natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Committee's conclusions noted that an extensive consultation forum would be established where the EU, the status of the accession negotiations and Iceland's negotiating positions in individual areas would be discussed.
Odbor je v svojih sklepih napovedal, da bo za razpravo o vprašanjih v zvezi z EU, o stanju pristopnih pogajanj in pogajalskih izhodiščih na posameznih področjih ustanovljen obsežen forum za posvetovanje.
The Committee's consultative role enables its members to participate in the European Union decision-making process.
Svetovalna naloga Odbora omogoča njegovim članom sodelovanje v postopku odločanja Evropske unije.
The Committee's consultative role enables its members, and hence the organisations they represent, to participate in the European Union decision–making process.
Svetovalna naloga Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora (EESO) omogoča njegovim članom in organizacijam, ki jih ti zastopajo, sodelovanje v postopku odločanja Evropske unije.
the Committee's contribution should be prepared by an ad hoc group of six or nine members, including a president, a rapporteur and possibly a co-rapporteur.
prispevek Odbora pripravi ad hoc skupina, sestavljena iz 6–9 članov, ki imenuje predsednika, poročevalca in morebiti tudi soporočevalca.
The Committee's detailed views on the five questions put in the European Commission's White Paper are set out below.
Podrobna stališča Odbora glede petih vprašanj iz bele knjige Evropske komisije so navedena v nadaljevanju.
The Committee's discussions actively involve not only the usual social partners, i.e. employers and workers, but also all the other socio-occupational interests represented.
V dialogu med člani Odbora ne sodelujejo le običajni socialni partnerji, torej delodajalci in delavci, temveč tudi predstavniki drugih socialno-poklicnih interesov.
The Committee's earlier opinion Towards a Pan-European system of IWT left out a detailed discussion of the sector's social policy with a view to its complex architecture but referred to this follow-up opinion.
V enem izmed prejšnjih mnenj o vseevropskem sistemu rečne plovbe Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor zaradi zapletene strukture ni podrobno obravnaval socialne politike sektorja, ampak je bralca raje napotil na dodatno mnenje.
The Committee's earlier opinion Towards a Pan-European system of IWT left out a detailed discussion of the sector's social policy with a view to its complex architecture but referred to this follow-up opinion.
V enem izmed prejšnjih mnenj o vseevropskem sistemu rečne plovbe Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor zaradi zapletene strukture ni podrobno obravnaval socialne politike sektorja, ampak je bralca raje napotil na to dodatno mnenje.
The Committee's exploratory opinion of April 20046 already called for agriculture to be included as a chapter in its own right.
Že v mnenju na lastno pobudo aprila 20046 je EESO med drugim zahteval, da se kmetijstvu nameni posebno poglavje.
The Committee's fears are based on the fact that past practice has not always favoured the full involvement of civil society organisations.
Odbor je zaskrbljen zato, ker dosedanja praksa ni spodbujala polne vključenosti akterjev civilne družbe.
The Committee's future
Prihodnost Odbora
The Committee's intention is to identify and implement Community measures aimed at precisely defining, monitoring and dealing with the problem in all its different aspects – social, economic and legal.
Namen EESO je, da bi na ravni Skupnosti določili in izvajali ukrepe, s katerimi bi natančno opredelili, spremljali in obravnavali pojav z vseh vidikov: socialnega, gospodarskega in pravnega.
The Committee's intention is to identify and implement Community measures aimed at precisely defining, monitoring and dealing with the problem in all its different aspects – social, economic and legal.
Namen EESO je, da bi na ravni Skupnosti določili in izvajali ukrepe, s katerimi bi natančno opredelili, spremljali in obravnavali pojav z vseh vidikov: socialnih, gospodarskih in pravnih.
The Committee's long-standing wish to see independent social dialogue in the ports sector has also recently been fulfilled.
Poleg tega je bila pred kratkim izpolnjena tudi dolgoletna želja Odbora glede vzpostavitve neodvisnega socialnega dialoga v pristaniškem sektorju.
The Committee's long-standing wish to see social dialogue in the ports sector has also recently been fulfilled.
Poleg tega je bila pred kratkim izpolnjena tudi dolgoletna želja Odbora glede vzpostavitve socialnega dialoga v pristaniškem sektorju.
The Committee's members play a crucial role in explaining EU policies in their own countries, listening to the public's interests and needs and channelling this feedback into the debate in Brussels.
Člani Odbora igrajo glavno vlogo pri pojasnjevanju politik EU v svojih državah, ko prisluhnejo interesom in potrebam javnosti ter ta na podlagi tega sooblikujejo razpravo v Bruslju.
The Committee's misgivings concern the choice of instrument, i.e. a new directive, as it thinks that the same aims could have been achieved more simply and quickly by other means.
Odbor ima pomisleke glede izbire instrumenta, tj. nove direktive, saj meni, da bi bili lahko isti cilji hitreje in preprosteje doseženi z drugimi sredstvi.
The Committee's opinion also calls on Member States to take appropriate measures to address "energy poverty", e.g. by supporting energy production at the lowest possible prices.
Odbor v svojem mnenju države članice poziva tudi, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za soočanje s "pomanjkanjem energije", npr. podporo proizvodnje energije po najnižjih možnih cenah.
The Committee's opinion follows on its previous one on "Assessing the sustainable development strategy" adopted in April 2004 (CESE 661/2004 - NAT/229).
Mnenje Odbora je nadaljevanje predhodnega mnenja o ocenjevanju strategije trajnostnega razvoja, sprejetega aprila 2004 (CESE 661/2004 – NAT/229).
The Committee's opinion gives detailed answers to the 19 questions posed in the Green Paper.
V mnenju Odbora so podani podrobni odgovori na 19 vprašanj, ki jih zelena knjiga zastavlja.
The Committee's opinion is that economic growth and innovation in European economy can only be achieved on a viable industrial basis.
Odbor meni, da je gospodarsko rast in inovacije v evropskem gospodarstvu mogoče doseči le na trdni industrijski podlagi.
The Committee's opinion on "The development of regional areas for the management of fish stocks and the control of fishing" states that "the Committee welcomes the intention to radically reform the CFP and in particular its objective to establish a de-centralised policy, less dependent on detailed decisions taken in Brussels and allowing more opportunity for local and regional involvement in fisheries management.
Mnenje Odbora o "razvoju regionalnih območij za upravljanje s staleži rib in nadzor ribolova" potrjuje, da "Odbor pozdravlja namero o koreniti reformi SRP in še zlasti njen cilj uveljaviti decentralizirano politiko, ki je manj odvisna od podrobnih odločitev, sprejetih v Bruslju, in ki omogoča več priložnosti za lokalno in regionalno sodelovanje pri upravljanju ribištva.
The Committee's Opinion on Combating Computer Crime11 argued against anonymity on the Internet and asked for an international management body for the Internet with extensive public authority involvement.
Mnenje Odbora o boju proti računalniškemu kriminalu11 nasprotuje anonimnosti na internetu in zahteva ustanovitev mednarodnega telesa z velikim javnim vplivom.
The Committee's opinion on the proposed Regulation concerning ENISA14 highlighted the importance of training of law enforcement personnel.
Odbor je v svojem mnenju o predlogu uredbe o agenciji ENISA14 opozoril na pomen usposabljanja osebja kazenskega pregona.
The Committee's opinion on the proposed Regulation concerning ENISA21 highlighted the importance of training of law enforcement personnel.
Odbor je v svojem mnenju o predlogu uredbe o agenciji ENISA21 opozoril na pomen usposabljanja osebja s področja kazenskega pregona.
The Committee's opinion ought not to advocate weakening the EU's negotiating position in this way.
Odbor se v mnenju ne sme zavzemati za takšno oslabitev pogajalskega položaja EU.
The Committee's opinion suggested that the latter derogation should not be applicable during the first three years, so that the effects of a blanket ban could be observed, and the technical aspects of the derogations system could be fine-tuned.
Odbor v mnenju predlaga, da slednja izjema ne bi veljala prva tri leta, da bi videli učinek popolne prepovedi, poleg tega pa izpopolnili sistem izjem.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 124 votes, with four abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 120 glasovi za in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 134 votes to none, with two abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 134 glasovi za in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 135 votes to 3, with 4 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 135 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 156 votes, with no votes against and four abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 156 glasovi za in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 161 votes, with 3 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 161 glasovi za in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 165 votes to two with six abstentions.
Mnenje je bilo sprejeto s 165 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 168 votes to none, with 3 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 168 glasovi za in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 171 votes to none, with two abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 171 glasovi za, nobenim glasom proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 179 votes to 4 with 3 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 179 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 81 votes to 1 with 7 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto z 81 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was adopted by 88 votes to none, with 11 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto z 88 glasovi za in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to the vote and adopted by 104 votes to 13, with 4 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo nato dano na glasovanje in sprejeto s 104 glasovi za, 13 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to the vote and adopted by 115 votes to 40, with 12 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 115 glasovi za, 40 glasovi proti in 12 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to the vote and adopted by 121 votes to one with three abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 121 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to the vote and adopted by 183 votes with 14 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 183 glasovi za in 14 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 105 votes to 2 and 4 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 105 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 111 to one and four abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 111 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 129 votes to 1, with 1 abstention.
Sprejeto je bilo s 129 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 132 votes to two with three abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 132 glasovi za, 2 glasoma proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 137 votes to eight and 19 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 137 glasovi za, 8 glasovi proti in 19 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 140 votes in favour, and four against.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 140 glasovi za in 4 glasovi proti.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 141 votes to 3, with 5 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 141 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 148 votes to seven with ten abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 148 glasovi za, 7 glasovi proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 149 votes for with 7 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 149 glasovi za in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 192 votes for to 4, with 4 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 192 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 76 votes for, with 3 against.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 76 glasovi za in 3 glasovi proti.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 98 votes for, 2 votes against with 3 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto z 98 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted by 98 votes to seven, with eight abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo nato sprejeto s 98 glasovi za, 7 glasovi proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion was then put to vote and adopted unanimously.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto soglasno.
The Committee's opinion, thus amended, was then put to vote and adopted by 103 votes to 4 and 9 abstentions.
Člani so glasovali za tako spremenjeno mnenje Odbora in ga sprejeli s 103 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Committee's opinion2 of 11 July 2013 on the fourth railway package supports the aim to complete the implementation of a common single rail market in Europe to provide high-quality transport with no problems at borders.
EESO je v mnenju2 z dne 11. julija 2013 o četrtem železniškem paketu podprl cilj, da se dokončno oblikuje enotni trg železniškega prometa v Evropi, ki bi zagotavljal kakovosten prevoz brez težav na mejah.
The Committee's Opinion2 on "TTIP and its impact on SMEs" is relevant here.
Tu velja omeniti mnenje EESO o vplivu čezatlantskega partnerstva za trgovino in naložbe na MSP2.
The Committee's opinions should, where possible, be fact-based.
Mnenja Odbora bi morala po možnosti temeljiti na dejstvih.
THE COMMITTEE'S OWN AFFAIRS
AFFAIRES INTÉRIEURES DU CESE
The Committee's own-initiative opinion addressed to the June 2006 European Council, as adopted on 17 May 2006,
mnenje Odbora na lastno pobudo, sprejeto 17. maja 2006, ki je bilo predloženo Evropskemu svetu junija 2006;
the Committee's participation in the six Commission co-financed "Plan-D" projects;
sodelovanje Odbora v šestih projektih v okviru Načrta D, ki jih sofinancira Komisija;
The Committee's political objective is to present what might be termed a civil society manifesto to the other institutions, the European Parliament, the Commission and the Council in particular, in order to support their actions with a view to achieving Europe's shared goals.
Politični cilj Odbora je predstaviti drugim evropskim institucijam, zlasti Evropskemu parlamentu, Komisiji in Svetu, neke vrste manifest civilne družbe, ki bi podprl njihove ukrepe, namenjene doseganju skupnih evropskih ciljev.
The Committee's political priorities in relation to the European Commission's annual work programme
Politične prednostne naloge Odbora ob upoštevanju letnega delovnega programa Evropske komisije
The Committee's position was one that supported a European perspective for Ukraine.
Stališče Odbora pomeni podporo evropski perspektivi za Ukrajino.
the Committee's possible role with regard to the implementation of the citizens' right of initiative both in its consultative function and as an institutional intermediary between organised civil society and the EU institutions,
možno vlogo Odbora kot posvetovalnega organa in institucionalnega posrednika med organizirano civilno družbo in institucijami EU pri uresničevanju pravice državljanov do pobude;
the Committee's potential monitoring role in verifying that the horizontal social clause in the new Treaty is respected and that social requirements are taken into account in the Union's policies (if European law is contrary to the social objectives, it could be declared void by the Court of Justice),
potencialno vlogo Odbora pri spremljanju: preverjanje, ali se horizontalna socialna klavzula v novi Pogodbi spoštuje in ali se v politikah Unije upoštevajo socialne zahteve (če je evropska zakonodaja v nasprotju s socialnimi cilji, jo lahko Sodišče razglasi za nično);
the Committee's potential role as the platform, at EU level, for structured dialogue between the EU's institutions and organised civil society, working in partnership with those institutions (Article 11 TEU),
potencialno vlogo Odbora kot platforme na ravni EU, ki bi v partnerstvu z institucijami EU zagotavljala strukturiran dialog med temi institucijami in organizirano civilno družbo (člen 11 PEU);
The Committee's proposal aims at developing and strengthening major European operators responsible for CC mega-centres, the future European digital industry.
Cilj predloga Odbora je nastanek in krepitev velikih evropskih akterjev, zadolženih za megasredišča računalništva v oblaku: prihodnja evropska digitalna industrija.
The Committee's proposals are grouped under four headings, namely: economic recovery; fundamental rights and the European social model; sustainable development; governance.
Predlogi Odbora se nanašajo na štiri teme: oživitev gospodarstva, temeljne pravice in evropski socialni model, trajnostni razvoj in upravljanje.
The Committee's proposals are set out below.
Odbor v nadaljevanju oblikuje svoje predloge.
The Committee's recent "Maritime and coastal package" opinion6 is a valuable example of how diverging interests can be linked in a coherent, complementary and synergetic fashion.
Nedavno mnenje odbora „Pomorski in obalni paket“6 je dragocen primer, kako je mogoče različne interese povezati skladno ter medsebojno dopolnjevalno.
The Committee's recommendation is therefore that all those responsible for developing the European research area should reduce this diversity and variety in the legal, administrative and financial rules within the R&D framework programme: the rules governing the R&D framework programmes need to be harmonised/simplified and scaled back.
Zato Odbor vsem, ki so odgovorni za vzpostavitev evropskega raziskovalnega prostora, priporoča, da poskrbijo za zmanjšanje teh razlik in raznovrstnosti pravno-upravnih in finančnih pravil v okvirnem programu R&R: potrebna je uskladitev, poenotenje in zmanjšanje vseh pravil v zvezi z okvirnimi programi R&R.
The Committee's recommendations are therefore addressed in particular to the Council, the Parliament and the Member States, urging them to take all the necessary steps to again make Europe the global leader in research and development and to put in place the requisite measures needed to achieve this goal.
Zato Odbor svoja priporočila naslavlja zlasti na Svet, Parlament in države članice, naj naredijo vse, kar je v njihovi moči, da bi raziskave in razvoj v Evropi spet osvojili svetovni vrh, in sprejmejo za to potrebne ukrepe.
The Committee's relationship with the national ESCs has continued to be very constructive, particularly as regards the Lisbon Strategy: the national ESCs will play an active part in both the conference of 17 March 2010 on the economic crisis and the biennial conference in Florence.
Sodelovanje z nacionalnimi ekonomsko-socialnimi sveti se nadaljuje na zelo visoki ravni, zlasti v okviru lizbonske strategije: na konferenci o gospodarski krizi 17. marca 2010 in dvoletni konferenci v Firencah bodo aktivno sodelovali nacionalni ESS.
The Committee's remarks on ICT also apply to the transport and space sub-programmes (e.g. aeronautics).
Opomba v zvezi z IKT velja tudi za podprograma Promet in Aeronavtika (npr. letalstvo).
