natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Point (d) is replaced by the following:
točka (d) se nadomesti z naslednjo:
Point (d) is replaced by the following:
točka (d) se nadomesti z:
Point (d) is replaced by the following:
Točka (d) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
point (d) of paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
točka (d) odstavka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
Point (d) of paragraph 3 renders the fee waiver for holders of diplomatic and service passports mandatory
Na podlagi točke (d) odstavka 3 oprostitev vizumske takse za imetnike diplomatskih in službenih potnih listov postane obvezna.
Point (d) shall not prevent the provision of Common Equity Tier 1 instruments to a holder of relevant capital instruments in accordance with paragraph 2.
Točka (d) ne preprečuje zagotovitve instrumentov navadnega lastniškega temeljnega kapitala imetniku ustreznih kapitalskih instrumentov v skladu z odstavkom 2.
Point (d) shall only be applied where there are serious grounds for considering that the applicant is attempting to conceal relevant elements which would likely lead to a decision refusing to grant international protection and provided that the applicant has been given an effective opportunity to provide substantiated justifications for his actions.
Točka (d) se uporabi le, kadar obstajajo resni razlogi, da se šteje, da poskuša prosilec prikriti relevantne elemente, zaradi katerih bi bila verjetno sprejeta odločitev o zavrnitvi priznanja mednarodne zaščite, ter pod pogojem, da je imel prosilec dejansko možnost, da utemeljeno pojasni svoja dejanja.
Point (e) confirms the exclusion of arbitration agreements and agreements on the choice of court as the majority of the replies to the Green Paper felt that the former was already covered by satisfactory international regulations and that the question of the law applicable to the choice-of-forum clause should ultimately be settled by the Brussels I Regulation.
Točka (e) potrjuje izključitev arbitražnih dogovorov in dogovorov o izbiri sodišča, saj je v večini odgovorov na vprašanja iz Zelene knjige ugotovljeno, da so arbitražni dogovori že zadovoljivo urejeni na mednarodni ravni, vprašanje uporabe prava za klavzulo o izbiri sodišča pa bi moralo biti dokončno rešeno z Uredbo „Bruselj I“.
Point (e) contains a definition of the term “proxy” which currently does not have an identical meaning in all Member States.
Točka (e) vsebuje opredelitev pojma „pooblastilo“, ki trenutno nima enakega pomena v vseh državah članicah.
Point (e) is amended as follows:
Točka (e) se spremeni:
point (e) is deleted;
točka (e) se črta;
point (e) is replaced by the following:
točka (e) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (e) of paragraph 3 renders the fee waiver for participants aged 25 years or less in seminars, conferences, sports, cultural or educational events, organised by non-profit organisations mandatory, thus doing away with optional fee waiver for this group and the mandatory fee waiver for representatives aged 25 years or less in seminars, conferences, sports, cultural or educational events, organised by non-profit organisations.
Na podlagi točke (e) odstavka 3 postane obvezna oprostitev vizumske takse za 25 let stare ali mlajše udeležence seminarjev, konferenc, športnih, kulturnih ali izobraževalnih dogodkov, ki jih organizirajo neprofitne organizacije, s čimer se odpravita možna oprostitev vizumske takse za to skupino oseb in obvezna oprostitev vizumske takse za predstavnike neprofitnih organizacij, starih 25 let ali mlajših, ki se udeležujejo seminarjev, konferenc, športnih, kulturnih ali izobraževalnih dogodkov, ki jih organizirajo neprofitne organizacije
Point (e) of paragraph 5 is amended as a consequence of the amendment of Article 9.
V odstavku 5 se spremeni točka (e) kot posledica spremembe člena 9.
Point (e) of paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
točka (e) odstavka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (f) combines the rules of point (e) and the company-law aspects of point (f) of the Convention.
V točki (f) so v enotno pravilo združeni točka (e) in elementi v zvezi s pravom družb iz točke (f) Konvencije.
point (f) is modified as follows:
točka (f) se spremeni:
point (f) is replaced by the following:
točka (f) se nadomesti z naslednjo:
point (f) is replaced by the following:
točka (f) se nadomesti z:
Point (f) is replaced by the following:
Točka (f) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (g) concerns the freedom of end-users in the information society.
