natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As previously acknowledged by the Commission, the categories for assessing the sufficiency of actions taken need to be harmonised and the RAD application developed in order to improve the information provided to management. 
Kot je Komisija v preteklosti že priznala, je treba uskladiti kategorije za oceno zadostnosti sprejetih ukrepov in nadalje razviti aplikacijo RAD zaradi izboljšanja informacij, zagotovljenih poslovodstvu.
Complementary to this, better follow-up leading to improved reporting on the adequacy and timeliness of corrective actions taken is needed and the Commission should designate a service to perform the work. 
Kot dopolnilo k temu je potrebno boljše nadaljnje ukrepanje na podlagi priporočil, ki bi privedlo k izboljšanemu poročanju o ustreznosti in pravočasnosti sprejetih popravljalnih ukrepov, Komisija pa bi morala določiti službo, ki bi opravljala to delo.
If achieved, an improved follow-up system would provide sufficient, reliable and pertinent information on improvements resulting from the Court’s audit recommendations and thus contribute to the sound financial management of the EU budget. 
Če bi bilo to doseženo, bi izboljšani sistem za nadaljnje ukrepanje na podlagi priporočil zagotavljal zadostne, zanesljive in relevantne informacije o izboljšavah, doseženih zaradi priporočil Sodišča, ter tako prispeval k zagotavljanju dobrega finančnega poslovodenja proračuna EU.
Conclusion and recommendation 18 29 In light of the shortcomings identified in the Commission’s current follow-up system, and the Commission’s previous acknowledgment of the need for improvements (SR 19/201313), we recommend that the Commission should carry out the necessary improvements to its systems in order to bring its practices into line with the relevant internal control standards, including: (a) explaining and/or documenting the status of actions taken on the recommendations; (b) reviewing the actions of Member States and agencies in addressing our audit recommendations; (c) reporting more fully in the annual activity reports or elsewhere on the actions taken in addressing recommendations; (d) reviewing recommendations assessed as partially implemented by the Court to reflect their actual status. 
Zaključek in priporočila 18 29 Glede na pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene v sedanjem sistemu Komisije za nadaljnje ukrepanje na podlagi priporočil, ter preteklo priznanje Komisije, da so potrebne izboljšave (Posebno poročilo št. 19/201313), naj Komisija uvede ustrezne izboljšave svojih sistemov, da bo uskladila svoje prakse z ustreznimi standardi notranje kontrole, kar bo zajemalo: (a) pojasnjevanje in/ali dokumentiranje stanja izvedbe ukrepov, sprejetih na podlagi priporočil; (b) pregledovanje ukrepov držav članic in agencij, s katerimi obravnavajo revizijska priporočila Sodišča; (c) izčrpnejše poročanje o ukrepih, sprejetih pri obravnavanju teh priporočil, v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih ali drugje; (d) pregledovanje priporočil, ki jih je Sodišče ocenilo kot deloma izvedena, tako da se bo odražalo njihovo dejansko stanje izvedbe.
This report was adopted by Chamber CEAD, headed by Mr Igors LUDBORŽS, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 19 January 2016. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat CEAD, ki ga vodi Igors LUDBORŽS, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 19. januarja 2016.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President 13 See paragraph VI from Executive summary. 
Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik 13 Glej odstavek VI povzetka.
Annexes 20 SR Per audit Paragraph RAD Fully implemented Implemented Not implemented Could not be verified No longer relevant In most respects In some respects SR 5/2012 CRIS 1 76 Done X 2 79 Done X 3 80 Cancelled X 4 81 Done X SR 15/2011 State aid 1 96a Done X 2 96b Done X 3 96c Done X 4 98a Rejected X 5 98b Done X 6 98c Done X 7 98d Done X 8 98e Done X 9 98f Done X 10 100a Done X 11 100b Rejected X TOTAL 44 44 23 11 3 1 3 3 ASSESSED 38 60 % 29 % 8% 3% Annex I 
Priloge 20 Posebno poročilo Na revizijo Odstavek RAD Izvedeno v celoti Izvedeno Ni izvedeno Ni bilo mogoče preveriti Ni več relevantno večinoma deloma Posebno poročilo št. 5/2012 CRIS 1 76 opravljeno X 2 79 opravljeno X 3 80 preklicano X 4 81 opravljeno X Posebno poročilo št. 15/2011 Državna pomoč 1 96a opravljeno X 2 96b opravljeno X 3 96c opravljeno X 4 98a zavrnjeno X 5 98b opravljeno X 6 98c opravljeno X 7 98d opravljeno X 8 98e opravljeno X 9 98f opravljeno X 10 100a opravljeno X 11 100b zavrnjeno X SKUPAJ 44 44 23 11 3 1 3 3 OCENJENO 38 60 % 29 % 8% 3% Priloga I
Annexes 21 Agriculture: management instruments applied to the market in milk and milk products 1. 
Priloge 21 Kmetijstvo: instrumenti za upravljanje trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov 1.
Special Report 14/2009 asked the question if the management instruments applied to the market in milk and milk products achieved their main objectives. 
Posebno poročilo št. 14/2009 je zastavilo vprašanje, ali so instrumenti za upravljanje trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov dosegli svoje glavne cilje.
‘Milk production is of major importance in the European Union’s agricultural economy. 
Mleko ima zelo pomembno mesto v kmetijskem gospodarstvu Evropske unije.
More than 1 million producers supply 148 million tonnes of milk annually with an approximate value of 41 000 million euro at the farm gate. 
Več kot milijon proizvajalcev letno zagotavlja 148 milijonov ton mleka, ki je ob odvozu s kmetij vredno 41 000 milijonov EUR.
The milk processing sector (producing mainly cheese, butter and drinking milk) employs around 400 000 people and generates a turnover of 120 000 million euro.’ 
Mlečno-predelovalna industrija (ki izdeluje predvsem sire, maslo in konzumno mleko) zaposluje približno 400 000 ljudi in ustvarja promet v višini 120 milijard EUR.
(Source: Press release ECA/09/63) 2. 
(Vir: Sporočilo za javnost ECA/09/63.) 2.
In this special report the European Court of Auditors reviews how effectively the European Commission managed the market for milk and milk products since the introduction of milk quotas in 1984, with reference to the main objectives of EU dairy policy. 
V tem posebnem poročilu je Evropsko računsko sodišče pregledovalo, kako uspešno je Komisija upravljala trg mleka in mlečnih izdelkov po uvedbi mlečnih kvot leta 1984 glede na glavne cilje mlečne politike EU.
We also highlight the most critical issues to be considered in the progressive deregulation of the milk sector, which was started in 2003. 3. 
Sodišče je tudi opozorilo na najbolj kritična vprašanja, ki jih je treba upoštevati v procesu liberalizacije trga mleka, ki se je začela leta 2003. 3.
The EU’s milk policy was designed to meet a complex range of objectives, in particular: (a) to reach a situation of market equilibrium, (b) to stabilise the prices of milk and milk products, (c) to ensure a fair standard of living for producers and (d) to improve competitiveness. 
Mlečna politika EU je bila oblikovana, da bi uresničila kompleksen nabor ciljev, med katerimi so predvsem: (a) uravnovesiti trg, (b) stabilizirati cene mleka in mlečnih izdelkov, (c) zagotoviti primeren življenjski standard proizvajalcem in (d) izboljšati konkurenčnost.
Annexes 22 The Court’s recommendations Recommendation Implementation status The Court’s assessment (1) The Commission must continue to supervise the development of the market in milk and milk products by implementing the measures required to make sure deregulation of the sector does not lead to the recurrence of overproduction. 
Priloge 22 Priporočila Sodišča Priporočilo Stanje izvedbe Ocena Sodišča (1) Komisija mora še naprej nadzirati gibanje trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov z izvajanjem potrebnih ukrepov, da deregulacija sektorja ne bo povzročila ponovne prekomerne proizvodnje.
Failing this the Commission’s objective of keeping to a minimum level of regulation, of the safety net type, might rapidly prove impossible to fulfil. Fully implemented The deregulation of the market and the market-oriented approach pursued by the Commission has enabled EU milk production to better respond to demand on the market, and thereby contributed to Commission’s objective to stabilise the milk and milk products market, and to avoid recurrence of overproduction, especially of a permanent structural, subsidised overproduction. 
Če ji to ne bo uspelo, se lahko njen cilj, da vztraja pri najnižji možni stopnji regulacije, kot je varnostna mreža, hitro izkaže za neuresničljivega. izvedeno v celoti Deregulacija trga in tržno usmerjen pristop, za katerega si prizadeva Komisija, sta omogočila, da se proizvodnja mleka v EU bolje odziva na povpraševanje na trgu, in tako prispevala k cilju Komisije o stabilizaciji trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov ter preprečitvi ponovne prekomerne proizvodnje, zlasti stalne strukturne subvencionirane prekomerne proizvodnje.
(2) While acknowledging that price formation in the food sector is particularly complex, the Court considers that it must be subject to regular monitoring by the Commission. 
(2) Čeprav Sodišče priznava, da je proces oblikovanja cen na živilskem področju še posebej zapleten, meni, da ga mora Komisija redno spremljati.
The Commission and the Member States must ensure that the concentration of processing and distribution companies does not reduce milk producers to mere price-takers and does not restrict the final consumer’s possibility of enjoying an equitable share of price reductions. 
Komisija in države članice morajo poskrbeti za to, da koncentracija predelovalnih in distribucijskih podjetij ne bo postavila proizvajalcev mleka v položaj, kjer ne bodo imeli vpliva na ceno in bodo cene lahko samo sprejemali (price-takers), ter da ne bo omejila možnosti končnih potrošnikov, da so enakopravno deležni cenovnih znižanj. večinoma izvedeno Kar zadeva spremljanje, je pred kratkim ustanovljeni observatorij za trg mleka izčrpen, zlahka dostopen in koristen vir podatkov o sektorju mleka, ki ga lahko vsi deležniki uporabijo za spremljanje, analiziranje in potencialne tržne intervencije.
Milk producers were provided with a toolbox of measures (for example, creating producer organisations) to strengthen their position in milk supply’s chain to have a stronger impact on the producer prices. 
Proizvajalcem mleka je bil zagotovljen sveženj ukrepov (na primer ustanavljanje organizacij proizvajalcev), ki naj bi položaj proizvajalcev v verigi preskrbe z mlekom okrepil tako, da bi imeli močnejši vpliv na proizvodne cene.
The first positive examples of making use of these opportunities have already been noted (e.g. in the ‘Milk Package’ implementation’s report). 
Prvi pozitivni primeri uporabe teh priložnosti so že bili opaženi (npr. v poročilu o izvajanju svežnja ukrepov za mleko).
However, we believe that the Commission could be more active in promoting the measures included in the ‘Milk Package’ oriented at reinforcing the milk producers’ position in the milk supply chain, as current use of these measures remains limited. 
Vendar Sodišče meni, da bi lahko Komisija dejavneje spodbujala ukrepe iz svežnja, ki so usmerjeni v krepitev položaja proizvajalcev mleka v verigi preskrbe z mlekom, saj njihova sedanja uporaba ostaja omejena.
Another problem concerns the very limited influence that the Commission has on the consumer prices, due to a number of reasons such as the policy of market orientation, the complexity of the pricing in the sector, in particular dairy products and limited price transmission between milk producer price and dairy products consumer prices. 
Še en problem je zelo omejen vpliv Komisije na porabniške cene zaradi številnih razlogov, kot so politika tržne usmerjenosti, zapletenost določanja cen v sektorju, zlasti za mlečne izdelke, in omejen prenos cen med proizvodno ceno mleka in porabniškimi cenami mlečnih izdelkov.
(3) As far as the dairy sector is concerned, in practice both the former policy of price support and the current policy of direct income support lack regional and social focus. 
