natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2.4 The Commission proposes to incorporate the 26 existing measures and the proposed new measures – such as the funding of NATURA 2000, forest-environment measures or the training of locally elected representatives in devising regional projects – under three priority axes with their own specific goals, with minimum funding for each axis as follows:
2.4 Komisija predlaga združitev 26 obstoječih ukrepov in novih predlogov ukrepov, kot so financiranje programa NATURA 2000, gozdarsko-okoljski ukrepi ali izobraževanje izvoljenih lokalnih predstavnikov za izdelavo prostorskih načrtov, v tri prednostne cilje, vsak od njih pa ima svoje specifične cilje, s tem da je delež minimalnega financiranja pri posameznem prednostnem cilju takšen:
2.4 The Commission proposes two variants: a one-step reform and a two-step reform.
2.4 Komisija predlaga dve možnosti: enostopenjsko in dvostopenjsko reformo.
2.4 The Commission proposes two variants: a one-step reform and a two-step reform.
2.4 Komisija predlaga različico reforme v enem koraku in postopno različico.
2.4 The Commission published a set of strategic guidelines in 2013 on developing sustainable aquaculture in the European Union, set out in document COM(2013) 229 final.
2.4 Evropska komisija je leta 2013 objavila strateške smernice za trajnostni razvoj akvakulture v Evropski uniji.
2.4 The Commission published a set of strategic guidelines in 2013 on developing sustainable aquaculture in the European Union, set out in document COM(2013) 229 final.
2.4 Evropska komisija je leta 2013 objavila strateške smernice za trajnostni razvoj akvakulture v Evropski uniji.
2.4 The Commission sets out to address this complex legal framework through a proposal that aims to clarify the application of Directive 1999/5/EC, and replace it in order to eliminate unnecessary administrative burdens for businesses and administrations by increasing spectrum flexibility and easing administrative procedures for spectrum use.
2.4 Za obravnavo tega zapletenega pravnega okvira je Komisija predstavila predlog, da bi pojasnila uporabo Direktive 1999/5/ES in jo nadomestila, s čimer bi odpravila nepotrebna upravna bremena za podjetja in uprave tako, da bi povečala prožnost spektra in olajšala upravne postopke pri uporabi tega spektra.
2.4 The Commission started reviewing the legal framework for motor vehicle type-approval already in 2010.
2.4 Komisija je pregled pravnega okvira za homologacijo motornih vozil začela že leta 2010.
2.4 The Commission states quite clearly that the discussion and proposals are not limited to merely removing discriminatory obstacles for firms and the risk of double taxation, but also aim to enable the Member States to protect their tax bases.
2.4 Komisija jasno poudarja, da pri razpravi in predlogih ne gre le za odpravo diskriminacijskih ovir za podjetja in zmanjšanje tveganja dvojnega obdavčevanja, temveč tudi za zaščito davčne osnove držav članic.
2.4 The Commission states that "renewable energy sources are largely indigenous, they do not rely on the future availability of conventional sources of energy, and their predominantly decentralised nature makes our economies less vulnerable to volatile energy supply".
2.4 Po mnenju Komisije so obnovljivi viri energije „večinoma domači viri, niso odvisni od prihodnje razpoložljivosti konvencionalnih virov energije, njihova pretežna decentraliziranost pa zmanjšuje ranljivost naših gospodarstev zaradi nestalne oskrbe z energijo“.
2.4 The Commission states that the comprehensive body of legislation currently in place allows the EU to deal with emerging risks or emergency situations without causing distortions to trade but points out that the Union's system of import controls could be made more consistent by reviewing and consolidating the existing sectoral acts.
2.4 Komisija trdi, da veljavna celovita zakonodaja EU omogoča obvladovanje nastajajočih tveganj ali izrednih razmer brez izkrivljanj trgovine, vendar navaja, da sistem Unije za nadzor uvoza lahko postane skladnejši s pregledom in okrepitvijo veljavnih sektorskih predpisov.
