natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3.3 The EESC notes with regret that the Commission has chosen the instrument of a directive only for the sphere of competition law5.
3.3 EESO izraža obžalovanje, ker je Komisija instrument direktive izbrala izključno za področje zakonodaje o konkurenci5.
3.3 The EESC opinion of 2004 on Improving the implementation of the Lisbon Strategy9 highlighted the need to examine the new opportunities provided by the knowledge-based economy and the importance of the increased expansion of information technologies and innovation processes.
3.3 EESO je v svojem mnenju iz leta 2004 o izboljšanju izvajanja lizbonske strategije9 poudaril potrebo po obravnavi novih priložnosti, ki jih zagotavlja gospodarstvo znanja, ter pomembnost večjega razširjanja informacijskih tehnologij in inovativnih procesov.
3.3 The EESC points out that in urban areas - home to three quarters of the European population - the replacement of natural vegetation with buildings and constructions of any type worsens the damage caused by certain natural phenomena.
3.3 EESO poudarja, da na mestnih območjih – kjer živi tri četrt evropskega prebivalstva – nadomeščanje naravne vegetacije z najrazličnejšimi stavbami še dodatno povečuje škodo, ki jo povzročajo nekateri naravni pojavi.
3.3 The EESC points out that pricing and reimbursement procedures often produce unnecessary delay and involve excessive administrative procedures8 for the access of innovative, orphan and generic medicines in Union markets, in particular in those Member States where the national market is small and the company return on investment is low.
3.3 EESO poudarja, da postopki določanja cen in povračil pogosto povzročajo nepotrebne zamude in so povezani z odvečnimi upravnimi postopki8 za vstop inovativnih zdravil, zdravil sirot in generičnih zdravil na trge v EU, zlasti v državah članicah z majhnim trgom in nizko donosnostjo naložb podjetij.
3.3 The EESC points out that, while the EU set a very ambitious reduction target for road fatalities, it did not set such a target as regards severely injured road users.
3.3 EESO poudarja, da je EU zastavila zelo ambiciozen cilj za zmanjšanje števila smrtnih žrtev na cestah, kar pa ne velja tudi za število hudo poškodovanih udeležencev cestnega prometa.
3.3 The EESC points out the discrepancy between the stated objectives and the financial resources – a key component of a coherent policy – made available for the realisation of those objectives; this confirms an imbalance in the CAP as regards production in the Mediterranean.
3.3 EESO opozarja na razhajanja med navedenimi cilji in višino finančnih sredstev, ki so na voljo za njihovo uresničenje in predstavljajo zelo pomemben element vsake koherentne politike; to utrjuje tudi neravnovesje v skupni kmetijski politiki glede na proizvodnjo na sredozemskem območju.
3.3 The EESC proposes that the LEADER method be considered as an innovative bottom-up approach, which should therefore be as free as possible from red tape and thematic requirements.
3.3 Odbor predlaga, da naj se pristop LEADER upošteva kot inovativen pristop od spodaj navzgor in naj se zato čim manj omeji z birokratskimi postopki in tematiko.
3.3 The EESC recalls its opinion on the proposal for Directive 96/98/EC1 on marine equipment which strongly supported the same underlying objectives of the present proposal.
3.3 EESO znova opozarja na svoje mnenje o predlogu Direktive 96/98/ES1 o pomorski opremi, v katerem je izrazil močno podporo istim temeljnim ciljem, kot so navedeni v sedanjem predlogu.
3.3 The EESC recognises that "A partnership approach" is required to ensure child protection.
3.3 EESO priznava, da je za zagotavljanje zaščite otrok potreben "partnerski pristop".
3.3 The EESC recognises the value of the Youth on the Move initiative as an integral part of the Europe 2020 measures, and welcomes the overall provisions set out in the communication.
3.3 EESO priznava pomen pobude Mladi in mobilnost kot sestavnega dela ukrepov strategije Evropa 2020 ter pozdravlja splošne določbe, navedene v sporočilu.
