natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4.2 The EESC considers that standardisation bodies should be encouraged to assess, as part of their work programmes, their policies with regard to intellectual policy rights (IPR), with a greater focus on promoting innovation and closer links with patent offices, especially the European one in Munich, so that matters of intellectual property can be considered from the outset, thus ensuring better quality both of patents and of standards.
4.2 Po mnenju EESO je treba organizacije za standardizacijo spodbujati, da v svojih delovnih programih pozorneje ocenijo svoje politike na področju pravic intelektualne lastnine z vidika spodbujanja inovativnosti in krepitve odnosov s patentnimi uradi – še zlasti z Evropskim patentnim uradom v Münchnu –, da se tako zagotovi obravnavanje vprašanj intelektualne lastnine že od vsega začetka in s tem izboljša kakovost tako patentov kot standardov.
4.2 The EESC considers that the European Central Bank cannot be left to combat the current recession in the euro area on its own.
4.2 EESO meni, da Evropski centralni banki ne smemo prepustiti, da se sama bori proti sedanji recesiji v euroobmočju.
4.2 The EESC considers that the high-level group which will be set up to decide on regulation and identify the main issues, along with the coordinators responsible for the various topics, can embody this new form of institutionalised cooperation at macro-regional level, which may also be supported by the legislative changes which will be formulated in the region where appropriate.
4.2 EESO meni, da to novo obliko institucionaliziranega sodelovanja na makroregionalni ravni, ki ga bodo morda podprle tudi zakonodajne spremembe, po potrebi uvedene v Podonavju, lahko skupaj s koordinatorji, odgovornimi za različne tematike, uteleša skupina na visoki ravni, ki bo ustanovljena za določitev zakonodaje in opredelitev glavnih vprašanj.
4.2 The EESC considers that the internal market should be developed in such a way as to ensure that it includes disability, standardisation and harmonisation of accessibility, as a means to modernise it and make it more competitive and inclusive in a global economy.
4.2 EESO meni, da bi bilo notranji trg treba razviti tako, da vključuje invalidnost, standardizacijo in usklajenost dostopnosti kot način posodabljanja notranjega trga, ki bo tako v svetovnem gospodarstvu konkurenčnejši in bolj vključujoč.
4.2 The EESC considers that the internal market should be developed in such a way as to ensure that it includes disability, standardisation and harmonisation, as a means to modernise it and make it more competitive and inclusive in a global economy.
4.2 EESO meni, da bi bilo notranji trg treba razviti tako, da vključuje invalidnost, standardizacijo in usklajenost kot način posodabljanja notranjega trga, ki bo tako v svetovnem gospodarstvu konkurenčnejši in bolj vključujoč.
4.2 The EESC considers that the monitoring of the Equal Treatment directive in Employment and Occupation should continue to be a priority in the period covered by the DAP.
4.2 EESO meni, da bi moralo biti spremljanje direktive o enaki obravnavi pri zaposlovanju in delu še naprej prednostna naloga za programsko obdobje DAP.
4.2 The EESC considers that the proposal for a radical reform of how the EU 2020 strategy is implemented requires a thorough rethink of key concepts and aspects of the strategy that was introduced four years ago, as regards: the very development concept underpinning the strategy itself, the way in which targets are identified, as well as the policy for achieving, monitoring and evaluating them, the establishment of an efficient and effective multi-level governance of the strategy and improving participation by the European public and by civil society organisations.
4.2 Po mnenju EESO predlog radikalne reforme izvajanja strategije Evropa 2020 zahteva premislek o ključnih vidikih in dejavnikih strategije, ki je nastala pred štirimi leti, kot so: sama idejo o razvoju, ki je podlaga strategije, način določanja ciljev ter ukrepi za njihovo uresničitev, spremljanje in ocenjevanje, določanje učinkovitega in uspešnega upravljanja strategije na več ravneh ter izboljšanje sodelovanja evropske javnosti in organizacij civilne družbe.
4.2 The EESC considers that the proposal for a radical reform of how the EU 2020 strategy is implemented requires a thorough rethink of key concepts and aspects of the strategy that was introduced four years ago, as regards: the very development concept underpinning the strategy itself, the way in which targets are identified, as well as the policy for achieving, monitoring and evaluating them, the establishment of an efficient and effective multi-level governance of the strategy and improving participation by the European public and by civil society organisations.
4.2 Po mnenju EESO predlog radikalne reforme izvajanja strategije Evropa 2020 zahteva temeljit premislek o ključnih vidikih in dejavnikih strategije, ki je nastala pred štirimi leti, kot so: sama ideja o razvoju, ki je podlaga strategije, način določanja ciljev ter ukrepi za njihovo uresničitev, spremljanje in ocenjevanje, določanje učinkovitega in uspešnega upravljanja strategije na več ravneh ter izboljšanje sodelovanja evropske javnosti in organizacij civilne družbe.
4.2 The EESC considers that there is much room for deepening in numerous areas, of which it would like to list just a few:
4.2 EESO ocenjuje, da je za poglobitev veliko prostora na številnih področjih, med katerimi želi izpostaviti le nekatera:
4.2 The EESC draws attention to the fact that near the EU's external land borders there is an increased danger of wild animals spreading infectious animal diseases in the Member States.
4.2 EESO opozarja, da je v bližini zunanjih meja EU povečana nevarnost, da divje živali razširijo nalezljive živalske bolezni v države članice.
4.2 The EESC during the Hungarian presidency
4.2 EESO med madžarskim predsedovanjem
4.2 The EESC emphasises that in implementing the forestry strategy attention should be paid to aligning its objectives with the EU's Lisbon and Gothenburg strategies.
4.2 EESC poudarja, da je treba pri izvajanju gozdarske strategije upošteva združljivost s cilji lizbonske in göteburške strategije EU.
4.2 The EESC emphasises that the essence of an effective investment vehicle is that it should enable different types of investor to carry out joint investments, while ensuring tax optimisation, especially as regards avoiding double taxation (at issue here is the tax paid on the portfolio investment and tax on the distribution of funds back to investors in the fund) .
4.2 EESO poudarja, da je srž učinkovitega naložbenega instrumenta v tem, da različnim vrstam vlagateljev omogoči skupno izvajanje naložb in obenem zagotovi davčno optimizacijo, zlasti za izogibanje dvojni obdavčitvi (gre za davek na portfeljske naložbe in davek na povračila sredstev vlagateljem v skladu).
4.2 The EESC emphasises that the postponement of the transposition deadline will not make good the directive's shortcomings and once again, in line with its opinion of 1993, draws attention to the need for precise definitions and provisions, to enable direct and effective application for businesses, particularly SMEs, and to ensure that lack of precision is not used as an excuse for limiting the exercise of workers' rights in practice.
4.2 EESO poudarja, da odlog prenosa ne bo odpravil vsebinskih slabosti direktive, in – kot že v mnenju iz leta 1993 – opozarja na potrebo po natančnih opredelitvah in določbah, ki jih lahko podjetja, predvsem mala in srednje velika, neposredno in učinkovito uporabljajo, da odsotnosti takšnih natančnih zahtev ne bi izkoriščali za omejevanje pravic delavcev v praksi.
4.2 The EESC emphasizes that the postponement of the transposition deadline will not solve the recently identified problems, which are related to imprecise definitions.
4.2 EESO poudarja, da odlog prenosa ne bo odpravil pred kratkim ugotovljenih težav, ki so povezane z nenatančnimi opredelitvami.
4.2 The EESC emphasizes that the postponement of the transposition deadline will not, on its own, solve the recently identified problems, which are related to imprecise definitions.
4.2 EESO poudarja, da odlog prenosa sam po sebi ne bo odpravil pred kratkim ugotovljenih težav, ki so povezane z nenatančnimi opredelitvami.
4.2 The EESC encourages the Commission to simplify the process of this extension by keeping close to the existing harmonised legislative framework applied to agricultural/food products where relevant, applying best practice, and learning from the experiences of introducing protection for this sector to inform the system to be applied to non-agricultural products.
4.2 EESO spodbuja Komisijo, naj poenostavi postopek te razširitve in se, kjer je to primerno, ne oddalji preveč od obstoječega usklajenega zakonodajnega okvira za kmetijske in živilske proizvode ter pri uvajanju sistema za nekmetijske proizvode izhaja iz najboljše prakse in izkušenj pri uvedbi zaščite v tem sektorju.
4.2 The EESC endorses a world-wide approach to prudential requirements with the aim of extending regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets19.
4.2 EESO je zadovoljen, ker se bonitetni nadzor obravnava v mednarodnem okviru, kar naj bi omogočilo razširitev regulacije in nadzora na vse sistemsko pomembne finančne institucije, instrumente in trge19.
4.2 The EESC endorses the new two-stream legislative procedure, while stressing the need for the two regulations - one the product of co-decision, the other of comitology - to be published in the Official Journal simultaneously.
4.2 EESO odobrava nov zakonodajni postopek v dveh tokovih, čeprav poudarja, da je treba uredbi – eno kot rezultat soodločanja, drugo kot rezultat postopka komitologije – objaviti v Uradnem listu istočasno.
4.2 The EESC endorses the new two-stream legislative procedure, while stressing the need for the two regulations - one the product of co-decision, the other of comitology - to be published in the Official Journal simultaneously.
4.2 EESO odobrava nov zakonodajni postopek v dveh vzporednih korakih, čeprav poudarja, da je treba uredbi – eno kot rezultat soodločanja, drugo kot rezultat postopka komitologije – objaviti v Uradnem listu istočasno.
4.2 The EESC expresses its satisfaction that the current proposal seems to have corrected most of the shortcomings of the previous version identified by both the industry and passengers5 and at the same time clarified a number of definitions.
4.2 EESO z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je v tem predlogu večina pomanjkljivosti prejšnje različice, ki so jih ugotovili tako sektor kot potniki5, videti odpravljena, obenem pa so bile jasneje podane številne opredelitve.
4.2 The EESC feels that a better way of defining the sector should be found, with clearer definitions in the Eurostat NACE code system, to make it easier to keep abreast of its economic trends, investment and innovation, employment and professional qualifications.
4.2 EESO meni, da je treba sektor bolje določiti, da bi ga lahko bolj jasno opredelili v Eurostatovi kvalifikaciji dejavnosti NACE, s čimer bi lahko bolje sledili njegovemu gospodarskemu razvoju, naložbam, inovacijam, zaposlovanju in poklicnim kvalifikacijam.
4.2 The EESC feels that it should be specified that customs controls must be avoided on individuals carrying strictly personal items that they possess in very limited quantities when crossing internal borders or coming from a third country; nor must the exchange or sale of a garment or a gift to a charity be deemed to be trade falling within the scope of the regulation.
4.2 Odbor meni, da bi bilo treba natančneje navesti, da se je treba izogibati carinskim nadzorom fizičnih oseb zaradi predmetov, ki so izključno osebni in ki jih pri prestopu notranjih meja ali prihodu iz tretjih držav lahko posedujejo v zelo omejenih količinah.
4.2 The EESC feels that more powers should be given at EU and FAB level to help overcome the current problem whereby Member States focus on protecting their own national ANSPs or using them as national economy tools rather than on creating value added for airspace users and customers/passengers.
4.2 EESO meni, da je treba povečati pristojnosti na ravni EU in funkcionalnih blokov zračnega prometa; na ta način bi odpravili sedanji problem, da države članice ščitijo predvsem lastne nacionalne navigacijske službe zračnega prometa oziroma jih uporabljajo kot instrumente nacionalnega gospodarstva, namesto da bi ustvarjale dodano vrednost za uporabnike zračnega prostora in stranke oziroma potnike.
4.2 The EESC feels that more powers should be given at EU and FAB level to help overcome the current problem whereby Member States focus on protecting their own national ANSPs or using them as national economy tools rather than on creating value added for airspace users and customers/passengers.
4.2 EESO meni, da je treba povečati pristojnosti na ravni EU in funkcionalnih blokov zračnega prometa; na ta način bi odpravili sedanji problem, da države članice ščitijo predvsem svoje lastne, nacionalne navigacijske službe zračnega prometa oziroma jih uporabljajo kot instrumente nacionalnega gospodarstva, namesto da bi ustvarjale dodano vrednost za uporabnike zračnega prostora in stranke oziroma potnike.
4.2 The EESC feels that the proposed legislation is still too complex and that a further creative effort is needed to establish the conditions necessary for market mechanisms to recognise the environmental added value of EMAS, and for public authorities to simplify the entire administrative framework and encourage more environmentally-friendly product design, providing for new forms of protection, particularly for SMEs.
4.2 Po mnenju Odbora je predlagani zakonodajni sveženj še vedno preveč kompleksen in  potreben je dodaten napor, da bi ustvarili primerne pogoje za to, da bi tržni mehanizmi sistemu EMAS priznali dodano vrednost, oblasti pa poenostavile celoten upravni okvir in spodbujale okolju prijaznejšo zasnovo izdelkov z določitvijo novih oblik varovanja, zlasti za MSP.
4.2 The EESC feels that the proposed legislation is still too complex and that a further creative effort is needed to establish the conditions necessary for market mechanisms to recognise the environmental added value of EMAS, and for public authorities to simplify the entire administrative framework and encourage more environmentally-friendly product design, providing for new forms of protection, particularly for SMEs.
4.2 Po mnenju Odbora je predlagani zakonodajni sveženj še vedno preveč kompleksen in potreben je dodaten napor, da bi ustvarili primerne pogoje za to, da bi tržni mehanizmi sistemu EMAS priznali dodano vrednost, oblasti pa poenostavile celoten upravni okvir in spodbujale okolju prijaznejšo zasnovo izdelkov z določitvijo novih oblik varovanja, zlasti za MSP.
4.2 The EESC feels that the redefined objectives are appropriate, particularly the new objective of “competitiveness and employment”, which combines employment and structural policy objectives, both to be treated with equal weight.
4.2 EESO ocenjuje, da je nova opredelitev ciljev pravilna, predvsem zato, ker so v nov cilj konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja zajeti cilji politike zaposlovanja in strukturne politike, ki jih je treba obravnavati enakopravno.
4.2 The EESC feels that – despite the implementation of three successive multi-annual programmes, IDA I, IDA II and IDABC –  the measures taken are as yet insufficient to avoid market fragmentation and to give interconnected public administrations a genuine pan‑European dimension so that they can deliver services uninhibited by barriers and free of discrimination to preserve market unity and fully implement the rights of the public and Community businesses throughout the EU.
4.2 Odbor meni, da sprejeti ukrepi – kljub izvajanju treh zaporednih večletnih programov (IDA I, IDA II in IDABC) – še vedno ne zadostujejo za to, da bi preprečili razdrobljenost trga in medsebojno povezanim javnim upravam dali resnično vseevropsko razsežnost, kar bi jim omogočilo neovirano in nediskriminatorno zagotavljanje storitev za ohranitev enotnosti trga ter neomejeno izvajanje pravic državljanov in podjetij Skupnosti v celotni Uniji.
4.2 The EESC finds legal certainty to be of the utmost importance and notes the legal uncertainty concerning foreign workers who are posted by a temporary agency.
4.2 EESO meni, da je pravna gotovost izjemno pomembna, in ugotavlja, da se v zvezi s tujimi delavci, ki jih napoti agencija za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, pojavlja pravna negotovost.
4.2 The EESC fully concurs with the analysis of the important and positive role which sport plays in society.
4.2 EESO se popolnoma strinja z analizo pomembne in pozitivne vloge športa v družbi.
4.2 The EESC fully supports a more diversified and proportionate approach to the different types of public service, that also seeks to clarify the financing rules.
4.2 EESO v celoti podpira bolj raznolik in sorazmeren pristop, ki upošteva različne vrste javnih storitev in katerega cilj je pojasniti pravila glede financiranja.
4.2 The EESC fully supports the Commission's decision to issue a Green Paper on the matter, with the aim of definitively abolishing the transitional system and embarking on a process to harmonise the jungle of rates, derogations, reduced schemes, "parking" rates and all legislation on the subject, despite the fact that, in the past, narrow national interests have stymied simplification and full completion of the internal market.
4.2 Odbor odločno podpira odločitev Komisije o objavi zelene knjige o tej temi, da bi dokončno odpravila prehodni režim in v labirintu davčnih stopenj, odstopanj ter znižanih in začasnih stopenj – skratka, v celotni ureditvi – sproži proces usklajevanja, čeprav so ustrezne izkušnje v preteklosti pokazale, da so prevladovali ozki nacionalni interesi, ki so se postavljali po robu poenostavitvi in dokončni uresničitvi notranjega trga.
4.2 The EESC fully supports the proposal.
4.2 EESO popolnoma odobrava predlog Komisije.
4.2 The EESC fully supports the targets and the Commission's general approach to establishing a comprehensive programme of action.
4.2 EESO popolnoma podpira te cilje in splošni pristop Komisije k oblikovanju celostnega programa ukrepov.
4.2 The EESC had already expressed its dissatisfaction with:
4.2 EESO je že izrazil obžalovanje glede naslednjega:
4.2 The EESC has already expressed its dissatisfaction with:
4.2 EESO je že izrazil obžalovanje glede naslednjega:
4.2 The EESC has been endorsing the work on antitrust legislation, which it deems to be vital to competition policy.
4.2 EESO podpira delo na področju protimonopolnih pravil, saj meni, da je ključno za politiko konkurence.
4.2 The EESC has firmly stressed that "the free movement of goods is an essential driver for competitiveness and the economic and social development of the European single market and that reinforcement and updating of the requirements for the marketing of safe, high-quality products are key factors for consumers, businesses and European citizens15."
4.2 EESO je že izrecno opozoril, "da je prosti pretok blaga ena glavnih gonilnih sil za konkurenčnost ter gospodarsko rast in socialni razvoj evropskega enotnega trga ter da sta krepitev in posodabljanje pogojev trženja varnih, visokokakovostnih izdelkov ključna dejavnika za potrošnike, podjetja in evropske državljane"15.
4.2 The EESC has identified three factors that together can be said to explain why the effects of the strategies have diverged:
4.2 Odbor je opredelil tri dejavnike, ki lahko skupaj pojasnijo, zakaj imata obe strategiji različne učinke:
4.2 The EESC has in the context of the newly established Eastern Europe Contact Group (EECG) carried on its activities in the field of the Northern Dimension.
4.2 Svoje aktivnosti v okviru severne dimenzije je EESO nadaljeval tudi v novo ustanovljeni kontaktni skupini za Vzhodno Evropo.
4.2 The EESC has some concerns that, by opting for a regulation as the preferred legal instrument, the Commission's proposal may lead:
4.2 EESO ima nekaj pomislekov, da bi zaradi izbire uredbe kot ustreznejšega pravnega instrumenta predlog Komisije lahko privedel do:
4.2 The EESC has some concerns that, by opting for a Regulation as the preferred legal instrument, the Commission's Proposal may lead:
4.2 EESO ima nekaj pomislekov, da bi zaradi izbire uredbe kot ustreznejšega pravnega instrumenta predlog Komisije lahko privedel do:
4.2 The EESC in particular welcomes the Commission's pragmatic approach based on subsidiarity and proportionality.
4.2 EESO zlasti pozdravlja pragmatičen pristop Komisije, ki temelji na subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti.
4.2 The EESC is aware that representatives of civil society organisations have in a number of cases been threatened verbally and through legal prosecution, sometimes personally, and have faced unjustified restrictions on their civil society activities.
4.2 EESO se zaveda, da so predstavnikom organizacij civilne družbe večkrat grozili verbalno in s pravnim pregonom, včasih tudi osebno, ter jih neupravičeno omejevali pri njihovem civilnodružbenem delovanju.
4.2 The EESC is concerned that the Communication has too academic an approach and the recommendations are too vague and open to interpretation.
4.2 EESO izraža zaskrbljenost, da je pristop, na katerem temelji sporočilo, preveč akademski ter da so priporočila preveč nejasna in jih je mogoče različno razumeti.
4.2 The EESC is concerned that the Communication has too academic an approach and the recommendations are too vague and open to interpretation.
4.2 EESO izraža zaskrbljenost, ker je pristop, na katerem temelji sporočilo, preveč akademski ter priporočila preveč nejasna in jih je mogoče različno razumeti.
4.2 The EESC is convinced that a greater participation of organised civil society in all steps of the process will increase the quality of the NAPs.
4.2 EESO je prepričan, da bo večja udeležba organizirane civilne družbe v vseh fazah postopka povečala kakovost nacionalnih programov reform.
4.2 The EESC is disappointed that the Communication does not make a stronger statement on the need for Member State to implement with a sense of urgency their existing European and international commitments to children's rights, in particular under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
4.2 EESO izraža razočaranje nad dejstvom, da sporočilo ne poudarja bolj odločno, da morajo države članice nujno pričeti izvajati obstoječe evropske in mednarodne zaveze v zvezi z otrokovimi pravicami, zlasti Konvencijo Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah.
4.2 The EESC is disappointed that the Communication does not make a stronger statement on the need for Member State to implement with a sense of urgency their existing European and international commitments to children's rights, in particular under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
4.2 EESO izraža razočaranje nad dejstvom, da sporočilo ne poudarja bolj odločno, da morajo države članice obstoječe evropske in mednarodne zaveze v zvezi z otrokovimi pravicami, zlasti Konvencijo Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah, nujno pričeti izvajati.
4.2 The EESC is disappointed that the Communication does not make a stronger statement on the need for Member State to implement with a sense of urgency their existing European and international commitments to children's rights, in particular under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
4.2 EESO je razočaran, da sporočilo ne daje odločnejše izjave o nujnosti, da države članice izvajajo obstoječe evropske in mednarodne zaveze v zvezi z otrokovimi pravicami, zlasti Konvencijo Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah.
4.2 The EESC is doubtful about the real trustworthiness in future of self-compiled credit assessments and consequent reliance on them.
4.2 EESO izraža dvome glede dejanske zanesljivosti prihodnjega samoocenjevanja kreditnega tveganja in posledičnega zanašanja nanj.
4.2 The EESC is in favour of clear and more information for consumers on what they are agreeing to.
4.2 EESO podpira, da se potrošnike jasneje in bolje seznani s tem, kaj so sklenili.