natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Council asked the Commission for a specific proposal on tobacco by September 2003 which would respond to the new strategy. 
Svet je Komisijo zaprosil, da do septembra 2003 predloži poseben predlog za tobak, ki bi ustrezal novi strategiji.
To support this proposal, the Commission carried out an extended impact assessment of the options for market reform. 
V podporo svojemu predlogu je Komisija pripravila razširjeno presojo učinkov možnih izbir za reformo trga.
The Commission considered the following three options: (a) prolongation of the current CMO; (b) decoupling along CAP reform lines; (c) gradual phasing out of support over a 10-year period. 
Komisija je upoštevala naslednje tri možne izbire: (a) podaljšanje sedanje skupne ureditve trga; (b) ločitev v skladu z načeli reforme skupne kmetijske politike; (c) postopno opuščanje podpore v obdobju 10 let.
It concluded that neither (a) nor (c) would permit the CAPŐs new objectives to be met or solve the inherent problems of the current CMO. 
Sklenila je, da ne izbira (a) ne (c) ne bi omogočila doseganja novih ciljev skupne kmetijske politike ali rešila notranjih problemov sedanje skupne ureditve trga.
It decided that option (b) however, should offer a simpler, more efficient means of support for farm incomes while avoiding the undesirable effects of the current coupled regime such as maintenance of production which had no outlet in the EU and potential complications for negotiations with the World Trade Organisation (WTO). 
Odločila pa se je, da bi izbira (b) lahko ponudila preprostejši, učinkovitejši način podpiranja dohodkov kmetij, pri tem pa bi se izognila neželenim učinkom sedanjega, na proizvedeni količini temelječega režima, kot je npr. ohranjanje proizvodnje, za katero v EU ni trga, ter morebitnim komplikacijam v okviru pogajanj s Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo (STO).
(26) October 2003 when the report was published. 
(26) Oktobra 2003, ko je bilo poročilo objavljeno.
The Court considers that the overall message which 
Sodišče meni, da je splošno sporočilo zunanjega ocenje-
C 41/16 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2005 Inadequate preparation of the 1998 reform proposals 97. 
C 41/16 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 17.2.2005 Neustrezna priprava predlogov za reformo iz leta 1998 97.
The CommissionŐs proposals for the 1998 reforms were based on unreliable data and its analysis of the market was inadequate. 
Predlogi Komisije za reforme iz leta 1998 so temeljili na nezanesljivih podatkih, njena analiza trga pa je bila neustrezna.
The importance of tobacco production on employment was based on out-dated and incompatible data, and the impact of the premium system on the production of better quality and a reduction of the mismatch between supply and demand although limited in terms of possibilities was not proven. 
Pomen proizvodnje tobaka za zaposlovanje je temeljil na zastarelih in nezdružljivih podatkih, vpliv sistema premij na proizvodnjo kakovostnejšega tobaka ter na, čeprav z vidika možnosti omejeno, zmanjšanje neskladja med ponudbo in povpraševanjem pa ni bil dokazan.
The Commission could not produce evidence in support of its assertion that better ÔqualityŐ would increase market prices and make producers less dependant on subsidy. 
Komisija ni mogla z dokazi podpreti svoje trditve, da bo boljša „kakovost“ dvignila tržne cene in da bodo zato proizvajalci manj odvisni od subvencij.
The contention that cultivation of alternative crops was not possible was contradicted by a study in one major producer State. 
Trditvi, da pridelava alternativnih pridelkov ni mogoča, je nasprotovala študija, izvedena v eni izmed velikih držav proizvajalk.
Lastly there had been insufficient inter-service cooperation within the Commission to the extent that the tobacco CMO is insufficiently aligned with the EUŐs development, environmental and taxation policy. 
In naposled, službe znotraj Komisije med seboj niso dovolj sodelovale, posledično pa skupna ureditev trga tobaka ni dovolj usklajena z razvojno, okoljsko in davčno politiko EU.
Because of these failings, largely inappropriate policy measures were adopted for the tobacco market and the continuation of the existing aid system (measures) was not justified (see paragraphs 20 to 37). 
Vsled teh pomanjkljivosti so bili za trg s tobakom sprejeti v veliki meri neustrezni ukrepi, nadaljevanje obstoječega sistema pomoči (ukrepov) pa ni bilo upravičeno (glej odstavke 20–37).
The measures of the CMO were largely inappropriate, from the outset because of the aforementioned failings, these measures proved to be ineffective in most areas. 
Ukrepi skupne ureditve trga so bili zaradi zgoraj omenjenih pomanjkljivosti od vsega začetka v veliki meri neustrezni in so se na večini področij izkazali za neučinkovite.
While climatic conditions do not allow production for all EU needs, the premium system was not successful in increasing the production of the quality EU tobacco currently in demand. 
Klimatske razmere sicer ne omogočajo, da bi z notranjo proizvodnjo krili vse potrebe EU, vendar pa sistem premij ni bil uspešen pri povečevanju proizvodnje kakovostnega tobaka v EU, po katerem je povpraševanje.
Therefore it did not change growersŐ dependence on aid (aid represents about 75 % of their income). 
Iz tega razloga tudi ni spremenil odvisnosti pridelovalcev od pomoči (pomoč predstavlja približno 75 % njihovega dohodka).
In addition and contrary to its objectives, the scheme has been an incentive for the production of low quality tobacco which in certain cases is over-compensated even though it has no outlet in the EU. 
Poleg tega je program, v nasprotju s svojimi cilji, predstavljal spodbudo za proizvodnjo tobaka nizke kakovosti, ki je bil v nekaterih primerih deležen pretiranega nadomestila, čeprav zanj v EU ni trga.
Voluntary departure from the tobacco sector through the buy-back scheme was unsuccessful (about 1 % in 2002 and 2 % in 2003 of the guaranteed quantity) because of lack in incentive. 
Prostovoljno zapuščanje tobačnega sektorja s pomočjo sheme odkupa kvot je bilo zaradi premajhnih spodbud neuspešno (približno 1 % zajamčene količine leta 2002 in 2 % leta 2003).
Competition in the market was not increased through the cultivation contract auction scheme as it was not used. 
Konkurenca na trgu se s pomočjo avkcijskega postopka za pogodbe o pridelavi ni povečala, saj postopek ni bil uporabljen.
Moreover, free competition was put at risk by inappropriate price agreements in the three largest producer Member States. 
Poleg tega so svobodno konkurenco ogrozili neprimerni dogovori o cenah v treh največjih proizvajalkah med državami članicami.
Little progress was made in achieving the objectives of orienting production towards less-harmful tobacco varieties, of encouraging alternative economic activities and protecting the environment. 
Pri doseganju ciljev usmerjanja proizvodnje k manj škodljivim sortam tobaka, spodbujanja alternativnih gospodarskih dejavnosti in varovanja okolja je bil napredek majhen.
The Tobacco Fund was under-utilised in the early years. 
V prvih letih je bil Tobačni sklad premalo uporabljan.
Moreover, its limited expenditure was characterised by weaknesses in project management (see paragraphs 38 to 73). 
Poleg tega so bile za njegove omejene izdatke značilne pomanjkljivosti pri vodenju projektov (glej odstavke 38–73).
The Commission carried out audits to ensure that the aid scheme is correctly applied and interpreted by the Member States. 
Komisija je izvajala revizije, da bi zagotovila, da države članice pravilno uporabljajo in si razlagajo program pomoči.
The Court considers that this work should have been extended to cover the key controls outlined in Annex 7. 
Sodišče je mnenja, da bi morala to delo razširiti tako, da bi vključila ključne kontrole, navedene v Prilogi 7.
No clearance of accounts decision was taken before June 2004 and therefore the Commission did not take corrective action when required. 
Do junija 2004 ni bila sprejeta nobena odločitev o potrditvi obračuna in posledično Komisija ni poskrbela za potrebne popravke.
Monitoring and evaluation 101. 
Spremljanje in ocenjevanje 101.
Monitoring of progress made in the implementation of the CMO was deficient because of insufficient information and the reviews made during the annual budgetary procedure, required to justify continuing with the marketŐs measure, were inadequate (see paragraph 74 to 83). 
Spremljanje napredka pri uveljavljanju skupne ureditve trga je bilo pomanjkljivo, kar je bila posledica nezadostnih informacij ter dejstva, da so bile revizije, opravljene med letnim proračunskim procesom, potrebne za upravičevanje nadaljnjega izvajanja tržnih ukrepov, neustrezne (glej odstavke 74–83).
The reports from the Commission required by the Parliament and Council to assess the effectiveness of the 1998 reforms were delayed. 
Poročila, ki sta jih od Komisije zahtevala Parlament in Svet, da bi ocenila učinkovitost reform iz leta 1998, so kasnila.
The results were communicated in November 2002 and September 2003. 
Rezultati so bili sporočeni novembra 2002 in septembra 2003.
A further reform has now been decided. 
Sedaj je bila sprejeta nadaljnja reforma.
On 22 April 2004 the Council of Agricultural Ministers took a decision to fundamentally reform the support for the tobacco sector. 
22. aprila 2004 se je Svet ministrov za kmetijstvo odločil, da bo temeljito reformiral podporo tobačnemu sektorju.
It provides that, from 2010 onwards, tobacco aid will be completely de-linked from production (see paragraphs 84 to 99). 
Ta reforma predvideva, da bo pomoč za tobak od leta 2010 naprej povsem ločena od proizvodnje (glej odstavke 84–99).
Recommendations 103. 
Priporočila 103.
As the situation of tobacco production has not significantly changed over the years (market imbalance, unviable production holdings, ...), the Commission should pursue its strategy to give public health and sustainable development priority over (in this case) tobacco production of questionable viability. 
Ker se stanje v proizvodnji tobaka z leti ni bistveno spremenilo (neuravnotežen trg, nerentabilna pridelovalna posestva ...), bi morala Komisija nadaljevati s svojo strategijo, ki daje javnemu zdravju in trajnostnemu razvoju prednost (v tem primeru) pred proizvodnjo tobaka, katere rentabilnost je vprašljiva.
The Court considers that its observations show that the Commission missed the opportunity in 1998 to propose a reform of the market in the way it is now envisaged. 
Sodišče meni, da njegova opažanja kažejo, da je Komisija leta 1998 zamudila priložnost, da bi predlagala reformo trga, kakršno načrtuje sedaj.
The Commission should address the failings identified in relation to preparation for the 1998 reform and seek to ensure that any reform proposals are supported by sufficient, relevant and reliable data and that the impact of the proposals on the sector is analysed. 
Komisija bi se morala poglobiti v pomanjkljivosti, opažene pri pripravi reforme iz leta 1998, ter si prizadevati, da se bodo vsi reformni predlogi opirali na zadostne, relevantne in zanesljive podatke, kakor tudi da bo vpliv predlogov na sektor analiziran.
With its approved reform in 2004 however, the Council has chosen to continue partial support of the tobacco sector between 2006 and 2009, though the total package of aid will be distributed differently. 
V okviru reforme, potrjene leta 2004, je Svet sklenil med letoma 2006 in 2009 še naprej deloma podpirati tobačni sektor, vendar pa bo paket pomoči drugače sestavljen.
Notwithstanding the improvements which the reform should bring, the Commission should ensure that it monitors and addresses the fact that EU produced tobacco 
Ne glede na izboljšanja, ki naj bi jih prinesla reforma, bi morala Komisija poskrbeti, da bo spremljala in upoštevala dejstvo, da tobak,
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/17 cannot meet all demands; that the EU production is not viable without aid; that it is one of the most expensive market schemes, that it is not in line with the EUŐs public health and sustainable development policy objectives and, finally, that the market prices are suppressed through uncompetitive practices. 
17.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 41/17 proizveden v EU, ne more zadovoljiti vsega povpraševanja; da proizvodnja v EU brez pomoči ni rentabilna; da gre za eno izmed najdražjih tržnih shem, ki ni skladna s cilji politik EU na področju javnega zdravja in trajnostnega razvoja, ter, naposled, da nekonkurenčne prakse dušijo tržne cene.
It is under these conditions that the Court welcomes the CommissionŐs reform proposals as adopted by the Council. 
V tem okviru Sodišče pozdravlja reformne predloge Komisije, kakršne je sprejel Svet.
The Court however points out that, because the production based aid will phase out over time, the weaknesses identified in this report should be addressed. 
Vendar Sodišče poudarja, da se je pomanjkljivostim, omenjenim v tem poročilu, potrebno posveti-ti, saj bo pomoč na podlagi proizvodnje opuščena postopno.
Also, the co-existence of producers receiving aid coupled to production and others receiving a decoupled lump sum could create the risk that producers will collaborate to maximise and share the aid available under both systems. 
Poleg tega bi utegnil sočasni obstoj proizvajalcev, ki prejemajo pomoč, povezano s proizvodnjo, in proizvajalcev, ki prejemajo pavšalni znesek, ločen od proizvodnje, predstavljati nevarnost sodelovanja med proizvajalci, da bi do skrajnosti povečali in si razdelili pomoč, ki je na voljo v obeh sistemih.
The Court recommends that the Commission pursue the outcome of the investigation into anti-competitive behaviour and, if it is confirmed, take appropriate action. 
Sodišče priporoča, da Komisija sledi izidu preiskave protikonkurenčnega vedenja in, če bo potrjen, sprejme ustrezne ukrepe.
The failures by Member States to operate the required checks and controls should also be followed up and corrective action taken where justified. 
Slediti bi morala tudi morebitnemu neizvajanju predpisanih pregledov in kontrol s strani držav članic in, kadar je to upravičeno, ustrezno ukrepati.
This report was adopted by the European Court of Auditors in Luxembourg on 21 July 2004. 
To poročilo je sprejelo Evropsko računsko sodišče v Luxembourgu 21. julija 2004.
For the Court of Auditors Juan Manuel FABRA VALLS President 
Za računsko sodišče Juan Manuel FABRA VALLÉS Predsednik
I Virginia 1 209 195 966 1 161 Đ 48 80 II Burley 936 141 773 914 Đ 22 83 V Sun-cured 1 172 158 773 931 Đ 241 66 VI Basmas 2 872 939 1 338 2 277 Đ 595 47 VII Katerini 1 332 541 1 136 1 677 345 85 VIII Kaba K. Classic 1 265 357 812 1 169 Đ 96 64 Sales prices: Member StatesŐ returns to the Commission in respect of Regulation (EEC) No 1771/93. 
C 41/18 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 17.2.2005 PRILOGA 1 Tobačna oskrbovalna veriga PRILOGA 2 Proizvodni stroški, dohodek in dobiček/izguba na kilogram na 0,1 ha (stremma) v Grčiji, letina 1998 (1 ECU = 327,086 GRD) Skupina sort I virginia 1 209 195 966 1 161 – 48 80 II burley 936 141 773 914 – 22 V sun cured VI basmas VII katerini VIII kaba k. klasičen 1 265 357 812 1 169 – 96 64 A Stroški GRD/kg B Prodajna cena/kg povprečje C Neto pomoč GRD/kg D Skupaj dohodek GRD/kg (B + C) E Neto dohodek/izguba (D – A) F Neto pomoč kot delež stroškov v % 1 – 172 158 773 931 241 2 1 2 – 872 939 338 277 595 1 1 1 332 541 136 677 345 83 Prodajnecene:PoročiladržavčlanicKomisijivskladuzUredbo(EGS)št.
C 41/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union ANNEX 4 17.2.2005 TOTAL E in % of A 100,0 100,0 87,9 83,4 75,4 96,6 71,6 64,2 43,3 34,7 64,6 is deducted from the calculated Ôunused amountsŐ must be cov-Amounts withheld from tobacco production aid for the financing of the Community Tobacco Fund and payments by type of action Year 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Withheld Appropriation uti-(deduction in year lised for the infor-[t Đ 1]) mation component A B 289 744,00 4 839 200,00 8 390 773,00 9 454 679,00 9 371 382,00 1 393 467,15 7 951 889,00 128 308,78 8 498 972,00 1 108 067,10 19 167 708,00 6 321 097,00 18 867 346,00 6 933 341,00 18 744 984,00 2 519 660,00 (1) 105 576 677,00 18 403 941,03 Appropriation utilised for the research component Reconversion D ÔUnused amountsŐ E(A Đ B Đ C) 289 744,00 4 839 200,00 7 373 126,00 7 884 021,00 7 062 446,85 7 679 723,22 6 089 061,90 12 302 150,00 8 174 169,00 6 500 216,00 68 193 857,97 C 1 1 017 647,00 570 658,00 915 468,00 143 857,00 301 843,00 544 461,00 759 836,00 225 108,00 1 3 9 478 878,00 9 500 000,00 (2) 9 500 000,00 (1) State: 23 May 2004. 
Cilj Komisije je podpreti sledečo razvrstitev po kakovosti v padajočem vrstnem redu: Kakovost 1 Skupina VI Kakovost 2 Skupina VII Kakovost 3 Skupina I Kakovost 4 Skupina IV Kakovost 5 Skupina VIII Kakovost 6 Skupina II Kakovost 7 Skupina III Kakovost 8 Skupina V basmas katerini in podobne sorte virginia, virginia D in njuni hibridi, bright kentucky, moro di cori, salento kaba koulak (klasičen), elassona, myrodata agrinion, zichnomyrodata burley, badischer burley, maryland badischer geudertheimer, pereg, korso, paraguay, dragon vert, philippin, semois, appelterre, nijkerk, misionero, rio grande, forchheimer havanna iIc, resistente 142, goyano, hibridi vrste geudertheimer, beneventano, fermentirani burley, havanna, brasile selvaggio in podobne sorte petit grammont, nos-trano del brenta xanthi-yaka, perustitza, samsun, erzegovina in podobne sorte, myrodata smyrmis, trapezous in phi I, kaba koulak (neklasičen), tsebelia, mavra. C 41/20 SL Uradni list Evropske unije PRILOGA 4 17.2.2005 SKUPAJ E v % od A 100,0 100,0 87,9 83,4 75,4 96,6 71,6 64,2 43,3 34,7 64,6 Zneski, zadržani od pomoči za proizvodnjo tobaka za financiranje Sklada Skupnosti za tobak, in izplačila po vrsti dejavnosti Leto 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Skupaj Zadržano Sredstva, (odbitek na leto uporabljena [t – 1]) v informacijske namene A B 289 744,00 4 839 200,00 8 390 773,00 9 454 679,00 9 371 382,00 1 393 467,15 7 951 889,00 128 308,78 8 498 972,00 1 108 067,10 19 167 708,00 6 321 097,00 18 867 346,00 6 933 341,00 18 744 984,00 2 519 660,00 (1) 105 576 677,00 18 403 941,03 Sredstva, uporabljena v raziskovalne namene C Preusmeritev D „Neporabljeni zneski“ E(A – B – C) 289 744,00 4 839 200,00 7 373 126,00 7 884 021,00 7 062 446,85 7 679 723,22 6 089 061,90 12 302 150,00 8 174 169,00 6 500 216,00 68 193 857,97 1 1 017 647,00 570 658,00 915 468,00 143 857,00 301 843,00 544 461,00 759 836,00 225 108,00 1 3 9 478 878,00 9 500 000,00 (2) 9 500 000,00 (1) Stanje: 23. maj 2004.
(2) OJ L 164, 2.7.2003. 
(2) UL L 164, 2.7.2003.
N.B.: The amounts withheld are not allocated to a ÔFundŐ. 
Opomba: Zadržani zneski niso dodeljeni „Skladu“.
In the preparation of the budget, the amount withheld for the financing of the ÔFundŐ premium appropriations, whereby the final appropriation in the budget is only the net amount. 
Pri pripravi proračuna je zadržani znesek za financiranje „Sklada“ odbit od izračunanih sredstev za premije, s čimer so končna sredstva v proračunu samo neto zneski.
Consequently, future expenditure from the ered by future revenue. i.e. it represents Ôa burden of the pastŐ. 
Zaradi tega morajo biti prihodnji izdatki iz „neporabljenih sredstev“ pokriti s prihodnjimi prihodki, tj., predstavlja „breme preteklosti“.
Sources: Commission DG-AGRI and DG SANCO. 
Viri: GD-AGRI in GD SANCO Komisije.
17.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 41/21 ANNEX 5 Cases of non-compliance with legislative requirements in either one or all of the harvest years 1999 to 2001 Type of failure (1) 1 2 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Germany (central level) At beneficiary level Greece (central level) X At first processor level At beneficiary level Spain At regional level At beneficiary level France (central level) At first processor level Italy (central level) X At beneficiary level X X X XX XXX XXXX XXX X X XXXX X X XX(2)X XX X (2) XXXXXXXX X X X (1) The numbers refer to the type of failure listed in the attached notes. 
17.2.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 41/21 PRILOGA 5 Primeri neskladja z zakonodajnimi predpisi v enem ali vseh pridelovalnih letih 1999–2001 Vrsta neskladja (1) 1 2 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Nemčija (Osrednja raven) X Na ravni upravičenca Grčija (Osrednja raven) X X X Na ravni prvih predelovalcev Na ravni upravičenca Španija Na regionalni ravni X Na ravni upravičenca Francija (Osrednja raven) X Na ravni prvih predelovalcev Italija (Osrednja raven) X X Na ravni upravičenca X X X X X X X X X X X X (2) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X (2) X X X X X (1) Številke se nanašajo na vrsto neskladja, navedeno v priloženih opombah.
(2) These failures were also being committed in respect of the harvest years prior to 1999. 
(2) Ta neskladja so bila storjena tudi glede na pridelovalna leta pred 1999.
Notes to Annex 5 (1): Legal requirements 1. 
Opombe k Prilogi 5 (1) Zakonske zahteve 1.
According to the provisions of Article 44 of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98, Member States shall set up inspection arrangements to ensure effective verification of the compliance with that Regulation and with Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 and shall adopt all the additional measures necessary for the application of those Regulations. 
V skladu z določili člena 44 Uredbe (ES) št. 2848/98 države članice uvedejo nadzorni sistem, da zagotovijo učinkovito preverjanje upoštevanja določb te uredbe in Uredbe (EGS) št. 2075/92, ter sprejmejo vse dodatne ukrepe, potrebne za uporabo navedenih uredb.
According to Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 Member States administrative checks shall include cross-checks: Ń on declared tobacco parcels against the database provided for in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 to prevent aid being wrongly paid twice for the same harvest. 
V skladu s členom 45 Uredbe (ES) št. 2848/98 vključujejo administrativni pregledi navzkrižne kontrole: — prijavljenih parcel s tobakom glede na bazo podatkov, predvideno v členu 2 Uredbe (EGS) št.
Cross-checks for 1999 harvest may be carried out on a sample. 
Za letino 1999 se lahko te navzkrižne kontrole opravijo z naključno izbranimi vzorci.
According to the provisions of Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 on the spot checks of parcels: 3.1. must be carried out unannounced; 3.2. shall cover at least 5 % of the individual producers for each processing undertaking; 3.3. must be made on a sample selected on the basis of a risk analysis taking account of at least the quantities covered by contracts in relation to the areas declared as under tobacco (the production yield) and the results of the checks carried out in previous years. 
V skladu z določili člena 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 2848/98 morajo pregledi parcel na kraju samem: 3.1 biti opravljeni nenapovedano; 3.2 obsegati vsaj 5 % posameznih proizvajalcev za sleherno predelovalno podjetje; 3.3 biti opravljeni na vzorcu, izbranem na podlagi analize tveganja, ki upošteva vsaj količine, vključene v pogodbe, glede na prijavljena območja za proizvodnjo tobaka (donos pridelave), in rezultate pregledov, opravljenih v prejšnjih letih.
In a ruling of 13 July 2000 in Case C-46/97, the Court of Justice states that in order to be considered as effective, the on-the-spot checks of tobacco fields must be carried out at the time when the tobacco is still in the field. 
V sodbi z dne 13. julija 2000 v Zadevi C-46/97 Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti izjavlja, da morajo biti pregledi tobaka na kraju samem, če naj bodo učinkoviti, opravljeni v času, ko je tobak še na polju.
According to Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98, in case deliveries are made to distinct purchasing centres, transport of the raw tobacco from these centres to the processing plant must be authorised in advance. 
V skladu s členom 47 Uredbe (ES) št. 2848/98 morajo biti prevozi surovega tobaka, če je ta dobavljen različnim odkupnim centrom, iz teh centrov v predelovalni obrat vnaprej odobreni.
This advance notice shall allow the competent control body to accurately identify the means of transport used, the route, and the time of departure and arrival together with the quantity of tobacco transported in each separate instance. 
To vnaprejšnje obvestilo bo pristojnemu nadzornemu organu omogočilo, da natančno določi uporabljena prevozna sredstva, pot, čas odhoda in prihoda ter prepeljane količine tobaka za vsak posamezen primer.