natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This public funding can be com‐ plemented by private funding (e.g. investments by companies on appren‐ ticeships schemes or training schemes financed by private foundations). 
To javno financiranje lahko dopolnjuje še zasebno financiranje (npr. naložbe podjetij v vajeniške programe ali pro‐ grami usposabljanja, ki jih financirajo zasebne ustanove).
Overview of the funding of the Youth Guarantee National Funding Funding sources European Social Fund (ESF) Youth Guarantee Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) Source: ECA. 
Pregled financiranja jamstva za mlade Nacionalno financiranje Viri financiranja Evropski socialni sklad (ESS) Jamstvo za mlade Pobuda za zaposlovanje mladih (PZM) Kakovostne ponudbe za: zaposlitev – nadaljnje izobraževanje – vajeništvo – pripravništvo Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Good-quality offers for: Employment - Continued Education - Apprenticeship - Traineeship 13 European Council conclusions, 8 February 2013, EUCO 37/13 (http://www.consilium. europa.eu). 
13 Sklepi Evropskega sveta z dne 8. februarja 2013, EUCO 37/13 (http://www.consilium. europa.eu).
Introduction 14 European Social Fund 15 The ESF is by far the most important source of EU funding for the Youth Guarantee scheme. 
Uvod 14 Evropski socialni sklad 15 ESS je daleč najpomembnejši vir financiranja EU za program jamstva za mlade.
In February 2015, the Commission estimated that the ESF funding will total around 9.5 bil‐ lion euro including the 3.2 billion euro required to match the YEI funding, where appropriate (see paragraph 16). 
Februarja 2015 je Komisija ocenila, da bo financiranje iz ESS sku‐ paj znašalo približno 9,5 milijarde EUR, vključno s 3,2 milijarde EUR, ki je pot‐ rebna za dopolnitev financiranja PZM, kadar je to primerno (glej odstavek 16).
The ESF can finance measures specif‐ ically targeting individuals as well as those relating to structural reforms (see Box 3). 
ESS lahko financira ukrepe, ki so po‐ sebej usmerjeni na posameznike, kot tudi tiste, ki se nanašajo na strukturne reforme (glej okvir 3).
Examples of activities that can be supported by the ESF Examples of activities that can be supported by the ESF include: development of specialised youth services, set‐up of one‐stop‐shops (e.g. within Public Employment Services (PES) and on the Internet), enhanced data‐ bases, support to employment and schools careers services, awareness‐raising campaigns, support to volun‐ tary organisations providing mentors, setting up centres for analysis and developing policy models. 
Primeri dejavnosti, ki jih lahko podpira ESS Primeri dejavnosti, ki jih lahko podpira ESS, zajemajo razvoj specializiranih služb za mlade, vzpostavitev sis‐ tema „vse na enem mestu” (npr. v javnih službah za zaposlovanje in na spletu), izboljšane podatkovne zbirke, podporo službam za zaposlovanje in šolsko poklicno svetovanje, kampanje za ozaveščanje, podporo prosto‐ voljnim organizacijam, ki zagotavljajo mentorje, ustanovitev centrov za analizo in razvijanje modelov politik.
Youth Employment Initiative 16 To top up available EU financial sup‐ port to the regions where individuals struggle most with youth unemploy‐ ment and inactivity, the Council and the European Parliament agreed to create a dedicated 6.4 billion euro Youth Employment Initiative (YEI). 
Pobuda za zaposlovanje mladih 16 Kot dodatek k razpoložljivi finanč‐ ni podpori EU za regije, kjer imajo posamezniki največ težav z brezposel‐ nostjo mladih in neaktivnostjo, sta se Svet in Evropski parlament dogovorila o vzpostavitvi posebne pobude za zaposlovanje mladih (PZM) s 6,4 mi‐ lijarde EUR.
The YEI funding comprises 3.2 billion euro from a specific new EU budget line dedicated to youth employment which is to be matched by at least 3.2 bil‐ lion euro from national allocations under the existing ESF. 
Financiranje PZM zajema 3,2 milijarde EUR iz nove posebne vrstice v proračunu EU za zaposlovanje mladih,ki se jim mora pridružiti vsaj 3,2 milijarde EUR iz nacionalnih dodeli‐ tev v okviru obstoječega ESS.
Unlike the ESF part, the specific allocation for YEI is not subject to the national co‐financing requirement14 and costs incurred by Member States since 1 September 2013 are eligible for reimbursement on a retrospective ba‐ sis. 
Za razliko od ESS za posebno dodelitev PZM ne velja zahteva o nacionalnem sofinanciranju14, stroški, ki so v državah članicah nastali po 1. septembru 2013, pa so upravičeni do povračila za nazaj.
The total YEI funding is front‐load‐ ed so that these funds are available in 2014 and 2015 and the related expen‐ diture is due to be incurred by the end of 2017 and 2018. 
Skupno financiranje PZM je okrepljeno v začetni fazi, tako da so ta sredstva na voljo v letih 2014 in 2015, s tem pove‐ zani odhodki pa naj bi nastali do konca let 2017 in 2018.
14 Article 22(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Social Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
14 Člen 22(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1304/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o Evropskem socialnem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
Box 3 Introduction 15 17 The YEI is part of the overall ESF pro‐ gramming and approved either in spe‐ cific YEI operational programmes or as part of ESF operational programmes as a priority axis or even as part of a priority axis15. 
Uvod 15 17 PZM je vključena v skupno programsko načrtovanje ESS, odobri pa se v okviru posebnih operativnih programov PZM ali kot del operativnih programov ESS v obliki prednostne osi ali celo dela prednostne osi15.
18 YEI support concentrates on regions experiencing youth unemployment rates above 25 % and on young people not in employment, education or train‐ ing (NEETs). 
18 Podpora PZM je osredotočena na regije, v katerih stopnja brezposelnosti mladih presega 25 %, in na mlade, ki niso zaposleni, se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo (NEET).
It funds activities directly targeting young people under the age of 25 or, where the Member States consider it to be relevant, under the age of 3016 (see Box 4). 
Financira dejav‐ nosti, ki so neposredno namenjene mladim v starosti do 25 let ali, kadar države članice menijo, da je ustrezno, do 30 let16 (glej okvir 4).
19 Twenty Member States are eligible for YEI funding (see Figure 3 and Annex II), as they had regions where youth unemployment was over 25 % in 201217. 
19 Do financiranja PZM je upravičenih 20 držav članic (glej sliko 3 in Prilogo II), ker so bile v njih leta 2012 regije, kjer je bila brezposelnost mladih višja od 25 %17.
20 In 2014, the Commission stated that in order to make the Youth Guarantee a reality, Member States also need to prioritise youth employment measures in their national budgets18. 
20 Komisija je leta 2014 navedla, da mo‐ rajo za uresničitev jamstva za mlade tudi države članice v svojih nacionalnih proračunih nameniti prednost ukre‐ pom za zaposlovanje18.
15 Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013. 
15 Člen 18 Uredbe (EU) št.
16 Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 and Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) 1303/2013. 
1304/2013 in Priloga VIII k Uredbi (EU) št. 1303/2013.
17 Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013. 
17 Člen 16 Uredbe (EU) št.
18 European Commission MEMO ‘The EU Youth Guarantee’, 8 October 2014. 
18 Evropska Komisija, MEMO „The EU Youth Guarantee”, 8. oktober 2014.
Examples of activities that can be supported by YEI Measures that can be financed through the YEI are, for example: provision of first job experience, job coaching for individuals, mobility measures to bring skills and jobs together, start‐up support for young entrepreneurs, direct support for traineeships and apprenticeships, and provision of digital skills training. 
Primeri dejavnosti, ki jih lahko podpira PZM Ukrepi, ki jih je mogoče financirati v okviru PZM, so na primer zagotavljanje prvih delovnih izkušenj, usposa‐ bljanje za delo za posameznike, ukrepi za mobilnost, da bi znanja in spretnosti pripeljali na isti kraj z delov‐ nimi mesti, zagonska podpora za mlade podjetnike, neposredna podpora za pripravništvo in vajeništvo ter zagotavljanje usposabljanja za znanje in spretnosti z digitalnega področja.
