natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mr Nilsson informed the Assembly of the various activities in which he had recently participated.
Predsednik NILSSON je skupščino obvestil o dogodkih, ki se jih je v zadnjem času udeležil.
Mr Nilsson informed the assembly of the various stages of the plenary session before awarding the 2011 EESC civil society prize.
NILSSON, je pred podelitvijo nagrade EESO za civilno družbo skupščino seznanil s potekom različnih točk plenarnega zasedanja.
Mr Nilsson judged that this work programme established a clear framework for the activities of the observatory but felt that linking this programme to the document which had served as the basis for the decision to establish the SDO would have been useful.
NILSSON je menil, da ta program dela ponuja jasno začrtan delovni okvir, da pa bi si kljub temu želel, da bi ga povezali z dokumentom, ki je bil podlaga za odločitev za ustanovitev opazovalne skupine za trajnostni razvoj.
Mr Nilsson noted that the names of the participants had only been decided the day before by the groups, which had been acting independently.
Predsednik Nilsson je dejal, da so skupine imena članov sporočile dan pred zasedanjem in da so se odločale vsaka zase.
Mr Nilsson pointed out that, often, different revised versions of the legislative programme in different language versions, where the purpose of the amendments was not immediately obvious, were submitted to Bureau members before the meeting.
NILSSON je povedal, da se članom predsedstva pred sejo pogosto predložijo revidirane različice zakonodajnega programa v posameznih jezikovnih različicah, pri tem pa ni možno takoj ugotoviti, na kaj se spremembe nanašajo.
Mr Nilsson proposed that the group presidents meet after all the amendments had been tabled so that a compromise agreement could be reached, enabling the revised Rules of Procedure to be adopted with the required majority.
NILSSON je predlagal, da se predsedniki skupin sestanejo, ko bodo prispeli vsi amandmaji, da bi dosegli kompromise, ki so potrebni, da bi večina sprejela revidirani poslovnik.
Mr Nilsson referred more explicitly to the situation in Libya, which he described as a civil war against a dictator in the strict sense of the word, and raised questions about the slowness of the response from international and European institutions.
Izpostavil je zlasti razmere v Libiji, ki jih je označil za državljansko vojno proti diktatorju v strogem pomenu besede, in pograjal pozen odziv mednarodnih in evropskih institucij.
Mr Nilsson reminded those present that it was the EESC that had proposed the European Year of Volunteering, and hoped that the EESC would be engaged in the activities during the 2011 "Year".
NILSSON je spomnil na to, da je bil EESO tisti, ki je predlagal evropsko leto prostovoljstva, ter izrazil upanje, da se bo EESO vključeval v dejavnosti v evropskem letu 2011.
Mr Nilsson requested that rapporteurs' speaking time be limited to 5 minutes when the Assembly examined the opinions.
NILSSON je predlagal, da se pri obravnavi mnenj v skupščini poročevalcem čas za razpravo omeji na 5 minut.
Mr Nilsson said it was a pity that the Budget Group had not taken a clear stand on the qaestors' draft and confirmed that the groups should examine the matter in July.
NILSSON je obžaloval, da skupina za proračun ni zavzela jasnega stališča glede projekta, ki so ga pripravili kvestorji, in poudaril, da morajo skupine to vprašanje preučiti julija.
Mr Nilsson said that he was willing to brief members on these visits.
Predsednik je izrazil tudi pripravljenost, da člane seznani s podrobnostmi teh srečanj.
Mr Nilsson said that the Committee's recent discussions with the Council of Europe on fundamental rights, food security and development had been encouraging.
Predsednik Staffan NILSSON je nedavne izmenjave Odbora s Svetom Evrope na področju temeljnih pravic, prehranske varnosti in razvoja označil kot spodbudne.
Mr Nilsson stressed that during the preparatory phase wide-ranging agreement had been reached concerning the text.
Poudaril je, da je bil med pripravo dosežen širok sporazum glede besedila.
Mr Nilsson stressed that the three groups were responsible for ensuring that proposals put to the vote during the plenary session could obtain the majority needed to revise the Rules of Procedure; he expressed doubts regarding the proposals previously put forward by Group I on the revision of Rules 10 and 72 and called on them to reconsider these proposals.
NILSSON je poudaril, da so vse tri skupine odgovorne za zagotovitev, da vsi predloženi predlogi na plenarnem zasedanju prejmejo potrebno večino za potrditev revizije poslovnika; navedel pa je tudi nekaj dvomov glede predlogov, ki jih je glede revizije členov 10 in 72 poslovnika predhodno predložila I. skupina, in vse tri skupine pozval k njihovi ponovni preučitvi.
Mr Nilsson then briefed those present on the recent events in which he had participated, including Consumer Day in Copenhagen on 15 March, the Summit of Cities and Regions organised by the CoR in Copenhagen on 22 March, and a conference on the budget which had been attended by representations of national parliamentary assemblies and the EP.
Predsednik je omenil tudi zadnje dogodke, ki se jih je udeležil, zlasti dan potrošnikov 15. marca v Københavnu, vrh mest in regij, ki ga je 22. marca v Københavnu organiziral Odbor regij (OR), ter konferenco o proračunu, ki so se je udeležili predstavniki nacionalnih parlamentarnih skupščin in Evropskega parlamenta.
Mr Nilsson then expressed his concern regarding the situation in Tunisia, following the fall of the regime.
NILSSON je nato izrazil zaskrbljenost nad razmerami v Tuniziji po padcu režima.
Mr Nilsson then turned to the conference on the Europe 2020 strategy and the twentieth anniversary celebrations of the internal market both of which were interesting events which the EESC would be involved in.
NILSSON je zatem omenil konferenco o strategiji Evropa 2020 in počastitev 20. obletnice notranjega trga, dva zanimiva dogodka, pri katerih bo sodeloval Odbor.
Mr Nilsson welcomed Mr Jens Nymand Christensen, director responsible for Parliamentary and Interinstitutional Issues at the European Commission's secretariat-general.
Predsednik NILSSON je pozdravil prisotnost Jensa NYMANDA CHRISTENSENA, direktorja za parlamentarne in medinstitucionalne zadeve v generalnem sekretariatu Evropske komisije.
Mr Nilsson welcomed the initiative to make Bureau meetings more political.
NILSSON je pozdravil pobudo, da postanejo seje predsedstva bolj politično naravnane.
Mr Nilsson's welcome address and introductory speech, the awarding of the prize at the rostrum and the speeches of the prize winners are to be found in Appendix 1 to these minutes.
Uvodni govor in pozdrav Staffana NILSSONA, predsednika EESO, ter podelitev nagrad na tribuni in govori nagrajencev so povzeti v prilogi tega zapisnika (Priloga I).
Mr Nilsson, Mr Dassis and Mr Joost took part in the discussion, Mr Dassis pointing out that Mr Malosse's concerns were not shared by all Group I members.
DASSIS je poudaril, da se vsi člani I. skupine ne strinjajo z zaskrbljenostjo g. MALOSSA.
Mr Nose (SL-III)
Mr Nose (SL – III)
Mr Novotný (CZ-I)
Vladimir NOVOTNÝ (CZ-I)
Mr Novotný (CZ-I)
Vladimír NOVOTNÝ (CZ-I)
Mr Novotný (CZ-I) (Rule 62(3) – Vadász)
Vladimir NOVOTNÝ (CZ-I) (Borbála VADÁSZ, člen 62 (3))
Mr Nuno Conde (for Group III)
Nuno CONDE (za III. skupino)
Mr Nurm (EE-III)
Kaul NURM(EE-III)
Mr Nurm considered the opinion to be well-balanced as it asks the Commission to reconsider the issue whilst taking into account the interests of both consumers and producers.
Nurm je menil, da je mnenje dobro uravnoteženo, saj v njem Odbor prosi Komisijo, da še enkrat preuči vprašanje ob upoštevanju tako interesov potrošnikov kot interesov proizvajalcev.
Mr Nurm explained the justification of regulating the market by the fact that milk production is a long-term process, in which the results of a decision are only seen two or three years later.
Nurm je pojasnil, da je urejanja trga utemeljeno z dejstvom, da je proizvodnja mleka dolgoročen proces, v katerem se rezultati neke odločitve vidijo šele po dveh ali treh letih.
Mr Nurm underlined the need for a common/joint strategy, as well as appropriate funding.
Nurm je poudaril potrebo po skupni strategiji in ustreznem financiranju.
Mr Nyberg (SE-II) (Rule 62-Jansson)
NYBERG (SE-II) (Jansson, člen 62)
Mr Nyberg (SE-II) (Rule 62-Jansson)
NYBERG (SE-II) (JANSSONOVO, člen 62)
Mr Nyberg commented that some EESC opinions had greater weight than others and, in the context of the reorganisation of the work of the EESC, he called for the decision-making process to be made less onerous, e.g. for opinions on straightforward proposals for codification.
NYBERG je ugotavljal, da imajo nekatera mnenja EESO večjo težo kot druga, in v zvezi z reorganizacijo dela EESO pozval, da bi bilo treba proces odločanja olajšati za mnenja o predlogih za, na primer, kodifikacijo.
Mr Nyberg gave a brief overview of various approaches to wages and demand in different Member States, also in view of the IMF recommendations.
Nyberg je na kratko predstavil različne pristope k plačam in povpraševanju v različnih državah članicah, tudi upoštevajoč priporočila MDS.
Mr Nyberg observed that no single social model existed in Africa.
Nyberga, in pri tem poudarili, da v Afriki ne obstaja samo en družbeni model.
Mr Nyberg pointed out that the Committee opinion which was referred in point 1.20 on "Financial transaction tax"1 was already adopted and suggested to change this point accordingly.
NYBERG je poudaril, da je bilo mnenje Odbora, navedeno v točki 1.20 o davku na finančne transakcije1 že sprejeto, in zato predlagal, da se ta točka ustrezno spremeni.
Mr O'Connor (IE-II)
O'CONNOR (IE-II)
Mr O'Riordan (IE-II)
Manus O'RIORDAN (IE-II)
Mr O'Riordan was opposed to the compromise.
O'Riordan pa je kompromisu nasprotoval.
Mr O'Sullivan began by saying that the EU was still interested in maintaining the multilateral system because multilateralism promoted free trade.
O'SULLIVAN je svoj govor začel z opozorilom, da je EU zainteresirana za ohranitev večstranskega sistema, saj večstranskost spodbuja liberalizacijo trgovine.
Mr O'Sullivan, Director General, DG TRADE
O'SULLIVAN, generalni direktor GD za trgovino
Mr Ohlström (for the rapporteur)
Mikael OHLSTRÖM (za poročevalko)
Mr Ojeda (for the rapporteur)
Javier OJEDA (za poročevalca)
Mr Ola Alterå, State-Secretary to the Swedish Minister for Enterprise and Industry, on behalf of the presidency-in-office of the Council (to be confirmed),
Ola ALTERÅ, državni sekretar s švedsega ministrstva za podjetništvo in energijo, v imenu predsedstva Sveta (še ni potrjeno),
Mr Ole Just (for Group III)
Ole Just (za III. skupino)
Mr Oliver Henman
Oliver HENMAN
Mr Oliver Röpke
Barbara SCHENMACH
Mr Oliver Röpke (AT-II)
Oliver RÖPKE (AT-II)
Mr Olivier Bopp (for the rapporteur)
Olivier BOPP (za poročevalko)
Mr Olivier Chastel, Belgian State Secretary for European Affairs
Olivier CHASTEL, državni sekretar za evropske zadeve v belgijski vladi,
Mr Olivier Chastel, Belgium's Secretary of State for European Affairs, representing the Belgian presidency of the EU Council, on 15 July at 10 a.m.
Olivier CHASTEL, belgijski državni sekretar za evropske zadeve v imenu belgijskega predsedstva Sveta EU, 15. julij ob 10.00
Mr Olivier Consolo (CONCORD), rapporteur for the Liaison Group: proposals for follow-up to Rio by European civil society
Olivier CONSOLO, direktor konfederacije CONCORD, poročevalec skupine za stike s civilno družbo
Mr Olivier Consolo (CONCORD), rapporteur for the Liaison Group: proposals for follow-up to Rio by European civil society, and
Olivier CONSOLO (CONCORD), poročevalec skupine za stike s civilno družbo: predlogi nadaljnjih ukrepov po konferenci v Riu na ravni evropske civilne družbe, ter
Mr Olivier Consolo – CONCORD (rapporteur's expert)
Olivier CONSOLO, CONCORD
Mr Olivier De Schutter, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to food
Olivier DE SCHUTTER, posebni poročevalec OZN za pravico do hrane, in
Mr Olivier De Schutter, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to food
Oliviera DE SCHUTTERJA, posebnega poročevalca OZN za pravico do hrane, in
Mr Olivier Deleuze, Director of the Liaison Office with the European Union, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), on 5 November at 10 a.m.
