natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 479th plenary session of 28 and 29 March 2012 (meeting of 28 March 2012), by 158 votes to 2 with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 479. plenarnem zasedanju 28. in 29. marca 2012 (seja z dne 28. marca) s 158 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 479th plenary session of 28 and 29 March 2012 (meeting of 28 March 2012), by 158 votes to 2 with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 479. plenarnem zasedanju 28. in 29. marca 2012 (seja z dne 28. marca 2012) s 158 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 479th plenary session of 28 and 29 March 2012 (meeting of 28 March 2012), by … votes to … with … abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 479. plenarnem zasedanju 28. in 29. marca 2012 (seja z dne 28. marca) s/z … glasovi za, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 481st plenary session of 23 and 24 May 2012 (meeting of 23 May 2012), by 149 votes to 5 with 11 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 481. plenarnem zasedanju 23. in 24. maja 2012 (seja z dne 23. maja) s 149 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 481st plenary session of 23 and 24 May 2012 (meeting of 23 May 2012), by 154 votes to 1 with 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 481. plenarnem zasedanju 23. in 24. maja 2012 (seja z dne 23. maja) s 154 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 481st plenary session of 23 and 24 May 2012 (meeting of 23 May 2012), by 159 votes to 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 481. plenarnem zasedanju 23. in 24. maja 2012 (seja z dne 23. maja) s 159 glasovi za in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 481st plenary session of 23 and 24 May 2012 (meeting of 23 May 2012), by 159 votes with 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 481. plenarnem zasedanju 23. in 24. maja 2012 (seja z dne 23. maja) s 159 glasovi za in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 481st plenary session of 23 and 24 May 2012 (meeting of 23 May 2012), by … votes to … with … abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 481. plenarnem zasedanju 23. in 24. maja 2012 (seja z dne 23. maja) s/z … glasovi za, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September 2012), by 141 votes to none, with 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 483. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. septembra 2012 (seja z dne 18. septembra) s 141 glasovi za in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September 2012), by 142 votes to 3 with 8 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 483. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. septembra 2012 (seja z dne 18. septembra) s 142 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September), by 145 votes to 3 with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 483. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. septembra 2012 (seja z dne 18. septembra) s 145 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September 2012), by 148 votes to 5 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 483. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. septembra 2012 (seja z dne 18. septembra) s 148 glasovi za, petimi glasovi proti in šestimi vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 140 votes with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 140 glasovi za in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 150 votes to 1 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 150 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 150 votes with 8 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 150 glasovi za, nobenim glasom proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 156 votes to 3 with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 156 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 61 votes to 9 with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) z 61 glasovi za, 9 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 61votes to 9 with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) z 61 glasovi za, 9 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by … votes to … with … abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s/z … glasovi za, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November), by 143 votes to 3 with 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 143 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November), by 149 votes to 3 with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 149 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December 2012), by 124 votes with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 485. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2012 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 124 glasovi za in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December), by 127 votes to 2 with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 485. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2012 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 127 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December), by 129 votes with 1 abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 485. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2012 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 129 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December), by 137 votes with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 485. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2012 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 137 glasovi za in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion1, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the present opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem mnenju1, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in its earlier opinion1, adopted on 29 November 2000, the Committee decided, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju1, sprejetem 29. novembra 2000, zato je sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja isto stališče kot v zgoraj navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in its earlier opinions, adopted on 7 July 1999* and on 9 March 2005**, the Committee decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v prejšnjih mnenjih, sprejetih 7. julija 1999* in 9. marca 2005**, zato je sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja isto stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in opinion CESE 1022/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009*, it decided at its … plenary session, held on …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1022/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in opinion CESE 1025/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009*, it decided at its … plenary session, held on …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1025/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in opinion CESE 1031/2013 – 2012/0364 (COD), adopted on 20 March 20131, it decided at its …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1031/2013 – 2012/0364 (COD), sprejetem 20. marca 20131, zato je na
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in its opinion CESE 493/2008, adopted on 12 March 2008*, it decided, at its 489th plenary session of 17 and 18 April 2013 (meeting of 17 April 2013), by 178 votes to 3 with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion referring to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 493/2008, sprejetem 12. marca 2008*, zato je na 489. plenarnem zasedanju 17. in 18. aprila 2013 (seja z dne 17. aprila) s 178 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil pripraviti mnenje, v katerem bo zgolj opozoril na stališče, izraženo v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CES-6207-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 16 October 2013*, it decided, at its 497th plenary session of 25 and 26 March 2014 (meeting of 25 March), by 127 votes to 7 with 13 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES6207-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 16. oktobra 2013*, zato je na 497. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. marca 2014 (seja z dne 25. marca) s 127 glasovi za, 7 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 22 May 2013, it decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je v mnenju CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 22. maja 2013, že izrazil svoje stališče o vsebini predloga, zato je sklenil, da ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 1573/2012, adopted on 12 July 2012*, it decided, at its 490th plenary session of 22 and 23 May 2013 (meeting of 22 May), by 161 votes to two with five abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1573/2012, sprejetem 12. julija 2012*, zato je na 490. plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. maja 2013 (seja z dne 22. maja) s 161 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 1573/2012, adopted on 12 July 2012*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1573/2012, sprejetem 12. julija 2012*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 1573/2012, adopted on 12 July 2012, it decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1573/2012, sprejetem 12. julija 2012, zato je sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 493/2008, adopted on 12 March 2008*, it decided, at its 489th plenary session of 17 and 18 April 2013 (meeting of 17 April 2013), by 178 votes to 3 with 10 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 493/2008, sprejetem 12. marca 2008*, zato je na 489. plenarnem zasedanju 17. in 18. aprila 2013 (seja z dne 17. aprila) s 178 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 493/2008, adopted on 12 March 2008, it decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 493/2008, sprejetem 12. marca 2008, zato je sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES 4014-2013_00_00_AC, adopted on 16 October 2013* and CES 1334/88 adopted on 14 December 1988**, it decided, at its 497th plenary session of 25 and 26 March 2014 (meeting of 25 March), by 135 votes to 3 with 17 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES4014-2013_00_00_AC, sprejetem 16. oktobra 2013*, in mnenju CES 1334/88, sprejetem 14. decembra 1988**, zato je na 497. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. marca 2014 (seja z dne 25. marca) s 135 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 17 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES 4014/2013, adopted on 16 October 2013* and CES 1334/88 adopted on 14 December 1988**, it decided, at its 497th plenary session of 25 and 26 March 2014 (meeting of 25 March), by … votes to … with … abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES 4014/2013, sprejetem 16. oktobra 2013*, in mnenju CES 1334/88, sprejetem 14. decembra 1988**, zato je na 497. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. marca 2014 (seja z dne 25. marca) s/z ... glasovi za, ... glasovi proti in ... vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES2108-2012_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 13 February 2013* and CES3961-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 18 September 2013**, it decided, at its 508th plenary session of 27 and 28 May 2015 (meeting of 27 May), by …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES2108-2012_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 13. februarja 2013*, in mnenju CES3961-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 18. septembra 2013**, zato je na 508. plenarnem zasedanju 27. in 28. maja 2015 (seja z dne 27. maja) s/z ...
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 22 May 2013* and EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, adopted on 5 June 2014**, it decided, at its 507th plenary session of 22 and 23 April 2015 (meeting of 22 April), by …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 22. maja 2013*, in mnenju EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, sprejetem 5. junija 2014**, zato je na 507. plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. aprila 2015 (seja z dne 22. aprila) s/z ...
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 22 May 2013*, EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, adopted on 5 June 2014** and EESC-2015-02052-00-00-AC-TRA, adopted on 22 April 2016***, it decided, at its 517th plenary session of 25 and 26 May 2016 (meeting of 25 May), by …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 22. maja 2013*, mnenju EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, sprejetem 4. junija 2014**, in mnenju EESC-2015-02052-00-00-AC-TRA, sprejetem 22. aprila 2015***, zato je na 517. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. maja 2016 (seja z dne 25. maja) s/z
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 22 May 2013, EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, adopted on 5 June 2014 and EESC-2015-02052-00-00-AC-TRA, adopted on 22 April 2016, it decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 22. maja 2013, mnenju EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, sprejetem 5. junija 2014, in mnenju EESC-2015-02052-00-00-AC-TRA, sprejetem 22. aprila 2016, zato je sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES4014-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 16 October 2013* and CES 1331/88, adopted on 14 December 1988**, it decided, at its 497th plenary session of 25 and 26 March 2014 (meeting of 25 March), by 139 votes to 3 with 17 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES4014-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 16. oktobra 2013*, in mnenju CES 1331/88, sprejetem 14. decembra 1988**, zato je na 497. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. marca 2014 (seja z dne 25. marca) s 139 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 17 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.