natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
36 Agreements in writing as a mean for implementing the European Statistical Programme are recognised in Article 14(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 and such agreements are concluded between the national statistical authorities and the Commission. 
36 Pisni sporazumi kot sredstvo za izvajanje evropskega statističnega programa so priznani v členu 14(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 223/2009, sklepajo pa se med nacionalnimi statističnimi organi in Komisijo.
The arrangements in this case predate Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 and were concluded on the basis of gentlemen’s agreements. 
Dogovori v tem primeru izhajajo iz obdobja pred Uredbo (ES) št. 223/2009 in so bili sprejeti na podlagi neformalnih dogovorov.
The Commission will take steps to formalise the operational arrangements with respect to the provision of regional EAA data. 
Komisija bo sprejela ukrepe za formaliziranje operativnih dogovorov v zvezi z zagotavljanjem podatkov regionalnih ERK.
38 The EAAs present both absolute values and indices. 
38 ERK predstavljajo absolutne vrednosti in kazalnike.
While indices are clearly meant to monitor changes over time, the absolute values can be used to compare average income levels between Member States when put in context. 
Kazalniki so jasno namenjeni spremljanju sprememb skozi čas, absolutne vrednosti pa je mogoče uporabiti za primerjavo ravni povprečnega dohodka po državah, kadar so postavljene v kontekst.
A presentation per annual work unit does not pretend to show income levels for individuals or households (and even less so the standard of living of agricultural households). 
Predstavitev po letnih delovnih enotah ne daje vtisa, da kaže ravni dohodka za posameznike ali gospodinjstva (kaj šele življenjsko raven kmetijskih gospodinjstev).
Rather, it is meant to show the impact of structural changes (i.e., the reduction in the number of agricultural jobs) on average agricultural incomes over time. 
Pokazala naj bi predvsem učinek strukturnih sprememb (tj. zmanjšanje števila delovnih mest v kmetijstvu) na povprečne kmetijske dohodke skozi čas.
Moreover, the Commission is well aware of the limitations that are — inevitably — linked to the use of indicators. 
Komisija se poleg tega dobro zaveda omejitev, ki so nujno povezane z uporabo kazalnikov.
Hence, the use of an individual indicator to assess performance or indeed the judgement of its advantages or disadvantages in isolation has only a limited value. 
Zato ima uporaba posameznega kazalnika za oceno uspešnosti izvajanja ali dejansko ločena presoja njegovih prednosti ali slabosti le omejeno vrednost.
39 According to Eurostat FSS 2010, 97 % of the agricultural holdings in the EU were managed by individual holders (see the Court’s paragraph 6), although legal entities farmed 27 % of the EU’s agricultural area. 
39 V skladu z Eurostatovim raziskovanjem strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev iz leta 2010 so 97 % kmetijskih gospodarstev v EU upravljali posamezni imetniki (glej odstavek 6 v poročilu Sodišča), medtem ko so pravne osebe kmetovale na 27 % kmetijskih površin EU.
In its description of the indicator ‘agricultural entrepreneurial income’ for the monitoring and evaluation system of the CAP, the Commission has made it very clear that this is no indicator of total income or of the disposable income of households employed in agriculture, because the latter, in addition to their purely agricultural incomes, may also have income from other sources (non-agricultural activities, remuneration, social benefits and income from property). 
Komisija je pri opisu kazalnika „podjetniški dohodek kmetijstva“ za sistem merjenja in vrednotenja SKP jasno navedla, da to ni kazalnik skupnega dohodka ali razpoložljivega dohodka gospodinjstev, dejavnih v kmetijstvu, saj imajo lahko slednja poleg izključno kmetijskih dohodkov tudi dohodke iz drugih virov (nekmetijske dejavnosti, plače, socialni prejemki in dohodek od lastnine).
In other words, agricultural entrepreneurial income must not be regarded as farmers’ income3. 
Povedano drugače, podjetniški dohodek v kmetijstvu se ne sme obravnavati kot dohodek kmetov3.
It is important to analyse available statistics in a comprehensive manner. 
Razpoložljive statistične podatke je pomembno celovito analizirati.
Information originating from the FADN can complement the information originating from the EAAs. 
Informacije iz mreže FADN lahko dopolnijo informacije iz ERK.
3 See http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2015/2015-10-01-context-indicators_en.pdf 
3 Glej http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2015/2015-10-01-context-indicators_en.pdf.
Reply of the Commission 59 41 Major developments in the FADN have also been driven by the successive reforms of the CAP. 
Odgovori Komisije 59 41 Glavne spremembe mreže FADN so temeljile tudi na zaporednih reformah SKP.
Some agri-environmental variables and a new set of subsidy variables, including greening, were added to the FADN questionnaire (Regulations (EU) No 385/2012 and (EU) 2015/220) to respond to the CAP post-2013. 
Zaradi odziva na SKP po letu 2013 so bile v vprašalnik mreže FADN dodane nekatere kmetijsko-okoljske spremenljivke in nov nabor spremenljivk v zvezi s subvencijami, vključno z zeleno komponento (Uredba (EU) št. 385/2012 in Uredba (EU) 2015/220).
Similarly, the 2008 CAP reform resulted in FADN changes in Regulation (EC) No 868/2008, the 2003 CAP reform in FADN changes in Regulation (EC) No 2253/2004, etc. 
Podobno je reforma SKP iz leta 2008 povzročila spremembe mreže FADN, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 868/2008, reforma SKP iz leta 2003 spremembe mreže FADN, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št.
42 External production factors are taken into account in other indicators, such as farm net income and farm net income per annual work unit. 
2253/2004, itd. 42 Zunanji proizvodni faktorji so upoštevani v drugih kazalnikih, kot sta neto dohodek kmetije in neto dohodek kmetije na letno delovno enoto.
A broad range of indicators derived from the FADN results can be used and adapted to specific analytical needs. 
Širok razpon kazalnikov, ki izhajajo iz rezultatov mreže FADN, je mogoče uporabiti in prilagoditi za posebne analitične potrebe.
43 The income indicator FNVA/AWU is applicable also to these farms. 
43 Kazalnik dohodka neto dodana vrednost kmetije na letno delovno enoto (NDVK/LDE) se lahko uporablja tudi za te kmetije.
It is important to stress that the FADN collects information through a complete set of individual accounting variables which allow their reaggregation following specific analytical needs. 
Pomembno je poudariti, da mreža FADN zbira informacije prek popolnega nabora posameznih računovodskih spremenljivk, ki omogočajo njihovo ponovno združevanje glede na posebne analitične potrebe.
44 Income indicators for farms organised as conventional companies can be built if needed for analytical purposes. 
44 Če so za analitične namene potrebni kazalniki dohodka za kmetije, organizirane kot običajna podjetja, jih je mogoče oblikovati.
45 Non-monetary income is not explicitly recorded in FADN data collection, but is considered in the analyses based of FADN data (for example in indicators of remuneration of family labour and farm profit). 
45 Nedenarni dohodek v podatkovni zbirki FADN ni izrecno evidentiran, je pa upoštevan v analizah na podlagi podatkov FADN (na primer v kazalnikih osebnih prejemkov družinske delovne sile in dobička kmetije).
Analysing the effect of income taxation at Member State level goes beyond the scope of the FADN. 
Analiziranje učinka obdavčitve dohodka na ravni države članice presega področje uporabe mreže FADN.
46 The latest version of the FADN farm return includes other gainful activities directly related to the holding. 
46 Najnovejša različica poročila s kmetijskega gospodarstva mreže FADN vključuje druge pridobitne dejavnosti, neposredno povezane s kmetijskim gospodarstvom.
47 If an activity is managed in separate business units than the farm belonging to the FADN sample, it does not contribute to the farm income. 
47 Če dejavnost upravljajo ločene poslovne enote, ki niso kmetija, ki je del vzorca FADN, ta dejavnost ne prispeva k dohodku kmetije.
While grey areas may exist between agricultural and non-agricultural activities, the Commission considers that additional sources of revenue which are clearly non-agricultural are of minor importance for the CAP. 
Lahko sicer obstajajo siva področja med kmetijskimi in nekmetijskimi dejavnostmi, vendar Komisija meni, da so dodatni viri prihodkov, ki so brez dvoma nekmetijski, za SKP manj pomembni.
Box 2 Since the data on other gainful activities directly related to the holding are only collected in the FADN as from the accounting year 2014 and these data are due to be delivered to the Commission by 31 December 2015 (a few months later for the United Kingdom and Germany) the assessment of the inconsistent treatment is mostly based on registration practices prior to the introduction of the new farm return. 
Okvir 2 Ker se podatki o drugih pridobitnih dejavnostih, neposredno povezanih s kmetijskim gospodarstvom, v mreži FADN zbirajo šele od obračunskega leta 2014 in morajo biti Komisiji predloženi do 31. decembra 2015 (za Združeno kraljestvo in Nemčijo nekaj mesecev pozneje), ocena nedoslednega obravnavanja večinoma temelji na praksah evidentiranja pred uvedbo novega poročila s kmetijskega gospodarstva.
All EU Member States are expected to deliver their data following harmonised rules that they have contributed to creating and voted on within the Committee for the FADN. 
Od vseh držav članic EU se pričakuje, da bodo predložile podatke v skladu z usklajenimi pravili, pri oblikovanju katerih so sodelovale in zanje glasovale v odboru za mrežo FADN.
An evaluation of the treatment of other gainful activities directly related to the farm will be only possible once all the validated 2014 data are available. 
Vrednotenje obravnavanja drugih pridobitnih dejavnosti, neposredno povezanih s kmetijo, bo mogoče šele po tem, ko bodo na voljo vsi potrjeni podatki za leto 2014.
Reply of the Commission 60 48 As explained in the FADN legislation and methodology, the different thresholds and coverages across Member States are preconditions to build the FADN sample and to obtain meaningful results, considering the scope and objectives of this survey. 
Odgovori Komisije 60 48 Kot je pojasnjeno v zakonodaji in metodologiji mreže FADN, so različni pragovi in pokritost po državah članicah eden od osnovnih pogojev za oblikovanje vzorca FADN in pridobitev koristnih rezultatov, če se upoštevajo področje uporabe in cilji te statistične raziskave.
Varied thresholds actually reflect and thus take into account the varied farm structures of particular Member States. 
Različni pragovi dejansko odražajo in s tem upoštevajo različne strukture kmetij v določenih državah članicah.
As for the coverage of the EU subsidies, the annual comparison between the total amount of direct payments granted to EU beneficiaries and the aggregate results obtained from FADN data collection present good coverage across the EU, e.g. over 90 % of coverage for decoupled direct payments. 
Kar zadeva pokritost subvencij EU, letna primerjava med skupnim zneskom neposrednih plačil, dodeljenih upravičencem v EU, in zbirnimi rezultati, pridobljenimi iz podatkovne zbirke FADN, kaže dobro pokritost po EU, npr. 90-odstotno pokritost za nevezana neposredna plačila.
This is testified by the extensive use of FADN data in impact assessments and economic analyses of the effects of the CAP subsidies on farms’ income. 
To potrjuje obsežna uporaba podatkov mreže FADN v ocenah učinka in ekonomskih analizah učinkov subvencij SKP na dohodek kmetij.
49 As FADN farms represent the largest possible share of agricultural output, agricultural area and farm labour of holdings run with market orientation, it is the income of this type of farm that the FADN aims at comparing. 
49 Ker kmetije mreže FADN predstavljajo največji možni delež kmetijske proizvodnje, kmetijskih površin in delovne sile na kmetijskih gospodarstvih s tržno usmeritvijo, je ravno dohodek te vrste kmetije tisti, ki ga želi primerjati mreža FADN.
