natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We also noted that the Polish and Romanian national authorities had set eligibility conditions designed to obtain greater synergies with the relevant broader strategies like the Sustainable Energy Action Plans or Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da so poljski in romunski nacionalni organi določili pogoje upravičenosti tako, da bi dobili večje sinergije z ustreznimi širšimi strategijami, kot so akcijski načrti za trajnostno energijo ali načrti za trajnostno mobilnost v mestih.
73 In 2014-2020 up to 64 % of climate-related expenditure under the ERDF and CF operational programmes is expected from the investment categories for which the 100 % EU climate coefficient is applied. 
73 V obdobju 2014–2020 se 64 % odhodkov za podnebne cilje v okviru operativnih programov ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada pričakuje iz kategorij naložb, za katere se uporablja 100-odstotni podnebni koeficient.
This means that they make a significant contribution towards climate change objectives (see Table 2). 
To pomeni, da bistveno prispevajo k ciljem na področju podnebnih sprememb (glej tabelo 2).
This is an increase compared with 2007-2013, when most of the climate-related expenditure came from activities with only a moderate contribution to climate change (see Figure 12). 
To je več kot v obdobju 2007–2013, ko je bila večina odhodkov za podnebne cilje za dejavnosti, ki samo zmerno prispevajo k ciljem na področju podnebnih sprememb (glej sliko 12).
Observations 44 Share and amounts of climate action expenditure according to the EU climate coefficients in the two periods 0 % 2014-2020 MFF 2007-2013 MFF 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 % 55 billion euro 33 billion euro 35 billion euro (64 %) 20 billion euro (36 %) 12 billion euro (36 %) 21 billion euro (64 %) 100 % coefficient 40 % coefficient Source: European Court of Auditors’ estimates based on Commission data. 
Opažanja 44 Deleži in zneski odhodkov za podnebne ukrepe glede na podnebne koeficiente EU v obeh obdobjih 0 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 % 55 milijard EUR 33 milijard EUR 35 milijard EUR (64 %) 20 milijard EUR (36 %) 12 milijard EUR (36 %) 21 milijard EUR (64 %) Večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2014–2020 Večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 100-odstotni koeficient 40-odstotni koeficient Vir: ocene Evropskega računskega sodišča na podlagi podatkov Komisije.
74 48 These projects are considered as 40 % climate related. 
74 48 Ti projekti se štejejo kot 40-odstotno povezani s podnebnimi spremembami.
Although in 2014-2020, the funding of measures deemed primarily directed at climate action is set to increase in each of the three Member States visited, the extent of this increase differs significantly. 
Čeprav naj bi se v obdobju 2014–2020 financiranje ukrepov, ki štejejo za usmerjene predvsem v podnebne cilje, v vseh treh obiskanih državah povečalo, se obseg povečanja bistveno razlikuje.
In Poland and Romania, mainly due to the continued support of railways and urban transport48, around half of the climate-related funding across all operational programmes is assigned a 100 % coefficient, while in German operational programmes nearly all of the climate-related expenditure is weighted at 100 % due to its significant contribution to climate action. 
Na Poljskem in v Romuniji se predvsem zaradi stalne podpore železnicam in mestnemu prometu48 s 100-odstotnim koeficientom ponderira približno polovica financiranja za podnebne cilje v vseh operativnih programih, v nemških operativnih programih pa se 100-odstotni ponder uporablja za skoraj vse odhodke za podnebne cilje, saj ti bistveno prispevajo k podnebnim ukrepom.
75 However, the role of climate action in research and innovation and in the field of small-and medium-sized enterprises was found to be relatively small. 
75 Izkazalo se je, da je vloga podnebnih ukrepov na področju raziskav in inovacij ter malih in srednjih podjetij razmeroma majhna.
In the audited programmes in Germany and Romania, we found that the Commission had not pushed strongly during programming negotiations significantly to increase the amount of climate action taken in the research and development nor business development fields in programmes where this amount was either low or non-existent. 
Sodišče je iz revidiranih programov v Nemčiji in Romuniji ugotovilo, da si Komisija med pogajanji o načrtovanju programov ni dovolj prizadevala za bistveno povečanje zneska za podnebne ukrepe na področju raziskav in razvoja ter poslovnega razvoja v programih, v katerih je bil ta znesek nizek ali pa ga sploh ni bilo.
Member States were able to hit the 20 % target without having to adapt funding in these areas. 
Države članice so lahko izpolnile cilj 20 %, ne da bi morale na teh področjih prilagoditi financiranje.
This means that not all the potential opportunities for financing climate-related action were fully utilised. 
To pomeni, da vse potencialne možnosti za financiranje ukrepov v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami niso bile v celoti izkoriščene.
Observations 45 The European Social Fund’s potential contribution to climate action — more could be achieved 76 The Commission has acknowledged an increasing demand for green jobs, with the energy efficiency sector expected to employ 2 million by 2020, and the renewable energy sector 3 million49. 
Opažanja 45 Mogoči prispevki Evropskega socialnega sklada k podnebnim ukrepom: doseči bi bilo mogoče več 76 Komisija priznava, da je povpraševanje po zelenih delovnih mestih vse večje, tako naj bi sektor energetske učinkovitosti do leta 2020 zaposloval 2 milijona ljudi, sektor obnovljivih virov energije pa 3 milijone49.
Matching the supply of ‘green workers’ to the increased demand will prove crucial to the establishment of a green economy. 
Usklajevanje ponudbe „zelenih delavcev” s povečanim povpraševanjem bo ključno za vzpostavitev zelenega gospodarstva.
A lack of qualified specialists and workers in the green jobs sector would trigger costs and delays50 in the implementation of climate-related actions. 
Pomanjkanje kvalificiranih strokovnjakov in delavcev v sektorju zelenih delovnih mest bi povzročilo stroške in zamude50 pri izvajanju ukrepov v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami.
77 At the same time, the transition to a low-carbon economy will also lead to job cuts in the fossil fuel-based sectors, leaving workers from these sectors with a need to acquire new skills51. 
77 Hkrati bo prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo povzročil tudi ukinjanje delovnih mest v sektorjih, ki temeljijo na fosilnih gorivih, zato se bodo morali delavci iz teh sektorjev priučiti novih veščin51.
Compared to the other cohesion policy funds, the ESF operational programmes explicitly allocated a very low share to climate action, specifically 1.4 % of 83 billion euros. 
Operativni programi ESS so v primerjavi z drugimi skladi kohezijske politike za podnebne ukrepe izrecno namenili zelo majhen delež, konkretno 1,4 % od 83 milijard EUR.
78 The Commission considered that the share of the ESF allocated to climate-related expenditure established on the basis of the information reported by the Member States in the ESF operational programmes may underestimate the expected contribution of the ESF to climate action in the 2014-2020 period, the final extent of which will only be known after the programmes’ implementation. 
78 Komisija je menila, da je bil z deležem sredstev ESS, namenjenim odhodkom za podnebne cilje in določenim na podlagi informacij držav članic v operativnih programih ESS, morda podcenjen pričakovan prispevek ESS za podnebne ukrepe v obdobju 2014–2010, katerega obseg bo znan šele po izvedbi programov.
Not having set appropriate requirements for the ESF to take climate action into account represents a missed opportunity for this area to contribute more to the shift to a low-carbon economy and to climate action in general. 
Ker ni bilo ustreznih zahtev, naj ESS upošteva podnebne ukrepe, je bila zamujena priložnost za to, da bi to področje več prispevalo k prehodu na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo in k podnebnim ukrepom na splošno.
79 When the 2014-2020 operational programmes were under approval, there was no requirement for Member States to provide the Commission with any justification of the ESF allocation to climate action objectives. 
79 Ko so bili operativni programi za obdobje 2014–2020 v postopku odobritve, Komisija od držav članic ni zahtevala, naj ji predložijo obrazložitev dodeljevanja sredstev ESS za cilje na področju podnebnih ukrepov.
Therefore, the programmes were not systematically checked to see whether they would target the demand for green jobs or support the transition to a low-carbon economy. 
Zato se ni sistematično preverjalo, ali so programi usmerjeni v povpraševanje po zelenih delovnih mestih in ali podpirajo prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo.
49 See the Commission Staff Working Document ‘Exploiting the employment potential of green growth’ of 18 April 2012. 
49 Glej delovni dokument služb Komisije z naslovom Exploiting the employment potential of green growth (Izkoriščanje zaposlitvenega potenciala zelene rasti), 18. april 2012.
50 The UK House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee report ‘Green Jobs and Skills’ concludes that ‘relying exclusively on the market to address skills gaps is causing delays in greening the economy.’ http://www. publications.parliament.uk/ pa/cm200910/cmselect/ cmenvaud/159/159i.pdf 51 See e.g. paragraphs 324 and 325 of the OECD report ‘Aligning Policies for the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy’ http://www.oecd. org/env/Aligning-policies-for-the-transition-to-a-low- carbon-economy-CMIN2015-11.pdf 
50 V poročilu odbora britanskega spodnjega doma za okoljski pregled Green Jobs and Skills (Zelena delovna mesta in veščine) je navedeno, da do zamud pri ekologizaciji gospodarstva prihaja, ker se pri odpravljanju vrzeli v veščinah zanašamo izključno na trg. http://www. publications.parliament.uk/ pa/cm200 910/cmselect/ cmenvaud/159/159i.pdf 51 Glej na primer odstavka 324 in 325 poročila OECD z naslovom Aligning Policies for the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy (Usklajevanje politik za prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo) http://www. oecd.org/env/Aligning-policies-for-the-transition-to- a-low-carbon-economy-CMIN2015-11.pdf
Observations 46 No significant change in the common agricultural policy spending, although good practices exist in rural development 80 This section assesses whether the incorporation of climate action into the agricultural direct payments and the rural development programmes under review has resulted in positive changes in the quantity of climate spending — measured by an increased volume of funds for climate-related spending — and in its quality — measured by its better focus on climate-related operations. 
Opažanja 46 Pri porabi skupne kmetijske politike ni nobenih večjih sprememb, čeprav na področju razvoja podeželja obstajajo dobre prakse 80 V tem razdelku je ocenjeno, ali je vključitev podnebnih ukrepov v pregledana neposredna kmetijska plačila in programe razvoja podeželja prinesla pozitivne spremembe v količini porabe za podnebne cilje – merjeno z večjo količino finančnih sredstev, namenjenih porabi za podnebne cilje – in njeni kakovosti – merjeno z večjo usmerjenostjo porabe v dejavnosti za podnebne cilje.
We reviewed available evidence upon the cross-compliance system and agricultural direct payments and also the 2014-2020 rural development programmes for Andalusia, Poland and the Rhône-Alpes and compared them to the 2007-2013 programmes. 
Sodišče je pregledalo razpoložljive dokaze o sistemu navzkrižne skladnosti in neposrednih kmetijskih plačilih ter programe za razvoj podeželja Andaluzije, Poljske in regije Rona-Alpe za obdobje 2014–2020 ter jih primerjalo s programi za obdobje 2007–2013.
Introduction of a Green Payment does not guarantee a significant change of the contribution of direct payments to climate 81 In a recent report52, we concluded that the changes to the common agricultural policy for the period 2014-2020 reduced the number of the cross-compliance rules, by removing requirements which were not sufficiently relevant to the farming activity. 
Uvedba plačila za zeleno komponento ne zagotavlja bistvene spremembe v prispevku neposrednih plačil k podnebnim ciljem 81 Sodišče je v nedavnem poročilu52 ugotovilo, da se je s spremembami skupne kmetijske politike za obdobje 2014–2020 zmanjšalo število pravil o navzkrižni skladnosti, saj so bile odpravljene zahteve, ki niso bile dovolj relevantne za kmetijsko dejavnost.
