natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3.31. The Court’s audit covered compliance with the provisions of the relevant regulations and an assessment of the effectiveness of the systems in ensuring regularity of trans­ actions. 
3.31 Sodišče je v revizijo zajelo skladnost z določbami ustreznih uredb in oceno uspešnosti sistemov pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti transakcij.
The following elements were examined: (I) Administrative procedures and controls to ensure correct payment including quality of databases. (II) Control systems based on on-the-spot checks. (III) Systems to ensure implementation and control of Cross-compliance. 
Pregledani so bili naslednji elementi: I) administrativni postopki in kontrole za zagotovitev pravilnega plačila, vključno s kakovostjo podatkovnih zbirk; II) kontrolni sistemi, ki temeljijo na pregledih na kraju samem; III) sistemi, ki zagotavljajo izvajanje in kontroliranje navz­ križne skladnosti.
3.32. While the IACS system is in principle well designed, the Court’s annual IACS systems audits carried out in recent years show that the effectiveness of IACS is adversely affected by inaccurate data in the databases, incomplete cross checks or incorrect or incomplete follow up of anomalies. 
3.32 Čeprav je sistem IAKS načeloma dobro zasnovan, se je pri letnih revizijah sistemov IAKS, ki jih izvaja Sodišče, v zadnjih letih pokazalo, da na uspešnost IAKS negativno vpli­ vajo netočni podatki v podatkovnih zbirkah, nepopolno navz­ križno preverjanje ali nepravilno ali nepopolno nadaljnje ukre­ panje v zvezi z odstopanji.
In respect of financial years 2006-2008 the Court examined the operation of IACS systems related to SPS or SAPS in 20 paying agencies in 17 Member States and reported the results in its Annual Reports. 
Sodišče je za proračunska leta 2006–2008 preučilo delovanje sistemov IAKS v zvezi s SEP ali SEPP v 20 plačilnih agencijah v 17 državah članicah in o rezultatih poročalo v svojih letnih poročilih.
For one paying agency IACS was assessed to be effective, for 12 partially effective and for seven, significant weaknesses were identified which led the Court to conclude that the system was not effective. _____________ (26) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 of 7 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures (OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 
IAKS je bil ocenjen kot uspešen pri eni plačilni agenciji, pri 12 kot delno uspešen, pri sedmih pa so bile ugotovljene pomembne slabosti, zaradi česar je Sodišče prišlo do zaključka, da sistem ni uspešen. _____________ (26) Uredba Komisija (ES) št. 1975/2006 z dne 7. decembra 2006 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.31. (III) The Commission recalls that respect of cross-compliance criteria by farmers does not constitute an eligibility criterion and, therefore, the controls of these criteria do not pertain to the legality and the regularity of the underlying transactions. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.31 III) Komisija opominja, da upoštevanje merila navzkrižne skladnosti s strani kmetov ni merilo za upravičenost in zato preverjanja teh meril niso povezana z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo osnovnih transakcij.
Farmers not respecting these criteria are entitled to receive payments, but are sanctioned on the basis of the severity, extent, permanence and repetition of the non-compliance found as well as negligence or intent of the beneficiary concerned. 3.32.-3.33. 
Kmetje, ki ne upoštevajo teh meril, so upravičeni do prejemanja plačil, vendar so kaznovani na podlagi resnosti, obsega, trajnosti in ponovitev ugotovljenih neskladnosti ter zaradi malomarnosti ali namere zadevnega upravičenca.
The Commission continues to consider that, as the Court acknowledged in previous annual reports since 2005, the IACS is generally an effective control system for limiting the risk of error or irregular expenditure, provided that it is properly applied. 
3.32–3.33 Komisija še naprej ugotavlja, kakor je Sodišče potrdilo v prejšnjih letnih poročilih od leta 2005 naprej, da je IAKS na splošno učinkovit kontrolni sistem za omejevanje tveganja napak ali nepravilnih odhodkov, če se uporablja pravilno.
The effectiveness and constant improvement of the IACS is confirmed by the results of the conformity audits which the Commission has carried out over the past years in all Member States but Luxembourg as well as by the low error rate indicated in the control statistics which it receives from Member States and which are verified and validated by the certification bodies. 
Učinkovitost in stalno izboljševanje IAKS potrjujejo rezultati revizij skladnosti, ki jih je Komisija v zadnjih letih izvajala v vseh državah članicah razen v Luksemburgu, ter nizka stopnja napak, navedena v kontrolnih statističnih podatkih, ki jih Komisija prejme od držav članic, certifikacijski organi pa jih preverijo in potrdijo.
This low error rate is also in line with that of the Court itself in its 2008 Annual Report. 
Ta nizka stopnja napak je skladna tudi s tisto, ki jo je Sodišče samo navedlo v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2008.
68 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.33. Forits2009auditofeightpayingagencies,theCourt found the systems to be effective in ensuring the regularity of payments in only one agency, partially effective in four agencies, and ineffective in the remaining three (Greece, Cyprus and Malta). 
68 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.33 Sodišče je pri svoji reviziji osmih plačilnih agencij leta 2009 ugotovilo, da je sistem pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti plačil uspešen samo pri eni agenciji, delno uspešen pri štirih, neuspešen pa pri ostalih treh (v Grčiji, na Cipru in Malti).
ConcerningtheeightRuralDevelopmentsupervisory and control systems audited, the Court found that three of the control systems implemented were effective and five of them were only partially effective in ensuring the regularity of payments. 
3.34 Zaosemrevidiranihnadzornihinkontrolnihsistemov v okviru razvoja podeželja je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so trije uvedeni kontrolni sistemi uspešni, pet pa jih je le delno uspešnih pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti plačil.
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S The Commission found that for claim year 2008, significant defi­ ciencies existed in the IACS in Bulgaria and Romania. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E Komisija je ugotovila, da je v letu oddaje zahtevkov 2008 prišlo do precejšnjih pomanjkljivosti pri IAKS v Bolgariji in Romuniji.
As a result these two Member States established action plans in 2009 which have been closely followed by the Commission. 
Ti dve državi članici sta zato leta 2009 vzpostavili akcijske načrte, ki jih Komisija skrbno spremlja.
Other Member States have deficiencies of a lesser nature in their IACS which do not render their systems ineffective but, rather, perfectible and for which they have taken or are taking action. 
Pri drugih državah članicah so bile ugotovljene manjše pomanjklji­ vosti v zvezi z njihovimi IAKS, vendar to še ne pomeni, da so njihovi sistemi neučinkoviti, temveč jih je treba le izboljšati, zato so že sprejeli oziroma sprejemajo ukrepe v tej smeri.
All these deficiencies are followed up through conformity clearance procedures which ensure that the risk to the EU budget is adequately covered. 3.34. 
Vse te pomanjkljivosti se spremljajo na podlagi postopkov potrditve skladnosti, kar omogoča, da je tveganje za proračun EU ustrezno pokrito.
The weaknesses of the rural development supervisory and control systems in Bulgaria and Romania are due to the deficiencies in the IACS, for which a reservation is included in the Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development’s Annual Activity Report for 2009. 
3.34 Slabosti nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov za razvoj pode­ želja v Bolgariji in Romuniji izhajajo iz pomanjkljivosti v IAKS, za katere je bil v letnem poročilu o dejavnosti Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja za leto 2009 izražen pridržek.
The control system for the other Member States audited by the Commission in 2009 was found to be effective. 
Kontrolni sistem za druge države članice, ki jih je Komisija revidirala v letu 2009, se je izkazal kot učinkovit.
However, there is scope for improvement for the following items: — Respect of general guidelines set out in the working document regarding agri-environment commitments and their verifiability, which notably provides that several control tools need to be used in combination; — Continued efforts are required to provide simple and clear eligi­ bility criteria and to inform beneficiaries about their obligations in a clear and unequivocal manner; — Application of exhaustive administrative controls, in particular as regards agri-environmental measures; — Improvement of quality of control reports to permit better tracea­ bility and clear conclusions of the controls carried out. 3.35. TheCourt’sprincipalauditfindingsareoutlinedinthe following paragraphs. 
Kljub temu se priporočajo izboljšave pri naslednjih točkah: — upoštevanje splošnih smernic, ki so opredeljene v delovnem doku­ mentu o kmetijsko-okoljskih zavezah in njihove preverljivosti, ki zlasti določa, da je treba uporabiti kombinacijo več nadzornih instrumentov, — potrebni so nenehni napori, da se zagotovijo enostavna in jasna merila za upravičenost ter da so upravičenci o svojih obveznostih obveščeni na jasen in nedvoumen način, — uporaba obširnih administrativnih kontrol, zlasti v zvezi s kmetijsko-okoljskimi ukrepi, — izboljšanje kakovosti poročil o kontroli, da se omogočijo boljša sledljivost in jasni sklepi v zvezi z opravljenimi kontrolami. 3.35 Glavne revizijske ugotovitve Sodišča so navedene v naslednjih odstavkih.
The results of the examination of systems are summarised in Annex 3.2. 
Rezultati preverjanja sistemov so povzeti v Prilogi 3.2.
(I) Administrative procedures and controls to ensure correct payment including quality of databases 3.36. Administrativechecksmustbeundertakenonall applications for support and payment claims, and cover all elements that are possible and appropriate to control by administrative means(27). 
I) Administrativni postopki in kontrole za zagotovitev pravil­ nega plačila, vključno s kakovostjo podatkovnih zbirk 3.36 Administrativnipreglediseopravijozavsezahtevkeza podporo in zahtevke za plačila ter zajemajo vse sestavne dele, ki jih je mogoče in primerno administrativno nadzorovati (27).
The administrative checks must include cross-checks wherever possible and appropriate, inter alia with data from the IACS databases. 
Kadar je to mogoče in primerno, morajo administrativni pregledi vključevati navzkrižna preverjanja, med drugim s podatki iz podatkovnih zbirk IAKS.
The Court’s audit verified whether the databases were complete and reliable as well as the adequacy of checks in identifying anomalies and taking corrective action. 
Sodišče je preverilo, ali so podatkovne zbirke popolne in zanesljive ter ali so pregledi primerni za ugotavljanje odstopanj in izvajanje popravnih ukrepov.
The most important systems weak­ nesses found are set out below. _____________ (27) Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 and Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. 
Najpomembnejše slabosti sistemov so navedene v nadaljevanju. _____________ (27) Člen 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 1975/2006 in člen 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004.
EN In general, the quality of the LPIS is constantly improving in the Member States, as also demonstrated by the Commission’s reply to the examples referred to by the Court below. 3.37. B 1. 9. 
SL 9.11.2010 UradnilistEvropskeunije 69 E K JS SL U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.37 Na splošno se kakovost LPIS v državah članicah stalno izboljšuje, kakor je razvidno tudi iz odgovora Komisije na primere, ki jih je Sodišče navedlo spodaj.
Moreover, as from claim year 2010 Member States are obliged to perform a quality assessment of the LPIS-GIS on an annual basis according to pre-determined procedures and to report on the results and the actions envisaged to, where required, improve the situation. 
Poleg tega morajo od leta oddaje zahtevkov 2010 države članice na letni ravni opraviti oceno kakovosti LPIS-GIS v skladu z vnaprej opredeljenimi postopki ter po potrebi poročati o rezultatih in predvidenih ukrepih za izboljšanje položaja.
The Commission accepts that there were problems with the Greek IACS in claim year 2008. 
Komisija se strinja, da so se v letu oddaje zahtevkov 2008 pojavile težave z grškim IAKS.
However the financial risk for the past is covered by the conformity clearance procedure by which, until now, some 866 million EUR has been or is being excluded from EU financing. 
Vendar je finančno tveganje za preteklost zajeto v postopku potrditve skladnosti, v katerem je bilo do zdaj iz financiranja EU izvzetih ali je v postopku izvzema približno 866 milijonov EUR.
The LPIS-GIS became available in accordance with the action plan at 31 December 2008 and the roll out was done prior to the start of the 2009 claim period. 
LPIS-GIS se je v skladu z akcijskim načrtom začel uporabljati 31. decembra 2008, postopno uvajanje pa je bilo opravljeno pred začetkom obdobja za oddajo zahtevkov 2009.
The problem in 2009 was caused by the late digitisation of parcels by farmers and measures have been taken to rectify the situation in the meantime by the fixation of a cut off date for the digitisation. 
V letu 2009 je težavo povzročila pozna digitalizacija parcel s strani kmetov, medtem pa so bili sprejeti ukrepi za izboljšanje položaja z določitvijo končnega roka za digitalizacijo.
The Commission is following up the deficiencies which have existed in the Lithuanian LPIS-GIS since 2005 through conformity clearance procedures. 
Komisija že od leta 2005 na podlagi postopkov potrditve skladnosti spremlja pomanjkljivosti, do katerih je prišlo v litovskem LPIS-GIS.
However, the Lithuanian authorities have meanwhile informed the Commission that corrective measures have been imple­ mented in the LPIS-GIS in December 2009. 
Litovski organi so medtem Komisijo že obvestili, da so decembra 2009 izvedli popravne ukrepe v LPIS-GIS.
The Commission has been following the deficiencies in the LPIS-GIS of Cyprus since 2005. 
Komisija že od leta 2005 spremlja pomanjkljivosti v ciprskem LPIS-GIS.
As a result of the missions carried out, Cyprus took remedial action so that as of 2009 the system is considered to be effective. 
Na podlagi opravljenih misij je Ciper sprejel ukrepe za izbolj­ šanje, zato se šteje, da je sistem od leta 2009 učinkovit.
The Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) is a database in which all the agricultural area (reference parcels) of the Member State is recorded. 
3.37 Identifikacijski sistem za zemljišča (LPIS) je podatkovna zbirka, v kateri so evidentirane vse kmetijske površine (refe­ renčne parcele) države članice.
The Court found significant defi­ ciencies of LPIS in three Member States that affect the effec­ tiveness of administrative cross checks as illustrated hereunder: Examples LPIS-GIS technology became mandatory in 2005. 
Sodišče je v treh državah članicah odkrilo pomembne pomanjkljivosti v LPIS, ki vplivajo na učinkovitost administrativnega navzkrižnega preverjanja, kot je prikazano v nadaljevanju: Primera Tehnologija LPIS-GIS je postala obvezna leta 2005.
In Greece until and including the claim year 2008 the LPIS-GIS did not contain any graphical information (ortho-photos) showing the actual eligible area of the reference parcels recorded. 
V Grčiji do vključno leta vložitve zahtevkov 2008 v LPIS-GIS ni bilo grafičnih informacij (orto-foto posnetkov), ki bi prikazovale dejanske upravičene površine evidentiranih referenčnih parcel.
LPIS-GIS was still not fully operational for carrying out the necessary cross-checks as of December 2009. 
LPIS-GIS še decembra 2009 ni deloval v celoti, da bi se lahko izvajali potrebni navzkrižni pregledi.
In Lithuania the Court found that the authorities failed to eliminate ineligible features of a total area of 13 700 ha from the eligible area of parcels recorded to be 100 % eligible in the LPIS. 
V Litvi je Sodišče ugotovilo, da pristojni organi iz površine parcel, ki je v LPIS evidentirana kot 100-odstotno upravičena, niso izločili neupravičenih delov v skupni površini 13 700 ha.
In Cyprus new ortho-photos were taken and analysed in 2008. 
Na Cipru so bili leta 2008 posneti in analizirani novi orto-foto posnetki.
The analysis showed that more than 39000 reference parcels were affected by changes of land use and as a result the area eligible to SAPS aid dropped by more than 7 000 ha (i.e. 5 % of the agricultural area). 
Pri analizi se je pokazalo, da so na več kot 39 000 referenčnih parcel vplivale spremembe v zvezi z rabo zemljišča, površina, upravičena do SEPP, pa se je zmanjšala za več kot 7 000 ha (tj. 5 % kmetijskih površin).
Although updated information was available, the Cypriot authorities decided to base payments for claim year 2008 on the outdated 2003 ortho-photos. 
Čeprav so bile na voljo posodobljene informacije, so ciprski organi kot osnovo za izračun plačil za leto vložitve zahtevkov 2008 uporabili zastarele orto-foto posnetke iz leta 2003.
EN 70 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanUnion 9.11.2010 T H E C O U R T ’ S O B S E R VA T I O N S 3.38. TheCourtalsofoundintwoMemberStates(Italy, Spain) that the most recent ortho-photos available were not used for capping the eligible areas for calculating the payments. 
SL 70 UradnilistEvropskeunije 9.11.2010 U G O T O V I T V E S O D I Š Č A 3.38 Sodišče je tudi za dve drugi državi članici (Italija, Španija) ugotovilo, da pri omejevanju upravičenih površin za izračun plačil niso bili uporabljeni najnovejši razpoložljivi orto-foto posnetki.
Nevertheless, the Commission considers it to be very useful that Member States make the ortho-photos available at an early stage to farmers for the claim process and for controllers for the on-the-spot-checks as it has been the case. 
Kljub temu Komisija meni, da je zelo koristno, da države članice že zgodaj zagotovijo orto-foto posnetke kmetom za postopek oddaje zahtevkov, prav tako pa nadzornikom, ki izvajajo preglede na kraju samem, kakor v tem primeru.
Member States are obliged to recover any amounts from previous years if over-declarations are detected afterwards as a result of updated ortho-photos. 
Države članice morajo vrniti vse zneske iz prejšnjih let, če se kot posledica posodobljenih orto-foto posnetkov naknadno odkrijejo previ­ soke prijave.
Where the Commission considers that a Member State is not sufficiently proactive in protecting the EU budget, it follows up the situation under the conformity clearance procedure. 
Če Komisija meni, da država članica ni dovolj proaktivna pri zaščiti proračuna EU, mora spremljati položaj v skladu s postopkom potrditve skladnosti.
This implies that new ortho-images will cover the whole country, that the images will be renewed every third year, and that the reference parcels will be systematically assessed, including field visits where necessary. 
To pomeni, da bodo novi orto-foto posnetki zajeli celotno državo in bodo osveženi vsaka tri leta, referenčne parcele pa bodo sistematično ocenjene, vključno z obiski na terenu, kjer bo to potrebno.
The Commission considers this approach to be a major step forward. 
Komisija meni, da je ta pristop velik korak naprej.
As regards Spain, the Court looked at imagery that had not yet been processed. 
V zvezi s Španijo je Sodišče pregledalo slikovni material, ki še ni bil obdelan.
This imagery was made available to farmers for their 2008 claim lodging. 
Ta slikovni material je bil dan na voljo kmetom za oddajo zahtevkov za leto 2008.
The Commission actively follows up the measures taken to rectify past over-declarations. 
Komisija aktivno spremlja ukrepe, ki so bili sprejeti za odpravo preteklih previsokih prijav.
3.39. For Cyprus, Greece and Slovakia, similar findings to the ones of the Court were included in the certification bodies’ reports for financial year 2009 and in all three cases the paying agencies replied that measures have been initiated to remedy the problems. 
3.39 Za Ciper, Grčijo in Slovaško so bile v poročila certifikacij­ skih organov za proračunsko leto 2009 vključene ugotovitve, podobne ugotovitvam Sodišča, v vseh treh primerih pa so plačilne agencije odgovorile, da so bili sproženi ukrepi za odpravo težav.
Member States have been reminded in the Agriculture Funds Committee to ensure full audit trail in their IT applications. 
V okviru Odbora za kmetijske sklade so bile države članice pozvane, da v svojih IT-aplikacijah zagotovijo popolno revizijsko sled.
Examples In Italy (Emilia Romagna) and Spain (Basque Country) the eligibility rate for poor pasture land is not based on the most recent information available (ortho-photos or on-the-spot inspection) but on what the farmer had claimed before SPS was introduced. 
Primera V Italiji (Emilija-Romanja) in Španiji (Baskija) stopnja upravičenosti za pašnike slabe kakovosti ne temelji na najnovejših informacijah, ki so na voljo (orto-foto posnetki ali pregledi na kraju samem), ampak na podatkih iz zahtevkov, ki so jih kmetje vložili pred uvedbo SEP.
In the cases examined, both Italian and Spanish farmers were allowed to claim the higher historical eligibility rate for poor pasture land which on the latest ortho-photos shows significantly lower eligibility rates. 
V pregledanih primerih so italijanski in španski kmetje lahko vložili zahtevek za višjo stopnjo zgodovinske upravičenosti za pašnike slabe kakovosti, ki so glede na najnovejše orto-foto posnetke upravičeni do precej nižje stopnje.
Differences have lead to granting aid for significantly more than the actual eligible area. 3.39. 
Razlike so privedle do dodeljevanja pomoči za površino, ki je bistveno večja od dejansko upravičene.
TheCourthasobservedinseveralMemberStates (Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Slovakia and Lithuania) that the claim database did not allow the nature and timing of modifications or corrections made to be identified. 
3.39 Sodišče je v več državah članicah (Ciper, Grčija, Italija, Slovaška in Litva) opazilo, da podatkovna zbirka zahtevkov ni omogočala ugotavljanja značilnosti in časovnega poteka izvedenih sprememb ali popravkov.
In the absence of a reliable audit trail the Court cannot assess the correct appli­ cation of EU penalties. 
Ker ni zanesljive revizijske sledi, Sodišče ne more oceniti pravilne uporabe kazni EU.
Examples In Greece the bulk of administrative cross checks and of the necessary corrections of the claim data is carried out under a procedure that leaves no audit trail and does not lead to the application of penalties. 
Primera V Grčiji se večina administrativnih navzkrižnih preverjanj in potrebnih popravkov podatkov iz zahtevkov izvaja s postopkom brez revizijske sledi, ki ne vodi do uporabe kazni.
In Cyprus conflicting information regarding dates and content of amendments of claims was shown on the paper claim and in the database. 
Na Cipru so bili v zahtevkih na papirju in v podatkovni zbirki navedeni nasprotujoči si podatki o datumih in vsebini sprememb.
Member States are also required to respect the overall national ceilings both for SPS and SAPS. 
Države članice morajo upoštevati tudi skupne nacionalne zgornje meje za SEP in SEPP.
The Court found a ceiling overshoot (Cyprus) although this did not affect the EU budget; and an inaccurate allocation of entitlements (Malta). 
Sodišče je ugotovilo prekoračitve zgornje meje (Ciper), kar sicer ni vpli­ valo na proračun EU, in netočno dodeljevanje pravic (Malta).
T H E C O M M I S S I O N ’ S R E P L I E S 3.40. Examples When Malta introduced SPS in 2007 all livestock or dairy farmers were allocated special entitlements including those who held eligible hectares which is contrary to EU legislation. 
O D G O VO R I KO M I S I J E 3.40 Primera Ko je Malta leta 2007 uvedla SEP, so bile vsem živinorejcem in pridelovalcem mleka dodeljene posebne pravice, vključno s tistimi, ki so imeli upravičene hektarje, kar je v nasprotju z zakonodajo EU.