natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This also affects the accuracy of the data reported in the EAAs37. 
To je vplivalo tudi na točnost podatkov, sporočenih v ERK37.
36 The EAAs show income results for each Member State as a whole but not at regional level. 
36 ERK kažejo rezultate o dohodkih za vsako državo članico kot celoto, ne pa na regionalni ravni.
Member States provide additional regional income data only on a voluntary basis, but these are not available for all relevant Member State regions and, where available, are provided only with a significant delay of 2 years. 
Države članice zagotovijo dodatne podatke o regionalnih dohodkih le na prostovoljni osnovi, vendar ti niso na voljo za vse zadevne regije držav članic, kadar so na voljo, pa se zagotovijo s precejšnjo zamudo dveh let.
This reduces the usefulness of the results for assessing the regional income situation in agriculture. 
To zmanjšuje uporabnost rezultatov za oceno regionalnih razmer na področju dohodkov v kmetijstvu.
37 By definition, the EAAs measure, at the macroeconomic level, economic performance and growth as a result of market activities and their evolution over time. 
37 ERK že po svoji opredelitvi merijo – na makroekonomski ravni – gospodarsko uspešnost in rast kot rezultat tržnih dejavnosti in njun razvoj skozi čas.
They do not account for public goods provided by farmers to society. 
Ne upoštevajo javnih dobrin, ki jih kmetje zagotavljajo družbi.
The provision of such public goods is an important specific objective of measures such as the ‘greening payment’, which accounts for 30 % of the EU direct payments. 
Zagotavljanje teh javnih dobrin je pomemben posebni cilj ukrepov, kot so „zelena plačila”, ki pomenijo 30 % neposrednih plačil EU.
It emphasises the multifunctional role of agriculture, while also contributing to the income of farmers. 
Poudarja večnamensko vlogo kmetijstva, obenem pa prispeva k dohodku kmetov.
The extent to which agriculture produces public goods and its evaluation by society may, however, vary significantly across regions and Member States. 
V kakšnem obsegu kmetijstvo proizvaja javne dobrine in koliko družba to ceni, pa se lahko med regijami in državami članicami razlikuje.
So far, the Commission has not considered developing the EAAs further or established any other instrument to measure the economic value of public goods produced by the agricultural sector as a whole. 
Komisija doslej še ni razmišljala o nadaljnjem razvoju ERK ali vzpostavila kakšnega drugega instrumenta za merjenje ekonomske vrednosti javnih dobrin, ki jih proizvaja kmetijski sektor kot celota.
36 See paragraph 97 of Special Report No 5/2011, ‘Single Payment Scheme (SPS): Issues to be addressed to improve its sound financial management’, and paragraph 74 of Special Report No 16/2012, ‘The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States’ (http://eca.europa.eu). 
36 Glej odstavek 97 Posebnega poročila št. 5/2011 – Shema enotnega plačila (SEP): vprašanja, ki jih je treba obravnavati za izboljšanje njenega dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, in odstavek 74 Posebnega poročila št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah (http://eca. europa.eu).
37 See paragraph 56. 
37 Glej odstavek 56.
Observations 22 The use of certain EAA information by the Commission can be improved 38 The EAAs are designed to provide information on changes in the income of the agricultural sector as a whole, rather than on absolute income levels, the income of individual agricultural holdings or of households employed in agriculture. 
Opažanja 22 Komisija bi lahko bolje uporabljala nekatere informacije ERK 38 ERK so zasnovani tako, da zagotavljajo informacije o spremembah pri dohodkih v kmetijskem sektorju kot celoti, ne pa o absolutnih ravneh dohodkov, dohodkih posameznih kmetijskih gospodarstev ali gospodinjstev, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom.
As such, they are not designed for drawing detailed conclusions at a microeconomic level such as on the economic viability of individual holdings and the standard of living of farm households. 
