natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was not designed to measure output, results or impact. 
Kazalnik ni bil zasnovan za merjenje izložkov, rezultatov ali učinka.
Horizon 2020 adds for the first time in legislation the requirement that private — as opposed to public — investment in research and development should account for two-thirds of the total (10). 
Obzorje 2020 v zakonodajo prvič uvaja zahtevo, da bi morali dve tretjini celote naložb v raziskave in razvoj tvoriti zasebne (in ne javne) naložbe (10).
Against these targets, in 2014 total such investment across Europe was just over 2 % of GDP, with the private sector accounting for around 64 % of this. 
Za primerjavo s temi cilji, leta 2014 je skupni delež takšnih naložb v Evropi znašal nekaj več kot 2 % BDP, od česar je zasebni sektor predstavljal 64%.
Comparable figures for the USA were 2,8 % in 2012, 3,5 % for Japan and 4,2 % for South Korea (for both countries in 2013). 
Primerljive številke so bile 2,8% za ZDA leta 2012, 3,5 % za Japonsko in 4,2 % za Južno Korejo (za obe leta 2013).
Whilst the 3 % R&D intensity indicator measures the input of funds in research and development, it also reflects the effectiveness of policy measures taken to stimulate a high quality science base in the Member States and to create better framework conditions for research and innovation in the private sector. 
3.12 Čeprav 3-odstotni kazalnik intenzivnosti raziskav in razvoja meri vložek sredstev v raziskave in razvoj, odraža tudi učinkovitost ukrepov politike, ki so bili sprejeti za spodbujanje visokokakovostne znanstvene baze v državah članicah in za vzpostavitev boljših okvirnih pogojev za raziskave in razvoj v zasebnem sektorju.
(9) Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013. 
(9) Priloga I k Uredbi (EU) št.
(10) Recital 3 of Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013. 
(10) Uvodna izjava 3 Uredbe (EU) št.
In March 2002, the Barcelona Council set the objective to increase the average research investment level from 1,9 % of GDP to 3 % of GDP, of which two thirds should be funded by the private sector. 
Marca 2002 je Svet v Barceloni določil cilj, da se povprečna stopnja naložb v raziskave poveča z 1,9 % BDP na 3 % BDP, od česar bi moral dve tretjini financirati zasebni sektor.
It was always expected that Member States would provide the bulk of funds in this area. 
Vedno se je pričakovalo, da bodo večino sredstev na tem področju zagotovile države članice.
In 2014, the first year of implementation, Horizon 2020 spending by the EU institutions represented just under 10 % of total public budgets for R&D. We noted in last year’s annual report that meeting all national targets for research and development would lead to a total investment of 2,6 % of GDP by 2020, some way below the 3 % target (11). of the European Union C 375/85 THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 3.13. 
Leta 2014, ki je bilo prvo leto izvajanja, je poraba institucij EU v okviru Obzorja 2020 predstavljala malo pod 10 % skupnih javnih proračunov za raziskave in razvoj. V lanskem letnem poročilu smo ugotovili, da bi doseganje vseh nacionalnih ciljev na področju raziskav in razvoja pomenilo naložbo v skupni višini 2,6 % BDP do leta 2020, kar je pod ciljem v višini 3 % (11).
In the area of research, as well as Horizon 2020, efforts are made to coordinate and improve Member States’ investment in research and innovation, and to develop framework conditions that allow private sector innovation to thrive (open innovation). 
3.13 Na področju raziskav ter v okviru Obzorja 2020 potekajo prizadevanja za uskladitev in izboljšanje naložb držav članic v raziskave in inovacije ter za oblikovanje okvirnih pogojev, ki omogočajo uspeh inovacij v zasebnem sektorju (odprte inovacije).
This is crucial to making significant progress in closing the innovation divide between the European Union and its key competitors. 
To je bistveno za pomemben napredek pri zmanjševanju inovacijske vrzeli med Evropsko unijo in njenimi ključnimi konkurenti.
Increasing impact and excellent science through openness (open science) and a digital single market, embedding digital into the grand societal challenges, implementing the research, innovation and competitiveness dimension of the Energy Union, together with a forward-looking climate-change policy, and translating Europe’s strengths in science and technology into a leading global voice (open to the world) are also key objectives of research policy. 
Ključni cilji raziskovalne politike so tudi povečanje učinka in odličnosti znanosti prek odprtosti (odprta znanost) ter enotnega digitalnega trga, umestitev digitalnega v velike družbene izzive, izvajanje dimenzije raziskav, inovacij in konkurenčnosti energetske unije skupaj s politiko na področju podnebnih sprememb, usmerjeno v prihodnost, ter prenos evropskih prednosti na področju znanosti in tehnologije v vodilno vlogo na svetovni ravni (odprtost svetu).
Research and innovation investments from the cohesion policy programmes for 2007-2013 also contributed to the progress towards the 3 % target. 
Naložbe v raziskave in razvoj iz programov kohezijske politike za obdobje 2007–2013 so prav tako prispevale k napredku pri doseganju ciljne vrednosti v višini 3%.
This contribution is continued for the 2014-2020 programming period thanks to the thematic concentration of ERDF and will strengthen its impact and leverage thanks to the ‘Smart Specialisation’ ex ante conditionality for research and innovation. 
Ta prispevek se zaradi tematske osredotočenosti ESRR v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 nadaljuje in bo še okrepil svoj učinek in finančni vzvod zaradi strategije „pametne specializacije“ kot predhodne pogojenosti za raziskave in inovacije.
The contribution of Horizon 2020 to the achievement of the Europe 2020 strategy is reinforced by the interaction with other actions at EU and national level. 
Prispevek Obzorja 2020 k uresničevanju strategije Evropa 2020 krepijo povezave z drugimi ukrepi na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni.
3.14. The second Horizon 2020 performance indicator, on innovation, is a composite output indicator. 
3.14 Drugi kazalnik smotrnosti poslovanja za Obzorje 2020, ki se nanaša na inovacije, je sestavljen kazalnik izložkov.
It was initially developed for the Europe 2020 flagship initiative ‘Innovation Union’ (12). 
Prvotno je bil razvit za vodilno pobudo Evrope 2020 Unija inovacij (12).
It captures information on four elements: patents, employment in knowledge-intensive activities, competitiveness of knowledge-intensive goods and services, and employment in fast-growing firms of innovative sectors. 
Ta kazalnik zajame informacije o štirih elementih: patentih, številu delovnih mest v dejavnostih z intenzivno uporabo znanja, konkurenčnosti blaga in storitev, ki temeljijo na znanju, ter številu delovnih mest v hitro rastočih podjetjih inovativnega sektorja.
The Composite Indicators Research Group (financed by the EU) has pointed to the fact that such indicators, based on sub-indicators with no common meaningful unit of measurement and with no obvious method for weighting, have pros and cons. 
Raziskovalna skupina za sestavljene kazalnike (Composite Indicators Research Group), ki jo financira EU, je opozorila, da imajo tovrstni kazalniki, ki temeljijo na podkazalnikih brez skupne smiselne merske enote in brez očitne metode za ponderiranje, dobre in slabe strani.
In particular, while they illustrate the big picture, there is a risk that in isolation they can lead to simplistic policy conclusions; they should therefore be used in combination with the sub-indicators. 
Zlasti obstaja tveganje, da, kadar se uporabljajo ločeno, kljub dajanju pregleda nad splošnim stanjem privedejo do preveč poenostavljenih zaključkov politik. Zato bi jih bilo treba uporabljati v kombinaciji s podkazalniki.
The Commission reported on this indicator and the sub-indicators in March 2016 (13). 
Komisija je o tem kazalniku in podkazalnikih poročala marca 2016 (13).
(11) 2014 annual report, paragraph 3.17(b). 
(11) Odstavek 3.17(b) letnega poročila za leto 2014.
(12) COM(2013) 624 final of 13 September 2013, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘Measuring innovation output in Europe: towards a new indicator’. 
(12) COM(2013) 624 final z dne 13. septembra 2013, Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Merjenje rezultatov inovacij v Evropi: novemu kazalniku naproti.
(13) ‘Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU 2016, A contribution to the open innovation, open science, open to the world agenda: 2016’ report. 
(13) Poročilo Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU 2016, A contribution to the open innovation, open science, open to the world agenda: 2016 (smotrnost na področjih znanosti, raziskav in inovacij v EU: prispevek k agendi za odprte inovacije, odprto znanost in odprtost svetu, leto 2016).
EN C 375/86 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 3.15. The innovation output indicator has the advantage that it focuses attention on establishing the right conditions for innovation and that it provides a measure for assessing progress in innovation at the level of the EU economy. 
C 375/86 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA ODGOVORI KOMISIJE 3.15 Kazalnik izložkov za inovacije ima to prednost, da je 3.15 osredotočen na vzpostavljanje ustreznih pogojev za inovacije in da zagotavlja merilo za ocenjevanje napredka pri inovacijah na ravni gospodarstva EU.
However, it also has a number of shortcomings which limit its usefulness for monitoring the Horizon 2020 contribution towards the Europe 2020 strategy objectives: — the Commission has not yet set a quantified target to be reached by a defined date (14); THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES — the Commission has not translated it into national targets to reflect the individual situation of each Member State — as recommended by experts in the field for indicators measuring innovation (15). 3.16. 
Ima pa tudi več pomanjkljivosti, ki omejujejo njegovo koristnost pri spremljanju prispevka Obzorja 2020 k doseganju strateških ciljev Evrope 2020: — Komisija še ni določila količinsko opredeljenega cilja, ki bi ga bilo treba doseči do opredeljenega datuma (14), — Da bi količinsko opredeljena ciljna vrednost lahko vplivala na oblikovanje politik in spodbudila napredek, mora biti sporazumno določena, upravičena na podlagi dokazov in primerjalne analize, lahko razumljiva in preprosto razložljiva.
This is more difficult to achieve in the case of composite indicators, such as the Innovation Output Indicator, as the summary scores in which they result are by nature abstract. 
To je težje doseči v primeru sestavljenih kazalnikov, kot je kazalnik izložkov za inovacije, saj so sumarna števila točk, ki iz njih izhajajo, po naravi abstraktna.
Therefore, composite indicators typically do not come with target levels. 
Zato sestavljeni kazalniki običajno nimajo ciljnih vrednosti.
Another example of this is the Summary Index of the Innovation Union Scoreboard, which also does not have a target level, but still clearly has an impact on policymaking of Member States. 
Še en tak primer je sumarni indeks sistema inovacijskih kazalnikov, ki prav tako nima ciljne vrednosti, vendar vseeno očitno vpliva na oblikovanje politik v državah članicah.
Furthermore, the available time series for some of the component indicators are still too short to establish trend lines and identify a meaningful EU target level (the component on high-growth enterprise was based on a new Eurostat data collection). 
Poleg tega so razpoložljive časovne vrste določenih indikatorjev, sestavljenih iz več komponent, še vedno prekratke, da bi se ugotovili trendi in določile smiselne ciljne vrednosti na ravni EU (komponenta hitro rastočega podjetja temelji na novi zbirki podatkov Eurostata).
In addition, setting an EU target level would require benchmarking against the performance non-EU countries, something not possible at the time the indicator was launched. — The Research intensity target is set by Member State, and the Innovation Output Indicator complements it by providing the policy picture on innovation output. These different elements need to be seen together. 3.15. 
Poleg tega zahteva določitev ciljnih vrednosti na ravni EU primerjalne analize s smotrnostjo poslovanja držav zunaj EU, kar ni bilo mogoče, ko je bil kazalnik uveden. — Ciljno vrednost za intenzivnost raziskav določi država članica, dopolnjuje pa jo kazalnik izložkov za inovacije, tako da zagotavlja sliko politike na področju izložkov inovacij.
(14) The DG for Research and Innovation (RTD) 2015 management plan states that the target is ‘to be defined at a later stage, based on country-specific progress of Member States with respect to the whole of the indicator and its four components’, p. 
Posebni cilji, določeni v okviru Obzorja 2020, so (14) V načrtu upravljanja GD za raziskave in inovacije (RTD) za leto 2015 je navedeno, da bo cilj opredeljen pozneje na podlagi napredka posamezne države članice glede na celotni kazalnik in njegove štiri komponente, str.
(15) Elements for the setting-up of headline indicators for innovation in support of the Europe 2020 strategy. 
(15) Elements for the setting-up of headline indicators for innovation in support of the Europe 2020 strategy (elementi za določanje krovnih kazalnikov za inovacije v podporo strategiji Evropa 2020).
Report of the High Level Panel on the measurement of ‘Innovation’. 
Poročilo skupine na visoki ravni za merjenje na področju inovacij.
Brussels, 30 September 2010: ‘The properties are: 7. 
Bruselj, 30. september 2010: Lastnosti so: 7.
The indicators and possible targets should be translatable (in a non-mechanical way) into targets for the different Member States’, p. 
Kazalnike in mogoče cilje bi moralo biti mogoče pretvoriti (na nesamodejen način) v cilje za različne države članice, str.
However, although they are a useful indication of the generic relationship between Horizon 2020 and the Europe 2020 strategy, they are not further translated at lower levels into more specific and operational links that could serve as the basis for monitoring and reporting the contribution of Horizon 2020 to the individual flagship initiatives and thus the Europe 2020 strategy. 
Toda čeprav so koristen pokazatelj splošnega razmerja med Obzorjem 2020 in strategijo Evropa 2020, na nižjih ravneh niso nadalje pretvorjeni v določnejše in delujoče povezave, ki bi bile lahko podlaga za spremljanje prispevka Obzorja 2020 k posameznim vodilnim pobudam in torej k strategiji Evropa 2020 ter za poročanje o tem prispevku.
The links between the Commission’s 10 political priorities and Europe 2020/Horizon 2020 need further clarification 3.18. In 2013, the regulation establishing Horizon 2020 set priorities, general and specific objectives for the period 2014-2020. 
Povezave med desetimi političnimi prednostnimi nalogami Komisije in Evropo 2020/Obzorjem 2020 je treba dodatno razjasniti 3.18 Leta 2013 so bile v uredbi o vzpostavitvi Obzorja 2020 določene prednostne naloge ter splošni in posebni cilji za obdobje 2014–2020.
These priorities and objectives were designed to be aligned with, and to contribute to, the Europe 2020 strategy (16). 
Te prednostne naloge in cilji so bili zasnovani tako, da bi bili usklajeni s strategijo Evropa 2020 in bi k njej prispevali (16).
Towards the end of 2014, the current Commission set 10 priorities for the Commission as a whole for 2014-2019(17). 
Proti koncu leta 2014 je sedanja Komisija določila deset prednostnih nalog za Komisijo kot celoto za obdobje 2014–2019 (17).
While these priorities highlight some new areas (such as a free trade agreement with the United States), they also overlap significantly, as one would expect, with the existing Europe 2020 strategy, including its headline targets and flagship initiatives. 
Te prednostne naloge sicer poudarjajo nekatera nova področja (kot je sporazum o prosti trgovini z Združenimi državami), toda kot je pričakovati, se tudi močno prekrivajo z obstoječo strategijo Evropa 2020, vključno z njenimi krovnimi ciljni in vodilnimi pobudami.
For example, employment and climate change are issues which feature heavily in both. 
Pri obeh sta na primer močno prisotna zaposlovanje in podnebne spremembe.
Despite the overlaps and complementarities, it has been difficult to establish the extent to which the 10 political priorities form a distinct new approach of the Commission or are intended as a new way for the Commission to put Europe 2020 into operation for its work. 3.19. 
Čeprav se to dvoje prekriva in medsebojno dopolnjuje, je bilo težko ugotoviti, v kakšnem obsegu teh deset političnih prednostnih nalog pomeni povsem nov pristop Komisije ali so mišljene kot nov način, s katerim bi Komisija v okviru svojih dejavnosti začela izvajanje Evrope 2020.
However, as pointed out by the Commission’s internal audit service, although there is common ground between the two strategies, the Commission has, so far, not mapped the correspondence between them. 
Kot pa je opozorila služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo, imata strategiji sicer skupne točke, toda Komisija še ni opredelila ujemanj med njimi.
In our view, since the relationship between the two strategies has not been clarified, they coexist and are used for different purposes: THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 3.17. For the preparation of the budget, the contribution of Horizon 2020 to each flagship initiative is provided in the Horizon 2020 programme statement on an annual basis, following a methodology developed with the launch of the programme. 
Ker razmerje med strategijama ni razjasnjeno, po našem mnenju soobstajata in se uporabljata v različne namene: 3.17 V okviru priprave proračuna je prispevek Obzorja 2020 k vsaki vodilni pobudi na letni ravni določen v izjavi o programu Obzorje 2020, in sicer na podlagi metodologije, ki je bila razvita z uvedbo programa.
The Europe 2020 strategy is the growth strategy for a decade for the EU and at EU level. 
3.18 Evropa 2020 je strategija rasti za EU in na ravni EU, opredeljena za obdobje desetih let.
In line with the Europe 2020 strategy, the 10 political priorities of the Commission provide a clear and focused agenda/strategy for the activities of the Commission towards Europe 2020 and they are entirely consistent with the overall Europe 2020 goals. 
V skladu s strategijo Evropa 2020 deset političnih prednostnih nalog Komisije zagotavlja jasno in osredotočeno agendo/strategijo za dejavnosti Komisije v zvezi z Evropo 2020, ki so povsem skladne s splošnimi cilji Evrope 2020.
At the same time, they provide greater clarity and focus in the Commission’s overall political strategy, taking into account recent developments. 
Obenem zagotavljajo jasnost in osredotočenost celotne politične strategije Komisije ob upoštevanju aktualnih dogodkov.
For example, since the establishment of the Europe 2020 strategy the EU has seen sovereign debt crises, increasing public sector deficits, war in Ukraine and Syria, a massive flow of migrants towards it, and the COP 21 climate agreement. 
Od ustanovitve strategije Evropa 2020 je EU na primer doživela dolžniško krizo, povečevanje primanjkljaja v javnem sektorju, vojno v Ukrajini in Siriji, masovni prihod migrantov v EU in podnebni sporazum COP 21.
These 10 political priorities have also been presented to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council in the course of the appointment of the new Commission. 
Teh deset političnih prednostnih nalog je bilo v okviru imenovanja nove Komisije predstavljenih tudi Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu svetu in Svetu.
The priorities take over, as targets and indicators, the targets and indicators of the Europe 2020 strategy. 
V prednostnih nalogah, opredeljenih kot ciljne vrednosti in kazalniki, so prevzeti ciljne vrednosti in kazalniki strategije Evropa 2020.
The Commission considers that its priorities provide a clear and focused policy agenda for the Commission that is consistent with the Europe 2020 strategy for the European Union as a whole. 
3.19 Komisija meni, da njene prednostne naloge zagotavljajo jasno in osredotočeno politično agendo Komisije, ki je skladna s strategijo Evropa 2020 za Evropsko unijo kot celoto.
As such, they are naturally used for different purposes. 
Kot takšne se seveda uporabljajo za različne namene.
However, this does not mean that they are in any way inconsistent or incoherent, they are entirely complementary. 
Vendar to ne pomeni, da so kakor koli nedosledne ali neskladne, saj se v celoti dopolnjujejo.
(16) Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013. 
(16) Člena 4 in 5 Uredbe (EU) št.
(17) The 10 political priorities as outlined by the President of the Commission on 12 November 2014 are: ‘Jobs, growth and investment’, ‘Digital single market’, ‘Energy union and climate’, ‘Internal market’, ‘A deeper and fairer economic and monetary union’, ‘A balanced EU-US free trade agreement’, ‘Justice and fundamental rights’, ‘Migration’, ‘A stronger global actor’, and ‘Democratic change’. 
(17) Med deset političnih prednostnih nalog, kot jih je 12. novembra 2014 opredelil predsednik Komisije, spadajo: delovna mesta, rast in naložbe, enotni digitalni trg, energetska unija in podnebje, notranji trg, bolj poglobljena in pravičnejša ekonomska in monetarna unija, uravnotežen sporazum o prosti trgovini med EU in ZDA, pravosodje in temeljne pravice, migracije, močnejši globalni akter ter demokratične spremembe.
EN C 375/88 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS — The allocation of the EU budget to spending programmes — (such as Horizon 2020) is based on, among other things, their contribution to the Europe 2020 headline targets and flagship initiatives. 
C 375/88 Uradni list Evropske unije 13.10.2016 ODGOVORI KOMISIJE SL UGOTOVITVE SODIŠČA — — dodeljevanje sredstev iz proračuna EU programom porabe (kot je Obzorje 2020) med drugim temelji na njihovem prispevku h krovnim ciljem in vodilnim pobudam Evrope 2020.
The monitoring and evaluation of spending programmes also builds on objectives designed to reflect the Europe 2020 strategy. — The Commission’s annual work programme now focuses — on the 10 political priorities. 
Spremljanje in vrednotenje programov porabe temelji tudi na ciljih, zasnovanih, da bi odražali strategijo Evropa 2020, letni program dela Komisije je zdaj osredotočen na deset političnih prednostnih nalog.
Starting from 2016, the Commission has also introduced a new method of strategic planning, which requires DGs to prepare 5-year strategic plans, also based on the 10 political priorities. 
Z letom 2016 je Komisija uvedla tudi novo metodo strateškega načrtovanja, v skladu s katero morajo generalni direktorati pripraviti petletne strateške načrte, ki prav tako temeljijo na desetih političnih prednostnih nalogah.
The 5-year strategic plans will become the starting point for drafting annual management plans (MPs) for carrying out the DGs’ tasks (including the implementation of spending programmes such as Horizon 2020). 
Petletni strateški načrti bodo postali izhodišče za pripravo letnih načrtov upravljanja za izvedbo nalog generalnih direktoratov (vključno z izvajanjem programov porabe, kot je Obzorje 2020).
Since the reporting in annual activity reports is strongly linked to the MPs, annual activity reports from 2016 onwards can also be expected to reflect primarily the 10 political priorities. THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES In relation to Horizon 2020 this was implemented in the first work programmes, for 2014-2015. 
Ker je poročanje v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih močno povezano z načrti upravljanja, je mogoče pričakovati tudi, da bodo ta poročila od leta 2016 odražala predvsem deset političnih prednostnih nalog. — V zvezi z Obzorjem 2020 je bilo to izvedeno v prvih delovnih programih za obdobje 2014–2015.