natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
70 Executive summary of the ex post evaluation of the health programme (2008-2013), 2016. 
70 Povzetek naknadne ocene zdravstvenega programa (2008–2013), 2016.
71 Conclusions of the ex post evaluation of the health programme (2008-2013), 2016. 
71 Zaključki naknadne ocene zdravstvenega programa (2008–2013), 2016.
72 This also concerned four studies procured under a 2012 framework contract for which we found that DG Health and Food Safety had no structured approach for collecting and documenting the recommendations, identifying relevant actions and monitoring implementation progress. 
72 To velja tudi za štiri študije, naročene v skladu z okvirno pogodbo iz leta 2012, za katere je Sodišče ugotovilo, da GD za zdravje in varnost hrane ni imel strukturiranega pristopa za zbiranje in dokumentiranje priporočil, opredeljevanje ustreznih ukrepov ter spremljanje napredka pri izvajanju.
These studies had also not been disseminated to the HSC at the time of the audit (October 2015). 
Poleg tega študije do časa te revizije (oktobra leta 2015) niso bile posredovane Odboru za zdravstveno varnost.
Joint actions under the health programme The EU health programme includes an innovative, promising funding instrument called ‘Joint Actions’. 
Skupni ukrepi iz zdravstvenega programa Zdravstveni program EU vključuje inovativen, obetaven instrument za financiranje, ki se imenuje skupni ukrepi.
These are generally co-financed by competent authorities responsible for health in the Member States. 
Običajno jih sofinancirajo pristojni organi, ki so v državah članicah odgovorni za zdravstvo.
Joint actions’ proposals should provide a genuine European dimension. 
Predlogi skupnih ukrepov morajo zagotavljati pravo evropsko razsežnost.
On average, joint actions have included 25 part-ners73. 
Vanje je bilo povprečno vključenih 25 par-tnerjev73.
The fact that joint actions involve or get support from national competent authorities for public health should allow for a better uptake of results and policy impact. 
Pri skupnih ukrepih sodelujejo ali jih podpirajo pristojni nacionalni organi za javno zdravje, kar bi moralo zagotoviti boljšo uporabo rezultatov in njihov vpliv na politiko.
However, given their significant size, they take more time to prepare and also require political backing and national co-funding. 
Toda ker so precej obsežni, njihova priprava traja dlje, potrebujejo pa tudi politično podporo in nacionalno sofinanciranje.
This means that, despite their potential for increasing the EU-wide take up of outputs produced with health programme funding, there cannot be too many subsequent joint actions in one policy area. 
To pomeni, da si kljub njihovemu potencialu za večjo uporabo izidov, pridobljenih s financiranjem v okviru zdravstvenega programa, na ravni EU, na enem področju politike ne more slediti preveliko število skupnih ukrepov.
73 Chafea publication on joint actions under the third health programme (2014-2020). 
73 Publikacija Chafea o skupnih ukrepih iz tretjega zdravstvenega programa (2014–2020).
Audit observations 39 85 Two actions implemented under administrative arrangements with the Joint Research Centre were discontinued after 1 year and 6 years respectively. 
Revizijska opažanja 39 85 Dva ukrepa, uvedena v skladu z upravnimi dogovori s Skupnim raziskovalnim središčem, sta se nehala izvajati po enem letu oziroma po šestih letih.
When the first action for an epidemiological modelling network was discontinued, the Commission did not make an assessment of the action results and did not document its considerations to close the action. 
Ko se je nehal izvajati prvi ukrep za mrežo epidemiološkega modeliranja, Komisija ni ocenila njegovih rezultatov in ni dokumentirala svojega stališča za zaključek ukrepa.
The second action continued for 6 years, from 2005 until 2011. 
Drugi ukrep se je izvajal šest let, od leta 2005 do leta 2011.
It concerned an information exchange platform for public health situations. 
Zadeval je platformo za izmenjavo informacij o razmerah na področju javnega zdravja.
It was developed at the request of Member States based on discussions within the HSC, but was discontinued in 2012, when the Commission decided to close all existing IT systems that were not integrated in any legal base. 
Platforma je bila razvita na zahtevo držav članic na podlagi razprav v Odboru za zdravstveno varnost, vendar je bila opuščena leta 2012, ko se je Komisija odločila odpraviti vse obstoječe računalniške sisteme, ki niso imeli pravne podlage.
86 Notwithstanding the issues presented above, there is evidently high added value in the audited projects in terms of EU-wide networking and capacity building74. 
86 Ne glede na zgornje probleme je jasno, da imajo revidirani projekti veliko dodano vrednost, kar zadeva mrežno povezovanje in krepitev zmogljivosti po vsej EU74.
All project grants are implemented by consortia of partners, and although the geographical spread in this part of the health programme is not yet optimal and there is a certain concentration of activities with a limited number of national agencies, much experience has been gained. 
Vsa nepovratna sredstva za projekte uporabljajo konzorciji partnerjev. Čeprav geografska porazdelitev v tem delu zdravstvenega programa še ni optimalna in so zaradi omejenega števila nacionalnih agencij dejavnosti dokaj zgoščene, je bilo pridobljenih veliko izkušenj.
However, the Commission does not take sufficient structured action, in collaboration with its partners, agencies and committees, to optimise the policy feedback loop. 
Toda Komisija v sodelovanju s partnerji, agencijami in svojimi odbori ne sprejema dovolj strukturiranih ukrepov, da bi optimizirala krog povratnih informacij, ki bi služile kot izhodišče za politike.
This is an issue, in particular because the health programme is a policy driven programme. 
To je težava, zlasti ker zdravstveni program temelji na politikah.
87 We found that in the third health programme (2014-2020) (also see paragraphs 89 to 94 below), there was a shift from projects to procurement75. 
87 Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je v tretjem zdravstvenem programu (2014–2020) (glej tudi odstavke 89 do 94 v nadaljevanju) prišlo do premika od projektov k javnemu naročanju75.
This is a different funding mechanism putting the ownership of the outputs with the Commission. 
To je drugačen mehanizem financiranja, ki lastništvo izidov pripisuje Komisiji.
However, as already mentioned in the Ex-post evaluation of the second health programme, there is a risk that excessive reliance on service contracts would be detrimental to health programme inclusiveness (in terms of types and geographic spread of beneficiaries). 
Kot je že omenjeno v naknadni oceni drugega zdravstvenega programa, bi lahko prekomerno zanašanje na javna naročila storitev negativno vplivalo na njegovo vključujočo naravo (kar zadeva vrste upravičencev in njihovo geografsko porazdelitev).
Our audit work for the second health programme showed (see paragraph 84) that also in the area of procurement, Chafea and the Commission could have performed better in ensuring sustainable results. 
Revizija drugega zdravstvenega programa, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, je pokazala (glej odstavek 84), da bi bili lahko Chafea in Komisija tudi na področju javnega naročanja uspešnejši pri zagotavljanju trajnostnih rezultatov.
88 Overall, the sustainability of results is not ensured for most of the audited actions under the health threats action of the second health programme, limiting their contribution towards achieving the objective of protecting citizens from threats to health. 
88 Trajnost rezultatov na splošno ni zagotovljena za večino revidiranih ukrepov iz ukrepa na področju nevarnosti za zdravje drugega zdravstvenega programa, zato je njihov prispevek k cilju varovanja državljanov pred nevarnostmi za zdravje omejen.
The Commission could take more effective action to help beneficiaries in overcoming barriers for targeted dissemination and assessing and promoting the policy relevance of completed actions. 
Komisija bi lahko sprejela uspešnejše ukrepe, da bi upravičencem pomagala premagovati ovire pri ciljno usmerjenem obveščanju ter ocenjevanju in spodbujanju pomembnosti zaključenih ukrepov za politiko.
74 As already recognised by the Court in paragraph 88 of its Special Report 2/2009 on the first health programme (2003-2007). 
74 Kot je Sodišče že ugotovilo v odstavku 88 svojega Posebnega poročila št. 2/2009 o prvem zdravstvenem programu (2003–2007).
75 There have been no calls for projects in 2014, 2015 and 2016 for the health threats objective. 
75 V letih 2014, 2015 in 2016 za cilj glede nevarnosti za zdravje ni bilo razpisov za projekte.
Audit observations 40 76 Regulation (EU) No 282/2014. 
Revizijska opažanja 40 76 Uredba (EU) št. 282/2014.
77 Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 282/2014. 
77 Priloga II k Uredbi (EU) št.
78 The full 2016 update was still ongoing at the time. 
78 Posodobitev za leto 2016 takrat še ni bila dokončana.
79 In an updated version of this mapping the figures had been increased to a total forecast amount of 14 685 000 euro for Objective 2 representing 3.63 % of the total health programme for 2014-2020. 
79 V posodobljeni različici tega pregleda so se številke zvišale na predvideni skupni znesek v višini 14 685 000 EUR za cilj 2, kar je 3,63 % skupnega zneska za zdravstveni program za obdobje 2014–2020.
80 No calls for projects were launched under this objective in 2014, 2015 or 2016. 
80 V letih 2014, 2015 ali 2016 za ta cilj ni bil objavljen noben razpis za projekte.
81 According to the forecasts, Objective 3 would take 52.5 %, and Objectives 1 and 4 approximately 20 % of the budgetary resources for the programme. 
81 Po napovedih bo za cilj 3 namenjenih 52,5 % proračunskih sredstev za program, za cilja 1 in 4 pa po približno 20 %.
Weaknesses in measuring the indicator for the health threats objective under the third EU health programme (2014-2020) and a relatively low level of spending in 2014-2016 89 The third health programme for Union action in the field of health (2014-2020)76 covers four specific objectives and indicators, one of which (i.e. Objective 2) addresses serious cross-border threats to health: ‘In order to protect Union citizens from serious cross-border health threats: identify and develop coherent approaches and promote their implementation for better preparedness and coordination in health emergencies’. 
Pomanjkljivosti pri merjenju kazalnika za cilj iz tretjega zdravstvenega programa (2014–2020), ki se nanaša na varovanje državljanov pred nevarnostmi za zdravje, ter razmeroma majhno stopnjo porabe v obdobju 2014–2016 89 Tretji program za ukrepe Unije na področju zdravja (2014–2020)76 zajema štiri posebne cilje in kazalnike. Eden od njih (tj. cilj 2) obravnava resne čezmejne nevarnosti za zdravje: „Za zaščito državljanov pred resnimi čezmejnimi nevarnostmi za zdravje: določiti in oblikovati usklajene pristope za boljšo pripravljenost in usklajevanje v izrednih zdravstvenih razmerah in si prizadevati za njihovo izvajanje.”
The objective should be measured through the increase in the number of Member States integrating coherent approaches in the design of their preparedness plans (also see paragraphs 30 to 34). 
Ta cilj je treba meriti s povečanjem števila držav članic, ki pri pripravi svojih načrtov pripravljenosti vključujejo usklajene pristope (glej tudi odstavke 30 do 34).
Thus the funded actions should contribute to achieving this specific objective, and methodologies should be in place to effectively measure the progress through the specific indicator. 
Financirani ukrepi morajo tako prispevati k doseganju tega specifičnega cilja, za uspešno merjenje napredka s posebnim kazalnikom pa morajo biti pripravljene ustrezne metodologije.
90 The financial envelope for the implementation of the 2014-2020 programme is 449 million euro. 
90 Finančna sredstva, namenjena za izvajanje programa za obdobje 2014–2020, znašajo 449 milijonov EUR.
The criteria for establishing annual work programmes77 say that there should be a balanced distribution of budgetary resources between the different objectives of the programme. 
Merila za vzpostavitev letnih delovnih programov77 določajo, da morajo biti proračunska sredstva enakomerno razporejena med različnimi cilji programa.
91 We analysed the Commission’s internal multiannual planning established in 2013, and a draft 2016 update78 which we received during the audit. 
91 Sodišče je analiziralo interno večletno načrtovanje Komisije, vzpostavljeno leta 2013, in osnutek posodobitve za leto 201678, ki ga je prejelo med revizijo.
For Objective 2 activities were initially planned for three out of the four underlying thematic priorities. 
Za cilj 2 so bile sprva načrtovane dejavnosti za tri od štirih osnovnih tematskih prioritet.
The budget overview showed that the expected overall amount for the period 2014-2020 for Objective 2, covering all different funding mechanisms, would be 12 069 000 euro, or 3 %79 of the total programme amount across all four objectives. 
Pregled proračuna je pokazal, da bi pričakovani skupni znesek za cilj 2 za obdobje 2014–2020, ki bi zajel vse mehanizme financiranja, znašal 12 069 000 EUR ali 3 %79 skupnega zneska za vse štiri cilje programa.
92 Even if the details and potential adjustments of the 2016 review of the indicative multiannual planning and the potential changes for Objective 2 were not yet available at the time of our audit, the evidence showed that fewer actions had been included in the annual work programmes for 2014 and 2015 than were initially planned80. 
92 Čeprav v času naše revizije podrobnosti in morebitne prilagoditve v okviru pregleda okvirnega večletnega načrtovanja za leto 2016 ter morebitne spremembe cilja 2 še niso bile na voljo, so dokazi pokazali, da je bilo v letna delovna programa za leti 2014 in 2015 vključenih manj ukrepov, kot je bilo sprva načrtovano80.
Consequently, the programme was not on track to spend the forecast 3 % of the total available resources on Objective 2 by 2020. 
Program je zato zaostajal pri porabi predvidenih 3 % vseh dostopnih sredstev za cilj 2 do leta 2020, kar vzbuja dvome o tem, ali razmeroma nizka raven porabe za ta cilj zadostuje za dosego tega pomembnega in ambicioznega cilja, pomeni pa tudi, da proračunska sredstva niso enakomerno razporejena med cilji81.
Audit observations 41 93 We also examined whether there was a clear methodology for measuring the specific indicator associated with Objective 2 (see paragraph 89). 
Revizijska opažanja 41 93 Sodišče je tudi proučilo, ali obstaja jasna metodologija za merjenje posebnega kazalnika, povezanega s ciljem 2 (glej odstavek 89).
Similar to our observation in paragraphs 30 to 34, we could not identify such a methodology. 
Podobno kot pri opažanju v odstavkih 30 do 34 Sodišče take metodologije ni odkrilo.
Chafea collects certain information on the implementation of the health programme, in collaboration with the national focal points of the health programme in the Member States, but not with the specific aim of quantifying the progress under this indicator on the basis of projects’ results and outcomes. 
Chafea v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi kontaktnimi točkami zdravstvenega programa v državah članicah zbira določene informacije o njegovem izvajanju, vendar ne s posebnim namenom, da bi na podlagi rezultatov in dosežkov projektov količinsko spremljala napredek glede na ta kazalnik.
Although the results of the few actions funded until now under Objective 2 of the third health programme were not assessed in this audit, we find that there is no clear methodology to measure the progress under the relevant specific indicator from the funded actions. 
Čeprav rezultatov maloštevilnih ukrepov, ki so bili do danes financirani v okviru cilja 2 tretjega zdravstvenega programa, v tej reviziji nismo ocenili, je Sodišče ugotovilo, da ni jasne metodologije za merjenje napredka glede na ustrezni posebni kazalnik za financirane ukrepe.
94 Overall, the measuring of the indicator for the third health programme’s objective to protect citizens from serious cross-border threats to health showed weaknesses and there was a relatively low level of spending for this objective in 2014-2016, in any case much lower than for the other main objectives of the programme. 
94 Na splošno je merjenje kazalnika za cilj tretjega zdravstvenega programa za varovanje državljanov pred resnimi čezmejnimi nevarnostmi za zdravje kazalo slabosti, raven porabe zanj pa je bila v obdobju 2014–2016 razmeroma nizka, v vsakem primeru veliko nižja kot za druge glavne cilje programa.
This raises concerns over whether a sufficient number of policy-relevant actions to achieve some balance between the objectives, and make a real impact for serious cross-border threats to health, can be funded by 2020. 
To vzbuja pomisleke o tem, ali je do leta 2020 mogoče financirati zadostno število ukrepov, pomembnih za politiko, da bi se doseglo ravnotežje med cilji in resnično vplivalo na resne čezmejne nevarnosti za zdravje.
There are gaps in the Commission’s internal coordination in terms of health security activities and public health crisis management 95 We examined whether the Commission’s internal coordination in terms of health security funding and public health crisis management is adequate. 
Pri notranjem usklajevanju Komisije glede dejavnosti v zvezi z zdravstveno varnostjo in javnozdravstvenega kriznega upravljanja so vrzeli 95 Sodišče je proučilo, ali je notranje usklajevanje Komisije glede financiranja zdravstvene varnosti in glede javnozdravstvenega kriznega upravljanja ustrezno.
Overall the audit revealed that a number of gaps exist in this internal coordination. 
Na splošno je revizija razkrila številne vrzeli v notranjem usklajevanju.
The coordination between Commission services for health security funding from different EU programmes does not fully ensure the achievement of synergies. 
Usklajevanje med službami Komisije za financiranje zdravstvene varnosti iz različnih programov EU ne zagotavlja v celoti vzpostavitve sinergij.
More progress is needed in operationalising the cooperation between Commission crisis management structures and we found weaknesses in the Commission’s management of its Health Emergencies Operations Facility. 
Pri operacionalizaciji sodelovanja med strukturami Komisije za krizno upravljanje je treba doseči več napredka, Sodišče pa je našlo tudi slabosti pri tem, kako Komisija upravlja svoj instrument za ukrepanje v izrednih zdravstvenih razmerah.
Audit observations 42 82 See Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 establishing the third health programme. 
Revizijska opažanja 42 82 Glej člen 12 Uredbe (EU) št. 282/2014 o vzpostavitvi tretjega zdravstvenega programa.
83 We tested to what extent the relevant policy unit in DG Health and Food Safety coordinated its involvement in or informed itself on relevant research-funded actions. 
83 Sodišče je preverilo, v kolikšni meri je ustrezni oddelek za zadevno politiko pri GD za zdravje in varnost hrane usklajeval svoje sodelovanje pri ukrepih, financiranih iz raziskav, ali zbiral informacije o njih.
During visits to DG Migration and Home Affairs, DG Research and Innovation, the Research Executive Agency and the European Research Council, we discussed coordination structures in place and tested the relevance of these projects for DG Health and Food Safety. 
Med obiski pri GD za migracije in notranje zadeve, GD za raziskave in inovacije, Izvajalski agenciji za raziskave ter Evropskem raziskovalnem svetu so se revizorji pogovarjali o sprejetih strukturah za usklajevanje ter preverili pomembnost teh projektov za GD za zdravje in varnost hrane.
Coordination between Commission services for health security funding from different EU programmes does not fully ensure synergies 96 In order to ensure that health security objectives of the health programmes are achieved in the most efficient way, the work of relevant services at the Commission and its agencies should be effectively coordinated. 
Usklajevanje med službami Komisije za financiranje zdravstvene varnosti iz različnih programov EU ne zagotavlja v celoti sinergij 96 Delo ustreznih služb Komisije in njenih agencij je treba učinkovito usklajevati, da se zagotovi kar najbolj učinkovito doseganje ciljev zdravstvenih programov na področju zdravstvene varnosti.
In implementing the EU budget, the European Commission needs to ensure sound financial management and that the use of EU resources achieves EU added value. 
Pri izvrševanju proračuna EU mora Evropska komisija zagotoviti dobro finančno poslovodenje in uporabo sredstev EU na način, ki prinaša dodano vrednost.
The Commission should also, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency and complementarity between the programme and other policies, instruments and actions of the Union, including those of the agencies82. 
Poleg tega mora Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami zagotoviti splošno skladnost in dopolnjevanje med programom in drugimi politikami, instrumenti in ukrepi Unije, vključno s tistimi, ki jih izvajajo agencije82.
97 We analysed a sample of 10 projects funded under the seventh research framework programme (FP7), representing a total level of EU co-funding of approximately 50.8 million euro. We selected projects with a potential relevance to DG Health and Food Safety’s policy area of health security based on an analysis of their objectives, originating from different strands of the FP7 programme (see paragraph 12) and managed by different Commission services or agencies. 
97 Sodišče je analiziralo vzorec desetih projektov, financiranih iz sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave (7. OP), ki jih je EU sofinancirala v višini približno 50,8 milijona EUR. Izbralo je projekte, za katere je z analizo njihovih ciljev ugotovilo, da bi lahko bili pomembni za področje politike zdravstvene varnosti GD za zdravje in varnost hrane.
We reviewed the objectives and scope of the projects, and their complementarity to the relevant health threats objectives of the health programme83. 
Sodišče je pregledalo cilje in obseg projektov ter njihovo dopolnjevanje ustreznih ciljev zdravstvenega programa na področju nevarnosti za zdravje83.
98 DG Health and Food Safety is generally involved in all formal coordination structures and procedures for FP7 and for Horizon 2020, including inter-service consultations for the work plans of Horizon 2020 and for relevant grant award decisions. 
98 GD za zdravje in varnost hrane je na splošno vključen v vse formalne usklajevalne strukture in postopke za 7. OP in program Obzorje 2020, tudi v posvetovanja med službami v zvezi z delovnimi načrti v okviru programa Obzorje 2020 in ustreznimi sklepi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev.
DG Research and Innovation participates in DG Health and Food Safety consultation procedures for the health programme and the wider policy area and is involved in the evaluation of proposals submitted under the health programme. 
GD za raziskave in inovacije sodeluje v posvetovalnih postopkih GD za zdravje in varnost hrane v zvezi z zdravstvenim programom in širšim področjem, vključen pa je tudi v ocenjevanje predlogov, predloženih v okviru zdravstvenega programa.
DG Research and Innovation is also on the ECDC management board. 
GD za raziskave in inovacije je poleg tega tudi v upravnem odboru ECDC.
Audit observations 43 99 We found that despite the scientific character of FP7 health and security projects, six projects we reviewed showed clear links with certain projects that we examined under the EU health programme. 
Revizijska opažanja 43 99 Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je imelo šest pregledanih projektov kljub znanstveni naravi projektov na področjih zdravja in varnosti v okviru 7. OP jasne povezave z določenimi projekti, ki jih je Sodišče proučilo v okviru zdravstvenega programa EU.
One potential reason is that two of the reviewed projects are so-called coordination and support actions (CSAs). 
Eden od možnih razlogov za to je, da gre pri dveh pregledanih projektih za t. i. usklajevalne in podporne ukrepe.