natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3.2.4 The Commission’s proposed regulation states that the Council could reduce the amount of the deposit unanimously or based on a specific proposal by the Commission on grounds of exceptional circumstances or a reasoned request by the Member State.
3.2.4 Komisija v predlogu uredbe navaja, da lahko Svet zmanjša znesek depozita, in sicer soglasno ali po posebnem predlogu Komisije zaradi izrednih okoliščin ali na podlagi utemeljene prošnje države članice.
3.2.4 The Committee also agrees that a European border guard service should be developed in the future, comprising a European body of border guards set up by a future centralised European administration.
3.2.4 Odbor se prav tako strinja, da je treba v prihodnosti vzpostaviti evropsko službo mejne straže, sestavljeno iz evropske rezervne skupine pripadnikov mejne straže, ki bi v prihodnosti postala centralizirana evropska uprava.
3.2.4 The Committee calls on the Commission to amend the wording of Article 4(2), specifically by deleting the phrase "unless the parties expressly agree otherwise", given that this is significant information that should not be left to the discretion of the parties concerned.
3.2.4 EESO poziva Komisijo, naj spremeni besedilo člena 4(2) in črta zlasti stavek "razen če se stranke o tem izrecno dogovorijo drugače", ker je to bistvena informacija, ki ne sme biti prepuščena presoji pogodbenih strani.
3.2.4 The Committee calls on the Commission to amend the wording of Article 4(2), specifically by deleting the phrase "unless the parties expressly agree otherwise", given that this is significant information that should not be left to the discretion of the parties concerned.
3.2.4 EESO poziva Komisijo, naj spremeni besedilo člena 4(2) in črta zlasti stavek "razen če se stranke o tem izrecno dogovorijo drugače", ker je to bistvena informacija, ki ne sme biti prepuščena presoji pogodbenih strank.
3.2.4 The Committee endorses the EU strategy on biofuels, COM(2006) 34 final, primarily where it states that it is essential that appropriate minimum environmental standards apply to feedstock production for biofuels, and highlights concerns raised over the use of set-aside land because of the potential impact on biodiversity and soil.
3.2.4 Odbor podpira strategijo EU na področju biogoriv (COM(2006) 34 final), zlasti navedbo, da je bistveno, da za proizvodnjo surovin za biogoriva veljajo ustrezni minimalni okoljski standardi, ter poudarja pomisleke glede uporabe zemljišč v prahi zaradi možnega vpliva na biotsko raznovrstnost in tla.
3.2.4 The Committee endorses the EU strategy on biofuels21, primarily where it states that it is essential that appropriate minimum environmental standards apply to feedstock production for biofuels, and highlights concerns raised over the use of set-aside land because of the potential impact on biodiversity and soil.
3.2.4 Odbor podpira strategijo EU na področju biogoriv21, zlasti navedbo, da je bistveno, da za proizvodnjo surovin za biogoriva veljajo ustrezni minimalni okoljski standardi, ter poudarja pomisleke glede uporabe zemljišč v prahi zaradi možnega vpliva na biotsko raznovrstnost in tla.
3.2.4 The Committee notes that the efforts invested in achieving maximum harmonisation in legislative proposals quite often lead to a plethora of derogations and exclusions, the result of which is to create and legitimise further barriers to the internal market.
3.2.4 Odbor ugotavlja, da prizadevanja za čim večjo harmonizacijo v zakonodajnih predlogih pogosto privedejo do številnih odstopanj in izjem, ki povzročajo in upravičujejo dodatne ovire na notranjem trgu.
3.2.4 The Committee notes that the new Member States of central and eastern Europe have a high proportion of agricultural land.
3.2.4 Odbor ugotavlja, da je v novih državah pristopnicah srednje in vzhodne Evrope na razpolago veliko kmetijskih površin.
3.2.4 The Committee takes the view that the plans for growth and job creation must be aligned with national reforms that boost high-quality labour participation, increase productivity and take the best from training and education systems.
3.2.4 Odbor meni, da morajo biti načrti za rast in ustvarjanje delovnih mest usklajeni z nacionalnimi reformami, ki spodbujajo visokokakovostno vključenost v delo, povečujejo produktivnost ter kar najbolje izkoriščajo sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja.
3.2.4 The Committee therefore urges the Commission to give particular attention in its analytical work of the next three years to improving the methods of forecasting near term (1-5 years) impacts that may require the most urgent adaptive measures and action within that period.
3.2.4 Odbor zato spodbuja Komisijo, da pri analitičnem delu v prihodnjih treh letih posveti posebno pozornost izboljšanju metod napovedovanja vplivov v bližnji prihodnosti (1-5 let), ki utegnejo zahtevati najnujnejše prilagoditvene ukrepe v tem obdobju.
3.2.4 The Committee therefore urges the Commission to give particular attention in its analytical work of the next three years to improving the methods of forecasting near term (1-5 years) impacts that may require the most urgent adaptive measures and action within that period.
3.2.4 Odbor zato spodbuja Komisijo, da pri analitičnem delu v prihodnjih treh letih posveti posebno pozornost izboljšanju metod napovedovanja vplivov v bližnji prihodnosti (1–5 let), ki utegnejo zahtevati najnujnejše prilagoditvene ukrepe v tem obdobju.
3.2.4 The Committee welcomes in particular the fact that innovations are understood and defined in terms of their broader ramifications.
3.2.4 Odbor zlasti pozdravlja, da se inovacije razumejo v širokem, povezanem smislu in so tako tudi opredeljene.
3.2.4 the economic and social reforms of the Lisbon Strategy, insofar as they take root and have a knock-on effect, with an active contribution by the social partners, should also give crucial support to cohesion policy.
3.2.4 gospodarske in družbene reforme lizbonske strategije bodo tudi pomembno podpirale kohezijsko politiko Evropske unije, v kolikor se bodo uspele razviti in doseči učinek z aktivnim sodelovanjem socialnih partnerjev.
3.2.4 The EESC agrees with the Commission's Communication recommendation9 that to improve the chances of the disadvantaged to succeed in the labour market, better cooperation between public authorities, public and private employment services, social services, adult education services, social partners and civil society is needed.
3.2.4 EESO se strinja s priporočilom Komisije9, da je potrebno boljše sodelovanje med javnimi oblastmi, javnimi in zasebnimi zavodi za zaposlovanje, socialnimi službami, ustanovami za izobraževanje odraslih, socialnimi partnerji in civilno družbo, če želimo izboljšati možnosti prikrajšanih skupin za uspeh na trgu dela.
3.2.4 The EESC agrees with the Commission’s Communication recommendation11 that to improve the chances of the disadvantaged to succeed in the labour market, better cooperation between public authorities, public and private employment services, social services, adult education services, social partners and civil society is needed.
3.2.4 EESO se strinja s priporočilom Komisije11, da je potrebno boljše sodelovanje med javnimi oblastmi, javnimi in zasebnimi zavodi za zaposlovanje, socialnimi službami, ustanovami za izobraževanje odraslih, socialnimi partnerji in civilno družbo, če želimo izboljšati možnosti prikrajšanih skupin za uspeh na trgu dela.
3.2.4 The EESC also recommends that the Commission endeavour to simplify all the provisions relating to distance selling, which are currently scattered across a number of different instruments, and make them more accessible and easier to understand.
3.2.4 EESO tudi predlaga, da si Komisija prizadeva poenostaviti vse določbe o prodaji na daljavo, ki so trenutno razdrobljene po različnih pravnih instrumentih, ter jih naredi dostopnejše in lažje razumljive.
3.2.4 The EESC calls for the amendment of the third paragraph of Article 5 of Directive 2006/115/EC on the application and collection of equitable remuneration by collecting societies and calls for the term "equitable remuneration", as used in the paragraphs of the article concerned, to be replaced with the term "proportionate remuneration".
3.2.4 Odbor poziva, da se člen 5(3) Direktive 2006/115/ES v zvezi s pravičnim nadomestilom in njegovim prejemanjem v kolektivnih organizacijah spremeni ter se izraz "pravično nadomestilo", kot je uporabljen v različnih točkah navedenega člena, nadomesti z izrazom "sorazmerno nadomestilo".
3.2.4 The EESC calls on the Commission secretary general to review the impact assessment guidelines and to modify them to include a more comprehensive list of issues and questions in order to better assess compliance with the Convention.
3.2.4 Poleg tega poziva generalnega sekretarja Komisije, naj pregleda smernice za oceno učinka ter jih prilagodi tako, da bodo vključevale obsežnejši seznam težav in vprašanj, da bi lahko bolje ocenili skladnost s Konvencijo.
3.2.4 The EESC calls on the Commission secretary general to review the impact assessment guidelines and to modify them to include a more comprehensive list of issues and questions in order to better assess compliance with the Convention.
3.2.4 Prav tako poziva generalnega sekretarja Komisije, naj pregleda smernice za oceno učinka ter jih prilagodi tako, da bodo vključevale obsežnejši seznam težav in vprašanj, da bi lahko bolje ocenili skladnost s Konvencijo.
3.2.4 The EESC endorses the Commission's understanding, expressed in COM(2010) 579 final, that each BRF should receive contributions from institutions licensed in the same Member State, and the contribution should cover their branches in other Member States.
3.2.4 EESO podpira mnenje Komisije, izraženo v dokumentu COM(2010) 579 konč., v skladu s katerim naj bi se v posamezne bančne reševalne sklade stekali prispevki institucij, ki imajo dovoljenje za opravljanje dejavnosti v isti državi članici, prispevek pa bi pokrival tudi njihove poslovalnice v drugih državah članicah.
3.2.4 The EESC endorses the review of exclusions affecting seafarers and fishermen from EU labour legislation in close cooperation with the social partners and requires clarifications regarding the certificate of Maritime Excellence.
3.2.4 EESO podpira revizijo odstopanj, ki zadevajo pomorščake in ribiče, od delovne zakonodaje EU v tesnem sodelovanju s socialnimi partnerji, ter zahteva pojasnila v zvezi s potrdilom o pomorski odličnosti.
3.2.4 The EESC endorses the review of exclusions affecting seafarers and fishermen from EU labour legislation in close cooperation with the social partners and requires clarifications regarding the certificate of Maritime Excellence.
3.2.4 EESO podpira zamisel, da bi v tesnem sodelovanju s socialnimi partnerji pregledali odstopanja, ki se v delovni zakonodaji EU nanašajo na pomorščake/ribiče, ter zahteva pojasnila v zvezi s potrdilom o pomorski odličnosti.
3.2.4 The EESC has always seen competition policy as a key factor in the internal market, and must reiterate this at a time when the turbulence that has affected the European economy since 2008 is putting the EU's determination to pursue this policy to the test, as the public authorities may be more inclined to accept that recovery must take priority over respect for the Treaties.
3.2.4 EESO je politiko konkurence vedno obravnaval kot ključni dejavnik notranjega trga in mora to ponovno poudariti v času, ko je odločenost EU za prizadevanja v tej smeri na preizkušnji zaradi težav, ki vse od leta 2008 pretresajo evropsko gospodarstvo, saj se javni organi morda bolj nagibajo k mnenju, da ima oživitev gospodarstva prednost pred spoštovanjem Pogodb.
3.2.4 The EESC highlights the role of the EFSA in assessing the potential risks associated with using the technique of cloning.
3.2.4 EESO poudarja vlogo agencije EFSA pri ocenjevanju možnih tveganj, povezanih z uporabo tehnike kloniranja.
3.2.4 The EESC is also concerned that the proposed measures alone will not be enough to achieve the objectives set out in the EU's employment strategy.
3.2.4 EESO je poleg tega zaskrbljen, da ciljev, določenih v strategiji EU za zaposlovanje, ne bo mogoče uresničiti zgolj s predlaganimi ukrepi.
3.2.4 The EESC notes that the efforts invested in achieving maximum harmonisation in legislative proposals quite often lead to a plethora of derogations and exclusions, the result of which is to create and legitimise further barriers to the internal market.
3.2.4 EESO ugotavlja, da prizadevanja za čim večjo harmonizacijo v zakonodajnih predlogih pogosto privedejo do številnih odstopanj in izjem, ki povzročajo in upravičujejo dodatne ovire na notranjem trgu.
3.2.4 The EESC recalls that it has argued in favour of simplifying administrative, accounting and auditing procedures, "simplification should become cohesion policy's main objective"5 and therefore welcomes the efforts of the current proposal to include this principle.
3.2.4 EESO želi spomniti, da se je že zavzel za poenostavitev upravnih, računovodskih in revizijskih postopkov – "poenostavitev bi morala postati glavni cilj kohezijske politike"5 – in zato pozdravlja prizadevanja za vključitev tega načela v sedanjem predlogu.
3.2.4 The EESC recommends limiting the system of exemptions, depending on the nature of each tax by means of rigorous economic and social cost-benefit analyses, in line with the international principle of tax expenditures, which has been consolidated since 1968, and considering that during the last five crisis years tax-benefit systems were able to contain a considerable part of the increase in market inequality in most EU Member States, according to Commission studies22.
3.2.4 EESO priporoča, da se omeji sistem oprostitev, odvisno od narave davka, na podlagi natančne analize ekonomskih in socialnih stroškov in koristi v skladu z mednarodno prakso "davčnih izdatkov", ki je konsolidirana že od leta 1968. Upoštevati je treba tudi, da so po navedbah študij22 Komisije v zadnjih petih kriznih letih sistemi davčnih olajšav v veliki meri zaustavili povečanje tržnih neenakosti v večini držav članic EU.
3.2.4 The EESC recommends limiting the system of exemptions, depending on the nature of each tax by means of rigorous economic and social cost-benefit analyses, in line with the international principle of tax expenditures, which has been consolidated since 1968, and considering that during the last five crisis years tax-benefit systems were able to contain a considerable part of the increase in market inequality in most EU Member States, according to Commission studies23.
3.2.4 EESO priporoča, da se omeji sistem oprostitev, odvisno od narave davka, na podlagi natančne analize ekonomskih in socialnih stroškov in koristi v skladu z mednarodno prakso "davčnih izdatkov", ki je konsolidirana že od leta 1968. Upoštevati je treba tudi, da so po navedbah študij23 Komisije v zadnjih petih kriznih letih sistemi davčnih olajšav v veliki meri zaustavili povečanje tržnih neenakosti v večini držav članic EU.
3.2.4 The EESC recommends that the national poverty risk rates, poverty risk thresholds and the national material deprivation rates are included as indicators.
3.2.4 EESO priporoča, da se stopnje tveganja revščine v državi, pragi tveganja revščine in stopnje materialne prikrajšanosti v državi uporabijo kot kazalci.
3.2.4 The EESC therefore recommends managing fisheries in the Caribbean basin in agreement with the Cariforum States.
3.2.4 EESO torej priporoča, da se ribištvo na karibskem območju upravlja v dogovoru z državami Cariforuma.
3.2.4 The EESC therefore recommends that islamophobia be added to reinforce the need to address this particular form of racism where culture intersects with religion.
3.2.4 EESO zato priporoča, da se upošteva tudi islamofobijo in s tem poudari nujnost boja proti tej posebni obliki rasizma, pri kateri se mešata kultura in religija.
3.2.4 The EESC wants to stress the importance of aggregate demand to get the process of growth going and points, in particular, to the importance of private consumption.
3.2.4 EESO želi poudariti pomen skupnega povpraševanja za nadaljnjo rast in zlasti na pomen zasebne potrošnje.
3.2.4 The equal participation of minorities in society presupposes effective, durable and tailored measures.
3.2.4 Za enakopravno udeležbo manjšin v družbi so potrebni učinkoviti, dolgoročni in prilagojeni ukrepi.
3.2.4 The EU budget offers financial support for TEN-E investments, which can be provided only in special and duly justified cases.
3.2.4 Naložbe v TEN-E lahko dobijo finančno podporo iz proračunskih sredstev Evropske unije, vendar se ta odobri le v posebnih in utemeljenih primerih.
3.2.4 The EU is currently preparing a "health check" for the common agricultural policy, which should be an opportunity for some fine-tuning.
3.2.4 EU trenutno pripravlja pregled stanja skupne kmetijske politike, ki bo priložnost za podrobne prilagoditve.
3.2.4 The EU must step up its efforts to develop the capacity of both EU and partners' actors.
3.2.3 EU mora okrepiti prizadevanje za razvoj zmogljivosti akterjev tako v EU kot v partnerskih državah.
3.2.4 The EU must step up its efforts to develop the capacity of both EU and partners' actors.
3.2.4 EU mora okrepiti prizadevanje za razvoj zmogljivosti akterjev tako v EU kot v partnerskih državah.
3.2.4 The EU should also recognise the specific situation of young people with disabilities and the fact that they often face multiple forms of discrimination in their daily lives, specifically regarding equal opportunities for young people in the labour market and active participation by young people with disabilities in society at large.
3.2.4 EU bi morala priznati tudi specifični položaj mladih invalidov, ter dejstvo, da se v vsakdanjem življenju pogosto soočajo z različnimi oblikami diskriminacije, zlasti pri enakih možnostih za mlade na trgu dela in aktivnem sodelovanju mladih invalidov v družbi na splošno.
3.2.4 The EU should also recognise the specific situation of young people with disabilities and the fact that they often face multiple forms of discrimination in their daily lives, specifically regarding equal opportunities for young people in the labour market and active participation by young people with disabilities in society at large.
3.2.4 EU bi morala priznati tudi specifični položaj mladih invalidov,ter dejstvo, da se v vsakdanjem življenju pogosto soočajo z različnimi oblikami diskriminacije, zlasti pri enakih možnostih za mlade na trgu dela in aktivnem sodelovanju mladih invalidov v družbi na splošno.
3.2.4 The EU should organise and carry out a comprehensive campaign to raise awareness about the Convention in cooperation with public media (including social media) in order to combat prejudice against PWDs.
3.2.4 EU bi morala v sodelovanju z javnimi (in družbenimi) mediji organizirati in izpeljati celovito kampanjo za ozaveščanje o konvenciji ter se tako boriti proti predsodkom o invalidih.
3.2.4 The euro area lags behind the USA (the main competitor of the euro area and the EU) not only in terms of the overall growth rate (1.8% in the euro area, 4.2% in the USA in 2004; and 1.4% in the euro area, 2.3% in the USA on average between 2001 and 2004),8 but also in GDP per capita, which has remained at 70% of the US level since the beginning of the 1980s.
3.2.4 Območje eura zaostaja za ZDA, najpomembnejšim konkurentom območja eura oz. EU, v stopnji rasti (ta je v letu 2004 na območju eura znašala 1,8 %, v ZDA pa 4,2 %, povprečna stopnja rasti v letih 2001–2004 je na območju eura znašala 1,4 %, v ZDA 2,3 %)8, tudi BDP na prebivalca je manjši: od začetka 80-ih let ves čas dosega le 70 % BDP v ZDA.
3.2.4 The European Economic and Social Committee maintains that substantial financial resources will be required to combat HIV/AIDS through permanent prevention policies and treatment strategies involving effective and simplified therapies whose costs should be entirely regulated by the World Trade Organisation TRIPS Agreement (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) as well as support for research on a reliable and universal vaccine.
Stroški teh terapij in podpora raziskav glede zanesljivega in univerzalnega cepiva morajo biti v celoti vključeni v sporazume TRIP (Sporazum o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine) Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
3.2.4 The European supervisory authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) are called upon to take part in analysing ML/TF risk in the European Union and to issue regulatory technical standards for the Member States and financial institutions.
3.2.4 Evropski nadzorni organi (Evropski bančni organ – EBA, Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine – EIOPA in Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge – ESMA) se pozivajo, naj sodelujejo pri analizi tveganja za pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma v Evropski uniji ter izdajo regulativne tehnične standarde za države članice in finančne institucije.
3.2.4 The GJU's legal nature is complex as a result of the membership of its Administrative Board.
3.2.4 GJU ima zapleteno pravno naravo tudi zaradi sestave svojega upravnega odbora.
3.2.4 The human, social and economic consequences of pandemics in developing countries, such as the HIV/AIDS pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa, are already devastating and place enormous demands on these countries.
3.2.4 Človeške, družbene in gospodarske posledice pandemij držav v razvoju, predvsem virusa HIV in aidsa v podsaharski Afriki, so že sedaj pogubne in zahtevajo izjemno veliko pomoč.
3.2.4 The ILO could cooperate, in terms of organisational and operational methodology, in setting up the Regional Social Dialogue Committees.
3.2.4 Glede metodologije organizacije in delovanja bi MOD lahko sodelovala pri ustanovitvi regionalnih odborov za socialni dialog.
3.2.4 The ILO could cooperate, in terms of organisational and operational methodology, in setting up the Regional Social Dialogue Committees.
3.2.4 Glede metodologije organizacije in delovanja bi MOD lahko sodelovala pri vzpostavitvi regionalnih odborov za socialni dialog.
3.2.4 The initial ten-year period of the EU-Russia Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, which was drawn up in the first half of the 1990s, will expire in 2007 if either side so wishes.
3.2.4 Uvodno desetletno obdobje sporazuma o evropsko-ruskem partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki je bil sprejet v prvi polovici devetdesetih let, se bo končalo leta 2007, če bo tako želela katera od obeh strani.
3.2.4 The internationalisation of production processes at regional and global levels is generating increased intra-industry and intra-firm trade.
3.2.4 Posledica internacionalizacije proizvodnih procesov na regionalni in svetovni ravni je naraščanje trgovanja znotraj industrije in posameznih podjetij.
3.2.4 The internationalisation of production processes at regional and global levels is generating increased intra-industry and intra-firm trade.
3.2.4 Posledica internacionalizacije proizvodnih procesov na regionalni in svetovni ravni je povečan obseg trgovanja v industriji in podjetjih.
3.2.4 The issue of TSE in pigs was also the subject of an SSC study:
3.2.4 Transmisivne spongiformne encefalopatije pri prašičih so bile tudi predmet naslednjih mnenj SSC:
3.2.4 The key issue for all the working groups within CES should be to remove obstacles to business and investment, to prevent protectionism, to ensure fair competition and to negotiate the harmonisation of legislation and standards.
3.2.4 Ključna tema za vse delovne skupine v skupnem gospodarskem prostoru bi morala biti odstranitev ovir za poslovanje in naložbe, da se prepreči protekcionizem, zagotovi pravična konkurenca ter s pogajanji doseže uskladitev zakonodaje in standardov.
3.2.4 The limitations of our understanding of TSE are revealed in the following work:
3.2.4 O pomankjivem znanju na področju transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij priča naslednje delo:
3.2.4 The limitations of our understanding of TSE are revealed in the following work:
3.2.4 Pomanjkljivo poznavaje področja transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij obravnavajo naslednja dela: