natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2.3 The Commission reports that only two Member States met the deadline for notification (Finland and the United Kingdom), while a further 15 notified plans late: Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania and Spain.
2.3 Komisija navaja, da sta le dve državi članici (Finska in Velika Britanija) spoštovali rok, petnajst drugih držav pa je svoje načrte predstavilo z zamudo (Bolgarija, Češka, Danska, Nemčija, Estonija, Irska, Španija, Italija, Ciper, Litva, Malta, Nizozemska, Avstrija, Poljska in Romunija).
2.3 The Commission says the current proposal is needed because this directive is now obsolete, given the changes that have taken place since it was adopted.
2.3 Komisija svoj predlog utemeljuje z dejstvom, da je ta direktiva zaradi vmesnih sprememb zastarala.
2.3 The Commission should accelerate its work on the establishment of the European Public Private Partnership for Resilience (EP3R) and integrate it with the work of the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) and the European Governmental Group of CERTs (EGC).
2.3 Komisija bi morala pospešiti svoja prizadevanja za ustanovitev evropskega javno-zasebnega partnerstva za odpornost (EP3R, European Public Private Partnership for Resilience) in jih povezati z delom Evropske agencije za varnost omrežij in informacij (ENISA) ter evropske skupine vladnih CERT (EGC).
2.3 The Commission should consider special measures and sanctions to accelerate the process of effective Local Loop Unbundling LLU in Member States.
2.3 Komisija mora proučiti posebne ukrepe in sankcije, da bi pospešila proces dejanske razvezave krajevne zanke (LLU) v državah članicah.
2.3 The Commission should work more closely with the Internet Organisations to ensure that there is an integrated approach to provide the industry with European-level leadership for the rapid introduction of IPv6.
2.3 Komisija bi morala tesneje sodelovati z internetnimi organizacijami, da bi zagotovila usklajen pristop na evropski ravni in sektorju utrla pot za hitro uvedbo IPv6.
2.3 The Commission states that the main objective of the reform is to establish a Community system to inspect, monitor, control and ensure compliance with the rules that create the conditions required to effectively implement the CFP.
2.3 Komisija meni, da je glavni cilj reforme zagotovitev sistema Skupnosti za preglede, spremljanje, nadzor, preverjanje in izvajanje predpisov, ki ustvarja pogoje za učinkovito izvajanje predpisov skupne ribiške politike.
2.3 The Commission takes the view that by prioritising coherent, flexible and participatory approaches, it would be cheaper to take early, planned adaptation action than to pay the price of not adapting.
2.3 Če bi dali prednost skladnim, prilagodljivim in participativnim pristopom, bi bilo po mnenju Komisije pri prilagoditvi ceneje ukrepati hitro in načrtovano kot pa kasneje plačevati ceno neprilagojenosti.
2.3 The Commission then proposed a Regulation, to set up ENISA (COM(2003) 63 final).
2.3 Komisija je nato predlagala uredbo o ustanovitvi agencije ENISA (COM(2003) 63 konč.).
2.3 The Commission therefore proposes amending the Directive by:
2.3 Zato Komisija predlaga, da se direktiva spremeni
2.3 The Commission undertook to inform the Programme Committee and the European Parliament without delay of any selection decisions not subject to the management procedure.
2.3 Komisija se je zavezala, da bo programski odbor in Evropski parlament nemudoma obvestila o vseh odločitvah o izbiri, ki ne bodo obravnavane v postopku upravljanja.
2.3 The Commission wants to develop a common strategy covering all relevant EU research and innovation funding currently provided through the FP7, CIP and EU innovation initiatives such as the EIT.
2.3 V ta namen želi Komisija razviti skupno strategijo, ki bi zajela vse programe EU za financiranje raziskav in inovacij, ki so trenutno na voljo za sedmi okvirni program za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (FP7), za okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (CIP) ter pobude EU na področju inovacij, kot je Evropski inštitut za inovacije in tehnologijo (EIT).
2.3 The Commission's analysis first studies what it refers to as "Current gaps and problems", identifying them as market fragmentation and the market's inability to deliver protection and quality in the EU; difficulty in managing risks in order to build trust; and the realisation that the lack of skills among children amounts to a very real "digital skills deficit".
2.3 Komisija v svoji analizi najprej poglobljeno obravnava "trenutne vrzeli in težave", ki po njenem mnenju izhajajo iz razdrobljenosti trga in njegove nezmožnosti zagotavljanja zaščite in kakovosti v EU, iz težavnosti obvladovanja tveganj, namenjenega ustvarjanju zaupanja, in iz ugotovitve, da imajo otroci premalo znanja ter da gre za pravo "pomanjkanje digitalnega znanja".
