natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mr Baráth said that, as of January 2011, the Hungarian ESC had been replaced by a differently-structured organisation – the National Economic and Societal Council – and that it would be useful to include it in the list of organisations appended to the document.
G. BarÁth pa je dejal, da je madžarski ESS januarja 2011 nadomestila organizacija z drugačno strukturo – Nacionalni ekonomsko-družbeni svet –, ki bi jo bilo dobro vključiti v seznam organizacij, ki je priložen dokumentu.
Mr Barón Crespo emphasised that a Constitution or a Treaty was, in any case, no more than an instrument, which could undoubtedly be changed, but which would never be a political programme.
BARÓN CRESPO je poudaril, da je ustava ali pogodba v vsakem primeru le okvir oz. instrument, ki ga je vsekakor mogoče spremeniti in ki nikakor ne more biti politični program.
Mr Barón Crespo went on to say that the discussions and controversies surrounding the word "Constitution" had generally provided several Member States that were unwilling to ratify the Constitutional Treaty, despite the fact that they had signed it, with an excuse to call it into question and undermine it.
BARÓN CRESPO je dejal, da so razprave in polemike o besedi "ustava" na splošno več državam članicam, ki ustavne pogodbe kljub dejstvu, da so jo podpisale, niso želele ratificirati, dale izgovor, da jo postavijo pod vprašaj in raztrgajo na kose.
Mr Barčík
g. BARČÍK
Mr Bassols, representing the Commission's DG External Relations, made a brief statement on the European Commission's Euromed work programme, which was based on a joint action plan adopted in Tampere in November 2006.
Bassols, predstavnik GD za zunanje odnose pri Evropski komisiji, je na kratko predstavil program dela Euromed v okviru Evropske komisije, ki temelji na skupnem akcijskem načrtu, sprejetem novembra 2006 v Tampereju.
Mr Bastian did not support this amendment, which was rejected by 18 votes to 101, with 13 abstentions.
BASTIAN ni podprl amandmaja, ki je bil zavrnjen z 18 glasovi za, 101 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi.
Mr Bastian did not support this amendment, which was rejected by 25 votes to 95, with 20 abstentions.
BASTIAN ni podprl amandmaja, ki je bil zavrnjen s 25 glasovi za, 95 glasovi proti in 20 vzdržanimi glasovi.
Mr Bastian presented the draft opinion, emphasising its continuity with the opinion adopted by the EESC in December of the previous year, to the effect that a reform of the common organisation of the market in sugar was necessary, but that the reform proposed by the Commission went too far and too quickly.
BASTIAN je predstavil mnenje in poudaril, da se navezuje na mnenje, ki ga je EESO sprejel decembra 2004. Potrdil je, da je reforma skupne ureditve trga za sladkor sicer potrebna, vendar gre reforma, ki jo predlaga Komisija, predaleč in prehitro.
Mr Bastian proposed a compromise, which was to insert the phrase permanent and seasonal after 75,000 workers.
BASTIAN je predlagal kompromis, da se v besedilu za 75.000 delavcev vstavi stalnih in sezonskih.
Mr Basáñez Villaluenga (ES-I)
Josep Manuel BASÁÑEZ VILLALUENGA (ES-I)
Mr Bauby (for the rapporteur)
Pierre BAUBY
Mr Baudouin (Cat.
g. Baudouin (int.
Mr Baumann (Cat.
Wolf-Rüdiger BAUMANN (int.
Mr Baumann (DE-Cat.
Wolf-Rüdiger BAUMANN (DE – int.
Mr Becsey would outline the Hungarian EU Council presidency's work programme and priorities.
BECSEY bo predstavil delovni program in prednostne naloge madžarskega predsedovanja Svetu EU.
Mr Bedossa (FR-III) (Rule 62 -  Ms Fusco)
g.BEDOSSA (FR-III) (FUSCO, člen 62)
Mr Bedossa outlined the opinion, noting that it was an EESC contribution to the appraisal of the EU's development policy for Africa.
BEDOSSA je na kratko predstavil mnenje in pojasnil, da predstavlja prispevek EESO k razmisleku o razvojni politiki EU za Afriko.
Mr Beffort
g. BEFFORT
Mr Belarmino Gonçalves Paradela (for Group I)
Belarmino GONÇALVES PARADELA (za I. skupino)
Mr Bence
Jean-Francois BENCE
Mr Bence, Acting director, Directorate B, Consultative Work
BENCE, v.d. direktorja direkcije A za posvetovalno delo
Mr Bence, Acting Director, Directorate B, Consultative Work
BENCE, v.d. direktorja direkcije B za posvetovalno delo
Mr BERGER
BERGER
Mr Berggren (SE-I)
BERGGREN (SE-I)
Mr Berggren (SE-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Back)
Jonas BERGGREN (Stefan BACK, člen 62) (SE-I)
Mr Berggren (SE-I) art.
Jonas BERGGREN (SE-I)(g.
Mr Bergrath (DE-II)
Dirk BERGRATH (DE-II)
Mr Bermejo, head of the Legal Service
BERMEJO, vodja enote, pravna služba
Mr Bernabei (for the rapporteur)
Giannino BERNABEI
Mr Bernabei (for the rapporteur)
Giannino BERNABEI (za poročevalca)
Mr Bernabei (for the rapporteur)
Giannino BERNABEI (za poročevalko)
Mr Bernabei (IT) for the rapporteur
Giannino BERNABEI (IT) (za poročevalca)
Mr Bernard Noël
Bernard NOËL
Mr Bernardo Hernández Bataller, chairman of the EESC Section for the "Single Market, Production and Consumption", as well as Mr Jorge Pegado Liz, chairman of the SMO, and Mr Patrick Venturini, Secretary General of the EESC, sketched the activities of the Committee on Better Regulation since 2000, which had led to the setting up of database dedicated to Self- and Co-Regulation.
Bernardo Hernández Bataller, predsednik strokovne skupine EESO za enotni trg, proizvodnjo in potrošnjo, Jorge Pegado Liz, predsednik OMU, in generalni sekretar EESO Patrick Venturini so predstavili dejavnosti Odbora v zvezi z boljšo pripravo zakonodaje od leta 2000, ki so privedle do oblikovanja podatkovne baze, namenjene samoregulaciji in koregulaciji.
Mr Bernd Dittmann
Bernda DITTMANNA
Mr Bernd Dittmann (Gr.
Bernd DITTMANN (I. sk.
Mr Bernhard GAUSE
Bernhard GAUSE
Mr Bernhard Wisleitner (for Group III)
Bernhard WISLEITNER (za III. skupino)
Mr Bernt FALLENKAMP
Bernt FALLENKAMP
Mr Bielinski (Cat.
Jerzy BIELIŃSKI (PL-kat.
Mr Bielinski (PL-Cat 2)
Jerzy BIELIŃSKI (PL-2. kat.)
Mr Biermann (DE-GRII)
Egbert BIERMANN (DE-II)
Mr Biermann (DE-II)
Egbert BIERMANN (DE-II)
Mr Bigazzi (for the rapporteur)
Alberto BIGAZZI (za poročevalca)
Mr Biot (BE-I)
g. Biot (BE-I)
Mr Bischoff then announced that a meeting to coordinate the participants would be held alongside the July plenary session, and Mr Krawczyk stressed the complexity of holding debates in each of the 28 Member States and the consequent need for proper logistical support; he asked the president to liaise directly with the Commission president on this dossier to avoid the risk of the Committee's institutional role being circumvented.
