natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This option does not restrict right holders and broadcasters' possibility to continue licensing rights on a territorial basis, subject to the requirements of EU and national law.
Ta možnost ne omejuje pravice imetnikov in možnosti radiodifuzijskih hiš, da še naprej licencirajo pravice na podlagi ozemlja, ob upoštevanju zahtev iz prava EU in nacionalnega prava.
This option does not trigger a 'back to basics' review of Community objectives.
Ta možnost ne zahteva pregleda ciljev Skupnosti po načelu „nazaj k osnovam“.
This option does nothing to address over-capacity in the ginning industry and delays restructuring.
Ta opcija ne prispeva k reševanju problema prevelikih zmogljivosti odzrnjevalne panoge in upočasnjuje prestrukturiranje.
This option emphasises the role of each main stakeholder in favouring sustainable practices.
Ta možnost poudarja vlogo vsake glavne zainteresirane strani pri spodbujanju trajnostnih praks.
This option enables the Commission to increase policy coherence and the impact of its instruments which pursue common policy objectives.
Ta možnost Komisiji omogoča, da poveča usklajenost politike in učinek svojih instrumentov, s katerimi skuša uresničiti skupne cilje politike.
This option enables the small and medium-sized issuers to redirect their resources to publish the kind of information that suits best their investors.
Ta možnost malim in srednje velikim izdajateljem omogoča, da svoja sredstva preusmerijo v objavo tiste vrste informacij, ki so za njihove vlagatelje najprimernejše.
This option enables vertically integrated companies to retain the ownership of their network assets, but requires that the transmission network itself is managed by an independent system operator - an undertaking or entity entirely separate from the vertically integrated company - that performs all the functions of a network operator.
Vertikalno integriranim podjetjem omogoča, da ohranijo lastništvo nad svojimi omrežnimi sredstvi, vendar zahteva, da omrežje samo upravlja neodvisni upravljavec omrežja – podjetje ali subjekt, ki je popolnoma ločen od vertikalno integriranega podjetja – ki opravlja vse dejavnosti upravljavca omrežja.
This option encompasses all possible benefits and no disadvantages in comparison with the baseline scenario.
Ta možnost zajema vse možne prednosti in nobenih pomanjkljivosti v primerjavi z izhodiščnim scenarijem.
This option ensures full equivalence with the longest term of protection in the world.
Ta možnost zagotavlja enakovrednost z najdaljšim trajanjem varstva na svetu.
This option entails all the measures previously mentioned.
Ta možnost vključuje vse predhodno navedene ukrepe.
This option entails taking specific action to implement the Resolution by adopting a) a policy document that commits the Commission and the EU on a clear strategy in international fora, indicating objectives and intended actions; and b) a regulation to implement the measures recommended by the General Assembly in respect of EU vessels operating in non-RFMO areas, namely the present proposal.
Ta možnost vključuje sprejetje posebnega ukrepa za izvajanje Resolucije s sprejetjem a) dokumenta o politiki s cilji in načrtovanimi ukrepi, s katerim se Komisija in EU zavežeta, da bosta v mednarodnih forumih upoštevali jasno strategijo; in b) uredbe o izvajanju ukrepov, ki jih priporoča Generalna skupščina v zvezi s plovili EU, ki plujejo na območjih, za katera niso pristojne regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva.
This option entails taking specific action to implement the Resolution by adopting a) a policy document that commits the Commission and the EU on a clear strategy in international fora, indicating objectives and intended actions; and b) a regulation to implement the measures recommended by the General Assembly in respect of EU vessels operating in non-RFMO areas.
Ta možnost vključuje sprejetje posebnega ukrepa za izvajanje Resolucije s sprejetjem a) dokumenta o politiki s cilji in načrtovanimi ukrepi, s katerim se Komisija in EU zavežeta, da bosta v mednarodnih forumih upoštevali jasno strategijo; in b) uredbe o izvajanju ukrepov, ki jih priporoča Generalna skupščina v zvezi s plovili EU, ki plujejo na območjih, za katera niso pristojne regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva.
This option envisages changes in the two Directives with the aim to align them with the latest ICRP recommendations and with the advance of the scientific knowledge.
Ta možnost predvideva spremembo teh dveh direktiv, da bi bili usklajeni z najnovejšimi priporočili ICRP in znanstvenim napredkom.
This option envisages continuation of the current practice; introducing no changes to the conditions and procedures for participation and keeping the EU financial contribution based on the reimbursement of eligible costs according to the current reimbursement rates.
Ta možnost predvideva nadaljevanje sedanje prakse, ne uvaja spremenjenih pogojev in postopkov za sodelovanje ter ohranja finančni prispevek EU, ki temelji na povračilu upravičenih stroškov v skladu z obstoječimi tarifami za povrnitev stroškov.
This option envisages some adjustments to the current rules on the basis of the experience of the implementation of the framework in recent years and of the REFIT exercise, in particular strengthening the role of independent NRAs by laying down a minimum set of competences for those NRAs across the Union.
Ta možnost predvideva nekatere prilagoditve trenutnih pravil na podlagi izkušenj pri izvajanju okvira v zadnjih letih in pri programu REFIT, zlasti okrepitev vloge neodvisnih nacionalnih regulativnih organov z določitvijo minimalnega nabora kompetenc zanje po vsej Uniji.
This option envisages the continuation of the current scheme i.e. no policy change.
Ta možnost predvideva nadaljnje izvajanje sedanje sheme, tj. brez sprememb politike.
This option envisages the discontinuation of the Customs Programme, meaning not to provide funding for operating existing or new trans-European IT systems neither for joint actions and common training activities.
Ta možnost predvideva prekinitev programa Carina, kar pomeni, da ne bo zagotovljeno financiranje niti za upravljanje obstoječih ali novih vseevropskih IT-sistemov niti za skupne ukrepe in dejavnosti skupnega usposabljanja.
This option envisages, in particular, a minimum set of harmonised competences for NRAs and the alignment of NRAs’ and BEREC’s tasks, as well as the substantial alignment of BEREC’s governance structure with the Common Approach on decentralised agencies.
Ta možnost predvideva zlasti minimalni nabor harmoniziranih pristojnosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov ter uskladitev nalog nacionalnih regulativnih organov in BEREC-a ter tudi bistveno uskladitev strukture upravljanja BEREC-a s skupnim pristopom k decentraliziranim agencijam.
This option equally falls outside the provisions made in the Budget for Europe 202015.
Tudi ta možnost ne sodi med določbe sporočila o proračunu za strategijo Evropa 202015.
This option expands Option 2 by including ancillary trust services and credentials in the scope of the proposal.
Ta možnost razširja možnost 2 z vključitvijo pomožnih skrbniških storitev in prijavnih podatkov v področje uporabe predloga.
This option focuses the universal service EU obligation on the affordability aspect, including the provision of affordable voice communications and basic broadband in the EU in its scope as well as a right to contract for consumers benefiting from special universal tariffs.
Ta možnost se osredotoča na univerzalno storitev, in sicer obveznost EU glede cenovne dostopnosti, vključno z zagotavljanjem cenovno dostopnih govornih komunikacij in osnovnih širokopasovnih povezav v EU v okviru univerzalne storitve, in tudi pravico do sklenitve pogodbe za potrošnike, ki so upravičeni do posebnih univerzalnih tarif.
This option foresees a common legal and financial framework for the CAP school schemes, based on the three “pillars”:
V skladu s to možnostjo se vzpostavi skupni pravni in finančni okvir šolskih programov v okviru SKP, ki temelji na treh „stebrih“:
This option foresees a further extension of the flexibility provisions in the Tractor Emissions Directive for NTTs, so as to allow the manufacturers of NTTs to sell an additional number of non-compliant tractors without changing the emission requirements as such.
Ta možnost predvideva nadaljnjo razširitev določb o prožnosti v direktivi o emisijah traktorjev za ozkokolotečne traktorje, da se proizvajalcem slednjih omogoči prodajo dodatnih neskladnih traktorjev brez spremembe zahtev glede emisij.
This option foresees complete removal of specific marketing standards from Community legislation, accompanied by a new general standard, applicable to all products.
Ta možnost predvideva popolno ukinitev posebnih tržnih standardov iz zakonodaje Skupnosti in uvedbo novih splošnih standardov, veljavnih za vse proizvode;
This option foresees market misconduct rules defined at EU-level.
Ta možnost predvideva pravila o kršitvah trga, opredeljena na ravni EU.
This option foresees new limit values that will not modify the level of stringency compared to the old system.
Ta možnost predvideva nove mejne vrednosti, ki v primerjavi s starim sistemom ne bodo spremenile ravni strogosti.
This option foresees skipping Stage IIIB and introducing Stage IV emission limits at the dates originally foreseen in the tractors emissions legislation i.e. as of 1 October 2014.
Ta možnost predvideva izpustitev stopnje IIIB in uvedbo mejnih vrednosti emisij stopnje IV na datume, prvotno predvidene v zakonodaji o emisijah traktorjev, tj. od 1. oktobra 2014.
This option foresees the elaboration of a guidance document to assist with the implementation of Article 13 of the Renewable Energy Directive, which requires Member States to ensure that national authorisation and licensing rules applied to renewable energy installations are "proportionate and necessary".
V tej možnosti je predvideno oblikovanje smernic za pomoč pri izvajanju člena 13 direktive o obnovljivih virih energije, ki od držav članic zahteva zagotovitev, da so nacionalni predpisi v zvezi s postopki za izdajo dovoljenj in licenciranja, ki se uporabljajo za naprave za proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov, „sorazmerni in potrebni“.
This option foresees to provide a three years transitional period after the entry into force of the Directive in order to allow industry to adapt the engines to the new technologies.
Ta možnost predvideva določitev triletnega prehodnega obdobja po začetku veljavnosti direktive, da se industriji omogoči prilagoditev motorjev novim tehnologijam.
This option goes further than option 3: it recognises that it is in the EU’s interest to take action to address biodiversity loss not only within the EU, but also beyond its borders.
Ta možnost presega 3. možnost, saj privzema, da je v interesu EU, naj ukrepa proti izgubi biotske raznovrstnosti ne le v EU temveč tudi zunaj njenih meja.
This option had already been debated in the Council, which concluded that a new proposal was necessary and called on the Commission to propose, after consultation with the stakeholders, a new regulation for technical conservation measures.
O tej možnosti je Svet že razpravljal in sklenil, da je potreben nov predlog, ter pozval Komisijo, naj po posvetu z zainteresiranimi stranmi predlaga novo uredbo o tehničnih ohranjevalnih ukrepih;
This option had not been included in the Impact Assessment at the time, which related to the more limited widening of the scope to "markets" as discussed above.
Ta možnost ni bila vključena v oceno učinka, ki je zadevala predvsem bolj omejeno razširitev področja uporabe na „trge“, kot je omenjeno zgoraj.
This option had to be discarded at an early stage, however, for several reasons.
To možnost je bilo treba že kmalu zavrniti iz več razlogov.
This option has a very large simplification potential.
Ta opcija ponuja velike možnosti za poenostavitev.
This option has all the advantages and disadvantages related to a soft law instrument.
Ta možnost vključuje vse prednosti in pomanjkljivosti nezakonodajnih pravnih instrumentov.
This option has an important advantage in terms of simplicity.
Pomembna prednost te možnost je enostavnost.
This option has been applied inconsistently between Member States and four of them have not implemented the waiver at all.
Ta možnost se v državah članicah ne uporablja skladno, štiri države članice pa sploh še niso uvedle opustitve.
This option has been assessed in detail looking at the current dispersed and fragmented EU development aid which represents the base for an improvement towards a more efficient and effective system.
Ta možnost je bila podrobneje ocenjena, pri čemer zdajšnja razpršena in razdrobljena razvojna pomoč EU predstavlja osnovo za izboljšanje obstoječega sistema v smeri njegove večje uspešnosti in učinkovitosti.
This option has been considered, but was discarded, in the agricultural policy area, where protection of GIs exclusively at EU level has been put in place through regulations.
Ta možnost je bila na področju kmetijske politike preučena, vendar zavržena, saj je bila na tem področju zaščita GO izključno na ravni EU določena s predpisi.
This option has been discarded as it risks overlapping with existing funding schemes such as European Social Fund and the Lifelong Learning Programme.
Ta možnost je bila izločena zaradi tveganja prekrivanja z obstoječimi programi financiranja, kot so Evropski socialni sklad in program vseživljenjskega učenja.
This option has been identified as being the most cost-effective by several impact assessments of similar legislative initiatives, such as MiFID and PRIPs.
Ta možnost je bila ocenjena kot najbolj stroškovno učinkovita v več analizah učinkov podobnih zakonodajnih pobud, kot sta direktiva MiFID in direktiva o PNPMV.
This option has clarity of focus and a well-developed intervention logic.
Ta možnost je jasno osredotočena z dobro razvito logiko posredovanja.
This option has got clear support from the European Parliament (Report Herrero) and the Commission services and has been developed in close cooperation with the SG, SJ and DG BUDG.
Ta ukrep ima popolno podporo Evropskega parlamenta (poročilo Herrero) in služb Komisije ter je bil razvit v tesnem sodelovanju z Generalnim sekretariatom, pravno službo in GD za proračun.
This option has important built-in cost inefficiencies linked to the ‘stop-and-go approach’.
Ta možnost ima pomembne stroškovne pomanjkljivosti, povezane s pristopom „ustavi in spelji“.
This option has not been chosen due to the problem of low compliance by "false" self-employed drivers.
Ta možnost ni bila izbrana zaradi majhne skladnosti „lažnih“ samozaposlenih voznikov.
This option has not yet been explored by the airlines in circumstances where the third parties can be identified: these include airport authorities, air traffic control, ground-handling service providers, travel agents and tour operators.
V to možnost se letalske družbe do danes niso poglabljale v primerih, ko so tretje osebe znane: med drugim letališki organi, službe za nadzor zračnega prometa, izvajalci storitev zemeljske oskrbe, turistične agencije ali organizatorji potovanj.
This option has positive economic impacts on the security of investment, the functioning of the single market and on entrepreneurship.
Ta možnost ima pozitivne ekonomske učinke na varnost naložb, delovanje enotnega trga in podjetništvo.
This option has served the community well for more than 20 years.
Ta možnost je Skupnosti dobro služila več kot 20 let.
This option has the highest potential to keep operating costs for businesses low and to minimize the administrative work, by providing flexible framework for a range of procedures, such as self-declarations, simple validation or partial certifications.
Ta možnost ima zelo visok potencial za ohranitev nizke ravni stroškov poslovanja podjetij in krčenje administrativnega dela na najnižjo možno mero, saj zagotavlja prilagodljiv okvir za vrsto postopkov, kot so samoprijava, enostavna potrditev ali delna certifikacija.
This option has the potential to achieve significant political impact at national and European level in contributing to the development of an enabling environment for volunteering in the European Union.
S to možnostjo se lahko doseže pomemben politični vpliv na nacionalni in evropski ravni v obliki prispevka k razvoju ugodnega okolja za prostovoljstvo v Evropski uniji.
This option has two baseline scenarios:
Ta možnost ima dva izhodiščna scenarija:
This option has, however, met with considerable opposition from all players consulted.
Vendar je tej možnosti resno nasprotovala večina udeležencev, s katerimi smo se posvetovali.
This option however is always subject to a case by case assessment on the necessity and proportionality of the measures taken.
Vendar je ta možnost vedno odvisna od tega, da se v vsakem primeru posebej ocenita nujnost in sorazmernost sprejetih ukrepov.
This option implies an introduction of specific targeted (i.e. limited) legislation against particularly dangerous large-scale attacks against information systems.
Ta možnost pomeni uvedbo posebne ciljne (tj. omejene) zakonodaje, ki preprečuje posebej nevarne obsežne napade na informacijske sisteme.
This option implies no action to address the status quo.
Ta možnost pomeni, da se obstoječi položaj ne rešuje s sprejetjem ukrepov.
This option implies that EU will not take any further action to fight this particular type of cyber crime.
Ta možnost pomeni, da EU ne bo sprejela novih ukrepov za boj proti tej vrsti kibernetske kriminalitete.
This option in isolation has therefore been discarded.
Zato je bila ta možnost kot posamezna možnost zavržena.
This option in particular favours a balanced approach in trade negotiations concerning biofuels, the use of available instruments in agricultural, rural development and cohesion policy, and the development of a coherent assistance package for developing countries.
Ta možnost še zlasti zagovarja uravnotežen pristop v tržnih pogajanjih glede biogoriv, uporabo razpoložljivih instrumentov v kmetijski politiki, politiki podeželskega razvoja ter kohezijski politiki ter razvoj skladnega paketa pomoči za države v razvoju.
This option includes a joint adoption of a proposal for a Council Recommendation on Joint Programming of research in the field of AD.
Ta možnost vključuje hkratno sprejetje predloga priporočila Sveta o skupnem načrtovanju raziskav na področju Alzheimerjeve bolezni.
This option includes a package of non-legislative and legislative actions which would effectively address the four policy objectives and give impetus to Article 20 EC.
Ta možnost vključuje sveženj nezakonodajnih in zakonodajnih ukrepov, ki bi učinkovito rešili štiri cilje politike in bi povečali pomen člena 20 ES.
This option includes a synergy between extending the use of supplementary indications and continuing the leeway as regards non-metric applications in the current practice of enforcing the directive, notably in sectors that use measurement for which no metric unit exists, e.g. binary measurements in computing (bits, bytes).
Ta možnost vključuje sinergijo med podaljšanjem uporabe dodatnih navedb in nadaljevanjem prožnosti pri sedanjem izvrševanju Direktive, kar zadeva uporabo nemetričnih enot, zlasti v sektorjih, v katerih metrične enote ne obstajajo, npr. binarne enote v računalništvu (biti, bajti).
This option includes all the elements of Option 3 (revision of the Basic Safety Standards Directive and integration of the other four Directives).
Ta možnost vključuje vse elemente možnosti 3 (revizija direktive o temeljnih varnostnih standardih in povezovanje drugih štirih direktiv).
This option includes ambitious measures that are not likely to be implemented in the short- and medium- term.
Ta možnost vključuje ambiciozne ukrepe, ki jih najverjetneje ne bo mogoče izvesti v kratkoročnem ali srednjeročnem obdobju.
This option includes and builds upon the features of option C.
Ta možnost vključuje in nadgrajuje značilnosti možnosti C.
This option includes four different actions focusing on interlinking and streamlining existing surveillance systems and mechanisms at Member States level.
Ta možnost vključuje štiri različne ukrepe, ki se osredotočajo na povezovanje in poenostavitev obstoječih sistemov in mehanizmov nadzorovanja na ravni držav članic.
This option includes the Option I proposals, but goes beyond and requires targeted amendments of the current EPBD to address the problem drivers more extensively.
Navedena možnost vključuje predloge možnosti I, vendar jih presega in zahteva ciljno usmerjene spremembe sedanje DEUS za obširnejšo obravnavo vzrokov težav.
This option includes the possible environmental modulation as described under option 3 above.
Ta možnost vključuje tudi možne spremembe pristojbin zaradi okoljskih vplivov, kakor je opisano pri možnosti 3 zgoraj.
This option introduces the necessary efficiency improvements and addresses all the objectives without the need to prioritise and provide scope to include new areas for cooperation, at a wider scale in a shorter time period.
Ta možnost uvaja potrebna izboljšanja učinkovitosti in obravnava vse cilje z enako prednostjo ter zagotavlja vključevanje novih področij za sodelovanje v širšem obsegu in v krajšem časovnem obdobju.
This option introduces the possibility for the Commission or the Agency to conduct 'system inspections' in non-EU countries, in order to assess whether their regulatory and enforcement system for clinical trials is equivalent to that in the EU.
Pri tej možnosti se Komisiji ali Agenciji omogoči izvajanje „sistemskega nadzora“ v tretjih državah, da bi se ocenilo, ali je njihov regulativni sistem in sistem izvajanja na področju kliničnih preskušanj enak sistemu v EU.
This option involves a programme for 2018-2020 that will keep the structure of the current programme while taking into account possible ways of harnessing the potential of ‘big data’ for producing statistics, the ESS Vision 2020 and the new needs of users.
Ta možnost vsebuje program za obdobje 2018–2020, ki bo ohranil strukturo sedanjega programa, pri tem pa upošteval možne načine za izkoriščanje potenciala „masovnih podatkov“ za pripravo statistike, Vizijo 2020 ESS in nove potrebe uporabnikov.
This option involves coming up with a comprehensive strategic research agenda and its complete implementation through multiple transnational calls for proposals, undertaken by several Participating States and implemented through a dedicated implementation structure (hereinafter referred to as DIS funding body).
V skladu s to možnostjo bi bilo treba oblikovati celovit strateški raziskovalni program in zagotoviti njegovo popolno izvajanje z več nadnacionalnimi razpisi za zbiranje predlogov, ki jih pripravi več sodelujočih držav in izvaja namenska izvedbena struktura (v nadaljnjem besedilu: organ namenske izvedbene strukture za financiranje).
This option involves developing cooperation between the Member States in order to ensure that consumers throughout the EU are able to use the collective redress mechanisms that are available in different Member States.
Ta možnost zajema razvijajoče se sodelovanje med državami članicami, s katero se potrošnikom po celi EU zagotovi uporaba mehanizmov kolektivnih odškodnin, ki so na voljo v različnih državah članicah.
This option involves extending the scope of the EUSD to benefits from those life insurance contracts which are competing with debt claims and investment funds.
Ta možnost vključuje razširitev področja uporabe Direktive o prihrankih na prejemke iz tistih pogodb o življenjskem zavarovanju, ki so konkurenčne dolžniškim terjatvam in naložbenim skladom.
This option involves no new EC action and relies on the existing national and EC measures to achieve adequate redress for consumers.
Ta možnost ne zajema nobenega ukrepa ES in se nanaša na obstoječe nacionalne ukrepe in ukrepe ES za doseganje ustreznih odškodnin za potrošnike.
This option involves non-regulatory measures which could be taken without any need to change the existing laws or to introduce new legislation at EU level.
Ta možnost obsega neregulativne ukrepe, ki bi jih bilo mogoče sprejeti brez sprememb obstoječih zakonov ali uvedbe nove zakonodaje na ravni EU.