natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
17. as a result of the evaluation of commission’s external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the Un family1, and since the time of the audit, instructions were issued to staff in Europeaid and in delegations on 17 June 2009. these instructions require them to record their assessment, when identifying proposals for financing through the Un, of the added value of this approach. the assessment process will therefore be more systematically and clearly documented. 
17. kot rezultat ocene zunanjega sodelovanja komisije z državami partnericami prek organizacij iz družine zn1 in revizije so bila 17. junija 2009 osebju Europeaid in osebju delegacij izdana navodila. Ta navodila od njih zahtevajo, da zapisujejo svoje ocene glede dodane vrednosti tega pristopa, kadar se opredeljujejo predlogi za financiranje prek zn. Postopek ocenjevanja bo tako bolj sistematično in jasno dokumentiran.
1 http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/evaluation_reports/ 2008/1252_docs_en.htm rEplY of thE commission the annual action programmes, as revised in 2008, require information on the implementing partners selected to be included, including the reasons for choosing the organisation and, if known and where appropriate, the name of the partners that the organisation will use to implement the action and the reasons for this arrangement. in the implementation of humanitarian aid the commission does not favour either the Un agencies or its other partners (ngos or other international organisations). the commission selects the partners on the basis of suitability and completeness of the proposals for a specific intervention presented in relation to the needs of victims of man-made and natural disasters. the evaluation found that ‘decisions to channel funds were, in the majority of cases examined, based on documented studies. for the others, little documented evidence could be retrieved on the rationale of the decisions, but commission staff generally consider that the decisions were justified.’ special report no 15/2009 - EU assistance implemented through United nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring 
1 http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/evaluation_reports/ 2008/1252_docs_en.htm odgovori komisijE letni akcijski programi, kot so bili pregledani leta 2008, zahtevajo, da se vključijo informacije o izbranih izvedbenih par-tnerjih, vključno z razlogi za izbiro organizacije in, če je znano in ustrezno, imeni partnerjev, ki jih bo organizacija uporabila za izvajanje ukrepa, ter z razlogi za tako ureditev. komisija pri izvajanju humanitarne pomoči ne daje prednosti agencijam zn niti njenim partnerjem (nevladne organizacije ali druge mednarodne organizacije). komisija izbira partnerje na podlagi primernosti in celovitosti predlogov za posebne intervencije, predstavljenih v povezavi s potrebami žrtev umetnih ali naravnih nesreč. ocena je pokazala, da so odločitve za posredovanje sredstev v večini pregledanih primerov temeljile na dokumentiranih študijah. za ostale odločitve je bilo najdenih malo dokumentiranih dokazov glede utemeljitve odločitev, toda komisija na splošno meni, da so bile odločitve utemeljene. Posebno poročilo št. 15/2009 - Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje
36 18. the instructions issued by Europeaid to delegation staff ensure that any proposal to channel funds through an international organisation is backed up with a clear written justification (see instruction note of 17 June 2009). in addition, the analyses of the section on international organisations included in the twice yearly external assistance management reports (Eamrs) have been communicated to operational staff and delegations. other initiatives have also been taken including, for example, the production of various methodological guidelines, the most recent of which covers technical cooperation, selected assessments of our Un partners, the production of a set of frequently asked question on international organisations and training courses of relevance to staff working with international organisations. 
36 18. navodila, ki jih je izdal Europeaid osebju delegacij, zagotavljajo, da je vsak predlog za posredovanje sredstev prek mednarodne organizacije podprt z jasno pisno utemeljitvijo (glej navodila z dne 17. junija 2009). Poleg tega so bile analize poglavja o mednarodnih organizacijah, ki so vključene v poročila o upravljanju zunanje pomoči (Eamr), ki so objavljena dvakrat letno, poslane operativnemu osebju in delegacijam. sprejete so bile tudi druge pobude, na primer priprava različnih metodoloških smernic, od katerih najsodobnejša pokriva tehnično sodelovanje, izbrane ocene naših partnerjev zn, pripravo sklopa pogosto zastavljenih vprašanj o mednarodnih organizacijah in tečajih usposabljanja za osebje, ki dela z mednarodnimi organizacijami.
19. monitoring information on all the past and current projects is now readily accessible to all desk officers. the commission is fully aware of the implementation capacity and strengths of individual Un agencies implementing humanitarian aid. the information on their past and planned activities in relation to ongoing and recurrent humanitarian crises is annually and individually revised in the ‘strategic programming dialogue’ meetings. rEplY of thE commission 20. the commission decides to channel funds through Un organisations for various reasons. in some cases there is no alternative, e.g. the Un has a clear mandate to act on behalf of the international community, or it has specific expertise not found elsewhere. in other cases the Un has been identified as the only alternative with the required logistical or management capacity for the operation in question. the Un has also frequently been selected as a partner because of its experience and ability to work in a post-crisis environment and its in-country presence in such situations. these reasons are reflected in the answers to the court's questionnaire. 
19. informacije o spremljanju vseh preteklih in sedanjih projektov so sedaj dostopne vsem uradnikom. komisija se v celoti zaveda izvedbenih zmogljivosti in prednosti posameznih agencij zn, ki izvajajo humanitarno pomoč. informacije o njihovih preteklih in načrtovanih dejavnostih v zvezi s tekočo in ponavljajočo se humanitarno krizo se letno in posamezno pregledujejo na srečanjih za „dialoge o strateškem načrto-vanju“. odgovori komisijE 20. komisija se za posredovanje sredstev prek organizacij zn odloči iz več razlogov. v nekaterih primerih druge možnosti ni, npr. zn imajo jasno pooblastilo za delovanje v imenu mednarodne skupnosti ali posebno znanje, ki ga drugje ni mogoče najti. v drugih primerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zn edina druga možnost s potrebnimi logističnimi ali upravljavskimi zmogljivostmi za zadevno operacijo. zn so bili pogosto izbrani za partnerja zaradi svojih izkušenj in sposobnosti delovati v okolju po krizi ter zaradi svoje prisotnosti v deželah v takih razmerah. Ti razlogi se odražajo v odgovorih na vprašalnik sodišča.
21. With regard to the decision making process and the replies to the court's questionnaire on this matter, the fact that an element is not indicated as one of the main three factors for decision does not mean that it is being disregarded or neglected. these factors have been taken into consideration as additional reasons but were not always considered among the three most relevant depending on the situation. funding for humanitarian aid is primarily directed to the areas of highest need and the capacity to deliver. considerations of cost and speed of delivery are also of great importance and for all large projects special attention is paid to the visibility component. the decision-making process is finalised by the authorising officer. special report no 15/2009 - EU assistance implemented through United nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring 
21. glede na postopek odločanja in odgovore na vprašalnik sodišča o tej zadevi dejstvo, da element ni opredeljen kot eden glavnih treh dejavnikov za odločitev, ne pomeni, da ni bil upoštevan ali je da bil zapostavljen.
37 22. Under article 5 of the fafa, the Un is obliged to provide the commission with details of contracting arrangements and is asked to ensure that this should not lead to increased costs over direct implementation. the commission considers that the case mentioned is not substantiated as leading to increased cost over direct implementation. however, the commission will ensure that it receives this information from the Un organisation for the case mentioned when the final report in respect of the action is presented and, if not satisfied that article 5 has been complied with, will consider appropriate corrective measures, possibly including a recovery order against the Un organisation. in the case of humanitarian aid, the commission only supports direct costs of the intermediary. these may include payments to other organisations. the payments made by the Un must be in line with its normal procedures, for activities directly related to the project and be in the timeframe given by the project objectives. 
15/2009 - Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje 37 22. v skladu s členom 5 FaFa morajo zn zagotoviti komisiji podrobne podatke o pogodbenih ureditvah in od njih se zahteva, da zagotovijo, da stroški zaradi tega niso višji kot pri neposrednem izvajanju. komisija meni, da pri navedenem primeru ni utemeljeno, da so stroški višji kot pri neposrednem izvajanju. vendar bo komisija zagotovila, da od organizacije zn prejme te informacije za zadevni primer, ko bo končno poročilo glede ukrepa predstavlje-no; če bo menila, da se člen 5 ni upošteval, bo razmislila o ustreznih korektivnih ukrepih, tudi o možnem nalogu za izterjavo, naslovljenem na organizacijo zn. v primeru humanitarne pomoči komisija podpira le neposredne stroške posrednika.
23. the context in which aid is delivered in sudan is particularly complex and difficult. 
23. okvir, v katerem se pomoč dostavlja v su-dan, je še zlasti zapleten in težaven.
Without adequate transport, storage and handling, there is a risk that the food would be damaged or not arrive at the final beneficiaries. southern sudan and darfur are two regions where infrastructure is very poor, the private sector inexistent and qualified staff very difficult to find and very expensive. all this results in support costs being higher than what might be considered usual in other places. this implies that enhanced supervision is needed. such costs are direct costs according to the first indent of article 3.2 of the fafa. rEplY of thE commission the commission funds the support costs in so far as they are costs incurred directly related to the provision of humanitarian aid. 
Brez primernega prevoza, skladiščenja in ravnanja obstaja tveganje, da bi se hrana pokvarila ali da ne bi prispela do končnih upravičencev. južni sudan in darfur sta regiji z zelo slabo infrastrukturo, zasebnega sektorja ni, usposobljeno osebje pa je težko najti in je zelo drago. zaradi vsega tega so stroški višji kot običajno v drugih krajih. To pomeni, da je potreben okrepljen nadzor. Taki stroški so neposredni stroški v skladu s prvo alineo člena 3(2) FaFa. odgovori komisijE komisija financira podporne stroške, če so to stroški, ki nastanejo neposredno pri zagotavljanju humanitarne pomoči.
24. in addition to the example of food transported, cited by the court, the commission channels aid through the Un in other areas where the capacity of the Un to deliver quickly is well known, in particular post crisis and rehabilitation. the Evaluation of the Commission's external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family cites positive examples of funds channelled through the Un in crisis or post-crisis situations, where the attributes of the Un (e.g. neutrality, expertise, field presence) were instrumental in ensuring that Ec assistance reached beneficiaries. the Eamrs have been adapted to highlight those programmes where delays occur so as initiate remedial action. thus, such experiences feed into the decision-making process. special report no 15/2009 - EU assistance implemented through United nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring 
24. Poleg primera prevoza hrane, ki ga navaja sodišče, komisija posreduje pomoč prek zn na drugih področjih, kjer je zmogljivost zn za hitro dostavo dobro znana, zlasti v času po krizi in pri sanaciji. Ocena zunanjega sodelovanja Komisije z državami partnericami prek organizacij družine ZN navaja pozitivne primere sredstev, ki so bila posredovana prek zn v kriznih razmerah in razmerah po krizi, pri katerih so lastnosti zn (npr. nevtralnost, stro-kovnost, prisotnost na terenu itd.) bistvene za zagotovitev, da pomoč Es doseže upravičence.
38 Box 1 — Examples of slow implementation of aid it is true that implementation of the interim disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration programme (iddrp) managed by a Un organisation in sudan was delayed. however, until June 2008 this was largely due to the lack of political will on the part of the signatories to the cpa (comprehensive peace agreement). this was a factor beyond the Un organisation’s control, and is also why the delegation and the government of sudan agreed to an extension of the project until June 2009 without additional costs. however, although the disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration process kicked off after June 2008, there were still some additional delays. the second extension focused on concrete and clearly visible activities. the remaining original activities which, for political reasons, could not be implemented by the end of June 2009 are being financed by other donors. the slowness of implementation of the iddrp has been regularly raised with the Un organisation. the challenging context of south sudan must be factored in. 
38 Okvir 1 — Primeri počasnega izvajanja pomoči res je, da se je izvajanje začasnega programa za razorožitev, demobilizacijo in ponovno vključevanje (iddrP), ki jih je vodila organizacija zn v sudanu, zavleklo. Toda do junija 2008 je bil vzrok za to zlasti pomanjkanje politične volje na strani podpisnic sPs (splošni mirovni sporazum). To je bil dejavnik, ki ga organizacija zn ni mogla nadzorovati, in ravno zato sta se delegacija in sudanska vlada dogovorili o podaljšanju projekta do junija 2009 brez dodatnih stroškov. čeprav so se procesi za razorožitev, demobilizacijo in ponovno vključevanje začeli po juniju 2008, je še vedno prihajalo do dodatnih zamud. drugo podaljšanje je bilo osredotočeno na konkretne in jasno vidne dejavnosti.
With regard to the construction of the legal offices, while it is true that the partner underperformed, it would be incorrect to lay the blame entirely on them but also on partly obstructive beneficiaries. the delegation has followed up this project closely and when it became apparent that implementation was not only progressing slowly but that the options submitted by the partner for an extension would lead to a substantial reduction in the scope of works, the decision was taken not to endorse the request. rEplY of thE commission the camp development project had two components: a socioeconomic survey of palestinian refugees in all fields and the camp development component. 
Preostale začetne dejavnosti, ki jih iz političnih razlogov ni bilo mogoče izvesti do konca junija 2009, financirajo drugi donatorji. o počasnem izvajanju iddrP se je v organizaciji zn redno razpravljalo. odgovori komisijE Projekt izgradnje tabora je imel dve komponenti: družbeno-gospodarsko raziskavo palestinskih beguncev na vseh področjih in komponento izgradnje tabora. obe komponenti sta bili medsebojno povezani.
Both components were interrelated. the first task was highly complex and took longer to complete than anticipated. reconstruction is a sensitive issue as it can be seen as compromising the right to return and considerable time was spent by the Un organisation to explain the approach to refugees and to get them on board. the Un organisation was granted the flexibility to fulfil the objectives of the programme due to the importance of the outputs of the initiative and to enable it to institutionalise this fundamental approach within its camp development programme and department serving millions of refugees in the occupied palestinian territory, syria, Jordan and lebanon. 
Prva naloga je bila izrazito zahtevna in za njeno dokončanje je bilo potrebno dlje časa, kot je bilo predvideno. obnova je občutljivo vprašanje, saj jo je mogoče razumeti kot ogrožanje pravice do vr-nitve; organizacija zn je porabila veliko časa, da je razložila pristop beguncem in da so v to privolili. organizaciji zn je bila zagotovljena prožnost pri doseganju ciljev programa, in sicer zaradi pomena rezultatov pobude in da se ji omogoči institucionalizacija tega temeljnega pristopa v okviru programa za izgradnjo tabora in oddelka, ki služi milijonom beguncem na zasedenih palestinskih ozemljih, v siriji, jordaniji in libanonu.
25. the commission has made huge efforts in recent years to ensure that contributions through the Un receive appropriate visibility and that the results of community interventions are communicated widely. the Un is aware of its obligations under the fafa and has committed itself at the highest level to ensure that the letter and spirit of these provisions are respected. Joint visibility guidelines were adopted and included in the communication and Visibility manual for EU External actions in april 2008. these initiatives and commitments combine to ensure that the Ec receives appropriate visibility when partnering with the Un. special report no 15/2009 - EU assistance implemented through United nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring 
25. komisija si je v zadnjih letih zelo prizadevala, da se prispevkom zn zagotovi ustrezna prepoznavnost in da se o rezultatih intervencij skupnosti obsežno poroča. zn se zavedajo svojih obveznosti v okviru FaFa in so se na najvišji ravni obvezali, da zagotovijo, da se namen in duh teh določb spoštujeta. aprila 2008 so bile sprejete skupne smernice o prepoznavnosti, ki so bile vključene v Priročnik o sporočanju in prepoznavnosti za zunanje ukrepe Eu. Te pobude in zaveze skupaj zagotavljajo, da ima Es pri partnerstvu z zn ustrezno prepoznavnost. upoštevati je treba zahtevni okvir južnega sudana. kar zadeva izgradnjo pravnih uradov, je sicer res, da se partner ni dovolj izkazal, vendar bi bilo neupravičeno zvaliti vso krivdo nanj, saj so delno krivi tudi upravičenci, ki so ovirali delovanje. delegacija je pozorno spremljala ta projekt in ko je postalo očitno, da izvajanje napreduje počasi, pa tudi, da bi možnosti, ki jih je predlagal partner za podaljšanje, pomenile bistveno zmanjšanje obsega del, je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se zahteva ne potrdi. Posebno poročilo št.
39 feedback from delegations through their regular reporting shows that this issue is being addressed at field level and efforts are also made to ensure that information from the field is communicated to an EU audience. in general, the conclusions of verification missions are also positive in relation to visibility. in addition the Un itself has, since 2006, prepared an annual partnership report, which presents the results of the Un–EU partnership in development and humanitarian cooperation to a wide audience. 
15/2009 - Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje 39 Povratne informacije delegacij v okviru njihovega rednega poročanja kažejo, da se to vprašanje obravnava na kraju samem, skuša pa se tudi zagotoviti, da se informacije s terena sporočajo javnosti Eu. na splošno so zaključki glede misij za preverjanje, kar zadeva prepoznavnost, prav tako pozitivni.
26. the instructions issued by Europeaid to delegation staff ensure that any proposal to channel funds through an international organisation is backed up with a clear written justification. these instructions require them to record their assessment, when identifying proposals for financing through the Un, of the added value of this approach and to take account of alternatives and cost-effectiveness issues. furthermore, the commission carries out an evaluation of both partners and projects where the efficiency and effectiveness of aid delivery is examined. these evaluations are publicly available. rEplY of thE commission 28. the financial regulation foresees the possibility of member states providing contributions directly to the commission's budget when allowed by the legal base. 
Poleg tega sami zn od leta 2006 pripravljajo letna poročila o partnerstvu, ki širši javnosti predstavljajo rezultate partnerstva med zn in Eu na področju razvoja in humanitarnega sodelovanja. 26. navodila, ki jih je Europeaid dal osebju delegacij, zagotavljajo, da je vsak predlog za posredovanje sredstev prek mednarodne organizacije jasno pisno utemeljen. na podlagi teh navodil mora osebje pri določanju predlogov za financiranje prek zn zabeležiti svojo oceno dodane vrednosti tega pristopa in upoštevati alternative ter vidike stroškovne učinkovitosti.
32. in June 2009, the terms of reference in use to conduct the compliance assessment exercise were modified and now provide for an assessment of how the entity controls the systems of other entities where it uses procedures other than its own (e.g. local systems of the beneficiary country or of the implementing body) to implement projects/programmes. When conferring a task to a Un agency, the commission, in accordance with the financial regulation, uses joint management as the mode of operation. this results in the Un agency using its procedures for the implementation of humanitarian aid. the Un agency may confine some implementation tasks to other parties acting under the Un's responsibility. in the case cited, the output achieved was the added value in terms of the Un organisation coordinating the emergency response which involved many other actors. 
32. junija 2009 so bile smernice, ki se uporabljajo za oceno skladnosti, spremenjene in zdaj predvidevajo oceno, kako subjekt kontrolira sisteme ostalih subjektov, kadar za izvajanje projektov/programov uporablja postopke drugih (npr. lokalni sistemi države upravičenke ali izvedbenega telesa). komisija pri prenosu naloge na agencijo zn v skladu s Finančno uredbo uporablja skupno upravljanje kot način delovanja. zato agencija zn uporablja svoje postopke za izvedbo humanitarne pomoči. agencija zn lahko zaupa nekatere izvedbene naloge drugim stranem, ki delujejo v pristojnosti zn. v navedenem primeru je doseženi rezultat pomenil dodano vrednost, saj so zn usklajevali odziva na nesrečo, ki je vključeval več drugih akterjev.
33. the commission recognises that the quality and timing of Un reporting is not optimal. this matter continually receives commission attention and reporting is also addressed in the instruction issued by Europeaid to delegations already mentioned. regarding humanitarian aid, please see reply to paragraph 48. 27. for humanitarian aid, the commission will ensure a better documentation of the alternatives and complementarities considered. special report no 15/2009 - EU assistance implemented through United nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring 
33. komisija priznava, da kakovost in čas poročanja zn nista optimalna. komisija temu vprašanju še vedno posveča pozornost, poročanje pa je vključeno tudi v navodila, ki jih je Europeaid dal delegacijam, kot je že navedeno. Posebno poročilo št. 15/2009 - Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje