natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reply of the Commission 57 Observations Common Commission reply to paragraphs 20-22 In the 2007-2013 programming period, the Member States were requested to justify their investment priorities based on a SWOT analysis of needs. 
Odgovori Komisije 57 Opažanja Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke 20–22 V programskem obdobju 2007–2013 so morale države članice na podlagi analize potreb po metodi SWOT upravičiti svoje prednostne naložbe.
Coordination was to be ensured at national and/or regional level. 
Usklajevanje je bilo treba zagotoviti na nacionalni in/ali regionalni ravni.
The Member States and/or regions have been considering together the need for complementarities on the basis of demarcation. 
Države članice in/ali regije so skupaj obravnavale potrebo po dopolnjevanju na podlagi razmejevanja.
Often integrated approaches at regional and local level have been followed aiming at optimising the EU co-funding. 
Pogosto so sledili celostni pristopi na regionalni in lokalni ravni, ki so bili namenjeni optimizaciji sofinanciranja EU.
23 Based on lessons learnt during the 2007-2013 programming period, the legal framework for the 2014-2020 programming period reinforces a strategic approach to programming and enhances complementarity among EU and national funds. 
23 Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih med programskim obdobjem 2007–2013, pravni okvir za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 krepi strateški pristop k načrtovanju programov in izboljšuje dopolnjevanje med skladi EU in nacionalnimi skladi.
24 The interventions under the RDPs are co-financed by the Commission and the Member States. 
24 Posredovanja prek programov razvoja podeželja sofinancirajo Komisija in države članice.
In the context of scarcity of national financial resources, the EAFRD has allowed the Member States and regions to fund interventions in rural areas, which otherwise may have not been financed, to the benefit of local populations. 
Zaradi pomanjkanja nacionalnih finančnih sredstev je EKSRP državam članicam in regijam omogočil, da financirajo posredovanja na podeželju v korist lokalnega prebivalstva, ki se sicer morda ne bi financirala.
Box 2 — Italy (Sicily) According to the Sicilian authorities, the region experienced a lack of national or regional resources to fund structural investments. 
Okvir 2, Italija (Sicilija) Po navedbah sicilskih organov je regiji primanjkovalo nacionalnih ali regionalnih virov za financiranje strukturnih naložb.
In this context, the EAFRD has allowed the region to fund interventions in rural areas, which otherwise may have not been financed. 
EKSRP je zato regiji omogočil financiranje posredovanja na podeželju, ki se sicer morda ne bi financirala.
When establishing the legal framework for the 2014-2020 programming period, the Commission has taken the necessary steps to improve coordination between different funds as regards the support to rural infrastructures. 
Komisija je pri oblikovanju pravnega okvira za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 sprejela potrebne ukrepe za izboljšanje usklajevanja med različnimi skladi, kar zadeva podporo podeželski infrastrukturi.
Coordination and complementarity of EU funds at the level of national/ regional strategies is addressed by the different services of the Commission. 
Za usklajevanje in dopolnjevanje skladov EU na ravni nacionalnih/regionalnih strategij skrbijo različne službe Komisije.
It is however for national/ regional authorities to enforce such coordination/ complementarity at measure/project levels when implementing the programmes. 
Nacionalni/regionalni organi pa morajo takšno usklajevanje/dopolnjevanje izvrševati na ravni ukrepov/projektov pri izvajanju programov.
The Commission will regularly monitor and assess implementation in the Member States within the established framework for performance monitoring and reporting. 
Komisija bo redno spremljala in ocenjevala izvajanje v državah članicah znotraj vzpostavljenega okvira za spremljanje uspešnosti in poročanje.
V (c) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
V (c) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
V (d) The Commission accepts this recommendation. However, given the limited value of assessing measures in isolation, the Commission is of the opinion that evaluation should be carried out at the level of the focus areas, which reflect policy objectives. 
V (d) Komisija sprejema to priporočilo, ker pa ima ločeno ocenjevanje ukrepov omejeno vrednost, meni, da bi bilo treba vrednotenje izvajati na ravni prednostnih območij, ki izražajo cilje politike.
Moreover, the Commission stresses the importance of evaluation to interpret and analyse the data collected in order to draw conclusions on effectiveness or efficiency. 
Komisija poleg tega poudarja pomen vrednotenja za razlago in analizo zbranih podatkov, da se oblikujejo zaključki o učinkovitosti ali uspešnosti.
V (e) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
V (e) To priporočilo velja za države članice.
Reply of the Commission 58 Box 2 — Germany (Saxony) The substitution of public funds illustrated by the case of Saxony is a consequence of the annuality of budget spending in Germany, while the RDP is a multiannual programme (7 years) for the implementation of which the rule ‘n+ 2’ applies. 
Odgovori Komisije 58 Okvir 2, Nemčija (Saška) Nadomestitev javnih sredstev v primeru Saške je posledica enoletnosti proračunske porabe v Nemčiji, medtem ko je program razvoja podeželja večletni (7-letni), pri čemer za njegovo izvajanje velja pravilo „n + 2“.
25 The substitution of public funds by the EAFRD at project level does not necessarily entail the absence of additional effects on the outcome. 
25 Nadomestitev javnih sredstev z EKSRP na ravni projektov ne pomeni nujno odsotnosti dodatnih vplivov na rezultat.
It is not demonstrated, based on the audited projects, that the EAFRD measures have not supported investments for which the financial returns were insufficient to justify the full costs of the investment. 
Na podlagi revidiranih projektov ni mogoče dokazati, da ukrepi v okviru EKSRP niso podprli naložb, katerih finančni donosi so bili nezadostni, da bi upravičili celotne stroške naložbe.
26 Backing aid rates with economic analysis is not foreseen in the legislation. 
26 Zakonodaja ne določa, da je določitev stopnje pomoči pogojena z ekonomsko analizo.
However, several Member States justified the need for RDP intervention and conducted macroeconomic analyses. For example: — the Sicily RDP does include an analysis of agriculture, forestry and rural areas and provide for an identification of relevant needs; — the Romania RDP includes a description of the need for infrastructure investments including some quantification of needs. 
Vendar so nekatere države članice utemeljile potrebo po posredovanju v okviru programa razvoja podeželja in izvedle makroekonomske analize, npr.: – program razvoja podeželja za Sicilijo vključuje analizo kmetijskih, gozdnih in podeželskih območij ter omogoča opredelitev ustreznih potreb; – program razvoja podeželja za Romunijo vsebuje opis potrebe za infrastrukturne naložbe, vključno z nekaterimi količinskimi opredelitvami potreb.
The co-financing rates were set up at axis level taking into account macroeconomic criteria. 
Stopnje sofinanciranja so bile določene na ravni osi ob upoštevanju makroekonomskih kriterijev.
See also common Commission reply to paragraphs 20-22. 
Glej skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke 20–22.
29 Projects can be funded through EAFRD support and/or national resources. 
29 Projekti se lahko financirajo prek podpore EKSRP in/ ali nacionalnih virov.
This does not mean that projects would have been implemented even in the absence of the RDP funds. 
To ne pomeni, da bi bili projekti izvedeni tudi brez sredstev v okviru programa razvoja podeželja.
The Commission is of the opinion that appropriate selection criteria represent an essential means to ensure an effective targeting of support. 
Komisija meni, da so primerna izbirna merila bistvena za zagotovitev učinkovite usmerjenosti podpore.
The checking of the financial capacity of individual applicants should not lead to a disproportionate administrative burden for the managing authorities. 
Preverjanje finančne zmožnosti posameznih vlagateljev ne bi smelo povzročiti nesorazmerne upravne obremenitve za organe upravljanja.
Box 4 In the case of Sicily, the Italian authorities have identified double funding and consequently the projects concerned have been excluded from the aid granted under the RDP. 
Okvir 4 V primeru Sicilije so italijanske oblasti ugotovile dvojno financiranje in zadevni projekti so bili posledično izključeni iz pomoči v okviru programa razvoja podeželja.
31 The setting up of demarcation criteria is one possible way to avoid double funding. 
31 Določitev razmejitvenih meril je ena izmed možnosti za izognitev dvojnemu financiranju.
However, the overlapping of public funds can occur as long as double funding of the same items is avoided as it does not necessarily entail a lack of added value from the different interventions. 
Vendar je prekrivanje javnih sredstev mogoče, če se prepreči dvojno financiranje istih postavk, saj to ne nujno pomeni, da druga posredovanja ne morejo prinesti dodane vrednosti.
31 First bullet According to Article 56 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the EAFRD finances only ‘small infrastructure’ in the measure ‘basic services’. 
31, prva alinea V skladu s členom 56 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005, se iz EKSRP financira samo „mala infrastruktura“ z ukrepi za „osnovne storitve“.
For this reason the RDP for Saxony set up a celling for these types of projects. 
Zato je bila v okviru programa razvoja podeželja Saške za te vrste projektov določena zgornja meja.
This does not prevent the ERDF from supporting integrated projects. 
To ne preprečuje dodeljevanja sredstev iz ESRR za podporo integriranim projektom.
31 Second bullet The demarcation criteria set by Sicily in the RDP are clear and do not allow the overlapping of public funds. 
31, druga alinea Razmejitvena merila, ki jih je Sicilija določila v programu razvoja podeželja, so jasna in ne dovoljujejo prekrivanja javnih sredstev.
The managing authority is responsible for the implementation of appropriate controls to ensure the respect of the demarcation. 
Organ upravljanja je odgovoren z izvajanje ustreznega nadzora, da se zagotovi spoštovanje razmejitve.
31 Third bullet The Polish RDP for 2007-2013 contains demarcation rules regarding: (a) type of the project: for example broadband skeleton infrastructure for the ERDF; ‘last-mile’ for the EAFRD; (b) localisation: for example broadband in ‘white’ rural areas (i.e. with no access to broadband). 
31, tretja alinea Poljski program razvoja podeželja za obdobje 2007– 2013 vsebuje razmejitvena merila glede: (a) vrste projekta: na primer okvirna širokopasovna infrastruktura za Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESRR); zadnji del povezave za EKSRP. (b) lokacije: na primer širokopasovna povezava na podeželskih območjih t.i. belih lis (tj. območjih, ki nimajo širokopasovnega dostopa).
This means that a single project can only be funded from a single source at any given point in time. 
To pomeni, da se lahko en projekt kadar koli financira samo iz enega vira.
Reply of the Commission 59 32 Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 refers to the obligation of establishing demarcation criteria only in relation to EU support instruments. 
Odgovori Komisije 59 32 Člen 60 Uredbe 1968/2005 se nanaša na obveznost, da se določijo razmejitvena merila samo za instrument podpore EU.
The management of national funds and the setting up of national/regional coordination structures are the responsibility of the Member States. 
Države članice so odgovorne za upravljanje nacionalnih skladov in vzpostavitev nacionalnih/regionalnih struktur za usklajevanje.
The overlapping between the EU and national funds in a given area does not jeopardise complementarity as long as double funding of the same operation is avoided. 
S prekrivanjem skladov EU in nacionalnih skladov v določenem območju se ne ogrozi dopolnjevanje, če ne pride do dvojnega financiranja iste operacije.
33 Several Member States took actions to ensure complementarity between the funds. For example: — Romania set up a mechanism aimed at promoting complementarity; — Italy has set up a framework within which all EU-supported regional programmes can operate in synergy to achieve common objectives. 
33 Več držav članic je sprejelo ukrepe za zagotovitev dopolnjevanja med skladi, npr.: – Romunija je vzpostavila mehanizem, ki je namenjen spodbujanju dopolnjevanja; – Italija je vzpostavila okvir, v katerem se lahko vsi regionalni programi, ki jih podpira EU, izvajajo v sinergiji, da se dosežejo skupni cilji.
35 Coordination was to be ensured at national and/or regional level. 
35 Usklajevanje je bilo treba zagotoviti na nacionalni in/ali regionalni ravni.
36 As regards Romania, this single example does not mean that there is no complementarity between the funds. 
36 Kar zadeva Romunijo, ta osamljeni primer ne pomeni, da med skladi ni dopolnjevanja.
As regards Sicily, the region has been requested by the Commission to clarify in the draft 2014-2020 RDP that no support can be granted for the restructuring of roads which have fallen into disrepair because of a lack of regular maintenance or for new roads in areas already served by roads which have fallen into disrepair because of a lack of maintenance. 
Komisija je od Sicilije zahtevala, da v osnutku programa za razvoj podeželja za obdobje 2014–2020 pojasni, da ni mogoče dodeliti podpore za obnovo cest, ki so v slabem stanju zaradi pomanjkanja vzdrževanja, ali za izgradnjo novih cest na območjih, kjer ceste že obstajajo, vendar so v slabem stanju zaradi pomanjkanja vzdrževanja.
38 In 2007-2013, programmes could only be approved in the presence of needs analyses backing satisfactorily the Member States’ strategic choices. 
38 V obdobju 2007–2013 so bili programi lahko odobreni samo, če so vključevali analizo potreb, ki je zadovoljivo upravičila strateške odločitve držav članic.
Only overlaps between funds for the same type of operations can be accepted, provided this does not lead to double funding of the same undertakings. 
Dovoljeno je samo prekrivanje med skladi za iste vrste dejavnosti pod pogojem, da to ne povzroči dvojnega financiranja istih podjetij.
In 2007-2013, complementarity between Community support instruments was sought by the establishment of demarcation criteria. 
V obdobju 2007–2013 so skušali doseči dopolnjevanje med instrumenti podpore Skupnosti z določitvijo razmejitvenih meril.
See also Commission common reply to paragraphs 20-22. 
Glej tudi skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke 20–22.
40 Substitution does not necessarily entail the absence of added value from the different funds. 
40 Nadomestitev ne nujno pomeni odsotnosti dodane vrednosti iz drugih skladov.
Substitution was necessary in some cases due to a difficult situation in the public finances of many Member States and regions. 
Nadomestitev je bila v nekaterih primerih nujna zaradi težav, ki jih je na področju javnih financ imelo veliko držav članic in regij.
41 Complementarity in the intervention by different funds is considered in the partnership agreements and at the level of operational and rural development programmes. 
41 Dopolnjevanje pri posredovanju iz različnih skladov se obravnava v partnerskih sporazumih ter na ravni operativnih programov in programov razvoja podeželja.
The Romanian partnership agreement contains information on synergies between different funds and details of coordination mechanisms. 
Romunski partnerski sporazum vsebuje informacije o sinergijah med različnimi skladi in podatke o usklajevalnih mehanizmih.
Moreover, at the level of individual measure fiches, Romania has indicated possible complementarity and coordination with other funds. 
Poleg tega je Romunija v posameznih podatkovnih listih prikazala morebitno dopolnjevanje in usklajevanje z drugimi skladi.
The issue of complementarity was extensively discussed with the Member States during the negotiations regarding the 2014-2020 RDPs. 
Države članice so v okviru pogajanj glede programov razvoja podeželja za obdobje 2014–2020 temeljito razpravljale o vprašanju dopolnjevanja.
The Commission has provided appropriate guidance to the Member States on these issues. 
Komisija je v zvezi s temi vprašanji državam članicam zagotovila ustrezne smernice.
Reply of the Commission 60 48 It is the responsibility of the Member States and regions to make sure that selection criteria are correctly applied to ensure that only the best-quality projects are supported by EAFRD. 
48 Države članice in regije morajo zagotoviti, da se izbirna merila pravilno uporabljajo, s čimer se zagotovi, da se v okviru EKSRP podpirajo samo najka-kovostnejši projekti.
The Commission has provided guidance to the Member States as regards the application of appropriate selection criteria. 
Komisija je državam članicam zagotovila smernice v zvezi z uporabo ustreznih izbirnih meril.
Box 9 — Italy (Sicily) At the monitoring committee meeting in June 2013, the managing authority informed the Commission about the correct application of all selection criteria foreseen by the RDP. 
Okvir 9, Italija (Sicilija) Na sestanku nadzornega odbora junija 2013 je organ upravljanja obvestil Komisijo o pravilni uporabi vseh izbirnih meril, ki jih določa program razvoja podeželja.
Moreover, all new calls for proposals after June 2013 for measures under axes 1 and 3 included a minimum threshold of points to further ensure the quality of the selected projects. 
Poleg tega so po juniju 2013 vsi novi razpisi za zbiranje predlogov za ukrepe v okviru osi 1 in osi 3 vsebovali spodnji prag točk, da se še dodatno zagotovi kakovost izbranih projektov.
50 The Commission has issued guidance on reasonableness of costs which addresses the need to make risk-based checks according to amounts and aid intensities at stake. 
50 Komisija je izdala smernice o razumnosti stroškov, ki obravnavajo potrebo po opravljanju pregledov na osnovi tveganj v skladu z obsegom in intenzivnostjo zadevne pomoči.
51 In its guidance on rural development controls and penalties, the Commission encourages Member States to have reliable price databases in place and if possible to complement this system with a comparison of offers and expert opinions. 
51 Komisija v smernicah o nadzoru in kaznih na področju razvoja podeželja spodbuja države članice, naj vzdržujejo zanesljive podatkovne zbirke cen in če je možno, naj ta sistem dopolnijo s primerjavo ponudb in mnenj strokovnjakov.
Box 11 — Spain (Extremadura) During the approval process for the 2014-2020 RDP for Extremadura, the Commission addressed the issue of direct awarding of the aids to state-owned companies, in particular with regard to the justification of prices. 
Okvir 11, Španija (Ekstremadura) Med postopkom sprejetja programa razvoja podeželja za Ekstremaduro za obdobje 2014–2020 je Komisija obravnavala vprašanje neposredne dodelitve pomoči podjetjem v državni lasti, še posebej kar zadeva upravičenost cen.
This weakness is expected to be addressed in the 2014-2020 RDP. 
Ta slabost bo predvidoma obravnavana v programu razvoja podeželja za obdobje 2014–2020.
Reply of the Commission 61 56 While requiring the submission of a maintenance plan may be considered as a good practice for certain investments, there is no legal obligation to do so. 
Odgovori Komisije 61 56 Čeprav zahteva za predložitev načrta vzdrževanja velja za dobro prakso pri nekaterih naložbah, za to ni pravne obveze.
57 The Commission has also identified this risk, and following the Court’s specific findings on this issue, it has been included in the Romanian error rate action plan. 
57 Komisija je ugotovila tudi to tveganje in na podlagi posebnih ugotovitev Sodišča v zvezi s tem, je bilo to tveganje vključeno v romunski akcijski načrt za določanje stopnje napak.
58 The 2014-2020 RDP for Sicily had not been approved at the time of the audit. 
58 Program razvoja podeželja za Sicilijo za obdobje 2014–2020 ni bil odobren v času revizije.
Following negotiations with the regional authorities, it has been decided that the costs of these projects will not be supported under the 2014-2020 RDP. 
Po pogajanjih z regionalnimi organi je bilo odločeno, da stroški teh projektov ne bodo podprti v okviru programa razvoja podeželja za obdobje 2014–2020.
60 According to Article 71 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, in the 2014-2020 programming period the 5-year period cannot start at the time of approval of the application but will start with the last payment to the beneficiary. 
60 V skladu s členom 71 Uredbe (ES) št. 1303/2013 v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 ni mogoče začeti petletnega obdobja v času odobritve vloge, ampak se bo začelo ob izvršitvi zadnjega plačila upravičencu.
61 During the 2014-2020 programming period negotiations the Commission encouraged the Member States to speed up the administrative processes so that beneficiaries can implement the operations from the beginning of the programming period. 
61 Med pogajanji za programsko obdobje 2014–2020 je Komisija spodbudila države članice, naj pospešijo upravne postopke, da bi upravičenci lahko začeli izvajati operacije od začetka programskega obdobja.
62 While setting administrative deadlines may be considered as a good practice, there are no legal provisions that empower the Commission to force Member States to set such deadlines. 
62 Čeprav določanje upravnih rokov velja za dobro prakso, pravne določbe, ki bi Komisijo pooblaščale, da od držav članic zahteva določitev teh rokov, ne obstajajo.
63 The Member States have been reminded of the importance of a timely implementation of the measures to ensure a successful execution of the programmes and an efficient use of EU funds during the annual review meetings and the meetings of the monitoring committees. 
63 Države članice so bile med sestanki za letne preglede in na sestankih nadzornega odbora opozorjene na pomen pravočasnega izvajanja ukrepov, da se zagotovi uspešna izvedba programov in učinkovita uporaba skladov EU.
67 The Commission's audits found similar weaknesses to those identified by the Court, such as non-conformities with regard to the selection of projects, the reasonableness of the costs or non-compliances with public procurement provisions. 
67 Revizije Komisije so pokazale podobne slabosti, kot jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, na primer neskladja glede izbire projektov, razumnosti stroškov ali neskladja glede določb o javnih naročilih.
Based on the findings of these audits, the audited Member States undertook to take corrective measures in order to improve the performance of the abovementioned areas. 
Na podlagi ugotovitev teh revizij so se revidirane države članice zavezale k sprejetju popravnih ukrepov, da bi izboljšale uspešnost na zgoraj omenjenih območjih.
70 The only outstanding modification of the (national) public procurement law in Poland entered into force on 19 October 2014. 
70 Edina nerešena sprememba (nacionalne) zakonodaje o javnih naročilih na Poljskem je začela veljati 19. oktobra 2014.
Assessment by the Commission is ongoing. 
Ocenjevanje Komisije je v teku.
Romania did develop during 2015, in conjunction with the Commission services, a reinforced action plan for this ex ante conditionality. 
Romunija je s službami Komisije leta 2015 oblikovala okrepljen akcijski načrt za to predhodno pogojevanje.
This was adopted by the Romanian authorities on 9 July 2015 and is now being implemented for all ESIF programmes. 
Romunske oblasti so ta načrt sprejele 9. julija 2015 in zdaj se izvaja v okviru vseh programov evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skladi ESI).
71 The assessment of reasonableness of costs has been largely covered in the guidance on controls and penalties for rural development, which also includes information on the use of reference prices. 
71 Ocena razumnosti stroškov je bila v veliki meri zajeta v smernicah o nadzoru in kaznih na področju razvoja podeželja, ki vsebujejo tudi informacije o uporabi referenčnih cen.