natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2.2 The EESC believes that for reasons of simplification following the 2004 reform and the discussions ongoing in the "direct aid" management committee, it would be more useful and practical for the Commission to submit a proposal for a consolidated version of Regulation (EEC) No. 2075/92 rather than recommending amendments to, and removal of, certain articles.
2.2 EESO meni, da bi bilo zaradi poenostavitve po reformi iz leta 2004 in tekočih razprav v Odboru za upravljanje neposrednih plačil bolj koristno in praktično, da Komisija predloži predlog za prečiščeno verzijo Uredbe (EGS) št. 2075/92, kot pa da predlaga spremembo in črtanje nekaterih členov.
2.2 The EESC believes that in our changing society, it is important to analyse the situation of people in need of social care and a high level of support across the EU, so as to develop appropriate responses and exchange good practices.
2.2 EESO meni, da je v današnji spreminjajoči se družbi treba po vsej EU analizirati položaj tistih, ki potrebujejo socialno oskrbo in visoko raven podpore, da bi se lahko ustrezno odzvali in omogočili izmenjavo dobrih praks.
2.2 The EESC believes that the European Commission should apply the social approach to disability when tackling this issue in different documents of the Commission, which would enable to promote the use of more neutral and inclusive language in the wider area of disability.
2.2 EESO meni, da bi Evropska komisija pri obravnavi vprašanja invalidnosti v različnih dokumentih morala uporabiti družbeni pristop, kar bi spodbudilo uporabo bolj nevtralnega jezika, ki je vljučen na širšem področju invalidnosti.
2.2 The EESC believes that the focus of competitiveness within Europe should be broadened, and hence go beyond the measure of the GDP of the Member States.
2.2 EESO meni, da je treba pojem konkurenčnosti v Evropi razširiti tako, da bo vključeval več kot le BDP držav članic.
2.2 The EESC believes that the focus of competitiveness within Europe should be broadened, and hence the GDP of the Member States.
2.2 EESO meni, da je treba pojem konkurenčnosti v Evropi razširiti tako, da bo vključeval več kot le BDP držav članic.
2.2 The EESC believes that the proposal can ensure that consumers have confidence in the quality of products on the market and that due prominence is given to strengthening market surveillance.
2.2 EESO meni, da bi lahko predlog omogočil, da se zagotovi zaupanje potrošnikov v kakovost proizvodov na trgu in izpostavi pomen okrepljenega nadzora trga.
2.2 The EESC believes that the support programmes for Greece (Task Force for Greece) and Cyprus (Support Group for Cyprus) have proved to be useful for the countries targeted, and that opening up the possibility of requesting such a support mechanism for all Member States will enhance overall capacity for institutional, structural and administrative reforms.
2.2 EESO ugotavlja koristnost podpornih programov za Grčijo (delovne skupine za Grčijo) in Ciper (podporne skupine za Ciper) in meni, da bi se z uvedbo možnosti takega mehanizma podpore za vse države članice povečala splošna zmogljivost za institucionalne, strukturne in upravne reforme.
2.2 The EESC calls for a comprehensive impact assessment and an independent evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of PPPs to be undertaken and for proposals by the social partners, including organisations representing SMEs, to be taken into account and capitalised on before further-reaching policy decisions are taken.
2.2 EESO zahteva, da se pred sprejemanjem daljnosežnih političnih odločitev opravi temeljita ocena učinkov in neodvisna ocena prednosti in pomanjkljivosti projektov JZP ter dejansko upoštevajo predlogi socialnih partnerjev, tudi organizacij, ki zastopajo MSP.
2.2 The EESC calls for the effective implementation of the UN CRPD through the revision and development of European legislation.
2.2 EESO poziva k reviziji in nadaljnjemu oblikovanju evropske zakonodaje, da bi učinkovito izvajali Konvencijo ZN.
2.2 The EESC can and must help civil society organisations in the southern Mediterranean in their current consolidation phase, providing support and solidarity.
