natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The impact assessment considers the impact of both proposals, the Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and the Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the online and other distance sales of goods.
Ocena učinka obravnava učinke obeh predlogov, tj. direktive o nekaterih vidikih pogodb o dobavi digitalnih vsebin in direktive o nekaterih vidikih pogodb o spletni in drugi prodaji blaga na daljavo.
The impact assessment considers three options:
Ocena učinka obravnava tri možnosti:
The impact assessment considers three scenarios: no intervention, additional incentives for SEPA migration without setting an end-date and the impacts of setting a migration end-date.
Ocena vpliva obravnava tri scenarije: brez posredovanja, dodatne spodbude za prehod na SEPA brez določitve končnega datuma in učinki določitve končnega datuma prehoda.
The impact assessment considers two policy options:
Ocena učinka je proučila dve politični možnosti:
The Impact Assessment contains a detailed analysis of the current situation and the problems arising for the different stakeholders.
Presoja vpliva vsebuje podrobno analizo sedanjega stanja in probleme različnih zainteresiranih strani.
The Impact Assessment contains four chapters addressing these issues in detail.
Ocena učinka obsega štiri poglavja, ki podrobno obravnavajo ta vprašanja.
The impact assessment contains initial estimations on cost savings, based on factual and realistic assumptions concerning the "take up" of the universal registration document and the two proposed disclosure regimes for SMEs and for secondary issuers respectively.
Ocena učinka vsebuje prvotne ocene znižanja stroškov, ki temeljijo na dejanskih in realnih predpostavkah v zvezi z uvedbo univerzalnega registracijskega dokumenta in dveh predlaganih ureditev glede obveznosti razkritja informacij za MSP oziroma sekundarne izdajatelje.
The impact assessment contains initial estimations on cost savings, based on factual and realistic assumptions concerning the "take up" of the URD and the two proposed PDRs.
Ocena učinka vsebuje prvotne ocene zmanjšanja stroškov, ki temeljijo na dejanskih in realnih predpostavkah v zvezi z uvedbo univerzalnega registracijskega dokumenta in dveh predlaganih pravil glede sorazmernega razkritja.
The impact assessment deals with copyright authorisations necessary to make so-called "orphan works" available online as part of European and national digital libraries.
Ocena učinka obravnava dovoljenja avtorskih pravic, ki so potrebna za tako imenovana „osirotela dela“, ki so na voljo na spletu kot del evropskih in nacionalnih digitalnih knjižnic.
The Impact Assessment deals with the policy options relating to pesticide application equipment in section 4.1.2 entitled “Standards for control and certification of application equipment”.
Presoja vpliva obravnava možnosti politike, ki se nanašajo na opremo za nanašanje pesticidov iz oddelka 4.1.2 z naslovom „Standardi za nadzor in certifikacijo opreme za nanašanje“.
The impact assessment demonstrates that ambitious targets for the resources meeting the Union's international obligation of achieving maximum sustainable yield by 2015 can deliver important overall stock improvement leading to significant economic and social improvements.
Ocena učinka kaže, da je mogoče z ambicioznimi cilji v zvezi z viri, ki izpolnjujejo mednarodno obveznost Unije, da se do leta 2015 doseže največji trajnostni donos, zagotoviti veliko splošno izboljšanje staleža, kar bi omogočilo znatno gospodarsko in socialno izboljšanje.
The Impact Assessment demonstrates that Community financing is regarded the best option, as it is likely to be more cost-effective, even in comparison with the best-case scenario for the other options.
Ocena učinka kaže, da so finančna sredstva Skupnosti najboljša možnost, saj je takšno financiranje verjetno bolj stroškovno učinkovito od ostalih možnosti, tudi pri najboljšem možnem poteku ostalih dveh možnosti.
The impact assessment demonstrates that, given the current technical possibilities available to retailers, the option of a flexible ‘opt-in principle’ (option III.c) seems to be the most cost-effective and offers the best compromise between what is affordable today in terms of deactivation and what consumers seem ready to accept.
Ocena učinka kaže, da je glede na trenutne tehnične zmogljivosti trgovcev na drobno videti možnost prožnega „načela privolitve“ (možnost III.c) stroškovno najučinkovitejša in ponuja najboljši kompromis med tem, kar je danes na voljo v smislu onesposobitve, in tem, kar bi potrošniki lahko sprejeli.
The Impact Assessment described an optimistic and a realistic scenario, corresponding to the breadth of effects expected from the Action Plan.
V oceni učinka sta glede na obseg vplivov, ki jih je mogoče pričakovati po akcijskem načrtu, opisana optimističen in realen scenarij.
The impact assessment discusses the issue of slow migration to SEPA credit transfer (SCT) and SEPA direct debit (SDD), resulting in coexistence of national legacy instruments and SEPA payments.
Ocena vpliva obravnava vprašanje počasnega prehoda na SEPA kreditne prenose (SCT – SEPA credit transfer) in SEPA neposredne bremenitve (SDD – SEPA direct debit), katerega posledica je soobstoj obstoječih nacionalnih instrumentov in SEPA plačil.
The impact assessment discusses the three main issues identified as problems in the Commission's report on Regulation 2560/2001 from February 2008.
V oceni učinka so bila obravnavana tri glavna vprašanja, za katera je bilo v poročilu Komisije o Uredbi 2560/2001 iz februarja 2008 ugotovljeno, da so težavna.
The impact assessment discusses various options for six issues identified as problematic.
V oceni učinka so obravnavane različne možnosti za šest vprašanj, ki štejejo za problematična.
The impact assessment does not discuss whether reducing direct taxation and social security contributions might be more appropriate to achieve certain employment objectives.
Ne obravnava vprašanja, ali bi morda znižanje neposredne obdavčitve in prispevkov za socialno varnost bilo bolj primerno za dosego nekaterih ciljev zaposlovanja.
The impact assessment does not examine whether to extend the ESP, but how best to do this.
Ocena učinka ne preučuje, ali naj se evropski statistični program podaljša, temveč kako to najbolje storiti.
The impact assessment does not fully quantify the costs and benefits for Member States or operators – but suggests that both should be significantly lower than when the legislation was first introduced.
Presoja vpliva stroškov in koristi za države članice ali upravljavce ne opredeli v celoti, temveč zgolj omeni, da naj bi bili ti precej nižji kot ob uvedbi zakonodaje.
The impact assessment does not go into detail on the different sub-options that have been considered for each specific issue as this analysis has already been done in the context of the evaluation and is included in the final report of the evaluation.
Ocena učinka ne navaja podrobnosti o različnih podmožnostih za vsako specifično vprašanje, saj je ta analiza že bila izvedena v okviru ocenjevanja in je vključena v končno poročilo ocenjevanja.
The impact assessment does not however fully quantify the costs and benefits for Member States or operators – but suggests that both should be significantly lower than when the legislation was first introduced.
Presoja vpliva pa stroškov in koristi za države članice ali upravljavce ne opredeli v celoti, temveč zgolj omeni, da naj bi bili ti precej nižji kot ob uvedbi zakonodaje.
The impact assessment does show, however, that the expected profits in the extended term would suffice to finance the 20% set aside in favour of session musicians (see below).
Ocena učinka pa kaže, da bi pričakovani dobički v podaljšanem trajanju zadoščali za financiranje 20 % rezervacij v korist studijskih glasbenikov (glej spodaj).
The Impact Assessment draws on relevant reports issued by Union and international organisations such as the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Central Bank (ECB), Europol, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), and the FATF.
Ocena učinka temelji na zadevnih poročilih, ki so jih pripravile Unija in mednarodne organizacije, kot so Evropski bančni organ (EBA), Evropska centralna banka (ECB), Europol, Banka za mednarodne poravnave (BIS) in Projektna skupina za finančno ukrepanje (FATF).
The Impact Assessment elaborates these challenges and trade-offs, proposing some guidelines to address them, in particular, as regards Governance, the Selection of KICs, Human Resources, Intellectual Property, Degree awarding, and Funding.
Ocena učinka opredeljuje te izzive in alternative, predlaga nekaj smernic za njihovo obravnavo, še posebej glede upravljanja, izbora SZI-jev, človeških virov, intelektualne lastnine, podeljevanja diplom in financiranja.
The impact assessment equally indicates that it is likely that the cost effective potential is bigger, as the higher than assumed present oil prices seem to persist for the foreseeable future at least.
Ocena učinka kaže, da obstaja verjetnost, da je potencial stroškovne učinkovitosti večji, saj se zdi, da se sedanje cene nafte, ki so višje od predvidenih, vsaj v bližnji prihodnosti ne bodo spremenile.
The impact assessment establishes a rough estimate of one-off costs of EUR 171 million, and on going costs of around EUR 14 million per year.
Ocena učinka vsebuje grobo oceno stroškov, in sicer naj bi enkratni strošek znašal 171 milijonov EUR, tekoči stroški pa 14 milijonov EUR letno.
The impact assessment estimated that the additional costs of treatment would be a small fraction of one percent of overall health expenditures, and far outweighed by the benefits.
