natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The arrangements for advance disbursements have been reviewed in the new contract templates for financial instruments and result in a decreased level of prefinancing. 
Dogovori o vnaprejšnjih izplačilih so bili pregledani v okviru novih pogodbenih predlog za finančne instrumente in so privedli do zmanjšane ravni predfinanciranja.
Reply of the Commission 41 Box 3 The Commission proceeded in full compliance with the applicable rules and regulations. 
Odgovori Komisije 41 Okvir 3 Komisija je postopala popolnoma v skladu z veljav‐ nimi pravili in predpisi.
The disbursement arrangement explained in Box 3 was done in 2010. 
Dogovor o izplačilu, pojasnjen v okvirju 3, je bil sklenjen leta 2010.
For the NIF, the Commission has changed this disbursement policy in 2012. (cf. para‐ graph 32). 
Komisija je za NIF spremenila to izplačilno politiko leta 2012 (glej odstavek 32).
In addition, the assessment of this NIF project shall dully take into account the exceptional situation and events that took place in the partner country from January 2011 and that have had an impact on the implementaion of the project. 
Poleg tega se pri ocenjevanju tega projekta NIF ustrezno upoštevajo izredne razmere in dogodki, ki od januarja 2011 potekajo v partnerskih državah in so vplivali na izvajanje projekta.
34 Projects under these facilities are approved and selected directly by the European financial institu‐ tions in full compliance with the objectives, activi‐ ties and criteria established for the project. 
34 Projekte v okviru teh instrumentov neposredno odobrijo in izberejo evropske finančne institucije, in sicer popolnoma v skladu s cilji, dejavnostmi in merili, opredeljenimi za ta projekt.
The selection of the sub‐loans and guarantees is deter‐ mined by the project‐related parameters (detailed in the fiche), in particular those spelling out the goals pursued by the project. 
Izbira podposo‐ jil in jamstev je določena s parametri, povezanimi s projektom (več podrobnosti je v podatkovni poli), zlasti s tistimi, v katerih so navedeni cilji projekta.
Due diligence stand‐ ards of the financial institutions are applied during the approval and selection procedures. 
Standardi finančnih institucij v zvezi s primerno skrbnostjo se uporabljajo pri postopkih odobritve in izbire.
These pro‐ cedures follow an agreed and cost‐efficient division of labour among partners which include arrange‐ ments for the selection of the subordinated actions. 
Ti postopki so v skladu z dogovorjeno in stroškovno učinkovito delitvijo dela med part‐ nerji, ki vključujejo tudi dogovore o izbiri odvisnih ukrepov.
The eligible financial institutions report in detail on the projects included in the facility on a regular as well as on ad hoc basis or when requested by the Commission. 
Upravičene finančne institucije redno ali občasno ali na zahtevo Komisije podrobno poročajo o projektih, vključenih v instrument.
Box 4 The Commission considers that all necessary ele‐ ments were apparent in the grant application form of the NIF project of the SME Finance Facility. 
Okvir 4 Komisija meni, da so bili vsi potrebni elementi v obrazcu vloge za nepovratna sredstva za projekt NIF instrumenta za financiranje MSP jasni.
35 Following the project approval, the Union del‐ egations and/or the Commission Headquarters (depending on the scope of the project) secure adequate follow‐up. 
35 Delegacije Unije in/ali sedež Komisije (odvisno od obsega projekta) po odobritvi projekta zagotovijo ustrezno nadaljnje spremljanje.
Commission services are in regular contact with the Bank’s national offices in the relevant countries, meetings take place with the delegation and the local project coordinators of the lead financial insti‐ tutions. 
Službe Komisije so redno v stiku z nacionalnimi uradi bank v zadevnih državah, pri čemer sestanki potekajo z delegacijo in lokalnimi koordinatorji projektov vodilnih finančnih institucij.
The lead financial institutions have the con‐ tractual obligation to submit reports annually to the delegation. 
Slednje so pogodbeno obvezane, da vsako leto predložijo poročila delegaciji.
Furthermore, as foreseen in contracts signed within delegated cooperation, the Commis‐ sion is involved, informed and invited to monitoring missions carried out by the lead financial Institution on the ground. 
Poleg tega Komisija, kot je pred‐ videno v pogodbah, sklenjenih v okviru prenese‐ nega sodelovanja, sodeluje pri misijah spremljanja, ki jih izvajajo vodilne finančne institucije na ozem‐ lju, je o njih obveščena in k njim tudi povabljena.
The contractual arrangements are sufficiently clear for adequate monitoring. 
Pogodbeni dogovori so dovolj jasni za ustrezno spremljanje.
By increasing the earlier involvement of delega‐ tion in the process, follow up and monitoring will also increase. 
Z izboljšanim sodelovanjem delegacij v zgodnejših fazah postopka se bosta izboljšala tudi nadaljnje spremljanje in nadzor.
Instructions to delegations will be updated to this effect. 
Navodila za delegacije bodo v ta namen posodobljena.
36 The Commission acknowledges the reference to the ongoing work on results‐based indicators to be used by the finance institutions for monitoring and reporting purposes and stresses that perfor‐ mance monitoring is carried out by the lead finance institution. 
36 Komisija priznava sklicevanje na tekoče delo v zvezi s kazalniki, ki temeljijo na rezultatih, ki jih morajo finančne institucije uporabiti za spremljanje in poročanje, in poudarja, da spremljanje uspešnosti izvaja vodilna finančna institucija.
37 All the projects are submitted to monitoring and evaluation(s). 
37 Vsi projekti se spremljajo in vrednotijo.
Some mid‐term evaluations have been finalised, like in the case of NIF, or will be launched shortly, like in the case of LAIF. 
Nekatera vmesna vrednotenja so bila zaključena, na primer za NIF, ali pa se bodo kmalu začela, na primer za LAIF.
Reply of the Commission 42 42 (a) The possible financing without ITF contribution under the IMF programme had indeed a ceiling for non‐concessional lending (see Table 1 of the IMF Country Reports for 2009 and 2010), therefore any additional lending had to be concessional. 
Odgovori Komisije 42 42 (a) Za morebitno financiranje brez prispevka ITF v okviru programa MDS je dejansko obstajala zgornja meja v zvezi z neugodnimi posojili (glej tabelo 1 v poročilih MDS o posameznih državah za leti 2009 in 2010), zato je moralo biti vsako dodatno posojilo ugodno.
The decision of any given project being considered for concessional or not lending is a sovereign decision of Zambia, after discussion with the international community depending on the economics of each project. 
Zambija po razpravi z mednarod‐ no skupnostjo suvereno odloča o tem, ali se za kateri koli projekt odobri dodelitev ugodnega poso‐ jila ali ne, in sicer glede na ekonomičnost posamez‐ nega projekta.
42 (b) The EDF grant alone had proven insufficient to close the financing of the projects. 
42 (b) Sama nepovratna sredstva Evropskega razvoj‐ nega sklada (ERS) so se izkazala za nezadostna za dokončno financiranje projektov.
The additional funding, necessary to close the funding gap, was made possible only by the mobilisation of financial institutions resources through the ITF contribution. 
Dodatno financi‐ ranje, potrebno za zapolnitev vrzeli v financiranju, je omogočila le mobilizacija sredstev finančnih institucij v okviru prispevka ITF.
42 (c) Grants may have high added value even if small in size, for example in completing a financing gap, in improving the project quality, etc. 
42 (c) Nepovratna sredstva lahko imajo visoko dodano vrednost, čeprav so nizka, na primer pri zapolnitvi finančne vrzeli, izboljšanju kakovosti projekta ipd.
In three of these cases the grant helped soften the overall financial conditions, as the financing package proposed by the co‐financiers was not considered fully accepta‐ ble by the borrower. 
V treh od teh primerov so nepovratna sredstva pomagala omiliti splošne finančne pogoje, saj se finančni paket, ki so ga predlagali ponudniki sofinanciranja, posojilojemalcu ni zdel popolnoma sprejemljiv.
