natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2.4 The EESC believes that such changes must be geared to safeguarding a social model which, while assuming different forms, also shares major common features: social and democratic rule of law, a social market economy, a high level of social expenditure, universal access to essential services, democratic labour relations systems, and a recognition of the central role played in democracy by the social partners and social organisations in general.
2.4 EESO meni, da bi cilj teh sprememb moral biti ohranitev socialnega modela, ki se kaže v različnih oblikah, ima pa tudi veliko skupnih lastnosti, kot so: socialna in demokratična pravna država; socialna tržna ekonomija; velik delež izdatkov za socialno skrbstvo; dostop do osnovnih storitev za vse; demokratični sistemi delovnih razmerij; priznavanje dejstva, da imajo v demokraciji osrednjo vlogo socialni partnerji in družbene organizacije na splošno.
2.4 The EESC believes that the EP should strengthen the European dimension of priority policies which are to receive funding, and at national level as well.
2.4 EESO meni, da mora EP okrepiti evropsko razsežnost političnih prednostnih nalog, za katere so predvidena finančna sredstva, tudi na nacionalni ravni.
2.4 The EESC can also understand the Commission's argument that the proposal will imply a continuation of the practice that has been followed since 1992 and ensure parallelism between veterinary fund and market organisation measures.
2.4 Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor ima razumevanje tudi za pogled Komisije, da tak predlog pomeni nadaljevanje prakse, ki obstaja od leta 1992, in da zagotavlja paralelizem med Veterinarskim skladom in ukrepi tržnih ureditev.
2.4 The EESC can also understand the Commission's argument that the proposal will imply a continuation of the practice that has been followed since 1992 and ensure parallelism between veterinary fund and market organisation measures.
2.4 Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor ima razumevanje tudi za pogled komisije, po katerem je predlog enak nadaljevanju prakse, ki obstaja od leta 1992, in po katerem se zagotavlja paralelizem veterinarskega sklada in ukrepov tržnih organizacij.
2.4 The EESC considers that the historical roots of the current economic and financial crisis in Europe make it necessary to implement structural reforms in the institutional, social and political system.
2.4 EESO meni, da je treba zaradi zgodovinskih razlogov za sedanjo gospodarsko in finančno krizo v Evropi izvesti strukturne reforme v institucionalnem, socialnem in političnem sistemu.
2.4 The EESC considers that the individual and citizenship must be at the heart of Community policies and actions, the EESC stresses the implementation of the Charter of fundamental rights as an indispensable instrument of territorial cohesion.
2.4 EESO meni, da je treba v okviru politik in ukrepov Skupnosti osrednje mesto nameniti posamezniku in državljanstvu, zato poudarja pomen izvajanja Listine o temeljnih pravicah, ki je nepogrešljiv instrument teritorialne kohezije.
2.4 The EESC delivered an opinion4 on the proposal for a Regulation on the coordination of social security schemes.
2.4 EESO je prav tako že sprejel mnenje o uredbi o uskladitvi sistemov socialne varnosti4.
2.4 The EESC does not believe that the Commission's reform scenario – securing market balance by cutting prices – can meet its objective, which is to maintain a strong European beet farming and sugar industry and to treat developing countries supplying preferential sugar with respect.
2.4 EESO ne verjame, da bi lahko odločitev za reformo, ki jo je sprejela Komisija in ki si z znižanjem cen prizadeva doseči ravnovesje na trgu, dosegla svoj cilj, ki je dolgoročno ohraniti stabilno pridelavo sladkorne pese in sladkorno industrijo v Evropi ter spoštovati države v razvoju, ki so dobaviteljice preferenčnega sladkorja.
2.4 The EESC does not believe that the Commission's reform scenario – securing market balance by cutting prices – can meet its objective, which is to maintain a strong European beet farming and sugar industry and to treat developing countries supplying preferential sugar with respect.
