natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This further mitigates the risks at closure and provides information on the remaining level of errors in the cumulative certified expenditure (see paragraph 91). 
To nadalje zmanjšuje tveganja ob zaključku in zagotavlja informacije o preostali stopnji napak v kumulativnih potrjenih odhodkih (glej odstavek 91).
The phasing concept was present in the closure guidelines from its first adoption. 
Smernice o zaključevanju so pojem delitve v faze vključevale od prvega sprejetja.
Phasing of projects is motivated by the need to ensure continuity of investments between programming periods, to reduce the artificial investment demand cycle (resulting in high prices) the 7-year programming cycle entails and to ensure fulfilment of the ultimate objective. 
Delitev projektov v faze spodbuja potreba po zagotovitvi nadaljevanja naložb med programskimi obdobji, da se skrajša umetni cikel povpraševanja po naložbah (katerega posledice so visoke cene), ki ga zajema sedemletni programskih cikel, in po zagotovitvi izpolnitve končnega cilja.
The Commission considers that the Closure Guidelines adequately clarify the specific rules for phasing of non-major projects and this will not complicate the closure process. 
Komisija meni, da smernice o zaključevanju ustrezno pojasnjujejo posebna pravila za delitev manjših projektov v faze in da to ne bo zapletlo procesa zaključevanja.
Regarding the financial instruments, the modification decision on the closure guidelines of the Commission does not affect the provisions of Regulation 1083/2006 according to which the contribution from the funds into financial instruments must have been paid at latest at 31 December 2015. 
Kar zadeva finančne instrumente, odločitev Komisije o spremembi smernic za zaključevanje ne vpliva na določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006, v skladu s katerimi je moral biti prispevek iz skladov k finančnim instrumentom poravnan najpozneje 31. decembra 2015.
Therefore, the guidelines have only provided clarifications under existing rules. 
Smernice so zato vsebovale le pojasnila v okviru veljavnih pravil.
See also Commission replies to, paragraph 6.45 and recommendation 3 of the Court’s 2015 annual report. 
Glej tudi odgovora Komisije na odstavek 6.45 in priporočilo 3 letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za leto 2015.
Reply of the Commission 86 Common Commission reply to paragraphs 98 and 99 The recommended deadlines in the Commission’s closure guidelines for cohesion aim to help the different authorities to perform their work in due time. 
Odgovori Komisije 86 Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 98 in 99 Cilj priporočenih rokov iz smernic Komisije za zaključevanje na področju kohezije je pomagati različnim organom, da pravočasno opravijo svoje delo.
It is the Member States’ responsibility to ensure appropriate division of tasks and coordination within the national administration. 
Odgovornost držav članic je, da zagotovijo ustrezno delitev nalog in uskladitev z nacionalno upravo.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 100 and 101 In the ‘Questions and answers’ document on closure for the Member States (question 98) the Commission acknowledges this time lag to be factored in by the managing authority regarding financial instruments in order to allow the certifying authority and audit authority to complete their work on time. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 100 in 101 V dokumentu z vprašanji in odgovori o zaključevanju za države članice (vprašanje 98) Komisija priznava, da ta zamik upošteva organ upravljanja v zvezi s finančnimi instrumenti, da certifikacijskemu in revizijskemu organu omogoči, da pravočasna končata svoje delo.
It was recommended that the certifying authority sends the last interim payment claim (including the expenditure that will be certified at closure) to the audit authority by 30 June 2016 to enable it to perform the necessary audit work. 
Priporočeno je bilo, da certifikacijski organ do 30. junija 2016 pošlje revizijskemu organu zadnji zahtevek za vmesno plačilo (vključno z odhodki, ki bodo potrjeni ob zaključku), da mu omogoči opravljanje potrebnega revizijskega dela.
The Commission has provided specific instructions to the audit authorities in that respect, e.g. in the Homologues Group Meeting held in Riga in September 2015. 
Komisija je v zvezi s tem revizijskim organom zagotovila posebna navodila, na primer na sestanku s „skupino Homologues“ septembra 2015 v Rigi.
105 The Commission already pays special attention to the validation of the changes to previous reported error rates. 
105 Komisija posebno pozornost že namenja potrjevanju sprememb predhodnih sporočenih stopenj napak.
For the more risky operational programmes, specific audit work is being carried out before closure. 
V zvezi z bolj tveganimi operativnimi programi se pred zaključevanjem opravi posebno revizijsko delo.
