natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3.2.1 The current predictions envisage Four Main Trajectories for this Next Generation of Reduced Power-Consumption ICT Systems - specially developed to answer at the same time to the present challenges of the sector - that are:
3.2.1 Sedanje napovedi kažejo na štiri glavne smeri razvoja te nove generacije energetsko varčnejših sistemov IKT, ki so bili razviti kot odgovor na izzive, s katerimi se danes sooča ta sektor:
3.2.1 The current predictions envisage four main trajectories for this next generation of reduced power-consumption ICT systems, specially developed to answer the challenges now confronting the sector:
3.2.1 Sedanje napovedi kažejo na štiri glavne smeri razvoja te nove generacije energetsko varčnejših sistemov IKT, ki so bili posebej razviti kot odgovor na izzive, s katerimi se danes sooča ta sektor:
3.2.1 The Danish flexicurity system helps ensure that the jobs that are created are of a high calibre and involve decent work.
3.2.1 Danski sistem fleksivarnosti prispeva k ustvarjanju dostojnih, tj. kakovostnih delovnih mest.
3.2.1 The development of telemedicine is a lever for standardising the collegial practices of medical practitioners and the organisation of healthcare via networks, as well as a means of improving the quality and accessibility of healthcare.
3.2.1 Razvoj telemedicine je vzvod za razširjanje kolegialne prakse zdravstvenih delavcev in organizacij prek omrežij, zato je tudi sredstvo izboljšanja kakovosti in dostopnosti zdravstvene oskrbe.
3.2.1 The development of telemedicine is a lever for standardising the collegial practices of medical practitioners and the organisation of healthcare via networks, as well as a means of improving the quality and accessibility of healthcare.
3.2.1 Razvoj telemedicine je vzvod za razširjanje sodelovanja zdravstvenih delavcev in organizacijo služb zdravstvene oskrbe prek omrežij ter tudi sredstvo izboljšanja kakovosti in dostopnosti zdravstvene oskrbe.
3.2.1 The digital society demands a commitment to openness to institutional changes.
3.2.1 Digitalna družba zahteva večjo odprtost do institucionalnih sprememb.
3.2.1 The Directive on renewable energy in transport (Directive 2003/30/EC) required Member States to set targets for the share of renewable energy replacing petrol and diesel in transport in 2005 and 2010, taking as their starting point reference values of 2% and 5.75% respectively.
3.2.1 V skladu z direktivo o energiji iz obnovljivih virov v prometu (Direktiva 2003/30/ES) morajo države članice določiti ciljni delež energije iz obnovljivih virov, ki bo do leta 2005 in 2010 nadomestila motorni bencin in dizelskego gorivo v prometu, pri čemer za izhodiščno točko šteje referenčna vrednost v višini 2 % oziroma 5,75 %.
3.2.1 The Directive on renewable energy in transport (Directive 2003/30/EC) required Member States to set targets for the share of renewable energy replacing petrol and diesel in transport in 2005 and 2010, taking as their starting point reference values of 2% and 5.75% respectively.
3.2.1 V skladu z direktivo o energiji iz obnovljivih virov v prometu (Direktiva 2003/30/ES) morajo države članice določiti ciljni delež energije iz obnovljivih virov, ki bo do leta 2005 in 2010 nadomestila motorni bencin in dizelsko gorivo v prometu, pri čemer za izhodiščno točko šteje referenčna vrednost v višini 2 % oziroma 5,75 %.
3.2.1 The directive should be considered alongside other legislation on the noise emission of certain categories of machinery:
3.2.1 Dejansko je direktiva v zvezi z naslednjimi pravnimi predpisi, ki zadevajo akustične emisije nekaterih kategorij strojev:
3.2.1 The draft directive simplifies the TSIs for HS and traditional systems when they are comparable.
3.2.1 Predlog direktive poenostavlja TSI za visoke hitrosti in konvencionalne sisteme, kadar so primerljivi.
3.2.1 The EC has not put in place an EU non-discrimination and equality strategy for PWDs which complies with the UN CRPD provisions and the COs, therefore the EESC calls on the EC to take immediate action regarding the horizontal equal treatment directive (see point 2.2) and also proceed to a review of the employment equal treatment directive 2000/78/EC.
3.2.1 Evropska komisija še ni oblikovala strategije EU o nediskriminaciji in enakosti za invalide v skladu z določbami Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov in sklepnimi ugotovitvami, zato EESO poziva Evropsko komisijo k takojšnjemu ukrepanju v zvezi s horizontalno direktivo o enakem obravnavanju (glej točko 2.2) in pregledu direktive o enakem obravnavanju pri zaposlovanju in delu (2000/78/ES).
3.2.1 The EC has not put in place an EU non-discrimination and equality strategy for PWDs which complies with the UN CRPD provisions and the COs, therefore the EESC calls on the EC to take immediate action regarding the horizontal equal treatment directive (see point 2.2) and also proceed to a review of the employment equal treatment directive 2000/78/EC.
3.2.1 Evropska komisija še ni oblikovala strategije EU o nediskriminaciji in enakosti za invalide v skladu z določbami Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov in sklepnimi ugotovitvami, zato jo EESO poziva k takojšnjemu ukrepanju v zvezi s horizontalno direktivo o enakem obravnavanju (glej točko 2.2) in k pregledu direktive o enakem obravnavanju pri zaposlovanju in delu (2000/78/ES).
3.2.1 The EC has not put in place an EU non-discrimination and equality strategy for PWDs which complies with the UN CRPD provisions and the COs, therefore the EESC calls on the EC to take immediate action regarding the horizontal equal treatment directive (see point 2.2) and also proceed to a review of the employment equal treatment directive 2000/78/EC.
3.2.1 Evropska komisija še ni oblikovala strategije EU o nediskriminaciji in enakosti za invalide v skladu z določbami Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov in sklepnimi ugotovitvami, zato jo EESO poziva k takojšnjemu ukrepanju v zvezi s horizontalno direktivo o enakem obravnavanju (glej točko 2.2) in k pregledu direktive o enakem obravnavanju pri zaposlovanju in delu (2000/78/ES).
3.2.1 The EESC acknowledges the Commission's efforts in bilateral or multilateral negotiations to reach agreement on capacity reduction and transparency concerning State aids.
3.2.1 EESO priznava prizadevanja Komisije v dvostranskih ali večstranskih pogajanjih za sklenitev sporazuma o zmanjšanju zmogljivosti in o preglednosti državne pomoči.
3.2.1 The EESC acknowledges the Commission's efforts in bilateral or multilateral negotiations to reach agreement on capacity reduction and transparency concerning State aids.
3.2.1 EESO priznava prizadevanja Komisije v dvostranskih ali večstranskih pogajanjih za sklenitev sporazuma o zmanjšanju zmogljivosti in o preglednosti državnih pomoči.
3.2.1 The EESC agrees with the overall objectives of Commission policy over the next five years and with the proposed key political orientation.
3.2.1 EESO se strinja s splošnimi cilji politike Komisije za naslednjih pet let in s predloženo temeljno politično usmeritvijo.
3.2.1 The EESC also notes that there is frequently a concentration of enterprises in the energy sector and points out that this does not always chime with the need for a rapid introduction of innovatory techniques and procedures.
3.2.1 Odbor hkrati ugotavlja, da kopičenje podjetij, ki je na področju energije pogosto, ni vedno najbolj primerno za hitro uvajanje inovativnih tehnik in postopkov.
3.2.1 The EESC also notes that there is frequently a concentration of enterprises in the energy sector and points out that this does not always chime with the need for a rapid introduction of innovatory techniques and procedures.
3.2.1 Odbor hkrati ugotavlja, da kopičenje podjetij, ki je pogosto na področju energije, ni vedno najbolj primerno za hitro uvajanje inovativnih tehnik in postopkov.
3.2.1 The EESC believes that high levels of engineering training and qualifications are a prerequisite for an effective mutual recognition system: lowering educational standards in order to preserve mobility might be likely to reduce mutual confidence in a knowledge-based EU that can address new engineering challenges.
3.2.1 EESO meni, da je visoka raven izobraževanja in usposabljanja na področju inženirstva temelj za učinkovit sistem medsebojnega priznavanja: z zniževanjem standardov izobraževanja zaradi povečanja mobilnosti bi ogrozili vzajemno zaupanje v EU, ki temelji na znanju in se je sposobna soočati z novimi izzivi inženirstva.
3.2.1 The EESC believes that high levels of engineering training and qualifications are a prerequisite for an effective mutual recognition system: lowering educational standards in order to preserve mobility might be likely to reduce mutual confidence in a knowledge-based EU that can address new engineering challenges.
3.2.1 EESO meni, da je visoka raven izobraževanja in usposabljanja na področju inženirstva temelj za učinkovit sistem medsebojnega priznavanja: z zniževanjem standardov izobraževanja, da bi povečali mobilnost, bi ogrozili vzajemno zaupanje v EU, ki temelji na znanju in se je sposobna soočati z novimi izzivi inženirstva.
3.2.1 The EESC believes that the Commission should clarify the legal basis for these measures at this stage and, more specifically, whether they are solely intended to support the completion of the internal market or for other purposes.
3.2.1 EESO meni, da bi morala Komisija v tej fazi pojasniti pravno podlago za te ukrepe, in še posebej, ali so namenjeni izključno za podporo dokončnega oblikovanja notranjega trga ali za druge namene.
3.2.1 The EESC calls for the terms "microenterprises," "craft enterprises," "self-employed workers" and "the liberal professions" to be added to Article 1.
3.2.1 EESO poziva, da se v člen 1 dodajo tudi izrazi "mikro podjetja", "podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo z obrtniškimi dejavnostmi", "samozaposlene osebe" in "svobodni poklici".
3.2.1 The EESC considers that territorial cohesion underlines the need to ensure synergy between economic and social cohesion.
3.2.1 Po mnenju EESO teritorialna kohezija poudarja nujnost sinergije med ekonomsko in socialno kohezijo.
3.2.1 The EESC considers that the definition given in Article 2(1)(g), tying in with the provisions of Article 7, is too restrictive, because what characterises the ancillary nature of contracts is the complementarity between them.
3.2.1 EESO meni, da je opredelitev iz člena 2(1)(g), v povezavi z določbami člena 7, preveč omejujoča, ker je značilnost pomožnih pogodb njihovo medsebojno dopolnjevanje.
3.2.1 The EESC considers that the term "major refurbishment" needs to be clarified.
3.2.1 EESO meni, da je primerno podrobno pojasniti izraz "večja preureditev".
3.2.1 The EESC considers that the term "major refurbishment" needs to be clarified.
3.2.1 EESO meni, da je treba podrobno pojasniti izraz "večja preureditev".
3.2.1 The EESC deprecates the use of the term "gold-plating" (meaning "overregulation"), since it stigmatises certain national practices and precludes a discriminating and flexible approach.
3.2.1 EESO meni, da se izraz „čezmerno prenašanje“ (gold-plating), ki se nanaša na čezmerno pravno urejanje, ne bi smel uporabljati, saj stigmatizira nekatere nacionalne prakse in ob tem izključuje diferenciran in prilagodljiv pristop.
3.2.1 The EESC emphasises that the current requirements demanding the presentation of an Apostille reflects international procedures and, thus, do not reflect the developments of the EU as a single market.
3.2.1 EESO poudarja, da sedanje zahteve, v skladu s katerimi je potreben žig Apostille, odražajo mednarodne postopke in tako ne upoštevajo razvoja EU kot enotnega trga.
3.2.1 The EESC endorses the EU 2020 document's contents and agrees with the operational approaches it sets out regarding the fact that regeneration policies need to take certain innovative concepts into account:
3.2.1 EESO podpira vsebino dokumenta EU 2020 in se strinja z njegovim operativnim pristopom do tega, da morajo politike za obnovo upoštevati nekatere inovativne koncepte:
3.2.1 The EESC has already expressed its concern (see point 2.2.2) about this discrimination between citizens according to the mode of transport used.
3.2.1 EESO je že izrazil zaskrbljenost (glej točko 2.2.2) zaradi razlikovanja med državljani glede na obliko prevoza, ki jo uporabijo.
3.2.1 The EESC has lauded the creation and development of the internal market in several opinions10.
3.2.1 EESO je v več mnenjih pohvalil vzpostavitev in razvoj notranjega trga10.
3.2.1 The EESC has lauded the creation and development of the internal market in several opinions9.
3.2.1 EESO je v več mnenjih pohvalil vzpostavitev in razvoj notranjega trga9.
3.2.1 The EESC has pointed out previously that the main objective of corporate governance is to ensure that the company survives and thrives1 by establishing the conditions for trust between the various actors.
3.2.1 EESO je že imel možnost opozoriti, da je cilj upravljanja podjetij zagotoviti, da podjetje preživi in uspešno deluje1, hkrati pa je treba vzpostaviti zaupanje med različnimi akterji.
3.2.1 The EESC is aware that, on the employment front, significant disparities remain between disabled and non-disabled people.
3.2.1 EESO se zaveda, da so na področju zaposlovanja še vedno ogromne neenakosti med invalidi in neinvalidi.
3.2.1 The EESC is pleased that more and more EU countries have – in view of the dramatic employment situation and the difficulties faced by many companies – implemented publicly subsidised active employment policy instruments, enabling employees to be kept on and engage in further training instead of being laid off (short-term employment is the watchword here).
3.2.1 EESO pozdravlja dejstvo, da je vedno več držav članic EU zaradi dramatične situacije na trgu dela in težkega položaja mnogih podjetij uporabilo instrumente aktivne politike trga dela, ki se financirajo z javnimi sredstvi, s čimer želijo omogočiti, da delavci obdržijo zaposlitev v podjetju in se naprej usposabljajo (ključna beseda je zaposlitev s skrajšanim delovnim časom).
3.2.1 The EESC is pleased that more and more EU countries have – in view of the dramatic employment situation and the difficulties faced by many companies – implemented publicly subsidised active employment policy instruments, enabling employees to be kept on and engage in further training instead of being laid off (short-term employment is the watchword here).
3.2.1 EESO pozdravlja dejstvo, da je vse več držav članic EU zaradi dramatične situacije na trgu dela in težkega položaja mnogih podjetij uporabilo instrumente aktivne politike trga dela, ki se financirajo z javnimi sredstvi, s katerimi želijo omogočiti, da delavci obdržijo zaposlitev v podjetju, hkrati pa se dodatno usposabljajo (tj. zaposlitev s skrajšanim delovnim časom).
3.2.1 The EESC recognises the various forms and traditions of civic service and other forms of voluntary activity in the Member States, which aims at active citizenship, solidarity and social development.
3.2.1 EESO se zaveda, da v državah članicah obstajajo različne oblike in tradicije opravljanja civilne službe in druge oblike prostovoljnih dejavnosti, namenjene spodbujanju aktivnega državljanstva, solidarnosti in družbenega razvoja.
3.2.1 The EESC recommends that the European Commission should develop an integrated strategy for research and innovation taking additional structural measures within the Commission and the consultative bodies that support it, as well as to finally raise the future budget for research and innovation.
3.2.1 EESO priporoča, da Evropska komisija razvije celostno strategijo za raziskave in inovacije in v ta namen izpelje dopolnilne strukturne ukrepe v lastni instituciji in v posvetovalnih organih, ki jo podpirajo, ter končno poviša prihodnji proračun za raziskave in inovacije.
3.2.1 The EESC regrets that, since the ratification of the UN CRPD, the EU has still not undertaken a comprehensive review of EU legislation and policy.
3.2.1 EESO obžaluje, da Evropska unija od ratifikacije Konvencije ZN še vedno ni izvedla celovitega pregleda zakonodaje in politik EU.
3.2.1 The EESC regrets that, since the ratification of the UN CRPD, the EU has still not undertaken a comprehensive review of EU legislation and policy.
3.2.1 EESO obžaluje, da od ratifikacije Konvencije ZN EU še vedno ni izvedla celovitega pregleda zakonodaje in politik EU.
3.2.1 The EESC reiterates its support for a general state aid framework based on the following principles3:
3.2.1 EESO ponovno izraža podporo splošnemu okviru za državne pomoči, ki temelji na naslednjih merilih3:
3.2.1 The EESC sees this as a considerable slackening in European efforts and doubts whether almost exclusively shifting responsibility for framing concrete employment initiatives to the Member States in this way will strengthen commitment in meeting joint targets.
3.2.1 EESO v tem vidi opazno šibko točko evropskega pristopa in dvomi, da bo s tem skoraj izključnim prenosom oblikovanja konkretnih ciljev politike zaposlovanja na raven držav članic izpolnjevanje skupnih ciljnih obveznosti postalo bolj obvezujoče.
3.2.1 The EESC shares the view that the criteria and standards applying in each institution for developing internal quality assessment methods must be rooted in the framework in which the institution itself operates.
3.2.1 EESC se strinja s stališčem, da morajo biti merila in standardi, ki jih uporabljajo institucije za razvoj notranjih metod  za ocenjevanje kakovosti, vgrajeni v okvir delovanja takih institucij.
3.2.1 The EESC shares the view that the criteria and standards applying in each institution for developing internal quality assessment methods must be rooted in the framework in which the institution itself operates.
3.2.1 EESO se strinja s stališčem, da morajo biti merila in standardi, ki jih uporabljajo institucije za razvoj notranjih metod  za ocenjevanje kakovosti, vgrajeni v okvir delovanja takih institucij.
3.2.1 The EESC supports the choice of the country of destination principle, thus creating a level playing field for all suppliers on the same national market, regardless of where they are based.
3.2.1 EESO podpira odločitev za načelo namembne države, s katerim se ustvarijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji za vse dobavitelje na istem nacionalnem trgu, ne glede na to, kje imajo sedež.
3.2.1 The EESC supports the Commission in using the current, post 2010, data on supply – and, broadly speaking, on demand, however all must be regarded as "indicative" rather than "accurate".
3.2.1 EESO podpira Komisijo pri uporabi tekočih podatkov (tj. po letu 2010) o ponudbi in na splošno tudi o povpraševanju, vendar jih je treba obravnavati kot "okvirne" in ne toliko "natančne".
3.2.1 The EESC supports the proposal, although it considers that the temporary ban on placing on the market of food from animal clones will, in due time, need to be reviewed to take into account improvements in the technique, scientific progress, the international environment and the need for the sectors involved to be competitive.
3.2.1 EESO podpira predlog direktive, čeprav meni, da bo potrebna revizija začasne prepovedi dajanja živil iz živalskih klonov na trg ob upoštevanju izboljšav tehnologije ter napredka znanosti, mednarodnih razmer in konkurenčnosti vpletenih panog.
3.2.1 The EESC therefore acknowledges the role of IAs7 as a key element of SME policy making at EU level.
3.2.1 EESO zato priznava vlogo ocene učinka7 kot ključnega elementa oblikovanja politik glede MSP na ravni EU.
3.2.1 The EESC was pleased to note that the Commission's quality policy consultations were very wide-ranging and enabled all stakeholders to participate in the setting of strategic guidelines on further development.
3.2.1 EESO z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da so bila posvetovanja Komisije o politiki kakovosti obširna in so vsem zainteresiranim stranem omogočila sodelovanje pri oblikovanju strateških smernic o prihodnjem razvoju.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the 2012 report, which gives details of the work carried out in a key EU policy area.
3.2.1 EESO pozitivno ocenjuje poročilo za leto 2012, ki podrobno opisuje delo, opravljeno na ključnem področju politike EU.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the fact that the European Commission draws here on information from a number of national competition authorities.
3.2.1 EESO izraža zadovoljstvo, da je Evropska komisija v tem poglavju uporabila informacije številnih nacionalnih organov za konkurenco.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the fact that the European Commission draws here on information from a number of national competition authorities.
3.2.1 EESO izraža zadovoljstvo, da je Evropska komisija v tem primeru uporabila informacije številnih nacionalnih organov za konkurenco.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the increasing importance of the maritime dimension of Europe in the Green Paper, which turns a new page in the EU regarding the sea.
3.2.1 Odbor pozdravlja večji pomen pomorske identitete Evrope, s čimer se v EU začenja novo poglavje v zvezi z morji.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the increasing importance of the maritime dimension of Europe in the Green Paper, which turns a new page in the EU regarding the sea.
3.2.1 Odbor pozdravlja večji pomen pomorske identitete Evrope, s čimer se začenja v zvezi z morji novo poglavje v EU.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the proposal, taking note of the insufficient technical and scientific knowledge available, the problems relating to animal welfare and the opposition of the public and of consumer organisations, although it considers that the temporary ban on the placing on the market of food from animal clones will need to be reviewed to take into account improvements in the technique, scientific progress, the international environment and the need for the sectors involved to be competitive.
3.2.1 EESO podpira predlog direktive, vendar se zaveda pomanjkljivih tehnično-znanstvenih spoznanj, ki so na voljo, problemov, povezanih z dobrobitjo živali, in nasprotovanja državljanov in potrošnikov, in meni, da bo potrebna revizija začasne prepovedi dajanja hrane iz živalskih klonov na trg ob upoštevanju izboljšav tehnologije ter napredka znanosti, mednarodnih razmer in konkurenčnosti vpletenih panog.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the proposed CPR outlining a common set of rules applicable to the SFs; this will bring EU common perspective and more coherence and effectiveness to the cohesion policy in the EU.
3.2.1 EESO odobrava, da predlagana uredba o skupnih določbah določa skupen niz pravil, ki naj veljajo za strukturne sklade; to bo v kohezijsko politiko EU vneslo skupno perspektivo EU ter več koherentnosti in učinkovitosti.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the proposed general regulation outlining a common set of rules applicable to the SFs; this will bring EU common perspective and more coherence and effectiveness to the cohesion policy in the EU.
3.2.1 EESO odobrava, da predlagana splošna uredba določa skupen niz pravil, ki naj veljajo za strukturne sklade; to bo v kohezijsko politiko EU vneslo skupno perspektivo EU ter več koherentnosti in učinkovitosti.
3.2.1 The EESC welcomes the quality of the measures already introduced and envisaged for making road transport environmentally sustainable.
3.2.1 EESO pozdravlja kakovost sprejetih in predvidenih ukrepov, s pomočjo katerih naj bi cestni promet postal okoljsko trajnosten.
3.2.1 The EESC wishes to emphasise the particularly positive development represented by the inclusion of SME tests in impact analyses, which now include social and environmental impacts in their assessments.
3.2.1 EESO poudarja, da je vključitev "testa MSP" v ocene učinka, ki bodo odslej upoštevale tudi socialne in okoljske vplive, izredno pozitiven razvoj.
3.2.1 The EESC would like to strongly emphasise that operational programmes (including those financed from the ESF and therefore financing the YEI) should be geared towards "partnership-friendly" actions and measures.
3.2.1 EESO želi izrecno poudariti, da bi morali biti operativni programi (tudi tisti, ki se financirajo iz ESS in s tem financirajo pobudo za zaposlovanje mladih) usmerjeni k dejavnostim in ukrepom, ki so "partnerstvu prijazni".
3.2.1 The EU and Russia are expanding and deepening their relations on the basis of the action plans for the four Common Spaces.
3.2.1 Evropska unija in Rusija širita in poglabljata svoje sodelovanje na podlagi akcijskih načrtov za štiri skupna področja.