natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EN EN 106 Visibility is the result of a continuous process of communication and calls for a differentiated approach according to the context. 
106 Prepoznavnost je rezultat nepretrganega postopka komunikacije in zahteva diferenciran pristop glede na okoliščine.
The financing agreements for BS and other external actions already include provisions requiring visibility. 
Sporazumi o financiranju za proračunsko podporo in drugi zunanji ukrepi že vsebujejo določbe, ki zahtevajo prepoznavnost.
Visibility was minimal only in 2016. 
Prepoznavnost je bila minimalna le leta 2016.
Since 2017 the visibility of EU support has considerably strengthened. 
Od leta 2017 se je prepoznavnost podpore EU močno izboljšala.
Like for the signature of the initial financing agreement, the incentive for performance does not start with the signature of an addendum. 
Tako kot velja za podpis prvotnega sporazuma o financiranju, se tudi spodbuda za uspešnost ne začne s podpisom dodatka.
The addendum is the result of dialogue and negotiations, which have been carried out for months before the addendum is actually signed. 
Dodatek je rezultat dialoga in pogajanj, ki so potekala več mesecev, preden je bil dodatek dejansko podpisan.
Further detailed explanations of the Commission position are given in the comments to the relevant paragraphs (see Commission replies to paragraphs 89 to 92). 
Nadaljnja podrobna pojasnila stališča Komisije so navedena v pripombah k zadevnim odstavkom (glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 89 do 92).
Recommendation 6 Đ Increase visibility of EU support The Commission and the EEAS partially accept the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 6 – Povečanje prepoznavnosti podpore EU Komisija in ESZD delno sprejemata priporočilo.
Introducing specific disbursement conditions regarding visibility would not be appropriate and might prove counter-productive in some cases, such as during the period of difficult relations between Morocco and the EU. 
Uvedba posebnih pogojev za izplačilo v zvezi s prepoznavnostjo ne bi bila ustrezna in bi se lahko v določenih primerih izkazala za neproduktivno, na primer v obdobju zapletenih odnosov med Marokom in EU.
107 The Commission considers that Gender and Human Rights are complex entrenched societal challenges that require time to bring about progress. 
107 Komisija meni, da sta enakost spolov in človekove pravice kompleksna, zakoreninjena družbena izziva, v zvezi s katerima je za dosego napredka potreben čas.
Using highly integrated long-term impact indicators (such as HDI or Gender Inequality Index) is inappropriate to measure impact of a BS programme over such a short time period. 
Uporaba zelo uveljavljenih dolgoročnih kazalnikov učinka (kot je indeks človekovega razvoja ali indeks neenakosti med spoloma) ni primerna za merjenje učinka programa proračunske podpore v tako kratkem obdobju.
Moreover, it should be noted that both HDI and the Gender Equality Index are improving in Morocco. 
Poleg tega je treba poudariti, da se v Maroku izboljšujeta indeks človekovega razvoja in indeks neenakosti med spoloma.
Further detailed explanations of the Commission position are given in the comments to the relevant paragraphs (see Commission replies to paragraphs 96 to 100). 20 
Nadaljnja podrobna pojasnila stališča Komisije so navedena v pripombah k zadevnim odstavkom (glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 96 do 100).
Audit team The ECAŐs special reports set out the results of its audits of EU policies and programmes, or of management-related topics from specific budgetary areas. 
Revizijska ekipa Posebna poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča predstavljajo rezultate njegovih revizij politik in programov EU ali tem v zvezi z upravljanjem na posameznih področjih proračuna.
The ECA selects and designs these audit tasks to maximise impact by considering the risks to performance or compliance, the level of income or spending involved, forthcoming developments and political and public interest. 
Sodišče izbira in načrtuje revizijske naloge tako, da je njihov učinek kar največji, in pri tem upošteva tveganje za smotrnost ali skladnost, višino ustreznih prihodkov ali porabe, prihodnji razvoj ter politični in javni interes.
This performance audit was carried out by Audit Chamber III, External actions/Security and justice, headed by ECA Member Bettina Jakobsen. 
To revizijo smotrnosti je opravil revizijski senat III – zunanji ukrepi, varnost in pravica –, ki mu predseduje članica Evropskega računskega sodišča Bettina Jakobsen.
The audit was led by ECA Member Hannu Takkula, supported by Turo Hentila, Head of Private Office; Helka Nykaenen, Private Office Attach; Kim Hubl, Head of Task; and Aurlia Petliza and Dirk Neumeister, Auditors. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Hannu Takkula, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njegovega kabineta Turo Hentila, atašejka v njegovem kabinetu Helka Nykaenen, vodja naloge Kim Hublé ter revizorji Aurélia Petliza in Dirk Neumeister.
This audit assessed the effectiveness of EU budget support to Morocco from 2014 to 2018. 
Sodišče je s to revizijo ocenjevalo uspešnost proračunske podpore EU Maroku v obdobju 2014–2018.
It covered budget support in the sectors in the health, social protection, justice and private sector development, looking at management by the Commission and evaluating the achievement of objectives. 
V okviru revizije, ki je zajemala proračunsko podporo v sektorjih zdravstva, socialne zaščite, pravosodja in razvoja zasebnega sektorja, je pregledalo, kako je Komisija upravljala proračunsko podporo, in ovrednotilo doseganje ciljev.
The Commission considered budget support to be the right choice of aid delivery instrument. 
Komisija je menila, da je proračunska podpora ustrezen instrument za zagotavljanje pomoči.
However, we concluded that its added value and ability to support reforms was limited due to sub-optimal focus, weak implementation and insufficient monitoring. 
Sodišče pa je ugotovilo, da ima nizko dodano vrednost in ne more dobro podpirati reform, in sicer zaradi neoptimalne osredotočenosti, neustreznega izvajanja in nezadostnega spremljanja.
The main weaknesses related to indicator design and results assessment. 
Glavne slabosti so se nanašale na zasnovo kazalnikov in ocenjevanje rezultatov.
We have therefore made recommendations on focusing support in fewer sectors, improving indicator design, enhancing the control procedures for disbursement and strengthening the policy dialogue. 
Sodišče je zato pripravilo priporočila v zvezi z osredotočenjem podpore na manj sektorjev, izboljšanjem zasnove kazalnikov in kontrolnih postopkov za izplačila ter krepitvijo dialoga o politikah.
ECA special report pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU. 
Posebno poročilo Sodišča v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU.
EN 2019 Special Report NO 13 The ethical frameworks of the audited EU institutions: scope for improvement (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
13 Posebno poročilo SL 2019 Etične okvire revidiranih institucij EU bi bilo mogoče še izboljšati (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
Specific anti-harassment policies for cases involving Members of the Parliament 75 Clear wording of the anti-harassment policies for staff 76 The survey results present a mixed picture of staff awareness and perception of ethics matters 77-85 Conclusions and recommendations 86-90 Annexes Annex I — Main characteristics of the existing ethical frameworks Part A – Gifts and entertainment Part B – Outside activities and assignments Part C – Conflicts of interests (CoI) upon recruitment, ad-hoc CoI and CoI in relation to spouse’s activities Part D – Post-EU employment and mandate Part E – Anti-harassment Part F – Whistleblowing Annex II — Results of the survey Acronyms and abbreviations Glossary Replies of the Parliament Replies of the Council Replies of the Commission Audit team 3 
Specifične politike proti nadlegovanju za primere, ki vključujejo poslance Parlamenta 75 Jasna ubeseditev politik proti nadlegovanju za uslužbence 76 Rezultati ankete kažejo mešano sliko tega, kako dobro uslužbenci poznajo etične zadeve in kako jih dojemajo 77–85 Zaključki in priporočila 86–90 Prilogi Priloga I – Glavne značilnosti obstoječih etičnih okvirov Del A – Darila in pogostitev Del B – Zunanje dejavnosti in naloge Del C – Nasprotje interesov pri zaposlovanju, ad hoc nasprotje interesov in nasprotje interesov v zvezi z dejavnostmi zakonca Del D – Obdobje po prenehanju zaposlitve in mandata v institucijah EU Del E – Boj proti nadlegovanju Del F – Prijavljanje nepravilnosti Priloga II – Rezultati ankete Kratice in okrajšave Glosar Odgovori Parlamenta Odgovori Sveta Odgovori Komisije Revizijska ekipa 3
Executive summary I Ethical conduct in public affairs means that civil servants and public office holders should serve the public interest, manage public resources properly, and make fair decisions. 
Povzetek I Etično ravnanje v javnih zadevah pomeni, da morajo javni uslužbenci in tisti, ki opravljajo javno funkcijo, služiti javnemu interesu, ustrezno upravljati javna sredstva in sprejemati poštene odločitve.
It contributes to sounder financial management and increased public trust, which is indispensable if public policies are to succeed. 
To prispeva k boljšemu finančnemu poslovodenju in večjemu zaupanju javnosti, ki sta nujna za uspeh javnih politik.
Any unethical behaviour by staff and Members of the European Union (EU) institutions and bodies attracts high levels of public interest and reduces trust in the EU. 
Vsako neetično vedenje uslužbencev in članov ali poslancev institucij in organov Evropske unije (EU) pritegne velik interes javnosti in zmanjša zaupanje v EU.
This is why it is so important for the institutions to put in place adequate ethical frameworks to ensure that the risk of unethical behaviour is reduced to a minimum. 
Zato je tako pomembno, da institucije vzpostavijo ustrezne etične okvire in tako zagotovijo, da se tveganje neetičnega vedenja zmanjša na najnižjo možno raven.
II Our audit assessed whether the ethical frameworks of the audited EU institutions were well established. 
II Pri reviziji je bilo ocenjeno, ali so etični okviri revidiranih institucij EU dobro uveljavljeni.
It covered all the levels of staff and Members of the following institutions: the European Parliament (Parliament), the Council of the European Union and the European Council (Council) and the European Commission (Commission). 
V revizijo so bile zajete vse ravni uslužbencev in članov naslednjih institucij: Evropskega parlamenta (Parlament), Sveta Evropske unije in Evropskega sveta (Svet) ter Evropske komisije (Komisija).
We also performed a survey to assess awareness of the ethical framework among the staff of these institutions. 
Sodišče je med uslužbenci teh institucij opravilo tudi anketo, da bi ocenilo njihovo poznavanje etičnega okvira.
We did not assess how the ethical frameworks had been implemented. III We concluded that, to a large extent, the audited institutions had established adequate ethical frameworks with room for improvement. 
Izvajanja etičnega okvira ni ocenilo. III Sodišče je prišlo do zaključka, da so revidirane institucije večinoma vzpostavile ustrezne etične okvire, ki pa bi jih bilo mogoče še izboljšati.
We found that in the Council there is no common ethical framework governing the work of the representatives of Member States. 
Ugotovilo je, da Svet nima skupnega etičnega okvira, ki bi urejal delo predstavnikov držav članic.
IV Our audit identified some weaknesses (not all of which are applicable in each of the audited institutions) with regard to: o overall strategies on ethics (Parliament and Council), o formalising procedures for checks on declarations and developing clearer guidance on the assessment criteria for staff (Parliament, Council and Commission), o enhancing the scrutiny of Members’ declarations by establishing a written standard procedure (Parliament and Commission), o gifts and entertainment policies (Parliament, Council and Commission), o whistleblowing (Parliament), and o post-mandate provisions (Parliament). 4 
IV Pri reviziji, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, so bile ugotovljene nekatere slabosti (od katerih se vse ne nanašajo na vse revidirane institucije) v zvezi: o s splošnimi strategijami na področju etike (Parlament in Svet), o s formalizacijo postopkov za preverjanje izjav in pripravo jasnejših smernic o merilih za ocenjevanje za uslužbence (Parlament, Svet in Komisija), o z okrepitvijo pregledov izjav članov ali poslancev tako, da se uvede standardni pisni postopek (Parlament in Komisija), o s politiko glede daril in pogostitve (Parlament, Svet in Komisija), o s prijavljanjem nepravilnosti (Parlament) ter o z določbami glede obdobja po preteku mandata (Parlament) Sodišče je odkrilo tudi področja, na katerih bi bilo za etične okvire koristno, če bi se medinstitucionalno uskladili (npr. zunanje dejavnosti uslužbencev ter izjave o dejavnostih zakoncev in partnerjev članov ali poslancev), pa tudi primere dobre prakse. 4
V We carried out a survey on a representative sample of staff in the audited institutions. 
V Sodišče je izvedlo anketo na reprezentativnem vzorcu uslužbencev revidiranih institucij.
Even though around half of the staff members assess their knowledge of the ethical framework as good or very good, the survey results present a mixed picture with regard to the staff awareness and perception of ethical matters. 
Čeprav je približno polovica uslužbencev svoje poznavanje etičnega okvira ocenila kot dobro ali zelo dobro, rezultati ankete kažejo mešano sliko tega, kako dobro uslužbenci poznajo etične zadeve in kako jih dojemajo.
The results, however, vary between the institutions and the categories of staff. 
Toda rezultati se med institucijami in kategorijami uslužbencev razlikujejo.
VI We present recommendations to help the audited institutions to: o improve their ethical frameworks, o work together to harmonise the elements of their ethical frameworks and make further efforts to share good practice on the ethical matters, and o improve staff awareness and perception of the ethical framework and culture. 5 
VI Sodišče predstavlja priporočila za pomoč revidiranim institucijam pri: o izboljšanju njihovih etičnih okvirov, o sodelovanju za uskladitev elementov njihovih etičnih okvirov in nadaljnjih prizadevanjih za izmenjavo dobre prakse o etičnih zadevah ter o izboljšanju tega, kako dobro uslužbenci poznajo etični okvir in kulturo ter kako ju dojemajo. 5
Introduction 01 Ethical conduct in public affairs means that civil servants and public office holders should serve the public interest, manage public resources properly, and make fair decisions. 
Uvod 01 Etično ravnanje v javnih zadevah pomeni, da morajo javni uslužbenci in tisti, ki opravljajo javno funkcijo, služiti javnemu interesu, ustrezno upravljati javna sredstva in sprejemati poštene odločitve.
It contributes to sounder financial management and increased public trust, which is indispensable for public policies to succeed. 
Prispeva k boljšemu finančnemu poslovodenju in večjemu zaupanju javnosti, ki sta nujna za uspeh javnih politik.
02 The “integrity management framework” introduced by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) “brings together instruments, processes, and structures for fostering integrity and preventing corruption in public organisations”1. 
02 Okvir za upravljanje integritete, ki ga je uvedla Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD), združuje instrumente, procese in strukture za spodbujanje integritete in preprečevanje korupcije v javnih organizacijah1.
According to the OECD Recommendation on Public Integrity, public integrity refers to the consistent alignment of, and adherence to, shared ethical values, principles and norms for upholding and prioritising the public interest over private interests in the public sector2. 
Glede na priporočilo OECD o javni integriteti se javna integriteta nanaša na dosledno usklajevanje in upoštevanje skupnih etičnih vrednot, načel in norm za dajanje prednosti javnemu interesu in njegovo spodbujanje pred zasebnimi interesi v javnem sektorju2.
The OECD framework 03 The OECD’s principles for managing ethics in the public sector3 describe an “ethics infrastructure” that public institutions ought to have in place. 
Okvir OECD 03 V načelih OECD za upravljanje etike v javnem sektorju3 je opisana „infrastruktura etike”, ki bi jo morale vzpostaviti javne institucije.
This “ethics infrastructure” comprises three main elements: guidance, management and control. 
Ta infrastruktura etike zajema tri glavne elemente: smernice, upravljanje in nadzor.
04 The OECD has drawn up a model for the closely related concept of public integrity (see Figure 1). 
04 OECD je pripravila model za sorodni pojem javne integritete (glej sliko 1).
6 1 2 3 Integrity framework, OECD, 2009. 
6 1 2 Integrity framework, OECD, 2009.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Recommendation on Public Integrity, OECD, Paris, 2017. 
Priporočilo Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj o javni integriteti, OECD, Pariz, 2017.
“1998 Recommendation of the OECD Council on Improving Ethical Conducting the Public Service, including Principles for Managing Ethics in the Public Service”, in OECD, Trust in Government. 
1998 Recommendation of the OECD Council on Improving Ethical Conducting the Public Service, including Principles for Managing Ethics in the Public Service, OECD, Trust in Government.
Ethics measures in OECD Countries, Paris, 2000. 
Ethics measures in OECD Countries, Pariz, 2000.
Figure 1 – Building blocks of public integrity Responsibilities PUBLIC INTEGRITY Commitment Capacity building Openness Risk management System Strategy Standards Accountability Enforcement © OECD Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity, 2017. 
Odgovornosti Sistem Strategija Standardi © priporočilo sveta OECD o javni integriteti, 2017 Celotna družba Vodenje Kultura Ocenjevanje na podlagi dosežkov 7
The EU context 06 Any unethical behaviour by staff and Members of European Union (EU) institutions and bodies is unacceptable. 
Okvir EU 06 Vsako neetično vedenje uslužbencev in članov ali poslancev institucij in organov Evropske unije (EU) je nesprejemljivo.
Such behaviour – even if it is only alleged – attracts high levels of public interest and reduces trust in the EU. 
Tako vedenje, pa čeprav samo domnevno, pritegne velik interes javnosti in zmanjša zaupanje v EU.
Unethical behaviour is also linked to the risk of corruption and fraud. 
Neetično vedenje je povezano tudi s tveganjem korupcije in goljufij.
An assessment of the implementation of the ethical frameworks in the EU institutions can help to manage these risks. 
Ocena izvajanja etičnih okvirov v institucijah EU lahko pripomore k obvladovanju teh tveganj.
07 The institutions should put in place adequate ethical frameworks to ensure that the risks of unethical behaviours are reduced to a minimum level. 
07 Institucije bi morale vzpostaviti ustrezne etične okvire in tako zagotoviti, da se tveganja neetičnega vedenja zmanjšajo na najnižjo možno raven.
The main risk is that without appropriate ethical frameworks, the unethical behaviour in the institutions is not prevented, identified and dealt with correctly. 
Glavno tveganje je, da se brez ustreznih etičnih okvirov neetično vedenje v institucijah ne bi preprečevalo, ugotavljalo in pravilno obravnavalo.
This may result in reputational damage to the image of the EU and its institutions. 
To bi lahko škodovalo ugledu podobe EU in njenih institucij.
EU legislation does not contain any statutory definition of an ethical framework as such; however, many provisions of both primary and secondary law can be construed as ethical obligations. 
Zakonodaja EU ne vsebuje zakonske opredelitve etičnega okvira kot takega, vendar pa je številne določbe iz primarne in tudi sekundarne zakonodaje mogoče razumeti kot etične obveznosti.
08 While there are common provisions applicable to all of the EU institutions, there are also different specific legal ethical requirements for each EU institution, for the Directorates-General (DGs) of the European Commission (Commission), and for staff and Members of the EU institutions. 
08 Poleg skupnih določb, ki se uporabljajo za vse institucije EU, obstajajo tudi različne specifične etične pravne zahteve za posamezne institucije, generalne direktorate (GD) Evropske komisije (Komisija) ter uslužbence in člane ali poslance institucij EU.
The specific provisions reflect different roles, responsibilities and risks. 
Specifične določbe odražajo različne vloge, odgovornosti in tveganja.
09 The starting point for all the obligations is represented by the founding Treaties, which contain provisions laying down the aspirational values which should guide the conduct of staff and Members of EU institutions an bodies. 
09 Izhodišče za vse obveznosti predstavljata ustanovni pogodbi, ki vsebujeta določbe o zaželenih vrednotah, ki naj bi usmerjale ravnanje uslužbencev in članov ali poslancev institucij in organov EU.
These provisions bear a certain degree of similarity in the terminology they use and in the spirit of the obligations they set out, but the categories of individuals concerned are of course quite different, so it is necessary to address each of these categories specifically. 
Za terminologijo, ki se v teh določbah uporablja, in duh obveznosti, ki so v njih določene, je značilna določena stopnja podobnosti, vendar se kategorije zadevnih posameznikov seveda precej razlikujejo, zato je treba obravnavati vsako posebej.
10 Table 1 gives a summary of how legal provisions apply to the staff and Members of the EU institutions. 8 
10 V tabeli 1 je povzetek pravnih določb, ki se uporabljajo za uslužbence in člane ali poslance institucij EU. 8
Table 1 – Legal provisions applicable to staff and Members of the EU institutions 9 STAFF MEMBERS Parliament Council Commission Parliament Council Commission Article 298 Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU): The European Parliament and the Council establish provisions for an open, efficient and independent European administration. Articles 6 and 7 of the Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) Article 339 TFEU also applicable to the Parliament National rules Article 339 TFEU also applicable to Council (not only at ministerial, but also national civil servant level) Article 17 of the Treaty of the European Union (TEU): Obligation of total independence for Commissioners (note: the report concerns ethical behaviour of persons, not of the institutions as such) Article 245 of the TFEU: independence; obligations arising from the function; obligations continuing after the end of mandate Article 339 of the TFEU on the duty not to disclose information of the kind covered by the obligation of professional secrecy Staff Regulations (Articles 11-22c)4 4 For staff members who are not officials, similar requirements are set out in the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants (CEOS). 
Tabela 1 – Pravne določbe, ki se uporabljajo za uslužbence in člane ali poslance institucij EU 9 USLUŽBENCI ČLANI Parlament Svet Komisija Parlament Svet Komisija člen 298 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU): Evropski parlament in Svet sprejmeta določbe za odprto, učinkovito in neodvisno upravo EU. člena 6 in 7 Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta člen 339 PDEU se uporablja tudi za Parlament nacionalna pravila člen 339 PDEU se uporablja tudi za Svet (ne le na ravni ministrov, temveč tudi nacionalnih javnih uslužbencev) člen 17 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU): obveznost popolne neodvisnosti komisarjev (opomba: poročilo zadeva etično vedenje oseb, ne institucij kot takih) člen 245 PDEU: neodvisnost; obveznosti, ki izvirajo iz funkcije; obveznosti, ki se nadaljujejo po koncu mandata člen 339 PDEU o dolžnosti nerazkritja tistih informacij, za katere velja obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti kadrovski predpisi (členi 11–22c)4 4 Za uslužbence, ki niso uradniki, so podobne zahteve določene v Pogojih za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev.
The institutions further detail these provisions by adopting more specific implementing rules. 
Institucije so te določbe podrobneje opredelile s sprejetjem bolj specifičnih izvedbenih pravil.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 
PRAVNE ZAHTEVE