natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 4(1) and 4(2) of Regulation (EU) No 560/2014 specify that industry and research members should make total contributions of at least 2 730 million euro over the life span of the Joint Undertaking, out of which at least 1 755 million euro should consists of costs incurred by them in implementing additional activities outside the work plan of the Joint Undertaking. 
Člen 4(1) in 4(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 560/2014 določa, da morajo člani Industrijskega združenja in Raziskovalnega združenja med obdobjem delovanja Skupnega podjetja prispevati skupaj najmanj 2 730 milijonov EUR, od katerih naj bi bilo vsaj 1 755 milijonov EUR porabljenih za stroške, ki so jih imeli z izvajanjem dodatnih dejavnosti, ki ne spadajo v delovni program Skupnega podjetja.
In addition, Article 12(4) of the Joint Undertaking’s Statutes annexed to the same regulation states that out of the total amount industry members have to make financial (cash) contributions to the operational costs of the Joint Undertaking of at least 182,5 million euro. 
Poleg tega člen 12(4) statuta Skupnega podjetja v prilogi te uredbe določa, da morajo člani konzorcija za operativne stroške Skupnega podjetja zagotoviti vsaj 182,5 milijona EUR finančnih (denarnih) prispevkov.
In accordance with article 4 (4) of Regulation (EU) No 560/2014 the cost of additional activities are certified by an independent external auditor appointed by the Joint Undertaking. 
560/2014 mora stroške za dodatne dejavnosti potrditi neodvisni zunanji revizor, ki ga imenuje Skupno podjetje.
The cost for such activities shall however, not be audited by the Joint Undertaking or any Union body. 
Stroškov za dodatne dejavnosti ne revidira Skupno podjetje niti noben organ Unije.
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CH4101359EN04-18PP-CH114-18APCFIN-RAS-2017_BBI-OR.docx 2.10.2018 
12 12 13 14 15 16 17 CH4101359SL04-18PP-CH114-18APCFIN-RAS-2017_BBI-TR.docx 2.10.2018
The results of the evaluation were taken into account in the report that the Commission sent to the European Parliament and Council in October 201718. 
Rezultati ocene so bili upoštevani v poročilu, ki ga je Komisija poslala Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu oktobra 201718.
In response to the recommendations raised by the evaluators19, the Joint Undertaking prepared an Action Plan that was endorsed by the BBI Governing Board in March 201820. 
V odziv na priporočila, ki so jih izrekli ocenjevalci,19 je Skupno podjetje pripravilo akcijski načrt, ki ga je novembra 2018 potrdil upravni odbor BBI20.
While broadly accepting the recommendations, the Joint Undertaking has already launched the implementation of a certain number of actions21 aiming to address the main issues raised in the Interim Evaluation. 
Skupno podjetje je v glavnem sprejelo priporočila in je že začelo izvajati nekaj ukrepov21 zaradi reševanja glavnih vprašanj iz vmesne ocene.
According to the action plan, most of the actions to be taken in response to the recommendations should be implemented in 2018 and 2019. 
V skladu z akcijskim načrtom je treba večino ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti na podlagi priporočil, izvesti leta 2018 in 2019.
12 CH4101359EN04-18PP-CH114-18APCFIN-RAS-2017_BBI-OR.docx 2.10.2018 
13 CH4101359SL04-18PP-CH114-18APCFIN-RAS-2017_BBI-TR.docx 2.10.2018
This Report was adopted by Chamber IV, headed by Mr Neven MATES, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 2 October 2018. 
To poročilo je sprejel senat IV, ki ga vodi Neven MATES, član Evropskega računskega sodišča, v Luxembourgu na zasedanju 2. oktobra 2018.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President 13 CH4101359EN04-18PP-CH114-18APCFIN-RAS-2017_BBI-OR.docx 2.10.2018 
Za Evropsko računsko sodišče Klaus-Heiner LEHNE Predsednik 14 CH4101359SL04-18PP-CH114-18APCFIN-RAS-2017_BBI-TR.docx 2.10.2018
Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking THE JU’S REPLY With reference to the specific paragraph numbers of the Court’s observations: 27. 
Skupno podjetje za industrijske panoge, ki temeljijo na rabi biomase ODGOVOR SKUPNEGA PODJETJA S sklicevanjem na posamične odstavke v opažanjih Sodišča: 27.
The issue relating to financial contributions being provided only at programme level is well known since the beginning of the initiative due to the concern expressed by the industry partners (with respect to making financial contributions at programme level to be distributed in open calls for proposals). 
