natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mr Pater believed that it would be appropriate to hold the discussion during a subsequent meeting on the basis of a document available in all languages, and after the Staff Committee and the secretariat have been able to express their opinion on this revised proposal.
PATER je menil, da bi bilo o tem ustrezneje razpravljati na poznejši seji na podlagi dokumenta, ki bi bil preveden v vse jezike, potem ko bi odbor osebja in sekretariat izrazila svoje stališče glede tega spremenjenega predloga.
Mr Pater explained his proposed rewording of Rule 3(1), which may not have been reproduced correctly in all language versions of the rapporteur's document, and which should be corrected as follows: "The election of the Bureau members shall comply with the principle of observing the overall and geographical balance between the groups, with at least one representative from each Member State.
PATER je pojasnil pomen svojega predloga besedila člena 3(1), ki naj ne bi bilo pravilno prevedeno v vseh jezikovnih različicah dokumenta poročevalca in bi ga bilo treba popraviti takole: "Pri volitvah članov predsedstva je treba upoštevati celotno in geografsko uravnoteženost med skupinami, vsako državo mora zastopati vsaj en član.
Mr Pater presented his amendment to chapter 2.3, and insisted that it be dealt with as a whole, even though it involved a number of individual points.
PATER je predstavil svoj amandma k točki 2.3 in vztrajal, da se obravnava kot celota, čeprav gre za posamične točke.
Mr Pater proposed that - in view of the risks which had been mentioned regarding the maintenance of equal treatment between staff - the Panel should simply adopt the elements common to both proposals (that from the secretariat and that introduced by Group I), and that it should come back later to the specific proposal concerning the status of staff working for the groups.
PATER je predlagal, da se – glede na omenjene nevarnosti za ohranjanje enake obravnave uslužbencev – komisija omeji na potrditev elementov, ki so skupni obema predlogoma (ki ju je dala I. skupina), in da se pozneje znova vrne k posebnemu predlogu o statusu uslužbencev v skupinah.
Mr Pater proposed that the sections be allowed to launch the work of study groups without waiting for members to be designated by the groups.
PATER, ki je predlagal, da bi strokovne skupine lahko začele delo v študijskih skupinah tudi če skupine ne imenujejo članov; predsednik, g.
Mr Pater reminded the panel that in fact the issue was only of relevance to REX section meetings and then stated that he would be willing to include restrictions, as suggested by Mr Zufiaur.
PATER je opozoril, da gre v bistvu samo za vprašanje sej strokovne skupine REX, nato pa izrazil pripravljenost, da sprejme nekaj omejitev, kot jih je navedel g.
Mr Pater requested that the representatives of officials and other staff employed by the EESC also be able to comment on the proposals.
PATER je tudi zahteval, naj predstavniki uradnikov in uslužbencev, zaposlenih v Odboru, dobijo možnost, da podajo svoje mnenje o teh predlogih.
Mr Pater said that the imminent entry into force of the new Treaty required the Panel to submit its proposals in good time (probably by March 2010).
PATER, ki je opozoril, da mora komisija zaradi skorajšnjega začetka veljavnosti nove pogodbe svoje predloge pravočasno predstaviti (najverjetneje do marca 2010).
Mr Pater stated his willingness to find a compromise between the positions expressed by the other members and went on to point out that since the Treaties did not make provision for the representation of members on a Member State basis, this should not take precedence over a democratic principle.
PATER je povedal, da je pripravljen na iskanje kompromisa med stališči, ki so jih izrazili drugi člani, in nato spomnil, da merilo zastopanosti članov na podlagi države ni določeno v pogodbah in zato ne bi smelo imeti prednosti pred demokratičnim načelom.
Mr Pater stressed, in particular, the importance of providing for greater flexibility when it came to setting up study groups.
PATER, ki je predvsem poudaril, da je pri sestavljanju študijskih skupin pomembno zagotoviti več manevrskega prostora, g.
Mr Pater suggested, among other things, an alternative wording to that proposed by the rapporteur which would ensure a more balanced composition based on nationality and group membership.
PATER je med drugim predlagal drugačno besedilo od tistega, ki ga je predlagal poročevalec.
Mr Pater then addressed the chairman, calling for clarification of whether, from the viewpoint of the Staff Committee, the correction highlighted by Mr Stantič was likely to modify its judgement of the proposal as a whole.
G. PATER se je nato obrnil na predsednika s prošnjo, da se razjasni, ali popravek, ki ga je omenil g.
Mr Pater, and the president of the Consultative Commission on Industrial Change, Mr van Iersel
PATRA, in predsednika posvetovalne komisije za spremembe v industriji, g.
Mr Pater, however, noted that he was agreeing to this solution on the condition that the secretariat could confirm that the proposed text did indeed allow the group presidents to appoint study group members and rapporteurs without waiting for the section meeting.
PATER je kljub temu dejal, da to rešitev sprejme pod pogojem, da sekretariat preveri, ali predlagano besedilo predsednikom skupin omogoča začeti z imenovanjem članov študijskih skupin in poročevalcev ne da bi čakali na datum seje strokovne skupine.
Mr Patrice Salsa (for the rapporteur)
(za poročevalca)
Mr Patrick Baudoin (Cat.
Patricka BaudoinA (int.
Mr Patrick Seyler (Gr.
Patrick SEYLER (I. sk.
Mr Patrik Zoltvány (SK – I)
Patrik ZOLTVÁNY (SK – I)
Mr Patrik Zoltvány (SK – I)
Patrik ZOLTVÁNY (SK-I)
Mr Patrizio Pesci
Ilaria SAVOINI
Mr Paul de Beer (for Group II)
Paul de Beer (za II. skupino)
Mr Paul Junck (Gr.
Paul JUNCK (I. sk.
Mr Paul Moloney (for the co-rapporteur)
Paul MOLONEY (za soporočevalca)
Mr Paulo Barros Vale
Paula BARROS VALE
Mr Paulo Fonseca (for the rapporteur)
Paulo FONSECA
Mr Pavel Simek
Pavel SIMEK
Mr Pavel Telicka, for priority project No 27 (“Rail Baltica” Warsaw-Kaunas-Riga-Tallinn-Helsinki rail link).
Pavel Telicka za prednostni projekt št. 27 (“železniška os „Rail Baltica“ Varšava-Kaunas-Riga-Talin-Helsinki”)
Mr Pavel Trantina (CZ-III)
Pavel TRANTINA (CZ-III)
Mr Pavel Trantina (CZ–III)
Pavel TRANTINA (CZ-III)
Mr Pavlikkas (CY-II)
Andreas PAVLIKKAS (CY-II)
Mr Pavol Demeš (for Group I)
Pavol DEMEŠ (za I. skupino)
Mr Pedro Augusto Almeida Freire (PT-I)
Pedro Augusto ALMEIDA FREIRE (PT-I)
Mr Pedro Augusto Almeida Freire (PT-I)
Pedro Augusto ALMEIDA FREIRE (PT-I)
Mr Pedro Barato Triguero (Gr.
Pedro BARATO TRIGUERO (III. sk.
Mr Pedro Gonçalves Paes (for the rapporteur)
Pedro Gonçalves Paes (za poročevalca)
Mr Pedro Narro (ES – III)
Pedro NARRO (ES-III)
Mr Pedro Narro (ES–III)
Pedro NARRO (ES–III)
Mr Pedro Narro Sánchez
Pedra NARRA SÁNCHEZA
Mr Pedro Narro(ES-III)
Pedro NARRO(ES-III)
Mr PEEL
PEEL
Mr Peel (Gr.
Jonathan PEEL (I. sk.
Mr Peel (UK – I)
PEEL (UK – I)
Mr Peel (UK – I)
PEEL (UK–I)
Mr Peel (UK-I)
g. PEEL (UK-I)
Mr Peel (UK–I)
Jonathan PEEL (UK-I)
Mr Peel (UK–I)
Jonathan PEEL (UK–I)
Mr Peel gave the overview of the opinion emphasising the fact that the young people under 25 form the majority of the population in the region, hence strengthening the co-operation with the five countries of Central Asia in the sphere of education is of crucial importance.
Peel je na splošno predstavil mnenje in poudaril, da mlajši od 25 let predstavljajo večino prebivalstva tega dela sveta, zato je krepitev sodelovanja s petimi državami Srednje Azije na področju izobraževanja ključnega pomena.
Mr Peel mover of 10 amendments, motivated his 10 tabled amendments as a measure to take away anti-business tendencies in the draft opinion.
PEEL je svojih 10 vloženih amandmajev pojasnil kot ukrep, da se v osnutku mnenja odpravijo težnje, usmerjene proti podjetjem.
Mr Peel referred the members to the UNODC report, which deals in depth with corruption and commented on the necessity to emphasise combating corruption in the opinion.
Članom je omenil poročilo UNODC, ki podrobneje obravnava korupcijo, in dodal, da je treba v mnenju več poudarka nameniti boju proti korupciji.
Mr Peel started his presentation by referring to previous EESC opinions that had advocated the strengthening of the EU's external energy policy, and to article 194 TFEU as the new solid basis for a better coordination between internal and external aspects of this policy.
Peel je prispevek začel s sklicevanjem na prejšnja mnenja EESO, v katerih se zahteva krepitev zunanjih politik EU o energiji, in na člen 194 PDEU kot novo solidno osnovo za boljše usklajevanje med notranjimi in zunanjimi vidiki te politike.
Mr Peel stated that the figures which are deleted in his amendment do not derive from the OECD report and that the way that paragraph 7.9 was written in the text of the rapporteur is misleading.
PEEL je razložil, da številke, ki jih je v svojem amandmaju črtal, ne izhajajo iz poročila OECD, in da je besedilo točke 7.9, kot ga je predložil poročevalec, zavajajoče.
Mr Peel's amendments to points 2.13 (55 votes to 97, with 16 abstentions), 4.3.1 (68 votes to 103, with 6 abstentions) and 5.4 (65 votes to 105, with 20 abstentions) were put to the vote and rejected.
PEEL, so bili dani na glasovanje in zavrnjeni: 2.13 (55 glasov za, 97 proti, 16 vzdržanih), 4.3.1 (68 glasov za, 103 proti, 6 vzdržanih) in 5.4 (65 glasov za, 105 proti, 20 vzdržanih).
Mr Pegado Liz (Gr.
PEGADO LIZ (III. sk.
Mr Pegado Liz (PT – Gr.
Jorge PEGADO LIZ (PT – III. sk.)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-Gr.
Jorge PEGADO LIZ (PT-III), nato
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-Gr.
Jorge PEGADO LIZ (PT–III), nato
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-GRIII)
Jorge PEGADO LIZ (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-GRIII)
PEGADO LIZ (PT – III. sk.)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Pegado Jorge PEGADO LIZ (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III) (Rule 62 Mr Ribbe)
Jorge PEGADO LIZ (PT-III) (člen 62 – Lutz RIBBE)
Mr Pegado Liz (Rule 62 – Wolf) (PT-III)
Jorge PEGADO LIZ (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz asked the president if, following the wishes expressed recently by the budget group, the activity of the CCMI would be the subject of a policy debate at one of the Bureau's forthcoming meetings.
PEGADO LIZ je predsednika prosil, da se upošteva želja, ki jo je pred kratkim izrazila skupina za proračun, in se o dejavnosti komisije CCMI organizira politična razprava na eni od prihodnjih sej predsedstva.
Mr Pegado Liz commented on the order of business.
Jorge Pegado Liz je podal pripombe k dnevnemu redu.
Mr Pegado Liz considered the citizens' initiative the most important innovation of the Lisbon Treaty.
PEGADA LIZA je državljanska pobuda najpomembnejša novost Lizbonske pogodbe.
Mr Pegado Liz defended the Committee’s decision to take a neutral position, and highlighted the harm that the adoption of a categorical stance could bring to a referendum.
G. PEGADO LIZ je prav tako menil, da mora biti položaj Odbora nevtralen, in posvaril pred negativnim vplivom, ki ga ima lahko zavzetje nejasnega stališča na uspeh referendumov.
Mr Pegado Liz discussed the positive experiences and achievements of his two and a half years of chairing the CCMI.
G. PEGADO LIZ je omenil pozitivne izkušnje in dosežke, ki so zaznamovali dve leti in pol njegovega predsedovanja.
Mr Pegado Liz enquired as to what measures were planned by the Commission on the issue of collective redress in the area of consumer protection, and wondered about the innovative nature of smart regulation.
PEGADO LIZ je vprašal, kakšne pobude namerava Komisija sprejeti na področju skupinskih tožba na področju varstva potrošnikov in v čem je novost koncepta "pametne pravne ureditve".
Mr Pegado Liz expressed his support to the opinion.
Pegado Liz je podprl mnenje.
Mr Pegado Liz had tabled an amendment to add text to the end of point 5.3 as follows:
PEGADO LIZ je vložil amandma, ki dodaja besedilo na koncu točke 5.3:
Mr Pegado Liz had tabled two amendments to modify points 1.1 and 3.1 as follows:
Pegado Liz je vložil dva amandmaja, in sicer k točkama 1.1 in 3.1:
Mr Pegado Liz proposed the following amendment (amendment 1):
PEGADO LIZ je predlagal naslednji amandma (amandma 1):
Mr Pegado Liz proposed the following amendment (amendment 2):
PEGADO LIZ je predlagal naslednji amandma (amandma 2):
Mr Pegado Liz stressed the importance of flexibility over the length of opinions in order to take the complexity of a subject into account.
PEGADO LIZ, ki je vztrajal, da je pri dolžini mnenj pomembna prožnost, da je mogoče upoštevati kompleksnost teme.
Mr Pegado Liz submitted the following amendments:
PEGADO LIZ je vložil naslednje amandmaje:
Mr Pegado Liz then spoke on behalf of the CCMI about the president's programme and the EPC study.
PEGADO LIZ pa je v imenu CCMI govoril o predsednikovem programu in študiji Evropskega političnega centra.
Mr Pegado Liz: cooperation with the Czech Presidency; the Single Market is still in progress and new obstacles arise; the opinion will be presented in Prague at an SMO hearing on legal barriers.
PEGADO LIZ: sodelovanje s češkim predsedstvom; enotni trg se še vedno razvija in pri tem nastajajo nove ovire; mnenje bo predstavljeno v Pragi na posvetovanju opazovalne skupine za enotni trg o zakonodajnih ovirah.
Mr Pekka Ristelä
George MICHAELIDES
Mr Pekka Ristelä (Gr.
Pekka RISTELÄ (II. sk.
Mr Pekka Ristelä (Gr.
Pekko RISTELÄJA (II. sk.
Mr Per Boqvist (for the co-rapporteur)
Per BOQVIST (za soporočevalca)
Mr Per Boqvist (for the Group I)
Per BOQVIST (za I. skupino)
Mr Per Boqvist (for the rapporteur)
(za poročevalca)
Mr Per Klok(DK-Cat.
Per KLOK (DK-kat.
Mr Perales (for the rapporteur)
Albert Alejandro PERALES (za poročevalca)
Mr Perales (for the rapporteur)
Alejandro PERALES ALBERT (za poročevalca)
Mr Pereira Martins (PT – Gr.
PEREIRA MARTINS (PT – III)
Mr Pereira Martins (PT–III)
Carlos Alberto PEREIRA MARTINS (PT – III)
Mr Pereira Martins said that "technically" he agreed with the opinion's approach and drew attention to the dangerous and unfair tendency in some countries to reduce pensions and confiscate pension funds to finance budget deficits and cover "financial holes".
PEREIRA MARTINS je dejal, da se formalno gledano strinja s pristopom, uporabljenim v mnenju, ter opozoril na nevarno in nepošteno ravnanje nekaterih držav, ki poskušajo zmanjšati pokojnine in zapleniti pokojninske sklade za financiranje proračunskega primanjkljaja in zapolnitev "finančnih lukenj".
Mr Pesci
Patrizio pesci
Mr Pesci (IT-Gr. I)
Patrizio PESCI (IT-I)
Mr Pesci (IT-I)
PESCI (I. sk.-IT)
Mr Pesci (Rule 62 – Bedoni)
62 – Bedoni)
Mr Pesci (Rule 62 – Mr Pezzini) (IT-I)
PESCI (člen 62, M. PEZZINI) (IT-I)
Mr Pesci said that he supported the amendments tabled by Mr Braghin, the aim of which was to promote mutual respect between different cultures.
Gospod PESCI se je strinjal z amandmajem gospoda Braghina v zvezi z medsebojnim spoštovanjem različnih kultur.
Mr Peter Booth, delegate, would replace Mr Patrick Itschert (Gr.
Peter BOOTH bo zamenjal Patricka ITSCHERTA (II. sk.
Mr Peter Clever (DE-I)
Peter CLEVER (DE-I)
Mr Peter Coldrick
Grace ATTARD
Mr Peter Dunkel (Group II expert)
Peter DUNKEL (za II. skupino)
Mr Peter Engelhard (for the rapporteur)
Peter ENGELHARD
Mr Peter Korn
Peter KORN
Mr Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Peter MORGAN (UK-I)
Mr Peter Morgan (UK–I)
Peter MORGAN (UK-I)
Mr Peter Sarosi (for Group III)
Peter SAROSI (za III. skupino)
Mr Peter Schmidt (DE-II)
Peter SCHMIDT (DE-II)
Mr Peter Skyte
Petra SKYTA
Mr Peter Verhaeghe, Migration Officer, Caritas-Europa (tbc)
Peter VERHAEGHE, odgovoren za službo za migracije,
Mr Petersen (DE-I)
g. PETERSEN (DE-I)
Mr Petersen (DE-I)
Volker PETERSEN (DE-I)
Mr Petersen (Gr.
2) (g.
Mr Petr Mazzolini (for the rapporteur)
Petr Mazzolini (za poročevalca)
Mr Petri Lempinen (for Group II)
(za II. skupino)
Mr Petropoulos (EL-II)
Georgios PETROPOULOS (EL-II)
Mr Petru Sorin Dandea (RO-II)
Petru Sorin DANDEA (RO-II)
Mr Pezzini (Gr.
Antonello PEZZINI (IT-I)
Mr Pezzini (Gr.
PEZZINI (I. sk.
Mr Pezzini (I-IT)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT – I)
Mr Pezzini (IT-Gr.
Antonello PEZZINI (IT-I)
Mr Pezzini (IT-Gr. I)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT-I)
Mr Pezzini (IT-I)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT – I. sk.)
Mr Pezzini (IT-I)
PLOSCEANU (RO-I)
Mr Pezzini (IT-I) (Rule 62 – Burani)
PEZZINI (IT-I) (člen 62, g.
Mr Pezzini (IT-I) (Rule 62 – de Lotto)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT-I) (Pietro Francesco DE LOTTO, člen 62)
Mr Pezzini (IT-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Durante)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT-I) (Giancarlo DURANTE, člen 62)
Mr Pezzini (IT-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Rotti)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT-I) (Claudio ROTTI, člen 62)
Mr Pezzini (IT–I) (Rule 62 – Mr Durante)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT-I)
Mr Pezzini (IT–I) (Rule 62 – Mr Mascia)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT-I) (Sandro MASCIA, člen 62)
Mr Pezzini (Rule 62  - Mr Nicoletti) (I-IT)
M. PEZZINI (NICOLETTI, člen 62) (I-IT)
Mr Pezzini (Rule 62 - Mascia) (IT – I)
PEZZINI (Mascia, člen 62) (IT – I)
Mr Pezzini (Rule 62 - Mascia) (IT-I)
Pezzini (Mascia - člen 62) (IT-I)
Mr Pezzini (Rule 62 Mascia) (IT – I)
PEZZINI (Mascia, člen 62) (IT – I)
Mr Pezzini concluded his presentation by calling for unanimous support for his document, so that a firm stance could be taken in respect of the Council.
PEZZINI je predstavitev končal s prošnjo po soglasnem sprejetju njegovega dokumenta, da bi Svetu dokazali trdno stališče.
Mr Pezzini Enzo (Rapporteur's expert)
Enzo PEZZINI (za poročevalko)
Mr Pezzini outlined the long historical background to the quaestors' proposal and Mr Hernandez Bataller and Ms Batut pointed out that the text codified a large number of existing practices.
Antonello PEZZINI je opozoril na zgodovinsko ozadje predloga kvestorjev, medtem ko sta Bernando HERNANDEZ BATALLER in Laure BATUT poudarila, da so v besedilu kodificirane številne obstoječe prakse.
Mr Pezzini presented the opinion, underlining that the issue was quite straightforward.
Pezzini je predstavil mnenje in poudaril, da je tema mnenja precej enostavna.
Mr Pezzini reminded that opinion is only about Turkey and further work might be needed with regard to other candidate countries.
Pezzini opozori, da se mnenje nanaša samo na Turčijo in da bo potrebno nadaljnje delo glede drugih držav kandidatk.
Mr Pezzini thanked Mr Frerichs for his work and commitment.
FRERICHSU zahvalil za njegovo delo in prizadevanje.
Mr Peña emphasised that the Spanish ESC was both a permanent platform for discussion and debate and a government advisory body for economic, social and employment related matters.
PEÑA je prav tako poudaril, da je španski ESS stalna platforma za razmislek in razprave ter posvetovalni organ vlade za ekonomsko-socialna vprašanja ter vprašanja glede zaposlovanja.
Mr Philippe (FR-Cat.2)
Marcel PHILIPPE (FR-2. kat.)
Mr Philippe (FR-Cat.2)
Marcel PHILIPPE (FR-kat.
Mr Philippe de Buck (BE-I)
Philippe DE BUCK (BE-I)
Mr Philippe Faveaux (for Group II)
Philippe FAVEAUX (za II. skupino)
Mr Philippe Mangin
Philippa MANGINA
Mr Philippe Marchandier (for the rapporteur)
Philippe MARCHANDIER (za poročevalca)
Mr Philippe Maystadt, President of the European Investment Bank,
Philippa MAYSTADTA, predsednika Evropske investicijske banke
Mr Philippe Maystadt, President of the European Investment Bank,
Philippa MAYSTADTA, predsednika Evropske investicijske banke,
Mr Pico LANTINI (for Group I)
Pico LANTINI (za I. skupino)
Mr Piebalgs' statement and the summary of the discussion that followed can be found in the document attached to these minutes (Appendix I).
PIEBALGSA in povzetek razprave, ki je sledila, sta povzeta v prilogi zapisnika (Priloga I).
Mr Pierre Bauby
(za poročevalca)
Mr Pierre Bauby
Pierre Bauby
Mr Pierre Bauby
Pierre BAUBY (strokovnjak soporočevalca g.
Mr Pierre Bauby (for Group II)
Pierre BAUBY (za II. skupino)
Mr Pierre Bauby (for the rapporteur)
Pierre BAUBY (za poročevalca)
Mr Pierre Jean Coulon
g. COULON
Mr Pierre Zembri (for the rapporteur)
Pierre ZEMBRI (za poročevalca)
Mr Pierre-Jean Coulon (FR-II)
Pierre-Jean COULON (FR-II)
Mr PIERUCCI
PIERUCCI
Mr Piet Battiau (for the rapporteur)
Piet BATTIAU (za poročevalca)
Mr Pietkiewicz (PL – I)
PIETKIEWICZ (PL – I)
Mr Pietkiewicz (PL-I)
Janusz PIETKIEWICZ (PL-I)
Mr Pietkiewicz (PL–I)
Janusz PIETKIEWICZ (PL-I)
Mr Pietro Gimondo (for Group II)
Pietro Gimondo (za II. skupino)
Mr PIETTE
g. PIETTE
Mr Piette had been a Committee member since 8 December 1992 and belonged to the sections for:
PIETTE je bil član EESO od 8. decembra 1992 in član strokovnih skupin za:
Mr Piette had been a Committee member since 8 December 1992 and belonged to the sections for:
PIETTE je član EESO od 8. decembra 1992 in je član naslednjih strokovnih skupin:
Mr Piette had been appointed Belgian Minister for Employment on 21 December 2007.
Josly PIETE je bil 21. decembra 2007 imenovan za ministra za delo v belgijski vladi.
Mr Piette presented the CCMI's activity report and suggestions for improving some the CCMI's working methods.
PIETTE je predstavil poročilo o dejavnostih CCMI in predloge za izboljšanje nekaterih načinov dela CCMI. Sledila je razprava, na kateri so sodelovali g.
Mr Piette stressed in particular that the proposal from the rapporteur could call into question the compromise reached at the time of the setting-up of this consultative commission, whose role was to perpetuate the experience acquired within the ECSC.
G. PIETTE je poudaril zlasti dejstvo, da bi lahko predlog poročevalca ogrozil kompromis, dosežen ob ustanovitvi omenjene posvetovalne komisije, katere poslanstvo je delovati na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih v okviru ESPJ.
Mr Pigal (FR-II)
Eric PIGAL (FR-II)
Mr Pilawski (PL-I) (Rule 62, Mr Krawczyk)
Lech PILAWSKI (člen 62) (PL-I)
Mr Pilawski (Rule 62 - Mr Krawczyk) (PL-I)
(Jacek KRAWCZYK, člen 62) (PL-I)
Mr Pilawski (Rule 62 – Ostrowski) (PL-I)
Lech PILAWSKI (Krzysztof OSTROWSKI, člen 62) (PL-I)
Mr Pinter (PL-I) (Rule 62 Stojan)
Michal PINTER (PL-I) (Dare STOJAN, člen 62)
Mr Pinto mentioned Civil Society Day, introduced in 2009, which spreads public awareness of the importance of the participatory element of democracy.
Diogo Pinto je nato govoril o dnevu civilne družbe, ki je bilo uvedeno leta 2009, omogoča pa ozaveščanje državljanov o pomenu participativne razsežnosti demokracije.
Mr Pinto wished to move away from a sterile debate between adherents of civil and social dialogue, underlining how these forms of dialogue can and should complement each other.
Pinto je izrazil pričakovanje, da bi prekinili brezplodno razpravo med pristaši civilnega oziroma socialnega dialoga, ter poudaril, da se oba lahko dopolnjujeta in se tudi morata dopolnjevati.
Mr Pinto, speaking on behalf of the Organised Civil Society Liaison Group, took the floor and stressed the importance of Article 11 of the Treaty.
Diogo PINTO je spregovoril v imenu povezovalne skupine za organizirano civilno družbo ter opozoril na izjemen pomen člena 11 Pogodbe.
Mr Pintér (I-SK)
Michal PINTÉR (SK – I)
Mr Pintér l (Cat.
Michal PINTÉR (SK-1. kat.)
Mr Pirvulescu (RO – III)
Cristian PÎRVULESCU (RO-III)
Mr Planas
Luis PLANAS
Mr Planas also provided clarification regarding the procedure proposed in the memo submitted to the Bureau.
Luis PLANAS je tudi pojasnil postopek, predlagan v obvestilu predsedstvu.
Mr Planas presented the preliminary draft agenda (EESC-2014-03492-04-00-NB-TRA – Pt C.1.b) for the session to the Bureau.
Luis PLANAS je predsedstvu predstavil predhodni predlog dnevnega reda zasedanja (EESC-2014-03492-04-00-NB-TRA – Pt C.1.b).
Mr Planas presented this memo to the Bureau.
Ta dokument je predsedstvu predstavil Luis PLANAS.
Mr Planas then explained the specific organisational changes proposed: new titles for directorates; a different combination of units within the directorates; and the creation of a limited number of "sectors", which would be administrative units subordinate to the units, and of ad hoc structures that were more flexible and better suited to potential needs in comparison to the existing ones ("project teams").
Luis PLANAS je nato opisal posamezne predlagane organizacijske spremembe: novo poimenovanje direkcij, drugačna razvrstitev enot znotraj teh, oblikovanje omejenega števila "oddelkov" kot upravnih enot, podrejenih večjim enotam, ter ad hoc struktur, ki bi bile v primerjavi z obstoječimi strukturami prožnejše in bolj prilagojene morebitnim potrebam ("projektne ekipe").