natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
QUESTION 5: What is the most important cooperation issue to be implemented?
VPRAŠANJE 5: Kateri je najpomembnejši element sodelovanja, ki ga je treba izvesti?
Question 6 : What measures should be developed to achieve the aims set and thus optimise the European Union’s intervention in the external market?
Vprašanje 6: Katere ukrepe je treba razviti za dosego ciljev in tako optimizirati posredovanje Evropske unije na zunanjem trgu?
Question 6 What kind of civil status certificates could be the subject of a European civil status certificate?
Vprašanje 6 Za katere listine o osebnem stanju bi se lahko uporabilo evropsko potrdilo o osebnem stanju?
Question 6) Should the rules on State aid for innovation include regional bonuses for cohesion purposes?
Vprašanje 6) Ali bi morala pravila o državni pomoči za inovacije vključevati dodatna sredstva za regije za kohezijske namene?
Question 6:
6. vprašanje:
Question 6:
Vprašanje 6:
Question 6:
Vprašanje 6:
QUESTION 6: do you believe that more effort should be devoted to the establishment of standards for satellite navigation devices and services, and at which level?
VPRAŠANJE 6: Ali menite, da bi si bilo treba bolj prizadevati za vzpostavitev standardov za naprave in storitve satelitske navigacije, in to na kateri ravni?
Question 6: How can school communities help to prepare young people to be responsible citizens, in line with fundamental values such as peace and tolerance of diversity?
Vprašanje 6: Kako lahko šolske skupnosti mlade pripravijo na odgovorno državljanstvo skladno z osnovnimi vrednotami, kot sta mir in strpnost do različnosti?
Question 6: If the possibility of choosing the law applicable to the succession is allowed, should the possibilities be limited, and should the procedure for making the choice be determined?
Vprašanje 6: Če priznamo izbiro dednega prava, ali je treba omejiti možnosti izbire in določiti podrobna pravila za izbiro?
Question 6: In order to strengthen the use of compost/digestate:
Vprašanje 6: Za namen povečanja uporabe komposta/pregnitega blata:
Question 6: Should the court have discretion when granting an attachment Order to require the creditor to provide a security deposit or a bank guarantee?
Vprašanje 6: Ali mora imeti sodišče pri odobritvi naloga za zaplembo diskrecijo, da od upnika zahteva zagotovitev varščine ali bančne garancije?
Question 6: Should the exchange of information between enforcement authorities be improved ?
Vprašanje 6: Ali bi bilo treba izboljšati izmenjavo informacij med izvršilnimi organi?
Question 6: Should the parties be allowed to choose applicable law?
Vprašanje 6: Ali bi bilo treba strankam dovoliti, da izberejo pravo, ki se uporablja?
Question 6: UTPs are routinely used in the food sector, especially by supermarkets, in day-to-day commercial dealings.
6. vprašanje: v živilskem sektorju nepoštene trgovinske prakse redno izvajajo zlasti supermarketi v vsakodnevnih poslovnih dejavnostih.
Question 6: UTPs are routinely used in the food sector, especially by supermarkets, in day-to-day commercial dealings.
6. vprašanje: v živilskem sektorju se nepoštene trgovinske prakse uporabljajo redno zlasti s strani supermarketov v vsakodnevnih poslovnih dejavnostih.
Question 6: What is your opinion on a possible reinforcement of the political dialogue between the EU, an OCT and the Member State to which it is linked, in particular in situations where the interests of the EU and the OCT concerned would differ?
Vprašanje 6: Kaj menite o možni okrepitvi političnega dialoga med EU, določenim ČDO in državo članico, s katero je povezan, zlasti v okoliščinah, ko se interesi EU in zadevnega ČDO razlikujejo?
Question 6: Would you support an obligation for Member States to ensure that information on the competent authorities and the required documents for the recognition of professional qualifications is available through a central on line access point in each Member State?
Vprašanje 6: Ali se strinjate, da bi vsaka država članica morala zagotoviti osrednjo elektronsko kontaktno točko, ki bi dala na voljo informacije o pristojnih organih in dokumentih, zahtevanih za priznanje poklicnih kvalifikacij?
