natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Quarterly report on real expenditure - Item 1004
Četrtletno poročilo o porabi sredstev – postavka 1004
Quarterly reporting could also be perceived as a regulatory incentive for investors to focus on the short-term performance of companies rather than taking a longer-term view.
Četrtletno poročanje se lahko razume tudi kot regulativna spodbuda za vlagatelje, da se osredotočijo na kratkoročno in ne na dolgoročno poslovanje družb.
Quarterly statistics on Community job vacancies
Statistika o prostih delovnih mestih
Quarterly statistics on Community job vacancies
Četrtletni statistični podatki glede prostih delovnih mest v Skupnosti
Quarterly statistics on job vacancies
Statistika o prostih delovnih mestih
Quarterly updates shall only be taken into account in respect of applicants who have not already been identified as applicants who could be relocated in accordance with point 3 of annex IV.
Posodobljena četrtletna poročila se upoštevajo samo glede prosilcev, ki še niso bili uvrščeni med prosilce, ki bi lahko bili premeščeni v skladu s točko 3 Priloge IV.
Quasi equity investments can be structured as debt, typically unsecured and subordinated and in some cases convertible into equity, or as preferred equity;
Naložbe navideznega lastniškega kapitala so lahko strukturirane kot dolg, navadno nezavarovan in podrejen, in jih je mogoče v nekaterih primerih preoblikovati v lastniški kapital, ali kot prednostni lastniški kapital;
Quasi peak
Navidezna temenska vrednost
Quasi-fiscal losses of the power sector are estimated at around 4.5 percent of GDP.
Kvazifiskalne izgube sektorja električne energije so ocenjene na približno 4,5 odstotka BDP.
Quasi-peak detector – 120 kHz bandwidth
Navidezno temenski detektor – 120 kHz pasovna širina
Quassin
kvasin
Quaternary ammonium salts and hydroxides; lecithins and other phosphoaminolipids, whether or not chemically defined
Kvarterne amonijeve soli in hidroksidi; lecitini in drugi fosfoaminolipidi, kemično določeni ali ne
Qudra – Resilience for Syrian refugees, IDPs and host communities in response to the Syrian and Iraqi crises
Qudra – odpornost za sirske begunce, notranje razseljene osebe in gostiteljske skupnosti v odziv na krizo v Siriji in Iraku
Queen scallop (Chalamys spp.)
Kraljevska pokrovača (Chlamys spp.)
Queen scallop (Chlamys spp.)
Kraljevska pokrovača (Chlamys spp.)
Queenfishes
kraljevi trnoboki
QUENTIN, Francois (Chair) (FR), Chairman of the Board of Directors of HUAWEI France and member of the HUAWEI Group Advisory Council, member of an Advisory Group to the Prime Minister Office;
QUENTIN, Francois (predsednik) (FR), predsednik upravnega odbora HUAWEI Francija in član svetovalnega sveta skupine HUAWEI, član svetovalne skupine za urad predsednika vlade;
Quest for stronger stakeholder involvement
Nujnost močnejše vključitve zainteresiranih strani
Quest for stronger stakeholder involvement
Nujnost večje vključitve zainteresiranih strani
QUESTION
VPRAŠANJE
Question 1
1. vprašanje
Question 1 Do you think that the abolition of administrative formalities such as legalisation and the apostille would solve the problems encountered by citizens?
Vprašanje 1 Ali menite, da bi se z odpravo upravnih formalnosti, kot sta legalizacija in potrditev z žigom Apostille, rešile težave, s katerimi se srečujejo državljani?
Question 1) Do you think that it is appropriate not to create a separate Framework for Innovation and that the new possibilities for State aid target selected innovation-related activities?
Vprašanje 1) Ali menite, da je primerno, če se ločeni okvir za inovacije ne oblikuje in se nove možnosti za državno pomoč usmerijo v izbrane dejavnosti, povezane z inovacijami?
Question 10 What do you think of the possibility of citizens choosing the applicable law?
Vprašanje 10 Kaj menite o možnosti državljanov, da izberejo pravo, ki se uporabi v konkretnem primeru?
Question 10) Do you think that other types of State aid apart from those currently granted in respect of risk capital are required in order to help European SMEs grow beyond the start-up phase?
Vprašanje 10) Ali menite, da so glede na rizični kapital poleg trenutno dodeljenih pomoči potrebne tudi druge oblike državne pomoči za rast evropskih malih in srednje velikih podjetij po začetni fazi?
Question 10.1: What is your opinion on the real added value of the existing transhipment procedure in the current Overseas Association Decision?
Vprašanje 10.1: Kaj menite o resnični dodani vrednosti obstoječega postopka pretovarjanja v sedanjem Sklepu o pridružitvi čezmorskih držav?
Question 10.2: How could the OCT-EC association be adapted to better promote the development of transport (air, road and harbour) infrastructure?
Vprašanje 10.2: Kako se lahko pridružitev ČDO-ES prilagodi za boljše spodbujanje razvoja prometne infrastrukture (letalske, cestne in pristaniške)?
Question 10.3: Do you have suggestions regarding other ways to help make well-developed but under-utilised harbour infrastructure in OCTs more competitive?
Vprašanje 10.3: Ali imate predloge glede drugih načinov za povečanje konkurenčnosti dobro razvite, a premalo uporabljene pristaniške infrastrukture v ČDO?
Question 10:
Vprašanje 10:
QUESTION 10: Are there any legal or regulatory barriers at national or EU level that need to be overcome for the market introduction of your application?
VPRAŠANJE 10: Ali obstajajo kakršne koli pravne ali ureditvene ovire na nacionalni ravni ali ravni EU, ki jih je treba premagati zaradi uvedbe vaše aplikacije na trg?
Question 10: Do you agree that the attachment should be limited to a specific amount?
Vprašanje 10: Ali se strinjate, da mora biti zaplemba omejena na določen znesek?
Question 10: If Article 11 of the Directive is deleted, should the four steps outlined above be implemented in a modernised Directive?
Vprašanje 10: Če se člen 11 Direktive črta, ali bi bilo treba v posodobljeni direktivi izvajati štiri zgoraj navedene korake?
Question 10: In your experience, does the existence of several grounds of jurisdiction result in “rush to court”?
Vprašanje 10: Ali glede na vaše izkušnje obstoj več temeljev pristojnosti povzroči „hitenje na sodišče“?
Question 10: Should the application of the reserved portion of the estate be maintained where the law designated by the conflict rule does not recognise the principle or defines its scope differently?
Vprašanje 10: Ali je treba ohraniti uporabo nujnega deleža, če pravo, določeno s kolizijskim pravilom, tega instituta ne pozna ali njegovo področje uporabe drugače opredeljuje?
Question 10: There is no doubt that UTPs have an adverse effect on the functioning of the single market, since they significantly restrict the opportunities for small and medium-sized operators to make their mark.
10. vprašanje: nepoštene trgovinske prakse nedvomno škodljivo vplivajo na delovanje enotnega trga, saj znatno omejujejo možnosti malih in srednje velikih akterjev, da se uveljavijo na trgu.
Question 10: To be more incisive, which means of promotion should be used?
Vprašanje 10: Kakšni bi morali biti načini promocije, da bi bili prodornejši?
Question 10: Which other measures at EU level do you propose to increase the transparency of debtors’ assets ?
Vprašanje 10: Katere druge ukrepe na ravni EU predlagate za večjo preglednost dolžnikovega premoženja?
Question 11
Vprašanje 11
Question 11 In addition to automatic recognition and recognition based on the harmonisation of conflict-of-law rules, do you think that there are other solutions which could provide a response to the crossborder effects of legal situations linked to civil status?
Vprašanje 11 Ali menite, da bi se lahko poleg priznavanja listin po uradni dolžnosti in priznavanja listin, ki temelji na uskladitvi kolizijskih pravil, odzvali na pravne čezmejne učinke pravnih statusov, povezanih z osebnim stanjem, tudi z drugimi rešitvami?
Question 11) Do you think that these provisions would produce the expected effects in terms of encouraging SMEs to launch innovative products in the market?
