natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore the Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in cooperation with the other Structural Funds Directorates General are issuing regularly guidance notes on topics of common interest for improving the effectiveness of the management and control systems in place. 3.77. 
Poleg tega Generalni direktorat za pomorske zadeve in ribištvo v sodelovanju z drugimi generalnimi direktorati za strukturne sklade redno izdaja navodila o temah skupnega interesa zaradi izboljšanja učinkovitosti uvedenih sistemov upravljanja in nadzora.
See Commission’s replies in Annex 3.4. 3.77. 
3.77 Glej odgovore Komisije v Prilogi 3.4.
EN 86 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 Assessment of selected supervisory and control systems — Rural Development Fund Administrative procedures and controls to ensure correct payment including quality of databases On-the-spot inspection methodology, selection, execution, quality control and reporting of individual results Implementation and control of GAEC/Cross-compliance EAFRD EAFRD EAFRD EAFRD EAFRD EAFRD SAPARD N/A EAFRD Member State (Paying agency) Austria Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany (Bavaria) France Greece Romania UK (England) Overall assessment of supervisory and control systems Overall assessment Overall assessment 2009 2008 2007 Legend: N/A Effective Partially effective Not effective Not applicable: payments audited not subject to cross-compliance 
SL 86 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 Ocena izbranih nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov – razvoj podeželja Država članica (plačilna agencija) Avstrija Bolgarija Češka Nemčija (Bavarska) Francija Grčija Romunija Združeno kraljestvo (Anglija) Skupna ocena nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov Skupna ocena Skupna ocena Sklad Administrativni postopki in kontrole za zagotovitev pravilnega plačila, vključno s kako­ vostjo podatkovnih zbirk Metodologija inšpekcij­ skih pregledov na kraju samem, izbor, izvedba, nadzor kakovosti in sporočanje posameznih rezultatov Izvajanje in kontrola GAEC/navzkrižne sklad­ nosti EKSRP EKSRP EKSRP EKSRP EKSRP EKSRP SAPARD NR EKSRP 2009 2008 2007 Legenda NR uspešno delno uspešno neuspešno ni relevantno: za revidirana plačila se ne uporablja navzkrižna skladnost
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 87 Main DGs concerned Nature of declaration given by Director-General (*) Reservations given Court observations Overall assessment of reliability DG AGRI with reservations DG ENV with reservations DG MARE with reservations Eligibility of payments made to Member States to compensate addi­ tional costs in the marketing of certain fisheries products from the Outermost Regions. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 87 Glavni zadevni generalni Vrsta izjave, ki jo poda generalni Pridržki Opažanja Sodišča Skupna ocena zanesljivosti direktorati direktor (*) GD AGRI s pridržki GD ENV s pridržki GD MARE s pridržki Upravičenost plačil državam članicam za povrnitev dodatnih stro­ škov pri trženju nekaterih ribiških proizvodov iz najbolj oddaljenih regij.
Serious deficiencies in the IACS in Bulgaria and Romania. 
Resne pomanjkljivosti v IAKS v Bolgariji in Romuniji.
The Court’s systems audit conducted in the framework of the DAS 2009 confirmed that the IACS in Greece is still not effective in ensuring the regularity of payments; i.e. especially for grassland the eligibility rates recorded in the LPIS are not reliable (see paragraph 3.38), the claim database is affected by serious audit trail deficiencies (see paragraph 3.40) and the on-the-spot checks are of insuf­ ficient coverage and quality (see paragraph 3.46). 
Revizija sistemov, ki jo je Sodišče opravilo v okviru DAS 2009, je potrdila, da IAKS v Grčiji še vedno ni uspešen pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti plačil, zlasti za travišča so v LPIS evidentirane nezanesljive stopnje upravičenosti (glej odstavek 3.38), na podatkovno zbirko zahtevkov vplivajo resne pomanjkljivosti pri revizijski sledi (glej odstavek 3.40), obseg in kakovost pregledov na kraju samem pa sta nezadostna (glej odstavek 3.46).
Furthermore, the Commission in its 2009 Annual Activity Report states that the accreditation of the Greek paying agency has been limited to EAFRD measures as of claim year 2010. 
Poleg tega je v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih Komisije za leto 2009 navedeno, da je bila akreditacija grške plačilne agencije od leta vložitve zahtevkov 2010 omejena na ukrepe EKSRP.
The Court considers that in these circumstances the reservation for Greece should not have been lifted. 
Sodišče meni, da zaradi tega pridržek za Grčijo ne bi smel biti umaknjen.
Expenditure for rural development measures under Axis 2 (improving the environment and the countryside) of the 2007-2013 programming period. 
Odhodki za razvoj podeželja v okviru osi 2 (izboljšanje okolja in podeželja) v programskem obdobju 2007–2013.
Eligibility of expenditures declared by beneficiaries of grants. 
Upravičenost odhodkov, ki so jih prijavili upravičenci za donacije.
It is noted that DG ENV calculated its ‘error rate’ on a non-standard basis (risk based). 
Treba je opozoriti, da je GD ENV „stopnjo napake“ izračunal na nestandardni osnovi (na osnovi tveganja).
Management and Control Systems for identified operational programmes and measures of the FIFG (Germany, UK, Spain, France). 
Upravljavski in kontrolni sistemi za opredeljene operativne programe in ukrepe FIUR (Nemčija, Združeno kraljestvo, Španija, Francija).
ANNEX 3.3 RESULTS OF REVIEW OF COMMISSION MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS FOR AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES The reservation is based on the error rates resulting from the on-the-spot controls carried out by the Member States in 2008. 
PRILOGA 3.3 REZULTATI PREGLEDA POSLOVODSKIH PREDSTAVITEV KOMISIJE ZA KMETIJSTVO IN NARAVNE VIRE Pridržek temelji na stopnjah napak, ki so posledica kontrol na kraju samem, ki so jih leta 2008 izvedle države članice.
These errors rates vary widely from one Member States to another. 
Te stopnje napak se med državami članicami močno razli­ kujejo.
The Director-General does not explain why his reservation applies to all the transactions carried out in the European Union, and not only to the trans­ actions carried out in the Member States where the error rate was, in 2008, particularly high. 
Generalni direktor ne pojasnjuje, zakaj njegov pridržek velja za vse transakcije, izvedene v Evropski uniji, ne pa samo na transakcije, izvedene v državah članicah, v katerih je bila stopnja napak v letu 2008 posebej visoka.
The Court, however, agrees that, in general, irregularities are more probable for transactions of Axis 2 than for transactions of other Axes. B 
Vendar se Sodišče strinja, da so nepravilnosti na splošno bolj verjetne za transakcije v okviru osi 2 kot za transkacije v okviru drugih osi. B
EN 88 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 Main DGs concerned Nature of declaration given by Director-General (*) Reservations given Court observations Overall assessment of reliability DG SANCO without reservations N/A DG SANCO considers that a residual error would be material if its financial impact on the financial statements would be higher than 2 % of the annual budget of DG SANCO. 
SL 88 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 Glavni zadevni generalni Vrsta izjave, ki jo poda generalni Pridržki Opažanja Sodišča Skupna ocena zanesljivosti direktorati direktor (*) GD SANCO brez pridržkov NR GD SANCO meni, da bi bile preostale napake pomembne, če bi bil njihov finančni učinek na računovodske izkaze višji od 2 % letnega proračuna GD SANCO.
However, only the budget of the corresponding activity (ABB) should be taken into account, as indicated by DG BUDG. 
Vendar bi bilo treba upoštevati samo proračun ustrezne dejavnosti (ABB – k dejavnostim usmerjen proračun), kot je določil GD BUDG.
Based on the results of the ex-post control of 2009 and taking into account the recurrent character of the high level of detected errors above the materiality threshold (6 %), a reservation should have been issued for the Food and Feed Safety activity (ABB), for which the error rate was 6,9 %. (*) By reference to the Declaration of Assurance of Director-General, he/she has reasonable assurance that the control procedures put in place give the necessary guarantees concerning the regularity of transactions. A: The Director-General's declaration and the annual activity report give a fair assessment of financial management in relation to regularity. 
Na osnovi rezultatov naknadnih kontrol leta 2009 in ob upoštevanju ponavljanja visoke ravni odkritih napak nad pragom pomembnosti (6 %) bi bilo treba izraziti pridržek za dejavnosti na področju varnosti živil in krme (ABB), za katere stopnja napake znaša 6,9 %. (*) Izjava generalnega direktorja o zanesljivosti pomeni, da ima razumno zagotovilo, da vzpostavljeni kontrolni postopki dajejo potrebna jamstva o pravilnosti transakcij. A: Izjava generalnega direktorja in letno poročilo o dejavnostih vsebujeta pošteno oceno finančnega poslovodenja, kar zadeva pravilnost.
C: The Director-General's declaration and the annual activity report do not give a fair assessment of financial management in relation to regularity. 
C: Izjava generalnega direktorja in letno poročilo o dejavnostih ne vsebujeta poštene ocene finančnega poslovodenja, kar zadeva pravilnost.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 89 DG Court observation Rural development Action taken Court analysis Commission reply AGRI Interest rate subsidies: the procedures in place do not ensure an adequate audit trail with the result that the regularity of the payment of the EU subsidies to the final beneficiaries cannot According to the Commission France has introduced a new administrative system which from 2008 onwards makes it easier to track the loan from the bank to the final bene­ ficiary. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 89 GD Opažanje Sodišča Razvoj podeželja Sprejeti ukrepi Analiza Sodišča Odgovor Komisije AGRI Subvencije za obresti: vzpostavljeni postopki ne zagotavljajo ustrezne revizijske sledi, kar pomeni, da ni možno preverjati pravilnosti plačil subvencij EU končnim upravičencem Po podatkih Komisije je Francija uvedla nov administrativni sistem, ki od leta 2008 dalje lajša sledenje posojila od banke do končnega upravičenca.
The certification body examined all the payments made in 2009 to banks which granted reduced interest rates. 
Certifikacijski organ je preveril vsa leta 2009 izvedena plačila bankam, ki so odobrile znižane obrestne mere.
The certification body found the payments correct, but noted that the new system still did not ensure a complete traceability of all the individual loans to which a bank invoice refers. 
Certifikacijski organ je ugotovil, da so plačila pravilna, vendar je opozoril, da novi sistem še vedno ne zago­ tavlja popolne sledljivosti vseh posameznih posojil, za katera je bil izdan račun banke.
The Commission followed up the question with specific checks in France. 
Komisija je v zvezi s tem vprašanjem nadaljnje ukrepala s specifičnimi pregledi v Franciji.
In 2009 it was still difficult to establish a link between a bank invoice for the amount of interest reductions granted by the bank in a given period and individual loans to final beneficiaries. The Commission considers, on the basis of its own audit, that the audit trail can indeed be followed. Rural development be verified (France) (paragraph 5.15 (*)). 
Leta 2009 je bilo še vedno težko vzpostaviti Komisija na podlagi lastne revizije ugotavlja, da je povezavo med računom banke za znesek revizijsko sled mogoče spremljati. znižanja obrestne mere, ki ga je banka odob­ rila v nekem obdobju, in posameznimi posojili Razvoj podeželja (Francija) (odstavek 5.15 (*)). končnim upravičencem.
AGRI Further efforts are required in the area of rural development to further simplify the rules and Action was taken in 2009 by the Council and the Commission. 
AGRI Dodatna prizadevanja so potrebna na področju razvoja podeželja, da se pravila in pogoji še Leta 2009 sta ukrepala Svet in Komisija.
In the framework of the Council, concrete proposals for simplification of various aspects of the common agricultural policy were submitted by sixteen Member States. 
V okviru Sveta je 16 držav članic predložilo konkretne predloge za poenostavitev različnih vidikov skupne kmetijske politike.
Certain proposals concerned the simplification of rules and controls applying to cross-compliance and were therefore relevant to rural development. 
Nekateri predlogi so zadevali poenostavitev pravil in kontrol, ki veljajo za navzkrižno skladnost, zato so bili pomembni za razvoj podeželja.
The Commission services examined the proposals and envisaged to submit to the Council in 2010 appropriate amendments to the existing rules. 
Službe Komisije so preverile predloge in pred­ videle, da bodo v letu 2010 Svetu predložile ustrezne spremembe obstoječih pravil.
At its meeting of 14-16 December 2009 the Council expressed satisfaction for the intention of the Commission to follow up on a number of proposals and invited the Commission to come forward with the amendments suggested and to continue working on various ongoing simplification projects. 
Na svojem zasedanju od 14. do 16. decembra 2009 je Svet izrazil zadovoljstvo z namero Komisije, da bo v zvezi s predlogi nadalje ukrepala, in Komisijo pozval, naj pripravi pred­ loge sprememb in nadaljuje različne projekte za poenostavljanje, ki trenutno potekajo.
The steps taken in 2009 show that attention was paid to the necessity of simplifying certain rules and conditions applying to rural devel­ opment measures. 
Ukrepi, uvedeni v letu 2009, kažejo, da je bila pozornost usmerjena v poenostavljanje neka­ terih pravil in pogojev, ki veljajo za ukrepe razvoja podeželja.
As rural development expenditure is governed also by national rules, the Court, in accordance with the Council’s recommendation on the discharge for the financial year 2008, reminds that simplification should be achieved also at national level. 
Ker odhodke za razvoj podeželja urejajo tudi nacionalna pravila, Sodišče v skladu s priporočilom Sveta o razreš­ nici za proračunsko leto 2008 opozarja, da je treba poenostavitve doseči tudi na nacionalni ravni.
See Commission's reply to point 3.74. conditions (paragraph 5.66 (**)). 
Glej odgovor Komisije na točko 3.74. bolj poenostavijo (odstavek 5.66 (**)).
ANNEX 3.4 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS FOR AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES 
PRILOGA 3.4 NADALJNJE UKREPANJE PO PREJŠNJIH OPAŽANJIH ZA KMETIJSTVO IN NARAVNE VIRE
EN 90 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 DG IACS Court observation Action taken Court analysis Commission reply AGRI Greece For many years the Court raised the problem of insufficient implementation of the IACS in Greece. 
SL 90 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 GD IAKS Opažanje Sodišča Sprejeti ukrepi Analiza Sodišča Odgovor Komisije AGRI Grčija Sodišče že več let opozarja na težave v zvezi z nezadostnim izvajanjem IAKS v Grčiji.
The LPIS in Greece is incomplete and contains errors in the referencing of parcels. 
V Grčiji LPIS ni celovit in vsebuje napake pri določanju referenčnih parcel.
Furthermore, there were deficiencies noted in administrative and on-the-spot controls. 
Poleg tega so bile opažene pomanjkljivosti pri administrativnih kontrolah in kontrolah na kraju samem.
The DG AGRI Annual Activity Report up to the Year 2007 included a reservation on IACS in Greece. 
Letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD AGRI je do leta 2007 vsebovalo pridržek v zvezi z IAKS v Grčiji.
In 2008 the Commission decided that as of the 2009 claim procedure all the elements of the IACS in Greece are in place and operational and the reservation can be lifted. 
Leta 2008 se je Komisija odločila, da so od postopka vložitve zahtevkov za leto 2009 naprej vsi elementi IAKS-a v Grčiji vzposta­ vljeni in delujejo, zato se lahko pridržek umakne.
The Court’s systems audit conducted in the framework of the DAS 2009 confirmed that the IACS in Greece is still not effective in ensuring the regularity of payments; i.e. the LPIS/GIS in Greece is still not fully operational, the claim database is affected by unreliable audit trail, and the on-the-spot controls are of insufficient coverage and quality (paragraphs 3.37, 3.39 and 3.45 (***)). 
