natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See for instance Article 5(1) Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Glej na primer člen 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
relations with the beneficiary firm or helping to increase their skills or knowledge base by providing business advice or networking opportunities. 
podjetjem, ali pomoč pri krepitvi njihovega znanja ali spretnosti z zagotavljanjem poslovnega svetovanja ali možnosti za mreženje.
Such indirect results were not specified as a strategic objective in any of the OPs covered by the audit. 
Taki posredni rezultati niso bili opredeljeni kot strateški cilj v nobenem od operativnih programov, ki so bili zajeti v revizijo.
Furthermore, none of the audited projects included such indirect results as explicit operational objectives. 
Poleg tega taki posredni rezultati v nobenem od revidiranih projektov niso bili določeni kot izrecni operativni cilji.
Without such operational objectives or related indicators at project level, it is not possible to aggregate this information in order to measure indirect results at regional level. 
Brez takšnih operativnih ciljev ali z njimi povezanih kazalnikov na projektni ravni ni mogoče zbrati teh informacij, da bi se na njihovi podlagi izmerili posredni rezultati na regionalni ravni.
Without systematic measurement and reporting by the MAs of the spill-over effects for the regions, the causal links between EU-funded investments in the private sector and regional development were difficult to establish. 
Ker organi upravljanja niso sistematično merili učinkov prelivanja v regijah in o njih poročali, je bilo težko ugotoviti vzročne povezave med naložbami v zasebni sektor, ki so bile financirane s sredstvi EU, in regionalnim razvojem.
At project level, the achievement and durability of indirect results is inherently difficult to identify. 
Na ravni projektov je doseganje in trajnost posrednih rezultatov samo po sebi težko ugotoviti.
It was, for example, difficult to prove the causal link between the EU projects and their employment effects at regional level. 
Težko je bilo na primer dokazati vzročno povezavo med projekti EU in njihovimi učinki na zaposlovanje na regionalni ravni.
Contributions to Cohesion policy objectives such as innovation, networking and knowledge sharing (see paragraph 4) only featured in the rare cases where projects involved collaboration or networking with higher education institutions. 
Prispevki k ciljem kohezijske politike, kot so inovacije, mreženje in izmenjava znanja (glej odstavek 4), so se pojavili le v redkih primerih, pri katerih so projekti obsegali sodelovanje ali mreženje z visokošolskimi ustanovami.
Nonetheless, a number of projects examined did contribute to indirect results. 
Kljub temu pa je več preučenih projektov prispevalo k posrednim rezultatom.
For instance, projects whose direct results were at least to some degree durable (see paragraphs 26 to 31) also generated economic or social benefits for the local communities or the regions in which they were located, including through local suppliers and service providers. 
Na primer, projekti, katerih neposredni rezultati so bili vsaj nekoliko trajni (glej odstavke 26 do 31), so ustvarili tudi ekonomske ali družbene koristi za lokalne skupnosti ali regije, v katerih so se izvajali, tudi preko lokalnih dobaviteljev in izvajalcev storitev.
Permanent and skilled jobs were created through those investments which also resulted in additional economic activity in the region. 
Z naložbami so se ustvarila stalna in kvalificirana delovna mesta, ki so spodbudila dodatno gospodarsko dejavnost v regiji.
Other indirect results were: lower pollution, waste and noise35, greater energy efficiency36, the re-vitalisation of brownfield 27 35 36 Projects 33, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40 and 41. 
Drugi posredni rezultati so bili: manj onesnaženja, odpadkov in hrupa35, večja energetska učinkovitost36, ponovna oživitev degradiranih območij37 in večji promet zunaj Projekti 33, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40 in 41.
sites37, and higher turnover beyond the region or increased exports38. 
27 35 36 37 regije ali povečanje izvoza38.
Furthermore, in many cases, the regions benefited from higher tax revenues thanks to the investments. 
Poleg tega so imele regije v številnih primerih koristi zaradi večjih prihodkov od davkov zaradi naložb.
However, in the rare cases where contributions to indirect results could be identified, they were not always durable. 
Vendar tudi v tistih redkih primerih, pri katerih je bilo ugotovljeno prispevanje k posrednim rezultatom, ti rezultati niso bili vedno trajni.
For instance, the stakeholders in the Puglia region had identified structural weaknesses in, and the generally small size of, the SMEs as a drawback for regional development and employment creation39. To counter this, one of the OP measures made it a pre-condition that project applicants other than large companies had to form consortia with other SMEs in order to apply for ERDF grants, hoping that the consortia would continue to exist after the end of the projects. 
Na primer: deležniki v regiji Apulija so ugotovili, da strukturne slabosti pri MSP ter njihova povprečna majhnost negativno vplivajo na regionalni razvoj in ustvarjanje delovnih mest.39 Da bi rešili ta problem, je bil pri enem od ukrepov operativnega programa določen pogoj, da morajo prijavitelji projektov, razen velikih podjetij, oblikovati konzorcije z drugimi MSP, da bi lahko vložili zahtevek za nepovratna sredstva iz ESRR, pri čemer so upali, da bodo konzorciji ohranjeni tudi po koncu projektov.
However, in two of the audited projects, this objective was not achieved due to the relevant partners’ lack of commitment to the project goals and the artificial nature of the consortia (see Box 5). 
Toda v dveh projektih, ki jih je Sodišče revidiralo, ta cilj ni bil dosežen zaradi pomanjkanja zavezanosti zadevnih partnerjev k ciljem projekta in umetne narave konzorcijev (glej okvir 5).
28 Box 5 - Examples of non-durable indirect project results Projects 29 and 31 (Puglia/Italy OP) - Projects implemented by consortia of SMEs Under one measure of the OP, in order to help strengthen SMEs to enable them to contribute more to driving economic growth, they were only allowed to apply as consortia. 
28 Okvir 5 – Primeri posrednih rezultatov projektov, ki niso bili trajni Projekta 29 in 31 (operativni program Apulije, Italija) – Projekti, ki so jih izvedli konzorciji MSP Pri enem od ukrepov v okviru operativnega programa so se MSP lahko prijavila samo kot konzorciji, da bi bila močnejša in bi tako lahko bolje prispevala k spodbujanju gospodarske rasti.
Project 29: total investment costs of 25 million euro. 
Projekt 29: skupni stroški naložbe 25 milijonov EUR.
Grant amount: 16 million euro, including 8 million euro from the ERDF. 
Znesek nepovratnih sredstev: 16 milijonov EUR, vključno z 8 milijoni EUR iz ESRR.
Project 31: total investment costs of 5 million euro. 
Projekt 31: skupni stroški naložbe 5 milijonov EUR.
Grant amount: 3 million euro, including 1.5 million euro from the ERDF. 
Znesek nepovratnih sredstev: 3 milijoni EUR, vključno z 1,5 milijona EUR iz ESRR.
Each project had two partners: a leading company and a second company which played a marginal role. 
Vsak projekt je imel dva partnerja: vodilno podjetje in drugo podjetje, ki je imelo postransko vlogo.
Following the completion of the project, the secondary companies either continued to play a marginal role or were no longer active in the market. 
Po zaključku projekta sta sekundarni podjetji bodisi imeli še naprej postransko vlogo bodisi nista bili več dejavni na trgu.
The consortia were dissolved some time after project completion or during implementation. 
Konzorcija sta bila nekaj časa po zaključku projekta ali med njegovim izvajanjem razpuščena.
This shows that the consortia were created artificially to ensure eligibility for the project. 
To kaže, da sta bila konzorcija ustvarjena umetno, da bi se dosegla upravičenost projekta.
As a result, the benefits for the region, particularly economic growth and additional jobs, did not materialise40. 37 38 39 40 Projects 8, 14 and 15. 