M. Olivier DELEUZE, direktor Urada za zveze pri Evropski uniji, Program Združenih narodov za okolje, 5. novembra 2009 ob 10.00
Mr Olivier Deleuze, Director of the Liaison Office with the European Union, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), on 5 November at 10 a.m.
Olivier DELEUZE, direktor Urada za zveze pri Evropski uniji, Program Združenih narodov za okolje, 5. novembra 2009 ob 10.00
Mr Olivier Deleuze, Director, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Olivier DELEUZE, direktor Urada za zveze pri Evropski uniji, Program Združenih narodov za okolje
Mr Olivier Deleuze, Director, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Olivier DELEUZE, direktor, Program Združenih narodov za okolje
Mr Olivier Lemerle
Seppa KALLIA
Mr Olli Rehn, member of the European Commission responsible for enlargement
Olliju REHNU, evropskemu komisarju za širitev.
Mr Olsson  presented two amendments that had been tabled by Ms Wahrolin:
G. OLSSON je predstavil dva amandmaja, ki ju je vložila ga. WAHROLIN:
Mr Olsson (Cat.3-SE)
Jan OLSSON (SE-3. kat.)
Mr Olsson (SE-Cat.3)
Jan OLSSON (SE-3. kat.)
Mr Olsson (SE-II)
Olsson (SE-II)
Mr Olsson (SE-III)
gospodje OLSSON (SV-III)
Mr Olsson (SE-III))
OLSSON (III-SV)
Mr Opran (Cat.
Marius Eugen OPRAN (RO- kat.
Mr Opran (RO- Cat.1)
Marius Eugen OPRAN (RO-1. kat.)
Mr Opran (RO-Cat 1)
Marius EUGEN OPRAN (RO-1. kat.)
Mr Opran (RO-Cat.
Marius Eugen OPRAN (RO–int.
Mr Opran (RO-Cat.1)
Marius EUGEN Opran (RO-1. kat.)
Mr Opran then spoke, setting out a number of objectives for the reform of the Committee's work and focusing in particular on the importance of establishing informal, personal links with the partner institutions.
OPRAN, ki je omenil nekaj ciljev reforme dejavnosti Odbora, zlasti pa je izpostavil pomen vzpostavljanja osebnih, neformalnih stikov s partnerskimi institucijami.
Mr Opran10 (RO-I) (Rule 62 – Varfalvi)
OPRAN (RO-I) (g. VARFALVI, člen 62)
Mr Oravec (SK-I)
HAMRO-DROTZ (FI-I)
Mr Oravec (SK-I)
Jan ORAVEC (SK-I)
Mr Oravec (SK-I)
Ján ORAVEC (SK-I)
Mr Oravec gave his views, as a member of the ad hoc group, on the content of the document.
Nastopil je še en član ad hoc skupine, Ján ORAVEC, ki je govoril o vsebini dokumenta.
Mr Osborn made the point that the document on action taken on opinions should not, in his view, be the end of the line, but should be followed up by the rapporteurs as the basis for any future discussions with the Commission.
OSBORN je poudaril, da dokument Spremljanje mnenj po njegovem mnenju ne bi smel pomeniti končne točke, marveč bi bilo treba to vprašanje še naprej spremljati na ravni poročevalcev Odbora, kar bi bila lahko podlaga za dialog s Komisijo.
Mr Osborn presented the resolution and recommended that the Bureau place it on the agenda for the November plenary session.
OSBORN je predstavil vsebino resolucije in predsedstvu priporočil, da ga uvrsti na dnevni red novembrskega plenarnega zasedanja.
Mr Osborn requested that the following sentence be added after the final sentence of item 3.2.d) which read "examining how effective the follow-up to Committee opinions actually was.": "After examining the situation, the secretary-general would propose practical measures with a view to discussion at forthcoming Bureau meetings".
doda naslednje besedilo: "Generalni sekretar bo po preučitvi stanja predlagal konkretne ukrepe, ki bodo pregledani na eni od naslednjih sej predsedstva".
Mr Osborn spoke of the need for all sections, and particularly the REX section, to adopt a cross-cutting approach in their work on the problem of sustainable development and international initiatives in this area.
OSBORN je poudaril, da morajo vse strokovne skupine, zlasti pa strokovna skupina REX, uporabiti medsektorski pristop pri svojem delu v zvezi s problematiko trajnostnega razvoja in mednarodnimi pobudami s tega področja.
Mr Osborn spoke, reiterating the request, on the basis of the document's contents, for rapporteurs to take further action on opinions once they were adopted, with the support of the administration.
