natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the collapse in demand at that time was still regarded as a purely cyclical phenomenon, capacity was maintained despite crisis measures.
Since the collapse in demand at that time was still regarded as a purely cyclical phenomenon, capacity was maintained despite crisis measures.<}0{>Ker se je na tedanji nenadni upad povpraševanja še vedno gledalo zgolj kot na cikličen pojav, so se kljub kriznim ukrepom zmogljivosti ohranjale.
Since the collapse in demand from these countries, the European industry has experienced a steady increase in its exports to emerging Asian (mainly China) and Latin American (mainly Brazil) markets, where demand is strong but the local authorities are interested in safeguarding and developing their own national industries.
Zaradi občutnega upada povpraševanja v teh državah se vse bolj povečuje izvoz na hitro razvijajoče se trge v Aziji (predvsem na Kitajsko) in Latinski Ameriki (predvsem v Brazilijo), kjer je povpraševanje sicer močno, vendar želijo tamkajšnje oblasti zaščititi in razvijati nacionalno industrijo.
Since the collapse of communism a particularly important role has been played by the re-established Autocephalous Orthodox Church of Albania, which does an enormous amount of humanitarian and charitable work that is already recognised.
Po propadu komunizma je igrala predvsem pomembno novoustanovljena neodvisna pravoslavna cerkev v Albaniji, ki izvaja številna človekoljubna in dobrodelna dela, ki so že priznana.
Since the combination of these measures will overshoot the margin under Heading 4 (up to – EUR 162.2 million, if the maximum amount of EUR 40 million for the sugar reform is taken into account), recourse will have to be made to the flexibility instrument for part of the amount.
Ker bo kombinacija teh ukrepov presegla rezervo iz rubrike 4 (za do 162,2 milijona EUR, če se upošteva najvišji znesek za sladkorno reformo 40 milijonov EUR), se bo treba pri delu tega zneska zateči k instrumentu prilagodljivosti.
Since the Commission appears to have already decided which option it intends to adopt next October, as announced, it seems fairly pointless to present an impact assessment featuring five options, when the choice was a foregone conclusion from the start.
Ker se zdi, da se je Komisija že odločila, katero možnost namerava sprejeti oktobra, kot je bilo napovedano, se zdi precej nesmiselno, da se predloži ocena učinka, ki obravnava pet možnosti, če pa je bila izbira opravljena že v začetku.
Since the Commission appreciates the work of non-governmental organisations in development cooperation, the EESC therefore suggests that EU support for these mostly volunteer initiatives be further strengthened in order to improve their impact.
Komisija ceni delo nevladnih organizacij na področju razvojnega sodelovanja, zato EESO predlaga, da se podpora EU tem večinoma prostovoljnim dejavnostim nadalje krepi in s tem poveča njihov učinek.
Since the Commission assumes that advanced fuels will be needed to meet the 10% goal, it resorts to a gimmick when calculating how this objective can be met.
Ker Komisija predpostavlja, da bodo za doseganje 10-odstotnega cilja potrebna takšna "napredna" goriva, pri ugotavljanju, kako ga izpolniti, uporablja računski trik.
Since the Commission communication, "the increasing diversity of agriculture and rural areas following successive enlargements" has been recognised, as has the fact that: "policies set at European level are therefore needed in order to ensure fair conditions with a common set of objectives, principles and rules."
V sporočilu je Komisija priznala "vse večjo diverzifikacijo kmetijstva in podeželskih območij po zaporednih širitvah", vendar pa je tudi poudarila, da so "potrebne politike na evropski ravni, da se zagotovijo pravične razmere ter določijo skupni cilji, načela in pravila".
Since the Commission first launched the idea in 2005, a wide consultation process and an extensive impact assessment work have taken place.
Odkar je Komisija leta 2005 prvič predstavila to idejo, sta bila izvedena obsežen postopek posvetovanja in obširna ocena učinka.
Since the Commission had doubts regarding the guarantees aimed at ensuring that only victims of the disasters would be compensated and that the amount of aid would not exceed the damage, it launched a formal investigation procedure on 17 September 2003.
Ker je Komisija dvomila o jamstvih za zagotovitev, da bodo nadomestilo prejele samo žrtve naravnih nesreč in da znesek pomoči ne bo višji od škode, je 17. septembra 2003 uvedla formalni preiskovalni postopek.
Since the Commission is engaged to align the sectorial legislation to the NLF, the impact assessment concentrated in analysing the impacts of the alignment only.
