natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The proposal uses the term “ordinary procedure” loosely, without making this distinction.
V predlogu se izraz "redni postopek" uporablja ohlapno in brez tega razlikovanja.
The proposal uses the ‘split-level approach’ originally introduced at the request of the European Parliament and used in other legislation for EU type-approval of motor vehicles.
Predlog uporablja „pristop dvojne ravni“, prvotno uveden na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta in uporabljen pri drugih zakonodajnih aktih s področja EU-homologacije motornih vozil.
The proposal uses the “split-level approach” is already used in other pieces of legislation in the area of EU type-approval of motor vehicles.
Predlog uporablja „pristop dvojne ravni“, ki se že uporablja v drugih zakonodajnih aktih s področja EU-homologacije motornih vozil.
The proposal uses the “split-level approach” that has originally been introduced at the request of the European Parliament and used in other pieces of legislation in the area of EU type approval of motor vehicles.
Predlog uporablja „pristop dvojne ravni“, ki je bil prvotno uveden na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta in uporabljen pri drugih zakonodajnih aktih s področja EU-homologacije motornih vozil.
The proposal uses the “split-level approach” that has originally been introduced at the request of the European Parliament and used in other pieces of legislation.
Predlog uporablja „pristop dvojne ravni“, ki je bil prvotno uveden na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta in uporabljen pri drugih zakonodajnih aktih.
The proposal uses the “split-level approach” whereby the Directive’s fundamental provisions will be adopted under co-decision, while the technical specifications and adaptation to technical progress will be adopted under comitology, in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Predlog temelji na „večstopenjskem pristopu“, pri katerem bodo osnovne določbe direktive sprejete v postopku soodločanja, tehnične specifikacije in prilagoditev tehničnemu napredku pa po postopku komitologije v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom, predvidenim v členu 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
The proposal wants to facilitate cross–border coordination between Member States by providing a framework for better allocation of resources and better planning.
Cilj predloga je vzpostaviti okvir za učinkovitejše dodeljevanje virov in boljše načrtovanje, s čimer bi olajšali čezmejno sodelovanje držav članic.
The proposal was a recast merging the existing students (2004/114/EC) and researchers (2005/71/EC) Directives.
Predlog je prenovitev, ki združuje obstoječi direktivi o študentih (2004/114/ES) in raziskovalcih (2005/71/ES).
The proposal was accompanied by a legislative financial statement.
Predlogu je bil priložen zakonodajni finančni izkaz.
The proposal was accompanied by an Impact Assessment in form of a Commission staff working document (SEC(2008)2436/2).
Predlog je spremljala ocena učinka v obliki delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije (SEC(2008)2436/2).
The proposal was accompanied by an Impact Assessment2.
Predlogu je bila priložena ocena učinka2.
The proposal was adopted by the Commission on 6 April 2005 and sent to the European Parliament and the Council on 26 April 2005.
Komisija je predlog sprejela 6. aprila 2005 in ga 26. aprila 2005 predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal was adopted by the Council on 12 February 2002 as Directive 2002/10/EC.
Predlog je sprejel Svet dne 12. februarja 2002 kot Direktivo 2002/10/ES.
The proposal was adopted by the Council on 29 July 1999 as Directive 1999/81/EC.
Predlog je sprejel Svet dne 29. julija 1999 kot Direktivo 1999/81/ES.
The proposal was adopted.
Predlog je bil sprejet.
The proposal was also presented to the PROCIV group (civil protection).
Predlog je bil prav tako predstavljen skupini PROCIV (civilna zaščita).
The proposal was also published without any prior consultation of the European social partners, who sent a joint letter to the Commission asking to be properly consulted in accordance with the Article 154 (2) TFEU.
Predlog je bil objavljen tudi brez predhodnega posvetovanja z evropskimi socialnimi partnerji, ki so Komisiji poslali skupno pismo, v katerem so jo pozvali k ustreznemu posvetovanju v skladu s členom 154(2) PDEU.
The proposal was ambitious and robust, but its magnitude led negotiations in the Council to stall.
Predlog je bil ambiciozen in odločen, vendar so zaradi njegovega obsega pogajanja v Svetu zastala.
The proposal was amended in May 2006.
Maja 2006 so bile predlagane spremembe tega predloga.
The proposal was approved by the European Parliament at its first reading with some modifications.
Evropski parlament je odobril predlog na prvi obravnavi z nekaj spremembami.
The proposal was approved by the European Parliament at its first reading with some modifications.
Predlog je z nekaj spremembami odobril Evropski parlament na prvi obravnavi.
The proposal was approved.
Predlog je bil sprejet.
The Proposal was based on Article 95 (1) and Article 175 (1) of the EC Treaty.
Podlaga za predlog sta bila člena 95(1) in 175(1) Pogodbe ES.
The proposal was criticised for not quantifying the value of its effects and the resulting financial and administrative burden for the Member States.
Glede predloga so bile podane kritike, da v njem ni količinsko opredeljena vrednost njegovih učinkov in nastalo finančno in upravno breme za države članice.
The proposal was developed in close cooperation with a specialists working group under the auspices of the Committee on Excise Duty (established under Directive 2008/118/EC).
Predlog je bil pripravljen v tesnem sodelovanju z delovno skupino strokovnjakov pod okriljem Odbora za trošarine (ustanovljenega z Direktivo 2008/118/ES).
The proposal was developed in close cooperation with a specialists working group under the auspices of the Excise Committee (which itself was established under Directive 92/12/EEC).
Predlog je bil pripravljen v tesnem sodelovanju z delovno skupino izvedencev pod okriljem Odbora za trošarine (ki je bil ustanovljen z Direktivo 92/12/EGS).
The proposal was developed on the basis of a broad range of contributions from Member States and interested parties provided on various occasions, including a general online public consultation12.
Predlog je nastal na podlagi več različnih prispevkov držav članic in zainteresiranih strani ob različnih priložnostih, vključno s splošnimi javnimi spletnimi posvetovanji12.
The proposal was discussed in the Council mainly under the Czech and the Swedish Presidencies but negotiations have been difficult and no position was reached on the text in the Council.
O predlogu so razpravljali tudi v Svetu, predvsem med češkim in švedskim predsedovanjem, vendar so bila pogajanja težavna in v Svetu ni bilo sprejeto stališče o besedilu.
The proposal was drafted in the light of consultation of the members of the existing European Advisory Committee on Statistical Information in the Economic and Social spheres and of the Statistical Programme Committee.
Predlog je bil pripravljen po posvetovanju s člani obstoječega Evropskega svetovalnega odbora za statistične informacije na gospodarskem in socialnem področju in Odbora za statistični program.
The proposal was drawn up in compliance with the rules of international maritime law and in accordance with the definitions and recommendations in the IMO Code for the Investigation of Marine Accidents (Articles 2 and 3).
Predlog je bil oblikovan v skladu s pravili mednarodnega pomorskega prava in opredelitvami ter priporočili Kodeksa IMO o preiskovanju pomorskih nezgod in incidentov (člena 2 in 3).
The proposal was forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council on 3 October 2008.
Predlog je bil 3. oktobra 2008 predložen Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal was initially aimed at allowing SMEs to derogate from the EU requirements for food producers to apply self-checks (HACCP) along their production processes, and it was unanimously rejected by the Council (26 against, one abstention).
Prvotni namen predloga je bil omogočiti MSP odstopanje od zahtev EU za proizvajalce živil, da preko proizvodnih procesov izvajajo samopreverjanje (HACCP), vendar je bil predlog v Svetu soglasno zavrnjen (26 proti, en vzdržan).
The proposal was never adopted, because the ADN agreement was not concluded as expected, and was withdrawn in 2004.
Predlog ni bil nikoli sprejet, ker sporazum AND v nasprotju s pričakovanji ni bil sklenjen, leta 2004 pa je bil umaknjen.
The proposal was not accepted, by 16 votes against to 13 votes in favour.
Predlog s 16 glasovi proti in 13 za ni bil sprejet.
The proposal was not addressed by any Council Presidency and is now obsolete, as the existing Directive 1999/45/EC will be repealed on 1 June 2015.
Predloga ni obravnavalo nobeno predsedstvo Sveta, zdaj pa je zastarel, saj bo obstoječa Direktiva 1999/45/ES 1. junija 2015 razveljavljena.
The proposal was not adopted, mainly because of some Member States’ concerns regarding their VAT receipts.
Predlog ni bil sprejet predvsem zaradi nekaterih držav članic, ki so jih skrbeli njihovi davčni dohodki.
The proposal was not adopted, mainly because of some Member States’ concerns regarding their VAT receipts.
Predlog ni bil sprejet predvsem zaradi nekaterih držav članic, ki so jih skrbeli njihovi prihodki od DDV.
The proposal was not submitted for impact assessment as it derives from international obligations and has no significant cross-cutting impact.
Predlog ni bil predložen v presojo vplivov, saj izhaja iz mednarodnih obveznosti in nima večjega medsektorskega vpliva.
The proposal was part of a package of reviews relating to the health of plants, health of animals, official controls concerning plants, animals, food and feed, and Union expenditures for those policies.
Predlog je bil del svežnja revizij, povezanih z zdravjem rastlin, zdravjem živali, uradnim nadzorom rastlin, živali, živil in krme ter odhodki Unije za navedene politike.
The proposal was prepared on the basis of the evaluation of the application of the current Directive in Member States and after a wide consultation process with Member States, UNHCR, NGOs and other relevant stakeholders.
Predlog je bil pripravljen na podlagi ocene uporabe veljavne direktive v državah članicah in po obsežnem posvetovanju z državami članicami, Visokim komisariatom Združenih narodov za begunce, nevladnimi organizacijami in drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi.
The proposal was prepared on the basis of the evaluation of the application of the current Directive in Member States.
Predlog je bil pripravljen na podlagi ocene uporabe veljavne direktive v državah članicah.
The proposal was published before the deadline for transposing the 2014 Enforcement Directive and before any assessment of its implementation could be carried out.
Predlog je bil objavljen, preden se je iztekel rok za prenos direktive o izvrševanju iz leta 2014 in preden je bila lahko opravljena ocena njenega izvajanja.
The proposal was rejected.
Predlog je bil zavrnjen.
The proposal was revised by the Commission in 2007 to drop the transferability element which had been opposed by some as technically difficult and potentially burdensome or open to abuse.
Komisija je leta 2007 predlog ponovno pregledala in izpustila element prenosljivosti, ki so mu nekatere strani nasprotovale zaradi tehnične zahtevnosti ter morebitnega obremenjevanja ali možnosti zlorabe.
The proposal was split into two parts with the first part extending the current period of the transitional measures for two years until 1 July 2007, leaving the second part to be subject to further discussions at EP and Council level.
Predlog je bil razdeljen na dva dela, prvi del podaljšuje tekoče obdobje prehodnih ukrepov za dve leti do 1. julija 2007, drugi del pa je predmet nadaljnjih razprav na ravni EP in Sveta.
The proposal was submitted to the Council and the European Parliament on 28th July 2006.
Predlog je bil Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu predložen 28. julija 2006.
The proposal was submitted to the Council and the European Parliament on 28th July 2006.
Predlog je bil Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu predložen 28. julija 2006.
The proposal was supported by Council and Parliament and entered into force on 15 June 20073.
Predlog sta podprla Svet in Parlament ter je stopil v veljavo 15. junija 20073.
The proposal was then discussed and adopted by the European Parliament and the Council on 29 April 2004.
O predlogu so potekle razprave, nato pa sta ga Evropski parlament in Svet 29. aprila 2004 sprejela.
The proposal was to amend the section opinion as follows:
Na podlagi predloga se mnenje strokovne skupine spremeni tako:
The proposal was transmitted to Parliament and the Council on 19 March 2004.
Predlog je bil 19. marca 2004 posredovan Parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal was transmitted to the Council and to the European Parliament (COM(2002) 759 final – 2002/0306(COD)) on the 24 December 2002
Predlog je bil posredovan Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu (COM(2002) 759 končno – 2002/0306(COD)) dne 24. decembra 2002.
The proposal was transmitted to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on 16 October 2009 (2009/0153/CNS).
Predlog je bil 16. oktobra 2009 posredovan Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu ter Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru (2009/0153/CNS).
The Proposal was transmitted to the European Parliament and the Council on 19 July 2006.
Predlog je bil 19. julija 2006 posredovan Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal was transmitted to the European Parliament and to the Council on 13 April 2005.
Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu je bil predlog posredovan 13. aprila 2005.
The proposal was withdrawn (C(2015)8001) and replaced by a new proposal on 21 October 2015 (COM(2015)603).
Predlog je bil umaknjen (C(2015) 8001) in nadomeščen z novim predlogom z dne 21. oktobra 2015 (COM(2015) 603).
The proposal was withdrawn in 2004.
Predlog je bil leta 2004 umaknjen.
The proposal which conception is driven by the privacy by design principles is proportionate in terms of the right to protection of personal data in that it does not require the collection and storage of more data for a longer period than is absolutely necessary to allow the system to function and meet its objectives.
Predlog, katerega zasnova temelji na načelih vgrajene zasebnosti, je sorazmeren v smislu pravice do varstva osebnih podatkov, saj ne zahteva zbiranja in shranjevanja več podatkov za daljše obdobje, kot je nujno potrebno za delovanje sistema in izpolnjevanje njegovih ciljev.
The proposal which is the subject of the present Opinion is solely concerned with the modifications necessary to embed the powers of ESMA into the provisions of the 2009 regulation.
Predlog uredbe, ki jo obravnava to mnenje, se nanaša le na spremembe, ki so bile potrebne za to, da se pristojnosti ESMA dodajo med določbe uredbe iz leta 2009.
The proposal which is the subject of this impact assessment will be to simplify the current systems for vehicle safety but also introduce new requirements, where technically feasible and economically justifiable, to improve the safety and environmental performance of new vehicles.
Predlog, ki je predmet te ocene učinka, je namenjen poenostavitvi sedanjih sistemov za varnost vozil ter uvedbi novih zahtev, kadar so tehnično in ekonomsko izvedljive, za izboljšanje varnosti in okoljske uspešnosti novih vozil.
The proposal will abolish certain steps which citizens have to go through in order to have a judicial decision recognised and enforced abroad.
S tem predlogom bodo odpravljeni nekateri postopki, ki jih morajo državljani opraviti, da je sodna odločba priznana v tujini in se tam tudi izvrši.
The proposal will address these problems by imposing obligations on Member States to remove restrictions on the use of cross-border services, by applying the principle of non-discrimination and by requiring greater transparency and information from services providers.
Predlog želi te težave rešiti z uvedbo obveznosti za države članice, da odstranijo omejitve pri uporabi čezmejnih storitev z uporabo načela nediskriminacije in z zahtevo za več transparentnosti in informacij od ponudnikov storitev.
The proposal will aim at improving and reinforcing the implementation, application and enforcement in practice of the Posting of Workers Directive, including measures to prevent and sanction any abuse and circumvention of the applicable rules.
Cilj predloga je izboljšati in okrepiti izvajanje, uporabo in izvrševanje v praksi direktive o napotitvi delavcev na delo, vključno z ukrepi za preprečevanje in kaznovanje kakršne koli zlorabe veljavnih predpisov in izogibanja tem predpisom.
The proposal will aim to enhance the identification of irregular third-country nationals within the EU as well as to ensure the effective implementation of the revised Dublin Regulation by providing fingerprint evidence to determine the Member State responsible for examining an application of international protection.
Cilj predloga bo izboljšati prepoznavanje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav v EU ter zagotoviti učinkovito izvajanje spremenjene dublinske uredbe, in sicer z zagotovitvijo dokazov v obliki prstnih odtisov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito.
The proposal will aim to make tax rules simpler, reduce compliance costs and remove tax obstacles which companies currently suffer when they operate cross-border.
Namen predloga je poenostavitev pravil, znižanje stroškov usklajevanja in odprava davčnih ovir, s katerimi se podjetja zdaj srečujejo pri čezmejnem sodelovanju.
The proposal will aim to make tax rules simpler, reduce compliance costs and remove tax obstacles which companies currently suffer when they operate cross-border.
S tem predlogom naj bi poenostavili davčna pravila, zmanjšali stroške usklajevanja in odstranili davčne ovire, s katerimi se podjetja trenutno srečujejo pri čezmejnem poslovanju.
The proposal will aim to: 1) improve access to employment opportunities and facilitate job creation by establishing EURES as matching placement and recruitment tool for labour mobility across Europe; 2) expand EURES to support the new "Your First EURES Job" scheme; 3) reflect the ECJ jurisprudence on placement services which will need to be opened up to private employment services while widening the range of EURES partners.
Cilj predloga bo: 1) izboljšanje dostopa do možnosti zaposlovanja in omogočanje ustvarjanja novih delovnih mest z vzpostavitvijo službe EURES kot orodja za povezovanje prostih delovnih mest z ustreznimi iskalci zaposlitve, namenjenega mobilnosti delovne sile po Evropi; 2) razširitev službe EURES v podporo novi pobudi „Prva zaposlitev EURES; 3) prikaz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije v zvezi s storitvami posredovanja zaposlitev, ki jih je treba omogočiti tudi zasebnim agencijam za zaposlovanje v okviru povečevanja števila partnerjev službe EURES.
The proposal will allow a wider use of vaccination and therefore a potential increased market for the pharmaceutical companies who produce the inactivated vaccines against bluetongue.
Predlog bo dopuščal širšo uporabo cepljenja in zato možnost za večji trg za farmacevtske družbe, ki proizvajajo inaktivirana cepiva proti bolezni modrikastega jezika.
The proposal will allow Member States to contribute more effectively to Community civil protection assistance and to benefit from improved coordination and cooperation in a stronger legal framework.
Predlog bo omogočal državam članicam, da bodo učinkoviteje prispevale k civilni zaščiti Skupnosti in imele koristi od izboljšanega usklajevanja in sodelovanja v okviru trdnejše pravne ureditve.
The proposal will allow the Commission to approve higher EAFRD contribution rates for the countries concerned, for as long as they are under the support mechanisms.
Predlog Komisiji omogoča, da sprejme povečanje deleža prispevkov EKSRP za zadevne države, dokler so vključene v mehanizem pomoči.
The proposal will allow the continuation of the implementation of the programmes, injecting additional money mobilised by the EIB and other international financial institutions into the economy.
Predlog bo omogočil nadaljnje izvajanje programov, in sicer s prilivom dodatnega denarja, ki ga bodo zbrale EIB in druge mednarodne finančne ustanove, v gospodarstvo.
The proposal will allow the continuation of the implementation of the programmes, injecting money into the economy while at the same time help reduce the burden on public expenditure for Member States affected by natural disasters.
Predlog bo omogočil nadaljevanje izvajanja programov z dovajanjem denarja gospodarstvu, obenem pa bo pomagal zmanjšati breme javnih izdatkov za države članice, ki so jih prizadele naravne nesreče.
The proposal will allow the continuation of the implementation of the programmes, injecting money into the economy while at the same time help reduce the burden on public expenditure.
Predlog bo omogočil nadaljevanje izvajanja programov z dovajanjem denarja gospodarstvu, obenem pa bo pomagal zmanjšati breme javnih izdatkov.
The proposal will allow the continuation of the implementation of the programmes, injecting money into the economy while at the same time help reduce the burden on public expenditure.
Ta predlog bo omogočil nadaljnje izvajanje programov, saj prinaša finančne prilive gospodarstvu, obenem pa bo pripomogel k zmanjšanju bremena na strani javnih izdatkov.
The proposal will also aim to simplify and rationalise the general framework under which the Commission and the Member States cooperate under the provisions of the Regulation.
Cilj predloga je tudi poenostavitev in racionalizacija splošnega okvira, v katerem Komisija in države članice sodelujejo v skladu z določbami Uredbe.
The proposal will also be consistent with the general EU framework on copyright and will be without prejudice to any rights and obligations according to copyright law.
Predlog bo usklajen tudi s splošnim okvirom EU o avtorskih pravicah in ne bo posegal v pravice in obveznosti v skladu z avtorskim pravom.
The proposal will also contribute to the environmental protection priority by helping to prevent the risk of maritime disasters.
Poleg tega bo predlog s preprečevanjem pomorskih nesreč prispeval k prednostni nalogi varovanja okolja.
The proposal will also contribute to the policy goals outlined in the Commission's communication "A Digital Agenda for Europe"8 by supporting the implementation of intelligent transport systems.
Predlog bo prispeval tudi k ciljem politike, navedenim v sporočilu Komisije „Evropska digitalna agenda“8, s podpiranjem izvajanja inteligentnih prometnih sistemov.
The proposal will also enhance gender equality prescribed by Article 23 of the Charter, promote the best interests of the child principle in the asylum procedures, in line with Article 24 of the Charter, and reinforce the principle of non-discrimination as provided in Article 21 of the Charter.
Predlog bi poleg tega povečal enakost spolov iz člena 23 Listine, podprl načelo upoštevanja koristi otroka v azilnih postopkih v skladu s členom 24 Listine in okrepil načelo nediskriminacije iz člena 21 Listine.
The proposal will also ensure a harmonised implementation of international obligations following from the FCTC, which is binding for the EU and all Member States, and a consistent approach to non-binding FCTC commitments, if there is a risk of diverging national transposition.
Predlog bo zagotovil tudi usklajeno izvajanje mednarodnih obveznosti, ki izhajajo Okvirne konvencije, ki je zavezujoča za EU in vse države članice, in dosleden pristop k nezavezujočim zavezam Okvirne konvencije, če obstaja nevarnost, da bi bile različno prenesene v nacionalne zakonodaje.
The proposal will also ensure coherence with two recently adopted Regulations:
Predlog bo zagotovil tudi skladnost z dvema nedavno sprejetima uredbama, in sicer z
The proposal will also facilitate the electronic exchange of information and further introduction of digital technologies.
Predlog bo tudi olajšal elektronsko izmenjavo informacij in nadaljnje uvajanje digitalnih tehnologij.