natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1 dG agriculture and rural development, Agriculture in the EU — Statistical and Economic information 2011, March 2012. GRApH 1 FOREST And OTHER wOOdEd LAnd VS AGRICULTURAL LAnd In THE EU-27 60 000 50 000 40 000 30 000 20 000 10 000 0 Utilised agricultural area (1 000 ha) Forest and other wooded land (1 000 ha) Source: Eurostat. 
1 GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, Kmetijstvo v Evropski uniji – Statistične in gospodarske informacije za leto 2011, marec 2012. dIaGram 1 GozdovI In drUGa Gozdna zemljIšča v PrImerjavI s kmetIjskImI zemljIščI v eU-27 60 000 50 000 40 000 30 000 20 000 10 000 0 kmetijska zemljišča v uporabi (v 1 000 ha) gozdovi in druga gozdna zemljišča (v 1 000 ha) Vir: Eurostat.
Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development Sweden Spain Finland France Germany Italy Poland Romania Greece Austria Bulgaria Portugal Latvia United Kingdom Czech Republic Estonia Lithuania Hungary Slovakia Slovenia Ireland Belgium Denmark Cyprus Netherlands Luxembourg Malta 
Posebno poročilo št. 8/2013 – Podpora Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja za povečanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov Švedska Španija Finska Francija Nemčija Italija Poljska Romunija Grčija Avstrija Bolgarija Portugalska Latvija Združeno kraljestvo Češka Estonija Litva Madžarska Slovaška Slovenija Irska Belgija Danska Ciper Nizozemska Luksemburg Malta
2. in 2009, the Eu accounted for about 12 % of the world’s wood produc-tion2 with 392,9 million m3 of wood removed from its forest and wooded areas. forestry, logging and related service activities cover the production of timber, as well as the extraction and gathering of wild growing forest products. in addition to industrial roundwood3, forestry produces wood for fuel. in certain regions non-wood goods4 can also be an important source of local income. 
2. V letu 2009 je bil delež EU v svetovni proizvodnji lesa približno 12 % lesa s spravilom2 392,9 milijona m3 lesa iz svojih gozdov in gozdnih površin.
FOREST OwnERSHIp 3. With some 16 million private forest owners, this category represents around 60 % of Eu forestry ownership. private forest holdings have an average size of 13 hectares, but the majority of privately owned forests are smaller than five hectares5. it is estimated that individuals and families own around 80 % of forest areas in private ownership and the rest is owned by private institutions and companies6. the area of privately owned forest has increased in recent years, and is still increasing, due principally to afforestation of agricultural land and, in eastern Europe, to privatisation of formerly nationalised forest land7. 
V EU je približno 16 milijonov lastnikov zasebnih gozdov, zato ta kategorija predstavlja okoli 60 % lastništva gozdov v EU. Povprečna velikost zasebnih gozdnih posesti je 13 hektarjev, vendar je večina gozdov v zasebni lasti manjših od pet hektarjev.5 Po ocenah imajo posamezniki in družine v lasti okoli 80 % gozdnih površin v zasebni lasti, preostalo pa je v lasti zasebnih ustanov in podjetij.6 Površina gozdov v zasebni lasti se je v zadnjih letih povečala in še narašča, v glavnem zaradi pogozdovanja kmetijskih zemljišč, v Vzhodni Evropi pa tudi zaradi privatizacije nekoč nacionaliziranih gozdnih zemljišč.7 4.
2 removals is a common measure of the magnitude of the extraction of wood from forests. 
2 Spravilo je skupni izraz za obseg pridobivanja lesa iz gozdov.
3 ‘industrial roundwood’ is intended as all wood removed from the forest not used for fuel. 
3 „Okrogli industrijski les“ je ves les, spravljen iz gozda, ki se ne uporablja za energetske namene.
4 forests are a source for products extracted from forests, including resin, tannin, fodder, medical plants, berries, nuts, roots, mushrooms, seeds and honey. 