Kot taki niso zasnovani za pripravo natančnih zaključkov na mikroeko-nomski ravni, na primer o ekonomski sposobnosti preživetja posameznih gospodarstev in življenjski ravni gospodinjstev kmetij.
Nevertheless, in its annual activity reports and its annual statistical and economic information reports, the Commission uses EAA information at micro level by employing comparisons of the agricultural factor income per worker38 in absolute values as a key performance indicator. 
Kljub temu Komisija v svojih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih in letnih poročilih o statističnih in gospodarskih informacijah uporablja informacije ERK na mikro ravni, tako da uporablja primerjave faktorskih dohodkov kmetijstva na delavca38 v absolutnih vrednostih kot ključni kazalnik smotrnosti poslovanja.
However, the EAAs are not expressly designed to provide data on absolute income levels or on the income levels of individual farmers. 
Vendar pa ERK niso izrecno zasnovani za zagotavljanje podatkov o absolutnih ravneh dohodkov ali o ravneh dohodkov posameznih kmetov.
39 The Commission uses the indicator ’agricultural entrepreneurial income’39 as a proxy for ‘family farm income’40 and considers it to be the closest indicator for the standard of living of the farmers. 
39 Komisija uporablja kazalnik „podjetniški dohodek kmetijstva”39 kot približek za „dohodek družinske kmetije”40 in meni, da je to najboljši kazalnik za življenjsko raven kmetov.
However, this assumption no longer reflects the reality of agriculture in the EU, because the farming population varies significantly across Member States and no longer contains only individual (‘family’) holdings managed by sole proprietors who receive no payment for their work but also a significant share of legal entities or group holdings, which almost exclusively use paid labour41. 
Vendar pa ta domneva ne odraža več realnega stanja v kmetijstvu EU, ker se obseg kmetijskega prebivalstva med državami članicami zelo razlikuje in ne zajema več le („družinskih”) gospodarstev, ki jih upravljajo posamezni lastniki, ki ne prejemajo plačila za svoje delo, temveč tudi velik delež pravnih oseb ali skupinskih gospodarstev, ki skoraj izključno uporabljajo plačano delovno silo41.
The latter are often conventional companies (e.g. investors buying large land tracts for intensive farming), as in other sectors of the economy. 
Slednja so pogosto običajna podjetja (npr. vlagatelji, ki kupijo velike površine zemljišč za intenzivno kmetovanje), kot je značilno za druge gospodarske sektorje.
EAA income results can thus not clearly be attributed to ‘family farms’ and cannot be taken as a proxy for the income or standard of living of individual farmers. 
Rezultatov o dohodkih iz ERK zato ni mogoče jasno pripisati „družinskim kmetijam” in jih šteti kot približek za dohodek ali življenjsko raven posameznih kmetov.
As the share of individual holdings across Member States also varies significantly, income results, as provided by the EAAs, are not comparable between Member States42. 
Ker se tudi delež gospodarstev samostojnih kmetov po državah članicah zelo razlikuje, rezultati o dohodku, kot jih zagotavljajo ERK, niso primerljivi med državami članicami42.
38 Agricultural factor income represents income generated by farming which is used to remunerate borrowed or rented production factors (capital, wages and land rents), and own production factors (own labour, capital and land. 
38 Faktorski dohodek kmetijstva pomeni dohodek iz kmetovanja, ki se uporablja za nadomestila za izposojene ali najete proizvodne faktorje (kapital, plače in najemnine za zemljišča) in za lastne proizvodne faktorje (lastno delo, kapital in zemljišča).
39 This is the remuneration for the work performed by the farmer plus the income remaining after deduction of the costs for salaried labour and provides information on trends in the development of agricultural income of independent farm businesses. 
39 To je nadomestilo za delo, ki ga opravi kmet, skupaj z dohodkom, ki ostane po odbitku stroškov za plačano delo, in zagotavlja informacije o trendih v razvoju kmetijskih dohodkov neodvisnih kmetijskih podjetij.
