natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The fact that there is an accelerated decrease in animal numbers maintained after the introduction of SPS is a cause of environmental concern, especially in the more disadvantaged ‘hills and islands’ areas or the fragile north-west region of Scotland. 
Pospeše-no upadanje števila živali v reji po uvedbi SEP povzroča zaskrbljenost v zvezi z okoljem, zlasti na bolj prikrajšanih goratih in otoških območjih občutljive severozahodne regije Škotske.
According to the information provided by the Scottish authorities, ‘since the introduction of single farm payments, the decline in sheep numbers has accelerated, with a decrease of 14,4 % in the last 5 years. 
Po podatkih, ki so jih posredovali škotski organi, je od uvedbe enotnih plačil na kmetijo upadanje števila ovac pospeše-no, pri čemer se je v zadnjih petih letih njihovo število zmanjšalo za 14,4 %.
Cattle numbers also declined by 7,5 % between 2005 and 2009, although there has been a small increase of 0,8 % in the last year.’ 
Število glav goveda se je med letoma 2005 in 2009 prav tako zmanjšalo za 7,5 %, čeprav se je v zadnjem letu rahlo povečalo, in sicer za 0,8 %.
Another example of the risk of abandonment of production in difficult areas is Portugal, which has a high proportion of its agricultural land in disadvantaged areas. 
Še en primer tveganja opustitve proizvodnje na težavnih območjih je Portugalska, kjer se velik delež kmetijskih zemljišč nahaja na prikrajšanih območjih.
The majority of sheep farming in Portugal occurs in areas with natural problems or in marginal areas with no economically viable alternatives. 
Večina ovčereje na Portugalskem se izvaja na območjih z naravnimi ovirami ali na obrobnih območjih, kjer ni drugih gospodarsko upravičenih možnosti.
In 2009, a large proportion (53 %) of total ewe premiums was paid to beneficiaries in the Alentejo region which is classified as LFA. 
Leta 2009 je bila večina premij za ovce (53 %) izplačana upravičencem v regiji Alentejo, ki se uvršča med območja z omejenimi možnostmi.
After 50 % decoupling of the ewe and goat premiums, an analysis of the trends shows there was a sharper decline in sheep and goat beneficiaries in this region than in others, which shows that the risk of abandonment of production due to decoupling is more pronounced in disadvantaged areas where alternatives are limited. 
Pri analizi trendov se je pokazalo, da je po uvedbi 50-odstotne nevezanosti premij za ovce in koze v tej regiji prišlo do večjega zmanjšanja števila upravičencev do pomoči za ovce in koze kot v drugih regijah, kar kaže na to, da je tveganje opustitve proizvodnje zaradi uvedbe nevezane pomoči bolj izrazito na območjih z omejenimi nadomestnimi možnostmi.
40 According to the Quality Meat Scotland report ‘The importance of livestock production to the Scottish economy’, based on the Macaulay Land Use Research Institute’s land capability classification for agricultural use, only 6 % of Scotland’s land area is classified as ‘above average quality land’ and therefore suitable for arable crops. 
40 Po podatkih iz poročila škotskega organa Quality Meat Scotland: The importance of livestock production to the Scottish economy (Pomen živinoreje za škotsko gospodarstvo), ki temelji na klasifikaciji zemljišč za rabo v kmetijstvu inštituta Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, je le 6 % zemljišč na Škotskem uvrščenih med nadpovprečno kakovostna zemljišča, ki so primerna za poljedelstvo.
Subsequently, there is a high dependency on ruminant livestock farming reflecting the land capability of Scotland and the limited alternatives for production on this land. 
Zato je Škotska močno odvisna od reje prežvekovalcev, kar odraža slabšo kakovost zemlje in omejene možnosti za proizvodnjo na njej.
According to the European Commission’s classification system for determining less favoured areas, nearly 85 % of Scotland’s agricultural land is categorised as LFA and ruminant livestock production is the dominant farming activity with more than 90 % of breeding ewes and 82 % of beef cows found in these areas. Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
V skladu s sistemom klasifikacije, ki ga Evropska komisija uporablja za določanje območij z omejenimi možnostmi, je med tovrstna območja uvrščenih skoraj 85 % škotskih kmetijskih zemljišč, reja prežvekovalcev pa je tu vodilna kmetijska dejavnost, saj se na teh območjih nahaja več kot 90 % ovac za razplod in 82 % krav. Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP
THE COMMISSION AND MEMBER STATES’ MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS 42. 
29 SISTEMI KOMISIJE IN DRŽAV ČLANIC ZA SPREMLJANJE IN OCENJEVANJE 42.
The Commission and the Member States should have in place appropriate management tools such as well-functioning performance management frameworks to regularly monitor predetermined performance indicators, and for assessing social, economic and environmental impacts of the schemes41. 
Komisija in države članice bi morale imeti ustrezna orodja za upravljanje, na primer dobro delujoče okvire za upravljanje delovanja, s pomočjo katerih bi redno spremljale vnaprej določene kazalnike uspešnosti in ocenjevale socialne, gospodarske in okoljske učinke shem41.
In addition, the two schemes should be properly coordinated with other support available to the sectors. 
Poleg tega bi bilo treba ti shemi ustrezno uskladiti z ostalimi oblikami podpore, ki so na voljo za ta sektorja.
In general, each of the Member States audited has at its disposal detailed information concerning the livestock sectors and the agricultural situation of different agricultural regions within their territory. 
Na splošno ima vsaka revidirana država članica na voljo natančne informacije o živinorejskih sektorjih in položaju kmetijstva v različnih kmetijskih regijah na svojem ozemlju.
However, this information is scattered across departments at various levels or in various agencies which collect such information each for their own purposes. 
Vendar pa so te informacije razpršene po različnih oddelkih na različnih ravneh ali pri različnih agencijah, ki tovrstne podatke zbirajo vsaka za svoje namene.
Since there is no legal requirement concerning monitoring arrangements, most of the Member States visited did not implement a monitoring system linking the outputs of the audited animal aid schemes with specific final outcomes nor had they defined specific performance indicators for the audited schemes. 
Ker ni zakonskih zahtev glede ureditve spremljanja, večina obiskanih držav članic nima sistema spremljanja, ki bi rezultate revidiranih shem pomoči za živali povezoval s posameznimi končnimi izidi, niti opredeljenih posebnih kazalnikov uspešnosti za revidirani shemi.
Despite the reasons given for maintaining the partial implementation of SPS measures through the audited aid schemes42, the Commission did not clarify what is meant by ‘production’ (e.g. number of farms, beneficiaries, maintained animals, etc.) or ‘supply to processing industries’ (e.g. calves or lambs, live carcass weight, tonnes of meat, etc.) and how these two components would address the envisaged socioeconomic and environmental impacts. 
Komisija je navedla razloge za ohranitev delnega izvajanja ukrepov SEP prek revidiranih shem pomoči42, ni pa pojasnila, kaj je mišljeno z izrazom proizvodnja (npr. število kmetij, upravičencev, živali v reji itn.) ali preskrba predelovalne industrije (npr. teleta ali jagnjeta, živa teža, tone mesa itn.) ter kako bi ti sestavini vplivali na predvidene socialno-ekonomske in okoljske učinke.
41 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the financial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 
1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
1), the financial regulation, Article 27 states that: ‘Budget appropriations shall be used in accordance with the principle of sound financial management, namely in accordance with the principle of economy, efficiency and effectiveness’. Further, it states that ‘Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed objectives shall be set for all sectors of activity covered by the budget. 
1), t. i. finančni uredbi, je v členu 27 navedeno: „Odobrena proračunska sredstva morajo biti uporabljena v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, in sicer z načeli gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti.“ V nadaljevanju je navedeno: „Za vse sektorje dejavnosti, ki jih zajema proračun, se določijo specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, ustrezni in časovno opredeljeni cilji.
Achievement of those objectives shall be monitored by performance indicators [...]’. 
Doseganje teh ciljev se za vsako dejavnost spremlja s kazalci poslovanja [...]“.
42 See paragraph 7, Box 1: ‘a minimum level of agricultural production [...] to ensure an adequate supply of raw materials to processing industries [...]’. 