The Committee's reservations are highlighted at various points in sections 4 and 5 of the Opinion.
Odbor izraža zadržek glede več odstavkov v točkah 4 in 5 mnenja.
the Committee's Resolution made as a contribution to the European Council of 21 and 22 June 2007 – Roadmap for the constitutional process, as adopted on 30 May 2007 (CESE 640/2007);
resolucija Odbora: Časovni načrt za ustavni proces, ki je bila pripravljena kot prispevek za Evropski svet z dne 8. in 9. marca 2007 ter sprejeta 30. maja 2007 (CESE 640/2007);
The Committee's role as watchdog reminding the EU of its sustainable development commitments remained important.
vloga Odbora kot varuha, ki opozarja EU na njene zaveze glede trajnostnega razvoja, je ostala pomembna;
The Committee's scepticism as to whether the CAP is genuinely moving in the right direction is reinforced by the fact that, for the 2007-2013 financing period, the heads of state or government have slashed the resources available under the second CAP pillar that is particularly important for the development of sustainable agriculture.
Dvome Odbora o tem, ali se SKP res razvija v pravi smeri, potrjuje dejstvo, da so voditelji držav in vlad v okviru finančnega obdobja 2007–2013 bistveno zmanjšali sredstva za drugi steber SKP, ki je zlasti pomemben za razvoj trajnostnega kmetijstva.
The Committee's scepticism as to whether the CAP is genuinely moving in the right direction is reinforced by the fact that, for the 2007-2013 financing period, the heads of state or government have slashed the resources available under the second CAP pillar that is particularly important for the development of sustainable agriculture.
Dvome Odbora o tem, ali se SKP zares razvija v pravi smeri, potrjuje dejstvo, da so voditelji držav in vlad v okviru finančnega obdobja 2007–2013 bistveno zmanjšali sredstva za drugi steber SKP, ki je zlasti pomemben za razvoj trajnostnega kmetijstva.
The Committee's scepticism seems confirmed by the Commission's own cautious position expressed as follows: Result-based approaches require a careful definition of output/result at the level of each individual project and a thorough analysis in order to fix lump sums (…).
Previdnost Komisije si Odbor razlaga kot potrditev za svojo zadržanost, kajti Komisija navaja: Pristopi, ki temeljijo na rezultatih, zahtevajo skrbno opredelitev rezultatov („output“) na ravni vsakega posameznega projekta in temeljito analizo za določitev pavšalnih zneskov
The Committee's Single Market Observatory is a pragmatic instrument designed to feel the pulse of organised civil society in the Member States, to identify where the market's functioning could be improved or where obstacles are preventing citizens from enjoying the full benefits of the market.
Opazovalna skupina za enotni trg pri EESO je pragmatični instrument za ugotavljanje stanja organizirane civilne družbe v državah članicah in s tem področij, na katerih je mogoče izboljšati delovanje trga, ali ovir, ki državljanom preprečujejo polno izkoriščanje prednosti, ki jih ponuja enotni trg.
The Committee's Single Market Observatory should undertake constant monitoring of EFSI deployment for SMEs using impact indicators.
Opazovalna skupina za enotni trg pri Odboru bi morala s kazalniki učinka stalno spremljati uporabo EFSI za MSP.
The Committee's status was for the moment guaranteed by the Treaties: good administrative and financial practice must be at the heart of all EU bodies and institutions' concerns.
Dejal je, da je status Odbora za zdaj zagotovljen s pogodbami in da mora biti dobro upravno in finančno poslovanje v središču skrbi vseh institucij in organov Evropske unije.
The Committee's subsidiarity monitoring is expressed either via its opinions, the activities of the Subsidiarity Monitoring Network (SMN) or via contributions which regional parliaments with legislative powers provided to national Parliaments under the subsidiarity control mechanism.
Spremljanje subsidiarnosti s strani Odbora regij se izraža bodisi prek njegovih mnenj, dejavnosti mreže za nadzor subsidiarnosti ali prek prispevkov, ki so jih regionalni parlamenti z zakonodajnimi pooblastili posredovali nacionalnim parlamentom v okviru mehanizma za nadzor subsidiarnosti.