The Court has examined the Commission’s assessment of the error rates disclosed in the annual control reports provided by national authorities since 2010. 
Računsko sodišče je preučilo oceno Komisije glede stopenj napak, razkritih v letnih poročilih o kontrolah, ki so jih nacionalni organi predložili od leta 2010.
107 In line with Article 78(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, the funds’ contribution into financial instruments is included in the payment claims to the Commission. 
107 V skladu s členom 78(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 je prispevek iz skladov za finančne instrumente vključen v zahtevke za plačilo, predložene Komisiji.
Following the Commission guidance, this expenditure should be always included in the audit population. 
Na podlagi smernic Komisije bi morali biti ti odhodki vedno vključeni v populacijo revizije.
In addition as set out in the agreed audit methodology, audit authorities may carry out thematic audits on financial instruments which cover both the constitution of the fund and the actual implementation of projects through the audit of a sample of transactions at the level of the financial intermediaries and/or final recipients. 
Poleg tega lahko revizijski organi, kot je določeno v dogovorjeni revizijski metodologiji, prek revizije vzorca transakcij na ravni finančnih posrednikov in/ali končnih prejemnikov izvedejo tematske revizije finančnih instrumentov, ki zajemajo tako vzpostavitev sklada kot dejansko izvajanje projektov.
The audit authorities, for the purpose of the closure declaration, will have to obtain and provide assurance on the legality and regularity not only of the OP contribution paid into funds implementing financial instruments but also of the use of the OP contribution through underlying transactions implemented by the final recipients. 
Revizijski organi bodo morali za namen izjave o zaključku pridobiti in predložiti zagotovilo o zakonitosti in pravilnosti ne le prispevka OP, plačanega v sklade za izvajanje finančnih instrumentov, ampak tudi uporabe prispevka OP prek temeljnih transakcij, ki jih izvedejo končni prejemniki.
For EAFRD, the Commission required that the certifying bodies confirm for the last clearance of accounts the eligible expenditure for financial instruments. 
V zvezi z EKSRP je Komisija zahtevala, da certifikacijski organi za zadnjo potrditev obračunov potrdijo upravičene odhodke za finančne instrumente.
The Commission refers to its reply in paragraph 100. 
Komisija se sklicuje na svoj odgovor v odstavku 100.
Reply of the Commission 87 108 As regards rural development, the paying agencies and certification bodies should verify actual use of the previous tranche before granting following payment. 
Odgovori Komisije 87 108 Kar zadeva razvoj podeželja, bi morale plačilne agencije in certifikacijski organi pred dodelitvijo naslednjega plačila preveriti dejansko uporabo predhodne tranše.
In addition, exhaustive reporting requirements established under Article 46 of R1303/2013 also ensure proper implementation and sound financial management. 
Poleg tega tudi izčrpne zahteve glede poročanja iz člena 46 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 zagotavljajo ustrezno izvajanje in dobro finančno poslovodenje.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 109 and 110 National and international standards require that advances are paid with contract signature. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 109 in 110 Nacionalni in mednarodni standardi določajo, da se predujmi plačajo na podlagi podpisa pogodbe.
The payment of the advance is thus a prerequisite for the start of implementation of works and services. 
Plačilo pre-dujma je torej pogoj za začetek opravljanja del in storitev.
111 Contractual advances are only eligible insofar as they are paid following national rules and usual market practice. 
111 Pogodbeni predujmi so upravičeni le, če se izplačajo v skladu z nacionalnimi pravili in običajno tržno prakso.
Therefore it is unlikely that these represent high percentages, if they do, there is a market-based reason for it. 
Zato ni verjetno, da predstavljajo visoke odstotke; če pa jih, za to obstaja razlog, ki temelji na trgu.
The Commission has established that advance payments are only eligible if the physical value of the corresponding implementation is at least equal to the advances at closure. 
Komisija je določila, da so predujmi upravičeni le, če je fizična vrednost ustreznega izvajanja vsaj enaka predujmom ob zaključku.
This is an element to verify already through the management verifications. 
To je element, ki ga je treba preveriti že pri preverjanju upravljanja.
In this respect, the national authorities need to check that payments are done on the basis of the granting decision and that payments have been converted into real works or services. 
V zvezi s tem morajo nacionalni organi preveriti, ali so plačila izvedena na podlagi odločitve o dodelitvi in ali so bila plačila pretvorjena v dejansko delo ali storitve.
This issue was already clarified during the 2000-2006 programming period. 
To vprašanje je bilo pojasnjeno že v programskem obdobju 2000–2006.
The audit assurance provided by the audit authorities at closure will also cover the issue of the contractual advances and the fact that the managing authorities have verified their eligibility, as reminded to all audit authorities during 2016 annual audit coordination meeting and in the Homologues Group Meeting in September 2016 (see paragraph 113). 
Revizijsko zagotovilo, ki ga ob zaključku predložijo revizijski organi, bo zajelo tudi vprašanje pogodbenih predujmov in dejstvo, da so organi upravljanja preverili njihovo upravičenost, kot so bili vsi revizijski organi opomnjeni leta 2016 na letnem revizijskem usklajevalnem sestanku in septembra 2016 na sestanku „skupine Homologues“ (glej odstavek 113).
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 114 and 115 The Commission recalls that the obligation to notify state aid measures lies with the Member States and that the Commission decision on the major project is not a decision on compliance of the major project with state aid rules. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 114 in 115 Komisija opozarja, da so za priglasitev ukrepov državne pomoči odgovorne države članice in da odločitev Komisije glede velikega projekta ni odločitev o njegovi skladnosti s pravili o državni pomoči.
However, only for a limited number of major projects a state aid notification is necessary (a notification is not required, e.g. where no state aid involved or the project falls within the scope of a Block Exemption Regulation or an approved aid scheme). 
Kljub temu se priglasitev državne pomoči zahteva le za manjše število velikih projektov (priglasitev ni potrebna na primer, kadar državna pomoč ni vključena ali kadar projekt spada na področje uporabe uredbe o skupinskih izjemah ali odobrene sheme pomoči).
Moreover, a distinction needs to be made between the situation before and after the Leipzig-Halle judgment and between the 2007-2013 and the 2014-2020 programming periods. 
Poleg tega je treba razlikovati med razmerami pred sodbo v zadevi Leipzig-Halle in po njej ter med programskima obdobjema 2007–2013 in 2014–2020.
Reply of the Commission 88 The Commission also notes that the DG COMP was consulted in formal inter-service consultations by DG REGIO on major projects decisions already before the end of 2012, although not systematically. 
Odgovori Komisije 88 Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da se je GD REGIO v okviru uradnih posvetovanj med službami pred koncem leta 2012 posvetoval z GD COMP o odločitvah v zvezi z velikimi projekti, čeprav ne sistematično.
Following the Leipzig-Halle judgement, DG REGIO and DG COMP have enhanced their cooperation in relation to the assessment of major project applications. 
Po sodbi Leipzig-Halle sta GD REGIO in GD COMP okrepila svoje sodelovanje na področju ocenjevanja vlog za velike projekte.
The Commission stresses that there is no major project for which the Commission adopted a decision approving ERDF or CF funding in recent years and for which subsequently a negative decision under state aid rules was adopted. 
Komisija poudarja, da ni velikega projekta, za katerega bi Komisija v zadnjih letih sprejela odločitev o odobritvi financiranja iz ESRR ali Kohezijskega sklada, pozneje pa bi bila zanj sprejeta negativna odločitev na podlagi pravil o državni pomoči.
This shows that the cooperation arrangements put in place work well in practice. 
To pomeni, da vzpostavljeni dogovori o sodelovanju v praksi dobro delujejo.
Conclusions and recommendations Recommendation 1 The Commission does not accept this recommendation. 
Zaključki in priporočila Priporočilo 1 Komisija ne sprejema tega priporočila.
The Commission is not in a position at this stage to make any specific commitment in relation to legislative proposals for the post-2020 period. 
Komisija v tej fazi ne more sprejeti nobene posebne zaveze glede zakonodajnih predlogov za obdobje po letu 2020.
The Commission will seek to further harmonise regulatory provisions between the funds, including on terminology, assurance and closure processes, whenever it enables to improve the management of EU funds and it contributes to a simpler and more effective implementation in Member States and regions. 
Komisija si bo prizadevala za nadaljnje usklajevanje regulativnih določb med skladi, vključno v zvezi s terminologijo, zagotovili in procesi zaključevanja, kadar bo to omogočilo izboljšanje upravljanja skladov EU in prispevalo k enostavnejšemu in učinkovitejšemu izvajanju v državah članicah in regijah.
The importance of preserving the synergies achieved between the two pillars (EAGF and EAFRD) was recognised by the legislator (Recital 4 of Regulation 1303/20133). For both pillars of the CAP, the conformity clearance is separate from the annual financial clearance. 
Zakonodajalec je prepoznal pomembnost ohranitve sinergij, doseženih med obema stebroma (EKJS in EKSRP) (uvodna izjava 4 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/20133). Pri obeh stebrih SKP je potrditev skladnosti ločena od letne finančne potrditve obračunov.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 119 and 120 For rural development, the Commission has not come across any complaints as to the expectation gap from the Member States. 
Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 119 in 120 Na področju razvoja podeželja Komisija ni obravnavala pritožb držav članic v zvezi z različnimi pričakovanji.
The closure exercise is a settlement of financial issues. 
Zaključevanje je razrešitev finančnih vprašanj.
It is a separate exercise from conformity clearance. 
Ločeno je od potrditve skladnosti.
In line with the applicable legislation (Article 52, Regulation 1306/2013), conformity clearance procedures cover a period of 24 months prior to launching the enquiry. 
1306/2013) postopki potrditve skladnosti zajemajo 24-mesečno obdobje pred začetkom preiskave.
Member States are acquainted with the set-up of the system. 
Države članice so seznanjene z vzpostavitvijo sistema.
They are clearly informed about the period covered by each enquiry. 
Nedvoumno so obveščene o obdobju, ki ga zajema posamezna preiskava.
Also in the previous programming period, in rural development, there were financial corrections adopted after the closure of the 2000-2006 period. 
Na področju razvoja podeželja so bili v prejšnjem programskem obdobju po zaključku obdobja 2000–2006 sprejeti tudi finančni popravki.
Member States did not question the timing of the financial correction decisions. 
Države članice niso dvomile v čas odločitev glede finančnih popravkov.
3 ‘As regards the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), significant synergies have already been obtained by harmonising and aligning management and control rules for the first pillar (European Agricultural Guarantee Fund — EAGF) and the second pillar (EAFRD) of the CAP. 
3 „Glede skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) so bile s prilagajanjem in usklajevanjem pravil upravljanja in nadzora za prvi (Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad – EKJS) in drugi steber (EKSRP) SKP dosežene znatne sinergije.
Reply of the Commission 89 121 For CAP expenditure, including rural development, the distinction between on the one hand annual financial clearance and closure procedures and, on the other hand, the conformity clearance procedure, has been established by the legislator for the 2007-2013 period and confirmed for the 2014-2020 period. 
Odgovori Komisije 89 121 Na področju odhodkov za SKP, vključno z razvojem podeželja, je zakonodajalec za obdobje 2007–2013 vzpostavil razlikovanje med letno finančno potrditvijo računov in postopkom zaključevanja na eni strani ter postopkom potrditve skladnosti na drugi strani in ga potrdil za obdobje 2014–2020.
The distinction between accounting and legality and regularity issues has proven to be effective and efficient. 
Izkazalo se je, da je razlikovanje med vprašanji računovodstva ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti učinkovito in uspešno.
122 The Commission considers that such specific reporting on the final outcome of closure for the programme period as a whole can take place in the context of the Annual Activity Report of respective directorates-general. 
122 Komisija meni, da se lahko o končnem izložku zaključitve programskega obdobja kot celote poroča v okviru letnega poročila o dejavnostih zadevnih generalnih direktoratov.
123 The Commission refers to its replies in paragraphs 40 and 54. 
123 Komisija se sklicuje na svoja odgovora v odstavkih 40 in 54.
For cohesion policy, the Annual Activity Reports give details on internal processes aimed at ensuring adequate management of risk related to the legality and regularity of underlying transactions, taking into account multiannual character of programmes as well as the nature of the payments concerned. 
Na področju kohezijske politike so v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih navedene podrobnosti o notranjih postopkih, namenjenih zagotovitvi ustreznega obvladovanja tveganj, povezanih z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo temeljnih transakcij, pri čemer se upoštevata večletni značaj programov in vrsta zadevnih plačil.
In this respect, for 2007-2013 the control objective is to ensure that the cumulative residual risk of each programme does not exceed 2 % on a cumulative basis, based on all available audit results. 
V zvezi s tem je cilj kontrole za obdobje 2007–2013 zagotoviti, da kumulativno preostalo tveganje posameznega programa na podlagi vseh razpoložljivih rezultatov revizije ne presega 2 %, gledano kumulativno.
For 2014-2020, the regulation introduces the annual acceptance of accounts and accordingly the annual acceptance by the Commission of blocks of legal and regular expenditure, as well as the acceptance of a final implementation report per programme as a condition for the acceptance of the final balance. 
Uredba za obdobje 2014–2020 uvaja letno sprejetje obračunov, pri čemer Komisija v skladu s tem izvede letno sprejetje skupine zakonitih in pravilnih odhodkov ter sprejetje končnega poročila o izvajanju za posamezen program kot pogoj za sprejetje končnega zneska.
For EAFRD, 2007-2013 and 2014-2020, the legislator has provided for closure based on the annual financial clearance of accounts with a possibility for application of financial corrections through conformity audits after payment of the final balance. 
V zvezi z EKSRP je zakonodajalec za obdobji 2007–2013 in 2014–2020 predvidel zaključek na podlagi letne finančne potrditve obračunov z možnostjo uporabe finančnih popravkov prek revizij potrditve skladnosti po plačilu končnega zneska.
The Annual Activity Reports will continue to give details on the performance of the rural development measures and report on compliance based on the annual financial clearance exercises and the results of conformity audits. 
V letnih poročilih o dejavnostih bodo še naprej navedene podrobnosti o uspešnosti ukrepov na področju razvoja podeželja ter se bo poročalo o skladnosti na podlagi letnih finančnih potrjevanj obračunov in rezultatov revizij potrditve skladnosti.
125 For rural development, the Commission has set up processes aimed to ensure the adequate management of the risks relating to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, taking into account the multiannual character of programmes as well as the nature of the payments concerned with an objective that the remaining risk to the EU budget does not exceed 2 %. 
125 Na področju razvoja podeželja je Komisija vzpostavila postopke, namenjene zagotovitvi ustreznega obvladovanja tveganj, povezanih z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo temeljnih transakcij, pri čemer je upoštevala večletni značaj programov in vrsto zadevnih plačil s ciljem, da preostalo tveganje za proračun EU ne bi presegalo 2 %.
The legality and regularity of expenditure is checked through the conformity clearance procedure that is carried out separately and independently from the closure exercise. 
Zakonitost in pravilnost odhodkov se preverita s postopkom potrditve skladnosti, ki je izveden ločeno in neodvisno od zaključevanja.
As a result of a conformity clearance procedure, the financial corrections are imposed. 
Kot rezultat postopka potrditve skladnosti se uvedejo finančni popravki.
In the current legal framework, conformity clearance decisions can continue to be taken even after the closure of the programme. 
V sedanjem pravnem okviru se lahko odločitve o potrditvi skladnosti še naprej sprejemajo tudi po zaključitvi programa.
Reply of the Commission 90 Common Commission reply to paragraphs 126 and 127 For the 2007-2013 period there is indeed no legal basis allowing the Commission to link directly the payment of the final balance at closure to the actual achievements at programme/priority axis level. 
Odgovori Komisije 90 Skupni odgovor Komisije na odstavka 126 in 127 Za obdobje 2007–2013 dejansko ni pravne podlage, ki bi Komisiji omogočala neposredno povezavo plačila končnega zneska ob zaključku z dejanskimi dosežki na ravni programa/prednostne osi.
The fact that there is no close regulatory link between performance and payments does not mean that evaluation and performance assessment of programmes do not take place. 
Dejstvo, da ni tesne regulativne povezave med uspešnostjo in plačili, ne pomeni, da se programi ne vrednotijo in da se ne ocenjuje njihova uspešnost.
For the 2014-2020 period the performance framework put in place will create a link between payments and achievement of outputs and results at priority axis level. 
Za obdobje 2014–2020 se bo povezava med plačili ter doseženimi izložki in rezultati na ravni prednostne osi zagotovila z vzpostavljenim okvirom uspešnosti.
Recommendation 2 The Commission does not accept this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 2 Komisija ne sprejema tega priporočila.
In cohesion policy the rules in place for the 2014-2020 programming period already provide for the elements requested by the Court under both indents. 
Na področju kohezijske politike zagotavljajo elemente, ki jih zahteva Računsko sodišče v obeh alineah, že pravila, vzpostavljena za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.
The Commission considers that further alignment between different policy areas should not undermine the synergies achieved in the management of the two funds of the CAP-EAGF and EAFRD. 
Komisija meni, da dodatna uskladitev med različnimi področji ne bi smela ogroziti sinergij, doseženih pri upravljanju obeh skladov SKP, tj. EKJS in EKSRP.