natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1 4 Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
1 2 3 4 Uredba (EU) št. 1307/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o pravilih za neposredna plačila kmetom na podlagi shem podpore v okviru skupne kmetijske politike ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
Farm accountancy data network (FADN): An instrument for evaluating the income of commercial agricultural holdings and the impacts of the CAP. 
Mreža za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov s kmetijskih gospodarstev (FADN): instrument za vrednotenje dohodka komercialnih kmetijskih gospodarstev ter učinkov SKP.
It is based on the accounting data of a sample of more than 80 000 agricultural holdings across all the EU Member States. 
Temelji na računovodskih podatkih vzorca več kot 80 000 kmetijskih gospodarstev iz vseh držav članic EU.
Managing authority: The local, regional or national body appointed by the Member State to submit a Rural Development Programme to the Commission and then manage and implement it. 
5 Organ upravljanja: lokalni, regionalni ali nacionalni organ, ki ga imenuje država članica.
Paying Agency: The national or regional body responsible for assessing, calculating and paying out agricultural subsidies. 
Plačilna agencija: nacionalni ali regionalni organ, pristojen za ocenjevanje, izračun in izplačilo kmetijskih subvencij.
Payment entitlements: Introduced by the 2003 reform of the CAP to implement the single payment scheme. 
Plačilne pravice: plačilne pravice so bile uvedene leta 2003 z reformo SKP za izvajanje sheme enotnega plačila.
Payment entitlements were distributed to farmers based on historical data (at regional or individual farmer level). 
Razdeljene so bile med kmete na podlagi preteklih podatkov (na regionalni ravni ali na ravni posameznega kmeta).
Following the 2003 reform, to qualify for a single payment, a farmer had to activate the payment entitlements that he or she held together 5 with the same number of eligible agricultural hectares. 
Po reformi iz leta 2003 je moral vsak kmet, ki je hotel prejeti enotno plačilo, aktivirati plačilne pravice, ki jih je imel skupaj z enakim številom upravičenih hektarov kmetijskih površin.
The 2013 reform replaced these payment entitlements with newly-established payment entitlements under the basic payment scheme. 
Z reformo iz leta 2013 so bile te plačilne pravice nadomeščene z novovzpostavljenimi plačilnimi pravicami v okviru sheme osnovnega plačila.
By derogation, some Member States that fulfilled certain conditions may keep existing payment entitlements. 
Na podlagi odstopanja lahko nekatere države članice, ki izpolnjuje nekatere pogoje, ohranijo obstoječe plačilne pravice.
Programming period: Multiannual framework planning and implementing EU policies such as the rural development policy. 
Programsko obdobje: večletni okvir za načrtovanje in izvajanje politik EU, kot je politika razvoja podeželja.
This audit concerns the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 periods. 
Ta revizija se nanaša na obdobji 2007–2013 in 2014–2020.
Result: The immediate effects of the programme on direct addresses or recipients. 
Rezultat: takojšnji učinek programa na neposredne naslovnike ali prejemnike.
Rural Development Programme (RDP): A programming document prepared by a Member State and approved by the Commission for planning and monitoring the implementation of the EU rural development policy at regional or national level. 
SKP (skupna kmetijska politika): sklop zakonodaje in praks, ki jih je Evropska unija sprejela, da bi zagotovila skupno in poenoteno politiko na področju kmetijstva. Začetni ukrepi so bili uvedeni leta 1962.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The overall number of farmers in the EU-27 has fallen rapidly in the last decade, dropping from 14.5 million farmers in 2005 to 10.7 million farmers in 2013. 
7 POVZETEK I. Skupno število kmetov v EU-27 se je v zadnjem desetletju hitro zmanjšalo, in sicer s 14,5 milijona leta 2005 na 10,7 milijona leta 2013.
The number of young farmers (up to 44 years old) fell from 3.3 million in 2005 to 2.3 million in 2013. 