Introduction 17 Role of the Commission in the set‐up, implementation and monitoring of the Youth Guarantee 21 The Commission’s role in relation to the set‐up, implementation and mon‐ itoring of the Youth Guarantee was specifically defined in the April 2013 Council recommendation19. 
Uvod 17 Vloga Komisije pri vzpostavljanju, izvajanju in spremljanju jamstva za mlade 21 Vloga Komisije pri vzpostavljanju, izvajanju in spremljanju jamstva za mlade je bila izrecno določena v pripo‐ ročilu Sveta iz aprila 201319.
In particu‐ lar, the Commission should: — encourage Member States to make best use of the ESF, in accordance with the relevant ESF investment priorities for the 2014–20 program‐ ming period, and the YEI, where applicable, to support the set‐up and implementation of Youth Guarantee schemes as a policy instrument for combating and preventing youth unemployment and social exclusion; — monitor the design, implementa‐ tion and results of the Youth Guar‐ antee schemes, in the context of the multilateral surveillance of the Employment Committee (see para‐ graph 68) within the framework of the European Semester and as part of the annual work programme of the European Network of Public Employment Services, analyse the impact of the policies in place, and address, where appropriate, country‐specific recommendations to Member States, on the basis of the guidelines for the Member States’ employment policies. 
Komisija bi morala zlasti: – spodbujati države članice, da kar najbolje izkoristijo ESS, in sicer v skladu z ustreznimi prednostnimi investicijami ESS za programsko obdobje 2014–2020, ter PZM, kadar je ustrezno, v podporo vzpostavitvi in izvajanju programov jamstva za mlade kot instrumenta politike za odpravljanje in preprečevanje brezposelnosti mladih in socialne izključenosti; – spremljati oblikovanje, izvajanje in rezultate programov jamstva za mlade prek večstranskega nadzora, ki ga zagotavlja Odbor za zaposlo‐ vanje (glej odstavek 68), v okviru evropskega semestra in kot del letnega programa dela evropske mreže javnih služb za zaposlo‐ vanje, analizirati učinek spreje‐ tih politik in po potrebi izdajati priporočila posameznim državam članicam na podlagi smernic za politike držav članic na področju zaposlovanja.
22 According to the Council recom‐ mendation, in line with the 2014–20 common provisions regulation the Commission and the Member States are to ensure the effectiveness of ESF and YEI funds during preparation and implementation through monitoring, reporting and evaluation20. 
22 Po priporočilu Sveta in v skladu z ured‐ bo o skupnih določbah za obdob‐ je 2014–2020 morajo Komisija in države članice med pripravo in izvajanjem zagotoviti uspešnost porabe sredstev ESS in PZM s spremljanjem, poroča‐ njem in vrednotenjem20.
The Commission’s assessment of the Youth Guarantee implementation plans 23 Following the June 2013 Commission Communication ‘Call to Action on Youth Unemployment’21 and the Euro‐ pean Council meeting22, the Member States committed themselves to sub‐ mitting a Youth Guarantee Implemen‐ tation Plan (YGIP) to the Commission. 
Ocena izvedbenih načrtov za jamstvo za mlade, ki jo je pripravila Komisija 23 Na podlagi sporočila Komisije iz juni‐ ja 2013 z naslovom Poziv k ukrepanju v zvezi z brezposelnostjo mladih21 in zasedanja Evropskega sveta22 so se dr‐ žave članice zavezale, da bodo Komisiji predložile izvedbene načrte za jamstvo za mlade (INJM).
The eligible YEI Member States were to send these documents by the end of 2013 and the others in 2014. 
Države članice, upra‐ vičene do PZM, naj bi te dokumente poslale do konca leta 2013, druge pa leta 2014.
Within the framework of the European Semester, the Commission’s Directorate‐General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion was entrusted with assessing the available Member States’ YGIPs in January 2014 so that feedback could be provided to Member States during the European Semester bilateral meet‐ ings in February 2014. 
V okviru evropskega seme‐ stra je bila Generalnemu direktoratu za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje Komisije zaupana naloga, da januarja 2014 oceni razpoložljive INJM držav članic, da bi bilo mogoče februarja 2014 državam članicam na dvostranskih srečanjih v okviru evrop‐ skega semestra zagotoviti povratne informacije.
19 Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guarantee. 
19 Priporočilo z dne 22. aprila 2013 o vzpostavitvi jamstva za mladino.
20 Article 4.9 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
20 Člen 4(9) Uredbe (EU) št.
21 COM(2013) 447 final of 19 June 2013. 
21 COM(2013) 447 final z dne 19. junija 2013.
22 European Council Conclusions, 27–28 June 2013, EUCO 104/2/13 (http://www. consilium.europa.eu). 
22 Sklepi Evropskega Sveta z dne 27. in 28. junija 2013, EUCO 104/2/13 (http://www. consilium.europa.eu).
Audit scope and 18 approach 24 Through this audit, the Court assessed whether the Commission provided appropriate support to Member States in setting up the Youth Guarantee scheme and reviewed possible imple‐ mentation risks. 
Obseg revizije 18 in revizijski pristop 24 Sodišče je s to revizijo ocenilo, ali je Komisija zagotovila ustrezno podporo državam članicam pri vzpostavljanju programa jamstva za mlade, ter pregle‐ dalo mogoča tveganja pri izvajanju.
25 The audit covered the period from the adoption of the Council Recommenda‐ tion in April 2013 to June 2014. At this date, the design phase of the Youth Guarantee scheme was complete, including the submission of YGIPs by Member States and their subse‐ quent assessment by the Commission. 
25 Revizija je zajela obdobje od spreje‐ tja priporočila Sveta aprila 2013 do junija 2014, ko je bila faza oblikovanja programa jamstva za mlade kon‐ čana, vključno s predložitvijo INJM s strani držav članic in ocenjevanjem teh načrtov, ki ga je izvedla Komisi‐ ja.
Moreover, some additional informa‐ tion provided by the Commission up until February 2015 (concerning, in particular, the estimated EU funding allocated to the Youth Guarantee and the development of the monitoring system) has been taken into account by the Court. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče upoštevalo nekatere dodatne informacije, ki jih je do februarja 2015 zagotovila Komisija (predvsem o ocenjenem financiranju EU, dodeljenemu jamstvu za mlade, in razvoju sistema za spremljanje).
The audit aimed to iden‐ tify potential risks which could have an impact on the implementation of the scheme. 
Namen revizije je bil ugotoviti more‐ bitna tveganja, ki bi lahko vplivala na izvajanje programa.
The Court intends to also cover issues concerning youth employ‐ ment, including the implementation of EU initiatives at Member State level, in future reports. 
Sodišče namerava zajeti vprašanja glede zaposlovanja mladih, vključno z izvajanjem pobud EU na ravni držav članic, tudi v prihod‐ nja poročila.
26 The audit focused on the Commission’s assessment of the YGIPs for a sample of five Member States: Ireland, Italy, Lithuania and Portugal, which were also subject to the Youth Action Teams (YAT), and France. 
26 Revizija je bila osredotočena na oceno, ki jo je Komisija opravila za vzorec INJM petih držav članic: Irske, Itali‐ je, Litve in Portugalske, kjer so bile ocenjene tudi skupine za ukrepanje na področju zaposlovanja mladih, ter Francije.
For these five Mem‐ ber States, the Court re‐performed the Commission’s assessment and analysed both the feedback that the Commission provided to the Member States and the subsequent follow‐up. 
Sodišče je za teh pet držav članic ponovno izvedlo ocenjevanje, ki ga je opravila Komisija, ter analiziralo povratne informacije, ki jih je Komi‐ sija zagotovila državam članicam, in nadaljnje ukrepanje na njihovi podlagi.
