natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The proposal would oblige the installation of Stage II petrol vapour recovery equipment (i) at new and refurbished stations above 500m3 throughput per annum of petrol; (ii) require retrofitting of existing stations with a throughput above 3000 m3 by 2020; and (iii) require all new or substantially refurbished stations situated under residential accommodation to equip with Stage II controls irrespective of size; (iv) no obligation to install automatic monitoring of Stage II PVR equipment but permit a longer period between inspections if it is installed.
Če bi se predlog sprejel, bi bila namestitev opreme za rekuperacijo bencinskih hlapov na drugi stopnji obvezna (i) v novih in preurejenih bencinskih servisih s količino pretočenega motornega bencina nad 500 m3 na leto; (ii) potrebno bi bilo dodatno opremljanje obstoječih servisov s količino pretočenega motornega bencina več kot 3000 m3 do leta 2020; (iii) vsi novi ali bistveno preurejeni bencinski servisi pod stanovanji bi se morali opremiti z mehanizmi za zadrževanje hlapov na drugi stopnji ne glede na njihovo velikost; (iv) namestitev samodejnega spremljanja opreme za rekuperacijo bencinskih hlapov na drugi stopnji bi bila neobvezna, vendar bi bilo treba omogočiti daljše obdobje med pregledi, če bi se oprema namestila.
The proposal would provide a legal framework in which the Excise Movement Control System (ECMS) could function.
Predlog naj bi predstavljal pravni okvir za uvedbo sistema za gibanje in nadzor trošarinskega blaga (EMCS).
The proposal would reduce this interval to one or two months.
V okviru, predvidenem v predlogu, naj bi se ta razpon skrajšal na en do dva meseca.
The proposal would respond to the fact that the vast majority of larger clinical trials are conducted in a pan-European setting.
Predlog bi upošteval dejstvo, da se velika večina večjih kliničnih preskušanj izvaja po vsej Evropi.
The proposal would significantly reduce traders' compliance costs while granting consumers a high level of protection.
Tako bi predlog bistveno znižal stroške usklajevanja za trgovce, hkrati pa potrošnikom zagotovil visoko raven varstva.
The proposal would strongly contribute to the better functioning of the internal market through harmonisation and streamlining, reducing the burden on business, in particular SMEs, wishing to trade cross-border.
Predlog bi veliko prispeval k boljšemu delovanju notranjega trga z usklajevanjem in racionalizacijo, s čimer bi razbremenil podjetja, zlasti MSP, ki želijo trgovati čez mejo.
The proposal would support some 20 projects, covering both gas and electricity, as long as the beneficiaries fulfil key criteria to ensure the effective realisation of the projects.
Predlog bi podprl približno 20 projektov, ki zajemajo zemeljski plin in električno energijo, pod pogojem, da upravičenci izpolnjujejo ključna merila, ki zagotavljajo učinkovito izvedbo projektov.
The proposal would therefore not conflict with Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
Predlog zato ne bi bil v nasprotju z Direktivo Sveta 92/43/EGS o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst.
The proposal would therefore significantly reduce traders' compliance costs while granting consumers a high level of protection.
Predlog bi zato bistveno znižal stroške usklajevanja za trgovce, hkrati pa potrošnikom zagotovil visoko raven varstva.
The proposal would therefore strengthen its organisational function and lead to efficiency gains.
Predlog bi zato okrepil svojo organizacijsko funkcijo in prinesel večjo učinkovitost.
The proposal would, besides creating new practical tools to enhance administrative cooperation (common forms, formats, channels and organisation), introduce two important new elements that the Commission considers indispensable to reinforce EU action at international level against tax fraud and evasion.
Predlog bi poleg oblikovanja novih praktičnih pripomočkov za krepitev upravnega sodelovanja (skupni obrazci, oblike, poti in organizacija) uvedel dve novi prvini, ki sta za Komisijo nujni za okrepitev mednarodnega delovanja EU proti davčni goljufiji in utaji.
The proposal – COM (2002) 443 final – 2002/0222 (COD) was adopted by the Commission on 11th September 2002 and was transmitted to the European Parliament and to the Council on 12th September 2002.