Problematika v zvezi s finančnimi prispevki, ki se zagotavljajo le na programski ravni, je dobro poznana že od začetka pobude, ko so industrijski partnerji izrazili svoje pomisleke (glede dodeljevanja finančnih prispevkov na programski ravni v javnih razpisih za zbiranje predlogov).
To address this the BBI JU’s Governing Board set up a task force in May 2016 which involved members of BIC, the European Commission and the BBI JU Programme Office. 
Zato je upravni odbor Skupnega podjetja BBI leta 2016 ustanovil delovno skupino, v kateri so sodelovali člani BIC, Evropska komisija in programski urad Skupnega podjetja BBI.
As a result, the European Commission initiated an amendment of the BBI ́s founding regulation to allow the private partners to provide financial contributions also at project level. 
Posledično je Evropska komisija sprožila spremembo ustanovne uredbe Skupnega podjetja BBI, ki zasebnim partnerjem omogoča, da zagotovijo finančne prispevke tudi na ravni projekta.
However, as the amendment entered into force only in February 2018, after the closure of four out of the seven calls for proposals planned until 2020 (inclusive), the risk of not achieving the minimum amount of financial (in-cash) contributions by the end of the BBI programme persists. 
Ker pa je sprememba začela veljati šele februarja 2018, po zaključku štirih od sedmih razpisov za zbiranje predlogov, ki so bili načrtovani do (vključno) leta 2020, obstaja tveganje, da do konca programa BBI ne bo dosežen najmanjši znesek finančnih (denarnih) prispevkov.
Therefore in 2018 the Governing Board of BBI JU renewed the financial task force mandate to propose different scenarios to achieve the highest amount feasible. 
Zato je leta 2018 upravni odbor Skupnega podjetja BBI podaljšal mandat finančne delovne skupine za oblikovanje predlogov različnih scenarijev za doseganje najvišjega možnega zneska.
BBI JU clarifies that the possibility to rank eligible proposals and co-finance them within the limits of a common budget line is in conformity with Horizon 2020 rules and extensively applied across the framework programme. 
Skupno podjetje BBI pojasnjuje, da je možnost, da se ocenijo upravičeni predlogi in jih sofinancira v mejah skupne proračunske postavke, skladna z določili programa Obzorje 2020 in se v veliki meri uporablja v okvirnem programu.
BBI JU takes note of the recommendation expressed by the Court to consider limiting the number of proposals per topic by defining an indicative budget at topic level in the calls for proposals. 
Skupno podjetje BBI se strinja s priporočilom Sodišča, naj razmisli o omejitvi števila predlogov s posamezno temo tako, da bi v razpisu za zbiranje predlogov določilo okvirni proračun na ravni tem.
BBI JU will continue to consider such a possibility in the design of future calls for proposals that shall ensure the optimal implementation of the Strategic Research Agenda of the BBI initiative. 
Skupno podjetje BBI si bo prizadevalo to možnost upoštevati pri oblikovanju prihodnjih razpisov za zbiranje predlogov, ki bodo zagotovili najbolj optimalno izvajanje strateškega raziskovalnega programa pobude BBI.
BBI JU EN 
BBI JU SL
TheOfficeoftheBodyofEuropeanRegulatorsforElectronic Communications (hereinafter “the Office”), which is located in Riga, was established by Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council1. 
UradOrganaevropskihregulatorjevzaelektronskekomunikacije(v nadaljnjem besedilu: Urad) s sedežem v Rigi je bil ustanovljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 1211/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta1.
The Office’s main task is to provide professional and administrative support services to the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and, under the guidance of the Board of Regulators, to collect and analyse information on electronic communications and to disseminate among National Regulatory Authorities regulatory best practices such as common approaches, methodologies or guidelines on the implementation of the EU regulatory framework2. INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE 2. 
Glavna naloga Urada je, da zagotavlja strokovno in administrativno podporo Organu evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije (BEREC) in pod vodstvom odbora regulatorjev zbira in analizira informacije o elektronskih komunikacijah ter širi najboljše regulativne prakse, kot so skupni pristopi, metodologije ali smernice za izvajanje regulativnega okvira EU, med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi.2 INFORMACIJE V PODPORO IZJAVI O ZANESLJIVOSTI 2.
TheauditapproachtakenbytheCourtcomprisesanalyticalaudit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an assessment of key controls of the Office’s supervisory and control systems. 
RevizijskipristopSodiščavključujeanalitičnerevizijskepostopke, neposredno preizkušanje transakcij in oceno ključnih kontrol nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov Urada.
This is supplemented by evidence provided by the work of other auditors (where relevant) and an analysis of management representations. 
Dopolnjujejo jih dokazi, pridobljeni z delom drugih revizorjev (kadar je smiselno) in analizo poslovodskih predstavitev.
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited: 1 2 OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p. 
Sodišče je v skladu z določbami člena 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) revidiralo: (a) zaključni račun Urada, ki ga sestavljajo računovodski izkazi3 in poročila o izvrševanju proračuna4 za proračunsko leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2013, ter 1 2 3 4 UL L 337, 18.12.2009, str.
Annex II summarises the Office’s competences and activities. 
V Prilogi II, ki je predstavljena v informativne namene, so povzete pristojnosti in dejavnosti Urada.
ADB001938EN04-14PP-CH069-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_BEREC-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
ADB001938SL04-14PP-CH069-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_BEREC-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
Articles 39 and 50 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 (OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 
1271/2013 (UL L 328, 7.12.2013, str.
The accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer are derived from the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) issued by the International Federation of Accountants or, where relevant, the International Accounting Standards (IAS)/International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. 
Računovodska pravila, ki jih je sprejel računovodja Komisije, so izpeljana iz mednarodnih računovodskih standardov za javni sektor (MRSJS), ki jih je izdala Mednarodna zveza računovodskih strokovnjakov, ali, kadar je smiselno, iz mednarodnih računovodskih standardov (MRS) / mednarodnih standardov računovodskega poročanja (MSRP), ki jih je izdal Odbor za mednarodne računovodske standarde.
7 Article 107 of Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013. 
7 Člen 107 Uredbe (EU) št.
The auditor’s responsibility 5. 
4 Revizorjeva odgovornost 5.
TheCourt’sresponsibilityis,onthebasisofitsaudit,toprovidethe European Parliament and the Council7 with a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. The Court conducts its audit in accordance with the IFAC International Standards on Auditing and Codes of Ethics and the INTOSAI International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions. 
Sodiščejeodgovorno,danapodlagisvojerevizijeEvropskemuparlamentu in Svetu predloži izjavo o zanesljivosti letnih računovodskih izkazov ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij.7 Sodišče izvede revizijo v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi revidiranja in etičnim kodeksom MZRS ter mednarodnimi standardi za vrhovne revizijske institucije INTOSAI.
These standards require the Court to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the annual accounts of the Office are free from material misstatement and the transactions underlying them are legal and regular. 
Ti standardi določajo, da mora Sodišče revizijo načrtovati in opraviti tako, da pridobi razumno zagotovilo, da je zaključni račun Urada brez pomembno napačnih navedb in da so z njim povezane transakcije zakonite in pravilne.
Theauditinvolvesperformingprocedurestoobtainauditevidenceaboutthe amounts and disclosures in the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. 
Revizijazajemaizvajanjepostopkovzapridobitevrevizijskihdokazovo zneskih in razkritjih v računovodskih izkazih ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij.
The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, which is based on an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the accounts and material non-compliance by the underlying transactions with the requirements in the legal framework of the European Union, whether due to fraud or error. 
Postopki so odvisni od revizorjeve presoje, ki temelji na oceni tveganja pomembno napačne navedbe v računovodskih izkazih ter pomembne neskladnosti med transakcijami, povezanimi z izkazi, ter zahtevami pravnega okvira Evropske unije, ne glede na to, ali gre za goljufijo ali napako.
5 considers any internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the accounts, as well as the supervisory and control systems that are implemented to ensure the legality and regularity of underlying transactions, and designs audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. 
Pri oceni tega tveganja revizor upošteva vse notranje kontrole, ki se izvajajo za pripravo in pošteno predstavitev računovodskih izkazov, ter nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme, s katerimi se zagotavljata zakonitost in pravilnost z njimi povezanih transakcij, da se pripravijo okoliščinam primerni revizijski postopki.
The audit also entails evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies, the reasonableness of accounting estimates and the overall presentation of the accounts. 
Med revizijo se tudi ovrednotijo primernost računovodskih usmeritev, sprejemljivost računovodskih ocen in celotna predstavitev računovodskih izkazov.
TheCourtconsidersthattheauditevidenceobtainedissufficientand appropriate to provide a basis for its statement of assurance. 
Sodiščemeni,dasopridobljenirevizijskidokazizadostnainustrezna osnova za njegovo izjavo o zanesljivosti.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts 8. 
5 Mnenje o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov 8.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts 9. 
