natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the 1989 report (23) mentioned above (see paragraph 2), the Commission carried out a cost-benefit analysis of the various policies followed by the Member States in controlling FMD (policy of preventive vaccination, or policy of systematic slaughter), with a view to defining the strategy to be followed at Community level. 
Komisija se je v že omenjenem (glej odstavek 2) poročilu iz leta 1989 (23) lotila analize stroškov in koristi različnih politik, ki jih države članice izvajajo na področju nadzora slinavke in parkljevke (politika preventivnega cepljenja ali politika sistematičnega zakola), da bi določila strategijo, ki bi se izvajala na ravni Skupnosti.
In particular, it assessed the risk of FMD occurring in the Community if one or other of the two policies were to be applied from 1992 onwards, together with the economic effects (20) Three of the audit visits were carried out jointly with Commission staff. 
Zlasti je preučila tveganje pojava slinavke in parkljevke v Skupnosti, če bi se po letu 1992 uporabila ena ali druga (20) Tri od teh revizij so bile opravljene skupaj s službami Komisije.
(21) Beneficiaries and valuers who had established the value of the slaughtered animals were also interviewed. 
(21) Hkrati so bili zaslišani tudi upravičenci in ocenjevalci, ki so ocenili vrednost zaklanih živali.
The Office international des epizooties (OIE) in Paris, Pirbright Laboratory and the National Audit Office (NAO) in London were also visited. 
Obiskali so tudi Mednarodni urad za kužne bolezni v Parizu, laboratorij v Pirbrightu in Nacionalni revizijski urad (National Audit Office, NAO) v Londonu.
(22) International Conference on Control and Prevention of Foot-and-mouth disease, Final Report, organised by the Belgian EU Presidency, European Commission, Netherlands and United Kingdom, Brussels, 12-13 December 2001; The 2001 Outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, 21 June 2002, The Stationery Office, London; Rapport dŐinformation nĄ 405 by J-P morine of the French Senate, adopted at the Senate meeting of 21 June 2001; Foot-and-mouth disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned, Inquiry Report by Dr Iain Anderson CBE, July 2002, The Stationery Office, London; Infectious diseases in livestock, The Royal Society, July 2002; Response to the Reports of the Foot-and-mouth disease Inquiries, HM Government with the Welsh Assembly Government, November 2002; European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2002 on measures to control foot-and-mouth disease in the European Union in 2001 and future measures to prevent and control animal diseases in the European Union, and Report of the Temporary Committee on foot-and-mouth disease, European Parliament, document No A5-0405/2002. 
(22) International Conference on Control and Prevention of Foot and Mouth Disease, Final Report, Bruselj, 12.–13. december 2001, ki so jo organizirali belgijsko predsedstvo Sveta, Evropska komisija, Nizozemska in Združeno kraljestvo; The 2001 Outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, 21. junij 2002, The Stationery Office, London; Rapport d’information no 405, J.-P. Émorine iz francoskega senata, sprejeto na seji dne 21. junija 2001; Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned Inquiry, 22. julij 2002, dr. Iain Anderson CBE, The Stationery Office, London; Infectious diseases in livestock, The Royal Society, julij 2002; Odgovori na poročila „Foot and Mouth Disease Inquiries“, HM Government with the Welsh Assembly Government, november 2002; Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 17. decembra 2002 o nadzoru slinavke in parkljevke v Evropski uniji leta 2001 in ukrepih, ki se sprejmejo za preprečevanje in nadzor epidemij živalskih bolezni v Evropski uniji, ter poročilo začasnega odbora Evropskega parlamenta za slinavko in parkljevko (A5-0405/2002).
(23) Report from the Commission to the Council on a study carried out by the Commission on policies currently applied by Member States in the control of foot-and-mouth disease, Commission of the European Communities, SEC (89) 1731 final, 18 October 1989. of the two possible alternatives. 
(23) Rapport de la Commission au Conseil relatif à une étude effectuée par la Commission sur les politiques actuelles des États membres dans le domaine de la lutte contre la fièvre aphteuse, Komisija Evropskih skupnosti, SEC(89) 1731 konč. z dne 18. oktobra 1989. politika, ter gospodarske posledice v obeh primerih.
The Commission projected the costs over a period of 10 years (from 1993 to 2002) according to three different scenarios for the scale of the crises. 
Komisija je načrtovala stroške za desetletno obdobje (1993–2002) glede na tri različne scenarije razsežnosti krize.
For the non-vaccination policy it used an intermediate scenario with 13 epidemics of 20 outbreaks. 
V primeru politike necepljenja je upoštevala vmesni scenarij, po katerem bi prišlo do 13 epidemij živalskih bolezni, od katerih bi vsaka imela 20 izbruhov.
The estimated cost over the same period was 35 million euro. 
Ocenjeni stroški za to obdobje so znašali 35 milijonov EUR.
The estimate for the cost of the optimistic scenario, on the other hand, was 0,3 million euro, and that for the worst scenario was 955 million euro. 
Nasprotno je bil strošek pri optimističnem scenariju ocenjen na 0,3 milijona EUR, medtem ko bi pri pesimističnem scenariju znašal 955 milijonov EUR.
Moreover, the main emphasis of the 1989 report was on commercial considerations and consideration of budgetary and agricultural costs and profits, without taking into account the wider social and environmental costs. 
Poleg tega je poročilo iz leta 1989 v glavnem poudarilo trgovinske vidike ter stroške in dobičke na ravni kmetijstva in proračuna, ne da bi upoštevalo obsežnejše socialne in okoljske stroške.
Because of the nature of the animal disease epidemics that occurred in the Union before 2001, the Commission was unaware of the need to check whether the Community arrangements were viable. 
Epidemije živalskih bolezni, ki so se v Uniji pojavile pred letom 2001, niso bile takšne, da bi Komisijo opozorile, da je treba nujno preveriti primernost sistemov Skupnosti.
There had, in fact, been three epidemics that involved more than 20 outbreaks (the maximum possible in the scenario used by the Commission), but on the other hand, there had only been four crises in eight years (compared with thirteen in ten years according to the same scenario). 
Na eni strani so namreč tri epidemije imele več kot dvajset izbruhov (največje možno število v scenariju, ki ga je uporabila Komisija), vendar so bile na drugi strani v osmih letih samo štiri krize (v primerjavi s trinajstimi v desetih letih po istem scenariju).
On the other hand, a number of risks conducive to the spread of the virus had increased since 1993: the number of livestock movements had increased (24) with the completion of the single market, the number of abattoirs had fallen (25), leading to increased concentrations of animals and an enhanced risk of infection, while stocking densities, particularly of sheep, goats and pigs, had soared (26). 
Nasprotno se je po letu 1993 povečalo število nekaterih tveganj, ki pospešujejo širjenje virusa: število premikov živali (24) se je zaradi uvedbe enotnega trga povečalo, število klavnic se je zmanjšalo (25), kar je spodbudilo združevanje živali, in torej povečalo tveganje okužbe, medtem ko se je gostota staležev, zlasti ovac, koz in prašičev, na kmetijskih gospodarstvih povečala (26).
In February 1998 the FAO (27) drew the attention of the 33 Member States of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease to the fact that, at any time, ÔEurope may face further devastating animal disease epidemics due to long-distance transport of animals and increasingly dense livestock unitsŐ (28). 
FAO (27) je od februarja 1998 opozarjal 33 držav članic Odbora za nadzor slinavke in parkljevke, da „bi lahko prevoz živali na dolge razdalje in naraščajoča gostota števila živali kadar koli povzročila nove pogubne epidemije živalskih bolezni v Evropi“ (28).
(24) In the case of cattle, there are movements involving around three million head per year. 
(24) V primeru goveda premiki vključujejo tri milijone glav na leto.
(25) The number of abattoirs in the United Kingdom fell from 1 400 in 1990 to 400 in 1999. 
(25) Število klavnic v Združenem kraljestvu se je s 1 400 leta 1990 zmanjšalo na 400 leta 1999.
(26) Between 1987 and 1997 the density of pigs per farm had more than tripled in Ireland, and increased by more than 50 % in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and France. 
(26) Gostota staleža prašičev na gospodarstvo se je med letoma 1987 in 1997 na Irskem več kot potrojila ter na Nizozemskem, v Združenem kraljestvu in Franciji povečala za več kot 50 %.
The density of sheep per holding had also increased substantially in Spain, Ireland and the United Kingdom in particular, where it reached almost 500 head per holding, four times higher than the average density for the Union (137,9 head per holding). 
Gostota staleža ovac na gospodarstvo se je ravno tako zelo povečala v Španiji, na Irskem in zlasti v Združenem kraljestvu, kjer je dosegla skoraj 500 glav na gospodarstvo, kar pa za štirikrat presega povprečno gostoto v Uniji (137,9 glave na gospodarstvo).
The stocking density for goats increased likewise over the period, especially in Greece, Spain, France, Italy and the Netherlands. 
Ravno tako se je v tem obdobju povečala gostota staleža koz na gospodarstvo, zlasti v Grčiji, Španiji, Franciji, Italiji in na Nizozemskem.
(Structure of agricultural holdings Historic results Ń Surveys from 1966/1967 to 1997 Ń Final version: October 2000 Eurostat, p. 
(Struktura kmetijskih gospodarstev – Zgodovinski rezultati – Raziskave v obdobju od 1966/1967 do 1997 – Končna različica: oktober 2000, Eurostat, str.
88, 89 and 92). 
88, 89 in 92.)
(27) United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation. 
(27) Organizacija Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization).
(28) FAO press release 98/05. 
(28) Sporočilo za javnost FAO 98/05.
C 54/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 19. 
C 54/10 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 3.3.2005 19.
Moreover, the swine fever epidemic in 1997/1998 had generated significant costs for the Community (29), Member States and producers. 
Poleg tega je epidemija prašičje kuge v letih 1997–1998 ustvarila velike stroške za Skupnost (29), države članice in rejce.
In the light of that experience, the Commission itself judged the anti-FMD measures provided for in Directive 85/511/EEC incomplete (30). 
Z vidika te izkušnje je Komisija (30) ukrepe proti slinavki in parkljevki, predvidene v Direktivi 85/511/EGS, sama ocenila kot nepopolne.
Based on expert opinion the Commission then began to revise the Directive, but its work was interrupted when the disease broke out in the United Kingdom on 20 February 2001. 
Službe Komisije so tedaj na podlagi mnenj izvedencev začele revizijo Direktive, ko je epidemija, ki se je 20. februarja 2001 pojavila v Združenem kraljestvu, prekinila njihovo delo.
The strategy has not been fully evaluated by the Commission since its adoption in 1990. 
Komisija ni izčrpno preučila strategije vse od njenega sprejetja leta 1990.
Furthermore, the Commission has not submitted a report to the Council and the Parliament every three years on the conditions of application of Decision 90/424/EEC concerning Community eradication measures and the financial aid granted for that purpose (31). 
Poleg tega Komisija Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu vsaka tri leta ni predložila poročila o pogojih uporabe Odločbe 90/424/EGS o ukrepih Skupnosti za izkoreninjenje in finančni pomoči, dodeljeni v ta namen (31).
Neither has it updated the study of Member StatesŐ veterinary services carried out by the Directorate-General for Agriculture in 1992, even though the updated study would have enabled it to check whether they were in an adequate state to ensure that the strategy succeeded (see paragraphs 48 to 49) Commission supervision was insufficient in some respects and deficiencies in the regulations were not remedied in time 21. 
Prav tako ni posodobila študije o veterinarskih službah držav članic, ki jo je Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo opravil leta 1992, kar bi ji omogočilo, da preveri, ali njihovo stanje zadostuje za zagotovitev uspešne izvedbe strategije (glej odstavka 48–49). Komisija v nekaterih pogledih ni izvajala zadostnega nadzora, pomanjkljivosti v predpisih pa niso bile pravočasno odpravljene 21.
In normal times Commission supervision of health and veterinary aspects essentially takes two forms: firstly, its staff in Brussels verify that directives have been incorporated into national law, and secondly, inspectors from the Health and Veterinary Office (HVO) in Dublin (32) carry out on-site inspections. 
V normalnih okoliščinah se nadzor, ki ga Komisija opravlja na veterinarskem in zdravstvenem področju, v glavnem izvaja v dveh oblikah: na eni strani službe Komisije v Bruslju preverjajo prenos direktiv v nacionalno zakonodajo, na drugi strani inšpektorji Urada za prehrano in veterinarstvo (Food and Veterinary Office, FVO) iz Dublina (32) opravljajo nadzore na kraju samem.
In the period preceding the 2001 crisis the inspections required by the regulations should have focused, in the CourtŐs opinion, on the essential measures for preventing and controlling FMD that are defined in Community directives and with the transposition of them into the national law of the Member States. 
V obdobju pred krizo leta 2001 bi se morali po mnenju Sodišča nadzori v skladu s predpisi osredotočiti na bistvene ukrepe za preprečevanje in nadzor slinavke in parkljevke, določene v direktivah Skupnosti, ter na njihovo vključevanje v nacionalno zakonodajo držav članic.
Those measures include: (a) veterinary and health checks at frontiers in the case of imports of animals and animal products; (b) checks on animal feed in order to avoid contamination of animals or animal products; (29) A total of 650,5 million euro was charged to the Community budget for 1997 and 1998. 
Ti ukrepi zajemajo: (a) veterinarske in zdravstvene preglede na mejah ob uvozu živali in proizvodov živalskega izvora; (b) nadzore živalske krme, s katerimi bi preprečili okužbo živali in proizvodov živalskega izvora; (29) Za leti 1997 in 1998 je proračun Skupnosti bremenilo skupno 650,5 milijona EUR.
Court Special Report No 1/2000, paragraph 1. 
1/2000, odstavek 1.
(30) COM (2002) 736 final of 13 December 2002, p. 
(30) COM(2002) 736 konč. z dne 13. decembra 2002, str.
(31) Article 43a of Decision 90/424/EEC requires the Commission to submit a report on the conditions of its application to the Parliament and the Council every three years. 
(31) Člen 43a Odločbe 90/424/EGS od Komisije zahteva, da Parlamentu in Svetu vsaka tri leta predloži poročilo o pogojih uporabe te odločbe.
(32) Directorate F of the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection. (c) drawing-up of contingency plans by the Member States to ensure that human resources, equipment and adequate organisation can be drawn upon, should a crisis arise; (d) the drawing-up by Member States of systems for identifying and tracking animal movements and a system of messages between Member States (ANIMO), all of which are essential for tracing and slaughtering contaminated animals quickly. 
(32) Direkcija F Generalnega direktorata za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov. (c) vzpostavitev načrtov ukrepov držav članic ob nepredvidljivih dogodkih, ki bodo omogočili, da bodo ob izbruhu krize na voljo človeški viri, oprema in primerna organizacija; (d) vzpostavitev sistemov identifikacije in sledenja premikov živali s strani držav članic ter sistema obveščanja med državami članicami (ANIMO), ki so bistveni za hitro identifikacijo in zakol okuženih živali.
Transposition of Community directives into national law not systematically verified for compliance 22. 
Pri prenosu direktiv Skupnosti v nacionalne zakonodaje preverjanje skladnosti ni bilo izvedeno sistematično 22.
The Commission verifies quasi systematically the formal transposition of legislation by Member States within the time allowed by Community directives. 
Komisija skoraj sistematično preverja, ali države članice predpise Skupnosti uradno prenašajo v nacionalno zakonodajo v rokih, ki jih predvidevajo direktive Skupnosti.
Compliance tests, on the other hand, are not operated systematically. 
Nasprotno se nadzori skladnosti ne izvajajo sistematično.
In practice they are only carried out when there are HVO inspections (33) in Member States, or following complaints by third parties. 
V praksi se izvajajo samo ob inšpekcijah Urada za prehrano in veterinarstvo (33) v državah članicah ali zaradi pritožb, ki jih vložijo tretje osebe.
The risks of non-compliant transposition are thus high and may still exist now. 
Zaradi tega je tveganje neskladnega prenosa veliko in lahko obstaja še danes.
The Commission has addressed to the Member States a large number of warnings for not transposing directives in time. 
Komisija je državam članicam poslala precej uradnih opominov zaradi nepravočasnega prenosa direktiv.
When the national measures adopted were communicated the Commission archived the files, without checking them for compliance. 
Komisija je, ko je bila obveščena o sprejetju nacionalnih ukrepov, zadeve zaključila, ne da bi preverila njihovo skladnost.
Consequently, no infringement file has ever been opened by the Commission as far as non-compliance is concerned. 
Zato zaradi neskladnosti ni nikoli začela nobenega postopka zaradi kršitve.
As regards the directive on animal identification, and identification of sheep in particular, which Member States were to transpose by 1 January 1995, the Commission had sent warnings to Member States for not communicating national measures between 1993 and 1996. 
Komisija je v zvezi z direktivo o identifikaciji živali, zlasti ovac, ki so jo morale države članice prenesti do 1. januarja 1995, med letoma 1993 in 1996 državam članicam poslala uradne opomine zaradi neobveščanja o nacionalnih ukrepih.
Between 1994 and 1997 it archived the files, following formal transposition of the Community law in the Member States, without making a compliance check. 
V letih 1994–1997 je po uradnem prenosu prava Skupnosti v države članice, ne da bi preverila njihovo skladnost, zaključila spise.
During the 2001 crisis, however, the HVO pointed out that in all the Member States affected by FMD (apart from the Netherlands) there were significant omissions regarding the Directive and they had had a negative impact on the spread of the epidemic in 2001 (see paragraph 35). 
Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo je kljub temu med krizo leta 2001 v državah članicah, prizadetih zaradi slinavke in parkljevke (razen na Nizozemskem), odkril velike pomanjkljivosti pri prenosu direktive, ki so imele negativne posledice na širjenje epidemije leta 2001 (glej odstavek 35).
(33) During on-site visits the HVO also checks that the national transposing measures are effective and makes recommendations for the attention of the Commission if, amongst other things, it considers that the national measures are not in accordance with Community norms. 
(33) Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo med inšpekcijami na kraju samem poleg tega preverja učinkovitost ukrepov za prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo in oblikuje priporočila za Komisijo, zlasti kadar meni, da nacionalni ukrepi niso v skladu s standardi Skupnosti.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/11 Health and veterinary checks at Union frontiers well supervised but certain risks not adequately covered by regulations 24. 
3.3.2005 SL Uradni list Evropske unije C 54/11 Zdravstveni in veterinarski pregledi na mejah Unije so bili dobro nadzorovani, vendar pa določena tveganja niso bila ustrezno predvidena v predpisih 24.
The HVO carried out numerous health and veterinary checks at Member StatesŐ border inspection posts (BIPs) in order to check that only products that met the Community standards for animal health and food safety entered the Community territory through the BIPs. 
Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo je pred krizo opravil številne veterinarske in zdravstvene preglede na mejnih veterinarskih postajah držav članic, da bi preveril, ali prihajajo prek mejnih veterinarskih postaj na ozemlje Skupnosti samo proizvodi, ki so v skladu s standardi Skupnosti na področju zdravja živali in varnosti živil.
In cases where deficiencies were found the Commission temporarily suspended BIPsŐ approval, and in order to have the suspensions lifted Member States were fairly quick to take the corrective action required by the HVO, for example, providing additional personnel, stepping up veterinary controls, improving hygiene in installations and equipment, strengthening the systems for recording batches introduced, veterinary certificates and registers. 
Države članice so razmeroma hitro sprejele korektivne ukrepe, ki jih je zahteval Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo, kot so povečanje števila osebja in veterinarskih pregledov, izboljšanje higiene zgradb in naprav, okrepitev sistemov registracije uvoženih serij, veterinarskih spričeval in registrov, da bi odpravile začasne preklice dovoljenj za mejne veterinarske postaje, ki jih je v primeru ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti izdala Komisija.
Even though it is impossible to provide total protection against external sources of contamination, there were nevertheless a number of shortcomings in the Community regulations at the time of the crisis. They mainly concerned border-protection, especially as regards the carriage of foodstuffs by travellers and the possibility of storing in free zones products that did not comply with Community regulations (see paragraph 91(a)). 
Čeprav se je nemogoče v celoti zavarovati pred zunanjimi viri okužbe, so predpisi Skupnosti v času krize vsebovali določeno število pomanjkljivosti glede zaščite na mejah, zlasti na področju prevoza živil, ki so ga opravili potniki, in možnosti, da se v prostih conah skladiščijo proizvodi, ki niso v skladu s predpisi Skupnosti (glej odstavek 91(a)).
Before the crisis the Commission had proposed that introduction into the Community territory be limited to products of animal origin, which meet European animal health standards, but the proposal was only adopted in 2002 (34). 
Komisija je pred začetkom krize predlagala, da se na ozemlje Skupnosti uvažajo samo proizvodi živalskega izvora, ki ustrezajo evropskim standardom na področju zdravja živali, vendar je bil ta predlog sprejet šele leta 2002 (34).
Not until November 2002, after the crisis, did the Commission propose reinforcing controls on imports of products of animal origin intended for personal consumption. The Decision was adopted in December 2002 (35). 
Komisija je komaj novembra 2002 po koncu krize predlagala povečanje nadzora nad uvozom proizvodov živalskega izvora za osebno porabo, vendar je to sprejela šele decembra 2002 (35).
Delays in imposing controls and banning the use of catering waste for animal feed 26. 
Kontroliranje in prepoved uporabe odpadkov iz gostinstva za živalsko krmo sta bila prepozna 26.
The HVO inspections concerning animal feed were carried out late, partly after the crisis. 
Inšpekcije Urada za prehrano in veterinarstvo glede živalske krme so bile opravljene pozno, deloma šele po krizi.
The HVO highlighted the gaps (34) Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (OJ L 18, 23.1.2003, p. 
Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo je poudaril pomanjkljivosti pri (34) Direktiva Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi (UL L 18, 23.1.2003, str.
(35) Commission Decision 2002/995/EC of 9 December 2002 laying down interim safeguard measures with regard to imports of products of animal origin for personal consumption (OJ L 353, 30.12.2002, p. 
(35) Odločba Komisije 2002/995/ES z dne 9. decembra 2002 o začasnih zaščitnih ukrepih pri uvozu izdelkov živalskega izvora, namenjenih osebni porabi (UL L 353, 30.12.2002, str.