natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5.4 The EESC realises that the problems associated with low household income and the various forms of consumer pressure – which are partly responsible for the fragility that draws consumers and households into illegal loans and parallel money markets – cannot be resolved solely by regulating the credit sector.
5.4 EESO se zaveda, da težav, ki so povezane z nizkimi dohodki gospodinjstev in različnimi oblikami spodbud k potrošnji in ki so med drugim razlog za nestabilnost, zaradi katere so potrošniki in gospodinjstva dovzetni za nezakonita posojila in vzporedne denarne trge, ni mogoče odpraviti zgolj z regulacijo posojil.
5.4 The EESC recalls Article 14 of Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on services of general economic interest which lays down that "Without prejudice to Article 4 of the Treaty on European Union or to Articles 93, 106 and 107 of this Treaty, and given the place occupied by services of general economic interest in the shared values of the Union as well as their role in promoting social and territorial cohesion, the Union and the Member States, each within their respective powers and within the scope of application of the Treaties, shall take care that such services operate on the basis of principles and conditions, particularly economic and financial conditions, which enable them to fulfil their missions".
5.4 EESO opozarja, da člen 14 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije v zvezi s storitvami splošnega gospodarskega pomena določa: "Brez poseganja v člen 3a Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in člene 93, 106 in 107 te pogodbe ter ob upoštevanju položaja, ki ga imajo službe splošnega gospodarskega pomena v okviru skupnih vrednot Unije, pa tudi njihove vloge pri pospeševanju socialne in teritorialne kohezije, skrbijo Unija in države članice v mejah svojih pristojnosti na področju uporabe Pogodb za to, da takšne službe delujejo na podlagi načel in pogojev, zlasti ekonomskih in finančnih, ki jim omogočajo izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog."
5.4 The EESC recognises that accessibility is crucial if immediately applicable political and civil rights are to be exercised, and this must be reflected in specific accessibility plans, accompanied by standards and penalties which are binding upon all public authorities and with the possibility for disabled citizens to invoke mechanisms to uphold their rights.
5.4 EESO ugotavlja, da je dostopnost ključnega pomena za neposredno uresničevanje političnih in državljanskih pravic in da je zato treba pripraviti posebne načrte za dostopnost, ki vključujejo standarde in sankcije, zavezujoče za vse organe oblasti; poleg tega morajo invalidi imeti dostop do mehanizmov, s pomočjo katerih lahko svoje pravice iztožijo.
5.4 The EESC recommends that EU development aid should provide for a percentage of its funding to be invested in interventions that benefit children.
5.4 EESO priporoča, da se odstotek razvojne pomoči EU nameni za naložbe v prid otrokom.
5.4 The EESC recommends that EU development aid should provide for a percentage of its funding to be invested in interventions that benefit children.
5.4 EESO priporoča, da se zagotovi, da se odstotek razvojne pomoči EU vloži v naložbe v prid otrokom.
5.4 The EESC recommends that the Commission pave the way towards granting access to controlled medical use of medicinal cannabis and to the full range of substitution treatment modalities.
5.4 EESO priporoča, da Komisija začne ustvarjati pogoje za zagotovitev dostopa do nadzirane uporabe terapevtske konoplje v zdravstvene namene in vseh vrst nadomestnega zdravljenja.
5.4 The EESC regrets that the Commission strategy only provides for cooperation between Member States and the Commission, ignoring the recommendations made in previous opinions regarding the need to provide for cooperation with economic operators.
5.4 EESO izraža obžalovanje, da Komisija v predloženi strategiji predvideva samo možnost sodelovanja med državami članicami in Komisijo in ni upoštevala priporočil, ki jih je Odbor podal v prejšnjih mnenjih, da bi bilo treba razmisliti tudi o možnosti sodelovanja z gospodarskimi subjekti.
5.4 The EESC sees these as examples of best practice which should be extended across the EU.
5.4 EESO jih obravnava kot primer dobrih praks, ki bi jih bilo treba razširiti po vsej EU.
5.4 The EESC stresses once again the need for a common European definition of disability, which will make EU disability policy more effective.
