natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C 41/32 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2005 As regards the impact of the CMO, the Commission would also like to point out that the measures launched in 2002 under the Community Tobacco Fund have been shown to have an impact on public awareness of the negative impact of tobacco consumption. 
C 41/32 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 17.2.2005 As regards the impact of the CMO, the Commission would also like to point out that the measures launched in 2002 under the Community Tobacco Fund have been shown to have an impact on public awareness of the negative impact of tobacco consumption.
The reform adopted will allow application of conditionality and thus improved respect of environmental requirements. 
The reform adopted will allow application of condition-ality and thus improved respect of environmental requirements.
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/33 Clearly, the tobacco support regime in place prior to the 1998 reform was not geared to solving the key problem in the sector: the growing of qualities which were not suited to the market. 
17.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 41/33 Clearly, the tobacco support regime in place prior to the 1998 reform was not geared to solving the key problem in the sector: the growing of qualities which were not suited to the market.
The effects started to become visible only after 2001. 
The effects started to become vis-ible only after 2001.
C 41/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2005 102. 
C 41/34 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 17.2.2005 102.
As the Court points out (and as the Commission explained in response to question 102), rapid introduction of this reform will help eradicate the weaknesses identified by the Court while avoiding a disruptive impact on tobacco-producing regions. 
As the Court points out (and as the Commission explained in response to question 102), rapid introduction of this reform will help eradicate the weaknesses identified by the Court while avoiding a disrup-tive impact on tobacco-producing regions.
Background............................................................ MaincharacteristicsofmeasurestopreventandcontrolFMD ..................... Impactonthebudget .................................................... 
Vplivnaproračun....................................................... RevizijaSodišča.........................................................
TheCourtŐsaudit........................................................ 
Postopekanalizenibilposodobljen .........................................
Commission supervision was insufficient in some respects and deficiencies in the regula-tionswerenotremediedintime ............................................ 
Komisija v nekaterih pogledih ni izvajala zadostnega nadzora, pomanjkljivosti v predpi-sihpanisobilepravočasnoodpravljene ......................................
Transposition of Community directives into national law not systematically verified forcompliance ..................................................... 
Pri prenosu direktiv Skupnosti v nacionalne zakonodaje preverjanje skladnosti ni bilo izvedenosistematično ................................................
Incomplete identification and inadequate tracing of animals of FMD sensitive species............................................................ 
Zdravstveni in veterinarski pregledi na mejah Unije so bili dobro nadzorovani, vendar pa določena tveganja niso bila ustrezno predvidena v predpisih . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMMISSIONACTIONDURINGTHECRISIS..................................... 
Kriteriji za načrtovanje ukrepov držav članic ob nepredvidljivih dogodkih in kontro-lateganačrtovanjasobilineprimerni....................................
Deficiencies in control arrangements and in the implementation of them in the Member States................................................................. 
Pomanjkljivosti sistema ANIMO niso bile odpravljene pred začetkom krize .............................................................
C 54/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 Reducedveterinaryservices ........................................... 
C 54/2 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 3.3.2005 Pomanjkanjeosebjavveterinarskihslužbah ...............................
Rules and procedures governing eligibility of Member StatesŐ expenditure for Community reimbursementweredefinedlate ........................................... DelaysinreimbursingMemberStatesŐexpenditure ......................... 
Komisija ni predlagala direktiv v zvezi s postopki, po katerih države članice izračunavajo inizplačujejonadomestilakmetom ......................................... Sistemi izplačevanja nadomestil so se razlikovali, ocene pa so bile neenotne..........................................................
27 CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 
Stopnjasofinanciranjausklajenalezaprašiče..................................
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. The need to complete the single market and promote trade in livestock in general made it essential for the Community to establish a common policy for preventing and controlling foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). 
3.3.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije POVZETEK I. Zaradi potrebe po uresničitvi skupnega trga in spodbujanju trgovine z živino je morala Skupnost oblikovati skupno politiko za preprečevanje in nadziranje slinavke in parkljevke.
As from 1992, therefore, it extended to all Member States the ban on preventive vaccination of livestock against the disease and introduced a complex system of prevention and control with the aim of both restricting the introduction of the virus and preventing it from spreading throughout the territory of the Community. 
