natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Evaluator recommends that mechanisms should be explored to publicise the Jean Monnet brand more widely both within and outside the EU, as a means to increase student and public recognition.
Ocenjevalec priporoča, da je treba raziskati mehanizme za širšo promocijo zaščitne znamke Jean Monnet v EU in zunaj nje kot sredstvo za povečanje njenega ugleda med študenti in širšo javnostjo.
The Evaluator specifically recommends encouraging CIFE to undertake a more systematic analysis of the objectives and coherence of its different activities, as a basis for more informed consideration of whether some activities could be "streamlined" to increase focus.
Ocenjevalec izrecno priporoča spodbujanje CIFE, da opravi bolj sistematično analizo ciljev in usklajenosti svojih različnih dejavnosti, kot podlago za bolj osveščen razmislek o tem, ali bi bilo nekatere dejavnosti mogoče „poenostaviti“, da bi povečali osredotočenost.
The evaluator states a strong case for requiring a minimum level of financial input from all co-organisers as a means of ensuring a solid level of commitment.9
Ocenjevalec se strinja z zahtevo po minimalnem prispevku vseh soorganizatorjev, saj to zagotavlja trdno zavezanost9.
The evaluator suggests that there needs to be a better fit between the modest programme budget and the breath of its stated aims; whilst the remit of the programme was challenging and very wide, its resources – by comparison - were limited.
Ocenjevalec meni, da je treba skromen proračun programa in zastavljene cilje bolje uskladiti; vzpostavitev programa je predstavljala velik izziv in je bila zelo obsežna, sredstva programa pa so bila v primerjavi s tem omejena.
The evaluator then carried out an in-depth analysis of these data in order to answer the evaluation questions, following a triangulation process which involved cross-referencing all the data collected.
Ocenjevalec je nato te podatke temeljito analiziral, da bi odgovoril na vprašanja ocenjevanja, pri čemer je uporabil t. i. postopek triangulacije, ki vključuje navzkrižno primerjanje vseh zbranih podatkov.
The Evaluator underlines the great relevance of the EIUC as a unique network that draws together Europe's leading human rights experts from a large number of academic organisations and offers a variety of perspectives that no single faculty can provide.
Ocenjevalec poudarja velik pomen EIUC kot edinstvene mreže, ki povezuje vodilne evropske strokovnjake s področja človekovih pravic iz številnih akademskih organizacij in ponuja različne možnosti, ki jih ne more zagotoviti nobena posamezna fakulteta.
The Evaluator underlines the high relevance of the Jean Monnet Action in promoting understanding and debate about the EU (in line with the Commission's priority in the field of Communication and Plan D) and in boosting the EU's visibility in candidate and third countries, while helping educational capacity-building in the field.
Ocenjevalec poudarja velik pomen akcije Jean Monnet pri spodbujanju razumevanja in razprav o EU (v skladu s prednostno nalogo Skupnosti na področju komunikacije in načrta D) ter povečanju prepoznavnosti EU v državah kandidatkah in tretjih državah, ob istočasni pomoči graditve izobraževalne zmogljivosti na tem področju.
The evaluator's conclusions are that Culture 2000 was fully complementary to other EU and national/regional cultural programmes and did not duplicate activities undertaken elsewhere through other such programmes.
Ocenjevalec je ugotovil, da je bila Kultura 2000 povsem komplementarna drugim programom EU in nacionalnim/regionalnim kulturnim programom ter ni podvajala dejavnosti drugih takšnih programov.
The evaluator's conclusions show that small improvements could be made in a limited number of specific areas and that, in general, participants are satisfied with the programme and recognise its unique European added value.
Sklepne ugotovitve ocenjevalca kažejo, da je mogoče doseči manjše izboljšave pri omejenem številu posebnih področij ter da so na splošno udeleženci zadovoljni s programom in mu priznavajo edinstveno evropsko dodano vrednost.
The evaluator's conclusions show that, even if there is room for improvement in some areas, participants have nevertheless proved to be satisfied with the programme and recognise its European added value.
Ugotovitev ocenjevalca kaže, da so bili udeleženci zadovoljni s programom in so mu priznali evropsko dodano vrednost, četudi bi bilo mogoče nekatera področja izboljšati.
The Evaluator's findings
4.2.1. Ugotovitve ocenjevalca
The Evaluator's findings
Ugotovitve ocenjevalca
The Evaluator's Findings and Recommendations on Action 1 – Support for specified Institutions
Ugotovitve ocenjevalca in priporočila o akciji 1 – Podpora posebnim ustanovam
The Evaluator's Findings and Recommendations on Action 2 – Support for European Associations active in Education and Training
Ugotovitve ocenjevalca in priporočila o akciji 2 – Podpora evropskim združenjem, ki so aktivna na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja
The Evaluator's Findings and Recommendations on Action 3A – the Jean Monnet Action
Ugotovitve ocenjevalca in priporočila o akciji 3A – Akcija Jean Monnet
The Evaluator's Findings and Recommendations on Action 3B – Support for the Open method of Coordination in Education
Ugotovitve ocenjevalca in priporočila o akciji 3B – Podpora odprti metodi usklajevanja in izobraževanja
The Evaluator's Findings and Recommendations on Action 3C – Training for National Judges
Ugotovitve ocenjevalca in priporočila o akciji 3C – Usposabljanje nacionalnih sodnikov
The evaluator's general conclusion on efficiency is that the programme has mostly met expectations in terms of participation by type of organisation and geographical balance.
Splošna sklepna ugotovitev ocenjevalca glede učinkovitosti je, da je program večinoma izpolnil pričakovanja glede udeležbe po vrsti organizacije in geografskega ravnovesja.
The Evaluator's main recommendation and the Commission's comments
8.2. Glavno priporočilo ocenjevalca in pripombe Komisije
The Evaluator's main recommendation and the Commission's comments
Glavno priporočilo ocenjevalca in pripombe Komisije
The Evaluator's main recommendations and the Commission's comments
4.1.2. Glavna priporočila ocenjevalca in pripombe Komisije
The Evaluator's main recommendations and the Commission's comments
4.2.2. Glavna priporočila ocenjevalca in pripombe Komisije
The Evaluator's main recommendations and the Commission's comments
4.3.2. Glavna priporočila ocenjevalca in pripombe Komisije
The Evaluator's main recommendations and the Commission's comments
7.2. Glavna priporočila ocenjevalca in pripombe Komisije
The Evaluator's main recommendations and the Commission's comments
Glavna priporočila ocenjevalca in pripombe Komisije
The evaluators addressed eleven recommendations to the Commission and six to Member States.
Ocenjevalci so obravnavali enajst priporočil Komisiji in šest priporočil državam članicam.
The Evaluators advise to hold more targeted and themed information days so as to attract new applicants and, in particular more applicants from the new Member States.
Ocenjevalci svetujejo organizacijo bolj usmerjenih in tematskih informativnih dnevov za pritegnitev novih prosilcev in zlasti več prosilcev iz novih držav članic.
The evaluators also addressed a series of recommendations that require action either by the Commission or by the ETF itself.
Ocenjevalci so obravnavali tudi številna priporočila, ki zahtevajo ukrepe bodisi s strani Komisije ali same ETF.
The evaluators also addressed six recommendations to Member States, given that lead responsibility for many of the policies concerned lies at national, or in some cases regional and local, level.
Ocenjevalci so obravnavali tudi šest priporočil držav članic, glede na to, ga je glavna odgovornost za veliko zadevnih politik na nacionalni ravni, v nekaterih primerih pa tudi na regionalni in lokalni ravni.
The Evaluators also consider that an extra-effort should be made to improve further the quality of submitted proposals and reduce the evaluation workload, and recommend continuing the development of better guidance to applicants.
Ocenjevalci menijo tudi, da je treba dodaten trud vložiti v nadaljnje izboljšanje kakovosti predloženih predlogov in zmanjšati delovno obremenitev pri oceni, ter predlagajo nadaljnji razvoj boljšega vodenja za prosilce.
The evaluators also noted that rigidity and unnecessary institutionalisation should be avoided and that greater flexibility should be introduced where possible.
Opozorili so tudi, da se je treba izogibati togosti in nepotrebni institucionalizaciji ter da je treba povsod, kjer je to mogoče, uvesti več prilagodljivosti.
The evaluators also noted that there was potential to achieve greater impact, through stronger connections with and better information-sharing channels between OMC participants and key decision-makers at national level.
Navedli so tudi, da je z močnejšimi povezavami in boljšimi kanali za izmenjavo informacij med udeleženci OMK ter ključnimi oblikovalci politik na nacionalni ravni mogoče doseči še večji učinek.
The evaluators also perceive Cedefop to be playing a complementary role with other agencies, and found evidence of Cedefop being aware of the need to guard against duplication and taking active steps to be clear as to respective functions.
Ocenjevalci menijo, da ima Cedefop dopolnilno vlogo v odnosu do drugih agencij, in ugotovili so, da se zaveda potrebe po izogibanju podvajanja ter da sprejema konkretne ukrepe za razjasnitev funkcij posameznih agencij.
The evaluators and the discussion with MS have highlighted the following critical issues for further action: a) the issue of convertibility of blank firing weapons (such as alarm guns) into real firearms, b) the need to clarify requirements for the marking of firearms (allowing their traceability), c) the need for common and stringent guidelines for the deactivation of firearms, d) the need to clarify definitions e) the need to consider internet selling arrangements, f) the need to streamline and improve the national data-exchange systems and explore the possibilities for interoperability and g) the need to strengthen data collection activities related to civilian firearms and related criminal offences to support appropriately future decision-making processes at EU level.
Izvajalci vrednotenja in države članice med razpravo so izpostavili naslednja kritična vprašanja za nadaljnje ukrepanje: (a) vprašanje možnosti predelave orožja, namenjenega streljanju s slepimi naboji (kot so plašilne pištole), v pravo strelno orožje, (b) potreba po pojasnitvi zahtev za označevanje strelnega orožja (ki bi omogočalo njegovo sledljivost), (c) potreba po skupnih in strogih smernicah za onesposobitev strelnega orožja, (d) potreba po pojasnitvi opredelitev pojmov, (e) potreba po preučitvi ureditev spletne prodaje, (f) potreba po racionalizaciji in izboljšanju nacionalnih sistemov za izmenjavo podatkov in preučitvi možnosti za interoperabilnost ter (g) potreba po okrepitvi dejavnosti zbiranja podatkov, ki se nanašajo na strelno orožje za civilno uporabo in povezana kazniva dejanja, da bi zagotovili ustrezno podporo za prihodnje postopke odločanja na ravni EU.
The evaluators argued for some increased flexibility in the ETF’s geographical scope, as this would allow its particular expertise to be used by the Commission in countries which are at comparable stages of development and facing similar socio-economic challenges.
Ocenjevalci so se zavzemali za večjo prožnost v zvezi z geografskim območjem ETF, saj bi to Komisiji omogočalo, da posebno strokovno znanje ETF uporabi v državah, ki so na primerljivi razvojni ravni in se soočajo s podobnimi družbeno-gospodarskimi izzivi.
The evaluators come to very positive conclusions on a number of aspects regarding the relevance, complementarity and added value of YiA, its effectiveness and its efficiency.
Ocenjevalci so prišli do zelo pozitivnih ugotovitev v zvezi s številnimi vidiki, ki zadevajo ustreznost, dopolnjevalno in dodano vrednost PMvA, njegovo učinkovitost in uspešnost.
