natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION The CIP programme is addressing potential deadweight issues in its design by requiring an intermediary to do more than it would do without the CIP guarantee, as the guarantee is conditional upon the intermediary exceeding the reference volume. 
ODgOVORI KOmISIjE V zasnovi programa PKI so morebitna vprašanja v zvezi z nepotrebno izgubo obravnavana z zahtevo, da posrednik naredi več, kot bi naredil brez garancije iz programa PKI, ker je garancija odvisna od tega, ali posrednik presega referenčni znesek.
The latter is defined as the estimated volume of finance that the intermediary would provide in the absence of the CIP guarantee. 
Ta znesek je opredeljen kot ocenjeni znesek financiranja, ki bi ga posrednik zagotovil, če ne bi bilo garancije iz programa PKI.
The Commission nonetheless agrees that appropriate measures to minimise deadweight should be envisaged in any successor programme. 
Komisija se kljub temu strinja, da je treba v vsakem programu, ki bo nasledil ta program, predvideti primerne ukrepe za čim večje zmanjšanje nepotrebne izgube.
Recommendation 5 The Commission accepts this recommendation, which will be taken into account for any successor programme to the SMEG. 
5 Komisija se strinja s tem priporočilom, ki se bo upoštevalo pri vsakem programu, ki bo nasledil garancijsko shemo za mSP.
The EIF does spread good practices especially in countries with developing financial markets and developing guarantee schemes. 
EIS razširja dobre prakse, zlasti v državah z razvijajočimi se finančnimi trgi in garancijskimi shemami.
All the relevant information is carefully evaluated and tailor-made solutions are proposed to fit the economic situation, taxation regime and business practices in the relevant market. 
Vse ustrezne informacije se natančno ocenijo in predlagajo se prilagojene rešitve, primerne za gospodarske razmere, davčno ureditev in poslovne prakse na upoštevnem trgu.
The Commission believes that there is a strong presumption in favour of EU added value being present, as observed by the MAP final evaluation. 
Komisija meni, da obstaja močna domneva o obstoju evropske dodane vrednosti, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v končni oceni programa mAP.
64 The 2004 external evaluation of the MAP concluded that: ‘Both instruments demonstrate clear European added value which is both quantitative: they have allowed financial intermediaries to take more risk through investing (ETF Start-up) and guaranteeing (SMEG) larger volumes; and qualitative: MAP support and EIF signature have given “legitimacy” to funds supported and to some extent to SME final beneficiaries (ETF Start-up), and helped microenterprises to become “bankable” (SMEG Micro-credit)’. 
64 V zunanji oceni programa mAP iz leta 2004 je bilo ugotovljeno, da: „oba instrumenta kažeta na jasno evropsko dodano vrednost, ki je kvantitativna: finančnim posrednikom omogočata prevzemanje večjega tveganja na podlagi naložb (sklad za zagon pri ETF) in jamčenja večjih zneskov (garancijska shema za mSP); ter tudi kvalitativna: s podporo iz programa mAP in podpisom EIS se je zagotovila ,legitimnost‘ podprtih skladov in delno končnih upravičencev mSP (sklad za zagon pri ETF) ter prispevalo k temu, da so mikropodjetja postala ,zanimiva za banke‘ (mikrokredit iz garancijske sheme za mSP)“.
It should be further noted that the same external evaluation concluded that: ‘[...] in countries where EIF has worked with powerful national financial intermedi-aries,[...] there have been strong complementarities leading to particularly high added value [...] and cross-fertilisation’; The outcome of this selection of cases could also be a reflection of the financial and economic crisis in 2008–10 (with the most severe recession since the Great Depression). 
Poleg tega je treba izpostaviti, da je bilo v isti zunanji oceni ugotovljeno, da: „[...] je bilo v državah, v katerih je EIS sodeloval z vplivnimi nacionalnimi finančnimi posredniki ,[...] doseženo veliko dopolnjevanje, kar je povzročilo zlasti visoko dodano vrednost [...] in medsebojno bogatenje“. Rezultat tega izbora primerov bi bil lahko posledica finančne in gospodarske krize v obdobju 2008–2010 (za katerega je značilna največja recesija po svetovni gospodarski krizi iz tridesetih let 20. stoletja).
Recommendation 6 The Commission accepts this recommendation, which is already being taken into account in the discussions and planning for the next generation of financial instruments in the post-2013 Multiannual Financial Framework, where ‘ensuring EU added value’ is one of the key principles that must be respected by all proposed instruments. 
6 Komisija se strinja s tem priporočilom, ki se je že upoštevalo pri razpravah in načrtovanju za naslednjo generacijo finančnih instrumentov v večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje po letu 2013, pri čemer je „zagotavljanje evropske dodane vrednosti“ eno od ključnih načel, ki jih je treba upoštevati v vseh predlaganih instrumentih.
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 4/2011 The audit of the SME guarantee facility Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2011 — 64 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-157-9 doi:10.2865/24926 
Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 revizija garancijske sheme za MsP Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2011 – 64 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-172-2 doi:10.2865/30278
Free publications: How to obtain EU publications • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • at the European Union's representations or delegations. 
kakO dO PUblIkacIj eVrOPske UnIje brezplačne publikacije: • na spletni strani EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • na predstavništvih ali delegacijah Evropske unije.
Priced subscriptions (e.g. annual series of the Official Journal of the European Union and reports of cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union): • via one of the sales agents of the Publications Office of the European Union (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm). 
Plačljive naročnine (na primer na Uradni­list­Evropske­unije ali zbirke odločb sodne prakse sodišča evropske unije): • pri prodajnih zastopnikih Urada za publikacije Evropske unije (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_sl.htm).
ONE OF THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE COMPETITIVENESS AND INNOVATION FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IS THE SME GUARANTEE FACILITY. 
EDEN OD FINANČNIh INSTRUmENTOV, KI SO BILI UVEDENI PRI PROgRAmU EVROPSKE UNIjE zA PODjETNIŠTVO IN INOVATIVNOST, jE gARANcIjSKA ShEmA zA mSP.
IN THIS REPORT, THE COURT EXAMINES THE FACILITY‘S DESIGN AND PLANNING, THE MANAGEMENT OF ITS OPERATIONS AND THE ACHIEVEMENT OF ITS OBJECTIVES IN ORDER TO ASSESS ITS EFFECTIVENESS. 
V TEm POROČILU SODIŠČE PREUČUjE zASNOVO IN NAČRTOVANjE ShEmE, UPRAVLjANjE NjENEgA DELOVANjA TER DOSEgANjE cILjEV, DA BI OcENILO NjENO USPEŠNOST.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-11-002-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE Qj-AB-11-002-SL-c
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS EN WERE ERDF CO-FINANCED TOURISM PROJECTS EFFECTIVE? 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE SL ALI SO BILI TURISTIČNI PROJEKTI, SOFINANCIRANI IZ ESRR, USPEŠNI?
Special Report No 6 2011 ISSN 1831-0834 
Posebno poročilo št.
Special Report No 6 2011 WERE ERDF CO-FINANCED TOURISM PROJECTS EFFECTIVE? (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 6 2011 ALI SO BILI TURISTIČNI PROJEKTI, SOFINANCIRANI IZ ESRR, USPEŠNI? (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Fax +352 4398-46410 E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Special Report No 6 2011 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011 ISBN 978-92-9237-179-1 doi:10.2865/32601 © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2011 ISBN 978-92-9237-194-4 doi:10.2865/38009 © Evropska unija, 2011 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
3 CONTENTS Paragraph GLOSSARY I–VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1–8 INTRODUCTION 1–3 TOURISM IN THE EU 4–8 STRUCTURAL MEASURES AND TOURISM 9–17 THE AUDIT 9–10 AUDIT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES 11–15 AUDIT METHODOLOGY 16–17 THE TYPES OF PROJECT IN THE AUDIT SAMPLE 18–58 OBSERVATIONS 18–46 DID PROJECTS DELIVER THEIR EXPECTED RESULTS? 
3 KAZALO Odstavek GLOSAR I–VI POVZETEK 1–8 UVOD 1–3 TURIZEM V EU 4–8 STRUKTURNI UKREPI IN TURIZEM 9–17 REVIZIJA 9–10 OBSEG IN SMOTRI REVIZIJE 11–15 REVIZIJSKA METODOLOGIJA 16–17 VRSTE PROJEKTOV V REVIZIJSKEM VZORCU 18–58 OPAŽANJA 18–46 ALI SO PROJEKTI PRINESLI PRIČAKOVANE REZULTATE?
48 MOST OF THE JOBS STILL EXISTED AT THE TIME OF THE AUDIT 49–53 ALMOST ALL PROJECTS CONTINUED TO OPERATE, BUT NOT NECESSARILY AT A PROFIT 54–58 DID GRANTS INFLUENCE THE EXISTENCE OR THE DESIGN OF PROJECTS? 