5.4 EESO ponovno poudarja, da potrebujemo skupno evropsko opredelitev invalidnosti, ki bi prispevala k večji učinkovitosti invalidske politike EU.
5.4 The EESC stresses the need for greater coordination between the bodies responsible for EU development cooperation and the other players involved in the process, including international bodies and organisations, together with greater cohesion between development cooperation and other EU policies.
5.4 EESO poudarja, da sta potrebna večje usklajevanje med organi, pristojnimi za razvojno sodelovanje EU, in vsemi akterji v tem procesu, vključno z mednarodnimi oragnizacijami in organi, kot tudi večja skladnost med politiko razvojnega sodelovanja in drugimi politikami EU.
5.4 The EESC strongly backs the inclusion of the Emission Trading System (ETS), which constitutes (2008) 73% of the international market value of certificates.
5.4 EESO močno podpira vključitev trgovanja z evropskimi emisijskimi kuponi, ki so leta 2008 predstavljali 73 % svetovne tržne vrednosti teh kuponov.
5.4 The EESC supports taking into account the stage of development of poor developing countries, with few demands being made on the Least Developed Countries (LDCs).
5.4 EESO podpira upoštevanje stopnje razvoja revnih držav v razvoju in da se najmanj razvitim državam postavlja le malo zahtev.
5.4 The EESC supports taking into account the stage of development of poor developing countries, with few demands being made on the Least Developed Countries (LDCs).
5.4 EESO podpira upoštevanje stopnje razvoja revnih držav v razvoju, najmanj razvitim državam pa je bilo postavljenih le malo zahtev.
5.4 The EESC supports the Commission proposal that micro-enterprises should be exempted from any requirement to pay fees for registration as it is crucial that not only does this legitimate trade continue (for the sake of the micro businesses and those employed therein) but that the controls are understood and implemented as widely as possible.
5.4 EESO podpira predlog Komisije, da bi bilo treba mikro podjetja izvzeti iz obveznosti plačevanja pristojbin za registracijo, saj je ključno, da se ta zakonita trgovina nadaljuje (zaradi mikro podjetij samih in tistih, ki so v njih zaposleni) ter da se nadzor obravnava in izvaja čim širše.
5.4 The EESC supports the Commission's policies for tackling the issue of equal treatment for men and women and non-discrimination in general.
5.4 EESO podpira politike Evropske komisije za enako obravnavo moških in žensk in za nediskriminacijo nasploh.
5.4 The EESC supports the proposals made by UNCHR to set up teams of asylum experts to help in all border control operations in the EU.
5.4 EESO podpira predloge UNCHR za ustanovitev skupin strokovnjakov za azil, ki bi pomagali pri vseh dejavnosti mejne kontrole v EU.
5.4 The EESC supports this Commission strategy, but notes that, to date, neither the strategy nor the 2012 declaration has been adequately implemented.
5.4 Odbor podpira to strategijo Komisije, vendar ugotavlja, da se niti strategija niti izjava iz leta 2012 doslej nista ustrezno izvajali.
5.4 The EESC takes a critical view of the EU-level policy approach to alcohol, a substance causing much greater social problems; it therefore maintains the position set out in previous corrective opinions10, which urged the Commission to act decisively in this respect.
5.4 EESO je kritičen glede pristopa Evropske unije k alkoholizmu, ki povzroča veliko večje družbene probleme, ter ostaja pri stališču, ki ga je izrazil v prejšnjih izboljševalnih mnenjih,10 v katerih poziva Komisijo, naj na tem področju odločno ukrepa.
5.4 The EESC takes a critical view of the EU-level policy approach to alcohol, a substance causing much greater social problems; it therefore maintains the position set out in previous corrective opinions10, which urged the Commission to act decisively in this respect.