Ker mora Komisija uskladiti sektorsko zakonodajo z novim zakonodajnim okvirom, je ocena učinka osredotočena samo na preučitev učinkov te uskladitve.
Since the Commission is not the only institution which is entitled to impose fines or other penalties, it is necessary to set provisions concerning such fines or other penalties imposed by other institutions and to set rules for their recovery which should be equivalent to those for the fines or penalties imposed by the Commission.
Ker Komisija ni edina institucija, ki ima pravico izreči globe ali druge kazni, bi bilo treba določiti določbe v zvezi s takšnimi globami ali drugimi kaznimi, ki jih izrečejo druge institucije, ter določiti pravila za njihovo izterjavo, ki bi morala biti enakovredna pravilom glede glob ali kazni, ki jih izreče Komisija.
Since the Commission is simultaneously proposing a recast of the Visa Code16, this proposal will refer to the provisions of the proposed recast regulation rather than the existing regulation17.
Glede na to, da Komisija hkrati predlaga prenovitev Vizumskega zakonika16, se ta predlog sklicuje na določbe predlagane prenovljene uredbe in ne na uredbo, ki je trenutno v veljavi17.
Since the Commission launched the internal market initiative in 1985, the single market has come a long way in turning the four freedoms enshrined in the Treaty - the free movement of people, goods, services and capital - into reality.
Odkar je Komisija leta 1985 sprožila pobudo o vzpostavitvi notranjega trga, je enotni trg dosegel znatni napredek pri dejanskem uresničevanju štirih svoboščin, zapisanih v Pogodbo – prosti pretok oseb, blaga, storitev in kapitala.
Since the Commission notes that Council and Parliament agree to keep ENISA separate from this new body, the deletion of the reference to the Chief Network Security Officer and its replacement by a reference to the Managing Director is accepted.
Ker Komisija ugotavlja, da se Svet in Parlament strinjata, da agencija ENISA ostane ločena od novega organa, sprejema črtanje glavnega uradnika za varnost omrežij in njegovo nadomestitev z generalnim(‑o) direktorjem(‑ico).
Since the Commission proposes that the Fund focuses mainly on third country nationals having recently arrived and been admitted by a Member State to reside in its territory (‘newcomers’), the second component would be the most important one and would therefore be weighed more than the first (60%).
Ker Komisija predlaga, da se Sklad v glavnem osredotoča na državljane tretjih držav, ki so nedavno prispeli in jih je država članica sprejela, da lahko prebivajo na njenem ozemlju („novo prispeli priseljenci“), bi bil drugi element najpomembnejši in bi se ponderiral bolj kot prvi (60 %).
Since the Commission will pay only having received the outputs (national translations of international agreements), the quality of which can be verified, there is no risk of fraud.
Ker bo Komisija izvedla plačila samo na podlagi prejetih realizacij (nacionalni prevodi mednarodnih sporazumov), katerih kakovost je mogoče preveriti, ni nevarnosti goljufij.
Since the Commission's adoption in 2007 of the draft Council Framework Council Decision on the use of PNR data, a predecessor of the proposed directive, comments have been made by the European Data Protection Supervisor3, which in March of this year issued a further opinion on the new text, the Article 29 Working Party on Data Protection which also published an opinion in April of this year4, the Fundamental Rights Agency and the European Parliament, which adopted a resolution on the 2007 proposal5, and is involved in the legislative procedure regarding the present proposal under the terms of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Od leta 2007, ko je Komisija sprejela okvirni sklep Sveta o uporabi podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih, ki je bil predhodnik tega predloga direktive, so večkrat zavzeli stališče Evropski nadzornik varstva podatkov3, ki se je med drugim o novem predlogu izrekel tudi marca letos, delovna skupina za varstvo podatkov iz člena 29, ki je svoje stališče podala aprila letos4, Agencija za temeljne pravice Evropske unije in Evropski parlament5, ki je v zvezi s predlogom iz leta 2007 sprejel resolucijo in ki v skladu z določili Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sodeluje pri zakonodajni pripravi sedaj predlaganega besedila.
Since the Committee already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CES 1031/2013 – 2012/0364 (COD), adopted on 20 March 2013, it has decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it took in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES 1031/2013 – 2012/0364 (COD), sprejetem 20. marca 2013, zato je sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee considers differences in national lists to be contrary to the spirit of equity and that this situation is bound to come into conflict with the objective of reducing asylum shopping, it recommends that the reference to countries considered as "safe" should not be maintained until all Member States have decided on a common list of countries considered as such.
