natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition the results and in particular the impact of a project are more likely to be limited if the objectives to be achieved are not clear from the beginning. (b) Missing indicators: in the absence of indicators neither the Commission nor the UN can measure performance and track results, monitor activities and broader outputs adequately and thus take corrective actions in time. (c) No baseline criteria: without baseline criteria improvements cannot be measured because there is no information on what the situation was like before the intervention started and therefore what the results should be measured against. 
Poleg tega je za rezultate in zlasti učinek projekta bolj verjetno, da bodo omejeni, če zastavljeni cilji od samega začetka niso jasni; (b) manjkajoči kazalniki: brez kazalnikov niti Komisija niti zN ne morejo ustrezno meriti uspešnosti, slediti rezultatom ter spremljati dejavnosti in širših izložkov, zato pa tudi ne pravočasno uvesti popravnih ukrepov; (c) ni temeljnih meril: brez temeljnih meril ni mogoče meriti izboljšav, ker ni informacij o stanju pred začetkom intervencije, zato tudi ne o tem, s čim bi bilo treba primerjati rezultate; 9 Člen 1.1 sporazuma fAfA določa: Predlogi zN vsebujejo cilje in kazalnike dosežkov, o katerih se sklene dogovor v sporazumu za specifični prispevek. merila uspešnosti bodo temeljila na ciljih, ki so specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, realistični in časovno opredeljeni.
(d) Weak logical link between activities and objectives: the funds used to finance the project’s activities should result in the achievement of the project’s objectives. 
(d) šibka logična povezava med dejavnostmi in cilji: zaradi sredstev, s katerimi se financirajo dejavnosti projekta, bi morali biti doseženi cilji projekta.
However, the logical link between the activities and the overall objectives, in particular those that are longer term, is not always clear. 
Vendar logična povezava med dejavnostmi in skupnimi cilji, zlasti dolgoročnimi, ni vedno jasna.
Consequently, although activities may have been successfully completed, the projects’ intended impact may not be achieved. (e) An unrealistic timeframe: results in an extension of the project at a later stage, which requires additional work and therefore resources from both, the Commission and the UN. (f) Underestimated risks: although risks are particularly high and difficult to assess in conflict-affected countries it is of importance that they are given due consideration at the planning stage. 
Posledično se lahko zgodi, da so dejavnosti uspešno končane, vendar načrtovani učinek projektov ni dosežen; (e) nerealističen časovni okvir: zaradi tega se izvajanje projekta na eni od poznejših stopenj podaljša, kar zahteva dodatno delo in sredstva Komisije in zN; (f) podcenjevanje tveganj: čeprav je tveganje v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih, posebno visoko in ga je posebno težko oceniti, je pomembno, da se ga na stopnji načrtovanja ustrezno upošteva.
EFFECTIVENESS AND SUSTAINABILITY OF THE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THE COMMISSION-FUNDED ACTIVITIES ACHIEVED SOME GOOD RESULTS IN DIFFICULT CIRCUMSTANCES 25. 
USPešnOSt in trajnOSt financiranih dejaVnOSti dejaVnOSti, ki jih je financirala kOmiSija, SO V težkih razmerah dOSeGle nekatere dObre rezUltate 25.
Effectiveness in the context of this audit is, in line with the Financial Regulation, defined as the attainment of objectives and the achievement of results. 
Uspešnost je pri tej reviziji v skladu s finančno uredbo opredeljena kot doseganje ciljev in rezultatov.
The Court assessed the effectiveness of a sample of 19 projects by comparing the intended objectives in the contribution agreement with the actual achievements. 
Sodišče je ocenilo uspešnost vzorca z 19 projekti, tako da je cilje, načrtovane v sporazumu o prispevku, primerjalo z dejanskimi dosežki.
The effectiveness was rated as: 19 Good If all objectives in terms of output as well as outcome have been achieved or are likely to be achieved Minor weaknesses If only the main objective(s) are likely to be achieved Serious weaknesses If the project will only partially achieve the main objective(s) Unsatisfactory If the main objectives were not or will not be achieved Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
Uspešnost je bila ocenjena kot: 19 dobra če so bili doseženi vsi cilji pri izložkih in izidu ali pa je verjetno, da bodo doseženi manjše slabosti če je verjetno, da bodo doseženi le glavni cilji resne slabosti če bo projekt le delno dosegel glavne cilje nezadovoljiva če glavni cilji niso bili ali ne bodo doseženi Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih
The cooperation with organisations of the UN has made aid possible in a very difficult operational environment. 
