natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Figure 3: Ownership distribution of installed RE capacity for power production in Germany (2012).
Slika3: Lastništvo nameščenih zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov v Nemčiji (2012).
Figure 3: Participation in the joint actions
Slika 3: Udeležba v skupnih ukrepih
Figure 3: Progress in Implementation since 2001 for electricity networks.
Slika 3: Napredek pri izvajanju od leta 2001 za elektroenergetska omrežja.
Figure 3: Reasons for not buying online (% of individuals who have not ordered online in 2009)
Slika 3: Razlogi proti spletnim nakupom (% posameznikov, ki v letu 2009 niso naročali na spletu)
Figure 3: Selection of the correct system boundaries in case of auxiliary/stand by boilers (GT: Gas Turbine; G: Generator; FB: Fuel Boiler; HRB: Heat Recovery Boiler)
Slika 3 Izbira pravilnih mej sistema v primeru dodatnih/nadomestnih kotlov (PT: plinska turbina; G: generator; KG: Kotel na gorivo; KRT: kotli z rekuperacijo toplote)
Figure 3: Share of people aged 0-59 living in a jobless household12 by country; 2008
Slika 3: Delež ljudi v starosti 0–59, ki živijo v brezposelnih gospodinjstvih12, po državah leta 2008
Figure 3: Share of young people not in employment, education or training, as a percentage of the age group 15-24 in 2008 and 2010
Slika 3: Delež mladih, ki niso zaposleni in se niti ne izobražujejo niti usposabljajo, kot odstotek v starostni skupini 15–24 let leta 2008 in leta 2010
Figure 3: Soil erosion by water in the EU (t/ha/y).
Slika 3: Erozija tal zaradi vode v EU (t/ha/l)
Figure 3: Time needed to resolve administrative cases* (1st instance/in days) (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 3: Čas, potreben za reševanje upravnih zadev* (prva stopnja/v dneh) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 3: Trends in rail freight transport 2000-2007
Slika 3: Razvoj železniškega tovornega prometa 2000–2007
Figure 3: Trends in rail freight transport performance in EU-25, EU-15 and EU-10 (1970-2005)
Slika 3: Gibanja v učinku železniškega prevoza tovora v EU-25, EU-15 in EU-10 (1970–2005)
Figure 3: Two-step procedure to compile the Resource Use and Emissions Profile
Slika 3: Dvofazni postopek za pripravo profila rabe virov in emisij
Figure 3: Two-step procedure to compile the Resource Use and Emissions Profile (the screening step is highly recommended, but not mandatory).
Slika 3: Dvofazni postopek za pripravo profila rabe virov in emisij (presejalni pregled je zelo priporočljiv, ni pa obvezen)
Figure 3: Unemployment rate and yearly change, as reported in the scoreboard of key   employment and social indicators
Slika 3: Stopnja brezposelnosti in letna sprememba, kot sta razvidni iz pregleda ključnih zaposlitvenih in socialnih kazalnikov
Figure 3a
Slika 3a
Figure 3b
Slika 3b
Figure 3c
Slika 3c
Figure 3d
Slika 3d
Figure 4 (Source: BEREC)
Graf 4 (Vir: BEREC)
Figure 4 - Differences in student performance in science, by immigrant status and country
Slika 4: Razlike v rezultatih učencev pri naravoslovju po priseljenskem statusu in državi
Figure 4 Crawfish
Slika 4 Rarog
Figure 4 focuses on the data collection step to be taken when developing an OEF study.
Slika 4 prikazuje zlasti fazo zbiranja podatkov, ki jo je treba izvesti pri pripravi študije okoljskega odtisa organizacij.
Figure 4 Shared biometric matching service
Slika 4 Skupna storitev za ugotavljanje ujemanja biometričnih podatkov
Figure 4 shows the evolution of gross electricity generation by source according to the PRIMES Reference scenario for the 2010-2030 period:
Slika 4 kaže razvoj bruto proizvodnje električne energije po virih glede na referenčni scenarij PRIMES za obdobje 2010–2030:
Figure 4 shows the switching rates and reported net price changes for selected markets11.
Graf 4 prikazuje stopnje zamenjave ponudnika in prijavljene neto spremembe cene za izbrane trge11.
Figure 4, produced by the JRC in preparation for the World Atlas of Desertification34, shows the areas where productive capacity has been constantly decreasing in the past few decades.
Na sliki 4, ki jo je pripravilo JRC za svetovni atlas dezertifikacije34, so prikazana območja, na katerih se je proizvodna zmogljivost v zadnjih nekaj desetletjih stalno zmanjševala.
Figure 4.
Diagram 4.
Figure 4.2 shows progress made by each Member State over the 2000-2006 period (grey) against progress still to be made to reach its own target (blue).
Slika 4.2 prikazuje napredek posameznih držav članic v obdobju 2000–2006 (sivo) v primerjavi z razvojem, ki je še potreben za doseganje nacionalnih ciljev (modro).
Figure 40 also includes probation systems and legal aid.
3.1.1 Trajanje postopkov
Figure 40: Topics of surveys conducted among court users or legal professionals* (source: European Commission62)
Slika 40: Teme raziskav, izvedenih med uporabniki sodišč ali pravnimi strokovnjaki* (vir: Evropska komisija62)
Figure 412
Slika 412
Figure 41: Follow-up of surveys conducted among court users or legal professionals (source: European Commission63)
Slika 41: Spremljanje raziskav, izvedenih med uporabniki sodišč ali pravnimi strokovnjaki (vir: Evropska komisija63)
Figure 42: Defined standards on aspects related to the justice system* (source: European Commission66)
Slika 42: Opredeljeni standardi za vidike, povezane s pravosodnim sistemom* (vir: Evropska komisija66)
Figure 42: Number of lawyers* (per 100.000 inhabitants) (source: CEPEJ study)
(prva stopnja/v dnevih) (vir: študija CEPEJ16)
Figure 43 below examines six specific aspects: processing time (time limits67 and timeframes68), management of backlogs, active monitoring of cases, information to parties, judgments and allocation of human resources.
Na spodnji sliki 43 je proučenih šest posebnih vidikov: čas obravnavanja (roki67 in časovni okviri68), upravljanje sodnih zaostankov, dejavno spremljanje zadev, obveščanje strank, sodbe in dodelitev človeških virov.
Figure 43: Number of judges* (per 100.000 inhabitants) (source: CEPEJ study)
(prva stopnja/v dnevih) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 43: Specific standards in selected aspects related to the justice system* (source: European Commission72)
Slika 43: Posebni standardi na izbranih področjih, povezanih s pravosodnim sistemom* (vir: Evropska komisija72)
Figure 44: Perceived independence of courts and judges among the general public (source: Eurobarometer76)
Slika 44: Mnenje širše javnosti o neodvisnosti sodišč in sodnikov (vir: Eurobarometer76)
Figure 45: Main reasons among the general public for the perceived lack of independence (share of all respondents — higher value means more influence) (source: Eurobarometer77)
Slika 45: Glavni razlogi za mnenje širše javnosti o pomanjkanju neodvisnosti (delež vseh anketirancev – višja vrednost pomeni večji vpliv) (vir: Eurobarometer77)
Figure 46: Perceived independence of courts and judges among companies (source: Eurobarometer79)
Slika 46: Mnenje podjetij o neodvisnosti sodišč in sodnikov (vir: Eurobarometer79)
Figure 47: Main reasons among companies for the perceived lack of independence (rate of all respondents — higher value means more influence) (source: Eurobarometer80)
Slika 47: Glavni razlogi za mnenje podjetij o pomanjkanju neodvisnosti (delež vseh anketirancev – višja vrednost pomeni večji vpliv) (vir: Eurobarometer80)
Figure 48: WEF: businesses’ perception of judicial independence* (perception — higher value means better perception) (source: World Economic Forum82)
Slika 48: WEF: mnenje podjetij o neodvisnosti sodstva* (mnenje – višja vrednost pomeni boljše mnenje) (vir: Svetovni gospodarski forum82)
Figure 49 and Figure 50 present an expanded and updated comparison of the composition (according to the nomination process) and the main powers of existing Councils in the EU.
Na slikah 49 in 50 je predstavljena razširjena in posodobljena primerjava sestave (po postopku imenovanja) in glavnih pristojnosti sedanjih sodnih svetov v EU.
Figure 49: Composition of the Councils for the Judiciary according to the nomination process*85
Slika 49: Sestava sodnih svetov po postopku imenovanja*85
Figure 4:
Slika 4:
Figure 4: 2010-2013 trends — % of spatial datasets with conforming metadata
Slika 4: Trendi v obdobju 2010–2013 – % zbirk prostorskih podatkov s skladnimi metapodatki
Figure 4: Allocation to funding priorities by fund (2014-20), in % of fund total
Slika 4: Dodeljevanje sredstev prednostnim nalogam po skladu (2014‒2020) v % skupne vrednosti sklada
Figure 4: Average heating, transport and electricity cost including external cost (€/MWh)
Diagram 4: Povprečni stroški ogrevanja, transporta in električne energije vključno z zunanjimi stroški (EUR/MWh)
Figure 4: Barriers to takeovers not covered by the Takeover Bids Directive.
Slika 4: Ovire za prevzeme, ki niso zajete v Direktivi o ponudbah za prevzem.
Figure 4: breast cancer screening — % of women 50-69 screened
Graf 4: Presejalni pregled za raka dojke – odstotek pregledanih žensk, starih med 50 in 69 let
Figure 4: Change in EU-15 greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1990 - 2003, sector projections with existing and with additional measures, 1990 - 2010, and share of sectors in 2003
Diagram 4: Spremembe v emisijah toplogrednih plinov v EU-15 glede na sektor za obdobje 19902003, napovedi za posamezni sektor z obstoječimi in dodatnimi ukrepi za obdobje 19902010 in delež glede na sektor za leto 2003
Figure 4: Change in rail freight transport performance 2000-2005
Slika 4: Sprememba v učinku železniškega prevoza tovora 2000–2005
Figure 4: Decision tree for handling multi-functional processes
Slika 4: Drevo odločanja za obravnavanje večfunkcionalnih postopkov
Figure 4: Employment growth (number of persons employed, aged 20-64) since 2008q1, by Member State
Slika 4: Rast zaposlovanja (število zaposlenih oseb v starosti od 20 do 64 let) od prvega četrtletja leta 2008 po državah članicah
Figure 4: Evolution of net primary productivity (1982-2006).
Slika 4: Razvoj neto primarne produktivnosti (1982–2006)
Figure 4: Fibre to the Home (FTTH) penetration in July 2009
Slika 4: Tehnologija vlaken do doma (FTTH) – doseg v juliju 2009
Figure 4: GDP and GDHI growth and change in GDHI components in the EU
Slika 4: Rast BDP in bruto razpoložljivega dohodka gospodinjstev ter sprememba sestavin bruto razpoložljivega dohodka gospodinjstev v EU
Figure 4: Gross power generation mix 2000-2030 by source in TWh (left)
Slika 4: Bruto proizvodnja električne energije po posameznih virih v obdobju 2000–2030 v TWh (levo)
Figure 4: Innovation Indicators by type of region
Slika 4: Kazalci inovativnosti po vrsti regije
Figure 4: Market mobility and price developments, by service area
Graf 4: Mobilnost trga in razvoj cen po področjih storitev
Figure 4: Ownership distribution of installed RE capacity for power production in Germany (2012).
Slika 4: Lastništvo nameščenih zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov v Nemčiji (2012).
Figure 4: Percentage of regions (urban, rural or balanced), in which compliance rates between 90 and 100 % are reached for Articles 3, 4 and 5.
Slika 4: Delež regij (mestnih, podeželskih ali uravnoteženih), v katerih je bila v zvezi s členi 3, 4 in 5 dosežena 90- do 100-odstotna skladnost.
Figure 4: Prevalence of overweight among school age children, EU-25
Slika 4: Pojav prekomerne telesne teže pri šolskih otrocih, EU-25
Figure 4: Progress in Implementation since 2001 for gas networks.
Slika 4: Napredek pri izvajanju od leta 2001 za plinska omrežja.
Figure 4: Provisional figures and map of registered community energy cooperatives.
Slika4: Začasni podatki o številu registriranih energetskih zadrug in zemljevid njihovih lokacij.
Figure 4: Recommendations
Slika 4: Priporočila
Figure 4: Relationship between data collection, Resource Use and Emissions Profile and EF impact assessment
Slika 4: Povezava med zbiranjem podatkov, profilom rabe virov in emisij ter presojo vpliva okoljskega odtisa
Figure 4: Selection of the correct system boundaries in the case of secondary steam turbines (ST: Steam Turbine)
Slika 4 Izbira pravilnih mej sistema v primeru sekundarnih parnih turbin (PT: parna turbina)
Figure 4: Summary of the conservation status of species by taxonomic grouping (the number in brackets refers to the number of assessments for each group)
Prikaz 4: Povzetek stanja ohranjenosti vrst po taksonomskih skupinah (številke v oklepajih se nanašajo na število ocen, ki so bile opravljene za vsako skupino)
Figure 4: Time needed to resolve civil, commercial, administrative and other cases*
Slika 4: Čas, potreben za reševanje civilnih, gospodarskih, upravnih in drugih zadev
Figure 4: Time needed to resolve insolvency* (in years) (source: World Bank: Doing Business)
Graf 4: Čas, potreben za reševanje primerov plačilne nesposobnosti* (v letih) (vir: Svetovna banka: „Doing Business“)
Figure 4: Trade integration in the single market (source: European Commission)
Slika 4: Trgovinska povezanost na enotnem trgu (vir: Evropska komisija)
Figure 4: Trade integration in the single market (source: European Commission)
Slika 8: Trgovinska povezanost na enotnem trgu (vir: Evropska komisija)
Figure 4: Trends in rail freight transport 2007-2008
Slika 4: Razvoj železniškega tovornega prometa 2007–2008
Figure 4: Variation of GDP per capita in the EU Mediterranean and Black Sea coastal regions, classified following their trend compared with EU-27, 2002-2007
Slika 4: Razlike v BDP na prebivalca v sredozemskih in črnomorskih obalnih območjih EU, razvrščeno glede na njihov trend v primerjavi z EU-27, 2002–2007
Figure 4: Youth unemployment rate and yearly change, as reported in the scoreboard of  key employment and social indicators
Slika 4: Stopnja brezposelnosti mladih in letna sprememba, kot sta razvidni iz pregleda ključnih zaposlitvenih in socialnih kazalnikov
Figure 4a:
Slika 4a:
Figure 4a: IfS Crisis Response implementing partners, 2007 to 2013 (as per funding allocations)
Slika 4a: Izvajalski partnerji pri kriznem odzivanju v okviru instrumenta za stabilnost med letoma 2007 in 2013 (glede na dodeljena finančna sredstva)
Figure 4b:
Slika 4b:
Figure 4b: IfS Crisis Response implementing partners, 2013 (as per funding allocations)
Slika 4b: Izvajalski partnerji pri kriznem odzivanju v okviru instrumenta za stabilnost leta 2013 (glede na dodeljena finančna sredstva)
Figure 4c
Slika 4c
Figure 4c:
Slika 4c:
Figure 5 (Source: BEREC)
Graf 5 (Vir: BEREC)
Figure 5 - Share of early school leavers by nationality, 2005
Slika 5: Delež otrok, ki zgodaj opustijo šolanje, po narodnosti, 2005
Figure 5 below reflects the main thematic areas of support from 2007 to 2013, while figure 6 illustrates the range of implementing partners.
S slike 5 so razvidna glavna tematska področja podpore med letoma 2007 in 2013, slika 6 pa prikazuje razne izvajalske partnerje.
Figure 5 Bivalve molluscs
Slika 5 Školjke
Figure 5 Common data repository
Slika 5 Skupno odložišče podatkov
Figure 5 provides a decision tree for handling multi-functional processes.
Na sliki 5 je predstavljeno drevo odločanja za obravnavanje večfunkcionalnih postopkov.
Figure 5 shows the degree to which different product categories are involved in accidents in ten Member States (product categories that account for less than 0.5% are not displayed).
Graf 5 prikazuje stopnjo vpletenosti različnih kategorij proizvodov pri nezgodah v desetih državah članicah (kategorije proizvodov s stopnjo nižjo od 0,5 % niso prikazane).
Figure 5.
Diagram 5.
Figure 50: Powers of the Councils for the Judiciary*88
Slika 50: Pristojnosti sodnih svetov*88
Figure 513
Slika 513
Figure 51: Criteria for determining financial resources for the judiciary*89
Slika 51: Merila za določanje finančnih virov za sodstvo*89
Figure 528 below illustrates how many renewable energy technologies would be more able to compete with conventional fuels if external costs were reflected in prices.
Spodnji diagram 428 ponazarja, koliko tehnologij obnovljivih virov energije bi bilo sposobnih bolje konkurirati konvencionalnim gorivom, če bi se zunanji stroški odražali v cenah.
Figure 52: The safeguards regarding the transfer of judges without their consent*90 (irremovability of judges)
Slika 52: Jamstva v zvezi s premeščanjem sodnikov brez njihovega soglasja*90 (nezamenljivost sodnikov)
Figure 53: Dismissal of judges at courts of first and second instance*92
Slika 53: Razrešitev sodnikov na sodiščih prve in druge stopnje*92
Figure 54: Allocation of cases within a court95
Slika 54: Dodeljevanje zadev znotraj sodišča95
Figure 55: Withdrawal and recusal of a judge98
Slika 55: Samoizločitev in izločitev sodnikov98
Figure 56: Examples of safeguards examined by the ENCJ102
Slika 56: Primeri jamstev, ki jih je proučila ENCJ102
Figure 57: ENCJ's survey of judges’ perception of independence (perception — higher value means better perception)103
Slika 57: Raziskava ENCJ o mnenju sodnikov o neodvisnosti (mnenje – višja vrednost pomeni boljše mnenje)103
Figure 5:
Slika 5:
Figure 5:  Average consumer price (net system price) for ready installed roof PV facilities of up to 10 kWp.
Slika5: Povprečne potrošniške cene (cena neto sistema) za že nameščene strešne fotovoltaične naprave z napetostjo do 10 kWp.
Figure 5: 2010-2013 trends — % of spatial datasets with discovery services
Slika 5: Trendi v obdobju 2010–2013 – % zbirk prostorskih podatkov s storitvami iskanja
Figure 5: Allocation to funding priorities 2014-20 vs. 2007-13, in % of total
Slika 5: Dodeljevanje sredstev prednostnim nalogam v obdobju 2014‒2020 v primerjavi z obdobjem 2007‒2013 v % skupne vrednosti
Figure 5: At-risk-of-poverty-and-social-exclusion rate and its components in the EU27
Slika 5: Stopnja tveganja revščine in socialne izključenosti ter njene sestavine v EU-27
Figure 5: Average consumer price (net system price) for ready installed roof PV facilities of up to 10 kWp.
Slika5: Povprečne potrošniške cene (cena neto sistema) za že nameščene strešne fotovoltaične naprave z napetostjo do 10 kWp.
Figure 5: Boundary of cogeneration unit for connected prime movers.
Slika 5: Meje naprave za soproizvodnjo povezanih pogonskih strojev
Figure 5: Conservation status of habitat types considered as being associated with agriculture compared to those not associated with agriculture
Prikaz 5: Stanje ohranjenosti habitatnih tipov, ki so povezani s kmetijstvom, v primerjavi s tistimi, ki niso povezani s kmetijstvom
Figure 5: Decision tree for handling multi-functional processes
Slika 5: Drevo odločanja za obravnavanje večfunkcionalnih postopkov
Figure 5: Environmental Pressures Composite Map
Slika 5: Sestavljeni zemljevid obremenitve okolja
Figure 5: Injuries by product involved in the accident — aggregated average for 10 Member States
Graf 5: Poškodbe po proizvodu, vpletenem v nezgodi — zbirno povprečje za 10 držav članic
Figure 5: Investment in the TEN-T network per country and mode in the EU-10 and EU-2 in 2002 and 2003 in millions of EUR
Slika 5: Naložbe v omrežje TEN-T glede na državo in način v EU-10 in EU-2 v letih 2002 in 2003 v milijonih EUR
Figure 5: NEET rate and yearly change, as reported in the scoreboard of key employment and social indicators
Slika 5: Stopnja NEET in letna sprememba, kot sta razvidni iz pregleda ključnih zaposlitvenih in socialnih kazalnikov
Figure 5: Number of works planned for urban waste water collecting systems and treatment plants.
Slika 5: Število del, načrtovanih za kanalizacijske sisteme in čistilne naprave za komunalno odpadno vodo.
Figure 5: Potential threats to soil biodiversity.
Slika 5: Možne grožnje za biotsko raznovrstnost tal
Figure 5: Prevalence of overweight among school-aged children in selected countries of the EU-27, based on surveys 1958-2003
Slika 5: Razširjenost prekomerne telesne teže pri šolskih otrocih v izbranih državah EU-27, na podlagi raziskav med leti 1958 in 2003
Figure 5: Provisional figures and map of registered community energy cooperatives.
Slika 5: Začasni podatki o številu registriranih energetskih zadrug in zemljevid njihovih lokacij.
Figure 5: Rate of resolving civil, commercial, administrative and other cases (1st instance/in % - values higher than 100% indicate that more cases are resolved than come in, while values below 100% indicate that fewer cases are resolved than come in) (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 5: Stopnja reševanja civilnih, gospodarskih, upravnih in drugih zadev (prva stopnja/v % – vrednosti nad 100 % kažejo, da je več zadev rešenih kot prejetih, vrednosti pod 100 % kažejo, da je manj zadev rešenih kot prejetih) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 5: Relationship between data collection, Resource Use and Emissions Profile and EF impact assessment.
Slika 5: Povezava med zbiranjem podatkov, profilom rabe virov in emisij ter presojo vpliva okoljskega odtisa.
Figure 5: Self-declared unmet needs for medical examination by reason, proportion of population (%)
Graf 5: Prijavljene neizpolnjene potrebe po zdravniških pregledih, razvrščene po razlogih, delež prebivalstva (v %)
Figure 5: Time needed to resolve litigious civil and commercial cases*
Slika 5: Čas, potreben za reševanje civilnih in gospodarskih pravdnih zadev
Figure 5: Total ICT R&D spending in billion € (2007)
Slika 5: Celotna poraba za raziskave in razvoj na področju IKT v milijardah EUR (2007)
Figure 5: Trends in passenger rail transport over the period 2000-2007 Source : EU energy and transport in figures statistical pocketbook 2009, Table 3.3.7.
Slika 5: Razvoj železniškega prevoza potnikov v obdobju 2000–2007Vir: Statistična knjižica „Energija in promet v EU leta 2009 v številkah“ (EU Energy and Transport in Figures Statistical Pocketbook 2009), tabela 3.3.7.
Figure 6  Process overview diagram for the production stage at a T-shirt company
Slika 6: Diagram pregleda postopkov za proizvodno fazo v podjetju, ki izdeluje majice
Figure 6 : The European Digital Agenda Governance Cycle
Slika 6: Cikel upravljanja evropske digitalne agende
Figure 6 shows that the prevalence of cross-border activity still varies significantly across the EU.
Graf 6 prikazuje, da se razširjenost čezmejne dejavnosti še vedno občutno razlikuje v EU.
Figure 6 shows the total market shares of non-incumbent railway undertakings providing freight services.
Slika 6 prikazuje skupne tržne deleže neuveljavljenih prevoznikov v železniškem prometu, ki zagotavljajo storitve prevoza tovora.
Figure 6.1.a
Slika 6.1.a
Figure 6.1.b
Slika 6.1.b
Figure 6.1.c
Slika 6.1.c
Figure 6:
Slika 6:
Figure 6: 2010-2013 trends — % of spatial datasets with view services
Slika 6: Trendi v obdobju 2010–2013 – % zbirk prostorskih podatkov s storitvami pregledovanja
Figure 6: Consumers purchasing and retailers selling cross-border
Graf 6: Čezmejni potrošniki in čezmejni trgovci na drobno
Figure 6: Current versus expected investments in urban waste water collecting systems and treatment plants.
Slika 6: Sedanje in pričakovane naložbe v kanalizacijske sisteme in čistilne naprave za komunalno odpadno vodo.
Figure 6: Historical development of electricity generation from solid biomass, biogas and municipal solid waste in the EU-25 Member States from 1990 to 2004 and extrapolation to 2010 assuming a yearly growth rate of 19%23.
Diagram 6: Pretekli razvoj proizvodnje električne energije iz trdne biomase, bioplina in komunalnih trdnih odpadkov v državah članicah EU-25 od leta 1990 do 2004 in ekstrapoliranje do leta 2010 ob predvideni letni stopnji rasti 19 %23.
Figure 6: Landslide susceptibility in the EU and neighbouring countries (preliminary map)38.
Slika 6: Nevarnost zemeljskih plazov v EU in sosednjih državah (predhodna karta)38
Figure 6: Long-term unemployment rates (2008, 2014 and maximum levels)
Slika 6: Stopnje dolgotrajne brezposelnosti (2008, 2014 in najvišje ravni)
Figure 6: Mobility rate by Member State by years of residence, 2013
Slika 6: Stopnja mobilnosti po državah članicah glede na leta bivanja, za leto 2013
Figure 6: Rate of resolving litigious civil and commercial cases (1st instance/in %) (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 6: Stopnja reševanja civilnih in gospodarskih pravdnih zadev* (prva stopnja/v %) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 6: S80/S20 income quintile share ratio
Slika 6: S80/S20 (razmerje kvintilnih razredov)
Figure 6: Schematic representation of direct and indirect land use changes [adapted from (CE Delft 2010)].
Slika 6: Shematski prikaz neposrednih in posrednih sprememb rabe zemljišča [na podlagi (CE Delft 2010)].
Figure 6: Time needed to resolve administrative cases* (first instance/in days) (source: CEPEJ study)
Slika 6: Čas, potreben za reševanje upravnih zadev* (prva stopnja/v dnevih) (vir: študija CEPEJ)