natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court also ordered that the effects of the annulment be suspended until the adoption, within a reasonable time, of a new regulation.
Sodišče je tudi zadržalo učinke razveljavitve, dokler se ne sprejme nova uredba, če se ta sprejme v razumnem času.
The Court also pointed out shortcomings regarding the selection and targeting of projects, as well as insufficient evaluation of their results.
Sodišče opozarja tudi na vrzeli pri izboru in namembnosti projektov ter na pomanjkljivo ocenjevanje njihovih rezultatov.
The Court also rejected the appellants’ plea that the tax measures were excluded from the scope of the rules on state aid as they were introduced before the Ecofin Council meeting on 1 December 1997 and the Commission notice of 10 December 1998 on the application of state aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation.
Sodišče je tudi zavrnilo ugovor pritožnikov, da so davčni ukrepi izključeni iz področja pravil o državni pomoči, saj so bili uvedeni pred sestankom Ekonomsko-finančnega sveta dne 1. decembra 1997 in obvestilom Komisije z dne 10. decembra 1998 o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za ukrepe, ki zadevajo neposredno obdavčitev ustvarjenega dohodka.
The Court also ruled that daily allowances constituting a compensation for being sent away from home must also be paid to posted workers to the same extent as it is paid to local workers in a similar situation.
Sodišče je tudi razsodilo, da je treba dnevnice, ki predstavljajo nadomestilo v primerih, ko se delavce pošlje od doma, tako kot lokalnim delavcem v podobnem položaju v enaki meri izplačati tudi napotenim delavcem.
The court before which proceedings are pending under Article 4, 5 or 6 shall also be competent to examine the counterclaim where this falls within the scope of this Regulation.
Sodišče, pristojno za odločanje na podlagi členov 4, 5 ali 6, je pristojno tudi za odločanje o nasprotnem zahtevku, če ta spada na področje uporabe te uredbe.
The Court can thus censure mere references to Community law masquerading as transposition2.
Sodišče zato splošnega sklicevanja na pravo Skupnosti ne sprejema kot prenos2.
The Court clarified more recently in judgments of 11th December 1997 in case C-246/96, Magorrian, and of 16th May 2000 in case C-78/98 Preston, its caselaw concerning the situation of part-time workers.
Sodišče je v novejših sodbah z dne 11. decembra 1997 v zadevi C-246/96, Magorrian, in z dne 16. maja 2000 v zadevi C-78/98, Preston, razjasnilo sodno prakso glede položaja zaposlenih s skrajšanim delovnim časom.
The Court clearly considers that capital formation of this type is excluded from the scope of ex-Article 119 (point 33 in the grounds for the Neath judgement).
Mnenje Sodišča je, da tak način akumulacije kapitala ne spada na področje uporabe prejšnega člena 119 (točka 33 sodbe Neath).
The Court concluded that from 21 December 2012, the unisex rule had to apply without derogation in relation to the calculation of individuals' premiums and benefits in new contracts.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je treba določbo o enakih pogojih za oba spola od 21. decembra 2012 uporabljati brez izjem v zvezi z izračunavanjem premij in dajatev oseb v novih pogodbah.
The Court concluded that the EFF had not supported the sustainable development of aquaculture effectively.
V njej je ugotovilo, da ESR ni učinkovito podprl trajnostnega razvoja akvakulture.
The Court concluded there too that the freedom of capital movements was violated.
Sodišče je tudi v tem primeru razsodilo, da gre za kršitev svobodnega gibanja kapitala.
The Court concludes that the Commission lacked the competence to adopt the decision as the parties, by letter of 27 June, had abandoned the agreement and not only withdrawn the notification.
Končno mnenje Sodišča je, da Komisija ni imela pristojnosti za sprejetje odločbe, saj sta stranki z dopisom z dne 27. junija odstopili od sporazuma in nista le preklicali priglasitve.
The Court confirmed that a person has the right to be informed of the basis for a decision to refuse entry, as the protection of national security cannot deny the right to a fair hearing, rendering the right to redress ineffective (Article 47).
Sodišče je potrdilo, da ima oseba pravico do obveščenosti o podlagi za odločbo o zavrnitvi vstopa, saj zaradi zaščite nacionalne varnosti ni mogoče odreči pravice do poštene obravnave, kar onemogoči uveljavljanje pravice do pravnega sredstva (člen 47).
The Court confirmed that from the point of view of public access to documents, the Commission could treat the entire content of its administrative file as belonging to a single category of documents during the investigation phase of the infringement procedure (including EU Pilot).
Sodišče je potrdilo, da bi lahko Komisija z vidika dostopa javnosti do dokumentov celotno vsebino svojega upravnega spisa obravnavala kot eno kategorijo dokumentov v fazi preiskave postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev (vključno s sistemom EU Pilot).
The Court confirmed that it remains open to the host Member State to take the view that a person who has recourse to social assistance no longer fulfils the conditions of the right of residence.
Sodišče je potrdilo, da država članica gostiteljica sama ugotovi, da oseba, ki je zaprosila za socialno pomoč, ne izpolnjuje več pogojev za pravico do prebivanja.
The Court confirmed that Member States may adopt measures to defend and promote one or several official languages as part of their cultural policy.
Sodišče je potrdilo, da lahko države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, s katerimi varujejo in podpirajo enega ali več uradnih jezikov kot del svoje kulturne politike.
The Court confirmed that the MIFs constituted a restriction of competition, in breach of EU antitrust rules.
Potrdilo je, da so večstranske medbančne provizije pomenile omejitev konkurence, kar je v nasprotju s protimonopolnimi pravili EU.
The Court confirmed that the scope of the Race Equality Directive cannot be defined restrictively.
Sodišče je potrdilo, da področja uporabe direktive o rasni enakosti ni mogoče opredeliti ozko.
The Court confirmed what it implicitly said in its judgment of 25 May 1971 in Case C-80/70 Defrenne I32 i.e. benefits granted under a pension scheme, which essentially relates to the employment of the person concerned, form part of the pay received by that person and come within the scope of ex-Article 119 of the EC Treaty.33
Sodišče je potrdilo to, kar je implicitno dejalo v sodbi z dne 25. maja 1971 v zadevi C-80/70, Defrenne I32 tj., da so prejemki iz pokojninskega sistema, ki se v bistvu nanaša na zaposlitev zadevne osebe, del plačila, ki ga ta oseba prejme, in spadajo na področje uporabe prejšnjega člena 119 Pogodbe ES.33
The Court considered how impossible it would be from a practical perspective for broadcasters to show such advertising only during the intervals between the different parts of the television programme concerned.
Zato je Sodišče upoštevalo, da je za izdajatelje televizijskih programov praktično nemogoče, da bi ta oglas predvajali samo v intervalih med posameznimi deli zadevnega televizijskega programa.
The Court considered indeed that the obligation to inform customers, on request, of the exact quantitative composition of compound feedingstuffs could not be justified by the objective of protecting public health which was being pursued and manifestly went beyond what is necessary to attain that objective4.
Sodišče je menilo, da obveznosti obvestiti stranke o točni količinski sestavi krmnih mešanic na njihovo zahtevo ni mogoče upravičiti s ciljem varovanja javnega zdravja, ki je bil uveljavljan in je očitno presegel to, kar je potrebno za njegovo doseganje4.
The Court considered that by enabling Member States to maintain without temporal limitation an exemption from the unisex rule laid down in Article 5(1), Article 5(2) runs counter to achievement of the objective of equal treatment between men and women in relation to the calculation of insurance premiums and benefits, which is the purpose of the Directive in the insurance field.
Menilo je, da je namen člena 5(2), ki omogoča državam članicam časovno neomejeno ohranitev izjeme od določbe o enakih pogojih za oba spola iz člena 5(1), v nasprotju z doseganjem cilja enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri izračunavanju premij in dajatev, kar je namen Direktive v skladu z določbami zakonodajalca na področju zavarovanja.
The Court considered that this legal basis was appropriate since the examination of the content of the provisions of Directive 2011/82/EU confirmed that the system for the exchange of information between the competent authorities of the Member States set up by that Directive provided the means of pursuing the objective of improving road safety and enabled the European Union to attain that aim.
Sodišče je menilo, da je ta pravna podlaga ustrezna, saj je proučitev vsebine določb Direktive 2011/82/EU potrdila, da sistem za izmenjavo informacij med pristojnimi organi držav članic, vzpostavljen z navedeno direktivo, zagotavlja sredstva za uresničevanje cilja, da se izboljša varnost v cestnem prometu, in omogoča Evropski uniji doseganje tega cilja.
The Court considers that the parties’ statement of 27 June 2000 could only be interpreted as entailing the lapsing of the merger agreement notified under the Merger Regulation.
Po mnenju Sodišča je izjavo strank z dne 27. junija 2000 mogoče razlagati v smislu, da ima za posledico prenehanje sporazuma o združitvi, priglašenega v skladu z uredbo o združitvi.
