natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Example of an agricultural climate-related project Source: Conseil Régional Auvergne Rhône-Alpes. 
Primer kmetijskega projekta, povezanega s podnebnimi cilji Vir: regionalni svet Auvergne Rhône-Alpes.
Observations 50 Very limited increased focus on climate action in the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund 88 Climate change was not mainstreamed into the 2007-2013 European Fisheries Fund and the Directorate-General Maritime Affairs and Fisheries therefore has not calculated its contribution to climate action in that period. 
Opažanja 50 Pri Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo le malo večja osredotočenost na podnebne ukrepe 88 Podnebne spremembe v obdobju 2007–2013 niso bile vključene v Evropski sklad za ribištvo, zato Generalni direktorat za pomorske zadeve in ribištvo v tem obdobju ni izračunal njegovega prispevka k podnebnim ukrepom.
We estimated55 EFF’s contribution to climate action to have been around 1 billion euros in 2007-2013, representing 26 % of the Fund. 
Sodišče je ocenilo55, da je v obdobju 2007–2013 prispevek ESR k podnebnim ukrepom znašal približno 1 milijardo EUR, kar je 26 % sredstev sklada.
For 2014-2020, the aggregated estimates of climate action contributions (see paragraph 43) provided in all EMFF operational programmes by the Member States also stand at around 1 billion euros, representing around 18 % of the EMFF. 
Za obdobje 2014–2020 skupne ocene prispevka k podnebnim ukrepom (glej odstavek 43) iz v vseh operativnih programov ESPR držav članic tudi znašajo približno 1 milijardo EUR, kar je približno 18 % ESPR.
89 One of the main reasons for this stability in absolute terms is the reduced support which the EMFF has assigned to fleet management measures. 
89 Eden od glavnih razlogov za to nespremenljivost v absolutnem smislu je zmanjšana podpora, ki jo je ESPR dodelil ukrepom za upravljanje ladjevja.
There was a decrease in the related support for the replacement or modernisation of engines and for the permanent or temporary cessation of fishing activities, which measures are tracked with 100 %, 100 % and 40 % coefficients respectively. 
Zmanjšala se je podpora za menjavo ali posodobitev motorjev in za stalno ali začasno ukinitev ribolovnih dejavnosti, prva dva ukrepa se spremljata s 100-odstotnim, drugi pa s 40-odstotnim koeficientom.
90 We have compared the current legal framework with the 2007-2013 period to ascertain whether the current maritime and fisheries fund has moved towards a better integration of climate change objectives in the content of its measures. 
90 Sodišče je sedanji pravni okvir primerjalo z obdobjem 2007–2013, da bi ugotovilo, ali sedanji sklad za pomorstvo in ribištvo v vsebino svojih ukrepov bolje vključuje cilje na področju podnebnih sprememb.
This was done for the measures which can be traced back to the 2007-2013 period. 
To je naredilo za ukrepe, ki izvirajo iz obdobja 2007–2013.
Direct and clear references to climate change objectives, both mitigation and adaptation, are still rare and, as a result, the fisheries fund had not widened the scope of its contribution to climate action (see Box 10). 
Neposredno in jasno navajanje ciljev na področju blažitev podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanja nanje je še vedno redkost, zato sklad za ribištvo ni razširil svojega prispevka k podnebnim ukrepom (glej okvir 10).
55 Our estimate was mainly based on the methodology used by Directorate-General Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in the budgetary documents for 2014 to 2016, although we also included permanent and temporary cessation measures under the EFF, applying a coefficient of 100 % and 40 % respectively. 
55 Ocena Sodišča je temeljila predvsem na metodologiji, ki jo je Generalni direktorat za pomorske zadeve in ribištvo uporabljal v proračunskih dokumentih za obdobje od leta 2014 do leta 2016, vključeni pa so bili tudi ukrepi stalne ukinitve v okviru ESR, ponderirani s 100-odstotnim koeficientom, in ukrepi začasne ukinitve, ponderirani s 40-odstotnim koeficientom.
This addition is the only deviation from the methodology used by Directorate-General Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, as it reflects at face value the coefficient for fleet adjustment measures laid down in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1232/2014 of 18 November 2014 amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 215/2014 in order to adapt references therein to Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) No 215/2014 (OJ L 332, 19.11.2014, p. 
Ta dodatek je edino odstopanje od metodologije, ki jo uporablja Generalni direktorat za pomorske zadeve in ribištvo, ker odraža nominalno vrednost koeficienta za ukrepe za prilagajanje ladjevja, določene v Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 1232/2014 z dne 18. novembra 2014 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 215/2014 zaradi prilagoditve sklicev Uredbi (EU) št.
5). Observations 51 Examples of better targeting climate change in the audited European Maritime and Fisheries Fund Compared to the previous period, we have identified a limited number of improvements in the EMFF. 
5). Opažanja 51 Primeri boljše usmerjenosti v podnebne spremembe v revidiranem Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo Sodišče je ugotovilo omejeno število izboljšav v ESPR v primerjavi s predhodnim obdobjem.
Out of the 50 measures supported by the EMFF, three previously existing measures56 were improved to incorporate climate action and two new measures with climate change objectives were created57. 
Od 50 ukrepov, ki jih podpira ESPR, so bili trije ukrepi, ki so obstajali že prej56, izboljšani tako, da so vključevali podnebne ukrepe, oblikovana pa sta bila tudi dva nova ukrepa s cilji na področju podnebnih sprememb57.
In addition, the EMFF now contains a stand-alone measure for energy efficiency and climate change mitigation, although similar operations were eligible for financing previously. 
Poleg tega ESPR zdaj vsebuje samostojen ukrep za energetsko učinkovitost in blažitev podnebnih sprememb, čeprav so bile podobne dejavnosti že prej upravičene do financiranja.
This clearly climate-targeted measure, tracked with a 100 % coefficient, should benefit 3 738 projects across the EU, the vast majority of which would concern engine replacement and modernisation. 
Ta ukrep, ki je jasno usmerjen k podnebnim ciljem in se ponderira s 100-odstotnim koeficientom, bi moral koristiti 3 738 projektom po celotni EU, med katerimi velika večina zadeva zamenjavo in posodobitev motorjev.
56 These measures were on ‘Inland fishing and inland aquatic fauna and flora’, on ‘Productive investments in aquaculture’ and on ‘Processing of fishery and aquaculture products’. 
56 To so bili ukrepi za „ribolov v celinskih vodah ter živalske in rastlinske vrste celinskih voda”, „produktivne naložbe v akvakulturo” in „predelavo ribiških proizvodov in proizvodov iz akvakulture”.
References were mainly made to improving energy efficiency. 
Navedeno je bilo predvsem izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti.
57 These two new measures related to ‘Mutual funds for adverse climatic events and environmental incidents’ and ‘Aquaculture stock insurance’. 
57 Ta dva nova ukrepa sta se nanašala na „vzajemne sklade za slabe vremenske razmere in okoljske nesreče” ter „zavarovanje staleža v akvakulturi”.
Conclusions and 52 recommendations 91 The EU institutions made a political commitment for the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework to mainstream climate action across EU budget spending, and to ensure that at least one euro in every five from the EU budget is spent on climate-related activities. 
Zaključki in priporočila 52 91 Institucije EU so sprejele politično zavezo, da bodo v večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2014–2020 podnebne ukrepe vključile v vsa področja porabe proračuna EU in zagotovile, da se vsaj en evro od petih iz proračuna EU porabi za dejavnosti, povezane s podnebnimi ukrepi.
The main aim of this pledge is to respond to the challenge posed by climate change and the substantial investment needs for climate action. 
Glavni namen te zaveze je odziv na izziv podnebnih sprememb in bistvenih potreb po vlaganju v podnebne ukrepe.
We sought to determine whether the target to spend at least 20 % of the EU budget on climate-related action was likely to be met and whether the approach employed was likely to add value, by leading to more and better-focused funding on climate action. 
Sodišče je želelo ugotoviti, ali je verjetno, da bo cilj porabe najmanj 20 % proračuna EU za ukrepe v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami dosežen ter da bo uporabljeni pristop z boljšo usmerjenostjo več finančnih sredstev v podnebne ukrepe prinesel dodano vrednost.
92 We found that ambitious work was underway and that, overall, progress had been made towards reaching the target. 
92 Sodišče je ugotovilo, da poteka ambiciozno delo in da je bil pri doseganju cilja na splošno dosežen napredek.
However, there is a serious risk of falling short of meeting the 20 % target without more effort to tackle climate change. 
Vseeno pa obstaja resno tveganje, da 20-odstotni cilj brez dodatnega prizadevanja za obravnavo podnebnih sprememb ne bo dosežen.
The implementation of the target has led to more, and better-focused, climate action funding in some of the European Structural and Investment Funds namely the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund. 
Prizadevanja za dosego cilja so privedla do več bolje usmerjenega financiranja podnebnih ukrepov iz nekaterih evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov, in sicer Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijskega sklada.
In other areas, however, such as in the European Social Fund, agriculture, and rural development and fisheries, it is largely business as usual, i.e. there has been no significant shift of these funds towards climate action. 
Na drugih področjih, kot so Evropski socialni sklad, kmetijstvo, razvoj podeželja in ribištvo, pa stanje večinoma ostaja nespremenjeno oziroma ni bistvene preusmeritve teh sredstev v podnebne ukrepe.
Overall progress has been made, but there is serious risk that the 20 % target will not be met 93 The objective to spend ‘at least 20 %’ of the EU Budget on climate action is part of the EU’s leadership in climate action and represents a clear commitment to tackling climate change. 
Dosežen je bil splošen napredek, vendar obstaja resno tveganje, da 20-odstotni cilj ne bo dosežen 93 Cilj, da se vsaj 20 % proračuna EU porabi za podnebne ukrepe, je del vodilne vloge EU na področju podnebnih ukrepov in pomeni jasno zavezo boju proti podnebnim spremembam.
According to Commission figures, the share of funding dedicated to climate action has averaged 17.6 % between 2014 and 2016 (see paragraphs 26 and 40 to 41). 
Po podatkih Komisije je bilo med letoma 2014 in 2016 podnebnim ukrepom v povprečju namenjenih 17,6 % finančnih sredstev (glej odstavke 26 in 40 do 41).
94 To date, no tool has been available to provide a multiannual, consolidated update on the progress across the EU budget in achieving this aim. 
94 Do zdaj ni bilo orodja za zagotovitev posodobljenih večletnih konsolidiranih informacij o napredku pri doseganju tega cilja v celotnem proračunu EU.
The Commission has recently updated climate-relevant spending data for the whole 2014-2020 period in the context of the multiannual financial framework mid-term review. 
Komisija je nedavno posodobila podatke o porabi sredstev za podnebne cilje za celotno obdobje 2014–2020 pri vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira.
Overall, the Commission estimates that 18.9 % would be spent on climate action, thereby falling short of the 20 % objective (see paragraph 44). 
Komisija ocenjuje, da bo skupna poraba za podnebne ukrepe znašala 18,9 %, kar pomeni, da 20-odstotni cilj ne bo dosežen (glej odstavek 44).
Conclusions and recommendations 53 95 Weaknesses of the tracking method used by the Commission and Member States concern reporting and comprehensiveness. 
Zaključki in priporočila 53 95 Slabosti metodologije, ki jo za spremljanje uporabljajo Komisija in države članice, so povezane s poročanjem in celovitostjo.
The tracking method does not reflect the full financial effects of EU spending on climate action through financial instruments and off-balance sheet items, despite their increasing use (paragraphs 37 and 38). 
Metoda spremljanja ne odraža v celoti finančnih učinkov porabe sredstev EU za podnebne ukrepe v okviru finančnih instrumentov in zunajbilančnih postavk, čeprav se ti vedno več uporabljajo (odstavka 37 in 38).
It also does not differentiate between mitigation and adaptation measures, thereby making it difficult to assess the level of financing for these different approaches to addressing climate change (paragraph 36). 
Poleg tega metodologija ne razlikuje med ukrepi blažitve in prilagajanja, zato je težko oceniti raven financiranja teh dveh različnih pristopov k obravnavi podnebnih sprememb (odstavek 36).
Recommendation 1 — Robust multi-annual consolidation exercise The Commission should carry out annually, a robust, multi-annual consolidation exercise to identify whether climate expenditure is on track to achieve the 20 % target. 
Priporočilo 1 – Zanesljiva večletna konsolidacija Komisija naj vsako leto izvede zanesljivo večletno konsolidacijo, da bi ugotovila, ali so odhodki za podnebne ukrepe na dobri poti k doseganju 20-odstotnega cilja.
Target implementation date: December 2017. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: december 2017.
Recommendation 2 — Comprehensive reporting framework (a) The Commission should report, annually, consolidated information on the progress towards the overall 20 % target in its annual management and performance report and also report, with comprehensive information thereon, in each relevant annual activity report. 
Priporočilo 2 – Celovit okvir poročanja (a) Komisija naj letno poroča o konsolidiranih informacijah o napredku pri doseganju splošnega 20-odstotnega cilja v svojem letnem poročilu o upravljanju in smotrnosti poslovanja, celovite informacije o tem pa naj navede tudi v ustreznih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih.
This should include reporting on progress on action plans where they exist. 
To naj vključuje poročanje o napredku akcijskih načrtov, če ti obstajajo.
In addition information on the climate contribution of financial instruments should be reported. (b) Member States should report, in their annual implementation reports to the Commission, on the areas under shared management where there are potential opportunities for climate action, outlining how they plan to increase climate action in these areas. 
Poleg tega je treba poročati tudi o informacijah v zvezi s prispevkom finančnih instrumentov. (b) Države članice naj v svojih letnih poročilih o izvajanju Komisiji poročajo o področjih deljenega upravljanja, na katerih obstajajo morebitne priložnosti za podnebne ukrepe, in pojasnijo, kako nameravajo okrepiti podnebne ukrepe na teh področjih.
Target implementation date: Annually, starting from the 2016 annual reports. (c) The Commission and the Member States should ensure that data collection differentiates between mitigation and adaptation. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: letno, z začetkom z letnimi poročili za leto 2016. (c) Komisija in države članice naj zagotovijo, da se pri zbiranju podatkov razlikuje med blažitvijo in prilagajanjem.
Target implementation date: Development of such a system for the next multiannual financial framework. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: razvoj takšnega sistema za naslednji večletni finančni okvir.
Conclusions and recommendations 54 96 We estimated that the rate of climate funding must be increased to an average of 22 % across the remaining years of the current multiannual financial framework, i.e. for 2017 to 2020 (paragraph 46), to reach the overall target of 20 % by the end of 2020. 
Zaključki in priporočila 54 96 Sodišče je ocenilo, da je treba stopnjo financiranja za podnebne cilje v preostalih letih sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira, tj. od leta 2017 do leta 2020, povečati na povprečno 22 % (odstavek 46), da bi do leta 2020 dosegli skupni cilj 20 %.
The main contributors to the target are agriculture and rural development and the cohesion policy, followed by the Horizon 2020 research programme (paragraph 33). 
K cilju največ prispevajo kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter kohezijska politika, sledi pa raziskovalni program Obzorje 2020 (odstavek 33).
No overall plan outlining which funding instruments could contribute and to what extent was ever devised (paragraph 26). 
Nikoli pa ni bil oblikovan splošen načrt, v katerem bi bilo določeno, kateri instrumenti financiranja lahko prispevajo in koliko (odstavek 26).
This is likely to prove to be a sub-optimal way of determining the climate action contribution to be made by spending programmes which differ in nature. 
To se bo verjetno izkazalo kot neoptimalen način za določanje prispevka k podnebnim ukrepom, ki naj bi ga zagotovili različni programi za porabo sredstev.
Recommendation 3 — Assessment of climate change needs When planning the potential contribution to climate action from individual budget lines or funding instruments, the Commission should ensure that such plans are based on a realistic and robust assessment of the climate change needs and on each area’s potential to contribute to the overall target. 
Priporočilo 3 – Ocena potreb na področju podnebnih sprememb Komisija naj pri načrtovanju mogočega prispevka k podnebnim ukrepom iz posameznih proračunskih postavk ali instrumentov financiranja zagotovi, da ti načrti temeljijo na realni in zanesljivi oceni potreb na področju podnebnih sprememb ter potencialu posameznega področja, da prispeva k skupnemu cilju.
Target implementation date: Development of such as system for the next multiannual financial framework. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: razvoj takšnega sistema za naslednji večletni finančni okvir.
97 The main areas examined in this audit are expected to account for 84.5 % of expected contributions to the climate action target. 
97 Za glavna področja, preučena v tej reviziji, se pričakuje, da bodo zajemala 84,5 % predvidenih prispevkov k cilju v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi.
Some of these areas have climate-related targets, the Horizon 2020 programme, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, the LIFE programme and the European Regional Development Fund, supporting the delivery of their contribution (paragraphs 28 and 29). 
Nekatera od teh področij imajo cilje v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi, ki podpirajo uresničitev njihovega prispevka, in sicer program Obzorje 2020, Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja, program LIFE in Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (odstavka 28 in 29).
However, there are serious risks that could affect the expected contribution in agriculture, rural development and research (paragraphs 49 to 51). 
Kljub temu obstajajo resna tveganja, ki bi lahko vplivala na predvidene prispevke na področju kmetijstva, razvoja podeželja in raziskav (odstavki 49 do 51).
98 The Commission’s approach to planning and measuring progress towards the 20 % target across the EU budget was based on an internationally established methodology. 
98 Pristop Komisije k načrtovanju in merjenju napredka pri doseganju 20-odstotnega cilja v celotnem proračunu EU je temeljil na mednarodno priznani metodologiji.
Conclusions and recommendations 55 99 The assumptions concerning the contribution from agricultural direct payments to the climate action target are insufficiently justified. 
Zaključki in priporočila 55 99 Predpostavke v zvezi s prispevkom neposrednih kmetijskih plačil k doseganju cilja v zvezi s podnebnimi ukrepi niso dovolj utemeljene.
An application of the principle of conservativeness would result in a decrease of 9 billion euros in climate contributions (paragraphs 53 and 54). 
Z uporabo načela konzervativnosti bi se prispevek k podnebnim ciljem zmanjšal za 9 milijard EUR (odstavka 53 in 54).
Application of EU-climate coefficients led to an overestimation of the contribution to climate of rural development. 
Zaradi uporabe podnebnih koeficientov EU je prišlo do previsokih ocen prispevka razvoja podeželja k podnebnim ukrepom.
The approach followed for the EAFRD does not distinguish sufficiently between the climate contributions made by different activities, leading to an overestimation of contributions to climate action. 
Pristop, ki se uporablja za EKSRP, ne razlikuje dovolj med prispevki različnih dejavnosti k podnebnim ciljem, kar vodi v previsoke ocene prispevkov za podnebne ukrepe.
Our estimates suggested that the EAFRD climate amounts should be reduced by 23.9 billion euros (paragraph 58). 
Ocene Sodišča so pokazale, da bi bilo treba zneske EKSRP za podnebne cilje zmanjšati za 23,9 milijarde EUR (odstavek 58).
100 We estimated that these adjustments together would reduce the agricultural and rural development climate funding contribution by up to approximately 33 billion euros, which represents around 15 % of the overall target (paragraphs 51, 54 and 58). 
100 Sodišče je ocenilo, da bi se z vsemi temi prilagoditvami prispevek financiranja kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja k podnebnim ciljem zmanjšal za približno 33 milijard EUR, kar pomeni približno 15 % skupnega cilja (odstavki 51, 54 in 58).
Recommendation 4 — Correct overestimations The Commission and the Member States should apply the principle of conservativeness and correct the overestimations in the EAFRD by reviewing the EU climate coefficients set. 
Priporočilo 4 – Popraviti previsoke ocene Komisija in države članice naj uporabijo načelo konzervativnosti in popraviti previsoke ocene v EKSRP, tako da bi revidirale veljavne podnebne koeficiente EU.
Target implementation date: By December 2017. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: december 2017.
101 The Horizon 2020 research programme has fallen behind its 35 % target and needs to catch up. 
101 Program Obzorje 2020 zaostaja za svojim 35-odstotnim ciljem in mora to nadoknaditi.
While it is encouraging that the Commission has put in place an action plan, the plan does not set out in sufficient detail how the required catch-up is expected to be ensured (paragraphs 60 to 64). 
Spodbudno je, da je Komisija pripravila akcijski načrt, vendar ta ne določa dovolj podrobno, kako naj bi zagotovili, da se ta zaostanek nadoknadi (odstavki 60 do 64).
102 Apart from these risks affecting the delivery of the climate contribution in the main areas, other, less significant, contributing areas would need to double their current efforts to achieve the 20 % target. 
102 Poleg teh tveganj, ki vplivajo na zagotavljanje prispevka k podnebnim ciljem na glavnih področjih, bi bilo treba sedanja prizadevanja podvojiti tudi na manj pomembnih prispevnih področjih, da bi dosegli 20-odstotni cilj.
We could find no evidence, such as an action plan, showing that the Commission is increasing efforts in these areas and how such a doubling would be feasible (paragraph 47). 
Sodišče ni našlo dokazov o tem, da bi Komisija povečevala prizadevanja na teh področjih, niti informacij o tem, kako bi takšno podvojitev prizadevanj lahko izvedli (odstavek 47).
Conclusions and recommendations 56 Recommendation 5 — Draw up action plans Whenever the annual consolidation exercise reveals a risk that the expected contributions from a particular area may not be achieved, the Commission should draw up an action plan for that area, setting out in detail how it expects to ensure the catch-up needed. 
Zaključki in priporočila 56 Priporočilo 5 – Priprava akcijskih načrtov Kadar se ob letni konsolidaciji ugotovi tveganje, da predvideni prispevek na določenem področju ne bo dosežen, naj Komisija pripravi akcijski načrt za to področje, v katerem naj podrobno določi, kako namerava zagotoviti, da se zaostanek nadoknadi.
Target implementation date: By March 2017 for the drawing up of action plans. 
Ciljni rok za uresničitev: marec 2017 za pripravo akcijskih načrtov.
103 The Commission’s approach to assessing levels of climate action funding focuses on identifying planned expenditure. 
103 Komisija se pri svojem pristopu k ocenjevanju ravni financiranja podnebnih ukrepov osredotoča na ugotavljanje načrtovanih odhodkov.
Yet this approach carries an inherent risk, since planned expenditure will not necessarily translate into actual spending. 
Ta pristop pa je sam po sebi tvegan, saj načrtovani odhodki ne ustrezajo vedno dejanski porabi.