natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2.8.3 A well-structured macro-regional strategy can provide a common European framework to promote cultural enrichment and the empowerment of national civil societies at the regional level.
2.8.3 Dobro strukturirana makroregionalna strategija lahko zagotovi skupen evropski okvir za spodbujanje kulturne obogatitve in večje vloge nacionalnih civilnih družb na regionalni ravni.
2.8.3 As mentioned in the Green Paper, brain drain is a strong negative factor for countries of origin, because they do not receive any return on the investment they make in training.
2.8.3 Beg možganov je, kot je zapisano v zeleni knjigi, zelo negativen dejavnik za države izvora, ki zaradi njega ne morejo uživati sadov svojih naložb v izobraževanje.
2.8.3 Copyright clearance and management by facilitating pan-European content licensing and developing EU-wide copyright rules taking all interests into account is necessary.
2.8.3 Potrebna sta prenos in upravljanje avtorskih pravic z olajšanjem vseevropskega licenciranja vsebin in razvojem pravil za avtorske pravice za celotno EU.
2.8.3 Help desk
2.8.3 Služba za tehnično pomoč
2.8.3 If the measures envisaged by the Commission are in accordance with the opinion of the committee, the following procedure is to apply:
2.8.3 Če so ukrepi, ki jih načrtuje Komisija, skladni z mnenjem odbora, se uporabi naslednji postopek:
2.8.3 National criteria could be modified based on the requirements of each level (national, regional, local and sectoral8) and adapted accordingly.
2.8.3 Nacionalna merila se lahko spremenijo glede na zahteve posamezne ravni (nacionalne, regionalne, lokalne in sektorske8) in ustrezno prilagodijo.
2.8.3 Negotiations between the Commission and the Member States on the distribution of total allowable catches (TACs) continued until 1983, when Regulation (EEC) No 170/1983 was approved, which established a Community system for the conservation and management of fishery resources11 and set down the definitive distribution in accordance with the following criteria: the traditional fishing activities of each Member State, the particular needs of regions where local populations are especially dependent on fisheries (taking the Hague preferences into consideration) and the potential loss of catches in third-country waters as a result of the extension of the exclusive economic zones to 200 nautical miles.
2.8.3 Pogajanja med Komisijo in državami članicami o razporeditvi celotnega dovoljenega ulova so se nadaljevala v leto 1983, ko je bila sprejeta Uredba (EGS) št. 170/83 o ustanovitvi sistema Skupnosti za ohranitev in upravljanje ribolovnih virov11, ki je določala dokončno razporeditev glede na naslednja merila: tradicionalno ribištvo v posamezni državi članici, posebne potrebe regij, kjer je lokalno prebivalstvo odvisno predvsem od ribištva (upoštevanje haaških preferencialov) in morebitna izguba ulova v vodah tretjih držav zaradi razširitve izključne ekonomske cone na 200 navtičnih milj.
2.8.3 Negotiations between the Commission and the Member States on the distribution of total allowable catches (TACs) continued until 1983, when Regulation (EEC) No 170/1983 was approved, which established a Community system for the conservation and management of fishery resources11 and set down the definitive distribution in accordance with the following criteria: the traditional fishing activities of each Member State, the particular needs of regions where local populations are especially dependent on fisheries (taking the Hague preferences into consideration) and the potential loss of catches in third-country waters as a result of the extension of the exclusive economic zones to 200 nautical miles.
2.8.3 Pogajanja med Komisijo in državami članicami o razporeditvi celotnega dovoljenega ulova so se nadaljevala v leto 1983, ko je bila sprejeta Uredba (EGS) št. 170/83 o ustanovitvi sistema Skupnosti za ohranitev in upravljanje ribolovnih virov11, ki je določala dokončno razporeditev glede na naslednja merila: tradicionalno ribištvo v posamezni državi članici, posebne potrebe regij, kjer je lokalno prebivalstvo odvisno predvsem od ribištva (upoštevanje haaških preferencialov) in morebitna izguba ulova v vodah tretjih držav zaradi razširitve izključnega gospodarskega pasu na 200 navtičnih milj.
2.8.3 Negotiations between the Commission and the Member States on the distribution of total allowable catches (TACs) continued until 1983, when Regulation (EEC) No 170/83 was approved, which established a Community system for the conservation and management of fishery resources10 and set down the definitive distribution in accordance with the following criteria: the traditional fishing activities of each Member State, the particular needs of regions where local populations are especially dependent on fisheries (taking the Hague preferences into consideration) and the potential loss of catches in third-country waters as a result of the extension of the exclusive economic zones to 200 nautical miles.