2.4 The Commission states that the proposed policy orientations take into account the results of the third road safety action programme (2001-2010), which showed that, regrettably, the ambitious objective of halving the number of fatalities will not be achieved.
2.4 Komisija opozarja, da predlagane politične smernice upoštevajo rezultate tretjega akcijskega programa za varnost v cestnem prometu za obdobje 2001–2010, ki kažejo, da ambiciozni cilj zmanjšanja števila smrtnih žrtev za polovico žal ni bil dosežen.
2.4 The Commission wishes to suggest policy guidelines and initiatives to the Member States to address the reform needs identified, inter alia, in the 2011 country-specific recommendations under the European semester.
2.4 Komisija želi državam članicam predlagati smernice za politike in pobude za obravnavo potreb po reformah, med drugim opredeljenih v priporočilih za posamezne države za leto 2011 v okviru evropskega semestra.
2.4 The Commission's analysis emphasises three areas relating to governance which are crucial for success:
2.4 Komisija v analizi navaja tri področja, povezana z upravljanjem, ki so ključna za uspeh:
2.4 The Commission's definition of corporate governance is also somewhat partial in nature.
2.4 Komisija korporativno upravljanje pojmuje nekoliko pristransko.
2.4 The Commission's intention is to update and modernise the principles set out in Directive 95/46/EC on data protection (as amended) so as to guarantee privacy rights in the future within the digital society and its networks.
2.4 Namen Komisije je posodobiti načela iz konsolidirane Direktive 95/46/ES o varstvu podatkov, da bi tako v prihodnosti zagotovila pravice posameznika na področju spoštovanja zasebnosti v digitalni družbi in njenih omrežjih.
2.4 The Commission's main concern is to ensure coordination of the member countries' economic policies by means of a coordinated series of measures and instruments to increase convergence between budgetary policies and supervisory systems.
2.4 Glavna skrb Komisije ostaja zagotoviti usklajevanje ekonomskih politik držav članic z izdelanim nizom ukrepov in instrumentov za večjo konvergenco proračunskih politik in sistemov nadzora.
2.4 The Commission's plan lays down immediate-term actions and other, longer-term actions to be taken over a span of six years.
2.4 Načrt, ki ga je določila Komisija, predvideva takojšnje ukrepe in ukrepe, ki se izvedejo kasneje, in sicer v 6 letih.
2.4 The Commission's plan lays down immediate-term actions and other, longer-term actions to be taken over a span of six years.
2.4 Načrt, ki ga je določila Komisija, predvideva takojšnje ukrepe in ukrepe, ki se izvedejo pozneje, in sicer v 6 letih.
2.4 The Commission's proposal has not been the subject of an opinion by the European social partners.
2.4 Socialni partnerji na evropski ravni niso bili zaprošeni za mnenje o predlogu Komisije.
2.4 The Commission's tasks also include the comprehensive monitoring and coordination of the activity of the National Agencies – the offices established by the authorities responsible for youth policy in each country participating in the programme.
2.4 Naloge Komisije zajemajo tudi obsežno spremljanje in usklajevanje dejavnosti nacionalnih agencij – uradov, ki so jih imenovale oz. ustanovile oblasti, pristojne za mladinsko politiko, v vsaki državi, ki sodeluje v programu.
2.4 The Commission, which is working on a document on work and poverty, has declared  2010 the European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion.
2.4 Komisija, ki pripravlja dokument o delu in revščini, je leto 2010 razglasila za evropsko leto boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti.
2.4 The Commission, which is working on a document on work and poverty, has declared 2010 the European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion.
2.4 Komisija, ki pripravlja dokument o delu in revščini, je leto 2010 razglasila za evropsko leto boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti.
