natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1.7 The EESC agrees with the conclusions of the Environment Council of 28 June 2007 and supports the proposal for the Commission to review the 6th environmental action programme in the light of the priorities identified:
1.7 EESO se strinja s sklepi Sveta o okolju z dne 28. junija 2007 in podpira predlog, naj Komisija pregleda Šesti akcijski program za okolje z vidika ugotovljenih prednostnih nalog:
1.7 The EESC agrees with the main elements of the three-phase scenario to gain a single chair at the IMF and the transitional stages leading up to this.
1.7 EESO se strinja z glavnimi elementi načrta v treh fazah, da se do leta 2025 vzpostavi enotni sedež v MDS, in s prehodnimi fazami za dosego tega.
1.7 The EESC agrees with the main elements of the three-phase scenario to gain a single chair at the IMF by 2025 and the transitional stages leading up to this.
1.7 EESO se strinja z glavnimi elementi načrta v treh fazah, da se do leta 2025 vzpostavi enotni sedež v MDS, in s prehodnimi fazami za dosego tega.
1.7 The EESC agrees with the need for joint European CO2 transport and storage infrastructure.
1.7 EESO se strinja, da je skupna evropska infrastruktura za prevoz in shranjevanje CO2 nujna.
1.7 The EESC agrees with the proposed support for inland fishing.
1.7 Odbor se strinja s predvidenimi pomočmi za ribolov v celinskih vodah.
1.7 The EESC also believes that these principles are paramount to the future development of the internet as a tool for better citizenship at the heart of the EU Charter on fundamental Rights and as an essential condition for the fulfilment of the WSIS Targets defined in Geneva (2003) and Tunis (2005).
1.7 EESO tudi meni, da so ta načela ključna za prihodnji razvoj interneta kot orodja za boljše državljanstvo, ki je v osrčju Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah, in kot bistvenega pogoja za izpolnjevanje ciljev Svetovnega vrha o informacijski družbi (SVID), ki so bili opredeljeni leta 2003 v Ženevi in leta 2005 v Tunisu.
1.7 The EESC also believes that these principles are paramount to the future development of the internet as a tool for better citizenship on the grounds of the EU Charter on fundamental Rights and as an essential condition for the fulfilment of the WSIS Targets defined in Geneva (2003) and Tunis (2005).
1.7 EESO tudi meni, da so ta načela ključna za prihodnji razvoj interneta kot orodja za boljše državljanstvo na podlagi Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah in so bistven pogoj za izpolnjevanje ciljev Svetovnega vrha o informacijski družbi (SVID), ki so bili opredeljeni leta 2003 v Ženevi in leta 2005 v Tunisu.
1.7 The EESC also calls for a Europe-wide public dialogue on energy (the European Energy Dialogue) to allow the whole of civil society to take ownership of the energy transition and to influence future decisions on energy storage technologies.
1.7 Zavzema se tudi, da se v celotni Evropi organizira javna razprava o vprašanju energije – evropski energetski dialog –, da se bodo državljani in civilna družba kot celota začeli zanimati za energetski prehod ter bodo lahko vplivali na prihodnje tehnološke odločitve na področju shranjevanja energije.
1.7 The EESC also calls for the solutions to be accessible to everyone, by overcoming language barriers and ensuring access for disabled people.
1.7 EESO prav tako meni, da morajo biti predlagane rešitve dostopne vsem, pri čemer je treba preseči jezikovne ovire in zagotoviti dostop invalidom.
1.7 The EESC also calls for the training of administrators to be strengthened and believes that the exchange of good practices in the field should be promoted.
1.7 EESO tudi poziva, naj se izboljša usposabljanje direktorjev, in meni, da je treba spodbujati izmenjavo dobrih praks na tem področju.
1.7 The EESC also considers that the proposed directive could make for a more level playing field for competition in the European market by tackling a situation where certain companies are exempted from certain obligations, notably in terms of information and consultation, which are mandatory for competing companies based in other Member States.
1.7 EESO prav tako meni, da bi predlog direktive lahko pripomogel k bolj izenačenim konkurenčnim pogojem na evropskem trgu, tako da bi obravnaval primere, v katerih so nekatera podjetja oproščena nekaterih obveznosti, na primer glede obveščanja in posvetovanja, ki se zahtevajo od njihovih konkurentov s sedežem v drugih državah članicah.
1.7 The EESC also encourages the European Institutions to take on board and assume the objectives of the DAP at European level.
1.7 EESO poleg tega spodbuja evropske institucije, da upoštevajo in prevzamejo cilje DAP na evropski ravni.
1.7 The EESC also hopes that the impact of the legislative instrument chosen will be as neutral as possible when it comes to competition between manufacturers, not imposing binding limits on the models they can put on the market, but rather guiding consumer demand towards lower emission models.