The evaluators conclude that a fully decentralised approach would have risked reducing the impact of the communication campaign of the Year and that the "dual approach" was the most appropriate one, combining a European-level campaign and flagship projects with a degree of decentralisation.
Ocenjevalci zaključujejo, da bi popolnoma decentraliziran pristop lahko pomenil zmanjšanje učinka kampanje obveščanja o Evropskem letu in da je bil „dvojni pristop“ najbolj primeren, saj je kampanjo na evropski ravni in vodilne projekte združeval z ravnijo decentralizacije.
The evaluators conclude that, although the Board does fulfil its primary role, there are questions regarding its effective role in strategic decision making.
Ocenjevalci so sklenili, da odbor sicer opravlja svojo glavno vlogo, vendar se zastavljajo vprašanja v zvezi z njegovo dejansko vlogo pri strateškem odločanju.
The evaluators concluded that the Agreements are highly relevant in responding to a set of needs that are important and increasingly significant: globalisation and the parallel process of internationalisation in education.
Ocenjevalci so ugotovili, da sta sporazuma zelo ustrezna glede na vrsto potreb, ki so pomembne in vse tehtnejše: globalizacija in vzporedno potekajoči proces internacionalizacije izobraževanja.
The evaluators concluded that the benefits and impacts of the OMC mainly related to mutual learning, best practice exchanges, and building European knowledge networks on specific cultural topics.
Ugotovili so, da so koristi in učinki OMK povezani predvsem z vzajemnim učenjem, izmenjavo dobre prakse in razvojem evropskih mrež znanja o posebnih kulturnih vsebinah.
The evaluators concluded that the ETF’s thematic remit limiting it to VET is too restrictive and, although it has been interpreted over the last years with some flexibility by both the Commission and the ETF, they recommended that the revision of the ETF founding Regulation should define the ETF's role on the basis that VET is one part of a wider programme of Human Resources Development (HRD).
Ocenjevalci menijo, da tematska pristojnost ETF, omejena na področje poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja, preozka in čeprav sta jo tako Komisija kot ETF v preteklih letih razlagali dokaj prožno, so priporočili, da mora revizija Uredbe o ustanovitvi vlogo ETF opredeliti tako, da bo poklicno izobraževanje in usposabljanje del širšega programa na področju razvoja človeških virov.
The evaluators concluded that there is a strong continuation of partnerships formed under the Agreements: half of the project partners and coordinators maintain contacts after completing their projects, and three quarters of the Schuman-Fulbright grantees continue to cooperate with colleagues from their host institutions, usually in research activities.
Ocenjevalci so sklenili, da se partnerstva, ustvarjena na podlagi sporazumov, v veliki meri nadaljujejo: polovica projektnih partnerjev in koordinatorjev ohranja stike po zaključku projektov in tri četrtine štipendistov Schuman-Fulbright še naprej sodeluje s kolegi iz ustanov gostiteljic, običajno pri raziskovalnih dejavnostih.
The evaluators consider Modinis successful in providing European value added to Member States' activities, in particular through the benchmarking activities, but also through conferences and the preparation for ENISA.
Ocenjevalci menijo, da je Modinis dejavnostim držav članic zagotovil dodano evropsko vrednost, zlasti s primerjalno analizo, konferencami in pripravami na ENISA.
The evaluators consider that accompanying measures effectively support the professional development of youth workers, e.g. greater involvement in European networks.
Ocenjevalci menijo, da so podporni ukrepi učinkoviti pri strokovnem razvoju „mladinskih delavcev“: večja udeležba v evropskih omrežjih
The evaluators consider that activity based budgeting started to be implemented towards the end of the evaluation period and that measured performance indicators were only comprehensively available for the first time in 2005, which allowed making partial comparability observations between 2005 and 2006.
Ocenjevalci menijo, da se je proračun na podlagi dejavnosti začel izvajati proti koncu ocenjevalnega obdobja in da so bili kazalniki za merjenje učinkovitosti prvič v celoti na voljo šele leta 2005, zato je bila za 2005–2006 možna le delna primerjava.
The evaluators consider that the grants helped to increase the credibility and visibility of the NGOs and the EYF in the eyes of their members and potential sponsors, but it is difficult to tell whether this has improved their image vis-à-vis young people in general.
Ocenjevalci ocenjujejo, da so subvencije prispevale k povečanju verodostojnosti in prepoznavnosti nevladnih organizacij in EFM pri njihovih članih in njihovih potencialnih donatorjih, vendar ni jasno, če je to izboljšalo njihovo podobo pri mladih na splošno.
The Evaluators consider that there is very strong evidence of the need for the programme and recommend its extension beyond 2006 with a larger scope and budget in order to achieve mass replication of best practice and attract new applicants and key actors.
Ocenjevalci menijo, da obstajajo zelo močni dokazi o tem, da je program potreben, in priporočajo njegovo podaljšanje po letu 2006 z večjim obsegom in proračunom za dosego množične razširitve najboljše prakse ter pritegnitev novih prosilcev in ključnih akterjev.
The evaluators consider that ‘there is no problem with this, of course, so long as the level of resources can sustain it and where the pool of competency in the organisation can span both.’
Ocenjevalci menijo, da „s tem ni težav, dokler seveda to dopuščajo viri in tam, kjer znanje v organizaciji omogoča oboje.“
The evaluators consider that, while Action 4 has supported some interesting and potentially effective projects, the funding for the Action was too thinly dispersed among many projects with differing objectives.
Ocenjevalci menijo, da je akcija 4 sicer podprla nekatere zanimive in potencialno učinkovite projekte, vendar so bila sredstva za akcijo preveč razpršena med številne projekte z različnimi cilji.
The evaluators consider the programme has achieved a generally high degree of efficiency.
Ocenjevalci menijo, da je program na splošno dosegel visoko stopnjo uspešnosti.
The evaluators consider, however, that the quality of consolidated monitoring data for the programme could be improved without considerable additional effort.
Vendar pa ocenjevalci menijo, da bi se lahko kakovost konsolidiranih podatkov o spremljanju programa izboljšala brez večjih dodatnih naporov.
The evaluators considered it a fundamental prerequisite for the FAS that EU farmers should have access to the advice on a voluntary basis, since following advice is by its very nature voluntary — in contrast with compulsory control/certification systems.
Po mnenju ocenjevalcev je eden temeljnih pogojev sistema kmetijskega svetovanja, da imajo kmetje EU prostovoljen dostop do svetovanja, saj je upoštevanje nasveta že po naravi prostovoljno – v nasprotju s sistemi obveznih kontrol in certificiranja.
The evaluators considered that the horizontal elements of the programme response to this need were of sufficient quality but not of sufficient quantity.
Ocenjevalci so menili, da so bili horizontalni elementi odziva programa na te potrebe dovolj kakovostni, vendar količinsko nezadostni.
The evaluators considered that the value of networking between projects had not been sufficiently recognised and that dissemination and concertation activities at programme level had been insufficient.
Ocenjevalci so menili, da pomembnost mrežnega povezovanja projektov ni bila dovolj prepoznana ter da so bile dejavnosti razširjanja in usklajevanja na programski ravni nezadostne.
The evaluators considered that this offers useful and directly applicable lessons for the eContent Plus programme and to the CIP ICT Policy Support Programme (CIP-ICT).
Poleg tega so menili, da to ponuja koristna in neposredno uporabna spoznanja za program e-Vsebine Plus in za Program za spodbujanje IKT Okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (PKI-IKT).
The evaluators contacted: MS authorities; representatives of firearms producers, dealers and brokers; firearms users including hunters and marksmen; international bodies, associations, research institutes and other experts.