2.4 EESO ne verjame, da bi lahko odločitev za reformo, ki jo je sprejela Komisija in ki si z znižanjem cen prizadeva doseči ravnovesje na trgu, dosegla svoj cilj, ki je dolgoročno ohraniti trdno pridelavo sladkorne pese in sladkorno industrijo v Evropi ter spoštovati države v razvoju, ki so dobaviteljice preferenčnega sladkorja.
2.4 The EESC does not intend to comment on the Commission's schematic evaluation of each policy area, but would just note that the Commission's exposition makes for discouraging reading.
2.4 EESO ne želi komentirati shematske ocene posameznih političnih področij, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, temveč samo opozoriti, da pregled strategije ne spodbuja branja.
2.4 The EESC drew up an opinion4 in support of updating the regulation.
2.4 EESO je pripravil mnenje4, v katerem je podprl posodobitev uredbe.
2.4 The EESC embraces and fully supports the importance of the principle "no one is left behind", which applies to all SDGs and targets and which therefore should be fully mainstreamed when developing partnerships, policies and action to implement and monitor the 2030 Agenda.
2.4 EESO sprejema in v celoti podpira pomen načela, da nihče ne bo zapostavljen, ki velja za vse cilje trajnostnega razvoja in vmesne cilje, zato bi ga bilo treba v celoti upoštevati tudi pri oblikovanju partnerstev, politik in ukrepov za izvajanje in spremljanje Agende 2030.
2.4 The EESC envisages the funds being provided by: the EIB, the TEN-E programme, the European Economic Recovery Plan, the 2020 European Fund for Energy, Climate Change and Infrastructure (the Marguerite Fund) and by the instruments for pre-accession, the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument and the Framework programme for research and technological development.
2.4 EESO pri tem računa na finančna sredstva EIB,programov vseevropskih energetskih omrežij, evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, Evropskega sklada 2020 za energetiko, podnebne spremembe in infrastrukturo (ali sklad Marguerite) ter predpristopnih instrumentov, Evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva ter okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj.
2.4 The EESC feels that it is essential for the regulation to favour the development of aquaculture in Europe5, since it is a growing sector which will create many opportunities in the future, if it is not hampered by the current proposal in its present form.
2.4 EESO meni, da je bistvenega pomena, da uredba podpira razvoj ribogojstva v Evropi5, saj gre za rastoč sektor, ki bo v prihodnosti ustvaril veliko priložnosti , če ga ne bo oviral ta predlog v svoji trenutni obliki.
2.4 The EESC feels that it is essential for the regulation to favour the development of aquaculture in Europe5, since it is a growing sector which will create many opportunities in the future, if it is not hampered by the current proposal in its present form.
2.4 EESO meni, da je bistvenega pomena, da uredba podpira razvoj ribogojstva v Evropi5, saj gre za rastoč sektor, ki bo v prihodnosti ustvaril veliko priložnosti, če ga ne bo oviral ta predlog v svoji trenutni obliki.
2.4 The EESC feels that Member States should guarantee to participants that the experience and qualifications which they acquire during programmes will be recognised.
2.4 EESO meni, da naj države članice udeležencem programov zagotovijo, da bodo izkušnje in izobrazbo, ki so jih slednji pridobili v okviru teh programov, tudi priznale.
2.4 The EESC feels that producing a large amount of information does not necessarily guarantee the quality of this information.
2.4 Po mnenju EESO velika količina informacij ne pomeni nujno, da so te informacije tudi dobre.
2.4 The EESC feels that the Commission has paid too little attention to the unintended negative side-effects of the Single Market.
2.4 EESO meni, da se je Komisija premalo posvetila nehotenim negativnim stranskim učinkom enotnega trga.
2.4 The EESC feels that the Commission has paid too little attention to the unintended negative side-effects of the Single Market.
2.4 EESO meni, da se je Komisija premalo posvetila nenačrtovanim negativnim stranskim učinkom enotnega trga.
2.4 The EESC felt that this own-initiative opinion should be drawn up order to add its views to the discussion initiated by the Commission on how to move towards more effective resource management, which should be the basic pillar of the CFP, in order to guarantee the long-term sustainability of resources while ensuring the competitiveness of Community fleets.
2.4 EESO meni, da mora pripraviti to mnenje na lastno pobudo, da bi dodal svoj pogled razpravi, ki jo je začela Komisija o približanju k bolj učinkovitemu upravljanju z viri, ki bi moral biti temelj skupne ribiške politike, če želimo zagotoviti dolgotrajno trajnost virov in konkurenčnost ladjevja Skupnosti.
2.4 The EESC fully agrees with the fact that weak investment is hampering Europe's recovery.
2.4 EESO se v celoti strinja, da šibke naložbe ovirajo okrevanje evropskega gospodarstva.
2.4 The EESC further notes that the current general system for the recognition of professional education and training is somewhat cumbersome and precludes the mutual recognition of certificates issued between the Member States from the application of the relevant provisions of the Convention.
2.4 Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor ugotavlja, da je sedanji splošni sistem priznavanja strokovne izobrazbe in usposabljanja nekoliko okoren in izključuje vzajemno priznavanje spričeval, izdanih med državami članicami, od uporabe zadevnih določb Konvencije.
2.4 The EESC has already in the past emphasised the need to set up world class research infrastructures in Europe and to encourage them to link up into networks3.
2.4 EESO je v preteklosti že poudaril potrebo, da se v Evropi vzpostavijo raziskovalne infrastrukture svetovnega merila ter da se spodbudi njihovo mrežno povezovanje3.
2.4 The EESC has also called for the common tax base debate to be extended from the core issue to encompass cross-border problems.
2.4 EESO je pozval tudi k razširitvi razprave o skupni davčni osnovi, ki naj bi poleg osnovnih vprašanj zajela tudi čezmejne probleme.
2.4 The EESC has also noted insufficient implementation in the new Member States in Eastern Europe.
2.4 EESO ugotavlja tudi nezadostno izvajanje v novih državah članicah iz vzhodne Evrope.
2.4 The EESC has been fully engaged in EU aviation policies and legislation through the adoption of a number of opinions and by undertaking stakeholder events and public hearings.
2.4 EESO vsestransko sodeluje v politikah in zakonodaji EU na področju letalstva s sprejemanjem številnih mnenj in organizacijo dogodkov za deležnike in javnih predstavitev.
2.4 The EESC has commented on these issues several times4, as well as on numerous legislative initiatives which require interoperability structures such as the Services Directive (2006/123/EC), the Public Procurement Directive (2004/18/EC), the INSPIRE Directive (2007/2/EC) and the Public Sector Information (PSI) Directive (2003/98/EC).
2.4 Odbor je že večkrat izrazil svoje mnenje o tej tematiki4 in tudi o številnih zakonodajnih pobudah, ki zahtevajo interoperabilnostne strukture, kot so Direktiva 2006/123/ES o storitvah, Direktiva 2004/18/ES o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil, Direktiva 2007/2/ES "INSPIRE" in Direktiva 2003/98/ES o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja.
2.4 The EESC has commented on these issues several times5, as well as on numerous legislative initiatives which require interoperability structures such as the Services Directive (2006/123/EC), the Public Procurement Directive (2004/18/EC), the INSPIRE Directive (2007/2/EC) and the Public Sector Information (PSI) Directive (2003/98/EC).
2.4 Odbor je že večkrat izrazil svoje mnenje o tej tematiki5 in tudi o številnih zakonodajnih pobudah, ki zahtevajo interoperabilnostne strukture, kot so Direktiva 2006/123/ES o storitvah, Direktiva 2004/18/ES o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil, Direktiva 2007/2/ES "INSPIRE" in Direktiva 2003/98/ES o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja.