82 The greening component was introduced as a new feature of the common agricultural policy for the period 2014-2020. 
82 Zelena komponenta je bila v obdobju 2014–2020 uvedena kot nov element skupne kmetijske politike.
Although it includes requirements relevant to climate (see paragraph 53), it is largely based on the previous good agricultural and environmental conditions, which covered similar agricultural practices, such as protection of permanent pastures or retention of landscape features. 
Čeprav vsebuje zahteve, ki zadevajo podnebje (glej odstavek 53), v glavnem temelji na preteklih dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih, ki so zajemali podobne kmetijske prakse, kot sta zaščita trajnih pašnikov ali ohranjanje značilnosti pokrajine.
Available information shows that 64 % of beneficiaries of direct payments are exempted from greening requirements53. 
Razpoložljive informacije kažejo, da je 64 % upravičencev do neposrednih plačil izvzetih iz zahtev zelene komponente53.
As a result, there is a risk that reorientation of direct payments towards climate action will be limited. 
Zato obstaja tveganje, da bo preusmeritev neposrednih plačil v podnebne ukrepe omejena.
The Commission plans to evaluate the environmental achievements of the green payment in 2017 and at the end of 2018. 
Komisija namerava okoljske dosežke plačil za zeleno komponento oceniti v letu 2017 in ob koncu leta 2018.
83 The multiannual financial framework 2014-2020 contribution to agricultural direct payments is expected to amount to 288 billion euros. 
83 Prispevek iz večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2014–2020 za neposredna kmetijska plačila naj bi po predvidevanjih znašal 288 milijard EUR.
This amount is comparable to the amount of 276 billion euros of direct aid paid to producers in the financial years 2007 to 201354. 
Ta znesek je primerljiv z zneskom 276 milijard EUR neposredne pomoči, ki je bil pridelovalcem izplačan v proračunskih letih 2007–201354.
52 Special Report No 26/2016 ‘Making cross-compliance more effective and achieving simplification remains challenging’ (http://eca. europa.eu). 
52 Posebno poročilo št. 26/2016 – Doseganje uspešnejše navzkrižne skladnosti in poenostavitve ostaja izziv (http://eca.europa.eu).
53 Commission Staff Working Document of 22.6.2016 ‘Review of greening after one year’ — SWD(2016) 218 final, see p. 
53 Delovni dokument služb Komisije z dne 22. junija 2016 z naslovom Review of greening after one year (Pregled zelene komponente po enem letu) – SWD(2016) 218 final, glej str.
14 of Annex 2, part 3/6. 
14 Priloge 2, del 3/6.
54 This amount has been estimated by adding the indicative figures on direct aid payments to producers according to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003) (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 
54 Znesek je bil ocenjen tako, da smo sešteli okvirne zneske za neposredna plačila pridelovalcem v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 (UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str.
1) and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 
1) in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 (UL L 30, 31.1.2009, str.
16) provided in the reports on the distribution of direct aid to farmers for the financial years 2007 to 2013: http://ec.europa.eu/ agriculture/cap-funding/ beneficiaries/direct-aid/ index_en.htm 
16), ki so navedeni v poročilih o razdeljevanju neposredne pomoči kmetovalcem v proračunskih letih od leta 2007 do leta 2013: http://ec.europa.eu/ agriculture/cap-funding/ beneficiaries/direct-aid/ index_en.htm
Observations 47 Climate funding in rural development: no increase in the focus on climate action 84 Due to the specificities of rural development, a comparison across all rural development programmes was not possible because programme measures are implemented through different types of operation from one programme to the next. 
Opažanja 47 Financiranje za podnebne cilje v okviru razvoja podeželja: usmerjenost v podnebne ukrepe se ni povečala 84 Vseh programov razvoja podeželja zaradi posebnosti tega področja ni bilo mogoče primerjati med seboj, ker se programski ukrepi v različnih programih izvajajo z različnimi vrstami dejavnosti.
Based on three rural development programmes, we estimated the share of climate funding in 2007-2013 and compared it against the plans for 2014-2020. 
Na podlagi treh programov za razvoj podeželja je Sodišče ocenilo delež financiranja za podnebne cilje v obdobju 2007–2013 in ga primerjalo z načrti za obdobje 2014–2020.
Across these programmes, we saw no real upward or downward shift in investments (see Table 4). 
Sodišče pri nobenem od teh programov ni zaznalo konkretne rasti niti upadanja naložb (glej tabelo 4).
Climate funding in 2007-2013 and in 2014-2020 Rural development programmes reviewed Estimated share of climate funding in 2007-2013 Estimated amount of climate funding in 2007-2013 (billion euro) Share of climate funding in 2014-2020 Amount of climate funding in 2014-2020 (billion euro) Andalusia, Spain 66.2 % 1.38 55.0 % 1.05 Poland (one rural development programme for the whole of the Member State) 37.0 % 0.50 39.4 % 0.34 Rhône-Alpes, France 78.0 % 0.51 75.0 % 0.80 Source: European Court of Auditors’ estimates based on programming documents. 
Financiranje za podnebne cilje v obdobjih 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 Pregledani programi razvoja podeželja Ocenjeni delež financiranja za podnebne cilje 2007–2013 Ocenjeni znesek financiranja za podnebne cilje 2007–2013 (v milijardah EUR) Delež financiranja za podnebne cilje 2014–2020 Znesek financiranja za podnebne cilje 2014–2020 (v milijardah EUR) Andaluzija, Španija 66,2 % 1,38 55,0 % 1,05 Poljska (en program razvoja podeželja za celotno državo članico) 37,0 % 0,50 39,4 % 0,34 Rona-Alpe, Francija 78,0 % 0,51 75,0 % 0,80 Vir: ocene Evropskega računskega sodišča na podlagi programskih dokumentov Komisije.
Observations 48 Good practices exist in rural development but generally business as usual prevails 85 When assessing the programmes for any qualitative improvements, we found so far no significant change in the key features of the management process, such as the requirements or eligibility and selection criteria. 
Opažanja 48 Dobre prakse na področju razvoja podeželja sicer obstajajo, a na splošno se ni skoraj nič spremenilo 85 Sodišče pri oceni kvalitativnih izboljšav programov doslej ni ugotovilo bistvenih sprememb v ključnih elementih upravljavskega procesa, kot so zahteve ali merila za upravičenost in izbor.
This was particularly true of financially significant measures, such as measures dealing with areas under natural constraints or organic farming. 
To zlasti velja za finančno pomembne ukrepe, kot so ukrepi za obravnavo območij z naravnimi omejitvami ali ekološkim kmetovanjem.
86 The design of some less material measures had, however, been modified to make them more climate-related. 
86 Spremenila pa se je zasnova nekaterih manj pomembnih ukrepov, ki so postali bolj povezani s podnebnimi cilji.
We estimated that around 10 % of the EAFRD climate funding in the Rhône-Alpes, 22 % in Poland and 36 % in Andalusia are related to measures which better target climate action compared to 2007-2013. 
Sodišče je ocenilo, da je v regiji Rona-Alpe približno 10 % finančnih sredstev za podnebne cilje iz EKSRP povezanih z ukrepi, ki so bolje usmerjeni v podnebne ukrepe, kot so bili v obdobju 2007–2013, na Poljskem je takšnih 22 %, v Andaluziji pa 36 %.
We found several examples of emerging good practice contributing directly to tackling climate change (see Box 8). 
Ugotovilo je več primerov novih dobrih praks, ki neposredno prispevajo k boju proti podnebnim spremembam (glej okvir 8).
Examples of better targeting climate change in the audited EAFRD programmes The design of certain forestry measures we came across in Poland, the Rhône-Alpes and Andalusia had been improved to support carbon storage, or to boost the resistance of forests to climate change. 
Primeri boljše usmerjenosti v podnebne spremembe v revidiranih programih EKSRP Zasnova nekaterih gozdarskih ukrepov, ki jih je Sodišče obravnavalo na Poljskem, v regiji Rona-Alpe in Andaluziji, je bila izboljšana, tako da ti ukrepi zdaj podpirajo shranjevanje ogljika ali krepijo odpornost gozdov na podnebne spremembe.
The Rhône-Alpes programmes also included one measure helping to develop locally generated renewable energy by supporting investments from small forest-based companies in wood fuel. 
Programi regije Rona-Alpe so vključevali tudi ukrep, ki prispeva k razvoju lokalno proizvedene energije iz obnovljivih virov, saj podpira naložbe majhnih gozdnih podjetij v lesno gorivo.
We also found improvements in the three programmes’ design of climate-friendly agri-environment-climate measures. 
Sodišče je v vseh treh programih ugotovilo tudi izboljšanje v zasnovi podnebju prijaznih kmetijsko-okoljsko-podnebnih ukrepov.
Poland has started chemically analysing the organic carbon content of soil, and intercropping in order to achieve a positive balance of organic matter on an agricultural plot. 
Poljska je začela kemično analizirati vsebnost organskega ogljika v tleh in pridelovati vmesne kulture, da bi dosegla pozitivno stanje organske snovi na kmetijskih zemljiščih.
In Andalusia, new requirements have been introduced to tackle the issue of soil erosion which blights olive production. 
V Andaluziji so uvedli nove zahteve za obravnavo težav z erozijo tal, ki ogroža pridelavo oljk.
Observations 49 87 We also found examples of good practice in measures created in 2007-2013 which are still being implemented in 2014-2020 (see Box 9). 
Opažanja 49 87 Sodišče je primere dobre prakse našlo tudi v ukrepih, oblikovanih v obdobju 2007–2013, ki se še vedno izvajajo v obdobju 2014–2020 (glej okvir 9).
Example of continuation in climate funding from the Rhône-Alpes regional programme in France The 2014-2020 programme continues to support investment projects which contribute directly to mitigating climate change, for example through developing methane-production methods for agriculture. 
Primer nadaljevanja financiranja za podnebne cilje iz programa regije Rona-Alpe v Franciji Program za obdobje 2014–2020 še naprej podpira naložbene projekte, ki neposredno prispevajo k blažitvi podnebnih sprememb, na primer z razvojem metod proizvodnje metana za kmetijstvo.
The objective is to facilitate the supply and use of renewable energy sources. 
Cilj je olajšati oskrbo z energijo iz obnovljivih virov in njeno uporabo.
Justifiably, the projects are tracked with a 100 % climate coefficient. 
Projekti se upravičeno spremljajo s 100-odstotnim podnebnim koeficientom.
The project pictured below, funded in 2012 and completed in 2015, is an example of such a project, producing energy from waste. 
Projekt na spodnji sliki, ki je bil financiran leta 2012 in dokončan leta 2015, je primer takšnega projekta za proizvodnjo energije iz odpadkov.
Half of the waste input into the facility is of agricultural origin, while the other half is locally sourced green waste provided by a local company. 
Polovica vhodnih odpadkov za ta obrat je kmetijskega izvora, druga polovica pa so lokalno pridobljeni zeleni odpadki, ki jih zagotavlja lokalno podjetje.
The outputs improve the food self-sufficiency of the farm, and also meet the heating needs of a local school and other local premises. 
Z izložki se izboljša samooskr-ba kmetije s hrano in zadovoljijo se potrebe lokalne šole in drugih lokalnih objektov po ogrevanju.
The total EAFRD eligible cost for the methane-production facility was 881 000 euros. 
Skupni upravičeni stroški EKSRP za obrat za proizvodnjo metana so znašali 881 000 EUR.
The project was 37.36 % funded through public support, with 105 000 euros provided in EAFRD grants and 224 415 euros of national co-financing. 
Delež javne finančne pomoči projektu je znašal 37,36 %, od tega je bilo 105 000 EUR nepovratnih sredstev EKSRP in 224 415 EUR državnega sofinanciranja.