natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission re-affirms that it has changed its procedures to allow for more frequent decision-taking in order to accelerate the process. 
Komisija ponavlja, da je spremenila svoje postopke, da bi omogočila hitrejše sprejemanje odločitev in tako pospešila proces.
This procedural change will have its effect but some time is needed before the positive impact of these changes become visible. 
Ta sprememba postopka bo imela pozitiven učinek, vendar bo ta postal opazen šele čez nekaj časa.
ANNEX 2.4 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS FOR REVENUE The Court maintains its position that the Commission should reduce the time taken between the recording of infringement cases in the single register of potential infringement and the referral of cases to the Court of Justice of the European Union. 
PRILOGA 2.4 NADALJNJE UKREPANJE PO PREJŠNJIH OPAŽANJIH ZA PRIHODKE Sodišče ponavlja, da bi morala Komisija skraj­ šati čas med vpisom primerov v enotni register možnih kršitev in predložitvijo zadev Sodišču Evropske unije.
Nevertheless out of a total of eight infringement procedures respectively mentioned within paragraphs 4.19 and 4.24 of the 2008 and 2007 Annual Reports, five cases have in the meantime been closed. 
Kljub temu je bilo medtem končanih pet od skupno osmih postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, omenjenih v odstavku 4.19 letnega poročila za leto 2008 in odstavku 4.24 letnega poročila za leto 2007.
EN 52 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 Court observation Action taken GNI-based own resource: EU revision policy (including the follow-up of the Greek revision) Court analysis Commission reply In its 2006 Annual Report the Court made observations on the revision to Greek GNI (paragraphs 4.24 to 4.26) and recommended in paragraph 4.32 that the Commission: (a) sets rules on communication and is forewarned, together with the GNI Committee, of major revisions, (a) Four Member States presented major (a) revisions in their 2009 GNP/GNI Question­ naires and Quality Reports. 
SL 52 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 Opažanja Sodišča Sprejeti ukrepi Analiza Sodišča Lastna sredstva iz BND: politika spreminjanja v EU (vključno z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem po grških spremembah) Odgovori Komisije Sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za proračunsko leto 2006 podalo opažanja o spremembah grškega BND (odstavki 4.24 do 4.26) in v odstavku 4.32 priporočilo, da Komisija: (a) določi pravila o sporočanju in je skupaj z odborom BND vnaprej obveščena o velikih spremembah; (a) Štiri države članice so v svojih vprašalnikih o BNP/BND in poročilih o kakovosti za leto 2009 prikazale velike spremembe.
Belgium and Estonia did not send any official letters to notify their major revision in National Accounts, although reminders were sent In none of the four cases guidelines on communications of major statistical revisions set up by the CMFB were applied. 
Belgija in Estonija nista poslali nobenega uradnega pisma z napovedjo svojih velikih sprememb nacionalnih računov, čeprav jima je Eurostat poslal opomin. Malta in Latvija sta uradni pismi z napovedjo poslali po izteku roka. (a) V nobenem od štirih primerov niso bile uporabljene smernice za sporočanje velikih sprememb statističnih podatkov, ki jih je določil odbor za monetarno, plačilno in plačilnobilančno statistiko.
Eurostat should take appropriate measures in order to ensure that such guidelines are followed by Member States. (a) The Commission (Eurostat) constantly reminds the Member States of the need to apply the guidelines, particularly during GNI Committee meetings and in bilateral contacts. 
Eurostat bi moral sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovil, da se države članice držijo takšnih smernic. (a) Komisija (Eurostat) stalno opozarja države članice, da je treba uporabljati smernice, zlasti na sestankih Odbora BND in med dvostranskimi stiki.
Although, for the cases of revisions completed in 2009 mentioned by the Court, some information was given in advance by the concerned Member States during GNI Committee meetings, the Commission will continue to monitor and to stress the importance of Member States' compliance with this procedure. (b) implements a coordinated policy for National Accounts data revisions, including the requirement for a regular bench-marking, and (b) In the CMFB (Committee on Monetary, (b) Financial and Balance of Payments Statistics) meeting of July 2009, the Commission and the European Central Bank made a proposal for a concrete Despite the progress made, further work is needed by the Commission and Member States in order to implement a common revision policy in the European Union. (b) The Commission is continuing work and discussions with the Member States in order to implement a common revision policy in the EU, taking into account the remarks of the Court. by Eurostat. 