Sodelovanje z organizacijami zN je omogočilo pomoč v zelo težkih operativnih razmerah.
Whereas two projects achieved their objectives in full and were therefore rated as ‘good’, eight showed ‘minor weaknesses’ and five ‘serious weaknesses’. 
Čeprav so bili pri dveh projektih cilji v celoti doseženi in sta bila zato ocenjena kot „dobra“, so se pri osmih pokazale „manjše slabosti“ in pri petih „resne slabosti“.
Two projects were not fully implemented due to specific circumstances and therefore they did not achieve their main objective and are thus considered ‘unsatisfactory’. 
Dva projekta zaradi specifičnih okoliščin nista bila izvedena in zato nista dosegla svojega glavnega cilja, zato sta ocenjena kot „nezadovoljiva“.
Examples of the weaknesses noted can be found in Box 2 and for the overall result see Figure 4 and the Annex. 
Primeri ugotovljenih slabosti so v okviru 2, skupni rezultat pa je v diagramu 4 in Prilogi.
Due to insufficient information, the results could not be assessed in the following cases: (a) for one project, although all payments had been made, there was no specific report for the funded project; (b) one major project was a trust fund for which the objectives stated in the contribution agreement concerned the fund as a whole and were therefore of a more general nature. 
Rezultati zaradi premalo informacij niso mogli biti ocenjeni v naslednjih primerih: (a) pri enem projektu ni bilo nobenega specifičnega poročila o financiranem projektu, čeprav so bila izvršena vsa izplačila; (b) en velik projekt je bil skrbniški sklad, pri katerem so se cilji, navedeni v sporazumu o prispevku, nanašali na sklad kot celoto, zato so bili bolj splošne narave.
Although more specific objectives were defined for the underlying projects, there can be no clear link between the achievement of the project objectives and the general objectives in the contribution agreement. Consequently the effectiveness can only be assessed when the fund itself will be closed, which was not yet the case at the time of the audit. 
Čeprav so bili za s tem povezane projekte določeni bolj specifični cilji, ne more biti jasne povezave med doseganjem ciljev projekta in splošnih ciljev v sporazumu o prispevku. zato bo uspešnost mogoče oceniti šele, ko bo sklad zaprt, vendar je v času revizije še deloval.
20 FIGURE 4 2 8 5 2 2 10 133 122 19 207 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SAMPLED PROJECTS (BY NUMBER OF PROJECTS AND AMOUNTS REPRESENTED) Number of projects Amount (million euro) Good Minor weaknesses Serious weaknesses Unsatisfactory Insufficient evidence Source: European Court of Auditors. Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
20 diaGram 4 2 8 5 2 2 10 133 122 19 207 USPešnOSt PrOjektOV V VzOrcU (PO šteVilU PrOjektOV in zadeVnih zneSkih) Število projektov Znesek (v milijonih EUR) dobro manjše slabosti resne slabosti nezadovoljivo premalo dokazov Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče. Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih
BOX 2 21 EFFECTIVENESS EXAMPLES Project likely to achieve the intended results Support to the return and reintegration of returnees and internally displaced people inside Iraq: The project was still ongoing at the time of the audit. However, according to the September 2009 report the programme was progressing according to plan with several activities already achieved, like provision of shelters and safe drinking water, and others even exceeding the expected results. 
OkVir 2 21 Primeri USPešnOSti Projekt, za katerega je verjetno, da bo dosegel načrtovane rezultate Podpora vračanju in ponovni vključitvi povratnikov in notranje razseljenih oseb v Iraku: Projekt je v času revizije še potekal, vendar po poročilu iz septembra 2009 program poteka po načrtu in uresničenih je že več dejavnosti, kot so zagotavljanje zatočišč in varne pitne vode, pri nekaterih pa so rezultati celo presegli pričakovanja.
Projects which have not achieved the intended results Mine clearance in Afghanistan: The project has not achieved its intended results as only 1,6 km2 out of the 26,6 km2 as stated in the contribution agreement were actually de-mined. 
Projekti, ki niso dosegli načrtovanih rezultatov Odstranjevanje min v Afganistanu: Načrtovani rezultati projekta niso bili doseženi, saj so bile mine dejansko odstranjene le na 1,6 km2 od 26,6 km2, kot je bilo določeno v sporazumu o prispevku.
Emergency infrastructural support to the Ministry of Legal Affairs and Constitutional Development and the Judiciary of Southern Sudan: The project ended in March 2009 without providing the main output, to construct buildings for the Ministry of Legal Affairs and for the Judiciary of Southern Sudan. 
Nujna infrastrukturna podpora ministrstvu za pravne zadeve in ustavni razvoj ter sodstvu v južnem Sudanu: Projekt se je končal marca 2009, ne da bi zagotovil glavni izložek, izgradnjo stavb za ministrstvo za pravne zadeve in za sodstvo v južnem Sudanu.
After several delays and extensions of the contract, the sub-contracted building company became insolvent and the bank guarantees turned out to be falsified. 
Po več zamudah in podaljšanjih pogodbe je podizvajalsko gradbeno podjetje postalo nesolventno in izkazalo se je, da so bančna jamstva ponarejena.
The amount to be recovered was still under discussion at the time of the audit. 
V času revizije je še potekala razprava o znesku, ki ga je treba izterjati.
Project for which the impact is unclear International Reconstruction Fund Facility for Iraq: Apart from the objective to halve the infant mortality rate, where targets were set and the information available suggests that it has not been achieved, there was no means of assessing the extent to which the other long-term objectives were achieved as no indicators or baselines were defined and no reliable statistics were available. Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
Projekt, katerega učinek ni jasen mednarodni sklad za obnovo Iraka: Razen cilja prepolovitve stopnje umrljivosti dojenčkov, za katerega so bili določeni podcilji in razpoložljive informacije kažejo, da ni bil dosežen, ni bilo mogoče oceniti, v kakšnem obsegu so bili doseženi drugi dolgoročni cilji, ker niso bili določeni nobeni kazalniki ali temeljna merila in ni bilo na voljo nobenih zanesljivih statističnih podatkov. Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih
For the sample audited, no connection has been noted between the size of the project or the type of the activity financed and its effectiveness. 
Pri revidiranem vzorcu ni bila ugotovljena nobena povezava med velikostjo projekta ali vrsto financirane dejavnosti in njeno uspešnostjo.
The serious weaknesses noted in several projects were in general a result of deficiencies in project design and the lack of monitoring at a later stage. 
Resne slabosti, ugotovljene pri več projektih, so bile na splošno rezultat pomanjkljivega načrtovanja projektov in pomanjkanja spremljanja na poznejši stopnji.
Photo 2 — Construction of offices for the ‘Emergency infrastructural support to the Ministry of Legal Affairs and Constitutional Development and the Judiciary of Southern Sudan’ Source: European Court of Auditors. 22 Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
Fotografija 2 – Gradnja pisarn pri projektu „nujna infrastrukturna podpora ministrstvu za pravne zadeve in ustavni razvoj ter sodstvu v južnem Sudanu“ Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče. 22 Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih
23 RESULTS ARE OFTEN NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN THE PLANNED IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD 30. 
23 rezUltati POGOStO niSO dOSeženi V načrtOVanem ObdObjU izVajanja 30.
The time frame for each project is defined in its contribution agreement. 
Časovni okvir vsakega projekta je določen v njegovem sporazumu o prispevku.
The respect of this timeframe impacts effectiveness as well as efficiency due to the fact that: (a) delays result in extensions of the projects, which require additional work for the Commission staff; (b) time extensions result in the increase of certain costs categories, like staff costs, which have to be funded from the Commission’s fixed contribution. 
Spoštovanje tega časovnega okvira vpliva na uspešnost in učinkovitost, ker: (a) se zaradi zamud podaljša trajanje projektov, kar zahteva dodatno delo uslužbencev Komisije; (b) podaljšanja trajanja povzročajo povečanje nekaterih kategorij stroškov, kot so stroški za osebje, ki jih je treba financirati iz fiksnega prispevka Komisije. zato je za temeljne dejavnosti projekta na voljo manj sredstev.
Unless other funding is available, project activities will thus have to be curtailed; (c) delays in the implementation lead to a lack of confidence among the concerned parties and can affect the reputation of the Commission, as was clearly observed for two projects in Sudan. 
Če ni na razpolago drugih sredstev, je treba zaradi tega okrniti dejavnosti projekta; (c) zamude pri izvajanju zmanjšujejo zaupanje zadevnih strani in lahko vplivajo na ugled Komisije, kot je bilo jasno opaziti pri dveh projektih v Sudanu.
For the vast majority of projects in the sample the initial implementation period was considerably exceeded. 
Pri veliki večini projektov v vzorcu je bilo prvotno obdobje izvajanja močno preseženo.
This was to a large extent due to the fact that the time needed to achieve certain results had been underestimated in the contribution agreements, as not enough consideration was given to the difficult circumstances in the countries. 
V veliki meri je bila to posledica dejstva, da je bil v sporazumih o prispevku podcenjen čas, potreben za doseganje nekaterih rezultatov, ker niso bile dovolj upoštevane težke razmere v državah.
Four out of the 19 projects were implemented within the timeframe initially foreseen. 
Štirje projekti od 19 so bili izvedeni v prvotno predvidenem časovnem okviru.
In 12 cases the timeframe was exceeded and for five of these the implementation period was doubled or more than doubled. 
V 12 primerih je bil časovni okvir presežen, pri petih med njimi pa se je obdobje izvajanja podvojilo ali več kot podvojilo.
Notably two out of the four projects which were implemented within the initial timeframe were de-mining projects. 
Dva projekta od štirih, ki so bili izvedeni v prvotnem časovnem okviru, sta bila projekta odstranjevanja min.
For details on the delays noted see Annex and Figure 5. Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
Podrobnosti o ugotovljenih zamudah so v Prilogi in diagramu 5. Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih
For the remaining three projects the assessment of timely implementation is of limited significance for the following reasons: (a) for two of the three trust funds (in Sudan and Iraq) the implementation periods set out in the contribution agreements had, although legally binding, no practical effect as the relevant time schedules were those for the funds as such; (b) for one other project the assessment of the timeframe is still preliminary as the project was at an early stage of implementation. 
Pri ostalih treh projektih ima ocena pravočasnosti izvajanja omejen pomen, ker: (a) so bila pri dveh skrbniških skladih od treh (v Sudanu in Iraku) obdobja izvajanja, določena v sporazumih o prispevku, sicer pravno zavezujoča, vendar niso imela praktičnega učinka, ker sta bila relevantna časovna razporeda časovna razporeda za same sklade; (b) je pri enem projektu ocena časovnega okvira še vedno predhodna, saj je bil projekt v zgodnji stopnji izvajanja.
24 FIGURE 5 (1) EXTENSION OF THE INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD BY PROJECT Afg 1 Afg 2 Afg 3 Afg4–6 Afg 7 Afg 8 Afg 9 Iraq1–3 Iraq 4 Sudan 1 Sudan 2 Sudan 3 Sudan 4 Sudan 5 Sudan 6 Sudan 7 Sudan 8 Sudan 9 Sudan10 (1) (2) (3) 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 Initial duration (months) Extension (months) (1) For these two trust funds, although implementation periods were set in legally binding documents, they hardly had any practical effects. 
7 Afg. 8 Afg. 9 Irak1-3 Irak 4 Sudan 1 Sudan 2 Sudan 3 Sudan 4 Sudan 5 Sudan 6 Sudan 7 Sudan 8 Sudan 9 Sudan10 (1) (2) (3) 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 Prvotno trajanje (v mesecih) Podaljšanje (v mesecih) (1) Pritehdvehskrbniškihskladihsobilaobdobjaizvajanjadoločenavpravnozavezujočihdokumentih,vendarvendarnisoimela skoraj nobenega praktičnega učinka.
(2) At the time of the audit, the implementation of this project was still at an early stage. 
(2) Včasurevizijejebiloizvajanjetegaprojektašenazgodnjistopnji.
(3) At the time of the audit, a 12-month extension was under discussion but not yet approved. 
(3) Včasurevizijejepotekalarazpravao12-mesečnempodaljšanju,vendartošenibiloodobreno.
Sustainability in the context of this audit is defined as the extent to which results have been maintained after the Commission funding has ended. 
Pri tej reviziji je trajnost opredeljena kot obseg, v katerem so bili rezultati ohranjeni po koncu financiranja Komisije.
As the majority of projects in the sample had not yet been closed, the audit examined the likely sustainability of project results. 
Ker večina projektov v vzorcu še ni zaprta, je bila pri reviziji preučena verjetna trajnost njihovih rezultatov.
The basis for this assessment was the extent to which the necessary conditions for sustainability, i.e. ownership by the beneficiary, further funding, the necessary expertise and the political situation in the country or region, were fulfilled. The sustainability was rated as follows: 25 Good If the results were or will most likely be sustained as all conditions for sustainability are fulfilled Minor weaknesses If not all conditions for sustainability are fulfilled but nevertheless the main results are likely to be sustained Serious weaknesses If several or very important conditions for sustainability are not fulfilled and therefore there are reasonable doubts about the sustainability of the main project results Unsatisfactory In case there was evidence that the results will not be maintained 36. 