Mnenje o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij 9.
IntheCourt’sopinion,thetransactionsunderlyingtheannualaccountsfor the year ended 31 December 2013 are legal and regular in all material respects. 
PomnenjuSodiščasotransakcije,povezanezletnimiračunovodskimi izkazi za proračunsko leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2013, v vseh pomembnih pogledih zakonite in pravilne.
10.The comments which follow do not call the Court’s opinions into question. 
10.Zaradi naslednjih pripomb mnenji Sodišča nista vprašljivi.
COMMENTS ON BUDGETARY MANAGEMENT 11.Budget implementation rates improved considerably, which indicates better planning and more timely implementation of activities. 
PRIPOMBE O UPRAVLJANJU PRORAČUNA 11.Stopnje izvrševanja proračuna so se močno izboljšale, kar kaže na boljše načrtovanje in bolj pravočasno izvajanje dejavnosti.
Although the level of cancelled carry-overs from 2012 is still relatively high at 28 % (2012: 45 %), ADB001938EN04-14PP-CH069-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_BEREC-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 6 carry-overs of committed appropriations decreased to 461 983 euro or 13 % (2012: 611 223 euro or 19 %). 
Čeprav je stopnja razveljavljenih prenosov iz leta 2012 z 28 % (v letu 2012 je znašala 45 %) še vedno razmeroma visoka, so se prenosi odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, za katera so bile prevzete obveznosti, zmanjšali na 461 983 EUR ali 13 % (leta 2012 so znašali 611 223 EUR ali 19 %).
Carry-overs were mostly related to contracts signed in the second half of 2013 for planned activities in 2013 and 2014. 
Prenosi so se nanašali predvsem na pogodbe za načrtovane dejavnosti v letih 2013 in 2014, sklenjene v drugi polovici leta 2013.
OTHER COMMENTS 12.Of the 1 183 reimbursements for experts made in 2013, 1 078 were late. 
DRUGE PRIPOMBE 12.Od 1 183 povračil za strokovnjake, izplačanih v letu 2013, jih je bilo 1 078 izplačanih z zamudo.
Where payments were late, they were overdue by an average delay of 78 days in the first half of 2013 as compared with 33 days in the second half of 2013. 
Zapoznela plačila so bila v prvi polovici leta 2013 izplačana povprečno v 78 dneh po roku, v drugi polovici pa v 33 dneh.
FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS YEARS’ COMMENTS 13.An overview of the corrective actions taken in response to the Court's comments from previous years is provided in Annex I. This Report was adopted by Chamber IV, headed by Mr Milan Martin CVIKL, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 1 July 2014. 
6 SPREMLJANJE UPOŠTEVANJA PRIPOMB IZ PREJŠNJIH LET 13.Pregled popravljalnih ukrepov, sprejetih na podlagi pripomb Sodišča iz prejšnjih let, je v Prilogi I. To poročilo je sprejel senat IV, ki ga vodi g.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President ADB001938EN04-14PP-CH069-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_BEREC-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
Za Računsko sodišče Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsednik ADB001938SL04-14PP-CH069-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_BEREC-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
1 Follow-up of previous years’ comments ANNEX I Year Court ́s comment Status of corrective action (Completed / Ongoing / Outstanding / N/A) 2011 The Court identified 21 cases with a total value of 94 120 euro in which appropriations carried over to 2012 did not correspond to legal commitments. 
1 Spremljanje upoštevanja pripomb iz prejšnjih let PRILOGA I Leto Pripomba Sodišča Status popravljalnega ukrepa (zaključen / se izvaja / neizveden / ni relevantno) 2011 Sodišče je odkrilo 21 primerov v skupni vrednosti 94 120 EUR, pri katerih odobrena proračunska sredstva, prenesena v leto 2012, niso ustrezala pravnim obveznostim.
These carry-overs were therefore irregular. Completed 2011 The Office had not yet adopted and implemented all the internal control standards. 
Ti prenosi so bili zato nepravilni. zaključen 2011 Urad še ni sprejel in začel izvajati vseh standardov notranjega kontroliranja.
Notably, no register of exceptions was introduced. Completed (register of exceptions) Ongoing (internal control standards) 2011 The Office needs to improve the transparency of recruitment procedures. 
Predvsem še ni uvedel registra izjem. zaključen (register izjem) se izvaja (standardi notranjega kontroliranja) 2011 Urad mora povečati preglednost postopkov zaposlovanja.