Ocena učinka kaže, da bi dodatni stroški zdravljenja znašali le 1 % celotnih izdatkov za zdravljenje in da bi jih koristi močno odtehtale.
The impact assessment estimates that overall GDP of developing countries "with climate policy" in 2020 should be a tiny fraction (1 %) lower than GDP "without climate change policy".
Presoja vpliva kaže, da bo skupni BDP držav v razvoju „s podnebno politiko“ v letu 2020 nekoliko nižji (1 %) kot BDP držav „brez podnebne politike“.
The impact assessment estimates that the proposal for a Regulation, in combination with the other two market access Regulations proposed at the same time, will reduce distortions of competition, improve the compliance of transport operators with social and road safety rules, and enable the Member States to reduce administrative costs by around EUR 190 million per annum1.
Ocena učinka predvideva, da bo predlagana uredba skupaj z obema hkrati predlaganima uredbama o dostopu na trg zmanjšala primere izkrivljanja konkurence, pripomogla k temu, da bodo prevozniki bolje upoštevali pravila na socialnem področju in pravila o varnosti v cestnem prometu, ter državam članicam ponudila možnost, da za 190 milijonov EUR na leto zmanjšajo upravne stroške1.
The impact assessment estimates the administrative burden of producing the accounting statement to be at least 1.28 mio €/year.
Ocena učinka upravno obremenitev za pripravo bilance stanja ocenjuje vsaj na 1,28 milijona EUR letno.
The impact assessment evaluate these effects, quantifying them where possible.
Ocena vplivov ovrednoti te vplive in jih izrazi v številkah, kjer je to možno.
The impact assessment evaluated each option regarding the extent to which it mitigates the risks, its impact on compliance costs of EU MS, industry and the Commission, and the wider non quantifiable impacts (social, economic and environmental).
V oceni učinka je bila vsaka možnost obravnavana glede na to, v kolikšni meri blaži tveganja, glede na njen učinek na stroške uskladitve med državami članicami EU, sektorjem in Komisijo ter glede na širše vplive, ki jih količinsko ni mogoče opredeliti (družbene, gospodarske in okoljske).
The impact assessment examined 5 options to deal with the identified problems, i.e. insufficient clarity and transparency of PSI re-use rules, locked information resources, excessive charges, lack of a level playing field, insufficient enforcement of re-use provisions, and inconsistent approaches adopted by individual Member States.
V oceni učinka je bilo obravnavanih pet možnosti za reševanje opredeljenih problemov, tj. nezadostna jasnost in preglednost pravil o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja, nedostopnost informacijskih virov, pretirano zaračunavanje, neenaki konkurenčni pogoji, nezadostno izvrševanje določb o ponovni uporabi in neusklajeni pristopi, ki so jih sprejele posamezne države članice.
The impact assessment examined several options:
V oceni učinka je bilo preučenih več možnosti:
The impact assessment examined three policy options:
V oceni vpliva so bile preverjene tri politične možnosti:
The impact assessment examined two possible options: no policy change, or a legislative initiative.
Pri oceni učinka sta bili proučeni dve možnosti: brez spremembe politike ali zakonodajna pobuda.
The impact assessment examines a range of options to achieve the objective of finding the best regulatory model for delivering a single market in e-communications through consistent and effective regulation while respecting the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.
Ocena učinka preučuje različne možnosti, da se najde najboljši regulativni model za vzpostavitev enotnega trga na področju e-komunikacij z doslednimi in učinkovitimi predpisi, pri čemer upošteva načelo subsidiarnosti in načelo sorazmernosti.
The impact assessment examines five possible options.
Pri oceni učinka je bilo proučenih pet možnosti:
The impact assessment examines four high level policy options:
Ocena učinka preučuje štiri možnosti politike na visoki ravni:
The Impact Assessment examines four main options.
V oceni učinka so preučene štiri glavne možnosti.
The impact assessment examines specific provisions for the retail sector (section 5.4) as this is an area where important concerns are often raised.
Ocena učinka preučuje posebne določbe za sektor trgovine na drobno (oddelek 5.4), saj gre za področje, kjer so pogosti pomembni pomisleki.
The Impact Assessment examines the baseline scenarios, policy options and their impacts for eight topics regrouped under three chapters, namely (i) ensuring wider access to content, (ii) adapting exceptions to digital and cross-border environment and (iii) achieving a well-functioning marketplace for copyright.
V oceni učinka so obravnavani osnovni scenariji ter možnosti politike in njihovi učinki za vsako od osmih področij, združenih po skupinah v tri poglavja, in sicer (i) zagotavljanje širšega dostopa do vsebin, (ii) prilagoditev izjem digitalnemu in čezmejnemu okolju ter (iii) oblikovanje dobro delujočega trga za avtorske pravice.
The impact assessment examines the following options: 1) No action at EU level; 2) Ensure greater transparency on the regulation of the professions; 3) Option 2 and launch a mutual evaluation exercise; 4) Option 2 and introduce a specific regime for professions regulated in only one Member State.
V oceni učinka so preučene naslednje možnosti: 1) brez ukrepanja na ravni EU; 2) zagotavljanje večje preglednosti glede reguliranja poklicev; 3) druga možnost in uvedba medsebojnega ocenjevanja; 4) druga možnost in uvedba posebnega sistema za poklice, regulirane samo v eni državi članici.
The impact assessment examines two groups of options to deal with: (a) issues pertaining to the insufficiency of governance and transparency standards applied by certain collecting societies, often resulting in weaknesses in their financial management; (b) issues stemming from the lack of preparedness of certain authors' collecting societies to grant online multi-territorial licences in view of the requirements associated with this kind of activity and the perceived legal uncertainty, making the repertoire aggregation of musical works more difficult.
V okviru ocene učinka sta bili preučeni dve skupini možnosti, ki jih je treba obravnavati: (a) vprašanja v zvezi z neustreznostjo standardov upravljanja in preglednosti, ki jih uporabljajo nekatere kolektivne organizacije, posledica česar so pogosto pomanjkljivosti v njihovem finančnem poslovanju; (b) vprašanja, ki izvirajo iz nepripravljenosti nekaterih kolektivnih organizacij avtorjev, da bi izdajali spletne večozemeljske licence, in sicer zaradi zahtev, povezanih s to vrsto dejavnosti, in pravne negotovosti, zaradi česar je združevanje repertoarjev glasbenih del težje.
The impact assessment examines two sets of policy options, aimed at facilitating the clearance of rights (i) for the online transmissions of TV and radio programmes; and (ii) for digital retransmissions of TV and radio programmes.
Ocena učinka obravnava dva sklopa možnosti politike, katerih namen je olajšati prenos pravic (i) za spletne prenose televizijskih in radijskih programov; in (ii) za digitalne retransmisije televizijskih in radijskih programov.
The Impact Assessment explains in detail what the extent of these problems is and why they appear.
V oceni učinka je podrobno pojasnjeno, kakšen je obseg teh težav in zakaj se pojavljajo.
The impact assessment explains that, given the urgency to boost the development of Europe's digital libraries and archives and its capacity to foster search and indexing technologies, the focus of the legislative proposal will be on works which are published in the form of books, journals, newspapers, magazines or other writings, including works embedded in them,1 as well as audio, audiovisual and cinematographic works.
Ocena učinka razlaga, da je ob upoštevanju nujnosti za povečanje razvoja evropskih digitalnih knjižnic in arhivov ter sposobnosti za krepitev tehnologij iskanja in indeksiranja poudarek zakonodajnega predloga na delih, ki so objavljena kot knjige, revije, časopisi in druga besedila, vključno z deli, ki jih ta dela vsebujejo1, ter tudi avdio, avdiovizualna in kinematografska dela.
The impact assessment explains the rationale for replacing the existing EUSF Regulation by a new one, the policy choices proposed, and the impacts of these policy choices.
Presoja vpliva utemeljuje razloge za nadomestitev obstoječe uredbe o Solidarnostnem skladu z novo, za predlagano politično izbiro in posledice te izbire.
The impact assessment explored different policy options to clarify and extend the scope of the Directive to new categories of professionals.
Ocena učinka je preučila različne možnosti politike, da bi pojasnila področje uporabe Direktive in ga razširila na nove kategorije strokovnjakov.
The Impact Assessment explores how effective the different options are at addressing the multiple objectives.
Ocena učinka obravnava učinkovitost različnih možnosti za uresničevanje raznovrstnih ciljev.
The impact assessment explores options for a more targeted approach, based on differentiation of sectors depending on their degree of exposure to carbon leakage risk – slight modification of the current criteria; applying a uniform factor to all; differentiating sectors into 4 groups.
Ocena učinka proučuje možnosti bolj usmerjenega pristopa na podlagi razlikovanja sektorjev glede na njihovo stopnjo izpostavljenosti tveganju selitve virov CO2, in sicer z majhno spremembo trenutnih meril, uporabo enotnega faktorja za vse sektorje in razvrščanjem sektorjev v štiri skupine.
The impact assessment explores the associated options, described below:
V presoji vpliva so preučene možnosti, ki so opisane v nadaljevanju:
The impact assessment focused on and analysed the impacts of three main policy options:
Ocena učinka se je osredotočila na učinke treh glavnih možnosti politike in jih analizirala:
The impact assessment focused on five issues: eligibility to act as a depositary, criteria for delegating custody, liability for the loss of financial instruments held in custody, remunerations of UCITS managers and sanctions for breaches of the UCITS rules.
Ocena učinka se je osredotočila na pet vprašanj: upravičenost delovanja v vlogi depozitarja, merila za prenos nalog, povezanih s hrambo, odgovornost za izgubo finančnih instrumentov, ki se hranijo, plačila upraviteljev KNPVP in sankcije za kršitve pravil KNPVP.
The Impact Assessment focuses exclusively on the area of out-of-court dispute resolution.
Ocena učinka se osredotoča izključno na področje izvensodnega reševanja sporov.
The impact assessment focuses on the following three areas of the revision having substantial impacts:
Pri oceni učinka se je osredotočila na naslednja tri področja revizije, ki imajo pomembne učinke:
The impact assessment focuses on the issues which have proved to be the most controversial and are likely to raise different reaction between the MSs, and require additional financial investments, namely:
Ocena učinka se osredotoča na vprašanja, ki so se izkazala za najbolj sporna in za katera obstaja verjetnost, da bodo botrovala različnim odzivom v državah članicah ter zahtevala dodatne finančne naložbe, in sicer:
The Impact Assessment focuses on those fleet segments which have horse mackerel among their five most important species.
Ocena učinka je osredotočena na tista plovila iz flote, pri katerih je šur ena od petih najpomembnejših vrst, ki jih lovijo.
The impact assessment for a North Sea multi-annual plan has taken place in the context of the new CFP and the redrafting of the Technical Measures regulations.
Ocena učinka večletnega načrta za Severno morje je bila izvedena v okviru nove skupne ribiške politike in preoblikovanja uredb o tehničnih ukrepih.
The impact assessment for the ESF Regulation mainly addressed the scope of the instrument and one specific aspect of simplification.
Ocena učinka uredbe o ESS v glavnem obravnava področje uporabe instrumenta in en posebni vidik poenostavitve.
The impact assessment for the European Heritage Label showed that one of the main weaknesses of the current intergovernmental initiative is that the sites are selected independently by participating countries with no overseeing body at European level.
Ocena učinka znaka evropske dediščine je pokazala, da je ena največjih pomanjkljivosti sedanje medvladne pobude neodvisna izbira spomenikov, ki jo izvajajo države udeleženke brez nadzornega organa na evropski ravni.
The impact assessment for the present programme was based on a meta-evaluation from the previous programme’s evaluations (2012 interim evaluation for the ISA Programme and the EIS implementation review) and on Member States’ feedback.
Ocena učinkov tega programa je temeljila na meta-oceni na podlagi prejšnjih ocen programa (vmesna ocena programa ISA iz leta 2012 in pregled izvajanja evropske strategije interoperabilnosti) ter na povratnih informacijah držav članic.
The Impact Assessment for the proposal carried out an analysis of the options for ensuring the consistent application of the Directive in the initial phase and concluded that Commission review was the most appropriate.
Z oceno učinka predloga je bila izvedena analiza možnosti za omogočanje dosledne uporabe direktive v začetni fazi, na podlagi katere je bilo sklenjeno, da je pregled Komisije najbolj ustrezen.
The impact assessment for these options is mainly based on the conclusions of the Copenhagen Economics study.
Ocena učinka teh možnosti temelji predvsem na ugotovitvah študije inštituta Copenhagen Economics.
The impact assessment for this implementation package has largely built on the impact assessment carried out for the New Legislative Framework.
Ocena učinka za ta izvedbeni paket se je v veliki meri opirala na oceno učinka, izvedeno za nov zakonodajni okvir.
The impact assessment for this implementation package has largely built on the impact assessment carried out for the New Legislative Framework.
Ocena učinka za ta izvedbeni paket se je v veliki meri opirala na oceno učinka, izvedeno za novi zakonodajni okvir.
The impact assessment for this proposal examined the following range of options: no policy change, self-regulation, co-regulation, soft law and targeted regulation in four specific areas: voice roaming, per second billing, SMS roaming and data roaming.
Pri oceni učinka za ta predlog so bile preučene naslednje možnosti: brez spremembe politike, samoregulacija, koregulacija, nezavezujoči pravni instrumenti in usmerjena regulacija na štirih posebnih področjih: gostovanje za govorne storitve, zaračunavanje po sekundnem intervalu, gostovanje za storitve SMS in gostovanje za podatkovne storitve.