5.4 EESO je kritičen glede pristopa Evropske unije k alkoholizmu, ki povzroča veliko večje družbene probleme, ter ostaja pri stališču, ki ga je izrazil v preteklih mnenjih,10 v katerih poziva Komisijo, naj na tem področju odločno ukrepa.
5.4 The EESC therefore calls on the Commission to take action on two fronts: it should act swiftly to resolve and/or simplify the most straightforward and obvious technical and bureaucratic problems, and present a proposal to reform the regulation as rapidly as possible in order to tackle the more complex institutional, legal and organisational issues.
5.4 Odbor zato poziva Komisijo k dvotirnemu pristopu: sprejetju takojšnjih ukrepov za reševanje in/ali poenostavitev najpreprostejših ter najočitnejših tehničnih in upravnih težav ter čim prejšnji predložitvi predloga za spremembo zadevne uredbe, ki bo odpravil bolj zapletena institucionalna, pravna in organizacijska vprašanja.
5.4 The EESC thinks that, in attempting to improve quality, transparency, independence, plurality of views and competition in the provision of ratings, the Commission needs to set up an independent European rating agency that would issue independent ratings (for which the issuer would pay), but would not issue sovereign ratings, thus sidestepping any accusation of conflict of interest.
5.4 EESO meni, da Komisija mora v svojih prizadevanjih za izboljšanje kakovosti, preglednosti, neodvisnosti in raznolikosti stališč ter konkurence pri zagotavljanju bonitetnih ocen ustanoviti neodvisno evropsko bonitetno agencijo, ki bi izdajala neodvisne bonitetne ocene (za katere bi izdajatelj plačal), ne bi pa izdajala bonitetnih ocen držav in se tako izognila morebitnim obtožbam glede navzkrižja interesov.
5.4 The EESC thinks that, in attempting to improve quality, transparency, independence, plurality of views and competition in the provision of ratings, the Commission needs to set up an independent European rating agency that would issue independent sovereign debt ratings,  in order to protect the common interest.
5.4 EESO meni, da Komisija mora v svojih prizadevanjih za izboljšanje kakovosti, preglednosti, neodvisnosti in raznolikosti stališč ter konkurence pri zagotavljanju bonitetnih ocen ustanoviti neodvisno evropsko bonitetno agencijo, ki bi izdajala neodvisne bonitetne ocene o državnem dolgu, in tako zavarovati skupni interes.
5.4 The EESC thus believes that in the current climate, further developments in these sectors require:
5.4 EESO zato meni, da so za nadaljnji razvoj tega sektorja v sedanjih razmerah potrebni:
5.4 The EESC thus encourages the Commission to further simplify Horizon 2020 and to respect the Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation which envisage a "wider acceptance of the usual cost accounting practices of the beneficiaries".
5.4 EESO zato spodbuja Komisijo, naj ta program še poenostavi in spoštuje pravila za sodelovanje v njem, ki predvidevajo „širše priznavanje običajnih računovodskih metod upravičencev“.
5.4 The EESC trusts that this legislation will be adopted and implemented as soon as possible and strongly reaffirms the principle that the new Turkish Economic and Social Council must be able to operate independently and with the necessary financial and human resources.
5.4 EESO želi, da bi bil ta zakonski osnutek čimprej sprejet in uveljavljen ter izrecno poudarja načelo, da mora biti novemu turškemu ekonomskemu in socialnemu svetu omogočeno, da bo lahko deloval neodvisno ter razpolagal s potrebnimi finančnimi in človeškimi viri.
5.4 The EESC underlines that the Directive gives shape to a set of procedural rules which establish the relationship between contracting parties in public procurement.
5.4 EESO poudarja, da direktiva oblikuje vrsto postopkovnih pravil, ki določajo razmerje med pogodbenimi strankami v javnem naročanju.
5.4 The EESC urges the Commission to provide support during and after crises to sectors in difficulty in order to re-establish confidence and boost consumption.
5.6 EESO poziva Komisijo, naj med krizami in po njih zagotovi podporo sektorjem v težavah, da obnovi zaupanje in spodbudi porabo.
