natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There was no systematic analysis in the files presenting the arguments and evidence in support of the recommendations. 
Dokumentacija, ki vsebuje argumente in dokazila v prid priporočil, ni bila sistematično analizirana.
Tests were carried out on a selection of 30 cases recorded in the ECR, where the Commission had decided that the cost should be charged to Member States. 
Opravljeni so bili preizkusi vzorca 30 primerov, evidentiranih v ECR, za katere je Komisija sklenila, da je stroške treba zaračunati v breme držav članic.
The selection concentrated on pre-1996 cases as there had been no clearance-of-accounts decision on cases since that year except for the special exercise mentioned below. 
Vzorec je vseboval predvsem primere pred letom 1996, ker od tega leta ni bil sprejet noben sklep o potrditvi obračuna za primere, razen spodaj navedene posebne naloge.
Of the 30 cases examined, only three contained satisfactory evidence that the amounts had in fact been recovered from Member States (2). 
Od 30 pregledanih primerov so le trije vsebovali zadovoljiva dokazila o tem, da so države članice dejansko izterjale zneske (2).
Some 30 cases recorded as charged to the budget were also examined. 
Pregledanih je bilo tudi 30 primerov, pri katerih je bilo zapisano, da so obračunani v breme proračuna.
In eight cases the files could not be found and in 15 cases there was insufficient evidence (3) that the amounts were irrecoverable. 
V osmih primerih dokumentacije ni bilo mogoče najti in v petnajstih primerih ni bilo zadovoljivih dokazil (3) o tem, da so zneski neizterljivi.
There were reasoned arguments for decisions in few (4) of the files examined. 
Le malo (4) pregledanih datotek je vsebovalo utemeljene argumente za sklep.
Under the clearance-of-accounts procedure, disallowance of expenditure normally takes the form of a Ôflat-rate correctionŐ: the Commission judges that a Member State has failed to manage certain expenditure properly and disallows from EU financing (i.e. in effect charges to the Member State) a percentage of the expenditure concerned as a sanction for poor management and an incentive for improvement. 
V postopku potrditve obračunov ima zavrnitev odhodka navadno obliko „pavšalnega popravka“: Komisija sklene, da država članica določen odhodek ni pravilno vodila ter iz financiranja EU izključi (dejansko obračuna v breme države članice) odstotek zadevnega odhodka kot kazen za slabo vodenje in spodbudo za izboljšanje.
Some Member States have taken the opportunity of such flat-rate corrections to write off debts arising from irregularities committed in that same area of expenditure up to the value of the correction, rather than proposing writing off under the condition discussed in paragraphs 33 to 37. 
Nekatere države članice so izkoristile take pavšalne popravke za odpis dolgov, ki izhajajo iz nepravilnosti, storjenih na istem področju odhodkov, in sicer do vrednosti popravka, namesto da bi predlagale odpis pod pogojem, navedenim v odstavkih 33 do 37.
The Commission considers that this practice is not in conformity with the legal provisions relating to clearance of accounts. 
Komisija meni, da tako ravnanje ni skladno s pravnimi določbami v zvezi s potrditvijo obračunov.
Neither OLAF nor the Directorate-General for Agriculture has maintained records of such accounts written off, nor reconciled them with the amounts of the related clearance-of-accounts corrections. 
Niti OLAF niti Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo ne hranita evidence o takih odpisih, ki jih nista uskladila z zneski povezanih popravkov v potrditvi obračunov.
The total amount written off in this way is therefore not known. 
Celotni tako odpisani znesek zato ni znan.
(2) Five files could not be found; four cases had been treated as being already covered by flat rate corrections and in one case the amount had been charged to the budget not to the Member State. 
(2) Pet dokumentacij ni bilo mogoče najti, štirje primeri so bili obravnavani, kot da so že poravnani s pavšalnimi popravki, v enem primeru pa je bil znesek obračunan v breme proračuna in ne države članice.
(3) For example, bankruptcy or winding up orders. 
(3) Na primer nalogi za stečaj ali likvidacijo.
(4) There were reasoned arguments in eight of the 30 files examined. 
(4) V osmih od 30 pregledanih dokumentacij so bili argumenti utemeljeni.
Live bovine animals for slaughter, exported to Poland with refunds in 1990, were misdeclared as pure-bred animals with resulting irregular payments in three cases of 2,6 million euro. 
Živo govedo za zakol, leta 1990 z izvoznimi nadomestili izvoženo na Poljsko, je bilo napačno prijavljeno kot čistopasemske živali, kar je v treh primerih povzročilo nepravilna plačila v višini 2,6 milijona EUR.
These cases were excluded from a clearance-of-accounts financial correction in 1994 for similar cases pending the result of recovery action. 
Ti primeri so bili izključeni iz finančnih popravkov potrditve obračunov leta 1994 za podobne primere, dokler ne bodo znani rezultati ukrepov izterjave.
In 1999 the Court of Justice upheld the CommissionŐs financial correction. 
Leta 1999 je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti potrdilo finančne popravke Komisije.
The Commission has since however failed to follow up the three cases excluded. 
Vendar pa Komisija od takrat ni več sledila trem izključenim primerom.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/11 49. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/11 49.
OLAF initiated a special exercise in March 1999 to examine pre-1996 amounts to be recovered. 
OLAF je marca 1999 začel izvajati posebno nalogo, da bi pregledal zneske za izterjavo, nastale pred letom 1996.
Old cases were defined as cases with administrative delays exceeding four years and/or judicial delays exceeding eight years (1). 
Stari primeri so bili opredeljeni kot primeri z upravnimi zamudami več kot štirih let in/ali sodnimi zamudami več kot osmih let (1).
All such cases with amounts outstanding of more than 50 000 euro were to be examined in depth. 
Podrobno so bili pregledani vsi taki neporavnani primeri, ki so presegali 50 000 EUR.
Those less than 50 000 euro were to be subject to a less rigorous review. 
Zneski, manjši od 50 000 EUR, niso bili tako strogo pregledani.
The Commission Decision (2) on these cases was published on 28 June 2003. 
Sklep Komisije(2) o teh primerih je bil objavljen 28. junija 2003.
The amount of 69,4 million euro was written off against the budget and 5,3 million charged to Member States. 
Od proračuna je bilo odpisanih 69,4 milijona EUR, v breme držav članic pa je bilo obračunanih 5,3 milijona EUR.
Italian cases, which account for 66 % (750 million euro) of the amount to be recovered for pre-1995 cases, were excluded from the recommendations and decision. 
Italijanski primeri, ki so zajemali 66 % (750 milijonov EUR) zneska za izterjavo iz primerov pred letom 1995, so bili izvzeti iz priporočil in sklepa.
No reason was given for this. 
Za to ni bil predstavljen noben razlog.
Also excluded from consideration were 95 pre-1995 cases for a total value of 118,8 million euro. 
Preučitev tudi ni zajemala 95 primerov, nastalih pred letom 1995, v skupni vrednosti 118,8 milijona EUR.
As was the case for recommendations made under the normal procedure, there was no systematic analysis in the files of the reasons leading to the recommendations. 
Ker je bil primer za priporočila oblikovan po običajnem postopku, v dokumentaciji niso bili sistematično analizirani razlogi, na podlagi katerih so bila dana priporočila.
The Commission has now set up a task force to examine pre-1999 cases for amounts in excess of 500 000 euro. 
Komisija je zdaj ustanovila delovno skupino, ki naj bi pregledala primere, nastale pred letom 1999, katerih zneski presegajo 500 000 EUR.
Division of responsibilities in the Commission 52. 
Porazdelitev odgovornosti v Komisiji 52.
As explained above, OLAF manages the ECR database. 
Kot je že navedeno, OLAF vodi zbirko podatkov ECR.
The Directorate-General for Agriculture is responsible for clearance-of-accounts decisions. 
Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo je odgovoren za sklepe o potrditvi obračunov.
There are instances in which this division of responsibilities causes problems of communication: (a) there was no provision for the Directorate-General for Agriculture to transmit systematically to OLAF copies of all clearance decisions whereby Member States have been charged with the financial consequences of irregularities. 
V nekaterih primerih pa porazdelitev odgovornosti povzroča težave pri komuniciranju: (a) ni bilo določbe, ki bi Generalnemu direktoratu za kmetijstvo naložila, da mora OLAF-u sistematično pošiljati kopije vseh sklepov o potrditvi obračuna, na podlagi katerih so bile finančne posledice nepravilnosti obračunane v breme držav članic.
Consequently there was no systematic evidence in the OLAF files that the amounts recorded as having been charged to Member States had actually been recovered under the clearance-of-accounts procedure; (b) the 1995 decision (3) to write off amounts against the budget was not reflected in the ECR database. 
Zato ni bilo sistematičnih dokazil v OLAF-ovi dokumentaciji, da so bili zneski, pri katerih je zapisano, da so obračunani v breme držav članic, dejansko izterjani v skladu s postopkom potrditve obračunov; (b) sklep iz leta 1995 (3) o odpisu zneskov iz proračuna ni bil razviden v zbirki podatkov ECR.
As a result cases were examined again in 2003 and in some instances the decision was the opposite of that taken in 1995; (c) some Member States have written off amounts on the basis of OLAFŐs recommendations in advance of a Commission Decision. 
Zato so bili leta 2003 primeri ponovno pregledani in v nekaterih primerih je bil sklep v nasprotju s sklepom, sprejetim leta 1995; (c) nekatere države članice so odpisale zneske na podlagi priporočil OLAF-a, preden je Komisija sprejela sklep.
(1) This definition is derived from the judgment in European Court of Justice Case No C-34/89. 
(1) Ta opredelitev izhaja iz sodbe Evropskega sodišča v primeru št. C-C-34/89.
(2) Commission Decision 2003/481/EC of 27 June 2003 (OJ L 160, 28.6.2003, p. 
(2) Odločba Komisije 2003/481/ES z dne 27. junija 2003 (UL L 160, 28.6.2003, str.
(3) This was the last of the annual decisions dealing with cases recommended for writing off by Member States. 
(3) To je bila zadnja od letnih odločitev o primerih, ki so jih države članice pripo-ročile za odpis.
Current arrangements split nominal and effective responsibility for this procedure in a way which reduces accountability. 
V skladu s trenutnimi ureditvami je nominalna in dejanska odgovornost za ta postopek razdeljena na način, ki zmanjšuje odgovornost.
Recommending writing off is not a function that fits well the role of a fraud investigation and coordination body. 
Dajanje priporočil za ukrep odpisa ni funkcija, skladna z vlogo organa za koordinacijo in preiskave goljufij.
The Commission makes little use of its experience of irregularities 54. 
Komisija premalo uporablja svoje izkušnje na področju nepravilnosti 54.
Notifications to OLAF for input to the ECR were intended, amongst other things, to intensify the campaign against fraud and irregularities. 
Prijave OLAF-u, ki naj bi jih ta vključil v ECR, naj bi med drugim okrepile kampanjo proti goljufijam in nepravilnostim.
In this context, the Council (4) requested the Commission to develop an investigation policy based upon strategic and operational analysis of information on fraud, irregularities and recoveries reported by Member States. 
Glede na to je Svet (4) zaprosil Komisijo, da ta razvije preiskovalno strategijo, ki bi temeljila na strateški in operativni analizi podatkov o goljufijah, nepravilnostih in izterjavah, ki jih prijavijo države članice.
Parliament (5) has criticised the fact that the debt arising from irregularities and fraud has built up to an unacceptable level and that the recovery procedures do not work. 
Parlament (5) je obsodil dejstvo, da se je dolg, ki izhaja iz nepravilnosti in goljufij, povzpel na nesprejem-ljivo raven in da postopki izterjave ne delujejo.
It called upon the Commission to submit a detailed analysis of the causes of this problem and proposals to remedy it. 
Komisijo je pozval, da predloži podrobno analizo vzrokov za ta problem in predloge za njegovo odpravo.
The Commission (6) submitted a communication on improving the recovery of Community entitlements in December 2002. 
Komisija (6) je decembra leta 2002 predložila sporočilo o izboljšanju postopka izterjav terjatev Skupnosti.
Parliament expressed doubts that the recovery procedures could be improved without clarification of the division of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture. 
Parlament je podvomil o tem, da bi se postopki izterjave lahko izboljšali, če se ne določi jasna porazdelitev odgovornosti med OLAF-om in Generalnim direktoratom za kmetijstvo.
The Commission has drawn attention to the poor quality of information provided by Member States in its Annual Report on the fight against fraud 2002. 
Komisija je opozorila na slabo kakovost podatkov, ki so jih države članice predložile v njenem letnem Poročilu o boju proti goljufijam za leto 2002.
It quotes the example that in 47 % of cases reported, the products involved were not identified, which does not facilitate risk analysis and which makes it harder to draw appropriate lessons. 
Kot primer je navedla, da v 47 % prijavljenih primerov niso bili opredeljeni vključeni proizvodi, zaradi česar je težko opraviti analizo tveganja in pripraviti ustrezne smernice.
It is attempting to improve the quality and timeliness of notifications by the introduction of direct input to the ECR by Member States, coupled with a programme of training courses and the provision of an ECR user manual. 
Prizadeva si, da bi izboljšala kakovost in pravočasnost prijav z uvedbo neposrednega vpisa v ECR, ki naj bi ga izvedle države članice, ter s programi usposabljanja in priročnikom za uporabo ECR.
(4) Council conclusions on protection of the financial interests of the Communities and the fight against fraud 13244/1/02 REV 1 of 6 November 2002. 
(4) Sklepi Sveta o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boju proti goljufijam, 13244/1/02 REV 1 z dne 6. novembra 2002.
(5) Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control on the Annual Report on the fight against fraud 2001, PE 315.805 of 3 March 2003. 
(5) Poročilo Odbora za proračunski nadzor o Letnem poročilu o boju proti goljufijam za leto 2001. PE 315.805 z dne 3. marca 2003.
(6) COM(2002) 671 final of 3 December 2002. 
(6) COM(2002) 671 konč. z dne 3. 12.
In the framework of the clearance of accounts for 1993, the Commission proposed to charge Germany 8,2 million euro for 21 cases where it considered Germany to have been negligent in its recovery action. 
2002. Komisija je v okviru potrditve obračunov za leto 1993 predlagala, da se v breme Nemčije obračuna 8,2 milijona EUR za 21 primerov, za katere je menila, da je bila Nemčija malomarna pri ukrepih izterjave.
The financial correction was however not implemented because of inadequate bilateral consultation. 
Finančni popravek pa ni bil izveden zaradi nezadostnih dvostranskih posvetovanj.
All but two of the cases were reconsidered for the 1995 decision and were charged to the EAGGF. 
Vsi primeri, razen dveh, so bili ponovno pregledani v okviru sklepa leta 1995 in obračunani v breme EKUJS.
The Commission has not documented the reasons for reversing its original proposal. 
Komisija ni evidentirala razlogov za razveljavitev svojega prvotnega predloga.
C 269/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 57. 
C 269/12 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.11.2004 57.
There are too many descriptions for the type of fraud and irregularities, 79 in all, some of which are ambiguous (see Table 4); the budget headings have not been entered in a consistent format and there are 46 codes for method of detection, some of which are again ambiguous (see Table 5). 
Obstaja preveč opisov za vrste goljufij in nepravilnosti, saj jih je skupaj kar 79 in so nekateri nejasni (glej Tabelo 4); proračunske postavke niso vpisane v enotni obliki in obstaja 46 oznak za metode odkrivanja, od katerih so prav tako nekatere nejasne (glej Tabelo 5).
Rationalisation and simplification of these descriptions would facilitate meaningful interpretation. 
Z racionalizacijo in poenostavitvijo teh opisov bi omogočili razumljivo razlago.
Type of irregularity Fictitious use or processing False or falsified commercial documents Inexact quantity False or falsified request for aid Fictitious movement Variation in quality or content Other cases of irregular documents Other irregularities Trafficking in withdrawn or stockpiled products Falsified customs documents Change of destination Non arrival at final destination Failure to respect other conditions Situation as at 31 December 2002. 
Vrsta nepravilnosti Fiktivna uporaba ali obdelava Lažni ali ponarejeni dokumenti Netočna količina Lažna ali ponarejena vloga za pomoč Fiktivna selitev Odstopanje v kakovosti ali količini Drugi primeri nepravilnih dokumentov Druge nepravilnosti Trgovanje z umaknjenimi proizvodi ali zalogami Ponarejena carinska dokumentacija Sprememba destinacije Neprispetje na destinacijo Niso bili izpolnjeni drugi pogoji Tabela 4 Vrste nepravilnosti Vrednost prijavljene nepravilnosti (v milijonih eurov) 984 379 270 208 201 169 148 120 97 91 91 74 71 Odstotek od skupne prijavljene vrednosti 23 9 6 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 Kumulativni odstotek 23 32 38 43 48 52 55 58 60 62 64 66 68 Stanje na dan 31. decembra 2002.
Table 5 Detection methods Value of irregularities reported (million euro) Detection method Percentage of total reported Cumulative percentage Documentary checks Judicial enquiry National fiscal control Routine control Accounting control EU initiative 1 137 950 253 237 180 153 126 123 92 90 85 27 27 22 49 6 55 6 60 4 64 4 68 3 71 3 74 2 76 2 78 2 80 2 82 Judicial enquiry Interservice collaboration Laboratory analysis of samples National customs control Control on the premises of the beneficiary Other 81 Situation as at 31 December 2002. 
Metoda odkrivanja Kontrola dokumentov Sodna poizvedba Državni davčni nadzor Redni nadzor Računovodski nadzor Pobuda EU Tabela 5 Metode odkrivanja Vrednost prijavljenih nepravilnosti (v milijonih eurov) Odstotek od vseh prijavljenih nepravilnosti 27 22 6 6 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 Kumulativni odstotek 27 49 55 60 64 68 71 74 76 78 80 82 Sodna poizvedba Medresorsko sodelovanje Laboratorijska analiza vzorcev Državni carinski nadzor Kontrola v prostorih upravičenca Drugo 81 1 137 950 253 237 180 153 126 123 92 90 85 Stanje na dan 31. decembra 2002.
Source: OLAF ECR database of irregularities reported under Regulation (EEC) No 595/91. 
Vir: OLAF, zbirka podatkov ECR o nepravilnostih, prijavljenih v skladu z Uredbo 595/91.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/13 58. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/13 58.
The Court also found that there were significant errors in the data recorded in the ECR and even the absence of financial data of any kind for 91 cases (see paragraph 25). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da podatki, evidentirani v ECR, vsebujejo večje napake in da za 91 primerov celo ni nobenih finančnih podatkov (glej odstavek 25).
The ECR records the identities of persons consulting the database and the number of times it has been consulted. 
ECR evidentira identiteto oseb, ki uporabijo zbirko podatkov, in število uporab zbirke.
From October 2001 to September 2002 there were 11 direct consultations by Commission Directorates-General. 
Od oktobra leta 2001 do septembra leta 2002 so zbirko enajstkrat neposredno uporabili generalni direktorati Komisije.
OLAF, however, has not carried out an evaluation of the use of the ECR data to determine whether or not it has provided useful information and has thus contributed to the fight against fraud. 
Vendar pa OLAF ni ocenil uporabe podatkov ECR, zato da bi ugotovil, ali je zbirka omogočila dostop do uporabnih podatkov, in s tem prispevala k boju proti goljufijam.
The Commission is required to study the information of which it has been notified and to inform Member StatesŐ representatives (meeting in the EAGGF Committee (1)) of any conclusions it intends to draw from them (2). 
Komisija mora preučiti podatke, o katerih je obveščena, in obvestiti predstavnike držav članic (sestanek v Odboru EKUJS (1)) o kakršnih koli sklepih, ki naj bi jih sprejela na podlagi teh podatkov (2).
Although some information has been provided to the ÔIrregularities GroupŐ (3), neither OLAF nor its predecessor UCLAF has made such a report to the EAGGF Committee (4). 
Čeprav je „Skupina za nepravilnosti“ (3) prejela podatke, nista niti OLAF niti njegov predhodnik UCLAF o tem poročala Odboru EKUJS (4).
The blacklist 61. 
Črna lista 61.
Member States are required to notify the Commission of the identity of operators who have committed irregularities exceeding 100 000 euro over a period of one year, together with details of the measures taken against those operators. 
Države članice morajo obvestiti Komisijo o identiteti gospodarskih subjektov, ki so zagrešili nepravilnost v znesku, ki presega 100 000 EUR v obdobju enega leta, in ji sporočiti podrobne podatke o ukrepih, sprejetih proti tem subjektom.
Member States have in general considered it impossible effectively to exclude entities found to have been involved in irregular or fraudulent operations from claiming further payments (e.g. the business can be transferred to another legal entity with the same shareholders etc). 
Države članice so na splošno menile, da je iz nadaljnjih plačil nemogoče učinkovito izključiti subjekte, za katere se je ugotovilo, da so vpleteni v nepravilnosti ali goljufije (na primer, podjetja se lahko preoblikujejo v drugo pravno osebo z istimi delničarji itd.).
Only six Member States have ever notified a company or individual under these arrangements (see also Special Report No 8/98, paragraphs 4.12 to 4.14 (5)). 
Le šest držav članic je do zdaj prijavilo podjetje ali posameznika v skladu s temi ureditvami (glej tudi Posebno poročilo št. 8/98, odstavki 4.12 do 4.14 (5)).
Comments received from Member States visited indicated that the greatest hindrance to the regulation was the fact that placing a company or individual on the blacklist may leave them open to legal redress and possible damages. 
Pripombe, prejete od obiskanih držav članic, so pokazale, da je bila največja ovira za to ureditev dejstvo, da bi bila lahko z uvrstitvijo podjetja ali posameznika na črno listo proti njim uporabljena pravna sredstva in bi lahko utrpeli škodo.
Until fraud is proven in a court of law (often a very lengthy process) it is uncertain whether a Member State can itself legally notify the names of companies and or individuals. 
Dokler goljufija ni dokazana na sodišču (kar je pogosto zelo dolgotrajen postopek), ni gotovo, ali lahko država članica sama zakonito prijavi imena podjetij ali posameznikov.
(1) The EAGGF (European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund) Committee and Irregularities Group are advisory bodies to the Commission. 
(1) Odbor EKUJS (Evropski kmetijski usmerjevalni in jamstveni sklad) in skupina za nepravilnosti sta svetovalna organa Komisije.
They are chaired by a Commission official and consist of representatives from Member States. 
Predseduje jima uradnik Komisije, sestavljajo pa ju predstavniki držav članic.
(2) Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991. 
(2) Člen 2(3) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 595/91 z dne 4. marca 1991.
(3) Group ÔIrregularites and mutual assistance, agricultural productsŐ, Regulations (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991 (OJ L 67, 14.3.1991, p. 
(3) Skupina „Nepravilnosti in vzajemna pomoč, kmetijski proizvodi“, uredbi (EGS) št. 595/91 z dne 4. marca 1991 (UL L 67, 14.3.1991, str.
11) and (EC) No 515/97 of 13 March 1997 (OJ L 83, 25.3.1997, p. 
11) in (ES) št. 515/97 z dne 13. marca 1997 (UL L 83, 25.3.1997, str.
(4) Irregularities and Mutual Assistance - Agricultural Products, Regulations (EEC) No 595/91 and (EC) No 515/97. 
(4) Nepravilnosti in vzajemna pomoč – kmetijski proizvodi, uredbi (EGS) št. 595/91 in (ES) št.
(5) OJ C 230, 22.7.1998, p. 
(5) UL C 230, 22.7.1998, str.
Recording of debts 63. 
Knjiženje dolgov 63.