natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
respond to navigational emergencies on inland waterways;
odzvati se na izredne dogodke pri plovbi po celinskih plovnih poteh;
Respond to requests for the deployment of outbreak assistance teams;
odzivati se na prošnje za pošiljanje ekip za pomoč ob izbruhu.
respond to the call of the European Council to increase the credit enhancement capacity of the EIF, in particular in favour of SMEs, and
odgovoriti na poziv Evropskega sveta, naj se poveča zmogljivost EIS za izboljšanje kreditne kvalitete, zlasti v korist MSP, in
Respond to the challenge of Demographic Ageing by stimulating investment in research, development and innovation in new ICT-based solutions for ageing well across Europe.
odziv na izziv staranja prebivalstva s spodbujanjem vlaganja v raziskave, razvoj in inovacije novih rešitev za prijetno staranje v Evropi, ki temeljijo na IKT.
respond to the challenges and opportunities that forest-based industries face  to stimulate growth.
zagotovi odziv na izzive in priložnosti, s katerimi se soočajo gospodarske panoge, da bi spodbudili rast;
Respond to the challenges to privacy and trust stemming from new converging services in the future ubiquitous information society;
reševanje problemov v zvezi z zasebnostjo in zaupanjem, ki nastajajo zaradi novih konvergentnih storitev v prihodnji vseprisotni informacijski družbi;
Respond to the evolving relationship with Russia by amending provisions on Russia’s eligibility for ENI funding to reflect the specific status of Russia as an EU neighbour and strategic partner.
Odziv na spremembe v odnosu z Rusijo, zaradi česar je treba spremeniti določbe o upravičenosti Rusije do sredstev evropskega sosedskega instrumenta, da bodo odražale poseben status Rusije kot sosede in strateške partnerice EU.
respond to user needs by compiling additional trade statistics using information available in customs declarations;
odzove na potrebe uporabnikov s pripravo dodatne trgovinske statistike, in sicer z uporabo informacij, ki so na voljo, v carinskih deklaracijah;
Respondents against developing European-wide quality standards argued that such standards are not necessary for the success of mediation, that national standards are too different, that the development of these standards should be left to Member States, or that self-regulation in each national market is sufficient.
Anketiranci, ki so bili proti razvoju evropskih standardov kakovosti, so trdili, da taki standardi niso potrebni za uspeh mediacije, da so nacionalni standardi preveč različni, da bi bilo treba razvoj teh standardov prepustiti državam članicam ali da zadostuje samoregulacija na vsakem nacionalnem trgu.
Respondents also generally called for more awareness raising actions, (exchange of best practices, expertise and experience).
Udeleženci posvetovanja so na splošno pozvali tudi k okrepitvi ukrepov za povečanje ozaveščenosti (izmenjava najboljših praks, strokovnega znanja in izkušenj).
Respondents also highlighted the risks for contributors in the crowd lending and crowd investing models (e.g. loss of invested capital, risk of fraud), as well as the need for transparency on platform charges, interest rates, and on the expected yields.
Udeleženci javnega posvetovanja so izpostavili tudi tveganja donatorjev pri modelih množičnega posojanja in množičnega vlaganja (npr. izguba vloženega kapitala, tveganje goljufije) ter potrebo po preglednosti stroškov platform, obrestnih mer in pričakovanih donosov.
Respondents also noted that EMIR appears to be more stringent with respect to NFCs than many similar regulatory regimes in third countries.
Sodelujoči so opozorili tudi, da se zdi uredba EMIR v zvezi z nefinančnimi nasprotnimi strankami strožja od številnih podobnih regulativnih ureditev v tretjih državah.
Respondents also questioned the compatibility of additional fees charged by some host Member States with Regulation (EU) 345/2013 and Regulation (EU) 346/2013.
