natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the Member States which joined the EU in 2004 the agricultural area is defined as that part of the ‘utilised agricultural area’ (UAA) which was maintained in ‘good agricultural condition’ (GAC) as at 30 June 20037. The establishment of that date excluded from the benefit of SAPS land which was unutilised at that time, even when farmers took such land back into cultivation in later years. 
Za države članice, ki so se pridružile EU leta 2004, je kmetijska površina opredeljena kot del kmetijskih zemljišč v uporabi (KZU), ki je bila 30. junija 2003 v dobrem kmetijskem stanju (GAC).7 Kmetje zaradi določitve tega datuma za zemljišča, ki takrat niso bila v uporabi, niso mogli izkoristiti SEPP, niti če so jih v kasnejših letih znova kultivirali.
In Bulgaria and Romania, however, no such date limit was established with the result that farmers can benefit from SAPS payments in relation to formerly abandoned land which they take back into cultivation after the accession of these Member States to the EU. 
Za Bolgarijo in Romunijo pa tak rok ni bil določen, zato lahko kmetje prejmejo plačila iz SEPP za prej opuščena zemljišča, ki jih znova kultivirajo po pristopu teh držav k EU.
11. The ‘utilised agricultural area’ is a statistical concept used by Eurostat8. 
11. „Kmetijsko zemljišče v uporabi“ je statistični pojem, ki ga uporablja Eu-rostat8.
It comprises the total area taken up by arable land, permanent grassland, permanent crops and kitchen gardens. 
Obsega skupno površino njiv, trajnega travinja, trajnih nasadov in vrtov.
A comparison between the SAPS and the SPS is set out in Annex I. 5 Article 1(c) and Article 124(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (JO L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 
Primerjava med SEPP in SEP je v Prilogi I. 5 Člen 1(c) in člen 124(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št.
6 Article 124(4) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
16) 6 Člen 124(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
7 Article 124(1) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
7 Člen 124(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
8 This concept is defined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1200/2009 of 30 November 2009 on farm structure surveys (OJ L 329, 15.12.2009, p. 
1200/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o raziskovanjih strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev (UL L 329, 15.12.2009, str.
11 Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States OPTION TO PROVIDE COMPLEMENTARY NATIONAL DIRECT PAYMENTS 13. 
16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah MOŽNOST ZAGOTAVLJANJA DOPOLNILNIH NACIONALNIH NEPOSREDNIH PLAČIL 13.
Before joining the EU, some Member States had already granted direct payments to their farmers which would have been incompatible with the principles of the EU common market. 
Nekatere države članice so pred pridružitvijo EU svojim kmetom že odobrile neposredna plačila, ki bi bila nezdružljiva z načeli skupnega trga EU.
To avoid a possible decrease of the level of support received by farmers after the accession of their country to the EU, the Member States concerned may grant from the national budget complementary direct payments (CNDP), in addition to SAPS aid, in order to offset the gradual phasing-in of EU direct payments9. They have to be approved by the Commission and the total direct support which farmers may be granted must not exceed the level of direct support they would be entitled to in the EU-15. 
Da ne bi po pristopu njihovih držav k EU prišlo do morebitnega znižanja ravni podpore, ki jo prejemajo kmetje, lahko zadevne države članice iz nacionalnega proračuna poleg pomoči iz SEPP dodelijo dopolnilna neposredna plačila kot nadomestilo za postopno uvajanje neposrednih plačil EU.9 To mora odobriti Komisija, skupna neposredna podpora, ki se lahko odobri kmetom, pa ne sme preseči ravni neposredne podpore, do katere bi bili upravičeni v EU-15.
The CDNPs are gradually being phased out to coincide with the annual increase of the SAPS payments. 
Dopolnilna nacionalna neposredna plačila se postopno ukinjajo glede na letno povečanje plačil iz SEPP.
9 Article 132 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
9 Člen 132 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
12 Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 13 AUDIT SCOPE, OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH 14. 
16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah 13 OBSEG IN CILJI REVIZIJE TER REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP 14.
The Court has audited the implementation of the SAPS since the financial year 2005 in the framework of the annual Declaration of Assurance (DAS). 
Sodišče je od proračunskega leta 2005 revidiralo izvajanje SEPP v okviru letne izjave o zanesljivosti (DAS).
These audits were however limited to the legality and regularity of the payments and the functioning of supervisory and control systems. 
Vendar so bile te revizije omejene na zakonitost in pravilnost plačil ter delovanje nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov.
The Court published the results of these audits in its respective Annual Reports. 
