natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mr Hernandez Bataller concluded the discussion on this item by pointing out that Rule 17F in the Implementing Provisions already provided for the possibility, in an emergency, of appointing a rapporteur and study group direct, subject to ratification by the relevant section; he suggested that such a rule could be made general.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je na tej točki razpravo sklenil in dejal, da člen 17 F izvedbenih določb za nujne primere predvideva možnost takojšnjega imenovanja poročevalca in sestave študijske skupine, če to odobri strokovna skupina; predlagal je tudi splošno rabo takšnega predpisa.
Mr Hernandez Bataller explained that he had concentrated all the elements of the remit on which the Panel had reached a consensus in the first part of the document (points A and B).
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je pojasnil, da je v prvem delu dokumenta (točki A in B) zbral vse elemente mandata, za katere v komisiji obstaja soglasje.
Mr Hernandez Bataller recommended that the Panel should carefully adopt the points on which a consensus had already been reached.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je priporočil, da se komisija za poslovnik skrbno loti potrjevanja točk, pri katerih je že dosegla soglasje.
Mr Hernandez Bataller replied that his proposal was an attempt to make the Rules of Procedure consistent with Article 267 of the EC Treaty.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je nato dejal, da je s svojim predlogom skušal poslovnik uskladiti z določbami člena 267 Pogodbe ES.
Mr Hernandez Bataller thanked the secretariat, particularly the Legal Service and the Translation Service, for the help they had given him in drawing up his proposals.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER se je zahvalil sekretariatu ter zlasti pravni in prevajalski službi za njihovo pomoč pri pripravi predlogov.
Mr Hernandez Bataller then gave a concise presentation of the proposals that had been submitted for the Assembly's consideration.
Nato je na kratko povzel predloge, ki so bili predloženi v obravnavo skupščini.
Mr Hernandez Bataller, however, stressed the need to launch a wide-ranging discussion on the setting-up of a platform for consulting organisations representing civil society, as had been done at the European Parliament.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER pa je poudaril, da je treba začeti poglobljeno razpravo o tem, da se po vzoru Evropskega parlamenta vzpostavi posvetovalna platforma s predstavniškimi organizacijami civilne družbe.
Mr Hernández Bataller (ES – III)
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER (ES‑III)
Mr Hernández Bataller (ES – III)
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER (III. sk.-ES)
Mr Hernández Bataller (ES-II)
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER (ES - III)
Mr Hernández Bataller (ES-III)
HERNANDEZ BATALLER (ES‑III)
Mr Hernández Bataller (ES-III)
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER (ES - III)
Mr Hernández Bataller (ES-III)
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER (ES‑III)
Mr Hernández Bataller addressed that question explaining the scope and confirming that food was excluded from the scope of those regulations.
Na ta vprašanja se je odzval Bernardo HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER, ki je pojasnil področje uporabe teh uredb in potrdil, da je hrana iz njega izključena.
Mr Hernández Bataller agreed to incorporate the change - which was also approved by the other Panel members – in his proposals.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER se je strinjal, da to spremembo, ki so jo podprli tudi drugi člani komisije, vključi v svoje predloge.
Mr Hernández Bataller agreed to the proposal and the RP Panel unanimously approved the proposed wording of Rule 43, as amended.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER se je s predlogom strinjal in komisija za poslovnik je soglasno sprejela tako spremenjen predlog spremembe člena 43.
Mr Hernández Bataller and the RP Panel agreed to both proposed changes.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER in komisija za poslovnik sta se strinjala z obema predlogoma za spremembe.
Mr Hernández Bataller called for more in-depth analysis of the various implications of Group I and the secretariat's respective proposals.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je zahteval, da se temeljiteje proučijo različne posledice predlogov I. skupine in sekretariata.
Mr Hernández Bataller concluded by saying he would present a revised version of his proposal.
G. HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je na koncu dejal, da bo predstavil revidirano različico predloga.
Mr Hernández Bataller disputed the Quaestors' mandate and expressed the view that the Bureau still needed to take a decision on the final draft of this text.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je izrazil zadržke o mandatu kvestorjev ter menil, da bi se o končni obliki besedila moralo izreči predsedstvo.
Mr Hernández Bataller explained that the document referred, firstly, to the decisions already taken by the RP panel, including the items discussed on 22 February 2010 regarding the impact of the Lisbon Treaty (points 1, 2 and 3 of the document) and, secondly, to those points that remained to be discussed (point 4).