Čeprav je zadevna država članica na sestankih Odbora BND vnaprej dala nekaj infor­ macij o spremembah, končanih leta 2009, ki jih je omenilo Sodišče, bo Komisija še naprej sprem­ ljala, ali države članice spoštujejo pravila tega postopka, in poudarjala pomembnost tega. (b) izvaja usklajeno politiko spreminjanja podatkov iz nacionalnih računov, vključno z zahtevo po rednem referenčnem primerjanju, ter (b) Na sestanku odbora za monetarno, plačilno in plačilnobilančno statistiko julija 2009 sta Komisija in Evropska centralna banka predlagali konkretno skupno politiko spre­ memb za nacionalne račune in plačilno bilanco. (b) Kljub doseženemu napredku morajo Komi­ (b) sija in države članice opraviti dodatno delo, da bodo lahko izvajale skupno politiko spreminjanja v Evropski uniji. Komisija ob upoštevanju pripomb Sodišča nada­ ljuje delo in razprave z državami članicami za izvajanje skupne politike spreminjanja v EU.
The members of the CMFB decided that Member States should carry out an assessment of the impact of the proposed EU revision policy on national statistical production processes. 
Člani odbora so se odločili, da bi morale države članice opraviti oceno učinka, ki bi ga predlagana politika spreminjanja na ravni EU imela na postopke nacionalne priprave statističnih podatkov.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 53 Court observation Action taken Court analysis Commission reply (c) The Commission (Eurostat) is continuing its (c) ensures that the conclusions from control of the Greek inventory are available early enough, so as to allow the inclusion of corrected data in accounts for the financial year 2007. (c) In July 2009, the Commission lifted six out of the seven Greek specific reservations. (c) The Commission (Eurostat) should continue its work in 2010, in cooperation with Greece, in order to complete the verification of the Greek GNP data for the period 1995-2001. cooperation with the Greek authorities in order to be able to lift the one remaining GNP reser­ vation for the period 1995-2001. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 53 Opažanja Sodišča (c) zagotovi, da so zaključki kontrole grškega opisa Sprejeti ukrepi Analiza Sodišča (c) Komisija (Eurostat) bi morala leta 2010 v Odgovori Komisije (c) Komisija (Eurostat) še naprej sodeluje z grškimi metodologije za BND na voljo dovolj zgodaj, da bo popravljene podatke mogoče vključiti v račune za proračunsko leto 2007. (c) Julija 2009 je Komisija umaknila šest od sedmih grških posebnih pridržkov. sodelovanju z Grčijo nadaljevati delo in končati preverjanje grških podatkov o BNP za obdobje 1995–2001. organi, da bi lahko odpravila preostali pridržek za BND za obdobje 1995–2001.
In its 2007, 2008, and 2009 Annual Reports the Court took note of the progress made by the Commission and of the additional work needed, in cooperation with Member States, to implement the above-mentioned recommendations. 
V svojih letnih poročilih za leta 2007, 2008 in 2009 je Sodišče omenilo napredek Komisije in dodatno delo, ki bi ga bilo treba izvesti v sodelovanju z državami članicami za izvajanje zgoraj omenjenih priporočil.
GNI-based own resource: measurement of illegal activities in National Accounts ESA95 (1), in its Articles 1.13(g) and 3.08, requires that illegal activities, which fulfil the characteristics of an economic transaction, should be included in the measure of GDP/GNI. 
Lastna sredstva iz BND: merjenje nezakonitih dejavnosti v nacionalnih računih Člena 1.13(g) in 3.08 ESR 95 (1) zahtevata, da so neza­ konite dejavnosti, ki imajo značilnosti ekonomske tran­ sakcije, zajete v merjenje BDP/BND.
The GNI Committee discussed the measurement of illegal activities in National Accounts in March 2004. 
Odbor BND je marca 2004 razpravljal o merjenju nezakonitih dejavnosti v nacionalnih računih.
Because of the serious difficulties encountered in defining guidelines in this area, the GNI Committee recommended not to introduce explicit adjustments to cover illegal activities until better compilation methods and sources are available. 
Zaradi resnih težav pri opredeljevanju smernic na tem področju je priporočil, naj se ne uvedejo eksplicitne prilagoditve, ki bi pokrivale nezakonite dejavnosti, dokler ne bodo na voljo boljši metode in viri za sestavljanje.
Despite the progress made on the measurement of illegal activities in National Accounts, further work is needed by the Commission and Member States. 
Kljub napredku pri merjenju nezakonitih dejav­ nosti v nacionalnih računih morajo Komisija in države članice vanj vložiti še dela.
The GNI Committee discussed, at its meeting on 29 April 2010, issues related to the last category of illegal activities it had identified for national accounts purposes. 
Odbor BND je na sestanku 29. aprila 2010 razpra­ vljal o zadevah, povezanih z zadnjo kategorijo neza­ konitih dejavnosti, ki jo je opredelil v zvezi z nacio­ nalnimi računi.
Further to this discussion, the Commission will propose solutions on the issue of the measurement of illegal activities in national accounts in the first half of 2011. 
V skladu s tem bo Komisija v prvi polovici leta 2011 predlagala rešitve za vprašanje merjenja nezakonitih dejavnosti v nacionalnih računih.
In its 2004 Annual Report (paragraph 3.54(c)), the Court recommended that the Commission ensure that all Member States comply with ESA95 requirements in respect of illegal activities. 
Sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za proračunsko leto 2004 (odstavek 3.54(c)) priporočilo, naj Komisija zago­ tovi, da vse države članice spoštujejo zahteve iz ESR 95 v zvezi z nezakonitimi dejavnostmi.
In April 2008 and April 2009, the GNI Committee examined measurement issues relating to certain categories of illegal activities on the basis of the results of recent studies carried out by some Member States. 
Aprila 2008 in aprila 2009 je odbor BND na podlagi rezultatov nedavnih študij, ki so jih izvedle nekatere države članice, preučil zadeve v zvezi z merjenjem, ki se nanašajo na določene kategorije nezakonitih dejavnosti.
The Commission (Eurostat) planned to conclude its review of the state of play concerning estimates of illegal activities in National Accounts and to propose guidelines for Member States in 2010, taking into account the opinions expressed by the GNI Committee. 
Komisija (Eurostat) je leta 2010 nameravala končati svoj pregled stanja pri ocenah nezako­ nitih dejavnosti v nacionalnih računih in pred­ lagati smernice za države članice, pri tem pa upoštevati mnenja odbora BND.
EN 54 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 Court observation Action taken Court analysis Commission reply GNI-based own resource: Financial intermediation services indirectly measured (FISIM) Financial intermediation services indirectly measured (FISIM) represent a part of the production of financial institutions which is not delivered under the form of direct sale of services with a fixed price, but by means of charging a higher rate of interest for loans than the one used for deposits. In their September/October 2008 transmission The Court will follow up in its future audits the of ESA95 data, all Member States made allocation of FISIM in the GNI used for the The allocation of FISIM within ESA95 was defined by Council Regulation (EC) No 448/98 (2), and was imple­ mented from 1 January 2005 onwards by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1889/2002 (3). 
SL 54 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 Opažanja Sodišča Sprejeti ukrepi Lastna sredstva iz BND: posredno merjene storitve finančnega posredništva (PMSFP) Analiza Sodišča Odgovori Komisije Posredno merjene storitve finančnega posredništva (PMSFP) so del storitev finančnih institucij, ki se ne zago­ tavljajo v obliki neposredne prodaje storitev s fiksno ceno, temveč z uporabo obrestne mere, ki je višja za posojila kot za depozite. Vse države članice so pri pošiljanju podatkov v skladu z ESR 95 septembra/oktobra 2008 dale na voljo podatke iz nacionalnih računov z razporeditvijo PMSFP (s čimer se je BND držav članic povprečno povečal za več kot 1 %). Sodišče bo v svojih prihodnjih revizijah sprem­ ljalo razporejanje PMSFP v BND, ki se uporablja za izračun lastnih sredstev.
By way of dero­ gation, Article 8(1) of the first Regulation provides that the decision to allocate FISIM for the purposes of the Communities’s budget and its own resources shall be adopted by the Council, acting unanimously, on a proposal from the Commission. 
Kot odstopanje člen 8(1) prve uredbe določa, da Svet na predlog Komisije soglasno sprejme odločitev, da se PMSFP razporedijo za namene proračuna Skupnosti in lastnih sredstev.
In May 2009, the Commission made a proposal for a Council decision, with retroactive effect as from 1 January 2005, on the allocation of FISIM for the establishment of GNI used for the purposes of own resources. 
Komisija je maja 2009 izdala predlog za sklep Sveta o razporejanju PMSFP za določitev BND, ki se uporablja za lastna sredstva, z retroaktivno veljavnostjo od 1. januarja 2005.
In its 2005 Annual Report (paragraph 4.30(e)), the Court recommended that the Commission presents a proposal for FISIM to be included in the GNI used for the calcu­ lation of own resources. 
Sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za proračunsko leto 2005 (odstavek 4.30(e)) priporočilo, naj Komisija pred­ stavi predlog za vključitev PMSFP v BND, ki se uporablja za izračun lastnih sredstev.
The Council Working Party on Own Resources discussed this Commission proposal and raised concerns about the methodology of calculation of the FISIM, and timing of the entry into force and retroactivity of the proposal. 