For the other project, the grant allowed the increase of the potential impact of the projects including the financial benefits. 
Pri drugem projektu so nepovratna sredstva omogočila povečanje potencialnega učinka projektov, vključno s finančnimi koristmi.
42 (d) The Commission does not share the Court’s con‐ clusion. 
42 (d) Komisija se ne strinja z zaključkom Sodišča.
The final beneficiary could have chosen another alternative that would have been more profitable but would have brought negative envi‐ ronmental impacts. 
Končni upravičenec bi lahko izbral drugo možnost, ki bi bila donosnejša, vendar bi negativno vplivala na okolje.
The ITF grant helped facilitate the investment into the environmentally preferred option and compensating for the higher investment costs. 
Nepovratna sredstva ITF so pomagala spodbuditi naložbe v najprimernejše možnosti za okolje in nadomestiti višje naložbene stroške.
Furthermore, the Commission would like to stress that: (i) ROM procedures for the DEVCO‐managed re‐ gional investment facilities are the same as for the other DEVCO projects; and (ii) DEVCO takes the necessary actions to address ROM results: for projects which have undergone the ROM process the results are sent to the EU delegation/units in Headquarters involved in the project management. 
Poleg tega želi Komisija poudariti, da: (i) so postopki spremljanja, usmerjenega k rezulta‐ tom (ROM), za regionalne naložbene instrumen‐ te, ki jih upravlja GD DEVCO, enaki kot pri drugih projektih GD DEVCO; in (ii) GD DEVCO sprejme potrebne ukrepe v zvezi z re‐ zultati ROM, pri čemer se za projekte, za katere je bil izveden postopek ROM, rezultati pošljejo de‐ legaciji/enotam EU na sedežu, ki sodelujejo pri upravljanju projektov.
A reply is expected from the delegation and is usually submitted to the lead finance institution. 
Od delegacije se pričakuje odgovor, ki se običajno predloži vodilni finanč‐ ni instituciji.
If necessary a contradic‐ tory meeting is organised aiming at clarifying the findings of the ROM. 
Po potrebi se organizira soočenje, katerega cilj je pojasniti ugotovitve ROM.
Additionally the Commis‐ sion’s representatives are meeting with the con‐ sultants who carried out the ROM visits for regular debriefing sessions in order to be informed about the situation on the ground. 
Poleg tega se na rednih informativnih sestankih zastop‐ niki Komisije sestanejo s svetovalci, ki so izvedli obiske ROM, da bi se seznanili z razmerami na ozemlju.
It is envisaged to review the management of ITF projects in the future in order to possibly align it with the other facilities. 
V prihodnosti je predviden pregled upravljanja pro‐ jektov ITF za njegovo morebitno uskladitev z dru‐ gimi instrumenti.
Common reply to paragraphs 39–42 39 The Commission does not share the analysis of the Court on the demonstration of the need for grant support to enable the loan. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavke od 39 do 42 39 Komisija se ne strinja z analizo Sodišča glede dokazovanja, da je za pridobitev posojila potrebna dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev.
The grant appli‐ cation form provides the basis for assessment, which is a considered judgement based on inputs from thematic and geographic units, as well as EU delegations and the secretariat, often supple‐ mented by additional queries. 
Obrazec vloge za nepovratna sredstva zagotavlja podlago za oceno, tj. premišljeno presojo, ki temelji na prispevkih tematskih in geografskih enot in tudi delegacij EU ter sekretariata, ki se pogosto dopolni z dodatnimi poizvedbami.
The assessment of the Commission supported by technical meetings with financial institutions and operational Boards with the presence of the Member States is solid and well grounded. 
Ocena Komisije, podprta s tehničnimi sestanki med finančnimi institucijami in operativ‐ nimi odbori, in sicer ob prisotnosti držav članic, je trdna in utemeljena.
The Commission considers that the selection process of the grants gives sufficient assurance and proof of its need. 
Komisija meni, da postopek izbire v zvezi z nepovratnimi sredstvi zadostno zagotavlja in dokazuje, da je navedena ocena potrebna.
42 The Commission does not share this analysis for the following reasons: 
42 Komisija se s to analizo ne strinja iz naslednjih razlogov:
Reply of the Commission 43 42 (e) The Commission does not share the Court’s conclu‐ sion for which there is insufficient evidence. 
Odgovori Komisije 43 42 (e) Komisija se ne strinja z zaključkom Sodišča, za kate‐ rega ni zadostnih dokazov.
The NIF grant was necessary to unlock the overall investment package of the project and was com‐ pletely in line with policy objectives of the EU and of the partner country. 
Nepovratna sredstva NIF so bila potrebna za spro‐ stitev celotnega naložbenega paketa projekta ter so bila popolnoma v skladu s cilji politike EU in part‐ nerske države.
42 (f) The Commission does not share the assessment. 
42 (f) Komisija se ne strinja z oceno.
It implies that the grant was required for the related loans to be accepted by the beneficiary, and that the blended package was comparable with other financial offers and was not overly subsidised. 
Slednja bi pomenila, da so bila nepovratna sredstva potrebna za pove‐ zana posojila, ki jih prejme upravičenec, ter da je bil kombinirani paket primerljiv z drugimi finančnimi ponudbami in ni bil prekomerno subvencioniran.
42 (g) This observation does not take into account that the ‘unsubsidised’ product operated on the assumption that the subsidy would come. 
42 (g) Pri tem opažanju se ne upošteva, da je „nesubven‐ cionirani“ produkt deloval s predpostavko, da bo subvencija dodeljena.
The NIF contribution in such a scheme is certainly needed for the EFIs to be able to provide loans at a rate that incentivise banks to on‐lend to SMEs. 
V takem sistemu evropske finančne institucije prispevek NIF vsekakor potre‐ bujejo, da bi lahko zagotovile posojila po obrestni meri, ki spodbujajo banke, da posojena sredstva nadalje posodijo MSP.
The fact that the NIF con‐ tribution is not (or partly) spent is rather a sign of success. 
Nasprotno je dejstvo, da pri‐ spevek NIF ni (ali je delno) porabljen, znak uspeha.
It paves the way for a follow‐up facility with a lower level of NIF contribution (without implying that the NIF grant should be lower in the case of another first operation in a country). 
To dejstvo je podlaga za naslednji instrument z nižjo ravnjo prispevka NIF (ne da bi to pomenilo, da bi morala biti nepovratna sredstva NIF nižja v pri‐ meru naslednjega prvega projekta v državi).
44 The Commission is proactively influencing the set‐ up of the projects. 
44 Komisija dejavno vpliva na vzpostavitev projek‐ tov.
The type of influence will very much depend on the type of project since projects have different objectives and different expected impacts. 
Vrsta vpliva bo v veliki meri odvisna od vrste projekta, saj imajo projekti različne cilje in različne pričakovane učinke.
Blending projects are set up in a context of partnership and of sharing of responsibilities among donors. 
Projekti, ki se financirajo s kom‐ biniranjem virov sredstev, so vzpostavljeni v okviru partnerstva in na podlagi delitve odgovornosti med donatorji.
The Commission has a key role in this partnership, exercising a wide influence in all relevant aspects of the projects. 
V tem partnerstvu ima Komisija ključno vlogo in širok vpliv pri vseh pomembnih vidikih projektov.
46 The Commission is of the view that the facilities generally leverage considerable policy gains. 
46 Komisija meni, da instrumenti na splošno omogo‐ čajo precejšnje politične koristi.
The policy environment is an integral part of the project appraisal. 
Politično okolje je sestavni del ocenjevanja projekta.
Each project has its own specific objectives and expected impacts, which differ according to the nature of the project. 
Vsak projekt ima svoje posebne cilje in pričakovane učinke, ki se glede na vrsto projekta razlikujejo.
A single project is not expected to impact on all objectives (furthermore, it is not advised to do so). 
En sam projekt naj ne bi vplival na vse cilje (poleg tega se to niti ne priporoča).
In the case of ITF, when the project coincides with the delegation’s focal sector, there is indeed scope to commonly influence the sector policy. 
V primeru ITF, v kolikor se projekt uvršča v prednost‐ ni sektor delegacije, dejansko obstaja možnost skupnega vpliva na sektorsko politiko.
This is dif‐ ferent in cases where a project does not fall in the delegation’s focal sector while, nevertheless bear‐ ing a regional reach. 
Drugače je v primerih, ko se projekt ne uvršča v prednostni sek‐ tor delegacije, čeprav ima regionalni doseg.
51 For political and strategic reasons, the Commis‐ sion (even though considering that EU visibility guidelines were respected) will step up visibility arrangements and further involve delegations in the process. 
51 Komisija bo iz političnih in strateških razlogov (čeprav meni, da so bile spoštovane smernice za prepoznavnost EU) pospešila dogovore glede prepoznavnosti in v postopek nadalje vključevala delegacije.
51 (a) There are specific articles in all the contracts (both in the general conditions and in annex provid‐ ing the description of the action) for the projects financed under the regional blending facilities. 
51 (a) V vseh pogodbah so posebni členi (v splošnih pogo‐ jih in prilogi, v katerih so opisani ukrepi) za pro‐ jekte, ki se financirajo iz regionalnih instrumentov kombiniranja.
These articles stipulate that the lead finance institu‐ tion shall ensure appropriate visibility of the grant. 
V teh členih je določeno, da vodilna finančna institucija zagotavlja ustrezno prepoznav‐ nost nepovratnih sredstev.
In addition, in the new Indirect Management Del‐ egation Agreement which will be used as from 2014 for all the projects contracted under the Regional Blending Facilities there is an annex particularly foreseen for a Communication and Visibility Plan which will be established for each individual project. 
Poleg tega je k novemu sporazumu o prenosu posrednega upravljanja, ki se bo uporabljal od leta 2014, za vse projekte, za katere je sklenjena pogodba v okviru regionalnih instrumentov kom‐ biniranja, dodana priloga, posebej predvidena za načrt komuniciranja in prepoznavnosti, ki se pri‐ pravi za vsak posamezen projekt.
Reply of the Commission 44 As for what refers to WBIF, DG Enlargement has ensured via its technical assistance contracts (IPF and IFICO) that all communication and promotional tools (website, reports, guidelines fact sheets, seminars, workshops, etc.) indicate the EU’s role in the mechanism. 
Odgovori Komisije 44 Za vse, kar se nanaša na naložbeni okvir za zahodni Balkan (WBIF), je GD ELARG prek svojih pogodb o tehnični pomoči (IPF in IFICO) zagotovil, da je pri vseh komunikacijskih in promocijskih orodjih (spletna mesta, poročila, seznam smernic, semi‐ narji, delavnice ipd.) navedena vloga EU v meha‐ nizmu.
Furthermore, greater cooperation with the communication units of the IFIs is being developed and increased references to the EU and WBIF are now evident. 
Poleg tega se razvija tesnejše sodelovanje s komunikacijskimi enotami mednarodnih finančnih institucij, pogostejše sklicevanje na EU in WBIF pa je postalo očitno.
Greater visibility and consist‐ ency should be further improved as all WBIF com‐ munications activities will be centralised in the new expanded IFICO contract. 
Prepoznavnost in usklajenost bi bilo treba dodatno povečati, saj bodo vse komuni‐ kacijske dejavnosti WBIF v skladu z novo razširjeno pogodbo IFICO centralizirane.
52 The Commission stresses that the Communication and Visibility Manual for EU external actions is valid and applicable to all projects in the external actions area. 
52 Komisija poudarja, da se priročnik o komunikaciji in prepoznavnosti v okviru zunanjega delovanja Unije uporablja za vse projekte na področju zunanjih ukrepov.
Conclusions and recommendations 53 The Commission is responsible for the set‐up of the facilities, assessed positively in the report. 
Zaključki in priporočila 53 Komisija je zadolžena za vzpostavitev instrumen‐ tov, ki so v poročilu pozitivno ocenjeni.
The Commission has devised this set‐up taking full account of the potential benefits of the facili‐ ties and considers that its management has been adequate. 
Komisija je oblikovala to ureditev, pri čemer je v celoti upoštevala potencialne koristi instrumen‐ tov, in meni, da je bilo njeno upravljanje ustrezno.
The Commission considers that the realisation of the potential benefits should take into account the nature of the grants (e.g. technical assistance) and the results of the implementation of the projects. 
Komisija meni, da bi bilo pri realizaciji potencialnih koristi treba upoštevati vrsto nepovratnih sred‐ stev (npr. tehnično pomoč) in rezultate izvajanja projektov.
54 The Commission considers that the approval pro‐ cess was thorough: all relevant stakeholders are adequately involved and the Commission adapts the consultation process to the specificities of the projects. 
54 Komisija meni, da je bil postopek odobritve temeljit, saj v zadostni meri vključuje vse zadevne delež‐ nike, Komisija pa postopek posvetovanja prilagaja posebnostim projektov.
Sufficient and complete information is available during the decision‐making process. 
Pri odločanju so na voljo zadostne in popolne informacije.
Added value is assured in all cases: Projects are submitted to the competent Operational Board only when all the project components have been clari‐ fied and its added value is apparent. 
V vseh primerih je zagotovljena dodana vrednost, saj so projekti predloženi pristojnemu operativ‐ nemu odboru le, v kolikor so pojasnjeni vsi elementi projekta in je njegova dodana vrednost očitna.
The arrangements for advance disbursements are being reviewed in the new contract templates for financial instruments. 
Dogovori o vnaprejšnjih izplačilih se pregledujejo v okviru novih pogodbenih predlog za finančne instrumente.
55 The Commission considers that justification for the financing was clear in all cases. 
55 Komisija meni, da je bila utemeljitev financiranja v vseh primerih jasna.
These cases are described in paragraph 42 of this report and have been duly contested and justified by the Com‐ mission. 
Ti primeri, ki jih je Komi‐ sija ustrezno izpodbijala in utemeljila, so opisani v odstavku 42 tega poročila.
Please see Commission’s reply to para‐ graph 42, (a) to (g). 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 42 (a) do (g).
In all cases, the priorities of the facilities have been aligned to EU sectoral policies for each of the regions (clearly stated in their respective Strategic Orientations). 
V vseh primerih so bile prednostne naloge instru‐ mentov skladne s sektorsko politiko EU vsake regije (jasno navedeno v njihovih zadevnih strateških usmeritvah).
Nevertheless, the Commission will look into ways for the achievement of a wider impact on sec‐ tor policy as well as for enhancing visibility of EU support. 
Komisija bo kljub temu proučila načine za dosega‐ nje širšega vpliva na sektorsko politiko in tudi za izboljšanje prepoznavnosti podpore EU.
57 The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
57 Komisija sprejema priporočilo.
The new application form clearly indicates the different forms of the added value the grant can provide. 
V novem obrazcu vloge so jasno navedene različne oblike dodane vrednosti, ki jih lahko zagotovijo nepovratna sredstva.
Reply of the Commission 45 57 (a) The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Odgovori Komisije 45 57 (a) Komisija sprejema priporočilo.
Guidelines on revised governance to steer Com‐ mission’s involvement at all stages of the approval process as well as on project follow‐up are under way in the context of the EU Platform. 
Smernice o revidira‐ nem upravljanju za usmerjanje sodelovanja Komisije v vseh fazah postopka odobritve in tudi pri projektu spremljanja so v pripravi v okviru platforme EU.
57 (b) The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
57 (b) Komisija sprejema priporočilo.
This is an ongoing process, with likely completion at the end of 2014. 
To je postopek, ki še poteka in se bo verjetno zaključil konec leta 2014.
57 (c) The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
57 (c) Komisija sprejema priporočilo.