40 See Annex III. 
40 Glej Prilogo III.
41 According to the FSS 2010, legal entities farmed 27 % of the EU’s agricultural area. 
41 Glede na raziskovanje strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev 2010 so pravni subjekti kmetovali na 27 % kmetijskih površin EU.
The share increased significantly with the 2004 and 2007 enlargements of the EU. 
Delež se je s širitvama EU v letih 2004 in 2007 znatno povečal.
42 See also point 5.12 of Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 138/2004. 
42 Glej tudi točko 5.12 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 138/2004.
Observations 23 The FADN is a well-established source of income and business information on commercial agricultural holdings but it has limitations 40 The FADN aims to collect representative accounts data on commercial agricultural holdings43. 
Opažanja 23 Mreža FADN je dobro uveljavljen vir dohodkovnih in poslovnih informacij o komercialnih kmetijskih gospodarstvih, vendar ima omejitve 40 Namen mreže FADN je zbirati reprezentativne podatke iz računov o komercialnih kmetijskih gospodarstvih43.
It can provide important and useful information about the business performance of agricultural holdings per agricultural sector and size class. 
Mreža lahko zagotavlja pomembne in koristne informacije o poslovni uspešnosti kmetijskih gospodarstev po kmetijskih sektorjih in velikostnih razredih.
It is thus a primary source of information for the evaluation of the performance of CAP measures44. 
Zato je glavni vir informacij za oceno smotrnosti poslovanja pri izvajanju ukrepov SKP44.
41 Following the Court’s Special Report No 14/2003, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States’ liaison agencies, has been developing the FADN methodology to take account of the evolution of the agricultural sector. 
41 Komisija na podlagi posebnega poročila Sodišča št. 14/2003 v sodelovanju z organi za zvezo v državah članicah razvija metodologijo FADN za upoštevanje razvoja kmetijskega sektorja.
It has also taken steps to bring the FADN results closer to international accounting and financial reporting standards. 
Sprejela je tudi ukrepe, s katerimi želi rezultate FADN približati mednarodnim računovodskim standardom in standardom računovodskega poročanja.
Income indicators do not fully take account of the evolution of holdings in the agricultural sector 42 The main income indicator of the FADN is ‘farm net value added’. 
Kazalniki dohodka ne odražajo v celoti razvoja gospodarstev v kmetijskem sektorju 42 Glavni kazalnik dohodka FADN je neto dodana vrednost kmetije.
It is useful for comparing the income performance of farms irrespective of their organisational form. 
Uporaben je za primerjavo uspešnosti dohodka kmetij ne glede na njihovo organizacijsko obliko.
As it does not take into account the costs of external production factors (e.g. land rent or bank interest), which many farmers have to bear, it cannot provide sufficient information about the actual agricultural income of farmers or the profitability of the holdings. 
Ker ne upošteva stroškov zunanjih proizvodnih faktorjev (npr. najemnin za zemljišča ali bančnih obresti), ki jih morajo kriti mnogi kmetje, ne more zagotavljati dovolj informacij o dejanskem kmetijskem dohodku kmetov ali donosnosti gospodarstev.
43 Historically, the FADN was designed to provide information on ‘family farms’, and an important indicator used is the ‘farm net income per family work unit’ for holdings which use the labour and capital of the holders and their families. 
43 Mreža FADN je bila prvotno zasnovana za zagotavljanje informacij o „družinskih kmetijah” in pomemben kazalnik, ki se uporablja, je neto dohodek kmetije na družinsko delovno enoto za gospodarstva, ki uporabljajo delovno silo in kapital imetnika in njegove družine.
It is calculated only for holdings for which unremunerated family labour has been recorded. 
Izračuna se samo za gospodarstva, za katera je bilo neplačano delo družinskih članov evidentirano.
However, companies owned by single holders or a group of holders set up for tax purposes, which are similar to family farms in all but legal form, are excluded, because they do not have unremunerated labour. 
