natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recommendation 4 (d) The Commission acknowledges that the issue concerning the setting-up of financial securities to cover closure and after-care costs is a systemic problem in need of a global approach. 
Priporočilo 4 (d) Komisija priznava, da je vprašanje v zvezi z zagotovitvijo zadostnih sredstev za pokritje stroškov zaprtja odlagališč in njihovega upravljanja po zaprtju sistemska težava, pri kateri je potreben globalen pristop.
15 In accordance with Article 9 of the waste framework directive. 
15 V skladu s členom 9 okvirne direktive o odpadkih.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2012 — 66 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9241-005-6 doi:10.2865/4077 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2012 – 66 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9241-020-9 doi:10.2865/43895
Free publications: HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • at the European Union’s representations or delegations. You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://ec.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758. 
KAKO DO PUBLIKACIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE Brezplačne publikacije: http://bookshop.europa.eu); na spletni strani http://ec.europa.eu ali po faksu +352 2929-42758.
Priced publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). 
Publikacije, ki so naprodaj: http://bookshop.europa.eu).
Priced subscriptions (e.g. annual series of the Official Journal of the European Union and reports of cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union): • via one of the sales agents of the Publications Office of the European Union (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm). 
Plačljive naročnine (na primer na Uradni list Evropske unije ali zbirke odločb sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije): (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_sl.htm).
MUNICIPAL WASTE IF NOT COLLECTED, TREATED AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY CAN CAUSE NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. AS A RESULT, THE EU HAS INTRODUCED COMMON STANDARDS AND TARGETS IN THE FORM OF DIRECTIVES AND CO-FINANCES WASTE MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURES IN SPECIFIC REGIONS. IN THIS REPORT THE COURT EXAMINED WHETHER THESE INVESTMENTS IN INFRASTRUCTURE HAVE BEEN EFFECTIVE AND HAVE HELPED TO ACHIEVE EU WASTE POLICY OBJECTIVES. 
ČE SE KOMUNALNI ODPADKI NE ZBIRAJO, OBDELUJEJO IN ODSTRANJUJEJO NA USTREZEN NAČIN, IMAJO LAHKO NEGATIVEN VPLIV NA OKOLJE, ZATO JE EU Z DIREKTIVAMI UVEDLA SKUPNE STANDARDE IN CILJNE VREDNOSTI, POLEG TEGA PA SOFINANCIRA OBJEKTE ZA RAVNANJE Z ODPADKI V NEKATERIH REGIJAH. SODIŠČE JE V TEM POROČILU PREVERJALO, ALI SO BILE NALOŽBE V TE OBJEKTE USPEŠNE IN ALI SO PRIPOMOGLE K DOSEGANJU CILJEV POLITIKE EU GLEDE RAVNANJA Z ODPADKI.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-12-020-EN-C 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJAB12020SLC
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS EN THE EUROPEAN UNION SOLIDARITY FUND’S RESPONSE TO THE 2009 ABRUZZI EARTHQUAKE: THE RELEVANCE AND COST OF OPERATIONS Special Report No 24 2012 ISSN 1831-0834 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE SL ODZIV SOLIDARNOSTNEGA SKLADA EVROPSKE UNIJE NA POTRES V ABRUCIH LETA 2009: USTREZNOST IN STROŠKI UKREPOV Posebno poročilo št. 24 2012 ISSN 1831-094X
Special Report No 24 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION SOLIDARITY FUND’S RESPONSE TO THE 2009 ABRUZZI EARTHQUAKE: THE RELEVANCE AND COST OF OPERATIONS (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 24 2012 ODZIV SOLIDARNOSTNEGA SKLADA EVROPSKE UNIJE NA POTRES V ABRUCIH LETA 2009: USTREZNOST IN STROŠKI UKREPOV (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Fax +352 4398-46410 E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://eca.europa.eu Special Report No 24 2012 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: eca-info@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013 ISBN 978-92-9241-071-1 doi:10.2865/53557 © European Union, 2012 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2013 ISBN 978-92-9241-086-5 doi:10.2865/55669 © Evropska unija, 2012 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
3 CONTENTS Paragraph I–V 1–6 7–8 9–49 9–20 9–20 21–28 21–23 24–26 27–28 29–49 29–32 33–36 37–41 42–49 GLOSSARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH OBSERVATIONS IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT AND THE EUSF REGULATION THE EUSF REGULATION DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR SOLUTIONS SUCH AS THE CASE PROJECT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CASE PROJECT THE STRATEGY UNDERLYING THE CASE PROJECT WAS EASY TO UNDERSTAND, BUT ... ... 