1.7 EESO upa tudi, da bo vpliv izbranega zakonodajnega instrumenta na konkurenco med proizvajalci kar najbolj nevtralen in da ne bo zavezujoče omejeval proizvajalcev glede modelov, ki jih ponujajo na trgu, temveč da bo usmerjal povpraševanje kupcev k modelom z manjšimi emisijami.
1.7 The EESC also notes the twin dangers of over-classification and over-labelling which eventually diminish the impact of warnings that are absolutely essential, and of relying on labels as the only sources of information for workers and consumers alike.
1.7 EESO opaža tudi dvojno nevarnost pretiranega razvrščanja in označevanja, ki konec koncev zmanjšujeta učinek bistvenih opozoril, ter zanašanja na oznake kot edine vire informacij za delavce in potrošnike.
1.7 The EESC also recommends that all interested parties participate in creating the conclusions and recommendations of the European PES network.
1.7 EESO hkrati priporoča, da pri izvajanju sklepov in priporočil evropske mreže JZZ sodelujejo vsi zadevni akterji.
1.7 The EESC also recommends that all interested parties participate in creating the content and recommendations on the PES site.
1.7 EESO hkrati priporoča, da pri izvajanju sklepov in priporočil evropske mreže JZZ sodelujejo vsi zadevni akterji.
1.7 The EESC also recommends that the principle of independence not be replaced by the vague notion "principle of impartiality", which has other, less specific content and is different in nature.
1.7 EESO priporoča tudi, naj se načelo neodvisnosti ne nadomesti z nejasnim pojmom "načelo nepristranskosti", ki ima drugačno, manj konkretno vsebino in je drugačne narave.
1.7 The EESC also recommends that the principle of independence not be replaced by the vague notion “principle of impartiality”, which has other, less specific content and is different in nature.
1.7 EESO priporoča tudi, naj se načelo neodvisnosti ne nadomesti z nejasnim pojmom "načelo nepristranskosti", ki ima drugačno, manj konkretno vsebino in je drugačne narave.
1.7 The EESC also regrets that the "no legacy" principle, which involves renewing IT systems and technologies in public administrations so as to keep pace with technological developments, does not feature among the adopted principles.
1.7 Poleg tega EESO obžaluje, da med izbranimi načeli ni načela „brez podedovanega“, ki predvideva stalno posodabljanje sistemov informacijske tehnologije v javnih upravah, da bi bili vedno v skladu z razvojem tehnologije.
1.7 The EESC also regrets the limited information on measures taken by Member States to mainstream disability, and calls on the European Commission to develop a tool for the collection and assessment of information about Member States’ policies.
1.7 EESO obžaluje skope informacije o ukrepih držav članic za vključevanje vprašanj invalidnosti in poziva Evropsko komisijo k razvoju orodja za zbiranje in oceno informacij o politikah držav članic.
1.7 The EESC also reiterates that, in view of the expanded EURES remit and new roles in support services, the National Coordination Offices should have enough personnel and other resources to carry out their work, including good staff training schemes.
1.7 EESO ponovno izpostavlja, da morajo glede na razširitev pristojnosti EURES in novih vlog pri podpornih storitvah nacionalni uradi za usklajevanje imeti dovolj osebja in drugih virov za opravljanje svojega dela, vključno z dobrimi shemami za usposabljanje osebja.
1.7 The EESC also takes the view that incorrectly invoking a shared legal basis for the two policies, which are defined respectively in Articles 152 and 153 of the Treaty, could have the perverse effect of bringing consumer protection policy into line with the strict complementarity and subsidiarity criteria that underpin public health policy, to the detriment of the EU's own powers in this field.
1.7 Razen tega EESO meni, da bi nepravilno sklicevanje na skupno pravno podlago za omenjeni politiki, ki sta opredeljeni v členih 152 in 153 Pogodbe, lahko imelo nasproten učinek, saj bi politiko varstva potrošnikov morali uskladiti s strogimi merili dopolnjevanja in subsidiarnosti, na katerih temelji politika javnega zdravja, v škodo pristojnostim EU na področju varstva potrošnikov.