2.8.3 Pogajanja med Komisijo in državami članicami o razporeditvi celotnega dovoljenega ulova so se nadaljevala v leto 1983, ko je bila sprejeta Uredba (EGS) št. 170/83 o ustanovitvi sistema Skupnosti za ohranitev in upravljanje ribolovnih virov10, ki je določala dokončno razporeditev glede na naslednja merila: tradicionalno ribištvo v posamezni državi članici, posebne potrebe regij, kjer je lokalno prebivalstvo odvisno predvsem od ribištva (upoštevanje haaških preferencialov) in morebitna izguba ulova v vodah tretjih držav zaradi razširitve izključnega gospodarskega pasu na 200 navtičnih milj.
2.8.3 Regional network coverage is the result of political choices and investment.
2.8.3 Povezovanje ozemelj v omrežja je rezultat političnih izbir in naložb.
2.8.3 stepping up the inclusion and role of civil society and the social partners in the process of strategically designing smart cities, and in their implementation and subsequent monitoring, which is essential when it comes to improving the quality of life and work of individuals and businesses.
2.8.3 Okrepiti je treba prisotnost in vlogo civilne družbe in socialnih partnerjev pri strateškem oblikovanju pametnih mest, pri njihovem uveljavljanju in kasnejšem spremljanju, saj je to bistvenega pomena za izboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih razmer za državljane in podjetja.
2.8.3 The Committee stresses that the "stakeholder mapping" must ensure a good geographical breakdown by target group, with special attention to under-represented groups.
2.8.3 Odbor poudarja, da je treba pri opredelitvi deležnikov poskrbeti za dobro porazdelitev, tako geografsko kot po ciljnih skupinah, pri tem pa posebno pozornost nameniti nezadostno zastopanim skupinam.
2.8.3 The Committee stresses that the "stakeholder mapping" must ensure a good geographical breakdown by target group, with special attention to under-represented groups.
2.8.3 Odbor poudarja, da je treba pri opredelitvi deležnikov poskrbeti za dobro porazdelitev, tako geografsko kot pot ciljnih skupinah, pri tem pa posebno pozornost nameniti nezadostno zastopanim skupinam.
2.8.3 The EESC believes that the audit or supervisory committee should not just monitor, but actually take responsibility for the integrity of these processes, in line with the principles and precepts detailed in paragraphs 2.6 and 2.7 above.
2.8.3 EESO meni, da revizijska ali nadzorna komisija teh postopkov ne bi smela le spremljati, ampak mora v skladu z načeli in smernicami, opisanimi v točkah 2.6 in 2.7, dejansko prevzeti odgovornost za njihovo neoporečnost.
2.8.3 The EESC is pleased that the Commission has included, within the ambit of integrated, balanced and pluralistic impact assessments, alternative approaches that address the cost of non-Europe and the impact of the different options on competitiveness, the effect of the proposals on SMEs and micro-enterprises, and the digital and territorial dimension4.
2.8.3 EESO veseli, da je Komisija v svoje celostne, uravnotežene in pluralistične ocene učinka vključila nadomestne rešitve, ki se navezujejo na strošek neukrepanja na ravni EU in učinek različnih možnosti na konkurenčnost, pa tudi na posledice predlogov za MSP in mikropodjetja ter za digitalno in teritorialno razsežnost.4
2.8.3 The EESC is therefore surprised to note that national NGOs are not included in the list of stakeholders specifically mentioned as having access to PROGRESS.
2.8.3 EESO je v tej zvezi začuden nad tem, da v seznamu navedenih akterjev z dostopom do programa PROGRESS manjkajo nacionalne nevladne organizacije.
2.8.3 The EESC recommends that the EU work to improve civil society participation on several levels:
2.8.3 EESO priporoča, naj si EU prizadeva za izboljšanje udeležbe civilne družbe na naslednjih ravneh:
2.8.3 The EESC's aim is to take part in this work, presenting the views and proposals of organised civil society in the EU.
2.8.3 EESO namerava pri tem sodelovati, prispeva pa lahko poglede in predloge organizirane civilne družbe v EU.
2.8.3 The extra costs faced by ORs are often difficult to pin down.
2.8.3 Dodatne stroške, ki bremenijo najbolj oddaljene regije, je pogosto težko opredeliti.
2.8.3 Wood-based energy should be promoted as part of an EU strategy to encourage innovative energy forms and the Biomass Action Plan.
2.8.3 V okviru strategije EU je treba spodbujati rabo energije iz lesa ter s tem inovativne energetske oblike in akcijski načrt o biomasi.
2.8.4 A macro-regional strategy could make it possible to plan infrastructure development on a trans-national geographic scale, promoting the development of ICT networks, highways, railways and ports, thereby ensuring territorial cohesion and competitiveness without barriers or bottlenecks.
2.8.4 Makroregionalna strategija bi lahko tudi omogočila načrtovanje razvoja infrastrukture na čeznacionalni geografski ravni s spodbujanjem razvoja omrežij IKT, avtocest, železnic in pristanišč, s čimer bi zagotovili teritorialno kohezijo in konkurenčnost brez omejitev in zastojev.
2.8.4 A macro-regional strategy could make it possible to plan infrastructure development on a transnational geographic scale, promoting the development of ICT networks, highways, railroads and ports, thereby ensuring territorial cohesion and competitiveness without barriers and bottlenecks.
2.8.4 Makroregionalna strategija bi lahko tudi omogočila načrtovanje razvoja infrastrukture na čeznacionalni geografski ravni s spodbujanjem razvoja omrežij IKT, avtocest, železnic in pristanišč, s čimer bi zagotovili teritorialno kohezijo in konkurenčnost brez omejitev in zastojev.
2.8.4 At the Congress The Power of Inland Navigation (10-12 November 2004, The Hague), organised by the Netherlands' Presidency of the EU in order to highlight the contribution of IWT to economic growth and to progress of society at large, social aspects were, once more, hardly considered.
2.8.4 Na kongresu o nalogah prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh, ki ga je od 10. do 12. novembra 2004 v Haagu organiziralo nizozemsko predsedstvo EU, da bi izpostavilo prispevek prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh h gospodarski rasti in napredku družbe na splošno, so bili, kot tolikokrat, socialni vidiki komajda omenjeni.
2.8.4 At the Congress The Power of Inland Navigation (10-12 November 2004, The Hague), organised by the Netherlands' Presidency of the EU in order to highlight the contribution of IWT to economic growth and to progress of society at large, social aspects were, once more, hardly considered.
2.8.4 Na kongresu o nalogah prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh, ki ga je od 10. do 12. novembra 2004 v Haagu organiziralo nizozemsko predsedstvo EU, da bi poudarilo prispevek prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh h gospodarski rasti in napredku družbe na splošno, so bili, kot tolikokrat, socialni vidiki komajda omenjeni.
2.8.4 Establishment of an SME committee
2.8.4 Ustanovitev odbora za MSP
2.8.4 If the measures envisaged by the Commission are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the following procedure is to apply:
2.8.4 Če ukrepi, ki jih načrtuje Komisija, niso skladni z mnenjem odbora, ali če mnenja ni, se uporabi naslednji postopek:
2.8.4 In this way stakeholders would be able to set realistic targets and provide coherent information for the revision of NRPs.
2.8.4 Na ta način bi lahko zainteresirane strani postavile uresničljive cilje in zagotovile usklajene informacije za revizijo nacionalnih programov reform.
2.8.4 It is also important to recognise that sustainable use of renewable natural resources is crucial to competitiveness and economic sustainability when defining the role of forestry and conditions under which it operates.
2.8.4 Prav tako pomembno je spoznanje, da je uporaba obnovljivih naravnih virov osrednjega pomena za konkurenčnost in gospodarsko trajnost, ko opredeljujemo vlogo gozdarstva in pogoje, v katerih se izvaja.
2.8.4 Respecting certain historical and sociological specificities in different legal systems does not exclude the possibility that, in the long term, a greater level of standardisation, or at least a higher degree of convergence, will finally come into existence in Europe, thereby facilitating the execution and settlement of international wills.
2.8.4 Upoštevanje nekaterih zgodovinskih in socioloških posebnosti v različnih pravnih sistemih ne izključuje možnosti, da bo v Evropi dolgoročno vendarle prišlo do večje uskladitve ali vsaj do zbližanja, kar bi poenostavilo izvrševanje oporok in urejanje dedovanja z mednarodnim elementom.
2.8.4 The Committee therefore calls for appropriate clarifications and alignment of Articles 2, 9 and 10 in the proposal for a decision, in order to safeguard one of overarching goals mentioned by the Commission, namely cooperation with civil society organisations.
2.8.4 Odbor zato priporoča pripravo ustreznih pojasnil in uskladitev v členih 2, 9 in 10 predloga sklepa, da bi zagotovili enega izmed nadrejenih ciljev, ki jih je navedla Komisija, in sicer sodelovanje z organizacijami civilne družbe.
2.8.4 The Committee welcomes the Commission's ability to conduct its impact assessment either on its own initiative or at the request of the European Parliament or the Council, but regrets that each institution makes its own decision on how to actually go about the assessment.
2.8.4 Odbor veseli, da lahko Komisija na lastno pobudo ali na poziv Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta dopolni oceno učinka, vendar obžaluje, da vsaka institucija sama določa, kako bo organizirala ocenjevanje.
2.8.4 The EESC thinks that EU policies should take account of these extra costs and take measures to try to mitigate them as far as possible.
2.8.4 EESO meni, da morajo evropske politike upoštevati te dodatne stroške in sprejeti ukrepe, s katerimi bi jih čim bolj zmanjšali.
2.8.4 The EESC's aim is to take part in this work, presenting the views and proposals of organised civil society in the EU.
2.8.4 EESO namerava pri tem sodelovati, prispeva pa lahko poglede in predloge organizirane civilne družbe v EU.
2.8.4 This distribution scheme, recognised as a criterion for relative stability, guaranteed each Member State11 an invariable percentage of the TAC for each species.
2.8.4 Ta sistem razporeditve, ki je veljal kot merilo relativne stabilnosti, je vsaki državi članici11 zagotovil nespremenljiv delež celotnega dovoljenega ulova za vsako vrsto posebej.
2.8.4 This distribution scheme, recognised as a criterion for relative stability, guaranteed each Member State12 an invariable percentage of the TAC for each species.
2.8.4 Ta sistem razporeditve, ki je veljal kot merilo relativne stabilnosti, je vsaki državi članici12 zagotovil nespremenljiv delež celotnega dovoljenega ulova za vsako vrsto posebej.
2.8.4 Voluntary return to the country of origin should be facilitated for workers able to contribute to development through their professional skills or entrepreneurship.
2.8.4 Prav tako mora lajšati prostovoljno vrnitev v državo izvora tistim priseljencem, ki zaradi svojih poklicnih sposobnosti ali podjetnosti lahko pomembno prispevajo k razvoju svoje države.
2.8.5 European cooperation programmes should promote investment projects involving professionals or investors from the country of origin, particularly those who have returned from abroad.
2.8.5 Naložbeni projekti morajo spodbujati programe sodelovanja, pri katerih bodo sodelovali strokovnjaki ali investitorji države izvora in ki bodo vključevali zlasti osebe, ki so se vrnile v državo izvora.
2.8.5 The EESC's position is that impact assessments must be carried out within the EU institutions themselves.
2.8.5 Po mnenju EESO je treba ocene učinka izvajati tudi znotraj evropskih institucij.
2.8.5 Under Regulation (EEC) No 170/83, the Commission was to draw up a report on the socio-economic situation of coastal regions by 31 December 1991.
2.8.5 Po Uredbi (EGS) št. 170/83 je morala Komisija do 31. decembra 1991 pripraviti poročilo o družbeno-gospodarskem položaju obalnih regij.
2.8.6 European cooperation programmes should promote investment projects involving professionals or investors from the country of origin, particularly those who have returned from abroad.
2.8.6 Naložbeni projekti morajo spodbujati programe sodelovanja, pri katerih bodo sodelovali strokovnjaki ali investitorji države izvora in ki bodo vključevali zlasti osebe, ki so se vrnile v državo izvora.
2.8.6 In its Opinion25 on the Community return policy and the Opinion26 on the Green Paper, the Committee shared its views on how voluntary return could contribute to the economic and social development of the countries of origin.
2.8.6 V mnenju25o politiki Skupnosti glede vračanja oseb, ki prebivajo nezakonito ter v predhodnem mnenju26 o zeleni knjigi se je EESO opredelil glede prispevka prostovoljnega vračanja k ekonomskemu in socialnemu razvoju države izvora.
2.8.6 In the light of the report submitted by the Commission, the Council made the political decision to extend the system of access conditions and quota distribution criteria until 31.12.0213.
2.8.6 V zvezi s poročilom Komisije je Svet sprejel politično odločitev, da podaljša sistem o pogojih dostopa in meril za razdelitev kvot do 31. decembra 200213.
2.8.6 In the light of the report submitted by the Commission, the Council made the political decision to extend the system of access conditions and quota distribution criteria until 31.12.0214.
2.8.6 V zvezi s poročilom Komisije je Svet sprejel politično odločitev, da podaljša sistem o pogojih dostopa in meril za razdelitev kvot do 31. decembra 200214.
2.8.7  Finally, Article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy stated that "fishing opportunities shall be distributed among Member States in such a way as to assure each Member State relative stability of fishing activities for each stock or fishery."
2.8.7  Člen 20 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike določa, da se "ribolovne možnosti razdelijo med države članice tako, da se vsaki državi članici zagotovi ustrezna stabilnost ribolovnih aktivnosti za vsak stalež ali ribolovno območje".
2.8.7  Finally, Article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy stated that "fishing opportunities shall be distributed among Member States in such a way as to assure each Member State relative stability of fishing activities for each stock or fishery."
2.8.7 Člen 20 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike določa, da se "ribolovne možnosti razdelijo med države članice tako, da se vsaki državi članici zagotovi ustrezna stabilnost ribolovnih aktivnosti za vsak stalež ali ribolovno območje".
2.8.7  Finally, Article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy stated that “fishing opportunities shall be distributed among Member States in such a way as to assure each Member State relative stability of fishing activities for each stock or fishery.”
2.8.7  Člen 20 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike določa, da se "ribolovne možnosti razdelijo med države članice tako, da se vsaki državi članici zagotovi ustrezna stabilnost ribolovnih aktivnosti za vsak stalež ali ribolovno območje".
2.8.7 In its Opinion25 on the Community return policy and the Opinion26 on the Green Paper, the Committee shared its views on how voluntary return could contribute to the economic and social development of the countries of origin.
2.8.7 V mnenju25o politiki Skupnosti glede vračanja oseb, ki prebivajo nezakonito ter v predhodnem mnenju26 o zeleni knjigi se je EESO opredelil glede prispevka prostovoljnega vračanja k ekonomskemu in socialnemu razvoju države izvora.
2.8.7 In its Opinion25 on the Community return policy and the Opinion26 on the Green Paper, the Committee shared its views on how voluntary return could contribute to the economic and social development of the countries of origin.
2.8.7 V mnenju25o politiki Skupnosti glede vračanja oseb, ki prebivajo nezakonito, in v predhodnem mnenju26 o zeleni knjigi se je EESO opredelil glede prispevka prostovoljnega vračanja k ekonomskemu in socialnemu razvoju države izvora.
2.8.7 The management of migration in cooperation with countries of origin should be improved.
2.8.7 Sodelovanje z državami izvora je treba okrepiti.
2.8.8 The EU could draw up preferential agreements with candidate countries.
2.8.8 EU lahko sklene prednostne sporazume z državami kandidatkami za vstop.
2.8.8 The management of migration in cooperation with countries of origin should be improved.
2.8.8 Sodelovanje z državami izvora je treba okrepiti.
2.8.9 Also, in the cooperation agreements that the EU has reached with countries and regional groupings, there could be preferential conditions for access to migration, avoiding any ethnic or cultural discrimination.
2.8.9 EU lahko tudi uvede prednostne pogoje za dostop do priseljevanja v okviru sporazumov o sodelovanju, sklenjenih z državami in regionalnimi združenji, obenem pa skrbi, da se izogne vsakršni etnični ali kulturni diskriminaciji.
2.8.9 The EU could draw up preferential agreements with candidate countries.
2.8.9 EU lahko sklene prednostne sporazume z državami kandidatkami za vstop.
2.84 (current) and 9 (forecast) (calculated as – see the SWD)
2,84 (trenutno) in 9 (napovedano) (izračunano kot – glej delovni dokument služb Komisije)
2.88% to 4.39% of the total
2,88 % do 4,39 % skupnih sredstev,
2.9 2021 will be the 10th anniversary of the conclusion of the CRPD by the EU.
2.9 V letu 2021 bo 10. obletnica podpisa Konvencije o pravicah invalidov s strani EU.
2.9 2021 will be the 10th anniversary of the conclusion of the UN CRPD by the EU.
2.9 V letu 2021 bo 10. obletnica podpisa Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov s strani EU.
2.9 2021 will be the 10th anniversary of the conclusion of the UN CRPD by the EU.
2.9 V letu 2021 bo 10 let, odkar je EU podpisala Konvencijo ZN o pravicah invalidov.
2.9 A big part of the instruments and measures to cut emissions are to be put in place by Member States.
2.9 Za velik del instrumentov in ukrepov za zmanjšanje emisij so pristojne države članice.
2.9 A debate is going on concerning the importance of safe and secured rest places for professional drivers.
2.9 Trenutno poteka razprava o pomenu varnih in varovanih počivališč za poklicne voznike.
2.9 A deeper and fairer single market is one of the Commission's ten priorities: eliminating the remaining regulatory and non-regulatory barriers to the single market in goods and services was one of the priorities set out in the Annual Growth Survey 20157.
2.9 Globlji in pravičnejši enotni trg je ena od desetih političnih prioritet Komisije: odprava preostalih ovir v predpisih in zunaj njih na enotnem trgu blaga in storitev je bila navedena kot ena od prednostnih nalog v Letnem pregledu rasti za leto 20157.