Nato sta prevzela besedo Gabriele BISCHOFF, ki je sporočila, da bo na julijskem zasedanju organizirana usklajevalna seja za udeležence projekta, in Jacek KRAWCZYK, ki je poudaril neizogibno zapletenost organizacije razprav v vseh 28 državah članicah, zaradi katere je potrebna ustrezna logistična podpora; predsednika je pozval, naj se v zvezi s tem vprašanjem obrne neposredno na predsednika Komisije, da bi se preprečilo tveganje, da bi se obšla institucionalna vloga Odbora.
Mr Bobrowski (PL-II)
Franciszek BOBROWSKI (PL-II)
Mr Bogdan Skotnicki (for the rapporteur)
Bogdan SKOTNICKI (za poročevalca)
Mr Bojidar Danev (Gr.
Bojidar DANEV (I. sk.
Mr Boland
Seamus BOLAND
Mr Boland (IE-GRIII) (Rule 62 § 3 – Mr Jirovec)
Seamus BOLAND (IE-III) (Ludvík JÍROVEC, člen 62(3))
Mr Boland (IE-GRIII) Art.
Seamus BOLAND (IE-III)
Mr Boland (IE-III)
Seamus BOLAND (IE-III)
Mr Boland (IE-III) (Rule 62 – Trantina)
Seamus BOLAND (IE-III) (Pavel TRANTINA, člen 62)
Mr Boland (IE-III) (Rule 62 – Trantina)
Seamus BOLAND (IE-III) (g. TRANTINA, člen 62)
Mr Boldt
BOLDT
Mr Boldt (FI-II)
Mr Boldt (FI – II)
Mr Boldt (FI-III) (Rule 62, Penttinen)
Boldt (Penttinen, člen 62) (FI-III)
Mr Boqvist (for Group I)
Per BOQVIST (za I. skupino)
Mr Bouis
BOUIS
Mr Bouis stressed that this directive would certainly have impact on the health systems of the member states and was worried that it may lead to health inequalities, if no measures were taken.
Poudaril je, da bo ta direktiva nedvomno vplivala na zdravstvene sisteme držav članic, in zaskrbljeno dejal, da bi to lahko privedlo do neenakosti na področju zdravja, če ne bo primernih ukrepov.
Mr Boulnois enquired about the possibility of former members attending EESC meetings.
Boulnois je vprašal, ali se lahko nekdanji člani udeležujejo sej EESO.
Mr Boulnois expressed dismay that only 50 members had paid their membership fee.
Boulnois je bil osupel, ker je članarino plačalo le 50 članov.
Mr Boulnois said that inconsistencies in Europe had more to do with governments' activities than with the way Europe was designed.
Boulnois je dejal, da so neskladnosti v Evropi prej posledica dejavnosti vlad, kot njene zasnove.
Mr Boyle (for Group II)
Charles BOYLE (za II. skupino)
Mr Boyle (Rule 62 Ms McKnight)
BOYLE (člen 62, ga.
Mr Boyle (UK-II)
g. BOYLE (UK-II)
Mr Boyle and Mr Jahier stressed the need to have a final and structured debate by September 2012 to decide on the future of cooperation with the AICESIS and, if necessary, lay down the appropriate procedures.
JAHIER, ki je poudaril potrebo po strukturirani in končni razpravi do septembra 2012, na podlagi katere naj bi sprejeli odločitev o prihodnosti sodelovanja z AICESIS ter po potrebi opredelili njegovo obliko.
Mr Boyle and Mr Jahier then spoke, Mr Jahier insisting on the need for a monitoring report on the application of the proposed measures six months after their adoption.
V razpravo sta se nato vključila še Sandy BOYLE in Luca JAHIER, ki je poudaril, da je treba šest mesecev po sprejetju predlaganih ukrepov pripraviti poročilo o njihovem izvajanju.
Mr Boyle commented on the allocation of the opinion on promoting renewable energy, which at the moment was in the brochure under the TEN section, whereas she thought it should be under the REX section, although it fell within the remit of both sections.