3.3 The EESC recognises the vital role of transport as a factor for competitiveness and prosperity, the need to create an integrated European transport system, as well as the need to improve sustainability and promote low carbon transport modes, energy and resource efficiency, security and independence of supply and the reduction of traffic congestion.
3.3 EESO priznava, da ima promet ključno vlogo kot dejavnik konkurenčnosti in blaginje ter da je treba vzpostaviti celostni evropski prometni sistem, pa tudi okrepiti trajnostno razsežnost ter spodbuditi načine prevoza z nizkimi emisijami ogljika, energetsko učinkovitost, zanesljivo in neodvisno oskrbo z energijo in odpraviti prometne zastoje.
3.3 The EESC recommends linking and integrating the activities of the URBAN, LIFE and other programmes using the LEADER method, thereby increasing their combined added value.
3.3 Odbor priporoča povezavo in preplet dejavnosti URBAN, LIFE in drugih s pristopom LEADER ter s tem povečanje skupne dodane vrednosti.
3.3 The EESC recommends that compliance with the basic principles described above should be confirmed by means of a statement to that effect by political parties and foundations wishing to take advantage of the European statute.
3.3 EESO priporoča, naj politične stranke in fundacije, ki želijo evropski status, spoštovanje zgoraj navedenih temeljnih načel potrdijo z ustrezno izjavo.
3.3 The EESC regards the new definition of Avian Influenza and the requirement of surveillance and control of LPAI as an important step in the battle against the virus and its potential negative impacts.
3.3 EESO meni, da nova definicija aviarne influence in potreba po nadzoru virusa LPAI predstavljata pomemben korak v boju proti virusu in njegovimi posledicami.
3.3 The EESC regards the proposed establishment of an annual forum to evaluate the implementation of the Social Agenda as a fundamentally good idea.
3.3 EESO meni, da je ustanovitev letnega foruma, ki bi ocenjeval izvajanje socialne agende, načeloma smiselno.
3.3 The EESC regrets that the Commission's Communication does not explicitly mention the employment conditions of workers, the people who ultimately handle the animals.
3.3 EESO obžaluje, da Komisija v sporočilu ne navaja izrecno delovnih pogojev zaposlenih, ki so nenazadnje tisti, ki ravnajo z živalmi.
3.3 The EESC regrets that the report may be too focused on food retail and in doing so, fails to capture the importance of SMEs (over 95% of companies in retail and 11 million workers), their specific needs and difficulties, including after sales services, their role in the life of city centres, rural areas or suburban areas, their dependence on large manufacturers and competition with suppliers setting up their own distribution networks.
3.3 EESO obžaluje, da se poročilo morda preveč osredotoča na trgovino in distribucijo živil in pri tem ne podaja splošnega pregleda sektorja, zlasti pa ne prikaže pomena MSP (več kot 95 % podjetij v trgovini in distribuciji ter 11 milijonov delavcev), njihovih posebnih potreb in težav, vključno s potrošniškimi storitvami, njihove vloge za oživitev mestnih središč, podeželskih ali predmestnih območij, njihove odvisnosti od velikih proizvajalcev in konkurence v obliki dobaviteljev, ki vzpostavljajo lastne distribucijske mreže.
3.3 The EESC regrets that, while the action plan seeks to increase the involvement of shareholders, it does not seek to equally enhance the involvement of employees.
3.3 EESO obžaluje, da akcijski načrt, s katerim naj bi se sicer izboljšalo sodelovanje delničarjev, ne predvideva tudi večje udeležbe zaposlenih.
3.3 The EESC regrets the deadlock in the EU constitutional process given that the Constitutional Treaty and the Charter for Fundamental Rights explicitly recognise the rights of the child.
3.3 EESO obžaluje zastoj pri postopku sprejemanja ustave EU, saj ustavna pogodba in Evropska listina o temeljnih pravicah izrecno priznavata pravice otrok.
3.3 The EESC requests that account should be taken in this regard of the demographic situation and the ageing of the population and the labour markets in the Member States.
3.3 EESO poziva, da bi bilo treba pri tem upoštevati demografski položaj, staranje prebivalstva in trge dela v državah članicah.
3.3 The EESC sees capital markets as pools of liquidity, where companies can raise funds and trade with financial instruments.
3.3 Po mnenju EESO so kapitalski trgi skladišča likvidnosti, kjer podjetja lahko zberejo kapital in trgujejo s finančnimi instrumenti.
3.3 The EESC sees the desire of new immigrants to focus their migration projects on Europe as a major opportunity.
3.3 EESO meni, da je želja novih priseljencev po uresničitvi svojih priseljenskih načrtov v Evropi velika priložnost.
3.3 The EESC shares the concern of the Commission with regard to the lack of relevant statistical data on disabled persons, which is necessary for future policy development in the field.
3.3 EESO prav tako kot Komisijo skrbi pomanjkanje ustreznih statističnih podatkov o invalidnih osebah, ki so nujni za prihodnje oblikovanje politik na tem področju.
3.3 The EESC shares the view expressed by the Commission in the communication that the provisions of the current Directive 2004/18/EC and the new Directive 2014/24/EU, which has to be transposed into national law by 18 April this year at the latest, are basically sufficient to cope with the increasing numbers and time constraints caused by the current asylum situation.
3.3 EESO se strinja s stališčem, ki ga je Komisija navedla v sporočilu, namreč da določbe veljavne Direktive 2004/18/ES in nove Direktive 2014/24/EU, ki jih morajo države članice najpozneje do 18. aprila letos prenesti v nacionalno zakonodajo, večinoma že zadoščajo za obvladovanje vse večjega števila prišlekov in hujših časovnih pritiskov, ki so posledica sedanje krize na področju azila.
3.3 The EESC shares the view expressed by the Commission in the communication that the provisions of the current Directive 2004/18/EC and the new Directive 2014/24/EU, which has to be transposed into national law by 18 April this year, are basically sufficient to cope with the increasing numbers and time constraints caused by the current asylum situation.
3.3 EESO se strinja s stališčem, ki ga je Komisija navedla v sporočilu, namreč da določbe veljavne Direktive 2004/18/ES in nove Direktive 2014/24/EU, ki jih morajo države članice najpozneje do 18. aprila letos prenesti v nacionalno zakonodajo, večinoma že zadoščajo za obvladovanje vse večjega števila prišlekov in hujših časovnih pritiskov, ki so posledica sedanje krize na področju azila.
3.3 The EESC shares the view that the limitation to natural disasters will not exclude "cascading effects" of such disasters, e.g. on industrial plants or health and hospital facilities.
3.3 EESO se strinja, da omejitev na naravne nesreče ne izključuje "verižnih posledic" teh nesreč, na primer za industrijske obrate ali zdravje in bolnišnične objekte.
3.3 The EESC stresses the importance of safeguarding the independence of the National Supervisory Authorities (NSAs) from the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) as well as from political interference; this is essential for ensuring successful implementation.
3.3 EESO poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti, da bodo nacionalni nadzorni organi ostali neodvisni od navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa in od političnega vmešavanja, kar je bistvenega pomena za uspešno izvajanje.
3.3 The EESC stresses the importance of safeguarding the independence of the National Supervisory Authorities (NSAs) from the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) as well as from political interference; this is essential for ensuring successful implementation.
3.3 EESO poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti, da bodo nacionalni nadzorni organi še naprej neodvisni od navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa in od političnega vmešavanja, kar je bistvenega pomena za uspešno izvajanje.
3.3 The EESC stresses the importance of safeguarding the independence of the National Supervisory Authorities (NSAs) from the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) as well as from political interference; this is essential for ensuring successful implementation.
3.3 Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor poudarja pomen varovanja neodvisnosti nacionalnih nadzornih organov od izvajalcev storitev navigacijskih služb in od političnega vmešavanja, kar je bistvenega pomena za zagotavljanje uspešnega izvajanja.
3.3 The EESC stresses the importance of the active participation and autonomy of young people, not only in the labour market, but in society at large.
3.3 EESO poudarja pomen aktivnega sodelovanja in avtonomnosti mladih, ne le na trgu dela, temveč tudi v širši družbi.
3.3 The EESC supports the approach of the Commission as long as this ensures:
3.3 EESO podpira pristop Komisije, dokler bo omogočal naslednje:
3.3 The EESC supports the call of the wood and paper industries for a balanced approach to the use of wood biomass energy in order to avoid market distortions regarding the availability and price of forest-based raw materials for the manufacturing industries.
3.3 EESO podpira poziv lesne in papirniške industrije za uravnotežen pristop k uporabi energije iz lesne biomase, da bi se izognili izkrivljanju trga pri razpoložljivosti in ceni surovin, ki temeljijo na gozdarstvu, za predelovalno industrijo.
3.3 The EESC supports the Commission in its desire to penalise infringements of competition rules: it believes that the size of the penalties should act as a deterrent and that they should be made more severe in the event of a repeat infringement.
3.3 EESO podpira namero Komisije, da kaznuje kršitve pravil konkurence: meni, da bi moral znesek kazni delovati odvračilno in bi se moral v primeru ponovne kršitve povečati.
3.3 The EESC supports the communication's conclusions, including the 20% target for industry's share of GDP, although it would qualify its support for this: the 20% target is purely quantitative, while it would be more in line with EU aspirations for socially and environmentally sustainable competitiveness to add qualitative aspects.
3.3 EESO podpira sklepe iz sporočila, vključno s ciljem 20-odstotnega deleža industrije v BDP, čeprav pod naslednjim pogojem: cilj 20% je zgolj količinski, medtem ko bi bilo v skladu s prizadevanji EU za socialno in okoljsko trajnostno konkurenčnost bolj ustrezno, da se dodajo kakovostni vidiki.
3.3 The EESC supports the focus on a coordinated approach by all Member States of the euro zone but also across monetary, fiscal and structural/supply-side policies.
3.3 EESO podpira poudarek na usklajenem pristopu vseh držav članic euroobmočja, pa tudi v okviru monetarne, fiskalne in strukturne politike/politike na strani ponudbe.
3.3 The EESC takes note that the proposal only deals with coordination possibilities between the different kinds of networks in very general terms.
3.3 EESO ugotavlja, da predlog precej splošno obravnava možnosti koordinacije med različnimi vrstami omrežij.
3.3 The EESC takes the view that the market in healthcare services should be seen as a market with special rules, as it has a direct impact on the health of the population.
3.3 EESO meni, da je treba trg zdravstvenih storitev razumeti kot trg s posebnimi pravili, ker neposredno vpliva na zdravje prebivalstva.
3.3 The EESC takes the view that these changes and additions to the Sixth VAT Directive, if correctly implemented in the Member States, will be an effective instrument in countering the problem of tax evasion and avoidance.
3.3 EESO je mnenja, da bodo te spremembe in dopolnila k Šesti direktivi o DDV, če se bodo seveda pravilno izvajala, učinkovit instrument pri obvladovanju težav, povezanih z izogibanjem in utajo davkov.
3.3 The EESC takes the view that, out of the ten goals, set out in the White paper, civil society support seems particularly significant for goals number 1 (market acceptance and behavioural change), 3 (attitude of operators, transport planners and cargo owners), 4 (behavioural changes), 5, 7 (optimal use of infrastructure and traffic management systems, encouragement of efficient cross border planning) 8, 10 (fairness of the system), 9 (safety and security related behaviour patterns).
3.3 EESO meni, da se zdi, da izmed desetih ciljev, opredeljenih v beli knjigi, civilna družba še posebno podpira cilje 1 (tržno sprejemanje in spremembe obnašanja), 3 (vedenje prevoznikov, načrtovalcev prevoza in lastnikov tovora), 4 (spremembe obnašanja), 5, 7 (optimalna uporaba infrastrukture in sistemov za upravljanje prometa, spodbujanje učinkovitega čezmejnega načrtovanja), 8, 10 (poštenost sistema), 9 (vzorci obnašanja, povezani z varnostjo in zaščito).
3.3 The EESC therefore agrees that it would be inappropriate to produce an exhaustive list of SGI and to classify them according to whether they are economic or non-economic in nature, although SGEI typically have to try to achieve a series of trade-offs:
3.3 EESO se zato strinja, da ne bi bilo primerno pripravljati obsežnega seznama storitev splošnega pomena niti jih razvrščati glede na to, ali so gospodarske ali negospodarske, čeprav je za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena značilno prizadevanje za dosego različnih ravnovesij:
3.3 The EESC therefore agrees that it would be inappropriate to produce an exhaustive list of SGI; instead, the focus should be on their specific purpose, although SGEI typically have to try to achieve a series of trade-offs:
3.3 EESO se zato strinja, da ne bi bilo primerno pripravljati obsežnega seznama storitev splošnega pomena, ampak se je treba osredotočiti na njihovo nalogo, čeprav je za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena značilno prizadevanje za dosego različnih ravnovesij:
3.3 The EESC therefore considers that the Commission should conduct a study focusing on the current capacities of Community fleets and the quotas needed to ensure their competitiveness.
3.3 EESO zato meni, da bi morala Komisija opraviti študijo o sedanjih zmogljivosti ladjevja Skupnosti in kvot, potrebnih za njihovo konkurenčnost.
3.3 The EESC therefore supports the Commission's proposal.
3.3 EESO torej podpira predlog Komisije.
3.3 The EESC therefore welcomes the Commission's initiative to establish and promote European innovation partnerships (EIP) under the Innovation Union flagship initiative6, which are geared towards organising the European research and innovation cycle in a more effective way and reducing the timeframe for innovations in the market7.
3.3 EESO zato izrecno pozdravlja pobudo Komisije, da v okviru vodilne pobude Unija inovacij6 utemelji in spodbuja evropska partnerstva za inovacije, katerih cilj je zagotoviti večjo učinkovitost evropskega raziskovalnega in inovacijskega cikla ter skrajšati rok za novosti na trgu7.
3.3 The EESC therefore welcomes the proposal to amend Directive 2005/36/EC.
3.3 Zato EESO podpira predlog spremembe Direktive 2005/36/ES.
3.3 The EESC underlines the need for the European Commission and the Member States to set up and develop a mechanism for consulting all relevant stakeholders, primarily the social partners (trade unions and employer organisations) but also civil society, immigrant associations, academic experts and international organisations.
3.3 EESO poudarja, da je treba na ravni Evropske komisije in držav članic vzpostaviti in razviti mehanizem za posvetovanja z vsemi udeleženci, predvsem s socialnimi partnerji (sindikati in delodajalskimi organizacijami), a tudi s civilno družbo, združenji priseljencev, univerzitetnimi strokovnjaki in mednarodnimi organizacijami.
3.3 The EESC understands that the proposed budget is destined to enable EMSA to maintain its network of Stand-by Oil Spill Response divided among EU maritime areas and that a limited amount of new combating vessels will be deployed to fight pollution caused by ships and offshore installations.
3.3 EESO se zaveda, da je namen predlaganega proračuna EMSA omogočiti ohranitev omrežja v stalni pripravljenosti za ukrepanje ob razlitju nafte, razdeljenega po pomorskih območjih EU, in da se bo za boj proti onesnaženju z ladij in objektov na morju uporabljalo omejeno število novih tovrstnih plovil.
3.3 The EESC understands that the proposed budget is destined to enable EMSA to maintain its network of Stand-by Oil Spill Response divided among EU maritime areas and that a limited amount of new vessels will be deployed to fight pollution caused by ships and offshore installations.
3.3 EESO se zaveda, da je namen predlaganega proračuna EMSA omogočiti ohranitev omrežja v stalni pripravljenosti za ukrepanje ob razlitju nafte, razdeljenega po pomorskih območjih EU, in da se bo za boj proti onesnaženju z ladij in objektov na morju uporabljalo omejeno število novih plovil.
3.3 The EESC urges the Commission to indicate clearly that the key provisions in the current legislation will be incorporated in the new regulation rather than in delegated acts and that they will continue to apply.
3.3 EESO poziva Komisijo, naj jasno nakaže, da bodo glavne točke zdaj veljavne uredbe povzete v novi uredbi in ne v delegiranih aktih ter da bodo še naprej ostale veljavne.
3.3 The EESC welcomes the adoption of the decisions on the position to be taken by the European Union within the stabilisation and association councils established by the stabilisation and association agreements with Israel, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Croatia and Macedonia with regard to the adoption of provisions on the coordination of social security systems.
3.3 EESO izraža zadovoljstvo zaradi sprejetja odločitev, v katerih je opredeljeno stališče v zvezi s koordinacijo sistemov socialne varnosti, ki ga mora EU sprejeti v pridružitvenih svetih, ustanovljenih na podlagi sporazumov o pridružitvi in stabilizaciji z Izraelom, Tunizijo, Alžirijo, Marokom, Hrvaško in Makedonijo.
3.3 The EESC welcomes the adoption of the decisions on the position to be taken by the European Union within the stabilisation and association councils established by the stabilisation and association agreements with Israel, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Croatia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia with regard to the adoption of provisions on the coordination of social security systems.
3.3 EESO izraža zadovoljstvo zaradi sprejetja odločitev, v katerih je opredeljeno stališče v zvezi s koordinacijo sistemov socialne varnosti, ki ga mora EU sprejeti v pridružitvenih svetih, ustanovljenih na podlagi sporazumov o pridružitvi in stabilizaciji z Izraelom, Tunizijo, Alžirijo, Marokom, Hrvaško in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo.
3.3 The EESC welcomes the Commission's clear statement that the creation of such a system should not deprive consumers or traders of their rights to seek redress before the courts, should they wish to do so, or replace the normal operation of judicial processes.
3.3 EESO odobrava dejstvo, da je Komisija jasno navedla, da z uvedbo takega sistema potrošnikom ali trgovcem ne bi odvzeli pravice do uveljavljanja zaščite njihovih pravic pred sodiščem, če to želijo, niti ne bi nadomestili normalnega delovanja sodnih postopkov.
3.3 The EESC welcomes the Commission’s long-term focus on young people.
3.3 EESO pozdravlja dolgoročno pozornost, ki jo Komisija posveča mladim.
3.3 The EESC welcomes the effect that the proposal will have on the duration of the approval process for special measures applied by a Member State to combat tax fraud and evasion, which will increase the likelihood that such activities will be tackled effectively.
3.3 EESO pozdravlja učinek, ki ga bo predlog imel na trajanje postopka izdajanja odobritev za posebne ukrepe, ki jih uporabljajo države članice za boj proti davčnim goljufijam in utajam, kar bo povečalo verjetnost za učinkovit boj proti takšnim dejavnostim.
3.3 The EESC welcomes the European Commission's communication on i2010 as an essential exercise to frame the future strategy for the Information Society in the EU.
3.3 EESO pozdravlja sporočilo Evropske komisije o i2010 kot pomemben korak v okviru oblikovanja prihodnje strategije informacijske družbe v EU.
3.3 The EESC welcomes the fact that the Commission does not give a standard definition of social enterprise, as this reflects the diversity of existing provisions at national level.
3.3 EESO izraža zadovoljstvo, da Komisija – zaradi različnih določb, ki obstajajo na nacionalnih ravneh – ne podaja zakonodajne opredelitve socialnega podjetja.