natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
No preventive measures or financial corrections for underachievement of results 25. 
V primeru nezadostnega doseganja rezultatov ni preventivnih ukrepov ali finančnih popravkov 25.
During the 2000‐2006 and 2007‐2013 programme periods, there was no legal provision which would have permitted the Commission to initiate suspension procedures and impose financial corrections in the case of underachievement of results at the level of a programme or a priority axis. 
V programskih obdobjih 2000–2006 in 2007–2013 ni bilo nobene zakonske določbe, v skladu s katero bi Komisija lahko uvedla postopek začasne ustavitve plačil in naložila finančne popravke v primeru nezadostnega doseganja rezultatov na ravni programa ali prednostne osi.
There were also limited possibilities to do so at the level of individual projects. 
Tudi na ravni posameznih projektov je bilo za to malo možnosti.
We have criticised this deficiency in the regulations in several reports18. 18 Special Report No 23/2016 “Maritime transport in the EU: in troubled waters — much ineffective and unsustainable investment”, paragraph 80 (http://eca.europa.eu), Special Report No 36/2016 “An assessment of the arrangements for closure of the 2007‐2013 cohesion and 
Kritiko te pomanjkljivosti v uredbah je Sodišče izrazilo že v več svojih poročilih.18 18 Odstavek 80 Posebnega poročila št 23/2016 – Pomorski promet v EU: v nemirnih vodah – veliko neuspešnih in netrajnostnih naložb (http://eca.europa.eu), odstavek 48 Posebnega poročila št.
Recovery of unduly paid amounts by Member States 26. 
Izterjava neupravičenih zneskov, ki so jih izplačale države članice 26.
Under shared management, Member States are responsible for detecting, correcting and preventing errors so that only regular expenditure is reimbursed from the EU budget. 
V okviru deljenega upravljanja so države članice odgovorne za odkrivanje, popravljanje in preprečevanje napak, tako da se iz proračuna EU povrnejo le pravilni odhodki.
Member States are also required to recover unduly paid (from the EU budget) amounts from beneficiaries19. However, this is not possible if: (a) the error was not committed by the beneficiary, but it concerns issues linked to the functioning of the management and control system (e.g. issues related to the selection of operations to be co‐financed); or (b) the amount is irrecoverable from the beneficiary (e.g. the beneficiary went bankrupt). 
Države članice imajo tudi obvezo, da od upravičencev izterjajo (iz proračuna EU) neupravičeno izplačane zneske.19 Vendar to ni mogoče, kadar: (a) napake ni storil upravičenec, temveč se nanaša na težave v zvezi z delovanjem sistema upravljanja in kontrole (npr. težave, povezane z izbiro dejavnosti, ki naj bi se sofinancirale); ali (b) zneska ni mogoče izterjati od upravičenca (npr. zaradi stečaja upravičenca).
In these cases the Member State budget bears the financial burden of the financial corrections unless it can be shared with the EU budget. 
V teh primerih finančni popravki bremenijo proračun države članice, razen kadar jih je mogoče deliti s proračunom EU.
According to the information provided by Member States to the Commission as of the end of 2015, the publicly (EU and national) financed amount irrecoverable from beneficiaries is 57 million euro (corresponding to total (private and public) eligible expenditure amounting to 115 million euro) for all OPs for the entire 2007‐2013 period20. 28. 
Na osnovi podatkov, ki so jih države članice predložile Komisiji ob koncu leta 2015, je znašal znesek javnih finančnih sredstev (EU in nacionalnih), ki ga ni bilo mogoče izterjati od upravičencev, 57 milijonov EUR (skupni (zasebni in javni) upravičeni odhodki so znašali 115 milijonov EUR) za vse operativne programe v celotnem obdobju 2007–2013.20 28.
Moreover, when an unduly paid amount is recovered from a public body acting as beneficiary, the financial correction is de facto still borne by a national, regional or local public budget. rural development programmes”, paragraph 48 (http://eca.europa.eu), Annual Report concerning financial year 2013, paragraph 10.9 (OJ C 398, 12.11.2014). 