Število mladih kmetov (starih do 44 let) se je zmanjšalo s 3,3 milijona leta 2005 na 2,3 milijona leta 2013.
As the number of farmers decreased across all age groups, the percentage of young farmers in the farming population remained relatively stable, at just above 20 %. 
Ker se je število kmetov zmanjšalo v vseh starostnih skupinah, je delež mladih kmetov v kmetijskem prebivalstvu ostal razmeroma stabilen, in sicer tik nad 20 %.
However, significant differences exist between Member States. 
Vendar med državami članicami obstajajo bistvene razlike.
In 2007-2020 the EU allocated 9.6 billion euro in specific aid to young farmers to enhance the competitiveness of agricultural holdings and generational renewal in agriculture. 
V obdobju 2007–2020 je EU za mlade kmete dodelila posebno pomoč v znesku 9,6 milijarde EUR za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti kmetijskih gospodarstev in generacijsko pomladitev v kmetijstvu.
Including co-financing from Member States of Pillar 2 setting-up measure, total public support amounts to 18.3 billion euro. 
Skupaj s sofinanciranjem držav članic za ukrep za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra skupna javna podpora znaša 18,3 milijarde EUR.
Almost 200 000 young farmers received EU aid for setting up in the 2007-2013 period. 
V obdobju 2007–2013 je skoraj 200 000 mladih kmetov prejelo pomoč EU za mlade prevzemnike kmetij.
More than 70 % of the EU funding was provided under the Pillar 2 (EAFRD) measure for the setting up of young farmers, while the remaining 30 % is provided, in 2014-2020, under the Pillar 1 (EAGF) direct payment to young farmers. 
Več kot 70 % financiranja EU je bilo zagotovljenega za ukrep za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra (EKSRP), preostalih 30 % pa so v obdobju 2014–2020 v okviru 1. stebra (EKJS) prejeli mladi kmetje v obliki neposrednih plačil.
Against this backdrop, we examined the role of the EU in supporting young farmers and fostering generational renewal. 
Sodišče je preučilo vlogo EU pri podpiranju mladih kmetov in spodbujanju generacijske pomladitve.
The audit was carried out at the Commission and in the four Member States with most spending for young farmers: France, Spain, Poland and Italy. 
Revizija je bila izvedena na Komisiji in v štirih državah članicah z večino porabe za mlade kmete: v Franciji, Španiji, na Poljskem in v Italiji.
The audit aimed to answer the following question: ‘Is the EU support to young farmers well designed to contribute effectively towards improved generational renewal?’ IV. 
Z revizijo je Sodišče želelo odgovoriti na naslednje vprašanje: „Ali je podpora EU za mlade kmete zasnovana tako, da uspešno prispeva k boljši generacijski pomladitvi?“ IV.
The overall conclusion is that EU support for young farmers is based on a poorly-defined intervention logic, with no expected result and impact specified. 
Splošni zaključek je, da podpora EU za mlade kmete temelji na slabo opredeljeni intervencijski logiki, za katero niso določeni pričakovani rezultati in učinek.
It should be better targeted to foster effective generational renewal. 
Morala bi biti bolje usmerjena, da bi spodbujala učinkovito generacijsko pomladitev.
V. For Pillar 1 payment to young farmers we found that: - the aid is not based on a sound needs assessment and its objective does not reflect the general objective of encouraging generational renewal. The Member States did not coordinate Pillar 1 payment with the Pillar 2 setting-up measure or national measures; 8 
V. Glede plačila za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra smo ugotovili, da: - pomoč ni temeljila na dobri oceni potreb, njen cilj pa ne odraža splošnega cilja spodbujanja generacijske pomladitve. Države članice niso uskladile plačil v okviru 1.