2.4 The Commission’s proposal
2.4 Predlog Komisije
2.4 The Commission’s proposal suggests the setting of a monetary minimum duty and establishing a tax "floor" for all cigarettes sold in the EU allowing to address health concerns for all categories of cigarettes.
2.4 Predlog Komisije predvideva določitev najnižjega denarnega zneska trošarine in določitev spodnje meje obdavčitve za vse cigarete, ki se prodajajo v EU, s čimer je omogočeno upoštevanje skrbi za zdravje pri vseh razredih cigaret.
2.4 The Committee adopted an opinion on the above-mentioned regulations at its plenary session on 7 December 2011,1 in which it commented on the proposal as follows: "The Committee welcomes the Commission's proposal to merge the features of driver cards with those of driving licences, which would improve security and reduce the administrative burden where practicable".
2.4 Odbor je o uredbah iz točke 2.3 na plenarnem zasedanju 7. decembra 2011 sprejel mnenje1, v katerem je o tem predlogu navedel: "Odbor pozdravlja predlog Komisije glede združitve funkcionalnosti vozniške kartice z vozniškim dovoljenjem, s čimer bi se povečala varnost in zmanjšale upravne obremenitve, kolikor je to v praksi mogoče."
2.4 The Committee adopted an opinion on the above-mentioned regulations at its plenary session on 7 December 2011,1 in which it commented on the proposal as follows: "The Committee welcomes the Commission's proposal to merge the features of driver cards with those of driving licences, which would improve security and reduce the administrative burden where practicable".
2.4 Odbor je o uredbah iz točke 2.3 na plenarnem zasedanju 7. decembra 2011 sprejel mnenje2, v katerem je o tem predlogu navedel: "Odbor pozdravlja predlog Komisije glede združitve funkcionalnosti vozniške kartice z vozniškim dovoljenjem, s čimer bi se povečala varnost in zmanjšale upravne obremenitve, kolikor je to v praksi mogoče."
2.4 The Committee adopted an opinion on the above-mentioned regulations at its plenary session on 7 December 2011,2 in which it commented on the proposal as follows: "The Committee welcomes the Commission's proposal to merge the features of driver cards with those of driving licences, which would improve security and reduce the administrative burden where practicable".
2.4 Odbor je o uredbah iz točke 2.3 na plenarnem zasedanju 7. decembra 2011 sprejel mnenje2, v katerem je o tem predlogu navedel: "Odbor pozdravlja predlog Komisije glede združitve funkcionalnosti vozniške kartice z vozniškim dovoljenjem, s čimer bi se povečala varnost in zmanjšale upravne obremenitve, kolikor je to v praksi mogoče."
2.4 The Committee agrees there is merit in a mutually beneficial and accelerating convergence mechanism, but questions the necessity of introducing a new instrument, the CCI, when it is not clear how it adds value to the already existing structural fund supports such as the Cohesion Fund or European Social Fund (ESF).
2.4 Odbor se strinja, da ima vzajemno koristen mehanizem za pospeševanje konvergence prednosti, vendar pa dvomi, da je treba uvesti nov instrument za konvergenco in konkurenčnost, saj ni jasno, kakšno dodano vrednost ima v primerjavi z obstoječimi shemami podpore iz strukturnih skladov, kot sta Kohezijski sklad ali Evropski socialni sklad.
2.4 The Committee also hopes that the funds released as a result of these measures can be prioritised as far as possible to benefit SMEs (e.g. construction industry SMEs, in the case of the proposal on energy efficiency in housing), as well as social economy organisations.
2.4 EESO izraža tudi željo po tem, da bi sredstva, ki se bodo sprostila s temi ukrepi, kolikor je le mogoče (prednostno) lahko izkoristila MSP (na primer MSP v gradbeništvu v primeru predloga o energetski učinkovitosti stanovanjskih objektov) ter organizacije socialne ekonomije.
2.4 The Committee also reiterates its comment that European cooperation on research and development is an effective catalyst for European integration and cohesion.
2.4 Odbor poleg tega ponovno poudarja, da je evropsko sodelovanje na področju raziskav in razvoja učinkovit katalizator evropske integracije in kohezije.
2.4 The Committee appreciates the Commission's professional work, especially the use of computer modelling, on evaluating the various major options for aviation security charges based on the international principles in force.
2.4 Odbor ceni strokovno delo Komisije, zlasti uporabo računalniškega modeliranja pri ocenjevanju različnih glavnih možnosti za obračunavanje pristojbin za varovanje v letalstvu na podlagi veljavnih mednarodnih načel:
2.4 The Committee appreciates the suggestion concerning the establishment of one-stop-shops so that companies set up in a quick and simple way.
2.4 Odbor pozdravlja predlog glede vzpostavljanja vstopnih točk VEM ("vse na enem mestu" – »one-stop-shops«), ki bi omogočale hitro in enostavno ustanovitev podjetja.
2.4 The Committee attaches key importance to the role of civil society in the implementation and follow-up mechanisms for those facets of the agreements that relate to sustainable development.
2.4 Odbor poudarja velik pomen vloge civilne družbe pri uvajanju in sprotnem spremljanju delovanja mehanizmov za tiste vidike sporazumov, ki so povezani s trajnostnim razvojem.
2.4 The Committee believes that various comments and recommendations concerning the content of the draft Regulation should be put to the Commission.
2.4 Odbor meni je treba različne pripombe in priporočila v zvezi z vsebino osnutka uredbe predložiti Komisiji.
2.4 The Committee believes that various comments and recommendations concerning the content of the draft Regulation should be put to the Commission.
2.4 Odbor meni, da je treba različne pripombe in priporočila v zvezi z vsebino osnutka uredbe predložiti Komisiji.
2.4 The Committee believes there is an urgent need to develop and publicise an OR logo, and to promote these regions in all European countries and even in other countries neighbouring the ORs, in order to diversify and enhance the quality and sustainability of their tourism.
2.4 EESO meni, da je nujno treba oblikovati in javnosti predstaviti logotip "najbolj oddaljenih regij" ter te regije promovirati v vseh evropskih državah pa tudi drugih državah, ki so blizu najbolj oddaljenih regij, da se omogoči diverzifikacija ter večja kakovost in trajnost turizma.
2.4 The Committee considers it important to emphasise that the current energy labelling directive is one of the most successful Community instruments, as it is based on:
2.4 Po mnenju Odbora je treba poudariti, da je direktiva o energijskem označevanju eden najuspešnejših instrumentov Skupnosti zato, ker temelji na:
2.4 The Committee considers that the Commission's proposal involves a certain abandonment of its responsibility to the Community banana production sector, since in practice it empties the banana CMO of its content, transferring financial support for this product to the general budget for the Posei programmes, with no specific chapter for bananas.
2.4 Odbor meni, da obravnavani predlog, s tem ko skupni ureditvi trga banan praktično odvzame vso vsebino in ko finančno pomoč za ta proizvod prenese v globalni proračun, namenjen programom POSEI, ne ustvari pa posebnega poglavja za banane, Komisijo v določeni meri razbremenjuje odgovornosti za sektor proizvodnje banan v Skupnosti.
2.4 The Committee considers the issue of representativeness of civil society actors to be particularly important, as it goes hand in hand with their democratic legitimacy.
2.4 Po mnenju Odbora je vprašanje reprezentativnosti akterjev civilne družbe izredno pomembno, saj je povezano z njihovo demokratično legitimnostjo.
2.4 The Committee considers the issue of representativeness of civil society actors to be particularly important, as it goes hand in hand with their democratic legitimacy.
2.4. Po mnenju Odbora je vprašanje reprezentativnosti akterjev civilne družbe posebno pomembno, saj je povezano z njihovo demokratično legitimnostjo.
