natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Long delays in the recording and recovery of debts, no reconciliation between the accounting records and debtorsŐ ledger. 
Velike zamude pri evidentiranju in izterjavi dolgov, računovodska dokumentacija in knjiga terjatev nista bili usklajeni.
Qualification was raised last year, recovery problems continued to be noted this year. 
Certifikacija je bila sprožena prejšnje leto, problemi z izterjavo so bili ugotovljeni tudi v tem letu.
Lengthy intervals between the notification of irregularities and their recording in the debtorsŐ ledger. 
Dolgi časovni razmiki med ugotovitvijo nepravilnosti in njihovim evidentiranjem v knjigi terjatev.
Debts understated by 3 %. Reasons for unsatisfactory work Scope of CBs debtorsŐ audit did not meet the requirements mentioned in the Commission guidelines. 
Razlogi za nezadovoljivo delo Obseg revizije terjatev s strani certifikacijskih organov ni izpolnil zahtev, omenjenih v smernicah Komisije.
Source: DebtorsŐ section in Certifying Body reports for EAGGF year 2002. 
Vir: Oddelek terjatve v poročilih certifikacijskega organa za EKUJS za leto 2002.
C 269/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 SUMMARY I. For the protection of its financial interests, Community legislation lays down reporting requirements as regards Community fields of activity (1). 
C 269/18 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.11.2004 POVZETEK I. Za varovanje svojih finančnih interesov zakonodaja Skupnosti določa zahteve za poročanje v zvezi s področji delovanja Skupnosti (1).
The Member States must send regular reports of irregularities which have been the subject of primary administrative or judicial findings of fact. 
Države članice morajo pošiljati redna poročila o nepravilnostih, ki so predmet primarnih upravnih ali sodnih ugotovitev o dejstvih.
Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 organises the system of communications of irregularities in the field of the expenditure by the EAGGF Ń Guarantee Section (European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund). 
595/91 ureja sistem obveščanja o nepravilnostih na področju izdatkov EKUJS, Jamstveni oddelek (Evropski kmetijski usmerjevalni in jamstveni sklad).
In order to facilitate exploitation of the information notified to the Commission, Community legislation contains a detailed list of the information to be provided, in particular the provision which has been infringed, the amounts in question, the practices used to commit the irregularity, and the natural or legal persons involved (2). 
Da bi olajšala uporabo informacij, sporočenih Komisiji, zakonodaja Skupnosti vsebuje podroben seznam informacij, ki jih je potrebno posredovati, zlasti predpis, ki je bil kršen, zadevne zneske, postopke, ki so bili uporabljeni pri zakrivitvi nepravilnosti, in imena vpletenih fizičnih ali pravnih oseb (2).
Member States have the obligation to prevent and deal with irregularities and to recover amounts lost as a result of irregularities or negligence (3). 
Države članice morajo preprečevati in odpraviti nepravilnosti ter povrniti zneske, zgubljene zaradi nepravilnosti ali malomarnosti (3).
Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 provides for the communication of all irregularities above EUR 4 000 to the Commission, meaning that all behaviour, intentional or not, that results in the infringement of a provision of Community law has to be communicated. 
595/91 predvideva, da se Komisijo obvesti o vseh nepravilnostih pri zneskih nad 4 000 EUR, kar pomeni, da se jo mora obvestiti o vsakem vedenju, namernem ali ne, katerega rezultat je kršitev določbe prava Skupnosti.
The Commission has taken different initiatives in order to ensure that cases should be identified as a fraud or an irregularity. 
Komisija je sprejela različne pobude, katerih namen je zagotoviti, da so primeri opredeljeni kot goljufija ali nepravilnost.
The mutual notification and information system thus established is the concrete expression of the mutual duties of sincere cooperation arising from Article 10 of the EC Treaty (4), on which the CommissionŐs antifraud strategy, defined in July 2000 (5), rests. 
Tako vzpostavljen vzajemen sistem obveščanja in informacijski sistem je konkreten izraz obojestranskih dolžnosti lojalnega sodelovanja iz člena 10 Pogodbe ES (4), na katerem temelji strategija Komisije proti goljufijam, določena julija 2000 (5).
This partnership between the Commission and the Member States is also the guiding principle behind the provisions of secondary legislation. 
To partnerstvo med Komisijo in državami članicami je tudi vodilno načelo določb sekundarne zakonodaje.
(2) Except for Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 implementing Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom on the system of the CommunitiesŐ own resources (OJ L 130, 31.5.2000), where this information is optional only. 
