natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The European Court of Human Rights judgment in D.H. and others –v– Czech Republic illustrates how decisions on who should receive special needs education can maintain entrenched patterns of educational discrimination11.
in drugi proti Češki republiki je razvidno, kako lahko odločitve o tem, komu naj se omogoči izobraževanje za osebe s posebnimi potrebami, ohranjajo ustaljene vzorce diskriminacije v izobraževanju11.
The European Court of Human Rights judgment in D.H. and others –v– Czech Republic illustrates how decisions on who should receive special needs education can maintain entrenched patterns of educational discrimination12.
in drugi proti Češki republiki je razvidno, kako lahko odločitve o tem, komu naj se omogoči izobraževanje za osebe s posebnimi potrebami, ohranjajo ustaljene vzorce diskriminacije v izobraževanju12.
The European Court of Human Rights provides an additional layer of protection after all domestic remedies have been exhausted.
Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice zagotavlja dodatno varstvo, ko so bile izčrpana vsa pravna sredstva na nacionalni ravni.
The European Court of Human Rights19 has equally acknowledged that, in the area of trade union freedom, in view of the sensitive character of the social and political issues involved in achieving a proper balance between the respective interests of labour and management, and given the wide degree of divergence between national systems in this field, the Contracting States enjoy a wide margin of appreciation as to how the freedom of trade unions to protect the occupational interests of their members may be secured.
Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice19 priznava tudi, da imajo države pogodbenice na področju sindikalne svobode zaradi občutljive narave socialnih in političnih vprašanj pri zagotavljanju ustreznega ravnotežja med interesi socialnih partnerjev ter glede na velike razlike med nacionalnimi sistemi na tem področju široko polje proste presoje, kako se lahko zavaruje svoboda sindikatov za zaščito poklicnih interesov njihovih članov.
the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has delivered important rulings clarifying some of the EIA provisions;
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je izdalo pomembne sodbe, ki pojasnjujejo nekatere določbe o presoji vplivov na okolje,
The European Court of Justice (ECJ), called on to decide on various individual cases, has returned judgments which, in the absence of Community legislation on the matter, provide useful case law as a guide.
Sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti (SES), ki se je moralo opredeliti v več posamičnih primerih, so na tem področju, ki ni urejeno z zakonodajo Skupnosti, koristna pravna vodila.
The European Court of Justice also ruled that the provisions of Article 32(1) (now Article 29(1)) of the Visa Code, read in conjunction with Article 21(1) (now Article 18(1)), "must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation on the competent authorities of a Member State to issue a uniform visa is subject to the condition that there is no reasonable doubt that the applicant intends to leave the territory of the Member States before the expiry of the visa applied for, in the light of the general situation in the applicant's country of residence and his individual characteristics, determined in the light of information provided by the applicant."
Sodišče EU je tudi odločilo, da je treba določbe člena 32(1) (zdaj člena 29(1) Vizumskega zakonika) v povezavi s členom 21(1) (zdaj člena 18(1)) „razlagati tako, da je obveznost pristojnih organov države članice izdati enotni vizum pogojena s tem, da glede na splošni položaj v državi prebivališča prosilca in glede na njegove lastnosti, ugotovljene na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložil, ni upravičenega dvoma o namenu prosilca zapustiti ozemlje držav članic pred potekom zaprošenega vizuma“.
The European Court of Justice and national courts must be accessible and take all appropriate measures to fight discrimination.
Sodišče EU in nacionalna sodišča morajo biti dostopna in sprejeti vse ustrezne ukrepe za boj proti diskriminaciji.
The European Court of Justice and national courts must be accessible and take all appropriate measures to fight discrimination.
Sodišče in nacionalna sodišča morajo biti dostopna in sprejeti vse ustrezne ukrepe za boj proti diskriminaciji.
The European Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance have at several occasions held that there are three distinct categories of activities which are financed by the State: activities of public authority, economic activities, and non-economic activities.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti in Sodišče prve stopnje sta že večkrat odločili, da je treba razlikovati tri vrste dejavnosti, ki jih financira država: dejavnosti organa oblasti, gospodarske dejavnosti in negospodarske dejavnosti.
The European Court of Justice annulled the 2004 cotton reform on the grounds that the European Commission (EC) had failed to consider (a) direct labour costs in the evaluation and decision process and (b) the impact of the new regime on the ginning industry.
Evropsko sodišče je razveljavilo reformo sektorja bombaža iz leta 2004, ker Evropska komisija v postopku vrednotenja in odločanja ni upoštevala neposrednih stroškov dela in učinka novega režima na panogo odzrnjevanja bombaža.
The European Court of Justice annulled this Framework Decision in its judgment of 13 September 2005 (C-176/03) for infringing Article 47 EU, holding that on account of both their aim and content, Articles 1-7 of that Framework Decision have as their main purpose the protection of the environment and could have been properly adopted on the basis of Article 175 EC.
V svoji razsodbi z dne 13. septembra 2005 (C-176/03) je sodišče Evropskih skupnosti ta okvirni sklep razveljavilo zaradi kršitve člena 47 EU, saj je glavni namen členov od 1 do 7 Okvirnega sklepa tako zaradi njihovega namena kot zaradi njihove vsebine varstvo okolja in bi bili lahko zato veljavno sprejeti na podlagi člena 175 ES.
The European Court of Justice confirmed in its judgment12 on the European Cooperative Society that Article 352 was the correct legal basis.
Evropsko sodišče je v sodbi o evropski zadrugi12 potrdilo, da je člen 352 pravilna pravna podlaga.
The European Court of Justice eventually ruled accordingly3 and one Member State has now complied with the Court ruling.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je na koncu tudi tako odločilo3 in ena država članica sedaj ravna skladno z odločbo Sodišča.
The European Court of Justice had not yet examined the complaint lodged by the Latvian company Laval in respect of actions taken by the Swedish trade unions; it would therefore be premature to consider that social dialogue was providing a template for implementing the Lisbon strategy.
Glede na to, da Evropsko sodišče še ni obravnavalo pritožbe, ki jo je vložilo letonsko podjetje Laval glede ukrepov švedskih sindikatov, je prezgodaj soditi, da socialni dialog velja za vzorec izvajanja lizbonske strategije.
The European Court of Justice has already found certain national provisions on information on medicinal products to be contrary to Article 28 of the Treaty (case C-143/06, Juers-Pharma).
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je za nekatere nacionalne določbe o informacijah o zdravilih že ugotovilo, da so v nasprotju s členom 28 Pogodbe (zadeva C-143/06, Juers-Pharma).
The European Court of Justice has already found certain national provisions on information on medicinal products to be contrary to Article 28 of the Treaty (case C-143/06, Juers-Pharma).
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je že razsodilo, da so nekatere nacionalne določbe v zvezi z informacijami o zdravilih v nasprotju s členom 28 Pogodbe (zadeva C-143/06, Juers-Pharma).
The European Court of Justice has also emphasised that “the Treaty does not prohibit an undertaking from exercising the freedom to provide services if it does not offer services in the Member State in which it is established”12.
Evropsko sodišče je poudarilo tudi, da „Pogodba ne prepoveduje podjetju, da uveljavlja pravico do opravljanja storitev, če ne zagotavlja storitev v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež“12.
The European Court of Justice has also issued a number of judgments in this connection, some recently, excluding in any case the possibility of a mixed legal basis where references are contradictory or so layered as to limit Parliament's rights.
Tudi Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je v zvezi s tem objavilo številne sodbe, nekatere nedavno, ki v vsakem primeru izključujejo možnost mešane pravne podlage, če si reference nasprotujejo ali so kombinirane tako, da omejujejo pravice Evropskega parlamenta.
The European Court of Justice has always played an important role in contributing to diminish effectively discrimination of women in employment.
Evropsko sodišče je vedno učinkovito zmanjševalo diskriminacijo žensk pri zaposlitvi.
The European Court of Justice has clarified its position on this matter: essentially, the provisions aimed at combating tax evasion and the transfer of revenue to tax havens are in principle incompatible with the principle of free movement within the EU; such provisions could, however, be justified only where they are limited to combating commensurately the establishment of artificial and abusive structures.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je imelo priložnost podati svoje stališče v tej zadevi: v bistvu so določbe, katerih cilj je boj proti izogibanju plačevanja davkov in selitvi prihodkov na območja z ugodnejšimi davčnimi režimi, načeloma nezdružljive z načelom prostega pretoka znotraj EU; takšne določbe so lahko upravičene zgolj v primerih, če se omejujejo na sorazmeren boj proti vzpostavljanju umetnih struktur in zlorab.
The European Court of Justice has clarified its position on this matter: essentially, the provisions aimed at combating tax evasion and the transfer of revenue to tax havens are in principle incompatible with the principle of free movement within the EU; such provisions could, however, be justified only where they are limited to combating commensurately the establishment of artificial and abusive structures.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je imelo priložnost podati svoje stališče v tej zadevi: v bistvu so predpisi, katerih cilj je boj proti izogibanju plačevanja davkov in selitvi prihodkov na območja z ugodnejšimi davčnimi režimi, načeloma nezdružljivi z načelom prostega pretoka znotraj EU; takšni predpisi so lahko upravičeni zgolj v primerih, če se omejujejo na boj proti vzpostavljanju umetnih struktur in zlorab ob upoštevanju načela sorazmernosti.
The European Court of Justice has confirmed that if necessary, Member States are required to denounce agreements that are incompatible with the acquis.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je potrdilo, da lahko, če je to potrebno, države članice odpovejo sporazume, ki niso v skladu s pravnim redom Skupnosti.
The European Court of Justice has confirmed that where the tax administration is able to prove that the customer knew or should have known that his or her purchase was part of a transaction connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT, it can refuse the customer the right to deduct.
Sodišče Evropske unije je potrdilo, da lahko davčna uprava stranki zavrne pravico do odbitka, če lahko dokaže, da je stranka vedela ali bi morala vedeti, da je njen nakup del transakcije, povezane z utajo DDV.
The European Court of Justice has consistently held that this exception is to be interpreted restrictively and covers only posts involving direct or indirect participation in the exercise of powers conferred by public law and duties designed to safeguard the general interests of the State or of other public authorities40.
Sodišče EU se je dosledno držalo stališča, da je treba to izjemo razlagati restriktivno in da velja samo za delovna mesta, ki zajemajo neposredno ali posredno udeležbo pri izvajanju javnopravnih pooblastil in dolžnosti, namenjenih varovanju splošnih interesov države ali drugih javnih organov40.
The European Court of Justice has interpreted Community rules in a different way compared to interpretation by national governments.
Sodišče evropskih skupnosti v primerjavi z nacionalnimi vladami drugače razlaga pravila Skupnosti.
The European Court of Justice has jurisdiction over ERICs.
za ERIC je pristojno Sodišče EU.
The European Court of Justice has provided further guidance on how Member States can take these national measures in full compatibility with the Treaty, stressing that purely economic grounds can never justify obstacles prohibited by the Treaty4.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je zagotovilo dodatne smernice o tem, kako lahko države članice te nacionalne ukrepe sprejemajo v popolni skladnosti s Pogodbo, in poudarilo, da zgolj gospodarski razlogi v nobenem primeru ne upravičujejo ovir, ki jih prepoveduje Pogodba4.
The European Court of Justice has repeatedly confirmed that combating alcohol-related harm is an important and valid public health goal3.
Evropsko sodišče je večkrat potrdilo, da je boj proti škodi zaradi uživanja alkohola pomemben in utemeljen cilj javnega zdravja3.
The European Court of Justice has ruled on this issue27.
Sodišče je o zadevi že odločilo27.
The European Court of Justice has ruled that, in the absence of Community rules on the matter, it is up to the legal systems of the Member States to establish detailed rules for bringing damages actions.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je razsodilo, da morajo ob odsotnosti pravil Skupnosti o zadevi pravni sistemi držav članic zagotoviti podrobna pravila o vložitvi odškodninske tožbe.
The European Court of Justice has stated that neither the special nature of health services nor the way in which they are organised or financed removes them from the ambit of the fundamental principle of freedom of movement16.
Kot je potrdilo Sodišče, zdravstvene storitve niti zaradi svojih posebnosti niti zaradi načina organiziranosti ali financiranja niso izvzete iz obsega temeljnega načela prostega pretoka16.
The European Court of Justice has stated that, under EU law, any individual can claim compensation for harm suffered where there is a causal relationship between that harm and an agreement or practice prohibited under Article 81 EC10; however, the Commission has found that, in practice, victims of anti-trust infringements only rarely obtain compensation.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je izjavilo, da lahko v skladu s pravom EU vsak posameznik zahteva povrnitev škode, če med to škodo in sporazumom ali ravnanjem, ki ni v skladu s členom 8110 Pogodbe ES, obstaja vzročno razmerje, vendar je Komisija ugotovila, da žrtve protimonopolnih kršitev v praksi le redko prejmejo nadomestilo škode.
The European Court of Justice held that the aim of increasing the employability of older workers was legitimate, but the measure did not respect the principle of proportionality, as it was deemed to be too wide in scope and the aim could have been achieved in a less discriminatory way.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je razsodilo, da je sicer povečevanje zaposljivosti starejših delavcev legitimen cilj, vendar ukrep ne upošteva načela sorazmernosti, ker naj bi bilo njegovo področje uporabe preširoko, njegov cilj pa bi bilo mogoče doseči na manj diskriminatoren način.
The European Court of Justice in the Colorell judgement4 accepted that the use of actuarial statistics based on sex was valid for the purposes of calculation of pension contributions and benefits.
Evropsko sodišče je v sodbi Colorell2 priznalo, da je bila uporaba aktuarske statistike, ki temelji na spolu, veljavna za izračunavanje prispevkov in prejemkov iz naslova pokojnin.
The European Court of Justice in the Colorell judgement5 accepted that the use of actuarial statistics based on sex was valid for the purposes of calculation of pension contributions and benefits.
Evropsko sodišče je v sodbi Colorell5 priznalo, da je bila uporaba aktuarske statistike, ki temelji na spolu, veljavna za izračunavanje prispevkov in prejemkov iz naslova pokojnin.
The European Court of Justice raised, in particular, the question of the justification for the decoupling rate chosen.
Evropsko sodišče je zlasti opozorilo na vprašanje utemeljitve izbrane stopnje nevezanosti plačil.
The European Court of Justice ruling in the Easycar10 case, in which the Court ruled that car hire amounts to “transport” within the meaning of the Directive, indicates that the Directive does not cover some distance contracts which the Commission and at least certain Member States intended it to11.
Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi Easycar10, v kateri je Sodišče odločilo, da najem vozila pomeni „prevoz“ v smislu Direktive, navaja, da Direktiva ne zajema nekaterih pogodb pri prodaji na daljavo, ki so jih Komisija in vsaj nekatere države članice predvidele11.
The European Court of Justice stated that although the Member States are competent to determine the content of teaching and the organisation of their respective education systems, that competence must be exercised in compliance with Community law and, in particular, in compliance with freedom of movement for citizens of the Union, as conferred by article 18 EC.
Evropsko sodišče je odločilo, da morajo države članice, ki so sicer res pristojne za določanje izobraževalnih vsebin in organizacijo svojih izobraževalnih sistemov, to pristojnost uresničevati v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti in zlasti v skladu s pravico do svobode gibanja državljanov Skupnosti, ki jo zagotavlja člen 18 Pogodbe ES.
The European Court of Justice will provide a remedy for non-compliance, and this, together with the Commission's power to launch infringement proceedings against Member States, will create strong incentives for Member States to comply with their obligations under the Directive.
Sodišče Evropske unije bo zagotovilo pravno sredstvo za neupoštevanje, in to bo skupaj s pooblastilom Komisije, da zoper države članice uvede postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev, ustvarilo močne spodbude za države članice, da bodo ravnale v skladu z obveznostmi na podlagi direktive.
The European Court of Justice, in its 1990 ruling stated that the children of migrant workers, if they decide to study in a Member State different from their host country, are entitled to the same benefits they would enjoy in their host country29.
Evropsko sodišče je v sodbi leta 1990 odločilo, da imajo otroci delavcev migrantov, ki se odločijo za študij v državi članici, ki ni njihova država gostiteljica, pravico do enakih ugodnosti, kot bi jih uživali v državi gostiteljici29.
The European Court of Justice, in its judgment of 6 December 2005, declared invalid Article 1(1)(b) of Directive 2002/2/EC, which amended Council Directive 79/373/EEC, in the light of the principle of proportionality.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti s sodbo dne 6. decembra 2005 razveljavilo člen 1(1)(b) Direktive 2002/2/ES, ki je spremenila Direktivo Sveta 79/373/EGS.
The European Courts have taken a narrow view concerning the application of Article 81 EC to supply quota systems which limit or make impossible trade between Member States, on the ground that such systems constitute unilateral behaviour on the part of the undertakings.
Evropska sodišča ozko gledajo na uporabo člena 81 ES pri sistemih dobavnih kvot, ki omejujejo ali onemogočajo trgovanje med državami članicami, ker gre pri takšnih sistemih za enostransko ravnanje podjetij.
the European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET, adopted in 2009)
evropski sistem kreditnih točk v poklicnem izobraževanju in usposabljanju (ECVET, sprejet leta 2009),
The European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training is directed at citizens, and is intended to facilitate the recognition of their learning outcomes, in a borderless lifelong learning process.
Evropski sistem kreditnih točk za poklicno izobraževanje in usposabljanje je namenjen državljanom, da se omogoči priznavanje njihovih učnih rezultatov pri čezmejnem vseživljenjskem učenju.
The European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training is intended to facilitate the recognition of learning outcomes, in the framework of mobility, for the purpose of achieving a qualification.
Namen Evropskega sistema prenašanja kreditnih točk v poklicnem izobraževanju in usposabljanju je lažje priznavanje učnih rezultatov v okviru mobilnosti pri pridobitvi kvalifikacije.
the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS)10 developed in the context of the European Higher Education Area and the European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET) established through the Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 200911;
evropskim sistemom prenašanja in zbiranja kreditnih točk (ECTS)10, ki je bil razvit v okviru evropskega visokošolskega prostora, in evropskim sistemom kreditnih točk poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja (ECVET), ki je bil vzpostavljen v skladu s Priporočilom Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. junija 200911;
the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System ECTS (for higher education)
evropski sistem za nabiranje in prenos kreditnih točk ECTS (v visokem šolstvu),
The European Criminal Records Information System ECRIS allows exchanging information on convictions concerning third country nationals and stateless persons, but there is no procedure in place to do so efficiently.
Evropski informacijski sistem kazenskih evidenc (ECRIS) omogoča izmenjavo informacij o obsodbah državljanov tretjih držav in oseb brez državljanstva, vendar pa ni postopka, ki bi zagotavljal učinkovitost teh izmenjav.
The European cross-acceptance process should be permanently monitored by the Agency (ERA).
Agencija (ERA) mora ves čas spremljati evropski proces vzajemne odobritve.
The European cultural sector is already a very dynamic trigger of economic activities and jobs throughout the EU territory.
Evropski kulturni sektor je že silovit sprožilec gospodarskih dejavnosti in delovnih mest po vsej EU.
The European Customs Information Portal (ECIP) provides further practical information for prospective traders alongside e-learning tools and on-line databases21.
Evropski carinski informacijski portal poleg orodij za e-učenje in spletnih podatkovnih zbirk zagotavlja nadaljnje praktične informacije za podjetja, ki jih zanima zunanja trgovina21.
The European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) has been created within Europol to tackle cyber crime.
V okviru Europola je bil ustvarjen Evropski center za boj proti kibernetski kriminaliteti (EC3).
The European Cybercrime Centre (EC3)16 has been created within Europol to tackle cyber crime.
V okviru Europola je bil ustvarjen Evropski center za boj proti kibernetski kriminaliteti (EC3)16.
The European Cybercrime Centre should receive more resources, including financial ones, even though it has only recently been set up.
Evropski center za kibernetsko kriminaliteto mora kljub svojemu kratkemu obstoju prejeti več sredstev, tudi finančnih.
The European Data Infrastructure will contribute to the digitisation of industry, to develop European platforms for new, strategic applications (e.g. medical research, aerospace, energy) and to foster industrial innovation.
Evropska podatkovna infrastruktura bo prispevala k digitalizaciji industrije, razvoju evropskih platform za nove, strateške aplikacije (npr. medicinske raziskave, vesolje, energijo) in za spodbujanje industrijskih inovacij.
The European Data Infrastructure will gather the necessary resources and capabilities, to close the chain from research and development to the delivery and operation of the exascale HPC systems co-designed between users and suppliers.
Evropska podatkovna infrastruktura bo zbrala potrebne vire in zmogljivosti za izpopolnitev verige od raziskav in razvoja do dostave in delovanja sistemov visoko zmogljivega računalništva na ravni eksa, ki jih skupaj zasnujejo uporabniki in dobavitelji.
The European Data Infrastructure will include a governance structure for the management and the development of the data infrastructure and services,54 decision making on funding, long-term sustainability and security.
Evropska podatkovna infrastruktura bo vključevala strukturo upravljanja za upravljanje in razvoj podatkovne infrastrukture in storitev,54 odločanje o financiranju, dolgoročno trajnost in varnost.