natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For all practical purposes, GAEC is now the pertinent concept as farmers must respect GAEC obligations in order to be entitled to the full payment of either SPS or SAPS aid. Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
Za vse praktične namene je zdaj relevanten pojem dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev, saj morajo kmetje spoštovati obveznosti v zvezi z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji, da so upravičeni do celotnega plačila pomoči iz SEP ali SEPP. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
ANNEX II 37 Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States INCOME SUPPORT PAID UNDER THE SAPS IN THE FINANCIAL YEARS FROM 2005 TO 2011 Financial year Bulgaria Czech Estonia Cyprus Latvia Republic Lithuania Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia TOTAL 2005 0,0 2006 0,0 2007 0,0 2008 166,3 2009 208,5 2010 272,1 2011 289,7 212,4 21,2 7,9 25,1 255,5 27,8 13,6 38,4 309,6 35,1 16,9 48,4 354,7 40,5 19,4 55,5 437,3 50,6 24,6 69,5 517,0 60,6 28,7 83,6 580,6 70,5 29,9 95,1 81,8 103,3 128,2 146,3 183,5 220,1 261,1 316,0 373,4 445,4 508,3 639,4 771,1 831,7 702,0 0,0 82,8 1 449,2 1 721,3 2 082,9 2 974,5 3 723,5 4 461,0 5 084,4 TOTAL 936,6 2 667,1 306,3 141,0 415,6 1 124,3 3 885,3 8 646,0 2 258,4 1 116,2 21 496,8 Source: EAGF Annual Reports on Financial Years 2005–11. 
PRILOGA II 37 Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah DOHODKOVNA PODPORA, PLAČANA IZ SEPP V PRORAČUNSKIH LETIH OD 2005 DO 2011 Proračunsko leto Bolgarija Češka Estonija Ciper Latvija Litva Madžarska Poljska Romunija Slovaška SKUPAJ 2005 0,0 2006 0,0 2007 0,0 2008 166,3 2009 208,5 2010 272,1 2011 289,7 212,4 21,2 7,9 25,1 255,5 27,8 13,6 38,4 309,6 35,1 16,9 48,4 354,7 40,5 19,4 55,5 437,3 50,6 24,6 69,5 517,0 60,6 28,7 83,6 580,6 70,5 29,9 95,1 81,8 103,3 128,2 146,3 183,5 220,1 261,1 316,0 373,4 445,4 508,3 639,4 771,1 831,7 702,0 807,1 977,3 1 123,9 1 401,6 1 671,6 1 962,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 420,1 528,8 611,0 698,5 82,8 102,2 122,0 139,5 179,7 225,2 264,8 1 449,2 1 721,3 2 082,9 2 974,5 3 723,5 4 461,0 5 084,4 SKUPAJ 936,6 2 667,1 306,3 141,0 415,6 1 124,3 3 885,3 8 646,0 2 258,4 1 116,2 21 496,8 Vir: Letna poročila EKJS za proračunska leta 2005–2011. (v milijonih EUR)
38 ANNEX III Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME SUPPORT UNDER THE SAPS (APPLICATION YEAR 2010) Annual payment of SAPS support (in euro) Number of beneficiaries Bulgaria Czech Republic Estonia Cyprus Latvia Lithuania Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia < 500 ≥ 500 and < 5 000 ≥ 5 000 and < 10 000 ≥ 10 000 and < 50 000 ≥ 50 000 and < 100 000 ≥ 100 000 and < 300 000 ≥ 300 000 and < 500 000 ≥ 500 000 63 377 21 359 2 608 2 952 862 529 26 3 822 12 724 3 174 3 776 818 1 170 303 5662 22373 33144 92613 58940 8167 8779 29128 68918 94003 908 598 1522 4773 11170 1101 420 1174 3348 11469 164 17 132 259 1031 954 443 114 179 6 055 13450 7699 1317 TOTAL 3 046 474 91 728 25 892 16 098 32 191 65 147 170 068 177 645 1 367 874 1 083 992 15 839 1 761 219 1 164 925 62 135 46 706 6 060 4 396 746 520 945 801 055 30 515 5 900 6 613 812 Source: European Court of Auditors based on European Commission payment data (CATS). 
38 PRILOGA III Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah PORAZDELITEV DOHODKOVNE PODPORE IZ SEPP (LETO ODDAJE ZAHTEVKOV 2010) Letno plačilo podpore iz SEPP (v EUR) Število upravičencev Bolgarija Češka Estonija Ciper Latvija Litva Madžarska Poljska Romunija Slovaška < 500 ≥ 500 in < 5 000 ≥ 5 000 in < 10 000 ≥ 10 000 in < 50 000 ≥ 50 000 in < 100 000 ≥ 100 000 in < 300 000 ≥ 300 000 in < 500 000 ≥ 500 000 63 377 21 359 2 608 2 952 862 529 26 3 822 12 724 3 174 3 776 818 1 170 303 5662 22373 33144 92613 8167 8779 29128 68918 908 598 1522 4773 1101 420 1174 3348 58 940 94 003 11 170 11 469 954 443 114 179 6 055 13450 7699 1317 SKUPAJ 3 046 474 91 728 25 892 16 098 32 191 65 147 170 068 177 645 1 367 874 1 083 992 15 839 1 761 219 1 164 925 62 135 46 706 6 060 4 396 746 520 945 801 055 30 515 5 900 6 613 812 164 17 132 259 1031 90 4 45 145 771 566 440 636 6 0 2 10 184 56 30 129 287 15 105 0 0 0 2 77 20 21 47 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi podatkov Evropske komisije o plačilih (CATS).
39 REPLY OF THE COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. As a transitional scheme, SAPS has been designed along the same principles as SPS but with the absence of entitlements. 
1267 1125 385 39 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE POVZETEK I. SEPP kot prehodna shema je bila zasnovana v skladu z istimi načeli kot SEP, vendar brez pravic.
Originally, the transition period was to end at the end of 2006, but at the new Member States’ request it could be extended by two years until the end of 2008 at the latest. 
Prvotno naj bi se prehodno obdobje končalo ob koncu leta 2006, vendar ga je bilo mogoče na zahtevo novih držav članic podaljšati za dve leti, največ do konca leta 2008.
In the meantime it was extended until the end of 2013. 
Medtem je bilo podaljšano do konca leta 2013.
SAPS was meant to be a ‘simplified scheme’ to allow the new Member States to manage direct payments with simpler rules. 
SEPP naj bi bila„poenostavljena shema“, da bi državam članicam omogočila enostavnejša pravila za upravljanje neposrednih plačil.
The Commission is addressing this issue in the legislative proposals on the CAP towards 2020 (a definition of an active farmer). 
Komisija to vprašanje obravnava v zakonodajnih predlogih o skupni kmetijski politiki (SKP) do leta 2020 (opredelitev aktivnega kmeta).
The SAPS is a decoupled scheme, and hence it entails no production requirement. 
SEPP je nevezana shema in zato ne pomeni nobenih zahtev glede proizvodnje.
Any farmer receiving support must however perform an agricultural activity. 
Vendar pa mora vsak kmet, ki prejema podporo, izvajati kmetijsko dejavnost.
Following Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 this implies that he should at least maintain his land in good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC). 
73/2009 to pomeni, da mora svoja zemljišča obdelovati vsaj v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji (GAEC).
In this context, a farmer should not be considered as having no agricultural activity simply because he does not maintain a certain production level. 
V zvezi s tem se ne sme šteti, da kmet nima kmetijske dejavnosti le zato, ker ne ohranja določene ravni proizvodnje.
From 2010, Member States have had the possibility to exclude from the benefit of direct payment natural or legal persons whose agricultural activities form only an insignificant part of their overall economic activities or whose principal business or company objectives do not consist of exercising an agricultural activity. Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
Države članice imajo od leta 2010 možnost, da fizične ali pravne osebe, katerih kmetijske dejavnosti predstavljajo le majhen delež vseh gospodarskih dejavnosti ali katerih glavna dejavnost ali dejavnost družbe ni opravljanje kmetijske dejavnosti, izključijo iz upravičenosti do neposrednega plačila. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
40 V. The Commission takes note of the Court’s finding on identification of eligible parcels. 
40 V. Komisija je seznanjena s presojo Sodišča glede opredelitve upravičenih parcel.
However, new Member States used the best available information at the time of establishing their land parcel identification system (LPIS). 
Vendar pa so nove države članice pri vzpostavljanju svojega identifikacijskega sistema za zemljišča (LPIS) uporabile najboljše razpoložljive informacije.
With audit missions and Action Plans the Commission supported new MS in their effort to improve the quality of the information in their LPIS. 
Komisija je z revizijskimi misijami in akcijskimi načrti podprla nove države članice v prizadevanjih za izboljšanje kakovosti informacij v njihovem LPIS.
The definition of land eligible for SAPS obliges new MS to exclude from the payment unutilised agricultural land (not farmed for various reasons, e.g. economic or social factors). 
V skladu z opredelitvijo zemljišča, ki je upravičeno do SEPP, so nove države članice zavezane, da kmetijska zemljišča, ki niso v uporabi (na katerih se kmetijske dejavnosti zaradi različnih razlogov, npr. gospodarskih ali socialnih dejavnikov, ne izvajajo), izključijo iz plačila.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION VII. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE VII.
The possibility to regionalise SAPS payments does not exist, as SAPS is a transitory scheme towards SPS regional payments. 
Regionalizacija plačil iz SEPP ni mogoča, ker je SEPP shema prehoda na regionalna plačila SEP.
Hence, in case a Member State would have liked to differentiate the level of payments between regions, it could have done so by introducing the SPS or since 2010 through the specific aid under Article 131 of Regulation 73/2009. 
Zato bi država članica, ki bi želela spremeniti raven plačil med regijami, to lahko storila z uvedbo SEP ali od leta 2010 s posebno pomočjo v skladu s členom 131 Uredbe št. 73/2009.
Besides, measures under rural development programmes (Less-favoured Areas payments) exist to support disadvantaged regions. 
Poleg tega za podporo prikrajšanih regij obstajajo ukrepi v okviru programov za razvoj podeželja (plačila za območja z omejenimi možnostmi).
The level of direct payments in the Member States is the result of a political compromise, which was, however, based on clearly defined criteria and historic reference periods. 
Raven neposrednih plačil v državah članicah je rezultat političnega kompromisa, ki pa je temeljil na jasno določenih merilih in preteklih referenčnih obdobjih.
The CAP instruments are continuously analysed by the Commission, in particular via policy evaluations. 
Komisija nenehno analizira instrumente SKP, zlasti prek vrednotenj politik.
As far as the direct payments are concerned, evaluation of the different impacts has been divided by subject. 
Pri neposrednih plačilih je vrednotenje različnih vplivov razdeljeno po temah.
An evaluation of the income effect of direct support has been published in 20112 and an evaluation is now ongoing on the structural effect of direct support. 
Leta 2011 je bilo objavljeno ovrednotenje učinka neposredne podpore na dohodek2, trenutno pa poteka vrednotenje strukturnega učinka neposredne podpore.
Results are expected for the end of the second semester 2013. 
Izidi so pričakovani konec drugega semestra leta 2013.
SAPS being a derogation to SPS, its effects are assessed together with the SPS in the framework of this evaluation. 
Ker SEPP predstavlja odstopanje od SEP, so v okviru tega vrednotenja njeni učinki ocenjeni skupaj s SEP.
The capitalisation of support into land prices in a regional model of SPS or in SAPS may be indeed higher than in a historic model. 
Kapitalizacija podpore v cenah zemljišč v regionalnem modelu SEP ali v SEPP je dejansko lahko večja kot v preteklem modelu.
The functioning of land markets in the EU Member States under the influence of measures applied under the CAP was assessed in a study ordered by the Commission services3. 
V študiji, ki so jo naročile službe Komisije, je bilo ocenjeno delovanje zemljiških trgov v državah članicah EU pod vplivom ukrepov, ki se izvajajo v okviru SKP3.
Nevertheless, among factors influencing land prices, CAP subsidies have a rather modest impact. 
Subvencije SKP imajo med dejavniki, ki vplivajo na cene zemljišč, sicer bolj skromen učinek.
In addition it does not necessarily mean an increase in capitalisation as compared to former coupled forms of support. 
Poleg tega v primerjavi s prejšnjimi vezanimi oblikami pomoči ne pomenijo nujno povečanja kapitalizacije.
2 http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/income/index_en.htm 3 http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/landmarkets/ index_en.htm Whenever Commission audits find ineligible land in the land parcel identification systems, deficiencies found are followed up in the context of clearance of accounts. 
2 http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/income/index_en.htm 3 http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/landmarkets/ index_en.htm Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
41 X. Regulation 73/2009 in Article 122(3) established that SAPS must be available until 31 December 2013. 
41 X. V členu 122(3) Uredbe št.
It follows that with new CAP, SAPS will cease to exist and new Member States have been aware of this condition already since January 2009 when the regulation was published. 
Iz tega sledi, da bo SEPP po novi SKP prenehala obstajati, česar se nove države članice zavedajo že od objave Uredbe januarja 2009.
New Member States can decide every year to introduce the standard scheme (SPS) and the Commission held several technical consultations with some interested new Member States on this issue. 
Nove države članice se lahko letno odločijo za uvedbo standardne sheme (SEP) in Komisija se je z nekaterimi zainteresiranimi novimi državami članicami glede tega vprašanja večkrat strokovno posvetovala.
It is however the responsibility of a Member State to judge advantages and disadvantages of such a decision. 
Vendar pa je presoja prednosti in slabosti takšne odločitve naloga posamezne države članice.
The structure of the farming community varies extensively across Member States as well as their administrative capacity. 
Struktura kmetijske skupnosti se med državami članicami močno razlikuje, prav tako njihova upravna usposobljenost.
Common reply to indent 1 and 2 Criteria such as ‘concrete and regular agricultural activity’ could link the level of support to the performance by the beneficiary of an actual production obligation which would not be compatible neither with the CAP targets for achieving greater market orientation through decoupled direct payments, nor with the WTO ‘green box’ conditions. 
Skupni odgovor na alinei 1 in 2 Merila, kot je „konkretna in redna kmetijska dejavnost“, bi lahko raven podpore povezala z izpolnjevanjem dejanske zaveze za proizvodnjo s strani upravičenca, ki ne bi bila združljiva s cilji SKP za doseganje večje tržne usmerjenosti z nevezanimi neposrednimi plačili niti s pogoji „zelene škatle“ STO.
In addition, diversification of activities is a valuable alternative to limited growth opportunities within the farm sector. 
Poleg tega je diverzifikacija dejavnosti glede na omejene priložnosti za rast v kmetijskem sektorju koristna alternativa.
Under the current legislation (Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009) any natural or legal person exercising an agricultural activity might receive direct payments. 
V skladu z veljavno zakonodajo (člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009) lahko vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, ki opravlja kmetijsko dejavnost, prejme neposredna plačila.
However, Member States have a possibility to restrict access to direct payment by applying Article 28(2) of that Regulation. 
Vendar imajo države članice možnost, da na podlagi člena 28(2) navedene Uredbe omejijo dostop do neposrednega plačila.
Besides, it has to be noted that it is Member States obligation to establishing minimum requirement for GAEC. 
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da so države članice zavezane k vzpostavitvi minimalnih zahtev za GAEC.
The issue is addressed in the Commission proposals for the CAP towards 2020 through the definition of an active farmer and agricultural activity.4 4 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy, Article 9 and Article 4 respectively. 
To vprašanje je obravnavano v predlogih Komisije o SKP do leta 2020 z opredelitvijo aktivnega kmeta in kmetijske dejavnosti4.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION XI. Reply on indent 3 The Commission’s legislative proposals aim at a more balanced distribution of aid through several measures such as progressive reduction and capping of direct payments, flexibility between pillars, regional allocation of national ceilings, convergence of the value of payment entitlements and small farmers scheme. 
Odgovor na alineo 3 Cilj zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije je bolj uravnoteženo razdeljevanje pomoči z več ukrepi, kot so postopno zmanjševanje in omejitev neposrednih plačil, prožnost med stebri, regionalna dodelitev nacionalnih zgornjih mej, konvergenca vrednosti pravic do plačila in shema za male kmete.
Under the new policy, all MS (including current SAPS countries) will have the option to regionalise the payments taking into account agronomic and economic characteristics and their regional agricultural potential. 
V skladu z novo politiko bodo imele vse države članice (vključno z državami, ki trenutno uporabljajo SEPP) možnost za regionalizacijo plačil ob upoštevanju agronomskih in gospodarskih značilnosti ter njihovega regionalnega kmetijskega potenciala.
Reply on indent 4 The issue has been analysed in a study on the functioning of land markets5, in the CAP Health Check — Impact Assessment6, and a further study on market factors is currently under way in the RTD 7th Framework Programme.7 By providing an effective income insurance and minimum stability of revenue SAPS support helps farmers to mitigate adverse effects of such structural factors. 
Odgovor na alineo 4 To vprašanje je bilo analizirano v študiji o delovanju zemljiških trgov5, v pregledu stanja SKP – ocena učinka6, trenutno pa v okviru 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj poteka dodatna študija o tržnih dejavnikih7. Podpora iz SEPP z zagotavljanjem učinkovitega zavarovanja dohodka in minimalne stabilnosti prihodkov kmetom pomaga ublažiti neugodne učinke takšnih strukturnih dejavnikov.
Reply on indent 5 It is the responsibility of the Member States to take a decision on implementation of the SPS and to request consultation from the Commission. 
Odgovor na alineo 5 Naloga držav članic je, da sprejmejo odločitev o izvajanju SEP in od Komisije zahtevajo posvetovanje.
The Commission has to respect the subsidiarity principle and cannot intervene in the Member States’ competences. 5 Study on the Functioning of Land Markets in the EU Member States under the Influence of Measures Applied under the common agricultural policy, Final report November 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/ analysis/external/landmarkets/index_en.htm 6 CAP HEALTH CHECK — IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOTE N° 1 http://ec.europa. eu/agriculture/healthcheck/ia_annex/c1_en.pdf 7 Comparative Analysis of Factor Markets for Agriculture across the Member States, http://cordis.europa.eu/search/index.cfm?fuseaction=proj. document&PJ_RCN=11351201. 
5 Study on the Functioning of Land Markets in the EU Member States under the Influence of Measures Applied under the Common Agricultural Policy (Študija o delovanju zemljiških trgov v državah članicah EU pod vplivom ukrepov, ki se izvajajo v okviru skupne kmetijske politike), končno poročilo, november 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/ landmarkets/index_en.htm. 6 CAP HEALTH CHECK – IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOTE N° 1 (Pregled stanja SKP – dokument o oceni učinka št. 1) http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/ healthcheck/ia_annex/c1_en.pdf; 7 Comparative Analysis of Factor Markets for Agriculture across the Member States (Primerjalna analiza trgov produkcijskih dejavnikov za kmetijstvo držav članic), http://cordis.europa.eu/search/index.cfm?fuseaction=proj. document&PJ_RCN=11351201.
The Factor Market project started on 1.9.2010 and will end on 31 August 2013. 
Projekt v zvezi s trgi produkcijskih dejavnikov se je začel 1. 9. 2010 in se bo končal 31.
42 INTRODUCTION 7. 
42 UVOD 7.
According to the Treaty of Accession, the SAPS was available for the new MS until the end of 2006 with the possibility of renewal twice by one year (till the end of 2008) at the new MS request. 
V skladu s pristopno pogodbo je bila SEPP novim državam članicam na voljo do konca leta 2006 z možnostjo dvakratne obnovitve za obdobje enega leta (do konca leta 2008) na zahtevo novih držav članic.
OBSERVATIONS 20. 
PRIPOMBE 20.
Only farmers within the definition laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (persons exercising an agricultural activity) qualify for the support. 
Do podpore so upravičeni le kmetje v okviru opredelitve, navedene v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št.
The definition reflects the decoupled nature of the scheme and the objective of promoting farmers’ market orientation while ensuring compliance with the WTO ‘green box’ conditions. 
Zadevna opredelitev odraža nevezani značaj sheme in cilj spodbujanja tržne usmerjenosti kmetov, obenem pa zagotavlja skladnost s pogoji „zelene škatle“ STO.
Production obligations or links to production factors may not be imposed as eligibility criteria. 
Zaveze za proizvodnjo ali povezave s proizvodnimi dejavniki se ne smejo uvesti kot merila za upravičenost.
Member States must assess whether the characteristics of the land use do not prevent agricultural use. 
Države članice morajo oceniti, ali značilnosti uporabe zemljišča ne preprečujejo kmetijske uporabe.
The mentioned examples of beneficiaries are considered according to current EU legislation (Article 2(a) of Regulation 73/2009) to be farmers as long as they exercise an agricultural activity. 
Pod navedene primere upravičencev se v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo EU (člen 2(a) Uredbe št. 73/2009) uvrščajo kmetje, ki izvajajo kmetijsko dejavnost.
These farmers are entitled to SAPS payment if the eligibility conditions are fulfilled. 
Ti kmetje so upravičeni do plačila iz SEPP, če so izpolnjeni pogoji za upravičenost.
Nevertheless, according to Article 28(2) of Regulation 73/2009 Member States have the option to exclude farmers marginally involved in farming from SAPS benefits. 
Vendar imajo države članice v skladu s členom 28(2) Uredbe št.
The definition of agricultural activity reflects the objective of promoting farmers’ market orientation while ensuring compliance with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) ‘green box’ rules. 
Opredelitev kmetijske dejavnosti odraža cilj spodbujanja tržne usmerjenosti kmetov, obenem pa zagotavlja skladnost s pravili „zelene škatle“ Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO).
The SAPS is decoupled from production and compliant with the WTO ‘green box’ rules, therefore production obligations or links to production factors may not be imposed as eligibility criteria. 
SEPP ni vezana na proizvodnjo in je skladna s pravili „zelene škatle“ STO, zato se zaveze za proizvodnjo ali povezave s proizvodnimi dejavniki ne smejo uvesti kot merila za upravičenost.
In this context farmers may decide to ‘maintain the land in GAEC’ instead of producing agricultural products. 
V tem okviru se kmetje lahko odločijo, da bodo namesto proizvajanja kmetijskih proizvodov „zemljišča obdelovali v skladu z GAEC“.
The main objective of decoupling is market orientation and in general, farmers, as entrepreneurs, are actively farming in order to generate an income from the selling of their products and possibly other activities. 
Glavni namen ločevanja pomoči od proizvodnje je tržna usmerjenost in na splošno kmetje, kot podjetniki, aktivno kmetujejo, da od prodaje svojih proizvodov in morda še drugih dejavnosti ustvarijo dohodek.
The decision not to produce is also a market-oriented behaviour if variable production costs are not covered. 
Odločitev proti proizvajanju je tudi tržno usmerjeno vedenje, če variabilni proizvodni stroški niso kriti.