natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mr Lustenhouwer clarified that he agreed to specify in his proposal that the bureau members would have to come from 6 different Member States and added that he would not want any former group membership reflected there, as the association was not a copy of the EESC structure.
Lustenhouwer je pojasnil, da bo v svojem predlogu dodal klavzulo, da morajo biti člani predsedstva iz šestih različnih držav članic, in dodal, da ne želi, da se v predsedstvu odraža nekdanje članstvo v skupinah, saj združenje ni kopija strukture EESO.
Mr Lustenhouwer pointed out that the secretariat had already contacted all former members about this issue, and he encouraged those present to pay their membership fee.
Lustenhouwer je poudaril, da je tajništvo glede tega že stopilo v stik z vsemi nekdanjimi člani, in prisotne spodbudil, naj plačajo članarino.
Mr Malosse and Mr Wilms, who was responsible for financial matters, were open to possible solutions.
Wilms sta izrazila pripravljenost za iskanje morebitnih rešitev.
Mr Malosse asked for the opinion on public procurement (INT/290) to be removed from the agenda so it could be redrafted.
MALOSSE je zahteval, da se mnenje o javnih naročilih (INT/290) umakne z dnevnega reda, ker ga je treba predelati.
Mr Malosse drew attention to Rule 10 of the Rules of Procedure, detailing the Budget Group's role in monitoring compliance with the principles of sound management of financial resources, and thus felt that that comments made in the report were perfectly legitimate.
MALOSSE je opozoril na člen 10 poslovnika, ki podrobno opisuje vlogo skupine za proračun pri nadzoru upoštevanja načela dobrega upravljanja finančnih virov, in menil, da so pripombe v poročilu popolnoma legitimne.
Mr Malosse endorsed the idea of asking an external body or institution such as the European Parliament to audit past budget management, while recalling that the 2010 budget should mark a new turn in budget governance.
MALOSSE je odobraval načrt, da bi za revizijo preteklega upravljanja proračuna zadolžili zunanji organ ali institucijo kot npr. Evropski parlament, pri čemer je opozoril, da bi moral proračun za leto 2010 pomeniti prelom na področju proračunskega upravljanja.
Mr Malosse highlighted the need to clarify the concept of institutional obligations, and even whether it had any merit, in view of the corresponding reallocation of appropriations in line with the needs of Committee bodies.
Henri MALOSSE je poudaril, da je treba pojasniti pojem "institucionalne obveznosti" in celo njegovo upravičenost, in sicer zaradi prerazporeditve tozadevnih odobritev glede na potrebe organov Odbora.
Mr Malosse pointed out that the three groups would contribute to the proposals for the Committee's strategic development; he emphasised the importance of concentrating on new human and financial resources allocated to operating activities.
G. MALOSSE je povedal, da bodo vse tri skupine prispevale k predlogom za strateški razvoj Odbora; poudaril je pomen usmerjanja novih razpoložljivih človeških in finančnih sredstev v operativne dejavnosti.
Mr Malosse queried the status and distribution of the document given out by the president and Mr Kleemann expressed concern about the impact these proposals would have on the current provisions for members' travel.
MALOSSE, ki je postavil vprašanje o statusu in razdelitvi dokumenta, ki ga je razdelil predsednik, in g. KLEEMANN, ki je izrazil zaskrbljenost glede vpliva teh predlogov na pogoje za potovanja članov.
Mr Malosse said a review of the cooperation protocol was needed to give fresh momentum to the EESC in its role as a consultative partner of the other EU institutions.
MALOSSE je poudaril, da je nujna revizija protokola o sodelovanju, ki bo EESO dala nov zagon v njegovi vlogi sogovornika z drugimi evropskimi institucijami.
Mr Malosse suggested a compromise solution, amending the text so that it simply called for effective application.
Malosse je predlagal sporazumno rešitev, pri čemer naj bi besedilo spremenili tako, da se zahteva le učinkovita uporaba.
Mr Malosse supported the notion of innovative initiatives to raise awareness and stressed the need to inform the public about the citizens' right of initiative enshrined in the new treaty.
MALOSSE podprl idejo o inovativnih pobudah za izboljšanje ozaveščenosti in poudaril potrebo po obveščanju javnosti o pravici do državljanske pobude, ki jo predvideva nova pogodba.
Mr Malosse then announced that Group I was reserving the right to abstain or vote against the opinion during the discussion in plenary.