Komisija je 11. septembra 2002 sprejela predlog – COM (2002) 443 končni – 2002/0222 (COD) in ga 12. septembra 2002 posredovala Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal – COM (2006)16 – 2006/0006(COD) was adopted by the Commission on 31 January 2006 and sent to Parliament and the Council on 31 January 2006.
Komisija je predlog – COM(2006) 16 – COD/2006/0006 – sprejela 31. januarja 2006 in ga 31. januarja 2006 predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal – COM(2005) 592 – 2005/0241 (COD) – was adopted by the Commission on 23 November 2005 and was sent to the European Parliament and to the Council on 13 February 2006.
Komisija je predlog – COM(2005) 592 – COD/2005/0241 – sprejela 23. novembra 2005 in ga 13. februarja 2006 predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal – COM(2005) 593 – 2005/0242 (COD) – was adopted by the Commission on 23 November 2005 and was sent to the European Parliament and to the Council on 30 January 2006.
Komisija je predlog – COM(2005) 593 – COD/2005/0242 – sprejela 23. novembra 2005 in ga 30. januarja 2006 predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu .
The proposal — COM(2007) 697 – 2007/0247 (COD) — was adopted by the Commission on 13 November 2007 and was sent to the European Parliament and to the Council on 16 November 2007.
Komisija je predlog – COM(2007) 697 – COD/2007/0247 – sprejela 13. novembra 2007 in ga 16. novembra 2007 predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal — COM(2007) 698 – 2007/0248 (COD) — was adopted by the Commission on 13 November 2007 and was sent to the European Parliament and to the Council on 15 November 2007.
Komisija je predlog – COM(2007) 698 – 2007/0248 (COD) – sprejela 13. novembra 2007 in ga 15. novembra 2007 predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The proposal's aim is to continue to limit consumer exposure to pharmacologically active substances intended to be used in veterinary medicinal products for food producing animals and residues thereof in foodstuffs of animal origin through Community procedures.
Namen predloga je, da se prek postopkov Skupnosti nadaljuje omejevanje izpostavljenosti potrošnikov farmakološko aktivnim snovem, namenjenim za uporabo v zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini za živali za proizvodnjo živil, in njihovim ostankom v živilih živalskega izvora.
The proposal's ambition should not, however, lead us to overlook the timing of the proposal to develop the strategy and adopt the flanking legislative measures.
Kljub drznosti predloga ne smemo pozabiti na obdobje, v katerem se je začela priprava strategije in spremljajočih zakonodajnih ukrepov.
The proposal's approach to fundamental rights, particularly the right to privacy, is inappropriate and could clash on certain aspects.
Obravnavanje človekovih pravic, zlasti pravice do zasebnosti, je neprimerno v več pogledih.
the proposal's European added value,
dodana vrednost predloga na evropski ravni,
The proposal's goals are to:
Cilji predloga Komisije so:
The proposal's objective of sustainable development is consistent with the Community's environmental policy, especially the elements of that policy dealing with protecting natural habitats and preserving natural resources.
Cilj predloga v zvezi s trajnostnim razvojem je v skladu z okoljsko politiko Skupnosti, zlasti s tistimi deli te politike, ki obravnavajo varstvo naravnih habitatov in ohranjanje naravnih virov.
The proposal's objective of sustainable development is consistent with the Community's environmental policy, especially the elements of that policy dealing with protecting natural habitats and preserving natural resources.
Cilj predloga v zvezi s trajnostnim razvojem je v skladu z okoljsko politiko Skupnosti, zlasti z deli te politike, ki obravnavajo varstvo naravnih habitatov in ohranjanje naravnih virov.
The proposal's objectives and content
1. Cilji in vsebina predloga
The proposal's objectives and content
Cilji in vsebina predloga
The proposal's objectives are consistent with the European Union's environmental policy, especially the objectives of the Habitat Directive, the Water Framework Directive and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
Cilji predloga so skladni z okoljsko politiko Evropske unije, zlasti s cilji direktive o habitatih, okvirne direktive o vodah in okvirne direktive o morski strategiji.
The proposal's one-sided assessment should be deleted, and the purpose behind the measures proposed should be highlighted.
Enostranske ocene v tej točki bi bilo treba črtati, obenem pa poudariti namen predlaganih ukrepov.
The proposal's rules on the applicable law come into play only in international situations, that is to say, for example, those where the spouses are of different nationalities or live in different Member States or in a Member State of which at least one of them is not a national.
Pravila iz predloga o pravu, ki se uporablja, pridejo v poštev samo v mednarodnih primerih, kot npr. ko imata zakonca bodisi različno državljanstvo bodisi ko prebivata v različnih državah članicah ali v državi članici, katere državljanstva nima vsaj eden od zakoncev.
The proposal's scope is confined to N1 vehicles.
Področje uporabe predloga je omejeno na vozila kategorije N1.
The proposal, adopted by the Commission on 4 December 2008, aims at establishing rights of passengers when travelling by bus and coach in order to improve the attractiveness of and confidence in passenger transport by road.
Cilj predloga, ki ga je Komisija sprejela 4. decembra 2008, je določiti pravice potnikov pri potovanju z avtobusom, da se poveča privlačnost cestnega potniškega prevoza in zaupanje v to vrsto prevoza.
The proposal, adopted by the Commission on 4 December 2008, aims at establishing rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterways in order to improve the attractiveness of and confidence in passenger transport by ship.
Cilj predloga, ki ga je Komisija sprejela 4. decembra 2008, je določiti pravice potnikov pri potovanju po morju in celinskih plovnih poteh, da se poveča privlačnost prevoza s potniškimi ladjami in zaupanje v to vrsto prevoza.
The proposal, although accepted by the rapporteur, was opposed by Ms Schweng.
POROČEVALEC se je strinjal z amandmajem.
The proposal, amending the 2003 Directive on IORPs, aims at: laying down detailed rules on the governance of IORPs, supervisory powers over IORPs, information to be provided by IORPs to supervisors, information to be provided by IORPs to members and beneficiaries, investment by IORPs, IORP depositaries, cross-border transfer of IORPs and cross-border activity of IORPs.
Predlog, ki spreminja Direktivo iz leta 2003 o institucijah za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje, je namenjen: določitvi podrobnih pravil v zvezi z upravljanjem institucij, pooblastil za nadzor institucij, informacij, ki jih morajo institucije zagotavljati nadzornikom, informacij, ki jih morajo institucije zagotavljati članom in upravičencem, naložb institucij, depozitarjev institucij, čezmejnega prenosa institucij in čezmejnih dejavnosti institucij.
The proposal, and in particular the establishment of a vulnerability assessment, complements the Schengen evaluation mechanism established by Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013.7 The Schengen evaluation mechanism is intended to maintain mutual trust among Member States.
Predlog, zlasti uvedba ocene ranljivosti, dopolnjuje schengenski ocenjevalni mehanizem, ki je bil vzpostavljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 1053/2013.7 Schengenski ocenjevalni mehanizem je namenjen ohranjanju medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami.
The proposal, by means of an information system, by an adult to meet a child who has not reached the age of sexual consent under national law according to the relevant provisions of national law, for the purpose of committing any of the offences referred to in Articles 2(a) and 4(a), where this proposal has been followed by material acts leading to such a meeting.
nagovarjanje odrasle osebe prek sredstev informacijskega sistema za srečanje z otrokom, ki v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo še ni dopolnil starosti, ko lahko pristane na spolnost, da bi ta oseba storila katero koli kaznivo dejanje, opredeljeno v členu 2(a) in členu 4(a), pri čem so nagovarjanju sledila materialna dejanja, ki so imela za posledico takšno srečanje.
The proposal, by means of information and communication technology, by an adult to meet a child who has not reached the age of sexual consent under national law, for the purpose of committing any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 (3) and Article 5 (6), where this proposal has been followed by material acts leading to such a meeting, shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least two years.
Nagovarjanje odrasle osebe z uporabo informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij za srečanje z otrokom, ki še ni dopolnil starosti, ko lahko pristane na spolnost v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, da bi ta oseba storila katero koli kaznivo dejanje iz člena 3(3) in člena 5(6), pri čemer so nagovarjanju sledila materialna dejanja, ki so imela za posledico takšno srečanje, se kaznuje z najvišjo zaporno kaznijo najmanj dveh let.
The proposal, considered by the EESC to be necessary in order to reduce the number of road casualties, has been judged by the European Parliament to be over-prescriptive and as a result has, in the name of the subsidiarity principle, been emptied of its most vigorous, binding provisions.
Ta predlog, za katerega EESO meni, da je potreben za zmanjšanje števila žrtev na cestah, je po mnenju Evropskega parlamenta preveč omejevalen, zato so bile v imenu načela subsidiarnosti iz njega izvzete najbolj ključne obvezujoče določbe.
The proposal, falling under a special legislative procedure is currently under discussion in the Council.
Navedeni predlog, za katerega velja poseben zakonodajni postopek, je trenutno v razpravi v Svetu.
The proposal, following the New Legal Framework, introduces new and stricter criteria for the notification of bodies carrying out third party tasks in the process of assessment and verification of constancy of performance.
Predlog na podlagi novega pravnega okvira uvaja nova in strožja merila za priglasitev organov, ki izvajajo naloge tretje stranke v procesu ocenjevanja in preverjanja nespremenljivosti zmogljivosti.
The proposal, following the NLF in this, tightens the notification criteria for notified bodies and introduces specific requirements for notifying authorities.
Predlog v skladu s sklepom o novem zakonodajnem okviru zaostruje merila za priglasitev za priglašene organe in uvaja posebne zahteve za priglasitvene organe.
The proposal, however, provides for a possibility of granting an exemption from this ban, if the substance has been evaluated by the relevant Scientific Committee and found acceptable for use in toys, while for CMR 1 and 2 no suitable alternative substances must be available at the same time.
Predlog pa predvideva možnost dodelitve izjeme od te prepovedi, če je snov ocenil ustrezni znanstveni odbor in ugotovil sprejemljivo uporabo v igračah, pri čemer za CMR 1 in 2 sočasno ne sme biti na voljo nobenih ustreznih alternativnih snovi.
The proposal, however, provides for criteria for this assessment, notably the use of scientific advice, that Member States have at their disposal and will not normally require an overhaul of the current authorisation system.
Vendar so v predlogu določena merila za to oceno, predvsem uporaba znanstvenega mnenja, ki je na voljo državam članicam, in sedanjega sistema izdajanja dovoljenj običajno ne bo treba spreminjati.
The proposal, in line with the FLEGT Action Plan, focuses only on the question of legality, and does not address sustainability.
V skladu z akcijskim načrtom FLEGT je predlog usmerjen samo v vprašanje zakonitosti, ne pa tudi trajnosti.
The proposal, presented as part of the third maritime safety package, aims to ensure that there is a minimum set of rules common to all Member States governing civil liability and insurance for shipowners and to define the basis for rules to make operators more accountable and guarantee compensation for damages.
Namen predloga, predstavljenega v okviru tretjega paketa ukrepov za varnost v pomorskem prometu, je zagotoviti, da obstaja določeno minimalno število pravil o civilni odgovornosti in zavarovanju lastnikov ladij, ki bi bila skupna vsem državam članicam, ter na tej podlagi opredeliti pravila, ki bi zagotovila večjo odgovornost operaterjev in plačevanje odškodnin.
The proposal, therefore, complies with the subsidiarity principle.
Predlog je zato skladen z načelom subsidiarnosti.
The proposal, therefore, foresees a relatively high concentration cap for PM2.5 that would apply everywhere in the EU and which would ensure protection against unduly high risks but would only impose burdens in the most polluted areas.
Predlog zato predvideva sorazmerno visoko zgornjo mejo koncentracije trdnih delcev PM2,5, ki bi veljala povsod v EU in zagotovila varstvo pred neupravičeno velikimi tveganji, vendar bi obremenila le najbolj onesnažena območja.
The proposal, when establishing provisions for medium combustion plants, aims at filling in an existing gap in legislation.
Cilj predloga je zapolnitev obstoječe zakonodajne vrzeli z oblikovanjem določb za srednje velike kurilne naprave.
The proposal, which has been adopted by the Council in December 2015, will help ensure more effective cooperation between tax authorities and help governments to better protect their tax bases.
Predlog, ki ga je Svet sprejel decembra 2015, bo pomagal zagotoviti učinkovitejše sodelovanje med davčnimi organi in vladam omogočil boljšo zaščito davčne osnove.
The proposal, which is still pending in Council, is one of the Commission’s REFIT initiatives and aims to provide companies with a single set of corporate tax rules for doing business across the internal market.
Predlog, ki je še vedno v obravnavi v Svetu, je ena od pobud Komisije v okviru programa ustreznosti in uspešnosti predpisov, njegov namen pa je družbam zagotoviti enoten sklop pravil o davku od dohodkov pravnih oseb za poslovanje na notranjem trgu.
The proposal, which is taken at the right level and does not go further than absolutely necessary at EU level to achieve the objectives, therefore complies with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.
Zato je predlog, ki zadeva ustrezno raven in ki ne presega okvira na ravni EU, ki je nujno potreben za dosego ciljev, v skladu z načeloma subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti.
The proposal, which is taken at the right level and does not go further than absolutely necessary to achieve the objectives at EU level, therefore complies with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.
Zato je predlog, ki je ustrezen in ki ne presega okvira na ravni EU, nujno potrebnega za dosego ciljev, v skladu z načeloma subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti.
The proposal, which takes into account the results of a study on conferral of executive powers4, combines the creation of teams of national experts, Rapid Border Intervention Teams that will act within the framework of the Agency with the introduction of common rules on the tasks which can be carried out by guest officers of border guards of other Member States operating for the purpose of joint operations or deployment as members of the teams under the aegis of the Agency.
Predlog, ki upošteva rezultate študije o podelitvi izvršilnih pooblastil4, združuje ustanovitev skupin nacionalnih strokovnjakov, skupin za hitro posredovanje na mejah, ki bodo delovale v okviru Agencije, z uvedbo skupnih pravil o nalogah, ki jih lahko izvajajo gostujoči pripadniki mejnih straž drugih držav članic, ki delujejo za namen skupnih operacij ali razporeditve kot člani skupin pod okriljem Agencije.
The proposal/initiative does not provide for co-financing by third parties
V predlogu/pobudi ni načrtovano sofinanciranje tretjih oseb
The proposal/initiative does not provide for co-financing by third parties
V predlogu/pobudi ni načrtovano sofinanciranje tretjih oseb.
The proposal/initiative does not provide for co-financing by third parties
V predlogu/pobudi ni načrtovano sofinanciranje tretjih strani.
The proposal/initiative does not provide for co-financing by third parties
V predlogu/pobudi ni načrtovano, da bi bile tretje osebe udeležene pri financiranju.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of additional human resources
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe človeških virov.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe odobrenih sredstev za upravne zadeve.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe odobritev upravne narave
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe odobritev upravne narave.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe odobritev za upravne zadeve
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe odobritev za upravne zadeve.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva rabe odobritev upravne narave
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva uporabe odobritev upravne narave.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva uporabe odobritev za poslovanje.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
Za predlog/pobudo niso potrebne odobritve za upravne zadeve.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe človeških virov
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe človeških virov.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva rabe človeških virov
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva uporabe odobritev za človeške vire.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva uporabe človeških virov
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva uporabe človeških virov.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
Za predlog/pobudo niso potrebni človeški viri.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources47
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe človeških virov47.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of new operational appropriations (the initiative is part of the current financial framework)
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe novih odobritev za poslovanje (pobuda je del sedanjega finančnega okvira).
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of new operational appropriations (the initiative is part of the current financial framework)
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe novih odobritev za poslovanje (pobuda je del veljavnega finančnega okvira).
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe odobrenih sredstev za poslovanje.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe odobritev za poslovanje
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva porabe odobritev za poslovanje.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations
Predlog/pobuda ne zahteva uporabe odobritev za poslovanje.
The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations
Za predlog/pobudo niso potrebne odobritve za poslovanje.
The proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:
Predlog/pobuda ima naslednje finančne posledice: