natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These indications stem in particular from the Commission's experience with the Research Enquiry Service since the beginning of FP7, but also from the experience with the Research Clearing Committee (RCC). 
Slednji izhajajo zlasti iz izkušenj Komisije z Raziskovalno-informacijsko službo že od samega začetka 7. OP in tudi iz izkušenj z Odborom za raziskovalna vprašanja.
The RCC contacted the national contact points (NCP) asking for their support in identifying divergent practices in the implementation of FP7 projects. 
Odbor se je obrnil na nacionalne kontaktne točke in jih prosil za podporo pri ugotavljanju različnih praks pri izvajanju projektov v okviru 7.
However, no stakeholders have made use of these channels, which may indicate that cases of diverging practices are limited in importance. 
Vendar nobena zainteresirana stran teh kanalov ni uporabila, kar je lahko pokazatelj, da so primeri različnih praks omejenega pomena.
A few inconsistencies have been raised through other means, however. 
Nekaj nedoslednosti pa je bilo kljub temu ugotovljenih z drugimi sredstvi.
This means that it only acts when other existing coordination mechanisms fail to resolve an instance of incoherent treatment. 
To pomeni, da deluje le, ko z drugimi obstoječimi mehanizmi usklajevanja ni mogoče rešiti primerov nedoslednega obravnavanja.
The fact that few cases arrive at the Research Clearing Committee shows that the other mechanisms that exist are effective in addressing and resolving most cases of incoherent treatment well before they arrive at the Research Clearing Committee. 
Dejstvo, da se Odboru predloži le malo primerov, kaže na to, da so drugi mehanizmi učinkoviti pri obravnavanju in reševanju večine primerov nedoslednega obravnavanja.
Finally, the Commission would underline that what is perceived by a beneficiary as an unjustified different treatment is in fact often due to different circumstances surrounding the particular case that lead to differences in treatment. 
Nazadnje želi Komisija poudariti, da je dejstvo, ki ga upravičenec dojema kot neupravičeno nedosledno obravnavanje, pogosto posledica različnih okoliščin posameznega primera, kar vodi do različnega obravnavanja.
The Commission has reviewed the nine examples of differing practices (Box 3).The Commission agrees with some of these cases. 
Komisija je pregledala devet primerov različnih praks (okvir 3). Z nekaterimi od teh primerov se strinja.
The Commission considers that in the other cases the differences are due to deliberate options for beneficiaries or services foreseen in the rules, or to the specific characteristics of projects. 
Komisija meni, da so v drugih primerih razlike nastale zaradi namenoma danih možnosti upravičencem ali službam, ki so predvidene v pravilih, ali glede na posebne značilnosti projektov.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Box 3 — Rules 1. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Okvir 3 – Pravila 1.
Use of flat rates to cover travel-related subsistence costs: The work programmes of one DG did not offer this option, because the simplification effect was considered to be very small. 
Uporaba pavšalnih zneskov za kritje s potovanji povezanih stroškov dnevnic Ta možnost ni bila ponujena v okviru delovnih programov enega GD, ker je učinek poenostavitve veljal za zelo majhnega.
Hearings during evaluation of large projects: According to the rules on the submission of proposals, hearings may be used whenever considered necessary by Commission services to ‘clarify further the proposals’. 
Predstavitve med ocenjevanjem velikih projektov V skladu s pravili o predložitvi predlogov se lahko predstavitve uporabijo, kadar se službam Komisije zdi potrebna „dodatna pojasnitev predlogov“.
Commission services consider it necessary to hold hearings in particular for projects that are large and complex in terms of partners, budget and content. 
Službe Komisije menijo, da je treba opraviti predstavitve zlasti za projekte, ki so veliki in zapleteni v smislu partnerjev, proračuna in vsebine.
However, the decision whether to hold or not a hearing is the prerogative of the Commission service concerned and depends on the appreciation by that service of the specificities of the proposal concerned. 
Vendar pa je odločitev, ali naj se predstavitev opravi ali ne, v pristojnosti zadevne službe Komisije in je odvisna od presoje posebnosti zadevnega predloga s strani te službe.
The requirement to conclude and provide a consortium agreement (CA): (i) The obligation to conclude a CA: According to Article 24 of the rules for participation, the CA is mandatory, save where otherwise provided in the call for proposals. 
