natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This can never be done by simply looking at an indicator set, but needs to be carefully analysed in an evaluation. 
Tega ni mogoče storiti le z obravnavanjem določenega kazalnika, ampak je potreba skrbna analiza v okviru vrednotenja.
The Commission intends to launch an evaluation on generational renewal at the end of 2017; it needs to also be noted that the support under Pillar 1 was only introduced in 2015. 
Komisija namerava začeti vrednotenje generacijske pomladitve ob koncu leta 2017; opozoriti je treba tudi, da je bila podpora v okviru 1. stebra uvedena šele leta 2015.
Support provided to young farmers under Pillar 2 contributes in several ways to the economic viability of their holdings. 
Podpora, ki se mladim kmetom zagotavlja v okviru 2. stebra, na več načinov prispeva k sposobnosti preživetja njihovega kmetijskega gospodarstva.
See Commission's reply to paragraph 61. 
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 61.
83. (b) The Commission considers that the target indicator represents a reasonable proxy for the specific objective of the focus area for which it is defined: "facilitating the entry of adequately skilled farmers into the agricultural sector and, in particular, generational renewal". 
83. (b)Komisija meni, da je kazalnik ciljnih vrednosti razumen približek specifičnemu cilju prednostnega področja, za katero je opredeljen: „zagotavljanje lažjega začetka opravljanja kmetijske dejavnosti ustrezno usposobljenim kmetom, zlasti pa generacijske pomladitve“.
For this reason, the indicators are linked to specific (result indicators) and general (impact indicators) objectives. 
Zato so kazalniki povezani s specifičnimi (kazalniki rezultatov) in splošnimi (kazalniki učinka) cilji.
The assessment of broad outcomes of supported measures (e.g. viability of the holdings, generation renewal, job creation, increase in educational and innovation level of young farmers, etc.) is to be 11 placed in the context of evaluation, for which the CMEF indicators provide only a supportive function. 
Oceno širših izidov podprtih ukrepov (npr.sposobnost preživetja kmetijskih gospodarstev, generacijsko pomladitev, ustvarjanje delovnih mest, zvišanje ravni izobrazbe in povečanje števila inovacij pri mladih kmetih itd.) je treba umestiti v okvir vrednotenja, kazalniki skupnega okvira spremljanja in vrednotenja pa temu okviru zagotavljajo le podporno funkcijo.
See Commission's replies to paragraphs 70-82. 
Glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 70 do 82.
Young farmers can benefit from a wide range of other instruments under the CAP (see Commission's reply to paragraph 6). 
Mladi kmetje lahko izkoristijo številne druge instrumente v okviru SKP (glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 6).
The overall support to Young Farmers in Pillar 1 consists of the top-up payment and the amounts of different layers of Pillar 1 support received by young farmers. 
zneske različnih slojev podpore v okviru 1. stebra, ki jih prejmejo mladi kmetje.
It is this combination of different layers that is modulating the income support according to certain needs and in line with implementation choices made by the Member States. 
S to kombinacijo različnih slojev se dohodkovna podpora prilagodi glede na opredeljene potrebe in v skladu z odločitvami držav članic pri izvajanju.
Under direct payments, the Young Farmer Payment aims at granting young farmers newly set up an enhanced income support (compared to other farmers) in the form of a "top-up" to the basic payment. 
V okviru neposrednih plačil je namen plačil za mlade kmete novoustanovljenim mladim kmetom dodeliti večjo dohodkovno podporo (v primerjavi z drugimi kmeti) v obliki „dodatka“ k osnovnemu plačilu.
See Commission's replies to paragraphs V, 6, 17, 19 and 20. 
Glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke V, 6, 17, 19 in 20.
Under rural development expected results have to be defined and quantified by the Member States through target indicators. 
V okviru razvoja podeželja morajo države članice pričakovane rezultate določiti in količinsko opredeliti s kazalniki ciljnih vrednosti.
The objective of the support is defined, in particular in Article 5(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 "...facilitating the entry of adequately skilled famers into the agricultural sector and, in particular, generational renewal." 
Cilj podpore je opredeljen, zlasti v členu5(2)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, kot „[...] zagotavljanj[e] lažjega začetka opravljanja kmetijske dejavnosti ustrezno usposobljenim kmetom, zlasti pa generacijske pomladitve“.
The assessment of the impact of the support is a matter of evaluation. 
Ocena učinka podpore je stvar vrednotenja.
88. (a) While generation renewal is a policy priority and important efforts are made to this end, in itself it is not a stand-alone general objective of the CAP in the established intervention logic. 
88. (a)Generacijska pomladitev je prednostna naloga politike in v ta namen potekajo velika prizadevanja, vendar sama po sebi ni samostojni splošni cilj SKP v opredeljeni intervencijski logiki.
The types of support of Pillar 1 and of Pillar 2 are complementary by design and do not need extensive coordination by Member States, especially as they can be cumulative. 
Vrste podpore v okviru 1. in 2. stebra se po zasnovi dopolnjujejo, državam članicam pa jih ni treba obsežno usklajevati, zlasti ker so lahko kumulativne.
See also Commission's replies to paragraphs V and to points 19-33. (b) The Young Farmer Payment is a top-up to the basic payment targeting newly established young farmers and provided as part of the overall system of decoupled area-based direct payments. 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavek V in odstavke od 19 do 33. (b) Plačila za mlade kmete so dodatek k osnovnemu plačilu, ki je usmerjeno v novoustanovljene mlade kmete in se zagotavlja v okviru splošnega sistema nevezanih neposrednih plačil na površino.
See also Commission's replies to paragraphs 39-51 and to paragraph 85. (c) For rural development, coordination exists also between the support for setting-up and other rural development measures (beyond investments), such as knowledge transfer and advisory services. 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 39 do 51 in odstavek 85. (c)Kar zadeva razvoj podeželja, so usklajeni tudi podpora za vzpostavitev kmetijskega gospodarstva in drugi ukrepi za razvoj podeželja (razen naložb), kot so prenos znanja in službe za svetovanje.
Recommendation 1 – Improve the intervention logic by reinforcing needs assessment and defining SMART objectives The Commission partially accepts this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 1 – Izboljšanje intervencijske logike s poudarjanjem pomena ocen potreb in opredelitvijo ciljev v skladu z načeli SMART Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo.
Whilst the Commission welcomes the recommendation, notably as regards those elements of it that clearly fall directly under the Commission's responsibilities, it is not in a position at this stage to make specific commitments in relation to legislative proposals for the post 2020 period. 
Medtem ko Komisija pozdravlja priporočilo, zlasti glede tistih elementov, ki jasno neposredno spadajo v njeno pristojnost, pa v tej fazi ne more sprejeti posebnih zavez glede zakonodajnih predlogov za obdobje po letu 2020.
The Commission will analyse and consider possible relevant policy instruments for the support to young farmers and their logic of intervention in the context of the preparation of future legislative proposals. 
Morebitne ustrezne instrumente politike za podporo mladim kmetom in njihovo intervencijsko logiko bo analizirala in preučila v okviru priprave prihodnjih zakonodajnih predlogov.
The Commission will continue to carry out relevant studies and investigations at the level of the EU, about which needs could be addressed by EU policy instruments and will continue to promote best practices through networking activities. 
Še naprej bo na ravni EU izvajala ustrezne študije in preiskave o tem, katere potrebe je mogoče obravnavati z instrumenti politik EU, in nadalje spodbujala dobre prakse prek dejavnosti mreženja.
The Commission will also reflect about the definition of SMART objectives as regards any possible future Union support to young farmers and of an appropriate performance framework. 
Razmislila bo tudi o opredelitvi ciljev v skladu z načeli SMART v zvezi z morebitno prihodnjo podporo Unije mladim kmetom in o ustreznem okviru uspešnosti.
However, giving the diversity of conditions and territorial realities throughout the EU, the Commission cannot replace Member States as regards the detailed assessment of specific young farmers' needs, the choice and articulation in the use of instruments available at national or EU level and the quantification of expected results from the support provided. 
Vendar Komisija zaradi raznolikosti pogojev in območij v EU ne more nadomestiti držav članic pri podrobni oceni posebnih potreb mladih kmetov, izbiri in uskladitvi uporabe instrumentov, ki so na voljo na nacionalni ravni ali ravniEU, in količinski opredelitvi pričakovanih rezultatov zagotovljene podpore.
89. (a) See also Commission's replies to paragraphs 19, 24(c) and 43-45. 
(a) Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavke 19, 24(c) in od 43 do 45.
As regards joint control, non-compliances in the way Member States have implemented the EU legislation may indeed result in the aid being provided to holdings in which young farmers only have a minor role in terms of decision making power. 
Kar zadeva skupni nadzor, se lahko zaradi neskladnosti pri izvajanju zakonodaje EU v državah članicah pomoč dejansko zagotovi kmetijskim gospodarstvom, v katerih imajo mladi kmetje le manjšo vlogo glede pristojnosti odločanja.
The Commission has provided guidance to Member States on implementing the notion of long-term and effective control and has incorporated this aspect in the clearance of accounts procedure. (b) The Commission services, in its advisory capacity, recommended all managing authorities to: a) distribute more homogenously the available resources in 2014-2020; b) open several calls along the whole programming period; c) set selection criteria ambitious enough to target the best beneficiaries in terms of quality and needs. 
Komisija je državam članicam zagotovila smernice o izvajanju pojma dolgotrajnega in učinkovitega nadzora ter je ta vidik vključila v postopek potrditve obračunov. (b) Službe Komisije so v svoji svetovalni vlogi vsem organom upravljanja priporočile, naj (a) v obdobju2014–2020 enotneje razporedijo razpoložljiva sredstva, (b)objavijo več razpisov v celotnem programskem obdobju in (c) določijo merila za izbor, ki so dovolj zahtevna, da se bodo izbrali najboljši upravičenci, kar zadeva kakovost in potrebe.
Recommendation 2 – Improve the targeting of the measures This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Priporočilo 2 – Izboljšanje ciljne usmerjenosti ukrepov To priporočilo je naslovljeno na države članice.
With regard to Pillar 1, the Commission takes note of the need for clearer criteria in the case of joint control of legal holdings, but underlines that: - assessing the role of young farmers in legal persons is interlinked with important aspects at national level, in particular national company law that vary widely across the EU; - young farmers often work and gradually take control over joint holdings with elder farmers; - and that farm diversification is an important aspect of the CAP. 
Kar zadeva 1. steber, se je Komisija seznanila s potrebo po jasnejših merilih v primeru skupnega nadzora kmetijskih gospodarstev, vendar poudarja, da: – je ocenjevanje vloge mladih kmetov v pravnih osebah povezano s pomembnimi vidiki na nacionalni ravni, zlasti z nacionalnim pravom družb, ki se po EU zelo razlikuje; – mladi kmetje pogosto delajo in postopno prevzamejo nadzor nad kmetijskimi gospodarstvi, ki jih imajo skupaj s starejšimi kmeti; – je diverzifikacija kmetij pomemben vidik SKP.
With regard to Pillar 2, the Commission is of the opinion that the different elements of this recommendation (applying clear selection criteria – also in case of joint setting-up, applying minimum thresholds, and require business plans) are already under the scope of the current legal framework. 
Kar zadeva 2. steber, Komisija meni, da so različni elementi tega priporočila (uporaba jasnih meril za izbor – tudi pri skupni vzpostavitvi kmetijskega gospodarstva, uporaba spodnje meje zbranih točk in zahtevanje poslovnih načrtov) že vključeni v obseg veljavnega pravnega okvira.
The Commission in its advisory role will continue to encourage the Member States to improve the quality of the required business plan and more generally, the selection process. 
Komisija bo v svoji svetovalni vlogi države članice še naprej spodbujala k izboljšanju kakovosti zahtevanega poslovnega načrta in splošneje postopka izbire.
90. (a) The CMEF defines a set of indicators to be provided by the Member States for measuring the CAP performance by objective as laid down in Article 110 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, not by individual measure. 
90. (a) Skupni okvir za spremljanje in vrednotenje določa sklop kazalnikov, ki jih morajo države članice zagotoviti za merjenje uspešnosti SKP glede na cilje iz člena110 Uredbe(EU) št.
See also Commission's replies to paragraphs 70-71. (b) The Commission considers that the target indicator represents a reasonable proxy for the specific objective of the focus area for which it is defined: "facilitating the entry of adequately skilled farmers into the agricultural sector and, in particular, generational renewal". 
Glej tudi odgovore Komisije na odstavka 70 in 71. (b)Komisija meni, da je kazalnik ciljnih vrednosti razumen približek specifičnemu cilju prednostnega področja, za katero je opredeljen: „zagotavljanje lažjega začetka opravljanja kmetijske dejavnosti ustrezno usposobljenim kmetom, zlasti pa generacijske pomladitve“.
The assessment of broad outcomes of supported measures (e.g. viability of the holdings, generation renewal, job creation, increase in educational and innovation level of young farmers, etc.) is to be placed in the context of evaluation, for which the indicators as defined in the CMEF are only one element. 
Oceno širših izidov podprtih ukrepov (npr.sposobnost preživetja kmetijskih gospodarstev, generacijsko pomladitev, ustvarjanje delovnih mest, zvišanje ravni izobrazbe in povečanje števila inovacij pri mladih kmetih itd.) je treba umestiti v okvir vrednotenja, kazalniki, kot so opredeljeni v skupnem okviru spremljanja in vrednotenja, pa so le en njegov element.
See Commission's replies to paragraphs 70-83. 
Glej odgovore Komisije na odstavke od 70 do 83.
Recommendation 3 – Improve the monitoring and evaluation system The Commission partially accepts this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 3 – Izboljšanje sistema za spremljanje in vrednotenje 13
Whilst the Commission welcomes the recommendation, notably as regards those elements of it that clearly fall directly under the Commission's responsibilities, it is not in a position at this stage to make specific commitments in relation to legislative proposals for the post 2020 period. 
Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo. Medtem ko Komisija pozdravlja priporočilo, zlasti glede tistih elementov, ki jasno neposredno spadajo v njeno pristojnost, pa v tej fazi ne more sprejeti posebnih zavez glede zakonodajnih predlogov za obdobje po letu 2020.
However, the following precise replies can be put forward: - First bullet point: While the Commission is strongly committed to improve the performance framework for the CAP post 2020, the concrete way to achieve this improvement will depend on the overall new policy setting. 
Vendar je mogoče navesti naslednje natančne odgovore: – prva alinea: Komisija je trdno zavezana izboljšanju okvira uspešnosti za SKP po letu 2020, kako konkretno se bo to izboljšanje doseglo, pa bo odvisno od splošne vzpostavitve nove politike.
However, also such a monitoring and evaluation system needs to be proportionate and provide value for money. 
Vendar mora biti tudi tak sistem za spremljanje in vrednotenje sorazmeren in zagotavljati ustrezno razmerje med kakovostjo in ceno.
In this context, inevitably a balance will need to be found between scope and depth of the monitoring and evaluation system and related costs and burdens. 
Glede na to bo treba nedvomno najti ravnovesje med obsegom in intenzivnostjo sistema za spremljanje in vrednotenje ter povezanimi stroški in bremeni.
For this reason, the indicators are linked to specific (result indicators) and general (impact indicators) objectives. - Second bullet: The Commission takes note that this recommendation is addressed to Member States. 
Zato so kazalniki povezani s specifičnimi (kazalniki rezultatov) in splošnimi (kazalniki učinka) cilji; – druga alinea: Komisija je seznanjena, da je to priporočilo naslovljeno na države članice.
The Commission will monitor progress in implementing actions and tools related to generational renewal. - Third bullet point: The Commission is committed to keep high standards as regards evaluations carried out at the level of the Union. 
Spremljala bo napredek pri izvajanju ukrepov in orodij, povezanih z generacijsko pomladitvijo; – tretja alinea: Komisija je zavezana ohranjanju visokih standardov pri vrednotenjih, ki se izvedejo na ravni Unije.
However, a balance needs to be found between what can be done through monitoring and evaluation taking into account the risk of excessive administrative burden. 
Vendar je treba najti ravnovesje med tem, kaj je mogoče storiti s spremljanjem in vrednotenjem, ob upoštevanju tveganja prevelikega upravnega bremena.
While the Commission will continue to promote exchange of best practices on indicators and drawing on lessons learnt, the possibility to concretely integrate programme specific indicators into the common indicators system will have to be considered on case by case, and will depend on the possibility to apply those indicators at the level of the Union. 
Komisija bo še naprej spodbujala izmenjavo dobrih praks o kazalnikih in upoštevala pridobljene izkušnje, vendar bo treba možnost, da se kazalniki za posamezne programe konkretno vključijo v skupni sistem kazalnikov, preučiti za vsak primer posebej in bo odvisna od možnosti, da se navedeni kazalniki uporabijo na ravni Unije.
As regards "generational renewal", its assessment at EU level should take into account the effects of several measures, not only the one on setting-up of young farmers. 
Kar zadeva „generacijsko pomladitev“, bi bilo treba pri njeni oceni na ravni EU upoštevati učinke več ukrepov, ne le ukrepa za vzpostavitev kmetijskih gospodarstev mladih kmetov.
The Commission has announced in the DG AGRI studies and evaluation plan the launch of an evaluation on generational renewal by the end of 2017. 14 
Komisija je v študijah GD AGRI in načrtu vrednotenja napovedala začetek vrednotenja generacijske pomladitve do konca leta 2017. 14
Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 16.3.2016 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 30.3.2017 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 31.5.2017 Commission’s (or other auditee’s) official replies received in all languages 28.6.2017 
Dogodek Datum Sprejetje revizijskega memoranduma / začetek revizije 16.3.2016 Osnutek poročila uradno poslan Komisiji (ali drugemu revidirancu) 30.3.2017 Sprejetje končnega poročila po razčiščevalnem postopku 31.5.2017 Prejeti uradni odgovori Komisije (ali drugega revidiranca) v vseh jezikih 28.6.2017
The number of young farmers fell from 3.3 mln in 2005 to 2.3 mln in 2013. 
Število mladih kmetov se je s 3,3 milijona leta 2005 zmanjšalo na 2,3 milijona leta 2013.
The EU allocated 9.6 billion euro to young farmers in 2007-2020 to foster generational renewal in agriculture. 
EU je v obdobju 2007–2020 mladim kmetom dodelila 9,6 milijarde EUR za spodbujanje generacijske pomladitve v kmetijstvu.
The Court found that this aid is often poorly-defined, with no expected result and impact specified. 
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je bila ta pomoč pogosto slabo opredeljena, pričakovani rezultati in učinek pa niso bili podrobno določeni.
For Pillar 1 (direct payments), the aid is provided in a standardized form not matching young farmers’ needs other than additional income. 
V okviru stebra 1 (neposredna plačila) se pomoč dodeljuje v standardizirani obliki in, razen dodatnega dohodka, ni skladna s potrebami kmetov.
For Pillar 2 (rural development), the aid better addresses young farmers’ needs and prompts specific actions (e.g. introducing organic farming, water-or energy-saving initiatives), however the managing authorities did not always apply selection procedures to prioritise the best projects. 
S pomočjo v okviru stebra 2 (razvoj podeželja) se potrebe mladih kmetov bolje obravnavajo, spodbujajo pa se tudi specifični ukrepi (npr. uvedba ekološkega kmetovanja, pobude za varčevanje z vodo ali energijo), vendar organi za upravljanje z izbirnimi postopki niso vedno zagotovili prednosti najboljšim projektom.
The Court recommends to better define the objectives and target the EU support in order to foster effective generational renewal. 
Sodišče priporoča, da bi bilo treba za spodbujanje uspešne generacijske pomladitve bolje opredeliti cilje, podporo EU pa bolje ciljno usmeriti.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors 1977 - 2017 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEMBURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Vprašanja: eca.europa.eu/sl/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Spletišče: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors 1977 - 2017 © Evropska unija, 2017 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
EN 2017 Special Report NO 15 Ex ante conditionalities and performance reserve in Cohesion: innovative but not yet effective instruments (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 1977 - 2017 
SL 2017 Posebno poročilo št. 15 Predhodne pogojenosti in rezerva za smotrnost poslovanja na področju kohezije: inovativna instrumenta, ki pa še nista uspešna (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) 1977 - 2017
Audit team The ECA’s special reports set out the results of its audits of EU policies and programmes or management topics related to specific budgetary areas. 
Revizijska ekipa Posebna poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča predstavljajo rezultate njegovih revizij politik EU in programov ali upravljavskih tem, ki se nanašajo na posamezna področja proračuna.
This performance audit was produced by Audit Chamber II – headed by ECA Member Iliana Ivanova - which specialises in investment for cohesion, growth and inclusion spending areas. 
To revizijo smotrnosti poslovanja je opravil senat II, ki ga vodi članica Evropskega računskega sodišča Iliana Ivanova in ki je specializiran za naložbe v kohezijo, rast in vključevanje.
The audit was led by ECA Member Ladislav Balko, supported by Branislav Urbanič, Head of Private Office; Niels-Erik Brokopp, Principal Manager; Bernard Witkos, Head of Task; Simon Denett, Marija Grguric, Sara Pimentel, Ana Popescu and Anne Poulsen, Auditors. 
Revizijo je vodil član Evropskega računskega sodišča Ladislav Balko, pri njej pa so sodelovali vodja njegovega kabineta Branislav Urbanič, vodilni upravni uslužbenec Niels-Erik Brokopp, vodja naloge Bernard Witkos ter revizorji Simon Denett, Marija Grguric, Sara Pimentel, Ana Popescu in Anne Poulsen.
From left to right: Sara Pimentel, Branislav Urbanič, Ladislav Balko, Niels-Erik Brokopp, Marija Grguric, Simon Dennett, Bernard Witkos. 
Od leve proti desni: Sara Pimentel, Branislav Urbanič, Ladislav Balko, Niels-Erik Brokopp, Marija Grguric, Simon Dennett, Bernard Witkos.
Annex IV - Replies of the Commission Rules applicable to assessing the achievement of milestones and targets 94 - 111 3 
Priloga IV – Pravila, ki se uporabljajo za presojo doseganja mejnikov in ciljnih vrednosti Odgovori Komisije 3