natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court has developed the criteria of comparability with regard to the principle of equal pay for men and women.
Sodišče je razvilo merila primerljivosti v zvezi z načelom enakega plačila moških in žensk.
The court has for the first time judged the limits for national level collective action in a transnational context.
Sodišče se je prvič izreklo o mejah kolektivnih ukrepov na nacionalni ravni v nadnacionalnem okviru.
The Court has found that if an additional recovery process is required before further use, even if such subsequent use is certain, this is evidence that the material is a waste until the process has been completed (Avesta Polarit12).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je v primeru zahtevanega dodatnega postopka obdelave pred nadaljnjo uporabo, tudi če je takšna naknadna uporaba gotova, to dokaz, da je material odpadek, dokler postopek ni končan (Avesta Polarit12).
The Court has gone on to point out that employees' contributions, in a contributory occupational scheme, must be the same for both sexes.
Nadalje je Sodišče opozorilo, da morajo biti prispevki zaposlenih v poklicno shemo, ki temelji na prispevkih, enaki za oba spola.
The Court has handed down its judgment in a case that involved a request of an organisation to have access to Commission documents relating to the investigation of a potential infringement of EU law by a Member State.49
Sodišče je izdalo sodbo v zadevi, ki se je nanašala na zahtevek organizacije za dostop do dokumentov Komisije o preiskavi možnih kršitev države članice glede prava EU.49
The Court has held on several occasions that the determination of equal value involves a comparison of the work of the female worker and her male comparator by reference to the demands made upon the workers in carrying out the tasks such as skill, effort and responsibility, or the work undertaken and the nature of the tasks involved in the work to be performed.
Sodišče je večkrat razsodilo, da določanje enake vrednosti temelji na primerjavi dela zaposlene ženske in za primerjavo vzetega zaposlenega moškega z upoštevanjem zahtev, predpisanih za izvajanje nalog, kot so usposobljenost, prizadevnost in odgovornost, ali pa prevzetega dela ter narave nalog, ki so potrebne za opravljanje dela.
The Court has held that the essential characteristic of remuneration lies in the fact that it constitutes consideration for the services in question and has recognized that the characteristic of remuneration is absent in the case of activities performed, for no consideration, by the State or on behalf of the State in the context of its duties in the social, cultural, educational and judicial fields, such as courses provided under the national education system, or the management of social security schemes which do not engage in economic activity.
Sodišče meni, da je bistveni element plačila dejstvo, da predstavlja denarno nadomestilo za ustrezne storitve in ugotavlja, da plačila ni pri dejavnostih, ki jih brez nadomestila izvaja država ali se izvajajo v imenu države v okviru izvajanja njenih dolžnosti na socialnem, kulturnem, izobraževalnem in pravosodnem področju, kot so predavanja in tečaji v okviru nacionalnega izobraževalnega sistema ali upravljanje sistemov socialne varnosti, ki niso del gospodarskih dejavnosti.
The Court has held that the freedom to provide services includes the freedom for the recipients of services, including persons in need of medical treatment, to go to another Member Sate in order to receive those services there17.
Sodišče meni, da pravica opravljanja storitev vključuje pravico prejemnikov storitev, vključno z osebami, ki potrebujejo zdravljenje, do navedenih storitev v drugi državi članici17.
The Court has held that the principle established by that Article may be invoked before national Courts, in particular in cases of discrimination arising directly from legislative provisions or collective labour agreements, as well as in cases in which work is carried out in the same establishment or service, whether private or public (see, inter alia, Defrenne II, paragraph 40; Case 129/79 Macarthys [1980] ECR 1275, paragraph 10; and Case 96/80 Jenkins [1981] ECR 911, paragraph 17).
Sodišče je razsodilo, da se je na načelo, ki ga določa ta člen, mogoče sklicevati pred nacionalnimi sodišči, zlasti v primerih diskriminacije, ki izhaja neposredno iz zakonskih določb ali panožnih kolektivnih pogodb, kot tudi v primerih, ko se delo opravlja v istem podjetju ali službi, tako zasebni kot javni (glej med drugim Defrenne II, odstavek 40; zadevo 129/79, Macarthys, [1980] Recueil 1275, odstavek 10; in zadevo 96/80 Jenkins [1981] Recueil 911, odstavek 17).
The Court has held40 that in order to establish that a civil service retirement scheme falls within the scope of Article 141 EC (ex-Article 119 of the EC Treaty) the fact that the pension benefit is linked to the employment relationship and, as a result, is paid by the State in its capacity as employer, that criterion cannot be regarded as exclusive, in as much as pensions paid under statutory social security schemes may reflect, wholly or in part, pay in respect of work (Beune, paragraph 44, and Griesmar, paragraph 29).