Udeleženci so podvomili tudi o združljivosti dodatnih pristojbin, ki jih po Uredbi (EU) št. 345/2013 in Uredbi (EU) št. 346/2013 zaračunavajo nekatere države članice gostiteljice.
Respondents also questioned whether, as a result of the difficultly in submitting accurate data and matching, the data was as reliable and usable as it should be.
Zaradi težav pri predložitvi točnih podatkov in njihovem usklajevanju so sodelujoči izrazili pomisleke tudi o tem, da so podatki tako zanesljivi in uporabni, kot bi morali biti.
Respondents also underlined the importance of clear and long-term targets on making use of exiting targets and agreements.
Anketiranci so poudarili tudi pomen jasnih dolgoročnih ciljev za uporabo obstoječih ciljev in sporazumov.
Respondents also wanted a European Year to leave a long-term legacy, in part by generating long-lasting initiatives.
Sodelujoči so prav tako izrazili željo po dolgoročnem učinku evropskega leta, na primer z razvijanjem dolgoročnih pobud.
Respondents are invited to (1) identify what actions are necessary within their national contexts to ensure that schools deliver the quality of education needed in the 21st century; and (2) identify those aspects of school education on which cooperation at European Union level could help to support Member States in the modernisation of their systems9.
Udeležence vabimo, da (1) opredelijo ukrepe, ki so v njihovem nacionalnem okolju potrebni, da šole zagotovijo kakovost izobraževanja, ki je potrebna v 21. stoletju, in (2) opredelijo tiste vidike šolskega izobraževanja, pri katerih bi lahko Evropska unija države članice podprla pri posodabljanju njihovih sistemov9.
Respondents are invited to raise any other issues concerning agricultural product quality policy that have not been covered.
Vprašani so povabljeni, da postavijo kakršna koli vprašanja glede politike za kakovost kmetijskih proizvodov, ki niso bila obravnavana.
Respondents are most likely to say that the fire signs and equipment in their accommodation were unsafe (8%), followed by hygiene conditions (7%).
8 % anketirancev je navedlo, da so oznake požarnih poti in oprema v nastanitveni zmogljivosti nevarni, 7 % anketirancev pa je kot nevarne ocenilo higienske razmere.
Respondents are now invited to respond to some or all of the eight questions presented here by identifying (1) what actions they would favour within their national contexts to ensure that schools deliver the quality of education needed in the 21st century; and (2) to suggest how European cooperation37 could be effective in supporting Member States in the modernisation of their systems.
Udeležence posvetovanja vabimo, da odgovorijo na vsaj nekaj od osmih zastavljenih vprašanj in ob tem opredelijo, (1) kakšnim ukrepom bi bili naklonjeni v svojih nacionalnih okoljih za zagotovitev kakovosti šolskega izobraževanja, potrebnega v 21. stoletju, in (2) kako bi lahko evropsko sodelovanje 37 učinkovito podpiralo države članice pri posodabljanju njihovih sistemov.
Respondents are welcome to reply to part or all of the Green Paper.
Odgovarjate lahko na izbrana vprašanja ali na celotno zeleno knjigo.
Respondents argue that national technical rules still lead to substantial obstacles to the free movement of goods within the EU, and that this causes extra administrative controls and tests.
Vprašani namreč menijo, da nacionalni tehnični predpisi še naprej povzročajo visoke ovire za prost pretok blaga v EU in da to pomeni dodaten upravni nadzor in preskušanje.
Respondents broadly agree that a 6-month time-limit would be appropriate for the Commission to examine and come to a conclusion on an initiative.
Večina sodelujočih se je strinjala, da bi bil 6-mesečni rok ustrezno obdobje, v katerem bi Komisija pregledala pobudo in odločila o njej.
Respondents broadly support the idea of having a common set of procedural requirements for the collection and verification of statements of support so as to ensure a uniform process across the EU and to avoid organisers having to comply with different rules in each Member State.
Večina sodelujočih podpira idejo o enotnih procesnih zahtevah za zbiranje in preverjanje izjav o podpori, da se zagotovi enotni postopek po vsej EU in da organizatorjem ni treba upoštevati različnih pravil v vsaki državi članici.
Respondents call for future action to be guided by the ecosystem approach, the precautionary and polluters-pay principles and, in a broader sense, the cross-sectoral approach.
Vprašani zahtevajo, da prihodnje ukrepanje temelji na ekosistemskem pristopu, načelih previdnosti in kaznovanja onesnaževalcev ter – v širšem smislu – na medsektorskem pristopu.
Respondents commented that sustainability could be achieved through the use of project outputs; dissemination (e.g. public health reporting); continued collaboration and networking with partners and other organisations; training and additional funding.
Anketiranci so trdili, da se trajnost lahko doseže z uporabo rezultatov projekta; razširitvijo (npr. poročanjem o javnem zdravju); nadaljevanjem sodelovanja in vzpostavljanjem mrež s partnerji in drugimi organizacijami; usposabljanjem in dodatnim financiranjem.
Respondents concurred that there was a clear need for European level intervention in these areas, notwithstanding the primary responsibility of Member States.
Sodelujoči so se strinjali, da za ta področja obstaja velika potreba po posegih na evropski ravni, ne glede na prvenstveno odgovornost držav članic.
Respondents considered that common standards under the form of the "clarified ISAs" and ISQCs would contribute to harmonised and qualitative audits which in turn support the quality and credibility of the financial statements.
V prispevkih je bilo poudarjeno, da bi skupni standardi v obliki prečiščenih mednarodnih standardov revidiranja lahko pripomogli k usklajenosti in kakovosti revizij, ki bi podprle kakovost in verodostojnost računovodskih izkazov.
Respondents considered this was principally due to leverage ratio requirements anticipated by clearing members under the Capital Requirements Regulation11, which are perceived as having the potential to make client clearing services too costly for them to offer.
Sodelujoči so menili, da je to predvsem posledica zahtev glede količnika finančnega vzvoda, ki ga klirinški člani pričakujejo v skladu z uredbo o kapitalskih zahtevah11, saj bi zaradi teh zahtev izvajanje klirinških storitev za stranke lahko postalo predrago.
Respondents expressed a high level of satisfaction with most aspects of their 2013 holiday, in particular with the safety (95%) and the quality (95%) of their accommodation.
Anketiranci so izrazili visoko raven zadovoljstva z večino vidikov počitnic leta 2013, zlasti v zvezi z varnostjo (95 %) in kakovostjo (95 %) nastanitve.
Respondents expressed concerns that some measures would prevent banks from providing these essential clearing services to end users at a reasonable price.
Sodelujoče skrbi, da bodo nekateri ukrepi bankam preprečili zagotavljanje teh bistvenih klirinških storitev za končne uporabnike po primerni ceni.
Respondents found the proposed framework rather prescriptive.
Po mnenju vprašanih je predlagani okvir precej normativen.
Respondents from all Member States contributed to the consultation as well as respondents from some third countries.
Pri posvetovanju so sodelovali udeleženci iz vseh držav članic in tudi iz nekaterih tretjih držav.
Respondents from all Member States contributed to the consultation as well as respondents in some third countries.
Pri posvetovanju so sodelovali udeleženci iz vseh držav članic in tudi iz nekaterih tretjih držav.
Respondents from countries where interactive television is most advanced were in general satisfied that there was an adequate level of interoperability.
Udeleženci iz držav, kjer je interaktivna televizija najbolj razvita, so bili v glavnem zadovoljni s tem, da obstaja zadostna stopnja interoperabilnosti.
Respondents generally agreed that the much stronger performance of EU securitisations during the crisis compared to US ones needs to be recognised and that the current regulatory framework needs modification.
Anketiranci se strinjajo, da je treba opozoriti na to, da so bila listinjenja v EU med krizo veliko uspešnejša kot v ZDA ter da je treba spremeniti sedanji regulativni okvir.
Respondents generally confirmed that there was a need for taking action in the EU and that this should build on the existing mechanisms.
Sodelujoči so v splošnem potrdili potrebo po ukrepanju v EU in to, da bi moralo ukrepanje temeljiti na obstoječih mehanizmih.
Respondents have almost unanimously called citizens to be allowed to support initiatives online.
Sodelujoči so skoraj soglasno pozvali, naj se državljanom dovoli spletno izražanje podpore pobudam.
Respondents have also broadly agreed that strengthening and harmonising monitoring and enforcement of the sulphur standards is an important tool that would ensure delivery of the intended environmental improvements.
Vprašani so se na splošno tudi strinjali, da je krepitev in uskladitev spremljanja in izvrševanja standardov žvepla pomemben instrument, s katerim bo mogoče izboljšati okolje kot načrtovano.
Respondents highlighted the following measures in national law as particularly useful: requiring parties to state in their applications to courts whether mediation has been attempted which would not only remind judges examining court applications, but also lawyers who advise the parties of the possibility to use mediation, obligatory information sessions within the framework of a judicial procedure and an obligation of courts to consider mediation at every stage of judicial proceedings, in particular in family law matters.
Anketiranci so kot posebej koristne izpostavili naslednje ukrepe v nacionalni zakonodaji: zahtevo, da morajo stranke v vlogah, predloženih sodišču navesti, ali se je poskusila uporabiti mediacija, s čimer se na to možnost opozorijo tako sodniki, ki preučujejo vloge, kot tudi odvetniki, ki svetujejo strankam o možnosti uporabe mediacije; obvezna informativna srečanja v okviru sodnega postopka in obveznost sodišč, da preučijo možnost mediacije na vsaki stopnji sodnega postopka, zlasti v družinskopravnih zadevah.
Respondents highlighted the need for consistency and coherence in Community policies and the importance of a multi-sector approach.
Udeleženci so poudarili potrebo po doslednosti in skladnosti politik Skupnosti in pomembnost večsektorskega pristopa.
Respondents identified safety and privacy as the most important concerns which could be managed with an appropriate regulatory framework that keeps rules proportionate to risk and with a strong role for national authorities.
Sodelujoči so varnost in zasebnost opredelili kot najpomembnejši vprašanji, ki bi se ju lahko upravljalo z ustreznim regulativnim okvirom, ki pravila ohranja sorazmerna s tveganjem in v katerem imajo močno vlogo nacionalni organi.
Respondents in Austria reported tailor-made specifications for particular companies in 66% of cases, which is above the EU average.
66 % anketirancev v Avstriji, kar je nad povprečjem EU, je navedlo, da se specifikacije prilagajajo določenim družbam.
Respondents in favour of developing European-wide quality standards were divided between those in favour of EU-wide uniform standards which they consider necessary in order to further promote the take-up of mediation and those in favour of minimum standards which would ensure consistency, but which would also make it possible to take into account local differences in mediation cultures.
Anketiranci, ki so podprli razvoj evropskih standardov kakovosti, so bili razdeljeni med zagovornike evropskih enotnih standardov, ker naj bi bili ti po njihovem mnenju potrebni za nadaljnje spodbujanje uporabe mediacije, in zagovornike minimalnih standardov, s katerimi bi se zagotovila doslednost, hkrati pa omogočilo tudi upoštevanje lokalnih razlik v mediacijskih kulturah.
Respondents in Slovakia reported tailor-made specifications for particular companies in 84 % of cases and 77 % reported collusive bidding as being a widespread practice.43 Moreover, 63 % of respondents noted conflicts of interest in the evaluation of bids and 62 % pointed to unclear selection or evaluation criteria.44 Given the perception of business representatives that these practices are widespread, monitoring them by introducing ex-ante checks would improve the situation.
84 % vprašanih na Slovaškem je poročalo o razpisnih pogojih, prilagojenih določenim podjetjem, 77 % pa o skrivnem dogovarjanju pri oddaji ponudb, ki naj bi bilo zelo razširjena praksa.43 Poleg tega je 63 % anketiranih opazilo navzkrižja interesov pri oceni ponudb, 62 % pa jih je opozorilo na nejasna merila za izbor ali oceno.44 Glede na to, da predstavniki podjetij te prakse zaznavajo kot zelo razširjene, bi stanje lahko izboljšala uvedba predhodnih pregledov, s katerimi bi se te prakse spremljale.
Respondents in the public consultation recognised the important role of mediation in particular in family law matters (especially in proceedings concerning the custody over children, access rights and child abduction cases), besides the commercial disputes.
Anketiranci v javnem posvetovanju so priznali, da ima mediacija poleg gospodarskih sporov pomembno vlogo zlasti v družinskopravnih zadevah (zlasti v postopkih v zvezi s pravico do varstva in vzgoje otrok, pravico do stika z otrokom in primeri ugrabitve otrok).
Respondents included governments, public bodies, business representatives, associations, NGOs, academics and citizens.
Med drugim so se odzvali vlade, javni organi, predstavniki podjetij, združenja, nevladne organizacije, akademiki in državljani.
Respondents included media organisations and industry, formal and non-formal education institutions, content providers and producers, research and cultural institutions, regulators and citizens' and consumers' associations.
Udeleženci so bili medijske organizacije in industrija, institucije formalnega in neformalnega izobraževanja, ponudniki in proizvajalci vsebin, raziskovalne in kulturne institucije, regulativni organi in združenja državljanov in potrošnikov.
Respondents included Member States, regional and local authorities, social partners, European interest organisations, non-governmental organisations, citizens and other stakeholders.
Med drugim so se odzvali države članice, regionalni in lokalni organi, socialni partnerji, evropske interesne organizacije, nevladne organizacije, državljani in druge zainteresirane strani.
Respondents indicated a clear need for better public information, a greater desire for protection from air pollution and a willingness to pay for reduced risks on a par with those for drinking water.
Vprašani so navedli jasno potrebo po boljšem javnem informiranju, močno željo po varstvu pred onesnaženjem zraka in pripravljenost plačati ceno za zmanjšana tveganja, enako kakor se to dogaja s pitno vodo.
Respondents mention the memoranda of understanding between OSPAR and NEAFC, and between UNEP/MAP/Barcelona Convention and the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) as good models for this.
Vprašani kot dober zgled za to omenjajo memorandume o soglasju med OSPAR in NEAFC ter med UNEP/MAP/Barcelonsko konvencijo in Generalno komisijo za ribištvo v Sredozemlju (GFCM).
Respondents point to the EU’s EMODnet as a good example and support the creation of a global EMODnet, with common standards and contributions from all data providers, including the private sector.
Vprašani izpostavljajo mrežo EU EMODnet kot dober primer ter podpirajo vzpostavitev globalne mreže EMODnet s skupnimi standardi in prispevki vseh ponudnikov podatkov, vključno z zasebnim sektorjem.
Respondents pointed out challenges in applying these requirements in particular as they might be difficult to implement in certain Member States' due to domestic insolvency laws.
Sodelujoči so opozorili na izzive pri uporabi teh zahtev, zlasti ker domače insolvenčno pravo v nekaterih državah članicah otežuje njihovo izvajanje.
Respondents represent a cross-section of industries both directly and indirectly concerned by transport security.
Sodelujoči predstavljajo gospodarske panoge, ki jih varnost prometa neposredno ali posredno zadeva.
Respondents said that BEREC needed to be more proactive on key topics.
Udeleženci so navedli, da bi pri glavnih temah BEREC moral biti proaktivnejši.
Respondents should state whether they object to their replies and observations being placed on the Commission's website.
Osebe, ki bodo sodelovale pri tem posvetovanju, morajo navesti, če nasprotujejo objavi svojih odgovorov in pripomb na spletni strani Komisije.
Respondents should state whether they object to their responses and observations being put out on the Commission’s website.
Osebe, ki bodo poslale odgovore na to razpravo, morajo navesti, če nasprotujejo objavi svojih odgovorov in pripomb na spletni strani Komisije.
Respondents stated that the EU should make good use of its comparative advantage linked to its global field presence, its wide-ranging expertise, its supranational nature and its role as a facilitator of coordination.
Vprašani so navedli, da bi morala EU izkoristiti svojo primerjalno prednost, ki je povezana z njeno prisotnostjo na terenu po vsem svetu, njenim obširnim strokovnim znanjem, nadnacionalno naravo in njeno vlogo posrednika pri koordinaciji;
Respondents stressed that competent authorities vary in their interpretation of "sufficient own funds", with some competent authorities applying the full requirements for authorised managers under AIFMD.
Udeleženci so poudarili, da pristojni organi različno pojmujejo „zadostna lastna sredstva“, pri čemer nekateri pristojni organi uporabljajo polne zahteve za upravitelje z dovoljenjem v skladu z direktivo AIFMD.
Respondents support an enhanced enforcement framework to ensure that the strategy delivers results, through the right level of ambition and enforcement tools.
Anketiranci podpirajo okrepljeni okvir izvrševanja za zagotovitev uspešnosti strategije, in sicer prek ustrezne ravni ambicioznosti in načinov izvrševanja.
Respondents to surveys in the US expressed confidence in their understanding of financial issues but, when tested, demonstrated only a limited understanding8.
Anketiranci v ZDA so menili, da razumejo finančne zadeve, vendar pa so, ko so jih testirali, pokazali samo omejeno razumevanje8.
Respondents to the Commission’s review process have requested a number of clarifications to the existing rules.
Sodelujoči v postopku pregleda, ki ga je izvedla Komisija, so zahtevali številne pojasnitve obstoječih pravil.
Respondents to the consultation noted out that several Member States have not taken into account the size of the EuVECA and EuSEF managers when interpreting and applying the EuVECA and EuSEF Regulations, in particular as they charge fees, impose additional requirements or impose the same level of requirements as foreseen for large managers authorised under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive 2011/61/EU.
Vprašani so pri posvetovanju poudarili, da več držav članic pri razlagi in uporabi uredb o EuVECA in EuSEF ni upoštevalo velikosti upraviteljev EuVECA in EuSEF, predvsem ker zaračunavajo pristojbine in nalagajo dodatne zahteve ali enako raven zahtev, kot je predvidena za večje upravitelje, ki imajo dovoljenje v skladu z Direktivo 2011/61/EU o upraviteljih alternativnih investicijskih skladov.
Respondents to the online consultation expect these safeguards to emerge from privacy enhancing technologies (70%) and awareness raising (67%); specific legislation on RFID was seen as the best solution by 55%.
Vprašani pri javnem posvetovanju pričakujejo, da bodo ti zaščitni ukrepi temeljili na tehnologijah za boljše varovanje zasebnosti (70 %) in ozaveščanju (67 %); 55 % vprašanih pa meni, da je najboljša rešitev posebna zakonodaja o RFID.
Respondents to the Parliament’s post-election survey said that the main reason they voted was that they always vote (41 %), their ‘duty as a citizen’ (41 %) or ‘to support a political party to which I feel close’ (22 %).
Anketiranci so v povolilni študiji Evropskega parlamenta kot glavni razlog za svojo udeležbo na volitvah navedli, da vedno volijo (41 %), da je to njihova „državljanska dolžnost“ (41 %) ali da volijo za „podporo politični stranki, ki sem ji blizu“ (22 %).