natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission underlines that the audit intensity for POSEI measures has been stepped up in the last 2 years where all the relevant Member States and measures (materiality) have been audited. 
Poudarja, da se je intenzivnost revizije za ukrepe POSEI v zadnjih dveh letih povečala, ko so bile revidirane vse zadevne države članice in ukrepi (pomembnost).
Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (5) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (5) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
The common indicators (as defined in Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No180/2014) had to be gathered since the presentation of the 2013 annual reports to be presented in 2014. 
Po predložitvi letnih poročil za leto 2013 je bilo treba zbrati enotne kazalnike (kot so opredeljeni v Prilogi VIII k Uredbi (EU) št. 180/2014), ki bodo predstavljeni leta 2014.
If some indicators were missing in these 2013 reports (70 % of indicators), all the indicators are given in the 2014 reports (received in 2015), although some improvements should still be brought in the following reports. 
Četudi so v teh poročilih za leto 2013 nekateri kazalniki manjkali (70 % kazalnikov), so v poročilih za leto 2014 (prejetih leta 2015) navedeni vsi kazalniki, kljub temu da bi bilo treba v naslednjih poročilih uvesti nekaj izboljšav.
The Commission analyses these data on an annual basis and if necessary requests further information from Member States to improve some of their data. 
Komisija te podatke vsako leto analizira in od držav članic po potrebi zahteva dodatne informacije, da izboljša nekatere njihove podatke.
Within 2 years, the presentation of the common indicators by the Member States has improved considerably and is now done in a comprehensive way. 
Države članice so v dveh letih bistveno izboljšale predstavitev enotnih kazalnikov, ki sedaj poteka na celovit način.
Cohesion: social fund spending on older workers Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (1) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Kohezija: poraba socialnega sklada za starejše delavce Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (1) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
Investment priorities in the 2014-2020 ESF regulation define, where relevant, the concerned target groups. 
Kjer je primerno, prednostne naložbe v uredbi o ESS za obdobje 2014–2020 opredeljujejo zadevne ciljne skupine.
A relevant investment priority refers to ‘active and healthy ageing’. 
Pomembna prednostna naložba se nanaša na „dejavno in zdravo staranje“.
When managing authorities select this investment priority, to define the specific objective, following for example a country specific recommendation, they must define targets for outputs and results at this level. 
Da lahko organi upravljanja, kadar izberejo to prednostno naložbo, opredelijo posebni cilj, na primer v skladu s priporočilom za posamezno državo, morajo opredeliti cilje za učinke in rezultate na tej ravni.
Furthermore, the annual reporting (Annual Implementation Report) will include common indicators, which are related among others to age group and labour market status (i.e. ESF common longer-term indicator: ‘participants above 54 years of age in employment, including self-employment, 6 months after leaving’ [the operation]). 
Poleg tega bodo v letno poročanje (letno poročilo o izvajanju) vključeni skupni kazalniki, ki so med drugim povezani s starostno skupino in statusom na trgu dela (tj. skupni dolgoročni kazalnik ESS: „udeleženci, starejši od 54 let, vključno s samozaposlenimi, ki imajo zaposlitev šest mesecev po zaključku sodelovanja“ [pri operaciji]).
The Commission considers that it will have sufficient information to measure the effectiveness of the actions on older workers, the same as for young unemployed. 
Komisija meni, da bo imela dovolj informacij za merjenje uspešnosti ukrepov za starejše delavce, tako kot za mlade brezposelne.
The principle of shared management — pursuant to which Member States implement the OPs — does not allow for a proper monitoring of result targets at project level. 
Načelo deljenega upravljanja, v skladu s katerim države članice izvajajo operativne programe, ne omogoča ustreznega spremljanja ciljnih vrednosti na ravni projekta.
However, the common provisions regulation (CPR) — Regulation 1303/2013) allowing the use of simplified costs options (SCOs) — will help managing authorities and beneficiaries to focus on results at project level. 
1303/2013), ki omogoča uporabo možnosti poenostavljenih stroškov, organom upravljanja in upravičencem omogočila, da se osredotočijo na rezultate na ravni projekta.
Since 2011, the Commission has organised awareness-raising and capacity-building events with Member States on conducting counterfactual impact evaluations. 
Komisija je od leta 2011 z državami članicami organizirala več dogodkov o izvajanju hipotetičnih ocen učinka, ki so bili namenjeni ozaveščanju in krepitvi zmogljivosti.
In order to provide methodological support to Member States, a Centre for Research on Impact Evaluation was set up in 2013 at the Joint Research Centre in Ispra. 
Da bi se državam članicam zagotovila metodološka podpora, je bilo leta 2013 v skupnem raziskovalnem središču v Ispri vzpostavljeno središče za raziskovanje ocen učinka.
Reply of the Commission 50 There have been recurrent discussions on this topic with the managing authorities in the framework of the ESF Evaluation Partnership. 
Odgovori Komisije 50 O tej temi se je v okviru partnerskih srečanj za ocenjevanje ESS večkrat razpravljalo z organi upravljanja.
The Commission funded eight pilot counterfactual impact evaluations on ESF interventions in Spain, Italy (two projects), Estonia, Portugal (two projects), Lithuania and Slovakia. 
Komisija je financirala osem pilotnih hipotetičnih ocen učinka ukrepov ESS v Španiji, Italiji (dva projekta), Estoniji, na Portugalskem (dva projekta), v Litvi in na Slovaškem.
The results have been disseminated in various fora and at a Conference in Brussels. 
Rezultati so bili objavljeni na različnih forumih in na konferenci v Bruslju.
Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (2) The Commission considers this recommendation to be fully implemented. 
Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (2) Komisija meni, da je to priporočilo izvedeno v celoti.
Data on all indicators — common and programme-specific alike — are submitted as a structured data set to the Commission by electronic means as part of the Annual Implementation Reports (AIR), the Youth Employment Initiative report for 2015 and the final report. 
Podatki o vseh kazalnikih – skupnih in za posamezni program – se Komisiji pošljejo po elektronski poti kot strukturiran niz podatkov v okviru letnih poročil o izvajanju, poročilu o pobudi za zaposlovanje mladih za leto 2015 in končnem poročilu.
These data will allow the Commission to monitor annually the progress towards target values by target group and achievement ratio can be calculated at the level of investment priorities (costs/output/results). 
Ti podatki bodo Komisiji omogočili, da vsako leto spremlja napredek pri doseganju ciljnih vrednosti po posameznih ciljnih skupinah, na ravni prednostnih naložb pa bo mogoče izračunati stopnjo uresničevanja (stroški/učinek/rezultati).
The employment effect will be measured through the related common longer term result indicators. 
Učinek zaposlovanja se bo meril s povezanimi enotnimi dolgoročnejšimi kazalniki rezultatov.
The measurement of net employment effects can be measured by counterfactual impact evaluations. 
Merjenje neto učinkov na zaposlovanje se lahko meri s hipotetičnimi ocenami učinka.
Managing authorities have to carry out impact evaluation, albeit not necessarily counterfactual evaluations. 
Organi upravljanja morajo izvesti oceno učinka, čeprav ne nujno hipotetičnih ocen.
The Commission has however been promoting the use of counterfactual impact evaluations through organising awareness-raising and capacity-building events and setting up the Centre for Research on Impact Evaluation. 
Komisija sicer spodbuja uporabo hipotetičnih ocen učinka z organiziranjem dogodkov za ozaveščanje in krepitev zmogljivosti ter vzpostavitvijo središča za raziskovanje ocen učinka.
A series of training sessions and regional workshops have been carried out in the Member States. 
V državah članicah je bilo izvedenih več usposabljanj in regionalnih delavnic.
External actions: contributions channelled through UN organisations Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (3) Reply to the second indent: The Commission considers that the implementation of such information system on benchmarks in conflict affected countries is not feasible. 
Zunanji ukrepi: prispevki, usmerjeni prek organizacij ZN Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (3) Odgovor na drugo alineo: Komisija meni, da izvajanje takšnega informacijskega sistema o merilih uspešnosti v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih, ni mogoče.
The reasons are to be seen both at the level of the difficulty to ensure the consistency of data (which needs to be complete, reliable and constantly updated) and as its relatively high cost and negative cost-effectiveness relation. 
Težko je namreč zagotoviti doslednost podatkov (ki morajo biti popolni in zanesljivi ter jih je treba redno posodabljati), stroški bi bili razmeroma visoki, stroškovna učinkovitost pa negativna.
Therefore, the Commission believes that this second point of the recommendation is implemented. 
Komisija zato meni, da je ta druga točka priporočila izvedena.