Zaradi tega se koristi za regijo, predvsem gospodarska rast in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest, niso uresničile.40 38 39 40 Projekta št.
Projects 16 and 17 under the OP Lower Saxony and projects 19, 21, 23 and 24 under the OP Saxony. 
19, 21, 23 in 24 v okviru operativnega programa Saške.
See the study by the OECD ‘Italy: Key issues and policies, OECD studies on SMEs and entrepreneurship’ (2014). 
Glej študijo OECD: Italy: Key issues and policies, OECD studies on SMEs and entrepreneurship (2014).
This was also stated in a 2014 OECD study: “Italy: Key issues and policies, OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship”. 
To je bilo navedeno tudi v študiji, ki jo izdala OECD leta 2014: Italy: Key issues and policies, OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship.
Programming, selecting and monitoring projects insufficiently focused on durability 44. 
Pri načrtovanju, izbiri in spremljanju projektov ni bilo dovolj osredotočenosti na trajnost 44.
There may be numerous reasons why durable project results are achieved (or not), and numerous practices that influence their achievement. 
Za doseganje (ali nedoseganje) trajnih rezultatov projektov lahko obstajajo številni razlogi, nanj pa vplivajo tudi mnoge prakse.
Such reasons can be identified both at project level and at a strategic (or programme/OP) level. 
Razloge je mogoče ugotoviti tako na ravni projektov kot na strateški ravni (ali na ravni programa/operativnega programa).
Promotion of durability in OP programming was weak 45. 
Spodbujanje trajnosti pri načrtovanju operativnih programov je bilo slabo 45.
Our assessment was based on good and bad practices in relation to the promotion of durability in the OPs, including the consideration of relevant risks. 
Naša ocena je temeljila na dobrih in slabih praksah v zvezi s spodbujanjem trajnosti v operativnih programih, upoštevali pa smo tudi relevantna tveganja.
We also examined that extent to which the MAs had analysed the needs of business in the corresponding regions as well as the market failures they encountered. 
Preučili smo tudi, koliko so organi upravljanja analizirali potrebe podjetij v zadevnih regijah ter primere nedelovanja trga, s katerimi so se srečevala.
Finally we looked at how the legal durability requirements were implemented. 
Nazadnje smo preučili, kako so se izvajale zakonodajne zahteve glede trajnosti.
Even at the strategic planning level, we identified various weaknesses which might explain why a significant share of the projects audited did not achieve durable/long-lasting results, or did so only partially. 
Že na ravni strateškega načrtovanja smo našli različne slabosti, na podlagi katerih je mogoče pojasniti, zakaj pri velikem deležu revidiranih projektov niso bili doseženi trajni/dolgotrajni rezultati ali so bili ti doseženi le deloma.
When setting up the OPs, the MAs generally took insufficient action to support durability through appropriate policy measures and conditions beyond the legal requirements (see paragraph 12). 
Pri oblikovanju operativnih programov organi upravljanja v splošnem niso storili dovolj, da bi k doseganju trajnosti pripomogli z določitvijo ustreznih ukrepov in pogojev na področju relevantnih politik, ki bi bili strožji od zakonodajnih zahtev (glej odstavek 12).
Durability has not been a priority in the OPs 47. 
Trajnost v operativnih programih ni bila prioriteta 47.
Until 2013, but most notably in the programme period ending in 2006, there was a lack of emphasis on durability of results in the OPs. 
Do leta 2013, zlasti pa v programskem obdobju, ki se je končalo leta 2006, v operativnih programih ni bilo dovolj poudarka na trajnosti rezultatov.
While not a legal requirement, none of the audited OPs addressed the need to ascertain whether investment projects were producing durable results. 
Čeprav to po zakonu ni obvezno, pri nobenem od revidiranih operativnih programov ni bila obravnavana potreba, da se preveri, ali naložbeni projekti dajejo trajnostne rezultate.
Although the OPs entailed wider economic development objectives, such as increased employment and improved regional competitiveness, they did not emphasise the importance of long term results. 
V operativnih programih so sicer bili določeni širši cilji glede gospodarskega razvoja, kot sta povečanje zaposlenosti ter izboljšana regionalna konkurenčnost, vendar v njih ni bil izpostavljen pomen dolgoročnih rezultatov.
Durability had not been an objective in the OPs or in other strategic documents, and there was no dedicated indicator to measure it. 
Trajnost ni bila cilj v operativnih programih ali drugih strateških dokumentih, prav tako pa ni bilo posebnega kazalnika za njeno merjenje.
Neither the OPs nor other planning documents of the sectoral business support programmes addressed the risks to the achievement of durability of project results, so did not envisage any mitigation measures. 
Niti v operativnih programih niti v drugih dokumentih za načrtovanje programov sektorske podpore podjetjem ni bilo upoštevano tveganje nedoseganja trajnosti pri rezultatih projektov, zato v njih niso bili predvideni nobeni blažilni ukrepi.
Furthermore, the strategic planning documents did not set out precisely either the desired indirect results for the regions or the mechanisms for measuring them (see also paragraphs 40 to 43). 
30 za strateško načrtovanje niso bili natančno določeni niti želeni posredni rezultati za regije niti mehanizmi za njihovo merjenje (glej tudi odstavke 40 do 43).
The national authorities did not collect statistics about the survival rates of business entities supported with EU funding or about the reasons for non-durable project results. 
Nacionalni organi niso zbrali statističnih podatkov o stopnji preživetja gospodarskih subjektov, ki so prejeli podporo sredstev EU, ali o razlogih, zakaj nekateri rezultati projektov niso bili trajni.
They did not conduct any benchmarking of the success of businesses supported with public money versus those not receiving any support. 
Opravili niso nobene primerjalne analize uspešnosti podjetij, ki so prejela podpro iz javnih sredstev, in tistih, ki niso prejela nobene podpore.
The Commission’s main aim in providing ERDF co-financing for business support measures was to have an economic impact, the durability of the investments’ results was only a side aspect. 
Glavni cilj Komisije pri zagotavljanju sofinanciranja ESRR za ukrepe podpore podjetjem je bil gospodarski učinek, trajnost rezultatov naložb je bila le stranski vidik.
Thus, its main concern in relation to durability was satisfying the requirements under EU law. 
Zato je bila njena glavna skrb v zvezi s trajnosti to, da so bile izpolnjene zakonodajne zahteve EU.
The Commission did not provide the MAs with guidance on project selection and design or with any other support for promoting durability of results. 
Komisija organom upravljanja ni zagotovila navodil o izboru in zasnovi projektov niti kakršnekoli druge podpore za spodbujanje trajnosti rezultatov.
The needs assessments were weak and the actual need for public funding was not properly identified 51. 
Ocene potreb so bile slabe, dejanske potrebe po javnih sredstvih pa niso bile ustrezno opredeljene 51.
Durability implies that public funding is used for projects that can best contribute to the OPs’ objectives. 
Trajnost pomeni, da se javna sredstva namenijo projektom, ki lahko najbolj prispevajo k ciljem operativnega programa.
Needs assessments contribute to the overall durability by allowing identifying the activities / businesses that are the most relevant to the attainment of the OPs’ objectives as well as the businesses most in need of public funding, those for which no solutions can be found in the market or where market conditions are not conducive to triggering private investments for accompanying their needs (‘market failure’). 
Z ocenami potreb se prispeva k skupni trajnosti, saj je z njimi mogoče opredeliti tiste dejavnosti/podjetja, ki so najbolj ustrezni za doseganje ciljev operativnih programov, ter podjetja, ki najbolj potrebujejo javno financiranje, tj. tista, za katera ni mogoče najti rešitve na trgu ali pri katerih tržne razmere ne omogočajo pridobitve zasebnih naložb, ki bi ustrezale njihovim potrebam („nedelovanje trga”).
If the beneficiaries did not have a genuine need for public support but instead would have made the same decisions without aid, there is a greater risk of deadweight loss. 
Kadar upravičenci niso imeli resnične potrebe po javni podpori in bi se enako odločili tudi brez pomoči, je bilo tveganje za nepotrebne izgube večje.
Also, less beneficiaries genuinely having a need for public funding would receive them hence the overall durability is reduced. 
Poleg tega bi javna sredstva prejelo manj upravičencev, ki jih dejansko potrebujejo, zato bi bila skupna trajnost manjša.
While the OPs audited included some elements of a needs assessment, none of them, or the relevant ex-ante evaluations preceding the OPs, included thorough analyses of the companies’ actual needs (e.g. those of large vs small companies) in the relevant regions in terms of investment support. 
Revidirani operativni programi so sicer vsebovali nekaj elementov ocene potreb, vendar v nobenem od njih niti v zadevnih predhodnih vrednotenjih, ki so bila opravljena pred operativnimi programi, ni bilo temeljite analize dejanskih potreb podjetij (npr. potreb velikih v primerjavi s potrebami malih podjetij) v zadevnih regijah, kar zadeva naložbeno podporo.
No detailed surveys, dedicated research or similar preparatory activities were conducted to identify the needs of the most vulnerable sectors before designing the business support measures. 
pripravljalne dejavnosti, da bi se pred zasnovo ukrepov podpore za podjetja ugotovile potrebe najbolj ranljivih sektorjev.
In particular, the needs assessments presented in the relevant Austrian, Italian and Polish OPs regarding business support were weak. 30 
Slabe so bile zlasti ocene potreb v zvezi s podporo podjetjem, ki so bile predstavljene v zadevnih operativnih programih Avstrije, Italije in Poljske.
In several cases (the Saxony and Lower Saxony OPs, and to a certain extent also the Czech and Italian OPs), the initial situation of the businesses in the regions concerned was described relatively comprehensively, including the particular constraints they faced in investing and creating additional employment. 
V več primerih (v operativnih programih Saške in Spodnje Saške in do neke mere tudi v operativnih programih Češke republike in Italije) je bil izhodiščni položaj podjetij v zadevnih regijah opisan dokaj celovito, vključno s specifičnimi omejitvami, s katerimi so se soočala pri naložbah in ustvarjanju dodatnih delovnih mest.
Other OPs lacked clear regional plans for mitigating those constraints, e.g. improving access to finance, leveraging private financing, increasing production, turnover, exports or productivity, and introducing new products. 
V drugih operativnih programih ni bilo jasnih regionalnih načrtov za zmanjšanje takšnih omejitev, npr. z izboljšanjem dostopa do financiranja, privabljanjem zasebnega financiranja, povečevanjem proizvodnje, prometa, izvoza ali produktivnosti in uvedbo novih izdelkov.
Moreover, there were no plans stating how the ERDF would add value in bringing about longer-term change in the business sector, including deeper restructuring processes needed in parallel to economic effects on employment or business competitiveness. 
Poleg tega ni bilo načrtov, v katerih bi bilo določeno, kako bo ESRR dosegel dodano vrednost z zagotavljanjem dolgoročnih sprememb v poslovnem sektorju, med katere poleg ekonomskih učinkov na zaposlenost ali konkurenčnosti podjetji sodijo tudi nujni temeljiti procesi prestrukturiranja.
Furthermore, the OPs did not clearly identify the companies’ actual need for public funding, or the market failures, in the various regions. 
Poleg tega v operativnih programih niso bile jasno opredeljene dejanske potrebe podjetij po javnem financiranju ali nedelovanje trga v različnih regijah.
As a consequence, sound explanations were lacking as to why certain companies should receive EU funds to invest in their asset bases (e.g. based on the sector, size, business potential or degree of innovation). 
Zato so manjkala utemeljena pojasnila, zakaj bi morala določena podjetja prejeti sredstva EU za naložbe v svoje osnovno premoženje (npr. na podlagi sektorja, velikosti, potenciala za inovacije ali stopnje inovacij).
Except for the Czech central OP, none of the audited OPs provided any justification demonstrating the eligibility of large firms for ERDF co-financing. 
Razen v osrednjem operativnem programu Češke republike v nobenem od revidiranih operativnih programov ni bilo nobene utemeljitve, s katero bi se dokazovala upravičenost velikih podjetij do sofinanciranja iz ESRR.
MAs assumed that practically all firms located in a convergence region, or in an otherwise structurally weak region, were encountering market failures and therefore needed public investment support, which is not necessarily the case. 
Organi upravljanja so predpostavljali, da so se skoraj vsa podjetja iz konvergenčnih ali sicer strukturno šibkih regij soočala z nedelovanjem trga in so zato potrebovala javno podporo za naložbe, kar pa ne drži nujno.
Furthermore, the OPs and investment projects addressed practically no market failures other than (potential) capital constraints or access to loans, whereas SMEs face other disadvantages41 compared with larger firms.The need for public intervention to combine financial assistance with non-financial support (i.e. diagnostics, advice or access to specialist infrastructure) was neglected. 
Poleg tega z operativnimi programi in naložbenimi projekti ni bil obravnavan skoraj noben primer nedelovanja trga, razen (potencialnih) kapitalskih omejitev ali dostopa do posojil, pri tem pa se MSP soočajo z drugačnimi slabostmi41 kot velika podjetja.
The Commission did not address the risk of deadweight loss in relation to the EU funds when endorsing the audited OPs, for instance by highlighting such risks in the OPs or by providing guidance on how to select relevant projects. 
Komisija pri odobritvi revidiranih operativnih programov ni obravnavala tveganja mrtvih izgub v zvezi s sredstvi EU, na primer s poudarjanjem takih tveganj v operativnih programih ali z zagotavljanjem navodil glede izbire ustreznih projektov.
31 41 addition to existing national or regional grant schemes supporting enterprises. 
Pri več operativnih programih so bila sredstva iz sklada ESRR dodeljena dodatno k obstoječim nacionalnim ali regionalnim shemam nepovratnih sredstev za podporo podjetjem.
Based on long-term experience in the Member States, these grant schemes generally provided for meaningful investments. 
Na podlagi dolgoletnih izkušenj v državah članicah se je s temi shemami nepovratnih sredstev podpora v splošnem zagotavljala smiselnim naložbam.
However, the fact that the EU funds complemented national and private investments did not suggest that they were likely to result in a higher number or quality of competing project applications. 
Ni bilo mogoče sklepati, da bodo zaradi dopolnjevanja nacionalnih in zasebnih naložb s sredstvi EU te sheme prejele več konkurenčnih projektnih prijav ali prijave, ki bodo bolj kakovostne.
Moreover, the EU funding did not foster improved durability of project results beyond the legal requirements (e.g. through the requirement of more efficient controls and reporting or the imposition of stricter conditions), as it was not linked to the pursuit of long-term results. 
Poleg tega se s financiranjem EU ni spodbudilo izboljšanje trajnosti rezultatov projektov, ki bi presegala zakonodajne zahteve (npr. z zahtevo po učinkovitejših kontrolah in poročanju ali z določitvijo strožjih pogojev), saj financiranje ni bilo povezano s prizadevanji za dolgoročne rezultate.
Focus on legal durability requirements 57. 
Osredotočenost na zakonodajne zahteve glede trajnosti 57.
The Member States were also responsible for accurately implementing the EU’s legal durability requirements. 
Države članice so bile odgovorne tudi za natančno izvajanje zakonodajnih zahtev EU glede trajnosti.