1.7 The EESC also welcomes the Commission's endeavours to extend national accounts to environmental and social issues.
1.7. EESO pozdravlja tudi prizadevanja Komisije za razširitev nacionalnih računov na okoljska in družbena vprašanja.
1.7 The EESC also welcomes the proposals on banking mobility.
1.7 EESO podpira tudi predloge o bančni mobilnosti.
1.7 The EESC appreciates the technically and legally coherent and well-structured form of the proposal, and generally agrees with its innovative measures, which include:
1.7 EESO je zadovoljen s tehnično, pravno usklajeno in dobro strukturirano obliko predloga ter se na splošno strinja z inovativnimi ukrepi, ki vključujejo:
1.7 The EESC asks that small and micro-enterprises be represented in the negotiation process, with at least one specific seat on the TTIP Advisory Board.
1.7 EESO poziva, naj bodo mala in mikro podjetja zastopana v pogajanjih, pri čemer bi morala imeti vsaj enega svojega predstavnika v svetovalni skupini (TTIP Advisory Board – svetovalni odbor TTIP).
1.7 The EESC asks that the promotion of social dialogue be included among the key priorities of the EU institutions as regards Albania, and that it should therefore be reflected in all EC programmes available to the country.
1.7 EESO poziva, da se spodbujanje socialnega dialoga vključi med ključne prednostne naloge institucij EU glede Albanije in da se ta zato mora odražati v vseh programih Komisije, ki so na voljo državi.
1.7 The EESC asks the Commission and Member States, who are mainly responsible for the enforcement of both road transport and social legislation to prioritise the following:
1.7 EESO poziva Komisijo in države članice, ki so v glavnem odgovorne za izvrševanje cestnoprometnih predpisov in socialne zakonodaje, naj prednost namenijo:
1.7 The EESC asks the Commission to define the role of each of the partners in the light of Article 4 on cooperation.
1.7 Odbor Komisijo poziva, naj podrobno opredeli vlogo vseh partnerjev iz člena 4, ki se nanaša na sodelovanje.
1.7 The EESC believes it is important for the EU single market to function in a way that supports an environment in which companies and organisations are motivated to develop innovativeness.
1.7 EESO meni, da mora enotni trg EU delovati tako, da ustvarja okolje, v katerem so podjetja in organizacije motivirani za razvoj inovativnosti.
1.7 The EESC believes that a contract should be drawn up between the performers represented and members of collecting societies to ensure that royalties are managed and collected legally.
1.7 Odbor meni, da bi bilo treba skleniti pisni sporazum med izvajalci in člani kolektivnih organizacij, ki jih zastopajo, da bi tako zagotovili zakonito upravljanje z avtorskimi honorarji in njihovo zaračunavanje.
1.7 The EESC believes that a distinction must be made between information and advice.
1.7 EESO je prepričan, da je treba razlikovati med informacijami in svetovanjem.
1.7 The EESC believes that a European Mobility Card would be a concrete and effective tool to promote the freedom of movement for persons with disabilities by enabling them to access services in the EU.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi bila evropska kartica mobilnosti konkretno in učinkovito orodje za spodbujanje prostega gibanja invalidov, ki bi jim omogočila dostop do storitev v EU.
1.7 The EESC believes that a European Mobility Card would be a concrete and effective tool to promote the freedom of movement for persons with disabilities by enabling them to access services in the EU.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi bila evropska kartica mobilnosti konkretno in učinkovito sredstvo za spodbujanje prostega gibanja invalidov, ki bi jim omogočila dostop do storitev v EU.
1.7 The EESC believes that abstracts of standards should be made available free of charge to any interested party, including SMEs.
1.7 EESO se strinja s tem, da se povzetki standardov vsem zainteresiranim, zlasti MSP, dajo na voljo brezplačno.
1.7 The EESC believes that an integrated regulatory frame of reference is needed, as well as a system of governance, with the aim of providing clear and reliable answers to the emerging needs, particularly as regards common classification methods, metrology and testing, validation of existing protocols, new protocols, and pre-normative and co-normative research.
1.7 EESO meni, da sta potrebna celosten regulativni referenčni okvir in sistem upravljanja (governance) s ciljem, da se zagotovijo jasni in zanesljivi odgovori na nastajajoče potrebe, predvsem pri skupnih metodah klasificiranja, metrologiji in preverjanju potrjevanja obstoječih in novih protokolov ter predregulativnih in soregulativnih raziskav.
1.7 The EESC believes that before any decision is taken about the Customs Union text under review, its impact and effects since 1995 must be assessed with respect to every sphere, not just the economy, with the involvement of the social partners and civil society organisations.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi bilo treba pred sprejetjem kakršnekoli odločitve o obravnavanem besedilu o carinski uniji oceniti učinek in posledice carinske unije po letu 1995, na vse sfere, ne le na gospodarstvo, pri tem pa bi morali sodelovati socialni partnerji in organizacije civilne družbe.
