natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EU support to the APSA since its creation back in 2004, both in terms of capacities as well as of financial ownership, has been instrumental to contribute to the development of this architecture Đ although expected results have not systematically been reached. 
Podpora EU Afriški strukturi za mir in varnost je od ustanovitve leta 2004 v smislu zmogljivosti kot tudi finančnega lastništva bistveno prispevala k razvoju te strukture, čeprav pričakovani rezultati niso bili sistematično doseženi.
It is agreed by the Commission, the EEAS and the EU Member States that it is in the EU's specific interest to support African solutions to African peace and security problems in order to stabilise Africa. 
Komisija, ESZD in države članice EU so se dogovorile, da je podpora afriških rešitev na afriške mirovne in varnostne težave za stabilizacijo Afrike v interesu EU.
This is the core business of the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA), which the EU is supporting. 
To je temeljna dejavnost Afriške strukture za mir in varnost, ki jo podpira EU.
It is a long term endeavour, for which results cannot be measured immediately. 
Gre za dolgoročni proces, katerega rezultatov ni mogoče takoj izmeriti.
Operationally, the EU objective is to be reached through a clearly formulated strategy: the 2016-2020 APSA Roadmap. 
Z operativnega vidika je cilj EU moč doseči z jasno opredeljeno strategijo: časovni načrt APSA za obdobje 2016–2020.
The implementation of this Roadmap is directly supported through a set of programmes, especially the ongoing third phase of the APSA Support Programme ('APSA III'). 
Izvajanje tega načrta je neposredno podprto s sklopom programov, zlasti v tekoči tretji fazi programa podpore za Afriško strukturo za mir in varnost (APSA III).
The activities under APSA III are further detailed through annual work plans, which allow for a prioritisation of EU's support and for benchmarking of concrete results against concrete objectives. 
Dejavnosti v okviru APSA III so podrobneje opisane v letnih delovnih načrtih, ki omogočajo prednostno razvrstitev podpore EU in primerjalno analizo konkretnih rezultatov s konkretnimi cilji.
In order to deliver on those results, the COM covers a set of activities, the implementation of which requires supporting operational costs such as trainings, travels, and salaries. 
Da bi dosegla te rezultate, Komisija pokriva vrsto dejavnosti, katerih izvajanje zahteva podporo operativnim stroškom, kot so usposabljanja, potovanja in plače.
Contributing to salaries or other operational costs is not an issue in itself as long as it is linked to achieving results, as it is part of a wider support strategy and as a clear exit strategy is outlined. 
Prispevanje k plačam ali drugim operativnim stroškom samo po sebi ne predstavlja težav, dokler je kot del širše strategije za podporo povezano z doseganjem rezultatov in ima izrisano jasno izhodno strategijo.
The Commission and the EEAS are of the view that administrative reforms at the African Union have started to yield results. 
Komisija in ESZD menita, da so upravne reforme v Afriški uniji začele prinašati rezultate.
The Commission has provided support to the AU Commission reforms through the contracting of dedicated technical assistance to strengthen accountancy, internal audit, procurement and asset management among other areas through two specific contracts. 
Komisija je podprla reforme Komisije Afriške unije, in sicer s sklepanjem pogodb za namensko tehnično pomoč za okrepitev računovodstva, notranje revizije, javnih naročil in upravljanja sredstev na različnih področjih prek dveh posebnih pogodb.
For further details see reply to paragraph 23. 
Za podrobnejše informacije glej odgovor na odstavek 23.
Recommendation 1: Foster AU ownership of the APSA and refocus EU support The Commission and the EEAS accept the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 1: Spodbujanje lastništva Afriške unije v okviru Afriške strukture za mir in varnost ter ponovno osredotočenje podpore EU Komisija in ESZD sprejemata priporočilo.
However, ad hoc support to operational costs may still be appropriate under certain conditions. 
Vendar je lahko ad hoc podpora operativnih stroškov pod določenimi pogoji še vedno ustrezna.
Contracts were signed late mainly because of belated requests and insufficient adequate information from the Organisations implementing EU's aid. 
Pogodbe so bile podpisane pozno predvsem zaradi zamud pri prošnjah in nezadostnih ustreznih informacij organizacij, ki izvajajo pomoč EU.
Delays in contracting did not prevent the achievement of the main outputs in most of the cases. 
Zamude pri sklepanju pogodb v večini primerov niso preprečile doseganja glavnih rezultatov.
For example, the late signature of the second APSA Support Programme did not prevent the finalisation of the APSA Roadmap. 
Na primer, pozen podpis drugega programa podpore Afriške strukture za mir in varnost ni preprečil končne izvedbe časovnega načrta Afriške strukture za mir in varnost.
On the issue of monitoring, an overall external evaluation of the APF for the period 2014-2016 was carried out in 2017 (report published in March 2018). 
V zvezi s vprašanjem spremljanja je bila leta 2017 izvedena splošna zunanja ocena mirovne pomoči za Afriko za obdobje 2014–2016 (poročilo je bilo objavljeno marca 2018).
The Commission and the EEAS will take them into account for the drafting of the APF action programme 2019-2020. 
Komisija in ESZD jih bosta upoštevali pri pripravi osnutka akcijskega programa za mirovno pomoč za Afriko za obdobje 2019–2020.
When looking at the coherent use of financing instruments significant progress has already been made Đ especially when considering the complementarity between the APF and the RIPs (informal monitoring systems referred to in paragraphs 56 and 58, mutual consultation during quality support groups but also between the APF and the IcSP and ad hoc coordination referred to in paragraph 58). 7 
Pri dosledni uporabi finančnih instrumentov je bil že dosežen pomemben napredek, zlasti pri proučevanju dopolnjevanja mirovne pomoči za Afriko in regionalnega okvirnega programa (neformalni sistemi spremljanja iz odstavkov 56 in 58, medsebojno posvetovanje med skupinami za podporo kakovosti, pa tudi med mirovno pomočjo za Afriko in instrumentom za prispevanje k stabilnosti in miru ter ad hoc usklajevanjem iz odstavka 58).
Recommendation 2: Interventions should be consistently results-based The Commission accepts this recommendation. 8 
Priporočilo 2: Intervencije morajo dosledno temeljiti na rezultatih. Komisija sprejema to priporočilo. 8
Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 24.1.2017 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 27.4.2018 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 26.6.2018 CommissionŐs (or other auditeeŐs) official replies received in all languages 18.7.2018 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-0338-8 doi:10.2865/466192 QJ-AB-18-016-EN-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-0378-4 doi:10.2865/31039 QJ-AB-18-016-EN-Q 
Dogodek Datum Sprejetje revizijskega memoranduma / začetek revizije 24.1.2017 Osnutek poročila uradno poslan Komisiji (ali drugemu revidirancu) 27.4.2018 Sprejetje končnega poročila po razčiščevalnem postopku 26.6.2018 Prejeti uradni odgovori Komisije (ali drugega revidiranca) v vseh jezikih 18.7.2018 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-0364-7 doi:10.2865/07946 QJ-AB-18-016-SL-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-0344-9 doi:10.2865/13241 QJ-AB-18-016-SL-Q
The member states of the African Union established the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) in 2002 as a long-term structural response to the peace and security challenges on the African continent. 
Države članice Afriške unije so leta 2002 ustanovile Afriško strukturo za mir in varnost (APSA) kot dolgoročni strukturni odziv na izzive na področju miru in varnosti na afriški celini.
Through the APSA, the African Union and mandated sub-regional organisations have access to tools which help them to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts. 
V njenem okviru imajo Afriška unija in pooblaščene podregionalne organizacije dostop do orodij, ki jim pomagajo pri preprečevanju, upravljanju in reševanju konfliktov.
We examined the EUŐs support for the development of the APSA, concluding that the support has had a poor effect and needed refocusing. 
Sodišče je preučilo podporo EU za razvoj Afriške strukture za mir in varnost in ugotovilo, da je imela podpora majhen učinek in jo je treba preusmeriti.
The APSA has been for many years heavily dependent on donor funding and the EU support had been focused on contributing to APSAŐs basic operational costs. 
Afriška struktura za mir in varnost je že več let močno odvisna od podpore donatorjev, podpora EU pa je osredotočena na prispevanje h kritju njenih osnovnih operativnih stroškov.
EN 2018 Special Report NO 22 Mobility under Erasmus+: Millions of participants and multi-faceted European Added Value, however performance measurement needs to be further improved (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
SL 2018 Posebno poročilo št. 22 Mobilnost v okviru programa Erasmus+: milijoni izmenjav in večplastna evropska dodana vrednost, toda merjenje smotrnosti je treba še izboljšati (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
AUDIT TEAM The ECA’s special reports set out the results of its audits of EU policies and programmes, or of management-related topics from specific budgetary areas. 
REVIZIJSKA EKIPA Posebna poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča predstavljajo rezultate njegovih revizij politik in programov EU ali tém v zvezi z upravljanjem na posameznih področjih proračuna.
This performance audit was carried out by Audit Chamber IV Regulation of markets and competitive economy, headed by ECA Member Neven Mates. 
To revizijo smotrnosti je opravil revizijski senat IV – regulacija trgov in konkurenčno gospodarstvo, ki ga vodi član Evropskega računskega sodišča Neven Mates.
The audit was led by ECA Member Rimantas Šadžius, supported by Mindaugas Pakštys, Head of Lithuanian Private Office, Tomas Mackevičius, Private Office Attaché, as well as Aušra Maziukaitė and Niamh Carey, Private Office Assistants; Paul Stafford, Principal Manager; Maria Echanove, Head of Task; Sandra Dreimane, Agnieszka Plebanowicz, Bogdan Sinca and Timothy Upton, Auditors. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Rimantas Šadžius, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njegovega kabineta Mindaugas Pakštys, ataše v njegovem kabinetu Tomas Mackevičius ter asistenta v njegovem kabinetu Aušra Maziukaitė in Niamh Carey, vodilni upravni uslužbenec Paul Stafford, vodja naloge Maria Echanove ter revizorji Sandra Dreimane, Agnieszka Plebanowicz, Bogdan Sinca in Timothy Upton.
Linguistic support was provided by Michael Pyper. 
Jezikovno podporo je zagotovila Michael Pyper.
From left to right: Niamh Carey, Rimantas Šadžius, Mindaugas Pakštys, Maria Echanove, Tomas Mackevičius, Paul Stafford, Aušra Maziukaitė. 
Od leve proti desni: Niamh Carey, Rimantas Šadžius, Mindaugas Pakštys, Maria Echanove, Tomas Mackevičius, Paul Stafford, Aušra Maziukaitė.
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 5 AWP DCI DG EAC EAV EIF ESF HE KA LA MTE NA OLS SE VET Annual Work Programme Development Cooperation Instrument The Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture at the European Commission is the executive branch of the European Union responsible for policy on education, culture, youth, languages and sport. 
KRATICE IN OKRAJŠAVE GD EAC Generalni direktorat za izobraževanje, mladino, šport in kulturo pri Evropski komisiji je izvršilna veja Evropske unije, pristojna za politiko na področju izobraževanja, kulture, mladih, jezikov in športa.
GLOSSARY Comenius: Previous mobility programme for schools. 
GLOSAR Comenius: prejšnji program mobilnosti za šole.
Dashboard: data warehouse in the Commission, collecting all the Erasmus+ information that is recorded by the National Agencies and the beneficiaries. 
Erasmus dashboard: podatkovno skladišče v Komisiji, v katerem se zbirajo vsi podatki v zvezi s programom Erasmus+, ki jih vnašajo nacionalne agencije in upravičenci.
The data is updated on a daily basis and provides real-time, qualitative and quantitative data relating to the implementation of the Programme. 
Podatki se posodabljajo vsak dan, tako da so na voljo kvalitativni in kvantitativni podatki v realnem času, ki so povezani z izvajanjem programa.
Erasmus: Previous mobility programme for Higher Education. 
Erasmus: prejšnji program mobilnosti za visoko šolstvo.
Europass: Portfolio of five documents helping citizens to better communicate their skills and qualifications when applying for a job or to study in Europe. 
Europass: mapa petih dokumentov, ki državljanom pomagajo, da pri vlogah za zaposlitev ali študij v Evropi lažje prikažejo svoje kvalifikacije.
These documents are the Europass CV and the Language Passport and three documents that can be issued to citizens who achieve a mobility experience in another European country (Europass Mobility) or who complete a formal programme of vocational education or training (Certificate supplement) or of higher education (Diploma supplement). 
Ti dokumenti so življenjepis v formatu Europass, jezikovna izkaznica Europass in trije dokumenti, ki se lahko izdajo državljanom, ki so bili na izmenjavi v drugi evropski državi (potrdilo Europass mobilnost) ali ki zaključijo formalen program poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja (priloga k spričevalu) ali visokošolskega študija (priloga k diplomi).
ET 2020: Education and Training 2020 is the EU-wide framework for cooperation in education and training adopted in the Council conclusions of 12 May 2009. 
Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2020: okvir za sodelovanje v izobraževanju in usposabljanju za celo EU, sprejet s sklepi Sveta 12. maja 2009.
Leonardo da Vinci: Previous mobility programme for Vocational Education and Training. 
Leonardo da Vinci: prejšnji program mobilnosti za poklicno izobraževanje in usposabljanje.
Mobility Benchmark: the indicator pertaining to Erasmus+ which is one of the targets set under ET 2020. 6 
Referenčno merilo za mobilnost: kazalnik za Erasmus+, ki je eden od ožjih ciljev, določenih v okviru Izobraževanja in usposabljanja 2020. 6
7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY About Erasmus+ I. Erasmus+ (“the Programme”) is an EU programme supporting actions in the fields of education and training, youth and sport with a total budget of €16.45 billion for the period 2014-2020. 
7 POVZETEK O programu Erasmus+ I. Erasmus+ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: program) je program EU za podpiranje ukrepov na področjih izobraževanja in usposabljanja, mladih in športa.
Its aim is to provide learners and staff with the opportunity to gain skills and undergo personal, socio-educational and professional development through study, training, work experience or volunteering abroad. 
Cilj programa je zagotoviti učečim se in zaposlenim možnosti za usvajanje spretnosti ter za osebnostni, družbeno-izobraževalni in strokovni razvoj s študijem, usposabljanjem, delovnimi izkušnjami in prostovoljnim delom v tujini.
It also aims to improve quality and foster innovation, excellence and internationalisation in organisations working in these three fields. 
Poleg tega je namenjen izboljšanju kakovosti in krepitvi inovativnosti, odličnosti in internacionalizacije v organizacijah na teh treh področjih.
A higher level objective of Erasmus+ is to help European countries to modernise and improve their education and training systems, reinforcing their role as drivers for growth, employment, competitiveness, innovation and social cohesion. 
Cilj programa Erasmus+ na visoki ravni je pomagati evropskim državam, da bodo posodobile in izboljšale svoje sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja tako, da bodo okrepile njihovo vlogo, ki jo imajo kot gonilo rasti, zaposlovanja, konkurenčnosti, inovativnosti in socialne kohezije.
Erasmus+ covers Higher Education (HE), Vocational Education and Training (VET), School Education (SE), Adult Education, Youth and Sport. 
Erasmus+ vključuje visoko šolstvo, poklicno izobraževanje in usposabljanje, izobraževanje v šolah, izobraževanje odraslih, mlade in šport.
The activities and projects that can be funded under Erasmus+ are distributed between Key Actions (KA). 
Dejavnosti in projekti, ki se lahko financirajo v okviru programa Erasmus+, so uvrščeni v ključne ukrepe.
The Programme is mostly (80 %) implemented under indirect management by National Agencies (NA). 
Program v glavnem (80 %) izvajajo nacionalne agencije po načelu posrednega upravljanja.
What we audited IV. 
Kaj je Sodišče revidiralo IV.
We assessed the performance and European Added Value (EAV) of the Programme, focusing on KA1, Learning Mobility of individuals (“Erasmus+ Mobility” or “Mobility”) as regards Education and Training, which represents more than half of the Programme’s budget allocation for the period 2014-2020. 
Sodišče je ocenilo smotrnost in evropsko dodano vrednost programa za izobraževanje in usposabljanje, pri čemer se je osredotočilo na ključni ukrep 1 – učna mobilnost posameznikov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: mobilnost Erasmus+ ali mobilnost), za katerega je namenjena več kot polovica proračuna programa za obdobje 2014–2020.
By January 2018 more than 2.3 million learners and practitioners had benefitted from such mobility. 
Do januarja 2028 je več kot 2,3 milijona učečih se in strokovnjakov iz prakse izkoristilo tovrstno mobilnost.
What we found V. Our overall conclusion is that Erasmus+ is a well-known, successful EU brand. 
Kaj je Sodišče ugotovilo V. Splošni zaključek Sodišča je, da je Erasmus+ dobro znana in uspešna znamka EU.
Erasmus+ plays a key role in building up learning mobility abroad and has a positive effect on participants’ attitudes towards the EU. 
Erasmus+ ima ključno vlogo pri omogočanju učne mobilnosti v tujini in pozitivno vpliva na odnos udeležencev do EU.
In particular, we found that: (a) Erasmus+ Mobility provides EAV in many ways in addition to those required in the legal basis, such as a strategic approach to mobility, an increase in sense of European identity and multilingualism; (b) most of the targets for the indicators set in the legal basis are being met. However, these indicators are not fully aligned with the general and specific objectives set out in the Regulation making performance measurement difficult. 
Sodišče je zlasti ugotovilo, da: (a) mobilnost v okviru programa Erasmus+ prinaša evropsko dodano vrednost še na veliko načinov poleg tistih, ki so zahtevani v pravni podlagi, na primer s strateškim pristopom k mobilnosti, povečanjem zavesti o evropski identiteti in večjezičnostjo; (b) se dosega večina ciljnih vrednosti za kazalnike iz pravne podlage, vendar ti kazalniki niso povsem skladni s splošnimi in posebnimi cilji, opredeljenimi v Uredbi, zaradi česar je težko meriti smotrnost.
The qualitative indicators are largely based on perceptions of participants via interviews and surveys; (c) Erasmus+ introduces many innovations towards administrative simplification for Mobility, although application and reporting processes are still complex; (d) the innovative Student Loan Guarantee Facility has not produced the expected results leading to the Commission reallocating the relevant funds. 
Količinsko opredeljeni kazalniki v veliki meri temeljijo na mnenjih udeležencev, izraženih v intervjujih in anketah; (c) Erasmus+ uvaja veliko inovacij za administrativno poenostavitev mobilnosti, čeprav sta procesa prijavljanja in poročanja še vedno kompleksna; (d) inovativna jamstvena shema za študentska posojila ni prinesla pričakovanih rezultatov, zato je Komisija prerazporedila del sredstev.
What we recommend VII. 
Kaj Sodišče priporoča VII.
We recommend that the Commission should in particular: (a) suggest additional EAV elements when designing and implementing the future Erasmus programme. 
Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija zlasti: (a) pri snovanju in izvajanju prihodnjega programa Erasmus predlaga dodatne elemente evropske dodane vrednosti.
All EAV elements should be prioritised at the project appraisal stage, monitored and reported on; (b) further develop indicators that help to measure the extent to which the general and specific objectives of the Programme have been achieved, and prioritise performance in the allocation of funds; (c) further simplify the scheme in order to reduce the administrative burden, make applications and reporting easier for beneficiaries and individual participants and maintain lump sums, flat rates and unit costs, but adjust the grant amounts when necessary. 
Vsem tem elementom bi bilo treba v fazi ocenjevanja projektov dati prednost, nato pa jih spremljati in o njih poročati; (b) dodatno razvije kazalnike, ki bodo pomagali meriti, v kolikšni meri so bili doseženi splošni in posebni cilji programa, in pri dodeljevanju sredstev da prednost smotrnosti; (c) še poenostavi program, da se zmanjša upravno breme, olajša prijavljanje in poročanje za upravičence in udeležence posameznike ter ohrani financiranje na podlagi pavšalnih zneskov, pavšalnih stopenj in stroškov na enoto, vendar po potrebi prilagodi zneske nepovratnih sredstev.
It should also improve IT tools and continue to computerise procedures; (d) promote the introduction of school student mobility in KA1 and consider applying more flexibility for PhD students; 9 
Poleg tega bi morala izboljšati orodja IT in še naprej uvajati računalniško podprte postopke; 9
(e) assess the possibility of reintroducing the funding for traditional classroom language teaching; and (f) propose appropriate changes to the Student Loan Guarantee Facility to include doctoral and undergraduate mobility. 10 
(d) spodbuja vključitev mobilnosti šolarjev v ključni ukrep 1 in razmisli o večji fleksibilnosti za študente doktorskih programov; (e) oceni možnost za ponovno uvedbo financiranja tradicionalnega poučevanja jezikov v učilnicah; (f) predlaga ustrezne spremembe jamstvene sheme za študentska posojila, da bi vključevala mobilnost na dodiplomskem in doktorskem študiju. 10
Erasmus+ supports actions in the fields of education and training, youth and sport, with a total budget of €16.45 billion for the period 2014-2020. 
Erasmus+ je program EU za podpiranje ukrepov na področjih izobraževanja in usposabljanja, mladih in športa. Skupni proračun programa za obdobje 2014–2020 znaša 16,45 milijarde EUR.
It aims to provide learners and staff with the opportunity to gain skills and undergo personal, socio-educational and professional development through study, training, work experience or volunteering abroad. 
Njegov cilj je zagotoviti učečim se in zaposlenim možnosti za usvajanje spretnosti ter za osebnostni, družbeno-izobraževalni in strokovni razvoj z študijem, usposabljanjem, delovnimi izkušnjami in prostovoljnim delom v tujini.
The Programme also aims to improve quality and foster innovation, excellence and internationalisation of organisations in these three fields. 
Poleg tega je namenjen izboljšanju kakovosti in krepitvi inovativnosti, odličnosti in internacionalizacije v organizacijah na teh treh področjih.
The objective of Erasmus+ is also to help European countries to modernise and improve their education and training systems, reinforcing their role as drivers for growth, employment, competitiveness, innovation and social cohesion. 
Cilj programa Erasmus+ na visoki ravni je tudi pomagati evropskim državam, da bodo posodobile in izboljšale svoje sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja tako, da bodo okrepile njihovo vlogo, ki jo imajo kot gonilo rasti, zaposlovanja, konkurenčnosti, inovativnosti in socialne kohezije.
According to its establishing regulation1 (henceforth “the Regulation”) the Programme shall contribute inter alia to the achievement of the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy2, including the headline education target. 
Glede na uredbo1 o uvedbi programa (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba) naj bi program med drugim prispeval k uresničitvi ciljev strategije Evropa 20202, vključno s krovnim ciljem izobraževanja.
It shall also contribute to the objectives of the strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training, including the corresponding benchmarks (“ET 2020”)3. 
Prispeval naj bi tudi k uresničevanju ciljev strateškega okvira za evropsko sodelovanje v izobraževanju in usposabljanju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ET 2020)3, vključno z ustreznimi referenčnimi merili.