natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Scope of OLAF’s obligation to communicate cases to the Supervisory Committee prior to their transmission to NJAs (paragraph 64) The European Court of Auditors notes that in 2009, the SC was not informed about nine cases which had been transmitted to NJAs. 
Obveznost urada OLAF, da nadzorni odbor obvešča o zadevah, preden jih pošlje nacionalnim sodnim organom (odstavek 64) Evropsko računsko sodišče navaja, da v letu 2009 nadzorni odbor ni bil obveščen o 9 zadevah, ki so bile poslane nacionalnim sodnim organom.
The reason for not informing the SC was that these cases were already being dealt with by the NJAs at the time of transmission of the information by OLAF. 
Razlog za to, da nadzorni organ ni bil obveščen, je bil v tem, da so v času, ko jim je OLAF poslal informacije, nacionalni organi že obravnavali te zadeve.
The SC agrees with the ECA that the obligation to inform the SC of cases transmitted to the NJAs is unconditional and leaves no margin for discretion2. 
Nadzorni organ se strinja z ERS, da je obveznost obveščanja nadzornega odbora o zadevah, ki se pošljejo nacionalnim sodnim organom, brezpogojna in uradu OLAF ne dopušča, da bi o tem odločal po svoji presoji2.
2 See Franchet and Byk judgement, § 170. 
2 Glej sodbo Franchet in Byk, točka 170.
REPLY OF THE OLAF SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE The SC considers that it must be informed of transmission of information to NJAs both in internal and external investigations. 
ODGOVOR NADZORNEGA ODBORA OLAF Nadzorni odbor meni, da mora biti tako pri notranjih kot zunanjih preiskavah obveščen o pošiljanju informacij nacionalnim sodnim organom.
In addition to cases where OLAF transmits information to NJAs in order to initiate judicial proceedings, OLAF shall inform the SC when transmission occurs in cases already pending before the NJAs when cases are opened and investigative action is taken by OLAF. 
Poleg zadev, v zvezi s katerimi urad OLAF pošlje informacije nacionalnim sodnim organom zaradi začetka sodnega postopka, urad OLAF obvesti nadzorni organ tudi, kadar se pošiljajo informacije o zadevah, ki so že v postopku pred nacionalnimi sodnimi organi, kadar preiskave začne in preiskovalne ukrepe sprejme urad OLAF.
This obligation does not apply if OLAF transmits information to national administrative authorities. 
Ta obveznost pa ne velja, kadar urad OLAF pošilja informacije nacionalnim upravnim organom.
The term of office of the Supervisory Committee’s Members (paragraph 65) The Members of the current SC took office on 30 November 2005, on a three year mandate, renewable once. 
Mandat članov nadzornega odbora (odstavek 65) Člani sedanjega nadzornega odbora so bili imenovani 30. novembra 2005 za triletni mandat, ki se lahko enkrat podaljša.
On expiry of their term of office on 29 November 2008, they remained in office, according to Article 11 (4) of Regulation No 1073/1999, since they were not renewed or replaced. 
Ko se jim je mandat 29. novembra 2008 iztekel, so svojo funkcijo opravljali dalje v skladu s členom 11(4) Uredbe št.
The procedure for the renewal of their appointment by common accord of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission was at its final stage at the time this response was drafted. 
Postopek za podaljšanje njihovega imenovanja s soglasno potrditvijo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije je bil v času priprave tega odgovora v zaključni fazi.
The SC agrees with the ECA that the SC must have a formal mandate from all three institutions. The SC regrets the lack of alacrity on the part of the institutions in concluding this matter, since the end of the SC’s first term of office. 
Nadzorni odbor se strinja z ERS, da morajo nadzorni odbor uradno potrditi vse tri institucije, in obžaluje, da institucije od izteka prvega mandata nadzornega odbora niso pokazale večje zavzetosti za rešitev tega vprašanja.
Despite a long period of uncertainty, the SC has continued to fully perform its task of reinforcing OLAF’s independence by regular monitoring of the implementation of the investigative function. 
Kljub dolgemu obdobju negotovosti je nadzorni odbor še naprej v celoti opravljal svojo nalogo krepitve neodvisnosti urada OLAF z rednim spremljanjem izvajanja njegove preiskovalne funkcije.