BOYLE je dal pripombo glede uvrstitve mnenja o spodbujanju trajnostnih virov energije, ki je v brošuri trenutno navedeno pod strokovno skupino TEN, po njegovem mnenju pa bi moralo biti pod strokovno skupino REX, čeprav sta zanj pristojni obe strokovni skupini.
Mr Boyle complained that in the revised joint statement of the EU–Turkey JCC there was an additional sentence on Cyprus, which had not been discussed, but had been included at the request of the Turkish delegation.
BOYLE se je pritožil, da je bil v revidirani skupni izjavi skupnega posvetovalnega odbora EU in Turčije dodaten stavek o Cipru, o katerem niso razpravljali, temveč je bil vključen na zahtevo turške delegacije.
Mr Boyle explained that the amendments were tabled in order to include in the opinion an assessment of the Commission and the EEAS communication on the review of the European Neighbourhood policy, which was adopted the day the opinion was voted in the section.
Boyle je pojasnil, da sta bila amandmaja vložena, da bi se v mnenje vključili ocena, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, in sporočilo Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje o evropski sosedski politiki, ki je bilo sprejeto na dan, ko je strokovna skupina glasovala o mnenju.
Mr Boyle gave his support to the draft opinion and informed that no amendments had been tabled at the meeting of the External Relations Section.
BOYLE je podprl osnutek mnenja in povedal, da na seji strokovne skupine za zunanje odnose ni bil vložen noben amandma.
Mr Boyle mentioned the close cooperation with the CoR on this issue and the need for leaders of the Member States to come up with a unified position on such a dramatic subject.
BOYLE je omenil tesno sodelovanje z OR v zvezi s tem vprašanjem in dejal, da morajo voditelji držav članic oblikovati enotno stališče o tem tako dramatičnem dogajanju.
Mr Boyle requested clarification regarding statements which had been made at the Budget Group, in which appropriations earmarked for "institutional obligations" were not to cover expenses regarding organisation of meetings that was the responsibility of the REX section.
BOYLE je zahteval, da se pojasnijo izjave, dane v okviru skupine za proračun, v skladu s katerimi sredstva, dodeljena za institucionalne obveznosti, naj ne bi krila stroškov organizacije sej strokovne skupine REX.
Mr Boyle spoke on comments made to the requests GB CESE 63/2011 and GB CESE 66/2011.
BOYLE se je odzval na pripombe na zahtevka GB CESE 63/2011 in GB CESE 66/2011. G.
Mr Boyle then spoke about the initiatives planned in respect of the EU's Eastern Partnership and Union for the Mediterranean –sensitive ground, given the recent events in Tunisia.
BOYLE je omenil pobude, ki so predvidene na področju vzhodnega partnerstva in Unije za Sredozemlje in so povezane z občutljivimi vprašanji, zlasti z vidika nedavnih dogodkov v Tuniziji.
Mr Boyle until 18 April 2013
Sandy BOYLE (do 18. aprila 2013)
Mr Braghin (IT-I) (Rule 62 – Burani)
BRAGHIN (IT‑I) (člen 62º – Burani)
Mr Braghin (IT-I) (Rule 62-Burani)
BRAGHIN (IT‑I) – Burani, člen 62
Mr Braghin (IT-I) (Rule 62-Burani)
BRAGHIN (IT‑I) – člen 62º  Burani
Mr Braghin (IT-I) (Rule 62; Burani)
BRAGHIN (IT-I) (BURANI, člen 62)
Mr Braghin (IT-I) (Rule 62; Burani)
BRAGHIN (IT-I) (člen 62; Burani)
Mr Braghin moved a procedural motion.
BRAGHIN je postavil vprašanje o pravilnosti postopka.
Mr Braghin presented an amendment that aimed to eliminate the "formal opinion" concept by wording the second part of the Rule as follows:
BRAGHIN je predstavil svoj amandma z namenom odpraviti pojem ''formalno mnenje'', tako da bi drugi del člena vseboval naslednje besedilo:
Mr Braghin questioned whether the Committee could propose amendments to the Treaty and believed that the document being discussed was not typical of the Committee.
BRAGHIN je izrazil dvom, da lahko Odbor predlaga spremembe Pogodbe in menil, da se obravnavani dokument razlikuje od običajnih mnenj Odbora.
Mr Branko Ravnik (SL-III)
Branko RAVNIK (SL-III)
Mr Brendan Burns (rapporteur working alone)
Burns Brendan (samostojni poročevalec)
Mr Brendan Burns (UK - I)
Brendan BURNS (UK-I)
Mr Brendan Burns (UK-I)
Brendan BURNS (UK-I)
Mr Brendan Burns (UK–I)
Brendan BURNS (UK-I)
Mr Brian Curtis (UK-II)
Brian CURTIS (UK-II)
Mr Brian Curtis  (UK-II)
Brian CURTIS (UK-II)
Mr Brichart (FR-I)
Henri BRICHART (FR-I)
Mr Briesch closed the meeting of the annual general assembly and thanked all speakers and members for their participation and contributions.
Briesch je sklenil letni občni zbor in se vsem govornikom in članom zahvalil za udeležbo in prispevke.
Mr Briesch gave a positive account of the structured debates on the "The current state of play in the EU" and "Communicating Europe", which had taken place at the previous plenary session.
BRIESCH je pozitivno ocenil strukturirano razpravo o trenutni situaciji v Evropi in seznanjanju o Evropi, kot se je odvila na zadnjem plenarnem zasedanju.
Mr Briesch pointed out that the trust that had grown among the stakeholders represented in this group was the direct consequence of the legitimacy of each one of them.
BRIESCH je opozoril, da je zaupanje, ki se je razvilo med vsemi akterji, ki so zastopani v skupini, posledica priznanja legitimnosti vsakogar izmed njih.
Mr Briesch specified that this conference would make it possible to compare the best practices adopted by the various Member States for implementing the Lisbon Strategy and added that the summary report presented to the Bureau represented a continuation of the conference's work.
G BRIESCH je pojasnil, da je konferenca predvsem omogočila primerjavo najboljših praks držav članic za zagotovitev izvajanja lizbonske strategije, in dodal, da je zbirno poročilo, predstavljeno predsedstvu, nadaljevanje dela konference.
Mr Briesch suggested that rules on reimbursing travel and meeting expenses could be reviewed at the same time as the Rules of Procedure.
BRIESCH je predlagal, da bi predpise o nadomestilih za potne stroške in sejnine lahko revidirali sočasno z revizijo poslovnika.
Mr Briesch thanked Mr Danusēvičs and noted that former members could indeed draw on all their contacts and networks in order to take the European project forward.
Danusēvičsu in dejal, da bi lahko nekdanji člani dejansko izkoristili svoje stike in mreže za spodbujanje razvoja evropskega projekta.
Mr Briesch thanked Mr Salvatore and said that if the other Bureau members agreed with Mr Salvatore's proposal, he would gladly take on this challenging role.
Salvatoreju in dejal, da bo z veseljem prevzel to zahtevno vlogo, če se drugi člani predsedstva strinjajo s predlogom g.
Mr Briesch thanked the Bureau members, and in particular Mr Salvatore, for their vote of confidence and said that although the task was ambitious he was ready to face the challenges ahead.
Salvatoreju, zahvalil za izkazano zaupanje in dejal, da se je kljub ambiciozni nalogi pripravljen soočiti z izzivi, ki ga čakajo.
Mr Briesch thanked the EESC president and vice-president and opened the general debate.
Briesch se je zahvalil predsedniku in podpredsedniku EESO ter odprl splošno razpravo.
Mr Briesch was presented as the new president of the AFM.
Briesch je bil predstavljen kot novi predsednik združenja.
Mr Briesch, president of the Communication Group, presented a report on Communicating Europe in light of the French and Dutch referendum results – the role of the EESC.