2.4 The Committee directs the attention of the Commission to previous Opinions by the EESC which support the Regulatory Framework and make recommendations on how the policies for development and growth of the electronic communications sector could be improved16 to advance the i2010 strategy.
2.4 Odbor Komisijo opozarja na svoja prejšnja mnenja, ki podpirajo regulativni okvir in vsebujejo priporočila o tem, kako bi lahko izboljšali politike za razvoj in rast sektorja elektronskih komunikacij16 in s tem napredovali s strategijo i2010.
2.4 The Committee firmly believes that "the free movement of goods is an essential driver for competitiveness and the economic and social development of the European single market and that reinforcement and updating of the requirements for the marketing of safe, high-quality products are key factors for consumers, businesses and European citizens"3.
2.4 EESO je prepričan, "da je prosti pretok blaga ena glavnih gonilnih sil za konkurenčnost ter gospodarsko rast in socialni razvoj evropskega enotnega trga ter da sta krepitev in posodabljanje pogojev trženja varnih, kakovostnih izdelkov ključna dejavnika za potrošnike, podjetja in evropske državljane".3
2.4 The Committee has a major concern that the proposal does not promote or support wider representation from organised civil society in the Management Board and the Fundamental Rights Forum (thereafter "the Forum") of the new Agency.
2.4 Glavna skrb Odbora je, da predlog ne spodbuja ali podpira večjega vključevanja organizirane civilne družbe v upravni odbor ter forum za temeljne pravice (v nadaljevanju forum) nove Agencije.
2.4 The Committee has commented several times on the issue6.
2.4 Odbor je že večkrat izrazil svoje stališče o tej problematiki6.
2.4 The Committee has commented several times on the issue7.
2.4 Odbor je že večkrat izrazil svoje stališče o tej problematiki7.
2.4 The Committee has recently commented on this issue on two occasions:
2.4 EESO je to temo v zadnjem času obravnaval v dveh mnenjih:
2.4 The Committee has, on several occasions3, called for a review of the current legal framework on standardisation so that it can respond to the latest developments and challenges in European standardisation and simplified legislation, which would be more in line with the principle of "better lawmaking"4, the approach taken by Industrial Policy in an Enlarged Europe5 and the internal market strategy priorities for the period 2003-20066.
2.4 Odbor je že večkrat3 pozval k preoblikovanju sedanjega pravnega okvira za standardizacijo, da bi ga bolje prilagodili najnovejšemu razvoju in izzivom na področju evropskih tehničnih standardov in na področju poenostavitve pravnih aktov, bolje uskladili z načelom boljše priprave zakonodaje4 ter prilagodili zahtevam industrijske politike v razširjeni Evropi5 in prednostnim nalogam strategije za notranji trg 2003-20066.
2.4 The Committee however is not being asked to give its Opinion on the parallel Proposal for a Regulation that aims to establish actual transitional arrangements relating to existing BITs - a matter of considerable concern to many, although the Commission stresses it is not about to rewrite these.
2.4 Odbor pa ni bil zaprošen za pripravo mnenja o vzporednem predlogu uredbe o prehodnih ureditvah za obstoječe dvostranske sporazume držav članic o naložbah, pri čemer gre za vprašanje, ki številnim povzroča precejšnje skrbi, čeprav Komisija poudarja, da uredbe ne namerava preoblikovati.
2.4 The Committee is convinced that from a negative phase like the one we are living there may emerge as protagonists, and quickly recover, only those enterprises that will be able to be competitive in the markets of high quality traditional products and high technology.
2.4 Odbor je prepričan, da bodo iz sedanjih kriznih razmer kot protagonisti hitro izšla in si opomogla samo tista podjetja, ki bodo konkurenčna na trgih visoko kakovostnih tradicionalnih izdelkov in visoke tehnologije.
2.4 The Committee is convinced that from a negative phase like the one we are living there may emerge as protagonists, and quickly recover, only those enterprises that will be able to be competitive in the markets of high quality traditional products and high technology.
2.4 Odbor je prepričan, da si bodo od kriznih razmer, v katerih se nahajamo, hitro opomogla in nastopila kot osrednji akter samo tista podjetja, ki bodo konkurenčna na trgih visoko kakovostnih tradicionalnih proizvodov in visoke tehnologije.
2.4 The Committee is disappointed that a Commission  document seems to disregard human rights and broad social policy aspects in relation to drug use; at the same time, the document emphasises regulatory and criminal law instruments which are rarely subject to scientific evaluation procedures, whose effectiveness is questionable based on existing data, and which are not particularly cost-effective2.
2.4 Odbor obžaluje, ker dokument na področju uživanja drog zanemarja medsektorske vidike socialne politike, povezane s človekovimi pravicami, ter ravno nasprotno poudarja pravne in kazenske instrumente, ki so slabo znanstveno raziskani, katerih učinkovitosti trenutno razpoložljivi podatki skoraj ne dokazujejo in ki so dražji.2
2.4 The Committee is disappointed that a Commission document seems to disregard human rights and broad social policy aspects in relation to drug use; at the same time, the document emphasises regulatory and criminal law instruments which are rarely subject to scientific evaluation procedures, whose effectiveness is questionable based on existing data, and which are not particularly cost-effective2.
2.4 EESO obžaluje, ker dokument na področju uživanja drog zanemarja medsektorske vidike socialne politike, povezane s človekovimi pravicami, ter ravno nasprotno poudarja pravne in kazenske instrumente, ki so slabo znanstveno raziskani, katerih učinkovitosti trenutno razpoložljivi podatki skoraj ne dokazujejo in ki so dražji.2
2.4 The Committee is disappointed that a Commission document seems to disregard human rights and broad social policy aspects in relation to drug use; at the same time, the document emphasises regulatory and criminal law instruments which are rarely subject to scientific evaluation procedures, whose effectiveness is questionable based on existing data, and which are not particularly cost-effective2.
2.4 Odbor obžaluje, ker dokument na področju uživanja drog zanemarja medsektorske vidike socialne politike, povezane s človekovimi pravicami, ter ravno nasprotno poudarja pravne in kazenske instrumente, ki so slabo znanstveno raziskani, katerih učinkovitosti trenutno razpoložljivi podatki skoraj ne dokazujejo in ki so dražji.2
2.4 The Committee is fully aware of the extremely challenging current geopolitical situation, and notes that the proposal for a directive does not contain definitions clear enough to guarantee the rights recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights and enshrined in the Treaty.
2.4 Odbor se zaveda velikih izzivov sedanjih geopolitičnih razmer in ugotavlja, da opredelitve pojmov v predlogu direktive niso dovolj jasne, da bi državljanom zagotovile pravice, ki so priznane v Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah in določene v Pogodbi.
2.4 The Committee is fully aware that the use of satellite navigation across a great number of fields of activity helps to increase security, and in the commercial sphere, to increase revenue, provided that there is operational continuity and no interruption to the supply of services.
2.4 EESO se v celoti zaveda, da se bo lahko zaradi razširjenosti satelitske navigacije na številnih področjih dejavnosti povečala varnost, pri trženju pa tudi prihodki, če bo zagotovljeno nemoteno obratovanje brez prekinitev izvajanja storitev.
2.4 The Committee is of the opinion that the Union needs more investment in projects that promote structural change and that can help to put Member States' economies on a path of sustainable growth.
24.4 Odbor meni, da Unija potrebuje več naložb v projekte, ki spodbujajo strukturne spremembe in lahko pripomorejo k usmeritvi gospodarstev držav članic na pot trajnostne rasti.
2.4 The Committee issued an earlier opinion on this subject13, which included the following recommendations:
2.4 Odbor je to temo13 že obravnaval in med drugim priporočil: