natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
25 Food assistance for refugees in the Northwest of Tanzania and Spontaneous Site Management and Coordination in the DRC. 
25 Pomoč v hrani za begunce na severozahodu Tanzanije ter upravljanje in usklajevanje spontanih taborov v DR Kongo.
Observations 22 Timeliness of submitted reports UN Agencies International Organisations NGOs Total Interim reports Total number of Interim Reports submitted Number of Interim Reports delayed 5 2 3 2 7 2 15 6 Percentage of late Interim Reports 40 % 67 % 29 % 40 % Average delay (days) 32 17 9 19 Final reports Total number of Final Reports submitted Number of Final Reports delayed 8 8 3 2 8 3 19 13 Percentage of late Final Reports 100 % 67 % 38 % 68 % Average delay (days) 34 102 17 41 38 A key feature of the Commission’s intervention in the AGL region, in comparison to most other humanitarian donors, is its field presence (see paragraphs 9 and 10). 
Opažanja 22 Pravočasnost predloženih poročil Agencije ZN Mednarodne organizacije Nevladne organizacije Skupaj Vmesna poročila Skupno število predloženih vmesnih poročil Število vmesnih poročil, ki so zamujala 5 2 3 2 7 2 15 6 Delež poznih vmesnih poročil 40 % 67 % 29 % 40 % Povprečno trajanje zamude (v dnevih) 32 17 9 19 Končna poročila Skupno število predloženih končnih poročil Število končnih poročil, ki so zamujala 8 8 3 2 8 3 19 13 Delež poznih končnih poročil 100 % 67 % 38 % 68 % Povprečno trajanje zamude (v dnevih) 34 102 17 41 38 Ključna značilnost intervencije Komisije na območju afriških Velikih jezer v primerjavi z večino drugih donatorjev humanitarne pomoči je njena prisotnost na terenu (glej odstavka 9 in 10), ki omogoča sodelovanje in izmenjavo informacij s partnerji, Komisiji pa zagotavlja dobro poznavanje projektov.
This on-the-spot presence was much appreciated by the partners met during the audit who valued the support and expertise provided by the Commission staff. 
Partnerji, s katerimi so med revizijo potekali pogovori, so to prisotnost na kraju samem močno ce-nili, zlasti podporo in strokovno znanje, ki so ju zagotavljali uslužbenci Komisije.
39 However, one quarter26 of the field visit reports were not comprehensive as they commented on certain aspects only and other matters such as financial implementation were not reported. 
39 Toda četrtina26 poročil o obiskih na terenu ni bila izčrpna, saj so poročila vsebovala pripombe le o nekaterih vidikih, o drugih zadevah, kot je finančno izvajanje, pa niso poročala.
In a few cases, the potential effect of detected issues on the results or the budget implementation was not analysed (see examples in Box 3) and no potential mitigating measures were proposed. 
V nekaterih primerih ni bil analiziran potencialni učinek odkritih problematičnih zadev na rezultate ali na izvrševanje proračuna (glej primere v okviru 3) in niso bili predlagani nobeni potencialni blažilni ukrepi.
26 For the 20 projects examined, a total of 33 field visits were performed. 
26 Za 20 preučenih projektov je bilo opravljenih skupno 33 obiskov na terenu.
For nine of them, the monitoring report contained limited comments. 
Za devet obiskov je poročilo o spremljanju vsebovalo le malo pripomb.
Observations 23 Examples of lack of analysis of the implications of detected issues in field visit reports In two cases, a project to improve the food security situation of conflict-affected populations in Katanga (n°11) and another to provide free healthcare for vulnerable populations in South Kivu (n°19), the projects’ durations were extended because there were delays in the implementation resulting in an underutilisation of the budget. 
Opažanja 23 Primeri neizvršene analize posledic odkritih problematičnih zadev v poročilih o obiskih na terenu V dveh primerih, in sicer pri projektu za izboljšanje prehranske varnosti prebivalstva, ki so ga prizadeli konflikti, v Katangi (št.