48 VEČINA DELOVNIH MEST JE V ČASU REVIZIJE ŠE OBSTAJALA 49–53 SKORAJ VSI PROJEKTI SO ŠE OBSTAJALI, VENDAR MORDA NISO PRINAŠALI DOBIČKA 54–58 ALI SO DONACIJE VPLIVALE NA OBSTOJ ALI NAČRTOVANJE PROJEKTOV?
ERDF: European Regional Development Fund. 
5 GLOSAR ESRR: Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj.
The ERDF is one of the Structural Funds. 
ESRR je eden od strukturnih skladov.
It is a financial instrument designed to promote economic and social cohesion between the regions of the EU. 
Je finančni instrument za spodbujanje ekonomske in socialne kohezije med regijami EU.
ERDF actions are mainly implemented through operational programmes encompassing a large number of projects. 
Ukrepi ESRR se večinoma izvajajo z operativnimi programi, v katere je vključenih veliko projektov.
Operational programme: Document approved by the Commission which takes the form of a coherent set of priorities comprising multiannual measures. 
Operativni program: dokument v obliki skladnega niza prednostnih nalog z večletnimi ukrepi, ki ga odobri Komisija.
The projects to be co-financed by the Structural Funds must fall within the scope of a measure. 
Projekti, ki se sofinancirajo iz strukturnih skladov, morajo spadati v okvir ukrepa.
Structural Funds: The European Union’s principal policy instruments in support of the Treaty objectives of economic and social cohesion. 
Strukturni skladi: glavni instrumenti politike Evropske unije, ki podpirajo cilja ekonomske in socialne kohezije iz Pogodbe.
6 I. Tourism is the third-largest economic sector worldwide and the largest service industry in the European Union (EU). 
6 I. Turizem je tretji največji gospodarski sektor na svetu in največji storitveni sektor v Evropski uniji (EU).
It is an increasingly important activity contributing to both economic growth and employment. 
Predstavlja čedalje pomembnejšo dejavnost, ki prispeva h gospodarski rasti in zaposlovanju.
For the 2000–06 programme period, 4 623 million euro were allocated under the European Regional Development Fund for physical investments in tourism. 
Za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 je bilo v okviru Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj dodeljenih 4 623 milijonov EUR za stvarne naložbe v turizem.
Projects are selected and managed by managing authorities in the Member States. 
Projekte izberejo in upravljajo organi upravljanja v državah članicah.
The present audit mainly measured performance results towards growth and employment, the overall aim of Structural Funds. 
Med to revizijo se je merila predvsem uspešnost pri rasti in zaposlovanju, kar je splošni cilj strukturnih skladov.
Information was directly collected from 206 project promoters randomly sampled in order to give a representative overview of the situation at the EU level. 
Informacije so se zbirale neposredno pri 206 pred-lagateljih projektov, ki so bili naključno izbrani za vzorec, da se zagotovi reprezentativni pregled stanja na ravni EU.
The Court examined whether tourism projects: (a) delivered the results expected of them; (b) have produced sustainable results; (c) were undertaken as a result of EU support. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali: (a) so turistični projekti dali pričakovane rezultate, (b) so bili rezultati turističnih projektov trajni, (c) so bili turistični projekti izvedeni kot rezultat podpore EU.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V. The Court found that: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) most projects had several results, either by creating or maintaining jobs (58 %) or by creating tourism capacity (73 %) or activity (74 %). 
POVZETEK V. Sodišče je ugotovilo, da: (a) je imela večina projektov po več rezultatov: ustvarjena ali ohranjena delovna mesta (58 %), nove turistične zmogljivosti (73 %) ali nove dejavnosti (74 %).
44 % of projects had results in all three categories; projects for which objectives were set achieved them on average at 75 % for jobs creation or maintenance and 93 % for tourism capacity. 
44 % projektov je dalo rezultate v vseh treh kategorijah; (b) so bili pri projektih, za katere so bili določeni cilji, ti cilji v povprečju 75-odstotno doseženi pri ustvarjanju in ohranjanju delovnih mest ter 93-odstotno pri izgradnji turističnih zmogljivosti.
When no such objectives were set, certain projects still achieved some results; the situation in respect of targets, indicators and monitoring varied in the regions visited; at the time of the audit, 98 % of completed projects were still operational and 94 % of the jobs created or maintained by projects still existed; public financial support enabled 74 % of the projects to be undertaken, another 20 % of projects were modified because of the grant and it had no influence in 6 % of projects. 