Ker Odbor meni, da so razlike med nacionalnimi seznami v nasprotju z duhom pravičnosti in da je ta položaj lahko v nasprotju s ciljem glede omejevanja prakse izbiranja države azila, predlaga, da se sklicevanje na državo, ki se obravnava kot varna, ne ohrani, dokler seznam držav, ki se obravnavajo kot varne, ni skupen v vseh državah članicah.
Since the Committee endorsed the content of the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Ker je Odbor soglašal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorsed the content of the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Ker se je Odbor strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorsed the contents of the proposal and had already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1209/20091, adopted on 16 July 2009, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor je že odobril vsebino predloga in to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1209/20091, sprejetem 16. julija 2009, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorsed the contents of the proposal and had already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 643/20101, adopted on 28 April 2010, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 643/20101, sprejetem 28. aprila 2010, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorsed the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 465th plenary session of 15 and 16 September 2010 (meeting of 15 September 2010), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 465. plenarnem zasedanju 15. in 16. septembra 2010 (seja z dne 15. septembra) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 465th plenary session of 15 and 16 September 2010 (meeting of 15 September), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 465. plenarnem zasedanju 15. in 16. septembra 2010 (seja z dne 15. septembra) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 465th plenary session of 15 and 16 September 2010 (meeting of 15 September), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 465. plenarnem zasedanju 15. in 16. septembra 2010 (seja z dne 15. septembra) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 464th plenary session of 14 and 15 July 2010 (meeting of 14 July 2010), by 163 votes to 1 with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 464. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. julija 2010 (seja z dne 14. julija) s 163 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 476th plenary session of 7 and 8 December 2011 (meeting of 7 December), by 177 votes with 11 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 476. plenarnem zasedanju 7. in 8. decembra 2011 (seja z dne 7. decembra) s 177 glasovi za in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 478th plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2012 (meeting of 22 February), by 138 votes to 4 with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 478. plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. februarja 2012 (seja z dne 22. februarja) s 138 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 493rd plenary session, held on 16 and 17 October 2013 (meeting of 16 October 2013), by 149 votes to 3 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 493. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. oktobra 2013 (seja z dne 16. oktobra) s 149 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comments on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je sklenil, da o tem predlogu sprejme pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in an earlier opinion4, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, o katerem je v preteklosti že pripravil mnenje4, zato je sklenil o predlaganem besedilu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1022/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1022/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1025/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1025/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1294/2012, adopted on 23 May 2012*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 1294/2012, sprejetem 23. maja 2012*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 582/2003, adopted on 14 May 2003*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 582/2003, sprejetem 14. maja 2003*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 794/2011 – 2010/0373 (COD), adopted on 5 May 2011*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 794/2011 – 2010/0373 (COD), sprejetem 5. maja 2011*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 794/2011 – 2010/0373 (COD), adopted on 5 May 2011, it has decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 794/2011 – 2010/0373 (COD), sprejetem 5. maja 2011, zato je sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje in zavzeti enako stališče kot v zgoraj navedenem dokumentu.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 966/2010, adopted on 14 July 2010*, it decided, at its 496th plenary session (meeting of 26 February 2014), by 224 votes to 4 with 13 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 966/2010, sprejetem 14. julija 2010*, zato je na 496. plenarnem zasedanju 26. in 27. februarja 2014 (seja z dne 26. februarja) z 224 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 966/2010, adopted on 14 July 2010*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 966/2010, sprejetem 14. julija 2010*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 469th plenary session of 16 and 17 February 2011 (meeting of 16 February 2011), by 128 votes and one abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 469. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. februarja 2011 (seja z dne 16. februarja) s 128 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 477th plenary session of 18 and 19 January 2012 (meeting of 18 January 2012), by 171 votes with 14 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 477. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. januarja 2012 (seja z dne 18. januarja) s 171 glasovi za in 14 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 477th plenary session of 18 and 19 January 2012 (meeting of 18 January 2012), by 171 votes  with 14 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 477. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. januarja 2012 (seja z dne 18. januarja) s 171 glasovi za in 14 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 478th plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2012 (meeting of 22 February 2012), by 130 votes with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Ker se je Odbor strinjal z vsebino predloga, je na 478. plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. februarja 2012 (seja z dne 22. februarja) s 130 glasovi za in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.