natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
44 Project No MS Project Name Acronym Beneficiary LIFE00 NAT/IT/007142 IT Improvement of the habitats of birds and restoration of electrical plants Po ENEL Consorzio Parco Regionale Delta del Po LIFE04 NAT/IT/000190 IT Conservation actions in Natura 2000 sites managed by the State Forest Service Corpo Forestale Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali - Corpo forestale dello Stato - Ufficio per la Biodiversità LIFE00 NAT/IT/007228 IT Conservation of Abies nebrodensis (Lojac) Mattei in situ and ex situ Nebrodensis Ente Parco Delle Madonie LIFE00 NAT/IT/007281 IT NEMOS project - improvement of Alpine wetland areas Nemos Provincia autonoma di Trento - Servizio Parchi e Foreste Demaniali LIFE05 NAT/IT/000009 IT Safeguard of the threatened raptors of the Matera Province RAPACI LUCANI Provincia di Matera LIFE04 NAT/SI/000240 SI Natura 2000 in Slovenia - management models and information system NATSLOMPIS Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for Nature Conservation LIFE03 NAT/SLO/000077 SI Establishing long-term protection of Crex crex in Slovenia Crex Slovenia DOPPS BirdLife Slovenia LIFE02 NAT/SLO/008587 SI Conservation of endangered habitats / species in the future Karst Park Karst park Univerza na Primorskem, Znastevno-raziskovalno sredisce-Koper LIFE03 NAT/SLO/000076 SI Conservation of endangered species and habitats in the Secovlje salt-pans Park Secovlje Soline, Pridelava soli d.o.o. 
11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija 44 Številka projekta DČ Ime projekta Akronim Upravičenec LIFE00 NAT/IT/007142 IT Izboljševanje habitatov za ptice in obnova elektrarn Po ENEL Consorzio Parco Regionale Delta del Po LIFE04 NAT/IT/000190 IT Ohranitveni ukrepi na območjih Natura 2000, ki jih upravlja državna gozdarska služba Corpo Forestale Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali – Corpo forestale dello Stato – Ufficio per la Biodiversità LIFE00 NAT/IT/007228 IT Ohranjanje siciljske jelke Abies nebro-densis (Lojac) Mattei in situ in ex situ Nebrodensis Ente Parco Delle Madonie LIFE00 NAT/IT/007281 IT Projekt NEMOS – izboljševanje alpskih mokrišč Nemos Provincia autonoma di Trento – Servizio Parchi e Foreste Demaniali LIFE05 NAT/IT/000009 IT Varovanje ogroženih ptic roparic v pokrajini Matera RAPACI LUCANI Provincia di Matera LIFE04 NAT/SI/000240 SI Natura 2000 v Sloveniji – modeli upravljanja in informacijski sistem NATSLOMPIS Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for Nature Conservation LIFE03 NAT/SLO/000077 SI Vzpostavitev dolgoročne zaščite kosca (Crex crex) v Sloveniji Razvoj strateškega omrežja posebnih trstičnih območij varstva za bobnarico (Botaurus stellaris) Crex Slovenia DOPPS BirdLife Slovenia LIFE02 NAT/SLO/008587 SI Ohranjanje ogroženih habitatov/vrst v prihodnjem kraškem parku Karst park Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstevno-raziskovalno središče Koper LIFE03 NAT/SLO/000076 SI Ohranjanje ogroženih vrst in habitatov v Sečoveljskih solinah Secovlje Soline, Pridelava soli d. o. o.
