natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ð As many Member States have established dispute resolution procedures also for end-users other than consumers, to whom Directive 2013/11/EU does not apply, it is reasonable to maintain the sector-specific dispute resolution procedure for both consumers and, where Member States extend it, also for other end-users, in particular micro and small enterprises. ï Member States should take full account of Commission Recommendation 98/257/EC of 30 March 1998 on the principles applicable to the bodies responsible for out-of-court settlement of consumer disputes50.
Ker so mnoge države uvedle postopke reševanja sporov tudi za končne uporabnike, ki niso potrošniki, za katere se Direktiva 2013/11/EU ne uporablja, je ustrezno postopek reševanja sporov, specifičen za ta sektor, ohraniti tako za potrošnike kot tudi za druge končne uporabnike, če se države članice tako odločijo, zlasti mikro in mala podjetja. ï Države članice naj v celoti upoštevajo Priporočilo Komisije 98/257/ES z dne 30. marca 1998 o načelih, ki veljajo za organe, odgovorne za izvensodne poravnave sporov potrošnikov50.
ð As opposed to micro and small enterprises, larger enterprises usually have stronger bargaining power and do, therefore, not depend on the same contractual information requirements as consumers.
ð Za razliko od mikropodjetij in malih podjetij imajo večja podjetja po navadi večjo pogajalsko moč in zato niso odvisna od istih zahtev glede pogodbenih informacij kot potrošniki.
ð As use of spectrum for military and other national public security purposes impacts on the availability of spectrum for the internal market, radio spectrum policy should take into account all sectors and aspects of Union policies and balance their respective needs, while respecting Member States' rights. ï
ð Glede na to, da uporaba spektra za vojaške in druge namene nacionalne javne varnosti vpliva na dostopnost spektra za notranji trg, bi morala politika radiofrekvenčnega spektra upoštevati vse sektorje in vidike politike Unije ter uravnavati njihove potrebe ob spoštovanju pravic držav članic. ï
ð Assuming responsibility by a Member State for examining an application lodged with it in cases when such examination is not its responsibility under the criteria laid down in this Regulation may undermine the effectiveness and sustainability of the system and should be exceptional. ï Any Ö Therefore, a Õ Member State should be able to derogate from the responsibility criteria, in particular ð only ï on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, ð in particular for family reasons, before a Member State responsible has been determined ï in order to bring together family members, relatives or any other family relations and examine an application for international protection lodged with it or with another Member State, even if such examination is not its responsibility under the binding criteria laid down in this Regulation.
ð Če država članica prevzame odgovornost za obravnavo prošnje, ki je bila pri njej vložena, v primerih, kadar za tako obravnavo v skladu z merili iz te uredbe ni odgovorna, to lahko ogrozi učinkovitost in trajnost sistema, zato bi morala tako ukrepati le izjemoma. ï Kateri koli  Zato bi moralo biti Õ državi članici bi moralo biti dovoljeno odstopanje od meril odgovornosti zlasti ð samo ï iz humanitarnih razlogov in sočutja ð in zlasti zaradi družinskih razlogov, preden se določi odgovorna država članica, ï , da bi omogočili združitev z družinskimi člani, sorodniki ali katerimi koli drugimi svojci, ter obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, ki je bila vložena v njej ali v drugi državi članici, tudi če tako obravnavanje ni njena odgovornost glede na zavezujoča merila iz te uredbe.
ð Calculation of the net costs of providing universal service should be based on an objective and transparent methodology to ensure the most cost-effective provision of universal service and promote a level playing field for market operators.
ð Izračun neto stroškov zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve bi moral temeljiti na objektivni in pregledni metodologiji, da se omogoči najučinkovitejše zagotavljanje univerzalne storitve in spodbujajo enaki konkurenčni pogoji za udeležence na trgu.
ð Certain obligations imposed on broadcasters for the delivery of audiovisual media services may require the use of specific criteria and procedures for the granting of spectrum usage rights to meet a specific general interest objective set out by Member States in conformity with  Union law. ï Ö However, the procedure for the granting of such right should in any event be objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate.
ð Določene obveznosti, naložene radiodifuzijskim hišam za zagotavljanje avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, lahko zahtevajo uporabo posebnih meril in postopkov za dodeljevanje pravic do uporabe spektra, da se izpolni posebni cilj splošnega interesa, ki ga določijo države članice v skladu s pravom Unije. ï Ö Vendar pa bi moral biti postopek za dodelitev takšnih pravic vedno objektiven, pregleden, nediskriminatoren in sorazmeren.
ð Competent authorities should seek to reconcile the environmental and public health considerations in question, taking due account of the precautionary approach set out in Council Recommendation No 1999/519/EC. ï
ð Pristojni organi bi si morali prizadevati uskladiti zadevne okoljevarstvene in javnozdravstvene dejavnike, ob upoštevanju previdnostnega pristopa iz Priporočila Sveta št. 1999/519/ES. ï
ð DELEGATED ACTS ï
ð DELEGIRANI AKTI ï
ð For disputes involving consumers and falling within the scope of Regulation (EU) 524/2013, the provisions of that Regulation shall apply provided that the dispute settlement entity concerned has been notified to the Commission under Article 20 of Directive 2013/11/EU. ï
ð Za spore, ki vključujejo potrošnike in spadajo na področje uporabe Uredbe (EU) 524/2013, se uporabljajo določbe navedene uredbe, če so bili zadevni organi za reševanje sporov priglašeni Komisiji v skladu s členom 20 Direktive 2013/11/EU. ï
ð Furthermore, it does not preclude taking into account that certain transmission media have physical characteristics and architectural features that can be superior in terms of quality of service, capacity, maintenance cost, energy efficiency, management flexibility, reliability, robustness and scalability, and ultimately in terms of performance, which can be reflected in actions taken in view of pursuing the various regulatory objectives. ï
ð Poleg tega ne izključuje upoštevanja dejstva, da imajo nekateri mediji za prenos podatkov fizične in arhitekturne lastnosti, ki so lahko boljše v smislu kakovosti storitve, zmogljivosti, stroškov vzdrževanja, energijske učinkovitosti, prožnosti pri uporabi, zanesljivosti, vzdržljivosti in nadgradljivosti, pa tudi v smislu delovanja, kar se lahko odraža pri ukrepih, sprejetih za izpolnjevanje različnih regulativnih ciljev. ï
ð Hits obtained from Eurodac based on facial images should also be verified where there is doubt that the result relates to the same person. ï
ð Zadetke iz sistema Eurodac na podlagi podobe obraza bi bilo treba preveriti tudi, kadar obstajajo dvomi, da se rezultati nanašajo na isto osebo. ï
ð However, Member States should have the possibility to set a shorter maximum duration in light of national conditions, such as levels of competition and stability of network investments.
ð Vendar bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da skrajšajo najdaljše pogodbeno obdobje glede na nacionalne razmere, kot sta raven konkurence in stabilnost naložb v omrežja.
ð If a Member State finds that further rights can be made available in a band, it should start the process therefor. ï
ð Če država članica meni, da lahko da na voljo nadaljnje pravice v pasu, bi morala začeti temu namenjen postopek. ï
ð If after carrying out a due assessment, taking into account the results of the geographical survey of networks deployment conducted by the national regulatory authority, it is shown that neither the market nor public intervention mechanisms are likely to provide end-users in certain areas with a connection capable of delivering functional internet access service as defined by Member States in accordance with Article 79 (2) and voice communications services at a fixed location, the Member State should be able to exceptionally designate different undertakings or sets of undertakings to provide these services in the different relevant parts of the national territory. ï The requirement is for the provision of local, national and international telephone calls, facsimile communications and data services, the provision of which ð Universal service obligations in support of availability of functional internet access service ï may be restricted by Member States to the end-user’s primary location or residence.
ð Če se pri ustrezni oceni, v kateri se upoštevajo rezultati geografske raziskave uvedbe omrežij, ki jo je izvedel nacionalni regulativni organ, pokaže, da najverjetneje niti trg niti mehanizmi javne intervencije ne bodo mogli končnim uporabnikom na nekaterih območjih zagotoviti povezave, ki bi omogočala storitev funkcionalnega dostopa do interneta, kot so jo opredelile države članice v skladu s členom 79(2), in govorne komunikacijske storitve na fiksni lokaciji, bi moralo biti državam članicam omogočeno, da izjemoma določijo različna podjetja ali skupine podjetij, ki bi zagotavljala te storitve v posameznih zadevnih delih nacionalnega ozemlja. ï Ta zahteva velja za zagotavljanje lokalnih, državnih in mednarodnih telefonskih klicev ter faksimilnih in podatkovnih komunikacij, ki jih  ð Obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve v podporo razpoložljivosti storitve funkcionalnega dostopa do interneta ï lahko države članice lahko omejijo na primarno lokacijo ali primarno prebivališče končnega uporabnika.
ð If deemed appropriate, national regulatory authorities may promote self- or co-regulatory measures prior to imposing any obligation. ï
ð Če se zdi primerno, lahko nacionalni regulativni organi spodbujajo samoregulativne ali koregulativne ukrepe, preden naložijo kakršno koli obveznost. ï
ð In accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation, national regulatory authorities and other competent authorities shall not deny the provision of the requested information to the Commission, to BEREC or to another authority on the grounds of confidentiality or the need to consult with the parties which provided the information.
ð V skladu z načelom lojalnega sodelovanja nacionalni regulativni organi in drugi pristojni organi ne nasprotujejo predložitvi zahtevanih informacij Komisiji, BEREC-u ali drugemu pristojnemu organu zaradi zaupnosti ali potrebe po posvetovanju s strankami, ki so jim informacije predložile.
ð In addition, where BEREC shares the Commission's concerns, the Commission should be able to require a national regulatory authority to withdraw a draft measure. ï In order to benefit from the expertise of national regulatory authorities on the market analysis, the Commission should consult BEREC prior to adoption of its decisions and/or recommendations.
ð Če BEREC soglaša s pomisleki Komisije, bi morala Komisija tudi imeti možnost, da od nacionalnega regulativnega organa zahteva, da umakne osnutek ukrepa. ï Da bi izkoristili strokovno znanje nacionalnih regulativnih organov o tržni analizi, bi se morala Komisija pred sprejetjem odločitve in/ali mnenja posvetovati z BEREC-om.
ð In all other cases, they shall set out the conditions for the use of radio spectrum in a general authorisation.
ð V vseh drugih primerih določijo pogoje za uporabo radiofrekvenčnega spektra pri splošni odobritvi.
ð In any case, Member States should grant effective judicial review against such decisions. ï
ð V vsakem primeri bi morale države članice zagotoviti učinkovito sodno varstvo pred takimi odločitvami. ï
ð In case of failure of the porting process, the transferring provider shall reactivate the number of the end-user until the porting is successful ï Competent nNational ð regulatory ï authorities shall also take into account, where necessary, ð appropriate ï measures ensuring that subscribers ð end-users ï are ð adequately informed and ï protected throughout the switching process and are not switched to another provider against their will.
ð Če postopek prenosa ni uspešen, prenosni ponudnik ponovno aktivira številko končnega uporabnika, dokler prenos ni uspešen ï Pristojni nNacionalni ð regulativni ï organi po potrebi zagotovijo ð primerno informiranje in ï zaščito ð končnih uporabnikov ï v celotnem postopku zamenjave ponudnika in poskrbijo, da se ponudnik ne zamenja proti volji naročnika.
ð In case the decision is challenged, this remedy shall be an integral part of the remedy referred to in paragraph 1. ï
ðV primeru izpodbijanja odločitve je to pravno sredstvo sestavni del pravnega sredstva iz odstavka 1. ï
ð In exceptional cases, the authorities of the Member State of habitual residence of the child may not be the most appropriate authorities to deal with the case. ï In the Ö best Õ interests of the child, this Regulation allows, by way of Ö as an Õ exception and under certain conditions, that the court Ö authority Õ having jurisdiction may transfer Ö its jurisdiction in Õ a Ö specific Õ case to a court Ö an authority Õ of another Member State if this court Ö authority Õ is better placed to hear the case.
ð V izjemnih primerih organi države članice otrokovega običajnega prebivališča morda niso najprimernejši organi za obravnavo zadeve. ï  Za otrokovo korist Õ Ta uredba omogoča, da v interesu otroka izjemoma in pod določenimi pogoji, pristojno sodišče  pristojni organ Õ lahko prenese zadevo  svojo pristojnost v določeni zadevi Õ na sodišče  organ Õ druge države članice, če je to sodišče  ta organ Õ bolj primerno primernejši za odločanje o zadevi.
ð In line with the requirements of Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, ï Aany such interference must be in accordance with the law, which must be formulated with sufficient precision to allow individuals to adjust their conduct and it must protect individuals against arbitrariness and indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise.
ðV skladu s členom 52(1) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah mora biti vsako ï Vsako tako poseganje mora biti skladno s pravom, ki mora biti dovolj natančno opredeljeno, da posameznikom omogoči, da prilagodijo svoje vedenje, posameznike mora tudi ščititi pred samovoljo ter mora dovolj jasno navesti obseg prostega preudarka, poverjenega pristojnim organom, in način njegovega uveljavljanja.
ð In May 2015 the Commission indicated in its Communication on the European Agenda on Migration that the Dublin Regulation would be evaluated and, if necessary, that a proposal for its revision would be made, in particular to achieve a fairer distribution of asylum seekers in Europe ï .
ð Komisija je maja 2015 v sporočilu o evropski agendi o migracijah navedla, da bo izvedla oceno dublinske uredbe in po potrebi predložila predlog za njeno revizijo, zlasti z namenom, da se doseže pravičnejša porazdelitev prosilcev za azil po Evropi ï .
ð In order to avoid arbitrary dismissals, the dismissed member should have the right to request that the competent courts verify the existence of a valid reason to dismiss, among those foreseen in this Directive.
ð Da bi se izognili arbitrarnim razrešitvam, bi moral imeti razrešeni član pravico, da zahteva, da pristojna sodišča preverijo, ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za razrešitev, kot so določeni v tej direktivi.
ð In order to avoid creating an excessive burden on service providers national regulatory authorities should verify, whether the objectives of equivalent access and choice can actually be achieved without such measures. ï
ð Da bi preprečili nalaganje prevelikih bremen ponudnikom storitev, bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi preveriti, ali je cilja enakovrednega dostopa in ponudbe mogoče doseči brez takih ukrepov. ï
ð In order to discourage secondary movements of unaccompanied minors, which are not in their best interests, in the absence of a family member or a relative, the Member State responsible should be that where the unaccompanied minor first has lodged his or her application for international protection, unless it is demonstrated that this would not be in the best interests of the child.
ðDa bi se mladoletniki brez spremstva odvračali od sekundarnih gibanj, ki niso v njihovo največjo korist, če družinski član ali sorodnik nista prisotna, bi se morala za odgovorno državo članico šteti tista država članica, v kateri je mladoletnik brez spremstva prvič vložil prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito, razen če se dokaže, da to ne bilo v otrokovo največjo korist.
ð In particular, duplication of requests for information by the competent authority, and by BEREC ï It is not necessary to require Ö and the Õ systematic and regular proof of compliance with all conditions under the Ö a Õ general authorisation or attached to Ö a Õ right of use ð should be avoided ï.
ð Zlasti se je treba izogibati podvajanju zahtevkov za informacije s strani pristojnega organa in BEREC-a ï Ni treba zahtevati Ö ter Õ sistematičnemuga in rednemuga dokazovanjua skladnosti z vsemi pogoji iz splošne odobritve ali pripadajočih pravice do uporabe.
ð In the event that price controls are deemed appropriate, ï sSuch terms and conditions Ö can Õ may include pricing arrangements which depend on volumes or length of contract in accordance with Community Ö Union Õ law and provided they have no discriminatory effect.
ð Če nadzor nad cenami velja za primeren, ï tTi pogoji lahko vključujejo dogovore o cenah, ki so odvisne od obsega ali dolžine pogodbe, v skladu s pravom Skupnosti Ö Unije Õ in pod pogojem, da nimajo diskriminatornega učinka.
ð In view of the deep sectorial expertise of national regulatory authorities, Member States should enable the national regulatory authority to act as dispute settlement entity, through a separate body within that authority which should not be subject to any instructions.
ð Glede na obsežno sektorsko strokovno znanje nacionalnih regulativnih organov bi jim morale države članice omogočiti, da delujejo kot subjekti za reševanje sporov, in sicer prek ločenega telesa znotraj nacionalnega regulativnega organa, ki ne bi smelo prejemati nobenih navodil.
ð Information in accordance with this paragraph on existing notifications already made to the national regulatory authority on the date of transposition of this Directive shall be provided to BEREC at the latest on [date of transposition]. ï
ð Informacije v skladu z odstavkom o uradnih obvestilih, ki so bila na dan prenosa te direktive že posredovana nacionalnemu regulativnemu organu se BEREC-u posredujejo najpozneje [dan prenosa]. ï
ð Information regarding compliance with coverage obligations attached to rights of use for radio spectrum is key to ensure completeness of the geographic surveys of network deployments undertaken by national regulatory authorities.
ð Informacije v zvezi s skladnostjo z obveznostmi glede pokritosti, povezanimi s pravicami do uporabe radiofrekvenčnega spektra, so ključnega pomena za zagotovitev celovitosti geografskih raziskav uvedbe omrežja, ki jih izvedejo nacionalni regulativni organi.
ð It is necessary to clarify that material reception conditions should be made available to applicants as from the moment when the person expresses his or her wish to apply for international protection to officials of the determining authority, as well as any officials of other authorities which are designated as competent to receive and register applications or which assist the determining authority to receive such applications in line with Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX [Procedures Regulation].ï
ð Treba je pojasniti, da bi bilo treba prosilcem zagotoviti materialne pogoje za sprejem od trenutka, ko oseba poda prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito uradnikom organa za presojo ali kateremu koli uradniku drugega organa, ki je določen kot pristojen za sprejem in registracijo prošenj oziroma ki organu za presojo pomaga sprejemati takšne prošnje v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št.
ð It should be withdrawn where it was clearly wrongly granted, having regard to the requirements laid down in this Regulation. ï
ð Kadar je bilo jasno pomotoma odobreno, bi ga bilo treba umakniti, ob upoštevanju zahtev iz te uredbe. ï
ð Member States and BEREC shall also contribute to the achievement of these objectives ï .
ð Države članice in BEREC prispevajo k doseganju teh ciljev. ï
ð Member States shall ensure that this decision is subject to review by a court, on points of fact as well as on points of law. ï
ð Države članice zagotovijo, da je ta sklep podvržen nadzoru sodišča tako glede dejanskih kot glede pravnih vprašanj. ï
ð Member States shall inform the Commission and the European Union Agency for Asylum of the levels of reference applied by national law or practice with a view to determining the level of financial assistance provided to applicants in accordance with this paragraph.
ð Države članice obvestijo Komisijo in Agencijo Evropske unije za azil o referenčnih ravneh, ki se uporabljajo po nacionalnem pravu ali praksi, da se določi raven finančne pomoči, ki se zagotovi prosilcem v skladu s tem odstavkom.
ð Member States should also have the possibility to ensure affordability of services not provided at a fixed location but to citizens on the move, where they deem this necessary to ensure their full social and economic participation in society. ï The requirement is limited to a single narrowband network connection, the provision of which may be restricted by Member States to the end-user's primary location/residence, and does not extend to the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) which provides two or more connections capable of being used simultaneously.
ð Države članice bi morale imeti tudi možnost zagotoviti cenovno dostopnost storitev, ki se ne zagotavljajo na fiksni lokaciji, ampak mobilnim državljanom, če menijo, da je to potrebno za zagotovitev njihove polne družbene in gospodarske udeležbe v družbi. ï Ta zahteva je omejena na en sam ozkopasovni omrežni priključek, ki ga lahko države članice omejijo na primarno lokacijo/primarno prebivališče končnega uporabnika in ne vključuje digitalnega omrežja z integriranimi storitvami (ISDN), ki zagotavlja dva ali več priključkov z možnostjo sočasne uporabe.
ð Member States should be able to grant rights of use for numbers to undertakings other than providers of electronic communications networks or services in view of the increasing relevance of numbers for various Internet of Things services. ï All elements of national numbering plans should be managed by national regulatory authorities, including point codes used in network addressing.
ð Države članice bi morale imeti možnost podeliti pravice do uporabe številk podjetjem, ki niso ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ali storitev, glede na vse večji pomen številk za različne storitve interneta stvari. ï Vse elemente nacionalnih načrtov oštevilčenja najbi morali upravljajoti nacionalni regulativni organi, vključno s točkovnimi kodami, ki se uporabljajo pri omrežnem naslavljanju.
ð Member States should define appropriate measures according to national circumstances, which gives flexibility for Member States to take specific measures for instance if the market is not delivering affordable products and services incorporating facilities for disabled end-users under normal economic conditions. ï
ð Države članice bi morale opredeliti primerne ukrepe v skladu z nacionalnimi razmerami, kar daje državam članicam prilagodljivost pri sprejemanju posebnih ukrepov, denimo v primeru, če trg ne zagotavlja cenovno dostopnih izdelkov in storitev, ki vključujejo zmogljivosti za končne uporabnike invalide v običajnih gospodarskih pogojih. ï
ð Member States should provide an objective justification for the ‘must carry’ obligations that they impose in their national law so as to ensure that such obligations are transparent, proportionate and clearly defined.
ðDržave članice bi morale v svojem nacionalnem pravu zagotoviti objektivno utemeljitev obveznosti prenosa, ki jih naložijo, za zagotovitev, da so take obveznosti pregledne, sorazmerne in jasno opredeljene.