Poleg tega, kadar se neupravičeno izplačan znesek izterja od javnega organa v vlogi upravičenca, finančni popravek de facto še vedno bremeni nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni javni proračun.
Financial corrections are a key input to establishing the residual risk for payments from the EU budget in Cohesion 29. 
Finančni popravki so ključni vhodni podatki za določitev preostalega tveganja v zvezi s plačili iz proračuna EU na področju kohezijske politike 29.
Since 2000, specific regulatory requirements have been added to reinforce the responsibility of Member States to detect, correct and prevent errors and the OPs’ management and control systems have been changed accordingly. 
Od leta 2000 so bile sprejete dodatne specifične uredbene zahteve, da bi se okrepila odgovornost držav članic za odkrivanje, popravljanje in preprečevanje napak, poleg tega pa so bili sistemi upravljanja in kontrole v okviru operativnih programov ustrezno spremenjeni.
Annual error rates per programme for a representative sample of operations validated by the Commission 30. 
Letna stopnja napake po programih za reprezentativni vzorec operacij, ki jo potrdi Komisija 30.
For the 2000‐2006 period, dedicated national authorities needed to check 5 % of eligible expenditure before the winding up of OPs, taking into account their own assessment of the risks that irregularities could occur and aiming at a representative coverage of the OPs’ spending21. The Member States also needed to report on amounts awaiting recovery on a yearly basis22. There was however no requirement to calculate annually an overall error rate or to issue any annual audit opinion. 
Posebej temu namenjeni nacionalni organi so morali za obdobje 2000–2006 pregledati 5 % upravičenih odhodkov pred zaključkom operativnih programov in pri tem upoštevati lastno oceno tveganj za pojav nepravilnosti ter zagotoviti reprezentativno pokritost porabe operativnega programa.21 Države članice so morale prav tako letno poročati o zneskih, ki še niso bili izterjani.22 Vendar ni bilo nobene zahteve, da je treba vsako leto izračunati skupno stopnjo napake ali izdati letno revizijsko mnenje.
For the 2007‐2013 period, the regulation introduced Member State audit authorities who should issue an annual control report (ACR) together with an audit opinion on the legality and regularity of underlying transactions23. The ACR contained an error rate based on a representative sample of audits of operations, which was checked, i.e. validated by the Commission. 
Za obdobje 2007–2013 so bili z uredbo uvedeni revizijski organi držav članic, ki morajo pripraviti letno poročilo o nadzoru in revizijsko mnenje o zakonitosti in pravilnosti ustreznih transakcij.23 V letnem poročilu o nadzoru je bila navedena stopnja napake na podlagi reprezentativnega vzorca za revizije operacij, ki jo je preverila, tj. potrdila Komisija.
Calculation of a cumulative residual risk rate by the Commission 32. 
Izračun stopnje kumulativnega preostalega tveganja, ki ga opravi Komisija 32.
The Member States also provide the Commission with more extensive information on financial corrections made during the year, which is used by the Commission to calculate a 21 22 23 Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 438/2001 of 2 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 as regards the management and control systems for assistance granted under the Structural Funds (OJ L 63, 3.3.2001, p. 
Države članice Komisiji predložijo tudi bolj obširne informacije o finančnih popravkih, opravljenih med letom, ki jih Komisija uporabi za izračun stopnje kumulativnega preostalega tveganja.24 Komisija od leta 2012 v svojih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih izračuna in objavi kazalnik, imenovan kumulativno preostalo tveganje. Kumulativno preostalo tveganje je ocena Komisije o preostalem deležu odhodkov, ki niso zakoniti in pravilni, za vsak operativni program (ali skupino operativnih programov) v programskem obdobju.
Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 438/2001. 
Člen 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 438/2001.
Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 22 
Člen 62 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
In calculating the CRR, the Commission takes into account the annual error rates reported by Member State audit authorities as validated by the Commission. 
Komisija pri izračunu kumulativnega preostalega tveganja upošteva letne stopnje napake, ki so jih sporočili revizijski organi držav članic in ki jih je potrdila sama.
See AAR 2015 of DG Regional and Urban Policy, p. 
75 Letnega poročila o dejavnostih za leto 2015 GD za regionalno in mestno politiko in str.
75 and AAR 2015 of DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, p. 
50 Letnega poročila o dejavnostih za leto 2015 GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje.
The previous special report by the European Court of Auditors on the Commission’s measures to protect the EU budget 34. 
Prejšnje posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča o ukrepih Komisije za zaščito proračuna EU 34.
In 2012, in a previous special report, we assessed the Commission’s measures to protect the EU budget for 2000‐2006 programme period. 
Sodišče je leta 2012 v posebnem poročilu ocenilo ukrepe Komisije za zaščito proračuna EU v programskem obdobju 2000–2006.
Our audit showed that the Commission generally took appropriate action when deficiencies were identified, but that the process was lengthy and that it obtained varying degrees of assurance that deficiencies in national management and control systems had been adequately addressed as a result of its corrective actions27. AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH 35. 
Revizija Sodišča je pokazala, da je Komisija po ugotovitvi pomanjkljivosti na splošno ustrezno ukrepala, vendar je bil proces dolgotrajen, in da je pridobila različne stopnje zagotovila, da so njeni popravljalni ukrepi ustrezno odpravili pomanjkljivosti v nacionalnih sistemih upravljanja in kontrole.27 OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP 35.
Through this audit we assessed whether the Commission’s preventive measures and financial corrections in Cohesion are effective in protecting the EU budget from co‐financing irregular expenditure. 
Sodišče je s to revizijo ocenilo, ali preventivni ukrepi in finančni popravki Komisije na področju kohezije uspešno ščitijo proračun EU pred sofinanciranjem nepravilnih odhodkov.
Our audit focussed on the 2007‐2013 programme period; but we also made a comparison of the Commission’s preventive measures and financial corrections during this period with those of the 2000‐2006 programme period. 
Naša revizija se je osredotočala na programsko obdobje 2007–2013, hkrati pa smo preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke Komisije v navedenem obdobju primerjali tudi s tistimi v programskem obdobju 2000–2006.
We also assessed the likely impact of the relevant changes made in the regulations for the 2014‐2020 programme period. 
Prav tako smo ocenili verjeten učinek ustreznih spremembe v uredbah za programsko obdobje 2014–2020.
(b) the Commission made effective use of the preventive measures and financial corrections during the 2007‐2013 period as provided for in the regulations; (c) whether the Commission, made effective use of the lessons it had learnt when devising the arrangements for 2014‐2020 in order to better protect the EU budget in Cohesion. 
Sodišče je preučilo zlasti, ali: (a) so imeli finančni popravki Komisije zadosten neto učinek na programe ESRR in ESS v obdobju 2000–2006; (b) je Komisija v obdobju 2007–2013 uspešno uporabljala preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke, kakor je določeno v uredbah; (c) je Komisija pri oblikovanju ureditev za obdobje 2014–2020 uspešno uporabila pridobljene izkušnje, da bi bolje zaščitila proračun EU na področju kohezije.
Our audit work consisted of: - a review of relevant EU legislation and Commission guidelines (both internal and those addressed to the Member States) for the periods 2000‐2006, 2007‐2013 and 2014‐2020; - a review of the different Commission publications and reports in relation to measures to protect the EU budget (such as annual activity reports, annual accounts and the Communication on the protection of the EU budget) for the 2007‐2013 period; - a comparative analysis of the distribution over several years of preventive measures and financial corrections applied by the Commission in the 2000‐2006 and 2007‐2013 periods and an assessment of the impact of financial corrections on total programme spending after closure in the 2000‐2006 programme period; - a review of all European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgments on Commission financial correction decisions in the 1994‐1999 and 2000‐2006 periods which were challenged before the ECJ; - an assessment of the Commission internal procedures for the 2007‐2013 period and a verification of how these work in practice through desk review. 
3/2012 – Strukturni skladi: ali je Komisija uspešno obravnavala pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene v upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemih držav članic? (http://eca.europa.eu). − pregled ustrezne zakonodaje EU in smernic Komisije (tako notranjih kot tistih, ki so namenjene državam članicam) za obdobja 2000–2006, 2007–2013 in 2014–2020, − pregled različnih publikacij in poročil Komisije v zvezi z ukrepi za zaščito proračuna EU (kot so letna poročila o dejavnostih, zaključni računi in sporočilo o zaščiti proračuna EU) za obdobje 2007–2013, − primerjalno analizo porazdelitve preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov, ki jih je Komisija uporabila v obdobjih 2000–2006 in 2007–2013, v večletnem obdobju ter oceno učinka finančnih popravkov na skupno porabo programov po zaključku programskega obdobju 2000–2006, − pregled vseh sodb Sodišča Evropske unije v zvezi s sklepi Komisije o finančnih popravkih v obdobjih 1994–1999 in 2000–2006, ki so bile izpodbijane pred tem sodiščem, − oceno notranjih postopkov Komisije za obdobje 2007–2013 in preverjanje na podlagi dokumentacijskega pregleda, kako ti delujejo v praksi.
This included an analysis of the different information sources kept by the Commission and a validation and reconstruction of the audit trail for the specific cases examined; - an examination of a sample of 72 individual cases that had been closed by the end of 2016 related to 20 ERDF/CF and ESF operational programmes for the 2007‐2013 period. 
To je vključevalo analizo različnih virov informacij, ki jih ima Komisija, ter potrjevanje in rekonstrukcijo revizijske sledi za vse preučene specifične primere, − preučitev vzorca 72 primerov, ki so bili zaključeni do konca leta 2016 in so se nanašali na 20 operativnih programov ESRR/Kohezijskega sklada in ESS v obdobju 2007–2013.
For these 20 OPs we have examined all preventive measures and financial corrections. 
V zvezi s temi 20 operativnimi programi smo preučili vse preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke.
These programmes cover around 21 % of the total budget and were randomly selected. 
Ti programi zajemajo približno 21 % celotnega proračuna in so bili izbrani naključno.
The 72 cases examined account for up to 29 % of all financial corrections for the period; 25 - a comparison of programme risk per Member State and the level of financial corrections as well as an analysis of the Commission’s validated error rates and preventive measures and financial corrections during the 2007‐2013 period; and - interviews with members of the European Parliament’s Budgetary Control and Regional Development committees and with representatives of Member States of the Council of the European Union’s Structural Actions Working Party. 
72 preučenih primerov predstavlja do 29 % vseh finančnih popravkov za to obdobje, − primerjavo programskih tveganj po državah članicah in stopenj finančnih popravkov ter analizo stopenj napake, ki jih je potrdila Komisije, in preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov v obdobju 2007–2013, ter − pogovore s člani odborov Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor in regionalni razvoj ter predstavniki Delovne skupine za strukturne ukrepe držav članic Sveta Evropske unije.
The audit covers the period until 31 December 2015 unless indicated otherwise. 
Revizija je zajela obdobje do 31. decembra 2015, razen če je navedeno drugače.
The audit field work was carried out from January 2016 to November 2016. Our examination of the preventive measures and financial corrections was based on errors accepted by Member States. Unless indicated otherwise, the figures presented in this report refer to ex‐post financial corrections imposed by the Commission and accepted by Member States. 
Revizijsko delo na terenu je potekalo od januarja do novembra 2016, preučili pa smo preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke na podlagi napak, ki so jih države članice sprejele. Če ni navedeno drugače, se podatki, predstavljeni v tem poročilu, nanašajo na naknadne finančne popravke, ki jih je naložila Komisija, države članice pa so jih sprejele.
OBSERVATIONS Financial corrections already resulted in net corrections for a number of ERDF and ESF programmes as well as CF projects during the 2000‐2006 period Financial corrections for the 2000‐2006 period amounted to 8 616 million euro or 3.8 % of the total budget for ERDF, CF and ESF 40. 
OPAŽANJA Finančni popravki so že privedli do neto finančnih popravkov za več programov ESRR in ESS in projektov Kohezijskega sklada v obdobju 2000–2006 Finančni popravki za obdobje 2000–2006 so znašali 8 616 milijonov EUR ali 3,8 % celotnega proračuna za ERSS, Kohezijski sklad in ESS 40.
In our assessment of the Commission’s effectiveness in protecting the EU budget from irregular spending we first looked at the 2000‐2006 programme period. 
Sodišče je v okviru svoje ocene uspešnosti Komisije pri zaščiti proračuna EU pred nepravilnimi odhodki najprej preučilo programsko obdobje 2000–2006.
For this period we were able to assess the total impact of the financial corrections on Member States since nearly all OPs were closed by the end of 201528. 41. 
Za to obdobje smo lahko ocenili skupni učinek finančnih popravkov na države članice, saj so bili do konca leta 2015 zaključeni skoraj vsi operativni programi.28 41.
We found that that the Commission imposed a total of 8 616 million euro in financial corrections during the 2000‐2006 period. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je Komisija v obdobju 2000–2006 naložila finančne popravke v skupni višini 8 616 milijonov EUR.
This corresponded to 3.8 % of the total budget envelope (Table 1). 
To je predstavljalo 3,8 % skupnih proračunskih sredstev (tabela 1).
According to the Commission at the closure of the 2000‐2006 programme period all OPs had been closed with sufficient financial corrections having been imposed to ensure that no material irregular expenditure had been paid from the EU budget. 
Po mnenju Komisije so bili ob koncu programskega obdobja 2000–2006 vsi operativni programi zaključeni z zadostnimi finančnimi popravki, da je bilo zagotovljeno, da iz proračuna EU niso bili izplačani pomembni nepravilni odhodki.
Table 1 – Main figures for the implementation of the Commission’s measures to protect the EU budget in Cohesion Allocated envelope (million euro) Confirmed/decided financial corrections (million euro) Confirmed/decided financial corrections /allocated envelope (%) Interrupted amount (million euro) Interrupted amount / allocated envelope (%) Total number of OPs Number of suspended OPs Number of suspended OPs / Total number of OPs (%) Total number of projects Number of suspended projects Suspended projects / Total number of projects (%) 129 607 30 215 68 521 269 879 76 617 0 % Source: European Court of Auditors based on information provided by the Commission. 
65 Letnega poročila o dejavnostih GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje. Tabela 1 – Pomembnejši podatki o izvajanju ukrepov Komisije za zaščito proračuna EU na področju kohezije Dodeljena proračunska sredstva (v milijonih EUR) Potrjeni/sprejeti finančni popravki (v milijonih EUR) Potrjeni/sprejeti finančni popravki / dodeljena sredstva (v %) Znesek, katerega plačilo je bilo prekinjeno (v milijonih EUR) Znesek, katerega plačilo je bilo prekinjeno / dodeljena sredstva (v %) Skupno število operativnih programov 129 607 30 215 68 521 269 879 76 617 Število začasno ustavljenih operativnih programov Število začasno ustavljenih operativnih programov /skupno število operativnih programov 45 11 32 32 (v %) Skupno število projektov Število začasno ustavljenih projektov Število začasno ustavljenih projektov / skupno število projektov (v %) 1 119 1 119 2 0% Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Komisija.
ERDF CF ESF TOTAL 228 344 ERDF/CF TOTAL 346 496 5 794 832 1 990 8 616 2 317 1 009 3 326 4.5 % 2.8 % 2.9 % 3.8 % 0.9 % 1.3 % 1.0 % 379 239 618 56 9% 1 119 2 0% 322 118 440 64 15 % 45 11 32 32 12 % 5% 10 % 27 % 2000‐2006 2007‐2013 ESF 1 119 2 23 364 5 082 28 446 9% 7% 8% 28 
ESRR KOHEZIJSKI SKLAD ESS SKUPAJ 228 344 ESRR/KOHEZIJSKI SKLAD SKUPAJ 346 496 5 794 832 1 990 8 616 2 317 1 009 3 326 4,5 % 2,8 % 2,9 % 3,8 % 0,9 % 1,3 % 1,0 % 2000–2006 2007–2013 ESS 440 64 12% 5% 9% 10% 27% 15% 379 239 618 56 322 118 0 % 2 23 364 5 082 28 446 9% 7% 8% 26
The Commission did not, however, publish an indicator for the whole policy area, similar to the CRR for the 2007‐2013 programme period, to assess if the impact of the above corrections brought the residual risk rate for the policy area under the materiality threshold of 2 %. 
Komisija pa za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 ni objavila kazalnika za celotno področje, podobnega kumulativnemu preostalemu tveganju, da bi ocenila, ali je se je zaradi učinka zgoraj navedenih popravkov stopnja preostalega tveganja za to področje znižala pod prag pomembnosti 2 %.
In the context of our compliance audits we examined the closure payment to 12 ERDF or ESF OPs and to 15 CF projects (altogether 101 projects). 
V okviru revizij skladnosti smo pregledali zaključno plačilo za 12 operativnih programov ESRR ali ESS in 15 projektov Kohezijskega sklada (skupaj 101 projekt).
Of the 101 projects, 20 were affected by errors with financial impact, of which at least in 13 projects the Commission applied financial corrections after the closure procedure has been finalised by the Member State. 
V 20 projektih od 101 smo odkrili napake s finančnim učinkom, od teh pa je Komisija vsaj v 13 projektih določila finančne popravke po tem, ko je država članica finalizirala postopek zaključevanja.
This illustrates that the Commission needs to remain vigilant when examining the closure declaration submitted by Member States. 
To kaže, da mora biti Komisija pri preučitvi izjav o zaključitvi programa, ki jih predložijo države članice, še naprej pozorna.
Table 1 summarises our analysis of the Commission’s measures to protect the EU budget in Cohesion policy for the 2000‐2006 and 2007‐2013 programme periods. 
V Tabeli 1 je povzeta naša analiza ukrepov Komisije za zaščito proračuna EU na področju kohezijske politike za programski obdobji 2000–2006 in 2007–2013.
Net financial corrections for the 2000‐2006 period account for an overall amount of 2 423 million euro (or 1.1 % of the total budget) 46. 
Neto finančni popravki za obdobje 2000–2006 so skupaj znašali 2 423 milijonov EUR (ali 1,1 % celotnega proračuna) 46.
Net financial corrections originate from both Commission decisions, which by default are net, and confirmed financial corrections which can become net if the Member States do not introduce new expenditure. 
Neto finančni popravki temeljijo na sklepih Komisije, kjer so v osnovi navedeni neto popravki, in potrjenih finančnih popravkih, ki lahko postanejo neto popravki, če države članice ne predložijo novih odhodkov.
Financial corrections were decided by the Commission in seven Member States for the ERDF (Belgium, Greece, Spain, France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom), six Member States for the CF (Spain, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania, Portugal and Slovakia) and one Member State for the ESF (France). 
Komisija je v okviru ESRR s sklepi naložila finančne popravke sedmim državam članicam (Belgiji, Grčiji, Španiji, Franciji, Nemčiji, Italiji in Združenemu kraljestvu), v okviru Kohezijskega sklada šestim državam članicam (Španiji, Grčiji, Irski, Litvi, Portugalski in Slovaški), v okviru ESS pa eni državi članici (Franciji).