natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
92 However, this analysis, while valuable, cannot be regarded as a review of the suitability of Directive 2011/85 concerning requirements on MTBFs, for the following reasons: o the MTBF index used in this analysis is based on the Fiscal Governance Database (see paragraph 04), which is mainly fed with information provided by national authorities, rather than information from an autonomous assessment by the Commission of the functioning of the NBFs; o the criteria used for scoring the index and Directive 2011/85 requirements are only partially overlapping (see paragraph 91); o an improvement in the MTBF index may just reflect the enactment of a budgetary reform, even if it is not yet operational, i.e. the index may just capture the conformity of its design rather than its actual functioning (see Box 4); 
Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče 92 Te analize pa kljub njeni dragocenosti ni mogoče šteti za pregled ustreznosti Direktive 2011/85, kar zadeva zahteve za srednjeročne proračunske okvire, ker: o indeks kakovosti srednjeročnega proračunskega okvira, uporabljen v tej analizi, temelji na zbirki podatkov o fiskalnem upravljanju (glej odstavek 04), v kateri se zbirajo predvsem informacije, ki jih prispevajo nacionalni organi, ne pa informacije iz neodvisnih ocen Komisije o delovanju nacionalnih proračunskih okvirov, o se merila, ki se uporabljajo za točkovanje v indeksu, in zahteve Direktive 2011/85 le deloma prekrivajo (glej odstavek 91), o izboljšanje indeksa kakovosti srednjeročnega proračunskega okvira morda odraža le sprejetje proračunske reforme, tudi če se ta še ne izvaja, kar pomeni, da je v indeksu morda zajeta le skladnost njene zasnove, ne pa njeno dejansko delovanje (glej okvir 4),
o the MTBF index spans the period 2006‐2015. However, 2015 predates the start of the EU ‘pilot procedures’, meaning that the index could not possibly reflect the Commission’s assessment of either the transposition or application of Directive 2011/85; o the MTBF index shows an improvement (increase in the score) for euro‐area Member States either in 2011 or earlier years with the exception of France, Germany, Finland (slight increases in 2012, 2013 and 2015 respectively) and Luxembourg (2014). 
o indeks kakovosti srednjeročnega proračunskega okvira zajema obdobje 2006– 2015, pilotni postopki EU pa so se začeli šele po letu 2015, kar pomeni, da indeks ne more odražati ocene, ki jo je Komisija pripravila o prenosu in uporabi Direktive 2011/85, o indeks kakovosti srednjeročnega proračunskega okvira za države članice euroobmočja kaže izboljšanje (povišanje točk) leta 2011 ali prej, razen v Franciji, Nemčiji, na Finskem (rahla povišanja v letih 2012, 2013 oziroma 2015) in v Luksemburgu (2014), vendar za izboljšanja leta 2011 ali prej ni mogoče trditi, da odražajo učinek Direktive 2011/85, saj je ta začela veljati šele 13. decembra 2011.
Member States under a financial assistance programme (Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Spain and Portugal) also saw improvements, as did a Member State in the process of joining the euro (Lithuania). However, the Commission’s analysis, while recognising the role played by financial assistance programmes, does not disentangle the impact of Directive 2011/85 from the impact of the obligations under the financial assistance programme or of the Member State’s drive to join the euro area. 
Izboljšanja so bila ugotovljena tudi v državah članicah, vključenih v programe finančne pomoči (Ciper, Grčija, Irska, Latvija, Španija in Portugalska), in v državi članici v postopku pridružitve euroobmočju (Litva), vendar Komisija v svoji analizi, v kateri sicer priznava vlogo programov finančne pomoči, učinka Direktive 2011/85 ne ločuje od učinka obveznosti v okviru programov finančne pomoči ali prizadevanj države članice za pridružitev euroobmočju.
39 Box 4 – Examples of an increasing score of the MBTF index linked to the enactment and not the actual functioning of budgetary reforms We found that the Commission had upgraded the MTBF index of some of the Member States in our sample (Italy, Latvia and Luxembourg) immediately after they had enacted budgetary reforms (in 2009, 2013 and 2014 respectively), even though the application of these reforms (and hence their effect) was gradual and was not completed by 2015. 
39 Okvir 4 – Primeri povišanja točk indeksa kakovosti srednjeročnega proračunskega okvira, povezanega s sprejetjem, ne pa z dejanskim delovanjem proračunskih reform Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je Komisija indeks kakovosti srednjeročnega proračunskega okvira nekaterih držav članic v vzorcu (Italije, Latvije in Luksemburga) povišala takoj po tem, ko so sprejele proračunske reforme (leta 2009, 2013 oziroma 2014), čeprav je bilo izvajanje teh reform (in s tem tudi njihov učinek) postopno in dokončano šele leta 2015.
In the case of Italy, a new accounting law was passed in 2009, but several secondary legislative acts were needed and were approved over time. 
Italija je leta 2009 sprejela nov zakon o računovodstvu, vendar je bilo potrebnih več sekundarnih zakonodajnih aktov, ki so bili sprejeti kasneje.
The implementation process is still ongoing (according to reports from the Ministry of Finance). 
Postopek izvajanja še poteka (glede na poročila ministrstva za finance).
In the case of Luxembourg and Latvia, in the course of the EU ‘pilot procedures’, the Commission identified gaps between the enacted reform and the requirements of Directive 2011/85. 
V Luksemburgu in Latviji je Komisija med pilotnimi postopki EU opazila vrzeli med sprejeto reformo in zahtevami Direktive 2011/85, zaradi česar je pri zaključitvi pilotnih postopkov prišlo do zamude.
National authorities had to fill those gaps through legislative or administrative amendments, which took place – and hence took effect – only after the cut‐off date for the econometric analysis. 
Nacionalni organi so morali vrzeli odpraviti z zakonodajnimi ali upravnimi spremembami, vendar so bile te sprejete in so začele veljati šele po presečnem datumu za ekonometrično analizo.
Assessment of the Fiscal Compact 93 The TSCG requires the Commission to present “in due time” a report assessing the compliance with the Fiscal Compact of the national provisions adopted by Member States (see paragraph 06). 
Ocena fiskalnega dogovora 93 V PSUU je določeno, da mora Komisija pravočasno predstaviti poročilo o oceni skladnosti nacionalnih določb, ki jih sprejmejo države članice, s fiskalnim dogovorom (glej odstavek 06).
Based on information provided by the Member States, the Commission issued its report on 22 February 201759. 
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih zagotovile države članice, je Komisija poročilo izdala 22. februarja 201759.
In line with its mandate, the Commission's assessment focuses on the legal compliance of the national provisions. It did not receive any mandate to assess the effective application of the new national rules transposing the Fiscal Compact. 94 The main conclusions that can be drawn from the report are that: o all Member States have put in place a binding balanced budget rule, although only some at a constitutional level; o Member States differ in their definition of exceptional circumstances allowing a temporary deviation from their MTO; o Member States differ in the extent to which the correction mechanism is automatic and in the scope of the required corrective action; o legal provisions were adopted in all Member States to set up IFIs although the Commission had some concerns regarding the independence safeguards of some of them; o many Member States had not yet integrated the ‘comply‐or‐explain’ principle into their legal framework (i.e. a government has to justify when it does not comply with the assessments of the IFI), but they committed to apply it appropriately. 
