natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
He then briefly outlined the history of the Committee, from its "birth" in January 1958 to today's enlarged Europe, and stressed that it remained a "forum for European citizens", responsible for advising the European institutions (in particular the EP, Council and Commission), involving civil society organisations more in the European venture and supporting the establishment of bodies for dialogue with civil society organisations in non-EU countries or blocs.
Z nekaj besedami je spomnil na zgodovinsko pot Odbora od "rojstva" januarja 1958 do današnje razširjene Evrope, pri tem pa poudaril, je bil vedno "forum evropskih državljanov", katerega naloga je opravljati posvetovalno delo za evropske institucije (Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisijo), omogočati boljšo povezanost in okrepljeno sodelovanje organizirane civilne družbe v EU pri evropskem projektu ter spodbujati "v državah ali geografskih združbah izven skupnosti" ustanavljanje organov za dialog z organizirano civilno družbo.
He then briefly summarised the various parts of the document.
Zatem je na kratko povzel različne dele dokumenta.
He then called on the Committee to harness the potential opportunities provided by Article 11(3) in respect of the Commission's consultation policy and the EESC's role in that regard.
Med drugim je Odbor pozval k temu, da izkoristi možnosti, ki jih vsebuje 3. odstavek člena 11 v zvezi s politiko posvetovanja Komisije in vlogo Odbora v tem okviru.
He then called upon the Commission to approach the Member States actively and with conviction to achieve this.
Komisijo poziva, da v tem smislu dejavno in prepričljivo pristopi do držav članic.
He then commented on the outcome of the Irish referendum on the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty and the reactions of the EU institutions.
Predsednik je zatem komentiral rezultate referenduma na Irskem o ratifikaciji Lizbonske pogodbe ter odzive institucij EU.
He then considered the actions, including by the EESC, which could help to prevent and reduce the social distortions linked to the internationalisation of companies and movements of capital, and to strengthen the principles of law and social responsibility.
Nato je navedel ukrepe, tudi na ravni EESO, ki bi lahko prispevali k preprečevanju in zmanjšanju socialnih neravnovesij zaradi internacionalizacije podjetij in kapitalskih tokov ter h krepitvi pravnih načel in družbene odgovornosti.
He then decided to present the following compromise text that takes into account those concerns.
Zato je predstavil kompromisno besedilo, ki upošteva te pomisleke.
He then described the EEAS as a service, not an institution, comprising 3600 staff and dealing with foreign affairs, military issues and development cooperation all in one.
ESZD je opisal kot službo, ne institucijo, ki šteje 3600 uslužbencev in skupno obravnava zunanje zadeve, vojaška vprašanja in razvojno sodelovanje.
He then described the main changes and challenges facing the sector and referred members to the document, which contained a more detailed analysis.
Glavni poročevalec je nato opisal glavne spremembe in izzive, s katerimi se sooča ta sektor.
He then explained to the Assembly why the Bureau had decided at its meeting on 16 May 2006, to propose to the Assembly that work on this opinion be closed.
Nato je skupščini pojasnil, zakaj je predsedstvo na seji 16. maja 2006 sklenilo skupščini predlagati ustavitev postopka priprave tega mnenja.
He then expressed his strong concern regarding a Dutch party's decision to disseminate xenophobic, racist and discriminatory comments on an internet site.
Izrazil je tudi osuplost nad pobudo nizozemske stranke za razširjanje ksenofobnih, rasističnih in diskriminacijskih vsebin prek spletne strani.
He then focussed on the fact that it is difficult to define objective criteria for assessing animal welfare.
Zatem se je osredotočil na težavnost določanja objektivnih meril za ugotavljanje dobrega počutja živali.
He then gave a brief summary of the different sections of the document.
Zatem je na kratko povzel različne odstavke dokumenta.
He then gave a report of his most recent key activities, related in essence to promoting the Committee and its work outside Brussels, and thanked the members who had accompanied him on missions and helped him to prepare for them.
Nato je poročal o svojih najnovejših glavnih dejavnostih, predvsem glede promocije Odbora in dela zunaj Bruslja, in se zahvalil članom, ki so ga spremljali na njegovih misijah ali so mu jih pomagali pripraviti.
He then gave a summary of numerous changes that had taken place in the Committee over the last year, presenting the main achievements of EESC president, Mr Staffan Nilsson, whose term had come to an end in April; he also presented the main points on the agenda of the new EESC president, Mr Henri Malosse.
Nato je naštel številne spremembe, do katerih je lansko leto prišlo v Odboru, predstavil glavne dosežke predsednika EESO Staffana Nilssona, katerega mandat se je končal aprila, ter predstavil tudi glavne točke strategije novega predsednika EESO Henrija Malossa.
