natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4.1 The Committee has always "support[ed] the move towards more auctioning of allowances.
4.1 EESO je vedno podpiral večjo prodajo pravic na dražbi.
4.1 The Committee has always welcomed moves to boost the innovation capacity of the EU and the Member States, advocating an integrated approach to the knowledge triangle, particularly linking the academic world and enterprise.
4.1 Odbor je vedno pozitivno ocenjeval ukrepe za krepitev sposobnosti EU in držav članic za inovacije ter podpiral celostni pristop k trikotniku znanja, zlasti povezovanje univerz in gospodarstva.
4.1 The Committee has divided its comments into two categories:
4.1 Odbor je svoje ugotovitve razdelil na dva dela:
4.1 The Committee has long experience in reaching out to civil society organisations from all sectors and creating value through dialogue and concrete action with European policymakers.
4.1 Odbor ima dolgoletne izkušnje z navezovanjem stikov z organizacijami civilne družbe iz vseh sektorjev ter ustvarjanjem vrednosti z dialogom in konkretnimi ukrepi z evropskimi oblikovalci politike.
4.1 The Committee has regularly given its opinion on the safety and role of nuclear power in the EU's energy mix2.
4.1 Odbor redno podaja mnenje o varnosti in vlogi jedrske energije v mešanici energijskih virov EU2.
4.1 The Committee has regularly given its opinion on the safety and role of nuclear power in the EU's energy mix8.
4.1 Odbor redno podaja mnenje o varnosti in vlogi jedrske energije v mešanici energijskih virov EU8.
4.1 The Committee has spoken out on a number of occasions on the need to make significant and sustainable energy savings by developing low-consumption techniques, products and services, and on the need to change people's behaviour so as to reduce energy consumption while nevertheless maintaining the same quality of life.
4.1 Odbor je večkrat poudaril potrebo po znatnem in trajnostnem varčevanju z energijo z razvojem tehnik, proizvodov in storitev z nizko porabo energije ter da je treba spremeniti vedenje ljudi, da bi zmanjšali porabo energije, hkrati pa ohranili enako kakovost življenja.
4.1 The Committee has spoken out on a number of occasions on the need to make significant and sustainable energy savings by developing low-consumption techniques, products and services, and on the need to change people's behaviour so as to reduce energy consumption while nevertheless maintaining the same quality of life.
4.1 Odbor je večkrat poudaril potrebo po znatnem in trajnostnem varčevanju z energijo z razvojem tehnik, proizvodov in storitev z nizko porabo energije ter to, da je treba spremeniti vedenje ljudi, da bi zmanjšali porabo energije, hkrati pa ohranili enako kakovost življenja.
4.1 The Committee identifies a number of specific priorities under each of the five strategic priority areas.
4.1 Odbor za vsako od petih strateško najpomembnejših področij opredeli številne konkretne prednostne naloge.
4.1 The Committee identifies a number of specific priorities under each of the five strategic priority areas.
4.1 Odbor za vsako od petih strateško najpomembnejših področij opredeli številne posebne prednostne naloge.
4.1 The Committee is a firm advocate of using inland waterways capacity more effectively, especially in view of the huge advantages this mode of transport offers in relation to transport volumes, sustainability and external costs.
4.1 Odbor je velik zagovornik boljšega izkoriščanja zmogljivosti prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh, zlasti glede na izjemne prednosti, ki jih ponuja ta način prevoza na področju učinkovitosti prevoza, trajnosti in zunanjih stroškov.
4.1 The Committee is firmly convinced that the various forms of R&I partnerships are a formula for excellence with regard to development and a powerful tool to address the main issues affecting the EU's competitiveness.
4.1 EESO je trdno prepričan, da so partnerstva na področju raziskav in inovacij v vseh oblikah odličen način za razvoj in učinkovit instrument za reševanje glavnih vprašanj, ki vplivajo na konkurenčnost EU.
4.1 The Committee is in favour of developing and strengthening cooperation between business registers across all EU Member States with a view to facilitating access to official, reliable information on businesses and companies and ensuring transparency in the single market, while enhancing the protection of shareholders and third parties (creditors, business partners, consumers, etc.), particularly in cross-border procedures (such as cross-border mergers, seat transfers or insolvency proceedings).
4.1 Odbor podpira razvoj in krepitev sodelovanja med poslovnimi registri v vseh državah članicah EU, da bi olajšali dostop do uradnih, zanesljivih informacij o podjetjih in družbah, zagotovili preglednost enotnega trga, hkrati pa izboljšali zaščito zainteresiranih in tretjih strani (upnikov, poslovnih partnerjev, potrošnikov itd.), zlasti v čezmejnih postopkih (kot so čezmejne združitve, prenosi sedeža ali postopki v primeru insolventnosti).
4.1 The Committee is in favour of developing and strengthening cooperation between business registers across all EU Member States with a view to facilitating access to official, reliable information on companies and ensuring transparency in the single market, while enhancing the protection of shareholders and third parties (creditors, business partners, consumers, etc.), particularly in cross-border procedures (such as cross-border mergers, seat transfers or insolvency proceedings).
4.1 Odbor podpira razvoj in krepitev sodelovanja med poslovnimi registri v vseh državah članicah EU, da bi olajšali dostop do uradnih, zanesljivih informacij o podjetjih, zagotovili preglednost enotnega trga, hkrati pa izboljšali zaščito zainteresiranih in tretjih strani (upnikov, poslovnih partnerjev, potrošnikov itd.), zlasti v čezmejnih postopkih (kot so čezmejne združitve, prenosi sedeža ali postopki v primeru insolventnosti).
4.1 The Committee is in favour of improving cooperation between the EU agencies and with the national coastguard bodies, which should result in cost-efficient and cost-effective surveillance of the EU's external maritime borders.
4.1 EESO se zavzema za tesnejše sodelovanje med agencijami EU in nacionalnimi organi obalne straže, kar naj bi privedlo do cenejšega in stroškovno učinkovitejšega nadzora zunanjih morskih meja EU.
4.1 The Committee is strongly in favour of removing barriers to the smooth operation of the internal market, not least with regard to maritime transport, which, as the Commission says in the communication, is vitally important to the EU.
4.1 Odbor odločno podpira odpravljanje ovir, ki otežujejo dobro delovanje notranjega trga, zlasti v pomorskem sektorju, ki je – kot je navedla tudi Komisija v svojem sporočilu – za Unijo ključnega pomena.
4.1 The Committee is strongly in favour of removing barriers to the smooth operation of the internal market, not least with regard to the enormous passenger transport market.
4.1 Odbor odločno podpira odpravljanje ovir, ki otežujejo dobro delovanje notranjega trga, zlasti kar zadeva izjemno velik trg potniškega prometa.
4.1 The Committee is unhappy with the title of the communication, which is confusing and promises more than the content delivers.
4.1 Odbor izraža razočaranje nad naslovom sporočila, ki je zavajajoč in vsebinsko obljublja več, kot ponuja.
4.1 The Committee notes that a high-level group of experts and a task force have been set up to establish an innovation partnership strategy on water.
4.1 Odbor se je seznanil z ustanovitvijo skupine strokovnjakov na visoki ravni in delovne skupine, ki naj bi oblikovali strategijo partnerstva za inovacije v zvezi vodo.
4.1 The Committee notes that in three places, the Commission communication points to the importance and the role of the social partners and of organised civil society.
4.1 EESO ugotavlja, da Komisija v treh točkah poudarja pomen in vlogo socialnih partnerjev in organizirane civilne družbe.
4.1 The Committee notes that the Commission has been pursuing its work energetically since 2006.
4.1 Odbor meni, da je bila Komisija od leta 2006 zelo dejavna.
4.1 The Committee notes that the Commission has been taking action since 2006.
4.1 Odbor meni, da je bila Komisija od leta 2006 dejavna.
4.1 The Committee notes that the definitions of "seasonal worker" and "activity dependent on the passing of the seasons" are wide in scope, leaving it up to the Member States to decide which specific sectors are to be considered season-dependent.
4.1 Odbor opozarja, da sta izbrani opredelitvi "sezonski delavec" in "dejavnost, odvisna od menjavanja letnih časov" široki in je tako prepuščeno državam članicam, da opredelijo, katere panoge so odvisne od menjavanja letnih časov.
4.1 The Committee notes that the most recent scientific analysis on the dangers of ionising radiation has been used in the preparation of this directive and welcomes the approach taken to address, define and extend the health protection needs of people and the environment.
4.1 Odbor ugotavlja, da je bila ta direktiva pripravljena na podlagi najnovejših znanstvenih analiz o nevarnosti ionizirajočega sevanja, ter odobrava pristop, v skladu s katerim se obravnavajo, opredeljujejo in širijo potrebe glede varstva zdravja ljudi in okolja.
4.1 The Committee notes the process by which the nuclear safety assistance and cooperation programmes have developed over the last 20 years.
4.1 Odbor je seznanjen z razvojem programov za pomoč na področju jedrske varnosti in sodelovanja v zadnjih 20 letih.
4.1 The Committee points out that the Commission's proposal does not resolve the problem facing producers of red fruit for processing.
4.1 Odbor opozarja na dejstvo, da sedanji predlog Komisije ne odpravlja težav proizvajalcev rdečega sadja, namenjenega predelavi.
4.1 The Committee points out that the method used by the Commission to identify EU areas eligible for regional exemptions under Article 107(3) gives priority to the regions with the most serious problems (subparagraph a), identified on the basis of GDP/PPS compared to the overall European average.
4.1 EESO opozarja, da način, ki ga uporablja Komisija za ugotavljanje, katera območja v EU so upravičena do regionalnih izvzetij po členu 107(3), daje prednost regijam z najhujšimi problemi (pododstavek (a)), če upoštevamo BDP glede na standard kupne moči v primerjavi z evropskim povprečjem.
4.1 The Committee questions the removal from Subsection 1 ("Calls for proposals") of the provision relating to the possible prior issue of calls for expressions of interest, to enable a measure's objectives and justification to be accurately pinpointed and assessed.
4.1 Odbor sprašuje, zakaj je bila iz pododdelka 1 (Razpisi za zbiranje predlogov) oddelka 2 odpravljena določba, v skladu s katero pred tem razpisom lahko poteka razpis za prijavo interesa, ki omogoča, da se cilji in zahteve ukrepov točno določijo in ocenijo.
4.1 The Committee recalls its previous recommendations to the Commission (in the context of communication): those set out in the annex to its October 2005 opinion on "The Reflection Period: structure, themes and framework for an evaluation of the debate on the European Union" (CESE 1249/2005); its December 2005 opinion on the Commission's contribution to the reflection and beyond: Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate (CESE 1499/2005); and its July 2006 opinion on the White Paper on a European communication policy (CESE 972/2006).
4.1 Odbor opozarja na svoja prejšnja priporočila Komisiji na področju komuniciranja, zlasti na priporočila: iz priloge k mnenju iz oktobra 2005 o obdobju za razmislek – potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji (CESE 1249/2005), iz mnenja iz decembra 2005 o prispevku Komisije k obdobju razmisleka in za vnaprej – Načrt D za demokracijo, dialog in debato (CESE 1499/2005) ter iz mnenja iz julija 2006 o Beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki (CESE 972/2006).
4.1 The Committee recalls its previous recommendations to the Commission in the communication context, particularly those set out in the annex to its opinion on The Reflection Period: structure, themes and framework for an evaluation of the debate on the European Union (CESE 1249/20055) and its May opinion addressed to the 15-16 June 2006 European Council.
4.1 Odbor opozarja na svoja prejšnja priporočila Komisiji na področju komuniciranja, zlasti na tista v prilogi k mnenju o obdobju za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji (CESE 1249/20055) ter v majskem mnenju, predloženem Evropskemu svetu 15. in 16. junija 2006.
4.1 The Committee recalls its previous recommendations to the Commission in the context of communications: those set out in the appendix to its October 2005 opinion on The Reflection Period: structure, themes and framework for an evaluation of the debate on the European Union (CESE 1249/20054), its December 2005 opinion on The Commission’s contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate (CESE 1499/20055), its July 2006 opinion on The White Paper on a European communication policy (CESE 972/20066) and the opinion adopted in April 2008 on Communicating Europe in Partnership (CESE 774/2008).
4.1 Odbor opozarja na svoja prejšnja priporočila Komisiji na področju komuniciranja, zlasti na priporočila: iz priloge k mnenju iz oktobra 2005 o obdobju za razmislek – potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji (CESE 1249/20054), iz mnenja iz decembra 2005 o prispevku Komisije k obdobju razmisleka in za vnaprej – Načrt D za demokracijo, dialog in debato (CESE 1499/20055), iz mnenja iz julija 2006 o Beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki (CESE 972/20066) ter iz mnenja, ki ga bo Odbor sprejel aprila 2008 o partnerstvu za komuniciranje o Evropi " (CESE 774/2008 fin).
4.1 The Committee recalls its previous recommendations to the Commission in the context of communications: those set out in the appendix to its October 2005 opinion on The Reflection Period: structure, themes and framework for an evaluation of the debate on the European Union (CESE 1249/20054), its December 2005 opinion on The Commission’s contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate (CESE 1499/20055), its July 2006 opinion on The White Paper on a European communication policy (CESE 972/20066) and the opinion adopted in April 2008 on Communicating Europe in Partnership (CESE 774/2008).
4.1 Odbor opozarja na svoja prejšnja priporočila Komisiji na področju komuniciranja, zlasti na priporočila v prilogi k mnenju iz oktobra 2005 o obdobju za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji (CESE 1249/20054), v mnenju iz decembra 2005 o prispevku Komisije k obdobju razmisleka in za vnaprej: Načrt D za demokracijo, dialog in debato (CESE 1499/20055), v mnenju iz julija 2006 o beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki (CESE 972/20066) ter v mnenju, ki ga je Odbor sprejel aprila 2008 o partnerstvu za komuniciranje o Evropi (CESE 774/2008 fin).
4.1 The Committee recognises and applauds Croatia's efforts to continue the accession negotiations without delay and believes that the environment is favourable to this pace being kept up throughout the campaigning for the elections in Autumn 2007.
4.1 Odbor priznava in ceni prizadevanja Hrvaške za hiter napredek pristopnih pogajanj in meni, da obstajajo dobri pogoji za to, da volilne kampanje pred volitvami jeseni 2007 te dinamike ne bodo prekinile.
4.1 The Committee recognises that security policy is vitally important to the citizens of the Union.
4.1 Odbor priznava, da je varnostna politika bistvenega pomena za državljane Unije.
4.1 The Committee regrets not having being consulted by the Council, particularly considering the remit of the Consultative Commission on Industrial Change (CCMI), which was incorporated into the Committee as a permanent working structure and took on the role of the European Coal and Steel Committee (ECSC) Consultative Committee.
4.1 EESO obžaluje, da se Svet z njim ni posvetoval, zlasti zaradi kompetenc posvetovalne komisije za spremembe v industriji (CCMI), ki je stalna delovna struktura znotraj EESO in je prevzela naloge Posvetovalnega odbora ESPJ.
4.1 The Committee regrets that, despite the obviously interconnected nature of the above-mentioned dossiers and their importance both for authorities and for the women and men who serve them, they were presented by the Commission over the course of 2006 in no particular order, even though they deal with issues that are neither urgent nor entirely new, but are all interlinked.
4.1 Odbor obžaluje, da so bili zgoraj omenjeni dosjeji kljub temu, da so med sabo očitno povezani in da so pomembni tako za upravo kot za ženske in moške, zaposlene v upravi, Komisiji v letu 2006 predloženi neenotno, čeprav obravnavajo vprašanja, ki niso niti nujna niti popolnoma nova, ampak v celoti povezana.
4.1 The Committee restates its full support for Community strategies in favour of sustainable development, including the voluntary SAICM framework8, and highlights the need for a preventive approach to chemicals management in order to guard against any harmful effects for human health and the environment, as it previously pointed out several times9 in its contribution to the introduction of the REACH legislation.
4.1 Odbor ponovno izraža popolno podporo strategijam Skupnosti za trajnostni razvoj, vključno s prostovoljnim okvirom SAICM8, ter poudarja potrebo po preventivnem pristopu k ravnanju s kemikalijami, da bi preprečili škodljive posledice za zdravje ljudi in okolje, kot je že večkrat9 poudaril v svojem prispevku k uvedbi zakonodaje REACH.
4.1 The Committee sees the European Commission's initiative for a European Energy Union as akin to the earlier idea of a European Energy Community, and consequently endorses this initiative.
4.1 Odboru se zdi pobuda Evropske komisije za evropsko energetsko unijo sorodna predhodni zamisli o evropski energetski skupnosti in jo zato podpira.
4.1 The Committee shares the Commission's view that accurate and comprehensive monitoring and reporting of emissions and other climate change data is absolutely essential to effective implementation of international obligations under the UNFCCC and to building trust and confidence among countries around the world that all are playing their fair part in tackling climate change.
4.1 Odbor se strinja s Komisijo, da je natančno in celovito spremljanje emisij in poročanje o njih ter drugih podnebnih spremembah nujno za učinkovito izvajanje mednarodnih obveznosti v okviru UNFCCC in krepitev vzajemnega zaupanja med državami po vsem svetu, ki prispevajo k boju proti podnebnim spremembam.
4.1 The Committee shares the opinion that interoperability, which is crucial to free competition, can only be achieved when consumers are able to use whatever device they choose to read their content.
4.1 Odbor se strinja, da je interoperabilnost, ki je bistvenega pomena za prosto konkurenco, mogoče doseči le, če uporabniki za branje vsebin lahko uporabljajo katero koli želeno napravo.
4.1 The Committee stresses the clarification achieved by grouping the 26 measures for rural development into three distinct axes.
4.1 Odbor poudarja prizadevanje za jasnost, ki se kaže v porazdelitvi 26 ukrepov za razvoj podeželja v tri različne prednostne cilje.
4.1 The Committee strongly advocates a Community initiative on the development of "socially responsible regions" (SRRs) combining the objectives of grassroots democracy; strengthening of a widespread participatory, innovative culture; effective regional governance which is consistent with the national and Community Lisbon agenda frameworks; and a multi-partner, multi-sector partnership which can enhance the appeal and competitiveness of the region on the international market, anticipating industrial change and enhancing local social capital.
4.1 Odbor odločno zagovarja pobudo Skupnosti za razvoj "družbeno odgovornih regij", združeno s cilji neposredne demokracije; krepitev splošno razširjene participativne, inovativne kulture; učinkovito regionalno upravljanje, skladno z nacionalnimi okviri in okvirom lizbonske agende Skupnosti; ter partnerstvo več strani in več sektorjev, ki lahko poveča privlačnost in konkurenčnost regije na mednarodnem trgu ter tako predvidi spremembe v industriji in izboljša lokalni družbeni kapital.
4.1 The Committee strongly advocates a Community initiative on the development of "socially responsible regions" (SRRs) combining the objectives of grassroots democracy; strengthening of a widespread participatory, innovative culture; effective regional governance which is consistent with the national and Community Lisbon agenda frameworks; and a multi-partner, multi-sector partnership which can enhance the appeal and competitiveness of the region on the international market, anticipating industrial change and enhancing local social capital.
4.1 Odbor odločno zagovarja pobudo Skupnosti za razvoj "družbeno odgovornih regij", združeno s cilji neposredne demokracije; krepitev splošno razširjene participativne, inovativne kulture; učinkovito regionalno upravljanje, skladno z nacionalnimi okviri in okvirom lizbonske agende Skupnosti; ter partnerstvo, v katerega je udeleženih več strani in več sektorjev, ki lahko poveča privlačnost in konkurenčnost regije na mednarodnem trgu ter tako predvidi spremembe v industriji in izboljša lokalni družbeni kapital.
4.1 The Committee strongly supports the objective of making Europe a leader in global efforts to reduce releases and emissions of mercury to the environment by restricting production and consumption of mercury, and encouraging substitution by other safer materials, processes and products.
4.1 Odbor v celoti podpira cilj, da Evropa z omejevanjem proizvodnje in porabe živega srebra ter spodbujanjem nadomeščanja živega srebra z drugimi bolj varnimi snovmi, postopki in izdelki prevzame vodilno vlogo na svetovni ravni pri prizadevanjih za zmanjšanje izpustov in emisij živega srebra v okolje.
4.1 The Committee strongly wishes to be consulted on the report that the Commission will be drawing up in 2010 on progress made with the Action Plan and any problems encountered in implementing it.
4.1 Odbor meni, da mora izraziti svoje mnenje o poročilu, ki ga bo Komisija pripravila leta 2010 o napredku akcijskega načrta in morebitnih težavah, ki bi se pojavile pri njegovem izvajanju.
4.1 The Committee suggests that the competent EU services re-evaluate their functions where these directly concern the application of the fundamental rights of the Roma and of minority rights and do not involve the open method of coordination, particularly where the above-mentioned issues are concerned.
4.1 Odbor predlaga pristojnim službam Evropske unije, da ponovno ocenijo svoje naloge, ki so neposredno vezane na izvajanje temeljnih pravic Romov in pravic manjšin ter niso predmet odprte metode usklajevanja, zlasti z vidika prej navedenih vprašanj.
4.1 The Committee supported5 the Commission's first proposal for implementing an open method of coordination for integration6; the proposal was not, however, accepted by the Council in 2003.
4.1 Odbor je podprl5 prvi predlog Komisije o uporabi odprte metode koordinacije na področju vključevanja6, ki pa ga Svet leta 2003 ni sprejel.
4.1 The Committee supports the aims of the Commission's proposal, as a fast, efficient and inclusive European standardisation process represents not only a key pillar in the architecture of the single market, which is the fulcrum of European integration and the Europe 2020 strategy that seeks to achieve it, but also and above all one of the foundations of Europe's economic competitiveness and a driving force for innovation.
4.1 Odbor podpira cilje predloga Komisije, saj hiter, učinkovit in participativen evropski postopek standardizacije ni samo nosilen element pri oblikovanju enotnega trga, ki je v središču evropskega povezovanja in njegovemu uresničevanju namenjene strategije Evropa 2020, temveč je tudi in predvsem eden od temeljev konkurenčnosti evropskega gospodarstva in eno od gonil inovativnosti.