Question 7 Do you think that civil status issues for citizens in cross-border situations in the EU could be effectively solved by national authorities alone?
Vprašanje 7: Ali menite, da bi lahko vprašanja o osebnih stanjih za državljane v čezmejnih primerih učinkovito reševali samo nacionalni organi?
Question 7) Are some types of aid more suited to specific situations and specific innovation activities (ex: tax rebates, secured loans, repayable advances)?
Vprašanje 7) Ali nekatere vrste pomoči bolje ustrezajo posameznim razmeram in posameznim inovativnim dejavnostim (npr. znižanje davka, zavarovana posojila, vračljivi predujmi)?
Question 7.1: What are in your view the benefits of greater regional economic integration that could present an advantage for certain OCTs in response to globalisation and the erosion of their trade preferences vis-à-vis the Community?
Vprašanje 7.1: Katere so po vašem mnenju koristi večjega regionalnega gospodarskega vključevanja, ki bi lahko prineslo prednost nekaterim ČDO kot odgovor na globalizacijo in upadanje trgovinskih preferencialov glede na Skupnost?
Question 7.2: How could the OCTs engage in wider regional trade and how could the Community facilitate this?
Vprašanje 7.2: Kako se lahko ČDO vključijo v širšo regionalno trgovino in kako lahko Skupnost to spodbudi?
Question 7:
7. vprašanje:
Question 7:
Vprašanje 7:
Question 7:
Vprašanje 7:
Question 7: At what time should these connecting factors be operative?
Vprašanje 7: V katerem trenutku morajo biti te zveze prisotne?
Question 7: Do you agree that the requirement of two years' professional experience in the case of a professional coming from a non-regulating Member State should be lifted in case of consumers crossing borders and not choosing a local professional in the host Member State?
Vprašanje 7: Menite, da za strokovnjake iz držav, v katerih njihov poklic ni reguliran, zahteva po dveh letih poklicnih izkušenj ne bi smela veljati v primeru, ko potrošniki prečkajo mejo in ne izberejo lokalnega strokovnjaka v državi članici gostiteljici?
Question 7: Do you consider that a European Assets Declaration should be introduced ?
Vprašanje 7: Ali menite, da bi bilo treba uvesti evropsko izjavo o premoženju?
Question 7: How can school staff be trained and supported to meet the challenges they face?
Vprašanje 7: Kako bi lahko usposabljali in podpirali šolsko osebje, da bi se lahko soočilo z izzivi?
Question 7: Should the choice be limited to certain laws?
Vprašanje 7: Ali bi bilo treba izbiro omejiti na nekatere pravne rede?
Question 7: Should the debtor be heard or notified prior to the granting of a bank attachment?
Vprašanje 7: Ali je treba dolžnika zaslišati ali obvestiti pred odobritvijo bančne zaplembe?
Question 7: Suppliers of commodities other than foodstuffs are evidently victims of UTPs by retail chains to a far lesser degree.
7. vprašanje: dobavitelji neživilskega blaga so očitno v veliko manjši meri žrtve nepoštenih trgovinskih praks maloprodajnih verig.
QUESTION 7: which safety applications do you believe require certification?
VPRAŠANJE 7: Za katere varnostne aplikacije je po vašem mnenju potrebno certificiranje?
Question 7: Who should benefit?
Vprašanje 7: Kateri naj bodo upravičenci?
Question 8 : In order to develop more effective and more ambitious strategies for accessing local, European and global markets, are there any conceivable synergies between the various promotion and information tools available to the EU?
Vprašanje 8: Ali so za razvoj učinkovitejših in ambicioznejših strategij za dostop do lokalnih, evropskih in svetovnih trgov mogoče sinergije med različnimi orodji promocije in informiranja, ki so na voljo v EU?
Question 8 What do you think of automatic recognition?
Vprašanje 8 Kaj menite glede priznavanja listin po uradni dolžnosti?
Question 8) Do you agree with the proposed criteria to define innovative start-ups, with the approach of not defining eligible costs, with the amounts of aid and cumulation rules?
Vprašanje 8) Ali se strinjate s predlaganimi merili za opredelitev inovativnih novoustanovljenih podjetij z uporabo pristopa neopredeljevanja upravičenih stroškov, z zneski pomoči in pravili o združljivosti?
Question 8.1: What is your view on the added value for OCTs of OCT-ACP cumulation of origin?
Vprašanje 8.1: Kaj menite glede dodane vrednosti zbiranja porekla ČDO-AKP za ČDO?
Question 8.2: By which OCTs and how often is OCT-ACP cumulation used?
Vprašanje 8.2: Kateri ČDO se poslužuje zbiranja porekla ČDO-AKP in kako pogosto je uporabljeno?
Question 8.3: How can the modernisation of the rules of origin be adjusted to the specific situation of the different OCTs?
Vprašanje 8.3: Kako se lahko posodobitev pravil o poreklu prilagodi posebnemu položaju različnih ČDO?
Question 8:
8. vprašanje:
Question 8:
Vprašanje 8:
Question 8:
Vprašanje 8:
Question 8: Do you agree that the notion of "regulated education and training" could encompass all training recognised by a Member State which is relevant to a profession and not only the training which is explicitly geared towards a specific profession?
Vprašanje 8: Ali bi po vašem mnenju pojem reguliranega izobraževanja in usposabljanja lahko zajemal vse vrste usposabljanja, priznanega v neki državi članici in relevantnega za določen poklic, in ne le usposabljanja, ki izrecno vodi k določenemu poklicu?
QUESTION 8: Do you foresee the need for a better coordination of spectrum at the international and European level?
VPRAŠANJE 8: Ali menite, da obstaja potreba po večjem usklajevanju spektra na mednarodni in evropski ravni?
Question 8: How can school communities best receive the leadership and motivation they need to succeed?
Vprašanje 8: Kako se lahko šolskim skupnostim najbolje zagotovita vodenje in motivacija, ki ju potrebujejo za uspeh?
Question 8: If so, under what conditions should it be possible to obtain it ?
Vprašanje 8: Če je odgovor da, pod kakšnimi pogoji bi jo bilo mogoče pridobiti?
Question 8: Should it be possible to choose the law applicable to joint wills and agreements as to future successions?
Vprašanje 8: Ali je treba priznati izbiro prava, ki se uporablja za skupne oporoke in dedne pogodbe?
Question 8: Should the possibility to choose applicable law be confined to divorce or should it apply also to legal separation and marriage annulment?
Vprašanje 8: Ali bi morala biti možnost izbire prava, ki se uporablja, omejena na razvezo ali bi se morala uporabljati tudi za prenehanje življenjske skupnosti in razveljavitev zakonske zveze?
Question 8: UTPs have a big impact on the ability of farming and food SMEs to invest and innovate.
8. vprašanje: nepoštene trgovinske prakse močno vplivajo na sposobnost MSP, dejavnih v kmetijskem in živilskem sektorju, za naložbe in inovacije.
Question 8: What are the advantages and disadvantages of the abovementioned bio-waste management techniques?
Vprašanje 8: Katere so prednosti in pomanjkljivosti zgoraj navedenih tehnik ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki?
Question 8: What should be the minimum degree of account information required for the issue of an Attachment Order?
Vprašanje 8: Katera mora biti najmanjša stopnja informacij o računu, potrebna za izdajo naloga za zaplembo?
Question 9 What do you think of recognition based on the harmonisation of conflict‑of-law rules?
Vprašanje 9 Kaj menite o priznavanju listin, ki temelji na uskladitvi kolizijskih pravil?
Question 9) Beyond the proposed rules, empirical arguments are welcomed that demonstrate the need for State aid: i) for start-ups independently of the innovativeness criterion, and ii) for innovative SMEs established for more than [5 years].
Vprašanje 9) Poleg predlaganih pravil so dobrodošle tudi empirične utemeljitve, ki dokazujejo potrebo po državni pomoči: i) za novoustanovljena podjetja brez upoštevanja merila inovativnosti in ii) za inovativna MSP, ki delujejo dlje od [5 let].
Question 9.1: What is in your view the added value of cooperation with the OCTs in trade-related areas in response to globalisation and the erosion of their trade preferences vis-à-vis the Community?
Vprašanje 9.1: Katera je po vašem mnenju dodana vrednost sodelovanja s ČDO na področjih, povezanih s trgovino, kot odgovor na globalizacijo in upadanje trgovinskih preferencialov glede na Skupnost?
Question 9.2: How could the OCT-EC association contribute to improving the situation in OCTs more actively in this regard?
Vprašanje 9.2: Kako lahko pridružitev ČDO-ES v tem smislu bolj dejavno prispeva k izboljšanju položaja v ČDO?
Question 9:
Vprašanje 9:
Question 9: Do you agree that the courts having jurisdiction for the merits of the case under relevant Community law and/or the courts where the account is situated should be competent to grant an attachment order?
Vprašanje 9: Ali se strinjate s tem, da bi morala biti sodišča, ki imajo pristojnost za odločanje o glavnih dejstvih zadeve v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti in/ali sodišča, kjer se račun nahaja, pristojna za odobritev naloga za zaplembo?
QUESTION 9: Do you consider that the current IPR rules are adequate to ensure that innovators will be able to benefit from their activities while allowing users to enjoy these innovations?
VPRAŠANJE 9: Ali menite, da so obstoječa pravila glede intelektualne lastnine ustrezna za zagotovitev, da bodo inovatorji lahko imeli koristi od svojih dejavnosti, medtem ko bodo uporabnikom omogočili izkoriščanje teh inovacij?
Question 9: Should a spouse be allowed to choose the law applicable to his/her matrimonial property scheme as the law applicable to his/her succession?
Vprašanje 9: Ali je treba zakoncu dovoliti izbiro prava, ki ureja njegovo zakonsko zvezo, za uporabo pri njegovem dedovanju?
Question 9: The impact of UTPs in business-to-business relations on consumers is examined in detail in a specific study5.
9. vprašanje: vpliv nepoštenih trgovinskih praks med podjetji na potrošnike je podrobno analiziran v posebni študiji.
Question 9: The impact of UTPs in business-to-business relations on consumers is examined in detail in a specific study5.
9. vprašanje: vpliv nepoštenih trgovinskih praks med podjetji na potrošnike je podrobno analiziran v posebni študiji5.
Question 9: What degree of harmonization do you consider appropriate for the European Assets Declaration ?
Vprašanje 9: Kakšna stopnja usklajenosti evropske izjave o premoženju se vam zdi primerna?
Question 9: What should be the appropriate formal requirements for the parties’ agreement on the choice of law?
Vprašanje 9: Kakšne bi morale biti ustrezne formalne zahteve za sporazum strank o izbiri prava?
Question 9: Which agricultural and agri-food products should be eligible and what criteria should be used to decide?
Vprašanje 9: Kateri kmetijski proizvodi in živila bi morali biti upravičeni in kakšna bi morala biti merila za to?
Question 9: Would you support the deletion of the classification outlined in Article 11 (including Annex II)?
Vprašanje 9: Ali podpirate črtanje razvrstitve iz člena 11 (vključno s Prilogo II)?
Question A1: In your opinion, which is the best approach to the review of the consumer legislation?
Vprašanje A1: Kateri je po vašem mnenju najboljši pristop za pregled zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov?
Question A2: What should be the scope of a possible horizontal instrument?
Vprašanje A2: Katera bi morala biti področja uporabe morebitnega horizontalnega akta?
Question A3: What should be the level of harmonisation of the revised directives/the new instrument?
Vprašanje A3: Kakšna bi morala biti raven usklajevanja revidiranih direktiv/novega akta?
Question A:
Vprašanje A:
Question A: Should there be special rules on disclosure of documentary evidence in civil proceedings for damages under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty?
Vprašanje A: Ali so potrebna posebna pravila o razkritju dokumentarnih dokazov v civilnih postopkih za odškodnine iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES?
Question and answer session
Vprašanja in odgovori
Question B1: How should the notions of consumer and professional be defined?
Vprašanje B1: Kako bi morala biti opredeljena pojma potrošnik in poslovni subjekt?
Question B2: Should contracts between private persons be considered as consumer contracts when one of the parties acts through a professional intermediary?
