natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Lithuania, EU support for upgrading a thermal power plant led to an expected capacity compensation of 1 045 MW becoming available as replacement capacity, as was foreseen in Protocol 4 to the Accession Treaty. 
V Litvi je pomoč EU za posodobitev termoelektrarne vodila v pričakovano nadomestitev zmogljivosti 1 045 MW, ki je postala razpoložljiva kot nadomestna zmogljivost, kakor je bilo predvideno v Protokolu 4 k Pristopni pogodbi.
Special Report No 16/2011 – EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and Future Challenges 42 Box 2 For Kozloduy, the EBRD's assessment indicated that around 31 % of production capacity lost would be compensated. 
16/2011 – Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi 42 Okvir 2 Za Kozloduj je ocena EBRD pokazala, da bi se nadomestilo okrog 31 % proizvodne zmogljivosti.
The Commission considers that there was a strong link between the contribution to the HUDA and the closure of Ignalina nuclear power plant. 
Komisija meni, da obstaja močna povezava med prispevkom v Agencijo za stanovanja in razvoj mest (HUDA) in zaprtjem jedrske elektrarne Ignalina.
Despite the absence of systems to assess progress against overall programme objectives, monitoring and reporting on programme achievements takes place. 
Kljub odsotnosti sistemov za ocenjevanje napredka glede na cilje skupnega programa se izvajata spremljanje in poročanje o dosežkih programa.
Joint reply to 33 and 34. 
Skupni odgovor 33 in 34.
The Commission’s 2011 report (COM 2011/ 432) and the accompanying staff working document (SEC 2011/914) provide details of the achievements. 
Poročilo Komisije iz leta 2011 (COM(2011) 432) in priloženi delovni dokument služb (SEC(2011) 914) zagotavljata podrobnosti o dosežkih.
The Commission considers that it has always been clear that it has overall responsibility for the EU funds contributing to the programmes. 
Komisija meni, da je bilo vedno jasno, da ima splošno odgovornost za sredstva EU, ki se prispevajo za programe.
Nevertheless, the general framework provided by the Accession Treaties has been progressively complemented by a clear procedural framework2 for implementing the EU financial support. 
Kljub temu je splošni okvir, predviden v pristopnih pogodbah, postopno dopolnjeval jasen postopkovni okvir2 za izvajanje finančne pomoči EU.
This is supported by the EBRD fund rules, the operating agreement between the EC and the CPMA, as well as the annual Contribution Agreements with both implementing bodies. 
Tega podpirajo pravila EBRD o upravljanju sklada, operativni dogovor med Komisijo in Centralno agencijo za vodenje projektov (CPMA), pa tudi letni sporazumi o prispevku z izvedbenimi organi.
This framework now clearly defines the roles and responsibilities of the involved parties and defines detailed requirements for monitoring and reporting. 
Ta okvir zdaj jasno opredeljuje vloge in odgovornosti vključenih strani in opredeljuje podrobne zahteve za spremljanje in poročanje.
The Commission will also propose further strengthening this framework in its forthcoming proposals to extend the funds. 
Komisija bo predlagala tudi nadaljnjo krepitev tega okvira v prihodnjih predlogih za razširitev skladov.
The Commission considers that it had sufficient information on which to base its decisions, including information that went beyond formal evaluations and reporting. 
Komisija meni, da ima dovolj informacij, na podlagi katerih lahko sprejme odločitve, vključno z informacijami, ki presegajo formalne ocene in poročanje.
It has also gone beyond supervision of budgetary execution, considering whether the overall objectives have been achieved. 
Prav tako se ni omejila na nadzor proračunskega izvrševanja in je proučevala tudi, ali so bili doseženi skupni cilji.
2 RevisedCommissionDecisionofproceduresof2010andannual Commission Decision on financing. 
2 RevidiranisklepKomisijeopostopkihizleta2010inletnisklep Komisije o financiranju.
Technically the link to the closure is clear: installing 400/110 kV transformers was necessary to relieve the 220kV grid following the Bohunice V1 shut down. 
Tehnično je povezava z zaprtjem jasna: po zaustavitvi Bohunice V1 je bila za sprostitev 220 kV omrežja potrebna vgradnja 400/110 kV transformatorjev.
This project was 44 % co-financed with Slovak resources. 
Ta projekt se je sofinanciral s slovaškimi sredstvi v višini 44 %.
As far as the production capacity is concerned, the Commission considers that 44 % will be compensated for Lithuania and 31 % for Bulgaria. 
Komisija glede zadevnih proizvodnih zmogljivosti meni, da bo za Litvo nadomeščenih 44 % zmogljivosti in za Bolgarijo 31 %.
The Commission considers that the mitigation measures were prioritised by each of the Member States in accordance with their national energy strategy. 
Komisija meni, da so bili ukrepi za blaženje posledic v vsaki državi članici obravnavani prednostno v skladu z njeno nacionalno energetsko strategijo.
The Commission considers that it did ensure the translation of the broad priorities of the Accession Treaties into a coherent set of projects. 
Komisija meni, da je poskrbela za preoblikovanje široko opredeljenih prednostnih nalog iz pristopnih pogodb v skladen niz projektov.
The annual Combined Programming Document breaks the broad priorities down into well-defined individual objectives for the use of the EU financial support. 
Letni kombinirani programski dokument raz-členjuje prednostne naloge v dobro opredeljene posamezne cilje za uporabo finančne pomoči EU.
Based on a proposal from the beneficiary Member State these objectives are then discussed in the Member States’ Management Committee. 
Na podlagi predloga, ki ga izrazi država članica upravičenka, se o teh ciljih potem razpravlja v upravljalnem odboru držav članic.
They then become an integral part of the annual Commission Decision on financing and provide the basis for the elaboration of detailed, individual projects with clearly identified milestones and deliverables. Special Report No 16/2011 – EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and Future Challenges 
Nato postanejo sestavni del letnih sklepov Komisije o financiranju in pomenijo podlago za izdelavo podrobnih posameznih projektov z jasno opredeljenimi mejniki in končnimi rezultati. Posebno poročilo št. 16/2011 – Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi
Following the last agreed reactor closure in each country, there is increasing sense of ownership by the Member States concerned. 
Potem ko je bilo v vsaki državi dogovorjeno zaprtje zadnjih reaktorjev, se je v zadevnih državah članicah povečal občutek lastništva.
Progress is measured and resources have been used effectively. 
Napredek je izmerjen in sredstva so bila učinkovito uporabljena.
There is clear evidence of progress in decommissioning and in mitigating the consequences (achieve-ments were assessed, see also reply to paragraph 27) of reactor closure. 38. 
Obstajajo jasni dokazi o napredku pri razgradnji in blaženju posledic zaprtja reaktorjev (dosežki so bili ocenjeni, glej tudi odgovor iz točke 27).
Second indent It is important to take into account that these personnel costs also covered safe maintenance of the shut down reactor units. 
38., druga alinea Pomembno je upoštevati, da so ti stroški osebja zajemali tudi varno vzdrževanje zaustavljenih reaktorskih enot.
For nuclear safety and licensing reasons, the organisational changes, which are the clear responsibility of the nuclear power plant operators and not the primary objective of the EU financing programmes, can only start once the last reactor unit has been shut down. 
Zaradi jedrske varnosti in izdajanja dovoljenj se lahko organizacijske spremembe, ki so nedvomno v pristojnosti upravljavcev jedrskih elektrarn in niso glavni cilj programov financiranja EU, začnejo šele potem, ko bo zaustavljena zadnja reaktorska enota.
For example, in Lithuania this reorganisation could not start before 2010 and in Slovakia this reorganisation could only become effective once the decommissioning licence had been obtained in July 2011. 
Na primer v Litvi se ta reorganizacija ni mogla začeti pred letom 2010 in na Slovaškem je lahko začela veljati šele julija 2011, ko je bilo pridobljeno dovoljenje za razgradnjo.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE ZAKLJUČKI IN PRIPOROČILA 40.
Without the EU financial assistance the three Member States would not have met their closure commitments and refrained from reopening them under sometimes intense political pressure, particularly during the severe gas supply crisis in early 2009. 
Zadevne tri države članice brez finančne pomoči EU ne bi izpolnile svojih zavez o zaprtju in se pod občasno izrazitim političnim pritiskom ne bi odrekle ponovnemu odprtju, zlasti med hudo krizo oskrbe s plinom na začetku leta 2009.
In addition the assistance provided for major replacement capacity that contributed to the fact that the closure did not result in any electricity blackouts. 
Poleg tega je pomoč zagotovila glavno nadomestno zmogljivost, kar je prispevalo k dejstvu, da zaprtje ni povzročilo nikakršnih izpadov električne energije.
The Commission considers that the needs still to be met are sufficiently clear given that there are revised decommissioning plans in place for all three sites. 
Komisija meni, da so potrebe, ki jih je treba še izpolniti, dovolj jasne, glede na to da so za vse tri lokacije pripravljeni načrti za razgradnjo.
In addition, it is also clear that no further support for mitigation measures will be required post 2013 as the replacement capacity will have been put in place, energy efficiency measures implemented and the restructuring of the network successfully completed. 
Poleg tega je jasno, da po letu 2013 ne bo potrebna nadaljnja podpora ukrepom za blažitev posledic, saj bo uvedena nadomestna zmogljivost, izvedeni bodo ukrepi za energetsko učinkovitost in uspešno bo dokončano prestrukturiranje omrežja.
Within the framework provided by the Accession Treaties, the policy framework for nuclear decommissioning was intentionally flexible, in order to allow EU support to be adjusted to the Member State beneficiary’s needs. 
V okviru, predvidenem s pristopnimi pogodbami, je bil okvir politike za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn namenoma prožen, da bi bilo mogoče pomoč EU prilagoditi potrebam države članice upravičenke.
In accordance with the Accession Treaties and subsequent Council Regulations the Commission has put in place a procedural framework that sets specific objectives, defines roles and responsibilities and clearly defines the reporting and supervision requirements. 
V skladu s pristopnimi pogodbami in poznejšimi uredbami Sveta je Komisija uvedla postopkovni okvir, ki določa posebne cilje, opredeljuje vloge in odgovornosti ter jasno opredeljuje zahteve glede poročanja in nadzora.
The Commission’s supervision focuses on achieving the programme objectives, as well as on budgetary execution and project implementation. 
Nadzor Komisije se osredotoča na doseganje ciljev programa, pa tudi na proračunsko izvrševanje in izvajanje projektov.
It has a clear picture of the achievement of the programmes’ objectives and the status of the decommissioning programmes in all three Member States. 
Komisija ima jasno predstavo o doseganju ciljev programov in o izvajanju programov razgradnje v vseh treh državah članicah.
Special Report No 16/2011 – EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and Future Challenges 
Posebno poročilo št. 16/2011 – Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi
44 In addition, waste flow plans exist and the required radioactive waste processing and storage technologies and facilities are being identified, designed, constructed or have been finished. 
44 Poleg tega obstajajo načrti tokov odpadkov, hkrati pa se določajo, načrtujejo in gradijo tehnologije in obrati, potrebni za predelavo in skladiščenje radioaktivnih odpadkov, ali pa so že dokončani.
The ultimate responsibility for decommissioning and its financing lies with the Member State in which the nuclear power plant is situated. 
Končno odgovornost za razgradnjo in njeno financiranje imajo države članice, v katerih so jedrske elektrarne.
Nevertheless, acknowledging the historical circumstances further EU financial contribution for the period 2014–20 is currently under discussion in the Council and European Parliament following the Commission’s recent Communication ‘A budget for Europe 2020’. 
Kljub temu so ob priznavanju zgodovinskih okoliščin zdaj v Svetu in Evropskem parlamentu v teku razprave o nadaljnjem finančnem prispevku EU za obdobje 2014–2020, ki sledijo nedavnemu sporočilu Komisije „Proračun za Evropo 2020“.
Recommendation (a) - First indent A needs assessment will be part of the proposals to extend financial EU support for decommissioning beyond 2013. 
Priporočilo (a) - prva alinea Ocena potreb bo del predlogov za podaljšanje finančne pomoči EU za razgradnjo po letu 2013.
This takes the form of an impact assessment. 
Ta ocena velja kot ocena učinka.
Recommendation (a) - Second indent The Commission has operated within the legal and procedural framework for an effective, efficient and economic use of EU Funds as described under III(a). 
Priporočilo (a) - druga alinea Komisija znotraj pravnega in postopkovnega okvira ukrepa za uspešno, učinkovito in gospodarno porabo sredstev EU, kot je opisano v točki III(a).
It will continue to work within this framework until the end of 2013 but is further developing it for the next multiannual financial framework. 
Še naprej bo delala znotraj tega okvira do konca leta 2013, hkrati pa ga bo razvijala za naslednji večletni finančni okvir.
The proposal to extend EU financial support for decommissioning beyond 2013 will be accompanied by an Impact Assessment. 
Predlogu za nadaljevanje finančne pomoči EU za razgradnjo po letu 2013 bo priložena ocena učinka.
The Commission will review its performance indicators so that they can be in place for the period after 2013. 
Komisija bo pregledala svoje kazalnike uspešnosti, da bodo lahko uvedeni v obdobju po letu 2013.
Recommendation (b) The Commission will implement this recommendation, through its proposals for EU assistance beyond 2013, which will be accompanied by an impact assessment. 
Priporočilo (b) Komisija bo uresničila priporočilo s predlogi za pomoč EU po letu 2013, ki jim bo priložena ocena učinka.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION ANNEX III Bohunice Audited project 1 The Commission considers that the decommissioning strategy report has been finalised and will use it as a basis for further detailing waste flows and paths. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE PRILOGA III Revidirani projekt Bohunice 1 Komisija meni, da je poročilo o strategiji razgradnje dokončno in ga bo uporabila kot podlago za nadaljnjo podrobno določitev tokov in poti odpadkov.
Furthermore, the licence holder obtained the decommissioning licence for phase 1 as planned in July 2011. 
Poleg tega je imetnik dovoljenja julija 2011 pridobil dovoljenje za 1. fazo razgradnje, kot je bilo načrtovano.
With the decommissioning licence, a new organisational structure became operational. 
Z dovoljenjem za razgradnjo je začela veljati nova organizacijska struktura.
Bohunice Audited project 2 The Commission considers that this project is a direct consequence of the closure of V1 and, in addition, provides back-up steam and heat for all the Bohunice facilities. 
Revidirani projekt Bohunice 2 Komisija meni, da je ta projekt neposredna posledica zaprtja enote V1 in poleg tega zagotavlja rezervno paro in vročino za vse objekte jedrske elektrarne Bohunice.
Bohunice Audited project 3 The baskets had been produced to compensate for those previously used for spent fuel removal from Bohunice V1 unit. 
Revidirani projekt Bohunice 3 Izdelane so bile košare, ki bodo nadomestile košare, predhodno uporabljene za odstranitev izrabljenega goriva iz enote Bohunice V1.
Bohunice Audited project 5 The licence holder obtained the decommissioning licence for phase 1 as planned in July 2011. 
Revidirani projekt Bohunice 5 Imetnik dovoljenja je julija 2011 pridobil dovoljenje za 1. fazo razgradnje, kot je bilo načrtovano.
Weaknesses in the past were related to the transition period. 
Pomanjkljivosti v preteklosti so bile povezane s prehodnim obdobjem.
Ignalina Audited project 6 Nuclear safety is ensured by INPP staff that perform safe maintenance. 
Revidirani projekt Ignalina 6 Jedrsko varnost zagotavlja osebje JE Ignalina, ki opravlja varno vzdrževanje.
The delay just extends the period of safe maintenance and does not impact upon nuclear safety. 
Zamuda samo podaljšuje obdobje varnega vzdrževanja in nima vpliva na jedrsko varnost.
Ignalina Audited project 7 The delays are being addressed. 
Revidirani projekt Ignalina 7 Zamude se obravnavajo.
As the beneficiary for this project was INPP, the PMU function was assured by the DPMU to avoid creating an additional PMU at Ignalina. 
Ker je bila upravičenka pri tem projektu JE Ignalina, je funkcijo enote za vodenje projekta zagotovila enota za vodenje projekta razgradnje (DPMU), da bi se izognili dodatni enoti v Ignalini.
45 Ignalina Audited project 9 The Commission considers that externalisation was based on the fact that the Ignalina NPP Unit only had limited capabilities to perform the necessary investigations and studies. 
45 Revidirani projekt Ignalina 9 Komisija meni, da je zunanje izvajanje temeljilo na dejstvu, da je imela enota JE Ignalina zgolj omejene zmogljivosti za izvedbo potrebnih raziskav in študij.
Ignalina Audited project 10 The Commission considers that it was important to bring in external expertise for the general project management and procurement as this expertise was lacking amongst the INPP staff. 
Revidirani projekt Ignalina 10 Komisija meni, da je bilo zunanje strokovno znanje pomembno za splošno vodenje projekta in javna naročila, ker osebje JE Ignalina ni imelo tega znanja.
Ignalina Audited project 12 The Commission considers that separating the design of the landfill from its construction serves to define scope and costs which will be incurred at the (more expensive) second state more closely and thereby gives a sounder basis for entering into a construction contract. 
Revidirani projekt Ignalina 12 Komisija meni, da je načrtovanje odlagališča odpadkov treba ločiti od gradnje tega odlagališča, kar izboljša opredelitev področja uporabe in stroškov, ki bodo nastali v drugi (dražji) fazi, in s tem daje boljšo podlago za sklenitev pogodbe o gradbenih delih.
Kozloduy Audited project 13 The Commission considers that it was important to bring in external expertise for the general project management and procurement as this expertise was lacking amongst the KNPP staff. 
Revidirani projekt Kozloduj 13 Komisija meni, da je bilo zagotovljeno zunanje strokovno znanje pomembno za splošno vodenje projekta in javna naročila, ker osebje JE Kozloduj ni imelo tega znanja.
Regarding the reliability of cost estimates, identification of decommissioning activities, and absence of RAW inventories see Commission replies to paragraph 20. 
V zvezi z zanesljivostjo ocene stroškov, določitvijo dejavnosti razgradnje in odsotnostjo popisa radioaktivnih odpadkov glej odgovore Komisije na odstavek 20.
Kozloduy Audited project 14 The delays can be explained by the need to more than double the capacity of the facility. 
Revidirani projekt Kozloduj 14 Zamude je mogoče pojasniti s potrebo po več kot podvojeni zmogljivosti objekta.
Kozloduy Audited project 15 Such a risk needs to be addressed. 
Revidirani projekt Kozloduj 15 Tako tveganje je treba obravnavati.
Kozloduy Audited project 16 The Commission considers that since units 3 and 4 are in cold shutdown mode, the recent transfer of units 1 and 2 will provide for such a demarcation. 
Revidirani projekt Kozloduj 16 Komisija meni, da bo glede na to, da sta enoti 3 in 4 v stanju hladne zaustavitve, tako razmejitev pomenil nedavni prenos enot 1 in 2.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION ANNEX IV Bohunice Audited project 1 The Commission considers that there was a clear link as the project was a direct result of the power imbalance resulting from Bohunice V1 shutdown. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE PRILOGA IV Revidirani projekt Bohunice 1 Komisija meni, da je povezava jasna, ker je bil projekt neposredna posledica neravnovesja energije, ki je izhajalo iz zaustavitve Bohunice V1.
It is the economic context that defines the balance between using the LPP or importing electricity. 
Ravnovesje med uporabo te jedrske elektrarne ali uvožene električne energije določajo gospodarske razmere.
Reliable production capacity is required if the economic context changes. 
Če se bodo gospodarske razmere spremenile, bo potrebna zanesljiva proizvodna zmogljivost.
Ignalina Audited project 3 The CPMA continues to recognise the importance of converting the 2nd and 3rd housing areas of Visaginas to a closed-type district heating system. 
Revidirani projekt Ignalina 3 Centralna agencija za vodenje projektov še naprej priznava pomembnost preoblikovanja 2. in 3. stanovanjskega območja v mestu Visaginas v zaprti sistem daljinskega ogrevanja.
Ignalina Audited project 4 The Commission observes that the termination of the project was decided by national authorities following a change of priorities. 
Revidirani projekt Ignalina 4 Komisija ugotavlja, da so se nacionalni organi odločili za prekinitev projekta po spremembi prednostnih nalog.
Kozloduy Audited project 5 BEERECL addresses investments in the private sector. 
Revidirani projekt Kozloduj 5 Z naložbami v zasebnem sektorju se ukvarja Bolgarska kreditna linija za energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije (BEERECL).
In terms of coordination the public authorities (Ministry) is fully involved. 
Javni organi (ministrstvo) v celoti sodelujejo pri usklajevanju.
The EBRD has initiated a gradual phasing out of the incentives provided and increased the eligibility criteria for such projects. 
EBRD je spodbudila postopno ukinjanje predvidenih spodbud in povečala merila upravičenosti za take projekte.
Kozloduy Audited project 6 Bulgaria joined the EU in 2007 and hence it was only from then that it had access to the full range of EU funds. 
Revidirani projekt Kozloduj 6 Bolgarija se je pridružila EU leta 2007 in ima zato šele od takrat dostop do celotnega obsega sredstev EU.
At the time of planning and implementation of the project (2004–05) the situation was very different. 
V obdobju načrtovanja in izvajanja projekta (2004–2005) so bile razmere povsem drugačne.
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 16/2011 EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and future challenges Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2011 — 45 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-443-3 doi:10.2865/47608 
Evropsko računsko sodišče Posebno poročilo št. 16/2011 Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2011 – 45 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-458-7 doi: 10.2865/51710
IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EU ACCESSION NEGOTIATIONS, BULGARIA, LITHUANIA AND SLOVAKIA COMMITTED TO THE EARLY CLOSURE AND DECOMMISSIONING OF EIGHT NUCLEAR REACTORS, THUS FACING A SIGNIFICANT PRODUCTION CAPACITY LOSS. 
BOLGARIJA, LITVA IN SLOVAŠKA SO SE V OKVIRU SVOJIH POGAJANJ O PRISTOPU K EU ZAVEZALE K PREDČASNEMU ZAPRTJU IN RAZGRADNJI OSMIH JEDRSKIH REAKTORJEV, KAR PREDSTAVLJA IZGUBO PRECEJŠNJEGA DELEŽA PROIZVODNE ZMOGLJIVOSTI.
THE COURT ASSESSED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EU FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (2 850 MILLION EURO UP TO NOW) IN SUPPORTING RECIPIENT COUNTRIES’ EFFORTS TO DECOMMISSION THEIR CLOSED NUCLEAR REACTORS AND TO ADDRESS THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE EARLY CLOSURE. 
SODIŠČE JE OCENILO, KAKO USPEŠNO JE FINANČNA POMOČ EU (DOSLEJ 2 850 MILIJONOV EUR) PODPRLA PRIZADEVANJA DRŽAV PREJEMNIC ZA RAZGRADNJO NJIHOVIH ZAUSTAVLJENIH JEDRSKIH REAKTORJEV IN BLAŽENJE POSLEDIC PREDČASNEGA ZAPRTJA.