natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5.5.1 The EESC believes that, in the Member States, the people who work in business and for operators, as well as in the customs authorities, will be faced with an acceleration of the reforms that have already been started and that, despite the training that they will be offered, some of them, including officials, should have the option of benefiting from some kind of social package if they are unable to cope with the changes.
5.5.1 Odbor meni, da se bodo v državah članicah ljudje, zaposleni v podjetjih, pri gospodarskih subjektih in v carinski upravi soočili s hitro izvedbo reform, ki so se že začele, in bi kljub izobraževanju, ki jim bo na voljo, nekateri, zlasti uradniki morali imeti na voljo drugačne rešitve v primeru neprilagoditve na spremembe.
5.5.1 The EESC calls on the Member States to develop targeted and permanent information campaigns on the achievements of European integration and its added value, and to put in place European civic education from primary school level upwards.
5.5.1 EESO poziva države članice, da pripravijo ciljno naravnane in stalne obveščevalne kampanje o dosežkih evropske integracije in njeni dodani vrednosti ter da že v osnovni šoli začnejo z »evropsko državljansko vzgojo«.
5.5.1 The EESC calls upon Member States to make the elimination of health inequalities a priority and to ensure that the policies which have an impact on social, economic and health issues are better co-ordinated, monitored and evaluated in order to promote good practice and disseminate information across the EU.
5.5.1 EESO poziva države članice, naj odpravljanje neenakosti na področju zdravja uvrstijo med svoje prednostne naloge in zagotovijo boljše usklajevanje, spremljanje in vrednotenje politik z vplivom na socialna, ekonomska in zdravstvena vprašanja ter tako spodbujajo dobre prakse in razširjajo informacije po vsej EU.
5.5.1 The EESC considers that strengthening cooperation with international organisations, in particular the ILO, the WHO and the OECD, should be a priority in order to reduce accidents and occupational diseases worldwide.
5.5.1 EESO meni, da mora biti okrepljeno sodelovanje z mednarodnimi organizacijami, zlasti z MOD, SZO in OECD, prednostnega pomena za zmanjšanje števila nezgod in poklicnih bolezni po vsem svetu.
5.5.1 The EESC endorses the Commission's view on the role of port authorities and the diversity of port management systems in Europe.
5.5.1 EESO podpira stališče Evropske komisije o vlogi pristaniških oblasti in raznolikosti sistemov za upravljanje pristanišč v Evropi.
5.5.1 The EESC finds the Commission's proposed policy roadmap for implementing the social investment package too defensive and thus calls for a more detailed and longer-term roadmap (at least until 2020).
5.5.1 EESO meni, da je politični načrt Komisije za izvedbo svežnja ukrepov za socialne naložbe premalo ambiciozen, zato Komisijo poziva, naj pripravi bolj konkreten in dolgoročen načrt (vsaj do leta 2020).
5.5.1 The EESC firmly rejects the idea of granting widespread and indiscriminate access to tax and social security registers.
5.5.1 EESO odločno zavrača idejo o splošnem in brezpogojnem dostopu do davčnih registrov in registrov sistemov socialne varnosti.
5.5.1 The EESC is pleased to endorse the new Commission website "for a second chance policy at http//ec.europa.eu/sme2chance.
5.5.1 EESO pozdravlja novo spletno stran Komisije za politiko druge priložnosti na http//ec.europa.eu/sme2chance.
5.5.1 The EESC strongly welcomes proposals to use Structural Funds more effectively to reduce poverty and promote social cohesion but highlights the need to increase the amount of funding available, particularly for deprived communities.
5.5.1 EESO odločno pozdravlja predloge za učinkovitejšo uporabo strukturnih skladov za zmanjšanje revščine in spodbujanje socialne kohezije, poudarja pa, da je treba povečati obseg razpoložljivih sredstev, še posebej za prikrajšane skupnosti.
5.5.1 The EESC wishes to emphasise that the proposals fully respect the sovereignty of the Member States which ultimately, under the directives in question, implement their own legislation through their own institutions in the relevant fields.
