natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These objectives are to be used by the Member States (MS) in their programming When approving the Rural Development Plans (RDPs), the Commission carries out an analysis to assess that programmes and measures are consistent with the Community strategic guidelines, the national strategy plans and comply with the relevant legal provisions. 
Te cilje morajo države članice uporabiti pri njihovem programiranju. Komisija ob potrditvi načrtov za razvoj podeželja izvede analizo za oceno, da so programi in ukrepi skladni s strateškimi smernicami Skupnosti, nacionalnimi strateškimi načrti in ustreznimi zakonskimi določbami.
V. (b) For multi-year programmes such as the Rural Development Programmes, certain results and impacts can only be properly assessed well into the programming period, and afterwards through evaluations. 
V. (b) Za večletne programe, kot so programi razvoja podeželja, se lahko določeni rezultati in vplivi ustrezno ocenijo le, ko že preteče nekaj časa programskega obdobja in pa pozneje prek vrednotenj.
Furthermore, useful information is provided by the Annual Progress Reports on implementation as regards financial execution and outputs. 
Poleg tega letna poročila o napredku posredujejo koristne informacije o izvajanju v zvezi s finančnim izvajanjem in izložki.
Moreover, the Commission publishes in their entirety the evaluations carried out on its behalf, together with their quality assessments on the Europa site, and transmits them to the European Parliament, Council and Court of Auditors. 
Poleg tega Komisija na spletni strani Europa objavi celotna vrednotenja, izvedena v njenem imenu, skupaj z zadevnimi ocenami kakovosti in jih posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu računskemu sodišču.
45 V. (c) The Commission considers that, where available, the Commission - for the design - and the Member States - for the implementation - have used the available monitoring and evaluation input. 
45 V. (c) Komisija meni, da je skupaj z državami članicami uporabila vložek spremljanja in vrednotenja, kjer je bil na voljo, Komisija za zasnovo, države članice pa za izvajanje.
Monitoring information is used to support the case for Rural Development Programme modification. 
Informacije o spremljanju se uporabljajo za podporo sprememb programa razvoja podeželja.
Similarly, the Mid-Term Evaluations served a steering function, as a number of Rural Development Programme modifications were linked to Mid-Term Evaluations findings. 
Podobno so vmesna vrednotenja imela krmilno funkcijo, saj je bilo več sprememb programa razvoja podeželja povezanih z ugotovitvami vmesnih vrednotenj.
The information available through the monitoring and evaluation system, while incomplete and possibly not always fully reliable, was the best available at this stage, taking into account financial and practical limitations faced by the Commission and Member States. 
Informacije, ki so bile na voljo prek sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja, so bile nepopolne in verjetno včasih tudi nezanesljive, a ob upoštevanju finančnih in praktičnih omejitev Komisije in držav članic so bile na tej stopnji tudi najboljše, ki so bile na voljo.
The Commission together with Member States undertook an exercise in 2008 and 2009 to fill in gaps in Rural Development Programmes. 
Komisija se je skupaj z državami članicami leta 2008 in 2009 namenila zapolniti vrzeli v programih razvoja podeželja.
For each Rural Development Programme, the Commission services have pointed out the missing targets and targets not adequately quantified and invited Managing Authorities to improve their set of targets. 
Za vsak program razvoja podeželja so službe Komisije izpostavile manjkajoče ciljne vrednosti in ciljne vrednosti, ki niso bile zadostno količinsko opredeljene, organe za upravljanje pa pozvale, naj izboljšajo sklop ciljnih vrednosti.
This exercise led to improve significantly the set of targets via Rural Development Programme modifications. 
Tako se je prek sprememb programa razvoja podeželja sklop ciljnih vrednosti bistveno izboljšal.
The Commission has proposed solutions for a number of problems related to the Monitoring and Evaluation system for the next programming period, however, there will always be the need to find a balance between the benefits of monitoring and evaluation and the costs and administrative burden related to it. 
Komisija je predlagala rešitve za več težav, povezanih s sistemom spremljanja in vrednotenja, za naslednje programsko obdobje, vendar bo potreba po ravnovesju med koristmi spremljanja in vrednotenja ter povezanimi stroški in upravnim bremenom vedno obstajala.
The Commission considers that it has to be prudent when setting quantified targets in relation to objectives, which are affected by many external factors (e.g. the economic climate). 
Komisija meni, da mora biti preudarna pri določanju količinsko opredeljenih ciljnih vrednosti v zvezi s cilji, na katere vplivajo mnogi zunanji dejavniki (npr. gospodarske razmere).
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION VII. (a) The justification for the proposed Rural Development Programmes modifications is already a legal requirement. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE VII. (a) Utemeljitev za predlagane spremembe programov razvoja podeželja je že zakonska zahteva.
The Commission will continue to monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of programmes and towards the end of the period will increasingly focus on results. 
Komisija bo še naprej spremljala uspešnost in učinkovitost programov, proti koncu obdobja pa se bo vse bolj osredotočala na rezultate.
The Commission and Member States use the available information in the framework of monitoring and evaluation. 
Komisija in države članice v okviru spremljanja in vrednotenja uporabljajo informacije, ki so na voljo.
For instance, the results of the Mid-Term Evaluations were taken into account in programme amendments. 
Na primer, rezultati vmesnih vrednotenj so se upoštevali pri spremembah programov.
VII. (b) The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
VII. (b) Komisija sprejme to priporočilo.
A large number of Mid-Term Evaluations findings related to preparation for the ex-post evaluation, and actions have already been undertaken at Member States level. 
Veliko število ugotovitev vmesnih vrednotenj je bilo povezanih s pripravo na naknadno vrednotenje, na ravni držav članic pa so se že začeli izvajati ukrepi.
VII. (c) The proposals for the 2014-2020 Monitoring and Evaluation system incorporate a number of changes compared to the CMEF. 
VII. (c) Predlogi za sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja za obdobje 2014–2020 vključujejo več sprememb v primerjavi s skupnim okvirom spremljanja in vrednotenja.
Instead of a Mid-Term Evaluation, there will be enhanced Annual Implementation Reports (AIR) in 2017 and 2019, which will incorporate evaluation findings. 
Namesto vmesnega vrednotenja se bodo leta 2017 in 2019 sestavila izboljšana letna poročila o izvajanju, ki bodo vključevala ugotovitve vrednotenja.
Member States will be required to carry out evaluation activities throughout the programming period in accordance with the Evaluation Plan included as part of the Rural Development Programmes. 
Države članice bodo morale izvajati vrednotenja skozi celotno programsko obdobje v skladu z načrtom vrednotenja, ki je vključen kot del programov razvoja podeželja.
Thus, assessment and reporting on the results and impacts of the policy will be linked more appropriately to the stage of implementation of the Rural Development Programmes. 
Ocena in poročanje o rezultatih in vplivih politike bosta zato bolj primerno povezana s stopnjo izvajanja programov razvoja podeželja.
VII. (d) For the 2014-2020 period, the Commission and Member States are elaborating a monitoring and evaluation framework for the Common Agricultural Policy as a whole, including the monitoring and evaluation framework for the Rural Development Programmes. 
VII. (d) Komisija in države članice za obdobje 2014–2020 oblikujejo okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja za skupno kmetijsko politiko kot celoto, vključno z okvirom spremljanja in vrednotenja za programe razvoja podeželja.
In this context, a number of compulsory common indicators have been defined, with a requirement for additional indicators where needed to address programme specificities. The common indicators will also provide the basis to link the Rural Development policy to the broader 20/20 Strategy. 
V tem okviru je bilo opredeljenih več obveznih skupnih kazalnikov z zahtevo za dodatne kazalnike, kjer so potrebni, za obravnavo programskih specifičnosti. Skupni kazalniki bodo tudi zagotovili podlago za povezavo politike razvoja podeželja s širšo strategijo 20-20.
Special Report No 12/2013 – Can the Commission and Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent? 46 For the 2014-2020 period, quantified target indicators are foreseen for each of the Focus Areas. 
12/2013 – Ali lahko Komisija in države članice dokažejo, da so bila proračunska sredstva EU, dodeljena za politiko razvoja podeželja, dobro porabljena? 46 Za obdobje 2014–2020 se za vsako od področij, na katera se je treba osredotočiti, predvidevajo kazalniki za količinsko opredeljene ciljne vrednosti.
Annual reporting in the Annual Implementation Reports is required for each of these. 
Za vsakega od teh se zahteva letno poročanje v letnih poročilih o izvajanju.
For some Focus Areas, the target indicator is set at output level. 
Za nekatera področja, na katera se je treba osredotočiti, se kazalnik za ciljne vrednosti določi na ravni izložka.
However, where the relevant result indicator is more complex and not suitable for use as a target monitored annually, its value will be assessed through evaluation, and reported in the 2017, 2019 and ex post reports. 
Vendar pa bo v primerih, ko je ustrezen kazalnik rezultatov bolj zapleten in neprimeren za uporabo kot letno spremljana ciljna vrednost, njegova vrednost obravnavana prek vrednotenja in poročana v poročilih leta 2017, 2019 in pozneje.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION INTRODUCTION 2. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE UVOD 2.
The CMEF is not the only means to supervise the implementation of the budget. 
Skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja ni edino sredstvo za nadzor izvrševanja proračuna.
For instance, the Commission carries out audit missions to check the correct implementation of the rural development policy. 
Na primer, Komisija opravlja revizije za preverjanje pravilnega izvajanja politike razvoja podeželja.
Follow-up of these audits might include financial corrections. 
Nadaljnje spremljanje po teh revizijah lahko vključuje finančne popravke.
Monitoring and evaluation not only provide information on the degree of effectiveness or efficiency of a policy, but also on the reasons for this. 
Spremljanje in vrednotenje posredujeta informacije o stopnji učinkovitosti ali uspešnosti politike, pa tudi o razlogih zanjo.
This allows for an adaptation of the policy implementation or a redesign of the policy if needed. 
To omogoča prilagoditev izvajanja politike ali preoblikovanje politike, če je potrebno.
For the 2007 programming period, the CMEF was a new feature. 
Za programsko obdobje 2007 je bil skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja nova značilnost.
It is evident that for Member-States, some of them relatively new to the EU or with a very limited evaluation culture, there is a learning curve, both regarding the methodology of data collection, processing and the use of the evaluation results. 
Očitno je, da se pri državah članicah, med katerimi so nekatere relativno nove v EU ali imajo zelo omejeno kulturo vrednotenja, pojavlja krivulja učenja tako glede metodologije zbiranja in obdelave podatkov kot glede uporabe rezultatov vrednotenja.
The CMEF constitutes a significant improvement compared to the monitoring and evaluation of previous programming periods. 
Skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja predstavlja znatno izboljšanje v primerjavi s spremljanjem in vrednotenjem prejšnjih programskih obdobij.
Both methods and definitions have improved since 2010, although in particular (annual) monitoring of result indicators has remained a difficult task for Managing Authorities. 
Obe metodi in opredelitvi sta se izboljšali od leta 2010, čeprav je zlasti (letno) spremljanje kazalnikov rezultatov ostalo težka naloga za organe za upravljanje.
See also the Commission’s replies to Table 1 under Table 1 bis in the Commission’s reply section. 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na tabelo 1 pod tabelo 1 bis v oddelku odgovor Komisije.
Please note that those replies were published together with the Court’s reports referred to in Table 1. 
Prosimo, upoštevajte, da so bili ti odgovori objavljeni skupaj s poročili Sodišča iz tabele 1.
As a consequence, those replies reflect the situation at the moment of the audit and have not been updated. 
Ti odgovori posledično izražajo razmere v času revizije in niso bili posodobljeni.
For the 2014-2020 period, the Commission and the Member States are putting in place a monitoring and evaluation system for the Common Agricultural Policy as a whole. 
V obdobju 2014–2020 bodo Komisija in države članice uporabljale sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja za skupno kmetijsko politiko kot celoto.
This system takes into account lessons learned from the past. 
Ta sistem upošteva izkušnje iz preteklosti.
However, inevitably every monitoring and evaluation system has a number of constraints, such as data availability, the cost of measurement, time needed for result/ impact of a policy measure to become visible or conflicting demands, such as the wish for administrative burden reduction. 
Vendar pa se pri vsakem sistemu spremljanja in vrednotenja neizogibno pojavlja več omejitev, kot so dostopnost podatkov, strošek meritev, čas, potreben, da rezultat/vpliv ukrepa politike postane viden, ali nasprotnih zahtev, kot je želja po zmanjšanju upravnega bremena.
For this reason, to the maximum possible, the new monitoring and evaluation system is based on existing data sources as well as monitoring data generated during policy implementation. 
Zaradi tega novi sistem spremljanja in vrednotenja, kolikor je mogoče, temelji na obstoječih virih podatkov in podatkih spremljanja, ki so se zbrali med izvajanjem politike.
Special Report No 12/2013 – Can the Commission and Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent? 47 OBSERVATIONS Common reply to paragraphs 19 and 20 The Financial Regulation imposes the use of SMART objectives at the level of activity. 
12/2013 – Ali lahko Komisija in države članice dokažejo, da so bila proračunska sredstva EU, dodeljena za politiko razvoja podeželja, dobro porabljena? 47 OPAŽANJA Skupni odgovor na odstavka 19 in 20 Finančna uredba nalaga uporabo ciljev SMART na ravni dejavnosti.
Activity Based Budgeting 04 (i.e. rural development expenditure) is implemented at the level of the rural development programmes which are composed of a set of measures, which can contribute to several objectives. 
Oblikovanje proračuna po dejavnostih 04 (npr. odhodki za razvoj podeželja) se izvaja na ravni programov razvoja podeželja, ki so sestavljeni iz niza ukrepov, ki lahko prispevajo h kar nekaj ciljem.
Thus, the overall objectives are set out at the programme level and their achievements are measured at that level (see also Commission replies to paragraphs 22 to 25). 
Splošni cilji se zato določijo na ravni programa, na navedeni ravni pa se tudi merijo njihovi dosežki (glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke 22 do 25).
SMART objectives should allow a judgement of whether they have been reached, not necessarily a quantified target. 
Cilji SMART bi morali omogočati presojo, ali so bili doseženi, in ne nujno količinsko opredeljene ciljne vrednosti.
In the recitals of the regulation the rationale for each measure is given. 
V uvodnih izjavah uredbe so podane obrazložitve za vsak ukrep.
At the level of an individual measure the outputs of the measure should be specific and verifiable. 
Na ravni posameznega ukrepa bi morali biti rezultati ukrepa specifični in preverljivi.
To achieve the objectives at programme level usually a combination of measures will be needed, organised in an axis structure for the 2007-2013 programming period. 
Za dosego ciljev na ravni programa je navadno potrebna kombinacija ukrepov, organiziranih v strukturo osi za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
The objectives at EU level are formulated in qualitative terms and specify the direction in which policy should shift competitiveness and diversification. 
Cilji na ravni EU so oblikovani z vidika kakovosti in podrobno določajo smer, v katero bi morala politika usmeriti konkurenčnost in diverzifikacijo.
The Commission considers that it has to be prudent when setting quantified targets in relation to objectives which are affected by many external factors (e.g. the economic climate). 
Komisija meni, da mora biti preudarna pri določanju količinsko opredeljenih ciljnih vrednosti v zvezi s cilji, na katere vplivajo mnogi zunanji dejavniki (npr. gospodarske razmere).
The Commission considers that its proposals for the 2014-2020 Regulations include a clear hierarchy of objectives and sets targets at EU level (EU 2020) and Member States should set quantified targets consistent with this at RDP level for each focus area. 
Komisija meni, da njeni predlogi za uredbe za obdobje 2014–2020 vključujejo jasno hierarhijo ciljev, in določa ciljne vrednosti na ravni EU (EU 2020), države članice pa bi morale za vsako področje, na katero se je treba osredotočiti, v skladu s tem določiti količinsko opredeljene ciljne vrednosti na ravni programa razvoja podeželja.
The architecture established by Regulation 1698/2005 is based on a coherent toolkit designed to address the three Rural Development objectives. 
1698/2005, temelji na skladnem kompletu orodij, oblikovanem za obravnavo treh ciljev razvoja podeželja.
This toolkit took duly into account the available information on the effectiveness and efficiency of the individual measures. 
Ta komplet orodij je ustrezno upošteval informacije, ki so na voljo, o uspešnosti in učinkovitosti posameznih ukrepov.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Common reply to paragraphs 26 and 27 The CMEF was introduced for the first time for 2007-2013 programming period. 
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE Skupni odgovor na odstavke 26 in 27 Skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja je bil prvič predstavljen za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
Its purpose is to back up the programme objectives by setting targets for outputs, results and impacts. 
Njegov namen je podpora ciljev programa prek določanja ciljnih vrednosti za izložke, rezultate in vplive.
Where Rural Development Programmes were adopted with an incomplete set of targets there was a commitment from the Member States side to complete them. 
Kjer so bili programi razvoja podeželja sprejeti z nedokončanim sklopom ciljnih vrednosti, je bila pri državah članicah prisotna odločenost, da ga dokončajo.
The Commission, together with Member States undertook an exercise in 2008 and 2009 to fill in gaps in Rural Development Programmes. 
Komisija se je skupaj z državami članicami leta 2008 in 2009 namenila zapolniti vrzeli v programih razvoja podeželja.
For each Rural Development Programme, the Commission services have pointed out the missing targets and the targets not adequately quantified and invited Managing Authorities to improve their set of targets. 
Za vsak program razvoja podeželja so službe Komisije izpostavile manjkajoče ciljne vrednosti in ciljne vrednosti, ki niso bile zadostno količinsko opredeljene, organe za upravljanje pa so pozvale, naj izboljšajo sklop ciljnih vrednosti.
It is the task of the evaluation, which uses among other sources the monitoring data, to ascertain if a certain programme has contributed to, or improved, promoted a given goal and hence if the objectives have been met. 
Vrednotenje, ki med drugimi viri uporablja tudi podatke o spremljanju, ima nalogo, da preveri, ali je določen program prispeval k danemu cilju, ga izboljšal ali podpiral in ali so se posledično dosegli cilji.
Evaluating complex policy instruments is challenging, and methodology and its application is continually improving to allow better demonstration of policy achievements. 
Vrednotenje zapletenih instrumentov politike je zahtevno, metodologija in njena uporaba pa se neprestano izboljšu-jeta, kar omogoča boljšo predstavitev dosežkov politike.
As a consequence, those replies reflect the situation at the moment of the audit and have not been updated 28. 
Ti odgovori posledično izražajo razmere v času revizije in niso bili posodobljeni. 28.
For the 2014-2020 period, the Commission and the Member States are elaborating a monitoring and evaluation framework for the Common Agricultural Policy as a whole, including the monitoring and evaluation framework for the Rural Development Programmes. 
Za obdobje 2014–2020 Komisija in države članice oblikujejo okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja za skupno kmetijsko politiko kot celoto, vključno z okvirom spremljanja in vrednotenja za programe razvoja podeželja.
In this context, a number of compulsory common indicators have been defined, with a requirement for additional indicators where needed to address programme specificities. Special Report No 12/2013 – Can the Commission and Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent? 
V tem okviru je bilo opredeljenih več obveznih skupnih kazalnikov z zahtevo za dodatne kazalnike, kjer so potrebni, za obravnavo programskih specifičnosti. Posebno poročilo št. 12/2013 – Ali lahko Komisija in države članice dokažejo, da so bila proračunska sredstva EU, dodeljena za politiko razvoja podeželja, dobro porabljena?
48 The common indicators will also provide the basis to link the Rural Development policy to the broader 20/20 Strategy. 
48 Skupni kazalniki bodo tudi zagotovili podlago za povezavo politike razvoja podeželja s širšo strategijo 20-20.
First bullet This was especially true in the beginning of the programming period but in many cases, the target values were complemented later on. 
Prva alinea To je zlasti držalo na začetku programskega obdobja, a v mnogih primerih so bile ciljne vrednosti pozneje dopolnjene.
Second bullet In the Commission’s view, a target can be both: a quantified objective and an estimate of expected results. 
Druga alinea Z vidika Komisije je ciljna vrednost lahko oboje: količinsko opredeljen cilj in ocena pričakovanih rezultatov.
Third bullet A number of common indicators will never be sufficient to capture all situations. 
Tretja alinea Več skupnih kazalnikov nikoli ne bo zadostovalo za pokritje vseh stanj.
The legal framework offers scope for Managing Authorities to define programme-specific indicators where necessary. 
Pravni okvir ponuja organom za upravljanje področje za opredelitev kazalnikov za posamezne programe, kjer je to potrebno.
See replies to paragraphs 26 and 27. 
Glej odgovora na odstavka 26 in 27.
The Rural Development Programmes of Austria subsequently provided output and result indicator targets for the agri-environment measures such as: number of holdings supported; supported area; number of contracts; cultivated area contributing to biodiversity, water quality, climate change, soil quality, prevention of marginalisation. 
Avstrijski programi razvoja podeželja so naknadno zagotovili ciljne vrednosti kazalnikov izložkov in rezultatov za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe, kot so število gospodarstev, ki so prejela pomoč, podprto območje, število pogodb in obdelana površina, ki prispeva k biotski raznovrstnosti, kakovosti vode, spremembam podnebja, kakovosti tal in preprečitvi marginalizacije.
Based on the strategy, the allocation of the budget reflects the priorities among the needs identified by the Member States. 
Na podlagi strategije dodelitev proračuna kaže prednostne naloge med potrebami, ki so jih določile države članice.
The CMEF was introduced for the first time for 2007-2013 programming period. 
Skupni okvir spremljanja in vrednotenja je bil prvič predstavljen za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
The legislation requires that only indicative (non-binding) targets are set beforehand. 
Zakonodaja zahteva predhodno določitev le za okvirne (nezavezujoče) ciljne vrednosti.