Delovna skupina Sveta za lastna sredstva je razpravljala o tem predlogu Komisije in izrazila zaskrbljenost glede metodologije za izračuna­ vanje PMSFP, času nastopa veljavnosti in retroa­ ktivnosti predloga.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 (OJ L 310, 30.11.1996, p. 
2223/96 (UL L 310, 30.11.1996, str.
1), as amended. 
1), kakor je bila spremenjena.
(2) OJ L 58, 27.2.1998, p. 
(2) UL L 58, 27.2.1998, str.
(3) OJ L 286, 24.10.2002, p. 
(3) UL L 286, 24.10.2002, str.
(4) OJ L 87, 7.4.2010, p. 
(4) UL L 87, 7.4.2010, str.
In October 2009, a revised presidency proposal was made, proposing that the Council decision take effect on 1 January 2010. 
Oktobra 2009 je bil pripravljen spremenjen predlog predsedstva, ki je kot datum začetka veljavnosti sklepa Sveta predlagal 1. januar 2010.
In March 2010 Council Decision 2010/196/EU, Euratom(4) was adopted. 
Marca 2010 je bil sprejet Sklep Sveta 2010/196/EU, Euratom (4).
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 55 CHAPTER 3 Agriculture and Natural Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3.1-3.17 Specific characteristics of the policy group Audit scope and approach Regularity of transactions Agriculture and rural development Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, and Health and Consumer Protection Effectiveness of systems Policy area agriculture and rural development Systems related to regularity of transactions Systems related to recoveries and financial corrections Policy areas Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Health and Consumer Protection Reliability of Commission management representations Conclusions and recommendations Paragraph 3.3-3.16 3.17 3.18-3.26 3.20-3.23 3.24-3.26 3.27-3.64 3.27-3.61 3.27-3.49 3.50-3.61 3.62-3.64 3.65-3.69 3.70-3.77 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 55 POGLAVJE 3 Kmetijstvo in naravni viri KAZALO Uvod Posebne značilnosti skupine politik Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Pravilnost transakcij Kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja Okolje, pomorske zadeve in ribištvo ter zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov Uspešnost sistemov Področje politik kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja Sistemi, povezani s pravilnostjo transakcij Sistemi, povezani z izterjavami in finančnimi korekcijami Področje politik okolje, pomorske zadeve in ribištvo ter zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov Zanesljivost poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije Zaključki in priporočila Odstavek 3.1–3.17 3.3–3.16 3.17 3.18–3.26 3.20–3.23 3.24–3.26 3.27–3.64 3.27–3.61 3.27–3.49 3.50–3.61 3.62–3.64 3.65–3.69 3.70–3.77
EN 56 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S INTRODUCTION 3.1. This chapter presents the Court’s specific assessment of Agriculture and Natural Resources, which comprises policy areas 05-Agriculture and rural development, 07-Environment, 11-Maritime Affairs and Fisheries and 17-Health and Consumer Protection. 
SL 56 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A UVOD 3.1 Topoglavjepredstavljaposebnoocenokmetijstvain naravnih virov, ki jo pripravi Sodišče in ki obsega področja politik 05 – kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, 07 – okolje, 11 – pomorske zadeve in ribištvo ter 17 – zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov.
Key information on the activities covered and the spending in 2009 is provided in Table 3.1. 
Ključne informacije o zajetih dejavnostih in porabi v letu 2009 so navedene v tabeli 3.1.
Table 3.1 — Agriculture and Natural Resources — Key information Budget (million euro) Policy area Description Payments 2009 Agriculture and rural development Administrative expenditure Interventions in agricultural markets Direct aids Rural development Pre-accession measures Other 128 7 006 39 114 8 738 254 – 31 55 209 Environment Administrative expenditure Operational expenditure 87 269 356 Fisheries and Maritime affairs Administrative expenditure Operational expenditure 39 553 592 Health and consumer protection Administrative expenditure Operational expenditure 111 416 526 Title Management Mode Centralised direct Shared Shared Shared Decentralised Shared 5 7 Centralised direct Centralised direct/Centralised indirect Centralised direct Centralised/Shared Centralised direct Centralised direct/Centralised indirect 11 17 Total administrative expenditure (1) Total operational expenditure (consisting of): – advances – interim/final payments Total payments for the year Total commitments for the year 366 56 318 518 55 800 56 684 62 165 (1) The audit of administrative expenditure is reported in Chapter 9. Source: Annual Accounts 2009. 
Tabela 3.1 – Kmetijstvo in naravni viri – ključne informacije Področje politike Opis Plačila za leto 2009 Kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja upravni odhodki intervencije na kmetijskih trgih neposredne pomoči razvoj podeželja predpristopni ukrepi drugo 128 7 006 39 114 8 738 254 – 31 55 209 Okolje upravni odhodki operativni odhodki 87 269 356 Ribištvo in pomorske zadeve upravni odhodki operativni odhodki 39 553 592 Zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov upravni odhodki operativni odhodki 111 416 526 Prora­ čunski naslov (v milijonih EUR) Način upravljanja neposredno centralizirano deljeno deljeno deljeno decentralizirano deljeno neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano / posredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano centralizirano / deljeno neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano / posredno centralizirano 5 7 11 17 Upravni odhodki skupaj (1) Operativni odhodki skupaj (ki jih sestavljajo): – predplačila – vmesna/končna plačila Plačila za leto skupaj Obveznosti za leto skupaj 366 56 318 518 55 800 56 684 62 165 (1) Revizija upravnih odhodkov je predstavljena v poglavju 9. Vir: Letni računovodski izkazi za leto 2009.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 57 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.2. Under the Treaty, the Commission has overall respon­ sibility for implementing the EU budget. For agricultural and rural development virtually all expenditure is carried out under shared management whereby implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 57 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A 3.2 Komisija je po Pogodbi v celoti odgovorna za izvrše­ vanje proračuna EU. Praktično vsi odhodki za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja se izvršujejo v okviru deljenega upravljanja, pri čemer so naloge, povezane z izvrševanjem, prenesene na države članice.
For the other areas, budgetary appropriations are spent under the direct and indirect management of the Commission with the exception of the European Fisheries Fund which is under shared management on the basis of multi-annual programmes. 
Proračunske odobritve za ostala področja se porabijo v okviru neposrednega in posrednega upravljanja Komisije, z izjemo Evropskega sklada za ribištvo, za katerega se uporablja deljeno upravljanje na osnovi večletnih programov.
Specific characteristics of the policy group Policy area agriculture and rural development 3.3. The objectives (1) of the common agricultural policy as set out in the Treaty are to increase agricultural productivity, thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, to stabilise markets, to assure the availability of supplies and to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices. 
Posebne značilnosti skupine politik Področje politik kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja 3.3 Cilji (1) skupne kmetijske politike, določeni v Pogodbi, so povečanje kmetijske produktivnosti za zagotavljanje primerne življenjske ravni za kmetijsko skupnost, stabilizacijo trgov, zagotavljanje redne preskrbe in preskrbe, ki je potroš­ nikom dostopna po primernih cenah.
3.4. The EU budget finances the common agricultural policy expenditure mainly through two Funds(2): the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (hereinafter ‘EAGF’), which fully finances EU direct aid and market measures (3) as explained hereunder, and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (hereinafter ‘EAFRD’), which co-finances at varying rates rural development programmes. _____________ (1) Article 39 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union. 
3.4 Skupna kmetijska politika se iz proračuna EU financira predvsem iz dveh skladov (2): Evropskega kmetijskega jamstve­ nega sklada (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EKJS), ki v celoti financira neposredno pomoč EU in tržne ukrepe (3), kot je pojasnjeno v nadaljevanju, ter Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EKSRP), ki po različnih stop­ njah sofinancira programe za razvoj podeželja. _____________ (1) Člen 39 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
(2) Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 
1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financi­ ranju skupne kmetijske politike (UL L 209, 11.8.2005, str. 1).
(3) With the exception of certain measures such as promotion measures and the school fruit scheme which are co-financed. 
(3) Razen nekaterih ukrepov, kot so promocijski ukrepi in shema za razdeljevanje sadja v šolah, ki so sofinancirani.
EN 58 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.5. ThemainmeasuresfinancedbyEAGFare: — The direct aid scheme ‘Single Payment Scheme’ (SPS) which was introduced in order to decouple the payments made to farmers from production (‘decoupling’). 
SL 58 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.5 Glavniukrepi,kisefinancirajoizEKJS,so: — Shema neposredne pomoči, ki se imenuje „shema enotnega plačila“ (SEP) in ki je bila uvedena za ukinitev vezanosti plačil kmetom od proizvodnje („ukinitev vezanosti“).
To qualify under the SPS farmers must first obtain ‘entitlements’ (4) each of which, together with one hectare of eligible land declared by the farmer, gives rise to an SPS payment at least until 2013 (5). 
Za upravičenost do pomoči iz SEP morajo kmetje najprej pridobiti „pravice“ (4), od katerih vsaka z enim hektarom upravičene zemlje, ki jo je kmet prijavil, prinese plačilo v okviru SEP vsaj do leta 2013 (5).