natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3.10 The EESC feels that the Commission should consider the issue of digital inclusion16 in relation to the proposed measures, given that new information and communications technologies are a cross-cutting lever for inclusion and employment.
3.10 EESO meni, da bi morala Komisija pri predlaganih ukrepih upoštevati vprašanje digitalnega vključevanja16, saj so nove informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije medsektorski vzvod za vključevanje in zaposlovanje.
3.10 The EESC fully supports the EP's suggestion for the introduction of a European toy safety label, that would be awarded by independent third-party bodies, and regrets that the proposal has not fully responded to all the suggestions set out in the EP's resolution of September 2007; the EESC also echoes the concerns of SMEs, not that the toys they manufacture and sell might be less safe, but – as is also discussed in the above-mentioned opinion – relating to the proportionality of the measures used in the conformity assessment procedures, especially for non mass-produced products or products produced in small quantities18.
3.10 EESO odločno podpira predlog Evropskega parlamenta o uvedbi evropske oznake za varno igračo, ki bi jo podeljevali neodvisni tretji organi in obžaluje, da predlog ne upošteva vseh pobud, predvidenih v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta iz septembra 2007; EESO je prav tako kot mala in srednje velika podjetja zaskrbljen, vendar ne zaradi tega, ker bi lahko bile igrače, ki jih izdelujejo ali prodajajo, manj varne, ampak – kot je bilo povedano v navedenem mnenju – zaradi sorazmernosti ukrepov, uporabljenih v postopkih za ugotavljanje skladnosti, zlasti za izdelke, ki se ne proizvajajo množično ali se proizvajajo v majhnih količinah18.
3.10 The EESC fully supports the EP's suggestion for the introduction of a European toy safety label, that would be awarded by independent third-party bodies, and regrets that the proposal has not fully responded to all the suggestions set out in the EP's resolution of September 2007; the EESC also echoes the concerns of SMEs, not that the toys they manufacture and sell might be less safe, but – as is also discussed in the above-mentioned opinion – relating to the proportionality of the measures used in the conformity assessment procedures, especially for non mass-produced products or products produced in small quantities18.
3.10 EESO odločno podpira predlog Evropskega parlamenta o uvedbi evropske oznake za varno igračo, ki bi jo podeljevali neodvisni tretji organi in obžaluje, da predlog ne upošteva vseh pobud, predvidenih v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta iz septembra 2007; EESO je prav tako kot mala in srednje velika podjetja zaskrbljen, vendar ne zaradi tega, ker bi lahko bile igrače, ki jih izdelujejo ali prodajajo, manj varne, temveč – kot je bilo povedano v navedenem mnenju – zaradi sorazmernosti ukrepov, uporabljenih v postopkih za ugotavljanje skladnosti, zlasti za izdelke, ki se ne proizvajajo množično ali se proizvajajo v majhnih količinah18.
3.10 The EESC has highlighted on a number of occasions the importance of adapting legislation to the current situation facing the food supply chain.
3.10 EESO je ob številnih priložnostih opozoril, da je treba zakonodajo prilagoditi trenutnim razmeram v  verigi preskrbe s hrano.
3.10 The EESC has highlighted on a number of occasions the importance of adapting legislation to the current situation facing the food supply chain.
3.10 EESO je že večkrat opozoril, da je treba zakonodajo prilagoditi trenutnim razmeram v verigi preskrbe s hrano.
3.10 The EESC however cautions against using ratios such as carbon intensity [carbon emissions / unit of GDP], since reduction of this parameter can occur through an increase in a country’s GDP, rather than through a reduction in overall emissions for that country.
3.10 Vendar pa EESO svari pred uporabo parametrov, kot je intenzivnost emisij CO2 (emisije CO2 na enoto BDP), saj se lahko ta parameter zmanjša s povečanjem BDP države in ne z zmanjšanjem skupnih emisij te države.
3.10 The EESC is also aware, however, of the need for dialogue and discussions with those organisations whose activity or conduct legitimises the present authoritarian regime and thus undermines fundamental European values.
3.10 EESO se zaveda potrebe po dialogu in razpravah tudi z organizacijami, ki s svojimi dejavnostmi in ravnanjem priznavajo totalitarni režim na oblasti ter tako diskreditirajo temeljne evropske vrednote.
3.10 The EESC is aware that the amended regulatory framework has some influence on business growth and employment and welcomes the improved coherence between the two recast directives and the legislative and administrative simplification that they promote.
3.10 Odbor se zaveda, da spremenjeni regulativni okvir vpliva na rast podjetij in zaposlovanje, in pozdravlja večjo usklajenost obeh prenovljenih direktiv ter zakonodajno in upravno poenostavitev, ki jo omogočata.
3.10 The EESC is increasingly aware of the need to conduct a fresh debate, informed by this vision, about the liberalisation of the energy products markets that was introduced at the end of the 1990s.
3.10 EESO se čedalje bolj zaveda, da je na podlagi tega stališča treba opraviti ponovno razpravo o liberalizaciji trga proizvodnje energije, ki je bila uvedena v poznih devetdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja.
3.10 The EESC notes that the Commission, in the context of trade with third countries, proposes the abolition of export refunds for the sector, and points out that this is another aspect of EU policy that takes a generally piecemeal, not entirely consistent approach to the various sectors of agriculture.
3.10 EESO opaža, da Komisija na področju trgovine s tretjimi državami predlaga ukinitev izvoznih nadomestil za ta sektor, in ugotavlja, da to na splošno prispeva k neenotni politiki EU za različne sektorje kmetijstva.
3.10 The EESC notes that tramp vessel services as well as tramp shipping pools have always been subject to EC competition law, i.e. long before the adoption of Regulation 1419/2006 granting enforcement powers to the European Commission with regard to these services.
3.10 EESO opaža, da so prevozne storitve v prosti plovbi in združenja plovil v prosti plovbi že od nekdaj urejala pravila konkurence ES, tj. veliko pred sprejetjem Uredbe 1419/2006, ki je Evropski komisiji dodelila izvršilna pooblastila na področju teh storitev.
3.10 The EESC notes that, at the beginning of the regulation, the Commission accepts its suggestion to implement a voluntary programme of compensated restructuring, replacing its mandatory quota-reduction mechanism and the transferability of quotas at European level.
3.10 EESO ugotavlja, da je na začetku uredbe Komisija sprejela nasvet Odbora o izvajanju prostovoljnega programa prestrukturiranja z nadomestili, ki je zamenjal obvezni mehanizem zniževanja kvot in prenosljivosti kvot na evropski ravni.
3.10 The EESC observes that all the conventions with which the applicant countries are required to comply are those with mechanisms that the "relevant international organisations" can use to regularly evaluate how effective the implementation has been.
3.10  Kot opaža EESO, vse konvencije, v skladu s katerimi morajo ravnati države prosilke, vključujejo mehanizme, da “ustrezne mednarodne organizacije“ lahko redno vrednotijo učinkovitost njihovega izvajanja.
3.10 The EESC points to data concerning Chinese exports.
3.10 EESO opozarja na podatke o kitajskem izvozu.
3.10 The EESC promotes an inclusive single market and calls for compulsory social considerations in public procurement especially in fostering accessibility, through the adoption of an ambitious and legally binding European Accessibility Act, and promoting employment, non-discrimination and quality of social services.
3.10 EESO spodbuja vključujoč enotni trg in poziva k obvezni vključitvi socialnih vidikov v javna naročila, zlasti pri spodbujanju dostopnosti, in sicer s sprejetjem ambicioznega in pravno zavezujočega Evropskega akta o dostopnosti, in spodbujanju zaposlitve, nediskriminacije in kakovosti socialnih storitev.
3.10 The EESC prompts EMSA to deploy its newly acquired competence to contribute to the fight against maritime piracy.
3.10 EESO poziva EMSA, naj svoje nove pristojnosti uporabi za pomoč v boju proti pomorskemu piratstvu.
3.10 The EESC proposes conducting a dialogue with the partner countries, Member States, social partners and civil society on  matters relating to the labour market, including the development and the mobility of labour force as well as on the adoption of joint measures to combat illegal employment and the violation of the ILO's important conventions.
3.10 EESO predlaga organizacijo dialoga s partnerskimi državami, državami članicami, socialnimi partnerji in organizirano civilno družbo, da bi razpravljali o vprašanjih v zvezi s trgom dela, vključno z izpopolnjevanjem in mobilnostjo delavcev, ter o sprejetju skupnih ukrepov za boj proti nezakonitemu zaposlovanju in kršitvam pomembnih konvencij OZN.
3.10 The EESC proposes initiating a dialogue with the partner countries, Member States, social partners and civil society on how the EU labour market may be gradually opened up for citizens of the partner countries and on the adoption of joint measures to combat illegal employment and the violation of the ILO's core conventions.
3.10 EESO predlaga vzpostavitev dialoga s partnerskimi državami, državami članicami, socialnimi partnerji in organizirano civilno družbo, da bi preučili možnost postopnega odprtja trga dela v EU za državljane iz partnerskih držav in skupnega boja proti nezakonitemu zaposlovanju in kršitvam glavnih konvencij OZN.
3.10 The EESC recommends that a proper assessment be carried out of how these transitional rules may be consistently linked with supervisory actions in the case of non-compliance with the new rules.
3.10 EESO priporoča, da se opravi ustrezna ocena načina, kako se lahko ta prehodna pravila dosledno povežejo z nadzornimi ukrepi v primeru neskladnosti z novimi pravili.
3.10 The EESC recommends that cooperation amongst ethics committees should be increased to support Member States achieving greater efficiencies, economies of scale and the avoidance of duplication of effort.
3.10 EESO meni, da bi bilo treba sodelovanje med odbori za etična vprašanja povečati, s čimer bi se zagotovila podpora državam članicam pri doseganju večje učinkovitosti in ekonomij obsega ter pri prizadevanjih za preprečitev podvajanja.
3.10 The EESC recommends that the Commission evaluate the timing of technological investment, liberalisation and restructuring, given that companies, especially large ones, have to consider changes in management at the same time as research and innovation investment needs (for instance in the field of energy, transport and network industries).
3.10 EESO priporoča Komisiji, da oceni čas med tehnološkim vlaganjem, liberalizacijo in preoblikovanjem, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da morajo podjetja, zlasti največja, razmisliti o spremembah pri nadzoru, hkrati s potrebo po vlaganju v raziskave in inovacije (na primer v energetiko, promet in storitve omrežne dejavnosti).
3.10 The EESC recommends that the impact assessments take account of the full range of rules being framed and their respective costs: unjustified over-regulation would cause incalculable loss not only to the financial industry, but to the entire economy.
3.10 EESO priporoča, da se v ocenah učinka upošteva celoten sklop predpisov, ki se opredeljujejo, in povezana bremena, saj bi neupravičeno pretirano zakonsko urejanje povzročilo neizmerljivo škodo, ne samo za finančno industrijo, ampak za celotno gospodarstvo.
3.10 The EESC regrets that the Commission has not set out a growth scenario that maximises the potential of the single market, but concentrates instead on drastic fiscal consolidation as the prerequisite for growth.
3.10 "Odbor obžaluje, da Komisija ni izdelala scenarija rasti, ki bi v čim večji meri izkoristil potencial enotnega trga, ampak se je raje osredotočila na korenito fiskalno konsolidacijo kot predpogoj za rast.
3.10 The EESC regrets that the EU's ambition, as set out in the 2000 Lisbon Strategy, of becoming the most competitive and dynamic knowledge economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth as well as quantitative and qualitative improvement in employment and greater social cohesion, has been scaled down quite substantially.
3.10 EESO žal ugotavlja, da je EU očitno znižala svoj cilj, zastavljen v lizbonski strategiji iz leta 2000, da postane najbolj konkurenčno in dinamično na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu, sposobno trajnostne gospodarske rasti s številčnejšimi in boljšimi delovnimi mesti ter z večjo socialno kohezijo.
3.10 The EESC reiterates its support for self-regulation, where justified, and highlights the importance of using co-regulatory models because these appear to be particularly effective for implementing rules on protecting minors, as specifically mentioned in the Commission Communication, the Future of European Regulatory Audiovisual Policy COM(2003) 784 final of 15 December 200319.
3.10 EESO ponovno poudarja svojo podporo samoregulativi, kadar je ta upravičena, in poudarja pomen uporabe soregulativnih modelov, ker se ti zdijo zlasti učinkoviti za izvajanje predpisov o varstvu mladoletnikov, kot je posebej poudarjeno v Sporočilu Komisije "Prihodnost evropske regulativne avdiovizualne politike" COM(2003) 784 final z dne 15. decembra 2003.19
3.10 The EESC reiterates the need for a boost to be given at European level to European public services4 (including customs, Galileo, the European health card and judicial cooperation in civil matters, such as the taking of evidence and the service of documents), thus bringing the different public administrations together in these sectors.
3.10 EESO ponovno poudarja potrebo po krepitvi evropskih javnih storitev na evropski ravni4 (kamor spada med drugim carina, Galileo, evropska zdravstvena izkaznica in pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah, na primer pri pridobivanju dokazov in vročanju listin), pri čemer bi povezali različne javne uprave v teh sektorjih.
3.10 The EESC reiterates the need for a boost to be given at European level to European public services4 (including customs, Galileo, the European health card and judicial cooperation in civil matters, such as the taking of evidence and the service of documents, and other new services such as the European vehicle registration and the European driving licence), thus bringing the different public administrations together in these sectors.
3.10 EESO ponovno poudarja potrebo po krepitvi evropskih javnih storitev na evropski ravni4 (kamor spada med drugim carina, Galileo, evropska zdravstvena izkaznica in pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah, na primer pri pridobivanju dokazov in vročanju listin, ter druge nove storitve kot evropska registracija vozil in evropsko vozniško dovoljenje), pri čemer bi povezali različne javne uprave v teh sektorjih.
3.10 The EESC repeats its offer put forward in its NAT/652 opinion for the Committee to actively promote networks of civil society actors advocating the transition to a circular economy model and also explore the setting up and management of a European forum for the circular economy.
3.10 EESO ponavlja predlog iz mnenja NAT/652, da bi Odbor lahko dejavno spodbujal mreže akterjev civilne družbe, ki se zavzemajo za prehod na model krožnega gospodarstva, ter preučil možnost vzpostavitve in vodenja evropskega foruma za krožno gospodarstvo.
3.10 The EESC stresses that more research is needed to evaluate the suitability of the educational material, the means of accessing it, and the process of measuring improvements in financial skills over the long term.
3.10 EESO meni, da je treba okrepiti študije, namenjene oceni ustreznosti izobraževalnih vsebin in uporabljenih načinov dostopa, ter s tem meriti izboljšanje finančnih znanj na dolgi rok.
3.10 The EESC strongly supports the European Commission's actions relating to ICT standards and interoperability.
3.10 EESO močno podpira ukrepe Evropske komisije v zvezi s standardi IKT in interoperabilnostjo.
3.10 The EESC supports active involvement of the older generation in the labour market and in society as such.
3.10 EESO podpira aktivno udeležbo starejših na trgu dela in v družbi.
3.10 The EESC supports every manner of active involvement of the older generation in the labour market and in society as such.
3.10 EESO podpira vse oblike aktivne udeležbe starejših na trgu dela in v družbi.
3.10 The EESC therefore strongly supports the proposals put forward on 21 May 2010 in the contribution of the Social Protection Committee (SPC) to the new European strategy2.
3.10 EESO zato odločno podpira predloge z dne 21. maja 2010 iz prispevka Odbora za socialno zaščito k novi evropski strategiji2.
3.10 The EESC urges the Commission to encourage and support the use of the EQARF, as well as its continuous improvement at European and national levels.
3.10 EESO poziva Komisijo, da spodbuja ter podpira uporabo in stalno izboljševanje EQARF na evropski in nacionalni ravni.
3.10 The EESC urges the Commission to recognise that regular moderate drinkers who drink in harmful ways from time to time contribute to acute alcohol related harm, for example driving after drinking, alcohol triggered violence in public places, excessive drinking around sporting or other special events.
3.10 EESO poziva Komisijo, naj prizna, da redni zmerni pivci, ki na škodljiv način pijejo občasno, prispevajo k akutni škodi, ki jo povzroča alkohol, npr. z vožnjo po pitju, nasiljem na javnih krajih, ki mu botruje alkohol, ter prekomernim pitjem ob športnih ali drugih posebnih prireditvah.
3.10 The EESC welcomes the Commission's acknowledgment of children's need to express their views in dialogues and decisions affecting their lives as outlined in Article 12 of the UNCRC.
3.10 EESO pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija priznala potrebo otrok po izražanju njihovih mnenj v dialogih in odločitvah, ki vplivajo na njihova življenja, kot je določeno v členu 12 KZNOP.
3.10 The EESC welcomes the Commission's acknowledgment of children's need to express their views in dialogues and decisions affecting their lives as outlined in Article 12 of the UNCRC.
3.10 EESO pozdravlja, da je Komisija priznala potrebo otrok po izražanju njihovih mnenj v dialogih in odločitvah, ki vplivajo na njihova življenja, kot je določeno v členu 12 KZNOP.
3.10 The EESC welcomes the fact that the current Commission proposal explicitly clarifies that the function and purpose of the institutional structure aims to provide support and advice to decision-makers under the democratic control of the European Parliament and the Council of the EU11.
3.10 EESO pozdravlja, da je v sedanjem predlogu Komisije izrecno in jasno navedeno, da naj bi bila funkcija in namen institucionalne strukture zagotavljati podporo in svetovanje nosilcem odločanja pod demokratičnim nadzorom Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta EU11.
3.10 The EESC welcomes the fact that the current Commission proposal explicitly clarifies that the function and purpose of the institutional structure aims to provide support and advice to decision-makers under the democratic control of the European Parliament and the Council of the EU12.
3.10 EESO pozdravlja, da je v sedanjem predlogu Komisije izrecno in jasno navedeno, da naj bi bila funkcija in namen institucionalne strukture zagotavljati podporo in svetovanje nosilcem odločanja pod demokratičnim nadzorom Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta EU12.
3.10 The EESC welcomes the fact that the European Commission has made defence of and respect for fundamental rights and citizenship the first of the ten priorities for the next five years set out in its action plan for the development of an area of Freedom, Security and Justice.
3.10 EESO pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Evropska komisija zaščitila in upoštevala temeljne pravice in državljanstvo kot prvo od desetih prednostnih nalog za naslednjih pet let, določenih v akcijskem načrtu za razvoj območij svobode, varnosti in pravice.
3.10 The EESC welcomes the fact that the European Commission has made defence of and respect for fundamental rights and citizenship the first of the ten priorities for the next five years set out in its action plan for the development of an area of Freedom, Security and Justice.
3.10 EESO pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Evropska komisija zaščitila in upoštevala temeljne pravice in državljanstvo kot prvo od desetih prednostnih nalog za naslednjih pet let, določenih v akcijskem načrtu za razvoj območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
3.10 The EESC welcomes the improvement made, in that intermediaries are now in a position to classify clients effectively, but points out at the same time that the directive does not give the market suitable tools for protecting clients at all levels.
3.10 EESO ceni opravljene izboljšave, ker meni, da imajo zdaj posredniki možnost učinkovito kategorizirati stranke, obenem pa opozarja, da direktiva trgu ne daje primernih instrumentov za zaščito strank na vseh ravneh.
3.10 The EESC welcomes this initiative, but recommends that e-invoicing be made available to other operators, thus opening the market to other players.
3.10 EESO pozdravlja to pobudo, vendar poziva, da se omogoči delovanje na področju elektronskih računov tudi drugim ponudnikom in odpre trg drugim akterjem.
3.10 The EESC wishes to emphasise the need to adopt a geographically differentiated approach to transport policy, since the EU is a highly diverse territory with very different topographical, territorial and demographic etc., characteristics, in which core countries, containing areas with high levels of congestion and significant through-traffic, coexist with very large peripheral or rural areas that do not face the same constant pressure on their infrastructure.
3.10 Odbor poudarja potrebo, da se v prometno politiko uvede geografsko diferenciran pristop, ker se EU razprostira na zelo raznolikem območju z zelo različnimi orografskimi, ozemeljskimi, demografskimi in drugimi značilnostmi; na tem območju obstajajo srednjeevropske države, znotraj katerih je spet najti območja z veliko gostoto prometa in močnim tranzitnim prometom, ter velika ali podeželska območja na obrobju, katerih infrastruktura ni izpostavljena enakemu, stalnemu pritisku.
3.10 The EESC wishes to refer to the comments that it made two years ago in its opinion on the draft document: Putting forward a "strategy" that looks forward only 25 years and does not address, or only inadequately addresses, the entirely foreseeable shortage or indeed exhaustion of certain key non-renewable resources (such as fossil fuels) in the long term sends the wrong political signal to society.
3.10 EESO želi poudariti svojo ugotovitev, ki jo je izrazil že pred dvema letoma v svojem mnenju k osnutku dokumenta: Predložitev strategije, ki zajema le 25 let in se ne ali pa nezadostno posveča dolgoročno vsekakor predvidljivemu pomanjkanju oz. izčrpanju določenih glavnih neobnovljivih virov (kot npr. fosilnih virov), je napačen politični signal za družbo.
3.10 The EESC would have liked to see the Commission adopt an approach that was more in line with the needs and expectations of the public and that applied more systematically to certain fields of economic and social activity such as, for example, e-commerce, direct marketing, employment relationships, public authorities, surveillance and security, DNA etc., by differentiating the legal regimes for these very different aspects of data processing according to their nature.
3.10 EESO bi želel, da Komisija sprejme pristop, ki bi bolj ustrezal resničnim potrebam in željam državljanov ter bil bolj sistematičen glede na naravo nekaterih področij gospodarske in družbene dejavnosti, kot so na primer spletno poslovanje, neposredno trženje, delovna razmerja, javni organi, nadzor in varnost, DNK itd., tako da bi razlikovala med pravnimi ureditvami glede na te zelo različne vidike obdelave podatkov.