2.2 EESO lahko pomaga in mora pomagati organizacijam civilne družbe v južnem Sredozemlju, ki se v sedanjem obdobju krepijo, ter jim izkazati podporo in solidarnost.
2.2 The EESC cannot accept that terrorists and criminals should be able to escape justice due to the EU's internal borders hindering police or judicial action.
2.2 EESO meni, da ne sme noben terorist ali zločinec ubežati pravici zaradi tega, ker notranje meje EU ovirajo ukrepanje policijskih in sodnih organov.
2.2 The EESC considers it extremely important to have a true and totally free civil society in Belarus as the prerequisite for lasting stability and the development of democracy in the country.
To je pogoj za dolgoročno stabilizacijo in razvoj demokracije v državi.
2.2 The EESC considers that the Commission proposal is a logical consequence of the need to adapt Community regulations to the integration of new Member States into the European Union and to changes in the European wine sector.
2.2 EESO meni, da je predlog Komisije logična posledica potrebe po prilagoditvi zakonodaje Skupnosti vključitvi novih držav članic v Evropsko unijo in spremembam v evropskem vinskem sektorju.
2.2 The EESC considers that the present method and scope of disclosure of non-financial information are very good and fit for purpose.
2.2 EESO meni, da sta sedanji način objave nefinančnih informacij in njihov obseg kakovostna in zadostna glede na zastavljeni cilj.
2.2 The EESC considers this objective to be absolutely vital.
2.2 EESO meni, da je ta cilj ključen.
2.2 The EESC discussed the future of TEN-T in detail at a section meeting in Rome in September 2003 with the Italian Economic and Labour Council's (CNEL) Commission V on large-scale infrastructure projects and networks.
2.2 Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor je podrobneje razpravljal o prihodnosti vseevropskega omrežja (TEN-T) na seji septembra 2003 v Rimu s Komisijo V italijanskega Gospodarskega in delavskega sveta (CNEL) za obsežne infrastrukturne projekte in omrežja.
2.2 The EESC drew up an opinion3 supporting the establishment of Frontex, recalling the need to respect the right of asylum (principle of "non-refoulement") and to uphold fundamental rights at the border.
2.2 EESO je pripravil mnenje3 o tej uredbi, v katerem je pozdravil ustanovitev agencije Frontex ter opozoril, da je treba na mejah Unije zagotoviti spoštovanje pravice do azila (načelo nevračanja) in varstvo temeljnih pravic.
2.2 The EESC emphasises the role of non-price factors such as product differentiation, technological content, product quality, the quality of product-related services (after-sales), etc. in creating macroeconomic imbalances.
2.2 EESO poudarja vlogo, ki jo imajo pri ustvarjanju makroekonomskih neravnovesij necenovni dejavniki, kot so diferenciranje izdelkov, tehnološka vsebina, kakovost izdelka, kakovost z izdelkom povezanih storitev (poprodajne storitve) ipd.
2.2 The EESC firmly believes that social policy should be a pillar of EU policy, both in its own right and as a means of promoting long-term growth and employment4.
2.2 EESO izraža prepričanje, da bi morala biti socialna politika že sama po sebi, pa tudi kot sredstvo za trajnostno spodbujanje rasti in zaposlovanja,4 eden od stebrov politike EU.
2.2 The EESC fully agrees on the need for:
2.2 Odbor v celoti soglaša, da je treba:
2.2 The EESC fully supports the idea that a change in mindsets or attitudes is crucial to achieving an increase in entrepreneurship rates and needs to start at an early age.
2.2 EESO v celoti podpira mnenje, da je spreminjanje miselnosti in vedenja bistvenega pomena za doseganje večje rasti podjetništva, ter meni, da je s tem treba začeti že v zgodnji mladosti.
2.2 The EESC further recognises the necessity to ensure thorough and continuous compliance with existing requirements in order to meet international obligations.