The extensions were granted shortly before the end of the projects. 
Podaljšanji sta bili odobreni malo pred koncem projektov.
The reports of the field visits that took place shortly before the extensions were granted did not analyse the effect on the budget and did not outline the necessity for an extension. 
V poročilih o obiskih na terenu, ki so potekali malo pred odobritvijo podaljšanj, ni bil analiziran učinek na proračun in opisana potreba po podaljšanju.
Furthermore, the last field visit report for the food security project in Katanga, failed to highlight the impact on the project’s targets (number of beneficiaries, indicators of food distribution and consumption reached, etc.) as a result of funding not received from other donors (final budget less than 50 % of the initial budget). 
Poleg tega v zadnjem poročilu o obisku na terenu za projekt prehranske varnosti v Katangi ni bil opisan učinek, ki ga je na cilje projekta (število upravičencev, kazalniki za razdeljevanje in porabo hrane itd.) imel izpad financiranja, ki bi ga morali zagotoviti drugi donatorji (končni proračun manj kot 50 % prvotnega proračuna).
40 The Commission could not explain how the methodology used was applied to select the partners/projects audited in any specific year in the 2011-2015 period. 
40 Komisija ni mogla pojasniti, kako so bili z uporabljeno metodologijo izbrani partnerji/revidirani projekti v posameznih letih v obdobju 2011–2015.
The lack of a clear methodology for programming of audits at both partners’ headquarters and field level may lead to inappropriate audit strategy and coverage and does not facilitate synergies with the monitoring framework in place. 
Pomanjkanje jasne metodologije za programsko načrtovanje revizij na sedežih partnerjev in na terenu lahko povzroči neustreznost revizijske strategije in pokritosti ter ne spodbuja sinergij z vzpostavljenim okvirom za spremljanje.
Follow‐up is insufficient There is no consolidated reporting giving an overview of the HIP’s implementation 41 The Commission only assesses results at project level, but there is no overview for a given country or HIP. 
Nadaljnje spremljanje ni zadostno Ni konsolidiranega poročanja, ki bi dajalo pregled nad izvajanjem humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta 41 Komisija ocenjuje rezultate le na ravni projekta, nima pa pregleda za posamezne države ali humanitarne izvedbene načrte.
Similarly, the main lessons learned, best practices and the Commission’s added-value identified in the course of the implementation are not reported. Box 3 
Podobno se ne poroča o glavnih pridobljenih izkušnjah, najboljših praksah in dodani vrednosti, ki jo je zagotovila Komisija in je bila ugotovljena med izvajanjem. Okvir 3
Observations 24 42 Every year the Commission selects and evaluates a number of thematic and geographical areas of intervention in line with its planned multi-annual coverage. 
Opažanja 24 42 Komisija v skladu s svojim večletnim načrtom pokritja vsako leto izbere in ovrednoti več tematskih področij in geografskih območij intervencij.
The last evaluations dealing with the AGL region were country evaluations and took place in 2009 for Burundi, in 2010 for the DRC and in 2011 for Uganda. 
Zadnja vrednotenja za območje afriških Velikih jezer so bila vrednotenja za posamezne države, ki so potekala leta 2009 za Burundi, leta 2010 za DR Kongo in leta 2011 za Ugando.
The follow‐up of issues identified at project level is not systematic and lacks documentation 43 The individual management document has a specific box for ‘issues for fol-low-up’. 
Nadaljnje spremljanje problematičnih zadev, ugotovljenih na projektni ravni, ni sistematično in dokumentirano 43 Posamezni dokumenti o upravljanju vsebujejo poseben okvir za problematične zadeve za nadaljnje spremljanje.
Some issues raised during the field visits and in partners’ reports were not mentioned in the box even when they obviously necessitated remedial action. 
Nekatere zadeve, ki so bile omenjene med obiski na terenu in v poročilih partnerjev, v okvirčku niso bile navedene, četudi so očitno zahtevale popravljalne ukrepe.
In addition, when issues were raised for follow-up, there was nothing to indicate that these had been raised with the project partner. 
Poleg tega tudi takrat, ko je bilo omenjeno, da je za nekatere zadeve potrebno nadaljnje spremljanje, ni bilo mogoče razbrati, ali se je o njih razpravljalo s projektnim partnerjem.
Finally, there was no indication that the problems in question had been addressed. 
Nikjer tudi ni bilo navedeno, ali so bili ti problemi obravnavani.
44 ‘Issues for follow-up’ were specifically identified for 14 projects under review in our audit but only two partners reported directly on the actions taken. 
44 Problematične zadeve, ki zahtevajo nadaljnje spremljanje, so bile izrecno ugotovljene pri 14 projektih od tistih, ki so bili pregledani v okviru naše revizije, vendar sta samo dva partnerja neposredno poročala o sprejetih ukrepih.
While in some cases there were indications that measures had been taken by the partners, there is no assurance that this is done systematically. 
V nekaterih primerih je sicer kazalo, da so partnerji ukrepali, vendar ni zagotovila, da se to počne sistematično.
Most of the projects examined delivered satisfactory results 45 We examined whether the intended project results were delivered as planned and whether the Commission was responsive to changes in the field. 
Večina preučenih projektov je dosegla zadovoljive rezultate 45 Sodišče je preučilo, ali so bili predvideni rezultati projektov doseženi, kot je bilo načrtovano, in ali se je Komisija odzivala na spremembe na terenu.
Observations 25 Overall outcomes achieved are positive but in some cases, the Commission’s assessment is not clearly justified 46 All the projects we examined were in line with the Commission’s objectives and with the envisaged actions for the region. 
Opažanja 25 Splošni doseženi izidi so pozitivni, toda v nekaterih primerih ocena Komisije ni jasno utemeljena 46 Vsi projekti, ki jih je preučilo Sodišče, so bili skladni s cilji Komisije in s predvidenimi ukrepi za to območje.
Out of the 20 projects examined, 1927 were found to have delivered satisfactory results despite partial achievements of targets (see example of successful project in Box 4). 
Za 19 od 20 preučenih projektov27 je bilo ugotovljeno, da so dosegli zadovoljive rezultate, čeprav so bili cilji le delno doseženi (glej primer uspešnega projekta v okviru 4).
The assessment of project results is based on the comparison between set and achieved targets taking into account the particular difficulties arising in this area of operations. 
Ocena projektnih rezultatov temelji na primerjavi med zastavljenimi in doseženimi cilji, pri čemer so upoštevane posebne težave, ki se pojavljajo na tem področju operacij.
27 One was not satisfactory. 
27 Eden ni bil zadovoljiv.
Example of a successful project: Rapid response to movement of populations (RRMP, n°15): This project is one of the Commission’s main vehicles for emergency response related to movements of populations in the DRC. 
Primer uspešnega projekta: hitro odzivanje na preseljevanje prebivalstva (št. 15) Ta projekt je eden od glavnih instrumentov Komisije za odzivanje na izredne razmere, povezane s preselje-vanjem prebivalstva v DR Kongo.
It is a recurring project and the Commission’s funding over the period 2011-2015 amounted to 31.5 million euros. 
Gre za ponavljajoči se projekt, za katerega je Komisija v obdobju 2011–2015 zagotovila 31,5 milijona EUR.
It provides multi-sectoral assistance, shelter, NFI (pots and pans, clothes, soap, etc.), water, sanitation, and health care in areas where no other humanitarian organisations are present. 
Projekt zagotavlja večsektorsko pomoč, zavetišča, neprehrambene izdelke (posoda, oblačila, milo itd.), vodo, sanitarije in zdravstveno oskrbo na območjih, na katerih ne delujejo nobene druge humanitarne organizacije.
Interventions consist of the distribution of NFI and shelters, provision of water, sanitation and health care to the most vulnerable populations who have fled from armed groups or returnees that are just back in their villages but have nothing left. 
Intervencije vključujejo razdeljevanje neprehrambenih izdelkov in zavetišč ter zagotavljanje vode, sanitarij in zdravstvene oskrbe najbolj ranljivim skupinam prebivalstva, ki so pobegnile pred oboroženimi skupinami, ali povratnikom, ki so se ravnokar vrnili v svoje vasi, vendar nimajo več nobenega imetja.
Interventions are usually limited to 3 months. 
Intervencije so običajno omejene na tri mesece.
From May to December 2014, the project allowed assistance to be provided to approximately 1.3 million beneficiaries, mainly in North and South Kivu, Maniema and Province Orientale. 
Od maja do decembra 2014 je projekt omogočil zagotovitev pomoči približno 1,3 milijona upravičencem, predvsem v Severnem in Južnem Kivuju, Maniemi in Vzhodni provinci.
On average, 35 % of the interventions took place within 30 days of the movement of population alert compared to a target of 40 %. 
Povprečno se je približno 35 % intervencij začelo v 30 dneh po opozorilu o preseljevanju prebivalstva, cilj pa je bil 40 %.
Despite partial achievement of some initial targets, this project was judged successful considering the context in which it is implemented and the number of beneficiaries reached. 
Čeprav so bili nekateri prvotni cilji le delno doseženi, je bil projekt glede na razmere, v katerih se izvaja, in število doseženih upravičencev ocenjen kot uspešen.
Observations 26 Rapid Response to Movements of Population: distribution of NFI in Lulingu, Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Opažanja 26 Hitro odzivanje na preseljevanje skupin prebivalstva: razdeljevanje neprehrambenih Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče.
47 In some of the cases where the Commission’s assessment was positive despite partial achievement of the targets, it did not provide enough explanation to substantiate its position. 
47 Komisija včasih, ko je kljub le delni dosegi ciljev izrekla pozitivno oceno, svojega mnenja ni dovolj dobro pojasnila.
In four cases we found that the assessment of the overall project achievement and of the partner’s performance was inadequate and did not provide a clear conclusion on the project. 
Sodišče je v štirih primerih ugotovilo, da splošni dosežki projekta in smotrnost poslovanja partnerja niso bili ustrezni ter niso omogočali jasnega zaključka o projektu.
Consequently, a clear logical link between the Commission’s overall conclusion on the project and the results achieved could not be established. 
Zato ni bilo mogoče najti jasne logične povezave med splošnim zaključkom Komisije o projektu in doseženimi rezultati.
48 For the projects examined, one was found to have unsatisfactory results (see Box 5). 
48 Za enega od preučenih projektov je bilo ugotovljeno, da njegovi rezultati niso zadovoljivi (glej okvir 5).
Contractually, the Commission can reduce its contribution in the cases of poor, partial or late implementation of a project, without acceptable justifications provided by the partner. 
Komisija lahko po pogodbi v primeru slabe, delne ali pozne izvedbe projekta zmanjša svoj prispevek, če partner ne zagotovi sprejemljivih utemeljitev.
This option was used for one case with unsatisfactory results but is seldom used as it is cumbersome to implement and could result in the loss of budgeted funds. 
Ta možnost je sicer bila uporabljena v enem primeru, v katerem rezultati niso bili zadovoljivi, vendar se jo uporablja le redko, saj jo je težko izvajati in lahko povzroči izgubo sredstev, predvidenih v proračunu.
Thus, in case of unsatisfactory results and/ or partner’s performance, the Commission’s preferred option was to reduce the subsequent year’s contribution28 or to stop the collaboration with the partners29. Shabunda territory, South Kivu, people retrieving their goods 28 This was the case for at least two partners in 2015. 
Zato je Komisija pri nezadovoljivosti rezultatov in/ali smotrnosti poslovanja partnerja raje zmanjšala prispevek v naslednjem letu28 ali nehala sodelovati s partnerji29. izdelkov v kraju Lulingu, teritorij Shabunda, Južni Kivu – ljudje prejemajo svoje blago 28 Leta 2015 za vsaj dva partnerja.
29 For instance, in the selection process for 2015, three requests for funding were rejected by ECHO partly because of implementation problems identified during ECHO’s monitoring of previously funded projects. Picture 3 
29 V procesu izbora za leto 2015 je GD ECHO na primer zavrnil tri zahtevke za financiranje deloma zaradi težav pri izvajanju, ki jih je ugotovil pri svojem spremljanju prej financiranih projektov. Fotografija 3
Observations 27 Spontaneous Site Management and Coordination in the DRC (n°18) This project was initiated in 2013 and funded by the Commission with an amount of 2 million euros. 
Opažanja 27 Upravljanje in usklajevanje spontanih taborov v DR Kongo (št. 18) Ta projekt je bil uveden leta 2013, ko ga je Komisija financirala v višini 2 milijonov EUR.
The funding for this partner reached 3 million euros by the end of 2015. 
Do konca leta 2015 je financiranje tega partnerja doseglo 3 milijone EUR.
The project’s objectives were: (1) to gather and disseminate information on the managed sites; (2) to manage and coordinate the provision of assistance such as water, sanitation, shelter and non-food items; (3) to digitally register the IDPs in the managed sites. 
Cilji projekta so bili: (1) zbiranje in razširjanje informacij o upravljanih spontanih taborih; (2) upravljanje in usklajevanje zagotavljanja pomoči, kot so voda, sanitarije, zavetišče in neprehrambeni izdelki; (3) digitalno evidentiranje notranje razseljenih oseb v upravljanih spontanih taborih.
The target values for (1) and (2) were eventually reached but due to a delay in procuring equipment the supply of non-food items was delayed by 14 months. 
Ciljne vrednosti za točki 1 in 2 so bile sčasoma dosežene, toda dobava neprehrambenih izdelkov se je zaradi zamude pri naročanju opreme začela 14 mesecev prepozno.
For (3) the digital registration was delayed by 10 months and reached only 25 % of the targeted number. 
Pri točki 3 je digitalno evidentiranje zamujalo za deset mesecev in je doseglo le 25 % ciljnega števila.
Only 24 % of the beneficiaries expected to be covered by the whole project were reached. 
Doseženih je bilo samo 24 % upravičencev, ki naj bi jih po pričakovanjih zajel projekt.
ECHO considered that the performance of the partner was not satisfactory: its project management skills were limited, the administrative procedures were cumbersome and its monitoring of the implementing partner was insufficient. 
GD ECHO je menil, da partnerjeva smotrnost poslovanja ni bila zadovoljiva: njegova sposobnost upravljanja projektov je bila skromna, upravni postopki so bili zapleteni, njegovo spremljanje izvajalskega partnerja pa nezadostno.
All this negatively impacted the outcome of the action. 
Vse to je negativno vplivalo na izid ukrepa.
Despite the unsatisfactory implementation, the Commission reduced its contribution by 57 000 euros only. 
Kljub nezadovoljivemu izvajanju je Komisija svoj prispevek znižala za samo 57 000 EUR.
Furthermore, the partner was contracted again the subsequent year but for a lower amount of contribution. 
Poleg tega je bila s partnerjem naslednje leto znova sklenjena pogodba, vendar za nižji znesek prispevka.
The Commission also identified ineligible expenditure but given that the total amount of eligible expenditure was still higher than the Commission’s maximum contribution, this did not impact the amount of the contribution paid. 
Komisija je tudi ugotovila, da so bili nekateri odhodki neupravičeni, toda ker je bil skupni znesek upravičenih odhodkov še vedno višji od največjega mogočega prispevka Komisije, to ni vplivalo na znesek izplačanega prispevka.
49 For the only contract in the selection awarded following a tendering procedure, ECHO Flight (n°16), more than 10 500 people and 250 tons of merchandise in the DRC30 were transported from May 2014 to March 2015 (11 months). 
49 V okviru edine pogodbe v izboru, ki je bila oddana po postopku javnega naročanja, in sicer pogodbe s službo ECHO Flight (št. 16), je bilo v DR Kongo30 od maja 2014 do marca 2015 (11 mesecev) prepeljanih več kot 10 500 ljudi in 250 ton blaga.
Through this contract, the Commission ensured its partners, and their cargo, secure and rapid access to remote locations which would otherwise be virtually impossible to access. 
S to pogodbo je Komisija za svoje partnerje in njihov tovor zagotovila varen in hiter dostop do oddaljenih lokacij, do katerih bi bilo sicer skoraj nemogoče dostopati.
It thus provided humanitarian assistance to vulnerable population and fulfilled one of the main priorities in the HIP. 
Tako je zagotovila humanitarno pomoč ranljivemu prebivalstvu in izpolnila eno od glavnih prednostnih nalog iz humanitarnega izvedbenega načrta.
30 The contract provides with air transport services for cargo and humanitarian actors also in Kenya and other locations when needed (Mali, Chad, etc.). 
30 Pogodba se nanaša na storitve zračnega prevoza za tovor in humanitarne akterje, po potrebi tudi v Keniji in na drugih lokacijah (Mali, Čad itn.).
Observations 28 The Commission was responsive to changes but could better justify time extensions granted 50 About half31 of the projects in the audit sample were implemented over a longer period than initially planned, from 2 to 6 months, or with more budget (see details in Annex VI). 
Opažanja 28 Komisija se je odzivala na spremembe, vendar bi lahko bolje upravičila odobrena podaljšanja trajanja 50 Približno polovica31 projektov v revizijskem vzorcu se je izvajala od dva do šest mesecev dlje, kot je bilo prvotno načrtovano, ali z večjim proračunom (glej podrobnosti v Prilogi VI).
Five out of seven time extensions, without budget increase, were granted in cases of budget under-consumption, related to delays in implementation mainly justified by external factors. 
Pet od sedmih podaljšanj trajanja projektov, pri katerih proračun ni bil povečan, je bilo odobrenih pri premajhni porabi proračuna, ki je bila povezana z zamudami pri izvajanju, v glavnem utemeljenimi z zunanjimi dejavniki.
Most of the increases in budget, five out of seven, were related to additional needs resulting from the deterioration of the situation or the lack of stabilisation. 
Večina povečanj proračuna, in sicer pet od sedmih, je bila povezana z dodatnimi potrebami, ki so nastale, ker so se razmere poslabšale ali ker se niso stabilizirale.
51 In one case, the main reason for the extension was to give the partner additional time to ‘organise the transition from the Commission funding to another mechanism’. 
51 V enem primeru je bil glavni razlog za podaljšanje omogočiti partnerju, da pridobi dodatni čas za organizacijo prehoda s financiranja Komisije na drug mehanizem.
The Commission itself acknowledged in the assessment of the modification request submitted by the partner that it had ‘not prioritised this project for 2014’32. 
Komisija je v oceni zahtevka za spremembo, ki ga je predložil partner, sama priznala, da tega projekta ni uvrstila med prednostne projekte za leto 201432.
52 In two cases, the extensions were granted when the implementation delays were mainly the partners’ responsibility. 
52 V dveh primerih sta bili podaljšanji odobreni, čeprav so bili za zamude pri izvajanju v glavnem odgovorni partnerji.
In those cases, the Commission decided not to recover part of the funding and not to reallocate this to other projects (see paragraph 48). 
V teh primerih se je Komisija odločila, da ne bo izterjala dela sredstev in jih predodelila za druge projekte (glej odstavek 48).
Instead it chose to give the partners an opportunity to implement as much of the project as possible thus ensuring that beneficiaries would receive the aid. 
Namesto tega je dala partnerjem priložnost, da izvedejo tolikšen del projekta, kot je mogoče, in tako zagotovila, da so upravičenci prejeli pomoč.
Nevertheless, the extension of the duration was not primarily driven by the prioritised needs and vulnerabilities. 
Kljub temu prednostne potrebe in ranljivost niso bile glavni vzrok za podaljšanje.