Annex VI Annex VIII External actions: CRIS Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (1) The intended role of CRIS as an information system, notably with regard to the Commission’s ABAC accounting system, has been clarified in the context of the new strategy for the Commission’s information systems. 
Priloga VI Priloga VIII Zunanji ukrepi: CRIS Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (1) Načrtovana vloga CRIS kot informacijskega sistema, zlasti v zvezi z računovodskim sistemom Komisije ABAC, je bila pojasnjena v okviru nove strategije za informacijske sisteme Komisije.
On 12/06/2014, a new strategy stating the following was endorsed by the Commission: — CRIS financial functionalities are to be replaced by ABAC to the possible extent following the Commission’s rationalisation strategy. 
Komisija je 12. junija 2014 potrdila novo strategijo, pri čemer je navedla naslednje: — finančne funkcije sistema CRIS bo, kolikor je mogoče, v skladu s strategijo racionalizacije Komisije zamenjal sistem ABAC.
Evolutive maintenance activities should be frozen for modules to be transferred to ABAC, except evolutive maintenance contributing to improving data quality, reporting, implementing simplification-related actions and reducing maintenance costs. 
Dejavnosti razvojnega vzdrževanja, razen razvojnega vzdrževanja, ki prispeva k izboljšanju kakovosti podatkov, poročanju, izvajanju ukrepov za poenostavitev in zmanjšanju stroškov vzdrževanja, bi bilo treba prekiniti, da se lahko moduli prenesejo v sistem ABAC,
Reply of the Commission 51 — CRIS functionalities that cannot be managed in ABAC will be included in a future operational system, based on a modern technology answering operational needs, including transparency-related requirements (called OPSYS). 
Odgovori Komisije 51 — funkcije CRIS, ki jih v sistemu ABAC ni mogoče izvajati, bodo vključene v prihodnji operacijski sistem, ki bo temeljil na sodobni tehnologiji in bo izpolnjeval operativne potrebe, vključno z zahtevami v zvezi s preglednostjo (imenovan OPSYS).
This strategy is implemented according to the following roadmap: — The management of guarantees is exclusively performed in ABAC since 01/01/2014. — Financial Forecasting: a new tool (BPC) has been implemented since December 2014 and replaces the former CRIS forecasting module. — The financial modules of CRIS (Invoices, Payments, Recovery Orders, Forecast of Revenues) will be phased out in April 2016. 
Ta strategija se izvaja v skladu z naslednjim načrtom: — upravljanje jamstev poteka od 1. januarja 2014 izključno v sistemu ABAC, — finančno napovedovanje: z decembrom 2014 je bilo uvedeno novo orodje (BPC), ki je zamenjalo prejšnji modul sistema CRIS za napovedovanje, — finančni moduli sistema CRIS (računi, plačila, nalogi za izterjavo, napoved prihodkov) se bodo postopno nehali uporabljati aprila 2016.
The financial modules of ABAC will be used as from that date. 
Od navedenega datuma se bodo uporabljali finančni moduli sistema ABAC.
For the operational modules Contracts and Decisions, a gap analysis is currently ongoing with the aim of its integration into cooperate systems (SYGMA, e-procurement). 
Za operativna modula pogodbe in sklepi se trenutno izvaja analiza vrzeli, da bi se lahko vključila v skupne sisteme (SYGMA, e-javno naročanje).
Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (2) CRIS data codes rationalisation is an ongoing activity. 
Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (2) Racionalizacija šifrantov podatkov za CRIS se izvaja.
The Commission is currently reviewing the management of regional geographical data. 
Komisija trenutno pregleduje upravljanje regionalnih geografskih podatkov.
A three-step process is currently under review to only allow the encoding of geographical zones at the level of a country (not at the level of the regions anymore), to automatically deduct the DAC recipient zone from the beneficiary zone and to ensure consistency in the encoding of the action location data. 
Trenutno se preverja postopek v treh korakih, da bo mogoče šifrirati le geografske cone na ravni države (ne več na ravni regij), da se bo cona prejemnika pomoči Odbora za razvojno pomoč samodejno odbila od cone upravičenca in da se bo zagotovila doslednost pri šifriranju podatkov o lokaciji ukrepa.
The Commission is also reviewing the list of domains and will link this reduced list to budget lines currently used by different Commission services in CRIS. 
Komisija preverja tudi seznam domen, ta skrajšani seznam pa bo povezala s proračunskimi postavkami, ki jih trenutno uporabljajo različne službe Komisije v sistemu CRIS.
Moreover, the rationalisation of CRIS in April 2016 leads to a de facto rationalisation of codes (using ABAC codes). 
Poleg tega se bodo z racionalizacijo sistema CRIS aprila 2016 dejansko racionalizirale tudi šifre (z uporabo šifer sistema ABAC).
Replies of the Commission to the Court’s recommendations (4) The Commission considers the implementation status to have moved towards ‘fully implemented’. 
Odgovori Komisije na priporočila Sodišča (4) Komisija meni, da se je stanje izvedbe spremenilo v „v celoti izvedeno“.
The Commission has signed a specific contract (reference No 84) on 21 October 2014. 
Komisija je 21. oktobra 2014 podpisala posebno pogodbo (ref. št. 84).
A special report focused on the security of personal and financial data has been delivered on 18 December 2014. 
Posebno poročilo, ki je bilo usmerjeno na varnost osebnih in finančnih podatkov, je bilo predloženo 18. decembra 2014.
The full security assessment report has been delivered on 30 September 2015. 
Celovito poročilo o oceni varnosti je bilo predloženo 30. septembra 2015.
Following up the Court’s special reports is a necessary element in the cycle of accountability and helps to encourage the effective implementation of recommendations by the Commission and the Member States. 
Spremljanje popravljalnih učinkov posebnih poročil Evropskega računskega sodišča je nujen element v verigi odgovornosti, ki Komisijo in države članice spodbuja k uspešnemu izvajanju priporočil.
The current report presents the results of the Court’s fourth review of the Commission’s follow-up of a sample of 44 recommendations from eight special reports over the period 2009-2012. 
V tem poročilu so predstavljeni rezultati četrtega pregleda, ki ga je Sodišče opravilo v zvezi z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem Komisije na podlagi vzorca 44 priporočil iz osmih posebnih poročil, objavljenih v obdobju 2009–2012.
Our review showed that the Commission implemented 89 % of our recommendations in full or in most respects, 8 % in some respects, while 3 % were not implemented. 
Pregled je pokazal, da je Komisija 89 % priporočil Sodišča izvedla v celoti ali večinoma, 8 % deloma, 3 % pa ni izvedla.
We also recommend that the Commission should carry out some improvements to its follow-up practices. 
Sodišče tudi priporoča, naj Komisija uvede nekaj izboljšav svojih praks za nadaljnje ukrepanje.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 07 The European External Action Service’s management of its buildings around the world EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
št. 07 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Upravljanje stavb Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje po svetu EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel.: +352 4398-1 Vprašanja: eca.europa.eu/sl/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Internet: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA Veliko dodatnih informacij o Evropski uniji je na voljo na internetu (http://europa.eu).
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-4538-0 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-4516-8 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-4513-7 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/74500 doi:10.2865/221104 doi:10.2865/30017 QJ-AB-16-007-EN-C QJ-AB-16-007-EN-N QJ-AB-16-007-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-4514-4 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-4553-3 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-4543-4 ISSN 1831-094X ISSN 1977-5784 ISSN 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/483283 doi:10.2865/332509 doi:10.2865/86369 QJ-AB-16-007-SL-C QJ-AB-16-007-SL-N QJ-AB-16-007-SL-E © Evropska unija, 2016 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira. št.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 07 The European External Action Service’s management of its buildings around the world (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
07 Posebno poročilo SL 2016 Upravljanje stavb Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje po svetu (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
The audit was led by ECA Member Pietro Russo, supported by the Attaché of his private office, François Gautier; Mark Crisp, Director; Paul Stafford, Principal Manager; Mark Marshall, Head of Task; and Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand, auditor. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Pietro Russo, pri njej pa so sodelovali ataše njegovega kabineta François Gautier, direktor Mark Crisp, vodilni upravni uslužbenec Paul Stafford, vodja naloge Mark Marshall in revizorka Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand.
From left to right: M. Marshall, P. Russo, F. Gautier, P. Pucheux-Lallemand, P. Stafford. 
Od leve proti desni: M. Marshall, P. Russo, F. Gautier, P. Pucheux-Lallemand, P. Stafford.