LIFE00 NAT/SLO/007231 SI Peatbogs in Triglav National Park Triglav Management plan and urgent actions for Veternik and Oslica high dry meadows Triglavski Narodni Park LIFE00 NAT/SLO/007223 SI Dry meadows Kozjanski Regional Park LIFE02 NAT/UK/008527 UK Developing a strategic network of SPA reedbeds for Botaurus stellaris Bittern Royal Society for the Protection of Birds LIFE02 NAT/UK/008541 UK Urgent Conservation Management for Scottish Capercaillie Capercaillie Caledonian Partnership, Highland Birchwoods LIFE04 NAT/GB/000250 UK Conservation of Atlantic salmon in Scotland CASS Scottish Natural Heritage LIFE00 NAT/UK/007079 UK Combatting urban pressures degrading European heathlands in Dorset Dorset heaths Dorset County Council, Planning Division LIFE00 NAT/UK/007071 UK Improving the management of Salisbury Plain Natura 2000 sites Salisbury Plain English Nature LIFE00 NAT/UK/007078 UK Restoration of Scottish raised bogs Scottish raised bogs Scottish Wildlife Trust special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
LIFE00 NAT/SLO/007231 LIFE00 NAT/SLO/007223 SI Šotišča v Triglavskem narodnem parku Načrt upravljanja in nujni ukrepi za suhe hribovske travnike na Veterniku in Oslici Triglav Triglavski narodni park SI Dry meadows Kozjanski regionalni park LIFE02 NAT/UK/008527 UK Bittern Royal Society for the Protection of Birds LIFE02 NAT/UK/008541 UK Nujno upravljanje ohranjanja za škotskega divjega petelina (Scottish Capercaillie) Capercaillie Caledonian Partnership, Highland Birchwoods LIFE04 NAT/GB/000250 UK Ohranjanje atlantskega lososa na Škotskem CASS Scottish Natural Heritage LIFE00 NAT/UK/007079 UK Boj proti urbanemu pritisku, ki uničuje evropske resave v Dorsetu Dorset heaths Dorset County Council, Planning Division LIFE00 NAT/UK/007071 UK Izboljševanje upravljanja območij Natura 2000 v pokrajini Salisbury Plain Salisbury Plain English Nature LIFE00 NAT/UK/007078 UK Obnavljanje škotskih visokih barij Scottish raised bogs Scottish Wildlife Trust posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
Date or period Activity 21.11.2008 Deadline for applicants to send proposals to Member State authorities 5.1.2009 Deadline for the Member States to forward proposals to the European Commission January to July 2009 Admissibility, exclusion and eligibility, evaluation and revision of the proposals 31.12.2009 Deadline for signing grant agreements 1.1.2010 Earliest possible starting date for the 2008 projects special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
1. 1. 5.
47 Annex iii mAnAGement PLAns according to article 6 of the habitats directive, member states shall establish the necessary conservation measures involving, if need be, appropriate management plans specifically designed for the sites or integrated into other development plans, and appropriate statutory, administrative or contractual measures. 
47 PrIlOga III načrtI UPraVljanja Člen 6 direktive o habitatih določa, da države članice določijo potrebne ohranitvene ukrepe, ki po potrebi vključujejo ustrezne načrte upravljanja, pripravljene posebej za ta območja ali zajete v drugih razvojnih načrtih, ter ustrezne zakonske, upravne ali pogodbene ukrepe.
These measures are implemented through the natura 2000 network, taking into account economic, social and cultural requirements and regional and local characteristics. a management plan should contain the following elements: • policy statement with reference to article 6 of the habitats directive; • site description, including a historical land use analysis; • statement of objectives, including long-term and short-term goals; • statement of the constraints, including identification of the actors involved; • realistic list of actions to implement with time schedules and financial planning; • a detailed consultation process; • monitoring and evaluation. recital (6) of the life+ regulation ((eC) no 614/2007) stresses the financial limitations to the instrument for the management of natura 2000 sites, stating that 'arrangements should be established to ensure adequate financing for the natura 2000 network, including Community co-financing. since the aim of this regulation is to finance only best-practice or demonstration projects related to the management of natura 2000 sites, the Commission and member states should ensure that sufficient funds are made available through other instruments for the management of the network, the annual cost of which was estimated in 2004 to be around 6 100 million euro'. special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
Ti ukrepi se izvajajo v omrežju natura 2000, pri njih pa se upoštevajo gospodarske, socialne in kulturne zahteve ter regionalne in lokalne značilnosti. načrt upravljanja bi morali sestavljati: • izjava o politiki ob upoštevanju člena 6 direktive o habitatih; • opis območja, vključno z analizo uporabe zemljišča v preteklosti; • izjava o ciljih, vključno z dolgoročnimi in kratkoročnimi cilji; • izjava o omejitvah, vključno z opredelitvijo udeleženih akterjev; • stvaren seznam ukrepov, ki bodo izvedeni, s časovno razporeditvijo in finančnim načrtom; • podroben posvetovalni proces; • spremljanje in vrednotenje. v uvodni izjavi (6) uredbe o LIFe+ ((es) št. 614/2007) so poudarjene finančne omejitve instrumenta za upravljanje območij natura 2000, in sicer je navedeno: „Treba bi bilo predvideti ureditve za zagotovitev ustreznega financiranja omrežja natura 2000, vključno s sofinanciranjem skupnosti. ker je namen te uredbe financirati le najboljše prakse ali predstavitvene projekte, povezane z upravljanjem območij natura 2000, bi morale komisija in države članice zagotoviti, da bo na voljo dovolj sredstev prek drugih instrumentov za upravljanje omrežja, za katerega so bili letni stroški leta 2004 ocenjeni na približno 6 100 milijonov eur“. posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
reply of The Commission executive summAry i. life is the eu’s financial instrument dedicated specifically to supporting environmental and nature conservation projects throughout the eu. it has existed since 1992. The current instrument, life+, covers the period from 1 january 2007 to 31 december 20131 and provides some 1.7 billion euro as co-financing for environment projects. at least 50 % of this sum must be allocated to projects supporting the conservation of nature and biodiversity. life+ co-finances actions in three main areas or components: life+ nature and biodiversity; life+ environment and governance; life+ information and Communication. 
oDGovorI komIsIje POVzetek I. LIFe je finančni instrument eu, posebej namenjen podpori projektom za ohranjanje okolja in narave po vsej eu. obstaja od leta 1992. sedanji instrument LIFe+ se nanaša na obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 20131 in zagotavlja približno 1,7 milijarde eur sofinanciranja za okoljske projekte. vsaj 50 % tega zneska mora biti dodeljenih projektom, ki podpirajo ohranjanje narave in biotske raznovrstnosti.
The specific objective of life-nature is to contribute to the implementation of Community nature protection legislation: the 'birds' directive (79/409/eeC), the 'habitats' directive (92/43/eeC), and the establishment of the 'natura 2000' network. in its latest form, life+ nature and biodiversity, it also co-finances innovative or demonstration projects that contribute to implementing the objectives of the Commission Communication on “halt-ing the loss of biodiversity by 2010 – and beyond”. 
LIFe+ sofinancira ukrepe na treh glavnih področjih ali sestavnih delih: LIFe+ „narava in biotska raznovrstnost“; LIFe+ „okoljska politika in upravljanje“; LIFe+ „informacije in obveščanje“. poseben cilj instrumenta LIFe-narava je prispevati k izvajanju zakonodaje skupnosti o varstvu narave: Direktive o pticah (79/409/eGs) in Direktive o habitatih (92/43/eGs) ter k vzpostavitvi omrežja „natura 2000“. sklop LIFe+, ki se nanaša na naravo in biotsko raznovrstnost, v svoji najnovejši obliki sofinancira tudi inovativne ali predstavitvene projekte, ki prispevajo k izvajanju ciljev sporočila komisije o zaustavitvi izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 in pozneje.
1 The legal basis for life+ is regulation (eC) no 614/2007 of the european parliament and of the Council of 23 may 2007, published in the official journal of the european union l 149 of 9 june 2007. 
1 pravna podlaga za LIFe+ je uredba (es) št.
49 although life is indeed the most important european funding instrument specifically dedicated to the environment, other Community funds such as the structural funds or the eafrd (european agricultural fund for rural development) provide a very important financial contribution to the protection of the environment. iii. 
49 Čeprav je LIFe dejansko najpomembnejši evropski instrument financiranja, ki je posebej namenjen okolju, drugi skladi skupnosti, kot so strukturni skladi ali eksrp (evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja), zagotavljajo zelo pomemben finančni prispevek k varstvu okolja.
The Commission welcomes the Court's observation that since the life instrument started in 1992, it has progressively improved its management and control systems, acknowledging that it has taken into account the result of the Court's previous audits. vi. 
III. komisija izraža zadovoljstvo ob opažanju sodišča, da je od uvedbe instrumenta LIFe leta 1992 postopoma izboljšala svoje upravljavske in kontrolne sisteme, in priznava, da je upoštevala rezultate prejšnjih revizij sodišča.
The Commission takes note of the Court's positive and constructive appraisal of the life programme in favour of nature conservation. The Commission does its outmost to ensure that only appropriately designed project proposals are approved and that they are implemented as planned. it also checks on the adequacy of the applicants' organisational and financial structures. vii. 
VI. komisija sprejema v vednost, da je sodišče pozitivno in konstruktivno ocenilo program LIFe v korist ohranjanja narave. komisija si po svojih najboljših močeh prizadeva zagotoviti, da se odobrijo samo ustrezno zasnovani projektni predlogi in da se projekti izvajajo po načrtu. preverja tudi ustreznost organizacijske in finančne strukture vlagateljev.
The Commission agrees that there is still room for progress in ensuring that the conservation measures co-financed by the eu are sustained after the closure of the projects, building on the significant improvements already made. (a) While acknowledging that the life+ evaluation guidelines do not contain as many detailed questions on sustainability (there is now a single selection process for the three life+ components, with all projects competing with each other and being assessed equally) the Commission would highlight that sustainability remains an important component of the selection and award criteria. reply of The Commission The Commission agrees with the Court that the length of the award granting process is largely due to the interinstitutional procedures established in the life+ regulation. (b) greater attention is being given to monitoring project results and their sustainability, as well as to management plans since life+ came into effect. requirements on these aspects are now stricter and clearer, as reflected in the application forms and the related guidelines issued. (c) The Commission has gradually strengthened the requirements on dissemination for project beneficiaries, and, for its part, has been improving the quantity and quality of the information available on the life website. 
VII. komisija se strinja, da je mogoče doseči še večji napredek pri zagotavljanju, da se ohranitveni ukrepi, ki jih sofinancira eu, ohranijo tudi po koncu projektov, pri čemer je treba graditi na že doseženih pomembnih izboljšavah. (a) komisija sicer priznava, da smernice za ocenjevanje LIFe+ ne vsebujejo toliko podrobnih vprašanj o trajnosti (zdaj obstaja enotni izbirni postopek za vse tri sestavne dele LIFe+, pri čemer vsi projekti tekmujejo drug z drugim in se ocenjujejo enako), vendar želi poudariti, da trajnost ostaja pomembna komponenta meril za izbiro in dodelitev. oDGovorI komIsIje komisija se strinja s sodiščem, da so za dolgotrajen proces odločanja o dodelitvi donacij večinoma krivi medinstitucionalni postopki, določeni v uredbi o LIFe+. (b) odkar je začel veljati LIFe+, se spremljanju rezultatov projektov in njihovi trajnosti ter tudi načrtom upravljanja namenja večja pozornost.
The Commission agrees that there is potential to further improve the dissemination of project results. (d) The Commission is currently setting up mechanisms for carrying out more systematic ex-post visits from 2009 to assess sustainability and is placing greater emphasis on indicators. viii. 
Zahteve v zvezi s temi vidiki so zdaj strožje in jasnejše, kot je izraženo v obrazcih za vloge in s temi povezanih izdanih smernicah. (c) komisija je postopoma okrepila zahteve po razširjanju za upravičence projektov, sama pa izboljšuje količino in kakovost informacij, ki so na voljo na spletni strani LIFe. komisija se strinja, da je razširjanje rezultatov projektov mogoče dodatno izboljšati. (d) komisija trenutno vzpostavlja mehanizme za izvajanje bolj sistematičnih naknadnih obiskov od leta 2009 za oceno trajnosti in daje večji poudarek kazalnikom.
The Commission is currently addressing the issues of sustainability, knowledge dissemination and project follow-up, inter alia by setting up a mechanism for carrying out more systematic ex-post visits to projects from 2009. special report no 11/2009 - The sustainability and the Commission's management of the life-nature projects 
VIII. komisija trenutno obravnava vprašanja trajnosti, razširjanja znanja in nadaljnjega spremljanja projektov, med drugim z vzpostavitvijo mehanizma za izvajanje bolj sistematičnih naknadnih obiskov projektov od leta 2009. posebno poročilo št. 11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija
50 introduction 5. The Commission underlines that life+ nature and biodiversity is primarily meant to be a catalyst for nature conservation in the eu, supporting step-change best practice or demonstration measures. 
50 UVOd 5. komisija poudarja, da naj bi bil sklop LIFe+, ki se nanaša na naravo in biotsko raznovrstnost, predvsem katalizator za ohranjanje narave v eu, ki podpira bistveno spremenjene najboljše prakse ali predstavitvene ukrepe.
7. since 1992, life has co-financed some 2,750 projects. around 700 project proposals are received and evaluated every year for the three components of life+. 
7. LIFe je od leta 1992 financiral približno 2 750 projektov. vsako leto prispe približno 700 projektnih predlogov za vse tri sestavne dele LIFe+, ki so nato ocenjeni.
10. The Commission is currently setting up mechanisms for carrying out more systematic ex-post visits to assess sustainability from 2009. greater emphasis gradually being placed on monitoring and evaluating project results, with life+ containing stricter and clearer requirements in this regard. 
10. komisija trenutno vzpostavlja mehanizme za izvajanje bolj sistematičnih naknadnih obiskov za oceno trajnosti od leta 2009. večji poudarek se postopoma daje spremljanju in ocenjevanju rezultatov projektov, LIFe+ pa vsebuje strožje in jasnejše zahteve v zvezi s tem.
Audit scoPe And APProAch 15. life+ is meant to carry out step-change best practice or demonstration measures. 
Obseg reVIzIje In reVIzIjskI PrIstOP 15. LIFe+ naj bi izvajal bistveno spremenjene najboljše prakse ali predstavitvene ukrepe.
The primary responsibility for the sustainable nature conservation as laid down in article 6 of the habitats directive lies with the member states. although life is indeed the most important european funding instrument specifically dedicated to the environment, other Community funds such as the structural funds or the eafrd (european agricultural fund for rural development) provide a very important financial contribution to the protection of the environment. reply of The Commission observAtions 19. some of the shortcomings identified in Table 1 for individual projects are beyond the Commission’s control. for certain, the responsibility lies with the beneficiary (e.g. local population not adequately informed), while others are caused by factors beyond the beneficiary’s control (e.g. increase in land prices, demographic pressure). 
Glavno odgovornost za trajno ohranjanje narave, kot je določeno v členu 6 Direktive o habitatih, nosijo države članice. Čeprav je LIFe dejansko najpomembnejši evropski instrument financiranja, ki je posebej namenjen okolju, drugi skladi skupnosti, kot so strukturni skladi ali eksrp (evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja), zagotavljajo zelo pomemben finančni prispevek k varstvu okolja. oDGovorI komIsIje OPažanja 19. na nekatere pomanjkljivosti, opredeljene v tabeli 1 za posamezne projekte, komisija nima vpliva.
25. The Commission acknowledges that a certain level of discretion is left to the evaluators regarding sustainability aspects included under the 'conservation benefit' or 'contribution to objectives' criteria, but points out that the evaluation methodology used, whereby each project is assessed by two independent evaluators — with a third evaluation carried out where significant discrepancy occurs — minimises the risk of this discretion weighing substantially on the selection outcome. 
25. komisija priznava, da imajo ocenjevalci določeno stopnjo svobode v zvezi z vidiki trajnosti, vključenimi pod merili „koristi za ohranjenost“ ali „prispevek k ciljem“, vendar poudarja, da uporabljena metodologija ocenjevanja, pri kateri vsak projekt ocenita dva neodvisna ocenjevalca – in pri kateri se v primeru pomembnega odstopanja opravi tretja ocena –, zmanjša tveganje, da bi ta diskrecija bistveno vplivala na rezultat izbire.
26. The Commission is fully committed to ensuring that sustainability criteria — as all other criteria — are evaluated in a consistent and transparent manner. The Commission acknowledges that sustainability criteria have become less visible in life+ compared to life iii, namely for the reasons pointed out by the Court (in order to allow the proposals from the three life+ components to be evaluated according to the same criteria and to compete with one another). 
26. komisija si prizadeva v celoti zagotoviti, da se merila trajnosti – kot vsa druga merila – ocenjujejo dosledno in pregledno. komisija priznava, da so merila trajnosti postala manj vidna pri LIFe+ v primerjavi z LIFe III, predvsem zaradi razlogov, ki jih je izpostavilo sodišče (da so se lahko predlogi, ki so se nanašali na vse tri sestavne dele LIFe+, lahko ocenjevali na podlagi istih meril in da so lahko bili med seboj konkurenčni). komisija bo torej razmislila o morebitnih možnostih za povečanje vidnosti trajnosti kot merila za ocenjevanje. posebno poročilo št.
51 box 1 There are some uncertainties before the beginning of projects regarding sustainability, and the selection evaluators are right to point them out. however, this should not necessarily entail heavy penalties in points. for example, few financers will give a firm commitment to continue funding actions even before the project starts. many projects funded by life will require maintenance in order to continue the environmental benefits achieved. not financing such projects would considerably restrict the number of habitats and species which could benefit from life funding compared to those targeted by the directives. reply of The Commission The difference in the length of the selection process with the eafrd and the eff is explained by the different management and implementing mechanisms for the latter. in the case of eafrd the principle of 'shared management' gives member states substantial responsibilities. 
11/2009 – Trajnost projektov LIFe-narava in kako jih upravlja komisija 51 Okvir 1 obstaja nekaj negotovosti pred začetkom projektov v zvezi s trajnostjo in izbirni ocenjevalci jih upravičeno izpostavijo. vendar to ne bi smelo nujno povzročiti težkih kazni pri točkah. na primer, malo financerjev se bo še pred začetkom projekta trdno zavezalo, da bodo še naprej financirali ukrepe. mnoge projekte, ki jih financira LIFe, bo treba vzdrževati, da bi se dosežene okoljske koristi nadaljevale.
This approach allows member states to make the selection of the projects. 
Ta pristop omogoča državam članicam, da opravijo izbiro projektov. komisija se strinja, da je lahko dolgotrajen izbirni postopek vir omejitev za nekatere projekte.
The Commission agrees that the lengthy selection procedure can be a source of constraints for some projects. life+ has sought to address this issue by introducing an inception report allowing both the beneficiary and the Commission to re-examine whether appropriate conditions for implementation still exist. 
LIFe+ je to poskušal rešiti z uvedbo začetnega poročila, ki upravičencu in komisiji omogoča, da ponovno preučita, ali še obstajajo ustrezni pogoji za izvajanje.