Njihove rezultate je objavilo v svojih letnih poročilih.
SAPS is the second largest scheme financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the main source of farmers’ income support in the new Member States. 
SEPP je druga največja shema, ki jo financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS) in glavni vir dohodkovne podpore kmetom v novih državah članicah.
Annual expenditure increased over the years from 1,4 billion euro in the financial year 2005 to around 5 billion euro in 2011. 
Letni odhodki so se povečali z 1,4 milijarde EUR v proračunskem letu 2005 na približno 5 milijard EUR v letu 2011.
The aid is scheduled to reach up to around 7,5 billion euro by the financial year 2014. 
Pomoč naj bi po načrtih do proračunskega leta 2014 znašala do okoli 7,5 milijarde EUR.
The audit was carried out in 2011 and included visits to the European Commission and to five Member States that had introduced the SAPS either in 2004 (Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) or in 2007 (Bulgaria and Romania) as well as documentary analysis and review of studies and evaluations. 
Revizija je bila izvedena leta 2011. Vključevala je obiske v Evropski komisiji in petih državah članicah, ki so uvedle SEPP leta 2004 (Madžarska, Poljska in Slovaška) ali leta 2007 (Bolgarija in Romunija), analizo dokumentacije ter pregled študij in vrednotenj.
In 2011, Member States visited paid some 4 billion euro in SAPS aid which represents some 80 % of the total expenditure made under the scheme in that financial year10. 17. 
Obiskane države članice so leta 2011 izplačale približno 4 milijarde EUR pomoči iz SEPP, kar pomeni približno 80 % skupnih odhodkov iz te sheme v tem proračunskem letu.10 17.
This report focuses on the following: — the implementation of the main elements of the scheme, including the definition of the beneficiaries and the definition of eligible land; — the contribution of the scheme to the objective of supporting farmers’ income in the new Member States; — the preparation of the transition to a new direct payments system common to all EU Member States. 
Poročilo je osredotočeno na: – izvajanje glavnih elementov sheme, vključno z opredelitvijo upravičencev in upravičenih zemljišč; – prispevek sheme k cilju dohodkovne podpore kmetom v novih državah članicah; – pripravo prehoda na nov sistem neposrednih plačil, ki bo skupen vsem državam članicam EU.
10 See Annex II. 
10 Glej Prilogo II.
14 OBSERVATIONS PAYMENTS MADE TO BENEFICIARIES ONLY MARGINALLY INVOLVED IN FARMING 18. As pointed out above, SAPS payments are intended to support the income of farmers11. They are designed to be consistent with the overall objectives of the CAP aiming to ‘increase agricultural productivity’ and ‘thus ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture’12. 
Plačila iz SEPP so, kot že navedeno, namenjena dohodkovni podpori kmetom.11 Shema je zasnovana tako, da je skladna z glavnimi cilji skupne kmetijske politike, ki si prizadeva „povečati kmetijsko produktivnost“ in „s tem zagotoviti primerno življenjsko raven kmetijske skupnosti, zlasti s povečanjem individualnega zaslužka oseb, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom“.12 OPREDELITEV „KMETA“ IN „KMETIJSKE DEJAVNOSTI“ 19.
According to the regulation13 a farmer is defined as a person or group of persons engaged into an ‘agricultural activity’. An ‘agricultural activity’ consists in the ‘production, rearing or growing of agricultural products including harvesting, milking, breeding animals and keeping animals for farming purposes or maintaining the land in good agricultural and environmental condition’. 
V Uredbi13 je kmet opredeljen kot oseba ali združenje oseb, ki oprav-lja(-jo) „kmetijsko dejavnost“. „Kmetijska dejavnost“ pomeni „proizvodnjo, vzrejo ali gojenje kmetijskih proizvodov, vključno z žetvijo, molžo, rejo živali in kmetijsko rejo živali, ali ohranjanje zemljišča v dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih“.
The Court has already observed that the definition of ‘farmers’ as persons or entities having eligible land at their disposal and engaged in an ‘agricultural activity’ lacked precision14. The Court found that Hungary and Romania had further clarified these terms in their respective national legislation. 
Sodišče je že opozorilo na to, da opredelitev„kmetov“ kot oseb ali subjektov, ki imajo na voljo upravičena zemljišča in opravljajo „kmetijsko dejavnost“ ni dovolj natančna.14 Ugotovilo je, da sta Madžarska in Romunija ta pojma dodatno pojasnili v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji.
In Romania the national rules explicitly exclude from SAPS payments persons who only grant a concession for land use or rent out land. 