2.3 The Commission's approach to internet governance is summarised by the COMPACT acronym5: the internet as a space of Civic responsibilities, One unfragmented resource governed via a Multi-stakeholder approach to Promote democracy and human rights, based on a sound technological Architecture that engenders Confidence and facilitates a Transparent governance both of the underlying internet infrastructure and of the services which run on top of it.
2.3 Pristop Komisije k upravljanju interneta povzema okrajšava COMPACT5: internet kot prostor državljanskih (Civic) odgovornosti, kot en (One) sam nerazdrobljen vir, katerega upravljanje temelji na pristopu z več deležniki (Multistakeholder), ki je namenjen spodbujanju (Promote) demokracije in človekovih pravic ter ki temelji na trdni arhitekturi (Architecture), ki ustvarja zaupnost (Confidence) in omogoča pregledno (Transparent) upravljanje temeljne internetne strukture in storitev, ki se znotraj nje izvajajo.
2.3 The Commission's evaluation report concludes that the current decisions do not fulfil one of their main aims, which is to ensure that intergovernmental agreements comply with European Union law.
2.3 V poročilu o oceni je Komisija izrazila mnenje, da sedanji sklepi ne izpolnjujejo enega od svojih glavnih ciljev, in sicer zagotavljanja skladnosti medvladnih sporazumov s pravom Unije.
2.3 The Commission's focus is on productive investment and the formation of long-lived tangible and intangible capital which tends to be less procyclical than shorter lived capital.
2.3 Komisija glavno pozornost posveča produktivnih naložbam ter ustvarjanju dolgotrajnih opredmetenih in neopredmetenih osnovnih sredstev, ki so običajno manj prociklična kot pa kratkotrajnejši kapital.
2.3 The Commission's guidelines for trans-European telecommunications networks include the objectives and priorities for broadband networks and digital service infrastructure in the field of telecommunications, with the aim of:
2.3 V smernicah za vseevropska telekomunikacijska omrežja Komisija določa več smernic glede ciljev in prednostnih usmeritev, predvidenih za širokopasovna omrežja in infrastrukturo za digitalne storitve na področju telekomunikacij, da bi
2.3 The Commission's guidelines for trans-European telecommunications networks include the objectives and priorities for broadband networks and digital service infrastructure in the field of telecommunications, with the aim of:
2.3 V smernicah za vseevropska telekomunikacijska omrežja Komisija določa več smernic glede ciljev in prednostnih usmeritev, predvidenih za širokopasovna omrežja in infrastrukturo za digitalne storitve na področju telekomunikacij, da bi:
2.3 The Commission's IPPC implementation action plan
2.3 Akcijski načrt Komisije za izvajanje CPNO
2.3 The Commission's processing of the regulation corresponding to this proposal for a regulation was hindered in 2009 by the negotiations on the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty.
2.3 Komisija je imela pri obravnavi uredbe, ki ustreza temu predlogu uredbe, leta 2009 težave zaradi pogajanj o sprejetju Lizbonske pogodbe.
2.3 The Commission's processing of the regulation corresponding to this proposal for a regulation3 was hindered in 2009 by the negotiations on the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty.
2.3 Komisija je imela pri obravnavi uredbe, ki ustreza temu predlogu uredbe3, leta 2009 težave zaradi pogajanj o sprejetju Lizbonske pogodbe.
2.3 The Commission's processing of the regulation corresponding to this proposal was hindered in 2009 by the negotiations on the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty.
2.3 Komisija je imela pri obravnavi uredbe, ki ustreza temu predlogu, leta 2009 težave zaradi pogajanj o sprejetju Lizbonske pogodbe.
2.3 The Commission's proposal is related to its proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport (the tachograph regulation) and its proposal amending Regulation No 561/2006 on drivers' driving times and rest periods.
2.3 Predlog Komisije je povezan z njenim predlogom uredbe o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3821/85 o tahografu (nadzorni napravi) v cestnem prometu in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 v zvezi z voznim časom in časom počitka voznikov.
2.3 The Commission's proposal is related to its proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation No. 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport (the tachograph regulation) and its proposal amending Regulation No. 561/2006 on drivers' driving times and rest periods.
2.3 Predlog Komisije je povezan z njenim predlogom uredbe o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3821/85 o tahografu (nadzorni napravi) v cestnem prometu in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 v zvezi z voznim časom in časom počitka voznikov.