(3) Kar zadeva sektor mleka, sta tako prejšnja politika podpore s cenami kot sedanja politika neposredne dohodkovne pomoči v praksi brez natančne ozemeljske ali socialne usmeritve.
In view of the importance of milk production in the agricultural economy and its impact on the management of the countryside, the Court recommends that the Commission should intensify its reflection on the strategies to be applied to tackle: ο the specific problems of the regions in which milk production is, more vulnerable, in particular in mountainous areas; ο the environmental consequences of the geographical concentration of milk production. 
Glede na pomen proizvodnje mleka v kmetijstvu in njen vpliv na upravljanje podeželja Sodišče Komisiji priporoča, da temeljito razmisli o strategijah, ki bi jih bilo treba uvesti za učinkovito reševanje: ο posebnih težav regij, v katerih je proizvodnja mleka najbolj ranljiva, zlasti gorskih območij; ο okoljskih posledic geografske koncentracije proizvodnje mleka. večinoma izvedeno Komisija se je od Posebnega poročila št.
Implemented in most respects The Commission has focused on disadvantaged areas in agriculture and environmental aspects of the agricultural policy since the Court’s SR14/2009. 
14/2009, ki ga je izdalo Sodišče, osredotočala na prikrajšana območja na področju kmetijstva in okoljske vidike kmetijske politike.
The EU legislative framework containing ‘a toolbox’ of legislative instruments for the Member States (MS) was maintained and developed (notably ‘greening component’) by the Commission. 
Ohranjala in razvijala je zakonodajni okvir EU (zlasti oze-lenitveno komponento), ki vsebuje sveženj zakonodajnih instrumentov za države članice.
However, taking into account (a) a great number of dairy farms located in disadvantaged areas and possible serious unwanted consequences of the current and future structural adjustments in the sector, and (b) that the Commission left it to the discretion of MS to use the toolbox measures, we found that the risks identified in paragraph 69 of SR 14/2009 remain and the current policy framework might not suffice to maintain production in disadvantaged areas. 
Toda ob upoštevanju (a) velikega števila mlečnih kmetij na prikrajšanih območjih in morebitnih resnih nezaželenih posledic sedanjih in prihodnjih strukturnih prilagoditev v sektorju ter (b) tega, da je Komisija uporabo ukrepov iz svežnja prepustila presoji držav članic, je Sodišče ugotovilo, da tveganja iz odstavka 69 Posebnega poročila št. 14/2009 še vedno obstajajo in da sedanji okvir politike morda ne bo zadoščal za ohranjanje proizvodnje na prikrajšanih območjih.
(4) For the European milk sector, the world market will remain a secondary market to which it will only have access during periods when world prices are high. 
(4) Svetovni trg bo za evropski sektor mleka ostal drugotnega pomena, saj bo nanj lahko dostopal samo v obdobjih visokih svetovnih cen.
Only producers of cheeses and other products with high added value will be able to claim sustainable market shares. 
Trajne tržne deleže si bodo lahko pridobili samo proizvajalci sirov in drugih izdelkov z visoko dodano vrednostjo.
It is therefore indispensable for the Commission and the Member States to pursue their efforts to bring about a reorientation of milk production, primarily towards satisfying the needs of the European domestic market and also towards the production of cheeses and other products of high added value which can be exported without budgetary assistance. 
Zato si morajo Komisija in države članice nujno še naprej prizadevati, da proizvodnjo mleka prednostno usmerijo v zadovoljevanje potreb domačega evropskega trga, poleg tega pa še v proizvodnjo sira in drugih izdelkov z visoko dodano vrednostjo, ki jih je moč izvažati brez proračunske pomoči. izvedeno v celoti Zaradi rastočega povpraševanja na svetovnem trgu in prizadevanja za tržno usmerjene politike je EU v času od objave Posebnega poročila št.
Fully implemented Since SR 14/2009, as a result of growing world market demand and the EU’s pursuit of market orientation policies, the EU has in the meantime become one of the world’s leading exporters of milk products without export refunds. 
14/2009 postala ena od vodilnih izvoznic mlečnih izdelkov brez izvoznih nadomestil.
Annexes 23 Agriculture: reform of the sugar market 1. 
Priloge 23 Kmetijstvo: reforma trga sladkorja 1.
Special Report 6/2010 concerned the reform of the sugar market. 
6/2010 je zadevalo reformo trga sladkorja.
‘The EU launched a major reform of its sugar sector in 2006 in order to increase market orientation and to stabilise the market while complying with international commitments. 
Leta 2006 je EU uvedla pomembno reformo v sektorju sladkorja, da bi ob izpolnjevanju mednarodnih zavez zagotovila njegovo konkurenčnost in stabilizirala trg.
The European Court of Auditors has conducted an audit of the reform and concludes that, whereas the aim was to create an incentive for the least competitive sugar producers to give up their quotas, quotas were also abandoned by competitive factories. 
Evropsko računsko sodišče je revidiralo reformo in prišlo do zaključka, da so kvote opuščale tudi konkurenčne tovarne, čeprav je bil prvotno cilj, da se k odpovedi kvotam spodbudi najmanj konkurenčne proizvajalce sladkorja.
There is an increased dependence on imports while there are doubts as to whether the fall in prices will be passed on to final consumers and delays persist in implementing diversification and environmental measures. 
Odvisnost od uvoza se je povečala in obstaja dvom o tem, da imajo od znižanja cen korist končni potrošniki, poleg tega pa se še vedno zamuja pri izvajanju diverzifikacije in okoljskih ukrepov.
The Court also notes the increasing risk of displacement of production facilities. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da se povečuje tveganje preselitve proizvodnih zmogljivosti.
The sugar reform involved a price decrease as well as a 30 % reduction in production quotas, resulting in the closure of 80 factories. 
Reforma trga sladkorja je pomenila znižanje cen in 30-odstotno zmanjšanje kvot za proizvodnjo, zaradi česar je bilo zaprtih 80 tovarn.
A restructuring fund and aid for diversification were intended to mitigate the social and economic impact of these measures. 
Sklad za prestrukturiranje in pomoč za diverzifikacijo naj bi omilila socialni in ekonomski učinek teh ukrepov.
The Court’s audit assessed the extent to which the objectives of the reform have been achieved to date.’ 
Sodišče je ocenilo, v kolikšnem obsegu so bili doslej doseženi cilji reforme.
(Source: Press release ECA/10/30). 
(Vir: Sporočilo za javnost ECA/10/30.)
The Court’s recommendations 2. 
Priporočila Sodišča 2.
The Court issued two recommendations to ensure competitiveness, another two to stabilise markets and guarantee the availability of supplies, and the last two to address and alleviate adaptation problems. 
Sodišče je izreklo dve priporočili o zagotavljanju konkurenčnosti, še dve o stabilizaciji trgov in zagotavljanju redne preskrbe ter dve o obravnavanju in lajšanju težav pri prilagajanju.
Annexes 24 Recommendation Implementation status The Court’s assessment (1) The prevailing external pressures may require the Commission to propose further adjustments of internal production. 
Priloge 24 Priporočilo Stanje izvedbe Ocena Sodišča (1) Komisija bo zaradi zunanjih pritiskov morda morala predlagati nadaljnje prilagoditve domače proizvodnje.
In such a case, the Court recommends that instruments and measures should be designed so as to ensure overall consistency and be based on thorough technical assessments of needs and objective and non-discriminatory criteria. No longer relevant Recommendation 1 required further adjustments of internal production proposed by the Commission, due to external pressures. After the reform however, the Commission proposed no significant further adjustments of internal production and quota. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj v tem primeru instrumente in ukrepe načrtuje tako, da bodo zagotavljali splošno doslednost in temeljili na podrobnih tehničnih ocenah potreb ter objektivnih in nediskriminatornih merilih. ni več relevantno Priporočilo 1 je zahtevalo, da Komisija predlaga dodatne prilagoditve domače proizvodnje zaradi zunanjih pritiskov, toda ta ni po reformi predlagala nobenih bistvenih prilagoditev domače proizvodnje in kvot.
However, the recommendation will be no longer relevant with the ending of sugar-quota regime in 2017. 
Vendar pa priporočilo po koncu ureditve kvot za sladkor leta 2017 ne bo več relevantno.
(2) In view of the importance of sugar production in the agricultural economy, the Court recommends that the Commission proposes measures to remove the rigidities and constraints in the current quota system which affect adversely the competitiveness of growers and producers. Fully implemented The Commission’s proposal in 2011 to end the quota system and all its rigidities and constraints was approved. 
(2) Zaradi pomembnosti proizvodnje sladkorja v kmetijstvu Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija predlaga ukrepe za odstranitev togosti in omejitev v sedanjem sistemu kvot, ki negativno vplivajo na konkurenčnost pridelovalcev in proizvajalcev. izvedeno v celoti Predlog Komisije iz leta 2011 o koncu sistema kvot z vsemi njegovimi togostmi in omejitvami je bil odobren.
(3) The Court recommends that possible future decisions which impact EU sugar production take into account the level of internal sugar production which is considered necessary given the Treaty objective of assuring availability of supply. 
(3) Sodišče priporoča, naj se pri morebitnih odločitvah v prihodnosti, ki bodo vplivale na proizvodnjo sladkorja v EU, upošteva raven domače proizvodnje sladkorja, ki se zdi potrebna glede na cilj iz Pogodbe o zagotavljanju redne preskrbe. večinoma izvedeno Uredba (EU) št.
Implemented in most respects Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 gives the Commission the legislative authority and tools to intervene in the market in case of over-or under-supply of sugar. 
1308/2013 daje Komisiji zakonodajna pooblastila in orodja za intervencije na trgu v primeru prekomerne ali premajhne preskrbe s sladkorjem.
Recent reports provide evidence that the Commission regularly monitors sugar production and consumption, imports and exports, and opening and closing sugar stocks in order to ensure availability of sugar supply on the EU market in accordance with the Treaty objectives. 
Nedavna poročila zagotavljajo dokaze, da Komisija redno spremlja proizvodnjo in porabo sladkorja, uvoz in izvoz ter začetne in končne zaloge sladkorja, da bi zagotovila razpoložljivost preskrbe s sladkorjem na trgu EU v skladu s cilji iz Pogodbe.
However, significant EU reliance on sugar imports was identified as the main factor that may affect the availability of sugar supply and EU market stability. 
Toda ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bistveno zanašanje EU na uvoz sladkorja glavni dejavnik, ki lahko vpliva na razpoložljivost preskrbe s sladkorjem in stabilnost trga EU.
Today, the EU continues to be a net importer and produces around 83 %-88 % of the EU consumption. 
Ta je zdaj še vedno neto uvoznica in proizvaja 83 %–88 % sladkorja, ki se v njej porabi.
(4) While acknowledging that price formation in the food sector is particularly complex, the Court considers that it must be subject to regular monitoring by the Commission. 
(4) Čeprav Sodišče priznava, da je proces oblikovanja cen na živilskem področju še posebej zapleten, meni, da ga mora Komisija redno spremljati.
The Commission and the Member States must ensure that competition law is correctly enforced in the sector thus ensuring the Treaty objective that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices. 
Komisija in države članice morajo zagotoviti pravilno izvajanje konkurenčnega prava v sektorju in s tem doseganje cilja iz Pogodbe, da je preskrba potrošnikom dostopna po primernih cenah. večinoma izvedeno Komisija mesečno spremlja cene sladkorja.
There are no apparent issues regarding the reasonableness of sugar prices or availability of supply. 
Ni očitnih vprašanj v zvezi z razumnostjo cen sladkorja ali razpoložljivostjo preskrbe.
The Commission also launched a study on price transmission in the sugar market. 
Komisija je tudi sprožila študijo o prenosu cen na trgu sladkorja.