natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Good performance data are essential throughout the policy management cycle for assessing achievements and judging whether corrective action is needed122. Corrective action includes preparing subsequent legislation – and, specifically for 2014-2020, carrying out a meaningful performance review123 (see GP No 6). This will become even more important in the context of the increased scope to link payments directly to performance. 
Kakovostni podatki o smotrnosti poslovanja so v celotnem ciklu upravljanja politike bistveni za ocenjevanje dosežkov in presojo, ali so potrebni popravljalni ukrepi.122 Ti vključujejo pripravo naknadne zakonodaje ter zlasti za obdobje 2014–2020 izvedbo smiselnega pregleda smotrnosti poslovanja123 (glej vodilno načelo 6). To bo še bolj pomembno, če se bo povečala možnost za neposredno povezavo med plačili in smotrnostjo.
81 The legislative framework has been reinforced for 2014-2020 compared to the 2007-2013 period by, for example, the introduction of the mandatory electronic exchange of performance information between beneficiaries, Member State authorities and the Commission, and by measures to safeguard the quality of the data at Member State level. 
81 Zakonodajni okvir za obdobje 2014–2020 je bil v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007– 2013 okrepljen, na primer z uvedbo obvezne elektronske izmenjave informacij o smotrnosti poslovanja med upravičenci, organi držav članic in Komisijo ter z ukrepi za zagotovitev kakovosti podatkov na ravni držav članic.
The proposals for 2021-2027 maintain these arrangements and also require Member States to transmit performance data every 2 months, which should improve the timeliness of data. 
Predlogi za obdobje 2021–2027 še vedno vsebujejo te ureditve, določajo pa tudi, da morajo države članice predložiti podatke o smotrnosti poslovanja vsaka dva meseca, zaradi česar naj bi se izboljšala pravočasnost podatkov.
82 A frequent finding in our audits has been deficiencies in relation to the reliability, completeness or timeliness of the information presented by the Member States (where most of the data are generated) to the Commission. 
82 Sodišče je pri revizijah pogosto ugotovilo pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z zanesljivostjo, popolnostjo ali pravočasnostjo informacij, ki so jih države članice (ki pripravijo največ podatkov) predložile Komisiji.
The proposals for 2021-2027 make the Member States responsible for the quality and reliability of the monitoring system and for the data on indicators124. We however still consider that the proposals are not sufficiently clear about who is responsible for checking the 34 10 Monitoring systems ensure timely performance data of good quality 2007-2013 2014-2020 2021-2027 
Predlogi za obdobje 2021–2027 določajo, da so države članice odgovorne za kakovost in zanesljivost sistema spremljanja ter podatke o kazalnikih.124 Vendar Sodišče meni, da predlogi niso dovolj jasni glede tega, kdo je 34 10. Sistemi spremljanja zagotavljajo pravočasne in kakovostne podatke o smotrnosti. 2007– 2013 2014– 2020 2021– 2027
quality of the data, in particular the role of the Monitoring Committee and the Commission125. 
odgovoren za preverjanje kakovosti podatkov, zlasti glede vloge odbora za spremljanje in Komisije.125 1.
Monitoring systems produce performance data of good quality, available at the right time 83 For all three periods, there is a legal requirement for the Managing Authorities to set up a system enabling the recording and storage of performance data in computerised form. 
S sistemi spremljanja se pripravijo kakovostni podatki o smotrnosti poslovanja, ki so na voljo pravočasno 83 V vseh treh obdobjih velja za organe upravljanja zakonodajna zahteva, da vzpostavijo sistem, ki omogoča računalniško evidentiranje in shranjevanje podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja.
The 2014-2020 period saw a significant improvement in the provisions contributing to the production of performance data of good quality by monitoring systems: o The Member States could exchange information with beneficiaries by electronic means (“e-cohesion”). 
V obdobju 2014–2020 so se znatno izboljšale določbe, ki prispevajo k pripravi kakovostnih podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja s sistemi spremljanja: o države članice bi si lahko z upravičenci elektronsko izmenjevale informacije (e-kohezija).
This is mandatory in the proposal for 2021-2027. o The Commission put in place a system enabling Managing Authorities to transmit performance data electronically and in structured form to the Commission (maintained for 2021-2027). o Arrangements for data collection and processing in relation to result indicators were included in the context of ex ante conditionalities. This is proposed to be discontinued for 2021-2027. 