4 Gozdovi so vir gozdnih proizvodov, vključno s smolo, taninom, krmo, zdravilnimi rastlinami, jagodičevjem, oreški, koreninami, gobami, semeni in medom.
5 dG agriculture and rural development H4, Report on the implementation of forestry measures under the rural development Regulation 1698/2005 for the period 2007–13, March 2009. another source indicates that in nine surveyed Member states 61 % of all private forest holdings have an area of less than 1 hectare and 86 % of all holdings belong to the size classes up to 5 hectares (Prospects for market supply of wood and other forest products from areas with fragmented forest‐ownership structures — Final study report, BoKu university, Vienna, 2010). 
5 GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, enota H4, Report on the implementation of forestry measures under the rural development Regulation 1698/2005 for the period 2007– 2013 (poročilo o izvajanju gozdarskih ukrepov v okviru uredbe o razvoju podeželja 1698/2005 za obdobje 2007–2013), marec 2009. Drug vir navaja, da je v devetih anketiranih državah članicah 61 % vseh zasebnih gozdnih posesti manjših od 1 hektarja, 86 % vseh posesti pa sodi v velikostne razrede do 5 hektarjev (Prospects for market supply of wood and other forest products from areas with fragmented forest‐ownership structures – Final study report (možnosti za tržno dobavo lesa in drugih gozdnih proizvodov z območij z razdrobljeno strukturo lastništva gozdov – poročilo o končni študiji), Univerza BOKU, Dunaj, 2010).
6 McpfE Liaison unit Warsaw, unEcE, fao, State of Europe’s forests 2007. 
9 6 Ministrska konferenca o varstvu gozdov v Evropi (MCPFE), enota za zvezo Varšava, UNECE, FAO, State of Europe’s forests 2007.
The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe, Warsaw, 2007, p. 
The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe (stanje evropskih gozdov v letu 2007 – poročilo MCPFE o trajnostnem gospodarjenju z gozdovi v Evropi), Varšava, 2007, str.
European forest sector outlook study, Geneva, 2005), p. 
European forest sector outlook study (ženevska študija o lesu in gozdu – študija o prihodnosti evropskega gozdarskega sektorja), Ženeva, 2005, str.
8 McpfE Liaison unit Warsaw, unicE, fao, State of Europe’s forests 2007. 
8 Ministrska konferenca o varstvu gozdov v Evropi (MCPFE), enota za zvezo Varšava, UNICE, FAO, Stanje evropskih gozdov v letu 2007.
The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe, Warsaw, 2007, p. 
State of Europe’s forests 2007.The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe (poročilo MCPFE o trajnostnem gospodarjenju z gozdovi v Evropi), Varšava, 2007, na str.
81: ‘the largest share of public forest is owned by the state (85 %), the rest mainly by cities, townships, municipalities and provincial governments’. 
81 navaja, da je največji del javnih gozdov v državni lasti (85 %), preostali del pa večinoma v lasti mest, občin in deželnih vlad.
9 Malta does not have wooded land. 9 Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development 
9 Malta nima gozdnih zemljišč. Posebno poročilo št. 8/2013 – Podpora Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja za povečanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov
GRApH 2 FOREST OwnERSHIp In THE EU Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Denmark Germany Estonia Ireland Greece Spain France Italy Cyprus Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Hungary Netherlands Austria Poland Portugal Romania Slovenia Slovakia Finland Sweden United Kingdom Source: Eurostat. 
dIaGram 2 lastnIštvo Gozdov v eU 10 Belgija Bolgarija Češka Danska Nemčija Estonija Irska Grčija Španija Francija Italija Ciper Latvija Litva Luksemburg Madžarska Nizozemska Avstrija Poljska Portugalska Romunija Slovenija Slovaška Finska Švedska Združeno kraljestvo Vir: Eurostat.
10 0 % 25 % Publicly owned 50 % Private (and other) ownership 100 % 75 % Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development 
0 % 25 % v javni lasti 50 % v zasebni (in drugi) lasti 75 % 100 % Posebno poročilo št. 8/2013 – Podpora Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja za povečanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov
11 EU FORESTRY pOLICY And SUppORT: HISTORICAL bACkGROUnd 5. until 1992, forestry-related Eu actions were linked to agricultural policy. at that time, a key priority was the development and exploitation of forestry activities on farms so as to offer an alternative activity and income to those engaged in agriculture10. since 1992, forestry support has been made available not only to farmers but also to other private persons and to local authorities11. 
Gozdarska PolItIka In PodPora eU: zGodovInsko ozadje 5. Do leta 1992 so bili ukrepi EU, namenjeni gozdarstvu, povezani s kmetijsko politiko. Takrat sta bili ključni prioriteti razvoj in izkoriščanje gozdarskih dejavnosti na kmetijah, da bi tistim, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom, ponudili dodatno dejavnost in dohodek.10 Od leta 1992 podpora za gozdarstvo ni na voljo samo kmetom, ampak tudi drugim fizičnim osebam in lokalnim organom.11 6.
6. in 1998, a council resolution on a ‘forestry strategy for the European union‘12 established a strategic framework for forest-related actions in support of sustainable forest management and the multifunctional role of forests based on the coordination of the forest policies of the Member states and the union. 
Svet je leta 1998 v svoji resoluciji o gozdarski strategiji Evropske unije12 določil strateški okvir za ukrepe, povezane z gozdovi, za podporo trajnostnemu gospodarjenju z gozdovi in večnamenski vlogi gozdov na podlagi usklajevanja gozdarskih politik držav članic in Unije. 7.
7. in 2006, the commission in cooperation with the Member states prepared an ‘Eu forest action plan’13 aimed at providing a framework for the implementation of forest-related actions at union and Member state level. in this plan, it is provided that the Member states may encourage investments to enhance the economic value of forests to strengthen the competitiveness and economic viability of forestry14. 
Komisija je leta 2006 v sodelovanju z državami članicami pripravila „Akcij-ski načrt EU za gozdove“13, ki naj bi zagotovil okvir za izvajanje ukrepov v zvezi z gozdovi na ravni Unije in držav članic. V njem je določeno, da lahko države članice spodbujajo naložbe za povečanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov, da okrepijo konkurenčnost in gospodarsko sposobnost preživetja gozdarstva.14 PolItIka razvoja Podeželja v obdobjU 2007–2013 8.
THE RURAL dEVELOpmEnT pOLICY 2007–13 8. the rd policy is implemented through multi-annual programming periods15 and is focused on three core objectives16, known as ‘thematic axes’, to be achieved through a series of financial support measures: ο improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector (‘axis 1’); ο improving the environment and the countryside (‘axis 2’); ο improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification of the rural economy (‘axis 3’). the rural development measures applicable to the forestry sector are mainly under axis 1 and 217. 
Politika RP se izvaja v večletnih programskih obdobjih15 in je osredotočena na tri osnovne cilje16, imenovane „tematske osi“, ki naj bi bili doseženi z nizom ukrepov finančne podpore: ο izboljšanje konkurenčnosti kmetijskega in gozdarskega sektorja („os 1“); ο izboljšanje okolja in podeželja („os 2“); ο izboljšanje kakovosti življenja na podeželju in spodbujanje diverzifikacije podeželskega gospodarstva („os 3“). Ukrepi razvoja podeželja, namenjeni gozdarskemu sektorju, so večinoma v okviru osi 1 in 2.17 10 Uredba Sveta (EGS) št.
10 council regulation (Ecc) no 4256/88 of 19 december 1988, laying down provisions for implementing regulation (EEc) no 2052/88 as regards the EaGGf Guidance section (oJ L 374, 31.12.1988, p. 
4256/88 z dne 19. decembra 1988 o izvajanju Uredbe (EGS) št. 2052/88 v zvezi z Usmerjevalnim oddelkom Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) (UL L 374, 31.12.1988, str.
25), council regulation (Ecc) no 1610/89 of 29 May 1989 laying down provisions for implementing regulation (EEc) no 4256/88 as regards the scheme to develop and optimally utilise woodlands in rural areas in the community (oJ L 165, 15.6.1989, p. 
1610/89 z dne 29. maja 1989 o izvajanju Uredbe (EGS) št. 4256/88 v zvezi s shemo za razvoj in optimalno rabo gozdnate pokrajine na podeželskih območjih v Skupnosti (UL L 165, 15.6.1989, str.
3), council regulation (Ecc) no 2328/91 of 15 July 1991 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures (oJ L 218, 6.8.1991, p. 
2328/91 z dne 15. julija 1991 o izboljšanju učinkovitosti kmetijskih struktur (UL L 218, 6.8.1991, str.
11 council regulation (Ecc) no 2080/92 of 30 June 1992 instituting a community aid scheme for forestry measures in agriculture (oJ L 215, 30.7.1992). 
2080/92 z dne 30. junija 1992 uvedbi programa pomoči Skupnosti za gozdarske ukrepe v kmetijstvu (UL L 215, 30.7.1992).
12 council resolution of 15 december 1998 on a forestry strategy for the European union (oJ c 56, 26.2.1999, p. 
12 Resolucija Sveta z dne 15. decembra 1998 o gozdarski strategiji Evropske unije (UL C 56, 26.2.1999, str.
13 coM(2006) 302 final of 15 June 2006. 
13 COM(2006) 302 final z dne 15. junija 2006.
14 coM(2006) 302 final, p. 
14 COM(2006) 302 final, str.
15 the Member states are responsible for drawing up rural development programmes and submitting them to the commission for approval. 
15 Države članice so odgovorne, da pripravijo načrte razvoja podeželja in jih predložijo v odobritev Komisiji.
Member states are also responsible for managing each rural development programme in an efficient and effective way and in particular for selecting operations for funding. the commission has to approve the rd programmes and check that management and control systems exist and function properly in the Member Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development 
Prav tako so odgovorne za učinkovito in uspešno upravljanje vsakega programa razvoja podeželja ter zlasti za izbiranje operacij za financiranje.
12 mEASURE 122: ImpROVEmEnT OF THE ECOnOmIC VALUE OF FORESTS 9. 
12 UkreP 122: Povečanje GosPodarske vrednostI Gozdov 9.
Measure 122 ‘improvement of the economic value of forests’ 18 is the only forestry-specific measure defined under axis 1 (improving the competitiveness of the agriculture and forestry sector). 
Ukrep 122 „izboljšanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov“18 je edini ukrep, namenjen izključno gozdarstvu, določen v okviru osi 1 (izboljšanje konkurenčnosti kmetijskega in gozdarskega sektorja).
Measure 122 is included in 49 rural development programmes drawn up by 17 Member states19. the total Eafrd support programmed for actions under the measure amounts to 534,72 million euro in the period 2007–13 while Eafrd payments corresponded to 137,13 million euro (see annex i for details on the allocation of financial resources for measure 122 and the amount of forest areas in private ownership by Member state). 
Ukrep 122 je vključen v 49 programov razvoja podeželja, ki jih je pripravilo 17 držav članic19. Skupna podpora EKSRP, določena v programu za dejavnosti ukrepa 122, v obdobju 2007–2013 znaša 534,72 milijona EUR, medtem ko so plačila EKSRP znašala 137,13 milijona EUR (glej Prilogo I za podrobnosti o dodelitvi finančnih sredstev za ukrep 122 in površino gozdnih površin v zasebni lasti po državah članicah).
10. the responsibility for the sound financial management of the budgetary expenditure for the measure ’improvement of the economic value of forests‘ is shared between the commission and the Member states. 
10. Odgovornost za dobro finančno poslovodenje proračunskih odhodkov za ukrep „povečanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov“ si delijo Komisija in države članice.
11. in the framework of this measure, Eafrd financial investment support can be granted for forests owned by private owners or their associations or by municipalities or their associations20. support is excluded for forests and other wooded land owned by central or regional governments, or by government-owned corporations, or owned by the crown, or by legal persons at least 50 % of whose capital is held by those entities21. it is expected that around 88 000 private or municipal forest owners will benefit 22 from the measure. as of 31 december 2011, a total of 20 662 investment projects had been approved by 15 Member states. 
11. V okviru tega ukrepa se lahko dodeli finančna podpora EKSRP za naložbe v gozdove zasebnih lastnikov oziroma njihovih združenj ali občin oziroma njihovih združenj20. Podpora se ne dodeli za gozdove in druga gozdna zemljišča v lasti centralne ali regionalnih vlad, državnih podjetij, monarhije ali pravnih oseb, katerih najmanj 50 % kapitala je v lasti teh subjektov.21 Po pričakovanjih bo ukrep koristil okoli 88 000 lastnikom zasebnih ali občinskih gozdov.22 Do 31. decembra 2011 je 15 držav članic odobrilo skupno 20 662 naložbenih projektov.
17 Measures no 122,123,124,125, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, as codified in annex ii to commission regulation (Ec) no 1974/2006 of 15 december 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of council regulation (Ec) no 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European agricultural fund for rural development (Eafrd) (oJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 
122, 123, 124, 125, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, kot so določeni v Prilogi II k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1974/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o podrobnih pravilih glede uporabe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
18 article 27 of regulation (Ec) no 1698/2005. 
18 Člen 27 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
19 BG, cZ, dE(1), EE, Es(7), fr (5), it(20), LV, Lt, Lu, Hu, at, pt(3), ro, si, sK, uK(2). 
19 BG, CZ, DE(1), EE, ES(7), FR(5), IT(20), LV, LT, LU, HU, AT, PT(3), RO, SI, SK, UK(2).
20 article 27 of regulation (Ec) no1698/2005. 
20 Člen 27 Uredbe (ES) št.
21 article 30(4) of regulation (Ec) 1974/2006. 
21 Člen 30(4) Uredbe (ES) št.
22 dG agriculture and rural development H4, Report on the implementation of forestry measures under the rural development Regulation 1698/2005 for the period 2007–13, March 2009. 
22 GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, enota H4, Report on the implementation of forestry measures under the rural development Regulation 1698/2005 for the period 2007‐ 2013 (Poročilo o izvajanju gozdarskih ukrepov v okviru uredbe o razvoju podeželja 1698/2005 za obdobje 2007–2013), marec 2009.
23 article 18 of regulation (Ec) no 1974/2006. 
23 Člen 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 1974/2006.
24 annexiofregulation(Ec) no 1698/2005, ‘amounts and rates of support’. 
24 Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št.
More specifically, the audit focused on the following issues: (a) is the design of the measure adequate? (b) is the implementation process appropriate? (c) is the assessment of the effectiveness of the measure satisfactory? 
Natančneje, revizija je bila osredotočena na naslednja vprašanja: (a) Ali je ukrep ustrezno zasnovan? (b) Ali se ukrep ustrezno izvaja? (c) Ali se uspešnost ukrepa zadovoljivo ocenjuje? 15.
16. the audit work comprised interviews with the responsible managing authorities, a review of the rdps and the relevant national or regional legislation and procedures, in particular those for selecting investment projects. a sample of 50 supported projects was visited on the spot to verify the effects of the investments (see annex ii for details). 
Te države članice so imele več kot 50 % vseh odhodkov, prijavljenih za ukrep 122 v sedanjem programskem obdobju 2007–2013. 16. Revizijsko delo je zajemalo pogovore s pristojnimi organi upravljanja, pregled PRP ter relevantne nacionalne ali regionalne zakonodaje in postopkov, zlasti tistih za izbiranje naložbenih projektov.
17. in addition, the court sent questionnaires to two Member states that have opted not to implement the measure even though their forestry sector is very important (finland and sweden) and to three Member states that had declared no expenditure or a very limited one by the end of 2010 though they initially planned large amounts of expenditure under the measure (Bulgaria, Greece and romania). 
17. Sodišče je poleg tega poslalo vprašalnike dvema državama članicama, ki se nista odločili za izvajanje ukrepa, čeprav imata zelo pomemben gozdarski sektor (Finska in Švedska), in trem državam članicam, ki do konca leta 2010 niso prijavile nobenih odhodkov ali pa zelo nizke, čeprav so na začetku v okviru ukrepa načrtovale visoke zneske odhodkov (Bolgarija, Grčija in Romunija).
Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development 14 oBSErvatIoNS SIGnIFICAnT wEAknESSES In THE dESIGn OF THE mEASURE wEAknESSES In THE OVERALL jUSTIFICATIOn OF THE mEASURE 18. the audit examined whether there was adequate justification supporting the design of the measure and its proposal. 
8/2013 – Podpora Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja za povečanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov 14 oPažanja velIke slabostI v zasnovI UkrePa slabostI v celotnI UtemeljItvI UkrePa 18.
19. in the preamble to the regulation25 it is stated that private forests play an important role in economic activity in rural areas and, therefore, Eu aid is important for improving and broadening their economic value, for increasing diversification of production and enhancing market opportunities, in sectors such as renewable energy, while maintaining the sustainable management and the multifunctional role of forests. the preamble to the regulation makes no explicit mention of forests owned by municipalities. 
Med revizijo je bilo preučeno, ali sta bila zasnova ukrepa in njegov predlog ustrezno utemeljena. 19. V uvodnih izjavah uredbe25 je navedeno, da imajo zasebni gozdovi v gospodarski dejavnosti podeželskih območij pomembno vlogo, zato je pomoč EU velikega pomena za izboljšanje in širjenje njihove gospodarske vrednosti, povečanje diverzifikacije proizvodnje in krepitev tržnih priložnosti v sektorjih, kot je na primer sektor obnovljivih virov energije, ob ohranjanju trajnostnega gospodarjenja in večnamenske vloge gozdov.
20. the audit did not find any specific commission sWot analysis26 of the situation in the forestry sector at Eu level justifying the proposal of specific financial support for improving the economic value of forests of private owners and municipalities or defining the public interest to which such a support should respond. 
20. Med revizijo ni bila odkrita nobena izrecna analiza SWOT26, ki bi jo v zvezi s stanjem gozdarskega sektorja na ravni EU opravila Komisija in s katero bi bil utemeljen predlog za posebno finančno podporo za povečanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov v zasebni lasti in v lasti občin ali v kateri bi bil opredeljen javni interes, na katerega naj bi se odzvala takšna podpora.
21. to justify measure 122 the commission services subsequently referred to standing forestry committee’s opinions and reports,27 which they considered would justify the proposal of measure 122. 
21. Za utemeljitev ukrepa 122 so se službe Komisije pozneje sklicevale na mnenja in poročila stalnega odbora za gozdarstvo27, ki so bila po njihovem mnenju utemeljitev predloga ukrepa 122.
However none of these opinions was available to the commission before the release of its proposal28 to the council on support for rural development by the Eafrd, which suggests a lack of due preparation. 
Vendar ni bilo nobeno od teh mnenj Komisiji na voljo, preden je svoj predlog o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz EKSRP28 predložila Svetu, kar kaže na pomanjkanje potrebne priprave.
Municipalities may in some cases be responsible for the management of forests owned by other local authorities. for example, in tuscany, the region delegated to the municipalities the management of regional forests. although there was in practice no difference for a municipality between the management of its own forests and the management of entrusted regional forests measure 122 could not be applied in regional forests, which suggests some incoherence in the measure. 
Občine so lahko v nekaterih primerih odgovorne za gospodarjenje z gozdovi v lasti drugih lokalnih organov. V Toskani, na primer, je bilo gospodarjenje z regionalnimi gozdovi preneseno z regije na občine, čeprav v praksi za občine ni bilo razlike med gospodarjenjem z njihovimi gozdovi in gospodarjenjem z regionalnimi gozdovi, ki so jih dobile v upravljanje.