Točka (g) se nanaša na svobodo končnega uporabnika v informacijski družbi.
Point (g) is inserted:
vstavi se točka (g):
Point (g) is replaced by the following:
Točka (g) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (g) of paragraph 1 is amended as a consequence of the amendment of Article 38.
V odstavku 1 se spremeni točka (g) kot posledica spremembe člena 38.
point (g)(i) is replaced by the following:
točka (g)(i) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
point (h) (ii) is deleted.
točka (h) (ii) se črta;
point (h) and (i) are replaced by the following:
točki (h) in (i) se nadomestita:
point (h) is replaced by the following:
se točka (h) nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (h) is replaced by the following:
točka (h) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (h) is replaced by the following:
točka (h) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (h) is replaced by the following:
Točka (h) se nadomesti z:
point (h) of paragraph 7 is replaced by the following:
v odstavku 7 se točka (h) nadomesti z naslednjim:
point (i) is replaced by the following:
se točka (i) nadomesti z naslednjim:
point (i) is replaced by the following:
točka (i) se nadomesti z naslednjo:
point (i) is replaced by the following:
točka i) se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
Point (i) of section 1 is replaced by the following:
točka (i) oddelka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (i) proposes a specific rule for pre-contractual obligations which, according to the contributions, confirms the analysis of the majority of legal systems in the Union and the restrictive concept of the contract adopted by the Court of Justice in its judgments concerning Article 5(1) of the Brussels I Regulation: for the purposes of private international law, they would be treated as a matter of tort/delict and governed by the future Rome II instrument.
V točki (i) je predlagana opredelitev predpogodbenih obligacijskih razmerij, ki glede na prejete prispevke potrjuje analizo večine pravnih sistemov v Uniji in omejevalni koncept pogodbe, ki ga je sprejelo Sodišče v okviru svoje sodne prakse v zvezi s členom 5(1) Uredbe „Bruselj I“: za potrebe mednarodnega zasebnega prava bodo ta razmerja opredeljena kot deliktna in jih bo urejal prihodnji instrument „Rim II“.
Point (j) is replaced by the following:
točka (j) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (k) is replaced by the following:
točka (k) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (m) is replaced by the following:
točka (m) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
point (n) is deleted.
točka (n) se črta.
Point (q) is added:
Doda se točka (q):
Point 1 (a) (vii) is deleted as a consequence of the abolition of the requirements on travel medical insurance.
Črta se točka 1(a)(vii) kot posledica odprave zahtev po potovalnem zdravstvenem zavarovanju.
Point 1 and point 5
Točki 1 in 5
Point 1 contains the same change as the one proposed for the Third Directive.
Točka 1 vsebuje enake spremembe, kot so bile predlagane za Tretjo direktivo.
Point 1 is amended as follows:
Točka 1 se spremeni na naslednji način:
Point 1 is replaced by the following:
točka 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point 1 is replaced by the following:
Točka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point 1 modifies Article 3 of Roaming Regulation by adding the possibility for the parties to a wholesale agreement to waive the application of maximum wholesale caps provided in Articles 7, 9 and 12 of the Roaming Regulation.
točka 1 spreminja člen 3 uredbe o gostovanju z dodajanjem možnosti, da stranke veleprodajnega dogovora opustijo uporabo najvišjih veleprodajnih cen iz členov 7, 9 in 12 uredbe o gostovanju;
Point 1 of Annex IX is replaced by the text in Annex I to this Regulation.
Točka 1 Priloge IX se nadomesti z besedilom v Prilogi I k tej uredbi.
Point 1 of Article 3 mirrors the changes proposed for the Third and the Sixth Directives with a view to the disclosure of the draft terms of merger.
Člen 3(1) odraža spremembe, predlagane za Tretjo in Šesto direktivo, v zvezi z razkritjem načrta združitve.
Point 1 of the Annex amends Annex I of Regulation 883/2004, which concerns advances of maintenance payments (Part 1) and special childbirth and adoption allowances (Part 2).
Točka 1 Priloge spreminja Prilogo I k Uredbi 883/2004, ki zadeva predujme preživnin (del 1) in posebne dodatke ob rojstvu in posvojitvi otroka (del 2).
Point 1 shall not apply to fishing operations conducted solely for the purpose of scientific investigation which are carried out with the authorisation and under the authority of the Member States or Member States concerned and which aim at developing new technical measures to reduce the incidental capture or killing of cetaceans.
Točka 1 se ne uporablja za ribolovne operacije, ki se opravljajo zgolj za namene znanstvenih preiskav, ki se izvajajo z dovoljenjem in pod vodstvom zadevne države članice ali držav članic, njihov cilj pa je razvijanje novih tehničnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje naključnega ulova oziroma ubijanja kitov in delfinov.
Point 1 should correspond with the main body of the text (point 3.2)
Besedilo v točki 1 se mora skladati z besedilom v glavnem besedilu (točka 3.2).
Point 1 – Amend point 1 as follows:
1: Točka 1 – Naslov se spremeni tako:
Point 1(10)
Točka 1, alinea 10
Point 1(9)
Točka 1(9)
Point 1(a) specifies the categories of persons who are entitled to health care under Netherlands legislation.
V točki 1(a) so opredeljene kategorije oseb, ki so upravičene do zdravstvenega zavarovanja v okviru nizozemske zakonodaje.
Point 1(b) sets out how to determine income if a parent has not worked in Sweden at all during the reference period.
Točka 1(b) določa način določitve dohodka, če roditelj v referenčnem obdobju na Švedskem sploh ni bil zaposlen.
Point 1(b) specifies the institution with which such persons must be insured.
V točki 1(b) je opredeljena ustanova, pri kateri morajo biti te osebe zavarovane.
Point 1(c) of Chapter I of Part 1 of Annex II
Točka 1(c) poglavja I dela 1 Priloge II
Point 1(c) permits the levying of premiums or contributions on such insured persons and members of their family.
Točka 1(c) omogoča obračunanje premij ali prispevkov tem zavarovanim osebam in njihovim družinskim članom.
Point 1(d) concerns the consequences of delays in registering for insurance.
Točka 1(d) zadeva posledice prepozne registracije za zavarovanje.
Point 1(e) shall not apply to terms by which a supplier of financial service reserves the right to terminate unilaterally an open-ended contract without notice, provided that the supplier is required to inform the other contracting party or parties thereof immediately.
Točka 1(e) se ne uporablja za pogoje, v skladu s katerimi si ponudnik finančnih storitev pridrži pravico, da enostransko in brez odpovednega roka odpove pogodbo za nedoločen čas, pod pogojem, da se od ponudnika zahteva, da o tem takoj obvesti drugo pogodbenico ali pogodbenice.
Point 1(e) specifies the benefits in kind to which a person insured in another Member State is entitled during a period of stay or period of residence in the Netherlands.
Točka 1(e) opredeljuje storitve, do katerih je upravičena oseba, zavarovana v drugi državi članici, v obdobju bivanja na Nizozemskem.
Point 1(f) lists the Netherlands benefits and pensions that enable the recipients to be considered as pensioners within the meaning of the Regulation, thus enabling them to benefit from the provisions of the sickness chapter of Regulation 1408/71.
V točki 1(f) so naštete nizozemske dajatve in pokojnine, ki prejemnikom omogoča, da se v okviru Uredbe obravnavajo kot upokojenci, kar jim omogoča koriščenje določb poglavja o bolezni Uredbe št. 1408/71.
Point 1(g) can be deleted as the no-claims refund has been replaced with the introduction of a mandatory risk excess into the Dutch health insurance system.
Točka 1(g) se lahko črta, saj so bila povračila dajatev, za katere zahtevki niso bili vloženi, nadomeščena z uvedbo obveznega osebnega prispevka v nizozemski sistem zdravstvenega zavarovanja.
Point 1(g) clarifies that the no-claims refund is to be considered a sickness benefit in cash for the purpose of the Regulation.
V točki 1(g) je razloženo, da se za namen Uredbe povračilo dajatev, za katere zahtevki niso bili vloženi, šteje kot denarna dajatev za bolezen.
Point 1(g) shall not apply to
Točka 1(g) se ne uporablja za:
Point 1(i) is replaced by the following:
Točka 1(i) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point 1(k) shall not apply to
Točka 1(k) se ne uporablja za:
Point 1.
Točka I.
Point 1.1 ("Introduction")
Točka 1.1 (Uvod)
Point 1.1 (amendment 1)
Točka 1.1 (amandma 1)
Point 1.1 (amendment 4)
Točka 1.1 (amandma 4)
Point 1.1 (new point 1.2)
Točka 1.1 (nova točka 1.2)
Point 1.1 - Amend as follows:
Točka 1.1 – Besedilo se spremeni:
Point 1.1 and 3.1 (voted together)
Točki 1.1 in 3.1 (skupno glasovanje)
Point 1.1 of the opinion already states that the Russian Federation is a strategic partner of the European Union, which adequately conveys the content of point 1.3.
Že v točki 1.1 mnenja je povedano, da je Ruska federacija strateški partner Evropske unije, zato je točka 1.3 odveč.
Point 1.1 on page 3:
Točka 1.1 na strani 3:
Point 1.1 shall not apply to fishing operations conducted solely for the purpose of scientific investigation which are carried out with the authorisation and under the authority of the Member States or Member States concerned and which aim at developing new technical measures to reduce the incidental capture or killing of cetaceans.
Točka 1.1 se ne uporablja za ribolovne operacije, ki se opravljajo zgolj za namene znanstvenih preiskav, ki se izvajajo z dovoljenjem in pod vodstvom zadevne države članice ali držav članic, njihov cilj pa je razvijanje novih tehničnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje naključnega ulova oziroma ubijanja kitov in delfinov.
Point 1.1, 4th phrase:
Točka 1.1, 4. stavek
Point 1.1, last sentence:
Točka 1.1, zadnji stavek
Point 1.1.
Točka 1.1
Point 1.1.1 was proposed to be amended by two changes in one amendment.
Za spremembo točke 1.1.1 sta bili predlagani dve spremembi v enem amandmaju.
Point 1.1.10
Točka 1.1.10
Point 1.1.12
Točka 1.1.12
Point 1.1.13
Točka 1.1.13
Point 1.1.16 – (new point)
Točka 1.1.16 (nova točka)
Point 1.1.2 on page 3: Add a title:
Točka 1.1 na strani 3; doda se naslov:
Point 1.1.2, add a new phrase at the end of the 2nd para.
Točka 1.1.2; na koncu drugega odstavka na str.
Point 1.1.3
Točka 1.1.3
Point 1.1.4
Točka 1.1.4
Point 1.1.7
Točka 1.1.7
Point 1.1.9
Točka 1.1.9
Point 1.10 (Am.
Točka 1.10 (am.2)
Point 1.10 (Amendment 1)
Točka 1.10 (amandma 1)
Point 1.10 (amendment 3)
Točka 1.10 – Amandma 3
Point 1.10 (amendment 7)
Točka 1.10 (amandma 7)
Point 1.10 Amendment 2
Točka 1.10 – Amandma 2
Point 1.10 becomes 1.11
Točka 1.10 postane točka 1.11
Point 1.10.3 - Amend as follows:
Točka 1.10.3 – Spremeni se tako:
Point 1.10.3:
Točka 1.10.3
Point 1.11 - 5th bullet point (iii)
Točka 1.11, peta alinea, odstavek iii)
Point 1.11 Amendment 6
Točka 1.11 – Amandma 6
Point 1.11:
Točka 1.11:
Point 1.12, 3rd dash
Točka 1.12, 3. alinea
Point 1.13 – Insert new text:
Točka 1.13 – Doda se:
Point 1.13.
Točka 1.13
Point 1.13:
Točka 1.13
Point 1.14 and 1.15
Točki 1.14 in 1.15
Point 1.15
Točka 1.15:
Point 1.15 (Am.
Točka 1.15 (am.1)
Point 1.15 (Amendment 1)
Točka 1.15 (amandma 1)
Point 1.15 (new):
Nova točka 1.16
Point 1.15 – Delete the whole point:
Točka 1.15 – Točka se črta:
Point 1.15, footnote 2
Točka 1.15, opomba pod črto 2
Point 1.15:
Točka 1.15
Point 1.16
Točka 1.16
Point 1.16 (Amendment 2)
Točka 1.16 (amandma 2)
Point 1.16 - After point 1.16 add an additional point 1.17:
Točka 1.16 – Za točko 1.16 se doda nova točka 1.17:
Point 1.16.1
Točka 1.16.1
Point 1.16.2
Točka 1.16.2
Point 1.17 (Amendment 3)
Točka 1.17 (amandma 3)
Point 1.18
Točka 1.18
Point 1.19a
Točka 1.19 a
Point 1.1:
Točka 1.1
Point 1.1:
Točka 1.1:
Point 1.2 (Amendment 1)
Točka 1.2 (amandma 1)
Point 1.2 (CESE 1580/2011 Am.
Točka 1.2 (CESE 1580/2011 am.
Point 1.2 (or point 1.3 if amendment 7 is accepted):
Točka 1.2 (če bo sprejet amandma 7, postane točka 1.3):
Point 1.2 and 3.3 (voted together)
Točki 1.2 in 3.3 (skupno glasovanje)
Point 1.2 fifth indent
Točka 1.2, peta alinea
Point 1.2 first indent
Točka 1.2, prva alinea
Point 1.2 fourth indent
Točka 1.2, četrta alinea
Point 1.2 i)
Točka 1.2 i)
Point 1.2 introductory wording
Točka 1.2, uvodno besedilo
Point 1.2 k)
Točka 1.2 k)
Point 1.2 second indent
Točka 1.2, druga alinea
Point 1.2 third indent
Točka 1.2, tretja alinea
Point 1.2 – Amend as follows:
Točka 1.2 – Besedilo se spremeni:
Point 1.2, 5th indent
Točka 1.2, 5. alinea
Point 1.2, indents 8, 9 and 10
Točka 1.2, alinee 8, 9 in 10
Point 1.2, third indent
Točka 1.2, alinea 3
Point 1.2.1.1
Točka 1.2.1.1
Point 1.2.1.6
Točka 1.2.1.6
Point 1.2.2 (Care workers)
Točka 1.2.2
Point 1.2.2 (or point 1.3.2 if amendment 7 is accepted)
Točka 1.2.2 (če bo sprejet amandma 7, postane točka 1.3.2)
Point 1.2.6
Točka 1.2.6
Point 1.2.7
Točka 1.2.7
Point 1.2.:
Točka 1.2
Point 1.22
Točka: 1.22
Point 1.22.
Točka 1.22
Point 1.25
Točka 1.25
Point 1.25
Točka 1.25:
Point 1.3
Točka 1.3:
Point 1.3 (Amendment 1)
Točka 1.3 (amandma 1)
Point 1.3 (Amendment 2)
Točka 1.3 (amandma 2)
Point 1.3 (amendment 5)
Točka 1.3 (amandma 5)
Point 1.3 (Amendment 7)
Točka 1.3 (AM 7)
Point 1.3 (new point 1.6)
Točka 1.3 (nova točka 1.6)
Point 1.3 - Amend as follows:
Točka 1.3 - Spremeni se tako:
Point 1.3 - Amend as follows:
Točka 1.3 – Spremeni se tako:
Point 1.3 Amendment 4
Točka 1.3 – Amandma 4
Point 1.3 contains a strong statement saying that "it soon became apparent that the Maastricht Treaty, Article 129a of the Treaty was an inadequate basis for developing a fully-fledged policy in this field".
Kmalu se je izkazalo, da ne zadošča kot podlaga za razvoj posebne politike na tem področju.”
Point 1.3 contains a strong statement saying that “it soon became apparent that the Maastricht Treaty, Article 129a of the Treaty was an inadequate basis for developing a fully-fledged policy in this field.”
Kmalu se je izkazalo, da ne zadošča kot podlaga za razvoj posebne politike na tem področju.”
Point 1.3 – Language correction
Točka 1.3 – Jezikovni popravek
Point 1.3(1)
Točka 1.3, prvi odstavek
Point 1.3, 4th bullet point
Točka 1.3, četrta alineja
Point 1.3, add the following:
Točka 1.3, doda se:
Point 1.3, first recommendation:
Točka 1.3, prva alinea
Point 1.3, footnote 3
Točka 1.3, opomba 3
Point 1.3, page 3, amend as follows:
Točka 1.3 se spremeni tako:
Point 1.3.
Točka 1.3
Point 1.3.1 first indent
Točka 1.3.1, prva alinea
Point 1.3.1 fourth indent
Točka 1.3.1, četrta alinea
Point 1.3.1 introductory wording
Točka 1.3.1, uvodno besedilo
Point 1.3.1 second indent
Točka 1.3.1, druga alinea
Point 1.3.1 third indent
Točka 1.3.1, tretja alinea
Point 1.3.14
Točka 1.3.14
Point 1.3.15
Točka 1.3.15
Point 1.3.2, paragraph 2
Točka 1.3.2, drugi odstavek
Point 1.3.3
Točka 1.3.3:
Point 1.3.4
Točka 1.3.4
Point 1.3.5
Točka 1.3.5
Point 1.3.7
Točka 1.3.7
Point 1.3.8
Točka 1.3.8
Point 1.3: re-write
Točka 1.3 se spremeni tako:
Point 1.4
Točka 1.4:
Point 1.4
Točka 1.5
Point 1.4  (Amendment tabled by Mr Ribbe)
Točka 1.4 (amandma je vložil g.
Point 1.4 (Amendment 2)
Točka 1.4 (amandma 2)
Point 1.4 (Amendment 3)
Točka 1.4 (amandma 3)
Point 1.4 (Amendment 6)
Točka 1.4 (AM 6)
Point 1.4 (Amendment 9)
Točka 1.4 (AM 9)
Point 1.4 (new point 1.7)
Točka 1.4 (nova točka 1.7)
Point 1.4 and 1.5
Točki 1.4 in 1.5.
Point 1.4 contains a strong statement saying that "the non-application of this legal basis over the years highlighted its inadequacies as a suitable and effective legal basis for promoting a genuine policy for the protection of consumer interests at Community level."
Točka 1.4 vsebuje odločno trditev: “Neuporaba te pravne podlage v zadnjih letih potrjuje, da ni ustrezna in učinkovita pravna podlaga za spodbujanje dejanske politike zaščite interesov potrošnikov na ravni Skupnosti.”
Point 1.4 contains a strong statement saying that “the non-application of this legal basis over the years highlighted its inadequacies as a suitable and effective legal basis for promoting a genuine policy for the protection of consumer interests at Community level.”
Točka 1.4 vsebuje odločno trditev: “Neuporaba te pravne podlage v zadnjih letih potrjuje, da ni ustrezna in učinkovita pravna podlaga za spodbujanje dejanske politike zaščite interesov potrošnikov na ravni Skupnosti.”
Point 1.4 – Amendment 1
Točka 1.4 – Amandma 1
Point 1.4 – second bullet point:
Točka 1.4, druga alinea:
Point 1.4 – third bullet point:
Točka 1.4, zadnja alinea:
Point 1.4, first paragraph
Točka 1.4, prvi odstavek
Point 1.4, first paragraph:
Točka 1.4, prva alinea:
Point 1.4, last sentence
Točka 1.4 – zadnji stavek
Point 1.4, second paragraph
Točka 1.4, drugi odstavek
Point 1.4.
Točka 1.4
Point 1.4.5
Točka 1.4.5
Point 1.4.8
Točka 1.4.8
Point 1.4.9
Točka 1.4.9
Point 1.4:
Točka 1.4:
Point 1.5
Točka 1.5, druga vrstica:
Point 1.5
Točka 1.5:
Point 1.5 (Amendment 1)
Točka 1.5 (amandma 1)
Point 1.5 (Amendment 3, tabled by Ms Drbalová)
Točka 1.5 (amandma 3, vložila ga.
Point 1.5 - first paragraph
Točka 1.5 – prvi odstavek
Point 1.5 A) 3)
Točka 1.5 A) 3)
Point 1.5 B.2)
Točka 1.5 B) 2)
Point 1.5 contains a strong statement saying that "the changes introduced by the new Article 153 of the Amsterdam Treaty did not address these shortcomings.
Točka 1.5 vsebuje odločno trditev: “Spremembe novega člena 153 Amsterdamske pogodbe ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti niso uspele odpraviti.
Point 1.5 contains a strong statement saying that “the changes introduced by the new Article 153 of the Amsterdam Treaty did not address these shortcomings.
Točka 1.5 vsebuje odločno trditev: “Spremembe novega člena 153 Amsterdamske pogodbe ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti niso uspele odpraviti.
Point 1.5 – 3rd sentence
Točka 1.5 – 3. stavek
Point 1.5 – Amend as follows:
Točka 1.5 – Spremeni se tako:
Point 1.5 – Amendment 2
Točka 1.5 – Amandma 2
Point 1.5 – Delete text:
Točka 1.5 – Črta se:
Point 1.5 – last sentence
Točka 1.5 – zadnji stavek
Point 1.5, 2nd indent (1st amendment)
Točka 1.5, druga alinea (amandma 1):
Point 1.5, 2nd indent (2nd amendment)
Točka 1.5, druga alinea (amandma 2):
Point 1.5, 2nd indent (3rd amendment)
Točka 1.5, druga alinea (amandma 3):
Point 1.5, 2nd indent (4th amendment)
Točka 1.5, druga alinea (amandma 4):
Point 1.5, page 4, amend as follows:
Točka 1.5 se spremeni tako:
Point 1.5, second bullet point
Točka 1.5., druga alinea
Point 1.5.
Točka 1.5
Point 1.6 (3rd indent)
Točka 1.6 (3. alineja)
Point 1.6 (7th indent)
Točka 1.6 (7. alineja )
Point 1.6 (amendment 1)
Točka 1.6 (amandma 1)
Point 1.6 (amendment 2)
Točka 1.6 – Amandma 2
Point 1.6 Amendment 1
Točka 1.6 – Amandma 1
Point 1.6 delete.
Točka 1.6 se črta.
Point 1.6, new last indent
Točka 1.6, zadnja alineja
Point 1.6, page 4, amend as follows:
Točka 1.6 se spremeni tako:
Point 1.6, page 4, new paragraph:
Točka 1.6, stran 4, nov odstavek:
Point 1.7 (amendment 2)
Točka 1.7 (amandma 2)
Point 1.7 (amendment 6)
Točka 1.7 (amandma 6)
Point 1.7 (Amendment 9)
Točka 1.7 (amandma 9)
Point 1.7 (new)
Točka 1.7
Point 1.7 - Amend as follows:
Točka 1.7 se spremeni tako:
Point 1.7 should become point 1.3
Točko 1.7 bi bilo treba preštevilčiti v točko 1.3.
Point 1.7 – Amend as follows:
Točka 1.7 – Besedilo se spremeni:
Point 1.7, page 4, amend as follows:
Točka 1.7 se spremeni tako:
Point 1.7:
Točka 1.7
Point 1.7:
Točka 1.7:
Point 1.7: delete paragraphs a., b. and c.
V točki 1.7 se črta besedilo pod a), b) in c)
Point 1.8
1. Točka 1.8
Point 1.8 (Amendment 2)
Točka 1.8 (amandma 2)
Point 1.8 - Amend as follows:
Točka 1.8 - Spremeni se tako:
Point 1.8 Amendment 5
Točka 1.8 – Amandma 5
Point 1.8 – amendment presented by Mr Iozia
Točka 1.8 – amandma je predstavil g.
Point 1.8.
Točka 1.8
Point 1.8.2
Točka 1.8.2
Point 1.8.3
Točka 1.8.3
Point 1.8:
Točka 1.8:
Point 1.9 (amendment 3)
Točka 1.9 (amandma 3)
Point 1.9 having been rejected, point 6.7 falls.
Ker je bil amandma k točki 1.9 zavrnjen, je amandma k točki 6.7 brezpredmeten.
point 1.9 rather than point 2.4
odstavek 1.9 namesto odstavek 2.4;
Point 1.9 – Amend text:
Točka 1.9 – Spremeni se tako:
Point 1.9 – to be consistent with point 4.7:
Točka 1.9 – točka se uskladi s točko 4.7:
POINT 10
TOČKA 10