Osnova za to oceno je bil obseg, v katerem so bili izpolnjeni potrebni pogoji za trajnost, tj. lastništvo upravičenca, nadaljnje financiranje, potrebno strokovno znanje in politične razmere v državi ali regiji. trajnost je bila ocenjena kot: 25 dobra če so bili rezultati trajni ali je zanje zelo verjetno, da bodo trajni, ker so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za trajnost manjše slabosti če niso izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za trajnost, vendar bodo glavni rezultati verjetno vseeno trajni resne slabosti če ni izpolnjenih več pogojev ali pomembni pogoji za trajnost, zato obstajajo upravičeni dvomi o trajnosti glavnih rezultatov projektov nezadovoljiva v primeru, ko so obstajali dokazi, da rezultati ne bodo ohranjeni 36. trajnost štirih projektov v vzorcu je bila ocenjena kot „dobra“.
Five projects had ‘minor weaknesses’, two ‘serious weaknesses’ and one was considered ‘unsatisfactory’. 
Pet jih je imelo „manjše slabosti“, dva „resne slabosti“, pri enem pa je bila trajnost ocenjena kot „nezadovoljiva“.
For seven projects no assessment could be made as they were either still in an early phase of implementation (three cases), the information available was insufficient (two cases) or they had not achieved their main objectives and therefore there were no results to be sustained (two cases). 
Sedmih projektov ni bilo mogoče oceniti, ker so bili v zgodnji fazi izvajanja (v treh primerih) ali je bilo na voljo premalo informacij (v dveh primerih) ali niso dosegli svojih glavnih ciljev, zato ni bilo rezultatov, ki bi bili lahko trajni (v dveh primerih).
For an overview of the results see Annex and Figure 6 and examples can be found in Box 3. Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
Pregled rezultatov je v Prilogi in diagramu 6, primeri pa v okviru 3. Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih
The sample of projects audited showed that the conditions for sustainability vary in importance. 
Vzorec revidiranih projektov je pokazal, da je pomembnost pogojev za trajnost različna.
Those projects which were characterised by a strong ownership in combination with political stability were in fact the ones most likely to be sustainable. 
Dejansko je bilo najverjetneje, da bodo trajni projekti, za katere je bilo značilno močno lastništvo v kombinaciji s politično stabilnostjo.
26 FIGURE 6 4 5 2 1 2 5 30 219 17 100 11 114 SUSTAINABILITY OF RESULTS (BY NUMBER OF PROJECTS AND AMOUNTS REPRESENTED) Number of projects Amount (million euro) Good Minor weaknesses Serious weaknesses Unsatisfactory Insufficient evidence N/A Source: European Court of Auditors. Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
26 diaGram 6 4 5 2 1 2 5 30 219 17 100 11 114 trajnOSt rezUltatOV (PO šteVilU PrOjektOV in zadeVnih zneSkih) Število projektov Znesek (v milijonih EUR) dobra manjše slabosti resne slabosti nezadovoljiva premalo dokazov NR Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče. Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih
27 BOX 3 SUSTAINABILITY EXAMPLES Projects which are likely to be sustained Support to the fifth population census, Sudan: Although there was no exit strategy, there is adequate ownership from the beneficiary and future funding foreseen in the budget. Therefore the results had been sustained at least until the time of the audit which was one year after the implementation period had ended. 
27 OkVir 3 Primeri trajnOSti Projekti, za katere je verjetno, da bodo trajni Podpora za peti popis prebivalstva v Sudanu: Čeprav ni bilo izhodne strategije, sta lastništvo upravičenca in prihodnje financiranje, predvideno v proračunu, zadostna. zato so bili rezultati trajni vsaj do časa revizije, ki je potekala leto dni po koncu obdobja izvajanja.
Enhancing the capacity of Khartoum State in the delivery of vocational training services, Sudan: The training centres financed under this project are not yet operational. 
Krepitev zmogljivosti države Kartum pri zagotavljanju storitev poklicnega usposabljanja v Sudanu: centri za usposabljanje, ki so bili financirani v okviru tega projekta, še ne delujejo.
However, it is likely that the main results will be sustained, in particular due to the strong ownership by the beneficiary. 
Vendar je verjetno, da bodo glavni rezultati trajni, zlasti zaradi močnega lastništva upravičenca.