Kadar takšni cilji niso bili določeni, so nekateri projekti kljub temu prinesli nekaj rezultatov; (c) se je stanje glede na cilje, kazalnike in spremljanje razlikovalo po obiskanih regijah; (d) se je v času revizije 98 % projektov še nadaljevalo, 94 % delovnih mest, ki so bila s projekti ustvarjena ali ohranjena, pa je še vedno obstajalo; (e) je javnofinančna podpora omogočila izvedbo 74 % projektov, 20 % projektov je bilo zaradi donacije spremenjenih, na 6 % projektov pa ta ni vplivala.
The lower the rate of assistance, the less its impact on the project; while 92 % of the promoters perceived the ERDF grant as recognition of the quality of their project, 42 % of them considered that the ERDF subsidy considerably increased their administrative burden. 
Nižja ko je raven pomoči, manjši je njen učinek na projekt; (f ) je 92 % predlagateljev projektov donacijo ESRR razumelo kot priznanje kakovosti njihovega projekta, vendar jih je 42 % menilo, da je donacija ESRR precej povečala njihovo upravno obremenitev.
The lower the rate of assistance, the more the ERDF grant is perceived as being burdensome. Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 
Nižja ko je raven pomoči, bolj se donacija ESRR občuti kot obremenjujoča. Posebno poročilo št. 6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni?
The Court recommends that: (a) managing authorities should ensure that projects are set up with suitable objectives, targets and indicators and the Commission should encourage this practice; (b) managing authorities should pay more attention to whether the grants are actually necessary for the realisation of proposed projects and what impact projects will have in terms of increasing employment and economic growth and the Commission should encourage this practice; (c) the Commission should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of aid in this sector and consider whether support could be better targeted. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj: (a) organi upravljanja zagotovijo, da se projekti načrtujejo s primernimi smotri, cilji in kazalniki, Komisija pa naj to spodbuja; (b) organi upravljanja namenijo več pozornosti temu, ali so donacije resnično potrebne za izvedbo predlaganih projektov in kakšen učinek bodo imeli projekti na povečanje zaposlovanja in gospodarske rasti, Komisija pa naj to spodbuja; (c) Komisija oceni stroškovno učinkovitost pomoči v tem sektorju in razmisli, ali bi bilo podporo mogoče bolje usmerjati.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Photo 1 — Historic building converted into a four-star hotel (Spain) 7 © European Union Source: European Court of Auditors, January 2010. 
POVZETEK Fotografija 1 – Zgodovinska stavba, preure-jena v hotel s štirimi zvezdicami (Španija) © Evropska unija Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče, januar 2010.
Special Report No 6/2011 – Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective? 8 INTRODUCTION TOURISM IN THE EU 1. 
6/2011 – Ali so bili turistični projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR, uspešni? 8 UVOD TURIZEM V EU 1.
Tourism has been defined as ‘the activities of persons travelling to and staying in places outside their usual environment for not more than one consecutive year for leisure, business and other purposes’1. 
Turizem je bil opredeljen kot „dejavnosti oseb, ki potujejo v kraje zunaj njihovega običajnega okolja in tam tudi ostanejo manj kakor eno leto brez prekinitve z namenom preživljanja prostega časa, sprostitve, poslov ali zaradi drugih razlogov“1.
It has become an important part of the life of European citizens, more of whom are travelling, both for leisure and business purposes. 
Postal je pomemben del življenja evropskih državljanov, ki vedno več potujejo v prostem času in poslovno.
It serves to strengthen the feeling of European citizenship through more contacts and exchanges between citizens of differing languages, cultures and traditions2. 
Krepi občutek evropskega državljanstva, saj se z njim povečuje število stikov in izmenjav med govorci različnih jezikov ter pripadniki različnih kultur in izročil2.
It is one of the areas where the European Union (EU) has competence to carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement Member State actions3. 
Je eno od področij, na katerih je Evropska unija (EU) pristojna za izvajanje ukrepov za podporo, usklajevanje ali dopolnjevanje ukrepov držav članic3.
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) emphasises the importance of the tourism sector, in which the Union’s aim is to encourage favourable conditions for development of undetakings and to promote cooperation between Member States, particularly by the exchange of good practice4. 
V Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je poudarjen pomen turističnega sektorja, v katerem želi Unija spodbujati ugodne razmere za razvoj podjetij na tem področju in sodelovanje med državami članicami, zlasti z izmenjavo dobre prakse4.
Tourism is the third largest sector worldwide in terms of economic activity and the largest service industry in the EU5. 
Turizem je med gospodarskimi dejavnostmi tretji največji sektor na svetu in največji storitveni sektor v EU5.
The industry generates more than 5 % of EU gross domestic product (GDP), with approximately 1,8 million enterprises employing an estimated 5,2 % of the total labour force (9,7 million jobs). 
Ustvari več kot 5 % bruto domačega proizvoda (BDP) EU s približno 1,8 milijona podjetij, v katerih je po ocenah zaposlenih 5,2 % skupne delovne sile (9,7 milijona delovnih mest).
When related sectors are taken into account, the estimated contribution of tourism rises to 10 % of GDP and 12 % of the labour force6. 
Ob upoštevanju povezanih sektorjev se po ocenah delež turizma v bruto domačem proizvodu poveča na 10 %, v delovni sili pa na 12 %6.
1 Commission Decision 1999/35/EC of 9 December 1998 on the procedures for implementing Council Directive 95/57/EC on the collection of statistical information in the field of tourism (OJ L 9, 15.1.1999, p. 
1 Odločba Komisije 1999/35/EC z dne 9. decembra 1998 o postopkih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta ES 95/57 o zbiranju statističnih podatkov na področju turizma (UL L 9, 15.1.1999, str.
2 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: ‘Europe, the world’s No 1 tourist destination — a new political framework for tourism in Europe’, COM(2010) 352 final of 30 June 2010. 
2 Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij: „Evropa, prva svetovna turistična destinacija – nov okvir evropske turistične politike“, COM(2010) 352 konč. z dne 30. junija 2010.
3 Articles 6(d) and 195 of the TFEU (OJ C 83, 30.3.2010, p. 
3 Člen 6(d) in člen 195 PDEU (UL C 83, 30.3.2010, str.
1 and p. 
1 in str.
4 Article 195 of the TFEU. 
4 Člen 195 PDEU.
5 ‘Sustainable tourism as a factor of cohesion among European regions’, Committee of the Regions, March 2006 (p. 
5 „Trajnostni turizem kot dejavnik kohezije med evropskimi regijami“, Odbor regij, marec 2006 (str.
6 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: ‘Europe, the world’s No 1 tourist destination — a new political framework for tourism in Europe’, COM(2010) 352 final of 30 June 2010. 
6 Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij:„Evropa, prva svetovna turistična destinacija – nov okvir evropske turistične politike“, COM(2010) 352 konč. z dne 30. junija 2010.
STRUCTURAL MEASURES AND TOURISM 4. 
STRUKTURNI UKREPI IN TURIZEM 4.
More specifically, they should contribute to a balanced and sustainable development of economic activities and of employment and human resources7. 
Natančneje, prispevali naj bi k uravnoteženemu in trajnostnemu razvoju gospodarskih dejavnosti ter zaposlovanja in kadrovskih virov7.
In the 2000–06 period, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) provided support to productive investments to create and safeguard jobs and for the development of tourism and cultural investment, with the proviso that the jobs created were to be sustainable8. 
Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) je v obdobju 2000–2006 zagotovil podporo za naložbe v proizvajalna sredstva, ki omogočajo ustvarjanje in ohranjanje delovnih mest, ter za razvoj turističnih in kulturnih naložb s pridržkom, da morajo biti ustvarjena delovna mesta trajna8.
Projects are co-financed by the EU through multiannual operational programmes. 
EU sofinancira projekte v okviru večletnih operativnih programov.
These programmes define priorities, each comprising a number of measures, some of which include support for tourism. 
Ti programi opredeljujejo prednostne naloge, ki so sestavljene iz več ukrepov, od katerih nekateri vključujejo podporo za turizem.
The programmes are drawn up by the Member States following a consultation process between the Commission and national, regional and local public authorities, and the economic and social partners in the Member States. 
Programe pripravijo države članice po procesu posvetovanja med Komisijo in nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi javnimi organi ter gospodarskimi in socialnimi partnerji v državah članicah.
The Commission appraises and approves the programmes. 
Komisija programe oceni in odobri.
Individual projects are proposed by project promoters. 
Posamezne projekte predlagajo predlagatelji projektov.
National, regional or local authorities designated by Member States organise selection procedures and approve the projects. 
Na-cionalni, regionalni ali lokalni organi, ki jih določijo države članice, organizirajo izbirne postopke in odobrijo projekte.
The promoters should provide the competent managing authorities with monitoring information on project progress and the achievement of objectives. 
Predlagatelji projektov bi morali pristojnim organom upravljanja zagotoviti informacije o spremljanju napredka in doseganju ciljev pri projektih.
7 Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 
1260/1999 z dne 21. junija 1999 o splošnih določbah o Strukturnih skladih, uvodna izjava (5) (UL L 161, 26.6.1999, str.
8 Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1783/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 1999 on the European Regional Development Fund, (OJ L 213, 13.8.1999, p. 
1783/1999 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 1999 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj (UL L 213, 13.8.1999, str.