2.2 Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor nadalje priznava potrebo, da se zagotovi temeljito in stalno skladnost z obstoječimi zahtevami ter tako izpolnijo mednarodne obveznosti.
2.2 The EESC has a particular interest in the proposals on the Asylum and Migration Fund, and would call on the Member States, in the negotiations with the Council, to approve the sums proposed by the Commission, and not to reduce them, since the issues of asylum, migration, integration and the protection of people's fundamental rights should be provided with the necessary resources, particularly during the economic crisis.
2.2 EESO se posebno zanima za predloge glede Sklada za migracije in azil in predlaga, da v pogajanjih v okviru Sveta države članice odobrijo zneske, ki jih predlaga Komisija, in jih ne zmanjšajo, saj morajo biti za področja azila, migracij in vključevanja ter temeljnih človekovih pravic zlasti v obdobju gospodarske krize na voljo potrebna sredstva.
2.2 The EESC has already expressed, in a former opinion3, the specific structure and dynamics of this sector.
2.2 EESO je v predhodnem mnenju3 že pojasnil posebno strukturo in razgibanost te panoge.
2.2 The EESC has always stressed that improving competitiveness and achieving sustainable economic growth in the framework of the Lisbon Strategy are not ends in themselves, but, rather, are intended to lead to a reduction in the high rate of unemployment in the EU, aiming for full employment, placing social security schemes on a more stable foundation and providing protection against social exclusion4.
2.2 EESO nenehno poudarja, da okrepitev konkurenčnosti in trajnostna gospodarska rast v okviru lizbonske strategije nista cilja sama po sebi, temveč naj bi pripomogli tudi k zmanjšanju visoke brezposelnosti v EU, doseganju polne zaposlenosti, postavljanju sistemov socialne varnosti na trdnejšo osnovo in zagotavljanju zaščite pred socialno izključenostjo4.
2.2 The EESC has an essential role to play in encouraging the greater involvement and participation of organised civil society in the European project and, in the case at hand, in facilitating the implementation of policies and actions which promote territorial cohesion.
2.2 EESO ima pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju večje vključenosti in sodelovanja organizirane civilne družbe pri evropskem projektu ter v tem primeru pri lažjem izvajanju politik in ukrepov, ki spodbujajo teritorialno kohezijo.
2.2 The EESC has endorsed the integrated, multi-annual approach to a future EU strategy on several occasions and consistently pointed out that full involvement of national parliaments, the social partners and civil society at European and national level is a key condition for successful policy coordination and must be ensured at every stage1.
2.2 EESO je večkrat potrdil integriran in večleten pristop k strategiji o prihodnosti EU in nenehno opozarjal, da je obsežna vključitev nacionalnih parlamentov, socialnih partnerjev in civilne družbe na evropski in nacionalni ravni nosilni steber uspešnega usklajevanja politike in je potrebna v vseh fazah1.
2.2 The EESC has for more than a decade in numerous opinions supported the goal of increasing the use of RES and given its comments and recommendations on proposed policies based on practical experience within civil society (TEN/211).
2.2 EESO se v številnih mnenjih že več kot deset let zavzema za povečanje uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov ter komentira predlagane politike in z zvezi z njimi daje priporočila na podlagi praktičnih izkušenj civilne družbe (TEN/211).
2.2 The EESC has for more than a decade in numerous opinions supported the goal of increasing the use of RES and given its comments and recommendations on proposed policies based on practical experience within civil society (TEN/211).
2.2 EESO se že več kot deset let v številnih mnenjih zavzema za povečanje uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov ter komentira predlagane politike in z zvezi z njimi daje priporočila na podlagi praktičnih izkušenj civilne družbe (TEN/211).
2.2 The EESC has for more than a decade in numerous opinions supported the goal of increasing the use of RES and given its comments and recommendations on proposed policies based on practical experience within civil society1.