To je obvezna zahteva v predlogu za obdobje 2021–2027, o Komisija je vzpostavila sistem, ki organom upravljanja omogoča elektronski prenos podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja v strukturirani obliki Komisiji (ohranjeno za obdobje 2021–2027), o ureditve za zbiranje in obdelavo podatkov v zvezi s kazalniki rezultatov so bile vključene v okvir predhodnih pogojenosti.
84 The proposals for 2021-2017 require Member States to transmit performance data every 2 months, which should improve the timeliness of data. 
84 V predlogih za obdobje 2021–2027 je določeno, da morajo države članice predložiti podatke o smotrnosti poslovanja vsaka dva meseca, zaradi česar naj bi se izboljšala pravočasnost podatkov.
85 Despite these arrangements, weaknesses in data quality are one of the most frequent issues found in our audits. 
85 Kljub tem ureditvam so slabosti v zvezi s kakovostjo podatkov ena od najpogostejših težav, ugotovljenih pri revizijah Sodišča.
35 Special report on Youth unemployment All Member States visited had only limited information on the type of assistance that NEETs had received prior to the launch of the Youth Guarantee, on the number of offers/services provided and the related costs. 
35 Posebno poročilo o brezposelnosti mladih Vse obiskane države članice so imele na voljo le omejene informacije o vrsti pomoči, ki so jo osebe, ki niso zaposlene, se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo, prejele pred uvedbo jamstva za mlade, o številu zagotovljenih ponudb/storitev in s tem povezanih stroških.
We also noted several inconsistencies and reliability issues in the data reported by Member States, affecting comparability. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi več nedoslednosti in težav z zanesljivostjo pri podatkih, ki so jih sporočile države članice, kar vpliva na primerljivost.
Problems, including the completeness of data, were noted in Member States that had multiple Youth Guarantee providers but no single harmonised reporting system126. 2. 
V državah članicah, ki so imele več ponudnikov jamstva za mlade, ne pa tudi poenotenega sistema poročanja, so bili ugotovljeni problemi, tudi v zvezi s popolnostjo podatkov.126 2.
The quality of this data should be safeguarded by the Commission and the Member States 86 For both 2007-2013 and 2014-2020, Member States were responsible for setting up monitoring and reporting systems and for ensuring their reliability. 
Komisija in države članice bi morale poskrbeti za zagotovitev kakovosti teh podatkov 86 Države članice so bile v obdobju 2007–2013 in tudi v obdobju 2014–2020 odgovorne za vzpostavitev sistemov spremljanja in poročanja ter zagotovitev njihove zanesljivosti.
These systems are audited by the audit authorities (the “designation” process) before programme implementation starts. 
Revizijski organi (proces imenovanja) te sisteme revidirajo pred začetkom izvajanja programov.
The Commission should check the reliability of the data provided by the Member States through its audits. 
Komisija bi morala z revizijami preveriti zanesljivost podatkov, ki jih predložijo države članice.
Both the Commission and the audit authorities should also check the robustness of the systems for recording the data on implementation provided by the Member States through their system audit work127. 87 The 2014-2020 period strengthened responsibilities for safeguarding the quality of the data in the Member States. 
Komisija in revizijski organi bi morali z revizijo sistemov preveriti tudi trdnost sistemov za evidentiranje podatkov o izvajanju, ki jih predložijo države članice.127 87 V obdobju 2014–2020 so se okrepile pristojnosti držav članic za zagotovitev kakovosti podatkov.
Managing Authorities have to confirm the reliability of the performance data to the Commission in their management declarations. 
Organi upravljanja morajo Komisiji v izjavah o upravljanju potrditi zanesljivost podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja.
Audit Authorities then confirm this assessment in their audit opinions. 
Revizijski organi nato to oceno potrdijo v revizijskih mnenjih.
The Commission may also suspend payments if there is a serious deficiency in the quality and reliability of the monitoring systems or of the performance data. 
Komisija lahko tudi začasno ustavi plačila, če sta kakovost in zanesljivost sistemov spremljanja ali podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja resno pomanjkljivi.
As at April 2019, the Commission had initiated two of these payment suspensions procedures. 
Do aprila 2019 je Komisija začela dva taka postopka začasne ustavitve plačil.
88 A number of our audits found specific weaknesses related to the arrangements for safeguarding the quality of data at both Member State and Commission level. 
88 V več revizijah, ki jih je opravilo Sodišče, so bile ugotovljene specifične slabosti, povezane z ureditvami za zagotovitev kakovosti podatkov tako na ravni držav članic in tudi na ravni Komisije.
36 Special report on ERDF support to SMEs in the area of e-commerce In two of the Member States selected, Managing Authorities had not carried out the necessary checks on the reliability of the data fed into the system128. Special report on the selection and monitoring for ERDF and ESF projects in the 2014–2020 period We noted that in the 2014-2020 period the Commission and Audit Authority audits on the monitoring systems and the reliability and availability of the data did not start, for the most part, until 2017, limiting the assurance obtained. 
36 Posebno poročilo o podpori ESRR malim in srednje velikim podjetjem na področju e-trgovanja V dveh od izbranih držav članic organi upravljanja niso izvedli potrebnih pregledov zanesljivosti podatkov, vnesenih v sistem.128 Posebno poročilo o izboru in spremljanju projektov Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Evropskega socialnega sklada v obdobju 2014– 2020 Sodišče je v zvezi z obdobjem 2014–2020 ugotovilo, da Komisija in revizijski organ večjega dela revizij sistemov spremljanja ter zanesljivosti in razpoložljivosti podatkov nista začela do leta 2017, zaradi česar je bilo pridobljeno zagotovilo omejeno.
We noted that as the performance review will take place in 2019, there is a risk that any corrective measures cannot be completed in time and that the performance review will not be based on correct information129. 89 In 2013, the Commission’s IAS also found problems with the arrangements in place to safeguard the quality of the 2007-2013 performance data. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da bo pregled smotrnosti poslovanja potekal leta 2019, zato do takrat obstaja tveganje, da popravljalnih ukrepov ne bo mogoče izvesti pravočasno in da pregled smotrnosti poslovanja ne bo temeljil na pravilnih informacijah.129 89 Leta 2013 je tudi Služba za notranjo revizijo Komisije ugotovila težave z vzpostavljenimi ureditvami za zagotovitev kakovosti podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja
The IAS recommended that DG REGIO/EMPL develop a strategy to improve the reliability of Member State performance information. 
Služba za notranjo revizijo je priporočila, naj GD REGIO/EMPL pripravi strategijo za povečanje zanesljivosti informacij o smotrnosti poslovanja držav članic.
According to the IAS follow-up audit the recommendation was implemented in 2016. 
Glede na revizijo za spremljanje izvajanja priporočil, ki jo je opravila Služba za notranjo revizijo, je bilo priporočilo izvedeno v letu 2016.
90 We consider that the proposed Regulation for 2021-2027 is still not sufficiently clear about who is responsible for safeguarding the quality of the data. 
90 Sodišče meni, da predlog uredbe za obdobje 2021–2027 še vedno ni dovolj jasen glede tega, kdo je odgovoren za zagotavljanje kakovosti podatkov.
While it proposes that the Monitoring Committee will oversee programme implementation and examine and approve annual and final performance reports submitted to the Commission, this is not the case for the performance data. 
Čeprav vključuje predlog, da mora odbor za spremljanje nadzorovati izvajanje programa ter preverjati in odobriti letna poročila in končna poročila o smotrnosti, predložena Komisiji, mu ni treba preverjati in odobriti podatkov o smotrnosti.
We also noted that there are no provisions in the proposed CPR on the Commission’s role in verifying the quality of the data transmitted to it130. 91 Public accountability for achieving results with EU funding provides an important link between the EU and its citizens. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da predlog uredbe o skupnih določbah ne vključuje določb o vlogi Komisije pri preverjanju kakovosti predloženih podatkov.130 91 Javna odgovornost za doseganje rezultatov s sredstvi EU zagotavlja pomembno povezavo med EU in njenimi državljani.
The rules governing accountability related to legality and regularity have not, in general, been extended to performance. 
Predpisi, ki urejajo odgovornost v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo, na splošno niso bili razširjeni na smotrnost.
Accountability depends on the availability of good data and reports on whether objectives have been met, but this is often not in place. 
Odgovornost je odvisna od razpoložljivosti kakovostnih podatkov in poročil o tem, ali so bili cilji izpolnjeni, vendar ti podatki pogosto niso na voljo.
Reports should provide a true and fair view of performance and be publicly available 92 There is a need for consistent reporting about the results of EU interventions. 
Poročila bi morala zagotavljati resničen in pošten prikaz smotrnosti ter biti javno dostopna 92 O rezultatih intervencij EU je treba stalno poročati.
It is particularly important that the results reported are reliable and are in line with objectives131. The problems identified with the existence and reliability of data (see GPs No 5, 8 and 10), together with the problems in translating strategic objectives into operational objectives for managers (see GP No 1), limit the Commission’s ability to report on performance against these high-level objectives132. 
Zlasti pomembno je, da so sporočeni rezultati zanesljivi in v skladu s cilji.131 Ugotovljeni problemi v zvezi z obstojem in zanesljivostjo podatkov (glej vodilna načela 5, 8 in 10), skupaj s problemi pri prenosu strateških ciljev v operativne cilje za upravljavce (glej vodilno načelo 1), omejujejo zmogljivost Komisije za poročanje o smotrnosti glede na te cilje na visoki ravni.132 93 Poročila EU o smotrnosti bi morala zagotavljati resničen in pošten prikaz tega, kar je bilo doseženo.133 Poročanje Komisije o smotrnosti ni ustrezno uravnovešeno, saj zagotavlja malo informacij o izzivih in neuspehih.134 Poleg tega ne priznava omejitev, ki izhajajo iz tega, da se mora zanašati na podatke držav članic, ki bi lahko bili netočni ali nezanesljivi.135 94 Javna razpoložljivost informacij o smotrnosti poslovanja je pomemben vidik odgovornosti.136 Od leta 2014 so informacije v zvezi z napredkom glede na vse skupne 37 11.
Since 2014, progress against all Cohesion common indicators, as reported by the Managing Authorities, has been publicly available on the Commission’s Cohesion open data platform. 
kazalnike kohezijske politike, kot jih sporočijo organi upravljanja, javno dostopne na odprti podatkovni platformi Komisije za kohezijsko politiko.
However, we consider that, in terms of the proposals for 2021-2027, the discontinuation of both Member States’ annual implementation reports137, and the strategic reports by the Commission to the discharge authorities on 37 11 There is clear accountability for performance 2007-2013 2014-2020 2021-2027 the extent to which the Funds achieve the strategic objectives, constitutes a backward step138. 
Vendar Sodišče meni, da je ukinitev letnih poročil držav članic o izvajanju137 in strateških poročil Komisije, predloženih organom za razrešnico, o obsegu, v katerem skladi dosegajo strateške cilje, v okviru predlogov za obdobje 2021–2027 korak nazaj.138 2.
2. Those responsible for implementing the EU budget should take ownership for the sound financial management of the EU budget 95 The existence of good data and reports on whether objectives have been met and results achieved should allow those responsible for implementing the EU budget to take ownership for sound financial management as required by the Financial Regulation139. 
Pristojni za izvajanje proračuna EU bi morali prevzeti odgovornost za dobro finančno poslovodenje proračuna EU 95 Obstoj kakovostnih podatkov in poročil tem, ali so bili cilji in rezultati doseženi, bi moral pristojnim za izvajanje proračuna EU omogočati, da prevzamejo odgovornost za dobro finančno poslovodenje, kot določa finančna uredba.139 96 Sodišče je v zvezi s programi iz obdobja 2007–2013 obžalovalo, da postopek zaključevanja ne vključuje sprejetja vidikov smotrnosti, kot so doseženi rezultati, v okviru Komisije, pa tudi da Komisija proračunskemu organu ne poroča o smotrnosti.140 97 Čeprav letna poročila o dejavnostih vključujejo izjavo o zanesljivosti generalnih direktorjev, da so bila, med drugim, sredstva, dodeljena dejavnostim, ki so opisane v poročilu, porabljena v skladu z namenom in načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, v praksi predloženo zagotovilo izrecno izključuje vprašanja smotrnosti.
Assurance, and any associated reservations, is limited to issues of regularity and internal control141. 98 In addition, in each annual activity report, the Director-General declares that the information in the report gives a true and fair view. 
Zagotovilo in vsi z njim povezani pridržki so omejeni na vprašanja pravilnosti in notranjega nadzora.141 98 Poleg tega generalni direktor v vsakem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih izjavi, da so informacije v poročilu resničen in pošten prikaz stanja.
In previous years, this declaration did not extend to the quality of the reported performance data142.The Commission’s internal instructions on the preparation of the 2018 annual activity reports, published in spring 2019, do now require a statement by a member of the senior management of the Director-General to cover performance data, designed to support the latter’s declaration. 
Prejšnja leta ta izjava ni zajemala kakovosti sporočenih podatkov o smotrnosti poslovanja.142 Notranja navodila Komisije o pripravi letnih poročil o dejavnostih za leto 2018, ki so bila objavljena spomladi 2019, pa zdaj določajo, da mora izjava člana višjega vodstva generalnega direktorja zajemati podatke o smotrnosti poslovanja, s katerimi se podpira njegova izjava.
The practical impact of these additional statements is unclear from the guidance, and they have not yet been examined by us. 
Iz smernic ni razviden praktični učinek teh dodatnih izjav, poleg tega pa jih Sodišče še ni preučilo.
99 It is important to use performance information to manage activities, optimise results and make adjustments to management systems, as well as to support the strategic planning process143. 
99 Uporaba informacij o smotrnosti poslovanja je pomembna za upravljanje dejavnosti, optimizacijo rezultatov in prilagajanje sistemov upravljanja, pa tudi za podporo procesa strateškega načrtovanja.143 To velja za vse faze cikla proračunskega 38 12.
This applies at all stages of the budgetary management cycle, from the allocation of funds during the MFF, to programming and to the management of projects itself. 
upravljanja od dodelitve sredstev v večletnem finančnem okviru do načrtovanja programov in upravljanja samih projektov.
100 For the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 periods, information on the performance of programmes (including difficulties arising and the measures taken to address them) has been sent to the Commission by Member States via their annual implementation reports; these reports are approved by Monitoring Committees and subsequently validated by the Commission. 
100 Za obdobji 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 so države članice informacije o smotrnosti programov (vključno z nastajajočimi težavami in ukrepi za njihovo reševanje) Komisiji poslale z letnimi poročili o izvajanju. Ta poročila odobrijo odbori za spremljanje, nato pa jih potrdi Komisija.
Instead, for 2021-2027, the Commission proposes to use the annual performance review meetings between the Commission and Member States to review the program performance. However, the proposal is unclear as regards the participants, the content and the consequences of these meetings144. 
Za obdobje 2021–2027 Komisija predlaga, naj se namesto tega uporabijo seje za letni pregled smotrnosti med Komisijo in državami članicami, na katerih se pregleda smotrnost programov.
A particular issue is that underperformance does not lead to financial sanctions, at either the strategic, programme or project level. 
Posebna težava je, da za slabo smotrnost ni finančnih sankcij niti na strateški ravni niti na ravni programov ali projektov.
Meaningful performance information should be available for evidence-based decision making 102 We have reported in previous GPs (see GPs No 5, 8 and 10) that the availability of meaningful performance information is not guaranteed, which in itself limits its use for decision-making and corrective actions. 
Smiselne informacije o smotrnosti poslovanja bi morale biti na voljo za odločanje na podlagi dokazov 102 V zvezi s prejšnjimi vodilnimi načeli (glej vodilna načela 5, 8 in 10) je Sodišče poročalo, da ni zagotovljena razpoložljivost smiselnih informacij o smotrnosti poslovanja, zaradi česar je uporaba teh informacij pri odločanju in popravljalnih ukrepih omejena.
In addition, there is an inherent timing problem in the programme management cycle, as it takes some time before results (from monitoring systems) become available and can be used for decision-making. 
Poleg tega je s ciklom upravljanja programov neločljivo povezana težava glede časovnega okvira, saj je potrebnega nekaj časa, preden so rezultati (iz sistemov spremljanja) na voljo in se lahko uporabijo pri odločanju.
This late availability of results has been exacerbated by delays in the start of the programmes (see GP No 7). 
Ta pozna razpoložljivost rezultatov se je poslabšala zaradi zamud pri začetku programov (glej vodilno načelo 7).
The European Parliament Research Service has noted that there is no "cooling-off" phase between two MFF cycles, and that full policy lessons learned from a previous programme period are not yet available when reflections on future proposals and positions need to start146. The same issue exists for information generated by ex post evaluations for a particular programme period147 (see GP No 13). 2. 
Služba Evropskega parlamenta za raziskave je navedla, da med dvema cikloma večletnega finančnega okvira ni faze mirovanja ter da v času, ko je treba začeti razmišljati o prihodnjih predlogih in stališčih, še niso v celoti na voljo izkušnje v zvezi s področjem, pridobljene v prejšnjem programskem obdobju.146 Enaka težava je pri informacijah, zbranih z naknadnimi vrednotenji posameznega programskega obdobja147 (glej vodilno načelo 13). 2.
When it exists, performance information should be used to monitor and to take remedial action 103 In terms of the strategic process, we noted in GP No 2 that the allocation of funding to Member States should be informed by past performance information. 
Če so informacije o smotrnosti poslovanja na voljo, bi jih bilo treba uporabiti za spremljanje in sprejemanje popravljalnih ukrepov 103 Kar zadeva strateški proces, je Sodišče v zvezi z vodilnim načelom 2 ugotovilo, da bi dodelitev sredstev državam članicam morala temeljiti na informacijah o pretekli smotrnosti poslovanja.