2.3 The Commission's proposal was published on 27 March 2014 as part of a package of instruments to ensure long-term financing of the European economy.
2.3 Predlog Komisije je bil objavljen 27. marca 2014 kot del svežnja instrumentov, katerih cilj je dolgoročno financiranje evropskega gospodarstva.
2.3 The Commission's strategy aimed at "building trust in the Digital Single Market for e‑commerce and online services"4 identified "five main obstacles to the Digital Single Market and […] an action plan to remove them".
2.3 V strategiji Komisije za "okrepitev zaupanja v enotni digitalni trg elektronskega poslovanja in spletnih storitev"4, je opredeljenih "pet glavnih ovir za enotni digitalni trg ter načrt ukrepov za odpravo teh ovir".
2.3 The Commission, European Parliament, EESC and CoR, together with the five Atlantic Member States, jointly set up the Atlantic Forum to draw up the Action Plan.
2.3 Komisija, Parlament, EESO, OR in pet držav članic so sodelovali pri vzpostavitvi atlantskega foruma za pripravo akcijskega načrta.
2.3 The Commission’s initiative is prompted by the fact that Member States’ civil procedural law systems differ, and that the high costs and the delays entailed in cross-border small claims litigation, in particular, are disproportionate to the sums involved.
2.3 Pobudo Komisije so sprožile razlike med sistemi civilnega procesnega prava v državah članicah in nesorazmernost visokih stroškov ter zamud, zlasti pri čezmejnih sodnih postopkih v sporih majhne vrednosti, glede na zneske v teh postopkih.
2.3 The Committee believes that in these difficult times, with the serious economic, social and political crisis which is devastating Europe, innovative strategies need to be implemented to promote a more open and inclusive citizenship and boost the confidence of everyone living in the European Union.
2.3 EESO meni, da je treba v sedanjih težkih časih, ko v Evropi vlada resna gospodarska, socialna in politična kriza, uvesti inovativne strategije za spodbujanje bolj odprtega in vključujočega državljanstva ter povečati zaupanje vseh ljudi, ki prebivajo v Evropski uniji.
2.3 The Committee believes that the system, whilst limited to certain sectors and subject to thorough sectoral analyses and studies, has enabled:
2.3 Čeprav je sistem omejen na nekatere sektorje in je predmet natančnih sektorskih analiz in študij, je po mnenju Odbora omogočil:
2.3 The Committee commends the Commission's thorough preparatory work and endorses the proposed approach.
2.3 Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor ceni temeljito pripravljalno delo Komisije in predlagani postopek za reševanje opisanih težav.
2.3 The Committee feels that these provisions contribute to a form of harmonisation; nonetheless, the use of an exhaustive list, which is optional, and which allows restrictions in the scope of exceptions, where applicable, entails a number of much more specific problems as regards implementing and monitoring compliance in the case of the online dissemination of works (especially via satellite).
2.3 Odbor meni, da ti predpisi prispevajo k neke vrste uskladitvi, vendar pa neobvezna uporaba končnega seznama in možnost morebitne omejitve področja uporabe izjem v primeru spletne objave (zlasti sateliti) povzroča veliko večje probleme pri izvajanju in nadzoru.
2.3 The Committee flags up the importance of maintaining the Schengen area, the embodiment of the principles enshrined in the Treaty.
2.3 Odbor opozarja na pomen ohranitve schengenskega območja, ki udejanja načela, določena v Pogodbi.
2.3 The Committee has already done work on some of the features that CC has directly inherited, for example:
2.3 Odbor je že obravnaval nekatere vidike, ki so neposredno značilni tudi za računalništvo v oblaku:
2.3 The Committee has already expressed its views4 on the Commission's proposals for simplifying5 administrative procedures and reducing the effort these involve, in the context of the proposed decisions on the EC Seventh Framework Programme and the EURATOM Seventh Framework Programme, which were adopted on 6 April 2005.
2.3 O predlogih Komisije za poenostavitev upravnih postopkov4 in zmanjšanje stroškov, ki so povezani s tem, je Odbor pripravil mnenje5 že v okviru predlogov za sklepa o 7. okvirnem programu ES in 7. okvirnem programu Euratom, ki sta bila sprejeta 6. aprila 2005.
2.3 The Committee has already expressed its views8 on the Commission's proposals for simplifying9 administrative procedures and reducing the effort these involve, in the context of the proposed decisions on the EC Seventh Framework Programme and the EURATOM Seventh Framework Programme, which were adopted on 6 April 2005.
2.3 O predlogih Komisije za poenostavitev upravnih postopkov8 in zmanjšanje stroškov, ki so povezani s tem, je Odbor pripravil mnenje9 že v okviru predlogov za sklepa o 7. okvirnem programu ES in 7. okvirnem programu Euratom, ki sta bila sprejeta 6. aprila 2005.
2.3 The Committee has also stressed that "European standardisation is vital for the operation and consolidation of the internal market, particularly through the 'new approach' directives in the areas of […]"2.
2.3 Odbor je podčrtal tudi, da je "evropska standardizacija bistvenega pomena za delovanje in utrditev notranjega trga, predvsem zaradi direktiv, ki temeljijo na „novem pristopu“ na področju […]".2
2.3 The Committee has always supported the objective of securing the smooth running of the internal market, while also ensuring a high level of protection for human life and health, and has repeatedly supported the need to adopt a global and integrated approach to food safety in the EU.
2.3 Odbor je vedno podpiral cilj zagotoviti dobro delovanje notranjega trga ob hkratnem zagotavljanju visoke ravni varovanja življenja in zdravja ljudi in je že večkrat poudaril, da je treba na področju varnosti živil v EU sprejeti obsežen in enoten pristop.
2.3 The Committee has always supported the objective of securing the smooth running of the internal market, while also ensuring a high level of protection for human life and health, and has repeatedly supported the need to adopt a global and integrated approach to food safety in the EU.
2.3 Odbor je vedno podpiral cilj, da se zagotovi dobro delovanje notranjega trga ob hkratnem zagotavljanju visoke ravni varovanja življenja in zdravja ljudi, in že večkrat poudaril, da je treba na področju varnosti živil v EU sprejeti obsežen in enoten pristop.
2.3 The Committee has been addressing development and external cooperation in its opinions2 very attentively over a long period and in drafting the present opinion has drawn on the considerable tangible experience and insights gained through its own work on issues concerning the ACP, Euromed, the Eastern Partnership, international trade negotiations and other domains with a development angle.
2.3 Odbor se v okviru svojih mnenj2 že dolgo in intenzivno posveča razvojnemu in zunanjemu sodelovanju in je pridobil veliko izkušenj in praktičnega znanja na podlagi lastnih dejavnosti v zvezi z državami AKP, Euromedom, vzhodnim partnerstvom, mednarodnimi trgovinskimi pogajanji in drugimi področji, ki so povezana s problematiko razvoja.
2.3 The Committee has expressed its views on these issues a number of times, both in specific contexts and in the broad context of the evolution of the Lisbon Strategy and Community policies on research and innovation, the environment and education and training.
2.3 Odbor je že večkrat izrazil svoja stališča o teh vprašanjih, tako v ožjem kot širšem okviru razvoja lizbonske strategije in politik Skupnosti o raziskavah in inovacijah, okolju ter izobraževanju in usposabljanju.
2.3 The Committee has proposed that the EU adopt a common asylum policy with harmonised legislation, and a common immigration policy with legislation permitting legal immigration by means of common, transparent procedures, taking into account the interests of Europe and of the countries of origin as well as respect for fundamental rights.
2.3 Odbor je predlagal, naj EU sprejme skupno azilno politiko z usklajeno zakonodajo in skupno politiko priseljevanja z zakonodajo, ki bo s skupnimi in preglednimi postopki omogočala zakonito priseljevanje ter upoštevala interese Evrope in držav izvora, obenem pa spoštovala temeljne pravice.
2.3 The Committee is convinced that as part of teacher training, attention should be given to modern communication skills, which should help make school life relevant and interesting.3
2.3 Odbor je prepričan, da je treba pri usposabljanju učiteljev pozornost nameniti sodobnim komunikacijskim spretnostim, ki naj bi pripomogle, da šola postane bolj življenjska in zanimiva.3
2.3 The Committee is disappointed that the Commission, in its haste to embark on the reform, has not carried out sufficient consultation of stakeholders.
1.3 Odbor obžaluje, da Komisija v želji po hitrem začetku reforme ni primerno opravila potrebnega predhodnega posvetovanja z udeleženci.
2.3 The Committee notes first of all that the Commission communication refers to the role of the social partners and organised civil society in relation to only three subjects, namely human capital, pay and the general issue of "change" (see further point 4.1).
2.3 EESO kot prvo ugotavlja, da obravnava sporočilo Komisije vlogo socialnih partnerjev in organizirane civilne družbe samo v zvezi s tremi vprašanji, namreč človeškim kapitalom, plačami in splošnim vprašanjem "sprememb" (glej točko 4.1).
2.3 The Committee notes that the Dublin system was not set up to guarantee that responsibilities with regard to applicants for international protection across the whole of the EU were distributed sustainably, fairly and efficiently.
2.3 Komisija ugotavlja, da dublinski sistem ni bil zasnovan tako, da bi zagotavljal trajnostno, pravično in učinkovito delitev odgovornosti za prosilce za mednarodno zaščito po vsej EU.
2.3 The Committee opinion also contains some critical comments:
2.3 Odbor v mnenju navaja tudi nekaj kritičnih ugotovitev:
2.3 The Committee recognises the expertise and the existing monitoring mechanism within the Council of Europe in the field of human rights and fundamental freedoms and more robust coordination and cooperation between the Agency and the Council of Europe.
2.3 Odbor priznava strokovnost in obstoječ mehanizem za spremljanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v okviru Sveta Evrope ter podpira tesnejše sodelovanje in usklajevanje med Agencijo in Svetom Evrope.
2.3 The Committee recognises the expertise and the existing monitoring mechanism within the Council of Europe in the field of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the enforceable social rights of the Revised European Social Charter.
2.3 Odbor priznava strokovnost in obstoječi mehanizem za spremljanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v okviru Sveta Evrope, vključno z zavezujočimi socialnimi pravicami revidirane Evropske socialne listine.
2.3 The Committee recognises the success of the framework since its introduction.
2.3 Odbor priznava uspeh okvira, odkar je bil uveden.
2.3 The Committee stresses that the proposed Directive will retain the company’s responsibility to respect possible export limitations issued in a transfer licence.
2.3 Odbor poudarja, da bo predlagana direktiva ohranila odgovornost podjetja pri spoštovanju morebitnih izvoznih omejitev, ki jih določa dovoljenje za prenos.
2.3 The Committee stresses the need for the administrative simplification sought to truly bring about a rapid release of available funds so as to have an immediate positive impact on the recovery of the real economy.
2.3 EESO poudarja, da mora načrtovana upravna poenostavitev zares prispevati k hitri sprostitvi razpoložljivih sredstev, saj bo le tako hitro in pozitivno vplivala na spodbuditev realnega gospodarstva.
2.3 The Committee supports the adoption of a fair asylum system, i.e. an asylum system with a human face that takes account of asylum seekers' need for protection as a genuine objective to be included among the objectives for building a Europe that is also social.
2.3 Odbor podpira sprejetje pravičnega in humanega azilnega sistema, ob upoštevanju potreb prosilcev za azil po zaščiti, kar se uvršča med prave cilje za vzpostavitev Evrope, ki bi morala biti tudi socialna.
2.3 The Committee supports the Commission's proposal to extend the MODINIS programme by a year.
2.3 Odbor podpira predlog sklepa Komisije o podaljšanju programa MODINIS za eno leto.
2.3 The Committee therefore supports the general approach of the Regulation, but understands that the expression of different national interests and concerns relating to climate change may lead to some variations on the initial proposal.
2.3 Odbor se tako strinja s splošnim pristopom uredbe, pri tem pa se zaveda, da se lahko zaradi izraženih različnih nacionalnih interesov in vprašanj v zvezi z bojem proti podnebnim spremembam prvotni predlog nekoliko spremeni.
2.3 The Committee therefore welcomes the Commission's engagement with the employment policy challenges presented by the crisis, and its call for a job-rich recovery.
2.3 Odbor tako pozdravlja, da Komisija obravnava posledice krize za politiko zaposlovanja in poziva k okrevanju s številnimi novimi delovnimi mesti.
2.3 The Committee welcomes the Conclusions of the Spring Council2.
2.3 Odbor pozdravlja sklepe spomladanskega vrha2.
2.3 The Committee welcomes the fact that these amendments to the accounting directives open up new prospects, as they:
2.3 Odbor je zadovoljen, da spremembe računovodskih direktiv odpirajo perspektive, kajti:
2.3 The Committee would also draw attention to the Commission's proposals from 2010 on the harmonisation of national deposit guarantee schemes (DGS).
2.3 Poleg tega velja spomniti na predloge Komisije o usklajevanju nacionalnih sistemov zajamčenih vlog iz leta 2010 .
2.3 The Committee would draw attention to the fact that "non-authorised operators" here means operators that are regulated and controlled in one Member State and that are offering gambling services in another Member State without being in possession of a licence/concession from the country in which the player resides.
2.3 Opozoriti velja, da izraz "ponudnik brez dovoljenja" pomeni ponudnika, ki je reguliran in nadzorovan v državi članici ter ponuja svoje storitve v drugi državi članici brez potrebnega dovoljenja.