natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We also examined the set-up of the performance framework for 35 priority axes of the 14 OPs covered. 
Sodišče je preučilo tudi strukturo okvira smotrnosti poslovanja za 35 prednostnih osi 14 zajetih operativnih programov.
We found the milestones and targets for the performance indicators to be consistent with the nature and character of the specific objectives of the priority axis and, in the vast majority of cases, relevant and measuring a significant part of the actions developed under a given priority axis (i.e. representing more than half of the financial allocation of the priority axis). 
Ugotovilo je, da so mejniki in ciljne vrednosti kazalnikov smotrnosti poslovanja skladni z vrsto in značilnostmi specifičnih ciljev prednostne osi in v veliki večini primerov relevantni ter da merijo pomemben del ukrepov, razvitih v okviru dane prednostne osi (tj. predstavljajo več kot polovico finančnih sredstev, dodeljenih prednostni osi).
Ourfindingsaremoremixedasregardsthetargetvaluesset.Ingeneral,managing authorities justified them by reference to past or existing interventions or, whenever empirical values were not available, on the basis of estimates. 
UgotovitveSodiščavzvezizdoločenimiciljnimivrednostmipasomešane.Organi upravljanja so jih na splošno utemeljili z navedbami preteklih ali sedanjih intervencij ali, kadar empirične vrednosti niso bile na voljo, na podlagi ocen.
For around one quarter of the indicators in the performance framework of the audited OPs (28 %) we were not able to conclude on the accuracy of the value, either because the calculation methodology could not be verified or because there was no detailed explanation on the unit costs or the assumptions made. 
Sodišče za približno četrtino kazalnikov v okviru smotrnosti poslovanja revidiranih operativnih programov (28 %) ni moglo ugotoviti, ali je vrednost točna, bodisi ker ni bilo mogoče preveriti metodologije izračuna bodisi ker ni bilo podrobne razlage o stroških na enoto ali uporabljenih predpostavkah.
We also consider that 18 % of the remaining milestones and target values are not realistic and/or achievable as they were either incorrectly calculated or considered to be underestimated (see Annex III). 
Sodišče meni še, da 18 % preostalih mejnikov in ciljnih vrednosti ni realističnih in/ali dosegljivih, saj so bili bodisi nepravilno izračunani bodisi prepoznani kot podcenjeni (glej Prilogo III).
An example of unsubstantiated assumptions is presented in Box 4. 
Primer neutemeljenih predpostavk je predstavljen v okviru 4.
41 Box 4 - Example of values that could not be verified for the two Spanish OPs; ‘Smart Growth’ and ‘Andalucia ERDF’. For two Spanish ERDF OPs examined, the targets and milestones set for performance frameworks related to thematic objective 1 could not be confirmed. 
42 Okvir 4 – Primer vrednosti, ki jih ni bilo mogoče preveriti za dva španska operativna programa: „Pametna rast” in „Andaluzija ESRR” Pri dveh preučenih španskih operativnih programih ESRR ni bilo mogoče potrditi ciljnih vrednosti in mejnikov, določenih za okvire za smotrnost poslovanja, ki se nanašajo na tematski cilj 1.
The Spanish authorities disclosed the methodology used to estimate the values, but did not provide data that would allow verification of the values set in the adopted OPs. 
Španski organi so razkrili metodologijo, ki so jo uporabili za ocenjevanje vrednosti, vendar niso predložili podatkov, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče preveriti vrednosti, določene v sprejetih operativnih programih.
A similar problem was raised in the respective OP ex-ante evaluation reports stating that more information would have been needed to validate the performance framework46. 80. 
Podoben problem je bil opisan v poročilih o predhodnem vrednotenju za omenjena operativna programa, v katerih je bilo navedeno, da bi bilo za potrditev okvira za smotrnost poslovanja potrebnih več informacij.46 80.
Taken together this means that in around 46 % of the 128 examined cases doubts remain as to the milestones and/or targets specified for releasing the performance reserve are realistic and achievable (see Annex III). 
To skupaj pomeni, da v približno 46 % od 128 preučenih primerov ostajajo dvomi glede tega, ali so mejniki in/ali ciljne vrednosti, določeni za sprostitev rezerve za smotrnost poslovanja, realni in dosegljivi (glej Prilogo III).
The performance reserve can be definitively allocated even if milestone values are not met in full by 2018 81. 
Rezerva za smotrnost poslovanja se lahko dokončno dodeli, tudi če vrednosti mejnikov ne bodo v celoti dosežene do leta 2018 81.
The performance reserve can only be definitively allocated upon the achievement of the milestones specified in the OPs performance framework47. 
Rezerva za smotrnost poslovanja se lahko dokončno dodeli šele, ko so doseženi mejniki, določeni v okviru smotrnosti poslovanja operativnih programov47.
For all 14 OPs examined, there were at least two milestones specified. 
Vseh 14 preučenih operativnih programov je imelo določena najmanj dva mejnika.
We noted however that the performance reserve can also be definitively allocated even though milestone values are not fully achieved by December 2018. 
Sodišče pa je ugotovilo, da se rezerva za smotrnost poslovanja lahko dokončno dodeli tudi, če vrednosti mejnikov ne bodo v celoti dosežene do decembra 2018.
In case there are - two indicators, milestones are considered achieved48 if both indicators achieved at least 85 % of their milestone value; and - more than two indicators, one of the indicators is allowed to achieve only 75 % of its milestone value, whereas the remaining ones need to achieve 85 %. 
Če - sta kazalnika dva, šteje, da so mejniki doseženi48, če sta oba kazalnika dosegla vsaj 85 % vrednosti mejnika, in 46 47 48 Stran 205 poročila o predhodnem vrednotenju za operativni program „Pametna rast” in stran 93 poročila o predhodnem vrednotenju za operativni program „Andaluzija ESRR”.
This is the case for 60 % of the priority axis with performance frameworks. 
To velja za več kot 60 % prednostnih osi z okviri smotrnosti poslovanja.
Performance review can at most result in a reallocation within the Member State 83. 
Najhujša posledica pregleda smotrnosti poslovanja je lahko predodelitev znotraj države članice 83.
If the indicators do not achieve these minimum milestone values, the performance review will result in a reallocation of the performance reserve to the priorities that achieved their milestone values and/or, in the case of a serious failure to reach the milestone values, it may lead to a suspension of payments. 
Če kazalniki ne dosežejo teh najmanjših vrednosti mejnikov, se rezerva za smotrnost poslovanja po pregledu smotrnosti predodeli prioritetam, ki so dosegle vrednosti svojih mejnikov, in/ali plačila se lahko v primeru resnega neuspeha pri doseganju vrednosti mejnikov začasno ustavijo.
Annex IV gives an overview of the detailed rules applicable to the assessment of milestones and targets. 
V Prilogi IV je pregled podrobnih pravil, ki veljajo za ocenjevanje mejnikov in ciljnih vrednosti.
Reallocation of the performance reserve is performed at national level: funds can be reallocated to priority axes within an OP or can be reallocated to priority axes of other OPs of the Member State. 
Predodelitev rezerve za smotrnost poslovanja se opravi na nacionalni ravni: sredstva se lahko predodelijo prednostnim osem znotraj operativnega programa ali prednostnim osem drugih operativnih programov te države članice.
There is therefore no risk for a Member States to lose EU funding. 
Zato države članice ne tvegajo izgube finančnih sredstev EU.
43 previous reports, we already stated that it is a challenge to obtain good qualitative results from schemes where funds are pre-allocated among Member States49. 
Sodišče je že v prejšnjih poročilih navedlo, da je izziv pridobiti dobre kvalitativne rezultate s shemami, pri katerih so sredstva vnaprej razdeljena med državami članicami49.
Subject to the approval of the Commission, Member States also have the flexibility to decide how a reallocation will be performed: for example Poland stated in its PA that the performance reserve of around 5 billion euro will be reallocated based on a national competition between OPs (see Box 5). 
Države članice imajo ob odobritvi Komisije tudi možnost, da se odločijo, kako bodo izvedle predodelitev: Poljska je na primer v svoje partnerskem sporazumu navedla, da bo rezervo za smotrnost v višini približno 5 milijard EUR predodelila na podlagi nacionalne konkurence med operativnimi programi (glej okvir 5).
Box 5 - Reallocation of performance reserve funds – example of Poland’s competitive system If priorities do not achieve their milestones, the Polish performance reserve funds will be aggregated in a national pool of funds to be reallocated to performing priorities as long as they fulfil the following criteria: i) comply with the restrictions set out in the relevant EU regulations (e.g. thematic concentration requirements50) and ii) the increase allocation of funds is justified based on reports/ evaluations concerning the implementation, changes to the socio-economic situation and administrative and absorption capacity. 
44 Okvir 5 – Predodelitev sredstev iz rezerve za smotrnost poslovanja – primer poljskega konkurenčnega sistema Če prioritete ne bodo dosegle svojih mejnikov, bodo sredstva iz poljske rezerve za smotrnost poslovanja združena v nacionalni sklad sredstev, ki bodo predodeljena prioritetam, ki se izvajajo smotrno, če bodo te izpolnjevale naslednja merila: i) skladnost z omejitvami, določenimi v ustreznih uredbah EU (npr. zahteve za tematsko osredotočenost50) in ii) povečana dodelitev sredstev je upravičena na podlagi poročil/ocen o izvajanju, spremembah socialno-ekonomskih razmer ter upravni zmogljivosti in sposobnosti črpanja.
The reallocation of the funds is not restricted to priorities of the same OP, but can done between priorities of different OPs, as long as the priorities fulfil the both sets of criteria. 
Predodelitev sredstev ni omejena na prioritete istega operativnega programa, temveč se lahko izvede med prioritetami različnih operativnih programov, če prioritete izpolnjujejo oba sklopa meril.
However, the possibility to leave the allocations for a given programme will be considered first. 
Vendar bo najprej preučena možnost, da se sredstva pustijo določenemu programu.
Suspensions and financial corrections for underperformance subject to restrictive conditions Payment suspensions during programme implementation 87. 
Začasne ustavitve plačil in finančni popravki za nezadostno smotrnost so omejeni s posebnimi pogoji Začasna ustavitev plačil med izvajanjem programa 87.
Suspensions can be imposed for cases of indicators included in the performance framework not achieving at least 65 % of their milestone values. 
Začasna ustavitev plačil se lahko naloži, kadar kazalniki, vključeni v okvir smotrnosti poslovanja, ne dosegajo niti 65 % vrednosti svojih mejnikov.
Moreover, the underperformance must result from clearly identified implementation weaknesses. 
Poleg tega mora nezadostna smotrnost izvirati iz jasno ugotovljenih slabosti izvajanja.
44 suspension should be lifted as soon as the Member State has taken the necessary corrective action51. 
Začasno ustavitev je treba prekiniti takoj, ko država članica sprejme potrebne popravljalne ukrepe51.
The Member State, in addition, has the possibility to review the value set for the milestone if there is a significant change in the economic, environmental and labour market conditions in a Member State or region52. 
Poleg tega ima država članica možnost, da spremeni vrednost, določeno za mejnik, če pride do znatne spremembe v gospodarskih in okoljskih razmerah ter razmerah na trgu dela v državi članici ali regiji52.
In a previous Special Report, we already found that Member States used this option during the 2007-2013 period to lower their target values towards the actual outcome shortly before closure53. 
45 države članice to možnost v obdobju 2007–2013 uporabile, da so malo pred zaključkom znižale svoje ciljne vrednosti in jih približale dejanskemu izidu53.
Financial corrections at closure 90. 
Finančni popravki ob zaključku 90.
At closure the Commission may also impose net financial corrections in case the indicators included in the performance framework have achieved less than 65 % of the target values set in the OPs for 2023. 
Komisija lahko ob zaključku naloži tudi neto finančne popravke, če so kazalniki iz okvira smotrnosti poslovanja dosegli manj kot 65 % ciljnih vrednosti, določenih v operativnih programih za leto 2023.
No financial correction can be imposed at closure, if the level of underperformance is above 65 %. 
Če je raven nezadostne smotrnosti višja od 65 %, ob zaključku ni mogoče naložiti finančnih popravkov.
Financial corrections can also not be applied for underperformance related to the results or if the failure to achieve targets is due to a set of external factors defined in the CPR such as socio-economic or environmental factors, significant changes in the economic or environmental conditions in the Member State concerned or because of reasons of “force majeure”55. 
Finančni popravki se ne smejo uporabljati niti za nezadostno smotrnost, povezano z rezultati, ali v primerih, v katerih ciljne vrednosti niso bile dosežene zaradi sklopa zunanjih dejavnikov, opredeljenih v uredbi o skupnih določbah, kot so socialno-ekonomski ali okoljski dejavniki, pomembne spremembe gospodarskih ali okoljskih razmer v zadevni državi članici ali višja sila55.
The external factors that are not specifically mentioned in the legislation should be analysed on a case-by-case basis and may lead to a reduction of up to 50 % in the level of 51 52 53 54 55 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, Article 142.1(f). 
Zunanje dejavnike, ki v zakonodaji niso izrecno navedeni, je treba analizirati za vsak primer posebej, privedejo pa lahko do največ 50-odstotnega znižanja ravni finančnih popravkov56.
To assess the level of impact of the external factors in question, evaluations will need to be performed. 
Za presojo raven vpliva zadevnih zunanjih dejavnikov, bo treba opraviti vrednotenja.
Furthermore, the application of financial corrections should take into account the principle of proportionality and the OP’s absorption level. 
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pri uporabi finančnih popravkov upoštevati načelo sorazmernosti in stopnjo črpanja operativnega programa.
For the former, the level of correction can be reduced, without a pre-defined limit, if the financial correction is considered disproportionate. 
Zaradi načela sorazmernosti se lahko raven popravka zniža brez vnaprej opredeljene omejitve, če finančni popravek velja za nesorazmernega.
For the latter, the legislation foresees that financial corrections will only be applied for priorities whose outputs achievement rate corresponds to less than two thirds of the target values. 
480/2014. uporabljajo samo za prioritete, katerih stopnja doseganja izložkov ustreza manj kot dvema tretjinama ciljnih vrednosti.
The level of the financial correction will be established based on the achievement/absorption coefficient (see Annex IV). 
Stopnja finančnega popravka se določi na podlagi koeficienta realizacije/absorpcije (glej Prilogo IV).
Regulatory conditions for corrective actions against underperformance are too restrictive 93. 
Regulativni pogoji za popravljalne ukrepe za nezadostno smotrnost so preveč omejujoči 93.
As already noted in a previous Special Report, during the 2014-2020 period, the Commission can for the first time impose payment suspensions and financial corrections for underperformance. 
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno že v enem od prejšnjih posebnih poročil, lahko Komisija v obdobju 2014–2020 prvič začasno ustavi plačila in naloži finančne popravke za nezadostno smotrnost poslovanja.
We consider this to be a first step in the right direction57. However, the regulatory conditions for invoking these preventive and corrective actions are too restrictive. 
Sodišče meni, da je to prvi korak v pravo smer57, vendar so regulativni pogoji za uporabo teh preventivnih in popravljalnih ukrepov preveč omejujoči.
This makes it highly unlikely that the Commission will ever be in a position to impose a payment suspension or a financial correction for underperformance during the 2014-2020 period. 
Zato je zelo malo verjetno, da bo Komisija v obdobju 2014–2020 lahko kdaj odredila začasno ustavitev plačil ali finančni popravek za nezadostno smotrnost.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Ex-ante conditionalities provided a consistent framework for assessing the Member States’ readiness to implement Cohesion policy, but it is unclear to what extent this has effectively led to changes on the ground 94. 
ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA S predhodnimi pogojenostmi je bil zagotovljen skladen okvir za ocenjevanje pripravljenosti držav članic za izvajanje kohezijske politike, vendar ni jasno, koliko je to dejansko privedlo do sprememb na terenu 94.
Ex-ante Conditionalities require a Member State to meet certain conditions before programme implementation is launched or at the latest by the end of 2016. 
S predhodnimi pogojenostmi se zahteva, da država članica izpolni nekatere pogoje, preden se začne izvajanje programov ali najkasneje do konca leta 2016.
This is a positive innovation in Cohesion policy. 
To je pozitivna inovacija v kohezijski politiki.
Member States considered at the adoption of the OPs that almost two thirds (65 %) of the thematic ex-ante conditionalities are fulfilled. There were however significant differences between Member States and EACs. 
Države članice so ob sprejetju operativnih programov menile, da sta skoraj dve tretjini (65 %) tematskih predhodnih pogojenosti izpolnjeni, vendar so bile med državami članicami in predhodnimi pogojenostmi pomembne razlike.
For example, 8 out of the 29 thematic EACs were fulfilled in less than half of the Member States and four in less than a quarter of them. 
Osem od 29 tematskih predhodnih pogojenosti je bilo na primer izpolnjenih v manj kot polovici držav članic, štiri pa v manj kot četrtini držav.
There was also slow progress in completing the action plans adopted by Member States for unfulfilled ex-ante conditionalities with 380 of the 761 action plans (50 %) not yet having been completed as of February 2017 based on Commission monitoring data. 
Tudi pri izvedbi akcijskih načrtov, ki so jih države članice sprejele za neizpolnjene predhodne pogojenosti, je bil napredek počasen, saj glede na podatke Komisije o spremljanju 380 od 761 akcijskih načrtov (50 %) do februarja 2017 še ni bilo izvedenih.
This decreased to 8 % according to the Commission’s monitoring data following the receipt of the annual implementation reports and progress reports in respectively June and August 2017. 
Po podatkih Komisije o spremljanju na podlagi letnih poročil o izvajanju in poročil o napredku, ki jih je prejela junija oziroma avgusta 2017, se je ta številka znižala na 8 %.
Only three Member States had completed all their action plans (Finland, Latvia and Lithuania) as of February 2017. 
Do februarja 2017 so samo tri države članice izvedle vse svoje akcijske načrte (Finska, Latvija in Litva).
At the same time there were ten Member States (Bulgaria, Spain, Greece, Croatia, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia, Ireland, Sweden and Luxembourg) which had completed less than half of their action plans. 
Deset držav članic (Bolgarija, Španija, Grčija, Hrvaška, Madžarska, Italija, Slovaška, Irska, Švedska in Luksemburg) pa je izvedlo manj kot polovico svojih akcijskih načrtov.
The slowest progress towards fulfilment of all the related action plans was made for the ex-ante conditionalities addressing non-compliance with EU and national rules in public procurement and state aid which are two of the main sources for irregularities in Cohesion policy. 
Napredek je bil najpočasnejši pri izpolnjevanju vseh akcijskih načrtov v zvezi s predhodnima pogojenostma, ki obravnavata neskladnost s pravili EU in nacionalnimi pravili o javnem naročanju ter državni pomoči; to sta dva od glavnih virov nepravilnosti v kohezijski politiki.
On the positive side, we estimate that the share of Cohesion spending which is affected by non-fulfilled thematic ex-ante conditionalities had come down from at most 57 % to at most 27 % As of mid-September 2017, according to the Commission 11 Member States (Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, Slovenia and Slovakia) had completed all their action plans. 
Pozitivno je, da se je po ocenah Sodišča delež porabe na področju kohezije, na katerega vplivajo neizpolnjene tematske predhodne pogojenosti zmanjšal z največ 57 % na največ 27 %. Po podatkih Komisije je do sredine septembra 2017 vse svoje akcijske načrte zaključilo 11 držav članic (Belgija, Češka, Estonija, Finska, Latvija, Litva, Nizozemska, Portugalska, Švedska, Slovenija in Slovaška).
The Commission, when assessing the ex-ante conditionalities, did not fully take account of the knowledge generated in other contexts, such as the European Semester, information 46 gathered by its Directorates-General or through its own monitoring activities. 
Komisija pri presoji predhodnih pogojenosti ni v celoti upoštevala vedenja, pridobljenega v drugih okvirih, kot je evropski semester, in informacij, ki jih zberejo njeni generalni direktorati ali sama z lastnimi dejavnostmi spremljanja.
We found several examples of inconsistent assessments which may also indicate a lack of rigour when validating the Member States’ self-assessment, which was often overly positive and inconsistent. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo več primerov nedoslednih ocen, ki lahko kažejo na premajhno strogost pri potrjevanju samoocen držav članic, saj so bile te pogosto preveč pozitivne in nedosledne.
Part of the problem is that the criteria specified in the CPR to assess whether ex-ante conditionalities are fulfilled are very often of a generic nature and thus leave considerable room for interpretation. 
Del tega problema je to, da so merila, opredeljena v uredbi o skupnih določbah, za presojo, ali so predhodne pogojenosti izpolnjene, pogosto splošna in zato dopuščajo precej različne razlage.
In particular, they often do not refer to specific quantifiable targets even where such targets could have been derived from existing EU legislation. 
Zlasti se pogosto ne nanašajo na specifične količinsko opredeljive ciljne vrednosti, niti takrat, ko bi takšne ciljne vrednosti lahko določili na podlagi obstoječe zakonodaje EU.
The Commission did not suspend all or part of interim payments although some Member States failed to fulfil the applicable ex-ante conditionalities. 
Komisija ni začasno ustavila vseh vmesnih plačil ali njihovega dela, čeprav nekatere države članice niso izpolnile relevantnih predhodnih pogojenosti.
13 Member States imposed self-suspensions related to selected investment priorities for 78 OPs and corresponding to around 2.3 billion euro of ESF funding. and around 4.7 billion euro of ERDF and CF funding. 
13 držav članic si je naložilo začasno samoustavitev plačil v zvezi z izbranimi prioritetami iz 78 operativnih programov, kar ustreza približno 2,3 milijarde EUR sredstev ESS in približno 4,7 milijarde EUR sredstev ESRR in Kohezijskega sklada.
At the same time, a large number of action plans had not been assessed as completed and many ex-ante conditionalities had not been fulfilled by February 2017. 
Istočasno pa do februarja 2017 veliko akcijskih načrtov ni bilo 47 ocenjenih kot izvedenih in številne predhodne pogojenosti niso bile izpolnjene.
Member States needed to submit their progress and implementation reports on the status of ex-ante conditionalities by mid-2017. 
Države članice so morale poročila o napredku in izvajanju v zvezi s stanjem predhodnih pogojenosti oddati do sredine leta 2017.
Based on these reports the Commission may impose suspensions of payments, but has not yet done so. 
Na podlagi teh poročil lahko Komisija začasno zaustavi plačila, vendar tega še ni storila.
In general the visited Member States perceived the ex-ante conditionalities as a useful tool for self-assessment. 
Na splošno so države članice predhodne pogojenosti razumele kot koristno orodje za samooceno.