The Court decided in the Eckelkamp case that it is illegal for a Member State not to allow mortgage-related charges to be deducted from the value of property only because, at the time of death, the person whose estate was being administered was residing in another Member State.
Sodišče je v zadevi Eckelkamp odločilo, da je nezakonito, da država članica ne dovoli odbitka stroškov hipoteke od vrednosti premoženja zgolj zato, ker je oseba, katere premoženje se upravlja, v času smrti prebivala v drugi državi članici.
The Court decided in this case that the provisions on free movement of capital did not forbid a rule whereby the estate of a national of a Member State who dies within 10 years of ceasing to reside in that Member State is to be taxed as if that national had continued to reside in that Member State.
Sodišče je v tej zadevi odločilo, da določbe o prostem pretoku kapitala ne prepovedujejo pravila, po katerem se premoženje državljana države članice, ki umre v desetih letih po prenehanju prebivanja v tej državi članici, ne obdavči, kot če bi državljan še naprej prebival v tej državi članici.
The Court declared incompatible with free movement of capital a gift (and inheritance) tax provision according to which the tax allowance for children of the donor, in a case where all parties are non-resident, is lower than where one of them is resident.
Sodišče je razglasilo za nezdružljivo s prostim pretokom kapitala določbo o davku na darila (in dediščino), ki določa nižjo davčno olajšavo za otroke donatorja, kadar ni nihče rezident, kot če je ena izmed oseb rezident.
The Court declared that obliging an internet service or hosting provider to install a filtering system in order to prevent an infringement of intellectual property rights would infringe the freedom of the provider to conduct its business, as well as its customers' rights to the protection of their personal data and to receive or impart information.
Odločilo je, da bi obveznost za ponudnike internetnega dostopa ali storitev gostovanja, da zaradi preprečevanja kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine namestijo sistem za filtriranje, za ponudnike pomenila kršitev svobode gospodarske pobude, za njihove stranke pa kršitev pravice do varstva osebnih podatkov ter svobode sprejemanja in širjenja informacij.
The Court declared the case inadmissible as there was no link between national laws on town planning and EU law.
Sodišče je tožbo razglasilo za nedopustno, ker ni bilo povezave med nacionalnimi urbanističnimi zakoni in pravom EU.
The Court declared unconstitutional certain legal provisions enabling authorities to enforce evictions on an urgent basis at any time of the year, without taking into account the personal or family circumstances of the individuals.
Sodišče je za neustavne razglasilo nekatere pravne določbe, ki francoskim organom omogočajo, da izvajajo nujne deložacije v katerem koli letnem času, ne da bi upoštevali osebne ali družinske okoliščine posameznikov.
The Court defined the conditions under which such a threat can be exceptionally considered as established in the case of an applicant who is not specifically targeted by reason of factors particular to his/her personal circumstances and provided guidance on the use of the degree of indiscriminate violence characterising the armed conflict as a criterion for assessing the existence of a serious and individual threat.
Sodišče je določilo pogoje, v katerih se takšna grožnja izjemoma lahko šteje za dokazano v primeru prosilca, ki ga posamično ne zadeva zaradi elementov, ki so značilni za njegove osebne okoliščine, in zagotovilo smernice za uporabo stopnje samovoljnega nasilja, ki je značilno za oboroženi spopad, kot merilo za ocenjevanje obstoja resne in individualne grožnje.
The Court delivered 38 judgments under Article 258 TFEU in 2014, of which 35 (92 %) were in favour of the Commission.
Sodišče je leta 2014 izdalo 38 sodb na podlagi člena 258 PDEU, pri čemer je v 35 zadevah (92 %) ugodilo zahtevku Komisije.
The Court delivered the most judgments against Spain (5, all in favour of the Commission), Belgium (4, all in favour of the Commission), Germany (4, of which one was in Germany’s favour), Italy (4, all in favour of the Commission), Poland (4, all in favour of the Commission) and the United Kingdom (4, all in favour of the Commission).
Sodišče je največ sodb izdalo v zvezi s Španijo (5, pri čemer je v vseh zadevah ugodilo zahtevku Komisije), Belgijo (4, pri čemer je v vseh zadevah ugodilo zahtevku Komisije), Nemčijo (4, od tega je v eni zadevi ugodilo zahtevku Nemčije), Italijo (4, pri čemer je v vseh zadevah ugodilo zahtevku Komisije), Poljsko (4, pri čemer je v vseh zadevah ugodilo zahtevku Komisije) in Združenim kraljestvom (4, pri čemer je v vseh zadevah ugodilo zahtevku Komisije).
The court designated by the parties would apply the law designated under its national conflict-of-law rules.
Sodišče, ki bi ga določili stranki, bi uporabilo pravo, ki bi ga določala njegova nacionalna kolizijska pravila.
The Court developed its case-law primarily on the basis of references for preliminary rulings from national courts.
Sodišče je svojo sodno prakso razvilo predvsem na podlagi sklicev na predhodne odločitve nacionalnih sodišč.
The Court did however specify that the effects of the regulation would be maintained pending the adoption, within a reasonable period of time, of a new regulation founded on appropriate legal bases.
Vendar je Sodišče pojasnilo, da bo uredba še naprej veljala, dokler ne bo – v razumnem roku – sprejeta nova uredba, ki bo temeljila na ustrezni pravni podlagi.
The Court did not find any justification for such restriction on the free movement of capital, in particular because the period of 10 years was not based on the time needed to have effective recourse to mechanisms of mutual assistance between tax administrations or other alternative means of investigating the value of the shares in question.
Sodišče ni ugotovilo nobene utemeljitve za takšno omejitev prostega pretoka kapitala, zlasti ker 10-letno obdobje ne temelji na času, ki je potreben za učinkovite mehanizme medsebojne pomoči med davčnimi upravami ali drugimi alternativnimi sredstvi za določitev vrednosti zadevnih delnic.
The Court did not rule out that there is an obligation to implement the Directive but considered that the obligation was not sufficiently clear at the time of the infringement proceedings.
Sodišče ni izključilo dejstva, da imajo države članice obveznost glede izvajanja direktive, vendar je menilo, da ta obveznost v času postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev ni bila dovolj jasna.
The Court did not specifically examine the case in the light of the right to free movement of persons enshrined in the Treaty.
Sodišče ni posebej preučilo zadeve ob upoštevanju pravice do prostega gibanja oseb, ki je določena v Pogodbi.
The Court ensured the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms whilst recognising the imperative need to combat international terrorism.
Sodišče je zagotovilo zaščito temeljnih pravic in svoboščin ter hkrati priznalo nujnost boja proti mednarodnemu terorizmu.
The Court established that a Member State could not deny an exemption for an inheritance of a family undertaking which employed at least five workers in another Member State when it would allow such an exemption from inheritance tax if the five workers had been employed in the same Member State.
Sodišče je odločilo, da država članica ne more zanikati izvzetja za dediščino družinskega podjetja, ki zaposluje najmanj pet delavcev v drugi državi članici, medtem ko bi dovolila takšno izvzetje za davek na dediščino, če je pet delavcev zaposlenih v isti državi članici.
The court fees for obtaining the EAPO shall not be higher than the fees for obtaining an equivalent measure under national law, disproportionate to the amount of the claim, and shall not discourage claimant from making use of the procedure.
Sodne takse za izdajo ENZBR ne smejo biti višje od taks za pridobitev enakovrednega ukrepa na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje in nesorazmerne z zneskom zahtevka ter tožnika ne smejo odvrniti od uporabe postopka.
The Court finally concluded that the Commission had not proved to the requisite legal standard that the downwards ex-post adjustments were contrary to the objectives of the Treaty and annulled the relevant part of the decision.
Nazadnje je Sodišče prve stopnje sklenilo, da Komisiji ni uspelo v skladu s potrebnim pravnim standardom dokazati, da naknadne prilagoditve navzdol nasprotujejo ciljem Pogodbe, in razveljavilo zadevni del odločbe.
the court for the place where the creditor is habitually resident, or
sodišče kraja, kjer ima upravičenec svoje običajno prebivališče, ali
the court for the place where the defendant is habitually resident,
sodišče kraja, kjer ima tožena stranka svoje običajno prebivališče, ali
The Court found no objective difference between the two situations that could justify the difference in treatment.
Sodišče ni ugotovilo nobene objektivne razlike med obema primeroma, ki bi lahko upravičila razliko v obravnavi.
The Court found that a share of this size gave those persons influence over the decisions of the company concerned and made it possible for them to decide upon its activities.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je tovrstni delež dal tem osebam vpliv pri odločanju o zadevnem podjetju in jim omogočil sprejemanje odločitev o njegovih dejavnostih.
The Court found that delegated acts cover cases where the Commission adopts "rules coming within the regulatory framework as defined by the basic legislative act" whereas the implementing act provides "further detail in relation to the content of a legislative act, in order to ensure that it is implemented under uniform conditions in all Member States".
Razsodilo je, da se delegirani akti nanašajo na primere, ko Komisija sprejme pravila, ki spadajo pod uredbeni okvir, kakor ga opredeljuje temeljni zakonodajni akt, medtem ko se z izvedbenim aktom določi vsebina zakonodajnega akta, s tem pa njegova enotna izvedba v vseh državah članicah.
The Court found that direct costs associated with managing the Fund by the Commission were low and so the Fund was considered to be working efficiently.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so neposredni stroški, ki jih ima Komisija z upravljanjem sklada, nizki, zato meni, da sklad posluje učinkovito.
The Court found that the Spanish rules requiring that a residence visa for family reunification be obtained by such nationals for the issue of a residence permit, constituted an incorrect transposition of and a measure contrary to, inter alia, Directive 90/365.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so španska pravila, ki od takšnih državljanov za izdajo dovoljenja za prebivanje zahtevajo, da pridobijo vizum za prebivanje za združitev družine, predstavljala nepravilen prenos Direktive 90/365 in ukrep, ki je, med drugimi, s to direktivo v nasprotju.
The Court found therefore that the Fund did not provide a rapid response.
Sodišče je zato ugotovilo, da Sklad ne zagotavlja hitrega odziva.
The Court furthermore held in Gambelli28 that services offered by electronic means were covered and that national legislation which prohibits operators established in a Member State from offering on-line gambling services to consumers in another Member State, or hampers the freedom to receive or to benefit as a recipient from the services offered by a supplier established in another Member State, constitutes a restriction on the freedom to provide services.
Poleg tega je Sodišče v zadevi Gambelli28 odločilo, da so storitve, ki se izvajajo prek elektronskih sredstev, zaobjete v členu ter da nacionalna zakonodaja, ki ponudnikom s sedežem v državi članici prepoveduje opravljanje spletnih iger na srečo potrošnikom v drugi državi članici ali ovira svobodo prejemanja ali koriščenja storitev, ki jo ponuja ponudnik s sedežem v drugi državi članici, pomeni omejevanje svobode opravljanja storitev.
The Court had previously examined the tax treatment by Member States of charities established in other Member States as well as of donations to such entities.
Sodišče je predhodno preučilo davčno obravnavo dobrodelnih ustanov s strani držav članic s sedežem v drugih državah članicah ter donacij takšnim ustanovam.
The Court has also confirmed that the Commission has competence to make recommendations for harmonising the measures required by Articles 18 and 19 of the CNS concerning the design, construction and operation of nuclear installations which can be the subject of the provisions which the Member States lay down to ensure compliance with the basic standards.
Sodišče je prav tako potrdilo, da je Komisija pristojna za pripravo priporočil za uskladitev ukrepov, ki jih zahtevata člena 18 in 19 Konvencije o jedrski varnosti v zvezi z načrtovanjem, gradnjo in delovanjem jedrskih objektov, za katere lahko veljajo določbe, ki jih države članice določajo za zagotovitev skladnosti s temeljnimi standardi.
The Court has also held that "in cases of actual discrimination falling within the scope of the direct application of Article 119, comparisons are confined to parallels which may be drawn on the basis of concrete appraisals of the work actually performed by employees of different sex within the same establishment or service"15.
Sodišče je tudi razsodilo, da je „v primerih dejanske diskriminacije, ki spada na področje neposredne uporabe člena 119, primerjava možna le na podlagi konkretnih ocen dejansko opravljenega dela zaposlenih oseb različnih spolov znotraj istega podjetja ali službe“15.
The Court has also produced a special report on EU assistance to the health sector.
Sodišče je prav tako pripravilo posebno poročilo o pomoči EU zdravstvenemu sektorju.
The Court has also provided criteria to assess the proportionality of authorisation systems: these must aim at the protection of a legitimate general interest and foresee strict time limits for the exercise of opposition powers, assets or management decisions targeted must be specifically listed, and the system’s objective and stable criteria must be subject to an effective review by the courts5.
Sodišče je tudi zagotovilo merila za ocenjevanje sorazmernosti sistemov odobritev, in sicer varovati morajo legitimne splošne interese in predvideti stroge roke za uveljavljanje pravice do ugovora, ciljne odločitve glede sredstev ali upravljanja morajo biti posebej navedene, cilj sistema in stabilna merila pa morajo biti predmet učinkovitega pregleda, ki ga izvedejo sodišča5.
The Court has concluded that the economic aim pursued by Article 141 EC is secondary to the social aim pursued by the same provision, which constitutes the expression of a fundamental right1.
Sodišče je sklenilo, da je gospodarski cilj iz člena 141 ES drugotnega pomena v primerjavi s socialnim ciljem iz iste določbe, ki izraža temeljno pravico1.