlements not activated during two consecutive years revert back to the national reserve, see Article 42 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
(25) Zakonodaja EU določa, da se pravice, ki niso bile uveljavljene v obdobju dveh zaporednih let, povrnejo v nacionalno rezervo, glej člen 42 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
(26) This issue has already been reported by the Court in its 2008 Annual Report (paragraph 5.37). 
(26) Sodišče je o tej zadevi že poročalo v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2008 (odstavek 5.37).
The Commission services share the view of the Court that the quality of on-the-spot checks is important. 
3.22 3.23 Službe Komisije soglašajo z mnenjem Sodišča, da je kako­ vost pregledov na kraju samem pomembna.
Audits carried out by the Commission services have identified similar deficiencies in the quality of the on-the-spot checks, and the weaknesses found are followed up through conformity clearance procedures which ensure that the risk to the EU budget is adequately covered. 
Revizije, ki so jih izvajale službe Komisije, so razkrile podobne pomanjkljivosti v kakovosti pregledov na kraju samem, odkrite slabosti pa se nadalje obravnavajo s postopki potrditve skladnosti, ki zagotavljajo, da je tveganje za proračun EU ustrezno krito.
Following Commission audits, the Spanish authorities presented an LPIS Improvement Plan in November 2010 including measures to improve the quality of on-the-spot checks. 
Po revizijah, ki jih je izvedla Komisija, so španski organi novembra 2010 predstavili načrt za izboljšanje sistema LPIS, ki vključuje ukrepe za boljšo kakovost pregledov na kraju samem.
These measures are in effect as from claim year 2012. 3.24. 
Ti ukrepi se uporabljajo od leta vložitve zahtevkov 2012.
The Commission shares the Court’s assessment that four out of the six systems audited were effective and two partially effective (see Annex 3.2). 
3.24 Komisija se strinja z oceno Sodišča, da so bili štirje od šestih revidiranih sistemov uspešni, dva pa delno uspešna (glej Prilogo 3.2).
The Commission also considers that the debts management and recovery systems have improved in the last years, not least due to the introduction in 2006 of the so-called 50/50 rule, which gives a strong incentive to Member States to recover undue payments as effectively and as quickly as possible. 
Komisija meni tudi, da so se sistemi za upravljanje in izterjavo dolgov v zadnjih letih izboljšali, kar gre pripisati tudi uvedbi tako imenovanega pravila 50/50 v letu 2006, ki države članice učinkovito spodbuja h kar se da uspešni in hitri izterjavi neupravičenih plačil.
This is the reason why the Commission has proposed a ‘100 % rule’ for the 2014-2020 period (i.e. 100 % of unrecovered amounts after a four or eight-year delay — depending on whether the case is under administrative or judicial procedure — will be charged to the Member States concerned) (1). _____________ (1) Article 56(2) of SEC(2011) 1153. 
Iz tega razloga je Komisija za obdobje 2014–2020 predlagala pravilo 100 % (tj. po preteku štirih ali osmih let – odvisno od tega, ali se zadeva obravnava v upravnem ali sodnem postopku – se 100 % neizterjanih zneskov zaračuna zadevni državi članici) (1). _____________ (1) Člen 56(2) – SEC(2011) 1153.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/83 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S In the specific case of Denmark, the Certifying body also identified some reconciliation issues with regard to recovered amounts or between the reporting to the Commission through the Annex III tables and the paying agency’s debtors’ ledger. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/83 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E V primeru Danske je imel tudi certifikacijski organ nekaj težav z usklajevanjem glede izterjanih zneskov ali med poročanjem Komisiji s tabelami v Prilogi III in knjigo terjatev plačilne agencije.
The Commission will review the compliance with the accreditation criteria and the infrastructure and control systems put in place. 
Komisija bo pregledala skladnost z akreditacijskimi merili ter vzpostavljenimi infrastrukturnimi in kontrolnimi sistemi.
The Commission's supervisory system and management representation 3.25. TheCommissionbasesitsassessmentofthelegality and regularity of expenditure for the policy area on four building blocks: — an assessment of the proper functioning of management and control systems, — the results of its own audits, — the follow-up of previous years’ reservations and action plans, — the assurance received from other authorising officers in cases of sub-delegation. 
Nadzorni sistem in poslovodska predstavitev Komisije 3.25 OcenaKomisijeozakonitostiinpravilnostiodhodkov na tem področju politike temelji na naslednjih štirih elementih: — oceni pravilnega delovanja upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov, — rezultatih revizij, ki jih je opravila sama, — spremljanju pridržkov in akcijskih načrtov iz prejšnjih let, — zagotovilu, pridobljenem od drugih odredbodajalcev, v primerih nadaljnjega prenosa.
3.26. TheCourthasanalysedinparticulartheCommissions assessment of the proper functioning of management and control systems as described in its 2011 Annual Activity Report. 
3.26 Sodišče je analiziralo zlasti oceno Komisije o pravilnem delovanju upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov v njenem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2011.
The Commission’s assessment of the proper functioning of management and control systems 3.27. ThekeyelementsfortheCommission’sassessmentof the efficiency of the management at Member State level are the statements of assurance given by heads of paying agencies on the legality and regularity of underlying transactions and the audit work performed on them by certification bodies. 
Ocena Komisije o pravilnem delovanju upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov 3.27 Glavni elementi ocene Komisije o učinkovitosti upra­ vljanja na ravni držav članic so izjave o zanesljivosti, ki jih izdajo vodje plačilnih agencij v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravil­ nostjo z izkazi povezanih transakcij, ter revizijsko delo, ki so ga v zvezi z njimi opravili certifikacijski organi.
3.27. As stated in DG AGRI’s Annual Activity Report, the Commission assesses the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions on the basis of findings and indicators which can be summarised in three assurance blocks: (1) the functioning of the paying agencies; (2) the control results at the level of the final beneficiaries; and (3) the Commission’s conformity audits on Member States’ management and control systems. 
3.27 Kot navaja letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD AGRI, Komisija zakonitost in pravilnost osnovnih transakcij ocenjuje na podlagi ugotovitev in kazalnikov, ki jih je mogoče povzeti v treh sklopih zagotovil: 1. delovanje plačilnih agencij; 2. rezultati kontrol na ravni končnih upravičencev ter 3. revizije skladnosti upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov držav članic, ki jih je izvedla Komisija.
EN C 344/84 Official Journal T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.28. For2011theCommissionreportsthatforEAGF all 81 statements of assurance delivered by heads of paying agencies were unqualified and that all but one (Spain (Cantabria)) opinions given by the respective certification bodies were also unqualified(27). 
SL C 344/84 Uradni list Evropske unije U G OT OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 12.11.2012 3.28 Komisija za leto 2011 poroča, da je bilo za EKJS vseh 81 izjav o zanesljivosti, ki so jih izdali vodje plačilnih agencij, brez pridržkov in da so bila brez pridržkov tudi vsa mnenja posameznih certifikacijskih organov razen enega (Španija (Kantabrija)) (27).
The certification bodies perform their audits on the basis of Commission guidelines under a ‘standard’ or, on a voluntary basis, ‘reinforcement of assurance’ procedure involving additional checks. 
Certifikacijski organi izvajajo revizije na podlagi smernic Komisije v okviru „standardnega“ postopka ali pa na podlagi postopka „okrepitve zagotovila“ z dodatnimi pregledi, ki pa je prostovoljen.
The standard audit requirements for certification bodies 3.29. The certification bodies check the accreditation criteria for the paying agencies, assess the internal control system, validate the compilation of inspection statistics and form an opinion on the statement of assurance given by the heads of the paying agencies. 
Standardne revizijske zahteve za certifikacijske organe 3.29 Certifikacijskiorganipreverijoakreditacijskamerilaza plačilne agencije, ocenijo sistem notranje kontrole, potrdijo zbrane statistične podatke inšpekcijskih pregledov in pripravijo mnenje o izjavah o zanesljivosti, ki jih izdajo vodje plačilnih agencij.
3.30. Inits2011AARtheCommissionstatesthat91%of the certification bodies had audited the compilation of inspection statistics for EAGF-IACS and that 92 % of them concluded positively, i.e. that errors in the compilation of statistics amount to less than 2 %. 
3.30 Komisija je v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2011 navedla, da je 91 % certifikacijskih organov revidi­ ralo zbrane statistične podatke inšpekcijskih pregledov za EKJS-IAKS in da jih je 92 % prišlo do pozitivnega zaključka, in sicer da napake v zbranih statističnih podatkih znašajo manj kot 2 %.
Therefore, only 84 % of paying agencies’ statistics have been validated by the certifi­ cation bodies. 3.31. 
Zato so certifikacijski organi potrdili le 84 % statističnih podatkov plačilnih agencij.
According to the Commission guidelines, the vali­ dation of inspection statistics by the certification bodies is based on a review of a sample of 20 control reports (28). It does not however cover the completeness of the inspection statistics or the correct reporting of the results (29). 3.32. 
3.31 V skladu s smernicami Komisije potrditev statističnih podatkov inšpekcijskih pregledov, za katero so odgovorni certifikacijski organi, temelji na pregledu vzorca 20 kontrolnih poročil (28), ne zajema pa popolnosti teh podatkov ali pravil­ nega poročanja o rezultatih (29).
Inassessingthequalityofon-the-spotinspectionsthe Commission guidelines allow the certification bodies to either accompany or to re-perform on-the-spot inspections. 
3.32 SmerniceKomisijepriocenjevanjukakovostiinšpekcij­ skih pregledov na kraju samem dovoljujejo certifikacijskim organom, da te preglede spremljajo ali pa jih ponovijo.
Based on its experience, the Court considers that the quality of inspections would improve if certification bodies were required systematically to re-perform previous inspections (30). of the European Union T H E 12.11.2012 _____________ (27) No certification body reports have been received for the two Romanian paying agencies. 
V takih primerih so dobra alternativa inšpekcijski pregledi, ki jih spremljajo certifikacijski organi. Poleg tega so dodatno koristni, ker s preprečevanjem kopičenja kontrol zmanjšujejo upravno obremenitev kmetov. _____________ (27) Za dve romunski plačilni agenciji niso bila prejeta nobena poročila certifikacijskih organov.
(28) The Commission guidelines provide for a review of a minimum sample of 20 inspection reports for IACS area aid and another sample of 20 for IACS animal premium measures. 
(28) Smernice Komisije določajo pregled vzorca vsaj 20 poročil o inšpekcijskih pregledih za področje IAKS in še enega vzorca 20 poročil za premije za živali, povezane z IAKS.
(29) A full match between random samples selected and reported in the statistics is a prerequisite for any meaningful assessment of the residual error rate in the payments made. 
(29) Naključni vzorci, ki so bili izbrani, se morajo v celoti ujemati s poročanjem o njih v statističnih podatkih, kar je predpogoj za vsako smiselno oceno stopnje preostale napake v izvršenih plačilih.
(30) See also the 2010 Annual Report, paragraph 3.46. 
(30) Glej tudi letno poročilo za leto 2010, odstavek 3.46.
They also have the additional benefit of reducing the administrative burden on the farmer by avoiding an accumulation of controls. Compared to previous years, DG AGRI adopted a stricter approach in its Annual Activity Report regarding the work done and conclusions drawn from the certification bodies’ work: only in case the certification body performed all required work was it considered in the evaluation of the work. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E V primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti je GD AGRI v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih uporabil strožji pristop v povezavi z opra­ vljenim delom in sklepi na osnovi dela certifikacijskih organov: certi­ fikacijski organ je v oceno dela zajet samo, če je opravil vse potrebno delo.
EN 12.11.2012 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion C344/85 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.33. Furthermore, several certification body reports indicate that the Commission requested further clarifica­ tions (31) by the paying agencies with regard to the inspection statistics initially submitted. 
SL 12.11.2012 UradnilistEvropskeunije C344/85 U G O T OV I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.33 Poleg tega poročila več certifikacijskih organov nava­ jajo, da je Komisija zahtevala nadaljnja pojasnila (31) plačilnih agencij o statističnih podatkih inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki so jih prvotno predložile.
Potential amendments to the inspection statistics resulting from these requests are not analysed in the context of certification body audits. The new reinforcement of assurance procedure 3.34. 
Morebitne spremembe statističnih poda­ tkov inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki nastanejo zaradi takšnih zahtev, se pri revizijah, ki jih opravljajo certifikacijski organi, ne analizirajo.
In2010theCommissionintroducedonavoluntary basis (32) a new control framework called ‘Reinforcement of assurance on the legality and regularity of the transactions at the level of the final beneficiaries through the work of the certification bodies’. 
Novi postopek okrepitve zagotovila 3.34 Komisijajeleta2010uvedlanovprostovoljni(32) okvir kontrole, imenovan „okrepitev zagotovila o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij na ravni končnih upravičencev z delom certifikacijskih organov“.
The reinforcement exercise requires the certification body to re-perform, for each paying agency and each of the four expenditure populations, EAGF-IACS, EAGF-non-IACS, EAFRD-IACS and EAFRD-non-IACS, the check of a representative sample of transactions which the paying agency has checked on the spot. 
Okrepitev zahteva, da certifi­ kacijski organ za vsako plačilno agencijo in vsako od štirih populacij odhodkov, EKJS-IAKS, EKJS-ne-IAKS, EKSRP-IAKS in EKSRP-ne-IAKS, ponovi pregled reprezentativnega vzorca transakcij, ki jih je plačilna agencija pregledala na kraju samem.
3.35. If the Commission considers that Member States apply this procedure correctly, financial corrections in the context of the clearance of accounts will be limited to the error rate derived from the inspection statistics certified. 
3.35 Če Komisija meni, da so države članice ta postopek uporabile pravilno, bodo finančni popravki pri potrjevanju obračunov omejeni na stopnjo napake, izpeljano iz potrjenih statističnih podatkov inšpekcijskih pregledov.
The Court has analysed the Commission instructions to the certification bodies for the reinforcement of assurance procedure (33). 
Sodišče je analiziralo navodila, ki jih je Komisija dala certifikacijskim organom glede postopka okrepitve zagotovila(33).
As regards substantive testing, the instructions provide for a sample of between 110 and 180 transactions and for a materiality threshold of 2 %. 
Navodila za preizkušanje podatkov določajo vzorec od 110 do 180 transakcij in prag pomemb­ nosti 2 %.
3.37. TheCommissioninstructions,however,allowa2% tolerance margin between the aid amounts validated by the paying agency and the amounts determined by the certification body and a further 2% tolerance margin for incorrect compilation of inspection statistics by the paying agency. 
3.37 Vendar navodila Komisije določajo 2-odstotno dovo­ ljeno odstopanje med zneski pomoči, ki jih je potrdila plačilna agencija, in zneski, ki jih je ugotovil certifikacijski organ, ter še 2-odstotno dovoljeno odstopanje za nepravilno zbrane stati­ stične podatke inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki jih je zbrala plačilna agencija.
The two tolerance margins allow the certification body to validate residual error rates which could be understated by up to 4 percentage points thereby undermining the materiality threshold set. _____________ (31) The certification body report explains that the control statistics for Germany (Bayern) had been readjusted six times in response to clarification requests by the Commission, the last definite version was received on 7 November 2011. 
Ti dovoljeni odstopanji certifikacijskemu organu omogočata potrditev stopenj preostale napake, ki bi bile lahko navedene do 4 odstotne točke prenizko, kar spodkopava predpisani prag pomembnosti. _____________ (31) Poročilo certifikacijskega organa pojasnjuje, da so bili kontrolni statistični podatki za Nemčijo (Bavarska) zaradi zahtev Komisije po pojasnilih šestkrat prilagojeni. Zadnja in končna različica je bila prejeta 7. novembra 2011.
(32) For the financial year 2011 only Luxembourg, Bulgaria and Romania opted to apply the reinforcement of assurance procedure. 
(32) Za leto 2011 so se za uporabo postopka okrepitve zagotovila odločili le Luksemburg, Bolgarija in Romunija.
(33) AGRI/D(2010) 248617Rev1, Part A — Audit Strategy and T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.33. 
(33) AGRI/D(2010) 248617Rev1 – Del A – Revizijska strategija in AGRI/D(2010) 251540Rev1 – Del B – Poročanje.
The Commission notes that the work to be performed by the certification body has to cover the subsequent transmissions of inspection statistics up to the time of preparation of its report. 
O D G O V O R I K O M I S I J E 3.33 Komisija opozarja, da mora delo certifikacijskega organa zajemati tudi naknadno posredovane statistične podatke inšpekcijskih pregledov do časa priprave njihovega poročila.
The instructions foresee a 2 % margin for each of the opinions: the compilation of the statistics and the information as such. 
3.37 Navodila dopuščajo 2-odstotno odstopanje pri vsaki vrsti mnenj o zbranih statističnih podatkih in o danih informacijah.
The financial effect of these two margins is not necessarily cumulative. 
Finančni učinek teh dveh odstopanj ni nujno kumulativen.