G. MALOSSE je izjavil, da si v tem primeru I. skupina pridržuje pravico vzdržati se glasovanja o mnenju ali ga zavrniti med obravnavo na plenarnem zasedanju.
Mr Malosse then took the floor, pointing out that the Lisbon Treaty offered considerable potential for increasing the democratic legitimacy of the EU institutions and enhancing civil society participation in the decision-making process.
MALOSSE, ki je poudaril, da ponuja Lizbonska pogodba veliko možnosti za povečanje demokratične legitimnosti institucij EU in za večje sodelovanje civilne družbe v postopku odločanja.
Mr Malosse went through the priorities for the next stage of the negotiations, which had been established at the enlarged presidency meeting in Bruges, namely: the need to focus on the political dimension of the agreement, clarifying the favourable position of the EP on maintaining and strengthening the EESC's role; decoupling the negotiating process from the timetable for renewing the EESC's cooperation agreement with the CoR in autumn 2014; the preference for a tripartite agreement involving the EESC, the EP and the CoR; and finally, the budgetary aspect, on which discussions were continuing.
Zatem je naštel prednostne naloge nadaljevanja pogajanj, ki so bile določene v okviru razširjenega ožjega predsedstva v Bruggeju: poudarek na političnem sklopu sporazuma, ki bi vseboval navedbo o naklonjenem stališču EP glede ohranitve in okrepitve vloge EESO; ločitev pogajalskega procesa od časovnega načrta obnovitve sporazuma med EESO in OR jeseni 2014; dajanje prednosti tristranskemu sporazumu med EESO, EP in OR in nazadnje proračunski sklop, za katerega se pogajanja nadaljujejo.
Mr MANGIN
G. MANGIN
Mr Manoliu (I-RO)
MANOLIU (I-RO)
Mr Matoušek (CZ-II)
g. Matoušek (CZ-II)
Mr Mačiulis (LT-III)
Vitas MAČIULIS (LT – III. sk.)
Mr McDonogh (I-IE)
g. McDonogh (I-IE)
Mr McDonogh (IE-I)
Thomas McDONOGH (IE-I)
Mr McDonogh (Rule 62 - Liska) (IE-I)
Thomas McDonogh (Jan Liska, člen 62) (IE-I)
Mr Metzler, from Group III, criticised the fact that the documents had not been made available to the REX section president, who he felt should also assume responsibility for the financial aspects.
METZLER (III. skupina) pa je kritiziral dejstvo, da dokumenti niso bili na voljo predsedniku strokovne skupine REX, in dodal, da bi slednji ravno tako moral biti odgovoren za finančne vidike.
Mr Meynent (FR-II)
Denis MEYNENT (FR-II)
Mr Michel Derdevet (for the rapporteur)
Michel DERDEVET (za poročevalca)
Mr Mira (PT-I)
Luís MIRA (PT-I)
Mr Mitov (BG-II)
Veselin MITOV (BG – II. sk.)
Mr Mitov (BG-II)
Veselin MITOV (BG-II)
Mr Mitov (II-BG)
MITOV (II-BG)
Mr Moos was concerned about the risk of a shift of power on the continent if the United Kingdom left the EU.
Christian MOOS je izrazil zaskrbljenost zaradi tveganja, da na evropski celini pride do premika moči, če Združeno kraljestvo zapusti Evropsko unijo.
Mr Mordant (BE-II)
André MORDANT (BE-II)
Mr Morgan (UK-I)
g. MORGAN (UK-I)
Mr Mulewicz (PL-I)
Jaroslaw Mulewicz (PL-I)
Mr Narro thanked the speakers and was sorry there was not enough time to reply to all of them.
NARRO se je zahvalil govorcem in z obžalovanjem dejal, da ni dovolj časa, da bi odgovorili na vsa vprašanja.
Mr Nicosevici (RO-III)
Radu NICOSEVICI (RO-III)
Mr Nielsen (DK-III)
g. Nielsen (DK-III)
Mr Nilsson also drew Members' attention to the proposal by some European civil society organisations that a civil society Charter be drawn up in order to clarify the relationships between European Institutions and those organisations, based on the UK experience.
Nilsson je člane opozoril tudi na predlog nekaterih evropskih organizacij civilne družbe o oblikovanju listine civilne družbe, da bi se pojasnili odnosi med evropskimi institucijami in temi organizacijami na podlagi izkušenj Velike Britanije.
Mr Nilsson also reported that he had attended a high-level conference in Brussels on the launch of the EU-China partnership for sustainable urbanisation, and the cross-border Lithuanian-Latvian conference on the implications of CAP inequalities under the aegis of the NAT section.
NILSSON je omenil tudi, da se je v Bruslju udeležil konference na visoki ravni o vzpostavitvi partnerstva med EU in Kitajsko na področju trajnostne urbanizacije ter čezmejne konference Litve in Latvije, posvečene posledicam neenakosti v okviru SKP, ki je potekala pod vodstvom strokovne skupine NAT.
Mr Nilsson also spoke, assuring the two preceding speakers that their concerns could be taken into account in the draft revision of the Rules of Procedure currently under discussion.
NILSSON, ki je dvema predhodnicama zagotovil, da se lahko njuni pomisleki upoštevajo v okviru revizije poslovnika, o kateri poteka razprava.
Mr Nilsson and Mr Hernández Bataller believed that the rapporteur could not be forced to present an opinion against his own will and stressed that the INT section had approved the withdrawal.
NILSSON in g. HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER sta bila mnenja, da poročevalca ni mogoče prisiliti, da proti svoji volji predstavi mnenje, ter poudarila, da se je strokovna skupina strinjala z opustitvijo.
Mr Nilsson asked the Assembly to ratify the appointment of Mr Espuny Moyano as rapporteur‑general, in accordance with Rules 20 and 57(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
G. NILSSON je pozval skupščino, da v skladu s členoma 20 in 57(1) poslovnika potrdi imenovanje g. ESPUNYJA MOYANA za glavnega poročevalca.
Mr Nilsson confirmed that the amendment to point 4.3.3 was withdrawn.
Metzler, in dejal, da je bil amandma k točki 4.3.3 umaknjen.
Mr Nilsson emphasised that budget decentralisation might help to make the Committee's bodies aware of the budgetary impact of their activities.
G, NILSSON je poudaril, da bi lahko bila koristna decentralizacija proračuna, s čimer bi se organi Odbora bolj zavedli proračunskih posledice njihove dejavnosti.
Mr Nilsson explained that the version submitted to Bureau members was not a definitive version of the programme, to which additions might still be made.
NILSSON, ki je povedal, da različica, predložena predsedstvu, ni končna različica programa, zato so še možne spremembe; g.
Mr Nilsson then asked Mr Espuny Moyano to present the draft opinion.
G. NILSSON je nato prosil g. ESPUNYJA MOYANA, naj predstavi osnutek mnenja.
Mr Noël (BE-II) (Rule 62 – Mr Lemercier)
Bernard NOËL (BE-II) (Jacques LEMERCIER, člen 62)
Mr Nyberg (SE-II)
g. Nyberg (SE-II)
Mr Nyberg questioned whether EESC opinions that endorsed the Commission's position should be included in an impact assessment.
G. NYBERG se je vprašal, ali je pri poskusu meritve učinka primerno omenjati mnenja, v katerih se EESO strinja s Komisijo.
Mr Nyberg then went on to criticise the fact that point 1.2 of the document had given external experts a role that impinged on the EESC's consultative work.
NYBERG je kritiziral vlogo, ki je v odstavku 1.2 dokumenta na škodo posvetovalnega dela EESO dodeljena posvetovanju z zunanjimi strokovnjaki.
Mr Olsson (SE-III)
g. Olsson (SE-III)
Mr Opran said it would be helpful for the adoption of future budgets to be accompanied by a clause to make it easier to transfer appropriations between items during the course of the year.
OPRAN, ki je spomnil, da bi bilo koristno, če bi sprejemanje prihodnjih proračunov spremljala klavzula, ki bi omogočala lažji prenos dela sredstev ned postavkami v proračunskem letu, in g.
Mr Ott had been a member of the following sections:
OTT je bil član naslednjih strokovnih skupin:
Mr Palmieri (IT-II)
Stefano PALMIERI (IT-II)
Mr Pariza Castaños also stressed the importance of a dialogue with southern Mediterranean countries, mainly through Mobility Partnerships.
Izpostavil je tudi pomen dialoga z državami južnega Sredozemlja, predvsem prek partnerstev za mobilnost.
Mr Peel
g. PEEL
Mr Peel (UK-I)
g. PEEL (UK-I)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
g. PEGADO LIZ (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Metzler, Mr Malosse, Mr Delapina, Mr Barath, Mr van Iersel and Mr Schröder spoke in the general discussion.
V splošni razpravi so sodelovali g. PEGADO LIZ, g. METZLER, g. MALOSSE, g. DELAPINA, g. BARATH, g. VAN IERSEL in g. SCHRÖDER.
Mr Pereira Martins (PT-III)
g. Pereira Martins (PT-III)
Mr Petringa (IT-III)
g. PETRINGA (IT-III)
Mr Pezzini (for the rapporteur)
Antonello PEZZINI (za poročevalca)
Mr Pezzini (IT-I)
Antonello PEZZINI (IT – I. sk.)
Mr Piette
g. PIETTE
Mr Pirvulescu highlighted the need to be more ambitious when it came to dialogue between the Committee and organisations represented in the Liaison Group and stressed shortcomings in the implementation of the development plan adopted by the Bureau in 2007.
G. Pirvulescu je opozoril, da bi od dialoga med Odborom in organizacijami, zastopanimi v skupini za stike, morali pričakovati več, ter poudaril pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju načrta razvoja, ki ga je predsedstvo sprejelo leta 2007. G.
Mr Planas then took the floor to sketch out the Action Plan, which was based on seven points: a) boosting institutional and political dialogue with the European Parliament, taking a targeted approach; b) exerting influence on annual legislative planning and defining priority areas for cooperation; c) boosting the impact of the EESC's work by means of a reinforced, structured and targeted approach in on-going working relations; d) working with the EP to establish a strategy in relation to the impact analyses; e) building up cooperation with the European Parliament in order to consolidate the dialogue with the public and civil society; f) bolstering cooperation in the area of communication; g) expanding the EESC's general political and administrative capacity in order to influence the European agenda.
Nato je spregovoril Luis PLANAS, ki je na kratko predstavil akcijski načrt, v katerem je predvidenih sedem ukrepov: a) okrepitev institucionalnega in političnega dialoga z Evropskim parlamentom s ciljno usmerjenim pristopom; b) vpliv na letno zakonodajno načrtovanje in opredelitev prednostnih področij za sodelovanje; c) povečanje učinka dela EESO z utrditvijo strukturiranega in usmerjenega pristopa v vsakodnevnih delovnih odnosih z Evropskim parlamentom; d) vzpostavitev strategije glede ocen učinka v sodelovanju z EP; e) okrepitev sodelovanja z Evropskim parlamentom za utrditev dialoga z državljani in civilno družbo; f) utrditev sodelovanja na področju komuniciranja; g) povečanje celotne politične in upravne zmogljivosti EESO za vplivanje na evropsko agendo.
Mr Páleník submitted a procedural motion, contesting the interpretation of Rule 46 of the RoP.
PALENIK je vložil ugovor na tolmačenje člena 46 poslovnika.
Mr Pérez Guzmán
Agueda PÉREZ GUZMÁN
Mr Rebolj focused on the proposal in Mr Delapina's opinion for a new growth model that has to be followed also by financial institutions.
REBOLJ se je osredotočil na predlog v mnenju g.
Mr Retureau stated he would vote against all of the amendments to keep the opinion balanced.
Povedal je, da bo glasoval proti amandmajem, da bi mnenje ostalo uravnoteženo.
Mr Retureau took part in the general discussion that followed.
V splošni razpravi, ki je sledila, je sodeloval g.
Mr Ribbe (DE-III)
g. RIBBE (DE-III)
Mr Roche Ramo (ES-III)
g. ROCHE RAMO (ES-III)
Mr Rodríguez García-Caro (ES-I)
g. Rodríguez García-Caro (ES-I)
Mr Rodríguez García-Caro considered that hosting a conference of this nature would provide an opportunity to demonstrate the importance of organised civil society's participation in this debate.
RODRÍGUEZA GARCÍE-CARO je organizacija takšne konference priložnost pokazati pomen sodelovanja organizirane civilne družbe v tej razpravi.
Mr Rodríguez García-Caro lamented the fact that the EESC was so wholly dependent on the other institutions when drawing up its work programme and that it could use the big European Parliament debating chamber in the PHS building in exceptional circumstances only.
RodrÍguez GarcÍa-Caro izrazil obžalovanje, da je EESO pri pripravi delovnega programa v celoti odvisen od drugih institucij in da je uporaba velike plenarne dvorane Evropskega parlamenta (PHS) mogoča le izjemoma.