Tako je od leta 1992 za vse države članice uvedla prepoved preventivnega cepljenja živine proti tej bolezni in kompleksen sistem preprečevanja in nadziranja, z namenom, da bi se na celotnem ozemlju Skupnosti omejil vnos virusa in preprečilo njegovo razširjanje.
In the event of an epidemic, contaminated animals were to be slaughtered, the carcasses destroyed, and premises and equipment disinfected. 
V primeru epidemije je bil predviden zakol živali, sežig trupel in razkužitev prostorov ter opreme.
All the expenditure defrayed by Member States in this connection would then become partially reimbursable from an emergency veterinary fund set up within the EAGGF Guarantee Section. 
Vsi stroški držav članic, ki bi s tem nastali, bi bili delno povrnjeni iz veterinarskega sklada za nujne primere, ki je bil ustanovljen v okviru Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS.
Following the 2001 crisis Member States requested reimbursement of 1 616 million euro from the emergency veterinary fund. 
Po krizi leta 2001 so države članice zahtevale povračila v znesku 1 616 milijonov EUR iz veterinarskega sklada za nujne primere.
That cost, combined with the scale of the outbreak, was the motivation for the CourtŐs audit. The audit had three objectives: to ascertain, firstly, whether the analytical method used by the Commission as the basis for the strategy for eradicating the disease was up-to-date; secondly, whether the strategy had been implemented effectively; and thirdly, whether the system for reimbursing to Member States expenditure on compensating farmers and slaughtering their animals was adequate, rapid and non-discriminatory. 
Ta odhodek kot tudi razsežnost epidemije sta spodbudila Sodišče, da opravi revizijo, ki je imela tri cilje: ugotoviti, ali je bil postopek analize, ki ga je uporabila Komisija kot osnovo za oblikovanje strategije za boj proti bolezni, posodobljen, ali je bila strategija učinkovito izvajana ter ali je bil sistem povračila izdatkov državam članicam – za nadomestila, ki so jih izplačale kmetom in namenile za zakol njihovih živali – hiter in nediskriminatoren.
In as far as some of the lessons learned from previous epidemics might be relevant to the strategy for preventing and controlling FMD, the Court examined Commission action before, during and after the crisis. 
Ker so nekatere izkušnje iz prejšnjih epidemij lahko koristne za oblikovanje strategije preprečevanja in nadziranja slinavke in parkljevke, je Sodišče vzelo pod drobnogled ukrepe Komisije pred začetkom krize, med krizo in po njej.
The report makes the point that, before the 2001 crisis, the Commission had not revised its strategy in the light of changes in risk factors. 
V tem poročilu je poudarjeno, da Komisija pred krizo leta 2001 kljub spremembam, ki so se pojavile pri dejavnikih tveganja, ni posodobila svoje strategije.
It also shows that in the absence of comprehensive evaluation and inspections by the Commission before 2001, some weaknesses in the prevention and control arrangements were not corrected in time, especially as regards protective measures at borders, animal feed, contingency plans, sheep identification, and the messaging system concerning livestock movements between Member States (ANIMO). 
V poročilu je navedeno tudi, da zaradi dejstva, da Komisija ni naredila podrobne ocene in da pred letom 2001 ni vršila zadostnega nadzora, niso bile pravočasno odpravljene nekatere pomanjkljivosti pri preprečevanju in nadzoru ukrepov, predvsem v zvezi z zaščito na mejah, živalsko krmo, načrti ukrepov ob nepredvidljivih dogodkih, identifikacijo ovac in sistemom obveščanja o gibanju živine med državami članicami (ANIMO).
Parliament criticised the Commission for failing to review Member StatesŐ contingency plans before the crisis, but acknowledged that the Commission acted very positively during it (1). 
Parlament je kritiziral Komisijo, ker pred krizo ni posodobila načrtov ukrepov držav članic ob nepredvidljivih dogodkih, vendar pa je potrdil, da je med krizo primerno ukrepala (1).
At the time of the crisis the Commission did, in fact, identify very quickly the weaknesses of the arrangements and their implementation in the Member States, as regards the number of veterinarians, disease notification and rapid culling, but it was too late to remedy them. 
V času krize je Komisija namreč zelo hitro odkrila pomanjkljivosti sistema ukrepov in uporabe tega sistema v državah članicah, in sicer v zvezi s številom veterinarjev, prijavo bolezni in hitrostjo zakola, vendar je bilo za odpravo teh pomanjkljivosti prepozno.
More particularly, the Court observed that the effectiveness of the arrangements that had been introduced relied heavily on farmers notifying the disease immediately and complying with movement restrictions. 
Natančneje, Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je bila učinkovitost uvedenih ukrepov močno odvisna od tega, ali so kmetje takoj prijavili bolezen in ali so spoštovali omejitve gibanja živali.
V. The audit showed that the Community financing system could be further improved. 
V. Revizija je pokazala, da bi bilo finančni sistem Skupnosti mogoče izboljšati.
The compensation paid to farmers by Member States was not always adequately defined at Community level, even though it was reimbursed at a rate of 60 % of the amount accepted as eligible by the Commission. 
Nadomestila, ki so jih kmetom izplačale države članice, niso bila vedno ustrezno določena na ravni Skupnosti, čeprav so bila povrnjena po stopnji 60 % od zneska, ki ga je Komisija priznala kot upravičenega.
In the absence of a better-defined Community framework Member States were able to introduce a variety of systems that gave rise to variations in the treatment of farmers within the Community. 
Zaradi slabo določenega okvira na ravni Skupnosti so države članice lahko izvajale različne sisteme, kar je povzročilo razliko pri obravnavanju kmetov znotraj Skupnosti.
Since then, the recent revision of the Community regulations has remedied many omissions. 
Nedavna dopolnitev predpisov Skupnosti je odpravila številne pomanjkljivosti.
Nevertheless, the financial framework was not revised and the Community measures are still minimal in terms of the notification of the disease, supervision of farms and speed of culling. 
Vendar pa je finančni okvir ostal nespremenjen, ukrepi Skupnosti glede prijave bolezni, nadzora kmetij in hitrosti zakola pa so še vedno minimalni.
There is thus a risk that Member StatesŐ application of these measures could once again prove to be insufficient to contain a future epidemic, and yet still give rise to Community reimbursement. 
Zato obstaja tveganje, da bodo ti ukrepi, ki jih izvajajo države članice, spet nezadostni, da bi obvladali morebitno epidemijo v prihodnosti, medtem ko bo morala Skupnost vseeno povrniti izdatke.
The Court recommends that the Commission update its evaluations and analyses of the strategy at a time when there is no crisis. 
Sodišče priporoča, da Komisija v nekriznem obdobju posodobi svoje ocene in analize strategije.
It is in favour of examining ways of including farmers in the control system, to induce them to notify the disease rapidly and to comply with movement restrictions. 
Obenem priporoča uporabo možnosti vključitve kmetov v sistem nadzora, in sicer s hitro prijavo bolezni in spoštovanjem omejitev gibanja.
Lastly, it calls on the Commission to clarify the financial framework as applied to epidemics of animal disease and, as far as possible, to reduce financial risk to the Community budget. 
In nazadnje, Komisijo poziva, da razjasni finančni okvir, ki se uporablja za epidemije živalskih bolezni, in, kolikor je le mogoče, zmanjša finančno tveganje za proračun Skupnosti.
C 54/3 (1) European Parliament resolution adopted on 17 December 2002, paragraph 54. 
C 54/3 (1) Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 17. decembra 2002, odstavek 54.
C 54/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 INTRODUCTION Background 1. Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a disease of animals, harmless to humans, but highly contagious among cloven-footed animals. 
C 54/4 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 3.3.2005 UVOD Ozadje 1. Slinavka in parkljevka je živalska bolezen, ki ni nevarna za človeka, vendar izredno nalezljiva za parkljarje.
It can destroy the food sources and means of subsistence of farmers in less developed countries virtually overnight because it affects many cloven-footed species, including cattle, pigs and sheep. 
V manj razvitih državah lahko skoraj čez noč uniči preskrbo z živili in sredstva za preživljanje rejcev, ker prizadene veliko vrst parkljarjev, med katerimi so govedo, prašiči in ovce.
The virus can be transmitted by direct contact between animals and through animal feed, by indirect contact with various vectors, such as vehicles or people, and may even be spread by wind-borne transmission. 
Virus se lahko prenaša z neposrednim stikom med živalmi in živalsko krmo, s posrednim stikom z različnimi prenašalci, kot so avtomobili, tovornjaki in ljudje, ter tudi po zraku z vetrom.
The mortality rate among infected adult animals is low. 
Med okuženimi odraslimi živalmi je stopnja smrtnosti nizka.
Most animals recover within three to four weeks, but they are nevertheless still severely affected: the growth of young animals is retarded, the abortion rate increases and milk production declines significantly, and permanently. 
Čeprav večina živali ozdravi v treh ali štirih tednih, ostanejo resne posledice: rast mladih živali se upočasni, število splavljenih zarodkov se poveča, medtem ko se proizvodnja mleka zelo in trajno zmanjša.
Countries that are free of the disease are obliged to put security measures in place, in order to protect themselves against the virus and avoid embargoes on their exports of animal products. 
Države, v katerih te bolezni ni, morajo vzpostaviti varnostne ukrepe, da se zavarujejo pred virusom in preprečijo embargo na izvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora.
The completion of the internal market within the Community was planned for January 1993. 
Dokončanje notranjega trga v Skupnosti je bilo predvideno za januar 1993.
Consequently, since the free movement of animals and agricultural products is a fundamental aspect of the common organisation of markets, the rules on trade in animals and animal products within the Community had to be harmonised. 
Zato je bilo treba uskladiti prost pretok živali in kmetijskih proizvodov, ki je temeljni element skupnih ureditev trgov, ter pravila o trgovini z živalmi in proizvodi živalskega izvora.
That also required the establishment of a common policy for preventing and controlling FMD. 
To je zahtevalo tudi oblikovanje skupne politike za preprečevanje in nadzor slinavke in parkljevke.
In a 1989 report on Member StatesŐ policies for controlling FMD (2), the Commission noted that some Member States that did not practise preventive vaccination of livestock (3) could impose restrictions on trade in animals with Community partners that did vaccinate. 
Komisija je torej v poročilu o politikah držav članic na področju nadzora slinavke in parkljevke (2) iz leta 1989 navedla, da so nekatere med njimi, ki niso preventivno cepile živine (3), lahko omejile trgovino z živalmi s tistimi partnerji Skupnosti, ki so živino cepili.
The restrictions were justified by the fact that even though vaccinated animals appear clinically normal they may be carrying the virus. 
Te omejitve so utemeljile z dejstvom, da so lahko cepljene živali, čeprav se zdijo klinično zdrave, nosilke virusa.
In order to remove veterinary and similar obstacles to the development of intra-Community trade in animals and animal products the Commission considered health regulations applicable to international trade in animals and animal products, such (2) Report from the Commission to the Council on a study carried out by the Commission on policies currently applied by Member States in the control of foot-and-mouth disease, Commission of the European Communities, SEC (89) 1731 final, 18 October 1989. 
Komisija je, zato da bi odpravila veterinarske in zootehnične ovire pri razvoju trgovine z živalmi in proizvodi živalskega izvora znotraj Skupnosti, upoštevala predpise v zvezi (2) Poročilo Komisije Svetu o študiji, ki jo je Komisija opravila o aktualnih politikah držav članic na področju nadzora slinavke in parkljevke, Komisija Evropskih skupnosti, SEC(89) 1731 konč. z dne 18. oktobra 1989.
(3) Preventive vaccination should not be confused with emergency vac-cination; the latter is possible if an outbreak occurs. 
(3) Preventivno cepljenje je zaščitno cepljenje goveda, ki se ne sme za-menjevati s cepljenjem v nujnih primerih, ki je mogoče v primeru pojava izbruha.
Two different policies were being applied in 1988: eight Member States (Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal) vaccinated livestock as a precautionary measure, followed by partial or total stamping out of contaminated animals if the disease occurred. 
Leta 1988 sta se izvajali dve različni politiki: osem držav članic (Belgija, Nemčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Luksemburg, Nizozemska, Portugalska) je izvajalo preventivno cepljenje živine, ki mu je v primeru pojava bolezni sledil delen ali popoln zakol okuženih živali.
The other Member States (Denmark, Greece, Ireland and the United Kingdom) did not carry out preventive vaccination and eradicated all animals in the event of an FMD outbreak. as those laid down by the Office international des Epizooties (OIE) (4). 
Nasprotno, druge države članice (Danska, Grčija, Irska in Združeno kraljestvo) niso izvajale preventivnega cepljenja in so v primeru pojava izbruha takoj zaklale vse živali. z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, kot jih je določil Mednarodni urad za kužne bolezni (OIE) (4) ter se uporabljajo v mednarodni trgovini z živalmi in proizvodi živalskega izvora.
Under its rules, if there were an outbreak of FMD, return to unrestricted trading conditions would be much faster if a stamping-out policy were applied (three months) than if any kind of vaccination were used (12 to 24 months). 
Ti predpisi v primeru epidemije slinavke in parkljevke predvidevajo hitrejšo ponovno vzpostavitev proste trgovine, če so bolne živali zaklane (po treh mesecih), kot v primeru, da se izvede katero koli cepljenje (po 12 do 24 mesecih).
Because of these commercial considerations, the same Commission report concluded that the adoption of a non-vaccination policy was preferable to a policy of preventive vaccination. 
Komisija je zaradi teh trgovinskih vidikov v istem poročilu ugotovila, da je politika necepljenja boljša od politike preventivnega cepljenja.
This was why the stamping-out policy was supplemented at Community level, in 1990 (5), by the ban on preventive vaccination and by prohibition of imports of vaccinated animals into Community territory. 
Zato so leta 1990 (5) na ravni Skupnosti politiko popolnega uničenja dopolnili s prepovedjo preventivnega cepljenja in uvoza cepljenih živali na ozemlje Skupnosti.
However, it was still possible to vaccinate, but only as an emergency measure when the presence of FMD had been confirmed and there was a danger of large-scale spread of the disease. 
Kljub temu je bilo še vedno mogoče uporabiti cepljenje, vendar samo v nujnih primerih, kadar je bila potrjena prisotnost slinavke in parkljevke, ki bi lahko dosegla velike razsežnosti.
Since the adoption of this new strategy there have been several outbreaks in the Union, in Italy in 1993 (57 outbreaks) and in Greece, in 1994, 1996 and 2000 (95, 39 and 14 outbreaks respectively). 
Po sprejetju te nove strategije se je v Uniji pojavilo še veliko izbruhov, leta 1993 v Italiji (57 izbruhov) ter v letih 1994, 1996 in 2000 v Grčiji (95, 39 in 14 izbruhov).
Epidemics have occurred in neighbouring areas (Albania, Macedonia, Kosovo, Algeria, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkey and Iran). 
Epidemije so se pojavile na sosednjih območjih (v Albaniji, Makedoniji, na Kosovu, v Alžiriji, Gruziji, Armeniji, Azerbajdžanu, Turčiji in Iranu).
In addition, on 21 February 2001, an unprecedented crisis hit the United Kingdom and lasted for a period of 10 months. 
Poleg tega je 21. februarja 2001 v Združenem kraljestvu izbruhnila kriza brez primere, ki je trajala deset mesecev.
There were 2 034 outbreaks of infection extending to 10 124 farms and leading to the slaughter of some four million animals (6). 
Odkritih je bilo 2 034 izbruhov okužbe, ki se je razširila na 10 124 kmetijskih gospodarstev; zaklanih je bilo okrog štiri milijone živali (6).
In addition, more than two million animals were slaughtered because of the welfare problems that arose when they were confined to farms following movement restrictions (7). 
Več kot dva milijona živali je bilo dodatno zaklanih zaradi zdravstvenih težav, ki so se pojavile, ker so bile zaradi omejitve premikov (7) zaprte na gospodarstvih.
It was not possible to contain FMD to the United Kingdom: it spread, on 13 March 2001 to France (two out-breaks), on 20 March 2001 to Ireland (one outbreak), and on 21 March to the Netherlands (26 outbreaks). 
Slinavke in parkljevke ni bilo mogoče omejiti na Združeno kraljestvo: 13. marca 2001 se je razširila v Francijo (dva izbruha), 20. marca 2001 na Irsko (en iz-bruh) in 21. marca na Nizozemsko (26 izbruhov).
The United Kingdom had to apply slaughter measures until September 2001. 
V Združenem kraljestvu so morali živali klati do septembra 2001.
In January 2002 it was able to recover the status of an FMD-free country that did not practise vaccination, which allowed it to start trading again. 
Država je lahko januarja 2002 spet dobila status države, proste slinavke in parkljevke, ki ne izvaja cepljenja, zaradi česar je lahko znova začela trgovati.
(4) An intergovernmental organisation set up in 1924. The World Trade Agreement recognises the OIE standards as a reference for international animal health rules. 
(4) Medvladna organizacija, ustanovljena leta 1924, katere standarde priznava Svetovna trgovinska organizacija kot mednarodne predpise v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali.