natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2.2 The Commission's 2007 annual progress report on the Lisbon Strategy for growth and employment focused on climate change, eco-innovation, energy efficiency, renewable energy sources and energy markets.
2.2 V letnem poročilu 2007 o napredku lizbonske strategije za rast in zaposlovanje je Komisija namenila poudarek podnebnim spremembam, ekološkim inovacijam, energetski učinkovitosti, obnovljivim virom energije in energetskim trgom.
2.2 The Commission's 2007 annual progress report on the Lisbon Strategy for growth and employment focused on climate change, eco-innovation, energy efficiency, renewable energy sources and energy markets.
2.2 V letnem poročilu 2007 o napredku lizbonske strategije za rast in zaposlovanje se je Komisija osredotočila na podnebne spremembe, ekološke inovacije, energetsko učinkovitost, obnovljive vire energije in energetske trge.
2.2 The Commission's 2008 report on equality between women and men in Europe1 states: "Female employment has been the main factor in the steady growth of employment in the EU in recent years.
2.2 Poročilo Komisije o enakosti med ženskami in moškimi iz leta 20081 navaja: "Zaposlovanje žensk je bil glavni dejavnik stalnega naraščanja zaposlovanja v EU v zadnjih letih.
2.2 The Commission's call for a "job-rich recovery" comes at a time when massive job losses in several countries triggered by multiple crises (financial, economic, social, euro and debt crises, and a crisis of confidence) are damaging people's lives, whether because they have lost their jobs, because they cannot find others, because they are forced to accept lower wages or because social security benefits have been reduced or withdrawn.
2.2 Poziv Komisije k okrevanju s številnimi novimi delovnimi mesti prihaja v času, ko je po več zaporednih krizah (finančni, gospodarski in socialni krizi, krizi eura, dolžniški krizi in krizi zaupanja) v mnogih državah prišlo do ukinitve številnih delovnih mest, kar je prizadelo vsakdanje življenje mnogih ljudi, bodisi ker so izgubili delovno mesto bodisi ker ne najdejo nove zaposlitve ali ker so morali sprejeti znižanje plač in znižanje ali neplačevanje socialnih prispevkov.
2.2 The Commission's call for a "job-rich recovery" comes at a time when massive job losses in several countries triggered by multiple crises (financial, economic, social, euro and debt crises, and a crisis of confidence) are damaging people's lives, whether because they have lost their jobs, because they cannot find others, because they are forced to accept lower wages or because social security benefits have been slashed or withdrawn.
2.2 Poziv Komisije k okrevanju s številnimi novimi delovnimi mesti prihaja v času, ko je po več zaporednih krizah (finančni, gospodarski in socialni krizi, krizi eura, dolžniški krizi in krizi zaupanja) v mnogih državah prišlo do ukinitve številnih delovnih mest, kar je prizadelo vsakdanje življenje mnogih ljudi, bodisi ker so izgubili delovno mesto bodisi ker ne najdejo nove zaposlitve ali ker so morali sprejeti znižanje plač in znižanje ali neplačevanje socialnih prispevkov.
2.2 The Commission's communication on CCS contains evidence of these complexities, identifying the lack of a long term business case as the main reason for failure to progress in CCS development.
2.2 V sporočilu Komisije o CCS je ta kompleksnost prikazana, kot glavni vzrok za prekinitev razvoja CCS pa je navedena dolgoročna poslovna nezanimivost.
2.2 The Commission's goal is to improve the functioning of the internal market when it comes to euro payment systems in order to ensure that domestic and international transactions are subject to the same rules, bringing savings and benefits to both consumers and the economy in general.
2.2 Namen Komisije je izboljšati delovanje notranjega trga sistemov plačil v eurih, na katerem bi za domače in mednarodne transakcije veljala enaka pravila, kar bi prineslo prihranke in koristi tako za potrošnike kot za gospodarstvo nasploh.
2.2 The Commission's initiative is necessary in the first place because introduction of the new Customs Code requires that procedures be consistent with the new rules.
2.2 Pobuda Komisije je v prvi vrsti potreben ukrep, ker je kot pogoj za uresničitev novega carinskega zakonika treba postopke prilagoditi novim standardom.
2.2 The Commission's initiative is necessary in the first place because introduction of the new Customs Code requires that procedures be consistent with the new rules.
2.2 Pobuda Komisije je v prvi vrsti potreben ukrep, ker je treba, kot pogoj za uresničitev novega carinskega zakonika, postopke prilagoditi novim standardom.
2.2 The Commission's intention is that mobilising independent national expertise will encourage Member States to assume responsibility themselves for necessary measures and reforms at national level.
2.2 Komisija namerava z mobilizacijo neodvisnega nacionalnega strokovnega znanja spodbuditi države članice, da same prevzamejo odgovornost za potrebne ukrepe in reforme na nacionalni ravni.
2.2 The Commission's intention is to update the current framework established by the market abuse directive and to ensure gradual harmonisation of European rules on insider dealing and market manipulation, in response to changing market conditions.
2.2 Cilj Komisije je posodobiti okvir, ki je bil vzpostavljen z veljavno direktivo o zlorabi trga, in poskrbeti za še večje poenotenje evropskih predpisov o trgovanju z notranjimi informacijami in tržni manipulaciji.
2.2 The Commission's proposal for a directive on enforcement of the directive on posting of workers includes the following:
2.2 Predlog Komisije za direktivo o izvrševanju direktive o napotitvi delavcev vključuje naslednje:
2.2 The Commission's proposals to amend Regulation (EC) No 73/2009  (direct payments) and Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (rural development), foresee two types of amendments:
2.2 V predlogih Komisije o spremembi uredb št. 73/2009 (neposredne podpore) in št. 1698/2005 (razvoj podeželja) sta predvideni dve vrsti sprememb:
2.2 The Commission's proposals to amend Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (direct payments) and Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (rural development), foresee two types of amendments:
2.2 V predlogih Komisije o spremembi uredb št. 73/2009 (neposredne podpore) in št. 1698/2005 (razvoj podeželja) sta predvideni dve vrsti sprememb:
2.2 The Commission's report is divided into three sections: competition policy in the current economic context, competition policy in the broader context, and competition dialogue with other institutions.
2.2 Poročilo Komisije ima tri poglavja: politika konkurence v trenutnih gospodarskih razmerah, politika konkurence v širšem okviru in dialog o konkurenci z drugimi institucijami.
2.2 The Commission's way of achieving this improvement in economic performance is gradually to phase out overfishing, because it takes the view that this would bring about economic benefits for the fishing industry in terms of reducing costs, improving catches, improving the profitability of the fishery and reducing discards.
2.2 Komisija za doseganje izboljšanja gospodarske učinkovitosti predlaga postopno odpravo prelova, saj meni, da bi to imelo gospodarske koristi za ribiški sektor, kot so znižanje stroškov, boljši ulov, izboljšanje donosnosti ribištva in zmanjšanje zavržkov.
2.2 The Commission’s aims are to protect the public, achieve financial stability and improve the single market, something which national supervisory schemes cannot achieve even if they are partially harmonised.
2.2 Cilji Komisije so zaščita javnosti, finančna stabilnost in izboljšanje enotnega trga, ki ga nacionalni sistemi nadzora, četudi so deloma usklajeni, ne morejo uresničiti.
2.2 The Commission’s proposal is in essence a proposal that consumer complaints and enquiries be recorded throughout the EU on a common harmonised basis, using the same descriptors, so that a Europe wide database can easily be created, a database owned by the Commission’s DG SANCO.
2.2 Predlog Komisije v bistvu predvideva, da se pritožbe in poizvedbe potrošnikov beležijo v vsej EU na skupni usklajeni podlagi z uporabo istih deskriptorjev, tako da bo lahko enostavno ustvariti vseevropsko bazo podatkov, s katero bo upravljal GD SANCO Evropske komisije.
2.2 The commitments made by the countries that signed the Barcelona Declaration include the following:
2.2 Zaveze, ki so jih sprejele države podpisnice Barcelonske deklaracije, so naslednje:
2.2 The Committee acknowledges the high importance and need for a regulation concerning the use of alien species in aquaculture, in order to protect the aquatic environment and its biodiversity.
2.2 Odbor potrjuje izreden pomen in potrebo po uredbi o uporabi tujih vrst v ribogojstvu, zato da se zavaruje vodno okolje in njegovo biološko raznovrstnost.
2.2 The Committee acknowledges the high importance and need for a regulation concerning the use of alien species in aquaculture, in order to protect the aquatic environment and its biodiversity.
2.2 Odbor potrjuje izreden pomen in potrebo po uredbi o uporabi tujih vrst v ribogojstvu, zato da se zavaruje vodno okolje in njegovo biotsko raznovrstnost.
2.2 The Committee acknowledges the high importance and need for a regulation concerning the use of alien species in aquaculture, in order to protect the aquatic environment and its biodiversity.
2.2 Odbor priznava izreden pomen in potrebo po uredbi o uporabi tujih vrst v ribogojstvu, zato da se zavaruje vodno okolje in njegovo biotsko raznovrstnost.
2.2 The Committee agreed with the views of Member States, that it was "appropriate to go beyond the provisions of the convention in order to fully assist developing countries"3.
2.2 Odbor je soglašal s stališči držav članic, da je bilo "za popolno podporo državam v razvoju primerno preseči določbe konvencije"3.
2.2 The Committee agrees that it is vital to boost prosperity and competitiveness in the Member States most hit by the crisis and therefore supports the above-mentioned proposal.
2.2 Odbor se strinja, da je nujno treba povečati blaginjo in konkurenčnost v državah članicah, ki jih je kriza najbolj prizadela in zato podpira omenjeni predlog.
2.2 The Committee agrees that it is vital to boost prosperity and competitiveness in the Member States most hit by the crisis and therefore supports the above-mentioned proposal.
2.2 Odbor se strinja, da je nujno treba povečati blaginjo in konkurenčnost v državah članicah, ki jih je kriza najbolj prizadela, in zato podpira navedeni predlog.
2.2 The Committee agrees that it is vital to boost prosperity and competitiveness in the Member States most hit by the crisis and therefore supports the above-mentioned proposal.
2.2 Odbor se strinja, da je nujno treba povečati blaginjo in konkurenčnost v državah članicah, ki jih je kriza najbolj prizadela, in zato podpira zgornji predlog.
2.2 The Committee agrees that it is vital to support projects and the recovery of the economy and therefore supports the above-mentioned proposal.
2.2 Odbor se strinja, da je podpora projektom in oživitvi gospodarstva ključnega pomena, zato podpira navedeni predlog.
2.2 The Committee agrees with the need to strengthen the social dimension of the EMU and would like to highlight the following:
2.2 Odbor se strinja, da je treba okrepiti socialno razsežnost EMU, ter v nadaljevanju želi opozoriti na več vprašanj.
2.2 The Committee believes that codification must be undertaken in full compliance with the normal Community legislative procedure.
2.2 Odbor meni, da je treba pri izvajanju kodifikacije popolnoma upoštevati običajni zakonodajni postopek Skupnosti.
2.2 The Committee believes that codification must be undertaken in full compliance with the normal Community legislative procedure.
2.2 Odbor meni, da mora biti kodifikacija izvedena ob popolnem upoštevanju običajnega zakonodajnega postopka Skupnosti.
2.2 The Committee believes that research needs to be carried out at EU level into combating the harmful effects of smoking on children and young people and into their degree of exposure to ETS.
2.2 Odbor meni, da je treba na ravni EU izvesti raziskave o preprečevanju škodljivih učinkov kajenja pri otrocih in mladih ter o ravni njihove izpostavljenosti tobačnemu dimu v okolju.
2.2 The Committee believes that the Commission's proposal – which the Commission itself considered to be exceptional and which is currently being examined by the European Parliament – does not meet the objectives that it is intended to achieve.
2.2 Meni, da predlog, ki ga Komisija sama smatra za izjemo in ga trenutno preučuje tudi Evropski parlament, ne ustreza ciljem, ki naj bi jih dosegel.
2.2 The Committee believes that the Union’s increasing dependency on the Internet and digital technology is not sufficiently matched by practices and policies that provide an adequate level of cyber security across Europe now and into the future.
2.2 Odbor meni, da se z vse večjo odvisnostjo Unije od interneta in digitalne tehnologije premalo skladajo prakse in politike, ki bi nudile primerno raven kibernetske varnosti v vsej Evropi danes in v prihodnje.
2.2 The Committee believes that the Union’s increasing dependency on the Internet and digital technology is not sufficiently matched by practices and policies that provide an adequate level of cyber security across Europe now and into the future.
2.2 Odbor meni, da vse večji odvisnosti Unije od interneta in digitalne tehnologije nezadostno ustrezajo prakse in politike, ki bi nudile primerno raven kibernetske varnosti v vsej Evropi danes in v prihodnje.
2.2 The Committee calls on Member States, industry and the scientific communities, in cooperation with the Commission, to step up joint efforts to ensure European leadership in the supply and use of HPC systems and services by 2020.
2.2 Države članice, industrijo in znanstvene skupnosti se poziva, naj v sodelovanju s Komisijo okrepijo prizadevanja, s katerimi bodo Evropi do leta 2020 zagotovile vodilno mesto na strani ponudbe ter uporabe sistemov in storitev HPC.
2.2 The Committee considers that the European institutions should concentrate their support on the following main goals of the defence industry:
2.2 Odbor meni, da bi morale evropske institucije svojo podporo osredotočiti na naslednje glavne cilje obrambne industrije:
2.2 The Committee decided to draw up this own-initiative opinion in order to draw attention to the situation of people with disabilities in the Mediterranean area and to make a contribution to improving their situation.
2.2 Odbor je sklenil, da pripravi to mnenje na lastno pobudo, da bi opozoril na okoliščine invalidov na sredozemskem območju in prispeval k izboljšanju njihovega položaja.
2.2 The Committee draws particular attention to the intentions of the European Convention, which explicitly sought – as part of the "democratic life of the Union" – to create an agenda-setting instrument for the public which would be on an equal footing with the Parliament and the Council.
2.2 Odbor zlasti opozarja na motive Evropske konvencije, ki je izrecno želela v okviru demokratičnega življenja Unije za državljane ustvariti instrument za oblikovanje programa, ki bi bil enakovreden Parlamentu in Svetu.
2.2 The Committee finds it hard to judge the merits of the proposed CCI without any quantification of the proposed size or any assessment of the acceptability of such a fund to the Member States.
2.2 Odbor meni, da je težko ocenjevati koristi predlaganega instrumenta za konvergenco in konkurenčnost brez količinske opredelitve predlaganega obsega ali ocene sprejemljivosti takega sklada za države članice.
2.2 The Committee has adopted a wide range of opinions concerning the issue of regular and irregular migrations4, therefore this exploratory opinion will focus on health issues.
2.2 Odbor je sprejel številna mnenja o zakonitih in nezakonitih migracijah4, zato se bo v tem mnenju osredotočil na zdravstvena vprašanja.
2.2 The Committee has adopted a wide range of opinions concerning the issue of regular and irregular migrations6, therefore this exploratory opinion will focus on health issues.
2.2 Odbor je sprejel številna mnenja o legalnih in nelegalnih migracijah6, zato se bo v tem mnenju osredotočil na zdravstvena vprašanja.
2.2 The Committee has adopted a wide range of opinions concerning the issue of regular and irregular migrations6, therefore this exploratory opinion will focus on health issues.
2.2 Odbor je sprejel številna mnenja o zakonitih in nezakonitih migracijah6, zato se bo v tem mnenju osredotočil na zdravstvena vprašanja.
2.2 The Committee has already adopted a number of opinions on the Galileo programme1.
2.2 EESO je sprejel že več mnenj o programu Galileo1.
2.2 The Committee has already adopted a number of opinions on the Galileo programme2.
2.2 EESO je sprejel že več mnenj o programu Galileo2.
2.2 The Committee has always called for "a more extensive use of European standardisation in EU policies and legislation in order to extend, in line with the needs of both society and businesses, the expansion of standardisation into new areas such as services, information and telecommunications technology, transport and consumer and environmental protection"1.
2.2 Odbor je vedno zagovarjal "večjo uporabo evropske standardizacije v politikah in zakonodaji EU, da se tehnična standardizacija v skladu s potrebami družbe in podjetij razširi na nova področja, kot so: storitve, informacijska in komunikacijska tehnologija, promet, varstvo potrošnikov in varstvo okolja".1
2.2 The Committee has noted on several occasions that supplying and using energy puts a strain on the environment, involves risks and depends on unforeseeable and external political factors.
2.2 Odbor je večkrat poudaril, da sta zagotavljanje in raba energije povezana z obremenitvami okolja, tveganji ter z zunajpolitično odvisnostjo in nepredvidljivostjo.
2.2 The Committee has produced opinions on Eastern Partnership issues4 but has never considered the problems of rural areas, agriculture and sustainable development in these countries.
2.2 Odbor je pripravil več mnenj o vprašanjih vzhodnega partnerstva,4 vendar nikoli ni obravnaval problemov podeželskih območij, kmetijstva in trajnostnega razvoja v teh državah.
2.2 The Committee highlights the following aspects as particularly positive:
2.2 Kot posebej pozitivne Odbor poudarja naslednje vidike:
2.2 The Committee highlights the following aspects as particularly positive:
2.2 Kot posebno pozitivne Odbor poudarja naslednje vidike:
2.2 The Committee is aware that the use of such a broad definition of civil society can lead to practical difficulties, particularly as regards the issue of cohesion.
2.2 Odbor se zaveda, da lahko tako široko pojmovanje civilne družbe povzroči težave pri praktičnem izvajanju, še posebej pri obravnavi problematike kohezije.
2.2 The Committee is happy to do so, as it agrees with the Commission that it is important to improve the tachograph system and monitoring of it, for the following reasons.
2.2 Odbor se z veseljem odziva na to zaprosilo, saj se strinja s Komisijo, da je treba tahografski sistem in nadzor nad njim izboljšati iz različnih razlogov, navedenih v nadaljevanju.
2.2 The Committee is happy to do so, as it sees the proposal to amend Regulation No 1406/2002 as a major step towards strengthening European cooperation in the field of coastal border control services and improving cooperation and coordination between the relevant EU agencies in order to achieve synergies to make their operation more efficient and cost-effective.
2.2 EESO je vesel tega zaprosila, saj gre pri tem predlogu uredbe o spremembi Uredbe št. 1406/2002 za pomemben korak h krepitvi evropskega sodelovanja na področju obalne straže nadzora ter k boljšemu sodelovanju in usklajevanju med ustreznimi agencijami EU, kar naj bi privedlo do sinergije in s tem do uspešnejšega in stroškovno učinkovitejšega delovanja.
2.2 The committee is to play a decisive role in the preparation of the Community's statistical programme.
2.2 CEIES bi moral pri pripravi statističnih programov Skupnosti imeti najpomembnejšo vlogo.
2.2 The Committee notes that, despite the "Hague Programme", a really satisfactory common political approach does not exist as of yet.
2.2 Odbor opaža, da kljub haaškemu programu še vedno ne obstaja resnično zadovoljiv skupni politični pristop.
2.2 The Committee of the Regions: "regards CLLD as a key tool for harmonious development of urban and rural areas, strengthening capacity to develop ties with the surrounding peri-urban and rural areas"1.
2.2 Odbor regij "meni, da je 'lokalni razvoj, ki ga vodi skupnost' ključen instrument za skladen razvoj mestnih in podeželskih območij, saj krepi zmogljivosti za razvoj povezav z okoliškimi primestnimi in podeželskimi območji".1
2.2 The Committee of the Regions: "regards CLLD as a key tool for harmonious development of urban and rural areas, strengthening capacity to develop ties with the surrounding peri-urban and rural areas"1.
2.2 Odbor regij "meni, da je lokalni razvoj, ki ga vodi skupnost, ključen instrument za skladen razvoj mestnih in podeželskih območij, saj krepi zmogljivosti za razvoj povezav z okoliškimi primestnimi in podeželskimi območji".1
2.2 The Committee of the Regions: "regards CLLD as a key tool for harmonious development of urban and rural areas, strengthening capacity to develop ties with the surrounding peri-urban and rural areas"2.
2.2 Odbor regij "meni, da je lokalni razvoj, ki ga vodi skupnost, ključen instrument za skladen razvoj mestnih in podeželskih območij, saj krepi zmogljivosti za razvoj povezav z okoliškimi primestnimi in podeželskimi območji".2
2.2 The Committee of the Regions: "regards CLLD as a key tool for harmonious development of urban and rural areas, strengthening capacity to develop ties with the surrounding peri-urban and rural areas"3.
2.2 Odbor regij "meni, da je lokalni razvoj, ki ga vodi skupnost, ključen instrument za skladen razvoj mestnih in podeželskih območij, saj krepi zmogljivosti za razvoj povezav z okoliškimi primestnimi in podeželskimi območji"3.
2.2 The Committee points to other existing administrative and financial problems as regards Structural Fund management; it encourages the Commission to draw up proposals to resolve these problems pertaining to levels of project pre-financing; excessive payment periods; the sustainability of the proposed projects; and the de minimis rules.
2.2 EESO opozarja, da pri upravljanju strukturnih skladov obstajajo še drugi upravni in finančni problemi; Komisijo spodbuja, da pripravi predloge za reševanje teh problemov, povezanih z ravnjo predhodnega financiranja projektov, predolgimi roki za plačilo, trajnostjo predlaganih projektov in pravili de minimis.
2.2 The Committee recalls that from the outset, the Lisbon mandate of 24 March 2000:
2.2 Odbor poudarja, da je lizbonski mandat z dne 24. marca 2000 že od svojega začetka:
2.2 The Committee shares the position expressed by the Council2 and the Commission3 that the Post-2015 framework must build on the following principles:
2.2 Odbor podpira stališči Sveta2 in Komisije3, da mora okvir za obdobje po letu 2015 temeljiti na naslednjih načelih:
2.2 The Committee shares the position expressed by the Council3 and the Commission4 that the post-2015 framework must build on the principles of:
2.2 Odbor podpira stališči Sveta3 in Komisije4, da mora okvir za obdobje po letu 2015 temeljiti na naslednjih načelih:
2.2 The Committee shares the Transport Commissioner's concerns regarding fuel supplies and the need to bring forward research and studies on possible solutions relating to developments in transport policy and the need to adopt measures regarding the relevant fuels.
2.2 Odbor deli zaskrbljenost komisarja za promet glede oskrbe z gorivi in potrebe po pospešitvi analiz in študij možnih rešitev glede razvoja prometne politike in potrebe po zagotavljanju goriv.
2.2 The Committee shares the Transport Commissioner's concerns regarding fuel supplies and the need to bring forward research and studies on possible solutions relating to developments in transport policy and the need to adopt measures regarding the relevant fuels.
2.2 Odbor je tako kot komisar za promet zaskrbljen glede oskrbe z gorivi in potrebe po pospešitvi analiz in študij možnih rešitev glede razvoja prometne politike in potrebe po sprejetju ukrepov v zvezi z ustreznimi gorivi.