natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The opinion also warned about the possible consequences if "the new Member States attempt to meet the criteria for EMU membership as quickly as possible and in so doing adhere closely to the criteria governing the Stability and Growth Pact".
Razen tega v mnenju svarijo pred možnimi učinki, kajti „nove dežele članice poskušajo /.../ čimprej izpolniti merila za vstop v gospodarsko in denarno unijo ter se v tem prizadevanju skrbno ravnajo po merilih Pakta o stabilnosti in rasti /.../".
The opinion analyses the development of global trade, based on a study by the EU Commission as published in the last term of 2006, and examines the reasons for increasing offshore outsourcing , both in goods and services , and examines EU strengths and weaknesses.
Mnenje analizira razvoj svetovnega trgovinskega sistema, ki temelji na študiji Evropske komisije, objavljeni v zadnjem četrtletju 2006, preučuje razloge za povečanje obsega zunanjega izvajanja dela v tujini tako na področju izdelkov kot storitev, preučuje pa tudi prednosti in slabosti EU.
The opinion analyses the main problems existing in Colombia and Peru, which will need to be monitored by the civil society organisations.
V mnenju so analizirane najpomembnejše težave v Kolumbiji in Peruju, ki jih morajo organizacije civilne družbe spremljati.
The opinion analyses the main problems existing in Colombia and Peru, which will need to be monitored by the civil society organisations.
V mnenju so analizirani najpomembnejši problemi v Kolumbiji in Peruju, ki jih morajo spremljati organizacije civilne družbe.
The opinion analyses the main shortcomings suffered by innovation in the EU, and identifies a series of actions in order to overcome these.
Mnenje analizira glavne pomanjkljivosti zaradi inovacij v EU in navaja nekaj možnih ukrepov za njihov odpravo.
The opinion argued that a new European Social Action Programme was needed "so that EU social developments can keep pace with economic and market developments".
V mnenju je bilo navedeno, da je nov akcijski program socialnih ukrepov EU potreben za to, "da bi socialni razvoj EU lahko dohiteval gospodarski in tržni razvoj".
The opinion argued, among other things, that "mobility in Europe should remain one of the EU's political priorities", and that "measures […] must contribute to establishing a new concept for a fair and balanced mobility", "curbing social dumping and undeclared work".
V mnenju je bilo med drugim ugotovljeno, da mora "mobilnost v Evropi [...] ostati politična prednostna naloga EU", in da morajo sprejeti ukrepi [...] prispevati k oblikovanju novega koncepta pravične in uravnotežene mobilnosti ter preprečevati socialni dumping in nezakonito delo.
The opinion argues strongly in favour of the Community method.
Mnenje močno zagovarja metodo Skupnosti.
The opinion argues that the EU's relations with Mexico should be understood in the framework of the overall relations with Latin America.
Mnenje navaja, da je odnose EU z Mehiko treba obravnavati v okviru splošnih odnosov z Latinsko Ameriko.
The opinion as a whole is marked by an inexplicable lack of references to previous EESC opinions on various issues, as if they did not exist.
Celotnemu mnenju nerazumljivo manjkajo sklici na predhodna mnenja EESO o različnih temah, kot da se Odbor še ne bi izrekel o njih.
The opinion as a whole is marked by an inexplicable lack of references to previous EESC opinions on various issues, as if they did not exist: since in this case the opinion in question was adopted recently, its absence is even worse.
Celotnemu mnenju nerazumljivo manjkajo sklici na predhodna mnenja EESO o različnih temah, kot da se Odbor še ne bi izrekel o njih.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 103 votes in favour, 13 against and 10 abstentions.
Mnenje v celoti je bilo sprejeto s 103 glasovi za, 13 glasovi proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 147 votes in favour, 1 vote against and 6 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 147 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 153 votes to 21, with 14 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo kot celota sprejeto s 153 glasovi za, 21 proti in 14 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 159 votes to 3 with 11 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 159 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 172 votes in favour with 6 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo v celoti sprejeto s 172 glasovi za in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 175 votes to 2 with 3 abstentions.
Mnenje kot celota je bilo sprejeto s 175 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 182 votes in favour, 2 votes against and 7 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 182 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 70 votes in favour and 2 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo v celoti sprejeto s 70 glasovi za in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion as a whole was adopted by 79 votes to 20, with 8 abstentions.
Mnenje kot celota je bilo sprejeto z 79 glasovi za, 20 glasovi proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was adopted with 128 votes in favour, 5 against and 4 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 128 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was put to a vote and adopted by 71 votes in favour with one abstention.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto z 71 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion as a whole was put to a vote and adopted by 89 votes to two with five abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto z 89 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was put to the vote and adopted by 108 votes in favour, with five abstentions.
Celotno mnenje je bilo sprejeto z večino, s 108 glasovi za in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was put to the vote and adopted unanimously by 135 votes in favour and four abstentions.
Celotno mnenje je bilo nato dano na glasovanje in sprejeto s 135 glasovi za in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was put to the vote and adopted with 170 votes in favour, with nine votes against and 22 abstentions.
Celotno mnenje je bilo nato sprejeto s 170 glasovi za, 9 glasovi proti in 22 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was put to the vote and was adopted by 102 votes to 5, with 48 abstentions.
Mnenje v celoti je bilo sprejeto z večino, s 120 glasovi za, 5 proti in 48 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was put to the vote and was adopted by 140 votes to 14, with 10 abstentions.
Celotno mnenje je bilo sprejeto z večino, s 140 glasovi za, 14 glasovi proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as a whole was put to the vote and was adopted by a majority of 45 votes to 26, with two abstentions.
Pri glasovanju o celotnem besedilu je bilo mnenje Odbora soglasno sprejeto s 45 glasovi za, 26 proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion as a whole was put to the vote and was adopted by a majority, with 38 votes to one, and five abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto z večino glasov (38 za, 1 proti in 5 vzdržanimi).
The opinion as a whole was put to the vote.
Celotno mnenje je bilo dano na glasovanje.
The opinion as a whole was then put to the vote and adopted by 108 votes with four abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo predloženo na glasovanje in sprejeto s 108 glasovi za in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was adopted by 106 votes to 2, with 30 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 30 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was adopted by 164 votes to 2, with 9 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 164 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was adopted by 78 votes to 18 with nine abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto z 78 glasovi za, 18 glasovi proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by 152 votes to 8, with 12 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 152 glasovi za, 8 glasovi proti in 12 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by 218 votes in favour, 16 against and 9 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto z 218 glasovi za, 16 glasovi proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the assembly by 113 votes to 18 and 15 abstentions.
Plenarna skupščina je o tako spremenjenem mnenju glasovala in ga sprejela s 113 glasovi za, 18 glasovi proti in 15 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the Assembly by 118 votes to 32, with 15 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je skupščina sprejela s 118 glasovi za, 32 glasovi proti in 15 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the assembly by 122 votes to 75 and 33 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je plenarna skupščina sprejela s 122 glasovi za, 75 glasovi proti in 33 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the assembly by 135 votes to four and three abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je plenarna skupščina sprejela s 135 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the assembly by 138 votes to 8 and 13 abstentions.
Plenarna skupščina je o tako spremenjenem mnenju glasovala in ga sprejela s 138 glasovi za, 8 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the assembly by 146 votes to 45 and 16 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je plenarna skupščina sprejela s 146 glasovi za, 45 glasovi proti in 16 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the assembly by 151 votes to 3 and 11 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je plenarna skupščina sprejela s 151 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the Assembly by 164 votes to 73, with 12 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je plenarna skupščina sprejela s 164 glasovi za, 73 glasovi proti in 12 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the Assembly by 165 votes to 9, with 5 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je plenarna skupščina sprejela s 165 glasovi za, 9 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the assembly by 178 votes to 6, with 15 abstentions.
Plenarna skupščina je o tako spremenjenem mnenju glasovala in ga sprejela s 178 glasovi za, 6 glasovi proti in 15 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and adopted by the assembly by 189 votes to two with 11 abstentions.
Plenarna skupščina je tako spremenjeno mnenje sprejela s 189 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as amended was put to the vote and the Assembly adopted it by 121 votes to 46, with 11 abstentions.
Skupščina je o tako spremenjenem mnenju glasovala in ga sprejela s 121 glasovi za, 46 glasovi proti in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion as drafted seems to be unaware of these recent key developments.
Zdi se, da v pripravljenem mnenju ni upoštevan ta ključen razvoj dogodkov.
The opinion as drafted seems to be unaware of these recent key developments.
Zdi se, da v pripravljenem mnenju niso upoštevan ta najnovejši ključni razvoj dogodkov.
The opinion asks that the Commission should study proposing a standard basis.
Mnenje zahteva, da Komisija preuči predlog za standardno osnovo.
The opinion backs proposals for revising energy policy governance, with the Commission's support.
Mnenje podpira predloge o spremembi upravljanja energetske politike ob podpori Komisije.
The Opinion begins by explaining why the traditional justification for intervening to address failures in the market may well be a vital component of this policy.
Mnenje se začne z obrazložitvijo, zakaj je tradicionalna utemeljitev ukrepanja za odpravljanje slabosti na trgu morda celo bistvena komponenta te politike.
The opinion being a roadmap for future EESC work on sustainable development.
mnenje je načrt za prihodnje delo EESO na področju trajnostnega razvoja;
The opinion builds upon the analysis set out in the recently adopted EESC opinion "Baltic Sea Region: the role of organised civil society in improving regional cooperation and identifying a regional strategy"3.
Mnenje temelji na analizi iz nedavno sprejetega mnenja EESO o baltski regiji: vloga organizirane civilne družbe pri izboljševanju regionalnega sodelovanja in opredeljevanju regionalne strategije3.
The opinion builds upon the analysis set out in the recently adopted EESC opinion “Baltic Sea Region: the role of organised civil society in improving regional cooperation and identifying a regional strategy”3.
Mnenje temelji na analizi iz nedavno sprejetega mnenja EESO o baltski regiji: vloga organizirane civilne družbe pri izboljševanju regionalnega sodelovanja in opredeljevanju regionalne strategije3.
The opinion builds upon the analysis set out in the recently adopted EESC opinions "Baltic Sea Region: the role of organised civil society in improving regional cooperation and identifying a regional strategy"1 and "Macro-regional cooperation: Rolling out the Baltic Sea Strategy to other macro-regions in Europe"2.
Mnenje temelji na analizi iz nedavno sprejetih mnenj EESO o baltski regiji: vloga organizirane civilne družbe pri izboljševanju regionalnega sodelovanja in opredeljevanju regionalne strategije1 in o makroregionalnem sodelovanju – razširitev strategije za Baltik na druge evropske makroregije2.
The opinion builds upon the analysis set out in the recently adopted EESC opinions “Baltic Sea Region: the role of organised civil society in improving regional cooperation and identifying a regional strategy”1 and “Macro-regional cooperation: Rolling out the Baltic Sea Strategy to other macro-regions in Europe2”.
Mnenje temelji na analizi iz nedavno sprejetih mnenj EESO o baltski regiji: vloga organizirane civilne družbe pri izboljševanju regionalnega sodelovanja in opredeljevanju regionalne strategije1 in o makroregionalnem sodelovanju – razširitev strategije za Baltik na druge evropske makroregije2.
The opinion called for a higher profile for Commission and Member State efforts to promote multilingualism.
Mnenje zahteva vidnejša prizadevanja Komisije in držav članic pri spodbujanju večjezičnosti.
The opinion called for the reinforcement of the independence of national data protection authorities and for the establishment of an EU Authority to consider the broader societal ramifications of the Internet on a 10 to 20 year timescale.
Mnenje je vsebovalo poziv k večji neodvisnosti nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov in k ustanovitvi organa EU, ki bo analiziral širše družbene učinke interneta v prihodnjem časovnem obdobju 10 do 20 let.
The opinion calls also for better organisation of the information schemes as well as of the continuity of care in the home country of the patient.
V mnenju je zahtevana tudi boljša organizacija sistema obveščanja ter kontinuiteta zdravljenja v državi pacienta.
The opinion calls for a greater emphasis on social dialogue between employers and trade unions in the transport sector in order to prevent social conflicts, fully respecting workers' rights to collective action, in accordance with Article 151 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Mnenje temelji na stališču, da je treba za preprečevanje socialnih konfliktov več poudarka nameniti socialnemu dialogu med delodajalci in sindikati v prometnem sektorju, ob doslednem upoštevanju pravic delavcev do kolektivnega ukrepanja, kar je v skladu s členom 151 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The opinion calls for a mid-term review of the regulations governing investment through the ESIFs.
EESO v mnenju poziva, naj se izvede vmesni pregled uredb o naložbah iz skladov ESI.
The opinion calls for a new Integrated Urban Agenda for the EU giving the urban dimension a structural basis in European policies and legislation.
Mnenje poziva k novi celostni agendi urbanih območij za EU, ki mestni razsežnosti zagotavlja strukturno podlago v evropskih politikah in zakonodaji.
The opinion calls for a set of measures, namely: priority to be given to international agreements; measures to promote the best and most energy-efficient technologies; consideration to be given to investments already undertaken; the capacity of individual sectors to cut emissions to be taken into account with due consideration for technical standards; and a speedy decision to acknowledge the dangers of carbon leakage.
Mnenje poziva k naslednjemu: mednarodni sporazumi morajo biti prednostna naloga; spodbujanje širjenja najboljših in energetsko najučinkovitejših tehnologij; upoštevanje preteklih naložb; pri sposobnosti posameznih sektorjev za zmanjšanje emisij je treba upoštevati tehnične standarde; hitra odločitev o priznavanju nevarnosti prenosa emisij CO2 v tretje države (carbon leakage).
The opinion calls for EU agreements to be concluded with third countries and regional organisations.
Odbor poziva k sklenitvi sporazumov EU s tretjimi državami in regionalnimi organizacijami.
The opinion calls for existing or future trade or economic partnership association agreements to include bilateral clauses on social security, referring in particular to equal treatment, the export of pensions and the elimination of double contributions.
V mnenju je izražena želja, da se v veljavne ali prihodnje sporazume o pridružitvi, trgovinske sporazume ali sporazume o gospodarskem partnerstvu vključijo dvostranske določbe o socialni varnosti, ki se bodo nanašale zlasti na enako obravnavo, prenos pokojnin in odpravo dvojnih prispevkov.
The opinion calls for the establishment of a European customs training institute and appropriate national and EU funding.
Mnenje poziva k ustanovitvi evropskega inštituta za usposabljanje na carinskem področju ter k ustreznim nacionalnim finančnim sredstvom in sredstvom EU.
The opinion calls on an EU-Serbia Joint Consultative Committee to be established between the EESC and Serbian civil society organisations so that civil society views and concerns can be reflected during the negotiations.
Odbor v mnenju poziva k oblikovanju skupnega posvetovalnega odbora EU-Srbija, ki naj bi ga ustanovili EESO in srbske organizacije civilne družbe, tako da bi se v prihodnjih pristopnih pogajanjih lahko odražala stališča in skrbi civilne družbe.
The opinion CCMI/063 was adopted by 152 votes to five, with 12 abstentions.
Mnenje CCMI/063 je bilo sprejeto s 152 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 12 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion comes against a backdrop characterised by three negative scenarios within an economic crisis of colossal proportions: A. Little progress has been made towards achieving the objectives of the Lisbon strategy; B. An enormous crisis has hit the financial sector; C. The results of the UN Copenhagen summit on climate change were inadequate.
Splošni okvir, v katerem je bila oblikovana zahteva belgijskega predsedstva, je povezan s tremi negativnimi scenariji sredi zelo obsežne gospodarske krize: a) skoraj nobeden od dobro zastavljenih ciljev lizbonske strategije ni bil uresničen; b) finančni sektor je prizadela huda kriza in c) rezultati vrha OZN v Københavnu so nezadostni.
The opinion comments on the various measures presented in the Commission communication while drawing the attention the measures it still considers missing in the single market roadmap.
V mnenju so preučeni različni ukrepi, predstavljeni v sporočilu Komisije, hkrati pa je opozorjeno na ukrepe, za katere Odbor še vedno meni, da bi jih bilo treba vključiti v časovni načrt za enotni trg.
The opinion concentrates only on this aspect of "offshore outsourcing"
Mnenje se osredotoča le na ta vidik "zunanjega izvajanja dela v tujini".
The opinion concerned the establishment of "sector councils on employment and skills", bodies of a new type, which would have to operate dynamically and coordinate appropriately with existing European and national bodies (sectoral social dialogue committees, observatories, etc.).
Mnenje obravnava ustanovitev "sektorskih svetov za zaposlovanje in usposobljenost", organov nove vrste, ki bi morali dinamično delovati in svoje delovanje ustrezno usklajevati z obstoječimi evropskimi in nacionalnimi organi (sektorskimi odbori za socialni dialog, centri za spremljanje itd.).
The opinion concerns the fixed-wing sector of the EU civil aeronautics industry serving the passenger and freight transport market.
Mnenje obravnava sektor evropske letalske industrije civilnega potniškega in tovornega prevoza z letali z nepremičnimi krili.
The opinion considered that the austerity measures would have a negative impact on citizens, mainly on the vulnerable sections of society, and that it was crucial to better assess the social impact of the new economic governance rules on the European people.
V mnenju je zastopano stališče, da bodo imeli varčevalni ukrepi negativne posledice za državljane, predvsem za ranljive segmente družbe, in da je ključnega pomena temeljiteje oceniti socialne učinke novih predpisov o gospodarskem upravljanju na evropske državljane.
The opinion considers that the provision of water and the functioning of infrastructures should be covered by the EUSF even if the disaster is not caused by a rapid event.
V mnenju je izražena ocena, da bi Solidarnostni sklad EU oskrbo z vodo in delovanje infrastruktur moral pokrivati tudi, če nesreča ne nastane zaradi nenadnega dogodka.
The opinion considers then that priority should now be given to the real economy, to growth and employment measures.
V mnenju je navedeno, da bi bilo treba dati prednost realnemu gospodarstvu ter ukrepom za spodbujanje rasti in zaposlovanja.
The opinion constitutes the EESC voice in the debate on this subject among the EU institutions and the Member States.
Mnenje predstavlja prispevek EESO k razpravi o tej temi med institucijami EU in državami članicami.
The opinion contained new elements such as the "electronic visiting card."
Mnenje vsebuje inovativne elemente, kot je »elektronska vizitka«.
The opinion contains a long list of good examples of Member States' measures to tackle youth unemployment.
V mnenju je opisana vrsta primerov dobre prakse iz držav članic glede ukrepov proti brezposelnosti mladih.
The opinion contains a number of interesting points to be taken into account with regard to the forward-looking changes to be proposed for the revised strategy.
To vsebuje vrsto zanimivih vprašanj, ki jih bo treba upoštevati pri spremembah, usmerjenih v prihodnost, ki bodo predlagane za revidirano strategijo.
The Opinion contains detailed proposals to this end.
Mnenje vsebuje podrobne predloge v ta namen.
The opinion could address the following social issues:
Mnenje bi lahko obravnavalo naslednja socialna vprašanja:
The opinion could cover aspects such as the various forms of voluntary work and unpaid help in the EU, and the diversity of organisations dealing with voluntary work.
Mnenje bi lahko obravnavalo različne vidike prostovoljnega dela in neplačane pomoči v EU ter različne organizacije, dejavne na področju prostovoljnega dela.
the opinion could mention Euratom, the Joint Research Centre and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology.
bi v mnenju lahko omenili Euratom, Skupno raziskovalno središče in Evropski inštitut za inovacije.
The opinion could not be discussed and adopted at section level because of timing constraints.
Zaradi časovnega razporeda mnenja ni bilo mogoče obravnavati in sprejeti v strokovni skupini.
The opinion could put forward visionary but realistic proposals for concrete measures to make the transition from the current impasse to a future growth path.
V mnenju bi lahko predstavili vizionarske, a realistične predloge za konkretne ukrepe, ki bi pomagali premagati sedanji zastoj in napredovati po poti prihodnje rasti.
The Opinion critically explores the necessary requirements of such schemes to be effective, the adequacy of policy definition within the EU and the urgently required need for clarification and co-ordination.
Mnenje kritično preučuje potrebne zahteve za učinkovitost teh sistemov, njihovo ustrezno opredelitev znotraj politik EU ter nujno potrebna pojasnila in usklajevanje.