Comparing farm income between Member States with the FADN is meaningful exactly because the different structure of farms at country level is reflected in the sample. 
Primerjava dohodka kmetij v državi članici v okviru mreže FADN je koristna ravno zato, ker se v vzorcu kaže različna struktura kmetij na ravni države.
If a farm with a standard output of 10 000 euro per year is not representative of the FADN-targeted farms in a certain Member State, there is no reason to include them in the comparison. 
Če kmetija s standardnim prihodkom 10 000 EUR na leto ni reprezentativna za ciljne kmetije mreže FADN v neki državi članici, ni nobenega razloga, da bi se vključila v primerjavo.
Thus, comparisons of average income per worker across all holdings included in the FADN can lead to misinterpretation about the income situation of farmers across Member States only if the data are not accompanied by detailed explanations on which part of the farm population is represented by the data. 
Tako lahko primerjave povprečnega dohodka na delavca po vseh kmetijskih gospodarstvih, vključenih v mrežo FADN, pripeljejo do napačne razlage dohodkovnega položaja kmetov po državah članicah le v primeru, če podatkov ne spremljajo podrobna pojasnila o tem, kateri del populacije kmetij predstavljajo podatki.
50 The FADN was set up to collect the accountancy data needed for, in particular: (a) an annual determination of incomes on agricultural holdings coming within the scope of the survey; and (b) a business analysis of agricultural holdings. 
50 Mreža FADN je bila vzpostavljena zaradi zbiranja računovodskih podatkov, ki so zlasti potrebni za: (a) letno ugotavljanje dohodkov na kmetijskih gospodarstvih, ki spadajo na področje statistične raziskave, in (b) analizo poslovanja kmetijskih gospodarstev.
It was designed neither to be representative of beneficiaries of EU support, nor to be a monitoring tool for rural development measures. 
Ni bila zasnovana niti zato, da bi reprezentativno predstavljala upravičence do podpore EU, niti zato, da bi bila orodje za spremljanje ukrepov za razvoj podeželja.
This would require an adaptation of the sample at each policy reform, thereby jeopardising data continuity and reliability. 
V ta namen bi bila potrebna prilagoditev vzorca ob vsaki reformi politike, s čimer bi bili ogroženi kontinuiteta in zanesljivost podatkov.
Nonetheless, the FADN covers more than 90 % of direct payments. 
Kljub temu pa mreža FADN pokriva več kot 90 % neposrednih plačil.
Beneficiaries not covered are mostly part-time or subsistence farmers, who fall below the respective survey thresholds and who receive only a small part of the total budget. 
Upravičenci, ki niso zajeti, so predvsem kmetje s polovičnim delovnim časom ali samooskrbni kmetje, ki so pod zadevnimi pragovi za raziskave in prejmejo le majhen del celotnega proračuna.
These beneficiaries are not likely to keep farm accounts that could be used in the FADN. 
Ne zdi se verjetno, da ti upravičenci vodijo računovodstvo kmetije, ki bi ga bilo mogoče uporabiti v mreži FADN.
Structural adjustments in the agricultural holdings of the EU have reduced the number of farms; as a result, the number of beneficiaries of direct payments has also decreased (– 12 % in the EU-15, – 7 % in the EU-N10 since 2005, – 4 % in Bulgaria and Romania since 2008). 
Zaradi strukturnih prilagoditev na kmetijskih gospodarstvih EU se je število kmetij zmanjšalo; posledično se je zmanjšalo tudi število upravičencev do neposrednih plačil (– 12 % v EU-15, – 7 % v EU-N10 od leta 2005, – 4 % v Bolgariji in Romuniji od leta 2008).
A smaller share of beneficiaries receives low amounts of direct payments and thus a higher average amount is granted per beneficiary, particularly in the Member States which joined the EU in 2004 and 2007. 
Manjši delež upravičencev prejema nizke zneske neposrednih plačil, zato je na upravičenca dodeljen višji povprečni znesek, zlasti v državah članicah, ki so se EU pridružile v letih 2004 in 2007.
51 The Commission and the Member States are already working together to allow information on EU income support to be combined with data on agricultural structures and land use. 
51 Komisija in države članice že sodelujejo, da bi omogočile združevanje informacij o dohodkovni podpori EU ter podatkov o kmetijskih strukturah in rabi zemljišč.
A task force on linkages between administrative data sources, statistics and the FADN was launched in 2012. 
Leta 2012 je bila ustanovljena projektna skupina za povezave med upravnimi viri podatkov, statističnimi podatki in mrežo FADN.
Various EU Member States participated, by sharing experiences on the different level of integration of their data sources. 
Sodelovale so različne države članice, tako da so si izmenjevale izkušnje o različni stopnji povezovanja svojih podatkovnih virov.
This work continues in Eurostat’s work on a strategy for agricultural statistics towards 2020 and beyond, which places great emphasis on the integration of different data sources. 
To delo se nadaljuje v okviru prizadevanj Eurostata v zvezi s strategijo za kmetijsko statistiko do leta 2020 in pozneje, ki zelo poudarja vključevanje različnih podatkovnih virov.
While various technical and legal problems need to be overcome, the better use of administrative data in statistics is clearly envisaged. 
Sicer je treba premagati različne tehnične in pravne težave, vendar je jasno predvidena boljša uporaba upravnih podatkov v statistiki.
They form the backbone of the quality assurance framework and are legally binding. 
Tvorijo ogrodje okvira za zagotavljanje kakovosti in so pravno zavezujoča.
The code of practice is a self-regulatory instrument adopted by the ESSC; its implementation in the ESS is monitored on the basis of peer reviews and improvement actions. 
Kodeks ravnanja je samoregulativni instrument, ki ga je sprejel Odbor za evropski statistični sistem (OESS); njegovo izvajanje v evropskem statističnem sistemu se spremlja na podlagi medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov in ukrepov za izboljšanje.
In accordance with the amended Regulation (EC) No 223/2009, Member States and the Commission shall take all the necessary measures to maintain confidence in European statistics via commitments on confidence in statistics. 
Države članice in Komisija v skladu s spremenjeno uredbo (ES) št.
54 The Commission has relaunched the request for EAA inventories. 
54 Komisija je znova uvedla zahtevo za opise metodologije ERK.
A new inventory exercise was launched in December 2014. 
Priprava novih opisov metodologij se je začela decembra 2014.
The provision of inventories was set for 30 September 2016. 
Opise je treba predložiti do 30. septembra 2016.
55 The new inventory exercise as mentioned under paragraph 54 will provide up-to-date information on methodologies, which can then be used to assess the issues mentioned in this observation. 
55 S pripravo novih opisov metodologij, kakor je omenjeno v točki 54, bodo zagotovljene najnovejše informacije o metodologijah, te pa se lahko potem uporabijo za oceno zadev, omenjenih v tem opažanju.
56 The Commission has been working on the inconsistencies found for wine and olive oil, in the context of the Working Group on Agricultural Accounts and Prices in December 2014, and this work is still ongoing. 
56 Komisija se je z nedoslednostmi, odkritimi v zvezi z vinom in oljčnim oljem, ukvarjala decembra 2014 v okviru delovne skupine za kmetijske račune in cene, to delo pa se še vedno nadaljuje.
Box 3 - Second indent The extent to which the same non-agricultural secondary activity is separable or not depends on administrative rules which vary across Member States. 
Okvir 3 – Druga alinea Obseg možnosti ločevanja ali neločevanja iste nekmetijske dopolnilne dejavnosti je odvisen od upravnih pravil, ki se po državah članicah razlikujejo.
In fact, Regulation (EC) No 138/2004 explicitly states that each country has to compile its own list of inseparable non-agricultural secondary activities, depending on the characteristics of its agriculture (Annex 1, 1.30). 
138/2004 je dejansko izrecno navedeno, da mora vsaka država, odvisno od značilnosti svojega kmetijstva, sestaviti svoj seznam neločljivih nekmetijskih dopolnilnih dejavnosti (Priloga I, 1.30).
Box 3 - Third indent According to Romanian authorities, the treatment of subsidies is in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 138/2004. 
Okvir 3– Tretja alinea Po navedbah romunskih organov se subvencije obravnavajo v skladu z določbami Uredbe (ES) št. 138/2004.
The subsidies in question are those arising from the single area payment scheme (SAPS), which is the simplified version of the single payment scheme, applicable in Member States which acceded to the European Union in 2004 or later.4 Romania contends that payments under the SAPS are subsidies which are not directly linked to production or the factors of production within the meaning of paragraph 3.065 and are direct income support within the meaning of paragraph 3.066. 
Zadevne subvencije izhajajo iz sheme enotnega plačila na površino, ki je poenostavljena različica sheme enotnega plačila in se uporablja v državah članicah, ki so k EU pristopile leta 2004 ali pozneje4. Romunija trdi, da gre pri plačilih v okviru sheme enotnega plačila na površino za subvencije, ki niso neposredno vezane na proizvodnjo ali proizvodne dejavnike v smislu odstavka 3.065 in so neposredna podpora proizvajalcem v smislu odstavka 3.066.
This issue will be followed up by the Commission. 
Komisija bo to vprašanje nadalje spremljala.
Box 3 - Fourth indent For France, the issue will be followed up by the Commission. 
Okvir 3 – Četrta alinea Kar zadeva Francijo, bo Komisija to vprašanje nadalje spremljala.
4 According to Regulation 138/2004, Annex, Section 2 Other subsidies on production, 3.065. Applying the accrual principle to the recording of other subsidies on production can be a delicate matter ... 
138/2004, Priloga, razdelek 2, Druge subvencije na proizvodnjo, 3.065 Uporaba obračunskega načela pri zajemanju drugih subvencij na proizvodnjo je lahko zelo kočljiva. [...]
In the case of subsidies which are not directly linked to production or the factors of production, it is difficult to determine the time of the transaction which gives rise to them and to distinguish it from the time when the subsidies are paid. 
Pri subvencijah, ki niso neposredno povezane s proizvodnjo ali proizvodnimi dejavniki, je težko opredeliti čas transakcije, ki jih je povzročila, in jih ločiti od časa, ko so bile dejansko plačane.
In this particular case, subsidies are recorded when they are received. 
V tem primeru se subvencije evidentirajo v trenutku, ko so prejete.
3.066. The following special treatments are recommended: ... other subsidies not directly on products or factors of production (direct income support, aid to less-favoured areas, etc.): it is recommended that the criterion depending on the time of payment continues to be used, because it is difficult to determine when the application for compensation was filed and whether the amounts in question are accurate 
3.066 Priporočajo se naslednje posebne obravnave: [...] druge subvencije, ki niso neposredno povezane s proizvodi ali proizvodnimi dejavniki (neposredna podpora proizvajalcem, pomoč za območja z omejenimi možnostmi itd.): priporoča se nadaljnja uporaba merila odvisnosti od časa plačila, ker je težko opredeliti čas vložitve zahtevka za nadomestilo in ali so zadevni zneski točni.
Reply of the Commission 62 57 Revision of statistical data is a standard and world-wide applied approach in all domains of statistics. 
Odgovori Komisije 62 57 Popravek statističnih podatkov je standarden in po vsem svetu uporabljen pristop na vseh področjih statistike.
Revisions are made when new information becomes available that can be integrated into the results to achieve better quality. 
Do popravkov pride, kadar so na voljo nove informacije, ki jih je mogoče vključiti v rezultate in doseči boljšo kakovost.
Revisions improve the quality of the results. 
S popravki se izboljša kakovost rezultatov.
Validation procedures trigger reactions from the Commission to the sender when updates exceed certain thresholds. 
Postopki potrjevanja sprožijo odziv Komisije pošiljatelju, kadar posodobitve presežejo določene prage.