G. BRIESCH, predsednik skupine za obveščanje, je predstavil poročilo na temo »Približevanje Evrope njenim državljanom v luči izidov francoskega in nizozemskega referenduma – vloga EESO«.
Mr Brok believed that it should be possible to draw up a new treaty, a treaty for Europe, that would: (a) include the whole of Part I of the Constitutional Treaty which, in accordance with the wishes of the German presidency of the European Council, should not be subject to any new discussion, and (b) Part II, the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
BROK je s tem v zvezi izrazil mnenje, da bi morala obstajati možnost za pripravo nove pogodbe za Evropo, ki bi v celoti povzela del I Ustavne pogodbe, o katerem ne bi bilo treba znova razpravljati, kar je v skladu z željo nemškega predsedstva EU, ter tudi del II, torej Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Mr Brok confirmed that, from the legal point of view, the new treaty would in all probability have to be agreed by the governments of the 27 Member States at an inter-governmental conference, even if one were to allow for such a conference to be preceded by a convention bringing together MEPs and MPs from the individual Member States, as had been the case with the Constitutional Treaty.
BROK je potrdil, da morajo, gledano s pravnega stališča, v vsakem primeru o novi pogodbi vlade 27 držav članic doseči soglasje na medvladni konferenci, tudi če bi bila pred to konferenco  konvencija, v kateri bi sodelovali poslanci nacionalnih parlamentov in poslanci Evropskega parlamenta, kot je bil primer z Ustavno pogodbo.
Mr Brok nonetheless believed that it would be inadequate to simply limit ourselves to a purely institutional agreement which ignored the significant moves forward made by the Constitutional Treaty in terms of democracy, transparency, effectiveness of EU action, citizen participation in the Union's public life, distribution of competences, subsidiarity or regarding the role of the national parliaments.
BROK je ocenil, da ne zadostuje omejitev na izključno institucionalni sporazum, ki ne bi upošteval doseženega z Ustavno pogodbo v zvezi z demokracijo, preglednostjo, učinkovitostjo delovanja EU, sodelovanjem državljanov v političnem življenju Unije, porazdelitvijo odgovornosti, subsidiranostjo ali vlogo nacionalnih parlamentov.
Mr Brok noted that the European Council had to first establish a clear-cut mandate for the intergovernmental conference, which was no simple matter as this mandate would then have an impact on the future stages of the process.
BROK je opozoril, da mora Evropski svet najprej opredeliti jasno določen mandat za medvladno konferenco, kar ni enostavna naloga, saj bo ta mandat vplival na celotni potek procesa.
Mr Bros (FR-III)
g. BROS (FR-III)
Mr Bros (Gr. III–FR)
BROS (III. sk.
Mr Brunetti, Director, Directorate for Human Resources and Internal Services
BRUNETTI, direktor direkcije za kadrovske in interne zadeve
Mr Bruno Buratti  (for the rapporteur)
Bruno BURATTI (za poročevalca)
Mr Bruno Buratti (for the rapporteur)
Bruno Buratti (za poročevalca)
Mr Bruno Clergeot (Gr.
G. Bruno CLERGEOT (I. SK.
Mr Bruno Coquet, President of the EU Employment Committee
Bruno COQUET, predsednik Evropskega odbora za zaposlovanje
Mr Bruno Coquet, President of the EU Employment Committee
Bruno COQUET, predsednik Evropskega odbora za zaposlovanje,
Mr Bruno Vever (for the rapporteur)
Bruno VEVER (za poročevalca)
Mr Bryan (IE-III)
John BRYAN (IE-III)
Mr Bryan Cassidy (UK-I)
Bryan CASSIDY (UK-I)
Mr Buelen (for Group II)
Werner BUELEN (za II. skupino)
Mr BUFFETAUT
BUFFETAUT
Mr Buffetaut (FR-I) (rule 62 - Butaud-Stubbs)
Stéphane BUFFETAUT (FR-I) (Emmanuelle BUTAUD-STUBBS, člen 62)
Mr Buffetaut (Rule 62 – Clergeot) (FR-I)
BUFFETAUT (CLERGEOT, člen 62) (FR-I)
Mr Buffetaut also noted the need to balance general political requirements with legitimate requests from the sections.
BUFFETAUT se je zavzel za ravnovesje med splošnimi političnimi zahtevami in legitimnimi zahtevami strokovnih skupin.
Mr Buffetaut also pointed out that many referrals were now sent directly by European Parliament committees, which testified to recognition of the EESC's expertise, and mentioned the problem of language use for category B+ opinions.
Buffetaut, ki je poudaril, da vse več zaprosil pošiljajo neposredno odbori Evropskega parlamenta, kar dokazuje priznanje strokovnosti EESO, in omenil jezikovno ureditev v primeru mnenj kategorije B+, g.
Mr Buffetaut commented on the perception of the EU as a big market of 500 million consumers, while it should also be seen as a pool of potential producers.
Stéphane Buffetaut je komentiral dejstvo, da EU velja za velik trg 500 milijonov potrošnikov, ki pa jih bilo treba upoštevati tudi kot bazo morebitnih proizvajalcev.
Mr Buffetaut considered that it was in the European Union's interest to live in harmony with Russia.
Stéphane BUFFETAUT je bil mnenja, da so dobri odnosi z Rusijo v interesu Evropske unije.
Mr Buffetaut doubted the effectiveness of any review of the treaties while wondering about the statutes and powers of the ECB.
BUFFETAUT je podvomil o učinkovitosti revizije pogodb in se vprašal o statusu in pooblastilih ECB.
Mr Buffetaut emphasised that migration was complex and multifaceted and that, as a result, we needed to speak in terms of different types of migration.
BUFFETAUT, ki je poudaril, da so migracije kompleksen in večplasten pojav, zato moramo govoriti o različnih oblikah migracij.
Mr Buffetaut hoped that there would be a good balance when it came to choosing speakers for this debate and Ms Attard asked for several clarifications on the discussion to be organised on the economic and social situation of women in the Euro-Mediterranean region.
Stéphane BUFFETAUT je menil, da bi moral biti izbor govornikov v tej razpravi čimbolj uravnotežen; Grace ATTARD je zaprosila za pojasnila o razpravi, ki naj bi jo organizirali o vprašanju gospodarskega in socialnega položaja žensk na evro-sredozemskem območju.
Mr Buffetaut presented the opinion.
BUFFETAUT, je predstavil mnenje.
Mr Buffetaut stressed that other sources of energy represent also serious risks (like coal mining and hydro energy), however RW have the most lasting effects for future generations.
BUFFETAUT je poudaril, da tudi drugi viri energije predstavljajo resna tveganja (kot premogovništvo in vodna energija), da pa imajo radioaktivni odpadki najbolj trajne učinke za prihodnje generacije.
Mr Buffetaut stressed the need for greater cooperation among Member States on EU energy policy.
BUFFETAUT je dejal, da je potrebno močnejše sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju energetske politike Unije, g.
Mr Buffetaut wondered about alternative solutions.
BUFFETAUT pa je vprašal o drugih možnih rešitvah.
Mr Buffetaut, the rapporteur, acknowledged that the Bureau held the ultimate power of decision on the matter, but explained that a compromise had been reached on the majority of amendments tabled.
BUFFETAUT, poročevalec za to mnenje, priznava pravico predsedstva, da odloča o tem vprašanju, vendar je pripomnil, da je treba v prihodnje večino predlaganih amandmajev sprejeti sporazumno.
Mr Bullock from the Commission stressed that:
Bullock iz Komisije je poudaril, da:
Mr Burada (RO-I)
Eugen Mircea BURADA (RO-I)
Mr Burada (RO-I) (Rule 62 Nagy)
Eugen MIRCEA BURADA (RO-I) (Tamas Nagy, člen 62)