Contents 04 48-66 Section III — Information on the suitability of buildings is not reliable and is not used for planning, which is too short term and particularly weak for owned properties 49-59 Central monitoring systems do not provide reliable basic information on the suitability of all delegation buildings 60-62 Planning makes insufficient use of available information and is short term 63-66 Planning systems for owned properties are particularly weak 67-72 Conclusions and recommendations Annex I — Annex II — Annex III — Co-location with EU Member States in EU delegations Details of review of 30 building files Reasons why delegation buildings do not provide best value for money Reply of the EEAS 
Kazalo 04 48–66 49–59 60–62 63–66 67–72 Oddelek III – Informacije o ustreznosti stavb niso zanesljive in se ne uporabljajo za načrtovanje, ki je preveč kratkoročno in še posebej ohlapno pri lastniških nepremičninah Centralni sistemi za spremljanje ne zagotavljajo zanesljivih osnovnih informacij o ustreznosti vseh stavb delegacij Razpoložljive informacije se pri načrtovanju ne uporabljajo dovolj,načrtovanje pa je kratkoročno Sistemi za načrtovanje lastniških nepremičnin so še posebej šibki Zaključki in priporočila Priloga I – Priloga II – Priloga III – Kolokacija z državami članicami EU v delegacijah EU Podrobnosti pregleda 30 primerov dokumentacije o stavbah Razlogi za stroškovno neučinkovitost stavb delegacij Odgovor ESZD
Delegation: Around 140 EU delegations operate worldwide to promote EU interests and values and to deliver trade and development cooperation. 
Glosar 05 Delegacija: Po vsem svetu deluje približno 140 delegacij EU, ki uveljavljajo interese in vrednote EU ter trgovinsko in razvojno sodelovanje.
Most delegations are responsible for EU relations with one country. 
Večina delegacij je odgovorna za odnose EU z eno državo.
Others are dedicated to maintaining relations with multilateral or international organisations such as the African Union or the United Nations. 
Druge so namenjene vzdrževanju odnosov z večstranskimi ali mednarodnimi organizacijami, kot sta Afriška unija ali Združeni narodi.
One third of delegation staff work for the EEAS; the others work for the European Commission, in directorates-general such as DG International Cooperation and Development, DG Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations and DG Trade. 
Tretjina zaposlenih v delegacijah dela za ESZD, drugi pa za Evropsko komisijo v generalnih direktoratih, kot so GD za mednarodno sodelovanje in razvoj, GD za sosedstvo in širitvena pogajanja in GD za trgovino.
European External Action Service (EEAS): The European External Action Service is the European Union’s diplomatic service. 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD): Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) je diplomatska služba Evropske unije.
Its role is to coordinate the EU’s foreign and security policy. 
Njena vloga je usklajevati zunanjo in varnostno politiko EU.
The head of the EEAS is the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, who is also Vice-President of the European Commission. 
Vodja ESZD je visoki predstavnik za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, ki je tudi podpredsednik Evropske komisije.
Formally launched on 1 January 2011, the EEAS was created by the Treaty of Lisbon. 
ESZD, ki je uradno začela delovati 1. januarja 2011, je bila ustanovljena z Lizbonsko pogodbo.
It brings together staff from relevant departments of the General Secretariat of the Council and of the European Commission as well as diplomatic staff from the EU Member States. 
Združuje osebje iz ustreznih oddelkov Generalnega sekretariata Sveta in Evropske komisije ter diplomatsko osebje iz držav članic EU.
The EEAS has its headquarters in Brussels and is responsible for running around 140 EU delegations worldwide. 
ESZD ima sedež v Bruslju in je odgovorna za vodenje približno 140 delegacij EU po vsem svetu.
Head of administration: The head of administration assists the head of delegation in the day-to-day running of the delegation. 
Vodja administracije: Vodja administracije pomaga vodji delegacije pri vsakodnevnem vodenju delegacije.
He/she coordinates the work of the administration section and is responsible for human resources and safety management, financial management and implementation of the delegation’s budget, and management of logistics, purchasing and premises. 
Usklajuje delo odseka za administracijo in je odgovoren za upravljanje človeških virov in varnosti, finančno upravljanje in izvrševanje proračuna delegacije, ter za upravljanje logistike, nabave in prostorov.
Head of delegation: The heads of delegation assist the High Representative and the Commission in fulfilling their mandates in the field of external relations. 
Vodja delegacije: Vodje delegacij pomagajo visokemu predstavniku in Komisiji pri opravljanju njunih nalog na področju zunanjih odnosov.
The head of delegation is responsible for the management of all the delegation staff and financial resources. 
Vodja delegacije je odgovoren za upravljanje vsega osebja in finančnih virov delegacije.