Izvajalci vrednotenja so se obrnili na: organe držav članic; predstavnike proizvajalcev strelnega orožja, trgovcev in posrednikov za strelno orožje; uporabnike strelnega orožja, vključno z lovci in športnimi strelci; mednarodne organe, združenja, raziskovalne inštitute in druge izvedence.
The evaluators distinguished between three sets of objectives for the Year:
Ocenjevalci so razlikovali med tremi sklopi ciljev za Evropsko leto:
The evaluators examined the following five criteria, around which the present report is also structured: relevance; external coherence; efficiency; effectiveness; sustainability.
Ocenjevalci so preverili naslednjih pet meril, na katerih temelji tudi to poročilo: pomembnost; zunanja skladnost; učinkovitost; uspešnost; trajnost.
The evaluators found it challenging to assess the specific results and impacts achieved by ETF given the nature of the sector, the scale of ETF’s activities and the range of different stakeholders.
Ocenjevalci menijo, da je bilo ocenjevanje posebnih rezultatov in učinkov, ki jih je EFU dosegla, velik izziv, če se upoštevajo narava sektorja, obseg dejavnosti EFU in številne različne zainteresirane strani.
The evaluators found that Cedefop’s activities evoke good feedback across the board.
Ocenjevalci so ugotovili, da so povratne informacije o dejavnostih Cedefopa na splošno pozitivne.
The evaluators found that ETF delivers a focused set of services with clear policy objectives, articulated in the Mid Term Perspective and Work Programme Planning documents, which vary by region according to EU external relations policy priorities.
Ocenjevalci so ugotovili, da EFU nudi ciljno usmerjene storitve z jasnimi političnimi cilji, ki so določeni v srednjeročni perspektivi in dokumentih o načrtovanju programa dela ter se po regijah razlikujejo glede na prednostne naloge politike zunanjih odnosov EU.
The evaluators found that ETF’s own activities complemented Commission funded programmes, and contributed to greater efficiency in their implementation.
Ocenjevalci so ugotovili, da so lastne dejavnosti EFU dopolnjevale dejavnosti, ki jih je financirala Komisija, in povečale učinkovitost njihovega izvajanja.
The evaluators found that the Agreements have made contributions in respect of all their intended objectives, but have made less progress than anticipated in respect of providing opportunities for policy discussion and exchange, and in Canada, in the youth field.
Ocenjevalci so ugotovili, da sta sporazuma prispevala k vsem predvidenim ciljem, manj od pričakovanega pa sta dosegla pri zagotavljanju možnosti za razpravo o politiki in izmenjave v zvezi s tem ter v Kanadi na področju mladih.
The evaluators found that the eEurope 2005 Action Plan was an important factor helping to keep ICT on the political agenda at a time where interest in the subject was waning.
Ocenjevalci so prišli do zaključka, da je akcijski načrt eEurope 2005 pomemben dejavnik pri ohranjanju IKT na političnem dnevnem redu v času, ko zanimanje za to tematiko upada.
The evaluators found that the organisation and management of the OMC process had been efficient and the support offered by the Commission was considered very positive.
Ugotovili so, da sta bila organizacija in upravljanje procesa OMK učinkovita ter da je bilo mnenje o podpori Komisije zelo pozitivno.
The evaluators found that the Programme has been successful in achieving the objectives set out in the Programme Decision and in the annual work programmes adopted for its implementation.
Ocenjevalci so ugotovili, da je bil program uspešen pri doseganju ciljev, določenih v sklepu o programu in v letnih delovnih programih, sprejetih za njegovo izvedbo.
The evaluators found that the programme has been successful in achieving the stated objectives as set out in the original Programme Decision and in subsequent annual work programmes.
Ocenjevalci so ugotovili, da je program dosegel cilje, določene v prvotnem sklepu o programu in poznejših letnih delovnih programih.