natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This decision was based on a thorough analysis of all additional elements available at the time and on a simulation of the expected residual error rate development taking into account the remaining ongoing FP6 audits and the ongoing extrapolation exercises. 
Ta odločitev temelji na temeljiti analizi vseh dodatnih elementov, ki so bili takrat na voljo, in simulaciji pričakovanega razvoja stopnje preostalih napak ob upoštevanju preostalih tekočih revizij iz 6.
On 30 June 2011, the update of the simu­ lation based on the latest data available confirmed that the residual error rate in line with expectations has been reduced to 2,1 %. 
Posodobitev simulacije z dne 30. junija 2011, ki je temeljila na najnovejših razpoložljivih podatkih, je potrdila, da se je skladno s pričakovanji stopnja preostalih napak zmanjšala na 2,1 %.
This error rate should drop below 2 % by the end of the year, as projected previously. 
Po napo­ vedih naj bi ta stopnja napak do konca leta padla pod 2 %.
Furthermore, if the real financial impact of the audit findings (errors which require financial follow-up) is taken into account, the residual error rate equals 1,6%, well below the materiality level of 2 %. 
Poleg tega, če se upošteva dejanski finančni učinek ugotovitev revizij (napake, ki zahtevajo finančno spremljanje), stopnja preostalih napak znaša 1,6 %, kar je precej pod pragom pomembnosti, ki znaša 2 %.
As already highlighted in the Commission's answer to paragraph 6.32, the Commission's residual error rate calculation is reliable. 
Kot je bilo že poudarjeno v odgovoru Komisije na odstavek 6.32, je način, ki ga Komisija uporablja za izračunavanje stopnje preostalih napak, zanesljiv.
The reliability of the underlying data has been verified on the basis of a substantial number of follow-up audits. 
Zanesljivost osnovnih podatkov je bila preverjena s številnimi naknadnimi revizijami.
Taking into account the above-mentioned considerations, there was therefore no need for DG INFSO to maintain a reservation on FP6 expenditure. 
Glede na navedene razmisleke ni bilo potrebno, da GD INFSO ohrani pridržek v zvezi z odhodki iz 6. OP.
10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 183 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions 6.48. Based on its audit work, the Court concludes that the payments for the year ended 31 December 2010 for Research and other Internal Policies were free from material error (23). 
10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 183 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA Zaključki 6.48 Sodišče je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela prišlo do zaključka, da pri plačilih za raziskave in druge notranje politike za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2010, ni bilo pomembnih napak (23).
However, interim and final payments for the research FPs were subject to material error. 6.49. 
Vendar so bile pri vmesnih in končnih plačilih za okvirne programe za raziskave pomembne napake.
Based on its audit work, the Court concludes that the supervisory and control systems for Research and other Internal Policies were partially effective in ensuring the regu­ larity of payments. Recommendations 6.50. 
6.49 Sodišče je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela prišlo do zaključka, da so bili nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za razi­ skave in druge notranje politike pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti plačil delno uspešni.
Annex 6.4 shows the result of the Court’s review of progress in addressing recommendations made in previous annual reports (2008 to 2009). 6.51. 
Priporočila 6.50 V Prilogi 6.4 so prikazani rezultati pregleda, ki ga je Sodišče izvedlo v zvezi z napredkom pri izvajanju priporočil iz prejšnjih letnih poročil (2008 do 2009).
Following this review and the findings and conclusions for 2010, the Court recommends that the Commission should: — in the area of the research FPs: (i) draw on the lessons learnt from the good practice of DG INFSO’s risk-based ex-post auditing method to further enhance the Commission’s ex-ante controls with the aim of identifying payments with a relatively high-risk profile, and (ii) with the aim to further increase the reliability of the audit certificates, intensify its actions to raise the independent auditors’ awareness of the eligibility of expenditure rules, notably by actively informing the auditors about instances of failure to identify ineligible costs, — in the area of the LLP, continue to give emphasis to the implementation of primary controls. 
6.51 Sodišče glede na ta pregled ter ugotovitve in zaključke za leto 2010 Komisiji priporoča, naj: — na področju okvirnih programov za raziskave: (i) uporabi izkušnje, pridobljene pri dobri praksi metode GD INFSO za naknadne revizije na podlagi tveganja, za nadaljnje izbolj­ šanje svojih predhodnih kontrol za ugotavljanje plačil z relativno visokim tveganjem in (ii) za še večjo zanesljivost revizijskih potrdil okrepi svoje dejavnosti za osveščanje neodvisnih revizorjev o pravilih za upravičenost odhodkov, predvsem z aktivnim obveščanjem revizorjev o primerih, ko niso uspeli prepoznati neupravičenih stroškov, — pri programu Vseživljenjsko učenje še naprej poudarja izvajanje primarnih kontrol.
In particular attention should be given to ensuring that National Agencies check at least the minimum number of files required by the Commission and that all checks are properly documented. 
Zlasti bi bilo treba posvetiti pozornost temu, da bi nacionalne agencije preverile vsaj minimalno število dosjejev, ki ga zahteva Komisija, in da bi bili vsi pregledi pravilno dokumentirani.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 6.48. The Commission notes that payments in 2010 in the policy group Research and other Internal Policies were free from material error. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 6.48 Komisija ugotavlja, da so bila plačila v letu 2010 v skupini politik za raziskave in druge notranje politike brez pomembnih napak.
It is continuing to improve the operation of its multiannual control architecture in order to reduce the errors in interim and final payments. _____________ (23) See paragraphs 6.12 and 6.13. 
Še naprej bo izboljševala delovanje svojega sistema za večletni nadzor, da bi tako čim bolj zmanjšala napake pri vmesnih in končnih plačilih. _____________ (23) Glej odstavka 6.12 in 6.13.
EN 6.51. — The Commission agrees with the recommendations, and is working on a number of possible improvements to its processes, both for FP7 and for the future Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding. — The Commission agrees that primary controls remain an area for attention as confirmed by the AAR 2010. 
SL 6.51 — Komisija se strinja s priporočili in razvija več možnih izboljšav svojih postopkov, in sicer tako za 7. OP kot za prihodnji skupni strateški okvir za financiranje raziskav in inovacij v EU. — Komisija se strinja, da je treba tudi v prihodnje veliko pozornosti nameniti primarnim kontrolam, kar je bilo potrjeno tudi v poro­ čilu o dejavnostih za leto 2010.
The Commission will thus continue to stress the importance of attaining the set levels and documenting the process to National Agencies and will continue to remind the National Authorities of their supervision responsibilities in this domain. 
Komisija bo pri nacionalnih agencijah še naprej poudarjala pomen dosege zastavljenih ciljnih stopenj in dokumentiranja postopka ter nacionalne organe tudi v prihodnje opozarjala na njihovo nadzorno odgovornost na tem področju.
The administrative management of the Fund is carried out by the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN) while the European Investment Bank (EIB) is responsible for its treasury management. 
Sklad administrativno upravlja Generalni direktorat za gospodarske in finančne zadeve (GD ECFIN), za vodenje zakladništva pa je odgovorna Evropska investicijska banka (EIB).
At 31 December 2010, the Fund’s total resources were 1 347 million euro, compared with 1 240 million euro at 31 December 2009. 
6.53 Nadan31.decembra2010soskupnasredstvasklada znašala 1 347 milijonov EUR, 31. decembra 2009 pa 1 240 milijonov EUR.
No guarantee calls were made on the Fund in the year under review. 6.54. 
V pregledanem letu ni sklad prejel nobenega poziva za izpolnitev jamstva.
The return on the Fund’s portfolio in 2010 amounted to 1,06 %, compared with a benchmark return of 1,19 %. 
Donos portfelja sklada je leta 2010 znašal 1,06 %, primerjalni donos pa 1,19 %.
TheinvestmentportfoliooftheGuaranteeFundis managed by the EIB on behalf of the European Union (26). 
6.55 NaložbeniportfeljJamstvenegaskladazaEvropsko unijo upravlja EIB (26).
To avoid a forced sale of downgraded Member States' securities in June 2010, the Commission retrospectively introduced a new provision allowing such investments to be held in the Fund's portfolio. T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S _____________ (24) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 of 31 October 1994 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions (OJ L 293, 12.11.1994, p. 
Da bi preprečili prisilno prodajo vred­ nostnih papirjev držav članic z znižano boniteto, je Komisija junija 2010 retroaktivno sprejela novo določbo, ki omogoča, da se takšne naložbe hranijo v portfelju sklada. O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E _____________ (24) Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94 z dne 31. oktobra 1994 o ustanovitvi Jamstvenega sklada za zunanje ukrepe (UL L 293, 12.11.1994, str.
(25) Principally the EIB, but also Euratom external lending and EC macro financial assistance (MFA) loans to third countries. 
(25) Zlasti EIB, vendar tudi zunanja posojila Euratom in posojila tretjim državam v okviru makrofinančne pomoči ES (MFA).
(26) Article 6 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 and the EIB receives an annual management fee for the services provided. 6.54. 
(26) Člen 6 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94. EIB za opravljene storitve prejme letno nadomestilo za upravljanje.
6.55. This decision was formalised in the supplementary agreement No 4 which was signed on 9 November 2010, as soon as the institutional procedures required for its signature had been completed. 
6.54 6.55 Ta odločitev je bila formalno potrjena z dopolnilnim spora­ zumom št. 4, ki je bil podpisan 9. novembra 2010, takoj ko so bili končani institucionalni postopki, potrebni za njegov podpis.
During the current market environment of high volatility, short term deviations from the benchmark can happen. 
V sedanjem tržnem okolju z visoko volatilnostjo lahko pride do kratkotrajnih odstopanj od primerjalnih vrednosti.
Nevertheless, the portfolio has delivered positive excess return for the first 10 months of the year, whereas the slightly negative cut-off figure (compared to the benchmark) reported at the end of 2010, resulting from the November and December underperformance, was already recuperated in January 2011. 
Kljub temu pa portfelj za prvih deset mesecev leta prinaša pozitiven presežni donos, medtem ko je bila (v primerjavi s primerjalno vrednostjo) nekoliko negativna stopnja, ki je bila zabeležena konec leta 2010 in je posle­ dica slabše uspešnosti v novembru in decembru, januarja 2011 že popravljena.
For details refer to Chapter 1, paragraph 1.12. 
Za podrobnosti glej poglavje 1, odstavek 1.12.
(2) To improve insight into areas with different risk profiles within the policy group, the sample was split up into segments. 
(2) Zaradi izboljšanja vpogleda na področja z različnimi profili tveganja znotraj skupine politik je vzorec razdeljen v segmente.
(3) Numbers quoted in brackets represent the actual number of transactions. 
(3) V oklepajih navedene številke pomenijo dejansko število transakcij.
(38) 0% (0) 6% 3% 2% 3% (1) 39% 32 % 18% 
97% (38) 55% 0% (0) 6% 3% 2% 3% (1) 39% 32% 18%
(8) Österreichischer Austauschdienst — GmbH. 
(8) Österreichische Austauschdienst – GmbH.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 187 ANNEX 6.3 RESULTS OF REVIEW OF COMMISSION MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND OTHER INTERNAL POLICIES Main DGs concerned Nature of declaration given by director-general (*) Reservations given Court observations Overall assessment of reliability 2010 2009 RTD with reservation Reservation concerning the rate of residual error with regard to the accuracy of cost claims under FP6 grants. A A INFSO without reservation — Although in 2010 the cumu­ lative rate detected and the residual error rate on cost claims under FP6 grants reached 3,94% and 2,2% respectively, the reservation regarding the accuracy of FP6 cost claims was lifted. 
SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 187 PRILOGA 6.3 REZULTATI PREGLEDA POSLOVODSKIH PREDSTAVITEV KOMISIJE ZA RAZISKAVE IN DRUGE NOTRANJE POLITIKE Glavni zadevni gene­ ralni direkto­ rati Vrsta izjave generalnega direktorja (*) Pridržki Opažanja Sodišča Skupna ocena zanesljivosti 2010 2009 RTD s pridržkom Pridržek glede stopnje preostalih napak v zvezi s točnostjo zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov v okviru donacij iz 6. OP. A A INFSO brez pridržkov — Pridržek v zvezi s točnostjo zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov za 6.
B A ENTR with reservation (i) Reservation concerning the rate of residual error with regard to the accuracy of cost claims under FP6 grants. (ii) Reservation concerning the reliability of the financial reporting by the European Space Agency. — A A EAC with reservation Too high error rate in centralised direct management, due to lack of justifying documents for cost claims, mainly concerning projects from the previous generation of programmes (continuation of 2009 reservation). — A A ERCEA without reservation — — A N/A REA without reservation — — A (*) By reference to the declaration by the assurance of Director-General, he/she has reasonable assurance that the control procedures put in place give the necessary guarantees concerning the regularity of transactions. 
B A ENTR s pridržkom (i) Pridržek glede stopnje preostalih napak v zvezi s točnostjo zahtevkov za povra­ čilo stroškov v okviru donacij iz 6. OP. (ii) Pridržek glede zanesljivosti finančnega poročanja Evropske vesoljske agencije. — A A EAC s pridržkom Previsoka stopnja napak pri centraliziranem neposrednem upravljanju zaradi pomanjkanja dokazil za zahtevke za povračilo stroškov, v glavnem v zvezi s projekti iz prejšnje generacije programov (pridržek še iz leta 2009). — A A ERCEA brez pridržkov — — A NR REA brez pridržkov — — A (*) Glede na izjavo o zanesljivosti generalnega direktorja ima ta razumno zagotovilo, da vzpostavljeni kontrolni postopki dajejo potrebna jamstva v zvezi s pravilnostjo transakcij.
A: the Director-General’s declaration and the Annual Activity Report give a fair assessment of financial management in relation to regularity. 
A: Izjava generalnega direktorja in letno poročilo o dejavnostih vsebujeta pošteno oceno pravilnosti finančnega poslovodenja.
C: the Director-General’s declaration and the Annual Activity Report do not give a fair assessment of financial management in relation to regularity. 
C: Izjava generalnega direktorja in letno poročilo o dejavnostih ne vsebujeta poštene ocene pravilnosti finančnega poslovodenja.
2008 The Commission should ensure rigorous application of the controls, in particular by imposing penalties where appropriate and making recoveries or adjustments in cases of undue reimbursement of claimed costs (paragraph 7.42). 
2008 Komisija bi morala zagotoviti strogo uporabo kontrol, zlasti z nalaganjem kazni, kadar je primerno, in izterjavami ali popravki v primerih neupravičenega povra­ čila prijavljenih stroškov (odstavek 7.42).
The Commission made considerable efforts in this area. 
Komisija je veliko storila na tem področju.
This included an increased ex-post audit effort, which is the key element of the control strategy, and issuing recoveries or setting off against future payments any amounts found to have been overpaid to beneficiaries. 
To je zajemalo večja prizadevanja pri naknadnih revizijah, ki so ključni element strategije kontrol, in izdajanje nalogov za izterjavo vseh zneskov, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bili preveč izplačani upravičencem, ali pa upoštevanje teh zneskov pri prihodnjih plačilih.
The Commission continues with its efforts to implement audit results, by recovering over-claimed amounts, imposing liquidated damages and furthermore, constantly monitoring the progress made in this area. 
Komisija si še naprej prizadeva za izvajanje rezultatov revizij z izterjavo čezmerno izplačanih zneskov, nalaga­ njem pogodbenih kazni in tudi z nenehnim spremljanjem napredka na tem področju.
Moreover, the Commission following the recommendation of the Court is consistently imposing liquidated damages in all cases in which overstated costs claims have resulted in unjustified financial contributions. 
Poleg tega Komisija po pripo­ ročilu Sodišča nenehno nalaga pogodbene kazni za vse primere, pri katerih je zaradi čezmernih zahtevkov za povračilo stroškov prišlo do neupravičenih finančnih prispevkov. revizorjev, ki izvajajo potrjevanje, o upravi­ čenosti odhodkov, da se bo izboljšala zane­ sljivost revizijskih potrdil, ki jih izdajajo (odstavek 8.32).
The inherent complexity of the eligibility criteria impacts on the work performed by the external auditors mandated by the beneficiaries to issue audit certificates. 
Zapletenost pravil za upravičenost vpliva na delo zunanjih revizorjev, ki so jih upravičenci pooblastili za izdajanje potrdil o revizijah.
The Commission considers that for FP7 the introduction of ‘agreed upon procedures’ will increase the certifying auditors’ awareness of the eligibility of expenditure and thus improve the reliability of the audit certificates. 
OP uvedba „dogovor­ jenih postopkov“ povečala ozaveščenost revizorjev, ki izdajajo potrdila, o upravičenosti odhodkov in da bi se tako izboljšala zanesljivost revizijskih potrdil.
The Commission monitors the reliability of the audit certificates. 
Komisija spremlja zanesljivost revizijskih potrdil.
However, at this stage it is still too early to conclude if there is a significant decrease in errors. 
Vendar se na tej stopnji še ne da sklepati, ali so se napake znatno zmanjšale.
The Court recommends that the Commission continues to reinforce the checks on closures to ensure that errors are detected and corrected and prevent the recurrence of previously identified errors (paragraph 7.20). 
Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija še naprej krepi preglede zaključevanj projektov, da zagotovi, da se napake odkrijejo in popra­ vijo, ter prepreči ponavljanje že ugotovljenih napak (odstavek 7.20).
The Commission has made efforts in this area, particularly with the introduction of the Lifelong Learning Programme for the period 2007-2013. 
Komisija si je na tem področju prizadevala za izboljšanje, zlasti pri uvedbi programa Vseživljenjsko učenje za obdobje 2007–2013.
The errors detected by the Court for 2009 related to the Socrates II programme which was the predecessor of the Lifelong Learning Programme. 
Napake, ki jih je Sodišče odkrilo za leto 2009, so se nanašale na program Socrates II, ki je bil predhodnik programa Vseživljenjsko učenje.
The Court takes note of the Commission’s reply Except for DG ENTR, the Commission does not formally communicate with the external auditors by providing feedback when it has been proved, either as a result of the Court’s audits or its own, that the certificate issued was unre­ liable. 
Komisija izraža zadovoljno ob napredku, ki ga je ugoto­ Sodišče se seznanja z Razen za GD ENTR Komisija zunanjim revizorjem ne daje uradnih povratnih informacij, kadar so njene lastne revizije ali revizije Sodišča dokazale, da izdano potrdilo ni bilo zane­ sljivo.
This is an effective way of raising the certifying auditors’ awareness of the expenditure eligibility issues which the auditors may have overlooked. 
Povratne informacije so učinkovit način za osveščanje revizorjev, ki izdajajo potrdila, o vprašanjih, povezanih z upra­ vičenostjo odhodkov, ki so jih revizorji morda spregledali.
The Commission recently approved a decision to simplify the acceptance of average costing methodologies for claiming personnel costs. 
Komisija je pred nedavnim odobrila sklep o poenostavitvi sprejetja metodologij obračunavanja povprečnih stroškov za zahtevke za povračilo stroškov dela.
This decision is indeed expected to significantly simplify and facilitate the management of the research programmes. 
S tem sklepom naj bi se dejansko znatno poenostavilo in olajšalo upravljanje programov na področju raziskav.
The Commission has followed up all quantifiable errors and recovered non-eligible amounts. 
Komisija je ukrepala v zvezi z vsemi količinsko opredeljivimi napakami in izterjala neupravičene zneske.
During 2010, the Court observed a significant increase in the amounts of liquidated damages due to the Commission as a result of a beneficiary overstating its declared costs. 
Sodišče je za leto 2010 opazilo precejšnje povečanje zneska pogodbenih kazni, dolgovanih Komisiji, ker so upravičenci prijavljali previsoke stroške.
ANNEX 6.4 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND OTHER INTERNAL POLICIES 
PRILOGA 6.4 SPREMLJANJE IZVAJANJA PREJŠNJIH PRIPOROČIL ZA RAZISKAVE IN DRUGE NOTRANJE POLITIKE vilo Sodišče. odgovorom Komisije.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 189 Year Court Recommendation Progress made Commission reply Court analysis 2008 The Court takes note of the Commission’s reply The Commission should engage in closer supervision of the annual ex-post declaration process with direct verification that the controls described are adequate and fully applied (paragraph 9.34). 
V letu 2010 je izvedel tudi 47 obiskov zaradi spremljanja (v primerjavi z 58 v letu 2009). Komisija bi morala natančneje nadzirati postopek naknadne letne izjave z nepo­ srednim preverjanjem, ali so opisane kontrole ustrezne in ali se v celoti upora­ bljajo (odstavek 9.34).
Overall, the Commission has made efforts in this area. 
Komisija je na splošno precej storila na tem področju.
EN 10.11.2011 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 191 CHAPTER 7 Administrative and other expenditure TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 7.1-7.8 Specific characteristics of the policy group Audit scope and approach Regularity of transactions Effectiveness of systems Reliability of Commission management representations Observations on specific institutions and bodies Parliament European Council and Council Commission Court of Justice Court of Auditors European Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions European Ombudsman European Data Protection Supervisor Conclusions and recommendations Conclusions Recommendations Paragraph 7.4-7.5 7.6-7.8 7.9 7.10 7.11 7.12-7.32 7.13-7.18 7.19-7.20 7.21-7.22 7.23 7.24 7.25-7.27 7.28-7.30 7.31 7.32 7.33-7.36 7.33-7.34 7.35-7.36 
GD EAC je v letu 2010 izvedel Sodišče se seznanja z odgovorom Komisije. SL 10.11.2011 UradnilistEvropskeunije 191 Pravilnost transakcij Uspešnost sistemov Zanesljivost poslovodskih predstavitev Komisije Opažanja o posameznih institucijah in organih Parlament Evropski svet in Svet Komisija Sodišče Evropske unije Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor Odbor regij Evropski varuh človekovih pravic Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov Zaključki in priporočila Zaključki Priporočila 7.25–7.27 7.28–7.30 7.31 7.32 7.33–7.36 7.33–7.34 7.35–7.36 POGLAVJE 7 Upravni in drugi odhodki KAZALO Odstavek 7.1–7.8 7.4–7.5 7.6–7.8 7.9 7.10 7.11 7.12–7.32 7.13–7.18 7.19–7.20 7.21–7.22 7.23 Računskosodišče 7.24 Uvod Posebne značilnosti te skupine politik Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop
EN 192 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 10.11.2011 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S INTRODUCTION 7.1. This chapter presents the Court’s specific assessment of the administrative and other expenditure of the Institutions and bodies of the European Union. 
SL 192 UradnilistEvropskeunije 10.11.2011 U G O T OV I T V E S OD I Š Č A UVOD 7.1 Sodišče v tem poglavju predstavlja svojo posebno oceno upravnih in drugih odhodkov institucij in organov Evropske unije.
Key information on the Institutions and bodies covered, and on the spending in 2010 is provided in Table 7.1. 
Ključne informacije o obravnavanih institucijah in organih ter o porabi v letu 2010 so v tabeli 7.1.