OSBORN je na podlagi vsebine tega dokumenta znova poudaril, da bi morali poročevalci ob podpori uprave v večji meri spremljati že sprejeta mnenja.
Mr Osborn stressed the need for a more reliable source of financing than the unpredictable income from the emissions trading system.
OSBORN je poudaril, da so potrebni viri financiranja, ki so bolj zanesljivi kot nepredvidljivi prihodki iz sistema za trgovanje z emisijami.
Mr Osborn suggested that the final version of the document should contain a more comprehensive reference to the Sustainable Development Observatory's activity programme (page 17 of the document submitted to the Bureau).
OSBORN je predlagal, da se v dokončno različico dokumenta bolj obširno vključi sklicevanje na program dejavnosti opazovalne skupine za trajnostni razvoj (stran 17 dokumenta, predloženega predsedstvu).
Mr Osborn then proposed that the communication group should be involved in preparing the draft resolution for the UN climate summit.
OSBORN je nato predlagal, naj skupina za obveščanje sodeluje pri pripravi osnutka resolucije o vrhu Združenih narodov o podnebju.
Mr Osborn took the floor to urge the Committee to make better use of the quarterly publication of the "Reports on action taken in Response to opinions" document.
OSBORN je povedal, da bi Odbor moral imeti več koristi od objave četrtletnih poročil o "upoštevanju mnenj".
Mr Osborn would take part in the meeting under item 4 b) Climate change and energy: action plan.
Pri točki 4b) Podnebne spremembe in energija: akcijski načrt je sodeloval tudi g.
Mr Ostrowski (PL-I)
Krzysztof OSTROWSKI (PL-I)
Mr Ostrowski (PL-I) (Rule 62 - Mr Kliś)
Krzysztof OSTROWSKI (PL-I) (Tadeusz KLIŚ, člen 62)
Mr Ostrowski (PL-I) (Rule 62 - Šarmír)
Krzysztof OSTROWSKI (PL-I) (Igor ŠARMÍR, člen 62)
Mr Ostrowski (PL–I)
Krzysztof OSTROWSKI (PL-I)
Mr Pablo López Alvarez
Kurt MEIER
Mr Pablo Sanchez Centellas
Cillian LOHAN
Mr Padraig Kenny (for the rapporteur)
Padraig KENNY
Mr Padraig Kenny (for the rapporteur)
Pádraig KENNY
Mr Padraig Walshe (IE-II)
Padraig WALSHE (IE-II)
Mr Padraig Walshe (IE-III)
Padraig WALSHE (IE-III)
Mr Padraig Walshe (IE– III)
Padraig WALSHE (IE– III)
Mr Paetzold (Cat.1-DE)
Ulrich PAETZOLD (DE-1. kat.)
Mr Palenik (SK-III) (Rule 62-Cerna)
Palenik (SK-III) (Cerna, člen 62)
Mr Palenik drew the Commissioner's attention to current research on how European policies could be adapted to the needs of the new member countries and what means of action should be used to apply them in an optimal way.
Palenik komisarkino pozornost usmerja na tekoče raziskave o tem, kako bi bilo mogoče evropske politike prilagoditi potrebam novih držav članic in kakšna sredstva ukrepanja bi bilo treba uporabiti zanje, da bi jih čim bolje izkoristili.
Mr Palenik, the rapporteur for the draft opinion, believed that there were new factors that justified continuing with work on the opinion, and that the draft opinion should be sent back to the ECO Section.
PALENIK, poročevalec osnutka mnenja, je nato ocenil, da novi dejavniki upravičujejo nadaljevanje postopka in da se lahko osnutek mnenja znova predloži strokovni skupini ECO.
Mr Paleník congratulated the rapporteur on the opinion, which he found very realistic and complete.
PALENIK je čestital poročevalcu za mnenje, ki se mu zdi zelo realistično in dovršeno.
Mr Palmgren
g. PALMGREN
Mr Palmgren (FI-Gr.
Thomas PALMGREN (FI-III)
Mr Palmgren (FI-III)
Thomas PALMGREN (FI-III)
Mr Palmgren (FI-III)
Thomas PALMGREN (FI-III)
Mr Palmgren (FI–III)
Thomas PALMGREN (FI–III)
Mr Palmgren stressed that the phenomenon described in the opinion was not necessarily a problem in all Member States.
Palmgren je opozoril, da pojav, opisan v mnenju, ni nujno problem, ki se pojavlja v vseh državah članicah.
Mr Palmieri (IT/II)
Stefano PALMIERI (IT-II)
Mr Palmieri (IT–II)
Stefano PALMIERI (IT-II)
Mr Palmieri pointed out the risk that the platform might undermine the role of the EESC, and wondered about the reaction of the Committee's political authorities to the proposed arrangements for its consultation.
Stefano PALMIERI je poudaril tveganje, da bi platforma zmanjšala vlogo EESO, in se je vprašal, kako so se politični organi Odbora odzvali na predlagano organizacijo za posvetovanje.
Mr Panagiotis Gkofas
Renate HEINISCH
Mr Panagiotis Gkofas (EL-II)
Panagiotis GKOFAS (EL-II)
Mr Panero Florez (ES-I)
PANERO FLOREZ (I. sk.-ES)
Mr Paolo Bedoni (Gr.
Paola BEDONIJA (I. sk.
Mr Pariza Castanos felt that the ability to develop and grow was underpinned by positive dialogue and an understanding for other cultures, and that legislation and culture should not be mixed.
Gospod PARIZA CASTAÑOS je menil, da mora sposobnost za rast in razvoj temeljiti na pozitivnem dialogu in razumevanju drugih kultur ter da ne smemo mešati zakonodaje in kulture.
Mr Pariza Castaños (ES-Gr.
PARIZA CASTAÑOS (ES-II)
Mr Pariza Castaños (ES-II)
Luis-Miguel PARIZA-CASTAÑOS (ES-II)
Mr Pariza Castaños presented the section opinion.
PARIZA CASTAÑOS je skupščini predstavil mnenje strokovne skupine.
Mr Pariza Castaños raised the question of external borders, emphasising that Member States should adopt a credible, effective, legitimate and transparent external borders management policy and give Frontex more operational powers.
PARIZA CASTAÑOS je izpostavil vprašanje zunanjih meja in poudaril, da morajo države članice vzpostaviti verodostojno, učinkovito, legitimno in pregledno politiko njihovega upravljanja ter okrepiti operativne pristojnosti agencije Frontex.
Mr Pariza Castaños said that the prize was an award to the EESC as a whole for its work in the field.
PARIZA CASTAÑOS je dejal, da je ta nagrada priznanje celotnemu EESO in njegovemu delu na tem področju.
Mr Pariza Castaños supported the compromise, while suggesting that it should include references to previous opinions setting out the Committee's position.
G. PARIZA CASTAÑOS je podprl kompromisni predlog in predlagal, da se vanj vključijo sklici na predhodna mnenja, v katerih je predstavljeno stališče Odbora.
Mr Pariza Castaños supported the opinion wholeheartedly.
Sicer pa je v celoti podprl mnenje.
Mr Pascal Gabriel (for the rapporteur)
Pascal GABRIEL (za poročevalko)
Mr Passley (Cat.
PASSLEY (Kat.
Mr Pater (PL – III)
CHREN (SK-III)
Mr Pater (PL-III)
g. Pater (PL-III)
Mr Pater also believed that the RP panel should study the consequences of the Treaty of Lisbon while awaiting the document Mr Sepi had undertaken to send, in order to complete its work within the timeframe imposed, inter alia, by the Committee's renewal in October 2010.
PATER, ki se je strinjal, da bi komisija za poslovnik med čakanjem na dokument, ki ga je napovedal g.
Mr Pater announced that he nevertheless intended to submit a proposed revision of the Rule to the panel.
PATER je dejal, da kljub temu namerava predložiti predlog revizije tega člena.
Mr Pater asked for the item to be kept on the agenda since, at the last meeting, it had been decided to defer the discussion.
PATER, ki je zahteval, da ta točka ostane na dnevnem redu, in spomnil, da je bila razprava o tej točki odložena že na prejšnji seji.
Mr Pater asked if, at its next meeting, the panel could also consider the status of the observatories in drawing up opinions.
PATER je komisijo za poslovnik pozval, naj na svoji naslednji seji obravnava tudi vprašanje statusa opazovalnih skupin v procesu priprave mnenj.
Mr Pater asked that, when revising the rules, account be taken of the need to appoint rapporteurs and study groups quickly, without waiting for the meeting of the section.
PATER je zaprosil, da se pri reviziji določb upošteva nujnost hitrega imenovanja poročevalcev in oblikovanja študijskih skupin, brez čakanja na datum seje strokovne skupine.