natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The evaluation study shows that the extent which the SSA cover the needs of the PIME varies, both in terms of the products selected and the islands that are eligible.
Ocenjevalna študija je pokazala, da potrebe z vidika izbranih proizvodov in z vidika upravičenih otokov s posebnim režimom preskrbe niso zadovoljene enotno.
The evaluation study shows that the reform has improved the administrative efficiency (the increased budget has induced an effect of economy of scale).
Ocenjevalna študija kaže, da se je s prenovo izboljšala administrativna učinkovitost (povečanje proračuna je namreč ustvarilo učinke ekonomije obsega).
The evaluation study shows that the SSA are considered to be essential for supply in all the islands, both by the national and local authorities and by the operators, which is why it is important to maintain these arrangements.
Ocenjevalna študija je pokazala, da je po mnenju nacionalnih in regionalnih organov ter tudi nosilcev dejavnosti na vseh otokih posebni režim preskrbe bistvenega pomena za preskrbo, kar kaže na pomembnost ohranitve tega instrumenta.
The evaluation study was also transmitted to European Parliament and Council; the European Parliament issued a Resolution containing its opinion on it53.
Ocenjevalna študija je bila poslana tudi Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu; Evropski parlament je sprejel resolucijo, ki vsebuje mnenje o njej53.
The evaluation study was carried out by"The Evaluation Partnership", assisted in the process by a Steering Group composed of relevant Commission staff and representatives of 5 participating countries.
Ocenjevalno študijo je opravilo podjetje „The Evaluation Partnership“, ki mu je pri postopku pomagala usmerjevalna skupina, v kateri so bili ustrezno osebje Komisije in predstavniki petih sodelujočih držav.
The evaluation study, concluded in December 20143, contains an extensive analysis on the Directive's implementation as well as an analysis of the performance of the legislation according to five key evaluation criteria.
Končana je bila decembra 20143, vsebuje pa obsežno analizo izvajanja Direktive in analizo uspešnosti zakonodaje v skladu s petimi ključnimi merili vrednotenja.
The evaluation study3 was carried out by Ramboll Management Consulting AS, assisted in the process by the steering group composed of the relevant Commission staff and representatives of four participating countries.
Ocenjevalno študijo3 je opravilo podjetje Ramboll Management Consulting AS, ki mu je pri postopku pomagala usmerjevalna skupina, v kateri so bili ustrezno osebje Komisije in predstavniki štirih sodelujočih držav.
The evaluation suggested managing and limiting the number of proposals to be assessed by considering indirect competition, closed competition and informal competition.
V oceni je bilo predloženo, da je treba ob upoštevanju posredne, zaprte in neformalne konkurence omejiti število predlogov, ki se ocenijo.
The evaluation suggested more central application could be developed (recommendation 5).
V oceni je naveden predlog, da bi se lahko razvilo več centralnih aplikacij (priporočilo 5).
The Evaluation suggested that in order to stop such infringements a strongly coordinated approach or a single action at EU-level is necessary.
V oceni je navedeno, da je potreben dobro usklajen pristop ali enotno delovanje na ravni EU, da se take kršitve odpravijo.
The evaluation suggested that the benefits produced by the co-funded projects should be disseminated through tailored messages to interest groups.
V oceni je bilo predloženo, da je treba koristi iz sofinanciranih projektov razširiti z ustreznimi sporočili interesnim skupinam.
The evaluation suggests that more efforts and resources be allocated to the dissemination of best practises, for example via searchable web based databases.
Ocenjevalci tudi predlagajo, da si je treba za razširjenje najboljših praks, npr. za spletne podatkovne zbirke, bolj prizadevati in da jim je treba nameniti več sredstev.
The evaluation suggests that the Programme is able to achieve longer-term sustainability by developing the capacity of civil society and by encouraging participants to become future actors and multipliers.
Ocena kaže, da lahko program z razvijanjem sposobnosti civilne družbe in spodbujanjem udeležencev, da v prihodnosti postanejo akterji in pospeševalci javnega mnenja doseže dolgoročno trajnost.
The evaluation suggests that there is a balanced representation of women and men in the programme activities, however, minority groups, people with disabilities and marginalised groups in general are under-represented.
Ocena kaže, da so ženske in moški uravnoteženo zastopani v dejavnostih programa, v nasprotju z manjšinami, invalidi in marginaliziranimi skupinami, ki so nezadostno zastopani.
The evaluation supported the idea laid down in the proposal.
Vrednotenje je podprlo zamisel iz predloga.
The evaluation system refers to the performance of court systems, using indicators and targets.
Sistem ocenjevanja se nanaša na uspešnost sodnih sistemov, pri čemer se uporabljajo kazalniki in cilji.
The evaluation systems used in all of the Commission's activities are currently under review.
Trenutno poteka pregled vseh sistemov ocenjevanja, ki se uporabljajo v okviru dejavnosti Komisije.
The evaluation takes into account the inherent limitations of the findings of surveys: the answers received reflect the views of a sample of relevant stakeholders and not those of the entire population who has a stake in this domain.
v oceni so upoštevane neizogibne omejitve ugotovitev raziskav: prejeti odgovori izražajo stališča vzorca zadevnih deležnikov in ne celotne populacije, ki je zainteresirana za to področje.
The evaluation therefore allowed for such diversity when considering the effectiveness of the ECOC in promoting a European dimension.
Zato se je to različno razumevanje upoštevalo pri vrednotenju učinkovitosti EPK pri spodbujanju evropske razsežnosti.
The evaluation therefore concludes that the programme has been effective in promoting cross-border cultural cooperation, supporting artistic and literary creation and improving the circulation of cultural expressions.
V oceni je zato sklenjeno, da program uspešno spodbuja čezmejno kulturno sodelovanje, podpira umetniško in literarno ustvarjanje in izboljšuje kroženje kulturnega izražanja.
The evaluation therefore focused essentially on matters of efficiency, effectiveness and relevance.
Zato se je ocena osredotočila predvsem na vprašanja učinkovitosti, uspešnosti in ustreznosti.
The evaluation therefore focused on a proxy measure, namely, the adoption of horizontal actions and measures (HAMs), noting that this provided a mixed result since few of the HAMs saw widespread adoption in the projects of common interest (PCIs), let alone the rest of the EU.
Ocena se je zato osredotočila na nadomestni ukrep, namreč na sprejetje horizontalnih dejavnosti in ukrepov (HDU) in ugotovila, da je zaradi tega prišlo do mešanega rezultata, saj je bilo le nekaj HDU širše sprejetih pri projektih skupnega interesa (PSI), kaj šele v ostalih delih EU.
The evaluation thus provides evidence of the impact of the programme in line with the programme's objectives.
Ocenjevanje tako zagotavlja dokaze o vplivu programa v skladu z njegovimi cilji.
The evaluation thus provides evidence of the positive impact of the programme in line with the programme's objectives.
Ocena tako zagotavlja dokaze o pozitivnem vplivu programa v skladu z njegovimi cilji.
The evaluation training programmes for different levels and target groups have been implemented in 14 Member States.
Vrednotenje programov usposabljanja za različne stopnje in ciljne skupine izvaja 14 državah članicah.
The evaluation underlined that the vast majority of other existing mobility programmes focus predominantly on higher education and much less on secondary education, VET or especially adult education.
V oceni je poudarjeno, da se velika večina drugih obstoječih programov mobilnosti osredotoča predvsem na visokošolsko izobraževanje, precej manj pa na srednješolsko izobraževanje, poklicno izobraževanje in usposabljanje ter zlasti izobraževanje odraslih.
The evaluation underlined the benefits of children's participation and the need both for children to be aware of possibilities offered by digital technologies and for parents to be sufficiently engaged in their children’s online activities.
V oceni so bile poudarjene koristi sodelovanja otrok in potreba, da otroci poznajo možnosti, ki jih ponujajo digitalne tehnologije, ter da so starši dovolj vključeni v spletne dejavnosti svojih otrok.
The Evaluation underlines that consumer associations acting in the collective consumer interest play an important role in consumer rights' enforcement61 (they have a role under the Injunctions Directive62).
V oceni je poudarjeno, da imajo združenja potrošnikov, ki delujejo v skupnem interesu potrošnikov, pomembno vlogo pri uveljavljanju pravic potrošnikov61 (vlogo imajo na podlagi direktive o opustitvenih tožbah62).
The evaluation used the Commission’s standard evaluation criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, coherence, relevance and EU added value.
V oceni so bila uporabljena standardna ocenjevalna merila Komisije: uspešnost, učinkovitost, usklajenost, ustreznost in dodana vrednost EU.
The evaluation was able to draw on a number of complementary assessments including the interim evaluation of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) subtheme.2
Pri oceni si je bilo mogoče pomagati s številnimi dodatnimi ocenami, vključno z vmesno oceno podteme informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije (IKT)2.
The evaluation was based on several data collection methods, namely desk research, a survey of project leaders, interviews with a variety of stakeholders, analysis of data archives and analysis of the projects database.
Ocena je temeljila na številnih metodah za zbiranje podatkov, tj. namiznem pregledovanju, anketah z vodji projektov, razgovorih z različnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, analizah podatkovnih arhivov in analizah zbirk podatkov o projektih.
The evaluation was begun in 2005 and the final report will be delivered in the summer of 2006.
Ocena se je začela izvajati v letu 2005, končno poročilo pa bo pripravljeno poleti 2006.
The evaluation was carried in the course of 2010 and based on 2007, 2008 and 2009 data7.
Ocena je bila izvedena leta 2010 in temelji na podatkih iz let 2007, 2008 in 20097.
The evaluation was carried out by an external contractor who adopted a mixed methodology including desk research, stakeholder interview and a targeted consultation.
Vrednotenje je opravil zunanji izvajalec, ki je uporabil mešano metodologijo, ki vključuje teoretično raziskavo, razgovore z deležniki in ciljno posvetovanje.
The evaluation was carried out by independent experts from a consultancy company, RAND Europe, selected through a tendering procedure.
Oceno so opravili neodvisni strokovnjaki svetovalnega podjetja RAND Europe, ki je bilo izbrano prek razpisnega postopka.
The evaluation was carried out during 2006 and was based on data3 from 2004 and 2005.
Ocenjevanje se je izvajalo v letu 2006, temeljilo pa je na podatkih3 iz let 2004 in 2005.
The evaluation was carried out during the period February to May 2006, in close collaboration with the Commission services concerned2.
Ocena je bila izvedena v obdobju od februarja do maja 2006 v tesnem sodelovanju z zadevnimi službami Komisije2.
The evaluation was carried out in the second half of 2010 and is based on data from 2007 to 20102 and provided a very detailed representation of the performance of the programme and extensive statistical data on its beneficiaries.
Ocena, ki je bila opravljena v drugi polovici leta 2010 in temelji na podatkih iz obdobja 2007–20102, je dala zelo podroben prikaz delovanja programa in izčrpne statistične podatke o upravičencih do finančnih sredstev.
The evaluation was conducted between October 2014 and July 2015, and it covered all the activities carried out by EASO across all Member States.
Ocena se je izvajala med oktobrom 2014 in julijem 2015, zajemala pa je vse dejavnosti, ki jih je urad EASO izvedel v vseh državah članicah.
The evaluation was conducted by a panel of three independent experts4 during the period May to July 2008, in close collaboration with the Commission services concerned5.
Ocenjevanje je v obdobju od maja do julija 2008 izvajal odbor treh neodvisnih strokovnjakov4 v tesnem sodelovanju z zadevnimi službami Komisije5.
The evaluation was conducted from February to May 2006, in close collaboration with the Commission services concerned4.
Ocenjevanje je potekalo od februarja do maja 2006 v tesnem sodelovanju z zadevnimi službami Komisije4.
The evaluation was designed to assess the rationale, implementation and achievements of FP6 and based on an array of evidence2.
Ocenjevanje je namenjeno presoji načel, izvedbe in dosežkov 6OP in je podprto s številnimi dokazi2.
The evaluation was finalised in December 2012 and published.
Ocena je bila dokončana decembra 2012 in objavljena.
The evaluation was performed by the Commission with the assistance of a team of independent experts from a consultancy company.
Oceno je izvedla Komisija s pomočjo skupine neodvisnih strokovnjakov družbe za svetovanje.
The evaluation was required to use the same model as in the 2007-11 evaluations to provide comparable data over time.
Zahtevano je bilo, da se vrednotenje uporabi enak model kot pri vrednotenjih za leta 2007–2011, za zagotovitev primerljivih podatkov skozi čas.
The evaluation was reviewed by STECF at their plenary meeting in Brussels later in March 2014.13
Oceno je pozneje v marcu 2014 pregledal STECF na plenarnem zasedanju v Bruslju13.
The evaluation was structured around five main evaluation questions: (1) the extent of the contribution of the pan-European electronic tax environment towards better functioning of the taxation systems in the internal market and the fights against fraud; (2) unexpected and/or unintended results and impacts and their role in the programme’s operations; (3) programme dissemination (awareness, knowledge and implementation), and; (4) value for money; (5) the EU added value.
Ocena je temeljila na petih glavnih ocenjevalnih vprašanjih, in sicer (1) obsegu prispevka vseevropskega elektronskega davčnega okolja k boljšemu delovanju sistemov obdavčitve na notranjem trgu in boju proti goljufijam, (2) nepričakovanih in/ali nenačrtovanih rezultatih ter učinkih in njihovi vlogi pri operacijah programa, (3) razširjanju programa (ozaveščenost, znanje in izvajanje), (4) cenovni primernosti ter (5) dodani vrednosti EU.
The evaluation was supported by an external study of the implementation of the Effort Sharing Decision.6
Vrednotenje je podprla zunanja študija o izvajanju odločbe o porazdelitvi prizadevanj.6
The evaluation will also be informed by quantitative data relating to a set of headline biodiversity indicators (Annex 2).
Ocena bo oblikovana tudi na podlagi kvantitativnih podatkov v zvezi z vrsto glavnih kazalcev biotske raznovrstnosti (Priloga 2).
The evaluation will also feed into recommendations as input for future Safer Internet policy and on the follow-up of the Programme through the digital services infrastructure for Safer Internet services implemented under the Connecting Europe Facility4.
Ocena bo uporabljena tudi v priporočilih za prihodnjo politiko za varnejši internet ter pri nadaljnjem spremljanju programa prek infrastrukture digitalnih storitev za varnejše internetne storitve, ki se izvajajo pri instrumentu za povezovanje Evrope4.
The evaluation will also identify further administrative/procedural simplification.
Pri vrednotenju bo tudi določena nadaljnja upravna/postopkovna poenostavitev.
The evaluation will also take into account new international developments.
Pri tem bo upoštevala tudi nov mednarodni razvoj na tem področju.
The evaluation will assess the impact of beef labelling rules for the meat supply chain, trade and consumers.
V okviru vrednotenja bo opravljena ocena učinka pravil o označevanju govedine na dobavno verigo mesa, trgovino z mesom in potrošnike.
The evaluation will assess to what extent the Platform has contributed to the achievement of the objectives of the Platform.
Ocenjeno bo, v kakšnem obsegu je platforma prispevala k doseganju svojih ciljev.
The evaluation will assess whether the Directive can be considered 'fit for purpose'
Z vrednotenjem bo preučeno, ali direktiva ustreza svojemu namenu.
The evaluation will be be based on the result indicators, such as the quality of the cooperation with other Member States, regular reporting and further research.
Ovrednotenje bo temeljilo na kazalnikih rezultatov, kot so kakovost sodelovanja z drugimi državami članicami, redno poročanje in nadaljnje raziskave.
The evaluation will be carried out according to the Commission’s guidelines.
Ocena bo izvedena v skladu s smernicami Komisije.
The evaluation will be repeated every three years.
Vrednotenje se bo ponovilo vsaka tri leta.
The evaluation will be shared with Parliament and Council once finalised.
Ocena bo po zaključku posredovana Parlamentu in Svetu.
The evaluation will be under the responsibility of the Commission and will take the form of an external evaluation every 6 years.
Ocenjevanje bo v pristojnosti Komisije in bo prevzelo obliko zunanjega ocenjevanja na vsakih šest let.
The evaluation will cover the scope, the essential health and safety requirements and their links with the related conformity assessment procedure.
Vrednotenje bo zajemalo področje uporabe ter bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve, tudi v povezavi z ustrezno oceno skladnosti.
The evaluation will examine the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and added value in terms of public information of the proposal, including any significant impacts on undertakings or in third countries.
V oceni bo presojala uspešnost, učinkovitost, ustreznost, skladnost in dodano vrednost predloga v smislu javnih informacij ter proučila morebitne znatne učinke na podjetja ali v tretjih državah.
The evaluation will gather market-based evidence on the functioning of current procurement legislation with a view to providing empirical insights into the areas that need improvement.
Za to oceno bodo zbrani na trgu temelječi dokazi o delovanju veljavne zakonodaje na področju javnih naročil, da bi se zagotovil empiričen vpogled v področja, ki jih je treba izboljšati.
The evaluation will in particular test whether the measures are still effective and efficient against the objectives developed above.
V okviru vrednotenja se bo zlasti preskušalo, ali ukrepi še vedno učinkovito in uspešno izpolnjujejo zgoraj navedene cilje.
The evaluation will include an assessment of whether the key objectives have been met, and also possibly allow for further lessons to be learnt.
Vrednotenje bo vključevalo oceno, ali so bili ključni cilji izpolnjeni, in morda omogočalo dodatna spoznanja.
The evaluation will include the ex post evaluation of the previous programmes.
Ocenjevanje vključuje naknadno oceno prejšnjih programov.
The evaluation will include the progress made with respect to political cooperation, the financial component as well as practical cooperation.
V vrednotenje bo vključen napredek, dosežen na področjih političnega sodelovanja, finančnega vidika in sodelovanja v praksi.
The evaluation will pay particular attention to detecting and assessing regulatory burden and identifying opportunities for simplification.
Pri vrednotenju bo posebna pozornost namenjena odkrivanju in ocenjevanju regulativnih obremenitev ter opredelitvi možnosti za poenostavitev.
The evaluation will pay particular attention to identifying possible simplifications and/or reductions in administrative burden, particularly for micro and small enterprises, while preserving a high level of protection for workers’ health and safety.
V oceni bo posebna pozornost namenjena opredelitvi morebitnih poenostavitev in/ali zmanjšanj upravnega bremena, zlasti za mikro in mala podjetja, pri čemer bi se ohranila visoka stopnja varovanja zdravja in varnosti delavcev.
The evaluation will take into account progress made with regard to the objectives of the Galileo and EGNOS programmes laid down in Article 1(4) and (5) on the basis of the following performance indicators:
Ocena upošteva dosežen napredek glede ciljev programov Galileo in EGNOS iz člena 1(4) in (5) na podlagi naslednjih kazalnikov uspešnosti:
The evaluation will take into account the views of stakeholders, at both Community and national levels.
Pri oceni se upošteva mnenje zainteresiranih strani na ravni Skupnosti in nacionalni ravni.
The evaluation will, based on the regular reporting plus further research, assess to what extent the Platform has contributed to the achievement of the specific objectives and whether there has been progress towards the general objective.
Pri vrednotenju bo na podlagi rednih poročil in dodatnih raziskav preučeno, v kolikšni meri je platforma prispevala k doseganju posebnih ciljev in ali je bil dosežen napredek pri uresničevanju splošnega cilja.
The evaluation will, in particular, address the possible need to modify the mandate of BEREC, and the financial implications of any such modification.
Ocenjevanje bo obravnavalo predvsem morebitno potrebo po spremembi pooblastil BEREC in finančne posledice takšnih sprememb.
The evaluation work
Vrednotenje
The evaluation work has been divided into three overlapping phases; inception phase, the collection/analysis phase and the interim evaluation/final report phase.
Ocenjevanje je bilo razdeljeno na tri faze, ki so se med seboj prekrivale: uvodno fazo, fazo zbiranja podatkov in analiziranja ter fazo vmesnega/končnega poročanja.
The evaluation work shall be organised, as appropriate, under the responsibility of either Member States or the Commission.
Organiziranje vrednotenja poteka v okviru odgovornosti bodisi držav članic bodisi Komisije.
The evaluation would be accompanied, as appropriate, by a Commission proposal to amend the Regulation to define the conditions for such access.
Oceno bo po potrebi spremljal predlog Komisije za spremembo uredbe, da se opredelijo pogoji za tak dostop.
The evaluation would be based on the indicators in the table above and would seek to establish to what extent the instrument has fulfilled the objectives and whether there is a need for revision.
Ocenjevanje bi temeljilo na kazalnikih iz zgornje razpredelnice, cilj pa bi bil ugotoviti, v kolikšni meri je instrument izpolnil cilje ter ali obstaja potreba po reviziji.
The evaluation would be carried out by the EESC in partnership with the European Commission.
Oceno bi pripravil EESO v sodelovanju z Evropsko komisijo.
The evaluation would be under the responsibility of the Commission and would take the form of an external evaluation every 6 years.
Ocenjevanje bi bilo v pristojnosti Komisije, prevzelo pa bi obliko zunanjega ocenjevanja na vsakih šest let.
The evaluation would consist of:
Ocenjevanje bi obsegalo:
The evaluation would look at the effectiveness of the financial assistance provided under article 13 of the ERF III, and could also examine the possibility of introducing a modulation of the lump sum according to the vulnerability or needs of particular categories of resettled persons.
V oceni bo proučena učinkovitost finančne pomoči, zagotovljene na podlagi člena 13 Odločbe o ERF III, lahko pa tudi možnost uvedbe prilagoditve pavšalnega zneska glede na ranljivost ali potrebe posebnih kategorij ponovno naseljenih oseb.
The Evaluation, as well as the Commission's and Member States biennial reports, show that not all Member States use the CPC actively and frequently49.
Iz ocene ter dvoletnih poročil Komisije in držav članic je razvidno, da vse države članice sodelovanja na področju varstva potrošnikov ne uporabljajo dejavno in pogosto49.
The evaluation, carried out from May 2007 to May 2008, responds to the requirements of the Financial Regulation2, its Implementing Rules3, and the provisions for evaluation for the Seventh Framework Programme4.
Ocenjevanje, ki je potekalo od maja 2007 do maja 2008, izpolnjuje zahteve finančne uredbe2, njenih izvedbenih pravil3 in določb za oceno sedmega okvirnega programa4.