2.4 The EESC has examined the expected development of the energy market in detail in a number of its previous opinions2 3 4 and considers that the conclusions and recommendations that it has adopted are still relevant.
2.4 EESO je v številnih predhodnih mnenjih234 že temeljito preučil pričakovani razvoj trga z energijo, pri čemer meni, da so njegovi zaključki in priporočila še vedno aktualni.
2.4 The EESC has maintained a strong and consistent interest in this subject.
2.4 EESO se za to ves čas zelo zanima.
2.4 The EESC has prepared Opinions on each PINC, as the Treaty requires.
2.4 EESO je v skladu z zahtevami Pogodbe pripravil mnenje o vsakem PINC.
2.4 The EESC has published a range of opinions giving its views on the various forms of discrimination.
2.4 EESO je objavil več mnenj, v katerih je izrazil svoja stališča do različnih oblik diskriminacije.
2.4 The EESC has repeatedly emphasised the need here to draw on all unutilised employment potential (women with children, young people, school drop-outs, underskilled workers, people with disabilities, people with health problems, etc.), which includes mobilising the potential of older people.
2.4 EESO je v zvezi s tem večkrat poudaril, da je treba izkoristiti vse neizkoriščene zaposlitvene možnosti (samohranilk, mladih, oseb, ki so prezgodaj opustile šolanje, nizko kvalificiranih, invalidov, oseb z zdravstvenimi težavami itd.), in pri tem pozval k mobilizaciji potenciala starejših.
2.4 The EESC has repeatedly emphasised the need here to draw on all unutilised employment potential (women with children, young people, school drop-outs, underskilled workers, people with disabilities, people with health problems, etc.), which includes mobilising the potential of older people.
2.4 EESO je v zvezi s tem večkrat poudaril, da je treba izkoristiti vse neizkoriščene zaposlitvene možnosti (samohranilk, mladih, osipnikov, nizko kvalificiranih, invalidov, oseb z zdravstvenimi težavami itd.), in pri tem pozval k mobilizaciji potenciala starejših.
2.4 The EESC has stressed that "Member States have a heavy responsibility to ensure that EU measures are properly transposed into their national law and enforced" and that it is important that "the resulting regulatory framework at national level is both as balanced in terms of content and as simple as possible for business, employees, consumers and all civil society players"4.
2.4 EESO je poudaril, da „imajo države članice veliko odgovornost pri zagotavljanju ustreznega prenosa ukrepov EU v nacionalno zakonodajo in njihovega izvajanja“ ter da je pomembno, „da je tako oblikovan zakonodajni okvir na nacionalni ravni vsebinsko čimbolj uravnotežen in obenem čim enostavnejši za podjetja, delojemalce, potrošnike in vse akterje civilne družbe“4.
2.4 The EESC has taken the initiative of presenting the present opinion in response to the current mid-term review of the DCI, in conjunction with the present Structured Dialogue process5, with the aim of making recommendations backing the fundamental role of civil society organisations in cooperation6, with a particular focus on the contribution to development made by the social partners.
2.4 EESO je kot odziv na trenutni vmesni pregled IRS in v povezavi s sedanjim procesom strukturiranega dialoga5 sprejel pobudo za pripravo tega mnenja, da se oblikujejo priporočila v podporo temeljni vlogi organizacij civilne družbe v sodelovanju6, s posebnim poudarkom na prispevku socialnih partnerjev k razvoju.
2.4 The EESC has undertaken a wide range of work relevant to this issue including opinions on compensation of victims of crime4, trafficking5, sexual exploitation and abuse and child pornography6, rights of the child7, EU Counter-Terrorism Policy8, e-inclusion9 and cybercrime10.