He then gave some explanations about the amendments proposed to Rules 43 J and 61 E of the Implementing Provisions.
Poročevalec je nato pojasnil predlagane spremembe členov 43 J in 61 E izvedbenih določb.
He then gave the floor to Mr Adamczyk.
Nato je besedo predal Andrzeju Adamczyku.
He then gave the floor to Mr Dassis, and asked him to present to the Bureau the salient points of the future financial statute and the draft implementing rules, as drawn up by the ad hoc group set up by the Bureau.
DASSISU in ga povabil, da predsedstvu predstavi najpomembnejše točke prihodnjih finančnih pravil za člane in osnutek pravilnika o izvajanju finančnih pravil, ki ga je pripravila ad hoc skupina, ki jo je ustanovilo predsedstvo.
He then gave the floor to Mr László Surján, Vice-President of the European Parliament.
Nato je besedo predal Lászlu SURJÁNU, podpredsedniku Evropskega parlamenta.
He then gave the floor to Mr Vidan, who thanked the Assembly for accepting the initiative proposed by the Croatian members and said that the situation was very difficult in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Croatia, and that solidarity with civil society was necessary.
Besedo je nato predal Toniju Vidanu, ki se je skupščini zahvalil za sprejetje pobude hrvaških članov, nato pa povedal, da so razmere v Bosni in Hercegovini, Srbiji in na Hrvaškem zelo težke in da je bila solidarnost s civilno družbo nujna.
He then gave the floor to Mr Wilms and the secretary-general, allowing them to explain some of the elements contained in the final agreement, which was reached at the quadripartite meeting on 16 June 2015 and should be signed in the coming weeks.,
Nato je besedo predal g. WILMSU in generalnemu sekretarju, da bi podala nekaj informacij o vsebini končnega sporazuma, ki je bil sklenjen na štiristranskem sestanku 16. junija 2015 in ki naj bi ga podpisali v naslednjih tednih.
He then informed members about the follow-up to the negotiations since the last Bureau meeting, the meeting of the enlarged presidency, and the various meetings with his EP and CoR counterparts.
Poročal je o nadaljevanju pogajanj od zadnje seje predsedstva, o seji razširjenega ožjega predsedstva in različnih sejah s sogovorniki iz EP in OR.
He then informed members of the proposal put to the Brazilian government and the European Commission for an EU-Brazil round table.
Nato je zbrane seznanil s predlogom brazilski vladi in Evropski komisiji, da se organizira okrogla miza  EU-Brazilija.
He then informed the Assembly that the following members had resigned.
Nato je skupščino obvestil o odstopu naslednjih članov:
He then informed the Assembly that the following members had resigned:
Nato je skupščino seznanil z odstopom naslednjih članov:
He then informed the Bureau that another member, Mr Opran, had made a similar choice.
Nato je predsedstvo obvestil, da je svojo prošnjo enako podal tudi član Marius Eugen OPRAN.
He then installed the following members:
Predsednik je prešel na imenovanje članov:
He then invited the three group presidents to take the floor.
Nato je predsednike treh skupin povabil k besedi.
He then listed a number of economic indicators, such as the rate of economic growth (8%) and the increase in the minimum wage (13%), which demonstrated the improvement in Ukraine's socio-economic standard.
Nato je naštel nekaj ekonomskih kazalnikov, kot sta stopnja gospodarske rasti (8 %) in povečanje minimalnih plač (13 %), ki kažejo, da se socialno-ekonomski položaj v Ukrajini izboljšuje.
He then listed the main decisions taken at the bureau meeting, which were as follows:
Omenil je najpomembnejše odločitve, sprejete na seji predsedstva, in sicer
He then made a number of proposals, including drawing up a comparison with the human resources situation a few years ago following the creation of an ad hoc HR directorate, and drafting an action plan to implement the measures requested by Bureau members.
Nadaljeval je z nekaj predlogi, vključno s predlogom za pripravo primerjave s stanjem na kadrovskem področju pred nekaj leti, po ustanovitvi ad hoc direkcije za kadrovske zadeve, in predlogom za pripravo akcijskega načrta za izvedbo ukrepov, ki so jih zahtevali člani predsedstva.
He then made a statement, following the comments made at the last meeting of the enlarged presidency and concerning his work as Committee president.
Nato je na podlagi pripomb z zadnje seje razširjenega ožjega predsedstva v zvezi z njegovim delom kot predsednikom Odbora podal izjavo.
He then mentioned the conference Immigration -  A source of wealth and duties for Europe, held on 15 March and organised jointly by the EESC, the French ESC and the Council of Europe.
Konferenco, na kateri so bili zlasti poudarjeni humanitarni vidiki, je EESO organiziral skupaj s francoskim ekonomsko-socialnim svetom in Svetom Evrope.
He then mentioned the translation problems concerning REX 239 (Relations between the European Union and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: the role of civil society (own-initiative opinion)), adopted by the Assembly at the March 2008 plenary session, and explained the that Bureau had decided to suggest to the Assembly that it confirmed the approach taken by the REX section bureau, i.e. to consider the Greek version as the authentic version.
Zatem je spregovoril o težavah, povezanih s prevodom mnenja REX 239 (Odnosi med Evropsko unijo in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo: vloga civilne družbe – mnenje na lastno pobudo), ki je bilo sprejeto na plenarnem zasedanju marca 2008, in pojasnil, da je predsedstvo sklenilo, da bo skupščini predlagalo, naj potrdi sklep predsedstva strokovne skupine REX, da velja grška različica za pravo in da bodo ostale jezikovne različice ustrezno popravljene.
He then moved on to the Rio +20 conference on sustainable development, which the United Nations was organising on 21 and 22 June and to which the EESC would be sending a delegation.
Zatem je omenil konferenco Rio+20 o trajnostnem razvoju, ki jo 21. in 22. junija letos organizirajo Združeni narodi in na katero bo EESO poslal delegacijo.
He then noted the improvements that would need to be made with regard to the structure and presentation of the documents produced by the Committee and its external image, more generally.
Nato je govoril o potrebnih izboljšavah strukture in videza dokumentov, ki jih pripravlja Odbor, ter o zunanji podobi institucije na splošno.
He then opened the discussion, inviting an initial round of comments on the EESC president's address.
Nato je odprl razpravo za prvi del komentarjev na govor predsednika Odbora.
He then opened the general discussion.
Nato je začel splošno razpravo.
He then outlined the general guidelines underlying the reflection and consultation initiated by the Commission with regard to the EU budget, with a view to achieving a more effective correlation between the allocation of resources and future objectives.
Nato je omenil splošne smernice za razmislek, ki izhajajo iz posvetovanja Evropske komisije o proračunu Unije, katerega cilj je dodeljevanje sredstev bolje uskladiti s prihodnjimi cilji.
He then passed on to mention the State of the Union speech delivered the previous week by the European Commission's President Jean-Claude Juncker, which he had read attentively.
Predsednik Dassis je dejal, da je pozorno prebral govor o stanju v Uniji, ki ga je imel predsednik Evropske komisije Jean-Claude Juncker prejšnji teden.
He then pointed out that an audit group had been instructed to give an opinion on the possibility of increasing the share of the EESC's budget allocated to the reimbursement of members' expenses.
Poudaril je, da je bila skupina za revizijo zadolžena, da poda mnenje o možnosti povečanja dela sredstev EESO, ki so namenjena povračilu stroškov članom.
He then presented an overview of the opinion's structure and key recommendations.
Nato je predstavil strukturo mnenja in glavna priporočila.
He then presented briefly the opinion stressing the general economic context.
Nato je na kratko predstavil mnenje, pri čemer je poudaril splošni gospodarski okvir.
He then presented the 2014 draft budget which amounted to EUR 132 291 000, representing an increase of 1.68%.
KRAWCZYK je nato predstavil proračun za leto 2014, ki znaša 132.291.000 EUR in je večji za 1,68 %.
He then presented the AFM accounts, including the total of EUR 37 077.43 for expenses (EESC contribution: EUR 30 000.00; the amount collected from members in the form of membership contributions in 2012 totalled EUR 4 310.00; carried over from 2011: EUR 9 191.85).
Nato je predstavil računovodske izkaze združenja, vključno s skupnimi izdatki v višini 37 077,43 EUR (prispevek EESO: 30 000,00 EUR, zbrane članarine za leto 2012: 4 310,00 EUR, prenos iz leta 2011: 9 191,85 EUR).
He then presented the main points, stressing that the Committee cannot agree with the "wait-and-see" approach of the Commission, notably in light of concrete developments in certain Member States.
Nato je predstavil glavne točke in poudaril, da se Odbor ne more strinjati s pristopom "čakanja na nadaljnji razvoj", ki ga predlaga Komisija, zlasti ob upoštevanju konkretnega dogajanja v nekaterih državah članicah.
He then presented the opinion and stressed that the external policy of the EU should be an absolute priority among other policies.
Nato je mnenje predstavil in opozoril, da bi morala imeti zunanja politika EU absolutno prednost pred drugimi politikami.
He then presented the opinion.
Nato je mnenje predstavil.
He then presented the report and underlined that sustainable growth had to be linked to social development.
Poročevalec je nato predstavil poročilo in poudaril, da je treba trajnostno rast vezati na socialni razvoj.
He then presented the revised proposals for amending the Rules of Procedure (F/CESE 4736/2009), which he had drawn up with technical assistance from the secretariat, taking into account suggestions that the members had submitted to him since the last meeting.
Zatem je predstavil revidirane predloge sprememb poslovnika (dokument F/CESE 4736/2009), ki jih je pripravil s tehnično pomočjo sekretariata, pri tem pa je upošteval predloge članov, ki so mu jih poslali od zadnje seje.
He then presented this draft opinion, stressing that it welcomes the European Commission's proposal for a CC Action Plan in Europe, but also proposes important additional and complementary actions that would need to be taken in order to develop a truly "CC-active" (as is VP Kroes's ambition) and, as much as possible, a "CC-productive" Europe (an even more ambitious goal) to ensure strategic independence, self‑sufficiency and job creation vis-à-vis the growing international competition in this domain.
Nato je predstavil osnutek mnenja, pri čemer je poudaril, da pozdravlja predlog Evropske komisije za akcijski načrt na področju računalništva v oblaku v Evropi, a tudi predlagal pomembne spremljevalne in dopolnilne ukrepe, ki bi jih bilo treba izvesti, če naj Evropa postane resnično aktivna (prizadevanja podpredsednice Kroes) in kar najbolj produktivna (še ambicioznejši cilj) na področju računalništva v oblaku, s čimer bi si kljub vse močnejši mednarodni konkurenci zagotovila neodvisnost, samozadostnost in nova delovna mesta.
He then raised the issue of the financial difficulties connected to the INTERREG III B programme (Community initiative of the European Fund for Regional Development promoting cooperation between EU regions).
HAKEN postavil vprašanje o finančnih težavah v zvezi s programom INTERREG III B (Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj, pobuda Skupnosti za sodelovanje med regijami Evropske unije)
He then read aloud a proposal for a compromise on the rules on the power to appoint staff members of group secretariats, requesting that the secretariat's legal service check that the proposed change complied with legal requirements.
Nato je prebral predlog kompromisa glede pravil o pristojnostih za imenovanje osebja v tajništvih skupin, hkrati pa pozval pravno službo sekretariata, naj preveri skladnost predlagane spremembe s formalnega vidika.
He then read the last two paragraphs of his statement of 11 February on the subject, the full text of which can be found on the Committee's website (http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/cp-17-2011-en-statement-of-the-president.doc):
Predsednik je nato prebral prva dva odstavka iz svoje izjave na to temo z dne 11. februarja, katere celotno besedilo je na voljo na spletni strani Odbora (http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/cp-17-2011-en-statement-of-the-president.doc):
He then recalled the background to the opinion, in particular the many questions about the future of the European project and the aims of the European integration process.
Nato je opozoril na ozadje mnenja in zlasti na mnoga vprašanja o prihodnosti evropskega projekta in cilju procesa evropskega povezovanja.
He then referred to the establishment of an African institute for sustainable development to monitor action taken on meeting the Millennium Goals.
Omenil je tudi ustanovitev afriškega inštituta za trajnostni razvoj, ki bo omogočil nadaljevanje uresničitve ciljev tisočletja.
He then referred to the list of guests at the next plenary session in January 2015, and mentioned the presence of Ms Kalniņa-Lukaševica, Parliamentary Secretary at the Latvian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Latvian civil society representatives and Ms Vike-Freiberga, former president of the Republic of Latvia.
Nato je omenil seznam povabljenih gostov na naslednje plenarno zasedanje januarja 2015, ki se ga bodo udeležili Zanda KALNIŅA-LUKAŠEVICA, parlamentarna državna sekretarka na latvijskem ministrstvu za zunanje zadeve, predstavniki latvijske civilne družbe in Vaira VIKE-FREIBERGA, nekdanja predsednica Republike Latvije.
He then referred to the meeting between an EESC delegation and representatives of the Moroccan ESC which reflected the positive political developments the country was currently experiencing.
Nato je omenil srečanje delegacije EESO s predstavniki maroškega ESS, ki je eden od dogodkov v okviru pozitivnih političnih sprememb, ki trenutno potekajo v Maroku.
He then referred to the new developments that might be possible in the area of participatory democracy, noting that the links between the Committee's groups and civil society organisations could be brought into play in this regard.
Nato je spregovoril o možnem razvoju na področju participativne demokracije, pri katerem bi lahko izkoristili stike, ki jih imajo skupine Odbora z organizacijami civilne družbe.
He then referred to the success of the conference on food safety, held at the Committee on 23 May 2011, and stressed the quality of the contributions of speakers and the widespread interest that this event had generated.
Nato je spomnil na uspeh konference o varnosti živilskih izdelkov, ki je bila 23. maja 2011 na sedežu Odbora, in izpostavil kakovost prispevkov govornikov in širok odziv, ki ga je izzval ta dogodek.
He then referred to the suspension of air travel caused by the eruption of the Icelandic volcano and the decision to reimburse Members who, having already booked their tickets, were prevented from travelling.
Omenil je ustavitev letalskega prometa zaradi izbruha islandskega vulkana in sprejem odločitve za povračilo stroškov članom, ki niso mogli na pot in so vozovnice pred tem že rezervirali.
He then remarked that the EESC wanted its members to benefit from their experience at the Committee, with knock-on effects based on their knowledge, expertise and contacts, and to continue to cooperate and share their experiences even after their term-in-office came to an end.
Nato je dejal, da EESO želi, da bi izkušnje z delom v Odboru članom koristile, saj lahko močno vplivajo na njihovo splošno in strokovno znanje ter stike, ter da bi tudi po koncu svojega mandata sodelovali in si izmenjevali izkušnje.
He then reminded the audience of the three themes he had chosen to spotlight when he was elected president: dialogue and participation, sustainability and growth, solidarity and development, together with the overarching motto for his presidency: "Engaging people for a sustainable Europe".
Poslušalce je nato opozoril na tri teme, ki jim je sklenil ob izvolitvi za predsednika posvetiti posebno pozornost – dialog in sodelovanje, trajnost in rast ter solidarnost in razvoj, medtem ko si je za svoje predsedovanje izbral geslo "S skupnimi močmi za trajnostno Evropo".
He then reported that he had met two Turkish delegations - one from the Foreign Economic Relations Board of Turkey, and another from the Turkey Democracy Platform - to hold an exchange of views on the current economic and socio-political situation in Turkey following the abortive coup attempt.
Nato je člane obvestil o sestankih z dvema turškima delegacijama – delegacijo turškega Sveta za zunanje gospodarske odnose in delegacijo platforme za demokracijo v Turčiji – namenjenih izmenjavi stališč o gospodarskih in družbenopolitičnih razmerah v Turčiji po spodletelem poskusu državnega udara.
He then responded to the various questions raised by Bureau members at the previous meeting concerning the breakdown of staff and the efforts being made to improve the balance in terms of distribution by grade, age, gender and geographical origin.
Nato je odgovoril na različna vprašanja, ki so jih člani predsedstva izpostavili na prejšnji seji, glede strukture osebja in prizadevanj za doseganje večjega ravnovesja pri razporeditvi po plačnih razredih, starosti, spolu in geografskem poreklu.
He then said that he completely disagreed with the very negative wording of the second part of point 2.2, according to which getting civil society involved in the activities of the EU presidency would, for some governments, "only disrupt things".
Nato je izrazil popolno nestrinjanje z negativno obarvanim besedilom drugega dela točke 2.2, ki pravi, da nekatere vlade menijo, da bi sodelovanje in vključevanje civilne družbe v dejavnosti predsedstva EU obremenitev "le še povečalo".
He then said that he was disappointed by the turn-out for the elections to the European Parliament which he ascribed, amongst other things, to the fact that Community issues hardly figured at all during the electoral campaigns.
Predsednik je nato izrazil svoje razočaranje nad nizko udeležbo na zadnjih volitvah v Evropski parlament, ki jo je med drugim pripisal dejstvu, da med volilno kampanjo problematika Skupnosti skoraj ni bila omenjena.
He then said that point 3 on the current situation should be expanded in order to highlight a number of good practices that would be worth pursuing in the future.
Nato je menil, da bi bilo treba točko 3, ki govori o trenutnih dejavnostih, razširiti, da bi lahko osvetlili nekatere dobre prakse, ki bi jih bilo v prihodnje vredno upoštevati.
He then spoke about his memories of two moments he had shared with the former president:
Še zlasti sta mu ostala v spominu dva dogodka v zvezi z nekdanjim predsednikom:
He then spoke about the difficulties caused by Mr Serra Arias's informally-voiced choice to join Group I, when Group III had already nominated him for various positions.
Nato je izpostavil problematično in neformalno izraženo odločitev Ricarda SERRE ARIASA, da se pridruži I. skupini, čeprav ga je pred tem za opravljanje nekaterih funkcij že imenovala III. skupina.