Special Report No 2/2011 — Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office 
2/2011 – Nadaljnje ukrepanje po Posebnem poročilu št. 1/2005 o upravljanju Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF)
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 2/2011 Follow-up of special report no 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2011 — 58 pp. — 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-115-9 doi:10.2865/7996 
Evropsko računsko sodišče Posebno poročilo št. 2/2011 Nadaljnje ukrepanje po Posebnem poročilu št. 1/2005 o upravljanju Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije 2011 – 58 str. – 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9237-130-2 doi:10.2865/91047
Free publications: How to obtain EU publications • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • at the European Union’s representations or delegations. 
KAKO DO PUBLIKACIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE Brezplačne publikacije: • na spletni strani EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • na predstavništvih ali delegacijah Evropske unije.
Priced subscriptions (e.g. annual series of the Official Journal of the European Union and reports of cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union): • via one of the sales agents of the Publications Office of the European Union (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm). 
Plačljive naročnine (na primer na Uradni list Evropske unije ali zbirke odločb sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije): • pri prodajnih zastopnikih Urada za publikacije Evropske unije (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_sl.htm).
THE EUROPEAN ANTI-FRAUD OFFICE (OLAF) PROVIDES AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION SERVICE IN THE FIGHT AGAINST FRAUD AND OTHER ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES DETRIMENTAL TO THE EU BUDGET. 
„EVROPSKI URAD ZA BOJ PROTI GOLJUFIJAM (OLAF) ZAGOTAVLJA NEODVISNE PREISKAVE/PREISKOVALNE STORITVE V BOJU PROTI GOLJUFIJAM IN DRUGIM NEZAKONITIM DEJAVNOSTIM, KI ŠKODUJEJO PRORAČUNU EU.
IN 2005 OLAF WAS THE SUBJECT OF A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS WHICH MADE A NUMBER OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO MAKE ITS INVESTIGATIVE FUNCTION MORE EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE JE LETA 2005 PRIPRAVILO POSEBNO POROČILO O OLAF, V KATEREM JE PODALO ŠTEVILNA PRIPOROČILA ZA VEČJO UČINKOVITOST IN USPEŠNOST NJEGOVIH PREISKAV.
THIS FOLLOW-UP REPORT EXAMINES WHETHER THE ORIGINAL RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED AND RECOMMENDS FURTHER MEASURES WHICH COULD HELP OLAF IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS INVESTIGATIONS. 
V PRIČUJOČEM POROČILU JE PREUČILO, ALI SO BILA TA PRIPOROČILA IZVEDENA, IN PRIPOROČILO DODATNE UKREPE, KI SO LAHKO OLAF V POMOČ PRI IZBOLJŠANJU UČINKOVITOSTI IN USPEŠNOSTI NJEGOVIH PREISKAV.“ EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJ-AB-11-003-SL-C
Special Report No 3 2011 THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF EU CONTRIBUTIONS CHANNELLED THROUGH UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATIONS IN CONFLICT-AFFECTED COUNTRIES (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Posebno poročilo št. 3 2011 UČINKOVItOSt IN USPEŠNOSt PRISPEVKOV EU, USmERjENIh PREK ORgANIzAcIj zDRUžENIh NARODOV V DRžAVAh, KI SO bILE PRIzADEtE V KONfLIKtIh (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU) EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Fax +352 4398-46410 e-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Special Report No 3 2011 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE 12, rue Alcide De gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUKSEmbURg tel. +352 4398-1 faks +352 4398-46410 E-naslov: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Posebno poročilo št.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011 ISBN 978-92-9237-072-5 doi:10.2865/41651 © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2011 ISbN 978-92-9237-085-5 doi:10.2865/52220 © Evropska unija, 2011 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
5 ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY EC: European Commission EU: European Union EuropeAid: Cooperation Office of the European Commission FAFA: Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement between the European Commission and the United Nations SMART: Specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time-based TFEU: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union UN: United Nations UNDP: United Nations Development Programme UNRWA: United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East Effectiveness: Attaining the specific objectives set and achieving the intended results Efficiency: The best relationship between resources employed and results achieved Sustainability: Results are maintained after the EU funding has ended Input: Resources needed to carry out an activity e.g. implementing a project Output: The products, capital goods and services which result from a development intervention; may also include changes resulting from the intervention which are relevant to the achievement of outcomes Outcome: The longer-term impact usually expressed in terms of broad socioeconomic consequences Direct costs: Costs directly attributable to an activity Indirect costs: Costs which are not directly attributable to an activity, like overheads Trust fund: Funding instruments through which donors pool resources Joint management: The implementation of activities through international organisations Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih 5 SEzNAm KRAtIc IN gLOSAR eU: Evropska unija europeaid: Urad za sodelovanje Evropske komisije fafa: Okvirni finančni in upravni sporazum med Evropsko komisijo in združenimi narodi PdeU: Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije UndP: Program združenih narodov za razvoj UnrWa: Agencija združenih narodov za pomoč in zaposlovanje palestinskih beguncev na bližnjem vzhodu zn: združeni narodi deljeno upravljanje: Izvajanje dejavnosti prek mednarodnih organizacij izid: Dolgoročnejši učinek, običajno izražen kot širše socialno-ekonomske posledice izložek: Proizvodi, investicijsko blago in storitve, ki so rezultat razvojne intervencije; vsebujejo lahko tudi spremembe, ki so rezultat intervencije in so relevantne za doseganje izidov neposredni stroški: Stroški, ki jih je mogoče neposredno pripisati dejavnosti Posredni stroški: Stroški, ki jih ni mogoče neposredno pripisati dejavnosti, kot so režijski stroški Skrbniški sklad: financiranje instrumentov, s pomočjo katerih donatorji združujejo sredstva trajnost: Rezultati so ohranjeni, ko se financiranje EU konča Učinkovitost: Najboljše razmerje med uporabljenimi viri in doseženimi rezultati Uspešnost: Doseganje specifičnih zastavljenih ciljev in načrtovanih rezultatov Vložek: Viri, potrebni za izvedbo dejavnosti, npr. za izvedbo projekta Posebno poročilo št.
The European Commission has intensified its cooperation with the United Nations as part of its commitment to the better (a) coordination of aid. The amount of EuropeAid funds channelled through United Nations Organisations increased from 144 million euro in 2001 to 935 million euro in 2009, reaching a peak of over 1 billion in 2006. and focus on activities rather than re-II. 
Evropska komisija je okrepila svoje sodelovanje z združenimi narodi kot del svoje zaveze k boljšemu usklajevanju pomoči. (a) znesek sredstev Urada EuropeAid, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov, se je s 144 milijonov EUR v letu 2001 povečal na 935 milijonov EUR v letu 2009, največji pa je bil leta 2006, ko je znašal več kot milijardo EUR. ii. (b) to je druga faza dvodelne revizije.
The overall audit question was whether the Commission achieves value for money when channelling funds through the United Nations. 
Skupno revizijsko vprašanje je bilo, ali Komisija pri usmerjanju sredstev prek združenih narodov dosega smotrno porabo sredstev.
Part one looked at decision-making and monitoring. (c) It concluded that the process for deciding to implement aid through the UN did not demonstrate that that is the most effective and efficient option and that the monitoring systems should be further improved. 
Prvi del je bil posvečen odločanju in spremlja-(c) nju, njegov zaključek pa je bil, da postopek odločanja o izvajanju pomoči prek zN ni dokazal, da je to najučinkovitejša in najuspešnejša možnost, ter da je treba nadalje izboljšati sisteme za spremljanje.
Special Report No 15/2009 for phase 1 was published in January 2010. 
Posebno poročilo št. 15/2009 o prvi fazi je bilo objavljeno januarja 2010. iii.
The second phase evaluates the achieve-(d) ment of objectives. It complements the first phase by assessing whether EU contributions channelled through United Nations organisations are an effective, efficient and sustainable way of delivering aid in conflict-affected countries. 
V drugi fazi se vrednoti doseganje ciljev. (d) Dopolnjuje prvo fazo z oceno tega, ali so prispevki EU, usmerjeni prek organizacij združenih narodov, uspešen, učinkovit in trajnosten način zagotavljanja pomoči v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih.
The audit examined a sample of projects in Afghanistan, Iraq and Sudan covering the period 2006–08. sults. 
Pri reviziji je bil pregledan vzorec projektov v Afganistanu, Iraku in Sudanu iz obdobja 2006–2008.
Frequent weaknesses in project design were noted which had negative consequences for the implementation and assessment of projects. 
Ugotovljene so bile pogoste slabosti pri načrtovanju projektov, ki so imele negativne posledice za izvajanje in ocenjevanje projektov.
By channelling funds through the UN the Commission has delivered aid in areas which would otherwise have been very difficult to target. 
Komisija je z usmerjanjem sredstev prek zN dostavila pomoč na območja, na katera bi jo bilo sicer zelo težko usmeriti.
Given the high inherent risk in conflict-affected countries, the activities funded had an overall positive impact, with 10 out of 19 projects in the sample achieving all or at least the main objectives. 
Ob upoštevanju visokega tveganja, značilnega za države, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih, so imele financirane dejavnosti na splošno pozitiven učinek in 10 projektov od 19 v vzorcu je doseglo vse cilje ali vsaj glavne cilje.
For the majority of interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq and Sudan the planned implementation period was exceeded, in general due to the unrealistic timeframe set out in the contribution agreements, which underestimated the difficult situation in these countries. 
Pri večini intervencij v Afganistanu, Iraku in Sudanu je bilo načrtovano obdobje izvajanja preseženo, na splošno zaradi nerealističnega časovnega okvira, določenega v sporazumih o prispevku, pri katerem so bile podcenjene težke razmere v teh državah.
A large proportion of reports are still delayed, not detailed enough (e) Given the challenging circumstances in which the projects were implemented, sustainability of results is in general difficult to guarantee. 
Štirje od 19 projektov so bili izvedeni v prvotnem časovnem okviru, pri več projektih pa se je prvotno trajanje več kot podvojilo. (e) glede na zahtevne razmere, v katerih se je izvajalo projekte, je na splošno težko zagotoviti trajnost rezultatov.
However, the majority of the results achieved were assessed as having reasonable chances of sustainability. Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 
Vendar ima večina doseženih rezultatov po oceni razumne možnosti za trajnost. Posebno poročilo št. 3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih
(f ) V. The Commission has not sufficiently focused on efficiency aspects given that the cost assessments carried out were limited and not systematically documented. 
(f ) V. Komisija se ni dovolj posvetila vidikom učinkovitosti, saj so imele ocene stroškov omejen obseg in niso bile sistematično dokumentirane.
In addition, the Court identified shortcomings in this area in almost half (nine out of 19) of the sampled projects while for seven projects sufficient information was not available. 
Poleg tega je Sodišče na tem področju ugotovilo pomanjkljivosti pri skoraj polovici projektov v vzorcu (pri devetih od 19), pri sedmih projektih pa ni bilo na voljo dovolj informacij.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (b) The reporting of the funded activities should be further improved in order to enable the Commission to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the projects financed on a timely basis. 
POVzEtEK (b) Poročanje o financiranih dejavnostih bi bilo treba nadalje izboljšati, da se Komisiji omogoči pravočasno ocenjevanje uspešnosti in učinkovitosti financiranih projektov.
The Commission should follow up all instances where reporting is judged to be unsatisfactory. (c) A systematic assessment of the efficiency of funded projects should be carried out and benchmarks should be developed for standard costs where feasible. 
Komisija bi morala spremljati vse primere, v katerih je poročanje ocenjeno kot nezadovoljivo; (c) Opraviti bi bilo treba sistematično oceno učinkovitosti financiranih projektov in razviti merila uspešnosti za standardne stroške, kjer je to mogoče storiti.
On the basis of its observations, the Court makes the following recommendations to further improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the interventions: (a) The contribution agreements should include objectives which are well adapted to the specific circumstances, quantified indicators to measure the achievement of these objectives, where possible, and a realistic timeframe. MAP SHOWING THE COUNTRIES COVERED BY THIS AUDIT 7 Source: Eurostat. 
Sodišče na podlagi svojih opažanj izreka priporočila za nadaljnje izboljšanje uspešnosti in učinkovitosti intervencij: (a) Sporazumi o prispevku bi morali vsebovati cilje, ki so dobro prilagojeni specifičnim razmeram, količinsko opredeljene kazalnike za merjenje doseganja teh ciljev, kjer je mogoče, in realističen časovni okvir; zemljeVid z držaVami, ki jih je zajela reVizija 7 Vir: Eurostat.
Special Report No 3/2011 — The efficiency and effectiveness of EU contributions channelled through United Nations Organisations in conflict-affected countries 8 INTRODUCTION AUDIT AREA 1. 
3/2011 - Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih 8 UVOD POdrOčje reVizije 1.
Over the last two decades efforts have been made to coordinate and harmonise development cooperation with the objective of further increasing aid effectiveness. This focus on results was most notably reflected in the 2000 millennium development goals. 
V zadnjih dveh desetletjih so potekala prizadevanja za usklajevanje in poenotenje sodelovanja pri razvoju zaradi nadaljnjega povečanja uspešnosti pomoči. ta osredotočenost na rezultate se je odražala predvsem v razvojnih ciljih tisočletja iz leta 2000.
The Commission continued this policy with its commitment in 2005 in the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness as well as in the European Consensus on Development to coordinate aid in close cooperation with international organisations like the United Nations. 
Komisija je nadaljevala to politiko tako, da se je s Pariško deklaracijo o učinkovitosti pomoči iz leta 2005 in Evropskim soglasjem o razvoju zavezala k usklajevanju pomoči v tesnem sodelovanju z mednarodnimi organizacijami, kot so združeni narodi.
3. As a result of the decision to intensify cooperation with the UN, but also due to the major crises in Afghanistan, Iraq and Sudan, Commission aid implemented through UN organisations increased considerably. For the Commission’s EuropeAid Cooperation Office (EuropeAid) alone the funds channelled through the UN rose from 144 million euro in 2001 to 935 million euro in 2009, reaching a peak of over 1 billion euro in 2006 (see Figure 1). 
3. zaradi odločitve o okrepitvi sodelovanja z zN, pa tudi zaradi hudih kriz v Afganistanu, Iraku in Sudanu, se je pomoč Komisije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij zN, močno povečala. že samo sredstva Urada za sodelovanje EuropeAid (EuropeAid) Komisije, ki se usmerjajo prek zN, so se s 144 milijonov EUR v letu 2001 povečala na 935 milijonov EUR v letu 2009 in leta 2006 dosegla celo več 1 milijardo EUR (glej diagram 1). diaGram 1 PriSPeVki Urada eUrOPeaid OrGanizacijam zn V ObdObjU 2001–2009 (V milijOnih eUr) 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Vir: Evropska komisija.
POLICY FRAMEWORK 4. 
OkVir POlitike 4.
The method of implementing the EU budget through international organisations like the UN is called joint management1. 
Način izvrševanja proračuna EU prek mednarodnih organizacij, kot so zN, se imenuje deljeno upravljanje1.
The basic principle of joint management is to delegate certain implementation tasks to international organisations by relying on their control systems. However, the overall responsibility for the management of the budget and for ensuring value for money remains with the Commission2. 
Osnovno načelo deljenega upravljanja je, da se določene naloge izvajanja prenesejo na mednarodne organizacije ob zanašanju na njihove kontrolne sisteme, vendar ima skupno odgovornost za upravljanje proračuna in zagotavljanje smotrnosti porabe še vedno Komisija2.
EU funds channelled through United Nations organisations can be implemented in the following ways: (a) contributions to specific projects either as the only donor or together with other donors; (b) contributions to Multi-Donor Trust Funds3, typically used in crisis (either post-conflict or post-disaster) situations. 
Sredstva EU, ki so usmerjena prek organizacij združenih narodov, je mogoče izvajati na naslednje načine: (a) s prispevki specifičnim projektom kot edini donator ali z drugimi donatorji; (b) s prispevki v večdonatorske skrbniške sklade3, ki se običajno uporabljajo v kriznih razmerah (po konfliktih ali ne-srečah).
The basic idea of trust funds is that donors contribute to the fund without allocating the money to specific activities or objectives (no ‘earmarking’). 
Osnovni namen skrbniških skladov je, da donatorji vanje prispevajo, ne da bi sredstva namenili za določene dejavnosti ali cilje (ni „namenskega financiranja“).
General objectives are then set for the fund as a whole, which might be further specified in objectives for the underlying projects or activities. 
Nato se določijo splošni cilji za sklad kot celoto, ki so lahko podrobneje opredeljeni v ciljih s tem povezanih projektov ali dejavnosti.
About 26 % of the contributions to UN organisations are through Multi-Donor Trust Funds4. 
Približno 26 % prispevkov organizacijam zN se izvede prek večdonatorskih skrbniških skladov4.
Examples are the interventions in Afghanistan and in particular Iraq, where Commission funding has, until recently, almost exclusively been channelled through Multi-Donor Trust Funds; (c) contributions to the general budget of a UN organisation. This specific approach is used for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) in the occupied Palestinian territory. 
Primera sta intervenciji v Afganistanu in zlasti v Iraku, kjer je bilo financiranje Komisije do pred kratkim usmerjeno skoraj izključno prek večdonatorskih skrbniških skladov; (c) s prispevki v splošni proračun katere od organizacij zN. ta specifični pristop se uporablja za Agencijo združenih narodov za pomoč in zaposlovanje palestinskih beguncev na bližnjem vzhodu (UNRWA) na zasedenem palestinskem ozemlju.
The Commission’s annual contribution of 66 million euro represents about a quarter of the UNRWA general budget. 
Letni prispevek Komisije, ki znaša 66 milijonov EUR, predstavlja približno četrtino splošnega proračuna UNRWA.