natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reply of the Commission 56 Conclusions and recommendations 93 Since 2012, the Commission has been address‐ ing the issue of the high error rate by requesting national action plans from the Member States and monitoring their implementation. 
Odgovori Komisije 56 Zaključki in priporočila 93 Komisija od leta 2012 za obravnavanje vprašanja visoke stopnje napake zahteva, da morajo države članice pripraviti nacionalne akcijske načrte, in spremlja njihovo izvajanje.
Based on the experiences gained and recommendations from the Court of Auditors, these action plans have been improved over time. 
Na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj in priporočil Računskega sodišča so se ti akcijski načrti sčasoma izboljšali.
Nevertheless, the first results of the joint efforts of the Commission and the Member States to reduce error rates through the implementation of the action plans can already be seen in a lower error rate for rural development in 2013. 
Kljub temu so že vidni prvi rezultati skupnih prizadevanj Komisije in držav članic za znižanje stopenj napake z izvajanjem akcijskih načrtov, saj je bila stopnja napake na področju razvoja podeželja leta 2013 nižja.
95 — First indent The Commission has also found weaknesses regard‐ ing these issues in its own audits. 
95, prva alinea Tudi Komisija je pri svojih revizijah odkrila slabosti v zvezi s temi vprašanji.
Substantial finan‐ cial corrections have already been made in this respect. 
Na tem področju se že izvajajo precejšni finančni popravki.
Public procurement and non‐respect of commit‐ ments are central elements in the action plans for rural development. 
Javno naročanje in neupoštevanje zavez sta glavna elementa v akcijskih načrtih na področju razvoja podeželja.
95 — Second indent The Commission shares this conclusion. 
95, druga alinea Komisija se strinja s tem zaključkom.
Furthermore, the Paying Agencies must com‐ ply with the accreditation criteria laid down in Annex I of Regulation 907/2014 (programme 2014–20) before any payments are made. 
Poleg tega morajo plačilne agencije pred izvedbo plačil zagotoviti skladnost z akreditacijskimi merili iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št.
96 As regards limited incentives for beneficiaries to comply with farming commitments, agri‐environ‐ mental schemes reflect voluntary commitments by farmers to provide environmental benefits and public goods which go beyond the mandatory requirements. 
96 V zvezi z omejenimi spodbudami za upravičence, da upoštevajo kmetijske zaveze, kmetijsko-okoljske sheme odražajo prostovoljne zaveze kmetov, da bodo zagotovili okoljske koristi in javne dobrine, ki presegajo obvezne zahteve.
Reply of the Commission 57 As regards the sanctions, the Commission considers that while sanctions for non‐compliance have to be proportionate they shall remain a dissuasive tool. 
Odgovori Komisije 57 V zvezi s sankcijami Komisija meni, da morajo biti sankcije za neskladnost sorazmerne in da morajo ostati odvračilne.
97 The establishment of the action plans was con‐ ceived as a preventive process based on SWD (2013) 244, built on the self‐assessment of the Member States of the root causes that had an impact on the error rates. 
97 Izvajanje akcijskih načrtov je bilo zasnovano kot preventivni proces na podlagi dokumenta SWD(2013) 244, temelji pa na samooceni temeljnih vzrokov, ki so vplivali na stopnje napake, ki jo izvedejo države članice.
This process has progressively incorpo‐ rated the reactive perspective, systematically taking into account the audit findings and proposing specific corrective actions. 
V ta proces se je postopoma vključeval odzivni vidik, sistematično so se upoštevale revizijske ugotovitve in predlagali posebni popravljalni ukrepi.
The double perspective (preventive and reactive) is still part of the exer‐ cise. 
Dvojni vidik (preventivni in odzivni) je še vedno del tega procesa.
The last update of the action plans shows that almost 50 % of the actions were triggered by con‐ crete audit findings of the Court or the Commission, whilst the other half were based on self‐assessment of the Member States. 
Pri zadnji posodobitvi akcijskih načrtov je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je skoraj 50 % ukrepov začelo izvajati zaradi konkretnih revizijskih ugotovitev Sodišča ali Komisije, preostala polovica ukrepov pa je temeljila na samooceni držav članic.
Recommendation 1 The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Priporočilo 1 Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
This will be dealt with through the European Network for Rural Development and the seminars. 
To se bo obravnavalo prek Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja in na seminarjih.
Intentional circumvention of rules is part of the Anti‐fraud strat‐ egy and the seminars organised thereof in several Member States. 
Namerno izogibanje pravilom je del strategije za preprečevanje goljufij in zadevnih seminarjev, ki bodo organizirani v več državah članicah.
Recommendation 1 — Public procurement The recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Priporočilo 1 – Javno naročanje To priporočilo je naslovljeno na države članice.
Nevertheless the Commission would like to under‐ line that for the 2014–20 period, it has already presented guidance for practitioners on the avoid‐ ance of common errors in European Structural and Investment Funds projects. 
Kljub temu Komisija poudarja, da je za obdobje 2014–2020 že predstavila smernice za strokovne delavce za preprečevanje pogostih napak pri projektih evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov.
These guidelines were presented to managing authorities and paying agencies in the Seminar on Error Rate that took place in October 2014. 
Te smernice so bile organom upravljanja in plačilnim agencijam predstavljene na seminarju o stopnji napake, ki je potekal oktobra 2014.
Recommendation 1 — Intentional circumvention of rules The Commission agrees with the recommendation which is addressed to the Member States. 
Priporočilo 1 – Namerno zaobhajanje pravil Komisija se strinja s priporočilom, ki je naslovljeno na države članice.
Recommendation 1 — Agri‐environment payments The Commission agrees with the recommendation which is addressed to the Member States and would like to underline that during its conformity audits it systematically verifies whether administrative checks could be carried out in addition to the on‐ the‐spot ones. 
Priporočilo 1 – Kmetijsko‐okoljska plačila Komisija se strinja s priporočilom, ki je naslovljeno na države članice, in poudarja, da med revizijami skladnosti sistematično preverja, ali bi se lahko poleg pregledov na kraju samem opravili tudi administrativni pregledi.
If that is the case, recommendations to the Member States are issued to increase the scope of administrative checks and financial correc‐ tions are applied. 
V tem primeru se izdajo priporočila državam članicam, naj povečajo obseg administrativnih pregledov, in naložijo finančni popravki.
Moreover, the legal framework for 2014–20 CAP contains provisions requiring the Member States to ensure that all the rural development measures to be implemented are verifiable and controllable. 
Poleg tega pravni okvir za SKP za obdobje 2014– 2020 vsebuje določbe, v skladu s katerimi morajo države članice zagotoviti, da se lahko vsi ukrepi za razvoj podeželja, ki jih nameravajo izvajati, preverijo in kontrolirajo.
All RDPs must include an ex ante assessment on the verifiability and controllability of the measures, including Agro‐Environment‐Climate measures, operations and concrete commitments. 
Vsi programi za razvoj podeželja morajo vključevati predhodno oceno preverljivosti in možnosti kontrole ukrepov, vključno s kmetijsko-okoljsko-podnebnimi ukrepi, dejavnostmi in konkretnimi zavezami.
If these controls are not satisfactory, the RDP must be modi‐ fied accordingly (Article 62 R1305/2013). 
Če te kontrole niso zadovoljive, je treba program za razvoj podeželja ustrezno prilagoditi (člen 62 Uredbe (EU) št.
Further‐ more, full reduction of support is foreseen in case of serious non‐compliance with commitments or breach of eligibility criteria as well as exclusion of the beneficiary from receiving support during the year of the finding and the following one. 
Poleg tega sta v primeru resne neskladnosti z zavezami ali kršitve meril za upravičenost predvidena znižanje podpore v celoti ter izključitev upravičenca iz prejemanja podpore v letu ugotovitve in naslednjem letu.
Reply of the Commission 58 As regards the sanctions, the Commission shares the view that while sanctions for non‐compliance have to be proportionate they shall remain a dis‐ suasive tool. 
Odgovori Komisije 58 V zvezi s sankcijami se Komisija strinja, da morajo biti sankcije za neskladnost sorazmerne in da morajo ostati odvračilne.
Recommendation 2 The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Priporočilo 2 Komisija sprejema to priporočilo.
Recommendation 3 The Commission partially accepts the recommenda‐ tion as it cannot prejudge the scope and the result of such analysis or future policy choices by the legislators for the next programming period. 
Priporočilo 3 Komisija delno sprejema to priporočilo, saj ne more posegati v obseg ali rezultate take analize ali prihodnje izbire politike zakonodajalcev za naslednje programsko obdobje.
In 2017 the Commission will prepare a strategic report of the Fund, summarising the annual pro‐ gress reports submitted by Member States (Arti‐ cle 53 Regulation 1303/2013). 
Leta 2017 bo Komisija pripravila strateško poročilo o skladu, v katerem bo povzela letna poročila o napredku, ki jih bodo predložile države članice (člen 53 Uredbe (EU) št.
Recommendation 3 — Last bullet The Commission agrees that administrative checks should be used when possible, although it notes that in most cases this is not feasible for agro‐envi‐ ronment operations. 
Priporočilo 3, zadnja alinea Komisija se strinja, da bi se morali administrativni pregledi uporabljati, kadar je to mogoče, čeprav opozarja, da se večinoma ne morejo izvajati za kmetijsko-okoljske dejavnosti.
The Court estimates that the average error rate for rural development expenditure in the past 3 years was 8,2 %. 
Sodišče ocenjuje, da je povprečna stopnja napake za odhodke na področju razvoja podeželja v zadnjih treh letih znašala 8,2 %.
Member States’ control authorities did not detect the errors as checks are not exhaustive and are based on insufficient information. 
Nadzorni organi držav članic niso odkrili napak, ker pregledi niso izčrpni in ker temeljijo na nezadostnih informacijah.
Some of the main causes of the errors are non-compliance with public procurement rules, suspected intentional infringements by private beneficiaries and non-compliance with farming commitments for area-related aid. 
Med glavnimi vzroki za napake so neskladnost s pravili o javnem naročanju, domnevne namerne kršitve, ki so jih zakrivili zasebni upravičenci, in neskladnost s kmetijskimi zavezami za pomoč na površino.
The Commission and the Member States are only partially effective in addressing the main causes of the high error rate for rural development. 
Komisija in države članice so pri obravnavi glavnih vzrokov za visoko stopnjo napake na področju razvoja podeželja le delno uspešne.
The Court makes a number of specific recommendations for taking corrective and preventive action to address the widespread weaknesses at EU level. 
Sodišče je pripravilo več specifičnih priporočil za sprejetje popravljalnih in preventivnih ukrepov za odpravo zelo razširjenih slabosti na ravni EU.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ‐AB‐14‐024‐EN‐N ISSN 1977‐5679 
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE QJ-AB-14-024-SL-N ISSN 1977-5784
EN 2015 Special Report NO 03 EU Youth Guarantee: first steps taken but implementation risks ahead EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
03 Posebno poročilo SL 2015 Jamstvo EU za mlade: narejeni so bili prvi koraki, vendar se nakazujejo tveganja pri izvajanju EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 Print ISBN 978-92-872-2062-2 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-2008-0 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-2030-1 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/782852 doi:10.2865/243811 doi:10.2865/08292 QJ-AB-15-002-EN-C QJ-AB-15-002-EN-N QJ-AB-15-002-EN-E © European Union, 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2015 Print ISBN 978-92-872-2021-9 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-2075-2 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-2028-8 ISSN 1831-094X ISSN 1977-5784 ISSN 1977-5784 doi:10.2865/673085 doi:10.2865/039472 doi:10.2865/98808 QJ-AB-15-002-SL-C QJ-AB-15-002-SL-N QJ-AB-15-002-SL-E © Evropska unija, 2015 Reprodukcija je dovoljena z navedbo vira.
EN 2015 Special Report NO 03 EU Youth Guarantee: first steps taken but implementation risks ahead (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
št. 03 Posebno poročilo SL 2015 Jamstvo EU za mlade: narejeni so bili prvi koraki, vendar se nakazujejo tveganja pri izvajanju (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 287(4) PDEU)
Audit team The ECA’s special reports set out the results of its performance and compliance audits of specific budgetary areas or management topics. 
Revizijska ekipa V posebnih poročilih Evropskega računskega sodišča so predstavljeni rezultati njegovih revizij smotrnosti poslovanja in skladnosti za posamezna proračunska področja ali teme upravljanja.
The ECA selects and designs these audit tasks to be of maximum impact by considering the risks to performance or compliance, the level of income or spending involved, forthcoming developments and political and public interest. 
Sodišče te revizijske naloge izbere tako, da imajo kar največji učinek, in sicer z upoštevanjem tveganj za smotrnost poslovanja ali skladnost, raven zadevnih prihodkov ali porabe, bližajoče se spremembe ter politični in javni interes.
This performance audit was produced by Audit Chamber II — headed by ECA Member Henri Grethen — which specialises in the structural policies, transport and energy spending areas. 
Ta senat se ukvarja s področji porabe strukturnih politik, prometa in energetike.
The audit was led by ECA Member Iliana Ivanova, sup‐ ported by Tony Murphy, head of private office; Mihail Stefanov, attaché of private office; Emmanuel Rauch, head of unit; Valeria Rota, team leader; Kristina Maksinen, auditor and Paolo Pesce, auditor. 
Revizijo je vodila članica Sodišča Iliana Ivanova, pri tem pa so ji pomagali vodja kabineta Tony Murphy, ataše kabineta Mihail Stefanov, vodja enote Emmanuel Rauch, vodja ekipe Valeria Rota, revizorka Kristina Maksinen in revizor Paolo Pesce.
From left to right: P. Pesce, T. Murphy, I. Ivanova, M. Stefanov, K. Maksinen, E. Rauch. 
Od leve proti desni: P. Pesce, T. Murphy, I. Ivanova, M. Stefanov, K. Maksinen, E. Rauch.
Contents 03 Paragraph I–V 1–23 1–8 9–10 11–13 14–23 24–26 27–84 27–43 29–31 32–35 36–37 38–39 40–43 Abbreviations Glossary Executive summary Introduction Youth unemployment in the EU The EU’s role in employment policy Youth Guarantee: a measure to support young people in finding a job and structural reform to improve school‐to‐work transitions Funding of the Youth Guarantee scheme Audit scope and approach Observations The Commission provided adequate and timely support to the Member States in setting up the Youth Guarantee scheme Commission guidance on designing the Youth Guarantee scheme provided to Member States within 5 months of the Council recommendation The Commission carried out a comprehensive and timely assessment of the draft YGIPs submitted by Member States The Commission’s assessment identified many of the shortcomings in draft YGIPs Not all Member States submitted a revised YGIP following the Commission’s assessment Commission assessment of YGIPs not sufficiently coordinated with its assessment of the ex ante conditionality for ESF/YEI operational programmes 
Kazalo 03 Odstavek I–V 1–23 1–8 9–10 11–13 14–23 24–26 27–84 27–43 29–31 32–35 36–37 38–39 40–43 Kratice Glosar Povzetek Uvod Brezposelnost mladih v EU Vloga EU v politiki zaposlovanja Jamstvo za mlade: ukrep za podporo mladim pri iskanju zaposlitve in strukturno reformo za izboljšanje prehoda iz šolanja v zaposlitev Financiranje programa jamstva za mlade Obseg revizije in revizijski pristop Opažanja Komisija je zagotovila ustrezno in pravočasno podporo državam članicam pri vzpostavljanju programa jamstva za mlade Smernice Komisije o oblikovanju programa jamstva za mlade, zagotovljene državam članicam v petih mesecih od priporočila Sveta Komisija je pripravila celovito in pravočasno oceno osnutkov INJM, ki so jih predložile države članice Komisija je v oceni ugotovila številne pomanjkljivosti v osnutkih INJM Nekatere države članice niso predložile spremenjenega INJM, zatem ko ga je ocenila Komisija Ocena INJM, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, ni dovolj usklajena z njeno oceno predhodnih pogojenosti za operativne programe ESS/PZM
Contents 04 44–84 45–57 58–64 65–84 85–91 The Court identified a number of risks to the effective implementation of the Youth Guarantee scheme Risk that total funding may not be adequate Lack of definition of good quality job offer may hamper the effectiveness of the Youth Guarantee Comprehensive Youth Guarantee monitoring and reporting framework still being developed Conclusions and recommendations Annex I — Annex II — Annex III — Youth unemployment rate (June 2014) Countries eligible for YEI funding Commission assessment of YGIP and YEI ex ante conditionalities Reply of the Commission 
Kazalo 04 44-84 45 – 57 58 – 64 65 – 84 85 – 91 Sodišče je ugotovilo številna tveganja za uspešno izvajanje programa jamstva za mlade Tveganje, da skupno financiranje morda ni zadostno Uspešnosti jamstva za mlade lahko škoduje to, da ni opredelitve kakovostne ponudbe za zaposlitev Celovit okvir za spremljanje in poročanje za jamstvo za mlade je še vedno v razvoju Zaključki in priporočila Priloga I Priloga II Priloga III – Stopnja brezposelnosti mladih (junij 2014) – Države, ki so upravičene do financiranja PZM – Ocena INJM in predhodnih pogojenosti v zvezi s PZM, ki jo je pripravila Komisija Odgovori Komisije
Abbreviations 05 AIR: Annual Implementation Report CPR: Common provisions regulation (Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 
Kratice 05 BDP: bruto domači proizvod CPR: Uredba o skupnih določbah (Uredba (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo, o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
320)). CSRs: Country‐specific recommendations EMCO: Employment Committee ESF: European Social Fund ESIF: European Structural and Investment Funds GDP: Gross domestic product IA: Impact assessment ICT: Information and communication technology ILO: International Labour Organisation NEETs: (Young people) Not in Employment, Education or Training OP: Operational programme PES: Public employment services SWD: Staff working document YAT: Youth Action Team YEI: Youth Employment Initiative YG: Youth Guarantee YGIP: Youth Guarantee Implementation Plan 
1083/2006 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 320)) ESS: Evropski socialni sklad IKT: informacijska in komunikacijska tehnologija INJM: Izvedbeni načrt za jamstvo za mlade MOD: Mednarodna organizacija dela NEET: mladi, ki niso zaposleni, se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo PZM: Pobuda za zaposlovanje mladih SWD: delovni dokument služb Komisije
Glossary 06 European Network of Public Employment Services: The network was established following a Decision by the Council and the European Parliament to maximise the efficiency of public employment services (PES). 
Glosar 06 Evropska mreža javnih služb za zaposlovanje: Mreža je bila vzpostavljena potem, ko je bil sprejet sklep Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta o čim večjem povečanju učinkovitosti javnih služb za zaposlovanje.
The network comprises all 28 EU countries and the European Commission. 
Vanjo je vključenih vseh 28 držav članic EU in Evropska komisija.
It aims to compare PES performance through benchmarking, identify evidence‐based good practices and foster mutual learning, promote the modernisation and strengthening of PES service delivery, including that of the Youth Guarantee, prepare inputs to the European Employment Strategy and the corresponding national labour market policies. 
Njen namen je primerjati uspešnost javnih služb za zaposlovanje z referenčnimi merili, ugotavljati dokazano dobre prakse in spodbujati medsebojno učenje, podpirati posodabljanje in krepitev storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo javne službe za zaposlovanje, vključno z jamstvom za mlade, ter pripravljati prispevke za evropsko strategijo zaposlovanja in ustrezne nacionalne politike trga dela.
European Semester: The European Semester is the first phase of the EU’s annual cycle of economic policy guidance and surveillance. 
Evropski semester: Evropski semester je prva faza letnega cikla EU za usmerjanje in nadzor gospodarskih politik.
Each European Semester, the European Commission analyses the fiscal and structural reform policies of every Member State, provides recommendations, and monitors their implementation. 
Evropska Komisija v vsakem evropskem semestru analizira fiskalno in strukturno politiko reform v vseh državah članicah, zagotovi priporočila in spremlja njihovo izvajanje.
In the second phase of the annual cycle, known as the National Semester, Member States implement the policies they have agreed. 
V drugi fazi letnega cikla, znani kot nacionalni semester, države članice izvajajo politike, ki so jih sprejele.
European Social Fund: The European Social Fund (ESF) aims to strengthen economic and social cohesion within the European Union by improving employment and job opportunities (mainly through training measures), encouraging a high level of employment and the creation of more and better jobs. 
Evropski socialni sklad: Evropski socialni sklad (ESS) je namenjen krepitvi ekonomske in socialne kohezije v Evropski uniji, in sicer z izboljšanjem zaposlovanja in možnosti za zaposlitev (predvsem z ukrepi usposabljanja), spodbujanjem visoke stopnje zaposlenosti ter odpiranjem več in boljših delovnih mest.
International Labour Organisation: The International Labour Organisation (ILO) is a United Nations agency dealing with labour issues, and in particular with international labour standards. 
Mednarodna organizacija dela: Mednarodna organizacija dela (MOD) je agencija Združenih narodov, ki se ukvarja z vprašanji na področju dela in zlasti z mednarodnimi delovnimi standardi.
185 of the 193 UN member states are members of the ILO. 
V Mednarodno organizacijo dela je včlanjenih 185 od 193 držav članic ZN.
Unlike other United Nations specialised agencies, the International Labour Organisation has a tripartite governing structure — representing governments, employers, and workers. 
Za razliko od drugih specializiranih agencij Združenih narodov ima tristransko strukturo upravljanja, ki zajema vlade, delodajalce in delavce.
NEETs: NEETs are defined as young people ‘neither in employment, education or training’. 
NEET: NEET so mladi, ki niso zaposleni, se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo.
This definition was agreed by the Employment Committee (EMCO) in April 2010 for use in the context of the Europe 2020 Integrated Guidelines. 
O tej opredelitvi se je dogovoril Odbor za zaposlovanje aprila 2010 zaradi uporabe v okviru integriranih smernic strategije Evropa 2020.
This definition of NEET includes unemployed people not in education and training and inactive people not in education and training. 
Ta opredelitev NEET zajema brezposelne, ki se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo, in neaktivne, ki se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo.