natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This exercise consisted of short, fo‐ cused, on‐site assessments by external experts following a consistent meth‐ odology. 
Spremljanje je potekalo v obliki kratkih in osredoto‐ čenih ocenjevanj na kraju samem, ki so jih v skladu z dosledno metodologijo izvedli zunanji strokovnjaki.
The ROM assessments looked at many aspects of project imple‐ mentation on the basis of five criteria: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, potential impact and likely sustainabil‐ ity. 
V okviru spremljanja, usmerjenega k rezulta‐ tom, so bili preverjeni številni vidiki izvajanja projektov, in sicer na osnovi petih meril: ustreznosti, učinkovitosti, uspešnosti, potencialnega učinka in pričakovane finančne vzdržnosti.
However, the assessments did not focus specifically on the added value of the grants. 
Ven‐ dar se ocene niso posebej osredoto‐ čale na dodano vrednost nepovratnih sredstev.
Regarding the results of the ROMs, it was not clear whether the financial institution or the EU delega‐ tion was expected to take action on the conclusions and recommenda‐ tions. 
Pri rezultatih spremljanja, usmerjenega k rezultatom, ni jasno, ali bi naj na podlagi ugotovitev in pripo‐ ročil ukrepala finančna institucija ali delegacija EU.
Projects supported by the ITF, however, were not subject to ROM. 
Projekti, financirani iz skrbniškega sklada EU‐Afrika za infra‐ strukturo, niso bili zajeti v spremljanje, usmerjeno k rezultatom.
The intended benefits of blending grants and loans have not been fully achieved so far 38 The Court assessed the extent to which the intended benefits of blend‐ ing have been achieved. 
Načrtovane koristi kombi‐ niranja nepovratnih sred‐ stev in posojil doslej še niso bile v celoti dosežene 38 Sodišče je ocenilo, v kolikšni meri so bile dosežene načrtovane koristi kombiniranja.
These include mobilising additional non‐grant fi‐ nancing, being involved in the formu‐ lation of policies, having an impact on the way projects are set up and managed, improving donor coordina‐ tion and enhancing the visibility of European development cooperation aid (see paragraph 4). 
Te zajemajo mobilizacijo dodatnega financiranja, ki ni v obliki nepovratnih sredstev, sodelovanje pri oblikovanju politik, vpliv na način vzpostavitve in upravljanja projektov, izboljšanje usklajevanja donatorjev in krepitev prepoznavnosti evropske pomoči za razvojno sodelovanje (glej odstavek 4).
The need for a grant to enable the loan to be contracted was demonstrated for only half of the projects examined 39 Projects that received support from the regional investment facilities also attracted significant funding from non‐European financial institutions as well as from beneficiaries. 
Le pri polovici projektov so bila nepovratna sredstva dokazano potrebna za prido‐ bitev posojila 39 Projekti, ki so prejeli podporo v okviru regionalnih naložbenih instrumentov, so prav tako pritegnili znatno financi‐ ranje neevropskih finančnih institucij ter upravičencev.
For the sample of projects examined by the Court, the European financial institu‐ tions together provided 45 % of the total investment costs, some 20 % was raised by non‐European financial insti‐ tutions and 25 % from own contribu‐ tions from beneficiaries. 
V vzorcu projektov, ki ga je preučilo Sodišče, so evropske finančne institucije skupaj krile 45 % skupnih stroškov naložb, 20 % so pri‐ spevale neevropske finančne instituci‐ je, 25 % pa je bilo zbranih z last‐ nimi prispevki upravičencev.
The latter is good practice in order to ensure that the beneficiaries take responsibility for the investments. 
Slednje je dobra praksa, da se zagotovi, da upravičenci prevzamejo odgovornost za naložbe.
Funding was thus provided, in the main, by institutional development banks and private sector lending has been low to date. 
Sredstva so tako večinoma zagotovile institucionalne razvojne banke, raven posojil zasebnega sektor‐ ja pa je bila doslej nizka.
Observations 20 40 The ITF provided interest rate subsidies with the aim of making the financial institution loan concessional according to IMF criteria (see paragraph 29). The grant therefore enabled the invest‐ ment to take place. 
Opažanja 20 40 Skrbniški sklad EU‐Afrika za infrastruk‐ turo je zagotavljal subvencije obrest‐ nih mer z namenom, da bi posojila finančnih institucij dosegla raven koncesivnosti, ki ustreza merilom Mednarodnega denarnega sklada (glej odstavek 29).
At the end of 2013, 14 of the 71 projects for which ITF sup‐ port was committed had this objec‐ tive. 
Ob koncu leta 2013 je imelo ta cilj 14 od 71 projektov, ki jim je bila dodeljena pomoč iz skrbniškega sklada EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo.
They represented 217 million euro out of a total of 494 million euro com‐ mitted by the ITF. 
Ti projekti so predstavljali 217 milijonov EUR od skupno 494 milijonov EUR, dodeljenih v okviru omenjenega sklada.
41 The regional investment facilities also funded a significant number of activi‐ ties during the pre‐investment phase. 
41 S pomočjo regionalnih naložbenih instrumentov se je financiralo tudi precejšnje število dejavnosti v fazi pred izvedbo naložbe.
These were mostly studies, such as feasibility studies, necessary for set‐ ting up an investment project and for which financial institutions in general had only limited financial resources available. 
Večinoma je šlo za študije, kot so npr. študije izvedlji‐ vosti, ki so potrebne za vzpostavitev naložbenega projekta in za katere so imele finančne institucije v splošnem na voljo le omejena finančna sredstva.
These projects accounted for 46 % of the ITF projects examined, 20 % of the NIF projects examined and 70 % of all WBIF projects21. 
Tovrstni projekti so predstavljali 46 % vseh preučenih projektov v okviru skrbniškega sklada EU‐Afrika za infra‐ strukturo, 20 % preučenih projektov v okviru naložbenega instrumenta za sosedstvo in 70 % vseh projektov na‐ ložbenega okvira za zahodni Balkan21.
The vast majority of these studies led or will most likely lead to actual investment projects and can therefore, at least to some extent, be said to have facilitated the investment financed by a loan (see Box 5 for an example). 
Velika večina teh študij je vodila k de‐ janskim naložbenim projektom ali pa se bo to zelo verjetno zgodilo, zato je zanje vsaj do neke mere mogoče trditi, da so spodbudile naložbe, financirane s posojili (za primer glej okvir 5).
21 This corresponds to 18 % of ITF committed amounts, 10 % of NIF committed amounts and 35 % of WBIF committed amounts. 
21 To ustreza 18 % sredstev, dodeljenih v okviru skrbniškega sklada EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo, 10 % sredstev, dodeljenih v okviru naložbenega instrumenta za sosedstvo, in 35 % sredstev, dodeljenih v okviru naložbenega okvira za zahodni Balkan.
ITF project — Maputo Airport The ITF financed consultancy services during the preparation phase of works at the international airport in Maputo (Mozambique). 
Projekt skrbniškega sklada EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo – letališče v Maputu Skrbniški sklad EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo je financiral svetovalne storitve v pripravljalni fazi del na mednaro‐ dnem letališču v Maputu v Mozambiku.
The planned investment concerns the rehabilitation and improvement of the runways, taxiways and airfield ground lighting. 
Načrtovana naložba zadeva obnovo in izboljšanje vzletno‐pristajalnih stez, voznih stez in talne osvetljave letališča.
The consultancy services cost 0,6 million euro and consisted of a feasi‐ bility study for the design of the project and the preparation of the tender process. 
Strošek svetovalnih storitev je znašal 0,6 milijona EUR, storitve pa so zajemale študijo izvedljivosti za zasnovo projekta in pripravo postopka za oddajo javnih naročil.
Good practice of technical assistance during the pre-investments phase leveraging the financing for an investment The technical assistance successfully prepared the project. 
Dobra praksa zagotavljanja tehnične pomoči v fazi pred izvedbo naložbe, ki pritegne sredstva za naložbo Tehnična pomoč je prispevala k uspešni pripravi projekta.
The investment cost of 52 million euro is financed by loans provided by European financial institutions. 
Stroški naložbe v višini 52 milijonov EUR se financi‐ rajo s posojili evropskih finančnih institucij.
Construction work will start in the second half of 2014. 
Gradbena dela se bodo pričela v drugi polovici leta 2014.
42 For 15 of the 30 projects examined by the Court, there was no convinc‐ ing analysis to show that a grant was necessary in order for the loan to be contracted (see Annex IX). 
42 Za 15 od 30 projektov, ki jih je preučilo Sodišče, ni bilo prepričljive analize, ki bi dokazala, da so bila nepovra‐ tna sredstva potrebna za pridobitev posojila (glej Prilogo IX).
Depend‐ ing on the case concerned, there were indications that the investments would also have been made without the grant: (a) In one case, the purpose of the grant was to render the loan con‐ cessional but the beneficiary coun‐ try was no longer bound by the IMF rules on concessional lending; Box 5 
V nekaterih primerih so obstajali znaki, na podlagi katerih je mogoče sklepati, da bi bile naložbe izvedene tudi brez nepovrat‐ nih sredstev: (a) v enem primeru je bil namen do‐ delitve nepovratnih sredstev dose‐ či koncesivnost posojila, vendar za državo upravičenko pravila Medna‐ rodnega denarnega sklada o ugo‐ dnih posojilih niso več veljala; Okvir 5
Observations 21 (b) In two cases, a significant propor‐ tion of the investment was di‐ rectly financed by the EDF. A grant was therefore not necessary to render the financing package concessional; (c) In four cases, the grant was mar‐ ginal compared to the total invest‐ ment cost and did not significantly increase the overall financial prof‐ itability of the project; (d) In one case, the project was fi‐ nancially viable even without the grant; (e) In one case, the government was very committed to making a high profile investment with environ‐ mental benefits even though the financial profitability was very low. 
Opažanja 21 (b) v dveh primerih je bil znaten del naložbe neposredno financiran iz Evropskega razvojnega skla‐ da, zato dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev ni bila potrebna, da bi bil finančni paket skladen s pravili o koncesivnosti; (c) v štirih primerih so bila dodeljena nepovratna sredstva v primerjavi s skupnimi stroški naložbe nezna‐ tna in niso bistveno povečala splo‐ šne finančne donosnosti projekta; (d) v enem primeru je bil projekt s fi‐ nančnega vidika izvedljiv tudi brez dodelitve nepovratnih sredstev; (e) v enem primeru je bila vlada trdno odločena izvesti pomembno na‐ ložbo s okoljskimi koristmi, čeprav je bila njena finančna donosnost zelo nizka.
Awarding a grant was not neces‐ sary in order for the government to commit to covering possible future losses; (f) In five cases, the grant served mainly to help the financial in‐ stitutions to propose a financial package that was likely to be ac‐ cepted by the governments of the beneficiary countries, for instance by matching the other financiers’ offers for the projects concerned; (g) One case involved the creation of a sub‐facility for providing credit‐enhancement support. 
Dodelitev sredstev za to, da bi se vlada zavezala h kritju morebitnih izgub v prihodnosti, ni bila potrebna; (f) v petih primerih je bil glavni namen dodelitve nepovratnih sredstev pomagati finančnim institucijam pri pripravi predloga za finančni paket, za katerega bi bilo verjetno, da bi ga vlade držav upravičenk sprejele, npr. z obliko‐ vanjem ponudb, ki so enakovredne ponudbam drugih ponudnikov financiranja za zadevne projekte; (g) v enem primeru je bil za zago‐ tavljanje podpore za izboljšanje kreditne kakovosti vzpostavljen podinstrument.
The sub‐facility consisted of two identi‐ cal products one of which was able to operate successfully without any grant funding. 
Podinstrument sta sestavljala dva identična produkta, od katerih je lahko eden uspešno deloval brez nepovratnih sredstev.
The potential for Commission involvement in the formulation of policies and for having an impact on the way projects were set up and managed was not fully exploited 43 Grants from regional investment facili‐ ties often have a positive impact on the way projects are set up and man‐ aged (see paragraph 3). 
Možnosti za sodelovanje Komisije pri oblikovanju politik in vplivanje na način vzpostavitve in upravljanja projektov niso bile v celoti izkoriščene 43 Nepovratna sredstva v okviru regio‐ nalnih naložbenih instrumentov imajo pogosto pozitiven učinek na način vzpostavitve in upravljanja projektov (glej odstavek 3).
For the 30 pro‐ jects examined by the Court, this was achieved in various ways depending on the project: (a) In 11 cases, the grant made it pos‐ sible to introduce project compo‐ nents that would most probably not have been financed otherwise. 
Pri 30 projektih, ki jih je preučilo Sodišče, je bilo to dose‐ ženo na različne načine, odvisno od projekta: (a) v 11 primerih je bilo zaradi nepo‐ vratnih sredstev mogoče uvesti elemente projekta, ki sicer naj‐ verjetneje ne bi bili financirani.
Examples of such components included useful technical assis‐ tance and introducing a pro‐poor emphasis for the project (see Box 6 for an example); (b) In three cases, the Commission was directly involved in setting up the project because it made the project proposal, financed the fea‐ sibility study and/or co‐financed the project through a direct contribution; (c) In two cases, the grant financed feasibility studies, which were an important element for deciding on the nature and scope of invest‐ ment projects; (d) In one case, the grant enabled the project to have a significantly wider scope. 
Primeri tovrstnih elementov zaje‐ majo koristno tehnično pomoč in usmeritev projekta v korist revnim (za primer glej okvir 6); (b) v treh primerih je Komisija nepo‐ sredno sodelovala pri vzpostavitvi projekta, saj je pripravila predlog zanj, financirala študijo izvedlji‐ vosti in/ali sofinancirala projekt z neposrednim prispevkom; (c) v dveh primerih so se z nepovrat‐ nimi sredstvi financirale študije izvedljivosti, ki so bile pomemben element pri odločanju o naravi in obsegu naložbenih projektov; (d) v enem primeru so nepovratna sredstva omogočila bistveno širši obseg projekta.
Observations 22 ITF project — Lake Victoria Water and Sanitation — Kampala Water The project concerned the enhancement of the financial and operational capacity of the National Water and Sewerage Corporation in Kampala (Uganda). 
Opažanja 22 Projekt skrbniškega sklada EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo – voda in sanitarna oskrba ob Viktorijinem jezeru – Kampala Water Projekt je zajemal okrepitev finančne in operativne zmogljivosti družbe National Water and Sewerage Corpo‐ ration v Kampali (Uganda), zadolžene za vodovod in kanalizacijo.
It aimed at increasing the reliability of and access to water supply services for the population of Kampala and the surrounding areas. 
Njegov namen je bil izboljšati zanesljivost storitev oskrbe z vodo in dostop do teh storitev za prebivalce Kampale in sosednjih območij.
The total project cost was 212 million euro. 
Skupni stroški projekta so znašali 212 milijonov EUR.
The ITF financed technical assistance worth 8 million euro for project preparation, as well as an interest rate subsidy of 14 million euro, which ensured a concessionality level of 35 % as required by the IMF. 
Iz skrbniškega sklada EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo so se financirale tehnič‐ na pomoč v višini 8 milijonov EUR za pripravo projekta in subvencije obrestnih mer v višini 14 milijonov EUR, s čimer je bila dosežena raven koncesivnosti 35 %, ki jo zahteva Mednarodni denarni sklad.
Good practice on impact on the set-up of the project The grant brought about social benefits through the pro‐poor focus of the project. 
Dobra praksa v zvezi z vplivanjem na način vzpostavitve projekta Dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev je prinesla družbene koristi zaradi usmerjenosti projekta v korist revnim.
In particular, the project improved the supply of drinking water and basic sanitation in the poorer areas around Kampala. 
S projektom sta se zlasti izboljšali oskrba s pitno vodo in osnovna sanitarna oskrba na revnejših območjih okoli Kampale.
The grant benefits were transferred to the final beneficiaries by providing water to the poorest households at reduced rates. 
Koristi nepovratnih sredstev so se z zagotavljanjem vode najrevnejšim gospodinjstvom po znižani ceni prenesle na končne upravičence.
Without the grant funding, the project would have focused solely on richer areas. 
Brez nepovratnih sredstev bi bil projekt osredotočen izključno na bogatejša območja.
44 In the 13 other projects examined by the Court, however, there was no evidence that the contributions from the regional investment facilities had any influence on the way projects were set up. 
44 Pri 13 ostalih projektih, ki jih je preuči‐ lo Sodišče, ni bilo najti dokazov o tem, da so prispevki regionalnih nalož‐ benih instrumentov na kakršen koli način vplivali na način vzpostavitve projektov.
45 Of the projects examined by the Court, there were 10 cases where the grant has also had a positive impact on the policy of the beneficiary country in the sector concerned. 
45 Od vseh projektov, ki jih je preučilo So‐ dišče, so nepovratna sredstva v desetih primerih pozitivno vplivala tudi na politiko države upravičenke v zadev‐ nem sektorju.
In most of these cases, the grant reinforced an already existing policy dialogue with the Com‐ mission in the sector in which the pro‐ jects were implemented. 
V večini teh primerov je dodelitev sredstev okrepila že obstoječ politični dialog s Komisijo v sektorju, v katerem so se izvajali projekti.
The potential of policy dialogue was greater when the grant actually mobilised additional financing (see paragraph 42). 
Poten‐ cial političnega dialoga je bil večji, ka‐ dar so nepovratna sredstva omogočila mobilizacijo dodatnega financiranja (glej odstavek 42).
46 In the 20 other projects, there was no evidence that grants had a wider impact on policy in the sector in which support was provided. 
46 Pri preostalih 20 projektih ni bilo najti dokazov o tem, da bi imela dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev širši vpliv na politiko v sektorju, v katerem se je za‐ gotavljala podpora.
When the fi‐ nancial institution attached conditions to its loans, in most cases they were directly related to the implementation of the project. 
Kadar je finančna institucija določila pogoje za posojila, so bili ti večinoma neposredno pove‐ zani z izvajanjem projekta.
The Commission was not involved in monitoring and assess‐ ing compliance and in most cases did not require the regional investment facilities to attach conditions to the grants that related to the policies of the sectors concerned. 
Komisija ni sodelovala pri spremljanju in ocenjeva‐ nju skladnosti ter v večini primerov ni zahtevala, da se dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev v okviru regionalnih nalož‐ benih instrumentov pogoji z izpolnje‐ vanjem pogojev v zvezi s politikami v zadevnih sektorjih.
Observations 23 Blending enhanced donor coordination but the visibility of EU funding has been limited to date Donor coordination 47 The regional investment facilities encourage coordination between development partners by providing a framework for the financial institu‐ tions to meet and discuss their invest‐ ment plans and to coordinate their efforts in a way which goes beyond the projects themselves. 
Opažanja 23 S kombiniranjem se je okre‐ pilo usklajevanje donatorjev, vendar prepoznavnost finan‐ ciranja EU ostaja omejena Usklajevanje donatorjev 47 Regionalni naložbeni instrumenti spodbujajo usklajevanje med razvojni‐ mi partnerji, in sicer tako, da zagotav‐ ljajo okvir, v katerem se finančne insti‐ tucije sestajajo, razpravljajo o svojih naložbenih načrtih in usklajujejo svoja prizadevanja na način, ki ne zadeva le samih projektov.
This is good development practice, in line with the Paris Declaration principles22. 48 Of the 38 ITF and 73 NIF investment projects23 for which the executive boards committed grants by the end of 2013, 26 and 52 projects received loans from more than one source. 
To je dobra razvojna praksa, ki je skladna z načeli Pariške deklaracije.22 48 Od 38 naložbenih projektov skrbniške‐ ga sklada EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo in 73 naložbenih projektov naložbenega instrumenta za sosedstvo23, za katere sta izvršilna odbora odobrila nepovra‐ tna sredstva do konca leta 2013, je 26 oziroma 52 projektov prejelo nepovrat‐ na sredstva iz več virov.
49 Blending enabled the funding of large projects by combining different sources of funding within individual projects. 
49 S kombiniranjem virov sredstev znotraj posameznih projektov je bilo omo‐ gočeno financiranje velikih projektov.
At the end of 2013, the ITF and the NIF committed support to, respectively, 22 and 26 investment projects that received loans of a total value of more than 100 million euro. 
Do konca leta 2013 je skrbniški sklad EU‐Afrika za infrastrukturo dodelil podporo 22 naložbenim projektom, naložbeni instrument za sosedstvo pa 26 naložbenim projektom, ki so pridobili posojila v skupni vrednosti več kot 100 milijonov EUR.
Such projects would have been dif‐ ficult to finance by a single financial institution. 
Sredstva za tovrstne projekte bi težko zagotovila ena sama finančna institucija.
50 The Mutual Reliance Initiative (MRI) es‐ tablished by three European financial institutions further enhanced coop‐ eration and coordination. 
50 Pobuda vzajemnega zaupanja (Mutual Reliance Initiative – MRI), ki so jo obliko‐ vale tri evropske finančne institucije, je dodatno okrepila sodelovanje in usklajevanje.
The MRI is a formal framework set up in 2009 by AFD, EIB and KfW with the purpose of increasing effectiveness in co‐financ‐ ing development projects. 
Pobuda vzajemnega zaupanja je formalni okvir, ki so ga leta 2009 vzpostavile Agence Française de Développement, Evropska investicijska banka in Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau z namenom izboljšanja uspešnosti so‐ financiranja razvojnih projektov.
Its main features are the delegation of most tasks to the lead financier of an opera‐ tion and the mutual recognition of procedures. 
Njeni glavni elementi so prenos večine nalog na vodilnega ponudnika financiranja ukrepov in vzajemno priznavanje po‐ stopkov.
This reduces transaction costs for the beneficiary, which is in line with aid effectiveness principles. 
S tem se za upravičenca zniža‐ jo transakcijski stroški, kar je v skladu z načeli uspešnosti pomoči.
However, decisions and contracting remain with each financial institution. 
Vendar pa odločanje in sklepanje pogodb ostaja‐ ta v pristojnosti posamezne finančne institucije.
Visibility of EU funding 51 The regulatory framework of the regional investment facilities stipulates general visibility rules24. 
Prepoznavnost financiranja EU 51 Regulativni okvir regionalnih nalož‐ benih instrumentov določa splošna načela glede prepoznavnosti24.
The main prin‐ ciple is that the lead financier ensures EU visibility which is at least equiva‐ lent to its own visibility. 
Glavno načelo je, da vodilni ponudnik financi‐ ranja zagotovi prepoznavnost EU, ki je vsaj enakovredna njegovi lastni prepo‐ znavnosti.
Contractual arrangements relating to individual projects generally also stipulate the need for adequate visibility25 although they fail to provide concrete rules or instructions. 
Pogodbeni dogovori glede posameznih projektov v splošnem prav tako določajo potrebo po zago‐ tavljanju ustrezne prepoznavnosti25, vendar ne navajajo konkretnih pravil ali navodil.
The Court’s examination of individual projects and the survey of EU delegations showed that the finan‐ cial institutions have so far provided only limited visibility of EU grants in blended projects. 
Preučitev posameznih pro‐ jektov in raziskava med delegacijami EU, ki ju je izvedlo Sodišče, sta pokaza‐ li, da so finančne institucije doslej za‐ gotavljale le omejeno prepoznavnost nepovratnih sredstev EU pri projektih, financiranih s kombiniranjem virov sredstev.