natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1.7 The Committee advocates the launch of an integrated and inclusive platform of EU-ASEAN social organisations to support key themes in the inter-regional integration process, as well as to support the capacity building of organisations that represent the needs of local civil society, especially in countries where such organisations are weaker.
1.7 Odbor predlaga uvedbo povezane in vključujoče platforme družbenih organizacij EU-ASEAN v podporo ključnim temam procesa povezovanja različnih območij sveta in  utrjevanju organizacij, ki zastopajo potrebe lokalne civilne družbe, zlasti v državah, kjer so te organizacije šibkejše.
1.7 The Committee advocates the launch of an integrated and inclusive platform of EU-ASEAN social organisations to support key themes in the inter-regional integration process, as well as to support the capacity building of organisations that represent the needs of local civil society, especially in countries where such organisations are weaker.
1.7 Odbor predlaga uvedbo povezane in vključujoče platforme družbenih organizacij EU-ASEAN v podporo ključnim temam procesa povezovanja različnih območij sveta in utrjevanju organizacij, ki zastopajo potrebe lokalne civilne družbe, zlasti v državah, kjer so te organizacije šibkejše.
1.7 The Committee advocates the launch of an integrated and inclusive platform of EU‑ASEAN social organisations to support key themes in the inter-regional integration process, as well as to support the capacity building of organisations that represent the needs of local civil society, especially in countries where such organisations are weaker.
1.7 Odbor predlaga uvedbo povezane in vključujoče platforme družbenih organizacij EU-ASEAN v podporo ključnim temam procesa povezovanja različnih območij sveta in utrjevanju organizacij, ki zastopajo potrebe lokalne civilne družbe, zlasti v državah, kjer so te organizacije šibkejše.
1.7 The Committee agrees in principle with the four-pillar approach proposed in the Directive:
1.7 Odbor se načeloma strinja s pristopom na podlagi štirih stebrov, ki je predlagan v direktivi:
1.7 The Committee agrees that a regulation is the appropriate legal instrument as it will ensure immediate compliance and thus prevent any distortions of competition.
1.7 Odbor pozdravlja izbrani zakonodajni instrument – uredbo, saj lahko ta zagotovi takojšnje izpolnjevanje predpisov, ki bodo sprejeti, in tako preprečuje izkrivljanje konkurence.
1.7 The Committee agrees that a regulation is the appropriate legal instrument as it will ensure immediate compliance and thus prevent any distortions of competition.
1.7 Odbor pozdravlja izbrani zakonodajni instrument – uredbo, saj lahko zagotovi takojšnje izpolnjevanje predpisov, ki bodo sprejeti, in tako preprečuje izkrivljanje konkurence.
1.7 The Committee agrees with the Commission on the measures set out in Sheets 3, 4 and 5 to simplify the process of data input and management and to make monitoring measures more effective.
1.7 Odbor se strinja s Komisijo glede ukrepov, predvidenih v POVZETKIH 3, 4 in 5 za poenostavitev procesa zbiranja in upravljanja podatkov in za večjo učinkovitost ukrepov.
1.7 The Committee also calls for clear prioritisation of objectives, with precedence for LPT, walking and cycling over car infrastructure.
1.7 Odbor poleg tega zahteva jasno hierarhijo ciljev in dajanje prednosti lokalnemu javnemu potniškemu prometu – pa tudi kolesarjenju in pešačenju – v primerjavi z infrastrukturo za motorna vozila.
1.7 The Committee also calls on the heads of state or government and on European industry, including through their national research programmes and industrial research measures, to help ensure that the 3% target is reached as soon as possible.
1.7 Odbor poziva tudi voditelje držav in vlad ter evropsko industrijo, da s svojimi nacionalnimi raziskovalnimi programi in ukrepi za industrijsko raziskovanje prispevajo k čimprejšnji uresničitvi cilja 3 %.
1.7 The Committee also deplores the fact that the proposal for a Regulation contains no reference to the objective of sustainable development, although the Commission highlights this objective as a key element of its Trade for All Communication, and although it has stated on several occasions that it will take account of sustainable development in all relevant areas of free trade agreements (energy, raw materials and public procurement)1.
1.7 Odbor obžaluje, da predlog uredbe sploh ne omenja cilja trajnostnega razvoja, čeprav je Komisija ta cilj vnesla kot pomemben element v svoje sporočilo „Trgovina za vse“ in večkrat napovedala, da bo trajnostni razvoj upoštevala v vseh pomembnih svežnjih sporazumov o prosti trgovini (kot so energija, surovine in javna naročila)1.
1.7 The Committee also notes that applying Joint Programming to crossborder science and research will be immensely demanding, since it will require a shift in thinking towards greater openness and cooperation3, which is more easily said than done.
1.7 Odbor ugotavlja tudi, da bo izvajanje skupnega načrtovanja čezmejnih raziskovalnih in razvojnih dejavnosti izjemno težavno, ker bo potrebna nova, bolj odprta miselnost in večja pripravljenost za sodelovanje3; taka sprememba mišljenja pa ni lahka naloga.
1.7 The Committee also notes the importance of analysing the causes of road traffic accidents.
1.7 Odbor tudi opozarja na pomen analize vzrokov za nesreče na cestah.
1.7 The Committee also notes the importance of analysing the causes of road traffic accidents.
1.7 Odbor tudi vztraja pri pomenu analize vzrokov za nesreče na cestah.
1.7 The Committee also recommends that greater consideration be given to how to achieve more effective implementation of Progress and more strategic planning and more targeted measures; we also need to ask in which areas and in relation to which measures savings can be made, without undermining the objectives and strategic thrust of the programme over the remainder of its life.
1.7 Odbor tudi priporoča, da se natančneje razčleni, kako doseči učinkovitejše izvajanje programa Progress ter bolj strateško načrtovanje in bolj usmerjene ukrepe, ter na katerih področjih in s katerimi ukrepi je mogoče doseči prihranke, ne da bi ogrožali cilje in strateško usmeritev programa v preostalem času izvajanja.
1.7 The Committee also recommends the following practical measures that largely tie in with the Commission communication:
1.7 Kot nadaljnje konkretne korake Odbor pretežno v smislu v skladu s sporočilom Komisije priporoča:
1.7 The Committee also wonders whether the prohibition on Member States applying restrictive measures going beyond those laid down in the Regulation is not equivalent to de facto liberalisation of access for non-EU companies to public procurement below the threshold of EUR 5 000 000, without reciprocal access for EU companies.
1.7 Odbor se tudi sprašuje, ali prepoved, da države članice uporabijo omejevalne ukrepe, ki niso določeni z uredbo, ne pomeni liberalizacije de facto in brez protivrednosti za podjetja iz tretjih držav v primeru javnih naročil, katerih vrednost je nižja od 5 000 000 EUR.
1.7 The Committee appreciates the prompt action taken by the Commission in bringing forward this amending directive.
1.7 Odbor pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija takoj ukrepala in pripravila to spremenjeno direktivo.
1.7 The Committee attaches great importance to the optional nature of the new rules and to guaranteeing freedom to negotiate as regards acceptance of the Common European Sales Law.
1.7 Odbor pripisuje velik pomen izbirni naravi novih predpisov in zagotavljanju svobode pogajanja v zvezi s sprejetjem skupnega evropskega prodajnega prava.
1.7 The Committee backs the measures aimed at improving consumer information and education programmes and capitalising on best practices so as to provide relevant information from independent sources.
1.7 Odbor podpira ukrepe za izboljšanje programov za obveščanje in izobraževanje potrošnikov ter za spodbujanje dobrih praks, s katerimi bi zagotovili ustrezne informacije, ki bi izvirale od neodvisnih virov.
1.7 The Committee believes it important to ensure a harmonised EU regulatory framework for the marketing and manufacturing of construction products in the single European market (EEA).
1.7 EESO meni, da je treba zagotoviti usklajen evropski regulativni okvir za trženje in proizvodnjo gradbenih izdelkov na enotnem evropskem trgu.
1.7 The Committee believes it important to ensure a harmonised EU regulatory framework for the marketing and manufacturing of construction products in the single European market (EEA).
1.7 EESO meni, da je treba zagotoviti usklajen evropski regulativni okvir za trženje in proizvodnjo gradbenih proizvodov na enotnem evropskem trgu.
1.7 The Committee believes it is essential that, at EU level, new and sustainable industrial initiatives be incorporated into the Structural Funds, Community innovation, research and training programmes, and relevant financial instruments.
1.7 Po mnenju Odbora je bistveno, da se nove in trajnostne pobude industrije na ravni EU vključijo v strukturne sklade ter v inovacijske, raziskovalne in izobraževalne programe Skupnosti in ustrezne finančne instrumente.
1.7 The Committee believes that any further initiative on disclosure of information should focus on the information that stakeholders really need which should include a common set of indicators and at the same time should take into consideration the nature of the company and the sector in which it is operating.
1.7 Po mnenju Odbora se bodo morale vse nadaljnje pobude za razkritje informacij osredotočiti na informacije, ki jih deležniki dejansko potrebujejo, med drugim skupni nabor kazalnikov, hkrati pa je treba upoštevati naravo podjetja in sektorja, v katerem deluje.
1.7 The Committee believes that any further initiative on disclosure of information should focus on the information that stakeholders really need.
1.7 Po mnenju Odbora se bodo morale vse nadaljnje pobude za razkritje informacij osredotočiti na dejanske potrebe deležnikov.
1.7 The Committee believes that ENISA can fulfil a very valuable role in contributing to and initiating research projects in the security domain.
1.7 Odbor je prepričan, da lahko agencija ENISA s prispevanjem k raziskovalnim projektom na področju varnosti in z dajanjem pobud zanje ima zelo pomembno vlogo.
1.7 The Committee believes that ENISA can fulfil a very valuable role in contributing to and initiating research projects in the security domain.
1.7 Odbor je prepričan, da lahko agencija ENISA s prispevanjem k raziskovalnim projektom na področju varnosti in z dajanjem pobud zanje odigra zelo pomembno vlogo.
1.7 The Committee believes that existing arrangements for participatory governance and stakeholder involvement at EU level need to be further developed in order to meet these challenges.
1.7 Odbor meni, da je treba obstoječe ureditve za participativno upravljanje in vključenost deležnikov na ravni EU dodatno razviti, da bi lahko obvladali te izzive.
1.7 The Committee believes that local residents, civil society associations and trade unions should be consulted and their views taken into account before the construction of new energy infrastructure.
1.7 EESO meni, da se pri gradnji nove energetske infrastrukture ne sme prezreti posvetovanja s prebivalci območij, kjer naj bi postavili načrtovane objekte, ter združenj, ki zastopajo civilno družbo in sindikate, in upoštevanja mnenj vseh navedenih.
1.7 The Committee believes that more effective cooperation between businesses and public and private employment services will help make in-house training more consistent with the principles of an active employment policy and therefore increase participation in lifelong learning.
1.7 Odbor meni, da bo bolj učinkovito sodelovanje podjetij z javnimi in zasebnimi službami za zaposlovanje vodilo k večji skladnosti usposabljanja v podjetjih z načeli aktivne politike zaposlovanja in s tem tudi k večji udeležbi pri vseživljenjskem izobraževanju.
1.7 The Committee believes that particular attention should be paid to actions at EU, national and regional levels, to education and the ongoing training of human resources and to the dissemination of knowledge.
1.7 Odbor meni, da je treba posebno pozornost posvetiti ukrepom na evropski, nacionalni in regionalni ravni, izobraževanju ter nenehnemu usposabljanju zaposlenih in širjenju znanja.
1.7 The Committee believes that the flexible compliance provisions and the transition period allowed between successive stages are particularly burdensome and demanding for SMEs, given that the costs involved – in the case of both machinery and engines – particularly for RTD and conformity assessment would naturally be significantly higher for a smaller company than for a major industrial group.
1.7 Odbor meni, da so mehanizmi sistema prožnosti, s katerim naj bi olajšali prilagoditve, in roki za prehod z ene na drugo stopnjo zlasti za MSP obremenjujoči in dragi, saj so predvideni stroški za prilagoditev opreme in motorjev – predvsem pa stroški za raziskave in razvoj in za ugotavljanje skladnosti – za manjša podjetja seveda veliko občutnejše breme kot pa za velike industrijske družbe.
1.7 The Committee believes that the proposals in the directive which would lead to benefits in practice should be preserved, in spite of the serious doubts and criticisms expressed.
1.7 Odbor meni, da je treba ohraniti in okrepiti tiste predloge direktive, ki bi omogočili dejanski učinek v praksi, ne glede na resne pomisleke in kritike vsebine direktive.
1.7 The Committee believes that those proposals in the directive which would lead to benefits in practice should be preserved, in spite of the serious doubts and criticisms expressed with regard to aspects of its content.
1.7 Odbor meni, da je treba ohraniti in okrepiti tiste predloge direktive, ki bi omogočili dejanski učinek v praksi, ne glede na resne pomisleke in kritike vsebine direktive.
1.7 The Committee believes that, as in other sectors (e.g. automotive), Member States should pool their efforts to take joint action at European level with a view to enabling the sector to survive the crisis, with temporary short-term measures that take account of the sector's characteristics.
1.7 Odbor meni, da bi si podobno kot v drugih sektorjih (npr. avtomobilskem) države članice morale skupaj prizadevati za skupne ukrepe na evropski ravni, da bi s pomočjo hitrega izvajanja nujnih ukrepov, ki bi upoštevali posebnosti ladjedelništva, tej panogi omogočile preživetje v krizi.
1.7 The Committee believes that, as in other sectors (e.g. automotive), Member States should pool their efforts to take joint action at European level with a view to enabling the sector to survive the crisis, with temporary short-term measures that take account of the sector's characteristics.
1.7 Odbor meni, da bi si – podobno kot v drugih sektorjih (npr. avtomobilskem) – države članice morale prizadevati za skupne ukrepe na evropski ravni, da bi s pomočjo hitrega izvajanja nujnih ukrepov, ki bi upoštevali posebnosti ladjedelništva, tej panogi omogočile preživetje v krizi.
1.7 The Committee believes that, for the five-year period in question, the proposed figure is insufficient to cover the entire European standardisation system and that it should be increased beyond the current 2% threshold in order to ensure that standards can be freely produced and disseminated, thereby enabling it to meet the needs of both the enlarged EU-25 and the EU candidate countries.
1.7 Po mnenju odbora predlagan znesek ne zadošča za financiranje celotnega sistema standardizacije v predvidenem petletnem obdobju in ga je zato treba dvigniti nad sedanji prag 2 %, da se zagotovi svobodno oblikovanje in razširjanje standardov, tako da bodo ustrezali potrebam EU 25 držav članic in morebitnim nadaljnjim širitvam.
1.7 The Committee believes that, for the five-year period in question, the proposed figure is insufficient to cover the entire European standardisation system and that it should be increased beyond the current 2% threshold in order to ensure that standards can be freely produced and disseminated, thereby enabling it to meet the needs of both the enlarged EU-25 and the EU candidate countries.
1.7 Po mnenju Odbora predlagani znesek ne zadošča za financiranje celotnega sistema standardizacije v predvidenem petletnem obdobju in ga je zato treba dvigniti nad sedanji prag 2 %, da se zagotovi svobodno oblikovanje in razširjanje standardov, tako da bodo ustrezali potrebam EU 25 držav članic in morebitnim nadaljnjim širitvam.
1.7 The Committee believes that, when revising sectoral legislation which includes universal service obligations, continuous review is necessary, on the basis of the new provisions of primary law, the changing needs of users and technological and economic change, in cooperation with stakeholders and civil society.
1.7 Odbor vztraja, da je pri reviziji sektorske zakonodaje, ki vsebuje obveznosti zagotavljanja univerzalnih storitev, potrebno neprestano preverjanje na podlagi novih določb primarne zakonodaje, spreminjajočih se potreb uporabnikov ter tehnoloških in ekonomskih sprememb, pri katerem sodelujejo zainteresirane strani in organizirana civilna družba.
1.7 The Committee believes, however, that economic policy coordination alone is not enough – at least for the euro area countries; rather, a genuine common economic policy is needed, as well as coordination of budgetary policy, at least in the first phase.
1.7 Vendar EESO meni, da vsaj za države območja eura ne zadošča zgolj usklajevanje gospodarskih politik, temveč je potrebna resnično skupna gospodarska politika in usklajevanje proračunske politike, vsaj v prvi fazi.
1.7 The Committee believes, however, that it is essential to amend Regulation No 1321/2004/EC in order to ensure the continuity of the Galileo programme and the appropriate transfer of activities from the Galileo Joint Undertaking to the Supervisory Authority, and to provide the best guarantee of completion for the development phase of the Programme once the Joint Undertaking has been wound up.
1.7 Kljub temu pa Odbor meni, da se v Uredbo št. 1321/2004/ES vnesejo spremembe, da bi zagotovili kontinuiteto programa Galileo in primeren prenos dejavnosti skupnega podjetja Galileo na nadzorni organ, ter zato, da se – po prenehanju delovanja skupnega podjetja – kar najbolje zagotovi zaključitev razvojne faze programa.
1.7 The Committee calls for including in the proposed Regulation a legal basis for a pan‑European Injuries Database (IDB), which should be considered as a third pillar of the EU‑market surveillance information exchange system complementary to RAPEX and ICSMS.
1.7 Odbor poziva k temu, da se v predlagano uredbo vključi pravna podlaga za vseevropsko zbirko podatkov o poškodbah, ki bi jo bilo treba obravnavati kot tretji steber sistema za izmenjavo podatkov pri nadzoru trga EU, ki dopolnjuje sistema RAPEX in ICSMS.
1.7 The Committee calls for the export refunds system to be kept on stand-by, bearing in mind that we cannot currently foresee when this safety net will be needed again.
1.7 Odbor meni, da bi moral biti sistem izvoznih nadomestil vedno v pripravljenosti, saj je težko predvideti, kdaj bo ta varnostna mreža spet potrebna.
1.7 The Committee considers it important to stimulate the climate change mitigation potential of the LULUCF sector and increase the visibility of the mitigation efforts of farmers.
1.7 Odbor meni, da je pomembno spodbujati potencial sektorja LULUCF za ublažitev podnebnih sprememb ter povečati prepoznavnost prizadevanj kmetov za ublažitev.
1.7 The Committee considers that drastically curbing access to firearms, ammunition and explosives must be a priority for the Member States and the European institutions.
1.7 Odbor meni, da mora biti drastična omejitev dostopa do strelnega orožja, streliva in eksplozivov prednostna naloga držav članic in evropskih institucij.
1.7 The Committee considers that giving consumers a secure digital environment, including effective control over their personal data and privacy, will make digital markets work to the benefit of users.
1.7 Po mnenju Odbora bodo digitalni trgi delovali v korist uporabnikov, če jim bodo zagotavljali varno digitalno okolje in jim omogočali učinkovit nadzor nad osebnimi podatki in zasebnostjo.
1.7 The Committee considers that more weight should be attached to the indicators collected by RAPEX, which make it possible to monitor the reduction in the number of non-compliant products on the market and improvements in the quality of conformity assessment services provided by notified bodies.
1.7 Po mnenju Odbora je treba dati več pomena kazalnikom, ki jih zbira sistem RAPEX in s katerimi je mogoče spremljati zmanjšanje števila neskladnih proizvodov na trgu ter izboljšanje kakovosti storitev ocene skladnosti, ki jih zagotavljajo priglašeni organi.
1.7 The Committee considers that other problem-solving mechanisms - such as SOLVIT, IMI, the information exchange system in the context of posting workers and EU PILOT - are good opportunities to reduce the Commission's workload when dealing with infringement procedures.
1.7 Odbor meni, da drugi mehanizmi za reševanje problemov – kot so SOLVIT, IMI, sistem izmenjave informacij v okviru napotitve delavcev in EU PILOT – ponujajo dobre možnosti za zmanjšanje delovnih obremenitev Komisije pri izvajanju postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev.
1.7 The Committee considers that the Commission should encourage the Member States and national regulators to promote transparency, information and decision-making, stimulating discussion of the interests at stake – on both the supply- and the demand-side (regulated economic sectors and consumers) – and supporting positive discrimination in favour of organisations that represent the interests of consumers so that they can participate on an equal basis with economic players in regulators' discussion forums and consultative bodies, thus empowering consumer organisations and, through them, consumers themselves.
1.7 Po mnenju EESO bi morala Komisija spodbujati države članice in zakonodajne organe na nacionalni ravni, da se zavzemajo za transparentnost, obveščanje in sprejemanje odločitev s spodbujanjem razprave o interesih, ki so v igri – tako na strani ponudbe kot povpraševanja (zakonsko urejeni gospodarski sektorji in potrošniki), in z dajanjem prednosti organizacijam, ki zastopajo interese potrošnikov, da bodo lahko poleg gospodarskih akterjev enakopravno sodelovale v razpravah na forumih zakonodajnih organov in v posvetovalnih organih, s čimer bi zagotovili večjo moč potrošniških organizacij in s tem samih potrošnikov.
1.7 The Committee considers that the system of traceability, which underpins the European food safety model and which provides information on foodstuffs "from farm to table", should also apply to products from third countries.
1.7 EESO meni, da bi bilo treba sistem sledljivosti, ki je temelj evropskega modela za zdravstveno varnost in zagotavlja informacije o živilu "od kmetije do mize", uporabljati tudi za proizvode iz tretjih držav.
1.7 The Committee considers that with regard to the priority area entitled "reducing the risks associated with securities financing transactions" the communication limits itself to general observations that may reflect a certain reality but omit a number of key circumstances.
1.7 Odbor meni, da je sporočilo na prednostnem področju "zmanjšanja tveganj, povezanih s posli financiranja vrednostnih papirjev" omejeno na splošne ugotovitve, ki sicer res odražajo določeno realnost, vendar pa v njih niso upoštevane trenutne kritične okoliščine.
1.7 The Committee considers that, in the light of the ongoing process of implementing the Safety of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations Directive, the European Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, should organise a system of verification and indicate ways of increasing the financing capacity of economic operators in the sector to cover remedial measures taken in response to accidents.
1.7 Odbor meni, da mora glede na sedanji proces izvajanja direktive o varnosti naftnih in plinskih dejavnosti na morju Evropska komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami pripraviti sistem preverjanja in navesti načine, kako povečati zmogljivost financiranja gospodarskih subjektov v sektorju za kritje popravnih ukrepov po nesrečah.