The Court also examined, for the Member States for which the informa‐ tion was available, the link between the assessment of the YGIPs and the assessment of the YEI‐related ex ante conditionalities. 
Za države članice, za katere so bile na voljo informacije, je tudi preučilo povezavo med oceno INJM in oceno predhodnih pogojenosti, povezanih s PZM.
Finally, the Court assessed the EU framework for mon‐ itoring progress towards an effective implementation of the Youth Guaran‐ tee scheme and related reporting. 
Sodišče je še ocenilo okvir EU za spremljanje napredka pri uspešnem izvajanju programa jamstva za mlade in poročanju o tem.
Observations 19 The Commission provided adequate and timely support to the Member States in setting up the Youth Guarantee Scheme 27 Implementing the Youth Guarantee requires in‐depth structural reforms of training, job search and education sys‐ tems to improve school‐to‐work tran‐ sitions and the employability of young people. 
27 Izvajanje jamstva za mlade zahte‐ va poglobljene strukturne reforme sistemov usposabljanja, iskanja zaposlitve in izobraževanja, da bi se izboljšala prehod iz šolanja v zaposli‐ tev in zaposljivost mladih.
In addition to these structural reforms, the Youth Guarantee also encourages the use of a wide range of proactive measures to help boost demand for young people’s labour. 
Poleg teh strukturnih reform jamstvo za mlade spodbuja tudi uporabo najrazličnejših proaktivnih ukrepov, ki naj bi pripo‐ mogli k povečanju povpraševanja po delu mladih.
These measures (such as temporary and well‐targeted wage or recruitment subsidies or apprenticeship and train‐ eeship grants) can help young people enter the job market and further devel‐ op their skills. 
Ti ukrepi (kot so začasne in dobro ciljno usmerjene subvencije plač ali zaposlovanja ali nepovratna sredstva za vajeništvo in pripravništvo) lahko mladim pomagajo pri vstopu na trg dela in nadaljnjem razvijanju njiho‐ vega znanja in spretnosti.
28 The Council recommendation provides good practice guidance for setting up an effective Youth Guarantee scheme. 
28 Priporočilo Sveta vsebuje smernice o dobri praksi pri vzpostavljanju uspe‐ šnega programa jamstva za mlade.
The Court examined to what extent the Commission has included these good practice criteria in its assessment of the Youth Guarantee Implemen‐ tation Plans (YGIPs). 
So‐ dišče je preučilo, v kolikšnem obsegu je Komisija v svojo oceno INJM vključila ta merila dobre prakse.
Furthermore the Court assessed to what extent the Member States took account of the Commission’s analysis of the draft YGIPs and whether the Commission’s assessment of YGIPs was well coordi‐ nated with its ex ante assessment of ESF/YEI OPs. 
Ocenilo je tudi, v kakšnem obsegu so države članice upoštevale analizo, ki jo je Komisija opravila za osnutke INJM, ter ali je bila ta ocena Komisije dobro usklajena z njeno predhodno oceno operativnih programov ESS/PZM.
Observations 20 30 In addition, the Commission sup‐ ported Member States by publishing ‘frequently asked questions’ in De‐ cember 2013 on the website dedicated to the Youth Guarantee and various supporting documents, such as a staff working document which details the basic concept of the Youth Guarantee and the principles that could contrib‐ ute to its success. 
Opažanja 20 30 Komisija je tudi podprla države članice z objavo odgovorov na pogosto zas‐ tavljena vprašanja decembra 2013 na spletni strani, namenjeni jamstvu za mlade, in spremnimi dokumenti, kot je delovni dokument služb Komisije, v ka‐ terem so podrobno pojasnjeni temeljni pojem jamstva za mlade in načela, ki bi lahko prispevala k njegovemu uspehu.
Moreover, the Com‐ mission organised thematic events in October 2013 and April 2014 and succeeded in having all Member States appoint a national Youth Guarantee coordinator. 
Poleg tega je Komisija oktobra 2013 in aprila 2014 organizirala tematske prireditve in dosegla, da so vse države članice imenovale nacionalnega koor‐ dinatorja jamstva za mlade.