- in the absence of a needs assessment the aid is provided in a standardized form (annual payment per hectare), in an amount and in a timing where it is unclear which specific needs other than additional income are addressed; - the common monitoring and evaluation framework did not provide useful indicators for assessing the effectiveness of this payment, as there are no results indicators for this payment and data on the income and viability of the supported holdings are not collected. 
stebra z ukrepom za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra ali nacionalnimi ukrepi, - se pomoč, ker ni ocene potreb, zagotavlja v standardizirani obliki (letno plačilo na hektar) ter v višini in v času, za katera ni jasno, katere specifične potrebe razen dodatnega dohodka naj bi obravnavala, - skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja ni zagotovil uporabnih kazalnikov za oceno uspešnosti tega plačila, ker za to plačilo ni kazalnikov rezultatov niti se ne zbirajo podatki o dohodkih in sposobnosti preživetja podprtih gospodarstev.
For Pillar 2 measure for setting up of young farmers we found that: - although it is generally based on a vague needs assessment, its objectives are partially specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed and reflect the general objective of encouraging generational renewal. 
Glede ukrepa za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra je Sodišče ugotovilo, da: - ima ukrep kljub temu, da na splošno temelji na nejasni oceni potreb, cilje, ki so deloma specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, ustrezni in časovno opredeljeni in ki odražajo splošni cilj spodbujanja generacijske pomladitve.
There is some effective coordination with the Pillar 2 investment measure; - the aid is provided in a form (lump sum subject to the accomplishment of a business plan and, in some cases, also an interest subsidy on a loan) addressing more directly the young farmers’ needs of access to land, capital and knowledge. 
Ukrep se uspešno usklajuje z naložbenim ukrepom v okviru 2. stebra, - se pomoč zagotavlja v obliki (pavšalni znesek za izvedbo poslovnega načrta in v nekaterih primerih tudi subvencioniranje obresti za posojilo), ki bolj neposredno obravnava potrebe mladih kmetov po dostopu do zemljišč, kapitala in znanja.
The amount of aid is generally linked to the needs and modulated to prompt specific actions (e.g. introducing organic farming, water-or energy-saving initiatives); - the aid is directed to more qualified farmers, who commit to implement a business plan guiding them in developing viable holdings and who are often encouraged through the project selection process to set up in less favoured areas. 
Znesek pomoči je običajno povezan s potrebami in prilagojen za spodbujanje posebnih ukrepov (npr. uvedba ekološkega kmetovanja, pobude za varčevanje z vodo ali energijo), - je pomoč usmerjena v bolj usposobljene kmete, ki se zavežejo k izvedbi poslovnega načrta, s katerim bodo razvili kmetijska gospodarstva s sposobnostjo preživetja, in ki se jih s postopkom izbire projektov spodbuja k prevzemu kmetijskega gospodarstva na območjih z omejenimi možnostmi.
However, the business plans were of variable quality and managing authorities in some cases did not apply selection procedures to prioritise best projects. 
Toda poslovni načrti so bili različno kakovostni, organi upravljanja pa v nekaterih primerih niso uporabljali izbirnih postopkov za prednostno razvrščanje najboljših projektov.
Selection criteria were introduced late in the 2007-2013 period, minimum thresholds were either too low or non-existent and the seven-year budget for the measure was used up in some Member States to fund nearly all applications submitted at the start of the programming period, thus preventing young farmers who set up later from receiving funding; - we found little evidence about whether the EU measures facilitated the setting-up of young farmers and improved generational renewal and the viability of the supported 9 holdings, mainly because of the low quality of indicators set by the common monitoring system. 
Izbirna merila so bila uvedena pozno v programskem obdobju 2007–2013, minimalni pragovi so bili prenizki ali pa jih sploh ni bilo, poleg tega je bil v nekaterih državah članicah sedemletni proračun za ukrep že na začetku programskega obdobja porabljen za financiranje skoraj vseh vloženih prošenj, 9 zaradi česar mladi kmetje, ki so gospodarstvo prevzeli kasneje, niso več mogli prejeti finančnih sredstev, - je Sodišče našlo malo dokazov o tem, ali so ukrepi EU mladim kmetom olajšali prevzem gospodarstev in izboljšali generacijsko pomladitev in sposobnost preživetja podprtih gospodarstev, predvsem zaradi slabe kakovosti kazalnikov, določenih v skupnem sistemu spremljanja.
We recommend that Commission and the Member States: (a) improve the intervention logic by reinforcing needs assessment and defining SMART objectives, which will reflect the overall objective of fostering the generational renewal; (b) improve the targeting of the measures through better project selection systems and use of business plans; (c) improve the monitoring and evaluation framework by drawing on best practices developed by Member States in their monitoring systems and evaluation reports. 10 
Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija in države članice: (a) izboljšajo intervencijsko logiko z izboljšanjem ocene potreb in opredelitvijo ciljev SMART, ki bodo odražali skupni cilj spodbujanja generacijske pomladitve, (b) bolje ciljno usmerjajo ukrepe z boljšimi sistemi za izbor projektov in uporabo poslovnih načrtov, (c) izboljšajo okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja z uporabo najboljših praks, ki so jih razvile države članice v svojih sistemih spremljanja in ocenjevalnih poročilih. 10
INTRODUCTION A decreasing farming population 1. 
UVOD Manjšanje kmetijskega prebivalstva 1.
EU agriculture is facing a decreasing farming population. 
Kmetijstvo EU se sooča z manjšanjem kmetijskega prebivalstva.
The overall number of farmers in the EU-275 has rapidly decreased in the last decade, falling from 14.5 million in 2005 to 10.7 million in 2013, i.e. a reduction of one fourth in less than a decade. 
Skupno število kmetov v EU-275 se je v zadnjem desetletju hitro zmanjšalo, in sicer s 14,5 milijona leta 2005 na 10,7 milijona leta 2013, torej za četrtino v manj kot desetletju.
All age groups of farmers were affected (see Figure 1). 
Do zmanjšanja je prišlo v vseh starostnih skupinah kmetov (glej sliko 1).
It is not possible to know the number of farmers up to 40 years old as Eurostat data does not split the age group 35-44 years old into further sub-groups6. 11 5 6 Croatia was not included in the statistics up to 2013. 
Števila kmetov, mlajših od 40 let, ni mogoče ugotoviti, saj Eurostat starostne skupine 35–44 let ne deli na podskupine.6 11 5 6 Hrvaška ni bila vključena v statistične podatke do leta 2013.
Eurostat provides data for the following age groups: less than 35, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, more than 65 years. 
Eurostat objavlja podatke za naslednje starostne skupine: manj kot 35 let, 35–44 let, 45–54 let, 55–64 let in več kot 65 let.
Figure 1 - Evolution of the number of farmers by age group in the 27 EU Member States 7 The Farm Structure Survey is carried out every three years by all Member States with a common methodology and provides therefore comparable and representative statistics over time across Member States. 
Slika 1 – Spreminjanje števila kmetov po starostnih skupinah v 27 državah članicah EU Vir: Eurostat, raziskava o strukturi kmetijskih gospodarstev7 2.
2. 3. 44 5 
Število mladih kmetov (starih do 44 let) se je s 3,3 milijona leta 2005 zmanjšalo na 2,3 milijona leta 2013, torej za tretjino v manj kot desetletju.
However, the percentage of young farmers in the farming population remained relatively stable, at just above 20 % (see Figure 2). millions 
Toda delež mladih kmetov v kmetijskem prebivalstvu je ostal razmeroma stabilen, in sicer tik nad 20 % (glej sliko 2).
3. 4 6 7 
Med državami članicami so bistvene razlike: na Poljskem, na primer, se je delež mladih kmetov v kmetijskem prebivalstvu povečal s 34 % leta 2007 na 36 % leta 2013, v Španiji pa se je zmanjšal z 21 % leta 2007 na 16 % leta 2013.
Annex I provides an overview of the number of farmers in individual Member States and of the variation between 2007 and 2013, while Annex II indicates the evolution of the distribution of farmers by age. 
V Prilogi I je prikazano število kmetov v posameznih državah članicah in spremembe med letoma 2007 in 2013, v Prilogi II pa je prikazano spreminjanje porazdelitve kmetov po starosti.
Generational renewal is high on the political agenda 4. 
Generacijska pomladitev je visoko uvrščena na politični agendi 4.
In 2008 the European Parliament considered that “generational change is necessary to preserve a high level of food quality and food safety within the EU as well as EU’s self-sufficiency in the future” and that “the CAP must seek to remove the barriers currently facing young people wishing to set up in farming, by making generational change one of its priorities”8. In 2011 it noted that “the measures for young farmers contained in the second 8 13 European Parliament resolution of 5 June 2008 on the future for young farmers under the ongoing reform of the CAP (2007/2194(INI)). 
Leta 2008 je Evropski parlament menil, da „je obnova generacij potrebna za visoko kakovost hrane, varnost oskrbe s hrano v EU, kakor tudi samozadostnost EU v prihodnosti” ter „da si mora SKP [...] prizadevati za odstranitev ovir, s katerimi se soočajo mladi, ki se želijo posvetiti kmetovanju, tako da postavi obnovo generacij za svojo prednostno nalogo”.8 Leta 2011 je navedel, „da ukrepi za mlade kmete v drugem stebru ne zadostujejo za 8 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. junija 2008 o tem, kakšno prihodnost prinaša mladim kmetovalcem tekoča reforma SKP (2007/2194(INI)).
Also the Council in 2014 pointed out10 that young farmers and generational renewal in agriculture are fundamental for the sustainability and long term competitiveness of European agriculture. 5. 
zaustavitev hitrega staranja v kmetijstvu” in „da je treba razširiti sheme podpor v drugem stebru”.9 Tudi Svet je leta 2014 poudaril, da so mladi kmetje in generacijska pomladitev v kmetijstvu temeljni za trajnostnost in dolgoročno konkurenčnost evropskega kmetijstva.10 5.
In 2015 the Commission argued11 that supporting young farmers is a priority. According to Commissioner Phil Hogan12: “... generational renewal is an issue that goes far beyond a reduction in the average age of farmers in the EU. 
Leta 2015 je Komisija zatrjevala, da je podpiranje mladih kmetov prioriteta.11 Komisar Phil Hogan12 je povedal, da generacijska pomladitev še zdaleč ne pomeni samo znižanja povprečne starosti kmetov v EU.
It is also about empowering a new generation of highly-qualified young farmers to bring the full benefits of technology to support sustainable farming practices in Europe”. 
Po njegovem mnenju gre tudi za omogočanje novi generaciji visokousposobljenih mladih kmetov, da v celoti izkoristijo prednosti tehnologije za podporo trajnostnih načinov kmetovanja v Evropi.
He stated that there are “barriers which hinder young people from taking up agricultural activity” naming access to land, finance and knowledge as the most significant. 
Povedal je še, da obstajajo ovire, zaradi katerih mladi težje začnejo izvajati kmetijsko dejavnost. Najpomembnejše med njimi so dostop do zemljišč, finančnih sredstev in znanja.
EU support for young farmers 6. 
Podpora EU za mlade kmete 6.
The total EU budget allocated specifically for the support to young farmers over the 2007-2020 period is 9.6 billion euro. 
Skupna proračunska sredstva EU, dodeljena posebej za podporo mladim kmetom v obdobju 2007–2020, znašajo 9,6 milijarde EUR.
It doubled from 3.2 billion euro in the 2007-2013 period, provided under the Pillar 2 setting-up measure, to 6.4 billion euro in the 2014-2020 period, mainly due to the introduction of an additional direct payment to young farmers under Pillar 1 (see Figure 3). 
S 3,2 milijarde EUR v obdobju 2007–2013, dodeljenih za ukrep za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra, so se podvojila na 6,4 milijarde EUR v obdobju 2014–2020, predvsem zaradi uvedbe dodatnega neposrednega plačila za mlade kmete v okviru 1. stebra (glej sliko 3).
Total public expenditure, including national co-financing by Member States of Pillar 2 setting-up measure, is 18.3 billion euro. 
Skupni javni odhodki, vključno z nacionalnim sofinanciranjem držav članic za ukrep za pomoč mladim prevzemnikom kmetij v okviru 2. stebra, znašajo 18,3 milijarde EUR.
9 10 11 12 European Parliament resolution of 23 June 2011 on the CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future (2011/2051(INI)). 
9 10 11 12 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. junija 2011 o skupni kmetijski politiki proti letu 2020: odziv na prihodnje izzive, povezane s hrano, naravnimi viri in ozemljem (2011/2051(INI)).
EU Council, Presidency conclusions on strengthening of EU policies for young farmers, Agriculture and Fisheries Council meeting Brussels, 15 December 2014. 
Svet EU, sklepi predsedstva o krepitvi politik EU za mlade kmete, seja Sveta za kmetijstvo in ribištvo, Bruselj, 15. decembra 2014.
European Commission, “Young farmers and the CAP”, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 2015. 
Evropska komisija, „Mladi kmetje in skupna kmetijska politika”, Luksemburg, Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2015.
Speech by Commissioner Phil Hogan at JOINT ENRD/CEJA Workshop on generational renewal – Brussels, 25 January 2017. 14 
Govor komisarja Phila Hogana na skupni delavnici ENRD/CEJA o generacijski pomladitvi – Bruselj, 25. januarja 2017. 14
Figure 3 - EU budget for support to young farmers under Pillar 1 (EAGF) and Pillar 2 (EAFRD) in the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 programming periods Source: ECA based on Commission’s data (2007-2013 expenditure and 2014-2020 allocations). 
Slika 3 – Proračunska sredstva EU za podporo mladim kmetom v okviru 1. stebra (EKJS) in 2. stebra (EKSRP) v programskih obdobjih 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi podatkov Komisije (odhodki za obdobje 2007–2013 in dodeljena proračunska sredstva za obdobje 2014–2020).
This measure was followed by the ‘Farm and business development’ measure in the 2014-2020 period. 
Temu ukrepu je v obdobju 2014–2020 sledil ukrep za razvoj kmetij in podjetij.
The measure is implemented in 92 out of the 118 Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) across 24 out of the 28 Member States. 
Ta ukrep se izvaja v 92 od 118 programov razvoja podeželja (PRP) v 24 od 28 držav članic. 8.
15 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Pillar 1 Pillar 2 3.23 3.80 2.62 2007-2013 2014-2020 13 14 Council Directive 81/528/EEC of 30 June 1981 amending Directive 72/159/EEC on the modernization of farms (OJ L 197, 20.7.1981, p. 
13 14 15 15 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1. steber 2. steber 3,23 3,80 2,62 2007–2013 2014–2020 Direktiva Sveta 81/528/EGS z dne 30. junija 1981 o spremembi Direktive 72/159/EGS o modernizaciji kmetij (UL L 197, 20.7.1981, str.
41) introducing, inter alia, specific measures aimed at young farmers under the age of 40. 
41), s katero so bili med drugim uvedeni posebni ukrepi, namenjenim mladim kmetom, mlajšim od 40 let.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 
1257/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) ter o spremembi in razveljavitvi določenih uredb (UL L 160, 26.6.1999, str.
80). billion euro 
80).
Figure 4 provides an overview of the EU instruments targeting – directly or indirectly – young farmers in the 2007-2020 period. 
Na sliki 4 je pregled instrumentov EU, neposredno ali posredno usmerjenih v mlade kmete v obdobju 2007–2020.