natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Xiii. as for the recommendation that the commission should define and assess the Eu needs for improving the economic value of the forests, as well as clearly define the key features, the commission agrees that it should continue to define and assess the need to improve the economic value of forests in the Eu, in such a way as to justify in general terms the inclusion of relevant support in rural development policy. it considers that studies already available indicate needs in general terms at Eu level.2 2 these studies include (among others): ‘prospects for the market supply of wood and other forest products from areas with fragmented forest-ownership structures’; http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/supply-wood/index_ en.htm; ‘Good practice guidance on the sustainable mobilisation of wood in Europe’; http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/fore/publi/forest_brochure_en.pdf and ‘study of the Effects of Globalization on the Economic Viability of Eu forestry’; http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/viability_forestry/index_ en.htm Reply of the CoMMISSIoN the commission considers that more specific needs should continue to be assessed and defined at national and programme level by the competent national and regional authorities. the commission believes it should continue to define basic eligibility conditions at Eu level, but that more precise eligibility conditions and selection criteria should be set within individual rdps. it believes that its proposals for a rural development policy for after 2013 follow this approach. 
V zvezi s priporočilom, da naj Komisija opredeli in oceni potrebe EU glede povečanja gospodarske vrednosti gozdov ter jasno opredeli ključne značilnosti, se Komisija strinja, da mora še naprej opredeljevati in ocenjevati potrebo glede povečanja gospodarske vrednosti gozdov v EU, da bi na splošno utemeljila vključitev ustrezne podpore v politiko razvoja podeželja. Poleg tega meni, da že objavljene študije kažejo na splošne potrebe na ravni EU2. 2 Te študije so (med drugim): „Prospects for the market supply of wood and other forest products from areas with fragmented forest-ownership structures“ (Možnosti za tržno dobavo lesa in drugih gozdnih proizvodov z območij z razdrobljeno strukturo lastništva gozdov) – http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/supply-wood/ index_en.htm; „Good practice guidance on the sustainable mobilisation of wood in Europe“ (Smernice za dobre prakse trajnostnega pridobivanja lesa v Evropi) – http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/fore/publi/forest_brochure_en.pdf; „Study of the Effects of Globalization on the Economic Viability of EU Forestry“ (Študija o učinkih globalizacije na gospodarsko izvedljivost gozdarstva EU) – http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/viability_forestry/ index_en.htm OdgOvOri KOmisije Komisija meni, da morajo pristojni nacionalni in regionalni organi še naprej ocenjevati in opredeljevati bolj specifične potrebe na nacionalni in programski ravni.
However, these data may be of a very basic nature and require significant processing to allow conclusions about increases in value. to compile result indicators such as ‘increase of gross value added (GVa)’, Ms have been invited3 to capture relevant information on GVa from the supported holdings when the application is approved and 2 years after the investment completion in order to integrate as much as possible the long-term effect of the investments. 
Vendar so lahko ti podatki zelo osnovni in zahtevajo znatno obdelavo, da bi bilo mogoče priti do sklepnih ugotovitev glede zvišanja vrednosti. Da bi se zbrali kazalniki rezultatov, kot je „zvišanje bruto dodane vrednosti“, so bile države članice pozvane3, da zberejo ustrezne informacije o bruto dodani vrednosti od podprtih posestev, ko je vloga odobrena in dve leti po zaključku naložb, da bi se čim bolj upošteval dolgoročni učinek naložb.
3 Working document providing guidance to Ms for the result indicator ‘increase of GVa’: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload. cfm?id=84053593-c697-ff89-Ed5c-51797d9754fd Reply of the CoMMISSIoN in practice, it has been difficult for managing authorities (Mas) to compile the necessary data and conduct the analysis required to establish values for these types of result indicators as part of their regular monitoring activities. therefore, for the next programming period, this task of the establishment of values for this indicator will rather be undertaken by the programme evaluators. the commission considers this a feasible and adequate approach. observations 20. during the formulation of the forestry-related measures, the commission used the analysis that was available. one of the main sources was the commission staff working document in annex to the communication on the implementation of the Eu forestry strategy of 10.3.2005 (sEc(2005) 333), which identified needs and strategic objectives. see paragraph 30 and the associated footnotes. 
3 Delovni dokument, ki vsebuje navodila državam članicam glede kazalnika rezultatov „zvišanje bruto dodane vrednosti“, na voljo na naslovu: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload. cfm?id=84053593-C697-FF89-ED5C-51797D9754FD OdgOvOri KOmisije Organom upravljanja je bilo v praksi težko zbrati potrebne podatke in izvesti analizo, ki je potrebna za določitev vrednosti za tovrstne kazalnike rezultatov, v okviru svojih rednih dejavnosti spremljanja. Zato bodo v naslednjem programskem obdobju vrednosti za ta kazalnik določali ocenjevalci programov. Komisija meni, da je to izvedljiv in ustrezen pristop.
21. the opinions to which the court refers were indeed not available in 2004. 
21. Mnenja, ki jih navaja Sodišče, leta 2004 dejansko niso bila na voljo.
However, the main substance of the opinions in question was already contained in the Eu forestry strategy (coM (1998) 649) and the subsequent related council resolution 99c56, which were available in 2004. among other things, the strategy sets out the extent of private forest ownership in the Eu (accounting for 65 % of total forest), the number of private owners and the resultant level of fragmentation. the commission proposal for the post-2013 rural development regulation took account of an sfc opinion from 2009 and the European parliament’s ‘report on the implementation of a European union forestry strategy’ (a6-0015/2006) of 2006. Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development 
Vendar je bilo glavno bistvo zadevnih mnenj že vsebovano v gozdarski strategiji EU (COM(1998) 649) in poznejši povezani Resoluciji Sveta 1999/C 56/01, ki sta bili na voljo v navedenem letu. V strategiji so med drugim določeni obseg gozdnih površin v zasebni lasti v EU (ki predstavljajo 65 % vseh gozdnih površin), število zasebnih lastnikov in posledična stopnja razdrobljenosti. Komisija je v svojem predlogu uredbe o razvoju podeželja za obdobje po letu 2013 upoštevala mnenje stalnega odbora za gozdarstvo (SOG) iz leta 2009 in poročilo Evropskega parlamenta o izvajanju gozdarske strategije Evropske unije (A6-0015/2006) iz leta 2006.
43 22. the rdp of tuscany clearly states that support is available only in respect of forests owned by private owners or their associations, or by municipalities and their associations. 
43 22. V PRP za Toskano je jasno navedeno, da je podpora na voljo le za gozdove, ki so v lasti zasebnih lastnikov ali njihovih združenj ali občin in njihovih združenj.
Eligibility for support in the case of forests owned by national or regional governments but managed by other entities is a subject of debate in the ongoing formal discussions about the future cap. 
Upravičenost do podpore v primeru gozdov v lasti nacionalnih ali regionalnih vlad, ki jih upravljajo drugi subjekti, je ena od tem v okviru uradnih razprav o prihodnji SKP.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN the commission will also investigate with the council and the European parliament to what extent the desired relationship between investments in equipment and improvements to the economic value of forests could be clarified in the relevant legal acts. see reply to paragraph 35 concerning Hu. 
OdgOvOri KOmisije Komisija bo skupaj s Svetom in Evropskim parlamentom tudi proučila, v kolikšni meri bi bilo v ustreznih pravnih aktih mogoče pojasniti želeno razmerje med naložbami v opremo in povečanjem gospodarske vrednosti gozdov. Glej odgovor na odstavek 35 v zvezi z Madžarsko.
25. the commission considers that measure 123 requires a different approach because well-run larger companies active in processing and marketing should not normally experience particular difficulties in raising the necessary capital to make useful investments in those activities. the commission takes the view that, by contrast, no direct limit is necessary on the size of beneficiaries to which support could be paid under measure 122. 
25. Komisija meni, da je za ukrep 123 potreben drugačen pristop, ker dobro vodena večja podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo s predelavo in trženjem, običajno ne bi smela imeti posebnih težav pri zbiranju potrebnega kapitala za koristne naložbe v navedene dejavnosti.
With regard to increasing the economic value of forests, support is often needed for large beneficiaries as well as for small ones given that the relevant operations supported by measure 122 are often unprofitable in the short term, even in the case of large beneficiaries. the economic value and performance of a holding depends on many factors besides size. therefore, the assessment of which categories of forest should and should not be supported — including in terms of size — is best made at rdp level. 
V nasprotju s tem Komisija meni, da ni potrebna neposredna omejitev velikosti upravičencev, ki bi se jim lahko dodelila podpora iz ukrepa 122. V zvezi s povečanjem gospodarske vrednosti gozdov je podpora pogosto potrebna tako za velike kot tudi za male upravičence, saj so zadevne operacije, podprte iz ukrepa 122, kratkoročno pogosto nedobičkonosne, tudi v primeru velikih upravičencev.
Member states and regions are indeed expected to set additional conditions for eligibility for support under this measure within their programmes as necessary, according to the circumstances of the programming area. 
Od držav članic in regij se dejansko pričakuje, da v svojih programih po potrebi in glede na okoliščine programske površine določijo dodatne pogoje za upravičenost do podpore iz tega ukrepa.
With regard to the particular case of sE, the commission refers the court to its reply to paragraph 24 — concerning the unusually favourable conditions enjoyed by the sE forestry sector. 
V zvezi s posebnim primerom Švedske Komisija opozarja Sodišče na svoj odgovor na odstavek 24, ki se nanaša na nenavadno ugodne pogoje švedskega gozdarskega sektorja.
23. in forest science and practice the concept of ‘economic value of forests’ is well recognised, and a set of operations leading to a likely increase in value in the long term is also well recognised. 
23. V gozdarstvu in gozdarski praksi je zamisel „gospodarske vrednosti gozdov“ dobro znana, pri čemer enako velja tudi za niz operacij, ki prispevajo k verjetnemu dolgoročnemu zvišanju vrednosti.
Ms can tailor this set of operations to their own circumstances. some indication as to the types of project that may be financed under the heading of improving the economic value of forests is suggested by the chapeau of article 20(b) of regulation 1698/2005 which refers to ‘restructuring and developing physical potential and promoting innovation’. the ‘potential’ economic value of a forest stand may depend on the possible use of a forest and its socio-economic and technological environment. this argues against defining ‘economic value’ too narrowly. finally, the common Monitoring and Evaluation framework sets out a result indicator ‘increase in gross value added in supported holdings’. this contributes to a notion of what the measure should achieve. 
Države članice lahko ta niz operacij prilagodijo glede na lastne okoliščine. O nekaterih vrstah projektov, ki se lahko financirajo v okviru naslova povečanja gospodarske vrednosti gozdov, je mogoče sklepati iz uvodnega besedila člena 20(b) Uredbe št. 1698/2005, ki navaja „prestrukturiranje in razvoj fizičnega potenciala ter [...] spodbujanje inovativnosti“. „Potencialna“ gospodarska vrednost gozdnega sestoja je lahko odvisna od morebitne uporabe gozda ter njegovega socialno-ekonomskega in tehnološkega okolja.
24. additional guidance on the term ‘forestry holding’ may be needed for the future. to the extent that the equipment is used primarily for the purposes of managing the investor’s holding and the excess capacity is not such as to imply a disproportionate purchase for this purpose this investment should be considered as being made at the level of the holding. 
24. V prihodnosti bodo morda potrebna dodatna navodila glede pojma „gozdna posest“. Če se oprema uporablja predvsem za upravljanje vlagate-ljeve posesti in prekomerna zmogljivost ni takšna, da bi kazala na nesorazmeren nakup za ta namen, bi bilo treba to naložbo obravnavati kot izvedeno na ravni posesti.
28. the requirement of optimising the allocation of resources is not stated explicitly in the legislation, but is nonetheless implied. 
28. Zahteva glede optimizacije dodeljevanja virov v zakonodaji ni izrecno navedena, vendar je kljub temu implicirana.
Besides analysis provided in rdps, Ms provided analysis of their situation in their national strategy plans (nsps). in several cases they referred in these to their national forest programmes/plans or equivalent instrument as the main basis of their forestry-related policies. 
Poleg analize iz PRP so države članice analizirale svoje razmere v okviru svojih nacionalnih strateških načrtov. V slednjih so se v več primerih sklicevali na svoje nacionalne pro-grame/načrte za gozdove ali enakovredne instrumente kot glavno podlago svojih politik v zvezi z gozdovi.
29. the commission notes that the principle of subsidiarity hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions in respect of the points raised — in line, for example, with the European parliament’s ‘report on the implementation of a European union forestry strategy’ (a6-0015/2006). 
29. Komisija ugotavlja, da načelo subsidiarnosti omogoča državam članicam in regijam znatno diskrecijo v zvezi z izpostavljenimi točkami, na primer v skladu s poročilom Evropskega parlamenta o izvajanju gozdarske strategije Evropske unije (A6-0015/2006).
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN the authorities of Hungary4, tuscany5, slovenia6, austria7 and Galicia8 all made reasonable attempts at a suitably specific identification of needs which allowed a link to be made to measure 122. 
OdgOvOri KOmisije Madžarski4, toskanski5, slovenski6, avstrijski7 in galicijski8 organi so poskušali na razumen način in dovolj specifično določiti potrebe, ki so omogočale povezavo z ukrepom 122.
4 as for Hungary, the nHrdp (new Hungary rural development programme) reads: ‘Because of recent privatisation of the forests (40 % of the forests have been privatised) the most urgent need is therefore the modernisation of machinery and equipment of the private forests.’therefore the nHrdp identifies specific needs for private forests and targets the support to private forests of at least 50 ha where forest management based on a forest management plan is ensured. 
4 V zvezi z Madžarsko je v NHRDP (novi program razvoja podeželja Madžarske) navedeno, da je zaradi nedavne privatizacije gozdov (privatiziranih je bilo 40 % gozdov) najbolj nujno, da se posodobita mehanizacija in oprema, ki se uporabljata v zasebnih gozdovih. Tako so v NHRDP določene specifične potrebe za zasebne gozdove, pri čemer je program usmerjen v podporo zasebnim gozdovom s površino vsaj 50 ha, kadar je gospodarjenje z gozdovi zagotovljeno na podlagi načrta za gospodarjenje z gozdovi.
5 as for italy (tuscany), much of the relevant analysis is in fact contained in the related national strategic plan (nsp). the italian nsp provides a clear sWot analysis on forests and establishes a series of related objectives, e.g. promotion of energy saving; modernisation of machinery and equipment of the private forests — which have a clear link to measure 122. 
5 V zvezi z Italijo (Toskano) je velik del ustrezne analize dejansko vsebovan v ustreznem nacionalnem strateškem načrtu. V italijanskem nacionalnem strateškem načrtu sta določena jasna analiza SWOT v zvezi z gozdovi in niz s tem povezanih ciljev, kot sta npr. spodbujanje varčevanja z energijo ter posodobitev mehanizacije in opreme, ki se uporabljata v zasebnih gozdovih, ki so jasno povezani z ukrepom 122.
6 as for slovenia, the rdp provides for a detailed ‘analysis of the situation in the light of strengths and weaknesses’ in respect of the forestry sector (chapter 3.1.2). it looks at specific features of the forestry sector in slovenia and suggests improvements. 
6 V zvezi s Slovenijo je v PRP zagotovljena podrobna „analiza položaja z vidika prednosti in pomanjkljivosti“ v zvezi z gozdarskim sektorjem (poglavje 3.1.2). V njej so obravnavane posamezne značilnosti slovenskega gozdarskega sektorja in predlagane izboljšave.
Low labour performance characterises the sector and the situation of forests can be improved by better accessibility of forests, e.g. providing forest roads and trails. in addition, weak and inadequate infrastructure and insufficient equipment for forestry work are mentioned as reasons for high management costs. 
Za sektor je značilna nizka produktivnost dela, pri čemer bi bilo mogoče razmere v gozdarstvu izboljšati z večjo odprtostjo gozdov, npr. z gozdnimi cestami in vlakami. Poleg tega sta kot razloga za visoke stroške gospodarjenja navedeni slaba in neustrezna infrastruktura ter nezadostna opremljenost za dela v gozdu.
7 as for austria, the rdp identifies the following needs: (a) to increase the economic and ecological value of forests by reinforcing a mixed stand composition (chapter 3.1.3, p. 
7 V zvezi z Avstrijo sta v PRP določeni naslednji potrebi: (a) povečanje gospodarske in ekološke vrednosti gozdov s krepitvijo mešane sestave sestojev (poglavje 3.1.3, str.
34); (b) to enhance the competitiveness of the forestry sector (chapter 3.2.2.1, p. 
34) ter (b) povečanje konkurenčnosti gozdarskega sektorja (poglavje 3.2.2.1, str.
63). this shall be achieved by increasing the availability of the raw material wood and, consequently, increasing the energy supply. it has been found that M 122 in the table on page 64 (sWot) was omitted due to an editorial mistake. this will be corrected by introducing it in the frame of the next programme modification. 
63). To bo doseženo z večjo razpoložljivostjo lesa kot surovine in posledično z večjo oskrbo z energijo.
8 as for Galicia, the specific needs for the forestry sector identified in the sWot analysis, such as the small economic dimension of forest holdings (p. 
8 V zvezi z Galicijo so specifične potrebe za gozdarski sektor, ki so bile ugotovljene v analizi SWOT, na primer majhna gospodarska razsežnost gozdnih posestev (str.
45 rdp) are directly linked with and addressed by measure 122. the need to increase the economic dimension of forests is clearly recognised within the rational for intervention of measure 122. 
45 PRP), neposredno povezane in obravnavane z ukrepom 122. Potreba po povečanju gospodarske razsežnosti gozdov je jasno določena v utemeljitvi posega z ukrepom 122.
Making forests more open/accessible is described as an opportunity to lower the cost of obtaining wood and therefore to help to increase income from forests. 
Večja odprtost/dostopnost gozdov je opisana kot možnost za znižanje stroškov pridobivanja lesa, kar naj bi prispevalo k povečanju dohodka iz gozdov.
However, with respect to a separate analysis of needs based on types of beneficiaries this was not a legal requirement and slovenia did not provide such an analysis. 
Ker pa ločena analiza potreb na podlagi vrst upravičencev ni bila pravna zahteva, Slovenija takšne analize ni zagotovila.
While the weaknesses were not explicitly mentioned in the austrian rdp, these weaknesses were identified in the case of austria as: limited profitability of small forests and small availability of biomass. as a consequence, the potential competitiveness is reduced. the experience gained during the previous programming period led the managing authority to expect that about 50 000 ha would be covered. this omission will be corrected by including them in the next programme modification. 
Čeprav v avstrijskem PRP slabosti niso izrecno navedene, je bilo v primeru Avstrije ugotovljeno, da se slabosti nanašajo na omejeno dobičkonosnost majhnih gozdov in nizko razpoložljivost biomase. Zaradi tega je potencialna konkurenčnost manjša. Na podlagi izkušenj iz prejšnjega programskega obdobja je organ upravljanja pričakoval, da bo zajetih približno 50 000 ha.
31. the commission considers that the information gained through the Eu forestry strategy implementation report preparation, the continuous discussion with stakeholder representatives (e.g. through the advisory group on forestry and cork) and the series of bilateral negotiations with Member states and regions provided an adequate basis for approving rural development programmes. please also see reply to paragraph 30. 
31. Komisija meni, da se je z informacijami, pridobljenimi med pripravo poročila o izvajanju gozdarske strategije EU, stalnimi razpravami s predstavniki zainteresiranih strani (npr. v okviru svetovalne skupine za gozdarstvo in pluto) ter nizom dvostranskih pogajanj z državami članicami in regijami zagotovila ustrezna podlaga za odobritev programov razvoja podeželja.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 32. the commission notes that the principle of subsidiarity hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions in respect of the points raised — in line, for example, with the European parliament’s ‘report on the implementation of a European union forestry strategy’ (a6-0015/2006). 
Komisija ugotavlja, da načelo subsidiarnosti državam članicam in regijam omogoča znatno diskrecijo v zvezi z izpostavljenimi točkami, na primer v skladu s poročilom Evropskega parlamenta o izvajanju gozdarske strategije Evropske unije (A6-0015/2006).
Various points should be borne in mind with regard to the particular cases of Bulgaria9 (which had in fact declared some expenditure), romania10 and Greece11. 
V zvezi s posebnimi primeri Bolgarije9 (ki je dejansko prijavila nekaj odhodkov), Romunije10 in Grčije11 je treba upoštevati različne točke.