42 Glej odstavek 7, okvir 1:„minimalna raven kmetijske proizvodnje [...] za zagotovitev ustrezne preskrbe predelovalne industrije s surovinami [...]“.
As a consequence, these terms are not defined in a coherent manner across the Member States implementing the audited schemes and are not linked to the needs stated by the budgetary authorities and the Commission in support of maintaining the schemes. 
Pojmi zato niso enotno opredeljeni v vseh državah članicah, ki izvajajo revidirani shemi, in niso povezani s potrebami, ki jih proračunski organi in Komisija navajajo v podporo ohranitvi shem.
Instead, the Member States had widely different interpretations on the possible objectives of the schemes and on the different approximate substitutes (i.e. operational objectives) that could be used to monitor their effectiveness (see Box 7). 
Nasprotno, države članice so zelo različno razumele mogoče cilje shem in njihove različne približne nadomestke (tj. operativne cilje), s pomočjo katerih bi se lahko spremljala njihova uspešnost (glej okvir 7).
However, such interpretations do not necessarily constitute appropriate43 performance indicators for the achievement of the set issues that the two schemes were supposed to address and that the Commission could monitor at EU level. 
Takšno razumevanje pa ne predstavlja nujno ustreznih kazalnikov uspešnosti43 za reševanje problematike, ki naj bi jo ti shemi obravnavali in ki bi jo Komisija lahko spremljala na ravni EU.
An additional constraint in the monitoring by the Commission is that there is no monitoring tool that would provide a global/holistic view of the aids that are available to the animal sectors from various sources and which work in synergy with each other. 
Dodatna omejitev pri spremljanju, ki ga izvaja Komisija, je dejstvo, da ni orodja za spremljanje, ki bi zagotavljajo globalen/celosten pregled nad vrstami pomoči, ki so živinorejskim sektorjem na voljo iz različnih virov in ki delujejo v sinergiji.
Such aids are available under both Pillar I and Pillar II of the CAP44 as well as from national funds. 
Take pomoči so na voljo v okviru stebra I in stebra II SKP44 ter v okviru nacionalnih sredstev.
Although this information exists at various levels within the Commission, it is not systematically collected and monitored in a comprehensive manner. 
Čeprav ti podatki obstajajo na različnih ravneh znotraj Komisije, se ne zbirajo in spremljajo sistematično in celostno.
43 Performance indicators must be relevant, accepted, credible, easy and robust (RACER). 
43 Kazalniki uspešnosti morajo biti ustrezni, sprejeti, verodostojni, preprosti in stabilni (RACER).
44 Pillar I comprises market support measures and direct aids, including SPS, to EU producers. 
44 Steber I zajema ukrepe za podporo trga in neposredno pomoč za proizvajalce EU, vključno s SEP.
Pillar II covers rural development measures, aimed at supporting rural communities to develop and diversify. 
Steber II zajema ukrepe za razvoj podeželja, katerih namen je podpirati razvoj in diverzifikacijo podeželskih skupnosti.
30 BOX 7 DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS IN THE MEMBER STATES FOR PERFORMANCE INDICATORS France: According to stakeholders, ‘production’ could be monitored by the number of calves or tonnes of veal exported instead of only suckler cow animals maintained. 
30 OKVIR 7 RAZLIČNO RAZUMEVANJE KAZALNIKOV USPEŠNOSTI PO DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH Francija: Po mnenju zainteresiranih strani bi bilo proizvodnjo mogoče spremljati s pomočjo števila telet ali ton izvožene teletine in ne le s številom krav dojilj v reji.
‘Supply to the processing industry’ could be the kilograms of live carcass weight of beef, veal and lambs. 
Oskrba predelovalne industrije bi lahko pomenila kilograme žive teže goveda, telet in jagnjet.
For the goat sector the interpretation by the stakeholders as a measure of supply to the processing industry was the goat milk produced and delivered to the cheese industries. 
Zainteresirane strani v sektorju kozjega mesa kot merilo za preskrbo predelovalne industrije razumejo količino kozjega mleka, ki se proizvede in dobavi sirarski industriji.
Belgium: ‘Production’ was taken to mean the numbers of the ‘Blanc-Bleu Belge’ breed of cows. 
Belgija: Proizvodnjo razumejo kot število krav pasme Blanc-Bleu Belge.
Beef production was defined by the term ‘production indigene brute (PIB)’ (indigenous gross production) which is counted in terms of tonnes weight of equivalent carcass. 
Proizvodnjo govedine so opredelili s pojmom production indigene brute (PIB) (bruto domača proizvodnja), ki se meri v tonah ekvivalenta mase klavnega trupa.
This is calculated considering the number of slaughtered animals in Belgium plus exported live animals minus live imported animals. 
Ta se izračuna kot vsota števila živali, zaklanih v Belgiji, ter števila izvoženih živih živali, od česar se odšteje število živih uvoženih živali.
Spain: The national authorities defined ‘production’ as a combination of the total number of animals, the number of farms and the quantity of meat produced. 
Španija: Nacionalni organi so proizvodnjo opredelili kot kombinacijo skupnega števila živali, števila kmetij in količine proizvedenega mesa.
For example, the livestock sectors benefit significantly from Pillar II rural development funds, notably agri-environment measures45, and the interviewed stakeholders (national authorities and farmers’ representative associations) agreed on the complementarity of this aid. 
Živinorejski sektorji so na primer deležni znatne pomoči iz sredstev za razvoj podeželja iz stebra II, zlasti v okviru kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov45, in zainteresirane strani (nacionalni organi in predstavniška združenja kmetov), s katerimi so bili opravljeni pogovori, so se strinjale, da se te pomoči medsebojno dopolnjujejo.
In addition, suckler cow and sheep and goat farmers’ production decisions are significantly affected by other Pillar I policy instruments (e.g. cross-compliance conditions46, Article 68 measures, etc.) or nationally funded measures (see Box 8 for examples). 
Poleg tega na odločitve rejcev krav dojilj, ovac in koz v zvezi s proizvodnjo močno vplivajo tudi drugi instrumenti politik iz stebra I (npr. pogoji navzkrižne skladnosti iz SEP46, ukrepi iz člena 68 itn.) ali ukrepi, ki se financirajo iz nacionalnih proračunov (glej primere v okviru 8).
Beneficiaries visited do not distinguish between the various components of aid which they receive. 
Obiskani upravičenci ne razlikujejo med posameznimi sestavnimi deli pomoči, ki jo prejemajo.
Instead, it is the total amount of aid that mattered to beneficiaries in making their production decisions, and not one single scheme by itself (see Box 9). 
Pri sprejemanju njihovih odločitev glede proizvodnje je pomemben skupni znesek pomoči in ne vsaka posamezna shema (glej okvir 9).
There is thus potential for double funding47 through the existence of various schemes with similar objectives, which could be avoided if the Commission had a global view of the different schemes available to farmers and their impacts. 
Zaradi različnih shem s podobnimi cilji obstaja torej možnost dvojnega financiranja47, ki bi se mu lahko izognili, če bi imela Komisija globalen pregled nad različnimi shemami, ki so na voljo kmetom, in njihovimi učinki.
45 See also, European Commission (2010) Evaluation of CAP measures concerning sectors subject to past or present direct support — Lot 1: Horizontal issues: ‘Evaluation of market effects of partial decoupling’, p. 
45 Glej tudi: Evropska komisija (2010), Ocena ukrepov SKP v zvezi s sektorji, ki jim je bila ali jim je namenjena neposredna pomoč – Sklop 1: Horizontalna vprašanja: „Ocena učinkov delno nevezanih pomoči na trge“, str.
46 These cross compliance conditions include keeping land in good agricultural and environmental condition and respect of statutory management regulations. 
46 Pogoji navzkrižne skladnosti vključujejo tudi ohranjanje zemljišča v dobrem kmetijskem in okoljskem stanju ter spoštovanje predpisanih pravil ravnanja.
47 The term ‘double funding’ as used by the Commission refers to payments being made under two or more schemes in order to achieve the same objective. 
47 Izraz dvojno financiranje, kot ga uporablja Komisija, se nanaša na plačila, ki se za dosego istega cilja izplačujejo v okviru dveh ali več shem.
31 BOX 8 EXAMPLES OF SUPPORT SCHEMES FOR THE AUDITED SECTORS WITH SIMILAR OBJECTIVES Ireland: Animal welfare recording and breeding scheme for suckler herds (coupled aid also known as suckler cow welfare scheme). A nationally funded scheme with the agreement of the Commission48 currently paying a premium of 40 euro per head (about 92,5 million euro) to improve animal welfare and the quality of the dedicated beef suckler herd. 
31 OKVIR 8 PRIMERI PODPORNIH SHEM ZA REVIDIRANE SEKTORJE S PODOBNIMI CILJI Irska: Shema za beleženje dobrega počutja živali in vzrejo čred krav dojilj (vezana pomoč, znana tudi kot shema za dobro počutje krav dojilj), financirana na nacionalni ravni s soglasjem Komisije48, iz katere se trenutno izplačuje premija 40 EUR na glavo (približno 92,5 milijonov EUR) za izboljšanje dobrega počutja živali in kakovosti dotične črede krav dojilj.
Grassland sheep scheme (decoupled aid using Article 68 provisions). Financed by unused SPS appropriations, it is an area-based scheme linked to stocking density of sheep, with different rates for lowland and upland farmers, equivalent to 10 euros per ewe (about 54 million euro over its three-year duration). 
Shema za pašne ovce (nevezana pomoč na podlagi določb člena 68) je vezana na površino, financira se iz neporabljenih sredstev iz SEP in je povezana z gostoto ovac ter ima različne stopnje za nižinske in višinske kmete, ki znašajo 10 EUR na ovco (okrog 54 milijonov EUR v treh letih njenega trajanja).
United Kingdom (Scotland): Scottish beef calf scheme (SBCS) (coupled aid financed via Article 69 and then Article 68 provisions). It provides direct support to specialist beef producers of male and female calves which are at least 75 % beef bred and at least 30 days old (119 200 000 euro from 2010–13 or about 18–19 million pound sterling in annual payments). 
Združeno kraljestvo (Škotska): Škotska shema za teleta (SBCS) (vezana pomoč, ki se financira na podlagi določb člena 69 in člena 68) zagotavlja neposredno podporo za specializirane govedorejce, ki redijo teleta in telice, namenjene najmanj 75-odstotno za prirejo mesa in stare najmanj 30 dni (119 200 000 EUR med letoma 2010 in 2013 ali okrog 18–19 milijonov GBP v letnih plačilih).
48 I.e. in accordance with Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty and the European Commission’s Agricultural State Aid Guidelines. 
48 V skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES in smernicami Komisije za državno pomoč v kmetijskem sektorju.
32 BOX 9 23 576 euro 12 % 35 % 33 % 20 % 25 281 euro 5% 15 % 10 % 13 % 19 % 38 % 15 129 euro 9% 27 % 1% 63 % 18 949 euro 7% 21 % 22 % 50 % 25 992 euro 5% 15 % 1% 42 % 37 % 12 574 euro 6% 19 % 75 % EXAMPLE OF A COMBINATION OF DIFFERENT AID SCHEMES ACCOMPLISHING SIMILAR OBJECTIVES The beneficiary was located in a disadvantaged area in one of the audited Member States and was visited on the spot. 
32 OKVIR 9 23 576 EUR 12 % 35 % 33 % 20 % 25 281 EUR 5% 15 % 10 % 13 % 19 % 38 % 15 129 EUR 9% 27 % 1% 63 % 18 949 EUR 7% 21 % 22 % 50 % 25 992 EUR 5% 15 % 1% 42 % 37 % 12 574 EUR 6% 19 % 75 % PRIMER KOMBINACIJE RAZLIČNIH SHEM POMOČI, KI IZPOLNJUJEJO PODOBNE CILJE Upravičenec na območju z omejenimi možnostmi ene izmed revidiranih držav članic je bil obiskan na kraju samem.
The farmer’s major economic activity consisted of production of lamb animals that he sold for fattening to other farmers or directly for slaughter. 
Njegova glavna gospodarska dejavnost je obsegala rejo jagnjet, ki jih je prodajal drugim kmetom za pitanje ali pa neposredno za zakol.
Lamb production arose out of maintenance of 400 ewes grazing in a fenced-in area within the circa 250 ha of the farmer’s land. 
Reja jagnjet je izhajala iz reje 400 ovac, ki se pasejo na ograjeni površini na približno 250 hektarih kmetovega zemljišča.
Protein crops and cereals produced from the farm were, according to the farmer, used mostly as feed for his animals. 
Po navedbah kmeta se stročnice in žito, ki se pridelajo na kmetiji, uporabljajo pretežno kot krma za njegove živali.
In 2009, the farmer passed on half of the business to his son (transferring 200 sheep). 
Leta 2009 je kmet polovico svoje proizvodnje (200 ovac) predal sinu.
An analysis of the relative contribution of the different schemes shows the small financial importance of the sheep premiums on the farmer’s production decision. 
Analiza relativnega prispevka različnih shem je pokazala, da je imel finančni pomen premij za ovce majhen vpliv na odločitev kmeta glede proizvodnje.
Meanwhile, LFA and agri-environment measures have similar objectives to the audited schemes in terms of regional targeting and environmental outcomes and contribute much more to the farmer’s total subsidy income. 
Ukrepi za območja z omejenimi možnostmi in kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi imajo podobne cilje kot revidirani shemi, kar zadeva regionalno usmerjenost in okoljske rezultate, vendar bistveno več prispevajo k skupni višini subvencij, ki jih prejema kmet.
Additionally, cross-compliance requirements for SPS premiums in this farm would have been met most efficiently by grazing livestock such as sheep and therefore, the farmer would have maintained grazing animals even in the absence of the specific production requirement imposed by the ewe scheme. 
Poleg tega bi bile zahteve navzkrižne skladnosti za premije SEP na tej kmetiji najučinkoviteje izpolnjene s pašo živali, kot so ovce, zato bi kmet pašo živali ohranil tudi brez zahtev po posebni proizvodnji, ki jih postavlja shema za ovce.
2004 2005 Decoupled premium (SPS) Exceptional blue tongue financial aid 2006 2007 2008 2009 Evolution of the farmer X`s annual agricultural subsidies Agri-environment scheme (Pillar II) Basic sheep and goat premium Less favourable areas measures (Pillar II) Supplementary sheep and goat premium Special Report No 11/2012 – Suckler cow and ewe and goat direct aids under partial implementation of SPS arrangements 
2004 2005 nevezane premije (SEP) izjemna finančna pomoč za bolezen modrikastega jezika 2006 2007 2008 2009 Gibanje letnih subvencij za kmetijstvo kmeta X kmetijsko-okoljska shema (steber II) osnovne premije za ovce in koze ukrepi za območja z omejenimi možnostmi (steber II) dodatne premije za ovce in koze Posebno poročilo št. 11/2012 – Neposredna pomoč za krave dojilje ter ovce in koze v okviru delnega izvajanja določb SEP
33 ASSESSMENT OF THE SCHEMES’ IMPACTS BY THE COMMISSION IS HINDERED BY SOME SHORTCOMINGS THE COMMISSION’S CURRENT REFORM IS NOT SUPPORTED BY AN EVALUATION OF THE 2008 HEALTH CHECK 50. 
33 OCENJEVANJE UČINKA SHEM, KI GA IZVAJA KOMISIJA, IMA NEKAJ POMANJKLJIVOSTI SEDANJA REFORMA, KI JO JE PRIPRAVILA KOMISIJA, NE TEMELJI NA OCENAH IZ PREGLEDA STANJA SKP IZ LETA 2008 50.
The Commission contracted several evaluation studies relevant to the two sectors which also addressed the audited schemes and the effects of various support measures to the two sectors. 
Komisija je naročila več ocenjevalnih študij, povezanih s tema sektorjema, ki so obravnavale tudi revidirani shemi in učinke različnih podpornih ukrepov na ta sektorja.