5.4 The EESC wants to contribute to the discussion, after considering the arguments presented, by making a choice.
5.4 EESO želi že sedaj, po preučitvi predstavljenih predlogov, sprejeti odločitev, da bi prispeval k razpravi.
5.4 The EESC welcomes the Commission's simplification proposal, which aims to ensure that the regulatory framework helps to stimulate entrepreneurship and innovation in micro- and small businesses to make them more competitive and enable them to fully exploit the potential of the internal market.
5.4 EESO pozdravlja predlog Komisije za poenostavitev, s katerim naj bi zagotovili, da bo ureditveni okvir prispeval k spodbujanju podjetništva in inovativnosti malih in mikropodjetij, da bodo bolj konkurenčna in bolje izkoriščala potencial notranjega trga.
5.4 The EESC welcomes the establishment of a European Border Guard drawing on a standing corps of 1 500 experts (border guards).
5.4 EESO pozdravlja predlog o ustanovitvi evropske mejne straže, ki jo bo sestavljalo 1 500 strokovnjakov (mejnih policistov).
5.4 The EESC welcomes the fact that data will be available electronically.
5.4 EESO pozdravlja dejstvo, da bodo podatki na voljo v elektronski obliki.
5.4 The EESC welcomes the review of European Neighbourhood Policy and the recognition of a link between instability, poverty, inequality and lack of opportunities, which can increase vulnerability to radicalisation.
5.4 EESO pozitivno ocenjuje revizijo evropske sosedske politike in ugotovitev povezave med nestabilnostjo, revščino, neenakostjo in pomanjkanjem priložnosti, ki lahko povečajo dovzetnost za radikalizacijo.
5.4 The EESC would also reiterate its concerns regarding the endless barriers to the registration of companies with European statutes, whether they come down to the unattractiveness of the existing statute, which is a real fiasco, or to persistent delays and obstacles in developing a simplified statute that is available to a significant number of businesses of all sizes.
5.4 EESO ponavlja tudi svojo zaskrbljenost zaradi neskončnih ovir v zvezi z registracijo družb z evropskim statutom, pa naj gre za premajhno privlačnost sedanjega statuta, kar dokazuje resnični neuspeh, ali pa za nenehno zavlačevanje in blokade v zvezi z oblikovanjem poenostavljenega statuta, ki bi bil končno na voljo velikemu številu podjetij vseh velikosti.
5.4 The EESC would argue that key aspects of the reform should include:
5.4 EESO meni, da so za reformo pomembne naslednje točke:
5.4 The EESC would like the EU to have suitable, highly harmonised legislation, so that immigration can be channelled through flexible and transparent legal procedures in which third-country nationals are fairly treated, with comparable rights and obligations to those enjoyed by EU citizens.
5.4 Odbor želi, da bi EU lahko imela ustrezno skupno zakonodajo z visoko stopnjo usklajenosti, da bi priseljevanje usmerjali s pomočjo zakonitih, prožnih in transparentnih postopkov, da bi bili državljani tretjih držav obravnavani pravično, tako da bi bile njihove pravice in obveznosti primerljive s tistimi, ki jih imajo državljani EU.
5.4 The EESC would point out that the other provisions of the Charter apply to everybody, regardless of nationality.
5.4 EESO ugotavlja, da se preostale določbe Listine uporabljajo za vse osebe ne glede na njihovo nacionalnost.
5.4 The EESC's Group III organised a major conference on volunteering to mark the first ever Polish Presidency of the European Council and the European Year of Volunteering 2011 in Warsaw on 30 September 2011 in the Presidential Palace, attended by the President of Poland, the EU Commissioner for Employment and Social Affairs and the Polish Social Policy and Labour Minister, among other key speakers.
5.4 III. skupina EESO je ob prvem poljskem predsedovanju Evropskemu svetu v predsedniški palači v Varšavi 30. septembra 2011 organizirala veliko konferenco o prostovoljstvu in evropsko leto prostovoljstva 2011, pri kateri so bili med glavnimi govorniki poljski predsednik, komisar EU za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter poljski minister za socialno politiko in delo.
5.4 The EESC, together with the Commission, is engaged in the activities of the European Integration Forum, and wishes once again to emphasise the importance of civil society organisations being involved and consulted at the various levels of governance.
5.4 EESO skupaj s Komisijo sodeluje pri dejavnostih Evropskega foruma za vključevanje in želi ponovno poudariti pomen sodelovanja organizacij civilne družbe in posvetovanja z njimi na različnih ravneh upravljanja.
5.4 The EESC10 has pointed out that jobs should match each individual's training and vocational experience, with no age discrimination, and that all the Member States must transpose and apply the directive on equal treatment in employment and occupation (2000/78/EC).
5.4 EESO10 je poudaril, da bi morala delovna mesta ustrezati usposobljenosti in poklicnim izkušnjam vsakega posameznika, da ne bi smelo prihajati do diskriminacije na podlagi starosti in da bi morale vse države članice v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesti direktivo o enakem obravnavanju pri zaposlovanju in delu ter jo uporabljati (2000/78/ES).
5.4 The EESC7 has pointed out that jobs should match each individual's training and vocational experience, with no age discrimination, and that all the Member States must transpose and apply the directive on equal treatment in employment and occupation (2000/78/EC).
5.4 EESO7 je poudaril, da bi morala delovna mesta ustrezati usposobljenosti in poklicnim izkušnjam vsakega posameznika, da ne bi smelo prihajati do diskriminacije na podlagi starosti in da morajo vse države članice v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesti direktivo o enakem obravnavanju pri zaposlovanju in delu ter jo uporabljati (2000/78/ES).
5.4 The EFSI has far greater funding than other Community initiatives and as such enables investment in large-scale European projects worth more than EUR 10 billion, supported mainly by private capital11.
5.4 Za EFSI je na voljo občutno več sredstev kot za druge pobude Unije, zato omogoča naložbe v velike evropske projekte v vrednosti več kot 10 milijard EUR, podprte predvsem z zasebnim kapitalom11.
5.4 The EIA (page 44) maintains that the draft directive is in compliance with TRIPS, but the arguments it puts forward are unconvincing in the light of “parallel” situations in the sphere of Community legislation.
5.4 EIA (stran 44) trdi, da je osnutek direktive v skladu s sporazumom TRIPS, vendar predstavljeni argumenti niso prepričljivi, če upoštevamo “vzporedna” stanja v okviru zakonodaje EU.
5.4 The EIA (page 44) maintains that the draft directive is in compliance with TRIPS, but the arguments it puts forward are unconvincing.
5.4 EIA (stran 44) trdi, da je osnutek direktive v skladu s sporazumom TRIPS, vendar predstavljeni argumenti niso prepričljivi.
5.4 The ENI draft regulation includes provisions to simplify the instrument in a number of aspects, striking a balance between flexibility and the focus on policy goals and key areas of cooperation.
5.4 Predlog uredbe o ENI vključuje določbe o poenostavitvi instrumenta z več vidikov, s čimer je doseženo ravnovesje med prožnostjo ter osredotočenostjo na cilje politike in ključna področja sodelovanja.
5.4 The entry of foreign pests and diseases not endemic to the EU would, in addition to posing a threat to certain agricultural products, lead to a rise in production costs for European farmers and consequently a decline in the profitability of farms.
5.4 Ne glede na grožnjo, ki jo vnos škodljivcev ali bolezni tujega izvora predstavlja za kmetijsko dejavnost v nekaterih pridelovalnih sektorjih, se z njim povečajo stroški proizvodnje evropskih kmetov in posledično ogrozi donosnost njihovih kmetij.
5.4 The environmental component must be integrated into the strategies of businesses, including SMEs, as part of a sustainability approach.
5.4 Okoljski vidik kot del koncepta trajnosti mora biti vključen v strategije podjetij, torej tudi v strategije MSP.
5.4 The ETS currently operates in thirty countries (the 27 Member States plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway).
5.4 Sistem trgovanja z emisijami trenutno deluje v tridesetih državah (poleg 27 držav članic EU še Islandija, Lihtenštajn in Norveška).
5.4 The EU and Member States ought therefore to equip themselves with effective instruments to guard their economies from speculation and excessive focus on financial activities on the part of industrial and economic groups, which, rather than benefiting countries' wealth and wellbeing, present a genuine danger for social cohesion and employment.
5.4 EU in države članice bi zato morale imeti na voljo učinkovite instrumente za zaščito svojih gospodarstev pred špekulacijami in čezmernim osredotočanjem industrijskih in gospodarskih skupin na finančne dejavnosti, ki ne prispevajo k povečanju premoženja in blaginje posameznih držav, ampak predstavljajo resnično nevarnost za socialno kohezijo in zaposlovanje.
5.4 The EU and Member States ought therefore to equip themselves with effective instruments to guard their economies from speculation and excessive focus on financial activities on the part of industrial and economic groups, which, rather than benefiting countries' wealth and wellbeing, present a genuine danger for social cohesion and employment.
5.4 EU in države članice bi zato morale imeti na voljo učinkovite instrumente za zaščito svojih gospodarstev pred špekulacijami ter čezmernim osredotočanjem industrijskih in gospodarskih skupin na finančne dejavnosti, ki ne prispevajo k povečanju premoženja in blaginje posameznih držav, ampak predstavljajo resnično nevarnost za socialno kohezijo in zaposlovanje.
5.4 The EU and the international community are gravely concerned about another legislative initiative that suggests limiting foreign investment in media companies in Russia to 20% from January 2016.
5.4 EU in mednarodna skupnost izražata resno zaskrbljenost zaradi še ene zakonodajne pobude, v skladu s katero naj bi se delež tujega kapitala v ruskih medijskih družbah z januarjem 2016 omejil na 20 %.
5.4 The EU has of course limited competence in this field, and application of the principle of subsidiarity means that most of the primary responsibilities for local transport and land use planning will remain at local and national levels.
5.4 EU ima na tem področju seveda omejene pristojnosti, uporaba načela subsidiarnosti pa pomeni, da bodo za večino dejavnosti na področju lokalnega prometa in načrtovanja rabe zemljišč še naprej v prvi vrsti odgovorni lokalni in državni organi.
5.4 The EU is not monolithic in its achievements vis-à-vis sustainable development.
5.4 EU glede napredka v smeri trajnostnega razvoja ne ponuja nikakršnega skupnega odgovora.
5.4 The EU may only delegate the exercise of its legislative competence when specifically authorised to do so, and may only delegate the powers conferred on it (Article 13(2) TEU).
5.4 EU lahko prenese izvajanje svojih zakonodajnih pristojnosti le, če je za to izrecno pooblaščena, in lahko prenese le pristojnosti, ki so ji dodeljene (člen 13(2) PEU).
5.4 The EU should actively require and defend the rights and possibilities of European companies to invest upstream in energy source development and infrastructures.
5.4 EU bi morala aktivno zahtevati in braniti pravice in možnosti evropskih podjetij za predhodne naložbe v razvoj energetskih virov in infrastrukture.
5.4 The EU's Central Asia Strategy in 2007 was followed by the setting up of the EU Human Rights Dialogue Process, with six rounds of such dialogues since conducted with most countries (eight with Uzbekistan, five with Kyrgyzstan).
5.4 Strategiji EU za Srednjo Azijo iz leta 2007 je sledila uvedba procesa dialoga o človekovih pravicah, ki je bil z večino držav izveden v šestih krogih (osmih z Uzbekistanom, petih s Kirgizistanom).
5.4 The EU's strategy for Africa is different from China's.
5.4 Strategija EU za Afriko se razlikuje od kitajske strategije.