5.5.1 EESO poudarja, da so ti predlogi v celoti skladni z načelom suverenosti držav članic, ki se navsezadnje v okviru direktiv lahko opirajo na lastno zakonodajo in lastne ustanove na ustreznih področjih.
5.5.1 The EESC would like e-inclusion to be open to minorities, be they immigrant or non-immigrant, like the Roma.
5.5.1 EESO želi, da se tem skupinam ponudi možnost e-vključevanja ne glede na to, ali so priseljenci ali ne, kot so Romi.
5.5.1 The EESC would like e-inclusion to be open to minorities, be they immigrant or non‑immigrant, such as the Roma.
5.5.1 EESO želi, da se tem skupinam ponudi možnost e-vključevanja ne glede na to, ali so priseljenci ali ne, kot so Romi.
5.5.1 The EU Member States differ considerably in terms of eligibility conditions and scope of social security, not least for young people.
5.5.1 V državah članicah EU obstajajo velike razlike pri dostopu do storitev socialnega varstva in njegovem obsegu, in sicer ne samo za mlade.
5.5.1 The EU Member States differ considerably in terms of eligibility conditions and scope of social security, not least for young people.
5.5.1 V državah članicah EU obstajajo velike razlike pri dostopu do storitev socialnega varstva in njihovem obsegu, in sicer ne samo za mlade.
5.5.1 The EU should have an appropriate system of governance, in which the right balance is struck between the different levels of territorial government, because within European territory, local, regional, national and EU-level governments all play a role.
5.5.1 EU mora imeti ustrezen sistem upravljanja, pri katerem so pravilno uravnotežene različne ravni institucionalnih enot, ker so na njenem ozemlju pomembne institucionalne enote na lokalni, regionalni, nacionalni in evropski ravni.
5.5.1 The European Commission identifies the fact that the introduction of the single payment has made the distribution of payments more visible.
5.5.1 Evropska komisija je ugotovila, da je z uvedbo enotnega plačila razporeditev plačil bolj pregledna.
5.5.1 The following points might, however, be raised:
5.5.1 Vendar je mogoče ugotoviti naslednje:
5.5.1 The Forum should be designed as a continuous working process.
5.5.1 Forum bi moral biti oblikovan kot stalen delovni proces.
5.5.1 The individual sub-sectors of the financial industry should not hesitate to comment on the regulation of other sectors in the interests of financial market stability.
5.5.1 Posamezne panoge naj ne hlinijo zadržanosti, ko morajo komentirati regulacijo drugih sektorjev v interesu stabilnosti finančnih trgov.
5.5.1 The new eHealth programme must aim to guarantee greater equality among European citizens as regards access to health services.
5.5.1 Cilj novega programa za e-zdravje mora biti zagotovitev večje enakosti evropskih državljanov pri dostopu do zdravstvenih storitev.
5.5.1 The proposal for a regulation stipulates that a Member State may decide to make the Common European Sales Law available for domestic contracts and/or contracts between traders, where the parties are not SMEs.
5.5.1 Predlog uredbe določa, da se lahko država članica odloči, da bo omogočila uporabo skupnega evropskega prodajnega prava za sklepanje pogodb na nacionalni ravni in/ali pogodb med trgovci, če stranke niso MSP.
5.5.1 The role of government is crucial in achieving lasting change in public health.
5.5.1 Vlada ima odločilen pomen za doseganje trajnih sprememb v javnem zdravju.
5.5.1 The role of government is crucial in achieving lasting change in public health.
5.5.1 Vlada ima odločilno vlogo pri doseganju trajnih sprememb v javnem zdravju.
5.5.1 The spread of environmental technologies is based on economic considerations but also on their technical effectiveness.
5.5.1 Uveljavljanje ekoloških tehnologij je odvisna od gospodarskih dejavnikov in tudi od njihove tehnične učinkovitosti.
5.5.1 The two first assessment criteria are clear and relate to each organisation's individual structure.
5.5.1 Prvi dve merili za ocenjevanje sta jasni in se nanašata na samo sestavo posamezne organizacije.
5.5.1 There is a serious risk of failure to benefit from the positive political attitudes to the Roma in the EU; instead, we could once again be facing a setback, which would have serious consequences.
5.5.1 Obstaja velika nevarnost, da ne bi uspeli izkoristiti pozitivnega političnega ozračja v zvezi z Romi na ravni EU in da bi ponovno prišlo do neuspeha z resnimi posledicami.
5.5.1 There is always room for further improvement, and to realise this, the Committee additionally recommends the use of long term Voluntary Agreements.
5.5.1 Vedno so možne nadaljnje izboljšave, in da bi jih dosegli, Odbor poleg tega priporoča uporabo dolgoročnih prostovoljnih sporazumov.
5.5.1 There is always room for further improvement, and to realise this, the Committee recommends in particular the use of long term Voluntary Agreements.
5.5.1 Vedno so možne nadaljnje izboljšave, kar bi po mnenju Odbora lahko dosegli zlasti z uporabo dolgoročnih prostovoljnih sporazumov.
5.5.1 Therefore, certain remaining obstacles to the Internal Market that hamper the transition to the knowledge economy must be removed as quickly as possible.
5.5.1 Zato je treba nekatere preostale ovire na notranjem trgu, ki preprečujejo prehod v ekonomijo znanja, čim prej odstraniti.
5.5.1 This option involves re-packaging in a new pared-down document only the new institutional architecture and mechanisms from the Constitutional Treaty (Foreign Affairs Minister, stable Council presidency, election of the Commission president by the European Parliament, extension of qualified majority voting and codecision, voting mechanisms, etc.).
5.5.1 V skladu s to možnostjo naj bi nov krajši dokument združeval samo novo institucionalno strukturo in mehanizme, ki so v ustavni pogodbi (minister za zunanje zadeve, stalno predsedstvo Sveta, predsednika Komisije izvoli Evropski parlament, razširitev kvalificirane večine in postopek soodločanja, sistem glasovanja itd.).
5.5.1 Urban (Article 8)
5.5.1 Mestna dimenzija (člen 8)
5.5.1 Without prejudice to maintaining high levels of security, the EESC recommends equally high levels of personal and biometric data protection, as well as the protection of "sensitive" data already covered by the EESC4.
5.5.1 Brez poseganja v ohranitev visoke ravni zaščite EESO priporoča enako visoko raven, ko gre za zaščito osebnih podatkov in biometričnih podatkov ter "občutljivih"podatkov, glede katerih je EESO že pripravil mnenje4.
5.5.1.1 If the first of these exceptions is not included in Article 19(2), the service providers could ask consumers who would like the work done quickly (kitchen improvements or a haircut at home for example) to wait at least fourteen days.
5.5.1.1 Če prva od teh izjem ne bi bila vključena v člen 19(2), bi lahko ponudniki storitev od potrošnikov, ki želijo, da bi bilo delo hitro opravljeno (na primer obnova kuhinje ali striženje las na domu), zahtevali, naj počakajo vsaj 14 dni.
5.5.1.1 Recital 38: when stating the need for the implementation of the directive to be evaluated at regular intervals, it would be preferable to give a more precise timetable;
5.5.1.1 uvodna izjava (38): bolje bi bilo natančneje določiti, v kakšnih časovnih razmakih poteka redno ocenjevanje izvajanja direktive;
5.5.1.1 The EESC proposed a separate urban programme.
5.5.1.1 Za obravnavanje mestnih območij predlaga EESO ločen program.
5.5.1.2 Recital 41: substantive changes to the earlier directive, whose transposal is mandatory, should be specified more clearly;
5.5.1.2 uvodna izjava (41): jasneje bi bilo treba opredeliti bistvene spremembe prejšnje direktive, ki jih je treba obvezno izvajati;
5.5.1.2 Recital 41: substantive changes to the earlier directive, whose transposal is mandatory, should be specified more clearly;
5.5.1.2 uvodna izjava (41): jasneje bi bilo treba opredeliti vsebinsko spremembo prejšnje direktive, ki jih je treba obvezno prenesti;
5.5.1.2 There is also provision in this particular article to permit the funding of activities within the scope of Regulation (EC) No. 1784/1999 of the European Social Fund16.