Sodišče je razsodilo40, da za ugotovitev, da pokojninska shema za javne uslužbence spada na področje uporabe člena 141 ES (prejšnji člen 119 Pogodbe ES), kot edino merilo ne more veljati dejstvo, da je pokojninska pravica vezana na zaposlitveno razmerje in jo zato izplačuje država kot delodajalec, saj se pokojnine iz zakonsko predpisanih shem socialne varnosti lahko v celoti ali delno nanašajo na plačilo v zvezi z delom (Beune, odstavek 44 in Griesmar, odstavek 29).
The Court has in effect recognised that equalisation of benefit costs more.
Sodišče je dejansko priznalo, da izenačenje prejemkov stane več.
The Court has issued a number of partial guidelines on this matter, but these have not addressed the issue in its entirety.
Slednje je v zvezi s tem izdalo številne delne smernice, vendar pa na ta način ni zajeta celotna problematika.
the court has not examined the justification of the claim before issuing the notification
da sodišče pred izdajo obvestila ni preverilo utemeljitve zahtevka;
The court has ordered …
Sodišče je odredilo, da
The court has ordered, that following bank account of the defendant has to be preserved up to amount noted in point 6.5:
Sodišče je odredilo, da je treba zamrzniti naslednji bančni račun toženca do zneska, navedenega v točki 6.5:
The Court has outlined the factors which may justify such conditions:24
Sodišče je predstavilo dejavnike, ki lahko upravičijo take pogoje:24
The Court has passed down its judgement on 3 September 2009 and ruled that both Articles 159§3 and 308 should be used as the legal basis and has therefore annulled Council Regulation (EC) No 1968/2006 and asked the institutions to adopt a replacement regulation with a dual legal basis.
Sodišče je 3. septembra 2009 izreklo sodbo, v kateri je odločilo, da je treba kot pravno podlago uporabiti oba člena 159(3) in 308, ter zato razveljavilo Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1968/2006 in pozvalo institucije, naj sprejmejo nadomestno uredbo z dvojno pravno podlago.
The Court has pointed out that this conclusion necessarily extends to specific aspects of the questions referred to it for a preliminary ruling in the Neath and Coloroll cases, namely the capitalisation of part of the periodic pension and the transfer of pension rights, whose value can only be determined in terms of the funding arrangements.
Sodišče je opozorilo, da se ta sklep nujno širi na določene vidike vprašanj, ki so mu bila predložena v predhodno odločanje v zadevah Neath and Coloroll, namreč pretvorba dela redne pokojnine v glavnico in prenos pokojninskih pravic, katerih vrednost se lahko določi le glede načina financiranja.
The Court has rejected those arguments and held, for example, that no residence requirement can be applied to the child of a frontier worker, who is therefore entitled to tuition under the same conditions as those applicable to children of nationals of the Member State of employment78.
Sodišče je navedene trditve zavrnilo in na primer odločilo, da za otroka obmejnega delavca ne sme veljati pogoj stalnega bivališča, tako da je ta upravičen do pouka pod enakimi pogoji, kot veljajo za otroke državljanov države članice zaposlitve78.
The Court has repeatedly assessed the dynamic interpretation of eligibility applied by the Commission and has insisted that the Commission should demonstrate eligibility and performance in public financial management in a more explicit, formalised and structured manner (SR 2/2005, AR 2009).
Sodišče je večkrat ocenilo dinamično razlago meril za upravičenost, ki jo uporablja Komisija, in vztrajalo, da mora Komisija upravičenost in uspešnost upravljanja javnih financ dokazati na bolj izrazit, formaliziran in strukturiran način (posebno poročilo 2/2005, letno poročilo 2009).
The Court has repeatedly confirmed that an inheritance involving a transfer to one or more persons of assets left by the deceased is a movement of capital within the meaning of Article 63 TFEU, except in cases where its constituent elements are confined within a single Member State.
Sodišče je večkrat potrdilo, da dediščina, ki vključuje prenos premoženja, ki ga zapusti umrli, na eno ali več oseb, pomeni pretok kapitala v smislu člena  63 PDEU, razen v zadevah, v katerih so sestavni elementi dediščine omejeni znotraj ene države članice.
The Court has repeatedly held that Article 6 applies to the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings10 and that a suspect must be offered the assistance of a lawyer at the initial stages of police questioning11 and as soon as he is deprived of his liberty, irrespective of any questioning12.
Sodišče je večkrat odločilo, da se člen 6 uporablja za predhodni postopek kazenskega postopka10 ter da je treba osumljencu ponuditi pomoč odvetnika v začetnih fazah policijskega zaslišanja11 in takoj, ko mu je odvzeta prostost, ne glede na kakršno koli zaslišanje12.
The Court has repeatedly held that the concept of pay within the meaning of the second paragraph of ex-Article 119 of the EC Treaty encompasses all benefits in cash or in kind, present or future, provided they are paid, albeit indirectly by the employer to the worker in connection with his employment.19
Sodišče je večkrat razsodilo, da pojem plačila v smislu drugega odstavka prejšnjega člena 119 Pogodbe ES vključuje vse dajatve v denarju ali naravi, sedanje ali prihodnje, če jih delodajalec, četudi posredno, plača delavcu v zvezi z njegovo zaposlitvijo.19
The Court has repeatedly ruled on the linkage of this Directive to national transposition arrangements.
Večkrat se je izreklo o povezavi med to direktivo in nacionalnimi predpisi, ki jo prenašajo.
The Court has ruled against most of these Member States for non-communication.
Sodišče je zaradi nesporočanja razsodilo proti večini teh držav članic.
The Court has ruled in this connection that in all circumstances taxes and duties with the essential characteristics of VAT, even if not identical to it in every respect, must be considered to affect the circulation of goods and services16.
Sodišče je v zvezi s tem razsodilo, da je treba davke in dajatve z bistvenimi značilnostmi DDV šteti kot davke, ki vplivajo na pretok blaga in storitev podobno kot DDV, četudi mu niso v prav vsakem pogledu enaki16.
The Court has specified that "there is, in this context nothing in the wording of Article 141(1) EC to suggest that the applicability of that provision is limited to situations in which men and women work for the same employer".
Sodišče je opredelilo, da „v tem smislu besedilo člena 141(1) ES v ničemer ne omenja, da je uporabnost te določbe omejena na situacije, ko moški in ženske delajo za istega delodajalca“.
The Court has specified that Article 141(1) lays down the principle that equal work or work of equal value must be remunerated in the same way, whether it is performed by a man or a woman.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da člen 141(1) določa načelo, da mora biti enako delo ali delo enake vrednosti plačano na enak način, ne glede na to, ali ga opravlja moški ali ženska.
The court has stressed on several occasions that whether a material is a waste or not depends on the specific factual circumstances, and that therefore the decision must be taken by the competent authority on a case by case basis.
Sodišče je večkrat poudarilo, da je dejstvo, ali je material odpadek ali ne, odvisno od posebnih dejanskih okoliščin, in da mora zato pristojni organ sprejeti odločitev na podlagi posameznih primerov.
The Court has stressed that Article 141 (as it had previously in the case of ex-Article 119 of the EC Treaty) forms part of the social objectives of the Community, which is not merely an Economic Union but is at the same time intended, by common action, to ensure social progress and seek constant improvements in living and working conditions.
Sodišče je poudarilo, da člen 141 (kot je to storilo v primeru prejšnjega člena 119 Pogodbe ES) predstavlja del socialnih ciljev Skupnosti, ki ni zgolj gospodarska zveza, temveč je njen namen obenem s skupnim delovanjem zagotavljati socialni napredek in iskati stalne izboljšave na področju življenjskih in delovnih pogojev.
The Court has stressed that the rationale of Article 3(1) is to ensure free circulation throughout the internal market for all such media, and therefore it is necessary to limit tobacco advertising therein to those magazines and periodicals which are not intended for the general public (the fourth recital of the Directive).
Sodišče je poudarilo, da je osnovno načelo člena 3(1) zagotoviti prosto razpošiljanje vseh takih medijev na celotnem območju notranjega trga in je zato treba omejiti oglaševanje tobaka v njih na tiste revije in publikacije periodičnega tiska, ki niso namenjene širši javnosti (četrta uvodna izjava Direktive).
The Court has thus, for example, considered that activities performed by members of a religious or philosophic community5 could constitute an economic activity as could activities carried out by an amateur sport association6.
Sodišče je tako na primer ugotovilo, da bi se lahko za gospodarsko dejavnost štele dejavnosti, ki jih opravljajo pripadniki verske ali filozofske skupnosti5, ali dejavnosti, ki jih izvaja amatersko športno društvo6.
The Court has underlined several times that these inspections must be suitable for achieving the objectives pursued without restricting this freedom any more than necessary3, in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
Sodišče je namreč večkrat poudarilo, da morajo biti ti nadzori ob upoštevanju sorazmernosti sposobni dosegati zastavljene cilje, ne da bi to svobodo omejili bolj, kot je potrebno3.
The Court has yet to annul a measure for breach of subsidiarity.
Sodišče mora še razveljaviti ukrep za kršitev načela subsidiarnosti.
The Court has, since 1970 (since its judgement in Defrenne I)8, developed its caselaw on equal pay by clarifying the scope of ex-Article 119 of the EC Treaty as well as of Directive 75/117/EEC.
Sodišče je od leta 1970 (od sodbe v Defrenne I)8 razvijalo sodno prakso o enakem plačilu in razjasnilo področje uporabe prejšnjega člena 119 Pogodbe ES, kot tudi Direktive 75/117/EGS.
The court having jurisdiction pursuant to this Article shall decide on the admissibility of the third party notice.
Sodišče, ki je pristojno po tem členu, odloči o dopustnosti obvestitve drugega.
The court hearing the action shall, in any event, apply Article 26 28 of this Regulation;
Sodišče, ki vodi postopek, v vsakem primeru uporabi člen 2826 te uredbe;
The Court held in Jaeger that missed minimum daily rest periods should be taken immediately after the extended work shift ends and in any event before the next work period begins (‘immediate compensatory rest’).
Sodišče je v sodbi Jaeger odločilo, da je treba zamujeni minimalni dnevni počitek nadomestiti takoj po koncu podaljšanega delavnika in v vsakem primeru pred začetkom naslednjega delovnega obdobja („takojšnji nadomestni počitek“).
The Court held that an adequacy decision was conditional on a Commission finding that — in the non-EU country concerned — there is a level of protection of personal data that, while not necessarily identical, is ‘essentially equivalent’ to that guaranteed in the EU by virtue of the Directive, as read in the light of the Charter.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je sklep o ustreznosti odvisen od ugotovitve Komisije, da v zadevni državi nečlanici EU obstaja raven varstva osebnih podatkov, ki ni nujno enaka, je pa „v bistvu enakovredna“ ravni varstva, ki je zagotovljena v EU na podlagi direktive, kot se razlaga ob upoštevanju Listine.
The Court held that Article 5 of the Directive, interpreted in the light of Article 49 EC, did not preclude the use of such a system as an appropriate measure in the event of failure to comply with the Directive.
Sodišče je menilo, da člen 5 Direktive, razložen ob upoštevanju člena 49 ES, ne nasprotuje uporabi takega sistema kot ustreznega ukrepa v primeru neupoštevanja Direktive.
The Court held that in the absence of harmonisation of the national mechanisms for recovery of uncontested claims, the rules implementing national order for payment procedures are a matter for the national legal order, in accordance with the principle of the procedural autonomy of the Member States, on condition, however, that they are no less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (principle of equivalence) and do not make it in practice impossible or excessively difficult to exercise the rights conferred on consumers by European Union law (principle of effectiveness).26
Sodišče je menilo, da kadar nacionalni mehanizmi za izterjavo nespornih dolgov niso usklajeni, pravila za izvedbo nacionalnih postopkov izdaje plačilnega naloga spadajo v nacionalni pravni red držav članic na podlagi načela njihove postopkovne samostojnosti, vendar pod pogojem, da niso manj ugodna od tistih, ki urejajo podobne položaje v nacionalnem pravu (načelo enakovrednosti), in da v praksi ne onemogočajo ali čezmerno otežujejo izvajanja pravic, ki jih potrošniku podeljuje pravo Unije (načelo učinkovitosti)26.
The Court held that it was not competent to deal with the case and declared it inadmissible.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da ni pristojno za obravnavo zadeve, in je tožbo razglasilo za nedopustno.
The Court held that Member States must, under certain conditions, allow the partial taking-up of the profession on request of the professional.
Sodišče je trdilo, da morajo države članice pod določenimi pogoji strokovnjaku na zahtevo omogočiti delno opravljanje poklica.
The court held that petroleum coke could not be classified as a production residue as the production of coke is the result of a technical choice, specifically intended for use as a fuel.
Sodišče je menilo, da se naftnega koksa ne da uvrstiti med ostanke proizvodnje, saj je proizvodnja koksa rezultat tehnične odločitve, posebej namenjene za uporabo materiala kot goriva.
The Court held that the 2000 Safe Harbour Decision did not contain sufficient findings by the Commission on limits of access by US public authorities to data transferred under the decision, and on the existence of effective legal protection against such interference.
Ugotovilo je, da odločba o varnem pristanu iz leta 2000 ni vsebovala zadostnih ugotovitev Komisije o omejitvah v zvezi z dostopom javnih organov ZDA do podatkov, prenesenih v skladu z odločbo, in o obstoju učinkovitega sodnega varstva pred takim posegom.
The Court held that the Commission should have examined the measures granted by the Walloon Region and by Brussels South Charleroi Airport together and should have applied the private investor principle to the measures adopted by the Walloon Region, since there were close economic links binding these two entities.
Sodišče je menilo, da bi morala Komisija ukrepe, ki sta jih priznala regija Valonija in Brussels South Charleroi Airport, proučiti skupaj ter bi morala za ukrepe, ki jih je sprejela regija Valonija, uporabiti načelo zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, ker med obema subjektoma obstajajo tesne gospodarske povezave.
The Court held that the conditions warranting the choice of Article 95 of the EC Treaty as the legal basis were met.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da so bili pogoji, ki upravičujejo izbiro člena 95 Pogodbe ES kot pravne podlage, doseženi.
The Court held that the Council made an error of assessment in refusing access to one of the negotiating directives it had adopted.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da je Svet naredil napako pri presoji, ko je zavrnil dostop do ene od pogajalskih smernic, ki jih je sprejel.
The Court held that the Framework Decision on the EAW was fully compatible with the Charter.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da je Okvirni sklep o evropskem nalogu za prijetje v celoti skladen z Listino.
The Court held that the situation of a Union citizen who was born in a Member State other than that of his or her nationality and has not made use of the right to freedom of movement cannot, for that reason alone, be assimilated to a purely internal situation, thereby depriving that national of the benefit in the host Member State of the provisions of Community law on freedom of movement.
Sodišče je menilo, da položaj državljana Unije, ki je bil rojen v državi članici, ki ni država članica njegovega državljanstva, in ni uporabil pravice do prostega gibanja, samo zaradi tega razloga ne more biti enakovreden popolnoma notranjemu položaju, zaradi česar ta državljan v državi članici gostiteljici ne more koristiti določb prava Skupnosti o prostem gibanju.
The Court held that ‘sickness’ was not similar to ‘disability’ and went on to explain that ‘disability’, in the sense of the Directive, had to be given a uniform interpretation.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da „bolezen“ ni primerljiva z „invalidnostjo“ in nadalje pojasnilo, da je treba „invalidnost“ v smislu Direktive razlagati enotno.
The Court held that ‘the concept of disability must be understood as referring to a limitation which results from physical, mental or psychological impairments and which hinders the participation of the person concerned in professional life’.
Sodišče je poudarilo, da je „treba pojem invalidnost razumeti tako, da gre za omejitev, ki izhaja predvsem iz fizičnega, mentalnega ali duševnega poslabšanja in ki ovira udeležbo zadevne osebe v poklicnem življenju“.
The Court held that, ‘[s]ince the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Charter must (…) be complied with where national legislation falls within the scope of European Union law, situations cannot exist which are covered in that way by European Union law without those fundamental rights being applicable.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da „[k]er je […] treba, kadar nacionalna ureditev spada na področje uporabe prava Unije, spoštovati temeljne pravice, ki jih zagotavlja Listina, ne morejo obstajati primeri, v katerih nacionalna ureditev spada na področje uporabe prava Unije, ne da bi se uporabljale te temeljne pravice.
The Court however maintained the effects of the Regulation until the adoption, within a reasonable period of time, of a new regulation founded on appropriate legal bases.
Vendar je Sodišče ohranilo učinke Uredbe, dokler ne bo – v razumnem roku – sprejeta nova uredba, ki bo temeljila na primerni pravni podlagi.
The Court however maintained the effects of the Regulation until the adoption, within a reasonable period of time, of a new regulation founded on appropriate legal bases.
Vendar je Sodišče ohranilo učinke Uredbe, in sicer do sprejetja, v razumnem roku, nove uredbe, temelječe na primerni pravni podlagi.
The Court imposed penalty payments against Belgium,30 the Czech Republic,31 Luxembourg32 and Sweden33 but it dismissed the claim of the Commission against Germany.34
Sodišče je plačilo kazni naložilo Belgiji30, Češki republiki31, Luksemburgu32 in Švedski33, ovrglo pa je zahtevek Komisije za plačilo zoper Nemčijo34.
The court in which proceedings are pending pursuant to Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (2), 10 or 11 shall also have jurisdiction to rule on a counterclaim if it falls within the scope of this Regulation.
Sodišče, pred katerim teče postopek v skladu s členom 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9(2), 10 ali 11, je pristojno tudi za odločanje o nasprotni tožbi, če ta spada na področje uporabe te uredbe.