natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annexes Annex I — Commission and INEA responsibilities in the area of CEF management 42 Other parties contracted by INEA INEA actions Contribution to preparation of work programme Work programme Definition of selection and award criteria Exploitation of synergies Definition & adoption of Work Programme (WP) CEF committees Preparation of call text Communication actions (Info Day) Helpdesk Calls for proposals Collaboration on Info Days Feed-back on the text of calls External experts, obs ervers Eligibility and admissibility checks Selection of evaluators Organisation of evaluations Information to applicants Project selection Final selection of projects Reporting to Member States Other DGs, CEF committees Single contact point for applicants Signature of grant agreements Communication actions Grant agreement Model grant agreements Other DGs, Legal Service Audit firms Communication actions Payments & recoveries Technical and financial supervision of projects Audits Project follow-up Synergies between H2020 & CEF Project portfolio reviews Tailored reports (incl. to Corridor coordinators) Statistics Feedback to stakeholders Monitoring of the Agency Stakeholder consultations Dissemination of WP results Project lifecycle Action by parent DGs Other parties at request of parent DGs Source: ECA. 
Priloge Priloga I – Odgovornosti Komisije in agencije INEA pri upravljanju IPE 44 Drugi udeleženci, ki jih najame INEA Ukrepi agencije INEA prispevek k pripravi delovnega programa delovni program opredelitev meril za izbor in dodelitev sredstev izkoriščanje sinergij opredelitev in sprejetje delovnega programa odbori IPE Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče priprava besedila razpisa ukrepi obveščanja (informativni dan) služba za pomoč uporabnikom razpisi za zbiranje predlogov sodelovanje pri informativnih dnevih povratne informacije v zvezi z besedili razpisov zunanji strokovnjaki, opazovalci preverjanja upravičenosti in dopustnosti izbira ocenjevalcev organizacija ocenjevanj obveščanje vložnikov izbira projektov končni izbor projektov poročanje državam članicam drugi generalni direktorati,odboriIPE enotna kontaktna točka za vložnike sklepanje sporazumov o nepovratnih sredstvih ukrepi obveščanja sporazum o nepovratnih sredstvih vzorčni sporazumi o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev drugi generalni direktorati, pravna služba revizijske družbe ukrepi obveščanja plačila in izterjave tehnični in finančni nadzor projektov revizije nadaljnje spremljanje projekta sinergije med programoma Obzorje 2020 in IPE pregledi portfelja projektov prilagojena poročila (vklj. s koordinatorji za koridorje) statistični podatki povratne informacije za deležnike spremljanje agencije posvetovanja z deležniki razširjanje rezultatov delovnega programa Življenjski ciklus projekta Ukrepi pristojnih generalnih direktoratov Drugi udeleženci na zahtevo pristojnih generalnih direktoratov
CEF-T: Connecting Europe Facility – Transport. CHAFEA - Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency: the body set up by the European Commission to manage four EU programmes on its behalf: Health Programme; Consumer Programme; Better Training for Safer Food initiative – BTSF; Promotion of Agricultural Products Programme. 
Glosar in kratice CHAFEA – Izvajalska agencija za potrošnike, zdravje, kmetijstvo in hrano: organ, ki ga je Evropska komisija ustanovila za upravljanje štirih programov EU v svojem imenu: programa ukrepov na področju zdravja, programa varstva potrošnikov, pobude za boljše usposabljanje za varnejšo hrano in programa za promocijo kmetijskih proizvodov.
EACEA - Education, Audio-visual and Culture Executive Agency: body set up by the Commission to manage funding, on its behalf, for education, culture, audio-visual, sport, citizenship and volunteering. 
EACEA – Izvajalska agencija za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno področje in kulturo: organ, ki ga je Komisija ustanovila, da v njenem imenu upravlja sredstva za izobraževanje, kulturo, avdiovizualno področje, šport, državljanstvo in prostovoljstvo.
EASME - Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: body set up by the Commission to manage, on its behalf, several EU programmes in the fields of SME support and innovation, environment, climate action, energy and maritime affairs. 
EASME – Izvajalska agencija za mala in srednja podjetja: organ, ki ga je ustanovila Komisija, da v njenem imenu upravlja več programov EU na področju podpore malim in srednjim podjetjem in inovacij v zvezi z njimi, okolja, podnebnih ukrepov, energetike in pomorskih zadev.
ERCEA - European Research Council Executive Agency: body set up by the Commission to implement the ERC strategy set by the Scientific Council, with responsibility for the day-to-day administration of grants. 
ERCEA – Izvajalska agencija Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta: organ, ki ga je ustanovila Komisija, da izvaja strategijo Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta, ki jo je določil njegov znanstveni svet, in skrbi za tekoče upravljanje nepovratnih sredstev.
INEA - Innovation and Networks Executive Agency: the successor to the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-T EA), which was created by the Commission in 2006 to manage the technical and financial implementation of the TEN-T programme. 
INEA – Izvajalska agencija za inovacije in omrežja: naslednica Izvajalske agencije za vseevropsko prometno omrežje (TEN-T EA), ki jo je Komisija ustanovila leta 2006 za upravljanje tehničnega in finančnega izvajanja svojega programa vseevropskega prometnega omrežja (TEN-T).
INEA, headquartered in Brussels, officially commenced its activities of implementing parts of the CEF, H2020, and legacy programmes (TEN-T and Marco Polo 2007-2013) on 1 January 2014. KPI: key performance indicator. 
Agencija INEA, ki ima sedež v Bruslju, je uradno začela delovati 1. januarja 2014, da bi izvajala dele IPE, programa Obzorje 2020 in programov iz preteklega obdobja (TEN-T in Marco Polo za obdobje 2007–2013).
PCIs - Projects of common interest: key infrastructure projects, especially cross-border projects that link the energy systems of EU countries. 
Projekti skupnega interesa: ključni infrastrukturni projekti, zlasti čezmejni, ki povezujejo energetske sisteme držav EU.
They benefit from faster and more efficient permit-granting procedures and improved regulatory treatment (by allocating costs according to the net benefits). 
Zanje veljajo hitrejši in učinkovitejši postopki za izdajo dovoljenj in izboljšana regulativna obravnava (z razporeditvijo stroškov na podlagi neto koristi).
They can also be supported under the CEF. 
Podprejo se lahko tudi v okviru IPE.
REA - Research Executive Agency: a body set up by the Commission in 2007 to implement parts of the 7th Framework Programme for Research & Innovation (FP7). 
REA – Izvajalska agencija za raziskave: organ, ki ga je leta 2007 ustanovila Komisija za izvajanje delov 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave in inovacije.
In 2013 its remit expanded to include managing much of Horizon 2020. 
Leta 2013 je postala pristojna tudi za upravljanje velikega dela programa Obzorje 2020.
S2R - Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking: a European rail initiative establish to seek focused research and innovation and market-driven solutions by accelerating the integration of new and advanced technologies into innovative rail product solutions. 
S2R – Skupno podjetje Shift2Rail: evropska železniška pobuda, ki se s pospeševanjem vključevanja novih in naprednih tehnologij v inovativne rešitve v železniškem prometu osredotoča na raziskave in inovacije ter tržno usmerjene rešitve.
TEN-T - Trans-European Transport Network: a set of planned road, rail, air and water infrastructure developments in implementation of the trans-European transport network policy The TEN-T networks are part of a wider system of Trans-European Networks (TENs), including a telecommunications network (eTEN) and a proposed energy network (TEN-E). 
TEN-T – vseevropsko prometno omrežje: sklop načrtovanih cestnih, železniških, zračnih in vodnih razvojnih projektov na področju infrastrukture, s katerimi se izvaja politiko vseevropskega prometnega omrežja. Omrežja TEN-T so del širšega sistema vseevropskih omrežij (TEN), vključno s telekomunikacijskim omrežjem (eTEN) in predlaganim energetskim omrežjem (TEN-E).
The development of the TEN-T infrastructure is closely linked to the implementation and further advancement of EU transport policy. 
Razvoj infrastrukture omrežij TEN-T je tesno povezan z izvajanjem in nadgradnjo prometne politike EU. 46
45 REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS “INEA: BENEFITS DELIVERED BUT CEF SHORTCOMINGS TO BE ADDRESSED” EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE NA POSEBNO POROČILO EVROPSKEGA RAČUNSKEGA SODIŠČA „INEA: ZAGOTOVLJENE KORISTI, VENDAR JE TREBA OBRAVNAVATI POMANJKLJIVOSTI V IPE“ POVZETEK III.
Second indent: The Commission believes that INEA’s performance indicators are adequate for the measurement of the performance of INEA in accordance with the mandate that it has received from the Commission. 
Druga alinea: Komisija meni, da so kazalniki smotrnosti agencije INEA primerni za merjenje smotrnosti delovanja agencije INEA v skladu z mandatom, ki ga je prejela od Komisije.
The Commission therefore considers that INEA’s performance indicators should be distinguished from the evaluation of the results of the programmes themselves. 
Komisija zato meni, da je treba kazalnike smotrnosti agencije INEA razlikovati od ocenjevanja rezultatov samih programov.
INEA’s performance indicators provide information on the yearly results in relation to the budget voted by the Budgetary Authority (i.e. absorption of funds). 
Kazalniki smotrnosti agencije INEA zagotavljajo informacije o letnih rezultatih v zvezi s proračunom, ki ga je izglasoval proračunski organ (tj. črpanje sredstev).
Fourth indent: Over the years, the CEF DGs have increased the coordination of their calls so as to ease the work-load of INEA. 
Četrta alinea: Z leti so generalni direktorati, pristojni za IPE, okrepili usklajevanje svojih razpisov, da bi zmanjšali delovno obremenitev agencije INEA.
Under CEF 2, the first multiannual work programme will include the timetable of the calls for proposals for the first three years of the programme, their topics and indicative budget as well as a prospective framework covering the entire programming period. 
V okviru IPE2 bo prvi večletni delovni program vključeval časovni razpored razpisov za zbiranje predlogov za prva tri leta programa, njihove teme in okvirni proračun ter predvideni okvir, ki bo zajemal celotno programsko obdobje.
First indent: The CEF DGs have already reviewed their individual evaluation and selection procedures and are preparing a common approach in view of CEF 2. 
Prva alinea: Generalni direktorati, pristojni za IPE, so že pregledali svoje postopke za ocenjevanje in izbiro ter pripravljajo skupen pristop za IPE2.
This will notably transpose the evaluation elements in article 13 of the draft CEF 2 Regulation into the award criteria. 
To bo zlasti preneslo elemente ocenjevanja iz člena 13 osnutka uredbe o IPE2 v merila za dodelitev.
Such common approach will also facilitate the migration of the CEF programme towards the eGrants IT module. 
Tak skupni pristop bo tudi olajšal prehod programa IPE na modul eGrants IT.
The 14 CEF-T projects mentioned by the ECA represent only 1,9% of the selected projects and 3% of total funding. 
14 projektov IPE-promet, ki jih omenja Evropsko računsko sodišče, predstavlja le 1,9 % izbranih projektov in 3% vsega financiranja.
As a norm, the selection of projects is aligned with the experts’ recommendation to retain projects for funding. 
Izbira projektov je praviloma usklajena s priporočilom strokovnjakov, da se projekti ohranijo za financiranje.
Third indent: The Commission underlines that the implementation of EU spending programmes for infrastructure in particular carries a certain degree of risk. 
Tretja alinea: Komisija poudarja, da izvajanje programov porabe EU za infrastrukturo prinaša določeno stopnjo tveganja.
The Commission considers that the inherent risk that CEF programmes may not be fully implemented is being continuously managed by the Commission and INEA. 
Komisija meni, da ona in agencija INEA stalno upravljata inherentno tveganje programov IPE, da morda ne bodo v celoti izvedeni.
Fourth indent: The front-loading of the CEF-T budget was a clear policy approach aimed at facilitating the economic recovery, supporting very significant cross-border infrastructure projects partly already funded under the TEN-T 2007-2013 programe, optimising budget absorption, and meeting the commitment to provide for the full execution of the Cohesion envelope budget (€ 11.3 billion) until end 2016 which was the deadline for the national envelopes (article 11(2) of the CEF Regulation). 
Četrta alinea: Dodelitev visokih deležev proračuna v zgodnjem obdobju instrumentu IPE-promet je bil jasen politični pristop, namenjen lajšanju gospodarskega okrevanja, podpiranju zelo pomembnih čezmejnih infrastrukturnih projektov, ki so se delno že financirali v okviru programa TEN-T v obdobju 2007–2013, optimizaciji črpanja proračuna in izpolnjevanju zaveze, da se zagotovi popolno izvrševanje proračuna za kohezijsko politiko (11,3 milijarde EUR) do konca leta 2016, tj. do roka za nacionalna sredstva (člen 11(2) uredbe o IPE).
Fifth indent: Active portfolio management should ensure the effective use of EU funds and this may include, where appropriate, extensions and rescoping of projects. 
Peta alinea: Aktivno upravljanje portfeljev bi moralo zagotoviti učinkovito uporabo sredstev EU, kar lahko po potrebi vključuje tudi razširitve in spremembe obsega projektov.
V. See Commission’s replies to Recommendations 1 to 5. 
V. Glej odgovore Komisije na priporočila 1 do 5.
The Commission acknowledges that coordination between executive agencies and joint undertakings (JU) could be increased in view of further developing structured measures. EN EN 1 
Komisija priznava, da bi se lahko usklajevanje med izvajalskimi agencijami in skupnimi podjetji povečalo zaradi nadaljnjega razvoja strukturiranih ukrepov. SL SL 1
EN EN Efforts in this regard are being deployed; in relation to Shift2Rail (S2R) JU, for instance, INEA is a member of the ERTMS Policy Board, where ERTMS and related technical matters are being coordinated. 
SL SL Za to potekajo intenzivna prizadevanja; v zvezi s skupnim podjetjem Shift2Rail (S2R) je agencija INEA na primer članica odbora za politiko ERTMS, kjer se usklajujejo ERTMS in s tem povezana tehnična vprašanja.
As soon as results from research projects managed by the S2R JU become available for deployment and as far as eligible under CEF, more cooperation will emerge. 
Takoj ko bodo rezultati raziskovalnih projektov, ki jih upravlja skupno podjetje S2R, na voljo za razširjanje in kolikor bo to upravičeno v okviru IPE, se bo sodelovanje povečalo.
This is the case for Air Traffic Management, where CEF implements the results of research SESAR projects supported by the SESAR JU. 
To velja za upravljanje zračnega prometa, kjer IPE izvaja rezultate raziskovalnih projektov SESAR, ki jih podpira skupno podjetje SESAR.
Furthermore, at least one key project (selected during the 2015 CEF Transport call) was jointly supported by INEA and the Fuel Cell Hydrogen Joint Undertaking according to the respective competencies. 
Poleg tega sta vsaj en ključni projekt (izbran na razpisu IPE-promet leta 2015) v skladu s svojimi pristojnostmi skupaj podprla agencija INEA in Skupno podjetje za gorivne celice in vodik.
Finally, INEA is also using expertise from regulatory agencies like ERA, EMSA and EASA during the evaluations of project proposals. 
Nazadnje, agencija INEA pri ocenjevanju projektnih predlogov uporablja tudi strokovno znanje regulativnih agencij, kot so ERA, EMSA in EASA.
Horizon 2020 is the biggest programme that has been delegated to Executive Agencies in terms of amount and various strands. 
Program Obzorje 2020 je največji program, ki je bil prenesen na izvajalske agencije prenesen v smislu obsega in različnih sklopov.
Not only Executive Agencies but also several DGs and Joint Undertakings are responsible for implementing parts of Horizon 2020. 
Za izvajanje delov programa Obzorje 2020 so odgovorni ne le izvajalske agencije, ampak tudi več generalnih direktoratov in skupnih podjetij.
At the time of the delegation of Horizon 2020 Energy to INEA and EASME, synergies were rather expected between the Horizon 2020 Energy strand in INEA with CEF Energy and between the Horizon 2020 Energy strand in EASME with Horizon 2020 Envirnoment and resources, LIFE and CIP Eco-innovation. 
V času prenosa programa Obzorja 2020–energija agenciji INEA in EASME so sinergije med sklopom Obzorje 2020-energija v agenciji INEA in IPE-energija ter med sklopom Obzorje 2020-energija v agenciji EASME in sklopom okolje in viri programa Obzorje 2020, programom LIFE ter programom za konkurenčnost in inovativnost na področju ekoinovacij precej pričakovane.
The Commission launched in September 2018 a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) that is studying various scenarios regarding the breakdown of future EU programmes (or strands of programmes) to be delegated to the various Executive Agencies 2021-2027. 
Komisija je septembra 2018 začela analizo stroškov in koristi, v okviru katere preučuje različne scenarije v zvezi z razčlenitvijo prihodnjih programov EU (ali njihovih sklopov) na posamezne dele, ki bodo preneseni na različne izvajalske agencije za obdobje 2021–2027.
The CBA will take into account several factors among which yielding savings, keeping agencies at a manageable size, limiting as far as possible the number of parent DGs and consistency in terms of targeted beneficiaries. 
Pri tej analizi bo upoštevala več dejavnikov, med katerimi so prihranki, ohranjanje obvladljive velikosti agencij, čim večja omejitev števila pristojnih generalnih direktoratov ter doslednost v smislu ciljnih upravičencev.
The Commission believes that INEA’s KPIs are adequate for measuring the performance of INEA in accordance with the mandate that it has received from the Commission. 
Komisija meni, da so ključni kazalniki smotrnosti agencije INEA primerni za merjenje smotrnosti delovanja agencije INEA v skladu z mandatom, ki ga je prejela od Komisije.
INEA’s performance indicators should therefore be distinguished from the indicators measuring the results of the programmes themselves, set by the co-legislators in the legal framework of the programmes. 
Kazalnike smotrnosti agencije INEA bi bilo zato treba razlikovati od kazalnikov, s katerimi se merijo rezultati samih programov in sta jih določila sozakonodajalca v pravnem okviru programov.
INEA’s KPIs provide information on the yearly results in relation to the budget voted by the Budgetary Authority (i.e. absorption of funds). 
Ključni kazalniki smotrnosti agencije INEA zagotavljajo informacije o letnih rezultatih v zvezi s proračunom, ki ga je izglasoval proračunski organ (tj. črpanje sredstev).
INEA’s current set of key performance indicators were designed to reflect the agency’s specific role but are similar to the KPIs used by the other executive agencies. 
Sedanji nabor ključnih kazalnikov smotrnosti agencije INEA je bil oblikovan tako, da odraža posebno vlogo agencije, vendar je podoben naboru ključnih kazalnikov smotrnosti, ki jih uporabljajo druge izvajalske agencije.
However, the Commission notes that there are significant differences between the programmes managed by different executive agencies that might explain use of different indicators. 
Vendar Komisija ugotavlja, da med programi, ki jih upravljajo različne izvajalske agencije, obstajajo znatne razlike, ki lahko pojasnijo uporabo različnih kazalnikov.
The Commission will, nevertheless, assess the scope for further improvement of indicators while keeping the total number of KPIs limited. 2 
Komisija bo kljub temu ocenila možnosti za nadaljnje izboljšanje kazalnikov, hkrati pa ohranila omejeno število ključnih kazalnikov smotrnosti. 2
EN EN 37. 
SL SL 37.
The Commission is currently assessing the possibilities to introduce additional flexibility mechanisms for staff allocation between programmes within a given executive agency in order to reach increased efficiency in its management. 
Komisija trenutno ocenjuje možnosti uvedbe dodatnih mehanizmov fleksibilnosti za razporejanje osebja med programi v posamezni izvajalski agenciji, da bi se povečala učinkovitost njenega upravljanja.
However, the Commission is bound by the respect of the budgetary principles set out in the Financial Regulation, and in particular the specification principle; any such flexibility will therefore need to be properly framed to ensure the respect of this principle. 
Vendar jo zavezuje spoštovanje proračunskih načel, določenih v finančni uredbi, zlasti načela specifikacije; zato bo morala biti vsaka taka fleksibilnost ustrezno urejena, da se zagotovi spoštovanje tega načela.
An analysis of the evaluation and selection procedures of the three CEF sectors has been carried out in the meantime and a common approach is being prepared in view of CEF 2. 
Medtem je bila opravljena analiza postopkov ocenjevanja in izbire v treh sektorjih IPE in za IPE2 se pripravlja skupni pristop.
Scoring considerations have a lesser impact because there is no ranking for CEF Transport. 
Pomisleki glede točkovanja imajo manjši vpliv, ker pri sklopu IPE-promet ni razvrščanja.
The experts’ recommendation does not only contain scores but also a qualitative appraisal by criterion which the Commission takes into account in its selection. 
Priporočilo strokovnjakov ne vsebuje le števila točk, temveč tudi kvalitativno oceno po merilu, ki ga Komisija upošteva pri izboru.
The Commission considers that the main reason for proposals recommended by the experts not being funded is the mismatch between the budget available and the demand for funding, not scoring considerations. 
Komisija meni, da je glavni razlog za to, da predlogi, ki jih priporočijo strokovnjaki, ne prejmejo financiranja, neskladnost med razpoložljivim proračunom in povpraševanjem po financiranju, ne pa pomisleki glede točkovanja.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 49 and 50: The Commission notes that the budget availability is a major difference between the three sectors. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 49 in 50: Komisija ugotavlja, da se razpoložljiva proračunska sredstva med temi tremi sektorji močno razlikujejo.
In transport even after the recommendations by the external experts, there is still a high oversubscription which constrains the Commission during the selection process to reject high-quality proposals. 
V sektorju IPE-promet je tudi po priporočilih zunanjih strokovnjakov še vedno veliko preveč prijavljenih projektov, kar omejuje Komisijo med izbirnim postopkom, tako da zavrača tudi visokokakovostne predloge.
To the contrary for the other two sectors, the pressure by over-subscription is less relevant, hence the reason for an apparent correlation. 
Nasprotno je v ostalih dveh sektorjih pritisk zaradi prevelikega števila prijavljenih projektov manj pomemben, to pa je razlog za očitno korelacijo.
As already indicated in paragraph 48, the 14 cases mentioned by the ECA of CEF-T selected projects which had not been recommended by the external experts represent only 1,9% of the selected projects and 3% of total funding. 
Kot je bilo že navedeno v odstavku 48, je 14 primerov izbranih projektov IPE-promet, ki jih je navedlo Evropsko računsko sodišče in jih niso priporočili zunanji strokovnjaki, predstavljalo le 1,9 % izbranih projektov in 3 % vsega financiranja.
The Commission considers that in all 14 cases the justification for selection is clearly outlined in the minutes of the selection committee and in the individual evaluation forms of the respective projects. 
Komisija meni, da je v vseh 14 primerih utemeljitev izbire jasno navedena v zapisniku izbirne komisije in v posameznih ocenjevalnih obrazcih zadevnih projektov.
The Commission nevertheless recognises that more detailed justifications could have been elaborated in this respect. 
Komisija kljub temu priznava, da bi bile lahko v zvezi s tem pripravljene podrobnejše utemeljitve.