natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is noted in this respect that the practice of conditional approval , which is expressly provided for in the Banking Directive in the context of authorisation procedures ( 26 ) , would also contribute to further aligning the procedures for granting authorisation to the taking up of the business of credit institutions and the procedures applicable to acquisitions or increases of holdings .
V tej zvezi se ugotavlja , da bi praksa pogojne odobritve , ki je izrecno določena v Bančni direktivi v okviru postopkov izdaje dovoljenja ( 26 ) , prispevala tudi k nadaljnjemu usklajevanju postopkov izdaje dovoljenja za začetek opravljanja dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in postopkov , ki se uporabljajo za pridobitve in povečanja deležev .
Proposed time limits for supervisory assessment
Predlagani roki za nadzorno oceno
3.1 In principle , the ECB considers that procedural measures to enhance the supervisory approval process should not endanger underlying prudential objectives .
3.1 ECB načeloma meni , da postopkovni ukrepi za okrepitev postopka nadzorstvene odobritve ne bi smeli ogroziti temeljnih ciljev varnega in skrbnega poslovanja .
The time limits for the assessment period for ( 18 ) See Commission Communication COM ( 2005 ) 4080 of 21 October 2005 on intra-EU investment in the financial services » sector ( OJ C 293 , 25.11.2005 , p. 2 ) .
Roki v ocenjevalnem obdobju za pridobitve in ( 18 ) Glej Sporočilo Komisije KOM ( 2005 ) 4080 z dne 21 . oktobra 2005 o naložbah znotraj EU v sektorju finančnih storitev ( UL C 293 , 25.11.2005 , str .
( 19 ) Joined Cases C-282 / 04 and C-283 / 04 Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands [ 2006 ] ECR I-0000 , paragraph 20 .
( 19 ) Združeni zadevi C-282 / 04 in C-283 / 04 Komisija proti Kraljevini Nizozemski [ 2006 ] PSES I-0000 , odstavek 20 .
See also Case C-98-01 Commission v United Kingdom [ 2003 ] ECR I-4641 , paragraph 44 , Case C-463 / 00 Commission v Kingdom of Spain [ 2003 ] ECR I-4581 , paragraph 57 and Case C-174 / 04 Commission v Italian Republic [ 2005 ] ECR I-4933 , paragraph 31 .
Glej tudi zadevo C-98-01 Komisija proti Združenemu kraljestvu [ 2003 ] PSES I-4641 , odstavek 44 , zadevo C-463 / 00 Komisija proti Kraljevini Španiji [ 2003 ] PSES I-4581 , odstavek 57 in zadevo C-174 / 04 Komisija proti Italijanski republiki [ 2005 ] PSES I4933 , odstavek 31 .
( 20 ) Joined cases C-282 / 04 and C-283 / 04 Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands , paragraph 32 .
( 20 ) Združeni zadevi C-282 / 04 in C-283 / 04 Komisija proti Kraljevini Nizozemski , odstavek 32 .
( 21 ) Article 58 ( 1 )( b ) of the Treaty .
( 21 ) Člen 58 ( 1 )( b ) Pogodbe .
( 22 ) Article 58 ( 3 ) of the Treaty .
( 22 ) Člen 58 ( 3 ) Pogodbe .
( 23 ) The proposed new Article 19a ( 3 ) of the Banking Directive .
( 23 ) Predlagani novi člen 19a ( 3 ) Bančne direktive .
( 24 ) The proposed new Article 19a ( 1 )( d ) of the Banking Directive .
( 24 ) Predlagani novi člen 19a ( 1 )( d ) Bančne direktive .
( 25 ) The proposed new Article 19a ( 1 )( e ) of the Banking Directive .
( 25 ) Predlagani novi člen 19a ( 1 )( e ) Bančne direktive .
( 26 ) Article 17 ( 1 ) of the Banking Directive provides that « The competent authorities may withdraw the authorisation granted to a credit institution only where such an institution : ...
( 26 ) Člen 17 ( 1 ) Bančne direktive določa , da „ [ p ] ristojni organi lahko odvzamejo dovoljenje , izdano kreditni instituciji le , če ta institucija : ...
( c ) no longer fulfils the conditions under which authorisation was granted » .
( c ) ne izpolnjuje več pogojev , po katerih ji je bilo izdano dovoljenje » .
acquisitions and increases of shareholdings ( 27 ) should therefore first and foremost ensure that the supervisory authorities can take a proper and reasoned decision .
povečanja imetništev delnic ( 27 ) bi morali zato najprej in predvsem zagotoviti , da bi lahko nadzorni organi sprejeli pravilno in utemeljeno odločitev .
In particular , if time limits were unduly restrictive there is a risk that supervisory authorities would be obliged to approve applications even if they had not had the time to conduct a proper analysis , especially in more complex cases .
Če bi bili roki neupravičeno omejevalni , zlasti obstaja tveganje , da bi bili nadzorni organi zavezani odobriti vloge , četudi ne bi imeli dovolj časa za pravilno analizo , predvsem v bolj kompleksnih primerih .
This would adversely affect the credibility and quality of the assessment decisions , which could also have negative effects for financial stability .
To bi negativno vplivalo na verodostojnost in kakovost ocenjevalnih odločitev , kar bi lahko imelo tudi negativne učinke na finančno stabilnost .
3.2 In view of the importance of this issue , the ECB considers that major revisions to the overall assessment period should be made in close consultation with EU supervisory authorities with a view to fully taking into account the professional experience of the competent authorities .
3.2 Glede na pomembnost tega vprašanja ECB meni , da bi bili potrebni večji popravki celotnega ocenjevalnega obdobja , v tesnem posvetovanju z nadzornimi organi EU z namenom polnega upoštevanja poslovnih izkušenj pristojnih organov .
The ECB notes in this respect that the supervisory authorities in all financial sectors have expressed serious concerns ( 28 ) regarding : ( i ) the proposed substantial shortening of the overall timelines for assessment from the current period of approximately sixty-five working days to thirty working days ;
ECB v tej zvezi ugotavlja , da so nadzorni organi v vseh finančnih sektorjih izrazili resne pomisleke ( 28 ) v zvezi s : ( i ) predlaganim bistvenim skrajšanjem celotnega časovnega okvira za oceno s trenutnega obdobja približno petinšestdesetih delovnih dni na trideset delovnih dni ;
and ( ii ) the proposal that the assessment period would begin to run before all necessary information has been received ( 29 ) .
in ( ii ) predlogom , da bi ocenjevalno obdobje začelo teči pred prejemom vseh potrebnih informacij ( 29 ) .
Against this background , the ECB would recommend reconsidering the proposed timelines for the overall assessment .
Glede na navedeno bi ECB predlagala ponovno preučitev predlaganega časovnega okvira za celotno oceno .
3.3 Furthermore , the proposed maximum timelines for supervisory authorities to request additional information from proposed acquirers and for the proposed acquirers to provide such information should be extended .
3.3 Poleg tega bi bilo treba predlagani najdaljši časovni okvir , v katerem lahko nadzorni organi od predlaganih pridobiteljev zahtevajo dodatne informacije in v katerem morajo predlagani pridobitelji takšne informacije zagotoviti , podaljšati .
Especially in cases involving large and complex institutions , requiring substantial supervisory information-sharing ( possibly involving authorities from third countries ) or relating to proposed acquirers who are not subject to prudential supervision , it is typically not feasible to assess properly the need for additional information within a period of five working days ( 30 ) .
Zlasti v primerih , ki vključujejo velike in kompleksne institucije , terjajo obsežno izmenjavo nadzornih informacij ( po možnosti vključujoč organe iz tretjih držav ) ali se nanašajo na predlagane pridobitelje , ki niso predmet nadzora varnega in skrbnega poslovanja , običajno ni izvedljivo , da bi pravilno ocenili potrebo po dodatnih informacijah v obdobju petih delovnih dni ( 30 ) .
The acquirer may also find it difficult to provide such information in all cases within only ten working days ( 31 ) .
Tudi za pridobitelja je lahko težko , da v vseh primerih zagotovi takšne informacije v samo desetih delovnih dneh ( 31 ) .
It would not be desirable if requests for acquisitions or increases of shareholdings had to be rejected by supervisory authorities for lack of information ( 32 ) only because supervisory authorities were unable to fully assess the need for further information or proposed acquirers were unable to deliver this information within an extremely strict time limit .
Ne bi bilo zaželeno , da bi nadzorni organi morali zavrniti zahteve za pridobitve ali povečanja imetništev delnic zaradi pomanjkanja informacij ( 32 ) samo zato , ker niso mogli v celoti oceniti potrebe po dodatnih informacijah ali ker predlagani pridobitelji niso mogli dostaviti teh informacij v skrajno strogem roku .
While the proposed acquirers would have the opportunity to re-notify their requests , such a procedure should remain an exception as it would otherwise make the approval process unnecessarily burdensome and inefficient for both sides .
Čeprav bi predlagani pridobitelji imeli možnost ponovno vložiti svoje zahteve , bi moral takšen postopek ostati izjema , ker bi bil sicer postopek odobritve po nepotrebnem obremenjujoč in neučinkovit za obe strani .
Moreover , in some Member States , negative decisions on applications are made public and may therefore substantially harm the proposed acquirers , especially those who are listed on national or international stock exchanges .
Poleg tega so v nekaterih državah članicah negativne odločitve o vlogah objavljene in lahko zato znatno škodijo predlaganim pridobiteljem , predvsem tistim , ki kotirajo na nacionalnih ali mednarodnih borzah .
3.4 The ECB is of the view that where a proposed acquirer notifies the competent authority of the target but provides an incomplete set of documents or information ( 33 ) this should not automatically trigger an acknowledgment of receipt from the competent authority ( 34 ) and the immediate start of the assessment period ( 35 ) .
3.4 ECB meni , da v primeru , ko predlagani pridobitelj obvesti pristojni organ o nameri , predloži pa nepopoln sklop dokumentov ali informacij ( 33 ) , to ne bi smelo avtomatično sprožiti potrditve prejema s strani pristojnega organa ( 34 ) in takojšnjega začetka ocenjevalnega obdobja ( 35 ) .
Indeed , this is the approach adopted by the Commission in the context of European merger control rules ( 36 ) for the notification of concentrations .
To je sicer res pristop , kakršnega je sprejela Komisija v zvezi z evropskimi pravili nadzora nad združitvami ( 36 ) za priglasitve koncentracij .
The rules implementing the ECMR ( 37 ) ( 27 ) The second subparagraph of the proposed new Article 19 ( 2 ) of the Banking Directive .
Pravila o izvajanju UESZ ( 37 ) določajo , da priglasitve začnejo veljati „na dan , ko jih prejme ( 27 ) Drugi pododstavek predlaganega novega člena 19 ( 2 ) Bančne direktive .
( 28 ) See pages 2 and 4 of the Letter of 29 September 2006 on the subject of cross-border consolidation to Commissioner McCreevy from Arthur Docters van Leeuwen , Chairman of the Committee of European Securities Regulators ( CESR ) , Danièle Nouy , Chair of the Committee of European Banking Supervisors ( CEBS ) , and Henrik Bjerre Nielsen , Chairman of the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisor ( CEIOPS ) .
( 28 ) Glej strani 2 in 4 pisma z dne 29 . septembra 2006 o čezmejni konsolidaciji , ki so ga na komisarja McCreevyja naslovili Arthur Docters van Leeuwen , predsednik Odbora evropskih regulativnih organov s področja vrednostnih papirjev ( CESR ) , Danièle Nouy , predsednica Odbora evropskih bančnih nadzornikov ( CEBS ) , in Henrik Bjerre Nielsen , predsednik Odbora evropskih nadzornikov zavarovanj in poklicnih pokojnin ( CEIOPS ) .
Available on the websites of CESR at www.cesr-eu.org , CEBS at www.c-ebs.org and CEIOPS at www.ceiops.org .
cesr-eu . org , CEBS na naslovu www.c-ebs.org in CEIOPS na naslovu www.ceiops.org .
29 ( ) The proposed new Article 19 ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) of the Banking Directive .
29 ( ) Predlagani novi člen 19 ( 2 ) in ( 3 ) Bančne direktive .
( 30 ) The first subparagraph of the proposed new Article 19 ( 3 ) of the Banking Directive .
( 30 ) Prvi pododstavek predlaganega novega člena 19 ( 3 ) Bančne direktive .
( 31 ) The first sentence of the third subparagraph of the proposed new Article 19 ( 3 ) of the Banking Directive .
( 31 ) Prvi stavek tretjega pododstavka predlaganega novega člena 19 ( 3 ) Bančne direktive .
( 32 ) The proposed new Article 19a ( 2 ) of the Banking Directive .
( 32 ) Predlagani novi člen 19a ( 2 ) Bančne direktive .
( 33 ) The proposed new Article 19 ( 1 ) of the Banking Directive .
( 33 ) Predlagani novi člen 19 ( 1 ) Bančne direktive .
( 34 ) The first subparagraph of the proposed new Article 19 ( 2 ) of the Banking Directive .
( 34 ) Prvi pododstavek predlaganega novega člena 19 ( 2 ) Bančne direktive .
( 35 ) The second subparagraph of the proposed new Article 19 ( 2 ) of the Banking Directive .
( 35 ) Drugi pododstavek predlaganega novega člena 19 ( 2 ) Bančne direktive .
( 36 ) Council Regulation ( EC ) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings ( the EC Merger Regulation ) ( OJ L 24 , 29.1.2004 , p. 1 ) ( hereinafter the « ECMR ') .
januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij ( Uredba ES o združitvah ) ( UL L 24 , 29.1.2004 , str . 1 ) ( v nadaljevanju : „UESZ ") .
( 37 ) Commission Regulation ( EC ) No 802/2004 of 7 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation ( EC ) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings ( OJ L 133 , 30.4.2004 , p. 1 ) ( hereinafter the « ECMR implementing rules ') .
aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta ( ES ) št . 139/2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij ( UL L 133 , 30.4.2004 , str .
C 27/6 EN
1 ) ( v nadaljevanju : „Pravila o izvajanju UESZ ") . C 27/6
provide that the notification becomes effective « on the date on which they are received by the Commission » ( 38 ) .
Komisija » ( 38 ) .
However , where the information is incomplete in any material respect , the Commission has to inform the notifying parties in writing without delay .
Vendar pa mora Komisija , če so podatki nepopolni s katerega koli bistvenega vidika , nemudoma pisno obvestiti stranke , ki priglašajo .
In such cases , notification becomes effective « on the date on which the complete information is received by the Commission » ( 39 ) .
V takih primerih začne priglasitev veljati „na dan , ko Komisija prejme popolne podatke » ( 39 ) .
The Commission must without delay acknowledge in writing receipt of : ( a ) notification ;
Komisija mora nemudoma pisno potrditi prejem : ( a ) priglasitve ;
and ( b ) any reply from notifying parties to the Commission where the information provided was incomplete ( 40 ) .
in ( b ) kakršnega koli odgovora Komisiji s strani strank , ki priglašajo , kadar so predloženi podatki nepopolni ( 40 ) .
Against this background , the ECB would propose that the assessment period should only formally begin once the required information is complete , and that incorrect or misleading information should be considered as incomplete information ( 41 ) .
Glede na navedeno ECB predlaga , da bi se ocenjevalno obdobje formalno začelo šele , ko bi bili zahtevani podatki popolni , in da bi se netočni ali zavajajoči podatki šteli za nepopolne ( 41 ) .
3.5 As a related but more general issue , an assessment of the proposed directive confirms that a number of technical issues cannot be adequately addressed in the framework of the Banking Directive , and that implementing measures might be warranted to cover specific procedural rules that would need to be further refined to ensure sufficient legal certainty and an appropriate level playing field throughout the EU .
3.5 Sorodno , a bolj na splošni ravni , ocena predlagane direktive potrjuje , da številna tehnična vprašanja ne morejo biti ustrezno rešena v okviru Bančne direktive in da bi bili morda upravičeni izvedbeni ukrepi , s katerimi bi bila zajeta posebna postopkovna pravila , ki bi jih bilo treba natančneje opredeliti za zagotovitev zadostne pravne varnosti in primernih enakih konkurenčnih pogojev povsod v EU .
As consistently emphasised in previous opinions , the ECB is of the view that Level 2 legal acts should emerge as the main body of technical rules applicable to EU financial institutions ( 42 ) .
Kot je bilo dosledno poudarjeno v prejšnjih mnenjih , ECB meni , da bi pravni akti na ravni dva morali postati glavno jedro tehničnih pravil , ki se uporabljajo za finančne institucije v EU ( 42 ) .
This view is shared by supervisory authorities , which have also expressed their support for increased use of implementing measures ( 43 ) .
To mnenje delijo tudi nadzorni organi , ki so prav tako izrazili podporo povečanju uporabe izvedbenih ukrepov ( 43 ) .
Against this background , it is therefore proposed to extend the scope of the comitology provisions provided for in the proposed directive ( 44 ) and to make it possible to adopt Level 2 measures which should be implemented consistently throughout the EU before expiry of the transposition period ( 45 ) .
Glede na navedeno se zato predlaga razširitev področja uporabe komitoloških določb , vsebovanih v predlagani direktivi ( 44 ) , in omogočenje sprejemanja ukrepov na ravni dva , ki bi morali biti dosledno izvedeni povsod v EU pred iztekom obdobja za prenos ( 45 ) .
In particular , in addition to specifying and clarifying the prudential assessment criteria , detailed implementing measures should also cover the following aspects : ( i ) rules applicable to notifications submitted by proposed acquirers ( the persons entitled to submit notifications , clarification as to what is meant by the notion of « persons acting in concert » , the effective date of notification , time-limits , etc ) ;
Zlasti bi morali podrobni izvedbeni ukrepi , poleg določitve in pojasnitve meril za oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja , zajeti tudi naslednje vidike : ( i ) pravila , ki se uporabljajo za obvestila s strani predlaganih pridobiteljev ( osebe , ki so upravičene predložiti obvestila , pojasnilo glede pomena pojma „oseb , ki delujejo usklajeno » , datum učinkovanja obvestila , roki itd . ) ;
( ii ) a list specifying the information necessary to supervisory assessment ;
( ii ) seznam informacij , potrebnih za nadzorno oceno ;
and possibly also ( iii ) the type of commitments that proposed acquirers may enter into in relation to competent authorities .
in po možnosti tudi ( iii ) vrste zavez , ki jih predlagani pridobitelji lahko prevzamejo v razmerju do pristojnih organov .
On these aspects , the ECB would like also to stress that lessons could be learned from the detailed procedural rules applying in the context of the ECMR .
V zvezi s temi vidiki želi ECB poudariti tudi možnost pridobitve novih spoznanj iz natančnih postopkovnih pravil , ki se uporabljajo v okviru UESZ .
3.6 Lastly , consideration could be given to introducing more differentiated time limits in the proposed directive , which would be proportionate to the complexity of the acquisition or increase of qualifying holdings under consideration .
3.6 Končno bi veljalo razmisliti tudi o uvedbi bolj raznolikih rokov v predlagano direktivo , ki bi bili sorazmerni s kompleksnostjo obravnavane pridobitve ali povečanja kvalificiranih deležev .
This would be in line with the principle of proportionality , which is already laid down in other provisions of the proposed directive ( 46 ) .
To bi bilo v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti , ki je že določeno v drugih določbah predlagane direktive ( 46 ) .
A distinction between simple and complex cases on the basis of common , objective and transparent classification criteria , which could also be adopted in the form of implementing measures , would have the benefit of ensuring a more expeditious treatment of simple cases while equally safeguarding a sound assessment of more complex cases , which would typically require more time .
Razlikovanje med enostavnimi in kompleksnimi primeri na podlagi enotnih , objektivnih in preglednih meril za klasifikacijo , ki bi bila prav tako lahko sprejeta v obliki izvedbenih ukrepov , bi bilo koristno za zagotovitev hitrejšega obravnavanja enostavnih primerov in obenem zanesljive ocene bolj kompleksnih primerov , ki običajno zahtevajo več časa .
The ECB considers that the time limits presently provided for in the Banking Directive ( 47 ) could continue to be applied for such complex cases ( 48 ) , as well as for those situations already triggering an extended assessment period under the proposed directive ( 49 ) .
ECB meni , da bi se lahko roki , kot so sedaj določeni v Bančni direktivi ( 47 ) , še naprej uporabljali v takšnih kompleksnih primerih ( 48 ) , pa tudi v primerih , ki po predlagani direktivi sprožijo podaljšano ocenjevalno obdobje ( 49 ) .
( 38 ) ( 39 ) ( 40 ) ( 41 ) ( 42 ) Article 5 ( 1 ) of the ECMR implementing rules .
( 38 ) ( 39 ) ( 40 ) ( 41 ) ( 42 ) Člen 5 ( 1 ) Pravil o izvajanju UESZ .
Article 5 ( 2 ) of the ECMR implementing rules .
Člen 5 ( 2 ) Pravil o izvajanju UESZ .
Article 4 ( 3 ) of the ECMR implementing rules .
Člen 4 ( 3 ) Pravil o izvajanju UESZ .
See in this respect also Article 5 ( 4 ) of the ECMR implementing rules .
V zvezi s tem glej tudi člen 5 ( 4 ) Pravil o izvajanju UESZ .
See paragraph 6 of ECB Opinion CON / 2005/4 of 17 February 2005 at the request of the Council of the European Union on a proposal for directives of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Directive 2000/12 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions and Council Directive 93/6 / EEC of 15 March 1993 on the capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions ( OJ C 52 , 2.3.2005 , p. 37 ) .
februarja 2005 na zahtevo Sveta Evropske unije o predlogu za direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ponovnem sprejetju Direktive 2000/12 / ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20 . marca 2000 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti kreditnih institucij ter Direktive Sveta 93/6 / EGS z dne 15 .
In paragraph 10 , the ECB stresses that : « If it is considered that the proposed directives cannot at this stage be amended in line with this approach , the ECB considers that the envisaged legal structure should not be viewed as the final desirable outcome , but rather as one step in a long-term process towards establishing , whenever possible , a directly applicable set of Level 2 technical rules for financial institutions within the EU » .
V odstavku 10 ECB poudarja : „Če se šteje , da predlaganih direktiv na tej stopnji ni mogoče spremeniti v skladu s tem pristopom , ECB meni , da se predvidena pravna struktura ne bi smela šteti za dokončno zaželeni izid , ampak prej za enega od korakov v dolgoročnem postopku v smeri vzpostavitve , kjer je to mogoče , neposredno uporabljivega sklopa tehničnih pravil na ravni dva za finančne institucije v EU » .
For instance , in its consultation paper entitled « The role and tasks of CEBS » ( CP08 ) , July 2005 , ( see paragraphs 40 and 41 ) , CEBS points out that it « has received no requests from the Commission to develop technical detail ( i.e. Lamfalussy Level 2 advice ) for new legislation .
CEBS , na primer , v svojem dokumentu o posvetovanju z naslovom „The role and tasks of CEBS » ( Vloga in naloge CEBS ) ( CP08 ) , julij 2005 , ( glej odstavka 40 in 41 ) , opozarja , da „od Komisije ni prejel nobene zahteve za razvoj tehničnih podrobnosti ( t.j. Lamfalussyjev nasvet na ravni dva ) za novo zakonodajo .
It seems unlikely that the Commission will make such requests in the near future ...
Ne zdi se verjetno , da bi Komisija to zahtevala v bližnji prihodnosti ....
While CEBS is aware of , and appreciates the reasons why this approach has been taken , it believes that it is important to make proper use of the possibilities provided by the Lamfalussy approach in the future » .
Čeprav se CEBS zaveda razlogov za zavzetje tega pristopa in jih spoštuje , pa verjame , da je pomembno v prihodnosti primerno izkoristiti možnosti , ki jih ponuja Lamfalussyjev pristop » .
The proposed new subparagraph ( f ) in Article 150 ( 2 ) of the Banking Directive .
Predlagani novi pododstavek ( f ) člena 150 ( 2 ) Bančne direktive .
As laid down in Article 6 of the proposed directive . The second subparagraph of the proposed new Article 19a ( 4 ) of the Banking Directive .
Kot je določeno v členu 6 predlagane direktive Drugi pododstavek predlaganega novega člena 19a ( 4 ) Bančne direktive .
The second subparagraph of Article 19 ( 1 ) of the Banking Directive .
Drugi pododstavek člena 19 ( 1 ) Bančne direktive .