Ta je pojasnil, da dokument vključuje tako sklepe, ki jih je komisija za poslovnik že sprejela – vključno z elementi, ki se nanašajo na posledice začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe in so bili obravnavani 22. februarja 2010 – (točke 1, 2 in 3 dokumenta) kot tudi točke, ki jih je treba še preučiti (točka 4).
Mr Hernández Bataller highlighted the support provided by the secretariat in this respect.
Bernardo HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je izpostavil podporo sekretariata pri teh dejavnostih.
Mr Hernández Bataller informed the assembly that the section had adopted its opinion on 27 July 2005 by a majority, with four votes against and three abstentions.
HERNÁNDEZA BATALLERA, ki je člane obvestil, da je bilo mnenje v strokovni skupini sprejeto z večino 27. julija 2005, in sicer s 4 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
Mr Hernández Bataller mentioned the difficulties which the heating problems in the Committee's lobby were causing members and staff.
HernÁndez Bataller pa je opozoril na težave z ogrevanjem v preddverju stavbe Odbora, kar je za člane in osebje neprijetno.
Mr Hernández Bataller noted, however, that consensus had already been reached on the main part of the proposed revision, and that the disagreement related only to the possible insertion proposed by Group I.
Vendar pa je g. HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER opozoril, da je bilo o bistvenem delu predloga revizije že doseženo soglasje in da ostaja nesoglasje zgolj glede morebitnega dodatka, ki ga predlaga I. skupina.
Mr Hernández Bataller outlined the content of the proposal and pointed out that its aim was to provide a stronger framework for drafting own-initiative opinions, focusing on those subjects that deserved to be dealt with in the context.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER predstavil predlog in povedal, da je njegov namen bolje opredeliti pripravo mnenj na lastno pobudo, da bi bila ta posvečena temam, ki si res zaslužijo obravnavo v tem okviru.
Mr Hernández Bataller presented document CESE 500/2010 which had been drawn up by the secretariat and contained technical amendments imposed by the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.
G. HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je predstavil dokument CESE 500/2010, ki ga je pripravil sekretariat in združuje vse tehnične spremembe, ki so nujno potrebne zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe.
Mr Hernández Bataller presented his proposed wording for Rule 43 of the Implementing provisions (on participation by section presidents in other bodies' meetings, doc.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je predstavil svoj predlog spremembe člena 43 izvedbenih določb (v zvezi s sodelovanjem predsednikov strokovnih skupin na sejah drugih organov, dok.
Mr Hernández Bataller presented point 1.3 of his proposal, concerning review of the provisions on composition of the Bureau and election of its members.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je predstavil točko 1.3 iz svojega predloga, ki se nanaša na revizijo določb o sestavi predsedstva in volitvah njegovih članov.
Mr Hernández Bataller proposed the following amendment (amendment 3):
HERNANDEZ BATALLER je predlagal naslednji amandma (amandma 3):
Mr Hernández Bataller proposed the following amendment (amendment 4):
HERNANDEZ BATALLER je predlagal naslednji amandma (amandma 4):
Mr Hernández Bataller replied that these were linguistic issues, and urged the secretariat to ensure that all the language versions of the Rule were faithful to the wording of the Spanish text.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je odgovoril, da gre pri tem za vprašanja jezikovne narave, in sekretariat pozval, naj vse jezikovne različice tega člena zvesto sledijo španskemu besedilu.
Mr Hernández Bataller responded that Mr Zufiaur's proposal appeared to specifically target the REX section's activities, and should therefore, if appropriate, be included in a separate paragraph.
ZUFIAURA nanaša posebej na dejavnosti strokovne komisije REX; zato bi mu moral biti po potrebi posvečen poseben odstavek.
Mr Hernández Bataller responded to the various speakers' comments, focusing on the follow-up to be given to the proposals concerning the Budget Group's role.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je odgovoril na pripombe posameznih govornikov in povedal, da se bo o predlogih glede vloge skupine za proračun še razpravljalo.
Mr Hernández Bataller said such a classification was useful in distinguishing amendments that merited a discussion in the plenary from those of a technical nature and from counter-opinions.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je zagotovil, da je to koristno, saj bo tako možno ločevati med amandmaji, o katerih je treba razpravljati na plenarnem zasedanju, ter amandmaji tehnične narave in nasprotnimi mnenji.
Mr Hernández Bataller then took the floor to draw the panel's attention to the importance of creating a new instrument for coordination with civil society organisations, within the new institutional context and with a view to strengthening the role of the EESC.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER, ki je člane opozoril, kako pomembno bi bilo v novem institucionalnem okviru in z vidika krepitve vloge EESO uvesti nov pripomoček za usklajevanje z organizacijami civilne družbe.
Mr Hernández Bataller took the floor and confirmed the importance he attached to the principle of equal treatment of members and alternates, but Ms O'Neill proposed that the Panel return to the issue of the relevance of the provision allowing members to be replaced by alternates (Rule 18 (RP)), given the problems that created in terms of continuity of study-group work.
O' NEILL pa je komisiji predlagala, da bi ponovno obravnavali pomen določbe, ki članom omogoča, da imajo namestnika (člen 18 poslovnika), glede na težave, ki jih to prinaša za kontinuiteto dela študijskih skupin.
Mr Hernández Bataller took the floor to explain that his proposal (adding a new paragraph to Rule 21 (RP)) was intended to take into account the Lisbon Treaty provisions on "horizontal" clauses (social clause, environmental clause and consumer protection clause) and the provision on respect for the Charter of Fundamental Rights, making observatories and a subcommittee respectively responsible for monitoring in these areas.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je pojasnil svoj predlog (da se doda nov odstavek k členu 21 poslovnika), da bi upoštevali določbe Lizbonske pogodbe v zvezi s "horizontalnimi" klavzulami (socialne klavzule, okoljske klavzule in klavzule o varstvu potrošnikov) in določbe v zvezi s spoštovanjem Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah ter skupine za spremljanje in pododbor zadolžili za spremljanje na teh področjih.
Mr Hernández Bataller took the floor to stress that the complex wording of his proposal was due to his efforts to take into account all the remarks made throughout the discussions.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER in poudaril, da je kompleksnost predlaganega besedila plod prizadevanja, da bi upošteval vse pripombe iz vseh razprav.
Mr Hernández Bataller went through this document, setting out the changes to the founding treaties that had direct consequences for the Committee.
G. HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je naredil pregled tega dokumenta in predstavil spremembe ustanovnih pogodb, ki neposredno vplivajo na Odbor.
Mr Hernández Bataller, Mr Dassis, Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Morkis, Mr Nyberg, Mr Pater, Mr Callanan and Mr Janson took part in the general debate that followed.
Med splošno razpravo, ki je sledila, so besedo prevzeli gospodje HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER, DASSIS, PEGADO LIZ, MORKIS, NYBERG, PATER, CALLANAN in JANSON.
Mr Heron, administrator, Recruitment, Careers and Training unit (DHR)
HERON, administrator, zaposlovanje, napredovanje in izobraževanje (direkcija za kadrovske in interne zadeve)
Mr Herring (for the co-rapporteur)
Stephen HERRING (za soporočevalca)
Mr Hervé Coupeau (Gr.
Hervé COUPEAU (III. sk.
Mr HICK
g. HICK
Mr Hick also felt that the fears expressed about possible inequalities of treatment under the current system, to the detriment of staff with the groups, were without foundation.
HICK je še ocenil, da so bojazni, ki so se pojavile glede morebitne neenakosti obravnave v sedanjem režimu – v škodo osebja skupin – neutemeljene.
Mr Hick confirmed that even the most recent version of the Group I proposal could affect the principle of equal treatment for all staff, in that it involved a political authority in appointment decisions.
HICK pa je potrdil, da bi tudi zadnja različica predloga I. skupine lahko ogrozila načelo enake obravnave osebja, in sicer zato, ker povezuje politični organ s pristojnostjo za imenovanja.
Mr Hick explained that the Staff Committee’s view was different from that contained in the proposal, which would allocate the duties of appointing authority to different people for temporary staff and officials on secondment to the groups.
HICK je pojasnil, da je mnenje odbora uslužbencev drugačno od razmišljanja v predlogih, ki naj bi razlikovali funkciji organa za imenovanja glede začasnih uslužbencev in uradnikov, napotenih v skupine.
Mr Hick then took the floor to reiterate the opinion of the Staff Committee, which was that the proposal submitted by Group I could lead to unequal treatment of different categories of staff.
HICK predstavil stališče odbora osebja, ki meni, da bi lahko predlog I. skupine povzročil neenako obravnavo različnih kategorij osebja.
Mr Hilde van Lare
Hilde VAN LARE
Mr Holger Schwannecke
José Isaías RODRIGUEZ SÁNCHEZ
Mr Holm (for the rapporteur)
Stefan HOLM (za poročevalca)
Mr Horacio Gonzalez Aleman (for Group I)
(za I. skupino)
Mr Horacio González Alemán (for the rapporteur)
Horacio GONZÁLEZ ALEMÁN (za poročevalca)
Mr Horst Günther (for the rapporteur)
Horst Günther
Mr Hosman (Cat.
HOSMAN (Kat.
Mr Hribar (SI-Gr.
HRIBAR (SI-II)
Mr Hribar (SI/II)
Bojan HRIBAR (SI-II)
Mr Hribar (SI–II)
Bojan HRIBAR (SI-II)
Mr Hristov (BG – II)
Derruine (BE-II)
Mr Hristov (BG-II)
DERRUINE (BE-II)
Mr Hrovatič (SI/III)
Igor HROVATIČ (SI-III)
Mr Hrovatič (SI–III)
Igor HROVATIČ (SI-III)
Mr Hrovatič (SL–III)
Igor HROVATIČ (SI-III)
Mr Hubert CAMBIER (for the group II)
(za II. skupino)
Mr Hubert Cambier (for the Group III)
Hubert CAMBIER (za III. skupino)
Mr Hubert Cambier (for the rapporteur)
Hubert CAMBIER (za poročevalca)
Mr Hubert Delorme (for the rapporteur)
(za poročevalca)
Mr Hugues Mingarelli, Managing Director, Middle East & Southern Neighbourhood, European External Action Service (EEAS) (tbc)
Hugues Mingarelli, generalni direktor, Bližnji vzhod in južno sosedstvo, Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) (še ni potrjeno),
Mr Hunter suggested that the Committee should make members of the Scottish Parliament aware of the difficulties the president was facing, and consider, together with them, the possibility of an EESC vice-president chairing the Bureau meeting in Edinburgh.
HUNTER je predlagal, da se s člani škotskega parlamenta pogovori o težavah, s katerimi se sooča predsednica in da se oceni možnost, da bi vodstvo seje predsedstva v Edinburgu prevzel eden od podpredsednikov EESO.
Mr Hunter, whilst supporting Mr Malosse, stressed the interface role played by the Committee and its need to remain at the service of the citizen.
G. HUNTER je podprl g. MALOSSA in hkrati poudaril, da ima Odbor povezovalno vlogo in da mora prisluhniti državljanom.
Mr Huntjens found the existence of the bureau unwarranted.
G. Huntjens je menil, da obstoj predsedstva ni upravičen.
Mr Huvelin stressed the need to create a favourable atmosphere for business in Europe and to adapt education to life.
HUVELIN je poudaril, da je treba v Evropi ustvariti podjetništvu prijazno ozračje in izobraževanje prilagoditi življenju.
Mr Hérnandez Bataller (ES-III)
Bernardo HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER (ES-III)
Mr Hérve Jouanjean, Deputy Secretary-General of the European Commission, will attend the meeting.
Udeležba Hervéja JOUANJEANA, pomočnika generalnega sekretarja Evropske komisije
Mr Igor Hrovatič (SI-III)
Igor HROVATIČ (SI-III)
Mr Igor Hrovatič (SL - III)
Igor HROVATIČ (SI-III)
Mr Igor Šarmír (SK – I)
Igor ŠARMÍR (SK-I)
Mr Ikrath (AT-I)
Michael IKRATH (AT-I)
Mr Ioannis Kolyvas (GR-III)
Ioannis KOLYVAS (GR-III)
Mr Ion Pop (RO-Cat.
Ion POP (RO-kat.
Mr Ionita (RO-III)
Sorin IONITĂ (RO – III. sk.)
Mr Ionita (RO-III)
Sorin IONIŢĂ (RO-III)
Mr Ionita (RO-III)
Sorin IONIȚĂ (RO-III)
Mr Ionita (RO-III))
Sorin IONIŢĂ (RO-III)
Mr Ioniță (RO-III)
Sorin IONIȚĂ (RO-III)
Mr Ionut Sibian (RO-III)
Ionut SIBIAN (RO-III)
Mr Ionuţ Sibian (RO-III)
Ionuţ SIBIAN (RO-III)
Mr Iovko Stefanov Iotzev (for the rapporteur)
Iovko STEFANOV IOTZEV
Mr Iovko Stefanov Iotzev (for the rapporteur)
Iovko STEFANOV IOTZEV (za poročevalko)
Mr Iozia
Edgardo MARIA IOZIA
Mr IOZIA (II-IT)
IOZIA (IT-II)
Mr Iozia (IT - II)
DERRUINE (BE-II)
Mr Iozia (IT-II)
Edgardo IOZIA (IT-II)
Mr Iozia (IT-II)
Edgardo Maria IOZIA (IT–II)
Mr Iozia (IT-II)
Edgardo Maria IOZIA, (IT-II)
Mr Iozia (IT-II) (Rule 62 Florio)
IOZIA (IT-II) (FLORIO, člen 62)
Mr Iozia (IT-II) (Rule 62)
Edgardo Maria IOZIA (IT-II) (Emilio FATOVIC, člen 62)
Mr Iozia (IT-II) – rule 62 – Mr Fatovic
Edgardo Maria IOZIA (IT-II) (Emilio FATOVIC, člen 62)
Mr Iozia concluded by raising the subject of the publication of important information in all the EU languages.
IOZIA dotaknil vprašanja objave pomembnih informacij v vseh uradnih jezikih EU.
Mr Iozia explained that a set of amendments (Am.
G. IOZIA je razložil, da je sklop amandmajev (am.
Mr Iozia stressed the importance of setting up an agency to provide a regulatory framework in 27 countries.
Ustanovitev agencije bi bila izredno pomembna za zagotovitev pravnega okvira za 27 držav.
Mr Iozia, the rapporteur, presented the opinion.
IOZIA, je predstavil mnenje.
Mr István Farkas, for Group III
István FARKAS (za III. skupino)
Mr Italianer then touched on the programme's priorities, particularly the initiatives to support growth and employment, including the recovery plan designed to address the effects of the financial crisis.
Zatem je predstavil prednostne točke programa, zlasti pobude za podporo programu za rast in delovna mesta, del tega je tudi načrt za oživitev (Recovery Plan), namenjen obvladovanju posledic finančne krize.
Mr Iuliano (IT-II)
g. Iuliano (IT-II)
Mr Iuliano (IT–II)
Giuseppe IULIANO (IT–II)
Mr Iuliano drew attention to a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union against a Member State's law, which discriminated against immigrants.
IULIANO, ki je spomnil na sodbo Sodišča EU proti zakonodaji ene izmed držav članic, s katero je ta diskriminirala priseljence; g.
Mr Iuliano underlined that the draft opinion was a request by the Commission on two very important issues and called for the EESC to come up with a broad consensus.
G. IULIANO je poudaril, da je bil osnutek mnenja pripravljen na zaprosilo Komisije, in sicer o dveh zelo pomembnih vprašanjih, ter EESO pozval k zagotovitvi širokega soglasja.
Mr Ivan Kokalov (BG-II)
Ivan KOKALOV (BG-II)
Mr Ivan Krupyanko
Ivan KRUPYANKO
Mr Ivan Lichner (for the rapporteur)
Ivan LICHNER
Mr Ivan Voleš (Gr.
Ivan VOLEŠ (I. sk.
Mr Ivan Voleš (GR.
Josef VOLEŠ (I. sk.
Mr Ivan Voleš (GR.
Soporočevalec: Josef VOLEŠ (I. sk.
Mr Ivascu (RO-II)
Minel IVASCU (RO-II)
Mr Ivaşcu (RO-II)
Mihai IVAŞCU (RO-III)
Mr Ivaşcu (RO-II)
Minel IVAŞCU (RO-II)
Mr Ivaşcu (RO-II)
NICOSEVICI (RO-III)
Mr Ivașcu (RO-II)
Minel IVAȘCU (RO-II)
Mr Iván Calabuig-Williams (Group III)
Señor Iván CALABUIG-WILLIAMS (Skupina III)
Mr Jaakko Weuro (for the rapporteur)
Jaakko WEURO (za poročevalca)
Mr Jaap Doek (for Group II)
Jaap DOEK (za II. skupino)
Mr Jacek Krawczyk (Gr.
Jacek KRAWCZYK (I. sk.
Mr Jacques Barrot, member of the European Commission, will attend the session on
Jacquesa BARROTA, člana Evropske komisije
Mr Jacques Barrot, Vice-president of the European Commission,
Udeležba Jacquesa BARROTA, podpredsednika Evropske komisije,
Mr Jacques Dermagne, President of the French Economic and Social Council,
Nastop Jacquesa DERMAGNA, predsednika Ekonomsko-socialnega sveta Francije.
Mr Jacques Diouf, Director-General of the FAO
dr. Jacques DIOUF, generalni direktor FAO
Mr Jacques Diouf, Director-General of the FAO
dr. Jacquesa DIOUFA, generalnega direktorja FAO,
Mr Jacques Diouf, Director-General of the FAO
Udeležba Jacquesa DIOUFA, generalnega direktorja FAO,
Mr Jacques Dirand (Group I)
Jacques Dirand (za I. skupino)
Mr Jacques Lemercier (FR-II)
Jacques LEMERCIER (FR-II)
Mr Jahier
JAHIER
Mr Jahier (IT–III)
Luca JAHIER (IT-III)
Mr Jahier (president of Group III) said that for him, Mr Sepi had been first and foremost a man of great conviction, a patient partner in dialogue, with great trust in the European institutions.
Luca JAHIER (predsednik III. skupine) je opozoril na karakterne lastnosti nekdanjega predsednika, ki so bile po njegovem mnenju odločilne: njegovo globoko prepričanje, potrpežljivost pri dialogu in zaupanje v evropske institucije.
Mr Jahier added that, with regard to the redistribution of the budget that would be effected in September, priority should be given to the missions to be carried out in the context of the drafting of the opinion on the social pillar.
Luca JAHIER je dodal, da je treba pri prerazporeditvi proračuna v septembru dati prednost izvedbi nalog za pripravo mnenja o socialnem stebru.
Mr Jahier also expressed support for the concrete actions outlined in the opinion and for the proposed setting-up of an EESC Active European Citizenship group.
JAHIER je posebej podprl konkretne ukrepe, ki jih navaja mnenje, in predlagano ustanovitev skupine EESO za dejavno evropsko državljanstvo.
Mr Jahier also informed the members on the various activities of the Development Committee of the European Parliament and of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly on this topic.
Jahier je člane seznanil tudi z različnimi dejavnostmi odbora Evropskega parlamenta za razvoj in parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU na tem področju.
Mr Jahier also noted that the asymmetry of present relations must be taken very seriously as the starting point.
Glede na asimetrijo sedanjih odnosov je treba zadevo vzeti resno.
Mr Jahier also spoke in favour of a more nuanced and structured debate than that which had initially been announced.
Tudi Luca JAHIER je bil mnenja, da bi morala biti razprava bolj raznolika in strukturirana od prvotno napovedane.
Mr Jahier also took the floor to support the work of the Secretary-General and to criticise the purely administrative approach to cooperation that the CoR appeared to be advocating.
Spregovoril je tudi Luca JAHIER, ki je podprl delo generalnega sekretarja in kritiziral pristop zgolj upravnega sodelovanja, za katerega se zavzema OR.
Mr Jahier also took time to explain why social bonds were of the utmost importance.
Jahier je nekaj časa namenil tudi pojasnjevanju, zakaj so socialne obveznice izjemno pomembne.
Mr Jahier also urged that – for the sake of clarity – in future, when own-initiative proposals for submission to the Bureau were being considered, section presidents should systematically ask the members who had introduced proposals to make their case to the section bureau, which was responsible for deciding between them.
JAHIER je v razpravi pozval, naj predsedniki strokovnih skupin v prihodnje – zaradi jasnosti – ob obravnavi predlogov mnenj na lastno pobudo, ki se predložijo predsedstvu, redno povabijo člane, da lahko svoje predloge pojasnijo predsedstvu strokovne skupine, ki nato odloča med različnimi predlogi.
Mr Jahier asked for it to be noted that a discussion of this report was being postponed for the fourth time; the report on the CAF procedure had met with a similar fate at the beginning of the year.
Luca JAHIER je prosil, naj se zabeleži, da je bila obravnava poročila preložena že četrtič, enako je bilo tudi v primeru poročila o izvajanju skupnega ocenjevalnega okvira (CAF) v začetku leta.