V Romuniji nacionalna pravila izrecno prepovedujejo plačila iz SEPP osebam, ki samo dajo zemljišča v uporabo koncesionarju ali jih oddajo v najem.
In practice this is however rarely checked and, in both Member States, the Court found that SAPS aid had been paid to landowners who had no own agricultural activity on the land in question while the farmers actually using it had no access to SAPS aid. 
Vendar se to v praksi redko preverja in Sodišče je v obeh državah članicah ugotovilo, da je bila pomoč iz SEPP izplačana lastnikom zemljišč, ki na zadevnih zemljiščih niso izvajali lastne kmetijske dejavnosti, kmetje, ki so zemljišča dejansko uporabljali, pa niso imeli dostopa do pomoči iz SEPP.
11 Article 1(c) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
11 Člen 1(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
12 Article 39 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union: ‘1. 
12 Člen 39 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: „1.
The objectives of the common agricultural policy shall be: (a) to increase agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour; (b) thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture; (c) to stabilise markets; (d) to assure the availability of supplies; (e) to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices. 
Cilji skupne kmetijske politike so: (a) povečati kmetijsko produktivnost s pospeševanjem tehničnega napredka in zagotavljanjem racionalnega razvoja kmetijske proizvodnje ter z optimalno uporabo proizvodnih dejavnikov, zlasti delovne sile; (b) s tem zagotoviti primerno življenjsko raven kmetijske skupnosti, zlasti s povečanjem individualnega zaslužka oseb, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom; (c) stabilizirati trge; (d) zagotoviti redno preskrbo; (e) zagotoviti, da je preskrba potrošnikom dostopna po primernih cenah.
In working out the common agricultural policy and the special methods for its application, account shall be taken of: (a) the particular nature of agricultural activity, which results from the social structure of agriculture and from structural and natural disparities between the various agricultural regions; (b) the need to effect the appropriate adjustments by degrees; (c) the fact that in the Member States agriculture constitutes a sector closely linked with the economy as a whole.’ 
Pri oblikovanju skupne kmetijske politike in posebnih metod za njeno izvajanje se upošteva: (a) posebna narava kmetijske dejavnosti, ki je posledica socialne strukture kmetijstva ter strukturnih in naravnih neskladij med različnimi kmetijskimi regijami; (b) potreba, da se ustrezne prilagoditve izvedejo postopno; (c) dejstvo, da je kmetijstvo v državah članicah sektor, ki je tesno povezan s celotnim gospodarstvom.“ 13 Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št.
14 Special Report No 5/2011. 
14 Posebno poročilo št. 5/2011.
As in the case of the SPS, the Court also identified beneficiaries of SAPS aid who were marginally involved in farming. 
Sodišče je kot pri SEP odkrilo tudi upravičence do pomoči iz SEPP, ki so se s kmetijstvom ukvarjali le kot z obrobno dejavnostjo.
Cases in point include real estate companies, airports (Poland and Romania), forestry enterprises, hunting associations, fishing clubs or ski clubs (Hungary, Poland and Slovakia). 
Značilni primeri so nepremičninske družbe, letališča (Poljska in Romunija), gozdarska podjetja, lovska društva, ribiška društva ali smučarski klubi (Madžarska, Poljska in Slovaška).
The Commission and the Member States visited have neither details of the precise number of such cases nor of their financial impact. 
Komisija in obiskane države članice nimajo niti natančnih podatkov o številu takih primerov niti o njihovem finančnem učinku.
As an illustration of such cases, the Court found that in Poland, for application year 2010, 1 345 hunting associations had legally received SAPS aid for an amount of 2,54 million euro in relation to 19 000 ha of agricultural land. 
Sodišče je na primer ugotovilo, da je v letu oddaje zahtevkov 2010 na Poljskem 1 345 lovskih društev zakonito prejelo 2,54 milijona EUR pomoči iz SEPP za 19 000 ha kmetijskih zemljišč.
Likewise, in Hungary, 337 hunting associations received more than 1 million euro in SAPS aid in relation to 7 000 ha of agricultural land. 
Podobno je na Madžarskem 337 lovskih društev prejelo več kot 1 milijon EUR pomoči iz SEPP za 7 000 ha kmetijskih zemljišč.
The Court also identified, in the Member States visited, a specific group of SAPS beneficiaries consisting of public entities managing land owned by the state under the respective legislations. 
Sodišče je v obiskanih državah članicah odkrilo tudi posebno skupino upravičencev do SEPP, in sicer javne subjekte, ki upravljajo zemljišča v državni lasti v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
In such cases, SAPS payments primarily finance a public function incumbent upon such entities rather than support farmers’ income. 
V takih primerih plačila iz SEPP financirajo predvsem javno funkcijo teh subjektov in niso dohodkovna podpora kmetom.
The 2008 Health Check of the CAP allowed Member States to define criteria excluding beneficiaries such as the ones mentioned above from the benefit of SAPS payments. 
Pregled stanja SKP iz leta 2008 je državam članicam omogočil opredelitev meril, s katerimi bi preprečile, da bi plačila iz SEPP prejemale zgoraj navedene vrste upravičencev.
However, to date none of the Member States visited during the audit has taken advantage of this option and, as a result, the situation described above still prevails. 
Vendar doslej nobena od obiskanih držav članic ni izkoristila te možnosti, zato opisano stanje ostaja nespremenjeno.
LAND USED FOR NON-AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES 24. 
ZEMLJIŠČA, KI SE UPORABLJAJO ZA NEKMETIJSKE DEJAVNOSTI 24.
The provisions which are applicable for the SPS do not permit payments to be made in relation to land which is not predominantly used for agri-culture15. 
Določbe, ki se uporabljajo za SEP, ne dovoljujejo plačil za zemljišča, ki se ne uporabljajo pretežno za kmetijstvo15.
Such rules do not exist for the SAPS. 
Takega pravila za SEPP ni.
In Hungary, the authorities made SAPS payments in relation to permanent grassland owned by the State and dedicated to military training but for which the national authorities could not clarify whether they were exclusively used for training or used even partially for agricultural purposes (grazing sheep). 
Na Madžarskem so organi izplačali plačila iz SEPP za trajno travinje v državni lasti, namenjeno vojaškemu urjenju, za katerega nacionalni organi niso mogli pojasniti, ali se uporablja izključno za urjenje ali vsaj delno v kmetijske namene (paša ovac).
The Court estimated that in 2010 4,25 million euro had been paid in relation to 25 000 ha of military terrains16. 15 Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. 
Sodišče je ocenilo, da je bilo leta 2010 za vojaška zemljišča plačanih 4,25 milijona EUR.16 15 Člen 34 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
16 The precise extent of these military areas for which SAPS aid had been paid was not known to the national paying agency. 15 Special Report No 16/2012 – The effectiveness of the Single Area Payment Scheme as a transitional system for supporting farmers in the new Member States 
16 Nacionalna plačilna agencija ni natančno vedela, kako velike so te vojaške površine, za katere je bila plačana pomoč iz SEPP. 15 Posebno poročilo št. 16/2012 – Uspešnost sheme enotnega plačila na površino kot prehodnega sistema za podporo kmetom v novih državah članicah
16 BOX 1 STATE ENTITIES RECEIVING SAPS AID FOR ONLY FULFILLING PUBLIC FUNCTIONS UNDER NATIONAL LEGISLATION In Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Hungary large tracts of agricultural land are state owned. 
16 OKVIR 1 DRŽAVNI SUBJEKTI, KI PREJEMAJO POMOČ IZ SEPP SAMO ZA OPRAVLJANJE JAVNE FUNKCIJE V SKLADU Z NACIONALNO ZAKONODAJO Na Poljskem, v Romuniji, na Slovaškem in Madžarskem so velike površine kmetijskih zemljišč v državni lasti.
For example, in Poland, the Agricultural Property Agency which manages around two million hectares belonging to the State Treasury is the largest individual manager of agricultural land. 
Agencija za kmetijsko posest na Poljskem na primer, ki upravlja približno 2 milijona ha, ki pripadajo državni zakladnici, je največji samostojni upravitelj kmetijskih zemljišč.
The management authorities are not farming the land themselves but lease it to farmers who are usually entitled to claim SAPS aid in relation to the parcels they farm. 
Upravni organi na teh zemljiščih sami ne kmetujejo, temveč jih dajejo v zakup kmetom, ki so običajno upravičeni do pomoči iz SEPP za parcele, na katerih kmetujejo.
These Member States had no uniform policy vis-à-vis such entities: while in Slovakia and Romania they do not benefit from SAPS aid, in Poland, county offices of the Agricultural Property Agency receive annually about 1 million euro of SAPS aid in relation to land for which they have not found a tenant. 
Te države članice niso imele enotne politike za take subjekte: medtem ko na Slovaškem in v Romuniji ne prejemajo pomoči iz SEPP, na Poljskem okrajni uradi agencije za kmetijsko posest letno prejmejo približno 1 milijon EUR pomoči iz SEPP za zemljišča, za katera niso našli najemnika.
The county offices had entrusted service providers with the upkeep of the land to conserve its agricultural value at costs per hectare much lower than the annual SAPS aid. 
Okrajni uradi so ponudnikom storitev poverili vzdrževanje zemljišč za ohranitev njihove kmetijske vrednosti po ceni na hektar, ki je mnogo nižja od letne pomoči iz SEPP.
This is however a function which the authorities have to exercise anyway, because national legislation obliges them to maintain the value of the public property. 
Vendar je to funkcija, ki jo morajo organi opravljati v vsakem primeru, saj jih nacionalna zakonodaja obvezuje k ohranjanju vrednosti javne posesti.
In Hungary, the state is the largest individual SAPS beneficiary17. Such aid is paid, for example, in relation to national parks which are financed by the central state budget with the primary purpose of maintaining nature reserves. 
Na Madžarskem je država največji samostojni upravičenec SEPP.17 Taka pomoč se izplačuje na primer za nacionalne parke, ki se financirajo iz državnega proračuna z glavnim namenom ohranjanja naravnih rezervatov.
Other cases of institutional land users whose main objective is not farming include water management companies and municipalities. 
Med drugimi primeri institucionalnih uporabnikov zemljišč, katerih glavni cilj ni kmetovanje, so vodnogospodarska podjetja in občine.
The national authorities have no overview of the extent to which payments go to such entities. 
Nacionalni organi nimajo nobenega pregleda nad tem, koliko plačil prejmejo taki subjekti.
However, the Court estimates that 300 000 ha could be concerned for which the national authorities in 2010 paid around 50 million euro in SAPS aid. 
Vendar Sodišče ocenjuje, da bi se lahko to nanašalo na 300 000 ha, za katere so nacionalni organi v letu 2010 izplačali približno 50 milijonov EUR pomoči iz SEPP.
In Romania where municipalities own some 1,6 million ha of agricultural land, of which around 1,5 million ha is grassland, the Court found that in 2010 more than 1 000 municipalities and local authorities had received 23,5 million euro in SAPS aid in relation to some 340 000 ha of public land. 
Sodišče je v Romuniji, kjer so občine lastnice približno 1,6 milijona ha kmetijskih zemljišč, od katerih je 1,5 milijona ha travinja, ugotovilo, da je leta 2010 več kot 1 000 občin in lokalnih organov prejelo 23,5 milijona EUR pomoči iz SEPP za približno 340 000 ha javnih zemljišč.
This is land which local farmers mostly use in common, for example to graze their cattle or to harvest grass and on which the public owners have as a rule no own agricultural activity. 
To so zemljišča, ki jih lokalni kmetje večinoma uporabljajo skupaj, na primer za pašo živine ali košnjo trave, in na katerih se javni lastniki praviloma ne ukvarjajo s kmetijsko dejavnostjo.
The Romanian authorities recently took steps to better direct the payments to the farmers. These measures are however only partly effective and many farmers using the land are still excluded from SAPS payments. 
Romunski organi so nedavno sprejeli ukrepe za boljše usmerjanje plačil kmetom, ki pa so le deloma uspešni, in mnogo kmetov, ki uporabljajo zemljišča, še vedno ne prejema plačil iz SEPP.
The Court found similar cases in Bulgaria where the municipalities had created legal entities receiving SAPS aid in relation to public land which local farmers used for grazing their animals. 
Sodišče je podobne primere odkrilo v Bolgariji, kjer so občine ustanovile pravne subjekte, ki prejemajo pomoč iz SEPP za javna zemljišča, na katerih lokalni kmetje pasejo svojo živino.
In such cases the entities’ activities were limited to providing water for cattle or occasionally hiring workers to clear the land of bushes. 
V takih primerih so bile dejavnosti subjektov omejene na zagotavljanje vode za živino ali občasen najem delavcev za odstranjevanje grmovja z zemljišč.
Due to the scheduled increase in SAPS payments per hectare the annual amounts paid to these entities will increase until 2013 or, in Bulgaria and Romania, until 2016. 
Zaradi načrtovanega povečanja plačil iz SEPP na hektar bodo letni zneski, ki se izplačujejo tem subjektom, do leta 2013, v Bolgariji in Romuniji pa do leta 2016, naraščali.
In all cases mentioned above the aid does not support the revenue of a farmer but contributes to financing a public administration. 
V vseh navedenih primerih pomoč ne podpira dohodkov kmetov, ampak prispeva k financiranju javne uprave.