31 The Court therefore considers that the Commission provided timely support to Member States. 
31 Zaradi tega Sodišče meni, da je Komi‐ sija zagotovila pravočasno podporo državam članicam.
This facilitated Member States to initiate the set‐up of their national Youth Guarantee schemes and allowed them to submit their YGIPs within the short time‐ frame agreed in the June 2013 Council conclusions, that is by the end of 2013 for YEI‐eligible Member States and by spring 2014 for the remaining ones (see Annex II). 
Zato so lahko te začele vzpostavljati svoje nacional‐ ne programe jamstva za mlade in predložile svoje INJM v kratkem roku, določenem v sklepih Sveta iz juni‐ ja 2013, ki je trajal do konca leta 2013 za države članice, upravičene do PZM, in do pomladi leta 2014 za preostale (glej Prilogo II).
The Commission carried out a comprehensive and timely assessment of the draft YGIPs submitted by Member States 32 The Court notes that the responsibil‐ ity for the YGIPs rests with the Mem‐ ber States. 
Komisija je pripravila celovito in pravočasno oceno osnutkov INJM, ki so jih predložile države članice 32 Sodišče ugotavlja, da so za INJM odgo‐ vorne države članice.
The Commission’s role is to carry out a thorough, timely and consistent assessment of the draft YGIPs to identify shortcomings that may negatively affect the possibility of achieving an effective Youth Guaran‐ tee. 
Vloga Komisije je, da izvede temeljito, pravočasno in dosledno ocenjevanje osnutkov teh načrtov, da bi ugotovila pomanjklji‐ vosti, ki bi lahko negativno vplivale na možnost doseganja uspešnega jamstva za mlade.
On this basis Member States could then adjust their YGIPs accordingly. 
Na tej podlagi bi lahko nato države članice ustrezno prilagodile svoje načrte.
In particular, this would enable Member States to make best use of the ESF and the YEI, where applicable, and support the set‐up and implementation of Youth Guarantee schemes. 
Zlasti bi jim to omogočilo, da kar najbolje upora‐ bijo ESS in, kadar je ustrezno, PZM, ter podpirajo vzpostavljanje in izvajanje programov jamstva za mlade.
33 The Court has reviewed the Commis‐ sion assessment of the national YGIPs and to what extent Member States have subsequently reacted to the shortcomings identified. 
33 Sodišče je pregledalo oceno, ki jo je Komisija pripravila za nacionalne INJM, ter to, v kakšnem obsegu so se nato države članice odzvale na ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti.
Observations 21 35 As regards the Member States covered by this report, the Commission had assessed all the YGIPs reviewed by the Court and was in a position to provide feedback in time for bilateral meetings held in February 2014. 
Opažanja 21 35 Kar zadeva države članice, ki jih zajema to poročilo, je Komisija ocenila vse INJM, ki jih je pregledalo Sodišče, zato je lahko pravočasno zagotovila povratne informacije za dvostranska srečanja, ki so potekala februarja 2014.
The Commission’s assess‐ ment identified many of the shortcomings in draft YGIPs 36 The Commission assessment iden‐ tified a number of shortcomings in relation to information provided by the Member States concerning key aspects included in their national YGIPs. 
Komisija je v oceni ugoto-– vila številne pomanjkljivosti v osnutkih INJM 36 Komisija je v oceni ugotovila številne pomanjkljivosti pri informacijah, ki so jih zagotovile države članice glede ključnih vidikov svojih nacionalnih INJM.
Examples of such shortcomings include: poor or non‐existent analysis of skills mismatch, failure to set out how the planned measures will ensure that all young NEETs will be reached, and inconsistencies in what constitutes a good quality offer. 
Med primeri teh pomanjkljivosti so: ni analiz neskladij znanja in spret‐ nosti s potrebami na trgu dela ali pa so te analize slabe, ni navedeno, kako bodo načrtovani ukrepi zagotovili, da bodo doseženi vsi mladi NEET, in nedo‐ sledno je opredeljeno, kaj je kakovo‐ stna ponudba.