natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recommendation 6 Đ in Turkey The Commission accepts this recommendation. (a) The Commission will continue to engage with the Turkish authorities on this issue with the aim to ensure full data access for implementing partners, with due consideration of the applicable legal framework. Scale up monitoring and reporting of the Facility for refugees 8 
Priporočilo 6 – Izboljšati spremljanje in poročanje instrumenta za begunce v Turčiji Komisija sprejema to priporočilo. (a) Komisija bo še naprej sodelovala s turškimi organi v zvezi s tem vprašanjem, da se zagotovi poln dostop do podatkov za izvajalske partnerje ob upoštevanju veljavnega pravnega okvira. (c) Komisija ugotavlja, da namen tega instrumenta ni usklajevanje celotne pomoči EU za begunce v Turčiji; njegova pooblastila za spremljanje in poročanje se nanašajo zgolj na pomoč iz instrumenta.
The Commission is already preparing, in a separate context, a Global Report on the Implementation of funding related to the migration crisis which will complement the specific reporting of the Facility. 
Komisija v drugačnem okviru že pripravlja globalno poročilo o izvajanju financiranja v zvezi z migracijsko krizo, ki bo dopolnjevalo specifično poročanje instrumenta.
The Facility for Refugees in Turkey is the EU response to the European Council's call for significant additional funding to support refugees in Turkey. 
Instrument za begunce v Turčiji je odziv EU na poziv Evropskega sveta k znatnemu dodatnemu financiranju za podporo beguncem v Turčiji.
It is a mechanism for coordinating and streamlining aid from the EU and its Member States. 
Gre za mehanizem za usklajevanje in racionalizacijo pomoči EU in njenih držav članic.
Our audit examined whether the Facility effectively supported the refugees in Turkey by focusing on the management of the Facility, and on the results achieved so far under its humanitarian strand. 
Sodišče je preučilo, ali je instrument uspešno podprl begunce v Turčiji, in se pri tem osredotočilo na upravljanje instrumenta in dosedanje rezultate v okviru njegovega humanitarnega sklopa.
We found that, in a challenging context, the Facility for Refugees in Turkey rapidly mobilised Ű3 billion to provide a swift response to the refugee crisis. 
Ugotovilo je, da je instrument za begunce v Turčiji v težavnih razmerah hitro mobiliziral 3 milijarde EUR, s čimer se je omogočil hiter odziv na begunsko krizo.
We therefore conclude that the Facility could have been more effective, and that it could achieve more value for money. 
Zato je prišlo do zaključka, da bi instrument lahko bil uspešnejši in da bi lahko dosegel večjo stroškovno učinkovitost.
EN 2018 Special Report NO 34 Office accommodation of EU institutions – Some good management practices but also various weaknesses (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
SL 2018 Posebno poročilo št. 34 Pisarniški prostori institucij EU – nekatere dobre prakse upravljanja, toda tudi različne slabosti (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
Contents Executive summary Introduction Audit scope and approach Audit Scope Audit approach Observations The institutions apply common principles and cooperate extensively The institutions define their building strategies but some are outdated and do not include scenario planning The institutions apply common decision-making principles Inter-institutional cooperation is extensive The institutions to some extent opt for New Ways of Working, but have not yet assessed the costs and benefits of implemented NWoW projects Decisions regarding office accommodation are well-founded, but construction project financing mechanisms are often complex thereby affecting budgetary transparency Host countries generally offer support and preferential conditions to the institutions On the whole, decisions on obtaining office accommodation were sound Financing mechanisms of large construction projects are often complex thereby affecting budgetary transparency Major construction projects are affected by delays and, in some cases, by substantial cost overruns The Court of Justice’s project: within budget and on schedule The Council’s Europa project: within budget but delayed The Parliament’s KAD II project: significant delays leading to additional costs The Commission's JMO II project: delays and additional costs Monitoring and reporting are insufficient Paragraph I-VIII 01-04 05-08 05-07 08 09-89 09-27 10-13 14-19 20-22 23-27 28-42 31-35 36-37 38-42 43-54 44 45-47 48-50 51-54 55-69 2 
Kazalo Povzetek Uvod Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Obseg revizije Revizijski pristop Opažanja Institucije uporabljajo skupna načela in veliko sodelujejo Institucije so določile nepremičninske strategije, vendar so nekatere zastarele in ne vključujejo načrtovanja scenarijev Institucije uporabljajo skupna načela odločanja Obsežno medinstitucionalno sodelovanje Odstavek I-VIII 01-04 05-08 05-07 08 09-89 09-27 10-13 14-19 20-22 23-27 28-42 31-35 36-37 38-42 43-54 44 45-47 48-50 51-54 55-69 Institucije se v določeni meri odločajo za nove načine dela, vendar še niso ocenile stroškov in koristi izvedenih projektov novih načinov dela Odločitve glede pisarniških prostorov so dobro utemeljene, mehanizmi za financiranje gradbenih projektov pa so pogosto kompleksni in zato vplivajo na proračunsko preglednost Države gostiteljice institucijam na splošno zagotavljajo podporo in preferencialne pogoje Na splošno so bile odločitve o pridobivanju pisarniških prostorov preudarne Mehanizmi za financiranje velikih gradbenih projektov so pogosto kompleksni in so zato vplivali na proračunsko preglednost Na velike gradbene projekte vplivajo zamude in v nekaterih primerih znatne prekoračitve stroškov Projekt Sodišča Evropske unije: v skladu s proračunom in roki Projekt Sveta za zgradbo Europa: v skladu s proračunom, vendar zamuja Projekt Parlamenta za zgradbo KAD II: zaradi znatnih zamud so nastali dodatni stroški Projekt Komisije za zgradbo JMO II: zamude in dodatni stroški Spremljanje in poročanje sta nezadostna 2
The institutions monitor various aspects but not indicators related to efficient use and cost of buildings The available data is not standardised, so institutions cannot easily be compared Surface indicators are comparable between institutions but costs vary considerably Average office surfaces are comparable Negotiated rents are generally below market levels but rents per person vary significantly between buildings The cost of construction and acquisition depends on the type of the building Conclusions and recommendations Annexes Annex I — Calculation methodology for surface and cost indicators Annex II — List of buildings mentioned in the report Acronyms and abbreviations Glossary Audit team Replies of the European Parliament Replies of the Council of the European Union Replies of the European Commission Replies of the Court of Justice Replies of the European Central Bank 56-62 63-69 70-89 72-79 80-86 87-89 90-101 3 
Institucije spremljajo različne vidike, vendar ne kazalnikov, povezanih z učinkovito uporabo in stroški zgradb Razpoložljivi podatki niso standardizirani, zato institucij ni mogoče enostavno primerjati Kazalniki površin so med institucijami primerljivi, stroški pa se precej razlikujejo Povprečne površine pisarn so primerljive Najemnine, dosežene s pogajanji, so na splošno nižje od tržnih ravni, vendar se najemnine na osebo med zgradbami precej razlikujejo Stroški gradnje in nakupa so odvisni od vrste zgradbe Zaključki in priporočila Priloge Annex I — Priloga I – Metodologija izračuna kazalnikov površin in stroškov Annex II — Seznam nepremičnin, omenjenih v poročilu Kratice in okrajšave Glosar Revizijska ekipa Odgovor Evropskega parlamenta Odgovor Sveta Evropske Unije Odgovor Evropske komisije Odgovor Sodišča Evropske unije Odgovor Evropske centralne banke 56-62 63-69 70-89 72-79 80-86 87-89 90-101 3
Executive summary I The institutions spend around 11 % of their budget for administrative expenditure on buildings. 
Povzetek I Institucije za upravne odhodke za zgradbe porabijo približno 11 % svojega proračuna.
The composition of the buildings portfolio differs and depends on each institution’s mandate and organisational structure, nevertheless a significant share of the space used is devoted to office accommodation. 
Sestava portfeljev nepremičnin se razlikuje ter je odvisna od mandata institucije in njene organizacijske strukture, pri čemer je velik delež uporabljenega prostora namenjen pisarniškim prostorom.
The Commission has the largest buildings portfolio of which more than 80 % is used as office space. 
Komisija ima največji portfelj nepremičnin, od katerih se jih več kot 80 % uporablja za pisarne.
II In order to address the overall question “Is EU spending on office accommodation managed efficiently?” we examined whether the EU institutions with most office accommodation (Parliament, Council, Commission, Court of Justice and ECB): (a) establish building strategies and cooperate in order to achieve cost savings; (b) obtain their office accommodation in an efficient manner; (c) monitor and report on their office accommodation portfolio appropriately. 
II Za odgovor na vprašanje, ali je upravljanje porabe EU za pisarniške prostore učinkovito, je treba preučiti, ali institucije EU, ki imajo največ pisarniških prostorov (Parlament, Svet, Komisija, Sodišče Evropske unije in ECB): (a) pripravljajo nepremičninske strategije in sodelujejo, da bi prihranile stroške; (b) učinkovito pridobivajo pisarniške prostore; (c) ustrezno spremljajo svoj portfelj pisarniških prostorov in poročajo o njem.
III Overall, we found that the institutions manage their spending on office accommodation efficiently, but the building strategies are not always formalised and the related planning is not optimal; financing mechanisms of the large construction projects we analysed were often complex and thereby in some cases affected budgetary transparency. 
III Na splošno je bilo ugotovljeno, da institucije učinkovito upravljajo svojo porabo za pisarniške prostore, vendar nepremičninske strategije niso vedno uradno potrjene, s tem povezano načrtovanje pa ni optimalno. Mehanizmi za financiranje velikih gradbenih projektov, ki jih je Sodišče analiziralo, so bili pogosto kompleksni in so v nekaterih primerih vplivali na proračunsko preglednost.
Most of these projects were affected by delays and, in some cases, substantial additional costs. 
Pri večini teh projektov je prišlo do zamud, v nekaterih primerih pa tudi do znatnih dodatnih stroškov.
The monitoring and reporting of the buildings portfolio of most institutions is not adequate. IV The institutions cooperate and apply similar decision-making principles. 
Spremljanje portfelja nepremičnin večine institucij in poročanje o njem nista ustrezna.
However, they set out their main principles and objectives for property management in various documents. 
IV Institucije sodelujejo in uporabljajo podobna načela odločanja, vendar svoja glavna načela in cilje za upravljanje nepremičnin določajo v različnih dokumentih.
Some are outdated and some are being implemented without formal approval. 
Nekateri so zastareli, nekateri pa se izvajajo brez uradne odobritve.
At the time of the audit, the institutions had not yet evaluated the implemented New Ways of Working (NWoW) projects. 
V času revizije institucije še niso ocenile izvedenih projektov novih načinov dela.
V The host countries offer to the institutions preferential conditions for purchasing or renting office accommodation and support them in their major construction projects. 
V Države gostiteljice institucijam ponujajo preferencialne pogoje za nakup ali najem pisarn in jih podpirajo pri pomembnih gradbenih projektih.
Most of these projects were delayed, in some cases leading to additional costs. 4 
Večina teh projektov je zamujala, kar je v nekaterih primerih pomenilo dodatne stroške. 4
VI Most institutions do not monitor regularly indicators related to efficient use and cost of buildings for their internal management purposes. 
VI Večina institucij za namene notranjega upravljanja kazalnikov, povezanih z učinkovito uporabo in stroški zgradb, ne spremlja redno.
While the institutions with their buildings in Brussels and Luxembourg agreed on harmonisation in the measurement of surfaces, the data are not fully standardised and comparing them is difficult. 
Čeprav so se institucije, ki imajo svoje stavbe v Bruslju in Luxembourgu, dogovorile o uskladitvi glede merjenja površin, podatki niso popolnoma standardizirani, zato jih je težko primerjati.
The reporting to the budgetary authorities on buildings does not allow for comparison and efficiency analysis. 
Poročanje proračunskim organom o zgradbah ne omogoča primerjave in analize učinkovitosti.
VII Our analysis shows that the use of office space is comparable between institutions. 
VII Iz analiz Sodišča je razvidno, da je uporaba pisarn med institucijami primerljiva.
Moreover, we found that the rents the institutions negotiated were generally below market levels. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da so bile najemnine, ki so jih institucije dosegle s pogajanji, na splošno nižje od tržnih ravni.
Further analysis of rented buildings shows that the annual rents per person vary significantly per building. 
Nadaljnje analize najema zgradb kažejo, da se letne najemnine na osebo med zgradbami zelo razlikujejo.
The costs of construction and acquisition reflects the nature of the building. 
Stroški gradnje in nakupa so odvisni od vrste zgradbe.
VIII On the basis of the observations in this report, we recommend that the institutions should: (a) Update and formalise their building strategies and regularly update planning documents ; (b) Evaluate the New Ways of Working projects; (c) Increase budgetary transparency of the use of financing mechanisms for construction projects; (d) Set up adequate management procedures for large construction and renovation projects; and (e) Improve consistency of data and monitoring of the buildings portfolio. 5 
VIII Na podlagi opažanj v tem poročilu Sodišče priporoča institucijam, naj: (a) posodobijo in uradno potrdijo svoje nepremičninske strategije ter redno posodabljajo dokumente za načrtovanje; (b) ocenijo projekte novih načinov dela; (c) izboljšajo proračunsko preglednost uporabe mehanizmov za financiranje gradbenih projektov; (d) vzpostavijo primerne postopke upravljanja za večje gradbene projekte in projekte prenove ter (e) izboljšajo skladnost podatkov in spremljanje portfelja nepremičnin. 5
Introduction 01 Spending on buildings represents around 11 % (€1 billion) of the total administrative expenditure of the European Union’s (EU) institutions 1, as shown in Figure 1. 
Uvod 01 Poraba za zgradbe predstavlja približno 11 % (1 milijardo EUR) vseh upravnih odhodkov institucij Evropske unije (EU)1, kot je prikazano na sliki 1.
This percentage remained stable over the last five years, although it decreased in relation to the situation ten years ago. 
Ta delež se v zadnjih petih letih ni spreminjal, čeprav se je glede na stanje pred desetimi leti zmanjšal.
Around two thirds of spending on buildings concerns the cost of acquiring and renting buildings, with the remainder spent mainly on maintenance, security and energy. 
Približno dve tretjini porabe za zgradbe se nanašata na stroške nakupa in najema zgradb, preostanek pa se porabi zlasti za vzdrževanje, varovanje in energijo.
Figure 2 shows that there are differences between the institutions. 
Na sliki 2 je prikazano, da obstajajo razlike med institucijami.
These differences mainly reflect the differences in their buildings portfolios. 
Te razlike so zlasti posledica razlik v njihovih portfeljih nepremičnin.
Figure 1 – Administrative expenditure of the EU institutions 6 7% 4% Rents and buildings acquisition Other buildings-related expenditure Other administrative expenditure 89 % Source: ECA, based on the EU general budget for the financial year 2018. 1 Parliament, Council, Commission, Court of Justice, ECA, EEAS, Committees (Committee of the Regions and European Economic and Social Committee). 
Slika 1 – Upravni odhodki institucij EU 6 7% 4% Najemnine in nakupi zgradb Drugi odhodki, povezani z zg ra dbami Drugi upravni odhodki 89 % Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi splošnega proračuna EU za proračunsko leto 2018 1 Parlament, Svet, Komisija, Sodišče Evropske unije, Evropsko računsko sodišče, ESZD, odbora (Odbor regij ter Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor).
For example, the Commission devotes the majority of its accommodation to offices. 
Komisija na primer večino prostorov nameni za pisarne.
Other institutions such as the Parliament, the Council and the Court of Justice use more of other types of areas, such as meeting rooms, assembly rooms, courtrooms and public reception areas. 
Druge institucije, kot so Parlament, Svet in Sodišče Evropske unije, pogosteje uporabljajo druge vrste prostorov, kot so sejne sobe, sejne dvorane, sodne dvorane in sprejemni prostori.
Office areas5 represent approximately 70 % of the total6 and are mostly located The ECB and EIB are not included in this analysis because the annual accounts of these institutions do not include details on budgetary expenditure on buildings. 
Pisarniške površine5 predstavljajo približno 70 % vseh prostorov6 in so večinoma v Bruslju, Luxembourgu, Strasbourgu in ECB in EIB v to analizo nista vključeni, saj zaključna računa teh institucij ne vključujeta podrobnih podatkov o proračunskih odhodkih za zgradbe.
Total net surface above ground; ECB excluded. 
Skupna neto nadzemna površina; ECB ni upoštevana.
Source: ‘Comparaison des coûts entre les Institutions dans le domaine immobilier’, CPQBF Juin 2005. The report does not include the ECB. 
Vir: Comparaison des coûts entre les Institutions dans le domaine immobilier, Odbor za proračunska in finančna vprašanja, junij 2005.
Figure 3 shows the total net surface occupied by the institutions and the proportion of office area. 
Na sliki 3 je prikazana skupna neto površina, ki jo zasedajo institucije, in delež pisarniških površin.
Figure 3 – Office areas as a proportion of total surface occupied 8 84 % Commission Parliament Council ECB 92 % Court of Justice Committees 76 % EEAS 99 % ECA 95 % 0 200 400 600 800 Office area Non-office space 1 000 1 200 Thousands m2 55 % 52 % 58 % Source: ECA, based on the annual reports on buildings and data provided by the institutions. 04 The seats of the institutions depend on political decisions. 
Slika 3 – Pisarniške površine kot delež skupne zasedene nadzemne površine 8 84 % Komisija Parlament Svet ECB Sodišče Evropske unije Odbora ESZD Evropsko računsko sodišče 76 % 99 % Pisarniške površine Drugi prostori 1 000 55 % 52 % 92 % 58 % 95 % 0 200 400 600 800 1 200 V tisočm2 Vir: Evropsko računsko sodišče na podlagi letnih poročil o zgradbah in podatkov, ki jih predložijo institucije 04 Sedeži institucij so odvisni od političnih odločitev.
The most recent political agreement on the location of the seats of the institutions was made in 1992 at the European Council meeting in Edinburgh. 
Zadnji politični dogovor o lokaciji sedežev institucij je bil sklenjen leta 1992 na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Edinburgu.
Audit scope and approach Audit Scope 05 In order to address the overall question “Is EU spending on office accommodation managed efficiently?” we examined whether the EU institutions: o establish building strategies and cooperate in order to achieve cost savings; o obtain their office accommodation in an efficient manner; o monitor and report on their office accommodation portfolio appropriately. 
Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Obseg revizije 05 Za odgovor na vprašanje, ali je upravljanje porabe EU za pisarne učinkovito, je treba preučiti, ali institucije EU: o pripravljajo nepremičninske strategije in sodelujejo, da bi prihranile stroške; o učinkovito pridobivajo pisarniške prostore; o ustrezno spremljajo svoj portfelj pisarniških prostorov in poročajo o njem.
06 The audit focused on the five institutions with the most office accommodation (Parliament, Council, Commission, Court of Justice and ECB), covering their office accommodation in Brussels, Luxembourg and Frankfurt7. Where possible, the audit compared data and management procedures of these institutions with those of the European Economic and Social Committee, the European Committee of the Regions, the European External Action Service (EEAS), the European Court of Auditors (ECA) and the European Investment Bank (EIB). 
06 Revizija je bila osredotočena na pet institucij z največ pisarniškimi prostori (Parlament, Svet, Komisija, Sodišče Evropske unije in ECB), pri čemer je zajela njihove pisarniške prostore v Bruslju, Luxembourgu in Frankfurtu.7 Če je bilo mogoče, so se pri reviziji podatki in postopki upravljanja teh institucij primerjali s podatki in postopki upravljanja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora, Odbora regij, Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (ESZD), Evropskega računskega sodišča (ECA) in Evropske investicijske banke (EIB).
07 We did not analyse buildings used for purposes other than office accommodation (e.g. conference centres, technical facilities, etc.) or buildings with less than 20 % office space. 
07 Zgradbe, ki se ne uporabljajo za pisarniške prostore (npr. konferenčni centri, tehnični objekti itd.), ali zgradbe z manj kot 20 % pisarn niso bile analizirane.
The audit mainly focused on the cost of obtaining office accommodation. 
Revizija je bila osredotočena zlasti na stroške pridobivanja pisarniških prostorov.
It did not cover maintenance, cleaning, security or other buildings-related operating costs. 
Pri tem ni zajela vzdrževanja, čiščenja, varovanja ali drugih operativnih stroškov, povezanih z zgradbami.
Audit approach 08 We carried out our audit from September 2017 to June 2018 and based our observations on the following sources of evidence: o institutions’ building strategies and reports to budgetary authorities; o questionnaires and visits to the institutions; A complete list and map of buildings occupied by the EU institutions can be found on the Commission’s website: Official directory of the European Union (http://europa.eu/whoiswho/public/index.cfm?fuseaction=idea.hierarchy&nodeID=10). 
Revizijski pristop 08 Sodišče je revizijo izvajalo od septembra 2017 do junija 2018, opažanja pa so temeljila na naslednjih virih dokazov: o nepremičninskih strategijah institucij in poročilih proračunskim organom; o vprašalnikih in obiskih institucij; Popoln seznam in zemljevid zgradb, ki jih zasedajo institucije EU, se nahaja na spletišču Komisije: uradni imenik Evropske unije (http://europa.eu/whoiswho/public/index.cfm?fuseaction=idea.hierarchy&nodeID=10).
o questionnaires and visits to other international organisations; o internal audit work where applicable; o technical/measurement reports on buildings; o accounting, financial and contractual information on buildings; o visits to inter-institutional bodies and host-country authorities. 
o vprašalnikih in obiskih drugih mednarodnih organizacij; o notranjem revizijskem delu, če je bilo ustrezno; o tehničnih poročilih/poročilih o merjenju v zvezi z zgradbami; o računovodskih, finančnih in pogodbenih informacijah o zgradbah; o obiskih medinstitucionalnih organov in organov držav gostiteljic.
10 Observations The institutions apply common principles and cooperate extensively 09 We examined whether the EU institutions define a strategy that includes principles and objectives for their property management. 
10 Opažanja Institucije uporabljajo skupna načela in veliko sodelujejo 09 Sodišče je preučilo, ali so institucije EU določile strategijo, ki vključuje načela in cilje za njihovo upravljanje nepremičnin.
We examined whether these strategies are complemented with short to medium-term planning based on a regular assessment of needs. 
Preučilo je, ali so te strategije dopolnjene s kratkoročnimi do srednjeročnimi načrti, ki temeljijo na rednem ocenjevanju potreb.
We reviewed whether the strategic and/or planning documents include scenario planning. 
Pregledalo je, ali strateški dokumenti in/ali dokumenti za načrtovanje vključujejo načrtovanje scenarijev.