Revizija sistemov, ki jo je Sodišče opravilo v okviru DAS 2009, je potrdila, da IAKS v Grčiji še vedno ni uspešen pri zagotavljanju pravil­ nosti plačil, tj. LPIS-GIS v Grčiji še vedno ne deluje v celoti, na podatkovno zbirko zahtevkov vpliva nezanesljiva revizijska sled, obseg in kakovost kontrol na kraju samem pa sta nezadostna (odstavki 3.37, 3.39 in 3.45 (***)).
The Commission accepts that there were problems with the Greek IACS in the past, however with the new LPIS-GIS in operation the problems have been resolved for risk has been reduced from claim year 2009. 
Komisija se strinja, da so se v preteklosti pojavile težave z grškim IAKS, po vzpostavitvi novega LPIS-GIS pa so bile težave odpravljene in tveganje se je glede na leto oddaje zahtevkov 2009 zmanjšalo.
Other Member States The DG AGRI accreditation audit of the OPEKEPE agency in 2009 revealed serious defi­ ciencies relating to EAGF fund management (DG AGRI AAR 2009, A.1.3, p. 
Pri akreditacijski reviziji agencije OPEKEPE, ki jo je leta 2009 izvedel GD AGRI, so se poka­ zale resne pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z upravlja­ njem sredstev EKJS (letno poročilo o dejavno­ stih GD AGRI 2009, A.1.3, str.
With regard to the accreditation audit of the OPEKEPE agency in 2009 serious deficiencies revealed by DG AGRI related to EAFRD, rather than EAGF. 
V zvezi z revizijo za akreditacijo agencije OPEKEPE v letu 2009 je GD AGRI odkril hude pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile povezane z EKSRP in ne z EKJS.
The Commission considers that the deficiency found in UK has very limited impact on the system. 
Komisija meni, da ima pomanjkljivost, odkrita v Združenem kraljestvu, zelo omejen vpliv na sistem.
The results of the actions taken by the Commission and by the Member States cannot yet be assessed. 
Rezultatov izvedenih ukrepov Komisije in držav članic še ni mogoče oceniti.
The completion of the action plans is only foreseen for 2011 and there are already some delays in the imple­ mentation of individual actions. (DG AGRI AAR 2009) The Commission is following up the cases reported in the framework of conformity clearance procedures. 
Izpolnitev akcijskih načrtov je predvidena šele za leto 2011, pri izvajanju posameznih ukrepov pa je že prišlo do zamud (letno poročilo GD AGRI 2009). Komisija je ugotovila, da je v letu oddaje zahtevkov 2008 prišlo do precejšnjih pomanjkljivosti v Bolgariji in Romuniji.
Other Member States have problems of a lesser nature in their IACS which do not render their systems ineffective but, rather, perfectible. 
Pri drugih državah članicah so bile ugotovljene manjše pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z njihovimi IAKS, vendar to še ne pomeni, da so njihovi sistemi neučin­ koviti, temveč jih je treba le izboljšati.
For these Member States, action plans have been established and the problems found in previous years have been rectified or are making sufficient progress in that direction. 
Za te države članice so bili vzpostavljeni akcijski načrti, tako da so bile težave, ugotovljene v prejšnjih letih, odpravljene oziroma je prišlo do bistvenega napredka v smeri njihove odprave.
For the 2008 claim year the deficiencies in LPIS were noted in Greece, Cyprus, Lithuania, Italy and Spain (paragraph s 3.37 and 3.38 (***)). 
Za leto vložitve zahtevkov 2008 so bile pomanjkljivosti v LPIS opažene v Grčiji, na Cipru, v Litvi, Italiji in Španiji (odstavka 3.37 in 3.38 (***)).
The Court noted again weaknesses in the system managing the application of sanctions. 
Sodišče je ponovno opazilo slabosti v sistemu za upravljanje uporabe sankcij.
For Greece, Italy, Spain, and Portugal weaknesses in administrative controls are part of ongoing conformity procedures. 
Za Grčijo, Italijo, Španijo in Portugalsko so slabosti v administrativnih kontrolah del stalnih postopkov potrditve skladnosti.
The Court recommends that the systems weak­ nesses identified are resolved. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj se ugotovljene slabosti sistemov odpravijo.
EN 9.11.2010 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 91 SPS AGRI The audit found systematic shortcomings in calculation of the entitlements (paragraphs 5.22 to 5.26 (*), 5.38 (**)). 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 91 SEP AGRI Z revizijo so bile ugotovljene sistematične pomanjkljivosti pri izračunavanju pravic (odstavki 5.22 do 5.26 (*), 5.38 (**)).
The Commission is following the cases reported in the framework of conformity clearance procedures. 
Komisija nadalje ukrepa pri primerih, o katerih se je poročalo v okviru postopkov za potrditev skladnosti.
3.41, 3.44, 3.45 (***)). DG Court observation Action taken Court analysis Commission reply LPIS The Court found substantial deficiencies of LPIS in two Member States that seriously affect the efficiency of administrative cross-checks (BG and UK). 
Komisija spremlja pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile oprede­ GD Opažanje Sodišča Sprejeti ukrepi Analiza Sodišča Odgovor Komisije LPIS Sodišče je v dveh državah članicah odkrilo precejšnje pomanjkljivosti v LPIS, ki resno vpli­ vajo na učinkovitost navzkrižnih preverjanj (BG in UK).
In another Member State (ES) ineligible areas (partially wooded and/or rocky mountain grazing land) were accepted for payment due to the generous coefficients applied. (paragraph 5.36 (**)). 
V drugi državi članici (ES) so bile zaradi uporabe velikodušnih koeficientov za plačilo sprejete neupravičene površine (delno poraščene z gozdom in/ali skalnati gorski pašniki) (odstavek 5.36 (**)).
The Commission amended the Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 (amendment in Regulation (EC) No 146/2010) with the requirement for the MS to make an annual assessment of the quality of their LPIS and when appropriate to draw up an action plan to remedy the defi­ ciencies identified. 
1122/ 2009 (sprememba v Uredbi (ES) št. 146/2010) z zahtevo, naj države članice izvedejo letno oceno kakovosti svojih LPIS in, če je potrebno, pripravijo akcijski načrt za odpravo ugoto­ vljenih pomanjkljivosti (letno poročilo o dejav­ nostih GD AGRI 2009, str.
48) In some countries the graphical layer of the LPIS (GIS) contains outdated aerial photos (paragraphs 5.30(b) and(c) (*)). 
48). V nekaterih državah grafični sloj LPIS (GIS) vsebuje samo zastarele posnetke iz zraka (odstavek 5.30(b) in (c) (*)).
The Commission is following up the cases reported in the framework of conformity clearance procedures. 
Komisija nadalje ukrepa pri primerih, o katerih se je poročalo v okviru postopkov za potrditev skladnosti.
The Court also found in one Member State no adequate capping of payment based on ortho-photos (PL). 
Sodišče je prav tako odkrilo, da v eni državi članici ni bilo ustrezne omejitve plačila na podlagi orto-foto posnetkov (PL).
Administrative controls Weaknesses in administrative controls in the direct coupled payments have been identified in DAS 2007 audit in Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal: wrong input of application data, payment for multiple incompatible aid schemes on the same parcel and a failure to correctly apply penalties and sanctions, leading to overpayments. (5.27(a) (*)). 
Administrativne kontrole Pri reviziji za DAS za leto 2007 so bile v Grčiji, Italiji, Španiji in na Portugalskem ugoto­ vljene slabosti v administrativnih kontrolah neposredno vezanih plačil: napačen vnos poda­ tkov iz zahtevkov, plačila za več nezdružljivih shem pomoči za isto parcelo ter nepravilna uporaba kazni in sankcij, kar je povzročalo preplačila (5.27(a) (*)).
The re-performances of controls carried out by the Court found a number of specific weak­ nesses in the quality of the on-the-spot controls and identified ineligible areas or parcels that should have been excluded by the national inspectors. 
Pri ponovitvi kontrol, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče, je to ugotovilo več specifičnih slabosti v kako­ vosti kontrol na kraju samem ter opredelilo neupravičene površine ali parcele, ki bi jih morali nacionalni inšpektorji izločiti (Grčija, Italija, Španija, Portugalska) (odstavek 5.28 (*)).