5.5.1.2 Člen predvideva tudi financiranje dejavnosti znotraj področja Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/1999 o Evropskem socialnem skladu16.
5.5.1.3 Article 2(f): the determining authority should be defined more carefully, as a number of national legal systems do not provide for the concept of a "quasi-judicial" body;
5.5.1.3 člen 2(f): organ za presojo je treba opredeliti bolj strogo, ker v več nacionalnih pravnih redih ne poznajo "parasodnih" organov;
5.5.1.4 Article 3(3): by way of example, the directive should specify any cases where it might be applied to requests for protection that go beyond its scope (see the comments made on the new environmental refugee phenomenon);
5.5.1.4 člen 3(3): med drugim bi bilo treba navesti vse primere uporabe te direktive, za primer prošnje za zaščito, ki ne sodi v področje uporabe direktive (glej opombo v zvezi z novim pojavom "okoljskih beguncev");
5.5.1.5 Article 6: the provision allowing Member States to require that applications be made in a designated place does not appear to be in line with the subsequent provisions of Article 7, and seems restrictive given the prior objective of providing broader access to the procedure;
5.5.1.5 člen 6: določba, ki daje državam članicam možnost, da zahtevajo, da so vložene na določenem mestu, se zdi neusklajena z določbami, ki sledijo v členu 7, in omejevalna glede na želeno in že predvideno boljšo dostopnost postopka;
5.5.1.6 Article 10(13)*: in all cases of negative decisions, the person concerned and his or her legal representatives must be informed in his or her own language, not only of the reason for the rejection of the request, but also of the (reasonable and acceptable) time frames, arrangements and procedures for opposing the decision and lodging an appeal;
5.5.1.6 člen 10(13)*: o vseh negativnih odločitvah je treba obvestiti prizadetega – v njegovem materinem jeziku – in njegove zakonite zastopnike, in sicer ne samo o razlogih za zavrnitev prošnje, temveč tudi o rokih (razumnih in sprejemljivih), načinih in postopkih za ugovor in pritožbo;
5.5.1.6 Article 10(13)*: in all cases of negative decisions, the person concerned and his or her legal representatives must be informed in his or her own language, not only of the reason for the rejection of the request, but also of the (reasonable and acceptable) time frames, arrangements and procedures for opposing the decision and lodging an appeal;
5.5.1.6 člen 10(13)*: o vseh negativnih odločitvah je treba obvestiti prizadetega – v njegovem materinem jeziku – in njegove zakonite zastopnike, in sicer ne samo o razlogih za zavrnitev vloge, temveč tudi o rokih (razumnih in sprejemljivih), načinih in postopkih za ugovor in pritožbo;
5.5.1.7 Article 12(19)(d)**: allowing the competent authorities to search the applicants and their personal effects may run counter to constitutional guarantees provided for in the legislation of the various Member States;
5.5.1.7 člen 12(19)(d)**: možnost, dana pristojnim organom, da preiščejo prosilca in predmete, ki jih ima pri sebi, bi bila lahko v nasprotju z ustavnimi jamstvi, ki jih predvidevajo ureditve posameznih držav članic;
5.5.1.9 Food for thought on this may be provided by EU Court of Justice judgement C-133/06 of 6 May 2008, which annulled Articles 29(1) and (2) and 36(3) of the Asylum Procedures Directive (2005/85/EC).
5.5.1.9 Spodbude k razmisleku bi bilo v zvezi s tem mogoče najti v sodbi Sodišča EU v zadevi C-133/06 z dne 6. maja 2008, s katero sta bila razveljavljena člena 29(1) in (2) ter 36(3) direktive o postopku 2005/85/ES.
5.5.1.9 Food for thought on this may be provided by EU Court of Justice judgement C-133/06 of 6 May 2008, which annulled Articles 29(1) and (2) and 36(3) of the Asylum Procedures Directive (2005/85/EC).
5.5.1.9 spodbudo k razmisleku bi bilo v zvezi s tem mogoče najti v sodbi Sodišča EU v zadevi C-133/06 z dne 6. maja 2008, s katero sta bila razveljavljena člena 29(1) in (2) ter 36(3) direktive o azilnih postopkih 2005/85/ES.
5.5.10 At the same time all the players involved (government, business, trade unions and volunteer organisations) must work together if volunteering is to be promoted and encouraged and its recognition in society enhanced.
5.5.10 Vsi udeleženi akterji (država, sindikati, podjetja in organizacije prostovoljnega dela) morajo tesno sodelovati, če želijo spodbujati in pospeševati prostovoljno delo ter povečati njegovo priznanje v družbi.
5.5.10 Pricing negotiations are out of kilter, with farmers facing what they see as unfair contractual practices as a result of food wholesalers' superior bargaining position.
5.5.10 Pri oblikovanju cen nastaja neravnovesje pogajalskih stališč, saj kmetje govorijo o nepravični pogodbeni praksi, katere vzrok je premoč pogajalskih stališč večjih trgovcev z živili.
5.5.10 The EESC welcomes:
5.5.10 EESO pozdravlja:
5.5.11 In line with free-market thinking, the market alone currently determines the key issue of who gets what share of the value chain.
5.5.11 Odločilno vprašanje, kdo ima kakšen delež v verigi ustvarjanja vrednosti, trenutno – čisto v smislu prostega trga – rešuje trg sam.
5.5.12 Since 77% of the EU-27 food market is already controlled by just fifteen commercial chains, the Committee feels that, as is currently happening in the USA, consideration should be given to whether competition law is enough to prevent the emergence of market dominance and questionable contractual practices.
5.5.12 Ker v EU-27 le 15 trgovinskih verig obvladuje 77 % trga z živili, se EESO zavzema, da bi se na podoben način kot sedaj v ZDA preverjalo, ali konkurenčno pravo zadostuje za preprečevanje prevladujočih struktur na trgu in sporne pogodbene prakse.
5.5.13 The Committee expects the Commission to act to make pricing more transparent and to put forward solutions to avoid the phenomenon known as "asymmetrical pricing"2.
5.5.13 EESO pričakuje, da si bo Komisija prizadevala za preglednost oblikovanja cen in predlagala rešitve za preprečevanje t.
5.5.14 The large food retail chains and major processors demand ever more uniform, virtually standardised, cheap primary products.
5.5.14 Velike verige živil in glavni predelovalci zahtevajo vedno več enakih, skoraj normiranih, cenenih surovin.
5.5.15 In fact, however, the production and marketing of premium products to reflect the specific traits of a particular region and the diversity of rural areas in the EU is a key task in maintaining the European agricultural model.
5.5.15 Toda prav proizvodnja in trženje kakovostnih proizvodov kot izraz regionalnosti in raznolikosti podeželskih območij v EU je pomembna dejavnost za vzdrževanje evropskega modela kmetijstva.
5.5.16 Much greater attention needs to be paid to geographic indications and differences in production techniques than has been the case in the past.
5.5.16 Mnogo bolj kot doslej je treba upoštevati geografske podatke in proizvodnotehnične diferenciacije.
5.5.17 Product labelling is at present exposed to many misleading and dubious practices.
5.5.17 Pri označevanju proizvodov trenutno obstaja zavajajoča in dvomljiva praksa.
5.5.18 Market transparency and consumer information (such as origin labelling) need to be improved and monitored.
5.5.18 Preglednost trga in informacije za potrošnike (kot je oznaka izvora) je treba izboljšati in jih spremljati.
5.5.19 In future, tax revenue should be invested primarily in strengthening regional products and markets.
5.5.19 Prihodke od davkov bi bilo treba v prihodnje vlagati predvsem v krepitev regionalnih proizvodov in trgov.
5.5.2 "Investments of businesses and other stakeholders in learning, innovation and research should be facilitated, including by state aid regimes and public procurement and within the framework of competition rules."
5.5.2 Naložbe podjetij v učenje, inovacije in raziskave bi bilo treba olajšati, in sicer vključno s pomočjo ureditev državne pomoči in javnih naročil ter v okviru pravil o konkurenci.
5.5.2 A considerable number of countries have recently launched structured deliberative processes involving civil society (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States and Switzerland).
5.5.2 Večja skupina držav je pred kratkim začela izvajati strukturirane procese odločanja, ki vključujejo sodelovanje civilne družbe (Avstralija, Kanada, Francija, Nemčija, Irska, Italija, Luksemburg, Mehika, Nizozemska, Združeno kraljestvo, ZDA in Švica).
5.5.2 Alternative technologies should be used more widely in energy applications, particularly following the approach of increasing the range of alternatives to using primary fuels in electricity production; this can be achieved by replacing fuel oil, where technically, environmentally and financially feasible, with natural gas especially, coal (there seem to be good prospects for "clean" use of coal) and nuclear fuel (latest-generation technology here, too).
5.5.2 Pri energetskih aplikacijah je treba v večjem obsegu uporabljati alternativne tehnologije, zlasti s širjenjem možnosti za uporabo primarnih goriv pri proizvodnji električne energije; to je mogoče doseči tako, da se, kjer je to tehnično, okoljsko in finančno izvedljivo, kurilno olje nadomesti zlasti z zemeljskim plinom, premogom (zdi se, da je veliko možnosti za "čisto" uporabo premoga) in jedrskim gorivom (tudi v tem primeru proizvedenim s tehnologijami zadnje generacije).
5.5.2 Alternative technologies should be used more widely in energy applications, particularly following the approach of increasing the range of alternatives to using primary fuels in electricity production; this can be achieved by replacing fuel oil, where technically, environmentally and financially feasible, with natural gas especially, coal (there seem to be good prospects for "clean" use of coal) and nuclear fuel (latest-generation technology here, too).
5.5.2 Pri uporabi energije je treba v večjem obsegu uporabljati alternativne tehnologije, zlasti s širjenjem možnosti za uporabo primarnih goriv pri proizvodnji električne energije; to je mogoče doseči tako, da se, kjer je to tehnično, okoljsko in finančno izvedljivo, kurilno olje nadomesti zlasti z zemeljskim plinom, premogom (možnosti za "čisto" uporabo premoga se zdijo obetavne) in jedrskim gorivom (tudi v tem primeru proizvedenim s tehnologijami zadnje generacije).
5.5.2 An analysis of NRISs shows that there are worrying discrepancies between, on the one hand, the declared political will to overcome discrimination and social exclusion of the Roma, and on the other the effectiveness of the instruments, resources and mechanisms put in place.
5.5.2 Analiza NRIS kaže, da obstajajo zaskrbljujoče razlike med razglašeno politično voljo za odpravo diskriminacije Romov in njihove socialne izključenosti ter učinkovitostjo predvidenih instrumentov, virov in mehanizmov.
5.5.2 Any decision regarding the revision of transitional arrangements should be taken at Member State level and be backed up by analyses founded on facts.
5.5.2 Vsaka odločitev za spremembo prehodnih obdobij mora biti sprejeta na nacionalni ravni in podprta z analizo, ki temelji na dejstvih.
5.5.2 Approach No 2: Partial substitution of Stability Bond issuance for national issuance, with joint and several guarantees
5.5.2 Pristop št. 2: delna nadomestitev državnih obveznic s stabilnostnimi obveznicami s solidarnim jamstvom
5.5.2 Approach No. 2: Partial substitution of Stability Bond issuance for national issuance, with joint and several guarantees
5.5.2 Pristop št. 2: delna nadomestitev državnih obveznic s stabilnostnimi obveznicami s solidarnim jamstvom
5.5.2 Banking institutions have not been risk averse when investing in hedge funds and other securities and yet seem to have rediscovered risk aversion when it comes to their basic job of providing funds for the real economy.
5.5.2 Banke se pri vlaganju v hedge sklade in druge finančne produkte niso ustrašile nobenega tveganja, zdi pa se, da so spet odkrile strah pred njim, ko gre za njihovo poglavitno nalogo, zagotavljanje sredstev za realno gospodarstvo.