natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Assessment of the Commission’s supervisory role 33 70 In its 2012 and 2013 annual activity reports DG AGRI adjusted the error rates presented by authorities to take account of other sources of information. 
Ocena nadzorne vloge Komisije 33 70 GD AGRI je v svojih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih za leti 2012 in 2013 prilagodil stopnje napake, ki so jih predložili organi, da bi upošteval druge vire informacij.
DG AGRI now takes account of its own conformity audits, as well as the Court’s audits, the yearly reports of the certification bodies and any other available information in assessing the error rate for paying agencies. 
GD AGRI zdaj pri oceni stopnje napake za plačilne agencije upošteva svoje revizije skladnosti ter tudi revizije Sodišča, letna poročila certifikacijskih organov in vse druge razpoložljive informacije.
For 2013, DG AGRI adjusted the error rates reported by Member States for 43 out of 48 paying agencies audited by the Commission and the Court in the last three years. 
Za leto 2013 je GD AGRI prilagodil stopnje napake, ki so jih sporočile države članice, za 43 od 48 plačilnih agencij, ki sta jih v zadnjih treh letih revidirala Komisija in Sodišče.
For instance, for EU direct aid these uplifts more than tripled the residual error rate calculated on the basis of the statistics reported by the Member States (2,33 % versus 0,69 %). 
Za neposredno pomoč EU na primer se je s tem več kot potrojila stopnja preostale napake, izračunana na podlagi statističnih podatkov, ki so jih sporočile države članice (2,33 % v primerjavi z 0,69 %).
For expenditure not covered by the Commission ́s or the Court ́s audits no adjustments were made. 
Za odhodke, ki niso bili vključeni v revizije Komisije ali Sodišča, ni bilo nobenih prilagoditev.
The Member States carry out the key checks and inspections 71 The supervisory and control system covering the largest amount of agricultural subsidies is the IACS. 
Države članice izvajajo ključne preglede in inšpekcije 71 Nadzorni in kontrolni sistem, ki zajema največji del kmetijskih subvencij, je IAKS.
It applies to all EU area or animal related aid schemes of the EAGF and the EAFRD41 amounting to around 47 billion euro in 2013. 
Uporablja se za vse sheme pomoči EKJS in EKSRP41, ki so vezane na površino ali živali. Te sheme so v letu 2013 znašale približno 47 milijard EUR.
72 As part of its annual statement of assurance audits, during the 2007–2013 period the Court examined the operation of IACS in 38 paying agencies in all 28 Member States. 
72 Sodišče je v okviru svojih letnih revizij za pripravo izjave o zanesljivosti v obdobju 2007–2013 preučilo delovanje IAKS v 38 plačilnih agencijah v vseh 28 državah članicah.
The paying agencies examined manage around 80 % of IACS managed expenditure. 
Preučene plačilne agencije upravljajo približno 80 % odhodkov, ki se upravljajo v okviru IAKS.
The Court has also examined supervisory and control systems for EAGF measures not managed under the IACS at a further four paying agencies. 
Sodišče je nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme za ukrepe EKJS, ki se ne upravljajo v okviru IAKS, preučilo še v štirih plačilnih agencijah.
73 The results of the Court’s systems audits, show very significant variation within and between Member States. 
73 Rezultati revizij sistemov, ki jih je opravilo Sodišče, kažejo zelo velike razlike v državah članicah in med njimi.
Only seven of the control systems were assessed as effective. 
Samo sedem kontrolnih sistemov je bilo ocenjenih kot učinkovitih.
A further 22 were found to be partially effective and nine control systems were assessed as ineffective42. 74 The Court’s testing over the years has shown that the IACS makes a significant contribution to reducing the error rates in the expenditure it covers. 
Za nadaljnjih 22 je Sodišče ugotovilo, da so delno učinkoviti, za 9 pa, da so neučinkoviti.42 74 Preizkušanje, ki ga je Sodišče opravilo v več letih, je pokazalo, da IAKS pomembno prispeva k zmanjšanju stopnje napake pri odhodkih, ki jih zajema.
DG AGRI’s 2013 annual activity report confirms this, showing a rate of error for expenditure managed under IACS three times lower than that for market measures (not managed under IACS)43. 
Letno poročilo o dejavnostih GD AGRI za leto 2013 to potrjuje, saj kaže, da je stopnja napake za odhodke, ki se upravljajo v okviru IAKS, trikrat nižja od stopnje napake za tržne ukrepe (ki se ne upravljajo v okviru IAKS).43
Assessment of the Commission’s supervisory role 34 The Commission’s supervision of cohesion spending 75 In contrast to agriculture, the cohesion system does not have an annual clearance procedure. 
Ocena nadzorne vloge Komisije 34 Nadzor Komisije nad porabo na področju kohezije 75 Pri sistemu na področju kohezije ni letnega postopka potrditve obračunov, ki obstaja v kmetijstvu.
An examination and acceptance of accounts procedure will be introduced in the new period. 
Postopek preučitve in potrditve obračunov bo uveden v novem obdobju.
Audit authorities already look at the legality and regularity of the operations. 
Revizijski organi že pregledujejo zakonitost in pravilnost operacij.
This section of the overview covers the Commission’s supervision of the audit authorities. 
Ta del pregleda zajema nadzor Komisije nad revizijskimi organi.
76 For each period, on the basis of Member States’ proposals, the Commission approves operational programmes (OP) and indicative financial plans which include the EU and national contributions. 
76 Komisija na podlagi predlogov držav članic za vsako obdobje odobri operativne programe skupaj z okvirnimi finančnimi načrti, ki vključujejo prispevek EU in nacionalne prispevke.
Member States bear primary responsibility for preventing or detecting and correcting irregular expenditure and report to the Commission. 
Za preprečevanje ali odkrivanje in popravljanje nepravilnih odhodkov so odgovorne predvsem države članice, ki o tem poročajo Komisiji.
77 Responsibility for day-to-day administration lies with designated managing authorities and intermediate bodies. 
77 Za tekoče upravljanje so odgovorni pooblaščeni organi upravljanja in posredniška telesa.
These must ensure that all projects are eligible for EU funding and that the costs declared comply with all conditions specified in the regulations and/or national rules. 
Ti morajo zagotoviti, da so vsi projekti upravičeni do financiranja EU in da prijavljeni stroški izpolnjujejo vse pogoje iz uredb in/ali nacionalnih pravil.
Their verifications include inspections of projects on a sample basis and desk checks before certification of expenditure. 
Njihovo preverjanje vključuje inšpekcijske preglede projektov na osnovi vzorca in dokumentacijske preglede odhodkov pred potrditvijo.
Certifying authorities must ensure that adequate checks have been made and undertake additional verifications prior to declaring expenditure for reimbursement from the Commission. 
Certifikacijski organi morajo zagotoviti, da so bili opravljeni ustrezni pregledi, in opraviti dodatna preverjanja, preden Komisiji predložijo izjave o odhodkih za povračilo.
78 In addition, for each OP (or a group of OPs), audit authorities in the Member States carry out system audits and, on a statistically representative sample basis, ex post audits of operations. 
78 Poleg tega revizijski organi držav članic za vsak operativni program (ali skupino operativnih programov) izvedejo revizije sistema in na statistično reprezentativnem vzorcu še naknadne revizije operacij.
As mentioned in paragraph 50, the audit authorities report to the Commission through annual control reports which include an annual audit opinion on the functioning of the systems and the audit authorities’ error rate estimate. 
Kot je navedeno v odstavku 50, revizijski organi poročajo Komisiji v letnih poročilih o nadzoru, ki vključujejo letno revizijsko mnenje o delovanju sistemov in oceno stopnje napake, ki jo izračunajo revizijski organi.
79 In accordance with the regulations, if the Commission finds, based on its own work or the information reported by audit authorities, that an authority in the Member State has failed to remedy serious shortcomings in the management and control systems and/or to correct irregular expenditure which had been declared and certified, it may interrupt or suspend payments. 
79 Komisija lahko skladno s predpisi prekine ali začasno ustavi plačila, če na podlagi svojega dela ali informacij, ki jih sporočijo revizijski organi, ugotovi, da organ države članice ni odpravil resnih pomanjkljivosti v sistemih upravljanja in kontrolnih sistemih in/ali ni popravil nepravilnih odhodkov, ki so bili prijavljeni in potrjeni.
If the Member State does not remedy any detected system failures or withdraw the irregular expenditure, the Commission may apply ‘financial corrections’ leading to a net reduction in EU funding for the OP. In practice, however, net reductions are rarely applied. 
Če država članica ne odpravi napak, ki so bile odkrite v sistemih, ali če ne umakne nepravilnih odhodkov, lahko Komisija sprejme finančne popravke, s katerimi zmanjša neto financiranje EU za operativni program, vendar se neto zmanjšanja v praksi redko uporabljajo.
An agreement with the Commission allows the authorities in the Member State to use the amounts ‘corrected’ for other expenditure in future claims. 
Sporazum s Komisijo omogoča, da organi v državah članicah popravljene zneske uporabijo za druge odhodke v prihodnjih zahtevkih.
Assessment of the Commission’s supervisory role 35 80 The information provided by audit authorities in their annual control reports, audit opinions and systems audit reports is one of the main sources underlying the Commission’s assessment, for each OP, of the legality and regularity of EU spending. 
Ocena nadzorne vloge Komisije 35 80 Informacije, ki jih revizijski organi prikažejo v svojih letnih poročilih o nadzoru, revizijskih mnenjih in poročilih o revizijah sistemov so eden glavnih virov, na podlagi katerih Komisija oceni zakonitost in pravilnost porabe EU za posamezne operativne programe.
The Commission has progressively improved its approach 81 The Commission presents in the annual activity report an estimate of the extent to which operational programmes are affected by errors of legality and regularity. 
Komisija je postopoma izboljšala svoj pristop 81 Komisija v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih predstavi oceno obsega, v katerem na operativne programe vplivajo napake v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo.
Since 2011, both cohesion DGs adjust the figures reported by authorities in the Member States to take account of identified weaknesses. 
Od leta 2011 oba kohezijska generalna direktorata prilagodita podatke, ki jih sporočijo organi držav članic, zaradi upoštevanja ugotovljenih slabosti.
For the interim and final payments authorised during 2013 under the ESF and the ERDF/CF (2007-2013 operational programmes) DG EMPL and DG REGIO estimate the amount at risk to lie in the range of 2,6 % to 3,5 % and of 2,8 % to 5,3 % respectively. 
GD EMPL in GD REGIO sta za vmesna in končna plačila, odobrena v letu 2013 v okviru ESS in ESRR/KS (operativni programi iz obdobja 2007–2013), ocenila, da je razpon zneska, pri katerem obstaja tveganje, od 2,6 % do 3,5 % oziroma od 2,8 % do 5,3 %.
Both ranges are above the 2 % materiality threshold set by the Commission. 
Oba razpona sta nad 2-odstotnim pragom pomembnosti, ki ga je določila Komisija.
82 The robustness of the Commission’s assessment is affected by the accuracy and reliability of information reported by Member State authorities. 
82 Na zanesljivost ocene Komisije vplivata natančnost in zanesljivost informacij, ki jih sporočijo organi držav članic.
Special report 16/2013 ‘Taking stock of “single audit” and the Commission’s reliance on the work of national audit authorities in cohesion’ observed that44: ο some audit authorities underreported problems; ο the reported error rates were not always fully reliable; ο information on ‘financial corrections’ reported by Member States might not always be reliable or accurate, and ο the Commission’s calculation method resulted in an underestimated residual error rate. 
16/2013 – Ocena enotne revizije in zanašanja Komisije na delo nacionalnih revizijskih organov na področju kohezije44 je bilo ugotovljeno, da: ο nekateri revizijski organi v poročilih podcenjujejo probleme; ο stopnje napake, o katerih poročajo, niso vedno popolnoma zanesljive; ο informacije o finančnih popravkih, o katerih poročajo države članice, morda niso vedno zanesljive in točne ter ο Komisija s svojo metodo za izračun dobi podcenjeno stopnjo preostale napake.
83 Over the 2007-2013 period, both DG EMPL and DG REGIO have strengthened their checks on audit authorities. 
83 V obdobju 2007–2013 sta GD EMPL in GD REGIO okrepila svoje preglede revizijskih organov.
The Commission now requests audit authorities to provide, in many cases, additional information on the calculation of the error rates reported in their annual control reports, such as a reconciliation of the audited population with the expenditure declared, a recalculation of the sample size or detailed information about specific audits of operations. 
Komisija zdaj zahteva, da revizijski organi v mnogih primerih zagotovijo dodatne informacije o izračunu stopenj napake, o katerih so poročali v letnih poročilih o nadzoru, kot so uskladitev revidirane populacije s prijavljenimi odhodki, ponoven izračun velikosti vzorca ali podrobne informacije o specifičnih revizijah operacij.
In addition, the two DGs undertake fact finding missions to Member States to verify the data reported by audit authorities. 
Poleg tega sta generalna direktorata zaradi ugotavljanja dejstev obiskala države članice, da bi preverila podatke, ki so jih sporočili revizijski organi.
Assessment of the Commission’s supervisory role 36 84 Based on the work of the audit authorities, the Commission publishes risk rates by Member State. 
Ocena nadzorne vloge Komisije 36 84 Na podlagi dela revizijskih organov Komisija objavi stopnje tveganja po državah članicah.
The Court has reported in its 2013 annual report that there are weaknesses in some of the data provided by the national authorities and in some aspects of the review by the Commission45. Care should be taken in using the data as a reliable indication of Member State relative success in complying with the different sets of eligibility rules and regulations. 
Sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2013 poročalo, da obstajajo slabosti v nekaterih podatkih, ki so jih zagotovili nacionalni organi, in v nekaterih elementih pregleda, ki ga je opravila Komisija.45 Pri uporabi podatkov kot zanesljivega poka-zatelja relativne uspešnosti države članice pri izpolnjevanju različnih sklopov pravil za upravičenost in predpisov je treba biti pazljiv.
85 The Commission has only limited information as to whether the systems put in place by Member States for imposing ‘corrective measures’ are effective and whether the information reported by certifying authorities is accurate, complete and reliable46. This assessment is corroborated by the Commission’s Internal Audit Service which considers that very limited assurance can be placed on the financial impact of corrective measures reported by Member States due to the way in which they are reported to the Commission, but also because audit authorities only perform limited checks on them47. 
85 Komisija ima le malo informacij o tem, ali so sistemi, ki so jih vzpostavile države članice za uvedbo popravnih ukrepov, uspešni in ali so informacije, ki jih sporočajo certifikacijski organi, točne, popolne in zanesljive.46 To oceno potrjuje služba Komisije za notranjo revizijo, ki meni, da ima lahko finančni učinek popravnih ukrepov, ki jih sporočijo države članice, zelo majhno jamstvo zaradi načina sporočanja teh ukrepov Komisiji, pa tudi zato, ker revizijski organi pri njih opravljajo samo omejene preglede.47 Komisija je v svojem odgovoru na odstavek 1.41 letnega poročila za leto 2012 navedla, da obstoječe težave povzročajo predvsem nezanesljive stopnje napake, ki jih sporočijo države članice, in da si zelo prizadeva za izboljšanje njihove zanesljivosti, predvsem v obliki popravkov navzgor, če meni, da so potrebni.
86 The Commission’s scope for validating (and, where necessary, adjusting) the reported error rates is limited as long as audit authorities are not requested to provide the Commission with specific information on their audits of operations for its verification of the annual control reports. 
86 Možnosti Komisije za potrditev (in po potrebi prilagoditev) sporočenih stopenj napake so omejene, dokler se od revizijskih organov ne bo zahtevalo, da Komisiji zaradi potrditve letnih poročil o nadzoru predložijo specifične informacije o svojih revizijah operacij.
There is a risk that the Commission underestimates residual error rate in cohesion spending 87 Overall, there is a risk that the Commission underestimates the ‘residual error rate’ and, as a result, that the Commission’s assessment of the individual OPs and the financial impact of the reservations in the annual activity reports is not sufficiently robust. 
Obstaja tveganje, da Komisija podceni stopnjo preostale napake pri porabi na področju kohezije 87 Na splošno obstaja tveganje, da Komisija podceni stopnjo preostale napake, zaradi česar ocena Komisije o posameznih operativnih programih in finančnem učinku pridržkov v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih ni dovolj zanesljiva.
88 In the special report No 16/2013 the Court recommended that the Commission should adopt a prudent approach in relying on Member States’ information on audits and ‘financial corrections’, continue to provide methodological support and guidance to national audit bodies, propose a system of sanctions for audit bodies that repeatedly underreport problems, and arrangements to share with Member States the costs of auditing the EU regional spending. 
16/2013 priporočilo, naj Komisija sprejme preudaren pristop k opiranju na informacije držav članic o revizijah in finančnih popravkih, nacionalnim revizijskim organom še naprej zagotavlja metodološko podporo in smernice, predlaga sistem sankcij za revizijske organe, ki večkrat podcenjujejo težave, ter se z državami članicami dogovori o delitvi stroškov za revizije regionalne porabe EU.
Assessment of the Commission’s supervisory role 37 Summary of key risks and weaknesses identified Risks in agriculture relate to fields, to animals and to farmers 89 The common agricultural policy of the EU is implemented through the funds of EAGF and EAFRD. 
Ocena nadzorne vloge Komisije 37 Povzetek ključnih ugotovljenih tveganj in slabosti Tveganja v kmetijstvu se nanašajo na zemljišča, živali in kmete 89 Skupna kmetijska politika EU se izvaja v okviru skladov EKJS in EKSRP.
The annual report of the Court and more specifically chapters 3 and 4 summarise, among other things, the key risks and weaknesses of agricultural spending. 
V letnem poročilu Sodišča in natančneje poglavjih 3 in 4 so med drugim povzeti ključna tveganja in slabosti porabe v kmetijstvu.
90 Agricultural subsidies are channelled through around 80 paying agencies in the 28 Member States who are responsible for making payments to beneficiaries. 
90 Kmetijske subvencije se usmerjajo prek približno 80 plačilnih agencij v 28 državah članicah, ki so odgovorne za plačila upravičencem.
The complex legal requirements on EU and national level cover significant number of measures and aid schemes in place (for instance 4 axes with 46 measures and several thousands of sub-measures in EAFRD). 
Kompleksne zakonske zahteve na ravni EU in držav članic zajemajo številne uvedene ukrepe in sheme pomoči (na primer 4 osi s 46 ukrepi in več tisoč podukrepi EKSRP).
91 The main risks with regard to the regularity of direct payments are that area aid may be paid for ineligible land, to ineligible beneficiaries or to more than one beneficiary for the same plot of land, or that entitlements are calculated incorrectly or animal premiums are paid for non-existent animals (even though these risks are mitigated to some extent by the operation of IACS, see paragraph 74). 
91 Glavna tveganja v zvezi s pravilnostjo neposrednih plačil vključujejo možnost, da se pomoč na površino izplača za neupravičeno zemljišče, neupravičenim upravičencem ali več kot enemu upravičencu za isto parcelo, da so pravice nepravilno izračunane ali da se premije za živali izplačajo za neobstoječe živali (čeprav se ta tveganja nekoliko zmanjšujejo z delovanjem IAKS; glej odstavek 74).
In the case of interventions in agricultural markets and other non-area related measures, the main risks as regards regularity are that aid is granted to ineligible applicants or for ineligible or overstated costs or products. 
Pri intervencijah na kmetijskih trgih in drugih ukrepih, ki niso vezani na površino, je glavno tveganje v zvezi s pravilnostjo možnost, da se pomoč dodeli neupravičenim prosilcem ali za neupravičene ali previsoko navedene stroške ali proizvode.
Intervention measures are mainly based on quantities declared by the beneficiaries, which cannot be checked using automated cross-checks with other databases. 
Intervencijski ukrepi temeljijo predvsem na količinah, ki jih prijavijo upravičenci in jih ni mogoče preveriti z uporabo avtomatiziranega navzkrižnega preverjanja z drugimi podatkovnimi zbirkami.
This increases the risk of error. 
To povečuje tveganje napak.
Rural development is particularly error prone 92 The EAFRD is particularly prone to error. 
Področje razvoja podeželja je še posebej dovzetno za napake 92 EKSRP je še posebej dovzeten za napake.
In addition to those mentioned above, non-compliance with the agri-environment requirements, which concern the use of agricultural production methods compatible with protection of the environment, landscape and natural resources, as well as with specific requirements for investment projects and breach of EU and/or national public procurement rules are important factors increasing risk. 
Poleg zgoraj navedenih so pomembni dejavniki, ki povečujejo tveganje napak, še neizpolnjevanje kmetijsko-okoljskih zahtev, ki se nanašajo na uporabo metod kmetijske proizvodnje, skladnih z varstvom okolja, krajine in naravnih virov, ter posebnih zahtev za naložbene projekte in kršitve evropskih in/ ali nacionalnih pravil javnega naročanja.
Assessment of the Commission’s supervisory role 38 Risks in cohesion are still dominated by weaknesses in procurement 93 The cohesion policy of the EU is implemented through the funds of ERDF, CF and ESF. 
Ocena nadzorne vloge Komisije 38 Pri tveganjih na področju kohezije še vedno prevladujejo slabosti pri javnem naročanju 93 Kohezijska politika EU se izvaja v okviru ESRR, KS in ESS.
The annual report of the Court and more specifically chapters 5 and 6 summarise, among other things, the key risks and weaknesses of cohesion spending. 
V letnem poročilu Sodišča in natančneje poglavjih 5 in 6 so med drugim povzeti ključna tveganja in slabosti porabe na področju kohezije.
94 The first risk relates to non-compliance with EU and/or national public procurement rules when awarding contracts. 
94 Prvo tveganje se nanaša na neizpolnjevanje evropskih in/ali nacionalnih pravil javnega naročanja pri oddaji javnih naročil.
For cohesion policy the poor application of procurement rules and procedures may occur deliberately in order to favour some suppliers or inadvertently because these rules are not well understood. 
Pri kohezijski politiki lahko do slabe uporabe pravil in postopkov javnega naročanja pride namenoma, in sicer zato, da bi se zagotovila prednost za nekatere dobavitelje, ali pa nenamerno zaradi slabega razumevanja pravil.
A key area of error relates to the extension or modification of existing contracts, where EU procurement rules require that a new tendering exercise shall be undertaken. 
Ključno področje napak se nanaša na razširitev ali spremembo obstoječih naročil, kadar bi bil na podlagi pravil EU o javnem naročanju potreben nov javni razpis.