Zahteva za sklenitev in zagotovitev konzorcijske pogodbe (i) Obveznost sklenitve konzorcijske pogodbe: v skladu s členom 24 pravil za udeležbo je sklenitev konzorcijske pogodbe obvezna, razen če ni drugače navedeno v razpisu za zbiranje predlogov.
It is acknowledged that, although formally the rules have been applied correctly, there are no written objective criteria with regard to when the CA should not be mandatory. 
Dejstvo je, da kljub uradno pravilno uporabljenim pravilom ni zapisanih objektivnih meril v zvezi s tem, kdaj sklenitev konzorcijske pogodbe ne bi smela biti obvezna.
Practice shows that CA is mandatory in most cases except for CSAs (coordination and support actions) and for FET Open where the CA is strongly recommended. (ii) The stage at which the CA must be signed and how the Commission should be informed: According to Article 1.4 of the core model EUGA, ‘the beneficiaries are deemed to have concluded a consortium agreement regarding the internal organisation of the consortium’. More precisely, by signing the GA the beneficiaries implicitly certify that they have finalised the CA before the GA's signature. 
Praksa kaže, da je sklenitev konzorcijske pogodbe v večini primerov obvezna, razen za usklajevalne in podporne ukrepe ter ukrepe v zvezi s prihodnjimi in nastajajočimi tehnologijami, pri katerih se sklenitev konzorcijske pogodbe močno priporoča. (ii) Faza, v kateri mora biti podpisana konzorcijska pogodba, in način obveščanja Komisije: V členu 1(4) osnovnega vzorca sporazuma Evropske komisije o dodelitvi je navedeno naslednje: „Za upravičence se šteje, da so sklenili konzorcijsko pogodbo o notranji organizaciji konzorcija.“ To pomeni, da s podpisom sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev upravičenci izrecno potrjujejo, da so sklenili konzorcijsko pogodbo pred podpisom sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev.
Since this is private agreement between the beneficiaries, to which the Commission does not take part, it does not review or comment on the CA; also, it does not verify if the CA has actually been signed or when this was done and it does not (except for very specific cases e.g. SME actions) request the CA or any other proof of its existence. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Ker je to zasebna pogodba med upravičenci, pri kateri Komisija ne sodeluje, slednja konzorcijske pogodbe ne pregleda in o njej ne poda pripomb, prav tako pa ne preveri, ali je bila konzorcijska pogodba dejansko podpisana ali kdaj je bila sklenjena, in ne zahteva (razen v zelo posebnih primerih, npr. dejavnostih MSP) konzorcijske pogodbe ali dokazila o njenem obstoju. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
Treatment of unforeseen subcontracting: According to Article II.7 of the EUGA, an amendment is necessary in all cases except when a subcontract concerns minor tasks. 
Obravnava nepredvidenega oddajanja del podizvajalcem V skladu s členom II.7 sporazuma Evropske komisije o dodelitvi sredstev je sprememba potrebna v vseh primerih, razen če podizvajanje zadeva manjše naloge.
According to the Guide to Financial Issues, ‘the criteria to decide whether a subcontract concerns minor tasks are qualitative and not quantitative’. 
V skladu z navodili za finančna vprašanja „so merila za odločitev, ali podizvajanje zadeva manjše naloge, kakovostna in ne količin-ska“.
The research family services apply the rules in force. 
Službe raziskovalnih skupnosti uporabljajo veljavna pravila.
However, as the qualification of the subcontracting depends on the particularities of the project, the decision of what constitutes ‘minor tasks’ will remain an appreciation depending on the specific case. There is no threshold used in the fesearch family. 
Ker pa je opredelitev oddajanja del podizvajalcem odvisna od značilnosti projekta, se bo o odločitvi o tem, kajpomenijo„manjšenaloge“,ševednopresojalogledena posamezen primer. V raziskovalni skupnosti se prag ne uporablja.
If the estimated costs of the subcontracting increase significantly with an impact on the nature of the tasks to be subcontracted, an amendment is required. 
Če se predvideni stroški oddajanja del v podizvajanje znatno povečajo, pri čemer vplivajo na značaj nalog, ki se jih odda v podizvajanje, je potrebna sprememba.
Definition of the management budget: This issue has been resolved in the last revision of the Guide to Financial Issues of January 2012 (Article II.16: Clarifications on the activities which may be charged under the category ‘other costs’, including ‘management costs’), which provided more clarification with regard to the conditions of eligibility for the different activities (research or management). 
Opredelitev proračuna za upravljanje To vprašanje je bilo rešeno v zadnji spremembi navodil za finančna vprašanja januarja 2012 (člen II.16: Pojasnila v zvezi z dejavnostmi, ki se lahko zaračunajo v okviru kategorije „drugi stroški“, vključno s „stroški upravljanja“), v katerem je več pojasnil v zvezi s pogoji za upravičenost za različne dejavnosti (raziskave ali upravljanje).
This issue has therefore been proactively identified and resolved to the full extent by the Commission services. 
Službe Komisije so to vprašanje proaktivno opredelile in v celoti rešile.
Procedure followed if the beneficiary changes its legal name: According to the ‘Amendments Guide for FP7 Grant Agreements’, a simple change of legal name does not require an amendment and is done via an information letter. 
Postopek, ki se uporablja v primeru, ko upravičenec spremeni svoje pravno ime V skladu z „Vodnikom po spremembah za sporazume o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev 7. OP“ preprosta sprememba pravnega imena ne zahteva spremembe in poteka prek informacijskega pisma.
However, ‘in certain cases, what may appear to be a “change of name”, may in fact refer to different situations, some of which will require an amendment (e.g. change of legal entity)’. 
Vendar se „v nekaterih primerih, za katere se zdi, da gre za „spremembo imena“, v resnici ta lahko nanaša na različne primere, od katerih bodo nekateri zahtevali spremembo (npr. spremembo pravne osebe)“.
In these cases, the Commission requires that an amendment to the grant agreement is concluded. 
Komisija v takih primerih zahteva, da se sprejme sprememba sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev.
Frequency of reporting: It is accepted that there are different practices among services regarding the standard duration of the reporting periods. 
Pogostnost poročanja Dejstvo je, da med službami obstajajo različne prakse v zvezi z običajnim trajanjem obdobij poročanja.
The differences may be justified by a different risk assessment of, or by the length or size of, research projects. 
Razlike je mogoče utemeljiti z drugačno oceno tveganja ali z dolžino ali obsegom raziskovalnih projektov.
A common default solution as regards reporting periods is presently being considered. 
Trenutno se proučuje možnost skupne rešitve glede obdobij poročanja.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 8. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE 8.
Use of scientific review for project monitoring: The divergences referred to by the Court are accepted. 
Uporaba znanstvenih pregledov za spremljanje projekta Razlike, ki jih navaja Sodišče, so sprejete.
The Commission will ensure the harmonisation of this issue taking into account the specificities of different projects and programmes. 
Komisija bo zagotovila uskladitev tega vprašanja ob upoštevanju posebnosti različnih projektov in programov.
Possibility to execute multiple payments per period: The introduction of the ‘single submission button’, which will be operational as of the second quarter of 2013, will lead to the disappearance of the differences identified by the ECA; however, partial payments carried out in exceptional circumstances will remain possible and their use by one or the other service should not be regarded as a different application of the rules. 
Možnost izvrševanja več plačil na obdobje Uvedba „enega gumba za oddajo“, ki bo začel delovati v drugem četrtletju leta 2013, bo vodila k odpravi razlik, ki jih je ugotovilo Evropsko računsko sodišče, vendar bodo delna plačila, ki se izvajajo v izjemnih okoliščinah, še naprej možna, njihova uporaba s strani ene ali druge službe pa se ne sme obravnavati kot drugačna uporaba pravil.
The Commission's proposal on the Horizon 2020 rules for participation foresees the application of a single set of rules for all components of Horizon 2020 including the JTIs as a general principle. 
V predlogu Komisije o pravilih za udeležbo v programu Obzorje 2020 je predvidena uporaba enotnega sklopa pravil za vse sestavne dele programa, vključno s skupnimi tehnološkimi pobudami kot osnovnim načelom.
Article 1 foresees that derogations are only possible if this is provided for in the basic act or, subject to the consent of the Commission, if its specific operating needs so require. 
V členu 1 je predvideno, da so odstopanja mogoča le, če je to v skladu s temeljnim aktom ali če v to privoli Komisija, kadar to zahtevajo njene posebne operativne potrebe.
For the future framework programme the rules for Horizon 2020 now apply fully to the competitiveness and innovation framework programme. 
V zvezi s prihodnjim okvirnim programom se pravila za Obzorje 2020 po novem že v celoti uporabljajo za okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije.
Furthermore, the Commission has opened a path towards harmonisation between the rules applying to the European Structural and Investment Funds and those applicable in Union policies for a similar type of operation and beneficiary in its proposal for a common provision regulation for the Structural Funds, which is currently under discussion with the European Parliament and the Council. 
Poleg tega je Komisija v svojem predlogu uredbe o skupnih določbah Strukturnih skladov, o katerem trenutno potekajo razprave z Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom, omogočila usklajevanje med pravili, ki se uporabljajo za evropske strukturne in investicijske sklade, in tistimi, ki se uporabljajo v politikah Unije za podobno vrsto operacij in upravičencev.
In its proposals for Horizon 2020 and for the Structural Funds, the Commission therefore aims for synergies between different EU funding sources. 
Komisija si v svojih predlogih za program Obzorje 2020 in Strukturne sklade zato prizadeva za sinergije med različnimi viri financiranja EU.
In addition, the proposed funding rules for research and innovation and the Structural Funds are aligned much more closely to the rules of the Financial Regulation, which will resolve a number of the differences. 
Poleg tega so predlagana pravila za financiranje raziskav in inovacij ter Strukturnih skladov bolje usklajena s pravili finančne uredbe, kar bo odpravilo številne razlike.
For example, there will no longer be a difference in treatment of VAT. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Tako na primer DDV ne bo več različno obravnavan. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
One of the key elements of the Commission's proposal on the cohesion policy for the period 2014–20 is the introduction of a common strategic framework (CSF) applying to the European Structural and Investment Funds (ERDF, ESF, CF, EARDF, EMFF), which shall precisely ‘provide clear strategic direction to the programming process and facilitate sectoral and territorial coordination of Union intervention under the CSF funds and with the objectives and targets of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (Article 10 of the CPR). 
Eden od ključnih elementov predloga Komisije o kohezijski politiki za obdobje 2014–2020 je uvedba skupnega strateškega okvira (SSO), ki se uporablja za evropske strukturne in investicijske sklade (ESRR, ESS, KS, EKSRP, ESPR), pri čemer okvir natančno „zagotavlja jasno strateško usmeritev postopka programiranja in olajšuje sektorsko in ozemeljsko usklajevanje ukrepov Unije v okviru skladov SSO ter z drugimi zadevnimi politikami Unije in instrumenti EU v skladu s splošnimi in posameznimi cilji strategije Unije za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ (člen 10 uredbe o skupnih določbah).
Annex I to the CPR, which is binding for both Member States and the Commission, also provides one specific section requiring coordination between the CSFfunds and other Union policies and instruments, and especially with Horizon 2020 and other centrally managed EU programmes in the areas of research and innovation (4.3). 
Priloga I k uredbi o skupnih določbah, ki je zavezujoča za države članice in Komisijo, vsebuje tudi poseben oddelek, ki zahteva usklajevanje med skladi SSO ter drugimi politikami in instrumenti Unije, zlasti s programom Obzorje 2020 ter drugimi centralno vodenimi programi EU na področju raziskav in inovacij (člen 4(3)).
The CSF shall therefore contribute to the search for synergies between EU funding sources supporting research and innovation. 
SSO bo torej prispeval k iskanju sinergij med finančnimi viri EU za podporo raziskav in inovacij.
On this basis, the Commission has just established an inter-service working group on ‘Synergies between EU funding sources supporting research and innovation’. 
Na podlagi tega je Komisija nedavno ustanovila medresorsko delovno skupino glede „sinergij med finančnimi viri EU za podporo raziskavam in inovacijam“.
Moreover, a memorandum of understanding is being signed by the directors general of DG REGIO, DG RTD and the JRC. 
Poleg tega bodo generalni direktorji GD za regionalno in mestno politiko, GD za raziskave in inovacije ter Skupnega raziskovalnega središča podpisali memorandum o soglasju.
For the Horizon 2020 programme, efforts are under way to further streamline cost reimbursement rules. 
Glede programa Obzorje 2020 so v teku prizadevanja za nadaljnjo poenostavitev pravil za povračilo stroškov.
The Commission intends to develop guidance for EU/national/regional decision-makers and managing authorities to ensure that the opportunities for synergies offered through the new regulations will be translated into the design of operational programmes and Horizon 2020 work programmes. 
Komisija namerava razviti smernice za nosilce odločanja na ravni EU, na nacionalni in regionalni ravni ter za organe upravljanja, da bi zagotovila, da bodo priložnosti za sinergije, ki jih omogočajo nove uredbe, prenesene v načrt operativnih programov in delovnih programov Obzorja 2020.
One of the key priorities identified in the ERA communication is optimal transnational cooperation and competition. 
Ena od ključnih prednostnih nalog, ki je opredeljena v sporočilu o Evropskem raziskovalnem prostoru, je optimalno nadnacionalno sodelovanje in konkurenca.
To jointly address grand challenges, synergies between European and national programmes have to be exploited and the different sources of national and other funds at EU level must be strategically aligned. 
Da bi se skupno obravnavali veliki izzivi, je treba izkoristiti sinergije med evropskimi in nacionalnimi programi, različne vire državnih in drugih sredstev na ravni EU pa je treba strateško uskladiti.
The Commission accepts that this is not an easy task, but it is an essential element in an effective European Research Area. 
Komisija priznava, da to ni lahka naloga, vendar je bistven element učinkovitega Evropskega raziskovalnega prostora.
The lengthening of the reporting periods was first and foremost a simplification measure, designed to lower the administrative burden on beneficiaries. 
Podaljšanje obdobij poročanja je bil predvsem ukrep poenostavitve, namenjen zmanjšanju upravnega bremena za upravičence.
Common reply to paragraphs 48–52 The IT tools for the management of the framework programmes have substantially evolved and improved since the 2004 Court audit on FP5. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavke 48–52 Orodja IT za upravljanje okvirnih programov so se znatno razvila in izboljšala od revizije 5.
FP7 electronic tools generally compare favourably with those of most national funding agencies visited (see paragraph 52). 
OP se na splošno lahko uspešno primerjajo z orodji večine obiskanih nacionalnih agencij za financiranje (glej odstavek 52).
Further improvements are nevertheless planned under Horizon 2020. 
Ne glede na to so načrtovane nadaljnje izboljšave v okviru programa Obzorje 2020.
In addressing the heterogeneity of IT tools used by the Commission in the research field, the Commission started first the harmonisation in the area having the strongest impact on the quality of service to beneficiaries and, at the same time, having been least automated. 
Komisija je pri obravnavanju raznovrstnosti orodij IT, ki jih uporablja na področju raziskav, najprej začela z njihovim usklajevanjem na področju, ki ima največji vpliv na kakovost storitev za upravičence in na katerem so ta orodja hkrati najmanj avtomatizirana.
As regards the back-office tools, it should be stressed that significant progress has been made in FP7 with respect to previous FPs. 
Glede podpornih orodij („back-office“) je treba poudariti, da je bil v okviru 7. OP v primerjavi s prejšnjimi okvirnimi programi dosežen znaten napredek.
However, the full integration of modules has not yet taken place. 
Vendar pa do popolne povezave modulov še ni prišlo.
This situation is foreseen to end in Horizon 2020. 
To stanje bo predvidoma odpravljeno v okviru programa Obzorje 2020.
The Commission is currently developing a common back-office IT tool (SYGMA) and a common electronic workflow tool (Compass). 
Komisija trenutno razvija skupno podporno orodje IT (SYGMA) in skupno elektronsko orodje za potek dela (COMPASS).
This scenario will signal the end of the fragmentation described by the Court and therefore an integrated IT system will be in place. 
To bo pomenilo konec razdrobljenosti, kot stanje opisuje Sodišče, saj bo vzpostavljen integriran sistem IT.
The Commission believes that resources are used in an economical manner. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 
Komisija meni, da se sredstva uporabljajo gospodarno. Posebno poročilo št. 2/2013 – Ali je Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
70 In this respect, the Commission has established a governance structure and working procedures to manage and adapt the IT tools available to management needs and expectations while taking full account of cost-effectiveness issues. 
70 V zvezi s tem je Komisija vzpostavila strukturo upravljanja in delovne postopke za upravljanje ter prilagoditev razpoložljivih orodij IT potrebam in pričakovanjem vodstva, pri čemer je v celoti upoštevala vprašanja stroškovne učinkovitosti.
The development of these tools has been continuously controlled and monitored. 
Razvoj teh orodij se redno nadzoruje in spremlja.
At each step of this process, decisions were taken bearing in mind all the possible options at stake in accordance with the available technology and resources, the need to provide a continuous and effective service to beneficiaries and the need to profit from developments already undertaken. 
Za vsak procesni korak so bile ob upoštevanju vseh morebitnih možnosti sprejete odločitve v skladu z razpoložljivo tehnologijo in viri, potrebo po zagotovitvi trajne in učinkovite storitve za upravičence ter potrebo po pridobivanju koristi na podlagi preteklega razvoja.