natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Would it be fitting, under Articles 17, 20 and 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to set down the rights of consumers, businesses and all those with economic rights resulting from their economic activities in the market, including workers, as specific rules within Community free competition legislation?
Ali bi bilo treba pravice potrošnikov, podjetij in vseh oseb, ki imajo na podlagi svoje gospodarske dejavnosti na trgu gospodarske pravice, torej tudi delavcev, v skladu s členi 17, 20 in 38 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah v obliki posebnih predpisov ?
Would it be fitting, under Articles 17, 20 and 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to set down the rights of consumers, businesses and all those with economic rights resulting from their economic activities in the market, including workers, as specific rules within Community free competition legislation?
Ali bi bilo treba pravice potrošnikov, podjetij in vseh oseb, ki imajo na podlagi svoje gospodarske dejavnosti na trgu gospodarske pravice, torej tudi delavcev, v skladu s členi 17, 20 in 38 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah v obliki posebnih predpisov prenesti v zakonodajo Skupnosti o konkurenci?
Would it be possible to develop state aid rules that are more favourable to the environment, in particular by encouraging eco-innovation and productivity improvements?
Ali bi bilo možno razviti pravila državne pomoči, ki so bolj ugodna za okolje, zlasti s spodbujanjem ekološke inovativnosti in izboljšanjem produktivnosti?
Would it be possible to devolve implementing decisions to national or regional authorities within Community legislation on principles?
Ali bi bilo na podlagi zakonodaje Skupnosti o načelih odločanje o izvajanju mogoče prenesti na nacionalne ali regionalne organe?
Would it be preferable to accept a degree of flexibility, even giving the parties’ choice a role to play?
Ali je boljše sprejeti določeno prilagodljivost, kamor se šteje dodelitev vloge izbiri strank?
Would it be sufficient and appropriate to require that an initiative clearly state the subject-matter and objectives of the proposal on which the Commission is invited to act?
Ali bi zadoščalo in bi bilo primerno, da mora pobuda jasno določiti vsebino in cilje predloga, v zvezi s katerim se Komisijo poziva k ukrepanju?
Would it be useful to allow cases to be transferred from a court in one Member State to a court in another Member State in this respect?
Ali bi bilo koristno omogočiti prenos ene zadeve s sodišča ene države članice na sodišče druge države članice na tem področju?
Would it be useful to look beyond the "simple" technical harmonisation of copyright and related rights?
Kaj ne bi bilo treba preučiti razmer tako, da bi razmišljali dlje kot samo o "enostavni" tehnični uskladitvi avtorske in sorodnih pravic?
Would it not be a good idea to draw this point to the attention of the Commission so that it can be addressed in Article 4 of the proposal for a directive?
Mar ne bi morali pritegniti pozornost Komisije na to in doseči, da bi v členu 4 predloga direktive to upoštevala?
Would it not be more productive to develop rules based on the principle that only excluding efficient competitors constitutes an abuse?
Ali ne bi bilo treba, nasprotno, razviti pravila na osnovi načela, po katerem je le izključitev “uspešnih” konkurentov zlonamerna?
Would it not be more productive to develop rules based on the principle that only excluding efficient competitors constitutes an abuse?
Ali ne bi bilo treba, nasprotno, razviti pravila na osnovi načela, po katerem je le izključitev „uspešnih“ konkurentov zlonamerna?
Would it therefore be possible to imagine that succession‑related deeds issued in one Member State could serve as the basis for amending property registers in the other Member States without further formalities?
Ali lahko posledično premislimo, da so notarski akti, izvršeni na področju dedovanja v eni državi članici, podlaga za vpis sprememb brez drugih uradnih postopkov v zemljiško knjigo v drugih državah članicah?
would lay down minimum prescriptions, so that Member States are free to adopt or maintain provisions affording greater protection and some Member States could, on their own initiative, step up the level of protection provided nationally;
bi določila minimalna priporočila, tako da bi države članice lahko svobodno sprejele ali ohranile določbe o večji zaščiti, nekatere države članice pa bi na lastno pobudo lahko povečale stopnjo zaščite na nacionalni ravni;
would like studies to be carried out and published on the cost of non-Europe, highlighting duplication in national budgets.
meni, da bi bilo treba izvesti in objaviti oceno stroškov , ki bi nastali, če EU ne bi bilo, iz katere bi bila razvidna nepotrebna dvojna uporaba virov v nacionalnih proračunih.
would like the guidelines to provide explicitly for all aspects of the delegations to be clearly defined (objectives, content, scope and duration),
želi, da bi bilo v smernicah izrecno predvideno, da se opredelijo vsi elementi prenosa pooblastila (cilji, vsebina, obseg in trajanje);
would like to draw attention to the costs of running and maintaining ERI once initial investment has been completed.
želi posebej opozoriti na stroške obratovanja in vzdrževanja ERI po končani začetni investiciji.
would like to see a generalisation of impact evaluations and possibly a lowering of the EUR 150 million average annual budget threshold currently set by the General Block Exemption Regulation as a limit.
poziva k splošni uvedbi ocen učinka in morebitnemu znižanju praga v višini 150 milijonov EUR za povprečni letni proračun shem pomoči, ki je trenutno v uredbi o splošnih skupinskih izjemah naveden kot meja;
would like to see greater emphasis placed on socially responsible investment and proposes the establishment of an observatory to monitor long-term investment conditions;
izraža željo, da bi se družbeno odgovornim naložbam posvečala večja pozornost, ter predlaga ustanovitev organa za spremljanje pogojev za dolgoročne naložbe;
would like to see more detailed assessments of the impact on the EU and Member States governments’ budgets;
pričakuje natančnejšo oceno učinka na proračun EU in proračune držav članic;
would like to see national reform programmes becoming more ambitious in future in the area of employment policy and a noticeable qualitative improvement with regard to timing, responsibility, commitment of resources and financing.
želi s tem doseči, da bodo nacionalni programi reform na področju politike zaposlovanja v prihodnosti bolj ambiciozni ter da bo prišlo do izboljšanja kakovosti glede časovne razporeditve, odgovornosti, zavezanosti in financiranja.
would like to see policies that promote the education of more engineers, ICT professionals and business graduates for the space industry;
se zavzema za politike izobraževanja, ki bi omogočale usposobiti več inženirjev, strokovnjakov za IKT in diplomantov poslovnih znanosti za vesoljsko industrijo;
would like to see proposals for a European space procurement policy to support the development of the commercial space sector, which is highly dependent on institutional procurement;
želi, da bi se oblikovali predlogi za politiko javnih naročil v evropskem vesoljskem sektorju, ki bi podprla razvoj komercialnega vesoljskega sektorja, saj je ta močno odvisen od institucionalnih javnih naročil;
would like to see the European Union seeking to be a standard bearer in the area of environmental rules and regulations ;
izraža željo, da bi si Evropska unija prizadevala igrati vodilno vlogo na področju okoljskih zahtev in predpisov;
would make it possible to step up consumer protection, thus making it easier for consumers to more effectively invoke their rights to institute legal proceedings, whilst also ensuring that EU laws are implemented more effectively (Article 3(1)(t) of the EC Treaty);
da bi ukrepanje okrepilo varstvo potrošnikov ter jim omogočilo lažje in učinkovitejše uresničevanje svojih pravic v pravosodju ter bi jim tako zagotovilo učinkovitejšo uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti (člen 3-1 t) Pogodbe);
would make it possible to step up consumer protection, thus making it easier for consumers to more effectively invoke their rights to institute legal proceedings, whilst also ensuring that EU laws are implemented more effectively (Article 3(1)(t) of the EC Treaty);
da bi ukrepanje okrepilo varstvo potrošnikov, jim omogočilo lažje in učinkovitejše uresničevanje svojih pravic v pravosodju ter  jim tako zagotovilo učinkovitejšo uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti (člen 3-1 t) Pogodbe);
would make it possible to step up consumer protection, thus making it easier for consumers to more effectively invoke their rights to institute legal proceedings, whilst also ensuring that EU laws are implemented more effectively (Article 3(1)(t) of the EC Treaty);
da bi ukrepanje okrepilo varstvo potrošnikov, jim omogočilo lažje in učinkovitejše uresničevanje svojih pravic v pravosodju ter jim tako zagotovilo učinkovitejšo uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti (člen 3-1 t) Pogodbe);
would make it possible to step up consumer protection, thus making it easier for consumers to more effectively invoke their rights to institute legal proceedings, whilst also ensuring that EU laws are implemented more effectively (Article 3(1)(t) of the EC Treaty);
da bi ukrepanje okrepilo varstvo potrošnikov, jim omogočilo lažje in učinkovitejše uresničevanje svojih pravic v pravosodju ter jim tako zagotovilo učinkovitejšo uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti (člen 3-1 t) Pogodbe);
would normally be eligible under other EU instruments for external assistance or the other components of this instrument but which, in accordance with Article 2, should be addressed through crisis or emerging crisis measures because of the need to respond rapidly to the situation.
bi bili običajno upravičeni do pomoči iz drugih instrumentov EU za zunanjo pomoč ali na podlagi drugih določb za ta instrument, vendar jih je treba v skladu s členom 2 izvajati kot ukrepe odzivanja na krizne razmere ali razmere porajajoče se krize zaradi potrebe po hitrem odzivu na take razmere.
would not affect national constitutional provisions requiring equal treatment or prohibiting discrimination.
ne bi imela učinka na nacionalne ustavne določbe, ki zahtevajo enako obravnavanje ali prepovedujejo diskriminacijo.
would not be adversely affected by such amendment or withdrawal.
taka sprememba ali odprava ne bi imela škodljivih vplivov.
would not have a harmful effect on the conservation status of the species or on the extent of the territory occupied by the relevant population of the species,
ne bi škodljivo vplival na ohranitveno stanje vrste ali na obseg ozemlja, kjer živi obravnavana populacija vrste,
would occur in the public sector as a result of having to monitor additional substances, and possibly also to cover investiments in UWWTPs (a cost that would likely be passed on to consumers);
nastali bodo v javnem sektorju zaradi obveznosti spremljanja dodatnih snovi in verjetno tudi kritja naložb v komunalne čistilne naprave (strošek, ki bo verjetno prenesen na potrošnike);
would only prohibit discrimination in the areas that fall within EC competence, so would not affect the organisation or content of education (e.g. special needs education), questions of marital status (e.g. same sex partnerships/marriages) or family law (e.g. adoption) or national rules on the secular nature of the State or its institutions;
bi prepovedovala diskriminacijo samo na področjih v pristojnosti ES, zato ne bi vplivala na organizacijo ali vsebino izobraževanja (npr. izobraževanje za učence s posebnimi potrebami), vprašanja zakonskega stanu (npr. istospolna partnerstva/zakonske zveze) ali družinsko pravo (npr. posvojitve) ali nacionalna pravila o laični naravi države ali njenih institucij;
Would parties make an efficient choice or would the choice be done unilaterally by the insurers through opt in and opt out clauses in their general terms of insurance?
Ali bi stranke izbrale učinkovito ali bi izbiro enostransko opravili zavarovatelji s klavzulami za ("opt-in") in proti ("opt-out") v svojih splošnih pogojih zavarovanja?
Would parties make an efficient choice or would the choice be made unilaterally by the insurers through opt in and opt out clauses in their general terms of insurance?
Ali bi stranke izbrale učinkovito ali bi izbiro enostransko opravili zavarovatelji s klavzulami za ("opt-in") in proti ("opt-out") v svojih splošnih pogojih zavarovanja?
Would peer evaluation methods be useful in addressing existing shortcomings across Europe?
Ali bi bilo vrednotenje na isti strokovni ravni lahko koristno pri obravnavanju obstoječih pomanjkljivosti v Evropi?
would prepare the meetings of the Senior Officials and Euro-Mediterranean Committee meetings and ensure the appropriate follow up;
pripravljal bo srečanja visokih uradnikov in evro-sredozemskega odbora ter zagotavljal primerne nadaljnje ukrepe,
would put more emphasis on longer term sustainable effects rather than pressing for short term achievements,
želi, da se večja pozornost nameni dolgoročnim trajnostnim učinkom kot pa zahtevam po kratkoročnih dosežkih;
would put more emphasis on longer term sustainable effects rather than pressing for short term achievements,
želi, da se večja pozornost nameni dolgoročnim trajnostnim učinkom kot zahtevam po kratkoročnih dosežkih,
Would stronger co-ownership of the policy be preferred by partners?
Ali bi imele partnerske države raje večjo soodgovornost za politiko?
Would subsidiary liability be an effective and feasible way to establish that responsibility in the case of sub-contractors?
Ali bi bila subsidiarna odgovornost učinkovit in izvedljiv način za določitev te odgovornosti v primeru podizvajalcev?
Would substantial benefits arise from facilitating cross-border or central acquiring?
Ali bi spodbujanje čezmejnega ali centralnega pridobivanja imelo znatne koristi?
Would such changes require additional checks and balances or new measures in the merchant-consumer relations, so that consumer rights are not affected?
Ali bi take spremembe zahtevale dodaten medsebojni nadzor ali nove ukrepe na področju povezav med trgovcem in potrošnikom, da bi se preprečil vpliv na pravice potrošnikov?
Would such measures be effective on their own or would they require additional flanking measures?
Ali bi bili taki ukrepi učinkoviti sami po sebi ali pa bi zahtevali dodatne spremljevalne ukrepe?
Would such situation not illustrate the need for a horizontal approach of EU policies, in particular transport and competition policies with regard to maritime transport, as envisaged by the Green Paper on a Future Policy for the Oceans?
Ali takšne razmere ne govorijo o nujnosti horizontalnega pristopa k politikam EU, še posebej na področju prevoza in konkurence v pomorskem prevozu, kot to predvideva zelena knjiga o prihodnji politiki za oceane?
Would the Commission make recommendations to a Member State which in the past had taken measures to improve its competitiveness which now result in strong surpluses that are detrimental to the euro area?
Ali bi Komisija predložila priporočila državi članici, ki je v preteklosti sprejela ukrepe za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti, ki so zdaj privedli do velikih presežkov, kar škoduje euroobmočju?
Would the creation of a European support office be a valid option?
Bi bila ustanovitev evropskega urada za podporo utemeljena možnost?
Would the creation of a platform for monitoring all aspects of pension policy in an integrated manner be part of the way forward?
Ali naj bo vzpostavitev skupnega izhodišča za spremljanje vseh vidikov pokojninske politike na celosten način del nadaljnjih prizadevanj?
Would the creation of information-sharing mechanisms such as those mentioned above be an appropriate means?
Bi bila vzpostavitev mehanizmov za izmenjavo informacij, kot so tisti, ki so navedeni zgoraj, ustrezno sredstvo?
Would the development of "standardised" conformity assessment schemes and documentation, as well as labels facilitate their work?
Ali bi jim razvoj „standardiziranih“ shem in dokumentacije za ocenjevanje skladnosti skupaj z oznakami olajšal delo?
Would the development of identification systems for audiovisual works and rights ownership databases facilitate the clearance of rights for online distribution of audiovisual works?
Ali bi razvoj identifikacijskih sistemov za avdiovizualna dela in podatkovnih baz za lastništvo pravic olajšal pridobivanje pravic za spletno distribucijo avdiovizualnih del?
Would the environmental incentive created by energy taxation be a sufficient and adequate response to reflect the objectives of the energy policy in the field of biofuels, including the creation of a market-based incentive for second generation biofuels?
Bi bila okoljska spodbuda, ustvarjena z obdavčitvijo energije, zadosten in primeren odgovor na cilje energetske politike na področju biogoriv, vključno z oblikovanjem tržne spodbude za drugo generacijo biogoriv?
Would the establishment of the abovementioned MBI Forum be useful to stimulate exchanges of experience/best practice on Environmental Tax Reform between Member States?
Bi bila vzpostavitev zgoraj navedenega foruma za tržne instrumente koristna za spodbujanje izmenjave izkušenj/najboljših praks o reformi okoljskega davka med državami članicami?
Would the EU, would partners, benefit from a narrower focus and greater prioritisation?
Ali bi EU in partnerskim državam koristila ožja usmeritev in boljše določanje prednostnih nalog?
Would the health insurance schemes, and especially the health insurance premiums, reflect the risks connected to smoking, smokers would be forced to bear the costs of their habit.
Če bi sheme zdravstvenega zavarovanja in še posebej premije za zdravstveno zavarovanje odražale tveganja, povezana s kajenjem, bi bili kadilci prisiljeni nositi stroške svoje razvade.
Would the setting up of a European funding framework adequately address the implementation gap in the completion of TEN-T projects and policy objectives?
Bi bilo z vzpostavitvijo evropskega okvira financiranja mogoče ustrezno odpraviti zaostanek pri izvajanju projektov in političnih ciljev omrežja TEN-T?
Would the splitting of responsibility for the supervision of the management company and the fund across jurisdictions give rise to additional operational risks or supervisory concerns?
Ali bi delitev odgovornosti za nadzor družbe za upravljanje in sklada med različnimi sodnimi pristojnostmi lahko botrovala dodatnim operativnim tveganjem ali nadzorniškim težavam?
Would the suggested changes to the Energy Taxation Directive and the proposed approach to its scope be the best solution for ensuring coherence between the Directive and EU ETS?
Ali bi predlagane spremembe Direktive o obdavčitvi energije in predlagani pristop k njenem področju uporabe bili najboljša rešitev za zagotovitev skladnosti med direktivo in EU ETS?
Would there be added value and more efficiency in stronger ACP-EU cooperation on these matters?
Ali bi tesnejše sodelovanje med državami AKP in EU pri teh vprašanjih pomenilo dodano vrednost in večjo učinkovitost?
Would there be benefit in providing reference models for capacity mechanisms?
Ali bi bilo koristno zagotoviti referenčne modele za mehanizme zmogljivosti?
Would there be merit in having European Union minimum rules for maximum pre-trial detention periods and the regular review of such detention in order to strengthen mutual trust?
Ali bi bili minimalna pravila za najdaljši čas trajanja pripora pred sojenjem ter redna presoja pripornih razlogov koristni za krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja?
Would they be able to promote environmental clauses in trade agreements at corporate level?
Bi se lahko zavzemali za okoljske klavzule v trgovinskih sporazumih na ravni podjetij?
Would this also include the need for prices to reflect scarcity of available transmission capacity?
Ali bi to vključevalo tudi potrebo, da cene odražajo pomanjkanje razpoložljive prenosne zmogljivosti?
Would this apply to all countries?
Ali bi to veljalo za vse države?
Would this be possible in your view without jeopardizing the quality of offers?
Ali menite, da bi bilo to mogoče, ne da bi se ogrozila kakovost ponudb?
Would this help build viable markets for certain products and new technologies?
Ali bi to pomagalo pri izgradnji trgov za nekatere izdelke in nove tehnologije, ki so sposobni preživeti?
Would this kind of flexible approach to identifying projects of common interest be appropriate for a policy that, traditionally, largely rests on Member States' individual infrastructure investment decisions?
Bi bila ta vrsta prožnega pristopa k opredelitvi projektov skupnega interesa primerna za politiko, ki temelji tradicionalno večinoma na individualnih odločitvah držav članic o naložbah v infrastrukturo?
Would this kind of priority network approach be better than the current priority projects approach?
Bi bil takšen pristop prednostnega omrežja boljši kot sedanji pristop prednostnih projektov?
Would this make energy taxation a more effective instrument by better combining the incentive effects of taxation with the ability to generate revenue?
Bi s tem obdavčitev energije postala učinkovitejši instrument z boljšim povezovanjem spodbudnih učinkov obdavčitve z zmožnostjo ustvarjanja prihodka?
Would this make the use of e-Procurement systems more attractive?
Bi bila uporaba sistemov e-javnih naročil zato privlačnejša?
would thus generate revenue for the Member States (mainly through a reduction in unemployment and an increase in tax revenue);
tako prispevala k povečanju dohodkov držav (zlasti z zmanjšanjem stopnje brezposelnosti in povečanjem prihodkov od davkov);
would warn against the risk of increasing the legislative burden of conformity for companies listed on stock exchanges;
opozarja pred nevarnostjo, da se poveča zakonodajna obremenitev podjetij, ki kotirajo na borzi, zaradi uskladitve z zakonodajo;
Would you be in favour of a better provision of information on EU legislation, in particular as regards implementation and enforcement?
Ali menite, da je potrebno boljše obveščanje o evropski zakonodaji, predvsem o njenem izvajanju in uveljavljanju?
Would you be in favour of creating a Europe-wide pre-qualification system?
Ali bi podprli vzpostavitev vseevropskega sistema predhodnega ugotavljanja usposobljenosti?
Would you be in favour of introducing an EU definition of conflict of interest in public procurement?
98. Ali se strinjate s tem, da bi na ravni EU uvedli opredelitev navzkrižja interesov pri javnem naročanju?
Would you be in favour, for instance, of establishing an ex-ante control on subcontracting?
Ali bi na primer podprli uvedbo predhodnega nadzora glede podizvajanja?
Would you be interested in developing rules for national certification and registering of facilities and researchers which could facilitate European and international exchange of samples and expertise?
Ali bi vas zanimalo oblikovanje predpisov za certifikacijo in registracijo obratov ter raziskovalcev na nacionalni ravni, ki bi lahko spodbudili evropsko in mednarodno izmenjavo vzorcev ter strokovnega znanja?
Would you consider it useful to further define these measures at EU level?
Bi bilo po vašem mnenju koristno, da bi se navedena merila dodatno opredelila na ravni EU?
Would you consider it useful to regulate more specifically these interviews or investigations at EU level?
Ali bi se vam zdelo koristno, da bi se ti pogovori ali poizvedovanja natančneje regulirali na ravni EU?
Would you in principle welcome a replacement of the existing legal regime on obtaining evidence in criminal matters by a single instrument based on the principle of mutual recognition covering all types of evidence, including evidence that does not already exist or is not directly available without further investigation or examination?
Ali bi bili načeloma zadovoljni z nadomestitvijo obstoječe pravne ureditve za zbiranje dokazov v kazenskih zadevah z enotnim instrumentom, ki bi temeljil na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja za vse vrste dokazov, vključno z dokazi, ki še ne obstajajo ali ki niso neposredno na voljo brez predhodne preiskave ali pregleda?
Would you in principle welcome the introduction of common standards for gathering evidence?
Ali bi bili načeloma zadovoljni z uvedbo skupnih standardov za zbiranje dokazov?
Would you like to know more?
Dodatne informacije