Vendar pa so podjetja, ki so v lasti enega samega imetnika ali skupine imetnikov in so bile ustanovljene v davčne namene ter so v vsem razen po pravni obliki podobne družinskim kmetijam, pri tem izvzete, ker nimajo neplačanega dela.
Such structures are however frequent in many Member States, notably in Germany, Spain and France, and their exclusion is likely to distort the results45. 
Takšne strukture so kljub temu pogoste v številnih državah članicah, zlasti v Nemčiji, Španiji in Franciji, zato njihova izključitev verjetno popači rezultate45.
43 Holdings which exceed a minimum economic size. 
43 Gospodarstva, ki presegajo najmanjšo ekonomsko velikost.
44 The Commission’s evaluation of income effects of direct support and the impact assessment for ‘Common agricultural policy towards 2020’, both of which the Commission conducted in 2011, are essentially based on FADN data. 
44 Ocena učinkov neposredne podpore na dohodke in ocena učinka za sporočilo „Skupna kmetijska politika proti letu 2020“, ki ju je Komisija opravila leta 2011, temeljita predvsem na podatkih FADN.
45 In Spain more than 30 % of the agricultural area is farmed by legal entities, many of them set up for tax purposes. 
45 VŠpanijisenavečkot30% kmetijskih površin s kmetijstvom ukvarjajo pravni subjekti, od katerih jih je bilo veliko ustanovljenih v davčne namene.
In France legal entities and group holdings farm 58 % of the agricultural area and in Germany more than one third. 
V Franciji se pravne osebe in skupinska gospodarstva s kmetijstvom ukvarjajo na 58 % kmetijskih površin, v Nemčiji pa več kot na eni tretjini.
Observations 24 44 Furthermore, there is no separate income indicator for farms organised as conventional companies, although such legal entities play a major role in the agricultural sector in many Member States. 
Opažanja 24 44 Poleg tega ne obstaja poseben kazalnik dohodka za kmetije, organizirane kot običajna podjetja, čeprav imajo takšni pravni subjekti v številnih državah članicah pomembno vlogo v kmetijskem sektorju.
Information about other farm-related incomes of farmers is incomplete 45 Revenue from financial investments, capital transfers and the favourable effects of taxation on agricultural income can significantly impact the income and financial situation of a holding and its ability to react to market forces. 
Informacije o drugih s kmetijo povezanih dohodkih kmetov so nepopolne 45 Prihodki iz finančnih naložb, kapitalskih transferjev in ugodnih vplivov obdavčevanja na kmetijske dohodke lahko znatno vplivajo na dohodke in finančno stanje kmetijskega gospodarstva in njegovo zmožnost za odzivanje na tržne sile.
The current FADN methodology does not, however, take such effects into account. 
Vendar pa sedanja metodologija FADN teh vplivov ne upošteva.
46 Many farmers also use the resources of their holdings to engage in gainful activities other than primary agricultural production or otherwise diversify their business activities to increase their income. 
46 Mnogi kmetje uporabljajo vire svojih gospodarstev za sodelovanje v pridobitnih dejavnostih, ki ne spadajo v primarno kmetijsko proizvodnjo, ali drugače razširjajo svoje poslovne dejavnosti, da bi si povečali dohodek.
Examples of such farm-related activities are the processing of food on farms, the direct sale of products, providing services using agricultural equipment, the production of renewable energy and agri-tourism. 
Primeri takšnih s kmetijo povezanih dejavnosti so predelava hrane na kmetiji, neposredna prodaja proizvodov, opravljanje storitev z uporabo kmetijske opreme, proizvodnja energije iz obnovljivih virov ali kmečki turizem.
Such activities provide additional income, reduce income volatility and make farmers less dependent on subsidies. 
Te dejavnosti ustvarjajo dodatni dohodek, zmanjšujejo nestabilnost dohodkov in zmanjšujejo odvisnost kmetov od subvencij.
Renewable energy can provide additional sources of income to farmers © European Union 2008. 
Obnovljivi viri energije lahko kmetom zagotavljajo dodatne vire dohodka ©Evropska unija, 2008.
Source: EC Audiovisual Service. 
Vir: Avdiovizualna služba Evropske komisije.
Photo: L. Chamussy Picture 
Fotografija: L. Chamussy.
Observations 25 47 More detailed information on other farm-related incomes has been collected only since 201446. 
Opažanja 25 47 Podrobnejše informacije o drugih s kmetijo povezanih dohodkih se zbirajo šele od leta 201446.
However, this information is included only where revenue and costs cannot be separated from agricultural activities in the holdings’ accounts. 
Vendar pa se te informacije vključijo le, če prihodkov in stroškov v računih gospodarstev ni mogoče ločiti od kmetijskih dejavnosti.
Information remains incomplete, because in other cases it is not included, for example when such an activity is managed in separate business units belonging to the farmer. 
Informacije ostanejo nepopolne, saj v drugih primerih niso vključene, na primer če se takšna dejavnost upravlja v ločenih poslovnih enotah, ki pripadajo kmetu.
Data collected are also not representative, because such holdings are currently under-represented in the FADN sample and, due to differences in accounting treatment, the data are not comparable across Member States (see Box 2). 
Zbrani podatki tudi niso reprezentativni, ker so tovrstna gospodarstva trenutno premalo zastopana v vzorcu FADN, zaradi razlik pri računovodski obdelavi pa podatki niso primerljivi po državah članicah (glej okvir 2).
Consequently, there is an incomplete picture of farmers’ actual farm-related business activities and the role which additional sources of revenue play in the stabilisation of their overall income. 
Zaradi tega je slika poslovnih dejavnosti kmetov, ki so dejansko povezane s kmetijo, in vloge, ki jo imajo dodatni viri prihodkov pri stabilizaciji njihovega celotnega dohodka, nepopolna.
46 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 385/2012 of 30 April 2012 on the farm return to be used for determining the incomes of agricultural holdings and analysing the business operation of such holdings (OJ L 127, 15.5.2012, p. 1). 
385/2012 z dne 30. aprila 2012 o obliki poročila s kmetijskega gospodarstva, ki se uporablja za določanje dohodkov in analizo gospodarskega delovanja kmetijskih gospodarstev (UL L 127, 15.5.2012, str. 1).
Inconsistent treatment of other farm-related incomes of farmers According to the 2010 FSS, more than 30 % of the holdings in Germany declared that they had business activities outside agriculture. 
Nedosledno obravnavanje drugih s kmetijo povezanih dohodkov kmetov Glede na raziskovanje strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev 2010 je več kot 30 % gospodarstev v Nemčiji prijavilo poslovne dejavnosti zunaj kmetijstva.
The governing element for the classification of the income in the FADN is however the national tax law, according to which operating revenues which do not come from primary agricultural production are only considered to be agricultural income within narrow limits. 
Glavni element za razvrstitev dohodka v FADN pa je nacionalna davčna zakonodaja, v skladu s katero se operativni prihodki, ki ne izvirajo iz primarne kmetijske proizvodnje, štejejo kot kmetijski dohodek le v zelo ozkih mejah.
If these limits are exceeded, the revenue is not recorded in the FADN. 
Če so te meje presežene, se prihodki ne evidentirajo v FADN.
Many holdings operate biogas plants and produce and sell electricity to the national grid. 
Številna gospodarstva imajo obrate za pridobivanje bioplina ter za nacionalno omrežje proizvajajo in prodajajo električno energijo.
As this revenue is classified as ‘non-agricultural’, it is not considered to be directly related to the holding and does not appear in the FADN results. 
Tovrstni prihodki so razvrščeni kot „nekmetijski”, zato se ne štejejo kot neposredno povezani z gospodarstvom in niso razvidni v rezultatih FADN.
In France, income from other gainful activities related to the farm such as the processing of agricultural products, agricultural services, renting out land or buildings (including rental income for the installation of wind energy plants or solar panels and sale of electricity) are included only as long as they are performed by the same holding and as long as the revenue from such activities does not exceed a certain amount47. 
V Franciji so dohodki od drugih pridobitnih dejavnosti, povezanih s kmetijo, na primer predelava kmetijskih proizvodov, kmetijske storitve, oddajanje zemljišč ali zgradb v najem (vključno z dohodki od najemnin za namestitev obratov za pridobivanje energije vetra ali sončnih panelov ter prodaje električne energije), vključeni le, če te dejavnosti izvaja isto gospodarstvo in če prihodki od teh dejavnosti ne presegajo določenega zne-ska47.
Otherwise, it is not included in the FADN. 
V nasprotnem primeru niso vključeni v FADN.
In both cases the FADN only incompletely reflects the actual level of diversification. 
V obeh primerih FADN le delno odraža dejansko stopnjo diverzifikacije.
In the Netherlands, a good practice was noted whereby data collection on other gainful activities allows for a better assessment of the income situation of farmers. 
Na Nizozemskem zbiranje podatkov o drugih pridobitnih dejavnostih omogoča boljšo oceno dohodkovnega položaja kmetov, kar je primer dobre prakse.
According to the Dutch 2012 FADN results, holdings which had other gainful activities beside primary agricultural production received an average of 51 000 euro from these activities. 
Glede na rezultate FADN za leto 2012 za Nizozemsko so gospodarstva, ki so imela poleg primarne kmetijske proizvodnje še druge pridobitne dejavnosti, v povprečju prejela 51 000 EUR iz teh dejavnosti.
47 As a rule 30 % of the holding’s annual turnover or 50 000 euro, whichever is the lower. Box 2 
47 Praviloma 30 % letnega prometa gospodarstva ali 50 000 EUR, odvisno od tega, kateri znesek je nižji. Okvir 2
Observations 26 The FADN is not designed to be representative of CAP beneficiaries 48 The survey underpinning the FADN is designed to represent the largest possible share of agricultural output, agricultural area and farm labour for these holdings. 
Opažanja 26 Mreža FADN ni zasnovana tako, da bi bila reprezentativna za upravičence SKP 48 Raziskovanje, na katerem temelji FADN, je zasnovano tako, da naj bi predstavljalo največji možni delež kmetijske proizvodnje, kmetijskih površin in delovne sile kmetije za ta gospodarstva.
For this purpose, all holdings are classified on the basis of a standardised output value, which reflects in general terms the value of their agricultural production. 
V ta namen se vsa gospodarstva razvrstijo na podlagi standardizirane vrednosti proizvodnje, ki na splošno odraža vrednost njihove kmetijske proizvodnje.
However, the minimum standard output threshold varies between Member States, as does the coverage of the total farming population and beneficiaries of EU support (see Table). 
Vendar pa se pragovi najnižjega možnega standardnega rezultata med državami članicami razlikujejo, prav tako kot pokritost celotnega kmetijskega prebivalstva in upravičencev do podpore EU (glej tabelo).
49 While the approach used is justified from the Member States’ point of view, because the economic size of holdings varies significantly across the EU, this limits FADN-based comparisons of income across Member States. 
49 Uporabljeni pristop je z vidika držav članic utemeljen, saj se ekonomska velikost gospodarstev v EU precej razlikuje, vendar to omejuje primerjavo dohodka po državah članicah na podlagi FADN.
As an example, for a holding with a standard output of 10 000 euro per year in Spain, no comparable data are available in Germany, France or the Netherlands, because such holdings are not included in the survey. 
Za gospodarstvo s standardnim rezultatom v višini 10 000 EUR na leto v Španiji na primer ni primerljivih podatkov na voljo v Nemčiji, v Franciji ali na Nizozemskem, saj taka gospodarstva niso vključena v raziskovanje.