3 KAZALO Odstavek I–V 1–6 7–8 9–49 9–20 9–20 21–28 21–23 24–26 27–28 29–49 29–32 33–36 37–41 42–49 GLOSAR POVZETEK UVOD OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP OPAŽANJA SPORAZUM O IZVAJANJU IN UREDBA O SSEU UREDBA O SSEU NE PREDVIDEVA REŠITEV, KOT JE PROJEKT CASE NAČRTOVANJE IN IZVAJANJE PROJEKTA CASE STRATEGIJE, NA KATERI TEMELJI PROJEKT CASE, NI BILO TEŽKO RAZUMETI, TODA ... ...
THERE WERE SHORTCOMINGS IN THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND ... ... 
OCENA POTREB JE BILA POMANJKLJIVA, POLEG TEGA PA ... ...
MOST OF THE APARTMENTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE BEFORE WINTER THE COST OF THE CASE APARTMENTS THE CASE APARTMENTS WERE RELATIVELY COSTLY IMPACT OF THE EMERGENCY AND SEISMIC ISOLATION THE NUMBER OF BIDDERS WAS LIMITED PRICE WAS A SECONDARY CRITERION FOR AWARDING CONTRACTS Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
VEČINA STANOVANJ NI BILA NA VOLJO PRED ZIMO STROŠKI ZA STANOVANJA CASE STANOVANJA CASE SO BILA RELATIVNO DRAGA UČINEK NUJE IN POTRESNE IZOLACIJE ŠTEVILO PONUDNIKOV JE BILO OMEJENO CENA JE BILA PRI ODDAJI JAVNIH NAROČIL DRUGOTNEGA POMENA Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
50–58 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ANNEX I ANNEX II ANNEX III — EU SOLIDARITY FUND INTERVENTIONS SINCE 2002 — AUDIT COVERAGE — SEISMIC RISK IN ITALY REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 4 Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
50–58 ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA PRILOGA I – PRILOGA II – PRILOGA III – ODGOVORI KOMISIJE INTERVENCIJE SOLIDARNOSTNEGA SKLADA EU OD LETA 2002 REVIZIJSKA POKRITOST POTRESNA OGROŽENOST V ITALIJI 4 Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
5 GLOSSARY CASE: The acronym for Complessi Antisismici Sostenibili Ecocompatibili, i.e. seismically isolated and environmentally sustainable housing. 
GLOSAR CASE: Kratica za „Complessi Antisismici Sostenibili Ecocompatibili“, torej potresno varni in okoljsko trajnostni stanovanjski kompleksi.
The CASE project was announced by the Italian Council of Ministers on 23 April 2009. 
Projekt CASE je italijanski ministrski svet napovedal 23. aprila 2009.
On 28 April 2009 the Italian Government issued Decree Law No 39, known as the Decreto Abruzzo, which required the Department of Civil Protection to ensure the construction of CASE housing that could be used in a durable manner. 
Italijanska vlada je 28. aprila 2009 izdala zakonsko uredbo št. 39, znano kot „Decreto Abruzzo“, ki je zahtevala, da služba civilne zaščite zagotovi gradnjo stanovanj CASE, ki jih bo mogoče trajno uporabljati.
The buildings are built on special pillars to isolate them from horizontal earthquake movements. 
Stavbe so postavljene na posebnih stebrih, ki jih varujejo pred horizontalno potresno silo.
In addition, they are energy efficient and include renewable energy systems, such as photovoltaic panels and solar water heaters. 
Poleg tega so energetsko učinkovite in imajo sisteme za pridobivanje energije iz obnovljivih virov, kot so fotovoltaični paneli in grelniki vode na sončno energijo.
Department of Civil Protection: The Italian Civil Protection is an integrated system that allows the coordinated use of all available state and private resources. 
Služba civilne zaščite: Italijanska civilna zaščita je integriran sistem, ki omogoča usklajeno uporabo vseh razpoložljivih državnih in zasebnih virov.
It is a Department of the Prime Minister’s office and includes, by law, a number of authorities, administrations and private and public bodies (including the army, navy, air force, many ministries and regional governments) and members of the academic community involved in research activities. 
Je služba v okviru urada predsednika vlade in po zakonu vključuje več organov, uprav, zasebnih in javnih teles (vključno z vojsko, mornarico, zračnimi silami, več ministrstvi in dežel-nimi vladami) ter člane akademske skupnosti, ki se ukvarjajo z raziskovalnimi dejavnostmi.
The budget for the year 2012 is 1,67 billion euro, out of which 72 % covers loans related to previous years’ disasters, 21 % operations envisaged by law and 7 % the Department’s internal expenses, including the cost of the air fleet. 
Njen proračun za leto 2012 je 1,67 milijarde EUR, od česar 72 % krije posojila, povezana z nesrečami v prejšnjih letih, 21 % ukrepe, ki jih določa zakonodaja, 7 % pa notranje odhodke službe, vključno s stroški za zračno floto.
EUSF: The European Union Solidarity Fund was set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 to respond to major natural disasters and express European solidarity with disaster-stricken regions in Europe. 
SSEU: Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije je bil ustanovljen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 za odzivanje na večje naravne nesreče in izkazovanje evropske solidarnosti prizadetim regijam v Evropi.
It has been used for disasters covering a range of different catastrophic events such as floods, forest fires, earthquakes, storms and drought. 
Uporablja se za različne hude nesreče, kot so poplave, gozdni požari, potresi, neurja in suša.
The EUSF can be mobilised only where the damage caused by the national disaster exceeds the threshold of 3 billion euro (in 2002 prices) or 0,6 % of national GNI. 
SSEU se lahko uporabi le, če škoda, ki jo je povzročila nacionalna katastrofa, presega prag 3 milijard EUR (v cenah iz leta 2002) ali 0,6 % nacionalnega BND.
The Fund has an annual budget of 1 billion euro. 
Letni proračun sklada znaša 1 milijardo EUR.
As of November 2011, almost 2,5 billion euro in aid was financed from the Fund (see Annex I). 
Do novembra 2011 je bilo iz sklada financirane skoraj 2,5 milijarde EUR pomoči (glej Prilogo I).
Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
6 Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
7 I. The aim of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) is to help Member States and countries in the process of negotiating their accession to the European Union to respond to major natural disasters by complementing their public expenditure on essential emergency operations. 
7 I. Cilj Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (SSEU) je pomagati državam članicam in državam, ki se pogajajo o pristopu k Evropski uniji, pri odzivanju na večje naravne nesreče z dopolnjevanjem njihovih javnih odhodkov pri bistvenih nujnih ukrepih.
Operations to be financed include the immediate restoration to working order of infrastructure and plant in the fields of energy, water, waste water, transport, telecommunications, health and education, and the provision of temporary accommodation and rescue services to meet the immediate needs of the population. 
Med ukrepi, ki se financirajo, so takojšnja usposobitev infrastrukture in naprav na področju energetike, vode, odpadnih voda, prometa, telekomunikacij, zdravja in izobraževanja ter zagotovitev začasne nastanitve in nujnih storitev za zadovoljitev nujnih potreb prebivalstva.
In early April 2009, an earthquake hit the Italian Abruzzi region and its capital city of L’Aquila, causing direct damage estimated at more than 10 billion euro. 
V začetku aprila 2009 je italijansko deželo Abruci in njeno glavno mesto L’Aquilo prizadel potres, ki je po ocenah povzročil za več kot 10 milijard EUR neposredne škode.
In November 2009, the European Union contributed half a billion euro to the Italian emergency operations from its Solidarity Fund. 
Novembra 2009 je Evropska unija iz svojega Solidarnostnega sklada za nujne ukrepe v Italiji prispevala pol milijarde EUR.
According to the implementation agreement, this contribution was to be used for (i) first emergency operations (indicative EUSF contribution 50 million euro), (ii) MAP (temporary housing modules for 7 000 people) and MUSP (temporary schools for 15 000 schoolchildren) projects (indicative EUSF contribution 94 million euro) and (iii) the CASE housing project for 15 000 people (indicative EUSF contribution 350 million euro). 
V skladu s sporazumom o izvajanju naj bi bil ta prispevek porabljen za (i) prve ukrepe nujne pomoči (okvirni prispevek iz SSEU v višini 50 milijonov EUR), (ii) projekta MAP (začasni stanovanjski moduli za 7 000 ljudi) in MUSP (začasne šole za 15 000 šolskih otrok) (okvirni prispevek iz SSEU v višini 94 milijonov EUR) in (iii) stanovanjski projekt CASE za 15 000 ljudi (okvirni prispevek iz SSEU v višini 350 milijonov EUR).
The Court’s audit examined whether (i) the expenditure provided for in the implementation agreement was compliant with the EUSF regulation, (ii) whether the CASE project was well planned and rapidly implemented and (iii) whether the CASE project was implemented with due regard to economy. 
Sodišče je pri reviziji preučilo, (i) ali so bili odhodki, določeni v sporazumu o izvajanju, skladni z uredbo o SSEU, (ii) ali je bil projekt CASE dobro načrtovan in hitro izveden ter (iii) ali je bil projekt CASE izveden ob ustreznem upoštevanju gospodarnosti.
The Court found that the financed projects, except the CASE project, were eligible according to the EUSF regulation. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so bili financirani projekti razen projekta CASE v skladu z uredbo o SSEU upravičeni.
They had all been implemented according to the implementation agreement and responded to many immediate needs of the earthquake-affected population. 
Vsi so bili izvedeni v skladu s sporazumom o izvajanju in so se odzvali na mnoge nujne potrebe prebivalstva, ki ga je prizadel potres.
The strategy chosen by the Italian authorities to construct CASE apartments was easy to understand, but the project did not succeed in accommodating all the displaced population before winter. 
Strategija, ki so jo izbrali italijanski organi pri gradnji stanovanj CASE, je bila zlahka razumljiva, vendar projektu ni uspelo zagotoviti nastanitve vsem razseljenim prebivalcem pred zimo.
The CASE apartments turned out to be unnecessarily costly and accommodated too few people and there were shortcomings in the planning of the project and in ensuring economy in the implementation of the project. 
Stanovanja CASE so se izkazala za nepotrebno draga in so nudila nastanitev premalo ljudem, načrtovanje projekta in zagotavljanje gospodarnosti pri njegovem izvajanju pa sta bila pomanjkljiva.
V. With a view to learning from the Abruzzi experience and taking the specific emergency situation and its impact into due consideration, the Court recommends that the Commission should: (i) consider adapting the EUSF regulation to the recent developments in disaster-response strategies, (ii) encourage Member States to improve their emergency preparedness to achieve timely and cost-effective assistance and (iii) promote due regard to economy in the design and implementation of emergency projects. 
V. Sodišče priporoča, naj Komisija zaradi učenja iz izkušenj z Abruci in ustreznega upoštevanja specifičnih nujnih razmer in njihovega učinka: (i) razmisli o prilagoditvi uredbe o SSEU nedavnemu razvoju strategij odzivanja na nesreče, (ii) spodbuja države članice k izboljšanju njihove pripravljenosti na nesreče, da bo dosežena pravočasna in stroškovno učinkovita pomoč, ter (iii) spodbuja ustrezno upoštevanje gospodarnosti pri zasnovi in izvajanju nujnih projektov.
On 6 April 2009, a 6,3 magnitude earthquake struck the Italian region of Abruzzi. 
Italijansko deželo Abruci je 6. aprila 2009 stresel potres z magnitudo 6,3.
The earthquake caused severe damage to basic infrastructure and brought serious harm to the population. 
Hudo je poškodoval osnovno infrastrukturo in resno škodoval prebival-cem.
The areas hit by the event included the whole province of L’Aquila, most of the Abruzzi Region and some bordering areas. 
Prizadel je celotno pokrajino L’Aquila, večino dežele Abruci in nekatera območja, ki mejijo nanjo.
This strong seismic event had its epicentre in the regional capital L’Aquila, which was particularly hard hit in its historical centre. 
Epicenter tega močnega seizmičnega dogodka je bil v deželnem glavnem mestu L’Aquila in je posebno prizadel njegovo zgodovinsko središče.
Photo 1 — Damage to L’Aquila Cathedral © European Court of Auditors. 
Fotografija 1 – Škoda na katedrali v L'Aquili © Evropsko računsko sodišče.
Out of a total population of approximately 300 000 affected by the disaster, more than 300 people died and 1 500 were injured. 
Nesreča je skupaj prizadela približno 300 000 prebivalcev. Več kot 300 ljudi je umrlo, 1 500 pa je bilo ranjenih.
Thousands lost their houses and/or businesses, and up to 67 500 people were placed in tented camps, hotels and private houses. 
Na tisoče jih je izgubilo svoje do-move in/ali kraj zaposlitve. Do 67 500 ljudi so naselili v šotorska naselja, hotele in zasebne hiše.
A significant proportion of the buildings surveyed after the earthquake were found to be entirely unsafe1 (see Table 1). 
Za velik delež stavb so pri pregledu po potresu ugotovili, da so skrajno nevarne1 (glej tabelo 1).
According to the application for assistance from the European Solidarity Fund, the total direct damage was estimated at more than 10 billion euro, which represented 0,67 % of Italy’s GNI and over three times the threshold of 3 billion euro for mobilising the EU Solidarity Fund2. 
V vlogi za pomoč iz Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije je bila skupna neposredna škoda ocenjena na več kot 10 milijard EUR, kar je predstavljalo 0,67 % italijanskega BND in več kot trikratno vrednost praga za uporabo sklada2.
The Italian authorities applied for financial assistance relating to the earthquake within the 10-week deadline set for applications to the EUSF. 
Italijanski organi so za finančno pomoč zaradi potresa zaprosili v desetih tednih, ki so določeni kot rok za vloge za SSEU.
The Commission issued a decision dated 8 June 2009 proposing that the Council and European Parliament, which together constitute the European Union’s budgetary authority, should mobilise 494 million euro for financial assistance3. 
Komisija je 8. junija 2009 izdala odločbo, v kateri je predlagala, naj Svet in Evropski parlament, ki skupaj tvorita proračunski organ Evropske unije, dodelita 494 milijonov EUR finančne pomoči3.
In its request to mobilise 494 million euro, the Commission stated that the cost of essential emergency operations eligible under Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2012/20024 had been estimated by the Italian authorities at 2 004 million euro, the largest share being due to rescue services and, in particular, provisional housing. 
Komisija je v zahtevi o dodelitvi 494 milijonov EUR navedla, da stroški bistvenih nujnih ukrepov, upravičenih v skladu s členom 3(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2012/2002,4 po oceni italijanskih organov znašajo 2 004 milijone EUR, od tega največji delež za reševalne službe in zlasti za začasno nastanitev.
The Commission also stated that the Italian authorities declared that they were exploring possibilities with a view to financing part of the reconstruction beyond emergency operations through relevant operational programmes co-financed by the Structural Funds5. 
Navedla je tudi, da so italijanski organi izjavili, da razmišljajo o možnostih financiranja dela obnove, ki presega nujne ukrepe, v okviru ustreznih operativnih programov, ki se sofinancirajo iz strukturnih skladov5.
1 COM(2011) 136 final of 23 March 2011, ‘Report from the Commission — European Union Solidarity Fund — Annual report 2009’, p. 
1 COM(2011) 136 final z dne 23. marca 2011– Poročilo Komisije – Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije – Letno poročilo 2009, str.
2 COM(2011) 136 final, p. 
2 COM(2011) 136 final, str.
3 COM(2011) 136 final, p. 
3 COM(2011) 136 final, str.
6. 4 Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 
6. 4 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (UL L 311, 14.11.2002, str.
5 COM(2009) 448 final of 28 August 2009, ‘Preliminary draft amending budget No 9 to the general budget 2009’. 
3). 5 COM(2009) 448 final z dne 28. avgusta 2009 – Predhodni predlog spremembe proračuna št.
9 Result of the survey Private buildings Public buildings Cultural heritage Safe (A) 52,0 % 53,6 % 24,1 % Partially or temporarily unsafe (B, C) 15,9 % 25,2 % 22,2 % Totally unsafe (E) or unsafe because of external risks (F) 32,1 % 21,2 % 53,7 % Number of items tested 71 302 2 219 1 800 Special Report No 24/2012 – The European Union Solidarity Fund’s response to the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake: the relevance and cost of operations 
Rezultat pregleda Zasebne stavbe Javne stavbe Kulturna dediščina Varno (A) 52,0 % 53,6 % 24,1 % Delno ali začasno nevarno (B, C) 15,9 % 25,2 % 22,2 % Skrajno nevarno (E) ali nevarno zaradi zunanjih tveganj (F) 32,1 % 21,2 % 53,7 % Število pregledanih enot 71 302 2 219 1 800 Posebno poročilo št.24/2012 – Odziv Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije na potres v Abrucih leta 2009: ustreznost in stroški ukrepov
The implementation agreement6 was concluded on 11 November 2009 and the grant was paid out on 30 November 20097. 
Sporazum o izvajanju6 je bil sklenjen 11. novembra 2009, nepovratna sredstva pa so bila izplačana 30. novembra 20097.
According to the implementation agreement, the 494 million euro grant (see Table 2) was to be used for: — initial emergency operations; the total cost of initial assistance to the population was 653 million euro8, out of which the indicative amount of 50 million euro was financed by the EUSF; — the MAP project (covering the provision of smaller temporary housing units for up to 7 000 people) and the MUSP project (covering the provision of temporary schools for some of the over 15 000 schoolchildren affected by the earthquake); the total cost of the MAP and MUSP projects was 321 million euro9, of which the indicative amount of 94 million euro was financed by the EUSF; — the CASE housing project, consisting of temporary houses for at least 15 000 residents of L’Aquila; the total cost of this project was 810 million euro10, of which the indicative amount of 350 million euro was financed by the EUSF. 
V skladu s sporazumom o izvajanju naj bi bila nepovratna sredstva v višini 494 milijonov EUR (glej tabelo 2) porabljena za: — začetne nujne ukrepe; skupni strošek začetne pomoči prebivalstvu je znašal 653 milijonov EUR8, od katerih je bil okvirni znesek 50 milijonov EUR financiran iz SSEU; — projekt MAP (ki je zajemal zagotovitev manjših začasnih stanovanjskih enot za do 7 000 ljudi) in projekt MUSP (ki je zajemal zagotovitev začasnih šol za nekatere od več kot 15 000 v potresu prizadetih šolskih otrok); skupni strošek za projekta MAP in MUSP je bil 321 milijonov EUR9, od katerih je bil okvirni znesek 94 milijonov EUR financiran iz SSEU; — stanovanjski projekt CASE za začasna bivališča za vsaj 15 000 prebivalcev L'Aquile; skupni strošek tega projekta je bil 810 milijonov EUR10, od katerih je bil okvirni znesek 350 milijonov EUR financiran iz SSEU. 6 Sporazum o izvajanju št.
7 COM(2011) 136 final, p. 
7 COM(2011) 136 final, str.