2.4 EESO je v zvezi s tem vprašanjem opravil veliko dela, vključno z mnenji o odškodnini žrtvam kaznivih dejanj4, trgovini z ljudmi5, spolni zlorabi in spolnemu izkoriščanju otrok ter otroški pornografiji6, o otrokovih pravicah7, politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu8, e-vključevanju9 in kibernetski kriminaliteti10.
2.4 The EESC has undertaken a wide range of work relevant to this issue including opinions on compensation of victims of crime5, trafficking6, sexual exploitation and abuse and child pornography7, rights of the child8, EU Counter-Terrorism Policy9, e-inclusion10 and cybercrime11.
2.4 EESO je v zvezi s tem vprašanjem opravil veliko dela, vključno z mnenji o odškodnini žrtvam kaznivih dejanj5, trgovini z ljudmi6, spolni zlorabi in spolnemu izkoriščanju otrok ter otroški pornografiji7, o otrokovih pravicah8, politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu9, e-vključevanju10 in kibernetski kriminaliteti11.
2.4 The EESC has welcomed these results1, but also sees two major problems:
2.4 EESO je te rezultate pozdravil1, opozarja pa tudi na dve veliki težavi:
2.4 The EESC has welcomed these results1, but also sees two major problems:
2.4 EESO je te rezultate1 pozdravil, opozarja pa na dve veliki težavi:
2.4 The EESC highlights a second concern related to delays in launching the new structural funds programme.
2.4 EESO opaža tudi zaskrbljenost zaradi zamud pri uvajanju novega programa strukturnih skladov.
2.4 The EESC highlights and acknowledges the fact that differences between Member States are reflected in the way that the role of consumers' organisations is seen, the way they are organised, the resources and the degree of knowledge and specialisation that they have and the representativeness that they have to ensure.
2.4 EESO poudarja in ugotavlja, da se razlike med državami članicami odražajo tudi v načinu, kako se razlaga vloga potrošniških organizacij, načinu njihove organizacije, sredstvih, stopnji specializacije in predstavniške vloge, ki jo imajo.
2.4 The EESC hopes that the social dialogue will be reinforced and is convinced that EWCs are crucial to achieving this aim, since they introduce structures for contact and mutual understanding which can promote a culture of social dialogue in the Member States.
2.4 EESO upa, da se bo socialni dialog okrepil, in je prepričan, da so evropski sveti delavcev ključni za doseganje tega cilja, ker uvajajo strukture za povezovanje in medsebojno razumevanje, ki lahko spodbujajo kulturo socialnega dialoga v državah članicah.
2.4 The EESC however is concerned that the Commission's proposal is being presented during a period of great uncertainty in the EU.
2.4 Vendar EESO izraža zaskrbljenost, ker Komisija predstavlja svoj predlog v času precejšnje negotovosti, ki vlada v EU.
2.4 The EESC insists on the need of consistency between free trade goals and sustainable development goals in on-going negotiations in the framework of WTO or currently undertaken by the EU on services, environmental goods and in the implementation of existing WTO agreements.
2.4 EESO vztraja, da je potrebna skladnost med cilji proste trgovine in cilji trajnostnega razvoja v pogajanjih v okviru STO ter v trenutnih pogajanjih EU o storitvah, okoljskih dobrinah in izvajanju obstoječih sporazumov STO.
2.4 The EESC intends to use this opinion to help identify the added value that the personal services sector can offer the Europe 2020 strategy, in order to identify needs in terms of qualified human resources and new occupational profiles, with a view to innovative social prospects, more and better jobs and improved public wellbeing, as a result of the enhanced integration that ensues from a more cohesive society.
2.4 S tem mnenjem želi EESO prispevati k določitvi dodane vrednosti, ki jo osebne storitve lahko prinesejo strategiji Evropa 2020, da bi opredelili potrebe po kvalificirani delovni sili in novih poklicnih profilih, ter zagotovili inovativne socialne perspektive, nova in boljša delovna mesta ter več blaginje za vse državljane, to pa z boljšim vključevanjem prek večje socialne kohezije.
2.4 The EESC intends to use this opinion to help identify the added value that the personal services sector can offer the Europe 2020 strategy, in order to identify needs in terms of qualified human resources and new occupational profiles, with a view to innovative social prospects, more and better jobs and improved public wellbeing, as a result of the enhanced integration that ensues from a more cohesive society.
2.4 S tem mnenjem želi EESO prispevati k določitvi dodane vrednosti, ki jo osebne storitve lahko prinesejo strategiji Evropa 2020, da bi opredelili potrebe po kvalificirani delovni sili in novih poklicnih profilih, ter zagotovili inovativne socialne perspektive, nova in boljša delovna mesta ter več blaginje za vse državljane, to pa z boljšim vključevanjem prek večje socialne kohezije.
2.4 The EESC invites the Commission to take into account the differences between the existing systems of corporate governance.
2.4 EESO poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva razlike med obstoječimi sistemi upravljanja podjetij.
2.4 The EESC is concerned by the fact that there is a gap in employment rate between non-disabled and disabled persons.
2.4 EESO izraža zaskrbljenost glede dejstva, da obstaja velika razlika v stopnji zaposlenosti med neinvalidnimi in invalidnimi osebami.
2.4 The EESC is pleased that in this context the European social partners accept the current Commission proposal as the basis for revising the directive and note common positions on several points of substance that should be taken into account in the further revision process.
2.4 EESO pozdravlja, da so v okviru tega evropski socialni partnerji sprejeli ta predlog Komisije kot podlago za revizijo direktive in ugotovili, da v bistvenih točkah obstajajo skupna stališča, ki jih je treba upoštevati v nadaljnjem postopku revizije.
2.4 The EESC is strongly in favour of significant improvements in the existing Community legal framework, given that the differences are emerged between the national legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions on medicinal products and that these differences could hinder intra-Community trade and affecting the good functioning of the internal market.
2.4 EESO močno podpira pomembne izboljšave v sedanjem pravnem okviru Skupnosti, ker so se med nacionalnimi zakonodajnimi, ureditvenimi in upravnimi določbami o zdravilih pojavile razlike, ki bi lahko ovirale trgovino znotraj Skupnosti in vplivale na dobro delovanje notranjega trga.
2.4 The EESC is strongly in favour of significant improvements in the existing Community legal framework, provided that the differences are emerged between the national legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions on medicinal products and that these differences could hinder intra-Community trade and affecting the good functioning of the internal market.
2.4 EESO močno podpira pomembne izboljšave v sedanjem pravnem okviru Skupnosti, ker so se med nacionalnimi zakonodajnimi, ureditvenimi in upravnimi določbami o zdravilih pojavile razlike, ki bi lahko ovirale trgovino znotraj Skupnosti in vplivale na dobro delovanje notranjega trga.
2.4 The EESC issued opinions on both legislative procedures1.
2.4 EESO je pripravil mnenji o obeh zakonodajnih postopkih1.
2.4 The EESC might endorse the Commission's determination to encourage early ratification by the Member States.
2.4 EESO podpira odločenost Komisije, da spodbudi države članice k čimprejšnji ratifikaciji.
2.4 The EESC notes that since 2000 the number of individuals migrating for educational purposes has tripled, thanks to educational and international exchange programmes offered to the Member States by the Commission.
2.4 EESC ugotavlja, da se je z izobraževalnimi in izmenjevalnimi programi Komisije število državljanov v državah članicah EU, ki so se v želji po izobraževanju podali v tujino, od leta 2000 potrojilo.
2.4 The EESC pays tribute to the activities of rural women's organisations and similar networks in a number of Member States, which may be independent or integrated into farmers' associations.
2.4 EESO zelo ceni dejavnosti organizacij kmečkih žena in podobnih mrež, ki včasih samostojno, včasih pa pod okriljem kmečkih združenj delujejo v več državah članicah.