1.7 The EESC believes that close cooperation and information sharing, which the communication calls for between operators, vendors, regulators and European institutions, are important and should be extended to the public and to staff and their representatives, particularly in border areas where procedures need to be harmonised.
1.7 Za EESO je tesno sodelovanje in deljenje informacij med upravljavci, prodajalci, nacionalnimi regulatorji in evropskimi institucijami, kot je priporočeno v sporočilu, pomembno in meni, da bi ga bilo treba razširiti na prebivalstvo ter osebje in njihove predstavnike, zlasti na mejnih območjih, kjer je treba uskladiti postopke.
1.7 The EESC believes that Community budget financing should be reviewed in line with Treaty Article 2692.
1.7 EESO ugotavlja, da je treba pregledati financiranje proračuna EU v skladu s členom 269 Pogodbe2.
1.7 The EESC believes that duly updated fishing rights could help cut down overfishing and discards at sea substantially.
1.7 Po mnenju Odbora bi lahko s pomočjo ustrezno ažuriranih ribolovnih pravic precej zmanjšali prelov in zavržke na morju.
1.7 The EESC believes that EU policy should facilitate the transition of industry to more innovative products and related services, which are strategically relevant due to their impact on the CO2 emissions and energy consumption, such as solar panels, photovoltaic units, heat pumps, hydrogen cells, microgeneration units and high performance air conditioning devices.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi morala politika EU olajšati prehod industrije k inovativnejšim izdelkom in sorodnim storitvam, ki so strateškega pomena zaradi njihovega vpliva na emisije CO2 in porabo energije, na primer sončni kolektorji, fotovoltaične naprave, toplotne črpalke, vodikove celice, naprave za mikrosoproizvodnjo in visokozmogljive klimatske naprave.
1.7 The EESC believes that fiscal responsibility is needed from all Member States and it should be directly linked with employment promotion and social accountability.
1.7 EESO verjame, da je potrebna fiskalna disciplina vseh držav članic, ki jo je treba neposredno povezovati s spodbujanjem zaposlovanja in družbene odgovornosti.
1.7 The EESC believes that greater emphasis should be placed on data collection at European level for a better understanding of the industry.
1.7 EESO meni, da je treba več pozornosti nameniti zbiranju podatkov na evropski ravni, da se izboljša poznavanje sektorja.
1.7 The EESC believes that if the Commission finds that a rights-based management system in fisheries is necessary, then this should be at Community level.
1.7 EESO meni, da mora biti v primeru, da Komisija ugotovi, da je potreben sistem za upravljanje ribištva na podlagi pravic, tak sistem določen na ravni Skupnosti.
1.7 The EESC believes that in order to respond to the expectations of Europeans, a consistent and holistic approach needs to be taken to the issue of energy, involving cooperation between States and an efficient internal energy market.
1.7 EESO meni, da je za odziv na pričakovanja Evropejcev potreben skladen in celovit pristop k obravnavi vprašanja energije, ki bo vključeval sodelovanje med državami in učinkovit notranji energetski trg.
1.7 The EESC believes that interlinking maritime surveillance systems presupposes thorough consideration of diverse legal issues related to the exchange of information collected for different purposes and from different sources.
1.7 EESO meni, da je za povezovanje sistemov pomorskega nadzora potreben temeljit razmislek o različnih pravnih vprašanjih, povezanih z izmenjavo informacij, zbranih v različne namene in iz različnih virov.
1.7 The EESC believes that it is essential to encourage joint European and international endeavours to draw up clear, universally accepted technical standards to promote global trade in this sector, with the aim of increasingly reconciling EU emission limits and those applied or planned in third countries.
1.7 EESO ocenjuje, da je spodbujanje skupnih prizadevanj na evropski in mednarodni ravni za pripravo enotnih in splošno sprejetih tehničnih standardov temeljnega pomena za spodbujanje svetovne trgovine v tem sektorju in za vse večje usklajevanje mejnih vrednosti za emisije, ki veljajo v EU, z vrednostmi, ki veljajo ali so predvidene v tretjih državah.
1.7 The EESC believes that it is necessary to create a European single market for engineering and develop a common, multidimensional approach for increased mobility throughout the European Union, given the importance of mutual recognition, in particular for independent self-employed engineers.
1.7 EESO meni, da je treba ustvariti enotni trg evropskih inženirjev ter razviti vsestranski skupni pristop s ciljem povečanja mobilnosti v celotnem evropskem prostoru, pri čemer je medsebojno priznavanje zelo pomembno, zlasti za samostojne in neodvisne inženirje.
1.7 The EESC believes that Monitoring Committees should be supplemented by other partnership instruments.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi morali odbore za spremljanje nadomestiti drugi instrumenti partnerstva.
1.7 The EESC believes that policing and security are very important to the progress and prosperity of the Adriatic and Ionian region and calls on the Council to increase FRONTEX's budget and power to act5.
1.7 EESO je prepričan, da sta policijsko nadzorovanje in varnost zelo pomembna za napredek in blaginjo jadransko-jonske regije, ter Svet poziva, naj poveča proračun agencije FRONTEX in njena pooblastila za ukrepanje5.
1.7 The EESC believes that prompt approval by the Council of the Adriatic-Ionian Strategy (see Council Conclusions of 24 June 2011) will open the way for establishing a macro-regional strategy for the Mediterranean.
1.7 Po mnenju EESO bo takojšnje sprejetje Jadransko-jonske strategije v Svetu (Sklepi Sveta z dne 24. junija 2011) odprlo pot uvedbi makroregionalne strategije za Sredozemlje.
1.7 The EESC believes that the alternative emission reduction methods or the possible use of alternative fuels need to be further researched and improved.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi bilo treba alternativne metode za zmanjševanje emisij ali možno uporabo alternativnih goriv dodatno raziskati in izboljšati.
1.7 The EESC believes that the Atlantic Forum provided for by the Atlantic maritime strategy is a first step towards transforming the Atlantic maritime strategy into a macro-regional Atlantic strategy.
1.7 EESO meni, da je atlantski forum, predviden v atlantski pomorski strategiji, prvi korak k preoblikovanju atlantske pomorske strategije v makroregionalno strategijo.
1.7 The EESC believes that the Commission should expressly provide for Member State funding of observer-at-sea schemes and that self-sampling programmes, which would be carried out by crew members, are kept to the absolute minimum, because they could result in an excessively heavy workload.
1.7 EESO meni, da mora Komisija izrecno določiti, da se opazovalni programi financirajo preko držav članic in da se programi vzorčenja, ki jih izvaja posadka sama in ki lahko povzročijo prekomerno obremenitev dela, omejijo na najnujnejše.
1.7 The EESC believes that the EU support under the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) should be accessible and responsive to the sudden needs of a broader range of civil society organisations, including non-registered opposition groups.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi morala biti pomoč, ki jo EU nudi prek Evropske ustanove za demokracijo, dostopna, prav tako pa bi morala omogočati odzivanje na nenadne potrebe širokega spektra organizacij civilne družbe, vključno z neregistriranimi opozicijskimi skupinami.
1.7 The EESC believes that the EU's ability to present a united front on energy efficiency in international relations needs to be strengthened.
1.7 Odbor meni, da je treba okrepiti sposobnost Unije, da v mednarodnih odnosih na področju energetske učinkovitosti nastopa enotno.
1.7 The EESC believes that the inclusion of self-employed drivers in the scope of the directive must not result in them being burdened with unnecessary administrative tasks.
1.7 Odbor meni, da vključitev samozaposlenih voznikov v področje uporabe direktive voznikov ne sme obremeniti z odvečnimi upravnimi nalogami.
1.7 The EESC believes that the instrument of a regulation can reduce the danger of different interpretations at national level, thus promoting the establishment of a capital markets union.
1.7 EESO meni, da je z uporabo uredbe mogoče omejiti nevarnost različnih tolmačenj na nacionalni ravni in spodbuditi ustvarjanje unije kapitalskih trgov.
1.7 The EESC believes that the main issue is not so much ownership of stocks, which could have very heavy financial consequences, at least for some EU Member States, as control, which must be extremely strict, public and preferably managed at European level.
1.7 EESO meni, da glavno vprašanje ni toliko povezano z lastništvom zalog, ki bi lahko vsaj za nekatere države članice EU pomenilo velike finančne posledice, temveč nadzor, ki mora biti izjemno strog, javen in po možnosti voden na evropski ravni.
1.7 The EESC believes that the main issue is not so much ownership of stocks, which could have very heavy financial consequences, at least for some EU Member States, as control, which must be extremely strict, public and preferably managed at European level.
1.7 EESO meni, da glavno vprašanje ni toliko povezano z lastništvom zalog, ki bi lahko vsaj za nekatere države članice EU pomenilo velike finančne posledice, temveč z njihovim nadzorom, ki mora biti izjemno strog, javen in po možnosti voden na evropski ravni.
1.7 The EESC believes that the monitoring of fishing vessels from third countries should be carried out uniformly in all "designated ports" across the various Member States.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi se moral nadzor ribiških plovil tretjih držav izvajati podobno v vseh "določenih pristaniščih" v različnih državah članicah.