V skladu s pooblastili se je Komisija v oceni osredotočila na zakonsko skladnost nacionalnih določb, ni pa prejela pooblastil za oceno uspešne uporabe novih nacionalnih pravil za prenos fiskalnega dogovora. 94 Iz poročila je mogoče sklepati predvsem, da: o so vse države članice sprejele zavezujoče pravilo o uravnoteženem proračunu, čeprav so ga nekatere sprejele le na ustavni ravni, o države članice uporabljajo različne opredelitve izjemnih okoliščin, v katerih se dopušča začasni odklon od srednjeročnega proračunskega cilja, o se to, kdaj popravljalni mehanizem deluje samodejno, in obseg zahtevanih popravljalnih ukrepov po državah članicah razlikujeta, o so vse države članice sprejele pravne predpise za vzpostavitev neodvisnih fiskalnih institucij, čeprav je imela Komisija v zvezi z nekaterimi od njih pomisleke glede varoval za neodvisnost, o številne države članice v svoj pravni okvir še niso vključile načela „upoštevaj ali pojasni” (kar pomeni, da mora vlada, kadar ne upošteva ocen neodvisne fiskalne institucije, to pojasniti), vendar so se zavezale, da ga bodo ustrezno uporabljale.
95 The Commission’s overall assessment was positive, even though the transposition of the Fiscal Compact was slow and incomplete. 
95 Splošna ocena, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, je bila pozitivna, čeprav je bil prenos fiskalnega dogovora počasen in nepopoln.
As pointed out by the ECB60, however, commitments are “not an adequate substitute for legal provisions, as they 59 European Commission (2017), C(2017) 1201 final, ‘Report from the Commission presented under Article 8 of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union’. 
473/2013 96 Komisija je v okviru pregleda ekonomskega upravljanja, ki je pokrival akte zakonodajnega šestorčka in dvojčka, novembra 2014 opravila prvo oceno uporabe 59 Evropska komisija (2017), C(2017) 1201 final, Report from the Commission presented under Article 8 of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union.
60 ECB (2017), ‘Economic Bulletin 4’, Box 8: The fiscal compact: the Commission’s review and the way forward. 40 
60 Evropska centralna banka (2017), Ekonomski bilten, številka 4, okvir 8: The fiscal compact: the Commission’s review and the way forward. 40
However, the assessment was inconclusive, as it came too soon after the entry into force of Regulation 473/2013. 
473/2013. Ocena ni bila dokončna, ker je bila pripravljena prekmalu potem, ko je uredba začela veljati.
The next assessment is due by the end of 2019. 
Naslednja ocena je predvidena za konec leta 2019.
97 The Commission also monitors developments of national legislation on NBFs and their application through the European Semester61, albeit to a limited extent: it assesses whether the Member States’ budget positions are approaching their MTOs (see paragraph 46), but does not evaluate in detail the functioning of the underlying NBFs. 
97 Komisija spremembe v nacionalni zakonodaji v zvezi z nacionalnimi proračunskimi okviri in njihovo uporabo spremlja tudi z evropskim semestrom61, vendar v omejenem obsegu: ocenjuje, ali se proračunska stanja držav članic približujejo njihovim srednjeročnim proračunskim ciljem (glej odstavek 46), ne pa tudi podrobnosti v zvezi z delovanjem nacionalnih proračunskih okvirov.
Figure 7 provides further details on the various steps. 
Več podrobnosti o različnih korakih je prikazanih na sliki 7.
Conclusions and recommendations 98 We looked at whether the Commission’s actions to strengthen the budgetary frameworks of the EU Member States achieved the results intended. 
Zaključki in priporočila 98 Sodišče je preverilo, ali so ukrepi Komisije za okrepitev proračunskih okvirov držav članic EU dosegli načrtovane rezultate.
We conclude that by proposing Directive 2011/85 and Regulation 437/2013, which have been adopted, and the 2017 draft Directive, for which the legislative process is still ongoing, the Commission contributed to fostering improvements in national budgetary frameworks (paragraph 17). 
Prišlo je do zaključka, da je Komisija s predlaganjem Direktive 2011/85 in Uredbe št. 437/2013, ki sta bili sprejeti, ter osnutka direktive iz leta 2017, za katero zakonodajni postopek še poteka, prispevala k prizadevanjem za izboljšanje nacionalnih proračunskih okvirov (odstavek 17).
99 However, the Commission has not clarified how it will minimise possible divergences between the independent fiscal institutions’ and the Commission’s assessments of compliance with EU fiscal rules in cases where both the Commission and national independent fiscal institutions assess the compliance with EU fiscal rules. 
99 Komisija pa ni pojasnila, kako bo kar najbolj zmanjšala morebitna odstopanja med ocenami neodvisnih fiskalnih institucij in svojimi ocenami glede skladnosti s fiskalnimi pravili EU v primerih, v katerih skladnost s fiskalnimi pravili EU ocenjuje tako sama kot tudi nacionalne neodvisne fiskalne institucije.
100 There have been instances where the Commission and an independent fiscal institution have come to different conclusions. 
100 V nekaterih primerih so Komisija in neodvisne fiskalne institucije prišle do različnih zaključkov.
One reason for this is that, in assessing compliance, the Commission makes full use of the discretion granted to it by EU law, and its power to interpret this discretion. 
Eden od razlogov za to je, da Komisija pri ocenjevanju skladnosti v celoti uporablja diskrecijsko pravico, ki jo ima na podlagi prava EU, in svoje pooblastilo za razlago te pravice.
This applies particularly to the “exceptional circumstances” accepted as justification for softening the adjustment requirements for Member States that have not yet reached their medium-term budgetary objectives (paragraphs 45 to 55). 
To velja predvsem za izjemne okoliščine, ki se sprejemajo kot utemeljitev za omilitev zahtev za prilagoditev držav članic, ki še niso dosegle srednjeročnih proračunskih ciljev (odstavki 45 do 55).
Recommendation 1 – Compliance assessments by the Commission and the independent fiscal institutions To ensure that independent fiscal institutions can fulfil their role effectively, and in order to minimise divergence between the independent fiscal institutions’ and the Commission’s assessments of compliance with EU fiscal rules, the Commission should strengthen cooperation with the independent fiscal institutions. 
Priporočilo 1 – Ocene Komisije in neodvisnih fiskalnih institucij glede skladnosti Da se neodvisnim fiskalnim institucijam omogoči uspešno izvajanje nalog in da se kar najbolj zmanjšajo odstopanja med ocenami neodvisnih fiskalnih institucij in Komisije glede skladnosti s fiskalnimi pravili EU, naj Komisija okrepi sodelovanje z neodvisnimi fiskalnimi institucijami.
Timeframe: 2020 onwards. 
Časovni okvir: od leta 2020 naprej.
101 A number of requirements in the EU legal framework concerning medium-term budgetary frameworks and independent fiscal institutions fall short of the international standards and best practice set by the IMF and the OECD, and often despite the views expressed in economic papers published by the Commission itself. 
101 Več zahtev v pravnem okviru EU glede srednjeročnih proračunskih okvirov in neodvisnih fiskalnih institucij ne izpolnjuje mednarodnih standardov in najboljše prakse MDS in OECD, pogosto kljub stališčem, izraženim v ekonomskih dokumentih, ki jih je objavila Komisija sama.
The 2017 draft Directive, if approved, would only partially correct those weaknesses (paragraphs 18 to 41). 42 
Če bo osnutek direktive iz leta 2017 sprejet, bo te slabosti odpravil le deloma (odstavki 18 do 41). 42
Recommendation 2 – Review requirements for national budgetary frameworks To further strengthen budgetary frameworks, the Commission should review the requirements for medium-term budgetary frameworks and independent fiscal institutions, also taking into account international standards and best practice, and propose actions as appropriate to improve their scope and effectiveness. 
Priporočilo 2 – Pregled zahtev v zvezi z nacionalnimi proračunskimi okviri Za dodatno okrepitev proračunskih okvirov naj Komisija pregleda zahteve za srednjeročne proračunske okvire in neodvisne fiskalne institucije, pri čemer naj upošteva tudi mednarodne standarde in najboljšo prakso, ter predlaga ustrezne ukrepe za izboljšanje njihovega obsega in uspešnosti.
The Commission should base this on the observations made in this report, as well as on the results of its suitability review and its assessment of the compliance and application of Directive 2011/85 and Regulation 473/2013. 
To naj stori na podlagi opažanj iz tega poročila, pa tudi rezultatov svojega pregleda ustreznosti ter svoje ocene skladnosti in uporabe Direktive 2011/85 in Uredbe št. 473/2013.
Timeframe: within one year of the publication of the Commission’s assessment of the Six-and Two-Packs (which include Directive 2011/85 and Regulation 473/2013). 
Časovni okvir: v enem letu po objavi ocene Komisije v zvezi z zakonodajnim šestorčkom in dvojčkom (ki vključujeta Direktivo 2011/85 in Uredbo št. 473/2013).
102 The effectiveness of the European Fiscal Board is limited by its current institutional set-up. 
102 Uspešnost Evropskega fiskalnega odbora je omejena zaradi njegove sedanje institucionalne ureditve.
Moreover, the ‘comply-or-explain’ principle does not apply to the Commission (paragraphs 56 to 68). 
Poleg tega se načelo „upoštevaj ali pojasni” ne uporablja za Komisijo (odstavki 56 do 68).
Recommendation 3 – Strengthen the European Fiscal Board To further strengthen enforcement of the EU fiscal rules and independent assessment of the Commission’s work with respect to the national dimension, the Commission should: (a) review the mandate as well as the institutional set-up of the European Fiscal Board and publish Commission’s conclusions, including justifications in case no changes will be proposed; (b) apply the “comply-or-explain” principle whereby the Commission should publicly justify instances when it does not comply with assessments of the European Fiscal Board. 
Priporočilo 3 – Okrepitev Evropskega fiskalnega odbora Za dodatno okrepitev izvrševanja fiskalnih pravil EU in neodvisne ocene dela Komisije v zvezi z nacionalno razsežnostjo naj Komisija: (a) pregleda pooblastila in institucionalno ureditev Evropskega fiskalnega odbora ter objavi svoje zaključke, vključno z utemeljitvijo, če ne bo predlagala nobenih sprememb; (b) uporablja načelo „upoštevaj ali pojasni”, v skladu s katerim bi morala v primerih, ko ne ravna skladno z ocenami Evropskega fiskalnega odbora, to javno pojasniti.
103 The Commission has not yet completed its assessment of the compliance of national legislation with the requirements of Directive 2011/85, which included transposition and conformity checks (paragraphs 72 to 80). 
103 Komisija še ni dokončala svoje ocene skladnosti nacionalne zakonodaje z zahtevami Direktive 2011/85, vključno s preverjanjem prenosa in skladnosti (odstavki 72 do 80).
104 The Commission’s assessments on the application of the EU legal framework (Directive 2011/85 and Regulation 473/2013) have either not yet been carried out or came at too early a stage of implementation to be meaningful (paragraphs 84 to 92 and 96). 
104 Ocen uporabe pravnega okvira EU (Direktive 2011/85 in Uredbe št.
105 The Commission’s current monitoring of the developments on national budgetary frameworks is, amongst other things, based on the Fiscal Governance Database. 
105 Spremljanje razvoja nacionalnih proračunskih okvirov Komisija trenutno izvaja med drugim na podlagi zbirke podatkov o fiskalnem upravljanju, v kateri se zbirajo informacije, ki jih zagotovijo države članice, namesto na dejansko delovanje pa so osredotočene predvsem na institucionalno ureditev (odstavek 92).
Recommendation 4 – Strengthen enforcement of national budgetary frameworks To assess whether the objectives set in the legal acts (Directive 2011/85 and Regulation 473/2013) were achieved, and considering that eight to six years have passed since their adoption, the Commission should: (a) finalise without further delay the compliance assessment; (b) carry out and publish as soon as possible a comprehensive suitability review of Directive 2011/85; (c) revise the Fiscal Governance Database questionnaires or identify another suitable tool to request on a regular basis comprehensive information on the actual functioning of the national budgetary frameworks; (d) on a regular basis, monitor the functioning of the national budgetary frameworks, through a structured methodology focusing on the operational performance of key elements of the national budgetary frameworks. 
Priporočilo 4 – Okrepitev izvrševanja nacionalnih proračunskih okvirov Za oceno tega, ali so bili cilji iz pravnih aktov (Direktive 2011/85 in Uredbe št. 473/2013) doseženi, in ob upoštevanju tega, da je od njunega sprejetja minilo šest oziroma osem let, naj Komisija: (a) brez dodatnih zamud dokonča oceno skladnosti; (b) čim prej izvede in objavi celovit pregled ustreznosti Direktive 2011/85; (c) spremeni vprašalnike za zbirko podatkov o fiskalnem upravljanju ali opredeli drugo ustrezno orodje, in sicer tako, da se bodo redno zbirale celovite informacije o dejanskem delovanju nacionalnih proračunskih okvirov; (d) redno spremlja delovanje nacionalnih proračunskih okvirov s strukturirano metodologijo, osredotočeno na operativno uspešnost ključnih elementov nacionalnih proračunskih okvirov.
The Commission should follow up any significant weakness identified. 
Komisija naj obravnava vsako ugotovljeno bistveno slabost.
Timeframe for (a): by mid-2020, (b): by end-2019, (c): by end-2020, and (d): 2021 onwards. 44 
Časovni okvir za (a): do srede leta 2020, (b): do konca leta 2019, (c): do konca leta 2020, (d): od leta 2021 naprej.
This Report was adopted by Chamber IV, headed by Mr Brenninkmeijer, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg on 15 October 2019. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat IV, ki ga vodi Alex Brenninkmeijer, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 15. oktobra 2019.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner Lehne President 45 
Za Evropsko računsko sodišče Klaus-Heiner Lehne 44 Predsednik
30 November 2014 Economic governance review: Report on the application of the Six-Pack and the Two-Pack 21 October 2015 Communication: “On steps towards completing EMU” 14 December 2018 Deadline for the suitabilityreview of Directive 2011/85 (not published) 14 December 2019 Deadline for the 2nd report on the application of Regulation 473/2013 including the review of the suitability of Directive 2011/85 
473/2013 vključno s pregledom ustreznosti Direktive 2011/85 1. januar 2013 Začetek veljavnosti PSUU 31. maj 2013 Začetek veljavnosti zakonodajnega dvojčka 24. junij 2015 Poročilo petih predsednikov: Dokončanjeevropske ekonomske in monetarne unije 21. oktober 2015 Sporočilo o korakih za dokončanje ekonomske in monetarne unije 30. november 2014 Pregled ekonomskega upravljanja: poročilo o uporabi zakonodajnega šestorčka in dvojčka 19. oktober 2016 Komisija imenuječlane Evropskega fiskalnegaodbora 1. marec 2017 Bela knjiga o prihodnostiEvrope 31. maj 2017 Razmislek o poglobitvi ekonomske in monetarne unije 22. februar 2017 Poročilo v skladu sčlenom 8 PSUU v EMU 14. december 2018 Rok za pregled ustreznosti Direktive 2011/85 (ni objavljen)
Annex II – Commission’s view on the medium-term budgetary framework (i) A single process for preparing MTBF and annual budget, and fully integrated documentation. 
Priloga II – Mnenje Komisije o srednjeročnem proračunskem okviru (i) Enoten proces za pripravo srednjeročnega proračunskega okvira in letnega proračuna ter v celoti povezana dokumentacija.
01 The Commission had acknowledged already in 2011 the problem that “while Stability and Convergence Programmes (SCPs) are already presented from a multiannual perspective, these policy documents have remained of limited policy relevance in the domestic debate surrounding the discussion of budgetary strategies, despite the fact that Member States are supposed to draft their budget in accordance with their SCP commitments”62. 
01 Komisija je že leta 2011 priznala problem, da so programi za stabilnost in konvergenco sicer že predstavljeni z večletnega vidika, vendar da je za politiko relevantnost teh dokumentov o politiki v nacionalni razpravi o proračunskih strategijah omejena, čeprav bi morale države članice svoje proračune pripraviti v skladu s svojimi zavezami v okviru teh programov62.