natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The opinion states that the various social inequalities are cumulative and that they foster the development of health inequalities; however, apart from an evaluation of Commission policies, the recommendations contained in the EESC opinion do not take account of this aspect at all.
V mnenju je omenjeno, da kumulativen učinek različnih družbenih neenakosti pospešuje razvoj neenakosti na področju zdravja, vendar pa EESO v svojih priporočilih zgolj ocenjuje politiko Komisije in tega vidika sploh ne upošteva.
The opinion states the EESC's intention to invite a broad spectrum of Ukrainian civil society to take part in the cooperation process and to include also those who remain sceptical or hostile to recent political transition and rapprochement with the EU, ensuring that no important and representative organisation is overlooked.
EESO v mnenju navaja, da namerava k sodelovanju povabiti široko paleto ukrajinske civilne družbe, pri tem pa želi zajeti tudi tiste, ki ostajajo zadržani ali sovražni do nedavne politične tranzicije in zbliževanja z EU, ter pri tem zagotoviti, da nobena pomembna in predstavniška organizacija ne bo spregledana.
The opinion strengthens the Committee's input into the Europe 2020 strategy, especially the "Innovation Union"2 and "Agenda for New Skills for New Jobs"3 initiatives and promoting the quality of work and lifelong learning4.
Mnenje povečuje prispevek Odbora k strategiji Evropa 2020, zlasti k pobudama "Unija inovacij"2 in "Nova znanja in spretnosti za nova delovna mesta"3, hkrati pa spodbuja kakovost dela in vseživljenjsko učenje4.
The opinion stressed that the development of an entrepreneurial mindset is an ongoing learning process, and should therefore be included on curricula.
Mnenje je poudarilo, da je razvoj podjetniške miselnosti stalni proces in da ga je zato treba vključiti v učne načrte.
The opinion stressed the importance of common definitions and systems for recognition, notably as regards occupational and commuting accidents, occupational illnesses caused by working conditions and/or exposure to dangerous substances at the workplace, and work-related accidents causing incapacity and invalidity.
V mnenju je poudarjen pomen skupnih opredelitev in sistemov priznavanja v zvezi z nesrečami pri delu in prevozu na delo, poklicnimi boleznimi, nastalimi zaradi delovnih razmer in/ali zaradi izpostavljenosti nevarnim snovem na delovnem mestu, ter nesreč, ki so povezane z delom in povzročajo nezmožnost za delo in invalidnost.
The opinion stressed three fundamental human rights which preconditioned other rights: the right to information, to free and informed consent and to dignity.
Mnenje je poudarilo tri temeljne pravice, ki so predpogoj za druge pravice: pravico do obveščenosti, pravico do proste privolitve na podlagi pojasnitve in pravico do dostojanstva.
The opinion stresses that the AA should be ambitious and should deal with all aspects of the EU's relations with Mercosur.
Mnenje poudarja, da bi moral biti sporazum o partnerstvu ambiciozen in zajemati vse vidike odnosov med EU in Mercosurjem.
The opinion stresses that the EU needs to hold up its credibility both internally and externally, when it comes to implementing the Agenda and its 17 goals.
V mnenju je poudarjeno, da mora EU pri izvajanju agende in njenih 17 ciljev ohraniti svojo verodostojnost.
The opinion stresses the following points:
Odbor poudarja naslednje:
The opinion stresses the following points:
V mnenju je poudarjeno naslednje:
The opinion stresses the importance of including disasters caused by cumulative effects or consequences of long-term situations.
Mnenje poudarja pomen vključitve nesreč, do katerih pride zaradi učinkov kopičenja ali posledic dolgotrajnih razmer.
The opinion stresses the importance of services of general interest operating in non-urban areas, in order to guarantee the EU's social and territorial cohesion.
Mnenje poudarja pomen storitev splošnega pomena v zunajmestnih območjih za zagotavljanje socialne in teritorialne kohezije EU.
The opinion subsequently argued that systems for informing and consulting consumers needed to be strengthened vis-à-vis the Commission and the consumer authorities in the Member States.
Poleg tega morajo tako Komisija kot nacionalni organi, pristojni za potrošnike, izboljšati sisteme obveščanja potrošnikov in posvetovanja z njimi.
The opinion suggests a contradiction and a more straightforward statement on the equality between economic freedoms and works rights would have been welcome;
Mnenje vsebuje protislovje, bolj jasna izjava o enakosti ekonomskih svoboščin in delavskih pravic pa bi bila zaželena;
The opinion suggests that a European Indebtedness Observatory be set up to monitor developments in the phenomenon at European level, providing a forum for dialogue between all the parties concerned, and proposing and coordinating measures to prevent and limit it, then assessing the impact thereof.
Poleg tega se predlaga vzpostavitev evropske opazovalne skupine za zadolženost, ki bi spremljala razvoj pojava na evropski ravni, delovala kot forum za dialog med vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi ter predlagala, usklajevala in ocenjevala ukrepe za njegovo preprečevanje in omejevanje.
The opinion suggests that the Commission should present a very detailed report on this phenomenon and this objective, not least since 2008 has been designated the year of intercultural dialogue.
Mnenje predlaga, da Komisija, zlasti ob priložnosti leta 2008, ki bo leto medkulturnega dialoga, predstavi zelo podrobno poročilo o tem pojavu in cilju.
The Opinion supports an idea referred to in the European Commission's report of the Task Force on Northern Ireland to establish an EU facility for Conflict Resolution.
Mnenje podpira zamisel iz poročila projektne skupine Evropske komisije za Severno Irsko o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za reševanje konfliktov.
The opinion supports the Commission's commitment to stepping up innovation, research and development and improving skills, and puts forward, as an example, the ULCOS project (Ultra Low CO2 Steelmaking), part of the Steel Technology Platform (ESTEP).
Mnenje podpira zavezanost Komisije k okrepitvi inovacij, raziskav in razvoja ter izboljšanju usposobljenosti in kot primer navaja projekt ULCOS (izdelava jekla z ultra nizkimi emisijami CO2) v okviru evropske tehnološke platforme za jeklo (ESTEP).
The opinion supports the Commission's communication and puts forward additional measures to ensure a level playing field for this industry.
Mnenje podpira sporočilo Komisije in predlaga dodatne ukrepe za zagotovitev enakih konkurenčnih pogojev v tej industriji.
The opinion supports the external dimension of EU social security coordination set out in the Commission's Communication and complementarity between national and EU approaches.
Mnenje podpira zunanjo razsežnost pravil o koordinaciji v zvezi s socialno varnostjo iz sporočila Komisije in se zavzema za komplementarnost nacionalnih pristopov in pristopa EU.
The opinion supports the proposals set out in the Commission's Communication and complementarity between national and EU approaches.
EESO podpira predloge iz sporočila Komisije in komplementarnost nacionalnih pristopov ter pristopa EU.
The opinion tackles issues that are common for all civil society in Ukraine, e.g., concerning better legislation, thus there is no division between different kinds of NGOs and social dialogue is regarded as part of civil dialogue.
Mnenje se loteva vprašanj, ki so skupna celotni civilni družbi v Ukrajini, na primer v zvezi z boljšo zakonodajo, kar pomeni, da ni nikakršnih razhajanj med različnimi vrstami nevladnih organizacij, socialni dialog pa velja za sestavni del civilnega dialoga.
The opinion takes into account the EESC experience in development cooperation, the work of the Sustainable Development Observatory (SDO) and the contributions to the EU consultations carried out by the European Commission, Directorate General for Development and Cooperation Towards a post 2015 Development Framework and the Directorate General for the Environment Ensuring Sustainable Development Globally: EU Follow Up to Rio+20.
V mnenju so upoštevane izkušnje EESO na področju razvojnega sodelovanja, delo opazovalne skupine za trajnostni razvoj in prispevki k posvetovanju EU na temo Okviru za sodelovanje po letu 2015 naproti, ki ga je izvedel generalni direktorat Evropske komisije za razvoj in sodelovanje, in posvetovanju na temo Zagotavljanje trajnostnega razvoja na svetovni ravni: nadaljnji ukrepi EU po konferenci Rio+20, ki ga je izvedel generalni direktorat za okolje.
The opinion takes stock of the current situation of civil society in Serbia (legal environment, relations with the authorities, situation of social and civil dialogues) and proposes recommendations for possible EU action in this field.
Mnenje vsebuje oceno trenutnega položaja civilne družbe v Srbiji (pravno okolje, odnosi z oblastmi, stanje socialnega in civilnega dialoga) in predlagana priporočila za možne ukrepe EU na tem področju.
The opinion TEN/349 was adopted at the plenary session in December 2008.
Mnenje TEN/349 je bilo sprejeto na plenarnem zasedanju decembra 2008.
The opinion then was put to the vote and adopted by 66 votes to 1 with 4 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 66 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion therefore concluded that it was essential to integrate the gender dimension in a systematic way in the National Reform Plans (NRP) and the European Semester for efficacy and control purposes.
Zato zaključuje, da je treba zaradi učinkovitosti in nadzora vidik spola sistematično vključiti v nacionalne programe reform in evropski semester.
The opinion therefore proposed a holistic approach to the financing of pension systems, including smart and fair measures to prolong working life beyond pension age.
V mnenju je zato predlagan celovit pristop k financiranju pokojninskih sistemov, vključno s pametnimi in poštenimi ukrepi za podaljšanje delovne dobe prek upokojitvene starosti.
The opinion therefore proposed the deepening of relations between European and Japanese civil society organisations.
V mnenju je zato predlagana poglobitev odnosov med organizacijami evropske in japonske civilne družbe.
The opinion therefore proposes launching a new cultural debate on culture, particularly since the current debate still appears to be excessively fixated on issues of patrimony and on conserving heritage rather than on creativity, ongoing processes, and new departures of the imagination; nor does the debate yet reflect the cultural ferment characteristic of social, economic and environmental developments.
Predlaga, da se začne nova razprava o kulturi, saj se zdi, da kultura še vedno preveč trdno temelji na patriotskih konceptih in ohranjanju dediščine ter premalo na konceptih ustvarjanja, razvoja in novih zamisli ter še zmeraj premalo poudarja kulturno razsežnost socialnega, gospodarskega in ekološkega razvoja.
The opinion therefore urges that all possible formulae and mechanisms be used to that end (countervailing clauses, transitional clauses, exceptions, promotion of investments, development etc).
Zato poziva, da se v ta namen uporabijo vse metode in mehanizmi (kompenzacijski, prehodni, izjeme, spodbujanje naložb, razvoj itd.).
The opinion thus amended was adopted by 143 votes to seven with 10 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 143 glasovi za, 7 glasovi proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was adopted by 147 votes with one abstention.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 147 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion thus amended was adopted by 163 votes to 1, with 6 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 163 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was adopted by 168 votes to 3 with 8 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 168 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was put to a vote and adopted by the assembly by 100 votes to 5 with 2 abstentions.
Spremenjeno mnenje je skupščina sprejela s 100 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 2 vzdržanima glasoma.
The opinion thus amended was put to a vote and adopted by the assembly by 122 votes to 23 with 45 abstentions.
Skupščina je tako spremenjeno mnenje sprejela s 122 glasovi za, 23 glasovi proti in 45 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was put to a vote and adopted by the assembly by 179 votes to one with three abstentions.
Spremenjeno mnenje je skupščina sprejela s 179 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was put to the vote and adopted by 128 votes to 1, with 4 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 128 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was put to the vote and adopted by 158 votes to eight with 12 abstentions.
Spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 158 glasovi za, 8 glasovi proti in 12 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was put to the vote and adopted by 187 votes to seven, with 15 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 187 glasovi za, 7 glasovi proti in 15 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was put to the vote and adopted unanimously.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto soglasno.
The opinion thus amended was put to the vote and was adopted by 137 votes in favour, 22 against with 15 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 137 glasovi za, 22 glasovi proti in 15 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended was put to the vote and was adopted by 152 votes to 1, with 3 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 152 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus amended, was put to the vote and was adopted by 138 votes in favour, 3 against and with no abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 138 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in brez vzdržanih glasov.
The opinion thus modified was adopted by 79 votes, with 2 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto z 79 glasovi za in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion thus modified was put to the vote and was adopted by 158 votes for, with two against and four abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 158 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus modified was put to the vote and was adopted by 168 votes to 21, with 13 abstentions.
Tako spremenjeno mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 168 glasovi za, 21 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion thus modified was put to vote and adopted by 167 votes to two, with one abstention.
Spremenjeno mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 167 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion tries to understand why the Euro is still criticised by parts the public, search for the reasons and, where possible, propose solutions.
Poiskati skuša odgovore in, kjer je mogoče, predlagati rešitve.
The opinion underlines the new holistic approach which closely connects it with the other flagship initiatives and the five EU headline targets.
Mnenje poudarja nov celosten pristop, ki ga tesno povezuje z drugimi vodilnimi pobudami in petimi glavnimi cilji EU.
The opinion underlines the new holistic approach which closely connects it with the other flagship initiatives and the five EU headline targets.
Mnenje poudarja nov celosten pristop, ki ga tesno povezuje z drugimi vodilnimi pobudami in petimi krovnimi cilji EU.
The opinion urges the EU to do everything possible to ensure that:
EESO poziva EU, naj stori vse potrebno, da:
The opinion was a subject of the thematic debate on the Lisbon Strategy and economic growth.
Mnenje je bilo predmet tematske razprave o lizbonski strategiji in gospodarski rasti.
The opinion was actually being adopted during the "European Year for combating poverty and social exclusion" and several weeks before the major biennial conference, being held by the EESC in Florence from 20 to 22 May, on Education for combating social exclusion.
Dejansko je bilo mnenje sprejeto v letu, ki je bilo razglašeno za evropsko leto boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti, in le nekaj tednov pred veliko bienalno konferenco o izobraževanju za boj proti socialni izključenosti, ki jo bo EESO organiziral od 20. do 22. maja 2010 v Firencah.
The opinion was adopted as amended by 169 votes to 2 with 15 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 169 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 15 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted at the February plenary session.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto na plenarnem zasedanju februarja 2010.
The opinion was adopted by ... votes to ... with ... abstentions …
Barata Triguera za glavnega poročevalca ter s/z glasovi za …, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi sprejel naslednje mnenje.
The opinion was adopted by 100 to five with two abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 100 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion was adopted by 100 votes for, one against and three abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 100 glasovi za, 1 proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 100 votes in favour, 1 vote against and 9 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 100 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 100 votes to 2 with 2 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 100 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion was adopted by 100 votes to 4, with 7 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 100 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 100 votes to one, with three abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 100 glasovi za, 1 proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 101 votes and 1 abstention.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 101 glasom za, nobenim proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 101 votes to one.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 101 glasom za in 1 glasom proti.
The opinion was adopted by 101 votes, with 1 abstention.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 101 glasom za in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes in favour, with four abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovoma za in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes to 0 with four abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovi za, nobenim glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes to 1 with 4 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes to 16 with 28 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovi za, 16 glasovi proti in 28 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes to 2, with 7 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovoma za, 2 glasovoma proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes to five, with 48 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovoma za, 5 glasovi proti in 48 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes to one, with four abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovi za, 1 proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes to seven, with six abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovi za, 7 glasovi proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes to three, with five abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 102 votes, no votes against and with 4 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 102 glasovoma za, nobenim glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 103 votes to 19 with 11 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 103 glasovi za, 19 proti in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 103 votes to 19, with 11 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 103 glasovi za, 19 glasovi proti in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 103 votes to 22, with 18 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto S 103 glasovi za, 22 proti in 18 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 103 votes to one, with no abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 103 glasovi za, 1 proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 103 votes to one, with six abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto z 103 glasovi za, 1 proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 103 votes to one, with three abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 103 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 103 votes with two abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 103 glasovi za in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion was adopted by 104 votes in favour with 1 abstention.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 104 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 104 votes to 1 with 5 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 104 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 104 votes to 4, with 9 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 104 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 104 votes to none, with 1 abstention.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 104 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 104 votes to three, with one abstention.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 104 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 104 votes to three, with one abstention.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto z 104 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 104 votes, with 2 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 104 glasovi za in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion was adopted by 104 votes, with 3 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 104 glasovi za in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes in favour, with two abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes to 0 with 0 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes to 1, with 5 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za, enim glasom proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes to four, with five abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za, 4 glasovi  proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes to four, with five abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes to one, with five abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za, 1 proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes to three, with eight abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes to three, with eight abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za, 3 proti in 8 vzdržanimi.
The opinion was adopted by 105 votes, with no votes against and two abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes in favour, with 1 abstention.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes to 2, with 1 abstention.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes to 21, with 28 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za, 21 glasovi proti in 28 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes to 26 with 8 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za, 26 glasovi proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes to 3, with no abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za in 3 proti.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes to 32, with 20 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za, 32 glasovi proti in 20 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes to none, with one abstention.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes to two, with 30 abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 30 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The opinion was adopted by 106 votes, with 1 abstention.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 106 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom.