natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mr Smyth presented the report on the Budget Group meeting held on 5 July 2016 to the Bureau, focusing in detail on the questions raised during the Budget Group meeting regarding certain requests from sections and other bodies, and on the concerns of its members in respect of expenditure forecasts which could exceed the available budget.
Michael SMYTH je predsedstvu predstavil povzetek seje skupine za proračun z dne 5. julija 2016 in pri tem podrobno odgovoril na vprašanja, izpostavljena na seji skupine za proračun v zvezi z nekaterimi zahtevki strokovnih skupin in drugih organov, ter se odzval na zaskrbljenost članov skupine za proračun, da bi bili lahko načrtovani odhodki višji od razpoložljivih proračunskih sredstev.
Mr Smyth presented the report to the Bureau, which had been approved by the Communication Group in January 2016.
SMYTH je predsedstvu predstavil poročilo, ki ga je skupina za komuniciranje sprejela januarja 2016.
Mr Smyth presented to the Bureau the report of the meeting of the Budget Group held on 11 October 2016, drawing attention to the comments that had been made regarding certain section requests.
Michael SMYTH je predsedstvu predstavil povzetek seje skupine za proračun z dne 11. oktobra 2016 in pri tem opozoril na pripombe glede nekaterih zahtevkov strokovnih skupin.
Mr Smyth presented to the Bureau the report of the meeting of the Budget Group held on 9 February 2016, drawing attention to the three requests which the Budget Group had referred to the Bureau for decision.
Michael SMYTH je predsedstvu predstavil povzetek seje skupine za proračun z dne 9. februarja 2016, pri čemer se je osredotočil na tri zahtevke, ki jih je skupina za proračun predložila v odločitev predsedstvu.
Mr Smyth presented to the Bureau the report on the Budget Group meeting held on 3 November 2016, focusing in particular on the development of the project concerning the distribution of 2017 budget appropriations for item 1004 (point D.5 below) and explaining the criteria underlying the Budget Group’s decision.
Michael SMYTH je predsedstvu predstavil poročilo s seje skupine za proračun 3. novembra 2016 in pri tem zlasti omenil pripravo načrta za razporedite proračunskih sredstev za leto 2017 pod postavko 1004 (glej točko D.5), pri čemer je pojasnil, katera merila je skupina pri tem uporabila.
Mr Smyth presented two possible options to the Bureau for allocating the reserve created at the beginning of the year, one of which was to distribute the reserve in keeping with the priorities identified by the financial actors.
Michael SMYTH je predsedstvu predstavil dve možnosti za porabo rezerve, oblikovane na začetku leta, pri čemer je ena od teh možnosti razporeditev rezerve glede na opredeljene prednostne naloge finančnih akterjev.
Mr Smyth said that he was shocked by how the referendum had been conducted and the lies told by the proponents of Brexit, and that he was worried about the future of the United Kingdom and the European Union.
Michael SMYTH je izrazil svojo pretresenost zaradi načina izvedbe referenduma in laži zagovornikov izstopa Združenega kraljestva ter dejal, da ga skrbi prihodnost Združenega kraljestva in Evropske unije.
Mr Smyth then drew attention to requests number 4 and 7, about which the budget group had some reservations when submitting them to the Bureau for decision.
Michael SMYTH je nato opozoril na zahtevka št. 4 in 7, glede katerih je imela skupina za proračun nekaj pridržkov, ki jih je predložila predsedstvu v odločanje.
Mr Smyth, replacing Mr Lobo Xavier, who had sent his apologies for his absence, presented to the Bureau the report by the president of the Communication Group (EESC-2016-03145-03-00-NB-TRA — item_e.1).
Michael SMYTH, ki je nadomeščal opravičeno odsotnega Gonçala LOBA XAVIERJA, je predsedstvu predstavil poročilo predsednika skupine za komuniciranje (dokument EESC-2016-03145-03-00-NB-TRA – Pt_E.1).
Mr Smyth, replacing the president of the Communication Group, whose absence had been justified, presented the group’s report to the Bureau (document EESC-2016-05716-05-00-NB-TRA - Item E.1).
Michael SMYTH, ki je nadomeščal opravičeno odsotnega predsednika skupine za komuniciranje, je predsedstvu predstavil poročilo skupine (dokument EESC-2016-05716-05-00-NB-TRA – Pt_E.1).
Mr Soares
ga.
Mr Soares (PT - II)
SOARES (PT-II)
Mr Soares (PT-II)
Mário SOARES (PT – II. sk.)
Mr Soares (PT-III)
Mário SOARES (PT-III)
Mr Soares drew attention to the quality of the Committee's achievements in terms of concrete partnership initiatives with civil society, in connection with external relations and involvement in issues such as immigration.
SOARES je omenil kakovost dela Odbora pri konkretnih pobudah za partnerstva s civilno družbo v okviru zunanjih odnosov in njegovo angažiranost pri problemih, kot je na primer priseljevanje.
Mr Soares outlined his opinion on the Commission's Green Paper on the challenges and opportunities for EU education systems posed by migration and mobility within the EU.
SOARES je predstavil svoje mnenje o zeleni knjigi Komisije o izzivih in priložnostih, ki jih migracije in mobilnost znotraj EU prinašajo za politiko izobraževanja držav članic.
Mr Soares presented the opinion's key points, explaining the general context in which it had been drawn up and setting out its conclusions and recommendations.
SOARES je predstavil glavne točke mnenja, pojasnil splošni okvir njegove priprave ter predstavil sklepe in priporočila.
Mr Soares proposed the following compromise text:
Poročevalec je predlagal naslednje kompromisno besedilo:
Mr Soares suggested the following compromise for point 1.2
SOARES je predlagal naslednji kompromis k točki 1.2:
Mr Sora (RO-Cat.
Gheorghe SORA (RO-int.
Mr Sora (RO-Cat.2)
Gheorghe SORA (RO – 2. kat.)
Mr Sorin Cristian Stan (Gr.
Sorin Cristian STAN (II. sk.
Mr Sorin Ionita (RO-III)
Sorin IONITA (RO-III)
Mr Sorin Ioniță (RO-III)
Sorin IONIȚĂ (RO-III)
Mr Sorin-Cristian Stan
Sorin-Cristian STAN
Mr Spyridon Papaspyros (EL – II)
Spyridon PAPASPYROS (EL-II)
Mr Staffan Nilsson, President of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC)
Staffan NILSSON, predsednik Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora
Mr Stanislaw Różycki (PL-II)
Stanislaw RÓŻYCKI (PL-II)
Mr Stanislaw Różycki (PL-II)
Stanisław RÓŻYCKI (PL-II)
Mr Stanisław Różycki (PL - II)
Stanisław RÓŻYCKI (PL-II)
Mr Stantic (Rule 62 - Voles)
STANTIČ (VOLES, člen 62)
Mr Stantic (SI – I)
Sirkeinen (FI – I)
Mr Stantic (SI – I)
SIRKEINEN (FI-I)
Mr Stantic (SL-I) (Art.
Mr Stantic (SL – I) (čl.
Mr Stantic stated that he supported the positions already adopted by the Committee on the future of the Constitutional process and the need to preserve the substance of the current treaty.
STANTIČ je podprl stališča, ki jih je Odbor že sprejel v zvezi s prihodnostjo ustavnega procesa in v zvezi s potrebo po ohranitvi bistva sedanje pogodbe.
Mr Stantič (SI-I)
SIRKEINEN (FI – I)
Mr Stantič (SI-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Csuport)
Cveto STANTIČ (SL-I) (Antal CSUPORT, člen 62)
Mr Stantič (SI-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Csuport)
Cveto STANTIČ (SL-I) (Antal CSUPORT, člen 62)
Mr Stantič (SI–I)
Cveto STANTIČ (SI-I)
Mr Stantič (SI–I)
STANTIČ (SI-I)
Mr Stantič (SL-I)
Cveto STANTIČ (SI-I)
Mr Stantič (SL–I)
Cveto STANTIČ (SI-I)
Mr Stantič advocated accepting the exception proposed by Mr Pater by incorporating it in the rapporteur's proposed wording of Rule 3.
PATER, in njeno vključitev v besedilo člena 3, ki ga je predlagal poročevalec.
Mr Stantič again spoke to point out that the proposal from Group I sought to give the powers of appointment not to the group president, but to the EESC president after consulting the group president.
STANTIČ, ki je opozoril, da predlog I. skupine ne omenja dodelitve pooblastil za imenovanja predsedniku skupine, ampak predsedniku Odbora po posvetovanju s predsednikom skupine, in nato ga.
Mr Stantič agreed with the rapporteur's initial wording, bearing in mind the specific nature of this section's missions as well as the sense of responsibility of section presidents, who would naturally be selective about the activities they were liable to participate in.
STANTIČ je soglašal s prvotnim predlogom poročevalca, ob upoštevanju posebnosti nalog te strokovne skupine, pa tudi v smislu odgovornosti predsednikov strokovnih skupin, ki bodo seveda morali izbrati med dejavnostmi, pri katerih bodo sodelovali.
Mr Stantič also drew attention to a discrepancy between this proposal – which he read out in full – and the wording in document CESE 441/2010.
STANTIČ je člane opozoril tudi na razhajanja med tem predlogom – ki ga je prebral v celoti – ter besedilom, ki je povzeto v dokumentu CESE 441/2010. G.
Mr Stantič also pointed out that members were not generally au fait with the rules governing appointment of administrators, and asked for information on the status of seconded national experts.
STANTIČ je prav tako poudaril, da člani nasploh niso seznanjeni s pravili, ki določajo imenovanje članov uprave, in zahteval informacije o statusu nacionalnih strokovnjakov.
Mr Stantič believed that the last proposal was too detailed, and suggested returning to the proposal submitted by the rapporteur at the previous meeting; he wondered whether the expression "European territory of the Union" was relevant.
STANTIČ je dejal, da se mu zdi zadnji predlog pretirano podroben in predlagal, da bi se vrnili k predlogu, ki ga je poročevalec dal na zadnji seji, ob tem pa se je spraševal tudi o ustreznosti izraza "evropsko ozemlje Evropske unije".
Mr Stantič commented that the points listed in Part D, paragraph 3 concerned technical adjustments, stemming directly from the Lisbon Treaty, as well as a substantial reform to the Committee's structures.
STANTIČ je dejal, da se vprašanja, našteta v točki 3 dela D, nanašajo tako na tehnične prilagoditve, ki izhajajo neposredno iz Lizbonske pogodbe, kot tudi na temeljito reformo struktur Odbora.
Mr Stantič deeply regretted the return to the intergovernmental method of treaty revision, as well as the fact that the idea of drawing all the Treaties together into one, which was a feature of the Constitutional Treaty, had been abandoned.
STANTIČ je zelo obžaloval, da bo spet uvedena medvladna konferenca za pregled pogodb in da se opusti načelo enotnosti, ki mu je bila zavezana ustavna pogodba.
Mr Stantič queried the limits placed on members' Wi-Fi access during sessions at the European Parliament.
STANTIČ je povprašal o omejitvah dostopa do brezžične povezave Wifi za člane, kadar bodo seje potekale v Evropskem parlamentu.
Mr Stantič stated that the additions proposed by Group I did not constitute an alternative proposal to the secretariat's initial proposal (document F/CESE 4869/2009 rev.), but complemented it by rationalising the rules for recruiting the staff of the groups.
STANTIČ je opozoril, da predlagani dodatki I. skupine niso alternativa prvotnemu predlogu sekretariata (F/CESE 4869/2009 rev.), temveč ga dopolnjujejo tako, da racionalizirajo pravila o zaposlovanju osebja skupin.
Mr Stantič thought it regrettable that in the current situation the staff in the groups were in fact under the authority of two superiors.
STANTIČ, ki je obžaloval to, da je osebje skupin zdaj dejansko podvrženo avtoriteti dveh nadrejenih, ga.
Mr Stantič, for instance, felt it was not sufficiently restrictive.
STANTIČ menil, da ni dovolj omejevalen.
Mr Stantič, however, felt that this item should be decided on by the Committee's political bodies, such as the Bureau.
STANTIČ pa je nasprotno menil, da bi morali to vprašanje obravnavati na ravni političnih instanc Odbora, kot je predsedstvo.
Mr Stefan Back (Gr.
Stefan BACK (I. sk.
Mr Stefan C. Collignon, Professor of Economics at Sant'Anna school of advanced studies (Pisa) and President of the scientific committee of CER ("Centro Europa Ricerche") in Rome.
Stefan C. Collignon, profesor ekonomske politike na univerzi Sant’Anna v Pizi in predsednik znanstvenega odbora raziskovalnega centra Centro Europa Ricerche v Rimu;
Mr Stefan Clauwaert
Herr Stefan CLAUWAERT
Mr Stefan Clauwaert
Stefan CLAUWAERT
Mr Stefan Clauwaert  (for Group II)
Stefan CLAUWAERT (za II. skupino)
Mr Stefano Cofini (for Group I)
(za II. skupino)
Mr Stefano Palmieri (Gr.
Stefano PALMIERI (II. sk.
Mr Stefano Palmieri (IT-II)
Stefano PALMIERI (IT-II)
Mr Steinmüller (for the rapporteur - AT)
Steinmüller (za poročevalca - AT)
Mr Stelios Charitakis (for the rapporteur)
Stelios CHARITAKIS (za poročevalca)
Mr Stephane Buffetaut (EESC Group I, Employers, France), Vice-President of the EESC's Section for Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and Information Society, welcomed the direct interaction between citizens and stakeholders: "This project is an excellent example of the value added by lay-person expertise.
Stéphane Buffetaut (EESO, I. skupina - delodajalci, Francija), podpredsednik strokovne skupine EESO za promet, energijo, infrastrukturo in informacijsko družbo, je pozdravil neposredno sodelovanje državljanov in zainteresiranih akterjev: "Ta projekt je odličen primer dodane vrednosti znanja in izkušenj nestrokovnjakov.
Mr Stephane Buffetaut – section president (FR-I)
Stéphane BUFFETAUT – predsednik strokovne skupine (FR-I)
Mr Stephen Muchiri, Director-General of the East Africa Farmers' Federation (EAFF)
Stephen MUCHIRI, generalni direktor združenja kmetov Vzhodne Afrike (EAFF – East Africa Farmers' Federation)
Mr Stephen Muchiri, Director-General of the East Africa Farmers' Federation (EAFF)
Stephena MUCHIRIJA, generalnega direktorja združenja kmetov Vzhodne Afrike (EAFF – East Africa Farmers' Federation)
Mr Stephen Thomas (for the rapporteur)
Stephen THOMAS (za poročevalko)
Mr Stern (SK-Gr.
Juraj STERN (SK-III)
Mr Stern (SK-III) (Rule 62 – Mr Hoffelt)
Juraj STERN (SK-III)
Mr Stern and Mr Malek then confirmed their support for the proposal to rename the civil society prize, with Mr Malek noting that Mr Havel's family should be contacted without delay.
Nato sta spregovorila še Juraj STERN in Zdenĕk MÁLEK, ki sta potrdila svojo podporo preimenovanju nagrade za civilno družbo, pri čemer je slednji opozoril, da je treba čim prej navezati stike s Havlovo družino.
Mr Stern spoke briefly to clarify a few points regarding the Commission's analysis of the Hungarian media law, which the president had mentioned in his statement.
STERN je na kratko pojasnil, da Komisija preučuje madžarski zakon o medijih, ki ga je omenil predsednik.
Mr Stevo Muk, President of Managing Board, Centre for the Development of NGOs (CRNVO)
MUK, predsednik upravnega odbora, Center za razvoj nevladnih organizacij (CRNVO);
Mr Stoev (BG-GRI) (Rule 62(3) Mr Danev)
Georgi STOEV (BG-I) (Bojidar DANEV, člen 62(3))
Mr Stoev (BG-I) (Rule 62 – Angelova)
Georgi STOEV (BG-I) (Milena ANGELOVA, člen 62)
Mr Stoev (BG-I) (Rule 62 – Ms Angelova)
Georgi STOEV (BG-I) (Milena ANGELOVA, člen 62)
Mr Storie-Pugh was a former president of the Royal Association of Veterinary Surgery.
STORIE-PUGH je bil nekdanji predsednik Royal Association of veterinary surgery (Kraljevskega združenja veterinarjev).
Mr Strasser expressed his appreciation of Mr Lustenhouwer's excellent presidency and stressed that in the current situation the AFM should allocate resources carefully.
Lustenhouwerja in poudaril, da mora združenje v sedanji situaciji previdno razporejati sredstva.
Mr Strasser thought that the opinion lacked a global context and a reference to global competitors.
Strasser je dejal, da bi mnenje moralo zajeti svetovni kontekst in omeniti svetovne tekmece.
Mr Stratos Papadimitriou (for the rapporteur)
Stratos PAPADIMITRIOU (za poročevalca)
Mr Strautmanis (LT-I)
Gundars STRAUTMANIS (LT-I)
Mr Stuart Etherington (UK-III)
Stuart ETHERINGTON (UK-III)
Mr Student (Cat.
STUDENT (int.
Mr Student (Cat.2-DE)
Thomas STUDENT (DE – 2. kat.)
Mr Student (DE-Cat.
g. STUDENT (DE - int.
Mr Student (DE-Cat.
STUDENT (DE-kat.
Mr Student (DE–Cat.
Thomas STUDENT (DE-kat.
Mr Stulík presented the opinion, underlining the serious lack of respect for human rights in Belarus, particularly for the right of association.
STULÍK je predstavil mnenje in poudaril hudo pomanjkanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic v Belorusiji, zlasti pravice do združevanja.
Mr Stylianos Staïkos
Stylianos STAÏKOS
Mr Stéphane Buffetaut
g. BUFFETAUT
Mr Stéphane Buffetaut (FR – I)
Stéphane BUFFETAUT (FR-I)
Mr Stéphane Buffetaut (FR–I)
Stéphane BUFFETAUT (FR–I)
Mr Stéphane Buffetaut – section president (FR-I)
Stéphane BUFFETAUT – predsednik strokovne skupine (FR-I)
Mr Stöhr drew attention to the various options, taking into account in particular the potential effects of transferring staff to the European Parliament, and to the differences from the budget for the current year.
Frank STÖHR je opozoril na različne možnosti, zlasti ob upoštevanju morebitnih posledic prerazporeditve osebja v Evropski parlament, ter na razlike v primerjavi s proračunom za tekoče leto.
Mr Surján replied to the comments of the various speakers, pointing out that the forthcoming European elections would offer an important opportunity to develop interinstitutional cooperation.
G. SURJÁN je odgovoril na pripombe govornikov in opozoril, da bodo prihodnje evropske volitve odlična priložnost za razvoj medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja.
Mr Surján then mentioned the Committee's different consultation procedures, stressing in particular the right to draw up own-initiative opinions, which was common to the EP and the EESC, but which often did not lead to concrete measures or follow-up.
SURJÁN je nato omenil različne posvetovalne postopke Odbora, pri čemer je posebej izpostavil pravico do priprave mnenj na lastno pobudo, ki jo imata tako Parlament kot tudi EESO, vendar pogosto ne privede do konkretnih rezultatov ali nadaljnjih ukrepov.
Mr Svensson (SE-GRI) (Art.
Erik SVENSSON (SE – I)
Mr Svensson spoke in support of the proposals made by Mr Malosse.
Erik SVENSSON je podprl stališča Henrija MALOSSA.
Mr Svensson stressed the need for an in-depth impact assessment regarding the administrative changes included in the agreement.
SVENSSON se je zavzel za poglobljeno presojo vpliva upravnih sprememb iz sporazuma; g.
Mr Sylvain Lhermitte (for the rapporteur)
Sylvain LHERMITTE
Mr Sylvain Lhermitte (for the rapporteur)
Sylvain LHERMITTE (za poročevalca)
Mr SZEBENY (for Group I)
SZEBENY (za I. skupino)
Mr Szerement (Cat.
SZEREMENT (Kat.
Mr Sánchez Ansó complained that the CAP, the only really common EU policy, was being dismantled for the sake of WTO negotiations.
SÁNCHEZ ANSÓ se je pritožil, da Skupno kmetijsko politiko – edino resnično skupno politiko EU – razgrajujejo zaradi pogajanj s Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo.
Mr Sánchez Ansó's amendment to point 5.3.2: 19 for, 1 abstention, 28 against
Sánchez Ansó, amandma k točki 5.3.2: 19 za, 1 vzdržan glas, 28 proti
Mr Sánchez-Ansó had withdrawn his amendments.
Sánchez Ansó je amandmaje umaknila.
Mr Sándor Tóth
gospod Sándor TÓTH
Mr Sébastien Dupuch (for the rapporteur)
Sébastien DUPUCH (za poročevalko)
Mr Sławomir Nałęcz (for the rapporteur)
Sławomir NAŁĘCZ
Mr Tamás Antal Halm
Tamás Antal HALM
Mr Tamás Fleischer
Tamás FLEISCHER
Mr Tapio Kytölä
Seppo KALLIO
Mr Tarren, expert for the co-rapporteur
David TARREN (za soporočevalca)
Mr Teder
Reet TEDER
Mr Teder (EE-I)
Reet TEDER (EE-I)
Mr Teisseire believed that this would safeguard the prerogatives of the secretary-general with respect to monitoring compliance with the provisions of the Staff Regulations.
TEISSEIRA bo to pomagalo zaščititi posebne pravice generalnega sekretariata glede spremljanja upoštevanja določb kadrovskih predpisov.
Mr Teisseire explained that the secretariat's new proposal was a compromise between the secretariat's initial proposal and the proposal that Group I had defended at earlier meetings, and took account of the Staff Committee's concerns.
TEISSEIRE je pojasnil, da je novo besedilo kompromis med prvotnim predlogom sekretariata in predlogom, ki ga je I. skupina podprla na preteklih sejah, in da upošteva pomisleke odbora osebja.
Mr Termes Carreró belonged to the:
ERMES CARRERÓ je bil član
Mr Theodoros Spathopoulos (for the rapporteur)
Theodoros SPATHOPOULOS (za poročevalca)
Mr Thomas Kaiser (for the rapporteur)
Thomas KAISER (za poročevalca)
Mr Thomas Mc Donogh
Thomasa Mc DONOGHA
Mr Thomas McDonogh (IE-I)
Thomas McDONOGH (IE-I)
Mr Thomas Müller-Uri (for Group III) (AT)
Thomas Müller-Uri (za III. skupino) (AT)
Mr Thomas Palmgren (Gr.
Thomas PALMGREN (III. sk.
Mr Thomas Student (Cat.
Thomas STUDENT (DE-kat.
Mr Thysebaert, administrator, secretariat of the secretary-general
THYSEBAERT, administrator, sekretariat generalnega sekretarja
Mr THYSSEN
g.THYSSEN
Mr Thyssen
Marco THYSSEN
Mr Tibor Migács
Tibor MIGÁCS
Mr Timmermans highlighted the European Commission's desire to gain maximum benefit from the EESC's expertise through the REFIT platform.
G. TIMMERMANS je poudaril pripravljenost Evropske komisije, da bi v okviru platforme REFIT čim bolj izkoristili strokovno znanje EESO.
Mr Timmermans insisted that better legislation would not in any way lead to a weakening of social and environmental standards, underlining the importance of receiving feedback on the ground regarding European legislation and its application, in order to avoid over-regulation.
G. TIMMERMANS je poudaril, da boljša priprava zakonodaje nikakor ne vodi v zniževanje socialnih in okoljskih standardov ter opozoril na pomen sprejemanja odzivov s terena glede evropske zakonodaje in njenega izvajanja, da se prepreči čezmerno prenašanje zakonodaje.
Mr Timmermans's statement and a summary of the debate are set out in Appendix II.
Predstavitev Fransa TIMMERMANSA in poročilo o razpravi skupščine sta na voljo v Prilogi II.
Mr Timmo Summa, Director, Enlargement Policy and Communication, Directorate General for Enlargement, European Commission.
Timmo Summa, direktor, politika širitve in komuniciranje, generalni direktorat za širitev, Evropska komisija.
Mr Timo Laukkanen (for the rapporteur)
Timo LAUKKANEN
Mr Tiziano Vecchiato (for Group III)
Tiziano Vecchiato (za III. skupino)
Mr Tom Gillen (for Group II)
(II. skupino)
Mr Tom Jenkins (UK) 1996 – 1998
Tom Jenkins (UK), 1996–1998
Mr Tom Jones (UK-III)
Tom JONES (UK-III)
Mr Tomasz Jasinski (PL-II)
Tomasz JASINSKI (PL-II)
Mr Tomasz Jasinski (PL-II)
Tomasz JASINSKI (PL-II)
Mr Tomasz Maria Kulisiewicz (for the rapporteur)
Tomasz Maria KULISIEWICZ (za poročevalko)
Mr Tomáš Miklošovič (for the rapporteur)
Tomáš MIKLOŠOVIČ
Mr Tomáš Strážay (for Group III)
(za III. skupino)
Mr Tomáš Strážay (for Group III)
Tomáš STRÁŽAY (za III. skupino)
Mr Tomáš Strážay (for the rapporteur)
(za poročevalca)
Mr Tomáš Strážay (for the rapporteur)
Tomáš STRÁŽAY
Mr Tomáš Strážay (for the rapporteur)
Tomáš STRÁŽAY (za poročevalca)
Mr Toni Vidan (CR-III)
Toni VIDAN (CR-III)
Mr Tony Vandeputte
Maria Sabina ANDREUZZI
Mr Toomas Mihkelson
Toomas MIHKELSON
Mr Topolanszki (HU-III) (Rule 62 - Mr Jahier)
Ákos TOPOLÁNSZKY (HU-III) (Luca JAHIER, člen 62)
Mr Topolanszky (III-HU)
Samostojni poročevalec: Ákos TOPOLÁNSZKY (III-HU)
Mr Topolánszky (HU-Gr.
TOPOLÁNSZKY (HU-III)
Mr Topolánszky (HU-III) (Rule 62 - Metzler)
Ákos TOPOLÁNSZKY (HU-III) (Arno METZLER, člen 62)
Mr Topolánszky (HU-III) -
Ákos TOPOLÁNSZKY (HU-III)
Mr Topolánszky questioned the reason for an unexpected tightening of security measures during a recent conference on migration; Mr Burns asked about the existence of an emergency plan, mentioned in the memo submitted to the Bureau without further explanation.
Ákos TOPOLÁNSZKY je vprašal, kaj je razlog za nepričakovano zaostritev varnostnih ukrepov med nedavno konferenco o migracijah, Brendan BURNS pa, ali obstaja načrt za ravnanje v izrednih razmerah, ki je bil brez kakršnega koli dodatnega pojasnila omenjen v obvestilu predsedstva.
Mr Tornberg
TORNBERG
Mr Tornberg (PL-I)
Mr Tornberg (PL – I)
Mr Trantina (CZ–III)
Pavel TRANTINA (CZ-III)
Mr Trantina also expressed his dissatisfaction with the proposed choice unplanned increase in the groups' budget, compared to the decrease in the sections' budget (on which point Mr Krawczyk repeatedly verbally attacked him), although he said that at the end of the day he did not intend to impede the consensus reached between the groups.
Tudi Pavel TRANTINA je izrazil nezadovoljstvo nad nepredvidenim povečanjem proračuna političnih skupin, medtem ko se je proračun strokovnih skupin zmanjšal (glede česar ga je Jacek Krawczyk večkrat verbalno napadel), vendar da v končnem primeru ne bo oviral soglasja, ki so ga dosegle strokovne skupine.