natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A major recipient of ENI funding 07 Morocco receives more EU development support than any other North-African country, except Tunisia, and is one of the main beneficiaries of international development aid. 
Pomemben prejemnik sredstev evropskega instrumenta sosedstva 07 Maroko, ki prejema več razvojne podpore EU kot katera koli druga severnoafriška država razen Tunizije, je eden od glavnih prejemnikov mednarodne razvojne pomoči.
The EU is its biggest donor, providing 25.2 % of official development assistance (see Figure 2). 
EU je njegova največja donatorka, saj zagotavlja 25,2 % uradne razvojne pomoči (glej sliko 2).
Figure 2 Đ Official Development Assistance (ODA) in Morocco in 2017, main donors ($ million) Source: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Document conjoint UE-Maroc sur le renforcement des relations bilatrales/ Statut Avanc (13653/08). 8 EU France United Arab Emirates Germany Kuwait Ja p an Arab Fund United States 18 141 127 52 150 36 0 200 400 600 800 ODA grants ODA loans 71 170 240 434 389 368 35 471 4 
Slika 2 – Uradna razvojna pomoč (URP) v Maroku leta 2017, glavni donatorji (v milijonih USD) 8 EU Francija Združeni arabski emirati Nemčija Kuvajt Japonska Arabski sklad ZDA 18 141 127 52 71 170 240 434 389 368 35 471 150 36 0 Nepovratna sredstva v okviru URP 600 800 Posojila v okviru URP 200 400 Vir: Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj 08 Poleg donatorjev uradne razvojne pomoči so v Maroku dejavni tudi drugi razvojni akterji.
The official statistics of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development show for example that the World Bank (WB) and the African Development Bank (ADB) are important donors in the sectors of infrastructure projects and good governance, health and social protection. 
Iz uradnih statističnih podatkov Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj je na primer razvidno, da sta Svetovna banka in Afriška razvojna banka pomembni donatorki v sektorjih infrastrukturnih projektov in dobrega upravljanja, zdravstva in socialne zaščite.
09 The European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) is the key financial instrument supporting the CommissionŐs cooperation with Morocco. 
09 Evropski instrument sosedstva je ključni finančni instrument, s katerim se podpira sodelovanje Komisije z Marokom.
The Commission programmes the EUŐs bilateral support for a period of seven years. 
Komisija pripravlja programe dvostranske podpore EU za sedemletna obdobja.
The overall amount committed fell from Ű1 431 million for 2007-2013 to Ű1 399 million for 2014-2020 (see Figure 3). 
Skupni znesek prevzetih obveznosti se je s 1 431 milijonov EUR za obdobje 2007–2013 znižal na 1 399 milijonov EUR za obdobje 2014–2020 (glej sliko 3).
The main priority sectors stated in the Single Support Framework (SSF) for 2014-2017 were equitable access to basic social services, support for democratic governance, the rule of law and mobility, and jobs, sustainable, inclusive growth. 
Glavni prednostni sektorji, navedeni v enotnem okviru podpore za obdobje 2014–2017, so bili pravičen dostop do osnovnih socialnih storitev, podpora demokratičnemu upravljanju, pravna država, mobilnost in delovna mesta ter trajnostna in vključujoča rast.
Figure 3 Đ Bilateral assistance commitments in North Africa 9 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 Libya Algeria ENPI 2007-2013 Egypt ENI 2014-2020 EN(P)I min. commitments in Ű billion Morocco Tunisia Source: European Commission. 10 Morocco is one of the biggest beneficiaries of bilateral ENI programmes in North Africa. 
Slika 3 – Obveznosti v zvezi z dvostransko pomočjo v Severni Afriki 9 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 Libija Alžirija Evropski instrument sosedstva in partnerstva 2007–2013 Maroko Evropski instrument sosedstva 2014–2020 Tunizija Obveznosti v okviru evropskega instrumenta sosedstva (in partnerstva) v milijardah EUR Egipt Vir: Evropska komisija 10 Maroko je eden največjih prejemnikov sredstev iz dvostranskih programov evropskega instrumenta sosedstva v Severni Afriki.
From 2014 to 2018, the allocation for BS (see Box 1) resulted in contracts totalling Ű562 million and payments totalling almost Ű206 million (see Annex II). 
V obdobju 2014–2018 so bile na podlagi dodeljenih sredstev za proračunsko podporo (glej okvir 1) sklenjene pogodbe v skupni vrednosti 562 milijonov EUR in izvršena plačila v skupni vrednosti skoraj 206 milijonov EUR (glej Prilogo II).
On average, BS constitutes 75 % of annual EU expenditure for Morocco. 
Proračunska podpora v povprečju pomeni 75 % letnih odhodkov EU za Maroko.
Morocco also receives additional funding under several thematic programmes and instruments (see Annex III) and EU support is also channelled via financial institutions and trust funds. 
Maroko poleg tega prejema dodatna finančna sredstva v okviru več tematskih programov in instrumentov (glej Prilogo III), podpora EU pa se zagotavlja tudi prek finančnih institucij in skrbniških skladov.
10 Box 1 The budget support modality According to the Commission, BS is an effective means of delivering aid to support reforms and sustainable development goals. 
Okvir 1 Proračunska podpora kot oblika pomoči Po mnenju Komisije je proračunska podpora uspešen način zagotavljanja pomoči v podporo reformam in ciljem trajnostnega razvoja.
The Commission considers it to be a vector of change for improving public financial management, macroeconomic stability, sustainable and inclusive growth and the fight against corruption and fraud, and promoting sector reforms, human rights, democratic values and gender equality. 
Meni, da je dejavnik sprememb za boljše upravljanje javnih financ, makroekonomsko stabilnost, trajnostno in vključujočo rast ter boj proti korupciji in goljufijam, pa tudi za spodbujanje sektorskih reform, človekovih pravic, demokratičnih vrednot in enakosti spolov.
BS involves dialogue, financial transfers to the national treasury account of the partner country, performance assessment and capacity development, based on partnership and mutual accountability. 
Proračunska podpora zajema dialog, prenos finančnih sredstev na nacionalne zakladniške račune partnerskih držav, oceno smotrnosti in razvijanje zmogljivosti na podlagi partnerstva in vzajemne odgovornosti.
The funds transferred are not earmarked for a specific purpose; it is therefore not possible to follow where and how they are used. 
Ker prenesena sredstva niso predvidena za specifičen namen, ni mogoče spremljati, za kaj se porabijo in kako.
Once the funds have been transferred, the partner country can use them in its normal budgetary process. 
10 Partnerska država lahko prenesena sredstva uporablja v okviru svojega običajnega proračunskega postopka.
BS is not provided to every country. 
Proračunska podpora se ne zagotavlja vsem državam.
Eligibility criteria have to be met before and during the programme and conditions need to be fulfilled before payments are made. 
Pred začetkom programa in med njegovim izvajanjem morajo biti izpolnjena merila za upravičenost, pred izvršitvijo plačil pa morajo biti izpolnjeni določeni pogoji.
To be eligible for BS, a country must have: o relevant, credible sectoral/national development strategies; o a stability-oriented macroeconomic policy; o a relevant, credible public financial management reform programme and o budget transparency and oversight (budget information must be made publicly available). 
Da je država upravičena do proračunske podpore, mora imeti: o ustrezne in verodostojne strategije sektorskega/nacionalnega razvoja, o v stabilnost usmerjeno makroekonomsko politiko, o ustrezen in verodostojen program reform upravljanja javnih financ ter o pregleden proračun in nadzor nad njim (proračunske informacije morajo biti javno dostopne).
BS is paid in fixed and variable tranches. 
Proračunska podpora se izplača v fiksnih in spremenljivih tranšah.
Fixed tranches have a fixed value, specified in advance within the financing agreement (contract between the beneficiary country and the Commission). 
Fiksne tranše imajo fiksno vrednost, ki je vnaprej določena v sporazumu o financiranju (sporazum med državo upravičenko in Komisijo).
They are disbursed in full (when all conditions are met) or not at all (if one or more conditions are not met). 
Izplačajo se v celoti (ko so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji) ali sploh ne (če ni izpolnjen eden ali več pogojev).
Variable tranches have a maximum value specified in advance in the financing agreement. 
Največja možna vrednost spremenljivih tranš se vnaprej določi v sporazumu o financiranju.
They are either disbursed in full or in part with the amount disbursed being based on the performance achieved in relation to pre-specified targets or designated performance indicators (provided that at the same time the general conditions are all met). 
Te tranše se izplačajo bodisi v celoti bodisi deloma, izplačani znesek pa temelji na doseženi smotrnosti glede na vnaprej določene ciljne vrednosti ali opredeljene kazalnike smotrnosti (če so izpolnjeni tudi vsi splošni pogoji).
This performance assessment is based on data to be provided by the beneficiary country defined in the financing agreement (sources of verification). 
Ta ocena smotrnosti temelji na podatkih, ki jih mora predložiti država upravičenka in so določeni v sporazumu o financiranju (viri preverjanja).
Source: The CommissionŐs Budget Support Guidelines, September 2017. 11 The EU Delegation in Rabat and the Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement negotiations are managing and implementing the programmes. 
Vir: Smernice Komisije za proračunsko podporo, september 2017 11 Za upravljanje in izvajanje programov sta odgovorna delegacija EU v Rabatu in Generalni direktorat za sosedstvo in širitvena pogajanja.
The European External Action Service (EEAS) and the EU Head of Delegation are responsible for the political dialogue. 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) in vodja delegacije EU sta odgovorna za politični dialog.
Bilateral relations challenged 12 The EU and Morocco have enjoyed long-standing good relations. However, the EU-Morocco partnership had been strained since 2015, when the General Court of the EU made the first series of rulings that Western Sahara was not a part of Morocco. 
Dvostranski odnosi na preizkušnji 12 EU in Maroko imata dolgoletne dobre odnose, vendar se je njuno partnerstvo skrhalo leta 2015, ko je Splošno sodišče EU sprejelo prvi niz odločb, da Zahodna Sahara ni del Maroka.
This meant that Western Sahara was not part of the fisheries and agriculture agreement between the EU and Morocco and could not benefit from the same tariff preferences. 
To je pomenilo, da Zahodna Sahara ni del sporazuma o ribištvu in kmetijstvu, ki sta ga sklenila EU in Maroko, in da zanjo ne morejo veljati enaki tarifni
The Western Sahara issue (see Box 2) put the EU-Morocco partnership under stress and Morocco suspended political dialogue. 11 
Vprašanje Zahodne Sahare (glej okvir 2) je zamajalo partnerstvo med EU in Marokom, ki je prekinil politični dialog.
13 Political dialogue is held at the level of the EEAS, the EU Head of Delegation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Morocco.The policy dialogue is held at sectoral level between the EU Delegation staff and the Moroccan authorities. 
13 Politični dialog poteka na ravni ESZD, vodje delegacije EU in maroškega ministrstva za zunanje zadeve. Dialog o politikah poteka na sektorski ravni, in sicer med osebjem delegacije EU in maroškimi organi.
Figure 4 explains the difference between political and policy dialogue. 
Na sliki 4 je pojasnjena razlika med političnim dialogom in dialogom o politikah.
Judgment by the General Court of the EU of 10 December 2015 (Case T-512/12). 
Sodba Splošnega sodišča EU z dne 10. decembra 2015 (zadeva T-512/12).
2012/497/EU: Council Decision, (OJ L 241, 7.9.2012, p. 
2012/497/EU: Sklep Sveta (UL L 241, 7.9.2012, str.
2). Judgment by the CJEU of 21 December 2016 (Case C-104/16 P). 
2). Sodba Sodišča EU z dne 21. decembra 2016 (zadeva C-104/16 P).
Judgment of the CJEU of 27 February 2018 (Case C-266/16). 
Sodba Sodišča EU z dne 27. februarja 2018 (zadeva C-266/16).
12 Box 2 Summary Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) 10 December 2015: The judgment of the General Court of the EU5 annulled the Decision6 on the implementation of the agricultural agreement in the territory of Western Sahara. 
11 Okvir 2 Povzetek sodb Sodišča Evropske unije 10. december 2015: S sodbo Splošnega sodišča EU5 je bil sklep6 o izvajanju kmetijskega sporazuma na ozemlju Zahodne Sahare razglašen za ničnega.
The judgment established that the agricultural agreement applied to Western Sahara, but that Western Sahara was not a part of Morocco, and that the Kingdom of Morocco was not the administering power. 
V njej je bilo ugotovljeno, da se kmetijski sporazum uporablja za Zahodno Saharo, da pa Zahodna Sahara ni del Maroka in da Kraljevina Maroko ni upravna oblast.
Before adopting the Decision, the Council should have ensured that the natural resources of the territory would not be exploited to the detriment of its inhabitants and their fundamental rights. 
Svet bi moral pred sprejetjem sklepa zagotoviti, da se naravni viri tega ozemlja ne izkoriščajo v škodo njegovih prebivalcev in v nasprotju z njihovimi temeljnimi pravicami.
21 December 20167: The CJEU annulled the judgment of 2015 and ruled that no trade or association agreement with Morocco could apply to the territory of Western Sahara, since Western Sahara was not part of Morocco. 
21. december 20167: Sodišče EU je razveljavilo sodbo iz leta 2015 in odločilo, da se noben trgovinski ali pridružitveni sporazum z Marokom ne more uporabljati za ozemlje Zahodne Sahare, saj ta ni del Maroka.
Accordingly, the CJEU stated that the people of Western Sahara should be viewed as a third party to the EU's relations with Morocco. 
V skladu s tem je navedlo, da je treba v odnosih med EU in Marokom ljudstvo Zahodne Sahare šteti za tretjega.
Therefore, as for any bilateral arrangement, the express consent of the people of the territory should be obtained. 
Kot pri vseh dvostranskih sporazumih je zato treba pridobiti izrecno soglasje ljudstva tega ozemlja.
February 20188: The CJEU held that, as Western Sahara did not form part of the Kingdom of Morocco, the waters adjacent to Western Sahara were not part of the Moroccan fishing zone referred to in the Fisheries Agreement. 
Februar 2018:8 Sodišče EU je menilo, da vode ob obali ozemlja Zahodne Sahare ne spadajo v maroško ribolovno cono iz sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju, saj Zahodna Sahara ni del Kraljevine Maroko.
First quarter 2019: The European Parliament and the Council approved an amendment to two protocols, for fisheries and agriculture. 
Prvo četrtletje leta 2019: Evropski parlament in Svet sta potrdila spremembo dveh protokolov o ribolovu in kmetijstvu.
The aim was to foster economic development in Western Sahara by treating its exports to the EU in the same way as exports from Morocco. 
Cilj je spodbuditi gospodarski razvoj v Zahodni Sahari, in sicer tako, da se izvoz iz Zahodne Sahare v EU obravnava enako kot izvoz iz Maroka.
May carry a political dimension (e.g. when difficult reforms are politically costly). 
Lahko ima politično razsežnost (npr. kadar je politična cena težavnih reform visoka).
Source: DEVCO Academy. 
Vir: akademija GD za mednarodno sodelovanje in razvoj
Audit scope and approach 14 This audit assessed the effectiveness of EU BS to Morocco for 2014-2018. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop 14 V tej reviziji je bila ocenjena uspešnost proračunske podpore EU Maroku v obdobju 2014–2018.
We asked the following questions: o Did the Commission and the EEAS choose the priority sectors appropriately and design the programmes well? o Did the Commission implement EU support appropriately in Morocco? o Were the objectives of EU support to Morocco achieved? 
Sodišče je postavilo naslednja vprašanja: o Ali sta Komisija in ESZD ustrezno izbrali prednostne sektorje in dobro oblikovali programe? o Ali je Komisija ustrezno izvajala podporo EU Maroku? o Ali so bili cilji podpore EU Maroku doseženi?
15 The audit covered the period from the official decision setting up the European Neighbourhood Instrument (1 January 2014) up to the end of 2018. 
15 Revizija je zajemala obdobje od uradne odločitve o vzpostavitvi evropskega instrumenta sosedstva (1. januar 2014) do konca leta 2018.
The audit focused on this period, as an external evaluation on BS to Morocco had already been carried out for the period 2005 to 2012 (published in 2014). 
Revizija je bila osredotočena na to obdobje, ker je bila v zvezi s proračunsko podporo Maroku v obdobju 2005–2012 že izvedena zunanja ocena (objavljena je bila leta 2014).
Furthermore, this period is in line with the ENI-programming period. 
Poleg tega se to obdobje ujema s programskim obdobjem evropskega instrumenta sosedstva.
Amounts contracted and paid for this period are material. 
Pomembni so zneski, za katere so bile sklenjene pogodbe ali ki so bili izplačani za to obdobje.
In addition, the Commission has not yet carried out a country evaluation covering support to Morocco. 
Poleg tega Komisija še ni opravila ocene države, ki bi zajemala podporo Maroku.
16 The audit was carried out from September 2018 to February 2019, covering health, social protection, justice and private sector development (PACC: Ôprogramme dŐappui  la croissance verte et la comptitivit au MarocŐ). 
16 Revizija je potekala od septembra 2018 do februarja 2019, zajemala pa je sektorje zdravstva, socialne zaščite, pravosodja in razvoja zasebnega sektorja (PACC: programme d’appui à la croissance verte et la compétitivité au Maroc).
The majority of the ENI expenditure in Morocco between 2014 and 2018 was in these sectors (see Annex II)9. 
S temi sektorji je bila povezana večina odhodkov evropskega instrumenta sosedstva v Maroku med letoma 2014 in 2018 (glej Prilogo II)9.
In addition to the BS programmes in these four sectors, we reviewed the 10 projects relating to the corresponding financing decisions (see Annex IV). 
Sodišče je poleg programov proračunske podpore v teh štirih sektorjih pregledalo deset projektov, povezanih z ustreznimi sklepi o financiranju (glej Prilogo IV).
We examined whether gender and human rights were addressed as cross-cutting issues in these BS programmes. 
Preučilo je, ali sta bili v teh programih proračunske podpore kot medsektorski vprašanji obravnavani vprašanji enakosti spolov in človekovih pravic.
Annex V summarises the objectives of the BS programmes audited and Annex VII provides an assessment by sector. 
V Prilogi V so povzeti cilji revidiranih programov proračunske podpore, Priloga VII pa vključuje ocene po posameznih sektorjih.
17 Our audit work consisted of a desk review, interviews with staff from the Commission Headquarters and the EEAS, and an on-the-spot visit. 
17 Revizijsko delo Sodišča je vključevalo dokumentacijski pregled, razgovore z zaposlenimi na sedežu Komisije in ESZD ter obisk na kraju samem.
The visit enabled us to collect further information and interview representatives of the national authorities and staff at the EU Delegation and representations of EU Member States in Morocco (Spanish and French representations). 
Med obiskom je Sodišče lahko zbralo dodatne informacije ter opravilo razgovore s predstavniki nacionalnih organov in zaposlenimi pri delegaciji EU in predstavništvih držav članic EU v Maroku (španskem in francoskem predstavništvu).
We also interviewed international organisations and other donors, such as the World Bank, the ADB, Unicef and the Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit. 
Opravilo je tudi razgovore z mednarodnimi organizacijami in drugimi donatorji, kot so Svetovna banka, Afriška 13 9 65 % dodeljenih odhodkov in 72 % plačil.
In addition, we visited beneficiaries including a detention centre for girls, a social protection centre and private companies that had received investment subsidies. 
Poleg tega je obiskalo upravičence, med drugim center za pridržanje za dekleta, center za socialno varstvo in zasebna podjetja, ki so prejela subvencije za naložbe.
18 As one of the EUŐs largest beneficiaries of external aid, Morocco is a strategic partner in key policy areas. 
18 Maroko je kot eden od največjih prejemnikov zunanje pomoči EU strateški partner na ključnih področjih.
The Commission can benefit from the conclusions and recommendations of this report by taking them into account for the next programming period (as from 2021). 
Komisija bo lahko imela koristi od zaključkov in priporočil iz tega poročila, če jih bo upoštevala pri načrtovanju naslednjega programskega obdobja (od leta 2021).
The relevance and potential impact of this report are therefore high. 15 
To poročilo je zato zelo pomembno in bi lahko imelo velik učinek. 14
Observations Focus and design of the support were sub-optimal Budget support spread too widely to maximise results 19 We looked at whether the Commission and the EEAS had consistently prioritised sectors for BS based on MoroccoŐs main needs. 
Opažanja Osredotočenost podpore in njena zasnova sta bili neoptimalni Proračunska podpora je bila preveč razdrobljena, da bi lahko zagotovila čim večje rezultate 19 Sodišče je preučilo, ali sta Komisija in ESZD prednostne sektorje za proračunsko podporo dosledno določali glede na glavne potrebe Maroka.
We checked whether an adequate needs assessment had been carried out. 
Preverilo je, ali je bila opravljena ustrezna ocena potreb.
We also considered whether the Commission had coordinated its approach appropriately with other donors active in Morocco. 
Obravnavalo je tudi, ali je Komisija svoj pristop ustrezno usklajevala z drugimi donatorji, dejavnimi v Maroku.
Budget support was based on an appropriate risk/needs assessment 20 The Commission considered BS to be the most appropriate instrument for supporting and sustaining the implementation of national and sectoral reforms. 
Proračunska podpora je temeljila na ustrezni oceni tveganja/potreb 20 Komisija je menila, da je proračunska podpora najustreznejši instrument za podpiranje in nadaljevanje izvajanja nacionalnih in sektorskih reform.
The Commission performs an annual risk analysis for the following categories: political governance, macroeconomic stability, development, public financial management and corruption/fraud. 
Komisija vsako leto opravi analizo tveganja za naslednje kategorije: politično upravljanje, makroekonomska stabilnost, razvoj, upravljanje javnih financ in korupcija/goljufije.
The eligibility criteria were clearly met at the design phase, and the fundamental values were not considered high risk. 
Očitno je, da so bila v fazi zasnove izpolnjena merila za upravičenost, poleg tega se tveganje v zvezi s temeljnimi vrednotami ni zdelo veliko.
MoroccoŐs risk level was assessed as moderate. 
Raven tveganja za Maroko je bila ocenjena kot zmerna.
21 According to the CommissionŐs risk analysis, however, one of the main residual risks concerned corruption. 
21 V skladu z analizo tveganja, ki jo je opravila Komisija, pa se je eno od glavnih preostalih tveganj nanašalo na korupcijo.
In the absence of an anti-corruption body, the Commission was not able to address corruption through this avenue. 
Zaradi neobstoja organa za preprečevanje korupcije Komisija korupcije ni mogla obravnavati po tej poti.
This meant that the Commission addressed corruption through some of its BS programmes. 
To pomeni, da jo je obravnavala v okviru nekaterih programov proračunske podpore.
For example, the digitalisation of procedures in the PACC programme is contributing to reducing corruption as well as measures and indicators in the health and social protection BS programmes. 
K zmanjšanju korupcije na primer prispeva digitalizacija postopkov v okviru programa PACC ter ukrepi in kazalniki v okviru programov proračunske podpore za zdravstvo in socialno zaščito.
In the justice programme, the organic law contains measures aimed at reducing corruption. 
V okviru programa za pravosodje sistemski zakon vsebuje ukrepe, namenjene zmanjšanju korupcije.
However, some of these, such as the code of ethics for judges, had not yet been adopted. 
Vendar nekateri od njih, na primer kodeks za sodnike, še niso bili sprejeti.