Vprašanje 11) Ali menite, da bi te določbe pripeljale do pričakovanih učinkov, kar zadeva spodbujanje MSP, da uvedejo inovativne izdelke na trg?
Question 11:
Vprašanje 11:
Question 11: Do you believe that the grounds of jurisdiction should be revised?
Vprašanje 11: Ali menite, da bi morali opraviti revizijo temeljev pristojnosti?
Question 11: Do you consider that the banks should be paid for the execution of an Attachment Order?
Vprašanje 11: Ali menite, da morajo biti banke plačane za izvršitev naloga za zaplembo?
Question 11: How should the Community’s promotion of the sustainable development of the OCTs relate to their actual vulnerability as micro-island economies?
Vprašanje 11: Kako bi morala Skupnost spodbujati trajnostni razvoj ČDO glede na njihovo dejansko ranljivost kot malih otoških gospodarstev?
Question 11: Should specific conflict rules be adopted for trusts?
Vprašanje 11: Ali je treba sprejeti posebna kolizijska pravila na področju skladov?
Question 11: UTP regulation that has been adopted in some Member States has so far not delivered satisfactory results.
11. vprašanje: zakonodaja o nepoštenih trgovinskih praksah, ki so jo sprejele nekatere države članice, do zdaj ni prinesla zadovoljivih rezultatov.
Question 11: Would it be appropriate to provide more space for the indication of origin of the product and what criteria should be used to decide?
Vprašanje 11: Bi bilo primerno zagotoviti vidnejše mesto za navedbo izvora proizvoda in kakšna bi morala biti merila za to?
Question 11: Would you support extending the benefits of the Directive to graduates from academic training who wish to complete a period of remunerated supervised practical experience in the profession abroad?
Vprašanje 11: Ali bi podprli razširitev ugodnosti Direktive na diplomante z akademsko izobrazbo, ki želijo v tujini opraviti nadzorovano obdobje plačanih praktičnih izkušenj v svojem poklicu?
Question 12) Is there evidence that these provisions should be extended to large companies?
Vprašanje 12) Ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da je treba te določbe razširiti na velika podjetja?
Question 12:
Vprašanje 12:
Question 12: Do you consider that the harmonisation of the jurisdiction rules should be reinforced and that Article 7 of Regulation No. 2201/2003 should be deleted, or at least limited to cases where no EU citizens are involved?
Vprašanje 12: Ali menite, da bi morali okrepiti usklajevanje pravil o pristojnosti in zbrisati člen 7 Uredbe št. 2201/2003 ali ga vsaj omejiti na zadeve, kjer niso vpleteni državljani EU?
Question 12: How urgent it is to adopt a dedicated law depends, among other things, on the scale of UTP use, but this varies from country to country.
12. vprašanje: kako nujno je sprejeti ustrezno zakonodajo je med drugim odvisno od razširjenosti uporabe nepoštenih trgovinskih praks, ki pa se med državami razlikuje.
Question 12: How urgent it is to adopt a dedicated law depends, among other things, on the scale of UTP use, but this varies from country to country.
12. vprašanje: kako nujno je sprejeti ustrezno zakonodajo, je med drugim odvisno od razširjenosti nepoštenih trgovinskih praks, ki pa se med državami razlikuje.
Question 12: How urgent it is to adopt a dedicated law depends, among other things, on the scale of UTP use, but this varies from country to country.
12. vprašanje: kako nujno je sprejeti ustrezno zakonodajo, je med drugim odvisno od razširjenosti uporabe nepoštenih trgovinskih praks, ki pa se med državami razlikuje.
Question 12: If an attachment order is to extend to several accounts, how should the sum to be seized be allocated among each of the accounts?
Vprašanje 12: Če nalog za zaplembo obsega več računov, kako se znesek, ki ga je treba zaseči, porazdeli med vsakega od računov?
Question 12: What is your opinion on the establishment of an index to measure the relative vulnerability of the OCTs, allowing comparison not only between the OCTs, but also with other countries and territories?
Vprašanje 12: Kaj menite o oblikovanju kazalnika za merjenje relativne ranljivosti ČDO z omogočanjem primerjave ne le med ČDO, ampak tudi z drugimi državami in ozemlji?
Question 12: Which of the two options for the introduction of an alert mechanism for health professionals within the IMI system do you prefer?
Vprašanje 12: Katera od obeh možnosti za vpeljavo mehanizma opozarjanja za zdravstvene delavce znotraj sistema IMI vam je ljubša?
Question 12: Would it be appropriate to use brands as a promotion tool in the external market and what criteria should be used to decide?
Vprašanje 12: Bi bilo primerno uporabiti znamke kot orodje za promocijo na zunanjem trgu in kakšna bi morala biti merila za to?
Question 13 : What is stopping the presentation and implementation of Multi-country programmes?
Vprašanje 13: Katere so ovire za predložitev in izvajanje programov „za več držav“?
Question 13) How would you regard specific support for innovation intermediaries which merge or develop a joint venture to reach critical mass in a technological field of specialisation?
Vprašanje 13) Kako bi ocenili posebno podporo za posrednike za inovacije, ki združujejo ali razvijajo skupno podjetje, da bi dosegli kritično maso na tehnološkem področju specializacije?
Question 13:
Vprašanje 13:
Question 13: How should the attachment of joint and nominee accounts be dealt with?
Vprašanje 13: Kako je treba obravnavati zaplembo skupnih in imenskih računov?
Question 13: In view of the exposure of many OCTs to natural disasters, how should Disaster Risk Reduction be included in future OCT-EU relations?
Vprašanje 13: Glede to, da so mnogi ČDO izpostavljeni naravnim nesrečam, kako bi moralo biti zmanjšanje tveganja nesreč vključeno v prihodnje odnose ČDO-ES?
Question 13: What are the arguments for and against introducing a possibility of prorogation in divorce cases?
Vprašanje 13: Kakšni so argumenti za in proti uvedbi možnosti dogovora v zadevah razveze?
Question 13: Which of the two options outlines above do you prefer?
Vprašanje 13: Katera od zgoraj opisanih možnosti vam je ljubša?
Question 14
Vprašanje 14
Question 14) Is there evidence that the recruitment by SMEs of other types of highly skilled personnel should be also aided?
Vprašanje 14) Ali obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da bi bilo lahko tudi zaposlovanje drugih vrst visoko usposobljenega osebja s strani MSP upravičeno pomoči?
Question 14:
Vprašanje 14:
Question 14: Do any other types of programmes and/or tools need to be developed?
Vprašanje 14: Ali bi bilo treba razviti še druge vrste programov in/ali orodij?
Question 14: How could the OCT-EC association be adapted to take greater account of the OCTs’ diversity without increasing the administrative burden for the OCTs and the Commission?
Vprašanje 14: Kako bi se lahko pridružitev ČDO-ES prilagodila, da bi upoštevala raznolikost ČDO in pri tem ne bi povečala upravnega bremena za ČDO in Komisijo?
Question 14: Is it desirable to determine a single forum in matters of succession?
Vprašanje 14: Ali je zaželeno, da se določi edini forum na področju dedovanja?
Question 14: Should prorogation be limited to certain jurisdictions?
Vprašanje 14: Ali bi bilo treba dogovor omejiti na nekatere pristojnosti?
Question 14: Should the question whether amounts are exempt from execution be dealt with ex officio when issuing/executing the attachment or should the onus be on the debtor to object on this ground?
Vprašanje 14: Ali je treba vprašanje, ali so zneski izvzeti iz izvršbe, obravnavati po uradni dolžnosti, ko se izda/izvrši zaplemba, ali mora biti breme na strani dolžnika, da na podlagi tega ugovarja?
Question 14: The EESC is convinced that new harmonisation measures should be adopted at EU level (see points 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4).
14. vprašanje: EESO meni, da bi bilo treba na ravni EU sprejeti nove usklajevalne ukrepe (glej točke 4.2, 4.3 in 4.4).
Question 14: Would you support a three-phase approach to modernisation of the minimum training requirements under the Directive consisting of the following phases:
Vprašanje 14: Bi podprli trifazni pristop k posodobitvi minimalnih zahtev glede usposobljenosti iz Direktive, ki bi zajemal naslednje faze:
Question 15 : How can the selection and implementation of programmes be simplified and improved?
Vprašanje 15: Kako poenostaviti in izboljšati izbiranje ter izvajanje programov?
Question 15) Should the Commission adopt specific rules for cases where a researcher chooses not to return to his/her home university or where the university no longer intends to hire him/her back?
Vprašanje 15) Bi morala Komisija sprejeti posebna pravila za primere, če se raziskovalec odloči, da se ne bo vrnil na svojo domačo univerzo ali za primer, ko ga univerza ne namerava vzeti več nazaj?
Question 15:
Vprašanje 15:
Question 15: A certain positive effect of regulation is already apparent (see above).
15. vprašanje: nekateri pozitivni učinki regulacije so že vidni (glej zgoraj).
Question 15: Do you agree that the exequatur procedure should be abolished for the attachment order?
Vprašanje 15: Ali se strinjate, da je v zvezi z nalogom za zaplembo treba odpraviti postopek priznanja izvršljivosti tuje sodne odločbe?
Question 15: Might the heirs be allowed to proceed in the courts of a Member State other than the one designated by a principal rule on conflict of jurisdiction?
Vprašanje 15: Ali lahko dedičem dovolimo, da začnejo postopek pred sodiščem v državi članici, ki ni tista, ki jo določa morebitno glavno pravilo o sporu o pristojnosti?
Question 15: Once professionals seek establishment in a Member State other than that in which they acquired their qualifications, they should demonstrate to the host Member State that they have the right to exercise their profession in the home Member State.
Vprašanje 15: Ko strokovnjaki zaprosijo za opravljanje dejavnosti v državah članicah, v katerih niso pridobili svojih kvalifikacij, morajo državi članici dokazati, da imajo pravico do opravljanja svojega poklica v matični državi članici.
Question 15: What should be the formal requirements for the parties’ prorogation agreement?
Vprašanje 15: Kakšne naj bi bile formalne zahteve za dogovor strank o pristojnosti?
Question 16 : Participants are invited to raise any questions concerning the information and promotion policy for agricultural products that have not been covered in this document.
Vprašanje 16: Sodelujoči lahko izpostavijo katero koli vprašanje o politiki informiranja o kmetijskih proizvodih in njihove promocije, ki ga ta dokument ne obravnava.
Question 16) What definition of cluster/clustering activities should be followed and what criteria should be used to distinguish clusters from the broader category of innovation intermediaries?
Vprašanje 16) Katere opredelitve skupine/povezovalnih dejavnosti bi se morale upoštevati in katera merila bi se morala uporabiti za razlikovanje skupin širše kategorije posrednikov za inovacije?
Question 16:
Vprašanje 16:
Question 16: How should an attachment order be transmitted from the issuing court to the bank where the account is situated?
Vprašanje 16: Kako je treba prenesti nalog za zaplembo od sodišča, ki ga je izdalo, do banke, kjer je račun?
Question 16: Should it be possible to request a transfer of a case to the court of another Member State?
Vprašanje 16: Ali bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se lahko zahteva prenos zadeve na sodišče druge države članice?
Question 16: Where succession proceedings are pending in a Member State, should it be possible to apply to the courts in another Member State where the property is located for provisional and precautionary measures?
Vprašanje 16: Ali je med tekočim zapuščinskim postopkom v eni državi članici treba priznati možnost, da se zaprosi sodišče v drugi državi članici, kjer se nahaja dedovano premoženje, za sprejetje začasnih in zavarovalnih ukrepov?
Question 16: Would you support clarifying the minimum training requirements for doctors, nurses and midwives to state that the conditions relating to the minimum years of training and the minimum hours of training apply cumulatively?
Vprašanje 16: Ali podpirate razjasnitev minimalnih zahtev usposobljenosti za zdravnike, medicinske sestre in babice, da bi poudarili kumulativno uporabo pogojev glede najmanjšega števila let in ur usposabljanja?
Question 17) Do you think that State aid should be allowed to promote European centres of excellence?
Vprašanje 17) Ali menite, da bi morala biti državna pomoč dodeljena za spodbujanje evropskih centrov odličnosti?
Question 17:
Vprašanje 17:
Question 17: Do you agree that Member States should make notifications as soon as a new program of education and training is approved?
Vprašanje 17: Ali se strinjate, da države članice izdajo uradna obvestila, takoj ko je odobren nov program izobraževanja in usposabljanja?
Question 17: Do you agree that upon receipt of an attachment, it should be the duty of the banks to inform the enforcement authority whether and to what extent an attachment has successfully secured the monies liable to be paid by the debtor to the creditor?
Vprašanje 17: Ali se strinjate, da mora po prejemu zaplembe banka obvestiti organ pregona, ali in v kakšnem obsegu je zaplemba uspešno zaščitila denarna sredstva, ki jih mora dolžnik plačati upniku?
Question 17: Should the future Community instrument contain provisions allowing a case to be transferred from a court in one Member State to a court in another Member State and, if so, under what conditions?
Vprašanje 17: Ali je treba v prihodnji instrument Skupnosti vnesti določbe, ki bodo dovoljevale prenos postopka sodišča ene države članice na sodišče druge države članice, in če je odgovor pritrdilen, pod katerimi pogoji?
Question 17: What should be the connecting factors to establish whether a case can be transferred to another Member State?
Vprašanje 17: Katere naj bodo navezne okoliščine, da se ugotovi, ali se zadeva lahko prenese v drugo državo članico?
Question 18) Are additional criteria needed to avoid State aid being fragmented and to encourage the concentration of resources in a limited number of poles of excellence?
Vprašanje 18) Ali so potrebna dodatna merila, da se prepreči razdrobitev državne pomoči in da se spodbudi koncentracija sredstev v omejenem številu centrov odličnosti?
Question 18:
Vprašanje 18:
Question 18: Do you agree that the threshold of the minimum number of Member States where the medical speciality exists should be lowered from two-fifths to one-third?
Vprašanje 18: Se strinjate, da bi se moral prag najmanjšega števila držav članic, v katerih obstaja zdravniška specializacija, znižati iz dveh petin na eno tretjino?
Question 18: What elements would be relevant in determining the jurisdiction of the courts of the Member States in a situation such as that outlined above?
Vprašanje 18: Kateri elementi bi bili primerni za določitev pristojnosti sodišč držav članic v primeru, kot je zgornji?
Question 18: What safeguards would be necessary to ensure legal certainty and avoid undue delays?
Vprašanje 18: Kateri varovalni ukrepi bi bili nujni za zagotovitev pravne varnosti in izogibanje nepotrebnim zamudam?
Question 18: When and by whom should the debtor be notified formally that an attachment has been granted and taken effect?
Vprašanje 18: Kdaj in kdo mora dolžnika uradno obvestiti, da je bila zaplemba odobrena in začela veljati?
Question 19) What are your views more generally about the need for additional provisions for infrastructure that supports innovation (e.g. in the field of energy, transport etc.)?
Vprašanje 19) Kaj na splošno menite o potrebi dodatnih določb za infrastrukturo, ki podpira inovacije (npr. na področju energetike, prevoza itd.)?
Question 19:
Vprašanje 19:
Question 19: Do you agree that the modernisation of the Directive could be an opportunity for Member States for granting partial exemptions if part of the training has been already completed in the context of another specialist training programme?
Vprašanje 19: Ali se strinjate, da bi posodobitev lahko Direktive državam članicam predstavljala možnost za odobritev delnih oprostitev, če bi bil del usposabljanja že opravljen v okviru drugega specialističnega programa usposabljanja?
Question 19: Should the attachment be revocable or lapse automatically if the creditor does not file the principal action within a specific time period?
Vprašanje 19: Ali se lahko zaplemba prekliče ali avtomatsko preneha veljati, če upnik ne vloži glavnega zahtevka v določenem roku?