natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annex IV provides more detailed information per Member State related to the implementation by the end of 2015 of the Commission’s measures for the 2007‐2013 period. 
Priloga IV vsebuje podrobnejše informacije v zvezi z izvajanjem ukrepov Komisije za obdobje 2007–2013 do konca leta 2015 za posamezne države članice.
The Commission applied its preventive measures and financial corrections in a proportionate manner in the 2007‐2013 period The Commission’s measures in the 2007‐2013 period focussed on the Member States with the riskiest programmes 67. 
Komisija je preventivne ukrepe in finančne popravke v obdobju 2007–2013 nalagala sorazmerno Ukrepi Komisije v obdobju 2007–2013 so bili osredotočeni na države članice z najbolj tveganimi programi 67.
Since the 2007‐2013 programme period the Commission has calculated the “amount at risk” for each programme. 
Od programskega obdobja 2007–2013 Komisija za vsak program izračuna tvegani znesek.
These amounts are then aggregated at Member State level and published in the AAR. 
Ti zneski se nato združijo na ravni države članice in objavijo v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih.
These indicators present the programmes’ risk for the given year and they show the potential amount of ineligible expenditure co‐financed for each programme or Member State on the basis of the information available to the Commission. 
Ti kazalniki predstavljajo tveganje v zvezi s programom za neko proračunsko leto in prikazujejo potencialni znesek neupravičenih sofinanciranih odhodkov za vsak program ali državo članico na podlagi informacij, ki jih ima na voljo Komisija.
As the Commission’s measures should mostly affect the riskiest programmes, there is likely to be a correlation between the distribution of the amount at risk and the distribution of financial corrections imposed by the Commission. 
Ker morajo imeti ukrepi Komisije največji učinek na najbolj tvegane programe, je zelo verjetno, da je med porazdelitvijo tveganih zneskov in porazdelitvijo finančnih popravkov, ki jih naloži Komisija, korelacija.
We therefore analysed whether such a correlation exists. 
Sodišče je zato analiziralo, ali takšna korelacija obstaja.
Programme risk indicator by Member State correlated with confirmed/decided financial corrections 69. 
Med kazalnikom tveganja v zvezi s programi za posamezno državo članico in potrjenimi/sprejetimi finančnimi popravki je bila korelacija 69.
The difference between the “amount at risk” and the Commission’s and Member State’s financial corrections is the cumulative residual risk (CRR) (see paragraphs 32 to 33). 
Razlika med „tveganim zneskom” in finančnimi popravki države članice in Komisije je kumulativno preostalo tveganje (glej odstavka 32 in 33).
When assessing the OPs, the Commission requires that financial corrections imposed by Member 41 30 Article 89.1a of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. States and by the Commission are high enough to ensure that this indicator is below a 2 % materiality threshold31. 
Pri ocenjevanju operativnih programov Komisija zahteva, da so finančni popravki, ki jih naložijo države članice in Komisija, dovolj visoki, da ta kazalnik ostane pod pragom pomembnosti 2 %.31 70.
70. Figure 9 shows the programme risk level by Member State as indicated by the Commission’s amount at risk and the level of Commission’s financial corrections per Member State for the 2007‐2013 period. 
Slika 9 prikazuje ravni tveganja v zvezi s programi po državah članicah, kot jih je navedla Komisija na podlagi tveganih zneskov in stopnje finančnih popravkov Komisije na državo članico za obdobje 2007–2013.
The correlation analysis also displays the trend line (the overall relation for the Member States between the programme risk and the financial corrections imposed by the Commission) as well as the 45 line (points where financial corrections would equal the programme risk level). 
Pri analizi korelacije sta vidni tako trendna črta (skupna povezava za države članice med tveganjem v zvezi s programi in finančnimi popravki, ki jih je naložila Komisija) kot črta 45°.
Our correlation analysis shows that the trend line is below the 45 line (see Figure 9). 
Naša analiza korelacije kaže, da je trendna črta pod črto 45 (glej sliko 9).
This indicates that financial corrections imposed by the Commission are generally at a lower level than the amount at risk. 
To kaže, da so finančni popravki, ki jih je naložila Komisija, v splošnem na nižji stopnji kot tvegani znesek.
This can be explained by two factors: - the risk of co‐financing ineligible expenditure (amount at risk) is partly addressed by the financial corrections already imposed as a result of Member State controls without the issue reaching the Commission; and - the Commission requires that financial corrections bring the CRR below the 2 % materiality threshold (and not to zero). 
To je mogoče pojasniti z dvema dejavnikoma: − tveganje sofinanciranja neupravičenih odhodkov (tveganega zneska) je deloma že obravnavano s finančnimi popravki, ki so bili naloženi na podlagi rezultatov kontrol držav članic, ne da bi zadeva prišla do Komisije, in − Komisija zahteva, da se s finančnimi popravki stopnja kumulativnega preostalega tveganja zniža pod 2 % prag pomembnosti (vendar ne na nič).
Most of the Member States are close to the trend line. 
Večina držav članic je blizu trendne črte.
This indicates that the level of financial corrections imposed by the Commission overall correlates with the Commission’s assessment of the amount at risk32. 
To kaže, da je stopnja finančnih popravkov, ki jih naloži Komisija, v splošnem povezana z oceno Komisije glede tveganih zneskov.32 31 32 39 Glej str.
31 32 42 See AAR 2015 of DG Regional and Urban Policy, p. 
75 Letnega poročila o dejavnostih za leto 2015 GD za regionalno in mestno politiko in str.
75 and AAR of DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, p. 
50 Letnega poročila o dejavnostih GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje.
The 0.65 correlation coefficient suggests a positive moderate correlation between the amount at risk and the level of financial corrections at Member State level. 
Korelacijski koeficient 0.65 kaže na zmerno pozitivno korelacijo med tveganim zneskom in ravnijo finančnih popravkov na ravni države članice.
The correlation coefficient is an indicator, which shows the degree to which the movement in two variables are associated. 
Korelacijski koeficient je kazalnik, ki kaže, koliko so premiki dveh spremenljivk povezani.
Its possible values range between ‐1 and 1, the two extreme points indicating a perfect negative or positive link and zero indicating no link, i.e. the two variables move independently of each other. 
Njegove mogoče vrednosti so med –1 in 1, pri čemer skrajni točki pomenita popolno negativno ali pozitivno korelacijo, 0 pa kaže na ničelno korelacijo, tj. spremenljivki se gibata neodvisno ena od druge.
Where Member States are significantly above the trend line, the level of financial corrections is higher than the potential amount at risk indicated for the Member State’s programmes. 
Če so države članice znatno nad trendno črto, je stopnja finančnih popravkov višja od potencialnega tveganega zneska, navedenega v programih držav članic.
This is, for example, the case for Slovakia, Romania and Ireland. 
To na primer velja za Slovaško, Romunijo in Irsko.
Where Member States are significantly below the trend line, the level of financial corrections imposed by the Commission is lower than the potential amount at risk indicated for the Member State’s programmes. 
Če so države članice precej pod trendno črto, je stopnja finančnih popravkov, ki jih je naložila Komisija, nižja od potencialnega tveganega zneska, navedenega za programe države članice.
This is, for example, the case for France and Spain, which both applied financial corrections on their own initiative. By doing this, they avoided additional financial corrections being imposed by the Commission. 
To na primer velja za Francijo in Španijo, ki sta obe izvedli finančne popravke na lastno pobudo, in se tako izognili dodatnim finančnim popravkom, ki bi jih naložila Komisija. 40
43 Figure 9 ‐ Comparison between the amount at risk and confirmed/decided Commission financial corrections in the 2007‐2013 programme period in cohesion Notes: The size of the circles corresponds to the financial envelope allocated to each Member State. 
Potrjeni/sprejeti finančni popravki/plačila Slika 9 – Primerjava med tveganim zneskom in potrjenimi/sprejetimi finančnimi popravki Komisije na področju kohezije za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 4,00% 3,50% 3,00% Romunija 2,50% 2,00% Bolgarija Češka 1,50% 1,00% Latvija 0,50% Estonija 0,00% Finska -0,50 % 0,0 % 1,0 % 2,0 % 3,0 % 4,0 % 5,0 % 6,0 % Luksemburg Malta Portugalska ETC Poljska Francija Litva Danska Cyprus Hrvaška Švedska Nizozemska Avstrija Španija Nemčija Združeno kraljestvo Slovenija Madžarska Grčija Belgija I talija Irska Znesek, pri katerem obstaja tveganje / plačila Opombe: Velikost krogov ustreza skupnim finančnim sredstvom, dodeljenim posamezni državi članici.
European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes are implemented by more than one Member State. 
Programe evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja izvajata najmanj dve državi članici.
Source: European Court of Auditors based on information provided by the Commission. 44 
Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Komisija.
The relation between the level of financial correction and the amount at risk is also influenced by ongoing cases. 
Na povezavo med ravnijo finančnih popravkov in tveganim zneskom vplivajo tudi nezaključeni primeri.
Cases which have not yet reached the final stage of the procedure are included in the amount at risk, while the possible future financial corrections resulting from these cases are not yet reflected in the numbers. 
Primeri, ki še niso prešli v končno fazo postopka, so vključeni v tvegani znesek, potencialni prihodnji finančni popravki, do katerih bo morda prišlo zaradi teh primerov, pa še niso odraženi v številkah.
This is particularly the case for Spain where 20 operational programmes were under suspension and for a further seven programmes, payment claims were interrupted as of the end of 2015 (representing 70 % of all on‐going preventive measures). 
To še zlasti velja za Španijo, kjer je bilo začasno ustavljenih 20 operativnih programov, za nadaljnjih sedem programov pa so bili ob koncu leta 2015 prekinjeni zahtevki za plačilo (kar predstavlja 70 % vseh nezaključenih preventivnih ukrepov).
The Commission’s internal procedures for the 2007‐2013 period aim to ensure harmonised treatment of cases across programmes and Member States 76. 
Namen notranjih postopkov Komisije za obdobje 2007–2013 je zagotoviti usklajeno obravnavanje primerov v okviru vseh programov in v vseh državah članicah 76.
The Commission should ensure harmonised treatment of cases across programmes and Member States and that preventive measures and financial corrections are implemented before payments are resumed. 
Komisija bi morala zagotoviti, da se primeri v okviru vseh programov in v vseh državah članicah obravnavajo usklajeno in da se preventivni ukrepi in finančni popravki izvršijo pred nadaljevanjem plačil.
We therefore analysed the Commission’s internal procedures for imposing preventive measures and financial corrections, for accepting preventive measures and financial corrections as implemented and verified how these procedures work in practice. 
Sodišče je zato analiziralo notranje postopke Komisije za nalaganje preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov, za potrditev preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov kot izvršenih, ter preverilo, kako ti postopki delujejo v praksi.
Decisions on payment interruptions and suspensions and financial corrections are discussed and agreed upon by senior management committees. 77. 
O sklepih v zvezi s prekinitvami in začasnimi ustavitvami plačil in finančnimi popravki razpravljajo in odločajo odbori na ravni višjega vodstva 77.
For the 2007‐2013 programme period, the Directorate‐General for Regional and Urban Policy and the Directorate‐General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion set up their own Interruptions, Suspensions and Financial Corrections Committees (ISFCC). 
Za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 sta GD za regionalno in mestno politiko in GD za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje ustanovila lastna odbora za prekinitve, začasne ustavitve in finančne popravke (ISFCC).
These committees provide a forum within each directorate‐general to discuss matters and take decisions related to warnings, interruptions, suspensions and financial corrections (see also Annex I). 
Ta odbora sta forum v vsakem od generalnih direktoratov, v okviru katerega se razpravlja in odloča o opozorilih, prekinitvah plačil, začasnih ustavitvah plačil in finančnih popravkih (glej tudi Prilogo I).
Both committees meet on a regular basis and consist of the director‐general, the deputy director‐general(s), relevant directors and representatives of the legal units. 
Oba odbora se redno sestajata, sestavljajo pa ju generalni direktor, namestnik ali namestniki generalnega direktorja, ustrezni direktorji in predstavniki pravnih služb.
The meetings of the ISFCC ensured a better overview and discussion of all cases and procedures related to preventive measures and financial corrections within the Directorate‐ General to help to harmonise treatment of cases and inform senior management of the ongoing issues. 45 
S sestanki odbora ISFCC sta bila zagotovljena boljši pregled in razprava o vseh primerih in postopkih v zvezi s preventivnimi ukrepi in finančnimi popravki v generalnem direktoratu, da bi se pripomoglo k uskladitvi obravnave primerov, višje vodstvo pa obveščalo o nezaključenih vprašanjih. 42
The management and follow‐up of preventive measures and financial corrections required a significant commitment in terms of time and staff resources 79. 
Upravljanje in nadaljnje spremljanje preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov sta zahtevala veliko časa in človeških virov 79.
In order to lift preventive measures and resume payments Member State authorities must generally propose measures aimed at correcting systems so as to prevent errors occurring in the future. 
Da bi se preventivni ukrepi odpravili in da bi se nadaljevala plačila, morajo države članice na splošno predlagati ukrepe za izboljšavo sistemov, da bi se preprečilo pojavljanje napak v prihodnosti.
These are called remedial action plans (see Annex I). 
Ti ukrepi se imenujejo načrti popravljalnih ukrepov (glej Prilogo I).
Within our sample of 20 programmes, the Commission requested a remedial action plan to be set up in 44 of the 72 cases examined (see paragraph 38). 
V našem vzorcu 20 programov je Komisija zahtevala predložitev načrta popravljanih ukrepov v 44 od 72 preučenih primerov (glej odstavek 38).
Member States then need to inform the Commission that a remedial action plan has been implemented. 
Države članice morajo nato obvestiti Komisijo, da je bil načrt popravljalnih ukrepov izveden.
The Commission has several ways of assessing whether the conditions for lifting have been fulfilled: (a) first, the Commission systematically reviews the information sent by Member State authorities (generally by the managing authorities of the OPs concerned). (b) second, the Commission may also ask the audit authority to confirm the information provided by the managing authority. 
Komisija ima na voljo več načinov, da oceni, ali so bili pogoji za odpravo ukrepov izpolnjeni: (a) prvič: Komisija sistematično preveri informacije, ki so jih poslali organi držav članic (običajno organi upravljanja zadevnih operativnih programov); (b) drugič: Komisija lahko tudi zaprosi revizijski organ, naj potrdi informacije, ki jih je predložil organ upravljanja.
Of these 44, the audit authority’s validation was requested in 31 cases for 18 of the 20 programmes. 
Od teh 44 primerov je Komisija zaprosila za potrditev revizijskega organa v 31 primerih za 18 od 20 programov.
In these cases, the Commission obtained additional assurance regarding the appropriateness of the actions proposed by the Member State authorities. (c) third, the Commission can perform its own follow‐up of cases in the Member States. 
V teh primerih je Komisija pridobila dodatno zagotovilo o ustreznosti ukrepov, ki so jih predlagali organi držav članic; (c) tretjič: Komisija lahko opravi lastno nadaljnje spremljanje primerov v državah članicah.
Cases for follow up audits are selected on a risk basis: where the Commission cannot rely on the work of the audit authority or where additional information is needed. 
Primeri, za katere se opravi nadaljnje spremljanje, se izberejo na podlagi tveganja: kadar se Komisija ne more zanesti na delo revizijskega organa ali kadar so potrebne dodatne informacije.
Overall, the Commission carried out 62 follow‐up audits of action plans in relation to 70 OPs in the 2007‐2013 programme period. 
Skupaj je Komisija izvedla 62 naknadnih revizij akcijskih načrtov v zvezi s 70 operativnimi programi v programskem obdobju 2007–2013.
The management and follow‐up of preventive measures and financial corrections required a significant commitment in terms of time and staff resources from the Directorates‐General. 
Vodenje in nadaljnje spremljanje preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov je zahtevalo veliko časa in človeških virov generalnega direktorata.
Holding back large payments from the EU budget to Member States is also politically sensitive and the Commission is in close contact with Member States to ensure that the conditions for lifting measures are in place. 
Zadrževanje velikih plačil iz proračuna EU državam članicam je tudi politično občutljivo vprašanje, zato Komisija tesno sodeluje z državami članicami, da bi zagotovila vzpostavitev pogojev za odpravo ukrepov.
Some cases are even discussed between ministers or heads of state and Directors‐General and Commissioners. 46 
O nekaterih primerih potekajo razprave celo med ministri ali voditelji držav in generalnimi direktorji in komisarji.
The Commission’s corrective measures put pressure on Member States to address weaknesses in their management and control systems Preventive measures and financial corrections generally deal with complex issues which take a considerable time to resolve 82. 
Popravljalni ukrepi Komisije pomenijo pritisk na države članice, naj obravnavajo slabosti v svojih sistemih upravljanja in kontrole S preventivnimi ukrepi in finančnimi popravki se večinoma obravnavajo kompleksne zadeve, katerih razreševanje je dolgotrajno 82.
Commission procedures related to preventive measures and financial corrections should be as quick as possible, while taking account of the complexity of the issues. 
Postopki Komisije, povezani s preventivnimi ukrepi in finančnimi popravki, bi morali biti čim hitrejši ob upoštevanju kompleksnosti zadev.
We therefore analysed the 72 cases in our sample to determine the total duration and the length of the different phases of the procedures. 
Sodišče je zato analiziralo 72 primerov v vzorcu, da bi ugotovilo skupno trajanje postopkov in dolžino različnih faz.
The duration of the Commission’s procedures does not equal the length of the payment blockage (see paragraph 93). 
Trajanje postopkov Komisije ni enako trajanju ustavitve plačil (glej odstavek 93).
The Commission’s procedure starts with the triggering event and lasts either until the preventive measure is lifted or until the financial correction is implemented. It is therefore longer than the payment blockage which starts with the first preventive measure and lasts until the lifting of the preventive measure (see Annex I). 
Postopek Komisije se začne z dogodkom, ki povzroči uvedbo postopka, in traja do odprave preventivnega ukrepa ali do izvedbe finančnega popravka, zato traja dlje od ustavitve plačil, ki se začne s prvim preventivnim ukrepom in traja do odprave preventivnega ukrepa (glej Prilogo I).
Procedures resulting in financial corrections took up to 21 months in the 2007‐2013 period 84. 
Postopki, ki so privedli do finančnih popravkov, so v obdobju 2007–2013 trajali do 21 mesecev 84.
Figure 10 presents the results of our analysis of the cases in our sample as regards the time taken to carry out preventive measures and financial correction procedures. 
Na sliki 10 so predstavljeni rezultati analize štirih primerov v vzorcu, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, v smislu časa, potrebnega za izvedbo preventivnih ukrepov in postopkov za finančne popravke.
The average length of the procedures from the triggering event until the preventive measure was lifted or the financial correction was implemented varied from 10 to 21 months. 
Povprečno trajanje postopkov od dogodka, ki je povzročil uvedbo postopka, do odprave preventivnega ukrepa ali izvedbe finančnega popravka je bilo 10 do 21 mesecev.
The longest was when both preventive measures and financial corrections were involved and the shortest was when there were only preventive measures. 47 
Najdlje je trajalo, če so se izvajali preventivni ukrepi in finančni popravki, najmanj pa, če so se izvajali samo preventivni ukrepi. 44
Figure 10 – Average length of preventive and financial correction procedures for cases examined from the 2007‐2013 programme period (month) Source: European Court of Auditors based on information provided by the Commission. 
Slika 10 – Povprečno trajanje preventivnih ukrepov in postopkov finančnih popravkov za preučene primere iz programskega obdobja 2007–2013 (v mesecih) Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Komisija.
Procedures resulting in preventive measures were mostly triggered by Member State’s own audits and take half the time 85. According to the Commission, two thirds of preventive measures were triggered by national audit results33. 
Po navedbah Komisije sta bili dve tretjini preventivnih ukrepov uvedeni zaradi rezultatov nacionalnih revizij.33 Tako je bilo tudi v 12 od 16 primerov v vzorcu Sodišča.
The duration of these procedures is significantly shorter: there is no need to spend time on establishing the problems; the time is spent on finding ways of resolving them. 
Trajanje teh postopkov je bistveno krajše: čas se ne porabi za ugotavljanje problemov, temveč za iskanje rešitev.
In our sample, 17 of the 28 cases involving only financial corrections and 13 of the 28 mixed cases were triggered by Commission audits. 
V vzorcu Sodišča so bili postopki v 17 od 28 primerov, ki so zajemali samo finančne popravke, in 13 od 28 mešanih primerov uvedeni zaradi revizij Komisije.
These cases take much longer to resolve, in particular if the Commission imposes financial corrections. 
Reševanje teh primerov traja dlje, zlasti če Komisija naloži finančne popravke.
One reason for the lengthy procedures involving financial corrections is that these usually relate to complex problems and Member States almost always initially contest the Commission’s findings. 
Eden od razlogov za dolgotrajnost postopkov, ki obsegajo finančne popravke, je, da se običajno nanašajo na kompleksne probleme in da države članice sprva skoraj vedno izpodbijajo ugotovitve Komisije.
In order to establish an error, the issues found need to go through a fact clearing procedure between the Member State and the Commission, which takes time. 
Preden se ugotovi napaka, je treba ugotovljene zadeve obravnavati v postopku razčiščevanja dejstev med državo članico in Komisijo, ki lahko traja dolgo.
48 10.1 17.5 20.8 cases with only financial corrections (28 cases) cases with a combination of preventive measures and financial corrections (28 cases) cases with only preventive measures (16 cases) 0 6 12 18 24 (months) 33 See AAR 2015 of DG Regional and Urban Policy, p. 
33 45 Primeri, v katerih so bili uporabljeni samo finančni popravki (28 primerov) Primeri, v katerih je bila uporabljena kombinacija preventivnih ukrepov in finančnih popravkov (28 primerov) Primeri, v katerih so bili uporabljeni samo preventivni ukrepi (16 primerov) (v mesecih) 0 6 12 18 24 10,1 17,5 20,8 Glej Letno poročilo o dejavnostih Generalnega direktorata za regionalno in mestno politiko za leto 2015, str.
The regulation specifies deadlines for Member States’ replies to the Commission’s information requests. 
V uredbi so določeni specifični roki za odgovore držav članic na zahteve Komisije po informacijah.