Questions for oral and written tests were not set before the applications were examined by the selection board, there was no decision of the Appointing Authority to appoint the selection board and the grade of the members of the selection board was not indicated. Completed 2012 The Office’s accounting system was still not validated by the Accounting Officer. Completed 2012 Committed appropriations carried over amounting to 61 500 euro (10 % of the total committed appropriations carried over) did not correspond to legal commitments and were thus irregular. 
Vprašanja za ustne in pisne preizkuse niso bila pripravljena, preden je izbirna komisija preučila prijave, ni bilo sklepa organa za imenovanja o imenovanju izbirne komisije, poleg tega pa ni bil naveden zaposlitveni razred članov izbirne komisije. zaključen 2012 Računovodja še ni potrdil računovodskega sistema Urada. zaključen 2012 Prenesena odobrena proračunska sredstva, ki so znašala 61 500 EUR (10 % vseh prenesenih odobrenih proračunskih sredstev), niso ustrezala pravnim obveznostim in so bila zato nepravilna. zaključen ADB001938SL04-14PP-CH069-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_BEREC-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
2 Year Court ́s comment Status of corrective action (Completed / Ongoing / Outstanding / N/A) 2012 The Office had not yet implemented the Internal Control Standards on ‘Objectives and performance indicators’ (ICS 5), ‘Process and procedures’ (ICS 8), ‘Document management’ (ICS 11) and ‘Information and Communication’ (ICS 12). 
2 Leto Pripomba Sodišča Status popravljalnega ukrepa (zaključen / se izvaja / neizveden / ni relevantno) 2012 Kazalniki ciljev in uspešnosti (standard notranje kontrole št.
Ongoing 2012 There is no procedure related to the registration and disposal of fixed assets and no physical inventory has been performed. Completed 2012 Procedures concerning the establishment, approval and recording of exceptions and deviations from policies and procedures have not been implemented. 
12). se izvaja 2012 Ni postopka za vpis in odtujitev osnovnih sredstev, fizični inventar pa ni bil popisan. zaključen 2012 Postopki za določanje, odobritev in evidentiranje izjem in odstopanj od usmeritev in postopkov niso bili izvedeni. zaključen 2012 Približno 101 000 EUR, kar je 45 % odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, prenesenih iz leta 2011, je zapadlo.
Appropriations for 2012 of 545 000 euro, 17 % of total 2012 appropriations, were not used and also had to be cancelled. 
Odobrena proračunska sredstva za leto 2012 v višini 545 000 EUR, kar znaša 17 % vseh odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za leto 2012, niso bila porabljena in so prav tako zapadla.
The level of carry-overs of committed appropriations to 2013 was high at 611 000 euro or 19 % of the total. 
Raven prenosa odobrenih proračunskih sredstev v leto 2013 je bila visoka, saj je znašala 611 000 EUR ali 19 % celote.
This indicates difficulties in the planning and/or implementation of the Office’s activities. 
To kaže na težave pri načrtovanju in/ali izvajanju dejavnosti Urada.
The carry-overs for 2012 were mostly related to delayed recruitments and the absence of an effective policy to ensure the timely presentation and reimbursement of mission costs claimed by experts. Ongoing 2012 There is considerable room for improving the preparation, execution and documentation of procurement procedures. 
Prenosi za leto 2012 so bili večinoma povezani z zamudami pri zaposlovanju in pomanjkanjem učinkovite politike za zagotovitev pravočasne predložitve in povračila stroškov službenih potovanj, ki jih prijavijo strokovnjaki. se izvaja 2012 Pripravo, izvajanje in dokumentiranje postopkov za javna naročila bi bilo mogoče zelo izboljšati.
As an example, award procedures did not give sufficient attention to the price quality ratio and general award criteria had not been further broken down into sub criteria to allow a clear and comparable evaluation of the offers. Completed ADB001938EN04-14PP-CH069-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_BEREC-OR.DOC 1.7.2014 
Postopki oddaje javnega naročila na primer niso namenili dovolj pozornosti razmerju med ceno in kakovostjo, splošna merila zanje pa niso bila podrobneje razdeljena na podmerila, ki bi omogočala jasno in primerljivo ovrednotenje ponudb. zaključen ADB001938SL04-14PP-CH069-14APCFIN-RAS-2013_BEREC-TR.DOC 1.7.2014
1 According to a note from the Commission’s accounting officer dated 27.10.2008, the minimum short term rating should be A-1. 
1 Glede na sporočilo računovodje Komisije z dne 27. oktobra 2008 bi morala biti minimalna kratkoročna bonitetna ocena A–1.