Vprašanje B2: Ali bi se morale pogodbe med fizičnimi osebami obravnavati kot potrošniške pogodbe, če ena od strani posluje prek poslovnega subjekta kot posrednika?
Question B:
Vprašanje B:
Question B: Are special rules regarding access to documents held by a competition authority helpful for antitrust damages claims?
Vprašanje B: Ali bi bila pri odškodninskih zahtevkih v zadevah zaradi kršitev protimonopolnega prava v pomoč posebna pravila glede dostopa do dokumentov, ki so v lasti organa, pristojnega za konkurenco?
Question C:
Vprašanje C:
Question C: Should a horizontal instrument include an overarching duty for professionals to act in accordance with the principles of good faith and fair dealing?
Vprašanje C: Ali bi moral horizontalni akt vključevati daljnosežno obveznost poslovnih subjektov, da naj delujejo v skladu z načeloma dobre vere in pravičnega ravnanja?
Question D1: To what extent should the discipline of unfair contract terms also cover individually negotiated terms?
Vprašanje D1: Do kolikšne mere bi morala pravila o nepravičnih pogodbenih pogojih vključevati tudi individualno dogovorjene pogoje?
Question D2: What should be the status of any list of unfair contract terms to be included in a horizontal instrument?
Vprašanje D2: Kakšen bi moral biti status kakršnega koli seznama nepravičnih pogodbenih pogojev, ki bi bil vključen v horizontalni akt?
Question D3: Should the scope of the unfairness test of the directive on unfair terms be extended?
Vprašanje D3: Ali bi se moral obseg preizkusa nepravičnosti direktive o nedovoljenih pogojih razširiti?
Question D:
Vprašanje D:
Question D: Should there be a fault requirement for antitrust-related damages actions?
Vprašanje D: Ali bi morala obstajati zahteva po dokazovanju krivde za odškodninske tožbe v zvezi s protimonopolnim pravom?
Question E:
Vprašanje E:
Question E: How should damages be defined?
Vprašanje E: Kako naj se opredelijo odškodnine?
Question E: What contractual effects should be given to the failure to comply with information requirements in the consumer acquis?
Vprašanje E: Kakšni naj bi bili pogodbeni učinki v primeru neizpolnjevanja zahtev glede obveščanja iz pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov?
Question F1: Should the length of the cooling-off periods be harmonised across the consumer acquis?
Vprašanje F1: Ali bi se morala dolžina obdobij za razmislek uskladiti v celotnem pravnem redu Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov?
Question F2: How should the right of withdrawal be exercised?
Vprašanje F2: Kako naj bi se uveljavljala pravica do odstopa od pogodbe?
Question F3: Which costs should be imposed on consumers in the event of withdrawal?
Vprašanje F3: Kakšni stroški bi morali biti uvedeni za potrošnike v primeru odstopa od pogodbe?
Question F:
Vprašanje F:
Question F: Which method should be used for calculating the quantum of damages?
Vprašanje F: Katera metoda naj se uporabi za izračun količinskega zneska odškodnine?
Question G1: Should the horizontal instrument provide for general contractual remedies available to consumers?
Vprašanje G1: Ali bi moral horizontalni akt določati splošna pogodbena pravna sredstva, ki so potrošnikom na razpolago?
Question G2: Should the horizontal instrument grant consumers a general right to damages for breach of contract?
Vprašanje G2: Ali naj bi potrošniki v skladu s horizontalnim aktom imeli splošno pravico do odškodnine v primeru kršitve pogodbe?
Question G:
Vprašanje G:
Question G: Should there be rules on the admissibility and operation of the passing-on defence?
Vprašanje G: Ali bi morala obstajati pravila o sprejemljivosti in delovanju ugovora prenašanja naprej?
Question G: Should there be rules on the admissibility and operation of the passing-on defence?
Vprašanje G: Ali bi morala obstajati pravila o sprejemljivosti in delovanju »ugovora prenašanja naprej«?
Question H1: Should the rules on consumer sales cover additional types of contracts under which goods are supplied or digital content services are provided to consumers?
Vprašanje H1: Ali bi morala pravila o potrošniški prodaji vključevati dodatne vrste pogodb, po katerih so potrošniki oskrbljeni z blagom ali so jim ponujene storitve z digitalno vsebino?
Question H2: Should the rules on consumer sales apply to second-hand goods sold at public auctions?
Vprašanje H2: Ali bi se morala pravila za potrošniško prodajo uporabljati za rabljeno blago, ki se prodaja na javnih dražbah?
Question H:
Vprašanje H:
Question H: Should special procedures be available for bringing collective actions and protecting consumer interests?
Vprašanje H: Ali naj bodo na voljo posebni postopki za vložitev skupinskih tožb in zaščito potrošniških interesov?
Question I1: How should delivery be defined?
Vprašanje I1: Kako bi morala biti opredeljena dobava?
Question I2: How should the passing of the risk in consumer sales be regulated?
Vprašanje I2: Kako bi se moral urejati prenos tveganja pri potrošniških prodajah?
Question I:
Vprašanje I:
Question I: Should special rules be introduced to reduce the cost risk for the claimant?
Vprašanje I: Ali bi bilo treba uvesti posebna pravila za zmanjšanje tveganja, povezanega s stroški, za tožnika?
Question J1: Should the horizontal instrument extend the time limits applying to lack of conformity for the period during which remedies were performed?
Vprašanje J1: Ali bi po horizontalnem aktu morali biti roki v primeru neskladnosti podaljšani za obdobje, v katerem so bila izvedena pravna sredstva?
Question J2: Should the guarantee be automatically extended in case of repair of the goods to cover recurring defects?
Vprašanje J2: Ali bi moralo biti jamstvo avtomatično podaljšano v primeru popravila blaga, tako da bi vključevalo ponovna popravila zaradi iste napake?
Question J3: Should specific rules exist for second hand-goods?
Vprašanje J3: Ali bi morala obstajati specifična pravila za rabljeno blago?
Question J4: Who should bear the burden to prove that the defects existed already at the time of delivery?
Vprašanje J4: Kdo bi moral dokazati, da so napake ob času dobave že obstajale?
Question J:
Vprašanje J:
Question J: How can optimum coordination of private and public enforcement be achieved?
Vprašanje J: Kako se lahko doseže optimalno usklajevanje zasebnega uveljavljanja in javnega izvrševanja konkurenčnega prava?
Question K1: Should the consumer be free to choose any of the available remedies?
Vprašanje K1: Ali bi moralo biti potrošniku dovoljeno, da svobodno izbira razpoložljiva pravna sredstva?
Question K2: Should consumers have to notify the seller of the lack of conformity?
Vprašanje K2: Ali bi morali potrošniki prodajalca obvestiti o neskladnosti?
Question K:
Vprašanje K:
Question K: Which substantive law should be applicable to antitrust damages claims?
Vprašanje K: Katero materialno pravo naj se uporablja za odškodninske zahtevke v primerih kršitve protimonopolnega prava?
Question L:
Vprašanje L:
Question L: Should an expert, whenever needed, be appointed by the court?
Vprašanje L: Ali naj strokovnjaka, kadar je ta potreben, imenuje sodišče?
Question L: Should the horizontal instrument introduce direct liability of producers for non-conformity?
Vprašanje L: Ali bi s horizontalnim aktom morala biti uvedena neposredna odgovornost proizvajalcev za neskladnost?
Question M1: Should a horizontal instrument provide for a default content of a commercial guarantee?
Vprašanje M1: Ali bi moral horizontalni akt določati standardno vsebino tržnih garancij?
Question M2: Should a horizontal instrument regulate the transferability of the commercial guarantee?
Vprašanje M2: Ali bi moral horizontalni akt urejati prenosljivost tržne garancije?
Question M3: Should the horizontal instrument regulate commercial guarantees limited to a specific part?
Vprašanje M3: Ali bi moral horizontalni akt urejati tržne garancije, omejene na določen del?
Question M:
Vprašanje M:
Question M: Should limitation periods be suspended?
Vprašanje M: Ali naj se zastaralni roki prekinejo?
Question N:
Vprašanje N: