natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Impact Assessment Board issued its opinion on 22 June 2008 providing a number of recommendations for improvements of the draft report, which have been incorporated in the final version.
Odbor za oceno učinka je izdal mnenje dne 22. junija 2008 v katerem je podal številna priporočila za izboljšanje osnutka sporočila, ki je bil vključen v zadnjo različico.
The Impact Assessment Board of the European Commission assessed the draft version of the impact assessment report prepared by the relevant service and approved it subject to some modifications5.
Odbor Evropske komisije za oceno učinka je ocenil osnutek poročila o oceni učinka, ki so ga pripravile ustrezne službe, in potrdil njegovo vsebino z nekaj spremembami5.
The impact assessment board of the European Commission6 assessed a draft version of this impact assessment in August 2007 and approved it subject to some modifications.
Odbor za oceno učinka Evropske komisije6 je avgusta 2007 ocenil osnutek te ocene učinka in potrdil njegovo vsebino z nekaj popravki.
The Impact Assessment Board provided opinions on drafts of the impact assessment on 23 July 2008, 1 October 2008 and 4 November 2008.
Odbor za oceno učinka je predložil mnenja o osnutkih ocene učinka 23. julija 2008, 1. oktobra 2008 in 4. novembra 2008.
The Impact Assessment Board provides independent quality control and helps develop methodology.
Odbor za oceno učinka zagotavlja neodvisen nadzor kakovosti in pomaga pri razvoju metodologije.
The Impact Assessment Board stresses that the number of analyses of competitiveness impacts increased considerably in 2013 (by 30%) compared with 2012.
Odbor za oceno učinka je poudaril, da se je število ocen učinka na konkurenčnost znatno povečalo v primerjavi z letom 2012 (za 30 %).
The Impact Assessment Board stresses that the number of analyses of competitiveness impacts increased considerably in 2013 (by 30%) compared with 2012.
Odbor za oceno učinka je poudaril, da se je število ocen učinka na konkurenčnost znatno povečalo v primerjavi z letom 2012 (za 30 %).
The impact assessment board supported the impact assessment.
Odbor za oceno učinka je podprl oceno učinka.
The Impact Assessment Board treated the draft Impact Assessment in its meeting on 16 April 2008 and gave comments to improve the text in its opinions of 22 April 2008 and 26 June 2008 after a resubmitted Impact Assessment.
Odbor za oceno učinka je osnutek ocene učinka obravnaval na zasedanju 16. aprila 2008 in podal svoje predloge za izboljšanje besedila v mnenjih z dne 22. aprila 2008 in 26. junija 2008, potem ko je bila ocena učinka ponovno predložena.
The Impact Assessment Board will be an important tool for achieving this and sufficient resources should be made available to ensure that all impact assessments include an assessment of the effects on sustainable development.
Odbor za presojo vpliva bo pomembno orodje za doseganje navedenega cilja, pri čemer mora biti na voljo dovolj sredstev za zagotovitev, da vse presoje vpliva vključujejo presojo vpliva na trajnostni razvoj.
The Impact Assessment Board will continue to make sure that the potential social and employment impacts are fully taken into account before proposals are made.
Odbor za oceno učinka bo pred izdelavo predlogov še naprej preverjal, ali v celoti upoštevajo možne učinke na socialnem in zaposlovalnem področju.
The Impact Assessment Board's opinion called for certain crucial points to be clarified, given the importance of this issue.
Tudi odbor za oceno učinka je pozval, da je treba glede na pomen tega vprašanja natančneje preučiti nekatere pomembne točke.
The Impact Assessment Board's opinion on the impact assessment was issued on 2 July 2010.
Odbor za oceno učinka je mnenje o oceni učinka sprejel 2. julija 2010.
The Impact Assessment Board's opinions on the report have been published together with this proposal, the final Impact Assessment report and the executive summary of the report.
Mnenja odbora za oceno učinka o poročilu so objavljena skupaj s tem predlogom, končnim poročilom o oceni učinka in njegovim povzetkom.
The Impact Assessment builds on analysis undertaken within the Commission, supported by several structured (Oil Supply Group, Berlin Fossil Fuels Forum) and informal consultations with stakeholders and a formal public consultation.
Ocena učinka temelji na analizi, ki jo je izvedla Komisija in je podprta z več strukturiranimi (Skupina za preskrbo z nafto, Berlinski forum o fosilnih gorivih) ter neformalnimi posvetovanji z zainteresiranimi stranmi ter formalnim javnim posvetovanjem.
The Impact Assessment builds on earlier work, in particular the impact assessment prepared for the January 2007 Commission Communication on 'Sustainable Power Generation from Fossil Fuels'1 and the Communication itself which cleared a number of key issues regarding:
Ocena učinka temelji na že opravljenem delu, zlasti na oceni učinka, pripravljeni za sporočilo Komisije iz januarja 2007 o „trajnostni proizvodnji električne energije iz fosilnih goriv“1, in na samem sporočilu, ki je odgovorilo na številna ključna vprašanja:
The Impact Assessment builds on the following external studies6:
Ocena učinka temelji na naslednjih zunanjih študijah6 :
The impact assessment builds on the interim evaluations of the current programmes5, which confirmed the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the programmes, but they also identified some shortcomings and room for improvement.
Ocena učinka temelji na vmesnih ocenah sedanjih programov5, ki so potrdile splošno uspešnost in učinkovitost programov, vendar so ugotovile tudi nekaj pomanjkljivosti in nekaj možnosti za izboljšanje.
The impact assessment builds on the results of an external study entitled "Evaluation of the EU Legislative Framework in the Field of Medicated Feed” carried out in 2009/2010 by the Food Chain Evaluation Consortium (FCEC).
Ocena učinka temelji na rezultatih zunanje študije z naslovom „Ocena zakonodajnega okvira EU na področju medicirane krme“ („Evaluation of the EU Legislative Framework in the Field of Medicated Feed“), ki jo je v letih 2009 in 2010 izvedel Konzorcij za vrednotenje prehranske verige (v nadaljnjem besedilu: FCEC).
The impact assessment builds on various studies and surveys carried out during 2003-2008 including two consultations with stakeholders as well as on regular contacts with Member States and social partners.
Ocena učinka temelji na različnih študijah in raziskavah, izvedenih v letih 2003–2008, vključno z dvema posvetovanjema z zainteresiranimi stranmi ter rednimi stiki med državami članicami in socialnimi partnerji.
The impact assessment built on various studies carried out during 2004, 2005 and 20061 It was the result of a contract with an external consultant.
Temelji na različnih študijah, opravljenih v letih 2004, 2005 in 20061. Izhajala je iz pogodbe z zunanjim svetovalcem.
The impact assessment came to the conclusion that a Council Recommendation as proposed in option B2 would enhance the development of evidence-based, comprehensive and consistent policies against ESL in Member States.
Sklep ocene učinka je, da bi priporočilo Sveta iz možnosti B2 spodbudilo razvoj z dejstvi podprtih, celovitih in usklajenih politik boja proti osipu v državah članicah.
The Impact Assessment can be found on DG Trade's website.
Ocena učinka je na voljo na spletišču GD za trgovino.
The impact assessment carried out a high-level cost assessment on the basis of different technologies.
Ocena učinka je izvedla oceno stroškov na visoki ravni na podlagi različnih tehnologij.
The impact assessment carried out at the time remains valid, and another assessment is not necessary.
Ocena učinka, ki je bila opravljena takrat, je še vedno veljavna, zato nova ocena ni potrebna.
The impact assessment carried out before the reform examined the likely consequences of cuts in tariffs comparable to those agreed recently.
V oceni učinka, opravljeni pred prenovo, so bile proučene verjetne posledice zmanjšanj tarif, ki so primerljiva z nedavno dogovorjenimi zmanjšanji.
The Impact Assessment carried out by the Commission addresses five policy issues that require action: the extension of the scope of the Regulation to include articles and materials treated with biocidal products; the improvement of procedures for product authorisation with the possibility to authorise certain products at the Community level; the introduction of mandatory data-sharing at product authorisation and active substance approval stage along the principles of the REACH Regulation; a clarification on data requirements with a combination of data waiving with the use of existing information and a new approach for low-risk biocidal products; a partial harmonisation of fee structure to encourage the development of more new active substances and the retention of more existing active substances.
Ocena učinka, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, obravnava pet vprašanj politike, kjer so potrebni ukrepi: razširitev področja uporabe Uredbe zaradi vključitve izdelkov in snovi, tretiranih z biocidnimi pripravki; izboljšanje postopkov za izdajanje dovoljenj za pripravke z možnostjo odobritve določenih pripravkov na ravni Skupnosti; uvedba obvezne souporabe podatkov v fazi odobritve pripravkov in aktivnih snovi v skladu z načeli Uredbe REACH; pojasnitev zahtev za podatke ter kombinacija odstopanja od zahteve za podatke z uporabo obstoječih informacij in novega pristopa za biocidne pripravke z manjšim tveganjem; delna uskladitev strukture pristojbin za spodbuditev razvoja več novih aktivnih snovi in ohranitve več obstoječih aktivnih snovi.
The Impact Assessment carried out by the Commission addresses five policy issues that require action: the extension of the scope of the Regulation to include articles and materials treated with biocidal products; the improvement of procedures for product authorisation with the possibility to authorise certain products at the Union level; the introduction of mandatory data-sharing at product authorisation and active substance approval stage along the principles of the REACH Regulation; a clarification on data requirements with a combination of data waiving with the use of existing information and a new approach for low-risk biocidal products; a partial harmonisation of fee structure to encourage the development of more new active substances and the retention of more existing active substances.
Ocena učinka, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, obravnava pet vprašanj politike, kjer so potrebni ukrepi: razširitev področja uporabe uredbe zaradi vključitve izdelkov in snovi, tretiranih z biocidnimi pripravki; izboljšanje postopkov za izdajanje dovoljenj za pripravke z možnostjo odobritve določenih pripravkov na ravni Unije; uvedba obvezne souporabe podatkov v fazi odobritve pripravkov in aktivnih snovi v skladu z načeli Uredbe REACH; pojasnitev zahtev za podatke ter kombinacija odstopanja od zahteve za podatke z uporabo obstoječih informacij in novega pristopa za biocidne pripravke z manjšim tveganjem; delna uskladitev strukture pristojbin za spodbuditev razvoja več novih aktivnih snovi in ohranitev več obstoječih aktivnih snovi.
The Impact Assessment carried out by the Commission discards a number of options at the outset (most notably, the introduction of a new supranational legal form; harmonisation of company law related to establishment of subsidiaries with only SMEs as founders or both in the form of public and private limited liability companies) due to their infeasibility and/or a lack of support from stakeholders.
Na podlagi ocene učinka, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, je bilo že na začetku zavrnjenih več možnosti (zlasti uvedba nove nadnacionalne pravne oblike; uskladitev prava družb na področju ustanavljanja hčerinskih družb, katerih ustanovitelji so le MSP, ali v obliki delniških družb in družb z omejeno odgovornostjo), ker so neizvedljive in/ali ker jih zainteresirane strani niso podprle.
The impact assessment carried out by the Commission showed that the best way to implement enhanced approximation of the levels of taxation of commercial gas oil consists in an increase of the minimum level for commercial gas oil, given that it combines the reduction of distortions of competition and resulting fuel tourism as well as of overall consumption.
Ocena učinka, ki jo je opravila Komisija, je pokazala, da je najboljši način za dosego povečanega približevanja ravni obdavčitve plinskega olja za komercialne namene zvišanje najnižje ravni za plinsko olje za komercialne namene, pod pogojem, da združuje zmanjšanje izkrivljanja konkurence in povzroča bencinski turizem ter tudi celotno porabo.
The Impact Assessment carried out by the Commission states that, although banks will have to meet "some" increase in the operational costs, the overall cost of operations and of drafting recovery and resolution plans will be "negligible" or "immaterial"6.
Iz ocene učinka, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, je razvidno, da bodo banke sicer morale plačati nekoliko višje stroške poslovanja, vendar pa bodo skupni stroški poslovanja in priprave načrtov sanacije in reševanja zanemarljivi ali nepomembni6.
The impact assessment carried out during the review process of the IPPC directive and related legislation has assessed the impacts of the package of measures proposed.
V oceni učinka, izvedeni med pregledom Direktive CPNO in s tem povezane zakonodaje, so ocenjeni učinki predlaganega svežnja ukrepov.
The impact assessment carried out for the review of the regulatory framework builds on those considerations expressed by stakeholders and proposes to introduce provisions on the deployment of small cells.
Ocena učinka, opravljena za pregled regulativnega okvira, izhaja iz navedenih pomislekov, ki so jih izrazile zainteresirane strani, in predlaga uvedbo določb za uvedbo malih celic.
The impact assessment carried out for this legislative proposal has shown that a positive impact on competitiveness of European industry with a net economic gain and the best cost/benefit result can be obtained with this kind of focused procurement obligation.
Presoja vpliva, ki je bila izvedena za ta zakonodajni predlog, je pokazala, da je mogoče s takšno osredotočeno obvezo naročil ustvariti pozitiven vpliv na konkurenčnost evropske industrije z neto ekonomskim dobičkom ter najboljšim razmerjem med stroški in koristjo.
The impact assessment carried out in accordance with the established Guidelines essentially covered principles of compensation and assistance in the event of cancellations and delays, rules of accessibility, non-discrimination and assistance to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility; quality standards and information obligations, rules for handling complaints and for monitoring compliance.
Ocena učinka, izvedena v skladu z oblikovanimi smernicami, je zajemala predvsem načela odškodnine in pomoči v primeru odpovedi in zamud, pravila dostopnosti, nediskriminacijo ter pomoč invalidom in osebam z omejeno mobilnostjo, standarde kakovosti in obveznosti v zvezi z obveščanjem ter pravila za obravnavo pritožb in spremljanje skladnosti.
The impact assessment carried out in conformity with the Guidelines essentially covered: principles of liability of operators in the event of death or injury of passengers comparable to other modes of transport; principles of compensation and assistance in the event of cancellations and delays; rules on accessibility, non-discrimination and assistance for disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility; quality standards and information obligations; rules on complaint handling and monitoring of compliance.
Ocena učinka, izvedena v skladu s smernicami, je zajemala predvsem: načela odgovornosti prevoznikov v primeru smrti ali poškodbe potnikov, primerljiva z drugimi načini prevoza; načela odškodnine in pomoči v primeru odpovedi in zamud; pravila o dostopnosti, nediskriminaciji in pomoči za invalide in osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo; standarde kakovosti in obveznosti v zvezi z obveščanjem; pravila o obravnavanju pritožb ter spremljanju skladnosti.
The impact assessment carried out to prepare this proposal covered the recasting of both the rules on admission to the occupation and those on access to the market, in view of their close links and their overlaps.
Ocena učinka, izvedena za pripravo tega predloga, se je nanašala na celotno prenovitev pravil o dovoljenju za opravljanje dejavnosti in dostopu na trg, ob upoštevanju njihove tesne povezanosti in prekrivanja.
The Impact Assessment clearly supports a legally binding EU solution for IGS protection based on minimum harmonisation.
Ocena učinka jasno podpira pravno zavezujočo rešitev EU za zaščito na podlagi ZJS na podlagi minimalnega usklajevanja.
The impact assessment combines quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Ocena učinka združuje kvantitativno in kvalitativno analizo.
The impact assessment compared status quo (referred to as option 1) with four other policy options (referred to as options 2-5).
V oceni učinka je bila ohranitev sedanjega stanja (možnost 1) primerjana s štirimi drugimi možnostmi politike (možnosti 2–5).
The impact assessment compared three alternative policy scenarios:
V okviru ocene učinka so se primerjali trije alternativni scenariji politike:
The impact assessment compares options for expressing the targets in terms of primary or final energy consumption and concludes in favour of the latter, as it does not discriminate between different types of renewable energy and accounting in primary energy gives greater weight to thermal and nuclear energy and therefore increases in these energy sources would make the achievement of any given renewable energy share harder to achieve.
V presoji vpliva so primerjane možnosti izražanja ciljev s primarno ali končno porabo energije, pri čemer je dana prednost zadnji možnosti, saj pri navedbi končne porabe energije ni razlikovanja med različnimi vrstami obnovljive energije, medtem ko je pri navedbi primarne porabe energije večji poudarek na toplotni in jedrski energiji, zaradi povečanja teh virov energije pa bi bilo težje doseči kateri koli ciljni delež obnovljive energije.
The impact assessment comprises a more detailed and technical description of the objectives and the expected results.
Podrobnejši tehnični opis ciljev in pričakovanih rezultatov je naveden v presoji vplivov.
The impact assessment comprises a more detailed and technical description of the objectives and the expected results.
Presoja vpliva vključuje podrobnejši in tehnični opis ciljev in pričakovanih rezultatov.
The impact assessment concerning Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 considered three options:
Ocena učinka, ki se nanaša na Uredbo (ES) št. 852/2004, je upoštevala tri možnosti:
The impact assessment concerning Regulation No 11 considered two options:
Ocena učinka, ki se nanaša na Uredbo št. 11, je upoštevala dve možnosti:
The Impact Assessment concerns a draft proposal for a Regulation that would replace the current recovery plan and set long-term management objectives and implementing methods concerning a fishery for the northern hake.
Ocena učinka zadeva osnutek predloga uredbe, ki bi nadomestila sedanji načrt za obnovitev ter določila dolgoročne cilje za upravljanje in metode za izvajanje ribolova osliča iz severnega staleža.
The Impact Assessment concerns a draft proposal that will set long-term management objectives and implementing methods concerning the Baltic salmon stocks (Salmo salar, L.).
Ocena učinka zadeva osnutek predloga, s katerim se bodo opredelili dolgoročni cilji upravljanja in načini izvajanja v zvezi s staleži lososa v Baltskem morju (Salmo salar, L.).
The Impact Assessment concerns a draft proposal that would set long-term management objectives and implementing methods concerning a fishery for anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in the Bay of Biscay.
Ocena učinka se nanaša na osnutek predloga, s katerim se bodo določili dolgoročni cilji upravljanja in metode za izvajanje ribolova na sardona (Engraulis encrasicolus) v Biskajskem zalivu.
The Impact Assessment concerns a draft proposal that would set long-term management objectives and implementing methods concerning the fisheries for the Western stock of the Atlantic horse mackerel.
Ocena učinka se nanaša na osnutek predloga, s katerim se bodo določili dolgoročni cilji upravljanja in metode za izvajanje ribolova na zahodni stalež šura.
The Impact Assessment concerns Directive 80/181/EEC on units of measurement.
Ocena učinka se nanaša na Direktivo 80/181/EGS o merskih enotah.
The Impact Assessment concerns the revision of Directive 2000/13/EC providing for compulsory information on the label of foods.
Ocena učinka se nanaša na revizijo Direktive 2000/13/ES, ki določa obvezne podatke na oznakah za živila.
The Impact Assessment concerns the revision of Directive 90/496/EEC which provides the framework for the presentation of nutrition information on food labels.
Ocena učinka se nanaša na revizijo Direktive 90/496/ES, ki določa okvir za predstavljanje informacij o hranilni vrednosti na oznakah za živila.
The impact assessment concerns the scheduled review of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund ("the EGF Regulation"), which Article 20 provides that the Commission may submit a proposal to review the Regulation on the basis of its first annual report.
Ocena učinka zadeva predvideni pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji („Uredba ESPG“), katere člen 20 določa, da lahko Komisija predlaga pregled Uredbe na podlagi svojega prvega letnega poročila.
The impact assessment concluded in favour of a standalone framework for defining the funds and the rules applying to them, to facilitate national and cross border fund raising including the development of a European 'brand' of social entrepreneurship funds supported by strong transparency measures.
Na podlagi ocene učinka je bila prednost namenjena samostojnemu okviru za določanje skladov in predpisov, ki veljajo zanje, da bi se spodbudilo zbiranje sredstev na nacionalni in čezmejni ravni, vključno z oblikovanjem evropske „znamke“ skladov za socialno podjetništvo s podporo odločnih ukrepov v zvezi s preglednostjo.
The impact assessment concluded in favour of extending the scope of the Directive, under specific conditions, to non-fully qualified professionals and notaries.
V oceni učinka se ugotavlja, da bi bilo pod posebnimi pogoji področje uporabe direktive treba razširiti na strokovnjake in notarje, ki niso popolnoma kvalificirani.
The impact assessment concluded on this point that requiring Member States to introduce criminal sanctions for the most serious market abuse offences was essential to ensure the effective implementation of the Union policy on market abuse.
V oceni učinka je bilo glede tega ugotovljeno, da je bila zahteva po uvedbi kazenskih sankcij za najhujše kršitve v zvezi z zlorabo trga v državah članicah bistvena za zagotavljanje učinkovitega izvajanja politik Unije glede zlorabe trga.
The Impact Assessment concluded that a legislative proposal applicable to travel by air with decentralised collection of PNR data for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences and other serious crime was the best policy option (combination of B1, C1 and D1).
Iz ocene učinka izhaja, da je bil zakonodajni predlog, ki ureja področje letalskega prevoza z decentraliziranim zbiranjem podatkov PNR za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja, preiskovanja in pregona terorističnih in hudih kaznivih dejanj, najboljša možnost politike (kombinacija B1, C1 in D1).
The impact assessment concluded that a targeted revision of the legal basis by implementing all the proposed measures will bring considerable added value since it will:
Na podlagi ocene učinka se je ugotovilo, da bo ciljno usmerjena revizija pravne podlage z izvajanjem vseh predlaganih ukrepov ustvarila znatno dodano vrednost, ker bo:
The impact assessment concluded that an EU Regulation with detailed rules would have the most positive impacts and would provide for the best way forward to achieve the objectives for the EU.
V oceni učinka je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi imela uredba EU s podrobnimi pravili najbolj pozitivne učinke in bi zagotovila najboljši način za doseganje ciljev EU.