2.2 EESO se v številnih mnenjih že več kot deset let zavzema za povečanje uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov ter komentira predlagane politike in z zvezi z njimi daje priporočila na podlagi praktičnih izkušenj civilne družbe1.
2.2 The EESC has issued a large number of opinions contributing to the recognition of education as a fundamental human right2, in which the Committee makes it clear that the main purpose of education remains to teach people to be free, critical and independent individuals who are able to contribute to the development of the society in which they live and understand that they share values and culture.
2.2 EESO je pripomogel k priznanju izobraževanja kot temeljne človekove pravice s številnimi mnenji na to temo2, v katerih je izpostavil, da tudi v prihodnje ostaja glavni namen izobraževanja ljudi naučiti svobodnega, kritičnega in samostojnega razmišljanja ter jih usposobiti, da lahko prispevajo k razvoju družbe, v kateri živijo, in da se zavedajo dejstva, da imajo skupne vrednote in skupno kulturo.
2.2 The EESC has produced opinions on all of these topics2.
2.2 EESO je izdal mnenja o vseh teh temah2.
2.2 The EESC has produced opinions on all of these topics3.
2.2 EESO je izdal mnenja o vseh teh temah3.
2.2 The EESC has produced opinions on all of these topics4.
2.2 EESO je izdal mnenja o vseh teh temah4.
2.2 The EESC has provided a detailed analysis of the proposal for the Horizon 2020 Regulations in its opinion from March 20121.
2.2 EESO je v mnenju iz marca 20121 podrobno analiziral predlog uredb o programu Obzorje 2020.
2.2 The EESC has recently stressed that "Public authorities switching to digital services will have to modernise, by improving the quality, flexibility and quantity of the services they deliver, aiming for efficient use of public resources, cost-cutting, user satisfaction, coordination between public administrations and less bureaucracy"2.
2.2 Odbor je še pred kratkim poudaril, da bo "v javnih upravah, ki bodo prešle na digitalne storitve, potrebna posodobitev, v okviru katere bodo le-te morale izboljšati kakovost in prožnost, povečati število storitev, ki jih opravljajo, in si prizadevati za učinkovito uporabo javnih sredstev, zmanjšanje stroškov, zadovoljstvo uporabnikov, usklajevanje med javnimi upravami in manj birokracije2."
2.2 The EESC has recently stressed that "Public authorities switching to digital services will have to modernise, by improving the quality, flexibility and quantity of the services they deliver, aiming for efficient use of public resources, cost-cutting, user satisfaction, coordination between public administrations and less bureaucracy"3.
2.2 Odbor je še pred kratkim poudaril, da bo "v javnih upravah, ki bodo prešle na digitalne storitve, potrebna posodobitev, v okviru katere bodo le-te morale izboljšati kakovost in prožnost, povečati število storitev, ki jih opravljajo, in si prizadevati za učinkovito uporabo javnih sredstev, zmanjšanje stroškov, zadovoljstvo uporabnikov, usklajevanje med javnimi upravami in manj birokracije3."
2.2 The EESC has therefore welcomed the Commission's social investment package2, which calls on the Member States to focus more strongly on social investment, and above all on the declared paradigm change of no longer regarding social investment purely as a cost but rather as an investment in the future3.
2.2 EESO je zato pozdravil sveženj ukrepov za socialne naložbe2, v katerem Komisija poziva države članice, naj posvetijo večjo pozornost socialnim naložbam, zlasti napovedani spremembi v razumevanju socialnih naložb, da ne bodo veljale več samo za stroške, temveč kot naložbe v prihodnost3.
2.2 The EESC has welcomed the fact that, in the new Europe 2020 strategy, the EU has agreed to create smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
2.2 EESO je izrazil zadovoljstvo, da se je EU v svoji novi strategiji Evropa 2020 zedinila glede ciljev pametne, trajnostne in vključujoče rasti.
2.2 The EESC has, in its own-initiative opinion The role of the EU in the Northern Ireland peace process1, underlined the importance of the IFI and supports rapidly rectifying the legal basis upon which the EU's financial contributions to the IFI are governed for the period 2007-2010 in the light of ECJ court case C-166/07.
2.2 EESO je v mnenju na lastno pobudo o vlogi EU v severnoirskem mirovnem procesu1 poudaril pomen Mednarodnega sklada za Irsko in se zavzema za to, da se glede na sodbo Evropskega sodišča, zadeva C-166/07, hitro spremeni pravna podlaga za finančne prispevke EU v sklad za obdobje 2007–2010.
2.2 The EESC intends to continue along the path set out in two earlier opinions, carrying forward the process of monitoring the progress made – at European level – in preparing complementary indicators to Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
2.2 EESO želi nadaljevati delo, ki ga je zastavil s predhodnima mnenjema, in vztrajati pri procesu spremljanja napredka, doseženega na evropski ravni pri razvoju kazalnikov, ki dopolnjujejo bruto domači proizvod (BDP).
2.2 The EESC is also heavily involved in discussions on digital transformation.
2.2 Tudi EESO je tesno vključen v razprave o digitalni preobrazbi.
2.2 The EESC is concerned to note that, in the current political, economic and social context, the debate on immigration issues has become very sensitive.
2.2 Odbor z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da so v današnjih političnih, gospodarskih in socialnih razmerah razprave o vprašanjih, povezanih s priseljevanjem, zelo občutljiva tema.
2.2 The EESC is pleased that the Luxemburg EU presidency request this exploratory opinion which aims to explore the concept of a financial ecosystem from the perspective of social enterprises, the main characteristics and necessary conditions needed to fully build an adequate and effective European framework for the financing and investment into social economy.
2.2 EESO izraža zadovoljstvo, da je luksemburško predsedstvo EU zaprosilo za to raziskovalno mnenje, katerega namen je preučiti koncept finančnega ekosistema z vidika socialnih podjetij ter glavne značilnosti in pogoje, potrebne za oblikovanje ustreznega in učinkovitega evropskega okvira za financiranje in naložbe v socialno ekonomijo.
2.2 The EESC is pleased to meet this request, as it considers this proposal to be an important further step in improving maritime safety.
2.2 Odbor se je z veseljem odzval na to zaprosilo, saj je predlog spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1406/2002 po njegovem mnenju pomemben korak k izboljšanju pomorske varnosti.
2.2 The EESC is well aware that emissions of volatile organic compounds present in petrol are detrimental to local and regional air quality (benzene and ozone) for which Community air quality standards and objectives exist.
2.2 EESO se dobro zaveda, da imajo zaradi emisij hlapnih organskih spojin, ki jih vsebuje motorni bencin, regije in lokalna območja težave glede kakovosti zraka (benzen in ozon), ker morajo v zvezi z njimi izpolnjevati standarde in cilje Skupnosti.
2.2 The EESC is well aware that emissions of volatile organic compounds present in petrol are detrimental to local and regional air quality (benzene and ozone) for which Community air quality standards and objectives exist.
2.2 EESO se dobro zaveda, da imajo zaradi emisij hlapnih organskih spojin, ki jih vsebuje motorni bencin, regije in občine težave glede kakovosti zraka (benzen in ozon), ker morajo v zvezi z njimi izpolnjevati standarde in cilje Skupnosti.
2.2 The EESC might commend the Commission for the support it has given to the work in the ILO which has resulted in this new Convention, and with its good cooperation with the Governments and the employers' and workers' organisations of the Member States in the tripartite setting of the ILO.
2.2 EESO pozdravlja podporo Komisije delu ILO, na podlagi katerega je nastala nova konvencija, in njeno dobro sodelovanje z vladami ter organizacijami delodajalcev in delavcev v državah članicah v tristranski strukturi ILO.
2.2 The EESC notes and welcomes the addition of the European Parliament, as co-legislator with the Council, to the title of the regulation in question.
2.2 EESO se seznanja z dejstvom, da se Evropski parlament v naslovu tega predpisa navede kot sozakonodajalca poleg Sveta, in to spremembo podpira.
2.2 The EESC notes that, in point 2.2 of this document, the Council called for work to be stepped up on electricity and gas infrastructure projects, including interconnections - particularly to peripheral regions - in order to ensure energy security and a well-functioning internal energy market.
2.2 EESO ugotavlja, da je v točki 2.2 tega dokumenta Svet pozval k pospešenemu izvajanju infrastrukturnih projektov za električno energijo in plin, vključno s povezavami – zlasti z obrobnimi regijami –, da se zagotovita energetska varnost in dobro delujoč notranji energetski trg.
2.2 The EESC notes the recent publication of two important documents: "Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union"7 and "Blueprint for a deep and genuine economic and monetary union"8, on which the Committee is currently preparing an opinion9.
2.2 EESO je seznanjen, da sta bila nedavno objavljena pomembna dokumenta: Načrt za pravo ekonomsko in monetarno unijo7 in Na poti k pravi ekonomski in monetarni uniji8, o čemer trenutno pripravlja mnenje9.
2.2 The EESC notices that there is a need to improve the infrastructure of ports and canals so as to accommodate larger ships, eliminate port congestion and maximise quick port turn-around.
2.2 EESO ugotavlja, da je treba izboljšati infrastrukturo pristanišč in kanalov za sprejem večjih ladij, odpravo zastojev v pristaniščih in čim hitrejše pretovarjanje.
2.2 The EESC points out that macro-regional cooperation is part of the process of building democracy in the EU, and of strengthening bottom-up initiatives.
2.2 EESO poudarja, da je makroregionalno sodelovanje del procesa izgradnje demokracije v EU in spodbujanja pobud "od spodaj navzgor".
2.2 The EESC points out that macro-regional cooperation is part of the process of strengthening democracy in the EU, and of strengthening bottom-up initiatives.
2.2 EESO poudarja, da je makroregionalno sodelovanje del procesa krepitve demokracije v EU in spodbujanja pobud "od spodaj navzgor".
2.2 The EESC points out that the draft proposal for an Equal Treatment Directive was submitted by the EC before the conclusion of the UN CPRD.
2.2 EESO poudarja, da je Evropska komisija osnutek predloga za direktivo o enakem obravnavanju predložila pred sklenitvijo Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov.
2.2 The EESC points out that the draft proposal for an Equal Treatment Directive was submitted by the European Commission before the conclusion of the UN CPRD.
2.2 EESO poudarja, da je Evropska komisija osnutek predloga za direktivo o enakem obravnavanju predložila pred sklenitvijo Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija ZN).
2.2 The EESC proposes that more funding be deployed using the LEADER approach, and not just funding under the future rural development programme.
2.2 Odbor predlaga, da naj se prek pristopa LEADER nameni več finančnih sredstev, ne samo sredstev prihodnjega programa razvoja podeželja.
2.2 The EESC recalls that the draft proposal for an Equal Treatment Directive was submitted by the EC before the conclusion of the UN CPRD.
2.2 EESO opozarja, da je Evropska komisija osnutek predloga za direktivo o enakem obravnavanju predložila pred sklenitvijo Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov.
2.2 The EESC recognises that the implications of the EU climate and energy policy for the development of the agricultural and forestry sectors are complex.
2.2 EESO priznava, da so vplivi podnebne in energetske politike EU na razvoj kmetijstva in gozdarstva kompleksni.
2.2 The EESC recognises that the Lisbon Treaty now provides a clear legal base for the EU to establish minimum rights and protections for victims of crime.
2.2 EESO priznava, da Lizbonska pogodba zagotavlja jasno pravno podlago za to, da EU določi najosnovnejše pravice in zaščito žrtev kaznivih dejanj.