Mr Rodríguez García-Caro raised a number of questions, relating among other things to the value of certain publications and the inconsistencies in the estimated costs for certain studies presented to the Bureau.
José Isaías RODRÍGUEZ GARCÍA-CARO je izpostavil več vprašanj, predvsem kar zadeva uporabnost določenih publikacij ter neskladnost predvidenih stroškov za nekatere študije, ki jih je predlagalo predsedstvo.
Mr Rudzikas and Mr Morgan took part in the ensuing debate.
V razpravi, ki je sledila, sta sodelovala g. RUDZIKAS in g. MORGAN.
Mr Röpke (AT-II)
Oliver RÖPKE (AT-II)
Mr Salcedo Aznal (for the rapporteur)
SALCEDO AZNAL
Mr Sarró Iparraguirre (ES-III)
SARRÓ IPARRAGUIRRE (ES-III)
Mr Schmit mentioned some successes that a country like Luxembourg had achieved, for example in education policies.
SCHMIT je izpostavil nekaj spodbudnih izkušenj v Luksemburgu, npr. na področju šolske politike.
Mr SCIANCA, Director, DLT
SCIANCA, direktor direkcije za logistiko in prevajanje
Mr SCIANCA, Director, DLT
SCIANCA, direktor direkcije za logistiko in prevajanje (DLT)
Mr Sepi announced that, pending a revision of the "Cardiff rules", the group presidents had agreed to continue the practice of determining the size of study groups in accordance with the importance of the topic, subject to the approval of the Bureau.
SEPI, ki je napovedal, da so se v pričakovanju revizije "cardiffskih pravil" predsedniki skupin dogovorili o nadaljnji uporabi prakse, po kateri se velikost študijskih skupin spreminja glede na pomen zadeve, če se s tem strinja predsedstvo, g.
Mr Sepi considered that the EESC resolution on the "Contribution to the European Council of 21 and 22 June 2007 – Roadmap for the constitutional process" broadly mirrored the resolution put forward by the EP in this area.
SEPI je ocenil, da je resolucija EESO o prispevku za Evropski svet 21. in 22. junija 2007 – časovni načrt za ustavni proces v skladu z resolucijo, ki jo je o tej temi sprejel Parlament.
Mr Sepi explained that the request had been submitted on account of the delay in the Council referral.
SEPI je pojasnil, da je ta zahtevek povezan z zamudo zaprosila Sveta.
Mr Sequeira (II-PT)
SEQUEIRA (II-PT)
Mr Sequeira (PT-II)
SEQUEIRA (PT-II)
Mr Sequeira (PT-II)
Victor Sequeira (PT-II)
Mr Sequeira pointed out a contradiction between the wording proposed for Rules 43(J) and 43(J)(a)), with regard to participation in the activities of the observatories.
SEQUEIRA pa je opozoril na protislovje med predlaganim besedilom členov 43 J in 43 J a), ki se nanaša na udeležbo pri dejavnostih opazovalnih skupin.
Mr Sibian (RO-III)
g. SIBIAN (RO-III)
Mr Siecker (NL-II)
Martin SIECKER (NL-II)
Mr Siecker, Mr Coulon, Mr Trantina, Ms Slavová, Ms Studničná, Mr van Iersel and Mr Burns commented on the process (some with reservations as to the proposal to limit the number of own-initiative opinions) and explained the reasons for the priorities chosen by the sections.
Nato so Martin SIECKER, Pierre Jean COULON, Pavel TRANTINA, Dilyana SLAVOVA, Lucie STUDNIČNÁ, Joost van IERSEL in Brendan BURNS podali pripombe (nekateri govorniki so izrazili zadržke glede predloga, da se omeji število mnenj na lastno pobudo) in utemeljili izbor prednostnih nalog strokovnih skupin.
Mr Simon Cox (for Group II)
g. Simon COX (za II. skupino)
Mr Simons (NL - I)
Jan SIMONS (NL-I)
Mr Simons (NL – I)
g. SIMONS (NL – I)
Mr Simons (NL-I)
Jan SIMONS (NL-I)
Mr Simons (NL-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Metzler)
Jan SIMONS (NL-I) (Arno METZLER, člen 62)
Mr Simons and Ms Le Nouail took part in the ensuing discussion.
V razpravi, ki je sledila, sta sodelovala g. SIMONS in ga. LE NOUAIL.
Mr Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (UK-III)
Mr Smet
Freddy SMET
Mr Soares (PT-II)
g. SOARES (PT-II)
Mr Staikos (III-EL)
STAIKOS (III-EL)
Mr Stantič (SI-I)
g. STANTIČ (SI-I)
Mr Stantič indicated that he intended to present a document with proposals for amendments to the Rules of Procedure, concerning the current Rule 10 in particular.
G. Stantič je dejal, da želi predstaviti predloge sprememb poslovnika, zlasti v zvezi s sedanjim členom 10.
Mr Stantič stressed that the legality of the proposal had been established and that the choice before the panel depended on the political will to formalise something that already seemed to be happening in practice.
STANTIČ je poudaril, da je bila ugotovljena zakonitost predloga in da je odločitev komisije odvisna samo od politične volje za formalizacijo nečesa, kar je v praksi že uveljavljeno.
Mr Stefan Petranov (for the rapporteur)
Stefan PETRANOV (za poročevalko)
Mr Stoev (BG-I)
Georgi STOEV (BG-I)
Mr Strautmanis (LV-I)
Gundars STRAUTMANIS (LV-I)
Mr Stöhr (DE-III)
g. STÖHR (DE-III)
Mr Svensson mentioned that an announcement had been made that at each meeting there would be an update on the negotiations relating to the expiry of the cooperation agreement with the CoR.
Erik SVENSSON je opozoril, da je bilo napovedano, da bodo na vsaki seji predstavljene informacije o stanju pogajanj, ki so v teku zaradi prenehanja veljavnosti sporazuma o sodelovanju z OR.
Mr Sánchez Ansó (ES-III)
g. Sánchez Ansó (ES-III)
Mr Teisseire requested that the Commission also consider, in the context of its examination of the impact of the Treaty reform, updating the statute of the members of the committee, in line with the discussions underway within other EU institutions.
TEISSEIRE, ki je prosil, da bi se komisija v okviru razmisleka o učinku revizije pogodbe lotila tudi posodobitve statuta članov Odbora v skladu z razpravami, ki trenutno potekajo v drugih institucijah EU.
Mr Thau (DE-Cat.1)
Jens THAU (DE – 1. kat.)
Mr Thysebaert
M. THYSEBAERT
Mr Thyssen
Marco THYSSEN
Mr Timmermans suggested improving bilateral cooperation agreements between the EC and the EESC, regardless of the outcome of negotiations on the interinstitutional agreement.
G. TIMMERMANS je predlagal izboljšanje dvostranskih sporazumov o sodelovanju med Komisijo in EESO, ne glede na izid pogajanj o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu.
Mr Toni Vidan (Gr.
Toni VIDAN (III. sk.
Mr Trantina
Pavel TRANTINA
Mr Trias Pinto spoke in the general discussion.
Sledila je splošna razprava, med katero je spregovoril tudi g.
Mr Trias Pintó (ES-III)
Carlos TRIAS PINTÓ (ES-III)
Mr Trias Pintó mentioned the need for adequate instruments to build a competitive economy.
TRIAS PINTÓ je dejal, da so potrebni ustrezni instrumenti za oblikovanje konkurenčnega gospodarstva.
Mr Tóth confirmed this and drew members' attention to the fact that the Hungarian ESC had been created following a Group III meeting in Budapest.
TóTH, ki je člane predsedstva obvestil, da je madžarski ekonomsko-socialni svet bil ustanovljen po seji III. skupine v Budimpešti.
Mr Tóth thought that the group's work would contribute to strengthening organised civil society and that participatory democracy would be strengthened through greater consistency between EESC actions and the group's recommendations.
TOTH je menil, da je delo skupine prispevalo h krepitvi organizirane civilne družbe in da je podlaga za krepitev participativne demokracije boljša povezanost med ukrepi EESO in priporočili skupine.
Mr Valcárcel, followed by the president, Mr Malosse, concluded by commenting on and endorsing the remarks made by the previous speakers.
Na koncu sta Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO in predsednik Henri MALOSSE komentirala in podprla predloge predhodnih govornikov.
Mr van Iersel (I-NL)
VAN IERSEL (I-NL)
Mr van Iersel also expressed his pleasure in seeing that Member States are getting on the right track as far as structural reforms are concerned.
Joost VAN IERSEL je poleg tega izrazil tudi zadovoljstvo ob tem, da so države članice na pravi poti, kar zadeva strukturne reforme.