natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See also Commission reply to paragraph 69. 
Glejte tudi odgovor Komisije na odstavek 69.
114 (d) In the context of the State Aid Modernisation which increased Member States' responsibility in granting aid, DG COMP reinforced its sample based monitoring of implementation of State aid measures. 
114 (d) V okviru modernizacije državne pomoči, ki povečuje odgovornost držav članic za dodelitev pomoči je GD COMP okrepil svoj nadzor nad izvajanjem ukrepov za državno pomoč na podlagi vzorcev.
DG COMP's monitoring targets errors and irregularities in the implementation of aid measures but serves also to learn how Member States actually implement aid measures in practice which enables DG COMP to draw good and bad practices. 
Nadzor GD COMP se osredotoča na napake in nepravilnosti pri izvajanju ukrepov pomoči, služi pa tudi zbiranju informacij o tem, kako države članice v praksi dejansko izvajajo ukrepe pomoči. To omogoča GD COMP, da pripravi sezname dobrih in slabih praks.
DG COMP shares with the Member States (through the Member States' working groups, the country coordinators network etc.) the experience and lessons learned from monitoring. 
GD COMP deli pridobljene izkušnje in znanje iz spremljanja z državami članicami (prek delovnih skupin držav članic, omrežja povezovalcev držav itd.).
DG COMP further developed and shared with the Member States the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER – Commission Regulation No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014) checklists to make it easier for them to check in advance that all applicable compatibility conditions are met. 
GD COMP je nadalje razvil in podelil z državami članicami kontrolne sezname na podlagi Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah (GBER – Uredba Komisije št. 651/2014 z dne 17. junija 2014), da bi lažje vnaprej preverile, ali so izpolnjeni vsi ustrezni pogoji za skladnost.
The GBER checklists are also shared with DG REGIO and DG EMPL and with Cohesion Policy audit authorities. 
Kontrolne sezname GBER prejmejo tudi GD REGIO, GD EMPL in revizijski organi za kohezijsko politiko.
Moreover, DG COMP offers a dedicated IT‐platform where it replies to Member States' interpretation questions (eState aid WIKI) and also publishes FAQ documents on the basis of those questions and replies. 
Poleg tega GD COMP zagotavlja namensko informacijsko platformo, na kateri odgovarja na vprašanja o razlagi držav članic (eState aid WIKI), na podlagi teh vprašanj in odgovorov pa objavlja tudi dokumente s pogostimi vprašanji.
As regards the assessment of ex‐ante conditionalities on State aid, as stipulated in the CPR, it is to be based on the three criteria defined in the annex XI of the CPR. The compliance with State aid rules during the 2007‐2013 program‐ ming period is not a criterion for fulfilment as such. 
Ocena predhodne pogojenosti državne pomoči v skladu z uredbo o skupnih določbah bo temeljila na podlagi treh meril, opredeljenih v prilogi XI te uredbe. Skladnost s pravili o državni pomoči v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 ni merilo za samo izvedbo.
However, the Commission will continue to monitor issues related to compliance with State aid for all Member States and will take appropriate action as necessary. 
Komisija pa bo še naprej spremljala vprašanja, povezana s skladnostjo s pravili o državni pomoči pri vseh državah članicah in bo po potrebi ustrezno ukrepala.
117 DG COMP considers that it properly uses available corrective measures in case monitoring detects incompliance with State aid rules. 
117 GD COMP meni, da pravilno uporablja razpoložljive korektivne ukrepe, če ob spremljanju odkrije neskladnost s pravili o državni pomoči.
Reply of the Commission 84 The Commission can only use corrective measures consisting in voluntary or imposed recovery if the aid granted is incompatible with the internal market. 
Odgovori Komisije 84 Komisija lahko uporabi le korektivne ukrepe, ki obsegajo prostovoljno ali obvezno vračilo dodeljene pomoči, če je ta nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
For some errors, corrective measures would be difficult to achieve (e.g. the aid was incompatible at the moment when it was granted, but can be found compatible on the basis of later revised rules). 
Pri nekaterih napakah bi bilo korektivne ukrepe težko izvesti (npr. če je bila pomoč nezdružljiva v trenutku dodelitve, vendar je bila združljiva na podlagi pozneje spremenjenih pravil).
In any event recom‐ mendations are given to the Member State and where appropriate re‐monitoring of the scheme is envisaged after a while to verify that recommendations have been implemented. 
V vsakem primeru so podana priporočila za države članice in čez čas ponovno spremljanje programa, da preverimo, ali so bila priporočila izvedena, če je to potrebno.
However, the Commission considers recovery of incompatible aid voluntarily implemented by Member States to be a useful tool to swiftly and effectively remove the unfair advantage from the market and to incentivise Member States not to grant unlawful aid. 
Komisija pa meni, da je možnost prostovoljnega vračila nezdružljive pomoči, ki jo uporabijo države članice, uporabno orodje za hitro in učinkovito odpravljanje nepoštene prednosti na trgu, ki države članice spodbuja, da ne dodeljujejo nezakonite pomoči.
Recommendation 1 The Commission accepts the recommendation and considers that it is already implementing it. 
Priporočilo 1 Komisija sprejema priporočilo in meni, da ga že izvaja.
The Commission, however, can only order recovery of such measure, if it is incompatible with the internal market (i.e. it cannot be found com‐ patible on the basis of any Guidelines or directly on the basis of the Treaty). 
Komisija lahko zahteva povrnitev takšnega ukrepa le, če je nezdružljiv z notranjim trgom (to pomeni, da ne more biti združljiv na podlagi katerih koli smernic ali neposredno na podlagi Pogodbe).
If the DG COMP's monitoring detects an illegal aid measure, it first examines whether such measure can be found compatible with the internal market. 
Če spremljanje, ki ga opravlja GD COMP, razkrije nezakonit ukrep pomoči, pristojni najprej preverijo, ali je tak ukrep lahko združljiv z notranjim trgom.
Only if the error detected results into granting of incompatible aid, corrective measures consisting in recovery of aid can be used. 
Korektivne ukrepe s povrnitvijo pomoči je mogoče uporabiti le, če je odkrita napaka vodila v dodelitev nezdružljive pomoči.
118 The Commission notes that both DG REGIO and DG EMPL have made use of databases to record their audit findings under the 2007‐2013 financial period. 
118 Komisija ugotavlja, da sta GD REGIO in GD EMPL za zbiranje revizijskih ugotovitev iz finančnega obdobja 2007–2013 uporabila zbirke podatkov.
While these databases were not intended to serve as tools for an analysis of sources of errors, this did not prevent the Commission from identifying the recurrent types of errors in this area and to implement concrete and targeted measures to prevent State aid errors. 
Čeprav te zbirke podatkov niso namenjene kot orodja za analizo virov napak, je Komisija kljub temu opredelila vrste ponavljajočih se napak na tem področju in izvedla dejanske in ciljno usmerjene ukrepe za preprečevanje napak pri državni pomoči.
Reply of the Commission 85 119 DGs REGIO and EMPL will be able to provide more detailed overview of the type of irregularities on the basis of its IT audit tool MAPAR, which covers the 2014‐2020 programme period for ERDF/CF and ESF. 
Odgovori Komisije 85 119 GD REGIO in GD EMPL bosta lahko ponudila podrobnejši pregled nad vrstami nepravilnosti s pomočjo svojega informacijskega revizijskega orodja MAPAR, ki zajema programsko obdobje 2014–2020 za ESRR/KS in ESS.
One objective of the MAPAR tool is to register and classify identified errors and irregularities, thus providing a database of detailed audit find‐ ings. 
Orodje MAPAR je med drugim namenjeno registraciji in razvrščanju napak ter nepravilnosti, kar omogoča pripravo podatkovne zbirke podrobnih revizijskih ugotovitev.
Also, in the context of the continuous dialogue with audit authorities, the Commission services will continue to work with Member States to develop a common typology of State aid errors, which will be based on and reflected in MAPAR. 
Službe Komisije bodo s stalnim dialogom z revizijskimi organi še naprej sodelovale z državami članicami pri razvoju skupne tipologije napak državne pomoči, ki bo temeljila na orodju MAPAR in bo v njem tudi razvidna.
In addition, this tailor made reporting on the typologies of errors introduced in MAPAR will enable DG REGIO and DG EMPL to transmit to DG COMP on a yearly basis the relevant data on their State aid audit findings. 
Poleg tega bo prilagojeno poročanje o tipologijah napak, ki je uvedeno v orodju MAPAR, omogočilo GD REGIO in GD EMPL vsakoletni prenos ustreznih podatkov o ugotovitvah iz revizij državne pomoči k GD COMP.
See also Commission replies to paragraphs 57, 59 and 61. 
Glejte tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke 57, 59 in 61.
120 IMS is a tool dedicated to the irregularity (including fraud) reporting by Member States. 
120 Sistem za upravljanje nepravilnosti je orodje, namenjeno poročanju držav članic o nepravilnostih (vključno z golju-fijami).
Recommendation 2 (a) The Commission accepts the recommendation and is already implementing it in its audit tool MAPAR. 
Priporočilo 2 (a) Komisija sprejema priporočilo in meni, da ga že izvaja v svojem revizijskem orodju MAPAR.
For the reporting of State aid irregularities specifically, seven types of findings are defined for the time being in MAPAR. 
Trenutno je v MAPAR opredeljenih sedem vrst nepravilnostih za poročanje o državni pomoči.
The MAPAR audit tool is also designed to allow to the concerned Commission services the follow‐up of all identified irregularities, including financial corrections. 
Revizijsko orodje MAPAR je zasnovano tako, da omogoča službam Komisije nadaljnjo obravnavo vseh ugotovljenih nepravilnosti, vključno s finančnimi popravki.
The Commission also refers to its reply to paragraph 57. 
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoj odgovor na odstavek 57.
Recommendation 2 (b) The Commission accepts the Court's recommendation and will adapt the typology of errors so that the analysis can be made. 
Priporočilo 2 (b) Komisija sprejema priporočilo Sodišča in bo prilagodila tipologijo napak, tako da bo mogoče opraviti analizo.
Reply of the Commission 86 Recommendation 2 (c) The Commission accepts the recommendation and is already implementing it. 
Odgovori Komisije 86 Priporočilo 2 (c) Komisija sprejema priporočilo in ga že izvaja.
Common reply to paragraphs 121 and 122 The Commission stresses that the ex‐ante obligation to notify State aid measures lies with the Member States and the decision on the major project is not a decision on compliance of the major project with State aid rules. 
Skupni odgovor na odstavka 121 in 122 Komisija poudarja, da je obveznost predhodnega obveščanja o ukrepih državne pomoči na državah članicah in da odločitev o velikem projektu ne predstavlja tudi odločitve o skladnosti velikega projekta s pravili o državni pomoči.
DG COMP was consulted in formal inter‐service consultations by DG REGIO on major projects decisions before the end of 2012, although not systematically. 
GD COMP se je v okviru formalnih posvetovanj med službami z GD REGIO o odločitvah za velike projekte posvetoval pred koncem leta 2012, vendar ne sistematično.
The Commission put in place preventive measures and enhanced the cooperation between its services to ensure that in the programming period 2014‐2020, only major projects compliant with the new State‐aid related legislation are presented by the Member State and decided by the Commission. 
Komisija je uvedla preventivne ukrepe in okrepila sodelovanje med svojimi službami, da bi zagotovila, da države članice v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 predložijo, Komisija pa odloča le o velikih projektih, ki so skladni z novo zakonodajo o državni pomoči.
Going further and trying to obtain legal certainty through formal State aid notifications on all major projects would conflict not only with the State Aid Modernisation process but also with the overarching objective of simplification and reduction of administrative burden of all stakeholders, and would entail further risk for timely implementation of ERDF/CF funded major projects. 
Nadaljnja prizadevanja za doseganje pravne varnosti v okviru uradnih obvestil o državni pomoči za vse velike projekte bi bila v nasprotju s procesom modernizacije državne pomoči, pa tudi s splošnim ciljem poenostavitve in zmanjšanja upravnih bremen vseh deležnikov ter bi pomenila dodatno tveganje za pravočasno financiranje velikih projektov iz ESRR/KS.
See also Commission replies to paragraphs 69, 107 and 114 (c). 
Glejte tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke 69, 107 in 114(c).
Recommendation 3 The Commission accepts the recommendation and has already implemented it since Member States can only sub‐ mit to the Commission a major project proposal when all State aid compliance issues have been cleared, including through State aid notification where needed. 
Priporočilo 3 Komisija sprejema priporočilo in ga je že izvedla, saj lahko države članice Komisiji predložijo predlog velikega projekta le, ko so bila vsa vprašanja skladnosti državne pomoči razrešena, po potrebi tudi s postopkom obveščanja o državni pomoči.
The Commission also enhanced the cooperation between its services to ensure that in the 2014‐2020 program‐ ming period only major projects for which Member States have thoroughly assessed compliance with the recently updated State‐aid related legislation are presented by the Member States and decided by the Commission. 
Komisija je tudi okrepila sodelovanje med svojimi službami, da bi zagotovila, da bodo v programskem obdobju 2014–2020 države članice predložile, Komisija pa odločala le o predlogih velikih projektov, za katere so države članice temeljito proučile skladnost z nedavno posodobljeno zakonodajo o državni pomoči.
123 The 2007 ‐ 2013 regulatory framework requires audit authorities to submit in their annual control reports (ACR) the principal results of the audits but not detailed information regarding the nature of errors identified in the frame‐ work of the audits of operations. 
123 Regulativni okvir 2007–2013 od revizijskih organov zahteva, da v svojih letnih poročilih o nadzoru objavijo glavne ugotovitve revizij, ne pa tudi podrobnih informacij o vrsti ugotovljenih napak v okviru revizij dejavnosti.
Therefore information communi‐ cated by audit authorities may understate their capacity to detect State aid. 
Zato lahko podatki, ki jih sporočijo revizijski organi, podcenijo njihovo sposobnost zaznavanja državne pomoči.
Reply of the Commission 87 The Commission services are also continuously and closely working with audit authorities in order to increase their audit capacity on State aid issues through training, guidance and exchange of experience, including on the sharing of specific audit checklists which the Commission did in 2011 and again in 2015. 
Odgovori Komisije 87 Službe Komisije prav tako nenehno in tesno sodelujejo z revizijskimi organi, da bi povečale njihovo revizijske zmogljivosti glede vprašanj državne pomoči prek usposabljanja, usmerjanja in izmenjave izkušenj, vključno z izmenjavo posebnih revizijskih kontrolnih seznamov, ki jih je Komisija pripravila leta 2011 in znova leta 2015.
Finally, the Commission's own verifications have found significant improvements concerning the quality of State aid check lists used by audit authorities, in line with the Court’s assessment (see paragraph 79). 
Nenazadnje so lastna preverjanja Komisije pokazala tudi na nedavne pomembne izboljšave kakovosti kontrolnih seznamov za državno pomoč, ki jih uporabljajo revizijski organ, v skladu z oceno Sodišča (glejte odstavek 79).
124 The Commission services have already shared with Member States audit and coordination bodies the GBER Check‐ lists enabling them to check in advance whether all compatibility conditions are fulfilled or to improve audits in this area. 
124 Službe Komisije so kontrolne sezname, skladne z uredbo o splošnih skupinskih izjemah, že podelile z revizijskimi in usklajevalnimi organi držav članic in jim tako omogočile, da vnaprej preverijo, ali so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za združljivost in da izboljšajo revizije na tem področju.
Typology of problems detected, good and bad practices and lessons learned from monitoring are also shared with Member States in different ways (working groups, country coordination network, multilateral or bilateral audit coordination meetings, etc.). Interpretation of State aid rules is further provided by the system of interpretative questions (eState aid Wiki), by analytical grids etc. The Commission considers that the Deggendorf principle can only be applied at the level of an individual Member State. 
Države članice so prejele tudi tipologijo zaznanih težav, sezname dobrih in slabih praks in izkušnje, pridobljene med spremljanjem, na različne načine (prek delovnih skupin, omrežja povezovalcev države, večstranskih ali dvostranskih sestankih za uskladitev revizij itd.). Razlaga pravil o državni pomoči je zagotovljena tudi v sistemu vprašanj o razlagi (eState aid Wiki) v obliki analitičnih preglednic itd. Komisija meni, da je mogoče načelo Deggendorf uporabiti samo na ravni posamezne države članice.
The Commission intends to clarify this point in the ongoing review of GBER 2014. Should a Member State have doubts or face difficulties with identifying whether a certain undertaking is subject to an outstanding recovery order, it can approach DG COMP in the context of mutual cooperation. 
Komisija namerava pojasniti to točko v trenutni reviziji uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah iz leta 2014. Če je država članica v dvomih ali ima težave pri ugotavljanju, ali za določeno podjetje velja neizvedena odredba o vračilu, se lahko obrne na GD COMP v okviru medsebojnega sodelovanja.
Recommendation 4 (a) The Commission accepts the recommendation and has already implemented it. 
Priporočilo 4 (a) Komisija sprejema priporočilo in ga je že izvedla.
The Commission examines the quality of the work of audit authorities with regards to State aid in different audit procedures: in the Commission’s risk‐based audits on the work performed by audit authorities, which include an examination of the methodology (including check‐lists) used by audit authorities for system audits and audits of operations; during re‐performance work on audits already done by audit authorities, to check the validity of the reported results; or during the review each year of Annual Control Reports submitted to the Commission by audit authorities, to confirm whether the audit authority’s opinion is solidly grounded on the basis of the results of sys‐ tem and operations audits. 
Komisija proučuje kakovost dela revizijskih organov glede državne pomoči v različnih revizijskih postopkih: v revizijah Komisije na podlagi tveganja dela revizijskih organov, ki obsegajo pregled metodologije (vključno s kontrolnimi seznami), ki jo uporabljajo revizijski organi pri sistemskih revizijah in revizijah dejavnosti; med ponovnimi ocenami učinkovitosti revizij, ki so jih revizijski organi že izvedli, da preveri veljavnost ugotovitev v poročilih; v vsakoletnem pregledu letnih poročilih o nadzornih pregledih, ki so jih Komisiji predložili revizijski organi, da preveri, ali je mnenje revizijskega organa dobro utemeljeno z ugotovitvami iz sistemskih revizij in revizij dejavnosti.
Recommendation 4 (b) The Commission does not accept the recommendation as it goes against the Commission's objectives pursued through its guidance given to Member States in 2012 to not systematically re‐examine the projects decided before that date – leaving it to Member States the possibility to notify or not ‐ and to provide stability to Member States and beneficiaries as regards the treatment of such projects. 
Priporočilo 4 (b) Komisija ne sprejema priporočila, saj je v nasprotju s cilji Komisije, ki jih je izvedla s smernicami za države članice leta 2012, da jim ni treba sistematično ponovno proučiti projektov, o katerih je bilo odločeno pred tem časom – države članice imajo možnost, da jih priglasijo ali ne – in državam članicam ter upravičenkam zagotoviti stabilnost pri obravnavi takšnih projektov.
Reply of the Commission 88 Recommendation 4 (c) The Commission accepts the recommendation and is already implementing it. 
Odgovori Komisije 88 Priporočilo 4 (c) Komisija sprejema priporočilo in ga že izvaja.
In the context of the implementation of the State aid action plan, the Commission already works on the basis of its State aid decisions which are used as case studies: for instance, over half of the programmes of the thematic semi‐ nars (RDI and Energy have taken place so far) is based on concrete cases (actual State aid decisions). 
Komisija v okviru izvajanja akcijskega načrta državnih pomoči že deluje na podlagi svojih odločitev o državni pomoči, ki se uporabljajo kot študije primerov: na primer, več kot polovica programov tematskih seminarjev (do zdaj sta bila izvedena RDI in Energija) temelji na konkretnih primerih (dejanskih odločitvah o državni pomoči).
Finally, the recently adopted Commission Notice of the Notion of aid provides guidance on when public spending falls within, and outside, the scope of EU State aid control. 
Končno pa nedavno sprejeto Obvestilo Komisije o pojmu pomoči zagotavlja smernico o tem, kdaj je javna poraba znotraj in zunaj nadzora državne pomoči na ravni EU.
Recommendation 4 (d) The Commission does not accept the recommendation since the de minimis Regulation leaves the choice to Member States whether to set up a central register for monitoring de minimis aid or to work on the basis of other means (e.g. self‐declarations by beneficiaries). 
Priporočilo 4 (d) Komisija ne sprejema priporočila, saj uredba de minimis državam članicam prepušča izbiro, ali bodo vzpostavile osrednji register za spremljanje pomoči de minimis ali delale z drugimi sredstvi (npr. s samoprijavami upravičencev).
While a central register of de minimis aid is preferable, Article 6 of the de minimis Regulation does not oblige the Member State to have such register and allows implementing the cumulation rule with other means (e.g. on the basis of self‐declarations by the beneficiaries). 
Osrednji register za pomoč de minimis je sicer zaželen, vendar člen 6 uredbe de minimis držav članic ne zavezuje, da morajo imeti takšen register in dopušča izvajanje pravila o kumulaciji z drugimi sredstvi (npr. na podlagi samoprijav upravičencev).
Leaving to the Member States the choice is in line with the general principle that Member States can decide on the most appropriate administrative setting for them. 
Možnost izbire držav članic je v skladu s splošnim načelom, da smejo same odločati o upravnem okolju, ki je zanje najprimernejše.
The Commission also noted the negative reaction of several Member States on the idea to have a mandatory de minimis register in the context of the first consultation on the revision of the de minimis Regulation. (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/ consultations/2013_de_minimis/index_en.html). 
Komisija je opozorila tudi na negativen odziv več držav članic na zamisel o obveznem registru de minimis v okviru prvega posvetovanja za revizijo uredbe de minimis. (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/2013_de_minimis/index_en.html).
Recommendation 4 (e) The Commission does not accept the recommendation as it considers that the Deggendorf principle can only be applied at the level of an individual Member State. 
Priporočilo 4 (e) Komisija ne sprejema priporočila, saj meni, da je mogoče načelo Deggendorf uporabiti samo na ravni posamezne države članice.
The Commission intends to clarify this point in the ongoing review of the GBER 2014. 
Komisija namerava pojasniti to točko v trenutni reviziji uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah iz leta 2014.
129 As regards the assessment of ex‐ante conditionalities on State aid, as stipulated in the Common Provisions Regula‐ tion (CPR), it is to be based on the three criteria defined in the annex XI of the CPR. 
129 Ocena predhodne pogojenosti državne pomoči v skladu z uredbo o skupnih določbah (CPR) bo temeljila na podlagi treh meril, opredeljenih v prilogi XI te uredbe.