(2) Razen Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1150/2000 o izvajanju Sklepa 94/728/ES, Euratom o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Skupnosti (UL L 130, 31.5.2000), kjer so te informacije neobvezne.
(3) See Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2988/95 (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995) and Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999). 
(3) Glej člen 8 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2988/95 (UL L 312, 23.12.1995) in člen 8 Uredbe (ES) št.
(4) As confirmed by the Court in the Zwartfeld and Yugoslav maize cases. 
(4) Kakor je potrdilo Sodišče v primerih Zwartfeld in Yugoslav maize.
Case C-2/88 [1990] ECR I-3365, 13.7.1990; Case C-68/88 Commission v Greece [1989] ECR 2965. 
Primer C-2/88 [1990] PSES I-3365, 13.7.1990; primer C-68/88 Komisija proti Grčiji [1989] PSES 2965.
(5) COM(2000) 358 final of 28 June 2000 and Action Plan 2001-2003 (COM(2001) 254 final of 15 May 2001). 
(5) COM(2000) 358 konč. z dne 28. junija 2000 in Akcijski načrt 2001–2003 (COM(2001) 254 konč. z dne 15. maja 2001).
As the Council has stressed on a number of occasions, it is essential that the information supplied be consistent and of high quality if the Commission is to make the best use of it in stepping up the fight against fraud and ensuring that cases are properly followed up (6), at both national and Community level. 
Kakor je večkrat poudaril Svet, je bistveno, da so posredovane informacije dosledne in visokokakovostne, da jih Komisija lahko kar najbolje uporabi za pospeševanje boja proti goljufijam in zagotovi, da se primeri primerno nadalje obravnavajo (6), tako na nacionalni ravni kot na ravni Skupnosti.
The experience gained and the improvements realised will contribute to increasing the efficiency of the notification system and the reliability of the data. 
Pridobljene izkušnje in izvedene izboljšave bodo prispevale k povečevanju učinkovitosti sistema obveščanja in povečevanju zanesljivosti podatkov.
According to the Commission Report on the Protection of the Financial Interests of the Community and Fight Against Fraud Ń Annual Report 2002 hereafter referred to as ÔCommission Report 2002 on the fight against fraudŐ, the highest amounts affected by the irregularities were reported in the fruit and vegetable sector. 
Na podlagi poročila Komisije o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti in letnega poročila o boju proti goljufijam za leto 2002, v nadaljevanju „Poročilo Komisije o boju proti goljufijam za leto 2002“, so bili najvišji sporočeni zneski podvrženi nepravilnostim v sektorju sadja in zelenjave.
Member States were also informed of this trend in several meetings as Article 280 Working Group, Cocolaf and the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ. 
Na več sestankih, kot delovne skupine za člen 280, COCOLAF in delovne skupine „Nepravilnosti in vzajemna pomoč – kmetijski proizvodi“, so bile s tem trendom seznanjene tudi države članice.
The electronic data base storing the bulk of communications of irregularities transmitted by Member States has been subjected to a thorough quality check in 2003 by the Commission with the participation of Member States, which resulted in an improved internal consistency of the data while at the same time the figures were updated. 
Kakovost elektronske baze podatkov, ki hrani večino obvestil o nepravilnostih, posredovanih s strani držav članic, je Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami temeljito preverila leta 2003, kar je vodilo do večje notranje skladnosti podatkov, hkrati pa so bili osveženi številčni podatki.
The updated figures (see paragraph 30) outstanding at 31 December 2002 should read as follows: the total irregular payments reported since 1971 represent EUR 2 983 million. 
Osveženi številčni podatki (glej odstavek 30) na dan 31. decembra 2002 se glasijo: vsa nepravilna izplačila, sporočena od leta 1971, predstavljajo 2 983 milijonov EUR.
Of this sum, EUR 603 million (20 %) have been recovered and EUR 297 million have been written off (10 %). 
Od te vsote je bilo 603 milijonov (20 %) povrnjenih, 297 milijonov (10 %) pa odpisanih.
The amount still pending represents EUR 2 083 million (70 %). 
Zneski, ki se še obravnavajo, znašajo 2 083 milijonov EUR (70 %).
These figures include also the updates which the Commission received in the year 2003 and the financial impact of Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million). 
Te številke vključujejo tudi osvežene podatke, ki jih je Komisija prejela leta 2003 in finančni vpliv Odločbe Komisije 2003/481/ES (75 milijonov EUR).
Some Member States do not fulfil their obligation to report within two months of the end of the quarter in which an irregularity was detected and/or new information concerning an irregularity has become known (Regulation (EEC) No 595/91, Articles 3(1) and 5(1)). 
Nekatere države članice ne izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti, da morajo poročati v dveh mesecih po izteku četrtletja, v katerem je bila nepravilnost ugotovljena in/ali so prišle na dan nove informacije o nepravilnosti (Uredba (EGS) št. 595/91, člen 3(1) in člen 5(1)).
Among these Member States, Germany and Spain account for more than 50 % of the reported irregularities. 
Med temi državami članicami več kot 50 % sporočenih nepravilnosti velja za Nemčijo in Španijo.
The Commission has made Member States aware of this problem by reporting this in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2) and discussing the problem in several meetings as Article 280 Working Group, Cocolaf and the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ. 
Komisija je države članice s tem problemom seznanila tako, da je o tem poročala v Poročilu Komisije o boju proti goljufijam za leto 2002 (odstavek 10.2.2), ter tako, da je problem obravnavala na več sestankih, kot delovne skupine za člen 280, COCOLAF in delovne skupine „Nepravilnosti in vzajemna pomoč – kmetijski proizvodi“.
(6) Including the accounting and recovery aspects. 
(6) Vključno z računovodskimi in povračilnimi vidiki.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/19 As regards inconsistencies, Member States have been informed of these and were asked to update these cases by sending digital updates. 
4.11.2004 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 269/19 Kar se tiče neskladnosti, so bile države članice o njih obveščene in zaprošene, da osvežijo te primere tako, da pošljejo digitalne osvežitve.
In meetings of Article 280 Working group, Cocolaf and the Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ explanation and ÔtrainingŐ concerning the ECR (Electronic Case Registry) database were given to Member States. 
Na sestankih delovne skupine za člen 280, COCOLAF in skupine „Nepravilnosti in vzajemna pomoč – kmetijski proizvodi“ je bila državam članicam podana razlaga in „izobraževanje“ o zbirki podatkov ECR (elektronski register primerov).
In general it can be said that Member States have improved the reporting of irregularities, but not all obligations of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 are completely complied with. 
Na splošno bi lahko rekli, da so države članice izboljšale poročanje o nepravilnostih, vendar vse obveznosti Uredbe (EGS) št. 595/91 niso v celoti izpolnjene.
As regards discrepancies, the Commission will continue its efforts to oblige Member States to respect all provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 in order to receive within the delays provided for fully reliable data which contain homogeneous information from all Member States. 
Glede neskladij si bo Komisija še naprej prizadevala obvezati države članice k spoštovanju vseh določb Uredbe (EGS) št. 595/91, da se ob predvidenih zamudah prejmejo popolnoma zanesljivi podatki, ki vsebujejo enotne informacije od vseh držav članic.
The updated rate of recovery was established at 20,2 % in May 2004 (see paragraph 30). 
Osvežena stopnja povračila je bila maja 2004 20,2 % (glej odstavek 30).
The Commission is fully aware of the fact that the recovery rate in Member States is not optimal and has undertaken to improve it, in particular with the creation of the Task Force Recovery (see also answer to paragraph V). 
Komisija se popolnoma zaveda dejstva, da stopnja povračila v državah članicah ni optimalna, in se je zavezala, da jo izboljša, zlasti z oblikovanjem delovne skupine za povračilo (glej tudi odgovor na odstavek V).
Paying agencies and administrative bodies in charge of the recovery process in some Member States (Italy and Greece) have always claimed that they had to wait for the outcome of judicial criminal procedures before proceeding with the recovery, whereas the choice of a recovery process through a civil or administrative procedure is in some cases possible and does not preclude the launching of a parallel criminal judicial procedure. 
Plačilne agencije in upravni organi, zadolženi za postopek povračila v nekaterih državah članicah (Italija, Grčija), že od nekdaj trdijo, da morajo čakati na izid kazenskih postopkov pred sodiščem, preden lahko nadaljujejo s povračili, ker je izbira postopka povračila v civilnem ali upravnem postopku v nekaterih primerih možna in ne izključuje uvedbe vzporednega kazenskega postopka pred sodiščem.
Consequently, the initial choice of the Member State (administrative procedure, civil procedure, criminal procedure) will have consequences for the recovery delay. 
Posledično začetna izbira države članice (upravni, civilni ali kazenski postopek) vpliva na zamudo pri povračilu.
For a limited number of Member States, administrative recovery procedures can be launched only after a final decision in the criminal judicial procedure if any, bearing in mind that the latter might take 15 years or more. 
Za omejeno število držav članic so lahko uvedeni upravni postopki za povračilo šele po končni odločbi v kazenskem postopku pred sodiščem, če do nje sploh pride, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da lahko kazenski postopki pred sodiščem trajajo 15 let ali še dlje.
In Italy, for the pre-1995 cases, 46 % were subject to a criminal procedure whereas this percentage represented 18 % only for the cases posterior to 1995, which could be explained by the Member States deciding to take the necessary administrative steps as early as possible and as soon as there was a notification of the irregularity. 
V Italiji je bilo 46 % primerov pred letom 1995 obravnavanih v kazenskem postopku, medtem ko ta delež znaša le 18 % za primere po letu 1995, kar se da razložiti s tem, da se je država članica odločila za čimprejšnje sprejetje potrebnih upravnih postopkov, takoj po obvestilu o nepravilnosti.
In shared management, the Member State responsible is in direct contact with the debtors. 
Pri deljenem upravljanju je pristojna država članica v neposrednem stiku z dolžniki.
The Commission is not in a position to write off debts. According to Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 the Commission is legally obliged to exclude all expenditure from Community financing where that expenditure has not been executed in compliance with Community rules. 
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1258/1999 je Komisija pravno zavezana, da vse izdatke, ki niso bili porabljeni v skladu s predpisi Skupnosti, izključi iz financiranja Skupnosti.
Accepting compromise settlements and/or partial payments should be assessed on a case-by-case approach on the basis of national law and in conjunction with the criteria as laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999. 
O sprejetju poravnave in/ali delnega plačila se odloča od primera do primera in na osnovi nacionalnega prava v povezavi z merili, določenimi v členu 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 1258/1999.
V. Following the Communication of the Commission entitled ÔImproving the recovery of Community entitlements arising from direct and shared management of Community expenditureŐ of 3 December 2002 (COM(2002) 671 final), the Commission decided to set up a joint OLAF-Directorate-General for Agriculture Task Force Recovery in order to clear the burden of the past, i.e. all the irregularity cases prior to 1999 and still open in order to prepare a decision on whether the Community or the Member State bears the financial consequences. 
V. Na podlagi sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Kako izboljšati povračilo pri upravičenjih do prejemkov Skupnosti, ki izhajajo iz neposrednega in deljenega upravljanja izdatkov Skupnosti“ z dne 3. decembra 2002 (COM(2002) 671 konč.) se je Komisija odločila za ustanovitev skupne delovne skupine OLAF in Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo za povračilo, da se razjasni breme preteklosti, t. j. vsi primeri nepravilnosti pred letom 1999, ki so še vedno odprti, za pripravo odločitve o tem, ali finančne posledice nosi Skupnost ali država članica.
As regards the CourtŐs observation on the absence of adequate criteria for deciding whether sums written off should be charged to the Member States or borne by the Community, the Commission wishes to point out that it has developed, throughout time and on account of the acquired experience applied, four guiding principles and a number of procedural criteria documented in July 2002 (see also paragraph 44). 
Glede ugotovitve Sodišča, da ni primernih meril za odločanje, ali se odpisane zneske zaračuna državi članici ali pa bremenijo Skupnost, Komisija želi poudariti, da je v teku časa in na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj uvedla štiri vodilna načela in številna postopkovna merila, dokumentirana julija 2002 (glej tudi odstavek 44).
Since the creation of the Task Force Recovery in 2003, the Commission services have drawn up a list of detailed criteria with which all the cases are audited in order to have the amounts not recovered charged either to the Community or the Member State. 
Od ustanovitve delovne skupine za povračilo leta 2003 so službe Komisije pripravile seznam podrobnih meril, po katerih se revidirajo vsi primeri, da se nepovrnjene zneske zaračuna bodisi Skupnosti bodisi državi članici.
Following the allocation of responsibilities stated in Annex 2 to Commission Document SEC(95) 249 dated 10 February 1995, UCLAF/OLAF was to receive all communications notified by Member States under Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 and was responsible for the analysis and follow-up of the cases in question, including input of the data concerned into the irregularity database. 
V skladu z dodelitvijo pristojnosti, navedeno v Prilogi 2 k dokumentu Komisije SEC(95) 249 z dne 10. februarja 1995, naj bi UCLAF/OLAF prejel vsa obvestila, ki jih po Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št.
OLAF responsibility in matters of recovery action related to cases of fraud and irregularity includes the production of summary notes for each case containing a rsum of the procedures performed and the reasoning behind the proposals for possible financial correction within the clearance-of-accounts procedure undertaken under the responsibility of the Directorate-General for Agriculture as Authorising Officer. 
Pristojnost OLAF glede povračila, povezanega s primeri goljufij in nepravilnosti, vključuje pripravo povzetkov za vsak primer, ki vsebujejo posnetek izvedenih postopkov in argumentiranje predlogov za možne finančne popravke pri postopku potrditve obračunov, katerega izvedba je v pristojnosti Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo kot odredbodajalca.
The clearance procedure is conducted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture, but throughout its different steps, this DG is assisted by OLAF. See also paragraph IX. 
Postopek potrditve vodi Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo, vendar mu na različnih stopnjah pomaga OLAF (glej tudi odstavek IX).
The Commission always draws the legal consequences for the fraud proofing and control capability of the existing CAP regulations, taking on board in particular the follow-up recommendations of the Office. The Commission considers that the allocation of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture has been clearly defined: according to Annex 2 to the Communication of the Commission SEC(95) 249, OLAF is responsible in matters of recovery on reported irregularities. 
Komisija vedno spremlja pravne posledice dokazovanja goljufij in zmožnosti nadzora, ki izhaja iz obstoječih uredb SKP, pri čemer še posebej upošteva kasnejša priporočila urada. Komisija meni, da je bila dodelitev pristojnosti med OLAF in Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo jasno opredeljena: v skladu s Prilogo 2 k Sporočilu Komisije SEC(95) 249 je OLAF pristojen za povračilo pri sporočenih nepravilnostih.
C 269/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 VII. 
C 269/20 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 4.11.2004 VII.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1469/95 established, in the field of EAGGF Guarantee, a system for identifying economic operators who present a high risk for the Community Budget through a communication system via the Commission. 
1469/95 je za področje Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS določila način prepoznavanja gospodarskih subjektov, ki z uporabo sistema obveščanja prek Komisije predstavljajo visoko stopnjo tveganja za proračun Skupnosti.
After eight years of application of this Regulation, it appears that the number of communications is rather limited if not weak. 
Po osmih letih izvajanja te uredbe se zdi, da je število obvestil precej omejeno, če ne neznatno.
The Commission has extensively discussed the matter in the framework of the Irregularities and Mutual Assistance/Agriculture products group and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing comprehensive assessment of the blacklist Regulation and suggested options for action. 
Komisija je zadevo znatno obravnavala v okviru skupine „Nepravilnosti in vzajemna pomoč – kmetijski proizvodi“ in je zavezana, da Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi drugo poročilo z izčrpno oceno uredbe o črni listi in s predlaganimi možnostmi za ukrepanje.
There is a difference between the amounts contained in Table 105 (receivable which is certain and not subject to any condition, receivable of fixed amount expressed precisely in cash terms, receivable due and not subject to any payment time) for the EAGGF financial exercise and the amounts embodied in the ECR database (amount of quarterly reported irregularities for one particular term, which can be at that stage mere estimates subject to subsequent refinements). 
Obstaja razlika med zneski iz Tabele 105 (terjatev, ki je nedvoumna in z ničimer pogojena, terjatev v fiksnem znesku, natančno izražena v denarju, zapadla terjatev, za katero ni določen noben plačilni rok) za finančne sprostitve EKUJS in zneski iz zbirke podatkov ECR (znesek pri sporočenih nepravilnostih po četrtletjih in za točno določeno dobo, ki je lahko na tej stopnji zgolj približek in predmet naknadnega prečiščevanja).
The Commission has asked the Member States to undertake a tentative reconciliation of the ECR database with data of Table 105, bearing in mind that both sets of data will never coincide. 
Komisija je zaprosila države članice, da okvirno uskladijo zbirko podatkov ECR s podatki iz Tabele 105 in pri tem upoštevajo, da ta dva sklopa podatkov nikoli ne bosta skladna.
Until now, the first priority was to improve the quality of the data. 
Do zdaj je bila prva prioriteta izboljšati kakovost podatkov.
The data in the ECR database has now reached a level of reliability where it will be possible to compare the data. 
Podatki zbirke podatkov ECR so zdaj dosegli stopnjo zanesljivosti, ki omogoča primerjavo.
Member States should shift in the near future to the electronic format for reporting of irregularities. 
Države članice se morajo v bližnji prihodnosti preusmeriti na elektronsko obliko poročanja o nepravilnostih.